Star Trek: Nemesis Gets the Go Signal

PatJensen writes "Star Trek TNG: Nemesis, the 10th Star Trek movie gets the green light from Paramount today. It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider. Looks to be pretty action packed. Digital Domain (LOTR, Titanic) will be doing the SFX. The movie seems to be based around Romulan conflict with the Federation. " Can't be as bad as Insurrection. At least, I hope not. BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

Comments

Directing...

[Raleel]

I think that Jonathon Frakes is actually a pretty solid director, as is LeVar Burton. I look back on my favorite episodes and those guys did most of them...

Re:Directing...

[nettdata]

LeVar Burton also seems to be directing his fair share of the new Enterprise series as well.

it's an even number trek

[jmahler]

so it CAN'T be too bad. :)

besides, the romulans are, as they say, bad ass. Could actually be good!

(fingers seriously crossed)

Re:it's an even number trek

[Anonymous Coward]

so it CAN'T be too bad. :)

Two words: Captain Janeway.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Anonymous Coward]

Hey, we're talking movies here :)

Re:it's an even number trek

[sam@caveman.org]

let's run them down, shall we? plot writeups and ratings by leonard maltin, quoted from IMDB.

1. star trek: the motion picture. "The crew of the Enterprise is reunited to combat a lethal force field headed toward Earth. Slow, talky, and derivative, somewhat redeemed by terrific special effects and majestic Jerry Goldsmith score; still, mainly for purists." RATING: 2.5 stars.
2. star trek: the wrath of khan. "Kirk and the Enterprise crew must do battle with the nefarious villain of 1967's ``Space Seed'' episode. A bit hokey and pretentious at times, but a likable adventure overall, with nice touches of warmth and humor." RATING: 3 stars.
3. star trek iii: the search for spock. "Picking up where #2 left off, Kirk reassembles his crew and shanghais the Enterprise to try and rescue Spock--in whatever form he may still be alive--while both he and the rapidly destructing Genesis Planet are endangered by a Klingon warship (led by Lloyd, in an ineffectual performance). Subdued sci-fi outing very much in keeping with tone of the original TV series... and therefore, recommended most heartily to Star Trek fans." RATING: 3 stars.
4. star trek iv: the voyage home. "The Enterprise crew takes a sharp left turn toward comedy in this uncharacteristic--and very entertaining--movie. Story has the familiar characters time-traveling back to the 20th century in order to save the Earth of the future, with the help of some humpback whales. Sheer novelty of the comic tone excuses some forays into the obvious; it's all in fun." RATING: 3.5 stars.
5. star trek v: the final frontier. "The Enterprise crew takes off on an emergency mission when an apparent madman takes over a distant planet and holds its interstellar ambassadors hostage; his motives, however, turn out to be anything but terroristic. Dramatically shaky trek starts off with a case of the cutes, and gets worse before it (finally) gets better. A weak entry in the series. Shatner's feature-film directing debut; he also shares story credit." RATING: 2 stars.
6. star trek vi: the undiscovered country. "The Enterprise crew is assigned to negotiate truce with Klingon leader, only to fall prey to a trap set by one of his renegade cohorts (Plummer, in a deliciously flamboyant performance). Entertaining saga cowritten by director Meyer. Nimoy helped concoct the story and also executive produced." RATING: 3 stars.
7. star trek: generations. "The old guard gives way to the new, as Capt. Kirk (Shatner) passes the baton to a new Starfleet commander, Capt. Picard (Stewart). Episodic adventure yarn plays like an elongated segment of the Next Generation TV series; not inspired, perhaps, but entertaining just the same, with some impressive special effects. Oddly enough, the weakest segment is the climactic teaming of Picard and Kirk, which seems like a leftover from an old Saturday matinee serial. Whoopi Goldberg appears unbilled as Guinan." RATING: 3 stars.
8. star trek: first contact. "Capt. Picard lives his worst nightmare as the villainous Borg (who almost overtook him in a two-part TV episode) land on earth with domination their goal. The solution: the crew travels back in time to 2063 to make sure a cockeyed scientist (Cromwell) fulfills his role in history with a precedent-setting rocket flight. Story goes on a bit, following two concurrent threads, but series fans will have no complaints. Krige is a standout as the seductive Borg Queen. Feature directing debut for Frakes, better known as Riker." RATING: 3 stars.
9. star trek: insurrection. "Good entry in the long-running series has the crew befriending the eternally youthful residents of a Shangri-La-like planet whose existence is threatened by the vengeful Ru'afo (Abraham). Picard (Stewart) even has a dalliance with one of the women there (Murphy). Reliably entertaining for Star Trek fans." RATING: 3 stars.
10. star trek: nemesis - ?

looks pretty random to me.

-sam

Re:it's an even number trek

[jgalun]

Yes, it's random if you listen to Leonard Maltin (a particularly poor movie critic). But if you ask the average Star Trek fan, they'll tell you that the Wrath of Khan was a LOT better than The Motion Picture (most of my friends can't sit through ST:1, but we all love ST:2), that The Voyage Home was MUCH more fun to watch than The Search for Spock, and that the Undiscovered Country was a heads and shoulders above The Final Frontier. I don't even understand how Maltin can put these movies so close together in their ratings - 2, 4, and 6 really captured the feel of the original series, with camraderie and action, while 1, 3, and 5, were like stupid versions of the Next Generation, trying to be intelligent but completely failing.

Re:it's an even number trek

[vinnythenose]

As I understood it 6 was "Aw shit, Shatner really screwed up the last movie, now we have to make another on!"

Re:it's an even number trek

[hardburn]

Capt. Kirk (Shatner) passes the baton to a new Starfleet commander, Capt. Picard (Stewart).

That scene sucked. In Star Trek V, he said he knew he would die alone. Checking "Generations" again . . . nope, Picard was standing right there when he died.

Then Shatner has to go and write some stupid books about it, bring Kirk back to life after "Generations" took place, then "die alone" (as he was supposed to) while having the arrogance to destroy the entire Borg collective, then writing another book after "Insurrection", bring back Kirk AGAIN, and saying "no, I didn't destroy the Borg, that was just a small section of the collective". Uggg.

Re:it's an even number trek

[LWolenczak]

This is very true, if your a true trekie, you know that the odd numbered movies sucked!!

so, it CAN'T be TOOOOO bad

Re:it's an even number trek

[denzo]

Generally based on Maltin's ratings, here is the empirical formula to a successful new Star Trek movie:

• Directed by Frakes.
• Story and executive production by Nimoy.
• Keep Shatner the heck away from the set.
• Keep it fast and not too much dialog.
• Bring in Whoopi again.
• Throw in some Klingons and Borg.
• Music by Jerry Goldsmith.
• What about Q?
• And at last but not least, for the last half of the movie, turn it into a comedy where the crew goes back to the 20th Century with the help of dolphins and Lassie to help save Wil Wheaton's career by coercing him not to accept the role in the series. Suddenly, a disruption in the time-space continuoum causes Richard Simmons to suddenly replace Wil Wheaton in all the series and movies, and the whole thing was just an aerobic workout video to begin with.

What do you think? ;)

Re:it's an even number trek

[buckeyeguy]

The even-odd thing didn't start until about ST 5... people started to ask "how can we avoid the bad ones?"

But really, the 1st ST movie wasn't that bad (talk about new frontiers! The 1st one could have been made a dozen different ways after all), and 3 was mostly a shock to the purists (A main cast member dies? And not be resurrected by a time warp thingie! Blasphemy!!!) I enjoyed both. Ricardo Montalban was just a very hard villain to measure up to in the later movies, and that's why some of them were panned (until the Borg showed up and became the new really nasty villain).

In other words, when people quote the even/odd thing, ignore 'em, watch the flicks and judge for yourself. Here's hoping the new one is great.

Re:it's an even number trek

[zericm]

plot writeups and ratings by leonard maltin, quoted from IMDB.

More proof that Maltin's reviews are worthless. My ranking of the Star Trek movies:

• ST2:TWoK
  
• ST4:TVH
  
• ST8:FC
  
• ST1:TMP
  
• ST3:TSFS
  
• ST6:UC
  
• ST9:I
  
• ST7:G
  
• ST5:TFF
  

My TOS bias really comes out here, although I found FC to be a very entertaining film. It was the most accessable of the TNG based films for non-TNG fans.

Generations was a rotten TV episode translated to the big screen. The plot was weak, the script was worse (coudln't they rewrite the opening scene after Nimoy and Kelly took a pass on this piece of shit), assumed the audience had seen every episode of TNG (who were the Klingon chicks with the tits?), and killed Kirk off in a rather lame manner. I had no problem with the man dying, but he desrved better.

I would have ranked Generations dead last, but
Shatner did his best to do his worst.

eric

Re:it's an even number trek

[mongoks]

That scene sucked. In Star Trek V, he said he knew he would die alone. Checking "Generations" again . . . nope, Picard was standing right there when he died.

He meant with Bones and Spock with him he couldn't die. Picard was basically a stranger to him anyways.

Re:it's an even number trek

[talesout]

I always figured that "die alone" thing was about dying without a love interest, but I'm only a half-time Trekkie, so what would I know.

But, one thing I am quite sure of, anyone that has ever actually met Shatner say that he is the most arrogant asshole you could ever care to meet. I suppose becoming the "most important sci-fi captain" of your generation at the young age he started as Captain Kirk could do that to you. But, my guess would be that he just listened a little too closely to scripts and books that called Captain Kirk a legend, and forgot that William Shatner was the real person, a bad actor with a truly shitty talking voice.

"Bones...(pause), I...(pause) cantseemtofind...(pause) my...(pause)..."

OH FINISH THE GODDAMNED SENTENCE ALREADY WILL YOU!

Just think how cool Captain Kirk could have been had they gotten a real actor to play him.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Evro]

Shatner brought Kirk back to life because the way they had him die in "Generations" was awful. It was really a slap in the face. I mean, he falls off a bridge? That's the best the writers could come up with? I really found this appalling. I understand that it was difficult for them to write a story around the transition from TOS to TNG, but "Generations" was pretty bad, and the way Kirk died added insult to injury. I haven't read any of Shatner's books but if he wanted to bring Kirk back just to give him a better death then IMO he has that right. Maybe the cycle of the TNG movies will be crap -> good -> crap -> good (Generations -> First Contact -> Insurrection -> Nemesis?). One can only hope.

Another questions: Why not incorporate any of the Voyager or DS9 cast? I missed the end of DS9 but from what I gather they pretty much tied up all the loose ends at the end, but Voyager was left wide open. So why not?

Re:it's an even number trek

[mongoks]

Actually it was 2 where Spock died to be exact.

Most people will go see the Trek films regardless of the even/odd factor. I think it's just an observation that seems to fit amongst most people. The odd numbered ones are disappointing. I loved ST:TMP but it did have it's flaws.

Re:it's an even number trek

[PyroMosh]

Wow, that's quite diffrent than I'd rank them. Though I've always found TNG and DS9 to be my favorites. I rank em something lke this:

ST6:TUC
ST8:FC
ST1:TMP
ST7:G
ST2:TWoK
ST4:TVH
ST3:TSfS
ST9:I
ST5:TVH

Even though I always prefered the 24th century Trek series, 6 tops my list because it was just that undeniably good it suffered from none of the acting problems in many of the others, it had the drama, the plot, and wasn't hokey (although a certain amount of lightness is of course acceptable or even desirable, some of the others were over the top).

As for The Wrath of Kahn, ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!? It was okay but I have the same criticizm you did of Generations with Lursa and B'Etor. Kahn was in ONE episode. At least the "Klingon chicks with the tits" were recurring villans. They were in probably half a dozen episodes. Look back 30 years before any of the movies were made. Who were the recurring villans in TOS that you wouldn't have to have seen every episode to know? Harry Mudd? Now there's a frightening villan!

Next, I've got ST1. I dunno, I loved that one. Especially where they find out what V'Ger was. That was just great. The diffrence between it and the rest of the TOS movies (Except 6) seemed to me that it wasn't trying to be just liek the good old days of the series. This was a crew that was thrust back together for a crisis, not just another episode with better effects.

Next, for Generations, I liked this one. I liked how they included the Enterprise B, I liked everything except for the fact that the villan didn't seem larger than life liek a villian in a Trek feature film should. (Though he did remind me of my JROTC Colonel, so that was fun). As for how kirk died, yeah, it lacked drama. But it allowed "private time" between the two captains so that there could be closure. I also loved (and was probably shocked the same way TOS fans were at the end of TWoK) how the Enterprise is destroyed.

I had TWoK next, and it would have been higher, but really, I never thought Kahn was a very impressive villan. Strike that. He is impressive. But not make-a-movie-about-it impressive. But despite that, it did make for some very entertaining trek, especially on the surface of the dust planet and the starship battle.

The Voyage home was next, because it was light and entertaining and just better than the other two remaining films.

The Search For Spock was lame. Like the bad episodes where they over use a plot device like the transporter to make the crew into children or animals or transport them into a parallel universe. Just hokey.

As for Insurection, I would have had no problem with it, if it had been an episode. It feels like an episode. I dunno, I just feel that the films should be important. Something BIG shoudl be on the line. Insurection just had this unremarkable away mission episode feel to it. Nothing wrong with it, but it should never have been a feature film.

Then we have 5... oh dear, 5.
What can I say about a film where they go to the edge of the galaxy to try and find God? I mean, there's really nothing I can say about... that digit that I shall not mention because it hath been dirtyed by Shatner's directing...
I'm looking forward to Nemesis. I always thought the Romulans v. Next Gen was a movie that needed to be made, but after the Dominion War in DS9, I figured that would never happen. Speaking of which, I'd LOOOVE to see a DS9 film. I didn't particularly like Voyager and I haven't had time to watch Enterprise, but I liked DS9 as much as TNG. I loved how dark it was I loved the characters. And I loved how the universe got turned on it's head by the Dominion War. Too bad it looks like it will never see a film ):

Re:it's an even number trek

[Deadbolt]

Well, in the original script, Kirk was shot by Soran (the bad guy) with some kind of phaser weapon. I think he died after a climactic fight between Picard and Soren. Not sure why they changed it, but it wouldn't have been any better. What a stupid way to kill one of my heroes. :(

Re:it's an even number trek

[Anonymous Coward]

Bring in Whoopi again.


Again? There was a lot of sexual inuendo, but I can't recall ever seeing folks actually going at it. Steamy scenes would bring in a different element though...

P.S. For those that might not know, whoopee (pronounced the same as Whoopi) is slang for having sex. In other words, this post is a farce.

Re:it's an even number trek

[bay43270]

I know these are just books, but I really think this is the same thing Star Trek has always suffered from - lack of continuity. On the rare occasion things don't wrap themselves up perfectly within 60 minutes, any attempt at a story arc seems forced.

On the up side, you can watch the episodes (or the movies) in any order... you don't have to worry about back-story.

Re:it's an even number trek

[hurst]

Why not incorporate any of the Voyager or DS9 cast?
I think the Voyager cast is best used in an odd-numbered episode.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Anonymous Coward]

I have this rant that no one seems to
share. Essentially, it is the degradation
of star trek from the original in
regards to the realistic feel.
In TOS you truly got a (sometimes disconcerting)
feel that you were on the equivalent of a ship
at sea in the void where the captain's authority
was ultimate, and that the whole undertaking was
highly dangerous and starships were at least as
complex as a 20th century Aircraft Carrier.

NOW however, you get the idea that starfleet
isn't so much a military organisation as
some nonprofit organization, where everything
is up for debate. And even when they do
debate it isn't as heated as though they
even care. And the operation of a starship is
as routine as operating a buick sedan.

