Slashdot Mirror


Flash Mobs: Peaceable Assembly for Spontaneous Fun

Schmendr1ck writes "The Orlando Sentinel is carrying a story on the growing trend of 'creating a crowd on a moment's notice for no particular reason' knows as a flash mob. Recent flash mobs (sometimes hundreds of people) have wandered into into an upscale NYC shoe store acting like confused tourists from Maryland, gathered at the Hyatt near Grand Central Station for 15 seconds of spontaneous applause, and converged on the Macy's carpet department to debate the quality of the rugs for sale. Check cheesebikini? for pictures and info on past mobs, as well as links to sites that organize these events. Sounds like a fun, harmless, and Constitutionally-protected way of blowing off a little steam."

380 of 543 comments (clear)

  1. Constitutional protection! Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just wait until someone high up views this as a threat and that Constitution guarantee gets brushed aside as something from a "different era" like concerns about quartering soldiers.

    1. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by sweetooth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually it's not constitutionally protected anyway. These people are doing this on private property and can be removed at any time by the request of the owners. If they fail to leave they are trespassing. If they decide to do this in a park or a public space then it would be constitutionally protected under the right to free assembly, however doing it in Sears doesn't fall under that category.

    2. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they decide to do this in a park or a public space then it would be constitutionally protected under the right to free assembly

      In NYC you need a Public Assembly Permit ($150) for any gathering of more than 20 people.

    3. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by MrLint · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps you will recall the "kmart" incident. This is where the cops took it upon themselves to hold a 'raid' on people in the in the parking lot of a 24 hour kmart and a fast food restaurant. There was no complaint by kmart and the cops arrested people who has just exited both the kmart and the fast food joint without cause, under the auspices of 'loitering' or something else equally as stupid.

      Im going to end my commentary here.before i get more irritated. It might please you to know that the cops got in a shit load of trouble and all the people were un-arrested.

    4. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by MrLint · · Score: 1

      well they do say that everything is bigger in texas.

    5. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Informative

      I followed your link to the kmart incident and read further because I was outraged also...but found that the police were basically handed their collective asses after this fiasco happened.

      The police chief was also fired and went through a lenthy trial...though he was aquitted later. His police life is over though.

      It's not like the police did this and just got away with it...they were slapped down pretty hard...which brought a smile to my face!

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    6. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you were to actually go to the newspaper site and READ what really happened, you would be singing a different story.

      Here is a quote from one of the newspaper stories about this incident:

      "Houston cops planned for weeks to swoop down on a parking lot and nab a bunch of drag racers but couldn't find any when they got there. So, what the heck, they just rounded up everyone in the parking lot outside a 24-hour Kmart and a Sonic Drive-In and charged the whole bunch with trespassing. No joke."

      Here's the address of the story...I suggest you read through it and find that the police chief was fired and went through a trial and the entire police dept of Houston got slapped down pretty hard.

      http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/special/ra id /1542463

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    7. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by eidechse · · Score: 1

      While some innocents got caught in the process, I say the police handled the matter correctly.

      Arnaud-Amalric, is it really you?

    8. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is hardly the same thing. Yes, the police were completly out of line in this case and were handed thier asses because of it. My point is that if you assemble on private property and are asked to leave you have no constitutional protection that allows you to stay there. The people that have been "flash mobbing" have been doing so in malls and other "public" places that are privately owned. If at any time these people are asked to leave and do not, they are tresspassing. Your story is completly unrelated, and is a blatent example of police abusing thier authority.

    9. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Heem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would you mind it if a bunch of slashdoters came over and slashdoted your private property?

      I can just imagine the 4 guys peeing on your lawn, in the shape of the letters "FP"

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    10. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by mcc · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Hey!! You kids!! .. What are you DOING? Hey, I don't know who you are or what the heck that is you're pouring into your pants, but get off my lawn..!! Yeah, you heard me, if you're going to be doing that do it somewhere else..!! ... wait, don't leave your trash here! ... HEY! .. stupid kids.. leaving behind their.. what the heck is this thing, anyway, looks like some kind of statue.. uhh..

      WTF, Is this supposed to be Natalie Portman??"

    11. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Princeton Illinois just made it illegal for groups to assemble in public. Big story around here. Tired of the kids causing trouble or something like that. I never cease to be amazed at how quickly the fundamental tenets or our society can be brushed aside.

      If one cannot freely assemble in New York, then citizens of the place are no longer free human beings as defined by the Constitution. No debate required, that's just the way it is.

      The question then becomes:

      How much do you value the ideas presented by the Constitution?

      And hey, maybe the brand of freedom offered in New York is good enough for your tastes. But don't take too much consolation from that. Look around the world and back through history and you'll see human beings finding all sorts of things palettable. If you get enough people content to subside on dogshit, that's what they get. You want to have better and keep it, you're gonna have to demand better. How demanding is America of it's freedoms in 2003?

      If concepts had graves, the headstone for our lost freedoms would read:

      "If you have nothing hide, you have nothing to worry about."

      "You have nothing to worry about if you're not doing anything wrong."

      What merits hiding? What is considered wrong?

      Who determines these things if there is no longer a Constitution to define the spectrum of what a free human being can expect to be able to do within his own life?

      Could you be content to place the entirety of your freedoms sqaurely in the lap of John Ashcroft? How about a future that contains a succession of people just like him, one after another. Mix that with corporate governance and policing as witnessed by the DMCA and RIAA.

      The future will continue to be grim so long as we have a populace that's too foolish to understand the value of the protections given by the Constituion.

    12. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but you seem to be wanting to eat your cake and have it too. As the grandparent said, if you assemble on private property, you can be asked to leave and be forced to comply. If you take away the right of the owner of private property to expell guests that create a distrubance, then you are striping the owner of his rights to privacy. Thus, your inclusion of the current actions of the RIAA as something bad seems to run counter to your apparent claim that people should be allowed to gather wherever they damn well please.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    13. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by LS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How do you differentiate between a mobber and a shopper? Should the store owners and cops learn how to read minds? These people do not know each other. There is no central organization. How do you know who is in the store legitimately?

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    14. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by jsailor · · Score: 1


      I'm sorry, but NY hasn't been free for almost 2 years now. Walking past men and women in fatigues and bearing M16's has not instilled a feeling of freedom in me. You simply can't do business in this city if you lose your wallet or leave license at home because you'll never get into your office or any of your client's buildings.

      We're also making it more difficult to be homeless by installing "dividers" in the new park benches - at least at the new subway stations - so that people can sleep on them.

      Freedom is an illusion and a nice story. Wake and realize your freedoms are disappearing every day.

    15. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you see 150 people doing a robot dance outside of a Sony store (as was seen in the Mall of America flash mob), it's fairly safe to assume that the guy in front of you doing a robot dance is involved in it.

    16. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Possible next mob event: hundreds of people purchase packet of chewing gum, all wait in line at the same register.

      All of 'em customers.

    17. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      If one cannot freely assemble in New York, then citizens of the place are no longer free human beings as defined by the Constitution. No debate required, that's just the way it is.

      Umm, it has ALWAYS been that way. There is no right to assemble in the United States and there never has been. Nowhere is this more necessary than in New York. You have a 27 square mile island populated by 2 million people, with an additional million working every day.

      This group is probably small and not really obstructing anything to the point harm is caused, but I guarantee you if that sat in Macy's for an extended period of time they would be arrested.

      Same thing if they blocked a major street.

      You need a permit to assemble on public property, don't have one? you will be removed by the police.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    18. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      I never cease to be amazed at how quickly the fundamental tenets or our society can be brushed aside.

      This is because most people think of the 1st Amendment as their freedom of speech, not everybody else's. They like it, until somebody else says something they don't like. You know, they say things like, "Freedom of speech is OK, but some people go too far."

      FOS is a two-edged sword and you have to accept that or go find yourself a nice fascist state that agrees with your political slant.

      And this is a (loose) quote from Voltaire: "I diagree with what you say, but I defend to the death your right to say it."

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    19. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by NumbThumb · · Score: 1
      That's something i've been musing about for some time now. Here in Germany, it is your constitutional right to assemble (peacefully and without arms) in any public place.

      However: City Parks and Squares are not considered really public: The city's administration has "domestic authority" (Hausrecht) which basically means they are allowed to ask you to leave. (Note: you don't have to be the owner of a place to have the "Hausrecht" there: If i rent an apartment, i would even be able to throw out the actual owner if s/he comes without prior notice).

      This leaves you with the posibility to go demonstrating out in the woods, although there are not many woods in germany that are truely public property. If any...

      So what's the use of a Consitution if it gets cirumvented permanently? I personally thing that every law should routinely be tryed by the supreme court (or equivalent) before it takes effect.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
    20. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      There is no right to assemble in the United States and there never has been.

      First Amendment:
      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      Or has the First Amendment been repealed already?

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    21. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 1

      Correction:

      The police chief was not fired. He wasn't even in town when the raid went down. The captain in charge of the raid, Mark Aguirre, was fired and charged with official oppression, but was later acquitted.

      Chief Bradford DID step down briefly, but only because he was being tried for perjury in a case involving the aforementioned Aguirre. (There was also talk from Aguirre that he was being punished for the K-Mart thing in retaliation for getting Bradford in trouble.) The judge dismissed the case saying the prosecution had failed to provide any proof in their case. Bradford went back to work, but has since announced his resignation. The K-Mart raid is possibly one reason, but a much bigger reason would be the HPD crime lab which was so screwed up the department had to shut it down, and retesting has already cleared one person who's currently serving time for rape.

      It's a mess of a situation, but in short, the police chief was not the one directly fired for this fiasco.

    22. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Idiot! You scared them off before they covered her in hot grits!

    23. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by akb · · Score: 1

      This is a frequent tactic of unions. They'll pack store checkout lines with people that have overflowing shopping carts and say "oh I forgot my wallet at home" when its their turn. Its pretty effective.

    24. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by che.kai-jei · · Score: 1

      what if you could prove you had to be there as constitutional/human right? let us look at religion. no really. sociologically it is an organised system of worship based on fundamental beliefs underpinned by individual faith. with these broad criteria we could assume eating at macdonalds or shopping at sears would be the expressive act of worship of a particular religion. like consumerism. or the cult of MAcD's. the iconography of the various logos embellished for our easy identification of products and allegiance like the golden arches in macdonalds. you pay money to them so they keep going; like a donation. you convene there individually or with family and friends and feast together. incant the holy words such as Big Mac. and so forth. you praise ronald while decrying the sinful and deceitful nature of the hamburglar. so your right to worship could be abused if you cannot convene at your appropriate place of worship. the sony flashmob could've been seen as an artistic/religious display of worship in honour of sony and its supremacy in the consumer elctro/robotics field. my point is [and i think i might have one somewhere.] on a pure, legal, constitional basis the rights of the owners are being abused by flashmobbing. however... there are loopholes and people wondering what flashmobbers are trying to say should do well to think about what large multinational conglomerates' unbridled success/world domination says about western peoples. how we co opted their sparkling gleaming concepts in return for convenience due to our laziness at the expense of the small operator (whose business model may or may not have been outmoded). we betrayed ourselves. now many of us would like to make up for it. yes, i show my hand freely. i am a woolly impractical anti-capitalist. but i can be pragmatic; when elections are manipulated and politicians are so conservative, the only thing they will stick their necks out on is making wars that only large corporations and financial institutions want (they could've acheived anything... but they gave us this. its not political suicide toeing the line... y'know?), it is imperative that we find as many practical ways of saying things we mean on large level that can compete with the obliteration of human expression by bland conformity enforced almost lethally, the mass flood of propaganda that many depend on as an information source and both the malignant indifference of the so-called 'private tyrannies' and the benign indifference of the disenfranchised individual. if it costs millions to get anyone elected anywhere in the west and the money comes form private minority interests and their policies are baseless lies, vague generalised pledges/promises [either way they are never kept]. it wuold follow that maybe democracy and free speech are underrated concepts even in the west. it is known and obvious that everyone needs them as guaranteed rights. but it is then seemingly unimportant that we dont really have them and freely acknowledged that it wont change and that this is as good as it gets. we may have them one day but until then, we have things like being nuisances to people. for example. if one were so inclined, one could organise a 'meatspace DDoS' attack, like flashmobbing many branches/franchises of one particuar company across continents for a few hours. watch share prices fall. but that is naive and a more malevolent application of ones right to free expression that would hurt many than is the intention, surely, of most flashmobbers. apologies for this post in advance but i have been paring it down trying to make it make sense.

    25. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by NoData · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      Aschroft: "Define peaceably. Define assemble. Define petition. Define redress."

      Or has the First Amendment been repealed already?

      Alas, define repeal.

    26. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      "Here's the address of the story...I suggest you read through it and find that the police chief was fired...

      Well, I read through the article you linked, and despite my best efforts could not find that the chief was fired. I did find that the only mention of the police chief was that he promised an investigation of the raid, and that it was going to be an opportunity for the chief to come down on the Capt. that performed the raid.

      Further reading in other articles on that web site reveal that the chief did eventually resign his post, but that this incident was merely one in a series of incidents that led to his resignation - like the HPD crime lab screwing up DNA tests.

      So the next time you tell someone to RTFA, you might want to actually do so yourself.

    27. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by ClydeJr · · Score: 1

      Of course, the ex-captain who was in charge of the raid is now planning to run for Houston city council...

    28. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by operagost · · Score: 1

      These are not peaceful assemblies either. I don't think that the noise produced by 100 people applauding or debating the merits of a rug in Macy's is peaceful.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Xiadix · · Score: 1

      Not true. There will be some people that have no idea what is going on but decide to join in.

      "That looks fun, lets join in"

      This is the same reason people line dance.

      KevG

    30. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      The people acting "weird" in union, or plainly stating thier intent to sit and "watch the movie" would be easily identified as the flash mobbers. Of course the store owners can ask anyone they don't like, or think is acting inappropriatly to leave so it doesn't really matter.

    31. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      And it serves a purpose which is pretty much out of the question for the flash mobbers.

    32. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Ummm...you can't try a law that doesn't exist. Said law must be challenged by someone (I assume by actually breaking it) and then the law's constitutionality can be tested.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    33. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No the police were NOT "handed their asses" over the issue. Most of the pigs involved suffered no reprecussions at all. Basiclly, all that happened was that the department offered up a couple of sacrificial lambs (one of whom was allowed to resign instead of being fired) to take the blame off of the rest of them.

      Whould SHOULD have happened, is that EVERY SINGLE OFFICER involved in that incident should have been immediately terminated; banned for life from working in anything resembleing law enforcement; and had all their assets siezed and liquidated; the proceeds going to compensate their victims. I would even argue that prison time equal to the collective time that their victems spent in the lockup would be in order.

      When the people who actually abuse the power entrusted to them are held accountable, and PUNISHED for that abuse of power, rathar than being allowed to pass the blame off on to a handful of scapegoats, THEN I'll smile about the pigs finally being "slapped down pretty hard". But what happened here was nothing of the sort.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    34. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      I did read it, and you did what I did. that's what I suggested...to look at ALL the articles, I only linked to the one I quoted from.

      But you ended up reading more, as I did. And you found, as I did, that the police simply didn't "get away with it".

      Also, I never said RTFA at all. Well, I did kinda...but not that harsh. hehe

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    35. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      You can assemble on your own property, not on other people's property.

      Obstructing roads or impeding someone's business is not peaceful assembly.

      But it was a poorly worded post. the examples I gave are true however. These rules HAVE always been strictly enforced in NY however, as chaos can result otherwise...

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    36. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by ravevisuals · · Score: 1

      Not if you do it at places and serve a positive purpose. Flash Mob at the old http://www.pittsburghfoodbank.org n'at!

    37. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by graphic+equaliser · · Score: 1

      The knub of the arguments here are that a large gathering of people in a public place which is done for fun or uplifting purposes, is now totally illegal in the UK and most states in the US, because of fears of violent uprising or coup-like activity. The fault is in the authorities who do not deploy sufficiently well funded technology to detect terrorists, not in the constitutional rights of peace-loving, fun-making masses. Again, governments ensure that the masses suffer because of a few nasty individuals, yet there is still one law for the poor, and another for the rich and powerful. Huh! Time to drop out of this sham.

      --
      The world should be a noisy place, instead of a silent-unless-poisoned-into-loudness-by-alcohol place.
    38. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by rarkm · · Score: 1

      You forgot the official mantra:

      "Anything I don't like is blatantly unconstitutional...Anything I like is a right enshrined in the Constitution from time immemorial. [Name or Organization here]'s attempts to [description of reasonable proposal here] is a dangerous assault upon [name or description of true believers] and by extension, upon all Americans"

      Repeat this 1 million times and you will see God....or at least Benjamin Franklin who looks remarkably like what God would look like if he had been an 18th century democratic revolutionary.

      --
      [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
    39. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      You evidently didn't read your parent poster very carefully. The conversation had already drifted from private property to public assembly (the $150 public assembly permit in NYC comment). They were pointing out that the constitutional right to freely assemble in public is being slowly torn apart, and most people just seem not to care.

    40. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't read it at all, as apparently my filter blew it away. Gomen.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    41. Re:Constitutional protection! Ha! by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm broken slashcode. Gotta love it, eh? :)

  2. I remember this! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a bunch of hippies!

    Let's spontaneously "get together," if you know what I mean. It'll be fun!

