Slashdot Mirror


The Trilogy as One

jmays writes "New Line is re-releasing 'The Fellowship of the Ring' and 'The Two Towers' except this time, in their respective extended versions. When? Once each week for the two weeks prior to the opening of 'The Return of the King.'"

441 comments

  1. That will be fun by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 4, Informative

    I felt that the extended edition of fellowship was a lot better than the studio version. It will be fun to see it in the theaters.

    I'm less excited about Two Towers since I found the movie to be a disappointment. I'll still go check it out though. (who am i kidding, i'll still probably buy the dvd Tolkien whore that I am).

    I don't know about the Dec 16th all day marathon though. Something about going to a movie at 3pm and leaving after midnight. Besides, my GF has enough trouble staying awake in a 1.5 hour long movie.

    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:That will be fun by pizzaman100 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder if they will allow catherders into the theater...

    2. Re:That will be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you switch hands they won't fall asleep as quickly!

    3. Re:That will be fun by ph43thon · · Score: 5, Funny

      and what exactly would the cat herders be doing?

    4. Re:That will be fun by Thuktun · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about the Dec 16th all day marathon though. Something about going to a movie at 3pm and leaving after midnight.

      I'm happily raising my part of a new generation of Tolkien fans.

      When Fellowship came out in theaters, the whole family went. My youngest son, then four, watched the whole thing without fidgeting, which for him was (and still is) amazing. No, he wasn't in a rictus of fear for the entire thing, he was just enthralled. He was a little scared at Amun Sul(*) and other times the Nazgul(*) appeared, but didn't want to look away or leave. He ran to the bathroom once it was over, but he was soon asking to see it again.

      There's no way he could possibly sit through all three of these films in one sitting, especially with how they've padded the first (two?) with new scenes.

      (*) Darn slashcode, it seems to strip out the circumflexes over the u's in those words.

    5. Re:That will be fun by harley_frog · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't know about the Dec 16th all day marathon though. Something about going to a movie at 3pm and leaving after midnight. Besides, my GF has enough trouble staying awake in a 1.5 hour long movie.

      In that case, I would suggest avoiding Wagnerian operas as well; one of Wagner's operas can last 3 hours, with or without intermissions! As for me, I would love watching the full trilogy in one day, just have a strether nearby to carry me out.

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
    6. Re:That will be fun by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Besides, my GF has enough trouble staying awake in a 1.5 hour long movie.

      Leave her home!

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    7. Re:That will be fun by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      herding cats, obviously

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    8. Re:That will be fun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Its that kind of talk that makes people think geeks can't get dates.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:That will be fun by rifter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Leave her home!

      I say fuck her.

    10. Re:That will be fun by drank · · Score: 1
      In that case, I would suggest avoiding Wagnerian operas as well; one of Wagner's operas can last 3 hours, with or without intermissions!
      It's so true. I just went to Seattle Opera's production of Parsifal last night. 244 minutes of music plus two 30 minute intermissions. Now that's an "extended edition"!

      Awesome performance, though. Highly recommended for any music fans in the Seattle area.

    11. Re:That will be fun by harley_frog · · Score: 1
      That is awesome. Makes me wish I lived nearby. Personally, I would love to attend the Bayreuth Festival someday.

      Der Ring des Nibelungen, the other ring story.

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
    12. Re:That will be fun by K8Fan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dunno, but a catheter might be a good idea. But I don't look forward to putting one in.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    13. Re:That will be fun by l810c · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This thing is hilarious

      For some real humor read the testimonials

    14. Re:That will be fun by peacegoddss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wouldn't you miss a lot of the movie then?

    15. Re:That will be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Leave her home!

      I say fuck her.


      No! Just leave her home and I'll fuck her.

    16. Re:That will be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 minutes out of 3 hour movie? acceptable.

    17. Re:That will be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get laid much, do you? ;-)

    18. Re:That will be fun by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Since when does your GF have to follow you around on exactly everything you do? Hmm, perhaps it's just me and my friends, but they have good relationships and spend a lot of time together, but the girlfriend has her friends since earlier, and the guy has his friends since earlier. And I usually don't say "no way, you can't go out with your friends to do that" without a very good reason. And I don't count watching LOTR with your buddies being such a reason.

      Perhaps a reality check would be in place here...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    19. Re:That will be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say about five minutes worth.

    20. Re:That will be fun by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      Damn, I guess I'm lucky that my girlfriend is every bit as big a geek as me. She was right there with me waiting in the front of the line for "The Two Towers". When she sent me this, before I saw it on Slashdot, she said "it's going to be a long 4 months".

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    21. Re:That will be fun by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, there is a wide variety of different catheters on the market, including many that you can just slip on - usually referred to as a "condom catheter." No "insertion" necessary. Enjoy!

    22. Re:That will be fun by Strandman · · Score: 1

      Besides, my GF has enough trouble staying awake in a 1.5 hour long movie.

      Leave her home!


      When you talk about GF and "trouble staying awake" I read that as:
      Besides my GrandFather has enough trouble staying awake....

      GirlFriend, yeah sure

    23. Re:That will be fun by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link! I had no idea. The condom one looks comfortable enough (though I've never considered wearing a rubber for 11 or so hours before). But the ones with the adhesive strip doesn't look like a lot of fun to take off. If you weren't already circumcised...

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    24. Re:That will be fun by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      They'll be wearing the night vision goggles to stop those pesky pirates....

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    25. Re:That will be fun by thaths · · Score: 1

      Leave her home

      She'll leave his home.

    26. Re:That will be fun by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      Now that's a keeper. ** personally sitting through 12 hours of LOTR is something I will prefer to do solo.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    27. Re:That will be fun by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      Me too.

      And when Toronto finallllly gets its own proper Opera house they've promised us a Ring Cycle

      /me hopes....

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    28. Re:That will be fun by peacegoddss · · Score: 1

      But then you'll both sleep through the rest of the movie!

  2. Dec. 16th Marathons by Chaltek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps more exciting than the extended edition re-releases is the promise of marathon showings December 16th.
    FOTR @ 1500
    TTT @ 1900
    ROTK @ 2300

    Not only can you to see the entire story at once, but beat all the other line-standing fans by 1 whole hour!
    That must count for some serious geek points in the grand scheme of things.

    Call your favorite theater today and request that they carry this special engagement. If they won't, drive to a big city, this ought to be worth it!

