Slashdot Mirror


Felt Tip Marker Defeats Copy-Protected CDs

We posted this story over a week ago but the mainstream media has flooded us with stories about felt tip markers and copy protected CDs so I figured I'd post it again since I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions from people who didn't read Slashdot on May 13 ;) Basically you can mark the rim of some CDs and defeat the copy protection. And we all know what the DMCA says about tools for circumventing copy protection.

383 comments

  1. Repeat by quantaman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Haha they posted a repeat the editors are such...

    Ummmm nevermind

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Repeat by zootread · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hmmm, well.. I completed missed this the first time they posted about it. I tend to read the titles first and then the details, and thus skipped over it the first time. No harm done by posting a repeat. Especially something that is this hilarious.

      --
      Zoot!
    2. Re:Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's something I'd expect from timothy, but cmdrtaco? Oh well, guess they need more page hits.

    3. Re:Repeat by GuruDino · · Score: 1

      Hey I'm glad they posted it twice. I missed it the first time. "The sharpie is mightier than the data track!" I just love it when low tech defeats high tech. The whole system is in for a complete overhaul.

    4. Re:Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this post off-topic?

      We posted this story over a week ago

  2. DCMA tools hmmm...... by Papa+Legba · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Well I guess Office max and Office Depot are now fubard. Overnight they have become distributers of devices used to circumvent copy protection. I hope the RIAA goes easy on them....

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:DCMA tools hmmm...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god you explained that joke. I'm sure many readers would not have understood Taco's DMCA hint without your help.

    2. Re:DCMA tools hmmm...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, let's take some of those felt-tip pens and do a number on Ms. Rosen ala those "Captain was here" ads

  3. Ah I see by gazbo · · Score: 4, Funny
    All this time I've complained at duplicate articles, now I see it's a 'feature' not a 'bug'.

    Where have I heard that before?

    1. Re:Ah I see by Ross+Finlayson · · Score: 1
      All this time I've complained at duplicate articles, now I see it's a 'feature' not a 'bug'.

      1. Slashdot needs advertising revenue to survive
      2. Duplicate stories increase the number of ads that are shown and viewed. Therefore,
      3. Slashdot has an incentive to post duplicate stories :-)
    2. Re:Ah I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. There's no lack of new stories. Were there to be no new stories to post and only the option of posting a duplicate, then you would be correct. You are not correct, though, and posting duplicates is still kinda silly.

    3. Re:Ah I see by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      You're missing the real objective here: slashdot wants to get more revenue from all the readers that are compelled to reply to duplicate stories. They get MORE traffic on dupes, because not only to readers view them, they are powerless to resist replying to them. That adds up to several more page hits.

  4. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear several RIAA members have brought a suit against Sharpie for violating the DMCA. :-)

  5. To be on the safe side... by Andorion · · Score: 4, Funny

    I threw out all my felt-tip markers when I read about this... I wouldn't want to have any tools for the circumvention of copy protection around my house.

    -Berj

    1. Re:To be on the safe side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Felt-tip or not, do we really wanna keep buying new CDS and support the RIAA------used CDs only for my money!

    2. Re:To be on the safe side... by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that isn't sufficient. Any reasonably sharp object (knife, pen, pencil, nail, screw) can be used to scratch the top foil-like layer of a CD, making it unreadable where scratched. This would bypass the copy protection just as well.

    3. Re:To be on the safe side... by martyn+s · · Score: 1
      Felt-tip or not, do we really wanna keep buying new CDS and support the RIAA------used CDs only for my money!


      By buying used CDs you are reducing the number of used CDs on the market, thereby forcing someone else, someone with less integrity than you, to buy that CD for retail. Buy indie or download.

    4. Re:To be on the safe side... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      I use all my felt tip markers to label mp3 CDs I make... I guess now I need to just guess where the music files are that I want.

  6. Oh well. by Zathruss · · Score: 0

    I've preemtively removed all felt marker from our office. Last thing I need is to spend time in a foreign prison, thanks.

  7. trolls by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    "...so I figured I'd post it again since I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions from people who didn't read Slashdot on May 13"

    OMG. Earth to Malda: You can expect to see exponential growth in troll post story submissions from now on. You have proven that persistence pays.

    1. Re:trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This really should be marked as insightfull. it isn;t a threat but a real concern he's brought to your attention. Think about it, you basicly said that if enoug people try to post the same story, no matter ifit's already been posted you'll give in to it because you're too lazy to assign a filter to all submited stories containging the words copy protection and felt tip marker.

    2. Re:trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >assign a filter to all submited stories containging the words copy protection and felt tip marker.

      Okay. How about:

      "RIAA (MR) sues Sharpie (R) over use of Sharpie brand (TM) felt tip markers to defeat CD copy protection"

      That's a new hot story sure to surface that I wouldn't want to miss.

  8. oops! by mattyohe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry Taco! I submitted it yesterday :( Its amazing what you miss when you dont visit /. daily

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  9. Second first post? by matthew.thompson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hmmmnnn - sorta takes the fun out of trying to get a decent first post now.

    M@t :o(

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    1. Re:Second first post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope I'm gunna get a royalty for the use of m@. Glad to see you liked it when I posted as M@ygfunk. Ahhhh... imatation is the greatest form of flattery.

    2. Re:Second first post? by matthew.thompson · · Score: 1

      How long have you been using M@? I've got over 7 years of history of that one starting with my M_at@msn.com logon. - I also assume you're using it as a contraction of 'Mat' and not 'Ma' ;o)

      M@t :o)

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  10. me and jesus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me and my buddy jESUS the monkey having been using felt markers to break that copy protect for months. get with the times!! Read the bible and name your monkey jesus!! wooooo!

  11. Will Staples be liable? by warpSpeed · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Does this mean that Staples or Office Depot will be liable for trafficking DMCA circumventions devices?

    How would you like to be arrested in the marker alsle? Freeze! Drop the marker, slowly!

    1. Re:Will Staples be liable? by Dossy · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. Staples, Office Depot and the others could be required to report names and addresses of buyers of felt tip markers, similar to the FBI and their "watched book list" (which might just be urban legend, but the point still remains ...)

  12. Confused editor by AirLace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And we all know what the DMCA says about tools for circumventing copy protection.

    I thought the DMCA only stipulates laws for devices designed specifically copyright violation? A marker pen clearly doesn't fall into this category. Otherwise they could have outlawed CD burners, photocopiers and who knows what else by now.

    1. Re:Confused editor by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought the DMCA only stipulates laws for devices designed specifically copyright violation? A marker pen clearly doesn't fall into this category. Otherwise they could have outlawed CD burners, photocopiers and who knows what else by now.

      Tell that to Dmitry.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Confused editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If those items weren't already so common, I'm sure they'd try. Since they can't exactly ban common everyday objects like CDRs, they simply collect taxes on them.

    3. Re:Confused editor by PushyB · · Score: 1

      But if someone patents the marker as a CD "optimizing tool", then DMCA can confiscate.

      --
      Denise
      Will manage Novell network for money.
    4. Re:Confused editor by sydlexic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if the MPAA/RIAA has their way, these evil tools (and others) will be outlawed. if you buy a DVD player or VCR in 5 years, it will have two buttons: power and play.

    5. Re:Confused editor by rsidd · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I thought the DMCA only stipulates laws for devices designed specifically copyright violation?

      No. Read the DMCA. It outlaws devices which can be used for bypassing digital copy control mechanisms, regardless of possible legitimate uses. CD burners don't pass copy control mechanisms, photocopiers don't deal with digital media (unless it's a barcode or something...). But a felt-tip pen which is used to bypass the manufacturer's CD copy control mechanism -- that's illegal under the DMCA, and I hope somebody sues for outlawing these evil things, that should show 'em...

    6. Re:Confused editor by Querty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Otherwise they could have outlawed CD burners, photocopiers and who knows what else by now.

      They are most likely working on getting those restricted at this very moment...

      Next is the banning of uncensored Internet, shortly followed by requiring all the women to wear shrouds.

      See you on the other side....

      --
      Being paranoid is FUN!

    7. Re:Confused editor by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Yes, that means its illigal in the USA to sell a pen that says "CD protection disabler" on it. Oh, the land of the free...

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    8. Re:Confused editor by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

      Remember back in your younger years when shop owners wouldn't sell eggs, paint, or model glue to kids unless a parent was present, since they retailers wouldn't know the deviant hooligans were going to use the stuff for graffiti, public defacement, and getting high (but not in that order)?

      Well, look to register to the Feds to obtain a Sharpie....

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    9. Re:Confused editor by Garion911 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the MPAA and manufactures would love that.

      DVD/VCR player with no eject button!

      (guess you would have to call it a VCP, since the R is no longer there..)

      --
      Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
    10. Re:Confused editor by ThePilgrim · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry but thats one button too many.

      It will only have one button; eject.

      The VCR/DVD/CD Player will be allways on and will have to be connected to the phone line in order to work (so that your listning/veiwing habits can be tracked).

      In fact we can probably get away without the eject button, if we make all players one shot devices.

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    11. Re:Confused editor by DennyK · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you mean power and pay? ;-D

      DennyK

    12. Re:Confused editor by james_underscore · · Score: 1

      I don't know for sure about the exact terms of the DMCA, but CD-Burners and Photocopiers don't circumvent any kind of copy protection technology, the whole point of the copy protection on music CDs is to stop CD burners copying them, so thats why they can't be banned.

      That said, the existing cases of the eBook reader and DeCSS clearly were designed to circumvent technology, so you may be right.

      All in all, I think it was a humorous comment and I don't think anyone expects markers and post-it notes to get banned.

    13. Re:Confused editor by HuskyDog · · Score: 2
      I thought the DMCA only stipulates laws for devices designed specifically copyright violation?

      I seem to recall that in the latest 2600 DMCA appeal the judge basically said that when Congress passed the DMCA it intended to outlaw circumvention devices even if they had other legitimate uses. Sadly, I can't now find the link where I read this.

    14. Re:Confused editor by soybean · · Score: 1

      Sure, but, the information describing how to do it is designed specifically for such a purpose.

    15. Re:Confused editor by crazy+blade · · Score: 1

      Of course, interpreting "legalese" usually favors the 'bullying' party. I mean, how can one argue that any device is designed specifically for copyright violation, if it can do anything else which is useful?

      If one were to create a CD reader which will read even damaged CDs, it would be particularly useful for 'disaster recovery' of data on a damaged CD-ROM. If this CD reader can retrieve the data from this copy protected CD, is it then designed specifically to circumvent copy protection?

      --
      To err is human, but to forgive is beyond the scope of the Operating System...
    16. Re:Confused editor by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are correct. Unfortunatly, the price of sharpies will quadruple to pay for 'piracy potential'.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    17. Re:Confused editor by L1nUx+h4x0r · · Score: 0

      And we all know what the DMCA says about tools for circumventing copy protection.

      What you mean is, "*I* pretend to know what the DMCA says..."

      I thought the DMCA only stipulates laws for devices designed specifically copyright violation? A marker pen clearly doesn't fall into this category. Otherwise they could have outlawed CD burners, photocopiers and who knows what else by now.

      Based on the rulings provided in the case of US v. Elcomsoft Co., the DMCA forbids:

      Congress did not ban the act of circumventing the use restrictions. Instead, Congress banned only the trafficking in and marketing of devices primarily designed to circumvent the use restriction protective technologies. Congress did not prohibit the act of circumvention because it sought to preserve the fair use rights of persons who had lawfully acquired a work.

      So, it isn't that the device is specifically designed for copyright violation, but that it's primary purpose it to circumvent copyright protections. This is why a photocopier is okay but the Advanced eBook Processor isn't.

      --
      The GPL makes software more like your mom. Free and open to all.
    18. Re:Confused editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention that. The grocery store I work at was actually asked by the local police department to not sell toilet paper to anyone under 18. Apparently vandalism is enough of a problem to warrent such precautions. I doubt it makes any real difference though.

    19. Re:Confused editor by L1nUx+h4x0r · · Score: 0

      I believe you're looking for the judge's order on the dismissal of the case requested by Elcomsoft. The /. story is here and the ruling is here.

      --
      The GPL makes software more like your mom. Free and open to all.
    20. Re:Confused editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, look to register to the Feds to obtain a Sharpie....

      Fuck that, I'll just steal the shit from work #;^)

    21. Re:Confused editor by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I thought the DMCA only stipulates laws for devices designed specifically copyright violation?


      Have you been paying attention? The DMCA is constantly invoked in legal threats against technologies that have legitimate uses. Poke around Slashdot's stories.


      Otherwise they could have outlawed CD burners, photocopiers and who knows what else by now.


      CD burners and photocopiers do not circumvent copy protection schemes. And that leads in to an interesting point.


      DeCCS was an interesting example of a technology attacked with DMCA claims despite its claims towards the DMCA's own interoperability clause. Yet, to pirate a DVD, one simply needs to make a bit-for-bit copy of the DVD, leaving the CCS "copy protection" scheme in place.

    22. Re:Confused editor by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet at least one person has had an embarassing incident over this...

    23. Re:Confused editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasnt there a business who went to court to find if thier product was NOT breaking the DMCA?

      Couldnt someone do the same thing and request that the Sharpies be declared ok under the DMCA in federal court?

      Sounds stupid, but these are some stupid times.

    24. Re:Confused editor by Creepy · · Score: 1

      photocopiers have already had their day in court, and were deemed legal as a way to create legitimate backups of documents. It is still illegal to photocopy documents with copy protection built in, otherwise we'd all dupe our money.

      CD burners slid through with the same argument as above. Several groups tried to stop them, so it wasn't easy.

      Uncensored internet is already banned - see COPA. It has a few more fights to win in court, but unfortunately, it's been winning them...

      According to scrolls used to translate the bible, all women should wear shrouds. I've only seen them in one printed version, though - I think it was the revised standard. The Koran isn't alone.

      What I don't remember is if the dress code thingies were required or recommended in either book. I do remember that I violated a bunch of the rules for men - I had long hair and beard at the time I read the revised standard and those were strict no-nos. Then again, so did Jesus in most paintings of him (both black and white-idealized images), so I guess it doesn't matter that much :)

    25. Re:Confused editor by hyperizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell that to Dmitry.

      But Dmitry's software was specifically designed to circumvent Adobe's (measly) ebook copy protection. Felt tip pens are not specifically designed to circumvent Sony's CD copy protection...

    26. Re:Confused editor by rsidd · · Score: 2

      Actually I may have overstated things a bit: read the thread a little further down. But telling people how to do this is unquestionably in violation of the DMCA. CNN, Reuters, watch out.

    27. Re:Confused editor by Creepy · · Score: 1

      yeah, they started to ban spray paint when I was in my teens. I could still walk into a drug store and buy Saltpeter off the shelf, though. Saltpeter and sugar - the best smoke bombs :)

    28. Re:Confused editor by okvol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hollingsworth is submitting a bill to make it manditory to have a device on all felt tip pens to prevent use on copy-protected CDs.

