Slashdot Mirror


Is the Yellowstone Supervolcano About To Blow?

An anonymous reader writes "Apparently, Yellowstone National Park has been having a very unusual number of earthquakes. Many of the most recent tremors have been deeper underground, an ominous sign. Combine that with a rapid rise in elevation over the past three years, and the possibility that earthquake activity from surrounding areas could trigger such an eruption on its own, and you've got the possible warning signs of a supervolcano eruption that would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental US, plunge global temperatures, and wipe out a very significant chunk of world food sources. Here's a little more info to make your New Year brighter!"

877 comments

  1. Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, if we are going to have the sun blocked out by a huge cloud of dust, it would be fantastic to have as much heat trapped on earth as possible!

    1. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by badasscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jesus Christ, the summary is a bit alarmist, no? "Wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental United States?" Uh, no. It would leave half the United States under a dusting of ash. That's not the same as "wiping it out". Because, see, once the ash is cleaned up, the people, places and things underneath are all still there. At worst, it'll mean some clogged pipes and some really dirty shoes for a week or so.

      The eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 left approximately 1/3 of the United States under a dusting of ash as well. Guess what?! We're all still here! In fact, after a couple of weeks, it was like nothing had happened. During the eruption things got a little scary for those who were very close (and deadly for those who were very, very close), but it was just more annoying than anything else for those who dealt with the ash clouds further away. It was basically like just having a big pile of dirt slowly emptied all over a big swath of the country.

      As apocalyptic predictions go, this one's pretty benign.

    2. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Linux_ho · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh come on -- that's no good. What am I going to do with all these Obama's the Antichrist pamphlets if you keep spreading all that rational thought around and telling everyone things are going to be OK? No good at all.

      --
      include $sig;
      1;
    3. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You do realize a Yellowstone eruption would be slightly larger than St. Helens was right? "The Island Park Caldera supereruption that produced the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff was the largest and produced 2,500 times as much ash as the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption."

    4. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Mtn453 · · Score: 0, Troll

      it most likely will not blow but it does. Say good bye. Yellowstone is measured 2,5090 times more powerful than St. Helens and would most likey place molten lava over 20,000+ square miles of land. St Helens is not even in the same category as Yellowstone, Toba, Taupo, Black Tail etc. Yellowstone is a VEI 8 (mega-colossal) where Helens is a VEI 5 (large). If you surve the initial firebombs, earthquakes and lava, then you will have about 200 300 feet of ash to look forward to.

    5. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have NO friggin' idea what you're talking about. The mega-eruption, if it happens, could be *hundreds of thousands* times bigger than Mount St. Helens. The last super volcano was 75,000 years ago. Light was blocked out all over the world. 35 centimeters of ash fell *2500 miles* away. The global temperature plunged 21 degrees. Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand. This one...could be *ten times bigger*.

    6. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by UconnGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are forgetting about the volcanic dust in the lungs that will cause a painful death for many. For the most part, the dust is too fine to be filtered out.

    7. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Mtn453 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wouldn't actually be "hundreds of thousands" as you say. Go back to school and learn your VEI scale.

    8. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Toba eruption is generally thought to have been larger than any of the Yellowstone eruptions. The largest Yellowstone eruption was pretty close, though. Source: http://www.armageddononline.org/known-super-volcanoes.html

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    9. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh oh, does your Mom know you've gone off your meds again?

    10. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, it could very easily be much, much worse than Mt St Helens.

      The 1980 explosion at Mount St. Helens in Washington state blew out about 540 million tons of debris. Morrell said an explosion at Yellowstone likely would be 1,000 times greater, releasing about half a billion tons of ash.

      (emphasis mine).

      Second cite:

      Experts say such an event would have a colossal impact on a global scale... It would have a similar effect to a 1.5km-diameter space rock striking Earth, they claim.... A super-eruption is also five to 10 times more likely to happen than an asteroid impact, the report claims.... The volcanic winter resulting from a super-eruption could last several years or decades, depending on the scale of an eruption, and according to recent computer models, could cause cooling on a global scale of 5-10C.... The crater from the last super-eruption, 640,000 years ago, is large enough to fit Tokyo - the world's biggest city - inside it.

      Not just a dusting of ash, by any means. To extrapolate from a single event (Mt St Helens) which may or may not even be in the same geologic region (I don't know) is pointless when the Snake River Plain has erupted several times over - the entire landscape their bears the scars of it.

    11. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Aetuneo · · Score: 3, Informative

      It also has sharp edges, so it will cut blood vessels and then turn into cement. In your lungs. Fun, right?

      --
      Everything is subjective.
    12. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yellowstone's largest eruption was 2,500 times more powerful than St. Helens.
      It's eruptions cover hundreds of square kilometers, not tens of thousands.
      Most of the United States by area would see a few meters of ash, not a football field's worth (which would be plenty devestating enough).

      Yay for mods blindly modding up posts that contain numbers as "informative."

    13. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by jo42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're an idiot that has no clue what you are talking about. If Yellowstone blows, expect 99.9% of life on Earth to die out within five years from the effect and the side effects.

    14. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Mystery00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      21C? I hope it erupts soon! It's going to be 40C for the next four days here (Australia).

      --
      "we've got trenchcoats and bad attitudes" - John Constantine, HellBlazer
    15. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Score+Whore · · Score: 5, Funny

      7. 17. Twenty one. Three point one four. Eighteen thousand, seven hundred and sixty two. Zero point zero three percent.

    16. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand.

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today. Wouldn't the advancements we've made since the Toba eruption help us to endure the effect of another mega-eruption?

    17. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Oswald · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel any better, I didn't have any trouble understanding your (somewhat humorous) post. Not sure what's up with your other replies -- or their mods. Too much champagne perhaps.

    18. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Jesus Christ, the summary is a bit alarmist, no?"

      is in itself a bit alarmist, no?

    19. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Darkk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is why you always hear about towns and ancient cities being wiped out by a nearby volcano. After the town gets plastered with ash and dust the remaining in the air lingers on getting into people's lungs putting them to slow death.

      We have the means to quickly get away from it but at a large scale such as Yellowstone it's going to affect ALOT of things including livestock that we feed on.

      Those who survive the initial blow will have a long battle of finding food and keeping warm.

      Seems the only real safe place would be aboard the international space station but can't stay there forever either.

      So I would stock up on canned food and water. And plenty of seeds for replanting because you are on your own when it happens.

    20. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Cocoa+Radix · · Score: 1

      The last super volcano was 75,000 years ago. Light was blocked out all over the world. 35 centimeters of ash fell *2500 miles* away. The global temperature plunged 21 degrees. Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand. This one...could be *ten times bigger*.

      I was there; it wasn't really that bad. It just kinda ballooned, fisherman's-tale-style, over the last 75 millennia.

    21. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this time we're ten times stronger.

    22. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by jamesh · · Score: 1

      So I would stock up on canned food and water. And plenty of seeds for replanting because you are on your own when it happens.

      And guns. Lots of guns. To kill the people who try and steal your canned food and water, and guns.

      We may think we are civilised, but just imagine how civilised a million people are going to be when they all realise that there is only enough food for a few thousand people.

    23. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by tgd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The starving people back then didn't have guns.

      And nuclear weapons.

      I'd say, no, most of the advancements when we're talking extinction-level events, are going to hurt not help.

    24. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It sound like a simple constantly running mister integrated into ventilation systems could easily take care of this given problem. Ancient civilisations didn't have this luxury.

    25. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today. Wouldn't the advancements we've made since the Toba eruption help us to endure the effect of another mega-eruption?

      I think most of our advances would be the first casualties. The amount of fine ash (powered glass-like substance) would ruin many of the things we depend on, like power generation, plumbing and sanitation, food distribution... all gone for a considerable period. It may be impossible to grow crops for several seasons due to acid contamination, there is a lot of sulfur in the type of magma under Yellowstone. As a race, we might survive in bunkers if they still exist... sadly the people that will have access to those facilities are not the people I would want to repopulate the world with... not the "fittest" genetically or even mentally, just the ones with political clout. Carpenters, farmers, doctors and paramedics are some of the people I would want to see survive, raising the odds for the species a bit.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    26. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Billions of people, not millions.

      Food enough to feed a few hundred thousand people - though, that's still about 0.016% chance, or so.

      So yeah, to survive you need to kill a hundred people. Not pretty.

    27. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      The summary is actually understating it.

      Yellowstone blows up supervolcano style, and there's no more United States. There's a plain of ash covering millions of dead people, and a handful of refugees who will resort to cannibalism.

    28. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was just on "Apocalypse How" The high end estimate is 6000x Mount St. Helens, not tens or hundreds of thousands...

      Besides what are you going to do about it... nothing so who cares.

    29. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a stupid question for you... can we bleed a volcano ahead of time, like lancing an abscess?

    30. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by BenGL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forty-two.

    31. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Think you meant you'd have to kill 10,000 people. The downside is you won't go down in history as a great conqueror for it.

    32. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      420 blackbirds baked in a pie

    33. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I for one will volunteer to taste test our dead comrades' corpses.

    34. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So yeah, to survive you need to kill a hundred people. Not pretty.

      Better them than me. The squeamish will hesitate and die. The strong will live. Choose.

    35. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by jcr · · Score: 1

      No.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    36. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was -30C here this morning. If you send us half your 40C air we could send you half our -30C air. The average temperature of %C seems much more comfortable.

    37. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by jcr · · Score: 3, Funny

      expect 99.9% of life on Earth to die out

      I hear that 99.9% of statistics that refer to a quantity of 99.9% are made up on the spot for shock value.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    38. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today

      Intellectually and technologically? Sure.

      Civilization? I suspect most of this "civilization" will die as the remainder laugh at the poor ants scrabbling in the streets who were unable to afford air filters or food. Then they'll die too once they realize that they'd have to work the fields that the ants once did, but can't even figure out which end of the seed is up.

    39. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      I meant "at least a thousand". But it's 5am on New Year's Day.

    40. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when you consider the kind of people who are generally privileged enough to get bunker access, I'd be happier staying outside... especially if I had to share the bunker with Elijah Wood and Tea Leoni.

      But looking at luxuries we occasionally enjoy like hydroponic lettuce, filtered water, thermal clothing, etc.; I figured we'd have enough of an advantage. Of course, there's still the problem of ash as you said.

    41. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by HuckleCom · · Score: 1

      On the positive side Al Gore would be wrong and he couldn't make another movie blaming humans for the demise of earth.

    42. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new cannibal zombie overlords.

    43. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Yalius · · Score: 1

      You're not so clueful yourself. The largest volcanic eruption [i]ever[/i] took a million years to wipe out only 75% of land-based species and 95% of marine species. 99.9% in 5 years? No.

    44. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True, but I was thinking about technologies like consumer available solar power, water filtration, thermal clothes, and hydroponic vegetables. My end-of-the-world scenarios have been the product of '70s and '80s apocalyptic films like The Day After, Threads, and The Road Warrior... okay that last bit is a stretch.

      Obviously life post-ELE will be bleak, but would it be any better because of these tools without considering what desperate people with guns and missiles do.

    45. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Yellowstone is sitting on a caldera. IIRC so was Pompeii. The Yellowstone caldera, based on its geologic history, is due to go any day. This is potentially a lot bigger than Mt. St. Helen's. Makes for good reading if you're interested.

    46. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      If we mine the volcano surface with nuclear weapons and detonate them when the volcano is ready to blow, we could mitigate the effect of the blast (or horribly magnify it if done wrong. This could make for a great (read:lousy) sci-fi movie!)

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    47. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...half a billion tons of ash is less than 540 million tons of debris.

    48. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The 1980 explosion at Mount St. Helens in Washington state blew out about 540 million tons of debris. Morrell said an explosion at Yellowstone likely would be 1,000 times greater, releasing about half a billion tons of ash.

      Um, since when is half a billion tons 1,000 times greater than 540 million? (I realize they're not your numbers, timeOday)

    49. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Schemat1c · · Score: 2, Insightful

      23

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    50. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hike!

    51. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Shark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Might want to re-consider solar power in such an event... At least on the short to mid-term.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    52. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Why? Really, I'm curious why we can't trigger smaller eruptions if we know a bigger one will eventually happen. I'm sure there are reasons it wouldn't work today, but are there reasons it couldn't ever?

    53. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up: informative; please.

    54. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Bolkar · · Score: 1

      You mean half a trillion tons of ash (If St. Helens already blew half a billion and Yellowstone is three orders of magnitute bigger)...

    55. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Is there an ammo store in Portland open New Years Day? I was only planning on killing about 933 people, so I need more bullets.

    56. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Numbers are extremely inaccurate - the people about are around six billion, the people that can be fed is anywhere from ten thousand to a billion.

      Stock well up.

    57. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod, I was raised by cannibal zombie overlords!

      Happy New Year's Memes everybody!

    58. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think you meant you'd have to kill 10,000 people. The downside is you won't go down in history as a great conqueror for it.

      If you switch to a diet of long pig then you'll be more efficient and won't have to kill as many people.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    59. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Carpenters, farmers, doctors and paramedics are some of the people I would want to see survive, raising the odds for the species a bit.

      The sad thing is that the first thought I had was along the lines of my being all set considering that I have some skill in farming, hunting, carpentry, blacksmithing, and a few other things.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    60. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A "few meters" of ash covering most of the US would be a pretty major issue. Almost none of the roofs are rated to carry that. All the planted crops, except trees, are killed. All trees less than a few meters die, naturally. You can't plow it. Most plants won't grow in it. Cars won't run for very long when it's in the air and nobody's digging a car out of a few meters of ash without patience, and if you did there's no where to drive it where you won't get bogged down in soft crunchy ash. The ash is suffused with toxic gases, some of which precipitate as acids. When it rains it kills all the life in all the rivers, and the silt changes the course of major rivers and minor streams. When it gets to the Atlantic and the Gulf it kills almost all of the fish in the ocean. It interferes with cell phone reception, TV and radio. A few meters of ash is enough to clog every hydro power plant, every nuclear power plant in the country. It blocks all the railways and all the highways of course, and that's how we move food around. And if you're not directly affected but you don't like America, that would be a fine day to attack. In summary, it's a big deal. Lava? A local issue where a good plan is not to touch the lava, not to get downstream of the lava. Ash, though, it'll wreck your whole week.

      Link. A few inches of ash is a big deal. I've been there. A few meters? It boggles the imagination.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    61. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again: take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure!

    62. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not a sad thing. I have none of those skills. Sure I can make a radio out of two coconut halves, but that's it!

      Now that I think of it, the typical modern American community is totally unprepared for anything which would isolate it, considering how interdependent communities are nowadays.

    63. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Hey, what's with the troll mod? This ought to be Informative.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    64. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ken_g6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      4 8 15 16 23 42

      Now, just type that in every hour, and the eruption won't happen.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    65. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's been kind of a weird trip partially due to exposure to things growing up and partially because of personal curiosity.

      I grew up spending a lot of time on my family's farm, so I have the experience in planting, maintaining and harvesting crops as well as raising animals.

      I also grew up training in martial arts which, after a while, typically includes some medical training (along the way I've ended up helping to treat everything up to and including a gunshot wound).

      I've built several buildings and done other types of woodworking with my father over the years.

      I studied blacksmithing for a while on my own just because I wanted to and I had the opportunity.

      Then you start getting into the basic survival stuff that I learned growing up, so I'm actually pretty adaptable if it comes right down to it. =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    66. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Actually the summary is pretty low key.

      The Toba event killed off most life on Earth 74,000 years ago.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe

      It has been 640,000 years since the last Super Eruption at
      Yellowstone, and the longest time between them is 800,000 roughly.

      Mount St. Helens is a pee shooter compared to these monsters.

      They can potentially kick off a Nuclear Winter around the world.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    67. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Caldera alone is 34 miles by 45 miles.

      34 x 45 is over 1,500 sq. miles.

      As you can see by the Huckleberry Ridge Tuft it is more than
      a few 100 sq. miles, it covers most of 13 states.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HuckleberryRidgeTuff.jpg

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_caldera

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    68. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      So, up to 600,000? That's a buttload of bullets. I'll buy some fire, too.

    69. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Yellowstone one 2.1 million years ago was about same
      as the Toba.

      The Fish Canyon Tuft one in Colorado was bigger than both COMBINED.

      That is scary as hell.

      Glad it was a one off like 50 million years ago.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    70. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      So to implement "ten times bigger", we would get: "Light was blocked out all over the world. 3.5 meters of ash fell *2500 miles* away. (or 35 cm 25.000 miles away) The global temperature plunged 210 degrees. Mankind was absolutely extinguished, and even the remains of the extermination were extinguished."

      (And: Yes, I'm exaggerating. That's the point. :P)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    71. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 3, Informative

      It can be filtered out by a N-95 or better rated mask.

      http://www.ci.anchorage.ak.us/healthesd/AirQualityVolcano.cfm

      Around paragraph 6 roughly.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    72. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      The volcano is going to kill a few for you.

      Also if your bug out location is sparsely populated and
      not near any stores or cities, the odds you will see anyone
      at all drops to near zero.

      My bug out spot for various scenarios is far from cities,
      and I have some a full range of gear to survive pretty much
      anything except a "direct" hit by nuke or asteroid.

      Underground is the ONLY way to go in volcanic or nuclear winter.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    73. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You're a bit pessimistic.

      I think nuclear reactors (and maybe, later, fusion reactors) are the main thing putting us trough a volcanic ice age.
      This could go so far that we could heat big domes for plants to grow.

      Of course, I'm for a "clean up the atmosphere project" too, because it's always better to remove the earliest cause that you still can influence.
      If the atmosphere is full of crap anyway, it's much simpler to come up with something to add to it. ;)

      (Yeah, I'm heavily drunk, it's 07:09 AM, and I'm posting on Slashdot. I bet that's not what the inventors of Red Bull intended. I bet the girls miss me. *hic*)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    74. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Darby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when you consider the kind of people who are generally privileged enough to get bunker access, I'd be happier staying outside... especially if I had to share the bunker with Elijah Wood and Tea Leoni.

      Completely wrong kind of privilege, Dude.
      Picture sharing a bunker with Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton.
      Elija and Tea would only make it if they were somebody's property.

    75. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by kv9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      is that you, Chuck Norris? what are you doing posting on slashdot?

    76. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      It will not be quite that bad.

      Per the scientists the studied Toba it was close to 60 - 75%
      with no tech and no technology.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_volcano#Media_portrayal

      I used to think it was 90%, its actually a fair bit less.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    77. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Jbcarpen · · Score: 1

      540 M tons of debris, 99% of that was rock not ash.

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
    78. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. Where would you get enough power and water, at current technology levels, to maintain this in a house? In the kind of world we would consider in such an event - The reduced solar power input, major climate cooling (perhaps enough to cause an ice age), feets of ashes producing a worldwide famine for a few years, like our civilization, and many ones before it, have never seen, going back to a couple thousand living humans to at most a couple million, our technology helping?

    79. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by farrellj · · Score: 2, Informative

      5

      The Law of Fives states simply that: All Things happen in Fives, or are divisible by or are multiples of Five, or are somehow directly or indirectly appropriate to 5.
      The Law of Fives is never wrong.

      -P Discordia

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    80. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Sure, all that "medicine", "air filtration", "water purification", and "food preservation" technologies are all just a flash in the pan. Guns will allow those who are in a favorable position to retain that position against invaders, and probably hunt for more food. I don't really see why anyone would use nukes under such a situation, as it would only make things worse for everyone, while providing no benefit for those using them.

      Seriously though, humans are about as hard to wipe out as insects at this point, at least over any relatively short timescale (a few years or less). Given a few tens thousand dollars and a few weeks, almost anyone could put together a shelter supplied with enough food and water to last for a couple of years without resupply, even if it's covered in a couple of meters of volcanic ash. Ancient man didn't have anything on that.

    81. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Picture sharing a bunker with Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton.

      Awesome! They'd murder each other, leaving more room for me!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    82. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      So yeah, to survive you need to kill a hundred people. Not pretty.

      More like they have to die, not that you have to kill them all personally. Some fraction will be wiped out without your help.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    83. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you want cement all over everything!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    84. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And if you're not directly affected but you don't like America, that would be a fine day to attack.

      Attack what with what? They would need equipment capable of traversing this ash-filled wasteland. If they manage to encounter people, they are likely barracaded and armed. The attackers might even be doing a favor by bringing supplies. Who cares if some in your camp eat it? The survivors have more food plus whatever is scavanged from the foolish attackers. Attackers who would be hard pressed to attack ash pile A or ash pile B. If we were attacked with nukes, it is likely our silos are still active and may be able to retailate (assuming satellite communication remains). If they still had nukes, why waste them on a land that may be unoccupied for years? A typical nuke attack would be the city, but a typical survivor might be rural America - hard to hit. Nuclear winter on top of a supervolcano may have little to no affect. Ash might make a hell of shield. Survivors would be hunkered down taking their daily vitamin and portion of rice - but oh noes - the background radiation just went up a but and someone might get cancer.

    85. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UconnGuy,
      I have a $20 respirator with disposable outer filters from home depot that tells me you have no clue what you are talking about.

    86. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kind of. Our technology is so advanced, however, that supplying it is becoming a problem for our primitive economics (see, for example, the farmers can't get credit to buy fertilizer causing the price of fertilizer to increase causing farmers to be unable to buy it problem this year).

    87. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a good idea. Then instead of a 2500 mile radius area covered in volcanic ash, you've got a 2500 mile radius are covered in radioactive volcanic ash.

    88. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Frostalicious · · Score: 4, Funny

      none of the roofs are rated to carry that. All the planted crops, except trees, are killed. All trees less than a few meters die, naturally. You can't plow it. Most plants won't grow in it. Cars won't run for very long when it's in the air and nobody's digging a car out of a few meters of ash without patience, and if you did there's no where to drive it where you won't get bogged down in soft crunchy ash. The ash is suffused with toxic gases, some of which precipitate as acids. When it rains it kills all the life in all the rivers, and the silt changes the course of major rivers and minor streams. When it gets to the Atlantic and the Gulf it kills almost all of the fish in the ocean. It interferes with cell phone reception, TV and radio. A few meters of ash is enough to clog every hydro power plant, every nuclear power plant in the country. It blocks all the railways and all the highways of course, and that's how we move food around. And if you're not directly affected but you don't like America, that would be a fine day to attack.

      Shit, will it really affect my cell phone reception?

    89. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Dude, your iPhone will be at like no bars.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    90. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Yes, I knew that... I just have an easier time admitting to myself that I could die from a volcano eruption than that I could live in a bunker indefinitely with the Cheneys or the Clintons. Let me have my dreams.

    91. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      You don't want to live in a bunker when it gets covered in a few feet of ash - and then it starts to rain on that ash. You will have a free luxury grave.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    92. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by RSKennan · · Score: 1

      No, no NO! We need to take our extra citizens, freeze them with an alcohol-glycol mixture, stack them around the volcano, THEN blow it up with H-Bombs. After that, we can trap their souls and brainwash them with movies to believe anything we want them to. They then get reincarnated, and the whole human race moves in whichever direction we choose. We're geeks, so we can brainwash them with ideas like "space travel is good" and "Knowledge wants to be free", along with some good stuff about geeks being the master race. Hell, this technique worked before, when it was used for Evil...

    93. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Solar power doesn't do you much good when there's enough ash in the air to block out the sun for several weeks or months.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    94. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Yellowstone is definitely about to erupt. The catch is, this is 'about to' in geological terms, which means some time between next Tuesday and around 150,000 years in the future.

      In related news, the Earth's magnetic core is about to undergo its routine reversal.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    95. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I would imagine a place like Cheyenne Mountain has the equipment and personal to keep an exit open... or blast a new one. I also wonder how many places exist that don't have the reputation of the NORAD Operations Center, but still have the survivability requirements.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    96. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by jandersen · · Score: 1

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today. Wouldn't the advancements we've made since the Toba eruption help us to endure the effect of another mega-eruption?

      Perhaps - I suppose it depends on how much of the infrastructure is still usable. As we can see with many other disasters in the world, getting help out to those in need is often the biggest problem; add to that the fact that most modern Americans have next to no survival skills when it comes to living with no technology at all. Humans 75000 years agou were probably significantly better equipped for living rough. In my view it is not unlikely that a far larger proportion of humans would succumb to this kind of catastrophe; but of course, in survival of the species terms, we can afford to take a huge hit, because there are so many of us.

    97. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Is that related to long cat?

      --
      No existe.
    98. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're doing it wrong! The numbers have to mean something:

      1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 ...

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    99. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why would we ever want to?

      Look at the speed at which our technology is going forward. I would at any time rather choose larger explosion 200 years from now than a smaller now. It might be that in 200 years we have better technology to contain it, prevent it all together or just help us continue with little problems if it happens.

      So unless there are many scales of difference (as in just a minor volcanic eruption against half of the world dieing in which case I would agree that the best risk management is not to depend on "Our children will come up with something") I don't think we should trigger it earlier.

    100. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Better them than me. The squeamish will hesitate and die. The strong will live. Choose.

      That's fine. Give me your address and approximate location and I'll make sure to include you among the ones I have to kill. Fair enough, isn't it? Remember: There's always someone else stronger than you out there. You're not as tough as you think, and neither am I. Am I tougher than you? I don't know, and neither do you.

    101. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The last super volcano was 75,000 years ago. [...] Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand. This one...could be *ten times bigger*.

      The big eruption in question was Toba, in Indonesia, not Yellowstone.

      It's more likely to be nothing much than something big. Which does not mean that the probability of it being something big is *zero*, just that it's fairly low. In the event that it is something big - well so what? It's not going to affect anywhere particularly important, just America, Canada, and possibly the Carribean ; there'll be knock-on effects on the rest of the world, but nothing that'll be too drastic. It might put things back by a couple of decades, but that'll only take a couple of decades to fix.

      Hey, we could always have another Laki, just to spread the misery around a little. But what I'd really like to see would be a new kimberlite eruption ; there are so many things about the kimberlite process that we still don't understand.
      (Yes, I do have a "friggin' idea" what I'm talking about ; probably a better "masturbatory concept" than you do.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    102. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand

      Well, the flip side is that our race was apparently resilient enough to survive the last super volcano without the benefit of modern technology. I'd lay pretty good odds on our surviving the next eruption -- though I dunno if I would want to live in such a World.

      Good time to start stocking up on canned food and ammo I suppose ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    103. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand.

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today. Wouldn't the advancements we've made since the Toba eruption help us to endure the effect of another mega-eruption?

      Oh, wake up! It's not gonna be like "The day After Tomorrow". More like New Orleans after Katrina. We would fall flat on our faces and fail yet again. We DON'T learn.

    104. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better put the second amendment to use as well.

      Guns protect your food and can even get you food.

    105. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by sleigher · · Score: 1

      Can you explain why you have lied in your post so blatantly. It says clearly in your sig that you ate peoples brains to learn all that stuff.....

      --
      All points of time and space are connected.
    106. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by repvik · · Score: 1

      The history is written by the victor(s). All the 10,000 people you killed had rabies, AIDS and were nazi zombies!

    107. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If that doesn't work, there is always a virgin sacrifice.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    108. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Shihar · · Score: 1

      You could dump a few feet of ash onto Boston and Boston would be okay. They would get the snow plows out, everyone would grumble about the fucking weather, you might have to wear a simple filter mask, and life in the northeast would carry on with perhaps a little more northeastern "cheer" than normal. Moving shit that falls from the sky somewhere else is not that hard and the equipment to do it is already readily available.

      As far as the environmental effects go, they are vastly overrated. The real danger of ash at any distance is not the gasses. It is the fact that you are breathing with is basically fine glass particles. Thankfully, humans are pretty resourceful and will just toss a simple filter mask on. The effect on the environment is even more trivial. Sure, you might have one shitty year of crops, but after that? Get ready for a bumper harvest like you can't imagine. After a few rain storms that volcanic ash gets neutralized and becomes excellent fertilizer. In fact, most of the world's fertility actually comes from volcanic ash.

      There are only two things that make an eruption like that suck. First, you really don't want to be in the blast radius. A good sizable hunk of land in the middle of the US would be useless for a year or two. If it happened with little warning, a lot, but not a truly significant number of Americans might die. Second, dropping global temperatures would also be unpleasant. For the US though, it would be livable. It would suck, but it would be livable. The US has on hand a massive supply of food and can merrily feed its population even if no one else wants to for a significant amount of time. It might be bland, but you would live.

      Give modern humans some credit. They don't take kindly to being exterminated and will expend a lot of energy and technological know how to avoid it. Nothing short of massive celestial event is going to wipe out humans any time soon.

    109. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by RockDoctor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why? Really, I'm curious why we can't trigger smaller eruptions if we know a bigger one will eventually happen. I'm sure there are reasons it wouldn't work today, but are there reasons it couldn't ever?

      Quality of information is the fundamental problem, coupled with the variability of real rocks.

      [/self : puts on my formal "geologist" hat ; it is my job, though not this particular aspect of geology]

      The area around Jellystone (and all volcanos) has a long and complex history ; particular rock units vary on a scale of centimetres to metres and larger, through bedding and faulting, to say nothing of the more subtle variations resulting from hydrothermal alteration. These variations in constitution and physical organisation of the materials lead to considerable (several orders of magnitude) variations in rock strength on quite small scales - metres, if not finer.

      So, to accurately characterise the rock volume where you're intending to set off a small, controlled eruption, you need that scale of knowledge of the rock units in order to work out where you can safely set off that "small, controlled eruption", and indeed, how to set off that "small, controlled eruption".

      Which is well and good - it gives us a goal of the approximate level of information that we need to plan and execute the "small, controlled eruption" plan. We'd need to characterise most of the immediate vicinity of the volcano that we're planning to "defuse" - for the Jellystone hotspot hmmm, on the order of 100km of land area to a depth of several km, say 300km^3 of rock with data at (say) 10cm spacing, and with density, triaxial strength and stiffness data, temperature, pressure, stress field (triaxial again), and a few other bytes of data. Lets say 20 bytes of data per station and around 300 x 10^9(km^3->m^3) x 1000 (data points per m^3) = 3 * 10^14 stations. So we're looking at on the order of 10^16 bytes of data for the core area, and I'd guess the same for surrounding areas at progressively decreasing data density to control for "edge effects" (I'm getting a bit hand-wavy here ; it shows!). Say 10^17 bytes of raw data and working / intermediate results. That's around 100 petabytes, or approximately 10 years worth of LHC data.

      That's a serious chunk of computing power, but not incredible. It also allows us to put some sort of cost on the project - the LHC is costing on the order of 5 billion USD, so we're looking into the same sort of region of cost for working out what to do and how to do it. GIVEN that we've got the data to analyse. And that's where the problem lies.

      To get the data that's necessary to do this modelling, we're going to need to measure those 20-odd bytes of data for those points, at something approaching that data density. Which we don't have techniques for. We can get some data points - for example I can measure the porosity, permeability and fluid pressure at centimetric scale in a borehole. The tools used are the MDT (if I'm working with Schlumberger equipment) or RCI (from Baker Atlas), but there are others. For measuring rock strengths ... well, I could conceive of relevant tools, and I could conceive of using them at the same time as doing the pressure measurements. Getting the triaxial stress field is a deal more involved (since drilling the borehole induces a change in the stress field, by drilling out the rock), but I can envisage doing it. So let's say that we can get our data using currently conceivable direct measurements for essentially the cost of drilling the borehole.

      A 3km hole in hard rock. That would be in the region of a million USD, if you're doing it wholesale. To characterise the whole rock volume, you're going to need to drill in the order of one every 10 metre to make even a faint approach at getting the areal data density (your surface borehole is going to be nearly a metre across, so you can't go to any better data density than 1/

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    110. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by zmooc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      once the ash is cleaned up

      Um. How would you clean up a layer of ash 20 centimeters thick that spans half a country?! That's enough debris to create about 30 new Mount Everests... Well that's if it were compacted; in its dusty form it's probably more like half a meter thick. Since it tends to collect in lower areas, expect up to a meter of very fine (like quicksand) ash in the streets. This will not be cleaned up; mother nature will add add a bit of water and half the country will effectively become a massive mudslide or it will be covered under a big fat slab of concrete heavy enough to make just about any house collapse. Well, not just about any house, only the houses that are still standing after the massive mudflows...

      This ash is not just normal ash either, it is like tiny splinters of glass that form a layer of concrete when water is added. Lungs are very wet places as fat as this ash is concerned...