    1. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Brad+Cossette · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you image the effects of having an entire nerd populace sitting on its backside for 9 straight hours of LOTR?
      - Viruses go rampant as sysadmins fail to respond to urgent system messages
      - Patches, code deadlines missed
      - Executives everywhere are paralyzed as their IT depts leave for a whole day and they can't figure out what to do when that Blue Screen with the white letters appears (in case you're reading this: reboot)
      - More importantly, the obesity % of the American populace has a massive spike

      --
      -- "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars" [Oscar Wilde]
    2. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Guysdrinkingbeer · · Score: 1

      Well, I know where I am going to be for nine hours on the 16th. Thanks for the info.

      --
      Great people don't need people to complete them, great people complete other people. -- Matthew Pawlikowski.
    3. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about the effect on the theatre? Bring your gas masks boys.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    4. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Xenoproctologist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will every ticket to these special engagements come with a free catheter so we won't have to get up in the exact middle of all three movies to avoid reaching bladder critical-mass? What about a caffeine IV-drip?

    5. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by wallyghost · · Score: 0

      Ouch, deep vein thrombosis anyone? Hope they have intermissions.

    6. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by moquist · · Score: 0

      One trilogy to rule them all, one trilogy to find them. One trilogy to bring them all and in the theaters bind them...

    7. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by aled · · Score: 1

      9 hours? the extended versions will sum something more like 10 and half hours.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    8. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I dunno

      With a rather fast cable connection and KaZaa you can beat out those geeks by days... not hours.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    9. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I noticed "Explosion in birth rate" wasn't one of the noted effects.

    10. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Brad+Cossette · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering how often the average nerd actually gets to have sex, would you think their chances of having sex during a movie are better or worse?

      Especially LOTR...

      --
      -- "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars" [Oscar Wilde]
    11. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to worry about DVT's until you get into 20+ hours of sitting. The trilogy, with credits and whatnot, will weigh in at less than 12. Nothing to worry about.

    12. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I don't want to e the theatermonkey that has to clean the backs of the seats...

    13. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      exactly why I think all tech worker should go on strike for 1 day.
      SOmetimes its good to remind the people up stairs whats what.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, watching a downsampled, stereo only version on my 19" monitor would look just great.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    15. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by K8Fan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like some theater chains should seriously consider getting a T1 and a Wi-Fi system.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    16. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, same as what happened last week? (minus the obesity thing)

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    17. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the girl I bring being trapped with me in a dark room for ten hours with orcs uglier than me displayed on a big screen can only increase my chances.

    18. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus... this had better be in a cinema with armchairs rather than the usual arse-numbing seats.

      The Two Towers alone was bad enough... nine hours, and I doubt I'd ever be able to feel anything in my arse every again (ooo-errr).

    19. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those bigs cups are intended for dual use.

    20. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      That's not the point! ;) The point is to ruin the entire story days before it happens.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    21. Re:Dec. 16th Marathons by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 2, Funny

      And Slashdot has 0 submissions and 0 comments...

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
  3. Not my cup of tea by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know that I'm probably going to get flamed by the /. faithful but I really
    did not enjoy the first LOTR film and decided to not bother with the rest of
    the trilogy. I couldn't imagine the tedium of sitting through an extended
    version.

    The problem with them was that they were quite simply boring. Although the
    filmmakers had done this incredible technical job of putting the world of
    Middle Earth on the screen it felt horribly sterile. Of course it's often
    the case that a film doesn't work as well as the way you imagined the book,
    but in the case of LOTR the film seemed to have little merit. It was a
    long road movie without the depth of the Middle Earth world and relationships
    between the characters and the different type of characters lost in the
    filming.

    Not trying to troll, just that the film had all the look of Middle Earth
    without any of the feeling. A bit like Matrix Reloaded: all shiny but
    hollow at the same time.

    John.

    (Of course there was the incomparable Liv Tyler
    so it wasn't a totally wasted 3 hours :-)

    1. Re:Not my cup of tea by crashnbur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You just didn't get Matrix Reloaded. :-)

    2. Re:Not my cup of tea by Dugsmyname · · Score: 1

      I felt the same way after seeing the first film in the theatre, but I gave it another shot when the extended version came out on DVD... I watched it and then watched the extended version of the Two Towers... I enjoyed the 2nd movie much more than the first, but having never read the books, the history and background the first movie provides helped me enjoy the 2nd movie that much more.....

    3. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yikes! Liv Tyler should have been banned from that movie. That whole extended love story with her and Strider added nothing and if I was looking to see a hot piece of ass I'd just look on my harddrive. To the director's credit they did not focus much on her.

    4. Re:Not my cup of tea by phil+reed · · Score: 1
      I watched it and then watched the extended version of the Two Towers.

      Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but the extended version of Two Towers hasn't been released yet, right?

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    5. Re:Not my cup of tea by brakk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everybody always says that about any movie that comes out that was made from a book. "OMG, the book was so much better. blah blah blah. I'm such an elitist bastard blah blah blah" There is no way they can fit a book into a two hour screen play. Yes, I think LOTR felt a bit rushed trying to squeeze everything they could into it, even at three hours. But you have to look at them as two separate entities or just not see it in the first place because you know they could never do a decent book justice.

    6. Re:Not my cup of tea by gerf · · Score: 1

      Yikes! Liv Tyler should have been banned from that movie

      I agree. This movie isn't about romance, though there was a smidgen of it in the books, it was not focused on at all.

      It's not like the geeks/nerds reading and watching LoTR really know much about seducing a hot woman anyway. You gotta play to your audience, right?

      BTW, I was comparing how great the background of LoTR is compared to the new Star Wars. A beautiful canyon, a perfect valley, beats a computer generated wizz-bang traffic jam in a futuristic city any day of the week. Anyone else agree with me?

    7. Re:Not my cup of tea by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      John-
      I'm sorry to hear that you didn't knjoy the movie. However, if your main criticism is "it was boring" then you really need to re-evaluate the film. If the acting were bad, the plot simple and the effects horrible, then you can say it was a bad movie. But "boring" is too much the result of either too little imagination, sleepiness/depression, or misunderstanding. I once saw a movie while I was in a very bad mood, and I pretty much hated it. Upon seeing the same movie later in a better mood, I loved it.

      With that in mind, you may want to watch the movie again.

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    8. Re:Not my cup of tea by johndoesovich · · Score: 1

      Man you are smokin crack. Albeit the second was not as good as the first, but it was worth the money.