      --
      cabg x3 is a life changing event...
    29. Re:Confused editor by Clue4All · · Score: 2

      His software was designed solely for the purpose of pirating eBooks. I'm not sure why we're giving this guy or his company a break for repeated dubious behavior. Not everything should be free, like my hard work.

      --

      Is your browser retarded?
    30. Re:Confused editor by donnacha · · Score: 1

      Three buttons: Power, Play and Buy the T-shirt.

    31. Re:Confused editor by stratocaster · · Score: 2, Insightful


      While I do like the joke of the marker being used to circumvent the DMCA, I believe the
      analogy is completely flawed. The pen is just a *tool* to create a particular *type* of circumvention device (in
      this case a mark on the CD). For example, with DeCSS, your text editor (where you edit the C code)
      or compiler are not circumvention devices, they are tools which allow you to create the device (
      source code or executable code -- these both seem to be considered circumvention devices.)

      An illustration: one could imagine a product which consisted of a mostly clear, CD-sized sleeve with a small
      sliver of black on it which would do the same thing as this mark on the pen. It would be this sleeve -- which
      one inserts the CD in -- that would be illegal, and not the materials that it was made out of. To conclude,
      the resultant ink mark is the actual circumvention device, not the marker.

    32. Re:Confused editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more to copyright law than just the DMCA. There's also Supreme Court precedents. In Sony v. Universal City, the SC ruled that VCR's didn't violate copyright (even though they explicity make copies of copyrighted works) because they had "substantial non-infringing uses." That's why the DMCA prohibits tools whose "primary" use is to defeat copyright protection systems.

    33. Re:Confused editor by roybadami · · Score: 5, Insightful

      His software was designed solely for the purpose of pirating eBooks.

      FUD

      His tool was designed solely to allow copying of e-book data to another format. Not all copying is piracy; some is fair use.
    34. Re:Confused editor by roybadami · · Score: 1

      I mean, how can one argue that any device is designed specifically for copyright violation, if it can do anything else which is useful?

      Well, you could ask the designer. Most technological inventions are designed to solve a specific set of problems. So it is often a matter of fact as to what something was designed for.

      Of course, it may still be difficult to establish the design intent if the designers are not available or are not considered credible witnesses.
    35. Re:Confused editor by Sensei_knight · · Score: 1

      In recent news power companies together with their suppliers have started paying manufacturers to remove the power buttons from all consumer electronics.

    36. Re:Confused editor by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Maybe not the markers, but the instructions in the Reuters article damn well do count as an anti-circumvention device, as much as DeCSS source code or a cryptanalysis of CSS encryption would be.

    37. Re:Confused editor by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I think his remark was meant to be sarcastic ;)

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    38. Re:Confused editor by morcego · · Score: 2

      Your analogy is incorrect.
      If it was true, then DeCSS is also not a circunvection device. Your computer processor is. Or your DVD-Drive.

      --
      morcego
    39. Re:Confused editor by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Read your own post. Before the DMCA, it didn't matter what it's "primary" use was, all that mattered was that it had "substantial non-infringing uses." Dmitri's ebook thing had substantial non-infringing uses.

      I guess the interpretations of these laws is making it clear that they don't want you to be able to read your ebook on any other device, or convert it to braille, and those are *not* substantial non-infringing uses. Oh well.

    40. Re:Confused editor by zaffir · · Score: 1

      It was designed to break copy protection, which is a no-no according to the DMCA, whether you really have a right to copy lit or not.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    41. Re:Confused editor by michaelangelo · · Score: 1

      Telling people isn't proscribed by the DMCA. What's covered is making, using, trafficing, etc. The DMCA does not contain prohibtions against describing circumvention technology. Now if you claim to be describing a method by providing computer source code, you'll be crossing into something courts have found to be illegal.

    42. Re:Confused editor by tshak · · Score: 2

      Good post but FYI it's DeCSS which is decrypts CSS or the Content Scrambling System found on DVD's.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    43. Re:Confused editor by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2

      yeah and then the burning of books so that all content will exist only in digital format.

    44. Re:Confused editor by fishebulb · · Score: 2

      your stupid.

      so i guess the FBI was only wanting to pirate ebooks, because they purchased that software.

      i doubt many people will purchase that software, if they only want to use it to pirate ebooks. they are stealing books, they will still the software.

      someone who buys that software, will have a legit use for it

    45. Re:Confused editor by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      The real catch here is a VCP with no rewind. There won't be any DVD's as they will figure out that with video cassettes and no rewind, they will have your viewing habits, as you will have to purchase a new tape each time you wish to watch something!!! To assure this, they will likely not really attach the tape to one spool to make sure that you don't build an illegal external rewinder. They wouldn't want you to be able to view that tape that you legally purchased more than one time.

      If there is a DVD at the time, it will actually be a DVD rewriter and there will be a signal at the end of the DVD that forces an erase on it. But the unit will be sealed with explosives so that they will know if you attempt to open it and illegally us the writer portion or disable it. Not large explosives, just enough to remove your hands (the device being used to circumvent their protection of intellectual properties). After all, that is their right, and the rights of the few exceed the rights of the many.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    46. Re:Confused editor by Blue23 · · Score: 2

      Hollingsworth is submitting a bill to make it manditory to have a device on all felt tip pens to prevent use on copy-protected CDs.

      Don't be silly, it just introduced a bill so that only the RIAA can manufacture felt tip pens, this way they can charge an appropriate rate for them to offset the profits lost due to potential piracy using them.

      Oh, and a rider on it extends the blank media "tax" to also include paper. Both lined and unlined.

      =Blue(23)

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    47. Re:Confused editor by GSloop · · Score: 2

      But fair use would allow you to "break" the protection to backup the work (PDF) or to move it to another device. These are not copyright infringements.

      The facts are, that the DMCA doesn't make any exception for uses that wouldn't infringe copyright. If it's a circumvention device, it's illegal.

      As we can see, only selective enforcement of this law will keep it around for even a short period of time. But, eventually, more and more draconian enforement will follow, and people will tire of such laws - and all this provided it doesn't fail in a real test in the courts. Something like Felton et al.

      Cheers!

    48. Re:Confused editor by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
      Hollingsworth is submitting a bill ...

      Silly okvol, you should know there's no worth in Hollings (D, Disney).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    49. Re:Confused editor by roybadami · · Score: 1

      It was designed to break copy protection, which is a no-no according to the DMCA, whether you really have a right to copy lit or not.

      Indeed it is. It was illegal, no question, under that bad piece of legislation, the DMCA. But piracy (to the best of my knowledge) is not a legal term. And copying something within fair use rights would not be described as piracy by most reasonably people, whether or not it involved defeating a technological protection device, and whether or not it was therefore legal.

      So, I stand by my statement. The parent post was FUD, because the way I read it, it implied that the only purpose of Sklyarov's e-book reader was to infringe copyright. It was not.
    50. Re:Confused editor by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% - his post was complete FUD.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  13. Are news sites all in violation of DMCA now? by baboin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If 2600 couldn't even link to sites offering DeCSS downloads, does the DMCA also prohibit news sites and Slashdot from even mentioning that markers can defeat Sony's CD copy protection mechanism? Whoops, did I just incriminate myself?

    1. Re:Are news sites all in violation of DMCA now? by Target+Drone · · Score: 1
      IANAL so I don't know what the answer is. This seems to be similar to the Felten case. As you may recall Felten was pressured by the RIAA not to present his findings on SDMI. Eventually the RIAA backed down though. Personally I think the RIAA backed down because he was a Princeton professor and because they were getting a lot of bad press. I think they could have gone through with the law suit if they wanted to. Whether or not they would have won is another matter. Unfortunately it seems like in today's day and age corporation can get their way through threats of a law suit.

      For this particular case I think that Slashdot and the major news sites will not get sued. Because they aren't giving people exact instructions and because they have enough money to stand up for themselves. I do think it's possible that some kid who creates a website with explicit instructions complete with pictures of how to circumvent the protection could get sued or at least get a cease and desist order. IANAL so I don't know if this kid would be breaking the law but I suspect he would be though. I do know that the threat of a law suit would be enough to force him to take down the web site.

    2. Re:Are news sites all in violation of DMCA now? by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

      It is highly doubtful that any of the major news sites will get sued for this. This might be a good thing though.

      While not actually precedent setting in the usual sense, people who might be charged in the future for DMCA violations could point to this type of story and the related lack of action as part of their defence.

      Now I know you can't use "the other guy was speeding and he wasn't pulled over" as an excuse for breaking the law, but in this case you could say that "the other guy was going just as fast as I was, and he wasn't pulled over, and furthermore, think about how silly it would have been if he had been, so clearly I wasn't speeding either." There's probably a good legal way of saying this.

      Also, "Your honor, this suit is clearly frivolous, if you decide to hear this case, then they could just as easily sue CNN for posting this story, and Sharpie for making these pens. Clearly this is not want the drafters of this law intended [and/or this would clearly violate other laws/rights]."

      IANAL but I think that analogies like felt pens and post-it notes should be used in any future DMCA copy circumvention case even if all it does is plant a bit of doubt in a judge or jury. Preferably a real lawyer could find a way to make a legal point that sticks.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    3. Re:Are news sites all in violation of DMCA now? by detritus. · · Score: 1

      Maybe 2600 should publish all their issues concerning DeCSS with a felt-tip marker.

    4. Re:Are news sites all in violation of DMCA now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2600 case prevented them from linking to code under the rationale that code does not enjoy all the first amendment protections of speech.

      Written English does however enjoy these protections. Which of course is why SDMI backed down from the Felten thing--which, if you remember, was a case he brought to strike the DMCA down due to a chilling effect on--wait for it--free speech. Bowing out of the conference was a move designed to create an actual example of chilling effect.

    5. Re:Are news sites all in violation of DMCA now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whoops, did I just incriminate myself?"

      No, but it would now be illegal to link to OfficeMax. :+>

  14. Get ready for the penless society by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Now that felt-tip pens are a copyright protection circumvention tool, the mere discussion of pens is now a DMCA violation. Heaven help the people who are "trafficing" in this "contraband". How are they going to find enough prison space for all those OfficeMax and Staples employees?

  15. So if I draw I am a criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I draw on my CD I am a criminal?

    Err.. I guess it really isn't 'my' cd now is it...

    I am just leasing it....

  16. When will they learn... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

    Haha, it's always a matter of time before someone figures out how to beat any copy protection. When will they learn? Now, I wonder if Sony will keep this ridiculous copy protection scheme now that it's beat...

    1. Re:When will they learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who has used a computer for any amount of time should have known this would come. The way I see it, on one side you have a group of Sony's copy protection people, building the technology because that's what they're paid to do, and because some executive thinks the "filthy communists" will eat into his 7-figure salary by making a copy of the latest music. On the other side, you have EVERY SINGLE HACKER AND CRACKER IN THE WORLD, many of whom are much more talented than whoever Sony has working for them, who do it on their own time, for nothing, because of (among other things) intellectual curiosity. Now you tell me, which side do you think will win?

  17. DMCA markers by dmanny · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a surprise announcement today the justice department attempted to release the details of "Operation Sharpie" in which all felt tip markers are to be confiscated. The press conference ended prematurely when a SWAT team crashed in and siezed the whiteboard and all other presentation materials as evidence.

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    1. Re:DMCA markers by GMontag · · Score: 2

      The Congress moved swiftly to a joint emergency session!

      Topic: "circumvention device" registration and licensing to protect the children.

  18. Gotta love it by cmay666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just love the low tech solution to their high falootin attempt to screw us. There's gotta be a lot of RIAA people pulling their hair out the last couple weeks. :)

    1. Re:Gotta love it by Uncommon+Troll · · Score: 0

      A famous Englishman once said, "The more complex the system the more susceptible it is to primitive attack."

      Or something like that

      --
      My real account keeps getting labeled as a troll...
    2. Re:Gotta love it by Hecubas · · Score: 1

      And that's how the Ewoks beat the Empire on Endor!

      Go Ewoks!!

      --
      Hecubas
    3. Re:Gotta love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, and i hope they spent millions on this! LMAO!!!

  19. NFNSTM? by Mattygfunk · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Taco doesn't want to see this story in the submission bin so he lets everyone else see it on the front page.


    Good thinking champ.

    1. Re:NFNSTM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roofles, friend. Mod up!

  20. Remember Dongles? by DavidpFitz · · Score: 2

    Remember those dongles you had to put on your parallel port to get AutoCAD to work? Well, I remember getting around that (not actually the AutoCAD one, was for another app) by copying the circuitry inside the dongle... it was really simple, just a couple of wires looping back. Does this mean a soldering iron is illegal? What about the circuit board, or the wire? Or what if I employed someone else to do it? Are they themselves illegal (how does that work!?) since I'm just using them as a tool.

    And, if the copy protection is so lame that it's trivial to break, doesn't that mean that general purpose things can be used to break the protection, and that's just mad. Think of password protected software... is a dictionary illegal since I might try to type in every word in it to gain access so I can copy it.

    Stop the madness!!!

    1. Re:Remember Dongles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only difference is that there was no DMCA back then.

    2. Re:Remember Dongles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AutoCAD? Don't you mean MicroStation? I've never even seen one for ACAD, and I've been using it for 10+ years! Though I stopped upgrading around Release 12, not sure what it'd cost to upgrade anymore.

  21. So... by jsse · · Score: 0, Redundant

    if we don't stop you'll post it again next week?...

  22. Back in my day by unformed · · Score: 5, Funny

    We used felt tip markers to get high. Damn these kids with their fancy gadgets and such.

  23. but by paradesign · · Score: 1

    will the people who buy these cds be learned enough to do this? i think not!

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming there was no shoplifting, the person who discovered it was learned enough.

      Don't bother coming up with loopholes around my statement (the CD may have been a gift, etc.) my point still stands.

    2. Re:but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you mean, "learned enough"? its a fucking felt-tip pen. that's the whole point of the story,that anyone can do it.

  24. Has anyone actually proven this? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone actually been able to prove that this works? I'm not talking about anecdotal evidence, I mean, has any geek with /.'s general communal respect actually taken a stack of CDs, tried to rip them, gotten errors, marked the CDs up, and then got them to rip with no errors?

    And then documented the crap out of it?

    This all smells too much like the audiophile tricks of the 80's where coloring the outside rim of a CD was supposed to "trap stray laser radiation and improve the [clarity | transparency | imaging | other-nonsense-claptrap] of the music." (see the snopes entry on this one).

    I ask because I'm really curious what the scientific explanation for this would be. It was my understanding that they (the infamous "they") did something to the actual track of the CD, with bad physical spacing, introduced errors, or something like that, but did it *throughout* the CD. How on earth would marking the inside of the CD fix that?

