Slashdot Mirror


Buffy the Vampire Slayer is Officially Over

tstoneman writes "Say it ain't so! Yahoo has an article says how SMG herself confirmed the rumors of the series demise. Even though it is clearly in its twilight, it's still one of the vest best shows on TV. It however points to the fact that a spin-off will emerge, hopefully one that is more successful than Angel."

659 comments

  1. slayed! by snillfisk · · Score: 0, Funny

    So, the slayer got slayed?

    --
    mats
    One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
  2. first post by Whitecloud · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps a more '2000' reality based vampire show is in order, where the vampires vote each other off the show :)

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

    1. Re:first post by Soko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps a more '2000' reality based vampire show is in order, where the vampires vote each other off the show :)

      Nah. That show would suck.

      *OW!!!!*

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new spin-off: Kennedy the lesbian vampire slayer?

    3. Re:first post by Jawnst · · Score: 0

      that sux0rz.

      --
      Richard P. Johnson CEO, Johnson Tool Company
    4. Re:first post by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      >> Perhaps a more '2000' reality based vampire show is in order, where the vampires vote each other off the show :)

      Unfortently, there would be many ugly vampires that you wouldn't want to see in a tight cape. And there would be some really anoying one, like stuck up, or arrogant. Though the backstabbing could take on a whole new perspective.

    5. Re:first post by skaffen42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's terrible! I'd never stake my Karma and/or reputation on a lame pun like that!

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    6. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      that would suck and blow at the same time...hard to picture but feasible...

    7. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To borrow a phrase from the FARK crowd:

      I'd hit it.

    8. Re:first post by parliboy · · Score: 1

      Depends on what's at stake.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    9. Re:first post by mpe · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a more '2000' reality based vampire show is in order, where the vampires vote each other off the show :)

      Shouldn't that read "stake each other off the show"...

    10. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a more '2000' reality based vampire show is in order, where the vampires vote each other off the show :)

      Or bomb their neighbour because he looks like he might do something.

    11. Re:first post by rapier99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No seriously, an idea like that would never see the light of day.

    12. Re:first post by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1

      Oh, quit vamping for karma....

    13. Re:first post by IdleTime · · Score: 0

      Not more than the original show.

      I hope that they will let the terrible stupid and horribly acted show rest forever. I hope we never, ever see any re-runs of Buffy. It is one of the worst shows ever on TV. How anyone can even be remotly interested in such crap is beyond my comprehension.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    14. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is already in Syndication. Has been for two years on FX and others.....

      Have you watched it?

    15. Re:first post by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would not be a grave decision.

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    16. Re:first post by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      It'll never see the light of day.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    17. Re:first post by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      It is already in Syndication. Has been for two years on FX and others.....
      Have you watched it?

      My guess is not.. If (s)he thinks that the show sucks so bad then chances are that he hasn't seen more than part of one episode. My sister used to have the same reaction to Dr. Who. from walking by while I was watching it. Then she watched a few episodes....
      Then she watched a lot more.

      I didn't even think to watch buffy until about a year ago, when I was asked to help tape back episodes for a friend (Space Channel in Canada plays 5 episodes a week). After watching it for a few episodes, I realized that it was both hilarious and deep (A combination I'd never expected to find).

      The last time I was this enthusiastic about a show was Babylon 5.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  3. Finally... by BTWR · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now the public can have what it has been craving for YEARS... a sequel to the original movie :-)

    (btw, I AM just joking)

    1. Re:Finally... by vanillacoke · · Score: 1

      the best part about BTVS was it was sooo bad it was good. It was campy. With a sequal its going to not have the essence that the first one had!

      --
      The secret to getting modded up is to allways say i've got karma to burn in your sig..
    2. Re:Finally... by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree with the sooo bad part... the rest I'm not so sure about.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
  4. I agree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is one of the VEST!

  5. Buffy who? by methangel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the 7 years that the show ran, I don't think I ever saw an entire episode.

    Some geeks flock to SMG and vampires I guess, others flock to Farscape.

    1. Re:Buffy who? by Squareball · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And others just love Elisha Cuthbert in 24! :) Buffy what??

    2. Re:Buffy who? by kfg · · Score: 0

      I have to admit I don't get this one either. I loved the movie. In fact it's one of my "cult" favorites, but I've never been able to sit through more than about 10 minutes of the TV show.

      But yes, I enjoy Farscape. I wouldn't say I "flock" to it, but it's a good show and holds my interest at least.

      There's no accounting for taste, and a lot of things simply boil down to that, but it does make me wonder if there's some fundamental aspect of psychology that might make one like one but not the other.

      KFG

    3. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i flock to both, and enterprise, and angel, and smallville, and firefly, and , and ,and
      does this make me a uber geek or just a traitor who can't pick sides?

    4. Re:Buffy who? by barfarf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny that, I didn't start watching Buffy either till it was well into in its fifth season, and I did it just to see what the hoopla was about. The first episode I saw was the last show of season two (as I later on found out).

      I was surprised that there was a lot of character depth and emotional intensity to it which I really didn't expect, especially given the frivolous title name. I'm not the addict of the show that some are, but I do think that there's a lot of stuff there that resonates with people. Clearly a lot of people relate to the emotions and human interaction, even if the storylines and action are completely unbelieveable.

    5. Re:Buffy who? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny


      In the 7 years that the show ran, I don't think I ever saw an entire episode.

      Some geeks flock to SMG and vampires I guess, others flock to Farscape


      Others flock to decent TV.

    6. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, I think you just plain watch too much TV.

    7. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Still others sell their TV on eBay starting at $1 with no reserve, and buy a life with the proceeds.

    8. Re:Buffy who? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Hey, hey, hey... Farscape DID start out well.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Buffy who? by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some geeks flock to SMG and vampires I guess, others flock to Farscape

      And the more discerning of us ignore both of those lousy shows and watch mostly Law and Order reruns and the Discovery science channel...

      Now that's some mighty fine viewing.

    10. Re:Buffy who? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 0

      Yeah.

      I never had a desire to watch. The name of the show just seems so stupid. Besides, I care more about sci-fi/politics than I do about vampires.

      Now if they did a Babylon 5 movie about a bunch of vampires running around the station sucking the life out of the 'French Dudes'(Centauri) I'd watch.

      Never forget 2/26/1993.

      --
      Huh?
    11. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crap. all these girls i ask out always say, "no. LOSER!". maybe this has something to do with TV. damn TV you make me loser, and dumb, stupid you me make tooo. I throw you out window you TV!

    12. Re:Buffy who? by Golias · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The subtle pleasures of the Buffy TV show takes about 10 episodes to fully appreciate, not 10 minutes (which is all it takes to understand everything the movie had to offer).

      For example, one thing that you can't get from a brief glimpse of the show is JW's willingness to kill off a character just as you are getting attached to them. He loves to set up expectations based on your previous TV-watching experience, and then go in a completely different direction.

      There's also the problem of anybody trying to tune in to current broadcasts (or recent reruns) and missing a lot of the context of what's being said and done. For example, I have one friend who's first experience watching BTVS was the season 5 episode, "The Body" (the one where Buffy comes home to discover her mother's corpse, finally taken by post-sugery complications) which is hailed as one of the best hours of television ever by those who follow the show, but utterly baffling to this friend of mine who saw it out of context after she had only seen the movie. She had a hard time seeing why I liked the show so much. Now that she's seen the first couple seasons of the show, she's yet another person who loves the show more than you are able to understand.

      Believe me when I say that there's a reason why Buffy is a favorite of nearly every published TV critic, and practically worshipped in geek circles. If you know somebody who owns the DVD's, I would strongly reccomend borrowing them and giving the show more of a fair chance.

      I would reccomend watching the two-part pilot, episode 3 ("The Witch"), and episode 11 ("Out of Mind, Out of Sight"). Then have a friend catch you up on the rest of season one and jump right into the season 2 DVD's, watching them in order. I think you will be surprised to discover how smart, funny, dramatic and groundbreaking this show really was.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too well educated to enjoy it? What a joke. Saying it is bad is one thing, but you are starting to sound like a stuck-up prick. I'd change my tone if that wasn't your intention.

    14. Re:Buffy who? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yeah, love watching Law and Order on TNT only to see a third of the screen taken up by an ad for another show, and a basket ball bouncing across the screen.

      The Discovery Channel is almost as bad. Cars driving across the screen, text bouncing around the corners of the screen. Annoying little sound effects in the middle of the show, etc.

      Yeah... Fine viewing...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:Buffy who? by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2, Funny
      Others flock to decent TV.

      Oxymoron if I've ever hear one...

      Decent TV???

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    16. Re:Buffy who? by Greedo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Popular Mechanics for Kids rules!

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    17. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are one of those stuck-up asshats who likes to brag about not owning a TV, you have no life beyond telling everybody that you don't own a TV. In other words, you are a weird, anti-social hermit, and the fact that your time is divided between shitty paperback novels and jerking off instead of watching TV does not earn you any respect from the rest of us. At all.

    18. Re:Buffy who? by amnesty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The SNR of television is so incredibly low, that I can understand why you think that. But there are actually a few gems that play out well on television.

      The strength of TV is that the medium allows you to have a visual novel. Movies suffer from incredibly flat characterizations, because there just isn't time for your to learn who people really are in two hours. The except to this are character movies, movies which pushes everything aside and make you learn who the people are.

      You can develop complicated storylines and have complicated people. The problem is, many shows don't.

      Why? Because it is much easier for someone flipping channels to stop and watch episodic shows that fall into a nice formula and don't depend on continuity. As in, it's not too confusing for the casual viewer. It's hard to plan your life around the television schedule.

      So on the other side, continuity heavy shows are completely incomprehensible to all except the core fans because they rely on the knowledge of years of development of both plot and character for the meaningful payoffs.

      Friends is (was) a good example of a show that managed to play both sides of the game. They kept continuity between episodes and continually changed the status-quo. They would trade apartments, date other people, even get married. Yet the stories were told in such a way that, if you watch carefully, you'll notice that they recap the key events in the first few minutes of conversation without feeling like "Last time on Friends..."

      Buffy, Angel, 24, Alias, these are continuity heavy shows that can lock out the casual viewer. They do require a heavy commitment to fully appreciate. In just last week's Buffy episode, they made a passing reference to a season one episode when a girl started to disappear when nobody payed any attention to her.

      And then there's the noise, everywhere, all the time. Shows that make you watch someone eat worms, or are ads for trading cards, or just plain insult your intellegence.

      But there is better stuff out there, if you care to give things a chance.

    19. Re:Buffy who? by satanami69 · · Score: 5, Informative

      OMG, you must see Old School. She's in hot pink underwear, on a bed laying on her stomache. Best ass shot without any flesh in a long time.

      Plus last weeks episode with her in the wifebeater. Oh yeah.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    20. Re:Buffy who? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did see a couple of episodes, fortunately for me I was too well educated to enjoy it.

      Do you look like the Big Lebowski? I can just picture him saying your comment.

      Unless, of course, you're too educated for the Cohen Brothers too.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you trying to say? Whenever someone micturates on a rug in this town, it's my problem?

    22. Re:Buffy who? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1



      Still more of us have given up on it entirely, except when we have to watch it to see news like 9/11.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    23. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The show often falls into the realm of being overly formulaic. Monster appears, Old Giles dives into the books, support team of Lesbians etc sometimes help, sometimes get stuck in situations but generally lead a charmed life waltzing around. Buffy wins whilst making often unfunny 'perky comments'. Ever played the xbox? her wisecrax (and I mean crax) are the worst part of the game.

      Don't try to fool us.. if it has any "cult" status with the geeks its for the lesbians and/or POONTANG ;) .. its a bit hard to watch quality programming like sopranoes and then watch that and find anything 'subtle' about it. Everybody is so pathetic in it. If you really like it thats cool, just I doubt its revered for any other reason than the obvious reason.

    24. Re:Buffy who? by DiveShark · · Score: 1

      The name of the show, and the horrible movie that "spawn"ed it were the initial reason's I refused to watch. However several of my friends got me into the show and I am eternally happy they
      did so.

      Aside from last season (#6) which generally sucked, the show has been great.

      The problem with Buffy is that the show makes you remember what previously happened. If you like to think while watching TV (another oxymoron) your choices were Buffy or TLC or The History Channel.

      --
      Fins Up, and to the Left... Any dive you come up from with air in reserve was a great dive. Nothing but bubbles left o
    25. Re:Buffy who? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I'll take your word for it, and I'll give it a shot, but only if you guaruntee me the pain will end eventually.

      Things like context and not knowing what's going on don't bother me at all. I watch about three Farscapes a season. I've never got any clue what's going on there either. But it's appealing

      I'm not an action movie sort of guy. I like subtlety. I can watch Jane Austen movies that go on for eons with nothing happening, ever, and enjoy every moment of it. I read Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire for hours at a time, not for the history but just to enjoy the flavor of the language that most people today find impenetrable.

      I try to watch Buffy, they say three words, and I'm bored to tears even though I think SMG is about the cutest thing to come down the pike since they invented puppies. I don't know what it is.

      KFG

    26. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, the thing is the the vampire killing is really just a side show. The real stuff is played out between the characters. Mostly, it's a good show because genuinely BAD STUFF happens, to the main characters usually, which many other TV shows avoid like the plague. The series got really dark in season 3, and whatever season is on Fox now is almost post-apocalyptic in atmosphere, and I wouldn't say there's much waltzing around going on. I don't see any wise cracks (or even crax), wonder what season you're refering to here. Most shows get better as the actors settle into their characters and develop some chemistry.

      Anyhow, you don't like the show, you don't like it, I'm just pointing out what makes it good for those who do.

    27. Re:Buffy who? by Scud_the_disposable_ · · Score: 1

      Hey, I watch TV all the time, and I turned out TV..

    28. Re:Buffy who? by Golias · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, I played the X-Box game, and yes, it was crap.

      But the X-Box jokes where not written by the ME writers, and the story lines of the TV series are nothing like what you describe. If you somehow mistook BTVS for a "moster of the week" show with lesbian titilation on the side, you probably didn't understand it.

      In fact, Willow's first kiss with Tara was probably the first ever non-exploitative lesbian kiss in TV history. The characters never kissed on camera for an entire season of being in a relationship, and the first on-screen kiss was during a moment when Willow was bawling her eyes out over the death of Buffy's mom, and Tara was comforting her. It was deliberatly done during a very un-sexy moment, to avoid the usual hype that surrounds TV girl-on-girl action, and respectfully depict a deeper relationship between to characters. There have been lots of lesbian couples on TV over the last 10 years or so, but Willow and Tara was the first one that could be taken seriously. Fuck you for trying to reduce it to mere "poontang."

      BTW: I consider "The Sopranos" to be the second-best program on TV today, but for different reasons. Tony Soprano's story resonates with people because we all feel the stress of competing needs of work and family. The stories on BTVS resonate with a lot of us, because we all went through the hell of High School, but Buffy takes the further step of turning shopworn genre conventions on their heads.

      As for your idea that the show is "formulaic," I'm guessing you never saw the episode "Passion," a very early (season 2) example of a "statement" episode, in which they clearly established that none of the cliche's of genre TV could be counted on to be followed.

      That, or you're just a trolling jackass.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    29. Re:Buffy who? by Golias · · Score: 1
      I'm right there with you on the Farscape thing. I also picked up on the show mid-way though, and while I had no idea what the hell was going on half the time, it was obvious that the show was vastly better than any recent flavor of Star Trek. In any case, it was certainly more fun.

      Seriously, though. I think you will grok Buffy if you give it a fair shake. In many ways, the language of the characters began to pop in such interesting ways by seasons 2 & 3 that there are entire web sites devoted to nothing but the way the Buffy cast talks.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    30. Re:Buffy who? by EnlightenedDuck · · Score: 1

      And there are those of us with taste who recognize that Law and Order is an excellent radio drama with optional visuals (had a reputation for watching at least 2 eps. a day in college), compulsively watch Buffy (I've missed one episode to date), and have a life. Several former roomates derided me for watching Buffy. Most of them became fans. One flagged an article on Buffy for me which was my introduction to Salon.

      --
      Quack!Quack!.....QUACK!!
    31. Re:Buffy who? by will_die · · Score: 1

      Farscape started off as a kiddy show with cute puppets, it got better.
      Buffy started off good, and went bad after season 5.

    32. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No I didn't see "Passion", I have seen a number of episodes but often I have been unable to respond to the story just because I don't enjoy it that much so generally I pay a lot less attention to it if its on.

      I don't particularly care that you take offence to it being reduced to poontang, like I said, if it means something to you.. thats cool. That being said I don't take it back either, the show relies heavily on marketing SMG as a sex symbol and the obligatory coverage of that side of it makes it kind of lame. Her silly comments are just irritating, they aren't folky, they aren't funny.. they are just poor. However, I am not american, and that is an american show- sometimes american sense of humour can be missed by outsiders (and assumably vice versa).

      If I watched an episode I could be more specific at what urks me about it, but its things like the conflict resolution, you know.. big scary powerful this and that, hyped up and then knocked over by Buffy who never really is shown to be "powerful", just seems to conveniently have a bit of power when it comes to the monster of the week/vampire scam of the week being foiled.

      Sorry if I offended but there always be naysayers.. even naysayers to one of the greatest scripted, dramatic masterpieces like The A-Team ! :)

    33. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laura Harris (The Faculty) is much cuter than Elisha Cuthbert. But nothing could make me watch that lame, mean-spirited show, and they've probably killed off her character by now anyway.

    34. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seen every episode of the show to date, I'm male and hetero, and SMG does nothing whatsoever for me as a sex symbol (and not much as an actor really, though she has astonishing screen chemistry with the excellent James Marsters - much more than she ever did with David Boreanaz). In fact I can honestly say that this is one show I've never watched for the attraction of any cast members (maybeAlyson Hannigan, but not really). It's other shows that I watch for the reasons you describe - I probably wouldn't watch The Dead Zone if not for Nicole de Boer, for instance.

      So why do I watch it? It's the writing. The acting is actually very solid and the directing tight and often innovative, but the writing just blows away anything else on TV. Even the relatively lame (except the musical) sixth season was better than anything else on TV.

      For reference, other shows I like: Stargate (also solidly written), Lexx (just utterly unique and irreverent), Alias (over-the-top but fun), and older shows like NewsRadio (quirky), Powerpuff Girls, South Park and the Simpsons (which ended a few years back as far as I'm concerned). But the only ones I'll make a point of seeing are Buffy and Angel. And I could miss Angel sometimes. ;)

    35. Re:Buffy who? by anaplasmosis · · Score: 1

      Subtle pleasures? It's tedious, predictable, trite garbage that should have died years ago, as soon as it was obvious that SMG was too old to be a high school student.

    36. Re:Buffy who? by disconnectedsmile · · Score: 1

      I don't want TV. I own a TV to watch movies which are far better than anything you find on TV. I also read a lot of books. Maybe you should pick one up sometime.

    37. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does this mean that the series will end as in conclusion (Lexx) or end as in cutoff (maybe Farscape)?

      Not many series get to end in a place that fits with the story as opposed to the network's descision.

    38. Re:Buffy who? by jgerman · · Score: 1

      I'd say add "Hush" (I think that was the name) to the list, I thought that was a well done episode. Though Buffy ended for me when it switched networks. I thought the last episode where Buffy sacrifices herself to stop Glory was a great ending to a tv show.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    39. Re:Buffy who? by maddskillz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I love that this got modded informative :)

    40. Re:Buffy who? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      There's also the problem of anybody trying to tune in to current broadcasts (or recent reruns) and missing a lot of the context of what's being said and done.

      Thats what happened to me. I can piece together what happened not too long ago, but there's still alot missing. Figures they cancel it as i start to get into it.

      I guess thats what the DVDs are for though. I liked it because it could be dark, but also funny. It feels alot more real then say Friends.

    41. Re:Buffy who? by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      It really sounds like you watched the movie and not the show. Sure there are the occasional wisecracks, like in the game, but most of the truly memorable quotes are a lot more inventive, and funny then that.
      The stories are a lot more creative then anything I can think of on TV. Albeit the new episodes aren't nearly as good as the old ones, but that goes for most shows, including "The Sopranos". You would realize this if you actually watched the show, but you would rather just watch a commercial about it, and formulate your opinion, and then troll about it on here

    42. Re:Buffy who? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The show often falls into the realm of being overly formulaic. Monster appears, Old Giles dives into the books, support team of Lesbians etc sometimes help, sometimes get stuck in situations but generally lead a charmed life waltzing around. Buffy wins whilst making often unfunny 'perky comments'. Ever played the xbox? her wisecrax (and I mean crax) are the worst part of the game.

      I liked it for reasons i stated in another post. Most episodes affect the characters in later episodes, it can be dark but funny, etc. You can see the characters changing as time goes on, unlike your average show.

      You can acuse most shows of being formulic, just like you you can with games. All RPGs are you fight some baddy, find out there's a bigger baddy, and you need to gain experience and find special items so that you can win. So that arguement holds little weight with me. I'd rather look at the story generated by the 'forumla' and decide if like that or not.

      Don't try to fool us.. if it has any "cult" status with the geeks its for the lesbians and/or POONTANG ;)

      I'm sure thats part of it, but if thats all it was i doubt anyone would like it.

      its a bit hard to watch quality programming like sopranoes and then watch that and find anything 'subtle' about it. Everybody is so pathetic in it. If you really like it thats cool, just I doubt its revered for any other reason than the obvious reason.

      Sopranoes? Please. I watched an episode, and found it highly boring. That show became popular overnight, and i think i know why. It was the current fad. A few people started raving about it, so other people watched, already convinced it was a great show. All good shows start off really bad. The simpsons, Star Trek TNG, Buffy. They were all corny or just not very good. Even as bad as some of the current Simpsons episodes have been, they are not as bad as its first season. But sopranoes started off great? Somehow i doubt that. Not saying its not possible, just saying its likely that it was a fad thing, like SUVs.

    43. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a TV to watch movies which are far better than anything you find on TV.

      That's a lot of money for 2 movies.

    44. Re:Buffy who? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Buffy, Angel, 24, Alias, these are continuity heavy shows that can lock out the casual viewer. They do require a heavy commitment to fully appreciate. In just last week's Buffy episode, they made a passing reference to a season one episode when a girl started to disappear when nobody payed any attention to her.

      With 24, i agree. With buffy, not so much. There is the long running plot which gets meantioned, but there's also the plot for that particular episode. I don't feel lost even though i just started watching about a month ago (doh). Of course i was curious how it started, so i started watching the first seaons on dvd. I guess i didn't get to the episode where the girl just disappears (or maybe i did :-) ).

    45. Re:Buffy who? by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      So you have no frame of reference here, Donny. You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and wants to know--

    46. Re:Buffy who? by curtisk · · Score: 1
      Last week, I left my 2 XP CDs on my dashboard in plain view. Someone broke into my car and left 2 more.

      LOL thats funny, how's that working out for ya?

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    47. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm... sounds just like a smoker who's confronted by an anti-smoker: nice down-to-earth, reasonable arguments not overwhelmed with emotion.

    48. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, anyone who is not just like you is evil and must be stamped out. I don't suppose you live in that "beacon of freedom" called the USA?

    49. Re:Buffy who? by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      Continuity is one of the things I like about anime. A 26 episode show lets you get to know the characters. The problem with with continuity in American shows is that they don't usually stop the show until its ratings go down. If they could say ahead of time "Here's where it'll end" I think it would be more interesting to watch.

    50. Re:Buffy who? by Xebikr · · Score: 1
      Buffy, Angel, 24, Alias...

      How telling is it that you just named my four favorite shows (and the only ones my wife and I watch every week)?

    51. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not to mention that Sarah Michelle isn't IN
      old school.. that'd be Elisha Cuthbert he's
      drooling over...

    52. Re:Buffy who? by RyanK · · Score: 1

      Ummm... That isn't SMG but rather Elisha Cuthbert, who plays Jack Bauer's daughter on 24.

      Now, back to our regularly scheduled fawning over Ms. Geller.

    53. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Donny, these men are cowards, they won't hurt you.

    54. Re:Buffy who? by wayward_son · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "In fact, Willow's first kiss with Tara was probably the first ever non-exploitative lesbian kiss in TV history. The characters never kissed on camera for an entire season of being in a relationship"

      But it was stupid and contrived. "OOH we're being 'CONTROVERSIAL'". Willow was straight for 3 1/2 seasons. (Remember Oz? Remember her crush on Xander?) It was a cheap plot device and a sign of shark bait.

    55. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Innovation" isn't one of those words in your vocabulary, is it?

    56. Re:Buffy who? by dschoettlin · · Score: 1
      The strength of TV is that the medium allows you to have a visual novel

      Or yet another weakness of TV the has lowered the average intelligence of this nation. The average person looks to the TV to provide visual imagery instead of reading a book and developing their own imagination. And this is one factor that has limited our innovation. The imagination to think of crazy shit.

    57. Re:Buffy who? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Did you watch Babylon5? It had a set story arc - 5 seasons.

      Unfortunately the last season and 1/4 got mangled into crap because TNT didn't make a decision on renewing the series for the 5th season. As such the 4th season got compressed and the 5th season wandered around aimlessly looking for a purpose. But Season 3 and most of Season 4 are some of the best storytelling I've ever seen. Realistically, S4 doesn't suck except for the last few episodes (excepting the last ep of S4, which is one of my favorites).

      Not many networks have the guts to do something like this though. Committing, in advance, to X many seasons of a show? Getting the actors to commit for the same time period? That's one helluva gamble. It's very much akin to New Line risking the entire studio on LOTR -- if they had failed it probably would've destroyed the studio. Fortunately it's been a big win, for both the studio and the fans. Unfortunately while B5 had a rabid following, it still didn't do well enough in the ratings to inspire similar attempts by others.

    58. Re:Buffy who? by Cookeisparanoid · · Score: 1

      The best SMG moment must be the lesbian kiss scene in Cruel Intentions. I kinda like her with dark hair as well.

    59. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh come on if someone is punched in the face for ten minutes what makes you think it will get less painfull after 10 hours ?

    60. Re:Buffy who? by greck · · Score: 1

      funny enough, they made a joke about the name of the show in this week's episode.

      I'm just a sucker for programming that doesn't take itself so seriously all the time.

    61. Re:Buffy who? by TomServo · · Score: 1

      While that first lesbian moment took place at a very "un-sexy moment", I think that even more importantly, they didn't advertise it. Almost any other show would advertise the hell out of that, trying to get all the "ooooh, lesbians kissin'!" crowd to show up and watch, but I don't remember that being advertised at all. It just sorta happened on the show, if memory serves.