      Also, your comparison with Mount St. Helens makes no sense; if Yellowstone were to blow, it would produce 300-1000 times as much debris as Mount St. Helens did in 1980. Volcanos like Yellowstone probably produce enough debris to not only trigger an ice age, but the dust they leave in the atmosphere might very well be enough not to have any agricultural production for years. So Yellowstone might not just be big enough to wipe out half the United States, it might be big enough to wipe out most of humanity. The summary is not "a bit alarmist", it is very conservative.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    111. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      the Yellowstone volcano will "blow up" several states... wipe them off the map. Then spread them evenly across the rest of the continental US. Because of the way the wind blows California and the eastern seaboard like New York might not get hit too badly. Everything from the Rockies to Appalachians will be blown up or covered in several feet of ash... not a dusting like with St. Helen's. It will be just like the "nuclear winter" everybody was afraid of in the cold war.

      I'd like to think as far away as Michigan would be "safe" enough to weather some earthquake tremors and push some dust out of the way, but that's a major ecological disaster. Farmland and wildlife can't be dug out... crops will be lost on a scale never heard of in the US. On the flip-side the volcanic ash will refresh the farmlands in the Great Plains and in 10-20 years they will be as fertile as ever...if any people are around to farm there again.

    112. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      so you're saying we have better ways to finish ourselves off they cave men did?

      Go Extinction!

      Can we leave some neat fossils behind? Make sure strike a good pose when the roach people did us up in a million years?

    113. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Your macbook pro, cell phone, car, refrigerator, etc. will not save you when you're buried in volcanic ash, even if you think you're smart.

    114. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Okay, that makes sense. Thanks!

    115. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Phorion · · Score: 1

      That's numberwang!

    116. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by drerwk · · Score: 1

      Being a physicist I will assume the entirety of the lava dome is a sphere of radius 12 km; this is a volume of 6,000 cubic kilometers.
      This give a mass of 1.8 * 10^16 kilograms assuming a density of 3gm/cm^3.
      I'll set the heat capacity to 1 of course in units (kJ/kg K).
      I'm not so good with the equation of state for rock at the pressures down at 10km, so some more assumptions using Google:
      "The temperature of basalt lava at Kilauea reaches 1,160 degrees C."- I'll take this as the current temperature of our sphere.
      "On average, the geothermal gradient is approximately 75 degrees F per mile. In volcanically active areas, the gradient can be as high as 150 degrees F per mile."
      Now, these numbers are not entierly self consistent, but I'll assume we would like to cool the sphere to 600 degrees C, or a delta of 500 degrees Kelvin.
      So we need to remove 1.8 * 10^16 kg * 500 K = 1 * 10^22 Joule.
      US consumption per year is about 2 x 10^22.
      Now maybe I've got some numbers wrong, because I'd have assumed the energy content under Yellowstone to be much larger than yearly US consumption. But if it is the same then I will argue that we can imagine removing this much energy in a timely fashion. A little work on high temperature deep drilling, inject some water, extract steam.
      Profit!

    117. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by u38cg · · Score: 1

      That's great, but unless you personally have the skills to create them from scratch, knowing that such things can be manufactured is worthless. In a doomsday scenario, there are no communications links and transport becomes non-existant, meanign that it becomes practically impossible to quickly duplicate many of the things we take for granted.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    118. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot 42.

    119. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Modern civilization is a network. It allows us to gain the benefits of economies of scale by having us specialize. These efficiencies makes modern civilization extremely robust with respect to small to medium sized disasters. Local famine is not even noticed by those portions of society which have the money to draw resources from far away.

      On the other hand, a disruption large enough to damage our ability to communicate and transport might actually be worse for us than it would be for a more primitive civilization.

      Think of people living, say, five thousand years ago. They may trade materials and items over surprisingly long distances, but they are basically self-sufficient. Life his hard, and a large world wide disaster would make that harder, but anybody living in a place where survival is possibly have a good shot. This disruption of trade has practically no effect.

      How, think about the effect of the collapse of trade on your ability to survive. Can you build a shelter? Or even build a fire, once matches run out? Can you hunt, grow, or forage enough food to survive? (It's funny how so many people's first thoughts seem to run to guns. Of course guns are useful, but only over the short term.)

      I'd posit that modern civilization is vastly more robust in the face of disruption ... up to a point.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    120. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the question is what percentage will survive such a calamity? The average American has a week or two's worth of non-perishable goods and I have been to Japan and Europe and the folk I met there had even less sizable pantries. Me, well every time I see a crazy deal for something that will keep for a long period of time like rice, pasta, canned beans or vegetables I buy a bunch of it. This xmas I bought 24 tins of refried beans for 10 dollars, 30 cans of real Spam for under 40 dollars and 4 20lb bags of brown rice for 60 dollars. Once it is past the expiration date I buy more than donate the slightly expired food to a food bank. For about 300 dollars a year and bargain hunting I have built up about 6 months worth of food for myself. I plan on getting a 50 gallon drum for water soon and this will all fit in a medium sized apartment easy. Oh and chicks dig a man who has a larder, especially in colder climates I think it might be hard wired into their brains.

    121. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If you switch to a diet of long pig then you'll be more efficient and won't have to kill as many people.

      And you won't have too long to wait until the long pig's parasites get you.

      Eating your own species is not the best of ideas, partly because you may well be eating other instances of parts of your own genome, but mostly because anything that is capable of living in the dinner is going to be capable of living in you. Enough people still suffer from food poisoning from non-human adapted parasites that you can bet that some people will start acting as breeding grounds for better parasites once you get a long pig diet spreading.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    122. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the question is what percentage will survive such a calamity?

      Probably not even a majority but I think the human race itself would manage to survive. It'd be rough going for a long time but we'd make it in the end.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    123. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      It interferes with cell phone reception, TV and radio.

      For a moment you had me scared there: no cell phone reception! But then I figured out I could still use VOIP over WiFi if needed - that saved my day.

    124. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can make a fire with a few pieces of wood and a piece of string, and yes I can make that string. Making a shelter is trivial, as would be making a bicycle powered generator (later followed by a steam generator) to run the ten lifetimes worth of light bulbs that would be sitting around unused. Yet still guns are the first thing that I would try to get my hands on. Having long term survival skills don't do a bit of good if you don't make it through the first month.

      Actually, being able to build shelter wouldn't be a real useful skill, as a massive drop in the human population would leave far more structures than people, even after the inevitable fires wipe out entire neighborhoods. A more important skill would be knowing how to heat the structure without killing yourself.

    125. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by sir+fer · · Score: 0

      More to do with hot poisonous gas being pumped out along with the searing pyroclastic flow...not just the dust, but how it is delivered...

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    126. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today.

      The historical and anthropological definition of "civilization" is "people living in cities" and cities are only 10-12,000 years old max. Therefore, there was no human civilization 75,000 years ago.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    127. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by hmckee · · Score: 1

      Just curious, where did you get this info? The USGS thinks differently.

      http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/ash/health/index.php

    128. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have a similar effect to a 1.5km-diameter space rock striking Earth, they claim....

      Talk about a crap analogy. Guess what, guys -- they're supposed to help you go from the unknown to the known. Does anyone here personally have a good feel for what it would be like to have such a rock hit the earth? Likely no more than a feel for how big a pile $750B would be if it were in singles. Would that all fit into a football stadium or into the Caribbean basin? Sheesh.

      In any case, try reading Schneier on real vs. perceived/imagined risk.

    129. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Being a physicist I will assume the entirety of the lava dome is a sphere of radius 12 km;

      Being a geologist, your assumptions may be adequate for a back-of-the-envelope right-order-of-magnitude estimate ... actually, I'd suspect that they're not even adequate for that.

      First assumption is embedded in "the lava" : you're assuming that it's a single entity of more-or-less uniform composition, properties and age. Almost all of these assumptions are likely to be somewhere between significantly wrong and so wrong they're not even wrong.

      For small magma bodies, "dykes", "plugs" and "sills", you can get a reasonably simple, one-punch history, of one magma composition from one source rock injected in one event at one time. For anything more than a few tens of metres in any dimension ... there are variations.

      As an example, there is at least one sill in IIRC Oregon which records a changing direction of the magnetic field between it's upper and lower margins compared to it's centre. That means that the different parts of this several-metre thick rock body passed through it's Curie temperature at times separated by (the order of) a thousand years. So, your volumetrics and heat release figures need to take that distribution of the heat energy and spread it around over at least a thousand years. Which changes your implied power-extraction values considerably.

      [ Wife has plans to drag me to the movies ; gotta go now. There's nothing wrong with your physical theory, but geological reality is much dirtier than physical theory. Old joke : "In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice while in practice, there is." Old joke reflects real reality. ]

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    130. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god I smoke. I'm getting ready for all that ash.

    131. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Fuzzy+Greybeard · · Score: 1

      7. 17. Twenty one. Three point one four. Eighteen thousand, seven hundred and sixty two. Zero point zero three percent.

      ... Hut! Ah geez ... don't tell me you forgot 'Hut'

    132. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Fuzzy+Greybeard · · Score: 1

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today. /p>

      Based on which assumptions? Most cultural archeology goes back only a few thousand years. Are we absolutely sure that the technology 'way back when' wasn't devastated by the dramatic drop in population? After all, some stories of mythical Atlantis tell of some fantastic capabilities ...

    133. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Hellburner · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to rain (ash) on your apocalypse debunking parade, but I seem to recall that there are soil layers throughout the midwest that are meters thick.

      Meters thick of ash.

      From volcanoes.

      In North America.

      So...it might do more than make your shoes dirty.

    134. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the advancements we've made since the Toba eruption help us to endure the effect of another mega-eruption?

      Not really. The world's infrastructure relies on money, and because of this is quite fragile. Stop one part of the infrastructure, and the flow of money stops. Stop the flow of money, and the infrastructure stops. Doesn't matter if we've got cars and planes unless you live near a fuel processing plant and know how to run it.

    135. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      It interferes with cell phone reception, TV and radio.

      But I'll still be able to watch SpongeBob on Cable right? RIGHT!??!!

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    136. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by jcr · · Score: 1

      "Assuming a spherical cat..."

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    137. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Are you volunteering? :)

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    138. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Guns are useful for more than the "short term".

      I personally have enough .22 ammunition to put food on the table for a family of four for upwards of 20 years.

      Center-fire ammo wouldn't be used much for hunting , but I have enough components for another 15,000 rounds.

      I'm not considered a "prepper" by any stretch. Shooting is just a hobby of mine, and ammo goes fast. It is not uncommon for people to buy ammunition a crate (or multiple crates) at a time. You know you're into shooting as a hobby when your ammo order arrives on a FedEx Freight truck, and you have to rent a forklift to get it into your garage.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    139. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by drerwk · · Score: 1

      I only need to know a couple of things: how much heat do I need to remove, and how do I remove the heat? If my numbers were even two orders of magnitude correct, then I know we could remove the heat on a time scale much shorter than the one the volcano explodes on. Not being a geologist, I don't actually care about the rock other than knowing it conducts heat and being able to drill it to get some working fluid down there to remove the heat. To me the most interesting problem now is an engineering one of how do I drill the mix of rock at that temperature. I spent enough time with drillers talking about their mud to know this is a hard problem, but probably only DARPA hard, not impossible. I am not advocating setting off small eruptions like one of the original posts in this thread.

    140. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      ...And yet the law of Fives is in fact 3 laws...

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    141. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Five, but two are secret.

      ttyl
                Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    142. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Strange. Seeing as how Yellowstone last blew up 640,000 years ago, and there have been even more recent, similar sized eruptions. If each one wipes out 99.9% of life on the planet then life sure does recover awfully fast.

    143. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I asked in the first place, I meant outpatient procedure... not brain surgery.

      Do we really need a high resolution image of the inside of the entire earth before we could do this? Would we have to collect a trillion petabytes of data to figure out where to make a gigantic hole in the ground?

      I mean, "big hole, big explosion, smaller eruption"...? Or was this just one of those situations where the guy with an IQ of 200 gets hit by a train trying to work out the single most efficient way to get off the tracks?

    144. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am not advocating setting off small eruptions like one of the original posts in this thread."

      Nobody is advocating. We're simply asking, "why not", which I'm not sure we have an answer to yet.

    145. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Toba eruption 70.000-75.000 ybp was probably somewhat larger than the three large Yellowstone eruptions. The Yellowstone magma chamber is not large enough to feed an eruption ten times bigger. The biggest explosive eruption in the last 500M yrs was the Fish Canyon Tuff in the San Juan Mountains, which may have been about twice the size of the Toba eruption in volume terms.

    146. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It's too late for me. I know, seems odd being slashdot and all. No pictures to prove it either. But my kids will vouch for me.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    147. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that 99.9% of statistics that refer to a quantity of 99.9% are made up on the spot for shock value.

      You are 99.8% correct. Good day sir.

    148. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand.

      But this was human civilization from 75,000 years ago, which intellectually and technologically pales in comparison to human civilization today. Wouldn't the advancements we've made since the Toba eruption help us to endure the effect of another mega-eruption?

      Which advances, the iPhone? 75000 years ago all humans could live off the land. How many today could? What in your liberal arts or accounting degree prepares you for hunting and farming?

    149. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! by morari · · Score: 1

      This sounds like just the type of event we need. Weed out the gene pool a little, aye?

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  2. It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dec 21, 2012

    1. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used up all my mod points or I'd mod this up. Those Mayans were a smart bunch.

    2. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aww, damn, you took my prediction date.

      I say Dec 21, 2012 at 11:11pm UTC.

    3. Re:It WILL blow up on... by snaildarter · · Score: 1

      God damn that joke is nerdy. God damn am I a nerd for getting it.

      --
      Japanese scientist: Technically, sir, tomatoes are fags. Military scientist: He means fruits.
    4. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Extremus · · Score: 2, Informative

      that would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental US

      You Americans... always thinking that "half to 2/3" of the USA is the same thing as the whole world... :D

    5. Re:It WILL blow up on... by bledri · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Americans... always thinking that "half to 2/3" of the USA is the same thing as the whole world... :D

      Our schools aren't that bad. It would be like 2/3 of the world. Duh.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    6. Re:It WILL blow up on... by this+great+guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      About to blow up ? Naaah. Don't believe them.
      Urgent: sell 2-story home, 4 BR, 2 BA, on 25000 sq. ft property. Located in beautiful Wyoming next to Yellowstone National Park. Grab it while possible !

    7. Re:It WILL blow up on... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Informative? Oh well.

      I guess that will also be the date on which the Canary Islands Tsunami hits, the Al Qaida dirty bomb takes out Washington, and Paris Hilton wins her first Oscar.

      2012 is also predicted to be the year Sarah Palin is elected President. Coincidence? I think not!

    8. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those Mayans were a smart bunch.

      Yup - they figured out how to design a calendar system that would provoke all sorts of speculation and running around in circles in the future.. I nominate the Mayan calendar system for "best troll ever!"

    9. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 1

      It might, just might, have been nerdy about 10 years ago. Darn, I was 12 and already about it.

      Nowadays, if you google that date, you get 1.4 million hits.

      Hollywood, and popular culture in general, has appropriated itself this specific doomsday scenario in order to make the most money out of it.

      Disturbingly capitalistic, I know.

    10. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to add that while referring to that specific date might have been slightly nerdy, to say that the mayans thought it would be the end of the world is a gross misconception.

      Dec 21, 2012 only marks the day where the thirteenth bak'tun (a base-20, 5-digit number) rolls over from 12.19.19.17.19 to 13.0.0.0.0.

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_Long_Count_calendar:

      Susan Milbrath, curator of Latin American Art and Archaeology at the Florida Museum of Natural History, stated that "We [the archaeological community] have no record or knowledge that [the Maya] would think the world would come to an end" in 2012.

      Anonymous for avoiding obvious karma-whoring.

    11. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we don't believe it, therefore it cannot be true.

    12. Re:It WILL blow up on... by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 4, Funny

      And in A.D. 2101, war was beginning.

    13. Re:It WILL blow up on... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, that one's going to go to the Bible or the Quran.

    14. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      That's because they don't have the missing piece.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    15. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Yup - they figured out how to design a calendar system that would provoke all sorts of speculation and running around in circles in the future.. I nominate the Mayan calendar system for "best troll ever!"

      I thought that was religion in general?

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    16. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymatt · · Score: 1

      Valentine's Day. Bummer.

    17. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to this the fact that there are inscriptions dated thousands of years into the future where the Mayans clearly indicated they thought the world would still be around for them to live in (they also thought their civilization would still be thriving- oops). There are absolutely no records of anyone believing the abbreviated Mayan long count signaled the end of the world until some New Age dumbass did some amateur "research" and wrote the book 2012 for all the other New Age dumbasses to gobble up and masturbate to. All common notion of this date's supposed world ending significance can be traced back to this book.

      TL;DR: The whole 2012 thing is nothing more than some New Age bullshit that spiraled out of control and somehow became mainstream. There is no evidence that the Mayans believed the end of the world to fall on this date, and there IS evidence that the Mayans believed the world would still be thriving thousands of years from now.

    18. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be the Torah, the one that started it all...

    19. Re:It WILL blow up on... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they invented the Y2K problem hundreds of years before North American programmers. On Dec 21, 2012, the Mayan calendar will stop working. We need to apply patches to all that Mayan hardware that lying arou... Never mind.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    20. Re:It WILL blow up on... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 0, Troll

      No because the really problematic stuff shows up in the followers of later additions. What did the Jews every do to anybody besides run Germany into the ground and charge interest?

    21. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have been funny if you were modded troll.

    22. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Yellowstone itself is a troll of HIM.
      In a few years it will shake the ground and vent lots of steam, but when it finally opens up and everybody expects lots of hot magna, there will be just a few angels dancing and singing "Never gonna give you up...".
      Prolly with a message: "Special lol at Richards Dawkins: YES, WE MADE YOU !" at the end.

    23. Re:It WILL blow up on... by theascended · · Score: 1

      You Euros, always thinking that blowing up half a continent won't effect you.

    24. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that you mean that the jews were ran into the ground in germany, yes?

    25. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You Americans... always thinking that "half to 2/3" of the USA is the same thing as the whole world... :D

      Well yeah, but you might want to consider if you'd really want to live in a World with the power vacuum created by the instantaneous crippling of the United States combined with a severe shortage of food and natural resources........

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    26. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2012 is also predicted to be the year Sarah Palin is elected President. Coincidence? I think not!

      Shit. We should be worried then. I don't think she can see Yellowstone from her house......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      No, that one's going to go to the Bible or the Quran.

      No vote for the Torah? You anti-semite bastard ;) Where do you think all the "good" parts of the Bible (stoning, raping, pillaging, fire and brimstone) come from?

      The Christian god is a pansy compared to that mean SOB that the Jews follow.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    28. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Thoughts+from+Englan · · Score: 1

      Damn - to late to get us (GB) out of running the olympics.

      --
      That was supposed to be "Thoughts from England" ... Oh well.
    29. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      heh. Yeah, because the world will end when the Mayan calender rolls over to 0, just like all cars stop when the odometer rolls over to 000000. I love doomsday nutters. They're so logical.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I am in for one hell of a 25th birthday...

    31. Re:It WILL blow up on... by He+who+knows · · Score: 1

      Not my birthday please. save me FSM.

    32. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you have to admit, Mayans had first post.

    33. Re:It WILL blow up on... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Should I have put sarcasm tags on it to make my meaning clearer? I was sarcastically saying they were guilty of what the nazis accused them of. Meaning, I meant they weren't guilty, even thought I was literally saying they were. Clear now?

    34. Re:It WILL blow up on... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      But given slow modem speeds of the time, the first troll to post was not necessarily the first troll to be heard.

      Besides, the earliest identifiably mayan scripts date to only 200-300 BCE, so no the Torah (and thus the old testament) had first post.

    35. Re:It WILL blow up on... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 0, Troll

      Was the car made by Microsoft?

    36. Re:It WILL blow up on... by frosky · · Score: 1

      Dec 21, 2012

      in that case, over a century to go:
      21:12:2112 (euro notation)
      -F-

    37. Re:It WILL blow up on... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      She can't see Russia from her house either. The only place in Alaska where you can see Russia is an island in the Aleutians — and Palin's never been there.

    38. Re:It WILL blow up on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone set us up the volcano.

  3. Suddenly... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suddenly the economy doesn't sound like such a big problem after all.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Suddenly... by philspear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you nuts?!? With 2/3 of the country gone, my 401k is going to be completely ruined! RUINED! It would be a financial catastrophe (in addition to an actual catastrophe)!

    2. Re:Suddenly... by yetijoe · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can relocate the politicians and investment bankers to Yellowstone. If it blows a major part of the problem will be eliminated and maybe some common sense can prevail in the recovery.

    3. Re:Suddenly... by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fortunately, I heeded the advice to SELL SELL SELL all of the stocks in my 401(k) portfolio and invest in Guns, Ammo, and Booze. I should be in pretty sweet shape if the Apocalypse occurs in the next few months.

      Peter

    4. Re:Suddenly... by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      Finally I see some logic to the "end times" fiscal policy of the last decade. Live and spend like tomorrow will be your last day on earth!

    5. Re:Suddenly... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      But if the big one blows, what will you do about food and water when you just have Guns, Ammo, and Booze??

      The process of eating and drinking is kind of conducive to human life, and booze is useless as a source of water (doesn't quench thirst or prevent dehydration... does the opposite in fact).

    6. Re:Suddenly... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Towel companies shares should had dropped too. Is a good time to invest in them, that product will have a huge demand soon.

    7. Re:Suddenly... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you have guns and ammo, you can get food and water. The opposite is not true.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    8. Re:Suddenly... by Daswolfen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The process of eating and drinking is kind of conducive to human life, and booze is useless as a source of water (doesn't quench thirst or prevent dehydration... does the opposite in fact).

      Obviously, you didn't think that through. If you have guns, ammo, and booze, then you can use the first two to get food and water.

      Haven't you ever played Fallout?

      The booze is for cleaning the wounds.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    9. Re:Suddenly... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Booze will become a valuable trading commodity.

    10. Re:Suddenly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, man. We need to save gas. Actually we need to keep gas in huge containers, and do our haircuts mohican style, and get some leather jackets and shotguns.
      So, in the after-apocalypse's world we will be the kings of gas, and then all those hot chicks in bikinis will be around us. Didn't you watch Mad Max movies?

    11. Re:Suddenly... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't.

      If you have guns and ammo, while your neighbors do not....you de facto have food and water access.

      See also: Somalia

    12. Re:Suddenly... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      So I couldn't exchange precious priceless necessary supplies that are seriously lacking, for guns and ammo?

      After all, it's pretty much what the US/UK armed forces do in iraq and Afghanistan. The price of rice is higher than the price of an AK-47 in those regions.

    13. Re:Suddenly... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If you have guns and ammo, while your neighbors do not....you de facto have food and water access.

      If you want to ruin your relationship with your neighbors, spend the rest of your life in jail, and suffer severe punishment in the afterlife, sure..

      This only works if your neighbors actually have any food or water. Most people in the US don't ordinarily stock up on useful food.

      Perishables are useless within days (due to loss of power caused by falling ash). And in fact, you can't even really travel to said neighbor's house once there are 6 or 7 feet of ash on the ground both outside and inside your building -- better stay in your air-tight volcano shelter.

      Due to it being pitch black outside AND thick ash in the air preventing you from seeing anything, no matter how bright a flashlight you might have, it's doubtful you even find their building, let-alone find a way in.

      Neigbors don't have to have invested in lots of guns and ammo to shoot you in self-defense with their one gun and small amount of ammo.

    14. Re:Suddenly... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      spend the rest of your life in jail

      I was actually thinking within the frame of reference of a volcano destroying all the civil trappings of developed society.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating the forcible procurement of your neighbors goods. I was simply clarifying the OPP's point, though I'm sure he wasn't serious.

    15. Re:Suddenly... by bladesjester · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, because the people with guns and ammo would be inclined to shoot you and take the precious things from you because you were defenseless.

      You have entirely too much faith in the good nature of your fellow man during times of great turmoil.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    16. Re:Suddenly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's what you think. I'll be part of the "smart guys" group, and we'll be offering food and water in exchange for guns and ammo, and when you come around with a mind to having all four, we'll show you the guns we got from the people with guns and no ammo, and the ammo we got from people with ammo but no guns. Then we'll have your guns and ammo, and your booze, too!

        Always bet on the smart guys to come out on top!

    17. Re:Suddenly... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      I think he was saying exactly the same thing as you.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    18. Re:Suddenly... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      No, he was saying that he could trade food and supplies for guns and ammo.

      I pointed out that, in a situation like that, the holders of the guns are more likely to shoot (or better yet, enslave and force them to continue food production) the holder of the food than trade with them if the food holder is defenseless.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    19. Re:Suddenly... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative

      invest in Guns, Ammo, and Booze

      Just don't use all three at once.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    20. Re:Suddenly... by johanatan · · Score: 0

      So, no one will trade guns and ammo for food and water? I call bs.

    21. Re:Suddenly... by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      Suddenly the economy doesn't sound like such a big problem after all.

      It never was all that big a problem. Yes, it was the largest crash in decades, maybe even since 1929, but the underlying wealth below the crash point was per capita the highest it's ever been. You don't have stockbrokers defenestrating like they did in 1929.

      Also, how long do you puny humans think the party will last? Seriously, if a super volcano doesn't get you, or a planetoid in a rogue orbit, peak oil will fuck everything up.

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    22. Re:Suddenly... by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      Now, having stocked up on guns, ammo and booze, start printing out all the useful info on wikipedia and buying 1940s/1950s medical text books and pre WW1 encyclopaedia.

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    23. Re:Suddenly... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      No, because the people with guns and ammo would be inclined to shoot you and take the precious things from you because you were defenseless.

      *racks slide*, I'll be taking that bottled water and your daughters if you don't mind. Nice doing business with you :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    24. Re:Suddenly... by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      So I'm guessing from your posts that you are a gun owner. Is running a food slave plantation your plan, then?

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    25. Re:Suddenly... by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

      It's already the end of the world. What more could go wrong if I used all three at once?

      Peter

    26. Re:Suddenly... by dkf · · Score: 1

      start printing out all the useful info on wikipedia

      That won't take very long...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    27. Re:Suddenly... by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating the forcible procurement of your neighbors goods. I was simply clarifying the OPP's point, though I'm sure he wasn't serious.

      No, of course not. My 401(k) is still, relatively, intact. In fact, in such a fall of civilization scenario your neighbors will be very valuable to you. Okay, great, I've got an AK-47 and a mountain of ammo and a lake Gin, but I've got to sleep sometimes. Who is going to watch all of my stuff when I'm asleep? My neighbor will, and I'll watch his. It could be like a homeowner's association that doesn't suck.

      The simple reality of it is that in such circumstances I'll probably die, just like everyone else. I live in a rural area, within eyesight of ten enormous grain silos. I have access to well water. But what good is it all to me? Compared to humans from 20,000 years ago, I'm soft. I'm not well adapted for survival. I'm surrounded by acres of wheat fields but I don't know if I could make something edible from raw wheat. I'm a gun owner, but not a hunter. I'd probably make myself sick trying to clean and cook a possum.

      I am just not prepared for something like this.

      Are cats edible?
      How long will ten grain silos feed a town with 10,000 people?
      Why won't this f'ing walnut tree make edible walnuts?!?
      What am I going to do with all of this volcanic ash?
      Why isn't Dish Network working? Volcanoes don't damage satellites.
      Do K&N air filters protect engines from volcanic ash?
      How much gasoline could I get in trade for a MacBookPro?
      How much bleach should I put in water to sterilize it?
      I hope those fucking gophers in the back yard are dead.
      It could be worse. I could still be living in Phoenix.

      Peter

    28. Re:Suddenly... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Is there something wrong with owning, and knowing how to use, weapons?

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    29. Re:Suddenly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you have guns and ammo, you can get food and water. The opposite is not true."

      If I have food and water (as I have), why would I want to swap it for guns and ammo?

    30. Re:Suddenly... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      So I'm guessing from your posts that you are a gun owner. Is running a food slave plantation your plan, then?

      It's an obligation you undertake when you fill out the license application. Or if you get someone who can read and write to fill out the application for you, and just affix your mark to it.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    31. Re:Suddenly... by Apache · · Score: 1

      Actually, the opposite IS true. It just takes thousands of years longer..

    32. Re:Suddenly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corollary proposition: We last saw guns and ammo vs. guns, ammo, and booze on the Russian Front.

    33. Re:Suddenly... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      If you have guns and ammo, you can get food and water. The opposite is not true.

      The opposite IS true, I can grow my own food without guns or ammo.

      Falcon

    34. Re:Suddenly... by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      So I'm guessing from your posts that you are a gun owner. Is running a food slave plantation your plan, then?

      It's an obligation you undertake when you fill out the license application. Or if you get someone who can read and write to fill out the application for you, and just affix your mark to it.

      License application? What license application do you speak of?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    35. Re:Suddenly... by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      If you have guns and ammo, you can get food and water. The opposite is not true.

      The opposite IS true, I can grow my own food without guns or ammo.

      Falcon

      On the other hand, you cannot defend same without guns and ammo.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    36. Re:Suddenly... by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

      After all, it's pretty much what the US/UK armed forces do in iraq and Afghanistan. The price of rice is higher than the price of an AK-47 in those regions.

      One grain of rice costs more than an AK-47?
      --
        Homer the Flanders Killer

    37. Re:Suddenly... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      enough rice to stop you starving to death does know.

    38. Re:Suddenly... by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      There's a license?

      Where do you live?

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    39. Re:Suddenly... by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

      Enough rice to stop you from starving to death for how long?
      --
        Homer the Flanders Killer

    40. Re:Suddenly... by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      psst... that is a secret...
      no need to mention that to people not in the know.. Those feeble minded folks who believe a couple of days of food and water and then the Government will arrive and help are useful sources of supply for those of us who are well equipped...

    41. Re:Suddenly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're allergic to peanuts.

    42. Re:Suddenly... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      There's a license?
      Where do you live?

      In a COUNTRY (damn CapsLock) where the ownership and/ or use of machines which can easily be lethal to other people is controlled, on the assumption that such machines are too dangerous for most people to possess or use. Examples of such machines include motor cars and machine guns. Why chain-saws are not similarly controlled escapes me - perhaps there haven't been too many fatalities resulting from misuse of chainsaws compared to the other example machines.

      Odd that, in this post-Doom world. you'd expect there to be people running through the corridors of Forestry colleges everywhere, chainsawing to death their fellow students.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    43. Re:Suddenly... by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Eh, fair enough.

      Here, our country was founded on the idea that the government gains it authority from the people, and the government should fear us, not the other way around.

      Now, granted, we have strayed far from that, but what vestiges remain are very dear to many of us.

      BTW, where do you live that you have to have a license to own and operate a car? That's just... odd. In the US, you only need license, registration, and insurance for a vehicle if you're driving it on public roads.

      Following your car analogy, I'd be perfectly happy if a permit or license was required to use a firearm on public property. Just stay off my land and my body, and we're in good shape.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    44. Re:Suddenly... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Here, our country was founded on the idea that the government gains it authority from the people, and the government should fear us, not the other way around.

      A laudable theory. But I'd be very careful of the hundreds of thousands of professional soldiers that your government has, well armed, well organised, and most importantly, deeply inculcated with the theory that they obey orders first, and leave worrying about the "rightness" of what they are doing to their "superiors" (in a legal sense, not in any moral sense).

      BTW, where do you live that you have to have a license to own and operate a car? That's just... odd. In the US, you only need license, registration, and insurance for a vehicle if you're driving it on public roads.

      Same here - if you want to own and use a lethal deathtrap of a vehicle, you're free to do so, on private ground. Which is damned all use to man nor beast (OK - that implies that Formula-X racers are neither man nor beast. Trivial case.) as there are very few places where you can actually make productive use of such a machine. If you want to use one for getting from point A to point B, de facto you have to use the public roads. And at that point, you have the choice between getting yourself licensed as a trained driver, your vehicle inspected and certified as being safe for use on the road (an inspection that is only valid at that point in time - it is the driver's personal responsibility to re-check the vehicle before every leg of a journey ; it is perfectly possible for the police to pull a vehicle over and require a re-inspection to the same standards at any time), then you get to pay the vehicle's insurance, and finally the "Road Fund Tax" for actually using it on the highway (you present certificates for vehicle's roadworthiness and insurance status, or you don't get to pay your tax, and the vehicle is not allowed onto the road).

      In theory, none of that is necessary if you're only going to drive your vehicle on private ground, but you'd better be certain that you're not going to drive on or intersect a bridleway (public right of way for people on foot or on horse), a public right of way (for foot), or one of a number of other obstacles such as publicly-owned bridges or tunnels over or under canals or railways (where the same rules apply as on the highway, even if they're disconnected from the highway system), because if you encounter a member of the public and injure them (through crash, or through poor bodywork) then you're not insured and you're in deep shit. Oh, be doubly careful in Scotland (yes, it matters which side of the border you're on ; I don't know which system is followed in Ulster), since there is no such concept as trespass and so anywhere you may meet a member of the public who is there legally. In fact, it'd probably be best if you could document your efforts to fence your private road off, and to post stewards to prevent members of the public from getting onto the road. (Hmmm, that makes me think - exactly what does the KnockHill rally training circuit do about this? Ach, someone else's problem.)