    [okay, I just actually *read* the article. :) But I'd swear that an earlier posting talked about marking the inside, not outside, of the CD. Anyway, my question still holds -- any geek-written report on this, or do we only have the mainstream press to trust as to whether this actually works, and for which CDs?]

    1. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Informative

      The explanation is simple.

      The "copy protection" is simply a means of preventing the discs from working in a PC. This is done by putting a phony "data" track on the outer rim of the disc. It's visibly seperated from the rest of the information on the disc by small ring between the data and audio sections. An audio CD player will never access this track, but a PC CD-ROM drive will always try to read the data tracks first -- since it can't read the data track it regards the CD as non-working and you won't be able to play it. Using a sharpie on the outer rim (from what I understand you make a diagonal mark along the data track that runs tangent to the seperator for the audio track, but does not actually mark over the audio tracks) you block out the data track, and as such the drive won't read it.

      Reuters picked up the story and said that they tried it with success on the known Celine Dion non-CD.

    2. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is going to admit to owning a Celine Dion CD, so all you'll hear is "MY friend was able to do it..."

    3. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by proj_2501 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Anyway, my question still holds -- any geek-written report on this, or do we only have the mainstream press to trust as to whether this
      actually works, and for which CDs?



      why don't you try it yourself?



      And what the heck is this "geek-written" vs. "mainstream" business? Did Mahir Cagri not show that everything on the Internet is mainstream?

    4. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by tdemark · · Score: 1

      The "copy protection" is a data track of gibberish after the "real" music. When the CD is inserted in the computer, it will try and read the data track and get only gibberish. Causing the machine to not read any more data on the CD itself.

      By blacking out the track itself, you effectively remove the track so the computer cannot even attempt to access it. Most computers will then ignore the track, allowing the audio data to be read.

      - Tony

    5. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you take a look at a copy protected cd you can see two sessions seperated by some mm of space. one (the outer one) is broken, when you saw it of or make it unreadable the cd drive wont hang your (windows operated ?) pc.

    6. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      so basically, you fool the CDROM into thinking the disc is like those rounded off credit-card size CDs they give away at trade shows.

      i guess a good question to ask is how much black is enough? if we go too far do we block out actual music? If we do, then can Windex and some elbow grease clean the black off so we can try again? Will some markers be able to be cleaned off?

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    7. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To re-copy protect your disc try acetone. :-)

    8. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by ipmcc · · Score: 5, Funny

      The proper procedure for dealing with Celine Dion non-CDs in particular is to color in the entire CD with the marker. This not only defeats the copy protection but prevents the CD from ever being played in any player, which is what's best for society anyway.

      --
      This too shall pass.
    9. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by gid · · Score: 2

      I saw that blurb about Reuters trying it, and I don't know what's worse: The cd copy prevention which probably took millions to develop and test getting cracked with a fucking magic marker that somone found in a drawer in between a gummy eraser and a "bop-it" pen... or that Reuters admitted to buying a Celine Dion CD.



      Damn... that whole joke just came off as lame, maybe a bit too contrived, oh well... it woulda been funnier had I told it. You gotta have respect for humor writers, it's tough to do and actually be funny.

    10. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by spiral · · Score: 2

      > why don't you try it yourself?

      The cause may be good, but not good enough to justify owning a Celine Dion album.

      --
      Drinking will help us plan!
    11. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a good question to ask is how much black is enough?"


      One drop of blood is all it takes.
      Of course, you need at least 1/8 to get the funk.

    12. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > any geek-written report on this

      Are you actually telling a slashdotter to go and _buy_ a Celin Dion CD?

      In other news: Celin Dion celebrated record sales of her CD, oblivious to the fact the all the people buying it were just interested in testing out the felt-tip marker encryption theory...

    13. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried it with a Sony Key2Audio (www.key2audio.com) protected CD (Silicone Soul - ... a soul thing) and it worked perfectly. Tried it with a StarForce (http://www.star-force.com/) protected CD (ATB - Dedicated) and it did not work although StarForce also uses corrupt outer rings on the CD to fool CD-ROMs.

    14. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      The music is recorded from the inside out, unlike a record, it should be obvious where the music starts, then there would be (hopefully) a ring of unused space, then there would be more recorded on the outer ring.

      The only problem I can see is if it's a LONG CD, the music data might be physically very close to the bogus data. Then you might run into problems.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    15. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgot to mention that the pen I used was a "edding 8400 cd marker" but I guess they did not call it "cd marker" because of these new possibilities :))). Also if you make a mistake "painting" your CD you can remove the ink using alcohol. No risk at all.

    16. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by johnpg · · Score: 1

      I agree with this guy. I know Reuters says they tried it, but that's not good enough, I want proof. I agree that it's possible it may work since it's the DATA not audio tracks that are the issue, but like this guy said, it sounds a lot like the "green ink makes your CD's sound better" crap.

      I'm not saying it ISN'T true, but I hardly think it's worth all this press and attention until it's been documented properly. Wouldn't we all look like morons if it was all some huge practical joke? :-)

    17. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by new+death+barbie · · Score: 1

      Reuters picked up the story and said that they tried it with success on the known Celine Dion non-CD.


      Oh my god...are you telling me that any lunatic with a marker could take my shiny coasters and make them play CELINE DION????


      For heaven's sake people, please, think of the children! STOP THE MADNESS!

      --

      It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

    18. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by roybadami · · Score: 1

      I agree with this guy. I know Reuters says they tried it, but that's not good enough, I want proof. I agree that it's possible it may work since it's the DATA not audio tracks that are the issue, but like this guy said, it sounds a lot like the "green ink makes your CD's sound better" crap.


      It sounds pretty plausible.

      Almost certainly, the CD is a multisession disc. The first session is audio, and the second session is corrupt.

      Audio CD players only look at the first session; however a PC will look for CD-ROM content in the last session, and get confused by the corrupt session.[1]

      All you need to do is to render the second session unreadable, by obscuring it in some way; then the PC will just see a normal single-session audio disc.

      This sounds like it is really just a variant of the CD Extra format. CD Extra is sometimes used to place additional CD-ROM content on an audio disc. By placing the CD-ROM content in the second session, they avoid confusing audio players with it.
    19. Re:Has anyone actually proven this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you

  25. oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye Bye felt tips

  26. alt.music.what? by MrHat · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I wonder what type of copy protection will come next?" one posting on alt.music.prince read. "Maybe they'll ban markers."

    Maybe they'll just ban Prince. I think that would be one use of the DMCA that we could all approve of.

    Ok, ok. Kidding. I know: DMCA evil. You guys are right. Now move along.

  27. What about the green magic markers? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you use the black marker to defeat the copy protection, can you still use the green magic marker to make it sound better? And will that improve the sound of your MP3s?

    1. Re:What about the green magic markers? by KLP2 · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how a green magic marker (or any other marker) would make CELINE F***ING DION sound better.

    2. Re:What about the green magic markers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, ya got a point there. If only we could let her be a space tourist, let an airlock mishap occur and eject her into the nice hard vacuum of space. That would shut her up on so many levels.

    3. Re:What about the green magic markers? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      This raises a more important point. Why would anyone buy the album in the first place and then why try and copy it? Does anybody really think Celine Dion fans are the type to get on the internet and download her album?

    4. Re:What about the green magic markers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing - not even a green marker could make celine dion sound better.

    5. Re:What about the green magic markers? by Kredal · · Score: 1

      In space, no one can hear you sing.

      No wait, that's not quite right. hmmm.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  28. You can have my Sharpie when... by chris_martin · · Score: 2, Funny

    You pry it out of my cold dead hand.

    Or...

    When Sharpies are outlawed, only outlaws will have Sharpies

    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
    1. Re:You can have my Sharpie when... by qslack · · Score: 2

      Sharpies don't defeat copy prevention, people defeat copy prevention.

    2. Re:You can have my Sharpie when... by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      So will people next be outlawed under the DMCA?

      What about brains? I might use my brain to think up a new way to defeat copy protection. I guess I'll just have to report to the nearest re-education center to have that fixed.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    3. Re:You can have my Sharpie when... by wolf- · · Score: 1

      Think of the Children!

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    4. Re:You can have my Sharpie when... by Strog · · Score: 1

      I'd be too scared of having my brain confiscated. It's real hard to fight it without a brain.

    5. Re:You can have my Sharpie when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can lead a horse to Unix but you can't make him log into a shell.

      Sure you can. Just threaten to shoot the puppy.

  29. I have a marker by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    come over to my house and I will set your c.d.s free.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  30. I don't need a felt pen by mirko · · Score: 1

    My Acorn RiscPC has actually a CD driver that shows me each of the disc's sessions as a separate disc drive...
    It just won't accept to open the Sony buggy track :-)

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  31. Digital Media by EvictedHellCitizen · · Score: 1

    It seems that a new model has developed. File sharing cannot be defeated entirely, and I believe the entertainment companies know this. They seek to "niche" the number of file-swappers by making it increasingly difficult to rip and download music, apps, etc. The irony is that proliferation of media still occurs because one person devises a method to circumvent copy protection, and then uses the internet to not spread the media itself, but more the knowledge on how to unlock and spread the media.

  32. Subtle Motive by ltsmash · · Score: 1

    It's unbelievable that the people who designed the copy protection are so stupid that it could be hacked by a 2 year old (literally). There has to be a subtle motive involved.

  33. Be careful... by YanceyAI · · Score: 1

    ..because posting this story twice may make the MPAA and RIAA think you're trying to promote circumvention. I mean isn't posting a link to this story essentially the same thing as linking to DeCSS?

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  34. Someone needs to follow through on this... by Phleg · · Score: 1

    ...and sue Sanford for making felt-tipped pens. Push for a ban of all marking devices. Run with it. It's things like this that will get the DMCA repealed.

    --
    No comment.
  35. I will be rich by gato_mato · · Score: 0

    I can see my "Sharpie" common stock rising in value on the DJIA as I type....Im am rich!!!

  36. DMCA jokes by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Call me crazy, but I'm getting tired of all 30 billion variations of "OMG! A paperclip is an illegal copy protection circumvention device because I can use it to poke out the eye of the person who makes the CDs, causing him to go to the hospital when he's supposed to be putting on the security track."

    At this point, I long for the days of trolls posting haikus about a petrified Natalie Portman slathered in hot grits driving the Slashdot Cruiser over to a Beowulf cluster. At least those posts tended to get appopriately modded down as trolls rather than modded up as both insightful and funny.

    The DMCA circumvention device joke has been made. Several times. Stop mindlessly repeating it like you're Raymond going through the Who's On First routine. Besides, I hear Amazon.com has a patent on the business model of mindlessly repeating a joke.

    (I apologize for cluttering up the comments with meta-discussion, but I felt the point needed to be made. Also, since this is just a repost, most important points have already been made.)

    1. Re:DMCA jokes by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      I hear ya man, it's like how radio stations play a good song to death.

    2. Re:DMCA jokes by alexjohns · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      The Slashdot Cruiser. Wow, I'd forgotten about that. I remember entering that contest. Who won that damn thing? And what did they do with it? Will a search find the answer?

      Yeah, it's off-topic. If I didn't occasionally drop my karma down to 48, I wouldn't have anything to live for.

    3. Re:DMCA jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "OMG! A paperclip is an illegal copy protection circumvention device because I can use it to poke out the eye of the person who makes the CDs, causing him to go to the hospital when he's supposed to be putting on the security track."
      Funniest thing on Slashdot in some time...
      Well done sir.

    4. Re:DMCA jokes by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

      ok how about..

      One Beowulf cluster of DMCA circumvention devices to rule them all, one Beowulf cluster of DMCA circumvention devices to find them, one one Beowulf cluster of DMCA circumvention devices to bring them all, and a first post to bind them!

      ...amen

    5. Re:DMCA jokes by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      You're talking to the crowd that thinks it's funny to have "Cowboy Neal" at the end of every poll.

    6. Re:DMCA jokes by kylus · · Score: 1

      "The DMCA circumvention device joke has been made. Several times. Stop mindlessly repeating it like you're Raymond going through the Who's On First routine."

      Frankly, I think the point of all the jokes is to show what a ridiculous piece of legislation the DMCA actually is. Perhaps the more it's pointed out--humorously or otherwise--then perhaps more people will wake up and look at the damage it has done in the past and get them thinking about what could happen in the future if crappy legislation like this is allowed to stand. Yeah the jokes are old, but since the damn law just won't seem to go away despite the obvious problems with it, why should the jokes that point out its flaws?

      --
      --Kylus
      Idiot-proof something, and Life will build a better Idiot.
    7. Re:DMCA jokes by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      All your Beowulf
      and D.M.C.A Haikus
      ...are belong to us.

    8. Re:DMCA jokes by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
      Natalie Portman
      slathered in hot grits driving
      the Slashdot Cruiser.

      Beowulf cluster
      imagining it is a
      Black Sharpie Marker.

      The DMCA
      circumvented by markers
      Sony weeps openly.

      Haiku just for you
      all insightful and funny
      Slashdot is ok.

    9. Re:DMCA jokes by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1
      "Frankly, I think the point of all the jokes is to show what a ridiculous piece of legislation the DMCA actually is."

      I agree it's ridiculous. I don't have a problem with people pointing out that it's ridiculous. I do have a problem with every single discussion that even tangentially touches the subject of copyright getting hit with a barrage of the exact same joke over and over and over.

    10. Re:DMCA jokes by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1

      At least the Cowboy Neal thing is limited to once per poll. The DMCA joke thing is several times per story.

    11. Re:DMCA jokes by goodviking · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I long for the days of trolls posting haikus about a petrified Natalie Portman slathered in hot grits ...

      Ok, just for you:

      Natalie Portman
      Nice in Star Wars black leather
      But sadly no grits

    12. Re:DMCA jokes by 2RockStars · · Score: 1

      pretty kick-ass, but "Sony weeps openly" is 6!

    13. Re:DMCA jokes by Maserati · · Score: 2
      Funniest. Haiku. Post. Ever.


      I think we're done with gratuitous haiku for a while. But it's been nice to see poetry in use.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    14. Re:DMCA jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amen, brother. What really pisses me off are the idiots who think they know what the DMCA prohibits, but actually have no fucking clue what they're talking about. You know the ones I'm talking about; they say things like:
      <voice style="voice-family: bill-gates, whiny;">
      Ohh, isn't that a violation of the DCMA? I bet it's a violation of the DCMA, because it's reverse-engineering, so it must be a violation of the DCMA. Ha ha! I'm feeling so very very clever today that I think I'll make a joke about it even though I have no clue what the hell I'm talking about! Aren't I oh so funny and clever? Ha ha!</voice>
      and you can't get them to read the bloody bill because, even though they can write code in 7 different languages on 3 platforms, the legalese is just tooo haard for them, kind of like reading the fucking articles, getting the words then/than, there/their/they're, and to/too straight, remembering that it's "DMCA," not "DCMA," not ending plurals with -'s, remembering that possessive its has no fucking apostrophe, keeping the RIAA and MPAA straight, proofreading, writing to elected representatives, and holding a discussion about copyright law without turning it into another bloody debate about gun control and/or invoking Godwin's Law.