      --
      alias dir='rm -rf /'
    9. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No romance? You, sir, fail to see the homoerotic subtext between Frodo and Sam.

      It's a bit more subtle than Top Gun, but it's there. The only obvious sexuality in the entire series is when Sam fights Shelob, a scene that borders on soft porn.

      In other words, re-read the series the way any overanalytical pervert would. You'll never be able to see it any other way ;)

    10. Re:Not my cup of tea by bogie · · Score: 1

      No flaming, just too bad you feel that way. Most people including parents, kids, techies, nerds, jocks, etc consider this one of the greatest films of all time, let alone greatest fantasy film of all time. It's also IMO the best gateway to Middle Earth ever created. Besides LOTR there really are no decent full length movies about gnomes, elves, and wizards which aren't totally campy and unrealistic.(H.P. excluded) They all look very fake and have equally horrible writing.

      I guess its all what you take out of it. I agree the 2nd Matrix was totally hollow, but at the same time I don't see how you could possibly compare the two. Not to say your opinion is wrong, it's just that most people would argue with your theory that the LOTR series is hollow. The one comment where I will disagree completely is when you say it's "boring". It certainly was anything but boring. I guess if you've read the book 10 times and have a carved in granite view of how the movie "should" be you could say its boring. Beyond that if many of the scenes didn't excite you, better get that pulse checked. ;)

      If you are waiting for a better adaptation of the book you're going to be waiting for a long long time.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    11. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the movies there's also something homoerotic happening between Aragorn and Legolas. It bothered me almost as much as the Sam and Frodo thing and, since you mentioned it, Top Gun.

    12. Re:Not my cup of tea by techstar25 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree. I saw Titan A.E. while tripping on LSD, and I thought it was the greatest movie I've ever seen. I even cried at the end. I haven't watched it again since, so that I don't spoil the wonderful memory. ;)

    13. Re:Not my cup of tea by swillden · · Score: 1

      I think you should give it another shot and try the extended version. Much of the lost "feel" of Middle Earth was lost, IMO, in the attempt to cut the film down to a length that would work in theatres. The additional footage in the extended version makes a great deal of difference. Scenes like, for example, the gift-giving in Lothlorien don't add much to the story, per se, but they're very important to the feel and the depth of the characters. You just can't understand Gimli without seeing his change of heart about Galadriel, and in the extended version you get to understand that Boromir is not evil, just weak. Other bits like Aragorn's telling of the tale of Luthien, and some of the added banter between Aragorn and Pippin when they begin to travel add depth to those characters as well. And I really liked the extended view of Hobbiton at the beginning, which gives you a much better feel for Hobbits and the world from which Frodo, Samwise, Mariadoc and Peregrine come.

      As for Liv Tyler, I personally think the movie would have been much better if they'd cut her part down to about 30 seconds. Nothing against her as an actress, but Jackson has really overplayed the Aragorn/Arwen thing.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    14. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, okay moderators. We all know that not everyone liked FOTR. We've known that for almost two years now. So what exactly is so "interesting" about this?

      I'm not flaming the guy for his opinion (though he doesn't win any points by stating it as fact). Me, I liked the movie, but having also read the books, I can certainly see why someone else wouldn't have liked the adaptation. That still doesn't make his post "interesting," let alone "insightful." It's just one person's opinion of the film, pretty much indistinguishable from dozens of other negative opinions I've read over the past 20 months.

    15. Re:Not my cup of tea by asr_man · · Score: 1

      I often see this in posts from disappointed viewers:

      "...but having never read the books..."

      and all I can say is that if you weren't a fan of the books themselves, or not even a potential fan, you're unlikely to get much entertainment value from this series. There's too much left unsaid in the films (as it must be) for people who don't bring an awareness of the entire myth and its plot with them to the theatre to feel it click together like a reality before their eyes. And of course many people are simply bored with this kind of fantasy story regardless.

      But for people who aren't, and whose previous experience reading the books is deep enough that they know the background myth behind the story, this movie series is very entertaining. Though the pithier lines are reused verbatim, don't expect the character of the book to be borne out in the dialog -- look for it instead in the scenery, the physical appearance of the characters, and especially in the music.

    16. Re:Not my cup of tea by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      According to the LOTR web site, the extended version of TTT comes out in November, so you're right.....unless he has a source who got him a copy of it several months early.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    17. Re:Not my cup of tea by blowhole · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, maybe _that's_ why I liked Titan A.E. so much!

      But seriously, I tend to enjoy almost every movie I watch. I guess I'm just high on life?

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    18. Re:Not my cup of tea by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough I agree :-)

    19. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know everyone will hate me for saying this, but I had never read Fellowship of the Ring before I saw the movie. I thought the movie was great, so I went and read the book.

      Holy crap is the book tedious. I can't believe anyone complained about the removal of Tom Bombadil as I found his character to be entirely annoying. I don't think it's an effect of being part of the MTV generation, either, as I've read and loved longer books, but wow. I have no idea why so many people enjoy reading about people travelling through fields and over rivers and through forests and fields and rivers and forests and fields ...

    20. Re:Not my cup of tea by khendron · · Score: 1

      Not about romance? The entire basis of the story is romance, though you have to read the Appendix A to find this out. The reason Aragorn battles Mordor and regains the throne of Gondor was so that he was worthy to be the husband of Arwen. Elrond told Aragorn that he would accept no less than the King of Gondor and Arnor for his daughter.

      The whole hobbit and ring thing is just a side story to the tale of Aragron and Arwen.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    21. Re:Not my cup of tea by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A movie can have many layers of "meaning," and still be a bad movie. Matrix Reloaded is, at best, a mediocre movie, whatever little philosophical widgets they tossed into it.

    22. Re:Not my cup of tea by Joey7F · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How about the ending? Neo stopped sentinels in "real life", meaning the real world ain't so real ;)

      Seriously, greatest movie ending ever...

      --Joey

    23. Re:Not my cup of tea by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1
      That's actually funny...the only time I was distracted from the story was when Liv Tyler makes her first appearance, accompanied by the whole bright shiny look-at-me aura thing. I remember thinking, and I quote:
      "She is not that hot."
      To each thier own, though.
      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    24. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody always says that about any movie that comes out that was made from a book. "OMG, the book was so much better. blah blah blah. I'm such an elitist bastard blah blah blah"

      While I see your point in regards to the LOTR trilogy, I can name one example right now where the movie blows compared to the book: The Power of One. The book was a fantastic story about a young boy's journey through life. The movie, well, sucked.