      Following your car analogy, I'd be perfectly happy if a permit or license was required to use a firearm on public property. Just stay off my land and my body, and we're in good shape.

      That'd be fine with me, as long as there was some assurance that your unlicensed weapon, on private land, would remain on private land, and not be pointed off private land (I've forgotten the cases names, but there have been "shooters" who targeted members of the general public from high buildings which may or may not have been on private land. Can't allow that to happen.). A few tenth-kilos of gelignite coupled to a suitably programmed GPS device should do it. Oh, better ensure that if the GPS device loses power, it fails safe by destroying the dangerous device - otherwise it would be trivial to defeat the safety system. (I assume that you're familiar with the concept of "security theatre" - provisions for "security" which are actually ineffectual ; there's no point in designing a system with glaring loopholes in it.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years events by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not? All the mathematical models claimed that the US Financial credit market and the Housing Bubble wouldn't burst at the same time- they calculated that was a once in 75 million years event. Given the luck of the United States lately, a 1/600,000 year event going off right now would just be the icing on the cake.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  5. Can't decide by slugtastic · · Score: 1

    When should I start to panic?

    1. Re:Can't decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After the fact.

    2. Re:Can't decide by PyroPenguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      When should I start to panic?

      My friend Ford Prefect says, "Don't panic"

    3. Re:Can't decide by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please do not panic. Resist the temptation to read or talk to loved ones. Do not attempt sexual relations, as years of TV radiation have left your genitals withered and useless.

    4. Re:Can't decide by David_W · · Score: 1

      Well I'll be damned.

    5. Re:Can't decide by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Do not attempt sexual relations

      End of the world or not, we are still geeks and there are some lines a woman just won't cross (even for the "continuation of the species" argument.)

    6. Re:Can't decide by bone_idol · · Score: 1

      Survival means every man for himself.
      Statistically more people survive if they think only of themselves.
      Do not attempt to rescue friends, relatives, loved ones.

    7. Re:Can't decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use your wheels, it is what they are for.
      If no wheels are available, metal, not organic limbs should be employed wherever possible.

    8. Re:Can't decide by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      And find your towel quickly.

    9. Re:Can't decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell were they doing to need a towel so desperately?

    10. Re:Can't decide by el3mentary · · Score: 1

      and don't forget your towel.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  6. Oblig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new Seismic overlords.

  7. Warning by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, if it's going to be the apocalypse (and I'm not going to be responsible, much to my chagrin), can you just make sure I get a few weeks' notice? There are... things... I want to do.

    1. Re:Warning by slugtastic · · Score: 5, Funny

      50% end-time-discount hookers, call now!

    2. Re:Warning by syousef · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if it's going to be the apocalypse (and I'm not going to be responsible, much to my chagrin), can you just make sure I get a few weeks' notice? There are... things... I want to do.

      Those 'things' are girls and they've already told you they wouldn't have sex with you even if the world were ending.

      Oh wait on second thoughts this is slashdot. You do realize that at the end of the world, no one's going to care if you put out a new beta of your new Robocode robot, even if it is unbeatable.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Warning by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I doubt anyone would have to pay for it if we reach the end of the world.

    4. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why you got marked as a Troll, I found your comment filled with just the dark humor I need to see out this year.

      If this is the big one, what do I want to do before I die? Learn how to paint a self-portrait.

      It won't be the end, though. 1,000 cubic km of lava erupting 50km into the sky would suck as the worst case scenario. The rest of the world would probably find a way to manage if there wasn't a dust winter.

    5. Re:Warning by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Two chicks?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    6. Re:Warning by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      For legal reasons (stupid international treaties), I'm told I shouldn't report most of my list. However, I can state that I don't want anyone in the afterlife being able to say I never vaporized Ann Coulter with a high-powered laser, if you get my drift.

    7. Re:Warning by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      So it's the end of the world as we know it?

      But I feel fine!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:Warning by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      no doubt because money would be worth nothing at such a time since you wouldnt be around much longer to actually enjoy any newfound wealth

    9. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never met my heroin dealer then.

    10. Re:Warning by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      I guess some things have the same answer as "what would you do with a million dollars?"

    11. Re:Warning by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Well, that too. Mostly I was thinking that the total lack of long-term consequences of our actions would definitely free up most people's behavior.

    12. Re:Warning by mandolin · · Score: 1

      You do realize that at the end of the world, no one's going to care if you put out a new beta of your new Robocode robot, even if it is unbeatable.

      Some of us think it's funny you had to actually link to robocode to call out a nerd. Only nerds make jokes they have to explain.

      The rest of us are busy optimizing our movement strategy routines for the next beta.

    13. Re:Warning by syousef · · Score: 1

      Some of us think it's funny you had to actually link to robocode to call out a nerd. Only nerds make jokes they have to explain.

      I'm not sure what's funnier: The irony of abusing someone with the word nerd when you do know what robocode is, or the irony of missing that I'm just trying to appeal to a larger audience. (Even on slashdot, there will be users who've never heard of robocode, couldn't be bothered looking it up, but would follow a link).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  8. my ammo by sirmonkey · · Score: 1

    humm... i don't think my stores of ammo will help with that....
    any one want to sell a nuke battery good for 100 years??

    --
    bored? try this http://jadmadi.net/blog/2005/01/27/linux-wine-how-to-running-windows-viruses-with-wine/
    1. Re:my ammo by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      You can't eat ammo. You can't use ammo to take what is not in existence. Try survival blog sometime it has helpful hints on surviving disasters, out of control government, war and zombies. You know you can grow food? It's startling stuff and so tasty!

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    2. Re:my ammo by sirmonkey · · Score: 1

      i like wild raised deer. mmmmm *drools* i feed them my left overs and such. and then harvest later in the year. that counts as growing.

      ooo yea you met vegies. peanuts are good, thats close right ? :-) p.s. how do you plan on stopping the zombies? i know collie flower is scary stuff but i don't think that will stop them. http://www.freewebs.com/njglazs/preparedness.jpg

      --
      bored? try this http://jadmadi.net/blog/2005/01/27/linux-wine-how-to-running-windows-viruses-with-wine/
    3. Re:my ammo by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Ammo can help you keep that food you are growing for yourself.

    4. Re:my ammo by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Ammo can help you keep that food you are growing for yourself.

      Or help you harvest the food your neighbour is growing for you.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:my ammo by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Sorry my nuclear batteries only last 87.7 years.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-238

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    6. Re:my ammo by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Nope you will lose eventually that is why I consider myself as much of a community survivalist as I can be. I can't fight, grow food, heal myself or do the myriad other things you have to do in bad times.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    7. Re:my ammo by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I meant veggies but meat is good. It's easy to raise squirrels just slowly enrich any woods near you by hacking down dead wood and saturating it with nut trees. There are several woods like that around here if you can keep the trees from being stolen.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    8. Re:my ammo by sirmonkey · · Score: 1

      damn slashdot and the super smarties that roam around here :-p....
      making me look dumb....
      so um err yea... 20% off the price tho? 1kwh unit should be good :-p :-)

      --
      bored? try this http://jadmadi.net/blog/2005/01/27/linux-wine-how-to-running-windows-viruses-with-wine/
    9. Re:my ammo by sirmonkey · · Score: 1

      lol. :-) it also keeps baddies away. and make for loud fireworks :-) (or quite poofs if your a class 3 owner 0:-) )..
      and in a pinch a hole punch :-)

      --
      bored? try this http://jadmadi.net/blog/2005/01/27/linux-wine-how-to-running-windows-viruses-with-wine/
  9. drilling by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder if this could be caused by drilling. There have been cases of volcanic activity triggered by drilling. Of the top of my head, I remember that the Air Force got caught pumping waste chemical weapons into the subsurface under Rock Flats, CO without a permit. They were detected by the increase in earthquakes. Couple that with George Bush's legislation to allow drilling in preserved areas, that Republican mantra of Drill Baby Drill may not have been so smart after all...

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    1. Re:drilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hold on a sec, I need to adjust my tin foil hat to enter this discussion.

    2. Re:drilling by moniker127 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. I could not be. Its a fucking volcano, it erupts when it wants. Don't make one thing about another.

    3. Re:drilling by WiglyWorm · · Score: 1

      Clearly now is the time for even more drilling!

      We shall drill right ON TOP of the supervolcano, thereby relieving the pressure artificially and averting catastrophy.

    4. Re:drilling by dov_0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only problem with reducing the pressure is that the pressure is the only thing keeping it safe.

      A magma chamber apparently has a stack of gasses etc under high pressure. While they're under high pressure they stay in solution, but as soon as the pressure is released, all the gasses come out of solution, rapidly expand and well... #NO CARRIER

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    5. Re:drilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Probably not, but Yellowstone is a very geologically active area, and my first thought when I hear about new activity there (which comes and goes all the time) is of hydrothermal effects.

      There's a lot of water moving around underground there, lots of faults, and lots of heat to drive it. When water or ground moves it can change the pressure in other areas, which may allow existing fractures or faults to slip and cause earthquakes. (The hydrostatic pressure of water and CO2 in cracks in rocks can reduce the effective confining pressure holding the rocks together, so they slip more easily -- understanding fluid effects is critical to understanding earthquakes.)

      It seems like every time there's an earthquake, or change in geyser activity, or some ground inflation, or whatever, the popular press starts barking about gigantic volcanic eruptions. Before you pay attention to them, consider that a volcanic eruption requires molten rock to reach the surface. On its way it will have to push lots of existing rock out of the way, and that rock will have to go someplace, probably up, which we would detect as significant ground inflation. On its way volatiles would be released which we would expect to detect as unusual concentrations of various volcanic gases and changes in water chemistry. Significant changes in the behavior of existing geothermal features would also be expected.

      We also hear a lot about Yellowstone's largest eruptions, but most eruptions are small.

      Interestingly, it has been calculated that as much as almost 1/3 of a cubic kilometer of basalt is intruded beneath Yellowstone each year, which if I recall correctly is similar to the amount entering the magma system beneath Hawaii. In Yellowstone, however, it's trapped beneath a gummy layer of molten silica rich rock which itself eventually erupts and partially accounts for Yellowstone's famously explosive outbursts. The basalt, for its part, tends to cool and solidify underground, over time forming a long track of high density rock that is easy to see on any topographic map of the western US as a feature we call the Snake River Plain, terminating with the Yellowstone Caldera as the head of the snake.

    6. Re:drilling by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      And the fact that the whole caldera had risen 8" over the last 3 years doesn't mean anything without earthquake swarms and the release of volcanic gases... ...oh crap. The article is about earthquake swarms in Yellowstone.

      DUCK AND COVER!

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    7. Re:drilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also throw virgins into it to keep it from "wanting" to erupt?

    8. Re:drilling by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      There have been cases of volcanic activity triggered by drilling.

      There have have there? Please give your references to the peer-reviewed published papers detailing these events. as a professional in drilling, I'd like to know. It's quite important, because there is an Indonesian drilling company trying to get out of law suits concerning demolishing a large part of a town after having an underground blowout, and one of the tactics they're trying is to astroturf a theory blaming the blowout on an earthquake 2 days before the eruption started.

      My fellow drilling professionals consider this claim (and the documentation that has been published to try to back it up) to be somewhere between total bollocks and pretty implausible (yes, there genuinely is debate!). We'd like to see what you know about it.
      (Hint - the people I've discussed this with add up to several centuries of drilling experience and millions of feet drilled. Be prepared to defend your analysis.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    9. Re:drilling by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

      Third Law of Science: If in doubt, poke it with a stick.

  10. Look at the bright side... by Greg_D · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when the global cooling occurs, it'll get Al Gore to STFU for once.

    1. Re:Look at the bright side... by slugtastic · · Score: 1

      Nah, he will be the guy who says "Told you so!" in the end.

    2. Re:Look at the bright side... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Yes, we shoulda killed the manbearpig...

    3. Re:Look at the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully Al Gore's dumb ass is sitting right on top of it when it lets go

    4. Re:Look at the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... when the global cooling occurs, it'll get Al Gore to STFU for once.

      If Al Gore is visiting Yellowstone when it blows, definitely. Too bad, though, if he doesn't live to see his movie become _really_ popular among people suffering global cooling.

    5. Re:Look at the bright side... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Yes!! ManBearPig is real!! He's just in a different underground system than previously thought!! If we could just divert a large enough water source...hmmm...yes...I think 3,942,333,059,383 gallons just might do it...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    6. Re:Look at the bright side... by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the amount of energy involved.

      That amount of water is nowhere *close* enough.

    7. Re:Look at the bright side... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      What?!? We only need enough to fill the empty spaces below ground, then MBP will drown...don't you know anything!?!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    8. Re:Look at the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global warming leads to global cooling jackass.

      Global warming melts all the ice (North pole, Antarctica, Greenland...) which then drastically drops the world wide temps and puts us into an ice age.

    9. Re:Look at the bright side... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Umm... you do realize that it's not compulsory to listen to people whose views irritate you?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Look at the bright side... by bezking · · Score: 1

      Nope. "An Inconvenient Truth 2" will be all about how the earth is getting too cold.

  11. That Would be a Great End to 2008 by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    The year can go out with a... bang!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  12. Thank God for SLBMs abd CVNs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll still have a seat on the Security Council.

  13. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by philspear · · Score: 1

    So because one unlikely thing happened, another unlikely thing is going to happen? I think I see why you're a marxist.

    (kidding of course)

  14. Well damn... by DanWS6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wasn't going to party tonight but this gives me a valid excuse to stop by the liquor store on the way home.

    1. Re:Well damn... by SteveWoz · · Score: 1

      as if you didn't have a valid excuse tonight...

      --
      OK a new size TV
  15. Global Warning by knarfling · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If a volcano erupts, is it considered part of global warming?

    --
    Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
    1. Re:Global Warning by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's more likely to cause global cooling, as TFS and TFA state.

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    2. Re:Global Warning by Mtn453 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would more likely knock out all human life in the USA and burn/melt most of the populated areas of Canada and Mexico. Don't forget it will cause a huge drop in temperature which will cause a mini ice age Doesn't really matter where you are in the world as everyone will most likely starve to death in a couple years anyways. I think it was Mt Toba that went off last time... which dropped the human population down to 10,000 and kicked off a mini ice age 75,000 years ago.

    3. Re:Global Warning by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 5, Funny

      If a volcano erupts, is it considered part of global warming?

      Yes, but only if someone hears it.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    4. Re:Global Warning by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe the point being that if this particular volcano erupts, pretty much everyone will hear it.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    5. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So I take it my recent venture into the ice-cream business could have been a mistake?

    6. Re:Global Warning by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      Uh...

      Yeah, if it increases global temperatures, it's part of global warming. If it doesn't, it's not. There's not much to consider here.

    7. Re:Global Warning by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Ash blocks light, potentially reducing global warming. Volcanic gases can potentially increase global warming. Which will have more effect? Hard to tell before it goes off.

    8. Re:Global Warning by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Informative

      nah, it won't quite be that bad. most predictions expect the immediate danger zone to have a radius of 1000-1600km, with pumice & ash deposit probably covering all of California and most of the Midwest. but rather than being burned, most deaths/injuries will likely be caused by ash inhalation.

      luckily, modern humans have the benefit of science and technology.given enough warning, most people within range of the volcanic explosion and subsequent lava/pyroclastic flow (70,000 to 100,000+ individuals by some estimates) can be evacuated beforehand. everyone else will simply have to stay in doors for a couple of days before they too can be evacuated outside of the ash cover area.

      the USGS seems pretty confident that the YVO monitoring program will detect any premonitory indicators (such as emissions of magmatic gases) of any such impending disaster. and studies indicate that, if there is a volcanic eruption, it is not likely to be a caldera-forming supervolcanic eruption due to insufficient rhyolitic magma-storage to sustain such an event.

      in the event that a caldera-forming eruption takes place, then yes the ash will probably circle the entire globe and lower the temperature in the lower atmosphere for a few years, and that can have a severe impact on the ecology of the planet. but it's certainly survivable. and the chances of such an event actually occurring is still statistically insignificant--contrary to what is often reported, are are not "overdue" for a supervolcanic eruption. (the mean interval between such eruptions is 710,000 years, not 600,000 years.)

      if others are interested, you can read the USGS's report on the Preliminary Assessment of Volcanic and Hydrothermal Hazards in Yellowstone National Park and Vicinity (the actual report is in PDF format).

    9. Re:Global Warning by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep. Major rhyolitic, non-huge-caldera-forming eruptions have a far more statistically significant record than anything you could call "supervolcanic", and are only once every ten thousand years or so on average. Far more common. And most earthquake swarms at Yellowstone have nothing to with upcoming volcanic eruptions.

      Sorry to ruin everyone's doomsday fun. ;)

      --
      Anchor: "We take you now to our Chief Meteorologist, Paris Hilton." Paris: "It's hot." Anchor: "Thank you."
    10. Re:Global Warning by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everyone will starve to death?

      Not quite that level of an apocalypse.

      It'd kill off, say, a few billion people. Places such as Mexico could still farm food, enough to sustain hundreds of thousands of people.
      And the situation would recover fairly quickly - we'd almost certainly see a complete crash of global economy, energy prices soaring like never before and cannibalism becoming a viable survival strategy, but the end of the human rice? Hardly.

    11. Re:Global Warning by Larryish · · Score: 1

      I;m looking forward to some good organic fertilizer in my garden.

      YAYYY volcanic ash.

    12. Re:Global Warning by yacoub · · Score: 1

      It will also kill off nearly all the entire food production of the US, if you notice where the ash coverage boundaries are. Then again, some time down the road the ash will make that soil really fertile... too bad we'll all be dead.

    13. Re:Global Warning by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Funny

      cannibalism becoming a viable survival strategy, but the end of the human rice? Hardly.

      Sometimes typos are beautiful!

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Global Warning by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, pretty easy to tell. In the immediate short term, the global cooling effect of stratospheric ash is FAR stronger. Tambora caused the northern hemisphere to skip a summer in 1816 in case you forgot. Not that the Dalton minimum helped either. It took five years for global temperatures to return to normal after Krakatoa in 1883.

    15. Re:Global Warning by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I spotted that in the preview but let it pass anyway. :P

    16. Re:Global Warning by b4upoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I am warmed and cooled at the same time how will I know what to complain about?

    17. Re:Global Warning by HuckleCom · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you but the farmers up here in the northern midwest often burn their fields after they're done harvesting for the ash and quick 'reset' of the field.

    18. Re:Global Warning by sheepofblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't confuse the end of the world panicky Lemmings with facts...

    19. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The deaf won't. But there will be people from the govt going around making the "BOOM" asl sign.

    20. Re:Global Warning by peragrin · · Score: 1

      don't worry there is always the dust in the air.

      Though complaining while choking is kind of hard.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    21. Re:Global Warning by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      More recently Mt Pinatubo caused a small but measurable drop in global temprature. Several similar events occured in the 20th century, the mesurable effect lasts a few years at most.

      Long term? - During the 20th century mankind's GHG emmissions dwarfed those from volcanos and I suspect our areosols (soot,etc) over the same period have done more to keep a lid on warming than the ash from volcanos.

      Unlike anthropogenic climate change there is nothing much we can do about a volcanos except get out of the way, the fact that humans exist at all demonstrates primates have managed to do that for millions of years. The industrial age has only been going in earnest for a couple of centuries but already it has caused the sixth great extinction.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      People tend to eat nearly as much ice cream in winter as in summer, when the body tends to crave the fat in response to harsher environmental conditions.

      But just to be safe, better add espresso. And liquor. And cigars. And porn.

      You could call it "The Little Vice Age"

    23. Re:Global Warning by JumperCable · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kind of makes the California smoking ban useless.

    24. Re:Global Warning by wetwillyjoe69 · · Score: 0

      If a volcano erupts, is it considered part of global warming?

      Yes, but only if someone hears it.

      Well I think it is backwards. This is the result of global warming. The earth has been heated to the point of creating underground volcano's. Why didn't Al tell us sooner of our self destructive ways?

    25. Re:Global Warning by darkpixel2k · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's more likely to cause global cooling, as TFS and TFA state.

      <VallyGirlVoice>What eeeever. Magma is HOT, dummy.</VallyGirlVoice>

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    26. Re:Global Warning by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      <VallyGirlVoice>What eeeever. Magma is HOT, dummy.</VallyGirlVoice>

      Blast! I mis-typed 'valley', and then cut and pasted my mash of html and text, and the spell-checker chocked on the html. Bah!

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    27. Re:Global Warning by ImOnlySleeping · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the starving. There's always the starving.

      --
      Everybody seems to think I'm lazy I don't mind, I think they're crazy
    28. Re:Global Warning by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, human rice, the perfect food to get you through post-apocalyptic cannibalistic times.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    29. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I take it my recent venture into the ice-cream business could have been a mistake?

      Can I have rocky road in a cinder cone?

    30. Re:Global Warning by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      well, if that does happen then there will certainly be major food shortages around the world and severe infrastructure damage (reservoirs becoming silted up, dams breaking, entire towns covered by meters of ash, power lines in other areas snapping from the weight of ash cover, etc.) in the US, but i think science & technology will prevail. my city happens to be within the ash cover area, but i think the city population would still be able to survive.

      first off, we would need to get respirators and gas masks, then we would have to secure a water supply. next, we'd need to repair the power lines or build our own little power plant. since no one is going to be driving on the roads, we would have plenty of gasoline to run a large gas turbine capable of powering a small community for a couple of years.

      with basic infrastructure restored, we can then focus on securing a food supply. with careful rationing (America is the land of waste and excess after all), existing food supplies that were produced before the disaster would probably last a good year or so. that would be just enough time to establish a local food supply. lack of sunlight and cold weather won't be a problem with a power plant available. it's not too hard to build a greenhouse (or use an existing one) and set up a hydroponic system and grow lamps to produce artificial sunlight & heat.

      it will take some hard work, but it's nothing that a little human ingenuity can't overcome. if anything, it'll encourage people to adopt more sustainable lifestyles, foster cooperation and a sense of community, and create a more efficient and egalitarian society in the long run. if Americans want to survive this kind of disaster, they'll have to learn to cooperate with and help one another. rather than depending on agribusiness and corporate farms hundreds of miles away to produce one's food, local communities will have to get together and set up farming co-ops and learn to be more self-sufficient.

      if this were India, China, or Africa, then there might be a large death toll. but America has a lot more material wealth and natural resources. we also have a more educated population and the technological and scientific knowledge that brings. our biggest challenge is simply overcoming our culture of selfishness and ignorance. if mass hysteria breaks out or society degenerates into lawless chaos, with everyone fighting over immediate resources, each person blindly pursuing their own selfish interests rather than working together, then we probably won't survive. but chances are most communities will be able to make it through such an ordeal.

      personally, i'd travel to the nearest university where there are the highest concentrations of:

      • progressive civic-minded & altruistic individuals
      • intellectuals and knowledgeable experts in assorted fields
      • innovative freethinkers and fresh young minds

      additionally, college campuses have large libraries, digital knowledge repositories, advanced research labs, scientific equipment, and many even have greenhouses and seed banks. so you have the human resources, information resources, and material resources to survive the catastrophe. and you'll also be connected to a global academic network.

    31. Re:Global Warning by Milkyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      evacuated to where exactly? and by whom? you saw what happened to katrina do you really think we're any more prepared for anything like this?

    32. Re:Global Warning by arelas · · Score: 3, Funny

      You would be too hot to handle, yet too cold to hold?

    33. Re:Global Warning by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yep. Major rhyolitic, non-huge-caldera-forming eruptions have a far more statistically significant record than anything you could call "supervolcanic", and are only once every ten thousand years or so on average. Far more common. And most earthquake swarms at Yellowstone have nothing to with upcoming volcanic eruptions.

      Sorry to ruin everyone's doomsday fun. ;)

      Still, it would be a good plot for a Roland Emmerich movie. IMax 3D, for sure, so you can watch the pyroclastic flow hit you in the face.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    34. Re:Global Warning by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The deaf won't.

      No ... but they'll feel it, like a giant volcanic woofer.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    35. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ". . . people within range of the volcanic explosion . . . can be evacuated beforehand." That's kind of gross.

    36. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I;m looking forward to some good organic fertilizer in my garden.

      YAYYY volcanic ash.

      But...volcanic ash is inorganic.

      So where would the organic fertilizer come from? Are you planning to go out into your garden and inhale deeply during the ash fall?

    37. Re:Global Warning by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Whatever, Mr Buzzkill.

    38. Re:Global Warning by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    39. Re:Global Warning by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      The last super eruption 74,000 years ago supposedly caused a
      genetic bottleneck and wiped out 90+% of all life on the planet.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    40. Re:Global Warning by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keep in mind "The year without a summer" was a Volcanic Winter
      that was small by comparison.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_without_a_summer

      Scale up the results accordingly and you can see why the
      Toba Catastrophe Theory is only a theory because no one
      recorded data on the results that we have found.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    41. Re:Global Warning by Nafai7 · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, Mr Pie-in-the-sky ... I personally just went and bought a few more cans of corn just in case.

      Also, some foil-reinforcements for my hat.

    42. Re:Global Warning by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      Climate patterns do have an effect on geological activity. Mostly with the pressure of water on land, and its distribution changing.

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    43. Re:Global Warning by powerlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ong term? - During the 20th century mankind's GHG emmissions dwarfed those from volcanos and I suspect our areosols [wikipedia.org] (soot,etc) over the same period have done more to keep a lid on warming than the ash from volcanos.

      Maybe ... but I still remember being in Hawaii and being informed that the volcanoes there would qualify as the #1 environmental polluter if it had been a factory.

      Apparently the fact that it was a "natural system" let it off the hook, but you still didn't want to be downwind of the Vog (Volcano Fog).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    44. Re:Global Warning by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Well, there's Bush for the next few days, anyway....

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    45. Re:Global Warning by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Given the advent of civilization and the development of technology since then, I think we'd fare better this time around. But let's hope we don't need to find out.

      (Also, it was probably 90% of humanity rather than all life. I don't even think the Permian mass extinction killed that many organisms, and that was by far the worst die-off in the history of life on this planet).

    46. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's hot

    47. Re:Global Warning by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you saw what happened to katrina do you really think we're any more prepared for anything like this?

      Despite the bunging of Katrina's aftermath, what I saw in *advance* of Katrina was quite useful. The Mayor BEGGED people to leave town on local television. Everybody had several days' warning, they just chose not to leave. And it's the idiots that didn't leave that were starving, peeing on and raping each other in the stadium a week later.

      It would be terrible if it happened - I have a good friend in Montana, but if warnings were as good as Katrina's, I'd be just fine. As a Californian, if I see Arnie telling NorCal folks to bail, I'm gone in 60 seconds, with my kids in the back, laptop and backup drives in hand!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    48. Re:Global Warning by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It won't "burn/melt most of the populated areas of Canada and Mexico", not even close. The magma/lava discharge will simply stay in and around the area of Yellowstone +/- at most 100 miles (heck, the longest known magma/lava flow in the solar system is only ~160 miles, and that is on Jupiter's moon, Io). The only thing that people outside that area have to worry about is ash and volcanic gasses which will be discharged. Unfortunately, the jet stream will force that eastward across the USA (and around the world, in the event of a major eruption). Get your facts straight. And the people modding the parent up for informative should also get their facts straight...

      There is also no direct evidence that the eruption of Mt Toba was the cause of the drop in human population. For all we know there could have been a major epidemic which was highly contagious which would slowly kill someone over the course of a year or more (think something like an AIDs virus which was transmitted simply by close contact, not sexually transmitted). We simply don't know for certain. We are now, however, much more technologically capable of dealing with a mini-ice age if it was triggered by an event like this. While it would be difficult, if we really had to work for something, we would develop filters for removal of the particles of ash and soot in the air, and eventually also devise methods to remove or trap the volcanic gasses.

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    49. Re:Global Warning by j.+andrew+rogers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interestingly, when St. Helens erupted, the majority of the ash fell in a relatively small agricultural region. I know, I lived right in the middle of that farm country at the time. When it happened, everyone assumed a total loss for the year, since the ground was caked in inches of the ash cement. The region looked like a wasteland, and mobility was very limited.

      But the agricultural disaster never happened. The crops bounced back with a vengeance and produced spectacular record yields. Not just for that year, but for several years thereafter. It turns out that the several inches of ash acted as incredible fertilizer and helped the soil retain moisture, and the crops poked their way through the ash after a couple good rains. Most of the US would get that kind of dusting of ash across its agricultural belt, and while there might be some cooling it will likely be offset in part by a massive agricultural rebound that compensates for a significant part of it. We expected the worst when St. Helens erupted, but the reality was far less than that in terms of food production.

    50. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheers to a rational explanation. Yes, there would be pain - but we'd survive and hopefully learn the needed lessons to become a stronger species.

    51. Re:Global Warning by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a lot of stupid for one sentence. If there was any more stupid or it was any smaller it would collapse in on itself and become an intelligence black hole. I'll try and explain the major stupidities since explaining them all would take far too long.

      For starters if global temperatures rise, for any reason whatsoever it's called "global warming". Global warming, in itself, doesn't imply any connection with humans. So yeah, anything that increases the global temperature would be part of it.

      Though, of course, your stupidity doesn't stop there. Volcanoes spew tons of ash which block out the Sun. Since the extent (or lack of) intelligence is in question I'll mention that the Sun is the main source of heat, without that everything gets very cold. For an example of what happens when a very large, but not super-, volcano erupts check out what happened in 1816.

      It bears mentioning that it's not the friendly ash that comes from burning wood, paper, and other things, it's actually tiny shards of powdered rock. Perfect for turning into cement inside wet lungs and ripping airplane and car engines to shreds.

      The range of possible scenarios the OP mentioned is too small. It could cover much more than two thirds of the continental US, and it could cover much less than one half.

    52. Re:Global Warning by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Funny

      People tend to eat nearly as much ice cream in winter as in summer, when the body tends to crave the fat in response to harsher environmental conditions.

      But just to be safe, better add espresso. And liquor. And cigars. And porn.

      in fact, forget the espresso and the cigars

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    53. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Soylent green is... rice?!

    54. Re:Global Warning by thebes · · Score: 0

      Don't worry though...Bono will save them!

    55. Re:Global Warning by nitroamos · · Score: 1

      I was near Mt Pinatubo when it blew. Ash was falling on us, but we weren't concerned about inhaling it... If that were a problem, you could just use an umbrella...

      The problem was that the ash mixed with a typhoon passing by, and raining wet ash is a problem because it turned into dangerous sand-rivers. And, it ruined crop fields. In all, it hardly seemed like a big deal.

      Certainly this volcano could be bigger, but I doubt it would make a great movie.

    56. Re:Global Warning by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Lament for the lack of mod points.....

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    57. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude...chill!

    58. Re:Global Warning by nugx · · Score: 1

      Thank you for having the only comment on the entire page that actually put my mind to ease.

    59. Re:Global Warning by malice · · Score: 5, Funny

      personally, i'd travel to the nearest university where there are the highest concentrations of:

      progressive civic-minded & altruistic individuals
      intellectuals and knowledgeable experts in assorted fields
      innovative freethinkers and fresh young minds

      Awesome. I'll travel to meet up with some hunter friends of mine who have guns and wilderness survival skills... we'll shoot you and your newly found progressive buddies, eat your vegetables, and have a long pig BBQ!

    60. Re:Global Warning by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Informative

      small amounts of volcanic ash might only irritate your lungs, but if a supervolcanic eruption took place, it would likely throw up tremendous amounts (~1000 cubic miles) of tephra/pyroclast, the finest particles of which could circle the globe and remain suspended in the atmosphere for years. if you're immediately downwind from such an eruption, you'd be breathing in heavy amounts of what is essentially microscopic shards of broken glass for weeks or months.

      archaeological evidence has been uncovered showing that the mass deaths of plains animals 12 million years ago during a supervolcanic explosion at Yellowstone were due primarily to lung disease from volcanic ash inhalation. even many animals that survived the initial ashfall were still killed by the ash stirred up by their own movements or wind.

    61. Re:Global Warning by moose223 · · Score: 1

      And the starving. There's always the starving.

      I suppose it will take a while for some people to switch over to cannibalism. Happy New Year!

