Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars II Trailer Online

Jager writes: "You can download the new starwars trailer here. Enjoy." Seemed to me as if Lucas was worried about the "love story" emphasis in the previous teasers, and wanted to make sure people knew there would be plenty of zapping and slashing.

503 comments

  1. Link not active?!! by justanyone · · Score: 1

    I didn't get that link, anyone have a better one?

    1. Re:Link not active?!! by normiep · · Score: 2, Informative

      They apparently don't want people linked directly too it so they banned anything with certain referer fields (like slashdot).

      Follow the URL, copy it from the location bar, go to some other site, then paste it back in. That should take care of it.

      --

      -- Point? None! Cob.

    2. Re:Link not active?!! by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      or you could just click the link, get the error, and press enter in the url bar.

    3. Re:Link not active?!! by normiep · · Score: 1

      That works in netscape, it didn't work in IE, so I figured I'd cover all bases.

      --

      -- Point? None! Cob.

    4. Re:Link not active?!! by DoktorFaust · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right. It's nothing personal against slashdot, Apple just blocked any site pointing directly to the trailer. They've done this before -- and hey, they want to advertise, right? Nobody seems to have posted this yet, but you can just go to Apple's trailers site and click on the obvious graphic.

      --

      Die Menschen verhoehnen was sie nicht verstehen. -- Goethe.
    5. Re:Link not active?!! by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      Okay, I've got to apple's quicktime download site--which one do I choose? Windows version or Macintosh version?

      Anyone know how to play these things?

  2. errrm - the link doesn't work by terrymr · · Score: 1

    it apparently checks the referrer header and denies access if you're not coming from the lucasfilm site.

    1. Re:errrm - the link doesn't work by The+Monster · · Score: 2
      apparently checks the referrer header

      So you point to the link, right-click, copy shortcut (or whatever your browser requires), click in the Address field and paste the address in so that the akamai webserver doesn't know it's being Slashdotted. At the risk of sounding like Nick Burns, Your Company's Computer Guy :
      Now was that so hard?
      --

      [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
      SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    2. Re:errrm - the link doesn't work by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      Come on, where are the paranoid geeks we all know and love.

      Everyone knows that junkbuster can be used to fake the referral header...

      The link works fine for me, since my referral string reads 'mom' not 'slashdot'

      I know there's a 'menace' or 'clone' joke for the above line, but I can't seem to find it...

  3. George Lucas/Steve Jobs Axis of Evil by HeywoodJablomi69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know how it works at any other download sites, but if you go to www.starwars.com it won't let you download the hi-res version without Quicktime Pro. What gives? I want my free, bandwidth-consuming movie trailers, and I don't want to pay for them!

    1. Re:George Lucas/Steve Jobs Axis of Evil by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need QuickTime Pro. However, QuickTime will bug you constantly about upgrading, which basically amounts to paying Apple $30 for a serial number to make it quit bugging you and un-cripple the QuickTime Player. I suggest finding a pirated serial number, try the extra features, see if it's worth your $30, then register - that's what I did.

      Of course, this being Slashdot, you probably think it should be free (beer and speech, but mostly beer). Bleh.

      On the other hand, I'm really not happy with the nagging. Oh well. *shrug*

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:George Lucas/Steve Jobs Axis of Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paying Apple $30 for a serial number

      "Drink your Malt-o-meal."

      It's a crummy ad. Thanks for blowing it for me, Apple. You suck.

    3. Re:George Lucas/Steve Jobs Axis of Evil by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      It's, "Don't forget to drink your Ovaltine."

  4. Divx5 version by Tranvisor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hey, this was from the other thread, and the new trailor is up there. Nice Compression.

    http://node2.callihq.net/

    1. Re:Divx5 version by strredwolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MOD THIS UP!

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    2. Re:Divx5 version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any mirrors? This seems slow.

    3. Re:Divx5 version by --daz-- · · Score: 1

      Notice that the server is a Win2K AS box running on an OC-48.

      I'm sure it's getting hopelessly slashdotted, yet, I have two downloads running (the DivX and the WMA version) and both are running at 40+KB/s.

      Who says Windows can't run with the big boys?

      Good job, Drestin (haven't seen you on COMNA in awhile...)

      -daz

      P.S.- Thanks for converting from that awful SlowTime crap!

    4. Re:Divx5 version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting 5kbps on a 56k... that's fast buddy

    5. Re:Divx5 version by Drestin · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's sitting at 95 mb/s SOLID. There is a single 100 Mb/s full duplex ethernet connection to that box and that's the bottleneck. We got bandwidth to spare actually :) The box is actually just regular W2K Server, just a little Celeron 300A running at 450 with 256 megs of PC100 in it. Only thing "fancy" about it is the Cheeta it spins from.

    6. Re:Divx5 version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just serving static webpages/files. Once you start getting more fancy and start generating webpages on the fly (from a database, usually), the power of a server starts to matter much more. This is where the "big boys" are used.

    7. Re:Divx5 version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5k is fast? lol

    8. Re:Divx5 version by Seehund · · Score: 1

      There are mirrors linked from that page. As per the webmasters request I mirrored the files as well:
      DivX 5, MPEG

      Where's your mirror? ;)

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    9. Re:Divx5 version by Seehund · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry, try these instead:
      DivX 5
      MPEG

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    10. Re:Divx5 version by Seehund · · Score: 1

      (Perhaps needless to say, they're there temporarily and will be pulled if the load gets unbearable and/or the MPAA bugs me)

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    11. Re:Divx5 version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is for 56k, dumbshit

  5. "Large" Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone supply a direct link to the "Large" .mov?

    1. Re:"Large" Version by Axe · · Score: 1

      http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/gate /ep2_clone_war_p640.mov

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  6. Nice Divx5 Up by Cheshire+Cat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Someone from the earlier thread posted a nice Divx 5 version of the trailer at 640 x 480 resolution. Check it out here.

    --

    Last night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas I'll never know.
    1. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat OT, but where might one find the codec to play such a file with aviplay? I possess the unofficial divx-codecs Debian package, but apparently it doesn't handle Divx 5.

    2. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by ananke · · Score: 1

      hmm, anybody know how i can get those codecs for linux? the package they have on their website is an exec...

      --
      --- d'oh
    3. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Ig0r · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Avifile page has a DivX 5 decoder tarball in the downloads section.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    4. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it ironic...

      http://www.callihq.net/ is a Win2k host. Thousands of slashdotters are downloading from a bad-boy 2k machine when Apple gets overloaded.

      oh man this is good.

    5. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Go to http://avifile.sourceforge.net/. The player works great and they have a package with all of the windows codecs.

    6. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by dgp · · Score: 1

      Is it just my machine or is the audio wayyy out of sync with the video?

    7. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by dimator · · Score: 2

      Any hints for viewing these under linux? I tried mplayer but it seems it supports up to divx4, not 5 (right?)

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    8. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the MPEG version. It's much bigger, but mplayer shouldn't have any trouble with it.

    9. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to be fair, Slashdot probably only represents a subset of Apple's traffic. www.callihq.net is probably being hit by a smaller subset of Slashdot readers that are reading these comments and going there.
      Overall, Apple probably has heavier traffic by a few orders of magnitude.

    10. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Alan · · Score: 2

      Grab 'avifile'. Nice little app that uses windows libraries to do the decoding. Works perfectly on every avi I've found. Check it out here.

    11. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Alan · · Score: 2

      Erhmm... minor correction... every file but this one. Fsck.

    12. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by ranger8x · · Score: 1

      yeah, the divx audio got out of sync for me too

    13. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Apple's bandwidth, it's Akamai's. Now go fuck yourself.

    14. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by ananke · · Score: 1

      i use mplayer, and i already have all the codecs from avifile. still no video :)

      --
      --- d'oh
    15. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is to look at it on Linux I should use Windows? There's no linux application for this open source project?

    16. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by daserver · · Score: 1

      Divx5 works in latest ffmpeg and the latest cvs of mplayer also supports divx5 through the divx5 codec found on the avifile site.

    17. Re:Nice Divx5 Up by ranger8x · · Score: 1

      now that i've played around with it, it only skips when using Windows media player. the DIVX player runs it perfectly. :)

  7. /.'ed by Toodles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Admiral: Slashdot? You're belief in that ancient religion hasn't help you conjure up that Episode 2 trailer.

    Vader: I find your lack of faith disturbing, Admiral.

    *Admiral chokes under weight of a full frontal Slashdotting.*

    I have to admit, Im impressed. We took down Apple.

    --
    Toodles D. Clown
    1. Re:/.'ed by Andorion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      UHHHHhhhhhhhhhh....

      OR you could just go to http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/ and watch it work?

      -Ando

    2. Re:/.'ed by Aash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yes, Apple has been Slashdotted. That's gotta be it. Because, god knows, no one knew about this obscure little trailer before Slashdot brought it to the attention of the masses.

      --

      --
      These aren't the droids you're looking for.
    3. Re:/.'ed by codetalker · · Score: 1

      Darth Slashdot to Apple ben Kenobi: Your powers are weak old man...

      --
      All a coder really wants, are fast cars, fast women and fast algorithms.
    4. Re:/.'ed by amaiman · · Score: 1

      It's not /.'ed. They just blocked the referrer. Cut and paste the address manually into your browser and it will work.

    5. Re:/.'ed by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Your sig (All a coder really wants, are fast cars, fast women and fast algorithms reminds me of an old Tom T. Hall song Faster Horses, Younger Women, Older Whiskey, and More Money. I recomend searching for it on your favorite P2P^H^H^Hintelectual property stealing program. It is a great story song about a young man who asks an old cowboy about what makes him tick.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    6. Re:/.'ed by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      The line goes as such: "nice boots, wanna fuck?"

      No wonder it doesn't work for you, you've gotten it completely wrong.

    7. Re:/.'ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you did not take it down, you will never take it down, no matter how hard you try. Apple is coming off akamai servers, which are right down the block from you no matter where you are, isp or at your school. And don't hold your precious slashdot so high, it is what akamai and apple want it to be. The only reason there is a slashdot is because there is va linux, and the only reason there is va still around is akamai, they just blocked your silly link so you will have to go to the apple site, you lazy ass. get a clue

    8. Re:/.'ed by haedesch · · Score: 1

      "we took down apple"

      baaaahahahahahaahaha.
      your post = (-5: stupid)

    9. Re:/.'ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing you take down is the average IQ of the slashdot readership. "Referral Denied" means they do not allow outside referrals. I suppose loading the page without a referral is too difficult for a moron like you to figure out. You brain-dead goat rapist. How many times were you dropped on your head when you were a baby? Somebody please mod down the parent post.

  8. Those Crafty Apples by hackus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like they are blocking the referral downloads from Slashdot.org.

    Gee. I wonder why that is?

    :-)

    -hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  9. Exclusive movies if you have Ep 1 DVD by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    Nevermind the high res version, you can see that as a trailer in the movies. If you have the DVD, you can access a special movie for Clone Wars.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  10. No referer by rf600r · · Score: 0

    Akamai won't allow the link. Akamai sucks.

    1. Re:No referer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you suck a goat.

  11. To Those Who Complain. by suwalski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the previous post about the trailer airing on Fox, many people said that they do not like the direction that Star Wars is taking. Although I agree with most of what these people say, some went as far as saying not to spend 10 dollars at the theatre to see it, but rather wait until rental time.

    To those people who do not think this movie will be worth seeing, reconsider -- the visual effects in Phantom Menace did not disappoint, and from the looks of it, this movie will be just as nice with the CGI. As a fan of CGI, I was very happy with the pod race scene on a 40 foot screen, and I think I'll get my money's worth seeing the new movie when it comes out at theatres.

    If you've read this far, you probably agree with me.

    1. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Woko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CGI is neat, and its a great tool for a director to be able to expand his vision beyond what is physically possible. But it doesn't make a story.

      Everyone marvelled at the CGI in Toy Story, but it was the characters, the laughs and the plot that made it a success. Compare to FF.

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
    2. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are willing to pay $10 just to watch new CGI on a big screen, is it really necessary to pretend that you are watching a movie?

    3. Re:To Those Who Complain. by l810c · · Score: 1

      Look what they did with a good story, tiny models and blue screen with the original. Yea the pod race was cool, but CGI also wrought JJB. This trailer did not inspire me at all which doesn't bode well after the last disaster of a movie.

    4. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Grab · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, it'll have some nice pictures. But that doesn't make it a good film. There's a quote from a guy who worked on Shrek along the lines of "People think that the holy grail of animation is to be able to animate a human. In fact, it's to tell a story." TPM didn't tell a story, it just filled in some lame links between CGI sequences, and the content of those CGI scenes was usually trite and uninteresting.

      The pod race that you all drool over is nothing more than "Days of Thunder" with different pictures (and hey, did that film ever suck!) - nice speed effects, but nothing interesting happening to make you worry about the character. The ground battle scene sucked by taking place on a manicured lawn and the simple question "if they have bombs, why don't they get other better weapons?". The storming-the-palace scenes sucked by the "oh hey, they all suddenly get guns with ropes on, yeah right" bit. And the space bit was just "Home Alone" - kid lucks out with slapstick to save the day. Never mind the totally irrelevant fish-chasing-the-submarine sequence.

      The only new and interesting thing in the whole film was the Jedi fight scenes - they finally worked out how a Jedi (who can use the Force to jump and stuff) would be able to fight.

      Grab.

    5. Re:To Those Who Complain. by colmore · · Score: 2

      I think limited special effects forces better storytelling. When you can't show everything, you have to explain some things, which creates dialogue and more creative storytelling.

      The original movies might have sucked with CGI.

      I'm not too impressed with CGI in general. It works great for cartoons and dark Jurrasic Park scenes, but for bright shots, everything CGI looks plastic. Somehow it bothers me a lot more than models on blue screen ever did.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    6. Re:To Those Who Complain. by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The pod race that you all drool over is nothing more than "Days of Thunder" with different pictures...

      Actually, it's the chariot race from Ben Hur. Seriously. It's almost a shot-for-shot homage, as Lucas and McCallum both said several times in various interviews.

    7. Re:To Those Who Complain. by awdougherty · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, I disagree with you strongly here. CGI is good, and as someone else around here said, it's a great tool for a director to realize his vision. But it's still not perfect (which means it can still detract from a shot). Furthermore, all CGI and no story becomes a cartoon without a plot.

      The Pod race was cool to look at, but I still thought it sucked incredibly hard. The ESPN-esque announcers completely killed any feeling I had that I was in a galaxy far far away and the acting just made my ears bleed.

      On top of that, putting in the cast of Willow (was E.T. in that shot or another shot) also distracted me. CGI alone could not save it. The light saber battle at the end is a perfect example og great CGI. Really awesome things were going on and the CGI just enhanced it that much more.

      I can't see a movie just for the CGI, especially since so many movies are so full of eye candy these days. It's almost the standard to have awesome CGI visuals, the successful films will have to offer more (or have a Star Wars in front of the title).

    8. Re:To Those Who Complain. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure if I'll see it in a theater or not, but this will be the first Star Wars movie I do not see on opening night. Unless I get into the premiere ;).

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:To Those Who Complain. by gowen · · Score: 1
      It's almost a shot-for-shot homage, as Lucas and McCallum both said several times in various interviews.
      <Tony Roberts> An homage? No we stole the idea outright.</Tony Roberts>
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    10. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      The most embarrassing thing is hearing Anakin or whomever say things like "My Lady..." with a dorky midwestern accent. Don't even get me started on Portman, who always sounds like a whining Valley Girl dolt. Lucas could have hired some unknown actors from around the world for virtually nothing who could've acted circles around these brats and really helped to bring the thing to life.

      --
      **>>BELCH
    11. Re:To Those Who Complain. by .sig · · Score: 2

      They did suck with CGI. The "Special" Edition of the classic trilogy was not only worse than the original, but pretty much unwatchable.

      When they were released on video, I watched them with a friend who had never seen any of them, but was able to pick out almost every scene that had been destroyed. It was more of an experiment with new toys than an attempt to improve the story, it's unbelievable how horrible the quality of the new scenes is compared to the rest of the films.

      If filmmakers were more interested in a good solid story than in pretty pictures I think we'd all be a lot happier, but until that day comes the average movie is just going to keep sacrificing plot for eye-candy.

      [END RANT]

      --
      -Space for rent
    12. Re:To Those Who Complain. by AtaruMoroboshi · · Score: 2


      Portman is a great actress, or at least was in Leon / The Professional.

      The trailer looks awful. The dialog is crap. I'll still see it, but I'm waiting till it's been in the theaters a few weeks.

    13. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How the idea that ANY of the star wars movies are great films is beyond me. All the Star Wars movies were made for kids to enjoy. Lots of action, cool explosions, monsters, space ships, princesses and brave rescuers.

      ESB, the 'dark' movies that everyone raves about also has a monster on an airless asteroid (wonder what it eats) and our heros walking inside it with just face masks on - while its mouth is open to the vacuum of space.

      The Star War's movies are just for FUN. They aren't meant to be serious and logical. They are meant to entertain kids.

      If the next movie looks cool, and entertains me and my kids for two hours then it has succeeeded!

    14. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      The most embarrassing thing is hearing Anakin or whomever say things like "My Lady..." with a dorky midwestern accent.

      Heh, well, wasn't he supposed to be a hick anyway? From a little backwater village...

      Sure sounds impressive when he's voiced by James Earl Jones though...

    15. Re:To Those Who Complain. by Grab · · Score: 2

      Good point. But I was trying to think of a film which sucked, not a decent film. ;-) Having said that, "Ben Hur" didn't occur to me, simply bcos it's not my generation - I can remember crap films from 1985 through today as much as you want, but I have a poor memory for the good films from earlier which I've seen on TV. Ho hum.

      Grab.

    16. Re:To Those Who Complain. by davesag · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I only saw fan-tome menace on a pirate video dubbed into russian with chinese subtitles on a 14 inch tv - i'm waiting for the full set dvd box to come out 2020. the other night i watched ben hur on dvd on my new widescreen tv and woah i thought, that chariot race is cool. looks a bit like the pod race from fan-tome menace. nice to know i was right, again.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  12. Rehash of old material? by KartMan · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think some of these scenes look awfully familiar? I know Lucas wants to appeal to our sense of how much the original trilogy rocked but who wants a repeat of old material? I had to do a double take when I saw the trailer on TV, I had visions of Princess Leia in Jabba's palace again. I just hope he hasn't given everything away in the trailers and we'll still get a big surprise when we got to see it. Luke, I am your father...

    --

    Go Kart Parts - Got to love driving with the ground an in
    1. Re:Rehash of old material? by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else think some of these scenes look awfully familiar? I know Lucas wants to appeal to our sense of how much the original trilogy rocked but who wants a repeat of old material? I had to do a double take when I saw the trailer on TV, I had visions of Princess Leia in Jabba's palace again. I just hope he hasn't given everything away in the trailers and we'll still get a big surprise when we got to see it. Luke, I am your father...

      Well... they have to do the Darth / Clown Queen boinking (so they can get Luke & younger sister Leia). They have to have Luke ending up stuck under the wise care of "Uncle Ben" & his other relatives. They have to have Leia sticking with her mom while her dad comes chasing after Leia in his battle-starship. Or at least set all this up for the beginning of "Episode 4.

      Considering this isn't Episode 3, they'll have the birth of Luke and possibly Leia. The rise of the Dark Empire and the collapse of the Democratic Federation. They have to foreshadow the killing of the Jedi Knights, the conversion of young Vader into Dark Vader, and quite possibly the rise of the Resistance.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    2. Re:Rehash of old material? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Actually, if the preface to the novelisations (it had Lucas discussing his ideas for all nine episodes, IIRC) I read years ago is to be believed, The first movie is young anakin, the second is anakin turning to the dark side, the third is him becoming the vader we know and love. So, the third movie should end with the birth of the twins and the creation of vader (Obi Wan knocks him into a volcano or something then the emperor has the cybernetics grafted onto him).

      I imagine the third will have Anakin trying to take his kids (or the pregnant Natalie Portman) back to make them evil jedis, then end with a fight between obi wan and him which results in anakin getting maimed (in the volcano or something similar). The final scene will probably have Natalie Portman cradling her babies, and cut to Anakin getting turned into Vader.

    3. Re:Rehash of old material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine the third will have Anakin trying to take his kids

      Maybe I've misunderstood it all these years, but I always got the impression that Vader was surprised in the climax of RotJ to learn there was a sister. "A sister! Your mother was wise to hide her from me."

    4. Re:Rehash of old material? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Thus my comment "(or the pregnant Natalie Portman)".

    5. Re:Rehash of old material? by stubblehead · · Score: 1

      "get a big surprise when we go to see it"

      I kind of hope there's nothing TOO big - my friend saw 'empire' and while on line, waiting a long ass time, someone ran out of the theatre and yelled 'darth is luke's father! darth is luke's father!'. (someone tackled him and proceeded to beat him, thankfully) think about how quickly the movie's plotlines and surprises will be posted online, to the point that you'll inevitably stumble on a site with the spoiler right there in your face (no /. 'click here for spoiler' option).

      and to those who feel lucas is still cognitive and interested in the saga, just watch the 'behind the scenes' stuff in the ep1 dvd. he gives off the strong impression that he never EVER thought of expanding ch4-6 into 1-3 and 7-9, and had put SW on the shelf for 15+ years. he sounds like he wrote a completely new story from scratch which is why ep1 is decent as a movie, but sucks as a part of star wars, as the whole. i think 1-3 will all be okay on their own, but until he stops putting his freakin' daughter and her favorite pop icons in it, they'll never scratch the surface of what the original trilogy and it's plot is really all about.

      [nerd alert: if you really want some insight on what the pre-New Hope stories are like, check out the sw rpg (pencil & paper). they have quite a few expansion books, some of which discuss what life was like before the empire and it's rise. much, much cooler than ep1, and it's closer in continuity.]