    25. Re:Not my cup of tea by BagOBones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I agree, It had philosophical ideas interrupted by 15min effect fests that did little to enhance the story. I think nearly every fight was 3 times to long. If you watch the first film then the second you really notice how long and boring these over the top scenes have gotten.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    26. Re:Not my cup of tea by Tmack · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Or was it just an EMP from the other ship? hmmmm such suspense!

      tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    27. Re:Not my cup of tea by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Yes, but even if he likes the extended version of FOTR, he shouldn't watch TTT. He will despise TTT, since it lacks the feel of autheticity that FOTR had, which is exactly what he thought it was lacking. I hope that RotK picks things back up.

    28. Re:Not my cup of tea by slipstick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't try to fit the book into the film, you create a screen-play from the book. It is a "based on" type of thing. It is entirely possible to create a film that is as good or better than a book if you do it right.

      Now having said that I was slightly disappointed with the way the films have portrayed the main point of the book, e.g. the destroying of evil to preserve good. Don't get me wrong I loved the films but they have lost a certain element that really comes through in the narrative of the books. Basically the films are much more dark than the books are. As dire as the book seems some times there always seems to be a chapter thrown in of happiness to reenforce just exactly what they are fighting for.

      This didn't have to happen. Peter Jackson has done a great job of special effects and making this in to a great action flick but he lost some of the feeling and it was sooooo easy to fix. Instead of starting "The Fellowship of the Ring" with the story of the ring it should have started as the book did, Bilbo's birthday party. You can easily fill in the audience when Gandalf finds out exactly what the ring is. In fact this leaves some suspense for 1/2 hour while the audience is settling in and enjoying the scenery. Than when Gandalf comes back and tells Frodo the story you could have inserted the action sequence from the beginning of the film using Gandalf's voice for the voice over which would have lent more "harshness" to it.

      For as great as the books are, and I absolutely love them, they still come down to good vs evil and we all know how that will end we just don't know the details. The point is to make those who don't know anything about the books to fall in love with the simplicity and naivety of the Shire(recalling childhood), the majesty of the elves(the ability to believe that there are benevolent "gods"), the incredible variety and wonder of nature(the absolute silliness but child like qualities of Tom Bombadil, Gandalf's friendship with Shadowfax, Legolas falling in love with Fanghorn, Gimli falling in love with Helm's deep). The idea that man is soooo small in compared to the age of the universe or even the earth, e.g. the Ents are Old beyond imagining but this doesn't come through.

      Almost all of this went missing from the films.

      And last but not least, how dare anyone but the King of Gondor touch the sword of Isildir! That was simply unneeded, sure it doesn't mean anything to a person who hasn't read the books but for those who have, that incident alone should make them question Jackson's real commitment to the character of the books. Hell, once again there was simply NO NEED FOR IT. Why didn't Aragorn have the sword when Frodo met him just like in the book? There's no need to explain in detail as the book did. It is the thing that makes Frodo "recognize" Aragorn and that's easily done in a line or two or three.

      Anyway, enough analysis, suffice it to say that I think the books are great the films in their own way are great but that they miss the character of the book for no good reason.

      --
      Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
    29. Re:Not my cup of tea by Theory+of+Everything · · Score: 0

      I know that I'm probably going to get flamed by the /. faithful...

      You're right.

    30. Re:Not my cup of tea by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but the extended version of Two Towers hasn't been released yet, right?

      You are correct. The BS meter pegged when I got to that phrase.

    31. Re:Not my cup of tea by armyofone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh - I saw the original [twitch] Halloween on acid when it came out in theaters. Big mistake. That movie [twitch] is imprinted on my mind for all eternity. Why, oh why didn't I choose [twitch] to see Animal House or the animated LotR instead?

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    32. Re:Not my cup of tea by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      I know that I'm probably going to get flamed by the /. faithful but I really did not enjoy the first LOTR film and decided to not bother with the rest of the trilogy. I couldn't imagine the tedium of sitting through an extended version.

      You should definately give The Two Towers a chance. I felt the same way you did after watching the first one. It just got old real quick. The group is on the road, they find themselves in danger, they fend off the danger, repeat, repeat, repeat until the end of the movie.

      I had never read the books but I went ahead and saw Two Towers because I thought that there had to be something more to this series.

      I'm so glad I did! I thought the second one was great. The action starts as the movie begins and it really doesn't let up for most of the movie. I saw it three times and can't wait for the extended edition DVD. I thought the second one succeeded where the first one failed. Namely, as the three hours went by I never once was bored or looked down at my watch. I also thought the ending was a little more satisfying. The way the first one ended, I was like, "What .. that's it ... all this time for that ending" but I was much more satisfied at the ending of the second. There was more of cliff hanger (especially with Gollum) that made me excited to see what happens in the third.

      I went out and bought the extended edition of the Fellowship just so I can have the complete trilogy but I'm pretty sure that in the future when I watch the movies I'll just skip it. For me the fun with this series begins with the second film.

    33. Re:Not my cup of tea by killmenow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm sorry...

      "To be continued..."

      Greatest movie ending ever? How many movies have you actually *seen*? The matrix reloaded would have been much better had the directer/producer/editor/somebody with some sense ended it 30 seconds sooner. I can't express well enough my utter disdain for that ending. What are we, morons? We have to be fed that crap at the end? For all it's ups & downs, I enjoyed the movie...but seriously, that last 30 seconds just completely ruined it. They could have just cut it after Neo stopped the sentinals...or at least after showing him on the table.

      Everything after that was just explaining things for the *slow* members of the audience.

    34. Re:Not my cup of tea by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      They could have cut out her speaking parts entirely, and just lent her face. I found her nasal whisper-voice extremely grating the entire time, especially when it was digitally echoed.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    35. Re:Not my cup of tea by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
      Books and movies are different art forms.

      You can't say, "that book would make a good movie," it's like saying, "Hey, that painting would make a really good song." Yeah, one can inspire the other (a song inspired by Starry Night would sound much different than one inspired by The Screamer, for example), but they are not remotely "the same."

