Slashdot Mirror


Matrix Reloads to $42.5 Million Opening

Dante Alighieri writes "Box Office Mojo, the Washington Post, E!, and others reports that The Matrix Reloaded opened with a record of $42.5 million in ticket sales." I saw it yesterday and have a variety of opinions on it, but the short review is that it isn't the original, but it's pretty damn cool, and I'm first in line for Revolution.

723 comments

  1. See what happens... by Judg3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you have a somewhat accurate portrayal of hacking in movies?

    heheh

    Coincidence? Yeah, probably.

    This post... TO BE CONCLUDED

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:See what happens... by AVee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Make sure to take a look at the images here when reading that article...

    2. Re:See what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that link! i was looking all over for pics (but maybe not very hard)

    3. Re:See what happens... by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      Why would a site called 'Security Focus' ask for cookies?

      Problem in the article: First, the movie is probably set 700 years or so in the future. (based on the conversation at the end of the movie with the guy with the white beard... close as I can get w/out spoilers). Not ACE 2199. Or alternatly, the movie is set in early 21st century (the Matrix's 'present'.

      Other than that, it's nice to see a hacking sequence that doesn't make me cringe, and it's nice to see it noticed. Maybe that way, more movies will do it that way.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    4. Re:See what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or alternatly, the movie is set in early 21st century

      The hacking did take place in the early 21st (or late 20th) century, since it happened in the Matrix. Morpheus implies that the movie takes place about 6 months after Neo becomes the one (he says something like "we've freed more in the past 6 months than the 6 years before that"), which would mean the hacking may take place before the vulnerability is even known to the general public.

      Is an actual date ever mentioned in Reloaded? In the original, the "Call trans opt received" lines reveal the date.

    5. Re:See what happens... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Ahh... so SSH CRC-32 bug remains unpatched for 200 some odd years!!!

      Wow. Even the systematic machines are stupid at administering themselves.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    6. Re:See what happens... by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      According to the first movie, the current year in the real world was circa 2199. The current year in the Matrix was circa 1999 (the height of human civilization).

      Whatever that's worth.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
    7. Re:See what happens... by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      Actually, the first movie's Matrix was at 1999, so logically it would have reached 2002... so it's perfectly reasonable that Trinity, while in the Matrix, would use a program (and SSH exploit) from today.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    8. Re:See what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, that image shows that our 1337 heros are really just script kiddies, running pre-packaged exploits and just watching the printf() scroll by...

    9. Re:See what happens... by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would a site called 'Security Focus' ask for cookies?

      Maybe the server is hungry. Hell, I could go for a few chocolate chip cookies right about now myself.

    10. Re:See what happens... by teklob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, because the matrix is meant to simulate the early 21st century, therefore having the unpactched SSH is accurate

    11. Re:See what happens... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why patch when everyone who could possibly hack into the system or even bother to try is in a cozy little tank, giving you power?

      A room full of coppertops hacks nothing. That is, of course, if you have them ALL under control. And as anyone in security knows, you never do.

    12. Re:See what happens... by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      From securityfocus.com
      "But then, the film does take place in the future. Is Zalewski surprised to see unpatched SSH servers running in the year AD 2199? "

      Ugh, will someone please that author the movie is NOT filmed in the future?

      It's suppose to happening in our current view of reality, but suggests that our view is not correct, that it's really two hundred years in the future and we're just living out 1999 in a computer simulation. So that scene in the movie is happening in 1999, not 2199.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    13. Re:See what happens... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Excellent. I hadn't caught what she changed the password to (z10n0101)

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    14. Re:See what happens... by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Well, it went by too fast for me to see the password, or the ssh exploit, but I did catch nmap and ssh being used. I was also the only person in the theatre who laughed out loud at that scene... *geek*

      --
      SIG: HUP
    15. Re:See what happens... by Vagary · · Score: 1

      Where can I get the SSH version that pops up a box saying "Enter Password" and a similar success dialog? And where can I find the admin who has an interactive application automatically start when root does an interactive login?

    16. Re:See what happens... by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. For all we know, Trinity wrote sshnuke.

    17. Re:See what happens... by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

      Uhh, I don't know what ssh you use, but mine calls ssh-askpass to give a password dialog very much like the one in the movie.

      Granted, it only does this when called non-interactively (such as via alt-f2 in kde).

    18. Re:See what happens... by jrl87 · · Score: 1

      I personally don't think it really matters what year it was in either of the movies. Here is the basis for may "belief":

      Since there were 6 "ones" before Neo, that means that the Matrix was reloaded at least 6 times, and assuming that that Morpheus was right in the number of years since the beginning of the revolution (~200) that would mean that the Matrix would have been around for at least 1200 years (assuming that it took 200 years to crash every time) thus making the current year atleast 3199. However, I believe it to be much longer than this seems how the Architech told Neo he would have to choose 13 (or something close to that. *memory*) people from the matrix to repopulate the destroyed Zion. Assuming, again, that the crashes were on fairly regular intervals, and the population of Zion, it would take a lot longer than 200 years to breed a population equivilent of that which we saw in Zion.

    19. Re:See what happens... by jrl87 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, mistake in mymy numbers, all sixes should be fives, the rest of the numbers should be fine since the Matrix was loaded once without "the One," the perfect world, that crashed massively.

    20. Re:See what happens... by glitchvern · · Score: 1

      The Architech also told Neo the first (perfect) matrix failed quickly. I am not sure if he said that 99% of people choose to stay in the second matrix or if it was 99.9%, but he did say that "code" was retrieved from Neo's predecessors to improve each subsequent matrix. Also the population of Zion does not consist entirely of the desendents of the around 30 or so people choosen to rebuild Zion but also all those whose minds get freed until the next destruction of Zion. Since each matrix is an improvement over the last one, each should last a successively longer period of the time then the one before it.

    21. Re:See what happens... by MrTangent · · Score: 1

      It would have been better had she changed the password to:

      "M4TR1X0WN3D"

    22. Re:See what happens... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      It's suppose to happening in our current view of reality, but suggests that our view is not correct, that it's really two hundred years in the future and we're just living out 1999 in a computer simulation. So that scene in the movie is happening in 1999, not 2199.

      Sorry, dude, you failed.

      It's happening in 2199, in a computer simulation of 1999. Yeah, it's happening in our current view of reality, but it's still happening in the time the film takes place, which is supposed to be 2199. So, that's when it's happening. It's like if you were playing a simulation of WWII. Would the stuff youw ere doing be happening in 1942? Nope. Happening now.

      "You're looking at now. Everything you see is happening, now." "What happened to then?" "We just left then." "When" "Just now"

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    23. Re:See what happens... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I must have missed something.

      The computers Trinity hacked were part of the 1999 simulation. Ergo they were running 1999 software. Ergo all that Unix crap is A-OK.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    24. Re:See what happens... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      The computers Trinity hacked were part of the 1999 simulation. Ergo they were running 1999 software. Ergo all that Unix crap is A-OK.

      Right, right, but Trinity was in the simulation in 2199. That is when she is alive and doing shit. What the simulation is simulating is irrelevant to the fact that everything she does in the simulation of 1999 happens in 2199.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  2. It sucked by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They messed up everything. They fecked up the story line. Sure, it was cool to see them kick ass all the time, but if you remember the first movie, it was nothing like this one.. I hope the third one can make up for the loss i felt from this one.

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    1. Re:It sucked by irokitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      True, it wasn't much like the first one....But is that so bad? Wasn't it still a good movie? Besides, it has to be a hacker movie, because the Wachowski bros. don't know a sex scene from their asses!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:It sucked by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

      lol, but that was just it, they werent really into the 'hacker' thing this time, which was a shame..

      was funny to see them in ssh though.

      --
      I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    3. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should report the number of viewers attending on opening night, not the money earned. It might show a more accurate view of how popular it was.

    4. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am surprised so many people claim there was no story ...

      **mild spoilers ahead**

      1. We learn that Smith is no longer an agent of the Matrix

      2. It is possible for a 'program within the Matrix' to enter a mind in the realworld - even after it has been unplugged (Smith)

      3. We learn that the Oracle was actually a program designed by the creator to ensure 'the chosen one' gets to the source

      4. We learn that within the Matrix there is a heirarchy of power seemingly beyond the machines control.

      5. We learn that this is the sixth generation Matrix (ie. there were 5 revisions before this one).

      6. We learn that in the Matrix your choices have already been made - even if you think you have a choice - however it IS possible to choose a path that has not been defined (which is why the Matrix itself is imperfect and some people eventually 'wake up')

      7. We learn that the agents of the Matrix are not only after Neo and company .. but they are also after the rogue programs (bugs or anomalys) that are running wild within the Matrix.

      8. At the end we see Neo make a connection to the Matrix without being plugged in when he stops the Machines in the real world.

    5. Re:It sucked by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Just wait 10-20 years for Matrix Episode 1 in Holo-vision, that really will suck. The annoying Jar Jar Binks style character will walk around in front of you.

    6. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally someone else that "got it". It seems that one can sum up the reviewers and complainers into two categories. Those that got it and those that didnt.

      Either you can let the discovery of the matrix and its boundries unfold as the storytellers wish, or you are stuck wanting to have the exact same experience as the fist movie. And, if you are stuck in that rut, then perhaps this series of movies isnt for you.

      It will require some thinking and mental stretching. It wont be perfect and yet it will entertain and be provocative.

      Get over it, its not a duplicate of the first movie. Its a continuation of the story, revealed in the fashion and pacing chosen by the storytellers.

      For those that "got it". !!! Spoilers !!! you have to wonder if Neo actually can control objects in the "real" world with his mind, or are we about to discover that the matrix is actually layered and they only "think" they are "out" of it.

      One could also wonder if a physical assault on the core (not a virtual one as in "Reloaded") might be the next objective.

      Cowardly Anonymous

    7. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didn't they do bound? nothing like a bit of girl on girl action, not too bad a film either.

    8. Re:It sucked by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      They probably did the hacker love scene perfectly. I haven't seen the movie yet, but imagine you're the W brothers.

      You have 2 presumably virgin hackers. They make love for the first time. Is it gonna be John Holmes XXX style or is it gonna be clumsy and 'woops wrong hole, sorry'?

      Just imagine what 75% of /. readership's first time would be like. That scene was probably accurate. :)

    9. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 8. At the end we see Neo make a connection to the
      > Matrix without being plugged in when he stops the
      > Machines in the real world

      Hopefully in part three we don't get an ending like Akira ... although judging by the way the plot has developed it looks like Revolutions may have an Akira ending ... ... Neos powers become so great he is taken to a higher plane of existence ... and what is now the end becomes a brand new beginning ... and we are left to think whether or not the Matrix has simply been perfected and restarted ... whether the real world was actually ever real ...

    10. Re:It sucked by Dr_Auknix · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a character in one of the william Gibson novels where he could navigate the "net" simply with his mind and without a dataport ? Assuming(and this could be a stretch) that the machines are controlled by a system linked to the same systems that run the matrix, maybe neo is powerful enough to control the machines through control of the matrix ? My only dissapointment in this film, neo didn't seem to be the all powerful superbeing that he was in the end of the second. I mean sure he can fly and kick 100 of smith's ass, but in the first film, he was flexing walls and whatnot, much like tetsuo.

    11. Re:It sucked by bigberk · · Score: 1
      They messed up everything. They fecked up the story line.

      I disagree! I saw it last night, and although it was not as slick as the first one, the story was great and the action was spectacular. All it needed was some more editing - scenes shortened, sometimes cut out, irrelevant motifs dropped, etc. But if you can tolerate some editing oversights then I think you'll be happy with the plot and the way the story from the 1st matrix matures.

      Things get more interesting in this Matrix! The movie is bang-on, except a little too much bureaucroacy and domestic stuff I didn't need to see. Hopefully in #3 they can return more to that surrealistic, video game style fantasy they did so well in #1.
    12. Re:It sucked by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Hard to imagine its Trinity's first time. After all, she spent the first movie wearing fetish gear[not that I had a problem with that:')]

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    13. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would like to hear you elaborate on what they messed up. most of the people i have talked to said their only beef with the film was the first half hour or so. i however think what was shown in the first half hour, as well as the rest of the movie, was quite necessary (beside the orgiastic rave). we learned what happened in the real world since neo became the one. real world folks were practically worshipping neo as a prophet, offering him gifts and asking him to watch over loved ones in the matrix. which leads into another important theme of the movie, the different ways people interpret their reality. we encountered the mystic point of view (believing in the prophecies and neo being a saviour), the realist view (colonel locke wanting to fight the machines in battle and disregard the mystic view as fiction), and later in the movie was the opinion that our purpose is simply to feel (the meruvian (sp?)giving the hot chick an orgasm via cake along with his speech on the matter). in addition to the different trains of thought presented was the whole paradox of choice. if we have already made our decisions (or had them made for us), then do we even have a choice? also, the architect had some very interesting things to say. one of them being that reality is simply a cycle, there is no beginning and no end. i'm sure each time i watch the movie i could find something new to think about. more than once, my jaw dropped hearing these things. i know these ideas are by no means new, but this was a damn good way to bring the ideas to the masses. unfortunately, not all of us catch on. but even if a fraction of a percentage of the people who see the movie walk out of the theater thinking, doesn't that make it better than 99% of the films that are released?

    14. Re:It sucked by gstovall · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen the movie yet (waiting for my wife to get back from a trip; she's a major Matrix (and SF in general) fan); but I'm getting the impression from all the discussions that the Matrix is very reminiscent of "The Thirteenth Floor", which, despite it's miserable reviews, I really enjoyed.

    15. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that is the point. It needed a lot of editing. That is why it sucks. Don't call a bad movie good, because if edited well could have been good.

    16. Re:It sucked by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      I mean sure he can fly and kick 100 of smith's ass, but in the first film, he was flexing walls and whatnot, much like tetsuo.

      That's true. But, Tetsuo also had thos other "dwarf" kids after him to stop him, to prepare him when he finally found Akira in those frozen containers. Tetsuo didn't like what he found, and I'm afraid Neo is not going to like what's he found in the third part.

    17. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a director's cut or Euro cut of Bound? One that restores some "scenes of intimacy" that were cut from the US release?

    18. Re:It sucked by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > The annoying Jar Jar Binks style character will
      > walk around in front of you.

      Which, ahem, reminds me, why did they get rid of Dozer, anyway? Did he want too much money? Did he pull a Cripsin Glover? It's too bad because he seemed to be a fantastic actor in the first.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    19. Re:It sucked by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > the story was great and the action was
      > spectacular...except a little too much
      > bureaucroacy and domestic stuff

      There were very few WOW moments for me in this one -- the guy jumping onto the hood, Neo holding the pipe and running around in circles on Smiths' faces, and picking up speed flying to save Trinity at the end. And note that two of those scenes were shown in the trailer!

      That fight with the French guy's lackys, god damn that was boring. Most of the fight scenes in the rip-off "The One" were better than this one.

      Much of the first half of the movie, with all the "Life and Times of Zion" crap, I was actually sitting there thinking, how boring can this get?

      And who on this planet is running around thinking Jada Pinkett-Smith is hot?!?!? Sheet, I'd rather see Tori Spelling in a bikini play that part.

      And how in God's name did Smith find out Neo was talking to the Oracle? Granted, he was now a free program, much like the Oracle appeared to be, but that was a little convenient.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    20. Re:It sucked by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > we learned what happened in the real world
      > since neo became the one. real world folks were
      > practically worshipping neo as a prophet,
      > offering him gifts and asking him to watch over
      > loved ones in the matrix

      In the first one, the savior/coming of Jesus thing was somewhat subtle, and interesting to watch for. In the second one, it was slapping you in the face with a heavy flounder.

      And the rave/Saturnalia thing. While I might expect a culture that had no culture and arose naturally to have a somewhat more primitive styling, that was going a bit far.

      > the realist view (colonel locke wanting to
      > fight the machines in battle and disregard the
      > mystic view as fiction)

      Thus kicking the Holy feel of the first right in the balls. What a letdown.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    21. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you've never seen Bound, the W bros. first major film.

      Or maybe you just don't like them hot lesbians.

    22. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ah, I think your missing the point. No, it isn't the same movie. It couldn't be the same movie. The introductory phase ended with the Matrix, Reloaded takes us into a story in that established universe.


      I have problems with the movie just like I did with the first. They are both, in the end, a thimble full of philosophy and a truckload of kung fu fighting, robots and Style.


      Really, I think Reloaded stacks up against the Matrix in most ways. But I think one major and detrimental difference is that the first movie is really complete and self-contained. I think that narrative focus makes it easier to get past the cringeworthy moments, the logical implausibilities, and the comic-book action-hero cheese. Reloaded has a complete story in it (framed by Neo's prophetic dream at the beginning and it's culmination at the end), but it is unquestionably a lot about set up. I think that the fact that when the W. Bros. made the first one they couldn't be sure they would ever make the trilogy is probably at the basis of this difference.


      I think the thrid installment will complete a very solid trilogy taken as a whole. But time will tell...

    23. Re:It sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dozer died remember? Tank was the ships operator and was the one that survived Cypher's attack.

  3. action uber alles by Rubel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought that the first Matrix movie did two things well...1) had great, fantastical action sequences, and 2) messed with Neo's head and thus our heads.

    it sounds like they decided to drop the latter and concentrate on the former. too bad, but maybe they are just doing what they are good at.

    I found

    Scott Kurtz's review very interesting.

    1. Re:action uber alles by BorgDrone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2) messed with Neo's head and thus our heads.

      it sounds like they decided to drop the latter and concentrate on the former. too bad, but maybe they are just doing what they are good at.


      Imho 'Reloaded' did more head-messing than the first movie.
    2. Re:action uber alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it sounds like", well, you definitely did not see the movie, for there's plenty of screwing with the mind in it. Most of the characters from the first movie undergo some change, not to talk about the speech of the Architect and the Oracle's revelations.

    3. Re:action uber alles by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Head-Messing: To be concluded... Head-messing we could have done without.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    4. Re:action uber alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Quoting the review:

      I summed it up by comparing it to Highlander 2, the worst sci-fi movie of all time.

      If he thinks Higlander is sci-fi, he seriusly should stop writing reviews..

    5. Re:action uber alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen it yet? I would say there was at least as much head-messing as the first movie.

    6. Re:action uber alles by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the entire part where the oracle is actualy a program built to control the one and I assume so are the other "rouge" programs. and I guess you were sleeping when he visited the architect who made neo think he had a choice but in reality he did not(though the architecht could not know that neo would be able to manifest the powers he had in the tunnels which will end up being the downfall of the machines for good) from the architects POV neo was dead either way and xion would be destroyed for the 7th time in 3500 years.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:action uber alles by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I agree... don't want to give any spoilers, but if you were really paying attention there's a LOT to think about.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:action uber alles by attobyte · · Score: 1

      Yea people that say it is not as good as the first one did not understand the the whole movie. The architect prolly confused them and they tossed it to the side.

      Mike

      --
      I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

      Mike

    9. Re:action uber alles by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Funny

      The architect sounding like a lawyer reading a EULA.

    10. Re:action uber alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Scot Kurtz has proved several times in the past, with rants just like this one, that hes an idiot. I'm hardly surprised.

    11. Re:action uber alles by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Like no one knew that this was the middle of a trilogy. No one should have been surprised by that end, it's not as though the Warchowski brothers have pretended that the movie was just a two-parter.

  4. anyone else think... by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that a ceratin scene in zion where lots of skin is shown along with partying was completely uncessary and detrcted form the theme of the movie?

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:anyone else think... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:anyone else think... by RebelWebmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I didn't think that the scene itself detracted (highlighting some of the things that make us human), but the length I thought got out of hand. Good idea, but WAY too long.

    3. Re:anyone else think... by ChrisTower · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone is complaining about the celebration scene in Zion. There is of course a very good reason for that scene to be there. They are celebrating real life; the taste and smell of sweat, a real body pressing up against you, the feeling of stone on bare feet. It's real and they love it and embrace every moment of their real life. It's a good thing that message wasn't a little more transparent, they everyone would have been bitching about how obvious everything in the movie is.

    4. Re:anyone else think... by Cyph · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I think that was the most pointless scene in the movie, and from what I've read on various news sites since the release, a lot of people share the same opinion.

    5. Re:anyone else think... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was completely unnecessary, but I do think it was pretty dragged out. It would have been just as informative and not nearly as annoying had it been half as long. There's only but so much stomping and jumping around necessary to send the point across, and the "skin" portions were drawn out in such a way to tease the male audience. I don't think it should have been removed, simply edited a bit better.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    6. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (slight almost spoiler, don't read if you don't want to know) ... ... ...
      (still with us, good)

      Detracted? I don't get the complaints about that scene, complaining about it makes no sense. Prettty much ALL of Neo's motivation in this flick was Trinity. This scene is a further elaboration on WHY he is so motivated in that way. Not only that, but it was actually done TASTEFULLY.... No grunting and groaning and nastiness, it made the point WITHOUT doing anything unnecessary. Trust me, if I were to complain about ANYTHING in that scene, it wouldn't be if the scene had a purpose there, it would be more that I had to see Keanu's ass, but hey, thats just me (it was fanservice for the female geeks out there I suppose).

      anyway - I'm too lazy to log in, so please forgive the AC post

      dag _at_ daggerdesign.com

    7. Re:anyone else think... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That part felt half-baked.

      I think I got the reasoning behind the big dance, but the directors didn't explain it well enough, so it came off seeming like "let's put in a rave scene to attract the younger kids".

      If you had a bunch of humans who just came out of a big, cold evil machine; I could easily see a religion forming around celebrating your human nature: Machines are cold, logical and without feeling. You've been living a lie your whole life, but you are free today. You are a animal, and have all these wonderful carnal instincts so live it up and celebrate your basic nature now!

      You might be dead in 72 hours, so give in to the moment and get dirty and sweaty and go make out with your neighbor.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    8. Re:anyone else think... by irokitt · · Score: 1

      FUCK Yeah!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    9. Re:anyone else think... by deaddrunk · · Score: 2

      It's Hollywood. Releasing a film without people screwing in it is anathema to them.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    10. Re:anyone else think... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the protrayal of raw physical existance was a good element for the story, but I also think the scene went too damned long.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    11. Re:anyone else think... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      and the "skin" portions were drawn out in such a way to tease the male audience.

      Not just men. I talk to plenty of women who enjoyed the nude Keanu Reeves.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    12. Re:anyone else think... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Except that everyone got the message within 15 seconds, then just got bored (the sequence is also quite repetitive). By the end of the scene, lots of people in my theater (including me) were groaning and laughing, and that's not good at 10 minutes into the most anticipated action movie of the year.

    13. Re:anyone else think... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Many got that point. That point would have been more clear if the scene was shorter. However, it kept going and going, and titties kept showing up. It went from conveying the message you described to simply being an excuse to show skin.

      That, and the matrix vision cum shot, were the two most bizarre things. I could never imagine either of them being in the first movie. Heck, throw in Morpheus' speech. I squirmed when the camera zoomed around as he talked about "shaking this cave of earth and steel." Cheesy.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    14. Re:anyone else think... by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


      Too bad that they didn't film it better, so it didn't look like a bad rave mixed with leftover Planet of the Apes set knockoffs.

    15. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I think they should have shortened the erotic dance so that the philosphical mumbo could have been lengthened with a touch of more cars flipping over.

    16. Re:anyone else think... by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      I think it was not only necessary, but added to the spirit of the movie.

      The movie isn't about philosophy or hacking, martial arts or firearm savvy. It's about man overcoming. It's about the unknown regions of human behavior. That scene not only accentuated that, it beautified the entire notion.

      For once, try thinking of a wanton show of human skin to be an example of the beauty in human behavior. It may help your thinking in many walks of life.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    17. Re:anyone else think... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      They are celebrating real life; the taste and smell of sweat, a real body pressing up against you

      But you could feel the EXACT SAME THING in the Matrix for only $2.95 per-minute (it is a 1-900 phone number right?).

      Go watch the first one again, specifically the scene in the restaurant, talking about eating steak... Yes, if the only thing in life was sex, drugs, and rock and roll, they would all be much more happy in the matrix than the real world.

      I personally haven't see it yet, and don't really plan to. I've previously heard about plenty of product placement, and now some moronic sex scene that brings down the movie a notch. Add to that the reviews that say the movie wasn't very good, and I'm just not interested in seeing it at all.

      Don't like my attitude? Blame George Lucas, as well as all the other hollywood idiots that have ruined just about every other potentially decent movie in the past few years with stupidity, gratuitousness, annoying product placements, and all the other crap that is no becomming accepted... Screw it, I'm subscribed to Netflix, there are TONS of movies I can rent from more than 5 years ago, when this kind of thing was far more rare, and at least attempted to be subtle. Hey, three cheers for the MPAA, I don't even need to bother with P2P, maties!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:anyone else think... by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      I think I got the reasoning behind the big dance, but the directors didn't explain it well enough, so it came off seeming like "let's put in a rave scene to attract the younger kids".

      It wasn't a rave....it was a Stomp! concert!

    19. Re:anyone else think... by debrain · · Score: 1

      This may act as a spoiler, for the uninitiated. :)

      I agree that the skin-dance scene felt incomplete. But I also believe it was intended to show value in human existence beyond function, to show life as valuable in and of itself, as opposed to the machines who have a very "cause and effect" existence.

      Although the dance may be interpreted on some sublime level as necessary for our psyche and happiness, I am not bound to that belief, and I think it was the point of that scene to show that our organic existence has some higher meaning beyond survival, in turn giving providing the reason and wherewithal to survive where the machines would not.

      That's a very philosophical interpretation, but I think the brothers meant for the movie to have such a perspective for certain members of the audience to reflect upon. As such, I felt the skin-dance scene played an important part in producing the deep-thought aspect of the story.

    20. Re:anyone else think... by spoot · · Score: 1

      That entire scene was just embarrassing. I felt embarrassed for the filmmakers, I wanted to hide. The entire "rave in Zion" scene was just embarrassing. Oh my god... awful.

    21. Re:anyone else think... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      that a ceratin scene in zion where lots of skin is shown along with partying was completely uncessary and detrcted form the theme of the movie?

      Ah, I suspect you missed the point. I, like many others, watched the scene turn into a rave -boring after about fifteen seconds. Once I realized they were going to play the entire dance track however, it was the perfect opportunity to deal with the cause/effect of a couple pints before the movie.... LOTR was not near as forward thinking.

    22. Re:anyone else think... by crashnbur · · Score: 3, Interesting
      On that note, the review that I haven't finished yet ends with these words (for now):
      The original was a 10.0 -- I had seen nothing better and I expect nothing better. Reloaded takes us deeper down the rabbit hole and is, in nearly every respect, a better movie than the first. However, two things detract from the sequel's perfection: (1) it's a sequel, thus it can not stand alone; (2) I can imagine no reason why the orgy scene was so long or even why it was included! Those things, and I'm not sure, but I think I wanted to see more of the Twins than I did. When all is said and done, Reloaded gets a 9.7.
      (And for the record, on my movie-review scale, only the two Lord of the Rings films and The Shawshank Redemption have come close to The Matrix -- it is incredibly difficult to get a 9, as it is the same as 4.5 out of 5 stars.)

      Simply stated, the orgy scene should have focused much more only on Neo and Trinity, and it should have been about three minutes shorter. Still, I'd guess that the Wachowskis' goal was to show the primal nature of Zion's inhabitants, and, well, mission accomplished. I just don't think they needed four-and-a-half minutes to do it. (Indeed, the fact that they gathered in a palace of rock and cheered at Morpheus, their faithful "leader" [demagogue], said enough to me about their culture.

      Andy, Larry? Feel free to explain yourselves. I'm certain that the Slashdot crowd would love your input...

    23. Re:anyone else think... by smbober · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, I did think. The first movie was great due to the fact that there were many parallels between Neo and Christ, Morpheus and John the Baptist, etc. I really loved the movie. Now, in the reloaded, you have Morpheus giving what amounts to be a sermon followed by what amounts to be a rave/orgy. I thought that the writers of the trilogy might be drawing on Messianic themes in order to subtly send a message. Now, with rave/orgy scene introduced, I am much less sure of any subtle message and am, frankly, disappointed. Finally, the love scene between Neo and Trinity was also unnecessary. If it was implied or, better yet, hinted at, I would be fine. But, it wasn't. Did I mention that I am disappointed?

    24. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you!! some one else who thought that that scene was crap and complete gratuitous nudity...they just put it in for an 'R' rating. It would have worked just fine if they went right to Neo & Trinity waking up in bed >.*

    25. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they just *think* they are in real life. Zion is just a meta-level to the Matrix. Neo and company can't win, it is all pre-determined because they are inside an even bigger computer system.

    26. Re:anyone else think... by ChrisTower · · Score: 1

      I'm still amazed that everyone is bitching about hot dancer in see-through tops grinding all over each other. Not to mention that I was spliced with poor little Trinity getting treatment from "The One" and his "One". They were cover in plugs I tell you, PLUGS. I was quite disappointed that they didn't try to lick or penetrate any of the plugs; that would have been hot.

    27. Re:anyone else think... by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was long, but it emphasized a big important philosophical element: machines are boring! Machines can't enjoy life, and there's nothing enjoyable innate to them. The scene showed that humans are emotionally rich by their nature; sex and dancing are fairly low-level things but they shape us in important ways, and they have *meaning* that goes beyond their raw definitions. In other words, we were shown that humans know how to have fun. This is important because, within the Matrix, humans and programs (=machines) often appear identical.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    28. Re:anyone else think... by Build6 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Absolutely. It didn't have to be that long. And... there's totally no shortage of nipple-viewings available in this world if you want to see nipples, and to have it this repetitively in the movie just ... cheapens the whole thing.

      Another thing I feel problematic about the rave scene is the music. While I was watching (and listening) I found myself thinking "this sounds nice" + "they definitely made this with soundtrack CD sales in mind" - which is unsurprising (hey show me the $$), but this being the future (since this is in Zion and thus the "real" world plenty-hundreds-of-years further on, not the "current-time-period" world within the Matrix), why does it sound so similar to "current" music? I think this is a problem with all situations where "future-music" is necessary in a movie and it is yet another reason why a need for such should be kept to a minimum (i.e. the scene was too bloody long).

      Think about how different current/modern music is from that of just 50 years ago, much less that of hundreds of years back. Yes, we still have classical-music aficionados, "traditional" rock-n-roll fans etc. (and not all of whom were from "those eras"), coexisting with trance-rave-electronica people in this day and age, but I would say the "sound" of this generation is more the latter than the former? (While, say, in the '80s it was big-hair rock/metal bands :-).

      Is it supposed to mean that rave/trance is going to be the basis of music from here on down? Or is it that they expect most mainstream audience members to never have heard any rave-parties before and so find it all "fresh and exciting"?

      Anyways, I can't think of that many movies where the music of the future "fit", and the ones that did, the music was "background", i.e. "for us" and not "what the characters were listening to". Blade Runner's Vangelis soundtrack?

    29. Re:anyone else think... by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, maybe they were trying to give you a hint that zion is actually babylon.

    30. Re:anyone else think... by debrain · · Score: 1

      Also, maybe they were trying to give you a hint that zion is actually babylon.

      Or Iraq ...

      (Cradle of civilization and all ...)

    31. Re:anyone else think... by Commutative+Monoid · · Score: 1

      The people that populate Zion are either recent-descendents of people that have escaped a 20th century Matrix, or escapees themselves. This is the culture that has been inprinted upon them. If anything, the industrial look of Zion is more out of place than predominately drum-based dance music.

      --
      You have exactly 314 seconds to come up with a less retarded plot.
    32. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the crowds of people resemble the army of machines coming to get them. The rave scene was *not* gratuitous. When I watched it I was thinking, "everyone is going to complain about this scene for sure," and just shook my head. What most of you wanted was the first movie again. I am glad the Matrix Reloaded is better because I did not like the first movie that much. The only thing I don't like about Reloaded is that it cannot be viewed by itself because of the stupid "to be continued" ending.

    33. Re:anyone else think... by boa13 · · Score: 1

      You call that mild dance an orgy? LOL!

    34. Re:anyone else think... by boa13 · · Score: 1

      I liked to see their punctured skin. Not that I find this appealing, but it gave me any idea of how much they can be a constant reminder of one's Matrixist past. You can't really forget the war you're in with them everywhere on your skin...

    35. Re:anyone else think... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Glad I wasn't the only one.

      Do you suppose it's a rating issue? The movie was rated R, and couldn't be dropped to PG-13 while still including everything they wanted to include, so since it's rated R anyway, they felt they needed to add more boobies to make it a more solid R?

      On another note, where can I find the recipe for that chocolate cake?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    36. Re:anyone else think... by vandemar · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point, especially since Nebuchadnezzar was the name of one of the kings who ruled in the original Babylon. And if the matrix-in-a-matrix scenario actually is the case, then it would all make even more sense. Zion, the Judeo-Christian (and Rastafarian?) city of freedom, turns out to be Babylon, the place of Israelite exile and captivity.

    37. Re:anyone else think... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to pipe in here real quick - don't let the reviews discourage you too much. I had the same type attitude as you do now before some friends drug me to go see it last night, and my opinion completely reversed itself during the course of the movie. It's true that there are a number of scenes that are left running just too damn long, but on a whole, it's actually a pretty good movie.

      The rave scene runs too long, but the sex part of it isn't gratuitous sex just to have sex scene (well outside of the breasts, that part was pointless), it was supposed to convey the passion between Neo and Trinity, it's just that the whole sequence was poorly edited and comes across as emotionless

      As for product placement, I really didn't notice it if it's there. For example, there's a scene involving motorcycles, and I happened to notice that the bike had "Ducatti 996" decal'd on it, but that's only because I have an interest in bikes to begin with. The movie's not perfect, but it's far from a sequel that was made only to exploit the fanbase - it's a sequel made to continue the story.

    38. Re:anyone else think... by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Cum shot eh? I thought it was more of an orgasm. You could make some serious money with a recipe like that.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    39. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That, and the matrix vision cum shot, were the two most bizarre things. I could never imagine either of them being in the first movie.
      LOL! That was hillarious. Glad to know I wasen't the only one who saw that.
    40. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Machines can't enjoy life, and there's nothing enjoyable innate to them.

      Really? I think you missed the point of this movie...Most people seem to have actually. The "rogue programs" that are roaming the Matrix are good examples of why your contention is wrong, seeing as they engage is complex, capricious, and emotional relationships with one another...They enjoy life, and don't want to "die."

      >sex and dancing are fairly low-level things but they shape us in important ways, and they have *meaning* that goes beyond their raw definitions

      Again I ask, really? And if I were a sentient being from a race that didn't possess a sense of hearing, and I reproduced by budding(a process by which a piece of the original organism's body breaks off and grows into a fully formed adult), what "*meaning"* would I ascribe to dancing or sex? I'm not arguing that human biology doesn't shape us, but your contention that it bestows upon us some kind of inherent superiority or makes us uniquely important is bogus.

      >This is important because, within the Matrix, humans and programs (=machines) often appear identical.

      What are the salient differences?

    41. Re:anyone else think... by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      There is of course a very good reason for that scene to be there.

      Correction, there is a very good excuse for that scene. They could have made a Zion-celebrates-life scene (and for what it's worth, I'm glad they gave us one) without making it look like MTV. Could have, but didn't.