    62. Re:Global Warning by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Isn't that how Java can sustain its population density?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    63. Re:Global Warning by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yea, i'm sure your wilderness survival skills will come in real handy when you're dying of silicosis & respiratory failure.

      i mean, a supervolcano just covered the western half of the United States in ash fall, and the first thing you think to do is to grab a gun and go outside and head into the wilderness? here's a tip for you and your hunter friends with "wilderness survival skills": when the global temperature has just dropped by 20+ degrees, it's better to stay indoors.

      and you also won't be needing your guns (well, assuming you're not in the small minority of the population who freaks out during stressful situations turning into homicidal sociopaths) as there will be plenty of freshly killed animals in the first few weeks following the eruption. and after that there won't be any game left for you to hunt--but hey, cannibalism is always an option!

    64. Re:Global Warning by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When the volcano erupts it makes a lot of the petty things we care about today seem insignificant.

      How bad an eruption will be depends also on the type of ash that gets ejected. And it will probably be worse for those living east of that eruption since the majority of the ash will be carried east on the jetstream.

      A major climate change caused by an eruption will cause great changes in where crops can be grown and which types of crop that you can grow. The changes in climate will cause major migration of people, war and famine. I suspect that equatorial regions will be the least affected by this while regions like the US, Canada, Europe and Northern Asia will be a very tough area to live in. Inuits moving to Florida?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    65. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People tend to eat nearly as much ice cream in winter as in summer, when the body tends to crave the fat in response to harsher environmental conditions.

      Thanks for that. My family owns a restaurant, and we actually see the sales of ice-cream products go up during the winter months (and summer, for obvious reasons - during spring and fall the sales drop). My theory was that seeing snow and ice on the ground, combined with hunger, somehow triggered a desire for something frosty and tasty. That explanation makes a lot more sense.

    66. Re:Global Warning by zoney_ie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know if a localised calamity was due to affect a city here in Ireland, we would have the national bus operator's fleet transferred to special trips for evacuation, and similarly full trainloads would be organised to other cities and emergency facilities. The government would reemburse the transport operators from tax money - because we all pay taxes (yes, even the unemployed thanks to our regressive indirect taxation of 21.5% sales tax and direct charges for just about everything). Ireland is kinda US-looking, so I guess you would get a bunch of morons on the other coast complaining about the cost (despite the fact they would be quite in favor of such action if the calamity affected them instead - and the fact the country would be rather worse off with a sudden wiping out of so many citizens).

      It seemed crazy to me that in the New Orleans situation, it was expected of everyone to get out under their own steam by private car or regular transport. Even for many who did have private cars, it should have been preferable for them to be specifically evacuated by special mass transit services. There should *never* have been a need to provide "centres of last resort". Anyone left should have been forcably evacuated. Of course some people's reluctance to leave is an indictment of the ability of the forces of law and order to protect people's property (i.e. from thieves rather than natural forces) even under normal circumstances in the US.

      It seemed like they did things more along the correct lines the second time around (masses of special bus services, etc.), but it's actually distressing that they didn't get it right first time around when it was not an unanticipated problem.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    67. Re:Global Warning by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would depend on the time of year. If the ash fell while the crops were growing, then it would block them from getting the sun and crush them, killing them very effectively and eliminating a year's yield. If it fell at another time, it would just fertilise the soil.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    68. Re:Global Warning by Socguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Mayor BEGGED people to leave town on local television. Everybody had several days' warning, they just chose not to leave. And it's the idiots that didn't leave that were starving, peeing on and raping each other in the stadium a week later.

      That statement is incredibly offensive. Yes there were some 'idiots' that chose not to leave, however, the majority of the people who ended up "peeing on and raping each other in the stadium" were the poor and the elderly and the sick of New Orleans who didn't have the resources to leave or the resources to stay anywhere else even if they could get out.

      Strangely enough, most of the people who did manage to have the resources to get out were the white folks. When you take the fact that the government rescue effort was abysmal at best and didn't really get rolling until the airwaves were blanketed by some pretty ugly imagery, some might even speculate that 'George Bush hates black people'. Of course I would never ascribe to malice what can be explained by incompetence. All the same, it seems like a sad state of affairs when the preferable alternative is multiple levels of sheer incompetence.

    69. Re:Global Warning by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Yeah... too bad America has proven it can't mobilize itself in case of some natural disaster. It's enough to see what happened in New Orleans and how fast it's being rebuilt.

    70. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most people within range of the volcanic explosion and subsequent lava/pyroclastic flow (70,000 to 100,000+ individuals by some estimates) can be evacuated beforehand. everyone else will simply have to stay in doors for a couple of days before they too can be evacuated outside of the ash cover area.

      Or just Duck and Cover

    71. Re:Global Warning by xombo · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am worried most about global temperature stability.

    72. Re:Global Warning by rdnetto · · Score: 2, Funny

      <VallyGirl2Voice>But then it would all, like, cool down, like food does when its, like, heated. Maybe it would, like, cool too much? Oh no! What if I'm not hot anymore? (feints)</VallyGirl2Voice>

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    73. Re:Global Warning by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      our biggest challenge is simply overcoming our culture of selfishness and ignorance. if mass hysteria breaks out ... then we probably won't survive.

      Dude, you guys are totally screwed. I'm glad I live Down Under. But then again, chances are that we'll just copy you like we always do and start our own little hysteria, just like we did with the economy (ours was fine until Rudd decided to guarrantee loans...)

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    74. Re:Global Warning by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      This is awesome! The eruption's going to weed out the idiots! And as an extra plus, I foresee Linux's marketshare going up :)

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    75. Re:Global Warning by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, our problem here is we can be bussed a maximum of about 150 miles before we run out of land :)

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    76. Re:Global Warning by Mozk · · Score: 1
      --
      No existe.
    77. Re:Global Warning by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Would that sign be running around frantically, flailing your arms, and mouthing OH SHIT?

      --
      No existe.
    78. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is this little problem of milk, coffee, wheat and tobacco production fall under an ice-age. Porn is the one to go, especially since it encourages people to share body heat.

    79. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Co-eds, an apocalypse just isn't any fun without the 'repopulating the earth' part.

    80. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which group was it you were in? If the size of the market is cut in half by a disaster *NO ONES* market share is going up at all, for a very long time.

    81. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So I take it my recent venture into the ice-cream business could have been a mistake?

      Your production costs will be minimal, at least.

    82. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you expect civil society and all it's benefits to remain intact during a predicted doomsday scenario of this size, you're either being idealistic or truly naive.

      Resources and staff for police and law enforcement will be diverted to even more important events and projects, and the remainder will not be sufficient everywhere.

      It won't be total lawless anarchy, but way too few officers for a lot of people in a way too large county. Which is ironically resembling the "Wild West" society model of former times.

      I don't want to dive too deep into the Nerds vs. Jocks contest you just entered. For any thinkable doomsday scenario, having a manageable-sized group of healthy adults with a very diverse skillset is probably the best preparation.

      Nevertheless, people without real physical or directly applicable theoretical skills could be dead weight, though, when the current situation requires immediate self-defense against predators or nature and self-procurement of foodstuffs.

      Society has to be pretty stable and evolved to make good use of people with majors in comparative literature or liberal arts and sciences.

      Note that I'm not saying they are useless for wealth creation, but their primary fields of education are pretty limited when society is in a state that bears, hurricanes, thugs or hordes of refugees are literally knocking at the door.

    83. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's great as long as you don't get those 'B' actors. They really kill a good TV movie.

    84. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the plus side we can then stop worrying about global warming and Al Gore, San Francisco, Prius, Green technology, and everything else realted will be out of fashion. We can then burn as much shit as we want. Oh wait.. thats not us the people on the other side of the globe.

    85. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Katrina was not a localized calamity and the potential Yellowstone event would certainly not be, either.

      Let's play Civ for a while: Imagine all members of society have just elected you as their Dear Leader and granted you with all available executive, legislative, judiciary powers and you can employ all resources of the state including insane bank loans and slave labor of Ancient Egyption proportions.

      For the Yellowstone scenario, you have 10 days of advance warning and you need to move at least 50 million people at least 1000km or more. Your goal is to to have 40 million people survive reasonably healthy for 30 days. How do you do THAT?

    86. Re:Global Warning by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      the poor and the elderly and the sick of New Orleans who didn't have the resources to leave

      Of course they had the resources. There was a fleet of school buses sitting right there, and it could have spent three days shuttling most of the city's population above sea level. The federal government doesn't control those city resources, and doesn't need to. The MAYOR of the city is in charge of that sort of thing, and was (and remains) an idiot. He also lacked the courage to simply call upon his own state's governor to help with the same activity. Preparedness for storms in cities and states that see hurricanes every year is the responsibility of the people who choose to live there, and the local governments that they elect. The people of New Orleans and the useless people they had elected to manage their cities and emergency preparedness are to blame. Period.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    87. Re:Global Warning by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, most of the people who did manage to have the resources to get out were the white folks. When you take the fact that the government rescue effort was abysmal at best and didn't really get rolling until the airwaves were blanketed by some pretty ugly imagery, some might even speculate that 'George Bush hates black people'. Of course I would never ascribe to malice what can be explained by incompetence. All the same, it seems like a sad state of affairs when the preferable alternative is multiple levels of sheer incompetence.
      Well, I don't see what George Bush has to do with Katrina. It is not the Federal Governments responsibility to take care of local disasters. The Federal Government may providing funding to local agencies should they decide the disaster warrants it, which they did. Then the local agencies and local governments are expected to take care of the issue. How can we criticize Bush for not doing enough when he was not required to do anything at all? There was no Federal aid for the Great Chicago Fire which also affected many poor people, most of them white. Nobody seems to have faulted Grant for not having the Federal Government rebuild Chicago.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    88. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't remember hearing anything about evacuation officers disallowing people to board because of their skin color. It would've been all over the news for weeks, even for a single isolated event.

      I DO remember, however, that of most people who actively REFUSED to be evacuated were from predominantly black quarters. It was suggested they were trying to protect their property from burglars.

      I also DO remember who was the predominant group among the school bus drivers who did NOT appear when they were all be called to evacuate people en masse. It has been suggested, that they were also at home protecting their property.

      Now it's a questionable choice when people prefer to protect your TV set over being evacuated to safety - and an even more questionable decision to NOT show up on your duty as an evacuation bus driver and rather protect your TV set. In any case, the choice to rather die or let other people die than let someone break into your house is purely personal, and certainly independent of George W. Bush's skills or lack thereof - or anyone else's, for that matter.

      But I'm sure there is a plausible explanation why some people who were supposedly "staying at home to protect their property" were later seen looting and ransacking property of those who evacuated.

      When the televised results of absurdly wrong personal choices make some people speculate if "George W. Bush hates black people", one could reasonably well speculate if "black people hate Walmart", because that's what it looked like on TV.

      One could still argue that many people would loot an unprotected Walmart Superstore given the chance, regardless of their skin color. But then again, where were the poor people who are not black? Did they somehow catch the Whites-only buses from 1962 or did they stay at home, protecting their TV, listening to country music with their rifles and bibles in hand?

      It's all probably a giant conspiracy when they filmed the looted Walmart with all looters being black by pure chance. That black POLICE OFFICER who seemed busy looting the store with all the others probably was casted for this role, her threat to use her gun if the camera team wouldn't stop filming well rehearsed to sound surprised and convincing.

    89. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Society has to be pretty stable and evolved to make good use of people with majors in comparative literature or liberal arts and sciences.

      Note that I'm not saying they are useless for wealth creation, but their primary fields of education are pretty limited when society is in a state that bears, hurricanes, thugs or hordes of refugees are literally knocking at the door.

      You would want somebody to educate your children to think especially in the time of crisis. And you would want to have some light entertainment for that More Enjoyable Apocalypse (r).

    90. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you're right. But in imminent and physical danger, that person better have some other skills to make up for eating all the rations. Cooking, repairing, medical or upper body strength, heck even comic relief would be sufficient. But light entertainment is only needed against low but constant danger OR in a truly un-survivable event.

    91. Re:Global Warning by damburger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you expect civil society and all it's benefits to remain intact during a predicted doomsday scenario of this size, you're either being idealistic or truly naive.

      In WW2, only 15% of soldiers actually shot at the enemy - and they were under fire and had been explicitly trained to kill. Even in a truly life-or-death situation, humans are not nearly as violent as disaster melodramas like to make out.

      In times of hardship and disaster, the default mode of most humans is cooperation not competition. People pull together in hard times, which can be verified in Britain by talking to people alive during the war.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    92. Re:Global Warning by Miststlkr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have clearly not been to New Orleans, have you? There is a huge majority of black people, whites are the minority. If you set a camera in front of a Walmart at any time it will likely still look like all black people were shopping/looting/malingering/loitering/shopping/shopping/smoking/walking-past there. It's just the way the racial distribution works there. Adding to that the fact that seemingly a majority of the white folk live in the better neighborhoods like the Garden District [where I lived, which had no water damage, BTW...] and the fact that property is and has been CHEAPER IN THE LOWEST PARTS OF TOWN... go figure... guess who lived in the most affected areas? Hey.. the lower income families! The water didn't care what color your skin was.

    93. Re:Global Warning by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      The FA doesn't say that it would wipe out 1/2 to 2/3's of the US. It says that it would blanket as much as 1/2 with ash. Those are two very different things. It would be very nasty though, no doubt about it. The eastern seaboard of the US, where most of the population is, would probably not be burning / melting, sorry. Ditto for Canada with populations mostly on the far coasts, nowhere close.

    94. Re:Global Warning by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't forget guns
      A) people will want the guns more than anything else you have - well, maybe not the porn.

      B) you'll need them to defend your stuff from other people with guns.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    95. Re:Global Warning by Eudial · · Score: 1

      Interesting... is there any way to hook up the Yellowstone volcano to a stereo?

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    96. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> luckily, modern humans have the benefit of science and technology.given enough warning,

      You mean like all those modern humans who reject the science of global warming? Do you really think that they'll leave their comfy houses just because some commie scientist says so? How un-American.

    97. Re:Global Warning by Noren · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, let's take an example from the past and compare speed of federal government response. How about the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906? Surely we've improved since then. Here's a bit of the timeline:

      April 18, 1906: 5:13 a.m. Earthquake hits
      A messenger arrived at Ft. Mason at 6:30 a.m. with orders from Gen. Funston to send all available troops to report to the mayor at the Hall of Justice.
      First army troops from Fort Mason reported to Mayor Schmitz at the Hall of Justice around 7 a.m.
      At 8 a.m., the 10th, 29th, 38th, 66th, 67th, 70th and 105th Companies of Coast Artillery, Troops I and K of the 14th Cavalry and the First, Ninth and 24th Batteries of Field Artillery arrived Downtown to take up patrol.
      War Department received a telegram from Gen. Funston at 8:40 p.m., Pacific Coast time, that asked for thousands of tents and all available rations. Funston placed the death toll at 1000.
      April 19, 1906
      Secretary of War Taft at 4 a.m. ordered 200,000 rations sent to San Francisco from the Vancouver Barracks.
      Secretary Taft ordered all hospital, wall and conical tents sent to San Francisco from army posts at Vancouver; Forts Douglas, Logan, Snelling, Sheridan and Russell, from San Antonio and the Presidio of Monterey.
      Secretary Taft wired Gen. Funston at 4:55 a.m. that all tents in the U.S. Army were en route to San Francisco.

      The Federal government did a better job helping after a disaster in 1906- even in the first 24 hours- than they did about a century later.

    98. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally I might think your a government shill. Pushing their research paper and all. Then I noticed your name - "lysergic.acid" This lowered my concerns slightly.

    99. Re:Global Warning by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

      Umm...you do appear to have a bit of an issue about race, don't you?

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    100. Re:Global Warning by mwilliamson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know how to make beer, so will bring the beer to the BBQ. I hear slow roasted long pig goes well with a good cold brew.

    101. Re:Global Warning by gcalvin · · Score: 1

      Everyone will starve to death?

      Not quite that level of an apocalypse.

      It'd kill off, say, a few billion people. Places such as Mexico could still farm food, enough to sustain hundreds of thousands of people.
      And the situation would recover fairly quickly - we'd almost certainly see a complete crash of global economy, energy prices soaring like never before and cannibalism becoming a viable survival strategy, but the end of the human rice? Hardly.

      Dude, have a sandwich before you post -- you're scaring me.

    102. Re:Global Warning by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Sometime soon, if some holes were drilled to relieve the pressure, maybe we'd all feel more comforted. Suppose it was a different disaster being predicted like a comet. We'd be talking about taking action.

      What can be done? Maybe vent holes, maybe cut a large slice away, maybe build shelters, maybe just move away while the going's easy...

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    103. Re:Global Warning by alexj33 · · Score: 1

      Can it be somehow taxed? If so, then yes.

    104. Re:Global Warning by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually they were supposed to use the fleet of school and municipal Buses to assist the evacuation per their local emergency plans, but they kept the buses locked up until they flooded. Bush's biggest mistake was not declaring a Federal state of emergency and remove the ineffective the mayor and governor from the command loop and Federalizing the National Guard and Police.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    105. Re:Global Warning by warGod3 · · Score: 1

      So this might make some people happy about possibly solving the illegal immigration problem?

      --
      "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
    106. Re:Global Warning by nugx · · Score: 1

      The Midwest is full of white people. The Government might respond differently.

    107. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Well, it wasn't the tooth fairies that did not show up for evacuation duties and it wasn't the tooth fairies looting Walmart, either.

      You may very well argue about the possible REASONS there were only black people looting the store, but not dispute the fact that they were.

      You could've speculated on the whereabouts of poor white people during these times or dig up a news link where black people REALLY WERE intentionally or negligently left behind in a large scale evacuation.

      But you didn't. You decided to attack me for reminding us of these unfortunate TV scenes, but that doesn't make them any less real. In fact, you could've said anything about me and you would still have said effectively nothing.

      You could very well load up YouTube, watch the videos of the Katrina events and then decide again on what part of your opinion is and what may be wishful thinking.

      It may be against the politically correct handbook of communication to discuss doubleplusungood arguments and instead attack the messenger. If you can win with arguments, you're defending a valid idea. If you need insults, cencorship or even force, chances are you're defending an ideology.

    108. Re:Global Warning by Zaak · · Score: 1

      One of the most telling signs of unpreparedness for Hurricane Katrina was flooded parking lots full of school buses.

    109. Re:Global Warning by nitroamos · · Score: 1

      I am not a volcanologist, but my experience suggests this "microscopic shards of glass" is an overreaction. This article says that Mt Pinatubo released 4 cubic kilometers (= 1 cubic mile) of ash (= < 2 mm tephra). We were within 25 miles of it (we drove from Baguio to Manila that day), while it was blowing up, and nobody complained about breathing it in, and I never heard any discussion of respiratory problems... Actually, I remember standing outside watching the stuff fall down and asking my parents if it was snow. Amusement turned to concern only when it began sticking to our windshield (it was wet), forcing our driver to keep his head out the window, with sunglasses and an umbrella. On that day, we crossed bridges that collapsed shortly afterwards.

      Granted, 1000 cubic miles is a lot more, but it will probably spread over a greater area too. My message is sure, get dust masks. But worry more about the roof of your house collapsing. Maybe bridges too. And, regarding one of those articles about water scarcity, I think a coffee filter should strain out the ash, if it came to that.

      Come to think of it, people are able to survive dust storms just fine, which on a local scale, are probably worse than what a volcano would kick up. So maybe we should just ask the bedouins what to do.

    110. Re:Global Warning by rick1027 · · Score: 1

      interval between such eruptions is 710,000 years, not 600,000 years

      I might feel better if you could give me the standard deviation for that.

    111. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because you can rationalize your racism without insults, censorship, or even force doesn't mean that it isn't real. We choose to see what we're looking for whether we're intelligent enough to defend our ideologies with 'sound' argument or lack the skills needed & resort to ad-hominum attacks.

      Just a PSA.

    112. Re:Global Warning by westlake · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'll travel to meet up with some hunter friends of mine who have guns and wilderness survival skills... we'll shoot you and your newly found progressive buddies, eat your vegetables, and have a long pig BBQ

      Which will keep you alive for what?

      Six weeks, six months?

      Guns need powder and ammunition. Lubricating oils. Spare parts.

      Game becomes hard to find. Edible plants, fruits, nut and berries become hard to find.

      You will need to forage constantly across greater and greater distances.

      Are you sure that mushroom is safe to eat?

      Captain John Smith, who knew something about survival, published a list of provisions he thought essential for every immigrant to Virginia: basically, a year's supply of everything.

      Enough food to eat, so you will never be tempted to dip into to your seed stocks. The hunt will be hard work, not sport, and you are not as good with a gun as you think you are.

      Bring fishooks. Learn how to fish.

      Bring clothes for all seasons. Hammer and nails, axes, planes and saws. Build quickly and build well. The winter will be longer and harsher than any you have known.

      Bring animals. Layers. Breeding stock. Shelter them. Protect them.

    113. Re:Global Warning by NIckGorton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1) Commandeer the newsmedia and make the following policy announcements:
      2) All major highways out of the area in question will be made unidirectional for 5 days (with a one lane exception for police/military/fuel supply). If you have a car/van/MC/etc and wish to leave with it, you must do so within the next 5 days.
      3) National guard/army/police will be at crucial checkpoints inspecting vehicles. Any vehicle without one passenger for every seat will not be allowed to pass. However, people without vehicles (such as the poor who were left during Katrina) may assemble at these sites and will be offered a seat in your car/van/etc if it is not full.
      4) If you refuse to take assigned passengers and/or refuse to eject possessions to do so, your vehicle will be commandeered and given to a car-less driver.
      5) On the 6th day all roads will be shut down to personal vehicles and the roads become bidirectional.
      6) On days 6-10 buses (and semis capable of hauling people in the trailer) will begin making round trips to evacuate as many of the remaining people as possible. Only vehicles capable of carrying at least 10 people will be allowed on the road.
      7) Continued refusal to comply and/or seriously disruptive behavior will result in you being shot on site (both because the delay or misuse of resources you are causing will threaten the lives of others and absolute order is essential to getting as many people out as possible.)
      8) The seriously infirm (i.e. nursing home patients, people in the ICU/on vents in hospitals, people who have a less than 6 month life expectancy due to cancer/etc) will not be transported out. If supplies are available and these people consent, euthanasia should be offered by health care workers. To prevent too much hysteria though, during the first 5 days, if you can schlep your family member, they can go in your car/van/suv.
      9) All people living outside the 1000km radius will have people assigned to inhabit their living spaces and will be required to accommodate them until more habitable space is available for them. (#7 applies outside of the 1000km radius as well.)

      Of course this assumes I have those dictatorial powers. And this certainly would not get everyone out, but I think it would do the most good for the most possible. Though just instituting #3 would have saved hundreds of lives and the suffering of thousands during Katrina.

    114. Re:Global Warning by Raenex · · Score: 1

      In WW2, only 15% of soldiers actually shot at the enemy

      I find this to be an extremely dubious number, and having looked around, there's plenty of debate around it. There's a long thread about it here:

      http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=48;t=000511;p=1

    115. Re:Global Warning by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It comes from research conducted by the US army, which contrary to what one nut on snopes says hasn't been debunked; the reason kill rates have gone up is because, with a better understanding of the psychology of killing, military training programmes have changed.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    116. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, it would be a good plot for a Roland Emmerich movie. IMax 3D, for sure, so you can watch the pyroclastic flow hit you in the face.

      I think you will find yourself pleasantly surprised by how accurate you are in your Roland Emmerich predictions. Posting AC because I'm working on it now.

    117. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      In WW2, all soldiers were in a tight hierarchy and a clearly defined order existed even if only on paper. Everyone had their rank displayed on their shoulder, superiors and subordinate soldiers were unmistakeably set. And then they had a common, clearly defined enemy and the memory and hope of coming home. They were given (some) tools, (some) advice and (some) overall meaning.

      In a society breakdown, you have NONE of that outside the governmental organizations and those are not everywhere.

      Humans default mode is cooperation, of course - but then there's the anti-socials. And 10 anti-socials can pull a whole city into problems, even WITH a fully functional social environment.

      Never underestimate how much destruction 10 crazies with guns, motorbikes and alcohol can bring to any society.

    118. Re:Global Warning by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      No, actually, I didn't see what happened during/after Katrina. I saw what the media SAID happened during/after Katrina. It turns out that most of it didn't happen.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    119. Re:Global Warning by Raenex · · Score: 1

      The 15% number bandied about appears to be based on Marshall, and if you Google around there is plenty of debate besides "one nut on snopes". An example is New Evidence Regarding Fire Ratios.

    120. Re:Global Warning by azakem · · Score: 1

      because that's what it looked like on TV.

      Well, there's your problem right there.

      Also, your racism is a bit above the level of subtle.

    121. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Training (conditioning) has gotten much more effective in the intervening decades.

    122. Re:Global Warning by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      just instituting #3 would have saved hundreds of lives and the suffering of thousands during Katrina.

      Instituting #8 would most likely ensure that you won't be dictator for long. Geez Louise.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    123. Re:Global Warning by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, and what of all those undocumented migrant workers?

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    124. Re:Global Warning by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      It's more likely to cause global cooling, as TFS and TFA state.

      Actually a massive super volcano eruption would initially cause global cooling from the ash and the sulfuric oxide released would form in droplets in the upper atmosphere blocking the sun causing the volcanic winter effect for a couple of years or longer. Eventually the sulfuric oxide would come back to earth (in the form of a rain of sulfuric acid). Then global warming would kick into overdrive from all the greenhouse gasses that was released as well as the methane from the rotting corpses as the ground as it thaws and eventually when the ocean kicks up a few more degrees higher than it is now, all the methane hydrates on the ocean floor will release, causing even more warming.

      Hope you have your winter parkas and your SPS500 sunblock. You will need both in a couple of years.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    125. Re:Global Warning by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      And the starving. There's always the starving.

      There's always Soylent Green.

    126. Re:Global Warning by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      This has more gross violations of the constitution than a German porn video.

      Besides. I believe in Darwinism. If you aren't strong enough to make it out alive, then you deserve to die. The human race has been in evolutionary stagnation for millennia. Time to thin the herd a bit, anyways.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    127. Re:Global Warning by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      (heck, the longest known magma/lava flow in the solar system is only ~160 miles, and that is on Jupiter's moon, Io)

      BZZZZT. Im sorry, thank you for playing. The largest know magma flow would be the the Siberian Basalt Traps. A eruption that lasted for 500,000 years and covered up to 7 million square kilometers.

      As far as no direct evidence for Mt Toba, you are incorrect. The evidence lies in not only the geographic record, but in our DNA as well as the DNA of lice and bacteria.

      So maybe you should bother doing some research. I suggest maybe a course in basic geology at your local community college. At least you will be caught up with the average slashdot reader.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    128. Re:Global Warning by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Market share, in strategic management and marketing, is the percentage or proportion of the total available market or market segment that is being serviced by a company.

      -Wikipedia

      If the size of the market is halved aribtrarily, than everyone's market share remains the same. However, if there is a bias (e.g. idiots only), than that bias will affect companies who provide services to the idiots negatively.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    129. Re:Global Warning by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      Once again, someone completely fooled by the political 'Green' movement.

      GLOBAL WARMING is NOT mam-made. It is a natural process. Hell, the volcano's in Hawaii produce more GHG than the US does each year.

      Also, regardless of what Al Gore tells you, there the only consensus about climate change is that climate changes.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    130. Re:Global Warning by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Um... like, "like" always comes before "all". So like, it's "but then it would like, all cool down. Like food does when it's like heated. OMG! Maybe it could like, cool too much? Then what if I'm like not hot anymore? That would be like a total bummer!

      Like, leave the valley girl talk to the valley girls, k? Cause like, you totally suck at it...

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    131. Re:Global Warning by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Despite the bunging of Katrina's aftermath, what I saw in *advance* of Katrina was quite useful. The Mayor BEGGED people to leave town on local television. Everybody had several days' warning, they just chose not to leave.

      Please explain where you think all those people could have gone TO. Remember, we're not talking about regular, middle-class people with some money in the bank for a rainy day (although that's probably too much to expect of middle-class Americans these days, in this debt society). New Orleans was full of dirt-poor people with NO money at all, and no place to go (all their friends and relatives lived in the 9th Ward with them). Many/most of these people don't have cars, and they certainly don't have money for a Greyhound bus, and most definitely don't have money to spend a month in a hotel room somewhere.

      What you're proposing is like going to Somalia and begging people there to leave because of an impending natural disaster. If you don't provide people that impoverished with a way to leave, then your "begging" is just plain insulting.

      If you want to point some fingers, I'd point to the mayor, who had a fleet of school buses at his disposal, but instead of using those to move people out of the city, they just sat there and were flooded.

      When you're dealing with a population that poor, and that uneducated, without any resources at all, you can't just tell them a disaster is coming and expect them to figure out how to deal with it on their own. They simply don't have the capability or the money. The government should have organized transport and refugee centers for these people to go to, and security so they didn't rape each other in the shelters. Any public official who couldn't anticipate that should be barred from office due to stupidity.

    132. Re:Global Warning by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Having followed the science for at least 25yrs I don't need the Greens or Al Gore to tell me you have been brainwashed into supporting an anti-science agenda.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    133. Re:Global Warning by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Given the US's excellent record of containing human suffering due to natural, forseeable disaster in New Orleans the other year, I'm sure you have nothing to worry about.

    134. Re:Global Warning by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      ...Bravo! And to this, I add: we did such a "Heck of a job, Browny" over New Orleans's flooding that we can rest assured FEMA would help us all out in a jiffy.

    135. Re:Global Warning by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      It seemed crazy to me that in the New Orleans situation, it was expected of everyone to get out under their own steam by private car or regular transport.

      Wait, the US has public transportation?

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but there are about 400,000 people living in nawleans. The average capacity for a bus is about 60 folks (guestimate based on experience with greyhound). 5000 buses. I couldn't find accurate figures for average train capacity. I'm making a wild estimate at 400, being 40 passengers per car on a 10 car train. And that's if there are trains available. Simply being able to get that many trains into new orleans, and out at a reasonable time is kind of unthinkable. I don't know much about NO, but I can bet that their train station(s) are not as large nor as organized as, say, Pennsylvania Station in Manhattan. Being able to bus/train the entire population out of New Orleans, given the state of our public/mass transportation (horrible) is kind of ludicrous. They MIGHT be able to load one train every half hour. And that's if amtrak could get that many trains there within a reasonable amount of time. School buses could be used for evac. There are tons of things that could have been done.

      But basing evacuation quality on the quality of our bus/train service, adding in the hysteria, adding in the scams (never underestimate the kind of things people will pull on each other when times are desperate), adding in the crime rate in new orleans, so on and so forth... I'm actually surprised it was handled as well (as bad as it may have been) as it was. It could have been a whole lot worse. There could have been more mistakes made. Given the quality of our governance, the quality of our infrastructure, it could have been a hell of a lot worse.

    136. Re:Global Warning by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      College campuses also have a (comparatively) large population of people *cough* enthusiastic about hydroponic systems and grow lights.

    137. Re:Global Warning by zobier · · Score: 1

      Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Should Be A Convenience Store not a Government Agency

      Can't remember who said it.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    138. Re:Global Warning by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I agree. In fact I would go so far as to say that in general active volcanos stink and produce more "pollution" than the people living on their flanks. I also think that long before we were human we evolved a survival mechanisim that perceives the stink as a warning to stay away, when we learned to write that mechanisim became the Bible's "fire and brimstone". Many tribal religions that actually live on volcanos are more sophisticated than that, they recognise that the volcano can also bring new life in the form of rain and fertilzer. The mistake that all these tribes make is that they think they can appeal to the volcano's "good side", nature doesn't have a "good side" and doesn't care one bit if she covers you and your tribe with molten rock.

      /rant

      The tribal view is also applicable to the industrial revolution. Factories provide us with a lifestyle that few of us are willing/able to give up, but it's clear those factories are killing environmental canaries at an alarming rate.

      I witnessed Mao's famine on a B&W TV as a child and that's what would happen if we stopped the industrial revolution, but I also recognise we are now so numerous that to continue with bussiness as usual means a global Easter Island is a real risk for my grandkids (first one due in March). It's not that we don't have the technology to have our environmental cake and eat it, it's that (until recently) most of our "chiefs" have been busy fighting each other over the right to kiss the factory god's arse. The world's witch doctors who collectively create our technology are ignored when they point out fatal but potentialy fixable bugs such as the tradjedy of the commons. Like the tribal witch-doctors appealing to the "good side" of the volcano god's I fear that our witch-doctors are appealing to the "good side" of human nature.