      --

      Rock!
  13. A pointer to the .MOV file by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/640/ clone_war_ctp_lp640.mov -- try that in QT 5 player itself. I can't guarantee that it works though.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:A pointer to the .MOV file by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1
      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  14. karma pimping by NeoCode · · Score: 0, Redundant
    1. Re:karma pimping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, too bad they posted the correct link.

    2. Re:karma pimping by Andorion · · Score: 1

      No, HERE is the correct link:

      http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/

      -Berj

    3. Re:karma pimping by NeoCode · · Score: 1

      oops..sorry :( my bad.. guess it doesn't work if you access it directly..

  15. cartoon by lunartik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All the CGI looks like anime or something.

    It doesn't look real. Something about the models, miniture sets and mock-ups of Hoth and other planets in the first three movies had a texture to them that made them more believeable. Also the camera didn't fly all over the place constantly.

    Looks like another pod race type scene (a big CGI jack off session that has nothing to contribute to a story) and a lot more characters that you won't care about (but hey, if Lucas throws 300 new characters in he can sell figures of them all to people that have to buy every single one.

    This crap almost makes you feel like becoming a Trekkie (shudder). At least they come up with an interesting story and leave the visuals as a compliment to it.

    D

    1. Re:cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is Trekker to you. P.S. Star ships would not BANK in space either. Shudder...

    2. Re:cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...or a Dr. Who fan.

      No CGI monsters on that show, just foam, rubber and a piece of colored glass in front of the camera!

    3. Re:cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they didn't bank wouldn't people go flying off to one side of the ship as they turned? Mind you, maybe I just don't get this whole "artifical gravity" stuff. Why aren't people sqwashed into a pile of goo in the back of their seats when they accelerate?

    4. Re:cartoon by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      the pod race does contribute to the story.....it shows how much of an acomplished piolet young Anakin is. it also displays is strength in the force and his cockiness/agression.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:cartoon by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      (but hey, if Lucas throws 300 new characters in he can sell figures of them all to people that have to buy every single one.

      Ah, yes. Yet another phenomenon skewered by The Onion: "Star Wars Fan Collects All 48,720" (Vol. 35, Iss. 23, pg. 1)

    6. Re:cartoon by halo8 · · Score: 1

      Course thoes 300 new characters can be added to that new starwars Massivly Multiplayer video game

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    7. Re:cartoon by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the video game opportunities! It shows that Star Wars is still a very powerful video game franchise.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    8. Re:cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Intertial dampeners, my man, inertial dampeners...

    9. Re:cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's actually Trekkie, you fucking dumbass Next-Generation troll. There was a world before Picard, you know. Go eat a bag of hell!

    10. Re:cartoon by dpt · · Score: 1


      > This crap almost makes you feel like becoming a Trekkie (shudder). At least they > come up with an interesting story and leave the visuals as a compliment to it.

      You mean as in Voyager? "Oh, no here's another anomaly/special effect that's affecting us/the ship in some dull way" ... "Quick, hit that reset button so that everything will be exactly like it was at the beginning of the episode" ... "Ah, all fixed".

      Repeat ad infinitum, and mix in a few lame rip-offs of Next-Gen (i.e. shamelessly re-using Q and the Borg instead of thinking of something original) and that's about it.

      Or in Star Trek: Insurrection? *shudder*

      They should clearly not make any more "Star Trek" movies or television shows for a minimum of five years, instead of just slowly milking it to death. I know it will hurt you trekkies, but it'll be better in the long run!

  16. My thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reminded me of TPM. Same look, same "blah" dialog.. except worse. The line from Yoda was embarassing. And they're using Bobba Fett to make clones? Sigh. The whole thing looked pretty, lots of action, but I'm afraid it's going to suck pretty bad. The trailer was disorganized and made my head hurt. Lots happened, but I'd have to see it again to make sense of it. I'm not looking forward to this.

    1. Re:My thoughts... by Progoth · · Score: 1

      it's not boba fett. I didn't catch exactly what he said in the trailer, but I was at a store a few days ago and saw episode 2 "preview" figures. I didn't pay too much attention to them, except for the Fett, his name was something like "Jetta" Fett....I don't remember exactly. He wasn't as beat up as Boba, and he was bluish instead of green.

    2. Re:My thoughts... by TigerPlish · · Score: 0

      That would be Jango, Boba's dad.

      And yes, that is Slave I. Looks like Junior inherits Daddy's ride.

      To those that cry 'milking the original tril': get a grip. You make flicks to make cash and get famous. Not for art, not anymore ;o)

      Besides.. Fett? LIghtsabers everywhere? The first vestiges of the Empire? C'mon, man! SOme of us have been waiting 20 years for this! =o)

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  17. Fox trailer conspiracy against Tivo! by reaper20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crap, I got 1/2 the trailer at the end of malcolm, the other 1/2 in the beginning of the Xfiles ... so I can't watch it all at once ... ARGH!

    1. Re:Fox trailer conspiracy against Tivo! by bioart · · Score: 1

      My wife made me stop taping the two shows just in case that same thing happened...

      I feel your pain

      --
      -- Huh?
    2. Re:Fox trailer conspiracy against Tivo! by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

      Yes. I knew that was going to happen so I told it to start recording the X-files 5 minutes early, yes!

      --
      What signature defines me as a person?
  18. Get trailor by WhiteBandit · · Score: 2, Informative

    To go to the trailor site, simple solution:

    Cut and paste the link into your browser :P
    (Don't click on the link as it detects the referer address and it will block you.)

    http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/index.ht ml

    Dave

  19. Very unimpressed by HEbGb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Fine, mod me down because you don't agree. But..

    I was really unimpressed with the trailer; it seemed like they devised one of the most generic plots possible, threw some famous people at it, and bought themselves some expensive, but rather unimaginative, CGI. The result is fodder for the masses and the die-hard fans, with a perfect marketing opportunity for McDonalds tie-ins.

    Lucas and his ilk really had the chance to take the high road here with these new Star Wars movies, and use his energy to create something imaginative, unique, and compelling. Instead he cranked out more fodder, really for nothing more than to continue milking money out of the franchise. Looks like it's continuing.

    Disappointing.

    1. Re:Very unimpressed by schwatoo · · Score: 1

      "Disappointing."

      On the contrary. No Jar-Jar

      --
      I have trouble with passwords among other things.
    2. Re:Very unimpressed by EricKrout.com · · Score: 2

      I can understand if you don't feel that the new movies compare to the originals. You have the right to your own opinion, and if you're just simply not impressed or captivated by the trailers or new films, fine.

      But put yourself in Lucas' shoes for a minute. Here is a guy who, a couple of decades ago, created something legendary and almost mythical for a generation of movie-goers and sci-fi fans.

      He's then charged with the task of one-up'ing his own past greatness with a few new movies. He must create dazzling effects that are better than anything being done with the multi-million dollar movies of current day, and he must make a good story out of it.

      In the meantime, he has to worry about impressing the first generation of fans who saw the original films as well as captivating a whole new generation of youngsters with the Star Wars tale.

      I guess you could kind of compare it to Michael Jordan's return(s) to the NBA after his initial retirement. People understand that he's not the limber acrobat from 20 years ago, yet it's almost as though they're dissappointed when he doesn't jump from half-court and dunk the ball.

      But, the "wise" basketball fan still appreciates him for all that he's given to the game and for the people he's influenced in the process. It should be the same for Lucas.

      monolinux.com :: Beware The Penguins!

    3. Re:Very unimpressed by Xpilot · · Score: 2

      Generic plot? Heck, how do you know that? Have you seen the movie already?

      Personally, I think that lightsaber action rocks. Give the movie a chance. At least, watch it before you judge it. It seems you just bashed it simply because Star Wars bashing is the in thing nowadays in /.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    4. Re:Very unimpressed by bourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Instead he cranked out more fodder, really for nothing more than to continue milking money out of the franchise. Looks like it's continuing.

      Let me take this opportunity to say this: Thank god that Peter Jackson filmed all three LOtR at once. Read why before you mod me offtopic:

      Lucas had a dream. He made Star Wars. It was... a little campy, in retrospect, but rollicking fun nonetheless.

      Years pass.

      Lucas made The Empire Strikes Back. It was much more serious. Darker. There's Dagobah and stuff. The sets, the effects, the tone all change. Why? Because Lucas now had better technology, and a different expectation to film for.

      Years pass.

      Lucas made Return of the Jedi. It was serious, yet fluffy. Dark, yet light. Wonderful effects, of course, now that years have passed. But again, the tone had shifted to become completely different. It reflected years of hindsight and expectations that affected the original artistic vision.

      And it's only getting worse with the prequels.

      Which is why I'm glad Peter Jackson shot all three LOtR films in one big go. Sure, the CGI is going to still be cranked out for a while. Editing can be affected by time. But overall, he has the chance to make a coherent hole of the trilogy, which is something I don't feel Lucas has been able to do with the time he's had. As Prufrock would say, time for a hundred visions and revisions...

    5. Re:Very unimpressed by elmegil · · Score: 2

      Of course, if you go back and watch the original movies, you may come away unimpressed with the whole mess of 'em. I know I was, despite loving them entirely as a preteen/teenager.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    6. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you guys get real. This is a movie for nine year olds. If you want to see a movie with developed characters and an intricate plot line, go see something else. Star Wars is made for children, and adults who just want to be entertained.

    7. Re:Very unimpressed by fleener · · Score: 3

      You talk as if we watch Star Wars for the visual effects and acting. No way. It's the musical score. George Lucas is not a composer. He can't muck it up. Episode II will rock.

    8. Re:Very unimpressed by Jackhamr · · Score: 1

      Wow. Couldnt have said it better myself.

    9. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's only getting worse with the prequels. Which is why I'm glad Peter Jackson shot all three LOtR films in one big go.

      How the hell can you have Natalie Portman with small boobs in Episode I and Natalie Portman with large boobs in Episode II if you shoot everything in one big go?

    10. Re:Very unimpressed by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      John Williams does do good work. However, it seemed to me that all the music in the trailer was taken directly from previous movies. Has he not yet recorded the music, or is he simply getting less original?

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    11. Re:Very unimpressed by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

    12. Re:Very unimpressed by Augusto · · Score: 2

      You are correct, the music (from all the trailers) are from previous Star Wars movies. I think this one was 2 or 3 from TESB.

      He's probably not done yet.

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    13. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Williams was certainly partially unavailable due to his Olympic involvement.

      But it is also very typical that the composer is unable to record the soundtrack until a rough cut of the film (sans a few special effects) has been completed. I know with the 'original' star wars, the recording dates were in mid-January. And its likely that this cut of the trailer was completed early February - so it may have been too early to get the real soundtrack.

      Of course, using real Star Wars source material (in particular the themes from Empire) help the trailer quite a bit, IMO. I *want* this to be a darker, more engaging movie - similar in tone to Empire. So thats a positive sign.

      Tom

    14. Re:Very unimpressed by Hagmonk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      coherent hole

      You knob.

      --
      Ash OS durbatulk, ash OS gimbatul, ash OS thrakatulk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul! Uzg-MS-ishi amal fauthut burgulli.
    15. Re:Very unimpressed by gsfprez · · Score: 2

      Being a member of the Freelancers Drum and Bugle Corps in 88 and 89, I was almost tearing up in both eyes at the sounds of "Forest Battle" from Return of the Jedi in that trailer.

      That was the song that we used to kick ass and take names with in 88 for our drum solo. The song was really fun, lots of for the altos, esp.. all those WHOOP WHOOOP WHOOOOOOPS! that John Williams is famous for making french horns want to kill themselves rather than put up with all that work.

      I love John Williams. He makes great music. You all can bite me.

      Hating John William is nearly the same thing as being a Patriots Fan in Feb 2002....

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    16. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that Irving Kirschner was more reponsible for the darker tone of Empire than Lucas, mainly because he'd been around so long that he made the movie he wanted and ignored Lucas.

      (Lucas wouldn't rehire him for Return of the Jedi, but I suppose the boxoffice $ proved him right. You might be able to explain the later films by hypothozing that Lucas has surrounded himself with too many asskissing fanboy techies.)

    17. Re:Very unimpressed by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      err... the LOTR story was written decades ago. Get a grip.

    18. Re:Very unimpressed by stevarooski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you've got a great point with this. When Lucas did American Graffiti and Star Wars, he was a relative unknown experimenting with new film technology. This gave him freedom from people's expectations, which is why Star Wars was such a hit. Now, look at where he's at today--people who love the vision of his original movie aren't impressed with his recent offerings because they really bring nothing new to the table, both in terms of story and in terms of film tech.

      Lucas has ALWAYS been one for new moviemaking toys. On one hand this is a good thing: he alone is responsible for getting ILM and the realm of realistic model-based special effects off the ground back in the Dark Ages of SFX. The same is true more recently for digital film. Hell, Kubrick used to shoot all of his films in mono because he was disgusted at the variance in theater quality. Thanks to Lucas, this may not be a problem in the very near future with digital projection.

      On the other hand, this dependance on glitzy looks has the adverse effect, at least on his films, of relieving focus on story. Yeah they look great. Yeah they'll sell lots of toys. Back in the 70's, they sold Star Wars to the masses. Now, in our CG-inundated world, audiences need more than this. As an example, someone posted earlier just to this effect, about wanting more impressive weapons instead of what was in the trailer. I agree. . .Since Lucas can't seem to have a great story AND great special effects anymore, I wholeheartedly agree--lets blow our socks off with special effects. :o)

      --

      - - - - - - - -
      Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
    19. Re:Very unimpressed by Performer+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is really excellent, because as you cheat yourself out of enjoying the film because you're foolish enough to prejudge this, the rest of us will probably love it because it's bigger and better than any of the other movies. I loved Ep. 4 when I was a kid, and my nephew loved Ep.1 and so did I. I'm really looking forward to Ep. 2, and your opinion won't matter an iota when the tidalwave of this movie arrives. So go ahead gripe and bitch, it says more about you than the film. Some people are just spoiled, they get Star Wars and it ain't enough they still find room to bitch and moan. Don't tell us how bad it is, nobody cares, just don't go and see it, I dare you. Of course there's no chance of that, you WILL see this movie. At least I'll get my moneys worth when I go see the film because I'll have a chance of enjoying it.

    20. Re:Very unimpressed by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      err... the LOTR story was written decades ago.

      You missed the point. Jackson's revisioning of Tolkien's work wasn't.

      [beavis] He said coherent hole ... heh heh. [/beavis]

    21. Re:Very unimpressed by Lac · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am afraid it is you who are mistaken about many things... You have a decent analysis, but your facts are all wrong. Of course, that is always a bad start.

      George Lucas did make the original Star Wars. And that movie turned out pretty much how you describe it. However, George Lucas did not make the two following films. Not really. Not in the sense we usually give that word.

      The Empire Strikes Back was directed by Irvin Kershner. Lucas is credited with the role of executive producer and with the story, but not the script. Apparently, Lucas gave Kershner a lot of leeway. Kershner put a lot of himself in the film, which explains why it stands out so vividly in the franchise. As for Lucas, he thought it was a bit too dark. (There is an anecdote, verified by Kershner, about Han's macho "I know" line, which he says to Leia when she tells him she loves him. Lucas didn't like the line and wanted it out, but Kershner held his ground. Lucas only let it stand after he saw how the public reacted in a private screening. Sad but true, Lucas would have preferred Han say "I love you too.")

      Now admittedly The Return of the Jedi looks more like a Lucas movie. But he still didn't direct it. He gave that job to Richard Marquand. Again, Lucas is the executive producer and is credited with the story, but not the script. Obviously the film is going to feel a bit different. Now apart from the advance in technology which you mention, I personnally see this film as a return to the aesthetics of the first film. I think that this is what Lucas wanted when he picked Marquand. Now, I understand that Lucas guided Marquand more than he had Kershner. But maybe Marquand just happened to share Lucas' tastes more than Kershner did.

      So do not be surprised if the movies look and feel different... They were made by diferent people. Funny thing is, I think Lucas used to be very open about all of this. But not anymore. He doesn't usually mention neither directed nor wrote the scripts to two of them. Kind of strange. So... As long as Lucas writes and directs the prequels, don't expect any one of them to turn out like Episode V. Especially since he didn't like it that much in the first place.

    22. Re:Very unimpressed by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      No I get the point, but go ahead and pretend I don't all you like. The film was very true to the book, the main plot was laid out decades ago. I don't buy the claim that them all being all filmed at once makes a significant difference in this case, especially when the person making the claim has only seen the first movie. Thank goodness they DIDN'T make attack of the clones decades ago, it'd be more like attack of the clone, besides Lucas almost bust the bank making the first film and was told it would flop. The time between films has allowed the Star Wars universe to grow and mature and gives Lucas something to build upon (not that I really give a shit). The Tolkein books were not all written instantly either.

    23. Re:Very unimpressed by wheany · · Score: 1
      No Jar-Jar
      Watch the "forbidden love" trailer again...
    24. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is he simply getting less original?

      He never was original. Listen to Holst's The Planets cycle. Maybe in the case of Star Wars, it was an intentional homage, but that doesn't explain why Jurassic Park is so derivative.

    25. Re:Very unimpressed by qurk · · Score: 1

      Pats win super bowl!!!! I read your comment 6 times and I just can't understand wth you mean. John Williams Star Wars scores rock, but Pats kick ass. If your unhappy Rams lost, lemme rub it in a little bit :) I took soooo much bs from Rams fans in the 3 weeks before the Super Bowl!!! I got the trailer, personally I think it's lookin good!

    26. Re:Very unimpressed by SerpicoWasTaken · · Score: 1

      I have to say I am very impressed with the reference to "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock". If I had the ability or knew how, I would mod you through the roof. That is my favorite poem of all time. It's nice to see some one else appreciates it.

    27. Re:Very unimpressed by Krieger · · Score: 2

      So what you're saying is that we need to get Kershner to redo all of the Star Wars movies and go lock Lucas in a cell and then show him the finished movies, which most likely not suck as much as his currently do.

      You did also forget to mention the work of Joseph Campbell on the first two and not on ROTJ.

    28. Re:Very unimpressed by aqu4fiend · · Score: 1

      The relationship between Holst's The Planets and the score to Star Wars is more than an intentional homage. (Compare Mars to the Imperial March). Legend has it that Lucas had been listening to Holst extensively and basically told Williams "Write me something like this".


      Keep in mind that there's nothing wrong with doing this; Williams is a genius to be able to so closely mimic a style. Unfortunately, he is a bit of a one-trick pony - as you noted, all of his work ends up sounding more or less the same.

    29. Re:Very unimpressed by mbennis · · Score: 0

      hum hum, JAR JAR is still here go watch again

    30. Re:Very unimpressed by geekoid · · Score: 2

      maybe, or perhaps there edxpectation will be so low, they'll enjoy it more then you?
      For the record, I think EP1 was the worse one of the serious. I feel he destroyed the mythology of star wars be explaining the force, felt there were too many scenes that where just there to show off the CG and not to tell a story.

      The trailer that was on Fox made me think "hmm, he produced a video game"
      The opening weekend ticket sale will be interesting.
      Will I see this movie? probable. WIll I see it in the theater? hard to say, but it will be the first one I won't see on opening night.
      I hopw I am wrong, I hope this movie is so damn good that I kick myself for not seeing it opening night. Since it is more about selling merchindise then telling a story, I doubt I'll regret it.

      I'm not a Jar-JAr hater,there where a great many things that sucked worse...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:Very unimpressed by tymesf · · Score: 1

      That's bogus. Eps 4-6 are really incredible, with the mythology, etc. IMHO this second one looks like it could be on par at least with TESB. OTOH, the hover/spacecraft scene left a bad taste in my mouth; it was such a terrible rip-off of fifth element. People are going to see these first three movies differently, because there are no real surprises. If Lucas doesn't pull a rabbit out of his hat after ep3, well, then you can chastise him all you want.

    32. Re:Very unimpressed by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      ...he has the chance to make a coherent hole of the trilogy
      I think you meant coherent whole, but given many people's opinion of TPM, this is much funnier :-)

    33. Re:Very unimpressed by XiRho · · Score: 1
      The Tolkein books were not all written instantly either


      Wrong. Tolkein wrote LOTR as a single book. When he brought it to publishers, they requested he break it into three books and have each released sequentially over a period of time.

    34. Re:Very unimpressed by elmegil · · Score: 2

      Luke Skywalker whining all the way through episode 4 was "really incredible"?? I don't think so. It was really incredible when I went to see it at age 10, when I was too immature to recognize what a brat Luke was being. It was only barely watchable when I went to see it again at age 30+. Some aspects of the series are, as you say, classic, but I'd say that there are dozens of movies that are more incredible in so many ways.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    35. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you're saying that tolkien wrote the massive volume that became the trilogy instantly?

    36. Re:Very unimpressed by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, John Williams has his ups and downs. If it were not for Harry Potter, I would have thought that he had run out of gas, much like Jerry Goldsmith seems to very rarely turn out a good soundtrack these days. The soundtrack for Episode I was extremely disappointing, the only positives being the Duel of the Fates and very few sections where music from the original movie was pulled in. The rest of the soundtrack was easily forgettable fluff.

    37. Re:Very unimpressed by Abreu · · Score: 1
      If you look at the clothes of the Gungan in that trailer, it doesnt look too much like JJB


      It could be a Gungan bodyguard to Padme

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    38. Re:Very unimpressed by Abreu · · Score: 1
      Actually, Tolkien wrote the story as a series of installments as correspondence to his son, who was fighting in WW2


      Thats why some parts of it remind you of the allied point of view during that conflict

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    39. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolkien said many times, that LOTR does not, and is not intended to, copy or emulate World War II.

      On another note: does anyone really think that Tolkien instantly wrote LOTR? I don't think so. It spanned many years. And, as someone mentioned in an earlier post, was released in installments.