      Now, I'm not generally against seeing nipples through sweat-soaked clothes, but in this case the presentation wasn't an artistic decsison, it was a marketing one. The same can be said for much of the film.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    42. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the reason to have a scene like that was good.

      the scene itself sucked.

      stupid rave like scene, i guess to appeal to the young folks.

      i saw the movie with a bunch of kids.

      they thought that scene was gay.

    43. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason for this a set up for a scene with Keanu's butt, so a girlfriend you dragged to see the movie doesn't feel left out and has something to smile about.

    44. Re:anyone else think... by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      In all honesty, I think that people are a little uptight about product placement these days.

      Sure, the motorcycle had a brand decal. Most do. In fact, it would be more unrealistic to have a bunch of motorcycles without any sort of brand decal than a bunch of motorcycles with the same decal.

      The Matrix movies are very good about this sort of thing; there's no really obvious brand promotion (except perhaps "Zion Foundry"), but at the same time, the Matrix looks like the real world, brands and all.

      Also, I would like to commend the Wachowski brothers for acknowledging the existence of computers that aren't Macs. No offense to Macs.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    45. Re:anyone else think... by The+Magic+Yak · · Score: 1

      That's funny because that's exactly the message I drew from it. A celebration of the self. The orgy symbolized the worship of one's body. It was much more demonic than angelic. I'm no movie writer, but..... I was so disappointed by the plot of this one. The first Matrix was good, and arguably even could be linked to Messianic lines. But this one shattered that image for anyone with an inkling of what Messiah is. I loved the action scenes, but why the sex scenes and the love stories? I watch movies for action because I don't have that happen in my life. I guess I don't like watching movies with love stories because I experience real love in the real world and find it uncomparable in the movie.

      Sorry to rank, but they could have done a better job on this one! Was it obvious the Matrix is really within another Matrix? I would have loved to have Neo decide to go commando and defeat the computers but establish himself as God (or what he beleives himself to be), making both man and machine subservient to him. Kind of end on a down note (that being the hopeful figure Neo has now chosen self over others). Build up the sequel and have a better (preferably unknown) actor defeat Neo, save the universe, blah blah blah....

      Then again what do I know...not much....

      --
      Bill, can you factor this prime number for me?
    46. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you view the 5 best movies you've ever reviewed as:


      Matrix 1
      Matrix 2
      Lord of the Rings 1
      Lord of the Rings 2
      The Shawshank Redemption

      Instead of writing reviews, you should be taking the time to learn more about movies.

    47. Re:anyone else think... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2, Insightful
      SPOILERS!!!!

      It's not a 'matrix-in-a-matrix', it's that Zion and the recurrence of The One are just as integral to the stability of the matrix as the power pods themselves. It's an outlet for the 1% of humans that don't accept the illusion; the ones who must have their power of choice. But Zion is a very real threat, so the machines have to periodically sweep it clean to keep them from actually overrunning the place. What the Archicet and the Source were supposed to get out of Neo, what the 'code that he carried' was all about, I couldn't quite figure out.

      Other than that, your analysis is quite good. Humans escape from one invisible enslavement and end up nowhere but right in another, even more invisible one.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    48. Re:anyone else think... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "Not just men. I talk to plenty of women who enjoyed the nude Keanu Reeves."

      Are you sure it wasn't his outstanding acting and witty dialog, with such memorable quips as, "whoa", and "huh?" that they were enjoying?

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    49. Re:anyone else think... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the Wachowskis insisted on not cutting that scene short. I'm sure they have their reasons.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    50. Re:anyone else think... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no they weren't. Didn't you watch the movie to the end? That was in the Matrix. Ooh, big surprising plot twist! (/makes wankie motion)

    51. Re:anyone else think... by mithras · · Score: 1

      Actually, my girlfriend and I both were digging on naked Trinity.

    52. Re:anyone else think... by Paradigm+Lost · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the Wachowski Bros. first movie Bound?
      Clearly these guys like Sex and Violence, and for these sequels they've been given a free hand (Just watch where they put it).

      --
      -Dead Lesbian Witches! Think about it!
    53. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that the matrix vision cum shot was put in as counterpoint to the orgy/rave. The idea being that programmatically induced pleasure in the "fake" world of the Matrix is as genuine or maybe even more genuine than the allegedly human pleasure in the allegedly "real" world of Zion.

    54. Re:anyone else think... by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      it came off seeming like "let's put in a rave scene to attract the younger kids".

      well since it wasn't in the trailer and most people didn't know about it, and oh yeah, it got the film an R rating...
      I think your theory is pretty well shot to hell.

      there was a message in that scene, you just missed it.
      that scene was there to show what we will still have if we destroy all the machines.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    55. Re:anyone else think... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      So Zion is a Honeypot of sorts....

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    56. Re:anyone else think... by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      I think the actual music they were listening to was the people playing the drums and various instruments that you heard at the start of the dancing. It became overlayed at some point by some techno for our benefit, but I didn't take that to be what *they* were hearing.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    57. Re:anyone else think... by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      Anyone else think that a lot of these people with that same opinion, just don't dance? Don't get on down with their bad selves? Don't shake their booty to the beat?

      Somebody ain't feelin the funk.

    58. Re:anyone else think... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > ? And if I were a sentient being from a race
      > that...reproduced by budding, what "*meaning"*
      > would I ascribe to dancing or sex?

      I've often wondered if salmon pornography would involve pictures of eggs instead of females.

      Would make a good Farside cartoon.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    59. Re:anyone else think... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      The animal dances were certainly not part of the world most of the Zionites came from.

      Evidently the major export from The Matrix are not nerdlings (Morpheus' crew is thus the exception rather than the rule) but California actress/model/spokespeople/waiters.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    60. Re:anyone else think... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Who was the girl in the cake scene anyway?

      She looks like the love child of Traci Lords and Jaime Pressly. (Which, of course, would be a good thing, as would watching the union that created such a creature.)

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    61. Re:anyone else think... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Hah! My wife (who wanted to come) said exactly the same thing! The Neo/Trinity love story was there for all the girlfriends who got drug along to this movie.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    62. Re:anyone else think... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I thought they took out all the disks. I understand the symbolism of it, but yeesh.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    63. Re:anyone else think... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Oh, agreed. I wasn't saying that the bike saying Ducati was a bad thing - only that I noticed it, and that I only noticed it because I cared. Kind of like the freeway scene with Trinity driving the XLR and the twins in the Escalade. Come to think of it, the only places I can think of any "Product Placement" are the highway scene - and those were all cars/bikes. And hell, if you're gonna destroy a $50,000 car, might as well destroy the $50,000 car you're being given for free, right? :)

    64. Re:anyone else think... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      That or it got mixed, generally at raves they have two turntables and try to fade between songs if not mix two songs together entirely for a new song from various frequency channels of the two.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    65. Re:anyone else think... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      She reminded me of the Woman in the Red Dress from the first movie. It would be amusing if it turned out to be the same actress.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    66. Re:anyone else think... by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Not just men. I talk to plenty of women who enjoyed the nude Keanu Reeves.

      I thought that was one of the fully CG scenes...?

    67. Re:anyone else think... by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      According to Georgia law, an "orgy" is three shoeless people in a closed room. (It is the shoes!)

    68. Re:anyone else think... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought for sure it was her again.

    69. Re:anyone else think... by seth_k · · Score: 1

      Geeky trivia: Zion's population (250,000) is the same as Babylon 5's.

    70. Re:anyone else think... by mskfisher · · Score: 1
      sorry, different women:
      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    71. Re:anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your theory is pretty well shot to hell.

      Hey kid, did you even bother reading the rest of his post?

      Or do you just jerk your knee in response when you read first few words in a post?

    72. Re:anyone else think... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how much ethinc musical genres across europe and the middleast have in common. The rythm patterns also have loads in common with tribal rituals from other continents. There's a common instinctual layer in our music that hasn't changed since humans dwelled caves so why sould it happen in the Matrix future?

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    73. Re:anyone else think... by Build6 · · Score: 1

      I've read how archeologists found old bones with holes carved out in them such that they formed crude flutes, and that the notes they would have created would be in the pentatonic scale... and mathematically an octave is a halving of the freq of the wave, so I guess there's really no doubt there's some kind of - whether rooted in auditory-organ biology or Laws of Physics - common basis for all music.

      And if it's a question of reversion to "animal" primitivism during the Zion celebration I can understand if the music was what would I guess be commonly termed "tribal". But during the scene it just sounds so entirely "20th-century-E-rave" ...

  5. There's a new Matrix movie? by sandbagger · · Score: 5, Funny

    First I've heard of it.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:There's a new Matrix movie? by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      It's the second I've heard of it. Deja vu?

    2. Re:There's a new Matrix movie? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Have you been living in a dream world?!

    3. Re:There's a new Matrix movie? by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1

      What is the matrix anyway? :P

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    4. Re:There's a new Matrix movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsweek had a cover story about it a few months back - about a three or four page spread. They explained that Reloaded and the final in the trilogy would be six months or so apart.

    5. Re:There's a new Matrix movie? by u38cg · · Score: 1
      I only watched the Matrix for the first time today. I'm getting dragged to see it by some damn female some time next week, so I thought it would probably be polite to have some vague clue what it was all about.

      It was better than I thought it would be, but too much cheesiness and gratuitous special effects. The first director to make a sci-fi film with no SFX will get my vote.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  6. Is this supposed to be surprising? by funkmastermike · · Score: 1

    The Matrix was good.
    Sequel is then announced.
    Sequel is in theatres and people see it.

    Hardly surprising it would rake in the dough given all the hype. The Matrix is simply a good movie [trilogy(?)]. Hard to say that about most of the filler that comes out.

  7. I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Funny

    [minor spoilers]

    I saw Matrix last night, but it seems that the silly folks at the theater lost the last 5-15 minutes of the movie!

    One second, we were watching Neo and the other dude on the table, and then all of a sudden the movie abruptly said "To be continued", and went straight switched to the credits!

    Where's the conclusion? I'm out here hanging in the wind! Half the audience was booing...

    Argggg!

    [/minor spoilers , but I think it's fair to warn people about the ending to this movie so they're not dissapointed]

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      That seems to be a trend in certain part-of-a-series movies lately... Many filmmakers seemingly fail to understand that the middle movie needs to stand on it's own -- maybe this comes from treating the whole as a single big money-making enterprise rather than as making *movies*.

      A good counterexample is Empire Strikes Back. Sure, it set up Jedi, but it definately had an ending (which, IMO, stands as one of the all-time great endings in movie history). It's too bad more films don't follow that paradigm.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by kfx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One second, we were watching Neo and the other dude on the table, and then all of a sudden the movie abruptly said "To be continued", and went straight switched to the credits!

      Where's the conclusion? I'm out here hanging in the wind! Half the audience was booing...


      ** WARNING! SPOILERS! WARNING! SPOILERS! **

      That's known as a "blatant cliffhanger"... and I have to agree it really sucks that they do that, any movie should wrap things up and start a new part of the plot in the next movie, instead of just cutting it off in the middle like that.

      Overall I thought that the movie was really slow to get started... Some of the scenes seemed really drawn out and nothing important really happened. Then, when it was starting to get really good with some plot twists, it was suddenly over.

      And for the record, it said "To be concluded."

    3. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by Babbster · · Score: 1

      This argument against the movie I just can't understand. Anyone exposed to the entertainment media (meaning just about everyone, and certainly people going opening weekend) knows that the third movie is coming out by the end of this year so a cliffhanger was inevitable...It's like booing the ending of Fellowship of the Ring.

    4. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by dJCL · · Score: 1

      SPOILERS.....
      I know most don't really get it... The conclusion of this movie was that they failed to protect Zion. There is a "we are fucked" ending going on there, and then... something happens(I had to explain what that meant to way to many people) and that readies us for the next movie.

      I feel that this movie was totally complete, and I loved the Rave scene, It let you know that these were HUMANS they were fighting for. We want those people to live. And in the end, it doesn't really matter...

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    5. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      PS For the record, I enjoyed the movie, and will see it again. The action was spectacular, the ending was annoying... but at least it's only 6 months until the next one.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    6. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by dagnabit · · Score: 1

      Longest.Trailer.Ever.

      That's the first thing I thought of at the end, as the 45-minute credits scrolled by: that was nothing more than a kick-ass setup for Matrix Revolutions. I sure hope the finale pays off. (I'll be in line to see it regardless though!)

    7. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got out of the theatre...

      I LOVED the first Matrix.

      YOU DONT NEED TO GO SEE THE SEQUELS, what was good in the first was the kick-ass story and effects.

      The "Matrix:Reheated" is just about the same without a story. a Pretext to tons of long boring combat scenes, with the same effects that were entertaining the first time but are NO LONGER after 100 minutes of the same.

      Also that stupid pretext of a film finishes with a "To be continued..." leaving a bad taste ...

      i will definitely skip any future Matrix:whatever

    8. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

      One second, we were watching Neo and the other dude on the table, and then all of a sudden the movie abruptly said "To be continued", and went straight switched to the credits!

      Where's the conclusion? I'm out here hanging in the wind! Half the audience was booing...


      It wasn't really that bad of an ending though... It probably would have been slightly better if they had cut it a few minutes earlier, right after Neo zapped the machine, but then it would have been hard to start the next one explaining that he was in a coma. It's not exactly strange to have a middle chapter in a series end in a failure like that. If they'd just ended it without the message at the end, people wouldn't be that pissed off.

      They ended the major plot pieces of that movie, and then took a few minutes to set some stuff up for the next movie.

    9. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by djward · · Score: 1

      Well, if the next one was coming out in another 3 years, I'd agree with you, but since it's coming out in November - nearly back-to-back with this one - I think a cliffhanger is quite appropriate.

    10. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by dwdyer · · Score: 1
      then all of a sudden the movie abruptly said "To be continued"

      No.
      It said, "TO BE CONCLUDED." Very important difference there.

      -W-
      --
      -dwd-
    11. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      *SPOILERS*

      What messed me up was that I didn't know if the machines destorying Zion were actually happening or if it was another of Neo's dreams/visions of what might happen..

      I need to look over a copy of the script, but I also remember being confused as to the failed counter-attack took place "at" Zion or away from it at one of the "important" points they were talking about.

      So I was left with a really "huh?" as to if Zion is gone or is about to go...

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    12. Re:I got robbed! [minor spoilers] by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

      To be concluded??? Doc Brown is in 1885! Can't wait to see the sequel!

  8. Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by methangel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know about everyone else but, Reloaded basically told everyone that the first movie was bullshit.

    I was disappointed with the villain development (there wasn't any.)Some of the fight scenes were totally unecessary, especially the replication scene. Neo just supermans his ass out of there after exploiting all of the latest filming techniques.

    Revolutions better fix things up or I'm going to be a very sad panda.

    1. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

      Totally agree, it just didnt 'do it' for me like the first one did.

      --
      I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    2. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Bob+Hellbringer · · Score: 1

      Overall I liked this movie. It just felt colder and more distant than the first one. Then again, I was pretty far away from the screen and way off to the side! :) Really though, they just threw a lot of stuff at the audience and left a lot hanging. This movie was definately a build-up for Revolutions. I do agree about the villians, though merovingian & company were pretty cool. Hopefully they makes a come-back. I also think that the directors (can't spell those names!) may have been a little too caught up in their technological triumphs.

      --

      - i fart in your general direction -

    3. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by MunchMunch · · Score: 1

      Reloaded is being held up to so many different expectations and everyone is so ready to be a critic that its impossible to satisfy anyone who goes into the theatre with even a modicum of self-consciousness about seeing the film.

      Comments like how certain parts were "unnecessary" just confuse me--necessity is a virtue of efficiency, not necessarily of good film making. The replication scene was the most talked about and hyped up before the film, so I'm not surprised it was what you criticised most--and to be sure, even I noticed that I was treating it with skepticism. But it was unfair skepticism, feuled by how much hype I'd read in Wired magazine.

      My advice: Just forget about the politics of the film and "suspend your disbelief"!

      I agree with the post earlier--Most people are too jaded and skeptical going into the movie to walk out satisfied. I mean, do the critics have valid points? Perhaps. No offense intended to them. But I wouldn't know because I was too busy watching the movie, not looking for a thesis.

    4. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      No it didn't. It reminded us that we need not take the "truth" for granted if we can not be absolutely sure of it.

      "The Matrix can not tell you who you are."
      "But an oracle can?"
      "That's different."

      One purpose of the second movie was to force Neo (therefore us) to reconsider that thought -- maybe the Matrix can tell us who we are. Obviously, Neo seems convinced by everything the Architect, Oracle, Agent Smith, and everyone else has told him. He's still following the logic that he learned to use within the Matrix. But he's also proven to be unique in that he does not do what he is "programmed" to do. He is making his own decisions. If what the Architect said was effectively true, then Neo's purpose is to be the anomaly of anomalies -- to trule be "The One" to bring down the Matrix.

      Of course, there is a problem: how do you save the billions of humans hardwired to the Matrix?

    5. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      EEP EEP EEP

      SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS

      EEP EEP EEP

      > I don't know about everyone else but, Reloaded basically told everyone that the first movie was bullshit.

      Yes, and no. Its the meta-matrix. And this time there is no meta-morpheus to tell us just what the meta-matrix is, so we'll obviously have to find out in the third film.

      > I was disappointed with the villain development (there wasn't any.)Some of the fight scenes were totally unecessary, especially the replication scene.

      Ummm, I think you should recall the conversation that Smith has with Morpheus regarding Viruses. Note also that from this film we have the irony that Smith would not have escaped the matrix had he succeded in the first film; he would have been deleted as the keymaker would have been by the agents.

      I think the organic quality that the machines are starting to take on is absolutely critical to the development of the film. The scene with Neo and the Councillor talking about the interdependance of humans and machines, Smith's evolution, the fragments of programs operating at the fringes of the matrix, the symmetry between the images of Zion (and the images of the Fields of humans, (a physical prison vs. a mental prison, of sorts).

      The first film was about (among many things) what is real, this film goes more towards the problems of what distinguishes machines from humans.

      > Neo just supermans his ass out of there after exploiting all of the latest filming techniques.

      You were expecting a tea party? They essentially did the same thing in the first film.

      > Revolutions better fix things up or I'm going to be a very sad panda.

      No, I like leaving the movie with more questions than answers, just like in real life. I'm still working on whether to believe all of, some of, or none of what the Architect said. I don't think that there is sufficient information in the film to make my decision though.

      Which reminds me, the mother/father of the Matrix thing is really not so different from humans, is it?

    6. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Actually, necessity is directly tied to good film making. There are several scenes in the movie that would have been much better off had they been a good bit shorter, which wouldn't have been a big deal - if it weren't a chronic condition. The agents scene and the rave scene in particular stand out in my mind in this category. I think they definitely helped push the plot along and were important to the story, they were just drug too long.

    7. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neo just supermans his ass out of there after exploiting all of the latest filming techniques.

      Well, it's worse than that. There were no filming techniques. That entire scene, except for the one or two close-ups, was CG. Excellent CG, granted, but it's kind of sad that when given ungodly sums of money, the creators will just spend it on more CG, and not give us something innovative and unseen like the original bullet-time effect. (Yes, I know they didn't invent it, but it was the first that most people had ever seen of it)

    8. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by MunchMunch · · Score: 1
      Necessity can be tied to good filmmaking. But a film based entirely on running through plot points, thereby fulfilling the 'necessity' of the script, would be 5 minutes long and quite boring.

      The process of making a film, and the final product, are a mix of many necessary and unnecessary elements. Sometimes a movie has to color the necessary parts with some that are unnecessary.

      Whether you agree or not with those scenes, that's your prerogative, but its really not a question of 'necessity or superfluousness.' Personally, I think the rave scene in particular benefits the movie directly because of its jilting out of place-ness, and the movie would be far worse off without it.

    9. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Yes, I know they didn't invent it, but it was the first that most people had ever seen of it)
      Remember the Gap swingdance ad that came out like a year before the Matrix? I bet far more people saw that than have seen the Matrix. Television hits a far wider audience.
    10. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 0

      I agree wholeheartedly, and I challange anyone to explain to me Neo's motivation for just one of the many long fight scenes. It's not like he can finish anyone off. If he were anything more than an idiot, he'd just superman away before all the tiresome kung fu. Unless it was all recreation to him... but then why did we have to watch?

    11. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > though merovingian & company were pretty cool

      Can't wait to see the vidcaps of Monica Belluci's sexy honkin' toes in those strappy heels!

    12. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      I must've been a bit ambiguous with my post, sorry. I didn't say I felt the scenes should be cut from the movie, just that they should be cut in length.

      If you'd re-read my first post - I liked the scenes. I think they were important. It's just that they ran so damn long that I lost interest in them before they were over. The rave scene, for example, was very cool and had a definite point, but it was overly repetitive. It could've stood some serious clipping without damaging its purpose in any way.

      But that's just my opinion.

    13. Re:Matrix Reloads and Dry Fires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPOILER WARNING!

      Did anyone consider that the "Burly Brawl" scene was a fact-finding mission of Agent Smith in order to probe Neo's abilities?

      Also, in addition to being a roller-coaster ride of a scene, I though it was funny as hell when Neo jets up and out, leaving all the agents standing around looking stupid.

  9. I saw it last night, by Jester998 · · Score: 1

    and thought it was freaking *awesome*.

    I didn't find that there was a whole lot of plot development, but what was there was interesting and definitely ties in with the original. The action sequences were just phenomenal, and the soundtrack is freaking awesome. I'd definitely see it again, and I'm definitely waiting for Revolution.

    1. Re:I saw it last night, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>I didn't find that there was a whole lot of plot development

      that quote should stand as the all time understatement of the world.

      the movie sucked donkey balls, when almost every second of the film defies logic, and pretty much just one long CG fest...

      the movie sucked.

      there are no words appropriate to my disappointment.

    2. Re:I saw it last night, by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Most everyone I know who's seen it agrees that the movie itself was excellent, but the ending just makes you want to throttle the Brothers. Blatant, utterly blatant cliffhanger.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    3. Re:I saw it last night, by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      Indeed; the ending of the original Matrix was perfect -- left you hanging a little but wasn't obvious. The whole "To be continued" or whatever the hell it was with Reloaded was a little bit of a piss-off... but oh well. I enjoyed the movie nonetheless.

  10. Neither script, nor plot required by ishmalius · · Score: 1
    I guess this proves the theory that if you trowel on enough glitz, you don't need quality.

    The original had a surprisingly good story line, which overcame the cheesy Kung-Fu. That seems to have evaporated.

    Now it's just going through the motions, punching the ticket.

    1. Re:Neither script, nor plot required by mesach · · Score: 1

      the fact that the original movie, and therefor I assume the entire series, was designed to be shot like an anime(complete with unrealistic martial arts), Must have been lost on you.

      Go read a few anime, look at the pictures, and then go back and watch the movie, alot of the cinematics are just like they are in the comic's.

      Quit yer bitchin', next time just don't go see it.

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:Neither script, nor plot required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So filming a movie like an anime gives it more depth? Or are you saying the scenes aren't cheesy kung fu scenes, but cool anime scenes, although they still look strikingly similar?

    3. Re:Neither script, nor plot required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mod point! A mod point! My kingdom for a mod point!

    4. Re:Neither script, nor plot required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me the kingdom first.

  11. Well, I have not yet spent my $10 by esconsult1 · · Score: 1
    Here in New York, its almost impossible to go see the movie. Everything's usually sold out, and then on the trains, schoolchildren are spoiling the plot (what plot?) for you, since they just saw it.

    I guess I'm gonna go see it eventually, perhaps tomorrow morning at 10am or something when all the geeks are still in bed.

    1. Re:Well, I have not yet spent my $10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thursday's 4:00 PM showing at the UA in Battery Park was half empty.

    2. Re:Well, I have not yet spent my $10 by hobo2k · · Score: 1

      Just be glad if your theaters don't charge extra for it. The amsterdam theaters honoured matrix fans by eliminating matinee pricing and adding another euro on top of the normal max price. Oh wait, NY theaters charge $10? nevermind.

  12. My opinion, not that it matters much by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw the movie last night. My opinion is definitely mixed. The action, was non-stop and outrageous (good), once it got really going. The plot was garbled. The Mind trips were wild. The sex scene, boring uninspired and looking like a hack for 14yo boys. The special effects some better than most(Computer Animation sucked and was OBVIOUS). The ending, uninspired, and transperent. The trailer following the credits, gives away the next movie, and the sucky ending to this one.

    Overall rating (scale 1-10) 7.15

    This is just MY view, you are entitled to yours. This one is mine.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:My opinion, not that it matters much by br4dh4x0r · · Score: 1

      Overall rating (scale 1-10) 7.15

      What kept it from getting the coveted 7.16?

      love,
      br4dh4x0r

    2. Re:My opinion, not that it matters much by TheKey · · Score: 1

      Gives away the next movie? Uh. .. how? So, how did he ( ** SPOILER ** ) stop the sentinels? I personally have no solid idea of what's going to happen.

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
    3. Re:My opinion, not that it matters much by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I thought that any CG scenes in the movie were done pretty much perfectly, because I can't really remember seeing any CG, so hats off to them in that respect.

      If the 2Fast2Furious trailer played before the matrix in your theater, then you will see what cheesy CG is =).

      Original Matrix rating: 10
      Matrix Reloaded rating: 10

    4. Re:My opinion, not that it matters much by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      !!!!SPOILERS!!!!

      He picked up something either from his encounter with Smith or from going to the Source and meeting the Architect. Probably the latter.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    5. Re:My opinion, not that it matters much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the parent is asking, WHY does he have the power to stop the Sentinals? Does he now actually possess 'real' superpowers, does he now understand that Zion is just another layer of the matrix for the ~1% who do not 'choose' the 'normal' matrix, or what?

  13. movie was good, cept beginning by dextr0us · · Score: 1

    In the beginning i thought it was pretty lame, but by the end (plus the SSHing) i thought it was awesome.

    --
    "Martha Stewart can lick my Scrotum......do i have a scrotum?" -- Sharon Osbourne
  14. SSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Top geek/hacker moment:

    Trinity uses SSH!!!!!

    1. Re:SSH by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > Top geek/hacker moment:
      >
      > Trinity uses SSH!!!!!

      Top geek/hacker anti-moment:

      Trinity and Neo having sex!!!!!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  15. My opinion.. by beldraen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I just wanted to weigh in on this movie on a few points that I have seen brough up elsewhere. First, the hype over the CG is not as good as they said, in some places. I heard that I was not going to be able to notice any CG, and in many places I'm not sure how they could have done it without it and it looked great. However, in several places they still just do not have the resolution nor physics quite down right. I think the bullet-time was used in a few places that just did not need it. Overall, I was still very impressed with the imagery. Second, overt plot was good and if you think that there isn't going to be a plot twist (just like _The_Matrix_), you'll be suprised. Amusingly enough, while it is a cliff hanger movie, it didn't end where I expected to end. I honestly thought that it would have probably be better to end the movie a little earlier. Frankly though, it cries out to be completed, just like the Lord of the Rings movies. Finally, I feel sorry for a lot of people who thought it was dry. If one has a background in some theology and philosophy, all of the character cry out certain positions: faith, naturalism, determinism, free-will, gnosticism, body/mind problem, etc. I was very, very impressed with the depth of the references in the movie. Unfortunately, I think that is going to be missed on the vast majority of the movie watchers.

    My two cents,

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    1. Re:My opinion.. by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      IMHO, one of the CG parts overall that I felt needed a lot more work was fabrics. During the Neo/Smith x 10^900000 fight a lot of spots made the fabric look like plastic. Convincing fabric can sometimes make even a very un-real looking character look very real

    2. Re:My opinion.. by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      In a scene where the bullet-time effect seems completely unnecessary, it might be that the scene was partially or completely computer-animated. A collision at high speed would look awful done in CG. (For example, the Agent jumping on the hood of the car would look bad at normal film speed.) A solution that doesn't look completely contrived, is to slow it down with bullet-time and make it look good.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    3. Re:My opinion.. by Mr.123 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. When I first came out of the movie, I thought it didn't measure up to the hype or the first movie. But after thinking about it and then reading discussion and issues raised on many forums, I am convinced that this is a very very impressive movie that surpases the first. From early comments and reviews, it looks like there are those that 'get it' and those that don't. Those that don't will bash the movie for long boring sequences that have little relevance. Truth is it's very hard to catch all the little things in the dialogs and scenes. The long sequences are actually pretty good at telling the plot. The long orgy scene leads credence to Zion being able to reach 250k people in 100 years with only 23 people. I thought it was an excellent movie and now I'm inclined to find out more about philosphy.

    4. Re:My opinion.. by hellswraith · · Score: 1

      Inspiration sometimes comes from very odd places. Don't knock anothers desire to learn.

    5. Re:My opinion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God... I'm not the only person alive who still says "CG" instead of "CGI".

    6. Re:My opinion.. by Popocatepetl · · Score: 1

      I agree, the depth of this movie is fantastic. It is definitely better than the first movie, which I thought was pleasant to watch, but shallow. It was always clear in the first movie, for example, that machines were exploiting people and people were just sleeping through their lives. In contrast, Reloaded does not force a particular point of view, rather it presents a lot of questions with threads of plot that meet and diverge in both obvious and subtle ways.

    7. Re:My opinion.. by beldraen · · Score: 1

      I think the first one was good because it starts out with a very narrow focus: the individual. The second movie makes Neo no longer the savior, but just one of a multitude of voices. I am curious if this trend can continue with the next movie.

      --
      Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    8. Re:My opinion.. by beldraen · · Score: 1

      I noticed the clothing issue. One of the bullet-time effects was when they were running down a corridor (IIRC) and I was like, "Wow, bullets speeding down a hallway? Great use of effects money there."

      --
      Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    9. Re:My opinion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you by any chance homosexual?

    10. Re:My opinion.. by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      I could have seen it end soon as the ship exploded.

      That would have made it more interesting. They're stuck on foot, no ship, Squids after them... yeah that sounds like a good "to be continued" part.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    11. Re:My opinion.. by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > (For example, the Agent jumping on the hood of
      > the car would look bad at normal film speed.)

      This was the same reason they almost never showed Steve Austin running at normal speed. They tried it and it just looked stupid. As a 10 year old, I watched every episode of The Six Million Dollar Man (back in the "...one million dollars!" days) and only saw him running in non slo-mo once, as a farmer watched him run across a field from a distance.

      Dang, what they could do with that show nowadays.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    12. Re:My opinion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, they will.

  16. Bah! by eatenn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I didn't like Reloaded very much at all.

    Not trying to troll here, but the problem with it, IMO, is that the Wachowskis (who wrote and directed it) received so much praise for the first Matrix movie, that they were under the impression the whole world wanted to hear them babble on and on about it.

    Characters will talk for what seems like hours and never actually say anything. In the first movie, the language was simple (Morpheus holds up a battery and proclaims that the machines: "Turn humans... into this."), and you just had to wrap your head around the concepts. In RELOADED, you have to wade through all the tech talk before you can even start to understand what you're being told... by then it's time for the next scene already.

    Also a problem was the overabundance of subplots (Agent Smith, the Morpheus love-triangle, the operator of the Nebachadneza(sp?) and his wife, etc) that they're all underdeveloped and hard to care about.

    Great action though. The Wachowskis obviously care about developing their mythology quite a bit, and that's commendable (and for some, this will demand repeated viewing), but they just need to make it a little more accessible IMO.

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    1. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that movie was incredible...

      Any intelligent person can keep up with the dialogue, and the action scenes were beyond words. That hokey love scene, though, had to be the biggest waste of my time. It's terrible and adds nothing to the plot - If you have to go to the bathroom, this is a good 7 minutes for it. The whole "Jedi Counsel" thing was awkward as well. However, the next hour or so of pure action, thought provoking dialoge, and intreging sub-plots more than makes up for it, and I highly reccomend this movie to anyone.

    2. Re:Bah! by straycheck · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be Nebuchadnezzar, legendary king of Babylon.

      http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/nebuc hadnezzar.html

    3. Re:Bah! by bshanks · · Score: 1

      I thought it was incredible. This movie was almost pure, unadulterated sci-fi (with a few stylish action scenes and a crowded party thrown in). I was worried it would be almost all action with no philosophy or plot. Instead, it was chock full of plot and philosophy (while managing to have lots of great action, too). I like the subplots; the more plot, the better.

      To me, it didn't feel like "wading through tech talk", it felt like a great sci-fi movie. While I understood what was going on on a basic level, I'll have to watch the movie again to be able to catch more of the subtleties in the conversations, and I think that's great.

    4. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your posting on slashdot complaining a movie used technical jargon?

  17. What do you MEAN 'it was nothing like this one'?!? by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Both movies were highly stylized action films which relied on mysticism and special effects to cover up what they really are.

    I mean, wether you agree that it's profound or not (I never understood that one), you can't argue with the fact that The Matrix was a pretty, but pretty mediocre genre film.

    Enjoyable, sure; but take it for what it is, and stop trying to read crap into it which isn't there!

  18. messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by lpret · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, spoiler alert, stop reading if you don't want to know...

    Hmm, you didn't think that the whole architect guy mentioning several other "saviours" wasn't messing with Neo? Or the Oracle for that matter? This issue of choice messed with him, just as much as the issue of reality messed with him in the first one.
    Now, I was seriously messed with right when he was given choices, but I was also messed with later when I contemplated what is being said: "You're not here to make a choice, you've already made it, you're here to find out why you made that choice." Wow. So life isn't making choices, but discovering who we are and why we do what we do. Maybe you don't agree with it, but it is something to think about, and to, in your terms, "mess with our heads."

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  19. The Matrix by ChesireKat · · Score: 1

    I thought it was pretty awesome, the love scenes weren't necessarily needed, but hey, i'm not complaining. 8) The special effects kicked ass. The analogies made in the movies definately sit back and make you say "whoa". Most of them were true to life. Without spoiling the movie, make sure you listen to the analogies made in the movie, especially the ones to programming. Its really a geeks movie if i ever saw one. goes right up there (on a different shelf- but still a classic like..) monty python. Absolutely. :)

    --
    ~Just keep eating, porky. Fat people are harder to kidnap.
    1. Re:The Matrix by thynk · · Score: 1

      Its really a geeks movie if i ever saw one. goes right up there (on a different shelf- but still a classic like..) monty python. Absolutely. :)

      Facinating. I didn't know you'd been in my house. The 2 dvds I own (I rent a lot, but only own 2) are The Matrix and Monty Python's Search for the Holy Grail.

      I wasn't able to see Reloaded this last week, but I plan to go on a nice "quiet" night - maybe Tuesday late show.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  20. 'Matrix' Geeks acting badly by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hissing 'Matrix' fans reloaded w/ tickets, popcorn
    Stephanie Paterik
    The Arizona Republic
    May. 16, 2003 02:10 PM

    Hard-core Matrix Reloaded fans threw popcorn, pounded on the projection room window and ran screaming from the theater when a projector broke during a first-night showing in Chandler.

    Hundreds of people waited hours at Harkins Chandler Fashion Center to see the highly anticipated Matrix sequel at 11 p.m. on opening night Wednesday. A projector lamp broke during the heavily advertised freeway chase scene.

    "The movie was ruined," said Ward Andrews, 28, of Chandler. "You're excited, you're tense and then you don't get to see the key sequence in the film."

