Slashdot Mirror


Egyptian Pyramid Rover Finds... Another Door

JoeRobe writes "In what appears to be more evidence that ancient Egyptian architects had a sense of humor, MSNBC is reporting that the pyramid rover has determined what was behind the door at the end of a mysterious shaft alluded to earlier - another door."

561 comments

  1. Are they sure they can get it out again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who fears that the door, currently very hard to get to because it is at the end of a long narrow passage, might soon be the door, extremely hard to get to because it is at the end of a long narrow passage with a broken robot jammed in it.

  2. Short-term memory gone? by sohp · · Score: 5, Informative

    How is this different from a story posted two days ago?

  3. Wait a second... live? by matth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can it be live when the webpage says:

    The National Geographic Channel special Pyramids Live: Secret Chambers Revealed airs in the United States on Fox Television on Monday, September 16, at 8 p.m. ET/PT.

    The only way I know to air a show at 8pm Eastern and Pacific is to have it recorded! So now, is it live? Or is it recorded?

  4. this was tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was tried several years ago. The robot they used did not have a fiber optic camera, and was unable to see past the door, however, it did have a laser on it, and they shined the laser through the cracks in the sides of the door and were unable to see the dot, so there is some evidence that there is a large room behind the door.

    The new robot has a fiber optic camera, and some kind of device which will allow it to see through up to 3 feet of rock.

    One thing that kind of pisses me off about the whole egyptology thing, is that the egyptian government is pretty strict on who they let come and do work like this over there. If they don't agree with some of your views on the history of the pyramids, good luck getting a permit to do anything there. The history of the pyramids is very sketchy, and how the traditional egyptologists think their theories are 100% correct is very arrogant.

    1. Re:this was tried by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The history of the pyramids is not very skechy, there is an entire library of literature about them going into great detail and there is much documentation that has been translated from ancient records as well; visit your local university library and try reading for a change instead of getting all of your data from TV aliens-are-everywhere specials.

      The reason the Egyptian government is wary about letting any old Tom or Dick go digging about is because of the very long history of looting by nearly everyone who's come into contact with ancient treasures over the centuries -- the west being especially guilty of such things. There's also the worry that with today's travel/tourist mania, X-files pilgrims and crowds of pseudo-scientists, the ancient treasures could easily be ground into dust by foot traffic, or worse.

      People with academic credentials and valid (i.e. not having to do with aliens, sorry) research interests can still get access when necessary.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    2. Re:this was tried by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Insightful
      One thing that kind of pisses me off about the whole egyptology thing, is that the egyptian government is pretty strict on who they let come and do work like this over there. If they don't agree with some of your views on the history of the pyramids, good luck getting a permit to do anything there.

      Take a look at the British Museum or Louvre sometime and you will see the reason why. Graverobbers took much of the best stuff in the 19th century and hauled it back home with them under the guise of 'archeology'.

      If you go and tour the sites you will find walls covered with hieroglyphics with great big chunks missing where an 'archeologist' stole some particularly good looking piece.

      The last thing anyone needs is a bunch of crystal waving new age hippies moving in to gather evidence to support their theory that the pyramids were marketing props for aliens selling a new type of chocky mint.

      There are legit revisionist archeologists such as Romer who are challenging the chronology which everyone agrees is out of sync with the Greek and with the old testament.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  5. Very tastefull by t_allardyce · · Score: 5, Funny

    You gotta love America, "Tonight we break in to ancient burial sites LIVE!" Will it have musical performances? What about cheesy hosts who do mummy jokes every 5 mins.?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  6. Beware the Curse! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pretty crafty letting a robot take the blame. I can hear the stories years from now...

    "And the next morning, the robot failed to come out of its tent. When they went in to check, they found the robot frozen in horror, its monitor displaying The Blue Screen of Death!"

  7. If someone's planning on making a DivX... by wirefarm · · Score: 5, Flamebait

    If someone's planning on making a DivX of this, I'd really love to see it.
    (I'm in Japan and don't these channels.)
    I feel a bit guilty for asking, so feel free to leave in the commercials - I'll watch them as my penance.

    Cheers,
    Jim

    (jim at mmdc dot net)

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  8. Shaft exploring by _ganja_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    I watch Shaft exploring programs almost every night, just need to get the right cable channels.

    --

    A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

  9. Best site for info on this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The BEST place to get info about the shafts and the history is:

    http://www.cheops.org/

    It is a site constructed by Rudolph Gattenbrink and contains all of his findings in a very public way... AutoCAD drawings of how each block was cut to form the shaft, etc...

    Zahi Hawass (The director of the Giza site) loves to take credit for anything and everything.. I true ego-maniac... I would love to see Rudolph Gattenbrink get the credit he deserves...

    There is a petition located at:

    http://www.dailygrail.com/petition/

  10. Re:If someone's planning on making a DivX... OT by morgajel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    yes this is off topic, and yes I will get modded down as such.
    man, if I had cable, I'd LOVE to give you a divx of it. hell, I'd even mail you a copy of the cd. Why?
    Because it's frickin fair use!
    If you can't watch a show, it is within your FAIR USE to have someone to record it at a later time.
    My parents would always do that for me when I'd miss saturday moring cartoons to go to my sanchin ryu classes. that was fair use... that's the DEFINITION of fair use.
    So why is this different? because it's Divx? because he asked on an open forum? if that's the case, would it be illegal to ask your bowling buddies if they could tape a show for you?

    he said he'd be willing to watch the commercials, which he probably wouldn't anyways if he was watching it live(channel surf, bathroom, etc).

    This is the kinda shit that makes me sick. that someone automatically thought it was in bad taste because he was excersizing his fair use rights.

    To the parent poster, as I said, I don't have cable either. If someone does score you a divx of it, let me know.I doubt they'll ever release this bad boy to dvd.
    as for the moderators who are gonna mod me as flamebait or a troll, blow me. I have promise you I have more karma than you have mod points(unless it's an ed.).

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  11. Not surprising by Clock+Nova · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's hope they don't find an empty Coke bottle, too.

    --
    There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope they don't find an empty Coke bottle, too.

      With their luck, it will be a "New Coke" bottle.... why am I reminded of Geraldo Rivera by this entire mess....

    2. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous+Canard · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm figuring it's an easter egg. The hacker who designed the pyramid put in a little extra room for his pet mouse that didn't show up on any of the approved plans. Behind the next wall there will be a tiny mouse sarcophagus replete with all of the things that a mouse would need in order to prosper in the afterlife.

      --

      --
      BitTorrent in C -- LibBT
      http://www.sf.net/projects/libbt
    3. Re:Not surprising by netglen · · Score: 1

      == Begin Ancient Graffiti ==

      EAT AT JOES

      == End Ancient Graffiti ==

    4. Re:Not surprising by u8nogard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Userfriendly.org comic explains it all. Check it out.

    5. Re:Not surprising by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      A pet mouse? Are you sure it isn't a gerbil???

    6. Re:Not surprising by packeteer · · Score: 1

      ok way to whore your way to some karma... you simply found a highly modded post from the last article and called it your own... here instead of copy/pasting all the previous wisdom im just going to link to it all in one nice page

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  12. behind magic door number 2..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Al Capone's vault!

    1. Re:behind magic door number 2..... by Mupp252 · · Score: 1

      [UHF]

      Aaaaa Haaaah!!!!!! Road Maps!!!!!!!!!!

      [/UHF]

    2. Re:behind magic door number 2..... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      How about Jimmy Hoffa? Of course everyone really knows that he was taken up by the aliens that deposited him on Earth in the first place.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  13. A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rudolph Gantenbrink and his team discovered the door some years ago. Zahi responded by rushing them out of the country and making sure that they wouldn't be able to come back.

    For years Zahi Hawass has claimed that there is "nothing" to see up the shafts, that there is no "door". Now, he's gone 180 degrees and claims there IS a door. The whole thing is a circus, and Zahi Hawass wants to be ringmaster. He also wants to lay claim to whatever is behind that door--they've completely locked Gantenbrink out of this whole procedure, hijacking what is rightfully his "claim".

    1. Re:A bit of history here by VirtualDestructor · · Score: 0

      It seemed to me that he was just on a mission to prove that Egyptians really built the pyramids, and he was going to draw that conclusion no matter what they found. "Don't look at the skeleton. Look at the lid. Those are FINGERPRINTS! Gasp!" Is there really that big of a following for the "aliens built the pryamids" theory?

      Also, couldn't they have had several researchers there so he didn't have to run back and forth between the two sites? Or is his ego just to big to allow that?

    2. Re:A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

      Correct. It's also noteworthy that the CNN article about this completely fails to acknowledge Gantenbrink's achievements and incorrectly states that the door was discovered in 1872. A summary of Gantenbrink's work can be found at http://www.cheops.org -I.

    3. Re:A bit of history here by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

      Gantenbrink was doing a serious work. But, sadly, his name was used in all the pseudo-science/alien-conspiracy books that appeared since then.

      That's the main reason Hawass kicked him forever from the pyramids.

    4. Re:A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also liked his conclusion that since there were women and children in the work camps, they couldn't be slaves. And they were fed, so they couldn't be slaves. Sure, there bones showed signs of being worked like slaves, but they sure weren't slaves, there were women there! And they wre fed!

    5. Re:A bit of history here by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Well he also showed that they performed surgery on them which is not typical of slaves. Historically a lame slave is treated like a lame horse. It is much more likely that it was religous fervor that drove these people to build the pyramids. I would think that anybody who watches the news would understand what religous fervor can make some people do.

    6. Re:A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "surgery" was a hand that was cut off. Maybe the guy was caught stealing, and they cut his hand off.

      Perhaps they weren't slaves, but using the presence of women as proof was pretty lame.

    7. Re: A bit of history here by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > For years Zahi Hawass has claimed that there is "nothing" to see up the shafts, that there is no "door". Now, he's gone 180 degrees and claims there IS a door.

      Personally I think the whole thing is a hoax - but I won't say that, 'cause I'm afraid some archaeologist will <buzz>punch my lights out</buzz>.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:A bit of history here by uncoveror · · Score: 1, Troll

      Aliens did build the pyramids and the Sphinx. They built the pyramids and face on Mars as well. We have known this since the Viking probe in the '70s. Read all about it. Martians destroy Mars Climate Orbiter. Martians destroy Mars Polar Lander. Martians have base on dark side of moon. There it is in black and white. We couldn't print it if it weren't true!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    9. Re:A bit of history here by DaytonCIM · · Score: 3

      It may be Gantenbrink's "claim," but it is Zahi Hawass' responsibility and job to promote, protect, and preserve Egyptian heritage. If that means he "bullies" some archelogists; so be it.

      Again, I say if the pyramids were in America, only American archeolgists would be "permitted" to study them. Same goes for just any other nation of the world (especially China).

      Is there something behind the second door? We'll find out soon enough... but I think it's great that after 3000 years the pyramids still have not surrendered all of their secrets. Even in the technology age, the pyramids hold tight their secrets! I would have said their "last remaining" secrets, but who knows 10 years from now maybe some young Egyptian student will find something else to intrigue us all.

    10. Re:A bit of history here by monkeydo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right. His hand was injured and amputated with a hot peice of metal. The was evidence that the owner of that arm continued to engage in hard lobor for "many years" after the amputation. That doesn't really sound to me like he was a volunteer. You wouldn't kill a slave who was injured but could still work. You cut off his arm and put him back to work. If he dies of infection, who cares.

      They went on to claim that the term "back-breaking labor" may have orginated among those building the pyramids because their bones were so racked and broken. I wonder, what would the bones look like if they were slaves?

      The stupid assertion that the population of the camp was split among men and women is also stupid. Even the dumbest tyrant knows that an all male slave army only last one generation.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    11. Re:A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Is there really that big of a following for the "aliens built the pryamids" theory?

      Yep.. they're called 'pyramidiots' by serious egyptologists. A bit of a running joke.

    12. Re:A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amputation + backbreaking labor = free man? Ummm, not quite a convincing assertion there.

      Doesn't prove anything either way. A very plausible explanation is that he was caught stealing, had a hand chopped off accordingly, and was sold into slavery, possibly as a result of having been caught stealing from royalty or other well-connected sorts.

    13. Re:A bit of history here by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      His hand was not amputated with "a hot piece of metal". It was cauterized with metal (according to the narrator). They probably cut it off with a saw of some sort (which probably was metal but not necessarily hot). The fact that they cauterized with metal and didn't just run the risk of infection indicates to me that this wasn't just your throw away slaves.

      Add to that the quality of food that they were fed along with the speed and quality of the work and you have fairly solid evidence that these were not slaves. The problem is that as Americans (or members of other Modern Western Societies) we can't comprehend being so religiously fanatic as to put ourselves through such torture for our President ( or Prime Minister, etc.). To the ancient Egyptians however, the Pharaoh was God.

      You also don't have to look to far back to see Americans working in practically slave conditions. Watch the History Channel and see how they built the Hoover Dam, Empire State Building, Brooklyn Bridge, etc. These men worked in deadly situations for basically enough money to feed and clothe themselves and their families. You also don't have to go far back to see children working like slaves in this country and it still happens in many 3rd world countries.

    14. Re:A bit of history here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your "fact" that they cauterized the amputation wound with hot metal is just a guess. All we know is that the hand was cut off pretty cleanly, and that the person survived to do very hard work afterwards. The hand was probably cut or sawed off, but beyond that we know NOTHING about how the blood was stopped, how infection was prevented, etc.

      They may have been slaves, they may have been free. The point of the argument is that the absolutely lame justifications for claiming they were free men only make all the other arguments suspect.

    15. Re:A bit of history here by georgewad · · Score: 1

      If your political leader is also your god/goddess, you are a slave.

      --
      Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
    16. Re:A bit of history here by monkeydo · · Score: 2

      When in history were slaves ever considered "disposable?" Second class citizens, yes. You wouldn't cry if they died. But no more disposable than a mule. The modern replacement to slaves would be tractors and I don't see farmers throwing them away either. If yo ucan fix up a slave and make him work for another 20 years, why would you just let him die? That would be stupid especialy since his family (also slaves) would probably be the ones helping him and nursing him back to health.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    17. Re:A bit of history here by ToeDruid · · Score: 1

      The evidence that they presented is pretty lame, but this was a show for the layperson and doesn't go into a lot of detail. There is actually a significant amount of forensic and historical evidence that suggests that the people who built the pyramids weren't slaves at all...most of it gleaned from examination of bone material. Again though...I concure that the evidence they presented on the show was pretty lame :)

      --
      "The difference between meat and fish is that if you beat your fish it dies"
    18. Re:A bit of history here by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      You are thinking of slavery as known in this country. That is only a small example of slavery throughout history. In the US slaves were purchased and had to be transported to the US. In ancient times slaves were often the people of a conquered country and cost the ruler nothing. If you have 80,000 slaves working on a pyramid are you going to make any special effort to fix one? It's not like in the early days of this country when a family had maybe a dozen slaves and each of them held significant value to the family.

  14. Where's Geraldo when you need him. by Misfit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure he would be able to find out what lies behind the vaults of Al TutCapone..

    1. Re:Where's Geraldo when you need him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he may be doing a special soon about the vault of Truman Capote.

    2. Re:Where's Geraldo when you need him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These Geraldo/Capone jokes are about as funny as the "Martians shot it down!" jokes on the NASA stories.

      Imagine how funny a beowulf cluster of these jokes would be!

  15. Very Entertaining Show by syntap · · Score: 1

    My favorite parts:

    1) Here we are in the top chamber of the pyramid. Here's all the graffiti of people here before (some in professional typeface, only thing not on the wall were Golden Arches), but here are some red marks of historical significance.

    2) (After we see it's just another wall). "This is a very important discovery, and I am very pleased with what we found".

    I think they could hear the TVs in America click off from Egypt!!

    1. Re: Very Entertaining Show by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > (After we see it's just another wall). "This is a very important discovery, and I am very pleased with what we found".

      I bet Siggy Freud would have enjoyed it:

      1) everyone gets excited about poking a pole in a hole
      2) hole gets poked
      3) everyone wonders why they were so excited about it two minutes ago
      ...
      4) everyone starts looking forward to the next episode
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  16. And behind the final door is... by darkov2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    a hieroglyph that roughly translates to "Ha-Ha"

    1. Re:And behind the final door is... by AppyPappy · · Score: 2

      I always figured these were air passages that were closed when the pyramids were sealed.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    2. Re:And behind the final door is... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

      a hieroglyph that roughly translates to "Ha-Ha"

      Or, for the purist: Bird, bird, giant eye, pyramid, bird.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    3. Re:And behind the final door is... by BluBrick · · Score: 2

      Or better yet, something along these lines.

      (Aw, c'mon. You just knew someone was gonna post it!)

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    4. Re:And behind the final door is... by deanpole · · Score: 1

      The shaft is an air passage used during pyramid construction. Torches make bad smoke. Behind the door is nothing.

    5. Re:And behind the final door is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ancient etchings that translate roughly to...
      "this space intentionally left blank"

    6. Re:And behind the final door is... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I think "Your ad here" would work better for boosting tourism.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re:And behind the final door is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the shaft be covered in carbon residue if it was used for smoke ventilation?

    8. Re:And behind the final door is... by plasticpixel · · Score: 1
      We had bets on:

      1. Geraldo Rivera

      2. An idiot waving a flash light.

      3. Osama Bin Laden.

      4. Pyramid worker's forgotten lunch.

      5. John Clease.. "Excuse me, but I seem to be stuck..."

    9. Re:And behind the final door is... by return+42 · · Score: 2

      Actually, giant letters of flame spelling out "We apologize for the inconvenience".

    10. Re:And behind the final door is... by DennyK · · Score: 2

      "This Space Intentionally Left Blank"

      ;)

      DennyK

    11. Re:And behind the final door is... by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      Nah, the pyramids were built in a copy of the Build editor for Duke Nukem. It actually says:

      "You're not supposed to be here."

      --
      Dan
    12. Re:And behind the final door is... by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      The pyramids were constructed in levels, and the open spaces inside were laid out as the levels went up, so 99% of the workers would always have been exposed to open air and sunlight.

      A few stone carvers might have needed to go in to put some final touches in, and some people would have needed to carry the sarcophagous and treasure in, but that wouldn't have taken very many people or very long.

      Have the archeologists themselves had any particular problems with ventilation?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    13. Re:And behind the final door is... by Zider · · Score: 1

      "See other side for instructions"

  17. You can keep the prize behind Door #1 or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can trade it for what's behind door #2
    or have $500 in cash!

    (crowd)
    Trade it! Keep it! Take the cash!

    1. Re:You can keep the prize behind Door #1 or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take what's in the box, Monty...

  18. Enter from the outside... by Hates · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From the looks of the all the diagrams showing the location of the so called "hidden" chamber,
    why don't they just carefully excavate into it from the outside, instead of going to all the touble of sending these robots in etc...

    One thing is for sure though, the discovery of the second door allivates fears that the Egyptian goverment had already opened the outer door and explored the secret chamber.

    1. Re:Enter from the outside... by Psiren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      why don't they just carefully excavate into it from the outside, instead of going to all the touble of sending these robots in etc...

      Let me get this straight. You want to explore one of the wonders of the world, by cutting fucking great holes in it?! Please tell me you're not a brain surgeon.

    2. Re:Enter from the outside... by vr · · Score: 2

      it's already fucked up by all the tourism, so why not :(

    3. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your post but your sig makes no sense. You can't live in the future, only the present.

    4. Re:Enter from the outside... by Hates · · Score: 1

      And I did say carefully...

    5. Re:Enter from the outside... by tekrat · · Score: 1

      I agree with your post but your sig makes no sense. You can't live in the future, only the present.

      Well, you know what they say....

      It's not the present, it's the thought that counts.

      BWahhahahahahaha.
      Sorry.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    6. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't they use some kind of sonar to image the pyramid and look for chambers? If they can find a submarine in the Pacific, they should be able to find a cavern in a pyramid.

    7. Re:Enter from the outside... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Wrongo. A good deal of cranial and neurosurgery is performed through the sinus cavity rather than through the skull. In particular, if you ever get a pituitary tumor-- heaven forbid-- your surgeon will use a craneofacial approach to excise it. In other words, he'll use a microscope and some specialized tools to pull the tumor out bit by bit through your nose.

      Good thing you're not a brain surgeon.

    8. Re: Enter from the outside... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > A good deal of cranial and neurosurgery is performed through the sinus cavity rather than through the skull. In particular, if you ever get a pituitary tumor-- heaven forbid-- your surgeon will use a craneofacial approach to excise it. In other words, he'll use a microscope and some specialized tools to pull the tumor out bit by bit through your nose.

      And as anyone who has seen Total Recall will tell you, the procedure involves minimal discomfort to the nose.

      (That scene still hurts when I think about it!)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    9. Re:Enter from the outside... by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Umh, ever thought that there might be some difference between hard solid material like stone, metals, and liquids like water... that just might make this approach unusable?

      If it was possible to use sonar like this, caverns of Bora Bora (in Afganistan, the supposed stronghold of mr. Laden et al) would have been piece of cake to take care of. Just map out the cave structure first, then use whatever firepower you need.

      But I guess you must be right, all the archeologists, wasting decades, not having any scientific insight into how to study pyramids? :-o

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    10. Re:Enter from the outside... by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Ah. Along the lines of old saying "since I already lost my hearing, I don't need sight".

      Amazing as it may seem, but I haven't gotten the feeling that they really have been ruined by tourism. Sure there is some damage, but pyramids are huge objects, and relatively speaking damage is still not all that massive (depend on pyramid I guess; writings probably are the most easily damaged)

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    11. Re:Enter from the outside... by Nept · · Score: 2

      er, that's Tora Bora pal. Bora Bora is actually a rather nice island in the South Pacific. Perhaps you are suggesting Bin Laden may be found at Club Med?

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    12. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to explore one of the wonders of the world, by cutting fucking great holes in it?!

      If I remember correctly, the only remaining wonder of the world.

    13. Re:Enter from the outside... by Yazeran · · Score: 3, Interesting
      And another problem: Sonar work so well in water because water is an almost continuos medium (no cracks or air bubbles). Cracks and other changes in medium density interfeers with sonar performance, and in fact air bubbles are used in countermeasures fired by submarines to fool incomming homing torpedoes.
      A pyramid consists of huge blocks with cracks and small amount of air between the blocks. Although the pyramids are very well engineered, there will always be small amount of air between two piees of stone. This renders sonar useless below the first layer of stone.
      One can measure the depth of the first stone layer with soner (assuming that the outer stones do not have too many cracks), but beyond that, no information wuld be obtained.

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan: to go to Mars one day with a hammer

    14. Re:Enter from the outside... by budalite · · Score: 1

      what the hey. Let's dismantle it from the top down. What an awesome boost to the local economy that would be! They could just build another village right over the original and do everything in reverse!

      Money wouldn't be a problem. Just put a tax on stupid Egyptology TV shows. A buck a show ought to do it. That, or shanghai the NASA budget. The Info on dead Pharoahs and whether stars a million light-years distant have planets seem fairly equally useless. [In fact, I would hazard to guess that every NASA "advance" that has had an actually useful result was related either to keeping the astronauts healthy or it was defense-related. (And who said astronauts were a waste of money...)]

