Slashdot Mirror


Mafiaboy Gets His Wrist Slapped

An anonymous reader writes: "Mafiaboy, the Canadian 'hacker' that did the DOS on Ebay, Amazon, Excite, CNN, etc. has gotten 8 months in a youth detention centre and 1 year probation. Prosecuters think this will be a message to 'hackers' that do this kind of thing. I say the message should be to the scriptkiddies who obviously don't know how to cover their tracks, to at least learn to do so before they download malicious software." The other message is that even if you get caught, your sentence will be ridiculously easy.

373 comments

  1. Wrist? by mwillems · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems to me 8 months in juvenile detention is not 'getting his wrist slapped'. At 17, 8 months is an eternity. This will n ot be nice for him.

    Michael

    --

    ---
    BDOS ERR ON A:>
    1. Re:Wrist? by Foggy+Tristan · · Score: 4, Funny

      "So what you are in for?"

      "Denial of Service on EBay. You?"

      "I put my sister in the hospital because she was hogging the computer."

      "Eeep."

      --
      Beware typoes.
    2. Re:Wrist? by dirtboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Having know various people that have spent time in "juvie hall" and assuming mafiaboy fits the stereotype of a kid way into computers it quite likely will be the hardest 8 months he ever has to endure, the amount of time is guaranteed, what can and will happen to him while he is there is undeterminable. It could range from constant boredom to constant fear and terror.

      I think of foremost importance is the fact that the rehabilitation opportunites there are more focused on drug abuse, and obtaining a high school diploma, he's personal growth and certainly his computer knowledge will be stunted.

      It's certainly not a slap on the wrist, but I also strongly believe that the punishment, sentence, whatever, will do little in the way to address his mischieviousness.

    3. Re:Wrist? by xonker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From all the accounts I've heard of "juvie," it's not much better than prison, with all the attendant horrors of prison. I think this is a little too harsh for computer crimes committed by a minor.

      My fear would be that he either will not survive the experience or that he would leave a far worse person than when he enters...

    4. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sentence is to low if you ask me. I dont care about
      what will happen to me in detention becouse he should
      have thought of consequenses before doing this things.

      He disturbed allot of services, he angried many people
      and did illigal things. He cannot say he didnt under-
      stand what this meant, if he's so stupid not under-
      standing what consequenses his actions might have
      how the heck did he manage to create so much
      touble?

      For the greif he have done to me and others the 8
      months and $160 USD is not enough, he should have
      paid least 10% $1.7B USD and then put to jail for least
      2 years.

      He's future should be destroyed for being so plain
      idiotic.

    5. Re:Wrist? by solaris_system · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      He should have gotten three eternities

    6. Re:Wrist? by Evil+Al · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but now he will have a record. These day, having a criminal record makes it extremely difficult to get a job; impossible to get a government job; extremely difficult to visit other countries where visas are required; and generally messes up the rest of your life.

      If he had done something clever he could have hoped to get a job doing computer security, but as a scriptkiddie who got caught, he's basically messed up his whole life.

      --
      Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
    7. Re:Wrist? by agdv · · Score: 1

      I thought his record would be erased on his 18th birthday. At least that's what happened to my friends' records on possesion, etc.

    8. Re:Wrist? by dragons_flight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree, it's not really a slap on the wrist. Seems to me like it strikes a pretty good balance between the need to recognize that this is a serious crime and deter him and others from doing it again, and the need to recognize that he's still young and should be allowed to show that he can mature and become a productive member of society.

      In many prison systems there is an emphasis on simply locking people away and doing little or nothing beyond that to rehabilitate them. This kid, like a lot of other people commiting sophisticated crime, probably has a good intelligence and real potential to contribute to society.

      I truly believe we need a system of criminal justice that effectively deals with the mental illness and lack of education that contributes to crime. We should foster productive life skills and punishments that are appropriate to rehabilitation. Non-violent white collar crime certainly isn't deserving of long sentences on first offense. When people have shown that they won't or can't change and continue to offend then it's reasonable for society to consider locking them up for long times merely to keep them out of society.

      Compassion and forgiveness have a place in justice, whenever promoting society's respect for life and liberty can be balanced against our need for security. Overly strict law will promote hate, mistrust, and fear among the innocent as well as the guilty.

      Those 8 months will be a life altering experience for this kid, as most certainly the arrest and trial already have been. This is a pretty reasonable solution.

    9. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And think, he went down for things he didn't do... I know firsthand he wasn't the main one, he was a copycat...

      I was interviewed several times by the FBI for my knowledge of another suspect, they were monitoring our IRC channel also, because when we'd give false information, it'd be on CNN 20 minutes later that police had a lead "on suspects in the midwest"... this was totally because of us...

      mafiab0y did the latter attacks, the big ones, were not him... that and the fact it is hard to prove a ddos attacks origin probably lead to this light sentence...

    10. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you hire anybody who did what he did in a computer security position? I certainly wouldn't.

    11. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES, DESTROY HIS FUTURE, HE WONT TAKE IT OUT ON YOU AT ALL. THANKS FOR THE JOB TRAINING, AMERICA.

      fucking americans, I hate em all. I am from chicago, living in rochester, new york. I will beat every last one of you senseless, or senseful since you already are.

    12. Re:Wrist? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Yep.

      I had a friend in Canada who, a juvenile herself, was raped on two separate occasions, the second by juveniles. She never reported it, and wouldn't have even if she knew who they were; she would have been lucky if the persons involved got any jail time, let alone enough to keep her safe for a measurable amount of time. At 18, their slate would have been wiped clean.

      Canada goes way too easy on juveniles. You can brag about your murder rate and automotive theft rates all you want; your rape and aggrevated assault rates are obscene.

      -= rei =-

      --
      And I'd like to be the king of all Londinium and wear a shiny hat.
    13. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8 Months is a slap on the wrist for a crime that that benefited nobody and inconvienenced millions. There can be no justification for DOS or virus writing, they do not only gain no benefit for the criminal, they can cost Millions of dollars to effected corporations.

      They penalty should be measured in years not Months.

    14. Re:Wrist? by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck is it that people get more upset about a kid who cost some company that no one really gives a ratfuck about some cash, than people being murdered!?!?! The kid would've been better off murdering someone and claiming he thought they'd come back to life just like in nintendo... then he'd only have gotten a few months and some psychiatry... how fucking pitiful...

      ... I think I'll go become a hermit somewhere... :(

    15. Re:Wrist? by Snootch · · Score: 1

      8 Months is a slap on the wrist for a crime that that benefited nobody and inconvienenced millions. There can be no justification for DOS or virus writing, they do not only gain no benefit for the criminal, they can cost Millions of dollars to effected corporations.

      This is fair enough, but compare it to other crimes committed at that age, and this is a serious punishment.

      Plus, at that age, a sentence "measured in years" would only serve to remove all chance of rehabilitation he had.

    16. Re:Wrist? by dadragon · · Score: 1
      For the greif he have done to me and others the 8 months and $160 USD is not enough, he should have paid least 10% $1.7B USD and then put to jail for least 2 years.

      FYI, 160USD is not what you think. It's just like $250USD in the States. The Canadian dollar has as much buying power (in Canada) as does the US dollar (in the US). Here, a $15USD CD still costs $15, not $24 or whatever the equivalent is.

      And to be put in jail for 2 years, he needed to commit 1) an Indictable offence, which you Americans would call a felony and 2) whould have had to do it as a non young offender.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    17. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you actually saying that he should pay $170 million USD as a fine? You can levy a fine as big as you want, but where do you think he could ever get the money to pay that off? Besides, the damage costs in cases like this are always overexaggerated.

    18. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is known for 2 thing: Beer and Beaver.

      And wow do they go good together.

      This explains the rape.

    19. Re:Wrist? by James+Nolan · · Score: 1

      I truly believe we need a system of criminal justice that effectively deals with... the lack of education that contributes to crime.

      I think you need an education system that deals with the lack of education.

      You don't have one of those yet.

    20. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What record? He's still a kid. On your 18th birthday thta record is gone. Or is Canada one of the those retarded coutries that considers minors fully responsible for their actions?

      Anyway, 8 months? Did he kill some sys-admins along with the attack or something? Djeez. It's not the kids fault. You don't give a kid a gun, hoping he will never fire it.

    21. Re:Wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the spirit. First you abuse our inteernet for your stupid bussines -whitout even asking. Then when you completly fucked it up -without that you're even get punished for that- you think you can judge other people that are using the internet to learn?

      You have NO rights on the internet at all. All the financial loses you claim aren't the kid's fault, but only a result of your poor knowledge and your greedyness. I hope you get broke very soon.

      Have a nice day,
      DJefke aka Christophe Van Reeth

    22. Re:Wrist? by cnf · · Score: 1

      1st of all i dont think "what he did" was all that
      as far as skill is concernedits a walk in the park
      so i wouldn't hire him per se
      if he had done something interesting, maybe i would

      2ndly ( and this is my main point) it's tipical for a grand state to punish after the facts but to iddle befor the fact
      where is he education ?
      who ever thought him that DoS sing a site was like stealing or joyriding ?
      i mean the internet is a pretty anonymous thing
      no faces
      no voices
      and don't tell me that you don't like that
      why aren't there pc educations at scool that cover that ?
      when i 1rst touched a computer i was 23 and ethically well formed
      but do you think a 14 or 15 year old kid is ethicaly formed?
      punishing creates fear for the oppressor
      educartion an positive encuragement , understanding

      think about it

      cnf
      cnf@antwerpen.be

    23. Re:Wrist? by Jestah · · Score: 1

      Not the kids fault? Did the computer do it on it's own?

    24. Re:Wrist? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Insensitive jerk.
      Do you have any clue what rape is like?

      -= rei =-

      --
      And I'd like to be the king of all Londinium and wear a shiny hat.
  2. hmmm by Spagornasm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, basically, the message is "Don't try to fight us - you'll be slapped?"

    That's not a good message at all. It should either be: Don't even try cause you can't break through (which is crap) or Don't even try because we'll use our lawyers to grind you into a financial and legal pulp.

    Neither of these are very helpful to the government, or to industry...

    What a wishy-washy end to a case that could have set some important precedents and lessons...

    --

    When nuance becomes the only objective we lose the ability to function
    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



      How do you think the case should have gone (so that it's not - in your words - wishy-washy)?

  3. I dunno... by boinger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    8 months for a scrawny nerd in a juvenile detention center? He's going to get the shit kicked out of him regularly, I would surmise. That's a pretty hard sentence for running some other idiot's code.

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    1. Re:I dunno... by MatthewLovelace · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that he'll probably come out with an anus as wide as the Lincoln tunnel from repeated rape, and maybe a nice case of HIV.

      --

      ******
      "What makes you think I care about your opinions?"

    2. Re:I dunno... by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      Then I suppose he shouldn't have done it. That's what laws are for.

    3. Re:I dunno... by skotte · · Score: 0

      hmm. not a bad couple points. he probably will be beaten regularly. unless he plays it smart and makes fFriends..

      but about other people's code ... i dunno about that. i mean, people make devices all the time, and they person that actually commited the dirty act goes to jail. that's how it should be, I believe.

      spreading knowledge of how to do things: ok. actually DOING those things: not ok.

    4. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you saying that we shouldn't put to jail those who kill with gun/weapon since they didn't made it ...

    5. Re:I dunno... by pallex · · Score: 1

      Oh you give him a more suitable sentence, like using his skills for a charity, or having him design websites or something.
      That's what justice is for.

      On the other hand, 8 months fixing bugs in Perl...

    6. Re:I dunno... by jms · · Score: 1

      hmm. not a bad couple points. he probably will be beaten regularly. unless he plays it smart and makes fFriends..

      ... Translated ... The gang members are going to beat and abuse him unless he plays it smart and joins a gang himself for protection.

      Anyone who thinks that 8 months in juvi is "a slap on the wrist" has no idea what he is talking about. He's going to come out of those 8 months a changed person.

    7. Re:I dunno... by CaptJay · · Score: 3, Informative
      He's going to get the shit kicked out of him regularly, I would surmise. That's a pretty hard sentence for running some other idiot's code.


      No, he's not. Juvenile centers are nothing like jails. There are always educators with the kids, and bullies would not get away even with threatening to beat him up. They'd be brought back before a judge before they know it.


      Most juvenile centers also have kids from the "Youth Protection Department" (DPJ in French) that have been taken from their families for their OWN safety. Therefore, the centers know very well how to protect their "residents".
      p>

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
    8. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should kill the first person he meets. That way people will leave him alone.

    9. Re:I dunno... by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      He's going to come out of those 8 months a changed person.


      Boy, do you have that right. He wont only be able to DOS a few web sites, but now he will be able to steal cars and peddle drugs much more efficiently than before!

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    10. Re:I dunno... by skotte · · Score: 0

      ha ha :) good translation, thanks. exactly my point!

      never been in juvie, so i cant speak fFor that. but i'm pretty sure that throwing a smart kid in there is not the answer. (yeah, i think he's a smart kid. i dont know him, but you have to be some level of intelligent to operate a script fFully.)

      that kid's gonna get out, still have the know how to crack and splat sites at will, and his general ethics-base will be a lot lower.

      in short, they're probably condemning him to a life of hard-core technology-based crime.

      (lordie i don't want to be right . . . .)

    11. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      This is not true. The security measures at juvenile dentention centers vary widely in their effectiveness.

      A few weeks ago at the center near where I live a new inmate was beaten to a pulp by fellow inmates less than an hour after he was admitted. To top it off, they pissed and shit all over him. This happened despite the fact that it is the policy of the center to have guards check on the well being of every inmate at least once an hour. Events like these are so routine it didn't even make the news. I only know about it from people who work there.

      The perpetrators' excuse was "We were bored and wanted something to do."

    12. Re:I dunno... by CaptJay · · Score: 1

      Just to be sure, I was talking about Quebec juvenile centers, not juvenile centers in general.

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
    13. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Then I suppose he shouldn't have done it. >That's what laws are for.

      Then I hope you don't have any illegal copies of software, audio or video. In that case you commited a serious fellony.
      The punishment for that should then be the chair if I follow your theory.

      DJefke aka Christophe Van Reeth

    14. Re:I dunno... by really? · · Score: 1

      Which alternate reality are you talking about?

      In a different life - granted, over eleven years ago - I worked with Juvenile Centres. Hell on Earth for 99% of the kids in there. No better at doing something good for the kids than jails are for adults.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    15. Re:I dunno... by CaptJay · · Score: 2

      There were three words missing from my above post:
      "here in Quebec", where the Mafiaboy in question happens to live. I was by no means asserting something true for all of the world's youth centers.

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
  4. At least there is some punishment... by mfarah · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Over here (Chile), a 15-year old script kiddie cracked a webhosting company (Meganet) [presumably abusing a very stupid security hole]. Guess what he got? A job... in the very same company as an apprentice.



    At least, this Mafiaboy has gotten a "bad boy!" message...

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
    1. Re:At least there is some punishment... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Companies need to start to realize to not award people that maliciously attack web companies with jobs. That's saying "I'm glad you broke in, here's a cushy job, oh yeah, don't worry about being punished because what you did is okay."

    2. Re:At least there is some punishment... by update() · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Over here (Chile), a 15-year old script kiddie cracked a webhosting company (Meganet) [presumably abusing a very stupid security hole]. Guess what he got? A job... in the very same company as an apprentice.

      I don't know how common it is for that to happen but the belief is common among script kiddies that their antics are going to lead to high-paying jobs at the sites they attack. I recall a Slashdot article a while back about an article on some h4x0r website that was actually complaining that it wasn't working out that way for the author. Slashdot search is broken now but maybe one of the people who post those "We had this two years ago! Morons!" bits the moment a duplicate story is put up can confirm my memory.

      Incidentally, while 8 months in juvie isn't overkill, I've got to disagree with Rob that it's a slap on the wrist.

    3. Re:At least there is some punishment... by nirnaeth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say that as if its a bad thing. I would think that a job in which a kid could learn and develop new skills is a far better form of 'rehabilitation' than 8 months of getting the crap kicked out of him.

    4. Re:At least there is some punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least this company proves that idiots
      are not everywhere. Instead of sending him to
      prison (or whatever) to learn how to survive
      constant bullying, he can be useful to show
      people of this company how to tighten the
      security.

      That sounds like a good thing to me.

    5. Re:At least there is some punishment... by MattW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He's not the first person that's happened to. In the past, I hired one person primarily experienced as a 'hacker' -- and he was not only our best engineer, but within years was the CTO of a very well-funded startup (that lives yet).

    6. Re:At least there is some punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      getting a reward for doing wrong gives that person a horible mindset.