Furthermore, weaponry was at a logical point of
progression from our current weaponry.
I mean in TOS several allusions were made to
the ability of a constellation class starship
to A)destroy the surface of a planet and
B)to potentially destroy the bulk of the planet
(with antimatter at least and possibly
with multiple phaser banks)

Hand phasers were capable of quickly burning
truck size holes in solid rock, totally vaporize hordes
of attacking people, they could be set for wide
field stun etc. And they were treated with
awe by the crew, like they were half afraid
of them. Kirk often displayed tactical skill
in deploying his team similar to fireteams in
Vietnam.

NOW, however the hand phasers after TOS are
hardly distinguishable from current small arms.
Watching the current use of hand phasers is
like watching a wild west shootout with little
peripherial damage. Additionally, tactics are
rarely coordinated. I think that in many cases 5 people
with handphasers wouldn't be a match of 5 SAS soldiers
with hk submachine guns. I'm not
particularly violent or bloodthirsty but I find
the current combat displays insulting to watch.
Also, are we to believe that the people of earth are
so stupid that they wouldn't realize that their
weaponry is worst than it was during the 20th
Century.

I'm afraid until they fix this I'm starting to
watch less and less star trek.

Re:it's an even number trek

[hardburn]

I'll accept that Kirk's death was handled wrong, and that Shatner could bring him back at least in a book to give him a proper death would be OK. But doing it with a suicide attack that takes out the entire Borg collective and then bringing him back for more books is incredibly arrogant, espically being that with VERY few exceptions, Trek books are not cannon.

Re:it's an even number trek

[buckeyeguy]

yeah, I remembered that after I posted (doh!) but still, Spock starts the movie missing, and even at the end he's not himself yet (I mean, Spock in a hotel bathrobe with a dopey 'huh?' look on his face? Yuck!)... I think that's why people may not like ST3. It ties the series together, but isn't a wham bang movie by itself.

The same movie vs. movie comparisons come up in discussion of Bond films; and they're about as relevant... don't watch the ones ya don't like (like ST5 or Moonraker... either way, ouch!)

Re:it's an even number trek

[Evro]

Well, as I (think I) said, I haven't read any of his books myself. But that does sound like a really dumb thing for him to do. Taking out the entire collective? That's so dumb. Makes it difficult for anyone to take that book seriously, I'd guess. Taking out all the borg in the sector, ok, that's perfectly legit in star trek land. But to attempt to remove a major galactic player from the Star Trek world is a mistake.

Re:it's an even number trek

[CoffeeJedi]

actually i seem to remember Riker warning an alien once that with the phaser set to full power with a wide dispersal area, it would vaporize half the building they were standing in... but i guess its more dramatic to have your heroes be seemingly overwhelmed by the enemy
buti think you're over-analyzing the use of phasers on TOS, Gene Roddenberry once said that the show was like a western in space, so the phasers were used more like 6-shooters, but whatever, just my take on it

Re:it's an even number trek

[Anonymous Coward]

Just make sure it's a damned cosmic, i.e. epic movie, not a stupid "local", i.e. planetary one like the big red magical ribbon flying thru space or Insurrection.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

> Picard was standing right there when [Kirk] died.

No, it was later on when Picard went to the bathroom after putting Kirk up on a bier.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

Well, Voyager had the honor of taking out the entire Borg galactic transwarp conduit system for its last episode, so Kirk doing in the Borg for his death isn't out of the question.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

> * Keep it fast and not too much dialog.

Although the two best, Kahn and, ugh, shave the whales, both relied heavily on dialog, which is to say, philosophy and tactics for Kahn, and humor for Whales.

I also think it made the first, the Vger story, one of the best, but I'm evidently in the minority. I always did like the cosmic stories better than most. Who wants to see little men lift little weights?

Re:it's an even number trek

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

1 was very good
2 was awesome3 was so-so
4 and 5 sucked. These are the voyages of the Star Ship Enterprise, not the voyages of the Klingon PT Boat Warbird. That damned thing changed size by a factor of 20 depending on the scene, for crying out loud.

Then the Borg come in a completely underwhelming story.

Then not much happens until Insurrection, which was a dumb story, but had a cute female guest star.

Re:it's an even number trek

[BelDion]

Don't remember how where I got it or how it came to be in my dump file.. It's a bit dated too, but don't worry abot that.

It's not about odd/even movies, it's about PRIME NUMBERS! Have a little glimpse into the future:

Trek 7: 'The Spacefight Club'
This series will be composed almost entirely of starship dogfights in space, with some minor plot thrown in to appease the critics. Alien hottie flesh will be in abudance.

Trek 9: 'What Starship Captains Want'
Female and 'sensitive' male starfleet officers will particpate in a romantic comedy set entirely inside Starfleet headquarters. There will occasionally be futuristic matte paintings in the background depicting a futuristic earth, but there won't be any action or fight scenes.

Trek 13: 'Starfleet Tactics'
Series written by Tom Clancy. This one will be a little more 'intellectual' than previous Treks, but will focus on political machinations, espionage, technical and scientific detail, and large-scale starship battles. Action will not be plentiful, but it will be frequent, and well written. Critics will hail it as a 'sleeper hit'.

Treks 14-16:
Will nearly bankrupt Paramount due to the casting of David Spade, Tom Green, and Britney Spears as starship captains.

Trek 17:
Will be filmed using a combination of live action, full-scale starship models that really explode, and state-of-the-art quantum computer-based animation. The series will depict a life-or-death struggle in space and on Earth for the future of humanity, with generous dashes of action, sex, comedy, and gratuitous explosions. Due to the damages incurred wiping out the City of San-Francisco with a neutron explosion for the grand finale of the series, Paramount will go bankrupt.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

I'll just hide behind this metal shipping container. That'll block the phaser!

> Also, are we to believe that the people of earth
> are so stupid that they wouldn't realize that
> their weaponry is worst than it was during the
> 20th Century?

It's the computer game syndrome. In reality, the slightest gust would disrupt a "magical spellcaster". A 10-foot tall, 4000-lb ogre who can lift 10 tons and swings a 200-lb sword at the caster would not "whif" for 10 points of damage, sorry.

That that idiocy is making it into the movies is kind of sad.

Of course, it's possible materials science has produced such indestructable, but light, materials for shipping containers.

So light, in fact, that they should be used as armor, too.

But that's another problem.

Presumably, this movie will be post-Voyager, so they should have a massive high-tech upgrade with the armor plating, the 26th century holo emitter, the high speed transwarp information that Voyager, all alone, picked up but couldn't capitalize on, and so on.

I don't see why the Romulans would be anything but a bunch of Taliban to the Federation.

Re:it's an even number trek

[jafac]

Star Trek 4, 3.5 stars? You're sick man, get help.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Flower]

I'll just hide behind this metal shipping container. That'll block the phaser!

Nononononono. The best was in the Final Frontier when Kirk calls in the photon torpedo arclight on the gang and "god" and they survive by jumping behind "big rocks."

Oh the pain. The pain. As Dr. Smith would say. I managed to tenuously suspend disbelief for over an hour and then it shattered like a glass goblin. Just proved to me that another thing William Shatner can't do is direct.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Banjonardo]

that's SO weird. I noticed just yesterday. Kahn was great, voyage to 20th century was too, First Contact kicked ass. weird, no? VI was ok, good action.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Banjonardo]

The voyage home above First Contact? come on!

I simply loved TVH because of seeing them in the 80s. That was great. But........whales? No action! FC, on the other hand, had some awesome special effects, scared little children, and had great plot.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Major]

Even number? (i.e. not an odd arabic numeral)
or
Even number? (i.e. yet more flat and unfeeling)

Re:it's an even number trek

[Anonymous Coward]

Just think how cool Captain Kirk could have been had they gotten a real actor to play him

Yeah, he would be just as cool as the sarg on Rat Troop ... what was his name again? .. uh yeah, it doesn't matter because 99% of everyone has forgotten the goddamn show.

Shatner made Star Trek, FWIW. Even as an obnoxious stage actor. Go back to bitching about moderation and let paramount make their money.

Re:it's an even number trek

[Twistor]

Your comment about Generations rekindled a thought I had immediately after seeing it: Good god why couldn't they have made the TNG finale "All Good Things.." be a motion picture, and in fact I always try to place "All Good Things" into the Trek Movie Debate every chance I get.

trekkies are too optimistic

[SirSlud]

> Can't be as bad as Insurrection.

Famous last words!

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[hardburn]

But as another poster pointed out, it's an even-numbered trek movie. Everyone hates the odd-numbered ones (the first one was particularly bad, though I haven't seen the new DVD released) and are generaly considered cursed. OTOH, even numbered ones are generaly considered great. Number 4 (often known as "the one with the whales") is one of the top 100 money making movies of all time. One suggestion for getting around this problem is that Paramount should write two scripts, then throw out the first one.

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[Kryptonomic]

Number 4

Whoa. That is my least favourite of all Star Treks. It sucked even more than Insurrection and that was hard to beat.

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[Foochar]

No Star Trek could be any worse than 5 was. The one that starts off in the desert and procedues to the galactic core in a search for "God". That is the only Star Trek movie that I won't even pause on if I come to it flipping through channels. Although now that I have a TIVO I find I don't do near as much channel surfing as I used to.

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[Yet Another Smith]

> Can't be as bad as Insurrection.

Famous last words!

Hmm I tend to concur. Remember once saying, "it can't be as bad as Star Trek V!" At least 5 had one funny line: "What does God need with a Starship?" There was nothing funny about Insurrection (OK, DATA going nuts was actually really cool, but otherwise it was excessively lame).

And with respect to another crappy odd-numbered trek, I found it interesting that, in an interview on John Stewart's short lived late-night talk show immediately prior to the release of Generations and Tank Girl, Malcom McDowell would only allow Stewart to talk about Tank Girl, not "the other movie."

We can only hope that the odd-even thing continues to play out.

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[hardburn]

I didn't particularly like it either, but Paramount will be very happy if they get another Trek movie with the money number 4 pulled in.

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[gowen]

Malcom McDowell would only allow Stewart to talk about Tank Girl, not "the other movie."

Holy Mother Of Fuck. A movie worse the "Tank Girl"? Boy, an I glad I've never seen Insurrection...

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[aboxbayz]

My god I really can't believe that everyone thought that Insurrection was really that bad I mean it wasn't a clasic; It did not even live up to what you where really expecting (hipe is so pointless), but still imho that there was an intresting plot to it and we got to see why subspace weapons are really no ones friends.

I would also like to add ... I think that we need a Picard Q. reunion! maybe with his little brat of a son Q. =)

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[SpryGuy]

Star Trek's 2, 4, 6, and 8 are the four best.

The worst by far is 5. It's not even in the same category.

Four is a very good movie, and a very good Trek movie... if you didn't like it, you must have misplaced your sense of humor or something. Most people list it as their first or second favorite (with Trek 2 being the other first or second favorite).

Re:trekkies are too optimistic

[Anonymous Coward]

> That is the only Star Trek movie that I won't even
> pause on if I come to it flipping through channels.

Except for the part where Uhura flashes some major thigh. I was disturbed to be aroused, but no real man will deny his impulses just to preserve surface respectability.

"Yes, what use has 'God' for a starship?" was one of the best lines in the entire ST history, but it didn't make up for the lameness of the rest, and certainly not for the (nerdly) idiocy of travelling quickly to the core of the galaxy instead of taking 20-30 years.

Wrong title

[Strange_Attractor]

If it has Troi doing that "empath" crap, maybe it should be Star Trek: Emetic.

Stuart Baird did *not* direct "Tomb Raider"

[imac.usr]

That film was made by Simon "I haven't got a fucking clue as to how to edit a close-in action scene" West, the luminary genius behind "Con Air".

Note that he's scheduled to direct the feature-film adaptation of "The Prisoner" as well. God help fans of the original series.

He, Akiva Goldsman, and Nora Ephron should all be made part of the cast of the next "Survivor" series so that they can't do any more damage in Hollywood for at least a year or so.

Re:Stuart Baird did *not* direct "Tomb Raider"

[SGDarkKnight]

Actually, if you read the Paramount article it says that he served as executive producer on Paramount Pictures' "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider"

Re:Stuart Baird did *not* direct "Tomb Raider"

[Anonymous Coward]

Executive Producer isn't Director.

Re:Stuart Baird did *not* direct "Tomb Raider"

[Anonymous Coward]

True Dat...

Romulans

[digitalsushi]

Finally.. we had to wait til the 10th movie to finally arrive at the one with the Romulans. They've been saving them as a plot for... forever. And, its an even numbered flick, so its probably inevitable that this movie is going to be very, very good.

"Captain Picard and Commander Data. Oh, and those other guys too."

Re:Romulans

[evil_one]

It has been said that this will be the last "The Next Generation" movie, so I'm not surprised that they kept this one in the bag.

Re:Romulans

[Anonymous Coward]

Well they've just about killed off everyone else in the universe.

Once they kill off the romulans, they'll no doubt head back in time to kill the same people again, but before they killed them last time...

Insurrection was BAD?

[Zigg]

I beg to differ. Insurrection was very good. It made sense. It was entertaining. And watching Data's head float around was cool :-)

If you want a bad recent ST movie, try First Contact. Absolutely destroyed the Borg mythos in one fell swoop.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[the_2nd_coming]

first contact was a good movie, and it did not destroy anything about the borg...they still exist you know...each cube is a hive and each hive has a "Queen" this just so happened to be the hive that Picard was captured and assimilated into before the entire federation fleet was destroyed at the battle of "wolf(can't remember the name)"

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[shoemakc]

insurrection was fairly forgetable. V however was by far, the worst ST movie of em all.

At least the romulans can provide for some good plot material.

-Chris

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Canadria]

Insurrection was a hyped up episode of TNG. To me if I'm going to go see a movie and shell out $10, I expect it to be better than the re-runs I can catch at 3am.

If this one is better than an episode, I will be happy with it, otherwise.

PPPPPtttttttthhhpppttTt!!!!!

------- Rasberries of the world unite!

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Anonymous Coward]

Insurrection was terrible. They attempted to make it humorous but in the process made it out right corny. Picard and Worf singing to "reset" Data? Come on. That's just goofy. I'm a huge TNG fan. Always have been, always will be. But Insurrection sucked.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[the_2nd_coming]

yeah and wasn't that one writen and directed by Shatner?

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[lobsterGun]

didn't that episode end with that hive being BLOW'D UP?

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[the_2nd_coming]

I don't think so.........of cource that "queen had omnipresence so she could have had a few hives

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[pyite69]

I have to agree with this. The Borg movie was perhaps the
biggest disappointment in all of Trek.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Planesdragon]

Sort of. The only misconception you've got is that *all* of the borg is one singular hive, with a single queen as the "avatar" of that hive mind.

I've got to wonder what makes Humans so facinating for the Borg, though... maybe it's that "evolve into higher beings" thing...

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[hardburn]

The whole idea of centralization in the collective, on any level (either for the entire collective, parts of the collective, or individual ships), simply does not fit with how the Borg were presented in TNG.