    40. Re:Very unimpressed by jafac · · Score: 3, Funny

      .. . .and there was this one time, in band camp. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    41. Re:Very unimpressed by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Lucas may have had freedom from people's expectations with the original Star Wars, but Peter Jackson most certainly did not with Lord of the Rings.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    42. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes. We need Kershner to direct more movies like his Robocop 2, and Never Say Never Again.

    43. Re:Very unimpressed by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Tolkien said many times, that LOTR does not, and is not intended to, copy or emulate World War II.

      Yes, thats what he said, however if you are writing an epic novel while your country* and most of the countries around it are in the middle of a major conflict, its not logical to think that it will not influence your story one bit.

      I didnt say he did it on purpose, but at least some references to WW2 are there.

      * Tolkien was born in South Africa, but he always saw himself as british.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    44. Re:Very unimpressed by Krieger · · Score: 2

      Or not.

      Guess I should read the bio. However I wouldn't knock a Connery Bond film. They were the best of them thus far.

      Robocop 2 OTOH...

      Empire was good enough that I would, at a minimum, be interested in his vision for Star Wars. It was certainly a lot darker and more gritty and real then the rest of Star Wars. The ones from Lucas have seemed very... um... child-like happy, good, oh my! I can do without it.

    45. Re:Very unimpressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't tell us how bad it is, nobody cares, just don't go and see it, I dare you. Of course there's no chance of that, you WILL see this movie.

      Sure. We'll all download it and fast forward to the nude scenes.

    46. Re:Very unimpressed by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      My expectations are high, but this series has always delivered. AS for your video game comment, you need to go see final fantasy, now that was a video game. If you see the other trailers it's clear that in total this movie is lining up to be anything but a video game. There's more to critical judgement than just bashing something, which is what you are doing. All signs indicate a great movie, and to bash this on available evidence is just moronic. Like I said, don't go see the movie, I dare you.

  20. Final Fantasy by citizenc · · Score: 2

    Excellent point -- personally, I enjoyed Final Fantasy quite a bit. However, I'm a huge fan of the series, so I understood the underlying Gia themes. (It crops up several times throughout the series.)

    The problem that Final Fantasy encountered was bringing an anime-esque film to the mainstream audience.

    1. Re:Final Fantasy by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      I didn't have any trouble understanding the Gia theme... I just found it simplistic and dissapointing for the entire movie to sort of hinge on that as the great 'revelation' near the end of the piece, which was completely dissapointing.

      It wasn't just that either that made the movie swing a lot closer to the 'bad' movie pile than the 'good' one. It was the plethora of incrediably bad lines, absolute cheese which was meant to be taken seriously... truly sad.

    2. Re:Final Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem was bringing a crap-film to people who were expecting something remotely worth the amount spent on it.

      It's not like the stuff about Gaia went over people's heads, it's just that it's pretty hard not to laugh at it. Things just reveal their ridiculousness more when spoken vs. text in a video game.

    3. Re:Final Fantasy by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Excellent point -- personally, I enjoyed Final Fantasy quite a bit. However, I'm a huge fan of the series, so I understood the underlying Gia themes. (It crops up several times throughout the series.)

      Not familiar with it. However the Gaea concept is there. ;) I also have spent plenty of time telling people who thought FF:the Spirits Within was "too New Agey" that Shinto, a traditional Japanese religion holds that the land (sometimes the world, sometimes Japan specifically) has a spirit, along with many many other aspects of nature (all those little shrines throughout Japan are generally Shinto). Shinto predates Buddism in Japan. "New Age" indeed.

      Hideaki Anno might write using western religious imagery, but most asian authors (or any author in general) use the themeatic, mythic and metaphorical imagery of their own culture. Audiances from other cultures often miss fundimental points or think that a trite, overworked theme is new.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Final Fantasy by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      The problem that Final Fantasy encountered was bringing an anime-esque film to the mainstream audience.

      The problem that Final Fantasy encountered was that its plot was so twisted, poorly explained, and generally nonsensical that it proved impossible to care about the characters, their future, or indeed what the heck was even going on... another case of too cool CGI, too flawed writing.
    5. Re:Final Fantasy by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      I'm glad I saw Final Fantasy... once. I'm a big fan of anime, and Final Fantasy, but the plot of the movie bit ass. Still, it was impressive to look at, and that was worth the price of admission for me.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    6. Re:Final Fantasy by Glytch · · Score: 2

      The trick was to go in expecting total eye-candy. It worked for me. I think my money was well spent. :)

    7. Re:Final Fantasy by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      I had no problems understanding the plot or themes of the film. It was the predictable (and boring) nature of the plot that killed it for me. I have no idea why they spent so much time making it look GREAT, but didn't make the story better... It had all the worst aspects of a bad Hollywood film... Except those movies make money because stars are in them and people will (usually) go see stars, even if the movie is stupid.

    8. Re:Final Fantasy by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      I don't think most people cared about the Gaea theme. Most people cared that the dialogue was uninspired, that the plot was boring and predictable, and that the characters were one-dimensional (even though they were rendered well in three ;).

      GREAT graphics, TERRIBLE writing. And in a movie, a bad script kills a movie. It's not as big deal in a game, because you, to a certain extent make the story happen as you play.

    9. Re:Final Fantasy by colmore · · Score: 2

      you know, with that attitude, you might as well watch porn. i mean, nothing against porn, but i don't go around touting "Cummin Together" as great cenema, no matter how much I like the visuals.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    10. Re:Final Fantasy by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Oh, get off your high horse. Sometimes I watch movies for the plots, sometimes I watch for the graphics. Who do you think you are, trying to judge me?

      Not every movie has to make a Statement.

    11. Re:Final Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the movie was okay, but it would have looked better if they rendered it in color instead of black and white.

    12. Re:Final Fantasy by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Eh, I'd call the story formula. That's the biggest problem - when FF (the game) pulls from surrounding media, it's a tribute (a la Biggs and Wedge from Star Wars being in most of the games). When the movie pulled heavily from other media (Aliens, most notably, although to their credit, the Alien series had a profound effect upon Japanese movies) it just seemed like a cheap ripoff.

      The plot was functional - it could have sat at the center of a good story... but the story surrounding it wasn't well done. Certain scenes dragged, mostly due to certain impending events taking too long to occur. More subplots (which could have developed the characters) would have fleshed the movie out and made it into a much better final product.

      To their credit, however, that's a *very* common problem - that and the flipside: too much crap and too many characters tossed into the movie. Striking that balance requires an above average screenwriter and director... or a particularly exceptional director and actors who can take a small story and spin it out 2 hours into a compelling screen experience (which generally then winds up with the tag "arthouse movie", as it requires the appreciation of often subtle acting).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    13. Re:Final Fantasy by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      The thing is, tributes/homages/ripoffs work from movie to games because everyone wants to be in those movies (a Jedi in Star Wars, a badass space marine, etc.). You can also excuse some level of poor writing in a game because the player is experiencing it, and the game reacts to what they do - for example, moves at the pace they play.

      Movies aren't interactive, so if it drags or seems to simplistic, derivative or confusing, it ceases to work.

      I'll go on record as saying I can't think of many games with plot, dialogue and characters as good as a four star movie. So when you make a movie that is inspired by games (which are often inspired by movies), it usually doesn't go over too well...

      I think Square should have spent the money and hired a few good script doctors. They should have gotten William Goldman or someone in there to flesh it out, make it work better. It's crazy they spent the amount of money they spent on such a sub-par script. (Not that Hollywood doesn't do the same, but at least they have star power. Get Bruce Willis or someone in a clunker and at least it will open okay).

      FF started out okay, I was into it for the first 10 or 15 minutes - and I was VERY skeptical going in. But after that, it just lost me... I was almost dozing by the end. My girlfriend wanted to go before it was over, and she was completely looking forward to it before we went to see it.

    14. Re:Final Fantasy by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I'll go on record as saying I can't think of many games with plot, dialogue and characters as good as a four star movie.

      Square is good at the plot twist - which for CRPGs, like golden age SF, is very key. Chrono Cross is a good example of this. Movies can't or don't really rely on this too much anymore, at least partially due to spoilers by idiotic viewers. Books, Movies and CRPGs are three different media, and should be treated as such.

      I think Square should have spent the money and hired a few good script doctors.

      Agreed... they should have brought in an experienced screenwriter/scriptdoctor and also an experienced director and given them at least co-credit. No offense to them - they did a job that is far better than 98% of first attempt movies - they are incredibly talented people. But they were working in a new medium with stakes that were too high to screw up.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    15. Re:Final Fantasy by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Excellent point -- personally, I enjoyed Final Fantasy quite a bit. However, I'm a huge fan of the series, so I understood the underlying Gia themes. (It crops up several times throughout the series.)

      Understanding the Gaia theme doesn't require familiarity with the game series; it's not a tricky concept. The movies downfall was its lack of interesting characters, the absolutely terrible bottom-of-the-barrel dialogue (much coming from the supporting actors -- I really like Steve Buscemi, but he was badly used in this movie), and the uninteresting character development. Hell, I was glad when the supporting characters were killed off because I knew I wouldn't have to listen to them yapping anymore. It wasn't a moment of sadness, it was a moment of relief, which I doubt the movie was aiming for.

    16. Re:Final Fantasy by colmore · · Score: 2

      I'm not even talking about a Statement. It's not like there's no middle ground between Final Fantasy and Schindler's List.

      There are good movies with great graphics. Jurrasic Park, The Abyss, T2, the Matrix, the original Trillogy, the first two Alien Movies, were all popcorn and candy affairs, but they had enjoyable plots and knockout special effects.

      I'm glad Final Fantasy flopped. I wish every big budget special effects blockbuster with such a bad plot would do as poorly.

      Had they spent 1/100th the effort they did on special effects on writing a decent script, the movie still would have been knock-out gorgeous, and it would also have been watchable.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    17. Re:Final Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with the FF movie is that it sucked ass. Hi-res textures make nice wallpaper not a good movie. A bad script (that has almost no resumblance to the FF game series) and embarassing wooden animation of characters. Shrek's Fionna does more to advance the state of the art.

      Unlike the games, without FF in the title, you wouldn't know you were looking at something that was supposed to be part of the FF universe.
      FF isn't anime or even anime-esque. Square threw away millions to have a nice building in Hawaii and render on SGI's -- learning absolutely nothing from other studios ("Titanic" laughed at using SGIs). A decent script would have cost a pittance inc comparison

  21. Re:hmm.. by Sideswiped · · Score: 0

    Bit late for that... possibly on my 116th?

    Anyways its just seems like lucas is floundering here... focusing on too much of what audiences he wants to bring in and not on making an actual heart(though some would argue this point moot due to the theories of Lucas being tangibly heartless) backed film ,but maybe my cynicism has just gotten the best of me.. buhahaha no it hasn't haha.. Well maybe I'll be supprised and might actually like this cash cow. Only time will tell

    btw: "FP" or some shit like that *sarcasm* yahooo!! */sarcasm*

    ))Sideswiped))

  22. Summary of Posts by $carab · · Score: 5, Funny

    102 Posts saying the link is dead
    101 Posts reposting the original link
    57 Posts discussing /. effect
    4 Posts that rip-off yoda there be only
    13 Posts that post a new link, also dead
    12 Posts that declare that link dead
    41 Posts declaring that the trailer sucked, but that they'll see the movie anyway
    17 Posts declaring that the trailer sucked, but that they'll rent it
    2 Posts declaring that Star Wars is dead
    31 Posts declaring the dark side (Walmart?) alive

    1. Re:Summary of Posts by G-funk · · Score: 2

      You forgot:

      11 "All your trailer" posts
      8 "Summary of Posts" posts.

      Oops...

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Summary of Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 "You forgot:" posts.

    3. Re:Summary of Posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people reading this site are dweeb's. Get over it.

    4. Re:Summary of Posts by popular · · Score: 3, Funny

      And one post to bind them all!

    5. Re:Summary of Posts by ArcSecond · · Score: 1

      Dweeb's what? People reading this site are belong to Dweeb? Who is Dweeb? And why are Slashdotters his and his alone? What about Geek? Does he have none? Or Dork? Or you, the Yet-Another-Illiterate-Troll-Who-Has-Not-Yet-Grokk ed-The-Purpose-Of-The-Possessive-Apostrophe?

      --

      I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

  23. .mov file doesn't work from my harddrive by javacowboy · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the .mov from the site by searching the HTML source for the URL to the .mov file itself, pasting that in my browser, waiting for the movie to load again, and then doing a Page Save.

    Once I saved it onto my computer, I tried to play the trailer from my harddrive, but it gave me a message telling me I need QuickTime 5.02. I did Help About and it told me I HAVE QuickTime 5.02.

    What gives?

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:.mov file doesn't work from my harddrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ts a ploy. You need 5.02 with DRM or 6.0 pro. Apple wants to enforce a DRM (Digital Rights Management) system into your computers to spy on you and take away your rights!

      Quicktime 5, was not invasive and reswtrictive enough so they use this Star Wars bait to get you to foolishly "upgrade" to thier new DRM swill.

      People need to write a tool to take Quicktime 6 and reencode for Quicktime 5.

      Its bad enough that Apple historically gets these video coddecs by merely shopping and liscensing the object code of other corporations, but this new gambit of theirs is disgusting.

      I managed to copy the star wars trailers 32 megabyte .mov out of my netscape cache, but under Quicktime 5 PRO (the one you pay money to get) it bitches and only plays audio track.

      I refuse to ley apple "auto-update" I have a stable system and do not need spy ware or softsware installed that prevents me from decoding to my own gWorld video driver buffers to capture nice Star Wars key frame snapshots in hirez.

      The only reason to get these stupid trailers anyways is to show the hypocrisy and lies of Lucas. For example theo one big famous Episode One trailer shows a ship taking off from a planet but the video was actually run in reverse on purpose and he knew it. In the movie it was played in the correct animation frame order.

      Lucas rapes and violates the integrity of his own work and imagery so this new cheesy low-rez waxyh looking crap in Star Wars 2 is no big shock to me.

      Lord of the Rings is the new benchmark.

      Lucas should just retire or open up a Jar Jar Binks amusement park.

      Say no to DRM spyware

  24. Re:/.'ed and blocking referrals by un4given · · Score: 1, Funny

    Referral Denied
    You don't have permission to access "http://applesw.download.akamai.com/ep2/clone_war/ index.html" on this server.


    Your feeble OSX is no match for the power of Slashdot...

  25. Improved DivX Version Available by hugecyberpenis · · Score: 0

    Michael E. would never claim that music privacy is a bad thing. Music privacy is what makes the USA the best country in the world: everyone who makes music should make money and that's why we have musical privacy. Bill Gates will eat you.

    --

    This sig intentionally Left Bank.

  26. Re:hmm.. by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny

    So they show the trailer on Fox and then tell you to see "Ice Age" in order to see the theatrical version of the trailer...wow. A trailer for a trailer, with an inline hype for another picture. Wonder if the actual movie is that creative... rj

  27. Quicktime pro is needed for hi-res version by Augusto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quicktime pro is required to view the hi=res trailer, that's what people are complaining about, not the silly nag screens.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Quicktime pro is needed for hi-res version by Axe · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is NOT required. Open QuickTime player. Go to FILE, open URL: http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/gate /ep2_clone_war_p640.mov Then it will just play - full screen at all. Apple people are f&cking clowns.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    2. Re:Quicktime pro is needed for hi-res version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This works for QuickTime on Mac OS X. Haven't tried elsewhere though...

      Name: MACOS QA
      Serial: WT8Q-UQPJ-PAEU-P3RT-CA8D
      (Leave Organisation blank)

      Now this is thinking different...

    3. Re:Quicktime pro is needed for hi-res version by ryskt · · Score: 1

      The people at Apple aren't "f&cking clowns". The majority of people who use the internet and would be viewing trailers at their site are the clowns. I seriously doubt that Apple really cares if you view the trailer at full size. The Quicktime Pro b.s. is there for those who don't have the intelligence to view the sourcefile in the player. I would imagine that even with your little bit of Slashdot rebelliousness, they'll still sell quite a few licenses to Quicktime Pro with this little ploy. So just calm down. Sheesh, you'll wake the neighbors.

  28. ...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue... by jdbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's so many odd tensions inherent in seeing the latest Lucas movie/product that it's tough to sort them all out...

    - Lucas's movies from the 70's are the primary reason (debatably equal with Spielberg's movies) for the "blockbuster-centric" state of the movie industry today. (i.e. opening weekend-oriented, with receipts fading fast even for popular films, therefore "hyper-able" films with a fast return get the most attention). ergo, supporting a new Lucas film is consistent _not only_ with generally supporting the MPAA, but also with supporting the "big (and not necessarily smart, therefore often stupid) movies advertised with big $$" business model which the major studios are so slavishly following.

    (hey! lucas started a tsunami of crap! he's indirectly responsible for tomb raider! lucas is bad!)

    - OTOH, Lucas is in the ultra-elite group of filmmakers who is beholden to _none_ of the movie studios (i.e. MPAA). He doesn't _have_ to create "big blockbusters", this is the kind of movie he _wants_ to make. Lucas even has the clout to create his own distribution company (in addition to Lucasfilm's production end), ala the Spielberg/Geffen/Katzenberg Dreamworks, were he interested.

    (hmm... lucas is powerful! but independent... therefore good?)

    - Lucas has, in fact, been using his clout to push digital production _and_ display techniques (which would be going faster were it not for distributor/theater overgrowth and mismanagement... which is a side result of the "blockbuster mentality, but I digress...). Aesthetic questions of "digital film" aside), these techniques can dramtically lower distribution costs while increasing theater flexibility, and thereby create new opportunities for distribution and showing of "non-blockbuster" films (independent or otherwise low(er) budget)...

    (yay! Lucas is good! he's undoing what he hath wrought! and doing cool digitial stuff! Lucas is good!)

    - Lucas's narratives tend to reflect a rather benevolently feudal/fascist view of the world, in which an elite group (Jedi) rules over/provides protection to the general classes; he has furthermore stated his preference for "benevolent dictator" style organization for his businesses (Lucasfilm/ILM/etc.), as well as indicating that his films are very specifically his own (versus "for the fans")... this idealized feudalism is further reflected in his deity-like relationship with his (legions of) fans. i.e. Lucas' s "independent" streak is very much a part of a tendency towards complete control over his work.

    (boo! Lucas is anti-democratic... but he's an artist, so it's OK... but he does this in business, too... and see how he treats his fans... but we love him! Lucas is, uh, is...)

    Anyway, Lucas's position in Hollywood/business practices/audience relations/artistic bent are very much an integrated and consistent (but still complex) thing - at least to the point that it's hard to reduce it to pure "good" or "bad". Let's just call Lucas a unique, smart, lucky bastard and focus on more concrete matters.

    Just something to chew on.

  29. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by bourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I guess that Lucas is flattering The Fifth Element. Or am I the only one who had a little deja vu with the "speeding through three dimensional traffic patterns with futuristic cars, followed by vertical plunge shot?"

    Also, blocking slashdot referrals? No class.

    Requiring quicktime pro for the large screen trailer? No class.

    Yet another "milk the shoddy trilogy" moment.

    1. Re:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      Or am I the only one who had a little deja vu with the "speeding through three dimensional traffic patterns with futuristic cars, followed by vertical plunge shot?"

      And to top it off, the car they were in was yellow. Did anyone notice a checker pattern? :-) I'm waiting for this scene later on:

      Yoda: Mmm. Great distance he has travelled to be here.
      Obi-Wan: Yeah, I know. I was there when he took off.

      And what's up with the "I hate flying" schtick? Was that Ewan MacGregor or Woody Allen? Looks like typical Lucas: Lame dialogue framing kick-ass battle sequences. I'm not looking forward to the Kenobi/Skywalker buddy-cop scenes. But it should be interesting to see the political conflict between the Jedi and Palpatine. (ObRipoff: Shades of the Alliance and Pres. Clark in Babylon 5?)

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by Ford+Fulkerson · · Score: 1
      And what's up with the "I hate flying" schtick? Was that Ewan MacGregor or Woody Allen?


      I thought it came right from Raiders of the Lost Ark, where Indy describes how he hate snakes in the beginning of the film and is forced to deal with them later. Exact same thing here, if the trailer is to be believed.

      --

      Somewhere in the heavens... they are waiting.
    3. Re:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      But it should be interesting to see the political conflict between the Jedi and Palpatine. (ObRipoff: Shades of the Alliance and Pres. Clark in Babylon 5?)

      I love bab5, but they did not create Evil vs Good conflict.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by Refrag · · Score: 2

      Apple has given the QuickTime file format to the MPEG consortium for MPEG4, they provide the QuickTime Movie Trailers service gratis, and they give away Streaming Server with the code.

      Shouldn't they be entitled to a little bit of money ($29.99 for QuickTime Pro) if you want to watch the largest trailer they have which in turn costs them the most in terms of bandwidth?

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    5. Re:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by jafac · · Score: 2

      yum! Natalie Portman in the Milla Jojovich white band-aid costume. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery... by Ryu2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      They block all non Apple or Lucas referrals, not just Slashdot. I tried linking from my personal home page, and it failed as well.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  30. Offtopic? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is that offtopic?????? what?!?! Stupid moderators.

    1. Re:Offtopic? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumeably they though it was the closest match to "-1 Get a life, you whiney nerd"...

  31. Too Much Movie For one Trailer! by Schrader · · Score: 1

    I was amazed at the quantity of different scenes they managed to show in the trailer! Heck, for the amount of epic battle scenes you could probably get two movies!

    Ok. I was not very impressed with the episode one, but I am willing to pony up for the next two. Even if they end up sucking, I think the first three (or second three movies (if you think about it)) movies make the $16 worth it.

    At VERY least, I know I will get to see some of the best special effects ever made. Say what you will about story, but nowhere at the movies will you find a better exibition of cutting edge CGI and special effects. Nowhere.

  32. Dissapointing post by Augusto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually what is most disappointing, is the constant non-stop whining about how the new trilogy sucks.

    C'mon people, please come up with new reasons for not liking the prequels. Do we have to constantly read about "continue milking money out of the franchise" ?