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    1. Re:I remember this! by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Fark said it best:

      "[STUPID TAG] Latest fad: Flash mobbing, where a bunch of morons gather in an assigned area and pretend to be performance artists"

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    2. Re:I remember this! by superyooser · · Score: 1
      if you know what I mean.

      See some hippies take a ride on a bus to blow off some steam.

      if you know what I mean. It'll be fun!

      I don't know. They take the flash mob thing literally.

    3. Re:I remember this! by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1

      performance art: people in public pretending to be artists.

      artist: a jobless hack pretending to have talent.

      --
      sig not found
  3. Bunch of morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How the hell do these people have enough free time on their hands for this shit?

    1. Re:Bunch of morons by nifboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      They don't waste their time posting on /.

  4. One Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why? What's the point?

    1. Re:One Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's fun, that's the point.

    2. Re:One Question... by km790816 · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY!!

    3. Re:One Question... by LS · · Score: 1

      What are you, a robot?

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    4. Re:One Question... by Ugmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's like one of the Lego built CD Changer Hacks, the MIT Practical Joke Hacks or Doom in Text Mode Hacks.

      There is a mental challenge also:
      It is mildly complicated to plan and organize. There is an element of imagination involved in coming up with a surreal situation to use the crowd in.

      It is also like art using people.

      If there was an actual practical purpose to the afore-mentioned Hacks then that would detract from the fun and Hack value of it.

      In the same way, if these crowds met to protest something then people wouldn't even pay attention to them. They would see the protest signs and say - oh, more protesters.I live in NY and there are picket lines and protests everyday and they are all ignored.
      The way it is now people notice the flash crowds BECAUSE there is no purpose to them.

      The only time protestors are noticed is when they become violent like in Seattle, disrupt traffic or otherwise do things that are probably counter-productive to the cause they wish to promote. It might feel cool to participate in such mass protests, but I think they have little effect on policy e.g. the protests did nothing to stop the war from taking place in Iraq or in bringing home the troops.

      I would actually appreciate a recent example where protests accomplished something in the US except increase security at WTO meetings.

    5. Re:One Question... by tuj · · Score: 1

      "I would actually appreciate a recent example where protests accomplished something in the US except increase security at WTO meetings."

      Vietnam. Negative public opinion, fueled largely by massive protests with good media coverage was probably the biggest factor in ending the war. (warning, gross generalizations regarding the Vietnam war here, but for the most part they suffice). Protests can accomplish something, but their significance is the public's eye is measured largely by their size or frequency.

    6. Re:One Question... by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      Why? What's the point?

      Just in case the British come back and we need to make another militia.

      Quickly! Flash mob to the harbor! Bring 'em if you got 'em!

      I tried being funny... honestly... but I just got woke up at 1am by a client who yanked the power cord of their mailserver accidentally and couldn't bring it back up: manual fsck required. Now I can't sleep. fsck me.
    7. Re:One Question... by packeteer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only time protestors are noticed is when they become violent like in Seattle, disrupt traffic or otherwise do things that are probably counter-productive to the cause they wish to promote.

      I don't blame you for not knowing but people were not getting violent in Seattle during the WTO protest. I live near Seattle and although i was not there i know many people who were including my father was was taken into a holding cell for no reason and released when they realized he was a member of the BAR and they didn't want that.

      Many of my friend were shot with rubber bullets and left with bruises for no reason other than being in a crowd. You might not believe me if i say this but i knew a cop who wanted to be involved just so he could shoot people doing nothing. Now im sure not al the cops there felt like that but i know there were enough to cause some trouble. There were soooo many camera's there that i would bet no act of violence was missed. When i watched on the news at night all i saw was violence but only a little but. They would loop the same two clips of people breaknig windows but it was nothing like it was portrayed on TV. EVERY single protest was peaceful and most of the police didn't do anything wrong. The problem was when someone totally unassociated with the protest went near them and starting breaking things. Then the police would go all out on the protesters. The worst part of the stores that were broken the only ones being protected were corporate stores. The assholes who were breaknig stuff did not discriminate between corporate and other stores as the media claimed. It was no protesters breaking the nike store. It was some assholes breaking anything before they were caught.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:One Question... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Well... the cops that beat Rodney King and were aquitted were unconstitutuionally
      retried and some found guilty after the ensuing riots.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    9. Re:One Question... by Blimey85 · · Score: 4, Informative
      people were not getting violent in Seattle during the WTO protest

      I do blame you for being a moron and trying to skew the facts. Yes there were violent people. Yes they were blocking sidewalks, streets, shops, etc. Yes they basically shutdown most of downtown seattle for several days. I live just 10 miles south of Seattle and I saw much of this first hand. I've also seen a couple of documentaries about the protests and while I think the cops were out of line on more than one occasion, the protestors were not the innocent angels you make them out to be.

      Why did you fail to mention the bottles and debris being thrown at police officers? It's sad that we only see what we want to see. You apparently wanted to see peaceful protestors being victimized by the Seattle Police and so that is what you saw. Maybe you should look again and see the truth.

      You should be able to find any of a number of documentaries on the protest at any local library in Seattle or the surrounding area.

      Back to the topic at hand, what are the flash mobbers hurting? They show up, gather for a few moments, and then disburse. I don't think there is enough time for anyone to become annoyed with these people. I think most people would still be in shock by the time it's over. With the WTO protests you had individuals "manning" the streets and key intersections pretty much around the clock.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    10. Re:One Question... by akb · · Score: 1

      Aside from increasing security at their meetings, the protest in Seattle was actually spectacularly effective in bringing more public attention to the workings of international bodies like the WTO, IMF, World Bank. Before Seattle, how many people even knew these institutions existed? How many op-eds in the New York Times defending these institutions were written?

      Its really simplistic thinking to presume that a protest, or any other single act, by itself will have a dramatic influence on an issue. Most protest organizers do not. People seriously engaged in effecting policy from a grassroots level expect years of work. Sometimes protests may be a useful tactic, no serious campaign has them as their only tactic.

    11. Re:One Question... by Ugmo · · Score: 1

      I think that the WTO protests are a bad example. People had to resort to violence to get attention. The majority of the people were peaceful, but media felt the story was in the violence and focused on that.

      A good example of peaceful protests that worked were the civil rights marches in the 60's. But that was a relatively new thing in people's minds. I think protests have become such cliche's no-one pays them any mind any more.

    12. Re:One Question... by Ugmo · · Score: 1

      Whether or not there was violence committed by every single protestor or just one passerby, the only part of the protest that was focused on was the violence. The peaceful, non-disruptive protestors are ignored by the media and by the people they are protesting. 60 style sit-ins and protests are no longer effective politically. They make the people participating in them feel good but they accomplish little. They are a nostalgia trip. Old hat. They might as well be going to s square dance.

      You need novelty and creativity to attract attention.

      That is what attracts attention to these flash crowds. They are not protestors, that is a novelty. People are trying to figure out why they are there, what is the meaning, what is the purpose. Since there is no meaning, purpose or reason, people have to expend a lot of brain power figuring it out. If it becomes a major trend then they will be ignored unless there is a lot of creativity involved in each individual "event" (and no violence)

    13. Re:One Question... by Urox · · Score: 1
      and I saw much of this first hand. I've also seen a couple of documentaries

      I was there also. I saw things first hand. For the most part, the protestors were peaceful. There was a small group of anarchists from Oregon who decided to smash things. The first times this happened, the police weren't doing a damn thing. Some of the protesters cornered and surrounded the guys making trouble, but the police wouldn't even come over and arrest them.

      The problems started (imo) when people were protesting AND obeying the "curfew zone" and the police were given authority to shoot at random into the crowd. People taken into custody were not given due process and were held in busses in poor conditions longer than legally allowable. I saw some of the bottles thrown right up on capitol hill (this is still Washington State). This was after the police were already shooting and tear gassing. I saw more tear gas canisters thrown back than bottles. And the curfew zone was enlarged at will. I was in a perfectly okayed place when the police decided they wanted to shut down Broadway (street).

      Pretty much, us Seattle people were pissed and thank ghod the authoritarian incompetant mayor was voted out.

      --
      "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
    14. Re:One Question... by Ugmo · · Score: 1

      Vietnam and Civil Rights marches in the 60's are legitimate examples of success.

      However, "recent" is a relative term. The Ice sheets from the last Ice Age have "recently" retreated according to geological time.

      By recent I mean in the current political/ media climate. Say since the widespread popularity of CNN and newsbite media.

      Most protests that make the news are, as I've said before, ones that turn violent, or ones that the local government cracks down on violently. To CNN that sort of thing makes good pictures.

      The only protests that come to my mind recently are:

      Tianimin Square, WTO protests, Million Man March on Washington, various anti-war in Iraq protests.

      Tianimin Square did not bring democracy to China, The WTO protests turned violent, and the as far as I know (and I could be wrong) the Million Man March achieved nothing and there was a war in Iraq as if all those thousands (millions?) of people who marched didn't even exist.

      I really do believe protests are just a nostalgia trip for those who wished they were at Woodstock and missed out.

    15. Re:One Question... by akb · · Score: 1

      The protesters at the WTO meeting were not violent. There was some targeted property damage but no one was physically harmed by protesters. The police on the other hand were well documented beating and spraying seated protesters.

    16. Re:One Question... by Ugmo · · Score: 1

      The perception of them was that they were violent, even if there were only one or two news shots showing violent people (probably unaffiliated with the actual protestors, e.g. looters who tried to take advantage of the police being occupied elsewhere).

      The perception is such because the news organizations showed the pictures. They showed the pictures because that's what they think is newsworthy. The peaceful protestors were not focused on. The peaceful protestors therefore did not attain their goals.

      News organiztions and average joes do not think protests are interesting unless there is violence by the police in trying to clear the protestors out, or violence by protestors gone bad, or there is a major problem with traffic because of the protest. Otherwise no one pays attention. That is my whole point. Protests no longer are effective. They are passe. Boring. Do not get the message across. Are often ignored or treated as an inconvenience.

  5. Eww, Flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't they program the mob in proper W3 approved HTML instead of Flash? Until they do this, I won't want to join, even if it's a CowboyNeal fan mob.

  6. Constitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sounds like a fun, harmless, and Constitutionally-protected way of blowing off a little steam.
    I thought they phased out that Constitution thing a few years ago.
    1. Re:Constitution? by EverDense · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, to paraphrase Homer:
      "The Constitution, is that thing still around"

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    2. Re:Constitution? by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You just rubbed out the part which outlawed cruel and unusual punishment!" :)

  7. Constitutionally Protected in some places... by NoTheory · · Score: 5, Interesting

    However in places like columbus ohio, as far as i'm aware, it's illegal to gather more than 6 people in public places with out a permit from the city. So i guess it's protected so long as you jump through the proper hoops. Sort of cuts down on the spontinaity thing. (although, i don't think i've ever heard of such a regulation being enforced)

    --
    There are lives at stake here!
    1. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by TroyFoley · · Score: 1

      However in places like columbus ohio, as far as i'm aware, it's illegal to gather more than 6 people in public places with out a permit from the city.

      Good thing malls are privately owned.

      --
      After I have received the wisdom of good teaching, I will untiringly teach all people. - The Teachings of Buddha
    2. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Good thing malls are privately owned.

      Malls are still public places.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      It's not the same thing. The owners or managers of the mall have every right to ask you to leave. If you don't you are tresspassing and can be arrested.

    4. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by jnik · · Score: 2, Informative

      The U.S. Constitution does not gaurantee the right to peaceful assembly. It gaurantees that the US Congress shall not pass any laws that prevent peaceful assembly (without 3/4 approval). AFAIK, the first amendment doesn't prevent state governments from passing such laws (or cities from passing such ordinances).
      10th amendment is usually interpreted as applying the bill of rights to local and state governments, basically saying (don't have it handy) "states shall not infringe upon the rights of their citizens."

    5. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1
      That's the fourteenth amendment. Tenth says that powers not specifically delegated to the Federal Government belong to the States and/or the People.
      No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
      ...is what you're looking for.
      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    6. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Ok, while it doesn't say that states cannot pass laws, the structured nature of law makes those laws invalid.

      The constitution is the highest law in the land, and if congress doesn't have the right to make those laws, why should states? (ok, a bit of a flimsy argument. I'll shut ut up.)

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    7. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Jonner · · Score: 1
      You seem to be forgetting about the rights reserved to the states:
      Amendment X
      The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
      prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
      the people.

      This is one of the things that makes this a federal system, rather than a monolithic republic.
    8. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Supreme court does have that right in an offhanded way, it can interpret the constitution in any way it pleases.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. Gosh, isn't flat assertion fun?

      What's more fun is providing references. You have no constitutionally protected rights in a mall, not even your first amendment rights.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      Uh... Remember what happened at crossgates mall in Albany, New York?

      http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/crossgates1 .h tml

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    11. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      But they're not "privately owned" if they're owned by a Public Company.

      Yup... PUBLIC COMPANIES are given charters FIRST TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC, and SECOND to secure a special legal status from the Gubmint (let 'em sell shares, special regulations apply to them, etc.)

      By saying 'This is "Private" property, they're showing Bad Faith in dealing with the People, and violating their charter.

      An honest Judge would dissolve the comany, and revoke the charter for the audacity.

      New York State's got a bunch of "Civil Rights Laws" which guarantee equal access, too. You can trump a Tresspass violation with a few counts of that, and if you'd care to, there's a bunch NICE Federal codes that are VERY RESTRICTIVE... (Did someone tell you to do this? Yes? Good! That's a FEDERAL FELONY... 10 years, in a Federal Prision,

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    12. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

      Haven't they already deleted that bit? I mean they're currently holding a bunch of people without access to representation and just about to execute half of them without trial....

    13. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You have no constitutionally protected rights in a mall, not even your first amendment rights.

      Do tell. I do have first ammendment rights - here's a cite. I also have most of the rest of my rights - I may not be able to carry a firearm around in a mall, but I can't be illegally searched either. I would assume that your cite on the first ammendment limitations apply more to disruptive activities, which protests certainly are.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps you should read the cite. The first amendment activity in question wasn't the protests, it was the wearing of an anti-war shirt that sparked them. Also, when did non "peacable" become the same as "disruptive"? It's almost impossible to assemble without disrupting someone.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    15. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      In my opinion these are not the same things. In this case the defendant was wearing a t-shirt. Not disrupting the other people around him. Some people didn't like his shirt, but he was under no obligation to remove his shirt. In one description of the flash mobbers they invade an electronics store and announce that they are there to catch the "flick." They apparently have no intention of buying anything and are potentially making it difficult for legitimate customers to purchase products sold within that store. The owners would be well within thier rights to have the mobbers removed.

    16. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Only 6 people? So some families sitting in the park are breaking the law?

    17. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Politburo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes that's true. Except Bush is one of those people (read: right-wing) who like to read the letter of the Constitution, rather than interpret the spirit.

      The letter of the Constitution says that those people are not citizens, and are therefore not under jurisdiction of the Constitution.

      The spirit of the Constitution is that we're all equal under the law (IMO, and of course, the Constitution says a lot of other things). Of course, when it was written, "all" meant white landowners, but the protections of the Constitution have since been extended to all citizens (except youths). It is quite hypocritical to stand up and speak about justice when you use loopholes to avoid enforcing your own laws.

    18. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by jnik · · Score: 1

      And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I should have just gone to Gutenberg. Of course they don't seem to have all the amendments, just basic bill of rights. Thanks for the correction, at any rate :)

    19. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      So I can just walk into the headquarters of Microsoft and start playing with their servers? Cool! Somehow I don't think MS Security/Redmond Police/Judges/any sane person would agree.

    20. Re:Constitutionally Protected in some places... by Iainuki · · Score: 1

      Notwithstanding the holding of US citizens as enemy combatants, the US Constitution doesn't make an explicit separation of citizens and noncitizens. The Fourth Amendment refers to "people," not "citizens." It's not unreasonable to read the enumerated rights as applying only to citizens, but applying them to all human beings is an equally reasonable interpretation.

  8. let me guess... by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... a lot of these people, especially the ones organizing on the web, are recently laid off techies, with copious amounts of free time on their hands.

    1. Re:let me guess... by spudchucker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Those who don't attend the mobs participate in a virtual one known as slashdot.

    2. Re:let me guess... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I was picturing them all as busy executives, taking time out from brokering power and making important decisions to set up a pointless gathering. But I would be wrong. :)

      Finkployd

    3. Re:let me guess... by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, execs do set up pointless gatherings, but they're called "off-site strategy meetings" and usually involve Vegas, bar tabs and strip clubs. Hardly the same thing as these flash mobs.

    4. Re:let me guess... by happystink · · Score: 2, Funny

      How DARE you mention the word pointless in the same sentence as Vegas, bar tabs and strip clubs! You disgust me!

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  9. Another name for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    People SPAM.

    1. Re:Another name for it... by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      It strikes me as deeply meaningful that an anagram for "Flash Mobs" is "Lbs of Ham."

    2. Re:Another name for it... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      I think I prefer the San Francisco Police Chief's (I think it was him...) description of it as "a random act of idiocy".

    3. Re:Another name for it... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      I think I prefer the San Francisco Police Chief's (I think it was him...) description of it as "a random act of idiocy".

      Not if you're a shoplifter.

  10. Flash mob flash by felonious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe they could further exploit this phenomenon by incorporating Stuart Tunic's (sp?) work?

    Flash mob flashing people....you know...whole shit like that

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
    1. Re:Flash mob flash by felonious · · Score: 1

      Oops I messed his name up.