    7. Re:At least there is some punishment... by skotte · · Score: 0

      heh. that's got kind of a norman rockwell fFeel to it, doesnt it? you know, like the kind hearted old man taking in the lonely misunderstood youth who just broke into his house .. that sort of thing.

      still, if the company had very limited resources, and a hard time fFinding new techs, an obviously skilled employee could be realy usefull. keep an eye on him, of course, and don't let him too near accounting ...

    8. Re:At least there is some punishment... by Karn · · Score: 1

      No, you're biased b/c you're a nerd.

      In most societies, we have rules. We know the rules, and we know if we break the rules that we will have to suffer some consequences (perhaps this kid thought he was invincible, as do many script-kids.)

      He broke some rules, and he should be punished for it. AFTER he serves his time, and after he learns his LESSON, then perhaps a company can say "Hey, can we hire you?", not before.

      What you people are saying is that if a 17 year old steals from someone, instead of punishing them for that which they knew was wrong, we should put them in a position where they can prevent stealing. Or for a more extreme example, taking a murderer and hiring them to work for the police dept.

      Consider work ethics.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    9. Re:At least there is some punishment... by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      It is a bad thing. The kid who gets the job may not cause any more trouble, thanks to having real responsibilities, but it encourages another 10 to take his place.

    10. Re:At least there is some punishment... by mfarah · · Score: 2
      You say that as if its a bad thing. I would think that a job in which a kid could learn and develop new skills is a far better form of 'rehabilitation' than 8 months of getting the crap kicked out of him.



      It IS a bad thing: the company treated him as a genius that deserved a good job (blah blah blah). All the people who know a bit about how things work know this is just show in order to save face, but the script kiddies are dumb enough to believe it, and now have a powerful signal saying "D00d, if u br3ak d law, u get reward3d w1th a j0b!!!", or some crap like that.

      --
      "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
      - Sledge Hammer
    11. Re:At least there is some punishment... by sheetsda · · Score: 2

      No, its saying, "Hey, you broke in, nice job. We'll pay you if you continue trying and tell us about security holes before anyone else finds them." My high school had me doing the same thing my junior and senior years, and their security got really hard to circumvent after a while.

    12. Re:At least there is some punishment... by grue23 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's kind of funky. One site I was doing some work for was using a well known chat server. Some kids would find out what the new exploit was whenever a new version came out, and take over admin within a few days. We finally started talking with him and he told us he just wanted to prove that he was good enough to be the chat admin for us!

    13. Re:At least there is some punishment... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      I think you failed to see the evident sarcasm in my statement. Any reasonably-minded person can make the link that you described.

      Case in point: I myself along with a friend of mine were assigned to the task of finding out who kept on deleting local copies of Cadkey (a DOS CAD program) on a section of the Novell token ring network at my high school. We basically made DOS batch commands to circumvent every known method to move, erase or delete the files. It worked because when a user runs a command if for instance a COPY.BAT and COPY.COM executables are found in the path, the batch file is run first. Instead of performing these tasks, it records the users' info with some nifty command and displays output to fool the user into thinking it worked. That way we could see what they full intentions were.

      The school knew we knew too much about the network, so they just let it slide in exchange of this service. Needless to say, the reports dwindled in size quickly.

  5. Wow 8 months, big deal by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    So he got 8 months of detentions and he will be allowed occasional visits to family and friends during his time in detention. Besides, have you guys seen Canadian detention centers? They get treated better than ordinary people.

    1. Re:Wow 8 months, big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      next time, please think before you post. and qualify your information to avoid your sweeping generalizations. your name should be DumbBeast.

    2. Re:Wow 8 months, big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually for about ten years before I entered our illustrious high tech field I worked in many Young Offender facilities and let me tell ya, It ain't a picnic. If you don't mind being told when to get up, when to go to sleep, when to eat and when to sh*t then it's good...otherwise its a jail. They can't leave, watch TV (unless it's open custody, not the case here) or just hang out. Guards and overnight workers shine lights in their eyes during the hourly head counts.

      Remember the most luxourious guilded cage is still a cage...

      When your 17 , 8 months is an eternity (ei think of your life WITHOUT grade 12).

    3. Re:Wow 8 months, big deal by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      it's open custody, at least that what I've heard on Montreal's TV.

  6. 1.3 Billion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..was the figure listed in the article. I swear, do they pull these numbers out of air? I can hardly see that ebay, yahoo and the like being offline for half a day is worth 1.3 billion.

    Especially seeing as they, as business entities, aren't capable of making that much money. And money that fails to move isn't 'lost in damages', it just doesn't move.

    1. Re:1.3 Billion.. by Jeff+Knox · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know, they dont even bring in any profits in the first place.In fact, by being offline for half a day, I think Mafiaboy saved them millions if anything. The combined quarterly revenues of those companys doesnt even equal that figure.

      --
      Jeff Knox
    2. Re:1.3 Billion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there's the cost of bandwidth consumed.
      No where near that, that's just bullshit legal bullshitting. But he's still a punk.

    3. Re:1.3 Billion.. by infodragon · · Score: 1

      The compaines get to write it off, the reported losses that is, and the way corporate taxes work, it is a lot of mony that they get to keep.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.
    4. Re:1.3 Billion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I can see why the penality of hacking your own computer to remove the "digital right" protection in the proposed law is max of 5 years of jail and $500,000 fine.

      The poor record companies must be losing tens of billions of dollars just because I flash my bios on my PC or CDRW or DVD or SCSI card.

  7. only 8 months?!? by eoPh · · Score: 0

    yea, the sentence seems a little short. I mean, sure 8 months may seem like a "long time", but if you engage in criminal activities as such, don't expect to get off light. just because the crime was committed on a computer, dosn't mean that it's any less of a crime.

    I know some people would disagree with me, but I'm quite set on my view with this. It's not like he was trying to perpetrate freedom of information or anything like that. He didn't crack CSS or E-Book security.

    I really doubt we'll be seeing any "Free Mafiaboy" buttons, banners or bumper stickers

    1. Re:only 8 months?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps 8 months will be an appropriate amount of time (as opposed to, say, decades of federal prison like we'd hand out in the U.S.) for him to think about what he did wrong, decide to take different actions in the future, and become a productive member of Canadian society. You know, rehabilitation -- what prisons were at one time supposed to be about.

  8. Canadian Detention by mcwop · · Score: 2, Funny
    How tough is Canadian juvenile detention? Does this mean he has to play hockey without a stick?

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    1. Re:Canadian Detention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your response, juvenile detention in canada is pretty soft. You live in a dorm with 11 others kids, you have to go to school (sometime a internal school) and play hockey in a gym all the nights.

      Its a pretty good place to discover drug and to think the society suck.

      From my own experience, its pretty cool to have the chance of tasting this kind of environment. (i stay in a place like that for 1 year)

    2. Re:Canadian Detention by WebBug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on exactly where it is that he gets sent. The "detention" centre near where I live uses the "detainees" as labour to keep the 160 acre centre looking like a park. They maintain the gardens, fences, fields and forests in pristine park like conditions.

      They are given the full provincial standard education. No skipping, no slacking.
      I don't know if they learn anything or not. I guess that's up to them.

      It certainly isn't something that this young fellow is going to enjoy.

      The recidivism rate in Canada, last I checked, for these centres is less than 1/3.

      --
      Later . . . . . . WebBug // I don't really have 8 arms but . . .
    3. Re:Canadian Detention by beanerspace · · Score: 2

      Does this mean he has to play hockey without a stick?
      Consider this, hocky is the only game I know where you field 12 guys on a surface hard and slick enough to break bones and skulls, put sticks in their hands, knives on their feet and chase a 90mph pojectile, and where fighting is okay if it's one-on-one. If anything, a little hocky might give the boy some perspective of what it means to get his ass kicked.

      On a serious note, I agree with the call that the punishment should fit the crime. I'm wondering if there is a way of handing the pup an old machine with and made to write a solution using assembly language.

    4. Re:Canadian Detention by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      I'm wondering if there is a way of handing the pup an old machine with and made to write a solution using assembly language.
      Ooooh, no.
      Not assembly language.

      COBOL.

    5. Re:Canadian Detention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one should have to suffer programming in COBOL. That's just sick.

    6. Re:Canadian Detention by Swaffs · · Score: 1

      Boy, makes you think that Sircam really came from a Canadian juvenile detention centre.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    7. Re:Canadian Detention by beanerspace · · Score: 1

      COBOL ?

      No, that would never fly here in the U.S., we have laws against cruel and unusual punishment.

  9. Don't worry... by reynaert · · Score: 1

    With Windows XP and raw sockets, covering their tracks shouldn't be a problem anymore. As long as they can find their n3w l33t h4x0r warez.

    1. Re:Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, somebody puh-leze mod this ignorant fool down!

  10. It's like sex by jeneag · · Score: 0

    the sex is forbidden for the kids, and they are attracted to it. Alcohol forbidden, and they are attracted to it. Smoking - same story. So does "hacking" (script... whatever)

    1. Re:It's like sex by Nater · · Score: 2

      You know, I think the is the only comparison between hacking and sex that ever actually made sense. There is a good point in the parent comment. Why it was modded down is far beyond my comprehension.

      To restate: There are quite a few examples of things which are illegal for kids, and in some cases for anyone, to do. Kids do them anyway, in some cases, simply because they are illegal and doing them would be rebelious.

      Don't mod this comment up. Mod the parent up.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    2. Re:It's like sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree to the attraction aspect. I was caught remotely hacking a school server, in which I changed access privileges for students to admin and revoked all privileges from teachers and staff. I was 16 at the time (now 22 and fully realize my stupidity). I find that many of today's kids are extremely knowledgable of computers and are willing to do almost anything to prove it. Really all these gifted kids need is a way to direct their talents for good purposes, such as a job or involvment in the open source community perhaps. I was sentenced to a $250 restoration fine and 30 hours of community service (which they asked me to fulful by programming a youth court database to track progress of other troubled youth.) I suppose that the only way it is not related to sex, alcohol, or tobacco, is that malicious hacking never becomes legal when you get older, the punishment only gets harsher

  11. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU spend 8 months imprisoned (youth oriented is STILL a lack of freedom) and a year being watched over like a hawk. Then tell me it's "rediculously easy".

    No, what this proves is that corporate America can point there finger and judicial america will do their bidding.

    1. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, what this proves is that corporate America can point there finger and judicial america will do their bidding.

      Hey, hoser! There's no "judicial America" here. He's canadian, eh?

  12. Rediculously easy? by Jeff+Knox · · Score: 1

    Do you call that sentance a slap on the wrist. Thats a rediculous statement. That sentance if overly harsh at best. 8 months in what is basically Jail for teenagers, and 1 year probation? Thats a pretty harsh sentance. Things like this dont make retribution for what hackers did, and in the case of teenagers like Mafiaboy, they only hurt the potential of what a smart young computer nerd could end up becoming, because he was thrown in jail. I personally think all hackers should only be on probation (WITH computer access), or in country club prisons, or forced to work for the government or something of that nature. To incarcirate a hacker is stupid, and puts them in the same ranks as murderers and drug dealers.

    --
    Jeff Knox
    1. Re:Rediculously easy? by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To incarcirate a hacker is stupid

      I disagree. It sends a message that this sort of behavior will not be tolerated.

      I personally think all hackers should only be on probation (WITH computer access)

      What? That's like putting a drunk driver on probation with access to a to some liquor and a car. Denying a convicted hacker computer access is an appropriate form of punishment. It's like denying a child television when they disobey.

      If Mafiaboy was a real smart computer nerd, he would have known that his actions were wrong and not did what he did.

    2. Re:Rediculously easy? by pa-guy · · Score: 0

      You stupid cunt. They ARE in the same ranks as murderers and drug dealers. They committed a crime, and therefore should be punished. Perhaps it is not retribution for the damages, however it may make the little bastard think twice before he d/l's his next root kit. You can go ahead and employ the 'smart young computer nerd' all you want, but the little prick won't get a job with me.

    3. Re:Rediculously easy? by sys$manager · · Score: 0

      No, if mafiaboy was a real smart computer nerd, he would never have been caught.

    4. Re:Rediculously easy? by tmark · · Score: 2

      I personally think all hackers should only be on probation (WITH computer access), or in country club prisons, or forced to work for the government or something of that nature. To incarcirate a hacker is stupid, and puts them in the same ranks as murderers and drug dealers.
      I suppose you also think that white-collar criminals who, say, embezzle money or commit mail fraud should get sent only to country club prisons or get similarly cushy sentences. What exactly makes incarcerating hackers stupid ? Are they subject to some higher form of justice than everyone else ? As the theme song from Baretta says, "don't do the crime if you can't do the time", and I for one will have precious little sympathy for any future script-kiddies who try the same sort of thing. They have been warned, and good for the Canadian justice system for warning them.

    5. Re:Rediculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mafiaboy, they only hurt the potential of what a smart young computer nerd could end up becoming,

      Who do you call a smart young computer nerd? A
      scriptkiddie? An idiot who didnt even know you should
      not brag about this? An idiot using pseudonym 'mafiaboy'?

      There are talanted hackers, those who are, are seen
      in diffrent places for their work. Not like scriptkiddies
      who managed to find an application and klick 'ok' to
      start DoS'ing.

      He is nothing more than a moron, he is probably the
      most stupid scriptkiddie in the world of all of them.

    6. Re:Rediculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was a real smart computer nerd, he never would have pointlessly DoS'd the sites.

    7. Re:Rediculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dumb ones get caught. The smart ones don't get caught. The geniuses don't do anything wrong in the first place.

    8. Re:Rediculously easy? by looie · · Score: 4, Funny
      Do you call that sentance a slap on the wrist. Thats a rediculous statement. That sentance if overly harsh at best. 8 months in what is basically Jail for teenagers, and 1 year probation? Thats a pretty harsh sentance. Things like this dont make retribution for what hackers did, and in the case of teenagers like Mafiaboy, they only hurt the potential of what a smart young computer nerd could end up becoming, because he was thrown in jail. I personally think all hackers should only be on probation (WITH computer access), or in country club prisons, or forced to work for the government or something of that nature. To incarcirate a hacker is stupid, and puts them in the same ranks as murderers and drug dealers.

      Well, perhaps while attending school there, he will learn to spell correctly and to write grammatical sentences. These skills will undoubtedly be beneficial to him when he enters the job market. You can probably testify to that.

      mp

      --
      "The secret to strong security: less reliance on secrets." -- Whitfield Diffie
    9. Re:Rediculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all hackers should only be on probation (WITH computer access)

      Then why bother punishing them all, if going to trial is the only real punishment?

      Somebody takes down several popular web sites, cost a lot of money in lost revenue/bandwidth, and all they get is sent back home and told to check in once in a while? How is that going to teach them anything, let alone scare anyone else away from doing it? They'll just try it again, and this time they'll probably be able to hide their identity. Sending hackers to "country club prisons" and other harmless "punishments" puts hackers in the same catagory as vandals and litterers.

      He didn't do it because he was curious what would happen. He did it because he knew he could do damage and annoy somebody without getting caught. The same thing every script kiddie thinks, only he went to the trouble of doing it. Unfortunately for him, he was wrong and did get caught.

      And as for this sentence stunting his education and ruining his future, I'll repeat what someone else said: If he was really so smart, he wouldn't have done it in the first place.

      And BTW, it's "sentence", not "senance".

    10. Re:Rediculously easy? by JLinden · · Score: 1

      There is an underscoring theme in many of these threads that I think needs to be addressed. Many people seem to think that we are wasting the potential of a smart young man. What exactly makes you think that he is so smart? That he used somebody's readymade code to attack well known sites? He isn't a hacker; he isn't even a cracker. He's a script kiddie, and I don't think that makes for intelligence at all.

    11. Re:Rediculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps all budding car bombers should be allowed to take their chemistry sets into jail, what about burglars let them have locks to test their skills on ? What sort of idiotic logic is it to say that criminals who commit crimes with computers should be allowed be allowed to continue their activities whilst in jail ? Sorry, forger you're not a geek so you can't take your forgery kit into jail but the geek can take his computer - its so important he learns where he made his hacking mistakes. If you abuse a skill or talent to commit a crime you can't be trusted not to do it again, why encourage a repeat performance ?

      The author is obviously one of those blokes who thinks that encouraging computer skills per se is important irrespective of the use they are put to.

  13. Ridiculously Easy? by nirnaeth · · Score: 1

    ... Don't know about that, 8 months is a long ass time, and a complete disruption of a 17 yr old's life. Sucks to be him.

    1. Re:Ridiculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't violate someone else's rights.

    2. Re:Ridiculously easy? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. I was just trying to give a picture of what 8 months really is. You can decide if it's a sufficient punishment.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    3. Re:Ridiculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last eight month is almost like a career in the falling economy...