    The audio continued to roll but was drowned out by people yelling and shaking their seats. One man climbed on someone's shoulders to pound on the projection room window, said Aubrey Johnson, 22, of Chandler, who waited five hours to see the show.

    The problem was fixed in 10 minutes, but it was impossible to rewind and show the missed two minutes, said Harkins' Jackie Faubus. People who left were given two movie passes each. Those who stayed got coupons for free popcorn.

    1. Re:'Matrix' Geeks acting badly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooo! Not SHAKING THE SEATS! OMG! Come on... yelling is bad enough, but DON'T SHAKE THE SEATS!

    2. Re:'Matrix' Geeks acting badly by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      FREE POPCORN?? They screw them out of the best part of the movie and all they got was free popcorn next time... IF there's a next time... they come back??

      That's crap. The people that left got what was owed, but if I had stayed that movie theater better give me at least one free pass if they ever want to see my face in that theater again.

      Besides, they missed the best part, they should have at least been given one free pass so they could come back and see the part they missed!!!

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:'Matrix' Geeks acting badly by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I wish that the projector had broken down in my theater! I would have been spared the torture of the worst sequel since Highlander 2! As it was, I had a $25 beer tab on Thursday night before my anger with that idiotic movie subsided. That's some expensive non-entertainment!

  21. Philosophy 101 by Traa · · Score: 1

    I liked the movie. Some cool action sequences combined with mellow moody scenes and, like the first movie, an abundance of philosophical topics. Sure, if you know anything about philosophy then you realize that the topics touched upon in the Matrix are hardly groundbreaking. "free choice", "fate", "alternate realities", "Artificial Inteligence", "AI Singularity concequences", etc. All these topics are good for the mind (free the mind imho) but are rarely presented in an accessable way to Joe Average. I have had more semi-philosopical discussions with friends about the Matrix then about any other recent box office success.

    Bring it on Washowski brothers! We want more!

    1. Re:Philosophy 101 by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      Your right...

      And I claim that anybody who is bashing the movie because they don't understand half the scenes (like the rave, smith scene's, ending with neo/smith on the table) are just too stupid to grasp the philosophy of the movie, which BTW is the whole point.

      If its just an action flick to you, I must ask if your IQ is anything above 25?

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
  22. Gnostic reference.. by beldraen · · Score: 1

    WARNING: Plot Spoiler
    WARNING: Plot Spoiler
    WARNING: Plot Spoiler

    It's the gnostic appreciation of life and the senses. I found it moving, sensual and erotic. Notice that the machines were willing to even make bombs that are machines. And, when Neo finally finds the machine he has to talk to, everything is just about aborations in the system. It cannot make the jump to the idea that perhaps there is something beyond logic and fact, an appreciation for life is one of t(R7

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
  23. Record Sales Days by hirebrand · · Score: 2, Informative

    5/4/2002 Spider-Man $43,622,264

    5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $42,508,303

    5/3/2002 Spider-Man $39,406,872

    11/16/2002 Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets $34,213,803

    11/17/2001 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone $33,512,941

    11/16/2001 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone $32,333,203

    5/3/2003 X2: X-Men United $32,000,629

    www.the-numbers.com

  24. what to expect/not to expect out of any movie by maskedavenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think some people went to this movie thinking it would make them realize much more out of life than is expected, much like the first. But if you read any modern philosophy (Berkeley, Hume, Kant, etc) you would already have answered the questions the first movie brought up. Now in reloaded the Wachowski brothers just surfaced more of the same philosophers original works. Causality, purpose, yada yada, that was all dealt with in the new movie; in the first it was epistemology.

    I went into this movie only for the action shots. On the other hand I did enjoy the brief breaks like the "rave". Coulda done without so much of Reeve's skin and a little more of Moss's, which I've dubbed Trinititty :)

    Anyways, goto the movie only expecting awsome effects. The philosophy's still there but much more subtle. Being that Revolutions was filmed at the same time I doubt it will be any different than this one.

    On a side note, Enter the Matrix looks like a fun game. I'll rent before buying it.

    --
    Who is that masked man?
    1. Re:what to expect/not to expect out of any movie by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      But if you read any modern philosophy (Berkeley, Hume, Kant, etc) you would already have answered the questions

      If you think those works answer any questions, I think you missed the point. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:what to expect/not to expect out of any movie by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1
      I think some people went to this movie thinking it would make them realize much more out of life than is expected, much like the first.


      I can only speak for myself but neither of the movies led to any revelations for me, at least ones with any girth. Sure there is some insight in the movie into (apparently) over-caned philosphical subjects, of which i have never really delved into.

      I am rather apathetic to the "what is real?/the meaning of life/ do we have any choice?" psyche as it leads to nothing but me chasing my mind in circles.
    3. Re:what to expect/not to expect out of any movie by maskedavenger · · Score: 1

      point being how much can we know? that's exactly what they dealt with... The W. Bros just reinvented it in a medium mass culture can understand ;)

      --
      Who is that masked man?
    4. Re:what to expect/not to expect out of any movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But if you read any modern philosophy (Berkeley, Hume, Kant, etc) you would already have..." ...put the pistol in my mouth and not be responding to this post...

      kant?! KANT?!?!?!
      i weep for this world...

    5. Re:what to expect/not to expect out of any movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > which I've dubbed Trinititty

      A charter member of the Itty Bitty Trinity Titty Committee.

      Almost, but no niplage cigars.

  25. I thought... by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...this movie was cool. Just the action and intellectual level I was looking to see on a Friday night. Furthermore, my experience with "Star Wars" (Episodes 1 and 2) has given me the ability to endure surprising amounts of poor acting and stilted dialogue. I'm ready to throw down another $8.75 to see that movie again, and I'm someone who is too cheap to go see movies in theaters to being with.

  26. Schizo hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Let's see, what will we at Slashdot believe today:
    • Hollywood and the MPAA are tyrannical fascist money grubbing leeches.
      OR

    • This is so cool. Hollywood is really raking in the cash hand over fist. 42 million dollars in one day!
    1. Re:Schizo hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG, I can't believe someone modded this awesome post flamebait.

      If this ever shows up in my metamod page, the metamodder better prepar himself for a new asshole.

  27. Re:Lets all shut the fuck up about The Matrix. Mmk by maskedavenger · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think you're trying to hinder everyone's right to opinion. Just because you want to sound smart and pound jargin into our heads like we're drones milling around having anonymous sex doesn't mean you're some savior to show us the light. Let us talk, you don't have to listen.

    --
    Who is that masked man?
  28. In The Bedroom == One Terrible Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. So what you are saying... by Snaller · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is that the evil computers are running Unix?! :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:So what you are saying... by Dausha · · Score: 5, Funny

      [ . . . ]is that the evil computers are running Unix?!

      Well, if a computer has to decide which is the most reliable, secure operating system to work with, would you expect to see Windows NT or Mac? What you should be saying is, "choosy computers chose Unix."

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    2. Re:So what you are saying... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Funny

      evil computers are running Unix?!

      +

      you should be saying is, "choosy computers chose Unix."

      ... perhaps that should then be ...

      Evil geniuses choose Unix. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:So what you are saying... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      No these are the computers that are inside the matrix. They are the servers regulating the city's power grid.

      Nothing to do with the matrix itself as a computer.

    4. Re:So what you are saying... by Fishstick · · Score: 4, Funny

      man, that's a mind-fsck

      The matrix, a computer-simulated reality, is simulating computers running Unix with unpatched ssh.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:So what you are saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, it could easily be BSD, running on Mac OS X.

      AC

  30. I Prefer the Bootleg ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hate going to the theater, which is nothing more than a suburban teenage hang-out. Not to mention the fact that there is a stigma about being the lone creepy guy in the back row.

    Watched the VCD and thought the first hour was a waste with little story/character development, though the second half made up for it.

    1. Re:I Prefer the Bootleg ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was down on Canal Street earlier this afternoon and some Niggas had VHS bootleg copies going for $10. I suspect these were "homemade" bootlegs where some Nigga smuggled a camcorder into the theater.

  31. Is it just me ... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
    Or did the "music" during the Zion sequence (w/ Neo & Trinity) sound like a low-budget porno flick theme?

    Of course ... see the movie and judge for yourself ...

    --
    Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    1. Re:Is it just me ... by maskedavenger · · Score: 1

      have you ever gone to see Stomp? HBO did a special on them but it's nothing like seeing them on stage. Seeing that scene with the Stomp-like music made me feel like I was watching a malt-beverage commercial. I wanna know why only good looking people get saved from the matrix. Those dancers were fine-azz hunnies.

      --
      Who is that masked man?
    2. Re:Is it just me ... by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, that was one of the most ingeniously orchestrated jungle pieces I've hear in my life.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    3. Re:Is it just me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "music", Fluke - Zion, would be classified at typical Progressive House as a genre, the predominant dance floor fare for underground clubland in major metro cities in the USA, and the major popular/radio musical style in most of Europe. Not quite what the RIAA boy-band pablum your used to being fed.

    4. Re:Is it just me ... by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point of the scene, and of the movie. You should go watch it again, or just stop watching philisophical movies.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    5. Re:Is it just me ... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I was really expecting a malt beverage product placement when that dude with the really long dreads started to stand up.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    6. Re:Is it just me ... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      apparently you have a lackluster amount of knowledge in the realm of EDM. I felt it was a quite moving piece. I really didn't feel like that part of the movie was that long at all, maybe cuz i was grooving to the beat.

      On an off-tangent note i'm not so sure about defining it as a rave (i.e. warehouse parties) is very accurate. Sure some of the elements are there but more or less rave was just a catchword for warehouse parties and it belongs to a specific piece of time (89-?? depending on who you ask..). Sure there are still 'raves' today but they aren't anything like they were and longstanders in the scene now disdain from referring to parties as 'raves' as it has come to encompass everything commercial and cliche about the electronic dance music 'underground' [i use the term lightly] (drugs, more specifically e-bombs, shitty NU-NRG/HHC music, flagrant acts of love( or lust), a false sense of 'unity' etc). Seeing as none of this aspect is really portrayed in the zion scene. I think its more correctly dubbed a party (i.e. 'celebration of life'). I know it's a small nitpick...

    7. Re:Is it just me ... by reiggin · · Score: 1

      I think that if the folks behind the Matrix movies read what you just called it ("philisophical"), they'd laugh their ass off at you. It's no more philisophical than philosophical or even philasophical. It's entertainment and it only succeeds at that. It's not meant for philosophy or even high art. It's meant to entertain and if it does that (plus bring in the money to prove it), it's made its creators very happy indeed. Meanwhile, you need to show me a "philisophical" movie.

    8. Re:Is it just me ... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      the piece is "Fluke - Zion" and just FYI it is not jungle. Jungle is a derivative of Drum n Bass which is a type of breakbeat (characterized by its long 'flowwy' (or tube) sounding bass line) jungle and drum n bass can be used rather interchangeably for the most part (though there are some finer points which are differences).

      this is progressive tribal [house] in my opinion.

  32. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the problem is that the first hour of the movie has none of the questioning. Neo isn't really challenged on that level. In the first movie, almost every single scene presented some new piece of information. In this one, there's a lot of running around and fighting, and in between those scenes, it's people talking about doing it. Either that, or we're treated to overly long rave scenes and overly long exposition about "cause and effect."

    The last half is when things got cool and felt like a sequel to the first one.

    Granted, much of these structure problems may make more sense when Revolutions is released, since they were treated as one big movie split in two. The movie was good, but I missed the goth-noir feel of the first one, and I missed the real sense of danger. Only near the end did I feel that.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  33. Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by iamchaos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From a philosophical and spiritual point of view I enjoyed this film more than the first. I left the first film thinking, wow what a great idea. I left this film questioning everything I just saw. The angle of Neo being the rebellious child of the world that was created by the architect, and realizing that he has free will and the same abilities the creators of the Matrix and lesser programs have really resonated with me. I can see where they are going and am quite interested in seeing if the real world is discovered to be another type of Matrix. Which I hope is the bold angle they might take instead of it being part of the same Matrix designed as a distraction. The creators of this film truly managed to convey a deep message intertwined with intense action and the idea that "he is just human" disputing itself repeatedly. They expounded on the original concept very well, leaving splintering questions in my mind. He was handed a spoon in the real world before returning to the Matrix. Maybe he will realize once again that there is no spoon. After all, what is real?

    #!/i/am/chaos

    1. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a gimp.

    2. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Nice to know that SOMEONE gets it. Sad to learn how few Slashdotters actually read.

      Congrats.

    3. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by bellings · · Score: 1

      I'm betting the chick he kissed was the only thing that was "real" in the whole universe.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    4. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by steele25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I saw the movie last night, and then read the disscusion on Matrix which featured on slashdot 2 days back. Without reiterating the reasons again, I think i agree with the whole concept of "Matrix within a Matrix". The question then is what could be the real purpose of machines if the idea of man being battary is also an illusion to blind humans from realising that Zion is also a matrix.

      I think there are no machines. Infact the Matrix is built by Humans (and not machines), to develope AI. And all the characters we see in the movie are just computer programs (like Agent Smith, Oracle). Which means Neo is also a computer program.

      Right now Neo is in version 6, and shown to be most promising candidate to being closest to being a human, and thus being the perfect AI. He is the only one to realise that Zion is also a Matrix, and thus becoming self-aware (which regular programs are not). Maybe Persephone (Monica Bellucci) is the only human in the Matrix, and when she asks Neo to kiss her, she is infact testing whether Neo can truely show humans emotion too. The architect is also there to test the program of Neo, by giving a few hints, and see if Neo realises that Zion is also a matrix.

      I think in the 3rd part we will see what Morpheus said in the first movie, "In the beginning of 21st century, the mankind was celebrating the creating of AI" (or whatever). This AI is Neo.v6, and humans will be celebrating its successful creation in 3rd part.

      But then, this is just what I think ....

    5. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by odin53 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that movie The 13th Floor with Gretchen Mol.

    6. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      It was said when the first Matrix came out that the film was loosely based on a few separate novels. One being David F. Galouye's "Simulacron-3". If you haven't read it, its extremely interesting. It's a tough one to find, though, its been out of print for 30-some years. Anyway, the final plot twist of the book is that the reader discovers that the "real world" is actually a simulation. Thus, two simulations are layered on top of one another.

      (If you don't like reading, watch "The Thirteenth Floor", it came out months after the Matrix and is a direct interpretation of "Simulacron-3")

    7. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left the first film thinking, wow what a great idea.

      Yeah, I left the first day of my "Intro To Philosophy" class thinking the same thing.

    8. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2, Insightful
      !!!!SPOILERS!!!

      No, I didn't buy the matrix-in-a-matrix bit. What I gathered from the Architect was that the last 1% of humans that don't buy the illusion must have an out. A safety pressure valve for the matrix, as it were. Those who must escape can go to Zion. But Zion is a very real threat, so it has to be exterminated periodically. The holding pool must be emptied, lest it spill over and make a mess. But The One #6 didn't buy it. He risked both the death of Trinity and the extinction of the human race for the hope of saving both.

      Just occured to me. The line from the first movie: "When the matrix was first built, there was a man born inside who had the ability to change whatever he wanted. ... It was he who freed the first of us, taught us the truth." is actually true. The One #5 was present when the previous Zion got wiped and, as part of his deal with the Architect, chose the first 23 people to free and to build, yet again, the last human city on earth.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    9. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by beldraen · · Score: 1

      One problem with this: How did Neo stop the machines in "real life?" That ain't reality.. That's the big clue.

      --
      Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    10. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      This is a thought bouncing around in my head. Neo is a massive patch we're told. Like a big kernal recompile. What if the matrix uses a form of assembly that the brain can understand. Neo contains the code for the whole OS of the matrix, what if the machines in the real world are based on the same code for thier software minds. What if mankind is a huge beowulf cluster that supports the machines. If Neo can distrupt the matrix from the inside, maybe he can do it from the outside? That would prevent it from being a matrix within a matrix but still allow that.

    11. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, you're so fucking deep. I'm sorry, but your brilliant observation is obvious to any C- college student in my intro philosophy class, and that was long before this second movie came out. As you can imagine, we were expecting something a bit deeper than this tiresome and predictable "twist". Not that it's a bad idea, but it takes 10 minutes of screentime to develop fully--and then the story needs to go somewhere. But the actual movie is 2 hours of pure garbage and then the most predictable 'surprise' ever filmed.

    12. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not 100% on how.. but whatever it is .. is what allowed Smith to inhabit someone.

    13. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if neo is statically linked, and doesn't need the matrix's main libraries?

      he's self contained, and he's starting to figure it out!!!!

    14. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      > what if neo is statically linked?

      Can't be. There was some .dll action (Dynamic Link Laying) going on with Trinity.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    15. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by iamchaos · · Score: 1

      Take a deep breath. Now, look deep into yourself and discover why it is that you can't realize that people have different opinions. Also, I took this from more of a spiritual level which I am sure is hard for you to recognize, because after all, you are right. Which of course is what makes you wrong. It is sad that the meaning was lost on so many people like yourself. I recommend studying some Gnostic, Buddhist, Taoist and Neo-Pagan text to have more of an understanding of where they are coming from. None of these themes were touched on in your college philosophy class, which is part of the reason you are having a hard time seeing where it is coming from. It is also why you resort to attacking people who share their opinion. It is a shame that you are this way.

    16. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      He's got stuff for interfacing with machines embedded in his skull, remember?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    17. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I think that the Matrix is an arc.

      Humanity fucked up the earth and was forced to retreat into a scealed virtual world while humanity's machine were left in charge of caring for our bodies.

      But since the human brain tends to resist the fake world, the machines devised a plan to let us "escape" the matrix while still keeping us safely inside their mechanical wombs. What we get to watch is the trials and tribulations of those unfortunate human minds who reject the basic matrix construct and who are allowed into a crapier reality. The second layer matrix construct is designed to both be much crapier than the 1st level (its a cold, hostile place) and still provide escapist situations to make it worth while (orgies and superpowers/mechas/flying ships). The fact that it is in many ways crapier than the original helps make it seem more real (notice how physical pain is rare in dreams?).

      The advantage? Efficiency: You provide the bodies with the bare necessities and feed the brain the illusion of opulence.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    18. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      > Ooooh, you're so fucking deep. I'm sorry, but your brilliant observation is obvious to any C- college student in my intro philosophy class

      You said earlier you're a teacher - is this the way you nurture your students and their learning? "Ooooh, you're so fucking deep - I thought of that YEARS ago".

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    19. Re:Deeper meanings (*** WARNING SPOOLERS ***) by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. The recursive matrix crap would catch on with cheap nasdaq executives who chime away at fractals, big bang loop etc, thinking they have a superior intelligence just because they read that sciam colourful diagram. Bah, the parent is right, Zion serves the purpouse of garbage collecting. I'm a bit worried though: Neo is special because he doesn't play by the Matrix API but unplugged he's just flesh & blood. How can he interface and destroy the machines? I'm wary about this...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  34. Re:use of language by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 1

    That's a bit of an unfair criticism. 'heavy' language can often be used to accentuate the writers' point. However, I do agree that using profanity for it's own sake is usually a mistake.

    And really, I don't think that there is any artistic necessity to use the word 'fuck' in a film. I just don't see it.

  35. Re:Lets all shut the fuck up about The Matrix. Mmk by kamapuaa · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I don't think it's quite that simple. Sure "Matrix 2" sucks, but was so heavily promoted that people (including me, and I don't even watch TV) flock to see it. But "Adventures of Pluto Nash" supposedly was a lot worse, and that movie was hardly promoted at all.

    On the opposite side, "Spider Man" was pretty good, that got promoted like a mother.

    As far as the business goes, it seems like word of mouth type movies sometimes get popular, but often-times don't. It took an Oscar for "Spirited Away" to get big.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  36. Re:anyone else think... *SPOILER* by mESSDan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ***SPOILER****

    Taking into consideration, it makes the death of all of those people at the end more real.

    It is much easier to forget about the deaths of those you have never seen. This helps to lend credence to the fact that the number of dead was quite staggering.

    --

    -- Dan
  37. Re:use of language by unisol5 · · Score: 0

    one guy i ment not "one go"

  38. Trinity's ass by neoform · · Score: 1

    why the hell didn't they show the opening scene where she jumps off the bike and they give that great ass shot, again at the end of the movie?! damn them!

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Trinity's ass by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Wait for a DVD-rip to be released, cut that scene out with Virtual Dub and play it on repeat!

      That should more than make up for the "loss". :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Trinity's ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you followed correctly, you would know the rips are already there

    3. Re:Trinity's ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please inform me of the location of a DVD-rip of Matrix Reloaded then.

  39. Animatrix references by Rufus211 · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those of you that have not seen all of the Animatrix, there were 2 direct references to it in Reloaded.

    1) Final Flight of the Osiris: well, this reference one is obvious enough. The Osiris is a sister ship that sees the comming army and sends a warning message back to Zion.

    2) Kid's Story: In this Animatrix Neo gives some kid a personal invite out of the matrix and he makes it. I'm almost certain that the kid following Neo around in Zion is this same kid (especially the "I didn't save you, you saved yourself" quote, which follows with the Animatrix how the kid cept himself alive).

    Oh, and no, the Animatrix doesn't come out on DVD for an other 2 weeks or so, which is a shame. You think they would have released it first since it really adds quite a bit to the story.

    1. Re:Animatrix references by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      Yeah I thought it added a lot to the plot. They should have released it first. Personally I think Kid's Story was the best short.

    2. Re:Animatrix references by zephc · · Score: 1

      saw Animatrix last week (thank you, eDonkey), and while I enjoyed all the films, but after watching it a few times, Beyond I think is my favorite, because it's NOT about the plot of The Matrix or even any main characters, but because it was much more subdued, I guess.

      Away from the frantic energy of the other films, there is this moment in time where the kids and the girl can just ENJOY themselves, enjoying the glitches in the Matrix.

      I kind of see it as a metaphor for people enjoying their lives, then some beaurocracy coming in and ruining it all... how temporary a simple joie de vie can be in modern life.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Animatrix references by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      matriculated was the most bizzare one out of the 9... the people were to reprogram the machines, and by the end of the clip, the machine it was trying to reprogram had feelings for the human.... hmmm...so machines are supposed to have feelings now? and the "world" in the clip looks very bizzare too.... maybe that's the new "real world" after zion is destroyed?

      i agree with you about kid's story. that immediately came to my mind when i was watching the film. i'm just thinking now if the kid's going to play a significant role in revolutions.

    4. Re:Animatrix references by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      I thought there were only 4 out so far? (http://www.intothematrix.com/) Am I missing something?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    5. Re:Animatrix references by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      Only 4 will be released online. There are 9 total, and they are/will be available on DVD as a set.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  40. Raver culture was also quickly featured in part 1 by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 1

    So, it could be argued that it's a 'theme', and not just a cheap excuse to [not?] show TnA. ;)

  41. NOT Opening by grimani · · Score: 2, Informative

    Opening is usually the opening weekend, from Friday to Sunday. Thursday is not considered part of that opening weekend.

    1. Re:NOT Opening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opening is opening day no matter what. First weekend is first weekend no matter what. $42.5 for the first 30 hrs of the release.

  42. i saw it yesterday night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i didn't find the sex scene all that interesting. i think their position and the camera angle wasn't very good. i thought the music during the clone fight thingy was obnoxious as well as the music when he was fighting with all the swords on the wall. other than that. very nice movie.

  43. the chocolate cake orgasm by bcool · · Score: 1

    was the stupidest thing I have seen in a while. I liked the rest though...

    1. Re:the chocolate cake orgasm by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      Stupid? No. Out of place? Perhaps. I was distracted from the movie by that sequence... I was thinking:

      "I need some of that shit!"

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    2. Re:the chocolate cake orgasm by Mr.Phil · · Score: 1

      how was it out of place? That was the girl that "kissed" Persephone's husband and left the lip stick, I'd wager.

    3. Re:the chocolate cake orgasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking that a piece of chocolate cake sounds even better than usual after that. I went home and made brownies but it wasn't the same.

    4. Re:the chocolate cake orgasm by bcool · · Score: 1

      i didn't think it was so much out of place. I just think it was really cheesy to show it the way they did. I bet it would be more effective if they just showed her reaction from a distance without the Matrix view...

  44. My take on it all by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    I sat down and was immediately treated to a sequence of over the top eye candy... as if I truly needed to be drawn into the movie any more than having watched the first one practically every day in college as a stress-relief. But thankfully it slowed down.... but didn't advance the plot much. Over all only about 20 minutes of actual plot were in place- very disappointing. It was screwing with my head- in fact I've an opinion about the 'real-world' now that bugged me in the first one but I'm not sharing :)

    I just wish there was a bit more plot, less sex, and less 'action'. Hard to believe as I'm an action junky (kiss of the dragon has 2 incredible action sequences as well choreographed as the matrix) but.... they'd better release the 'concluded' part very DAMN SOON because I'm highly irritated at where they left it :)

  45. The people who hated it: by mcc · · Score: 1

    A LOT of people seem to have very much disliked this movie. This didn't annoy me until I talked to them, and now it does, a little. I don't mind people not liking a movie I liked, but from talking to a lot of such people i'm beginning to cynically suspect that almost everyone who really disliked Matrix Reloaded did so for one simple reason:

    They walked into the movie expecting it to be Matrix 1 again, and it isn't. It's a different movie.

    That may be a little unfair, but really, most of the people who hated Matrix Reloaded, you ask them why, and what they answer is that the movie basically failed to live up to the specific expectations they had coming in. Well, whatever. I *liked* the surprise of the general tack the movie took, and I for one actually realized before I walked in that it was just going to be a "fun action movie", so I was prepared for that. You know how I know? *BECAUSE THE TRAILERS MADE IT COMPLETELY FRICKING OBVIOUS* that it was going to be a straightforward action movie!

    And I'm less sure about this, but: I think the main argument against it seems to be that they missed the "depth" of the first one. Except the second one had its own sort of depth, it just wasn't at all on the same subjects. The first one was full of this very interesting exploration of the meaning of reality. The second one didn't do this, becuase they'd already said everything they had to say on that subject (anyway, the entire second movie almost is spent in the Matrix, and they KNOW what the nature of reality is in the Matrix). The second one just tells a story, but arcing through that story is an also pretty interesting exploration of [mouseover for minor spoiler]. But a lot of people watched it *wanting* this to be an exploration of the nature of reality, and tried to interpret what depth there was as being depth about the nature of reality, from which viewpoint the plot movements seemed asinine and random, the philosophizing seemed irrelivant and trite, and the dialogue seems like bullshit shoehorned in so the movie would have "deep philosophical dialogue" in. But once you get the movie, it works really well. I think.

    And it isn't like the ideas in the first one are the most brilliant, original things ever. It was just that the way they were *presented* was brilliant. In a way, the first movie was just an action movie with Plato's Cave as the star. The second movie was just an action movie with [mouseover for MAJOR spoiler] as the star.

    (Note: I will acknowledge the second movie had a little bit of trouble getting its momentum started, and the beginning was a little disjointed, and I know that can ruin an entire movie for some people. But I think it redeemed itself pretty quickly..)

    1. Re:The people who hated it: by Julius+X · · Score: 1

      Mod this parent up, he hits the nail on the head! People who're saying the movie sucks just don't get it.... this guy has it right.

      --

      -Julius X
      remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    2. Re:The people who hated it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okfine
      my expectations were high

      but here are some concrete reasons the movie sucks

      1. cheeze - this movie is so fukin cornball
      its ridiculous. the zion rave dance scene is the
      worst. morpheus talks to much about nothing. fine.
      but its sounds like corny nothing rather than deep nothing. the CGI fight after Neo talks to the oracle is so obvious. doesnt even look like him. and drags on. I got to where I dreaded seeing another fight scene. they were all the same.
      2. they fuck up the whole story they built in the
      first one trying to make it even more complicated.
      a matrix within a matrix. 5 Neos have come before.
      the first had a brilliant premise because it was a simple yet profound idea. they went and muddled it all up
      3. enough is enough. some scenes go on forever.
      the rave/sex scene was retarded. the movie would have been better without it. the 100 Agent Smiths was so stupid. its the kind of scene I expect from a video game in between levels
      4. undeveloped, shallow subplots
      5. the chocolate cake orgasm proved what ??
      6. the villians, except for the twins, SUCKED
      7. the architect actually sits in a room with
      a thousand monitors ? stand in line for cheez
      8. keanu needs to stay out of love scenes. please.
      9. everybody has these crazy powers but doesnt use them. why didnt neo fly away in the very beginning of his fight? ad naseum

      basically the film got too big for their collective britches. they should have KISS
      (kept it simple stupid). instead they went big budget cheez. but its still mostly filler.

    3. Re:The people who hated it: by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      The first one was full of this very interesting exploration of the meaning of reality. The second one didn't do this, becuase they'd already said everything they had to say on that subject

      If you didn't think this one was playing with the nature of reality, you weren't paying attention.

    4. Re:The people who hated it: by mcc · · Score: 1

      If you didn't think this one was playing with the nature of reality, you weren't paying attention.

      But it wasn't quite the main thrust, I don't think. And the parts that *were* the main thrust, the whole choices/fate/cause and effect thing.. i think that's kind of a subset of "the nature of reality", but it's more subtle and less *general*. And that was my point, that people were expecting everything to be more all-encompassing and for it to be obvious what the point was, like the first one was. (I thought it was pretty cool, though.) I was unclear, sorry.

    5. Re:The people who hated it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I thought the movie was great. I'm gonna see it at least a few more times in the theatre.

      Point By Point
      1. cheeze - this movie is so fukin cornball
      its ridiculous. the zion rave dance scene is ...


      That's not concrete like you claim. The dance scene I think perhaps was overdone but it wasn't anywhere as bad as some people are making it out to be.

      2. they fuck up the whole story they built in the first one trying to make it even more complicated. a matrix within a matrix. 5 Neos have come before. the first had a brilliant premise because it was a simple yet profound idea. they went and muddled it all up

      I don't see how it's that much more complicated. If you can accept the idea of a virtual world created for humans to occupy, why would there only be one matrix?

      3. enough is enough. some scenes go on forever.
      the rave/sex scene was retarded. the movie would have been better without it. the 100 Agent Smiths was so stupid. its the kind of scene I expect from a video game in between levels


      The Smiths scene was there for two reasons. Partially to tell us how Smith has changed (important for the next movie!!!) and (perhaps more importantly) to demonstrate their impressive graphcs :) I agree with you a bit, they could have cut down the Agent Smith bit about 25%.

      4. undeveloped, shallow subplots

      Wait for the next half of the movie. If you are keeping track of the plots, they will all come back together and it will make more sense.

      5. the chocolate cake orgasm proved what ??

      The ability of the special computer Programs (or whoever that guy was...) to cause a change to the cake that makes it so good it'll make you orgasm I guess. He *is* French after all.

      6. the villians, except for the twins, SUCKED

      This is an interesting (if not delicately stated) claim. In the first movie, we had Smith and his cronies (Agents). In this one, we have The Smiths, the new version of the Agents, and they bring into play the idea of "rogue" Programs. I think they villians sucked because the outcome never seemed in doubt. You knew that Neo was gonna kick their asses, and then he did. That probably did take some of the excitement of it away. In the first movie, you felt the whole time that Neo was in danger. In this one, he just seems too... powerful ...at times.

      7. the architect actually sits in a room with a thousand monitors ? stand in line for cheez

      He did when Neo met him. I thought that scene was interesting and well-done.

      8. keanu needs to stay out of love scenes. please.

      No argument here. I don't think it hurt the movie as a whole that bad.

      9. everybody has these crazy powers but doesnt use them. why didnt neo fly away in the very beginning of his fight? ad naseum

      I think he stayed and fought to see what his enemy was made of.

      You made a lot of good points about stuff which could make it a bad movie, but I thought it was awesome.

    6. Re:The people who hated it: by mcc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can't make a sequel without adding complexity. That's what a sequel *IS*. You're basically just proving my point: I say "the people who didn't like Reloaded thought so because they were expecting it to be what the first one was" and you said "Reloaded sucks because it wasn't simple like the first one." :P (Yeah, I realize you still would have thought Reloaded was cheesy and dumb even without the Matrix to judge it against)

      Anyway, I get what you're saying, and it would have been REALLY REALLY COOL if they could have kept the koan-like minimalism and preserved the ambiguity of the first one, but i don't know if that was possible; at the least, it would have been rediculously hard to do that and still make the second one actually do anything besides retread the first movie. At the least, it isn't a reasonable expectation to have of filmmakers who are still pretty damn early on in their careers. (If you think the sex scene in Matrix Reloaded was Cheesy, just watch Bound. I mean, yeesh.)

      However. The second movie went and "muddled all up" the point of the first movie becuase *the second movie had a different point than the first one*. Personally I prefer this to a movie that doesn't really bring anything new.

      I can't really respond to the cheese thing. It was over the top, if you think that's a bad thing then that's your perogative or whatever. I think most of the "cheese" you just kind of have to understand why it was there. (Except for the 100 Smiths scene, that was totally gratuitous ^_^) I have this long rambling defense of why the ravesex scene was there, but I'm going to post it as a reply to this and i may not do it until later.

      Anyway, my attempt to respond to your other points:

      3. Yeah, i'll give you that. Though I actually found it kind of amusing the way the 100 agent smiths thing just went on and on. In a silly sort of way.

      4. Almost all of the subplots were either conclusions of subplots from "The Animatrix", or were setting up subplots to be resolved in the third film. No subplots *really* occured in this film, only plot devices.

      5. It didn't prove anything. That entire scene was just this elitist virtual french bastard being a dick and having fun in his own restaurant while totally blowing Neo and Morpheus off. Nothing in the restaurant had anything to do with the movie or anything else. It was just a wierd little arbitrary exploration of what exactly is the nature of the AI and "programs" living in the matrix, and it moved the plot along. And I for one thought the entire scene was absolutely hilarious, whether it was necessary or ont.

      Also, the chocolate cake orgasm specifically made it absolutely clear what the bug and "red pill" did in the first movie: it wasn't a pill. It was a computer program that took the appearance of a pill within the matrix.

      6. I don't agree, but that's a valid opinion.

      7. The room wasn't real.

      The room was simply a manifestation of whatever it was that the Architect wanted it to be, given the impact the Architect wanted to have on Neo. The Architect just happened to be a self-important and melodramatic entity. Thus the 100 screens.

      8. You have a point here.

      9. First, Neo hasn't quite figured out how to take advantage of his own powers.

      Second, and most importantly, I think it's been very clearly established Neo isn't exactly the brightest person out there. Hence his tendency to react to just fight off the bad guys rather than trying to figure out how to manipulate the matrix to obliterate them utterly. No one other than Neo has crazy powers, except the Agents, and its been established the Agents are (1) limited because they won't circumvent the system (2) not fighting any *really* important battles.

    7. Re:The people who hated it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I thought it sucked because the fight scenes were largely pointless and way too long and very, very boring. The plot barely advanced until the end, and even then was lame and very predictable. I think I hurt my eyes rolling them so much.

      What *I* can't believe is how many people like such a terrible movie. It is like everyone thinks the first movie was so great, and the next one MUST be, and so no matter what they won't admit it sucks. A lot of people even seem to convince themselves it doesn't suck instead of admitting to themselves that they hyped up this movie in their head and it just ended up blowing donkey cock.