      It's Spencer Tunick

      His site and you'll know what I mean..

      --
      You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
  11. Yes by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it's probably all a crafty plan to meet chix0rs.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Yes by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      "Crafty" meaning "Hopeless", of course.

    2. Re:Yes by happystink · · Score: 4, Funny

      When you use the word chix0rs, the hopeless is basically implied.

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  12. Chalk another one up for the slashdotted list... by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

    did anyone get to cheesebikini before it was brutally raped by the hoard of voracious geeks and nerds?

    (dontcha love my wording?) ;)

    --


    Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
  13. flash mobs by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

    did anyone else see the title of this story and think of a mud?

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  14. Knowing the hardware is one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but people who think assembly is fun are just weird.

    1. Re:Knowing the hardware is one thing... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      umm... Resistance is futile?

  15. back when WE were kids.... by grouchyDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the old days. This was our best approximation. Back when I was a kid we'd get one or two people on side of the road, and each "team" would pull on an invisible (virtual/imaginary) rope across the road. Most cars would slow down or stop thining there really must be a rope there, they just couldn't see it. Then we'd just walk away.

    I guess we should have tried recruiting other mine-wannabes.

    1. Re:back when WE were kids.... by soupart · · Score: 1
      Off topic I'm sure....

      I remember the first time I saw a pair of skates seemingly "skate" across the road in front of me. Same situation as you described, but in this case the rope was actually fishing line attached to skates with kids hidden from view pulling them across the road.

      Was freaky the first time I saw it.

    2. Re:back when WE were kids.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They called it streaking.

    3. Re:back when WE were kids.... by Lord+Zerrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      When your driving alog the road in a wooded area up in Maine and decide to pull over and point in to the woods, suddenly you have a lot of other cars joining you pointing and wondering what is going on. Then you leave quietly, and laugh at the herd.

      --
      "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." -Albert Einstein
      Karma? There's a serial modder out there.
    4. Re:back when WE were kids.... by fyonn · · Score: 1

      one of my friends went to a camera shop to buy a pir of binoculars. him and his dad took 2 pairs outside the shop and put them to their eyes to look at a nearby building to test how good they were. when they put the bins down to go back into the shop, there was half a dozen strangers around them, all looking in the same direction trying to see whatever interesting things my friend and his dad had been looking at....

      ppl eh?

      dave

    5. Re:back when WE were kids.... by gosand · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh. We had something in grade school we called the rock trick. I went to a Catholic grade school, run by the nuns. The side of our gymnasium was aluminum siding, and we used to have one kid stand against it, and another about 50 feet away. The kid against the building would have rocks in his hand. The other kid would pretend to throw things at him, and he would take a rock in his hand and while doing a dodging motion, would throw it against the siding to get the authentic "ping" sound. The illusion was that one kid was throwing rocks at another kid in a game like dodgeball. Every new substitute got introduced to the rock trick on playground duty. :-) We got in a lot of trouble. I won't even go into how we went into the basement of the convent and drank the beer in the nun's refrigerator.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:back when WE were kids.... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Your nuns had beer in their refrigerator??

    7. Re:back when WE were kids.... by gosand · · Score: 1
      Your nuns had beer in their refrigerator??


      Yep. A six-pack in bottles. It was in the basement, and that was about all that was in it. They were twist off tops, so we would open them, take some small sips, then put the caps back on. We had to make sure that they all had the same amount of beer in them. After watering them down a little to bring the level back up, we decided to quit while we were ahead.


      This was when we were in 8th grade, and our teacher was the principal. We were always helping to move things, and do work around there for "special projects" during our study halls.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  16. Larry Niven by dachshund · · Score: 4, Informative
    Why doesn't this article mention Larry Niven even once? I was under the impression that he coined the term ("flash crowd") in his earlier short stories.

    If I'm wrong, I stand corrected (in advance.)

    1. Re:Larry Niven by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's correct. Those stories (part of Niven's Known Space future history) took place after the invention of the matter transmitter. Whenever an interesting news story would break, bored people, reporters, whoever, would "flick in" by the thousands from around the country to see it firsthand. Once the cops would realize that a flash crowd was building, they would turn on "riot control" which would redirect anyone trying to flick back out to a central processing facility somewhere in Nevada, I think.

      Actually, this sounds remarkably like the Slashdot effect, only with people not Web hits.

      The first story I know of that mentions the "flash crowd" was "The Permanent Floating Riot Club", where a gang of criminals actually used flash crowds to steal.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Larry Niven by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Jump-Shift stories are slightly skew from the Known Space series. (The earlier end at least. By Ringworld, it's moot.) For example, All the Bridges Rusting doesn't fit into Known Space history. (Teleporting interstellar expeditions.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Larry Niven by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Tell Jerry-Berry I said "hi".

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Larry Niven by andreMA · · Score: 1
      Very true... but in this case it's just information being transmitted (not the people teleporting in) -- the crowd gathers from the local population.

      Haven't we see this previously, though, with crowds turning out on the streets to see police chases that have been televised (particularly in LA, but I believe that within the past year or so there was a case in Texas involving a flatbed truck run amok).

      Niven did seem to underestimate the power of information alone to generate this sort of effect. Or perhaps he underestimated the amount of free time people have. *sighs*

      Oddly, I just started re-reading Ringworld yesterday -- first Niven I've read in ages. I needed to wash the bad taste of the Rama sequels away, and re-reading Rendezvous with Rama would have simply pissed me off too much, realizing how badly Gentry Lee had butchered A.C. Clarkes' universe.

    5. Re:Larry Niven by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Hey, he's the guy who started the first flash crowd riot.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Larry Niven by Peter+Harris · · Score: 1

      I also remember a Bruce Sterling story where there was a distributed
      untraceable organised attack on a bank or something. Like the flash mob
      thing only much nastier.

      Hmm - now I couldn't possibly condone such a thing, but if IBM fails to
      take out SCO legally, I wonder...

      BTW. under UK anti-terrorist laws I had better make that clearer. It
      would be a terrible bad thing for 1000 criminals to just turn up in
      Utah one day and destroy a certain office within 10 minutes, then
      disappear without trace. I for one would want no part in such a thing,
      and I think we should all be told what date it is not going to happen,
      so we can all stay away and not be involved in it ;-)

      --

      -- What do you need?
      -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
    7. Re:Larry Niven by aebrain · · Score: 1
      You should have quoted the full article from wikipedia
      Flash Crowd was the title of a 1973 short story by the science fiction author Larry Niven, one of a series about the consequences of instantaneous, practically free teleportation booths that could take one anywhere on Earth in milliseconds.

      One consequence, not predicted by the builders of the system, was that with the almost instantaneous reporting of newsworthy events, tens of thousands of people worldwide would flock to the scene of anything interesting-- along with criminals, hoping to exploit the instant disorder and confusion so created.

      On the World Wide Web, a similar phenomenon can occur, when some web site catches the attention of a large number of people, and gets an unexpected and overloading surge of traffic: a notorious example is the Slashdot effect.

      Other reading:

      "Flash Crowd" is on pages 99-164 of the paperback edition of The Flight of the Horse, copyright 1973 by Larry Niven. The story (or parts of it) were originally published as "Flash Crowd" in Three Trips in Time and Space, copyright 1973 by Robert Silverberg, ed.

      "The Last Days of the Permanent Floating Riot Club" are on pages 41-52 of the paperback edition of A Hole in Space, copyright 1974 by Larry Niven.

      Other stories in this series are in these two books, and in All the Myriad Ways.
      --
      Zoe Brain - Rocket Scientist
    8. Re:Larry Niven by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "which would redirect anyone trying to flick back out to a central processing facility somewhere in Nevada, I think. "

      Well, at least they didn't get directed to a locked room with everybodies favorite goat man.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:Larry Niven by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Look for a sudden spike in demand for those Niven books at used bookstores today. Sort of a "flash crowd flash crowd" effect. Good thing there's lots of Akamai-style load balancing for those book servers!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    10. Re:Larry Niven by John+Murdoch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hi!

      Larry Niven might have used the term "flash crowd" in one of his novels--but the term "flash mob" has been in use since at least the 19th century. It was used to describe the loud and outre--"flash" in the sense of exploding powder ("a flash in the pan").

      The term was certainly in use by the 1930s--Dorothy Sayers refers to the "flash mob" in one of her stories about Lord Peter Wimsey.

  17. this isn't new by arashiken · · Score: 5, Funny

    flash mob, meet slashdot. ooo look! i see your server already knows us. don't worry, we'll be gone in 15 minutes.

  18. I hate to say this, by Daikiki · · Score: 5, Funny

    but it looks like the site has been. . .umm. . .flashmobbed.

    --
    I want the fire back.
    1. Re:I hate to say this, by danthedanish · · Score: 5, Funny

      or perhaps... flashdotted?

    2. Re:I hate to say this, by sootman · · Score: 1

      No way dude, it totally got Sentinelled. Go Orlando, woo hoo!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:I hate to say this, by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      No, this is real-life flashmobbing.

    4. Re:I hate to say this, by oever · · Score: 1

      Naah, the site's been fleshdotted.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    5. Re:I hate to say this, by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

      Nah. /mobbed.

      --
      I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  19. trigger happy tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    this is a re-occuring skit on trigger happy tv, where someone will blow a horn or something and a crowd of people in red robes will start worshipping someone. etc.

  20. Life imitates fiction? by Turbofish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else think of Larry Niven when they read this? Thank goodness quantum teleportation won't work on people... yet. (see http://www.wordspy.com/words/flashcrowd.asp if you don't know what I mean.)

    1. Re:Life imitates fiction? by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Wow, I had totally forgotten about that but the phrase kept nagging at me. Now that you mention it, it does remind me of that. Science Fiction scores another one..(well, minus the teleportation)

      --
      *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
  21. Drunk mobs by awful · · Score: 1

    Of course, not all flash crowds/mobs are good. IN Australia it is getting very difficult for a teenager to organise a party at their house and not have hundreds of mobile-phone toting gatecrashers turn up, get into fights, razz the police and steal all the beer.

  22. Re:The Klan has been doing this for years by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    An old idea.

    The new twist seems to be that no one is getting killed.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  23. NYC by Triv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was a part of one of these, and let me tell you it was a riot. One of the rules was you couldn't initiate conversation with anyone and that answers to questions were scripted. We stayed together for 5 minutes and dispersed, no one having said a word. It was surreal but wonderful, especially the looks on the normal people's faces, trying to figure out exactly what was going on.

    Triv

    1. Re:NYC by poity · · Score: 1

      Oh, if only I had mod points to shower you with!

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    2. Re:NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some people express themselves in flash mobs.

      Some by painting pictures.

      Some by writing.

      Some by being assholes on /..

      All are legitimate forms of art.

      btw, fuck youasdf

    3. Re:NYC by Javit · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It was surreal but wonderful, especially the looks on the normal people's faces...

      The desire to be special is one of the most "normal" human inclinations of all.

      You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

      --
      Support NRA, America's oldest civil rights group.
    4. Re:NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

      Sorry. but you really are a unique and beautiful snowflake, just like everyone else.

    5. Re:NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was just reading along, and POW, your somewhat incoherent and completely out-of-place comments hit me! Sure, what he did might not mean a whole lot, but it's completely fucking ironic that you would say that, and fail to realize that the same applies to trolls on slashdot! With such a dramatic outcry like that, you would make a good example for your army of drama queens to follow.

    6. Re:NYC by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      "Better to keep you mouth closed and have people think you a fool, than open it and remove all doubt"

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    7. Re:NYC by Lobo93 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of something I saw on Discovery the other night. Hmm, what was that again...something about small critters joining for a weird purpose...was pretty stupid. Ah! Them lem....lemmin...lamas?

      Life in the big city: when in doubt, act like a Lemming!

      --
      "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
    8. Re:NYC by Shadestalker · · Score: 1
      I was a part of one of these, and let me tell you it was a riot.

      (Score: 10, Deeply Ironic)

  24. Properly formatted version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    cheesebikini?
    July 24, 2003
    Flash Mob in Central Park

    Fred Hoysted was first to chime in with a report and a photo from the Fifth New York Flash Mob. SatansLaundromat.com was quick on Fred's heels with a report and a nice group of photos, including a larger version of the cropped shot to the right.

    They seem to have carried out a fantastic, bizarre idea: make a bunch of increasingly surreal "nature sounds" in Central Park.

    Did anyone make an audio recording? Please let me know if you did.
    Filed under flash mobs at 05:12 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (2) | Permalink

    Europe's First Flash Mob

    A flash mob went down today in Rome, as an estimated 100 to 300 people flooded a books and music megastore. They asked employees for nonexistent books. They broke into a round of spontaneous applause. Then they dispersed.

    Here's coverage in Italian from the newspaper la Repubblica, and here's a clumsy English translation. The photo, courtesy of la Repubblica, shows mobbers evacuating the megastore.

    In the comments attached to this posting, you'll find a report from our Senior Rome Correspondent "JJFlash."

    If you have more photos, please send them (or links to them) to photos[at]cheesebikini.com. More to come.
    Filed under flash mobs at 03:28 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0) | Permalink

    July 23, 2003
    Flash Mob News from Minnesota, Texas, Austria

    Minneapolis organizers put together an event (or rather, a series of events staged in different locations) at a huge shopping mall. Participant turnout was estimated at 50, but perhaps reduced secrecy about the next Minneapolis event will spur a larger crowd?

    New flash mobs are brewing in Vienna, Austria and in Dallas. (Here's an English version of the Austrian flash mob page, as automatically translated by babelfish.altavista.com.

    Flash mobs are a widespread phenomenon now with lots of people around the world taking part, so from now on when I mention flash mobs I'm going to focus on the most compelling flash mob coverage and opinion. For more exhaustive listings of the numerous local flash mob announcements, groups, sites and press coverage, check out flashmob.info, where anyone can sign up for an account and submit mob news or a link to a new mob group, or mob(b)log, whose creator "Alex" is doing a good job of listing media coverage but strangely fails to provide any way to reach him or to comment on his postings. In the meantime, Rob Zazueta is designing a site to make it easier for people to organize what he calls "flocks;" it's not done yet but you can keep track of it at flocksmart.com. Thanks for the resources, people!

    (By the way; have you seen The Word Spy's entry for the term "flash mob?")
    Filed under flash mobs at 05:18 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0) | Permalink

    July 19, 2003
    The First Italian Flash Mob

    Londoners have been talking about organizing a flash mob for weeks and weeks. Now, with minimal talk, it seems the Romans will beat the Brits to the punch and create Europe's first flash mob.

    Our Senior Rome Correspondent "J. Jack Flash" reports that a flash mob has been planned in Rome next Thursday, July 24. Here's the invitation: in Italian and in English.

    In other news: Flash mobs are arising in Boston and in Phoenix, Arizona.
    Filed under flash mobs at 10:15 AM | Comments (21) | TrackBack (0) | Permalink

    July 18, 2003
    Invitation: Manhattan Flash Mob #5

    Below is the invitation to the fifth New York flash mob as it was e-mailed to me. It's scheduled to take place next Thursday evening, July 24th.

    (If you're wondering what a flash mob is, see this entry for an explanation.)
    more...

    Filed under flash mobs at 12:14 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (1) | Permalink

    Ma che diavolo è un Flashmob?

    "J. Jack Flash" in Rome, Italy republished most of cheesebikini's flash mob coverage, after translating it into Italian. (For real fun see the translation back into English, courtes

  25. /. just flash mobbed ... by pherris · · Score: 1, Redundant

    cheesebikini's web site. Be careful what you wish for ...

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  26. Looks like the San Francisco Cacophony Society by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This looks a lot like some of the behavior engaged in the past (and present) by the the San Francisco Cacophony Society http://sf.cacophony.org/

    The increasing capacity for spontaneous social expression via the network is going to get a boost, now that *everyone* who is within proximity of a prank has a chance to participate.

    Yet another example of new social behaviors that emerge spontaneously at the 'edge' of the network.

    It's be interesting to see what new kinds of mass social behavior develop, and which ones manage to survive, and become institutionalized.

    As long as no one gets hurt, we could use a little levity.

    As stated on the SF Cacophony site: "The Cacophony Society is a randomly gathered network of individuals united in the pursuit of experiences beyond the pale of mainstream society through subversion, pranks, art, fringe explorations and meaningless madness. "

    Here's an excerpt about one past activity:

    Mad Santa Crawl:
    "each year at christmastime a crowd of santas descends upon one of san francisco's most-touristed neighborhoods to get drunk, to hand out disturbing gifts, and to frighten tourists.

    on december 16, 2000 a santa faction drove to a ranch in petaluma, spent the afternoon discharging firearms, then joined the rest of the santas for the evening's festivities in san francisco. about 150 santas took over grant street in chinatown, and they eventually headed up into north beach."

    1. Re:Looks like the San Francisco Cacophony Society by superyooser · · Score: 1
      "The Cacophony Society is a randomly gathered network of individuals united in the pursuit of experiences beyond the pale of mainstream society through subversion, pranks, art, fringe explorations and meaningless madness."

      I think I found one of its members.