      And, yes, I watched it the bitter end. OK, I'll mod myself down for that...

    15. Re:Enter from the outside... by jms · · Score: 2

      One of the more interesting aspects of the pyramids is that there are NO gaps between the stone "blocks." There is an interesting theory that the stones are actually huge concrete blocks that were cast in place, rather than giant stones that were carved and dragged hundreds of miles.

    16. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the fundamentalist Muslims take over Egypt, they plan to destroy the pyramids anyway. And, no, that's not a joke. They want to do the same thing the f*ckwit Taliban did to those statues in Afghanistan.

    17. Re:Enter from the outside... by AJWM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A more reasonable (if less "interesting") theory is that after the rough surfaces of two stones were abutted, the gap was sawn/planed with a metal tool to smooth the surfaces between them, and then they were shoved the last 1/4 inch or so together. The fact that saw-grooves from such a process can be found on stones underlying the joints is an additional niggling detail that isn't really "interesting".

      --
      -- Alastair
    18. Re: Enter from the outside... by Maledictus · · Score: 1

      "(That scene still hurts when I think about it!)"

      Pah! That scene ain't nothin'. I believe someone once said that having a baby is like pulling a 10lb turkey out of your nose.

      It isn't.

      The turkey's easier.

      --
      Consigned to flames of woe.
    19. Re:Enter from the outside... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      If I remember correctly, the only remaining wonder of the world.

      I was in certain museum in London a number of years ago, while being somewhere that I shouldn't I found the beard of the sphinx. It was in a storage area used random stuff (include mops and brooms and other cleaning maintains things), the beard was hidden behind the door. Nobody was about, so I tookout my pocket knife and chipped off an nice little chunk to keep for myself. I still have one somewhere...

      I think we should take the whole pointy stone build down a put it up in a different country, this will complete confuse an space aliens that didn't build it.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    20. Re:Enter from the outside... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Umh, ever thought that there might be some difference between hard solid material like stone, metals, and liquids like water... that just might make this approach unusable?

      Actually, sonar works quite well through stone. The problem is that cracks and boundaries between different materials cause a lot of reflection and scattering.

      It's _dirt_ that would be a nightmare to send sonar through, but even that would work at low frequencies.

      If it was possible to use sonar like this, caverns of Bora Bora (in Afganistan, the supposed stronghold of mr. Laden et al) would have been piece of cake to take care of.

      Again, this could easily have been done - it would just have taken more work than was practical.

      This kind of technique is used all the time when prospecting for oil. You have a bomb in one place, and a bunch of seismic sensors in others. Set off the bomb, and look for reflections from the kinds of formations that trap oil.

    21. Re:Enter from the outside... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      why don't they just carefully excavate into it from the outside, instead of going to all the touble of sending these robots in etc...

      Let me get this straight. You want to explore one of the wonders of the world, by cutting fucking great holes in it?!

      Another approach that might work would be to take an industrial X-ray device and try to map out voids in the building by the equivalent of CAT. Such machines are already used to do non-destructive inspections of buildings looking for failure (though I doubt they try to send an x-ray beam through hundreds of metres of stone).

      This would take a while, but would provide a reasonably complete low-resolution map of the pyramid's structure. Sink a few shafts to the side of the pyramid, and you can get the underground structure (if any) too.

    22. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got any links? AFAICT, the concrete theory is the only theory (that I'm aware of) that actually fits the evidence.

      Somehow I don't see it being too easy to carve blocks of stone _that_ large, heavy, and perfect -- placing them almost perfectly together (without damaging any of the edges significantly) -- _then_ smoothing the edges back to perfect and pushing it the rest of the way without additional damage to it or surrounding blocks. Thoughts?

    23. Re:Enter from the outside... by Teknon · · Score: 1

      How do you think that an ultrasound works? Granted, rosk is different from flesh, but it should be possible to use some form of remote sensing to figure out what is in the pyaramids.

    24. Re:Enter from the outside... by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      :-)

      Yeah. You're right... what was I thinking. I must have drank too much of Bora Bora cider when I was younger (was popular back in my home country a decade ago or so).

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    25. Re:Enter from the outside... by geekindustries · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you're not a brain surgeon.

      I would hope note, but I actually met a really dumb surgeon once. He said to me "my hamstrings really hurt," but the thing is...he was pointing to his ARM! His ARM! How could a surgeon think his hamstring was in his arm! arg!

      --
      Hard work usually pays off over time, but procrastination pays off now.
    26. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another more plausible theory is that a thousand foot pile of rock looks seemless in a distant photograph, but when you get a closer look, you can see the gaps. That's why stonework like the fortifications at Machu Picchu is so amazing because it doesn't have gaps, unlike the pyramids and most old world structures.

    27. Re:Enter from the outside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The person was just asking a simple question as to whether some other scientific methods could be used to explore the pyramids, you didn't need to be that hostile. Sheesh.

      Pretty sad when someone can't ask a simple question that has occurred to them without being berated for having an idea.

    28. Re:Enter from the outside... by vr · · Score: 2

      I was just beeing sarcastic :)

      Anyway.. I've never actually been to the pyramids myself, but I've heard that they are fscked up on the outside because tourists all take home a piece of it. If you look at pictures of them, it looks as if a giant bird has been nibbling away at them. They look better as you get to the top, probably because the lazy tourists don't wanna go all the way to the top.

  19. Isn't it obvious? by UncleBiggims · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems obvious to me what this shaft is. It leads directly into the Queen's chamber so it must be a laundry shoot. Unfortunately, Khufu's dirty Sun God Underoo's must have been stolen 1000's of years ago.

    1. Re:Isn't it obvious? by FortKnox · · Score: 0, Redundant

      LMAO!!

      Mod this up! Oh man... thanks for making my day with that one! LOL!

      I'm one of the sad people that TiVo'ed it, and had to bear with the incredibly DULL way to explain the pyramids to eventually get to the end for nothing. What a bummer.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this long shaft was one huge carb on a pyramid sized bong?

    3. Re:Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you have yet to discover a fast forward button on your Tivo

    4. Re:Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude

      The Egyptians must've had it worse than us... we build bongs out of everything from coke cans to bicycles, but they were getting the poor to build gigantic stone monolith bongs??

      I guess the Egyptians were an advanced race.

  20. Egyptian Engineers: by Your_Mom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Egyptian Engineer 1: "Hey Ahumhuphet!"
    Egyptian Engineer 2: "Yo!"
    Egyptian Engineer 1: "Check it out, I designed this really long, small passage that leads to a door, then it goes on, and leads to another door!"
    Egyptian Engineer 2: "Why?"
    Egyptian Engineer 1: "...dunno... thought it would be cool"
    Egyptian Engineer 2: "Man, this is like your idea to draw aliens on hieroglyphs! Its not like anyone is ever going to /see/ these things!"

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    1. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2, Funny
      Egyptian Engineer 1: "Check it out, I designed this really long, small passage that leads to a door, then it goes on, and leads to another door!"

      Engineer 1 must be an ancient ancestor of this dude.

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    2. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Egyptian Engineer 2: "Man, this is like your idea to draw aliens on hieroglyphs! Its not like anyone is ever going to /see/ these things!"

      Seriously, doesn't this make you wonder if satire existed in ancient times? We take everything as truth. What if the ancient egyptians were grand pranksters?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by Your_Mom · · Score: 2

      Actaully, I adapted the Alien idea from an old "B.C." comic where one of the cavemen was painting an alien on the wall of a cave saying "Man, this ought to screw with their minds in the future" or something to that extent.

      But seriously, (I read about it in Snow Crash first, and I later read into it more) A lot of the stuff written in pyramids are rubbish, its mostly pro-Egyptian propaganda: "We whooped his butt because we are cool like that!", where they might have had their butts whooped by their opponents. Apparently, some Archeaologists really don't take some Egyptian History too seriously unless collaborated by other sources.

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    4. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


      Egyptian Engineer 2: "Why?"
      Egyptian Engineer 1: "...dunno... thought it would be cool"


      MY GOD! They've discovered the first case mod

    5. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by laserjet · · Score: 2

      As advanced as the Egyptians were, I would be very suprised if they were not skilled in satire comedy.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re: Egyptian Engineers: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > Apparently, some Archeaologists really don't take some Egyptian History too seriously unless collaborated by other sources.

      Herodotos, the "father of history", saw some inscriptions on the pyramids in the Fifth Century BCE, and was apparently told by the tour guides that the inscriptions were a record of all the onions needed to feed the builders.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by Your_Mom · · Score: 0, Troll
      MY GOD! They've discovered the first case mod
      Oh my god. That made my day. Someone mod that up please.
      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    8. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sun = blazing inferno
      Athlon = blazing inferno
      AMD = sun god?

      Hmm....

    9. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Seriously, doesn't this make you wonder if satire existed in ancient times? We take everything as truth. What if the ancient egyptians were grand pranksters?

      My own guess...

      Here, back when the technology for recording TV programs came available in TV studios, they realized they couldn't record everything. So, naturally, they decided only to record stuff that matters. So, the archives now have boring stuff like ballet and other "art" stuff, and no comedies. I suspect the same about ancient manuscripts and writings. They had somewhat limited means of recording anything, so they recorded stuff that "mattered". I'm sure ancient civilizations had their ways of having fun and play with language, too, but they just didn't bother to record all that because either humor was not good according to etiquette (think of it: The Pharaoh was a God on Earth or something, do you think it'd look good in history books if it listed all bad jokes he told to the servants? This thought may have crossed the minds of the ancient scribes... =). or if not, the humor had lower priority.

      Of course, I'm not a historian and don't know the history of comedy, but this is just something that seems to be the case with humans in general. Do you keep all "less serious" bits you made when working on something serious?

      I'm probably wrong in some of this, but I guess people have always had the idea of fun...

    10. Re:Egyptian Engineers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, have you ever seen "Dog, Chimpanzee, and Monkey" from the library of congress archive. Check it out. Stop motion camera (and thus movies) was invented over a *bet* about whether horses feet are all off the ground when they're galloping.

  21. User Friendly Scoops Slashdot! by xdroop · · Score: 2

    Wasn't this the howlingly un-funny sunday cartoon?

    --
    you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    1. Re:User Friendly Scoops Slashdot! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      How can you say User Friendly is un-funny?

      It's a veritable Family Circus of laughs.

    2. Re:User Friendly Scoops Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. Now that's funny.

  22. Re:Humor? by Arnold_Crenshaw · · Score: 1, Funny

    There are much more skillful ways to present that troll. Go back, read some more comic books, and try again.

  23. More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not followed the whole issue, but did they show what the camera saw?

  24. My favorite part . . . by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and I only watched the last 5 minutes or so . . .

    Robot proceeds forward through hole in door . . .

    Excited Host Lady: Describe what's happening now for us!

    Expert: The robot is proceeding forward through the hole in the door.

    Excited Host Lady: Oooooo! Those look like hieroglyphics! Writing on the wall!

    Expert: Cracks. Those are cracks.

    1. Re:My favorite part . . . by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed an earlier part worth seeing, when the sarcophagus was opened to reveal a human skeleton:

      Expert: I hope this will shut the mouths of all thoses idiots who say this place wasn't built by Egyptians.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    2. Re:My favorite part . . . by numatrix · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the preceeding line:

      Excited Host Lady: Oh my gosh, this is the first live discovery of space...

      Sadly, I'm not not making this up That really was a pathetic show.

    3. Re:My favorite part . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who says aliens need to be physical?

      If you do research, most aliens are in fact thought to be non-physical, but they can manifest themselves into the physical because of their superior tech and stuff. Some can even be humans, and that human can even be YOU!

      Frankly, I find both UFO-freaks and so-called critics to both be out of touch with reality (which I believe is much more than just electrons and quarks).

    4. Re:My favorite part . . . by captainboogerhead · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe they're lovingly referred to as "Pyramidiots" by the archeology set.

    5. Re:My favorite part . . . by jmccay · · Score: 2

      Did anyone else notice that the skull of that skeleton was A LOT whiter than the rest of the skeleton? Did that seem odd? I wondwer if there wasn't one in there when they first opened it up (off camera) and they planted the skull so he could say that line.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    6. Re:My favorite part . . . by DragonTHC · · Score: 0

      doesn't this dispel the entire old testament?
      the jews are going to be pissed off about this!

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    7. Re:My favorite part . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember what she was saying, but looking at that 2nd door, I'm CERTAIN there were 2 eyes carved into it. I saw them right away and they were definitely there. So I was quite offended by Slashdot and MSNBC's "ha-ha" attitude towards this discovery.

      Just because you didn't find Gold or Alien Autopsy remains through the hole doesn't mean it's not important. Grow up.

    8. Re:My favorite part . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...and did you notice, the lower jaw was missing? The scull perfectly intact, but the lower jaw has disintegrated?

      Strange, really strange!

    9. Re:My favorite part . . . by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was at first too, but on a closer look, it had just toppled over and was laying on the ground beside it.

      I guess 4500 years or whatever would've been a pretty long time for it to just balance in place...

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    10. Re:My favorite part . . . by Razzious · · Score: 2

      Actually unless my memory of early Sunday School fails me, the Bible does not say that the Iraelites built the Pyramids. It merely says they were Slaves in Egypt. Nothing on the show referred to Egypt not having slaves, only that Slaves did not build the Pyramids.

      Keep in mind also that Israel did not think Egypt was all too terrible. They all wanted to go back when the times were tough in the Desert.

      --
      Razzious Domini
      I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
    11. Re:My favorite part . . . by basso · · Score: 1

      Actually unless my memory of early Sunday School fails me, the Bible does not say that the Iraelites built the Pyramids.

      Right. The pyramids were built long before the time of Ramses II, who is usually identified as the Pharoah of the Exodus.
      Archaeology is now suggesting that much of the history of the Hebrew Bible didn't actually happen.
      The Bible Unearthed provides a good summary of the argument.

    12. Re:My favorite part . . . by Razzious · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Familar with that approach. However there are many and more books suggesting it is. Josephus seems to be the favorite.

      --
      Razzious Domini
      I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
    13. Re:My favorite part . . . by spudnic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, why did they do it in the very last minutes of the show? I understand they had to keep you in anticipation as long as possible, but what if they had found something? Would they have extended the show? My Tivo would have missed it. Surely they wouldn't say, "We just discovered an alian spacecraft behind the door, but that's all the time we have so we better say goodnight."

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    14. Re:My favorite part . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand - perhaps the "idiots" being referred to, are not those claiming the Israelites built the pyramids... but those who thing aliens did.

    15. Re:My favorite part . . . by Etrigan_696 · · Score: 1

      Because obviously, the had already looked through the little hole and saw there was no alien spacecraft...

      Or they found the craft and moved it, so it is now sitting in a huge hangar burried under an Arizona desert; right next to the Ark of the Covenant, half a million alien fetuses (fetii?), Hitler's living brain, the Time Machine H.G. Wells wrote about, Jules Verne's Nautilus and the Stargate they found buried a half mile from the pyramids at Giza.

  25. Learning about ancient cultures by Washizu · · Score: 5, Funny

    They might find more information about the ancient race of skeleton people.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
  26. And behind *that* door... by payndz2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...a trapped Lara Croft beats desperately on the heavy stone slab as Osiris advances on her!

  27. ok by Apreche · · Score: 0, Interesting

    So can someone explain to me why they didn't open the door? I mean seriously. If there is a big secret that nobody knows wouldn't you want to find out immediately? How can you possibly resist opening the door? What kind of idiot finds a new door and doesn't open it? I mean isn't that what video games teach us, open every door as soon as you find it!
    And don't they have sonar? They should use it to "see" what is behind the door. Whether it's an empty room or a treasure hoarde with a curse I doubt anything bad can come of opening a door. That is I don't believe in the supernatural. I'm sure the archaelogists don't either.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they didn't really "open" the first door. The drilled a hole in it and stuck a camera through it.

    2. Re:ok by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2

      Because the robot won't fit through this one inch hole. For the next try, they should build a robot that is able to drill a hole big enough for itself to move through.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    3. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because they now need to explore the opposite shaft (which has never been fully explored) to get the red key and then return to the orginal shaft and open the second door.

    4. Re:ok by gosand · · Score: 5, Informative
      So can someone explain to me why they didn't open the door? I mean seriously.

      Short answer - RTFA!

      Did you even see the show? The "door" is in an 8"x8" square shaft that entends up at about a 45 degree angle. I think the shaft was 200 ft long.

      Over months, they built a special robot that chould get to the door, and it tried to move it. They used some kind of sonar to determine that the door was only 3" thick, so they tested out a device to drill a 3" hole in it, so they could insert a small camera and light.

      So instead of thinking that you are so clever, maybe you should have watched the show, or at least read the article before going off on some pseudo tirade.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:ok by Tom2K2 · · Score: 1

      The reason why they can't open the door is because it is a giant block of stone that weighs more than what the little rover can handle. Plus it was dropped from above the shaft, and features a couple of (iron?) pegs that acts as a one way lock. I thought that on their last expedition they said that they were quite certain that a chamber was on the other side. Guess they were wrong. As another poster stated, why not just dig in from the outside if they are so hellbent on knowing whats on the other side. All in all, this is still pertty cool, as the first expedition up the shaft was the inspiration for me to design and build a little PC controlled version of Upuaut III. (the name of the robot). It had most of the features of the original, at 1000 times less the cost...

      My sig is on the other side of the door...

    6. Re:ok by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      I mean isn't that what video games teach us, open every door as soon as you find it!

      You've never played a resident evil, or system shock 2, have you?

      First, you clear out the area, ensure its secure, and always carry a big stick when opening up a newfound door.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    7. Re:ok by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2
      Well, for starters, the door is more like a stone slab. And secondly, you don't want the Skeleton People who could be hiding behind the door to jump out and get you. So you let the robot drill a little hole and poke it's camera through.

      Besides, as Indiana Jones taught us, 8"x8" holes in the wall are normally filled with bugs. And who wants to stick their arms into holes filled with bugs.

    8. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no reason to be an asshole about it... its an honest question... not like we can click on a link and watch the show

    9. Re:ok by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Alright smart guy, you want to know why!? I'll tell you why! Cause sonar CAN'T SEE CURSES!!! Sheesh, still having to explain the obvious.

    10. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opening the second door would be a violation of the DMCA.

    11. Re:ok by MoneyT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because the hyroglyphs on the second door said:

      "By breaking this seal you agree to the terms of the license contained herein.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:ok by gosand · · Score: 2
      no reason to be an asshole about it... its an honest question... not like we can click on a link and watch the show

      ROFL. You can't?
      Hmm, did you even follow the link to the story on MSNBC? The picture at the top of the article SHOWS the shaft, and the guy inserting the robot into it. Right next to it is a VIDEO that you can click to watch what happens when it inserts the camera into the hole. Or how about the article on the BBC which shows where the shaft is in the pyramid, and more pictures? All I said was RTFA before making smart-ass comments about it. The person I was replying to did not ask an honest question, he asked a smart-ass question and made a bunch of dumb comments. Since you are too lazy to read the article, you are probably too lazy to read the comments, so here they are:
      So can someone explain to me why they didn't open the door? I mean seriously. If there is a big secret that nobody knows wouldn't you want to find out immediately? How can you possibly resist opening the door? What kind of idiot finds a new door and doesn't open it? I mean isn't that what video games teach us, open every door as soon as you find it! And don't they have sonar? They should use it to "see" what is behind the door. Whether it's an empty room or a treasure hoarde with a curse I doubt anything bad can come of opening a door. That is I don't believe in the supernatural. I'm sure the archaelogists don't either.

      Now, reading it again, does it sound like such an honest question?

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    13. Re:ok by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Well, because the longer they prolong finding out what's in there, the longer one of the "Big Egyptian Mysteries" will be around for discussing on Discovery channel, TLC, Nat Geo, etc.

      If they were simply to go in and look, they'd deprive themselves of lots of ratings, not to mention the wanker from the Supreme Egyptian so-and-so being able to grandstand (The Pyramid Nazi - "No Explorations for YOU!")

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    14. Re:ok by mshiltonj · · Score: 2

      If there is a big secret that nobody knows wouldn't you want to find out immediately? How can you possibly resist opening the door? What kind of idiot finds a new door and doesn't open it?

      They didn't have a Wizard there to cast a Detect Magic spell, and there was no Thief to check for traps. After enough PCs die a horrible screaming death at the hands a cackling DM, you learn to be more cautious of opening doors willy-nilly.

      You must be a Dwarf. You guys always rush into things too quickly. The Cleric can only cast so many Heal Light Wounds, Man! Be more careful.

    15. Re:ok by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      "By breaking this seal you agree to the terms of the license contained herein."

      How about "By breaking this seal you agree to the terms and conditions of the curse contained herein. You further agree to hold Khufu blameless for any misfortunes resulting from this curse. Khufu's curse is not suitable for use in life support systems or nuclear power plants."

    16. Re:ok by Reziac · · Score: 2

      And beware of the Revenants. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, it goes:
      By breaking this seal you agree to the terms of the curse contained herein.

  28. Alright, you lazy bastards!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit wasting your time reading Slashdot!

    Go and patch your Linux boxes. The "Slapper Worm" is continuing to spread.

    If you haven't heard of it before, the "Slapper Worm" exploits a vulnerability in OpenSSL on Linux boxes running Apache web servers.

    Patch your damn box!

  29. Poll by syntap · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's Behind Door #2?

    1) Anna Nicole Smith's Dietician
    2) Steve Case's New Office
    3) Kernel 2.6.0
    4) A Stash of PS2 Network Adapters
    5) CowbotNeal's Playroom

    1. Re:Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or:

      6) A copy of the Altair Basic source code :-)

    2. Re:Poll by tjensor · · Score: 2, Funny

      And inevitabley... 6) ??? 7) Profit!

      --
      <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
    3. Re:Poll by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 1

      6) Duke Nukem Forever!!! :)

      --
      Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
    4. Re:Poll by jimlintott · · Score: 2, Funny

      6) Door #3

    5. Re:Poll by smead · · Score: 1

      nothing!!!
      absolutly nothing!!!
      you so stuuuuuuuuupiiiid!

  30. Overblown media garbage by jobugeek · · Score: 1

    They spent the entire time telling how LIVE everything was, but the during the commerical time-outs the preview for the next segment hinted to what was next. Either someone had some really good forshadowing or it was all BS.

    --
    I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    1. Re:Overblown media garbage by janda · · Score: 1

      It was shown live, in Egypt.

      Personally, I wish they would have forked out the dough for a worldwide live broadcast.

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    2. Re:Overblown media garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't this already recorded and shown live on Sunday(?) on the National Geographic channel? I think Fox just threw in their own commercials.

      I only caught the last 10 minutes of it and I thought it was inexcusably dumb. I can understand Fox spewing this glorified/sensationalist crap, but I expected better from National Geographic. Laura Greene was hot, though.