    The movie looks like fun, big battles, cool characters, etc. If you've seen previous star wars films you know what to expect. Just saying , "it's not creative" enough amounts to saying nothing. What do you want ? I really doubt that you could come up with anything more creative that the visuals and excitement in those few minutes of the trailer.

    Oh BTW, your post is not "creative". Did I already mention that ? :-)

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Dissapointing post by l810c · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >C'mon people, please come up with new reasons >for not liking the prequels.

      Here are a few of mine.
      -JJB
      -Pod Race kinda cool, but a lot of eye candy filler contributes nothing to story.
      -Final battle, a bunch of the worst characters ever created lobbing big blue bouncy balls at CGI driods on the Windows XP desktop.
      -Samual Jackson, love him but he is No Jedi
      -Yoda ain't even good
      -Anikan, baaaddd actor; glad he's gone at least
      -The Force is bajillions of tiny creatures living inside all of us. Hahahahaha *choke*

    2. Re:Dissapointing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's mine:

      The last movie was FUCKING BORING. That's all there is to it. That's all I need.

      Will I watch the next one? Maybe eventually. But if the last one sucked, why would I think the next one would be any better?

    3. Re:Dissapointing post by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Star Wars is suffering from the Star Trek movies syndrome? And if that's true, Episode II should kick ass.

      For those that don't know, the story is something like all odd numbered ST movies suck, and the even numbered movies are good.

    4. Re:Dissapointing post by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Sorry, doesn't pan out. You're basically putting A New Hope and Jedi in the same boat as Episode 1.

      Besides, ST:Insurrection was bad ass.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    5. Re:Dissapointing post by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you look at it. By release date, you're right. Speaking chronologically, on the Star Wars time line, ANH and Jedi are 4th and 6th, but even then that doesn't pan out perfectly, since Empire would then be an odd number, and it was the best of all, IMHO.

      Gotta disagree with you on Insurrection though, it sucked ball.

    6. Re:Dissapointing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Personally I find it amusing that people complain that the new trilogy isn't creative enough. The old trilogy wasn't creative at all. It was trite, hackneyed, space opera. It's not even sci-fi, the plot could be lifted out and placed in any setting with the same effect. It was a cheesy, campy kids movie, and I loved every minute of it.

    7. Re:Dissapointing post by Snaller · · Score: 1

      I really doubt that you could come up with anything more creative that the visuals and excitement in those few minutes of the trailer.


      Perhaps he couldn't - but I could :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    8. Re:Dissapointing post by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Sorry, doesn't pan out. You're basically putting A New Hope and Jedi in the same boat as Episode 1.

      Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well. Maybe the curse works on trilogies. The first trilogy (1-3) sucks, the second is good (4-6), the third will suck as well? Doesn't leave a good taste in my mouth, but it sounds realistic.

      Besides, ST:Insurrection was bad ass.

      Whoops! You made a typo. I think you meant to say "ST:Insurrection was bad & assinine."

  33. mirror in australia/asia pac by jason+andrade · · Score: 1

    for people in australia/asia pacific:

    movie trailers


    it's mirrored in avi (divx needed?) and mpeg from the callihq site.

    ep2_clone*

  34. Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacular? by Fweeky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right, big ships, a few explosions and some dodgy gunk-cum-plasma firing guns.

    When are we going to see films that really capture the true scale of the energy levels we're going to be flinging around? I don't want to see ships throwing primary coloured blobs at each other, I want to see them fling high yield nukes, antimatter weapons that light up the sky and threaten to melt any surface nearby, I want to see missiles that fill space with incandescent plasma that fades before being blown appart as it's lanced by otherwise invisible beams of radiation.

    I want to see acceleration an issue; I want to see people who couldn't get to a chair to scream in agony as they get crushed down by high G forces or get torn to bits by decompressions, not a few panels exploding and some lame shaking.

    I want to see ground troops frying acres of land as they desperately try to kill an enemy, I want to see them blowing shit up with gauss guns and worryingly powerful antimatter devices, or proper ray guns where you only see what's reflected off dust and things they're melting/frying (and which cause the atmosphere to explode like lightning). Screw phasers.

    I want to see believable universes, filled with Humans for a change; no humanoid "aliens" who happen to act like certain stereotypes (aliens will, of course, get a look in, but not as human analogs ffs); there's huge scope for different cultures, technologies, types of people and things people will become (from tweaked to entirely redesigned) that you get with humans alone without having to think up Unlikely Stereotypical Alien-with-ridged-forehead-and-attitude-problem 31338.

    Of course, it's not going to happen.. tried and tested paper thin plots and people and a few shiny special effects is just too damn easy to throw together and make money out of.

    <fume>

  35. WARNING: HUGE SPOLIER by Dr+Kool,+PhD · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just saw the trailer and it contains a HUGE SPOLIER!! Stop reading NOW if you don't want to hear it.

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Luke Skywalker's father is DARTH VADER!! Who would have thought??

    1. Re:WARNING: HUGE SPOLIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and after Luke has sex with him he learns that Darth Vader is not a woman!

  36. I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by sleight · · Score: 5, Interesting

    See, George Lucas' inspiration for Star Wars came largely from a man by the name of Joseph Campbell. If you're unfamiliar with him, he was a renowned mythologist (really a mish-mash of cultural anthropologist and psychologist with a focus on cultural dialectics).

    Mythology is rarely original. In fact, Campbell, were he alive, would likely point out that there are only a handful of basic mythological stories and most every contemporary myth has some root in a far more generic myth.

    So, my point: indeed, there isn't anything original about Star Wars. It's just another way of characterizing a myth, in this case, the fall from grace, that has been around for thousands of years.

    1. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by prizog · · Score: 2

      That there are only a handful of basic plots does not mean that nothing original can be done. What is original is not the what, but the who and the why. In the case of SW, the who appears to be chosen purely by marketting concerns, and the why chosen not to offend anyone.

    2. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Augusto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > In the case of SW, the who appears to be chosen purely by marketting concerns,

      Marketing concerns ? A trilogy about how the main character becomes the main villian. A prequel instead of a sequel (which is what most fans originally wanted). A movie about a separatist movement inside of a galactic republic ?

      You must be a marketroid if you attribute that to marketing zombies !

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    3. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While Lucas may have used Cambell as a consultant, he wasn't making a myth, he was making a sci-fi action movie. There were many original elements...nowhere in Cambell's writing (or classic mythology) will you hear about the holographic chess they played on the Millenium Falcon, for instance.

      Besides, there's obvious differences between myths, with some containing elements not contained in others, despite a similarity in theme. Oedipus Rex (for instance) shares many themes with Star Wars, but Luke hardly killed Darth Vader and had sex with Natalie Portman. The stories of Hercules and Jesus are very very similar, but their perception, and their effect, are entirely different. Cambell didn't claim that all myths were the same, he made a checklist of thematic similarities.

      I think a more accurate depiction of myth is that there's certain basics beliefs and themes programmed into our minds, and any story has to take these primal beliefs and apply them to our constantly-changing environment, with more sucessful, elementary stories getting elevated to "myth." Another poster claimed the reliance on primal themes means there's no possibility of telling new stories - instead, I think in a more rapidly changing world, there's more possibility (and necessity) of telling new stories.

      What holds Star Wars back from being a myth is that it's kind of silly and will probably be ignored as time goes on...

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only partially right. Although Lucas was inspired partly by the archetypes that Campbell discusses in A Hero with a Thousand Face, he was also influenced by the manikianist (sp?) which as active around 300 ad and formed the idea of dualism. This was the idea that good and evil effect our lives in almost an identical way to the idea of the force of black vs. white, or the ying and yang. The difference was that this was in northern Africa and influenced St. Augustine (author of Confessions and a big influence on Christian reasoning). So when you say Campbell influenced Lucas you are only partly right. He was more influenced by the roots of Christianity.

      Campbell just said look, there are all these similarities between stories all over the world and called them archetypes.

    5. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by dswensen · · Score: 3

      You're quite right. In fact, Lucas has said many times himself (both in commentary and in interviews) that he considers the Star Wars series to be like variations on a theme. This is why characters end up in the same situations, saying similar things, and why everyone ends up on Tattooine sooner or later :)

      The films aren't supposed to be constantly breaking new ground and reinventing the dramatic wheel. Furthermore, I think there's a little hypocrisy in expecting them to. I can only imagine the hubbub that would ensue if Lucas decided "oh, I've done this Force and lightsabers nonsense for five movies... I'm not putting them in the next one."

    6. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Folks, fiction ain't technology. There are no new ideas in the world of plot and characterization. Depending on how finely you slice it, there are only a dozen or so possible plots that make sense to Western minds. You can twiddle with the setting, juggle the characters around a bit, but all you will ever do is create a variation on one of a handful of dreadfully familiar themes. What distinguishes good fiction (and art in general) from bad is the author's mastery of his technique. How many blues songs are based on minor variations of the same twelve-step chord progression? Most of them, both good and bad.

      Milking the franchise? I suppose that's what Sophocles was doing with his Oedipus trilogy which is, IMHO, the ultimate source of the Darth Vader/Luke Skywalker/Obi Wan Kenobi subplot. I wonder if we can have a nice thread now about how Oedipus at Colonus was much less imaginative than Oedipus Tyranneus.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    7. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by kubla2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, Campbell drew on Robert Graves, who himself drew on Sir James Frazer and W.B. Yeats and so on...

      Campbell, Graves as well as very many other mythographers before them recognised that, in Graves' words, "There was one story, and one story only". The study of myth is often just an attempt to relocate its sources. These sources aren't only in literature. They're in all manner of unexplainable things: nature, science, psychology, dream, etc. They all fuel our imaginations and, given that we've not really changed that much over time (we're just a bit better at explaining things and hence, behaving 'rationaly').

      One great appeal of the original Star Wars trilogy is that was so faithful to the pattern of proto-myths described by Campbell, Graves and others. The Phantom Menace though, seems more concerned with being faithful to the orginal trilogy than any of the more unversal mythological legends. It's probably why they feel more shallow, more commercial and less about those things that matter to all of us.

      No big loss though. The eye candy is great. Most of us will enjoy it. There will be other story tellers who will captivate us with wickedly spun tales.

    8. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The stories of Hercules and Jesus are very very similar, but their perception, and their effect, are entirely different.

      I took a course in Greek Mythology and am very familiar with the Christian Bible and I'd like to ask you one question: What kind of weed were you smoking when you thought that line up?

    9. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by eostrom · · Score: 1

      Campbell, were he alive and posting to Slashdot, would likely point out the myth of a Beowulf cluster of these.

    10. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by lblack · · Score: 1

      Campbell, while he was alive, did indeed point that out. It's in my preface of "The Hero With A Thousand Faces".

      It was the entire basis of his mythological discourse. While some stories appeared to be absolutely removed from Western experience (such as Water-Jar Boy), Campbell found several methods of linking these to both Classical and Oriental myths.

      Unfortunately, Campbell may have rationalised too far the meaning of myths. Several people have spoken out against him on the basis that, while he does show parallels and connections across distinct mythologies, he formed those on the basis of the Judao-Christian philosophy.

      The argument distills down to the idea that if you're following Campbell's teachings, you're missing a whole lot about what any non-Western myth means. Water-Jar boy isn't necessarily about the boys reunion with his father, and that would be considered a minor portion of the story to the people who actually tell it.

      leem

    11. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by prizog · · Score: 1

      There is nothing unmarketable about such a story -- it's not like he's going to screw princess Leia or something. Anyway, read what I said -- the *plot* is not so exciting (according to the original poster, anyway). The *characters* are chosen for marketting purposes -- specifically, Jar-Jar.


      You must be a marketroid if you attribute that to marketing zombies !


      I used to work for a marketting company. Sorry.

    12. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Augusto · · Score: 2


      There is nothing unmarketable about such a story -- it's not like he's going to screw princess Leia or something. Anyway, read what I said -- the *plot* is not so exciting (according to the original poster, anyway). The *characters* are chosen for marketting purposes -- specifically, Jar-Jar.


      And you know what the plot is ? And what's not exciting about the fall of the Republic and it's turn to the Empire, with a gigantic battle that includes dozens of Jedi ! I'm sorry, but I don't know what the heck you're talking about.

      What does marketable mean ? Givin fans what they want ? He has his own story to tell, and if it was %100 only marketing driven, there will be no Jar Jar in this movie (which there is, even tough a little, apperantly), and again, he wouldn't be making a pre-quel but a sequel which is what most people wanted.

      People just want to say , marketing driven, or he's out to just make money, to excuse their dislikes of the prequels. Why don't you wait to see the movie and then judge it ?


      I used to work for a marketting company. Sorry.


      Knew it, LOL !

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    13. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by prizog · · Score: 2

      Why don't you wait to see the movie and then judge it ?

      Because I'm boycotting the major studios until they stop suing Eric Corley. I suggest that you do the same.

    14. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Augusto · · Score: 2

      You do know that Lucasfilm is not one of the major "Hollywood studios" do you ? ;-)

      They use Fox for what, distribution I think ? But they have very little to do with the big studios that pump out films at a much higher rate than Lucasfilm (their last movie was Phantom Menace, years ago ! )

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    15. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by prizog · · Score: 2

      If they use Fox for distribution, then Fox gets a share of the money I would pay to go see the movie. I can't in good conscience give them my money, knowing that it will be used to sue innocents like Corley. Anyway, it's not just distribution -- the new SW movies (at least 2 and 3, dunno about 1) are made at Fox studios.

    16. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by delcielo · · Score: 2

      While it may be useful and informative to point out Lucas' affinity for reading Campbell, I think it's rather absurd to have a discussion in which Star Wars and mythology are used in the same sentence.

      It was a movie. It was a great movie. It was a movie. Get a life. And if you think Star Wars is culture, please remove yourself from the world, and stop using up perfectly good air.

      Any serious student of mythology should be insulted by the direction of this conversation.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    17. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by prizog · · Score: 1

      Any serious student of mythology will look at modern myths to make sure their theories still work. Campbell certainly didn't spurn SW-- he described it as "good, sound teaching." I don't agree with Campbell here -- I'm with Brin on what SW teaches (if on little else).

      Star Wars is certainly reflective of American culture, and it has influenced it. Whether or not that's a good thing depends on your view of SW (see Brin). I would rather see SW influence the world than Starship Troopers (the book -- I have heard that the movie is significantly different). I would rather still see _Erin Brockovitch_ influence the world than SW.

      I love your elitist attitude, tho. You'll go far with that.

    18. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.

      The poster who said that LucasFilm uses Fox as a distributor, and solely a distributor, is correct.
      As fas as I recall, the reason they do so is a contractual obilgation dating back to the original SW contract.
      If I recall, other obligations fell by the wayside just prior to TPM being made, giving Lucas more lattitude and not being bound as tightly to Fox for SW-related films.

    19. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by prizog · · Score: 2

      Is starwars.com good enough for you?

      Maybe they don't have a contractual obligation -- but they *did* produce Ep2 at Fox Studios.

    20. Re:I suppose that you're unfamiliar with mythology by kubla2000 · · Score: 2

      The stories of Hercules and Jesus are very very similar, but their perception, and their effect, are entirely different.

      I took a course in Greek Mythology and am very familiar with the Christian Bible and I'd like to ask you one question: What kind of weed were you smoking when you thought that line up?

      It wasn't my comment but I'm glad it was made. The stories of Jesus and Hercules are very similar. The details vary, but the structures are very, very similar. Likewise, the story of Ogmius (the Celtic equivelant of the legend) follows the same pattern.

      No one would be offended if someone compared Ogmius to Hercules. Somehow drawing a parallel with Jesus causes offence. Why? Jesus was himself very conscious of the power of myth and used it in his teachings as well as in his political power struggles.

      And to bring things back to the thread, it's the theme of the self-sacrificing son which dominates the original Star Wars trilogy. Everything builds to that climax where Luke proves his love for his father in Episode VI. Yes, it's 'just a movie' but the reason it was so successful and popular is that it picked up on what all the mythographers mentioned in this thread would have termed, an "eternal" or "proto" myth.

  37. Apple wants to enforce new DRM spyware in Qt6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a ploy. Apple wants to enforce a DRM (Digital Rights Management) system into your computers to spy on you and take away your rights!

    Quicktime 5, was not invasive and reswtrictive enough so they use this Star Wars bait to get you to foolishly "upgrade" to thier new DRM swill.

    People need to write a tool to take Quicktime 6 and reencode for Quicktime 5.

    Its bad enough that Apple historically gets these video coddecs by merely shopping and liscensing the object code of other corporations, but this new gambit of theirs is disgusting.

    I managed to copy the star wars trailers 32 megabyte .mov out of my netscape cache, but under Quicktime 5 PRO (the one you pay money to get) it bitches and only plays audio track.

    I refuse to ley apple "auto-update" I have a stable system and do not need spy ware or softsware installed that prevents me from decoding to my own gWorld video driver buffers to capture nice Star Wars key frame snapshots in hirez.

    The only reason to get these stupid trailers anyways is to show the hypocrisy and lies of Lucas. For example theo one big famous Episode One trailer shows a ship taking off from a planet but the video was actually run in reverse on purpose and he knew it. In the movie it was played in the correct animation frame order.

    Lucas rapes and violates the integrity of his own work and imagery so this new cheesy low-rez waxyh looking crap in Star Wars 2 is no big shock to me.

    Lord of the Rings is the new benchmark.

    Lucas should just retire or open up a Jar Jar Binks amusement park.

    Say no to DRM spyware

    (repeated because a moderator keeps marking this as TROLL)

  38. ahh thats better! by mholt108 · · Score: 1

    Mulch Better;

    This is what we pay uncle george for. As for not original comments - shut up! That is what we have art house for you idiots! This is STAR WARS (duuuhhhh!!)

  39. Direct link to the movie by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the (hidden) direct link to the movie in "large format" (640x288):

    http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/gate /ep2_clone_war_p640.mov

    From this link, you can save the entire 31MB movie to hard disk and play it whenever you want without downloading it again. I'm sure that they'll appreciate me doing this to help reduce the load on their server.

    1. Re:Direct link to the movie by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      now if only i cared enough to watch it.

      You care enough to read about it, read people's comments about it, download it, but don't care enough to watch it? I'm confused.

    2. Re:Direct link to the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really HATE apple's slow connection...

      wget http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/32te e/ep2_clone_war_m320.mov

      Connecting to starwars.apple.com:80... connected!
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: 8,183,000 [video/quicktime]

      [after a few hours, wget happily reports...]

      300K 4% @ 53.34 B/s

      Yes, this is 53 BYTES/s ladies and gentlemen. Thank God I'm currently downloading a linux friendly MPEG version from one of the mirrors that people have set up.

    3. Re:Direct link to the movie by Fledsbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      To make this work:

      wget --referer=http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/ clonewar_lg.html http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/gate /ep2_clone_war_p640.mov

    4. Re:Direct link to the movie by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh, mesa thinks that someone in the company had already downloaded it, i got it with 5 megabytes pr sec. for once I was happy about having our proxy.

    5. Re:Direct link to the movie by ruggerboy · · Score: 1

      So, um, in your "rants"....why do you assume all /. readers are "pasty-white"? Black men are not smart enough for cumputers???

    6. Re:Direct link to the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, um, in your "rants"....why do you assume all /. readers are "pasty-white"? Black men are not smart enough for cumputers???

      First, I was referring to those people who think it's "a thrill to get "first post" on Slashdot." That's not "all /. readers."

      Second, "pasty white" was a euphemism for people that don't get out enough (e.g., not enough sunlight). I didn't think that someone would be offended by not being considered a maladjusted introvert.

  40. People dislike Ep1/2 cause it's chic... by awilber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is it becoming "cool" to rebel (!) against the new Episodes?

    1. Re:People dislike Ep1/2 cause it's chic... by JordoCrouse · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is it becoming "cool" to rebel (!) against the new Episodes?

      Works for me. That way I can actually go see the movie without having to stand in line next to some freak in a Wookie outfit.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    2. Re:People dislike Ep1/2 cause it's chic... by dswensen · · Score: 2

      I'm sure the people doing the "rebelling" think so.

  41. Jar Jar Binks is BACK! Hurray! I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People assumed that Jar Jar would not be in the second episode at all. The trailers confirm he is back, I win the bets.

    Even if he has diminished role or negligible role, the fact that Jar Jar is still present allows me to tell people who hate tJar Jar to avoid this low-rez cgi swill by merely reminding them they will have to see Jar Jar again.

  42. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

    Can't agree more. Two capital ships dueling with weapons that could level an entire planet is infinitely more cool than a bunch of little starfighters (that are never, ever going to exist in real life) somehow blowing apart a ship hundreds of times larger by ramming into its bridge. The sight of a nuclear explosion tearing across the hull of some hulking battlecruiser would be like a dream. But, like you said, it's never gonna happen.

    As a quick side note, special effects for a more realistic space battle would probably be a lot more spectacular than anything we're seeing here.

    --
    If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
  43. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by halo8 · · Score: 1

    WOW!!! I want this guy to make a video game

    I want to play this video Game

    and then if it was massivly muliplayer.. ya.. I would want that to.

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  44. Jar Jar back?! Shocking. Ten serious reservations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was saddened and perplexed to see that Jar Jar is back even though he was supposed to be eliminated entirely. Lucas needs to listen and read these 10mostly unranked reasons Jar Jar should have been totally written out of Episode 2.

    1 ** Sufferin' Succotash, Speech Impediment:

    I understand that Lucas has a difficult task in creating a rich and diverse universe of alien races, each of which needs its own unique culture, look, and language. But he couldn't come up with anything better than "Moi moi, I wuv you!?" This is the first in a series of things that makes Jar Jar less realistic and more cartoonish than necessary.

    2 ** Jar Jar, Future Winner of the Darwin Award

    All right, you've got a stampede of frightened jungle creatures bearing down on you. They're followed by elephantine troop transports. Also, there's this jedi-hippy Qui-Gon guy heading right at you. What do you do? If you've got any survival instincts at all, you run. YOU RUN! Any creature, big or small, that doesn't flee simply deserves to have its genes exterminated.