One exception I will make for this is the transwarp gateways seen in the final episode of Voyager. Those things would likely take an awful lot of resources to build, so it makes sense that even the Borg only have a few of them. Of course, Voyager has other problems with the Borg (and that episode in particular), such as uber-torpedos that destroy cubes in one hit and invincible armor plating. Ho hum, whoppie.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[the_2nd_coming]

actualy, in TNG no one knew what the borg were like, only that you could walk around on the ship until you were percived as a threat and that they could adapt to your Phaser.other than that they were pretty mysterious. even now there internal dynamics are a little foggy......pluse look at wht Data's brother had proven, along with the Hugh experiment, that borg can become independant and command themselfs in small groups independant of the central mind. Just because the Queen died does not mean that the borg Die, it just means now the universe will be filled with billions of rouge borg.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Deslock]

First off, ST sucks in general. Hey, I'm a fan, but let's be honest... go back and watch the movies again. They're not that great (and the episodes are hit and miss too).

That said, I thought ST8 was, for the most part, well done. I didn't like the concept of the Borg queen, her fascination with Picard, or her attempted seduction of Data (very silly, IMHO).

But, those were my only complaints. The plot was actually fairly interesting and it was nice to see a movie on time travel that didn't invlove going to the present!

So, I rank ST8 a close second to ST4. And ST9 was better than expected... yeah it was bad, but it also had a decent plot (for ST). Besides, what do you expect for an odd ST movie? My ranking:

4 ***
8 ***
2 ***
6 ** 1/2
7 ** 1/2
9 ** 1/2
3 **
1 **
5 *

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Minam]

Insurrection was definately one of the best of the ST movies. In an age when movies are steadily moving more and more towards gratuitous sex, violence, and language, Insurrection was refreshingly clean. It had humor, a clean romance, an intriguing premise, and a great mystery with a surprise ending. Call me a prude, or a far-left-winger, but IMO we need more movies like Insurrection -- PG-13 and R ratings are FAR too predominant right now, and I think that reflects negatively on the direction our society is taking.

I honestly hope that Nemesis follows the example of Insurrection, rather than choosing the "easy" path and going PG-13 or (gasp!) R. It is almost always nothing less than laziness on the part of the director if they claim a given movie can't be rated PG. Good scripting, directing, and editing can always result in a winning PG movie -- look at the Star Wars films if you don't believe me.

My 2 cents...

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Millard Fillmore]

Insurrection is definitely one of the better movies, because it is an extended TNG episode. I liked the movie because I liked the show. Funny how that works. I would prefer if they made more movies like that rather than trying to make them appeal to people who didn't watch the show.

Also, Star Trek V was excellent for the first hour, maybe even 2/3 of the film. It's just the last bit that sucks, and that's all people seem to remember.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[noelmc]

I agree with the original poster - insurrection was the best of the lot as far as TNG movies go. Generations was so-so and First Contact could have been so much better but wasn't. Insurrection was great because it had all the stuff I really liked about Trek in it. The human story was great. I'm not sure what First Contact was trying to be? It wasn't a good action movie and didn't have enough edge to be a good 'Good Vs. Evil' movie either.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Anonymous Coward]

The Borg are like a P2P network, instead of a client/server network. There is not one local machine that information is stored on, but many. Anyway, the borg are smart enough to make daily back ups of the queen, and have one offsite copy.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Mr. Slippery]

I'm not sure what First Contact was trying to be? It wasn't a good action movie and didn't have enough edge to be a good 'Good Vs. Evil' movie either.

Believe it or not, sometimes movies can have subtler themes than "blow up stuff" or "good vs. evil".

The most interesting part of First Contact is Picard's obsession with the Borg. You've also got the Borg's "temptation" of Data, and the deconstruction of the myth around Zephram Cochrane...it's a psychologically heavy movie, with a heaping side order of action. Good stuff.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[crawling_chaos]

it just means now the universe will be filled with billions of rouge borg.

Omigod, you mean the Borg assimilated the French ? Someone alert Paris!

On the other hand, Borg food probably improved by several orders of magnitude...

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[erc]

Insurrection was a hyped up episode of TNG. To me if I'm going to go see a movie and shell out $10, I expect it to be better than the re-runs I can catch at 3am.

You must be either female or gay ;) Personally, drooling after Donna Murphy for almost 2 hours made my day...

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[meepzorb]

Not a big ST-V fan, but I must admit it contains my all-time favorite ST quote (from Kirk):

"Excuse me... but why would GOD need a STARSHIP...?"

:M

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Legion303]

Of course good movies can be rated PG. Great movies, on the other hand, tend to deal with life, and life is frequently R-rated. Could Schindler's List have been a PG movie? The network that aired it on television didn't think so.

-Legion

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[dswensen]

-1, Opinion Differs From Collective

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[jedidiah]

Sometimes, life is goofy.

The universe can't always be a shakespearean play. Fiction should not pretense that it is.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[talesout]

Well, considering the attention span of the typical Trekky, they probably forgot that the first 2/3 of the film existed by the time they were watching the last 1/3. You always remember your last impression the most anyway.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Monte]

V however was by far, the worst ST movie of em all.

I have to agree. "V" was pretty bad - none of the old crew, no Federation ships, Klingons, phasers or anything, just these dumb aliens running around dressed as humans. Spock coulda whupped the whole fleet of'em in ten minutes.

It was really hard to see how it even was a Trek movie, but at least it was on TV and I didn't have to pay for a ticket.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Anonymous Coward]

Insurrection was definately one of the best of the ST movies. In an age when movies are steadily moving more and more towards gratuitous sex, violence, and language, Insurrection was refreshingly clean. It had humor, a clean romance, an intriguing premise, and a great mystery with a surprise ending. Call me a prude, or a far-left-winger

I think you mean far-right-winger.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Anonymous Coward]

Clearly you are all on crack again. That was not only funny, but was obviously indended as a joke. Fucking wankers.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[RestiffBard]

wolf 359.

i do believe thats correct. if it is need to get out into the big blue room more often.

as i recall wolf359 was near jupiter.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[omnislash]

Wolf 359 is a real star, the third-closest to Earth, as you can see if you go here.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Miguelito]

Also, Star Trek V was excellent for the first hour, maybe even 2/3 of the film. It's just the last bit that sucks, and that's all people seem to remember.

Funny.. that's my exact feeling for III. I loved the whole returning home damaged, then stealing the Enterprise (ok, so the clunking noises in the Excelsior were cheesy), and finally blowing the enterprise up to save their lives (damn fine effects there). But once they were on the ground on the Genesis planet, and finished watching the Enterprise burn up in the atmosphere... it just goes down the toilet. Trying not to picture Christopher Lloyd in his other parts everytime he speaks in the movie is kinda funny though.

I also think that James Horner's music, especially during the stealing the enterprise bit (and all of ST II) is the best ST music. Don't get me wrong, I like Goldsmith's music a lot too, but I think Horner outdoes Goldsmith. I own the sountracks for 2, 3, 5, 6, Gen, and FC. 2 and 3 are my favorites.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Anonymous Coward]

The only thing I remember about D+D is all the books were filled with "PG-13" drawings of bigchested elf chicks whose nipples burst out of their chainmail. The only conclusion is that Dungeons and Dragons is bad for our children.

Re:Insurrection was BAD?

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

>> it just means now the universe will be filled with
>> billions of rouge borg.
>
> Omigod, you mean the Borg assimilated the French ?
> Someone alert Paris!

Sure, silly!
&lt Fractured Fairy Tales ending approacing! Alert!>

Haven't you ever heard of the "Murders In the Rue Borg"?

Stuart Baird did not direct Tomb Raider

[gorsh]

Although he was a producer and uncredited editor on the film.

Re:Stuart Baird did not direct Tomb Raider

[lobsterGun]

It says a lot about a film when an editor refuses to allow his name to be put into the credits.

Re:Stuart Baird did not direct Tomb Raider

[SGDarkKnight]

as i said before, it states on the paramount site that he served as executive producer on Paramount Pictures' "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider"

Villains...

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, at least it seems that they have their priorities in order. Nothing brings out the best in Star Trek like a deliciously diabolical villain.

Fisrt movie DVD?

[Havokmon]

"BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release."

You mean now the WHOLE 2 hour jouney of spock flying through V'Ger is in there? COOL!

Re:Fisrt movie DVD?

[Anonymous Coward]

Oh my god

how the hell can they say anything was good about any release of this movie. I'd rather watch "Annie" in the movie theater than that movie again.......-gag-

Re:Fisrt movie DVD?

[jayhawk88]

No truth to the rumor that whole little scene was originally ended with the phrase, "My God Jim, it's full of stars!"

Re:Fisrt movie DVD?

[skbenolkin]

LOL. You have to wonder how the people whose attention spans aren't up to ST:TMP standards could ever sit through 2001

Tomb Raider?

[Rombuu]

That guy didn't direct Tomb Raider... that was Simon West... bleh...

Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[nocent]

Someone should start a petition to bring back Wil Wheaton for this ST:TNG movie. Reading this interview gave me a much better impression of him.

Plus, he played for EFF on The Weakest Link!

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[Servo5678]

Actually, they have brought back Wil.

See this link: http://www.trektoday.com/news/301101_01.shtml

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[merlin_jim]

Actually, I think I saw a blurb on wilwheaton.net mentioning that he was talking with them about being in it...

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[Foochar]

According to a statement made by Wil Wheaton at www.wilwheaton.nethe will have at least a small role in the movie. wilwheaton.net is down at the moment so here is what I can recal from his comments. When they taped The Weakest Link episdoe Wil made a comment to Levar Burton about wanting to come back and give the character some closure, but that he didn't feel like Rick Berman and the other producers liked him. Apparently Levar went to bat for Wil because they decided to give him at least a small role. According to Wil he has been fitted for a uniform and has possesion of a script with the confidential stamped in red on the top every page. I would provide links to wil's site, but for some reason Wil has had to put the moose back out front again.

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[the_2nd_coming]

Why a uniform, he would be returning from his experiences with the traveler...I would think he should be a guest not a crew member

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[Foochar]

I think his comment was uniform. Like I said wil has the moose out front so I can't check. He may have said costume or outfit or something like that and not uniform, I can't be 100% sure though. One RUMOR that I have heard bandied about is that there is going to be a wedding and that he may be a guest at the wedding... Like I said before the whole thing is very confidential so at this point a lot of this is just conjecture.

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[bill_mcgonigle]

When last we saw Wesley Crusher, he was on the verge of becoming a full-fledged superhero. He had the ability to freeze time with his mind, and act independent of it. Before that he was able to move the ship across the universe with his mind. Now, if we're going to see a whole Q movie, where Wesley completes his evolution into Q, fine. There's plenty of back story to play with (explaining Q's interest in the Enterprise, Picard as Wesley's father-figure, etc.) but I can't see how Wesley could make a cameo. Now, wrap Will in Romulan makeup, and there you have something. Of course, Tom Paris will have to make an appearance to punch Will for hitting on Roxanne...oops, there I go confusing reality and TV again.

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[the_2nd_coming]

just a 5 minute shot? that would be realy disapointing since he has the power to save another crew member simple by stoping time and such....to much cool power to play with to just make a cameo.

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[Anonymous Coward]

but episodes of Wesley were always so dull. It's true he had powers. The power to put me to sleep as soon as he came on screen.

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[fobbman]

Yeah! Get that CleverNickName guy to get the petition rolling. He seems to know a lot about Wil, and would probably be all for it.

He has mentioned recently that he was looking for something to do so this should fit nicely! /irony>

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[rlwhite]

just a 5 minute shot? that would be realy disapointing since he has the power to save another crew member simple by stoping time and such....to much cool power to play with to just make a cameo.

Which is why he has just a 5 minute cameo. A lot of people hated it enough when he saved the ship regularly, let alone able to resolve the entire movie plot with a word. I liked Wesley despite the way he was nearly ruined, but if Wesley goes with the crew after the wedding scene I'll walk out (unless he has relinquished the powers). You can't logically develop and sustain a plot when a character can instantly resolve it at any moment.

Nonetheless I'm eager to see Wesley again. Does he have some interesting journeys to share with us? Has he given up his powers after many, many "years" of time travel? Has he decided to settle down and lead a normal life? Where is the Traveller who introduced him to "new planes of existence"? Has he had contact with Dr. Crusher and the crew or is he dropping in uninvited? Will there be an explanation for his changed appearance? (Wil Wheaton is no longer a teenager, obviously.)

I don't buy into the bad reviews I've seen floating around. I can't wait.

Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton!

[matrix29]

Someone should start a petition to bring back Wil Wheaton for this ST:TNG movie. Reading this interview [slashdot.org] gave me a much better impression of him.
Plus, he played for EFF [slashdot.org] on The Weakest Link!


I liked the BBSpot.com interview much more. The kid has a sharp sense of humor.

http://www.bbspot.com/Features/2001/10/11_question s_wil.html
BBspot (5): Did you feel like your character suffered from an Oedipus complex in Star Trek:The Next Generation? I mean, your mom was really hot, and your dad died under cloudy circumstances.

Wil: When Wesley's dad died, Wesley was so traumatized, he had to spend many, many nights sleeping in Dr. Crusher's quarters...and the therapeutic sponge baths really helped with the grieving process. Oh, and the oral sex.

Some may be offended, but there's a big fanfic obsession of hot Wesley/Momma boinking and he slyly hit that nail firmly.

First Movie DVD

[Xcruciate]

I think they did a good job on the new FX. Didn't go over the top. but enhanced what was there, and the new stuff blends in well.

good lord

[linuxpng]

Could *anyone* stay awake with Star Trek the Motion Picture? Bad as insurrection? I think not. Granted there hasn't been any pal bald chicks in the new flicks, but that may be a little harsh.

Re:good lord

[digitalsushi]

has anyone seen the new version of this movie? i read something that said that it wasnt really complete when they released it in the 80s, and that with these new effects (and some new scenes maybe? i havent seen it) that the movie is much closer to... "good".

Re:good lord

[hardburn]

I stayed awake for that film, but I wish I hadn't. I haven't seen the new version, though.

Intrestingly, "The Motion Picture" was supposed to be a pilot for a new series. Then "Star Wars" was released and the Star Trek people we're worried that the popularity of Star Wars would overshadow Star Trek, so they rewrote the series pilot as the movie. Many of the other scripts they had written up to that point were eventually turned into TNG episodes.

Re:good lord

[mttlg]

I tried to stay awake through the whole thing, but I failed. The swirling colors and lack of dialogue put me under right away. I just wish I had been that lucky with Insurrection, but I seem to have blocked out those memories, so perhaps all is well after all.

Re:good lord

[SuiteSisterMary]

It is, indeed, much better. What Robert Wise was forced to release in the 70s was infact a rough cut. Now he's had a chance to go back and finish it, and it really shows. And what other movie these days has the guts to have a several minute musical overture before even the title card comes up?

Re:good lord

[Lewis Daggart]

Heh. Remember the collectors addition of the TOS series? Remember how the motion Picture was supposed to have like, 10 minutes of extra footage or something? I watched the movie and could have sworn that the added footage was all put into: More clouds inside VGER!!! Just what we always wanted....

Re:good lord

[jasonbw]

The DVD was an improvement over the original (and all following) release(s), but its still got a bunch of slow parts, and those are still for the most part boring. Im not sure if this new version helped bring it up in the rankings, though.

Re:good lord

[mongoks]

It's a good way to waste a couple of minutes that's for sure. Two minutes of listening to the music whilst flying through space is better than two minutes of watching Insurrection or ST5.

Question:

[big_groo]

I read somewhere that Patrick Stewart doesn't want to do the Trek series anymore, and has had his hands in writing his death into the next movie. I can't find a link for the life of me...anyone else heard anything?

If this is the case, I can't wait to see what direction the franchise takes after this...

Re:Question:

[MisterBlister]

I think you are confusing Patrick Stewart with Brent Spiner (Data). In any case, from what I understand this is intended to be the last full TNG movie...