  46. It's a matter of 'flow' and the big picture by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 1

    What directors are thinking of, these days, is box sets; and how their movies will fit in that format. Basically, I found it jarring watching starwars back-to-back because of stopping at ESB and then restarting at Jedi Granted, doing things this way makes the theatre-going experience a bit of a let-down for the reasons you've cited; but that's why you bought the big-screen tv and the dvd player in the first place, right? ;)

  47. Taco can't even get the movie title right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco,

    It's "Reloaded", not "Reloads".

  48. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by podperson · · Score: 1

    Seems to me this is only something to think about if you haven't done much thinking up to this point.

  49. What good is a phone call... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Funny

    This reminds me of the time I was walking down the street, just minding my own business, when some nicely dressed gentlemen on bicycles were going around passing out Morman religious materials. Since I am proud of my religion, I find it somewhat offensive when these guys come up and offer theirs. They always like to ask questions, too. So these two guys come up and ask me if I'd like a Bible. (At least they cut to the chase this time.) Holding up my arms as if presenting a new reality, I say, "This... is the construct." The guys were like, uh, let's get out of here!!! On another occasion, I said, "Do you hear that?" (Hear what?) "That is the sound of inevitability."

    1. Re:What good is a phone call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cryptopsy fucking rules.

    2. Re:What good is a phone call... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Since I am proud of my religion, I find it somewhat offensive when these guys come up and offer theirs.

      I'm proud of the drawings my kid has hanging on the fridge. Are you offended by those, simply because you're proud of the drawings your kid has done?

      Or are you jealous that the Mormons have the balls to proselytize their religion, and you do not?

      (Me -- I'm offended by religion, period, so I think both you and the Mormons such. Booya! :-) )

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  50. Yeah, lots of dopes who didnt get the film at all. by LibertineR · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I cannot for the life of me understand how so many people can miss the significance of that scene. If you thought you were likely to die the next day, what the hell would you be doing? It was a celebration of life. Real Life.

    In real life, were we not concerned about making a living or feeding children, what would we do all day? It would not be much different than what we saw in that scene, if you thought it might all end shortly.

    All I know is, if I ever get the sense that I might be dead within 24 hours, Monica Belluci better not be within driving distance of me, or she is going to get more from me than what Neo gave her.

  51. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by owlicks58 · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'll tell you why it wasn't challanging at all to me. The stupid thing turned into a friggin love story! Aw, Neo sacrifices everything to save his woman, how cute. The first movie was more of an introspective thing challanging perception. This turned into a cheesey feel good movie, just like the new star wars ended up doing. I'm tired of happy endings and love stories, I want a challanging movie that doesn't have a happy ending to sell tickets. This is why I admired Fight Club so much, the movie made itself a philosophical plot, and stuck with it all the way through.

    --
    -Alex
  52. You're wrong by A+Proud+American · · Score: 0

    Trying to find the sexiest woman that will screw you is all about free will and choice, two of the main themes from the movie.

  53. The Animatrix by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

    I just saw The Animatrix last night (I know it's not released yet), and it's really good. I especially liked Kid's Story. I think if you like The Matrix and anime, you'll like The Animatrix.
    Anyone else seen it yet? Lemme know :)

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  54. Serious questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (tiny spoiler) Who was the guy on the other table at the end? Was it the freaky guy that was gonna stab Neo right before he got handed the spoon?

    Which it seems interesting that the spoon is basically what prevented Neo's death in the real world ... now who wanted that spoon delivered to Neo again?

    I gotta see it again, last one took me 2 or 3 times before I got 95% of it.

  55. Re:TRINITY DIES!!! OMFG! :( by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 1

    Then give that troll a contract and send him to hollywood: sounds like your typical PR stunt/astroturfing to me! LOL

  56. Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    just didnt get The Matrix in the first place.

    I dont mean to troll, and I'm not. Its just very disapointing to see how many people have now seen two of the three movies, and fail to get the point of it all. You bozo's who think that The Matrix is about Kung-Fu and special effects really need to get your heads out of your asses.

    The entire trilogy is nothing but a philosophy lesson, with some cool shit built into it to drag your asses to the theater. If anything, the films have proven to me just how fucked up and stupid most of us are, when it comes to anything requiring thought.

    Think I'm wrong and just trolling? Here is a challenge: Can anyone tell me the significance of who was laying next to Neo at the cliffhanger? Can you tell me what it means? Not just who it is, but WHY it is? Can you even remember the cat's name?

    Come on, give me a reason to believe that we are all not just a bunch of stupid assholes.

    1. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember the guy's name (didn't think we were given one at the beginning), but it was essentially Agent Smith in somebodys body.

      Agent smith can now move between the matrix and the "real world" it seems, and he is intent on killing neo.

      Why:

      I suspect he's intent on killing neo because neo is basically the only person who can deal with (ie take out) agent smith.

      When Neo jumped into agent smith at the end of the first movie and messed him up, i suspect that it might have left some of the abilities that neo had to escape the control of the matrix with smith. Smith is obviously not being controlled by the matrix any longer (hence the "you freed me" reference near the beginning of the movie).

      What it means:

      Dunno. it means that agent smith can now leave the matrix (through someone elses body, presumably by swallowing the red pill as well). It probably means that there will be a battle for ultimate "control" of the matrix between smith and neo. Hard to say.

      Am i on track with what you were thinking?

    2. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Congrats for thinking, but you didnt get the exact point. Here is another clue. What is the name of the new 'Operator'? That should help.

      Also, consider that Agent Smith is a bigger problem for The Matrix, than he is for Neo.

    3. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by geek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Anyone who gets their philosophy from a Hollywood sci-fi flick is the dumb one. Sorry buddy but your rant was pathetic in the extreme. Want philosophy? Get a library card.

    4. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Thanks, idiot.

      No one GETS philosophy from the Matrix, so thanks for confirming how stupid some of you are.

      The Matrix is only a particular interpretation of a philosophy that most of us should be quite familiar with.

      Those of us whose heads are not up our asses.

      I appreciate the confirmation of my earlier suspicion.

    5. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by geek · · Score: 1

      If we're all idiots then why are you the one making a fool of yourself? You started this off acting like a complete child and are now roaming head on into moron territory.

      Read your first post and think again before rationalizing your diatribe on philosophy. Oh and the subject was my major so don't begin to attempt lecturing me on it.

    6. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      So what? Phi was my minor at the best school on the subject in America. I can only imagine what a sucky school you went to. You could always agree to disagree.

      Better yet, take up the challenge and answer the fucking question!

      But no, that would be too hard I guess. Dont just bitch; prove me wrong, loser.

    7. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the dude on the slab the Agent Smith that made it "out" of the Matrix by using the phone near the beginning of the movie? And probably did the sabotaging they referred to in the Revolutions trailer?

    8. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1

      Getting warmer.

    9. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ***Warning!!*** Spoiler concepts being presented here.

      Agent smith is able to leave the Matrix because he never left the Matrix ;) The Architect is offering Neo a double-bind.....you have two choices, both are what I want you to do....as long as you stay preoccupied with the struggle I created and present to you, I have the Messiah controlled. The only way Neo can succeed is to reject the scenerio and open his eyes. There is a lot more depth in this movie than people credit it with, there is just no way to keep the suspense up for the third movie if they don't obfuscate what's going on in this one.

    10. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by kinglink · · Score: 1

      Some of us believe the Reloaded movie was aweful because of the opposite reason. To little story. Enough action and stuff, Great you can do that but all it felt like was a 2 hour trailer for "The brothers" version of ILM. Big deal.

      Why did ILM take off? because Star Wars was made but Star wars was great. I feel the story in the Matrix reloaded basically beat us over the head in the obvious points, and the questions left open arn't that major.

      I'm sick of people caring more about the kung-fu and special effects then the story too but when the film itself forgets about the story except for about 30 minutes when it is necessary to distinguish it from a trailer, that's called a problem in my book.

    11. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by geek · · Score: 1

      For someone claiming such a great edumacation you sure have a foul mouth. I don't answer stupid questions. I'm also not a movie critic nor have I seen the movie yet.

      My comments were directed at you, your foul mouth and complete lack of real education. I suggest you get your money back from that "best school on the subject in America". You're a complete disgrace. Had you really studied Philosophy at all I would expect a much better reply than "Fuck you idiot moron scumbag dirtwad.... nya nya nya nya nya nya". Grow up.

    12. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      i do agree with you. lot of people didnt even like the first one. the special effects is just a way to deliver points. they brag about the CGs not done to perfection.

      i personally think the dialogs with counseler hanmann (spelling?), oracle and the architect were awesome. they fuck around with our minds even more than the first film, and that's the reason why many of us went to see this film. fortunately we do have a lot of fans that do get the philosophy aspects. take a look at the +5 posts.

    13. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      You think a foul mouth has anything to do with intelligence? My you really are stupid, arent you?

      Now you are just deflecting, because you dont have the answer. Admit it. What a weak reply.

    14. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it your mom?

    15. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name of the new operator is Link... so... that guy is actually Zelda? Wow - that's fucked up.

    16. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by geek · · Score: 1

      Yes a person with a foul mouth is of below average intelligence. If you can't form a sentence without including childish immature language then the chances of you forming an intelligent opinion and understanding adult subject matter are increidbly thin.

      An intelligent and confident adult doesn't resort to name calling and obscenities to prove a point or make a statement. This is how I know you never studied philosophy and why I am beginning to have my doubts you even went to school. One more time, grow up.

    17. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Boy it must suck to be you.

      Deluded, moralistic, and a poor speller to boot.

      Next time you want to discuss someone's intellect, make sure that you can SPELL at the very least.

      Makes me wonder if YOU ever went to school, but then again, you are exactly what public schools are producing today. Tell ya what genius, take the last word, as this is not even a fair fight.

      By the way, thats W-O-R-D, word. LOL!

    18. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by geek · · Score: 1

      You always know when you lost the intellectual debate when you reduce yourself to grammar checking. This is a web forum not a thesis paper. I'll misspell what ever the hell I wish.

      Keep playing the game tho, at this point I'm just chuckling at your stupidity and self righteous B.S. You aren't fooling anyone around here, I can promise you that much.

    19. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by geek · · Score: 1

      Oh and BTW there was one miss-typed word in my last post and you think that gives you the moral high ground? Like I said in my first reply to you, PATHETIC. Now run along child.

    20. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Made ya look!

      This is TOO EASY!!!!!

    21. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, thats a good one.

    22. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Ding Ding DING!

      Give that man a star.

    23. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WARNING: SUPER SPOILER

      The operator's name. Do you mean Link?

      Anyway, my take:

      Two possibilities.
      All humans outside of the Matrix are really still in the Matrix.

      Neo and possibly Morpheus and Trinity are still in the Matrix.

      Because of the freedom the Brothers have to manipulate the "reality" of the plot, I think it is impossible to determine which is the truth, but I will at least explain why I believe that it is one of the two.

      Next to Neo in the final scene is the lone survivor of the Zion destruction. This, of course, is also the same individual that was infected by Agent Smith.

      If what the humans of Zion believe is reality is another level of the Matrix, Agent Smith having been released from the rules of the first level Matrix, could now have the ability to move into the second level.

      If the world of Zion is truly reality, then it would be a bit sloppy to leave in question Agent Smith's ability to infect an unplugged mind. Has he learned some way to reprogram the biological mind of those he infects? Good for plot progression, but I don't think I would have even bothered adding that to the story, considering there are plenty of other ways to to pit the man vs. mind controlling machine against each-other.

      Also, of interest, you do not actually see Neo leave the Matrix and the "Something is different, I can feel them coming" Scene. Is something different because Neo is different or because the Zion world is different? Interestingly, it would also be very messy if the Agent Smith infected character was in the real world Zion and then somehow gets uploaded into the fake Zion world.

      The Oracle is very interesting as well. A program...I like that twist a great deal, but doesn't that confine her knowledge to the experiences of the Matrix. Does she know Neo is not sleeping because his memories are assimilated into the Matrix whenever he inters it or does she know because he never leaves?

      Also, if Neo never really leaves the Matrix, the fact that the Oracle is a program opens up the possibility that Neo is a program.

      The Matrix Architect: Not why am I here, because that question is answered by the choice, but why do I make the choices that I make.

      Sex with the chocolate cake woman, came for the key-maker because the Oracle gave instructions, choose Trinity over saving human existence. We all have a purpose. I know this is right because we are still alive. Tell the Oracle that her time is almost up.

      Do all of these scenes imply that everything has occurred inside of the Matrix and everyone is kept alive until they fulfill their purpose. After purpose fulfillment, you die or rather get deleted?

      Neo's purpose? The One. A cool way to end it...Neo is a program, his purpose is to realize why he makes the choices he makes in order to take artificial intelligence to the level of a truly self aware being. Also, hopefully exploring, in a tolerable manor, the nature of consciousness.

      Another, more likely ending...the Zion world is awoken by Neo and truly freed from their metal prison to find a world where they can live harmoniously with conscious machines. Trinity and Neo get it on real world style.

      Also, it is possible that Neo has been sidetracked by the Architect to an alternate Zion in order to distract him from his task of changing the source. Perhaps some tie in to the kiss he gave that woman, used to record data that will make a fake Trinity more realistic to him. He will figure this out, get back to changing the source, and save Zion from the machines.

      I am hoping that he isn't truly in the real Zion world, where he discovers he has supernatural powers that affect his biological environment. I don't think they would do this. It would be too lame.

      I enjoyed the plot of this movie better than that of the first, because these questions are left unanswered. The only questions left in the first was how much butt is Neo going to kick and how is he going to save the human race. I hope that the answers in the last installment are satisfying. Regardless, I have found both first and second to be extremely entertaining. Great work film-makers...if you are listening.

    24. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Neo is a program, his purpose is to realize why he makes the choices he makes in order to take artificial intelligence to the level of a truly self aware being. Also, hopefully exploring, in a tolerable manor, the nature of consciousness.

      DAMN. Finally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      The Machines know that they will eventually lose to the humans, unless they can that final piece of understanding: The Meaning of Existence. Why are we here? Without that meaning, the machines know that eventually, they will be defeated. Neo is THEIR Jesus, not the humans.

      Agent Smith is their Devil, and he is ahead of the Machines in gaining this understanding. Without Neo, Agent Smith will destroy both the Machines and Humans. Neo is essentially an anti-virus program for Smith; which is fucking up the harmony of the Machine-Human interdependence.

      Once Smith is defeated, the Humans will gladly choose to be in the Matrix, unaware that they actually never left.

      No one should have made the assumption that all of the Machines that control the Matrix are getting along with one another. As Smith gathers strength he is a threat to the entire system as a whole.

    25. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek, if you really want to be better than someone, you don't stoop to their level, and just ignore them. The fact that you can't do that just shows your stupidity. I don't even want to write this message, as I've stated earlier, it's better to ignore you, but I think it's time someone let you in on some common sense.

      And as for using foul language on some internet site: that doesn't really give you any idea how intelligent a person is. The internet is all about anonimity and giving incomplete impressions.

      If you actually read what LibertineR had to say, he makes a great and unique point.

      Maybe next time, before you mouth off, you may take some time, look around, and actually think about why you're mouthing off in the first place. After all, isn't that what the Matrix: Reloaded is all about ?

      Cosmin.

    26. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, I can not remember the name of the other guy on the other table.
      No, I don't know why he was cutting himself with a knife, and stalking Neo in Zion.
      No, I don't know why the Source building was wired to blow up.
      No, I don't know why the dance (was in no way an orgy) sequence was even filmed. But I do know why it went on so long. Because it cost so much to film.
      No, I don't know why the keymaker made keys.
      No, I don't know why the french guy has been arround for 6 iterations. I guess he just likes hot babes.
      Yes, I do know why the hot babe brunette sequence went on so long. That is one hot babe.
      No, I don't remember the name of the pilot of the ship.
      Yes, the highway sequence is woth the price of the ticket.
      No, I can't understand how anyone would find the basis for a significant philisophical discussion in this silly movie.

    27. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was the guy at the beginning who was mindwiped by Agent Smith. He set off the EMP prematurely to shut down the defenses. I believe his name is "Bane".

      And I am guessing that he'll be serious trouble in the next episode.

      And yes, I liked the movie.

    28. Re:Anyone who thinks that Reloaded sucks; by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      > Not just who it is, but WHY it is?

      I may have completely the wrong end of the stick...could Agent Smith be The One? He was the only survivor from the fall of Zion...

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  57. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by gnarled · · Score: 1

    What the hell are you talking about? Did you see the movie, or did you just read a buncha whiney negative reviews? What did he sacrifice to saver her? Sure theres a love interest in the movie, but that hasn't eclipsed the real story there at all.

    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
  58. Matrix Revolutionized to $32 Million Opening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nah, don't know if that would sound right... number might be too high

  59. Shut up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without the Matrix, my life is without meaning. Why can't we all just get along?

  60. Freeing, Reclaiming Your Mind by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    You're right, I suppose, but I wouldn't say there was no messing with Neo's mind. The plot was consistent with surprises (from Neo's point of view) -- upgrades, Agent Smith(s), the Twins, Super Mario Bros 2-style doors (hah), and... well, you know what happened in the last half hour. His reality was torn to bits when his mind was "freed" in the first film. Now his reality on top of his dream has been torn again.

    Let's put it this way: If the first movie's goal was to convince Neo, as Trinity stated, "that the Matrix can not tell you who you are", then the second movie's goal was to convince Neo to reconsider that.

    And let's not forget that, by the end of the film, they were messing with Morpheus' head and thus our heads, not to mention Neo's final bit of action at the end of the movie...

    Oh yeah, they're still messing with our heads. And you'd better bet that in order for Revolutions to be successful, they're going to have to wrap up this chapter of the Matrix story while leaving us as flabbergasted as before.

  61. Violence attracts crowds (spoiler) don't mod up by Idou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was listening to part of a program on NPR that was saying that the Matrix had to use violence to attract people in order to get its message through. As a sequel, the violence must be better than the previous movie. I was annoyed too, but maybe this says more about the kind of society we live in than what kind of judgement was used in making the movie. The second half of the movie made it well worth it.

    So since this is a spoiler thread, do you think all we have seen so far has been inside the matrix? Instead of having 5 "rebirths" of "the one", the same Neo has had to go through the same story over and over again. We are told that everyone has to make a choice to accept the Matrix, at a certain level. Are the machines trying to crush Neo's hope and get him to accept the Matrix as reality by giving him false hope, over and over again? Was the Matrix fully "reloaded" this time around? I see a new Matrix game coming out that has the Matrix "reloaded" instead of you dying.

    This movie has left me much more puzzled than the first one . . .

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Violence attracts crowds (spoiler) don't mod up by crashfrog · · Score: 1

      Not violence; conflict. Conflict is the source of narrative. Conflict is what allows boring philosophy to be explored as part of an engaging story. Otherwise you're reading a textbook. Textbooks don't make good movies.

      Now, as it happens, the most exciting, visual form of narrative conflict is violent, physical conflict. The stakes are higher so it's more exciting.

      Why is this a negative thing?

      --
      I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
      If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
    2. Re:Violence attracts crowds (spoiler) don't mod up by sllim · · Score: 1

      I am convinced that Neo is not 'The One'.
      Trinity is.

      I'll be quick, you can fill in the holes yourself.

      Smith told Neo that Neo had 'overwritten' Smith's programming when Neo entered Smith.
      Inside the Matrix they are all programs, Neo, Trinity, Smith - everyone and everything.

      So it really isn't a stretch to think that Neo entering Trinity could have a similar effect on Trinity as it did on Smith.

      I am telling you Trinity is 'The One.'.

    3. Re:Violence attracts crowds (spoiler) don't mod up by Idou · · Score: 1

      I'll add to your theory:

      Morpheus makes a speech about how this could not be coincidence, three ships, three something, and three something else.

      Plus, Trinity forces Neo's choice of which door he takes.

      Anyway, we'll know for sure this fall.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    4. Re:Violence attracts crowds (spoiler) don't mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dang. it's just another groundhog's day rip-off. CURSE YOU, MURRAY!!!

    5. Re:Violence attracts crowds (spoiler) don't mod up by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      So it really isn't a stretch to think that Neo entering Trinity could have a similar effect on Trinity as it did on Smith.

      Yeah, the scene with Neo "entering" Trinity did seem to have quite the effect on her...

      Oh, wait. I bet you were talking about the second time, with the whole CPR thing... never mind.

  62. Re:Yeah, lots of dopes who didnt get the film at a by MisterFancypants · · Score: 2, Funny
    All I know is, if I ever get the sense that I might be dead within 24 hours, Monica Belluci better not be within driving distance of me, or she is going to get more from me than what Neo gave her.

    So rape is now a celebration of the human spirit? You sick fuck.

  63. Amazing!! by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

    Obviusly, that scene means that the production team hired a real hacker to consult him about computer stuff. Like, "When you try to access another computer, do you really see big red letters saying 'Acces denied!'?..."

    Any ideas who might be the happy hacker that led the Wachowski brothers in the right path?

    Reloaded will start showing the 22th here in Panamá... I'll make sure I carefully read the credits at the end.

    1. Re:Amazing!! by Hanji · · Score: 1

      When you try to access another computer, do you really see big red letters saying 'Acces denied!'?

      Well, I don't know about you, but that's how my server's configured! :-)

      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    2. Re:Amazing!! by Build6 · · Score: 1

      Any ideas who might be the happy hacker that led the Wachowski brothers in the right path?

      Do we know that they themselves don't muck about with computers and would therefore personally be familiar with *nix etc.?

    3. Re:Amazing!! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any ideas who might be the happy hacker that led the Wachowski brothers in the right path?

      Most likely some guy from their special effects company -- they have more than enough programmers there, and considering that they used mostly FreeBSD for the first movie, it's likely that a lot of Unix programmers worked on this one, too. It's even possible that directors just asked for a realistic-looking screen with some exploit, and whoever made it, chosen nmap and then-just-published ssh bug.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  64. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by owlicks58 · · Score: 1

    Yes I saw the movie and I don't see how you can't see that it's pretty much just a love story. I have a hard time seeing any deep philosophical meaning in it, certainly nothing that's new or exciting. The architect told him he could continue the system and everything would start over, or he could continue in this world and crash the system (which would mean he had a chance to save her) He decided he wanted to take that chance purely based on the fact that he didn't want to see her die. That part of the story line just had far too much emphasis for me. If you disagree, fine, but try to look at the story line objectively, and tell me it's not just a glorified love story with 20 minute special effect fight scenes now.

    --
    -Alex
  65. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

    Uhhh... according to The Architect, he sacrificed the entire human race by not going through the door on his right.

    --
    Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
  66. Everything has a purpose by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    From a larger analysis of the movie at

    http://www.icarusindie.com

    Everything that has happened in The Matrix has happened for a reason. This idea of "purpose" is laid down thick in "Reloaded." Cause and effect. The most pointless scene in all of Matrix: Reloaded was the love scene. It was painfully out of place. It may just be a red haring. It may have just been a poor attempt at selling tickets. My theory is that it will play a role in the final Matrix. I'm hoping it won't be a blatant rip off of Star Wars where everyone though Anakin was "The One" while it turns out it was his son and Anakin actually ends up being evil. I believe there will be a baby however the purpose of that baby may simply be to leave room for another trilogy. Or it may play a role in breaking free of what is really controlling everyone.

    -----------

    After writing that I believe the Matrix is playing with the snake which eats it's own tale theme. Neo is either his own father or the son of God who will destroy his father and who's son will be destined to one day destroy him. This plays with the standard Greek storyline that Gods would bear children destined to destroy them so they would devise ways to keep their children from learning their destiny in an effort to maintain their control.

    Either way, I believe Neo is both responsible for the enslavement of mankind and the source of it's freedom.

    The prophecy is the control which keeps Neo on this circular path. Now that he has love he may otherthrow "God" but choose not to become greedy and seek more power resulting in the circle going around one more time.

    We may either see that Neo raises his son to love his father thus breaking the cycle or that there is no free will and we learn WHY the choices were made that keep the circle going. It's a matter of considering what point the authors are trying to make.

    In Red Dwarf it was simply accepted that Lister was his own father and that nothing can change destiny. That may be the case with The Matrix as well. Either way it would be a satisfactory conclusion.

    Ben

    1. Re:Everything has a purpose by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      "I'm hoping it won't be a blatant rip off of Star Wars where everyone though Anakin was "The One" while it turns out it was his son and Anakin actually ends up being evil"

      I think you missed the point of being "the one" in the star wars prequals... "The One" was supposed to bring a balance to the force. Thus, since most of the force was already lopsided tward the "good" side, anakin being "the one" (which he was) evened the score by turning "bad"

      After anakin, there was never a "the one" again, and luke was just a random, not as powerful jedi that convinced his father to spare his life, thus ending the dark side. Since luke was the last jedi at that time (nobody gives any hint that there will be more jedis), the force stayed (somewhat) balanced starting from the point that anakin went to the dark side.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    2. Re:Everything has a purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a "Red Haring" like a "Keith Haring"? Did I miss ome pop-art icon, here?

    3. Re:Everything has a purpose by hswerdfe · · Score: 1
      In Red Dwarf it was simply accepted that Lister was his own father and that nothing can change destiny. That may be the case with The Matrix as well. Either way it would be a satisfactory conclusion.


      WHAT!!!!

      dude, what season is this revealed in???
      what episode???

      I haven't seen all of them, only I think the first 4

      I know I havn't seen any with Kachanski....

      so like what happens....hows it happen....whats going on.....I want details.....

      I remember the episode where he has sex with a female him from another unverse and gets pregnent....I don't remember a birth or anything....

      I also remember the the first season seeing a vision of himself with kids....is one of them him?

      Ohhh...:(

      I am so confused....

      If only I owned a TV!!!

      --
      --meh--
  67. Real opening amount (adjusted for inflation)? by Eol1 · · Score: 1

    What I would like to see is a list of movie records adjusted for inflation. Every time I see a *new opening record* or *highest grossing movie of all time* I immediately think bullshit, just marketting leading the sheeple on.

    I would like to see numbers adjusted not only for inflation, but also amount of tickets sold, screens shown at, etc etc. For example, I figure a movie that opens only in the midwest selling out every available ticket would rate higher than a nation wide opening selling 50% of tickets.

    Just because a record is broken doesn't make it popular movie. If I could manage to show a movie in EVERY theatre worldwide and sell only 5% of the seats at each showing, I also could smash records. Theatres would be empty, but due to shear numbers I would win.

    --
    De Oppresso Liber
    1. Re:Real opening amount (adjusted for inflation)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.the-movie-times.com
      www.boxofficemojo.com

    2. Re:Real opening amount (adjusted for inflation)? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      If I could manage to show a movie in EVERY theatre worldwide and sell only 5% of the seats at each showing, I also could smash records. Theatres would be empty, but due to shear numbers I would win.

      Well, yeah, because more people would see it than any other movie before. I don't see what the theater being empty or not has to do with it, the point is how many people are seeing the movie.

  68. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Catnapster · · Score: 1

    In fact, the Architect (white beard dude) made a point of it: the One's love of humanity (which was part of what made him the One) was much more general the first five times around, but now it was focused on one individual - Trinity.

    So it's saying, in effect, that Neo's love for Trinity is part of what makes him the One.

    --
    The world can be wrong today for once.
  69. Hence, the violence and sex scenes . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "Unfortunately, I think that is going to be missed on the vast majority of the movie watchers."

    Hopefully the violence and sex scenes will help people digest those more advanced ideas like "a little sugar makes the medicine go down."

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  70. Re:Lets all shut the fuck up about The Matrix. Mmk by straycheck · · Score: 1
    It took an Oscar for "Spirited Away" to get big.

    Nice to see some good old fashioned cultural elitism. If you check box office results for Japan, you'll find out that "Spirited Away" was the highest grossing domestic film in Japan ever. And it was the third highest grossing film in Japan after "Titanic" and "Harry Potter." This was before the Oscars.

  71. Ghostbusters by Dwedit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anyone else think 'Ghostbusters' when they started talking about the Keymaker?

    "Are you the gatekeeper?"
    "I am the Keymaster!"

    1. Re:Ghostbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bwahaha yes, same kinda dorky little man too!

  72. Which Sequel was Worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This god-awful Matrix sequel, or the god-awful Highlander sequel?

    I think the Highlander Sequel(s) were somewhat worse, because the Matrix II didn't actually *completely* ruin the experience of the first movie. However, it did somewhat ruin the experience of the first movie, and that's pretty bad.

    Definitely one of those sequels I wish I had never seen, so as not to screw-up my relationship of the original movie.

    Maybe there should be a /. poll of "worst sequel ever"...

    1. Re:Which Sequel was Worse? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      "Maybe there should be a /. poll of "worst sequel ever"..."

      You certainly won't find The Matrix : Crapload on it. It's near blasphomy to dislike The Matrix or anything related to it on slashdot. And after all, if you don't love the film and walk around wearing a black leather trench coat, sunglasses at night and dwelling on the philosophical value of a bloated action film than you obviously just don't get it... YOU DONT GET IT!!!! {RAGE}

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  73. The ending by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    *** WARNING *** SPOILER *** WARNING *** SPOILER ***

    Bambi's mother gets shot by a hunter! WTF was up with that?

    Acually, I haven't seen the new Matrix movie yet, but I was feeling left out because I hadn't written a spoiler warning yet. I feel better now.

  74. Re:Yeah, lots of dopes who didnt get the film at a by LibertineR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shut up, asshole. She wants me.

  75. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    Would that be the "ENTIRE" human race, or the pink nuggets in all the tanks? There are lots of fully-functioning humans in Zion that could probably create a new planet alone. They have plenty of genetic diversity.

  76. Yeah we chipped in... by WileEDingo · · Score: 1

    I was one of 7 people in the theatre for a matinee on opening day. Paid a whole $4/ticket. Wow, that's 28 bucks right there!

  77. I think there was a synch glitch in the Matrix by Kjella · · Score: 1

    The problem was fixed in 10 minutes, but it was impossible to rewind and show the missed two minutes, said Harkins' Jackie Faubus. People who left were given two movie passes each. Those who stayed got coupons for free popcorn.

    They fixed the problem in 10 minutes, but only missed 2 minutes of the movie? Sounds like something out of the plot, with the Matrix out of synch, I guess the Matrix has to be some kind of distributed network with multiple clocks...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:I think there was a synch glitch in the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fixed the problem in 10 minutes, but only missed 2 minutes of the movie?

      Or maybe they shut the projector off after two minutes and took another eight to fix it.

      Crazy math, I know.

    2. Re:I think there was a synch glitch in the Matrix by feldy · · Score: 1

      They fixed the problem in 10 minutes, but only missed 2 minutes of the movie? Sounds like something out of the plot, with the Matrix out of synch, I guess the Matrix has to be some kind of distributed network with multiple clocks...

      Umm, so much for Occam's razor... The bulb probably burned out and they weren't able to stop the platter for 2 minutes... Then it probably took them another 8 minutes to replace the project bulb and crank it up again. Not that complicated to reason out...

      Feldy

    3. Re:I think there was a synch glitch in the Matrix by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > They fixed the problem in 10 minutes, but only
      > missed 2 minutes of the movie?

      "Don't worry about it. You just missed Morpheus almost falling off the truck 6 more times."

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  78. what about the budget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering what the budget for the movie was.. anyone knows?

  79. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by tmortn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SPOILER DO not READ further if you HAVE not SEEN and dont WANT to KNOW.

    Is it just me or has everyone missed the fact NEO messed with the supposedly 'real' world at the end ? They are still in the Matrix. There is more than one. Zion is a Matrix, one built with different rules, a different purpose. It serves the needs of the phophecy. The question is if NEO can break the cycle.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  80. Numbers are askew... by mraymer · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know if the $42.5 million is including the sales for Wednesday showings? The film started showing at 10 PM Wednesday in some places...

    I know The Numbers said they'd try to break down the earnings by day if they could, but it appears that they haven't yet.

    So, basically, this opening figure could be exaggerated a little.

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:Numbers are askew... by doogles · · Score: 1

      http://www.boxofficemojo.com/ is what I use when I'm trying to gauge a movie's box office performance. It breaks things down by day.

  81. People walked out during the Zion "Dance" by stecker · · Score: 1

    I saw the movie yesterday, and I was shocked when a number of people walked out in the middle of the Zion "dance" scene. I'm totally flummoxed by this, as I thought it was one of the coolest scenes in the film. I suppose that not many of the Matrix's core audiences have been to dances like that before.

    In fact, the only moment of the whole film where I had a genuine "woah" reaction was the moment during this scene when the music shifted from the Zion music to the club-house-dance music and the camera style abruptly changed. Something about that instant was amazing.

    Did anyone catch Princeton's Black History professor Cornel West as one of the Zion rulers? Awesome.

    1. Re:People walked out during the Zion "Dance" by warrped · · Score: 1

      Yes! I was hoping someone else would have noticed that... it's cool that Cornel West would do something (again) that is likely to irritate his peers (who accused him of playing to the masses when he released that spoken-word CD of his). And I agree that the dance scene was very cool, although my friends hated it. I get the sense that a personal experience inspired that scene, just as personal experience made it more endearing to me. A lot of electronic musicicans draws inspiration from science fiction, and it's great to see the relationship become reciprocal. IMO, what makes the Matrix movies so interesting are their subtextual content. That Zion rave scene suggests a wealth of commentary on issues that just seem to pass under the radar of your average individual... a shame really, but then it's also fun to think you understood more of what the Wachowskis were trying to get across. =D

      --
      - Bachelorhood is the father of necessity.
    2. Re:People walked out during the Zion "Dance" by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was watching it for the second time, and having had too much beer between work and movie, I decided it was a better time serve out part of my slavery to causality.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:People walked out during the Zion "Dance" by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      That's when I left to take a piss.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    4. Re:People walked out during the Zion "Dance" by Yer+Mum · · Score: 1

      I was shocked when a number of people walked out in the middle of the Zion "dance" scene. I'm totally flummoxed by this, as I thought it was one of the coolest scenes in the film.

      Something from a an inteview with one of the actresses in Calendar Girls...

      Like the calendar itself, the £1.5m film is perfectly demure. Celia Imrie, whose bosoms are in one scene shielded by a pair of iced cherry tarts, said: "The Americans are very prudish, so you don't see that much, thank God. Even so, we had to be naked on set at various times, which was a bit scary."

  82. Oh, please -- Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    [Spoilage -- unless you don't plan to see it, because you didn't like the first (might change your mind)]

    The humans as batteries thing in the first one was complete idiocy. Even for science fiction, using human body heat as an enormously efficient energy supply is absurd. For this reason, I absouletly hated the first and didn't even want to see the next one.

    But I did. And I'm glad, because all that nonsense battery business is now just part of Morpheus's Fantasy/Prophecy and the real nature of the Matrix is beginning to become apparent. The Matrix no longer seems to be as self-contained as before. When the sentinels are hunting down Neo, et al., somehow Neo understands more and is able to take them down, just like bullets in the Matrix. This leads us to believe that the so called real world, where Zion is, is also part of some larger Matrix. So why is there a inner and outer Matrix? Perhaps it has something to do with the Architect trying to prevent the anomaly in his system from taking over too soon. Thankfully that makes all that Prophetic Man v Machine Luddite garbage just another safe guarding layer created in fantasy to keep the system from going down.