      Bloody hell. It's enough to make an American use British expletives.

      And yes, I would like some cheese with that whine.

  37. Slashdot is guilty by tweakt · · Score: 2

    of violating the DMCA. It's illegal to spread information on how copy protection systems can be circumvented. Just ask Dmitry...

  38. They can take my sharpie... by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    ...from my cold dead fingers!

    I don't care one whit for what kind of obnoxious copy protection they shove up Celene Dion's... music, but if the DMCA wants my sharpie, they'll need to bring the National Guard!

  39. apathetic journalism 101 by augros · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is classic. this article is really about how the editors hate our story submissions, and how they really don't care about the news anymore. but that's nothing new either. so it's a double repeat!

    1. Re:apathetic journalism 101 by Glanz · · Score: 1

      And for some, unfortunately, (present company excepted) it's like blowing wind!! :)

      --
      Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
    2. Re:apathetic journalism 101 by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      so go away

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:apathetic journalism 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They not only hate our story submissions, they hate us, too!

    4. Re:apathetic journalism 101 by augros · · Score: 1

      sounds like someone hasn't encountered his "Personal CmdrTaco Saviour". He loves us all, do not love faith, my son.

  40. Yes I have by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    and I have many markers. Come on by and we'll set your c.d.s free.

    I have successfully burned 1000 copies of The Fast and the Furious soundtrack already.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Yes I have by NickRob · · Score: 1

      I have successfully burned 1000 copies of The Fast and the Furious soundtrack already.

      I hope you mean the 2nd soundtrack- the first one was not protected at all.

  41. Confession. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we all know what the DMCA says about tools for circumventing copy protection.

    I'm a married man but last week I committed a sin: I took the DMCA into a back alley and let the b*tch go down on me.
    Now as bad as that may sound it gets worse, I think I may go back for more this week because the DMCA swallows!

    :)

  42. Taco: Here's How to Solve Your Problem by omnirealm · · Score: 2


    I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions from people who didn't read Slashdot on May 13

    Taco, sounds like you have a problem here. One solution is to post a duplicate story. Allow me to suggest an alternative.

    void processSubmission( char* submissionString, char* toExclude[], int toExcludeLength ) {

    int x;

    for( x = 0; x < toExcludeLength; x++ ) {
    if( strstr( submissionString, toExclude[x] ) ) {
    return;
    }
    }

    askTaco( submissionString );

    }

    Of course, if you need a little more power, there's always regex.

    --
    An unjust law is no law at all. - St. Augustine
    1. Re:Taco: Here's How to Solve Your Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's not a bad idea.

      If an article was a near match to another article that was already posted, it would just be automatically deleted.

    2. Re:Taco: Here's How to Solve Your Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is written in Perl, not C.

    3. Re:Taco: Here's How to Solve Your Problem by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      dude, perl isn't a structured well-written language. if you want to write perl, you need to know a lot about making your code spaghetti like with plenty of meat filled pasta sauce...

    4. Re:Taco: Here's How to Solve Your Problem by omnirealm · · Score: 2

      Slashdot is written in Perl, not C.

      That's an entirely different problem that needs addressing...

      --
      An unjust law is no law at all. - St. Augustine
  43. my letter to the RIAA by nlabadie · · Score: 1

    Comments/questions/etc can be made here.

    Subject: Copyright

    I recently read an article describing how an unscrupulous individual could use a felt-tip marker to defeat the copyright protection on a CD. Being an artist, I have a large number of felt-tip markers in my possession. Do I risk being sued under the DMCA for being in possession of a device for circumventing copyright protection? What if I lend one to a friend? Is this considered distributing a device for circumventing copyright protection? I'd appreciate an answer on this... I want nothing more than to be an upstanding citizen.

    Sincerely,
    Nathan Labadie

  44. "Not technically a CD" by flipflapflopflup · · Score: 2
    In an article (on Apples' website) linked to from the previous posting of this story, it was stated that such copy-protected cds aren't technically or legally CDs.

    Therefore, shouldn't there sales be discounted from the CD charts?

    1. Re:"Not technically a CD" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but their sales should be.

  45. Is Charlton Heston by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    your president too?

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  46. uhm by waspleg · · Score: 1

    well.. I just did an install of OpenBSD 3.1 last night and the ports tree as well as the pre-compiled packages found on the openbsd.org ftp server includes both the DeCSS source and binary

    so if 2600 can get in trouble for just linking to the code under the DMCA, i wonder what would happen to Theo for distributing it (along with all the openbsd mirrors there are out there)

    yes this is mildly offtopic, but i found it interesting and worthy of being shared, if you disagree comment, dont' moderate

    1. Re:uhm by waspleg · · Score: 1

      nevermind, i installed the package and checked some of the resulting docs, some cocksucker called his program to take css out of an html file DeCSS to be a publicity whore, my mistake, sorry for whatever inconvenience reading my post caused you ;P

    2. Re:uhm by Maserati · · Score: 1

      It's working !

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  47. Read the DMCA by Royster · · Score: 5, Informative
    Right here.

    Specifically:
    Title 17, Section 1201(a)
    (2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that -
    (A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
    (B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
    (C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.


    Felt tip markers are not primarially designed to circumvent access controls. Felt tip markers have lots of commercially significant purposes other than circumvention.

    But, if you marketed a felt tip pen with the name CD Rip (TM) brand felt tip pens and included instructions for how to circumvent CD protection than you should expect a C&D letter.

    It's the same situation as the fellow who's program unset the true type embedded bits and a generic hex editor. The first tool has one purpose, to twiddle embedding bits. The second tool has lots of commercially significant purposes many unrelated to any kind of circumvention.
    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:Read the DMCA by Triskaidekaphobia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does the logic in laws work?

      I see there is an "or" between (B) and (C), but nothing between (A) and (B). Can I assume the absence of an operator implies "and".

      If so, which takes precedence?

      Is it ( A and B) or C

      or A and (B or C) ?

    2. Re:Read the DMCA by rsidd · · Score: 2
      (B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;


      The RIAA estimates "piracy" losses at $300 million a year or more. I'm not sure, but I suspect this could be a larger number than the market for felt-tip markers for "other" purposes. Admittedly, the other two conditions (A) and (C) above are probably not applicable, but this one could be (stupider judgements have been made) and it's an "or" clause.

    3. Re:Read the DMCA by First+Person · · Score: 2

      It's A and (B or C).

      --
      Given one hour to live, the student replied: "I'd spend it with professor FP who can make an hour seem like a lifetime."
    4. Re:Read the DMCA by Royster · · Score: 1

      Read it as (A), (B), or (C). There's no and involved.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    5. Re:Read the DMCA by L1nUx+h4x0r · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah...it's called "English".

      Ready, lets get rid of the bullets and read the sentences together.
      Title 17, Section 1201(a)
      (2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.
      No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

      You see why they seperate it like they do now, huh?

      If you got lost trying to read it together, it's this: (2)+(A) = first clause ";" (2)+(B)+(C) = second clause.

      --
      The GPL makes software more like your mom. Free and open to all.
    6. Re:Read the DMCA by Royster · · Score: 1

      They are not losing $300M/year due to felt tipped pens. Felt tipped pens have tons of ordinary uses pretty much anywhere an ordinary pen might be used. I wouldn't be surprised if the felt pen market exceeded $300M/year.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    7. Re:Read the DMCA by mph · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it's in English. It basically says (A); (B); or (C). In English, when there's a list of things subject to an "and" or "or" operator, we put the things in a comma- or semicolon-separated list and put the operator before the last item. "Bob, Joe, and Fred went to the movies." "Do you want the chicken, beef, or spam?"

    8. Re:Read the DMCA by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But, if you marketed a felt tip pen with the name CD Rip (TM) brand felt tip pens and included instructions for how to circumvent CD protection than you should expect a C&D letter.

      It's the same situation as the fellow who's program unset the true type embedded bits...

      IMHO, it's very interesting that you brought these two things up together.

      One of the factors that made the "embed" author clearly safe from DMCA infringement, was that he owned some fonts that needed their bits fixed. By the definitions within DMCA, you can only be engaging in "circumvention" if you don't have "authorization" (presumably from the copyright owner) and since he obviously authorized people to use his tool on his fonts, it's primary purpose was not to circumvent. Yes, it's primary purpose was to unset the bits. But that isn't circumvention, because having authorization causes the act to not be circumvention. Yes, I'm being pedantic about the definitions, but hey, that's what the DMCA text says.

      In the DeCSS case, nobody who was friendly to DeCSS, happened to also own the copyright on a CSS-protected DVD. The only entities who owned CSS-protected works were the MPAA. Thus, MPAA had a case for claiming that no one had been authorized (ignoring the implicit authorization that comes with selling someone a DVD -- Kaplan was very MPAA-friendly). Thus, this point didn't really come up (but it would have, if someone friendly to DeCSS had managed to create a CSS-protected DVD).

      So in light of all that, let's not forget something: if the copyright owner of even one of these "protected" CDs decides to authorize people to use markers in order to play their CD, then even CD Rip(TM) brand markers will become legal. The marker's primary marketed purpose will be to defeat the protection, but this activity will not be the same as "circumvention" as defined by DMCA.

      There are a lot of musicians. The rest can be inferred by the reader. :-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    9. Re:Read the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laws are written in English? Don't be silly, if that were true then millions of lawyers would be out of work.
      The primary purpose of lawyers is to translate the law from legalese to English for the rest of us.

    10. Re:Read the DMCA by Software · · Score: 1
      I liked your post. Only two major problems:
      But, if you marketed a felt tip pen with the name CD Rip (TM) brand felt tip pens and included instructions for how to circumvent CD protection than you should expect a C&D letter.
      No, you should expect to get arrested (if you're a Russian national). The DMCA is a criminal statue, not a civil one.
      There are a lot of musicians. The rest can be inferred by the reader. :-)
      OK, I follow you here, but note that musicians usually do not usually own the copyright to "their" works. Although I suppose it's possible that an independent musician could make an arrangement with the CD fair-use prevention technology folks, etc. Somehow, I doubt that this would help; the **AA would still complain, and the Justice Department would pull their agents off of counter-terrorism in order to investigate. Then it becomes a question of, "How much justice can this indepedent musician afford?"
    11. Re:Read the DMCA by dcgaber · · Score: 2

      I think the key here is also that the (B) "effectively controls access". By definition, a control that be circumvented by a .99 pen and no special skill is not much of an effective control.

      As nice as it would be to use this to show the DMCA for the sham it truly is, this is not going to be the test case.

      I would note that putting recording celine dion and putting her voice on a CD is a MUCH better effective control for protecting that work. I mean, I would never want to listen to that, much less put it on my HD or copy it...would you?

    12. Re:Read the DMCA by detritus. · · Score: 1

      But, if you marketed a felt tip pen with the name CD Rip (TM) brand felt tip pens and included instructions for how to circumvent CD protection than you should expect a C&D letter.

      This kind of reminds me of how brass knuckles are sold legally(?) in catalogs by marketing them as
      paperweights.

    13. Re:Read the DMCA by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      > No, you should expect to get arrested (if you're a Russian national). The DMCA is a criminal statue, not a civil one.

      I believe criminal penalties only apply if you sell the circumvention device, or circumvent for money. Check out 17 USC 1202 and 17 USC 1203.

      > OK, I follow you here, but note that musicians usually do not usually own the copyright to "their" works.

      What? Typically a musician who is not on a "major" label and who writes his own material owns the copyright to his work. If you don't think there are lots of these musicians, check out the bagillions on mp3.com, just for an example.

      (However, I do agree that it is unlikely someone would want to license CD protection and then tell people that they are free to bypass it. Should these copy-protections become "standard" though, well, who knows...)

    14. Re:Read the DMCA by eyeball · · Score: 2

      Felt tip markers are not primarially designed to circumvent access controls. Felt tip markers have lots of commercially significant purposes other than circumvention.

      So that begs the question, how would the courts (or lawyers) prove that DeCSS's primary purpose is to circumvent copyright. What if the developers developed it for some other purpose, and it (tongue in cheek) just happened to circumvent dvd copy protection?

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    15. Re:Read the DMCA by tadas · · Score: 1

      I think the key here is also that the (B) "effectively controls access". By definition, a control that be circumvented by a .99 pen and no special skill is not much of an effective control.


      Where do you get them for .99? I have to pay at least $1.89 for mine?

      --
      This page accidentally left blank
    16. Re:Read the DMCA by L1nUx+h4x0r · · Score: 0

      Actually, have you read the US Code? It's not that bad. Lawyers are paid to translate that into "legalease" in order to intimidate the others.

      They take:
      "Title 17, Copyright, Section 1001, ..."
      and make it:

      "As perscribed by US Code 1001..."

      --
      The GPL makes software more like your mom. Free and open to all.
    17. Re:Read the DMCA by VB · · Score: 1


      I think you've finally solved the copy-protection dilemma:
      WARNING: This CD Media Contains Audio Recordings of Celine Dion. Use at Your Own Risk!

      I know wouldn't rip it....

      --
      www.dedserius.com
      VB != VisualBasic
    18. Re:Read the DMCA by cthugha · · Score: 2

      The conjunction used between the second-last and last sub-paras is read back as applying to all other alternatives. So it is A or B or C in this case.

    19. Re:Read the DMCA by Software · · Score: 1
      I believe criminal penalties only apply if you sell the circumvention device
      Yes, but the original post was "if you marketed a felt tip pen".

      I think we're probably both right about the musicians-owning-copyright thing. I'm right if one counts the $ of music sold, and you're right if one counts the # of musicians. Or perhaps my judgment of the popularity major label music is incorrect.

  48. Except that in many cases it's true... by Dimensio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The DMCA was used to smack-down 2600.com for simply linking to a copy circumvention device (DeCSS) -- they were successfully prosecuted for providing information on copy protection circumvention devices even though they did not distribute the device or engage in the circumvention themselves.

    While Sharpie markers are not likely to be outlawed since they have known legitimate functions (whereas making a non-CD workin your computer is illegal), giving information on how to use a Sharpie marker to circumvent a copy protection device probably is illegal. That's the absurdity of the law and proof that the legislators responsible for the piece of filth known as the DMCA deserve to be shot. And stabbed. And beaten. And boiled. And whipped. And drawn and quartered.

    1. Re:Except that in many cases it's true... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      "giving information on how to use a Sharpie marker to circumvent a copy protection device probably is illegal."