  31. Fox will be happy by Zeppelingb · · Score: 1

    By the way the show went...It seems that Fox / the discovery channel would love to have another live show like this to boost ratings. Although the archaeologist might have a heart attack if he has to wait for some cheesy ancient egypt reenactment segment before everything he does.

    1. Re:Fox will be happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather they sent a camera into the chamber beneath the two paws on the sphinx. They just did a sonar of it and it appears Ed Casey was close in it location. Unfortunately, it's caught up in politics.

  32. well obviously by nege · · Score: 1

    its called an anteroom. The next one surely leads to treasure!

  33. My special thoughts by Jupiter9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe I watched this. I knew it was going to be the worst 2hours of television I've ever seen, but still I was sucked in.

    How come they didn't take the camera rover out and put the one with the drill in there to drill a hole through the new found door?

    I thought they had xrayed the door already, did they know that the new door was there?

    How many doors and how many specials will it take to reach the secret chamber?

    Who was that British-accent babe commentator? Did any other guys here want to drive their rover up her secret chamber?

    --

    --
    Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    1. Re:My special thoughts by syukton · · Score: 1

      ::raises hand::

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    2. Re:My special thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who was that British-accent babe commentator? Did any other guys here want to drive their rover up her secret chamber?

      If you get the National Geographic Channel, you can find here on National Geographic Today, everyday.

      And...um... yes.

    3. Re:My special thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *quietly raises hand*

    4. Re:My special thoughts by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I knew it was going to be the worst 2hours of television I've ever seen, but still I was sucked in.

      It wasn't so bad, since they sneaked in a little educational stuff in the process.

      I would have liked to have seen some of the graffiti, also; it's like being at a university and finding graffiti done by a student 100 years ago.

      How come they didn't take the camera rover out and put the one with the drill in there to drill a hole through the new found door?

      They only drilled a small hole through the first door. The drill wouldn't reach through the hole in the first door to drill in the second, and there are also concerns about making sure the material of the second door is appropriate for drilling. They would have to remove or destroy the first door to get to the second.

      I thought they had xrayed the door already, did they know that the new door was there?

      They were able to measure the approximate thickness of the first door, but I don't think it told them much beyond that.

      How many doors and how many specials will it take to reach the secret chamber?

      It depends how much advertising they can sell.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    5. Re:My special thoughts by agentmouthwash · · Score: 1

      Fox must of been happy that they found a second door because now they can have another 2 hour episode about what's behind that.. which will most likely be... Another door!!!!

    6. Re:My special thoughts by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Who was that British-accent babe commentator?

      I don't know who she was. But about two thirds of the way through I noticed that the producers had picked matching shirts for her and the other host. Odd.

    7. Re:My special thoughts by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Who was that British-accent babe commentator?

      Her name is Laura Greene, go a google-ing...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:My special thoughts by Rand+Race · · Score: 3, Funny
      First door was in the way.

      They sonar mapped the first door. That didn't tell them anything but how thick the first door was.

      I'd guess one more door and no more specials.

      I kept expecting her to say "The rover will be at the door in a couple of minutes so while we wait I'll back up into a corner and bounce up and down".

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    9. Re:My special thoughts by newr00tic · · Score: 0

      THE ROBOT -- dubbed the Chick Rover -- took two hours to crawl through a narrow shaft, drilling through a door at the end and inserting a camera connected to a thin cable to see what was behind it. "It's another sealed door ... This is very important," said an excited Zaphy Smartass, the director of Egypt's Suprised Council of Atrocities..

      --
      A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    10. Re:My special thoughts by MrSeb · · Score: 1

      She's an EX-British-TV presenter. She wasn't very good, to be honest, and got bounced around a lot -- even onto Channel 5 (like the C-Class Celebrity graveyard).

      Changing country was probably a good idea...

    11. Re:My special thoughts by Luddite+Slayer · · Score: 1

      she looked like a lollipop! Bug ole head and a twig for a body. I like something to grab onto. You know, a little meat with my potatos.

      --

      My personality is like a coupon, it's 10% off.

    12. Re:My special thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I knew it was going to be the worst 2hours of television I've ever seen,


      You must have missed the "Al Capone's Vault" special several years ago. Same idea, minus the educational bits, and with Geraldo Rivera. Also without the possibility for a sequel since all they found were some old bottles, I think.
    13. Re:My special thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've seen more meat on antlers"
      -Dr. Phil

    14. Re:My special thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like something to grab onto. You know, a little meat with my potatos.

      You mean a little potatos with your meat.

  34. They could not by oval_pants · · Score: 1

    have written a better "Simpsons" episode.

    Homer the Narrator: After two hours of the robot crawling through the tunning and drilling a tiny hole through the door we finally are about to reveal the pyramid's most treasured secret

    Homer the Narrator: D'OH!.

  35. Yeah, but... by torpor · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... what's behind the *other* door?

    ANOTHER DOOR! AND ANOTHER!! AND ANOTHER AND ANOTHER AND ANOTHER!!!!

    I'm sure of it.

    We've finally discovered the hole in the universe that will revolutionize our perception of reality: behind every opened door is another door!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Well, an endless hole sure would solve the world's problem of where to throw away all their promotional AOL cd's.

      It'd just make my day if the doors made the same sound when they open and close as AIM does when a buddy signs on or off.

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1
      We've finally discovered the hole in the universe that will revolutionize our perception of reality: behind every opened door is another door!

      We've known that for years... haven't you ever watched Donald Duck in Mathmagicland? :)

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    3. Re:Yeah, but... by British · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should just give up and leave the robot inside there.

      Then, hundreds of years from now, explorers will find it, and think ancient Egyptians had robot technology, completely skewing world history up.

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      ... what's behind the *other* door?

      There could have been an inscription, or reasonable equivalent, on the other side of the door they drilled through last night. Disappointing they didn't think to check...

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by base2op · · Score: 1

      I'd be a little goatse.cx wary after the third door. : /

    6. Re:Yeah, but... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      There could have been an inscription, or reasonable equivalent, on the other side of the door they drilled through last night. Disappointing they didn't think to check...
      EXIT BY OTHER END
  36. Sorry, Indiana Jones... by necrognome · · Score: 1

    But our princess is in another castle.

    --


    Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    1. Re:Sorry, Indiana Jones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way this deserves a (5, funny). The villagers demand a change ;) I cracked up over this, am I the only one? haha, where are all you nintendo fans?

  37. Re:Humor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have seen "The Mummy" one time too often.

  38. Why open the over-seers coffin at the same time? by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Because they strongly suspected piercing the door would be a disappointment?

    This show bugged me because they dole out hard information so sparingly. Who cares whether Ms and Mr Brit announcer are short of breath. Why make us wait so long to see the CGI tour of the pyramids?

    If this thing wasn't broadcast live, if they had cut back on the breathless chatter from the announcers, the informational part of this broadcast could have fit in half an hour.

  39. Re:Humor? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    Having such a well concealed room at the end of a completely impassable tunnel which in turn is blocked by two huge stone doors screams: "DO NOT ENTER! DANGER!" to anyone who's not blinded by the belief in our science.

    Actually, richly stocked and securely guarded tombs meant to the ancient egyptians that their eternal spirits would continue to enjoy a luxurious existence even after death. The only threat present to ancient graverobbers was the potential of pulling their own arms off (Bender style) while trying to move those slabs without heavy machinery.

    Why can't we just leave things as they are?

    <technologyrant>Blah blah blah</technologyrant>

  40. An appropriate quote by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

    "If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite."--William Blake

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  41. Worst radio advert ever by Andy_R · · Score: 2

    Here in Britain, National Geographic are showing the 'live' exploration time-shifted to peak viewing hours tonight.

    I just heard a huge dramatic trailer for the show on my radio, which started just after the newsman announced "...huge disappointment, there was nothing to see." :-)

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Worst radio advert ever by TFloore · · Score: 2

      Ahh... now you know why I hated NBC's coverage of the Sydney Olympics in America. They did the same thing, showed taped events as if they were live.

      The dishonesty of the whole process turned my stomach.

      NBC has the contract for showing the Olympics in the US until 2012? *sigh* That's a long time to boycott them, dangit.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
  42. Somewhere... by blixel · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's another door.

    Somewhere from the great beyond some dead Pharoh is laughing his ass off.

  43. Since MSNBC apparently cant cope with the traffic. by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 1

    Here's the story on the BBC

  44. Bugs Bunny by docbrown42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    After watching the show last night, why do I suddenly think of Yosimite Sam opening door after door, while Bugs nails up new doors on the other end?

    -Ed

    docbrown.net NEW!
    Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
    1. Re:Bugs Bunny by u8nogard · · Score: 1


      And in that cartoon, what is at the end of all those doors awaiting Yosimite Sam? TNT. You suppose that they will be finding the same? *grin

    2. Re:Bugs Bunny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, buddy, put your fuckin' sig where it belongs

  45. Oh man... by Yuioup · · Score: 1

    WHY DON'T THEY JUST BREAK OPEN THE SECOND DOOR!!!

    Don't tell me it's going to take another year before they decide to drill the second hole.

    Why did they take so much time in the first place?

    Yuioup

    1. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > WHY DON'T THEY JUST BREAK OPEN THE SECOND DOOR!!!

      Because the robot won't *fit* through the tiny hole it drilled in the *first* door you idiot!

      Sheeesh!

    2. Re:Oh man... by Yuioup · · Score: 1

      Do'h!

  46. Behind the second door..... Is by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    Well, That tunnel will take another turn after the door... but once you get into the chamber, you will find the warp shuttle that I'm going to go back in time and have built into the top of the pyramid.

    Yes, I'm Crazy!!!!!

    Now, I want my warp shuttle back so I can go put it there in the first place. Now, where were those slingshot calcs... ya know the ones about going around the sun at warp... to do a time warp.

    I'm Sorry, I had to make this story geek related somehow.

    1. Re:Behind the second door..... Is by bomb_number_20 · · Score: 1

      welcome to my world...

      i bought the stargate season 2 dvd set the day it came out (a tuesday evening). i had watched all 22 episodes by the end of the second day (thursday). im guessing you are doing the same thing.

      1969 is one of my favorite episodes in the set. watching that many episodes in such a short time does strange things to your head.

      --
      That's ok, Jesus likes me anyway.
  47. $250k for the robot? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2
    I'm curious: how the heck do you spend $250k on a robot to crawl 200 feet and show you video footage? I'm not at all knowledgeable about this -- someone here must know why I'm wrong to think that's a lot of money.

    (I'll stop myself from explaining my plan to use a webcam, my Pentium running Linux, 20 10-foot USB extension cords, and a wind-up NunZilla to explore the corridor...)

    1. Re:$250k for the robot? by janda · · Score: 1

      High price == validation that you're performing "real science".

      Take a look at the science post from the other day about how they've broken the speed of light using off-the-shelf parts. No _respectable_ scientist would do that. Gotta have those grants.

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    2. Re:$250k for the robot? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 3, Informative
      Uh, maybe because the robot was originally designed to find survivors in collapsed buildings and this pyramid thing was pretty much free publicity? (and a cakewalk for the bot).

      From one of the articles:

      Before the television broadcast, measuring apparatus on the robot, similar to those used to search for World Trade Center survivors, found the block was only 3 inches (7.6 centimeters) thick, encouraging the suggestion that it might in fact have been a door leading to another chamber or hidden treasures.
      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:$250k for the robot? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Aha...thanks.

    4. Re:$250k for the robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that a remotely capable lego hacker could make one of them out of a couple of mindstorms sets and a few custom bits and pieces has absolutely nothing to do with it...

    5. Re:$250k for the robot? by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      and a cakewalk for the bot

      Except it wasn't a cakewalk for the bot. There was a two-inch step in the middle of the passage and the robot's handlers had a great deal of strife with that. Every time they tried to make it go over a step, it would fall over.

      Finally, in a remarkable display of ingenuity, they decided that, rather than trying to fix the robot to do what it was supposed to be able to do, they'd just stick a ramp inside so it could roll up. This provided some wonderfully dramatic television as the techies described how difficult it had been to ensure the ramp was precision engineered so as not to make it any more difficult for the poor little critter.

      Somehow, that little precious item makes me doubt it's quite up to the standard of anything used in real search-and-rescue operations.

    6. Re:$250k for the robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of hardware guys. A couple of software guys. 6 months. Travel expenses. Some equipment. Oops -- there goes the $250k. What was the question again?

      People seem to forget that it's fricking expensive to develop technology.

      b.g.

    7. Re:$250k for the robot? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Forgeting the fact that robots simmilar to this one have been in use for quite some time. Out town only spent $25,000 on their sewer crawler. Same basic idea, except the pyramid bot is smaller and has a drill. I don't see that racking up the price that high

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    8. Re:$250k for the robot? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2

      Except that one of it's mates was used in the WTC rubble, which means that it's been used in at least one real search and rescue. (Actually closer to search and recovery, but that's not all that different.)

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    9. Re:$250k for the robot? by archen · · Score: 1

      Purchased from NASA's used robot depo?

      Hell I'd sell them a remote camera strapped to some RC car from Radio shack, but that certainly wouldn't make it seem like a "high tech excavation". The robot is more about ratings than practicality.

    10. Re:$250k for the robot? by rhfrommn · · Score: 1

      They should get a battlebot! One with a big pickaxe would do the job.

      --
      My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
    11. Re:$250k for the robot? by CrayDrygu · · Score: 2
      Um, dude... the sentence you quoted a couple posts ago rather clearly states that the measuring apparatus is similar to the ones used for the WTC rubble. It does not say that the robot is what was used, or that it was an exact match.
      ...measuring apparatus on the robot, similar to those used to search for World Trade Center survivors, found the block was only 3 inches (7.6 centimeters) thick...
      --

      --
      "I personal[ly] think Unix is "superior" because on LSD it tastes like Blue." -- jbarnett

    12. Re:$250k for the robot? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      That sentence needs work. I see how you read it as:

      measuring apparatus .... similar to those used to search..

      I read it as:

      ...the robot, similar to those used to search for...

      at least one TV commentator was using the same reading as I was. Anybody have a reference as to which reading is correct?

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    13. Re:$250k for the robot? by Teknon · · Score: 1

      Make it smaller, and add functionality - that can bring the price up real fast.

    14. Re:$250k for the robot? by atam · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am worng. But I remembered that the 2-inch step was there last time when the German robot team tried to run the shaft. They almost got stuck as well. Won't you think they will prepare for it this time. Maybe they should re-watch the old footage first.

  48. Yeah, uh, what a great idea... by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    It'd be much better to have the scientists pulverize some potential load-bearing walls instead of just working their way in through cooridors that are already in place. It's just a pyramid after all - who cares if we destroy it in the process of revealing its secrets. There's plenty more after we're through with this one!

    --
    Why bother.
  49. And behind that door... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

    The Stargate!

    That extra door is just a plaster mockup the technicians from Cheyenne Mountain left behind.

  50. Really... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    It's just an old abandoned set from the TV show "Get Smart".

    Should keep them busy for a while, anyway.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Really... by technomom · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing.

      They'll open the second door and come across the Cone of Silence.

  51. what I really want to know.... by dmnic · · Score: 1

    for those who watched the original "LIVE" special where they originally found the first door, is what happened to the piece of wood laying in front of the door?
    from lots of reading concerning Dr. Hawass zealoutus "egyptians did it all by themselves, etc....", it seems this piece of wood could be the end-all of the discussion(what is the carbon dating of the wood?), but then again, they never made *1* mention of it last night.

    as mentioned in a previous post, Dr. Hawass does want to be the one-and-only person with any say-so regarding anything to do with ancient Egypt...even when he refuses to believe scientific fact.

    1. Re:what I really want to know.... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Doctor Hawass is the site manager for the Giza necropolis. All excavations on the site are his responsibility.

      The Egyptians are naturally very protective over their sites because of the way they were repeatedly screwed during the 19th and 20th centuries, when the best stuff was taken out of the country and ended up in the Louvre, British Museum or the Metropolitan Museum.

      And this isn't just any monument, this is the most famous ancient monument in the World. There is no way they will let foreigners run the show.

      I don't imagine the British would be any different if someone wanted to work on Stonehenge, or the Americans if someone wanted to excavate - errr... um... (cheap gag)

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    2. Re:what I really want to know.... by dmnic · · Score: 1

      true, but Hawass isnt even respected as a true archeaologist outside of egyptian circles.

      this still doesnt answer the question of the piece of wood originally found in front of the first door a few years ago...

    3. Re:what I really want to know.... by AJWM · · Score: 2

      You're confusing the two shafts. The "door" is at the top of the south shaft. The north shaft has a length of wood at the 45-degree corner, one end of which was presumably broken off by Wayman Dixon's probing in 1872 (the piece he brought back with the couple of artifacts that are now in the British Museum).

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:what I really want to know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      or the Americans if someone wanted to excavate - errr... um... (cheap gag)

      Cahokia burial mounds?

  52. 2 hours of my life i'll never get back... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2

    My favorite "startling revelation" in the program had to be the bit where the "discovered" that in order to feed the huge workforce, they simply took the way they did things around the house and did them on a much larger scale.

    I figure sixth graders could have come up with everything they said. Sad really.

    1. Re:2 hours of my life i'll never get back... by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1
      My favorite "startling revelation" in the program had to be the bit where the "discovered" that in order to feed the huge workforce, they simply took the way they did things around the house and did them on a much larger scale.


      Apparently you missed the point of that segment. What they were remarking about was that rather than build several giant assembly-line bakeries, they built hundreds of home kitchen style bakeries.
      --
      All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  53. Re:well obviously You mean anitclimax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more likely.

  54. World 3-3 by alexmogil · · Score: 1
    This must be Lenny Koopa's Castle.

    Obviously they took the wrong path. Grab the fire flower, jump over the drawbridge and dodge the two fireballs, hit the two Goombas, and go down the first pipe, don't go around it. If you miss the pipe and go up the shaft you just hit a dead end and you pretty much won't have time to go back.

    --
    A winner is you!
  55. No! Dont open it! by cHiphead · · Score: 0

    Its a gateway to hell!

    Don't you people know anything?! Let's be ready, unlike everyone else in all the movies. have a high yield nuke on standby 'just in case' and plenty of marines ready to chopper in and kick their asses doom style. Wait a minute... is this all a part of iD software's marketing plan for doom 3... ?

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  56. Two running themes on the night... by RebelTycoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here are more beer pots... They must of contained beer...

    And, look at the fingerprints... Surely Eygptians built this... My question is, wouldn't they have done their best to make sure flat surfaces were just that, flat, and free of fingerprints, because I would think fingerprints would make the thing look ugly.

    Next point which really got to me was the fact that NO SLAVES were used and that it was a labor of love... That's such BULLSHIT. The evidence presented allows one to conclude several facts.

    1) There was good food... Meats, fish, probably fruit. BUT was there enough for all? This I doubt. The better food was either a reward for the most productive teams OR for the skilled workers.

    2) There were dorms... But only for about 2,000... This would mean an estimated 23,000 had to sleep elsewhere... Again leading to a conclusion of two or three possible workforces.

    3) "Advanced" medical surgery was available... BUT for who? The skilled workers or the slave mules?

    My conclusions...
    1) There were slaves, used as mules to get the stones into near position.
    2) Skilled workers positioned blocks accurately, these would receive the medical treatment and better accomodations.
    3) Managers... All factories have them, why wouldn't the "advanced" Eygptians... Of course managers and overseers would be taken care of.

    Better food was used for feeding the skilled and managers, and used as a reward for top performing slaves...

    1. Re:Two running themes on the night... by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it was more about religious fervor. Which is a type of slavery.

      Probably happened like this:
      Scholars calculate the eclipse down to the minute and then.

      "I am all mighty pharoah, build me a pyramid, or I will hide sun!"

      "Yeah right!"

      "Okay, you asked for it! *waves hands*"

      "HOLY SHIT!! OH PLEASE MAKE IT COME BACK!! WE PROMISE TO BE GOOD!"

      "Hmm... Well, I am a benevolent god, so, if you work real hard..."

      "Oh we will!"

      *waits for scholars to give signal* *pharoah waves hand*

      "OH THANK YOU PHAROAH!!! BACK TO WORK!"

    2. Re:Two running themes on the night... by mikerich · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Without any access to the programme itself...

      Here are more beer pots... They must of contained beer...

      We know the Egyptians drank beer in preference to water as the fermentation process helped purify the water and reduced the risk of waterborne disease.

      And, look at the fingerprints... Surely Eygptians built this... My question is, wouldn't they have done their best to make sure flat surfaces were just that, flat, and free of fingerprints, because I would think fingerprints would make the thing look ugly.

      No, the interior of the Pyramid is really quite roughly hewn (albeit a lot better than most pyramids). Only the outer courses were finished to a fine standard after the blocks were lain in-situ. Constructing the big pyramids required blocks to be placed every minute or so, there was no time to do anything other than the roughest of shaping.

      Next point which really got to me was the fact that NO SLAVES were used and that it was a labor of love... That's such BULLSHIT. The evidence presented allows one to conclude several facts.

      Perhaps they didn't show all the evidence?

      1) There was good food... Meats, fish, probably fruit. BUT was there enough for all? This I doubt. The better food was either a reward for the most productive teams OR for the skilled workers.

      Sorry wrong. Not only was Egypt one of the traditional breadbaskets of the Near East (by Roman times it fed large parts of the Empire), but a good portion of the land was owned by Pharaoh (we have the estate records). This food was used to feed people on state projects.

      Meat would have been rarer than in the modern diet, but there would have plenty of vegetarian foods, beer and bread to keep people going.

      2) There were dorms... But only for about 2,000... This would mean an estimated 23,000 had to sleep elsewhere... Again leading to a conclusion of two or three possible workforces.

      Sorry, wrong again. The Gizan necropolis has never been completely excavated. Large amounts of the site - including temples are now buried by modern developments, other parts of the site are buried under the waste from the quarrying in later times. There is plenty of room for more habitation. Your argument is like saying because we've only found a few houses in Yorks' Coppergate there can't have been a Viking city called Jorvik.

      3) "Advanced" medical surgery was available... BUT for who? The skilled workers or the slave mules?

      Egyptian medicine was the highest regarded in the Ancient World. Imhotep, architect of the first pyramid was also renowned for his medical learning and much later identified with Aescapulus by the Greeks.

      This was a state organisation, the Pharaoh would have been interested in a healthy workforce. There is no reason to suspect that health care was anything other than good.

      The Pyramids are social engineering on an epic scale. For one third of the year the Nile would have flooded all of the arable land in the country. 90% of the workforce would have been unemployed and restive - so they were put to work on the Pyramids. In exchange, they got food and the country remained stable.

      Unfortunately, the structures also sucked wealth out of the economy and helped bring about the disintegration of the Old Kingdom.

      One problem we have looking back at Egypt is that we try to put our own processes into the heads of people who thought and worked in a very different way. We know that the Romans and the Greeks used slaves to construct their vast projects; we've read the Bible and seen how Exodus talks about Israelite slaves in Egypt and we colour our image with those thoughts.