    2. Re:Looks like the San Francisco Cacophony Society by CSharpMinor · · Score: 1

      I actually found something about the Cacophany Society from whilst researching Chuck Palahniuk, author of Fight Club. (Don't ask, it's an Ingrish Lit thing.) Straight from the horse's mouth: >>There's usually one host city that different chapters from around the world go to for one >>weekend, usually about two weeks before Christmas. Everybody arrives dressed as Santa Claus, >>using the name "Santa Claus," and the host city usually has two to three days of continuous >>events. People drink and party and sing, and disrupt big benefit parties, and are basically public >>nuisances. But the fact that there's 400 of them all in red makes them this stunning sort of moving >>artwork. They call it "The Red Tide." It's really beautiful. When I did it in '96, at one point it was all >>these Santas against this SWAT team of cops, because the Santas wanted to get into a shopping >>center that was private property. It was so beautiful to see all these blue policemen juxtaposed >>with all these red Santas, and all these crying kids that were like, "Why are you beating up on >>Santa?" This year, they're talking about Tijuana as the host city, but no one wants to get busted in >>Tijuana.

      --

      Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
    3. Re:Looks like the San Francisco Cacophony Society by CSharpMinor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Re-post with the proper fomratting this time. Sorry--forgot to check that little "HTML Formatted" thing which was hidden right next to the post button.

      I actually found something about the Cacophany Society from whilst researching Chuck Palahniuk, author of Fight Club. (Don't ask, it's an Ingrish Lit thing.)

      Straight from the horse's mouth:

      There's usually one host city that different chapters from around the world go to for one
      weekend, usually about two weeks before Christmas. Everybody arrives dressed as Santa Claus,
      using the name "Santa Claus," and the host city usually has two to three days of continuous
      events. People drink and party and sing, and disrupt big benefit parties, and are basically public
      nuisances. But the fact that there's 400 of them all in red makes them this stunning sort of moving
      artwork. They call it "The Red Tide." It's really beautiful. When I did it in '96, at one point it was all
      these Santas against this SWAT team of cops, because the Santas wanted to get into a shopping
      center that was private property. It was so beautiful to see all these blue policemen juxtaposed
      with all these red Santas, and all these crying kids that were like, "Why are you beating up on
      Santa?" This year, they're talking about Tijuana as the host city, but no one wants to get busted in
      Tijuana.

      --

      Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
    4. Re:Looks like the San Francisco Cacophony Society by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      In Greenwich Village, they're known as "Sado-Claus".

      --Adapted from a skit by Robin Williams

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  27. Excellent, thanks! by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

    :) some interesting stuff there...

    --


    Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
  28. Re:Chalk another one up for the slashdotted list.. by ChrisN79 · · Score: 1

    I think you need to get a room with yourself, buddy... you're not as witty as you think you are.

  29. Here are the first few stories by pb · · Score: 2, Informative

    cheesebikini?

    July 24, 2003
    Flash Mob in Central Park

    Fred Hoysted was first to chime in with a report and a photo from the Fifth New York Flash Mob. SatansLaundromat.com was quick on Fred's heels with a report and a nice group of photos, including a larger version of the cropped shot to the right.

    They seem to have carried out a fantastic, bizarre idea: make a bunch of increasingly surreal "nature sounds" in Central Park.

    Did anyone make an audio recording? Please let me know if you did.

    Filed under flash mobs at 05:12 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (2) | Permalink


    Europe's First Flash Mob

    A flash mob went down today in Rome, as an estimated 100 to 300 people flooded a books and music megastore. They asked employees for nonexistent books. They broke into a round of spontaneous applause. Then they dispersed.

    Here's coverage in Italian from the newspaper la Repubblica, and here's a clumsy English translation. The photo, courtesy of la Repubblica, shows mobbers evacuating the megastore.

    In the comments attached to this posting, you'll find a report from our Senior Rome Correspondent "JJFlash."

    If you have more photos, please send them (or links to them) to photos[at]cheesebikini.com. More to come.

    Filed under flash mobs at 03:28 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0) | Permalink


    July 23, 2003
    Flash Mob News from Minnesota, Texas, Austria

    Minneapolis organizers put together an event (or rather, a series of events staged in different locations) at a huge shopping mall. Participant turnout was estimated at 50, but perhaps reduced secrecy about the next Minneapolis event will spur a larger crowd?

    New flash mobs are brewing in Vienna, Austria and in Dallas. (Here's an English version of the Austrian flash mob page, as automatically translated by babelfish.altavista.com.

    Flash mobs are a widespread phenomenon now with lots of people around the world taking part, so from now on when I mention flash mobs I'm going to focus on the most compelling flash mob coverage and opinion. For more exhaustive listings of the numerous local flash mob announcements, groups, sites and press coverage, check out flashmob.info, where anyone can sign up for an account and submit mob news or a link to a new mob group, or mob(b)log, whose creator "Alex" is doing a good job of listing media coverage but strangely fails to provide any way to reach him or to comment on his postings. In the meantime, Rob Zazueta is designing a site to make it easier for people to organize what he calls "flocks;" it's not done yet but you can keep track of it at flocksmart.com. Thanks for the resources, people!

    (By the way; have you seen The Word Spy's entry for the term "flash mob?")

    Filed under flash mobs at 05:18 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0) | Permalink


    July 19, 2003
    The First Italian Flash Mob

    Londoners have been talking about organizing a flash mob for weeks and weeks. Now, with minimal talk, it seems the Romans will beat the Brits to the punch and create Europe's first flash mob.

    Our Senior Rome Correspondent "J. Jack Flash" reports that a flash mob has been planned in Rome next Thursday, July 24. Here's the invitation: in Italian and in English.

    In other news: Flash mobs are arising in Boston and in Phoenix, Arizona.

    Filed under flash mobs at 10:15 AM | Comments (21) | TrackBack (0) | Permalink


    July 18, 2003
    Invitation: Manhattan Flash Mob #5

    Below is the invitation to the fifth New York flash mob as it was e-mailed to me. It's scheduled to take place next Thursday evening, July 24th.

    (If you're wondering what a flash mob is, see this entry for an explanation.)

    more...

    Filed under flash mobs at 12:14 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (1) | Permalink

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  30. Party at SCO's and RIAA associations home tonight! by zymano · · Score: 5, Funny

    BYOB!

  31. Try this one by heli0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  32. Distraction by firewrought · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This article reminds me of Bruce Sterling's Distraction, in which a mob spontaneously forms to attack and overrun a corrupt bank w/o any apparent source of centralized organization or communication.

    It makes me wonder if we are on the verge of creating a trans-human intelligence capable of consciousness. Too bad we don't have any formal idea of what intelligence and conciousness is, or we could analyze the situation more closely...

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    1. Re:Distraction by LS · · Score: 1

      Jezus, your standards for "trans-human intelligence" are friggin' low!!!

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    2. Re:Distraction by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It makes me wonder if we are on the verge of creating a trans-human intelligence capable of consciousness.

      Nope. We're not. We're just minimizing individuality by removing context, thus encouraging our pack-instincts to re-assert themselves.

      Too bad we don't have any formal idea of what intelligence and conciousness is, or we could analyze the situation more closely...

      We have all sorts of formal ideas. But when we start to talk about them, some jackoff gets their religion embroiled up in the debate, and it we don't get anywhere. (Both theists and atheists are guilty here.)

    3. Re:Distraction by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      We are the borg.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    4. Re:Distraction by Shadestalker · · Score: 1
      It makes me wonder if we are on the verge of creating a trans-human intelligence capable of consciousness.

      Already done. It eats to obesity despite lack of hunger, is bored with any but the most frenetic and mindless of entertainments, and actively squashes any outside attempt to induce actual thought.

    5. Re:Distraction by firewrought · · Score: 1
      We have all sorts of formal ideas.

      I see intelligence (and sentience/conciousness) as a form of computation, just as evolution is a type of computation. We have some rough models that would allow us to recognize evolution, but I'm not aware of any similar models for conciousness.

      A couple billion humans may be able to perform the same calculations of conciousness on a large scale that your brain cells perform on a smaller scale... this is not necessarily incompatible with your claim that we are reverting to pack instincts: the struggle b/t individualism and group instincts might be characteristic of intelligent systems. (In humans at least, it seems that different inference sub-systems can produce conflicting intuitions [especially emotional ones] that violently clash, resulting in confusion, stress, and mental dissonance.)

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    6. Re:Distraction by hawkfish · · Score: 1
      I see intelligence (and sentience/conciousness) as a form of computation
      This is the "Strong AI Hypothesis". For a list of objections to this hypothesis and an extensive online seminar on a (scientific) alternative, have a look here
      (summary at the bottom).
      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  33. Slashdotted... by greg987123 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Sounds like a fun, harmless, and Constitutionally-protected way of blowing off a little steam."
    Looks like this site wasn't constitutionally protected from Slashdot. ;)

  34. Slashdotting = Flash mob on the web by SIGPrez · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems like a real life representation of a slashdotting.

    Does the first one there yell 'FP!' ?

    1. Re:Slashdotting = Flash mob on the web by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Boy, would I hate to see the trolls who post links to goatse.cx....

  35. New Category Suggestion: TFH by simetra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tin Foil Hat

    This would be for these types of stories that get the paranoid wackos to remind us of how our rights are gone, the government is after us, etc.

    Or at least store these on tfh.slashdot.org

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:New Category Suggestion: TFH by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Or at least store these on tfh.slashdot.org

      You can do this yourself by adding the following line to your /etc/hosts file:

      66.35.250.151 tfh.slashdot.org

  36. Critical Mass by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All over the world, there's been a movement called Critical Mass that gets folks together to take over the streets on bike rides on a semi-regular basis. Here in Chicago, it's been really successful -- hundreds go on the main ride every month, even in the dead of winter. In the summer months, there have been around a thousand riders. Critical Mass is a sort of anarchic protest against the domination of our streets by cars but without a specific, directed agenda. The idea is that having fun and taking over streets, no matter what one's political orientation is, is a good way to make a statement. What's interesting is that now that almost everybody has some direct connection to the Net, Critical Mass rides are getting organized overnight. When the war in Iraq broke out, the next day a group of Critical Massers against the war (not all CM folks are) organized a very effective ride within a half a day and people have been now talking about organizing within a few hours. I have to wonder about flash crowds becoming flash protests or flash rides and what the potential benefits and problems of this will be. Speaking of which, this effect also happened in the South Korean election recently in a close race.

    --
    Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    1. Re:Critical Mass by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *begin rant mode in 3...2...1...*
      AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
      Fun my ass! You obviously have never tried to get thru a city during CM. The idea's not having fun, it's taking a mob mentality in thinking it's ok to disrupt everybody's life because you're pissed at the world.

      I've always been one for peaceful demonstration and whatnot, but Critical Mass has always been a HUGE peeve of mine. What (and nobody I've asked has been able to answer this) is it supposed to accomplish??? Change? Well, it doesn't make me want to leave my car at home. It does, however, make me want to run down the next cyclist I see. Awareness? I know they say any publicity is good publicity, but pissing off the city isn't the way to gain support for a cause...

      I might even agree with your cause. But the only thing making me late for work is gonna do is make me vote against whatever it is you're trying to accomplish.

      Truth is, I've always thought of CM events as collective hissy fits. Just kicking and screaming and basically being annoying as hell.

      If you want to bitch, fine, but direct it at someone who gives a damn and can do something about it. But don't fuck with the roads and interfere with all of us who are just trying to live our lives in peace and do our friggin jobs.

      *sigh* It's so goddamn childish...

    2. Re:Critical Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      try riding a pushbike for a while.

      You'll discover exactly how innattentive, childish and selfish the average motorist is.

      As a city pushbike rider of long standing I can tell you, its the *pointless risks* car drivers take with your life, that really frustrate and annoy. And they happen every day, on every ride. Except for CM day!

      You can put up with a little delay every now and then whilst we train more drivers to remember who we are. Lets face it, we put up with a mountain of crap from you lot...

    3. Re:Critical Mass by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >mob mentality thinking it's ok to disrupt everybody's life because you're pissed at the world.

      Mob mentality also involves assuming that everyone (who matters) thinks like you. CM rides disrupt drivers because they are pissed off at drivers. Drivers - as CM rides so very clearly show - aren't the whole world.

      You're right that it serves no purpose and that it's inefficient. So, when did we become robots? Go back to Soviet Russia, comrade, your groupthink will be very welcome there. M'yeah.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Critical Mass by thanuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > The idea is that having fun and taking over streets, no matter what one's political orientation is, is a good way to make a statement

      Make a statement about what? That you don't care about inconveniencing others and you've time on your hands?

    5. Re:Critical Mass by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1
      Make a statement about what? That you don't care about inconveniencing others and you've time on your hands?

      A statement about our society's ridiculous reliance on cars, particularly in the city where bicycles are a much faster, healthier form of transportation.

      It's important to remember that the people who get pissed off at Critical Mass tend to be: a) white, b) in affluent neighborhoods. In downtown Chicago, traffic is so slow that it doesn't make a difference. In poor neighborhoods and hispanic, Asian, and black neighborhoods, people come out a cheer for Critical Mass or join in and Critical Massers stop and chat with folks.

      By and large, the only people who are being inconvenienced are angry, rich, impatient people.

      Anyway, CM never ever spends more than a quarter mile or so on any given street precisely so that cars can continue on their way and the riders in Chicago always tell people "thank you for waiting," and things like that.

      People who think that this is a big disruption should need to reconsider their priorities and values, I think.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    6. Re:Critical Mass by thanuk · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you think annoying angry, rich, impatient people is and end in itself. It certainly doesn't sound like a strategy for persuading people to cycle.

    7. Re:Critical Mass by Spunk · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree with you more, buddy.

      I respect that bikers need a place to ride and share the road when I see one. But asinine stunts like this will ONLY serve to piss people off. How dumb can these Critical Mass people be? If I got caught behind one I would never support a bike-related initiative again.

    8. Re:Critical Mass by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1
      It sounds like you think annoying angry, rich, impatient people is and end in itself. It certainly doesn't sound like a strategy for persuading people to cycle.

      I do think that annoying angry, rich, impatient people is an end in itself, and does help persuade un-angry, un-rich, and patient people to cycle, even if it doesn't persuade the yuppies.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    9. Re:Critical Mass by thanuk · · Score: 1

      > I do think that annoying angry, rich, impatient people is an end in itself So why all that nonsense about cycling and how polite you all are. Why not just be honest and say you like blocking streets because it annoys the rich?

    10. Re:Critical Mass by thanuk · · Score: 1

      > I do think that annoying angry, rich, impatient people is an end in itself

      So why all that nonsense about cycling and how polite you all are. Why not just be honest and say you like blocking streets because it annoys the rich?

    11. Re:Critical Mass by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      let me guess, you're one of those assholes that ride 3 inches off my bumber weaving about when I'm only going 20 over in the fast lane around traffic.

      I just got a junker car for winter..... I'm gonna give your kind a nice present next time... like break lights do ya????

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Critical Mass by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Yes, let me inform you about how "fun" one of these Critical Mass thingies was. It was the one on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. I'm sure many people know what happened. Bunch of morons completely blocked up one of the busiest highways in the city.

      Well, just so happens my 12 yr old brother was supposed to go in to surgery, and I could not make it to the hospital in time to see him beforehand. Luckily everything went ok, but had something gone wrong, I would never have gotten to see him.

      Just because you feel like making a statement does not mean you can interfere in the lives of others. The people that were 'protesting' almost got to see me 'protest' their actions by running them the fuck over.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:Critical Mass by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course, I and every single one of my friends who bikes on a regular basis has had to go to the hospital because they've been hit by a car and the driver was at fault. I was hit, rolled up the hood, smashed into the windshield, and was thrown to the pavement when someone ran a red light and wound up spending the morning in the ER. Another time, my feet were run over when a car intentionally pinned me in. My girlfriend almost got killed by a van which tried to run her off the road. Another friend was knocked unconscious by someone who threw their door open without looking.

      Recently, the city settled out of court in a lawsuit where an elderly black man (in his 60s) without drugs, weapons, or any malicious intent was intentionally hit by a police car while riding his bike.

      One of the protest aspects of Critical Mass is to protest the interference of cars in the lives of cyclists when the law states that cars and bicycles must share the road. A statement is needed precisely because drivers are so careless and malicious towards cyclists.

      As a sidenote, every time Critical Mass has taken over Lake Shore, the bikes are slowed down by the cars. Traffic around downtown Chicago at rush hour is so slow that bikes have a greater average speed. I'd guess that the amount of time that you lost was minimal.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    14. Re:Critical Mass by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Oh, you mean the gainfully employed people who have jobs and families that they are stuck commuting between? Do you really think they LIKE the fact that they have to commute from the burbs every day? Maybe that's why they get _angry_ when you blockade them with your bikes. Face it bub, you are the angry, jealous one here.


      I support the rights of bikers, and I am not defending the terribly inconsiderate way people drive in many cities (I'm speaking mostly of Boston and New York here, since that's where I've lived), but it effects pedestrians just as much as it effects bikers. I think the real problem is the people who want to go out and make a big scene and piss people off because it serves their rather infantile concept of social change by mob demand rather than rational discussion or argumentation. In other words, you are a whiny fucking communist, and you might want to reconsider your broken, disproven world view before you go out and piss somebody off so much that they break your fucking neck, which would be a crying shame indeed. Remember, children, you can't push for social change when you are dead.