      That's a good point, as it does bear some close resemblance to the Dmitry case. Unfortunately, that point is getting lost amidst dozens of people going on about Staples getting sued for distributing circumvention devices.

      I'm not against people raising a legitimate issue. I'm just tired of people making the same cookie cutter DMCA joke (not even jokes, since they're all really the same joke).

    2. Re:Except that in many cases it's true... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      That's the absurdity of the law and proof that the legislators responsible for the piece of filth known as the DMCA deserve to be shot. And stabbed. And beaten. And boiled. And whipped. And drawn and quartered.

      And only then given a fair trial and taken out and hanged by the neck until death.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Except that in many cases it's true... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      ...the legislators responsible for the piece of filth known as the DMCA deserve to be shot. And stabbed. And beaten. And boiled. And whipped. And drawn and quartered.

      You are being too kind to them. I admit that I would be reluctant to use even those gentle measures in person. But I sure wouldn't weep if worse happened to them. Personally I consider each and every one of them false to their oaths of office, and traitors to the country. I don't consider that they were taking bribes is any kind of a defense at all. And if they call it "accepting favors from a lobbyist", they just make it worse ... they don't even show any remorse.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Except that in many cases it's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's the absurdity of the law and proof that the legislators responsible for the piece of filth known as the DMCA deserve to be shot. And stabbed. And beaten. And boiled. And whipped. And drawn and quartered."

      Come on now, tell us how you really feel.

    5. Re:Except that in many cases it's true... by slaida1 · · Score: 1

      Could you send me few gibs and ribs of a legistlator for my new DoomIII themed interior decorations?

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  49. Jobs by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised that the tech industry, especially slashdot isn't taking proper advantage of the current situation. Shame on you, just think of all the jobs around at the moment to develop copy-protection/drm systems - no, obviously im not saying you should actually try and develop a good system (if thats even possible) what im saying is that you could work for these companies and produce equally bad systems and make lots of money. not only that, but you could purposely build in back doors. These companies simply must understand that they are inferior, stupid people, and we are all laughing at them while gnutella runs in the background :)

    - oh yeah, and the pen thing? I've known for along time that pens are very dangerous. They allow people to express ideas, write encrypted messages (you can do simple encryption with pen, paper, and calculator) and even let people draw pornographic pictures (well that's pretty much all I did in art class). Pens and all other writing equipment should be replaced with government approved electronic note-pads that scan the user input for illegal ideas, and banned words and just delete them. :)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delete who the use or the idea?

      AC

  50. Celine Question by Glanz · · Score: 1

    Are Celine D. and her cloned offspring copyright protected too???

    clone n. 1. An exact duplicate: "Our product is a clone of their
    product." Implies a legal reimplementation from documentation or by
    reverse-engineering. Also connotes lower price. 2. A shoddy, spurious
    copy: "Their product is a clone of our product." 3. A blatant ripoff,
    most likely violating copyright, patent, or trade secret protections:
    "Your product is a clone of my product." This use implies legal action
    is pending. 4. [obs] `PC clone:' a PC-BUS/ISA or EISA-compatible
    80x86-based microcomputer (this use is sometimes spelled `klone' or
    `PClone'). These invariably have much more bang for the buck than the
    IBM archetypes they resemble. This term fell out of use in the 1990s;
    the class of machines it describes are now simply `PCs' or `Intel
    machines'. 5. [obs.] In the construction `Unix clone': An OS designed to
    deliver a Unix-lookalike environment without Unix license fees, or with
    additional `mission-critical' features such as support for real-time
    programming. Linux and the free BSDs killed off this product category
    and the term with it. 6. v. To make an exact copy of something. "Let me
    clone that" might mean "I want to borrow that paper so I can make a
    photocopy" or "Let me get a copy of that file before you mung it".

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
    1. Re:Celine Question by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Begun, this clone joke has...

      graspee

  51. Congress acting by briggsb · · Score: 2

    Everyone's favorite Senator has already proposed legislation to stop the menace of the marker.

  52. Felt Tip Marker Companies Get Sued Under DMCA by repoleved · · Score: 2, Funny
    May 22 2002: AP is reporting that several major motion picture industry companies have launched a class-action lawsuit against ...

    1. Garvey Products which sells felt markers that can be used to circumvent a digital rights managed compact disk...
    2. Exotic Birds which has been teaching children the mechanisms by which felt markers leave an indelible mark, which is the key to defeating the copy protection on a number of protected devices.
    3. Instrument Sales which in addition to standard felt markers, sells lumber crayons, which can be used to circumvent even HEAVY DUTY copyright protection!

    In other news, CNN is reporting that a Waste Minimization Assessment for a Manufacturer of Felt Tip Markers has just been published, highlighting the many environmental dangers behind the production of Felt Tip Markers...

    All over the country, newspapers and TV news stations are running stories about inhalant abuse, saying that "Inhalants are the third most abused substances among 12 to 14-year-olds in the United States, coming in right behind alcohol and tobacco." (emphasis in original)

    Shop owners are being interviewed for upcoming movies which depict them as being devastated by marker graffiti on their shop windows...

    And parents are complaining (on national television news, every day) that their kids are coming home covered in marks from classroom marker fights!
    1. Re:Felt Tip Marker Companies Get Sued Under DMCA by cowens · · Score: 1

      In Smyrna, Gorgia children can not buy markers. It is part of an anti-graffiti law that also prevent minors from buying spray paint.

  53. Impossibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is impossible to copy protect digital data.

    I salute the people who developed these bogus copy protection schemes and made their millions. They must have very good salesmen...

    What the RIAA and others need to do, is use the abovementioned super salesmen to tell them how to make money from music in the new milennium, but copy protection isn't going to cut it.

  54. What protection are they looking for ? by Funnyfant · · Score: 1

    As consumers: What is your wishlist for a medium to carry digital data for sale ?

    My wishes:
    - No special hardware required
    - 'backupable'
    - cheap
    - PEN FRIENDLY

    --
    -- You Gotta Do What You Gotta Do
  55. Visual demonstration of the technique... by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Funny

    WARNING: The following image may be illegal under the DMCA. Further, the image depicts the actual commission of a felony offense in the USA. You have been warned.

    Marker Method Illustrated.

  56. Black Market by atomhund · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, time to stock up on felt tip markers.... I'm sure I'll make a pretty penny on these baby's on the black market once they get pulled from the market for violating the DMCA. mua ha.... ha HA!

  57. alternate method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    find a walkman or other player that works with the CPCD. Take the line out or headphone plug and connect it with the "Line In" on your sound card using a male-male cord.

    Use a program like Window's Sound Recorder and record the music to your harddrive as a .wav file (note: wav file will be pretty big). Modify recording for time (ie, strip off dead space before/after song) and volume. Convert wav->mp3 and you're done! Share away!

    also remember to burn the mp3's onto a CD-R as music tracks and then return your CPCD to the store for good measure.

  58. Soon by Glanz · · Score: 1

    Ah yes!!! *sigh* the injustice of it all. Soon we won't be able to call the windows in our homes windows any more because of copyright protection. Pages will have to be ripped out of dictionaries. Webster will be exhumed, and Mom won't be able to write on her conserve jars because markers will be illegal... So I guess I'll just take a break, go back to vinyl 33's and listen to scratchy music while looking out on the graffitiless city through those see-through thingies on my wall.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  59. IT'S A TERROR ATTACK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlaw these terrorist copy circumvention devices immediately!

  60. What about CD markers??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says, right on the label what its for... It was created to mark CD's...

    Dumdumdum...

    1. Re:What about CD markers??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the EFF needs to pursue cases that showcase the absurdity of the DMCA. I want to see Staples get sued over this!

    2. Re:What about CD markers??? by QuackQuack · · Score: 1

      Actually, they should sue the media outlets that reported this story. Nothing would would cause an anti-DMCA backlash faster than if the media realizes that their free-speech rights are being curtailed in absurd ways by this law

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    3. Re:What about CD markers??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Staples. Wal-Mart would be a better target and it would be simple for some geek working their way though school in the electronics department to put a marker display atop the music cd gondola.

  61. Actually, no... by Cognitive+Dissident · · Score: 1

    This is not so much a repeat as a clarification. The title of the story you cite is 'Post-it Notes vs. Copy-inhibited CDs' and though it does mention the marker trick most people will remember the headline rather than a secondary point mentioned in the article. Also, most of the discussion seems to be about the malfunctions caused by the copy-protection and possible legal troubles caused by this. The point about the marker is drowned in the noise. Now that the incredible ease of the marker trick has been emphasized by the mainstream media it's no surprise that you are getting resubmissions.

  62. DMCA: One Foot in the Grave by mchappee · · Score: 1

    Here's what I believe should happen. Redhat, or another DMCA foe, should release a copy-protected audio CD with instructions regarding the use of Linux (for example). Someone should defeat the copy protection with a Sharpie. Redhat then sues Sanford (makers of Sharpie) to have the markers pulled due to DMCA violations (circumvention device). Redhat will, of course, lose horribly. Then we have a precedent. The court will probably rule that the Sharpie has other useful purposes, and will not be taken off of the market, or that the DMCA is too vague. Then CSS and similar tools (that have another purpose) will have a legal ruling to rally behind.

    --
    /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    1. Re:DMCA: One Foot in the Grave by L1nUx+h4x0r · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if they haven't been ruled against a few times already, or if the device was concieved in order to do any type of circumvention.

      --
      The GPL makes software more like your mom. Free and open to all.
  63. Sony got it wrong... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    I use a marker as a copy protection device.

    I just color the whole side.

    Pirates be damned! I'm going to Best Buy tonight to copy protect ALL their CDs for them.

  64. Homework... just how rediculous it can get! by Nemesus · · Score: 1

    Teacher: Ok, Jimmy, where is your homework?

    Jimmy: I don't have it.

    Teacher: Why don't you have it; and don't tell me your dog ate it?!?

    Jimmy: No, nothing like that ma'am. Due to recent litigation the Supreme Court ruled that the manufacture of writing utencils was illegal under the DMCA.
    And I used up my last one on last weeks writing assignment.

  65. The DMCA is no joke. by redelm · · Score: 2
    OK, I'll call you crazy since you requested it. If you think the DMCA is a joke, please talk to Dmitri Skylarov.


    And yes, a paperclip could be considered a circumvention device. It enables you to unlock some CD drive drawers so you can keep trying low level circumvention hacks.

  66. Filter by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    Raise that minimum to browse.

    That rant got you some karma but it wont change \.

    In all likelyhood 75% of those people thought they were the first to post what they said. The other 25% want to get on everyone's nerves and repeat crap endlessly. You just validated their existence.

    Me I just want to hit 200 posts today if I can and I got tired of waiting for good things to say.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Filter by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      "Raise that minimum to browse."

      I keep kicking it up, but there's only so high it'll go...

      "That rant got you some karma but it wont change \."

      Nope, no karma. I'm already capped like quite a few other people.

      "In all likelyhood 75% of those people thought they were the first to post what they said. The other 25% want to get on everyone's nerves and repeat crap endlessly. You just validated their existence."

      I think you're selling people a little short, but there is that. Still, you're leaving out the moderation factor. If my rant causes people to think about just how repetitive the official DMCA joke is getting, maybe they'll be more likely to moderate it as redundant or trolling.

    2. Re:Filter by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      You may not be at the cap any more since this got modded down a bit.

      I'm not selling people short but how many times does something like this come up in the middle of the day and like 200 people silmultaneously post the same joke? That's why I don't like when that kind of thing gets moderated as redundant. You log in you reply and at the very same time a bunch of other people say just the same thing. So why should someone get modded down for that?

      Anyways I'm not trying to argue w/you and your post had some good humor value. And I'm hoping to get modded down some myself as I'm at the cap too and I like to have something to shoot for.

      Plus I'm real close to 200 posts and I'm thinking I can get there today if my boss doesn't bother me w/too much work today. (Yeah I'm a slacker sometimes but I gotta be me)

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  67. Re:Confused editor - No, 3 buttons by CheeseburgerBlue · · Score: 1


    "Power", "Play" and "Pay"

  68. OfficeMAX Commercial? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Life:

    Customer: Hi, where can I find blank CDs?
    Employee: Making Copies. huh? They are on isle five.

    If Life were like OfficeMAX:

    Customer: Hi, where can I find blank CDs?
    Employee: Making Copies. huh? They are on isle five.Right next to the felt tip pens which can be used to circumvent the copy protection of the CDs taht you may be copying. Here I'll print out the instructions for you. And here is my username and password to ftp.phat-warez.com

  69. Slashdot by Sivar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
    News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:Slashdot by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
      News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."

      Did any other BBC Micro-using geeks read this as "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters" in double-height ?

      graspee

  70. Slashback? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I figured I'd post it again since I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions from people who didn't read Slashdot on May 13 ;)

    Isn't this what Slashbacks are for?

  71. Just got back... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    From OfficeDepot, I figure I will get all the felt tip pens i can now - and i will corner the illicit felt tip pen market in no time. Screw coke and pot sales... illegal felt tip pens are gunna bring in a fortune! Its like prohibition all over again. Just call me Al!!

    1. Re:Just got back... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Just call me Al!!

      Can I call you Simon or Garfunkel? :/ It seemed much funnier before I typed it.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Just got back... by InigoMontoya(tm) · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just call me Al!!

      Okay.

      --Betty

      --
      This signature is self-referential.
    3. Re:Just got back... by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      From OfficeDepot, I figure I will get all the
      felt tip pens i can now - and i will corner the
      illicit felt tip pen market in no time. Screw
      coke and pot sales... illegal felt tip pens are
      gunna bring in a fortune! Its like prohibition
      all over again. Just call me Al!!

      Would your nickname be "SharpieFace"?

    4. Re:Just got back... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      someone got it!

  72. Here's an Idea by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's see what you folks make of this.

    The way that democracy and judicial system of yours works at the moment, just about the only thing that will get lawmakers to stick up for Joe and Jane is public outrage/ridicule.

    Basically, I think the EFF should throw the DMCA at the people who make Crayola. Sue the pirating bastards.

    Don't tell me that wouldn't make headlines. And headlines would raise public awareness of the DMCA issue.
    If the DMCA is ridiculed in public over its potential uses, I don't think it'll last long.

    Never mind whether the EFF would win or lose; the whole point is to showcase the idiocy of this law.

    Anyone listening?

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  73. time to start banning felt tip markers by Insane+One · · Score: 1

    It is time to start banning some more things. We can start with banning markers. Once we have no more pens then we will start banning news services for leaking this information to the public. Now that we have no news then we need to shut down the internet. The benefit of that is we stop piracy, online gambling and porn. :)

    --
    "I have gone to look for myself, If I return before I get back keep me here"
  74. Re:DUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A duplicate to be sure, but not a dupe.

    If you aren't sure why, go to dict.org and find out.