    4. Re:Ridiculously easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of sentence do you want?

      Hard time with fines, make him repay his debt to society. Ideally, 10 strokes of the cane but that's unlikely, because the Canadians prefer to coddle felons.

      Will you not be satisfied until his life is ruined?

      He's an antisocial fuck who was dumb enough to get caught. His DoS attacks cost real individuals a great deal of real money and were the cyberspace equivalent of vandalism. To treat him as if he was anything other than a little punk is ridiculous.

    5. Re:Ridiculously easy? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      To treat him as if he was anything other than a little punk is ridiculous.

      Exactly. So why do you want to treat him like a felon?

      8 months in juvie sounds good for a punk.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:Ridiculously easy? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Considering there is no such thing as "Felon" in Canada. We don't have the American "Misdomeanor" and "felony"s... we have summary (less than two years), indictable (more than two years), and hybrid or dual-procedure (one trial to determine if the crime is summary or indictable, and the actual trial)

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    7. Re:Ridiculously easy? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Considering there is no such thing as "Felon" in Canada.

      So?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    8. Re:Ridiculously easy? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Just getting random points about differences between Canada's legal system in where I can. That's all.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    9. Re:Ridiculously easy? by Captain+Oblivious · · Score: 1
      Think of all you have done in the last 8 months, since January, and imagine being in a youth detention center instead.


      Not sur what you mean. I'm pretty sure it's ok to stand and scratch your ass in there, too.

  14. Easy? by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know what you think is easy about it. I spent time in a youth detention center and now as an adult every body I know that spends time in jail for DUI or otherwise tells me they would rather be in an adult prison than a youth detention center. In jail you get a TV, a matress some luxuries. In a youth center you get a thin matress resting on a concrete slab and that's it. No bathroom in your cell, no TV nothing.

    Also consider he will be surrounded by criminals who will likely kick the shit out of him regularly for being a "geek".

    There is nothing easy about this. Adults have rights, youths do not as a matter of law. It's a kangaroo court system. They sentenced him to 8 months but that could eaily turn into 8 years as he is likely to make fuck ups in there and will have to defend himself against the others which will make his time harder and longer.

    I feel sorry for him. Most people who go to a youth detention center often times become criminals as adults.

    I don;t know the details, he may very well deserve this, but I honestly from a first hand perspective don't think anyone deserves what the youth detention centers dish out.

    1. Re:Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't be in a youth center beyond his childhood.

    2. Re:Easy? by Nater · · Score: 2

      Most people who go to a youth detention center often times become criminals as adults.

      I find this assertion a little backward. I would be more inclined to believe that people who did things as kids that land them in juvie will continue to do those things as adults, and land in jail.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    3. Re:Easy? by solaris_system · · Score: 0

      oh no...don't take away a kids TV for 8 months

    4. Re:Easy? by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      That's exactly what he said.

    5. Re:Easy? by flatrock · · Score: 2

      Maybe these juvinile detention centers need better adult supervision so inmates can't be ablused by other inmates. That's a real and serious issue. But his illegal actions resulted in possibly a billion dollars in damages. The billion dollar figure is probably exaggerated, but he commited a serious crime, and should be facing a serious penalty. I don't think losing 8 months of his freedom is that serious of a penalty considering the crime he committed.

    6. Re:Easy? by Nater · · Score: 2

      No, he said they become criminals as adults... after juvenile detention. Not the same.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    7. Re:Easy? by CaptJay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know where you are from, but it definitely does not sound like Quebec (where Mafiaboy happens to live).

      Juvenile centers here are geared towards rehabilitating the kids. The kids are followed by psychologists and educators, forced to take standard provincial education (skip class and you end up before a judge who will most likely make your sentence more severe).

      My mother has been working in a juvenile center for over 25 years, with kids who murdered their parents, stole from almost everyone in their town, drug addicts, and worse. Some of the kids are irrecuperable, but most you CAN get to change and to function in society. Not once as she been physically attacked by kids there.

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
    8. Re:Easy? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, you're still mad at us for burning down your capitol building in 1812?! :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    9. Re:Easy? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Yes he can, as long as he was put there before his 18th birthday. Read the Young Offenders Act.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    10. Re:Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The billion dollar figure is probably exaggerated, but he commited a serious crime, and should be facing a serious penalty. I don't think losing 8 months of his freedom is that serious of a penalty considering the crime he committed.

      So, basicly, you're saying that a billion dollars is worth a kid's life? What a nice world we life in.
      I mean, I don't; I life in a country where a kid _is_ considered a human being.

      DJefke aka Christophe Van Reeth

    11. Re:Easy? by flatrock · · Score: 2

      So, basicly, you're saying that a billion dollars is worth a kid's life? What a nice world we life in.
      I mean, I don't; I life in a country where a kid _is_ considered a human being.


      I didn't say to put him to death. I said he should be locked up for longer than 8 months. Our juvinile justice system does have a responsibility to keep him safe from his fellow inmates, and to make it possibly for him to continue his education, but he needs to pay a price for commiting a crime. No one else made him commit the crime. He did it on his own, and is responsible for the results. Many thousands of people were effected by his crime. He cost a lot of real people real money. All that money could have also gone into the pockets of hard working people who are now laid off. Instead it was just wasted because some kid felt like playing around and seeing if he could screw up the computer systems of some big compaines. Big companies are made up of people. In the end if you cost big companies a lot of money, either people pay higher prices, or get less for their money.

      This is not other people ruining his life, this is him paying the price for the actions he chose to take. In my opinion, the price he's paying isn't high enough.

  15. Canadian Law by BluedemonX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep in mind Canadian Law is goverened by the Young Offenders Act.

    Maximum Sentence for ANYTHING (mass murder, etc) is three years.

    By the standards of that act, he was punished very hard.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    1. Re:Canadian Law by Kengineer · · Score: 1

      True, true.

      Unlike America, where we try 11 year olds as adults. 8 months for a pranking kid is appropriate.

      - Kengineer

    2. Re:Canadian Law by Pez69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And of course once he turns 18 he losses all preivous criminal records. So a big company could hire him and have no way of know what he did as a kid.

      --

      Forever live the fighters!
    3. Re:Canadian Law by krikke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This sounds very reasonable to me. Who, as a teenager, hasn't done something incredibly stupid? I am all for children getting second chances. They haven't lived long enough to realize that their actions have consequences. These children should be closely monitored when released, though. They may have a tendancy to do stupid things.

    4. Re:Canadian Law by MattW · · Score: 2

      What's the canadian law's take on monetary damages? Because I don't really think sending him to prison does a lot of good...but how about 'restitution'? You could pick any amount, since the attacks literally caused millions in damage. (Even my own extremely peripheral involvement could have been billed for thousands of dollars worth of consulting time) Maybe his paying a $100k tab or such would help people realize this is serious.

    5. Re:Canadian Law by Kallahar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Financial penalties would not help anything. I, for example, am having a hard enough time just trying to make rent. Add an unreasonable amount to what I already owe and I may be forced to sell drugs just to cover the costs. That's definately not what anyone wants to see happen.

      Financial penalties usually make things worse, not better.

      Travis

    6. Re:Canadian Law by pallex · · Score: 1

      People always talk up the cost of stuff. I remember seeing something about how much spam costs industry. I hate spam as much as the next man, but it worked out at something like $80 to delete 3 pieces of spam a week. Can I have a job there please? I`ll do that for $10!
      I think its just companies being pissed off because their crap security, which they DID spend a lot of money on, was badly set up, and cracked by a 15 year old geek.

    7. Re:Canadian Law by Telal · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, the most recent amendments to that law increased the maximum sentence to six years and it's become more likely that older kids committing serious violent crimes will get transferred to adult court.

      There's no parole in the youth system so his eight month sentence really is an eight month sentence. Maybe the kid could have been fined more, but keep in mind that under the law, he's solely responsible for paying the fine (the judge can't make his parents pay) so the judge probably took into account what he could afford to pay. When I was 17, the amount of the fine he got was a lot of money.

      Considering that he seems to be a first-time offender, the sentence he got isn't that bad. The judge could have easily have let him off with a lecture and some sort of conditional discharge where he wouldn't be allowed to use a computer except at school.

    8. Re:Canadian Law by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Which is appropriate. He had none of the legal rights of an adult, so why should he have to take on the legal responsibilites?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:Canadian Law by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      What's the canadian law's take on monetary damages?
      Hardly. Québec civil law makes it illegal to seize any assets from anyone who has less than $6000 worth of assets, as well as basic home furniture (beds, tables, chairs, cutlery, applicances - but not TV, though) and tools of the trades.

      So, anybody thinking "monetary damages" is SOL.

      Which is good, because it protects ordinary people from sharks.

    10. Re:Canadian Law by dadragon · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely true. The record is hidden, which means that it is effectivly erased and cannot be used against you, but the RCMP-GRC can look it up. But private citizens and non-national law enforcement cannot look it up.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    11. Re:Canadian Law by dadragon · · Score: 1

      That's not just Quebec. Most (if not all) other provinces do that too.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    12. Re: Canadian Law by trapvector · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's assume that Mafiaboy is at least 17 years and 4 months old.

      He gets out of juvenile detention after eight months, and is now an adult. Cognitively, he's not that much different than when he started. Sure, he's picked up some undesirable behaviors from being around a bunch of young punks, but other than that, he's still pretty intelligent, and he's aware enough to know that what he was doing is still wrong...otherwise he wouldn't be bragging about it on IRC.

      So he goes back to DOS attacks. He gets caught. This time he's an adult. He does adult time for the same crime he committed a year ago. And since he's an adult, he does a lot of time. (comparatively) Now that he's been in REAL jail for upwards of a year, he's learned how to not only deface websites, but make knives out of chips of stone, sell crack, and rape burly men.

      There's injustice here somewhere, but I have yet to figure out where it is. Should youth be subject to more stringent sentences? Well... not in general, no. Should adults, who are expected to be responsible for their own behavior at all times, be treated like children, who have a notable tendency to screw things up and are therefore not necessarily responsible for themselves? Of course not. So what do you do when you're faced with a youth who knows what he's doing is wrong, and still has a promising future ahead of him, but can't quite shake the rebellious streak ground into him by years and years of rejection by his schoolmates? (huge assumption, but hey, it works.)

    13. Re:Canadian Law by Captain+Oblivious · · Score: 1
      Who, as a teenager, hasn't done something incredibly stupid?


      That's for sure. Most are just lucky enough to not get caught or suffer whatever possible consequences there might have been. I certainly did some pretty stupid stuff that just never happened to come back to bite me. For instance I.... well heck, I got away with 'em this long, I'm not about to spill my guts now.

    14. Re:Canadian Law by damiam · · Score: 1
      I think its just companies being pissed off because their crap security, which they DID spend a lot of money on, was badly set up, and cracked by a 15 year old geek.

      Mafiaboy isn't a geek, he's a script kiddie, and he didn't crack anything. He just ran a script and DDOS'd people. There's no way to defend against that, no matter how good your security is.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  16. Lame sentance? by eAndroid · · Score: 2

    I think Mafiaboy's age has to be taken into consideration. We don't want to go wrecking people's lives here just because of some childish mistake.

    Mafiaboy obviously did this just for the attention. What he really needs is a little love & compassion, hopefully at home.

    If he was American (or perhaps Russian *cough*Dmitry*cough*) would you think this sentance was lame?

    Also I'd like to point out that Taco's postscript editorials are getting more and more annoying.

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    1. Re:Lame sentance? by ravrazor · · Score: 1

      his editorials are annoying??
      how about the fact that his pathetic spelling is now propogating...
      it's not "the what-a-lame-sentance dept", it's "SENTENCE" for christ's sake.
      how can all these self-proclaimed genius nerds from slashdot be so retarded when it comes to spelling?
      its != it's
      effect != affect
      your != you're
      etc.etc.

      don't you people read any properly written english?

      what would you think you could gain any insight into programming from someone who kept on writing "mallock" and insisting "spelling doesn't matter". it would be obvious that this person is not a programmer and shouldn't be programming. well, all spelling mistakes do is show the illiteracy of the writer and make everyone forced to read it think, "why should i care what this individual's opinion is?".

      get a clue. learn the language you're trying to communicate in, especially if you expect anyone to listen.

      (this excludes typos, and non-native english speakers.)

    2. Re:Lame sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe someone could spend 8 months teaching you to spell sentence

    3. Re:Lame sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He caused real harm to people with real lives that work and use these sites. He deserves every day of his eight months. And a $160 US fine is retarded. That kid should be sued for at the very least the bandwidth his retarded ass wasted, if not for the average income for the amount of time those companies were pinned down.

      Liking computers and being a kid doesn't mean you get to harm other people. It's not ok because you want to be a m4d h4x0r.

      If this were in the U.S., he'd've probably been in jail for three years, and find thousands of dollars, as well as being libel for damages.

    4. Re:Lame sentance? by AnalogBoy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Katz has began placing his memory engrams into Taco. Its actually a plot by Katz to take over the world, one slashdot drone at a time. Invade the collective at the top level, and it shall spread down. Now before long well all be makeing speling and grammur err.. OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

      :]

    5. Re:Lame sentance? by eAndroid · · Score: 2

      You're right. I'd like to blame Taco. He has made my spelling so horrific.

      Nonetheless I also think that typos should not be excluded. I mean, unless that is something that is acceptable in programming.

      --

      I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    6. Re:Lame sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who don't capitalize properly are just as annoying.

    7. Re:Lame sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate that too! Those complaining are also guilty to a certain measure. Learn to write also comes to mind.

    8. Re:Lame sentance? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Mafiaboy obviously did this just for the attention. What he really needs is a little love & compassion, hopefully at home.
      This french article states that the judge blasted the parents:
      Ses parents, présents dans la salle, ont été écorchés dans le jugement, le juge déclarant qu'ils ne sont pas en mesure d'assurer un encadrement adéquat pour le jeune homme. Ils sont séparés et Mafiaboy vivait chez son père au moment de ses méfaits. Bien qu'ils le savaient recherché par les polices du Canada et des États-Unis, les parents n'ont pas dénoncé l'adolescent, ni sévi sérieusement contre lui, a souligné le juge Ouellet.

      His parents, present in the courtroom, were [skinned alive] by the judgment, the judge declared that they are not able to give a suitable living environment for the young man. They are separated and Mafiaboy was at his father's when he did his mischief. Even though they knew he was wanted by canadian and american police, the parents did not turn in the teenager, nor punish him seriously, said judge Ouellet (pronounced "well-let").

    9. Re:Lame sentance? by Guignol · · Score: 1

      how about the fact that his pathetic spelling is now propogating...
      Your right ! its scary !

    10. Re:Lame sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he wasn't sentenced in that God forsaken shithole of a justice system, now was he? Up here we're reasonable to our citizens. If they can't afford it, it's not a debt that's thrust upon them. In Canada's courts, lawsuits over the 1/2 million mark are extremly rare. Most Queen's Bench courts will just toss them out as unreasonable.

    11. Re:Lame sentance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >get a clue. learn the language you're trying to communicate in, especially if you expect anyone to listen.

      Yeah! That's the spirit! If you can't express your opinion on the real subject properly, just attack the opponent about his spelling.
      Just crawl back under the rock you cane from.

      >(this excludes typos, and non-native english speakers.)

      O, I see, you're just one of those nationalistic nazi Americans? So, we're not good enough because English isn't our native language? Wich language should we use then?
      The answer: no other language, because you would be to stupid to understand anything else!
      At least we do the effort to learn your language.

      DJefke aka Christophe Van Reeth

  17. Re:HACK THE PLANET by Nater · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dude! Dude! Dude! Dude! Dude! Dude! Guess what? Ok, so I was in this computer...

    --

    I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
    "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

  18. So..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So scriptkiddies get next to no sentence, but talented programmers doing quazi-legal hacks get many years without access to any computer equipment.

    That stinks.

    I say throw the book at the scriptkiddies. Maybe that will get them to stop scanning my cable modem IP address! I hate going through my firewall logs...

  19. I have to say.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    From the crowd that normally screams at how 'harsh' penalties for hackeres are, this shocks me.

    A 17 year old kid.. under our legal system, he's a *kid*, a jeuvenile. Why should he do hard prison time for this? How will that benefit society? 8 months in juvie is *plenty*, especially considering he didn't really hurt anyone. Sorry.. he may have, on paper, cost some *huge* *foreign* companies some cash..... but that's about it.