    2 ** Benedict Arnold. Twice!

    Jar Jar, cowardly turncoat, reveals the ultra-secret refuge of his race not once, but twice! First, he reveals where the "secret" underwater city is after about 10 seconds of interrogation. Later, he doesn't even need any prodding to reveal where the backup secret "sacred" place is. I'm sure not telling him where my Y2K survival cabin is.

    3 ** Five-Fingered Discount.

    MOS ESPA POLICE BLOTTER - Tuesday, 10:45 AM. Local merchant reports that a passer-by attempted to shoplift from a street display of food. The perpetrator was described as a pink male, approximately 7 feet tall, with ritualistic tattoos covering both of his arms. Anyone with information on this crime is encouraged to call the Mos Espa police department's Crime Watch Hotline.

    4 ** Bring the GPS Receiver, Jar Jar's 'Navigating.'

    "We're going through the planet core, we'll need a navigator." (Or something like that.) Real bang-up job on that, Mr. Binks. He doesn't actually know where anything is, can't give even the most general helpful hint, and in fact, panics during some rather tense moments during the fish chase scene, constituting a distraction which had a very real chance to cause physical harm. Of course, with the force to guide them, the jedi come out ok, but this begs an explanation for why a navigator was so necessary in the first place.

    5 ** Road Trip, Destination Mos Espa.

    I simply can think of a but single reason Qui-Gon takes Jar Jar along with him on his mission to find a replacement Nubian warp drive. Qui-Gon secretly planned to sell Jar Jar into slavery when nobody was looking, in order to make money for the parts. That was a plan that I'm sure most audience members could have gotten behind. Unfortunately, Padme/Amidala insisted on tagging along, ruining Qui-Gon's plans.

    6 ** Who Framed Jar Jar Rabbit?

    Jar Jar is supposed to be the first major photo-realistic character in a motion picture completely generated by computers. Realistic. So why is he able to violate several of Newton's laws when he jumps into the water in a completely cartoon-like way? Star Wars is not a cartoon. When he's in Watto's shop, why does he juggle robot parts in the same non-Newtonian way? Star Wars is NOT A CARTOON. When he runs from the blue energy balls, once again--cartoon! George, I'll say it one more time--STAR WARS IS NOT A CARTOON.

    7 ** Sun Tzu He Ain't.

    Pity the Gungans. They're lead by Boss Nass, a man so blinded by his own inferiority complex that he decides to send his people into a slaughter to prove that not only aren't the Naboo thinkin theysa betta than tha Gungans, but the Gungans may in fact be betta than tha Naboo. Then, the Gungans have Captain Tarpals, who selects his second in command based upon, well, apparently no logic at all, since he selects Jar Jar. And of course, they're led into battle by "General" Jar Jar, who surrenders at the first opportunity (To an army with orders to commit genocide, no less! "Wipe them out--All of them!" Surrender means certain death!). Indeed, the sum total of JJ's military brilliance consists of saying, "Steady, steady." Such is the art of warfare.

    8 ** Miscellaneous Dumb Quirks.

    The Gungans have a law actually called 'Nocomebackie'? What the heck does "Maxi big da force" mean anyway? (If it means "The force is big," well, that's so dumb it hurts.) What's with Jar jar and the poop 'n' fart jokes? And did Lucas really name the whole race "Gungan" after a nonsense sound his son made? What's next, the "googoogagas?"

    9 ** How Wude!

    For a creature so obsessed with the social graces of others, berating them with his "How Wude!" sentiment, Jar Jar sure uncouth himself. Tongues are not for grabbing food.

    10 ** Success through incompetence.

    One of the core values that I hold is that hard work and talent breed success, and incompetence and laziness lead to failure. This isn't really such a novel idea; it should be pretty fundamental to anybody who thinks capitalism is a good thing. It's the basis for the American Dream.

    Young Anakin Skywalker is a good example of these values. Anakin is filled with the force, so he's a great pilot without even trying. In spite of this, he also spends his free time exercising his mechanical skills, trying to search for his slave transmitter, and in general making himself a better person. When Anakin succeeds, we feel he deserves it.

    Jar Jar is a mockery of these values. He's unintelligent, a coward, and lazy. He's mechanically inept. His clumsiness makes him such a burden on his society that they force him into exile. He is careless with military weaponry. He almost breaks the pod-racer by dropping an tool into a jet engine! And in spite of all of this, he succeeds too!

    The idea that Jar Jar can succeed without trying simply because he's good-hearted is offensive to Libertarians everywhere.

    Why did Lucas waver again. He has no integrity. First the video trailer clps showing scenes not in the movie, and now this doublecross of his fans.

  45. Re:/.'ed and blocking referrals by kisielk · · Score: 1

    Your feeble OSX is no match for the power of Slashdot...

    Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to slashdot a website is insignificant next to the power of the Force.

  46. high tech past != low tech future by Meech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course the plot seems generic, there are movies and storylines that they have to follow.

    They never really showed any other sith for the Jedi to fight. I am sure that they created one, but didn't share that information in the trailers. The only part that I found to be bland in the thing was Yoda's dialogue. I never really understood why someone so old and wise couldn't speak elementary english. But I guess you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

    A real problem is that with the high-tech past, how does the future become so mundane in just a generation? They need to do a lot of explaining in the next two movies to show why and how they got from point A to point B, but enough of this off topic rant!

    1. Re:high tech past != low tech future by dpt · · Score: 1


      A real problem is that with the high-tech past, how does the future become so mundane in just a generation?


      Because the evil empire, once it's bought out the government and betrayed the guardians of justice, introduces laws and starts fear campaigns that restrict and retard all innovation.

      Take, for example the backward, harsh technology of a TIE fighter that causes it's pilot to be nothing more than a restricted extension of the will of the Empire. No doubt Vader can shut down any single TIE fighter pilot remotely that infringes the DMCA. Now compare it to that of an X-Wing, which empowers the pilot to go wherever they like, and do whatever they like. And with enough security (shields), life-support systems, computing power (R2 unit) and weaponary to be reasonably independent. The Windows/Unix analogy is clear!

  47. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    Try Independence War. Maybe it doesn't have the nukes, but the universe does have newtonian physics.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  48. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by interiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A massive confrontation like this unfortunately leaves little room for personal interaction. Sure, you might have the last minute Kennedy to Khrushchev calls, but other than that, the plot would involve millions of people being blown up without even knowing the individual who pressed the button. Moviegoers want to watch movies that have some relevance to their life, and interpersonal relationships is one of the more complex and challenging topics for movies to explore.

  49. Another server, other formats by jdavidb · · Score: 3, Informative

    The apple server isn't slashdotted (yet). It just wants a specific referring page, or it wants you to come straight in. Click the link from the article, get the error message, click in your URL window, and hit return again.

    You can also find the trailer at planetmirror. This completes my collection; now I'll have a full CD-ROM full of stuff to keep me excited until the release date.

  50. cut him some slack by abolith · · Score: 1

    personally I don't give a bloody damn what the rest of /. thinks I liked the trailer. just from the looks of it it COULD have the makings of a good movie so long as lucas spent the time between battles to fully develop the characters and story line. his past history works against him HOWEVER he could still come through.
    The only way he could have that much fighting and still "grow" the characters is to have the movie be at least 2 hours(min) long, better would be like 2 1/2 to 3. let us all keep the hope alive.

    And to all you lucas bashers out there GIVE THE MAN A BREAK HE FUBAR'D ONE STINKIN' MOVIE, GIVE HIM A BIT OF A CHANCE WILL YA!

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    1. Re:cut him some slack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a liar. He releases trailers with scenes not in the eventual movies.

      bait and switch is immoral. I will not cut him slack.

      Lucas the swindler needs to learn some integrity and show only film clips actually USED in the final finished edited movies.

    2. Re:cut him some slack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ONE? Howard the Duck, anyone?

    3. Re:cut him some slack by The_THOMAS · · Score: 1

      Come on! As far as sci-fi goes, the Star Wars films are utter tripe! The genre will never get the respect it deserves until audiences demand quality! Lucas ain't quality and never has been.

      --
      Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  51. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by drzhivago · · Score: 1

    That would be anticlimatic. With insanely powerful weapons comes instant destruction. What fun is there in that? Worringly powerful weapons only brings about detante. Haven't you seen that already in the past 50 years? A believable universe won't make a more interesting film.

    Sure some of your suggestions are cool, and a couple have already been done. Not in the A++ title or the one thats got the big budget, but they are out there.

    Greg

  52. No Doubt! by The_THOMAS · · Score: 1

    Truly trying to make up for lack of action in past trailers!

    --
    Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  53. He wasn't worried about the romance plot by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think Lucas was focusing on the action to downplay romance.

    If you look at the Episode 1 trailers, and look at how Lucas does things, you'll see he likes to create a different effect with each trailer. The other trailer was a "love story" trailer, this one is an action trailer. I would not be surprised if there are one or two more that each emphasize a different theme or plot.

  54. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feel free to raise the $200 million to make your movie, and make it yourself. Of course your movie will flop because most intelligent human beings would rather watch a movie where people talk to one another rather than to instantly vapourize them.

  55. Uh.... by scaramush · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does the lead guy (Hayden Christensen) look like one of the backstreet boys?

    No wonder they nixed letting the boys be in the movie...Everyone would have confused them with the lead, and it'd have been a really big mess...

    --
    "...you can steal my woman, but you ain't done nuthin' smart."
    1. Re:Uh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... hes from N'sync. *snicker.

      The only way I am watching this movie is if I get a writen guarantee that at some point in EP3 Vader is knee deep in human blood ala Snow Crash.

      Also... WHY DIDN'T VADER AND CP30 RECOGNIZE EACH OTHER IN EMPIRE?

  56. Among other things.... by cyberon22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The pod race is a visual allusion to the chariot race in Ben Hur. Ben hur, for those who haven't seen it, is the story of a man who turns to violence to avenge his mother and sister, and finds redemption through the love of Christ.

    Agree with the "too much CGI" comment though.

    1. Re:Among other things.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... it's got a lot more in common with films like "Grand Prix" than Ben Hur. Remember Lucas was a bit of racer in his youth.

  57. Still doesn't work by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    I put them in /usr/lib/win32 like it said, and I get no video.

    Anybody know what this means?

    ------------------
    Successfully opened ep2_clone_war_p640.avi
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/ libwin32.so: found A: 13 V: 46 plugins
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libmpeg_audiode c.so: found A: 1 V: 0 plugin
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libmp3lame_audio enc.so: found A: 1 V: 0 plugin
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libmjpeg.so: found A: 0 V: 1 plugin
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libmad_audiodec. so: found A: 1 V: 0 plugin
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libffmpeg.so: found A: 2 V: 5 plugins
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libaudiodec.so: found A: 5 V: 0 plugins
    /usr/local/lib/avifile0.6/libac3pass.so: found A: 1 V: 0 plugin
    CreateVideoDecoder(): Unknown codec 0x30355844 = "DX50"
    IAviPlayer: FATAL: Failed to initialize decoder object
    No video will be available
    ----------------

    1. Re:Still doesn't work by seann · · Score: 0, Troll

      it means it does not understand the Divx 5.0 codec.
      I sugest you search google.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Still doesn't work by salmo · · Score: 1

      Normally I don't respond to things like this, but this time I had to...

      Funny you mention media players, Windows XP, and secure in the same comment. I guess you call it secure when Windows Media PlayerXP phones home to MS to tell you what you're watching. Either that or you don't read Bugtraq. Nothing against XP, never used it, and I might not ever just 'cause I've never had the need to.

      Also, I think any OS is probably as real as the next, unless its vaporware. Unfortunately DOS was all too real.

    3. Re:Still doesn't work by ywwg · · Score: 1

      on the avifile download page there's a link to "divx4linux" with the version 5 codec. Grab that and recompile. I haven't tried it myself but I am now.

    4. Re:Still doesn't work by KlomDark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh yeah, that's real helpful you asshole. Fuck off.

    5. Re:Still doesn't work by RicoX9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are annoyed by someone who needs help, STFU. Posting crap like this is totally unproductive and fosters ill-will.

  58. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by halo8 · · Score: 1

    WTF? when i first replied to this comment (see the game comment i made) it was +4 insightfull.. now its 2 Troll. how dose that work?

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  59. singular craft : mass production by jcsehak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the extras in ep. I, Lucas was saying he wanted the look and feel of the first episodes vs. the next 3 to mirror the product evolution of the US before and after the industrial revolution. So on one hand, you have machines that are hand-made by craftsmen, then everything gets industrialized and you get the more mass-produced look of eps. 4-6.

    Personally, I think it's a neat idea, but I agree with you--he didn't think it all the way through and it looks wierd. How come the technology in the ep. 1 is no less advanced, if not more advanced? Maybe what he should've done is make eps. 1-3 with the exact same moviemaking technology that he used in the 70's, except when he needed a shot that was impossible to do without CG, he should've done some CGI, except make it look like animatronics or puppets, rather than real life. For some reason, I find it a lot easier to suspend my disbelief in eps. 4-6, even though the effects in ep. 1 supposedly look more realistic.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:singular craft : mass production by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      I always took it as the huge war caused a "dark age".

  60. Re:/.'ed and blocking referrals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just one little thing, that url, "http://applesw.download.akamai.com/ep2/clone_war/ index.html", is not Apple's server. It's an Akamai mirror, running Linux.

    ...Not that heavy load was the problem in the first place. They're denying external referrals.. on purpose of all things.

  61. Far too yellow by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    definitely too much yellow. always a bad sign...

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  62. Apple is on to our game by sllort · · Score: 0, Interesting

    my old trick for getting around Apple's lame referrer check for "Quicktime Pro" has failed:

    wget -U "QuickTime (qtver=5.0.2;os=Windows NT 5.1)" http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/640/ clone_war_ctp_ap640.mov

    anybody else had any luck?

    1. Re:Apple is on to our game by Anonynnous+Coward · · Score: 1

      That's nice--it grabs the 70K stub. Now how does one capture the whole trailer?

    2. Re:Apple is on to our game by Strog · · Score: 1

      The file you are looking for is ep2_clone_war_p640.mov. What you downloaded is the stupid click here movie.

    3. Re:Apple is on to our game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name is right but the real file is coming off an akami address and not an apple.com one.

    4. Re:Apple is on to our game by leozh · · Score: 1
      I GOT IT! :D
      wget -U "QuickTime (qtver=5.0.2;os=Windows NT 5.1)" http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/gate /ep2_clone_war_p640.mov
      --
      __________________
      Leo
      webmaster@007sdomain.com
    5. Re:Apple is on to our game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice one, man.

      -s.

  63. Uh -oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or did the desert battle scenes remind you of (God save us) Wild, Wild West?

    Try replaying the video with the sound turned down and Will Smith's theme music in the background.

  64. More mirrors for all trailers by sahrss · · Score: 1

    http://www.movie-list.com/s/starwars2.shtml

  65. Realism plug-in by jcsehak · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think part of the problem is that with CGI, they don't have the limitations of real life, so they just forget about them. "Hey, let's make the camera fly around the race course at a million mph. Ooo, cool." "Okay, while you do that, I'm going to make my CG character figit around annoyingly while the real actors are talking just because I've got a handle on Inverse Kinematics." WTF? Real life actors can sit still, why can't CG ones?

    I think someone needs to come up with a plug-in for Softimage (or whatever program they use) that will prevent the virtual camera from doing anything a normal camera couldn't do in real life. Like if you moved it too high, it would make you build a virtual crane to hold it in position. Or if you moved it around in the air, you'd get a $3,000 virtual helicopter rental fee deducted from your bank account.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Realism plug-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have any mod points, but I'm laughing my ass off.

    2. Re:Realism plug-in by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Real life actors can sit still, why can't CG ones?

      because CG character programers don't study acting. something thats going to have to change.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Realism plug-in by the_tallman · · Score: 1
      Acutally, a good camera animator will build a rig in Softimage to simulate a real camera rig. There are a group of animators who subscribe to the philosophy that you should never key the camera directly; only key its rigged constraints.

      On a side note, I find it interesting that the digital world is trying to animate virtual cameras to simulate reality and the real world camera operators try to simulate digital camera moves such as scene in "The Matrix".

      - Ivan

      --
      There is no graceful way to eat an egg salad sandwich.
    4. Re:Realism plug-in by jimbolaya · · Score: 1
      For what ever reason, that reminds me of something that truly bothers me about some video games (including Pod Racer *): Lens flares. To me, a video game should make us feel like we are there, not like we are watching a film of somebody else who was there. And, in my experience, the lens of the human eye does not generate lens flares. If lens flares are added to video games to make them seem more realistic, they have actually done the opposite.

      * See, I'm not entirely off topic!

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    5. Re:Realism plug-in by jcsehak · · Score: 1

      No no, it's simple logic:

      1. All video game players are geeks.
      2. All geeks wear glasses.
      3. Glasses create lens flares.
      4. Therefore, video games should have lens flares!

      Yeah, I agree. Lens flares are way overused, even in films. Sometimes it almost gets as cheesy as the glint of sparkle on a tooth or brand new car.*

      *Now it's entirely off topic :)

      --

      c-hack.com |
    6. Re:Realism plug-in by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Actually AFAIK real live people aren't very still even when sitting or standing "still". Most people don't or can't behave like statues.

      And I believe most people are good at spotting that either consciously or subconsciously.

      Maybe some CGI animators overdo the "stationary" pose, hence the "fidgetty" complaint.

      Cheerio,
      Link.

      --
  66. Quicktime 6 is not even out yet by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    First if all, QuickTime 6 is not even out yet. Second, Apple could care less about DRM. As a matter of fact they are pushing open standards and the ability to use media as you see fit. Unlike Microsoft.
    Br>
    Hell, look at the iPod and iTunes. Apple dished those out with a sticker that says "be good" ... otherwise... pirate away ;).

    Fuuuurthermore. Quicktime 6 is not going to be very different from QuickTime 5. It is basically the same player with support for things like MPEG 4, Flash 5, etc.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  67. direct link to trailer by kopper187 · · Score: 1
  68. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. How many businesses do you know that take input from the lower ranks do help in the higher ranks decisions? (I mean significantly, not just "oh, yes, we like the doughnuts with the sprinkles for our coffee breaks")

    2. Regardless of any politics, this is Star Wars. If it were any other movie I'd say let your politics rule your decision on whether or not to go. In this case however, it's STAR WARS! sorry, guess i've been lookin forward to this for too long. (and no, i didn't like phantom menace)

  69. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lucas's movies from the 70's are the primary reason (debatably equal with Spielberg's movies) for the "blockbuster-centric" state of the movie industry today. "

    Well, also consider that before they developed the Blockbuster model, Hollywood was going bankrupt. They were so desparate in the early 70s that they tried everything -- even art movies!

    Not that the current output is all that great, but it's probably better than the alternative (TV production taking over, which happened in many other countries).

    As far as feudalism, it sounds as if Lucas has holed himself up with a bunch of worshipping techies that are enamored with his vision and pushing the state of the art up on his 'ranch' in Marin.

    I would say that PM certainly _did_ try to pander to the fanbase (think of all the walk-on appearences of famous characters), but the fact that Lucas didn't have to have his cut approved by a studio certainly showed.

  70. Anakin 2 Vader by XBL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is Anakin going to become Vader in this episode? That would be the best, as the whole next movie we could see him in action. Yet, maybe Anakin is too young...

    BTW, How come Anakin grows up so fast, and the Queen still looks like a teen? Then they fall in love... in the first movie there was a big age difference... it's a little strange. Oh well, just a movie.

    1. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      I think the Queen was supposed to be like 14 in the Episode 1 - Anakin was supposed to be something like 6-8, so in Episode 2 he may be as old as 20, which would make Amidalla something like 26 - which would work.

      Or Lucas could freeze Amidalla in carbonite or slow her aging or speed Anakin's grouth as some Jedi trick or whatever...

      According to Anakin's bio over at starwars.com:

      Over the next decade, the two forged a strong bond. Under Obi-Wan's careful guidance, Anakin became a confident, headstrong 19-year old with an impulsive nature and a flair for adventure.

      So about 10 years have passed, and they're something like 19 and 24. I think. We'll see :)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Account+10 · · Score: 1

      perhaps people from whatever planet amidala is from age slower.

    3. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by MikeyNg · · Score: 2

      Is Anakin going to become Vader in this episode? That would be the best, as the whole next movie we could see him in action. Yet, maybe Anakin is too young...


      Well, from the spoilers that I've seen... uhh... I'll save comment on that. But you can definitely see some of the turning - remarks about his arrogance, the chancellor letting him go and also bringing him under his wing. Good stuff. In fact, Palpatine could easily go down as THE evil mastermind of all time if things work out as I think they will.

      --
      Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
    4. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by volkris · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it looks to be a "slap you in the face here's what's happening" kind of thing instead of the "look back and say oh yeah, why didn't I catch that then" kind of that that I would generally like better.

      Oh well, I guess he feels the need to tone it down a bit.

    5. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by mgblst · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's called makeup... women have it, men don't. What can you do?

    6. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by kristan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed the Vader "heavy breathing" about 3/4s of the way through the trailer, and wondered if that was part of the plot of this episode as well. Or is it just a bit of "foreshadowing"?

      --K

      --
      --- There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    7. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      I dunno if that's in this one or not, but when he does do that in a movie, it has to be a montage sequence of Anakin shopping for masks set to the tune of "Bad to the Bone".

    8. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relativity.

    9. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second ep is called the Attack of the Clones, right? So Anakin was cloned :)

    10. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by geekoid · · Score: 2

      what can you do?
      Dress all in black, and wear a kick ass Helmet that intimidates the hell out of every body.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unless you're a goth faggot of course...