      There are now over twice as many people on the planet than when I was born, I was a moderate greenie before the term "greenie" was invented. I watched the rural town where I grew up swallowed by the city of Melbourne. I have been visiting the local beach where I now live for 45yrs, over that time it went from clean to filthy and back to clean again, in fact the entire bay did likewise (Port Phillip Bay) and the fishing is slowly returning to what it used to be in the 60's (recreational fishing licenses were introduced to buy back commercial scallop boat licences). The strip of wetlands on the other side of where I live is a paradise for birds and a breeding ground for fish. It's still a shit farm but not like the original one that ruined the beach in the 70's, this one produces "drinkable" water and fertlizer for nearby turf farms. OTOH like a more intense version of California, much of the land that supported Melboune's growth is dead, dying, in drought, or in flames.

      Technological supremacy is what seperates us from other animals, if we don't use it to our long term advantage we are just like any other predatorless mammal and will soon eat and shit ourselves into a population crash that according to the witch doctors will also drag much of the planets biosphere down with it. Currently middle eastern goat hearders are best equiped to deal with the aftermath of the witch-doctors visions.

      /rant

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    139. Re:Global Warning by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Well, if "only" 1% of the population were deciding to kill people, that would still be an unstable society.

      I'm not sure WW2 Britain is a useful example; despite a reduced availability of food, there was still a strong Government, and law and order maintained.

    140. Re:Global Warning by tbannist · · Score: 1

      I find it telling that you seem to be more concerned with what he was required to do than with what he could have done and what he did do.

      Not being "required" to do something doesn't get you off the hook for not doing it.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    141. Re:Global Warning by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Which we are going to sell at premium prices, or at least we should, odds are the US will just to invade us regardless, you know, bringing democracy to our *republic* and all...

        No wait!, Obama is president now, gah! its really game-changing (Queen's English be damned).

        Part of me wishes Obama is found evil so I don't have to change my political prejudices. The rest of me are busy gagging, tying and throwing into river the aforementioned part.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    142. Re:Global Warning by wpiman · · Score: 1
      Sorry to ruin everyone's doomsday fun. ;)

      Well, I guess we will have to resort back to the fear of CO2 emissions causing the planet to turn into an oven and the oceans melting and drowning us all. Certainly not as cataclysmic as a one time explosion.

    143. Re:Global Warning by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the jet stream will force that eastward across the USA (and around the world, in the event of a major eruption).

      Sweet. I'm in western Washington, so I'll be the last one to get that ash. Anyone who wants to be safe just needs to move slightly west of the volcano.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    144. Re:Global Warning by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the laugh :)

      Not that I disagree (state and local government was a big problem in NOLA), but the idea that someone on Slashdot is bashing Bush for not maknig a power grab when he had the chance is pretty freaking hilarious.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    145. Re:Global Warning by Sinning · · Score: 1

      It will be "justice". The deaths of millions of innocents for no good reason. Just like the socialists of the 20th century did.

      Socialists like G. W. Bush?

    146. Re:Global Warning by Kyont · · Score: 1

      (feints)

      So... she's fencing at the same time?

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    147. Re:Global Warning by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I'm a strong supporter of state's rights too, but that time what was really needed was just the opposite.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    148. Re:Global Warning by Kyont · · Score: 1

      I have a good friend in Montana, but if warnings were as good as Katrina's, I'd be just fine. As a Californian, if I see Arnie telling NorCal folks to bail, I'm gone in 60 seconds...

      Good plan! Go for it! *Chuckles at fact that, unlike California, Montana borders Yellowstone*

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    149. Re:Global Warning by bentcd · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, human rice, the perfect food to get you through post-apocalyptic cannibalistic times.

      Human rice is PEOPLE!

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    150. Re:Global Warning by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      So you say the news team
      - faked the whole scene
      - specifically selected footage fitting their agenda
      - manipulated footage to fit their agenda
      - specifically selected this location and event to film over other, more racially diverse acts of looting

      Well, you have an inkling of proof, do you?

      Assume all carjackings in your city are done by people with their hair dyed red. EVERY SINGLE INCIDENT. Would you call a statistic or a video report on this fact racist or realistic?

      It's only slander if it's untrue, you know.

    151. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh snowgirl, the rampant feminist troll. Can't wait for you to get raped again!

    152. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire western US couldn't be evacuated. Where would people in Denver, Las Vegas, Omaha, Kansas City, Phoenix, and even Los Angeles go if this was a mega eruption? You couldn't just sit at home an watch it "snow" ash since 1 inch of ash is equal to 6 inches of heavy, wet snow. Most roofs would collapse under just a few inches of ash. The highway system would be plugged up with people trying to evacuate and then nobody could leave. And scientist, with all their technology, admit they have no idea what's going on underground at Yellowstone. It could blow today or 100,000 years from now. They just don't know. Sorry, but it's not that easy of a solution. I wish it were that simple.

    153. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is very true, but the main bulk of the damage, maybe not to human life, but at least to ecology and human settlements, will come from the mud-slide like rivers of ash that will form at the first rain storm. Could clog rivers and wipe out towns. I shudder to think what would happen if such a slide slammed into Hoover Dam, although I'm not sure the Colorado River is within the ash-falling danger area.

    154. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. He was saying that the fact that he has a friend in Montana makes the idea of this eruption terrible to him. He also further says that, since he lives in California, he will have a chance to evacuate in time. The whole har har, he sed hez gunna evacuate to his friend's place in Montana, cuz he thinks that Montana is always gunna be safe, cuz that's the cliche with nuclear war "gotcha" you think you found is just not there. *Chuckles at fact that, unlike you, I can correctly comprehend what I read*

    155. Re:Global Warning by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      > Bring animals. Layers. Breeding stock. Shelter them. Protect them.

      Lawyers is spelled with a w

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    156. Re:Global Warning by DadsGirl23 · · Score: 1

      Global Warming is a bunch of %^#@. Where I live I MIGHT get 1/2 inch of snow in the winter. Between last winter and this winter, we've got over 4 FEET with temperatures staying in the single digits or below for over a month! People SO need to get over it already.

    157. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then, to top it all off, you spelled "choked" incorrectly.

    158. Re:Global Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, someone completely fooled by the political 'Green' movement.

      GLOBAL WARMING is NOT mam-made. It is a natural process. Hell, the volcano's in Hawaii produce more GHG than the US does each year.

      Also, regardless of what Al Gore tells you, there the only consensus about climate change is that climate changes.

      I believe you because you SHOUTED! That's always more convincing!

      No, wait, you're a fuckwit. The only "fact" in your post (or should that be FACT?) is complete shit. Here:

      "Volcanic eruptions can enhance global warming by adding CO2 to the atmosphere. However, a far greater amount of CO2 is contributed to the atmosphere by human activities each year than by volcanic eruptions. T.M.Gerlach (1991, American Geophysical Union) notes that human-made CO2 are dwarfed the estamated global release of CO2 from volcanoes by at least 150 times. The small amount of global warming caused by eruption-generated greenhouse gases is offset by the far greater amount of global cooling caused by eruption-generated particles in the stratosphere (the haze effect). Greenhouse warming of the earth has been particularly evident since 1980. Without the cooling influence of such eruptions as El Chichon (1982) and Mt. Pinatubo (1991), described below, greenhouse warming would have been more pronounced."

      Though I suspect you don't even have the brain power to read the above.

    159. Re:Global Warning by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      Aw come on, when Yellowstone blows, we're all gonna have a BLAST!

      --
      ...
  16. watch and wait by purpleraison · · Score: 1

    Ultimately, there is nothing we can do but warn people. ...and wait....

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
    1. Re:watch and wait by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      ..and check out real estate prices on the East Coast, Canada, or South America (and learn Spanish, French or Portuguese)

    2. Re:watch and wait by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, there is nothing we can do but warn people. ...and wait....

      They won't listen.

      Sad statement, but backed up by considerable experimental evidence.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  17. Happy New Year!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey wait...

    1. Re:Happy New Year!! by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Happy new year to you too. *grin*

      (posted safely far away from the Netherlands at 01:07)

      --
      home
  18. Heres hoping.. by dutchct · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ..it's releasing more energy then its storing. The fact that the park is so geothermally active may be a good thing. It's much better for us if its releasing it's energy slowly rather then all at once. Sort of like a pressure relief valve on a hot water heater.

  19. Recent Earthquake map by KORfan · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Recent Earthquake map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Pah, that's nothing. Super eruption my ass. That map should be lit up with hundreds and hundreds of earthquakes around the whole caldera. It's nothing but a small and localized burp.

      Wake me up when the earthquake swarm is over the whole area and there is evidence of updoming from clinometers and DGPS monitors.

    2. Re:Recent Earthquake map by inKubus · · Score: 1

      The caldera has been rising at an increased rate for several years, as I submitted to Slashdot back in Nov. 2007 (and was rejected ;)

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    3. Re:Recent Earthquake map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah, that's nothing. Super eruption my ass.

      I see I'm not alone. Apparently there are other Fartistes who have their share of bad gas every morning.

    4. Re:Recent Earthquake map by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Gotta love that site: "Click on an earthquake for more information".

      Just how do you click on an *earthquake*? Put your mouse on the ground and wait for the earth to start shaking?

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    5. Re:Recent Earthquake map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well theres been nothin for over 12 hours. This hasn't been the case since Dec 27th.
      Shows over folks. Or is it...?

  20. "would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental US" by DanWS6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many Library of Congresses is that?

  21. Pressure applied by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of the top of my head, I remember that the Air Force got caught pumping waste chemical weapons into the subsurface under Rock Flats

    Hey, here's a thought - PUMPING STUFF UNDERGROUND increases pressure.

    PUMPING STUFF OUT OF THE GROUND reduces pressure.

    Given that magma wells are many miles below the surface, tapping a bit of oil that sits relatively near the top is doing nothing for a massive supervolcano.

    So basically the top of your head is an idiot, hopefully it's not spread any further than that.

    Couple that with George Bush's legislation

    Too late! He thinks George Bush is congress now!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Pressure applied by Aetuneo · · Score: 1

      Pumping waste chemical weapons into the subsurface under Rock Flats = Pumping stuff underground = Increases pressure.

      Kindly read what you are insulting before insulting it, it leaves innocent bystanders like me with less of a headache. Or, if you still argue that it's not the same thing, use an argument which makes sense with the thing you're insulting, okay?

      --
      Everything is subjective.
    2. Re:Pressure applied by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      Hey, here's a thought - PUMPING STUFF UNDERGROUND increases pressure.

      Ever had a hydrology course? It's obvious you haven't. If you had bothered to read the link I posted about the mud volcano, just the act of drilling causing the hydrology to change & the sudden decrease in pressure causes the volcanism. How about next time you take such a snarky tone, you remove your head from your ass first?

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
  22. Somebody call Crono! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to stop Lavos from destroying the world! Though I think that happened in 1999.

    1. Re:Somebody call Crono! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We need to stop Lavos from destroying the world!

      Some things are fixed, some things are in a flux. Yellowstone is a fixed point in history. What happens, happens. There's no stopping it.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Somebody call Crono! by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yellowstone is a fixed point in history. What happens, happens. There's no stopping it.

      That's just the sort of "bend over and take it up the arse" that has gotten you Americans into the mess you're in right now. You should be out protesting in the streets about this impending supervolcano! If you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem. Won't someone _please_ think of the children? Maybe next time you'll vote in a government with a firm policy platform on the whole supervolcano issue. If this supervolcano goes off then the terrorists win.

      I've got plenty more!

    3. Re:Somebody call Crono! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That was a Doctor Who reference you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Somebody call Crono! by BearRanger · · Score: 4, Funny

      And all this time I thought that if you weren't part of the solution you were part of the precipitate...

    5. Re:Somebody call Crono! by jamesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's even funnier is that my post is moderated 'Insightful'. Pay attention moderators!!! There was nothing 'Insightful' in my post - it was one of those things you do in the morning when you haven't had your caffeinated energy drink yet.

    6. Re:Somebody call Crono! by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's just the sort of "bend over and take it up the arse" that has gotten you Americans into the mess you're in right now.

      I'm pretty sure you're talking about French attitudes there.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    7. Re:Somebody call Crono! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am part of the problem.

      When the time comes I'll save the children, but not the British children. Where my Yellowstone bears at?

    8. Re:Somebody call Crono! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please tell me why this was modded Insightful.

    9. Re:Somebody call Crono! by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 1

      First thing I'd do is get a heck of a lot of caffeine tablets, gasoline, and valuable goods (not as in electronics or jewels, but as in useful-in-a-post-apocalyptic-world items), and drive for a week straight south, as far as I can get in South America. If this thing blows, you can forget right away about transcontinental flights.

    10. Re:Somebody call Crono! by the_womble · · Score: 1

      The British government would probably want to place everyone under surveillance to catch volcano sympathisers and criminalise the possession of material about volcanoes.

    11. Re:Somebody call Crono! by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Does this mean one random family of assholes gets to survive and tell the rest of the world?

    12. Re:Somebody call Crono! by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    13. Re:Somebody call Crono! by mccoma · · Score: 1

      one man's trolling is another man's insight

    14. Re:Somebody call Crono! by mccoma · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a great feature if you could ask the moderator wtf? Even if it was anonymous, it would be a great insight into how some of this stuff happens. Then again, it might just be like starring into the abyss Cthulhu-style.

    15. Re:Somebody call Crono! by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      It's because a funny moderation doesn't grant you karma but insightful does. Some moderator must have felt kind enough to through you a bone because he or she felt it was funny and true.

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  23. In other news ... by Sepiraph · · Score: 1

    Happy new year! * Put on tin-foil party hat * (And I guess it's time to plan to move ...)

  24. No boom today. by Werkhaus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

    1. Re:No boom today. by chill · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!"

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:No boom today. by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

      Boom Another Day.

    3. Re:No boom today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boom Chaka-Laka, Boom Chaka-Laka, Boom Chaka-Laka, Boom!

    4. Re:No boom today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh I love Ivannova's humour ;)
      B5 rocks.

  25. Sensationalism at its best by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The linked articles do not really raise any cause for concern. The title sure has a ZOMG!!! factor to it, but in reality it's just a bunch of what-ifs. Move along, nothing to see here.

    --
    blah blah blah
    1. Re:Sensationalism at its best by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh come on, this is Slashdotland. Every day a new cure for cancer/AIDS is found, along with a new storage tech that stores things at an atomic level. Every week Microsoft stares bankruptcy in the face because Linux is taking over. When Rockstar Games don't have a "controversial" new release out, the editors have to balance the good news with a few downers.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:Sensationalism at its best by symbolset · · Score: 1

      This also does not raise any cause for concern. But there was cause for concern. There really really was.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  26. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, either that or I'm the type of gambler who believes that bad luck draws more bad luck.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  27. GW linked to volcanic activity ?! WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Climate change may actually increase the probability of volcanic and earthquake activity!

    See article below:

    "The Earth fights back ..
    Never mind higher temperatures, climate change has a few nastier surprises in store. Bill McGuire says we can also expect more earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides and tsunamis"

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/aug/07/disasters/

    1. Re:GW linked to volcanic activity ?! WTF by slashnik · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Climate change may actually increase the probability of volcanic and earthquake activity!"

      Come on get off the fence, does it or doesn't it.

    2. Re:GW linked to volcanic activity ?! WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Climate change may actually increase the probability of volcanic and earthquake activity!

      See article below:

      "The Earth fights back ..
      Never mind higher temperatures, climate change has a few nastier surprises in store. Bill McGuire says we can also expect more earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides and tsunamis"

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/aug/07/disasters/

      The scientific argument seems to be that the sea level rise due to climate change can actually trigger increase in volcanic activity. Hmmm....

    3. Re:GW linked to volcanic activity ?! WTF by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      Depends on the degree of ice-loss.

      Google "isostatic rebound"

  28. Too late by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously Slashdot, you need to work on your reaction time. This was news two days ago.

    These earthquake swarms happen frequently in Yellowstone, and this one has already ended. Yellowstone has dropped back to its ordinary low rumble.

    --
    But then again, I could be wrong.
    1. Re:Too late by Catalina588 · · Score: 1

      I saw a TV show on this subject in 2007. It's old news. But Yellowstone will indeedblow the plug off the caldera one of these days and pretty much wipe out human civilization as we know it. Happy New Year.

    2. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. User base is going downhill without active participants. It's kind of nice to watch. Enjoy the joys of economic downturn. It won't last long though. 6 more months and we'll see the active participants return in droves.

    3. Re:Too late by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that the area that these earthquakes are occuring contimues to rise and tilt the lake south

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Too late by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Obama is doing a good job.

    5. Re:Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't expand the entire list there, buddy.

      http://www.seis.utah.edu/req2webdir/recenteqs/Maps/Yellowstone_full.html

    6. Re:Too late by Powercube · · Score: 1

      I'd also like to add that there have been swarms of up to 1000 quakes near or within the caldera since measuring began in 1923. A particularly big year for swarms was 1985. I note that we are still here.

    7. Re:Too late by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that the area that these earthquakes are occuring contimues to rise and tilt the lake south

      Of course it's still building up to an eruption. I'm saying that every little earthquake swarm cannot be taken as a sign of imminent eruption.

      Look for reports of venting gas, or even minor lava eruptions around the edges. Then run.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    8. Re:Too late by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Somebody has not explained geologic timescale to you.

      Events are material. Frequency of events are material. But whether the events occurred three days or a hundred years ago is not. Mother Earth has a different pace than Reuters.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Too late by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      You didn't expand the entire list there, buddy.

      http://www.seis.utah.edu/req2webdir/recenteqs/Maps/Yellowstone_full.html

      A background rumble of magnitude 1-2 quakes is a constant feature of Yellowstone. It is not a sign of imminent eruption.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    10. Re:Too late by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      Somebody has not explained relevant arguments to you.

      The geologic timescale is irrelevant as the context here is implicitly the human timescale. This earthquake swarm does not indicate an eruption in the lifetime of any person now living.

      (the bad news being that it doesn't indicate that it won't erupt either)

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    11. Re:Too late by Janeshat · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? It is not over. From looking at the map you linked to it is still rumbling today and at a greater magnitude.
      I am just glad I live in ohio and will not get the hot ash or lava in my living room. I will just get the nuclear winter and the cold ash that can form cement in my lungs and kill off all the plantlife! :)

      It might be a good idea to transplant some of the animals we have herded into yelowstone over the last 100 years to another location upwind though just in case. Dead people that have a choice are one thing, but dead animals we herded into a giant volcano is another.

  29. silver lining by ignavus · · Score: 1

    plunge global temperatures

    Well, that would fix global warming.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
    1. Re:silver lining by zullnero · · Score: 1

      But it wouldn't work worth a crap in regard to drastic climate change. So, not really that much of a silver lining, unless you can't handle warm temperatures so much.

      Boy, the winters would SUCK then. I guess it's cool, if you LIKE that.

  30. Somebody at US News & World Report Blogged abo by Fished · · Score: 1

    Somebody from US News & World report blogged about it here. Not quite to the "run in circles scream and shout" stage, but I might go and spend $100 on rice and beans, just in case.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  31. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 4, Funny

    History books will refer to late 2008 as The Year God Decided He Really Hated America.

    (This is only true if the volcano blows within the next 5 hours, and I have to say - if it's going to blow, it should do it then, just for the humor value.)

    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  32. Good thing I have been using the simulator... by Daswolfen · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a apocalypse right around the corner, its a good thing that I am spending many hours in the perfect post-apocalyptic simulation, Fallout 3.

    Super Volcano or Nuclear War, the net effect is the same, just one has less radiation.

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  33. Nothingofvaluewaslost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's ok. It'd take out red states much more than blue ones.

  34. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, either that or I'm the type of gambler who believes that bad luck draws more bad luck.

    When probability talks about independent events, it fails to take into account anecdotal superstition.

  35. 2012 by rlp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, won't happen till Mayan doomsday. Enjoy your New Year. (Though at least we won't have to fix the 2038 bug).

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since Roland Emmerich is such an expert on low temperatures effect on humans*, we should all bow to this unrivalled master of truth. 2012 it is, then.

      * Under -100 (-110) decrees Celcius is routinely used as a relief for people suffering variety of pains in several bathing facilities among others.

  36. Your link doesn't seem to support your contention by Fished · · Score: 1

    I see 3 3.0+ quakes today after a couple of days off. From what I've been reading, it seems like quakes greater than 3 are somewhat unusual period. Granted, I know squat about geology, but it still seems a bit anomalous. (Unfortunately, the U. Utah page doesn't seem to go back more than a few days, so I can't really tell for sure how unusual 3.0 quakes are. I'd welcome being corrected with real data.)

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  37. At times like these by chaossplintered · · Score: 5, Funny

    At times like these, I feel it's appropriate to start rocking back and forth singing:

    Life's a piece of shit
    When you look at it
    Life's a laugh and death's a joke, it's true.
    You'll see it's all a show
    Keep 'em laughing as you go
    Just remember that the last laugh is on you.

    And always look on the bright side of life...
    Always look on the right side of life...

    1. Re:At times like these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAMMIT!

      Now I have that song stuck in my head... thankyou very much. :(

      Oh, and Happy New Year! Unless it actually does erupt... cause that would pretty much ruin the year for quite a lot of people...

      *walks away humming*

    2. Re:At times like these by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      Not the year, but more than likely it would probably ruin my day, at least.

      --
      - Dan
  38. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    History books will refer to late 2008 as The Year God Decided He Really Hated America.

    Nah, the fundamentalists will just blame Gay Marriage.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  39. Maybe this Was a Bad Time... by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

    To Move from Santa Ana, CA to near Denver, CO (I.E. about 1000 miles closer to Yellowstone then before). Oh well been nice knowing you all...either that or is it time for that Mexican vacation yet?

    --
    ...in bed
  40. Crops wiped out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, a significant percentage of one year's crops would be wiped out if it happens during the growing season. If it happens now, during winter, it would be quite a task for each farmer to scrape off all the ash -- and how much has to be removed depends upon how much ash can be plowed into the earth without affecting a crop plant (I'm being ambiguous because if a single crop is known to grow in such land then it would get planted rather than usual crop selections).

  41. Slashdot crowd by IF_I_was_G*d · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's kind of interesting, how the Slashdot crowd has really nothing meaningful to comment on this possible and according to some scientists "overdue" event.

    1. Re:Slashdot crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Slashdot crowd by Shag · · Score: 1

      Because you were expecting.... what, exactly? Suggestions? Good ideas?

      The standard operating procedure for dealing with a supervolcano is get the $#!+ outta there.

      You can't exactly stop it.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    3. Re:Slashdot crowd by mjensen · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      When it does blow, there will be debris in Florida.
      Hm...You'd think they'd close the park first hm???

      The supervolcano has been on History Channel for 10 years or so.

    4. Re:Slashdot crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you expect? At this point, the fear the country has experienced from what our leaders say about terrists, global climate change, the economy, the housing crisis and the ensuing bailouts, the car maker bailouts, Obama taking the presidency (all the Repubs I've talked to are scared shitless, heh), nuclear holocaust and an ensuing nuclear winter, Microsoft, Apple, hackerz, crackerz, backerz, farmerz, phisherz, warez, viruses (or virii for you egotistical pedants), the Year of the Linux Desktop, zombies, My Bloody Valentine 3D (and 2D) and other equally scary/stupid movies, god/s (or a lack of god/s), The Day the Earth Stood Still, Keanu Reaves' deadpan, women, Madonna, Michael Jackson, lawyers, pedophiles, child molesters, MySpace, Facebook, all my important parsonel (intentionally misspelled) dataz, doing anything e-legal and illegal (grammar joke), pirates, the RIAA and MPAA, ninjas, guns, erosion of personal rights, radon, homosexuals, bitches, bimbos, the intardnet, and a really scary (but funny) rabbit, what else do you think we can handle?

      Here you go:
      AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! RUN AWAY!

    5. Re:Slashdot crowd by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      It's kind of interesting, how the Slashdot crowd has really nothing meaningful to comment on this

      I see you're doing your part...oh, sorry, I almost missed that absurdly alarmist unreferenced implication that it's "overdue"... Southern California has been (according to some scientists) "overdue" for "The Big One" since before I was born. The bottom line is that the geological sciences (esp. seismology, vulcanology) are notoriously inept at accurate useful-time-frame predictions. They may be kinda consistent/accurate when it comes to a couple minutes/hours before an event, but our understanding is too incomplete for anything consistent beyond that.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    6. Re:Slashdot crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're still trying to figure out how to blame it on Microsoft...

    7. Re:Slashdot crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is, and has always been, a really miserable and useless place to try to discuss anything related to the geosciences. Almost no one here knows anything about the subject, which it seems does little to deter some from posting their uninformed speculation as fact.

    8. Re:Slashdot crowd by Shag · · Score: 1

      Discovery, and 4-5 years, if it's the program I'm thinking of. They pre-screened it for the geology majors here, since our campus is on a volcano.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    9. Re:Slashdot crowd by turing_m · · Score: 1

      The bottom line is that the geological sciences (esp. seismology, vulcanology) are notoriously inept at accurate useful-time-frame predictions. They may be kinda consistent/accurate when it comes to a couple minutes/hours before an event, but our understanding is too incomplete for anything consistent beyond that.

      More than ineptness, it may be practically impossible to model to or get useful inputs for such a model (when there will be a surge in magma convection or a shearing in rock). It's like a lot of unstable situations - you need a trigger but can't predict when that trigger will come. Often that trigger is a result of random noise or something too small to track. Houses of cards at a certain height, economic bubble burstings, soap bubble burstings, supercooled water freezing, disgruntled postal workers snapping... you can't predict except within a certain time frame when any of these are going to occur. It's more a result of lacking omniscience than being inept or not understanding the phenomena.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    10. Re:Slashdot crowd by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Slashdot crowd (Score:3, Interesting)

      It's kind of interesting, how the Slashdot crowd has really nothing meaningful to comment on this possible and according to some scientists "overdue" event.

      I love sarcastic moderation.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:Slashdot crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Slashdot (and Digg) usually remind me of Terry Pratchett's definition of "Vox Pop".

      "People who don't know anything telling other people what they know."

    12. Re:Slashdot crowd by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's kind of interesting, how the Slashdot crowd has really nothing meaningful to comment on this possible and according to some scientists "overdue" event.

      Well, what can we say, really? "2009 will not be the Year of Linux on the desktop"? Duh. ~

    13. Re:Slashdot crowd by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The bottom line is that the geological sciences (esp. seismology, vulcanology) are notoriously inept at accurate useful-time-frame predictions.

      The geological sciences make perfectly good predictions. It's just that you bloody humans have too short a lifetime hang around for a reasonable period of time and get a decent statistical sample.

      Get your lifetime out to a millennium or so and you'll see a lot more regularity to earthquakes etc, in the same way that most people see regular patterns in the weather each year and even over several-year-long periods.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  42. GW linked to volcanic activity ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard to believe, but the article below makes a scientifically plausible case for a link between global warming and increased earthquake and volcanic activity!

    "The Earth fights back"
    "Never mind higher temperatures, climate change has a few nastier surprises in store. Bill McGuire says we can also expect more earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides and tsunamis"
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/aug/07/disasters/

  43. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    One

  44. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by bornyesterday · · Score: 1

    Considering the LoC is just about as far to the east of Yellowstone as you can get in the continental US, and if we're lucky about ash and fallout patterns, hopefully it would be none. In fact, if I hear that it has erupted, I will make maximum haste to reach the LoC to potentially increase my chances of survival.

  45. Maybe it just has to pee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Given the expected result of an eruption, that would be 1.0 or so Libraries of Congress. ;)

  47. About payment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you underestimate how ugly I am.

  48. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Unix+Ronin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, this is true, but what you have to remember is that those "mathematical models" were created by imbeciles who believed that all events in the financial market were independent (i.e no event in the market affects any other event), that the market can grow forever without limit, and -- worse -- still believe that when an event that the models say is a once-in-a-hundred-years event happens three times in six months, it's not an indication of a basic flaw in the model, but rather a rare fluke that means it's now statistically certain it'll NEVER happen again. The global financial sector's "mathematical models" are worthless, and always have been. They built a house of cards using imaginary money as cards, and the question was only one of when the house of cards would collapse.

    The financial market and the Yellowstone basin are hardly related. Our models of vulcanism are incompletely understood, and based on what is -- on a geological scale -- a very short period of observation, a mere century and a half or so in the case of Yellowstone. But they are at least based on observation and study, not wishful thinking. Yes, many of the models indicate that there could be another supervolcanic event at Yellowstone "any time now". But on a geological timescale, that "any time now" could be a thousand years away.

    This is interesting news, and absolutely bears close monitoring, but I think it's a little premature to run around shouting that the sky is falling. But regardless of the actual risk from Yellowstone, I don't think that the failure of the consensual delusion passed off as mathematical models of the global economy constitutes anything that can be used as evidence for anything except for how stupid a whole lot of ostensibly really smart people can actually be, when they're blinded by greed.

  49. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by NikLinna · · Score: 1
  50. Call someone, quick! by blake182 · · Score: 1

    Shit, I can't remember -- is this a job for Pierce Brosnan or for Tommy Lee Jones?

    1. Re:Call someone, quick! by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Depends. Which is the one that got everyone caught in a rowboat off a lakehouse surrounded by lava?

    2. Re:Call someone, quick! by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      Pierce Brosnan.

      An eruption at Yellowstone would more than likely be an explosive type due to the denser rock strata causing a major pyroclastic flow.

      No lava flow for Tommy Lee Jones to drop a building on to divert into a concrete riverbed.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
    3. Re:Call someone, quick! by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      No it's a job for Michael Riley in Supervolcano. Possibly my favourite disaster movie because it is told as a documentary and dramatisation by the survivors of the event and amazingly the science is good.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    4. Re:Call someone, quick! by crazybit · · Score: 1

      Considering the level of the potential catastrophe, rated by some people here as a total armageddon for the human race, I think our only hope is Chuck Norris.

      --
      - Human knowledge belongs to the world
  51. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by eadon-com · · Score: 1

    Human behaviour is connected due to active observers. Natural behaviour is less so. This is a question of criticality. If you pour sand, then a pile forms that creates "avalanches" in an exponentially unpredictable fashion. Small avalanches occur more than large ones. both seem to be inherently random in their timing.

  52. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by praedictus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I noticed that too, and the local distribution of the cluster does look somewhat like pre-volcanic activity. But if it were the supervolcano. I'd expect activity along the caldera margins. This looks more like something that would result in a new cone or maybe just some new hot springs under the lake.

    --
    Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
  53. lets face it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the planet earth was not that great in the first place. billions of people dont have clean drinking water, while people who could afford to let them work for it, instead spend money on drugs and trinkets.

    i feel bad for the innocent people, but the ones who will mostly be fucked by this are the world powers... and it really wouldnt be such a horrible thing if they were all wiped out. for the people living on 2 dollars a day in some place that is filled with landmines from the 'civilized' world, starving to death in the midst of chaos and disease would be nothing new to them... in fact, they are the most likely to survive, perhaps feasting on the bloated, fatty corpses of americans who dont know that bread is made of wheat or which direction the sun comes up.

  54. Great articles linked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One says the last eruption was 640,000 years ago, the other says 70,000.

    1. Re:Great articles linked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because they're talking about 2 different places. 640k years ago was the last Yellowstone supervolcano eruption. 70k years ago, the Toba supervolcano erupted, which was the last (read: most recent) supervolcano eruption on the planet.

  55. Dangerous assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The argument always seems to be how wildly unlikely it'll happen. The problem is we are due for an eruption and what is stopping it from happening now? Anyone ever hear of Mt St Helens or Krakatoa? The entire ring of fire has been more active in recent years than any time on record. Yellowstone is showing every sign of increased activity and there has been a lava dome rising from below for a number of years, exactly what happens before an eruption. The only thing alarmist was the 2/3 quote, never heard that one before. The quote I heard was 1/3 of the US would be affected directly. Possibly 2/3 would have ash falls but so would most of the world since the ash would reach the stratosphere. Denver is toast as well as any city within 500 miles with severe damage extending to 1000 miles or more. Millions would be lost in the first hours and millions more from starvation. It would affect the world climate for many years and ironically would reverse some of the global warming for a time. The world won't end but it will be devastating.

    People should be concerned since it WILL erupt eventually. What are the odds of it erupting within the next 10 years? 50/50. Rediculous? look at it this way, it's showing every sign of an eruption and it's due for one. It either happens or it doesn't, 50/50. That's the God's honest truth. Any other statistic is pointless because they all assume it may never erupt. Once an event like this comes due it will happen whether it's tomorrow or in a thousand years. Is there a chance it'll be in a thousand years? Of coarse but the whole point no one will admit to is it's just as likely to be next year as in a 1000 years the odds are exactly the same.