      I'll eaborate, for those who are thinking, "But books have characters, and so do movies! And plots!" Let's look at the two I already mentioned because most people are familiar with them. Starry Night, from a composers view, might have lots of short, repetitious legato passages in the flutes (the sky, mostly blue), with occasional staccato interrupts by the violins (the stars, pinpoints of white and yellow). The woods and water would have to be much darker, maybe a bass or oboe playing something slow and understated. The city would have to be more structured and upright, probably represented by persussion, maybe a piano, maybe tympani. The ground serves as backup to the stars, and the whole work might sound a little abstract, there is no focus in the painting.

      Screamer, on the other hand, is much darker. No flutes, that's for sure. Violins, playing minor scales to heighten the sense of fear; occasional pezzicato work above the bridge for that crawly sound Berlioze was so good at, to represent the tingles of fear the screamer is feeling. Low, dark sounds to represent whatever the screamer is so scared of. These low, dark sounds (maybe bassoons, tubas, cellos) play the melody-- because the subject of the painting is not the screamer, but whatever he is screaming at, which we can't see. So the low sounds carry the melody.

      So, screenwriters simply do this same thing, going from a book to a movie. Whew, maybe I should put the beer down now.

    36. Re:Not my cup of tea by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Actually, Chuck Palahniuk has said that the film version of Fight Club is better than the book. And he wrote the book.

    37. Re:Not my cup of tea by DroppedPacket · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      It was "To be concluded..." in the theater I went too.

      But it was still horribly lame. And the on top of that they had to had the bad TV season finale sting.

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    38. Re:Not my cup of tea by jafuser · · Score: 1

      "She is not that hot."

      Eek! *gasp*

      Maybe it's just my affinity for Middle Earth-based fantasy, but I can't think of any other character in modern motion pictures who is as hot as Liv Tyler as Arwen.

      What I really don't get are the freaks who think Trinity (Matrix) is hot...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    39. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally! Someone whom I agree with on these boring LOTR movies. There just arn't any compelling characters that are worth caring about. They say too few revealing things, and feel too little genuine emotion.

    40. Re:Not my cup of tea by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Its so lame when people throw this suggestion out there: first, Neo sensed the sentinals. How would you explain that? Second, are we to believe Neo just happened to gesture at precisely the same time as the EMP went off? Third, why would it incapacitate him? Face it, Neo did stop those sentinals. Basically the entire reason we're all going to see the next one is to see how.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    41. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would want Ralph Bakshi imprinted on your brain? For God's sake, man, why?

    42. Re:Not my cup of tea by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Frankly, my problem with the whole sword-incident was that Strider even handles a full sword besides Narsil. There was such implied power in a "ranger" who never actually needed a real sword [as evinced by the fact he never handles one, nor carries one, until his own true sword is reforged]. Jackson, despite creating a beautiful and great series, lost a few points from me when he robbed Aragorn of that quiet dignity.

      Speaking of robbing of dignity, who's seen the trailer for that god-awful movie Viggo is doing next? Some stupid horse race across the desert with bleached blond hair? Come on....

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    43. Re:Not my cup of tea by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Actually, he only said the ending of the movie is better than the book. That said, and considering the fact that I loved Lullaby when I read it months ago (got it in paperback in Aus. before it came out here), I think Palahniuk is a bit overrated. He basically just whines about some aspect of society over and over again, mixing it with some surreal violence and grotesquery (in Fight Club, its immasculation; in Lullaby its the fear of silence; in Invisible Monsters its our obsession with beauty, etc.).

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    44. Re:Not my cup of tea by slipstick · · Score: 1

      yup. I agree fully. I could have gone into more detail and probably described how to fix it but I already wasted enough bandwidth.

      The extended version makes it a little better but not much. In fact I missed the comment about "the elves having the power to reforge the sword that was broken" the first couple of times I watched it. There is mystery, a quiet dignity that you mention and the hint of unseen power that is missing from the Aragorn of the film that comes through entirely in the books.

      --
      Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
    45. Re:Not my cup of tea by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the support, but just one small thing. The next time I wade into the masses of /. and say something like "Star Wars sucks" and you come to back me up... how about dropping the Anonymous Coward? :-)

      But seriously, thanks, I knew I wasn't alone.

      John.

    46. Re:Not my cup of tea by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      the only time I was distracted from the story was when Liv Tyler makes her first appearance, accompanied by the whole bright shiny look-at-me aura thing

      In other words, like all geeks, it was the "Oooh, shiny" phenomenon.

      Goblin
      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    47. Re:Not my cup of tea by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      But "boring" is too much the result of either too little imagination, sleepiness/depression, or misunderstanding.

      A friend of mine said they didn't like it. They then said, they were pretty drunk when they saw it. You then take into account being driven to the theatre, getting tickets, snacks, watchign previews. About half way through the movie the alchohol should be making the person real tired. I suggested seeing it again sometime, sober, and with a good nights sleep.

      Dastardly

    48. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago, I was invited by a friend of mine (Ray) to see this sci-fi film which I had heard of, but but had never seen. The film was the original Russian version of Solaris (subtitles, 3+ hours and all). He was the lab tech in our school's graphics lab which featured a projector, etc.

      He kept saying, over and over, how it was the greatest film he had ever seen, how mind-blowing it was, etc. etc. As he was a pretty cool guy in general, everyone took him at his word and showed up on campus at the appointed time, 8:30pm, friday night. The show was supposed to start at 9pm. Here is the sequence of events:

      8:30pm everyone shows up, but no Ray.
      9pm Ray shows up. Asks, "Who brought the movie?"
      9:30pm Ray gets back from the video store. Asks, "Do we have any way to play a VHS tape?" Goes back to video store.
      10:15pm Ray (with escorts this time) returns with DVD version, and a bunch of microwave popcorn. Asks, "Does anyone have a key to the staff lounge so we can use the microwave? We HAVE to have popcorn!"
      10:45pm Some of us are losing hope. The popcorn is finally popped, and the movie starts. No sound.
      11:15 The disconnected cable in the audio system is found and reconnected. The movie actually begins.

      I won't really attempt in this forum to describe the film. Suffice it to say that it contains vastly more talking than doing, and the talking is all in Russian. It goes back and forth from black and white to color film. At one point, for no discernable reason, a dwarf bolts from an open door on this supposedly empty space station, and is quickly subdued. The incident is not commented upon, explained or, in fact ever mentioned again by the two people on the station. The film is also (as far as I can remember) far more than 3 hours long.