    1. Re:I have to say.. by Andux · · Score: 1
      *huge* *foreign* companies

      Make that really huge American companies.
      Anyone who messes with them is obviously some sort of evil, communist, hippie anarchist hacker bent on economic terrorism! And I bet they drown puppies and stomp on flowers, too! But don't worry, your friends at AOL/Time Warner/Microsoft/AT&T/Sprint/Verizon/Hewlett Packard Bell will save you!

      --
      (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
    2. Re:I have to say.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the man said originally - 'huge foreign companies'

      Ya gotta remember that to the rest of the world you Americans fall under the label foreigers.
      Mafiaboy is a Canuck afer all.

  20. Ridiculously easy? by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What kind of sentence do you want? Will you not be satisfied until his life is ruined?

    8 months is a long time. Think of all you have done in the last 8 months, since January, and imagine being in a youth detention center instead.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  21. Re: what-a-lame-sentance department by hodeleri · · Score: 2

    Isn't this the same /. that said Mafiaboy was a scapegoat?

  22. Everybody please keep it down. . ! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Yeah, Mafiaboy was an immature kid who fucked up major. Like any such kid who gets in over his or her head at a young age. Like the two 9 year olds who started the 'Tyre Fire' in Canada a decade ago. Mafiaboy was what? 15? I think the sentence was remarkably fair.

    I don't want to hear anybody aping at the 'ridiculously light' sentence. I'm just gald the legal system worked the way it was supposed to. If people laugh too hard, then maybe they will start putting 15 year olds away for 10 and 20 years for performing, basically, nothing crimes which are on par with vandalism.

    People couldn't access their email for a day and visit a bunch of so-so websites that only money mongers really care about. Nobody got hurt, and it showed that the web is what it is. --A geek project held together by duct tape, infused with a ton of money, and taken over by the popular kids and their big companies.


    -Fantastic Lad

    1. Re:Everybody please keep it down. . ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, he should have robbed a bank, since only money mongerers care about those.

      Get with it. Liking computers doesn't absolve you from punishment for violating the rights of others.
      Eight months is nothing.

  23. Sentence seems fair in Canada by Malc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Mafiaboy, [...] has gotten 8 months in a youth detention centre and 1 year probation. [...] The [other] message is that even if you get caught, your sentence will be ridiculously easy. "

    That seems fair to me, and in line with society's expectations. Was the crime so heinous that he needed to be tried as an adult? No. Was the crime so heinous that he needed a sentance as long as those handed down to rapists and murders? No. Please don't forgot, other countries aren't as keen as Americans seem to be when it comes to locking people up, and for how long they get locked away, e.g. murder in Britain might get you 20 years, but in the US life or even execution.

    1. Re:Sentence seems fair in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show what you bleeding heart idiots in your pseudo-socialist countries know about the U.S.

      It would be nice if murderers actually served their 30 year to life sentences, but the truth is large quantities of them do not. They're out, on average, in five years. Do you know how many repeat murderers we have? Just look up the statistics.
      You're more likely to serve more time for drug offenses than murder, unless you get no parol options.

      That doesn't even touch on the large quantities of people that get away with murder by claiming they forgot their baby in the car, or in the bath tub. Oh, we're sorry, have a four month probation sentence!

      Our legal system is retarded, not being it's too harsh, but because we punish people inconsistently and badly to boot.

    2. Re:Sentence seems fair in Canada by JohnSmith1138 · · Score: 1

      Not all Americans feel that way. I think that 8 months is just about right. He didn't do anything too heinous and this sentence will make him think about what he did and will make others think before they do something similar. I think as a teen and a hacker, I would be less inclined to do things like this if I knew there would be real punishment and not a real slap on the wrist like probation only or something similar. I think some people get desensitized to sentencing after hearing about others getting 10 years, 20 years or life for other crimes, but remember that this 8 months will affect his life and make him think again.

      Not all murderers in the US get executed or even life. There are plenty of murderers that get ridiculously low sentences as well.

  24. well, then what punishment would be reasonable? by teambpsi · · Score: 1
    i agree, 8 months (even in canada) is probably enough to make the kid think twice -- and hopefully other kids

    what is interesting was canada's cooperation in this matter -- if you are going to run, head south ;)

    kidding aside for a moment taco, what punishment do you think would actually be reasonable?

    slapping him with a huge ridiculous fine that he'd never be able to pay wouldn't have any teeth.

    and really, while I think DOS attacks deserve mitnick like sentencing on the kiddies, the protocols and the peering naps should be able to solve this -- its tech, fight it with tech.

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
    1. Re:well, then what punishment would be reasonable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's from Canada you retard.

    2. Re:well, then what punishment would be reasonable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and really, while I think DOS attacks deserve mitnick like sentencing on the kiddies

      For your information: While waiting for his trial, Mitnick was in isolated imprisonment for over 5 months.
      This means: no visitors, no contact with other prisoners, no tv, no newspapers, no books, nothing. Only the 4 walls of a small room all day long (except for a 10min walk everyday). He wasn't even allowed to write anything, like eg a diary.
      No, all day long lying on his bed, sitting on his bed, walking little circels in his cel, counting the number of bugs, ...

      I'm surprised he didn't went nuts of that.

      So, before you say something, think a little.

      DJefke aka Christophe Van Reeth

  25. hopefully he doesnt... by L-Wave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hopefully he doest get the "been there, done that" attitude, I mean sure 8 months, will this "scare him straight" or will it not scare him, and cause him to do worse acts because he's "been there before"?

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
  26. but.. by skotte · · Score: 0
    does he get an ethernet connection while he's in the pokey?

    ok, silly question, probably not. but then again, what about the library or any number of other locations?


    and the really important question:

    do they honestly think when he gets out he wont ever do anything "bad again"? like, where's the real motivation? 8 months in juvie hall, huh .. that's nuthin! kids get in knife fFights, go away fFor a year, get out, and started more knife fFights. 8 months fFor this? they might as well just shake a newspaper at him and so "no no! bad baby mafioso! no biscuit!"

    1. Re:but.. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Comparing the mentality it take to attack someone with a knife to the mentality it takes to run a script is patently stupid.

      Many people have done 'bad things' as a juvinille, and gone on to perfectly law abiding citizens.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:but.. by skotte · · Score: 0

      no no no ... i think you missed the point. i'm not talking knife=script. i'm talking (kid headed down the dark path of a life in and out of the justice system) = (kid headed down the dark path of a life in and out of the justice system).

      of course getting in a fFight isnt like running a script. but prison is only scary the fFirst time. i know.

      fFor pete's sake, the kid's got the knowledge of what to do and how to do it. when he gets out, he will (as so many have) continue in their previous routine of 'sploiting and IP-scanning.

      i'm not damning him (or anyone, fFor that matter) but the nature of the beast is that he will very likely get out, and continue doing just as he had in the past.

      but maybe i'm wrong. what do i know.

    3. Re:but.. by O · · Score: 0

      dude, what is with your "f"s being "fF"? I just don't get it.

      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
  27. Mafiaboy was crying like a baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ..I heard that he started crying like a baby when the judge pronounced his sentence. What a fucking pansy...

    1. Re:Mafiaboy was crying like a baby... by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

      That was due to the fact that he won't be able to get laid at prom. ;-P

      --


      Um, this is my sig.
    2. Re:Mafiaboy was crying like a baby... by JohnSmith1138 · · Score: 1

      He will get laid in juvey though, if that is any consolation.....

    3. Re:Mafiaboy was crying like a baby... by Computer! · · Score: 1

      What a fucking pansy...

      That means a lot, coming from an AC.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    4. Re:Mafiaboy was crying like a baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a geek, and a supremely stupid one at that. What makes you think he'd have a chance?

    5. Re:Mafiaboy was crying like a baby... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for Quebec, but in Saskatchewan we don't have "proms". We do however have the graduation dance/hugeass illegal drunken barn dance parties that are sponsored by the government.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  28. bah! cane the wanker by quackPOT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think a public caning and the revoking of his access to computers for a year or two would be better. If more people got an ass beating for being a punk, I think it would have a better effect than locking them up with other criminals.

  29. That's not too easy a sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please... its not as if he caused the billions of dollars in damage that those sites claimed. Oh no, they were down for an hour!

  30. Perspective, please. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not going to say what Mafia Boy did was right. You can justify it however you wish or let the courts decide (which they have).

    I will say this: Let the punishment fit the crime.

    I did a small stint in a "work farm/community service" facility for something stupid I did a long time ago. Heh, you'd be surprised how much a loss of freedom of only a month will affect you.

    I gained no insight besides one: even the most intelligent person is capable of doing the stupidest things.
    It's ok to do something stupid, just learn from your mistakes.

    Moose.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Perspective, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the stupidest people are also capable of thinking they're the most intelligent. Hubris and youth go hand in hand.

    2. Re:Perspective, please. by damiam · · Score: 1
      I will say this: Let the punishment fit the crime.

      How 'bout we DDOS him for a while? Have people keep calling his name and then saying "never mind".

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  31. Wrists? by NevDull · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's not his wrist I'd like to see slapped. It's his ass by the balls of someone who's not going to take his arrogant shit, but shove it farther into him.

    1. Re:Wrists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not his wrist I'd like to see slapped. It's his ass by the balls of someone who's not going to take his arrogant shit, but shove it farther into him."

      If that's what you want to see, I'm sure you can find plenty of ball-slapping action at your local video store.

  32. Easy Sentence??? What? by Wire+Tap · · Score: 1
    The other message is that even if you get caught, your sentence will be ridiculously easy.

    You are calling 8 MONTHS in a correctional facility an EASY sentence for a youth? 8 months out of any person's life is a significant portion, but for a youth it could be extremely harmfull, as he is still open to so much influence.

    --

    Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

  33. Kids these days.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8 months for damage costing $1.8 billion

    Kid should be hung by his scrotum....

  34. Bah! by sys$manager · · Score: 2, Troll
    Bah! I say to all of you! If you don't want to go to jail, DON'T BREAK THE LAW!

    It only makes sense to me!

    1. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, only stupid people should be punished for breaking the law, not smart ones! (hmm, if they are so smart, why did they break the law?)

      If someone uses a gun to kill someone, they should be punished, but if they are creative, and use a spoon or spatula to kill them, then they should be hired by Betty Crocker, since they obviously have cooking skills.

    2. Re:Bah! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Bah! I say to all of you! If you don't want to go to jail, DON'T BREAK THE LAW!
      Which law? The DMCA???
    3. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Bah! I say to all of you! If you don't want to go to jail, DON'T BREAK THE LAW!

      Ok, fine by me. But then this apply to everyone and I'm pretty sure about everyone did something against the law at least once in his life.

      eg:
      - pirating music, software or video (can you say you don't have any mp3 or divX; or a illegal copy of that nice 2500 dollars programm?)
      - speeding (you endanger other people's life)
      - even riding to the local garage with a broken carlight is a fellony, even when go there to let it fix !!

      But then again, who cares about any criminal activities when there still are 15 year olds playing around on the net?

  35. He was arrogant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those of us who actually know him, he was/is an arrogant little prick and he got what he deserved.

    1. Re:He was arrogant by Karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know if this is true or not, but that's what I figured.

      I picture most people like this (the DDOS ppl) to be arrogant, anti-social pricks. They for some reason feel that just b/c they can do something to others that it gives them the right. I think he got what he deseved, and hopefully the system will work in this case and he will regret his anti-social behavior.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
  36. Easy? ... yea let's put taco in one for 8 months by disc-chord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I spent 4 months in the San Jose Juvi. I was not a total geek, but I sure as hell was not a gang-banger... which is exactly what everyone else was in there. I only got into one fight, but fights are the least of your worries. Try to imagine what it's like to be surrounded by murderers and rapists all day long. I will assume that he is relatively bright, and will have to deal with being in a confined space with people who are not only ignorant and poorly educated, but also very intolerant of educated-types.

    4 months was way too long for me, 8 months would be an eternity. Granted... he will likely not have to deal with the sort of racism I faced (I was 1 of 4 white people, our of 600) in San Jose, but he is definetly not getting off easy.

  37. DDOS attacks anybody? by Anopheles · · Score: 1

    I suppose this sentencing has something to do with the SIN-flood attacks hitting my school right now. It's disrupted one of our classes today... Anybody else get hit by some luser h@x()r script kiddies who were bored during study hall?

  38. Gotta agree with everyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who said getting 8 months is not getting his wrist slapped or rediculously easy.

    Sounds like it really really sucks to me.

  39. 8 months is severe by Canadian Law by myamid · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just wanted to point out that By canadian Juvenile law, the 8 month sentence plus probation the kid got is quite severe! And let's not forget that Yahoo, eBay and company never even bothered to try and prove during the trial that they suffered any losses at all!! I guess they figured out they wouldn't get any of their money back... What's a judge to do? Give 5 years when nobody's really complaining??

    1. Re:8 months is severe by Canadian Law by cascadefx · · Score: 1
      I say punish the parents as well. Seems to me that a punk-ass kid like this should have had some decent parenting to guard against his crime in the first place.

      I know I was more scared of my father than I was of juvi when I was a kid. Where were this kids parents in all of this?

      It speaks to the whole lack of parenting, a sort of disconnect, when it comes to technology. Pre-Internet-Explosion, you heard of teen girls running off with 40 year old men that the parents had never heard of. When asked how this could be, the parents explained that their daughter had her own phoneline and they never knew who she was talking to. The same goes for the Internet and computers. You have all these kids working on stuff totally unsupervised and the parents think it is great that johnny is gaining computer skills.

      You'd supervise your kid if they were at an amusement park. Wouldn't you? But somehow this disconnect sinks in and parents don't think that junior could be bringing down major businesses from thier "harmless" machines.

      It's funny, too. Every book I have read about kids and the Internet suggests supervision over filters. Put the computer in a public place and learn to recognize what junior is doing on it. Be interactive and don't assume that all is well. I totally agree with this stance. Besides filters are easy to bypass and none of them keep junior out of Juvi.

      I told all of this stuff to my uncle when his family "took the plunge" and got Internet access (if you can call AOL "Internet access"). I told him of the things that a curious kid on a computer could get into and that supervision is about the only way to avoid a knock on the door from the FBI or my cousins (4 curious and, how should I say, "trouble gifted" boys) stumbling onto things (or actively seeking them out) that their parents might not want them being exposed to. Their reaction? Put the computer into a private room, facing the only door, in a cabinet that obscures the view of the monitor unless you take a lot of effort to get back behind the user. ALT-Tab and its almost like nothing is going on.

      In my opinion, that's not the smartest way to educate your kids on the proper use of the technology, thereby leaving that education up to whoever (or whatever) they come across online.

  40. And what exactly ... by Sea+Monkey · · Score: 1

    would you know about youth detention centers?

    "The other message is that even if you get caught, your sentence will be ridiculously easy"

  41. nice double standard.. by _Mustang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking back to stories and posts about these types of offenders leads me to believe there is a serious double standard around here.

    Think back and you'll remember everyone complaining that Kevin Mitnick received too harsh a sentence for his hacking/cracking actitivies. I even recall some posters mentioning that a rape/murder gets less time than Kevin's sentence. That was for an adult - maybe even the adult who is considered the *definitive* hacker's hacker, cracker's cracker and such; but that sentence was perceived as totally out of line.
    Now we get this teen ager who is pretty much the poster child definition for the term "script kiddie" and a sentence of 8-9 months in juvie is too light a sentence..

    Seems to me that the sentence should fit the crime. What he did is really the equivalent of spray painting the front of the local wal-mart - vandalism for sure but hardly a capital crime; he got a reasonable sentence.

    1. Re:nice double standard.. by Pez69 · · Score: 1

      You must remember, different country, different criminal law. Plus being a minor he is protected, well sort of by the youth affenders act.

      --

      Forever live the fighters!
    2. Re:nice double standard.. by alexjohns · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A lot of people were upset about the fact that Kevin Mitnick sat in jail for 4 years without a trial. Due process and all that. If he'd gotten a speedy trial and all that, I think fewere people would have been upset. It showed the rest of us how easy it is for 'The Man' to do whatever he wants to us. That's the lesson most of us learned from Mitnick.

      It's also a different country. Contrary to popular belief, Canada is not the 51st state.

    3. Re:nice double standard.. by cascadefx · · Score: 1
      As has been pointed out. The outrage over Kevin Mitnick centered on the fact that he had no due process. Many people thought that he should go to trial and serve time, if a jury so decided. However, Mitnick never got a trial... he just had a bail hearing. Every time the trial got near, it ended up being pushed back... for four years.

      Seems like false imprisonment (never tried or sentenced) and lack of due process to me.

    4. Re:nice double standard.. by camusflage · · Score: 2

      Think back and you'll remember everyone complaining that Kevin Mitnick received too harsh a sentence for his hacking/cracking actitivies.