    1. Re:Dangerous assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fell in to a burning ring of fire
      I went down,down,down
      and the flames went higher.
      And it burns,burns,burns
      the ring of fire
      the ring of fire.

  56. Tremors have begun ... by Skizzo · · Score: 1

    Tremors are beginning and that means the quake swarm is no longer "ordinary". http://www.seablogger.com/?p=12519

    1. Re:Tremors have begun ... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      That's not a big deal, just make sure you're always standing on a rock.

  57. Paging International Rescue! by argent · · Score: 1

    Didn't they have a mohole digger in one of Thunderbird 2's pods? Release the pressure on the magma chamber slowly and discover The Hood is behind the whole thing as a bonus!

  58. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by windex82 · · Score: 1

    I recall Countdown to Doomsday was on the SciFi channel a while back. (Sorry, 600,000 triggered the memory) It went over the 10 most likely doomsday events and was kind of unsettling. Most of the events that were "time-based" (supervolcano, meteor, giant solar flare) were real close to the interval they seem to occur at.

    I take it with a grain of salt though, my lifetime is a very tiny percentage of any of those intervals.

  59. Taco Department by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Figured taco would post this story from the "maybe the volcano might warm me up dept"

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  60. we're off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap! I better get off slashdot and go out and get laid....

    ok, who am I kidding? Bring it on!

  61. In Library of Congress units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many Library of Congresses is that?

    1 or 0 depending on which way the wind blows.

  62. It wont blow.. yet by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Its not the end of 2012.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  63. How much of a rise? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 0

    Combine that with a rapid rise in elevation over the past three years

    How much of a rise are we talking about?

    1. Re:How much of a rise? by velocirupture · · Score: 1

      ~7cm yearly past 3, 1-1,5cm norm.

    2. Re:How much of a rise? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Combine that with a rapid rise in elevation over the past three years

      How much of a rise are we talking about?

      From wikipedia:

      The upward movement of the Yellowstone caldera floor â" almost 3 inches (7 centimeters) per year for the past three years â" is more than three times greater than ever observed since such measurements began in 1923.

  64. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The *luck* of the United States recently? WTFF?

    You elect an imbecile to the most powerful office in the world. Twice.

    You spend/borrow your way into a financial crisis.

    You alienate and disgust 99% of the rest of the world with (just off the top of my head) Guantanamo, bombings inside Pakistan, extraordinary renditions, the whole Iraq fuckup, Kyoto, etc.

    You remove more and more of the basic rights of your own citizens.

    Apart from that, please think about the majority of humanity around the world, count your fucking blessings, and shut the fuck up. Try living just one day as an average Somali, Haitian, Zimbabwean, or Burmese.

  65. Doubly bright side... by eclectro · · Score: 1

    He will lose a few pounds when he is foraging for berries and bugs, and running away from hungry wolves like the rest of us.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  66. Um no by snaildarter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um no, dude, you don't really get it. If Yellowstone blows, there is no volcano eruption in human history that even remotely comes close. Mt. St. Helens would look like a fart standing next to Chernobyl. Areas 400 miles away would get covered in a foot of ash. There is just nothing like it.

    Here is a nice, graphical link for you to look at:

    link

    The number of deaths could be staggering. That foot of ash, even 400 miles away in Denver, would collapse most roofs, and any with people in them would get severely injured or die. It would be the end of the U.S. as a global superpower, and there would be wars. You are naive.

    --
    Japanese scientist: Technically, sir, tomatoes are fags. Military scientist: He means fruits.
    1. Re:Um no by delong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, the number of deaths would be negligible. Yellowstone sits in the most sparsely populated region of the U.S. The actual direct destructive power of the volcano would only effect a 40 square mile area, which except for Jackson Hole, is largely empty.

      Laramie, Cheyenne, Bozeman, Billings, etc would be hit hard by ashfall, but Denver would only get about a foot. Folks know ash collapses roofs. So, gasp, folks would clear the ash as it accumulates. Many or most people would evacuate anyway.

      This is alarmism. At its worst, there will be an immense disruption of the electrical and telecommunications grid, immense expense from ash damage and removal, alot of immediate deaths and some ash deaths.

    2. Re:Um no by WindowlessView · · Score: 2, Funny

      there will be an immense disruption of the electrical and telecommunications grid, immense expense from ash damage and removal

      Now that's what I call a shovel-ready WPA project!

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    3. Re:Um no by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Right, so all the usual slashdotisms aside, how far would one need to be from the yellowstone caldera in order to be safe from the immediate threats caused by lava and overwhelming amounts of ash? Forget about the long term impact to the breadbasket. And where are the legitimately scientific up-to-the-minute web resources that can explain the situation in laymen's terms? I live 1,041 miles to the southwest of the volcano, so I'd like something more than jokes about the economy and "fuck, we're all going to fucking die!"

    4. Re:Um no by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At its worst, there will be an immense disruption of the electrical and telecommunications grid, immense expense from ash damage and removal, alot of immediate deaths and some ash deaths.

      You forgot one little detail: Widespread subzero temperatures and no new food anywhere on the planet for at least a year.

    5. Re:Um no by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      You're far enough from the immediate threat of lava.

      If you live in north or middle America, you're not far away enough from the ash.

    6. Re:Um no by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      It's still more secure than a WEP project.

    7. Re:Um no by mccoma · · Score: 1

      "Denver would only get about a foot" - heck - Denver probably got more snow than that this week in one snow storm. I would be more worried about lung / equipment problems than the roof collapsing.

    8. Re:Um no by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    9. Re:Um no by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Ash fall for one of the bigger past eruptions has been
      traced by geologists to be this size.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HuckleberryRidgeTuff.jpg

      It covers most of 13 states.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    10. Re:Um no by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um. So that means one foot of rock over your roof. Can it take it? I believe most roofs can only handle half that amount of volcanic ash, especially if it rains (which it will, typical volcano behaviour).

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    11. Re:Um no by mccoma · · Score: 1

      I am saying most people in the area most likely to be affected will deal with the roof ok, I would be more worried about the other effects of the ash.

    12. Re:Um no by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Folks know ash collapses roofs. So, gasp, folks would clear the ash as it accumulates.

      How, exactly? I suppose everyone will climb into their roofs with dusters... And that's just for the roofs that are accessible to non-professionals.

      Many or most people would evacuate anyway.

      Where to? The ash could cover most of North America. And with the transport system completely shut down by ash, no-one's going anywhere. Even if you got somewhere, there wouldn't be enough food as the ash would kill it all.

    13. Re:Um no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Depends where you live. I used to do architectural design in a place that routinely required designing the building for 100 lb-per-sq-ft snow loads on the roof, and it wasn't all that far from Denver. Don't know what their building code requires, but people living in the Rockies are used to both heavy loads on the roof and having to shovel them off periodically. Building collapse in the area would not be one of the primary concerns for me.

    14. Re:Um no by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Folks know ash collapses roofs. So, gasp, folks would clear the ash as it accumulates.

      Oh, I wonder why nobody else thought of that simple idea!

    15. Re:Um no by delong · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you actually believe this? "No new food on the planet for a year?" Give me a break. This supervolcano, even in a worst case scenario, would not be sufficient to create global subzero temperatures and block enough sunlight to prevent crops globally. This is more alarmist garbage unsupported by any facts.

    16. Re:Um no by not_anne · · Score: 1

      Ash will rise high into the atmosphere and fall for months if not years after such an eruption.

      Mt. St. Helens erupted in May 1980. Seven months later, my family visited my uncle in Basalt Colorado that December, and a very light dusting of ash was still falling, covering all the snow in a thin blanket of grey.

      --
      My comments here are my own; I do not speak for my employer.
    17. Re:Um no by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't I believe it? Less than 200 years ago a volcano only 1/1000 of that size caused the "year without a summer", which disrupted crops worldwide. If that were to happen again today, there would be widespread starvation.

      Where do you get your idea that an event several orders of magnitude greater would be no big deal?

    18. Re:Um no by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't I believe it? Less than 200 years ago a volcano only 1/1000 of that size caused the "year without a summer", which disrupted crops worldwide. If that were to happen again today, there would be widespread starvation.
      Where do you get your idea that an event several orders of magnitude greater would be no big deal?

      Observation of the mass extinction at 700,000 years ago.

      Which mass extinction?

      Exactly.

      The last major eruption at Jellystone (and therefore the best guess as to what's going to happen next time) didn't produce a mass extinction, so the odds aRE THAN THE NEXT ONE WON'T (Damned CapsLock) either.

      OK, it's quite credible that, say, 99.9% of the human population of the planet will die. That's not particularly important. With the potential to double population each generation (which isn't really working hard at it, that's around 450 years to return to current populations, 400 or so years to return to a globally significant population. A lot of the buildings will still be usable, and with a year or two for the great die-off to really get going, one would hope that significant preservation of technology would happen.

      Me - I think that island nations with relatively small populations would have a pretty good chance of surviving almost unscathed.

      I was going to write what I thought was the most likely country to survive, in the event. But why would I make myself trouble? Just get there first and then encourage them to shoot down incoming air planes - there aren't enough big passenger boats to worry about, and they'll have as much trouble getting food as anyone else once people start to cotton on.

      from this end of the telescope, losing 99.9% of the population looks pretty bad ; from the other end of the century, it will hardly seem important.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    19. Re:Um no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of my cans of Campbell's have 2010 date on them. Spaghetti even longer. Add to that fact I can make rounds for my USP and we have movie! But I ain't delivering any damn mail...

    20. Re:Um no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ash will provide all the food I need. I'm friends with lots of people who have asthma :)

    21. Re:Um no by DadsGirl23 · · Score: 1

      The immediate effects would be few deaths...it's in the long term that would kill us. Supervolcanoes have the capacity to blow tremendous amounts of ash into the highest level of the atmosphere. The ash would then circulate the globe and block out the sun causing billions to die due to the lack of food. People are starving in third-world countries today with now major catastrophes. Can you imagine industrialized countries starving? You'd be better off getting your hands on as many weapons as possible because you would have to kill to eat.

    22. Re:Um no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less than 200 years ago a volcano only 1/1000 of that size caused the "year without a summer", which disrupted crops worldwide. If that were to happen again today, there would be widespread starvation.

      Can you cite a source for "1/1000 of that size"? According to Wikipedia the last Yellowstone eruption was about ten times as powerful as the one that caused the "year without a summer".

  67. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? I predicted they would break together.

    They're linked and any mathematical model that didn't take that into account wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

  68. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    The Year God Decided He Really Hated America

    Lemme correct that for you ....
    The Year God Decided to show how much He Hated America

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  69. WTF? by db32 · · Score: 1

    One article says last eruption was 70,000 years, the other says 640,000 years ago. Someone seems to be a bit off...

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:WTF? by pohl · · Score: 1

      70k years ago was the last SV eruption
      of any SV.  640k years ago was the
      last eruption of the one at yellowstone,
      which seems to go of periodically every
      600k years or so.  I don't know where
      the SV was that went off 70k years ago.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    2. Re:WTF? by db32 · · Score: 1

      Actually I found the answer a bit later, that isn't really the case here. The last time yellowstone had a super volcano eruption was 640k years ago. The last time yellowstone had a lava flow was 70k years ago.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    3. Re:WTF? by Opyros · · Score: 1

      The 70000 B.P. event was the Toba eruption.

  70. Oh, great by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    There's only one thing I fear more than Mount Rainier burning 250,000 to 500,000 people alive (with an equal number suffering from severe burns) and that's Yellowstone.

    Good thing the winds go east ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  71. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    If it happens during his term, and he doesn't do anything to help, you're damn right he'll be blamed. George Bush doesn't care about ash-covered people.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  72. It will blow the day after the cubs win it all! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    It will blow the day after the cubs win it all!

    1. Re:It will blow the day after the cubs win it all! by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

      It will blow the day after the cubs win it all!

      Whew! So glad that Yellowstone will never erupt.

      --
      Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  73. Totally by SageMusings · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hell, I could be so bold as to state some asinine comment on Slashdot and not care about Karma or mod points:

    I love MS, hate Apple, think Linux is cute but just a toy, and man enough to admit I own a copy of the Joy Luck Club on DVD. ...I feel liberated.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
    1. Re:Totally by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Damn you ironic moderators!

    2. Re:Totally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, while we are at it.

      -I used to masturbate thinking of my mon when I was 14.

      -I am posting this from a windows server 2008 box. And while I am using firefox, I have IE open.

      -My MacBook is closed somewhere.

  74. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try living just one day as an average Somali, Haitian, Zimbabwean, or Burmese.

    I'm sure you're posting to Slashdot from an average Somali, Haitian, Zimbabwean, or Burmese household. On a high horse, no doubt.

  75. Some scientific perspective... by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...courtesy the U.S. Geological Survey:

    Fortunately, the Yellowstone volcanic system shows no signs that it is headed toward such an eruption in the near future. In fact, the probability of any such event occurring at Yellowstone within the next few thousand years is exceedingly low.

    ...

    Lava flows and small volcanic eruptions occur only rarely--none in the past 70,000 years. Massive caldera-forming eruptions, though the most potentially devastating of Yellowstone's hazards, are extremely rare--only three have occurred in the past several million years. U.S. Geological Survey, University of Utah, and National Park Service scientists with the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory (YVO) see no evidence that another such cataclysmic eruption will occur at Yellowstone in the foreseeable future.

    (emphasis mine)

    As for that "several million years" figure for a devastating explosion of the kind TFA is describing, consider that the United States as a nation is still less than 250 years old. I'm not saying it can't happen, but the idea that "it hasn't happened in a long time so it must be ready to happen now" is just a popular Las Vegas delusion.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Some scientific perspective... by Fished · · Score: 1

      Some scientific perspective... from 2005. Granted, I'm not ready to go paranoid yet, but surely a bunch of earthquakes sort of changes the odds?

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    2. Re:Some scientific perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics are useful. The last three eruptions were spaced 800 and 660 thousand years apart, and the most recent one happened 640 thousand years ago. This tells us that the expected spacing is 730 thousand years with a standard deviation of 99 thousand years. Since we are 90 thousand years from the next eruption, a simple plot of the normal curve tells us that the probability of it erupting is 1 in 40 million for each year of our lives. Similarly, the probability of it erupting in the next 100 years is 1 in 37,512.

      The good news is, if it erupts a fourth time, the descendants of the survivors will have a much easier time narrowing down the fifth eruption.

    3. Re:Some scientific perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, 1 in 4200 for that last number. The 37,000 is for 10 years.

    4. Re:Some scientific perspective... by zwei2stein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (emphasis mine)

      As for that "several million years" figure for a devastating explosion of the kind TFA is describing, consider that the United States as a nation is still less than 250 years old. I'm not saying it can't happen, but the idea that "it hasn't happened in a long time so it must be ready to happen now" is just a popular Las Vegas delusion.

      Problem is, that this statistical delusion is delusion only if you examine unconnected "mathematical" events.

      But this supervolcano explosion thing is different: pressure builds up till it explodes. Question is when pressure is high enough so that its boom time. And we know three previous instances of how long it took.

      Propability does not apply, statistics do. Nor "we know shit about this" applies.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    5. Re:Some scientific perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One error in the story is referring to caldera forming eruptions. When super volcanoes blow they don't form calderas the blast is too big and sudden. It's why they are hard to spot most have few signs on the surface. It took a long time for them to realize Yellowstone was a super volcano because it's so massive they simply thought it was a valley. The danger is in assuming it can't happen because of geological time. It will happen period. Will it happen in the next 100 years? Probably not but the point is it's just as likely to happen this year as it is in 10,000 years. The signs are bad they just don't want to panic people. It's unlikely to blow but saying there's virtually zero chance is the same BS that gets us into trouble with every natural disaster. You build dikes to handle a once in a 100 year storm then 150 years later they get wiped out by one that was a once in 500 year storm. Once in 500 year storms do happen people and some times they happen twice in a 100 years. Can't predict nature so the best bet is be prepared.

    6. Re:Some scientific perspective... by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Exactly

      One thing is the long-term study and prediction, another, indicators of seismic and volcanic activity (which is kind of happening right now)

      It's not because it's rare that means that it's not going to happen, quite the opposite actually.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    7. Re:Some scientific perspective... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      This tells us that the expected spacing is 730 thousand years with a standard deviation of 99 thousand years.

      No it doesn't. The best estimate for the expecting spacing is 730 thousand years and the best estimate for the standard deviation is 99 thousand years, but given that we're working with a sample size of 2 you can't have any faith in the accuracy of those values.

      If you want to quote a value as "the expected spacing" then it should be (730 plus/minus 99) thousand years. As for the rest of the post: you're assuming a normal distribution with no justification; and even if everything else could be justified, the probabilities you quote are bogus because you should be using probabilities conditional on the fact that it hasn't erupted in 640 thousand years. And there's no way you can possibly justify 5 sig. fig.

    8. Re:Some scientific perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is no delusion. It is statistics. Don't be retarded.

    9. Re:Some scientific perspective... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      And we know three previous instances of how long it took.

      How long did it take the first one to happen?

    10. Re:Some scientific perspective... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      See, this is what I'm talking about. A bunch of the world's most respected geologists say "we see zero evidence that this is likely to happen in the next thousand years -- zero, zip none." And then you come along -- please cite your geological expertise -- and say, "Well that was four years ago. Let's see what they say now." Are you kidding? Wake me up when the USGS starts advising people to evacuate the Midwest, but until that happens, the chance of Yellowstone destroying the earth this year is exactly the same as it was five years ago.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  76. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yellowstone has been "about to blow" for a while now. Hasn't anyone here taken Geology?

    1. Re:Old news by sveard · · Score: 1

      and statistics

  77. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many Library of Congresses is that?

    All of them

  78. just speculating by shakuni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has tapping this as an energy source ever been considered ? i am not a geologist but I am thinking if there is so much geothermal energy right beneath our feet (probably very deep) of such enormous magnitude there could be a way to tap into this.

    1. Re:just speculating by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Has tapping this as an energy source ever been considered ? i am not a geologist but I am thinking if there is so much geothermal energy right beneath our feet (probably very deep) of such enormous magnitude there could be a way to tap into this.

      Yes, it's actually going to be used to get things in orbit. If you want something to go high into the atmosphere, just put it around the caldera and wait.

      I'm sure it's more energy than humanity has ever needed, but it's pretty hard to profit from an explosion that you can't control and that will destroy everything near it. At least until we have force fields that can absorb the thermal energy and store it in an extremely dense state.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    2. Re:just speculating by RockDoctor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has tapping this as an energy source ever been considered ?

      Short answer OK for you?

      Yes.

      i am not a geologist

      I am, and I've written enough pages on this topic already to not want to write much more unless you're seriously interested.

      but I am thinking if there is so much geothermal energy right beneath our feet (probably very deep) of such enormous magnitude there could be a way to tap into this.

      Yes, there are ways to do it, both on the drawing board and under active development. But there are also significant hazards to doing it precisely here. Read my other replies in this thread (filtering out the ones where I was being funny), and you'll be better informed and could probably work out some of the issues yourself. Bear in mind the old joke that "if we knew what we were doing, we couldn't call it research".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  79. Exact Date by notcreative · · Score: 1

    This will obviously occur on Jan 19th, 2009 to round out the Bush administration.

  80. Geothermal Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, this probably won't be a big deal once geo-scientists can approximate when to expect large explosions.

    We would just need to tap the geothermal energy under yellowstone at a rate equivalent to the energy created from a pressure build up.

    Even though the yellowstone caldera is geographically vast, the amount of time it takes for the yellowstone to build up enough energy to erupt probably means that the rate at which the geothermal energy is accumulating is fairly low.

    Even if scientists said yellowstone would blow up within 5 years, we could probably fix the problem with current geothermal technology.

    So not the drama.

    1. Re:Geothermal Energy by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Well one problem is that sometimes hydrothermal explosions
      can occur like the one that did 13,000 years ago that blow
      a 5km diameter hole in the Earth.

      Your entire Geothermal plant system would be obliterated.

      Granted 13,000 yrs is infrequent, but I am betting Hydrothermals
      can occur anytime enough of Yellowstone lake seep down near
      the magma via an Earthquake created rift.

      It would be dicey at best.

      Safer power would be to tap the Florida current underwater
      with shrouded turbines or the equivalent.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    2. Re:Geothermal Energy by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Well one problem is that sometimes hydrothermal explosions can occur like the one that did 13,000 years ago that blow a 5km diameter hole in the Earth.

      [/self : puts my "I'm a professional geologist" hat on]

      What the fubarite are you referring to?

      (Fubarite is a rock type first described in the Antarctic Peninsula.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  81. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Our models of vulcanism are incompletely understood

    We just need to think more logically.

  82. An idiot twice over! by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Here's what YOU said:

    Pumping waste chemical weapons into the subsurface under Rock Flats = Pumping stuff underground = Increases pressure.

    Here's what I said:

    Hey, here's a thought - PUMPING STUFF UNDERGROUND increases pressure.

    You may want to read what *I* actually said before you make some pitiful attempt to insult me and shoot yourself in the foot instead.

    Since the basic premise was that drilling for oil would somehow cause a volcano, I thought I might point out that the example he gave (known to cause small movements of earth) was of PUMPING STUFF INTO THE GROUND. Which is the opposite of PUMPING STUFF OUT OF THE GROUND.

    I hope that was simple enough for your obviously tiny brain to comprehend as you seem to have missed it last time round.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:An idiot twice over! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see. Didn't notice that the person who replied wasn't the original poster. Can't properly close bold tags. Yeah, we all know who is the idiot here.

  83. What Models are You Smoking? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    All the mathematical models claimed that the US Financial credit market and the Housing Bubble wouldn't burst at the same time...

    Huh? I know a lot of economists were surprised by the collapse of the financial markets. But you talk as if they collapse of housing prices is a mysterious coincidence. It's not. When it's hard to borrow money, it's impossible to speculate in real-estate.

  84. Geothermal Energy by Caspase9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly, this isn't that big of a deal. Even though the Yellowstone caldera is geographically huge, the very fact that it takes half a millennium to build up enough pressure to erupt shows that the geothermal energy is stored under yellowstone very slowly. Or at least the majority of it is released via the geysers and shift in tectonics. If geoscientists had firm evidence that yellowstone had a high chance of eruption within the next 10 years, all we would need to do is build geothermal plants and suck up as much geothermal energy as the mantle puts in. So not the drama.

  85. California? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    How likely would it be that this could set off that potential earthquake on the California coast? (or vice-versa)

    1. Re:California? by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Zero.

    2. Re:California? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh please, that would be so cool! let's reshape the west coast AND the heartland simultaneously!

    3. Re:California? by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      Dude, do you not know that saying that there's "zero chance" of something happenning is bad luck?

      Have you never seen a disaster movie? ;)

      If it happens, and we lose California, it's now Officially Your Fault.

    4. Re:California? by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 1

      Earthquakes don't matter to dead people

  86. 2/3 of US... More like the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the whole "2/3 of the US destroyed bit" is kinda irrelevant considering an explosion of that magnitude would affect the atmosphere such as to ruin life for the whole planet. I figure it would involve the death of the human race.
    But then again, I also don't believe this eruption is going to happen.

    1. Re:2/3 of US... More like the world by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 1

      Don't kid yourself. Pretty much all of our geological knowledge points toward the prediction that it will, in fact, happen.

      In a decade or a couple hundred thousand of years, we don't know that yet.

    2. Re:2/3 of US... More like the world by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      The entire human race? Not so likely.

      Most of the human race? Very possible.

  87. This is Darl McBride's fault by JonnyO · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is it with things named/called Caldera

  88. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by coaxial · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The three last eruptions were 6000, 700, and 2500 times Mt St Helens 1980 (MSHE), which released 1.67 exajoules (1.673 x 10^18 Joules). According to the esteemed Christopher Thomas 1 Burning Library of Congress (BLoC) is equivalent to 4 petajoules (4 x 10^15 Joules). Converting MSHE to BLoC gives 1 MSHE = 418.25 BLoC. So the last three eruptions were 2509500 BLoC, 292775 BLoC, and 1045625 BLoC, respectively. Since we don't know how big the next eruption will be, let's just assume the mean of the last 3, and that's 1282633.3 BLoCs, or 39% of the total solar energy that strikes the surface of the Earth.

  89. caldera? Utah? by schamarty · · Score: 1

    from the last link in TFS: "too weak to be felt by humans for the most part but picked up by the seismometers at the University of Utah", and "the giant caldera we affectionately call Yellowstone has blown every 600,000 years or so..."

    Slashdotters, I'm disappointed you didn't make the connection yet...

  90. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Daswolfen · · Score: 1

    No.. Liberals will blame Bush even if it doesn't happen for 10,000 years. Don' you know he is the official cause of everything bad according to the Democrats?

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  91. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That time of the month....

  92. 2038 vs Re:2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. We'll still have to fix it, but we'll be a road warrior-hacker battling zombies and tribes of cannibalistic crazed humans in order to patch the code which will prevent the remaining active missile silos from crashing and launching during the epoch-fail of the Unix servers.

  93. That explains... by sponglish · · Score: 1

    Why my Joo Janta 200 Super-Chromatic Peril Sensitive Sunglasses just went dead black.

    Now where the heck is my towel?!!

    --
    "I improvise. It's my greatest talent. I prefer situations to plans..." --Wintermute, William Gibson's "Neuromancer"
    1. Re:That explains... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Now where the heck is my towel?!!

      Sorry frood, you've just failed your Hoopiness 1.0.1 Practical Exam.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  94. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately we don't have firsthand data on what a very large caldera forming eruption looks like in its earliest stages. ;-)

    If we look at smaller eruptions elsewhere, such as Mt. Mazama in Oregon when it erupted to form Crater Lake, there's enough information to piece together a pretty good narrative. (Unfortunately I am not familiar with much research from Yellowstone documenting the geologic evidence for precursors to its climactic eruptions, although I am aware of the many smaller eruptions that preceded the big ones.)

    At Crater Lake the narrative is a bit disconcerting in that it appears to have started off like any other bog standard plinian eruption, which is admittedly not a trifling event, but then as that eruption wound down and you might have expected the eruption to end, it was then that the caldera collapse began which unleashed the main show. The point is just because an eruption starts out small doesn't mean it will end that way -- especially in this kind of volcanic system where you have a good sized reservoir of fairly explosive silica rich magma. On the other hand, just because there's a small eruption it doesn't mean a large one is imminent.

    Mt. Mazama was a large complex edifice built of countless prior eruptions, and even fairly large lava flows that erupted only shortly before the caldera forming event; a couple hundred years prior to the climactic eruption a very thick rhyodacite lava flow squeezed down the flank to form what we now call Llao Rock.

  95. Oh yeah? by kwabbles · · Score: 1

    Well... then if it DOES blow up in the next couple of days it'll all be YOUR fault that I stopped packing for Australia.

    --
    Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
    1. Re:Oh yeah? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      Well... then if it DOES blow up in the next couple of days it'll all be YOUR fault that I stopped packing for Australia.

      I will try to remember to apologize in that event.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  96. possible Zune theory? by mincognito · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I wonder if that also explains Z2K9? Of course it's also possible that God's hatred for Zunes has nothing to do with his hate for America.

    1. Re:possible Zune theory? by el3mentary · · Score: 1

      God's an Apple fanboy, of course he hates Zunes.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  97. Karma anyone? by geeper · · Score: 0

    OK, so the worlds about to end. All I'd like is to go out with a little karma on here. I've tried hard but gained none regardless because of some funny comments I've made. Please...please...its not like your going to need it after a few hours!

    --
    Error reading device 'Signature'. (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?
  98. Alternative title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Yellowstone about to blow its wad?

  99. Re:Frosty Piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a wonderful and inspiring story!

    Thank you and happy new year!

  100. What if... by IF_I_was_G*d · · Score: 1

    There seems to be an agreement that this supervolcano will blow... there seems to be an agreement that it is overdue... What if we found out that it blows - let's say - in 2012? How would it change history between now and then? Although we can't be certain, should not we do it anyway?

  101. schedule that trip by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    See Old Faithful while you can...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:schedule that trip by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      If you're lucky you'll have front row seats to the end of the world.

  102. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...One?...

  103. WMD by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

    just don't tell congress or we might send in troups to find the source of the earths weapons of mass destruction

  104. a year for bad luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about bad luck! First the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the world, and now this...

  105. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    Um... 2/3 of an LoC?

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  106. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

    I worship you. Great post!

    --
    I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
  107. Let's hope it's after Jan 20... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    By then, hopefully, Dick Cheney will be back in his home state of Wyoming. :)

    I hope the aliens at Devil's Tower get outta there before it all blows to hell, though. I wouldn't want those widdle aliens being hurt...I hear they're really into mashed potatoes, so they can't be all-bad, right?

  108. Time frame seems wrong... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    The articles says an eruption happens every 600,000 years but the wikipedia link says "142 or more caldera-forming eruptions have occurred from the SRPY hotspot within the past 17 million years" which suggests an average interval of only 120,000 years for a caldera-forming eruption.

    1. Re:Time frame seems wrong... by ImOnlySleeping · · Score: 1

      probably not linear

      --
      Everybody seems to think I'm lazy I don't mind, I think they're crazy
  109. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by evilbessie · · Score: 1

    "...using imaginary money as cards"

    They were using complex derivatives of imaginary money

  110. Geothermal Energy by Caspase9 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, this isn't that big of a deal. Even though the Yellowstone caldera is geographically huge, the very fact that it takes half a millennium to build up enough pressure to erupt shows that the geothermal energy is stored under yellowstone very slowly. Or at least the majority of it is released via the geysers and shift in tectonics.

    If geoscientists had firm evidence that yellowstone had a high chance of eruption within the next 10 years, all we would need to do is build geothermal plants and suck up as much geothermal energy as the mantle puts in.

    So not the drama..

  111. Is that within 75,000 years by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    Ironically, when the US decided to dispose of its nuclear waste in Utah, the time horizon was that the containment should be for around 75000, while as it takes about 2 million years for most of the radioactive isotopes to decay. I think calculations like this assume something else is going to kill us before our waste does. Who knows, maybe nature will be far more forgiving, and we will poison ourselves first.
    The world will end not with a bang, but with a whimper.
    -Read that on the bathroom wall when I was a kid.

    1. Re:Is that within 75,000 years by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      This is going to be a 75,000 year version of Wilder's "The Skin of Our Teeth" if we're around for that long and haven't come up with cures for cancer. In which case it'd be most likely in a Medieval or worse society where the minor chance of radiation damage wouldn't be statistically significant anyway.

      IIRC there was a study that concluded if you took all the reactor waste the USA produces, waited 10 years, then spread it evenly over the whole country, it would probably cause 200 additional cases of cancer a year.

  112. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    How many Library of Congresses is that?

    $ units
    2445 units, 71 prefixes, 33 nonlinear units

    You have: area-of-usa * 2/3
    You want: library-of-congress
    conformability error
            5.33e12 m^2
            1.6e14 bit

  113. Southern Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sell real estate in Southern Chile. Give me a call when you are ready.

  114. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by BigGerman · · Score: 1

    Sigh. Maybe _because_ we behaived the way we did, we are _not_ like average Somali, etc.?

  115. Re:Good time to start pumping out GHG then! Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *** Troll alert ****

    Now if only you Americans would learn to keep your airborn pollution to your own borders.

    Still look on the bright side - your homemade volcano may actuall win the science fair this year.

  116. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it should do it then, just for the humor value.

    God: "Pull my finger..."

  117. My favorite daily links (USGS) by xx01dk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just thought I'd post these up again:

    Main global earthquake map

    List of EQs in the SouthWest

    Display of drum recorders for the Southwest

    Cheers and Happy New Years!

    --
    There is simply too much glass..
  118. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    No.. Liberals will blame Bush even if it doesn't happen for 10,000 years. Don' you know he is the official cause of everything bad according to the Democrats?

    And conservatives blame liberals. Even after this thing blows up, the world will continue to turn.

    Hopefully.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  119. Shit it never ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So first I get a good job, then I fuck my chances up with the girl I love. Then I fail out of my job, get another one. Then I get forced by parents to spend money on a car I don't want (cosigner, no vehicle, need to get to work somehow...). Now I've got an extremely-fucking-cute girl that likes me and I just need to backpedal a bit because I almost fucked THAT up... I'm close... my life might actually not be so bad...

    BAM END OF THE FUCKING WORLD

  120. I know whos fault this is by hamburgler007 · · Score: 1

    Two words, President Bush.

  121. One question by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Did the government tell you to post that??

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  122. DO NOT NAME YOUR DOG TOBA! by rthille · · Score: 4, Funny

    We did, and she's spent her entire life trying to live up to the destructive power of her namesake.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  123. Dude by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Funny

    You owe Bush so much, for keep us safe and for keep the crisises that have happened from going realy bad.