    --
    English - The Illegitimate child of Lation and German.
    American - The rebellious teenage child of English.
    American Slang - The mid-twenties junkie friend of American.
    American Haxor - The LSD-induced comatose still-tripping dog of American Slang.

    That's all I have to say about that.

  75. I bet your wrist is hurting again :) by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 1

    "...sick of deleting hundreds of submissions...", I'm surprised that you didn't whine about you wrist again!

    --

    -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

  76. In related news... by DragonPup · · Score: 2

    The president of Sharpie today was dragged from his office by federal agents and is being transported to an undisclosed maximum security federal jail. He stands accused to breaking the security of CD protection and is being treated as a domestic terrorist that endangers our national economy.

    Federal authorities also raided local Taco Bells today in seach for the terrorist known as 'CmdrTaco'. Unable to find the self proclaimed commander of the Tacos, John Ashcroft vowed to keep the search for the Taco Commander until he is found and brought to justice.

    -Henry

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
  77. Felt Tip Pen? by suds · · Score: 1

    Hey d00dz,

    Can't find this program on the web or on Kazaa.. can someone mail a copy to me plz...

    thx

  78. Actually... by wiredog · · Score: 2

    A haiku "about a petrified Natalie Portman slathered in hot grits driving the Slashdot Cruiser over to a Beowulf cluster" would probably get modded up to +5 for the sheer creativity inherent in the thing.

    1. Re:Actually... by goodviking · · Score: 1

      Stone fleshed Nat Portman
      In grit filled Slashdot Cruiser
      Flies to Beowulf

  79. dear slashdot... by fabiolrs · · Score: 1

    ...since youre being so nice to us, users, posting duplicate stories ill help you posting a mirror HERE...

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
  80. How could this be fixed in Linux? by daves · · Score: 1

    So the problem is that computers check the data tracks before playing the audio, and give up when the data track is bad. Is it the CD drive doing this, or could the OS be modified to accept these CDs?

    --
    People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
  81. Base by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

    dude:

    "all your marker are belong to us"

    now those "CD Markers" you can buy which are sold for marking on your CD-Rs etc. are going to face the courts.. oh, no, i live in England so im safe from your pathetic laws

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Base by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 0
      oh, no, i live in England so im safe from your pathetic laws
      We'll be waiting for you at the airport, if you come over. :)

    2. Re:Base by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Thats not funny because its actually true. Plus, i've already been in trouble with slashdot for thretening the president in a post (it was removed):

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/02/17/2082 14 &mode=nested - (remove the space before '&mode' - stupid slashdot, several of the comments say "This comment has been removed" in red, with an explination)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  82. ThinkGeek by tzanger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about the rest of you but I think that ThinkGeek should start selling DMCA Circumvention Devices. e.g. a Sharpie with a custom label with a caution symbol and the text "This object may be used as a device for circumventing copyright protection methods as outlined in the DMCA."

    I think they'd sell. Who wants an entire office toolbox filled with copyright protection circumvention devices? I do, I do!

  83. Slashdot... by Wrexen · · Score: 1

    where repeated stories aren't errors, they're features

  84. Here's the idea by gvonk · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is what it is supposed to look like.

    No idea if it works, however...

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  85. These articles are ILLEGAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the mere act of publishing an algorithm or method for copy-protection circumvention is illegal under the DMCA. Therefore, publishing an article stating that "felt tip marker defeats copy-protected CD's" and then discussing the exact implementation (drawing on the outside of the disk) is illegal under the DMCA. CNN.com may now be sued by Sony for publishing this and slashdot may be sued for further disseminating the information.

  86. BBSpot has coverage of this story too... by seanellis · · Score: 1

    ... and Sony's lawsuit.

  87. Dual use by stain+ain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Marker pens should be included in the list of dual use goods and technologies.

    No more exports to Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Tajikistan, Vietnam, Burma, China, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), Haiti, Liberia, Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan and Zaire.

    1. Re:Dual use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude... there is nothing wrong with the VAST MAJORITY of people in the coutries in your sig... in afghanistan, for example, the problem is the taliban, not the general population.

    2. Re:Dual use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how ever did he get his sig over the 120 char limit?!?!?!?

      And then you realize... It's part of his comment.

    3. Re:Dual use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this should be modded up. funny

    4. Re:Dual use by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Marker pens should be included in the list of dual use goods and technologies.
      No more exports to Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Tajikistan, Vietnam, Burma, China, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), Haiti, Liberia, Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan and Zaire.
      How come Venezuela isn't on the list???
    5. Re:Dual use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know, but I took the list of countries from one site in the US defence department.
      These are the countries for which arms exports are denied, always.

  88. Oh, no!! by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

    They'll arrest me for owning felt tip markers.

  89. Quick, somebody sue Slashdot! by shking · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't someone file an injunction to prevent you from linking to the article? I'm completely serious... just think how the publicity (ie. getting laughed out of court) would help 2600

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  90. It didn't work by no_opinion · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine happened to have some of the UMG and Sony CDs, and he tried to reproduce the results reported in the news. He tried both the marker and the electrical tape techniques, and the only thing he succeeded in doing was making the CDs unreadable in his computer. In one instance the computer would not eject the modified CD and he had to use the paperclip eject trick.

    I would be curious to know if anyone has witnessed success. To me this sounds like the "green marker on the inner ring" rumor that was supposed to make a CD sound better.

  91. Incoming message from Indrid Cold: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WAKE&nbsp UP&nbsp DOWN&nbsp THERE!

  92. I wonder how long... by slakdrgn · · Score: 1
    ...it will be before the news company gets a DMCA C&D letter for posting how to circumvent copy protection on thoes cds..

    slak

  93. Reduce the distance between the data and the audio by count_dooku · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, there might be a way for Sony to revive this copy protection. Couldn't Sony just reduce the the distance between the bogus data track and the audio so that a person with a marker couldn't reliably separate the two?

    --

    --
    For the book says, "We may be through with the past, but the past ain't through with us."
  94. "And we all know what the DMCA says about tools" by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    I don't know, but I'm pretty sure you can find out on the DMCA author page. ;)

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  95. HIFI pen by 1st1 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading an article in some HI-FI magazine some years ago...

    "I you use this [a special very expensive] pen on the edge of the CD it will remove reflections on the CD and it will sound a lot better"

    Now I believe them! It will actually make the CD playable.
    (Well at least if this thing actually works)

    --
    NullPointerException
  96. Re:Confused editor - No, 3 buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, paying's not an option, it's mandatory!

  97. how does this affect CD resale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After you've marked up you CD to get around the copy protection, what are the chances that your favorite used CD store will consider this to be damaged??

    1. Re:how does this affect CD resale? by NickRob · · Score: 1

      You don't have to go to a resale shop. You can return it for full money. Copy protected CDS are returnable. Least, Celine Dion's was.

  98. DMCA violation? by Turner1199 · · Score: 1

    So the news is reporting this? Does this make the media prosecutable under the DMCA? After all, they're explaining how to get around a copy protection.


    Turner

    --
    Windows - Proof that PT Barnum was right!
  99. You mean, you all are actually still buying these? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1
    Uhhh...call me crazy, but don't you think it might be better to show the RIAA and such how you feel by NOT buying these non-CDs rather than buying them (which just gives the industry money anyway), breaking the protection (which is illegal, I guess), and ripping them?

    As was proposed by many people the first time this story was posted, why not boycott these non-CDs? Why not send an email, snail-mail, whatever to the artists whose records are being made this way and tell them what you think? Surely this would be more useful than giving more of your money to the RIAA by buying these things. Plus, that might be mistaken for "supporting the idea of copy-protected (non)CDs...

    Just a suggestion.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  100. Yippie! The paperless office is here! by qwerpoiu · · Score: 1

    Due to the banning of markers, the paperless office is now mandatory under the DMCA!

  101. Linux unaffected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    What a load of crap, the copy protection never affected me as a Linux user anyway. I don't automount my cdroms so my machine never looks for a data track. I had no problems copying the Jimmy Eat World Album which uses this copy protection.

    Also, the article was pants, the bit which really caught my eye was "Because computer hard drives are programmed to read data files first, the computer will continuously try to play the bogus track first." Hmm, hard drives that can read cds, whatever next.... ;)

  102. Facts: DMCA 1201(E) prohibited devices by Anarchofascist · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, the DMCA in section 1201(E) stipulates that the devices are banned if they are (a) designed to circumvent, or (b) have limited commercial purpose other than to circumvent, or (c) are marketed as circumventing a "technological measure that effectively controls access to a work".

    The third part is important and reads "No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title."

    Cut out the guff not related to marker pens, and we get: "No person shall ...provide ... any ... device ... that is marketed by that person ... for use in circumventing [encrypted content access]." So my guess is, can tell you a marker pen can be used to defeat access controls on non-redbook CDs, but then I am not allowed to give you a marker pen.

    In California I can't keep pet snails, molest butterflies or ride a bicycle in a swimming pool either.

    --
    Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    1. Re:Facts: DMCA 1201(E) prohibited devices by NickRob · · Score: 3

      So my guess is,[I] can tell you a marker pen can be used to defeat access controls on non-redbook CDs, but then I am not allowed to give you a marker pen

      Not so, you aren't allowed to tell people how to do it. You could say that somehow the marker can be theoretically used to get around the protection, but you can't demonstrate or tell a person how exactly to circumvent it.

    2. Re:Facts: DMCA 1201(E) prohibited devices by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1
      Read (b) from your posting.

      (b) have limited commercial purpose other than to circumvent

      You can't tell me that marker pens have limited commercial purpose....they are used for millions of different things.
      That part is in there to prevent something that is designed mainly to circumvent copy protection, but also has one real use that they try to camoflauge it under, such as if Dmitry would have made his ebook thing also be able to play audio CDs or something with the code, and claimed the program was legal cause it's purpose was to play CDs

      THis is oversimplified by me, and I couldn't think of a real good analogy, but part (b) in there pretty much prevents anything being done about marker pens.

      Which is good, cause I don't want to pay $20 for my sharpies.
      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
  103. Celine Dion CD made listenable with marker pen by jolshefsky · · Score: 1
    May 22, 2002 Posted: 12:25 PM EDT (1625 GMT)

    ROCHESTER, NY -- Technology buffs have cracked music publishing giant Sony Music's elaborate Celine Dion distribution technology with a decidedly low-tech method: scribbling around the middle of a disk with a felt-tip marker.

    Internet newsgroups have been circulating news of the discovery for the past week, describing the simple method of making the latest Celine Dion release, "A New Day Has Come" actually tolerable to the human ear. The technique involves covering the section of the disc from the center rim to 1cm from the edge of the disc with indellible ink.

    "My children would scream in agony at the sound of the new CD," one post on alt.music.celine-dion said, "but with the modified disc, they even got their homework done while I listened."

    Sony has not commented on the discovery, but experts believe no legal action will be taken since the technique does not defeat Sony's "Key2Audio" copy protection.

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  104. how about... by JonWan · · Score: 1

    Instead of a sharpie, I chuck one of these "CD" like things up in my metal lathe and cut the outside edge off down to the "gap". Now does that make my metal lathe a circumvention device?

  105. A Challenge by hyperizer · · Score: 1

    I figured I'd post it again since I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions...

    What do you say, should we submit this story repeatedly over the next week or two and try for a triplicate post?

  106. StarWars Episode2 Protection ! by tarkin · · Score: 1

    Well , I bought the soundtrack from Episode 2 only to come home and notice the big label "Will not play on PC/MAC". And yes sir, it doesn't play/rip on my x86 or my powerbook g3.

    I looked at this page to get some more information on the felt-pen method, but discoverd my SW cd didn't had the big seperated outside track. So I guessed I'd be searching the Limewire for the mp3 files...

    I gave the disc to my friend who has a Powerbook G4 (the previous model - 2 months old) and the disc played and ripped without a problem, probably because it has a very recent dvd/cdrw combo drive.

    Well, I'm glad I can listen to the soundtrack anywhere I want too, and I hope Sony comes to their senses about these silly schemes.
    If they'd really look at the p2p networks they'd see that their effort to keep the music of those networks is already in vain...

    --
    blaah !
  107. Actually, this is very old news by fuxoft · · Score: 1
    In February, Czech underground group TRI SESTRY ("Three Sisters") has published on its website (http://www.trisestry.cz) detailed instructions on how to bypass this CD protection. Not only the "black marker" method but also several others. This was because Sony used CD protection on Tri Sestry's album even after Tri Sestry specifically demanded that their CD is NOT copy-protected. The CD sleeve actually contains the text: "This CD is copy protected against our wishes. Please visit our website to find out how to bypass this protection."

    I translated the relevant paragraphs from their website and submitted it to Slashdot along with detailed explanation on FEBRUARY, three months ago. Guess what? It was rejected...

    --

    --- Frantisek Fuka (Yes, that's my real name and you have no idea how it's pronounced)

  108. Reminds me of the old days by danger42 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the old days when you could use a pair of scissors or a hole-puncher to make single-sided 5 1/4 inch floppies into double-sided.

    Or put a piece of tape over the hold to make them read-only.

    Sigh.

    --
    -nd
  109. Re:Confused moderator by serutan · · Score: 2


    Insightful??

    I guess there's no "doesn't get the joke" category.

  110. Sony Get Ahead by cadillactux · · Score: 1

    Just released!

    Sony, after the embarasing default of their state-of-the-art copy protection system, have announced a new, more proven, form of theft protection system. According to Sony, a black magic marker will now be run across the bottom of all new CD's in an X fashion. This marking will prevent all CD-Burners to eject the disk in disgust. Macintosh computers have been known to crash when reading these disks, and PC cd-rom drives have exploded due to increased spin rates. There is a warning on the CD which states "Any attempt to play this CD in any device will result in four alien beings sucking your brain out your ears, becasue obviously you don't need it". Music enthusiasts are upset at the fact that these CD's cannot be played in even 100% honast to goodness CD players. Sony refused to comments on this accusation in public, but did tell our reporter that it is a minor side-effect that Sony will look into, Until then, people are encouraged to buy these new CD's and help Sony gain a monopoply, just like Micro$oft.

    --
    Is this thing on?
  111. It was bound to happen... by l1gunman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Funny, huh?! This is major egg-on-the-face for the developers of that so-called protection. In my 'experience', this has always been the case. Even the most sophisticated protections are defeated by the simplest of hacks. You can keep your data encrypted, and protect the decryption routines with anti-debugging methods but, at some point, the data must be rendered. Once it's rendered, it's fair game again and everything you did until that point is moot. Take TotalRecorder, AudioJacker, LoopRecorder, InternetNinja, even the PrintScreen key as examples of that. (Or a scheme of siphoning the audio from a protected DVD by rendering it in a hand-built filter graph with a splitter and dump filter in the audio path.)


    This latest hack is a twist on that theme - the marked lines invalidate the disc track that's supposed to keep make your PC think it has a bad disc. If you kill the bogus track, the PC's CD-ROM drive can simply go on to rendering the next one, the real one.