      It was treated in almost the exact same way as the first kiss between a male & female character. I wish more shows could be like that, and not just sorta write in a situation like that to perk up ratings.

    62. Re:Buffy who? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, love watching Law and Order on TNT only to see a third of the screen taken up by an ad for another show, and a basket ball bouncing across the screen.

      Just pretend Jerry Orbach is playing basketball.

      Seriously though, I actually don't watch reruns a lot, on account of having seen just about every one of them. I like the new shows though.

      The Discovery Channel is almost as bad. Cars driving across the screen, text bouncing around the corners of the screen. Annoying little sound effects in the middle of the show, etc.

      Is that the Discovery Channel or the Discovery Science Channel? There's a big difference. I rarely watch the former, but love the latter.

    63. Re:Buffy who? by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      Some people can like both. Maybe she calls herself a lesbian because she's monogamous and the current person she's with is female, taking males out of the equation for her? As for her being straight for 3 1/2 seasons, this isn't exactly correct either. This was clearly a direction they were going since the middle of season 3. You could see it from the second ep. with the alternate universe Willow vamp (whatever that ep. was called).

    64. Re:Buffy who? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      What you are describing is the pretty much the way the first season went. One of the best things about "Buffy" is that it's evolved considerably. Virtually all of the characters have become "real people".

      What's happened is that the characters have all been thru incredible events, and it's changed their lives. Part of the change was due to clever writing, but in some ways I think it was almost a requirement that the writers couldn't avoid. As people, the characters simply couldn't ignore events like dying and being resurrected.

      I would match up the best Buffy episodes against *any* of the "quality" programming on television.

    65. Re:Buffy who? by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you something pendejo, you pull any of your crazy shit with us, you flash your piece out on the lanes, I'll take it away from you and stick it up your ass and pull the fucking trigger 'till it goes click

    66. Re:Buffy who? by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Vamp Willow was bi, if you remember correctly. She was all over Vamp Xander, and liked girls as well. The show acts as if Willow is 100% gay ever since Tara came around.

      Second of all, Vamp Willow liking girls didn't really sit well with regular Willow.

    67. Re:Buffy who? by filekutter · · Score: 1

      yep, i agree totally.... i didn't start watching till the reruns came on these last months, and i'm hooked. What a wonderful show! Whedon takes more chances than any other producer out there, making for a thoroughly enjoyable experience. In my mind the only TV show of that caliber was Twin Peaks.

      --
      I call computer-illiteracy job security
    68. Re:Buffy who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The A-Team?

      I really hope you're just trying to be funny. All I remember about the A-Team is that the plots were almost always the same formula, and despite the amount of bullets and explosions, the enemy only got thrown up in the air and knocked unconcious. Or just simply knocked unconcious.

    69. Re:Buffy who? by cvanaver · · Score: 1

      Having just chugged through the entire Sopranos set over Christmas and now working my way through '24', I think DVD's are the best way to expeience a continuuity-heavy show. No missing of episodes to throw you off, no building a schedule around the show, no waiting an entire week or (gasp) and entire summer to see how something plays out. Perhaps that means this is a third category outside of the quick cuts of TV and the medium-cuts of movies: the long-cuts of a DVD series.

    70. Re:Buffy who? by jafac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Naw, best ass-shot was in "Cruel Intentions" (I know, cheezy remake of another movie altogether), where she tells her step brother that if he wins the bet, he can have her and "anywhere you want", (as she's laying back on a bed, fully clothed) then she swings one leg up and over, showing him her ass - implying that she's up for anal.

      THAT was the best ass shot without showing any flesh. Of all time.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    71. Re:Buffy who? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Quality programming? Like "Sopranoes"? That show is shit.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    72. Re:Buffy who? by dsl · · Score: 0

      Don't try to fool us.. if it has any "cult" status with the geeks its for the lesbians and/or POONTANG ;)

      I'm sure thats part of it, but if thats all it was i doubt anyone would like it.


      That's not true. Someone would like it, but it would be the someones who have to catch every episode of Baywatch - not remotely the same crowd that follows Buffy.

      --
      I refuse, on principle, to have a .sig.
    73. Re:Buffy who? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Episode was called Dopplegangland and yeah, even real world Willow noticed that Vampire Willow was gay. They did the goodbye hug thing and Vamp Willow grabbed her ass. Later she said something about thinking that in the other world "I'm kind of gay".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    74. Re:Buffy who? by Golias · · Score: 1
      But it was stupid and contrived. "OOH we're being 'CONTROVERSIAL'".

      That's just the thing though. There is nothing controversial about Willow's relationship with Tara. The kiss was never hyped (and inserted into an episode that would be hyped for completely different reasons). If anything, they were very careful to avoid the cheap sensationalism that usually comes with lesbians on TV.

      If you think it's so unusual for a lesbian to have had relationships with (and crushes on) guys while in High School, you need to talk to more lesbians. It's actually fairly common for lesbians to discover the gay side of themselves later in life.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    75. Re:Buffy who? by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

      This is a bit off topic but I don't watch Buffy so I can't really comment. I did watch quite a bit of the Sopranos though, and what I really began to loath about that show was that no one ever changed. A lot of the characters seemed to want to be a better person, or grow or change in some way. Yet they always fall back into their old ways, just when it looks like they are going to succeed. After a while there was really no one on the show that I found to be likeable.

    76. Re:Buffy who? by Squareball · · Score: 1

      Oh man the wifebeater thing was AWESOME! Got a great quality AVI of it if you want it :) AIM - ShockSlave

    77. Re:Buffy who? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I actually don't watch reruns a lot, on account of having seen just about every one of them

      Same here, but occasionally there is one I haven't yet seen. Thanks to TNT, I don't bother at all.

      Is that the Discovery Channel or the Discovery Science Channel?

      I was refering to the former.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    78. Re:Buffy who? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Farscape [...] got better.

      If by "got better" you mean it turned into a soap-opera in space where the entire show is about who is sleeping with who, and characters yelling and bitching at each other, then yes, I suppose. I would consider that a steep down-turn.

      Buffy started off good

      Ah, here's a strong sign that you must think a bunch of superficial characters and their childish social problems make for a "good" show.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    79. Re:Buffy who? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      and maybe your trying to justify the obviously contrived rating grab?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    80. Re:Buffy who? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      That's not true. Someone would like it, but it would be the someones who have to catch every episode of Baywatch - not remotely the same crowd that follows Buffy.

      True, but probably not enough to justify a 2nd season after a 12 episode midseason replacement. My point was that the lesbains and such aren't the only (or main) reason that people like it.

    81. Re:Buffy who? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes i don't know why i bother replying to an AC...

      I think it is. ST TNG is innovative because it explores the full human potential, and asks alot of questions about ourselves, while providing action and entertainment. The Simpons was innovative because it can make fun of anything, and is constantly reinventing itself. Buffy's formula is innovative because it takes your standard 90210 crapfest, but adds in the demon and vampire world and some humor.

      All those shows follow a formula, but thier formula is much more unique then the standard drivel.

    82. Re:Buffy who? by lazarius · · Score: 1

      Example (the only one I can think of right now, but I'm sure others will add...):

      The zombies episode -

      Giles (ironic): "See my mask? Isn't it pretty? it raises the dead. *sigh* Americans"

      --
      Beware the JabberOrk.
    83. Re:Buffy who? by lazarius · · Score: 1

      What you are describing is the pretty much the way the first season went. One of the best things about "Buffy" is that it's evolved considerably. Virtually all of the characters have become "real people".

      Hell, even the bad guys evolve over time and eventually the watcher can see some of the reasons why they did whatever they did. Look at the geek guy from the trio (the short one) ... he's actually been in the show as a recurring character since season 1.

      MIKE

      --
      Beware the JabberOrk.
    84. Re:Buffy who? by lazarius · · Score: 1

      as soon as it was obvious that SMG was too old to be a high school student.

      Hence, that brief stint with Buffy in college, and now with Buffy having a job at the HS.

      MIKE

      --
      Beware the JabberOrk.
    85. Re:Buffy who? by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      Best quote to date on "The Sopranoes" : How you doin'?

  6. Somewhat glad... by tmhsiao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After dealing with some sub-par allegory and poor storytelling in the third to sixth seasons, I'm kinda happy that the series will end with this season, where the writing has appeared to improve despite Joss Whedon's attention to Firefly.

    --
    "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    1. Re:Somewhat glad... by Golias · · Score: 1
      After dealing with some sub-par allegory and poor storytelling in the third to sixth seasons,

      Woah, woah, woah. Back up.

      Buffy came in as a mid-season replacement, so you are saying you only thought the show was up to par for a season and a half!? Only to "appear" to improve this year? Why do you even care enough to post here?

      Also, for the record, SMG's decision to leave is not an official declaration that the show is ending. They might have to take the name "Buffy" out of the title, but if Whedon, Espenson, Noxon & Fury are still on board, it's still going to be better than pretty much anything else on broadcast TV. Several cast members, including Alyson Hannigan & Nicholas Brendon, are signed on for two more years of BVTS, but are not signed in any way to any spin-off. This means that if Mutant Enemy wants to keep the other two of the big stars of the show locked in, they gotta find a way to continue the series with a new slayer. (It probably won't be Faith, as Dushku has already signed to star in a different show.)

      I'm so fucking sick of all these "go out on top"/"don't jump the shark"/"Don't overstay your welcome" jackasses calling for the show to end while it's still good. The fact that the final two seasons of X-Files were horse shit did nothing to diminish what a great show it was in its prime. If a long-running show has even the potential to be good, I say keep producing it as long as people are willing to watch. Sometimes shows bounce back from slumps. Some of the best episodes of Cheers and M*A*S*H were made after the shows went through major cast changes.

      Those of you who dig the show, keep hope alive.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Somewhat glad... by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I have to agree completely, except that I place the point of suckage around halfway through season 4. Season 4 had one or two good episodes, but I felt it was mostly poorly written and the story-arc was mostly filler. Adam wasnt a terrible main villain though.

      Season 5 completely blew. The season was maybe 80 percent filler and the story arc was completely one dimensional. Glory made no sense whatsoever as a villain. She was supposedly a "god" though she had no powers except being stronger than buffy. Why she behaves like a valley girl with an IQ of 70 I cannot fathom, especially if she is thousands of years old. This season spent too much time harping on xander/anya and willow/tara. The addition of a "little sister" (probably to bring back episodes involving school or teenagers) was very poorly done.

      Season 6 was more of the same, only worse. The musical episode was funny, but the rest pretty much sucked. Actually no, the 3 geeks were funny for about 10 minutes. Was there even a story arc? Yeah for the last 2 episodes or so. And yes, take out buffy with a single bullet so we can all ask "why the fuck havent the vampires been using guns for the past 6 seasons."

      Season 7 sucked from begining to end. I dont think anyone is actually writing for the show anymore, and everyone just ad-libs as they change sets and film. Its sort of like when youre working on a programming project that you know can't go anywhere, but it pays better than staying home, so you keep showing up to get paid. Note that Joss Whedon moved on a while ago; sort of like how everyone good left Netscape around the time that IE started shipping with windows lol omen.

    3. Re:Somewhat glad... by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      Buffy came in as a mid-season replacement, so you are saying you only thought the show was up to par for a season and a half!?

      Yes. Par for Buffy is not par for the rest of broadcast television.

      Only to "appear" to improve this year? Why do you even care enough to post here?

      Because I have a deep, deep devotion to Buffy despite the fourth and fifth seasons. I've created websites for it. I'm still writing code for it.

      And finally, because if we don't question the faults we find in the art that we love, then we might as well just sit, slack-jawed, staring at the television, chuckling to ourselves like Beavis and Butt-head at SMG's nice boobies.

      I'm so fucking sick of all these "go out on top"/"don't jump the shark"/"Don't overstay your welcome" jackasses calling for the show to end while it's still good... Sometimes shows bounce back from slumps. Some of the best episodes of Cheers and M*A*S*H were made after the shows went through major cast changes.

      Indeed, that's what I'm seeing with season seven.

      But forcing a story to go on when the primary party/parties responsible for that story do not wish to continue would be simple profit-seeking. I would liken it to trying to force some other writer to write Sandman for DC/Vertigo comics after Neil Gaiman has finished his part of the story.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    4. Re:Somewhat glad... by Golias · · Score: 1
      But forcing a story to go on when the primary party/parties responsible for that story do not wish to continue would be simple profit-seeking.

      As far as I'm concerned, the "primary parties responsible" for Buffy are not named Gellar, Hannigan, Head & Brendan. They are named Whedon, Noxon, Espinson, Fury, and Greenwaldt. As long as the Mutant Enemy writing crew remains intact, whatever it produces is bound to be good. Whedon's people seem to have a knack for finding good actors, too. Every major actor added to the show over the years (to play Anya, Dawn, Tara, Robin Wood, etc.) has been fantastic.

      This is why I am convinced that a post-Gellar slayer show can easilly be terrific. SMG is a talented actress, but there are thousands of talented actresses bussing tables in shitty LA restaurants as we speak. It's good writers that are hard to find.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Somewhat glad... by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      They are named Whedon, Noxon, Espinson, Fury, and Greenwaldt.

      Actually, I'd daresay we're missing too many stellar writers. Whedon, of course, is quite capable, but I've found that Marti Noxon's writing and plotting to be far too concerned with interpersonal relationships. In an interview from an early issue of the Buffy Fan Club Magazine, Noxon indicates she wants to bring more "smoochies" to the show; while I can appreciate some elements of it in the series, the focus that fourth, fifth, and sixth season placed on sex and relationship robbed those seasons of effective plotting, and sometimes, in extreme cases, effective character work ("Where the Wild Things Are"... anyone?).

      Of Espenson and Fury, I generally like their episodes, but not with the same fervor that I've appreciated episodes by Rob Des Hotel and Dean Batali, Ty King, Dan Vebber, and Tim Minear.

      Greenwaldt is currently working on ABC's Miracles, and doesn't really have an active role in Buffy/Angel.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    6. Re:Somewhat glad... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Damn, how could I forget to mention Tim Minear!? He's written several of my favorites!

      Anyway, you get the idea. It's the writers that make Buffy a cut above other TV shows. Specifically, it's Joss Whedon.

      As for Marti Noxon, don't be a playa hata. She gets a bad rap for being the person who wrote the Buffy/Spike "rough sex" scene, but she's also written some great episodes, and the direction of season 6 (which I actually liked) was every bit as much Joss's idea as it was Marti's.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Somewhat glad... by mpe · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned, the "primary parties responsible" for Buffy are not named Gellar, Hannigan, Head & Brendan. They are named Whedon, Noxon, Espinson, Fury, and Greenwaldt. As long as the Mutant Enemy writing crew remains intact, whatever it produces is bound to be good. Whedon's people seem to have a knack for finding good actors, too. Every major actor added to the show over the years (to play Anya, Dawn, Tara, Robin Wood, etc.) has been fantastic.

      But can Mutant Enemy find a broadcaster who will not try and interfere. Otherwise you could end up with another "Firefly".

    8. Re:Somewhat glad... by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I got tired of the show after the second season, and stopped watching it when they turned into a social propaganda engine.
      I liked Angel better. The writting used to be better, but the writing has gotten old lately. Like the world was ending and instead of going out and saving the world, one character decides to screw the son of the guy she loves. WTF?
      I will stick with Stargate SG-1. I am currently watching seasons 5 and 6 at the same time.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    9. Re:Somewhat glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really funny how every time this puerile show is mentioned on Slashdot you rack up some 20+ comments demonstrating your zealotry.

      I have seen every episode of Buffy, and it's not even 1% as good as you blather on about. The show is very formulaic and predictable. I watch it because there's nothing else on, and it can be mildly amusing.

      But here you are, again, professing if people just only watched it, even if they already have, they would see how it's a fucking paragon of entertainment. It's dead, and as a person that has watched it from the beginning, I'll be glad to finally see it go.

      I don't care if it pisses you off. I've seen you babble on multiple occasions, and I think you need to fucking get some therapy, because you show signs of being seriously disturbed.

    10. Re:Somewhat glad... by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      As for Marti Noxon, don't be a playa hata. She gets a bad rap for being the person who wrote the Buffy/Spike "rough sex" scene, but she's also written some great episodes, and the direction of season 6 (which I actually liked) was every bit as much Joss's idea as it was Marti's.

      While one of my favorite episodes of the entire series is her "Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered" where she uses her love of "smoochies" and milks some pretty funny relationship situations, I'm more referring to some of her pre-season six episodes, like "Dead Man's Party" and "Consequences," both episodes where she foregoes characterization for spectacle (in the former the big zombie fight to "resolve" the Scooby strife, and in the latter, the strangling of Xander to show Faith is evil).

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    11. Re:Somewhat glad... by Saige · · Score: 1

      Season 7 sucked from begining to end.

      Wow, you mean you've seen the end of the season already? Can you give us the tapes - and maybe also to the show's creators? I'm sure they'd like to know how the final episodes are going to turn out, as they haven't filmed them yet.

      Your comment reminds me of those wonderful Amazon reviews where everyone's so glowing/negative about something before it's even released. Such quality work there.

      I think this season is doing quite well - it's really creating such a dark, forboding atmosphere, one that's darker than even the darkest points of the second season. The last couple episodes are starting to make me feel that Buffy herself is giving up, becoming convinced she can't possibly win this one. Not just a temporary frustration, but like a complete sense of giving up throughout her. It's almost like she's wanting to die.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    12. Re:Somewhat glad... by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      I will stick with Stargate SG-1. I am currently watching seasons 5 and 6 at the same time.

      Somewhat OT, but just so ya know, season 5 is widely regarded by most of SG-1 fandom as the weakest season of the series. Most people consider the two year period from mid-S1 to mid-S3 to be the strongest, although S4 had its moments and S6 is finally pulling itself out of the quagmire (hopefully to improve with the return of Michael Shanks as Daniel in S7). I'd strongly recommend catching repeats of the older eps next time Sci-Fi runs them, or buying the DVD box sets, rather than bothering with S5 reruns (just read the summaries on Gateworld instead, you're not missing much).

      To get back on-topic, gotta agree with you on Buffy. By the time the third season began, I didn't even recognize the show anymore.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    13. Re:Somewhat glad... by Ioldanach · · Score: 1
      Like the world was ending and instead of going out and saving the world, one character decides to screw the son of the guy she loves. WTF?

      Just a side-note, since that's a bit off-topic. To put that in perspective, Cordelia just spent several episodes preparing and releasing Angelus into the world. My wife noted she's been acting wierd ever since she returned from wherever it was she went. So, is it really her? If it is, what changed? The episode where she released Angelus threw a real wrench into the audience's assumptions, and suddenly her recent actions are thrown into disarray until we find out why she did that.

      Personally, I'd have to say that's the first interesting turn the show's taken in several seasons. I generally only find out what's going on because my wife watches it, I'd pretty much given up on the series seasons ago.

  7. Thats the last straw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn you Sadam!.. now we bomd the crap out of Iraq!!!!

    1. Re:Thats the last straw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No -- Clinton cancelled Buffy.

    2. Re:Thats the last straw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, typical US response.

      I'm unhappy... let's go bully somebody else

  8. It's over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thank God....

  9. The really shocking thing... by astrashe · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is that they're making a sequel to the Scooby-Doo movie.

    1. Re:The really shocking thing... by mc_wilson · · Score: 4, Funny

      actually, the shocking thing would be a sequel to Dude Wheres My Car!

    2. Re:The really shocking thing... by computer_redneck · · Score: 0

      actually, the shocking thing would be a sequel to Dude Wheres My Car!

      There was talk about a sequel about a year ago. The working title was "Seriously, Dude, Where's my car". The last I heard it was cancelled due to the actor Sean William Scott deciding he was not going to do it.
      I think the world is saved but I would like to see a sequel to "Killer Klowns from Outer Space" Thank God it came out on DVD finally.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BF
    3. Re:The really shocking thing... by computer_redneck · · Score: 0

      Well since I do not know how to go back and edit my post here is something I stumbled across.

      There is going to be a sequel expected to be released in 2004. I did a little research on Google and it seems it is a go and Sean William Scott will not be in it.

      So maybe the world will end.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BF
    4. Re:The really shocking thing... by dthable · · Score: 1

      but I would like to see a sequel to "Killer Klowns from Outer Space"

      Please god, say it ain't so. The first one was amusing for the first 20 minutes when the whole concept was introduced. By the middle of the movie, I had to resort to the bottle of 151. Who know what would be needed for the sequel.

    5. Re:The really shocking thing... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      I'm so sorry...

      Seriously Dude, Where's My Car? [imdb.com]


      +1, Stupefying

    6. Re:The really shocking thing... by Frohboy · · Score: 1

      Wow... this thread is really eerie... I just got back yesterday from visiting a friend on the other side of the country. Among other things, we spent our time together watching The Scooby-Doo Movie, Dude, Where's My Car?, and the last six episodes of Buffy.

      I thought that admitting that would make me feel better, but now I just feel sort of dirty.

    7. Re:The really shocking thing... by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      I wonder, do their gf's still have those awesome neclaces they got for giving the 2 nordic dudes back the continium transfunctioner? that would be sweet

    8. Re:The really shocking thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have any idea just how lame you truly are?

    9. Re:The really shocking thing... by shamrock_shake1 · · Score: 1

      Another sign of the coming apocolypse.

    10. Re:The really shocking thing... by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I thought Dude, Where's my Car was a pretty good, er... entertaining movie, like Bill & Ted only with more stupidity and gratuitous latex.

    11. Re:The really shocking thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be hilarious. I can't imagine what the plot would be, but I'd see it :D

    12. Re:The really shocking thing... by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      This is actually not that shocking, considering, Scooby-Doo
      was the 12th most successful movie of 2002, and made over 150 Million domestic gross.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  10. Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Pyrosophy · · Score: 5, Funny


    After the picture on the site it's linking to, I might be thinking "vest" too... and other words that end in the sound made by "est"...

    1. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by MrWa · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know what you were thinking about. Looking at that picture it probably shouldn't be "breast", though, because there aren't any.

    2. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wanted to hit both "breast" and "chest", but you're right that one might be more appropriate than the other.

      I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm not too choosy in this category, but why does every actress have to look so emaciated lately? Maybe you can't model the latest Gucci but at least no one would be able to see your frickin bones...

      Buffy's cute, but give me Buffy looking healthy (and silicon-free) any day.

    3. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Preach it! There is nothing more disgusting to me than protruding bones.

      As for the silicon, I dunno, cyborg Buffy could be kind of cool. SiliCONE, on the other hand, is no good (granted, silicone does contain silicon, but I'll be pedantic anyway).

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    4. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1


      Actually, spelling errors are a little more disgusting to me, so thanks!

      Maybe I'll start a new sig:

      ---
      ---
      Silicone: Ruining perfectly good pr0n for 30+ years.

    5. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Nice rack.

      If you look close, there's some right nipple action going on too. :)

      Never forget 2/26/1993.

      --
      Huh?
    6. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

      cyborg Buffy could be kind of cool
      I was a big Buffybot fan. Second best robot Warren ever made. I agree about the bones. SMG used to be attractive when she had a little meat on her.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    7. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by danox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Man, you really need a girlfriend.

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
    8. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's like two asprins on an ironing board.

      Ben

    9. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

      Howabout German? "Zat vas uber "vest" show in Germany, Ve love ze David Hasselhoff, yes?"

      Personally I think its one of the "vurst" things on TV.... ::basks in his bad pun::

      --
      ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    10. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful
      While she is certainly an attractive woman, SMG has always been one of those Hollywood women who really needs to eat a sandwitch sometime.

      People didn't notice how skinny she was in the early seasons of Buffy, because she wore a padded bra on the show in those days, which created the illusion of a healthy figure. Once she became a big enough star to insist that she didn't want to wear fake boobs anymore, it became very obvious what a skinny woman she really is.

      I'm right there with you on this point. You can keep the Jenifer Garners and Calista Flockharts of the world. They're all knees and elbows. I like woman-shaped women. I like soft curves. Can I get a witnes?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by aeoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What a useless comment.

    12. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Enonu · · Score: 1

      Man she has a hot sternum!

    13. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with taking a quick look for stuff like that?

      It's not an indication of being sex starved, it's an indication of being a guy who likes female body parts. :) Especially those parts.

      --
      Huh?
    14. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by binarybum · · Score: 1

      C'mon now, wouldn't you stutter too trying to spit out such a laughable statement as saying that buffy is one of the best shows on television? That couldn't have been easy.

      ex. "reality television is the grape
      greatest thing to come our way since seppuku:

      --
      ôó
    15. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

      Man, what is she like 24 and they're already that low?!?! I see a certian surgury in her future.

    16. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only chest-shots in the show are of Spike. Hmm, like when Ana searches his room for signs of evil doings and he's sleeping naked in the background...... ah, I certainly will miss Buffy.

      ~Too lazy to login~

    17. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Amen, Brother!

      In fact, I think SMG has gotten much skinnier in the last few seasons. All you need to do is look at her face. She used to have something resembling cheeks in the early episodes but now she looks like Skeletor on crack.

      EAT A FREAKING SANDWICH!!!

      Of course, Emma Caufield is rapidly approaching Ethiopian status as well...

    18. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I like the cut of your jib, sailor. Give me a call.

    19. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by chigaze · · Score: 1

      My first thought upon seeing that picture was "Eat Lunch!", rib cages are not particularly attractive.

    20. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's an indication of being 14.

      Especially if you call it "nipple action".

    21. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he sez to me, "I don't like the cut of your jib" and I sez "IT'S THE ONLY JIB I GOT, BABY!"

    22. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by jafac · · Score: 1

      One thing about SMG - she works out a lot, in fact, her hobby is kickboxing (or taebo, or something like that), and this, I think was a very good thing for her in this part, because she was mostly a pretty believable fighter in scenes where they didn't use a stunt double. In my opinion, a lot of women who try to play a "fighter" type, just have bad form. I've even seen women who are black-belts, who just have bad form, and they don't really look like good fighters. It's partially posture, and partially their agression and commit when throwing punches, or blocking. SMG, as an actress, dispelled that for me. I don't know if she's really a good fighter, or not. But she moves like one. (and actually, she started out in the first season as having a lot of hesitation and visible weakness, and greatly improved over the years). And if it makes her figure skinny, and less curvy, then that's fine. As long as she doesn't look like that chick from the Plasmatics.

      What's unattractive about Callista Flockhart is that she looks like you'd crush her hand when you shook it. I don't think SMG has that quality about her at all.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    23. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always preferred Charisma Carpenter over SMJ for this very reason...

    24. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      It's like a relief map of Kansas.

      --
      bp
    25. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Amen!

    26. Re:Freudian Slip (er, vest?) by Ellen+Ripley · · Score: 1

      SMG has always been one of those Hollywood women who really needs to eat a sandwitch sometime.