      Big difference here... Mitnick was held for four years before seeing a trial. Let's hear it for the sixth amendment ("speedy trial", and all that jazz).

      Further, Mitnick's "economic damages" are farcical at best. Mafiaboy, script kiddie that he was, chose to take down Yahoo, Ebay, Amazon, and Dell. Mitnick peeked at AT&T's source, and stole some calling cards. Mafiaboy knocked the primary sales channel for several companies out. Mitnick was (ostensibly) driven by the challenge. Mafiaboy was out to screw companies over.

      What he did is really the equivalent of spray painting the front of the local wal-mart

      Only if the act of spray painting the local one closed down every Wal-Mart across the country for a few days.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  42. H4X0RZ by Kengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    h3110 l4mUrz,

    1 4m a 15 yr 0ld h4X0r/cr4ckX0r, 4nd i th3nk th4t t3h s3nt1nce r1lly SUXX0RZ!!! i 4m more s/\/\a4tur then 4ll j00 0lde phart PUNKX0r S1S-4DMINZ c0mbinde!#% JOO PH33R MY 5K33LZ, i w1ll p1ngn00k joo and fr4ggX0r jur ARSE in c0uNtArStRiEk!!! i am 1337.. 4LL J00R B4S3 R B3L0NGZ 2 US!!!!!

    ---===[[[{{{N33T-0 31337-0}}}]]]===--- [xRc]

    PHR33 MAPHIAB0Y!!!!!

    /s

    /save

    /exit

    /qut

    /quit

    h0w do i sa3v? th3si sint pien!!$ GRR!! greppin tarball

    1. Re:H4X0RZ by cnkeller · · Score: 2

      You know, with the all the trauma going around the US now, I read this and just had to laugh. Thanks....

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    2. Re:H4X0RZ by Karn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is about how 90% of the people in Cstrike talk. Very sad.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    3. Re:H4X0RZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any sort of Babelfish-type service which includes 133t5p34k as one of its languages?

    4. Re:H4X0RZ by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      I pretty much think people use l33t-sp34k these days simply because they find it funny, it is kinda gamers (script kiddies r w4nk3rz) only language, i don't think there is anything worng with using it sparingly for humor, in games. I frequently use it in Q3.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    5. Re:H4X0RZ by ashpool7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google. :)

      http://www.google.com/preferences?hl=xx-hacker

      Yes, I laughed my ass off too....

  43. law enforcement by aozilla · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    And I say the government should stop spending their time protecting rich companies from their own stupidity and start protecting citizens from being killed. Poor poor Ebay lost a few million of fucking business. Let's stop people from killing each other before we worry about such things.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    1. Re:law enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Fuck all of those people that want food, because working to earn money is stupid!
      Kill yourself, the world will be a better place.

    2. Re:law enforcement by aozilla · · Score: 2

      Corporations don't eat.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    3. Re:law enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those **** companies employ thousands of people and make truckloads of goodies that the average person wants/needs. Why should the companies, their employees and shareholders loose out to some little maladjusted jerk who was just showing off ? What if one of this attacks damaged the bottom line sufficiently so that a company with hundreds of employees went belly up ? People lose jobs because of these sorts of losses, investors loose part of their retirement money, etc. all for some little twerp out for a wank.

      Your "argument" is akin to saying that if we can't enforce one law perfectly we might not enforce any. If we can't convict all the crims, then why convict any ?

    4. Re:law enforcement by aozilla · · Score: 1

      What if one of this attacks damaged the bottom line sufficiently so that a company with hundreds of employees went belly up?


      What if it did? Are you claiming that having these laws makes it impossible for that to happen? These attacks are not only possible regardless of the law, they can be done completely anonymously if executed properly. If one of these attacks damaged the bottom line of a company with hundreds of employees, chances are that insurance would pay for it. The money saved in taxes could easily go into the insurance premiums, and the insurance companies could enforce rules which force companies to enact much better security procedures. Most importantly, the insurance would be optional, so I don't have to pay to police Microsoft's servers, if I don't want the protection of my own.


      I don't mind my tax money going to protect people from physical harm, but I do have a big problem with my tax money going to protect corporations from their own stupidity.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  44. Juvenile by Monte · · Score: 0, Troll

    Folks, he's a kid. In the U.S. and Canada children (&lt18) have a different set of laws that apply to them. Check out this site, where I found the following:

    Generally, the maximum prison sentence for a young offender is two years. It goes up to a maximum ofthree years for offences that could be punishable (for an adult) by life imprisonment, and for first degree murder it is now ten years, up to six years of which can be in an institution, with the remainder served in the community under supervision. For second degree murder, the total sentence can be up to seven years, with up to four years of it being served in the institution.

    The idea is that a kid gets leeway because he's not mature enough to understand the consequnces of his actions. So stop wringing your hands about how he got off light, all kids get off light unless they're tried as adults.

    The message to script kiddies is simple: Do it while you're young! Don't wait until your 18th birthday!

  45. save time/money, jail all the kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't forget to investigate your chances of acquiring this URL (including a year's free web hosting), from us. then, if need be, during quiet times, you could "vandalize" your very own WebSite.

  46. Compared to Chinese Hackers... by SilverThorn · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there something in the news several months ago about some Chinese hackers there were sentenced to like death for breaking into a bank and stealing money? Although this kid did cause over 1 billion dollars in damages, sentencing a 'script kiddie' to jail/probation and a small fine seems a bit stupid and prob should be re-examined in the future.

    -- M

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
    1. Re:Compared to Chinese Hackers... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      I believe that the Chinese hackers sentenced to death were employees of the bank. It was embezzlement -- an inside job. The government there knows that they have a reputation for being corrupt, and minor employees like these are disposable when it comes to appeasing the people -- especially if they a happened to be having an anti-corruption Strike Hard campaign.

      This kid didn't do that much more than the equivalent of wide-scale vandalism and blocking traffic -- interfering with trade, and all that. 8 months, as long as it includes education and counseling, doesn't seem unfair to me, barring a serious prior record or other compelling evidence that he won't reform.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  47. Variation on a theme by shine · · Score: 0


    667 "one up" on the beast.

    It's yours to keep if you one two!

  48. What a contradiction. by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What does the outside world think of slashdot when one day everyone is yelling that Dmitry Sklyarov should be set free even though he violated the DMCA and created and sold illegal software. Then the next day a 17 year old script kiddy who DOS attacked a few sites and got a punishment of 8 months in a detention center, and everyone is angry that his punishment isn't enough? How could the common person get any understanding what slashdot's ideology is?

    1. Re:What a contradiction. by dstone · · Score: 2

      How could the common person get any understanding what slashdot's ideology is?

      That's a good observation. I don't think the common person will ever get what special interest groups like slashdot are all about. That's why it will continue to be News for Nerds. This is a safe gathering place for nerds, where you don't need to dumb stuff down to interface or share with the "common" world. It's all good for us.

    2. Re:What a contradiction. by a42 · · Score: 2
      What contradiction exactly?

      As far as /. can be said to have an ideology I would say that it is obvious:

      The DMCA is wrong.

      What Mafiaboy did was wrong.

      What do the two things have to do with each other?

    3. Re:What a contradiction. by room101 · · Score: 2

      while you raise a good point, you must understand that there is no slashdot ideology. Ever heard the phrase, hearding cats? It applies here very well.

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    4. Re:What a contradiction. by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      CT is still a young man, and likely doesn't have a unifying ideology himself. That carries through to this site.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:What a contradiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He created software THAT WAS LEGAL IN RUSSIA, WHERE IT WAS PRODUCED! That's like you drinking a beer in the U.S., then going and visiting a hardline religious country where Alcohol is banned and getting arrested for having that beer in the U.S...

    6. Re:What a contradiction. by kaisyain · · Score: 2

      No, I've never herd that one.

    7. Re:What a contradiction. by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well besides the fact that many posters don't consider the 8 months detention too little, we also don't think of those two "crimes" the same way. To me, the only similarity is that computers are involved.

      Sklyarov was the victim of a misguided and unjust law. He didn't actually do anything to any company, the way MafiaBoy did.

      A DoS attack is an actual disruption of business, I have no problem with fair justice for that. Writing a general-purpose program to decode files is different. We don't throw people in jail for writing "ping" which may be used as a DoS tool, and we shouldn't throw them in jail for writing a program that decodes computer files in the privacy of your own home!

    8. Re:What a contradiction. by JohnSmith1138 · · Score: 1

      Because it is apples and oranges even if the non-techies can't understand that. DoS attacking major sites is illegal for good reason and should be punished. The acts of this week show this. The internet was some of our only sources of good information and images of what was happening in New York and anything that would disrupt that is wrong.

      Dmitry is accused of going against the DMCA which most here would agree is seriously flawed. While the intent of the DMCA is good, to protect copyrighted works (no flame wars on that, I understand not everyone agrees with this), I think we all understand that it's execution is too broad. Check here for more information.

      Fundamentaly what Dmitry did is not wrong and what Mafiaboy hackerpants did is.

    9. Re:What a contradiction. by room101 · · Score: 2

      actually, more like making beer in the US (not a crime), then taking it to said "hardline religous country where Alcohol is banned", and trying to sell it. Yes, you will get arrested there.

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    10. Re:What a contradiction. by sysv · · Score: 0
      Your totaly wright.

      I think the company's should spend more time on there security, and less time looking for people to sue.

      Sorry for the speling mistakes, If you don't like it, don't read my posting

    11. Re:What a contradiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't here to market the software, and, AFAIK, it's not marketed in the US at all. The whole beer metaphor is getting stretched rathout of of shape :P

      Whether to light for the crime or not, Mafiaboys sentence is quite light by the standards of other convicted computer "hackers" - Randal Shwartz is an excellent example (www.stonehenge.com for some details)

    12. Re:What a contradiction. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      ... there is no slashdot ideology.


      Of course there is:

      1. Taco can't write
      2. Jon Katz sucks
      3. Bad speling and gramer rulz


      Of course, I subscribe to none of these tenets :-).

      --
      That is all.
    13. Re:What a contradiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Sklyarov did was only illegal under an already illegal/unjust law, the DMCA. If Congress declared breathing oxygen to be illegal, should the entire human race be considered to be doing something wrong?

      What Mafiaboy did was wrong under legit laws.

    14. Re:What a contradiction. by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      Well here's what my mother would ask me:

      "They're both hackers that broke the law, how are they any different?"

      Try answering that one to somebody who doesn't do much besides Solitaire on a computer.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    15. Re:What a contradiction. by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Well, I think you're a clever troll, but your question bears answering.

      Most slashdot readers generally will agree that there should be a law against DDOS attacks. However, they also agree that the DMCA should not exist, as it is overly harsh, unfair, and quite possibly an unconstitutional piece of legislation.

      When Mafiaboy attacked, everyone said "There aughta be a law!"
      When Dmitry Sklyarov was arrested, everyone said that the law had no right to exist.

      Fair?

    16. Re:What a contradiction. by cburley · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Here's something to try out on your mother:

      "A man pushes an elderly woman, injuring her. That's against the law. Should he be jailed?"

      Now, if her answer is "yes", ask her whether it makes any difference that he pushed her out of the way of an oncoming truck.

      If her answer was "it depends", explain to her that, to some of us, a programmer explaining just how poor security actually is in a widely-distributed app that is advertised as offering security is much more like the man pushing a woman out of the way of an oncoming truck than someone hacking into web sites and shutting them down.

      Indeed, Mafiaboy (I gather) did something much more like pushing an elderly woman into the path of an oncoming truck. One can claim that he did this to draw attention to the fact that old ladies and big scary trucks are not a good combination on our roads, but the fact remains that there are many other, valid, ways to illustrate the same thing without shutting somebody's valid business down (the equivalent of shoving unendangered old ladies around in this analogy).

      Dmitry, on the other hand, might have had a few alternatives, but he was doing nothing remotely near violating fundamental ethical or moral principles of our society -- unless you're getting moral and ethical guidance from the likes of Jack Valenti and Hilary Rosen, that is.

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    17. Re:What a contradiction. by Snootch · · Score: 1

      The answer is that there is no unifying /. ideology - even the famed pro-linux, anti-Microsoft bias is now complete rot - say something pro-OSS and you get at flamed far more rabidly than if you'd taken a pro-MS stance.

      Also, the DMCA is generally held around here to be an unjust situation (Oh crap, I just contradicted myself, didn't I? Well, on *most* subjects there's no such thing as a cohesive /. ideology), whereas depriving a firm of profits and generally making havoc is generally regarded as bad.

    18. Re:What a contradiction. by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      How could the common person get any understanding what slashdot's ideology is?

      Yes! Everyone, please. Pick a pigeonhole into which every last user on slashdot can be conveniently grouped, and then ensure that your posts never deviate from that philosophy.

      Dealing with a collection of people who have different values is too confusing.

    19. Re:What a contradiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He attended a public conference in America and detailed ways to bypass copyright control. The law is wrong, but what he did was illegal, since he was in America when he gave the talk.

  49. Easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Easy? Easy?

    He got fined CDN$250!!!! That's, what, 1/2 the Gross National Product of Canada?

  50. Globe and Mail Article by tb3 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's another article from the Globe And Mail that has a little more detail, and describes the terms of his parole.

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  51. Lets look at the figures by Jeff+Knox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets look at the figures of damage supposedly caused by Mafiaboy and see if he deserves a rewards, not a prison sentance. The estimated figure of damage was 1.3Billion combined from eBay, Yahoo, and Amazon. Lets first look at revenue and losses of these companies. They dont make any profit, which is what will be my point. This information has been culled from finance.yahoo.com (Interesting how yhoo's profile on finance.yahoo.com is more flavorly and flattering then any other stocks).

    Yahoo (per http://biz.yahoo.com/p/y/yhoo.html )

    "For the six months ended 6/30/01, revenues decreased 28% to $362.4 million.
    "Net loss totaled $60 million vs. an income of $120.9 million."

    Ok. So in the first six months of this year they only had revenue of 362.4 million, and had a Net Loss of 60 million. Devide 60 million by (365/2/2, or 91.25, a figure for a half a day of revenue) and you get $657,534 dollars of Losses they did not have because their site was down. So in this case Yahoo loss 3.97 million in revenues, which would of resulted in $657,534 of losses. So Mafiaboy saved Yahoo $657,534 in all reality.

    eBay (per http://biz.yahoo.com/p/e/ebay.html )

    "For the six months ended 6/30/01, revenues rose 82% to $335 million."
    "Net income totaled $45.7 million, up from $9.2 million."

    Ok. So eBay is making a profit. So revenue losses in ebays case is very similar to yahoo at $3.67 million. And actually profit losses are $500,822. So their is real loss associated with his attack. $500,822 dollars in eBay's case (if at all, because in reality, the auctions still went on, and eBay still collected all their fees).

    Amazon.com (per http://biz.yahoo.com/p/a/amzn.html )

    "For the the six months ended 6/30/01, revenues increased 19% to $1.37 billion"
    "Net loss before acct. change fell 37% to $392 million."

    Amazon has a significantly higher revenue then eBay and Yahoo as we see. So revenue loss for that half day would be 15million. Net loss Amazon.com was saved from that 15 million, $4.3million.

    Summary

    Adding up the total half day losses of revenue for all the companies equals $22.64 million in loss revenue. Of that $4.96 million would of been losses, and only $500,822 thousand would be profit. So the net amount of money it could be considered that Mafiaboy saved these three companies is 4.45million dollars. If you add up the half year revenues of these companies it was only around 2 billion. And thats for HALF A YEAR. Amazon.com accounting for most of that. No way Mafiaboy caused 1.3 billion in damage, not matter how you look at it. I know their is more then revenue, such as employees over time and whatnot. But still looking at the figures 23 million of damage at best (because no one can say these companies actually ended up loosing sales, and in eBays case, it probably did not have much of a effect if any), or looking at it from another viewpoint, you could say Mafiaboy saved these companies over 4 million dollars.

    PS. Dont take this as an approval of Mafiaboys actions. What he did was wrong, no matter what way you look at it.

    --
    Jeff Knox
    1. Re:Lets look at the figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, he prevented losses by wasting their bandwidth and preventing sales in the face of expenditures like electricity, employees, etc.
      Yup, all of those costs of operating those sites DISAPPEARED because people could no longer GIVE THEM MONEY.

      Apparently as part of your basic math classes they never stressed CRITICAL THINKING.