    No matter what you do in the digital world, there is still the possibility of ripping at the analog level. Standard consumer equipment exists that can make a really good A/D conversion and get a high-quality rendering of the audio content back into the digital realm without any DRM encumbrances. CD players exist that have digital output (S/PDIF) - run that output back into a sound card with matching inputs and you're done. Any of these so-called protected discs can be played, and ripped, in such a set-up. My goofy DVD/CD/MP3 player has such an output (yours too?). Once you have one digital copy, it'll show up on the Internet all over again.


    Only by encrypting the data all the way to a closed rendering subsystem (decrypting speakers or headphones?) could you prevent this - and consumers will never stand still for that. Any solution that prevents consumers from getting their fair use out of purchased content, by that I mean the ability to play it wherever they want (iPod anyone?) is akin to handcuffing everyone in order to prevent crime.


    This is a war that can never truly be won, the only solution is for the content producers to embrace the technology rather than trying to kill it. A new business model that exploits the Internet and its bandwidth and provides a reasonable exchange of fair value for goods received is the only way they can inhibit (not wipe out) piracy. If discs were fairly priced, rather than selling for 30 times their manufacturing cost, there would be little need or impetus for Joe-Sixpack to participate in piracy. If you could buy the songs you wanted, rather than pay full price for an album that has more filler than meat, that would also help.


    I'd really like to see an unbiased, non-knee-jerk-reaction analysis of the so-called harm done to RIAA member studio profits by the file sharing. We've all read analysis that suggests CD sales were actually helped by the emergence of Napster. Recent downturns in the industry are more likely due to general lagging in the economy rather than lost sales due to piracy. Any 'solution' to this problem needs to take a cold, hard look at those facts, first.


    I have a very curious view on this given that my 'job' for the last few years has been on the side of the protectors...

  112. www.slashdotfordumbfucks.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....where we repeat old stories for people who are not intelligent enough to read past the first screenful of posts.

    1. Re:www.slashdotfordumbfucks.org by newHercules · · Score: 1

      How did I miss this the first time? Duh! Perhaps I have a life, and someone TBTG realized that this is important -- as in worth repeating.

      Thanks guys and gals. It's like someone forgot to lock the dorm after curfew. Cool.

      Perhaps /. for df's is the better site, distilling out only what is really necessary to life in the 21st.

      --
      newHercules
  113. Adhesives by AVryhof · · Score: 1

    The original article said the adhesive from post-it notes will work as well...Of course the theft protection devices included on the inside of CD Cases contains a similar adhesive....this should be the preferred method....then when they outlaw them people can just walk off with copies of the CD.

  114. LETS GO AFTER STAPLES! by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    This seems like a perfect opportunity to underline JUST HOW FUCKING REDICULOUS the DMCA is. We push the gov't to back up their rediculous law by going after everyone that's ever sold a felt-tip pen under the DMCA.

    If that doesn't get the DMCA shown up for the vile heap of rat excrement it is, then nothing will.

    --
    Fooz Meister
  115. The Important Thing is that it Works by serutan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok ok ok, we get the jokes (most of us anyway).

    The important thing is not whether felt tip pens will become illegal. It's that somebody figured out a laughably simple way to defeat something Sony must have spent a good chunk of money coming up with. I'm thinking meetings, demos, testing, approval, and at least one large congratulatory catered lunch. And now they look like idiots. Nothing, I mean NOTHING, upsets corporate management more than being made fools.

    Right on.

  116. CD Protection Strategy May Be Violating 1992 Act by ranb · · Score: 5, Informative
    I came across this interesting angle on CD copy protection a while back in Now you can't make a copy:
    "The other difficulty for the recording industry's new CD protection strategy surfaced on 28 December in a letter from the Virginia Congressman Rick Boucher (Democrat) to executives of the recording industry's trade association. The letter reminds them that their fancy new technology may violate a statute for which they themselves lobbied vigorously a decade ago. This is the 1992 Act which gave music listeners the right to make some personal digital copies of their music in return for allowing recording companies to collect royalties on the blank media used for this purpose . Under this, the industry cheerfully collects a few cents for every digital audio tape, blank audio CD or minidisc sold. Boucher has not yet had a reply from the movie and record moguls. But when he does he will discover vicious animals are at their most dangerous when cornered."
  117. Uh-Oh... Non-standard C code? by JCMay · · Score: 1

    You should know that the way you defined your arguments to processSubmission() is not canonical.
    Alternatively, you could have used

    void processSubmission(char *submissionString, char **toExclude, int toExcludeLength)

    1. Re:Uh-Oh... Non-standard C code? by JCMay · · Score: 2
      WTF?!? It previewed fine! Now I have to wait
      for the Lameness filter, too...

      You should know that the way you defined your arguments to processSubmission() is not canonical.

      Here is a discussion:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=32873&thre shold=0&commentsort=0&tid=156&mode=nes ted&cid=3548952
      (Live link doesn't seem to work).

      The perfered form would be
      void processSubmission(char *submissionString, char *toExclude[], int toExcludeLength)
      Alternatively, you could have used
      void processSubmission(char *submissionString, char **toExclude, int toExcludeLength)
      I don't think it matters much; isn't Slash written in Perl? (How does *it* pass the Lameness filter?)
  118. Depends on how you look at it... (Re:Read the DMCA by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 1
    It's the same situation as the fellow who's program unset the true type embedded bits [slashdot.org] and a generic hex editor. The first tool has one purpose, to twiddle embedding bits. The second tool has lots of commercially significant purposes many unrelated to any kind of circumvention.

    Depends on how you look at it. You could also say that the pen has one purpose: to mark things with ink. The question in the former case is, what are the various uses of twiddling those embedded bits?

    --
    All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
  119. This has got to really, really piss of Sony by jswitte · · Score: 1

    This has got to really, really piss of Sony (or whomever they bought/licensed the "copy protection" (sic) technology from). Just imagine, now the probably several tens of millions of dollars (at least) invested in creating this piece of crap are mostly wasted..

  120. Rimming? by purrpurrpussy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You want me to rim my CDs???? How gay do you have to be artist these days? Isn't this discrimination?????

    ;->

    --
    "None of this shit works" -W.Shatner
  121. An illegal link by bdoliver · · Score: 1

    So then this would be bad: Buy Sharpie's Now

  122. Re: I tried the Post-It Method.... by tigris · · Score: 1

    ...and with a bit of adjusting of the post-it, it worked fine on my copy-protected CD-Single of Vanessa Carlton's "Thousand Miles". I would have preferred the marker method, but I didn't have a water-soluble felttip available and I want to return this crippled disk tomorrow. I wouldn't have bought it if I had known that Universal/A&M was copy-protecting all its new releases. And there was absolutely NO indication on the packaging or on the CD itself that it was copy-protected. Interestingly enough, the CD Logo was missing from the surface of the CD where it usually resides. But its absence wouldn't have helped me since I couldn't open the CD case to have an actual look at the CD before I purchased it.

    It's unfortunate that Universal is treating me like a potential criminal when all I want to do is listen to these tracks which I've payed for on my mp3 player and my computer. I like Vanessa Carlton and I want to support her releases but I'll be deleting these two tracks from my hard drive and telling my friends to avoid purchasing her CDs when I return this single tomorrow. I'd write Universal a letter, but obviously the only thing that matters to them is money. So I'll let my return do the talking.

    Bakas.

    Tig

  123. Hoist by your own petard, eh? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • We posted this story over a week ago [...] I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions

    Given that Slashdot gets all of its stories from other sources, and that it (demonstrably) only runs stories after many submissions (so the "last" submitter gets his name on it rather than the first), and that the "editors" (I use the term loosely) very demonstrably don't even read their own stories, then this is just business as usual.

    How about you change the site policy and actually go out and find stories yourself or even (gasp!) do some actual investigative journalism?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Hoist by your own petard, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We posted this story over a week ago [...] I'm really sick of deleting hundreds of submissions

      I just want to confess that I was one of those hundreds, but I did do a search first but only on the word "pen" which doesn't appear in the previous story's write-up and thus my search indicated that it would probably was a new story.

      So while I apologize for taking some of your time I ask what else am I supposed to do, and why is it that Slashdot can post two stories within 9 hours of each other on Mercury meteorites if they are being as diligent as I had been as a voluntary contributor?

  124. Horse's Mouth [Re: Confused editor] by alacqua · · Score: 2
    Well, here's the quote. I got it from this page at the eff.

    `(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that--
    `(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
    `(B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
    `(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

    --

    Move on. There's nothing to see here.
  125. Off-topic: I prefer commentary in the discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd prefer to read people's opinions in the comments section and not in the by-line for stories. This especially includes bitching about people submitting good news, even if they're redundant submissions. I'd think that if you don't like deleting duplicate news emails, this isn't the hobby/line of work for you. Granted, I have read Slashdot's numerous request for folks who submit news to make sure similar stories haven't already been posted, but how often do people find an interesting article and then immediately go search the SD archives before submitting? Isn't it the job of "reporters", and I use that term as lightly as it seems to be taken around here, to shift threw the news and post what's interesting to the community, preferable without the commentary in the news post?

    In all fairness, I realize that Slashdot is foremost a discussion board, and then it is a news site. However, I for one, and I doubt that I'm alone in this, would like to read straight-and-to-the-point news headlines and leave the commentary for the comments section.

    -I'd like to see a user-mod feature (for other users comments) in every discussion board.-

  126. Attention entrepreneurs! by Chief+Typist · · Score: 1

    How long do you think it will take before someone comes out with a kit that makes it easy to draw the black circle around the outside rim of the CD?

    Something like those "easy CD labeling" thingys.

    -ch

  127. Re:Be careful... Its looks like they weren't !! by geekster_2000 · · Score: 1

    Its unfortunate that their technology for copy protection doesnt work, but I understand from
    reading about Volume Holographic Optical Storage
    the technology is supposed to be unbreakable
    because the copy protection is in the molecular or atomic data pattern. If you interested the web

    www.colossalstorage.net

    they do an extentive evaluation of all data storage type on their colossal5.net webpage.

  128. tommorows headline: by fatgraham · · Score: 2, Funny

    "public school is front for mass CD copy circumvention"

  129. Late breaking story by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    This just in: It seems top executives of Sanford, makers of the widely-used Sharpie felt-tip pens, and Avery Dennison, makers of the ever popular Marksalot markers, are dumping their stocks. This follows the recent findings that the two products just mentioned, when properly used in conjunction with human hands, can be used to circumvent the copy-protection of several CDs that have recently been released. The heads of both companies have supposedly been aware of the potential for legal action to be taken against the prodcuts since the discovery of the copy-protection workaround, yet both continue to pump out millions of pens. Former Sanford employee Emily Frankins has come forward claiming to have been fired after threatening to alert officials to the shredding of memos containing valuable information regarding the pens. The shredding of memos to higherups in the company concerning the obvious lack of respect for the law has supposedly been going on for the past week.

    In a related story, God continues to argue with authorities in the ongoing investigation of human hands. God claims that the human body is modular only to some extent and that it would not be feasible for Him to remove hands from all people. Government officials are currently seeking the help of anyone that no longer has either of their hands as a result of an 'Act of God' in order to prove that the removal of hands can in fact be accomplished. Officials are also investigating the possibility of using other body parts to write onto copyprotected CDs and the possibility of having God remove those parts as well. This includes using feet, arm, legs, mouth, and other orifices that could hold a pen while marking on a CD.

  130. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That *cocksucker* was Mr. Bad at Pigdog who put it together to confuse the RIAA attack dogs who were trying to eradicate deCSS from the internet.

    Here.

  131. Imminent death of the CD predicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DiVX ;-)s at 11.

  132. Felt Tip Markers are the Devil! by quarkjoe · · Score: 1

    BAN ALL FELT TIP MARKERS!
    They are evil DMCA breakers!

    --
    cat /bin/laden >> /dev/null
  133. Memo to Sharpie... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    It has come to our attention that you are distributing a tool (aka the "Sharpie Fine Point Permanent Marker") used to circumvent current copy-protection mechanisms on audio disks. This violates the DMCA. Please stop immediately or we will send the flying monkeys after you.

  134. Will MTV show musicians with green sharpies? by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    The latest ghetto wear is the warez-friendly green sharpie hanging from a gold necklace.

    It says "I'm bad, I like free music, and the cops can stuff it!"

    Soon we'll see runway models with green sharpies on necklaces.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  135. Dmitry and Disney by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Tell that to Dmitry.

    You know, I'm not kidding when I say that I accidentally read that line:

    "Tell that to Disney."

    It's really sad when when people have started to subconsciously associate wholesale abuse of the law and the public with the company which brought us Mickey Mouse and DisneyWorld. Wow. I guess the real question becomes--what have they done for us lately, versus what have they taken from us lately?

    Draconian copyright laws designed solely to keep Mickey from becoming public property like he would have years ago, and to keep their artificial-scarcity DVD racket going. The shredding of tons of documentation to prevent the family of Pooh's copyright licensor from proving that they weren't given their contractual percentage of the incredible sales. Some "family" company it's become, eh Walt?

    --

    Chasing Amy
    (We all chase Amy...)
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
  136. am I illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I've circumvented a few copy protection schemes in my time, and people often call me a "tool" ... does that make me illegal?

  137. Alternative to felt markers by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

    If the purpose here is to prevent the outer track from being read, the solution is simple. Take any somewhat sharp object (knife, pen, pencil) and scratch at the top side of the CD where you would have marked on the bottom. A foil-like layer will come off, and you're done.

  138. New project! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone buy one of these CD's and "fix" it.
    Make sure when you open the case that you do not break the seal (just lift the opposite corner of the case)

    Then put it back in and return it. I've returned CD's before this way and as long as you didn't break the seal they'll take it back. Just tell them you don't want it because it won't play in your computer.

  139. Let the swapping resume! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Fuck the greedy bastards.

    Information wants to be free!

    Go www.goldcrack.org for your free information (cracks, warez, mp3s).

  140. iv allready herd by rageteen · · Score: 1

    a felt tip marker aroung the outer edge of a copy protected cd will disable copy protection but u run the risk of loseing the last track on the cd

  141. Re: I tried the Post-It Method.... by alouts · · Score: 1
    If you really do care, you should return the disc (like you're planning on doing), and write to Universal AND the artist.

    Universal will probably shit-can it, but unless Vanessa Carlton is selling millions of copies (never heard of her, but I may just be out of touch), every fan/sale will make a difference to her. Make sure you explain the economics of the situation to her. If you can't play the disc, and none of your friends can, that's X people who would have contributed to her pocketbook. Multiply some percentage out by her fanbase and she will start to see what kind of money she's losing by allowing the record company to do this.