Re:Question:

[lysurgon]

I wouldn't be surprised. Even though Mr Stuart has gotten faim and acclaim for bringing back Star Trek (he basically launched an entire industry with that classically-trained voice: "engage"), he is a rather serious actor, and serious actors like to take on diverse, challenging, creatively envigorating roles.

Unfortunitely for the rest of us, playing the same space captain for 10+ years kind of takes the "diverse, challenging, creatively envigorating" out of it.

BTW: I caught his Prospero (that's from Shakespeare's Tempest) a couple years back in NYC. Brilliant. If anyone ever has a chance to see Patric Stuart perform anything live (esp Shakespeare), take it. His stage presence is unreal. I really hope he finds more projects to work on in the future.

Re:Question:

[ncc74656]

I read somewhere that Patrick Stewart doesn't want to do the Trek series anymore, and has had his hands in writing his death into the next movie.

...as if a small detail like death has ever kept a Star Trek character from returning...

Re:Question:

[OmegaDan]

hahah mod this man up!

I had an accident where I was legally dead for 5 minutes ... since I saw ST3 when people say "your gonna get yourself killed doing that!" I always reply "I've been dead before."

but nobody gets it :)

Re:Question:

[xTK-421x]

Patrick Stewart will be reprising his one man "A Christmas Carol" in LA and NYC for two weeks in December. All proceeds from the 12/28 performance will be going to a September 11th charity.

Star Trek Captains in Solo Shows

Ticketmaster link for NYC shows

I missed this the last time he did it, so I'm glad to get another opportunity to see him perform.

Insurrection WAS bad

[Anonymous Coward]

Insurrection is the second worst of the movies, slightly better than that 'search for god' nonsense that was number 5. Hey, that's my opinion though. Anyway, it was the series that ruined the Borg by introducing Hugh.

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[digitalsushi]

Insurrection was bad, but, it was funny quite a bit... I think it ranked about as humerous as the 4th one did. I like how they mix it up.

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[hardburn]

Speaking of Hugh, what ever happened to that borg computer virus that was created when they captured Hugh? That's just the sort of thing I would think Star Fleet would put somewhere in the datastores of every federation ship. "Just in case you're trapped 70,000 light years in the Delta quadrant and surrounded by a few hundred Borg cubes, use this."

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[silicon_synapse]

Well I'm sure they would have adapted in a short period of time, and that particular virus would be useless.

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[Anonymous Coward]

I suspect it's more a case of them running out of client access licences... The Redmond collective would've been rubbing their hands in glee

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[Anonymous Coward]

They simply used Norton Antivirus 2489.

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[Anonymous Coward]

Hugh caused the cube and crew on the borg vessel which reclaimed him to all have an identity and they were lost without the collective.. Lore came and helped them and this is how he get's destroyed. It was a season ender and beginner I believe.

Re:Insurrection WAS bad

[Anonymous Coward]

As I remember, the virus was designed to put the Borg into an infinite loop, using more and more resourses to solve an impossible problem. And computers can't debug for an infinite loop. (Side note: if computers can't do it, can we?)

And I imagine that the Next Gen. crew destroyed the virus, because Picard came to (or lost) his senses and decided that genocide wasn't the way humans should do things, especially not in anger or spite.

settin' myself up

[Lurking Grue]

I know I'll get clobbered for this, but I think Insurrection was great. Saw it several times. Bought the DVD and the soundtrack CD. I don't understand the Insurrection-bashing, but it seems to be quite popular. Oh well. Guess I fail that section of the geek-test.

Re:settin' myself up

[Anonymous Coward]

Agreed...
I took about thirty friends from church, mostly non-Trek fans. One of them even sneered when I said "Star Trek." But she loved it, and so did the great majority of the others.

They're all out on DVD...

[The Good Reverend]

BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

All of the films are out on DVD (and have been for a while), they're just not worth buying because they contain no bonus features to speak of. Strange, considering Trek is a franchise that specifically caters to a crowd/fanbase that would love to see behind the scenes, technical, and "making of" documentaries.

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[trash eighty]

well the first film does

i think they're going to re-release all the films with special features and all that other crap. so all the fans will shell out for the same film twice. now thats what i call a franchise!

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[shymog]

Yeah, they're all out now. However, ST: The Motion Picture was released about 3 weeks ago.

It can't be totally devoid of bonus features, being that it has a whole second disc of them.

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[The Good Reverend]

However, ST: The Motion Picture was released about 3 weeks ago.

I'm dumb, and forgot to mention this in my original post. All the films came a couple years ago, without a big deal release or anything special. Interestingly enough, the new version of ST:TMP hasn't been available at many standard locations like Target, K-mart or Walmart (at least around here in Souther California).

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[jonerik]

Word is that all of the other movies will be upgraded to 2-disc sets similar to the new "ST: TMP" set starting in 2002. If anyone's planning on buying the other titles, I'd recommend waiting.

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[geekoid]

they are also fans that will by anything with ST stamped on it.
So why do a lot of bonus features when there going to buy it ANYWAYS? of course after you've made a few million, then release it again with "specialy add-ins",
then again with "new digitized scenes", then again with "new sound quality".

Have you learned nothing from Lucas? ;)

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[Syberghost]

they're just not worth buying because they contain no bonus features to speak of.

Being able to watch the whole movie instead of just a chunk of the middle of the screen is a pretty compelling bonus feature.

Being able to watch the movie several times without it looking worse every time is a nice bonus feature.

Being able to fit all the movies into the space half of them would consume on VHS is a nice bonus feature.

Hell, just the difference in picture quality is nice, if you've got a 50" TV.

Re:They're all out on DVD...

[Anonymous Coward]

The folks over at Paramount probably saw how many copies of Star Wars George Lucas sold on VHS and thought let's try that with DVD. So we already have the VHS copies. So they release one with bare bones, nothing much but the movie and a theatrical trailer. Then they release one with all the extras and a special edition with added scenes, like the 1st movie, then release that on DVD. So we can all have three copies of the same movie, just like Star Wars. Then a new, even better format will come out, hence a fourth purchase of the exact same movie. In the end we can watch the same movie in several different ways: 1. Be old fashion and pop in the VHS, first rewinding it because the last person to watch it didn't. 2. Skip the extra stuff and added scenes and watch it on the "bare bones" DVD. 3. Watch the 10 hours of bonus footage, including the 2 different audio commentaries, 15 different documentaries, all the TV commericals for it and see a bunch of concept art for stuff that wasn't even in the movie.

All the latest rumors and spoilers here..

[xTK-421x]

Visit Corona for the latest movie info..

Coming Attractions - Star Trek 10: Nemesis

Just a warning, spoilers are present..

Oh, it could be.

[TooTallFourThinking]

Can't be as bad as Insurrection.

I remember reading the plot on DarkHorizons and they said it was horrible and I would have to argee.

But here's to hoping!

Yeayyyyyyy

[stux]

I just had to say it, karma be damned :)

Now that LOTR is almost out this gives us something else to lookforward to :)

Yeay..

(you who is not yeaying, go away)

Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Masem]

I've heard rumors to the effect that this is the last planned TNG movie, at least based on the fact that Patrick Stewart no longer wants to be in that role (not that he doesn't dislike it, but he wants to return to stage work). Same rumors suggest that this isn't necessarily the end of the Trek series of movies, and future movies may either take place in the mid-series of DS9 or Voyager, or possibly an aglomeration of plots that would occur after Voyager returns.

Anyone else heard similar? They *are* just internet rumors, after all...

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[GreyyGuy]

I had read on Wil Wheaton's site that Lavar Burton had mentioned that this was the last one.

I think it would be cool to have the next film with the DS9 crew. Thee were a lot of stories left open. Sisko coming back. A whole new relationship with the Changlings. The whole Gamma quadrant. Lots of material.

I don't know what Voyager could do. They got home. End of story. Thank goodness. 7 of 9 aside, I didn't like the show.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[SGDarkKnight]

what i think would make a great movie (if they did it right) would be after voyager gets home, how they deal with the new technology that they brought back with them. do they go after the borg with it, do they destroy the new technology to preserve their temporal prime directive... could be intresting, as long as it didn't have as cheap of an ending as the voyager series had.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Reliant-1864]

They're already talking about making a movie based on the Enterprise series. TOS, TNG, and Enterprise were about exploring. Voyager was about coming home, and DS9 was about gaurding the wormhole. Both Voyager and DS9 have finished their plot arches. I'd be more interested in a DS9 movie over Voyager because what story is left to tell in Voyager? Any movie done with Voyager could also be done with TOS, TNG, and/or Enterprise.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Anonymous Coward]

As much as I'd like to see a DS9 movie, it's not going to happen. Avery Brooks has made it very plain that he never EVER wants anything at all to do with Star Trek again. If memory serves, a lot of negotiating had to take place to get him to even return for the last few seasons.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Giggles Of Doom]

While I hate to see the TNG stuff die, it is about time. All of the characters are getting pretty old (its getting harder and harder to be convinced that Data is an ageless android) and such. Maybe they'll do an Enterprise movie next, hopefully without the crappy intro music. I don't think I'd mind a movie off DS9 or Voy, but the problem is that people have already started to forget about them. It would take a lot of effort to get them back on their feet. As to the last episode of Voy, I thought it was FAR better then the teary eyed, sing songs of hope, slow pan across everyone's face crappy ending of DS9.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[LWolenczak]

This one has been floating around for a while. Stewart has for ages wanted to go back to stage acting. And I must say, he is a damn good stage actor. I have seen him perform at UCLA when I was much younger. Back before I was really even a trekie. He does do it in his spare time some, but I know he is much more interrested in stage acting then doing startrek movies with horrible plots.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Anonymous Coward]

What about a 2 hour 'movie' which is basically just 7 of 9 in various costumes and poses, or just poses? ;>

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Anonymous Coward]

Now he's doing what... IBM ads?

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[tswinzig]

Patrick Stewart no longer wants to be in that role (not that he doesn't dislike it, but he wants to return to stage work).

Where is Data when you need him (for translations)?

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[buckeyeguy]

Well if it is the last TNG movie, why not tie up a few loose ends with the combined possibilities from the first two series?

Two words: Borg Tribbles.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[jeeryg_flashaccess]

I don't think the lenght of a show being off air matters much. If I'm not mistaken the original Star Trek ended and the movie came out years later. DS9 is a better candidate than VGR IMO but i'd rather see a VGR movie. Aside from TNG, VGR was my favorite series. Enterprise is growning on me too. Trip is cool.

Greg

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[newbiescum]

Sisko coming back? Please, let a major character "die" for once in Star Trek. It's already becoming like Marvel Comics with characters dying in one episode/movie and making reappearances in others. Technology is already trivalized in the entire series (writers just invent a whole string of words), don't let the relationships be too (oh, he died. maybe some mystical energy being will bring him back or some weird series of events). IMO, the one last thing that Star Trek has going for it is that it focuses on developing characters.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[GreyyGuy]

Sisko didn't die in the tv show. In the series finale, he did throw himself and Gul Dukat off a cliff but the Prophets saved him and took him ack to their realm to learn.

I agree that the concept of death has been trivialized in comics and many tv shows, but I don't think this is one of those.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[newbiescum]

From what I remember of the series, Sisko did "die" in the sense that he can never come back. The Prophets forewarned him that his relationship with his girlfriend (forget her name at the moment) would end in sadness, and this is what they were alluding to. Personally, I and a lot of other people thought that it was very similiar to Babylon 5's ending where the main character is taken away by some higher ordered being after making a great sacrifice leaving behind a wife and child (where there were numerous other similarities between the 2 shows in the end), but oh well.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[GreyyGuy]

There was a part where he came back and did a Prophet-like visit with his wife saying he would be back in days, weeks, or years, or yesterday since the Prophets weren't linear time dwellers.

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

Well, they can put 7 of 9 onto the crew of any movie. They brought Worf back abord without any problems, and just long enuf for the movie.

Of course the movies won't stop. It just remains to see if they'll continue the stories, or do some kind of "reboot".

Have any of the movies lost money at the box office? What about after VHS/DVD sales, and overseas?

Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie...

[Anonymous Coward]

I always liked those alternate-universe stories.

Too bad it doesn't work in reality (as far as we know.)

Imagine going to an alternative universe where Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman are trailerpark housewife nobodies. Bring 'em here, put 'em to work making love, sweet love in a lesbo film fest, they get rich, we get some good stuff, nothing illegal, all above-board.

Come on, a four-way with them and "Sela Ward" and "7 of 9" would be worth its weight in gold.

IMDB Lists him as a cast member

[Racalac]

The Star Trek: Nemesis IMDB page lists Wil as playing Wesley. Subject to change, but let's hear from Mr. CleverNickName, eh?!

Director?

[NineNine]

It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider.

And this is supposed to be a good thing? If anything, it sounds like this'll be the last Star Trek movie.

Digital Domain

[Syberghost]

If I remember correctly, they're using all Linux for their rendering these days.

Re:Digital Domain

[yatest5]

Whoopi-do. Shall I list all the things Windows is used for as well? Or OS2?

Patrick Stewart gets cloned!

[wrinkledshirt]

The plot, I read somewhere, is about a Picard clone trying to gain control of the Romulan Empire. No word on whether or not the stem cells will be used to help treat the obvious brain damage of the screenwriters of Insurrection.

I hope that...

[Anonymous Coward]

...that if they're bringing Janeway and Wesley in (now, if the rumours are true, why did they make her an admiral so soon?), and considering TPTB apparently want to do something to permit the Data character to exit, why not bring in some other characters for further closure and whatnot?

Like, why not bring back Chief O'Brien? He was part of TNG, too, like Wesley. And then, if this is really the last TNG-cast movie and if TPTB want to keep a Trek movie franchise, why not bring back, say, Lt. Nog, and some other cast members from DS9 and/or VOY?

(Yes, Nog made it to Lt. Watch the DS9 finale again.)

For future movies, why not create a composite cast, like "the best of" from DS9, VOY, even the ones from TNG that want to stick around?

As long as they don't turn the franchise into "The crazy adventures of Grand Negas Rom", I'll be happy.

Re:I hope that...

[trash eighty]

"The crazy adventures of Grand Negas Rom"

now i'd pay to see that =0

Re:I hope that...

[Anonymous Coward]

Here's my Star Trek spec script:

7 of 9 and Bellana Torres get in an argument. To settle the argument they have a mud wrestling match, with Janeway as the referee. By the end of the match, both contestants are totally nude, and muddy, and ready to make love not war. So Janeway films them while they get it on in the shower.

Anyway that's my Star Trek script idea.

I never thought I'd live to see the day!

[Robber Baron]

Someone should start a petition to bring back Wil Wheaton for this ST:TNG movie...

God! Nobody will ever accuse trekkies of not being fickle!

Re:I never thought I'd live to see the day!

[Anonymous Coward]

That is so fucking true :)

It's not strange...It's marketing

[DAldredge]

This way they will sell 2 of each movie..one as soon as it comes out and one when it is rereleased with extended footage

Enterprise movie?

[Merlynnus]

If they release a movie based on Enterprise, will they have to use negative numbers? Star Trek -1: The Klingon Wars

Re:Enterprise movie?

[SamBeckett]

That would be awesome. In this week's episode it was made blatantly obvious that the Enterprise would be the sole cause for the Klingon war! (The temporal cold war with the Sakobahn? saving the ship from destruction!)

Re:Enterprise movie?

[Gaijin42]

Uh. SPOILER!

Some of us don't have UPN, so we have to wait a week or so for it to get to the network. Be nice and mark stuff as spoiler :)

Re:Enterprise movie?