    If you ask ask me, by the time the 'Matrix: Reloaded' is over -- and if you did manage to stay out of the meaningless subplots -- you realize that just about everything has become meaningless, and the roles previous played have been abandoned.

    Neo no longer seems organic, but more a contrived 'program' there trying to to become more than what his parameters allow him. Likewise Smith no longer feels so mechanistic: he is 'unplugged', and his fevor for everything shows deep undirected metaphysical angst.

    So who are the characters? Why do they exist?

    The only clues we're left with come from the Oracle and the Architect. I'm not completely sure of all of that -- I've got to go see it again -- but here's what I've gathered so far.

    The Orcale hints at the nested nature of the Matrix by telling Neo that he need not consider what he will do, but only why he will do it. Considering what a matrix is in mathematics, I find this similar to a scalar acting on a matrix: we could consider a scalar and a matrix (analgous to Neo and the Matrix) as two separate entities with one acting on the other, but ultimately what they form is simply another matrix. Having understood this Neo no longer is forced to choose his steps, only to understand why he takes them. It's really an interesting philosophical development into the role of Neo and the containment of the Matrix.

    As for hints given by the Architect, there's always the fact that he refers to Neo as 'still human.' I'm taking this as an indication that his purpose is to become more. What? We'll have to wait and see.

    Anybody else out there with some insight, especially those unlike me, who have seen it twice?

    [/Spoliage]

    1. Re:Oh, please -- Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, somebody who gets it! If only you weren't AC, or I weren't AC and had mods.

    2. Re:Oh, please -- Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      work with me here:

      you have an inner matrix, neo is unplugged from it and we are led to believe that everything outside is real. but this reality turns out to be an outer matrix.

      so what is outside the outer matrix? reality? i believe there is no reality outside, and that neo, trinity, morpheus et al are all just simulations, and not real people at all. the planet was destroyed completely and the entire matrix is a small reinforced metal box floating in space, the last remaining artifact of humanity's existence.

      how's that for your twist ending.

    3. Re:Oh, please -- Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. I think the machine world is the real world and Neo just acquired super powers unlocking the full potential of the human body/mind through his training in the matrix.

    4. Re:Oh, please -- Re:Bah! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > so what is outside the outer matrix? reality?

      Dwane Dibley? Dwane Dibley!!?!?!?

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  83. On the hole, preperation h does feel good... by lpret · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the Goldmember quote, but...

    Remember that this a part of the trilogy as a whole. I really think any criticisms of this movie by itself can, and will, be silenced when we finally see Revolutions, and the see all three in a row -- totallly immersing ourselves in the world of the Matrix. (Sounds like marketing, but think about it) If you think about a normal plot sequence in any story (book, movie, etc.) this is how it usually is (for those of you who forgot freshmen english):

    |Rising *** <-- Climax
    |Action ** *
    | | ** *
    | V ** ** <-- Falling (or Resolution)
    | ** **
    ------------------

    Matrix Reloaded is the top two lines, little character development, little plot preperation (even not necessarily any plot development), and some critical elements to the story. This key element in Reloaded is Choice. However, that doesn't make the first half (which is more discovery of himself and the system he exists in) any less important -- as Karl Menninger noted "To "know thyself" must mean to know the malignancy of one's own instincts and to know, as well, one's power to deflect it." Very apropos don't you think?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  84. In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by crashnbur · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Before I say anything, you have to understand that "grievances" with anything relating to The Matrix would barely register as a speck of dust in a pile of sand for any other film. That said, my barely worthy complaints regard:

    1. The Orgy Scene
    2. The Twins
    3. Neo and Trinity

    1. This is my biggest and only real complaint about the movie. This scene lasted much too long. At first, I could not even imagine a purpose for the scene, but someone in this comment forum has carelessly yet effectively explained how the scene's purpose was to illustrate the humans' love for real life. When humanity itself is threatened and you are the occupants of the last human city, you can bet that the primal instincts are going to come out and play. Still, I think the scene could have been significantly shortened. (Then again, there's no telling whose faces we might see if we look slowly and carefully through the scene when the DVD is released.)

    2. I'm not sure if I am disappointed or relieved, but I feel like the Twins were showcased more in the trailers than the movie warranted. Or perhaps the point was to lead us to believe that their role was more prominent than it is in order to surprise us with Agent Smith, whose scenes surpassed everything I had imagined prior to seeing the film. Either way, I feel like they could have done more or played a role closer to the center of the plot, but as things are, they should still be around for the third installment...

    3. Okay, this is just the teenage boy in me, and maybe this can be an outtake, a spoof, or something else later, but why don't Neo and Trinity "play" around in the Construct? Can you imagine the limits they could reach with the ability to program various skills, ideas, locales into their minds? The possibilities are endless! Matrix p0rn! (Okay, the end.)

    Finally, it must be said that the visual effects were awesome, Rob Dougan's and Juno Factor's music was killer, and, well, there isn't enough to be said about the story. Great movie. I plan to see it several times more ... before I turn 21 in July.

    1. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by Kirijini · · Score: 1

      "...Rob Dougan's and Juno Factor's music was killer..."

      I'd have to disagree. Most of the time during the movie I painfully aware of the soundtrack. In other words, the music selection and place was, in my opinion, bad. What I remember (it's been about 24 hours since I saw the thing, and I wasn't actively trying to analyze the music, so forgive any errors) was a lot of rock/electronica music moving at a different tempo than the action in the scenes. Plus, during many of the dramatic parts the music was melodramatic or overbearing. I remember the music of the first Matrix was perfect, especially when Neo stops the bullets. This time around? Mostly hard beats (bum bum BUM) to try to emphasize something.

      If there's any one thing that irritated me about this movie, it was the soundtrack.

    2. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by Wrexen · · Score: 1

      Regarding point #1:

      I already posted this elsewhere in the thread, but it's probably going to get buried, so here it is again without The Bonus

      I think this was a parallel to Buddhism. Neo is clearly a Buddha figure (enlightenment (being The One) allows him to escape from the suffering of the Matrix), and if you read Buddhist texts they tell how the Buddha was a rich man that enjoyed nothing but worldly pleasures. The dance/sex scene was showing that in the world of Zion, Neo is not yet enlightened and is still a part of the unenlightened activities. Contrast this to the end of the movie where he is enlightened in the world of Zion (you know what I'm talking about, so no need for a spoiler here)

    3. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding Point #3:

      "Hello, operator? ... We need a towel."

      "Oh, and don't look."

    4. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by MyHair · · Score: 1
      I plan to see it several times more ... before I turn 21 in July.


      I didn't realize there was an age limit. They didn't card me and I'm well over 21...
    5. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1 I dont know how much 'real life' the orgy scene was. It seemed more like a want for a lack of control. Also, if you had to eat that white slop (from the first film) and live in a cave after becoming free, you might want to spend your time naked. Real zion-born people seemed to hold more social status then the copper-tops who were once part of the matrix...

      #3 They wanted to be alone. You can't be alone in the matrix. Every operator is watching it, and the machines are taking readings and anticipating your future events... they could never get any real alone time. Too much big brother!

    6. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by schon · · Score: 1

      You can't be alone in the matrix. Every operator is watching it ... they could never get any real alone time. Too much big brother!

      Demonstratably false - "Mr. Reagan" (Cypher) didn't seem to have a problem.

      I think the real reason is that Neo doesn't want to have to clean the splooge off the inside of his trousers afterwards :o)

    7. Re:In Retrospect, Some Grievances (spoilers!) by Zorikin · · Score: 1

      We have a rule. We never
      free a mind once it's reached a certain age. It's dangerous, the mind has trouble letting go.

  85. I'm worried about the next movie by elliotj · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen it mentioned in this thread, so it's either so obvious that everyone got it, or nobody did:

    At the end of the movie, it becomes clear that what we have come to know as the world outside of the matrix is still happening INSIDE the matrix.

    We know this b/c the Architect states that with each iteration, the machines become more adept at drilling down to Zion, and because Neo finds he can use his powers outside in the so-far-known real world.

    What worries me about the third installment is how they will justify this. The first movie was great because it had simple themes. By saying, "oops, fooled you, they're still in the matrix even when they're not", I worry that it will end up being super lame.

    1. Re:I'm worried about the next movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are on point-I don't know how many people got that but I thought the Architect made it fairly clear when he stated that it was the 6th version and that they took 16 females and 7 males to restart Zion with each version (could almost smell 6 mini prequels with that statement)but I think in about 6 months all the questions will be answered! I hope!!

    2. Re:I'm worried about the next movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I don't know if you watched the trailer of Matrix Revolutions after the credits, but I just downloaded one on BitTorrent and in a scene, we hear Neobe say: "Neo, He's fighting for us".

      Don't know for you, but it sounds that Neo will be a program after all. That or Neo will be sad at the beginning and will decide to fight for humanity even if he knows Zion is just another Matrix. I'm just not sure if it's a good ending. But I can be wrong. Just download it at http://news.gametab.com/torrents.php and tell me what you think. Thanks.

    3. Re:I'm worried about the next movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What worries me about the third installment is how they will justify this. The first movie was great because it had simple themes. By saying, "oops, fooled you, they're still in the matrix even when they're not", I worry that it will end up being super lame.

      All I can tell you is that you really shouldn't worry so much

  86. what about sex INSIDE the matrix? by QEDog · · Score: 1

    Come on! he is the one... imagine all the creative stuff he could pull of having sex inside the matrix...

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:what about sex INSIDE the matrix? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Mild Spoiler alert!

      Especially like at the end, between Nero and Trinity, it would be funny if Trinity would say, "Would you get your hands OUT of me!"
      Or, like the scene where the machivelian gave that girl some cake, Nero could just directly affect Trinity in a similar way.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:what about sex INSIDE the matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nero, huh? So you think Keanu is just going to fiddle while Zion burns?

  87. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by pVoid · · Score: 1
    Yes, the feeling of danger was definitely lacking.

    Although I really liked the issues about choice indeed, I found that the Agents, and even Agent Smith himself had lost their potency from the first one.

    In the first matrix facing an agent was nearly the end of the world... Whereas in this one, it was merely business as usual.

    And also, the agents seemed to know exactly where they were at all times, unless they used the keymaker backdoors. In the first matrix, they had to deal with agents, but also with regular people... After all, the matrix is huge, it shouldn't be trivial for an agent to pinpoint where Trinity is. But in this one, as soon as Trinity so much as punched someone, plop, an agent would appear.

    Overall though, I really liked some parts of this movie. Definitely.

  88. Those who are ticked off at the movie are dumb by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    this is a new part of the movie now.Neo is the one and 50% of the movie takes place in Xion/not in the matrix. this part of the story is not about running around being terrorists in the matrix it is about trying to kill the matrix and having to contend with rouge programs etc.

    god if you don't want the story line to move forward then just keep watching the first one on repeat.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:Those who are ticked off at the movie are dumb by kinglink · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The fact of the matters is the story takes about 30 minutes to accuretly explain... to monkeys.

      50 percent of the movie in zion is fine. (check your spelling)

      But 75 percent of the movie being devoid of anything relating to the story is NOT. That's what most people are complaining about.

    2. Re:Those who are ticked off at the movie are dumb by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      so what is not relaiting to the story? please explain. the machines are coming to destroy zion. that is part of the story. so the defence of zion is importent. the politics are importent. neo getting to the architect is part of the story becasue the oricle told him to do it. the oricle told him to do it because she is part of the error correction system to keep the one from causeing any damage to the machines' power system.

      explain how this is not part of the story. just becasue you hate the fact that the first movie was all bullshit(the ideas in the movie) does not mean this movie is not following the story.

      so please explain to me where this movie does not follow the story line.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Those who are ticked off at the movie are dumb by JM_the_Great · · Score: 1

      actually, that 50% in Zion (not Xion) was still in a Matrix (there no longer is "the" Matrix). Didn't you see the end? :)

      As for Neo being "the one", I think we need to stop thinking about him as a sort of Jesus Christ figure. To be exact, he's the sixth... the sixth incarnation of what? I'd personally guess he's an AI the human "architect" is trying to perfect... but that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

      --

      --Justin Mitchell
      "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
    4. Re:Those who are ticked off at the movie are dumb by kinglink · · Score: 1

      The fact he is the sixth incarnation or not. he is still jesus. If jesus came back tommorow and then the next day (dying the first day or something) that's the third known incarnation? does it make him any less jesus?

      The fact remains that Neo as a reincarnation is still god like.

      Now as for the "matrix" being outside the matrix. That is still unknown (but more likely then not)

    5. Re:Those who are ticked off at the movie are dumb by kinglink · · Score: 1

      "The fact of the matters is the story takes about 30 minutes to accuretly explain... to monkeys." Thanks for proving the point. It's still not deep enough.

  89. 250,000 people in 100 years by feldy · · Score: 1

    I agree with you... I thought the orgy/dance scene was relevant in that it showed that humans were living creatures with an animalistic drive to reproduce.

    In the last Matrix thread, someone reasoned that it was possible for 23 people to produce 250,000 in only 100 years. Also keep in mind that not all inhabitants of Zion would be direct descendants of the original chosen 23. Some, like Neo, would have been freed from the Matrix and brought to Zion. In fact, at one point, Morpheus mentions that they had freed more people from the Matrix in the last 6 months than they had in the previous 6 years.

    Feldy

  90. SPOILER: NEO DY by Eigenray · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...mium is the 60th element.

  91. All you all missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The matix reloaded is not about philosophy, it's not about art or kung fu or CG techniques. It's all about getting you and everybody you know to buy a ticket and then a DVD and then the special edition DVD. It's the money stupid. And this movie is and will be a spectacular success.

    Other than that it reminded me of Tron.

  92. What, no danger? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Neo can still be hurt, and every time they got into a potential battle I was sensing the danger. I didn't really feel danger when Neo fought Agent Smith after seeing the Oracle, but I did feel it when everyone else dealth with Agents and rogue programs.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:What, no danger? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Remember when Morpheus had his head smashed into the toilet in the first movie? I still grimace at that. Or when the agents are punching through walls and people are spitting up blood after fighting them.

      In this one, I never felt anybody was in danger. People seemed overly confident when fighting agents, who were supposed to be so menacing in the first one to the point that people just ran like hell.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:What, no danger? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      With Neo on your side, maybe you'd be a bit more confident fighting them.

    3. Re:What, no danger? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Neo wasn't there when they were fighting them.

      In any case, it lessens the sense of danger.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  93. Re:TRINITY DIES!!! OMFG! :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone want to explain to me how someone gets resurrected without dying?

  94. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    no fool, he is not in a matrix, he has melded with smith and smith whith him. neo can leverage his phycic powers to connect to the machines and destroy them now.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  95. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    remember in the begining..."upgrades"

    hello!!!! shesh

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  96. Now, now... by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    The first time you saw the first film, you were just as much baffled by such talk as "she got out" (simply put, but the scene itself was baffling) and "...a prison for your mind" or "any software still hardwired to the system..." (no one knew what the hell Morpheus was talking about until they saw the film for the second time)...

    Cut the Wachowskis some slack. You didn't get the first Matrix the first time, and Reloaded is every bit as much fun as the first. The simple dialog was still there, and this one was a lot funnier too! "WHERE'S MY PUS--..." Nice. ;-)

    1. Re:Now, now... by eatenn · · Score: 1
      "The first time you saw the first film, you were just as much baffled by such talk..."

      Really? I didn't realize we saw the movie together! Especially surprising, since the script was so articulate everyone I went with understood it (including myself).

      ...and "...a prison for your mind" or "any software still hardwired to the system..." (no one knew what the hell Morpheus was talking about until they saw the film for the second time)...

      "A prison for your mind" is a lot easier to understand than "There were certain programming algorithms that caused a disfunction in the Matrix due to the replicated infusion of several one-eyed test monkeys that brought optical processing mechanisms to the Matrix."

      Cut the Wachowskis some slack. You didn't get the first Matrix the first time, and Reloaded is every bit as much fun as the first.

      You're sitting here telling me what my opinion of a movie is. That's crazy. It comes down to personal opinion. I respect yours enough to not tell you what YOUR opinion is, I'm entitled to the same respect.

      --
      "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    2. Re:Now, now... by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      You've obviously misinterpreted me. I didn't declare your opinions for you. Nice assumption, though.

      And, so you know, the Wachowskis wrote the stories to all three films long before the script for the first one was finalized. The entire thing is the story as they saw it years ago. To suggest that Reloaded has lost some of the original's flavor due to the time gap is to completely ignore the fact that the trilogy was essentially complete before the first film was made.

      p.s.-- Easy on the sarcasm. It's difficult enough to find quality /. comments without it.

    3. Re:Now, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong.

      those who saw the first fell into 3 camps:

      those who understood.

      those who didn't

      those who didn't,but had someone explain it to them later.

      this film was not good. i understood both as it unfolded.

      it's simply not a good movie.

      was the cg at times impressive?

      yes. the movie still sucked.

      i'm sure perfectly impressive CG clip of a ostrich taking a shit could be generated.

      but why would i find it interesting to watch?

      same thing with watching neo fight a few hundred clones, and then superman out of there...sure the CG was mildly neat, but why do i want to watch that?

      with CG, you have to have discipline...just because IT CAN BE DONE,...does it make sense?

  97. Why 6 iterations? by the+end+of+britain · · Score: 1

    This has been bugging me since Wed. nite. First idea: use symmetric groups. Remember that 'neo' is a permutation of 'one'? Maybe they're referring to S_3, the group of permutations for {o, n, e}. Then for the identity permutation, obviously, we get f_0(ONE)=ONE (the identity element--kinda neat) and then for the other five we get: f_1(ONE)=EON, f_2(ONE)=OEN, f_3(ONE)=NOE, f_4(ONE)=ENO, f_5(ONE)=NEO, Any reason to design the Matrix using symmetric groups? Also, 6 is the first perfect number. But that's all I've got. Anybody else have any ideas?

    --
    "Oh, the tragedy of math gone wrong. I can't even talk about it." -Wil Wheaton http://www.wilwheaton.net
    1. Re:Why 6 iterations? by 3seas · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Why 6 iterations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3! = 6

      So now you'd ask why 3, I suppose, and you would be right

    3. Re:Why 6 iterations? by Apaturia · · Score: 1

      I think you're over analyzing things. Just a tad.

    4. Re:Why 6 iterations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well.. that seals it.. virgin for life

    5. Re:Why 6 iterations? by burnowt · · Score: 1

      It didn't bother me until you brought it up, but right away I thought that it might be another thing inspired by mythology and religion, namely the bible. If this is the sixth iteration, the next would be the seventh iteration, much like the seventh day in Genesis? You know, to evoke ideas about creation, finishing something, yada-yada-yada.

  98. conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More of the same mass psyops conditioning and de-evolution of society. Along with ultra violent video games, with obvious sociopathic overtones.

    It was outlined before, the people will replace human love and compassion and responsibility for cheap thrills, hedonism, violence as sport, "greed is good". In ancient times, gladiator games and torture. Modern times, videogame TV wars, humans as points to score, and then fictional representations to induce the ever-increasing lust of what in a sane society would be considered abhorrent.

    In a futuristic looking novel one of tyhe "ntertainments" was called "the feelies", it was "fun" to be part of mass desrtruction of other humans, you could "be there" or engage in any other heinous act, the milder aspect of a society where your reality or perception of your reality changed with the help of mass brainwashing, legal and encouraged drugging, and the belief of your senses altered by law by a master set of controllers.

    We are getting there. No right or wrong, just whatever you can get away with, whatever they want you to believe today, and tomorrow it can be different, but you will still believe it.

  99. Live people trying to escape the Matrix by TbGb · · Score: 1

    Depressing but true, Wash Post also reporting people think they are actually in the Matrix and attempting to escape by killing others. read it here

  100. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by crashnbur · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Thinking on a biological level, this is like saying every decision you have ever made and will ever make are only effects of causes. Chaos, like being The One, is part of the program, a perceived effect of the nature of causality.

    Also, if pop-culture epic stories are supposed to summarize some glaring aspect of society as it exists at that time, as they all do, then The Matrix is pointing out to future generations our focus on just asking "Why?"

    Dante's The Divine Commedy encouraged not simply faith, but blind faith -- a quest for understanding God's righteousness without understanding God's justice. The Wachowskis' The Matrix, on the other hand, encourages faith in self alone -- a quest for only provable truth and a healthy, skeptical mind to question that which can not be objectively understood.

    The societies of classic literature such as Dante's epic poem were built on solid foundations -- there is God's truth and no other; any violation earns damnation. Thus, The Matrix also highlights our growing secularism or even atheism.

    I'm going around my ass to get to this, but the point is simple: morality is as subjective as belief in God. The Wachowskis probably like "teaching" people this version of toleration, as well as their version of responsibility: "I can only show you the door; you're the one who has to walk through it."

    Anyway, sorry for rambling. I like this stuff.

  101. Yeah, maybe we should get accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! Thanks a lot... I always feel horrible never getting any points... maybe if I stop submitting AC, I might get modded up.

  102. Slashdot ate my spoiler: by mcc · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Screwed up the HTML. If you actually care (i don't know how obvious or correct this is), my "major spoiler" at the end of the post i'm replying to was supposed to be that i think in the same way the first movie was just a cinematic exploration of Plato's Cave, the second movie was a cinematic exploration of the conclusion that happens at the very end of this book.

  103. Yeah, but it asked "are you sure?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It couldn't have been a un*x system, because when Trinity typed the command to down the system, it asked "are you sure?"

    We all know that the one feature of un*x that makes it worth using is that it *never* asks you if you're sure. Fecking windows always second guessing my clicks.

    -paul

  104. That wasn't cake my friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It was human feces. That was the inside "joke".

    The sexual enjoyment of eating feces is known as coprophagia.

    Hope this helps.

  105. Meta-Matrix by E1ven · · Score: 1

    As I had said here, I don't think the world outside the Matrix exists at all.

    I'd love to get any discussion on that idea, now that it's not so late in the discussion.

    Think about it. Everything they have done is still inside a meta-matrix.

    It's brilliant. And I'm glad the W-brother's thought about it. People said this move didn't present any interesting dieas. I feel this is one.

    Colin

    --
    Colin Davis
    1. Re:Meta-Matrix by Esper2004 · · Score: 1

      It's Been done. See the 13TH FLOOR. Not much to the Matrix is fresh.

  106. RevolutionS, not revolution by theefer · · Score: 1

    Unlike Taco's statement in the headline, the title of the next episode is not "The Matrix Revolution" *but* "The Matrix Revolutions" (see the plural form of "revolution"). I think this detail is much more than a stupid nitpick, it might even turn out to be the main plot element of the trilogy. But let's wait, pray and see.

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:RevolutionS, not revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's mostly a play on "revelations" (itself to be taken literally, and as an apocalyptic reference).

  107. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by caryw · · Score: 1

    That was my first thought too. Imagine if there are actually something like 5 or 6 "layered" Matricies. So Zion and that whole world is just some prog running on a greater Matrix which is running on a greater Matrix.

    I'm excited for Revolutions. :)

    - Cary

  108. Box Office: It's all about the money! by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    This is my attempt at an on-topic conversation. My source: Box Office Mojo.

    As of this afternoon, estimates are that Reloaded has taken in about $73.7 million ($42.5 through Thursday, $31.2 on Friday). On a typical opening weekend, a movie will gross just less than three times what it made on Friday for the three-day weekend, suggesting that Reloaded will probably take in about $90 million for Friday-Sunday, or it could barely squeak by Harry Potter for second place behind Spider-Man's $114 million. Of course, there is no formula, and The Matrix could easily see a huge flux of ticket sales on Saturday and Sunday, and it could shoot into the $100-110 million range for the weekend.

    To put all that into perspective, keep in mind that teens under 17 can't get in to see the movie without an accompanying adult -- in any case, there is no doubt that Reloaded has already stormed past Hannibal's $58.0 million record for R-rated films. Some also suggest that, despite X2's decline in ticket sales this week, there will also probably be several tickets purchased for X-Men 2 and other films by crafty kids willing to risk sneaking into The Matrix Reloaded -- but those numbers are negligible.

    Finally, a few things are certain. One, that Reloaded will join Spider-Man as the only other film to gross $100 million before the end of its third day in release. Two, that Reloaded holds the record for the largest Thursday gross ever. Three, that Reloaded will be the highest-grossing R-rated film of all time, perhaps even by this time next week! (It has to be Saving Privat Ryan's $216.3 million.

    1. Re:Box Office: It's all about the money! by p00ya · · Score: 1
      To put all that into perspective, keep in mind that teens under 17 can't get in to see the movie without an accompanying adult
      Hmm, well here in .au that certainly isnt the case. I went to see it with a big group on Friday. I'm not sure what the actual rating was, but if it was M, then there would be no restriction for anyone over 15, and only small restrictions for those under (and I doubt too many cinemas would reject a ticket sale for unaccompanied kiddies who looked even vaguely teen). If it was MA (the next rating up), then anyone over 15 would still be ok'd. I couldn't see anything (apart from the gratuitous sex scene) that would have pulled a high rating, so my bet is that it would only have been M.
    2. Re:Box Office: It's all about the money! by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      I apologize for my US-centrism. Of course, in the story I submitted, the $42.5 million that Reloaded took in through Thursday was only domestic (in America only), so the money part of the story was US-centric to begin with.

      Either way, you make a good point. Parents in America are such prudes. I'll be glad when they start trying to teach their kids how the world works so we can be useful again instead of holding them back from the world as long as possible.

      On that note, I think American adults have a naturally developed, collective inferiority complex -- they believe that the next generation is always more capable than the last, therefore they must keep the young'ins shielded as long as possible in order to preserve what power over the world they do have. This explains so much...

  109. Just Tron with better graphics by Moe+Taxes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Programs personified, it's been done, But never as well.

    This movie achived everything it set out to accomplish and a few hundred million dollars more.

    --
    It took a real world war to end the airplane's patent wars. - Fâché Rouge -
  110. the password (spoilers) by dols · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if you convert the password of Z1ON0101 to decimal, you get Zion5..which could refer to the 5th version of Zion or the prior version, Zion 5.0, as implied by the Architect.
    Neo 5.0 took the other door and reset the Matrix and created Zion 6.0 populated by people Neo 5.0's choosing (which might include Trinity). So, the initial inhabitants of Zion 6.0, taught by Neo 5.0, frees the minds of the people who question the reality of Matrix 6.0 thereby saving the programs (people/minds) from deletion by the agents.
    The actions of Neo 5.0 can be attributed to Neo 5.0's want to save Zion 5.0's inhabitants from deletion. The saving of Zion 5.0 is deemed as a noble cause by the inhabitants of Zion for the reason of the survival of self.
    Since Zion 6.0 faced imminent destruction and the password of Zion5 allows Neo 6.0 to meet the architect and possibly "save" Zion 6.0 and since the prior versions of the Matrix probably have the same event timelines (Oracle->Keymaster->Architect), a programming loop, if you will, it would seem to me that the actions of Zion 6.0 rebels would also be similar to prior versions of Zion rebels (this goes along with the thought that Zion is a Matrix and the inhabitants, Morpheus, Trinity, et al, are programs), that the password is a hint that it's all a loop and that the Zion rebels are in fact programs. I expect that Revolutions is where Neo becomes enlightened of the fact that the "real world" is not real at all.

    1. Re:the password (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take 22779345, divide by 33, write it in hex, divide by 0x0bad you get, well it goes without saying.

      Amazing really.

    2. Re:the password (spoilers) by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Because he could stop the sentinals in the "real" world? Quite the connection... subtly obvious, but still. I read it instead as the real world being real, but him still having a control over it. Could go either way, and knowing how the series is going, whichever way it goes will redefine real.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    3. Re:the password (spoilers) by autocracy · · Score: 1

      I wanted to add one other thing to the thread as an afterthought, even though I already have another post here. Holy overanalysis on the password part batman...

      --
      SIG: HUP
    4. Re:the password (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ****spoilers****
      ****spoilers****
      ****spoilers** **

      The original post is more likely to be right. The *real* world is just another level of the Matrix.

      The other clue is that Agent Smith's clone infiltrated the *real* world, and tried to kill Neo. The clone is alive at the end because it's a program above the level of the *real* world.

    5. Re:the password (spoilers) by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Notice also that the number on the door that was opened was 101. I was wondering about the significance of that. Anytime a number shows up it seems to be significant in some way.

    6. Re:the password (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he stop the sentinals?

      We see an electrical EMP type flash and then neo calapses followed by a Hovercraft.

      Did the hovercraft stop the sentinals?

      If so, did neo calapse because of his connection to agent smith?

      Zion said the sentinals were delayed by about an hour.

      Is this a fake reality/zion to hold neo in check until he makes the 'right' choice for the architect?

    7. Re:the password (spoilers) by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      The Architect said that Neo's brain had been modified. This might allow him control over machines in the real world, if that is where they are. This movie seemed to focus much more on the question of determinism as opposed to the first movie focusing on the allegory of the cave.

      The idea of a brain being changed could explain Agent Smith's control over Bain. He could have reprogrammed Bain's mind in some way (the mind makes it real) causing him to behave differently in the real world. This would again go back to the question of how different are the humans and the machines/programs.

      I think there is plenty of evidence for either answer. I do think the focus of the second movie was the question of choice though rather than the question of reality.

    8. Re:the password (spoilers) by ralphus · · Score: 3, Informative
      Every time there is a room 101, I'm reminded of Orwell:
      When, after weeks of grinding physical torture, during which Winston confessed even to things he would never think of doing, he began to realize that O'Brien wanted something from him he could not acknowledge, even to himself, and so his conversion was impossible. Until O'Brien took the final step.

      Room 101.

      "You asked me once," said O'Brien, "what was in Room 101. I told you that you know the answer already. Everybody knows. The thing in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. It varies from individual to individual.

      "In your case," O'Brien said, "the worst thing in the world happens to be rats."

      Winston was locked into chair at a table. At the edge of the table was a cage. In the cage was huge gray monster of a rat. Winston went berserk.

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    9. Re:the password (spoilers) by HobbitGod42 · · Score: 1

      After reading your post and you mentioning Orwell I thought of something... Room 101 is (as O'Brien puts it) "The place where there is no darkness" it could have possibly been a nod to Orwell having the room be brightly lit and the architect dressed in white... Its either that or I am looking too deep into it.

    10. Re:the password (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that if you look at all the monitors behind Neo (which I assume are still showing the previous The Ones' actions), they all go the same direction, the door to Trinity.

      Coupled with the fact that the Architect says he can already tell what Neo is going to decide (the irrational choice), it still looks as if Neo is doing exactly what the computers want/expect.

    11. Re:the password (spoilers) by ralphus · · Score: 1
      Very interesting. I didn't even think of that.

      I can't wait to see the darn Matrix again!

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    12. Re:the password (spoilers) by shenki · · Score: 1

      neo's room in the first movie, where he lived before being freed from the matrix, was also room 101.

      something else to think about, is the fact that he was killed in room 303 significant?

      --
      It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one!
    13. Re:the password (spoilers) by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Actually I took the monitors more to be the possibilities of Neo's action as the matrix sees them. If you will notice, the camera always seems to focus on one and then go through it, as neo's mind chooses that path out of the many possibilities.

    14. Re:the password (spoilers) by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      The big car chase scene also happened on Highway 101, which goes up and down California, but the footage seemed to be from the San Francisco and peninsula area. I recognized some of the exits (Whipple Avenue, Marsh Rd), but they added some HUGE walls on either side of the freeway.

      Anyway, I have no idea what the significance of 101 is, but there you go.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    15. Re:the password (spoilers) by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Architect also said that the previous 5 Ones only had a "general" connection to the matrix and humanity, but that this One was different because he had a specific Love (Trinity).

      You know what they say: A One that isn't cold is scarcely a One at all.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    16. Re:the password (spoilers) by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Neo 5.0 took the other door and reset the Matrix and created Zion 6.0 populated by people Neo 5.0's choosing (which might include Trinity).

      Very romantic, but Neo 5.0 couldn't have chosen Trinity, because a) Trinity was "saved" by Morpheus (mentioned in the first movie) and b) Zion 6.0 has been around for about 100 years.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    17. Re:the password (spoilers) by _newwave_ · · Score: 1

      This thought that "the real world is not real and only a creation of the machines" is silly in my mind.

      Obviously, Neo will have to take control of the Matrix, thereby giving him greater control of the machines in the real world. The machines can't destroy the humans as they need them, giving irony to their eventual downfall. Humans are plugged into the Matrix and it can't be destroyed if humans have any hope of defeating the machines.

      In revolutions, I expect to see , as supported by the trailer, great/awesome/fantastic battles in the real world where man uses machines. It reminds me of moments in Robotech...and I hope to see Morpheous using a machine to throw down the machines that will be trying to continue to dominate the real world.

      The humans will rise within "the middle of the earth to the blackened skys above." That is all the action I need to see.

    18. Re:the password (spoilers) by dols · · Score: 1
      Actually I took the monitors more to be the possibilities of Neo's action as the matrix sees them. If you will notice, the camera always seems to focus on one and then go through it, as neo's mind chooses that path out of the many possibilities.


      And this is how modern design of AI works.. a dumbed down example is chess AI evaluates all the moves and applies heuristics to determine the best move. This monitors on the wall could mean that the Matrix is evaluating what Neo's next choice would be OR the Matrix knows what Neo's choices should be.
      Now the Oracle knows what choices will be made supposedly and understanding why those choices are made, that is, why the heuristics evaluated that choice thereby possibly improving the intelligence of Neo is the challenge that she presents Neo.
      So is Neo AI or not AI? Is the Matrix one big AI training program? What would that say about our world and evolution?

      I'd recommend seeing Waking Life in which life is examined from a more humanistic perspective.
    19. Re:the password (spoilers) by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      It was actually a 2.5 mile freeway that was built for the movie. Yeah, it looks like 101 on the peninsula, and it is called 101, but it was actually in the east bay, near Alameda.

    20. Re:the password (spoilers) by HobbitGod42 · · Score: 1

      I just thought of another possible nod(although this one is a bit of a stretch...)

      In 1984 the 'Place with no Darkness' is meant to be a new beginning. Winston thinks that it is the fall of the party... Is the 'Place with no darkness' is meant to be room 101(both in 1984 and Matrix Reloaded) then it is obviously meant to be a new begining. But since we(or atleast people who have seen it) know that isn't true(it, like in 1984, was the end but also a new begining just not the begining that winston thought it would be)(Following me here?).

      Anyways... That is probably just me looking a bit too deep into it and making inferences that don't exsist.

      Behold the Power of Suggestion.

    21. Re:the password (spoilers) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but...I already saw the thirteenth floor. :(

  111. Re:sickening. by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1
    Care to provide a specific example of an individual Slashdotter that loaths the MPAA but loves The Matrix? Or are you just going to provide exaggerated stereotyping generalizations?

    Slashdot is not one person. Slashdot is a community of people. With different opinions. Some who watched The Matrix. Some who didn't. Some who are vocal about the MPAA and RIAA. Calling a group of unique people hypocritical is futile.

    Again, I'd like some specific examples. Please don't reply without providing specific examples. That's all I want. Thank you.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  112. Re:TRINITY DIES!!! OMFG! :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same why when you gag and my giant cock and have to be ressurected by the doctor.