    15. Re:Critical Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1: driving is a privilege.
      2: however abstract your claim to want to kill people for slowing you down is, I don't think that's a sensible argument. Voting against your beliefs because more-deeply-committed adherents inconvenienced you... that's self-destructive.
      3: walking, biking, etc. are rights.
      4: when your rights are routinely ignored in favor of big, fast, lethal and underutilized (1 person per SUV?!) cars, it's time for a good, old-fashioned sit-down strike that reminds people that all those advantages (big, fast, safe-for-me, comfortable, convenient) can be stripped away in a moment.
      5: take a close look at the next footage you see of cities in china, malaysia, etc. Hmm... lots of bikes. Ever wondered how it must feel to live with 365 days a year of CM-esque complications? Ever wondered if we could end up like that, with another few decades of globalization?
      6: I know of three people whose lives were suddenly and deeply changed by some dumbass ignoring them while on a bike. I know another couple motorcyclists similarly injured. Resenting being late is lame compared to the alternative...

      Where I live, there is no Critical Mass. But in winters, sidewalks become the highway's dumping ground for road slush until they're unusable. Crossing a bridge without a car is impossible for an agile adult male, let alone someone less agile. God help anyone who literally can't afford a car or has to wait until the next paycheck to fix their ride to work. Sitting by while RIGHTS are put on hold in favor of a majority that can afford to drive... that's enough for me to agree with CM. Incidentally, I can afford to buy my way out of this bind. I just hate having to drive when 10 minutes on a bike could get me to work.

      Ironically, 'to just live in peace and do my job' is why I recently wrote in a /. comment that I feel no need to get brought up on RIAA charges just to prove my piracy is an act of civil disobedience. How do I reconcile the contradiction? By accepting the delays that come with others' protests as my contribution. In return, I keep my anonymity.

      I do think the founding fathers understood that public speech might cause disruptions in our preplanned lives. That is the nature of protest: to get the attention of a bystander, to compell them to think about your plight. Resenting someone for making you late is shooting the messenger. If you really feel that way, would you feel that way if it was something vitally important to you that was slowing people down?

      --advaitavedanta

    16. Re:Critical Mass by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Maybe he'd care more for them if they didn't set up communities so that they could rape the cities' wealth and culture while payed all their taxes to their suburb.

    17. Re:Critical Mass by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > Fun my ass! You obviously have never tried to get thru a
      > city during CM.

      I've lived (and commuted) in San Francisco (which has a HUGE Critical Mass) for over three years now. And not once has Critical Mass ever slowed me down.

      See... this is the *CITY*... we have BART and MUNI to get from point A to point B. You know... those TRAINS that run UNDER the streets, where no amount of car/bike/pedestrian traffic can slow you down? And on the rare handful of occasions that I HAVE driven to work, finding and paying for parking has been much more of a hassle than Critical Mass would be.

      And hell... even if you are so obstinate and arrogant that you believe you just HAVE to yacht around in the city in your ford executioner; it's not like Critical Mass is really so spontaneous as the parent claims anyway. The times and routes are planned and known in advance. So you can plan around them.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    18. Re:Critical Mass by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Do you decide your position on all issues based on if it has inconvenienced you?

    19. Re:Critical Mass by Agthorr · · Score: 1
      If you want to bitch, fine, but direct it at someone who gives a damn and can do something about it. But don't fuck with the roads and interfere with all of us who are just trying to live our lives in peace and do our friggin jobs.

      You are *exactly* the sort of person who could do something about it. You choose not to. It's not their fault if you don't give a damn.

    20. Re:Critical Mass by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean the gainfully employed people who have jobs and families that they are stuck commuting between

      Of course this has the disgusting implication that all the minorities cheering for CM are, of course, unemployed (and probably on welfare too, huh?)

      it serves their rather infantile concept of social change by mob demand rather than rational discussion or argumentation.

      Yeah that helped in the South in the 60s, didn't it? Shit, what were all those niggers doing sitting in the front of the bus trying to enact that whiny communist social change.

      Remember, children, you can't push for social change when you are dead.

      Yeah no one knows who Martin Luther King, Jr. or Mahatma Ghandi or even James Davis are (well true, that last one is a little too local). Not to mention that your wish of death upon people who speak out is purely facist.

    21. Re:Critical Mass by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      I don't think I ever said I wish death on anybody. I have no problem with people having their own opinions and trying to enact change to improve the world - I think it's your responsibility as a citizen to do so. However, when you interfere with my ability to earn a living, and my responsbility to support myself and my family, or just generally annoy me because it makes you feel good about yourself to annoy "rich, white people", then I won't shed too many tears if somebody happens to come along and wring your neck.


      As to your other points, 1) I never said anything about minorities. I don't think minorities who get stuck in traffic jams caused by socialists on bikes feel any better about it than white people do. I have no idea how this is a racial issue in any way, frankly, it's about my right to earn to a living and your lack of a right to interfere with my rights. 2) Black people sitting in the front of buses weren't trying to infringe on anybody else's rights to use the bus, they were trying to exercise their rights. In your example, others could clearly still ride the bus and sit where they wanted, as long as seats were available. Likewise, I have no problem with bikers exercising their rights to share the road, to use bike lanes, etc. Purposely creating traffic jams and blocking roads to prevent me from getting to and from work is quite different - it's more like black people rioting in the ghetto and looting stores. Sure, it may be an expression of their frustration, but it's still morally wrong because it impinges on the storeowners right to earn a living, and is morally unjustified. That's why rioters should be shot on sight (and rioters!=protestors, so stop calling me a fascist). 3) Those guys didn't push for social change when they were dead - they did it when they were alive. I also think it's rather demeaning to compare these freaks on bikes who take joy out of making my life more difficult and "annoying" me, to Martin Luther King, Jr. or Ghandi. Do you think King would ever have said that his goal was to "annoy rich white yuppies"?

    22. Re:Critical Mass by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Well a few points back at you.

      1. You have taken one person's view of CM (annoy rich white people) to be the whole point of CM. That isn't true.

      2. While it is true that you don't wish death upon anyone, saying that it wouldn't bother you if someone killed them is depraved indifference to human life. It's disgusting.

      3. You describe the traffic from CM to be something which ruins your life. Other accounts here dispute that (I can't say on it either way because I have not participated, as a biker or driver, in CM).

      4. Okay my sitting in the front of the bus analogy was a bit off. What about the civil rights marches and sit-ins that blocked streets and other public areas then? Morally unjustified?

      5. Rioters should be shot on sight? What happened to due process? Or even punishments that fit the crime? Again, I *will* call you a facist because you continue to talk like one.

      6. Okay you didn't say anything about minorities. The parent to your post did, and I made a little jump on that one.

      7. You called the grandparent a communist, and say in this post that the bikers are now socialists. The two ideas are completely different. Which is it?

    23. Re:Critical Mass by defaultXIX · · Score: 1

      Hah, you should try living in Paris. They protest everything, I mean everything. The unemployed go on strike, and win more money. How does that work? Does an unemployed person on strike goto work?

    24. Re:Critical Mass by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I felt that I should post here, since I've actually taken part in a critical mass gathering. It was in a small town, and there were about 10 to 20 participants each time.

      In no way, shape or form were we 'disrupting everyboy's life', as you put it. We rode downtown, then through some residential neighbords. Each time, we took care to stay in one lane, and obey the rules of traffic.

      In fact, I'd say that it made me more respectful of the traffic laws. Most of them are there for your safety, and people often ignore them because they think that having a few thousand pounds of steel around them makes it okay. Take that away, and you suddenly become mindful of how dangerous traffic can be - try riding a bike in the street sometime, you'll start being very careful. It taught me to be much more aware of the traffic around me. We even did the hand signals for turns, which most cyclists don't do. Taking part in a critical mass event is something everyone who drives or bikes should do - it makes you a much more careful driver and cyclist, and instills respect for others on the road.

    25. Re:Critical Mass by dbretton · · Score: 1

      I'll share the goddamn road when bicyclists have to pay registration, excise tax, insurance, put a license plate on their bicycles and have to obey every traffic law without exception.

      Until then, get the hell off MY ROAD!

  37. Not only is it slashdotted.... by atrader42 · · Score: 1

    It's farked!

  38. Re:Another name for it... Soylent SPAM by pergamon · · Score: 1

    It's PEOPLE!

  39. One answer by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why? What's the point?

    Because it's there. Jeez, pay attention!

  40. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Electronic sheep?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      Androids?

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
  41. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by Eminor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This country is totally going down the crapper, when there's all this ridiculous, unfair, unjust stuff going on and people are organizing these pointless stand ins.

    Think of it as a testing ground for more smart spontaneous protests.

    Will anyone organise a flash mob to boo an RIAA lawyer?

  42. And... by Squidgee · · Score: 2, Funny
    And the "flash mob" that is /. brings down Cheese Bikini.

    I'll have pictures up shortly.

  43. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by LS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Moderators, how is this insightful?

    First, these do not appear to be protests, so it's comparing apples to oranges.

    Second, if you follow this logic, then you might as well stop going to bars, movies, singing, playing music, watching screensavers, and other "fruitless" endeavors until you've solved the world's problems.

    This poster probably also derides liquid nitrogen cooled pentiums and potato guns and every other "worthless" geek project posted to slashdot.

    I think you need to realize that there really IS no point.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  44. A semi-related topic by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you're ever at a concert or any event like that, get like ten people you know to start doing something that makes noise (applauding, chanting something, whatever). It will spread infectiously in a matter of seconds. This works in just general crowds sometimes too but at a concert or similar event it's almost ensured.

    I know this because I discovered it by accident once. For no particular reason I began clapping abnormally loud and in a pattern, long after people had stopped applauding. A group of my friends joined in as a joke and within say 20 seconds the whole room of people was clapping along. We tested this a couple other places as well.

    1. Re:A semi-related topic by Ack_OZ · · Score: 1

      there was research in a similar vein done about the mexican wave...

      http://www.tu-dresden.de/vkiwv/vwista/bbc2/

    2. Re:A semi-related topic by Ack_OZ · · Score: 1

      ermm... clickable...


      http://www.tu-dresden.de/vkiwv/vwista/bbc2/

    3. Re:A semi-related topic by Bearpaw · · Score: 1
      I've initiated mass-mooing and mass-howling.

      Mass-mooing can work well in situations where a group of people are being "herded" around. Not everyone will join in, of course, but enough will to get a laugh.

      If there are a lot of people really wound up and excited (and maybe a little drunk), that may be a good time for a mass-howl. I started a mass-howl at a First Night (public New Year's Eve celebration) in Boston a few years ago. The echoing of howls off of office buildings was pretty cool.

    4. Re:A semi-related topic by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This ties in to something that still makes me laugh when I think about it.

      Me, my brother and a friend were in the tiny Liberty Theater in Seward, Alaska, to watch some Star Trek movie in the early 90s. We got there kind of late, and the theater was packed, so we had to sit down in the front, in the second row I think.

      There was a furious windstorm outside, and while we were waiting for the movie to start the power went out. Emergency lights came on, but it was still nearly pitch dark.

      So sitting there in near total darkness in the tiny but crowded theater, everyone murmuring and squirming and eating popcorn, my brother starts to whistle the theme from Star Trek. I joined in, and pretty soon this entire theater was whistling together, although by then it was kind of hard to whistle since we were all laughing so hard. It was one of the funniest damn things I've ever seen.

    5. Re:A semi-related topic by clambake · · Score: 3, Funny

      Indeed, it does work. A group of myself and five friend once were able to generate and sustain a continuous "wave" at an Astros game for over an hour simply by never "petering out". Sometimes the wave would die out and only we were left, but eventually, after we started standing up at regular intervals and doing a tiny 5-person wave, the wave would start up again. It went like this on and off probably more than 100 times.

    6. Re:A semi-related topic by Trollificus · · Score: 1
      I used to do the howl when I would walk by the special ed room back in highschool. Next thing you know, everyone in the room was going nuts while the poor special ed teachers were frantically trying to get them to stay quiet.
      The computer lab was across the hall, so on one side, you have a lot of howling and on the other a lot of laughing.

      I miss highschool sometimes. ^_^

      --

      "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
      - Gov. Jesse Ventura

    7. Re:A semi-related topic by _Laban_ · · Score: 1

      I've participated in mass howlings a couple of times while being drunk at the Roskilde Festival in Denmark. The festival has around 100000 visitors so it's quite an experience when you hear the howl starting up on the other side of the huge camping area and it comes rolling towards you. Haven't been any really good ones since '98-'00 though, not that I've have experienced anyways.

    8. Re:A semi-related topic by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's true, there was this one time that me and my buddies Dick, John, Colin and Paul decided to invade Iraq, and before we knew it, 140,000 other people were joining in. Man, we laughed about that.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:A semi-related topic by juanfe · · Score: 1

      Something like this became a tradition in Washington DC. Every year, AOLTimeWarnerHBOSmithklineBeechamConagra sponsors a showing of a free vintage movie on the National Mall.

      A few years ago, as the pre-movie HBO trailer rolled on (the camera pan over a model town swiniging up to the stars swirling to make the HBO logo), someone decided that the earnest 1980s you-can-do-it music deserved some attention, and jumped up and started dancing to it as if he were a marionette being handled by someone with a bad case of Tourette's. Of the thousands gathered to see this film, some were bound to join. It kind of became a thing that was done during that year's series.

      The following year, it started happening again, with more people jumping up and dancing like spastic marionettes. And the year after. This week, i would guess that about 1/3 of the people there pounced up at the chance to rejoice in the corporate theme song.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    10. Re:A semi-related topic by apecoraro · · Score: 1

      thats the funniest shit i have heard in a while.

  45. I'm organising an flash mob in Ireland by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

    This will be great, we'll all head to a public house at around 7:00 on Friday, drink beer like we can handle it, then spontaineously all leave at once when closing time is called.

    Who's interested?

  46. The first Italian Flash Mob? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    The First Italian Flash Mob

    What, do two guys show up and try and sell you "protection" and then disappear suddenly?

  47. Re:Oh great. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    In retaliation, several flash mobs will coverge on the Slashdot offices. (They have offices right?)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  48. I was at the Otto Tootsi Plohound one. by Hechz · · Score: 1

    It was an incredible way to just have amass bit of fun. The best part of it was there was no reason that it needed to be hard, it was social fluff.

  49. See also: by Valar · · Score: 1

    Also see: slash crowd-- the physical manifestation of the slashdot effect.

  50. /. effect by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like the SlashDot effect being demonstrated IRL.

  51. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 1

    Now that I'd like to see. Use your flash mob powers for good, people....

  52. Sounds like fun by Paladin144 · · Score: 1
    I get into this "Freak out the squares!" type of stuff. As a lowly unemployed student, this sounds like the type of thrilling activity upon which my precious hours of freetime would be well spent.

    I've signed up for the Minneapolis Mob since I've got nothing better to do. I find this sort of social interaction fascinating. Plus, one day it could be extremely useful. I also think that if we neglect to exercise our rights (i.e. freedom of assembly) we will lose them to atrophy.

  53. Re:Party at SCO's and RIAA associations home tonig by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Funny

    BYOB! Is that Bring Your Own Bash_shell, or Bring Your Own Bandwidth?

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  54. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by imnoteddy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Do they have nothing going on in their lives that they'd get together with a bunch of random strangers and do nothing?

    They're having fun. They'll laugh a lot the rest of the day. They'll tell a whole lot of people about it. That's not doing nothing. Works for me.

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
  55. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 1

    I just think right now, we're living in a really pivotal time. There's a lot of turmoil going on and things very well will get worse before they get better unless people get off their bums and wake up to the stuff that's going down. People these days just seem so uninterested in politics, apathetic about their fate, obvlivious to the fact corporations are reaming us up the ass on a daily basis.

    The ability to organize over the web spontaneously is a great, great thing. Maybe these folks can think of some ways this activity can be used to improve things. That's all I wonder about.

    After the economy turns around, everyone can go back to bar hopping, song singing and screen saver watching ... okay ... ?

  56. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by spudchucker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Flash Mobs work because of people like you.

  57. They're just ripping off Bruce Sterling. by kwashiorkor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Read Distraction.

    --
    -- kwashiorkor --
    Leaps in Logic
    should not be confused with
    Jumping to Conclusions.
  58. eeeeeevil by clambake · · Score: 1

    Seems to me, and this is just because I am evil, but this could be used as a very powerful tool by the less than noble to do very creativly bad things. And the participants may not necessarily know they are participating in the evil.

    You could put people into dangerous situations, influence politicians, perhaps clog up vital areas at just the right time to cause serious harm.

    Not that I dislike these things, I think they are awesome... but like I said, evil is great! I'm off to think of fun ways to put flash mobs on Rumsfeld's mind. :)

  59. it will be an interesting move.... by Comsn · · Score: 1

    for one to organize two flash mobs, or a group of flash mobs, and have them come together, and bug each other.

    or mix flash mobs, cops and robbers!@ cowboys and indians. recreate the alamo battle!

    bwahahahaa...

  60. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by LS · · Score: 1

    Maybe if everyone subscribes to what you define as the world being screwed up. I think the economy has been screwed up since there was such a thing. In fact, the state of the world is pretty fucked up, and it most likely will be like that until the last person dies. I, for one, do not plan to sit huddled in a corner waiting for the end, or out carrying a sign saying "the end is nigh!"

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  61. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by tansey · · Score: 1

    The whole point is that they ARE strangers. Do you really think that if there were some debatable issue that they were protesting, that these people would be able to gather this way?

    Protests take centralization and common views. When you see them, they're normally not consisting of people who had a few hours to spare. I went to one in D.C. in November, and of the 10 people I met there, less than half were from the VA/MD area (most had flown in).

    So it's not that they don't believe in anything, it's that they believe in different things. Everybody enjoys a good laugh, but not everyone is serious in the same way about what needs to change (the one exception, of course, is that the Matrix 2 sucked and everyone agrees).