    2. Re:Lets look at the figures by Jeff+Knox · · Score: 1

      Thats not what I am say. I am saying the figure can no where equal 1.3billion or more for half a day of down time. I addressed those additional cost, and said even if they were considered, the figure would not equal 1.3billion. The purpose of the analysis was to go over loss of revenues, not total business loss. Even if all cost were able to be accounted for, the figure in no way would equal 1.3billion for half a day. Even if you take in to consideration electricity and employees (half a day of employees for all these companies is only at most a couple mil, IF THAT). Anyway, the point was to show their is no way a figure of 1.3billion could be considered, when revenue for those companies (which PAYS for those other expenditures) is not even close to that figure. The 6 months revenue of these companies is only slightly over the half day loss figures. Once again, that revenue pays for the cost of operations, so I think just analyzing revenue figures is a good measure real losses. Their is some critical thinking for you.

      --
      Jeff Knox
  52. Re:HACK THE PLANET by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    ...so then, I hear on the news this morning, that some ATM in, like, Iowa or something, just started spitting money out into the street! That was me...I did that

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  53. Hypocrisy by Lagos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's pretty sad to see this kind of hypocrisy on Slashdot. The dichotomy between the attitude towards "Script Kiddies" and the attitude towards those considered truely elite is disgusting: Hackers are met with sympathy and understanding; script kiddies almsot face a lynch-happy slashdot posse.

    He's a minor. I think 8 months is sufficent.

    1. Re:Hypocrisy by issachar · · Score: 2
      can you please explain why being a minor means he should be held fully responsible for his actions?

      are you suggesting that a 17 year old isn't capable of coprehending the consequences of his actions? That's a big steaming pile. They most certainly are, and they should be held responsible like any other human being.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    2. Re:Hypocrisy by Lyka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to defend the hypocrisy involved, but I think the significant factor here may be that this was a DOS attack. Many consider DOS's the most contemptible form of vandalism -- something like throwing a big pile of rubble in the middle of a busy freeway for the fun of it, as opposed to spraypainting your name on a wall.

    3. Re:Hypocrisy by p3d0 · · Score: 2

      are you suggesting that a 17 year old isn't capable of coprehending the consequences of his actions?

      Yep.

      I think you'd have to be 17 years old to really think that 17-year-olds know anything about the world.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:Hypocrisy by issachar · · Score: 1

      Now that's just silly.

      (and I'm 25)

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    5. Re:Hypocrisy by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for you if you haven't learned anything in the last 8 years. :-)

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  54. I don't think he did it by smutt · · Score: 1

    I remember when this shit went down, and I remember when they arrested Mafiaboy. I think they ended up arresting Mafiaboy because of something he said on IRC, but the truth of the matter is that the authorities have absolutely no idea who launched those DOS attacks. Mafiaboy was just the easiest target.

    --
    The Information Revolution will be fought on the command line.
    1. Re:I don't think he did it by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      he pleaded guilty.

  55. Re:SOMEBODY MOD PARENT UP! by MatthewLovelace · · Score: 0

    Oh, that site? I'd never mention that, especially not while eating lunch.

    --

    ******
    "What makes you think I care about your opinions?"

  56. We used to call that "foot hockey"..... by Vic · · Score: 1

    ....back in elementary school. I don't know why we didn't just call it "soccer". ;-)

    -Vic

  57. Easy Sentance by antistuff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of my friends served a year in a so called "detention center". I say so called becouse it just a prision for kids. He got into fights everyday and go the shit kicked out of him. 8 months might not sound like a lot, but dont think thats its easy becouse you have never been there.

  58. Agreed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8 months locked away with other troubled youth is not a wrist slap. I can't say wether it is more or less than deserved considering...


    Oh fuck, let me cut it short. 8 months sentence for a prank that did no physical harm is not a wrist slap. I don't know what you were expecting exactly, perhaps he should have had is hands sawn off? Because you couldn't get to fscking Yahoo that day? Oh no!


    Get some perspective. Jesus H. Christ, look around you, the planet's falling apart. And you're railing against some punk kid who disrupted traffic on a network of computers.

    1. Re:Agreed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the crime was committed through a computer doesn't mean it didn't do any harm. The number of people's lives he distrupted and the economic cost of his actions was huge.

  59. what about a record? by issachar · · Score: 2, Troll
    I'm not 100% sure, but I think that because of his age, he gets his record wiped clean later. (You basically have to murder many people to make a permanent mark on your record when you're 17 in Canada).

    Now that sucks! Anything like that should be a permanent part of your record. That's part of the problem with idiot teens like this. They know darn well that basically anything they do before 18 doesn't get punished or have any permanent consequences. (Course most are too stupid to stop when they turn 18).

    Canada needs to ditch the Young Offenders Act and get something with some teeth. 'course I've been saying this since I was 15, but those bleeding heart idiots WHO LET TERRORISTS IN BECAUSE THEY WHINE THAT THEY'RE REFUGEES, aren't ever going to do anything.

    --
    . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    1. Re:what about a record? by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LET TERRORISTS IN BECAUSE THEY WHINE THAT THEY'RE REFUGEES

      Whoa there cowboy! A little evidence please? And what would you suggest we do with the refugees who face persecution in their homelands (women from Afghanistan, for instance)? Turn them around and send them home? I realize you're upset about what happened on Tuesday, but please keep the hatred away from off-topic subjects.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    2. Re:what about a record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WHO LET TERRORISTS IN BECAUSE THEY WHINE THAT THEY'RE REFUGEES

      Wether this is true or not I don't know but at least we don't train them to fly airplanes.

    3. Re:what about a record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Canada needs to ditch the Young Offenders Act and get something with some teeth.

      Sounds like you're from that retarded country called USA?

    4. Re:what about a record? by issachar · · Score: 1

      read my bio if you want to know where I'm from.

      and if you think your (fellow?) Canadians (i.e. ME) are going to tolerant this whiny pathetic jealousy that manifests itself as anti-Americanism anymore you've got another thing coming.

      I love Canada. Really, I do, but we've been resting on our laurals too long and taking cheap shots at the most democratic country in the world because we've got an inferiority complex.

      I grew up making jokes about Americans, I got tired of it when I left high school. Now it offends me.

      Sorry this is slightly off topic, but I'm still embarassed by my Country's weak response to NY. Look at Britain's reaction, now THAT'S what true friends and allies do.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
  60. seems fair to me by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    Seems fair, maybe even excessive. He didn't break into the systems, he didn't steal confidential data, he didn't risk life and physical property, he just denied some traffic to websites.

    Imagine someone dropping a tree or something across a major highway, and stopping traffic.. would we add up the lost business from these people not reaching their destinations, and then punish the perpetrator based on that?

    The punishment should fit the crime. It's easy for a small action to have great consequence on the internet, but that doesn't necessarily mean we should inflate punishments proportionately.

    1. Re:seems fair to me by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

      Seems fair, maybe even excessive.

      I cocncur. What was his crime? Being a dick. Now as much as I hate dicks, 8 months does seem liek a long time for this. I think they should have just let the CEO's of all the companies he harassed take turns kicking him in the nuts or punching him in the gut. That seems a tad more apropos.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  61. Sentence to light???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK here are the facts as I see them:

    Kid played script kiddie on Ebay using avalible tools.

    Kig gets caught and EVERYBODY in the IT community knows his name.

    Sentenced to 8 months in Kiddie jail (These are not nice places adult men can at least have some composure in jail juvinials are wild animals in comparison) And 1 year probation.

    This is a bit considering he didn't hurt anybody. As to people saying no computer access thats BS my PS/2 has more computing power than my first PC and I could run Linux on it. Computers are not an option anymore for most people they are a necesity just like cars. For those that thing drunk drivers should loose there licence when they never injured anybody but themselves I'd say why dont you make sure they cant drink a special liscences that says no bar entrance everyplaces cards anyway and they should.

    From the sounds of it the kid needs an engaging intern job somewhere not mcdonalds.

  62. A wrist slap is all he should receive! by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Get some frickin' perspective.

    Exactly what losses can a company claim when they are victim of a DOS attack? Damaged hardware? No. Theft of goods? No. The only "loss" one of these companies had is potential income for that short period of time. And even that is completely subjective. Realistically, if you were going to buy a book from Amazon and you couldn't get to their web site, chances are you'd just try again in a few hours. The same goes for all the other web sites - especially the portals. Would you change your home page if the site was down for a couple hours?

    Also, consider that this was a 16 year old boy. For Christ's sake, do you remember how stupid you were when you were 16? How much time do you think a kid should serve for a foolish mistake that didn't really harm anyone?

    1. Re:A wrist slap is all he should receive! by alexjohns · · Score: 2
      Realistically, if you were going to buy a book from Amazon and you couldn't get to their web site, chances are you'd just try again in a few hours.
      If I want to buy a book now and I can't get to Amazon, I'll go to a different bookseller. Borders, B&N, Fatbrain, whatever. No way I'd wait 'til Amazon came back up.

      I think it would be easy to prove loss of income on Amazon's part. Take the period of time they were DOS'd, plot numbers/$ sold in that time period to same period in previous days/weeks/months. Easy as pie - or a pie chart (or some other kind of chart.) Statistically, it should be very straightforward.

      Trouble is, Mafiaboy has no money for them to recoup. Aside from that, you tend not to get money from a criminal trial, only a civil one. They can still sue him in civil court.

  63. Its not the juvie time thats tough but.... by chronos2266 · · Score: 1

    The 1 year probation, script kiddying is like crack.

  64. Practising Law Without A License: @# +1 ; Legal #@ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "that even if you get caught, your sentence will be ridiculously easy."

    Perhaps, the American Bar Association would be
    interested in your IANAL advice.

  65. Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll ass-rape cmdrtaco for 8 months and when I'm thru you can ask him how easy it was

  66. Finally by qqtortqq · · Score: 1

    I really think we are seeing a fitting punishment for computer crimes finally. This was not overreaction, he did cause a lot of financial damage to the web sites he DDOS'd. This was not underreaction either, he didn't go to the server rooms of these places and plant bombs. Now if we can get persons who break into computers who deliberately do NO damage, just explore, or even deface the web page without rm'ing the index.html, to get fair sentences, things will be on the right track. rm -rf /bin/laden

  67. WHAT??? by d3ltaspy · · Score: 1

    What he did was lame - to run a DDoS on a server... Even among hackers... that is lame... Defacing websites, like the PentaGuard, for a purpose, to give out a message, that's more acceptable, that's how you prove you are smart... Or if you down't want attention, once you get in, send an e-mail to the admin, saying that you found a hole in the security... That's how you could get hired... If you get in and do malicious stuff... they know you are a criminal... and THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS... CRIMINALS ARE CRIMINALS... Teenagers (like me) should find other ways to get attention, not carry out DDoS... for all you hackers-wanna-be out there... HACK LEGALLY at hackerslab.org

  68. Young offenders by Shwang_Shwing · · Score: 1

    Canada's justice system is quite lenient on young offendere. Believe it or not he probably would have gotten the same sentence for almost beating a person to death.

    1. Re:Young offenders by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Yeah, maybe our penal code should be closer to the America system, which would have sentanced this kid to five years of anal rape ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H prison.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  69. I went to jail when I was 17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was 17, I committed a pretty serious crime. Noone got hurt, but people could have been.

    I was sentenced to 2 to 4 years in State prison (I was sentenced as an adult). Luckily for me, the experience was mostly boredom, with very little terror.

    I agree with a previous poster that this kid could have a stunted development in his learning, but this all comes down to one thing:
    Did he realize that what he did was wrong, for moral and ethical reasons within himself?

    I have learned that doing something "bad" and getting punished for it is a powerful motivator to improve yourself, IF you want to change. As for learning in jail, it depends on his attitude and how supportive his family is.

    My mother probably sent me over 3000 sheets of info. from the net, and over 100 books during the 2 years 7 months I spent in jail. I learned more in jail than I did in High School! I taught myself x86 assembly, the more advanced features of C++ from Stroustrup's book, and I even wrote the framework of an extensible raytracer (which I am still working on) by correspondance!

    The bad thing is that you can't practice any of it. The moral of my story is: this kid's development depends mostly on himself and his family. He can become incredibly motivated by this, or he can turn into a society-menacing prick.

    Another example is linked to from the atricle, about a kid starting a computer business from jail.

  70. hearding cats by hawk · · Score: 1
    hearding cats is easy; they don't say much except "meow," unless you step on the tail and get a "rowrrrr".


    herding cats is another story . . .


    :)


    hawk

    1. Re:hearding cats by room101 · · Score: 1

      hehehe, damn spelling.

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
  71. H4X0RZ translation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen enough people who are unable to read this type of 'l337 sp34k' before so I'll translate:

    Hello Lamers,

    I am a 15 year old hacker/cracker, and I think that the sentence really sucks. I am more smarter than all you old fart punk sys admins combined. You fear my skills, I will ping nuke you and frag your ass in Counterstrike. I am elite. All your base are belong to us.

    ---===[[[{{ Neato Elite-O }}}]]]===--- [xRc]

    Fear Maphiaboy!!!!!!

    /s

    /save

    /exit

    /qut

    /quit

    How do I save? This isn't pine! Grr!! grepping tarball.

    1. Re:H4X0RZ translation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My translation:

      Hello people.

      I am the lamest, dumbest, most arrogant scum to ever walk this earth.

    2. Re:H4X0RZ translation. by mitheral · · Score: 1
      Fear Maphiaboy!!!!!!


      Shouldn't that be: Free Mafiaboy!!!!!! ?

  72. Light sentence? More like different approach by CaptJay · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The other message is that even if you get caught, your sentence will be ridiculously easy.

    Before judging on a sentence on a juvenile in the province of Quebec, you need a crash course on the approach that is prevalent here with kids, and works very well.

    • Kids are NOT sent to jail. Whatever they commited. Why? Because jail is not where you learn about life as an adult.
    • Juvenile centers are not vacation centers. My mother has been working in one for over 25 years, and the kids are severly watched, and most definitely not free to do what they want. They are locked in their rooms at night, and whenever they cause any kind of trouble. As long as they behave, they get to interact with other kids there, and they are forced to go to school.
    Most of Canada wants tougher laws towards the kids, but Quebec's system has the lowest rate of kids being sentenced that commit other crimes when they grow up. By any means, 8 months is not a light sentence, and the kid will have that time to think about what he did, and perhaps find something else he is good at, instead of thinking how he will make society pay for his incarceration when he gets out of jail.

    --
    "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
  73. The original sentence by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Originally he was sentenced to correct Taco's grammar and spelling for a year, but it was deemed cruel & unusual punishment...

  74. Re:Is this a joke? by d3ltaspy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What do you mean... That was WAR... 1. JAPAN declared war to the US at Pearl Harbor 2. JAPAN attacked the US without any warning 9.11 was an act of war, so we are going to treat it like that... PS You are a COWARD...

  75. You're on crack. by citricacid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slap on the wrist? Exactly how do you call this a 'slap on the wrist'?

    Mafiaboy is a seventeen year old - a teenager, probably misplaced socially - who decided to see what he could do with his computer. What you deride as 'script kiddieism' is nothing more than curiosity travelling its logical path. The only reasons he didn't bury his nose in *nix programming like you probably did is because one, he's young, and two, it's boring.

    This isn't to say he's any sort of innocent. Obviously he has some anger issues or something to work out, and these should be dealt with. Eight months in juvey is going to be a dragging hell for him as it is, and probably won't resolve any of his social aberrancy. It's not just harsh, it's ineffective.

    What would you advise as an alternative to this 'slap on the wrist'? Throw him in prison and let him rot? I have to say, then, that you are one hard motherfucker. His crimes were economic, nonviolent, and those of youth: more annoyances than anything, and ones that show us that . It would immoral to steal his life to pay for what it can't.

    Ideally, he should simply be seperated from technology and forced to work excessively in the community. Make him go out and meet people. Make him help people. This isn't an evil, violent person. Locking him in with his fellow misanthropes is going to help no one.

    --
    . . . . . . . [awg] http://acidwriting.org .. looking for the right words
    1. Re:You're on crack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What you deride as 'script kiddieism' is nothing more than curiosity travelling its logical path.

      ... and what was your IP again?

  76. better training for criminals? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "I say the message should be to the scriptkiddies who obviously don't know how to cover their tracks, to at least learn to do so before they download malicious software."

    So you don't have a problem with the crime, just with the training of the criminals?

  77. a joke by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    When I heard 8 months is all this kid was getting, the guy in the next desk had to ask what I was laughing about. I am surprised the kid did not get up in court and say something like

    I can do that standing on my head

    Now first off, he is not that good a cracker, he got caught. The news is making a big deal about this event at the time it occurred, but if he were good, they would be still hunting him down today.