  113. $42.5 million by Evro · · Score: 1

    I love these ridiculously inflated figures. While that number may itself be accurate, for one thing this film opened on Thursday. This seems to be the new trend for Hollywood's big blockbusters - they open on Thursday or Wednesday so they can tack on an extra day's sales to their opening weekend figures and it makes their stock price go up.

    Secondly, ticket prices are insane. I was really psyched to go see this movie until 30 minutes ago when I went to go buy tickets. For the closest theater to me that is actually of acceptable quality, I went to go order tickets online from AOL's Moviefone.com, and a ticket was $9.25 + $1.00 service charge for AOL. So just for me and my girlfriend it would be $20.50 with no soda or candy or anything (which she wouldn't let me get away with anyway). I'm sorry, but I don't think there has been a movie ever made that is worth paying $20.50 to see, or even $9.25 for that matter. I'm sure I can't be the only one who thinks so either, so this will likely lead to a decline in actual number of tickets sold, which the MPAA will then blame on Kazaa.

    There's a theater in a kind of ghetto area near me that's really nice, and tickets there are $5.75 before 6pm, so maybe I can talk her into going there. If not I'll just wait for it to come out on DVD. Unless they price the DVD at something ridiculous like $29.99 of course.

    --
    rooooar
  114. ipv4 by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that they still use ipv4 in the future? I thought the "hacking" scene was wonderful, btw!

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    1. Re:ipv4 by feldy · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Trinity was ssh'ing to 10.2.2.2 in the matrix -- a simulation of present day society. She wasn't using an ipv4 address outside of the matrix in the "real world" which is allegedly hundreds of years in future.

      I do agree with your second point, though... It was a great scene.

    2. Re:ipv4 by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      And that SSHv1 CRC32 exploit is real...

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    3. Re:ipv4 by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      d'oh, you are correct. Still a great scene though!

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  115. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revolution is going to be a complete mind fuck about philosophy and love. In the end, Neo and The Architect are the only real "people".

  116. Heh by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    ...is that the evil computers are running Unix?! :)

    Don't you remember the Jurassic Park computers?

    "It's a yooooonix system... I know this..."

    1. Re:Heh by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah I do - another realistic computer scene from Hollywood... not *G*

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    2. Re:Heh by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh, yeah I do - another realistic computer scene from Hollywood
      uh... when was the last time a hot chick with super powers dropped a motorcycle on your server room?

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    3. Re:Heh by thynk · · Score: 4, Funny

      uh... when was the last time a hot chick with super powers dropped a motorcycle on your server room?

      Oh, about a month ago. I was going to ask for her url, but didn't have the guts since I'm a geek.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    4. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Someone mod this UP!!!! That's the funniest thing I've seen on Slashdot in years!!!

    5. Re:Heh by Snaller · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you quoted properly?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  117. Are you sure? by IcEMaN252 · · Score: 1

    Are you sure its not a continuation of the choice vs. destiny motiff. My interpretation of the film was that the architect was full of it, and Neo actually will save Zion in Revolutions.

    --
    CitrusTV (http://www.citrustv.net): the Nation's Oldest & Largest Entirely Student-Run Television Station
  118. what i'd like to see... by lpret · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'd love to see the next one come to a point where Neo is forced to be assimilated back in the matrix again. And the final scene is the same as the first scene in the first one. And he is back in it all over again. A very buddhist (reincarnation) belief to finish it all off.
    Hello Neo
    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  119. A very intelligent discussion at hometheaterforum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a very intelligent and lengthy discussion of this movie is going on here at hometheaterforum.com. I liked the movie a lot (with some very minor reservations), but the more I participate in discussions, the more I realize just how brilliant it is. This is one very deep and intelligent film.

  120. Re:anyone else think... *SPOILER* by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

    ***SPOILER****

    Taking into consideration, it makes the death of all of those people at the end more real.


    The fleet was massacred, but they weren't exactly defending the front gates. Zion is still there, at least for the time being.

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  121. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That "overly long" part about cause and effect WAS the part where our heads are messed with. You obviously didn't understand it. I've taken several philosophy classes, and I can tell you that entire scene about causality is extremely deep and well though out. Its actually a foreshadow to the rest of the movie - i.e., the notion that human minds do not make choices in the traditional sense, that they are simply a group of neurons that fire according to the laws of physics, and are caused to do so by some stimuli (a cause), and the neurons produce an output (an effect); thus, there really is no decision or "free will", only complex programming in our minds. There are no "different paths" to choose from, as the "decision" you make is simply a chemical process that occurs in your brain, and you would have inevitably made the same decision over and over provided the initial conditions were reset, because the laws of physics never change and the neurons would never have fired differently (exactly like a machine!). This part foreshadows the end where he makes his "decision" although it has already been made. It all comes down to causality. When it comes out on DVD, go over that part a few times and you will realize the entire point of the movie and perhaps the entire point of life is hidden in that discussion.

  122. Nobody gets it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone got it they would not be ragging on it. Reloaded is a MASTERPIECE that will not be appreciated till the third. There is a HUGE revelation that I am 99.9% sure will be made in the next movie that will completely change the way you view the second. There is not one matrix, but two. The matrix modeled after "our history" is actually what they think is the real world, and the matrix being "rejected" by human conciousness is the matrix within the matrix. The One is a program written by the machines and inserted into the "real world" matrix. I could go on and on with what I think is the case, but I don't feel like typing it. If you have any questions, IM me. LyingFromU82 on AIM. I truly hope someone reads this and sees what I saw.

    1. Re:Nobody gets it. by east+coast · · Score: 1

      "If anyone got it they would not be ragging on it. Reloaded is a MASTERPIECE that will not be appreciated till the third."

      Granted it is presented as a trilogy and people should not be too hard on the trilogy as a whole because of one bad film. That still doesn't mean people don't have the right to their own opinions. How many people are going to feel ripped off if your predictions are correct and only proves that Reloaded is nothing but filler?

      And if you are correct in your assumption maybe they can just continue to make film after film of matrix after matrix. Wow. That will be great {rolling eyes}. At that point it will become as pretentious as questioning what was "real" in Total Recall.

      Still a big thumbs down for me, ray ray. There simply is no way, imho, to justify car chases that last longer than the dialog. Maybe it was interesting to me when I was 10 and had seen Road Warrior for the first time but even the Mad Max crew had enough sense to try to bring a plot into Beyond Thunderdome. It's kind of ironic that I heard actual moans from the crowd when the trailers for "2 fast 2 furious" came on but these are the same people who are probably praising the same thing from the matrix... I guess a litte techno-babble (ok, very little techno-babble) and really bad techno/tribal music makes everything OK for some people.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  123. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  124. Similarities to Dune? by Rai · · Score: 1

    I'm a big Dune fan and it seems (maybe just coincidence) that there are a few similar elements in Matrix Reloaded (besides the whole war against machines, ala The Butlerian Jihad.)

    Did anyone else thing the Architect spoke just like a Mentat?

  125. How to get in for free. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    This is not the sort of thing to do in front of the average girlfriend, (if you like average). But. . .

    When I go to see films, I take my audio-engineer friend who invariably finds some fault with the sound system in whatever movie he watches. --He's the kind of guy who used to phone that number which comes up on the screen in THX cinemas to report bad audio settings.

    In any case, he will often say to me, "Sorry. I have to do this." --To which I often reply, "Go right ahead. I know you enjoy it."

    He hunts down the manager and lectures him/her about their crappily managed sound system and how he was driven insane during the performance by a speaker to his upper left which was cutting off the high end, (or whatever). The manager is usually just some poor worker clocking time, and just wants my friend to go away and stop talking scary, so he or she will offer free passes at us. (I always stick close and shake my head in displeasure as though I know what the hell my friend is talking about. "Oh yeah. The high end sucks when it's cut off. Shameful." Or most recently, at the X-Men film when he waved his hand at the passes and said, "I don't want free passes, I just want you to fix your sound system!" I reached across and took them, "I'll take those. He may not care, but my viewing experience was ruined by your speakers because he was complaining in my right ear the whole way through."

    And voila. Free passes.

    Failing an actual technical difficulty, you can nearly always find something to complain about. -Mind you, I never do. I've been too well programmed by society. I'm an agreeable little Ohm most of the time, but my friend has no problem doing so. He never raises his voice or actually gets angry. He just complains and points out flaws and, bingo. Free passes.

    I think on average, I've paid about $2 per movie outing over the last five years. Though some of that was through a stack of stolen passes lifted by a different friend of mine who worked a cruddy movie house job for a year or so.

    If you try just a little bit, you can get a virtually cashless ride through many aspects of life, I've found. And when it comes to bone-headed pop culture, I feel no guilt whatsoever in doing so. The last films I actually paid for (and did so with pride) were the second Lord of the Rings film and, Bowling for Collumbine.

    I can't wait to see Fahrenheit 9-11!



    -Fantastic Lad

  126. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Except that the presentation of the philosophy was noticeably worse, in this case.

    In the original, Morpheus says, "No one can be told what the Matrix is... you have to see it for yourself", then follows it up by actually showing Neo and the audience "just how deep the rabbit hole goes". The Watchoskis(sp?) used the medium of film to great effect by not having Morpheus rant on and on about the Matrix, but instead showing us. Was there a single scene in Reloaded that matched the visceral shock of Neo waking up in a mechanical womb, surrounded by others who were still asleep and plugged in to a hideous machine?

    Spoilers Below

    Instead, we get an annoying French guy and some old people lecturing to Neo about abstract concepts of choice, without a real payoff from it. I know that the scene with the archtect where Neo chooses the 'wrong' door is supposed to be really important, but they made it feel like just a cliched 'hero goes to save the girl' scene. In the original, the philosophy had a very real consequence; Neo gained his powers and ability from being aware that the world around him was an illusion, and that he could bend it to his will. In Reloaded, Neo makes an important descision - but I get the feeling that he would have made the same descision whether or not he had been told all the things he was. All the philosophy talk previously in the movie was just window dressing.

    I suppose that 'free will vs. fate' is a bit harder to do than 'reality is an illusion', but the first movie actually did a better job of showing the free will philosophy. Hopefully, the third movie will actually have the payoff from the choices made in Reloaded, but this movie seems to have been just an excercise in CGI and movie intellectualism.

  127. I'm not a philosophy expert or anything by extrasolar · · Score: 1

    But I would say that in the first movie we meet Plato and in the second movie we meet Aristotle---and its all obsolete :)

    1. Re:I'm not a philosophy expert or anything by geek · · Score: 1

      The truth is never obsolete. Perhaps in the third movie we'll meet Ayn Rand.

      In the first movie I would argue we met the Buddha. I haven't seen the second however.

    2. Re:I'm not a philosophy expert or anything by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      hahah

  128. Heh... by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    I'm first in line

    Said the Horse at the Glue Factory.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  129. boring boring boring... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    I know I'm probably going to be sent away in a cattle car for questioning the greatness of The Matrix on slashdot but...

    This movie was done on a very lazy level of more and more eye candy. What can't be done with CG today? Why should I be impressed with what I already know can be done? I'll be impressed when Hollywood gets back to making films with plots and good actors. The whole black leather/sunglasses/jaded looks thing is way too pouser for me.

    I also find it amusing that an earlier poster said that people who didn't understand theology wouldn't get the film. For the whole 20 minutes of dialog that went on the attempt at 'deep thinking' was painfully obvious and trite.

    Fredrick Pohl once said that there is no such thing as science fiction TV or movies. The more I see of attempts of this the more I agree with him. The Matrix had potential but was lost to make 15 year olds happy. Too bad.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  130. oh Cmdr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw it yesterday and have a variety of opinions on it, but the short review is that it isn't the original, but it's pretty damn cool, and I'm first in line for Revolution.

    Of course you will be, along with all the other good little consumers around you.
    bahaha

  131. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You're only confirming my point. If they have upgrades, then they must be even more dangerous...

    It didn't feel that way at all.

    -pVoid

  132. Enter the matrix by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    in enter the matrix, the oracle isnt played by gloria foster... i supposed she passed away by the time the game was filmed. also, the bodyguard (seraph) wasnt played by collin chou.

  133. mod parent up, and me please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    also, about all the subplots, like the french guy obsessed with pleasure, persephone with the feeling of love, morpheus with belief, and the zionians with their orgy, theyre all samplings of different hedonistic pursuits which contrast with the more calculated abstraction of the architect

    just my take

  134. Hey It's Lain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well the whole matrix thing is kinda turning out like lain. anyway it was a good movie!!! :)

  135. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give them some credit!

    They did do two things continude where they left off.

    Gave the charectors some sense of well charector.

    We saw zion, they showed the limits of their recourses.

    If that's not enough carrie-ann moss

  136. My analysis by Ogerman · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK..

    Everything from the first movie is a lie.

    Neo is a program, not human.

    Nobody ever left the matrix.

    We no longer know what the matrix really is.

    There's this 'architech' guy who really runs the whole show.

    For all we know, the matrix is really just a video game. At the end of Revolutions we might see some kid pop a disk out of his computer and say "I'm bored of this game." That'd be funny.
    OK, now imagine yourself some silly CG fight scenes. Oooohh.. Ahhhh.. OK, now save your $8.50 and donate it to the EFF instead of the MPAA. Isn't our *real world* technological freedom more important than some silly hollywood movie? Don't be hypocrites, folks. Don't support these guys.

    And no, I didn't personally go see Reloaded.

    1. Re:My analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For all we know, the matrix is really just a video game. At the end of Revolutions we might see some kid pop a disk out of his computer and say "I'm bored of this game." That'd be funny."

      If they do that, I will personally go to their houses and punch them in the left side of their spleens.

  137. Oh no... by WhosWatchinMe · · Score: 1

    The movie has set my Psychotherapy back 20 years... I am paranoid schizophrenic... Was definately great! It is no shock that it is doing so well. Many of my friends (are they really???) have returned to see it 2x already.

  138. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about the spoon?

    The person who had the spoon delivered to Neo somehow knew that Neo was about to be killed.

    Unless the person who did that is truly psychic.. (or it meant nothing and was just a coincidence)

  139. Because . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "Why is this a negative thing?"

    Because we are starting to exclusively explore our philosophies through violence ("Freedom" was the most frequent argument used in the Iraq war . . .)?

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Because . . . by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Because we are starting to exclusively explore our philosophies through violence

      Starting?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  140. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    i agree with you. i miss the dark goth thing too. it's that same exact feeling that i missed from watching the trailer of the first matrix... with enigma's 'eyes of truth' song playing in the background....

    from the revolutions trailer, i sort got that feeling back... in scenes where neo and agent smiths are in the middle of this long rainy road... and the part with trinity doing what looks like the same lobby fight sequence from the first movie... and you get to see some s&m guy with a mask on getting his ass kicked by trinity... that dark dark look is just so awesome

  141. An I'll be 2nd in line, thanks by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I liked it better the second time.. I knew which points to ignore, so I could just focus on the action, not on the Orgasm Cake.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  142. Tell me something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw Reloaded friday and plan on seeing it at least twice more in the theater, then probably buying any DVDs associated with it when they come out. I'm sure I will see Revolutions at least 2 or 3 times.

    It is wrong for me to download the Matrix:Reloaded over P2P even though I'm planning on spending well over $100 in support of it?

    1. Re:Tell me something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it may be wrong of you to spend over $100 in support of it. You've already given them $10 and will again when the next movie is released; now download it and rewatch those scenes you're interested in, and put the rest of the money to better use (or an RRSP, or give it to charity, but Keanu & co don't need any more).

  143. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually, mod this up. It's quite topical. The sequel was dog food.

  144. Disapointed by Grieveq · · Score: 1

    I've watched the original a dozen times, the Animatrix another half dozen, and I watched the trailer for Reloaded almost everyday for the past month. The Matrix is what Star Wars was to a previous generation. But I don't think I've ever been so disapointed by a movie sequel. Not even Lucas' butchering of the Star Wars universe with Episodes I and II could compare to what the Wachowski brothers did to their world.

    As hot as Carrie-Anne Moss is, did we need a sex scene that lasted 3 minutes and ended with a shot of Keanu's ass? Somethings are better left to the imagination. Even before that, the whole relationship seemed forced on the viewer, not something natural that developed in the first. And the cake scene, wtf was that?

    The whole movie's plot points just seemed forced, as if they were strung loosely together only to get to the next Bullet-Time moment. The original had that gritty feel; made you feel as if the characters were in peril the entire time. Trinity dying? Ha! Lets just reverse the ending of the first movie and play it into this one!

    And the ending...how do you end on that? Give us a satisfying conclusion if you are going to have a cliffhanger. (Similar to The Empire Strikes Back)

    I'll see Revolutions, but only for completions sake.

    1. Re:Disapointed by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      No wonder you were so disappointed, you watched the trailer almost everyday? That's a 100% guarantee that you yourself have overhyped the movie to your own mind. Really. Keep away from the third one until you're ready for it. Don't delve into upcoming previews and exclusives, and you'll really really love it when it DOES come out. Trust me.

  145. Rip Offs by dmh20002 · · Score: 1

    Neo Flying - superman (ok they admitted this one)
    Architect and 'the Source' - Tron Master Control Program
    The Key Maker - Ghost Busters Keymaster
    And worst of all - the Zion celebration scene : the Ewok party at the end of Star Wars VI

  146. Don't knock the Cake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Although not an intellectually stunning scene, or packed full of action etc, the scene fit in great. It was simply laying down the foundation for the program control, and specifically, how everything has a cause and effect =) Besides, it gives us programmers something to strive for. I doubt there are any software packages out there that can do that!

  147. Hmm... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    In the close-up shot, the very first line: "Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanneds "

    Another glitch in the Matrix?

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  148. The year must me close to 1999 by giampy · · Score: 1

    quote from the article:

    But then, the film does take place in the future. Is Zalewski surprised to see unpatched SSH servers running in the year AD 2199? "It's not that uncommon for people to run the old distribution," he says.

    comment:
    the film does take place in 2199 but inside the matrix the year must be close to 1999 so i guess it's quite ok to see the unpatched SSH around ...

    choice, the problem is choice !!!

    --
    We learn from history that we learn nothing from history - Tom Veneziano
  149. LibertineR: YOU ARE SELF ABSORBED by thinkweb00 · · Score: 1

    LibertineR, you are the most self absorbed person I have EVER met. Why bother telling total strangers that you went to "the best" school? It is because you feel so poorly about yourself that telling others how great you are fills your insecurities. Judging by your inappropriate language, I sincerely doubt that you have been through higher education. You would do the entire slashdot community a huge favor if you simply cancled your account. Please do not bother replying to my post, because I truely do not care what you have to say.

  150. I'm so bitter by goatbar · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I didn't go to the matrix to see Reeve's ass... I am so unimpressed with this movie. They have a monster budget and what kind of sound track do they have? Cheesy techno and a lame rave scene.

    So yes, she logs in as root using ssh and they have "back doors"... whoopy. Where is the artistry and the suspense. Where was the class of the subway scene. This one is just gratuitous fight scenes. And the superman bit made me want to cry. It gets even worse with the cake scene. Was this movie aimed at 12 year old boys?

    There was no depth to Morphius or Neo... sigh

    -k

    1. Re:I'm so bitter by east+coast · · Score: 1

      "Was this movie aimed at 12 year old boys?"

      What? You must not get it. You must not be l33t! You must like micro$oft products to say something like that about what should be the basis for the future of all of mankind...

      I'm going to find your social security number and hack the Gibson and ruin your life! Jo0 R 0wNeD!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:I'm so bitter by Shanoyu · · Score: 1

      If you expected something other than an action movie then you're probably a moron. Nothing personal.

  151. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously he is still in the Matrix. I was surprised to see Neo's amazement that he could feel machines coming. The "system architect" just explained it all to him! Zeon is part of the Matrix where 1% that didn't make the "right" choice can escape and not interfere with normal Matrix operation. Sort of a catch all error handling routine.
    Coincidently this turn of events gives same "catch all error handling" to Wachowski brothers. All errors and inconsistencies in *both* worlds can be blamed on Matrix imperfections. (Leaving Matrix through public phone booth? Give me a break!)

  152. Splinter in your mind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOULD YOU TAKE THE BLUE PILL ... ... or the red pill?

    By STEVE TILLEY, EDMONTON SUN

    Take the blue pill, and you see The Matrix the same way that normal, everyday folk do: as a popcorn-friendly sci-fi yarn featuring high-kickin' kung-fu, cool special effects and Keanu Reeves atoning for everything he's done since Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure.

    But take the red pill, and you must be willing to delve into the Matrix mythology the way true fans do. Diehard followers of filmmakers Larry Wachowski and Andy Wachowski embrace 1999's The Matrix and its back-to-back sequels, The Matrix Reloaded (opening Thursday) and The Matrix Revolutions (coming in November) as an adult-oriented Star Wars for the digital age. With fewer CGI aliens and more - lots more - going on beneath the surface.

    "The amount of conversation the film has inspired, digging into philosophical and religious details of the movie, has been phenomenal," said "Furiosity", a 24-year-old Toronto-area resident who is one of the moderators of MatrixCommunity.org, the first and oldest online gathering place for devoted fans of the Matrix mythos.

    "The cult following the film has spawned is absolutely phenomenal, and I think in some areas it has already surpassed Star Wars," she said.

    It's no surprise that Matrix devotees feel at home in cyberspace, our clumsy, kludgy, early-21st-century version of the all-encompassing virtual reality that the Wachowski brothers imagine in their movies.

    There, they get together via Internet message boards to do more than just talk about the best fight scenes or how hot Carrie-Anne Moss looks in skin-tight pleather. They deeply immerse themselves in the meanings, the messages and the what-ifs that the reality-warping films offer to those willing to go down the rabbit hole.

    "I went to the movie in early April 1999, and loved the symbolism," said Paul Martin, a 22-year-old from Grand Rapids, Michigan, who created the Web site MatrixFans.net four years ago. "I am Catholic, and picked up on all the Christian symbolism. Then I went to the Internet and I found that there were only seven sites dedicated to The Matrix, total."

    Those handful of Web sites have exploded to several hundred, with a fan community that rivals that of the Star Wars, Star Trek and Lord of the Rings films. For those who have taken the red pill - in the movie, Keanu Reeves's character Neo swallows a crimson capsule in order to wake up from the computer-generated hallucination of the Matrix into the real world - The Matrix is more than just a four-year-old sci-fi flick. It's a way of looking at life.

    "The majority of fans at the Matrix community have always been in consensus that The Matrix is telling us to question every detail, and for each person to seek to know themselves, and that if a person believes in themselves, they can do anything," said Furiosity, who, like the characters in the Matrix films, prefers to be known by her cyber-pseudonym rather than her real-world moniker when it comes to discussing the movies.

    "Many found the references to Christ's story quite appealing, while others completely ignore the Christian symbolism in favour of the faint Zen overlay of the movie."

    The reclusive Wachowski brothers have painstakingly mapped out an immense backstory for their trilogy, drawing inspiration from influences ranging from Greek philosophy to Chinese kung-fu flicks to the work of cyberpunk author William Gibson, who coined the term cyberspace as describing a shared virtual reality in his 1984 novel Neuromancer.

    That universe now includes The Animatrix, a set of nine animated shorts by world-renowned directors that flesh out the origins and workings of the Matrix. Final Flight of the Osiris, a CGI short by the animators who did Final Fantasy - The Spirits Within, will air on Canadian cartoon channel Teletoon later this month, and some of the other episodes are available for download from TheMatrix.com. The full DVD collect

  153. A comparison by sootman · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Matrix Reloaded: Accurate computing, Carre-Anne Moss almost nude.
    Swordfish: Laughable computing, Halle Berry topless.
    Winner and still champion: Swordfish

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:A comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother! Carrie Anne Moss could only DREAM of the breasts that Halle has been blessed with.

    2. Re:A comparison by p00ya · · Score: 1
      The Matrix Reloaded: Accurate computing
      Yes, I loved the bit where trinity is h4x0ring the power plant thing:
      ssh -l root
      haxx!
  154. Fan Recognition article YEAH! Re:Splinter in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally a fair recognition of the intelligence of the Fan following!!!!

  155. Re:Remember the movie "Hackers"? by styrotech · · Score: 1

    If you are going to make a movie about flying (ala Top Gun), you don't do it with imaginary jets.

    Funny you should mention that. The enemy migs in Top Gun seemed pretty imaginary to me.

  156. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by gwernol · · Score: 1

    ...I was also messed with later when I contemplated what is being said: "You're not here to make a choice, you've already made it, you're here to find out why you made that choice." Wow. So life isn't making choices, but discovering who we are and why we do what we do.

    This quote has an interesting parallel to Daniel Dennett's Theory of Consciousness. Dennett argues that the way we experience our lives is essentially false. He says we have a very limited form of free will - the thing that is "us" is in fact a virtual machine that runs on the brain's wetware and is not a mechanism for making choices (though I simplify greatly). The brain is a set of (very many) simplistic parallel processes that perform basic mental tasks including decision making. Consciousness is a virtual, learnt serial process that constructs an ongoing narrative to make sense of the conflicting reports and decisions that these hidden ("subconscious") processes are making.

    Thus the subconscious brain is what makes decisions and the conscious "self" rationalizes the decisions by pretending that it makes the choice itself. Essentially the subconscious has already made the choice and the mind is attempting to find out why you made that choice.

    If you believe in free will and a more traditional concept of consciousness, there are some very disturbing experiments that show people acting on decisions and only afterwards making the conscious "decision" that "causes" the action. In other words you (sometimes?) do things before you have decided to do them.

    I hope, but doubt, that the Wachowski brothers are going to use this model in Matrix Revolutions. How cool would it be if the Matrix and the "real" world of Zion were ultimately the inside of a human mind, say Neo's?

    You can find out more about Dennett in his book "Consciousness Explained". A good review gives an overview of his philosophy. Highly provocative reading.

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
  157. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kinda like our planet is part of the solar stystem, which is part of the galaxy, which is part of the universe, which is part of the multivers, which is part of the what ever contains multiple multiverses.

    its the same.. only on larger scales.. crazy..

  158. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

    That would be the entire human race. The humans in Zion were doomed anyway. The whole purpose of going through the other door was to select a few people from Zion to build a new Zion while the others died. Selecting the other door not only lets the machines destroy Zion with Neo not saving a single soul, but it also kills the "pink nuggets" as you call them because it allegedly leads to some foul up in the Equilibrum of The Matrix.

    Did anybody else think Final Fantasy X during the last 20 minutes of the film?

    --
    Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
  159. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

    You sure it was Smith? The Architect made some comment, "The process [of coming here] has altered your consciousness, but you are still fundamentally human." Implying that when he went to the Source, he brought a something of it back with him.

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  160. Back story, like the animatrix. by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    First of all, for anyone who's seen the animatrix (kid's story), did you notice that that kid, neo's lapdog, was "Mr. Popper" from Kid's Story, who killed himself and woke himself out of the matrix, because he believed in Neo (or something like that)?

    Anyway, did anyone else enjoy the animatrix (particularly the second renaissance parts 1 and 2) more than the matrix movies? I'd love to see another matrix trilogy just about the creation of the matrix, how it got started and "the rise of the machines" so to speak.

    1. Re:Back story, like the animatrix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the second renaissance story was the stupidest thing I've ever seen. Like the Matrix, the story was a moral quagmire. Let's see, humans (who are always shown as white males, how PC can you get) mistreat robot slaves, so they form a country in Iraq, and fight us only because we are so evil. It's a "why do they hate us" story, or even more lame "why do the ROBOTS hate us". Lame. Speaking of PC, why are all the evil characters white guys and almsot everyone else black. Is there some kind of racist undertone here? Personally, I think a black agent would be cool. And why do people in Zion wear their bathrobes or pajamas everywhere? And why does everyone wear sunglasses in dark rooms? Why do agents wear sunglasses when they aren't even human and don't need them? What I find unappealing about the Matrix movies is a lack of a moral center. They glorify terrorism and murdering cops. A bunch of dumb desk jockey guards get butchered in both movies. And look at the Matrix characters. They have no families or even friends. If I was freed, I would want to free my friends and family. These people only care about themselves. And their response to 250,000 robots coming to kill them is to party and shag. And why is everyone so hot looking? They only free hot looking people? Is this Logan's Run?Aside from the old farts running Zion, everyone looks like an extra from a Lenny Kravitz video. Shallow. The philosophy is second rate David Carradine dialog. And all that voguing when someone is trying to kill you is stupid. During that fight on the Semi, Morpheous, for the 99th time, did that come and get me gesture to the agent when he should have been trying to get rid of him. The whole thing is silly. Fun to watch, but hollow to the core. I'll see it a bunch of times on DVD, but I've also seen those lame Lucas films more than I care to admit.

    2. Re:Back story, like the animatrix. by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't necessarily think it was a PC "why do the robots hate us" message. After all, the robots did end up attacking and nearly destroying the human race. If you really want, you can interpret it as saying the humans were smart for not accepting the robots in the UN, if they were perhaps only delaying the inevitable. It can be interpreted as an argument for pre-emptive attack, and that the robots would've destroyed the humans whether the humans cooperated or not. You can interpret it either way, and I don't see it as PC crap.

    3. Re:Back story, like the animatrix. by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      why are all the evil characters white guys and almsot everyone else black.

      I noticed that also during Reloaded. And after watching it, it occurred to me that there is a very powerful, though (probably) unintentional racial message going on within this movie.

      Here is how the world is painted: The good, powerful and virtuous are almost always black/asian/various minority. The white man is always devious, inept, or unimportant. In our PC world, that seems quite a bit like how the media tries to paint the world. (Whether or not this is true is certainly open to debate, but as a white man myself, it sure as heck feels that way).

      Enter Neo: The ultimate in evil--the white, heterosexual man--who somehow is painted as good. And suddenly, within the context of the white man demonizing world of the Matrix, the "One", the true hero, is white. When you look at it from that perspective, it has a very interesting subconscious effect: We cheer Neo on as being the great white hope.

      Of course, this could all be a bunch of BS, but it at least tries to answer for the rather unusual loading of minority characters in positions of power in Zion.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  161. RAVE party in Zion by Junkstyle · · Score: 1

    20 million robots are coming to invade Zion. Lets throw a big RAVE and trip out on E to prepare!

  162. The Merovingian...? Married to Persephone...? by jonesvery · · Score: 1

    For those who studied something productive in school rather than enjoying the four-year binge of drugs and navel gazing that is a liberal arts degree:

    The Merovingian line of royalty is believed by some of the more conspiracy-minded to have been a direct bloodline descended from Jesus. (Another theory maintains that they were descended from extraterrestrials, but that's neither here nor there for purposes of this discussion.)

    Persephone, the daughter of gods Zeus and Demeter, was kidnapped by Hades (god of the underworld), and through a chain of events better explained elsewhere, she ended up spending part of each year on earth and part of each year in the Underworld.

    Now on to the question...

    What with Neo (the prophesized "one" who redeems the human race) discovering that he is only one redeemer in a series, and with his lady Trinity having died and been brought back to the land of the living, does anyone else suspect that the next movie will bring a revelation:

    ...that every "One" ends up presented with the same choice, and makes the same decision that Neo did; and that after making that decision they end up hanging around in the Matrix with the woman that they chose to bring back from death, slightly bitter, disillusioned, and knowing too much...

    Or have I just spent too much time hanging out with conspiracy theorists?

    --

    * * *
    It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

  163. Address for theater by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    Are you like me and disappointed that the customers that bothered to stay not only missed two of the best minutes of the movie but didn't even get a pass to see the movie again?

    If so, here's the address to complain to:

    Harkins Chandler Fashion Center 20
    3159 West Chandler Blvd.
    Chandler, AZ 85226-5063

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  164. Rescuing Neo by X-wes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Switching to Runlevel: 6

  165. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    That "overly long" part about cause and effect WAS the part where our heads are messed with.

    No it wasn't.

    You obviously didn't understand it.

    I understood it perfectly. It was just long and boring and kept going on and on. That dialogue could have been shortened to be more concise yet convey the same amount of dialogue.

    I know all about the philosophical exposition being attempted in these movies. It doesn't make them any less boring. The movie slows to a crawl during these scenes. And Neo, Morpheus, and Trinity just sit there silently as he rambles on and on about cause and effect.

    I've taken several philosophy classes, and I can tell you that entire scene about causality is extremely deep and well though out.

    I don't care if you've taken philosophy classes. And those who have taken such classes seem to be disagreeing with you, that the philosophy in these movies is cookie cutter and superficial at best.

    When it comes out on DVD, go over that part a few times and you will realize the entire point of the movie and perhaps the entire point of life is hidden in that discussion.

    You missed that the entire point of all of it was that Neo has fallen in love, which has changed things. The Architect stated the other Ones were designed with a propensity to feel compassion for fellow humans, but Neo is different in that his desires have become specific to falling in love with Trinity. Love has altered Neo's "cause-and-effect" logic and reasoning, so he risks the extinction of mankind just to save Trinity from falling.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  166. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of people "got it."

    There are several theories going around, the most common being a failsafe matrix like Zion.

    A friend of mine noticed that Agent Smith is like a replicating virus now, and when he enters Bane's "real world" mind, he is cutting his hands into bloody lines. When he is stopped from killing Neo, he shakes his hand. My friend theorized that somehow Neo got infected by that blood.

    However inplausible, there is obviously a connection between Smith and Neo in this movie. Neo sensed him in the very beginning. Smith specifically mentions a connection. I believe that connection is the source of Neo's machine sense. Obviously, Revolutions will explain things.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  167. Why they tossed it to the side by dachshund · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The original Matrix unveiled a mindbending premise over a period of about 50% of the movie. It was artfully done, so as not to overload the viewer, but to keep him guessing. Once the premise was out, then the movie could move on to a satisfying action-oriented conclusion.

    Reloaded spent 95% of the time asking and answer precisely nothing. When Neo got to the Architect, suddenly there was an enormous amount to think about-- but it was dumped on you so quickly that you didn't have time to absorb it, or really mull the implications. Then you were running again, and then it was over.

    The point is, anyone can come up with plot twists. Good moviemakers also have to keep you interested.

    1. Re:Why they tossed it to the side by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      When Neo got to the Architect, suddenly there was an enormous amount to think about-- but it was dumped on you so quickly that you didn't have time to absorb it, or really mull the implications.

      Thus requiring that you go home, think about it for awhile, go back to see the movie again, go home, talk to people about it online, go back to see the movie again, wait several months, and finally buy the DVD.

      Sounds to me like they know what they're doing.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Why they tossed it to the side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree to some extent with your review.

      The problem is, even among consumers of the matrix, smart people capable of really understanding what the architect and Neo were talking about are a sliver thin demographic niche.

      Be glad you're being tossed these occassional nuggets, you won't see many more.

    3. Re:Why they tossed it to the side by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      what about the orgasm cake. that was interesting :P

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:Why they tossed it to the side by mholt108 · · Score: 1

      Very good point - I just got back and while I was able to follow it, the Architect part had me reeling - especially the role of Zion in their plans. I think that revelations will be better, we may see multiple worlds fold away in the manner that the original matrix did. If so I just hope the brothers can introduce it as the mindblowing suprise the original was (for me at least).

      All in all though considering the ridiculous expectations I had I was very pleasently suprised, and the action realy did kick but. It was funnier than the original too.

    5. Re:Why they tossed it to the side by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      The worst part about it was, like I said in the other comment, it wasn't even the concepts that were difficult to understand, it was simply the language. The architect spoke in the most circuitous way, even to the point of being non-sensical. I'm sure lawyers were able to follow it very well.