[SEE]

Well, according to the Chronology, the Romulan Wars are due in 2156 -- almost exactly five TV seasons after Enterprise started its mission. How's that for convenient timing?

The what?

[Anonymous Coward]

Excuse me, the what? What the hell is "the Borg mythos"? So far, First Contact was without a doubt the most entertaining of the Next Generation movies.

Re:Nerd Entertainment

[Anonymous Coward]

Loser entertainment:
Excessive masturbation
Collecting welfare because they can't keep a job
Posting stupid comments on Slashdot

ILM?

[Fatal0E]

Since when did Paramount stop handing the SFX over to ILM?

Re:ILM?

[hardburn]

Insurrection was also not an ILM job. Berman has said he wanted the "best bang for the buck", effects-wise.

Re:ILM?

[ncc74656]

Since when did Paramount stop handing the SFX over to ILM?

Long ago in a galaxy far...um, waitaminit...

IIRC, it was either TVH or TUC...probably TVH, as I know they didn't do the FX for TFF (and that was one of the complaints I remember hearing leveled against that movie).

Re:ILM?

[malducin]

They didn't do Insurrection. ILM also didn't work on the first one or number 5 (Final Frontier).

Yes Rick Berman made that comment among another stupid remark. He said that since ILM was working on Episode 1 he didn't want ST to be done by the unit B. Of course that's totally ridiculous, there is no A and B team. Not that Insurrection had terrible FX but the production went screwy, like changing the ending at the last possible minute and of course the great effort to create the FX for it.

Re:ILM?

[AgentUSA]

ILM did the FX for Star Trek 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8.

Re:ILM?

[malducin]

ILM last FX for ST movie was First Contact, here are the ILM supervisors: The Voyage Home was supervised by Michael Lantieri if I remember right, Undiscovered Country by Scott Farrar, Generations by John Knoll, Bill George and Dave Carson, and First Contact by John Knoll and George Murphy. Of course other facilities and supervisor were involved.

Re:ILM?

[Deadbolt]

ILM is pulling 60-hour weeks (so I hear) on finishing Episode II. The new movie, if it's started shooting, needs to be in postproduction by the beginning of February. There simply isn't time.

Plus, if you were at ILM, would you rather work on Episode II or on Star Trek X? (Ideally, you'd want to do them back to back, but if you had to make a choice...)

Re:ILM?

[jonerik]

Plus, if you were at ILM, would you rather work on Episode II or on Star Trek X?

Considering what Episode I was like? Can I think about it and get back to you?

Re:ILM?

[Anonymous Coward]

I heard on Ep1, they had to spend an enormous amount of time on 'special effects' fixing live action shots that Lucus fucked up directing. Doesn't sound too exciting too me.

Worst director ever

[johnjay]

This guy has directed some of the worst movies I have ever seen. They don't even have the redeeming value of being campy. I left Executive Decision in a rage. Not because I was out $6, but because I lost 1 hour my life. Just gone; nothing to show for it.

And this guy did Tomb Raider? Another candidate for worst movie of all time.

If this guy remains in charge, Nemesis is going to suck. I'm really surprised that he can still get work. Someone has got to realize that not even the American public can stomach his crap.

Re:Worst director ever

[Geeky Frignit]

Tomb Raider is no where near close to the worst movie of all time. Remember Battlefield Earth? I think this review sums up how movies can still be made by poor directors. They just have to tell the companies at least I didn't direct Battlefield Earth. (Yes, that is an almost quote from the review.)

Re:Worst director ever

[Anonymous Coward]

If this guy remains in charge, Nemesis is going to suck.

Yeah, probably. Remember that as you and all the other slashdot lemmings line up around the block to buy tickets.

Re:Worst director ever

[hearingaid]

Fortunately (perhaps), directors don't have that much power on a Trek movie set. The big-name actors are the real stars, know it, and throw their weight around accordingly.

The real powers are the writers and the actors. Oh yeah, and Rick Berman. :)

Re:Worst director ever

[johnjay]

Yeah, there probably are worse movies, I just never saw them. I avoided Battlefield Earth because it looked rotten and sort of morally wrong to watch, since I'd be giving $$ to the scientologists.

Nice review, by the way.

Re:Worst director ever

[Anonymous Coward]

"Someone has got to realize that not even the American public can stomach his crap."

I don't know. Don't underestermate the the American public's ability to stomach crap.

Between Hollywood and Dubya, I think the US would be used to it by now...

T-Pol

[yunfat]

If it doesnt have T-pol.... Im not watching it.

Re:T-Pol

[Strange_Attractor]

Yeah, that would be two points in its favor...

Re:T-Pol

[SGDarkKnight]

Actually the name is spelt T'Pol. One of the funny things is on the official web site it says her age is unknown, but I know in either the last episode or the episode before it she actually stated her age as 127 or something around there. Trip had asked her about her age.

Hey, I liked Insurrection!

[Planesdragon]

It was a Star Trek Episode, just like ST II-IV were. I actually felt that it was *more* of a Star Trek flick than First Contact, and right up there with Generations.

Of course, Star Trek alternates between "movies that are Star Trek" and "Star Trek that happens to be a movie." And that means that X will be like "First Contact", "The Undiscoveredy Coutnry", "The Wrath of Khan", and all the other even-numbered movies.

I look foward to it.

Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection!

[Tsian]

Yes, which are generally considered good. Unlike the odd movies which have such shining gems as Shatner Directing and Star Trek I: The Epic

Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection!

[Cutriss]

I liked Insurrection a lot too...but I think that the popularity of a Star Trek is determined by space battles (Though even Space Battles couldn't save ST5, or "Star Trek V: The Wrath of God". Think about it.

Everyone loves ST2, ST6, ST7 (kinda), and ST8. I don't know how the even number rule even TRIES to apply to ST4...

Personally? I rank them this way: ST2,ST3,ST6,ST9,ST7,ST1,ST4,ST8,ST5. What can I say? It seems like everyone seems to forget Star Trek III when they say "This movie sucks!" or "This movie rocks!". It's got your space battles, cocky Kirk, fistfights with Christopher Lloyd as a Klingon, subterfuge at Starfleet HQ, and even Yellow Alerts in Space Dock!

"Bridge, this is the captain...How do you have a yellow alert in space dock?" "Sir! Someone is stealing the Enterprise!"

Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection!

[hearingaid]

Trek IV was the most commercially successful of the entire series. It's still the movie with the most mainstream popularity.

Watching it now... it's so eighties, yes. It's like a cross between Ferris Bueller and Star Trek. :)

All the trekkies whined when Trek III came out, because Trek II's ending was Poignant and III ruined it, or something. :) (I disliked II, mostly because of its horrendously contrived storyline. Drunks in space. That's all I can say.)

Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection!

[Anonymous Coward]

Furthermore, 'officially' playing Star Trek for kitch did bring in non-core fans, but it was probably a bad move for the rest of the series. Nobody really took any of the classic trek movies seriously after that (or were confused why they weren't playing Spock up as a goofball.)

TPTB? What's that?

[Strange_Attractor]

See subject line.

The secret

[bluecalix]

When will we finally learn the Secret Of Vulcan Fury?

Re:The secret

[SuiteSisterMary]

I was SO pissed when they shitcanned that game, it's not funny.

Just some more info

[Jugalator]

As always, don't forget to check out the plot on IMDb

... and here's something for the trekkies out there to wet their appetite. :-)

The dialogue below should be considered a spoiler !

GEORDI
He just likes things the way he likes them..... (he looks at her, smiles) ..... Of course, so do I.

He kisses her gently as Worf comes to them. Poor Worf is still suffering a bit from the bachelor party. He plops down beside them.

WORF
Romulan Ale should be illegal.

GEORDI
It is.

WORF
Then it should be more illegal.

Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[toupsie]

The last thing in the world we could want to see is Wil Wheaton's career suffer. We need a petition to urge the producers of this future flop not to hire Wil Wheaton. After reading his website and responses to questions on Slashdot, I started to really like this guy and learned that he is not the dweeb I once imagined. We all know this movie will be a boring morality play where the Prime Directive will be violated during a temporal distortion caused by Data's emotion chip malfunctioning after having a "human" moment with Jorde's visor in the privacy of the holodeck.

However, I hope every scene is filled with Brent Spinner. After that "Ol' Yellow Eyes is Back" album, he deserves to spend the rest of his life having to listen to plot flaws while signing autographs for socially-retarded Acne cream test subjects. Also, I hope that they make Marina Sirtis cover up. At her present age, they must be bouncing off her knees now.

Captain Archer owns Captain Picard!

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[vinnythenose]

It kind of bothers me how Data is still showing up. I think it's getting very obvious that the actor playing the android is aging, and well androids don't age. Or is this dealing with his quest for humanity?

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[Tassleman]

Supposedly they are building into the script a mini-crisis for data where he gets a "new look" that will help deal with this plot hole.

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[Anonymous Coward]

Cold - very cold.

Sirtis is 41 - hardly old (That is, unless you still can't legally drive and have to get you're Mom's permission to stay up on a school night).

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[Mr. Neutron]

Personally, I think Wil Wheaton's best work was on Family Ties, as Jennifer's jock boyfriend.

Wil Wheaton and Tina Yothers were a winning combination, if ever there was one.

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[Rude Turnip]

He had such a *cute* way of saying "Indians."

IHN-dians

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[buckeyeguy]

Also, I hope that they make Marina Sirtis cover up. At her present age, they must be bouncing off her knees now.

But that's Sci-fi! Suspension of disbelief... and knockers that defy gravity (hey, if Sigourney Weaver can pull it off in Galaxy Quest, certainly Marina Sirtis can have one last go-round on the big screen). Surely the future has miracle bras, etc. for the women that want them... externally adjustable implants? Hmm, maybe this new Vulcan on Enterprise will explore *that* strange new world for us...

Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career!

[drwiii]

The sign on the front of http://www.wilwheaton.net/ says:

WIL WHEATON DOT NET
is temporarily closed, due to massive technical difficulties.
The moose out front should have told you.
Please check back later today.

Guess Wesley couldn't save the day this time, eh?!?

This movie is supposed to suck

[ShieldWolf]

All those fans who have read the leaked script say it stinks to high-heaven. I read the synopsis and it sounds REALLY BAD. I mean CLONING? God how ripped from the headlines (and Star Wars) can you get. They set out to try and reach Wrath of Khan, but they blew it by not having a good bad-guy, I mean bring back someone of merit from the show for godsakes. I think this one will break the even/odd streak and could very well spell the end of ST movies. Why they green-lit this script is a mystery, check out aintitcoolnews.com for more info or try any ST fan sites.

Look out everyone this one is going to BLOW!

Re:This movie is supposed to suck

[Anonymous Coward]

I read the synopsis and it sounds REALLY BAD. I mean CLONING? God how ripped from the headlines (and Star Wars) can you get.
>

Would you prefer "Star Trek, Attack of the Clones"?

I think not. I'll probably enjoy this movie much more.

Woohoo!

[glowingspleen]

Man, I can't wait for the 13th movie in which Patrick Stewart's corpse will play a decaying equestrian-mutated Picard.

The tentative title is "Beating a Dead Horse Captain"

Re:Woohoo!

[Neon Spiral Injector]

Actually it isn't his corpse, just his aged body suffering from cronic laryngitis. He is imprisioned in a dungon on the Romulan homeworld being tortured by Sela played by Denise Crosby.

But you have the title right.

I love Star Trek, but I'm skeptical

[Captain_Frisk]

It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider.

Were any of these movies worth watching? TNG was amazing, but so far the movies have been pretty sad.

You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[Haeleth]

There I was thinking that one bought them in order to be able to watch the film at will, with surround sound and a high-resolution picture. Silly me.

Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[The Good Reverend]

There I was thinking that one bought them in order to be able to watch the film at will, with surround sound and a high-resolution picture. Silly me.

I hope you're trolling. The appeal of the DVD is not only in the quality of the film, but in the scene access and ability to pack on extras that couldn't be easily integrated with a VHS copy, such as director/actor commentary, multiple angles (for you porn fans out there) and language selection.

Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[LordNimon]

I hope you're trolling.

I don't think he is, and I agree with him. I own four DVDs, and the sole reason I own them is so that I can watch those movies whenever I want. The extras mean nothing to me. You should not be shocked by this.

Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[The Good Reverend]

...the sole reason I own them is so that I can watch those movies whenever I want. The extras mean nothing to me. You should not be shocked by this.

I'm not shocked, really, but surprised. You've been able to watch a movie whenever you want for the last 20 years with VHS. That's nothing new. While I understand that some people don't care about features, it really is one of the main reasons DVD is popular.

Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[Anonymous Coward]

DVD's resolution advantage (especially anamorphic discs with a widescreen television) is worth it for any movie, regardless of the special features. I think I may have played with the special features on a few discs, but I buy them for the movie. I own most of the Star Trek movies for that very reason: I like the movies, and DVDs are quite superior than VHS.

Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[reverius]

I own about ten DVD's, and have never seen the extras. I have absolutely no interest in how the movie was made, or some stupid little "game" they can put on a DVD about it... I only want to watch the movie. And I want it to look and sound great, which it does. :)

Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features?

[Anonymous Coward]

Ilea walks around in some damned hot fu**-me high heels in ST:TMP. Does the DVD-quality allow a decent enough picture that you could "get busy" with some hot foot-n-shoe detail?

I remember seeing that in the theater before most of you were born and thinking some day...some day.

I'd really like to honor her passing, if you know what i mean...send one half way up the flagpole, so to speak.

Re:TPTB? What's that?

[nigelc]

"The Powers That Be"

Sometimes refers to the suits at Paramount, who tend to make decisions based on their view of economic reality or business sense.

Executive Decision was Bad?!?!?!???

[Strange_Attractor]

C'mon - how can you not love a movie that kills off Steven Seagal 1/2 hour in? I almost dance a jig in the aisle...

No, because...

[Jugalator]

Nah, that just happen after 4,294,967,296. Come on, anyone knows that.

Re:TPTB? What's that?

[Strange_Attractor]

Thanks! And nice sig - grabbed my eye ("sumpin's weird!"), and it took a moment to realize that Klaatu'd been replaced...

Stuart Baird didn't direct Tomb Raider...

[Anonymous Coward]

Simon West did!

The Title Should Be...

[AmazingDisgrace23]

Star Trek: The Motionless Picture

Re:The Title Should Be...

[Havokmon]

No no no... It's The SLOW Motion Picture.

But I did like it, I was a kid when I first saw it, and there were plenty of potty breaks.

Re:The Title Should Be...

[LordNimon]

No, it's "Star Trek: The Motion Sickness"

Stuart Baird's movies have been terrible.

[idealego]

According to imdb.com
6.4 Executive Decision
5.5 US Marshals
6.2 Tomb Raider

So it looks like we can't expect much from the next Star Trek unfortunately.

Re:Stuart Baird's movies have been terrible.

[Anonymous Coward]

So it looks like we can't expect much from the next Star Trek unfortunately.

Yeah, but I bet you'll pay to see it anyway.

ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie:

[cosmo7]

i'd have something go wrong on the holodeck that would keep the ship in a time loop. the bad aliens would turn out to be good guys and vice versa. everyone would get really old very quickly because of a space phenomenon and would then go mad. and turn into lizards. and then meet god. in the end it would all turn out to be a romulan plot. new uniforms please!

Re:ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie:

[Martel]

wow, i think you hit every star trek plot known to man in record time.