      Well, she does, according to some of the fanfic I've read.

      Oh, wait, sandwitch? Never mind.

  11. Buffy was my inspiration by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Any time a bad girl got me down and ignored me and played with my heart and wallet, Buffy was an adequate mode to relax by romantically. She was a fantastic celebrity and she will be missed by me and many who are like me.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, I missed the section of the article where they said that "all the cast will be taken out and ritually shot at the conclusion of filming the last episode". I suppose that's why you'll miss them, since obviously their careers will be over and they'll never do anything else again.

    2. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      He he ha! No I don't want any of them to die because of this! I meant to say it was only a good show and relieved from my misery and sorrow when girlfriends got scarce sometimes.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    3. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Quarters · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Buffy was... She was a fantastic celebrity..." You've a bit of a problem with that whole fantasy/reality thing, don't you?

    4. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any time a bad girl got me down and ignored me and played with my heart and wallet, Buffy was an adequate mode to relax by romantically. She was a fantastic celebrity and she will be missed by me and many who are like me.

      In the interest of efficiency, I feel you should have refrained from beating around the bush and limited this comment to "I jerk off to Buffy everynight".

      Good day to you sir.

    5. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      Good one too... I generally don't do that, but if I did it would be Buffy!

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    6. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RIght, because DeForrest Kelly and George Takei had such varried and successful careers after Star Trek. Oh, and who can forget all those hillarious sitcoms starring Alan Alda after MASH ended? Oh, and not a single one of the three shows starring the former Seinfeld cast has been anything less than a runaway hit, right?

      The truth is, most actors who star in a long-running show never reach the same level of success. For every Ted Danson and Kelsey Grammer theres... well, there's the rest of the cast of Cheers. What's the guy who played Cliff doing these days?

    7. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damnit, I wish we could mod people +1 Liar.

    8. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or at the very least "-1 TMI"

    9. Re:Buffy was my inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. Geeks jerk off to Willow.

  12. At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when Sliders was left with only Remy as the original member of the cast on the show? Or when Adrian Paul didn't really want to do a 6th season of Highlander and didn't appear in half the episodes? It just doesn't work when the main character (Quinn or Duncan or Buffy) is gone. Let it go.

    1. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember when Sliders was left with only Remy as the original member of the cast on the show?

      No, because I stopped watching not long after Rhys-Davies was replaced by Kari Wuhrer*, and they started blatantly ripping off sci-fi movies for their alternate earths and/or plots. :-)

      A show with a rabid fanbase is better off going out on a high note. Besides, why overextend the show's lifespan when you can milk it much more effectively selling episode DVDs to aforementioned rabid fanbase?

      ~Philly

      *Sure, Wuhrer was a piece of ass (though it was Sabrina Lloyd who really melted me), but she couldn't act for shit-- and when you've got bad material to work with, that only magnifies the overall crappiness.

    2. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, Kari was the best thing about Sliders :-) I don't care if she can't act when someone like that is on the show heh

    3. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Golias · · Score: 1
      It just doesn't work when the main character (Quinn or Duncan or Buffy) is gone. Let it go.

      I disagree. Cheers got better, nor worse, after half of the main relationship (Diane) left.

      Also, Mystery Science Theater 3000 was still hillarious after Joel left the show. Mike & the bots made for great TV. It didn't start to suck until they lost a lot of personel during the move to the Sci Fi channel, and was still pretty good until they lost the guy who did Dr. Forrester & Crow.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      " Or when Adrian Paul didn't really want to do a 6th season of Highlander "

      Jesus Christ- there were 5 series of Highlander?

      This is the stuff that pisses me off- they cancel Firefly, Odyssey 5 and Birds of Prey after a single season and there were 5 series of Highlander? What the hell is the world coming to?

      Especially Odyssey 5 was a fantastic series. It gets cancelled after one series and yet other stuff carries on regardless. Charmed, anyone? Like, hell no.

      graspee

    5. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      I Suspect that Highlander cost a fraction of the price to make.....

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    6. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by schon · · Score: 1

      This is the stuff that pisses me off- they cancel Firefly, Odyssey 5 and Birds of Prey after a single season and there were 5 series of Highlander? What the hell is the world coming to?

      Well, I (for one) actually liked Highlander. I'm sure that other people did, too.

      That aside, there are other reasons that Highlander stayed around so long (even after it became stale.)

      Highlander is (mostly) a Canadian TV show. (The first few seasons were filmed in Vancouver, but even when it moved to Paris, it was still being produced by a Canadian company.)

      Canadian TV shows enjoy a special place in the world of TV - Canadian TV producers get subsidies from the government to produce these shows, and filming in Canada is cheaper than filming in Hollywood (which makes the shows much cheaper for the networks to buy), and the (Canadian) networks have incentive to play them because of CRTC can-con rules (something like 1/3 of your shows have to be Canadian in origin, the 'Canadian-ness' of which is based on some obscure formula - you get partial credit based on where it's shot, where the production is based, etc..)

      It all adds up to making the Canadian networks (which usally own the production companies) reluctant to get rid of these shows - they're cheap, and it keeps the CRTC off their backs.

    7. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Well, if you like Highlander, good for you- and sorry I implied it was worse than the shows I mentioned.

      The Canadian Situation seems interesting- I wish shows I liked were Canadian.

      graspee

    8. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Highlander was one of the best shows ever made.

      An Immortal playboy swordsman who goes thru the centuries laying beautiful women and decapitating his enemies. What more could you possibly ask for?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    9. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "An Immortal playboy swordsman who goes thru the centuries laying beautiful women and decapitating his enemies. What more could you possibly ask for?"

      How about about an Immortal playgirl swordswoman who goes through the centuries laying her enemies and decapitating beautiful men ?

      graspee

    10. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Noren · · Score: 1

      It was tried- the spinoff Raven only lasted one season.

    11. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by schon · · Score: 1

      if you like Highlander, good for you-

      It wasn't until reruns that I started watching it - I saw the first few episodes and couldn't stand it.. but Adrian Paul's acting did improve dramatically over the course of the show, and the swordfights were reasonably well coreographed..

      I wish shows I liked were Canadian.

      Maybe you do, and you just don't know it :o)

      Andromeda and Stargate SG1 are a couple that get mentioned in a positive light here on occasion.. (and are similar Genre as other shows you mentioned.)

    12. Re:At least it won't be Dawn the Vampire Slayer by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see, I am a big fan of SG1 but they damn near cancelled that a while back too.

      I am sorry for slagging off Highlander now- I can't see its merits, but I reminded myself too much of the people slagging Buffy off and lo! I was ashamed...

      But the cancellation of Farscape, Odyssey 5, Birds of Prey and Firefly annoyed me. Especially Odyssey 5 since it must be quite cheap to make- they even had an in-joke where the main characters were explaining the "real" plot of the show to a SF writer to get his input on their problems and someone said that having artificial humans as villians was just what TV did to cut make-up costs...

      I can see why people disliked Firefly, but I think it had potential- most great shows improve a lot over the series.

      Birds of prey was not too cerebral- but it had chix (tm) and ok fights and special effects. Yes, it was very "monster of the week", but it was still fun to watch, and there was the promise of a lot of interesting characters from the comic to be brought in.

      I just hate being reminded that US TV shows are all about "how much does it cost to make per episode?" and "What are the viewing figures and demographic so we can sell adverts?".

      Even our beloved BBC in the UK, with no advertising caters very often to the lowest common demoninator and relies on viewing figures- hence the cancellation of Dr. Who (over 10 years' ago now, but I'm *still* bitter).

      graspee

  13. Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Dr.+Jest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She's killing Buffy so she can make more Scooby Doo movies? This season doesn't feel like it's the end of the story. It's too soon to call it quits. Besides, look at the movies that SMG has made. They're all crap. She clearly should not be allowed on film, unless (maybe) it's a Buffy movie. Note that she said "in this incarnation" (though she could have been referring to the comics. Oh, well. I blame Prinze for this. And cancer.

    1. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This season doesn't feel like it's the end of the story.

      Excuse me? She's the "last guardian of the Hellmouth" AND she's battling the FIRST EVIL. How much more does she have to do?

    2. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, look at the movies that SMG has made. They're all crap.

      Clearly, you did not see Cruel Intentions. I'm sure it had a plot, but I didn't notice. :-)

    3. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it had a plot

      It was based on the Pierre Choderlos de Laclos novel "Les Liaisons Dangereuses". A French literary classic (so I'm told).

    4. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by stevey · · Score: 1

      The only movie I've seen her in was Cruel Intentions - but I really enjoyed that.

      Scooby Doo I didn't see, and have no intention of watching, but after Cruel Intentions, and Buffy itself, I do think she's a good actress.

      She could do well in films in the future .. she has talent and she's a babe ;)

    5. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Prinze changed his name to some sort of wierd symbol!?!

    6. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason to blame him for cancer.

    7. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar's movie career by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I doubt that. I expect it was based on the movie "Dangerous Liaisons", which itself may have been somewhat based on said French novel.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  14. What a shame by Lurgen · · Score: 1

    I've never been a big Buffy fan. In fact, I would be surprised to learn I've seen more than 10 episodes.

    But they've been playing the advertising for the current season every time I look at the TV lately, and I have somehow started to want to watch it. Maybe the advertising works, maybe it's just because she's damn sexy, or maybe it's because I've been impressed by the complicated plots.

    My friends all watch it, and I keep hearing about complex plot developments that are tangled not only between episodes, but between seasons.

    There's not a lot of worthwhile television on these days. It'd be a shame to see this one go before I have a chance to see it all.

    (incidently, whoever canned this series is probably the same maniacal genious who cancelled Futurama - my all-time favorite animated series!)

    1. Re:What a shame by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      You can catch edited episodes of Buffy daily on FX, and old eps of Futurama on Cartoon Network. I think Cartoon is also going to be showing new episodes of Futurama, too, but I'm not as well-informed about that series.

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    2. Re:What a shame by Chuck+Milam · · Score: 1

      You can catch edited episodes of Buffy daily on FX...

      How are the episodes edited? Are they edited for content or just so FX can squeeze four episodes into a 24-hour period (which they were doing in 2002, I believe).

      I always thought the sure sign of a show's demise was when I could catch more than one episode a day in syndication/reruns. I think on some days I can see 5-6 episodes of Buffy if I wanted to. Talk about Slayer overload. With so much exposure, it doesn't take long to get to "Bored Now," no matter how good the show.

    3. Re:What a shame by Lurgen · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those nutters who taped every single Futurama episode that went to air in Australia.

      I actually plan on buying the DVD sets for Buffy when I next get some spare cash.

    4. Re:What a shame by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      How are the episodes edited? Are they edited for content or just so FX can squeeze four episodes into a 24-hour period (which they were doing in 2002, I believe).

      FX - as does most of the cable networks these days - edits the episodes to fit in an additional commercial break. They do this through a combination of edits throughout the episodes to create time for them to insert a break during the final act. Sometimes it's really noticable, sometimes less so. In all cases, it's frustrating and annoying, and makes me thankful for the recent TV-on-DVD trend (I already own seasons 1-3 of Buffy and season 1 of Angel).

    5. Re:What a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On some days, I did see 5-6 episodes of Buffy. It's flat _amazing_ how many inane statements Buffy makes that turn out to be foreshadowing some event several seasons later.

      Think about the day Buffy met Riley. She was buying schoolbooks and was going to send the bill to her mother. She said, "I hope it's a funny aneurysm." Then, a season later, Buffy's mom dies of an aneurysm. That sort of thing happens on a regular basis in the show.

      I rather believe it's done intentionally, although whether because of the Slayer's prophetic abilities or as just a sign of clever writing.

    6. Re:What a shame by Dr.+Jest · · Score: 1

      Actually, Sarah Michelle Gellar canned it. The fate of the series has been in question for months now because she was the only cast member who hadn't determined if she was coming back or not. It seems she sees more importance in Scooby Doo (in which no actor's career is furthered other than the ever-annoying Matthew Lillard).

      P.S.- I'm not sure, but I don't think she was directly involved in the Futurama decision. ;-)

    7. Re:What a shame by stanmann · · Score: 1

      How bout the dawn references as far back as season 1 and 2. There is some pretty clever stuff.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  15. On slashdot? by YahoKa · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok, is it just me or is buffy totally not a geek show. No geeks I know watch(ed) it, and I dont watch it. So what the hell is this doing on the geek site slashdot?

    Of course, i could be wrong... any geeks here watch it?

    1. Re:On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of geeks watch it. Hot chicks (one who is good with computers), evil nerds, lots of fantasy aspects, fairly complex storylines spanning many seasons, etc. It's perfect.

    2. Re:On slashdot? by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

      I love it when personal anecdote trump statistics.

      No geeks I know watch it.

      Therefore, buffy can't possibly be a geek show.

      Never mind the fact that the show's cancellation was posted to Slashdot.

    3. Re:On slashdot? by Khaed · · Score: 1

      Uh, hello. A Slashdot visitor submitted the story.
      A slashdot editor posted the story.
      Slashdot visitors are commenting. (Of course, we'd comment on just about anything...)
      It's kind of obvious some of us do.
      It isn't really a geeky show, despite the constant Google references Willow makes when she's using her computer, but that doesn't mean geeks don't watch it. But not all the shows I watch are "geek shows." Kind of stereotypical to think that everything we do is, well, geeky.

    4. Re:On slashdot? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Doesn't hold a candle to the star that is Star Trek Deep Space Nine.

      NOW THE FLAMING MAY BEGIN!

      (I'm on my period, that means I troll)

    5. Re:On slashdot? by Chundra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I've never seen this Buffy show displayed before, but I feel strongly that this is a travesty. It's utterly incomprehensible that those who dictated the cancellation are aware of the impact of this matter on the fanbase. As an open source advocate and member of the slashdot community, I believe we should establish some sort of online petition to opine our collective blather regarding this earth-shattering event. Unless we stand united against these evil corporate criminals we cannot win the war against Micro$oft and dominate the desktop marketshare. And really, that's all this ultimately boils down to--in a somewhat slightly overworded, padded, verbosely waffling, repetitive and redundant sense of that particular notion-- at least in the end...if you view it from a highly abstract perspective.

    6. Re:On slashdot? by bardencj · · Score: 1

      Dude, Buffy is totally a geek show. Haven't you ever seen Willow Teaches Java?!

    7. Re:On slashdot? by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Of course it's a geek show!

      There is no program on American prime-time TV that comes closer, in content or tone, to Japanese animation:

      A young school girl is a chosen warrior to fight vampires and demons. She has friends who use magic to help her. Comedy, melodrama, and action are freely mixed within almost every episode. Most of the stories are alegorical tales about growing up. There were even several cases of girls being attacked by tentacles, and Buffy was nearly raped by a disembodied demonic spirit two weeks ago, so you even have similarities to the Hentai stuff.

      How could there even be room to question it? Buffy, in essence, is live-action anime. What could possibly be geekier than that?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to suck the fetid, clotted chunks of blood out of your vagina, you skanky little bitch! I want to fuck the living arse off you and walk away with menstrual blood coating my balls and dripping down my legs.
      Please provide a phone number or other means of contacting you and let's set something up.

    9. Re:On slashdot? by thoth · · Score: 1

      I watch it.

      This show has heroes that are geeks - Willow and Giles. Willow is the computer wiz, Giles is the librarian. Many a show would have them off researching for info to pass to Buffy before fights.

      The show won some award from a Librarian Association for portraying librarians in such a positive way.

      Name me another show that has that!

    10. Re:On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent Point! I am a big Buffy and anime fan, and that is an observation I made myself to many friends. Of course my friends are fans of neither so the whole point was kind of lost on them.

    11. Re:On slashdot? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Taco likes it (as it appears do other members of staff). This site has always been about things that are important to those who run it. The site's popular, because those who read it tend to like the same things. Posting things the editors like seems to have been succesful.

      So, basically, it's here because the editor was interested in it..

      Oh, and I watch it, have the videos, and can go into too much detail about the plot.

  16. The way to continue.... by NA300ZX · · Score: 1

    Is to do a spin off with "Faith" Eliza Dushku's charachter. She will be coming back for the final 5 episodes, and its the perfect lead in. Josh Wheedon has been in talks with her from all accounts. I think with a edgier, sexier slayer a spin off could do quite well.

    Also, some one mentioned Farscape, now that show for my money has the best charachter and plot development in TV...it is a product of the late 90's 98/99 to be preceise...and its being canned by SCI-FI. Soon, there will truly be no good TV shows, just sitcoms and reality crap. Love live the history channel!

    1. Re:The way to continue.... by Snowspinner · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dushku is already committed to a pilot on a Fox show, making that unlikely.

    2. Re:The way to continue.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never saw an episode...

      However I do recognize Eliza Dushku's name and your idea is RIGHT. She is WWwwaaaayy hotter than that Sarah Gellar chick. Big nose. Cross Eyed. Mmmm.. Eliza....

    3. Re:The way to continue.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, Faith was *much* more sexy than Buffy. (I love those brunettes!) But hey, if they did some sort of spin-off series where Faith and Buffy do the "Willow thing" (hehe you know what I mean, boys), I will not protest.

    4. Re:The way to continue.... by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pilots on fox (and any other network) rarely work out. Hence, Firefly's cancellation.

  17. Joss Whedon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like these are bad times for Whedon, what with the canceling of Firefly too. It's a shame too, because he's got a lot of talent. Firefly had a really interesting storyline. The only problem I really had with it was the blue-gloved enemy. They were ill suited for the show.

  18. Vest Best by jayhawk88 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, I couldn't agree more. No show has done more for vest wearing in the past 50 years than Buffy the Vestpire..er, Vampire Slayer.

    1. Re:Vest Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeee myyyy Vest
      See my Vest
      It's a Real Vampire Chest

  19. call me a troll, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank god .. this show was schlock crap .. may i
    never have to deal with another alterno-fool
    goth wannabe that worships that garbage

  20. Angel Not Doing Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An average of 5 million viewers for season two isn't doing well?

    I personally enjoy Angel very much..

    1. Re:Angel Not Doing Well? by m1chael · · Score: 0

      i actually find angel a more interesting show, its not like buffy this buffy that... hey wait a sec...

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  21. cool by geeber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Huhhuh, Hey Beavis he said vest, huhuhhuh.

    Oh wait. That makes no sense. Terribly sorry.

  22. Maybe its just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe its just me, but I never found SMG all that hot. Then again, I'm not into blondes at all.

    1. Re:Maybe its just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever see any of her bad girl movies? She can turn it on for the camera, at least.

    2. Re:Maybe its just me by Tomble · · Score: 1

      It's not just you. Not that there's anything really wrong with her, she just doesn't do that much for me. Alyson Hannigan and Michelle Trachtenberg, OTOH...

      --
      Be careful! New moon tonight.
    3. Re:Maybe its just me by mlk · · Score: 1

      SMG?

      One word Willow
      Hmmm Willow...
      Hmmm...

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:Maybe its just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shes cute. But hot is going too far.

    5. Re:Maybe its just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then again, I'm not into blondes at all

      You Niggers are more "into" that sooty nigger wool sported by Queen Latifah and Oprah Winfrey.

    6. Re:Maybe its just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, she's not blonde. You might prefer Cruel Intentions (though I'd probably watch that for Reese Witherspoon, being into blondes ;).

  23. New show details... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    The new show will be about a midget vampire.

    Title: "Little Sucker"

    I know, I know...

  24. Ode to Buffy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Buffy comes
    and Buffy goes

    While wisps of auburn
    stirred from blows,

    fangs were flashed
    in shiny rows.

    Forever assigned
    to a daredevil task,

    Buffy now is free
    at last.

    Buffy comes
    and Buffy goes
    and Buffy
    and

  25. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People seriously watch this stuff and think it's good? My god, it's the laughing stock of all the people I know, geeks included.

    I don't mean to start a flame war, but what is it that people see in this show? I've watched it a few times and while it's good to sit down and go "duh" to, I can't imagine people caring it's ending?

    1. Re:What? by rowdent · · Score: 1

      I used to think Buffy was mindless tripe too, but then I started watching the second season DVDs at my part-time job and I was enthralled. The dialogue is so witty and ironic. The commentary on real-life problems is well done especially because the show deals with the supernatural. It is the subtle balance between the real and unreal that gives this show its appeal. And for those people who believe that Buffy is not a geeky enough show, could you please tell me another american syndicated television series that makes reference to Dr. Who?

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea I guess you have a point (this is the same AC as above)

      There isn't much other crap on TV worth watching... Which is a shame.

      www.nologo.org

      Beer!

  26. Gellar's Movie Career by Snowspinner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope Gellar's salary for seven years of Buffy was pretty good, because, truth be told, I can't see her movie career lasting her very long. I mean, crossing over to a movie career from TV is hard enough as it is. Doing it when, frankly, one of your main assets is that you're young and sexy just doesn't seem like a long-term career move. It's not as though she isn't already typecast. And I just can't see her movie career hitting it in the handful of years she has left as a really bankable star. Quite frankly, I think she'd have made more money with two or three more seasons of Buffy. Then again, one doesn't have to read too many interviews with her to get the idea that she's not the brightest crayon in the box.

    1. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She did quite well as an actress in Cruel Intentions.

    2. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by silne · · Score: 1

      I heard that she actually wants to settle down and have kids and be a mother instead of being a 'star'. She didn't have much of a childhood having grown up in hollywood, so I think she's pining for the traditional roles as wife and mother. I don't blame her, well except that Freddie is a putz and she could've done better.

    3. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by Dr.+Jest · · Score: 1

      I'd like to second the vote on Prinze's putziness. What was she thinking?

    4. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Just wait for that blockbuster with her co-star David Duchovny.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    5. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No she didn't.

    6. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

      She'll make a great Vivid girl.

      --
      word.
    7. Re:Gellar's Movie Career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes she did

  27. Perspective by KFury · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only reason the show is going to be 'respun' after Sarah leaves is because she's the title character and a Buffyless Buffy has to be called something else.

    Sarah's leaving, it doesn't mean the franchise is closing down, though it's hardly surprising that she'd want to spin it that way.

    Me, I'm secretly hoping for a crossover spinoff from Buffy and Enterprise, where a new slayer named Gargravarr rises up in The Fray's post-slayer universe, and travels by starship from world to world to (and this part's key) alphabetically insult, and then slay, every demon in the known universe.

    Things get interesting in the series's two-hour pilot (which happens to also be it's season finale) when she crosses paths with, and consequently teams up with, Malcolm Reynolds and crew. The finale (aired in week two) centers around a final confrontation with the Big Bad: the mysterious yet ugly Reavers.

    If only TiVo made new shows based on the ones I like...

    1. Re:Perspective by Zelet · · Score: 1

      I would watch that.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    2. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not 'Sarah', it's 'SMG'. Everybody knows that!

    3. Re:Perspective by kinnell · · Score: 1
      The only reason the show is going to be 'respun' after Sarah leaves is because she's the title character and a Buffyless Buffy has to be called something else.

      Why can't buffy have her face eaten off by some evil undead creatures, and have to go to a plastic surgery clinic. In the meantime, they could hold auditions for the next series. They could eat her throat too, requiring extensive reconstructive surgery of her voice box. And while she's in plastic surgery anyway, she may as well get her breasts enlarged.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    4. Re:Perspective by cushty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only reason the show is going to be 'respun' after Sarah leaves is because she's the title character and a Buffyless Buffy has to be called something else.

      I beg to differ: take the long running (since 1983) UK Glaswegian TV Policeman show 'Taggart'. Mark McManus, the actor who played the lead character Jim Taggart died in 1994, and yet the series continues to this day with the name 'Taggart' and nobody playing Jim Taggart.
    5. Re:Perspective by fermion · · Score: 1
      Which I why I don't understand why this is of any interest at all. SMG has been threatening to leave ever since the series moved to UPN. She has professional but not passionate in her acting for the past three seasons. The loss Head messed up the dynamics even more. The show has obviously been trying to figure out how to stay relevant and continue without SMG, first with Dawn and now the slayer zoo, but with no success. Obviously without Buffy there is no show.

      I find the interesting question is if we can have a successful spin-off. To me this is not a question of the quality of the show, but whether the networks want a show. Think about it. Would angel have survived in this world of reality tv. Firefly was not so bad, but networks are increasingly centering their programming around unscripted shows or simple narritives like 'Law and Order', the CSI fungus, and to a lesser extent 'The Practice' and the revived 'Dragnet'.

      So you are correct, and it is not so outlandish. We may well get a show where Willow and Xander read the newspaper and search for vampires. After all, we have shows where miracles are reality.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Perspective by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not 'Sarah', it's 'SMG'. Everybody knows that!
      SubMachineGun?

    7. Re:Perspective by sharkey · · Score: 1
      where a new slayer named Gargravarr rises up

      Seems like it would have limited appeal:
      "Here, vampire, follow my humming to the Total Perspective Vortex."
      How many undead will fall for THAT each week?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:Perspective by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The only reason the show is going to be 'respun' after Sarah leaves is because she's the title character and a Buffyless Buffy has to be called something else.

      What about Blake's 7? There were only 7 of them for a few episodes, and they killed Blake off after season 2.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have it on good authority the main character will be re-cast as ganster rapper named "Puffy".

    10. Re:Perspective by mcglk · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, but that's the UK. They tend to hang on to a lot of things by name long after the original meaning has been lost---"royal family," "British Empire" . . .

    11. Re:Perspective by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Faith (Eliza Dushku) is rumoured to be the Slayer replacement for the spinoff.

    12. Re:Perspective by wednesdaywar · · Score: 1

      This is a rumor at best... from Zap2it.com "Rumors of a possible spin-off still run rampant, although the most likely candidate -- based on the character of Buffy's fellow slayer Faith -- now seems iffy at best since actress Eliza Dushku (who plays the recurring role on both "Buffy" and "Angel") has signed on for the FOX drama pilot "Heroine" about a young woman who finds that she can go back in time and relive single days."

    13. Re:Perspective by KILNA · · Score: 1

      "Sliders" much? We ALL know how that turned out.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    14. Re:Perspective by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Agh. "Quantum Leap for Sensitive Types".

    15. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plastic surgery for character replacement thing is a pretty sure sign of jumping the shark. This demonstrates that Knight Rider jumped the shark in the very first episode. Not that you needed proof.

      Of course, it worked fine in Doctor Who, and in Lexx...oh well, nice theory for a minute there.

    16. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh...I dunno if you noticed, but Quantum Leap was Quantum Leap for sensitive types. Not that I didn't like it, but it was touchy-feely as all get out.