      The Egyptians did keep slaves, they weren't squeamish about the fact and their temples and tombs are decorated with images of slaves.

      During the Old Kingdom Egypt was a very isolated country and did not have ready access to foreign populations for slaves. Slavery becomes much more common (although never as common as in Greece and Rome) in the Middle and New Kingdoms as Egypt broke out of its isolation and began to invade Nubia (to the South), Libya (to the West) and the modern Near East.

      But we don't find any signs of slavery on the pyramid sites. We do find household junk, dockets, mentions of the origins of the workforce and so on. We know they were Egyptian workers.

      My conclusions... 1) There were slaves, used as mules to get the stones into near position.

      Unskilled labourers certainly with skilled team masters, but not slaves.

      2) Skilled workers positioned blocks accurately, these would receive the medical treatment and better accomodations.

      Modern reconstructions show that unskilled labourers working under supervision of skilled workers can perform the task to the required precision.

      3) Managers... All factories have them, why wouldn't the "advanced" Eygptians... Of course managers and overseers would be taken care of. Better food was used for feeding the skilled and managers, and used as a reward for top performing slaves...

      There were managers, we have their tombs. Of course they had better food (more meat, wine that sort of thing), but that doesn't mean the people working for them were slaves any more than the fact that the head of a company earns more than his staff, enjoys fine Bordeaux and has a house in the Hamptons.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    3. Re:Two running themes on the night... by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

      Noted Egyptologist OLFHQ provided me with the following transcript:

      "fingerprints show that the sla .. er .. workers actually used hands when ordered by the ali ... er ... pharohs"
    4. Re:Two running themes on the night... by lemox · · Score: 2

      While I agree with the majority of your comment, it still seems to me that it's a dubious proposition to say with certainty that the workers weren't slaves merely because they were treated well. To me, the word "slave" implies forced laborer. When you're talking about work that hard, it makes sense to keep you workers fit, slave or no. They were skilled workers, not easily replaceable. I simply find it hard to believe that if a pyramid worker tired of his profession, he would be allowed to leave and go on about his business. To me that's slavery.

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

    5. Re:Two running themes on the night... by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      Your argument is like saying because we've only found a few houses in Yorks' Coppergate there can't have been a Viking city called Jorvik.
      Pushaw. Only the most brutish ignoramous could utter a remark so vapid.
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      We know the Egyptians drank beer in preference to water as the fermentation process helped purify the water and reduced the risk of waterborne disease.

      Yeah, uh, me too! That's why I drink beer like it's water.

    7. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so can anyone explain to me how the egyptians managed to build these pyramids if they were constantly pissed??? i can barely walk after 8 pints never mind haul stone blocks...

    8. Re:Two running themes on the night... by unorthod0x · · Score: 1
      Here are more beer pots... They must of contained beer...

      How many of us can work without the help of beer? :)
      Next point which really got to me was the fact that NO SLAVES were used and that it was a labor of love... That's such BULLSHIT. The evidence presented allows one to conclude several facts.

      I am SO with you on this one. Even if no slaves were used to build the pyramids, why would one assume it was a labour of love? This show consistently focussed on creating its own narrative, picking and chosing conclusions out of a hat without presenting the viewer with any other [equally viable] alternatives..

      One of the main supporting bits of 'evidence' for the 'labour of love' theory was that they found entire families near by.. However, they didn't ask the important questions: Is it possible that entire families were slaves? Is it possible that the families found had nothing to do with the building of the pyramids whatsoever?
      1) There was good food... Meats, fish, probably fruit. BUT was there enough for all? This I doubt. The better food was either a reward for the most productive teams OR for the skilled workers.

      2) There were dorms... But only for about 2,000... This would mean an estimated 23,000 had to sleep elsewhere... Again leading to a conclusion of two or three possible workforces.

      3) "Advanced" medical surgery was available... BUT for who? The skilled workers or the slave mules?

      I'm no egyptologist/archeologist, but the 'evidence' presented in this program in regard to your points outlined above was not even close to being satisfactorily conclusive.. In my eyes, the only things I learned were as follow:

      1) There was food in ancient Egypt.
      2) They had rooms, presumably to hold 'stuff'.
      3) There was some form of medical surgery back in those days.

      An entire house of cards was built upon these easily observable but inconclusive bits of ancient history. Within the strict context of the evidence presented in this program, one could not possibly build anything more than plain old questions..

    9. Re:Two running themes on the night... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Very true. The Egyption priests got a lot of currency out of predicting the Nile flooding. They learned the phases of the moon and guarded that knowledge as it was their lifeblood.

    10. Re:Two running themes on the night... by mikerich · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While I agree with the majority of your comment, it still seems to me that it's a dubious proposition to say with certainty that the workers weren't slaves merely because they were treated well. To me, the word "slave" implies forced laborer. When you're talking about work that hard, it makes sense to keep you workers fit, slave or no. They were skilled workers, not easily replaceable. I simply find it hard to believe that if a pyramid worker tired of his profession, he would be allowed to leave and go on about his business. To me that's slavery. The same could be said about medieval feudalism.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    11. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      If they drank considerably more beer on a regular basis, they could tolerate a much higher level of alcohol in their blood.

      --
      What?
    12. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Maybe more of an indentured servant than a slave. A slave would be the property of his or her owner. So while they may have been forced labour, they probably weren't owned by anyone.

      --
      What?
    13. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Next point which really got to me was the fact that NO SLAVES were used and that it was a labor of love... That's such BULLSHIT.

      Perhaps they didn't show all the evidence?

      Perhaps, but their main argument was "The workers were well treated, therefore they couldn't have been slaves." This is a silly argument. In general, slaves have been, and have to be, well treated. In societies, like Egypt, Rome, middle-ages Europe, and even the southern US, that relied on slave labor, those slaves outnumbered the non-slaves, were valuable commodities, and-with the possible exception of the US-recognized as being human. It's as counterproductive to work your slave to death as it is to run your horse to death. Ever seen the careful treatment given to real working horses?

    14. Re:Two running themes on the night... by RottenDeadite · · Score: 1
      I do agree that it may seem like slavery to most Westerners. But I wonder, considering the Pharoahs were Gods in the eyes of the builders, if said builders might've considered it their holy duty to complete these pyramids for what we now consider "free of charge?"

      I just wonder how much one of these "slaves" would've objected to building the most important monument one could build for his Pharoah and his country? A chance to be a part of the construction of the single largest, most impressive visual image a person could experience at the time.

      Perhaps it was forced labor, but (perhaps out of ignroance) I'm wondering how forced it was.

      --

      ***JUMP PAD ACTIVATION INITIATION START***
      ***TRANSPORT WHEN READY***

    15. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Reziac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thanks for posting this, it saved me the trouble :)

      What people also forget is that "slaves" in the ancient world were not the yoked, whipped, starved, and generally mistreated image that modern folk have got from movies. It was more like an indentured job where you could count on food, clothing, shelter, and sometimes a small wage, oft as not with a target date when the slave had the option of buying himself free (most didn't -- where would they go that paid as well?) In those days, the average freeman was doing well to have work that paid in sufficient food and housing, never mind money; about all he had over the average slave was social status, and sometimes not even that.

      And there wasn't a big police force available to catch runaways -- so if you mistreated your slaves, they were liable to just up and leave and there was nothing the owner could do to stop them. I recall reading of an incident where some Roman landowner did so (mistreating slaves was a serious criminal offense under Roman law), and the entire slave workforce simply picked up their tools and left.

      In a talk back in 1983, C.J. Cherryh (who used to be a history teacher) pointed out that furthermore, slave labour (what moderns think of as slaves, that is) is inefficient for big projects like the pyramids, where you need a stable workforce who have some clue what they're doing. OTOH, for several months of the year (during the entire flood season), the Pharoah had a few million idle farmworkers with nothing better to do than drink beer and cause trouble -- the sensible thing to do was put them to work on big public projects where they got paid and stayed out of trouble. The bigger the project, the more idle farmers were kept busy, and the fewer social problems as a result. Pharoah wasn't stupid. :)

      C.J. also spoke of HOW the big stone blocks were moved. Nile River clay is so slick that when it's wet, you almost can't stand up on it. C.J. decided to try a little experiment with her 8th grade class. She didn't have stone blocks and Nile clay available, but did have wet grass and a two-ton metal construction weight. She harnessed her 8th graders to this two-ton block and -- well, the moment they got it moving, it damnear ran them over, it was that easy to move on mere wet grass. So the boys decided to ride on the block while 8 girls pulled. It still all but ran away with them, and in their haste to avoid being squished, they managed to drop it into a ditch. They'll never get it out of there, right?? Ha! The kids heaved on the ropes and it came flying up out of the ditch, over their heads and landed somewhere beyond 'em. Eeep!!

      C.J. concluded that with Nile clay to provide slipperyness, the major problem was not getting the massive stone blocks moving, nor hauling them up the ramps, but rather keeping them from running away under their own power!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been told that drunk egytian made little tunnels with small doors in pyramid.

    17. Re:Two running themes on the night... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      so can anyone explain to me how the egyptians managed to build these pyramids if they were constantly pissed??? i can barely walk after 8 pints never mind haul stone blocks...

      Ancient Egyptian beer isn't very much like modern beer. It was made from stale bread and sometimes dates and is very low in alcohol.

      There was a similar division in medieval Europe between weak beer and strong beer. Weak beer was the drink of choice during the day (again because water was so impure), whilst strong beer was for relaxation. And the quantities consumed in the Middle Ages were vast, six or seven pints of beer every day for men and women and a couple of pints for children!

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    18. Re:Two running themes on the night... by iabervon · · Score: 2

      If you consider that the Pharohs basically considered life preparation for the afterlife, building the tombs was for them about what building a military base is for us. It's extremely important that everything get done right, and the risk of sabotage is huge. You don't want anyone there who doesn't want to be there. You don't give security clearances to slaves.

    19. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please quote the books and resources that uphold your claims.

      as this goes against common knowlege that Egyptians used slaved heavily.

    20. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Dorms for 2000, but 23,000 had to sleep where? At home, where they usually slept. These were local farmers, working construction (and being paid to do so) during the flood season. Why would they need to sleep on site when they live just a couple miles away?? What part of "walk to work" do you not understand??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    21. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      Slaves? It's hard to say.

      Well as far as the good food and medical treatment, with the number of workers, even the slaves would have to be treated well so they would last, otherwise you wouldn't have a work force. -They'd all die.

      Slaves... that depends on what a slave is, and what they thought of themselves. Building pyramids was hard work, but it was probably a lot better work than some of the other things available in that day.

      Throughout history people died all the time. Not just cuz they were old, but because life sucked and that's what happened. It could be argued that pyramid builders could very well have had a higher standard of lifethan most people in the world at that time. Being paid in good food, beer and medical treatment may very well have been enough incentive in and of itself to build these things. After all What else was there to do back then?

      You have to remember even slaves would have needed to be well treated. These things could not have been built if the workforce kept dying off.

      1 block set every 2 minutes - for 30 years! EACH PYRAMID! Think about it!

    22. Re:Two running themes on the night... by ntr0py · · Score: 1

      That happened in Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.

    23. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >nor hauling them up the ramps, but rather keeping >them from running away under their own power!!

      Um... lack of friction does not negate the force of gravity. The nile clay would have helped in level distances, but lack of friction is a serious problem when you're going up a ramp :)

    24. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just take a moment out of my day to point out that no matter what the two of you think, you don't actually KNOW shit.

      You can guess, and educate yourself, and make more educated guesses, but until you can go back in time and check, noone knows squat, and noone can prove squat.

      Thank you!

    25. Re:Two running themes on the night... by smallfeet · · Score: 1

      >>> The kids heaved on the ropes and it came flying up out of the ditch, over their heads and landed somewhere beyond 'em. Eeep!!

      Right! I was buying the 2 ton block on the grass until it started flying over thier heads. Sounds like a bad SF story to me.

    26. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Well, I'll give you that C.J. may have exaggerated a bit, but having seen what can happen with momentum and low-friction surfaces, I'm sure it DID come up out of the ditch a tad bit more enthusastically than the kids expected.

      Consider that given momentum and an obstacle or lip to provide direction, a 40 ton railcar can wind up flipped over its fellows and 200 feet away from the tracks, and maybe it won't sound so unlikely.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    27. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      building the tombs was for them about what building a military base is for us

      pork?

      yes, overseers and priests and such were rewarded with wealth and power for building monuments to the king. But since it wasn't a democrasy, getting votes didn't really help. The workers weren't volunteers.

    28. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, it may seem like slavery to us enlightened westerners. But black slavery in America would have seemed like freedom to the ancient Egyptian slaves.

    29. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 miles is a hell of a daily commute on foot every day. So is 200. Hell, so is 5.

    30. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, the force required to hold an object on a ramp is equal to the sin of the angle mulitiplied by the mass of the object.

      If the average 8th grade girl could pull with a force of 150lbs (this is probably just a bit optimistic, particularly if they were standing in wet grass, half that would be more realistic), 8 girls could muster a force of somewhere in the neighborhood of 1200 pounds.

      Divide by the 4000 of the weight and take the inverse sin and find that on a friction-free surface, the girls could hold the block on a 17 degree angle. On any angle less than that the block would be accelerated. Taking into account the force required to overcome friction (I won't venture to guess the coefficent of wet grass), and its still quite believable.

    31. Re:Two running themes on the night... by Skoshi · · Score: 1

      At this site there is a great interview by NOVA with Mark Lehner - an Assistant Professor or Egyptian Archaeology at the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago. He's been working on the Giza Plateau Mapping Project with Dr. Hawass since 1984. He's got a lot of informative things to say about the pyramids and their construction.

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/explore/bui ld ers.html

      --
      "What are apples? Left, right, socialist...I don't know."
  57. Cheap by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I knew it, its all a cheap tv marketing scam. They put 2 doors there so they get to do another live show.

    Host: so, what is behind door number 2, is it?

    a) A Mummy
    b) My Mummy
    or c) The Mummy's Rachel Weisz!

    find out after the break!

    yes, thats right, The Mummy star Rachel Weisz has been planted into the chamber just so she can pop out, and they get to have some sort of celeb to boost ratings (they blew the back wall off in secret - its television, thats what they do. And yes, she is thin enough to fit down that passage :)

    Also planned is a little skit at the end to market coca-cola where a mummy chases them off the stage and accidently gets unwrapped to reveal a giant can... so exciting

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  58. The Egyptians Had It Right by wls · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Egyptians had it right... using the pyramids to secretly and safely store all their MP3 collections.

    1. Re:The Egyptians Had It Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they definitely didn't use open standards...

    2. Re:The Egyptians Had It Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why their civilization crumbled and they got taken over by the Arabs. Don't let it happen to your civilization.

    3. Re:The Egyptians Had It Right by fonetik · · Score: 1

      Isn't the robot a circumvention device under the DCMA then?

  59. It was live, but it was scripted by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    They had done several run-through tasks previous, like the drilling thing so they knew the step was there. So all they had to do was say "coming up: a step!"

  60. Silly/stupid question by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    Ground-penetrating radar?

    1. Re:Silly/stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they tried that and sonar but it didnt work

    2. Re:Silly/stupid question by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Ground Penetrating Radar tends to return a lot of false positives as it reflects back from the joints between the stones.

      (It was also used unsuccessfully in the Valley of the Kings to look for lost tombs. There, the various strata and joints in the rocks ruined the experiment.

      In the 1970s, cosmic rays were used to analyse the Pyramid of Khephren (the second pyramid at Giza). A detector was placed in the burial chamber which is located below the base of the pyramid, just offset from the centre.

      The experimenters found no evidence of voids in the body of the pyramid.

      I don't believe the experiment was repeated with any of the other pyramids.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  61. And in 200 years from now... by lucky_duck · · Score: 0

    They'll find Micheal Jackson buried behind his house in his liquid nitrogen tank...

  62. And behind the second door by goldcd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they find a priceless gold sarcophagus of unimaginable scientific value - how the f*ck do they intend to get it out?

    1. Re:And behind the second door by dreamquick · · Score: 2

      Hmmm... Since Hollywood execs are greedy and clearly have no grasp of history I'd suggest either some sort of explosive or a jack-hammer.

    2. Re:And behind the second door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take three steps back, then press k-k-k-comma?

    3. Re:And behind the second door by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Simple. They claim that Al Qaeda terrorists are hiding in the pyramid, bomb the fuck out of Egypt, and disassemble the pyramid block by block.

  63. Those Egyptians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Blast those Egyptians! They're always one step ahead!

  64. VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >A bit of history here...Rudolph Gantenbrink
    >and his team discovered the door some years
    >ago. Zahi responded by rushing them out of
    >the country and making sure that they
    >wouldn't be able to come back.

    This is actually a VERY misleading statement. Gantenbrink, by way of Robert Bauval, let the word out on the findings of the 'door', whereas it is standard procedure for *everyone* who is doing research there to go thru the Council of Antiquities FIRST.

    That Bauval was associated somehow with it is probably what tipped the balance (for fairness, you can read Bauval's account of the events in Secret Chamber by RB, chapter 9 I believe). The combination of having an "alternative" historian (that means one who cherry picks his 'evidences') together with the the breaking of the rules relating to announcement of discoveries is a big no no for egyptology, simply because these things get out of control, in terms of wild and completely unfounded speculation, REALLY quickly.

    Many might not realize this, but there is a huge *industry* revolving around the "mysteries" of ancient egypt, where authors who know very little of (or chose to ignore) the HUGE coherent picture that egyptology is, ignoring montains of evidence supporting it and countless others that go against their own "brilliant" speculation, end up transforming a culture into a "legacy", heavily hinting at mythical places such as Atlantis (a spurious story already of which ONLY plato talks about, and in terms heavily metaphorical), and often sliping into concepts like "noble or higher race" and the like.

    The world of "alternative egyptology" is fascinating at first glance, but is roten from the inside, trust me on this.

    Another point is that the "door" hardly is a door, as it is located in a shaft that is 8x8 inches, unless someone has a book to write about little beings using this shaft as a corridor for their daily affairs (I suspect this would easily be linked to our alledged martian legacy in a sleight of hand). The two "handles" could be many things, but even if they are handle, that doesn't make the thing a door, it just makes it a plug, with handles.

    The third thing i'd like to mention is the latent hatred of that "alternative research" community toward people like Zahi Hawass, who has, despite these people crave to dig everywhere, been dedicated to protecting and researching the Giza site for many decades. Granted Zahi has a big mouth, granted he doesn't know how to talk to journalists, but his dedication and honnesty are obvious to anybody who looks into the field (and no, reading Graham Hancock's 'work' does not qualify). Mark Lehner is in a somewhat similar yet different position, since as an ex-Cayce believer, he began his career with the goal of finding things like the "Hall of Records" (his academic training was financed by ARE, the Cayce fundation). Having learned a lot since his debuts, and having grown up, he is now bashed by his old buddies for being honnest. (don't you find it strange for instance that RB's "orion correlation theory" used to 'lock' giza to 10500BC, just as Cayce 'predicted' ? Thorough examination shows there is no such lock to such an epoch to be found, and the OCT has now been reduced to a "astetically pleasing representation" that lacks any form of precision, and hence any predictive power, rendering 10.5kBC completely and utterly arbitrary)

    The way I see it, "alternadoxy" is jumping to the gun on this, let's just wait and see what they find, if they indeed find anything, because whatever is or isn't there, it'll be one hell of a special.

    The alledged hijacking of Rudolf Gantenbrink's work is a straw man, Gantenbrink is refered to in all the papers you will find in academia relating to the exploration of the shafts. The nature of research dictates that one researcher follows another on a site, research is not for personal glory, it's about uncovering the truth. That Gantenbrink isn't always mentioned in the press is not the big deal that "alternadoxy" makes of it, after all, Dyxon isn't either and probed the shafts many decades before Gantenbrink (in his probings, he did find that the southern queen's chamber shaft seemed to be blocked at the height we know of today as the location of the plug). Also Gantenbrink has been associated with this special, if only in providing his experience to the i-robot team.

    As for "why so long?", well the pyramids aren't going anywhere, these things always take time, specifically because we do NOT want to rush in. I think the REAL question to ask is :

    Why NOW ?

    Well, think about it, it'll probably boost egyptian tourism by solving a mini-mystery. That tourism took a big blow after 9/11.

    Now THAT qualifies as very good reason to be doing this now rather than later.

    1. Re:VERY MISLEADING by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Why NOW ?

      Well, think about it, it'll probably boost egyptian tourism by solving a mini-mystery. That tourism took a big blow after 9/11.


      Very likely. I remember seeing a story about how representatives of Egypt were ramping up a big tourism campaign in this country, precisely because their tourist industry wound up on the rocks after 9/11. I also heard a story this morning about the new library in Alexandria, which they hope will give them a boost.

    2. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > The alledged hijacking of Rudolf Gantenbrink's work is a straw man, Gantenbrink is refered to in all the papers you will find in academia relating to the exploration of the shafts.

      I think the special actually referred to him by name five minutes into the program.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:VERY MISLEADING by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      Like someone mentioned earlier . . .
      Where's Geraldo when you need him? This would make a great episode! I can see the chairs flying now!

    4. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You damn kids get outta my pyramid or I'll put a curse on you!


      -- Pharoh

    5. Re:VERY MISLEADING by lemox · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is this some kind of archeology FUD-bot?

      Both this comment and its parent appear in the previous story ("Egyptian Pyramid Mysteries to be Explored Live") just take a look at the title of each page.

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

    6. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Snot+Locker · · Score: 1
      Granted Zahi has a big mouth, granted he doesn't know how to talk to journalists, but his dedication and honnesty are obvious to anybody who looks into the field (and no, reading Graham Hancock's 'work' does not qualify).

      Zahi lost some credibitlity with the general populous over his setup of the "discovery" of a "heretofore unknown" tomb on a Fox special a few years ago. It's hard to respect a scholar who knowingly lies to the public just for the sake of sensationalism.

      (And no, I'm no proponent of "alternadoxy" or the like, but I do appreciate researchers who demonstrate honesty and credibility in everything they do...)

    7. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Go back to your elementary school "ancient egypt is fun" books and leave the discussion to the grown ups, honey.

    8. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The general populous? Perhaps 'interested laymen.' would be a better term. Hardly any of the general populous in the US know who Zahi is, and many probably couldn't even find Egypt on a world map.

    9. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Peyna · · Score: 1
      probably couldn't even find Egypt on a world map.

      They could find it, but they wouldn't know it is in Africa.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, hardly any of the general populous know where Europe is, let alone where the fuck Egypt is PS. I can't spell.

    11. Re:VERY MISLEADING by KH · · Score: 1

      And the grandparent post appears here, too.

      Maybe all the three posts from the same AC?

    12. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sad but true

    13. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ?????

      I thought egypt was part of the mid-east

    14. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Peyna · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Middle-East is not a continent. Africa is a continent. Egypt is on the African continent.