    If artists start hearing from former fans en masse that they are losing sales due to their record companies' practices, and that they are pissing off these fans without any doing of their own, maybe Universal will start getting heat from their breadwinners. If their assets start complaining and maybe even walking out, there's a chance that this copy protection bullshit won't have to go to courts. Maybe good old economics will move it the way of DIVX.

  142. the marker analog is incorrect by stratocaster · · Score: 1

    While it's rather funny that a marker could be considered a circumvention device under the DMCA, I believe the logic is completely flawed. The pen is just a *tool* to create a particular *type* of circumvention device (in
    this case a mark on the CD). For example, with DeCSS, your text editor (where you edit the C code)
    or compiler are not circumvention devices, they are tools which allow you to create the device (
    source code or executable code -- these both seem to be considered circumvention devices.)

    An illustration: one could imagine a product which consisted of a mostly clear, CD-sized sleeve with a small
    sliver of black on it which would do the same thing as this mark on the pen. It would be this sleeve -- which
    one inserts the CD in -- that would be illegal, and not the materials that it was made out of. To conclude,
    the resultant ink mark is the actual circumvention device, not the marker.

  143. Bwahahaha!!!!! by darkonc · · Score: 1, Redundant
    All we need now is for some geek band to put out a copy-protected CD, and then sue Pilot and Bic for making felt pens!

    Let the Copyright games begin!

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  144. what does one say to this when asked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    when asked by those who assume I am in the know, what is the way to tell these CD's apart (once outside the wrapper)? I can't answer that and I can't answer the question of 'why would anyone knowingly release this?' People are finicky and there will be a definite point of no return (notoriety wise) about this issue at which time it will be a household phrase. So, then what will these finicky people do? They will stop buying the CD's that they 1) can't trust and 2) cannot use on their computer at work to listen to.

    Forget arguments about rights and priveledges, we are talking about basic consumer perception. Why buy something that you cannot use with as many 'things' as you do with other products of the same category? Would many people knowingly buy a car that only works on a portion of the roads their standard car works on? (and more importantly that they currently use out of need/want)

    There is a time to fight... then there is a time to just sit back and watch your enemy stab himself repeatedly. (and this will be funny)

    However, the legal side needs addressing. If I mistakenly pop in the wrong CD and it fubars my system then in most cases the CD manufacturer should be held accountable. One very weak and temporary solution to this is to simply publicize this issue MUCH better than has been done to date. Now admitingly I have only bought about 5 CD's in the past 2 years... so the loss from someone like me is insignificant for the most part.

  145. No, read it all... by Tom7 · · Score: 2
    They define "effectively controls access" in the DMCA. It is not a judgment call based on the english word "effective". The definition is:

    (B) a technological measure ''effectively controls access to a work'' if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.

    I'd agree that the CD copy protection doesn't fit this definition either (in what sense does it require application of information/process/treatment?), but it has nothing to do with "how effective" the protection is.

    Sorry, just sick of hearing this particular argument (I had it suggested to me many times in my own DMCA battle ... I think that having the good guys understand the law is an important step.

    1. Re:No, read it all... by dcgaber · · Score: 2

      This is correct, that in general the english definition of effective is not necc the same as the DMCA def of effective. No argument from me there. But, even looking beyond the plain meaning to the definition that you provide, my first paragraph is still acurate. It is not an effective control in terms of requiting the application of information...blah blah blah if it just requires a cheap pen to swipe a strip away. Anyways, thanks for bringing up the distinction, b/c it is important to bear in mind. It leads to sloppy argumentation not to make that distinction clear, and I appreciate you keeping me honest, though I did mean it would not be a violation of DMCA under any definition of effective control.

      Nice to read your response though. I have been following this whole saga you are having with AFGA on Declan's list. Of course, I am sure your program has been dl in great numbers in the last week or two, and now I would guess that the amount of people that knew about the program prior to AFGA's stunts and post-publication is a factor of 100-1000 times. I would also guess that many people did not know this was possible to do with fonts until AFGA made an issue about it. Anyways, good luck with your fight.

      For some humor on this subject, the DMCA/Sharpie one that is, look here.

  146. Re:Depends on how you look at it... (Re:Read the D by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    Yes indeed. In fact, the "twiddling" that my program does isn't even always "circumvention", since circumvention only occurs when it is done without the authority of the copyright holder. I guess Royster should read the whole DMCA!

  147. This could get good... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    For sale - Music CD circumvention devices.

    Comes in scented and unscented.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  148. Why are we even buying these CD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using this circumvention only provides the record companies more money because it show that these CD's are being purchased. What needs to be happening is that we either (1) not purchase these "CD's" anymore, or (2) purchase, then return with the statement that they didn't work in any of our CD players and that it's a piece of crap.

    These discs aren't just Celine Dion discs anymore, they are from people like J. Lo, too. Find out, and boycott!!!

  149. Re: I tried the Post-It Method.... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    >It's unfortunate that Universal is treating me like a potential criminal when all I want to do is listen to these tracks which I've payed for on my mp3 player and my computer

    You know, the idiot guy on CNN, Jack Cafferty made a comment that pissed me off.

    They were talking about how to do this, and he jumped in and said something inane like

    "Gee, next why don't we tell them how to crack into safes or something?"

    So the implication is that you must be out to steal if you want to be able to play this in your PC. They only said these were 'copy protected', not PC player disabled. The assumption being, that unless you are putting this into a stand-alone player, you must be out to illegally copy the CD.

    bleah

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  150. Of course no one can prove it! by emkman · · Score: 1

    That would require buying a Celine Dion CD, and god knows when that will happen.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  151. DMCA safe markers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you drain the ink out, does the marker become DMCA compliant?

  152. Pirates hurt business *fnord* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice this quote about Sony Music Europe:

    "Sony Music Europe has taken the most aggressive anti-piracy stance in the business. Since last fall, the label has shipped more than 11 million copy-protected discs in Europe, with the largest proportion going to Germany, a market label executives claim is rife with illegal CD-burning."

    They've sold 11 MILLION CDs! And that's just one type of CD for one company in an area "rife with illegal CD-burning."

  153. News flash: Run on office-supply stores... by inimicus · · Score: 1

    (OK, so I missed this the first time it was posted... still...)

    I can see the stories now... "Riots at OfficeMax as thousands buy out markers..."

    Glad I bought that box of Sharpies last week...

    --
    Internet Explorer was unable to link to the Web page you requested. The page might use standard HTML or CSS.
  154. 20% More Stuff by Number_5 · · Score: 1

    I remember when Music CD's first came out and you could get .. well.. "CD Quality" sound for a fraction of the cost of a serious turntable etc. The audiophiles claimed you would get better bass response if you marked the edge with a green felt tip or something. Some PC magazine ran a story that said "yea and the Encarta CD will give you 20% more entries if you use the marker on it."

  155. What about this scenario by AaronPSU79 · · Score: 1

    Sony may or may not have been aware their copy-protection could be broken this way. However I'm sure they knew that eventually it WOULD be cracked somehow, there's no disputing that. My question is will they use this as evidence to support DRM claims. I can just see it now: "But we tried to protect our cd's judge, it just won't work!! the only solution is hardware level copy protection in everything with a cd-rom drive in it...."

  156. You can do this to ALL of your CDs! by gosand · · Score: 2
    This is truly amazing!!!! It really works!!!!

    Seriously, get a black Sharpie marker. The permanent kind. Take every one of your CDs, audio, data, etc., and black out the outside 1/2" of the whole CD on the shiny side. This will not only make sure that none of them are copy protected, it will allow you to write to them over and over. Even AUDIO CDs you buy in the store. It is like cutting out the notch on the old 5.25" floppy diskettes to make them double sided - ONLY BETTER! Free CDRWs! The DMCA doesn't want you to know about this, so pass it on.

    Holy crap, I hope nobody really tries that...

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  157. Outter track? Explain please... by Tokerat · · Score: 2
    I do not understand this scheme, but then again I'm not expert on Redbook CD formats or the way they are modified to create this protection scheme.

    • The inner track is audio.
    • The outter track is data with bad sectors etc.


    Doesnt' a CD begin from the inner tracks and progress outwards (opposite of a vinyl record)? Wouldn't this allow the drive to see the audio tracks first? Or would a computer CD drive go for the data which is mapped in the TOC to the outter track first as opposed to a regular CD player which says "skip the data BS and move to audio track 1"?

    If anyone can explain how this works, I'm pretty sure you're not violating the DMCA...
    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  158. Re:CD Protection Strategy May Be Violating 1992 Ac by elwormogrande · · Score: 1
    this is how it works in Canada - however, the phrase "right" from
    the right to make some personal digital copies of their music in return for allowing recording companies to collect royalties on the blank media used
    wouldn't be precisely accurate in how it works up here - it's actually called "fair dealing," and it's only acceptable as a defence in court against charges of copyright infringement, like an insanity plea against murder.

    of course, the fact that this levy / tax hasn't been yet extended to hard drives means that any Canadian who has MP3s of commercially released music is breaking the law, regardless of whether they purchased it before in another medium.

  159. ATTENTION MODERATORS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this post up!

  160. Why not just expose what people are submitting? by Dot+Com+Drew · · Score: 1

    Then in case like this you can point all those submissions to the article you already covered. Maybe it will shut people up.

    "How come Taco wont post my story on the new matrix movie?" ...looks at submissions bin with tons of the same article. Sees link to existing article for that topic. "Well hell. I guess I will have to find something else from a few days ago on theregister to report on."

    just a thought. probably not the best one I have had.

    --
    This .sig is .false
  161. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  162. Down with the DMCA and the MPAA by rawg · · Score: 1

    I buy a CD, then I rip the CD to MP3, then I return or sell back the CD.

    Lets give them something real to worry about.

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
  163. BBSpot have a good take on this by gagravarr · · Score: 2

    bbspot have a very good take on this whole thing - http://www.bbspot.com/News/2002/05/markers.html

    --
    This post will enter the public domain 70 years after my death, unless Disney buys another extension.
    1. Re:BBSpot have a good take on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My favorite line.

      "Some citizens may have to switch to pencils or ball point pens," Hollings continued, "but that's a small price to pay for the security of our great nation."
  164. nitpick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OfficeDepot are the ones with the "helpful tip" ads

  165. Whoa... by VistaBoy · · Score: 1

    Oh, those hippie programmers couldn't possibly figure out our scheme for making copy-protected CDs. *whisperwhisper* What!? OH CRAP!

  166. Re:Hoist by your own petard, eh? [offtopic] by bartyboy · · Score: 2

    While not really cutting-edge news, interactive interviews, Ask Slashdot and book/movie reviews do fall into the investigative journalism category.

    (The reviews may be more opinion than news, but it's still original /. material.)

    However, I agree that the story selection process has many faults.

  167. Other Schemes? by bnjf · · Score: 1

    I've got two CDs with SACEM, SDRM, SACD, SGDL written on it. They will not sync up in my newish ATA CD-ROM (takes about a minute, then the red light just flashes). However, they will get recognised in my 2x SCSI CD-ROM -- go Apple.

    There is what looks like an extra track, but it's right next to the audio. I've tried the felt-tip marked technique, but the CD still fails to read.

    Oh well.

  168. ROTFL by msouth · · Score: 1

    there should be a special list of posts called "+6 funny", that are just severely funnier than even the average +5. And this post should be their KING :).

    well, anyway, at least a well respected citizen.

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  169. Celine Dion CD on the edges? DO THE WHOLE DISC! by jamesjw · · Score: 1

    I used my felt tip marker to color the entire CD surface in, the world is one CD safer!

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
  170. This is *really* old news by fadden · · Score: 1
    The first occurrence of the article that I'm aware of is http://cdprot.cjb.net/, and was posted in August of 2001.

    [Note: the page either pops up an ad or tries to inflict some sort of download from Gator on you if you're running MSIE.]

  171. Re:CD Protection Strategy May Be Violating 1992 Ac by IHateUniqueNicks · · Score: 1

    RRRR. Wrong. (Or at least, likely soon to be) The proposed increase in this levy left the public discussion phase on the 8th of this month (I beleive), and will be decided on soon (yes, I'm too lazy to go find out exactly when). I would be surprized to see this increase shot down after the original levy was approved.

    The new levy stipulates a $21/Gb levy on blank hard drives included in devices primarily used for music storage and use.

    This amounts to $210 of tax on (often $200) 10Gb MP3 players. At least until they start including intro chimes on them from the factory.

    The nice thing about this levy is that it gives us as citizens the right to copy any music for personal use without reimbursing the recording companies (or the artists, but they don't get much anyway). Just be careful that YOU make the copies you want to listen to (no, the owner of the original does not matter, and no, who's equipment you do the copy on does not matter) because if you're friend makes the copy, only HE is legally allowed to use it.

    This actually (in my mind, but IANAL) confuses the MP3 issue a bit, because when I go online, and I request a download of the MP3, and the copy is made on my request, aren't I doing the copying, and as such don't I now have a right to use that copy?

    I guess it comes down to "who" is doing the copying. I would agree the original copy is done using someone else's machine, but that isn't against the law.

    Does anyone know what the actuall legal standpoint on this is?

    Not having read the levy in it's entirety, I can not say whether or not the mediums we are permitted to copy onto are specified as only those with the levy or not, but I don't see it being too far from now that MP3 devices will connect to the 'net themselves. Until then, just use your 'net enabled PocketPC to write directly to a flash card (which will be covered under the new levy).

  172. Re:Reduce the distance between the data and the au by byran+lei · · Score: 0

    >Unfortunately, there might be a way for Sony to revive this copy
    >protection. Couldn't Sony just reduce the the distance between the
    >bogus data track and the audio so that a person with a marker couldn't
    >reliably separate the two?
    >
    >
    Not really,because this trick depend on hardware features of cdrom drives. The data track has to be created in such a way so the drive can recogize it, otherwise it would be like it wasn't there or run the risk of creating a corrupt disk that *nothing* can read.

  173. I can see it now by gi-tux · · Score: 1

    A one-time loser walks into a bank carrying a sawed-off shotgun. He shoots the guard at the bank, robs the bank, and starts his get-away. During the police chase in his get-away, 10 people a hurt and numerous cars are wrecked including several police cars.

    time passes to trial

    He comes before the judge and jury. He is given 90 days suspended sentence for the robbery because he came from a home where his mother didn't love him. He is given 5 years suspended sentence on the murder of the guard because his father abused him. He is given a $200.00 fine for wreckless driving which caused all the destruction of property (he had no insurance so all of the other folks are on thier own for the cost of repairs, etc). However, upon arresting him it was discovered that he had a felt-tipped marker in his pocket and a copy-protected CD in the CD-player in his car. He is given life in prison for DMCA violation.

    Now isn't that justice for you!

    --
    I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
  174. First against the wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt the RIAA and their Corrupt Henchmen in Congress are now drafting law to ban feltip markers. Government for the rich by the rich of the rich.