    17. Re:Perspective by geekoid · · Score: 1

      why couldn't they kill her off and 'train' a new buffy?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. More successful? by EverDense · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It however points to the fact that a spin-off will emerge, hopefully one that is more successful than Angel."

    More "successful" does not mean "better".
    Hell, Survivor was a "sucessful" show, but it was basically mindless voyeurism.

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
    1. Re:More successful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, Survivor was a "sucessful" show, but it was basically mindless voyeurism.

      Survivor is about human interaction, about communication and cooperation, about power politics, about PEOPLE. If when you watch survivor you only see "mindless" talk and people wearing skimpy outfits, then that's a shortcoming on your part. not Survivor's

    2. Re:More successful? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      More "successful" does not mean "better".

      Often, it does.

      "Survivor" was an exception, based on the "it's real!" shtick.

      Considering that I can't even FIND Angel, I'll be happy with whatever happens--just as long as it's in a predictable time slot.

    3. Re:More successful? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Considering that I can't even FIND Angel, I'll be happy with whatever happens--just as long as it's in a predictable time slot.
      I don't think your inability to read a TV Guide has any bearing on the quality and/or success of a TV show.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    4. Re:More successful? by allism · · Score: 1

      Survivor is about attracting viewers who have no real intimacy in their lives to watch a show where they can pretend to have some level of intimacy with something or someone. It's all about voyeurism and a way to get something that they don't have without having to take the risks that people with healthy, emotionally available psyches take to form lasting bonds with real human beings.

      Kinda like bonding with a computer game instead of going out and getting a real girlfriend...

    5. Re:More successful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, kind of like slashdot. Think about it.

    6. Re:More successful? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if anyone was going to pick up on the Angel reference. I've never really seen it much myself -- it was on satellite TV way before terrestrial, and I only have the latter -- but here in the UK, several of my friends (and we're a load of Buffy fans) rate the first few series of Angel higher than the last few of BTVS.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:More successful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY!!!!! no 'kinda like', let's not mince words here!

    8. Re:More successful? by tpv · · Score: 1
      I'd pick Angel of BTVS anyday. (Except Monday, which is when BTVS is on, and Angel isn't..., but anyways)

      Angel dark, it has ongoing story lines, and a little thing called "direction".

      Buffy has gone of for so many series that Joss doesn't know what to do with it anymore.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
  29. It is not so over... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    ... will be back from the dead

  30. Quite wrong, actually by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Me and the wife are geeks. We've watched it for years. It was/is a great show. Funny, interesting, clever. If it had been anything but vampire slaying, SMG and AH would have been nominated for Emmys years ago.(They wouldn't have won because of their age, but they'd have been nominated.)

    I even bought the cast album of "Once More, With Feeling", the musical episode.

    Now if Joss can convince ED to spin off ... Yeah!

  31. How about Willow? by j.e.hahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd watch a show based on Willow. She's far and away my favorite character (since way before she was a beautiful lesbian uber witch) In fact, if the show really is over she's the only reason I'll watch a new spin off.

    If it doesn't have willow, it isn't worth watching. (And god damn it, they need Giles.)

    1. Re:How about Willow? by Artifex · · Score: 1
      I'd watch a show based on Willow. She's far and away my favorite character (since way before she was a beautiful lesbian uber witch) In fact, if the show really is over she's the only reason I'll watch a new spin off.


      Only if it started in the summertime...

      "This one time, at band camp?"
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    2. Re:How about Willow? by bnenning · · Score: 1
      If it doesn't have willow, it isn't worth watching. (And god damn it, they need Giles.)


      Yes and yes. She's easily the best character, it's close between Giles and Anya for second (you just can't beat the Dance of Capitalist Superiority).

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:How about Willow? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      I've heard rumors that Joss is working on a spinoff based on Giles called "the ripper" I don't know much more about it, unfortunatly.

    4. Re:How about Willow? by Piquan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ripper was put on hold indefinitely some time ago. A lot of us thought it dead, but it's mostly on hold from what I can tell. Here's something I sent to some friends a while ago:

      Regarding the series "Ripper", exploring Giles's past:

      It's not dead yet. I found this on the BBC website:

      Buffy News 05 August 2002
      Head talks film/Ripper

      The Scooby Gang prepare to sing Tony Head has revealed yet more on the future of Buffy and Ripper.

      "Joss wants to make a movie," Tony told the ET Online website. "I'd love to make a movie. I don't think Sarah does at the moment, but who knows what is going to happen in two years' time. Joss' imagination is so wild, fertile and unstoppable, you know whatever it is going to be is cool."

      As for Ripper, Tony suspects it won't now be happening until at least 2003.

      "[It's] somewhere down the line. Joss really wants to do it. Jane Espenson has already written one script, and they are talking about putting six scripts together. [With Firefly, Joss] has quite a bit on his plate right now. It suits me because I have a fair amount on mine. I think possibly [it will happen] sometime next year."

      To get something more recent, say, 18 November, from Zap2It:

      "It's still there, it hasn't gone away... I had lunch with [BBC2 head] Jane Root just before I came back. [I]... couldn't resist the opportunity to say, had she heard anything about 'Ripper' and what were her feelings.

      "She said she basically knew as much as I did, which was that Joss is just up against it. With these three balls up in the air [Buffy, Angel and Firefly], there's absolutely no point in throwing another one up there. I guess one would fall, and there's no need for that.

      "Ultimately, along the line, everything can find its place and its time and succeed. Jane thinks we're still going to do it. I haven't even bothered to talk to Joss about it. The last he said, he really wants to do it. He's got three or four scripts he's got in progress with Jane Espenson."

      I guess I'm jonesing for more Joss these days.

    5. Re:How about Willow? by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      Intersting, you pick Willow. I'd add Giles (like you ) and Spike. In other words one strength of the show partly was that the rest of the cast were actual characters in their own right (like Seinfeld I gueess) rather than just patsys for the lead to bounce witty remarks off.

    6. Re:How about Willow? by moirafey · · Score: 1

      Well, I've got a friend in England watching out for it, who has agreed to send tapes over (which we'll have to get transferred to VHS, but oh, darn.) So far, no more has been said officially, but there was an interview with Tony Head in a recent issue of the BtVS magazine, when he discussed it. Pretty much, everyone wants to do it, but as has been mentioned, there's no time right now. He did, however, hint that it may involve Giles being a ghost hunter... He's trying to get them to set it in the area where he actually lives, which is rich in ghost lore; I think that would be fantastic; different enough from Buffy that it wouldn't get stale, but well within the talents of the writers and directors.

      --
      "It comes in PINTS???"
    7. Re:How about Willow? by jafac · · Score: 1

      How about; "Bored Now" Willow?

      Mmmmmm- puppy. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  32. Can't win for losing by Nemus · · Score: 1
    Just got hold of the first season for this, as well as Farscape, and now that I'm starting to really get into them (believe it or not,ye doubters, Buffy is actually a very decent show), they go and @#$@#$@! cancel them. Argh, i say, ARGH!

    As long as they don't cancel Toonami, I should be able to keep from going on a killing spree. But if that puppy goes......Hulk Smash!!!!!

    --
    Mod Points: Helping you keep your opinion to yourself.
    1. Re:Can't win for losing by m1chael · · Score: 1, Funny

      buffy has been around for years. there have been, what, about 7 seasons of the thing and now youre complaining its being cancelled? youve only started season 1 so there are plenty of episodes left for your viewing pleasure. as each season goes by you can see buffy getting thinner and thinner, no wonder they had to end it or it would be too late!

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  33. in other news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tuxxy the BSD Slayer...."

  34. Half Life of television shows by snitty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be interesting to do a study on how long shows last. I can guarantee that some shows aren't terminated based on falling ratings, but rather the actors stopping (Seinfeld, ST:TNG, Buffy?) While some shows seem to keep on going, like the day time dramas. Is the length of time a good show is on inversely proportional to the ratings? Does the same hold for game shows like Price is Right, or Family Feud?

    --
    Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    1. Re:Half Life of television shows by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee that some shows aren't terminated based on falling ratings, but rather the actors stopping (Seinfeld, ST:TNG, Buffy?)

      ST:TNG was NOT terminated because of the actors stopping. Rick Berman, et al wanted to capitalize on the show's success to spin off a bunch of money-making movies.

      You can see how this has become a miserable failure in ST: Nemesis as all starships now fly around like TIE Fighters (Star Wars) and all of the crew's hand weapons shoot pulses of energy (Star Wars) instead of beams.

    2. Re:Half Life of television shows by gcrisp · · Score: 1

      Not quite what you're looking for, but I thought Jump The Shark would be relevant here.

    3. Re:Half Life of television shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A HalfLife TV show! Now there's one I'd watch. The franchise possibilities are endless:

      - Counterstrike, the story of the brave, PCP-fueled men and women of a secretive anti-terrorist organization
      - Day of Defense, a quasi documentary of the war on Nazi Germany, each battled repeated at nauseum for different perspectives
      - Action HL, starring Chow Yun fat of course

      Time to by that satellite dish!

  35. Angel Rules by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Angel is a great show that really came into its own once BTVS moved to UPN. Its probably not doing well because the WB doesn't advertise it(alla firefly) and no one knows when its on, or it gets bumped for crap like tonight(the lone ranger). But IMO Charisma Carpenter is way hotter than SMG. I've caught the last few episodes only because someone on /. said it wasn't canned after i made some comment about great shows like firefly, farscape and angel gettign canned. I really thought it was gone. As for Buffy, its jumped the shark, this whole training school for potential slayers just bugs me, but the past few seasons, Glorie, ADAM, have been great, I'm sad to see it go.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Angel Rules by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Agreed on all counts, except that IMO this season of Buffy is significantly better than the last. Some of the stuff with the potential slayers is a bit silly, but I like the arc of a final confrontation between the Scoobies and the First.


      I would also be remiss if I didn't mention that Stephanie Romanov is right up there with Charisma. (Okay, so she's evil and wants to enslave the world to her demon masters, but who's perfect?)

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:Angel Rules by EricTheMad · · Score: 1

      I would also be remiss if I didn't mention that Stephanie Romanov [populli.net] is right up there with Charisma. (Okay, so she's evil and wants to enslave the world to her demon masters, but who's perfect?)

      She's also dead as of the last episode.

      --
      -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --
    3. Re:Angel Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hello??? You must not be a regular watcher of Buffy or Angel.

      Just because someone's been stabbed nastily on these shows does not necessarily mean they are dead (as a human) yet.

      You'll have to see next week what the official outcome is. Cordelia could eventually become good or come back and restore Wess's toy...

    4. Re:Angel Rules by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just because someone's been stabbed nastily on these shows does not necessarily mean they are dead (as a human) yet.


      And just because someone's dead doesn't mean they stay that way. I wouldn't be surprised if sufficiently high-ranking Wolfram & Hart employees get special "life insurance" benefits.


      Cordelia could eventually become good or come back and restore Wess's toy


      Heh, I always thought he was her toy.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    5. Re:Angel Rules by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Alyson Hannigan, Emma Caulfield, Elizabeth Anne Allen (Amy the witch), and Charisma Carpenter ...all hotter than SMG. (IMHO)

      However, none of them are anywhere near as talented.

    6. Re:Angel Rules by smartin · · Score: 1

      But IMO Charisma Carpenter [fhm.com] is way hotter than SMG.

      Maybe she was, but she frumpted out big time once she cut her hair.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    7. Re:Angel Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charisma Carpenter has 'frumped out' cause she's PREGNANT, dipshit.

      Compare her face now to a few seasons ago - she's added quite a bit of weight.

    8. Re:Angel Rules by ajs · · Score: 1

      Angel deserves poor ratings this season. Not because it's poorly written (far from it!) or acted (some good some bad, just like Buffy), but because the air-heads at the network decided to put it up against the best written show on television (IMHO), The West Wing. I know for a fact that I'm not the only person who likes both shows.

      I have a TiVo, so I set up the West Wing to record only new episodes and Angel to record all showings. Hopefully they'll get smart and re-run the entire season before the next one starts....

    9. Re:Angel Rules by Peale · · Score: 1

      My God...thank you for that link.

    10. Re:Angel Rules by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      My problem with Angel is that I'm currently hating all of the characters (except for Lorne). It makes the show painful to watch.

    11. Re:Angel Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's pregnant you dolts.

    12. Re:Angel Rules by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      What I can't gather with Angel and BtVS is why there are not any real tie-ins. I mean this season the world is close to ending and Angel is doing is own little thing.

    13. Re:Angel Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had wondered about that...I am glad to see she's not just porking out.

    14. Re:Angel Rules by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


      But IMO Charisma Carpenter [fhm.com] is way hotter than SMG.

      Maybe she was, but she frumpted out big time once she cut her hair.

      That's because she's pregnant.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  36. They can keep going, easy... by Colitis · · Score: 1

    After all, for half its run Blake's 7 had no Blake in it... ;)

    1. Re:They can keep going, easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until right at the end, and what an end! I'll have to rent that.. once I can afford a TV and DVD player :)

    2. Re:They can keep going, easy... by plugger · · Score: 1

      Keep an eye on alt.binaries.drwho, the entire series gets posted about twice a year.

  37. I'm a "switcher". by bdrago · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I mocked BtVS (and the fans) for years - partially because of the show, plus some misplaced derision of the pseudo-Goths I knew from high school and college.

    Then FX started showing all the episodes in order - two a day. Let's just say "thank God for Tivo."

    About three months later I'd seen almost every episode from the first five seasons. And I loved it. The writing was often excellent, and the casting was perfect. The first three seasons did a great job capturing the real essence of high school, instead of the Utopia often portrayed in network shows about those awkward years.

    It's certainly not perfect, but even the worst episodes were often way above average, which is more than we can expect from the boob tube these days. And when BtVS was at its best, it held it's own with anything on TV - Buffy was nominated for an Emmy for Best Writing in a Drama, and the other nominees were two episodes each of "West Wing" and "The Sopranos". Not too shabby.

    Anyway - before you make fun of it too much, it's worth checking. I'm pretty sure FX is still rerunning the series in order. It's definately worth waiting to start with the first season, as the show has a great mythos that later episodes rely on.

    1. Re:I'm a "switcher". by silne · · Score: 1

      The first episode I saw was season 4's "Hush". I recommend this to all the nay-sayers. Won an award (golden globe or something), and well deserved too.

    2. Re:I'm a "switcher". by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Informative

      How many people has this happened to? Goes to show that marketing really fucked up with this one, though I'm not quite sure how...I have respect for this show too, after having been forced to watch it many times with my wife and her sister. The same does not go for Xena, which I have been forced to endure in the same circumstance...I absolutely loathe that show - take everything that is wrong with shows that portray the dominant smart man stereotype who saves the weak dumb woman stereotype, flip it, make everybody lesbians, and you have Xena. I think it's because from the ads, Buffy wasn't any different from Xena to me and others...just some run-of-the-mill action show with a female lead. This is so far from the truth, it's not even funny. However, the first episode you watch isn't enough, as Buffy the character doesn't become interesting until you get a handle for the interactions with the other characters (both male and female, with strengths and weaknesses in different areas). I think the turning point for Buffy with me was last season's finale with Willow unearthing the Satanic temple en route to destroying the world. That was really really cool.

      But I digress. Another good and interesting show goes off the air. I might as well unplug the coax when the Simpsons depart.

      Chris

    3. Re:I'm a "switcher". by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      That's what happened to me, too. Always mocked the show (like many others) thinking it was brainless and just as dopey as the movie.

      A friend was watching an FX marathon a year ago, and I literally bought TiVo just so i could see the entire series in three months. I cannot think of any other show in television history that has had as many long-running plotlines/characters and subtle long-term foreshadowing.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes. This episode was actually a little scary. It would've been more scary if UPN hadn't dropped video for the first minute or two of the show (a minute is an eternity) only to regain video, then lose fucking _audio_ until practically the end of the show. Talk about irony.

    5. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, I am EXACTLY like you. My girlfriend loved Buffy and I just thought it looked stupid. And then FX ran their Buffy 24hr marathon around 1.5 years ago, and I couldn't stop watching it. I was hooked. Then, they started playing it twice a day, from 6pm until 8pm, and I was hooked beyond belief. I didn't have Tivo, so I missed some episodes, but I'd say that in the span of around 5 months I saw a good portion of the entire run.

      I bought the first 3 seasons on DVD, and they are the treasures of my DVD collection.

      It truly is the best show on TV. It never takes itself seriously (last week's episode, SMG said something to the effect of "Yes, the Hellmouth seems to open up around May for some reason", ie. end of the TV season). It is hella funny, awesome snippy dialogue, and the characters are great.

      The first 3 seasons had NO bad episodes, and I'll admit that the season finale for season two had me wispy-eyed. Plus, SMG looked hot when she was 18 and wearing those mini-skirts with boots (she really does look too old and skinny these days) and Faith was also a hot, hot slut, I love her.

    6. Re:I'm a "switcher". by will_die · · Score: 1

      Just don't watch the shows after she is killed, it really goes down hill.

    7. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first 3 seasons had NO bad episodes

      Er, well, let's not exaggerate. The seasons are often slow starters. When She Was Bad and Inca Mummy Girl are particularly weak. Dead Man's Party, Reptile Boy, and Homecoming aren't far behind. And Go Fish was definitely filler. Probably the worst season start was The Freshman, though (and Beer Bad just might be the Worst Episode Ever). But you did say 3 seasons. ;)

    8. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Bodrius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm... I partially agree with you. I liked the show from the start, but I also mocked the show frequently, and particularly some of the misplaced fans who took it far more seriously than the show took itself. Sometimes good-heartedly, sometimes not so.

      The thing is I think both the publicity and the more vocal fans gave the wrong impression of the show to typical viewers.

      The publicity made it seem like the "next big thing in fantasy/B-movie-inspired/overambitious-cheap-sci-f i in the age of Hercules and Xena".

      This was the wrong approach. Buffy is proudly B-moveish, but eminently aware of its B-movieshness and is covered by a deep layer of irony and sarcasm. The characters were just as aware of the absurdities as the viewer, and dealt with it with a mixture of cynicism and naivete that resonated with the intended demographic.

      It's not the high-production values that redeemed it (just like it never redeemed Xena et al), it's the fact these enrich the irony.

      The fans could usually be classified in:

      A) 'Hardcore geek fanboys/girls', with pseudo-Goth (and if you think Buffy is goth, the pseudo is necessary), comic-book-or-Trekkie-style, and OMG-characterX-is-so-hot-let's-write-erotica-on-us enet subgroups.
      These people took it so seriously that other people thought the series took itself just as seriously.
      B) Teen-drama geeks.
      These people made such a big deal of the indicental dramatic plots (that any show with character development is bound to have) that it seemed like Dawson's Creek with demons and vampires.

      Perhaps I'm biased because I saw the original movie. Yes, it was bad. Really bad. And it knew it was bad, and strecthed its B-movie-crappiness-in-joke just a bit too far.

      But it set the tone for the series, which did a much better job at telling the same joke.

      It's a story of a typical TEEN CHEERLEADER VAMPIRE SLAYER, for Christ sake. And she's named BUFFY!

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    9. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      About three months later I'd seen almost every episode from the first five seasons.
      Boy are you in for a nasty surprise. The sixth season sucks hugely, and the seventh has been even worse (though it's not over so I guess I can't judge it yet).

      Buffy went from a two-thumb-up show on my Tivo in the early seasons, to a one-thumb-down in season 7. It's really that bad. :(

    10. Re:I'm a "switcher". by samael · · Score: 1

      Which time?

    11. Re:I'm a "switcher". by will_die · · Score: 1

      At the end of season 5.
      Maybe the detractors of the show are right. When you have to ask which time the heroine of the show is killed, something may be wrong. :)

    12. Re:I'm a "switcher". by samael · · Score: 1

      Well she dies at the end of season 1 for a few minutes.

      And I liked most of season 6. There's a few duff episodes, but overall I was rather fond.

    13. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am exactly like you. i was working as a developer at the time and a co-worker (single father of one) kept rattling on about the latest buffy episode. this was circa 1997 so we must be talking about season 1. i laughed at him, though not maliciously. it just seemed too idiotic to take seriously. i was 27 at the time.

      fast forward to about a year ago. now i'm 31 and have turned into a total buffy junkie courtesy of FX. yeah they have some hotties on the show. but more importantly this thing has style, wit and more substance and cohesion than anything i've seen since ST:TNG (and i watched TNG growing up, not in re-runs so this is a few years ago).

      the moment xander refered to one of glories' minions as a "hobbit with leperosy" i knew this was something special. or at least different.

    14. Re:I'm a "switcher". by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      "It's a story of a typical TEEN CHEERLEADER VAMPIRE SLAYER, for Christ sake. And she's named BUFFY!"

      It's a great show endowed with a silly name. But that's kinda the point.

      The whole theme of the show is false expectations. Whedon has stated the original concept for the show was a cute blonde valley girl walking down a dark alley, and getting jumped by a vampire, exactly like countless horror movie cliches. HOWEVER, she doesn't scream, run, fall, and get savaged. Nope, she stays. And not only does she stand her ground, she kicks its ASS. This is Buffy.

      This kind of sucker punch is Buffy's bread and butter. Leading the audience's expectations in one direction and then pulling the rug out. In fact it's gotten almost predictably unpredictable. Example: ****EARLY SEASON SEVEN SPOILER WARNING**** In that episode where the watcher's council gets blown up, as soon as that guy (Quentin?) started that heroic, hope filled, noble speech, I knew they were all dead. Five seconds later, BOOM!

      I love the show, but I am glad it is ending. It has run a good course, and season 7 looks to be setting up for the mother of all finales. Go out with a bang, Buffy, we'll miss ya.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    15. Re:I'm a "switcher". by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ". The writing was often excellent, and the casting was perfect"

      Mod this guy up +1 funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Bicoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    The worst thing about recent vampire movies/TV shows, and books (basically since Anne Rice) is that they have this tendancy to turn what used to be undead badass demons into angsty wimps. If I see another angsty vampire, I swear, I'm going to scream.

    --
    If not all sentients are human, couldn't it be possible that not all humans are sentient either?
    1. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by rottcodd · · Score: 1

      Well, *most* of the vampires on the shows are pretty evil. Angel has a special exemption (he's been cursed with humanity). I think transforming Spike into touchy-feely Spike was a little... irritating? His character worked well when he was bad. I haven't read any Anne Rice books, and my vampire movie experience is limited to the Nosferatus and Love At First Bite, so I can't comment there.

      BTW, the Angel "excuse" resulted in some very good storylines.

    2. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Bluetick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buffy is primarily camp. It pokes fun at itself, and is always keenly aware of it's deficiencies and detachment from reality. Something that's been missing from sci-fi since the original Star Trek and Batman series. If you think they're just a bunch of Gen X, whiners, you're missing the point.

    3. Re: Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > If I see another angsty vampire, I swear, I'm going to scream.

      I scream for any kind of vampire I see.

      But yes, I much preferred the Saberhagen style vampires, handsome debonair fellows all, rather than the bad 80's horror film outtakes that look like they merely need to visit a dentist, a dermatologist, and a rage counsellor.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by SetarconeX · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I really tried to like Buffy. Every season or so, I'd watch an episode or two, just because I knew plenty of people who swore by it, and it never really rubbed off.

      But it wasn't the angst. In fact, it was more the lack of angst. Anne Rice books, though they kinda wear on you after the first half dozen or so, at least have some amount of feeling. At least with angsty books, there has to be a bit of introspection in the characters. A certain amount of emotional depth which is inherent in the plotline.

      The vampires in Buffy, however, always fell into two types. There were the "funny vampires," and the "really angry evil vampires." It seemed the basic episode tended to degenerate into "vampire mastermind has plan, tells inept-yet-funny henchmen to carry it out, day is saved by meddling kids." In effect, it was like watching those old Scooby Doo cartoons.

      Now, don't get me wrong. I kinda like those old Scooby Doo cartoons. It's mindless entertainment. I can see where other people might like Buffy, I just never understood why they needed 7 years of it. Whatever floats your boat, I guess.

      Just my 2c.

      --
      "Isn't that the sweetest little well-balanced undergraduate-level philosophy of life."
    5. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure which episodes you watched... but one of the biggest vampires storyline-wise in the first 3 seasons, Angel, really didn't fit into either type. Anyway, the past few seasons have had relatively little vampiric activity. Buffy's been busy battling a hellgod, some evil nerds, and her best friend.

    6. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by amnesty · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But it wasn't the angst. In fact, it was more the lack of angst. Anne Rice books, though they kinda wear on you after the first half dozen or so, at least have some amount of feeling. At least with angsty books, there has to be a bit of introspection in the characters. A certain amount of emotional depth which is inherent in the plotline.


      That kinda strikes me as funny, because I always thought that that was the key to Buffy. It's all about the emotion, and does stray on the side of being too angsty at times (which is why last season was so unpopular).

      Honestly, these character never get a break. They often lose, and lose hard. I'd love to see a 'meddling kids save the day episode' once in a while because sometimes I think the show is way too depressing.

      Buffy dies. Buffy's mom dies. Xander leaves Anya at the altar. Angel becomes evil. Tara is killed, and Willow becomes evil seeking revenge.

      If that all sounded really cheesy or melodramatic, realize that we're talking about seven years of plot twists. I guess I can't really express it without it sounding stupid, but it's almost the mission statement that the characters can never be happy.

      Kinda reminds me of Party of Five.
    7. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by amnesty · · Score: 1

      This is probably because angsty wimps are more interesting.

      Badass demon. I mean, those two words have told the entire story. Demon is gonna come and try to kick your ass. The good guys have to kill it. Badass demon probably will taunt them before dying at the hero's hands.

      Anyway, Angel isn't angsty. He's brooding. He's not depressed all the time. He's a badass when he needs to be, he's kind to people when he needs to be, his character is a bit deeper than either demon you mention.

    8. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by malex23 · · Score: 1
      I have to say, I really tried to like Buffy. Every season or so, I'd watch an episode or two, just because I knew plenty of people who swore by it, and it never really rubbed off.

      Alot of people have that reaction, particularly after the first few seasons. The important thing to understand is that Buffy really doesn't lend itself to occasional viewings. The are simply too many references and in-jokes pertaining to the characters' "histories" and the relationships are very dynamic (if I might crack open my dusty English Lit vocabulary.)

      My sincere advice to you, and any other Slaya-haters still reading, is to beg, borrow, or violate-the-copyright-of the first season DVDs. If you can watch the first few episodes and not care obsessively about the characters, then fine, move on with your life. But I was just breaking in a new girlfriend with that disk, and she ended up watching the whole season in one sitting. Now I'm afraid she'll leave me for Alyson Hannigan.

    9. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by shadowbearer · · Score: 1



      Calling Buffy "scifi" is like calling Hammer's Slammers Fantasy writing.