    12. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      BTW, How come Anakin grows up so fast, and the Queen still looks like a teen? Then they fall in love... in the first movie there was a big age difference... it's a little strange. Oh well, just a movie. Yeah. And how come neither can act his or her way out of a wet (imaginary) paper bag?

      --
      **>>BELCH
    13. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

      What it takes to become evil?

      On the first episode we saw a little kid that seemed to come out of the Mickey Mouse club!. I saw him and said "THIS is going to become Vader, No way!"

      And on this trailer we see this arrogance, a young man wiht this feeling of inmortality, that thinks is the best there is, and doesn't follow advice from his elders...

      ...like every young man does.

      So this is the reason he becomes evil? adolescence
      ? No way!

      --


      Kilroy was here!
    14. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by MikeyNg · · Score: 2

      My current theory is that love will turn him evil. Love for his mother and his love for Amidala. That, to me, would be a really good twist on the whole deal. Most people think that love is a good thing and that no bad could come from it, but we all know people who twist "love" to their own means. If Lucas could turn the Anakin-Amidala love thing into the source of Vader's evil, that would be one good triumph.


      You can also see Palpatine beginning to influence young Anakin as well. That is sure to have some effect as Palpatine is about the coolest behind-the-scenes evil influence there is.


      --
      Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
    15. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by ignavus · · Score: 1

      How come Anakin grows up so fast, and the Queen still looks like a teen?

      Time slows down when you travel near the speed of light - so maybe Amidala has been aging more slowly due to frequent business trips around the galaxies.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    16. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Sheepdot · · Score: 2

      No.

      He will not "turn" into Vader in this Episode. You will see a side of Ani, specifically on Tatooine, that will show what is going on, but he won't fully turn.

      Also, I hate to say this, but he very well might not actually "turn" in Ep 3 as well. He will give in to the dark side and kill a certain character in both Ep2 and 3, and take his right place next to the Emporer, but as far as his physical appearance goes, we might just see him get beat by ObiWan.

      Some of us have high hopes that Lucas will show a glimpse of him as Vader in Episode 3 near the end, however.

    17. Re:Anakin 2 Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's called makeup... women have it, men don't. What can you do?

      Clearly you didn't see "Mission to Mars". Gary Sinise wore more eyeliner than any character in this movie, including the aliens.

  71. nice by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    That was some really nice looking fight stuff in the preview. Yoda was so glowy green he looked like he had more life in him and I thought that was cool. I am guessing they placed the trailer between the dork kid show and the dork adult show to hit their target audience... I used to run projection at a theatre and it always bugged me the kinds of trailers they want to put in front of certain shows and all, so I rebelled one day and put on some horrors and dirty previews before all the rated G shows. I got fired, but before I was canned I spliced the reels out of order on a really boring movie. I heard that nobody noticed or said anything for about a week, until one very particular person noticed that a charachter in the movie who had died was alive again. Anyway.. I think its going to be cool seeing Mace Windu fight. He's the guy with the light sabre that says bad mutha *&%#er on it.

  72. i just like to waste people's bandwidth. (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i said n/t. that means no text. please stop reading.

  73. Why? WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Slashdot still posting this junk? After the flop of SW1 it has been clear that the new movies aren't even remotely watchable. If Lucas would have gotten his mind thru with the 3 older ones as well, they would have been alike disasters. Check the ORIGINAL scripts from the Internet in case you don't believe. They are horrible , although the final movies themselves rocked.

  74. Another DiVX 5 mirror and codec link by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 2, Troll

    Here ya go.

    If you don't have the DiVX 5 codec, Get that here.

    Have fun.

    1. Re:Another DiVX 5 mirror and codec link by Slump · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WARNING!!

      This DiVX download link is to the spyware version that includes Gator.

      Even after uninstalling, Gator will still persist.

  75. SW was a long time ago.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When are we going to see films that really capture the true scale of the energy levels we're going to be flinging around?"

    it's very sad to see you not realize the story told in the Star Wars movies took place a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.

  76. What??? No Natalie Portman trolls??? by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    What a dark day this is for Slashdot!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:What??? No Natalie Portman trolls??? by mobets · · Score: 0

      I want a naked and petrified Natalie Portman with hot grits down her pants!

      how's that?

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  77. Jeeeezus... by buster · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of whiners. It's Star Wars for pity's sake, not religion. Well, that's not totally true, but those people need a life anyway.

    The point is, this is just a good time, hang on to your seat, suspend reality for a while, general wahoo film. It won't change your life, it isn't meant to.

    I for one, think it looks like fun. Can't wait! 8)

    Geez. Stupid Whiners.

    1. Re:Jeeeezus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, whining is what people do best on slashdot.

    2. Re:Jeeeezus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY! Quit whining about whiners.

  78. Wake me up when it's out on video ... yawn by bushboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    The first one sucked therefore I have no yearning to see the second one.

    I saw the first on video about 6 months after it came out and it was most likely the worst film I'd seen that year - in fact, I couldn't even watch the whole thing it was so bad.

    Don't fool yourselves - there's nothing special about this latest re-incarnation of Star Wars, it's simply a cash-cow for lucas films.

    CGI - bleh - big deal.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  79. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    Read a book.

    Hollywood isn't ready for that yet. Who knows why, I agree it would be cool, ideal and just all around nice if they did it.

    I recommend the Hyperion series.

  80. PURE GOLD by bief · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but doesn't anyone have the balls to say, "George...that sucks. Come up with a better idea." I mean, sure he made some kick butt films, but that was when he was still hungry. These days everybody that works for him just tells him what he wants to hear! I can picture the production meetings...George walks in, tells everyone his "great ideas," and leaves. Later an artist can be overheard saying, "Right, and then George told me that he wanted Jar Jar's ears to be really floppy. And I told him, 'George you are PURE GOLD!'"

    1. Re:PURE GOLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can get off coddling George because they know he could put a large exploding gerbil in the movie and the box office would still rake in the big bucks... Like Steven King, Star Wars is automatically "must see" these days. King has started releasing books as often as Lucas releases movies... Hmm, coincidence?

    2. Re:PURE GOLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't pay attention to slashdot discussions much, do you? Lucas bashing is practically a team sport here. Apparently, a good portion of the community are accomplished filmmakers with many of the greatest films ever made under their belts, so obviously know what he should do and should not do. Unfortunately, they don't have the balls to say it to his face, or make a better movie.

  81. They're on to you, boss by mstyne · · Score: 1

    Looks like Steve didn't jive on our plot for some free beer.

    Referral Denied
    You don't have permission to access "http://applesw.download.akamai.com/ep2/clone_war/ media/gate/ep2_clone_war_p640.mov" on this server.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    1. Re:They're on to you, boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right click, save as. If you shift click (open in new window) you get the referral denied.

  82. mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    w00t - man, now thats faaast!

  83. Public Relations Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the email addy for Starwars public relations. Give them hell for forcing users to buy Quicktime Pro for $30.

    1. Re:Public Relations Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Idiot! Here's the email!

      mmansur@L90.com

  84. FASA's Battletech. by Jarvo · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you're hankering for the Battletech universe.

    Unfortunately, most of the fighting in that series of books / RPG takes place on land - constant wars the cause of mass-destruction technologies being lost.

    However, it does base everything on sound scientific principles (fusion reactors, wormholes/space folding for inter-stellar travel).

  85. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dunno, msybr it's just me, lucas has done wonders for the movie industry. people still flock to his releases, just like poele flocked to AI because it was a speilburg film. i havent seen AI to date, but hear it's a good move, even with it's downfalls(can i relate that to buddhism's philsoophy of a middle path, or would that be non-31337?) people like him are good because of one reason among many: he employs several thousand people. yes, this may be off-topic but it is very relevant. i worked at a theater for more than 2 years, and watched people get fired for bs reasons because the industry was at a lapse, watched families make a living(if you can call it that) off of the indusry. yeah, maybe lucas can never re-create the legacy he had once created. but he is still helping our economy. i seriously wonder how many people realize that over 80% of ticket costs go to thesimple cost of a copy of film. do you realize that a single copy of most films costs over 100grand? a film by lucas or speilburg can cost in excess of a quarter of a million dollars. a theater, regarless of what movies it is showing is always on the edge of being over budget. they rely on people showing up to buy tickets to pay for the film they have(which is rented, not bought) and to buy concessions(where the bulk of the theater makes money, if any, most of the money at the concession stand makes is spent paying the people who work it, which typically make less that $7 an hour, i worked for 2 and a half years, was one of the best employees below management, and only made it to $5.90 an hour)). yeah, this movie will never live up to the expectations of the start wars elitist fans, but it will still draw money to pay people so that they can make a living. in summary, lucas and speilburg(let alone kubrick, when he was alive) have more than a responsibility to the fans to keep releasing quality movies(and yes, even episode 1 was a quality move, i saw it several dozen times, and when you let go of the legacy and watch the movie for what it is, it was great), they have a responsibility to help the economy keep going, so that we ALL have jobs to go to, and that the people that dont have college degrees because the cant afford them can have jobs, so they can support their children. there's alot more riding on these peoples shoulders than you may think. we all know it will probably never live up to expectations, but think about it, do you really want a 2 year old to starve to death because you wouldnt go see a movie to pay for them to eat for another day? sorry. had to say it. i share alot of you views about these movies, but i still will go and pay to see them within the first few opening weeks, just like many of you will. i havent seen a movie in theaters in over a year, but movies like these are what the industry depends on.

  86. WTF? I looks like Gladiator. by flogger · · Score: 1

    The end of the trailer with the jedi swirling around against.. robots -(blah) looks as if the fight takes place in an arena. WTF? Will Mr. Crowe come out with N-synk in the fight scenes as well?

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:WTF? I looks like Gladiator. by Golantig · · Score: 1

      There is a big fight scene in an arena. With a big monster. Most of the jedi get their ass' kicked.

  87. "Begun has this clone war" stupid by panck · · Score: 1

    I count 5 scenes just in that trailer that were ripped straight out of other movies, not just the original 3 star wars films either.

    1. Bar fight scene: Obi-wan spins around and whips out his light sabre. From the original Star Wars scene: Obi wan whips out the sabre in a bar and chops off some alien's arm.

    2. Anakin jumps out of the air-car: camera follows him falling, while air-cars zoom around us. From The 5th Element: (couple of scenes) Milla Jovovich as Leelu jumps off the building and air-cars zoom around. Also Bruce Weiner makes his cab dive straight down and more zoomage occurs.

    3. Anakin and Amidala on retracting plank: what comes next, the old kiss for luck? From Empire Strikes Back I think: Luke and Leia in the Death Star or something, find themselves on a retracted bridge over an apparently bottomless pit, and Luke shoots a line somehow and they swing to safety (after the kiss).

    4. Amidala on top something: Her hands are shackled and she swings her chain around to fight off some monster, we get a sexy shot of her butt. From Empire (right?): Leia is in chains and slave of Jaba, the battle starts, she uses her chains to kill Jaba, wearing sexy metal clothes.

    Ok so 4 scenes, but still...that's just in the damn trailer. I can't help but feel offended by that. Someone should have really said to Lucas, "George, this scene is just like in Empire" or whatever... Alright whatever, I'm probably going to see it when it comes out, it looks like fun right? As long as there's not Gungans.

    Also, another peeve: The last words of the trailer where Yoda says "Begun, this clone war, has." Yoda would never say that, jeebus. He would have said "Begun has this clone war." Fer chrissakes Lucas, you created the character, what the hell were you thinking..

    The whole thing makes me think of Iain M. Banks, whose book "Consider Phlebas" came from his response to the original Star Wars: "I can write a better sci-fi movie than that shiat!" (ok paraphrased).

    --
    "What thou shalt not, I shalt did!" -Bart Simpson
    1. Re:"Begun has this clone war" stupid by panck · · Score: 1

      Banks would probably have said "shite" I guess.

      --
      "What thou shalt not, I shalt did!" -Bart Simpson
    2. Re:"Begun has this clone war" stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. Anakin and Amidala on retracting plank: what comes next, the old kiss for luck? From Empire Strikes Back I think: Luke and Leia in the Death Star or something, find themselves on a retracted bridge over an apparently bottomless pit, and Luke shoots a line somehow and they swing to safety (after the kiss).

      There was no kiss, and it was the original.

    3. Re:"Begun has this clone war" stupid by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick but 3) Original Star Wars, A New Hope, and 4) Return of the Jedi. Not sure how you can confuse those into thinking they're both from Empire...

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  88. Where was the infamous "Yoda" scene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before this was released EVERYONE who had seen it via a sneak peak raved about where Yoda catched some sort of blue lighting in his hand that someone shot at him and gets angry and throws it back... I didn't see this anywhere in the trailer? Does anyone have it?

  89. I cannot enjoy this movie.... by rob-fu · · Score: 1

    simply because Jimmy Smits is in it. Yes, Jimmy Smits. You can't take this movie seriously.

  90. Holonetnews.com by tonywong · · Score: 1

    Mentioned at the end of the trailer. Whois reports owned by Lucasfilm. Lots of background stuff into ep. 2. Check it out.

  91. Attack of the Corn by r3v0ltn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it me, or does Yoda say "Begun, this corn war has"? Listen carefully at 2:10.

    1. Re:Attack of the Corn by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one that heard that. I had to think about it for a moment before it made sense.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  92. MPEG trailer mirror (26 MB) here by ciurana · · Score: 5, Informative

    Greetings!

    You may download the trailer from: http://lavender.cime.net/~aotc/ep2_clone_war.mpg

    I got it from Drestin (thanks, Dude!)

    Cheers,

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  93. come on, it is Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which means it won't be that great.

    Let me say what I mean though, which is:

    George Lucas is a great writer
    George Lucas is a terrible director.

    Look back at the original 3. Compare and Contrast the first with the last of those two. Thankfully Lucas only wrote the last two and did not direct them. Not he is back at directing. The movies aren't terrible, because he is a good writer, but I really wish he would let someone else direct.

  94. Old music? Old news. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

    It's common film-industry practice when making trailers to take music from some other source to score the trailer. This is because at the point when most trailers are made, the scoring of the actual film has not yet been completed (or in some cases even begun), so they don't yet have anything to work with.

    In most cases, the music is entirely unrelated, except in mood. For instance, Carmina Burana's "O Fortuna" is a favorite for trailers involving a lot of action (such as the one for Cutthroat Island); so well-known is it that Williams borrowed heavily from it for "Duel of the Fates" in Episode One.

    But in movies that are part of a series, then naturally they'll use music from earlier in the series. Better to have the music be familiar and evocative than for it just to be evocative.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  95. Quicktime Pro required? Apple Suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would somebody care to explain why an upgrade to Quicktime Pro is required to watch a piece of video? I mean - I'd LIKE to think that Apple were not trying to make a fast buck out of the desire to watch the latest SW trailer, but ..erm.. I really dont see why else it might be?

    Apple, you suck. Your computers suck, your attitide sucks. You are greedy. If you were not greedy, you would have ruled the desktop market by now, so who's laughing now? HAR HAR HAR. Losers.

  96. Why do this clowns at Apple.. by Axe · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...insist that one need "PRO" version of the QuickTime to watch big version? I just opened this URL http://starwars.apple.com/ep2/clone_war/media/gate /ep2_clone_war_p640.mov in regular QUickTIme player and got nice, full screen trailer - not some smallish window they force you to see on the web page. And even on the web page this bullshit about getting a paid Pro version. What a bunch of crap.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  97. I know someone already said this, but... by dswensen · · Score: 2, Troll

    Pick up a book. I'm not trying to be snide; I think you're going to find much more of the kind of inventiveness you're looking for in sci-fi novels than you ever will in the movies.

    WWII-era space battles and balkanized aliens are just too much of a staple. Farscape has some slightly more interesting aliens, in that they're not all humanoid, but they still adhere to more or less cartoony personality types.

    I think it's just a limitation of the television / movie medium. Well, not of the medium, but of the economic circumstances driving the medium.

    1. Re:I know someone already said this, but... by Fweeky · · Score: 2

      > Pick up a book. I'm not trying to be snide; I
      > think you're going to find much more of the kind
      > of inventiveness you're looking for in sci-fi
      > novels than you ever will in the movies.

      What, you think I got all those ideas without reading? :)

      As well as The Reality Dysfunction (+The Neutronium Alchemist and The Naked God), I can also heartily recommend Eon (+Eternity and Legacy) and Queen of Angels (+Slant and Moving Mars).

      > I think it's just a limitation of the
      > television / movie medium. Well, not of the
      > medium, but of the economic circumstances
      > driving the medium.

      It's the same with games; same old FPS' with slightly nicer graphics and a different cheesy storyline, or RTS clones, or, um.. er..

      I suppose the best we can hope for is an evolution, where the industries try similar concepts in different ways and move slowly between different ones. As we get richer, maybe we'll see more turnover and them being a bit more prepared to try new things.

    2. Re:I know someone already said this, but... by dswensen · · Score: 2

      What, you think I got all those ideas without reading? :)

      Yeah, my apologies. I should have considered that. :)

      As well as The Reality Dysfunction (+The Neutronium Alchemist and The Naked God), I can also heartily recommend Eon (+Eternity and Legacy) and Queen of Angels (+Slant and Moving Mars).

      Thanks! I haven't actually heard of any of those. I will put them on the reading list.

      And I wish movies were a little more cerebral / epic sometimes too, especially in the sci-fi genre, but nothing much has changed but the technology in the past twenty-five years or so. I'm not too confident it's going to.

  98. Easy Solution by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2

    Click on your URL field, and hit enter. No more referral header, no more refusal of service.

    Apple apparently fights the slashdot effect, but resistance is futile ;P.
    BlackGriffen

  99. (mozilla tabs rule) Re:Link not active?!! by cannonball_D · · Score: 1

    Mozilla preferences allow me to use my middle mouse button such that when I click a link with it, it opens in a new tabbed window -- not only does this resolve the issues with direct hyperlinking via /., but its easily the most satisfying feature of the browswer itself (well, that and my crossover plugin).

    1. Re:(mozilla tabs rule) Re:Link not active?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh that's cool, too bad you can't do that in IE too...

      Oh wait, you can! And you've been able to do that for years... what a great Mozilla retro-innovation!

    2. Re:(mozilla tabs rule) Re:Link not active?!! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      How do you do it with IE? don't tell me shift click. I want to be able to do it with my middle mouse button.

  100. Refused?!?! by Beaker00 · · Score: 1

    Rejected by women first, and now Star wars is rejecting me. What can we nerds turn to next...

  101. In one big go? by Axe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dare I say: Boob job? In one big go..:)

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  102. I know this is to be expected but... by Sorcerer13 · · Score: 1

    was it just me or did Natalie Portman look smoking hot in this new trailer? I've never found her very attractive, but in this trailer, I mean damn. ;)

  103. C3PO by srichman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Jar Jar is a mockery of these values. He's unintelligent, a coward, and lazy. He's mechanically inept. His clumsiness makes him such a burden on his society that they force him into exile. He is careless with military weaponry. He almost breaks the pod-racer by dropping an tool into a jet engine! And in spite of all of this, he succeeds too!
    Jar Jar is the new (well, old) C3PO. Reread your description and tell me this isn't the bumbling, slightly annoying role that Lucas was trying to recreate.
    1. Re:C3PO by clintp · · Score: 1

      Correct, but you didn't go far enough. Jar Jar is the new Ewoks or Droids depending on the movie. Lucas' mythos always has in it a character that's essentially ignorant to the ways of the world and that the Force protects and uses to its own devices.

      If those characters were smarter, they'd be immune to the blessings of Dumb Luck or they'd try to manipulate it for their own purposes.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    2. Re:C3PO by bdow · · Score: 1

      Threepio didn't get a battle droid stuck to his foot, wave it around, and blow up three others completely by accident. He found a stormtrooper and got shot into little bitty bits.
      And in response to another post, the ewoks didn't accidentally fly into the hangar of a massive battleship, accidentally fire the torpedos, and set off a remarkably large chain reaction destroying the whole thing. They used a number of clever, if low-tech traps and gadgets to fight the much better-equipped stormtroopers... and some of them paid the price. They fought and died, not surrendered to an army with orders to kill them and get taken prisoner anyway (did anyone ever figure that one out?)
      Ok, I'm done ranting now. I just hope the next two movies mature into something targetted to the teen-and-older audience instead of all the "my son would think this is so great" stuff...

    3. Re:C3PO by (void*) · · Score: 2

      But it is poor recreation. C3PO wasn't incompetent or stupid, just endlessly whiny and self-absorbed. I see in C3PO, some of that character of Marvin the paranoid android. He is a sympathetic character. Jar-Jar Binks just has no redeeming values.

  104. Re: Archetypes/Creativity by Arsewiper · · Score: 1
    Slightly off-topic perhaps but may be of interest. I have had a number visions where I experience archetypal locations and events such a temple (spirit) and underworld (subconscious - various levels). I relate very well to things I see or read that evoke these in me. The column filled chamber in LOTR is almost identical to my vision of a dungeon where my repressed lust resides. Seeing it (I gave up on the book years ago) gave me a strong sense that Tolkein was describing his own inner landscapes. Lucas is not doing this, he may have to begin with but now he's dealing from the mind ("what will look good?" Instead of "what comes from my subconscous is true to me"). I find this a purer form of creativity.

    If you want to explore your own inner landscape read Inner Guide Meditation by Steinbrecher(sp?)and have yourself a load of visions. Enjoy. Maybe I'll send a copy to Lucas.

  105. CGI? by Big+Dogs+Cock · · Score: 1

    They should be using servlets.

    --
    "Under the iron bridge, we fist" - The Smiths, Still Ill
  106. Re:Summary of Posts and finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obligatory

    how about a beowulf cluster of these??

    Now it is complete

  107. characters by raelitycheckbounced · · Score: 0
    Is it just me or has Lucas forgotten that the first trilogy relied heavily on characters like Solo, who contrasted with Skywalker in an amusing way?