Re:ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie:

[llamalicious]

don't forget, said space phenomena should also make the crew lose all sense of judgement and become "drunk"

:)

Re:ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie:

[Lewis Daggart]

Then of course theres the TOS plot line: At some point they need to go down to the planet to find out whats going on. Kirk, Spock and Bones go left, security go right, you hear a scream. Command crew run to security officers. One of the security officers is on the ground. Doctor studies him. "He's dead Jim." DA DA!
(comercial break)
Captain looks at the living officer. "How did it happen?"
"(something came out of there and attacked, a strange plant blew up in his face, he was run through by a large runnaway commidor 64.. the more rediculous the better)" Spock looks up from the tricorder he's been studiing.
"Captain I am reading (something) over (somewhere)"
This is where the plot diverges. Either some or all of them are taken captive or something infects one of the command crew, THEN some or all of them are taken captive. Almost always, something will prevent them from returning to the ship Usually because they've been taken captive at some point). Kirk and Spock come up with some rediculously funny way to get out, and aprehend the person/people responsible for whatever happened. The episode ends with Kirk making some comment, Bones making some snide remark about it, Spock either entering into a point counterpoint with bones, or quoting the bible, and Kirk smiling and making another comment, this time either about the "innate goodness of humanity" or making polite fun of Spocks comment.

Re:ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie:

[geekoid]

you remember that ST, where some thing tries to take over he ship...

Why .. does .. God .. need .. a .. starship?

[Anonymous Coward]

Star Trek V: The Search for Toupees

Egad it was bad.

I AM my pain.

No, you're our pain, Captain

Re:Why .. does .. God .. need .. a .. starship?

[Anonymous Coward]

Join with me. Share your pain.

Insurrection wasn't bad...

[irishmikev]

C'mon...let's not beat up on Insurrection. First of all, most people who go to see Star Trek films are a self-selected audience. We'll go see any Star Trek movie because it's as obligatory as filing your taxes every year. Anything after First Contact that didn't have as much action was bound to get criticized, and Insurrection centered around a theme that has produced some of the best episodes of TNG, "something rotten in the federation". Just my opinion.

Nudity...

[Jugalator]

Since the next Bond movie is supposed to have a scene with female nudity, I'll boycott this one if it don't have a shower scene with Seven of Nine. Regardless if it fits in the story or not!

But seriously, what do you feel about nudity in ST movies? Does it belong there? Or does it make the movie anti-ST and/or lower the quality?

Re:Nudity...

[underbider]

wasn't there some in the Final Frontier? With Uhura?

Re:Nudity...

[Anonymous Coward]

Since the next Bond movie is supposed to have a scene with female nudity...

Whered you hear that? A quick search of E! Online and IMDb doesn't find anything...

Re:Nudity...

[Anonymous Coward]

There already is a Bond movie with female nudity in itThe Living Daylights. But it probably depends on where you saw it. I saw it in the Netherlands and the scene where Bond enters the hotel room where General Pushkin's wife (girlfriend?) is getting dressed then General Pushkin (John Rhys-Davies) enters, that woman is topless for a moment. In the American edit of the movie there is an awkwardly long pause of her not topless in the same scene; the cut is awkward because the sound doesn't seem to correspond to the image for a moment. I'm guessing this is at or near where the woman was topless in the European cut I saw in the Netherlands theatre I went to.

Re:Nudity...

[Bender Unit 22]

None thanks,
not because I don't like it, in fact i am naked right now. :*).
No seriously, nudity in most commercial American movies always seems like something that is put in there to score cheap points, yet it is always limited to that it wont suffer in the ratings, which I guess is why it makes it look stupid and unfitting.

Re:Nudity...

[zericm]

But seriously, what do you feel about nudity in ST movies? Does it belong there? Or does it make the movie anti-ST and/or lower the quality?

Hmmm... If Berman and Braga could find a way to slip in nudity, the would do so. Those two are marketing to 13 year old boys. The last two series have contained women who paint their costums on. And, let's not forget the post-recon/pre-coital love goop smeared all over T'Pol.

eric

Re:Nudity...

[Anonymous Coward]

Not just 13 year old boys -- everyone who's emotionally 13 years old. Like say most Star Trek fans (except for the ones who overlooked that Kirk would bang a bimbo each week).

Re:Nudity...

[Anonymous Coward]

And, let's not forget the post-recon/pre-coital love goop smeared all over T'Pol.

Dear God, how could we??

That's the high point of the new series so far.

Re:Nudity...

[Pseudonym]

The hot tub scene didn't do anything for Insurrection, if that's what you meant.

Re:Nudity...

[Anonymous Coward]

I saw that movie exactly once, in the theatre on first release, in America. I saw juggs; I remember them well 'cause I was about 17. FWIW.

Re:Nudity...

[Anonymous Coward]

Then perhaps it is just the theatrical release that has been recut? If so, why? I do not understand.

Re:Nudity...

[jandrese]

I thought Uhura's nude scene was handled pretty nicely. I was just laughing my ass off once these stupid horny guards realized that not only is it a blatently obvious trap, but they were lusting after someone old enough to be their grandmother...

BTW, I'm Taco the entertainment whore...

[TZA14a]

BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

Well, we might HATE the MPAA and their way of doing business, but of course that doesn't mean we shouldn't buy all the shiny new DVDs they release...

I hate to repeat myself, but people who complain about the MPAA and RIAA all the time, but still rush out to buy every new CD or DVD they think they could like need some serious attitude adjustment.

Even Good, Odd Bad

[uslinux.net]

I'm sure this will result in a flame war and several Troll mods, but here it goes...

As someone who likes Sci-Fi and Star Trek, but is NOT a trekkie, I'd like to note that the even numbered Trek movies are good, and the odd ones are not that good (I won't say "bad", but they could be better).

1: Long, too detailed
2: Khan was sooo evil. Coolness
3: A lame excuse to bring Spock back
4: Whales. Time Travel. Spock using colorful metaphors. Cool
5: Great Barrier? Lame
6: Klingons and Federation make peace. Cool
7: Generations. 10 minutes of the Enterprise crashing. Twice. Need I say more.
8: Star Trek "history". Nifty plot, cool movie
9: Insurrection was just bad. 'Nuff Said.

That said, Star Trek X will rock. Flame away.

The Data Mythos

[resonator]

They're going to have to go through extensive effort to maintain Brent Spiner's appearance as the immortal android Data and not some dude in his 50's with crows feet and a middle aged gut.

Re:The Data Mythos

[Lewis Daggart]

Heh heh.. They could clame that his age is due to the realism of how he was built. His ability to grow his hair, to cry, etc. He could clam that he modified his appearance because, "I have found that my aquaintences find it slightly disconcerting that I have shown little visible sign of aging over the past 50 years."

Re:The Data Mythos

[asincero]

In the ST:TNG where Data is introduced to his android mother, Data explains that her body has the ability to appear to age just like his body can. So they already explained why Data appears to age.

- Arcadio

Hey, now...

[Fezzik]

Mr. Convenient-Mexican-Food-Product, stop with the blatant editorializing. Both I and my brother, die-hard trekkies extraordinaire (at least, to the point of watching the TV shows a lot :] ) really liked Insurrection. I think it's my brother's favorite ST movie (/flame on). Not that I expect to convince anyone else, but just a tip that some people out there liked that movie...

Tie-in with Enterprise and Suliban?

[Mr. Neutron]

Is it just me, or does it seem like the Future Dude directing the Suliban on Enterprise is a Romulan? Maybe we'll get to see the 24th Century theater of the "temporal cold war".

Also, it wouldn't be a Star Trek movie without time travel. *sigh*

Re:Tie-in with Enterprise and Suliban?

[Lewis Daggart]

Yeah, every time I see the guy, I could swear that he's a romulan..probably also some bigshot in the vulcan government consitering noone knows what romulans look like yet.
The problem with having a movie with the Temporal Cold war, nomatter how cool that would be..is that the guy (if you choose to believe him) clames to have come from 900 years in the (Enterprise timeline) future. That would mean 800 years for TOS and I think 725 for Next Gen... Keep it up though, and we should catch up with the temporal cold war in (real timeline) about Twenty Years during the production of Startrek: We Ran Out of Damn Names

Re:Tie-in with Enterprise and Suliban?

[Mr. Neutron]

The thing about a temporal cold war is that it can be fought in many difference centuries at once. The guy may be from the 29th century, but that doesn't mean he's not operating in the 24th century, as well as Ancient Byzantium.

Still, the two best Trek movies (II and VI) had no time travel whatsoever, and I hope X follows that example.

Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even number!

[sterno]

Let's look at the brief history:

Star Trek I - Rather cheezy looking and overall not that good of a movie

Star Trek II - KHAAAAAAAAAN! Still one of the best Start Trek movies

Star Trek III - The search for spock. It had some good moments but overall kinda dull. Not bad, but not great

Star Trek IV - Okay, the environmentalism was layed on thick, but overall a very different style from the other movies (much more humor), and quite a bit of fun

Star Trek V - Today red shirted ensigns we are going to go find God on some funky planet in the middle of nowhere. Set phasers on CRAP!

Start Trek VI - My personal favorite. Lots of good drama between Federation and the Klingons. The big fairwell for most of the original cast.

Star Trek VII - a crossover between the old and new, and the movie clearly suffered for trying to force that.

Star Trek VIII - We get to see the old federation, a borg trying to seduce Data, and overall a fun and action packed movie.

Star Trek VIX - Ummmm.. what was this movie again. I know I saw it, but I don't recall it having anything worth remembering. Something about somebody rebelling I think but I forget.

So, back to an even number and so we can reasonably assume it will be good. It seems like they screw up, and then work hard to get the next one right. Then they rest on their laurels and screw up again.

George Harrison, Beatle, Dead at 58

[Anonymous Coward]

I just heard some sad news on talk radio - former Beatle writer George Harrison was found dead in his Los Angeles home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly a British icon.

Well, the even numbers used to be better...

[Anonymous Coward]

"It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider."

2 was good.
4 was funny.
6 was good.
8 was good when it wasn't trying to be funny.

But #10 will be directed by -- the guy who screwed up Tomb Raider even worse than the script itself. Um, "Ehhhwwww."

Wolf 359

[josquint]

Don't ask me how i remever that..

Re:Wolf 359

[PyroMosh]

Perhaps it's because Wolf 359 is the third closest star to our solar system?

Re:Wolf 359

[PyroMosh]

Damn, link didn't work. I did a preview and everything...

Wolf 359

Digital Domain should not be listed for LOTR

[tswinzig]

I know you have a boner for SFX companies that use Linux, but Digital Domain only did a few FX shots for LOTR. To list LOTR as one of "their" SFX films is a bit much. Here's a quote directly from lordoftherings.net:

Peter Jackson and his team not only created a physical Middle-earth, they also designed an entirely digital universe for The Lord of The Rings trilogy. This staggeringly intensive, behind-the-scenes work was carried out by WETA Digital. The New Zealand based F/X company assembled a crack team of computer artists, key frame animators, modelers, digital paint artists, motion editors, compositors and software engineers, among others, to devote years of their lives to creating never-before-seen effects.

Re:Digital Domain should not be listed for LOTR

[JPerler]

One might note, to those not famaliar with Peter Jackson or Weta FX, that Weta is Peter Jacksons company.

Weta was established to do the CG for Heavenly Creatures, arguably Jackson's first non-low-budget gore movie. Next was The Frighteners, which heavily used CG and Weta was awarded for its skills.

Anyway. I kinda know coming from NZ and having Weta FX (and for that matter, Jackson) 5 minutes down the road.

JP

Deploy manual steering... lameness

[Martel]

Speaking on Insurrection...
who the HELL let them get away with having a thrustmaster joystick pop out of center of the bridge??

Re:Deploy manual steering... lameness

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually, that was a Gravis Joysick, one of the earlier firebirds.

They could have at least designed a prop we wouldn't recognize.

not directed by Frakes?

[kraada]

I recall Brent Spiner (Data) previously saying that he would only do it again if Frakes (Riker) was directing . . . does this mean we have no data, or they've somehow managed to strongarm him (!?!) into acting under another director for just one more movie?
Because, for those of you who don't know, Spiner is getting quite old, and as data has to look ilke he doesn't age, it's a hell of a lot of makeup there . . .

Take the Dr Who approach...

[Tassach]

You could always have Data involved in some horrible, disfiguring accident (Say, getting shot in the face with a Romulan disruptor), necessitating that he be repaired. This could be used either to give Spiner a different look, or allow another actor to play the role.

They could also pick up the thread from Insurrection, where the Borg queen gave him human skin. They could have Data re-create this procedure and give himself a new skin, which is then subject to aging.

Re:Take the Dr Who approach...

[AnalogBoy]

This will be the last movie, according to several sources.

Re:Take the Dr Who approach...

[Delphis]

They could also pick up the thread from Insurrection, where the Borg queen gave him human skin.

Or First Contact, as the case may be.

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[Anonymous Coward]

"Star Trek VIX - Ummmm.. what was this movie again. I know I saw it, but I don't recall it having anything worth remembering. Something about somebody rebelling I think but I forget."

I think it's two hours of Riker shaving his beard off and Worf getting a zit.

It's going to suck. Big time.

[artemis67]

But don't take my word for it. Here, read this script review.

-----

Re:It's going to suck. Big time.

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah? Who cares? You'll see it anyway.

Re:It's going to suck. Big time.

[artemis67]

Yeah? Who cares? You'll see it anyway.

That's the sad part. If only it weren't for this damn Geek Code that says I must watch every Star Trek movie and TV show that comes out... sigh

-----

Re:It's going to suck. Big time.

[Bob The Cowboy]

what are you talking about? I don't think that site is real... or at least its reviews are subject to question.

If you look right below the ST 'review' you'll see one for 13 Ghosts, (which claims its good - as if that wasn't enough evidence to show its full of it)... but also it claims that:

"a Great finale where Maggie, Rafkin, and Kalina try to save Bobby from a glass elevator that is rigged to explode and destroy the house."

Well... after seeing the movie, I must have missed that part. Especially since "Kalina" died....

So anyways... disregard the above as a troll.

Bill

Re:It's going to suck. Big time.

[GriffX]

Ahh... come on. It was probably NOT a final draft (all early drafts of big movies suck), and that writer has a huge hate-on for Rick Berman. Berman produced 'First Contact', and that rocked, no?

At least the titles of Star Trek films aren't bad.

[weave]

Can you imagine The Attack of the Klingons or The Romulan Menace.

And as annoying as Wesley might have been, he's no C3P0....

Crazy Wacky Zany Adventures of G.N. Rom

[Anonymous Coward]

Naw. It would have to be "The Wacky Adventures of Grand Negas Rom" before I'd pay. Although, I would pay matinee prices to see the Zany Adventures.

:)

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[poeman]

Um, not to be picky (OK, I'm being picky)

VIX is not 9 - 9 is IX
VIX is 59

Let's all learn our basic Roman Numerals

I - 1
V - 5
X - 10
L - 50
C - 100
D - 500
M - 1000

Rule: no more than 3 of any thing is put together, otherwise, you just put 1 of these suckers before the next largest to get 4.

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[TheShadow]

VIX - Umm... what roman numeral is that exactly? 10 - 6? or 5 + 9 - 1?

No wonder we switched to arabic decimals....

Good/Bad Even/Odd Star Trek movies

[MythosTraecer]

Actually, the correct formula for determining whether a Star Trek movie is good or bad was flushed out by Brunching Shuttlecocks in their review of Insurrection. Obviously, it's too long to repost here, but is highly accurate (or at least will at least make you smile).