      It's a whole different genre, dude.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I usually don't go for vampire stuff and horror in general because they generally take laughable stuff too seriously. At least the Buffy show made some fun of it.

    11. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Anne Rice vampire novels start out good, then get better and even better, and then begin to really suck (no pun).

      Read up to but not including "Tale of the Body Thief." Once you read that you may have to spit at how gay and weepy it gets.

    12. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of Party of Five.

      I used to love that show, but it was really hard to watch. I'd think, "Jesus, cut these kids some slack already."

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    13. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      My old roommate quoted two rules of Buffy to me one day, and they seem to hold true.

      1) Sex is bad.
      2) Relationships end, and always as badly as possible.

      If characters have sex you can be sure one of them is dead or leaving Sunnydale sometime in the near future.
      If someone is happy in love, watch out for negative karma coming back to bite you in the ass. :)

      Half the fun is just trying to figure out exactly HOW the non-Scooby character is going to meet their end ;)

    14. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by stanmann · · Score: 1

      You just made me realize why party of five, and seventh heaven sucked after 3-5 seasons. They tried to follow every character in every episode, after they moved out, and kept adding characters. BtVS beats that by killing off characters. Love it.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    15. Re:Buffy and the Angsty Vampire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true of nearly any show on broadcast TV, especially if it airs before 10 pm. It's almost impossible to get a show aired otherwise. Part of the coolness of Buffy is the way Whedon & co. played with that, working around it in cool and innovative ways (the magic-sex metaphor with Willow and Tara being the most obvious example). The Hayes code still has reach, unfortunately, even if it's not official any more. One of the ways you can see TV gradually changing is that writers are becoming able to depict real human relationships without these sorts of artificial constraints. But it's also true that beatific happiness becomes boring, of course - strife keeps us coming back.

      A related issue is the kickbacks to networks from the US Drug Czar's Office for anti-drug plots. The lame, blunt magic=drugs plot from season six may be attributable to that (though BtVS had been a notable holdout against those rewrites for years). It was a shame because there was a much better drugs vs. reality plot available in Buffy's return from Nirvana/Heaven/Whatever, but they pretty much threw that opportunity away (it would have been way too abstract to satisfy the ONDCP, ie. not worth any kickbacks to the network, so it may have been pressure from above).

      You'd be amazed how much of the TV you see is being rewritten by puritan politics. BtVS and Angel actually do much, much better in that respect than most shows.

      There's a good article on anti-drug plots and the ONDCP in Salon from a few years ago. Search for it while you still can...

  39. DIE BUFFY DIE! by strredwolf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh $DEITY, thank you for slaying Buffy off of the TV. The IQ rating of every viewer will sharply increase. Just the whole premise of the show is a turn-off for me.

    Why do so many folks watch it? The boobs?

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does this get rated as "Insightful"? Seems like Flamebait to me.

    2. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how Dude! I'm a Celebrity Survivor dating Joe Millionaire as an alternative viewing is going to increase the IQ of the viewing nation.

      American prime time TV is a barrel of monkey shit, and you know it.

    3. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Why do so many folks watch it? The boobs?

      If you can't tell the difference between Buffy and VIP then you clearly deserve all the crap TV that UPN will surely replace Buffy with.

      Buffy has been responsible for some of the most imaginative and challenging episodes of TV in recent years. The fact that they can do this in a show that clearly has a ridiculous premise is just testimony to how good the show really is.

    4. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Dr.+Jest · · Score: 1

      Interesting take on the subject. Have you actually watched enough to make a decision based on the content and not the premise? Because the big appeal of the show is that it's such an intelligent and well-developed treatment of what really does seem to be kind of a dumb premise. And who modded that up as "insightful" anyway?

    5. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by amnesty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's a bit harsh.

      I would argue that it's one of the more intelligent shows on television. Buffy has always gotten a bad reputation for its name. It even turned me off from watching it.

      But when I sat down and watched a few, it was surprising how dramatic the show was. The key to the show is that there's a real human element to it. The characters are played as real people despite the fantasy situation, which is incredibly rare and refreshing. How many times in mass media have you seen fantasy and sci-fi characters played out as flat caracatures? Sci-fi is often too obsessed with the technological and short changes interesting characterizations. No, this show is great because it is about people. It uses the fantasy element to put them in extraordinary situations.

      Take Buffy's death. She died at the end of season five, and her friends were horrified. At the beginning of the next season, her friends had found a spell to bring her back, to save her from whatever unspeakable hell dimension she was in. (If you are finding this ridiculous, use a little imagination. I mean, Star Trek was just as hokey; how many deflector dish realignments before it got silly?) So they bring her back to life. Now most shows would have left it at that, destroying the entire dramatic element of the death. But the twist was this: Buffy had gone to Heaven, and her friends had ripped her out and brought her back. After feeling the nirvana of Heaven, it's safe to imagine it would be hard to find any joy in living once back on Earth. She had to deal with this difficult experience all season long. This, as will all of the plot elements have realistic and far-reaching consequences.

      Seriously. They mix comedy, action, but especially drama. It's definitely not the cheesy show the title would have you believe.

    6. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by eatenn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just the whole premise of the show is a turn-off for me.

      Seems to me it's this same mentality of dismissing the show based on it's premise that keeps Buffy from Getting an emmy.

      Try watching a couple episodes.

      --
      "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    7. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by KalvinB · · Score: 1

      "Why do so many folks watch it? The boobs?"

      Well, apparently it doesn't even really have that going for it.

      There's always the Boobwatch Wedding special comming up for that.

      Ben

    8. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Alexius · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but Buffy might have initially hooked viewers with boobs (or Alyson Hannigan, if you're me), but the story lines are amazing. Joss (the head honcho) will take everything you expect, then give you the opposite. The damsel in distress for the show is the guy, the pretty girl is the strongest amongst them, and the smart, rational one is the kid sister. Once you get used to his style he'll even throw you curve balls and do something normal. Joss also doesn't take the show too seriously. He makes comments about how standard things are ("Dawn's in trouble? Just another Tuesday night in Sunnydale."). It's a very well put together show.

      Give it a few episodes, You'd be surprised how well It's written.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    9. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by carpe_noctem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do so many folks watch it? The boobs?

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    10. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by drudd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I missed out on the first few seasons because I chalked it up as a spin-off of the terrible movie.

      After living with my girlfriend (now wife) I was forced to watch several episodes as she's a die-hard fan. I must admit I got hooked. Yes it's cheesy, and not always internally consistent, but compared with what else is on, it's great.

      Now whether it just shines next to such gems as Joe Millionaire and Married by America (gee thank you FOX), I'm not sure, but its one of just a couple shows on my regular weekly watch list.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    11. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like Baywatch?

    12. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh $DEITY

      Is that supposed to be funny?

    13. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by tfoss · · Score: 1
      Just the whole premise of the show is a turn-off for me.
      Why do so many folks watch it?

      Because many folks are able to get past a silly premise. Many people actually give it a shot before judging it.

      The thing is, its a very intelligent, well-written show, though lots of people don't take time to actually find that out. It's just too easy to dismiss as a stupid show because it has a stupid name. A pity.

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    14. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by mikemcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does the premise of a girl who doesn't need to be saved turn you off?

      I've dated some tough women in my time. They are FAR more interesting than the ones who "need" a hero.

      I saw an interview with Joss Whedon wherein he explained the genesis of BtVS. A scene in the series pilot embodied Whedon's vision: a pretty girl walks into an alley alone, followed by a Creature of the Night. In a traditional horror film, the girl would become Monster Chow. But Whedon and crew make their living by turning convention on its head.

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer is a tribute to, and satire of, the Horror genre. It is written by really smart people who assume that their audience is intelligent and literate.

      Hmm... here's some interesting anecdotal evidence. (Counting on fingers...) 75% of the people that I know who are "die hard" Buffy fans are Macintosh users. Mangle that statistic as you please.

    15. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      Yup. Alyson Hannigan is gorgeous.

      SMG isn't bad looking but she had the poor sense to do that series of Revlon or whatever ads where she was PURPLE. I can't believe society, en masse, decided that being purple is sexy. It was really quite hideous. So that's ruined her beauty for me. But Alyson's still hot.

    16. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by amnesty · · Score: 1

      You've hit the nail on the head.

      I tried for a long time to get my best friend into watching the show. When I finally convinced him to watch through season 1, at the same time he watched Dark Angel.

      After seeing a few episodes, he told me that while he recognized that the Buffy episodes were well-written and the characters were interesting, vampires and demons just didn't interest him, whereas in Dark Angel the premise kept him going even through the bad episodes.

      He argued that the premise was key. Because in five, ten seasons later, they still would be fighting vampires.

      How wrong he was. He managed to get through it, and realize that even the premise, the status-quo, the concept of the show was ever changing. Sure, the overall idea is that Buffy is the chosen one who must slay vampires. Season three toned down the vampire content and focussed on highschool life. Season four was about how college separates you from your friends, and tried to bring science into the mix. Season five was about family, and what it means to be a Slayer. Season six was about growing up and responsibility.

      I guess it's no surprise that Buffy is now his favourite show, even though he still isn't into vampires or demons. Even the cool premise of Dark Angel didn't save the bad writing, and he eventually got bored and stopped watching.

    17. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the smart, rational one is the kid sister


      Do you mean Dawn, whose impulsive poorly-considered decisions get people into trouble every episode?
    18. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Servo · · Score: 1

      I have attempted to watch it, but find the bad acting, bad scripting, and bad content to make me find something else to watch.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    19. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do so many folks watch it? The boobs?

      In case you haven't noticed, as cute as SMG is, she's got no boobs.

    20. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Duds · · Score: 2, Funny

      75% of the people that I know who are "die hard" Buffy fans are Macintosh users. Mangle that statistic as you please.


      75% of Macintosh users dress up as buffy on the weekends.

      mmm....mangled.

    21. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So, what you're saying is, you live in some past age when having the *girl* kill the monster instead of the *guy* constituted groundbreaking originality? Or perhaps you've been in a cardboard box since about 1955?

      I feel I have gained an insight into Buffy's viewer demographic.

    22. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's easier to get past names when you yourself are named after a psychotic robot suitor.

      (sorry)

    23. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      The other 25% of Macintosh Users dress up as Buffy on weekdays.:)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    24. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      if they don't like the premise, then thats it. You can't magical make them like the premise ragardless of the writing.

      Me I liked the premise, hate the show. I think its the acting. if I read the script, its funny. If I hear about the plot its usually interesting. I watch the show, it makes me wretch.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:DIE BUFFY DIE! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      they can be sold on something based on how it looks?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Geeks watch TV? by SparklesMalone · · Score: 1

    Unemployed geeks with time to watch TV instead of surf slashdot or try to figure out how to mod the latest open-source GNU tool?

  42. *SMACK!* by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats for besmirching the memory of Firefly by tainting it with shite from enterprise, you should be ashamed. May the Serenity and especially her crew;), RIP.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:*SMACK!* by KFury · · Score: 1

      You're just lucky I didn't ry to fit The West Wing in there as well...

  43. Buffy's already atleast twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably 3 times actually (since Willow brought her back yet again), and then there's the time she died in an alternate timeline... Anyway, the premise doesn't really give you a good view of the show. And it's really not like the movie, either. If you actually gave it a chance, you might like it.

  44. Cruel Intentions still rocks by silne · · Score: 1

    How can you say all her movies are crap? Cruel Intentions whilst not entirely original did show quite a bit of good acting on her part. I much preferred to look at Reese Witherspoon, but SMG was displaying some damn fine assets too.

    1. Re:Cruel Intentions still rocks by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      You must be kidding me. I've seen more convincing characters on Dragon Ball Z.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    2. Re:Cruel Intentions still rocks by silne · · Score: 1

      I think you said it all. I've never watched DZ, nor do I ever intend to. If that's the sort of show you prefer, then go for it. Personally I'd take SMG and Ryan Phillipe with a dash of Reese Witherspoon any day.

    3. Re:Cruel Intentions still rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd take SMG and Ryan Phillipe with a dash of Reese Witherspoon any day.

      I told you - no three-ways unless it's...waitaminnit.

    4. Re:Cruel Intentions still rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hows about a dash of shut the fuck up?

  45. B:tVS and Comments by Geeks by ryth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a geek and I love this show. I think it's rather sad that everyone feels the need to compare it to typical "geek" fare such as ST or Babylon. It's not in the same vein but that doesn't mean that it doesnt have total geek appeal and asthetic.

    Buffy has consistently been the most topical and best written show on TV for the last 4+ years. Admittedly the show is aimed at a younger and less "hard geek" audience, but in doing so I believe it validates itself. It's brought smart and intelligent writing (of the geek type) to "teenland". And at the same time it provides a rich and well defined fantasy "universe" that hardcore geeks can enjoy.

    The fact that you can have Star Trek, Apocolypse Now!, Comics, Twin Peaks and Shakespeare referenced regularily on a popular show with a core audience of 16 year olds is a grand enough achievement. All that without mentioning the 3-5 season spanning story arcs and incredibly fun writing.

    I could care less about Sarah Michelle Gellar (which seems to be bearing the brunt of the cheers about this show being cancelled) -- people really need to look beyond the fact that she's married to some other Hollywood dope, that the show has a ridiculous (but charming) name -- and really just evaluate the show for what it is. And I think most open-minded individuals who have actually seen the show would say that it is a charming, well written show with great acting and a very engaging mythos.

    1. Re:B:tVS and Comments by Geeks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I'm a geek and I love this show. "

      ". And I think most open-minded individuals who have actually seen the show would say that it is a charming, well written show with great acting and a very engaging mythos.
      "
      in other words:
      You are only open minded if you agree with me.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:B:tVS and Comments by Geeks by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Buffy has consistently been the most topical and best written show on TV for the last 4+ years.

      Hello? Westwing? I'm sure Buffy's great, but I don't see how you can make this blanket assumption.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  46. Re:On slashdot? Sure! by LoadStar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok, is it just me or is buffy totally not a geek show. No geeks I know watch(ed) it, and I dont watch it. So what the hell is this doing on the geek site slashdot?

    I consider myself a moderate geek, and I watch Buffy (and it's sibling show Angel). And you know what? As I write this, I can't for the life of me say exactly what hooked me and keeps me coming back for more.

    Of course part of it is the fact that the show raised the "stunt" episode to a new art form. "Hush" used silence, rather than dialogue, to tell a story, and used that silence to set a singularly creepy feeling to the episode. "The Body" was one of the best portrayals of the human reaction to a sudden loss of someone close. "Once More With Feeling" told a story in the form of a musical, without being even remotely corny or over the top - the musical numbers just flowed into the dialogue naturally.

    Another part of what attracted me to the show is what attracted many people here to Farscape - the writing. On the whole (excepting the odd clunker episodes that every series has) Buffy has some of the best writing on TV - enough to make you forget the patently - and by design - absurd concept for the show.

    But in the end, Buffy is one of those shows that unless you watch, you just don't and won't get what the fascination is with the show.

    Strangely enough, it seems to me that Buffy is just one of those shows that ratings just cannot begin to indicate how popular the show really is. Compared to shows on the larger networks, Buffy's ratings are not great (to put it mildly) - yet the announcement that it was coming to an end made headlines on virtually every major news source, and will be the cover story on next week's Entertainment Weekly. Obviously, it must be a big enough story and have enough people that care for it to get this much attention.

    Ah, well... all good things must come to an end, I suppose. Hopefully we continue to get more stories and shows from the Buffyverse (while continuing to realize the mistake of Star Trek, that too much of a good thing can be a bad thing).

  47. Spike is getting over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a soul as a vampire is bound to make you a bit angsty, but I really think Spike is getting back to his old sarcastic self. Spike in earlier seasons really is an awesome character to watch.

    1. Re:Spike is getting over it by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

      It's the coat. It's definitely the coat. Note the return of the badass Spike in 5x07, "Fool For Love", where you see him killing the other two slayers and actually getting the coat.

      --grendel drago

      --
      Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  48. Spinoff Series? by Monthenor · · Score: 4, Funny
    My Vote: The Fabulous Adventures of Andrew

    Kidding, just kidding...

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
    1. Re:Spinoff Series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer the Spike and Anya show... A vampire with a soul and an ex-demon, how much better can it be?!

    2. Re:Spinoff Series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (being a brit, I might not off see it yet)

      Spike does NOT have a soul, he has a chip.

    3. Re:Spinoff Series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he does. He got it at the end of season 6 when he visited that demon in the cave and passed his trials. I know season 7 is already airing in England since I discuss the show with someone there regularly. And, he got the chip removed a couple episodes ago because it was malfunctioning and was going to kill him.

    4. Re:Spinoff Series? by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Season 7 is on Sky One (pay-TV only). Ordinary TV (i.e. BBC Two) is currently mid way through Season 6.

    5. Re:Spinoff Series? by Farce+Pest · · Score: 1

      I think they should spin off a show pairing up Andrew with Bobby Trendy, and they can be evil decorators. If Andrew ever says "luxurious", I'll just die...

      --
      This message has been scanned for memes and dangerous content by MindScanner, and is believed to be unclean.
    6. Re:Spinoff Series? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      I think the working title for that show is "We Will Be As Gods."

    7. Re:Spinoff Series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      download it, i've seen the latest episode and sky1 is nowhere near close i think they are on ep 4 or 5 while i just saw 16!

    8. Re:Spinoff Series? by moirafey · · Score: 1

      I would SO watch that show!! :D The opening credits would have to be them dancing through that field...

      --
      "It comes in PINTS???"
    9. Re:Spinoff Series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fabulous Adventures of Andrew

      I thought this was that program.

      ...oh, you people are too sensitive.
      *ducks and runs for his life, nonetheless*

  49. Don't forget Xander's B5 plate collection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the fact Spike held a Boba Fett statue hostage, or Willow "Googling" someone, or... Lots of things. Xander fantasizing about T'Pol in gel would fit in right here on Slashdot. The evil nerd trio had a very big Star Wars obsession.

    1. Re:Don't forget Xander's B5 plate collection by ryth · · Score: 1

      .. and those are only some of the recent ones that come to mind. I'm still scouring my mind for the old-school ones from seasons 1/2/3.

  50. say it ain't so! by nallen · · Score: 1

    damnation, everything good goes away doesn't it?

  51. for a bunch of educated people... by rtphokie · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... Slashdotters sure seem to follow the same fads religiously, especially with entertainment. Linux,LOTR,Apple,Farscape, and apparantly Buffy

    1. Re:for a bunch of educated people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes but what are slashdotters educated in.... I doubt it has anything to do with society or culture or the ability to appreciate anything beyond a circuit board or big boobs

    2. Re:for a bunch of educated people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I like big boobs! Linux on the other hand...nope, no boobs at all. Sigh.

  52. vampires have been done by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    TO DEATH.. I mean come on.. we want something that is even *remotely* possible, and everyone knows the vampires, zombies, werewolves, all that jazz has been done again and again and again. That's why things like x-men (genetic mutations), farscape (interstellar travel and all that), and other comic book heros (see batman, spiderman, incredible hulk, etc) make good movies. However unlikely, some of these things could happen if perfectly ideal situations were set up.

    On a personal note.. I can't believe farscape is dying, and a show like buffy lasted as long as it did... GOOD RIDDANCE

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  53. Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe (god forbid) they'll actually try to build on a different story and create something alltogether and original.

    But wait, Firefly got cancelled.

  54. Uh, pass the crackpipe. by eatenn · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The third season? I realize that it's personal opinion, but how can you say the THIRD season was bad? I can understand a complaint about the fourth season (when the season story-arc kind of sucked, if only because it was poorly executed). And the sixth season was darker than usual and perhaps out of the show's character... But the third season was arguably the best!

    A brilliant, three-dimensional villain who wanted to become a giant snake and eat people... but who had hangups on germs and profanity. A slayer who was destined to rid the world of vampires and got a taste for killing people instead. And what about Buffy and Angel's relationship? It had survived monsters, demons and an apocalypse or two, but in the end it couldn't survive the sobering truth that ultimately, they just weren't compatible.

    It's these grey areas that make the show so brilliant. The bad guys aren't bad for no reason, the good guys have their weak moments, and the romance is relentlessly true-to-life. No other season represented that better than the third, IMO. It's out on DVD now, btw.



    Plus, females get fingerbanged by Hollywood. The only thing they're good for, it appears, is to be rescued. I don't know about you, but female empowerment is sexy :)

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    1. Re:Uh, pass the crackpipe. by tmhsiao · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While significantly stronger than most of the subsequent seasons, the third season is marred by a couple of issues.

      The Mayor's character, while well-quirked and fleshed-out, never really had any ambitions beyond turning himself into a giant snake. The Master wished to free himself, Angelus wanted to foment chaos, and even Glory wanted to escape the mundanity of this plane of existence. But for all the buildup, for all the anticipation for what the Ascension was to be, turning into a giant snake was a bit of a letdown.

      Faith's turn to darkness wasn't so much a spiraling descent more than a flip of the "Let's turn her insane" switch. The problem with this particular facet of season three is that from "Consequences" on, we're to assume that (at least according to what's presented and Angel's somewhat authorial edict) Faith has "got a taste for killing" following the accidental manslaughter of the deputy mayor--it's this lame reason that she tries to strangle Xander in that episode. The writers decided to ignore the more compelling (and more foreshadowed) reasons Faith could turn to the dark side.

      While you might find the Buffy-Angel romance of season three a prime facet of season three, the execution of it showed that the then multiplying writing staff had some trouble deciding what their week-to-week status was. One week, Buffy would breakup with Angel, the next they'd be all over one another. It got so melodramatic, they parodied themselves in "The Zeppo."

      All of these are minor cracks in the veneer of season three. The main issue I can't really forgive it, despite the general fun of the villainous Mayor, is the failed metaphor that the writers try and foist upon us for the season finale. When faced with the prospect of losing the world or losing her boyfriend, she chooses to risk her own life--the life of the only person who's really capable of preventing Apocalypse--to save her lover. Despite the touching scene at the end where Giles hands Buffy her diploma, the two-part "Graduation" shows that Buffy is still very much a petulant child, and not at all ready to "graduate" to the responsibilities and sacrifices of adulthood.

      Sheesh. I'm a geek...

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  55. Willow by tomdarch · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or has BtVS more or less become the Willow show? Maybe it's just that all the more intersting parts of the show have revolved around Willow. If they're looking for a more interesting spin off, I say center it on Willow.

    1. Re:Willow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're looking for a more interesting spin off, I say center it on Willow.


      Yeah! They can call it "Willow the Vampire Flayer".
    2. Re:Willow by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Only if they can get Mad Mordigan back...

      hey, it was either that, or a lesbian joke.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. Eh, whatever. by chrome · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I really don't care. Buffy is yet another one of those shows that I'll never mourn of it's passing.

    Maybe it is because I never 'got' the show. I mean, the bad acting, the convoluted plot, the bad acting, the excessive special (and not very special, at that) effects, the bad acting ...

    Did I mention the bad acting?

    Sorry, but this show never rated for me. I'd rather watch japanese comedy shows ...

  57. ooh. spinoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLEASE let it be "willow the witch" or something.
    We all know that BtVS was really the WILLOW SHOW.

    yay sexy lesbian witchiness!

    heh

  58. and it could be called Willow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Buffy Slayer

    1. Re:and it could be called Willow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Willow the Slayer Slayer?

      Actually, I hope they kill off Buffy at the end of the series. Not because I don't like her, or the show, or anything like that. But it would be quite fitting.

  59. "Spike loves Buffy" ala "Jonie loves Chachi" by infonography · · Score: 1
    Yes, admit it, you remember it.

    Ralph Macchio must be some soft of demon immortal like Dick Clark so it's gotta fit. Likely they will work him in at some point.

    Maybe 'Willow loves Kennedy'? sort of a witchy 'Ellen'.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  60. Talent wastage... by Goonie · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The point is that what could Whedon and co be doing if they weren't writing yet another series of Buffy?

    Eventually all the things that can be done within the confines of a series, get done, and the series gets stale, particularly on character-driven shows like Buffy. (Law and Order, for example, is easier to sustain because it doesn't depend so much on character, more issues which they often pretty much rip out of the newspaper). With Buffy, they have done well to sustain things by letting the characters grow up, introducing and killing off other characters, and so on, but, still, it would be much easier to write for a new series where there's still room to flesh out the characters and play with new relationships, and produce better results.

    So don't just think of what you're gaining from the umpteenth series of your favourite show, think of what you're losing by having your favourite writers struggle to take the characters places we haven't already seen before.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Talent wastage... by Golias · · Score: 1
      The point is that what could Whedon and co be doing if they weren't writing yet another series of Buffy?

      Well, they could write a brilliant sci-fi western in which there is no sound in space, no rubber-headed aliens, and no cheap technobable deus-ex-machina endings. It would be everything Star Trek isn't, and it could be the best sci-fi show on TV.

      But that would probably just get canceled by fox after 14 episodes.

      P.S. Law and Order is not, and never was, good TV. Character-driven shows are the only ones that matter, and the way you keep them from getting stale is by letting the characters evolve over time, the way real people do. (The character of Willow bears almost no resemblence to the mousy little girl she was in season 1, but the elements of the person she would become were pretty much all there from the beginning. Her character slightly evolved every single year, so when certain things happened, such as her first lesbian experience, and her "addiction" to witchcraft, fans of the show were not surprised, because they were always logical places for her character to go. I, for one, would love to see what path Willow takes for the next few years.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Talent wastage... by bnenning · · Score: 2, Interesting
      when certain things happened, such as her first lesbian experience, and her "addiction" to witchcraft, fans of the show were not surprised, because they were always logical places for her character to go. I, for one, would love to see what path Willow takes for the next few years.


      Absolutely. It's fascinating to watch her in season 1 and 2 episodes and realize she'll be destroying the world 5 years later, and yet it's a mostly reasonable progression. My only complaint is that the "magic=drugs" metaphor was very heavy-handed and clumsy. They could have done something along the lines of her using so much power that she was tapping into a demon dimension which gradually affected her mind. Instead we got something that looked like an ad from the DEA with burned-out "druggies" and scummy "dealers" and peer pressure from irresponsible friends. Just silly.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:Talent wastage... by Golias · · Score: 1

      I think one or two of the ME writers must have gone through rehab at one point or another. The two-part Angel episode with Faith was also descibed by some as being very "twelve-steppy."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Talent wastage... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      P.S. Law and Order is not, and never was, good TV.

      L&O is character driven- but the characters aren't the permanent cast, they're the guest stars. Those are the people whose goals and emotions really matter- the victims, the perpetrators, and the witnesses.