  124. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe there is an error in the original equation:

    115M books * 1 kg/book * 390 kJ/mol CO2 / 0.012 mol C/kg ...or on the order of 4 petajoules.

    1 mol of C = 12 grams, or 0.012 g/mol of C. Not 0.012 mol C/kg.

    Now, to make things easier, we can apply the value for the energy released by burning wood pulp given by the U.S. Department of Energy which is: 17455.6 J/g. Reference:

    This would give us: 115M books * 1 kg/book * 1000 grams/kg * 17455.6 J/g = 2 * 10^15

    Which is still on the same order of magnitude as the original equation, but also means we don't have to worry about the mass of oxygen consumed by the burning, or the mass of the CO2 given off. (Thanks to the DoE for giving the Gross Heat of Combustion for cellulose products.)

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  125. Um, no. by dtmos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Volcanic "ash" is not burning wood "ash". Volcanic ash is actually pulverized, powdered rock that only superficially resembles wood ash as it falls and collects on the ground. It's not the result of any burning process.

    1. Re:Um, no. by davidphogan74 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you get out the leaf blower. Problem solved, right?

    2. Re:Um, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless it gets wet in which case it turns into a cement-like substance. Its also rather dense, hope it doesn't accumulate on rooftops before a rain, otherwise it could compromise the load-bearing.

    3. Re:Um, no. by mrjb · · Score: 2, Informative

      That rock ash still has high mineral content and makes for fertile ground.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  126. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

    George Bush doesn't like...Catholics?

  127. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More likely what happens when you replace a philandering rhode scholar redneck with a beer guzzling frat boy redneck. The best leader is not the one that one wishes to have over to the bar b que.

  128. More, or Less? by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many small earthquakes may or may not be a sign of increased pressure, but it's definitely a sign of increased release of pressure. Not being released in small increments could mean a major quake later.

    Rather than worrying about lots of earthquakes, maybe we should be worried when there's a lack of them.

    There, that should give the professional Doomsdayologists in the media plenty to write about, since the lack of seismic activity almost everywhere may be a sign of impending (sometime, maybe, who knows, but let's call it this anyway) doom.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  129. am i the only one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who thinks that adds embedded into comments just brought slashdot even closer to digg?

  130. Supervolcanoes are fun by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    There was a good overview in SciAm 2 years ago: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-secrets-of-supervolca

  131. 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its not going to blow until the year 2012, That is when the Mayan calendar ends and it is said the world as we know it will end.

  132. /. is too busy with RIAA, Nintendo, iPod & Idl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot = Worst news site EVAH!

  133. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by praedictus · · Score: 1

    I checked some of the monitoring stations, http://www.seis.utah.edu/helicorder/heli/yellowstone/Uuss.YTP_EHZ_WY.2008123100.gif for example. The background tremors seem to be picking up, but it might just be wind, as a front recently passed through. I think I'll be watching this one for a few days.

    --
    Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
  134. The question is by dataninja · · Score: 0

    Would my 500 GB porn collection survive the initial shock created by the vibrations or do I need to move everyting to DVD's and Flash drives.

  135. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing has happened at Guantanamo that hasn't routinely happened to terrorist suspects detained in France for five solid decades. Tell me, how many times have you expressed your alienation and disgust with France? How about how Japan handles domestic crime suspects? Hmmm?

    If the actions of the U.S. have disgusted 99% of the world, it's only because somewhere around 95% of the world is wallowing in hypocrisy. So fuck them, and fuck you.

  136. life depends on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good thing that /. is always up to date with technology! Because this whole late-to-report supervolcano thing is not a concern to geeks :)

  137. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by sveard · · Score: 1

    The world will keep turning... the other way

  138. Maybe... by symbolset · · Score: 1

    If we spanked it with a ground burst of this 50 megaton supernuke, it would behave itself.

    Or maybe that would just make it angry.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  139. Some sobering facts by symbolset · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yellowstone will erupt in this dramatic fashion. The Siberian Traps will too. The 1.5km-diameter (or much more) space rock will definitely strike earth in the future. A comet will too. These aren't tinfoil hat ideas - everybody in the related sciences agrees that these events will occur. It's just a matter of time. Maybe it will be a long time, as we think about it usually, or maybe it will be a short one. Each of these events is neither more likely nor less likely to happen on a particular Monday a million years hence than they are on July 4, 2012.

    They will happen and when they happen there's a good chance they'll wipe out all human life still on the Earth. Events like these don't have to wipe out mankind. We can choose to not let that happen. Or not.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Some sobering facts by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      The 1.5km-diameter (or much more) space rock will definitely strike earth in the future. A comet will too

      Yeah, but we actually have the ability (in theory anyway) of doing something about those space rocks if they are detected far enough in advance. Not the same for a super-volcano.

      They will happen and when they happen there's a good chance they'll wipe out all human life still on the Earth

      I have more faith in humanity than that. We are pretty scrappy little buggers when we need to be.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Some sobering facts by AaxelB · · Score: 1

      Oh, come now, don't be such a downer. The earth could very well be completely destroyed before some or any of those other things occur.

    3. Re:Some sobering facts by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      • Yellowstone will erupt in this dramatic fashion. AGREED
      • The Siberian Traps will too. Nope
      • The 1.5km-diameter (or much more) space rock will definitely strike earth in the future. AGREED
      • A comet will too. AGREED
      • These aren't tinfoil hat ideas - everybody in the related sciences agrees that these events will occur.AGREED

      4 out of 5, not too bad.

      Something like the Siberian Traps is a near certainty, in the future of the Earth, but the Siberian Traps eruption itself (in the sense of, on that side of the Siberian Craton, or in the sense of the north-central part of the Asian continent, while that's still recognisable) ... well you're too specific to possibly be correct.

      Yes, these things are going to happen, probably repeatedly, in the future of the Earth. But probably not in the next week.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  140. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by Tailsfan · · Score: 1

    Interesting statement, Mr/Mrs. volcanologist.

  141. Food sources no problem. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    There will be no humans left to eat them there.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  142. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Unix+Ronin · · Score: 1

    Well played, sir. :)

  143. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    History books will refer to late 2008 as The Year God Decided He Really Hated America.

    But without Americans who would place God in history books?

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  144. The knowledge to make booze by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Will become valuable intellectual property, and a useful survival skill.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:The knowledge to make booze by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Printing directions now...

    2. Re:The knowledge to make booze by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Yeast and starch. Ferment a while. Distill. Edible starches like potatoes, grains and yams give drinkable booze. Inedibible starches like paper, wood grains, stems and leaves gives toxic booze best saved for invaders.

      /In case your directions weren't clear.

      //For cheap stuff, add sugar

      ///For pricey stuff, age with charcoal for 12 years or more.

      ////Fark slashies? What are those?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  145. On this one by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The odds are definitely with the house.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  146. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    How does that make sense to you? Are you implying people, born into relative privilege, are inherently more capable, responsible, and morally superior to those that were not? Enlighten me.

    I am interested in your views and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  147. And models of volcanic activity by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Are known to be created by dispassionate uninterested observers with no grants at stake or books to publish.

    Hell, some of the programmers even studied Earth Science a little.

    This is interesting news, and absolutely bears close monitoring, but I think it's a little premature to run around shouting that the sky is falling.

    The sky really is falling. Right now it's just firing warning shots but historically it has declared all-out war. This volcano will immolate much of the central US and cover much of the US in ash. It's just a matter of time. Is the time getting close? Hmm...

    It seems odd to me that the schedule of ELE for asteroids and comets, and the one for volcanoes is so much in synch. It's almost as if there were a clock counting down...

    Are we smart enough to figure this out like the enlightened beings we think we are, or are we doomed to the fate of the dinosaurs? Only time will tell.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:And models of volcanic activity by Unix+Ronin · · Score: 1

      The sky really is falling. Right now it's just firing warning shots but historically it has declared all-out war. This volcano will immolate much of the central US and cover much of the US in ash. It's just a matter of time. Is the time getting close? Hmm...

      Oh, sure. Stipulated. The odds are it will blow again, and when it does, it will be a doozy. Last time, it created the Central Washington scablands, a lava plain that's a mile thick in places.

      But in geological time, "any time now" could be ten years, or it could be ten thousand.

      Thought experiment: Suppose the vulcanologists looked at the data and said, "We believe the Yellowstone basin is going to erupt again within the next twelve months." What could we do? Can we evacuate two thirds of the US? Where to? Where will the evacuees live? I don't think even FEMA has that many tents.

      (Your point on vulcanism models is taken, sure. But at least they're actually studying data and trying to understand it, instead of just saying "Wouldn't it be cool if the economy worked like this? Hey, let's all just pretend it does!")

  148. Can you nuke it and induce it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still waiting for the big one in San Francisco and they're meant to happen every 75 years!

    But what really makes me curious is the possibility of inducing a volcanic outburt if you were to strike the site with a nuclear bomb (or two or three...)

    I mean if China/Russia dumped all of their nuclear arsenal on that one spot, which as a target seems like something you wouldn't care a whole lot about in terms of defense, could they cause a natural event that could do a whole lot of damage without widespread radiation?

    I suspect the truth is that even if all those nukes hit that one area, that wouldn't amount to enough energy to change things much...

  149. Fear-mongering hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is really overblown. Yellowstone has been having earthquake swarms for as long as records have been kept.

    Try:

    http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs100-03/

    and

    http://www.huliq.com/1/75269/yellowstone-volcano-alert-level-normal

    for more info.

  150. Relax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mayor from Jaws and the USGS guy and Seinfeld's "high-talker" condo developer from Dante's Peak assured me that nothing will happen.

    Hey, it's snowing again! Snow's kinda gray... (cough)

  151. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    If all the doomsday theories are right the American fundamentalists would be dead, and we're not all that bad outside of America.

  152. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Yeah. The argument goes as follows:

    Our relatives screwed over, or helped screw over natives who didnt fight back effectively. Because they are technologically inferior, they must be inferior completely. And that means whatever our relatives did was right, because we're here, and they're not.

    --
  153. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by butlerm · · Score: 1

    Solar energy in what unit of time? A day? A second?

  154. That was easy by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer threw a chair at it. Vista was deployed to Yellowstone park service and it sucked so hard that the pressure differential sucked the lava out. Is that so hard?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  155. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya make a couple of mistakes and...no one forgets.

  156. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1
    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  157. the world needs something like this. by luther349 · · Score: 0

    its sad but true. killing off life in large numbers hasn't happend in some time. the less people and other life on earth the less resouses used. humans probably wouldn't die off completely but the numbers would have a sharp decline something needed across the world.

    1. Re:the world needs something like this. by duhjim · · Score: 1

      Will slashdot survive the big volcano? Where is slashdot anyway?

    2. Re:the world needs something like this. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      the world needs something like this. its sad but true. killing off life in large numbers hasn't happend in some time. the less people and other life on earth the less resouses used. humans probably wouldn't die off completely but the numbers would have a sharp decline something needed across the world.

      No, it doesn't, you ass. The world needs nothing, it could give a damn how many of us are or are not living here. It will continue to do its thing. HUMANITY needs to reduce the resources it uses and start living in a more sustainable, eco-friendly manner for its own well being.

      As far as environmental impacts go, this will be far worse than any war we've ever seen.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  158. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Quixote · · Score: 1
    .... bombings inside Pakistan, ....

    You have it backwards. 99% of the world (outside of Pakistan) probably applauds the bombings and hopes for more of them.
    Hint: their main export

  159. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need a car analogy, libraries of congress are difficult to understand...

  160. Geothermal time, people! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, dedicate a portion of the land towards geothermal power. Any good cook, and any good engineer will tell you that when you want to keep heat under control, you reroute it elsewhere. Build some geothermal plants on the spot, you know how deep the magma is, then building vent/transfer systems around the caldera will in fact cool it down to prevent an eruption, AND you can sell the electricity generated for, well, generations.

    Sheiss, it's so simple, should I really be the one suggesting this? I'm a high school dropout (intellectual as I am), and it's really that obvious.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Geothermal time, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds so simple.

    2. Re:Geothermal time, people! by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice sounding idea. There's lots of energy down there. If we take it away, then everything down there ought to cool down, and become safe. Easy, no?

      Well, not really. What we have here is something like a giant steam engine boiler twenty miles across with the safety valve stuck down. In the days of steam locomotives, if you thought there might be a crack in a boiler, then you filled the whole system with water and pressurized it. That way, if the boiler gave a little, the water would escape and the pressure would rapidly drop. Water is not elastic, so you have little stored energy, and you don't get an explosion. Gas is much more springy so you would get much more bang and flying bits with pressurized gas. Superheated steam is like a really compressed gas with liquid densities, so that is even worse still.

      If you have an old-fashioned boiler with rivets, then as the pressure builds up, it will creak and the rivets will give a bit, and the steam will leak, a bit, but the whole system does not fail explosively. However, suppose you went around patching all the tiny leaks, and made the boiler rigid - it then has no way of failing other than by splitting in half. I have a nasty feeling that taking heat energy out of the weak places in the Yellowstone dome - if we could extract heat on that scale - would make it stiffer and more rigid, while the reduction in temperature may cause the gases to come out of solution, which would make the big explosion more likely.

      For safety reasons, what we need a series of local eruptions that release pressure and gas like a safety valve or a weeping rivet, but that won't do the environment much good ( though if we recover some of the energy and use it to replace coal-fired power stations, it might not be that bad either ). However, you aren't going to get me to climb onto a 20-mile long steam boiler with a stuck safety valve and drill little holes to relieve the pressure.

      We could build geothermal power stations, but the energy they are likely to be able to extract will be so tiny when compared to what's down there that they won't make any difference, unless you are talking of planet-scale engineering. On the plus side, I don't think we risk making things significantly worse either. Right now, and such power stations are in the wrong place for the US power grid.

      Nice idea, though. I hope someone, somewhere is seriously looking at ideas like this. However, in the particular case of Yellowstone, we don't know of other volcanoes like this, so we can only look at the past history of this one. Most of the supervolcano theory is pretty young, and I don't think we really know enough about the materials at the pressures and temperatures to be able to dick with it with confidence. We know it doesn't blow up often, so we would be very unlucky if it blew up tomorrow. Right now, the best plan is probably to measure it very carefully, and learn all we can about how volcanoes work in depth. These little earthquakes tend to come in bursts, but we don't really know why.

      Thank you for reading. We now return to our regular Internet schedule AAAGH! THIS IS IT OMFG WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE! And the angel sounded the trumpet a forth time and one third of the world's Zune players fell silent... Nostradamus has written: it's gonna be the Y2K bug all over again. Buy guns! Buy ammo!! THESE ARE THE END DAYS! (etc)...

    3. Re:Geothermal time, people! by misterjava66 · · Score: 1

      The problem with calldera volcanos is the VISCOSITY of the magma. I.e. the vicosity is too high. Extractng energy from th magma could cool it and increase the viscosity and make the situation worse. Modern science has never seen one of these things, and it is theorized that the last one nearly exterminated the human species. This is easily an 8 or 9 on the wipe humanity out scale.

  161. Essentially the first rickroll by slyborg · · Score: 1

    Or maybe tzolkin-roll.

  162. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by rohan972 · · Score: 1

    The *luck* of the United States recently? WTFF?

    You elect an imbecile to the most powerful office in the world. Twice.

    What are you talking about? Ben Bernanke has only held his position since 2006 and he was appointed, not elected.

  163. Global Sperm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Still, it would be a good plot for a Roland Emmerich movie. IMax 3D, for sure, so you can watch the pyroclastic flow hit you in the face."

    Oh the irony of someone with the moniker Screwmaster delivering that line.

  164. Quick, bail it out! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Throw hundreds of billions $ into it now! or we'll be doomeder than 1930's? (More doomed? Higher Doomification?)

  165. Good time to start pumping out bullets then! by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I also grew up training in martial arts which, after a while, typically includes some medical training (along the way I've ended up helping to treat everything up to and including a gunshot wound)."

    I knew we should be keeping our eyes on Ninjas. Now they're throwing bullets.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Good time to start pumping out bullets then! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I know you were going for funny and got the mod to match, but sadly the reality of that particular situation was anything but humorous. It's not something I'd care to do again (not that I wanted to do it in the first place).

      I'm just glad I kept myself together long enough to deal with things. That is one thing that the training was certainly good for. Ironically, keeping myself together and being "too calm" (in the sheriff's opinion) helped me save the life of someone I loved very much but ended up making me a suspect for something I didn't do.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  166. Some sobering moves. by Ostracus · · Score: 3, Funny

    "They will happen and when they happen there's a good chance they'll wipe out all human life still on the Earth. Events like these don't have to wipe out mankind. We can choose to not let that happen. Or not."

    That's it! I'm moving to Mars, where it's safer.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Some sobering moves. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It's not safer on Mars and you know that. The very trip might cost you your life. Mars has little atmosphere and less magnetic shield. But since these events are of low frequency, having a genome backup on Mars is not a bad thing because if Earth becomes uninhabitable for a period of time, Mars can repopulate Earth after the disaster has passed. And if the Mars colony is wiped out, vice versa. But if all our genetic eggs are in one basket, we can all suffer the same spill. That's not tricky, is it? We know the spill will happen. What we can choose is whether or not all our eggs are in it. Given interplanetary commerce, Earth and Mars could be wiped out every century, and we'd repopulate from the miners in the asteroid belt. Perhaps the race would be better for that. Or we can choose to wait here for the end of our fate - I do not like that answer.

      As for me from a Darwinian point of view I'd prefer some offspring to be on Mars and some to be on Earth and some further out so that my genetic material, diffused as it must be through the passage of time, might not be lost entirely. That's my hope for immortality: that my offspring go far and wide. You? Farm that plot, whatever it is. That'll work out fine for you and yours.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  167. Good time to start pumping out ash then! by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    There's another factor to consider. Not all ash is equal. There's lighter, smaller-grained ash which will stay up longer and travel farther. Then there's heavier, courser-grained ash that will precipitate out sooner. The ratio will determine in part how far and how long this disaster will be.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  168. 2012.. mayans... OH NO YO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ... this is my favorite. From the Sci Am article comments...

    "Jerry at 12:40 AM on 12/31/08

    I am a Geologist, and the time table for sizable activity at yellow stone is over due. With the planets gravitational forces in 2012, I feel there is a strong possibility for large techtonic activity on a scale man has never recorded. Magnetic, geothermal, large scale plates shifts, activity in the Hawiian Hot spot, major plate boundries could all be possible areas of intense geologic uplift and possibly some major rebuilding due to changes in the forces pressing and pushing constantly around the world. Mark my words, as 2012 draws near the global interest will become more accute. The amount of techtonic activity in previously dead or dormant areas will increase. With small to large scale mid atlantic riff activity, alieutian island suduction intensity, Greenland, etc. Many people around the world will be in the way of a possilbe claticlismic event like modern man has never seen."

    1. Re:2012.. mayans... OH NO YO by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      Yes, geologists in real life spell "tectonic" as "techtonic" all the time. I'm a geologistist, so I know.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    2. Re:2012.. mayans... OH NO YO by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the spelling of rift, subduction, Aleutian, and cataclysmic.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    3. Re:2012.. mayans... OH NO YO by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Subduction leads to Orogeny!

  169. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most of your message, you sounds like a libtard about ready to erupt. Then right at the end, you appear to make a valid point.

  170. You are SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drop dead you dog fucking sack of shit. Just fucking die. Cocksucking sack of pig shit. Die. Oh, and happy new year. May you not see another.

  171. Nothing to be concerned about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont worry, it wont blow until 2012...

  172. History channel by nnet · · Score: 1

    Already theorized and documented on History Channels Mega Disasters.

  173. Oplaan by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, if you think all the major nations don't have an operation plan that covers this and all plausible contingencies, you're naive. It's their job and they're good at it.

    If Russia nukes the Yellowstone valley, we nuke the Siberian Traps. If you think Global Climate Change is bad, you should see those models. They're bad .

    Nuclear submarines will be unaffected by ash, and both sides have them. Tracked vehicles traverse ash just fine. Some nations are prepared with tanks and ships in underground bunkers as well. Remember that we'll be weak with little influence from our national government for five years or more. That means that after at most four years and at least 30 days, our federal government won't have plausible authority. At that point it's every man for himself. They could nuke us then and get nuked back, but what if South America, which is nuke free, chose that moment to invade? Could we push them back with our bogged down infantry? If we wanted to wipe them out, who would we nuke?

    At that point we as individuals will choose. Will we choose rightly? I don't know. There are points of history that can't be predicted because the outcome is decided by heroes. That's what "hero" means.

    Let's hope this unpleasant contingency does not occur. But let's be prepared for it, just in case.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Oplaan by jaclu · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody want to invade an uninhabitable USA?
      If there isnt anything/anybody there it wouldnt be of any use whatsoever...

    2. Re:Oplaan by Shihar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the US is so utterly wiped out that its military can't stomp the piss out of anyone who is looking to attack, the world is over and everyone has bigger problem. A huge fraction of the US military isn't even in the US. Further, much of the US's military is still tooled up to survive a nuclear holocaust. Even if all the nuclear silos were wiped out (they wouldn't be), the nuclear subs would be utterly fine and happy to glass large sections of the Earth's surface to dissuade the apparently suicidal masses that want to enter a disaster zone so utterly inhospitable that the US can't prevent them.

      As far as a break down in command and control goes, the US military would not break down. It is at once one of the most loyal armies in the world and at the same time has one of the most flexible command structures that allows isolated units to operate effectively without command. Even if the entire civilian government was wiped out in the US (which is absurd... most people would successfully be evacuated) that would leave tens of thousands of embassy employs and hundreds of thousands civilians who were not in the US at one time or another.

      You have been watching too many end of the world movies. You could make every single person in the US drop dead and every single machine in the US stop functioning... and the US would still have more than enough military power and allies sitting around to make short work of suicidal armies looking to take over a wasteland. If the 300,000 or so soldiers stationed off of US soil couldn't do it and NATO decided that it wasn't going to live up to its treaty obligations, that would still leave a few hundred nuclear missiles to give a convincing no argument.

  174. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The *luck* of the United States recently?

    Man, I sure had bad luck being born in the United States.

    All those silly things you listed _I'm_ not personally responsible for.

    Where do you live, you lucky goose?

  175. Last! by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last Post!

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:Last! by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Them are fighting words!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Post

  176. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick any human being past or present at random back to at least the dawn of spoken language. That human alienates and disgusts 99% of the others alive at the time, just for being different. This applies to you personally, to me personally, to everyone around either of us, and to every person in Somalia, Haiti, Zimbabwe, and Burma. Shut the fuck up.

  177. Re:Quick, bail it out!-link by Saysys · · Score: 1

    Discussion of this suggestion

  178. Start monitoring quakes with your laptop by kanweg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your laptop has an acceleration sensor. It can be used to detect earthquakes.

    http://qcn-web.stanford.edu/

    Bert

  179. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ugg. The problems with the Somalis are far worse than merely not being "born into relative privilege."

  180. Mod parent up, please by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up, please. The grandparent did a nice job but blew it at the end. The numbers he was dealing with all the way through are all energy quantities (Joules) but the last solar tidbit is an energy RATE (Watts).

    1. Re:Mod parent up, please by coaxial · · Score: 1

      It's a day, which would be ~24 hours

  181. What, no blackjack or hookers? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    What kind of /. post are you playing at, AC?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  182. In the words of Comic Book Guy by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    A sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.

    1. Re:In the words of Comic Book Guy by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

      A sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.

      I'll trade you all of my guns, ammo and booze for your sarcasm detector.

      Peter

  183. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by rdnetto · · Score: 2, Funny

    The three last eruptions were 6000, 700, and 2500 times Mt St Helens 1980 (MSHE), which released 1.67 exajoules (1.673 x 10^18 Joules). According to the esteemed Christopher Thomas 1 Burning Library of Congress (BLoC) is equivalent to 4 petajoules (4 x 10^15 Joules). Converting MSHE to BLoC gives 1 MSHE = 418.25 BLoC. So the last three eruptions were 2509500 BLoC, 292775 BLoC, and 1045625 BLoC, respectively. Since we don't know how big the next eruption will be, let's just assume the mean of the last 3, and that's 1282633.3 BLoCs, or 39% of the total solar energy that strikes the surface of the Earth.

    So the energy crisis is solved? What a relief!

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  184. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the actions of the U.S. have disgusted 99% of the world, it's only because somewhere around 95% of the world is wallowing in hypocrisy. So fuck them, and fuck you.

    Thank you for reinforcing your parent poster's point and demonstrating that you don't get it.

  185. TL;DR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waaaaaay too much text.

  186. I for one welcome our new supervolcano overlords by Atrox666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least around here we know we'll always have enough virgins to throw in.

  187. Speak of the devil.. by slashmojo · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is on BBC today..

    Supervolcano

    *wearing tinfoil hat* How did they know?! ;)

  188. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Mozk · · Score: 1

    He was referencing this:

    1.5×10^22 J, the total energy from the Sun that strikes the face of the Earth each day

    --
    No existe.
  189. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by Mozk · · Score: 1

    It would be equivalent to the energy consumed by 71.3 billion average United States automobiles in the year 2000.

    --
    No existe.
  190. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The rest of the world is so nice though.

    France and Russia certainly don't produce weapons that they sell around the world. The land mines in Afghanistan weren't produced by Germany. Britain doesn't have a huge defense industry. The European Union isn't corrupt. And OPEC just wants to stabilize prices so the world is happy.

    Get real. The US just happens to be the country in the spotlight, but practically every other country is just as bad. And if you don't think so, and somehow your government is honest and loves you, then you are living in a dream world.

    Wake up. The US certainly isn't perfect. But are you (and your country) -really- any better? What is your country doing to help the people in Somali, Haitia, Zimbabwe, and Burma?

  191. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al will be speaking about the global cooling and blocked light from the sun, while the republicans will say that it is not happening and insist that nothing be done.

  192. Read more carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get that from the article posted. One says that there may be stress building on the San Andreas Fault and that's causing higher quake activity..along with the observation that quakes in one place trigger quakes in another.

    The wikipedia article describes, among other things rise and fall of the floor of the Yellowstone caldera as something that's routinely tracked, citing experts as saying that recent rises in the floor are not an indication a full-scale eruption is due to happen...stating that more dangerous to people are hydrodynamic explosions (steam explosions) on a smaller scale.

    Me, I'm much more concerned with the way that global warming is correlated to the drop in the number of pirates world round.

  193. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by makomk · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...and the Americans' charming habit of bombing things like wedding parties isn't backfiring. At all. The Pakistanis living in those areas don't mind the US screwing up and killing innocent civilians, women, and children, even wiping out entire extended families, because they're doing it to prevent terrorism, and they understand that's more important than little things like a few dead Pakistanis. There's no way this could increase support for the terrorists.

    (That was sarcasm, by the way.)

  194. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    Obama Republican. I really hope he doesn't suck.

    Hehe, I was a staunch Democrat until I started hanging out on Dailykos and saw just how scary some of those fuckers are. Now I'm applying for my pistol permit and earnestly hoping that Obama is as pragmatic as I think he is and governs from the center.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  195. Only one thing to say. by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    "Thanks for all the fish."

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  196. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Shakrai · · Score: 0

    You elect an imbecile to the most powerful office in the world. Twice.

    The United States doesn't exactly have a monopoly on electing idiots. You do know that he who shall not be named gained power democratically, right? GWB is an imbecile -- but he isn't a genocidal nutjob who came to power after blaming an unpopular minority for all of our problems.

    You spend/borrow your way into a financial crisis.

    The financial crisis had less to do with borrowing (although that played a part) and more to do with the real estate bubble. When that bubble burst it unbalanced the books of all the institutions that had money invested in the mortgage market. In any case our national debt is smaller than Japan's when looked at vs. GDP. Why aren't you blaming them for the economic crisis?

    bombings inside Pakistan

    Maybe that has something to do with that region of Pakistan harboring the people who murdered almost 3,000 Americans?

    Kyoto

    Kyoto is a flawed treaty. It will cripple the economy of the developed World while giving a license to pollute to the developing World (China/India). Why the hell should we cripple our economy if they aren't going to be on board with solving the problem?

    You remove more and more of the basic rights of your own citizens.

    Citation?

    count your fucking blessings

    I count my blessings every day that I was born in the greatest country on Earth. I wouldn't want to live anywhere else.

    and shut the fuck up

    You got a +5 insightful for "shut the fuck up"? Guess the anti-American folks have the mod points today.

    Try living just one day as an average Somali, Haitian, Zimbabwean, or Burmese.

    So which one of those countries are you posting from?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  197. Drop in the bucket by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Powering the entire US for a few decades might use all of 1% or so of the energy down there.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  198. I blame Obama by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    After all, he didn't even MENTION extinction level event planning in his campaign.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  199. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    habit of bombing things like wedding parties

    Really? A habit of it?

    So, we can use your definition of "habit" to also say that Pakistanis have a habit of murdering school teachers for teaching, a habit of blinding women with battery acid for having the audacity to turn down a the sexual advances of an old man who already has three other wives? Ah yes, the Pakistani Habit of sending religious zealots into other countries where they take over villages by force and then march women into what used to be soccer fields and shoot them in the head at lunch time in front of a crowd for... teaching their daughters to read?

    What? Those aren't reasonable descriptions of the "habits" of all Pakistanis?

    Do you suppose that any Pakistani military operation (say, in the middle of shooting people while arguing over who owns Kasmir, for example) has ever involved the death of anyone other than their intended targets? Ah, so Pakistanis are in the habit of killing innocent people? Or is it that you're just in the habit of being a breathless troll with no perspective whatsoever?

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  200. Great by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    You think the Crab People are pissed now? Just wait until you tap into their giant steamer.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  201. Reassurance failed... by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

    ..when I saw your sig, somehow all the reassurance in the world just comes unstuck for some strange reason.... :/

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  202. Not all that bad by Squeeonline · · Score: 0

    "plunge global temperatures,"
    Atleast we wont have to worry about Global Warming and listen to Al Gore go on about it.
    Think positive people!

  203. What the fuck? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Has /. turned into the Weekly World News, or the Enquirer or something? This "lets' be as sensationalistic as possible with absolutely no proof or cause" shit is getting old.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  204. Wyoming scale? by toppromulan · · Score: 1

    540 million tons is already a half a billion. 1000 times it would be a half a trillion.

  205. "about to" by speedtux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On geologic time scales, "about to" could be 5000 years in the future.

  206. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    The Might Makes Right Association.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  207. Excuse me, Miss.... by skadork · · Score: 0

    I don't want to die a virgin....

    --
    doug
    -a.thought.crushed.my.mind-
  208. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    Where's the Divine Beano when we REALLY need it ???

  209. Well, the US isn't clearly referred to in Revelati by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    So maybe so, eh? I would still make it out to be less likely than getting hit with asteroid Apophis in 2038.

  210. Who's being offensive here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your statement is incredibly offensive. I don't have any money of significance, but if my mayor begged me to leave the city, I would grab those possessions I care about the most (my old computer and a few other things), a tent and a bicycle and move it. Your suggestion that I can't take responsible action just because I'm poor is so insensitive that I can't find words for it.

  211. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >...the US Financial credit market and the Housing Bubble wouldn't burst at the same time- they calculated that was a once in 75 million years event.

    So, how many other times in the last 75 million years have they both burst? ;-)

  212. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by khallow · · Score: 1

    Mt. Mazama is a different kind of volcano. There the volcano builds a mountain out of unstable layers of lava and ash flows. We have an example of it in the smaller Mt. St. Helens eruption which I think is fairly close to a caldera eruption (ie, a considerable portion of the energy of the eruption probably came from the fall of the top of the mountain). There a landslide or spurt of volcanic activity can trigger the release of pressure needed for a caldera collapse.

    Yellowstone is far larger in scale, has no central cone or slope gradient, and hasn't erupted in 70,000 years. That last point is important. It doesn't erupt on a regular basis. It's possible, for example, that after all this time any eruption will escalate to a caldera eruption.

  213. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The models were not to blame for the financial crisis. The analysts at those firms ever believed them in the first place. You've been reading too much Taleb. The whole argument is a strawman.

  214. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by khallow · · Score: 1

    Whine. Whine. Whine. And here I thought the Obama election would immunize us against this sort of stupidity. So why is the US required to be considerably smarter, less hypocrtical, and more popular than anyone else? Why shouldn't the US pursue its interests? Every other country does.

  215. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A divine new year's eve firecracker...

  216. In Unrelated News ... by TechnicalPenguin · · Score: 2, Funny

    the seismologists studying this earthquake activity all mysteriously resigned and moved to Africa.