    It seems as though the characters in ep 1 lack the personality seen in the first three movies. In a new hope, we had an idealistc farm boy, a rogue with a heart of gold and a princess thrown together in an epic adventure. This was far more entertaining than watching a couple of boring pious jedi and a poor attempt at comic relief going through the motions of the plot, without the characters having any real vitality

    IMHO for episode 2 to be its best, Lucas needs to inject life into the movie by making the characters more than just people dragging along a plotline

  108. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many cool things about it but the coolest thing is the absence of Jar Jar.

    1. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look carefully at the scene where the Jedi are listening to somw holographic chap...

  109. Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am afraid it is you who are mistaken about many things...

    What a geek!

    1. Re:Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it woulda been better geek-fodder if he'd gotten the quote right: "I'm afraid it is you who are mistaken... about a great many things"

  110. Now that I've seen it... by Golantig · · Score: 1

    ...think I'll point out some of the things I like about the trailer.

    The whole look is a hybrid between Episode I and the original trilogy. I particularly like the way they have aged Palpatine - McDiarmid subtly adding the lower lip quiver we associate with the Emperor.

    The 1st generation star-destroyer like things, and the ATATs (without heads). Yes, everything is turning grey and Empire like.

    Yoda's little floating platform - awesome. Flying R2, it's cheesy - but go little guy!

    The clones look fantastic. Notice the squadron leader with the red markings on his helmet.

    Christopher Lee.

    One lightsaber in each hand - maybe in film three we'll see a dual lightsaber in each hand...

    Things I don't like:

    Those monkeys with wings from 'Return to Oz'.

    Dodgey London accents from the clone guy and the blue-horn guy.

    CG Yoda is, well, CG. Nuff said.

    Samuel L really is hopeless.

    For those of you pointing out all the similarities between the original trilogy, er, hello? You're missing the point completely.

    1. Re:Now that I've seen it... by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

      I won't take exception to anything you said except about the accents. Temura (sp?) Morrison (Jango)is from New Zealand and that it his actual accent.

    2. Re:Now that I've seen it... by Golantig · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're right, he is a kiwi isn't he! ;o)

  111. Didn't see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the hot grits?

    1. Re:Didn't see it by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      In the pants, where grits belong.

      --
      **>>BELCH
  112. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by fruey · · Score: 1

    I think Lucas, in general, is doing what he can with Star Wars. He wants to make the story into movies, he is now going backwards.... doing the older part of the plot after everyone already has built their own past for all the characters and probably even role-played parts of it.

    He's bound to get flamed even if the new films are cooooool.

    But in general, I think his development is really a fluke, a movie that took off and even today, ask yourself this question: did I say that the movie Phantom Menace sucked? And how many times did I watch it?

    Rarely do I view movies twice. In spite of my apprehensions and all, I still ended up watching Phantom Menace three times. I haven't watched any other movies that many times!

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  113. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by TeaDaemon · · Score: 1

    It could be coming. I heard a rumour (don't ask me where, I can't remember) that somebody had got hold of the film rights for E.E. 'Doc' Smith's Lensman series.

    Seven books of epic space combat on the same sort of scale or larger (planet sized balls of antimatter enough for you?) If it gets anywhere it should be worth a look, the books are way cool if a little dated these days.

  114. GalaxyQuest and the "Crushers" by invenustus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, in the new trailer that aired last night after Malcolm, right after Yoda says "In grave danger you are", there's something I can't believe. You see Obi-Wan jumping through some kind of press that's trying to crush him vertically. Didn't Lucas see GalaxyQuest?! As Sigourney Weaver would say, "This episode was badly written!"

    --
    grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
  115. Go to a chick flick, pussy by Qwaniton · · Score: 1

    You obviously have never seen a Star Wars movie, nor do you know what you want out of it. Star Wars is science fiction. Star Wars is space opera. Star Wars is not a chick flick starring Ben Affleck, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, or any of those pussyboys. If that's what you want, go watch the historically inaccurate Pearl Harbor. If you're a real nerd, you would know we don't care about interpersonal relationships in Star Wars, and that we don't want to see it. Go worship Jar Jar and DUAAFAFO! (Do us all a favor and f**k off!)

    1. Re:Go to a chick flick, pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as long as we get our shiny machines and explosions we're happy, aren't we.

  116. wah by vorhese · · Score: 1

    bitch bitch bitch If you think the movie is going to suck, don't go you bunch of zombies. It's as easy as that. I think the movie looks fun.

  117. Now you have to turn off referrer logging. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    They now block referrer Slashdot, so:

    1. Turn off referrer logging if you have Opera.

    2. If you don't use Opera but do use Proxomitron, use that to turn off referrer.

    3. If neither of the above is an option for you, cut the link and paste it into a new instance of your browser.

    Happy hunting!

    1. Re:Now you have to turn off referrer logging. by Ryu2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      They are blocking ALL non Apple, non Lucas HTTP referrals, it seems, not just Slashdot. I tried linking from my own personal page, and it failed.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:Now you have to turn off referrer logging. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      They are blocking ALL non Apple, non Lucas HTTP referrals, it seems, not just Slashdot. I tried linking from my own personal page, and it failed.

      That's why I said to turn off referrer logging in the broswer or through a third-party app. like Proxomitron. Just checked. It works fine.

  118. re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by Martin+S. · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Watching EP1 last night on the Movie channel I had a rather interesting insight. That Anakin is/was always the second Sith [candidate].

    Anakin 'imaculate conception', hint's of genetic engineer, aka The Clone-Wars.

    Palpatine familiarity with Tatooine, 'a minor outland planet on the edge of known space', he clearly knows about it, Why ? He Certainly he has some interest in it!

    Tatooine close proximatly to Naboo, Palpatine home planet. Convenient or Coincidence ?

    Qui-Gon Jinn believed Anakin to be the Chosen One spoken of in an ancient prophecy, the one who would bring balance to the Force. What does he know to suggest he is not a natural produced/wild Jedi? And Why is training Anakin, the most important thing/ last wish he asked of Obi-Wan ?

    Anakin's unatural talent for machines, when Jedi are supposed to be connected to living things.

    Anakin 'training' on Tatooine.

    Bobafetts links to Tatooine, and Palpatine and Sith's.

  119. We USED to be able to download it online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...until the link was posted to Slashdot...

  120. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Fweeky · · Score: 3

    > A massive confrontation like this unfortunately leaves little room for personal interaction.

    Nope; you're not going to make a film entirely out of that, there's plenty of room for getting across the raw panic/cold determinism/etc of the people involved, then you've got space for setting up these huge battles, all the politics and interpersonal relationships that caused them etc, then the after effects as people risk their lives to save survivors. And of course, you've got the more mundane aspects of the lives of the main characters.

    Really, you're not going to make a movie entirely out of that sort of large scale battle; they're probably not going to last long anyway (how long do you think anyone would survive these sort of battles without either being vaporised, running out of ammo, overheating or deciding to run away?), and nobody's going to go about nuking planets/space stations/each other without good reason. You might as well say the same about any movie; sure, done badly it'll end up being a special effects showcase and nothing else, but hey, it's not going to be any worse than what we already have, is it?

  121. star wars is for fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    star wars is for fags. the newer ones anyways. learn to let go people.

  122. Lucas *did* write the script for ROTJ by Scryber · · Score: 1

    He co-wrote it with Lawrence Kasdan (who had finished the ESB script after Leigh Brackett died).

    So that's why it "looks more like a Lucas movie."
    (i.e., why is sucked).

  123. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    > With insanely powerful weapons comes instant destruction.

    Not really; with insanely powerful weapons comes equally powerful defense; launch a volly of missiles at someone, they launch a bunch back, fire a beam of radiation at someone, they fire a cloud of reflective chaff back and disapate the heat (or hiding behind the huge cloud of radiation your missiles (and by missiles, think: semi-intelligent minature warships with submunitions, big, dirty drive systems that cloud everything etc)).

    Soldiers get smart "skins" which solidify and conduct excess heat into the ground, meaning it takes nothing short of a direct hit to kill them (not to mention the boosted bodies which are more capable of taking damage).

    It doesn't always become more instant (even when it does, nobody's going to want to fry ground forces from orbit, just like nobody now wants (or can arrange) to start throwing nukes around), since both sides won't be standing still.

  124. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Fweeky · · Score: 1

    Not sure how it got to +4, +3 is the best I count (maybe you have a +1 modifier on Insightful comments?) but since you asked:

    "Insightful" (+1)

    "Troll" (-1)

    "Interesting" (+1)

    "Flamebait" (-1)

    "Interesting" (+1)

    "Overrated" (-1)

    This is why we have metamoderation :)

  125. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    > Read a book.

    > Hollywood isn't ready for that yet.

    Well, it is still fairly "early"; who knows what will happen in the next few years/decades/centuries.

    > I recommend the Hyperion series.

    The Reality Dysfunction series is rather good too. Peter Hamilton++;

  126. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by edremy · · Score: 2

    A couple of book suggestions. Movies just ain't gonna cut it here.

    • Most anything by Iain Banks in the Culture series. Big, honking ships that can waste star systems in milliseconds. (Ob Quote from memory "It looks like a dildo" "That's appropriate: armed, it can fuck star systems.) Excession has a good number of battle scenes.
    • Simmons' Hyperion series, if nothing else for the battle scene at the end between Kassad and the Shrike.
    • The Tides of God, for the target of the misson if for no other reason.
    • Ship of Fools. No real battle scenes, but the best aliens I've seen in a while.


    Eric
    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  127. Attack of the pre-troopers? by BrynM · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the line of Fett clones look a bit like storm troopers? Is this the first generation of troopers?

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Attack of the pre-troopers? by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression (from the various Star Wars novels...don't know if they're canon or not) that post-Clone Wars Imperial Stormtroopers were all in fact clones. Correct me if I'm wrong?

    2. Re:Attack of the pre-troopers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks as if this will turn out to be the case. Although it would be strange if the clones are literally clones of Fett. This also tends to fit in with Lucas's revisions to Episode I (to further "whitewash" the good guys).

      What it does not explain is why Stormtroppers have different heights and different voices. ps. did Lucas edit out that part in Star Wars ("A New Hope") where the Stormtrooper hits his helmet on a doorway?

  128. Copycat scene from _The Fifth Element_? by bjk4 · · Score: 2

    Has anyone noticed how the scene where Anakin jumps off the levitating car is eirily similar to a scene from The Fifth Element?

    -B

  129. Re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by osgeek · · Score: 2

    I think that you're putting far more thought into the subplots of the Star Wars universe than George Lucas does.

    Personally, I think that he has a dart board that has his various plot elements, then he just strings them haphazzardly together.

  130. more sith to fight? by bdow · · Score: 1

    Hm... I wonder who they could possibly use as another Sith villain to kill, after the popularity of Darth Maul... what was the name of this movie again?

  131. Oh wow! by xZAQx · · Score: 0, Troll

    Does it include the new *nSync song on the trailer!? Does (insert some nsync guy's name here) have a new haircut!?
    Ooh ooh, I gotta get my hands on that sexy sell-out flavah!

    Star Wars 1,2,3 Good stuff.
    It's all downhill from here; geeks and 14 yr old boy bands don't mix.

    I have spoken blashpheme against ye geekdom; mod me as troll.

    Blah.
    Lucas is a whore.
    Die.

    --

    We dance to all the wrong songs.
    --Refused.
  132. Score -2: WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not required. It's only required to bypass the stupid "click-to-play" screens, but if you pay attention to the request it sends out you can directly download the actual movie file and play it in an unregistered quicktime.

    Either you're not smart enough to figure this out on your own, or you're intentionally spreading falsehoods. Either way, stop it.

  133. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Honor Harrington by David Weber

  134. OH NO!!! by SteamedGeek · · Score: 0

    His father he is, but face him he will!!! Die rebel scum...

    --
    Life Sucks... Have a Beer and a Smoke then Smile Damnit!!!
  135. Is this when the natalie portman.... by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

    jokes start all over again????

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
  136. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by SteamedGeek · · Score: 0

    Try the Sten series for some seriously fun, yet light james bond like sci-fi with the baddest space battles imaginable, especially towards the end of the seris. It's fun and at the same type has several condemations of man, all wrapped up in epic sci-fi style and giant battles. Cool stuff, just take it with a grain. Honor Harrington is good stuff too, so are the Man-Kzin Wars, and for ground warfare David Drake puts out some interesting stuff (BOLOs Rule!)

    --
    Life Sucks... Have a Beer and a Smoke then Smile Damnit!!!
  137. Bad Movie, Cool Scene by SteamedGeek · · Score: 0

    Wing Commander... the light carrier moving into battle against the Cats heavy CR and two DD's. The ship to ship fighting was interesting, though I would picture more missles in each volley. When they closed to 'broadside range', it was interesting also. Bab 5 has some of these elements too. But ultimately, no movie has yet tackled massive emperial warfare between empires having thousands of planets and trillions of citizens, massive fleets with captial ships on the scale of the Executioner (and lots of them). The Wingman books capture this somewhat, in WWII hero fashion, as do the Sten and Lensman books. I have always dreamed of a 4X game that focuses on massive empires with massive multiple fleets and legion sized ground units hurling anti-matter energy at each other from long and close range, fighters slashing in to nip away while fast escorts in the van duke it out with hunter killer torpedos the size of small fighters. Won't happen though... the graphics for computer games won't deal with the poly and this won't get made until they can release it as a game. FreeSpace 2 is somewhat close...

    --
    Life Sucks... Have a Beer and a Smoke then Smile Damnit!!!
  138. Only to see the trailer by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

    I remember this happening for the first trailer. Anybody heard of people who plan to buy tickets to Ice Age just to see the trailer on the big screen, and then walk out? I forget what the movie for the first trailer was, but I heard stories of people who paid admission price just to see the trailer. Ah well, perhaps it was because it was the *first* trailer for the first new movie...

    --
    "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    1. Re:Only to see the trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was wing commander... thank your lucky stars if you can't remember it.

  139. two words: Blue Screen by Scryber · · Score: 1

    It's painfully obvious that in every other scene the actors are standing in front of a blue screen. The office/council rooms and bridge/walkways all look CG. It looks fake.

    Compare that to the sets of pre-CG SF movies (including the original SW trilogy). They were sometimes rather crude but you knew everything you were seeing was real. The props, the walls, the decor--it was all tangible, hard matter that despite being "fake" (i.e. gadgets that don't exist in our universe), looked real. Not to say the CG stuff isn't created with the same attention to detail, but it calls attention to itself. In the back of your mind you're thinking, "That looks just a little off." Which is enough to jar some viewers out of that engrossed state where they forget they are watching a movie.

    Unfortunately Lucas is so enamored with all things digital that he appears to want to shoot scenes with a blue screen even if it isn't really necessary. It might be overlooked if the script and acting were up to par, but based on what we've seen so far, it won't be.

    1. Re:two words: Blue Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt the same way watching Babylon 5.

  140. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by geekoid · · Score: 2

    In a universe that fast FTL, planet destruction is pice of cake.
    1. take ship with FTL.
    2. Fly ship at light speed into planet.
    3. watch atmosphere explode.

    Just for reference, I pieces of material(less thena kilo gram), tracelling at about 100th the speed of light, leveled a 10 mile radius.
    who needs a death star?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  141. A note on Jedi fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > - Lucas's narratives tend to reflect a rather benevolently
    > feudal/fascist view of the world, in which an elite group (Jedi) rules
    > over/provides protection to the general classes; he has furthermore
    > stated his preference for "benevolent dictator" style organization for
    > his businesses (Lucasfilm/ILM/etc.), as well as indicating that his
    > films are very specifically his own (versus "for the fans")... this
    > idealized feudalism is further reflected in his deity-like
    > relationship with his (legions of) fans. i.e. Lucas' s "independent"
    > streak is very much a part of a tendency towards complete control over
    > his work.

    I don't know much about Lucas' managerial style, but the Jedi are, of course, based on the fascist Samurai caste of feudal Japan. Star Wars was (by Lucas' admission) based heavily around the glorious films of the Japanese director Akira Kurosawa (most heavily based around "The Hidden Fortress", where the Obi-Wan Kenobi prototype wins a lance duel with the Darth Vader prototype, and the Princess Leia prototype routinely beats the shit out the prototypes for C3P0 and R2-D2. It also had elements of "Yojimbo", which was also the basis for "A Fistful of Dollars.")

    The reason each film after "A New Hope" has been progressively shittier is that Lucas has forgotten to properly plagiarize from the great directors of the past. This a proven method of quality filmmaking. Kurosawa himself never minded people ripping him off, because he considered himself a heavy plagiarist of John Ford. Scorcese's (arguably) best film, "Taxi Driver", was based around Ford's "The Searchers." Great directors rip off other great directors. This makes for good filmmaking, and keeps history and a common culture alive. Lucas doesn't need more Joseph Campbell hoo-ha, he needs to remember how to rip off the great ones again.

  142. Re: mythology by Walrus99 · · Score: 0

    At the risk of being slashdotted, this is my article on Campbell and Star Wars: http://www.freenet.tlh.fl.us/~kap678/theforce/inde x.html

  143. jar jar preview in episode I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    remember all the different previews of episode I? They all took a very different approach to the movie. Sure, you want to make sure that you show what all 'sides' of your movie you have. But it seems like they were really grasping and stretching here. At least that is what I thought initially. After seeing the part about 'how it all began' showing the Old Republic, the Jedi in full force, the sith, etc... I was really pumped to finally see a movie that went back to those very interesting times so often referenced but never explained fully in books, et al.

    Then I saw the one that focused on the battles and how it became such a 'time of trouble' where hero's did their stuff, etc. That seemed pretty neat too. Then I saw the preview in which the narrator sounded like she had just been finishing up her latest Barney the Dinosaur introduction when she performed this... it was obviously aimed at children... little children. Lines like "come make a friend" and "Come share in the fun" made me just stare at the screen in shock and worry. However, denial is stronger than the force, so I kept telling myself it wasn't that bad... until I believed it.

    THEN... the movie came out and I understood. Like a kid with spare parts and glue, Lucas had created this Marketing monster that grasped wildly at all possible branches of the market in order to gain money from its 'mass appeal.' Instead of those portions being a natural and integrated part of the story, it was painfully obvious they were deliberately placed in... it reminded me of grammer school... when you would be handed 50 very odd words and would then be forced to write a story that used them all. Even then (much more so now) I thought that the attempts (mine were horrible) were very amusing and pathetic. That same awkward and blunt raping method of introducing those words was much like Episode I.

    So, I guess I was wrong after all... it seems that those previews were not stretching at all. The previews very much focused in on the very distinct and deliberate sections of the movie that were for that particular audience/market.

    So, I hope that the action in the second episode is there for a reason, not just some 'instant action-fan attractor v1.5.2' that of course would radiate to all the other aspects of the movie. I don't even scoff at the sappy portion (the love story), if it is the actual theme... any teenager can find his romantic encounters putting him over the edge, especially if denied or scorned... now add unbelievable powers with an angst ridden background and you have a terrible problem (but great for a flick :)

    However, is it baseless for me to worry that Lucas and friends will over play the love story aspect to attract more women and teenagers, etc? Will the market grabs be as obvious as the first one? As a comparison... think back to 'The Truman Show' remember how it was so painfully obvious how the wife was 'introducing' certain items with their little catch phrases to the 'audience' yet trying to make it look normal? Remember how Truman noticed this? That was like me when the lights went out at the end of Episode I... I really hope that is not the case again.

  144. Re:Jar Jar back?! Shocking. Ten serious reservatio by geekoid · · Score: 2

    a rebuttal:
    1) Not all races will have a mouth shaped like ours. Had no problem wit this my self. This might be because my son is in speech theorpy, and if there are people of this race whoi can't speek it clearly, why would we expect aliens to?

    2)Certianly thats a terran instinct, but Jar-Jar is an alien, from an underwater city. perhaps they don;t have any preditors that stalk them on the land? I suggest you read the ring world serious.

    2)(you listed 2 twice) thew Jedi are known through out the Universe has protectors of the peace. In the SW universe it wouldn't be unthinkable for someone to do this.

    3)not sure of this reference,but perhaps his race has no concept of monetary exchange?

    4)So, underwater his flight instinct is intact?

    5)hmmm ok.

    6)apperantly, SW is a cartoon now. but then so is Heavy metal, Cowboy bebop, and Akira. doesn't mean its not good. Beside, maybe Jar-Jar is using the force? Because a great meny thing happen in all the movies that defy physics.

    7)I see your point, the funny think is, if they protrayed Jar-Jar has intentionally releasing the globes, he would have been much less "goofy side kick", and far more, "Alien we don't quite understand"

    8)Again, he's alien, He is not speaking his common language. In many languages, there are words that rtanslate into "silly" phrases.

    9)again, alien race. Rudeness is a mater of social convention.

    10)Success through incompetence.
    that is through out the movie. You site anakin. ok, oops sarted ship, oops got it off the ground,oops now I'm in space, oops now I'm in a key military ship, oops, blew it up, whew, got out in "the nick of time"(won't mention how clishe ship barley excaping explosion is becoming)
    oops, go it into the atmosphere, oops managed to land it.
    sheesh.

    all that said, I didn't like Jar-Jar for one simple reason: He was close to being a geate character. Sometimes Just missing the mark is worse then missing the whole target.
    If I was to change 1 thing about EP1 I wouod remove the Medi-chloridean references. With that single thing, Lucas destroyed his mythos. Instead of "the force is strong with this one" he had to give it some root in "science".