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[poeman]

OK, before someone else points it out, VIX is not 59, it's not even a legal number.

59 would be LIX

sorry,

Alvin...

give him an EVIL role

[mr.ska]

To hell with the goody-two-shoes know-it-all Wesley Crusher. Slap some forehead makup on Wil and give him an EVIL role. I'll bet, properly motivated, he could make a helluva Romulan Sub-Commander, or Klingon Lieutenant.

After all, if he can hold his own with Queen Ice Bitch Anne (WL), he should have NO trouble stirring it up with the pissant Federation.

Whaddya say, Wil?

Re:give him an EVIL role

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, he didn't spend eight years in fricking EVIL medical school for nothing!

Re:At least the titles of Star Trek films aren't b

[Lewis Daggart]

Nope, he isn't.. He's Jarr Jarr

Plot Source?

[Anonymous Coward]

Did anyone see Trekkies? Isn't Nemesis the brain child of one of the kids from Trekkies? I recall he wrote part of it and did a ton of cgi scenes on his home computer.

Re:Plot Source?

[Anonymous Coward]

Yea, could someone give us a line about this??? I was laughing my ass off when I saw that movie. I though, "Yea, they'll accept a script for a feature film from a deranged fan *cough psycho cough*"

That kid's script was definately called "Nemesis"...anyone know the connection

Re:Plot Source?

[zgeist]

Hey, I was thinking the same thing....his whole ST club was based on the idea of a space station called Nemesis and he did have a script and some cgi stuff he had done on computer. He even designed a special uniform.

That movie was great. I don't know who was the most twisted person in that movie - the woman who wore her Star Trek uniform while she served on the Whitewater jury or the guy who built the "working" version of Pike's wheelchair.

Some other things of note -

1. Nothing is more indicative to me of the end of the Dot.com era that many comments in this venue, supposedly composed of serious internet nerds, support the idea of Wesley Crusher being written INTO a Star Trek movie. Today, for me, the Internet as we once new it finally died.

2. While the 3rd movie generally sucked, it does contain what I think is William Shatner's greatest moment of over acting. When Kirk's son is killed, Kirk's reaction is greater than the actually struggle in which his son was killed. It's very funny and worth checking out again if you get a chance. Watch it and you'll see how the opening scene, when the mother is informed of her son's death, in Saving Private Ryan should have been played.

3. I'm all for other Star Trek characters from the other show's getting into the movies - particularly if it's 7 of 9. Boston Public is ok but school teachers just don't wear enough skin-tight lycra with 5 inch heels to satisfy me.

4. Wouldn't you hate to be the guy that has to clean up Quark's fantasy holo-suites?

5 When are we going to learn about the 24 century technology which most intrigues me - toilets? Just how does that work? You think about the stuff the Japeneese have today and when you extrapolate that into the 24 century it's just mind-boggling. Personally, I think there ought to be some transporter type of device that let's you just do it in your pants and then the transporter is activated and takes it all away and wipes you clean. Hell, go a step farther and have a device that actually removes the waste in your colon and bladder without ever having to actually relieve yourself - how cool would that be. It could be just like a transporter, you step in, get zapped in place by the transporter but special filters kick in and you rematarialize sans waste products. It wouldn't be all that different from the other biological filters the transporter has.

6. Actually, the "Further Adventures of Grand Negas Rom" sounds kinda a cool to me.

Statement from wilwheaton.net:

[artemis67]

"When I did Weakest Link, I stood next to LeVar," Wheaton said on his website, in a post earlier this evening. "We were talking during the commercials, and I said to him that I really missed them. He said to me that I should be in the movie, especially since it's going to be the last TNG movie. I told him that I would love to be in it, but I really thought that Berman and company really didn't like me. He seemed surprised, and he told me that he was going to call Rick the next morning, and suggest to him that I be in the movie, at least as a cameo. I thought that would be really cool, and told him so.

"Last week, on Friday, my agent called me to let me know that there was an offer from Paramount to reprise the role of Wesley Crusher in Star Trek X. We just needed to work out the details.

"So we spent some time negotiating it, and --get this-- Rick Berman told my agent that he was 'very pleased' that I was going to be in the movie!

"I am really excited about this for three reasons:

* I am going to get to work with my friends again.
* Wesley Crusher will have some real closure, finally.
* For the last 5 years, at least, everywhere I go, fans ask me if I'm going to be in a movie, and what happened to Wesley, and I can honestly say that I'm doing this for the fans, because it will be so damn cool to see all of us together again.

"WHEEE!"

-----

Re:Statement from wilwheaton.net:

[toupsie]

Wesley Crusher in Star Trek X

Has everyone jumped on the 'X' bandwagon now that Apple has labeled their next generation operating system, OS X? First it was Microsoft, now its Wesley Crusher!

Then again, the Nation of Islam might state Apple stole it from Malcom X.

Re:Statement from wilwheaton.net:

[GenetixSW]

Nope. It just has to do with Roman numerals. It's fitting in this case, because we had Star Trek [I, II, III, IV, V, VI, (VII), (VIII), (IX)]. They're just continuing the trend. Granted, the last three didn't quite have numerals in their names, but it makes sense, that this one become Star Trek X.

Re:Statement from wilwheaton.net:

[Codifex Maximus]

>Has everyone jumped on the 'X' bandwagon now

I've wondered that m'self. Seems Microsoft and Apple are both trying to identify themselves with the letter X. I can understand Apple beings as it is their 10'th iteration of OS but Microsoft X-Box? Hmm...

And another thing, I've noticed alot of references and appearances of penguins lately. Many of them have nothing to do with Linux but... there sure are alot of penguins in the media these days.

Whales sucked!

[Morocco Mole]

4)Whales?

--> That was, is, and will always be the LAMEST plot I've ever heard of

Personally I liked Khan the best, and I am in the rare bunch that really really liked the first movie too. I loved TNG the series but I haven't really liked any of the TNG movies.

One thing I would really like to see is a large scale battle. I'd love to see a battle scene on the scale of the battle we didn't get to see when the Borg stomped the Federation while on the way to sector 001.

I'd like to see a plot where the movie opens with tensions very high on the Romulan neutral zone. So high that the Enterprise gets recalled to a Starbase for a "refit". To our surprise we see the saucer section replaced with a "battle saucer" section; a big gun runs through the center of it and the rest of the saucer is devoted to carrying troops, equipment, and a mobile hospital. Don't get me wrong - I don't want a dumb action flick. I want an intelligent plot line that is heavy on how the TNG crew does the strategy/tactics and execution of a large scale battle. I thnk that would be really cool...

--Richard

Re:Whales sucked!

[rianpie]

Redemption? IV was the source of one great geek scene: Scotty talking into the computer mouse "Computer? Hello, computer?" -"Just..use the keyboard" "A keyboard, how quaint"

Re:Whales sucked!

[Anonymous Coward]

I thought of ST4 more as a comedy than a serious movie. How can you take a movie seriously when it's plot is "an alien spacecraft is destroying Earth, and an outlaw captain must travel back in time to bring back 2 whales to save it."? The lame plot was just an excuse for a bunch of (usually funny) jokes.

OOOOOO, Got a great Theory

[the_2nd_coming]

The romulans and the federation get into some conflict and wesly jumps in and stops time, like he did when the Cheroky(sp?) started to fight with the Cardasians, and some how resolves there diffrences

Re:OOOOOO, Got a great Theory

[Anonymous Coward]

As much of a bone I have to pick with the recent
writers(TNG onward,unimpressive phasers,spaceflight as routine space errands etc)
I have to say that not using Wil Wheaton probably
had more to do with this "End Game" power he now has. How do you work in a character who can
stop time, I mean unless he is evil any problem
underlying the movie or an episode would be
reversable. The character of Wesley Crusher has
the equivalent of to many hit points to be in
any story.

Re:OOOOOO, Got a great Theory

[the_2nd_coming]

yeah but if he has been following the traveler for the last 9 years then he should be well trained in his ability to control his powers. he knows when and when not to use them....which acording to the traveler is noeve use them let them fight it out. but it would be interesting to se what would happen if his mom was under threat....would be break and use the power he has?

Re:of course

[Anonymous Coward]

This site is losing all credibility quickly.

Stories about people in Afganistan who dig up commodores and then download / watch divx movies have killed off every last shred of believability this haven for anti-ms zealots ever had.

It is time to get rid of katz

Will they be a few centuries older?

[Guppy06]

As I recall from Insurrection, the Enterprise had to eject its warp core. Without that, the Neutral Zone is a loooooong way off...

Re:Will they be a few centuries older?

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes... I'm sure the warp core is irreplaceable. Afterall, when something breaks on a US Naval vessel, they have to have the crew paddle the ship back to dock, right?

I'm sure Starfleet sent an FTL Tug or just a new warp core... the Enterprise couldn't have been the first Sovereign class ship... that would have to be the USS Sovereign. Now, they're obviously no as important as the Enterprise, so they could have just send her to meet the Enterprise, swapped their warp core into place, and then they could wait for pickup. :)

Re:Will they be a few centuries older?

[Guppy06]

"Afterall, when something breaks on a US Naval vessel, they have to have the crew paddle the ship back to dock, right?"

If you want to make analogies between Starfleet and the USN, let's talk about how long refueling takes on a nuclear engine. Replacing a warp core sounds like something that takes a few months in drydock.

Sorry but SFX for LOTR by WETA no Digital Domain.

[si_brain]

I just needed to specifie this.

The heck with ST X, we want GQ II!!!!

[hughk]

After watching Galaxy Quest, I realised how much ST films sucked. I am sorry, but the acting/direction isn't really there. GQ was just a satire on the whole ST idea.

Sorry I am spoiled, I want to have better action and more fun with this sort of movie and ST lacked in both departments. We all have got a little blase about SFX, they are good for spectacle but don't exactly help the movie develop. Some of the ST story lines were just plane lame, some showed promise, but were not well developed.

There is no such thing as gratuitous nudity

[Anonymous Coward]

It's ALL essential to the plot

Re:There is no such thing as gratuitous nudity

[Anonymous Coward]

This isn't a Star Trek porno flick...

David Gerrold said it best...

[yndrd]

He wrote, "Star Trek is the McDonalds of science fiction." Sometimes filling, sometimes good in a pinch, sometimes what you're looking for, but never quite good.My guess is that this new Star Trek will suck, not because of the director or the tired old franchise, but because even the best Star Trek tends to be marginal.I think it is interesting that we now live in a world where the original themes of Star Trek are considered so obvious that they are cliches: we should all get along, maybe we shouldn't screw around with other cultures, 'stun' is better than 'kill,' etc. Back during the original run, these were revolutionary concepts. Now, they're commonplace. Star Trek lost any sort of social relevance decades ago and now solely exists to validate pathetic fan fantasies. It's about hardware and in-jokes.Q says in the final episode of the Next Generation: "That's the exploration that awaits you. . .not mapping stars and studying nebulae. . .but charting the unknowable possibilities of existence." Good mission statement for a real science fiction series. Too bad Star Trek rarely lives up to it. Too busy selling toys, I guess.Star Trek to me is like giving a child a toy and watching as he plays with the box.

Re:David Gerrold said it best...

[Anonymous Coward]

My guess is that this new Star Trek will suck, not because of the director or the tired old franchise, but because even the best Star Trek tends to be marginal.

Guess what? 99% of the posters on this discussion probably 1) share your opinion, and 2) will line up around the block to see it anyway.

Star Trek to me is like giving a child a toy and watching as he plays with the box.

Yep.

Woo hoo!

[Pope]

Cool, another Akiva hater! Preach on, brother!

A new marketing strategy

[yndrd]

I wonder how bad the Trek franchise would have to get before the fans mounted a grassroots write-in campaign to STOP it.

They wrote all those letters to save it years ago--I wonder when they'll figure out that stopping it now is saving it.

Do they still make these?

[WillSeattle]

I guess I missed some of the latest ST films, which doesn't say much about them being good, since I'm a cinefile on a grand scale.

My first reaction to the script review and other details is: How Last Century.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that this probably won't be as good as some of the current Enterprise episodes are, which is a shame, cause I quite like the Enterprise series.

-

Re:10th Movie

[Anonymous Coward]

Stupid moderators - how can this be offtopic?

Redundant yes, offtopic no.

Is it only me or is the "Offtopic" moderation flag much too complex for the average moderating karma whore to grasp?

Bring back Nick Meyer!

[Pope]

Nicholas Meyer is the best Star Trek movie director. It's quite clear watching #6 the influence he had on the screenplay, with all the literary references.
I don't understand why they don't just get him in there for the even numbered movies :)

And PLEASE let the script be good. IMO, Insurrection was the worst piece of crap since Generations and #5. Ugh.

Here's the added scene

[Anonymous Coward]

Berman: Wes, we're so glad you're back, babe. Now when Pat gives you the cue, babe, you come running out.

(Scene begins... Picard is leading a prison break in a Romulan prison)

Stewart: Wesley Crusher... My God, is that you?

(Wheaton comes running out. Suddenly, a Romulan guard appears and whips out a phaser pistol.)

Berman: Cut! Print it! Wes, you were beautiful, babe, just beautiful. Glad you could come out today.

Wheaton: (bewildered) Um... thanks. Is that it?

Berman: Oh no... now we do a CG edit of the phaser splitting your head open like a ripe melon. It'll be the biggest explosion since the Death Star, babe, and you're all over it! Luv ya babe, now keep in touch... we'll do lunch sometime!

I'm mad as hell!

[msm1th]

Boycott the MPAA fascists! Fight for your rights! Don't give these freedom-hating bastards any more of your money! Don't give in to --- OOH! CANDY!

Rescue in the ST universe

[No Such Agency]

As I recall from Insurrection, the Enterprise had to eject its warp core. Without that, the Neutral Zone is a loooooong way off...

Maybe so but they probably still had FTL comms. Starfleet would send a tow truck by soon enough, I'm sure. While they waited they could kick back and enjoy not saving the unuverse for a while.

Why not consider the director

[Anonymous Coward]

Everyone is talking about even and odd. Look at the director. He directs crappy action flicks. Chances are, this movie will suck. I never actually saw Tomb Raider, but quite a few commented on the absolutely horrific directing.

-ac

Re:Why not consider the director

[Anonymous Coward]

Exactly. When I was reading the prologue to this story and saw

"...Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider. Looks to be pretty action packed."

my first thought was that CT had typed "action packed" as an inadvertent misspelling of "shitter-rific."

Has anyone watched the documentary "Trekkies" ?

[feed_me_cereal]

It's a documentary about star trtek fans. Anyone who has seen it will remember and recognize a particular trekkie who was creating his own star trek movie called "Nemisis". This was quite a while ago, and the movie, I believe, was supposed to be about a star station, but what impressed me was the detail he and his crew put into designing their movie. Now, I would have written this incident off as coincidence if not for the information I just recently aquired, which is that this particular trekkie was seen on an episode of drew carrey. Now, this isn't exactly a "big holywood break", but I can't help but wonder if they're using any of his ideas in this new movie. Does anyone have any information about this?

Re:Has anyone watched the documentary "Trekkies" ?

[kermit1221]

Eek, I was just thinking the same thing. I had to go ask my wife if Nemesis was indeed the name of that guy's project movie though.

weird...

I think this movie will be "stable"

[A_Non_Moose]

After all we have OS X and this upcoming movie has been abbreviated ST X...coincidence?
I think not! (as opposed to I think, not!...punctuation does make a difference).

Reguards,

Moose

You see... they HAVE to do a ST:TNG movie now...

[Jace of Fuse!]