    Secondly, like the post in slashdot says, he got slapped. Personally I think if you are dumb enough to get caught, then you deserver more the a little slap. But when I heard that they expected that 8 months would be a message to all the script kiddies, I was laughing even harder. So here in an interesting thought then, who is the bigger joke here, the kid for getting caught, or the people thinking this will be a message to all script kiddies.

    my 2 cents plus 2 more

    1. Re:a joke by CaptJay · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So here in an interesting thought then, who is the bigger joke here, the kid for getting caught, or the people thinking this will be a message to all script kiddies.

      Maybe by American standards it is. But by Canadian laws in general, and Quebec's system in particular, it seems appropriate. The funny idea that people have around here is that kids that commit crimes are not yet beyond being brought back on the right track. The juvenile centers here are very supervised, but not by armed guards. The kids are followed by psychologists and educators, forced to go to school and get deprived of some of the few things they have when they get too bad results.

      You may find it funny, but alot of the kids that get put through this find it very hard, and think twice about it. What's more, they can't just hide in their corner forever, they have to open up sooner or later. And not surprisingly to me, alot end up very good citizens afterwards.

      So basically, different countries, different approaches. And I kinda like ours.

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
    2. Re:a joke by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

      Well I agree with you, but one thing, I am up here in Canada to A. I know that these places are not that easy to survive in, and had on kids, but 8 months is still not enough. The Canadian system is just way to easy on the offenders up here in my opinion. I keep up with h news and look at how any people up here are let out of jail so early compared to the sentence they get. Be honest it scares me that we do this

      my 2 cents plus 2 more

  78. Because We're Not Sheep by waldoj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as a surprise as this might be, there is no unifying Slashdot ideology. Being as how we're all capable of free thought, some people believe things that others don't.

    I can't believe that I've had to state something so blindingly obvious.

    -Waldo

  79. eight months is easy? by option8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    certainly it's at a YDC and not at a federal, pound-you-in-the-ass penitentiary, but still, eight months.

    that's a full year of school you'd have to miss, and take again with kids 2 years younger than you. and a year after _that_ you still wouldn't be able to leave the state or be out after curfew.

    imagine you're back in high school, and remember the pain of persecution and social awkwardness of being a geek. add to that the weekly visits to your parole officer, and think that's not at least a little trying for a kid who, essentially, downloaded some software and ran it.

    personally, i think it's light in comparison to the damage and loss of commerce in dollar amounts floating around from the "Attack" - and i hope his parole terms include not being able to use the Internet unsupervised - but considering the age of the of the offender with no priors (i presume) this isn't "ridiculously easy" or a wristslap. a wristslap would be a fine (which his parents have to pay) and maybe parole.

    being confined to a cell, your movements and actions constantly under scrutiny for eight months, essentially without any liberties, is an appropriate sentence for someone who intentionally committed a severe act of vandalism. the travesty would be giving the same sentence, or less, to people who maim or kill while drunk behind the wheel of a car, which happens every day in the courts.

    1. Re:eight months is easy? by CaptJay · · Score: 3, Informative
      that's a full year of school you'd have to miss, and take again with kids 2 years younger than you. and a year after _that_ you still wouldn't be able to leave the state or be out after curfew.


      Actually, in Quebec, that's a full year of school you'll actually be forced by a judge to attend every single of your classes. There is no calling in faking to be sick, the educators at the center know better. Instead of being withdrawn from society, you're being supervised and forced to face it, which gives pretty good results.

      --
      "I remember Y1K, every abacus had to get another bead"
    2. Re:eight months is easy? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      1) This is Canada. Nearly all "juvies" are Federal.
      2) In Canada you are forced to go to school in "juvy"
      3) We don't have states. We have provinces. Difference? Not much except the provinces don't have much power, and can't keep citizens of this country in just one. You can be confined to your city, though. But I think that's been challenged under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (One of the documents that form the Canadian constitution)

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    3. Re:eight months is easy? by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1
      "Instead of being withdrawn from society, you're being supervised and forced to face it, which gives pretty good results."

      This reminds me of the famous Borg warning "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated."

      Eight months in juvenile prison is too harsh. Spending a month as an assistant to a system administrator might have made for a better "slap on the wrist".

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    4. Re:eight months is easy? by CaptWolf · · Score: 1

      Maybe I need a little precision here. In a youth detention center, kids aren't brainwashed, there taught to play nice with there friends. An exemple (to make things ridiculous). If I have an argument with someone, I could either talk with him to prove my point, or take a gun and shoot at him... In a society like ours (Or like I think it should be), everybody should be aware of the fact that a discussion with a good argumentation and the respect of each faction is the base everything AND the great difficulty to be human. Ok, maybe from there you want to know where I'm going with that... What I want you to realize is that it is not a punition that mafiaboy got, it is a lesson of life. Ther, he will have specialist of kids to teach him how to be and to act in a society. I know this is an utopic situation, but this is the way beind a Youth detention center. And beleive me, eight month is nnot that big a time to be followed be psychologist and specialist to teach someone how to get along in society. I know he did not shoot at someone, but nontheless, he must be told that what he does is wrong (just a little slap on the hand and a nice long talk to say :"play nice with your friends...").

  80. no shit sherlock by teambpsi · · Score: 1
    yeah he's from canada, and yeah he was attacking US sites -- where do you think the pressure was from?


    anything else you need to point out in the "bleeding obvious category" ?

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
  81. Well well well, Taco reveals his conservatism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, dude, for revealing your conservative tendencies. You really screwed up. Time to start a new message board, one with a little compassion on it.

  82. it IS easy by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    I hear numerous comments about how the sentence is just, and not ridiculously easy.

    The kid is 17. That's one year (probably not even that) short of an adult, and _well_ into the range of "responsible decision making." Hell, you can drive at 16. If they're gonna give people THAT kind of a responsibility at 16, they sure as hell can endure some harsher punishments at 17.

    I agree with the statement that this is a rather poor message to send the script kiddies. Not saying 8 months is a cakewalk, but DoS'ing a bunch of businesses is NOT comparable to the "simple vandalism" examples people here have been comparing it to. DoS attacks cost businesses ALOT of money. It's not a matter of scrubbing some paint from a wall. Its a huge loss in business.

    I say the kid deserves the sentence and more.

    Magius_AR

  83. take a bunch of idiot lemmings ... by fishfucker · · Score: 0

    toss them together and have them all speak out of turn.

    that's slashdot's ideology.

  84. Taco is what's wrong with America... by rtscts · · Score: 1
    what-a-lame-sentance

    Indeed.
  85. Perhaps Redundant? I doubt it though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "kid" wasn't a "hacker" he was a *script kiddie*, the equvilant of a braggart who thinks he knows something but doesn't.

    A true hacker doesn't use someone else's tools, they write their own.

  86. Perfect execution. by Lumpy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hmm in canada, you do cyber crime and you get punished... This is great! for some reason here in the US you get tortured, sent to prison, smeared, and demolished without even getting to trial...

    I think Canada is treating it's citizens fairly.. while here in the US we just use our Gestapo tactics.

    President Bush said that the WTC attack was an attack on freedom.. and I agree, but it is less of an attack on freedom than the United States Government places every day.... the DCMA destroys freedom faster and with more completeness than any bomb or attack could ever accomplish.

    But american right now are distracted from the real issues of protecting freedom.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  87. Why examples? by Velex · · Score: 1

    What's with make examples out of people anyhow? Is there any reason for such an inconsistent thing other than vagrant emotions? This is very unfair to him, and it does nothing to contribute to justice. There should be a sentence for being an 31337 5kr1p7 k1dd13z, and it should be the same for everything. I don't know jack about Canadian law, but I do know about fairness, and this is not fair.

    Even then, is his sentence proportional to the severity of his crime? Not at all. All he did was generate traffic to a bunch of sites. How is that a crime? If their servers can't handle it, it's their fault, not his. Serving time is for people that need to be out of society for a while -- murderers, rapists, theives, etc. -- but not for generating traffic. These companies' sites are public: if they can't handle getting DoSed, they need better software to handle the traffic.

    Am I saying that DoS attacks are OK? Not exactly. At most what should have happened to him was fines for the attack. The action did have malicious intent and malicious effect, but nothing that deserves living with some of the most screwed up kids you can imagine for two thirds of a year. This is redicilous: he temporarly disabled capital for a day or so -- LIFE GOES ON.

    Not for him, though. I suppose I should know better than to get in the way of people's emotions when mammon is in danger.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  88. What's with this attitude? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0
    Get with it. Liking computers doesn't absolve you from punishment for violating the rights of others.


    Violating the rights of others? Where on Earth do you get that nonsense? How were your rights violated? --By temporarily taking down a public address system he 'violated' the 'right' of business to make money for an afternoon? Your right to use Yahoo's crap search engine? Get real.

    The kid was fifteen. Nobody got hurt, he didn't destroy anything, and he certainly didn't violate anybody's civil rights.

    All he did was make a bunch of big companies look like the idiots that they are and make people feel insecure in the use of a technology nobody should feel secure about in the first place. THAT is why everybody was so upset. He said the emperor had no clothes.

    And frankly, I think he's very, very lucky the law didn't do something truly awful. Are you happy about the 'hackers' who have been dissapeared to jail for years without trial, or were otherwise penalized beyond reason for doing virtually nothing wrong? Would it make you happy to see that happen to this kid?

    I barely understand people these days.


    -Fantastic Lad

  89. Misuse of the word 'hacker' by Salica · · Score: 1

    Once again the word 'hacker' is used instead of 'cracker'...

    Two links to "The Jargon File" for those still ignoring the difference :

    Hacker

    Cracker

    1. Re:Misuse of the word 'hacker' by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      Once again someone indignantly suggests the word 'cracker' where it cannot apply. cracker can mean:
      • a flat, dry biscuit
      • a device for penetrating the shell of a foodstuff
      • a person who gains access to a secured device without being given the code. "Safe-cracker" "Crack the code"

        You can crack into a file. You can crack a password. You can crack into a computer, if you gain the ability to use it for your own purposes.

        But if you impair a system's functioning by overloading it with legitimate requests, its security has NOT been violated.

        (Ok, so as an intermediate step to the DDOS attacks, he had to BackOrifice a bunch of systems. Cracking into them is not what got him arrested- Ebay and Yahoo were not "cracked")

        The definition of hacker in the jargon file is wrong too, btw. Or at least its too long, obscuring the real meaning, which goes back to MIT 70+ years ago (pre-univac!).


        A person who operates a complex system in a manner inconsistent with it's designer's intent


        That neatly summarizes most of the positive definitions. (Although the meaning of "highly skilled programmer", which is your favorite interpretation even though its recent addition, is not strongly attached to the simplified meaning. It comes out of the fact that some programmers are good enough to bang out a working product without stopping to design it first. While this might produce a quick solution to a problem, its a bad idea in the long run, since anyone wanting to modify or validate that program later will have to be of a similarly rare level of ability)

  90. You can't have it both ways by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 1

    When a hacker goes to jail for five years, everyone moans over the fact that the hacker is given hard time equivalent to a murderer, even though the crime is obviously far lesser. Then, when something like this happens, everyone calls it a slap on the wrist... ??

  91. Fairer to say he blocked the door by Microsift · · Score: 1

    If you spray paint your local Wal Mart, they can still do business, MafiaBoy cost the websites he attacked money, not just for repairing the "grafitti" also for the lost customers while their sites were down.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Fairer to say he blocked the door by Ulmo91 · · Score: 1

      Didn't his big DOS attack occur back when all of the big e-tailers were loosing money on every transaction? If so, he could make the case that he actually saved them from significant losses.

  92. Re:bah! cane the wanker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, yes! Lets beat young, impressionable trouble makers!

    By reinforcing their hatred of society we will all reap wonderful benefits in the future.

    After all, people who feel they have a grudge against society would never come back to haunt us would they?

    Yeesh ...

  93. I've a secret for you: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the real idiot is the guy who spells
    "his" as "he's". Moron.

  94. YHBT YHL HAND (-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

    1. Re:YHBT YHL HAND (-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does YHBT YHL HAND mean anyways?

    2. Re:YHBT YHL HAND (-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you're trolling, too. Just for the ignorant...

      You Have Been Trolled
      You Have Lost
      Have A Nice Day

  95. Ah! The irony! The hypocracy! by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    So wait. When Mitnick hacks into a whole host of companies and networks and finally gets caught, you're up in arms because he got a harsh sentence, and now you whine because this guy got a light sentence for some DoS attacks.

    What's the deal here?

  96. Keep in mind by Microsift · · Score: 1

    He cannot enter the U.S. without fear of being arrested until the statute of limitations for his crime expires.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  97. I'm an American, you SOB... by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fuck you. I don't support any of that shit. Why don't you just get off your horse there, chico. I'm an Irish American, but most of all, I'm an AMERICAN. I just don't believe that ALL Arabs, etc., are terrorist like your narrow-minded ass. Piss off. My friend lost his cousin in that attack in NYC, so I feel as much pain as any other American...

    Get your marbles back in the bag or get the hell out of my sight...

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:I'm an American, you SOB... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect a knock for the FBI. You have already been turned in.

  98. Some historical perspective by murr · · Score: 1

    Robert T. Morris, creator of the internet worm, which took down a lot more of the internet (which, granted, was a lot smaller then), and who was an adult, was sentenced to three years probation, 40 hours of community service, and a $10K fine.

    8 months for a juvenile seems an adequate sentence to me.

    1. Re:Some historical perspective by frost22 · · Score: 1

      The Morris worm getting into the wild was an accident. This one was on purpose.

      f.

      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    2. Re:Some historical perspective by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      No, he meant for it to spread as far as possible. The denial-of-service was what he didn't expect.

      He hadn't thought the worms would run enough times on the same host to make a noticeable dent in the CPU usage- much less overload the system entirely. Unfortunately, his simple 14% worm-suicide probability was completely inadequate for keeping the population down, as any competent 2nd year Computer Sci student could tell you.

  99. time served by passion · · Score: 3

    on the other hand, hasn't he been in detention for about 1.5 years?

    --
    - passion
    1. Re:time served by Lac · · Score: 1

      on the other hand, hasn't he been in detention for about 1.5 years?



      Juveniles here are not sent to jail... Not as part of their sentencing, and certainly not when awaiting judgement.


  100. Jr. Mafia by LowOrderBit · · Score: 1

    this was his first time being caught. lets see if he becomes a repeat offender before we destroy his life..

    if the eight months in the youth center makes him realize that its not cool DDoS ppl, then it was a perfect sentence..

    I mean, really. even if you could make him realize that it wasnt cool and get him to stop by just talking to him, that would be fine..

    the idea here is not to punish, but to correct behavior. I support the sentence.. Its nice to see a court where the punishment actually fits the crime..

    now what type of slap should the DDoSed companies get for pulling bogus numbers out of the air to trump up the crime.. Furthermore, for being so vulnerable to a kid with a computer..

    --e0

  101. A different justice system by Lac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What you have to understand is this: you cannot compare this sentencing to the kind of sentencing he could have received had he been tried in the US or even in Ontario. Mafiaboy was not judged on US soil, by the US judicial system and under US laws.

    If you compare sentencing in the US with sentencing in other countries of the industrialized occident, the US in no way comes out as an average nation. Comparatively speaking, the US judicial system is extremely harsh. Prison sentences are much more common and much, much longer. Another example of this harshness is the death penalty, which is much more widely used in (parts of) the US than in the rest of the industrialized occident.

    Mafiaboy was judged and sentenced in Quebec, Canada. The Quebec judicial system operates on Canadian federal laws, but with largely distinct underlying values and interpretations. Whereas what is usually called "English Canada" generally wants to move towards a harsher, US-style judicial system, Quebec gererally wants to go towards prevention, leniency, and re-integration. This is especially true for young offenders. Young offenders in Quebec are not sentenced to five-year prison terms, even for violent crimes. Their anonymity is secured and they are sent to youth centers.

    Interestingly, it seems that the efficiency argument is on the side of lenient Quebec in this case. Quebec has a very good track record at maintaining low crime and violence rates amoungst youngsters. Prevention and re-integration obviously fails in many cases (as we all know), but apparently works "often enough" or "well enough" to give Quebec very good results.

    (My personal opinion? All other things being equal, I prefer shorter sentences. I will favor any solution which just works, but luckily, it seems that the one naturally prefer does precisely work. Yet if you must know, I am definitely for a "dangerous offender" clause which keeps total, dangerous lunatics off the streets for good.)

    So whoever was expecting a 15-year prison sentence (or anything vaguely similar) is not very well-informed. That is of course understandable: Quebec and Canada are not very well known outside or... Quebec and Canada. Some would even say respectively. But the amount of surprise apparent here just goes to show how much many US citizens believe "their way" to be "the standard way."