      --
      What?
    15. Re:VERY MISLEADING by ethereal · · Score: 1

      There's something richly ironic about someone who admits their unfamiliarity with the basics of spelling, but complains that others are unfamiliar with the basics of geography. You, sir, must lead an interesting life.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    16. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Peyna · · Score: 1

      It is almost sad that this was modded "informative". Everyone should have already known that!

      --
      What?
    17. Re:VERY MISLEADING by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      interesting, and as someone who has a few hancock books and the like, i would be really interested in reading anything you might be able to recommend in relation to proper egyptology, as opposed to the 'alternative' type stuff that is definately the rage.

      while there are a heap of alternative titles on egyptology, for each alternative title, there are half a dozen 'mainstream' ones. its hard to know what is worth reading and what isnt.

    18. Re:VERY MISLEADING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make some interesting (though quite typical) points. First, yes there are rules set up by "the establishment" to "protect" us, but that doesn't mean that they are absolutely correct and neither are the "alternative crowd" absolutely incorrect. I've been interested in ancient history for a long time and read info from both sides regularly and believe it or not, the alternative crowd have some good points. There does seem to be a wee bit of strangeness going on in the world around 2500 BC. To say otherwise is to be intellectually dishonest. First of all, how was it even possible to build a Great Pyramid just shortly after the Stone Age? The exterior of the GP is a wonder, but the interior is an even greater wonder, considering the advanced logistics, planning and engineering involved. And those air shafts... 2 questions... WHY and HOW??? They couldn't have been "air shafts" because when the room was built it was open to the air and second, the shafts weren't even opened until the 1800s. Before then they were closed and smooth faced like the rest of the room with no indication of their existance. They had to be DESIGNED to be hidden long before the room was closed to sunlite. So, no, they could not have been communication devices or air shafts. And with that being so, why go through the TREMENDOUS engineering hassle of making these incredibly straight shafts that are plugged at both ends?

      That's just in Egypt. I became interested in the subject when looking at pyramids in the Americas. I thought it was curious that another culture would develop similar religious ambitions. I was REALLY intrigued when I found out there were also pyramids in Xian, China; the most in the world. I had never heard that China had the largest pyramids. I certainly never heard it from orthodox sources and this has been known for over 40 years.

      I say all that to say, suppressing alternative viewpoints is dangerous and myopic. No, I don't believe that the pyramids were built by aliens, but neither do the facts fully support orthodox archeological explanations. I say, keep an open mind.

      There was a person in recent years that contradicted orthodox medicaal thought by saying that ulcers were caused by an infection and not worry, spicy food etc. He was ridiculed for years and only recently was he vindicated so that now sufferers can finally be properly treated. From what I read in orthodox archeology they regularly have to radically rethink their assumptions because of a new bit of information. Is it this month's Scientific American that shows photos of ancient bird tracks that are millions of years before archeopterx? Ya know, maybe, just maybe some of what the "alternative crowd" is right.

  65. the camera? by syukton · · Score: 1

    I'm somewhat curious about the camera they used.

    Doctors have neat little arthoscopic cameras that would work much better in a situation like this. They use cameras that are _designed_ to squeeze into small places and go around corners and whatnot. It's high-tech. I didn't see that here. I saw, effectively, a stick with an immobile eye on it. My reception may have been a little off, so can somebody tell me if there was any looking around to be done?

    also, the hole required for an arthoscopic camera is something like 2mm, not 3/4 of an inch like the hole I believe was drilled.

    And wtf didn't they drill the second door for? You're telling me they can build a robot but they can't go to home depot for the long bits before hand? ;)

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:the camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why drill a hole when there was already a small piece of one of the corners missing. A little arthoscopic camera could have looked through there. Such a large hole, so much for preservation. The camera they used also couldn't be bent to look at any of the walls. Kinda amateurish.

      Did anybody else notice that they broke the copper bar on the right side of the door? In the original photos of the door and half of the ones from last night, the right bar is twice the length of the left bar.

      The guys who did the original tunnel exploration have a pretty detailed site complete with cad drawings and info on all the tunnels. Can't remember the url.

      One question still remaining is: Where does the lower northern shaft go? It takes a hard turn that the original robot couldn't follow.

  66. The writing on the wall... by Kredal · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike, and all blocked by really heavy stone doors.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:The writing on the wall... by unicron · · Score: 2

      The pungent smell of mildew eminates from the wet dungeon wa-"WHERE ARE THE CHEETOS?!"

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:The writing on the wall... by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      You can go (N)orth or (S)outh
      >Go North
      You cannot go that way. Your path is blocked by a really heavy stone doors
      >Use Drill
      You drill through the really heavy stone doors and peek through, only to find another stone door.
      >Use Drill
      You havent got any drill left.
      >Go South
      You cannot go that way. Your path is blocked by a really heavy stone doors
      >Shit

    3. Re:The writing on the wall... by svferris · · Score: 1

      Your torch goes out.

      It's dark...you're likely to be eaten by a grue.

  67. Figures.. by joshua404 · · Score: 3, Funny


    Now we'll have to wait a year for the sequel: Door: The Return.

    1. Re:Figures.. by gravelpup · · Score: 1
      Now we'll have to wait a year for the sequel: Door: The Return.

      Nope, we just have to wait until November 15. But until then, we can check out the new trailer!

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    2. Re:Figures.. by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Yeah, while they drill in from the other side and put something interesting there. MY GOD!! It's a tennis shoe... So then, the ancient Egyptians must have played tennis! Fascinating!

  68. Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by RebelTycoon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He opens the tomb, instantly concludes that it is a 4,500 year old bones.. Where's your evidence?

    The guy also said he wants to protect the pyramid, so they only drill a small whole in, rather then knock the door down. But with the coffin, they open it, breaking seals and everything.

    Zahi Hawass is a political historian... He believes that the "ancient" Eygptians were great, did it all themselves... Personally I await them discovering a German engineer who planned the thing, the aliens that helped lift blocks, and the Stargate eventually.

    Seriously, look at the modern Eygptians and their ancestors... Nothing has changed in 4,500... If anything their society has progressed backwards thanks to their religion... So please save this superior Eygptian culture bullshit...

    They couldn't have built them! Because they couldn't build them NOW (without Western technologies).

    Zahi Hawass! Shut the hell up!

    1. Re:Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current inhabitants of Egypt are probably not related to the original ones that created the pyramids. Egypt went through multiple times of being invaded by Arabs.

    2. Re:Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by dmnic · · Score: 1

      invaded by Arabs, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Ethiopians, Germans, Italians, French, etc.....
      is there even a truly native Egyptian anymore(ie, direct descendant from original Egypt))

    3. Re:Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by g8oz · · Score: 1
      Seriously, look at the modern Eygptians and their ancestors... Nothing has changed in 4,500... If anything their society has progressed backwards thanks to their religion... So please save this superior Eygptian culture bullshit...

      They couldn't have built them! Because they couldn't build them NOW (without Western technologies).

      What an ignorant thing to say. Now you will please shut up yourself.

    4. Re:Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder he's got a giant inferiority complex that he has to defend against. I mean, it's got to hurt being successfully invaded by the French.

    5. Re: Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > They couldn't have built them! Because they couldn't build them NOW (without Western technologies).

      How many pyramids have Westerners built?

      Or by "Western", did you perchance mean "Mayan"?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re: Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Um.. does the Luxor in Vegas count? (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    7. Re: Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      How many pyramids have Westerners built?

      Here they're called 'skyscrapers'.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    8. Re:Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's even worse than the time the Canadians burned down the White House.

    9. Re:Does Zahi Hawass listen to himself? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      I mean, it's got to hurt being successfully invaded by the French.

      Probably about as much as it was in England.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  69. The question on everyones minds... by Darkstar9969 · · Score: 1

    ...did they find Geraldo Rivera

    --
    MMMmmmmmm....erotic cakes!!! Homer J. Simpson - Treehouse of Horror VI
  70. egytian pyramids are great and all by f00zbll · · Score: 0, Troll
    but lets not forget there are other great pyramids, like the ones in central and south america. In many reguards, the American pyramids are equally amazing. The real difference here is there's more PR for egyptian pyramids, because they were found by "respected" british gentlemen.

    It is so damn irritating to hear so called "scientists" ooh and ahh over some discovery they made. And better yet when they say "see ancient egyptians weren't a bunch of slaves and they were smart." Big deal! If the scientist was so smart, he would have all the answers already. They only thing it really tells me is living scientists automatically assume ancient peoples are stupid or some how less intelligent. Get over your damn self and stop grandstanding. Geez. I don't consider PR gimics hardcore scientific research.

    / rant

  71. Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    On fox, I don't remember his name - but the reporter they had for the tomb/icing-on-the-cake "We will most likely find something one way or another so watch this" seemed like quite the prick. He kept interrupting Hawass - For a few minutes there, i wanted him to lift the cover on that sarcophagus, throw him in, and seal it back up. Then I figured that poor 4,500 year old dude in there would have to remain in eternity with some ignorant westerners white ass decomposing on top of him. Just didn't seem right. But there is a newfound room in the pyramid we could stuff him in. ;)

    1. Re:Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was the prick always out of breath when Hawass was doing all the work.

    2. Re:Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Just FYI, despite being dark-skinned and dark-haired, most north Africa residents (including *all* the Arab peoples) are Caucasian, NOT Negroid.

      Now, what was that about someone's ignorant white ass?? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      Okay. Perhaps you put my post into a context you shouldn't have and removed all of the jest I so subtly strung throughout said post.

      Without getting into political, social or genomic barriers here, perhaps I should have said "ignorant western ass."

    4. Re:Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by phriedom · · Score: 2

      "most north Africa residents (including *all* the Arab peoples) are Caucasian, NOT Negroid."

      That is true today, but were the Egyptians 4500 years ago Caucasian or Negroid?

      Frankly, I think the entire notion of race is subjective and given far too much importance, but that is another topic.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    5. Re:Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by Reziac · · Score: 2

      It was even more true 4500 years ago, from what I've read on the subject. Negroid peoples hadn't begun moving north, and were not found until somewhere in the south end of what's now the Sudan. There are Roman writings on the subject as well.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Zahi Hawass vs. Reporter in Tomb by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's a species thing. You should have used the term "ignorant jackass". ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  72. Second door by ShawnX · · Score: 1

    You know, what could be behind the second door? a dead wall. Perhaps the ancient Egyptians made a mistake when they made the shaft. Or, perhaps it was done on purpose due to the fact the "Queens chamber" was never used or was supposed to be a dummy. For all I know, this might be the oldest wild goose chase in the word =)

    --
    Everyone wants a Tux in their life.
    1. Re:Second door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else pay attention to the differences in the shafts appearance as the probe ascended?
      There appeared to be at least two sections, constructed with differing degrees of finish.
      From my viewpoint it looks like the builders may have built another pyramid on top of an original one, using it as a base.
      That would explain the so called "Queens" chamber.
      It's simply an earlier tomb, with its external "spirit" shafts blocked off by later renovation.
      This interpretation would also explain the below ground chamber as the first tomb located beneath the much smaller original pyramid.

  73. Who do you think's in there? by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 2

    Osama bin Laden? Jimmy Hoffa? Jim Morrison? Marilyn Monroe? Chandra Levy? Deep Throat? Elvis?

  74. If they keep going... by thogard · · Score: 2

    They are going to find the outside of the pyramid.

    I suspect that these shafts were so they could measure how far from the center the "queens" chamber was. They also may have had been useful for venting the CO from the lights they used.

    I suspect that the larger pyramids were built in such a way that there would always by a pyramid when the king kicked the bucket. This would me adding layers over the existing one. If you start with a small one, the lowerest chamber would have be under part of the oldest structure in the early days. Latter the "queens" chamber was would have been the mid point and later the "kings" chamber would have been center point as more layers were put on the outside. If you go with that theory and figure in the likely times of death of a king vs relative power of the king and his ability to build large projects there is a strong correlation.

    One theory that keeps showing up is the match to Orions belt of the tops of the pyramids. Why look for a hard solution when the SW corners all line up quite nicely. It would take some very careful analysis to determine if the they were used as
    exhaust vents and the current experiments may ruin any chances for that work.

    Many people make lots of assumptions about the pyramids from the three big ones at Giza. There are at least 90 others and many of them have many things in common but conflict with many of the new age concepts.

    1. Re:If they keep going... by mikerich · · Score: 3, Informative
      They are going to find the outside of the pyramid. I suspect that these shafts were so they could measure how far from the center the "queens" chamber was. They also may have had been useful for venting the CO from the lights they used.

      Why would they need to do that? The Queen's chamber is built high in the body of the pyramid. It wasn't carved into the pyramid later. The architects could always measure its corners with reference to the corners of the pyramid itself.

      I suspect that the larger pyramids were built in such a way that there would always by a pyramid when the king kicked the bucket. This would me adding layers over the existing one. If you start with a small one, the lowerest chamber would have be under part of the oldest structure in the early days. Latter the "queens" chamber was would have been the mid point and later the "kings" chamber would have been center point as more layers were put on the outside. If you go with that theory and figure in the likely times of death of a king vs relative power of the king and his ability to build large projects there is a strong correlation.

      Sorry that doesn't work either. The Great Pyramid is clearly atypical in having three chambers. Most pyramids seem to have had one or two at most.

      Almost all construction of the pyramid's interior would have been completed in the open air before succeeding layers were put into position. There is almost no decoration in any 3rd or 4th pyramids (a factor which has made their attribution very difficult).

      The 5th and 6th Dynasty pyramids are much more richly decorated with the so-called Pyramid Texts; a set of magic spells intended to whisk Pharaoh to the afterlife.

      Besides, the Great Pyramid is the only one with such shafts. Again it is fascinatingly atypical.

      The first step pyramids grow outwards from a central core. Layers of core stone are laid in tilting rows at 90 degrees to the facets of the steps. The casing was then applied around the outside of the rough inner core.

      However, the size of the pyramid was almost always determined in advance so as to allow the completion of the ancillary temples and service buildings which hunker up to the side of the pyramid. These are substantial constructions in their own right - the enclosure for the Step Pyramid is no less than 15 hectares of buildings and courtyards.

      Geometrically true pyramids did not grow in accretion layers. Their inner cores are almost always very roughly cut local stone laid in horizontal layers. Only the casings were laid with any precision. (By later times the core was built of mud brick or even rubble with the casing holding the whole lot together.

      Two pyramids come close to the method you are talking about. There is the first pyramid of all, the Step Pyramid of Zoser at Saqqara, which went through several phases of development, starting off as a flat bechlike structure known as a mastaba. This was gradually extended, then converted to a step pyramid and finally to the six step pyramid we see today. In each case the structure was more or less complete before the additions were made. It does seem that the Egyptians were really groping in the dark when they worked on Zoser's pyramid.

      The second, which is much more interesting is the Pyramid at Meidum. We believe this was started by the Pharaoh Huni of which we know very little indeed and rose originally as a seven step pyramid which was more or less completely cased. It is possible that Huni was buried in the pyramid, but at some later date, probably during the reign of Snofru, the pyramid was dramatically altered. The gaps between the steps were filled with relatively loose stones and a pyramidal casing placed around the structure. This collapsed in much later times leaving the pyramid as a complete ruin.

      We have several abandoned pyramids in various states of construction that show how they were designed. The most famous is the Blind Pyramid at Saqqara, ascribed to Sekhemkhet, successor to Zoser. The structure was never finished and never assumed a pyramidal form. It was used however, a sarcophagus, sealed, was found when the pyramid was excaveated. But it was empty... No one knows why the pyramid was raised or if it ever held more than one burial. Certainly other Pharaohs, Snofru and Amenemhet III had more than one.

      Likewise the smallest of the three great pyramids, that of Menkaure is clearly unfinished. The inner core was completed from local stone, and all of the casing stones were put into place - the top being Tura limestone (a lovely creamy white fine limestone from the East bank of the Nile), the lower stones being Aswan red granite. But the casing was not cut to its final shape, leaving the bottom very rough.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    2. Re:If they keep going... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Especially since per one astronomical item I saw, Orion's belt per se didn't exist at the time. It's become a recogniseable constellation somewhat more recently, due to the natural drift of stellar objects and the earth's polar alignment.

      I've seen a sky projection as the various stars and constellations would have looked in ancient times, and it's NOTHING like what we see now. And given a few thousand more years, Orion and his belt will be long gone as a visible feature.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:If they keep going... by thogard · · Score: 1

      However, the size of the pyramid was almost always determined in advance so as to allow the completion of the ancillary temples and service buildings which hunker up to the side of the pyramid.

      How do you know this? If you look an arial photo of Giza you will find that the two largest pyramids could be made much larger if you addmaterial to two of their sides. It just happens to be the two sides that don't line up with the others.

      This also seems to be the case at Dahshur with the red and bent pyramids. One of those has places where you can see several layers of internal stone and it appears to me that they stones were layered over an existing pyramid and not horizontally as shown in most books on the subject.

      The pyramids at Saqqara are the oldest and are in the transition stages from being a large mastaba. Their construction has as much in common with the latter pyramids as your house does with a stadium.

    4. Re:If they keep going... by mikerich · · Score: 1
      How do you know this? If you look an arial photo of Giza you will find that the two largest pyramids could be made much larger if you addmaterial to two of their sides. It just happens to be the two sides that don't line up with the others.

      You could always add material, but the Egyptians never did. The ground was leveled and incised for the first tier of blocks in advance of any construction.

      This also seems to be the case at Dahshur with the red and bent pyramids. One of those has places where you can see several layers of internal stone and it appears to me that they stones were layered over an existing pyramid and not horizontally as shown in most books on the subject.

      Partly right, and thanks for putting me right. The Bent Pyramid was the first attempt at a geometrically true pyramid and the workers used tilting layers for the lower courses. These may have helped contribute to the instability which caused the sudden change of angle further up. At this point the builders moved to horizontal layers of stone which became the norm for all subsequent pyramids.

      The Bent Pyramid is also the only major pyramid to retain almost all of its fine casing stones. Where this has been removed or collapsed you can see through the casing stones into the much more disorganised core.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  75. Behind the next door is.. by joshua404 · · Score: 1

    a vending machine.

    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.

  76. Two things: by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) You have got to learn that if you want to find out ANYTHING from a FOX special (or any FOX news broadcast) you don't watch it until the LAST 5 minutes. Honestly, I didn't even turn it on until the last 20 and I saw both the opening of the coffin and the camera going into the shaft.

    2) About the British-accent babe... ooooooh yeah. :-)

    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:Two things: by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Well, the Fox "Secrets of Magic revealed" specials were pretty decent. I was honestly surprised that they moved as fast as they did, I woulda thought they'd milk each "secret" for as long as possible, but it was short and to the point. Go Figure.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  77. Try harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Screw this "careful drilling" shit. Next time, send in a battlebot and knock the damned door down. While it's climbing up the shaft, stick a Fox executive under the "pulverizer" just to pass the time.

    1. Re:Try harder by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Maybe it would make for a good "Junkyard Wars" episode?

      "Today's challenge is to pulverize 2 stone doors inside an ancient Egyptian pyramid. As there will be annoying Egyptian officials whining from nearby, your machine should be loud, and preferably have an optional wood-chipper attachment. You have 10 hours from the sound of the Junkyard Wrecking Ball demolishing the Sphinx!"

      If they made a 2 hour special of THAT (say, with a couple of the bigger, beefier teams that prefer brute force competing), I'd watch :P

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  78. I can see that camera being used... by McFly69 · · Score: 1

    I can see that camera being used in other industries already! Think of how many industries could use it, expecially movie making! What it would be to have the deep view, of your favorite actress and see here having that "cleansing" sensation at the same time.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  79. No wheels?! by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

    That is simply amazing - You can calculate the position of the stars, Build a massive pyramid from the ground up with preplanned tunnels, Amputate arms, invent beer, yet nobody ever saw a log rolling a hill and thought "Gee, that could be useful!"

    1. Re:No wheels?! by Allaria · · Score: 1

      nobody ever saw a log rolling a hill...

      That's because they were in the middle of the desert, genius.

      (and yes, I know that there were probably trees around *somewhere*)

      --
      If a and b in c, and a can create b, and a can create a, and b can create b, and b cannot create a, then a created c.
    2. Re:No wheels?! by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      or a smooth rock rolling down the side of a pyramid, the same concept applies. And, yes they had trees, genius. Sycamore Fig,Myrrh,Persea,Tamarisk,Pomegranate Date Palm, Sunt-tree, etc...

    3. Re:No wheels?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. someone can't take a sarcastic joke

    4. Re:No wheels?! by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [grin] Tho I'm wondering -- was it that they didn't have wheels, or that they hadn't thought of axles, without which wheels tend to be somewhat useless.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:No wheels?! by Skoshi · · Score: 1

      Um...the Sumerians had beer before the ancient Egyptians.

      --
      "What are apples? Left, right, socialist...I don't know."
  80. Did anyone notice... by Raleel · · Score: 2

    Dr Hawass bash the lost civilization folks? Rather harshly too. It was almost...well...too harsh. Like he was being defensive or something. I don't know, maybe that's just his personality

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  81. In Between by Q-Branch · · Score: 2

    There are things known and things unknown and in between are The Doors.

    -- J. Morrison

  82. Grave Robbing in the 21st Century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more things change the more they stay the same.

  83. What's behind the door that Ito-san is next to? by gsfprez · · Score: 4, Funny

    (in all caps, stupid /. filter)
    Kuni : Naaaaatthing! Absolutely naaaaaaathing! stoooooooopad !!!! You're so stoooooopad!!!!!
    (/Weird Al UHF reference)

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    1. Re:What's behind the door that Ito-san is next to? by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      hillarious. :-D
      I was saying the same thing last night when the show was on. "You stooooopid!!!! So stoooopid!!! HA HA HA!!!!"

      --
      Karma: NaN
    2. Re:What's behind the door that Ito-san is next to? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2

      I feel so bad for anyone who actually *GETS* a reference to that terrible movie!

      (Still funny though)

    3. Re:What's behind the door that Ito-san is next to? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      that terrible movie!

      It has it's moments...who can forget "Conan the Librarian" or "Gandi 2 - No More Mr Nice Pacifist Resistance Leader"?

    4. Re:What's behind the door that Ito-san is next to? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      What's behind the next door?

      Suppries!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    5. Re:What's behind the door that Ito-san is next to? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      It has it's moments...who can forget "Conan the Librarian" or "Gandi 2 - No More Mr Nice Pacifist Resistance Leader"?

      Yeah that's true but "Raul's Kingdom" was probably the best of all... "Today we'll be teaching poodles how to fly!" Heh, too bad that actor guy died during the filming :(

      It's still a terrible example of a movie, funny though it may be!

  84. A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This entire thing was an exercise in what I would hesitate even to dignify as psuedo science. Egyptology is not science in the first place; not any more than astrology is. But this was even shy of real egyptology.

    The entire show consisted of outright lies and wild speculation presented as fact. For example, the statement that 'the people who lived here could not have been slaves because they were 50% male rather than a majority.' Huh? How does that make the slightest bit of sense? The Egyptians took slaves of any gender. I do not happen to think that most of the pyramid labor was slave, but that was hardly a supporting arguement.