      Films are great because they use these characters who are expendable,they don't have to keep them around. You can watch meaningful, irrevocable changes to a person's life. The writer is allowed to make dramatic changes at any time, and doesn't have to reset things for the next episode.

      Long-running TV shows become ludicrous because the same group of people is sent to different combinations of skewed emotional extremes again and again. (And, if sci-fi, changed into dangerous monsters again and again)

      Wolf evaded that with L&O, because the permanent cast is only there to help the viewer watch the new characters.

      (Rod Sterling evaded that with Twilight Zone, because he had new guest stars to turn into monsters)

      (The few times L&O tried to make interesting characters out of the permanent cast proved embarrasing.)

    5. Re:Talent wastage... by YetAnotherAnonymousC · · Score: 1

      Character-driven shows are the only ones that matter

      I like the Price is Right. No character development there. (unless you count when Bob Barker let his hair go grey)

    6. Re:Talent wastage... by Saige · · Score: 1

      Well, they could write a brilliant sci-fi western in which there is no sound in space, no rubber-headed aliens, and no cheap technobable deus-ex-machina endings. It would be everything Star Trek isn't, and it could be the best sci-fi show on TV.

      But that would probably just get canceled by fox after 14 episodes.


      Well, if they write one, we can wait and see if Fox cancels it after 14 episodes.

      Instead, they wrote Firefly, which I saw a couple times due to a friend watching it - and I was so happy when the episode was over because it meant I didn't have to suffer through it anymore.

      And believe me, I expected it to be good, due to being written by Whedon. I was wrong.

      "Sci-fi western"? My god, who even gave that idea a green light? Especially when it was so blatant - watching people go from a spacecraft onto a planet where everyone looked, acted, and sounded like they came directly from a bad western series?

      What's next? People living in feudal monarchies complete with castles, knights, and longbows, where people just happen to have inter-dimensional travel and nanotechnology?

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    7. Re:Talent wastage... by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Funny
      What's next? People living in feudal monarchies complete with castles, knights, and longbows, where people just happen to have inter-dimensional travel and nanotechnology?

      Hey, there are some good Andromeda episodes.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Talent wastage... by prator · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about the "magic=drugs" thing is that Giles and the coven that Willow went to after almost destroying the world told her that the whole abstinence thing was completely wrong.

      -prator

    9. Re:Talent wastage... by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Right, I can't see that as anything other than the writers realizing "whoops, we need Willow to be able to do *some* magic, so let's ignore most of what we said last season." I'm glad they did that, but it's a flaw in the show's usually excellent internal consistency.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    10. Re:Talent wastage... by juandosmil · · Score: 1
      What's next? People living in feudal monarchies complete with castles, knights, and longbows, where people just happen to have inter-dimensional travel and nanotechnology?

      They did this - it was called Dune.

    11. Re:Talent wastage... by prator · · Score: 1

      I definitely didn't like the whole drugs analogy, but I viewed it more as a mistake that Buffy and the Scoobies made by treating Willow the way they did. They had the whole "out of their own" thing going without Giles, and they stuck with it, but it seemed that a simple call the England would have saved them a lot of trouble.

      -prator

  61. Buffy is for the geeks by ThePolemarch · · Score: 1

    /lurk Throughout Buffy's history, it has been known for outstanding writing with a mythology requiring continuity and a knowledge of the first seasons, great character interaction, and witty writing. No show has ever held my attention, invoked so wide an emotional range, or wrapped me up in its mythology (excluding Star Trek) as Buffy has. The continuity rich, mythic proportions of the show are perfect for the geek nature. Buffy has been the best show on TV for years, and I hope it rests in peace (with maybe a vampiresque resurrection.) Thanks for the memories.

    --

    A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right.
    -Thomas Paine
  62. movie was better anyway by Down8 · · Score: 1

    Finally!

    Movie was better anyway.

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  63. What about... by gnarled · · Score: 1
    She clearly should not be allowed on film, unless (maybe) it's a Buffy movie.


    Ummm I wouldn't mind her in a porno either
    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
    1. Re:What about... by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

      Buffy the Vagina Muncher.......mmmmm, has a nice ring to it.

      --
      [ ]
    2. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But perhaps not as good a ring as this.

      (someday I'll have to download that off edonkey and find out just how awful a porn spoof can be)

    3. Re:What about... by slaker · · Score: 1

      Er, both "Buffy, the Vampire Layer" and "Muffy the Vampire Slayer" are already taken. I have both (the 2nd is the much better one, BTW).

      "Buffy" fan and someone willing to admit to porno-geekdom. Yup. Amazing I ever got a woman. :)

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  64. Emmy's by Geekbot · · Score: 1

    I always thought that the guy who plays Xander was the best. He's great at the comedy, great at the sympathy, and he's pretty much an archtype for a lot of the geeks in here who weren't cool, but didn't really have a lot to share with the even para-cool kids that they hung out with. He's not the big star of the show, but every show that focus's on him have been some of the very best of the series. Xander gets laid was great, and it's hard to beat two xanders episode.

    The cast is incredible all the way around, but the material is great. Lots of comedy, action, drama. Although I think it's the complex and really well thought out plots that really make the show so incredible. It's the best show on TV.

    1. Re:Emmy's by schon · · Score: 1

      every show that focus's on him have been some of the very best of the series

      Agreed..

      Xander gets laid was great

      Was that the one where he beds Faith, then turns to the camera and says "Hey, I just got laid!"?

      and it's hard to beat two xanders episode.

      I think my all time favourite episode was the one where all the girls in town fall in love with him.. The scene where he walks down the corridor in slow motion was hilarious..

    2. Re:Emmy's by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      YES!!!!

      Every Geek's dream, at with the intention of semi-revenge against a cheerleader no less!!! WOO HOO! Xander rocks, he's banged a Slayer, a demon, been caged up by his hot teacher for sexually deviant reasons (she was hot while not being a bug). I wish I was Xander.... Or even one of the Split Xanders.

  65. News For Nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I'll give you that one. Hopeless, cronic Victoria Secret catalog masturbating nerds, but nerds none the less. Stuff that matters? Fuck no. The same idiot that allows this story in is probably the one who's rejected much more relivent stories, at least 10 of which I know I've submitted. God knows how much other relivent news has been hit.

    1. Re:News For Nerds... by malex23 · · Score: 1
      The same idiot that allows this story in is probably the one who's rejected much more relivent stories, at least 10 of which I know I've submitted.

      Oh, your precious stories were rejected? Let us all weep openly for this grave injustice.
      Say, maybe do ya think it was because you're an Anonymous Coward?

    2. Re:News For Nerds... by Bloodmoon1 · · Score: 1

      Really, the AC thing is more because I don't feel like getting modded down by the same oxygen thiefs who consider this to be news. Jesus, I get meta-modded unfair if I mod down a pro Linux comment as flamebait that's in the middle of a Apple story and more or less calls anyone who uses anything besides Linux a moron. I'm not complaining so much that my stories were rejected, I can handle that just fine, I've been a news reporter, it happens, I understand that. I'm complaining that this dribble was accepted when many more worthy stories were rejected. Not just mine. For example, I personally have had stories about court decisions on Internet bans, large law suits affecting several tech companies, and Apple's open sourcing of various technologies, as well as several interesting science stories, all rejected. And that's just me.

      You're the highest # I've seen, so that means there are at least 645,752 Slashdot users. Now, assuming 1% of those submit a story a month, that means there are 6457 stories/month. I'm sure there's probably many more total stories than that, but let's go ahead and use that number. Now say there's 20 stories/day accepted, 30 * 20 = 600 stories in a month accepted, 5857 rejected. Again, surely a very low number. Now, out of all those stories, you can't tell me there weren't easly 100 more that were more news worthy than this. And you've clearly never submitted a story, (or much of an original thought, since out of the 11 comments to your credit, 1 is not a reply), or you just can't pay attention to details, otherwise you would have noted that submitting as an AC does not effect your chance to have a story accepted.

      So just to review, a couple of editors either: A) Get a hard on from someone on Buffy and thereby allow crap like this through due to their infatuation, or B) Are 13 year old girls and thereby allow crap like this through due to their infatuation.

      Now, I'm done with my rant. And just for you, my precious stealer of breath, I won't post AC this time. And all of you mods can come and try to karma fuck me, because I really don't give a shit. Honestly, I'll be a little dissapointed if I don't get AT LEAST a -1 for this.

      And to stop the gravest injustice being done to me at this moment: Move away from my air space, and do it quickly, oxygen thief!

      --

      Request: ECM unit, 1000 km fullerene cable, 1 tactical nuclear weapon. Reason: Birthday party for foreign dignitary.
    3. Re:News For Nerds... by malex23 · · Score: 1
      So just to review, a couple of editors either: A) Get a hard on from someone on Buffy and thereby allow crap like this through due to their infatuation, or B) Are 13 year old girls and thereby allow crap like this through due to their infatuation.

      Or, just freaking maybe, C) BTVS is a show with a massive Nerd following that cares about this announcement.

      Skim though some of the non-flamebait threads on this topic. If personally you don't care for the show, fine whatever. However, to dismiss it's fans as "hopeless, cronic Victoria Secret catalog masturbating nerds" who are horndogs for Gellar is nothing more than rank stupidity and yeah, you deserve to be bitchslapped for it.

      I mean seriously, everyone knows it's All About Willow...

  66. Buffy will NEVER die! by thedbp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a latecomer to the Buffy fanbase, but that makes me no less ardent. For years I held disdain for the show, specifically because of SMG. Its the same reason I hated Led Zepplin for so long, because I hated Robert Plant. But I learned to appreciate Led Zep and tune out that godforsaken racket they passed for vocals, and as such I learned to appreciate Buffy. What surprised me however, is that for the first time I didn't hate SMG. In fact, I was quite impressed by her.

    I could go on about the writing, the depth of character and plotline, the deft self-awareness and irony, the throwaway quips that were gems of pop culture gone wrong, but I'd just be rehashing what everyone else has already said. Whoops, I did too.

    But seriously, check out the Buffy listings on TV Guide or TitanTV or something. Buffy is on in full effect, y0, and y00z bitchez b3tta b3 sh0\/\/in' r3sP3ct!

    and the DVDs will keep on coming ... I wish Joss Whedon good in all he does, because I know I can trust that I'll enjoy it. Beyond the great acting and the intensely detailed characters brought to life by the entire cast, Buffy is really more of a vibe. I feel it. Do you feel it? Come on, you know you feel it.

    I've become too long winded. But rest assured that Buffy isn't going away any time soon. Even Knight Rider is back on the air. Even if Buffy goes away, she'll ALWAYS be back! That's the great part about retro. And the retro cycle is getting shorter and shorter. Pretty soon, all of society will have witnessed the drama, comedy, learning, and healing that Buffy brings. And, like Bill and Ted before them, become icons for the future, building generations on sound morals, excellent taste, and a penchant for witty banter to be reckoned with.

    You just wait.

    1. Re:Buffy will NEVER die! by SolubleFrank · · Score: 1

      >because I know I can trust that I'll enjoy it Alien Resurrection.

      --
      Feed me a stray cat.
    2. Re:Buffy will NEVER die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could go on about the writing, the depth of character and plotline...

      etc etc etc. And you did... just like every other pathetic drooling fanboy loser in this thread. Look, hoser, Buffy the vampire slayer is TEEN drama with pert breasted chicks and lipstick lesbos -- and it is made all the worse because ignorant fucktards like you go on about it like it's fine literature.

      Do *PLEASE* be quiet and slope off back to your masturbatory SMG fantasy, 'kay?

    3. Re:Buffy will NEVER die! by Noren · · Score: 1
      That's the great part about retro. And the retro cycle is getting shorter and shorter.
      It seems like a good thing until you extend it to its logical conclusion- we're rapidly approaching a retro singularity, when retro converges on the present day! See this shocking news article.
    4. Re:Buffy will NEVER die! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      nothing is worse then a convert.
      man, have some dignity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Buffy will NEVER die! by thedbp · · Score: 1

      Aw, that's so cute ? you sound just like Giles chastising the Scoobies!

  67. Crazy Fans by sahidrajar · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget that Buffy fans are just as obsessive as trekkie, and Star Wars fans that troll Slashdot. Link goes to my girlfriend's (obsessive) site. Buffy Online

  68. 7 Years is the magical number by alexhmit01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From what I've read, a show really needs 5 years to go into syndication, with improvements up to 7 years. As a rule, the studios don't make much money on the first-run of the show, the profits are in syndicating it afterwards. So while Fox wasn't making money off WB/UPN (probably were with UPN, who overpaid to get a hot franchise), it is making money licensing it to its FX subsidiary and the weekend syndication rights.

    Once 7 years are complete, the studio has no incentive to "subsidize" the production of the show, which is why most successful shows die at that point. The actors get over compensated for 7 years, which they wouldn't past that. As a result, the actors leave, because it stops being worth it.

    No specialized knowledge, just parroting what I've read... feel free to correct if you're "in the industry" and can correct where I'm wrong.

    Alex

    1. Re:7 Years is the magical number by wednesdaywar · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about something related to this for a while. My theory is something to the effect of "Dramatic shows have a 5 year cycle of goodness, after which they decline rapidly". It happens sooner in many cases, but it seems like year 1-2 is spent figuring out the characters, introducing us to their quirks, establishing in general. After this, we get seasons 3-4 which generally rock. Season 5 and after tend to decline in quality and originality. THis seems to hold true for Buffy, Angel, ST:TNG, and most shows I've put to the test. There may an additional rule for shows that entirely change writing staffs and put up a new 5 year cycle. I don't watch Law and Order or ER, but maybe someone can let me know whether they too fit the pattern. At any rate, Buffy's hung around about 2 years too long, and ST:TNG was wearing out it's welcome in S7 too....

  69. Five by Five (Re:The way to continue....) by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

    Is to do a spin off with "Faith" Eliza Dushku's charachter. She will be coming back for the final 5 episodes, and its the perfect lead in. Josh Wheedon has been in talks with her from all accounts. I think with a edgier, sexier slayer a spin off could do quite well.
    It also makes sense because the slayer line runs through Faith, not Buffy. B has been a dead end since the Master killed her. The line ran from her through Kendra to Faith. That is why we didn't get yet another slayer the last time she died.

    Eliza Dushku is awefully pretty. Plus she's from Boston (Watertown).
    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
  70. Unfair and Unfounded by thedbp · · Score: 1

    Spikes been through a lot. Cut a brother some slack, man.

    1. Re:Unfair and Unfounded by ZvlvLord · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my favorite ones with Spike is when he's bitching about how he used to be bad ass and all... I just roll on the floor. The time Buffy & Spike wake up in each other's arms, bruised, bleeding, after having FUKCED all night, the look in their eyes is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too funny. I could just die.

  71. Are her titties begining to sag already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, get some silicon into those love mounds and the show will last a few more years.

  72. What the hell is wrong with Angel anyhow? by disc0rdian · · Score: 1

    I admit the first few episodes weren't anything special but the plotline lately (season 3/4) have really shown the potential of the show.

  73. Possible Spin Offs by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hillary the Copyright Pirate Slayer
    Shrub the English Language Slayer
    Willow in Lesbian Makeout Scene of the Week
    Ethyl the Aardvark Goes Quantity Surveying

    It should be an interesting season...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  74. Mmmmmm... Sabrina Lloyd by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1


    Any Sports Night fans around? Best thing that ever happened to my DVD player (and worst thing to happen to my dissertation...)

    1. Re:Mmmmmm... Sabrina Lloyd by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm still pissed at West Wing for killing it.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  75. Glad it's now by Geekbot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I love Buffy the show, although I've never been crazy about SMG. My wife introduced me to the show when we were dating. We watch it every week since, and we've been married almost 5 years now. I'll miss it very, very much. Maybe it's sad that a tv show can be such a big part of your life, but it's a tradition, and it's something that my wife and I loved watching together, gave us things to laugh about together, and talk about together. It's been more than a show to me, it's been special time with the woman I love and I'll always think of those early days dating my wife, watching the 1st season episodes she taped while sitting in her tiny apartment, whenever I think of Buffy.

    That said....No one wants to see a show that runs out of fuel. I also used to watch X-Files with my wife, but I hate that show, that never gave me any good answers despite dozens of promises, that gave forth a bunch of weak plots that didn't go anywhere, why oh why could they not have said, let's go out with a bang instead of slowly bleeding to death in the gutter.

    Buffy could probably pull off another season, but they've already had to import some big new characters, mainly a sister. This just barely skirts around the Jump the Shark law that states that adding a kid kills a show or at least indicates the show is dying. She was kind of a teenager, so they could get away with it, but still...

    So I say, Joss has killed major loved characters before (jonathon, tara, gyspy teacher). I say, Joss, kill the entire cast and keep them dead, just to show you have the balls to do it.

    Firefly, the 2nd best show on TV is already cancelled from what I understand, why oh why can't we get good Sci-Fi on TV at a decent time and keep it on.

    1. Re:Glad it's now by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You were dating your wife?

      ok, ill get out now.

    2. Re:Glad it's now by Snaller · · Score: 1

      This just barely skirts around the Jump the Shark law that states that adding a kid kills a show or at least indicates the show is dying.

      Great, that means 7th Heaven must be near death now ;)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:Glad it's now by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Tara was much loved? She looked like she was missing chromosome 23. She was a terrible actress, she needed to lose around 20 lbs and get a face transplant.

      Actually she looked like a woman, unlike the rest of anorexic females on that show

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    4. Re:Glad it's now by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      I say, Joss, kill the entire cast and keep them dead, just to show you have the balls to do it.

      That would be interesting. Though I think it'd be tough to do at this point unless he's been planning it all along.

      And it wouldn't be new. In fact, there was a show when I was a kid..."sledgehammer"? I can't remember for sure what the name was...anyway, the finale was him trying to disarm a nuclear bomb, but he screwed up and killed everyone. Show ended with a broad shot of a barren wasteland, all the buildings levelled, etc.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    5. Re:Glad it's now by someone247356 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was refreshing to see Josh cast a woman that actually looks like one.

      Perhaps you prefer looking at "perfect" women, but personally it's refreshing to see the real thing.

      Besides, the character of Tara was arguably the most compassionate and grounded character on the series.

      "Much loved" is a very apt description for that character.

      Perhaps you are mistook the original poster's comment for "Most wished to have sex with"?

      --
      Just my $0.02 (Canadian, before taxes)
  76. "One of the best shows ever?" by when_i_nod_off · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What are you guys smokin'? That show was one of the biggest turds ever. Right up there with reality programs, awards shows, sports TV, and %99 of the rest of the programs! Gross.

  77. More like Luke and Laura by misuba · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm showing my age with that reference, but the continuing romantic tension between the heroine and the man who attempted to rape her has been one of the biggest turnoffs this season of a show I used to like. Jumped the shark indeed.

    --

    If you don't pretend to be anyone, are you?

    1. Re:More like Luke and Laura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. He did not try to rape her. They REPEATEDLY had VERY rough sex (knocking down a building!), and it was hardly the first time she "protested" before giving in. Once he realized that this time no actually meant no, he was very shocked and sorry. So sorry that he went off and did what he had to become a better a man, one with a soul.

    2. Re:More like Luke and Laura by drudd · · Score: 1

      I was really turned off by that scene as well, but I'm not sure that overall their contiued tension is a bad thing.

      One of the worst aspects of television is it's tendency to push oversimplified situations and plotlines onto the viewer leaving them with no room for interpretation or thought (which is of course why so many people like TV).

      Nothing about rape or violence between people is simple or straight forward. Buffy is not attempting to take that scene and turn it into a morality play, which I consider a good thing.

      So while I didn't like what they did with the characters in creating that particular scene, I like that the show has a little more depth than the average show, and that it isn't cut-and-dry.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    3. Re:More like Luke and Laura by misuba · · Score: 1
      That's the thing: Buffy's always been one of the most moral shows on television. Not moralistic, but always clearly presenting a certain very honorable view of the world.

      The way they're handling the Spike relationship would not be such a big problem if I didn't keep seeing James Marsters' image on merchandise aimed at the younger part of the show's demographic.

      Again, maybe I'm just showing my age here.

      --

      If you don't pretend to be anyone, are you?

    4. Re:More like Luke and Laura by infonography · · Score: 1
      Hmm, well.

      To me it's always been kind of uncertain as to the rape aspect. If you like rough sex then you have to make allowances for the other partner crossing a line you yourself blurred. No safe word, no though out resolution to that issue. She (Buffy the FICTIONAL CHARACTER) dropped way out of character on that one. That character is not a victim. Also she's stronger then Spike. She could have over powered him and told him flat out to stop. However the plot line dictated that they would break up violently. So he would move on the getting his soul back. [Cause & Effect]

      As to Luke and Laura, well I don't ever watch soaps but names do drift out over time. Buffy is the about the only show on network TV I will regularly watch.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    5. Re:More like Luke and Laura by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      I think they've been very clear that Spike's attempted rape of Buffy was morally wrong (just in the way they've mentioned that event in subsequent episodes). I agree that it's a very shocking scene to show on television, but that scene plays a very pivotal role in the overall story arc since it was the event that triggered Spike to leave and seek his soul.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  78. Spin-Off by ihatewinXP · · Score: 1

    I think that show needs to do a one-handed back spin-off the damn TV. A vampire show that has really lousy vampires and a teeny bopper star? Its not what your going to spin-off its how your going to 'spin' it.
    Step 1: Buffy
    Step 2: Bad spin-off
    Step 3: ?????
    Step 4: Profit!

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    1. Re:Spin-off by planarian1 · · Score: 1

      how about "Scruffy the Empire Slayer" ?

      nice, honest anthro-fighting-corporate-jerkhole action.. ;D

      --
      "One may conquer in battle a thousand times a thousand men, but he is the greatest of conquerors who conquers himself."
    2. Re:Spin-off by NetSettler · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I was more imagining

      Scruffy, the Vampire Spayer's dog

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    3. Re:Spin-off by planarian1 · · Score: 1

      i =had= thought of that.. (or something along similar lines..) ;)~

      --
      "One may conquer in battle a thousand times a thousand men, but he is the greatest of conquerors who conquers himself."
  79. Come on, they SO telegraphed this by misuba · · Score: 2

    We've known since September that SMG's contract was up for renewal after this season and she hadn't made up her mind. And they've been throwing around crazy references to seasons past, in almost every episode. This announcement could not have been foreshadowed more starkly, and if you're surprised by it, then frankly, you reflect the level of intelligence the show's last two seasons have descended to.

    Okay, maybe that's sort of harsh. And I admit I liked the musical. There, I said it.

    --

    If you don't pretend to be anyone, are you?

    1. Re:Come on, they SO telegraphed this by geekoid · · Score: 1

      In short, most Buffy viewers were suprised.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truer words were never spoken.

  81. Say It Ain't So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no. Now people will have to find a new show with a hottie heroine so they can download faked pr0n pics of said hottie. Oh yeah. Wouldn't hurt if it was about Vampires, either...

  82. The show is not dead... by Eggman27 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...it's just resting - I think it'll go for a walk!

    To sort of refute the henny-penny doom-mongers and nay-sayers, while SMG's tenure on the show is definitely over, the series is by no means on its last legs. A quick look to one of the many spoiler sites (Spoiler Slayer, Wendy's Spoiler Zone, to name a couple), shows that there are already plans for a spin-off. And while it won't be quite the same without SMG or Eliz Dushku (who has signed on for a Fox pilot for next season), there's still some unexplored territory there.

    I realize there are some for "Buffy" is not their cup of tea, but for those who call the show 'bad', I would wager that they haven't seen any of the scores of decent episodes in the series.

  83. A spinoff will not be successful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All he has to do is have Buffy's soul enter the body of a similarly freshly dead potential and voila... same buffy, new actress.

    Then again, it has to end some time.

  84. Buffy is the stupidest show on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only pathetic slashbots would think this stupid show is worth watching. It's typical of the useless trash on TV nowadays. Would that every show was as good as The Simpsons. No, I'm not a troll, just a lone voice of reason.

  85. German? by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    "Oh, it's just german for 'The Buffy, the.'"
    "Anyone who's German can't be bad."

    Why do people watch it? Here's a few reasons, in the form of quotes from the show:

    "...it's the biggest con since Ghengis."

    "Any last requests?"
    "Don't kill me."

    "You never give me any support."
    "I give you plenty of support. I'm a flying butress of support!"

    Plus there's all the great made-up/oblique slang, like "5x5" (meaning "doing great"), or "kicking the gearshift" (for making out in a car).

    Sure, it's no "Uncle Vanya," nor is it even perfect entertainment like "Raiders of the Lost Ark," but if you're looking for a show to ease your mind after getting home from work, you can't do any better than Buffy. I'm currently hooked on the reruns on FX every night, which they're showing in glorious order (they're just starting the 5th season now). My favorite part about the whole show? It never gets stale. There is no status quo. It gets built up and torn down on an almost daily basis. I can't think of any other show that has such a blatant disregard for the status quo as Buffy. Sopranos even. During the 2nd season, they were getting into a lot of stuff that was calling into question the whole idea of being in the mafia, and then they ignored it and went back to business as usual. Not the Buffy writers - they have balls.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:German? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5x5 is radio operator speak for the highest rating of both signal strength and clarity. It had also made it into teen slang usage meaning hunky-dory (whatever the hell that means ;) long before Faith ever used it on screen.

  86. Nerf Herder by L0k11 · · Score: 1

    As long as they kept the Nerf Herder doing the theme I'd be happy! Never watched the show much anyway... but Nerf Herder rule.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
  87. Re:buffy was over when the movie came out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sub machine gun man.

    The folks at slashdot are crazy about him.

  88. that's just too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i really don't see how anyone could really enjoy watching that show. it's a clever idea, i guess, but it could only reasonably last one season. the only reason people kept watching it was because of sarah whats-her-face.
    it's good for all of society to shut it down.

  89. As for spin-offs... by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ...I want Ripper, damnit.

  90. I totally disagree... by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1


    She could have a very profitable movie career. Or she could have an uneventful one with her clothes on...

  91. This was bound to happen.. by katalyst · · Score: 1

    coz its the vampires who are immortal and not the vampire slayers ;)
    Coming to think of it... the best vampire series that one can do would be BLADE :D

    --
    |/________
    |\A|ALYS|
  92. Re:On slashdot? Sure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I consider myself a moderate geek, and I watch Buffy (and it's sibling show Angel). And you know what? As I write this, I can't for the life of me say exactly what hooked me and keeps me coming back for more.

    Mind if I posit a possible reason? You're a mindless dolt, with nothing more important than life than watching television for hours on end and sitting in front of your PC playing multi-user "strategy" games with your like-minded (virtual) friends. You've not even ONCE contemplated picking your fatass off of your fucking chair, going out and getting some sun and EXERCISE, and maybe just MAYBE meet up and actually TALK to a real-live human girl, rather than wank off 5 times a week to Sarah Michelle Gellar images.