  62. Flash mods for Flash mobs? by axxackall · · Score: 1

    Does Flash mob has Flash moderators? And how about meta-moderators? How do they get karma? Is there any weekly Flashback review?

    --

    Less is more !
  63. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by mnmn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rememeber youre in slashdot. This is where people built beowulf PDAs and emulated a PC in a PC which ran an emulator which ran a PC. Its all because we can, and just because. Its that feeling of control over things and exercising it with no purpose which makes it all interesting and geeklike. Protesting something is just too usual.

    Also note people would have different agendas.. geeks with differing nationalities etc, but a flash crowd gathers these various people with absolutely nothing in common except for the unreasonable excitement about creating a flash crowd. Try it. Youll never go back to protesting.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  64. Chill by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution."
    --Famous misquote of Emma Goldman

    Sometimes, people just want to have fun. Fear not; some people have already figured out that organized coincidences can be effective protests. See: Critical Mass bike rides. More will figure this out over time. Right now, just enjoy it!

    Side note: The story behind the quote is here.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  65. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

    There is a difference between protesting for a cause and being humourous.

    If I learned of such an event in Calgary and I was able to attend, I would make every effort to go. Being able to tell friends that 600 people walked single file through a McDonald's in Walmart without buying anything would be golden.

  66. Re:Party at SCO's and RIAA associations home tonig by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1


    Bazooka.

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  67. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 1

    It seems to me, apathetic people like you are a dime a dozen. I'm hardly saying the world is ending. Maybe you're just too young to remember how much better things were going only a decade ago, or maybe you're just too old and jaded to give a hoot anymore. Either way, I'm sure if you look at recent polls, there's a great number of people who think this country is going in the wrong direction, be it the economy, who's in office ... otherwise why the hell is the governor of california getting his hat handed to him? It just shocks me to think people just don't give a crap anymore, to the point they don't even see any point in doing anything.

    You seem to think I'm a pessimist, wondering why people aren't more active, when I think your view of life is even more fatalistic. Basically, the world is screwed up, it always will be, why bother doing anything with any purpose or conviction?

    I repeat, argh.

  68. Other interesting possibilities by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Its cool to not be allowed to talk with the public. What about everyone staring straight up in the sky and acting shocked.. making everyone around stare up. How about great dismay and sorrow... people with sad expressions and shaking heads like theyve heard something really wrong. That will make people find the closest news source.

    And what about anonymously selecting a target and following him/her like a celebrity. Spooky.

    How about everyone tired and looking for places to sleep in a place where its not allowed to sleep, say a fastfood place.

    OK.. couldnt resist. How about EVERYONE entering a target indoor location, letting out a big one (biological gases) and leave. The place should not have any lit flames or smokers around, geeks are valuable.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:Other interesting possibilities by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about meta flash-mobbing? As in you have a flash mob group who watches a different flash mob site to figure out what they're up to, get there at the same time, and do something else, possibly related in some way to the "official" behavior.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Other interesting possibilities by mnmn · · Score: 1

      They say the answers are scripted. Like say someone asks whats going on, they say I dont know. Now the second mob will have the task of constantly asking whats going on repetitively. In all the hubub someone should walk in with a video camera. Will be funny. I wonder if there are such groups in Toronto... I wanna flash!

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    3. Re:Other interesting possibilities by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Of course you know what this ends up being, don't you? Team trolling!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  69. It's like.... by eluusive · · Score: 1

    Real life slashdotting! Wow! We just flash mobbed their website!

  70. Staring at the sky by neile · · Score: 1

    I participated in one of these about a year ago before (I didn't realise it was called a flash mob until today). About 50 people just showed up at Pike Place Market and started at the edge of a building in the sky. We stood there for about 30 minutes, then just walked away. If anyone asked what we were doing, we just said "shhhhhhhhhh" and went back to staring.

    Goofy, but fun in an odd way. Go figure.

  71. Re:Chalk another one up for the slashdotted list.. by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Aye... 'Tis true, 'tis true

  72. The real process for constitutional protection. by sglider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Fill out a 'right to peaceably assemble' permit, specifying the date, time, number of people expected, and reason for assembling. 2. Request where you'd like to peaceably assemble, keeping in mind that your local goverment may move you on a whim (Democratic National Convention, 2000). 3. Bribe 50 or so local officers so that you are not arrested for 'obstructing a sidewalk' (a la the protesters in NYC against the War in Iraq). 4. Finally, do not allow anyone to shout during said demonstration, otherwise police in riot gear that were 'hanging around' may find a reason to bust up your assembly.

    --
    War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
  73. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by LS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My view of life is not fatalistic. I still believe that individuals have the potential to excel and find peace, but the world as a whole will always be screwed up, simply because of probability. There will always be screwed up people in the world doing screwed up things.

    You're view is fatalistic. There is no way out with your mindset.

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. monty python or star trek by Comsn · · Score: 1

    there could be a flash mob of 100 people, all with coconut shells spouting off monty python quotes.

    or 100 people recreating the death of KAAAAHN.

    i've got a million ideas for anything. just hope no-one can geek this idea up a notch.

    1. Re:monty python or star trek by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      What about everyone doing Silly Walks!

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    2. Re:monty python or star trek by louabill · · Score: 1

      Too dangerous. Imagine all the folks trying to look like John Cleese w/o the coordination, alternating between kicking the grandma next to them and falling on the ground and being trampled. It would be pretty funny until the first decapitation, tho.

  76. This is not what you think it is... by gonzo_bozo · · Score: 1

    Although this looks like a social event, it is actually just a pretty individualistic form of entertainment. Other people are just props in the event. I think it is more related to masturbation than it is to mass protests.

  77. Bruce Sterling used this idea.... by HBK-4G · · Score: 1

    ...in one of his novels, Distraction if I remember correctly. Something about how spontaneous mobs were robbing banks or the like. A good read for sci-fi fans with a down-to-earth mindset.

  78. Man, you must be a blast at parties by Paladin144 · · Score: 1
    Haven't you ever heard of "art?" Not that dude, Art Garfunkel, but the process of expressing yourself creatively?

    I, for one, think this is a brilliant idea, and is much better than sitting around on your computer, bitching to "a bunch of random strangers" about something which has no point, and is not supposed to have a point. It's fun! Perhaps you've heard of it?

    While I'll grant that this country has a shitload of problems, including a ton you didn't mention, one of the root causes of our general malaise is (wait for it)... isolation.

    Now, I know I'm preaching to the choir on this one. Let's face it, we /.'ers spend much of our day hunched over a computer, which we then use to "converse" with "random strangers" about the fact that our computer is A. not fast enough or B. not slow, like in the good ol' days.

    It's been remarked that big cities are among the loneliest places on earth. It seems counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you take into account the cultural barriers that have somehow been erected over the centuries. If you want to make the world a better place, make some more friends. Those friends will lead to new friends, and so on.

    Personally, I'll try anything once, and if flashmobs are a step towards a more spontaneous and less rigidly-controlled future, then I'm all for 'em. Nowadays, you can get arrested for looking "suspicious" in a public place. Weirdness is under attack. And I am a weirdo. There's no doubt about it, and I rejoice in gathering together with my fellow freaks. That's just one reason why I love Wookie Foot.

    My advice to you? Free your mind from cynicism and isolation. It helps no one, least of all yourself. Not to say I've got life all figured out, but I know one thing; having fun and expressing yourself is .... well.... it just is.

  79. I heard about this a while ago... by mlk · · Score: 1

    And I now really want to get a group of people to do a mass star-wars sword fight in Liverpool Str.

    Anyone intrested? :)

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  80. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    (the one exception, of course, is that the Matrix 2 sucked and everyone agrees).

    You're kidding, right?

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  81. Art? Lunacy? or Something Else? by ShallowThroat · · Score: 1

    I guess you could look at this in a few different ways. Maybe it is just a bunch of bored people without any other way, or brain power to think of a way, to spend their time. Or maybe it's art. But if it's art, its nothing compared to Spencer Tunick. Or maybe...it's just something completely new and different and radical. personally i think its bullshit. :P -ST

    --
    The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
  82. Fark vs Slashdot by August_zero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to see something interesting...

    I have scanned through the responses to this subject here on slashdot, and while there are some that have been very negative, the overall vibe I get is positive. (or nuetral)

    Now, go over to FARK.com, and read through the comments that were posted after the article went up yesterday. A vast majority of them are negative, and not just negative in the "bah Im smarter than everyone else" mindset that most of the FARK message boards are built upon, but rather an honest to god "I am offended at how stupid people are that would do this sort of thing" kind of way.

    Not sure if its all that important or even on-topic but an interesting contrast of the two communities.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  83. All For It.... by MrEnigma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm all for it, but what happens if a group gets out of hand and starts thrasing property, wether it be in a store, or some public place.

    I guess I wouldn't want it to get out of hand, and maybe have something like that happen. Especially since there will be all kinds of people that know about it now (well, more than before anyhow), so you'll always attract a certain bad subset. Like slashdot in trolls, it's unavoidable.

    --
    GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
  84. best one I've seen so far... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    At an acting convention, all the actors went to a convenience store which sold candy by the pound, and each bought one jelly bean, skittle or m&m, walking separately through the checkout line. Cost 'em about 3c apiece, and confused the hell out of the cashier.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  85. Obligatory security note by LaForce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From article: Getting groups together is easier these days thanks to e-mail, Savage says, but that's only the start. Imagine how simple it will be to assemble a flash mob, he says, when cell phones and handheld computers are equipped with "location aware" technology that will emit a "ping" at the right moment and tell potential mobbers exactly where to go.

    Just replace "potential mobbers" with "police." 'nuff said. Not in my cell phone!

    But on topic, what these people are doing is seriously funny. If I lived in a major city that was doing those things it seems like it would be a great thing to do to ward off boredom and seriousness. Normally, I'm the kind of person who's paranoid about the cameras, under the fear that I'll do something that "looks" suspicious in my every day activities, and be questioned for no reason because of it. This seems like a good way to confuse the heck out of normal people, with pure surreal action.

    In a way, it reminds me of something we used to organize way back in school. Anyone else have a tradition where a large group of classmates would pick a keyphrase to wait for a lecturer to say, and then upon that word, everybody shifts weight, turns a page, or something of the like? Less organized than these 'mobs' but still a lot of fun, as immature as we were. I mean, are. Yeah...

  86. other names for them by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    At my university, PSU, and many others these exist to. But for some reason they are not called Flash Mobs, they are called riots. They also always taste like pepper spray.

    Did you know pepper spray comes in more then one flavor?

  87. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by toothfish · · Score: 1

    sometimes the point is that there is no point.

    activities which are ostensibly silly or nonsensical often have a protest value that can't be communicated via traditional means. whether the flash mob people have this in mind is anyone's guess, especially now that they've been (electronically) flash mobbed themselves, but i have to wonder.

    i, for one, would hate to be working in one of the retail shops that got flash mobbed, though-- poor saps.

  88. My idea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Crash Mobs. That's where a group of angry bystanders views a Flash Mob forming, and beats the living fuck out of each and every member. Problem solved.

  89. no, its existential vs. utilitaritan by js7a · · Score: 1
    Frankly, this is the most interesting thread I've found in this story. However, if you two are going to call each other names, make sure you choose the right names.

    LS is presenting a typical existential viewpoint, like that of Sartre.

    YllabianBitPipe has taken a utilitarian viewpoint, like that of J.S. Mill.

    The conflict between these two points of view is the same as in the prisoner's dilemma from game theory. The utilitarians want to attain the benefit of having everyone cooperating, so they encourage others to cooperate. The existentialists, believing the probability of cooperation succeding to be low enough to make it futile to some extent, but also unwilling to embrace defection -- because doing so would negate the essential humanity of action -- try to find sources of entertainment that the utilitarians call pointless, and delay the choice to cooperate or defect.

    The question becomes: even if, "the world as a whole will always be screwed up," then is there any point in trying to create local maxima of quality of life? The utiltarians aren't going to be so lucky all the time, but the existentialists might be capable of more than they give themselves credit for. The world does not have bright lines like a 2x2 game theory matrix. The best intentions often go astray, but on the other hand sometimes a tiny action by a single person can make a huge difference for the entire population.

    This debate goes on in my head every day. I like to call myself a libertarian, but some days I just can't make it out of bed.

  90. how is it constitutionally-protected? by mkbz · · Score: 1

    the right to peacably assemble applies only to public lands. a store is private property, not a park or sidewalk.

    your 'inalienable rights' do not extend so far as to trump the rights of the property owner. the constitution protects _everyone_ not just the group that holds up (small parts of it) as a shield.

  91. We do this in class... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    If the lesson or whatever is done and people are just working, me and my frinds will pick up our bags or whatever, stand up, then everyone else gets up to leave. Then we sit back down and watch the people leave and the teacher yelling at them that the bell hasn't rang yet. Fun with sheeple.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  92. s/libertarian/utilitaritan/ by js7a · · Score: 1
    I like to call myself a utilitarian, but some days I just can't make it out of bed.

    I don't like to call myself a libertarian. Libertarian's can't fugure out how to maintain ambulance services. (Objectivists can't either, in theory, but in my experience the most strident libertarian and objectivist will both suddenly become a moderate upon election or appointment to a position of influence.)

  93. Some other Sites with photos and info by spoco2 · · Score: 1
    Just so they too can be slashdotted:

    http://www.fredhoysted.com/
    http://www.satanslaundromat.com/
    and last, but not least:
    http://www.moistandtasty.com/

    Spread the Slashdotting around, that's what I say

  94. MOD UP, GOOD URL by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1


    This is a great url if you're looking for the boston area movement...

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bostoncitymob/

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  95. I think this could be useful by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

    Scene: You're at a restaurant talking to a client, or a potential employer. Suddenly, a crowd surrounds you. "Look, there he is!" they shout, and hoist you up on their shoulders, carring you about the room once or twice while singing "For He's A Jolly Good Fellow." Perhaps some of them could be holding signs and big pictures of you and whatnot. When you got back to your seat you could just blush and act all modest, like you didn't want to talk about it.

  96. For Fun and Profit by Remik · · Score: 1

    1. Organize Flash Mob in my area.
    2. ?????
    3. Profit!

    Oh, wait... #2. Rob a bank near by.

    -R

  97. It's all Dom Joly's fault! by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

    Blame Trigger Happy TV and Channel Four Entertainment!

  98. On a smaller scale by fven · · Score: 1

    This is fun to do with just a few friends. Walk into a store (either serially or parallel) and mime what you want.
    Or when standing at a set of pedestrian lights (the ones that have a green and a red man), imitate the lights exactly - meaning your arms and legs are constantly bent at a wierd angle.

    The only rules are not to talk and only laugh after you've walked away.

  99. Re:Oh great. by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

    No they make words song of cowboy neal and go to OSDN offices and start singing. The tune would right from the puppets show.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  100. Re:Chalk another one up for the slashdotted list.. by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

    it wasnt supposed to be 'witty'. it was supposed to be.. how shall i put it... "exaggeratedly descriptive"

    --


    Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
  101. Re:Two out of three... by magic · · Score: 1
    Nope... the government is allowed to curtail freedom of assembly, requiring a permit for large groups. The police could shut these down and arrest people if they decided they didn't want you flash mobbing in a specific location.


    -m

  102. July Jingle Bells by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mad Santa Crawl: "each year at christmastime a crowd of santas descends upon one of san francisco's most-touristed neighborhoods to get drunk, to hand out disturbing gifts, and to frighten tourists.

    You want to really freak people, dress like Santa's in July and sing carols. I had a college friend who used to get drunk on a hot May night and wonder around singing xmas carols. It was a hoot.

  103. There's a reason for that. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

    Optimists have flash-mobbed /.'s discussion!

  104. Looks like flashdot.org is... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

    ... Available!

    Dollars to doughnuts it isn't this time tomorrow. :)

    (And no, I'm not gonna register it.)

  105. ans: They are unemployed programmers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Thank W and visas.

  106. Flash mob plan for next November by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    I'm going to host one of these in November. Everyone will gather in a bar beforehand. Then I'll hand everybody a slip a paper that says, "Go and VOTE."

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
    1. Re:Flash mob plan for next November by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
      You sir, are sick. I like it, I like it. :)

      Personaly though, I think only people who care enough about politics to actualy know what's really going on should vote. I think people who vote just because someone told them they should are the most likly people to vote down party lines. But if you must put "Go and VOTE" on a peice of paper, you could at least say what canidate to vote for. (If it is some wacky independent it actualy might become a legitimate flash mob, sorta, although it wouldn't confuse people untill they see that on one day, at one location, canidate x, got more votes than he did in his previous three attempts at office. Just please, make sure it's someone you wouldn't mind if he got elected.

      On second thought, this is a very BAD idea, we don't want to tamper with the elections. It's already been done.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  107. Bruce Sterling? Larry Niven! by TheFrood · · Score: 1

    Try "The Last Days of the Permanent Floating Riot Club".

    TheFrood

    --
    If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
  108. So that would be... by Aropax20 · · Score: 1
    ...a "flashdotting"?

    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!

  109. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

    Everytime is a pivotal time. There is always turmoil going on. Things always get worse before they get better. People are always apathetic. Corporations have been reaming us up the ass since the East India Company (or whatever the first joint stock company was) was formed.

    The willingness to gather together for some inane fun is a great, great thing. Maybe these folks can think of some ways all of this activity can be used to bring some silliness into the world. That's all I wonder about.