      1:15 I suddenly regain consciousness, to discover that all but 2-3 of the 15 people there are snoring loudly. the snoring is nearly as loud as the film. I struggle to stay awake for the rest of the film.

      3:45 or so in the morning
      The glare of the lights going up wakes most of the people "watching" the movie. We, as one, stumble up to Ray and just stare at him, hoping for some explanation to issue forth, something that would explain what we had just gone through. Something that would make it ok.

      The only thing he had to say? "Man, that wasn't nearly as good as I remembered it. It was WAY better when I was on Extasy! I swear!"

      No one who was there spoke to him again for over a month.

      W-

    49. Re:Not my cup of tea by harley_frog · · Score: 1
      One thing to consider that is often overlooked: LOTR (the book) was originally intended to be released as one continous book, but the publisher didn't think anyone would read a 1000+ page book. (By that token, they would have never published "Programming Perl" or any Russian novels, either.) So, it could be easily said that FOTR and TTT are merely two parts to a much larger movie.

      I have read both the book and watched both movies and enjoyed both versions. True, much was altered going from print to screen, but that is inevitable with such a deep and rich work. The same could be said of such movies as "Anna Karinina", "The Brothers Karamazov", "War and Peace", and "Gone With the Wind". (Funny how I picked three Russian novels, eh?) Of course not everyone is going to enjoy the same movie, book, etc. Heck, I think any film version of "Anna Karinina" pales in comparison to the staring Greta Garbo, but that's just me. I also think that time will be the true test of how well the film version of LOTR will fair.

      Of course, your milage (and opinions) may vary.

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
    50. Re:Not my cup of tea by satanami69 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its so lame when people throw this suggestion out there: first, Neo sensed the sentinals. How would you explain that?

      1) The alarms in the ship went off, telling them the sentinals are coming. I sensed them from my seat.

      Second, are we to believe Neo just happened to gesture at precisely the same time as the EMP went off?

      2) I've seen the nice DVD AC3 release, and yes, it does happen at the same time, from the same direction as the ship's EMP entrance.

      Third, why would it incapacitate him?

      3) Bane(the guy Agent Smith took over) was also knocked out by the EMP blast. I can only guess that they both share the same quality.

      Face it, Neo did stop those sentinals. Basically the entire reason we're all going to see the next one is to see how.

      That is the point of a cliffhanger and a conclusion.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    51. Re:Not my cup of tea by geekoid · · Score: 1

      FLAMEITY-FLAME-FLAME.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    52. Re:Not my cup of tea by thynk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kind of stands out in my mind that Neo neglected to wear his ESD shoes and wrist strap.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    53. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Aragorn risked the safety and freedom of the entire kingdom of Gondor *over a chick?!?!*

      If I were a subject of Gondor, I'd be calling for his lynching.

    54. Re:Not my cup of tea by Mechamse · · Score: 1

      Well time for me to drop my 2 cents...

      [Rant on]
      When the first LOTR-FOTR came out I was ecstatic. I loved the books and loved the first movie. The second movie made me very angry though. I'm not one to disagree with personal interpretation, but to change the story line to suit your own agenda is totally wrong. From the books, Tolkien was aiming to show the world through the eyes of the Hobbits, not the eyes of man. What would be the point? I can't say that the whole movie disgusted me, but in general, I was very disappointed.
      Changing Faramir into Boromir and then Theoden King into this simpering coward were not good. Neither was changing the hiding location for the people of Edoras. Only the farmers and outliers were at Helms Deep. And what happened to the Ents bring the trees to the rescue of Helms deep. It's almost like Jackson is trying to cut the fantasy down to a minimum. I want to see the Angry Ents (name eludes me, but they were the Ents that had grown still; the trees that you could feel anger from). I want to see Quicksilver get mad about loosing his groves. I want to see Theoden as a man of power after he is awoken from Saruman's magic. What is wrong with that? I don't want to see Liv Tyler and Viggo Mortensen love story. I would like to see the dinner scene from Fellowship (the book) where Arwen is seated nearly naked at the table. That would have been nice. But not the pout love sick Arwen that is brought to us in the first two films.
      I think that Peter Jackson could have created a perfect Epic saga that portrayed the story that Tolkien created long ago. Unfortunately he has instead tried to add "crap" into a great Story that needed nothing changed. Yes, I know about length of film, but as we have seen just from this posting alone, that is not something that the fans really care about. We will sit though a 4-hour movie if it is good enough to keep us there. I would sleep, and practically live in the theater to watch all 3 in a row if they were the way they were supposed to be. But not now. I admit, I will still see the ROTK just to see if Jackson has redeemed himself, but I will not be watching the 3-movie release.
      [Rant off]

    55. Re:Not my cup of tea by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Besides, Liv Tyler was NOT the right person to cast for Arwen. I mean, come on...she might as well have phoned in that performance. It was that lifeless and dull.

      I say Bjork should have been cast as Arwen. It might have meant some more interesting music on the soundtrack too...I mean Enya? Give me a fsckn break! Also, Bjork wouldn't have had to cultivate some fakey accent. The Elvish accent they were using sounded Scandinavian...her own Icelandic accent would have been perfect.

      Then again, every red-blooded male geek on Slashdot would have preferred Natalie Portman as Arwen. Right??? ^_^

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    56. Re:Not my cup of tea by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Seriously, greatest movie ending ever...

      Oh, Elvis J. Christ, no. Try these on for size:

      "rosebud . . ."

      "This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship."

    57. Re:Not my cup of tea by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      "The alarms in the ship went off, telling them the sentinals are coming. I sensed them from my seat."

      This is my fault, I misspoke. I meant to say that Neo sensed something different about the world, not to say that he sensed the sentinals coming. My mistake. However, the point stands: what was "different" that Neo was sensing, if not something along the lines of reality's lack of...well...reality?

      "2) I've seen the nice DVD AC3 release, and yes, it does happen at the same time, from the same direction as the ship's EMP entrance."

      I think you missed my point. I was mentioning the synchronous timing of his gesture and their incapacitation so as to illustrate the unliklihood of those events coincidentally occuring at the same time.

      "3) Bane(the guy Agent Smith took over) was also knocked out by the EMP blast. I can only guess that they both share the same quality."

      Note the time between when the Sentinals drop and when Neo drops. Since they were instantly incapacitated, shouldn't Neo have been too?

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    58. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same thing happened to me and jerry mcguire. but unfortunately i decided to see it again.