    The director of anitquities made quite a show of concern for good science and taking proper care of the sites explored. But in the end, he essentially attacked that tomb with a chisel and a crowbar for no apparant reason. All he had to do was place a hydraulic jack under each corner and lift. But he damaged the sarcophagus to look like Indiana Jones and was shocked to find... a skeleton! Inside a grave- imagine! He pretended to read a 'curse' on the side of a tomb, despite the fact that he was tracing the characters in the wrong direction (across 2 seperate lines) and the fact that no inscription resembling a curse has ever been found on an Egyptian tomb. Ever. It was a myth invented before the Rosetta stone was found.

    It would have been nice if they had mentioned the fact that not a single set of human remains has ever been found in an Egyptian pyramid. The theory that these were built as literal tombs is yet unproven.

    Perhaps they might have incorporated the opinions of geologists, climatologists and other actual scientists in the course of this 'documentary.' But that surely would have ruffled the feathers of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, which apparantly exists for the purpose of justifying conclusions that were reached 100 years ago by untrained, British treasure seekers.

    I also took issue with the computerized recreations of the building of the pyramids. National Geographic completely ignored the fact that 4,000 years ago that area was a very temperate climate. No desert, no sand. A lush, green paradise that looked nothing like it does today. This fact was completely ignored throughout all the reenactments- even those that were clearly staged in the US with caucasian actors. Why go to all that trouble of staging a desert unless you really just don't know a damn thing about ancient Egypt?

    The truely embarrasing element of all this is that National Geographic was responsible. I expect better from them. This wasn't even pop science- just a big, fake exercise in tomb raiding and lies for the entertainment value. Cancel my membership, please.

    1. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Krieger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The program really was a travesty. It seemed entirely like a vehicle for Hawass to try and discredit the "Pyramidiots".

      As much as some of the pyramidiots are way out there. Many of them seem to raise some very legitimate and troubling questions about Egyptology. They in fact made me just interested enough to start reading academic texts about Egyptology and it does appear that some of the so called discoveries that have been found throughout the exploration of the pyramids have been fake. The "gang" graffiti of heiroglyphics that Hawass showed is in fact the only writing found in the pyramids. And it is possible that it was done by Egyptologist that got to that level to justify the expense of his expedition.

      I still find many of the current arguments about the construction of the pyramids to be unconvincing. At a minimum the timing still seems wrong. The other pyramids in the country seem to be proof. They have the step pyramids and then they have the pyramids at Dashour. The strange upsurge of amazingly well architected and built pyramids in the middle of a dynasty only to relapse into horrible pyramid building less then a few centuries later. And most of all without any evidence of civil unrest, war, or other catastrophe to explain the sudden loss of technology.

      So as much as the Pyramidiots are out there it would be interesting to see the Egyptologists take them seriously just long enough to convinvingly refute (or attempt to) their claims. It would certainly go a long way to discredit them. Because it seems that the Pyramidiots have managed to make some decent discoveries themselves, or at least ask questions that caused the exploration of the new ideas.

    2. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The strange upsurge of amazingly well architected and built pyramids in the middle of a dynasty only to relapse into horrible pyramid building less then a few centuries later. And most of all without any evidence of civil unrest, war, or other catastrophe to explain the sudden loss of technology.
      Same could be said of architecture within the past 60 years. Skyscrapers are not as popular (due to cost issues) once the technological feat has been accomplished.

      Also, Egypt during the later dynasty was dealing with foreign invaders which was not an issue during the Old Kingdom and as we all know war is expensive.

      Finally, while the quality of the pyramids declined in the new dynasty the building of cities such as Karnak took place which are marvels in themselves if you've ever been to Egypt.

      I could reference some stuff online to give other possible theories for the decline of pyramid building but it's a workday and I don't want to waste my time with an armchair Egytologist. And, yes, I have spent some time in Egypt.

    3. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I would have gotten away with it too...if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!

    4. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Reziac · · Score: 2

      The people living there (then and now) *were* Caucasians. Dark-skinned, but genetically Caucasion nonetheless.

      But you're right about the climate. At the time, indeed up thru the Roman era, North Africa and entire middle east were the pasture and breadbasket for the ancient world. This changed primarily due to wandering tribes and their goats.

      The grazing sequence (ie. who gets to use what they want first) for wandering tribes is richer to poorer: in terms of what livestock they have, that usually means first cattle, then sheep, then goats.

      Cattle graze only the top few inches of the grass, and generally don't eat shrubs. Sheep graze grass, shrubs, and everything else in reach down to the roots. Goats pull up the roots. The result is dramatically increased erosion, and when you lose topsoil and vegetation, you also lose humidity and experience a rise in temperature. This changes wind and airflow patterns so rainfall is reduced, and once the cycle starts it feeds on itself and gets progressively larger and more entrenched. Thus in a matter of a few human generations, a vast lush region can be transformed into an even vaster lifeless desert.

      That's exactly what happened to North Africa and the Middle East.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by lugonn · · Score: 2
      The "gang" graffiti of heiroglyphics that Hawass showed is in fact the only writing found in the pyramids.

      That is a misleading statement. Your statement should read, "The graffiti of heiroglyphics that Hawass showed is in fact the only ANCIENT writing STILL left in the pyramids."

      The great pyramids were full of hyheiroglyphs till the end of the 8th century, when they were all chipped away by catholic priests to remove "pagan" writings from the world. In fact, all priests in North Africa at the time, were required to make a pilgramige to Giza to help remove the "pagan" text.

      Also, there were large amounts of plaster debris inside the pyramids that was removed during restoration in the 20th century. This plaster is what was used to paint the heiroglyphs on. It provided a smooth surface to paint on. This plaster debris is ALL that is left of the heiroglyphs.

      And it is possible that it was done by Egyptologist that got to that level to justify the expense of his expedition.

      No. The chambers above the kings tomb with the graffiti in them, were first exavated by a British explorer looking for teasure in the 19th century. He was not there for science or justification for the exedition. He was there for loot. It even stated so on the show last night.

      Let me guess, you think that the Apollo missions were faked, and that the face on mars is a giant antenna.

    6. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Hi again (same A.C. all along, right? :) Yeah, it's amazing how people who want the pyramids to be alien artifacts can conveniently ignore how such projects (one could call them public works) are affected by the current economy and political climate, which then as now was subject to change. Another thing with war, your spare warm bodies are off fighting the Hittites instead of sitting around drinking beer, and it's kinda hard to build large projects without 'em. (Unless you've got some friendly aliens in your back yard ;)

      And who knows, maybe just as with skyscrapers and various other architectural forms thruout all of history, the next generation of pharoahs and engineers thought "It's been done. I want to build something else." Or perhaps "Geez, that thing is an architectural eyesore. I'm gonna build something more elegant."

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2
      I still find many of the current arguments about the construction of the pyramids to be unconvincing. At a minimum the timing still seems wrong. The other pyramids in the country seem to be proof. They have the step pyramids and then they have the pyramids at Dashour. The strange upsurge of amazingly well architected and built pyramids in the middle of a dynasty only to relapse into horrible pyramid building less then a few centuries later. And most of all without any evidence of civil unrest, war, or other catastrophe to explain the sudden loss of technology.

      First of all, the transition from mastaba to step pyramid to true pyramid is a logical and simple one. The only trick is figuring out how to distribute massive loads, and in fact, the "bent" pyramid at Dashur and the contemporaneous pyramid that collapsed from being built at an excessively steep angle while Dashur was being built remain as records of the trial-and-error of the Egyptian architects. Pyramids are not skyscrapers; they are among the simplest structures to build if you have enough grunt labor, something that Egypt, as the most populous country in the region, always had plenty of.

      Secondly, the general collapse at the end of the Old Kingdom was paralleled by collapses throughout the region, and is generally attributed to a prolonged drought. There has been some evidence in recent years that the drought may have been caused by a significant impact event on the Arabian peninsula. Moreover, there is considerable, well-documented evidence of widespread civil unrest and struggles for succession during the First Intermediate Period.

      Finally, Hawass is quite correct that the "gang graffiti" inside the topmost chamber above the so-called King's Chamber is the only writing inside a chamber of the pyramid, but similar markings have been found on many of the blocks which have fallen from or have been intentionally removed from the pyramids.

      Now mind you, I'm right there with you when it comes to questioning some of the conjectures of professional Egyptologists (as, for that matter, are many reputable dissenting Egyptologists -- which is the nature of scientific discourse, after all), but the "pyramidiots" as a class tend to be very poorly educated about modern Egyptology, apparently getting most of their information from cheap reprints of 19th century works. The most common misconception the pyramidiots promote is that Egyptian technology appeared full-fledged out of nothing, hinting at some earlier foreign (or even Atlantean) influences. Unfortunately, the truth is that the late Ice Age Nile was a much more volatile and intermittent river, frequently changing its course, and much early evidence has been scattered widely and buried deeply. However, in recent years, much interesting work has been done in uncovering older material, and that has gone a long way towards filling in the mysterious blank spaces in our understanding of ancient Egypt. Bear in mind that the one of the oldest, if not the oldest, burials of an anatomically modern human being was found in Egypt and dated to fifty thousand years before present. Egypt had a lot longer to develop than the sparse survival of fragile human artifacts would at first seem to suggest.

      Zahi Hawass is indeed a bit of an egomaniac, but he is also quite intelligent and sincere, and he has been known to change his mind from time to time. In contrast, John Anthony West, one of the more prominent pyramidiots, is still hawking his theory that the vaguely pi-shaped Egyptian door design was intended to represent 3.1415... despite the fact that neither the Greeks nor the Egyptians used the Greek letter pi to represent that ratio -- Leonhard Euler was the first to use that symbol in the 19th century.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    8. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Krieger · · Score: 2

      You're right. My statement was in fact poorly phrased.

      I'm curious where you get your information about the pyramids being full of heiroglyphs. In every book that I read about them (pyramidiot, academic, and otherwise), and even specials that I've seen on TV, every mention of the Pyramids of Giza (in particular) have said that nothing was found in them at all. Given that the main pyramid wasn't opened until much later then the others (due to tunneling)... I would be quite intrigued to read that.

      I think one of my largest gripes about Egyptology is that most academics get too hyper-focused on a particular theory and often seem to not reference other important details. But this too is a bad generalization.

      No I don't think the Apollo missions were faked, nor do I even think there is a face on Mars. I just believe in a healthy dose of skepticism, and it never helps when it takes voluminous reading of obscure books to learn what should be easily available. If many of the facts about the Pyramids were compiled in a better volume, it would make it simpler to actually have an educated conversation. Instead of having to ask obnoxious questions like the pyramidiots do, only to ultimately (typically after you make a fool of yourself) get information that reveals why the current dogma is the way it is.

    9. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by Krieger · · Score: 2

      Obviously much of my reading is out of date.

      The last several books that I've read rather specifically wondered at the whys of the decline of pyramid construction and yet to find a causal relationship with anything, even something so simple as a drought. Though they did speculate.

      I don't disagree with you about the pyramidiots at all. In fact I'd only ever read Bauval's book, which I was pleased to find disproved by Gantenbrink's site cheops.org. I think the only credible thing that I can give the pyramidiots is that perhaps civilization is significantly older then we think it is. I'm always amused when archaelogists dismiss the fact that civilization may be older, simply because we don't have extant objects from that time. It surprises me mostly because unless they decided to continue writing on stone, preservation of documents is unrealistic over that many years. Though I have noticed since I've started reading on it again in the last year or so that many discoveries appear to be forcing them to open their minds a little. I would be curious where you read about the discovery of the older material has been.

      I also suspect I did myself a disservice since the only Pyramidiots that I know of are Bauval, Hancock, and the woman that used kites to fly large blocks of stone in the Nevada desert. I guess I was just turned off by his grandstanding. I had a tendency to hit mute most of the times he started talking.

    10. Re:A Pathetic Excuse for Science by lugonn · · Score: 2
      I'm curious where you get your information about the pyramids being full of heiroglyphs.

      There was a series of PBS documetaries about ancient egypt that came out in the late 80's. They had shown some of the earliest pictures ever taken inside the giza pyramids. They were full of sand, debris, and plaster chippings. The sterile look the insides of the pyramids have now is a result of the clearing of debris and conservation efforts.

      In the same series, they blamed much of the destruction of ancient egyptian text on the fact that catholic priests destroyed much of the visible hyroglyphs between the 5th and 11th centuries, condemed as 'pagan symbols'. The narrirator of the show kept lamenting about how so much egyptian history/text was destroyed by the romans and the catholic church. Most existing hyroglyphs today are only in excavated monuments and a few temples that the egyptians managed to keep secret from the romans.

      There is also wide speculation that the Church killed many of the egyptian priests and artist that could read and write hyroglyphs at the same time they were supressing gnostics (2nd - 6th centuries). The Church also destroyed most Greek texts at the time that would have provided translations. That is why no one could read hyroglyphics until the Rosetta Stone was found in the 18th century; that had Hyroglyphic, Greek, and Coptic writing on it. You can thank a forward thinking egyptian priest for stashing that little gem in a temple wall.

  85. Www.cheops.org by gwizah · · Score: 2, Informative

    go here for an in-depth look at the work preformed by the man who really discovered the door.

    --

    There is no spork.
  86. They should... by MoonRider · · Score: 1

    ...see Indiana Jones more often !

  87. Robot v2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time, I am sure they could use a little more fire power. They are currently recruiting from the ranks of recently disenfranchised battle bot designers. A scaled down version of this seems to be in serious consideration.

  88. In A Manner Of Speaking... by Tsali · · Score: 1

    ... kind of like today.

    --
    This space for rent.
  89. Link For FOX's 18-35 Male Demographic by LittleGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    She's BBC News Commentator Laura Greene.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  90. We may have discovered.. by akruppa · · Score: 3, Funny

    the world's first advent calendar.
    Remember: don't open that last door before the 24th.

    Alex

    --
    Heisenberg may have been here
  91. Exactly my thought by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    I saw this was on last night and instantly thought -- "I bet it's another Geraldo's vault". Glad to see I didn't miss much...

    The fact that it was on Fox was another big tip...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  92. Actual Link For FOX's 18-35 Male Demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  93. laundry chute? by wiredog · · Score: 2

    No! It's the loo!

  94. The Egyptians understood recursion! by Whomever · · Score: 1

    This is proof that the Egyptians understood recursion. Clearly, they must have been influenced by alien visitors.

    --


    ----------
    perl -e 'print(pack("H*","646176652e7761676e657240676d6169 6c2e636f6d0a"));'
  95. Where was Bill Pullman? by SloppyElvis · · Score: 2

    Isn't he the king of live tomb excavating adventures? One bust, two busts, how many busts can we handle? Seriously, archealogy really isn't made for live TV. Save the hype for when something is *found*, not *expected*.

  96. You forgot by wiredog · · Score: 2

    6)A lady

    7)A tiger

  97. Re:Why open the over-seers coffin at the same time by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    "This show bugged me because they dole out hard information so sparingly."

    Watch TV much? Fox is the *master* of this technique! The whole point is to keep you excited so you see the commercials, period.

    "Why make us wait so long to see the CGI tour of the pyramids?"

    Do you really not get it? The advertisers believe that a significant number of people will buy a certain product (car?) after seeing it advertised on the show repeatedly. What bothers me is I think they're right.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  98. When was the last time... by scrod98 · · Score: 1

    That a great discovery was made in 120 minutes by planning exactly where to go? Aren't most discoveries made after some poor slob (and many poorer grad students/serfs alongside) spends 5 years digging in the sand?

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
  99. "Obviously" an airlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can't wait till they open the second door and catch an alien in the bath, woah the galatic consequences...

  100. Re: googling by hany · · Score: 1
    First, I found this Laura Greene, then I found this Laura Greene.

    It looks to me that Jupiter9 is interested to the second Laura. :)

    (Btw, that nationalgeographic.com page has black text on black background - looks like optimized for some "other" browser).

    --
    hany
  101. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its been 'proven' that the pyramids were standing before the egyptians were in the area. i dont remember which special show it was on :) so all this millions of slaves moving really big stones they carved into blocks and stacked them into a pyramid while still planning out amazing passages within while eating imaginary food while getting whipped is bs!

    the reason why egypt is so protective of the pyramids is because they like to be in history books as the tyrants who killed thousands of slaves to build a stupid rock house.

    it still is amazing there are no glyphs of how they built the rock stacks...

    1. Re:hmmm... by Queuetue · · Score: 2

      You may want to revisit your sources.

      a) I don't think anyone thinks the pyramids predated the egyptians (or at least people living in egypt). I've never even read about this hypothesis - ther than from "visiting martian" stories that I can't find any corroborative evidence of.

      b) Hardly anyone believes the pyramids were built by slaves anymore. All indications are that the pyramids were built as a team sport by what were essentially an zealous, overfed, understimulated, well-populated civilization that had all of thier resources magically delivered to them every spring.

      c) There are glyphs of how they built them. There are also glyphs left behind by the gangs, or teams that competed during construction. What is not documented is the specific "secret sauce" those teams used against one another. And why? Probably because it was a lot tougher to get an IP patent back then. Carving your secret into a wall is probably a bad way to conceal it.

    2. Re:hmmm... by NullProg · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are several Egyptologist who believe the Great Pyramid and the Sphinx date back 12000 years. This pre-dates the Egyptian culture by a few thousand years. The proof? Watermarks on the pyramid and sphinx.

      You can find a an article here:

      http://www.pyramidsarenotamystery.net/addendum6. ht ml

      There are several other references to this on the Web.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    3. Re:hmmm... by Queuetue · · Score: 2

      Did you actually read this? I got about 2.5 pages into his rambling, uneducated guesswork and when I realized he was trying to explain to me how the pyramids were *poured* into place with molds, based on the evidence that explorers found three junk fragments of rock and pottery in a pit.

      I'm done. I'd rather read about aliens zapping them in place with antigravity. At least that's interesting fiction. This guy DRONES on and on...

  102. Let's make a deal by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 1
    I guess this proves that ancient Egyptians started "Let's Make A Deal".

    I'll take what's behind door number 2!

    --

    Trying is the first step towards failure.

  103. Thanks for the spoiler by forged · · Score: 2

    The show was live in the US last night, but is only airing tonight on european NGC.

    Now I guess there won't be a lot of people watching the show.

    1. Re:Thanks for the spoiler by kindbud · · Score: 2

      And people say the US never does anything of value for the world...

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  104. Worst show I've seen in..... by sparkyman · · Score: 1

    A Long time.

    Why couldn't that guy look at the camera when he was talking?

    I'm quite dissappointed in National Geographic for allowing the whole, "let's keep'em guessing for a whole two hours" and all they find is another frickin' piece of rock. yippee!

    Sure wish i had those two hours back,
    mike

  105. Re:Why open the over-seers coffin at the same time by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > Because they strongly suspected piercing the door would be a disappointment?

    Because they could only sell enough ads for one special?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  106. Robot Doom by ktulus+cry · · Score: 1

    Eventually, that little robot is going to open a door, peek through - and go skittering down a shaft, camera rolling all the way, home viewers, scientists, and long dead pharoahs all alike laughing their asses off.

  107. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  108. Midgets anyone? by ressu · · Score: 1

    One thing that bothers me in all this, how did they make that tunnel if it was so small. it would have been pretty much impossible to make it while the stones were in place and even if the stones were not placed yet, it would have been difficult to get the holes aligned and when you come to think about the size of one stone itself, it would have still been hard to get through it.

    1. Re:Midgets anyone? by manon · · Score: 1

      I can understand the question. But keep in mind that the Egyptians had some very evolved knowledge in carving stuff (amongst other cool stuff). Like the big black vase they made with an interiour that is symmertical. Or sarcophagae made out of such hard materials that we now should have to use diamond drills to make it look that smooth.

      --
      42 + 1 = 42
    2. Re:Midgets anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should check out this site for a possible answer to your question.

    3. Re:Midgets anyone? by ressu · · Score: 1

      Quite true, i keep thinking with the knowledge we have now, but i should be thinking with about what they knew back then..
      There are always new innovative ways of doing things, and when ever a new thing is invented some of the old information is lost.

  109. Open a door to find another door... by Kakarat · · Score: 1
    Bug's Bunny has been doing this gag for years.

    --
    "I bet I'll get blamed for this." --Mayor Quimby
  110. I like MSNBC's current vote by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    What do you think of the robot's findings?

    - They're more significant than I expected.
    - They're a disappointment.
    - They're about what I expected.
    - None of the above.

    Hmm... I wonder who would vote for #1 there.
    And of course the poll sucks since it's missing vital choices:

    - Since CowboyNeal already got the loot, who cares?
    - I'm blind and deaf, you insensitive clod.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:I like MSNBC's current vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative Modding done because you read an MSNBC website instead of the ALmIGHtY Slashdot Linux rules MS Drools Website!

  111. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  112. except by vile7707 · · Score: 1

    This one reads: "Do not open til doomsday"

  113. Well, thank you for the spoilers! :P by jonr · · Score: 2

    Well, I'm actually glad that I didn't watch it. And how do they know that there is a secret chamber there? Did they use some sort of radar? My guess is that this is just a simple ventalation, looking at the angle and length of the tunnel.
    But we all know that the holy grail of archealogy is to find somthing ancient that changes the way we look at the world :)

  114. Re:Humor? by yomegaman · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure you can describe an 8"x8"x3" piece of rock as a "huge stone door"...

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  115. Re:Two running themes on the night... [OT] by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really understand the wave of "backseat experts" at Slashdot. People study things like the Egyptians their whole lives. It's widely accepted that slavery wasn't used to build the pyramids, it was social engineering on a massive scale. There was employment when the citizens had nothing else to do (during the Nile season of innundation.) Come to /. and read posts like this or the article a few days ago about comptuer voting systems with Michael saying.... "Welllll actually you are wrong, despite this being your area of expertise, if you make it open source it's guaranteed to be perfect." People have studied these things for years. Come here and write some a comment. If it get's modded +5, suddenly you become an expert.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  116. I was hoping for a trap by fence · · Score: 2
    --
    Interested in the Colorado Lottery or Powerball games?
    check out http://colotto.com
  117. Being Pharoah by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

    Actually, it leads to a chamber like in Being Jon Malkovich but they didn't know because they just send a robot in.

  118. Egyptian Easter Eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not so funny. Seeing how programmers today love sneaking in easter eggs into programs that no-one could possibly see, I wouldn't be surprised at all if this were true....

  119. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me know when they find a StarGate...

  120. Wow... bitchslapped! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thread was bitchslapped by the editors. Fucking homersexuals.

  121. Pyramid Undergoes Colonoscopy - on Live TV by tenzig_112 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Here are some notes from Giza's recent colonoscopy


    Physicians were shocked to discover that, due to its advanced age and weight, the monument belongs to the highest risk categories for a number of diseases.

    Through an interpreter, Giza told reporters that he decided to go ahead with the procedure in order to set an example for others. Wonders of the World, it seems, are notorious for taking terrible care ofthemselves. They never bathe, take no exercise, and avoid medical care at all costs. Stonehenge, for example, hasn't seen a Chiropractor in half a millennia.