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  145. Re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I disagree.
    George Lucas put a lot of thought into just those details. Thats what he does best. If he would back off and let the director handle the details, EP1 would have been far better.
    Thoose thing the original poster noticed is exactly what I noticed during the movie, and what I liked best about the movie.
    Clearly Anakin was genetically engineered, but by whom? probably Palpatine.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  146. Re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Personally, I think Anakin takes the dark side because he know, ultimatly it will destroy the Emperor.
    Your clue with the machine is an excellant observation. That now make 2 of us who clued in on that:)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  147. Thrash it all you want, but you'll go see it by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    I'm amused by all the yawns, the "so what" comments, the "at least I don't see that kid|jarjar|whatever". Cause you're probably all gonna go see it. Right? Right? :^)

  148. Judging a book by its cover by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

    I think it's folly to judge the upcoming episode based entirely on rumor and a couple trailers. The whole point of a trailer is to make a movie look good and entice people to see it. Very often, the trailer is much better than the movie ever could be. In extreme cases, the trailer contains the sum total of the good material in the movie. There really is no way to correlate how well a trailer is put together with how well the movie turns out. Episode 1 proved that. I've gone to see many bad movies based on exciting trailers. Conversely, I've missed many good movies because the trailer put me to sleep.
    As for Episode 2, the most recent trailer looked great, and I, for one, will see the movie, based partially on the trailer, and partially on tradition. In the end, though, the true judge of a movie's merit is the movie itself, not the trailer.

  149. Hammer's Slammers! by Feersum+Endjinn · · Score: 1

    What we need is a good Hammer's Slammers movie.

    David Drake wrote some great, gritty sf warfare stories about a mercenary troop. They have all the nasty weaponry and collateral damage you could want without ignoring the devastating effects on soldiers and non-combatants alike. They would make some great movies, but knowing the Slammer's luck their movie would get screwed over like Starship Troopers...

  150. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by drivers · · Score: 2

    "When are we going to see films that really capture the true scale of the energy levels we're going to be flinging around?"

    You mean like the Death Star?

  151. This guy should get my 5 pts by sleight · · Score: 2

    Granted that I'm unfamiliar with Graves or Frazer (must look these guys up now :-D), I definitely have to conceed that the first three movies are far truer to core mythology and, hence, perhaps, their massive appeal and generally accepted beauty.

    Indeed, the Phantom Menace did have that feel of being trapped within the mythology of the Eps IV through VI rather than continuing to freely explore mythology holistically.

    That holistic notion seemed key to Campbell's work. So he inherited that perspective? Interesting.

    Again, very insightful remark IMHO. Give kubla2000 his 5! ;-)

    1. Re:This guy should get my 5 pts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this the Robert Graves who wrote I, Claudius ? He also translated Suetonius's work, which is not unrelated...

    2. Re:This guy should get my 5 pts by kubla2000 · · Score: 2

      Isn't this the Robert Graves who wrote I, Claudius ? He also translated Suetonius's work, which is not unrelated...

      Yes it is. And it's what my doctoral thesis was about. ;-) But well spotted. The ideas in Graves' White Goddess are not totally unrelated from his Claudius books and his 'interpretation' of Seutonius, etc.

      It's not often that I get to write about my thesis on Eng Lit on /!

  152. The real reason ep1 was dissapointing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi All,
    The real reason episode 1 was somewhat dissappointing was for one reason and one reason alone. The character who is irreplacable from episode 4, 5, and 6 is OF COURSE Chewbacca! His presence was missed indeed. Lucas tried to make another char like chewy (Jar Jar) but obviously it was a horrible idea. I'd be happy if another wookie was in episode 2 and 3. Don't you all agree with me? Chewy is so tyte and Lucas just can't replace the comedy and adventures Chewy brought to episode 4, 5, and 6. Hmmm.. maybe Lucas can get Chewy's dad in his next 2 movies. Then maybe there can be a new romance of how chewy's dad met chewy's mom... It won't exactly be Forbidden Love but oh well. lol.

  153. Re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

    I've been thinking about this for a long time too... I hadn't really though about him being genetic engineered though, although it's a good theory too... I was thinking, what if Palpatine is actually his father?

    It makes so much sense... if the Emperor has "Skywalker blood", it would explain why he is so powerful in the Force, it would explain how he is able to seduce Anakin into ultimately joining him, the very same offer Anakin later makes to his own son, Luke. It would make a beautifully symmetrical story of family redemption, with Palpatine being evil, Luke being good, and Anakin is the "balance" in between. Lucas HAS planned out the overall story outline since the very beginning.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  154. CGI Doth Not a Movie Make by derch · · Score: 1

    Ooooo.... CGI....

    Yah, it's amazing what they can do with computers these days, but without an interesting story and quality acting and directing, you do not have a movie - You have a long stip of film with bland pictures.

    Now, I could overlook your comment about CGI on a 40 screen and yada yada yada if you were talking about the latest movie mass produced by Hollywood (Resident Evil), but we're talking Star Wars here. Star Wars isn't about the CGI.... *ahem* Star Wars SHOULDN'T have been about the CGI, but looks like Lucas is just creaming himself again with what he can do with computers.

    Moderators: I'm not trolling, I'm just pissed that Episode II is going to suck like Episode I did.

  155. pattern recognition as first sign of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what you say definitely has merit, and many do jump to quickly into judging something on very superficial merits. However, we must take the factor into account that much of this is either de'javu (sp?) or that perhaps we have seen this before (not just in Episode I but in all movies, TV, books, adaptations, etc)

    Furthermore, let us put it in perspective. First of all, the trailer is supposed to let you know what the movie is about, so that if people misinterpret it, then maybe that means the trailer is bad (or that they have enough of that producers deceit and manipulation for awhile to smell a skunk again [the pattern recognition])

    Second, and this is probably the part that pertains to your comment on missing a movie because of being put to sleep by the trailer... EVERYONE is going to see this movie. It really doesn't matter what Lucass does with the movie, or if he advertises or produces trailers... people will watch it anyway. Word of mouth is only superceeded here by the hype of the media and fan sites.

    I'm gonna watch it, you better believe it. Why? Because I have a very irrational and illogical hope that it will be good, that it will not be another "the Marketing Menace" and will actually have a well planned and implemented STORY! that does not rely on trickery (advertisement, sight/sound, etc) to make the movie but rather uses everything in its enourmous budget to augment and enhance the underlying STORY!!!!!!!!

    No cute little boys that cute their way through a battle, no pathetic plot/character tie ins that make any sane person want to throw up (i.e. Anakin making C3P0... come on now?!)

    I just hope that on that last comment... that there is not a repeat with EP II. Just imagine, they could show Han Solo as a baby meeting a younger (but still about 100+ years old) wookie on some random encounter. Perhaps Lando's dad can meet Han's dad (or the baby's could meet). Or any other silly, stupid attempt of a moron to forcefully introduce ties into the movie. Couple that with the fact that there would probably be very little 'legitimate' tie ins, as Tarkin and any of the main Rebel Generals (can't remember names off hand). Optionally, based on the popularity of the X-wing: Rogue Squadron series, and the character in general, it might be a good thing to tie in the Halcyon Jedi line into the fate of the conflict (not just mention, but a key role).

  156. 5 movies in 25+ years? by clangro · · Score: 0

    Who honestly cares anymore?

    I feel about Star Wars the same way I feel about bands like Tool.

    I respect their contribution to their art, but I don't like them I feel they're both overhyped to Hell.

    Star Wars was a break through sci-fi film, but what the Hell was so special about it? The mediocre acting? The cheesy story? The laughable concept of it all? The predictability of everything?

    And it just keeps getting progressively worse. I don't see how anyone who was a fan of the first three movies after seeing Episode 1 could still wet his pants at the sheer mention of "Attack of the Clones".

    The only thing I love that Lucas did was create the THX standard. Nothing like the quality sound and picture you get with that.

    I've come to one overwhelming conclusion. Star Wars is the most overhyped, mediocre movie series ever made that only people who have no outlet for creativity like.

    How many Goddamn people need to dress up like Boba Fett during a sci fi convention, like a thousand? Contact me when you get a shred of creativity in your persona.

  157. If you can say "fag" can you say "bigot" by JustAnother+AI · · Score: 1

    when you said "fags" were you refering to cigarets or you ignorance.

    --
    You thought you were special...Don't worry you were prgramed that way.
  158. Star Wars IS schtick by kannen · · Score: 1
    "I have a bad feeling about this"
    "What's that smell?"/"What an incredible smell you've discovered."
    "It's not my fault!"
    "What a hunk of junk!"/"You fly that thing? You're braver than I thought."
    Everybody turning C-3PO up or otherwise shutting him up.

    Star Wars has always been loaded with intense amounts of corny schtick. We should not be surprised by any occurrences of it in these latest movies. In fact, its part of why we like these movies so damned much - because they are both great (in the heroic\world myth\good vs. evil sense) and because they are so human. The difference, of course, is that it seems to me that the earlier group of actors were better able to pull it off.

  159. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by niftyeric · · Score: 1

    Try the science non-fiction section, thanks. ;)

    Anyway, that isn't what Star Wars is, and you can't tell me you were really expecting that in the trailer/up coming movie, can you? It would be cool, but not in the Star Wars universe.

    --
    proton != antielectron
  160. Taking bets by xihr · · Score: 1

    Now we get to take bets on whether or not Episode Two will be even worse than Episode One. What an unmitigated piece of proverbial crap.

  161. What Lucas should do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is forgo the CGI,and just have Pamela Anderson dancing in a bikini with a Dr Suess hat and glow sticks for 2 hours.

  162. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    > Try the science non-fiction section, thanks. ;)

    Star Wars is more a fantasy or fairy tale than science fiction (nothing wrong with that, just look at LoTR). Lucas seemed to be pushing the fairy tale part rather hard in episode 1 though :/

    > Anyway, that isn't what Star Wars is, and you can't tell me you were really expecting that in the trailer/up coming movie, can you?

    Nope, I was more suggesting that the Star Wars universe is a bit lame and wishing we could spend the millions on something new and less on the children's fantasy end of the spectrum.

    Not that Star Wars doesn't have a ligitimate place in all of this too, but suspending disbelief and switching to watch-and-drool mode constantly gets tiring.

  163. Better sooner than later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God I'm so glad the Male birthrate is going down (since 1990 your fascistdot punks)...soon all these internet postings will be nearly empty, much less annoying, and more intelligent and constructive, and much more positive...power to the women!

  164. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by niftyeric · · Score: 1

    "watch-and-drool mode" is when Natalie Portman is in front of the camera. :P

    --
    proton != antielectron
  165. Guess you didn't like LOTR? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    But overall, he has the chance to make a coherent hole of the trilogy, which is something I don't feel Lucas has been able to do with the time he's had.

    A hole eh? Well, i guess that's what they turned Isengaard into *G*

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  166. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    Lucas's movies from the 70's are the primary reason (debatably equal with Spielberg's movies) for the "blockbuster-centric" state of the movie industry today. (i.e. opening weekend-oriented, with receipts fading fast even for popular films, therefore "hyper-able" films with a fast return get the most attention).

    There are a number of reasons for the high opening draw which drops rather quickly. Back in the 80's or 70's, what were the chances of getting in to see a hot movie on the opening weekend if you didn't want to stand in line? Not very good. Today, the chances are pretty good to excellent, depending where you live. The difference? The number of screens showing the movie. In today's age of huge cinema multiplexes, you have far more showings of first-weekend movies than you did a few decades ago. Then, you might have had to wait a weekend or two to see a movie, but now there are so many screens that everyone can go on the opening weekend without too much trouble (especially for the theaters which sell tickets in advance online -- that's how I saw LotR on opening night). So now you can get the large push on one weekend, and then there is a huge dropoff since most of the people who wanted to see it already have. It's the special movies that people truly like that don't have the sharp dropoff. The huge opening weekend+dropoff model has actually been better for the movie companies, since word-of-mouth for a poor movie doesn't have enough time to do major damage by then. So yes, you might be able to blame moviemakers like Lucas for that behavior, but I'd say the largest reason for it is the greater number of screens.

  167. Games Here We come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the looks of the trailer, it looks like they're 90% done with the game, I'm sure to be released the same weekend as the movie...

  168. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    A massive confrontation like this unfortunately leaves little room for personal interaction. Sure, you might have the last minute Kennedy to Khrushchev calls, but other than that, the plot would involve millions of people being blown up without even knowing the individual who pressed the button. Moviegoers want to watch movies that have some relevance to their life, and interpersonal relationships is one of the more complex and challenging topics for movies to explore.

    These two features are not mutually exclusive though. You can have personal interaction and much of the high-intensity impact the original poster was talking about. The problem is that it would be a very difficult stunt to pull off and would require a truly talented set of filmmakers to do it. It's not an impossible task, just one that would be difficult to do well.

  169. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    Two capital ships dueling with weapons that could level an entire planet is infinitely more cool than a bunch of little starfighters (that are never, ever going to exist in real life)

    Why not?

    somehow blowing apart a ship hundreds of times larger by ramming into its bridge.

    Don't you remember the Kamikaze's from WW2? Imagine if those little fighter planes were stocked with nuclear/anti-matter weapons/material designed to detonate on impact. Seems to me a smaller/more manueverable craft might be a better choice since immense firepower does not necessarily require immense size.

  170. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    Well, there's an anime series called Lensman that I remember watching back in the 80's. Here's a link.

  171. Star wars 2 by sdgscott · · Score: 0

    Looking 4ward to the trailer but even more 4 the movie

    --
    sdgscott
  172. LOTR trailer vs Star Wars trailer by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but after seeing both the trailers in one go for the first time, I knew what movie I wanted to see. Star Wars, Episode 2 -may- be good, but the trailer is boring compared to LOTR.

    Ok, so this is slightly trollish, but I just had to say it! :)

  173. Re:Jar Jar back?! Shocking. Ten serious reservatio by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    I agree with... most of your points. Jar Jar was completely unessential to the plot, and was really only there for merchandising reasons. Hell, he more unessential than the Ewoks, who at least seemed to have purpose. But...

    And of course, they're led into battle by "General" Jar Jar, who surrenders at the first opportunity (To an army with orders to commit genocide, no less! "Wipe them out--All of them!" Surrender means certain death!).

    Ok, it's been awhile since I've seen Episode I, but.. how was Jar Jar supposed to know that genocide was the goal of the robot army? We had the luxury of seeing the Sith Lord's orders to the evildoers, so we knew what was up, but none of the good guys were ever told about that. In fact, the main role of the Gungan army was simply to distract the forces on the planet (not destroy the entire army) while the robot base was taken out from orbit. Given all that, surrendering was not a stupid move from their side, since there was no reason for them to think that they would be killed after surrendering -- these were simply merchants in a trade route dispute with a small army of disablable robots. Committing genocide would be extremely uncharacteristic of them (from the good guys' perspective), especially considering how the Senate might have come down on them hard for such an action.

    What the heck does "Maxi big da force" mean anyway

    Heheh, I always thought he was saying "Maxi dig da force," though it's not like that's any less stupid. ;-)

  174. who's a bigger jack ass? by evilpaul13 · · Score: 2

    The folks at apple or the folks at lucasfilms? Those morons blocked any referral to the link from /.

  175. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by jafac · · Score: 2

    I dunno - there were some bits to Babylon 5 where there was definately some harsh high-end military mayhem going on:

    The Centauri orbital bombardment of the Narn homeworld.
    The Shadows' destruction of the Earth outpost.
    I even forget the one planet the Shadows destroyed with the ground penetrating nukes.
    Then there's Sheridan's destruction of Khazad Dum with the R/C spaceship loaded with nukes.

    Unfortunately, in this case, the production budget wasn't up to portraying the kind of detail you're looking for.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  176. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by jdbo · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is something which I see as mismanagement on the part of theaters - it costs a great deal to maintain the multi-screen multiplexes, and the growth in the number of movies shown on those screens (as well as the per-screen-profit) has not kept up with the number of screens, and in some areas, the number of theaters.

    the result is that it's easier to see a movie "instantly"; however, this means that a movie _must_ make its money back "instantly"; there's very little leeway for allowing non-blockbuster films under this format, as a movie must be able to pay off its costs in an increasingly compressed time window.

    this is exacerbated by the fact that the "hype machine" pushing blockbusters greatly increases the costs of these already costly (both to producers as well as distrbutors and theater-owners) films. It also incidentally lessens the public's appetite for a broader spectrum of film, as people tend to go to see what they've heard, seen, and read about. The days of going to the movies without knowing what's playing are long gone in this country.

    Admittedly, my knowledge of this is limited to reports I have read in various business publications (Businessweek, et al.) but the overall pattern of increased theater building and disproportionately decreasing per-theater profits does indicate a pattern of overgrowth.

    and personally, I wouldn't mind encountering sold-out theaters - ooh, i have to wait a day - or even buy a ticket in advance - in exchange for having 13 different movies on the 13 different screens at my local theater instead of 6. Heck, I'd settle for 9.

    More importantly, I enjoy seeing movies in packed theaters. There's a real communal element that I miss when watching video; I find it depressing to see a "blockbuster" in a large theater with only 50 other people (because the other 200 are spread across 4 other screens).

    Yes, BTW, I do enjoy blockbuster movies; I've got the hankering to see SWEP2; it's just that this isn't the _only_ type of movie I like to see, and that's the (rather submerged) point of what I was rambling about.

  177. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by jdbo · · Score: 1

    BTW, an implied (shoulda been explicit) idea behind the last post was that theaters have increased the number of screens they show movies on, as well as the number of screens they show a _single_ movie on, in response the the increasing demand for "blockbuster" movies. please pardon the omission.

  178. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Agthorr · · Score: 1
    So watch Babylon 5! sheesh. You complain like these things don't exist ;)

    -- Agthorr

  179. Did anyone notice the URL at the end? by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

    It wasn't the standard starwars.com link. It was to the site at holonetnews.com which pretends to be a website in the Star Wars universe. Granted, this isn't the first film to have websites in its fictional universe, but I was surprised at some of the humor in it. A lot of web-specific humor like the "click the nuna" banner ad. Didn't expect it from Lucasfilm.

  180. Re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by Dufffader · · Score: 1

    Why Tatooine you ask.... simply because its an excuse for the crew of Star Wars to go back to that place in Tunisia where they shoot all those desert scenes...

  181. Re:/.'ed and blocking referrals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They ban external referrals, you fucking idiot. try loading the site without a referral before you make a fool of yourself next time, if thats not too complicated for you.

  182. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go away mr|ms law student!

  183. MIRROR OFF AT 0700 PST ON TUE 12.MARCH.2002 by ciurana · · Score: 2

    We need the bandwidth to get back to work. I'm sure you can find another mirror elsewhere.

    Cheers!

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  184. Re:Anakin 2 Vader (spoiler?) by dpt · · Score: 1


    Watching EP1 last night on the Movie channel I had a rather interesting insight.
    That Anakin is/was always the second Sith [candidate].

    Anakin 'imaculate conception', hint's of genetic engineer, aka The Clone-Wars.


    Yes, that's also what I suspect. I'll go a step further ... Vader had not only external injuries but apparantly massive internal ones that required the used of artificial lungs, regular use of a decompression chamber of some kind, and so on.

    Did they remember to remove that explosive that Anakin was implanted with? Perhaps Obi-Wan figures out how to set it off when Anakin joins the dark side ... after that only his hate/link to the dark side keeps him alive.

  185. ???/ Is the whole movie just CG? by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    Looks like the whole movie is one giant mass of CG.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  186. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    > So watch Babylon 5!

    Still has an overdose of aliens-with-generic-ridged-foreheads-and-stereotyp es, and space battles consisting mostly of firing primary coloured blobs around at 30mph. Acceleration doesn't seem to effect anyone either, despite their lack of artificial gravity.

    It does at least have a believable flight model and less inconsitant universe.

    Anyway, isn't B5 dead? I don't see anyone pumping $200m into it :)

  187. Most expensive soap opera/video game cutscene ever by voiceofthewhirlwind · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but the video still looks like a soap opera or BBC production (all of which use video, to save money apparently) however many lines of resolution it has. And every single shot looks like it's either all CG or a composite with CG background- but the technology just isn't there yet: the difference between the CG lighting and the set lighting, as well as the color rendered by the computer and that captured in video are still to great to look more convincing (that the actor is really in the environment around them) than Command & Conquer or Myst video sequences.

    Why does Lucas even bother with live actors at all when the results has the foreground characters looking so inconsistent with all the CG in the backgrounds? He could just scan in the bodies of all the actors and motion-capture their movements, and then render all at once with no compositing. Maybe that's what's in store for EP3...

  188. MIRROR OFF NOW -- TUE 12.MARCH.2002 1900 PST by ciurana · · Score: 2

    Greetings,

    I finally turned the AOTC mirror off. Only the people who are currently downloading the file (it's 1900 PST on Tuesday) have access to it.

    Thanks for helping us stress test the lines; now we know for sure what our effective bandwidth is.

    Cheers!

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  189. Fuck this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot Sucks Posting a link that requires
    Quick Time where the fuck am i supposed to get
    a quick time plugin for galeon.

    Ignorance is bliss!
    but in Your case its orgasmic.

  190. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most accurate post on the thread.

  191. Re:Yawn.. can't we have something really spectacul by TeaDaemon · · Score: 1

    From that site, it seems worth a look. I heard somebody was working on a live action/cgi version a la Star Wars, now that could really be something spectacular.

  192. Re:...$ for Ep2 vs. anti-MPAA not the only issue.. by subgeek · · Score: 1

    i can't help it. love star wars, must nit pick.

    Lucas's narratives tend to reflect a rather benevolently feudal/fascist view of the world, in which an elite group (Jedi) rules over/provides protection to the general classes

    don't the Jedi serve the republic? doesn't a republic involve government by representation of the masses?

    he has furthermore stated his preference for "benevolent dictator" style organization for his businesses (Lucasfilm/ILM/etc.), as well as indicating that his films are very specifically his own (versus "for the fans")...

    i think an artist who is concerned about the interpretation of his work makes his art less valid. i don't always agree with lucas' artistic decisions (jar-jar), but he has the right as an artist to make them. picasso would have been less of an artist had he worried about how critics might percieve it.

    as an artist, a person has something to say. if the artist listens too much to the audience, they stop saying anything and simply tell people what they want to hear. the desire to make movies based on what people want to hear is the thing that makes so many movies bad. they become uninspired and uninspiring.

    --
    you probably shouldn't have read this.