    After the economy turns around, everyone can go back to saving the world... okay...?

  110. flash mob today @ vienna, austria by benson+hedges · · Score: 1

    announcing europe's second flash mob, today in vienna, austria. meeting point is the tramway/bus-station "Volkstheater", next to the Palais Epstein, at 15:00 local time. yeah, I know, this should go on more flashmob-related pages, but you meddering kids /.ed all of them :(

    --
    Karma : Soylent Green (Mostly due to eating junk food and mocking religion)
  111. Let's put a mob to good use by el_flynn · · Score: 1

    mayhaps someone wants to organize an online version of this, whereby people would converge in one chatroom or something like that, and randomly select one source of spam, and everyone sends a bunch of emails to that spamsource.

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
  112. flash mobbing by mandalayx · · Score: 1

    alright guys, flash mob at Natalie Portman's house, at 11PM!

    And you thought one person stalking you was bad...

    *****

    Seriously, I think it sounds the stuff in the article is a cool idea.

  113. Flash Mob Startles Airport Security Workers by serutan · · Score: 1

    Hilarity ensues.

  114. Sorry, I don't like it. by Wirr · · Score: 1

    Always remember - the IQ of a mob is the IQ of the most stupid member divided by the number of participants.
    Hence its only a matter of time until such a 'fun' event goes wrong.

  115. That's okay, I do! by Vladimus · · Score: 1

    And remember - it's always funny until someone gets hurt.
    Then it's hilarious.

    --

    A rolling stone is worth two in the bush!

  116. /. Surrealism? by Omestes · · Score: 1

    Looking at the last two articles on /.'s home, I'm scared. /. is devolving into an art journal, poems have sex, and street theature. Hmm.... SCO isn't suing anyone new, right? No new RIAA conflicts? Lets cover ART!

    Though I personally dig this in a Discordian kind of way, very op mindf*ck.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  117. Re:Party at SCO's and RIAA associations home tonig by ptarjan · · Score: 1

    No! BYOC
    Obviously you haven't been to enought LAN parties

  118. Same in the UK by p.gogarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Feel sorry for us UK residence it is now law that a gathering of over 7 people in a public place can be classed as a riot is it doesn't dispures when asked.

    That is just having a group larger than 7 people (unless obvoiusly you have a permit to hold a public demonstration).

    Yay to no constitution and the criminal justice bill in Britian.

    --
    Paul Gogarty
    1. Re:Same in the UK by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Is that really a consequence of that act. I can't remember it in full.

      I was a hunt sab for quite a while before the CJB and I remember a riot being defined as :

      12 people with a common violent purpose.

      Less than twelve and it would be affray.

      It used to be that a local JP had to be roused and he had to literally "read the riot act" to the crowd, and then the local soldiers could attack them on horseback with swords.

      When 20+ per side people are brawling in the street/fields for their politics it gets pretty darn crazy I can tell ya.

      Being chased by mounted police through a town centre is a buzz as well (we ran into a shopping mall to escape 8)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Same in the UK by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In Great Britain the Constitution is the whole body of public law, customary as well as statutory, which is continually being modified by custom, judgement in the courts as well as by the elected representatives of the country.

      The British Constitution developed from the Magna Carta and whilst it is not written down in one place, it is considered to be a strong constitution.

      Just because the UK version isn't all in one place doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because the US one is all down in one place, it doesn't mean the US government will uphold all of it if it things it can get away with ignoring bits it finds inconvenient.

    3. Re:Same in the UK by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Great post Paul!

      You just got added to 213917 different spam maillists by posting your email address! I hope you have enough diskspace to handle the junk.
      May I suggest installing Spamassassin before its' too late?

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  119. In the UK by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

    In the UK, this sort of thing could be nipped in the bud if the authorities got wind of the plans in advance:

    under Clause 65, a chief police officer would be able, for the first time, to apply to the local council (and with the consent of the Home Secretary) to prohibit the holding of all trespassory assemblies he or she thinks are likely to take place for up to four days and within a radius of 5 miles from a specified centre. Trespassory assemblies are defined here as open air assemblies of 20 or more people which may result in "serious disruption to the life of the community" or which may damage a building or monument of historical, architectural, scientific or archaeological importance (tip o' the hat to charter88.org.uk)

    This makes me rather angry. Hulk... smash... But what can I do? I'm only a voter.

    .
    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  120. DOS isn't constitutionally protected... by bryane · · Score: 1
    [U]pscale NYC shoe store acting like confused tourists from Maryland, ... converged on the Macy's carpet department to debate the quality of the rugs for sale. ... Sounds like a fun, harmless, and Constitutionally-protected way of blowing off a little steam.


    I don't think the Constitution allows you to congregate on private property, nor do a DOS attack on the carpet department of a store.
    1. Re:DOS isn't constitutionally protected... by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, would you charge them with?

      Conspiracy to look at rugs at a department store?

      Conspiracy to confuse NYC shoe salespeople by asking confused questions while impersonating a tourist?

      It's like using a parking lot to get around a red light. It's technically illegal, but if you ever get stopped, what are you going to say? I'd say I simply pulled in to the parking lot intending to shop, but changed my mind at the last second.

      --
      -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    2. Re:DOS isn't constitutionally protected... by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      Obstruction of (pedistrian) traffic. Disturbing the peace. Terrorism (I'm sure its in the Patriot act somewhere)

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  121. Current cheesebikini page by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1
    OUCH.
    the traffic brought the server to its kn-n-n-n-n-nn-n--nees...eeessss.
    come back in a bit;
    we'll have cheesebikini up again as soon as possible.
    Welcome to the jungle. We've got fun and games...

    (extra letters in knees added by me...)

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  122. Karma Whoring by Sklivvz · · Score: 1

    Site is slashdotted :-)
    Google cache is here!

    Please mod as informative hehehe :-)

  123. Flash Mobs = Slashdotting? by DjReagan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So this is basically a bunch of people going and doing a real-life meat-space slashdotting of public places?

    --
    "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
  124. Reminds me of idea .... by Flossymike · · Score: 1

    The idea was to organise robbing a bank, but since movies tell us it is impossible ot keep these things quiet, you should do the reverse and advertise that there was going to be a bank robbery and invite everyone to join in ... how could the authorities appropriately respond? Have all the police force guarding every bank?

  125. WASP by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the science fiction book "WASP" by Eric Frank Russell he quotes an early example of this when one person stared at the sky intently, muttering about flames - pretty soon there was a small crowd and in the end the air-force was sent up to investigate. I can't recall where it happened (in eastern Europe, I believe). The book is highly recommended (albeit slightly dated now as it was written in the days of the height of the cold war and the obvious parallels are less relevant now)

    Just another example of Matt Groening's (obligatory Simpson's reference) life view that individuals are clever, crowds are stupid

  126. Yeah by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    ...but it's against the rules in the new one to notice.

  127. This is not a Flash mob by Dan9999 · · Score: 1

    since it is prepared in advance... what else is there to say, except that it sounds like fun. here siggy siggy, here boy

  128. Sure, you're laughing now.... by rarkm · · Score: 1

    I should note that the technique works on the web, too. This article seems to have temporarily brought the cheesebikini site to its knees. It's fairly easy to overwhelm most web servers -- even the biggest have limits.

    I would expect that the usual progression with these ideas will be followed: it will be taken up by the intellectually deft, then the intellectually curious, then the Newsweek readers, then the low-life scum. That's when the fun will stop and Senator Snuffy will step in demanding new legislation.

    While this technique would seem to be an anarchists' wet dream, it is a club that anyone can use. (Just more evidence that technology develops in unpredictable ways that are not necessarily as beneficial as originally envisaged) It will all end in tears.

    --
    [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
  129. These people must be geeks.. by spaic · · Score: 1

    Their using assembly for some spontaneous fun coding? geez.

  130. Traffic Light Game by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was probably very sad but nonetheless.

    When my friends and I were teenagers and used to find ourselves wandering the streets at 3AM in the morning ( usually ending up at all night petrol stations ) we devised what we like to think of as street theatre.

    Usually the area of town we hung around in was as quiet as a grave and you'd hardly ever see anyone else at that time in the morning. When there was a fair sized crowd of us ( 8+ ) we would all position ourselves on various sides of the street near a set of traffic lights.

    As a car approached somone would press the lights to get the car to stop and everyone would by then be walking up to and over the traffic lights like we were all unknown to each other and just happened to all turn up at this particular set of traffic lights at the same time and carry on off in different directions.

    I always found it very amusing and luckily so the Police when we had mistaken them for a normal car and carried out this trick on two different traffic lights on the same set of road. We stopped them at both lights but the driver was seen to clap his hands in slow applause at the second.

  131. Sounds like a fun, harmless, and Constitutionally-protected way of blowing off a little steam.

    Yeah, because the people who actually work in those places, or have errands to run, or something worthwhile to do don't matter. They're just meanies who want to spoil your fun.

    The sick/funny part is that the people who do this crap probably like to say and think that they are on the side of the common man ... secretely they are elitists, who think that the rest of humanity who doesn't share their ideas exists only for their amusement.

    1. Re:not by radja · · Score: 1

      why would I not be allowed to play practical jokes on companies? basically, that's all it is. the 'victim' of the joke may not appreciate it. and it may not even be funny. and besides, fun in and of itself is much more worthwhile than just about any job. I can live without a job. I cannot live without fun.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  132. A Happening by Hadji+Baba · · Score: 1

    Some of the older crowd may remember the 60's when a flash mob was known as a "Happening" (supposidely created by Yoko Ono)... I am showing my age! Only difference is we got together spontaneously in a park or other common area to think of peace and love, smoke some pot, have a few beers and basically kick back. What's old is new, what's new is old.

  133. Not in the UK :-( by turgid · · Score: 1

    The 1995 Criminal Justice Bill outlawed public gatherings of more than 5 people. It also banned the use of devices designed to make repetitive noises. This was an attempt by the rotten, archaic and out-of-touch Conservative government to make "raves" illegal.

    1. Re:Not in the UK :-( by iapetus · · Score: 1

      Fortunately it also had the side-effect of making Ian Duncan Smith illegal. Hopefully we'll soon be entirely free of his repetitive noises.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:Not in the UK :-( by turgid · · Score: 1

      LOL :-)

  134. Re:Distraction (also Deep Eddy) by ForceOfWill · · Score: 1

    Sterling wrote another story about spontaneous mobs, "Deep Eddy", in A Good Old-Fashioned Future. There they took over entire cities, and they called them 'Wende's. Sort of like Mardi Gras, but unplanned. One character says (sort of like 'in soviet russia...') "You don't 'throw' a Wende. A Wende throws you."

    --

    --
    Seeing is believing; You wouldn't have seen it if you didn't believe it.
  135. Now I Understand What I Saw The Other Day by kmilani2134 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I left my office in SoHo (NYC) the other afternoon and saw a mob of people in the shoe store across the street. It is a fairly large shoe store and the whole front of the shoe store is all windows so you can see inside quite easily. The whole place was packed with people and there were even a fair number of people outside the place.

    There were easily half a dozen people with cameras who were holding their cameras up and taking snapshots. WhatI found strange is that they didn't seem to really be focusing their cameras on anything in particular.

    I thought for sure that there must have been some famous person shopping at the store, but that doesn't usually cause such a strange buzz in NYC (unless you are in Times Square with the tourists).

    The first I have heard about flash mobs is through this story on slashdot. And as soon as I read the story, I knew that is what I had seen. When you don't know about flash mobs, the whole thing kind of leaves you a little bit bewildered, yet it absolutely gets your attention.

    --
    Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
  136. reported on NPR by bob_calder · · Score: 1

    NPR afternoon talk Fresh Air (I think) ran an interview with a participant way over a month ago. They had just done the rug thing.

    --
    Any preoccupation with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct shows an arrested intellectual development. (Wilde)
  137. It also has a practical application. by lysium · · Score: 1
    Specifically for outlaw party scenes in any number of our repressive cities (Is that not a Protest in and of itself?). In NY, for example, nightlife has been funneled into a set amount of nightclubs, run by businesspeople who are (a) only interested in money, not trouble; and (b) easy to keep under thumb for policing. Any sort of social gathering made outside this careful system is met with harsh prejudice.

    Now the best parties run on a system similar to these flash mobs: the location is completely unknown until a few hours before it begins. An announcement travels by phone and email through the social network, and voila: 300-500 people ready to have completely unsupervised fun.

    Occasionally the police do shut things down; now imagine if everyone had wireless personal email (a mailing list of participants?) that would allow them to flee and regroup at another location.....

    -----------

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  138. Screw them by dachshund · · Score: 1
    Try being a pedestrian during one of these Critical Mass things. It's ironic that bicyclists, who feel so put upon by motorists, have absolutely no regard whatsoever for people who choose to use their own two feet to get around.

    Last time one of these CM things came through, I stood waiting at a crosswalk for almost ten minutes as the bikers blithely ignored the traffic signals. Think bikes are the perfect form of transportation? Wait until some idiot's coming at you at 15 miles per hour when you've got a Walk signal.

    Made me want to buy a Humvee, that's what it accomplished.

  139. How is this different by Boomhauer · · Score: 1

    How is flash mobbing different from posting the URL of a small website (cheesebikini.com anyone?) on /. ?

    =C=

    --
    If you wanted me to agree with you, you shouldn't have given me Mod points.
  140. This Reminds Me of Larry Niven's Novels by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    Some of his stories were based around some of the unexpected effects of having instantaneous matter transmitters. People could get into a public booth, and poof!, go anywhere on the planet.

    Problem was, sometimes a particular place on the planet would become of great interest to a great number of people, everybody would rush there, and you have a "flash mob." Like the /. effect for matter transmitters.

    Maybe somebody knows the stories I'm thinking of?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:This Reminds Me of Larry Niven's Novels by RallyDriver · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking of this story ....

      http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Crowd

    2. Re:This Reminds Me of Larry Niven's Novels by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      yup, that's it!

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  141. White House, North Fence, July 26, 1800EST by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I say we get a group to go stand at the north-side fence (by Lafayette Park) of the White House and give a resounding "Boo!" for about 60 seconds while giving thumbs down (no obscene gestures), then just leaving. Absolutely peaceful, no signs, just a really vocal show of disapproval. Saturday, July 26, at 1800EST.

    1. Re:White House, North Fence, July 26, 1800EST by Lethyos · · Score: 1

      I'm there. Look for a couple riding bikes. I like the other guy's idea: the suggestion about alternating between love and hate. I'm sure the SS won't know what to think about that one. ;-)

      --
      Why bother.
    2. Re:White House, North Fence, July 26, 1800EST by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

      I'll just assume they were being sarcastic. :) Nobody ever gathers near the White House for a show of approval! The very notion is utter nonsense!

  142. Re:sig by Sebby · · Score: 1

    Oh, poor little American can't handle the truth?

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  143. Good answers. Now more questions. by lysium · · Score: 1
    ...thus encouraging our pack-instincts to re-assert themselves.

    What is the difference between sentient beings acting in concert and unsentient cells acting in concert?
    Which cell am I (the I) in? Or am I somewhere in between the individual units?

    ---------

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Good answers. Now more questions. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What is the difference between sentient beings acting in concert and unsentient cells acting in concert?

      Ooldes and oodles. Not the least of which being that a cell cannot act in an sentient manner on its own; the cells that make up a sentient being are sentient only when assembled.

      Now, if we take "sentience" out of the picture, we have the possiblity of treating groups of social animals as one "mental organism." But this is a hack, not a good fit, as a pack/swarm/flock has an non-finite lifespan, and can far-outlive even the longest-lived animals we know of.

      Which cell am I (the I) in? Or am I somewhere in between the individual units?

      You are a seperate organism, that has instinctual preferences that encourage you to operate in a social structure with other members of your species. Because you are sentient, you can ignore this genetic encouragement if you so will it.

  144. My WTO Seattle experience by nick_drake · · Score: 1
    I was in downtown Seattle during the WTO meetings. From my perspective, there were lots of peaceful protesters, but unfortunately there were also a bunch of wannabe anarchists who just used the situation as an opportunity to break windows and turn over cars.

    Interestingly, I spoke with one man from Holland (I think) who was wearing a business suit. I asked him what he thought about all the craziness in the streets and about the WTO. He said "Actually, I'm a WTO ambassador. I support the Organization." Lucky for him, I didn't start screaming hysterically and pointing at him.

    But actually, I don't think it would have mattered much anyway. The real violence was coming from misguided cops who didn't see any distinction between gutter punks out for fun and the peaceful protesters who were naively trying to organize even the punks into managed crowds.

    The annoying/scary thing about the situation was that the cops were trying to disperse the crowds with teargas, but they had everyone surrounded, so the crowd kept getting more compacted, which resulted in more teargas and more hysteria. Somehow my friend and I found an alley and escaped the inner crowd and watched from the outside. I don't know why more people didn't see that escape route, but it was pretty manic, so I guess most people just overlooked it.

    I knew some people who were held captive by the police for over 24 hours without being charged or even fed. Some of the people were not even involved in the protest, they were just trying to go home after working downtown.

    All in all, I wasn't really impressed with anyone involved (except for myself for finding that escape route just in time).

    --
    The Dude abides.
  145. Flash Mob = Shoplifting by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    The "mass of people enter at once" tactic is used by some gangs to rob conveience stores. If 50 people run in and clean out the beer cooler (and cigarrettes) there is a lower probability of each individual being caught and less that the poor sap behind the counter can do.