    Originally bound for PBS or The Learning Channel, the project eventually landed on the network best known for routinely airing rectal contents: Fox Television.
  122. MOD PARENT UP by MoneyT · · Score: 1, Troll

    Funny stuff

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  123. Graverobbers from Outerspace! by Thud457 · · Score: 0
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  124. Metropolitan didn't get the good Egyptian stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of it is at the the Brooklyn Museum. One could say the Met's possession of Cleopatra's Needle (from Karnak) and Temple of Dendur ("gift" to US after hefty "donation" for Aswan Dam) are pretty impressive but most of the good pieces are over in Brooklyn.

  125. Whee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're gonna find the stargate

    *nods sagely*

    Hell

    According to some 'egyptologists', it's a good possibility. :p

  126. Anybody else notice by hoochiepapa · · Score: 1

    Outdoor scenes -- 'LIVE in the upper right-hand corner, switched from daylight to night?

    1. Re:Anybody else notice by JohnCub · · Score: 1

      Yeah, here I was thinking that if it is dark in america it wouldn't be dark in all of the rest of the world. I don't know, maybe my math is bad, but I assumed it would be breaking day there, not seemingly the same time zone as I'm in.

      It really made me consider what "LIVE" means to television stations.

      --
      -= Why can't I add 'Anonymous Coward' to my list of Foes? =-
    2. Re:Anybody else notice by dalabrat · · Score: 1

      The daylight scenes were background information. The portions of the show that were LIVE hade LIVE shown right on the screen. This is at least the 2nd or 3rd time that a show has covered the "Village of the Pyramid Builders" so they had quite a bit of background material. The only 2 parts that were LIVE were the "Queens" chamber and the Overseers Sarcophagus

  127. This was painful.. by unorthod0x · · Score: 1

    This turned out to be the most painful two hours spent in front of a television set in my recent memory..

    The whole show was hopelessly drawn out and built upon conjecture.. There were two particulars that irked me: An entire string of assumptions built on the unsupported conclusion of two extremely narrow rooms being used as living quarters. And an exclamation from the humble Dr. Hawass in regard to putting to rest the accusations of 'stupid idiots' who support the theory of an even more ancient civilization: Seemingly based solely only on the opening of a sarcophagus! "Look, I found bones, you are all stooopid morons, ha ha ha, I therefore conclude that my country is the greatest in the world and these pyramids were built out of love, not by slave labour - my ego explodes with delight!!!"

    Never again will I watch another program like this, having decided less than half way in that these were going to be two hours taken out of my life that I'll never get back I regretfully watched to the end as string after string of conjecture was assembled to create a fairy tale narrated by sweaty, ignorant and obscure personalities.. It was also made painfully evident that Zahi Hawass is an egotistical bufoon with butter fingers; did anyone else catch the totally uncalled for damaging to the top of the sarcophagus before he began to pry it open?

    Who are these shows aimed at, seriously? Saving the true discoveries for the last five minutes of the program seems insulting; wouldn't one at the very least be interested in speculation as to what these discoveries meant, therefore warranting at least fifteen minutes at the end of the show going through the possibilities? I must admit that I was personally insulted; it's not often that I put aside that much time for television in my busy day - of course I knew it was going to be fluffy - but I didn't count on getting burned that badly.

  128. Maybe by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Just Maybe.. its an airlock for space rats?

  129. Food for thought by Mazzaroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What were the utility of the two sealed copper handles we saw on the first door? The two copper handles were well centered on the door as viewed from within the shaft. They're clearly not for pulling since they were seen from under. Why a seals since there is another door behind? Maybe the copper handles and the seals were supposed to be seen from the other way around... leading to the Queen's chamber.

    The builders put a great deal of effort on these shafts. They were not added a posteriori, as an after thought. They were part of the original design. But, as far as I remember, no other (previous or later) pyramids present these features (correct me if I am wrong). So if these shafts were necessary for the Egyptian mythology, why are they only in Khufu? If they were not important for the mythology, why putting such an effort on their construction? Maybe there were "sects" within the egyptian mythology - and Khufu's builders were not following the mainstream beliefs. Consider that Khufu's is the only 'suspended' burial chamber discovered; all others were dug below the ground or placed at ground level, with the rest of the pyramid built above them.

    There are scientific evidences that there are more hidden chambers within the great pyramid. A team of japanese egyptologists conclude (in this report): For instance, the electromagnetic wave radar exploration system is capable of exploring the internal space and of detecting any foreign material within the stone structure by the abnormal reflections from inside the stonework using radar. Appling this method, fruitful results have so far been obtained, including some unusual radar reactions, which suggest the existence of some inner space at the locations as the north side of the Queen's Chamber within the pyramid, and the south side of the Great Pyramid and the north side of the Great Sphinx. I remember reading that the Japanese team estimated that over 3% of the pyramid is free space. A french team estimated the empty space being around 10%. I am trying to locate the references of these numbers - if you have hints... Anyway, this is a lot more that what we currently discovered.

    for now... :-)

  130. Hee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was funny.

  131. I learned 5 new things last night... by elbowdonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First of all, having Tivo last night was like a fluffy dream come true. As the distance between "real" content decreased with each commercial break, I became more and more thankful for the commercial skipping features. All told, my viewing of the real content probably only trailed live users by a handful of minutes.

    According to Zahi, I learned a few new things:

    1. Not a single slave helped build the pyramids.

    2. Using a crowbar to chip into a 4000 year old sarcophogas is just fine, rather than using more delicate means (did you see the huge chunk of the lid flake off as he got a little too excited?).

    3. Zahi thinks the rest of the world with theories opposed to his "kind and loving egyptians built the pyramids" are idiots because of a thumbprint on the sarcophogas lid. (!?)

    4. Zahi's bone specialist confirms: no slaves here, we have 50% men and 50% women in our findings (as if slavery was something only men had to endure).

    5. Robots aren't as snazzy as portrayed in the movies. Most movie robots would have been at least able to MacGuyver their way through the second door.

    1. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by JohnG · · Score: 2

      The reason they don't think there were any slaves is because there were enough cow bones found in the cooking area to feed thousands of men comfortably for the entire construction period of the pyramid. Also one of the workers was found to have recieved and survived a medical amputation, 4500 years ago. Slaves don't get fed like kings and recieve (what was then) first class medical procedures.

    2. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have 50% men and 50% women in our findings I believe most of the slaves were usually men, makes sense to me.

    3. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by ianscot · · Score: 2
      > Slaves don't get fed like kings and recieve > (what was then) first class medical procedures.

      Ever looked into slavery in the Roman period? I'm not claiming to be an expert on this subject, but there are lots of forms of slavery, and not all of them match up with the expectations you seem to have.

      Even within any given slave society, there are huge differences in treatment. William Clark's body slave York was a high class personal servant and companion during the Lewis and Clark expedition, but when he fell out of favor with Clark later (apparently for wanting to be with his wife who'd been moved away) he eventually got hired out for rent as a disciplinary measure -- a particularly brutal experience. He was well fed, and got very good care at first, and then later he didn't.

      There's nothing at all unimaginable about well-fed, well-cared-for artisan slaves working on a pyramid.

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    4. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by JohnG · · Score: 2

      All I'm doing is repeating what the people who've spent their lives studying the egyptians said. I don't know anything about slavery in the Roman period, but I assumed it was better to trust an egyptologist(?) over a poster on Slashdot regarding the subject.

    5. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by ianscot · · Score: 2
      Okay, I'm not attributing the view to you, don't take offense. It's a specious argument either way, is all.

      The idea that slaves were always malnourished grunt labor is a weird oversimplification at best. Rome is just a particularly good example, because some of the higher officials in Rome could be slaves. The ancient world had all sorts of kinds of slavery -- just as one guy, York, could have radically different experiences under American slavery.

      As far as the fallacy of arguing from authority goes, you shouldn't trust Fox to choose experts any more than you trust Slashdot to screen postings. Take a look at that Moon-landings-were-a-fraud "special" they put on the air. Maybe you want to think about motives, too: Fox would put a stupid Moon fraud special on the air because they've got the whole right-wing "Government is evil" thing going on. The guy last night was pretty clearly motivated by a sort of Egyptian archeological boosterism, wasn't he? Ever heard brochures read aloud quite so well? Near as I can tell, I'm not personally dying to confirm the Exodus, or shilling for slavery or anything...

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    6. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by MadBurner · · Score: 0

      without adaquate food your body can't produce enough energy for a hard days work. it's pure and simple, starve them, get less work, and have to keep replacing people or feed them well and give them some medical and they'll work for years. gee. how much do you like retraining employees.

    7. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by JohnG · · Score: 2

      I did think it was strange that the guy though a fingerprint was enough to prove that space aliens (or whomever else besides egyptians) didn't have anything to do with it. Not saying that space aliens did have anything to do with it, just that a fingerprint only means that a human was in egypt at the time a human was buried. (We don't even know for sure it was an egyptian human, based on a fingerprint). And yeah, the moon thing was a bit hokey.

    8. Re:I learned 5 new things last night... by elbowdonkey · · Score: 1

      I believe most of the slaves were usually men, makes sense to me.

      Read some of the Old Testament and you'll learn that entire races, man, woman, and child were slaves. In modern time, American's enslaved man, woman, and child.

      The more I think of it, the more I come to the conclusion that there's never been a "males only" slave society.

      Perhaps the men did the heavy lifting, but certainly there were other tasks for women and children to perform.

  132. What about the hook? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if the "grappling hook" they found could have been attached to the "handles" of the "door" originally. Attach a rope to it and they may have been planning to pull the "door" out after putting the mummy in. If it broke loose from the door, I don't think they would have been able to do anything about it except cover the hole up and pretend it never happened.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  133. How to get through the doors by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Send a hedgehog barreling through the tunnel.

  134. Let's Make a Nile by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Another door?

    Okay.

    Fine.

    I'll say it.

    *sigh*

    What's behind door number 2, Johnny?

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  135. Life emulates art by NortWind · · Score: 1

    Just like a scene from the movie "What's Up, Tigerlily?" by Woody Allen. "Oh no, another door!"

  136. Elf needs food.. BADLY! by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could send in a hobbi to listen at the door.. or prod it with a ten foot pole? tone

    --
    tone
  137. Uninspiring Video by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I rarely find video featuring small shafts entertaining.

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  138. What does the NGS think it's doing ??? by ianscot · · Score: 2
    For the National Geographic Society to be slumming with Fox on something like this is really just so danged depressing. C'mon, Fox?? The people who brought you the completely bogus, disingenuous "news" special about the moon landings as a hoax?!? The people who aired that special again even after the storm of laughter from every credible source? You really want to be in bed with these people?

    The NGS TV division has sold its soul to the popular media. It started sometime around that 1980s polar bear special where they coated a cage in seal oil and then put someone inside for the polar bear to ferociously "attack." They're hardly above the level of on-the-cheap Discovery Channel documentaries any more; heck, they're basically doing a re-run of the Geraldo Rivera vault thing, as everyone here seems to recognize.

    If Nova had run a special on this same topic, I'd have been making time to see it. Fox's version just makes me wince. Their "news" is uninformed advocacy, even when they don't have a "Sensational Mystery" to uncover. Ack. For science, Nova's the standard. For nature, Nature is easily the best show on. The American Experience is amazingly good for history or biography. NGS doesn't rate any more, they're just cranking out empty filler like this. Too sad.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  139. I'll take door #2 Monty by EvlOvrLrd · · Score: 1

    My money is on that the body of Jimmy Hoffa lays beyond that second door.

    --


    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear to be bright. Until you hear them speak.
  140. Actually, they opened the second door... by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Actually, they opened the second door in the filming of another special already.

    Here is an image of the items removed from behind the second door: new Cheops artifacts

    -- Terry

  141. Same old stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't even watch this year. Last time I watched them opening an "unexplored" area on live TV I think I was the only person in the world who noticed there were already friggin lights in there when they opened the door so the cameras could see. Then they walk in & he just HAPPENS to dig in the right spot to dig up old pottery (and the dirt seemed a different color like it was dumped on top of the pottery). They're nothing but rating boosters & money makers. bah.

  142. dear god that was lame by cruelworld · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I want my two hours back.

  143. proof of time travel by shren · · Score: 4, Funny
    Somebody has been using the speed of light distorting effects of pairs of copper wire to travel back in time and set up a room in a pyramid so they can make a very long series of TV documentaries.

    Hey. I'll give you a big pile of gold if you'll make a room that's impossible to get into in this pyramid. Say, up a narrow shaft, behind a couple doors. And throw in a trap that will crush a small robot.

    Robot?

    It's like a cat, but not holy.

    Oh. Ok. Sure. Why not?

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  144. Who cares about politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's stop discussing nonsense and go see what's behind that DOOR!!

  145. Re:Why open the over-seers coffin at the same time by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    The breatheless prattle is part of the side show, entertainment, to stretch 10 minutes out to a half hour including ads.

    A decade or so ago some treasure hunter raised a ship safe from a wreck. He managed to ruin an entire case of silver certificates, various documents and other compostables by bringing them to room temperature for a few weeks so as to open them for the cameras. Too bad. They would have been worth more if he had taken care of the artifacts rather than the publicity.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  146. Due to lack of funding.. by MongooseCN · · Score: 4, Funny

    Due to lack of funding, and the need to get through the second door, the next robot is going to be a LEGO cart with TNT strapped to it.

  147. Just like Rama by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    The egyptians always do things by three...

  148. Re:Humor? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

    Who knows what the ancients hid there. A plague, an unknown dangerous entity, horrendously dangerous alien tools or what? I think you've seen The Keep late at night a few too many times.

  149. Markings & Getting through the second door by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

    Inside the small chamber behind the first door I thought I saw a streak running parallel to the shaft on the right side of the chamber. To the right of it, behind the "Fox" logo, I saw something that may have also been some sort of marking. Can anyone say for sure if these were more markings left by the builders?

    Also, now that they can't use the machine they used to find the depth of the first door to find the depth of the second door, since it can't push up against the second door with 40 lbs of force, and their drill bit is probably too short to drill through the second door, anyone have any theories on how they might get through that door? (If it is a door at all)

    1. Re:Markings & Getting through the second door by foo12 · · Score: 1

      wouldn't a longer drill bit in a stabilizing sheath suffice?

  150. Advertising... by TFloore · · Score: 2

    Do you really not get it? The advertisers believe that a significant number of people will buy a certain product (car?) after seeing it advertised on the show repeatedly. What bothers me is I think they're right.

    They don't necessarily believe there will be a direct link like that. What most advertisers think is that, when you go to buy a product, you'll be more comfortable buying something you've heard of before. If you go to a store, and see a row of effectively-identical cleaners, you'll buy the one whose name sounds familiar.

    It's mostly just a way of "helping" people make a meaningless decision.

    If I'm going to buy product type X, I'll look at the choices, eliminate those brands I've had bad experiences with, and make what amounts to a random choice among the rest, assuming research into them says they are effectively identical. If I've heard advertising recently concerning one of the remaining selections, that vague "I've heard of that one before" may tilt me towards selecting it. And most consumer goods, up to and including cars, are effectively identical inside a product category.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
  151. interesting read on the Cheops pyramid by technaesthetic · · Score: 1

    those interested in a very entertaining if not scientifically compelling read on the "true meaning" of the pyramid should check out _The Giza Power Plant_ by Christopher Dunn. He maintains that the pyramid harnessed energy from the earth using harmonic resonance. Yes, sounds quintessential crackpot, but his research is meticulous. On top of that, this latest discovery falls in line with his theory.

    -J
    (Insert profound saying here)

  152. Kilroy was there, too.... by Mr_Bethesda · · Score: 1

    Actually, we will once and for-all find the earliest source of the Kilroy hieroglyph so famous from the Second World War!

    Kilroy was here! And there! And there, too!

  153. I agree that slaves were not the only workers by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    But I have still never heard of a compelling scheme of how to move the stones into position. Asuming they were big blocks of rock.

    Anyway, many of the later pyramids dissolved into what looks like huge mounds of mud. This makes me think that maybe there may be another explenation-- And then I cam across this. Maybe, just maybe, they were not carved blocks of stone, but rather something like concrete.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:I agree that slaves were not the only workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the rocks are still there if you want to find. In fact, you can even go look at them, and with the approval of the Egyptian government, scientifically examine them. Many others have. You could just read what they wrote. Or you could read what a few crackpots who believe the were built by space aliens to harness magic energies wrote.

    2. Re:I agree that slaves were not the only workers by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      The argument that the article I posted indicates is that the Egyptians ground up the limestone and used it to make a primitive concrete. The only magic energy used here is called technology. And I think that mixing concrete is probably less of a feet than movint the large blocks to the top of the pyramid if they were solid limestone AND making them fit s

      Why is it that people think that the pyramid builders were stupid or technologically unsphisticated? The Romans had concrete, so it was not a technology dependent on something that the Egyptians lacked.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  154. Re:Two running themes on the night... [OT] by john82 · · Score: 1

    One might call that the other "Slashdot Effect". Although there are subject matter experts who participate, they are routinely drowned in the clamoring of "conventional wisdom" (Slashdot-style). The other recurring themes include: all businesses are bad, and one political party (take your pick) is incredibly evil.

  155. Was the door green? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now, National Geographic presents... "Mysteries of the Pyramids II - Behind the Green Door"... starring Marylin Chambers as "The Mummy"...

  156. Digging the Weans by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who still believes that every ancient artifact or construction must have been of great religious significance, or due to aliens, or whatever mysterious force, needs to read "Digging the Weans" by Robert Nathan. It's a parody on the archeological mythologies that have developed from the natural human tendency to believe that anything remote in time or distance is automagically beyond human understanding. "Here be dragons."

    As to this 8"x8" shaft with two doors... my guess is that it was either an air shaft or a communication shaft (much akin to the speaking tubes used on board large ships, before the advent of modern electronics). Which is just common sense architecture in a project that large. Why go way the hell outside to communicate with your supervisor when you can just shout up the handy tube?? Not to mention that it's kinda hard to work if everyone has breathed all the oxygen out of the air supply already.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Digging the Weans by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Then why doors?

      I can see one plug, but not the three (at least) that this shaft has.

    2. Re:Digging the Weans by Reziac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd guess because the entire shaft wasn't built at once, and plugs (doors, whatever) were placed on an as-needed basis, depending on where the associated layer of construction stopped.

      And the plugs could be simply to keep out rats once the project was finalized.

      Something else to remember -- the Egyptians were damned good engineers, but until relatively recent times (mid-1900s or thereabouts) stress force math wasn't sufficiently understood. That's why so many ancient and medieval structures are still standing -- they were construction overkill (ie. built a lot stronger and heavier than was actually required for the building to hold up to everyday use). Also sometimes an engineer died and no one had any clue how he meant to finish something, so it gets truncated and then you have doors to nowhere.

      Good example of construction overkill: Paris Gibson Jr. High School in Great Falls, MT. The old part of the building, from ca. 1920, is built to "ancient" standards -- it looks like this wall needs to be thick, so it IS thick. WAY thicker and stronger than necessary. The new part of the building (ca. 1950) was built more in line with modern construction -- sufficient to the project. Along comes the big Yellowstone earthquake.. the 1920s section was undamaged; the 1950s section wound up condemned. (You can see it being blown to bits in the opening sequence of the film "Telethon".)

      Stuctural overkill is why we have still pyramids to argue about today. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Digging the Weans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      YES, I'm a Christian. Got a problem with that?

      Not if you have no problem with me being an atheist.

    4. Re:Digging the Weans by bjtuna · · Score: 1, Troll

      Which is just common sense architecture

      That would be engineering, not architecture. Architects design the shape and look of a structure; engineers (specifically, civil and structural engineers) decide how to build them.

      Until you know what IS and ISN'T architecture, you should probably refrain from making authoritative claims on what constitutes common sense in that field.

    5. Re:Digging the Weans by Reziac · · Score: 2

      My sister is an architect, married to another one who is the son of one, and there are also structural engineers in that family. It's a disease. :)

      Seriously, I didn't bother to differentiate, because .. well, it didn't seem worth the nitpick. This is slashdot, not some professional journal. And besides, the dividing line isn't that perfectly delineated. If it were, my sister wouldn't have had to take so damned many engineering classes.

      I'd guess it was even less delineated in ancient times, when project management wasn't such a sprawling spiderweb as it is today.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Digging the Weans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be so quick to assume that the fact that these structures are still standing is a result of structural overkill. There is a lot of good evidence that these engineers were extremely intelligent -- especially the ones involved in the Great Pyramid.

    7. Re:Digging the Weans by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      Your sister has eight legs? Freaky!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:Digging the Weans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a problem with you being AC and saying that, fag.

    9. Re:Digging the Weans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what it is about pyramids, they just seem damn stable. And they have geometrically fewer points than, say, a cube or 3d rectangle (what's the proper term for that?). Bonus!

    10. Re:Digging the Weans by Cubeman · · Score: 1

      Rectangular prism

  157. Skeleton people have jobs in entertainment by djiin · · Score: 1

    Yup, Ally McBeal is descended from this illustrious and ancient race!!

    Possibly ginger spice is also, but she is more likely just from another planet.

    1. Re:Skeleton people have jobs in entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ginger spice? Skeletal?!?!?!?

      Do you even have EYES? (She is the fleshiest of all the spice girls, you must know that, right?)

  158. The door was not 8x8, look at the footage! by hacker · · Score: 2
    Did you even see the show? The "door" is in an 8"x8" square shaft that entends up at about a 45 degree angle. I think the shaft was 200 ft long.

    Did you even look at the video footage? The 8x8 shaft had a "plug" in the end of it, which was 3" thick. They drilled through that plug, inserted an endoscope with a light, and found a _room_ with a door at the end of it, much larger than the 8x8 hole which led up to it. The room appeared to be blank, with only the door at the other end. It was most-certainly not an 8x8 "door" that they found. The hole they drilled is equivalent to drilling a hole in a shoebox from the outside, and looking inside it from that hole.

    1. Re:The door was not 8x8, look at the footage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw the show, and it looked to me like your so-called "room" was not a room at all, but a continuation of the shaft, with another plug a few inches/feet further up.

  159. Great... by krugg234 · · Score: 1

    ...now we get to watch another 2 hour special where they discover that the other door leads to a janitorial closet.

    1. Re:Great... by MadBurner · · Score: 0

      NO DOUBT. ken and Barbi do egypt I suspect that whole fiasco of being a set. i think that was the worste National Geo Special i've ever seen.

  160. What the shafts in Egyptian pyramids are for by mirnav · · Score: 1, Informative
    I remember a book in which a quite plausible theory was proposed for the raison d'etre of the shafts in Egyptian pyramids - to lead the soul of the deceased king out towards a specific destination in the skies.

    The book first juxtaposes our view of the sky with the map of Egypt, positioning the Milky Way over the river Nile. Interesting to see is that the three great pyramids coincide with the three stars in the "belt" in the Orion - remember how the two pyramids are aligned but the third is slightly off? Well, so are the stars in Orion's Belt. Another interesting point is that how so many of the pyramids (you know there are MANY of them) coincide with the stars on the map.