    And please remember: this is a DDOS attack; not a mass rape, not a murder, not a bloody beating. And if you stop thinking about magical, crime-banishing 25-year prison sentences for just a second, you might realize that 8 months in a youth detention actually is no small deal for a 17-year-old. I rather enjoyed beeing free during my teenage years.

  102. Now this would be extreme: @# +1 ; Funny #@ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Required reading and examinations on all of
    the (you guessed correctly!) uber-cyber-geek
    wannabe Jon Katz's posts to Slashdot.

    Such punishment would keep anyone out of jail,
    including Jon Katz.

    Have a marijuana-induced weekend.

  103. A small correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Fear Maphiaboy!!!!!!

    Free Maphiaboy!!!!!!

  104. Oh great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now we get to sit through 8 months of the 2600 guys screaming "Free Mafiaboy"

    1. Re:Oh great.... by cdalemx · · Score: 1

      that is highly unlikely

  105. Fuck him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say "fuck the little shit!" He knew what he was doing was wrong, he should accept the consiquences.

    Personally, if I know who his cell mates were, I'd send them a bottle of Tabasco sause to use a lubricant...

    1. Re:Fuck him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Personally, if I know who his cell mates were, I'd send them a bottle of Tabasco sause to use a lubricant...

      Personally, I hope some other script-kid brakes into your system and does a nice rm -rf on your disks.

  106. Incorrect assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their operating costs are about the same if they are up or down, since they are still paying for buildings, utilities, bandwidth, salaries, etc. It's funny to joke about, but they didn't actually save any money while they were down, and those numbers should not be credited to Mafiaboy.

    1. Re:Incorrect assumption by Jeff+Knox · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasnt talking about operating cost. I was talking about revenue. True operating cost are the same if they are up or down. However, they still could of saved money. Because loss of revenues, also means that lower net loss on the proceeds (selling below cost, all that kind of stuff) of those revenues. This is beyond the cash burn rate for a half a day. If I had cash burn rates from the companies we could come up with an ever better estimate that talks about about operating cost and whatnot. However though, I still stand by the revenue is a good metric of losses, because operating cost comes from money gained through sales (revenue), either that or VC money still in the bank, or credit, but still. So you would not add operating cost on top of that revenue figure to come up with estimated amount of financial damage, because you probably be accounting for it twice.

      --
      Jeff Knox
  107. Not translated enough by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's not enough of a translation yet. Here is the final version:

    Greetings to those for whom I hold some degree of low regard.

    I am a young computing/networking enthusiast who is disappointed with the punishment assigned to a fellow enthusiast. I have come into knowledge that is not universal; and because I have few other avenues through which I can gather respect, I intend to use this knowledge to randomly punish others. To accomplish this, I intend to display my knowledge through both gaming and non-gaming-oriented activities. I am also assigning myself a title to indicate my status. My long-term goals include assuming ownership of all facilities where personnel and equipment are centrally gathered.

    I shall now attempt to determine the correct usage of the program with which I am composing this message.

  108. It seems that law only protects big corporations by DVega · · Score: 1

    It seems that law only protects big corporations. You can read this article about a series of DoS attacks GRC.COM suffered. The FBI told the sysadmin that they can not help him because he need to probe a damage at least of $200,000

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
  109. Your aditude disturbs me by stuce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I will refrain from commenting on this individual in this case, it must be said that we in a free society need to always be on our guard as to what the laws are, why they are, and how they are being carried out.

    Why can a man in Virginia be throw in jail for going down on his wife in the privacy of their bedroom?

    Why does crack cocaine have harder sentences than powder?

    Why do blacks make up 15% of the US drug using population but 36% of the drug arrests?

    Why can consenting adults be jailed for what they do behind closed doors? [ prostitution, assisted suicide, drug use, sodomy ]

    Why, when people break the law, do we enroll them institutions that teach them how to harder criminals and then let them back into society?

    Why do we say we are rehabilitating criminals when we only punish them?

    The Price of Liberty is Eternal Vigilance.

    Sheep like you are the reason things are the way they are.

    1. Re:Your aditude disturbs me by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      What are you doing to change these things? At least I ADMIT that I'm totally apathetic about it. You take the "holier than thou" road.

  110. A correct sentencing would be... by frost22 · · Score: 1
    Judge: The defendant shall stand up !

    Pimple faced teen age script kiddy stands up. Gulps

    Judge: Defendant, you have already been found guilty of numerous crimes. You will now hear your sentence.

    You DOSed ebay and other cool and great web sites. By doing this you broke a gazillion of laws, and caused damage worth piles of dolares. For this you will pay dearly: 8 months is the slammer, and another year of probation

    Pimple faced teenage, stuttering: Your honour, tha...

    Judge (loud and harsh): I have not finished!

    Judge (now seemingly normal again):

    You called yourself a hacker: 2 Months.

    You used hacking software: another 3 Months.

    You could not explain to us what exactly this hacking software did: add 3 more.

    You did not have the source code of this hacking software: 2 more

    And when we gave you the source code for it, you were unable to compile it.: count another 2

    Now the judge's voice, increasingly shaky, is overwhelmed with disgust:

    You weren't even able to program and run a "hello world" program in C when we asked you to. another month

    not even after agent Hunzinger explained the printf syntax to you: 2 more

    The judge gets his voice under control again. The next point is read with the usual monotony:

    You ratted on your friends: 1 more

    your friends had lots of cool "warez" they said they got from you: another 6, one of these together with a lawyer from the SPA.

    But none of your "hacker" friends could use a compiler, either: 3 more

    Only one of them even had something remotely resembling a compiler. 2 months.

    that was a hacked version of visual basic; stored in an subdirectory with the name "warez for dad". 1 month.

    You used some useless kind of encryption in your email and while chatting: 2 months

    the agent reading these had to write an sed script to decrypt them, replaing all the 1 with i, the 3s with e, most z with s, and so on. He was so bored the state had to give him compensation for extraordinary job harshness. Another month.

    you bragged about your crimes: 2 months

    you bragged about your crimes where everybody could read you: 2 more months

    you bragged about your crimes in a way we could trace you back...: 3 months

    ...easily!: 1 more month
    the judge is slowly increasing volume, and vigor

    you had evidence of your crimes on your computer: another 2

    unencrypted...: 1 more

    ... and in a subdirectory called "hacking logs" ! makes 3 more

    you are sorry little cretin...: 1 more

    your presence pesters the air and my stomach: 1 month

    you have the intellectual capaciity of a young spinach plant: 1 month.

    And....

    Now the judge yells outright

    ... you did not even add up the fucking number of fucking months I'm sending you to the fucking slammer ! Did you ?

    Shocked silence in the courtroom. The defendant tries to say something, but gives up. Finally, he slowly shakes his head, looking firmly at the floor

    Judge, now at normal speach: Well. That additional 4 months now gets us up to a nice round 5 years. Now someone move that vegetable to the spinach plant!

    A sharp look to the small weaseling guy in a suit next to pimpleface: Lawyers, don't even think of an appeal. We neither discussed his beeing caught while using Microsoft Windows, nor his knowing at least 5 MCSEs.

    Case closed!

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    1. Re:A correct sentencing would be... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      In Canada it would be "My lord....." not "Your Honour"

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  111. MAFIABOY GETS BITCH SLAPPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't you wish? I know I do!!!

  112. Canadian law != American Law by dadragon · · Score: 1

    Why is it that the Americans can understand that French law is not the same as American law, but not that Canadian law is different?
    Anyway, here are highlights of the differences:
    1) Criminal law is federal.
    2) Courts all represent "Her Majesty The Queen"
    3) If the sentance is 2 years they go to a federal pen.
    5) Nobody gets a criminal record for commiting a provincial crime.
    6) We have "Crown Prosecutors" not "District Attourneys"
    7) We call the judge "My Lord" for a man, and "My Lady" for a woman, and collectively "His/Her Lordship".
    8) Minimum and maximum sentences are all federal and different from the American's.
    9) We don't have a 5th ammendment, but an equivalent. Here we can make you testify, but what you say can't be used against you in a following trial unless it's for purgury.
    10) I can't think of any more to summarise, but there are many more.

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    1. Re:Canadian law != American Law by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Oops I fscked up. 2 years for a provincial. 3+ for a federal pen!

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  113. For security, legalize cracking by sketerpot · · Score: 1
    I think that cracking in to another computer should be legal. If you do a DOS on Ebay, and cost people money, then you should be punished. If you transfer money from someone else's bank account to yours, you should have to give back the money, and be punished. But the crime should not be affected by the fact that you used a computer, or that you're one of those "hackers" that are being made examples of. If you break in to your ISP and look around, that should not be a crime.

    Why? For better internet security. If people have to actually protect their computers, rather than trusting some supposedly omnipotent government to toss crackers in the oubliette, they would pay a lot more attention to security. They would not buy products with a lot of security leaks, and patch them more often. IIS would become reasonably secure.

    If you make all wireless data fair game for people to intercept, people would start using encryption.

    Legalize cracking: it's for security!(tm)

    1. Re:For security, legalize cracking by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      Absolutely! Microsoft & other companies have gotten away with publishing horribly insecure products for years, partly because the "security" is provided by gunmen (FBI) who apply physical force to take care of the worst exploits

      But guess what? The internet is global, and the FBI can't be everywhere. China (or $ENEMY_OF_THE_WEEK) could easily sponsor 50 PhD hackers to do a genuinely damaging version of any of Mafiaboy's little tricks, and even if it was traced, there's no way for federal marshals to haul them down to a Californian courthouse.

      As the country gets more dependent on networked computers for daily economic control, the potential loss from such an attack would only get worse. The best defense is the "vaccine" approach: permit anyone to attack the systems at will, so that unsafe designs are quickly found out and rejected before we become dependent on them.

      There is no need for any new laws against "computer crime" or "cyberterrorism". Existing statutes against wire fraud and vandalism should be fully sufficient. Leave everything else up to the free market.

      ("Cyberterrorism"!! That stupid word is a bad joke. As we're now reminded, terror is about flaming corpses falling from the sky, not some web page being remotely erased.)

  114. Re:Easy? No 'puter for 8+ Months ! Kill me Now ! by SmegTheLight · · Score: 1

    He probably isn't allowed to touch a computer for the entire 8 months, and probably not for his entire probation. I don't know about the rest of you geeks, but 20 months without being able to touch a computer is one hell of a punishment.

    --
    Time travel is possible. We are quickly heading for 1984.
  115. Mitnick vs MafiaBoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand this. You whine and whine about them being too harsh on Mitnick and then whine that they aren't harsh enough on Mafiaboy. Jeseu H. Christ, what do you want?

  116. Hardly a slap on the wrist by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    America is so caught up in this "Punish them so they realize how dumb it was" phase. What they don't really realize is what putting someone away for 10 years (especially at the age mafiaboy is) can do to a person. Release a 25 year old who has been in jail for the past ten years, and they have no shot at a normal life. While some people say "Good, what he deserves," I honestly doubt if he has any brains he'll try something like this again.

    Sure, the kid got a rise out of slowing the internet for a few days, but we all did stupid stuff when we were 15. Hell, some of my friends went out and threw rocks at cars off an overpass on the freeway. Sure, we realize how utterly dangerous this was now, but it seemed like something fun and rebellious in 8th grade. It's hardly a reason to take the rest of someone's life away. This kid is going to have a hard enough time getting a decent job or even into college with this on his record.

    The point of prison is to pusnish, but I doubt any of you know how hard even eight months in a controlled environment like juvenile detention is. This is pretty harsh, I have a friend who were caught for posession of a rather large quantity of marijuana and only got 3 months probation because he was 16 and federal drug laws didn't apply (had he been 2 years older, the min. sentence is 25 years, which is absurd for having some ganja) The moral of this post? We as a country are so hell-bent on the punishment of criminals (I'm mainly talking about the non-violent ones) that we fail to see the punishment does more harm to society than the crime itself. I doubt many of you can fathom what jail is like. Even a year in jail is not something you forget easily.

  117. stupidity by sklib · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why this guy, being able to pull off these attacks, didn't do all of this shit from a cybercafe in the middle of NYC where nobody can ever trace you, or like a terminal at the public library.

    But 8 months in juvy is gonna be rough. He ought to be in high school learning shit -- this kid's life is pretty much screwed now because if he ever had a chance to get into a good college, it's gone now. Plus, motivation is gonna be a problem...

    --
    -S
  118. Almost there, but one more fix by unformed · · Score: 2

    > Maphiaboy!

    Mafiaboy!

    1. Re:Almost there, but one more fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free mafiaboy", not "Fear mafiaboy"

      Don't try to follow my thread, I wouldn't come here in months

  119. WTF... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... stupid script kiddies, what did he really do to get fucked up this much. 18 monthes remeber that arctical about juvie computers, oregon trail would suck for 18monthes. I bet they don't even use Linux or even anything POSIX compliant. Shit that sucks for him, see what happens when you make US compinies lose a little cash (relitave to what they make)

    again WTF

  120. what happened to his dad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    hey, wasn't the reason for the "mafiaboy" handle mentioned at all?

    seems that when the cops tapped his phone line they got something they didn't expect: his dad was taking out a contract on someone.

    more here

  121. Let People take some damn responsibility! by Platypii · · Score: 1

    Hello??? He ruined his OWN future when he launched an attack on those sites.... IMO, he should be banned from computers for life, and at least 5 years jail time!

  122. Well... by stuce · · Score: 1

    I keep a close eye on what bills are being passed and contact my representatives when they must or must not be supported. I write letters to the editors of news papers when they write rather informed or uninformed articles. I donate time and money to organizations that push for change. I spark debate on public web boards. I challenge everyone I know with fact-backed debate and try to change minds one at a time.

    I'm sorry I spoke to harshly to you earlier. You caught me in an unusually bad mood. But, yes, that totally apathetic attitude does bother me when I think of the two million people rotting in jail for stupid laws that exist because too many people are apathetic.

    I don't want to put my chip on your shoulder, that's a lot to carry. But if you know that these things are wrong what justice does it do you to espouse the opposing rhetoric? All I really want is for you to at least understand the issues you are speaking out on. We are so close to a truly great society and there is just a gap of information to bridge.

  123. Alternative Punishment by OverDrive33 · · Score: 1

    Why can't we be more creative when punishing kids... I mean, he may make friends in the detention center.
    Lets hear some suggestions for punishments other than imprisionment...
    For example:
    Be forced to clean out every grease tray from every McDonalds in the city of Montreal. (Perhaps drink whats left? maybe thats TOO harsh)
    or
    Computer teacher for the elderly... nonstop. Trust me, when your trying to teach a 70 year old "how to use a mouse" you feel like shooting yourself.
    even better
    Forbid him to use any computer thats faster than a pentium 90.
    Finally. Perhaps the most durastic and painful:
    Make him use Windows.

  124. Doesn't anyone see that he's a criminal? by aWalrus · · Score: 1
    In slashdot, this kind of reaction is typical. Poor kid, he's just an innocent geek and will suffer sooo much. Fact is: he directed an attack toward commercial sites and made them lose a hell of a lot of money in the process!. There's no educational purpose in this. If he's such a bright kid, he should have set up a server in his own machine (or some other place) and experimented with it all he wanted.

    There's nothing innocent about this, and the punishment was well earned.

    --
    Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
  125. 8 months is light? by Swaffs · · Score: 1

    Remember, this is a country where beating up another guy gets you 5 minutes in the box.

    --

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

  126. ...unless Microsoft is being discussed (n/t) by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

    ...

  127. BIG CRIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, he did shut down several businesses for some time. These were not sole proprierships. These were corporations. What he did was not a video game but at best a malicious thoughtless act , not considering the lively hood of employees, stock holders, customers, suppliers, ..etc, that would be inconvenienced or harmed by his act. At worst, he purposely harmed the financial well being, not only of company employees, but the financial well being of investors. In addition many web masters do make profit from their referral program. And what of the authors who may have missed sales, and therefor royalties?
    It's hard not to hate big corporations and rare to find someone who takes their side, but this was not a victimless crime. It was a crime that affected those in another country it was on such a broad scale. Worst, it was an act of a sociopath who is unable to understand how to behave in society in a lawful manner and unable to consider the effects of his actions on others.

  128. Easy??? by fugue · · Score: 1

    Do you really think that 8 months is an easy sentence? Especially at that age? Just because US courts are so fond of handing out sentences that will destroy a life, don't think that anything less than 5 years is barely a sentence. Not so good for sending warnings to others, perhaps, but if the stated goal of punishment is correction (and at that age it's not unreasonable) then the sentence will hurt a hell of a lot without completely destroying his chance of having a normal life.

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  129. Anyone who would say it's a slap on the wrist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...has obviously never spent a single day in custody.

    Damn /. nerds think they know EVERYTHING.

    Stick to Linux.