    I can't see this activity being non-violent and non-criminal for long. Sooner or later some punk will start taking stuff and it'll just be white-collar gang activity.

    Also, on private property, this activity could be percieved as a threat. Some store managers or owners may have a bad reaction to the activity.

    That said, it's an interesting activity. But maybe they should do something a little less obnoxious, like decend on a park and pick up all the litter and dog poop or something, rather than antagoizing retailers and annoying customers.

  146. The Situationist Front by Tewley · · Score: 1

    Guy Debord:

    "A person's life is a succession of fortuitous situations, and even if none of them is exactly the same as another the immense majority of them are so undifferentiated and so dull that they give a perfect impression of sameness. As a result, the rare intensely engaging situations found in life only serve to strictly confine and limit that life. We must try to construct situations, that is to say, collective ambiances, ensembles of impressions determining the quality of a moment. If we take the simple example of a gathering of a group of individuals for a given time, it would be desirable, while taking into account the knowledge and material means we have at our disposal, to study what organization of the place, what selection of participants and what provocation of events are suitable for producing the desired ambiance. The powers of a situation will certainly expand considerably in both time and space with the realizations of unitary urbanism or the education of a situationist generation.

    The construction of situations begins beyond the ruins of the modern spectacle."

  147. Sounds like you are in a mental rut...... by lysium · · Score: 1
    I often find myself sinking into that mindset, but I always make sure to snap out of it. Going from home to work and back again with blinders on is no way to live life.

    Ever consider living and working in Singapore? You might find many kindred spirits there. That would leave a little more room in American cities for people who want to exercise their....you know, Freedoms.

    -------------

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  148. Hit and Run Accordian Band by dcigary · · Score: 1

    One of the funniest things I've ever heard of was from my Uncles in Wisconsin. They gathered together with about 5-6 other people who all played accordians, and they would go out on "Hit and Run Accordian" nights. Basically, they would all be drunk as skunks, barge into a restraunt or bar, play 2-3 songs all on the accoridan, and then split. Remember, this was the 1950's, and they were all from small towns where everyone knew who they were anyhow, but the thought of all those accordians together playing just cracks me up!

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  149. "No force on earth can stop one hundred Santas!" by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 2, Informative

    This story on flash mobs reminds me of Santarchy.

    Flash mobs, meet lots of Santas informally gathering at the same place and time.

    www.santarchy.com

  150. Private vs Public Space by macguiguru · · Score: 1

    Okay, riddle me this batman: how can a store "Open to the public" (their words, not mine) even THINK about using that logic? Yes, the store is OWNED privately, but they INVITE THE PUBLIC - frequently. It's called advertising. Sorry, I just don't agree. As long as the area they're gathering in is "open to the public" it's legal. It would be different, I believe, if these folk were mobbing the loading dock or the back room or the manager's office, but the "publicly-accessible" part of the store? Nope. Won't fly in court - promise you that. The minute you let this kind of nazi BS become government policy, you can plan on those stores selling brown shirts.

    1. Re:Private vs Public Space by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Not liking a law, or thinking a law doesn't make sense doesn't make it any less enforceable. Yes, the store is open to the public, but that doesn't mean anyone can come in and do whatever they want. Ever seen the no shoes no shirt no service signs? Ever seen signs that say "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone?" Ever seen the no skateboarding or no loitering signs? It's private property and you are basically being invited in for the purpose of shopping of dining (if you can call it that) at the food court. If the people in charge of that private property decide that you are causing a problem they have every right to ask you to leave. A building that is open to the public, and one that is public property are two very differant things.

      Under your logic if you held a party at your house that was advertised as "open to the public" you wouldn't be able to get rid of the people that were inside your house being a nuisance.

    2. Re:Private vs Public Space by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Because it is private property. You will probably also notice a sign that says, "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone." And so long as their policy is not discriminatory they have every right to do so. Let's remember one the basic tenets of America is Life, Liberty and Property

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
  151. Slashdotting like... by jokercito · · Score: 1

    So is slashdotting the geeky way to flash mob a server?

    Get off my server you troublemaking kids!!!

    *Grumble*

  152. Clearly the Discordians are behind this. by 23$kidoo · · Score: 1

    It's all part of Operation Mindfuck.

    Hail Eris! Hail Discordia! Kallisti!

  153. nothing to fear by cornjones · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have a good, well thought out, argument, or link to an argument, on the idea:
    "if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't worry about XXX privacy concern."

    The idea really doesn't sit well with me but I find myself having trouble conveying my concerns to people who really don't get it. Most of my arguments seem to be along the line of "Well, you really do have something to hide" and "who defines unacceptable?".

    I assume there is a well reasoned argument to this but I haven't been able to google it so I thought I would ask here.

    ej

    1. Re:nothing to fear by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just ask them what they earn. When they refuse to tell you ask them why they want to keep it secret have they done soemthing wrong?

    2. Re:nothing to fear by cornjones · · Score: 1

      HA!!

      That is great. I think I will do that.

      While I was searching I ran found this link, thought I would share:
      http://www.infoworld.com/article/02/05/29/ 020531op ethics_1.html

    3. Re:nothing to fear by Politburo · · Score: 1

      You will find no such link because no such argument exists. "If you're not breaking the law, you don't have to worry" is the rallying cry of facists. One day, the law may change, and you may be breaking the law. All of the sudden, all of your rights are gone. You signed them away when you were law-abiding.

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance" -- Thom. Jefferson

  154. Flashing mobs (nudity) by Linuxathome · · Score: 2, Funny

    The title of the story had me confused. At first, before reading the article, I thought the story pertained to mobs getting together to see people flash themselves. Shucks, I was wrong.

    1. Re:Flashing mobs (nudity) by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Now, that I would go out to see.

  155. powers reserved to states vs. rights by McFly777 · · Score: 1

    Ok I wanted to provide a nice quotation but wasn't find it quickly, but...

    IIRC, there is a statement that the states et al. cannot pass laws that contradict the US Constitution. Note the "prohibited by it to the States". So if the constitution gives the right to peaceably assemble, then a State/Local govt. cannot overrule that right.

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  156. marketing weasels by tomdarch · · Score: 1
    I'm sure that numerous marketing weasels are looking at how to expoit this sort of thing.

    Today, hundreds of teenage girls took the bridges and tunnels into Manhattan in order to stand in Times Square (oddly enough, at a spot within view of the MTV studios). They burst into cheers of "We love Justin" and aped his 'dance moves'. Almost as soon as they gathered, they dispersed to buy his latest poster. Said one participant, 'It was so totally cool! I was chatting with my friends on AIM, and, like, someone we didn't know, but knew that we were huge Justin fans popped up and told us about this cool event. She said she totally loves Justin, just like us. But, like, when we chatted with her, she kind of repeated herself a bunch of times, kinda like a robot. But, like, whatever!"

  157. Now I Know How Truth Did It by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    How else can you explain them managing to somehow get 1500 people to stage a "die in" in front of tobacco companies, let alone all the other cute little stunts they do to advertise the evils of smoking?

    Thus spoketh Dennis Leary, "Holy shit! These are bad for you! I thought they had vitamins in them and stuff!"

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  158. Lemmings? by Bubblesculpter · · Score: 1



    Isn't this kinda like lemmings blindly following someone else's instructions.

    What if it was a 'trap', and everybody who joined in on the flash mob got kidnapped, shot, raped, etc?

    --
    www.Beyond7.com Insane modern art water sculpture.
  159. Open to Public vs Public Property by macguiguru · · Score: 1

    Good point. With regard to the folks in the store loudly debating, as long as they're not harming the store (sure, it's loud, but it's NOT stopping business) I really don't think there's a legal leg to stand on. As for a party and my house: usually invitations (at least the ones I write) have Start and Stop times. Folks don't want to leave at Stop time - ask police to remove them. Pretty basic. *grin* Simple way for the store to deal quickly and effectively with this? Public address system "The store is now closed" and people would have to leave or be escorted out by security. Repubelickin way of dealing with this? "The Constitution is now repealed!!! SHOOT THEM ALL!!!" Demonicrat way of dealing with this? "PUT UP MORE SIGNS! SUE!" Maybe just a little common sense and a sense of humor would help.

    1. Re:Open to Public vs Public Property by onepoint · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that someone will get wise to the Idea of how fun doing a mobbing ( with the robot dance or something ) and then screw it up for the rest.

      I bet as we speak someone is trying to find a way to get a store set up to be mobbed and then rob it at the same time.

      I have not got to do a robot dance but I was in the Great 5th Avenue Sneeze

      Onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  160. Which came first... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    ... the road, or the automobile?

    For bonus points, care to venture a guess as to by how many years (mellenia, actually) one predates the other?

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  161. Multiple Santas... by Odinson · · Score: 1
    " as well as to that city's holiday tradition of the Santa Rampage, in which odd Santas pop up in various neighborhoods to hand out weird gifts to locals."

    Cummon who else thought of multiple santa from the tick.

    1000 people in santa outfits running the wrong way down 5th ave, yelling in unison.

    "HO HO HO!"

    "HO HO HO!"

    "HO HO HO!"

    "HO HO HO!"

    And they all disappear.

    I know what you are thinkning though.. Are they evil Santas?

  162. Careful now by macguiguru · · Score: 1

    Just be careful - the folks in the tanks might just get frightened an shoot ye.

  163. Ah, so you believe in collective punishment? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    > 2. See mob smash windows, break things...and break
    > the peace

    Sorry, but in a just system; if you, yourself, PRESONALLY, did not do these things, the cops have no business in the world arresting you, beating you, gassing you, herding you, in ANY way harassing you, or even so much as speaking a word to you.

    All YOU have done is provide an example that demonstrates that our "justice" system is, in no way, just.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  164. area 51 + flash mob = truth overnight by witts · · Score: 1

    I've always thought the only way to get to the bottom of Area 51 (possible home of ufo's and alien bodies) would be for 100,000 people to show up and storm the chain link fences and go through the base and have a good look at what's going on. Of course, Area 51 is a restricted site with use of deadly force authorized, but are they really going to "off" 100,000 people in one night? Politically not possible... The only down side could be that the mob destroys valuable research projects or leaks national secrets about advanced weapons, so I might not like the aftermath if this every really happened, but it's something to think about during my bored moments...

    --
    pot.kettle(black);
    1. Re:area 51 + flash mob = truth overnight by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      While we're at it let's storm Fort David, or any other military establishment, Soldiers won't shoot people en masse who march on their locations would they? What do you mean that's their primary job?

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  165. A suggestion by macguiguru · · Score: 1

    How about mooning?

  166. They'd kill em by macguiguru · · Score: 1

    Don't forget who's prezzydint. They'd snuff em like rabid gophers and not blink an eyelash.

  167. Re:Bruce Sterling? Larry Niven! by kwashiorkor · · Score: 1

    In name, it's deffinately a nod to Niven. I'd still say in concept it sounds closer to what Sterling outlined in Distraction.

    The "flash mobs" are not formed by newsworthy events and instant teleportation. Rather, they are formed via standard comm channels, travel in a much more conventional way, and perform seemingly random acts much like the crowds in Distraction, hence my nod to Sterling rather than Niven. (Probably a case of Flash Mobs from Sterling which was from Niven originally... children of children and all of that.)

    --
    -- kwashiorkor --
    Leaps in Logic
    should not be confused with
    Jumping to Conclusions.
  168. Other things to do to people by dacarr · · Score: 1
    1) Go to the mall and just look up inquisitively.
    2) Watch as people gather around and do the same
    3) Walk away, mind your own business
    4) Return, note the crowd has shuffled about and/or rotated entirely

    It is not clear as to why people do this. Note also that it is not adviseable to attempt to profit from this.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  169. Get a clue by AgentTim3 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but Critical Mass is one of the most assbackwards stupid things I've ever witnessed in my life. Protests of this sort are nothing more than a bunch of ignorant whiny idiots trying to get attention.

    Share the road? Absolutely we'll share it. Just keep this in mind. What percentage of taxpayers that paid for the road drive cars vs. ride bicycles? Sharing works both ways, and roads are primarily designed to suit the needs of drivers.

    Want to talk about what the law states? I drive to work every day. I see bikers every day. Every single one I have EVER seen in the city breaks traffic laws CONSTANTLY, no exception. You want fair treatment? Quit running red lights, quit dodging through three lanes of traffic at once, quit riding inbetween lanes of traffic. Sure, some drivers are careless and malicious. Every single biker I've ever seen has a completely blatant disregard for traffic laws. You want to co-exist peacefully in that environment? Start following the F-ing rules.

    One more point, and this is the thing that totally blows my mind about these damn fool protests. What the hell are you trying to accomplish with it? Draw attention to your cause? Make some kind of statement? Well congratulations asshole, you've done that. You've got a whole city full of commuters aware that there's a group of bikers out there with issues, AND THEY'RE PISSED AS HELL AT THEM. You've got an issue and you want supporters? Well great, there's two steps to that.

    1) Raise awareness.
    2) Convince people to support you.

    I know this may be a shocking revelation, but it's gonna be pretty hard to accomplish #2 when your method for achieving #1 pisses off 99% of the general population.

    People, pull your heads out of your asses. Don't participate in these types of protests, it only fans the flames.

  170. Re:That wasnt flamebait, you cocksucker. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    To be a flamebait, it has to be intended to generate responces- flames, to be precise. The above obviously was not, as it did not contain enough information to produce a flame. YOU IDIOT.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  171. I think this flashmob stuff is fantastic. by edeljoe · · Score: 1

    * it brings the marvelous and surreal into the everyday world much more effectively than more conventional visual or performance art

    * unlike most guerrila theatre, it is democratic in that everyone who wants to can be "on the inside"

    * it is an active, participatory, and creative pastime

    * it is empowering, and yet doesn't carry a particular ideology

    * it gets people out of their ordinary routines and ways of being

    * it has an action-adventure supercoordinated flair to it that I love

    etc

    I think it has a revolutionary potential to make life in human cities much more colorful.

    I hope that participation becomes at least as popular as yoga, all over the world.

    1. Re:I think this flashmob stuff is fantastic. by ITgrrrl · · Score: 1

      Just because a mob is brought together initially for a surreal event and behaves peacefully doesn't mean it can't turn into a 'really' angry mob in pretty short order.

      The technique has great potential for mayhem as well as positive social action. The behavior of the mob is reliant on either the good sense and good will of the individual participants, or a dynamic leader who can keep an eye on the situation and defuse any anti social tendencies real fast.

      --
      'The longing to be primitive is a disease of culture' George Santayana
  172. Re:okay, this is what bugs me about this. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot. Many of the people here don't know what fun is. Either that, or they are alergic to it.

  173. though it turned out differently in Deliverance by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    When your driving alog the road in a wooded area up in Maine and decide to pull over and point in to the woods

    ... suddenly Ned Beaty heard someone talking about squealing like a piggy. Flash-mobbed his rear end pretty good.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  174. Re:FLASH MOB! by docricketts · · Score: 1

    I agree 110%. However, many of these folks have a hard time handling the traffic such a mob would create. This was actually one of my very first Flashmob ideas, but when I asked some local foodbanks about how we could do it, they totally blanched at the idea. I welcome suggestions on how to make it a reality.

    Rob Z.
    http://www.flocksmart.com/

    --
    ------ Often it's not the technology that's high, but the people who create it.
  175. Is it a flash mob or is it Memorex? by WillASeattle · · Score: 1

    What about everyone staring straight up in the sky and acting shocked.. making everyone around stare up.

    I was part of a flash mob in Seattle, at the Pike Place Market, where we did exactly that, about two or three years ago.

    It was fun!

    Most people didn't get it - amazing how gullible people are, most of them spent 2-3 minutes staring where we were staring at, even though there was nothing there.

    --
    > --- All Of The Above --- >
  176. Best kind of flash mob by WillASeattle · · Score: 1

    is one in which fifty people all get together at the beginning of rush hour and drive at the speed limit (or lower), across all lanes, with a 4-5 second gap between cars, going back and forth along the route.

    If you've ever seen it, you'd be amazed ...

    --
    > --- All Of The Above --- >
  177. I have no Constitution and I must Flash by WillASeattle · · Score: 1

    I thought they phased out that Constitution thing a few years ago.

    Somebody sold it on eBay to Mongolia. Said his name was Ashcroft, I think.

    I've heard they still have one in Canada. Quaint, eh?

    --
    > --- All Of The Above --- >
  178. The AntiMob movement begins by flashhack · · Score: 1
    How is it possible that a technology with such potential to empower the individual -- has turned into an irritating clique-machine for the hipster sheep?
    You know what I'm talking about.

    The Flash Mob.
    This self-proclaimed movement of self-empowering "spontaneous" public performance has reached internet critical mass in just three months.
    Hundreds have gathered to embarrass themselves in New York. More than once. And it is spreading.
    Berlin, that epitome of existential cool, has succumbed. But I feel no shadenfreude.
    Flash Mobs don't even deserve to hit places like Akron and Boise, though I am sure they soon will.
    Like Trucker Caps, soul-patches, and the I Kiss You Guy: it is a stupid idea that got bigger, and stupider, before anyone had the good sense and guts to smack it down.
    So: Let's put it all to a silly death right now.

    Hack the Flash Mob!
    Its time to social engineer the texting, blackberry-checking, cell-phone sheep that promote this waste of public space.
    Flash Mobs: Your 15 minutes are over.
    Disperse now.