    59. Re:Not my cup of tea by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I'm in the same boat as you. I just bought the Lord of the Rings books back in January. Four books, The Hobbit plus FoTR, TTT, RoTK. I had seen an animated version of the Hobbit way back when I was in 2nd Grade, but never read any of the books until this year.

      And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that the books can be very tedious at times. All the travelling, and the silly songs and poems, some of which are pretty bad if you ask me, but then again I'm not into poetry.

      I finished TTT a few months ago, but haven't gotten to RoTK yet. I am noticing that there's a lot of dialog that was either omitted or just shorted in the movies, and I can't remember off hand, but there were some instances where some lines were spoken by one person in the book and someone else in the movie.

      Don't get me wrong though, I absolutely loved the movies. I even bought the soundtracks and have them on my iPod. The music is just so beautiful. Kind of like the way the original Star Wars series had great music (one thing that really annoys me about the new SW movies and all the friggin' video games, except KOTOR, is that they pretty much kept the exact same 25 year old music. "Duel of the Fates" was nice, but the rest of soundtracks for Ep 1 and 2 are utterly forgettable for the most part.)

      I digress...

      LoTR: Great music, great movies. Wish a few scenes weren't changed from the books (for instance Arwen saves Frodo when he's running from the Ringwraiths instead of the elf lord Glorfindel.)

      I'd love it if they'd release the extended versions of all 3 movies in a DVD set, but we'll probably have to wait a whole year for that.

    60. Re:Not my cup of tea by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      I like Peter Griffin's take on Citizen Kane...

      You see Orson Welles drop on his couch and whisper "rosebud".

      Peter tapes over the movie and says "It was the name of the sled he had as a kid...there I just saved you two long boobless hours!"

      --Joey

    61. Re:Not my cup of tea by Mechamse · · Score: 1

      Matrix reloaded:

      Did you all not watch that movie!?
      Come on! There are two Matrixes'... It's that simple. The Keeper as he was called was the first safety net for the first Matrix. Then the Sentinels and the world as it was to them were the protection of the second. Who is to say how many there are in total or if there is only a few, or maybe just the two. And then, this could all be a test of 1 man. Neo as it was to see what the Human mind is capable of doing. I like to think that there is more to it, but that is what I cam up with. Personally, I think that the end will be rather simple, like the beginning. But then it may be rather explosive and action packed too.
      But I think that the Titles actually give it away...
      Reloaded: 1st matrix is brought down. Reloaded is into the sub-Matrix
      Revolutions: What else, Revolutions from within the Matrix to break out. Or what ever they decide it to mean...

      Whatever it is, I will be watching it for sure, I can tell you that.

    62. Re:Not my cup of tea by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      About the "not seeing it again" part: That's a good plan. Trust me, you *really* want to stick with that plan. I saw Titan A.E. stone cold sober, and I can assure you it is not a great flick. Whatever "Xanadu"s you saw in your head, you should be eternally thankful for them and leave it at that.

      Of course, that's not to say that it was the *worst* movie I've ever seen either. It wasn't *that* bad it just wasn't that good. I could go into detail but I don't want to wreck it for you.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    63. Re:Not my cup of tea by Snaller · · Score: 1

      However, if your main criticism is "it was boring" then you really need to re-evaluate the film. If the acting were bad, the plot simple and the effects horrible, then you can say it was a bad movie. But "boring" is too much the result of either too little imagination, sleepiness/depression, or misunderstanding.

      Or it was simply boring. Tastes differ.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    64. Re:Not my cup of tea by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      A no-brainer. Obviously, the Matrix is embedded within another Matrix ... and that within another and another and ... Which leads to the Buddhist view that all reality is an illusion. Just another allegory. Though, if that is the case it should make for a really cool fight between Neo and Smith in the "real" world, maybe they switch bodies to highlight the ephemeral nature of "self" or something. I'll be disappointed if the movie doesn't try to seriously mess with my head.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    65. Re:Not my cup of tea by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      1. There was no EMP; the Hammer arrived too quickly. The EMP blast would have fried the ship.

      2. Neo did not stop the Sentinels; the Sentinels stopped (or did something to) Neo. Those Sentinels were not there to destroy Neo, but they were there to extract "the one" and carry him... somewhere... So here's the problem: how does Neo get back to his body?

    66. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone with my line of thinking :)

    67. Re:Not my cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Meta philosophical discussions about a movie lacking all qualities of a good one is at best pointless, in this case also offtopic.

      Thank you, drive through.

    68. Re:Not my cup of tea by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      What I really don't get are the freaks who think Trinity (Matrix) is hot...

      T&A in tight leather. Anymore questions? :)

    69. Re:Not my cup of tea by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      For as great as the books are, and I absolutely love them, they still come down to good vs evil and we all know how that will end we just don't know the details. The point is to make those who don't know anything about the books to fall in love with the simplicity and naivety of the Shire(recalling childhood), the majesty of the elves(the ability to believe that there are benevolent "gods"), the incredible variety and wonder of nature(the absolute silliness but child like qualities of Tom Bombadil, Gandalf's friendship with Shadowfax, Legolas falling in love with Fanghorn, Gimli falling in love with Helm's deep). The idea that man is soooo small in compared to the age of the universe or even the earth, e.g. the Ents are Old beyond imagining but this doesn't come through. Almost all of this went missing from the films.
      You can only fit so much into a 3 hour movie. I think the childish nature of the Shire came across pretty well...the arrogance of the elves certainly got across too. I must say, I hate Bombadill and glad he was excluded. Tho, one of my favorite "details" that was included in the movie was the growing friendship/banter between Legolas and Gimbli. They did a good job developing that.
    70. Re:Not my cup of tea by stewate4 · · Score: 1

      Well, I think you probably have to see the extended version of The Two Towers to really judge the film. Just as the extended version of The Fellowship addressed a lot of the issues I had with the theatrical version I expect much the same from the extra 43 minutes in the extended The Two Towers. For example, you mention the 'Angry Ents', well from what I've read about it the Huorns are in the extended version, and who knows how Faramir's or Theoden's characters will be fleshed out. Personally I think the only thing that would be difficult to turn around will be Treebeard and the Ents, the film seemed to equate them being slow to act with them being stupid. You would think they'd notice their forest was being cut down without the Hobbits 'tricking' them into finding out.

  4. Any Idea by corgicorgi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone has clue to what scenes will be added to the extend version of TTT?