They've got to show off all those Bullet-Time special effects in s Star-Trek setting. Can't let the Matrix have all the fun.

Okay, my bad...

[sterno]

Sorry, just got in the habit of putting V in front of all of it :).

What do you mean bad?

[Snaller]

Insurrection was one of the few of the movies which actually stayed fairly true to the spirit of real(tm) trek.

Digital Domain? Tomb raider? guess what...

[Cosmic Cow]

These guys (digital domain) rock. Too bad This movie will be directed by the guy behind tomb raider...

Basically it's going to be a big FX-packed movie with crappy story (I just hope it won't be as bad as battlefield earth, that's the 0 in a scale from 0-10 in this category), of course we can always WISH the guy learned but seeing the hollywood trend since a few years, I seriously doubt it.

Re:Digital Domain? Tomb raider? guess what...

[jasonzzz]

Yeah, but I would still give it a conciliatory thumbs up if they bring in Angelina and stuff her shirt like they did in TR. I wouldn't mind if I have to gargle and spit thrice and forget that I actually saw yet another Star Trek movie - be there, done that. If I am going to pay $8 for an FX action movie and the plot is thin, they might as well throw in the T&A, eh?

Oh yeah, digital domain does rock, you should see their booth at SigGraph - wow!

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[mshomphe]

Star Trek VIX - " The Vapo Rub"

even number rule

[fliptout]

It seems to me that the even number rule was more relevant, oh, say around 11 years ago.

ST: IV has not aged well in the eyes of many.. I think the movie is a humourous anachronism now; the political and social climates have changed considerably since the mid Eighties.

Star Trek Topic

[IdocsMiko]

Why does /. give Star Wars its own topic but not STar Trek? Slashdotters probably waste^B^B^B^B^B spend far more person-hours watching Star Trek than watching Star Wars. Don't get me wrong... I love them both. It just seems to me that there is more discussion here about Star Trek than about many topics that get their own, um, topic.

Re:Star Trek Topic

[Anonymous Coward]

What the hell is ^B?

Backspace is ^H!

We are kicking you out of the borg!

Saying "Good Star Trek Movie..."

[NickFusion]

Is like saying, that was a tasty "Big Mac."

It's all assembly-line crap, crafted to closely resemble actual [food/movies], and thus fool the consumer into ingesting more.

You have been assimilated, muchacos. Happy?

(Having said that, II was definitely best...};^)

One of Ebert's rules?

[RAVasquez]

I believe it was Roger Ebert who proposed the even/odd Trek rule. I don't have a copy of Ebert's Little Movie Glossary on hand, but here's how he rated the last six:

The Voyage Home: *** 1/2
Final Frontier: **
Undiscovered Country: (not online; don't remember if he did this one)
Generations: **
First Contact: *** 1/2
Insurrection: **

Re:One of Ebert's rules?

[SharpNose]

I like Roger Ebert a lot, but he often missed the boat completely on SF films, which I don't understand because he's quite a sharp guy. In his reviews, he fundamentally misunderstood ST: GENERATIONS and TERMINATOR 2.

I have to agree wholeheartedly, though, with the even/odd theory. Separate audiences shown 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 and 2, 4, 6, and 8 would come away with vastly different impressions. To date, 2 and 8 have been far and away the best movies, with 4 not far behind simply on entertainment value alone.

1 suffered terribly from the distraction of the Decker and Ilia characters - Decker looked dislikable from any angle and as for Ilia - well, acting experience is preferable in an actress...

3 had a fundamentally solid story hampered by some slapdash editing and some execrably bad performances, specifically from the actress who replaced Kirstie Alley as Saavik (Robin somebody?). She should not shoulder the blame completely, as she was given some really horrible lines (such as the explication regarding "protomatter" worthy of a Scooby-Doo episode).

Good ideas are present in 5, and the segment of the story from the point where the Enterprise flies to that planet to rescue purported hostages to the point where Scotty blows Kirk, McCoy, and Spock out of the brig is really good - smart, funny, and exciting. The rest - oh, well.

6 is more of a plain cloak-and-dagger story using the ST characters and setting to do the telling, and as such, I consider the film a success.

7: Uck. I did not like how anything in this film was handled although I was awed by the saucer section re-entry and crash-landing

In 8 (First Contact), the chilling idea of the Borg is given the kind of treatment that only feature-film money can buy. One difficulty in using the NG cast is in finding enough for everyone to do and they succeed here by giving the characters different but interconnected spheres of action. The same thing was done in 4 (Voyage Home) but in a more blunt fashion and less seamlessly. One thing that impressed me was that for the first time, I could sort of follow the movement of the space battles easier - I think whoever directed those sequences (was it actually Frakes?) used the wide-screen format and the elongated shapes of the ships to better convey motion, direction, and scale.

One of my favorite bits in 8 is Troi's "intelligence debriefing" to Riker, complicated by the fact that Zefrem Cochrane has gotten her totally shitfaced. I think her line is "He made me drink three glasses of something called...tequila...before he would even tell me his name!"

Re:One of Ebert's rules?

[Anonymous Coward]

> and some execrably bad performances, specifically
> from the actress who replaced Kirstie Alley as
> Saavik (Robin somebody?)

Kirsty was at the height of her beauty in that movie, complete with gorgeous, waist-length hair (so what if a prop?) I remember thinking she was just about the prettiest woman I had ever seen in my life at the time (still pretty amazine.)

Then they replaced her with a woman who was...not quite as good looking, to put it kindly. Anorexic with a harsh face, to be more precise.

Why replace? Why not just blow away the character and put in another? You saw Kira, not Lt. Rho running around DS9. Why? We will never know.

You got it right, that's how Hollywood works

[tekrat]

You wrote:
------------
Directed by Frakes.
Story and executive production by Nimoy.
Keep Shatner the heck away from the set.
Keep it fast and not too much dialog.
etc..
-------------
This is exactly how Hollywood works. Early in the series of movies, Paramount called in Harlan Ellison and said to him "listen, we make $10 million of a Star Trek movie, and we make $10 Million on a Eddie Murphy movie. So write us a Star Trek Movie with Eddie Murphy in it and we'll make $20 miilion!"

No joke.

Re:You got it right, that's how Hollywood works

[Bobo the Space Chimp]

I was wondering how the hell Hollywood thought Superman III was a good idea.

I always thought it was just a leftover of the "special guest star" crap of '70's TV shows.

Re:Insurrection was BAD!

[Yet Another Smith]

I guess I should say there are spoilers here for anyone who hasn't seen Insurrection and actually wants to, but I won't recomend it.

It made sense. It was entertaining.

It made sense and was entertaining only in the way that Armageddon made sense and was entertaining. It made sense because it did not require anyone to think. The good guys were beautiful suburban white people. The bad guys were ugly, puss ridden freaks, so it was easy to keep track of who was who. Then, there was twenty minutes of running away from baddies through caves. Who didn't see that they were going to have to go back for that kiddie's pocket baby-seal and get trapped by a cave-in at least five minutes before it happened? For me, it was entertaining in the same way as Armageddon, which is to say it was not.

And then there's the lame transporter save. If they could save Picard from the thing before it blew up, why not the baddie, too? If they neglect to save him when all they have to do is beam up two people instead of just one, isn't that just murder? If not, its at least sloppy writing.

As for First Contact, I thought there were some great moments of real internal conflict where data is being tempted. And they made Troi tolerable. All you had to do was get her drunk. Who knew?

I do agree that the (only) cool thing in Insurrection was Data going nuts at the begining. That was fun, and unexpected.

Paging CleverNickName...

[wowbagger]

I do hope Wil will keep us posted. Will you, Wil?

Re:Paging CleverNickName...

[not_really_here]

funny, that's what I was just thinking... or maybe he can't talk about the movie for some reason?? Confidentiality agreements? Probably he'd be required to say that it was good, anyway.

Will Sela Return?

[meldroc]

How much do you want to bet that Paramount has negotiated or is negotiating a contract with Denise Crosby to play Sela? She's one of the more interesting Romulans on TNG.

Note to staff: READ ARTICLE BEFORE POSTING

[Anonymous Coward]

Does anyone actually read the article? It's dated 9.24.01! Hello? Two months ago! Wil Wheaton has already posted on his website that he's done costume fitting. Does anyone on the slashdot staff check facts?

Re:At least the titles of Star Trek films aren't b

[spaceyhackerlady]

Titles?

Some of my favourite titles are from a weird and warped Aussie tv show a few years back. The original web site appears dead, but there is an archive here - click on the Home Page link. Some of my faves:

The Sound of One Hand Killing

Don't Cry For Me Arch 'n' Tina

You Light Up My Wife

"K for Kleen!"

...laura

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[DahGhostfacedFiddlah]

I can't help but be impressed that they've been able to consistently follow this pattern for 9 movies. I'm sure after first contact, people said "They must have learned their lesson now - Insurrection will be great" It's not often that you can consistently rate a movie before it comes out.

Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb

[jeeryg_flashaccess]

If I had points I would mod you up. Thanks's for the laugh!

Stuart Baird directing correction

[gconway]

Baird didn't direct "Tomb Raider," he was an editor on that film (uncredited). Simon West directed "Raider," for what it's worth.

You've got your info a little mixed up

[19Buck]

What became ST:TMP was originally intended to be the pilot for a new Star Trek Series: Star Trek: Phase II. At that time, Paramount was working out all the details of starting up a Paramount television Station, and ST:Phase II was supposed to be the premiere launch vehicle for the new network. Plans for the Paramount network were scrapped only a few weeks before ST:PhaseII was set to begin filming. They had it all going on, sets were built, costumes made, scripts were being written, i believe most, if not all, of the original cast were signed up for the new series too. When the plans for a new TV station were scrapped, PhaseII was also scrapped. When paramount later called for a Star Trek motion picture, it was indeed in answer to Star Wars, but it wasn't because they feared Star Wars would become more popular, Rather, they were capitalizing on Star Wars' success. it was sorta like "hey look how good Star Wars is doing. Don't we have a SciFi series with a rather large fan base we can use to tank on that success?" they reworked the original PhaseII script into what became ST:TMP. I dont know much more off the top of my head, but there is a book out with ~alot~ of information about what Phase II was going to be. From what I know, they had some seriously good ideas, but because the network was scrapped, so was Phase II as a result, and what could have possibly been the best Star Trek Show ever never came to be. It wasn't all the surprising that when Paramount revived plans to start a TV network in the 90's that they went shopping for a Star Trek show to headline the new network, and hence, we ended up with Voyager.. but that's another discussion totally.

Re:Midgets fucking rock!

[Anonymous Coward]

Because Star Trek is the most PC show on TV. Thats why in Voyager they made the captain a chick, and the only other white crewman a pussy jew. And whats up with the black vulcan?

Makes sense though...

[sterno]

They take a risk with the odd ones because they know everybody will show up anyhow in the hopes that maybe THIS time they'll finally break the pattern. It of course flops, and then they have to work hard to make a good one to make sure that people don't just give up all together.

Re:Makes sense though...

[jandrese]

Actually, it seems like they do exactly the opposite. The odd movies tend to be more of the same (tm) while the even ones more often break the mold (ST IV for example).

Look at your own numbers!

[ShieldWolf]

1=2.5
2=3
3=3
4=3.5
5=2
6=3
7=3

So the average for ODD movies is 2.6 and EVEN movies it is 3.2

The WORST movie was an ODD (2) one and the best was an EVEN (3.5).

To top it all off there is NEVER the case that a ODD movie is followed by and EVEN movie with a LOWER score, nor an EVEN movie followed by an ODD movie with a higher score, so the curse exists. ;)

-Shieldwolf

Data's aging

[ansible]

Actually, they talked about that when they found his "mother". He's supposed to appear to age as well, even though his body will last for millenia.

Another plot idea

[rlaskey]

Okay I got an idea for another star trek movie. A Soverign class ship is being built in the ship yards, and for some strange reason a temporal rift opens and the ship unmanned goes into the rift. It just happens to collide with the Enterprise NX-01, and severly damages it. Cpt archers crew is then forced to board and takeover the modern Soverign class battleship and discovers the borg we're really trying to get a hold of it. But cpt archer gets it first. Somewhere along the way they meet up with Seven of nine, and her and cpt archer get it on. full nudity of course with closeups of the "real" action. while this is going on, Tepal get's hot and bothered and joins in on the fun. After archers bones these two, he gets captured by the borg queen, and lays he d**k on her too and ends up handing the borg a major defeat. THE QUEEN GETS LAID!

Unintentionally funny....

[kaladorn]

it just means now the universe will be filled with billions of rouge borg.

I assume you mean rogue, though a bunch of rouge borg raging around does have a certain scary aesthetic quality.

This leads to the obvious question:
Would this make them Red Shirts?

And although moderators moderating the parent poster as overrated may in fact be jealous of the intelligence of the comments, they certainly aren't jealous of the spelling. (Last time I checked, statement had a letter between the second t and the m....).

Date

[Wonko42]

Anyone notice the date on that article? September 24, 2001. This isn't news, yada yada yada, you know the drill.

Resurrect 'Star Trek: Phase Two'!!!!!!!!!

[Blaede]

That's the series we all want to see.

Too many actors. No movie stars. Will suck.

[Fantastic Lad]

The best Trek films worked because they had Kirk, Bones and Spock. Kirk is truly larger than life.

The only good part in Generations, (an otherwise BAD, BAD, BAD film), was when Kirk made Picard look like a square school boy. (And I think Picard is a wonderful character!) But I hate, 'Good Parts' films. If it isn't all good, then it's a bad film. Period.

Truth is this: Giant casts of so-so actors all with contracts which guarantee X minutes of screen time regardless of the needs of the story, = Another SHITTY film.

The last good trek film was the "Undiscovered Country." Story first.

Everything since was boring shlock. The Odd/Even numbered movie thing is completely innacurate from my perspective. I loved the first film. I liked the fifth film. I despised the eighth film. I don't understand people.

Finally: Watching Data say "Shit" was everything Trek was not supposed to be. Thanks Berman. You can't write. Please turn in your pen and go home before somebody wizens up and kicks your conceited ass.

The best thing about the next film is that Wil Wheaton will get some work and personal satisfaction.

-Fantastic Lad

Even Numbered Trek Movies Do NOT Suck.

[Anonymous Coward]

Need I say more? :)

Star Trek 12:So Very Tired

[rweir]

I'm just holding out for Star Trek 12 to be released..it's bound to be a classic!

Only reason to watch Star Trek

[Anonymous Coward]

Would be that hottie currently playing the Klingon on "Enterprise." Yeow!

The franchise long ago lost any value beyond the packing of artificial boobs into paint-on starfleet uniforms.

The "end" of Star Trek.

[Maul]

A long while ago a friend and I were discussing how the Star Trek franchise was going down the tubes, and that Star Trek 10 ought to be some sort of movie that will "end" Star Trek entirely. In other words, it wouldd somehow close the open holes in TNG, and DS9 story lines all at once. I know that this won't happen, and I'm sure that the hardcore Trekkies would probably dislike it.

I think one of the rather off the wall ideas we thought of was a scenario in which Sisko returns, but returns "evil" somehow. He forges an alliance with the Romulans, and in the end the crew of the Enterprise must sacrifice their ship and themselves to save the galaxy. This could be an interesting way to end the whole franchise, would intermingle the TNG and DS9 cast (as well as providing a GOOD excuse for Worf to rejoin the Enterprise Crew).

It might seem rediculous, but I find that solution more appealing than the direction the franchise appears to be heading: more series that suck even worse than Voyager / Soft core porn.