    So it seems that the Egyptians positioned the pyramids to represent stars in the night sky.

    Now the shafts - If we look at a cross-section of the pyramids at the shafts, they originate at the pharoah's chamber and go out towards the sky. The book goes on to show the studies that suggest that at the time when those pyramids and hence the shafts were constructed, the Orion constellation was at that angle.

    If this theory is correct, than it seems the shafts in the pyramids are meant to give way to the soul of the deceased towards the Orion constellation.

    The book was titled "The Orion Mystery" and the author is Robert Bauval. Neither this book nor I intend to make any alien connection. Maybe the Egyptians liked the Orion constellation for no good reason. Maybe the shafts in the Great Pyramids point towards the Orion Constellation (whose Belt they represent) and the other shafts in the other pyramids (if they exist) point towards the respective stars they represented in the night sky. In any case, it is the best theory I heard so far regarding the shafts and the reason they were built into the pyramids.

    1. Re:What the shafts in Egyptian pyramids are for by Skoshi · · Score: 1

      I read the book too (and highly recommend it). There are other ties between ancient Egypt and the stars (no, not the Futurama episode where Bender becomes pharaoh). They have a legend about the constellation we call Orion. They considered it to be Osiris. Ancient Egyptian legends talk of how once a pharaoh (or a queen or certain other high level advisors, family members, etc.) died, they were represented by a star in the heavens.

      --
      "What are apples? Left, right, socialist...I don't know."
  161. Another door? by hike2 · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who didn't think that there was another door behind the first "door". To me it seemed like that was the end of that. And why didn't they mount those small cameras that you can easily rotate and move so you can see more than just straight ... maybe there are some artifacts in that otherwise empty looking small chamber ... Last night I had the impression that a whole bunch of people that died some 4000 years ago (presumably) were laughing their asses off in some afterlife.

    --
    Fourty-two!
  162. Riiiiing. Riiiiiing. by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

    Click. "Abdul's machine shop. How may I help you?" "Hey Abby how's it going? Hey listen, remember that big-ass boring tool I bought from you? Um, it wasn't the longest one you have, right?"

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  163. Another Rod Brooks project by Animats · · Score: 2
    iRobot, which made the teleoperator used, is a Rod Brooks operation. Did he appear on TV? I'd be surprised if he didn't get some TV exposure; he's into that.

    Next time, they'll need a heavy-duty robot company, like RedZone Robotics, Red Whittaker's spinoff from the CMU Field Robotics Center. They've built robots to work on damaged nuclear reactors and to do asbestos removal, and some of their their robots have cut through walls.

    (It's a bit sad to look at the CMU Field Robotics Center website today. They're mostly doing NASA work, which is the kiss of death for a robotics project. Very little of what NASA does in robotics ever gets used, let alone flies on a mission. None of it gets built in quantity. The output of a NASA project is usually just a press release.)

  164. hmmmm, sounds like a students diet by dr_db · · Score: 1

    Meat would have been rarer than in the modern diet, but there would have plenty of vegetarian foods, beer and bread to keep people going.

  165. Re:Why open the over-seers coffin at the same time by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    Well, that would explain that Bowflex thing I have in my den. Not sure when I ordered it or what it does but....oh wait, TV is on now......

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  166. Pyramids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're on to something, the pyramids in China and central and south america may be older and are just as impressive. I like the ones from the new world better than the old world myself.

  167. There is a door to the east by Sonicboom · · Score: 4, Funny

    > East

    You open this door, and there is a long passageway to another door. A NASTY DWARF THROWS AN AXE AT YOU!

    > OPEN DOOR

    You open the door, and there is a black sceptre and a bird cage on the floor. "XYZZY" is written on the door.

    > XYZZY

    You are in a well house.....

    --
    [Connection closed by foreign host]
  168. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Teknogeek · · Score: 1

    "There was nothing in Al Capone's Vault,
    But it wasn't Geraldo's fault...D'OH!"

    --
    I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
  169. behind that door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they find the remains of jimmy hoffa, Rasterman, and the you can call me ray guy

  170. What I thought was going to happen... by MDL · · Score: 1

    Male Host: We are about to open the sarcophagus for the first time...yes!!! here we go!! Zahi: Argh!!! I...almost...there!!! ooooooo!!! it's dark!!!! Male Host: YES!! YES!!! Zahi: BONES!!! WE HAVE A SKELETON!!! Male Host: We have just uncovered..(Zahi starts crawling inside the sarcophagus)....errrrr we just have.... Zahi: (Inside the sarcophagus) I shall now be sealed with my ancestors!!.....help me foreigner!!! (starts pulling cover closed) Male Host: Errrr...(whispers: fade out!! fade out!!!) Camera fades.... Credits

  171. $500,000 robot? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    That little robot cost half a million bucks?

    What we need here is a minature tunnel boring machine .

    Other respondents here have suggested digging through to the hidden chamber from outside. With a minature tunnel boring machine Archeologist could bore through to the mystery chamber without marring the appearance of the pyramids outside or any of the passages.

    What? That would cost a mint! Well maybe, but afterwards it could be used to lay cable under the streets of congested city centers. We discussed the pneumatic tubes being recycled into internet conduit a little while ago.

    1. Re:$500,000 robot? by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Sure enough, they make minature tunnel boring machines. That is what they need to get through this passage, and search for all the other hidden voids the Japanese study found.

      The one pictured here is pictured here bores a hole one foot in diameter. Who would have thought there was a whole website devoted to selling used tunnel boring machines ? They list one that bores six inch holes, that costs only $155,000 USD.

    2. Re:$500,000 robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the index of the Cumbria (county in England) Yellow Pages I noticed the following amusing entry:
      "Boring : See 'Civil Engineers'."

  172. Re:Humor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    show me the evidence for your statements.

    idiot

  173. A solution to the mystery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nice sized wrecking ball should do the trick.

  174. it's obvious what it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a fart ventilation tunnel

  175. There's nothing in the box! Stupid...! by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    Thought this was appropriate...the Wheel of Fish scene from the movie UHF.

    KUNI: Okay, let's play the game! We start with yesterday's winner... Mrs. Phyllis Weaver. Are you ready, Weaver?

    PHYLLIS: I sure am, Kuni!

    KUNI: Okay, then you get over here and spin the Wheel of Fish! Go ahead, give it a big spin...

    The audience cheers as Phyllis runs onto the stage and gives the wheel a big spin. Kuni and Phyllis ad lib various encouragements to the wheel ("come on, baby!", "do it for mama!", "fishy fishy fishy..."). The wheel comes to a stop pointing to a swordfish.

    KUNI: A swordfish! Mm, very tasty! Okay, Weaver, now listen carefully...You can hold on to your swordfish, or you can go for what's in the box that Hiro-san is bringing down the aisle right now! What's it gonna be?

    Our blonde presenter has taken the swordfish off the wheel and is holding it out in front of Phyllis. Kuni's assistant comes down the aisle holding a large box on a tray. The studio audience calls out to Phyllis ("Keep the fish!"... "Take the box!"). Phyllis looks back and forth between the fish and the box.

    PHYLLIS: I... I'll take the box!

    KUNI: Okay, Weaver, you took the box! Let's see what's in it...

    Hiro-san lifts up the box and there's absolutely nothing underneath it. KUNI (continuing, smiling broadly) Nothing! There's nothing in the box! Stupid...! You're so stupid...!!

    The audience joins in with shouts of "Stupid!"

  176. Motel of the Mysteries by cyberwench · · Score: 2

    Another good archaeology parody book to check out is "Motel of the Mysteries" by David Macaulay. It's a good read, about an amateur archaeologist (Howard Carson) who falls into a shaft while exploring the ancient country of Usa in 4022. His discoveries at the "Toot-n-C'mon" motel are classic. =)

    --
    ~ Leilah
    1. Re:Motel of the Mysteries by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the link, sounds like fun!! But we already know that this Carson fellow's research is bogus, or he would have known that the Usans preferred to be called Weans :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  177. something strange about the "door" they drilled... by Holgrave · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice anything odd about the "door" they drilled through? Maybe it was my imagination, but I swear on the one they drilled through it looked like the handles were both the same size. Yet I've always noticed whenever a picture of the door is shown that the handle on the right is significantly longer than the one one the left. Doesn't that seem a bit fishy?

  178. HAHAHA by bogie · · Score: 3, Funny

    You perves are slashdotting NationalGeographic.

    I was just there to get directions on how to get away from there.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  179. Dr. Zahi Hawass is a Blathering Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only person who thinks that Dr. Zahi Hawass comes off as a egotistical moron, sticking his face in front of a camera at every opportunity and constantly saying the most pointless, baseless, and irrelevant things?

    "These are the fingerprints of the workmen who built the pyramids!" No they're not, ya blithering idiot. "Blabble bobble dipsy doodle ka-bibble wah wah wah!" Yeah, sure Dr. Hawass, whatever. Can you just go away and let us examine the damned rock now?

  180. It was a Red Snapper... by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2

    ...not a "swordfish".

    I watched the movie a couple of nights ago on DvD. Highly recommended.

  181. My theory by Salsaman · · Score: 2
    I'm not claiming to be an expert by any means, but having seen the program, here's my theory.

    The Queen's chamber is some way below the King's chamber and was obviously constructed first since the pyramid was built from top to bottom (duh). At one point in the program they mentioned how building spaces higher up in pyramids was a fairly recent accomplishment. Prior to that, spaces higher up were impossible, due to the weight of stone outside such chambers collapsing them.

    My theory is that the so called Queen's chamber was a fallback (if you'll excuse the pun), in case the higher, King's chamber, were to collapse during construction. Above the King's chamber are several other spaces which are believed to be load bearing gaps to prevent the pyramid falling in on the King's chamber. It seems likely to me that the engineers could not have been 100% sure that the King's chamber would be structurally sound.

    I'm making a guess that that is why the Queen's chamber has these shafts; if the King's chamber had collapsed, then these shafts would have been connected to the outside, however, once it became obvious that the King's chamber was sound, work on the Queen's chamber stopped.

  182. s/top to bottom/bottom to top by Salsaman · · Score: 1

    Oooops...

  183. Thats why I use TIVO by himey · · Score: 1

    Skipped right to the end, and saw... oooh.. the other door. Yippie.

  184. it's a water pump by g4dget · · Score: 2

    Come on, you know it's a steam powered pyramid water pump :-)

  185. Wouldnt it be funny... by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    ...If this rover thingymajigbob piled through loads of doors and three miles of corridors, only to end up at a 10ftx12ft chamber full of spare doors. We'd at least know that those ancients knew how to take the pish.

  186. It took me back by gjbivin · · Score: 1

    All the way through the show, I kept thinking of the "Mystery of Al Capone's Vault" special that basically destroyed Geraldo Rivera's career as a serious newscaster. Two hours of similar hype as they dug into the basement wall to find ... two old booze bottles.

  187. Alright, I admit... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    ...that I didn't watch the special, but considering most of the comments here about how the two hours were "wasted time" (plus I have seen similar Hawiss "specials" that were just as wasteful) - I am glad I didn't. With that out of the way...

    What is this talk of fingerprint(s) on the sarcophagus? Was this a marking, or an impression? One comment seems to indicate that the print was an impression or something - so what was the sarcophagus made from? Clay? Were such things made from clay? I had always thought they were carved from stone?

    But if the sarcophagus was stone, why the print? What if it was a concrete substance, rather than "stone"? You could certainly make a print in that...

    There is a theory that the Egyptians had the technology and resources (ie, sand, limestone, something from the Red Sea) to make concrete, and the theory would explain how some of the pyramids (esp the Great Pyramid) and temple structures could have been built, even though they are so large - they were simply "poured" into place. At least, that's the theory...

    I am trying to figure out why all the doors on the tunnel - what theory fits this, what the tunnel may have been for (I have seen a site that claims the Great Pyramid was a giant water pump - but that doesn't make much sense since it was built when the area had plenty of water and was fertile), those handles on the doors (why?), among other things...

    Finally, I do have to wonder about that robot - that is a TON of money for what should be a relatively simple robot - I can understand that the sides of the tunnel were smooth, and at an angle (ie, needs more than a standard robot wheel drive), but quarter of a mil? Right - time to find the person who pocketed the dough...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Alright, I admit... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      What is this talk of fingerprint(s) on the sarcophagus? Was this a marking, or an impression? One comment seems to indicate that the print was an impression or something - so what was the sarcophagus made from? Clay? Were such things made from clay? I had always thought they were carved from stone?

      The lid of the sarcophagus was a flat stone(?) slab. It was sealed to the rim of the sarcophagus with mud, or clay or mortar of some kind. It was friable enough that, at one point, Hawiss was poking at the sealant with a chisel, that he was holding like an ice-pick.

      The handprint was in the sealant, not the stone.

    2. Re:Alright, I admit... by Skoshi · · Score: 1

      As far as the stone vs. clay goes, I know that as far as homes and tombs were concerned most Egyptians relied on a form of mud bricks because stone was too valuable. Sarcophagi were also made of wood and metal. So, it stands to reason that the same may be true for sarcophagi. The handprint could have been formed not by the person who sealed the coffin, but rather the person who formed the lid.

      --
      "What are apples? Left, right, socialist...I don't know."
  188. It's like a game show by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    .... and the next logical question is....

    "What is behind DOOR NUMBER TWO?!?!?"

    Okay, that was bad, but it needed said.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  189. All of the Conflicting Truths" killed it for me by Razzious · · Score: 2

    I admit I was skeptical going into watching this. However once it started I immediatly had to begin with some scoffing. First off as has been said MANY TIMES, the "Live" TV was sickning at best.

    However it got worse. First they went through explaining that the "Pully and Wheel" had not been invented yet. However The specifically show a CGI series where a LARGE DOOR was closed using none other than a series of PULLIES!

    They said that Any Likeness, Statue, etc. was believed to House their spirit after death. Yet they presume these small ducts & Tunnels were used to allow their spirit its release into the afterlife.

    Back to the Pully & Wheel problem, I am almost 100% certain that in the past they have uncovered Hyrogliphics that showed the stones being "rolled" by placing round logs at the front and "pulling it" over them replacing the front "Wheel" with the rear one as it was passed.

    To Slave or Not To Slave!

    Once again almost POSITIVE that many Hyrogliphics have been uncovered showing the guards beating the slaves. Also Slavery is always looked upon now as an EVIL! Many times in past people CHOSE to become a "Bond Servant" dedicating their life to serving another person with that person promising to provide and care for the servant.

    Now the Blathering Idiot Dr. Zahi...The dude looked like he Jizzed on himself after seeing what? ANOTHER Blackage!

    --
    Razzious Domini
    I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
  190. The definitive answer: Here's what they'll find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    When they knock down the second door they will find the names of the builders in heiroglyphics.

    The shaft, my friends, is the world's oldest easter egg.

  191. Whatever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They way they were hyping that show, I wouldn't have been satisfied with anything less than a bunch of mummies doing the monster mash.

  192. Am I the only one who has seen this show before??? by gumbysworld · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who has seen this show before???
    The whole show was like a flash back and I know I have seen it before. What is going on??? Some sort of time warp around my room???

    I know that I know that I know that I already seen this show and knew the ending. 2 or 3 years ago it was on TV. It was a re-edited re-run.

  193. My Rescue-Rooter guy could do a better job by K-Man · · Score: 2

    Apparently these days, the average roto-rooter truck carries a video camera snake that can go 100+ feet down a pipe and peek at whatever's down there.

    --
    ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    1. Re:My Rescue-Rooter guy could do a better job by Turing+Machine · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. When the sewer got stopped up at my old apartment building, they used their "Sewer Cam" to find out what was wrong.

  194. Lost Vault by networkmonkey · · Score: 1

    I think I saw Heraldo do this when he was looking for Al Capones lost vault.

  195. Pathetic robot by pla · · Score: 2

    Robots aren't as snazzy as portrayed in the movies.

    I really have a hard time believing that thing cost $250k (or rather, that anyone would have *paid* $250k for it).

    First of all, I have, quite seriously, built smaller robots out of *Legos* that could have managed that climb. And they wouldn't have needed a ramp to get over a 2" curb. Hell, I suspect most remote control cars could probably have managed it, with some slight mods.

    Second, why did it carry its "brain", as they called it, directly behind it? It had to drag a video and power cable behind it anyway! Even assuming it needed any internal intelligence (for traction, perhaps?), since they basically piloted it by remote control, all the CPU power could have stayed at the *other* end of the wire.

    And third, can someone explain to me why drilling a hole in a stone could have *any* chance of compromising the "safety" of the pyramid? At worst they would have cracked a very small stone block. Considering that earlier "archaeologists" used *DYNAMITE* in their work, one small cracked stone would certainly not have brought the entire pyramid crashing down.


    Zahi thinks the rest of the world with theories opposed to his "kind and loving egyptians built the pyramids" are idiots because of a thumbprint on the sarcophogas lid

    No kidding, eh? Did anyone else get the impression that Hawass only hates those with "alternative" theories on the pyramids in favor of his own *equally* out-there ideas? Built with love? Gimme a break! Even if the workers didn't count as slaves (which didn't mean the same thing back then as it does to us now), they certainly saw such construction as nothing more than a sweet government job, something to do during the flood season when they couldn't grow anything.

    I also loved the obvious bias against Gantenbrink. The show actually claimed that only their "new" robot managed to get past the "step" in the tunnel! And, while using a ramp might have made an *excellent* solution from the point of view of simplicity, Gantenbrink solved it with a better robot. Hell, they even claimed that *Hawass* "found" the outlet of the upper tunnels, of which the Northern outlet had never gone missing, and *Gantenbrink* discovered the outlet to the Southern tunnel in his 1992 survey.

    Biased, "overcooked", Factually incorrect, "bad" archaology little better than what they accuse their forerunners of, and a somewhat dissapointing "climax". Overall, the show sucked. They could have condensed the entire "interesting" part of the show into 15 minutes (and in fact, they did... the *last* 15 minutes).

  196. Re:Gentoo and UTournament! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid FUCKTARD!!!!!

    Keep posts ON-TOPIC or GO LICK YOUR OWN BUNGHOLE!!!

    How does it feel to be one of the few LIVING ABORTIONS?

  197. Laura Green? by jabber · · Score: 2

    They couldn't find anyone named Lara Croft, I take it?

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  198. Look, droopy black titties! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some things never change!

  199. Re:Am I the only one who has seen this show before by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    You saw a previous show in the same 'series' with the same archeologist and same host. They also opened a sarcopogus on the previous show and showed video from the (lower-tech) robot that originally scoped out the shaft. That mostly involved a different site.

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  200. preview should be my friend... by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    ...they also spelled "sarcophagus" correctly...

    oops...

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  201. The shaft is locked, the lights are on... by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    ...it's Robot Fightin' Time!

    National Geo and FOX can pick up Battlebots and save a SHITLoad of dosh on the price of robots!

    And maybe they can cut Carmen Electra into small pieces and shove her into the shaft once they find the fifth door and give up. ;)

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  202. Video now online by darrad · · Score: 1

    MSNBC has a video clip of the other side of the door, whichever door you prefer....

    Here is the link

  203. Another bogus moment by geoswan · · Score: 2
    ... The director of anitquities made quite a show of concern for good science and taking proper care of the sites explored. But in the end, he essentially attacked that tomb with a chisel and a crowbar for no apparant reason.

    To fill time they showed a clip, filmed earlier, of Hawiss checking up on an image in one of the earlier pyramids. This one had a warren of underground passages beneath it. It had been closed for decades because it was dangerous. Hawiss kept saying how dangerous it was -- because of the possibility of falling rock...

    Okay buddy, they why aren't you wearing a hard hat?

    Yes, it was interesting to look around. But it would have been more interesting with less of the Gee-whiz and phony human interest BS.

  204. Its a powerplant by Hassman · · Score: 1

    Man, they got it all wrong. It's not a tomb. It's a powerplant.

    http://www.gizapower.com

    Seriously. The shit makes sense. It's all just too perfect to be a tomb.

    Mark

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  205. And behind that door... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

    Won't those guys be surprised when they open the next door and discover 100,000 tons of sand pouring out of the hole... :)

  206. The first door wasn't a door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a rock wall that was thin enough to drill through. The second door isn't a door either. It's a rock wall too. But we don't know how thick it is.

  207. Thank you... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    That makes sense...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  208. What was it for? by fatkid4ever · · Score: 1

    I dunno for sure, but I think it's where they kept their weed....

  209. Time for a D3 Map, Methinks... by ewhac · · Score: 2

    It's clear what the small shafts are for. You launch a guided missile down them, then steer them into the MatCen switch, shutting off construction of more virus-infected drones.

    Sorry, I just finished Descent 3, and suddenly find myself wanting to fly a Pyro-GL through the Great Pyramid's shaftwork.

    Schwab

  210. Re:Two running themes on the night... [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you are so right. I am glad we have an expert like you to clear it up for us and dispel the centuries of belief and general knowledge of the whole world, with a fact supported by no evidence that only you and a very few of your chosen Albigensian underlings have been able to widely accept.

  211. Would you like to have door number two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is obvious what is behind door number two...

    The contents of Al Capone's Vault...

  212. Why not look up and around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look up, look around, use a mirror. This is not a big problem, but yet we saw nothing of the "handles", WHY NOT? Send it back in with a mirror pointing up, retract it and send it back in at another angle, rinse, repete.

    1 Year, $250K and these guys didn't use a flexable camera like they use to spy under doors all the time in "drug" busts?

    How about this one, we know there has been some digging ABOVE this "door" lately, they broke through, plundered all the cool stuff they found and crammed a big stone in front of the "door" so you have to spend the next 20 years trying to see into a room that has been picked clean.

    It's 50 feet from the outside, why not remove the stones from the outside and see what is there, if nothing, put them all back.

  213. Re:Humor? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    show me the evidence for your statements

    This is the last comment I expected to be questioned on! It's not like I'm proposing any sort of revolutionary new idea of egyptian burial customs; it's common knowledge among those with any knowledge at all that burials were seen as transitions for the journey to the afterlife. They'd even entomb some with boats, to help them on their journey. Some mummified their cats.

    If you must have evidence, try this yahoo news story.

    Or, just try this google search.

    And stop asking people for sources on obvious subjects. It just makes you look stupid.

  214. You're in a maze, twisty passages lead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God, Zork built in stone!

  215. Re:something strange about the "door" they drilled by markb · · Score: 1

    Yes, I did notice this. I'm suprised nobody else did. In one part of the show, there's a prerecorded bit with the robot approaching the "door" with it's sonar attachment. The right "handle" is long. They then cut to something else, and then back to the video of the robot inching closer to the door (still with the sonar attachment) and the "handle" is short.

    Theory: The robot broke the "handle" while applying pressure to the "door" with the sonar attachment.

    From the previous expedition, the other "handle" appears to once have been longer, but also broke off at one point. The broken off piece is visible in one of the pictures here.

    It's too bad they did not explain what happened. I prefer TV that doesn't insult my intelligence.