    1. Re:In Unrelated News ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the seismologists studying this earthquake activity all mysteriously resigned and moved to Africa.

      What would be in the least bit mysterious about that? That would be as mysterious as a geologist living at 80-several metres above sea level (around 10 m above the approximate wash level of the Haltenbanke Tsunami) on a 1:7 slope (meaning that rainfall runs away and floods some other poor schmuck), in an area that has never been subject to mining (and hence has no mining-related subsidence) and hasn't got enough slope to generate its own solifluction movements. That's as mysterious as the stable boy making a nice profit by betting on the horses that he's training. That's as mysterious as a not very mysterious thing.

      If I were a seismologist, I'd be keeping a weather eye on this little lot. I don't see any particular advantage to moving to Africa though - too many people. I've already declined to post my destination, if this gets more "interesting".

      mind you, one of my class mates from University did his PhD in seismology ; I might try to find an email address for him, check out where he's living these days. Worth knowing that.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    2. Re:In Unrelated News ... by onfiregirl · · Score: 1

      the seismologists studying this earthquake activity all mysteriously resigned and moved to Africa.

      What would be in the least bit mysterious about that? That would be as mysterious as a geologist living at 80-several metres above sea level (around 10 m above the approximate wash level of the Haltenbanke Tsunami) on a 1:7 slope (meaning that rainfall runs away and floods some other poor schmuck), in an area that has never been subject to mining (and hence has no mining-related subsidence) and hasn't got enough slope to generate its own solifluction movements. That's as mysterious as the stable boy making a nice profit by betting on the horses that he's training. That's as mysterious as a not very mysterious thing.

      If I were a seismologist, I'd be keeping a weather eye on this little lot. I don't see any particular advantage to moving to Africa though - too many people. I've already declined to post my destination, if this gets more "interesting".

      mind you, one of my class mates from University did his PhD in seismology ; I might try to find an email address for him, check out where he's living these days. Worth knowing that.

      question if yellowstone blew her top what are the chances of a chain reaction lets say in long valley california ?

    3. Re:In Unrelated News ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      question if yellowstone blew her top what are the chances of a chain reaction lets say in long valley california ?

      Google Maps is blocked at my present location, so I have to rely on memory : Long Valley California is that little chunk of California that is East of the Sierra Nevada and tucked into the corner between Nevada and (ummm) Oregon(?) ; ISTR there being releatively recent volcanism there, and minor earthquake activity (minor compared to the rest of California) ? That where we're talking about?

      Earthquake-wise - non-trivial chance of some secondarily-spawned activity, but it's unlikely to be severe. You're a good distance in from the big transcurrent faults near the coast.

      Ash fall would be a much more severe problem - you're near the margins of the Hucklebury tuff in pre-historic times.

      Direct blast or eruption effects? Negligible ; barely different from the baseline hazard of living on Earth, in the cosmic bowling alley that is the inner Solar System.

      I'm not quite sure what you mean by a "chain reaction" ; unless there's a connected set of highly-stressed faults, plugged caldera etc from Jellystone to your locale, then there's not a chain per se ; there's a theoretical prospect that the shaking from one major quake can loosen faults that are in the area and are ready to pop, but in practice that needs all the faults to be so close to going already that they do go spontaneously. People have been looking through the records for evidence of such correlations for at least a decade (that I've been paying attention to the subject), and the published claims for such a correlation are at best weak and certainly don't convince all seismologists. I'm not a seismologist, so I'll wait until the experts are convinced one way or the other that such an effect has been demonstrated. But it's certain that any such effect is weak and inconsistent at it's strongest. Most likely, it's too weak to be reliably measured, so you're as well off estimating your risk from a random variation model as from trying to apply a sophisticated model that accounts for the likelihood of an eruption at Jellystone.

      Short version : living anywhere in California puts you at elevated risk of earthquake, and therefore at elevated insurance premiums. In the NE corner of the state, you'll have a small additional risk (or premium) from ashfall damage.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  217. Relax everyone, the Germans will survive by vorlich · · Score: 2, Funny

    and immediately restore all of civilisation, just like they did after the fall of Rome, only much quicker this time and the quality will be so much higher and it will be ten times more efficient...

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  218. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the level of a society, behavior dictates prosperity, not "birth into privilege".

    For example, Argentina was among the five wealthiest countries in the world in 1923. Taiwan was an impoverished, exploited, and oppressed imperial holding of the Japanese Empire at that time, and for the next two decades. Argentina also has significantly superior natural resources. And yet, by 1983 . . .

  219. new year Resolution by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I no longer reply to those that are too chicken shit to be logged in.

    1. Re:new year Resolution by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 1

      I no longer reply to those that are too chicken shit to be logged in.

      Bush is probably one of the worst presidents, rivaling even Hoover. I'm not the guy who replied to you, but I'll give it a shot with my own (more constructive) reply:
      -Why, exactly, do I owe Bush "for keep us safe"?
      -What "crisises" has he kept from "going realy bad"?

  220. Which will keep you alive for what? by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll travel to meet up with some hunter friends of mine who have guns and wilderness survival skills... we'll shoot you and your newly found progressive buddies, eat your vegetables, and have a long pig BBQ

    Six weeks, six months?

    Guns need powder and ammunition. Lubricating oils. Spare parts.

    Although nice firearms aren't needed for game. Besides using firearms I've also hunt with bow and arrows and have trapped wildlife. Though I don't like fish I have woven nets that can be used to fish.

    Game becomes hard to find. Edible plants, fruits, nut and berries become hard to find.

    Now that depends on the location and population. Even though I live in a major metro area in the north, the Twin Cities of Minneapolis/St Paul, on the postage stamp sized lot where I live I can grow 10% of my own food food easily in my garden. Though I started my carrots and radishes late this year, I had enough lettuce and cherry or grape tomatoes for salad every day for a month. I had enough tomatillos for one soup, or salsa, a week for months. There was enough rhubarb for a few sticks a week as well. This spring I'll add blue berries and strawberries. And maybe potatoes and corn. This past growing season I got a bunch of remarks about how well my garden grew and was asked a number of tymes how I was able to grow my plants as big as they did grow. A few said they wanted me to help them on their garden next year. And my growing season is short.

    And that's just where I live now. When I lived in Florida I was able to grow enough food for most of the year in my mother's backyard. Preserving food, canning, drying or dehydrating, smoking, and using other methods of preserving food allows the food supply to last longer. I mention each of these because I have done all of them, and have lived in survival situations.

    Falcon

    1. Re:Which will keep you alive for what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sere?

  221. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by dentin · · Score: 1

    Just to be clear, one kilogram of energy is 9e16 joules, which IIRC is considered approximately the equivalent amount of energy released by a 25 megaton nuclear bomb.

    1.67 exajoules is only about 20 times this, or in short the equivalent of 20 bikini atoll blasts, or 10 kilos of antimatter. Yes, it will be irritating in terms of the amount of ash lifted, but in terms of raw explosive force it's not that big a deal.

    That said, 1.67 exajoules seems a bit low. Are you sure that's the right number?

    --
    Alter Aeon Multiclass MUD - http://www.alteraeon.com
  222. vallyspeek? by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    Somehow, the message got through anyway.

  223. food for survival by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Food enough to feed a few hundred thousand people - though, that's still about 0.016% chance, or so.

    So yeah, to survive you need to kill a hundred people.

    However most of those people are in cities not where the food is. And if those people want to survive then they're going to need people who can grow food.

    Falcon

    1. Re:food for survival by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Anyone can farm, not like it's hard.

      Especially not in comparison to those circumstances. Farming will be dangerous, but still not hard.

      What's hard? Keeping up with the modern regulations and pesticides. The techniques haven't really changed that much.

  224. Why would anybody want to invade an uninhabitable by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    USA?

    Actually all that volcanic ash could make the US even more productive agriculturally. Volcanic ash can significantly improve soil fertility and quality.

    Falcon

  225. NEW YEAR NEW DRAMA by AmigaMMC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Happy New Year first of all (let's be polite) :) I live one hour from Yellowstone Lake, which is the center of the latest supervulcanic explosion caldera. I haven't felt any tremors and neither have anyone of the residents here. I have worked in Yellowstone and (as anyone visiting the Old Faithful Visitor Center can see from the seismographer there) Yellowstone has hundreds of micro earthquakes every day. On the other hand, Yellowstone's supervolcano has gone off every 600,000 years or so and the last eruption happened... well... about 600,000 years ago. So, geologically speaking it's time. Will it be 2009? I doubt it. And to prove it to you next summer I'll go scuba diving Yellowstone Lake like many people do.

    1. Re:NEW YEAR NEW DRAMA by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

      BTW, My Zune is working again. Nostradamus was wrong :)

  226. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by khallow · · Score: 1

    The earthquakes are along the edge of one of three known magma bodies, the one that is slowly obstructing the mouth of Yellowstone Lake. The other two are around Mallard Lake and Norris Geyser Basin.

  227. Hello? Yes, this is fucking dangerous by tnk1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, I'm seeing two general threads here:

    % People who are stupidly calling something like this the end of the world

    % People who are stupidly downplaying the threat

    This will not be the end of the world. It wasn't the end of life on the planet the last time it happened. We know this.

    Now that we got that out of the way, let's be clear here. People seem to think that 35cm of ash is like snow, and that they can handle 35 cm of snow. Here's a hint. Snow eventually melts and is taken back up into the atmosphere or is absorbed into the ground. Water is part of the standard climate cycles we deal with every day.

    Ash is not water. Ash does not melt. Ash is fine particles of non-organic solids. If it ends up on your roof, it does not melt off the top of your house, it collapses your roof. Once it is on the ground, it makes a big pile of crap, and then stays there, forever. When you try and plow it or whatever, it will end up in your lungs and choke you.

    Pyroclastic flows, magma and all the rest will simply eliminate 13 states. Those 13 states probably produce most of the food in the United States. Even if you evacuate, food supplies would probably be completely exhausted in a few weeks.

    After an eruption in the early 1800's we had what was called The Year Without a Summer. Crops failed, people really did starve, and this was just a rather big explosion of a relatively normal volcano. Yellowstone, should it blow, will likely completely eliminate organized agriculture except (if we are incredibly lucky) in the most optimum of places. Those places will might produce food, but not enough for 6-7 billion people. And even if those people were likely to want to export food that they don't have, there would cease to be a transportation infrastructure capable of feeding people across the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans.

    Most people will die. When they die they will rot. When they rot there will be disease. We'd probably be better off resorting to cannibalism so that we can at least do something with matter that will otherwise breed plague.

    There is a saying that we are 24 hours from barbarism at all times. This is true. Even if people do the unexpected and all pitch in to rationally help one another, the infrastructure for most modern civilization will likely be untenable in most of North America and quite possibly elsewhere. There is no modern society without energy sources and the means to get it where it needs to go.

    People will survive, but those people who believe that the advances of modern society will soften the blow appreciably fail to understand that our advances have taken most people farther away from the skills that they need to survive, rather than made them safer from this sort of threat. Our technology level could be helpful, but no one has really used it to protect against this sort of threat, and therefore, we would be reduced to what still would work when we get sucker punched by this.

    If you point at other lesser volcanic eruptions as proof that its not so bad, you fail to comprehend the scale of the threat. These eruptions are survivable precisely because they are localized. They only remove a little infrastructure locally, but only a few miles away, everyone is fine. An explosion of this magnitude can affect ALL of the infrastructure at the same time, within a very brief amount of time. It is quite simply the same thing as if we launched all of our nuclear weapons at one another at the same time, minus the radiation.

    It is bad, mmkay?

    Happily, nothing is exploding anytime soon. These fools are just trying to make a buck with some good old fashion alarmist journalism. But, let's be very, very clear. If this did happen, you need to put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye unless Jesus loves you and you get taken up in the Rapture. Otherwise, you're dead meat.

  228. bombings inside Pakistan by falconwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe that has something to do with that region of Pakistan harboring the people who murdered almost 3,000 Americans?

    Using that line of reasoning, is it reasoning?, the US should then be attacking Saudi Arabia. Most of the 911 hijackers were Saudis.

    Kyoto is a flawed treaty. It will cripple the economy of the developed World while giving a license to pollute to the developing World (China/India). Why the hell should we cripple our economy if they aren't going to be on board with solving the problem?

    Though I didn't want to see a President Gross, er Gore, I voted against Bush by selecting Gore on the ballot because of Kyoto. Having said that, after President Bush came out against Kyoto something he said provoked me to do some research. I didn't know it before but Kyoto did not have limits on GHG (Greenhouse Gas) emissions on either China or India. And both countries are building a lot of coal fired power plants. So from one perspective Bush was right, however he still could have encouraged or pushed businesses to cut emissions and develop renewable energy sources. What does he do? He instead tries to relax emission regulations, so power plants can emit more pollution.

    You remove more and more of the basic rights of your own citizens.

    Citation?

    Warrentless wiretaps and searches as well as the PATRIOT Act.

    Falcon

  229. Plan Z: by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

    Plan Z: Faced with a cataclysmic event that would threaten to wipe out civilisation, the Government nukes its own population centres.

  230. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the derivative of an imaginary-valued function be itself imaginary?

  231. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    I have posted from Moscow, Mexico City, Barbados and Ciudad Juárez. Not exactly the best, and not exactly the worst. But some pretty scary shit never the less.

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  232. 1973 is calling by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    No, Al Gore won't STFU - He will just go and dig up the Global Cooling scripts from 35 years ago.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  233. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our models of vulcanism are incompletely understood

    We just need to think more logically.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan_(mythology)

  234. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by LaurensVH · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I can recommend The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable to anyone. It's a great book, and written before the current financial and economical crisis. I'm not going to say he predicted it accurately, but reading it again knowing all this has significantly changed my opinion on the book. http://www.amazon.com/Black-Swan-Impact-Highly-Improbable/dp/1400063515 Read it -- you won't regret it.

  235. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by coaxial · · Score: 1

    That said, 1.67 exajoules seems a bit low. Are you sure that's the right number?

    I got the number from Wikipedia, which apparently converted it from this article.

  236. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by coaxial · · Score: 1

    It's a day. The link cites Wikipedia.

  237. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by makomk · · Score: 1

    So, we can use your definition of "habit" to also say that Pakistanis have a habit of murdering school teachers for teaching, a habit of blinding women with battery acid for having the audacity to turn down a the sexual advances of an old man who already has three other wives? Ah yes, the Pakistani Habit of sending religious zealots into other countries where they take over villages by force and then march women into what used to be soccer fields and shoot them in the head at lunch time in front of a crowd for... teaching their daughters to read?

    A lot of Americans do believe that all Pakistanis are like this, and I have a feeling you might be one of them. For example, take the comment I replied to.

    But yes, technically I should've said the American *army's* charming habit of bombing things like wedding parties. You can bet the Pakistanis in question won't make that distinction, though - their only interaction with Americans is when their friends and family are being killed by US bombing raids. Also, remember that all the US bombing of Pakistanis was done by US soldiers and authorised by the US president himself - who the US population at large re-elected largely because of his strong decisive military action - so the US population bears some responsibility. You can compare the two when the Pakistani government starts murdering school teachers, blinding women with battery acid, etc.

    Do you suppose that any Pakistani military operation (say, in the middle of shooting people while arguing over who owns Kasmir, for example) has ever involved the death of anyone other than their intended targets? Ah, so Pakistanis are in the habit of killing innocent people? Or is it that you're just in the habit of being a breathless troll with no perspective whatsoever?

    I'm sure they have, and look how well that war's working out. I mean, India and Pakistan have managed to refrain from nuking each other into radioactive wastelands so far, but that's about the best you can say.

  238. You are wrong. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is widely documented that during natural disasters people organize themselves and help each other.

    Some people in the US have an irrational love of guns, violence and oppression as a way to confront any major crisis.

    In most situations what is required is human kindness and good organizational skills.

    The brutes that will try to go hunting and make themselves strong, will not be allowed back in the village and will be left to rot psychologically by being ignored by the rest of the new community. Or will be organized by the clever people (i.e. politicians) as they had always been.

    People with a gun just become the tool of somebody else's bidding.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  239. You just don't get it. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    IN a volcanic eruption of the one we are talking about you will have no sunlight for several months and most sources of water would be contaminated.

    Only people in the other side of the world would have any realistic chance to make it on their own, pretty much everybody else would be doomed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:You just don't get it. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      IN a volcanic eruption of the one we are talking about you will have no sunlight for several months

      Ah, modern technology. Crops can be grown in greenhouses with grow lights powered by geothermal, hydro, or wind power.

      and most sources of water would be contaminated.

      These greenhouses can also help provide filtered water. And while new technology may provide some answers so can old tech. Pottery can and is used to purify water. Local potters could have a good business making pottery. Here's an abstract of a study on the effectiveness of ceramic filters from the University of Southampton. I didn't find the article I had a few years ago but here's Google's results for pottery water filters africa, a number of people in Africa started businesses making pottery to filter water. References like these can be found throughout the world.

      Only people in the other side of the world would have any realistic chance to make it on their own

      Who says people have to make it on their own? People form communities because it helps them and because they are social animals.

      Falcon

  240. Is that same great army ..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... the one bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq?

    You write all that bullshit and one wonders in which planet it is actually true.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Is that same great army ..... by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the one that kicked over two successive governments in under a month while making a decent attempt at refraining from using even a fraction of its power to keep down civilian casualties. Yeah, that same one could pretty easily wipe out all other enemies attempting to invade friendly territory. Bonus points if they are given the thumbs up to pop off nukes and start glassing pieces of the earth's surface.

      The US army's ability to crush opposing military forces is unquestionable and unmatched. Iraq had the fourth largest military in the world. The US went half way around the world and wiped it out. During the second Iraq war the Iraqi military didn't even get around to surrendering. They were so devastated by the US attack that instead of surrendering, it simply evaporated... and that was the US military showing restraint and worrying over things like civilian casualties.

      Now, imagine a fight for the homeland, on friendly territory, and with supply lines that don't stretch across the globe. The idea that anyone could invade the US, even if it was utterly devastated, is absurd.

      If you want to beat the US, fight an unconventional war, blow up civilian, hide among friendly civilians, and whatever you do, do not put on a uniform. Do this, and wait it out until the US populace gets board and leaves after a trivial number of casualties. The US has lots more people in a single day of fighting during World War II than in the entire Afghanistan conflict. The US has lots more people on a one square mile hunk of rock in the Pacific than both the Iraq wars and Afghanistan war's put together. The US didn't get beaten, it got board and the electorate declared it was tired of spending money building neo-con dreams... and even then, the US is going to leave Iraq with a quasi functional government that is not exactly great but (pardon the expression) good enough for government work.

      If on the other hand you want to get the piss beat out of you, put on a uniform, try a stand up fight against the US army, and then for a real good laugh try fighting amongst heavily armed civilian population of the US and see how that works out for you.

      Pointing out that Americans get bored with insurgent wars after trivial losses in hostile shit hole nations that they don't care about and nagging their politicians to say "fuck it, I'm out" and extrapolating that to mean that trying a stand up fight to occupy the US homeland is a winning proposition takes a pretty impressive leap of self delusion.

  241. Yeah sure. You alone against the world. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The people that will survive will be the ones that organize themselves first.

    They will dispose of the loonies that decided to go on their own in the purest survivalist of styles.

    Humans thrive when they cooperate with each other. There is no example of humans surviving on their own for any long periods of time, no matter how skilful, and in any case an isolated individual is a failure from a very biological reproductive point of view.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  242. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

    ...still believe that when an event that the models say is a once-in-a-hundred-years event happens three times in six months, it's not an indication of a basic flaw in the model, but rather a rare fluke that means it's now statistically certain it'll NEVER happen again.

    So if I flip a coin three times and it comes up tails each time, it will almost certainly come up heads the next time!

    You have to find me some of these people so we can start making bets...

  243. The organized will live. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Organization gives strength.

    Isolate and perish. It is that simple.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  244. Have you lived under an eruption? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I had. A small one close to a smallish volcano.

    You simply have no idea what you are talking about.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  245. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by CFTM · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't think you could pay me enough money to go to Ciudad Juarez :(

    As a resident of Los Angeles, reading about the tragedy's occurring south of the border and how the war on drugs has spiraled out of control is quite disheartening.

  246. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by dentin · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia should be modified. Did not the words "Institute for Creation Research" not give it away? These are the same guys that did the 'science' for the creation museum in Ohio - the museum with adam and eve walking in the garden of eden side by side with vegetarian velociraptors.

    The ICR is a known fraudulent non-scientific organization. All information in that article should be considered bogus until confirmed by reputable sources.

    That said, I still think 1.67 exajoules is too low. We're talking about moving around on the order of a thousand cubic miles of rock here, where each cubic mile is around 1.5e13 kilograms. Just by this rough calculation, I get 1.67e18 / 1.5e16 which is about one hundred joules per kilo, or enough energy to raise/lower the landmass by about ten meters. Most of the stuff I've read indicates a caldera shift much larger than that, never mind the lava flows and other expunged material.

    --
    Alter Aeon Multiclass MUD - http://www.alteraeon.com
  247. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Unix+Ronin · · Score: 1

    Not so much with the coin flip ... it's more closely related to the idea of taking a bomb with you whenever you fly, on the grounds that the odds against there being TWO bombs on a single flight are completely astronomical.

    (Side note: Richard Feynman once remarked that the use of "astronomical" to describe absurdly large numbers was really rather outdated, astronomical constants being pretty well defined by now, and that with the increasing absurdity of the numbers being casually tossed around in the financial sector we should instead speak of absurdly large, ill-defined numbers as economical. I think recent events have driven his point soundly home.)

  248. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Three in 2008 alone.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  249. Re:Your link doesn't seem to support your contenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mt. Mazama's cataclysmic eruption wasn't triggered by a landslide, at least to the degree that geologic evidence was preserved (and it was preserved remarkably well given the scale of the eruption).

    Mazama and Yellowstone are, of course, dramatically different, but in some critical ways they may be comparable. Both have a highly fractionated relatively shallow magma chambers heated by, and capping, a source of more basic magma.

    In Mazama's case the rate of magma emplacement is much lower, and it's a result of subduction combined with significant structural controls. It also developed a very significant edifice, in contrast to Yellowstone. For its part, Yellowstone is the result of a "hotspot" (pick your cause: anomaly related to feedback involving upper mantle convection, mantle plume, etc...) not immediately related to subduction. Mazama is a reasonably long-lived feature but not exceptionally so; the Yellowstone hotspot, as evidenced by its track across Idaho, is probably thirty times older, but activity at its present location is only a couple times older than Mazama.

    Differences aside, I suspect that very large caldera forming eruptions share certain similarities with some smaller caldera forming eruptions such as Mazama's. At some point in the process of an eruption some critical threshold is exceeded, the surface can no longer be supported, collapse and ring faulting are initiated, and the process becomes self reinforcing until the magma chamber is emptied.

    Unfortunately this is outside my area of expertise so I can only make broad brush-comparisons. I'll try to read up on the current literature.

  250. Re:Two multiple hundreds of thousands of years eve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... yeah... because noone predicted this at all. Ever. It required an Act Of God to defeat our sound financial planners & economists, to end the circle of exploitation that our politicians have ensured for half a century.

    Right.

  251. I'm betting on. . . by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

    . . .the New Madrid Fault

    --
    "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
  252. No dying today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cluster seems to have flatlined on all the monitoring stations!!

    http://www.quake.utah.edu/helicorder/heli/yellowstone/index.html

    still think sucking energy out of it kinda proactively now seems like a good idea...
    woot

  253. I think... by inspiringmind · · Score: 1

    I am glad I moved from Wyoming to Ohio. I have to agree with some about the human race surviving something like this. 75,000 years ago people survived and they had nothing in the way of the technology that we have today. We would adapt. We would start growing food indoors. The US has a stockpile of food that would get us by.

  254. Here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  255. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by coaxial · · Score: 1

    Good catch! I didn't even pay any attention to where it linked to! I was more concerned that the source page didn't actually list the joule estimate. USGS lists "24 megatons thermal energy (7 by blast, rest through release of heat)" which is 1.00416e+17, which is actually less than than the ICR estimate.

    That said, I'll take the USGS estimate over some random dude's uninformed opinion. Especially since you grossly overestimated estimate the volume involved. Only .67 cubic miles was actually moved via the landslide, with .046 cubic miles of lateral blast, .26 cubic miles of ash, and .029 cubic miles of lava.

  256. Re:"would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental by dentin · · Score: 1

    I just reread now and understand the discrepancy: I missed the part about 1.67 exajoules being for the St. Helens eruption; I thought that number was for an estimated 'supervolcano' detonation in Yellowstone. For St. Helens, that number doesn't sound terribly far off, though I would have thought a little high.

    That said, I'm definitely uninformed. I basically just took some of the supervolcano numbers off other pages (specifically 40 mile diameter caldera and one mile depth) and did a back-of-the envelope calculation. It was meant to be a quick sanity check only; thanks for catching it.

    --
    Alter Aeon Multiclass MUD - http://www.alteraeon.com
  257. food and firearms by falconwolf · · Score: 1
    If you have guns and ammo, you can get food and water. The opposite is not true.

    The opposite IS true, I can grow my own food without guns or ammo.

    On the other hand, you cannot defend same without guns and ammo.

    Sure I can. I know how to make traps and trapped animals as a teen. And unless the person has antibiotics they won't live long once they step in an Apache foot trap dipped in human feces. In the army my MOS, Military Occupation Speciality, was 11B, infantry, and I loved setting up booby traps. Though it's been years I used to practice archery and would like to learn to make bows and arrows. I would also like to learn metallurgy and make blade weapons. Prior to moving years ago I was a member of the local kingdom of the Society of Creative Anachronism where I lived.

    Even if I couldn't do these things though I could make arrangements with people who could provide defense in exchange for food. Besides if all a person knows is how to shoot once their firearm is inoperable or they're out of ammo, they're out of food too. There are no tools I can't make myself that I need to grow food or trap animals. On top of that, I could fast, go without eating food. I used to be in the natural and health food scene and for health reasons I'd fast occasionally, anywhere from days to weeks. How much strength would many people have after not eating for two or three weeks? Even those weeks I did fast I still rode my bike 200+ miles a week. I admit all this is unusual but for as long as I can recall I've tried to be self-sufficient. Actually now, I'd rather be dead than continue living as I have the past years.

    Falcon

    1. Re:food and firearms by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      If you have guns and ammo, you can get food and water. The opposite is not true.

      The opposite IS true, I can grow my own food without guns or ammo.

      On the other hand, you cannot defend same without guns and ammo.

      Sure I can. I know how to make traps and trapped animals as a teen. And unless the person has antibiotics they won't live long once they step in an Apache foot trap dipped in human feces. In the army my MOS, Military Occupation Speciality, was 11B, infantry, and I loved setting up booby traps. Though it's been years I used to practice archery and would like to learn to make bows and arrows. I would also like to learn metallurgy and make blade weapons. Prior to moving years ago I was a member of the local kingdom of the Society of Creative Anachronism where I lived.

      Even if I couldn't do these things though I could make arrangements with people who could provide defense in exchange for food. Besides if all a person knows is how to shoot once their firearm is inoperable or they're out of ammo, they're out of food too. There are no tools I can't make myself that I need to grow food or trap animals. On top of that, I could fast, go without eating food. I used to be in the natural and health food scene and for health reasons I'd fast occasionally, anywhere from days to weeks. How much strength would many people have after not eating for two or three weeks? Even those weeks I did fast I still rode my bike 200+ miles a week. I admit all this is unusual but for as long as I can recall I've tried to be self-sufficient. Actually now, I'd rather be dead than continue living as I have the past years.

      Falcon

      What you're saying remains true so long as those who are attacking you are either small in number, or not particularly persistent. You are correct that an infected wound, caused by a trap, will kill without antibiotics. However, that may not immediately incapacitate them. They may still retain the ability to attack. In short, a defender without firearms will likely be defeated by attackers with firearms. If not in the first encounter, it will happen soon there after.

      As to the assertion that a person who only knows how to shoot will run out of food when they run out of ammo, all things being equal you are correct. Thus, firearms and ammo are not a survival strategy by themselves. They do on the other hand greatly enhance one's ability to survive and to retain the other supplies they have stockpiled or are actively producing.

      In short, depending on the particular survival profile, firearms should primarily be used for defense, as you are correct that traps and gardens are more efficient at food procurement. That defense angle should not be underestimated.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    2. Re:food and firearms by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      You are correct that an infected wound, caused by a trap, will kill without antibiotics. However, that may not immediately incapacitate them.

      An Apache Foot Trap will incapacitate most people. Look at the graphic, many people when they take a step and their foot goes down further than they expected will automatically jerk it up again or they'll trip. Either way those pointy stakes will incapacitate them. And that's only one potential trap. While in the US Army a few of us loved setting up booby traps, usually they'd set off a flash-bang. What I liked to do was to take the casing from a rifle grenade, M203, and fill it with gunpower then tape a flash-bang to it. C4 could have been used as well, or other explosives.

      Falcon

  258. Anyone can farm, not like it's hard. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    If farming is so easy why are so many people starving? If they could farm they could grow their own food. Fact is is not everyone can garden never mind farm. After looking at my garden this past summer a number of people asked me to help them start their own gardens next year, and I now have brown if not black thumbs when it comes to growing plants. Among other things I lost my green thumb for gardening after an accident.

    Most people, in the modern world, don't know what's edible in the wild either. Growing up in the "woods" I learned what was and wasn't edible around where I lived. For instance I used to eat pine cone nuts, seeds from pine trees growing in my backyard. When I shop in Asian food stores, I love cooking also, pine cone nuts are sold there as delicacies. Or palmettoes, the stalks can help a person stay hydrated. As can cacti.

    Falcon

  259. Yes, Something is wrong at Yellowstone! by wjcormier · · Score: 1

    The government is definitely keeping information away from the public in regard the activity at Yellowstone National Park. Read "CNN Oversimplifies The Danger of Yellowstone National Park" http://justanothercoverup.com/?p=314 . This article literally traveled "around the world" and is still being read today - many times per day. To those of us who have been following these events, we know that something is brewing, especially considering that Yellowstone is over 45,000 years overdue for a major eruption, which is an "extinction level event." CNN tried initially to categorize Yellowstone as an "ancient Volcano", when in fact it is the only known "super volcano" on earth. It's also interesting that since this phenomena began, we can directly correlate the beginning of unparalleled corporate greed and the wealthy who are now engaged in building huge underground facilities that have for the most part been accomplished under secrecy so as not to alarm the rest of the population. Also note the President's purchase of land in South America atop the world's largest aquifer. You can't use "Google Images" to see the construction - as it's blacked-out with older images, but it's there, and there has to be a reason for it. Keep in mind that the ground has swelled more in the past three (3) years than it has in the past hundred years - a fact which has to be significant and demonstrates that the Yellowstone caldera is more active now than at any other time in our recorded history. When CNN attempts to pass-off such a blatant lie, we know they are hiding something, and you can bet the wealthy and those who have access to information we don't are hastily attempting to gather the funds to protect themselves at anyone's expense - including theft and murder on a scale that so far has been unparalleled in history. We need answers - but they won't be forthcoming. I predicted a major volcanic/seismologic event before the end of the year for the west coast or Alaska, as well as noting that the earthquakes were moving up from South America to the US. I wasn't disappointed: "Eruption of 3 volcanoes has scientists asking questions" http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/551521.html "How likely is it that three neighboring volcanoes would all erupt at the same time -- as the Kasatochi, Okmok and Cleveland volcanoes in the Aleutians did this summer? About as likely as a storm that only appears once in a thousand years, says Anchorage volcanologist Peter Cervelli, who'll deliver a paper on the subject this winter to the American Geophysical Union. In other words, seldom enough that Cervelli is now exploring the question of whether Alaska's triple eruption was only a coincidence involving three independent volcanoes or whether it was triggered by some common mechanism." On January 18th, 2008, I wrote "Volcanic Activity Appears To Be Working Itâ(TM)s Way Around The âoeRing of Fireâ UPDATED" http://justanothercoverup.com/?p=385 On May 6th, 2008, a Chilean volcano erupted that had been dormant for over 9,000 years. Is that a coincidence? "Thousands flee as Chilean volcano erupts" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/chile/1924533/Thousands-flee-as-Chaiten-volcano-erupts-in-Chile.html It's obvious that we live in interesting and dangerous times, however, it would be fair to everyone if the government would fill us all in as to what they "think" is happening - but we all know that will never happen. William Cormier

  260. Spelling ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must have missed teh English 101 on Slashdot ...

    Vulcanism ? Is that something that happens on Planet Vulcan ? And is Spock aware that he needs to save us ? Again ? Kirk u there ?