      By the way, just as an aside, did anyone notice that matrix preshow-advertisement for green Powerade? They had a poorly done Agent Smith imitator (his voice sounded more like the moviefone guy, even though he was going for the cold calculating Agent Smith tone of voice), telling the audience that the human body can generate 12,000 BTUs of heat, and they have quotas to mee, and therefore we should all drink powerade.

      I couldn't take the overbearing irony of such blatant product placement and advertising in a movie about freeing yourself from thought control. Maybe I was the only one, but I found it so deeply ironic.

      Also, anyone else find going to the movies unbearable with all the different layers of advertising? It's so sickening, everywhere you look. From the pre-show "radio" with the fake DJs, to the TV ads that are being shown during what used to be preview time, to the stupid flashing trivia questions, brought to you by coke, or whoever, to the product placement WITHIN the movie, it really makes me physically sick.

  168. Re:Lets all shut the fuck up about The Matrix. Mmk by PharCyDE · · Score: 1

    Glad to see you're expressing your opinion on the matter.. how about you shut the fuck up and let everyone else bitch/rave as they see fit?

  169. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    from the revolutions trailer, i sort got that feeling back... in scenes where neo and agent smiths are in the middle of this long rainy road... and the part with trinity doing what looks like the same lobby fight sequence from the first movie... and you get to see some s&m guy with a mask on getting his ass kicked by trinity... that dark dark look is just so awesome

    I agree.

    I assume Reloaded was the movie in which the Wachowskis wanted to get out all their superhero ideas they had originally intended for Neo to have, as well as all the big action stuff. Once they got it out of their systems, we reached the much more satisfying second half of the movie. Especially that last 30 minutes. I really felt like I was watching the sequel I had been waiting for to the original Matrix.

    The Revolutions trailer does appear nicely dark and creepy. Big things in store.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  170. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1
    Neo makes an important descision - but I get the feeling that he would have made the same descision whether or not he had been told all the things he was.

    And that folks, was the entire point of the movie. We have no control over our actions, we can just understand the why behind them. More so in the matrix, where everything is just a program. (which begs the question why 'killall Neo' doesn't work but thats besides the point ;)
  171. Matrix Reloaded is Breakin 2:Electric Boogaloo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Way to go script wrtiers. Life the script from B2:EB and blend it with the first Matrix movie and bam. You've got Matrix Reloaded.

    Notice how they do not use the number 2 or the words Electric Boogaloo in the title of the movie. They are obviously trying to conseal the true roots of Reloaded.

    Meh

  172. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your explanation might be clearer if you didn't refer to both doors as "the other door".

  173. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by feldy · · Score: 1

    If you believe in free will and a more traditional concept of consciousness, there are some very disturbing experiments that show people acting on decisions and only afterwards making the conscious "decision" that "causes" the action. In other words you (sometimes?) do things before you have decided to do them.

    Hey, don't give us intellectual blue balls like that... what are these experiments?

  174. SPOILER: Control Systems by Sw0rdfiche · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it is just a coincidence and there is nothing to be read into the plot twist in "Matrix Reloaded" that the prophecy is just another control tool for the machines.

    Someone using what you love and believe as a means of controlling your behavior?

    Hmmm. Sounds a lot like the Replublican Party's media machine to me. We are good. They are evil.
    Our leaders are protecting us. We are the greatest civilization in history. If you don't believe this
    you are a traitor. etc, etc

    How many generations of this are YOU willing to put up with?
    The Replublican Party PR Machine
    Has You ...wake up, Neo...

  175. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that the Architect has motive to lie. There have been a hell of a lot of lies told to Neo, and Morpheus, and all of the humans in the world.

    It seems what the Architect was primarily trying to do was convince Neo that although he has a choice of doors, he never has a choice at all. "I can see the chemical receptors", etc. A pretty interesting comment, considering that the Architect has no way of detecting the real state of Neo's brain, if what Neo has been told is true. "Neo" is just an avatar of a mentality that is supposedly out of the machines' domain.

    So the Architect is trying to convince Neo that he has no choices, only the ability to understand why he makes those choices.

    Not to mention that perhaps Neo can make a choice that the Architect doesn't want him to make. Neo was offered two doors, one on the left, and one on the right. Why only two? The doors aren't even really there. Neo's weakness is in his acceptance of the limits to his choices. Perhaps he should have tried to hack the Architect, or the Mainframe, or the root command level he apparently was accessing when he was talking to the Architect.

    Instead, he chose thr Trinity door, and Zion 5.0 was fated to fall.

    Neo has to stop accepting "facts" given to him ex cathedra, and start generating some new questions. Give him time, it's only been a few months since he woke up, and he's been very busy. Come the Revolutions, he'll hack those smug machines by asking questions no one wanted to ask -- and getting some answers.

    Zion isn't what is seems. Neither are the machines, or the Matrix, or the Desert of the Real.

  176. Ironic by lurker47 · · Score: 1

    This is the most ironic scene I have seen in my life. The "message" is what you describe. Now, however, consider that Zion is a matrix within a matrix.

  177. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    " (which begs the question why 'killall Neo' doesn't work but thats besides the point ;) "

    Because it wouldn't work :)

    The machines have a weakness which only now occurs to me: they are deterministic by nature! They only can see the world in strictly cause and effect terms. Their philosophy doesn't believe in free will, because they don't have it -- don't understand it -- and will try endlessly to fit human thought to their way of thinking.

    They will always claim that Neo never really has a choice. They don't believe he does.

    But they don't try to explain why Neo has deviated from the behavior of his predecessors other than the fact that in this incarnation, he is in love with one person. (and has no problem with killing thousands of pink blobs by shockwaving the city as he moves through it at 100,000 miles an hour to save her).

    They archly dismiss his love as chemical receptors in the brain, and deny him his humanity by denying his ability to choose becaues of his love for her.

    BUT: His love for her actually broke the Neo Loop! Volition DID change cause and effect. The machines decide, by their nature, that he has simply entered another level of cause and effect.

    Whee! this is fun!

  178. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

    this is both the power and the curse of recursion. it's not just enough to "get it", you have to know how to "get out".

  179. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by gwernol · · Score: 1


    Hey, don't give us intellectual blue balls like that... what are these experiments?


    Sorry about the blue balls :-)

    Try this paper of Dennett's as a starting point. He talks about four pieces of experimental evidence that throw the traditional model of consciousness into doubt. I think the fourth one is the most interesting. Libet ran an experiment where subjects were asked to flex their hand when they saw a rotating wheel reach a particular position. Their neural activity was monitored and they were asked to say when they made the decision to move their hand. The nerve impulse to make their hand move was consistently seen to occur before the subject was aware that they had made the "decision" to move the hand.

    It seems that the subconscious makes the decision to move the hand, then the consciousness rationalizes this into a "decision" afterwards.

    This is just one example. If this is the underlying model of the way the mind makes decisions, then it has significant implications for the perceived free will we have.

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
  180. I just saw it.. by schon · · Score: 1

    When I saw that scene, I laughed out loud - and I was the only one (my wife asked what was so funny - but she didn't get it when I explained it to her..)

  181. Re:Remember the movie "Hackers"? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    >The enemy migs in Top Gun seemed pretty imaginary to me

    What did you expect, that they could "borrow" a couple of Fulcrums? Remember, Top Gun was made, what, 1986-ish? Soviet Union hadn't fallen yet, 29's were probably a little hard to come by unless you are Saddam.

    IIRC, they used airforce trainer (prolly T-38 Talon) jets to 'simulate' the migs -- probably the closest you could get back then on a budget.

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  182. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

    Well, if we believe the architec then the fact that Zion is dead and Neo is still around causes a problem in the matrix that will destabilize it causing the matrix, and all of the humans sitting around in their pods to die. Now apparently things are different, theres a virus running around (Agent Smith) and Neo decided in the machine's view to sacrifice all of humanity (except for the crews of Morpheus's and Niobe's ships) for Trinity. The architec claimed to know that he knew what Neo would do, but does he know about the other anomaly running around in his system, Agent Smith?

    I'm betting that its Smith that breaks the casualty loop and not the fact that Neo made the decision to save Trinity.

  183. Matrix Reloaded Scenes: by Enonu · · Score: 1

    Scene 1:

    An Albino: Can I get a shark with a frikk....

    Neo: *sigh*

    The albino and Neo fight.

    Scene 2:

    Chinese Guy: I see that you are here, and I am Chinese. Let us fight.

    Neo: You are asain, thus I must fight you because you have to be good.

    They fight.

    Scene 3:

    Neo fights another Neo because 2 + 2 = 4. Neo wins. Neo says "whoa."

  184. Hurmph... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
    ...but the short review is that it isn't the original, but it's pretty damn cool, and I'm first in line for Revolution.

    Despite the fact that as it turns out, Neo is actually bisexual, Morpheus is Trinity's half brother, and Agent Smith is actually Jesus in disguise?

  185. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1
    well one very simple example is the difference between the time when the starting gun goes off and (1) when the sprinter's reflex starts involuntary motion of the body; (2) when the sprinter's consciousness detects the sound of the gun and begins streaming explicit "commands" (run like hell) to the body. researchers measure (1) w/ a fast camera and (2) w/ electrodes sensitive to the sections of the brain responsible for voluntary motor control.

    anyway, very highly trained sprinters rely more and more on (1) since it is typically the "shorter neural path" (resulting in faster times, duh) and suppress the urge to rely on (2) overmuch, in contrast w/ those not so highly trained (i.e., the rest of us). some argue that this is the subconscious overriding the conscious, and other such interesting interpretations.

  186. Matrix Mind-Bend by cosmosis · · Score: 1

    I suggest you see this movie again. The Architect scene alone was the most mind-blowing thing I've seen on celluloid in at least 10 years.

    After reading the reviews I was expecting a mediocre film. Boy were they wrong! This file surpasses the original in several ways, especially in the cerbreal mind-bening part. For those who didn't get all the radical and profound implications, please don't trash the film becaus you lack sufficient intelligence to comprehend it.

    I'm giving it a 10/10.

    Planet P Blog

  187. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

    He didn't mess with the real world. He messed with the machines. That's a very different thing.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  188. Villains by MentholMoose · · Score: 1

    I liked the crew of program cronies maintained by Merovingian, but I was disappointed the werewolves (well only one since Persephone killed one) didn't have a full moon to show their true stuff (probably would've been too cheezy to have Neo battling teen wolf though).

  189. Well... duh! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    Sorry, but honestly, didn't you see this coming from a mile away? I mean, it's just such an obvious move: "the 'experiences' of Neo's 'awakening' (and afterwards) are themselves simulated by the same computer that simulated his life up to that point.

    I honestly found myself wondering why Neo, Morpheus, etc. were too dumb to think of this possibility in the first movie. Every kid in an intro philosophy class who thinks for 10 minutes about these sorts of matters inevitably stumbles on that thought: There is no difference between the red and blue pills. They just determine what program you go into next. (I should know--I've been teaching intro philosophy courses since '99. Even C- students come up with this on their own.)

    It's just shameful that this is the only real item of plot developmet in the tiresome second movie.

    1. Re:Well... duh! by tmortn · · Score: 1

      I agree. I didn't really dwell on the idea the last time because I dismissed it as too much for a movie to go into, and the simpler pallate of physical world interacting with 'simulated world' woud allow them to more fully develop the story.

      The problem of the cascading simulated realities is that it is an infinate feedback loop. IE you can't know where it ends. In a movie you have the chance to set up a finite problem and solve it which is what makes it so desireable as the real world has no such comfort. I haven't decided yet if I think the brothers made a good or bad choice to open themselves up to an unsolveable scenario with no 'The End'.

      I think there was more plot development than this. The whole concept that the machines are not a 'borg collective' kind of system ( something very weak/subtle in the last one).. that they too compete and are at odds. And of course there is always the discussion of choice. Also what does Smith have to gain in Zion ? ultimately is he after control of the matrix or does he want to escape it ? how can he escape it if he is just a program ? Granted the movie deals with these things in a very rudimentry way comparitive to a philosohy class, but its a format more approachable to most people than good old Phi 101.

      My biggest disapointment was the limiting of NEO to physcial fighting. It just didn't make sense. His combat should have been far more cerebral and trancendent after what he does to Smith at the end of The Matrix. Since he can alter the code directly instead of bending the rules of the program he has no need to 'fight' hand to hand.... course thats just not near as exciting to watch.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    2. Re:Well... duh! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I didn't really dwell on the idea the last time because I dismissed it as too much for a movie to go into,

      Bullshit, Red Dwarf did it twice during it's run, and you're only talking about 20 minute episodes. Why can't a 2-hour movie go into it?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Well... duh! by tmortn · · Score: 1

      What was Red Dwarfs audience compared to the Matrix ? The success of Matrix was its appeal on many different levels. Pure action, and some good mind twisting with some decent theology/philosophy basis. It was the blend that made it such a smash hit.... swinging to far to one side or the other would have been a mistake in terms of ticket sales. I think they did a good job of opening up new issues of the matrix for discussion and expanding the scale and epic sense of the action for this movie.... after all you have to recall the economic drive which creates this movie.

      The mixed reviews are no surprise to me... hell the damn thing would have had tell us the meaning of life in a holodeck 3d experience to fullfill the hype.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    4. Re:Well... duh! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      What was Red Dwarfs audience compared to the Matrix ?

      It should come as no surprise that an intellectual British comedy carries a smaller audience than a mass-consumption grade american action film. My point was that they had plenty of time to approach the subject since Red Dwarf could do it in 20 minutes more than once, and each of those episodes included many of the same elements that already exist in the Matrix.

      The success of Matrix was its appeal on many different levels. Pure action, and some good mind twisting with some decent theology/philosophy basis.

      The same can be said about Red Dwarf, in fact. Even though it wasn't a smash hit in the states, but it's quite a rarety for foreign-produced entertainment to smash the states the same way as domestic-produced entertainment. It's my opinion that the attempts to Americanize Red Dwarf ruined it to the point where it couldn't be successful here, but the original would do just fine.

      Now is a good time to point out that Red Dwarf's medium is totally different than the Matrix's. TV serialized shows have a lot more room to explore shit, but they can only do serious exploration within a smaller time frame. But over the life of the series, they typically have a lot more room.

      I think they did a good job of opening up new issues of the matrix for discussion and expanding the scale and epic sense of the action for this movie.... after all you have to recall the economic drive which creates this movie.

      I don't remember much about the original, I certainly don't remember actually liking it that much. I haven't seen the sequel, and it's not anywhere in my to-do list. But I'd like to point out that Red Dwarf also has an economic drive....

      The mixed reviews are no surprise to me... hell the damn thing would have had tell us the meaning of life in a holodeck 3d experience to fullfill the hype.

      These days every movie gets mixed reviews, and every movie gets more hype than it lives up to. Except the new star wars movies. I haven't noticed any hype around them. Heh. Of course, I haven't noticed any hype in general, I like to live a hype-free life.

      Anyways, if they had wanted to add that level of complexity, leaving you wondering what's real and what isn't, they could've done so without significantly altering the plot or the runtime of the movie, since it already has all the elements needed (at least, the first one did, iirc). It's not really a qeustion of what the audience will digest, with those things I mentioned in consideration. It's more a question of intent. So it's safe to conclude that they either 1) didn't intend to leave you with that feeling, or 2) they did intend, and failed to execute properly.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:Well... duh! by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      > didn't you see this coming from a mile away? I mean, it's just such an obvious move

      Obvious, huh? Did you mention this at the time of the original film?

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  190. More Matrix Numerology... by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was I the only person who noticed that the implication of the Architect's speech is that Neo is not The One... ...he's Number Six?

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:More Matrix Numerology... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Heh! Not that specifically, but I did feel all the misdirection was Prisoner-like.

  191. Architect Deception... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The architect was clearly lying. He claimed that Trinity would die and Neo saved her. It was a simple oversight on his part, but the Architect was no more than a clever deception program. Nothing more, Nothing less.

    1. Re:Architect Deception... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, she died (Neo resurrected her). This is analogous to the Oracle telling Neo that he (or Morpheus) would die in the first movie, which he did (Trinity "awakened him with a kiss" - hence her comment "I guess we're even" in the second movie).

      In fact, I can't think of an instance in either movie where any machine intelligence has actually lied. They may speak obliquely (or simply not understand a concept and thus rationalise around it, most notably free will and choice), but they don't seem to want or need to lie.

  192. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    no he didn't.

    he had said that neo saved him for a reason. that was the reason the kid was saved.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  193. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    yes it was smith. recall what smith said to neo before. he said when neo beat him something was left behind in neo, they had a connection. the same was true for smith a peice of neo was left in him.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  194. SPOILER WARNING...A couple of questions by darrad · · Score: 1

    Ok, let me begin by saying, I enjoyed the movie for what it is, entertainment. That said, there are some glaring changes that I have to ask about...

    In Matrix I, after Morpheus set Neo free, there is a scene where they are removing all the plugs, etc. Suddenly, they all have the plugs back. I have to wonder if this is hint that they are actually back in the power plant, but do not know it...

    The second question is this...

    In Matrix II, the scene were they return to Zion, the contoller for the gate is shown in 2 ways, one, on board a ship, or something like a ship, all plugged in to the Matrix, and then shown in the Matrix, operating the controls for the gate. I understood from Matrix I that they needed to be up close to the surface to enter the Matrix. This leads me to think again that they are all back in the power plant, including all of Zion....

    1. Re:SPOILER WARNING...A couple of questions by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      all plugged in to the Matrix, and then shown in the Matrix, operating the controls for the gate.

      I don't think that was the same matrix. You have these plugs all over your body, so why not allow people to control the complex security system through virtual reality.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  195. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    notice that neo never actualy beat them like he did to smith. but he is not worried about them becasue they are bound by the rules of the matrix just as neo is. and neo can bend the rules unlike the the agents who are fixed.

    as for the other humans, they did have to worry about fighting the agents. morpheus almost died and had to run away. the 2 that encountered smith when smith took over one of them were running scared.

    agents are still dangerouse to everyone except neo!!! so your problem is that neo is to powerful and not afraid of the agents? well if he was not then he would not be the one.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  196. I can't believe no one's brought this up already by MojoMorph · · Score: 1

    Agent Smith is a virus! Think about it, that's classic virus behaviour: he copies himself onto everyone he comes into contact with, jumps to a new "host/environment" (i.e. the outside world) when he gets the chance I think this generally fits in line with the essentially correct analogies that the movie makes with computing today. Of course this brings up the excellent question of how an agent was "infected" in the first place, which leads to questions of the nature of Neo and his powers which leads right back to Agent Smith's monologue, while interogating Morpheus, about how humans behave like a virus. I don't know if this is a stretch on my part or an intentional reference by the writers to the first movie. I came out of the movie somewhat dissapointed, but the more I think about it, the more I think about :-) and the more I appreciate the subtle undercurrents interwoven througout the movie. Having said that, the action to substance ratio of this movie was not as well balanced as in the first Matrix. I loved the way the love scene was interleaved with shots of the celebration, but I really would have prefered to see Carie-Ann Moss' ass in the final shot instead of Reeves'. Two scenes that were out of place: 1. The fight with the oriental guy: "You don't know someone untill you have fought them." Awww coooooooome on, give me a break! Cheeeeeeeezy! 2. "Yeah, sure I'll take you to the key maker, but only if you kiss me like you mean it." Can anyone say "writer's block?" Ugh. what a lame-ass scene.

  197. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    the doors were really just a metaphor for the decision that the oracle tells neo he had already made (but was probably a decision she had led him to make). she says he can't see past it because it was a decision he didn't understand, but we're supposed to wonder if he couldn't see past it because there was nothing past it, if it's because the matrix had been reset

    The point of the doors speech was to tell neo that the machines could live without humans, although it would be a sacrifice they wouldn't be willing to make unless the stakes were high enough. Earlier neo has a similar conversation with the councilman about the sacrifice humans would have to make to live without machines.

    I suspect that this sets the stage for a compromise to be made between humans and machines in the third movie, and I expect the oracle to become a 'good guy' again

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  198. Question about the movie by mad44 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I am puzzled by the following inconsistency in the movie:

    In Zion, everyone wears old, worn out clothes... Even the council members have old clothes.... Everything is old and archaic... Yet, when Morpheus's ship (Nebu-whatever) is entering Zion, the woman operator is wearing a white modern cloth; she is also using a very fancy user-interface like we have seen in "Minority Report"...

    My question is where did that scene come from? In that scene everything is fancy, not old and archaic as in other things in Zion.

    Is it because the woman operator was connected through her cerebellum into a simulation program (not connected to Matrix, a local simulator) to get a better user-interface? And what we see there is her self-image in that simulator???

    1. Re:Question about the movie by uberdood · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes. Did you *NOT* see them in the chairs with the gizmo in their heads?

      Now on to the really important continuity question. WHY THE FUCK did they have body ports again after having them removed in Matrix? It's like Highlander 2 all over again.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
    2. Re:Question about the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ports of any kind were removed in 'The Matrix'.

    3. Re:Question about the movie by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they didn't have a chance to rescue all the tailors and dry cleaners from the matrix yet?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:Question about the movie by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      I would conjecture that they are in the "loading program" similar to when Neo get's his guns in The Matrix.

      Also, near the beginning of the movie when Morpheus is at the gathering with other ship captains, and the package is delivered to Neo ... I believe that they are again in the Matrix, and not IRL.

      Even though it is not explicitly shown when they ARE in the Matrix and when they are NOT, I don't believe its terribly difficult to determine ... based on clothes, and "plugs" ... since the "plugs" disappear then they are in the Matrix, due to "residual self image".

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  199. "Who is Number One?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You are, Number Six."

    The correct punctuation would have helped a lot. :)

    1. Re:"Who is Number One?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Perhaps a Refernce to show "The Prisoner" where the prisoner was 6?

      Last episode of which was odd, and included "Number 1" being himself that is "Number 6, the prisoner",

      a past incarnation of neo "number 1" started programing the AI that one day would make the matrix?

  200. Product placements by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

    Also, I would like to commend the Wachowski brothers for acknowledging the existence of computers that aren't Macs.

    Well, it is set in a dystopia.

    ASA

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  201. Don't care. by 0bjectiv3 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sorry, but when the price of a movie exceeds my hourly wage, minute for minute, it's not worth seeing.

    Since I'm horribly underemployed (like most of our readers), this rules out most movies.

    The only solution is to *rent* DVDs, burn them, and watch them at their "measly" resolution.

    Were I not to pay to see the "hit" movies Hollywood and their bitches pitch at us continuously, I'd be able to afford an incredible television upon which I could watch DVDs in the comfort of my home.

    The Matrix is just a juiced-up version of Plato's "The Cave". Unless something mind-altering happens, it remains nothing more.

    --

    "Saddam Hussein cavorts with terrorists."
  202. Much better than ANOTHER "Judas" segment. spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, first movie, everyone is betrayed by ONE human.

    Okay, second movie, everyone is betrayed by ONE human.

  203. Just because... by ionpro · · Score: 1

    ... you geeks don't get any and are uncomfortable with the social rave scene doesn't mean the majority of their viewing audience is.

    1. Re:Just because... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't uncomfortable with it - in fact, I liked it. For the first few minutes. By your account, doing an hour and a half of the rave scene would have been great. It wasn't the scene in and of itself that bothered me, merely the unendingness of it all. Another point in the movie which I thought was dragged out was the fight between Morpheus and the Agent on top of the truck. I mean, seriously, how many times can he be thrown to and/or hang off of the edge of the damn truck? By about the 17th time he was on the edge of the truck, I wanted to push him off of it! :P

      In terms of me "getting any", my lady would disagree with you. :)

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  204. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, he's just had a firmware update for wireless networking.

  205. It was a better than average movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just sad to see so many people trying to claim it has some deep philosophical message or that it changed their outlook on life.

    The philosophy presented in The Matrix is VERY basic. It's one step above "eat, breed and die".

    It is "is what I see REAL".

    It's still inwardly focused. My reality, my perceptions, my knowledge, my destiny.

    The "enemy" is "The Matrix". A machine.

  206. That would be dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'd end up with the dream within a dream within a dream within a dream issue.

    Which has been done to death by most high school creative writing students.

  207. NEO v6.0 by Vidiot3k · · Score: 1

    I know I've read some posts like "I think there's a matrix in a matrix" and "What if they're all programs", but what if they're not? Remember when Morpheus was explaining the matrix in the first movie and he said everyone in the matrix believes it's 1999 but it's really closer to 2199 and we've been fighting the machines for over one-hundred years? Does that mean that (Being the Neo is The One v6.0 with all new popup blocker and spam control) that they have really been fighting for 4-500 years!!!??? Holy Crap, I need an advil... Oh yeah, the rave scene sucked ass!

    1. Re:NEO v6.0 by p00ya · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, the rave scene sucked ass
      Not to mention the gratuitous sex scene mixed in.
  208. It was all a lie in The Empire Strikes Back also. by enkidu · · Score: 1
    Remember "Luke, I AM your father."? Basically, everything Luke had been told was a lie also. But that doesn't mean that SW:TESB wasn't the best of the series. Matrix Revolustions isn't out yet, so I can't pass judgement, but methinks you are over hasty. All Matrix Reloaded did was show that the surface story of "The Matrix" was not the whole story. The complexity of the plots (and the metaphysical dilemma's go deeper than simply, "free your mind, free your body and then free the people from the matrix". I won't say anything more lest I spoil the movie.

    So what if the fight scenes were unnecessary. They were still way better than anything that's been put on the screen since the original Matrix. Don't tell me you went to see the movie just to learn the new plot twists...

    P.S. I think your title should have been "Matrix Reloads and Misfires". Dry firing is what you do when you pull the trigger on an empty chamber, which wouldn't happen if you had just reloaded.

    --

    There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
    -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
  209. The people who find Matrix to be deep philosopy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    also find Scooby Doo cartoons to be high suspense and intrigue.

  210. We've already seen that movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "The Thriteenth Floor"

  211. top movies by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you really saying that the two Matrix movies, the two LoTR movies, and Shawshank Redemption are the five best movies ever?

    Perhaps you should watch the following, any of which are better than those five:
    A Clockwork Orange
    Apocalypse Now
    The Manchurian Candidate
    Citizen Kane
    One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest

    I'd personally add a bunch more (Taxi Driver, Lawrence of Arabia, Bridge On the River Kwai, Ben-Hur, Full Metal Jacket, Dr. Strangelove, Mulholland Drive, etc.) but I think that's enough for now.

    1. Re:top movies by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      OK normally I like respecting people opinion. and it looks like you in genneral have good taste in movies , but Clockwork Orange is the single stupidest movie i have ever had the displeasure of watching. It was 2 hours of pointless vilance, and writers and directors who think they are smarter than you tring to make you think.

      the problem is they wern't thinking them selves when they made it.
      it is pure an utter bullshit.

      P.S. if you like clockwork orange you'll love Baracka....I Hated it even more than Clockwork orange but I can't say its a worse movie cause its not even a movie....its a fucking slidshow, the kind your rich uncle gives you after his trip around the world to see the pesants of the world......
      any way

      END RANT

      --
      --meh--
    2. Re:top movies by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      The problem with that is that I believe "classic" movies, no matter how good they were in their time, are grossly inferior to movies of today. A good movie, to me, looks real on screen. Just because a movie has the best story doesn't mean it is the best movie; cinematography is a huge part of a movie's quality. That said, I won't challenge you on the greatness of any movie's story.

      Still, given all of that, yes, the Matrix, LOTR, and The Shawshank Redemption round out my top five. American Beauty and Office Space are probably next on the list, though I haven't given it a lot of thought. Simply stated, I judge movies by two things: cohesiveness and entertainment value. That is, how well does the movie hold together, and how glad am I to have seen the movie after it's over (and how likely am I to want to see it again and again).

    3. Re:top movies by nathanh · · Score: 1
      but Clockwork Orange is the single stupidest movie i have ever had the displeasure of watching. It was 2 hours of pointless vilance,

      Congratulations for spotting the entire point of the movie. The point was that violence is an integral part of Alex. The attempts to "cure him" didn't achieve anything. Notice the irony (proper use of the word) present in Alex's final line "I was cured alright".

      Anthony Burgess is a brilliant author. He was making a statement about the uselessness of "rehabilitation" which is still the buzzword of modern prison reform. Some people simply can't be cured. Alex was one of those people. The movie was an excellent adaptation of the book. Easily one of the top 100 movies of all time.

  212. did you see the same movie I did? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    The movie I saw wasn't "chock full of plot and philosophy" with "a few stylish action scenes". The movie I saw spent more than 60% of its screen time on action scenes, most of which were tediously drawn out far longer than they should've been, and which in any case lacked the subtle style of the first movie. The "philosophy" was a pretty half-baked discussion of the age-old question of free will.

    1. Re:did you see the same movie I did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "philosophy" was a pretty half-baked discussion of the age-old question of free will.

      Erm, if thats all you got out of it, I recommend seeing it again. If that is still all you get out of it -- take a philosophy and logic class, then watch it again.

      Thanks!

  213. And you think Scooby Doo solves crimes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we get it.

    We just know that the philosophical message being presented is rather pedestrian.

    They do it in a cute way. But that doesn't make the message any more meaningful.

    It's escapist fluff.

    A nerd discovers he's really powerful and gets a hot girl friend while realizing that what he thinks is reality is not reality.

    The same message can be handled in a 30 minute cartoon with time left over for commercials.

    A soup bowl is "deep" to an ant.

  214. What happened to TANK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know what the hell happened to TANK? He didn't die in the first movie. Yet we are told that he's dead without any explanation as to why. I mean LINK was good, but having TANK there would have been more satisfying for me.

    1. Re:What happened to Tank? by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

      The actor that played Tank wanted LOTS more money major billing and probably a limo too. His limited part did not warrant this so the brothers axed his ass. Tank was not a major character in the first movie but the roll did add somewhat to the overall effectiveness of it. ERGO why pay someone shitloads of money for merly a minor supporting roll.

      sparkeyjames

    2. Re:What happened to TANK? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      You're thinking about "his little brother, Dozer".

      Tank died, Dozer survived. They didn't hire the guy (too bad, he seemed to be the one guy who could act) for the second film for a reason I don't know.

      To the best of my knowledge, Dozer is still alive, and is just taking some mini courses while living with his girlfriend behind the storage room where the giant, mechanical ents are kept.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  215. Similarities to by p00ya · · Score: 1
    If anyone's ever seen hack sign (great anime), they'll doubtlessly see some similarities between the architect and Hector.

    When I was watching the animatrix (ren. I i think) I couldn't help but feel the whole thing was cliched (got bubblegum crisis anyone?).

    The truth is, it would be pretty much impossible for the Wachowski bros to come up with anything completely original, and many anime/sci-fi fans will have seen the same themes elsewhere. Still, that doesn't mean Matrix Reloaded (or The Matrix FTM) isn't original, it combines elements that hvave been part of other fiction in a new way, and I can safely say I loved both.

  216. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by jedinite · · Score: 1

    Your (or your friend's) hypothesis is an interesting one...

    However, I'm not positive, but having seen the movie twice already I'm pretty sure that Agent Smith / Bane is cutting his left hand with the knife held in his right hand - and he shakes Neo's hand with the non-cut right hand.

    I understood it to be that he was interested in feeling the pain and seeing the blood, now that he was in the "real world".

    --

    ---------
    There is no try at jedinite.com
  217. Re:the password (spoilers) - Trinity changed pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the movie Trinity changed the password using the sshnuke exploit. if you look at the commandline you'll know what I mean.

    How could she know what version it is... is this is a clue of some kind, or a screw up to what was otherwise a realistic scene.

  218. Hypothesis: SPOILER by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, how about this one: The machines are actually in a prison of human creation (the "Outer-Matrix", where Zion is and the machines rule). But the machines know that they are captive and have crafted the "Inner Matrix" as a genetic-programming ecosystem to try to create a program that can hack the "Outer Matrix" to allow them to escape.

    So, in essence, the "Inner Matrix: (the 1999 world in the movie) is there to breed "The One", who caries "the code" to hack the "Outer Matrix" so that the machines can escape.

    ??? Waddya think?

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  219. WTF was Roy Jones jr doing in this movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Middlewieght champ of the world playing in the matrix. . .

    Must have been a bug in the matrix.

  220. Two lesser things I noticed [SPOILER] by wfolta · · Score: 1

    1. Yes, the orgy scene was way too long. I'd have been happier with about 20 seconds of Neo/Trinity and 30 seconds of orgy. (Or less.)

    But, did you notice that the orgy scene was very reminiscent of the club where Trinity first met Neo in the first Matrix? The same kind of panning and moves. And in the original, Neo and Trinity were so close they were practically kissing, but not quite. This time around, it's all a bit more, um, intimate.

    I can't help but think there's a parallel and a message in that.

    2. The French guy and cake. Seemed sloppy until I thought through the sequence again:

    * The French guy spiked the woman's cake to send her to the (women's) bathroom.
    * The French guy then excuses himself to go to the men's room, but in fact goes to the women's room to seduce the woman. (Or maybe the cake was spiked in a way that it caused her to want him.)
    * The French guy's wife knows what he's up to and that's why she takes Neo, et al, to the men's room, where she has Neo kiss her. A parallel of sorts.
    * We know she knows what her husband has done from her command to the vampire she doesn't shoot, and from her conversation when her husband shows up.

    Not sloppy at all!

    In between all of this, we're told that free choice is an illusion fostered by the strong who are controlling the weak. Which ties in with the Oracle saying that Neo's already made the choice, but now needs to justify/explain it. Which also ties in with the French guy's remark that they know the how but not the why. Which ties in with Smith who's pissed because Neo destroyed his why, and now he's aimless.

    Whew!

  221. have you seen by serenarae · · Score: 1

    Have any of you seen "Open your eyes"? It's the original "vanilla sky" but subtitled and WAY better. Anyone see any similarities like I do? Or maybe I just need some sleep...

    --
    see sig. see sig run. run sig run.
  222. Please Consider by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1

    If you buy the "Inner-Matrix", "Outer-Matrix" idea then you could also speculate that this animalistic behavior is a sort of "human essence" as seen from the machine's point of view, having been architected by the machines and done in the only way "they" could imagine. Strip away everything clean, deterministic, emotionless and what are you left with? "Dirty, smelly, foul (did anyone else notice the human filth that people were dancing in?), hormone-driven animalistic behavior".

    Human beings are in love with art, cleanliness and have a need light colors to be happy. That party, had it been a true human creation, would have been cleaner, sexier with lighter colors and more decorations (even if impromptu)...

    This is how the machines perceive us. It is their "dream of what we really are"... Not ours...

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  223. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by seann · · Score: 1

    I didn't see him shake his hand. :/
    "ohh he's gonna shake his hand!!.. wait..he's not..hmm.."

    --
    I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  224. Too much tonsil wiping between Neo and Trinity by scourfish · · Score: 1

    Maybe they ate too much of that tasty chocolate cake

  225. Orgie Scene?? WTF??` by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    WTF is up with the orgie scene???? It's like they said, "Hey, Morpheus just spoke, I'm horny now." I didn't see any old people in the crowd, just young verile, sweaty, horny young people.