  93. *SMACK!* x2 by fuzza · · Score: 1

    travels by starship from world to world to (and this part's key) alphabetically insult, and then slay, every demon in the known universe

    How can you call this the key part without even mentioning its source (HHGTTG #3)? How DARE you!

    Seriously, good ol' Wowbagger. I think he and Agrajag (sp?) were my favourite minor characters from the series.

    RIP, DNA...

    --
    Can't find examples of evolution? No matter, neither could Dawkins
  94. Ahh. Willow by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I just love that "my nose is stuffed" voice. But she's hot so I can deal with it. Here have some google cached pics Willow Pics

  95. Far from it by gakguk · · Score: 1

    Doh. Here in Turkey, we are a couple of seasons behind the US.

  96. Re:Watched three shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 28 and think it's great. A lot more intelligent than almost anything else out there, with lots of subtle irony and some of the best one-liners I've ever heard.

  97. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with everything that everyone who is earning karma points says. Can I have some karma now?

    1. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Cowards don't have karma, silly. They're reborn as another Anonymous Coward with every post. It's pretty horrible when you think of it.

      I'd give you a mod point anyway, but I'm fresh out.

      Here I go again...

  98. SLASHCRAP should be the name of the site by zymano · · Score: 0

    lamer and lamer shit being posted. If you try to post legitimate science news it's never accepted but BUFFY news will. LAme!

  99. One of the best shows ever ? by bushboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What ?
    And the planet you live on is ?

    If you consider buffy the vampire slayer one of the best shows ever, you really need HELP now !

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  100. yay (sorta) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ive been a buffy watcher since season 1, and i mist say i am very glad they are ending the show now before it starts to get bad. I haven't had the same intrest i used to have in the show since season 5. I would have been very happy to see it end with buffy's tragic death.
    But since JW got 2 more seasons, some problems have arisen:
    1. He originally didn't plan for this, and wrote an overall story to end at season 5, leaving the seasons 6 and 7 (mainly 7) feeling a bit tacked on.
    2. All the freakin character relationships, love triangles, etc. Mainly season 6, feturing such classics as "Xander tuning in just as Anya and Spike are doing the deed" and "Massive kissing on behalf of Willow and Tara." Ugh. Not to say the season's suck, they just lacked somethings that were present in the original 5 seasons.
    Anyway, my 2 cents.

  101. Re: MST3K by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
    I'd argue Mystery Science Theater 3000 was good even then. Actually, one of my best buddies and I, with whom I watched the show, both had expectations it would go downhill with the departure of Trace Beaulieu, but were we ever gloriously wrong. Somehow, all the changes made during the eighth season (the first Sci-Fi season) - the switch from Dr. F to Pearl, "Brain Guy," and Bobo, continuing storylines in the host segments, the SoL and the Widowmaker running around the universe rather than being tied to Earth, etc. - really freshened the show, even while the focus remained on riotous derisive remarks directed at bad movies. It was as if the show got a rejuvenatiing shot in the arm; so many of the eighth season shows had us laughing absolutely hysterically.

    My perception of MST3K is that the show was always generally good, but in particular had two "glory periods" (whereas most shows have just one, if that): the first one being the two- or three-year period surrounding the transition from Joel to Mike (seasons four through six), and season eight, perhaps peaking in season five and the early part of six, and the second one being season eight. After season eight, it seemed to us it fell back a bit, but its star was still bright throughout the remaining two seasons, and it remained great. In fact, the weakest point in the show's run appears to me to be the first season, when the writers/cast were still feeling their way through this show that was so different from most TV, and even that first season was entertaining at the time; it's only now, after seeing how much more fully the show lived up to the potential of the premise in later seasons and getting used to that level of keen writing, that the first season seems so rough.

  102. Buffy good? by kir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Even though it is clearly in its twilight, it's still one of the vest best shows on TV.

    I know so many people who absolutely love this show. I've tried to watch it, but it insults me everytime. I don't get it... what makes this show so appealing? I think it's garbage.

    --
    3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    1. Re:Buffy good? by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      How exactly does it insult you? Are you a vampire or something?

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  103. Re: MST3K by Golias · · Score: 1
    Being from the Twin Cities, I was actually able to watch the original KTMA episodes, before Comedy Central picked it up. They may have still been figuring out what the hell they were doing, but even then it was great fun. I'll never forget the "murderball" bit.

    The cast really came together when Keven Murphy became the new voice of Tom Servo when the Comedy Central episodes began to air. His mellow delivery really balanced the wildness of Crow.

    Anyway, my point was that the writing is what made MST3K work, and the same is true for Buffy. Cast changes can be endured as long as the writing stays good.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  104. Joss Whedon==best writer on TV by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is a bad year for Whedon, with the idiots at FOX cancelling Firefly... and now this. I was not a real Buffy fan, but I did see enough to acknowledge that the writing was first rate.

    Instead of a spinoff, I want Whedon to fight for a new home for Firefly. That was the best first season of any show, ever. But I guess the average viewer is too dumb to recognize a masterpiece.

  105. No, no, it all makes sense... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, seven *is* the magic number. Star Trek: TNG had seven seasons. DS9 had seven seasons. Even Voyager had seven seasons. Now Buffy. That's kind of frightening.

    There are always exceptions, of course. Star Trek: TOS is in syndication still, despite only having three seasons. Of course, those were 29/26/24 episodes, unlike the twenty-ep seasons we're stuck with now. It's almost like four seasons of modern TV... not even counting the fact that each ep was fifty-two or fifty-five minutes long instead of forty-two.

    I suppose it makes sense, though it puts a mean limitation on the medium. Then again, what shows haven't sucked after seven years? I haven't gotten to the last two seasons of X-Files, but I heard it got pretty dismal in the last two years...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:No, no, it all makes sense... by dtake · · Score: 1

      Last night I saw an bio-show about Bea Arthur, and her two hit shows (Maude and The Golden Girls) had seven year runs, but the decision to stop was her's. In fact, the other three "Girls" had a continuation series (Golden Palace?) that bombed badly. So maybe Bea has good series timing as well as comic timing.

      As for a good series that has lasted longer, I am partial to Law and Order, but since only three of the regulars have been there for greater than seven years maybe that doesn't really count.

    2. Re:No, no, it all makes sense... by vkevlar · · Score: 1
      As far as I know, and this is mostly from people talking about the star trek series all ending at year 7, the standard actors' contract includes pay schedules (raises, etc) covering 7 years, and then they have to renegotiate.

      So TNG ends at year 7, DS9 ends at year 7...

      don't know how much of that is true, YMMV.

    3. Re:No, no, it all makes sense... by allism · · Score: 1

      And actually, none of the original actors are currently on the show.

    4. Re:No, no, it all makes sense... by ArticulateArne · · Score: 1

      Yup. X-Files was pretty bad after the seventh season. I still think they should have ended the show with Scully pregnant, Mulder finally acheiving his wish of meeting Aliens (though he probably didn't want to be abducted), and Skinner standing there with his mouth open. But no, they had to drag it out, and it just didn't work with Duchovny gone.

      A couple of decent shows (IMHO): Sports Night, which they cut off after two seasons, has little to do with sport, but had brilliant writing, interesting characters, etc. They run it on Comedy Central sometimes; I used Snapstream to record the entire run of it a while back, and the whole show is out on DVD (only $45, too). I'm also enjoying Scrubs, Thursdays on NBC. It's generally light, fun, irreverent, and mildly insightful. Of course, YMMV.

  106. Re:On slashdot? Sure! by Piquan · · Score: 1

    Of course part of it is the fact that the show raised the "stunt" episode to a new art form. [snip] "The Body" was one of the best portrayals of the human reaction to a sudden loss of someone close.

    Joss doesn't do a lot of "stunt" writing, and when he does, he does it more as a personal challenge than anything else.

    Next time you watch "The Body", pay attention to how he uses music in that episode to provoke viewer's emotion. I'll say that it's different than most.

  107. Me too! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was merciless to my sister back during the first two seasons. Oh, I was a mean, mean brother, refusing to watch any episodes and complaining that it was crap when I saw thirty seconds of a single ep.

    Then came #buffy-unlimited on EFNet and the year or so it took me to watch all of it. Wow. My sister still reminds me that I was always a naysayer, but my doubts have seriously been put to rest at this point.

    "Acting isn't about behaving, it's about hiding. The audience wants to find you, strip you naked and eat you alive---so hide."

    Let's hope the series finale gives us everything we wish for from these characters. Although, seriously, it'll be damned hard to beat 4x22, "Restless". We'll see.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  108. Clean out the closet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its about damn time....the show was pure crap

  109. Darkness. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I think the dark thing started with 2x13--14, "Surprise"/"Innocence", when Angel goes evil. None of the major characters had had any sort of real trouble before that (closest thing was in 2x08, "Lie to Me"), and suddenly we have betrayal, pain and that blue dude getting blown up with a rocket launcher.

    Then comes 2x17, "Passion", and the show sets its standard way, way above normal TV. Damn straight. "Sorry, Jenny... this is where you get off."

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  110. TNG. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    This is why Star Trek: TNG is so popular in reruns; episodes can be shown in any order, and they make perfect sense. I remember watching it growing up, catching every episode religiously... but I don't think it would have really mattered if I hadn't. The show had tremendous moments ("Q Who", "The Best of Both Worlds", "The Inner Light", "Yesterday's Enterprise", etc etc), but didn't do the continuity schtick. Yet the characters slowly but surely evolved over the seasons.

    Was the lack of continuity that much of a hindrance?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:TNG. by billtom · · Score: 1

      I don't think that you can say that TNG had no continuity. Like the other ST serieses, TNG followed the formula of having about 5 out of 6 episodes have no continuity (the strange phenomenom of the week episodes) while the other 1 out of 6 relied on knowledge of past events to get full enjoyment out of the episode. (Not that you couldn't enjoy the continuity episodes if you hadn't seen previous episodes, but it worked better if you had.)

      Somewhat ironically, most the the episodes you cite were continutity episodes. Would "Q Who", "The Best of Both Worlds", and "Yesterday's Enterprise" work as well if you hadn't seen previous episodes with Q, the borg, and Tasha Yar, respectively. Sure, they're watchable if you hadn't, but they don't have the same emotional impact.

      Even "The Inner Light" has more emotional impact if you had seen previous episodes that established that Picard somewhat regrets trading a family for his career.

      Granted, TNG is very continuity light compared to Buffy. But it had much higher continuity than most TV drama.

  111. Sequel????? by DJ+Mc+Hugh · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's time for Scooby Doo the Vampire Slayer (who in his part-time solves mysteries) :)

  112. Re:Somewhat glad... (Dr Who) by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    They might have to take the name "Buffy" out of the title

    I don't necessarily think it's a good idea to do so, but they could use the Dr Who approach, zap Buffy with magic and voila, same character, different face.

  113. Let me just say, "Woohoo!" by Eric+Savage · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is just a post for the people who have their TiVo set to record "Best Quality". :P

    --

    This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
  114. please stop charmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i cant stand it. and the sad thing is allmost every lousy wimp i know likes it, when i ask them: "do you know buffy?" - i get the answer: "Yes, but i prefer charmed".

    wheres that LART gun? can i order it online?

  115. Buffy: Pure crap by aldjiblah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I can't believe that adults actually take the time to view this utterly midless trash.

    Hot dames tho'.

    --
    sig sig sputnik
  116. Re:Sarah Michelle Gellar is a JEW: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews? In Hollywood? Surely you're joking.

  117. heh, "to death" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mastery of language is amazing...

    Anywho, I sincerely hope the rest of your post is sarcasm.
    You're comparing mythical creatures to sci-fi concepts and movies. That's not even a valid comparision.

    In any case, I present to you with two movies to disprove your statements:

    Evil Dead (which has zombies!)
    vs
    Swamp Thing(mutation!)

  118. ok by upt1me · · Score: 1

    Thats nice, I don't watch TV.

  119. Buffy & me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Buffy the vampire slayer" has a special place in my heart - its one of my all time favourite tv series. First off, I don't watch a lot of TV series. I think I can count the ones I paid any real attention to on one hand. 'V','X-Files'(only the first two seasons), 'Startrek: NG' (I've grown to accept voyager, and the latest installment looks good but I've only seen the first episde)' & 'Father Ted'. Sure, I'll take a Frasier, Seinfeld, Simpsons or family guy if they happen to be on tv while I'm eating.. but I don't turn on the tv to watch them. If they're on, while I crave a bit of 'mind-ease', fine.

    Now when Buffy appeared on the TV, I already seen the movie long ago. My bro and I are into black humor horror flics. We love evil dead stuff, but we also watch horror movies that aren't necessarily intended to be funny, but turn out to be laughable due to their poor quality. Poor effects, idiocy amongst protagonists/victims, mindless plots.. we're suckers for that. "Buffy the vampire slayer" poked fun at horror, and we had a blast watching it. Gore, cheesy lines.. It was all there.

    I was living in Denmark when I caught the tv show.. I think I watched the disappearing girl episode then, and I was appalled. A non-violence teenage mockery of a flick I had enjoyed.. or so I thought. I think I was 21 at the time. I would chat with a fellow geek who resides in the us, who was a couple of years older than me and had been praising the series. At first I just critize the series, hardly giving him a chance to defend it. I failed to see how had gotten to attached to something which I thought was clearly intended for a much younger audience.

    Keep in mind that this was a time when shows like Xena and Hercules, not to mention countless of powerranger'ish kiddie series in fantasy settings were showing on tv. They were all a bunch of fighting-and-spellcasting escapades with cheesy effects without jokes or real character to me, and I had failed to see how Buffy was any different.

    At some point I did catch another episode of buffy and it was somewhat of a different experience. I gave it a chance, possibly due to my friends praise.. and I suddenly realized that this was actually quite an enjoyable show. In 2000 I moved to Germany to work and take a break from my studies. My family was living there as well (we've been moving about a lot), and my bro was going to school in germany. In Germany every flic and series is dubbed.. it's an indescribable horror and the very reason I was quick to convince my parents to purchase a standalone dvd player. This meant we could watch movies now and then in their original tongue. I had a decent job at the time, and few expenses so I started buying a lot of dvds when I stumbled upon the dvd installments of the buffy series.

    I decided to purchase the first season of series, partially to show my brother what we both had been missing out on (he was skeptical at the time, at best). Pretty soon we had watched the first 3 seasons - and we had enjoyed every minute of it.

    I've moved back to Denmark to resume my studies, and I am, once again, a poor student (in economic terms). This means no more dvds for me.. and especially not full feature series. I have, however managed to watch every episode up til the very last season and I no longer frown at the acclaim that the series has received. It is truly a quality tv show. Its becomes much more gloomy towards the end, wrought with death and disaster and you watch every character mature and twist by events beyond their power, but there's always the odd joke or two to keep a smile on your face.

    One of the series absolute zeniths is the 'once more, with feeling' episode that plays like a musical. Its awesome, and I still find myself humming the tunes as I go. Now, I think my bro will be visiting me soon, but I'm pretty sure I hasn't gotten much further than season 3.. so I fear he wont be able to enjoy that episode on the same level, should I show it to him.

    Pheew.. that was quite the lengthy comment.. but lemme boil it down for you:

    If you like action, horror, geekish humour with a plot that does require some dedication from its viewers, give the show a chance. Its best to see it from the beginning so buy/rent/borrow the dvds, and if you do - don't dismiss it for its "carefree start". The late seasons are gold.

    Buffy, I shall miss you.

    P.s. I've only watched one or two angel episodes. I've got a few neighbors that swear by his show.. but they're women and they think he's hot. I guess I should give that series a chance as well.. but so far it hasn't really caught me.

  120. TV is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And shows like BTVS tops the list. Get a Computer.

  121. I�m free...I�m free!!! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Finally. I thought id never be able to own them all. But at last now i can wait until all the DVDs are part of my collection. Buffy was a killerseires and it evolved great beyond its original Highschool roots. But lately it turned out to feel way constructed to make the ends meet. Whedon did a great job and now kills it off at the right point...Thank you for many great hours of tv!!!

    cu,
    Lispy

  122. Re:On slashdot? Sure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding both the (lack of meaning) of ratings and the geek contingent, there was also a story making the rounds a while back that TiVo's released figures didn't jibe with Neilson's - specifically more people were recording BtVS than anything else on TV.

    And regarding "trick" shows, The Zeppo is another favourite, though it's not as obvious as the three you mention. It's a deconstruction of the whole show to that point, really the BtVS take on Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. And of course Restless was pretty cool too.

  123. so, what comes next? by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

    Dubya the Terrorist Hunter would be appropriate, I think.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    1. Re:so, what comes next? by gomer43 · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, this stuff about Buffy spinoffs hasn't been confirmed by Joss & Co... I know he liked the idea of a Faith spinoff, but that isn't likely to happen. For now any spinoff talk is rumour only.

  124. I guess it depends on how you define "best." by LazloToth · · Score: 1

    The blonde, however, will be missed in some respects.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  125. So has everything, kiddo by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    Genetic mutations, interstellar travel, and comic book hero's have all been done to death, and been done crappily at that. The shows and movies you mentioned changed all that.

    So it was with Buffy. IMO, the movie sucked (no pun), but the show is different altogether. It's a bit soapy (drama), it's a bit comedy, it's a bit horror.

    You and the other children really *REALLY* need to get over yourselves. If you have actually tried to watch the show from a suitable entry point, and didn't like it, then fine.

    But most of you haven't. You've never seen more than a few minutes at a time, probably just when the vampire appeared, or someone mentioned 'game face', or 'dust him', or perhaps even just during the less serious parts of the episode.

    And if that's the case: STFU and learn some manners.

  126. Depends on what you call 'curves'.. by caveat · · Score: 2, Funny

    curvy sorry for the guest

    curvy (arguably)

    curvy

    NOT curvy (IMO, yours may vary - more power if they do).

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  127. S7 (and partially S6) suck by C32 · · Score: 1

    Seriously.
    The best season was #5.

    1. Re:S7 (and partially S6) suck by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      With the exception of a few very good episodes, Buffy just hasn't been as good since they left high school. That was a large part of why I enjoyed the show. It made fun of the whole high school experience. You had shallow and popularity obsessed Harmony, Johnathan, the guy who was always there but nobody noticed, there was the gay jock, the Principal who cares more about the swim team's success than the fact they're turning into monsters. And besides, who didn't think their high school was on a Hellmouth?

      It kept the momentum through the beginning of season 4 (the early college episodes), but it jumped the shark when Riley the Psych TA became Riley the Initiative Commander. It still had some good episodes in it, but it wasn't good as consistantly as it had been in the past. There was another noticible drop in quality when it moved from the WB to UPN. S7 had so much "potential", but too many bad episodes. (Wow, Xander has another evil date. That joke was old in S4.) It's still better than 95% of other television, but it's time to end the show.

  128. One was *ok* after 7 (duh) by caveat · · Score: 1

    Then again, what shows haven't sucked after seven years?

    well, the simpsons were still ok, they hit bottom around...9 to 11 i'd say.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  129. A rather unusual rape, however. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's worth noting that the romance between Spike and Buffy always involved equal parts violence and sexuality. And in particular, nearly all of that violence was her kicking his ass.

    And even before any of that, Spike did spend a certain amount of time slaughtering innocents and planning apocalypses. Their romance was able to develop despite these atrocities of a much larger scale.

    With that as history, the idea of him raping her is rather different from the usual concept. While his actions were repugnant, they weren't a huge leap from their historical method of interacting with one another.

    One could even make an argument that he may not have actually been attempting to force himself upon her in the most literal sense, being quite aware of her ability to defend herself. In the past, overt persistence on his part had repeatedly lead to her acquiescing.

    1. Re:A rather unusual rape, however. by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      Spike really didn't plan apocalypses...he helped stop Angel several times...most notably the episode where he left Sunnydale after helping thwart Angel. He drove off in a black car with the windows painted black. I laughed real hard at that one...theres something funny about vampires driving vehicles during the daytime.

    2. Re:A rather unusual rape, however. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, as per usual, he did it for the love a woman. In that case, Drusilla. He didn't want to end the world because it would mean losing her, but in saving the world, he lost her... to a chaos demon. Have you ever seen a chaos demon? They're all slime and antlers. They're disgusting.

  130. Not the Willow Show by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    I don't think Willow has been nearly the center of attention lately. A lot of secondary characters have had a lot of screen time lately (Andrew in "Storyteller" being a prefect example), but it's all about the Slayer this year. We see her changing, growing darker and angrier, descending into the abyss even more so than right after (2nd) her return from the dead.

    The "Willow changing into Warren" thing was important - she needed to move on from her guilt and grief over Tara's death, probably because like everyone else on the show, she had to undergo some self-purification before finally facing the First Evil. Andrew had to face his murder of Jonathan, Xander had to tell Anya he still loves her. If for no other reason than that they could all die soon (and they could, Joss has no compunctions about the dying).

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Not the Willow Show by Saige · · Score: 1

      it's all about the Slayer this year. We see her changing, growing darker and angrier, descending into the abyss even more so than right after (2nd) her return from the dead.

      I think it's really poing to Buffy dying at the end of the season, as she seems to be giving up in many ways, becoming convinced there's nothing that can be done to win against The First.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  131. I'd like to see Betty the corporate vampire slayer by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    Where a team of well dressed young corporate execs seek out and expose corporate fraud, corporate pollution, corporate bribes (eg to political entities), and general corporate stuffing of the masses on whose backs they stand.

    After they've busted the people and the planet - then how they going to make any money? Well I guess they don't have to be smart or forward thinking. There was a little bit around the edges in some of angel with the evil lawyers, although this is a bit lame these days. How about evil oil barons with missiles (how do we tell the difference between George and Saddam?)

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  132. "Best" show ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One must be really a total jackass to tell this is the best show he knows. It plain sucked and I'm glad they finally cut the crap !

  133. *Informative*? by Corvaith · · Score: 1

    How on earth can someone mod a post 'informative' when it contains a phrase like 'best ass shot'?

    1. Re:*Informative*? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      How could someone NOT?

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  134. Re:Me too by dbowden · · Score: 1
    Yeah -- my wife & I started watching Buffy together in the 2nd season. I can't remember why we started watching it, but once we saw a couple episodes, we were hooked. We also used to watch X-files while we were dating, but after the movie came out she got disgusted by the series and never watched another episode.

    We don't watch a lot of TV -- we've never seen any of the "reality" TV shows, don't watch "The West Wing", or "The Sopranos", but we never miss an episode of Buffy if we can help it.

    Of course, since UPN picked it up, it's consistently being preempted by local sporting events. SCREW YOU UPN! /rant

    Sorry about that -- I'd just generally rather watch an episode of an intelligent, well done comedy/drama than watch our pathetic local sports teams lose again.

    That said, I think that BTVS is past it's prime, and is heading downhill towards mediocrity. I personally think that the second and third seasons were the best of Buffy. My wife & I thought that Mayor Wilkins was one of the best villians ever portrayed. His combination of big E Evil and ordinary small town charm was sidesplitting at times. I especially recall the scene where he gave Faith (evil Slayer) a glass of milk, as he was giving instructions for an assassination, and said "There's nothing uncool about healthy teeth and bones."

    I say, Joss, kill the entire cast and keep them dead, just to show you have the balls to do it.

    While I wouldn't necessarily like such an ending, it would make a fitting end to this show. Joss has consistently tried to bend the rules, and shake up the viewers by betraying most of the Hollywood rules (good wins, evil loses, main characters don' die, etc)... If it wasn't for Angel, and other possible spinoffs, I wouldn't put it past Joss to let the evil win just one time, and kill off the entire town of Sunnydale.

    Of course, then that would open the door to a new, Anti-Slayer spinoff series. Does anyone else remember evil-Willow from Doppelgängerland (Season 3)? Rowr!

    --
    Help find a cure for Gidget.
  135. oh my.. by qoncept · · Score: 1

    I can hardly believe my eyes. I can't believe all the /. Buffy fans. Come on guys. All the time most people spend on the computer, I am too. All the time most people watch tv, I'm still on the computer. Shouldn't you be too?

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:oh my.. by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Just put the TV in the same room as the computer. Multitask, man, multitask!

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  136. Here is why by Snaller · · Score: 1

    While she is certainly an attractive woman, SMG has always been one of those Hollywood women who really needs to eat a sandwitch sometime.

    You can keep the Jenifer Garners and Calista Flockharts of the world. They're all knees and elbows. I like woman-shaped women. I like soft curves.


    As do most, a study recently (and i forget all references, believe it or not as you please) showed that 83% of males preferred curvy women with a bit of padding.
    However, consider this: The metabolism of the body change when you grow older. If you keep eating as you always have to tend to put on weight. In fact most people need to actively do something to avoid putting on weight when they grow older. Thusly, most people - on a subconscious level have tended to associate fatness with age, being older. And since TV is only being made for profit, and since advertisers prefer to target a younger audience (not that they have more money, they are just more gullible ;-) they pick actors with the starved look to get at younger demographics. (Even this doesn't always work, check out usenet sometime for just about any show and se kids bitch about how fat some of the actors are, when in fact they have a low BMI)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  137. Oh c'mon by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

    You guys are gonna bleed this pun out.

    Another bad joke like that would be a real pain in the neck.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Oh c'mon by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah a show like that would really blow.





      Damn it, I was never good at puns.

    2. Re:Oh c'mon by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, really good punning can be tough to sink your teeth into.

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    3. Re:Oh c'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anyone who would suggest a show like that isn't very reflective.

  138. if (SMG == linux_guru) { by bailout911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look out, Sarah Michelle Gellar has been referenced on Slashdot by her initials. This puts her in the same category as RMS and ESR doesn't it? I'm sure this is a great thing for linux, er, um, somehow.

    Okay, look, it's early, haven't had my caffeine yet.

    --
    --Stupid Sig Here--
    1. Re:if (SMG == linux_guru) { by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Sarah Michelle Gellar? I thought they were talking about Steve Miles Gibson! Glad I got that cleared up!

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  139. Perhaps there is hope by Snaller · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Nathan Fillion who played Captain Mal, returned to the official Fox webboard (which is still very busy) and posted a message the other day. (The cast were originally given login names by the Fox admins, and a little gavel is next to the name to indicate authenticity)

    His message is:


    Just passin' it along for y'all...