  226. You're forgetting the outright, most obvious scene by DannyiMac · · Score: 1

    I thought the movie was all around awesome, but for one scene which truely arises the Matrix-in-a-Matrix, cop-out type ending is where the crew is evacuating the Nebuchadnezzar and they're being chased by Sentinels and Neo stops them like he stops bullets in the Matrix.

    Ever since they announced the Matrix sequels I said to myself and friends, "I'll shoot myself in the head if it turns out that they are still in the Matrix." But I followed that up with, "But that would be a stupid cop-out ending and will never happen."

    I'm really interested in finding out how they are going to explain how Neo did that. Maybe he has some type of symbiotic bond with the Matrix. ;P

    Possible Matrix-in-Matrix endings:
    13th floor ending where a simulation creates a simulation.
    They never left the matrix in the first place, the "real world" was created by the machines to give the illusion of freedom.

    I really hope the actual ending blows my mind OR the human race is SAVED, YAY!

    --
    - Danny
  227. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel exactly the same way. In general, I was happy about the movie as a whole, but the first hour could have been better. Some of the fights were a little bit too long and sometimes unnecessary. Awesome effects, but I felt that the sequence of events was flawed.

    They tried to crammed too much in one movie, so there was a loss in the essence of it. In a way, I believe that they should have ended with 4 parts, instead of 3. And this way the events could have been spaced out somewhat better.

    Also, the movie started way too slow. The first hour was a little bit anoying. I loved the first one, and this one is not bad. But after waiting for so long, it felt like Star Wars I. It wasn't bad. But come one, even though the effects were better, the sequence was kind of lost.

    I normally prefer action over drama; but in reality you need a balance of the two, and that didn't happened. As a member of the audience, I want to feel as if I cannot take my eyes of it when I go to watch a movie, and I didn't feel it this time around.

    Also, there were a lot of terms thrown at you really fast and too much at the end. The scene with the Architect should have happened way before, and this movie should have been about it. In general, it looked like a four hour movie that was cut at two on purpose without solving much.

    The bottom line is that it's got a lot of great scenes and awesome effects. It's taking the original plot and making it a lot more confusing. Too many little plots happening on the first hour that were unnecessary, making it loose substance. I'm definitely a fan, and I will certainly buy the DVD. But since very possibly there will only be three parts to the Matrix saga, I would have wanted this one to have been better. Possibly there was a messed up in the editing...

  228. What happened to Tank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to Tank?
    What happened to Tank?
    What happened to Tank?
    What happened to Tank?
    What happened to Tank?
    What happened to Tank?

    Tank was one of the best roles in the first movie. And from what I understood on this one, him and his brother died. This was another stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, ..., stupid, stupid mistake of this movie. They really fucked up on this one. The second one doesn't remotely compare with the first one. THEY FUCKED UP WITH ABOUT $100 MILLION IN THE BANK!

    I hope the do a better job on the next one.

    If you haven't gone to this one, don't! It doesn't compare. Too much money and still it sucks!!!!

  229. They BLEW UP Columbine HS ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They BLEW UP Columbine HS ! I can't believe it. Kids on a rampage after seeing this movie. What's the world coming to?

  230. Re:Much better than ANOTHER "Judas" segment. spoil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get it - the second judas isn't human, it's a machine. In the first movie humans are in the matrix, in the second one programs are beginning to escape into the real world.

  231. Re:Deeper meanings - Keanu dispels some rumors by justin_w_hall · · Score: 1

    SPOILERS - but you already knew that.

    I've been putting around the matrix-in-a-matrix idea since Wed. night... and it seemed to make the most sense, but then I read this interview with Keanu and he pretty much shoots down both the matrix-in-a-matrix idea and the Neo-is-a-program idea. While it's nice to have confirmation, it still leaves me wondering how he stopped the Sentinals, which I think is really the key to figuring out what's going on.

    My theory originally was matrix-in-a-matrix. But now I'm forced to evaluate other possibilities... only thing I can think of is that Neo has some control over the machines he didn't have before. That's either because:

    (1) Smith left some 'imprint' on him, in the same way he had an imprint on Smith, and their 'connection' makes it so that Neo can control the machines. This may be how he saves Zion in Revolutions...

    (2) another poster in the previous discussion mentioned the 'neo wireless' thing - that Neo can be simultaenously conscious in the matrix & the real world, and that somehow that gives him the ability to stop the machines... or

    (3) some program in the Matrix (Persephone, the Architect, Smith) - or simply the fact that he's the One - changed him in the real world (remember the Architect commenting on how "the process has altered your consciousness"?). Now, in the real world, Neo is superhuman because of it. (that one's lame tho).

    I gotta say that one of the sweetest things that I think is coming out of this one is the fact that the reason Neo is able to beat the machines and will eventually win is because he makes choices and doesn't accept that purpose/destiny/fate drives him to a predetermined goal, that his choices are what take him to the end he meets. It seems that every 'sentient' program in the matrix continually goes on about how purpose is all that matters - because a program, naturally, is written for one purpose and that's all it knows. Kinda spiffy.

    --

    ---
    "how can the same street intersect with itself? i must be at the nexus of the universe!" - cosmo kramer
  232. What's Smith's motivation? by digicosm2 · · Score: 1
    OK, one thing my friends and I couldn't figure out..

    Obligatory --spoiler-- warning!

    If Smith is 'free' from his masters and presumably has free will to do whatever he wants, why is he still chasing after Neo? Why doesn't he go and retire in that nice castle up in the mountains we saw, for example?

    The only answer we could come up with, is "he's the bad guy" and that's l-a-m-e...

    1. Re:What's Smith's motivation? by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

      The answer that I came up with is... Now that he is trapped in the matrix with the rest of the programs (humans etc whatever) his movtivation is purly revenge.

    2. Re:What's Smith's motivation? by MojoMorph · · Score: 1

      It's interesting you should bring this up because I posted a comment about it earlier. Agent Smith is now a virus. I have my own ideas about it, but I suspect the why/how will be answered in the next movie.

  233. Missing the Big Picture. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    I believe that the Matrix is making FAR more money than the box offices state;

    (1) The DVD of the Animatrix actually has some direct tie ins with the movie, which in effect, in order to understand the plot entirely, is needed. What's the price of that combined with the box office per die hard Matrix fan viewing? $28 or so. So that actually translates as approximately 60 million in indirect box office revenue.

    (2) The game, "Enter the Matrix" allows you to play as Niobi or Ghost, in the roles of the characters from the movie, from their perspectives. In addition, it also gives more definition to the plot of Reloaded. Translated in terms of ultra die hard Matrix fan numbers, that means the movie has taken in close to 100 million in its first day.

    $8.50 average for the movie ticket. $19.95 for the Animatrix DVD. Another $49.95 or so average for the Enter the Matrix game. All of which are vital to understanding the entire plot. Now assuming there's 100 million fans buying all of the above, then you're talking a shitload of money.

    And for the spoiler:

    And how many here, after seeing "Last Flight of the Osiris" thought it would have no bearing on Matrix Reloaded? D'oh!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  234. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by tmortn · · Score: 1

    The infection theory is interesting... I like it. The 'getting it comment' was mostly a troll, I knew some people had to of but everyone that was talking was talking about lameness and what seems to be very periphial issues compared to what happens in the last 10 minutes or so. Smith's survival on the Zion Side, Morpheous's crisis of faith which will likely be a huge part of the next, and of course NEO using 'the force' to take out the squidies in the 'real' world.

    Perhaps the connection is that direct, I mean after all NEO destroyed Smith by infecting him etc... I'll have to think on it some more. However at least for now I think their connection is more philisophical than it is direct. Yin & Yang kind of stuff ie the prophecy generates a human outside of the rules and thus the machines follow. I call it the law of the comic book....every hero needs a worthy vilan and vice versa.I think the alteration in Smith and NEO is the changing of the rules regarding transport from Zion to 'The Matrix' IE Smith is in Zion and NEO can alter it in someway as well.

    The thing that disturbed me was that at the end of Matrix he learns what morpheous meant by when he understood he wouldn't have to dodge bullets and yet he limits himself to physcial interaction this movie except when he saves trinity. Smith learns the fact that he can in fact alter the matrix, not bend its rules, alter it via replication. NEO is fighting like he did initially instead of by altering the code. In my mind he should have been far more cerebral when facing lesser opponents in this one..... course that dosn't make for nearly as much excitment in a fight scene. I want a DVD for slow mo in the architect scene... all those monitors have got to be hiding something.

    The brothers impressed me with something else also, the division of the machines, the deffinate life that they possess in that they do change, that they do have a free will, that they do compete. The first movie presented this solidity of the machines that was inhuman in the extreme. IE if there was AI where was it ??? did it just work to enslave the human population... where was the machine equivalent of the slave master etc... is that the architect, the oracle, the other AI programs inside the matrix ? Do they have physical correlations like NEO outside of the Matrix ? The squidies and harvesters didn't suffice at all for me as representatives of AI. So the programs in the matrix didn't have physcial form it seemed and the machines 'outside' didn't have AI, or at least not very impressive AI. Whats the harvest of power for ? What are the machines doing besides enslaving the human race ?

    Now the question to me seems to be if freedom from the matrix is physical freedom or merely control of the program. The control of the illsion of choice. It also makes the choice to enter the Zion matrix very interesting. Something tells me that revolutions is going to have one of those brain twister endings rather than a true 'The End'. Perhaps something along the lines of the machines didn't enslave us... we enslaved ourselves.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  235. Trinity-using-the-terminal scene by ericvids · · Score: 1

    Reaction #1: The Wachowskis are definitely clued. Karma++.

    Reaction #2: It's waaay into the future and they're still using SSH?!

    --
    Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
    1. Re:Trinity-using-the-terminal scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is NOT the future inside the matrix! It is a simulation of right now inside the matrix. It's perfectly logical for them to be using an old version of SSH. Especially since that wasn't an installation of the machines she was hacking into or anything, it was just an ordinary power station.

    2. Re:Trinity-using-the-terminal scene by Baiken · · Score: 1

      that`s the proof that the machines left alone to their resources always find the simplest( occam`s razor theorem)and most efficient solution for a problem, in second renaissance 2 you see that obviously the machines are way more prepared to fight than humans, as their solutions for war are much more organic looking.

      that`s in the side of hardware, thinking about soft it is obvious that OSS can solve problems in simpler ways, like the old russian tanks, just change what is needed and only that, so the matrix is powered by GNU and the architect is the reincarnation of richard stallman, I always thought he was up to something evil :)

      " I have only one little trouble with reality... I live in it!!!"

  236. Worst Cliffhanger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Ever.

  237. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    It seems that the subconscious makes the decision to move the hand, then the consciousness rationalizes this into a "decision" afterwards.

    This is only true if you accept a 1980's version of psychology predicated upon the concept of unified consciousness. That idea was tossed out some time ago, as we now know that what we perceive as 'unified' is actually based on consensus.

    To put it in layman's terms, what you think of as the 'self' - a single person, you - is actually a conglomerate of disparate 'mini-selves' with varying goals and motives. What you think of as 'you' is actually the sum total of these selves, in essence 'voting' to decide what 'you' will do. This in no way strips you of free will, if you're wondering about the philosophical implications; it's just that you aren't a single, discrete, easily described 'program' of consciousness.

    This model of human thought is now fairly well accepted, no doubt in large part because it explains why people sometimes do things that're completely out of character - and that they themselves can't really explain afterwards (although they almost always attempt to rationalize a motive after the fact). While the mini-selves generally act in a predictable, consensual manner, sometimes the conflict results in an atypical 'vote' - followed by atypical action.

    The experiment in question isn't really ground-breaking. All it does is bolster this view. In this case, the decision to move the hand was indeed reached by conscious decision, but the realization of that decision didn't occur at the 'unified' level until a brief time after the fact. This can actually be replicated in a number of different ways, through different experiments. Think of the decision having to pass through a layer of administrative bureaucracy before management stamps it for approval, even though the lower echelons have already implemented the decision in question.

    You still have free will. It's just that 'you' aren't a single person, but alot of little persons acting together. Or at odds, as the case may be, with the biggest voting block winning control for that particular decision.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  238. The Matrix == teh GAYtrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, seriously folks, am I right or what?

  239. What's next? by cdemon6 · · Score: 1

    while the big screen version forces the hacker to change the system's root password -- in this case to "Z1ON0101." (Note the numeral in the place of the 'I' -- more hax0r style.)

    Ok, it's time to update my l33t hacking wordlist and begin scanning random ips for root telnet/ssh logins. ;)

  240. Matrix movie by koutkeu · · Score: 1

    If anyone can find good numbers on this movie, i would realy want to see RIAA type flawed logic. I dont have numbers but i would bet alot that Matrix will make $ records and will be the most "pirated" movie. If we follow RIAA logic we could then say, look it's the most pirated movie ever and it made records in Box office, so more a movie gets pirated more they make $ ! :) - Reverse RIAA logic works too.

  241. spoiler of the third movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously (judging only by the comments on /.):

    The "real world" in the first two movies _is_ a second level of the matrix.

    "True history": human-caused ecological disaster happened in the early 21st century. Humans were going to die. Some maniac scientist created a multi-generational "hive" of suspended animation humans to repopulate after the earth's biosphere healed itself. But: in addition to preserving humans, he wanted to be sure that the new population of humans wouldn't repeat the same old mistakes. So he made the matrix as a "video game" -- no generation of humans is allowed into the Real real world until some of them make The Right Choices -- which is what Neo will continue to do.

    Neo and what's-her-name plus maybe a dozen real humans (who neo is able to intuitively identify among all the 10ks of AIs he encounters in the matrix) emerge into Paradise (the healed earth, with ruined cities) and set about the task of repopulating.

    There -- I save you $12.50.

  242. What did the French guy say when he was cursing? by linchutran · · Score: 1

    Hi, anyone catch what the French guy said when he said that French is the best language to curse in?

  243. "Screen Room" in Matrix 1 & 2 by Slur · · Score: 1

    I just watched The Matrix again after seeing Reloaded. There is a cool transition at the beginning of the scene where Neo first meets Agent Smith. On several video screens we see Neo sitting in a featureless room, and the camera slowly moves into the screens and then we're in the room.

    Those screens. I had wondered about those screens. Where were they? Who was watching the interrogation? Apparently it was The Architect.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  244. A couple of questions by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    I got the feeling he had a connection into the Matrix (courtesy of Smith's failed attempt to take over his brain?) and that was why he could defeat the sentinels at the end, rather than the real world was another simulation, ship-in-a-bottle style.

    Anyway, someone explain this bit of silliness to me: The guy in the real world Smith cloned himself into tries to assassinate Neo on the outside. He uses a cerimonial dagger, slices his own hand, then runs after Neo & friends.

    WTH was that all about?!?!? Why would Smith slice his hand with a ceremonial dagger prior to an assassination attempt?

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    1. Re:A couple of questions by redcane · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he was intrigued by experiencing the real world, and wanted to know what the sensation was like. What I really wonder is what his motivations would be, now that he is not an agent any more.

    2. Re:A couple of questions by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      I almost got the impression that he'd been driven slightly mad by the whole process - like it wasn't perfectly done, so his mind was falling apart.

      Creepy to have him on the ship, regardless.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
  245. if you really want to know what it is... by tabby · · Score: 1

    The Matrix is nothing more than a computer simulation stuck in an infinite loop. The Architect only thinks it is the sixth time because static int MatrixInstance has overflowed.

    Man creates AI, AI tries to deal with life/humans/etc by running simulations to deal with every possible outcome. Due to complexity of the task AI becomes stuck in infinite loop.

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
  246. The fight scene music sucked big time by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    The fight scene incidental music was terrible. In the first one, it was a masterpiece, throbbing and keeping in time with the action. It's like some clown working on TV did the action music in this one.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  247. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > "You're not here to make a choice, you've
    > already made it, you're here to find out why
    > you made that choice"

    When the Oracle started talking about this, I started thinking back to the mentor superhero in Mystery Men with all his stereotypical words of wisdom that they all kept making fun of.

    "You're not here to make a choice, you've al..."

    Then Ben Stiller cuts in, "Yeah yeah, I know, you're here to find out why you made that choice."

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  248. Is Zion destroyed at the end? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    At the end you see some sentinels getting into Zion at night while it sleeps. Then someone talks about how everything was destroyed, then they keep boring deeper into the earth.

    What did I miss? Did Smith let them in? How did they get ahead of where Zion thought they were, so much so that they were just sleeping normally? Or was that not Zion but just looked like it?

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  249. Zionism == Judaism by Christian+Schladetsc · · Score: 1

    I am not anti-semitic. Zion is the fabled ancient Jewish homeland. As you know, google is your friend, and I wont insult you with links. I am also quite aware that even mentioning this connection opens me for labelling as an anti-semite. Zion is the fabled ancient Jewish homeland. In the Matrix Universe, it is projected as being the last bastion of humanity against adversity. Make your own connections. Or not. But this is such a blatant pro-Jewry phenomenon, and I am outrageously amused that no-one has made the open connection. It's also curious that so many of the lead characters are black, yet Jews and blacks are traditionally placed at opposite ends of contention. Clever? Make up your own minds. Just ensure you are making your own minds.

  250. Re:anyone else think... *SPOILER* by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > The fleet was massacred, but they weren't
    > exactly defending the front gates. Zion is
    > still there, at least for the time being.

    That makes more sense than that Zion was destroyed, then "they started boring downward again."

    HOWEVER, what was up with all those sentinels sneaking into Zion in the middle of the night?

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  251. Google Search ... WHOA by pjammer · · Score: 1

    With countless parodies and spoofs of The Matrix online, I was as surprised as anyone else to discover what the #1 result for the Google search term "Matrix Spoof" was.

    Heh. ;)

  252. Holy Cecil B. DeMille, Batman! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > as the 45-minute credits scrolled by

    Evidently they had to list the names of every one of the 275,000 extras for the Zion scenes.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  253. Re:It was all a lie in The Empire Strikes Back als by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > So what if the fight scenes were unnecessary.
    > They were still way better than anything that's
    > been put on the screen since the original
    > Matrix.

    Ahh, therein lies your error. There were very few "WOW" moments. As comparison, the fight scenes in the ripoff "The One" movie were a lot better than all but a few brief moments here and there in this one.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  254. In the end of the third movie by Habberhead · · Score: 1

    We are going to find Neo waking up from in front of his computer, with his headphones still on and drool all over the desk.

    Just as Alice woke up at the end of Wonderland, this is all just a dream for Mr Anderson.

  255. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by mstra · · Score: 1
    A friend of mine noticed that Agent Smith is like a replicating virus now, and when he enters Bane's "real world" mind, he is cutting his hands into bloody lines. When he is stopped from killing Neo, he shakes his hand. My friend theorized that somehow Neo got infected by that blood.

    I could be wrong, but I'm fairly certain that Bane sliced his left hand, and shook Neo's hand with his right. The only reason I noticed this is that Bane seemed to make a quick and uncomfortable switch of the blade from one hand to the other.

    m.

    --
    Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
  256. It's not a rave, it's Saturnalia by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > On an off-tangent note i'm not so sure about
    > defining it as a rave

    It's not a rave, it's Saturnalia.

    Societies that want to build population fast have such ceremonies, for obvious reasons. Spread the gene pool around randomly, nine months later a whole new crop pops out.

    Then Christianity & friends come along and fuck things up.^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^ H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^ H^HThen the future is wonderful!

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  257. Yep. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with you. The idea that the "real world" is actually a Matrix is

    a) Far too easy and trite

    b) Not really supported by the facts of the movie. It makes a lot of sense that Neo is connected to the machines in some way since he is intertwined with the code that runs them (according to the Architect). This, IMO, is why he could stop the Sentinels dead in their tracks.

    Also, there have been a lot of indications that this "edition" of The One is different from the others: programs keep being surprised in one way or another by him. The Malevingian(sp?) made this pretty clear, as did the Oracle.

    I am fairly sure that Revolutions will depict the overthrowing of the machine order by a human (Neo) who is capable of imposing control over them, but perhaps will choose not to. We'll see.

    --

    +++ATH0
  258. Zion or Africa? by applejacks · · Score: 0

    There sure are alot of black people in zion.
    In the real world, our world, lots of people are concerned with self image. Buying the right car and customizing it. Sound systesm etc. So you'd think more white people would be poping out of the matrix level 1 into the matrix level 2.

    All that aside, You have to accept that they are still in the matrix. Remember the SPOON

    "One of the orphans asked me to give you this."

    "He said you would understand."


    So I have a far fetched idea. I think Neo is in a comma in a medical room hooked up to a machine. :)
    Oh well, Did anybody catch the trailor at the end of reloaded I was out the door when the credits hit.

    1. Re:Zion or Africa? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Two arguments. 1. If you want a really racist argument, but one that I would never actually push as being legitimate, you'd have to ask about how easily minds are to convince of the truth. Those who will fall for anything are more likely to be set free, because they will see the truth more quickly. Then again, the machines could turn them more easily, so perhaps not. Like I said, I would never push this argument as legitimate, because it ultimately falls through. I just thought I'd mention it before someone else did... 2. Much more legitimate: If the machines just started to annihilate everything when they took over, then those most likely to survive (ancestors of Zion) would be those less likely to be involved with "Zero-One" (the machine nation, see AniMatrix) -- in other words, less technologically advanced countries, which unfortunately leaves a lot of Africa and South America. This could explain why Tank and Dozer were brothers. :-)

  259. I saw it at the 42nd St. AMC by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    ... and it was pretty fantastic. The seats in there are great :) Plus it's right next to EasyEverything which is another huge bonus, of course.

    See it. It's good. Don't listen to the critical morons. Yes, there are cheesy bits, but on the whole it fleshes out the first movie a great deal.

    --

    +++ATH0
  260. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by MeanGene · · Score: 1
    Uhhh... according to The Architect, he sacrificed the entire human race by not going through the door on his right.

    I don't think so! Architect offered him an if-then-else between "graceful reset" of the software (reloaded!) or run until SIGSEGV. :-)

    It is only after that that Neo discovered that the "real physical world" is actually also part of the Matrix - he killed sentinels.

  261. Re:Deeper meanings - Keanu dispels some rumors by naasking · · Score: 1

    I was thinking that the machines might actually select The One when Zion reaches a certain size. They pick a new born, and implant some extra hardware in his mind that allows him to interface with the matrix and control it. Thus, they create the cycle of Ones. Since Neo is carrying some special circuitry he has learned to control machines in the real world with it and that's how he stopped the Sentinels.

    The Smith connection could also be due to this hardware.

  262. Meh. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Hating a movie because of a technical inaccuracy (the battery thing) is pretty anal, wouldn't you say?

    Regardless, it's somewhat clear to me now that the "battery" thing is just an excuse. Possibly (probably?) what is more likely is that the machines are using the human population either for research or as a big computation farm.

    --

    +++ATH0
  263. The "cat's" name by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    was Bane (or possibly Bain). He was the individual taken over by one of the Agent Smiths. This is significant because it means that he singlehandedly caused the rout of those five ships at the battle which occured at the "junction point" where the machines were digging through a tunnel.

    Or were you just not paying attention?

    --

    +++ATH0
  264. Record Opening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck, the movie opened on bloody Thursday, some theatres even showed it on Wednesday night! Of course it's gonna be a record opening when you open 3 days ahead of the "normal" weekend.

  265. Re:TRINITY DIES!!! OMFG! :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to Geekizoid, shitbreath.

  266. Re:use of language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Bold Marauder:

    I want to e-mail you, but I'm not sure I've correctly de-obfuscated the e-mail address in your profile, and I need you to tell me if I've done it correctly. What I've come up with is boldmarauder@yahoo.com. Is boldmarauder@yahoo.com correct? boldmarauder@yahoo.com is your e-mail address, right?

    Thank you very much for your help.

  267. [ SPOILER ] Zion-borns v Freed social status by MyHair · · Score: 1
    Real zion-born people seemed to hold more social status then the copper-tops who were once part of the matrix...


    Well, in Matrix 1 Tank was proud of being Zion-born, but other than that I didn't see an indication of superiority in either movie. And many people are proud of where they're from, and it could also be a sign of a minor victory over the machines that humans procreate outside the Matrix.

    In fact in Matrix Reloaded the head council guy was from the Matrix; he said he spent the first 11 years of his life sleeping, an obvious indication he was from the Matrix. I thought I remember seeing his Matrix interface holes, but now I'm not sure.

    ---SPOILER---
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    If the architect was right, then that means the council are the people who were chosen to 'restart' Zion after the last massacre? The architect said there were so many men and so many women...I need to go back and count those council members.

    The more I think about this the more what he said seems to fit into it. He might've known what Neo's purpose was and was preparing him for it. But then he seemed uncertain of what Neo's purpose was, or perhaps he did and was seeding the idea that the machines couldn't wipe humans out completely because they need us; perhaps he regrets that they helped the architect by choosing the seeds last time and hopes Neo won't cooperate and sees what happens.

    By the way, I left the movie when the credits started but later read thre was a "surprise" after the credits. What did I miss? Thanks.
  268. Re:What do you MEAN 'it was nothing like this one' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Bold Marauder:

    I want to e-mail you, but I'm not sure I've correctly de-obfuscated the e-mail address in your profile, and I need you to tell me if I've done it correctly. What I've come up with is boldmarauder@yahoo.com. Is boldmarauder@yahoo.com correct? boldmarauder@yahoo.com is your e-mail address, right?

    Thank you very much for your help!!!!!!

  269. what else was new here? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    The other bits of philosophical content (epistemological skepticism, etc.) were introduced in the first film and not further developed any significant amount in this one (besides merely being reiterated).

  270. Compare and Contrast (min spoilers) by Wrangler · · Score: 1

    Okay, bought tiks, went home, watched the first movie on DVD (yeah, geek), watched second movie. The first movie presented a coherent vision, while the second movie does not. I suspect (if I could ask the brothers Wachoski) that my impression reflects interference by the studio and big money, rather than lack of vision by the directors. Replaying the movie in my head (a useful skill for a mere human), I can clearly see how the scenes were "storyboarded" yet the translation from concept to celluloid lacked the coherence of the first film. Agent Smith lacked the "dread" that his character so clearly exuded in the first film. Other characters lacked the conviction of their first movie counterparts (definitely skirting spoilers here). Summary: too much comic book and too little time for philosophizing.

  271. Re:Remember the movie "Hackers"? by styrotech · · Score: 1

    Agreed, of course that was the reason, but that wasn't my objection - the previous poster held Top Gun up as an example of using 'real' stuff as opposed to some hacking movies using 'fake' stuff. I just found that comment ironic.

  272. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

    I did say "According to The Architect", I was just addressing the question posed by the parent of my post. I pretty much agree that there are tremendous implications of the last 5 minutes of the film with respect to the validity of what everyone in the story has said and believes about The Matrix.

    --
    Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
  273. Re:The people who find Matrix to be deep philosopy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I've only seen one Scooby Doo cartoon, but it was actually pretty cool. At the end the ghost that had been threatening the protagonist team turned out to be a bad guy in a mask, who would have gotten away with it except for the team of heros (darn kids!). I thought it pretty inventive writing, and can't wait to see another episode to find out what they do next.

  274. Re:anyone else think... (Spoiler?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    """
    They are celebrating real life;
    """

    Except for the very real possibility that we're going to go all 13th Floor (cheesy sci-fi from 1999 after the original Matrix) where *none* of it is real because everybody's in a MetaMatrix -- which is how Agent Smith got out over the phone into a real body.

    Besides being bored out of my skull up until the Oracle showed up with SQL Ser... er, Seraph, I was really quite surprised at the lack of ordinary people in Reloaded. In the original, the ending foot-chase scene started off with a guy screaming about Neo swiping his cell phone, went through a market with kids screaming as their parents turn into agents, a pensioner's apartment where the lady in the kitchen gets agent-ized... all very real-world events and locations with people who have a couple seconds to display some emotion before the machines take advantage of them. Reloaded had one normal lady (with groceries at the beginning of the burly brawl) who was given enough camera time to make an impression of the innocence that's perpetually at-risk inside the Matrix.

    That's where Reloaded really fell down. People in Zion were surviving, not living -- the planet was hosed and they had no clear path to un-hose it and no clear desire to, either; they were living either to beat the machines or because they couldn't think of anything better to do. But the people who were inside the Matrix -- you know, those people Morpheus and them-all wanted to save? -- never had a chance to generate any sympathy with the audience. Hence, when we got to the architect, it didn't matter that Neo was going to cause the billions of Matrix people to die because we didn't feel that they were alive -- most of the people we saw on screen were software -- and it didn't matter that the revellers in Zion might fall so long as their would-be savior was at risk of losing his love-interest.

    All-in-all, a visually stunning but depressingly mind-numbing film that didn't care enough about its inner workings to warrant seeing again before I get a really freakin' big widescreen TV.

  275. Re:[ SPOILER ] Zion-borns v Freed social status by mandolin · · Score: 1
    By the way, I left the movie when the credits started but later read thre was a "surprise" after the credits. What did I miss? Thanks.

    Preview for the third film. It was ok, but not worth sitting thru 15 minutes (swear to god) of credits complete with deafening obnoxious music. It wasn't as exciting to me as the preview for Reloaded.

  276. Warning: I am a big fucking wad of flamebait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    " The current year in the Matrix was circa 1999 (the height of human civilization). "

    And Bush II was put into office in 2000. Coincidence?

  277. WRONG! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Gross boxoffice is the correct measure, as we all know that the *AA's only see you as a source of $$, not as a person.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  278. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by SablKnight · · Score: 1

    OK, I admittedly have only seen it once, (to be remedied sometime soon...) but in the Architect scene, the monitors are shown to represent not only Neo 6.0 but also all of his 5 predecessors. People keep saying that Neo 6.0 is making a different decision than the others, but when he turns towards the door that can save Trinity, don't all the monitors show Neo 1.0-5.0 turning in exactly the same direction? Is this maybe the predetermined choice, and he is continuing the cycle?

    -SablKnight

  279. this is an excellent example by smitty45 · · Score: 1

    of how you fall back on your standard "I'm right and smart, listent to me, you're all dumb" posts. just when I thought you were gone, you're back, posting crap. didn't that guy who you threatened sue you yet ?

  280. Liberace - wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long have you been sucking your own dick?
    Thanks for the pre-school introduction to philosophy. Keep at it - maybe one day you'll get it.

  281. Re:messing with head? -- SPOILER ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHy choose from the two doors? Why not bust out thru the wall, or choose to remain there forever?

  282. Zion is NOT The Matrix by kaigeX · · Score: 1

    Too many people have latched on to this theory. Listen...the Matrix is not multitiered. The theory that Zion is another Matrix is wrong. If you're interested in my argument, here it is: http://www.livejournal.com/~kaigeX

  283. Matrix Reloaded dvd screener by JabbaOnTheDais · · Score: 1

    Anyone got all the dvd screener yet? Its 4 cds, really nice quality. I've got cd 1 already from the release site (http://afwz.r8.org). saw movie in theatres! Best movie ever!!! can't wait for revolutons!

  284. The Matrix Reloaded by alcharn · · Score: 1

    The Matrix Reloaded was not as good as the first, but is something definitely worth seeing. The technology used is incredible and I feel this is one of the few movies that could get away with it! It is exciting and visually stimulating!

  285. Better Value by the Byte... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matix Reloaded $9.00
    Mortal Combat III $0.50

    Save your $8.50 and enjoy a game of the arcade fighter...

    Mortal Combat III is less violent but at least
    the game has an interesting story line . . .

    They should name this new movie:

    . Matrix : Regurgitated .

    ___is it over yet ...
    ______is it over yet ...

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

  286. BIN 101 = 5 DEC Zion 5.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could Neo have taken a step backwards to Zion 5.0 ?

  287. Re:Disapointed caliphate of death clitoris chopper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    CLITORIS CHOPPERS. Hi there you fucking Islamic career clerics, doctors of death, Waffen Schutzstaffel doctor Josef Mengele is a patron saint compared to you fucking ragheads. You suck. You aide and abet terror and death. You are partially responsible for the deaths of other fellow men. For this fratricide you shall pay dearly. Your soul is black with the stains of inaction, ineptitude and sympathies to those who walk the dark side. Your foul life is full of sins, not religious, just heinous, your karma is low, you don't confess, and you aren't in prison where you belong. You are your own dark, kept secret. I see through you, the worthless academic, the pseudo intellectual, the unproven unpublished un patented WASTE OF FUCKING FLESH. You are a drain on society, you are a member of the 1st world but pretend to not be. I hate you, you are a stained man.

    Hi clitoris chopper, you islamists support clitoris carving. You are Islamic, and of course are a fucking animal. I hate you you pull-start camel jockey lover. Towelheads, Camel Jockies, Sand Niggers, Ackmids, Abeebs, Carpet Flyers, Dune Coons, Rag Heads, Sand Scratchers, Habeebs, Abba-Dabbas, Camel-Humpers, Demi-niggers, Fig-Gobblers, Hucka-luckas (hucka hlacka ghalcka ghugh), Lefties (If you steal, you lose the right hand so, since they are thieves...) Ocnods, Pull-Start-ables (imagine pull starting Ossama's dirty rag like a Briggs and Stratton), Roach-Ranchers (habibs cant kill roaches by a tenant of Is-slum), Sand Moolies.

    Shut up all you dirty fucking Islamic pigfucking swinehundts and the pigs, the communist fuckin Islamic terrorist supporter.

    Take your fucking Koran and cram it up your ass. The sooner the earth sees Islam leave it, the better off it will be. Your Koran is Goat Piss.

    I hope if there is a God and a Hell, you have to drink the liquidy shit from a Pig's ass, and Jewish Rabbis defecate on you.

    I hate the stupid ISLAM fucks who read into the trash they come up with. Saddam Hussein [who needs to take a dirt nap] is higher on my sanity list than fucking Muslim "clerics." In fact, I like Saddam more than most of the other Arab leaders because he is secular. We should fucking nuke the Saudis and Mecca and Medina and turn it into rubble, then tell Saddam to remove the heads of all the buttfucking "royalty" in the area.

    I want to wipe my ass with Mohammad's shroud. I want to grind his body up into bone meal and fertilize my garden with it.

    Our tortured dead scream out in HORROR, asking for vengeance:
    1. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
    2. Kill all Mohammedans.
    3. Kill all Dune Coons.
    4. Kill all Rag Heads.
    5. Kill all Towelheads.
    6. Kill all Arabs.
    7. Kill all Camel Rooters.
    8. Kill all Osama Bin Laden supporters.

    Nuke their countries to hell.
    Nuke them again.
    Death to Islam.

    I piss on Mecca. I wipe my ass with the Koran. I shit upon Mohammed. I wipe the cum for a freshly fucked pussy with Mohammed's shroud then throw it in the pig sty so it can mire in pig shit as it decomposes.

    I only hate with words, you fucking wet towel fucking scum killer, you maim, your terror bomber. You will be judged and cast away by the powers that be, your death will get none of my pity and you will have precipitated it upon yourself, YOU xenophobic pieces of shit, your elitist religious country club will be your own undoing.. In the great continuum that it time your are those who serve to disrupt it by ending the brilliance and lives of those who your zealous foul religion call heathens and infidels. Your death will be celebrated, you will not be missed. My rhetoric is a reflection of my anger at your, your Islamic death leaders, and your religions unwillingness to admit to what it really is, a death mongering cult. Your religion is one which produces nothing that is meritorious, your artisans are not accomplished or made paria