    Hello all! Hope your winter/spring has been as productive and busy as mine. I've had my nose to the grindstone looking for work. Been hanging with castmembers and remembering the "good times" as we like to call them. We are all still waiting to hear Joss' news about Firefly. He has been hard at work and keeping us all updated, it looks as though something is close! I can't wait to get those tightpants on again. I've had a little time on my hands, been able to go hiking much more than i used to during crazy Firefly hours. Visited the Fox lot yesterday to see that they have dismantled the ship. Not to worry, I'm told it can be put together in a jiffy, and the crew is anxious to do just that. Meantime, I'm auditioning like crazy, praying for a job I can love as much as Firefly. FAT CHANCE!

    I haven't been lurking for some time, so I'm not up on all the news, but just to dispel rumours, I DO have a computer, I DON'T have internet. So long, all.


    Nathan "Captain Tightpants" Fillion


    Here is the link.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Perhaps there is hope by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
      Thank you for this message. I would mod it up if I handn't already posted in the forum. Unfortunately, I don't read too much hope into the message you reposted. Basically, there is nothing like good news; only the lack of definitive bad news. Why would FOX pay to have the set taken down if they want the show to continue?

      It sounds like Tightpants is a pretty nice guy IRL and I wish him the best of luck.

    2. Re:Perhaps there is hope by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Depends upon who owns the set. If the set is actually owned by Whedon's production company, another network might have paid to take down the set and move it to their lot? (I'm no TV production genius, just a wild guess.)

    3. Re:Perhaps there is hope by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Why would FOX pay to have the set taken down if they want the show to continue?

      Well, they might need the stage for something else. But Fox is not the only option. Whedon said they had allowed him to try and sell it to others, and wouldn't block him. Perhaps another company might be interested in a few telemovies?

      Don't forget Fox owns the rights to Angel and Buffy, but they are not actually showing either of the series.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  140. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N Korea restarted a reactor which will allow increased production of plutonium for nuclear bombs, an attorney was arrested in New Mexico for claiming that "George Bush is out of control", and nation building in Afghanistan continues with the assassination of a senior government minister. But first, more on Buffy and how cancellation of the program will affect you.

  141. In keeping with the reality show theme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    some one ingenius at the studios should create real vampires, goolies and other monsters. Then they can have a contest to see who kicks ass better. The show could be called "Who wants to be a vampire killer." There's all sorts of reality TV possibilities the studios haven't thought of :)


    I'm being sarcastic.

  142. Whedon and Star Wars by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    Whedon was asked recently what movie he would like to have written and he replied "Revenge of the Jedi." (the original title before George decided revenge wasn't something jedi would do)

    How cool would that have been? No Ewoks, no warmed over Death Star plot, harder core attitude, fresh ideas. Wow.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    1. Re:Whedon and Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Leia making out with a chick while Han watches! WOOHOO!

  143. Quit while you're ahead by peterpi · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they ditched this. It's much better to stop it while there's still demand than for people to gradually get more and more sick of it.

  144. Re:Buffy who? - my TV went into the dumpster in 98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't had a tv since December 1998. It's amazing having all this extra time. You actually have to think of what you're going to do with your evenings. Of course a side-effect is not understanding what the hell so many people around me are talking about. It's frightening how thoughts and speech patterns are shaped by television and in-jokes that are tv-related and thus total gibberish for any non-tv person. "What the hell are you talking about? Is that English?"

    Another side effect is the few times I see television at another person's house, I find myself laughing at it. It seems so fake. Even CNN makes me howl. I can't even take a news anchor seriously much less their "discussion" shows. I usually can't watch more than a few minutes before squirming and walking away.

    I don't mean this as a moral statement; I used to watch tv then I stopped for 4 1/4 years. I just think it's amazing how it's affected my perception of the world. Maybe this is how people who stop smoking or drinking feel?

  145. Re:On slashdot? Sure! by LoadStar · · Score: 1
    Next time you watch "The Body", pay attention to how he uses music in that episode to provoke viewer's emotion. I'll say that it's different than most.

    Uhm. "The Body" was notable for not having an incidental soundtrack - I don't know if that's what you were referring to. This episode used the total lack of a music background to really drive home the feelings of isolation and loss. It's rather disturbing to see Buffy wander through the house in the best acting portrayals of clinical shock, all while all you can hear is the wind whistling in the background and the occasional windchime outside the house.

  146. I know im alone here but... by Cheapoboy · · Score: 1

    I like Angel alot more than Buffy, he always has the cool 'dark side' thing going on, you really dont know how he will react when things happen (like when he tried to kill Wes for kidnapping Connor, reguardless of his motives) but hey thats just me

  147. Which one did you see first? by fingerbear · · Score: 1

    With Buffy, more so that with any other show I can think of, it all comes down to which episode you see first.

    If you catch it right, you'll think you're watching the best thing you've ever seen on TV. If you catch it wrong (starting with an episode like "The Body," for example), you'll think the show is depressing and overly morbid.

    When Buffy first aired, I never watched it -- I thought it looked like some silly teen-horror-movie-turned-TV-show. I had zero interest until one summer night when I had no plans, and I was even less interested in the crap on every other channel. The first episode I saw was a rerun of that Halloween episode where they turn into their costumes. It sounds like a cliche, but it completely blew me away. I never missed another episode, and now I'm catching all the earlier ones on DVD.

    A friend recently tried to watch Buffy for the first time, and tuned in for the one where Spike was hanging from the ceiling with blood draining from his chest. It didn't make a great first impression, and I know she'll never be a fan.

    1. Re:Which one did you see first? by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      The first one I saw was "Living Conditions" (4x02). A very funny episode, but not one of the best. The next one I saw was "The Harsh Light of Day" (4x03) - A cheap Angel crossover (with Oz). The sexual humor in this episode makes no sense (and is a bit gratuitous) if you don't already know who Anya, Harmony, and Spike are.

      This lead me to the conclusion that the series was as silly as the movie. I didn't get into the show until my wife started watching the reruns on FX and got me into it.

  148. Well.... by mandesean · · Score: 1

    Actually, wouldn't the series be in its 'dawn' rather than 'twilight'? I guess it is about the slayers, though, so perhaps 'twilight' is acceptable.

    Ugg, nevermind =P Whichever way you look at, I still think the show should've been over a while ago.

  149. Been done by sckienle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I say, Joss has killed major loved characters before (jonathon, tara, gyspy teacher). I say, Joss, kill the entire cast and keep them dead, just to show you have the balls to do it.

    Been done. Space: Above and Beyond and The Others both did this when they were canceled. Of course, they didn't last a season; and they were obviously "I hate the networks" reactionary kills.

    If JW decides to kill everyone off, at least I know he'll do it well!

    --
    I don't see things in black and white; I see the gray. Heck, I actually see in color, which makes things more difficult
  150. I thought that Angel was getting higher ratings by ZipR · · Score: 1

    than Buffy this season. I don't have any source besides my thick skull, but I think that Angel's been doing better this season. Salon had some great articles about the last season of Buffy. Check 'em out before salon is gone!

  151. The show could still go on. by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the show isn't officially over. SMG just won't do anymore. It is possible (however pathetic) that the show could continue without her. It wouldn't be the first time a show has continued after the title character left. Welcome back Kotter continued after the title character left. I know there's better examples, but I'm only on my second cup of coffee.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  152. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and Buffy's ass looked sooooo good. I'm crying here.

  153. What i wish they'd hurry up and do.. by sorphin · · Score: 1

    is release the rest of the damn seasons. all of STNG was out in a year, but what about other shows? Buffy only has up to season 3 out here, and same with M*A*S*H, while over in europe they get more, if you're gonna axe the damn show, atleast put the dvds out so that those of us that LIKE the show, can see what we haven't seen yet (or watch it again), since stations like FX can't seem to get past season 5, (ok ok, they showed most of season 6 *once*, and skipped 3 episodes)...

    -sorphin

  154. Whedon's "The Fray" is a sequel. by Sans_A_Cause · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you haven't seen it, Whedon wrote a comics series for Dark Horse called "The Fray", which was basically a Slayer in the future. Perhaps that could be on tap for a sequel series?

    1. Re:Whedon's "The Fray" is a sequel. by tmhsiao · · Score: 1

      The only problem with "Fray" (note the lack of "The") is that Karl Moline is holding up issues. From rumor, I believe he took another project without completing "Fray."

      It's too bad, too, because the art was well-done, and the writing above average for what you'd expect from BTVS...

      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
  155. Blake's 7 by Aexia · · Score: 1

    What about Blake's 7? There were only 7 of them for a few episodes, and they killed Blake off after season 2.

    Blake wasn't killed off. He was "missing" and the better part of the 3rd season was spent looking for him. He turns up in the show's final episode "Blake", which is one of the best final episodes for a series ever made.

  156. The height of television programing? by Gurbik · · Score: 1

    Many buffy fans who posted said something along these lines: "BtVS is one of the best shows on tv." Yes, compared to other shows on tv, it isn't too bad. But I'd still rather jam my hands into a toaster than watch this show. My buffy review: "BtVS is as fun as it is cool" (and I mean that in a derogatory way.)

  157. Holla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't
    want
    none
    unless you've got buns, hon.

    The girl from (ugh) That 70s Show, Laura Prepon, has got curves.

    So does Sarah Chalke, from Scrubs.

  158. Re:"Spike loves Buffy" ala "Jonie loves Chachi" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you mean Scott Baio?

  159. [farnsworth]Good News, Everybody![/farnsworth] by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

    The SciFi channel has turned down "Polaris" - a series concept from Straczynski that was "too science-fictiony", in favor of "Bloodsuckers", a show about intergalactic vampires.

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  160. If you aren't wanting them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll take 'em. Both.

  161. Re:Buffy who? - my TV went into the dumpster in 98 by skisail · · Score: 1

    Are you this guy?

  162. Definite Spin-Off Candidate by Momomoto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The spin-off that everybody's chomping at the bit about is most likely Ripper (Alternative title:The Watcher), which is going to be primarily about Giles.

    Filming for Ripper starts this May, and if all goes well it will air on UPN September 2004. (Source: tvtome.com)

    --
    "Max, come over here. French-Canadian bean soup. I want to pay. Let them leave me alone." - Dutch Schultz
  163. The best what??? by tjhart · · Score: 1

    It's a sad reflection of American society when Buffy the Vampire Slayer is declared the best show on TV today...

    1. Re:The best what??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? What should be the best show on TV?

      You're right, I suppose, and it was also pretty sad when fantasy books like Gulliver's Travels and Flatland were the best looks at the societies of their day. Why can't people just learn that imagination and laughter aren't good for any truly useful purpose?

  164. Don't forget Farscape by nanoakron · · Score: 1

    Right, so that's now two of my favourite shows taking a nosedive.

    Samn TV is gonna suck for the next few years.

    Buffy and Farscape. Perfect TV.

    -Nano.

  165. ad nauseum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet!

    Dude!

    Sweet!

    Dude!

    Sweet!!

    Dude!!

  166. All bad things must come to an end by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    Yes! Wooohoooo! Fina-fscking-lee! Yeeha!

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  167. Re:Buffy who? - my TV went into the dumpster in 98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, no. I didn't bring up the discussion, I just commented on it. That guy's filled all his non-tv time talking about the bloody thing.

  168. Best show on. by DevNova · · Score: 1

    My wife and I have watched BtVS since the first episode. As far as we're concerned, it's the best written show on television. Joss Whedeon has a wonderful style and writing ability. Marti Noxon also deserves cudos for her writing. I can't think of another series that has suprised and shocked us so consistently.

    Joss loves to shake things up. He's never happy with the status quo or finding a "comfortable place."

    We will both miss the show greatly. At least there's still Angel and a hopeful spin-off. Most spin-offs are crap, but if anyone can pull off a good one (like Angel), it's Joss.

    Of course, I speak with a little bit of bias - The Alyson Hannigan Appreciation Society.

  169. Re:Buffy who? - my TV went into the dumpster in 98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having no TV is actually a lot more common than you think. The first time I ran into it was a guy at law school who frankly became my inspiration a couple years later (though being told he didn't have one when I asked him about a TV show was frankly off-putting at the time, but that's my own problem).

    The managing partner at the law firm I was last at also didn't use the thing. Unfortunately, often you just gotta say you don't have a TV or people will keep asking you about TV shows day after day.

    It doesn't make anyone some huge intellectual or morally superior person. But it does change your life.

  170. Re:Me too by Saige · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else remember evil-Willow from Doppelgängerland (Season 3)? Rowr!

    I have watched that episode on my Season 3 DVD at least 6 times - it's just a really fun episode, with a lot of great comments tossed in here and there, enough that it takes more than one watching to appreciate them all. Of course, Vamp Willow presents a lot of foreshadowing about Willow's character later on in the series.

    And the great quotes, too.. :)

    "In my world, there are people in cages, and we can ride them like ponies."

    "...and I think I'm kinda gay."

    And the good old "Bored now."

    --
    "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  171. I like The Sopranos, but... by HWheel · · Score: 1

    I think that Buffy is better since it often seems to be about one thing (outsiders, death, lesbians, monsters) but is really about something much more serious and interesting (finding your place in the world, loneliness, discovering who you are, rational and irrational fears). Many of the issues may be "teen angst" but are still meaningful for me. The Sopranos is deep but not resonant for me.

    If I have a complaint about Buffy, is that too often the monster-of-the-week is vanquished in the last ten minutes of the show (yeah, you might say formulaic), while issues are raised over time on The Sopranos.

  172. 3 Years is the minimum number by crow · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing that Star Trek (the original series) would have gone into obscurity had it not completed a third season. At least at that time, that provided the minimum number of episodes to support syndication.

    I'm not sure what the magic number is now, and there are exceptions, thanks to specialty cable channels. You can watch the one season of "Highlander: The Raven" on the SciFi Channel. You can watch the half season of "Dilbert" on Comedy Central. But for regular shows syndicated to independent broadcast stations (or for air during non-network time), I'm guessing they want a minimum of 80 or 100 episodes to avoid repeating them too often.

  173. All things must pass... by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's sad in a way, but all things must come to an end. SMG has been working 80 hour weeks on it for 7 years now, since she was 19. No matter what you do or how much you get paid for it, that's gotta wear you out. Sure, the show made SMG the star she is, but she also made the show the star it is. In the hands of a less talented and hard working actress, who knows what it would have been. I doubt we'd be discussing it here.

    Neil Youngs Law states that "it is better to burn out than to fade away", and I would so much more want to see a grandiose mindboggling finale to top all finales - and I can't see Joss Whedon going for anything less - than the heart breaking Alzheimerish multi year decline of X-Files and Xena.

    Buffy showed that you can make stunningly novel and smart TV, and have it be successful. All you need is a freakishly talented genius. Joss just went ahead and invented a new genre - the horror-comedy-action-drama-soap opera. Anyone would have told you that that is impossible to pull of. Until he proved it.

    I watch TV differently now. I still appreciate a good comedy - but why was there no acrobatic kung fu action? A good heart wrenching drama? Fine, but it could have used some side splitting laughter to spice it up. At it's best, Buffy delivers an hour that is at the same time high quality drama, comedy, action, horror and soap opera.

    Life will go on. And the half full is that all the talented people will still be around to do other work. Alyson Hannigan is very good at saying "pussy" on American Pie. Nothing wrong with that, but it's just 5% of her range. She can do anything, and I'm sure we'll see her prove that. SMG seems determined to make a name in the fart comedy movie world. I can see how she'd need a change of pace... But she'll be back in the serious acting world where she belongs in a while. Eliza Dushku, the one star to come out of Buffy in my book, can be as big as she wants to be. If she wants to spend the effort. And so on.

    And whatever Joss does after this, it will not be nothing. He's incapable of that. And it will not be boring.

    So, don't be sad. This is only the beginning.

  174. Thank God by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I know, everybody loves it. I tried to like it, I wanted to like it. it was boring, dull and predictable. Not to mention that I can not stand the stuff that SMG calls acting.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  175. FRAY by joeldg · · Score: 1

    Joss will be doing fray http://www.buffycollector.com/comics/fray.shtml If you don't know what it is, check out the link.

  176. Freddie Prinze Jr. is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and Sarah Michelle Gellar is stupid for listening to him. None of his recent performances as an actor justify his cocky, arrogant attitude. I am pretty sure he convinced Sarah that doing Scooby Doo was the best for her career. And look what a stellar movie that was.
    Here's last year's quote from Freddie:
    "I had made it clear to everyone that I wanted to play Spider-Man. I wanted to do that project so badly. Sam Raimi met with me but it was clear we had very different views of the direction a Spider-Man movie should take."
    Since when did Freddie become a director? Thank god Sam Raimi is a good judge of character. Freddie would have been horrible as the spiderman and the movie would have sucked, like Scooby.
    I think Sarah is doing the right thing by leaving Buffy since the show has ran out of steam. However, I wouldn't do any more movies with Freddie if I were her. She's a real actress where he's just a hack. I wish she would stop acting like his wife too :)

  177. The best show on television by osgeek · · Score: 1

    I ignored Buffy for years, thinking that the entire premise was just stupid. Then, FX started airing the reruns, 2 a day. I watched a couple of them one afternoon, and thought, "This isn't half bad." Before I knew it, I was entirely hooked on the premise, the characters, the writing, etc.

    Don't ignore Buffy because of the premise. You'll thank yourself if you give the show a few episodes to grow on you.

  178. Buffy is High Art. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    The psuedo-intellectualists that like to say that TV is worthless and never head the hundreds of bad symponies that were played once and never plaed again will eventaully take a look at Buffy.

    They will find a show that avoided formula, made it's own path, and actually had had their characters think.

    Unlike the X files, (where people who were trying to keep their "advanced technology" a secret routinely used that technology to kill people instead of shooting them), Buffy the Vampire Slayer had villains that were not morons and when the Hero outsmarted them, chances are you were as saying WOW what a good idea, not "DUH".

    This show taught morals and ethics, it showed the world in shades of Gray, not Black and white. It demonstrated unhappy endings and that bad things do happen to good people.

    100 years from now, real intellectualists will treat Buffy the Vampire Slayer the way people talk about the Hitchcock films. They are Classics and will be studied in Film Schools.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  179. Luuuuutefisk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The subtle pleasures of the Buffy TV show takes about 10 episodes to fully appreciate, not 10 minutes (which is all it takes to understand everything the movie had to offer).

    This disclaimer, repeated a hundred thousand times, is exactly why I never bothered with Buffy. I've heard it before. Life is too short to "stick with it until it stops sucking" for *anything* you wouldn't want in your eulogy, guys. Demand more.

    The movie was campy and didn't take itself too seriously and ended just at the right time. The show, AFAIK, is eye-rollingly earnest, takes itself more seriously than global warming, and should have bowed out gracefully three or four years ago.

  180. The name, UPN switchover, 6th season, etc. by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't really say why the series is being cancelled, but I suspect SMG is getting tired of it. This is a summary of what Buffy had against it:

    1. The silly name.
    2. The WB->UPN switchover. Neither of these networks are as widely available as Fox and the big 3, especially on satellite.
    3. The depressing 6th season. I haven't even seen all of those eps.
    4. The serial nature of the series. To get the full story you had to see the past episodes, sometimes several seasons back! I personally like that because it's not so restrictive plotwise, but it's not good for casual viewers.

    In spite of all this, it had a good run because it's an excellent SciFi/comedy/drama/horror show. Maybe the spinoff will be good.

  181. *sigh* by Tananda+Trollop · · Score: 0

    I didn't get "into" the show until season 1 came out on DVD and a friend and I watched the whole thing in 1 weekend...

    I'll be sad to see it go because Willow has always been my secret girlfirend.

  182. The creator of the show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is named Joss, not Josh, Whedon.

  183. TV is getting better one cancellation at a time. by brainchill · · Score: 1

    Now if only they could get rid of the WB completely the tv moron factor would shrink by 50%.

  184. Instead... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    You have a show where a badly dressed fat guy in his 40's exposes corporate fraud, corporate pollution, corporate bribes and general corporate stuffing of the masses :)

    Though maybe "The awful truth", with, say, Christina Ricci and $(RANDOM_EX_BOY_BAND_MEMBER) would be an improvement...

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  185. hmmmm.... by mikeb55121 · · Score: 1

    "it's still one of the vest best shows on TV."

    It just makes you want to think about how you spell
    "BEST".

  186. Re:On slashdot? Sure! by Piquan · · Score: 1

    That's actually what I wanted the reader to notice, but didn't want to give it away directly (for impact). But since the cat's out of the bag...

    At one point (in a previous episode), SMG commented to Joss that he was just going to cut away to music instead of playing out a scene emotionally. In "The Body", Joss forbade himself from doing that. He has one scene per act. He doesn't cut to music. He forces the viewer to confront the emotion that's playing out, and confront it head-on. (Source: OMWF Script Book)

    It's quite effective.

  187. Yahoo ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great they finally stop making that shit !
    Now start making something not for dumb yanks guys !

  188. There is another ... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    Dawn is Buffy. Buffy is Dawn.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  189. i'm so sad :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been watching buffy since season 1. I'll miss it.
    Rest in peace, slayer.

  190. lp by ericmc42 · · Score: 0

    last post... oh yeah baby!

  191. give Spike a spin-off! by haaz · · Score: 1

    ...assuming he doesn't die by the end of the series....

    Spike is seriously my favorite character from Buffy, even though I resemble Xander in ways often too close for my comfort. Makes a Spikey series. Or just have The James Marsters Show, in which he'd pose while decked out in leather. my wife would dig that, too.

    mmmmm... Spikey goodness...

    dooling slightly,
    haaz.

    --
    -- haaz.
  192. Good riddance ... to SMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show will be much better without a one-dimensional actor like SMG. (I suggest she sticks to comedy) Of course then it won't be called Buffy. May I suggest "Willow"? The two actors that sustain the show, after the Giles character emigrated back to British isles, is Allyson "Band Camp Girl" Hannigan and Nick Brendon. Nick is more of a sidekick type of actor, so I don't think there will ever be a "Xander" series. On the other hand, "Willow" can likely kick (or should I say, enchant) the ass out of "Charmed."
    A new series based on Faith is likely to suffer the same faith [sic] as X Files without David or Gillian or Baywatch without Pamela Anderson. It would feel so much like Buffy, fans will just watch the series waiting for Buffy's next guest appearance.
    Of course, Joss Whedon can always go for a Buffy movie set 10 years into the future. I imagine the following the opening scenario: Buffy is a washout being driven home by her successful lawyer (or dotcom-trepreneur) sister Dawn. They run into some (what else vampire). After whupping them, Buffy says, in her most Buffyesque voice, "Why is my life so fucked up!"

  193. Why the hell is this posted on Slashdot? n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  194. in other words by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The subtle pleasures of my cult takes about 10 days of fasting and sleep deprevation to fully appreciate, not 10 minutes.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  195. Yippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    officially over... and will be replaced by another bizarre cult show that will we watched religiously by legions of wierdos who will obsess about it on Slashdot.

  196. Suggestion for Sarah Michelle Gellar by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    It's sad in a way, but all things must come to an end. SMG has been working 80 hour weeks on it for 7 years now, since she was 19. No matter what you do or how much you get paid for it, that's gotta wear you out. Sure, the show made SMG the star she is, but she also made the show the star it is.

    In my personal opinion, Ms. Gellar needs to take a break from the entertainment industry for at least two years. She is already past the point of being typecast, an issue that has ruined not a few acting careers in Hollywood, especially in television.

    She's probably saved enough money to move to a smaller town far away from the entertainment industry, spend two years to get back a normal life, then start over again with a new TV series or new movie doing something completely different. That way, she can then be remembered for doing something significant in terms of acting besides Buffy: The Vampire Slayer.

  197. slime and antlers by infonography · · Score: 1
    I guess Drusilla was just horny.

    SMACK!

    I just got a slap in the back of the head for that one.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  198. Buffy fucking sucks by lowell · · Score: 1

    You guys are all crazy, almost 700 hundred posts about a stupid kid show. Buffy is/was probably the worst sci/fi/fantasy show ever.

  199. Thank God... by sorry+bugger · · Score: 1

    ... or whoever. That show, and so many others, are for the braindead. One drawback here in Germany is that they will probably re-run it to bits and then some. Oh well, won't take very much longer and I'll use my TV for target practice...

  200. Interesting... by petrus4 · · Score: 1
    I was never a huge Buffy fan, but after a while I developed an appreciation for SMG's character, as one that I could relate to on a marginal level.

    I don't know anything about whether Angel has been successful or not ratings wise, but personally I like the show for the most part. I tend to think of the show as a rather warped hybridisation of Star Trek, the Anne Rice novels/movies, and the movie The Craft. Lorne is far and away my favourite character, and the abstract (and occasionally demented) creativity of Whedon is certainly welcome.

    I don't think it's too excessively dramatic to refer to this as the passing of an era though, because although I tended to consider Buffy more juvenile than Angel, (mainly due to Willow and her attendant lameness) it always amazed me how far Whedon was able to go with what was essentially a handful of wiccan, gothic, and Catholic stereotypes, at least at first. That takes creativity and persistence, two things we don't see enough of in television any more.

    Also, Gellar might not be the greatest thespian the world has ever seen, but she definitely had guts and a a distinctive presence. In a time where more and more of what we're seeing has been recycled two, three, and four times, that also is becoming more rare and elusive...and it will be missed.

  201. Translation. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is a load of rubish but I like rubish.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  202. Spin-off by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's

    Snuffy, the Vampire Killer Killer ?

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  203. Buffy by Vambo · · Score: 1

    If Buffy had kept wearing leather, then you would have kept a bigger audience.

  204. Buffy the Vampire Slayer by billbarstad · · Score: 1

    I agree completely with the original comments. Buffy is one of the few shows I watch. Sure, it's not as hip as it once was, but it's sooo such better than dreck like "Charmed".

  205. Most overlooked possibility by jerseyrebel13 · · Score: 1

    I've always said and I will stand by the best character on the show being Oz. I feel that Seth Green is an extremely talented and entertaining actor due to his sardonic whit. Not to mention that his character would make an amazing offshoot of a show. I mean the guy turns into a werewolf for crissake!! There's that whole time that he left and sought a cure for his lycanthropy. Not to mention leaving again after coming back to learn of Willow's whole "lifestyle choice" Come on people, whose with me??

  206. tv has to look good Re:Instead... by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    I guess Peter Falk got away with that look. But I'd rather see fit, and athletic and moderately cute. After all how many tv shows are vaguely true to life now. Eg where is the bumbling inarticulate fat balding lawyer? Ah hell looks don't matter (Eg Rumpole of the Bailey), but the inarticulate does. Real lawyers like real politicians at work (not like spin city) are so dull, you'd cure insomnia with that TV. They call it "Question Time" in Australia. Victoria's parliment got a little bit titilating recently, when they ejected our olympic aerial skier Kirsty Marshall for breastfeeding her baby, in the house. The excuse was - the baby was not elected. Say what?

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.