    1. Re:Any Idea by jmays · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out this Slashdot article.

      --
      KARMA TAG! You're it.
    2. Re:Any Idea by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

      A bunch of computer generated shit and special effects, nothing that will enhance or enrich the plot or add anything meaningful to the movie. At least thats how it usually goes.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Any Idea by soundofthemoon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't heard anything, but you might want to check out http://theonering.net/ - they are a good place for LOTR rumors etc.

      Personally, I'm hoping to see a bit more character development of Eomer. All that got lost in the theatrical release.

    4. Re:Any Idea by EvanED · · Score: 4, Informative

      You obviously missed the Fellowship expanded version then; the new scenes *greatly* enhanced the storyline, especially for someone who hadn't read the books.

    5. Re:Any Idea by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Such as?

      Maybe I'm just jaded by Lucases new and improved Star Wars trilogy. Superimposing a couple of fancy spaceships in the background didnt improve anything.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Any Idea by theefer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know, but I had the chance to see (and got my book signed by ;-)) John Howe in Geneva earlier this year. Well amongst an awful lot of interesting things, he said he had seen (all or part of?) the new scenes that would form the extended version, and he totally loved it. He added they really pushed the movie to a new standard, even making it look like a new movie. The new footages is 42 minutes long.

      Besides this, he addressed interesting issues (people could ask questions) like the presence of Elves in Helm's Deep and such other things. He answered really calmly and smartly, with precise and interesting arguments.

      I really doubt PJ could even manage to do a bad movie with RotK after having seen the two other ones, but I can't wait to find out. And I'm sure I'm not alone in this.

      --
      theefer
    7. Re:Any Idea by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right about Star Wars, but the additions to Fellowship were nothing like that. It's been a while since I saw the film and even longer since the theatrical release, so I googled for a list of the added scenes. This was the closest thing I found: http://www.theonering.net/perl/newsview/2/10318586 89

      I'd say in general, there's just more background information. Like Bilbo writes at the beginning (and reads what he's writing in the film like a narration) some background information on Hobbits and their habits and stuff, there's some more background on Aragorn and Arwyn, there's scenes of the Lady Galadrial giving gifts to the fellowship. For those who haven't read the books, the background makes many things clearer (though another watching certainly didn't hurt), while for those who have (of which I now have), it provides many scenes that were notably missing (like the gift scenes).

    8. Re:Any Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I felt the Ents scene was a bit rushed, hopefully they'll extend that. :-)

    9. Re:Any Idea by EvilNight · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those too lazy to click a few links. ;)

      - Extended opening, in which the hobbits scale a cliff face using the rope Galadriel gave Sam, including a better build-up to the arrival of Gollum.

      - More friction between the Uruk-Hai and the Orcs as they transport Merry and Pippin back to Isengard, which better sets up the fight over food that takes place later.

      - More scenes of Saruman breeding his army, creating better pacing as the invasion of Rohan begins

      - Terrific scene in which Eomer finds the body of Theodred, Theodens son.

      - Additional scenes with Merry and Pippin, including extensions to existing Treebeard scenes and the Ent Draught sequence, in which the hobbits grow. In another scene, Treebeards soporific poetry works its magic.

      - Theodreds funeral scene, with Eowyn singing a lament.

      - A wonderful introduction to Aragorns horse Brego, who we learn was Theodreds horse. Aragorn requests Brego be set free, which places his later rescue in better context.

      - Additional scenes between Eowyn and Aragorn, including one in which he attempts to eat a bowl of evil-looking stew.

      - More scenes between Gandalf, Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli, which expand upon the films politics (including the union between the two towers Gandalf scene from the trailer, though that line is missing from what I can remember).

      - More of Sarumans musings, setting up themes that will be explored in The Return of the King.

      - Flashback to the circumstances surrounding Boromir being sent to Rivendell for the Council of Elrond, taking place during the re-taking of Osgiliath by the Gondorian army. This sequence briefly introduces John Noble as Denethor, a major character in The Return of the King. I was worried this sequence would seem like an indulgence, but its difficult to imagine the film without it; not only is the character of Faramir, much maligned by fans of the book, given added depth, so too is Boromir enriched by this addition.

      - Just before the Ents storming of Isengard, the Huorns mobilise and leave to attend to business elsewhere; they reappear at Helms Deep to kill the Uruk-Hai as they flee.

      - New ending, with Merry and Pippin finding a larder at Isengard, including two barrels of pipe-weed; a hilarious scene in which Gimli and Legolas compare their scores after the battle of Helms Deep; Frodo, Sam and Gollum are shown the way out of Osgiliath by Faramir, who threatens Gollum; theres even a brief moment in which Sam and Gollum appear to make peace.

      - Along with all these major additions, many more scenes are subtly extended to give more information or reinforce themes already present.

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
    10. Re:Any Idea by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      You obviously missed the Fellowship expanded version then; the new scenes *greatly* enhanced the storyline, especially for someone who hadn't read the books.

      From my point of view, especially for someone who *has* read the books. Many of the extra scenes bring the movie closer to the book in feeling, in my opinion.

      I'm just hoping the extended release for TTT will do likewise. The liberties they took with the story in that film were hard to bear.

    11. Re:Any Idea by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between adding stuff after the fact and editing a movie in a different, slightly longer way.

      The extra stuff in the extended FOTR was already done, just cut from the theatrical release for time considerations.

      Chris

    12. Re:Any Idea by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      No, but LOTR extended edition doesn't superimpose spaceships in the background. Seriously, you should at least check what the extended edition offers before you give pessimistic remarks.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  5. One Gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One gimmick to rule them all, one gimmick to find them one gimmick to bring them all and in the darkness bind them. Here is a mirror for the link in the article.

  6. God by govtcheez · · Score: 4, Funny

    As if most slashdot members didn't have a bad enough case of office ass...

    1. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too funny... (as I stuff a donut in my pie whole!) ;p

  7. woods by noah_fense · · Score: 1, Funny


    Great, 30 more minutes of them running through the woods. On two DVDs with millions of features i'll never even consider watching.

    -n

    1. Re:woods by Nostrada · · Score: 1

      No idea why this was modded funny, but the additional features on the DVD were actually really interesting. the insights in how the movie was created were well put together and I watched them all, even so I have normally the same attitude you have towards these add-ons.

      --
      Cheers, Nostrada
  8. One question... by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    When are they planning to show RotK in it's extended version?

    1. Re:One question... by radixvir · · Score: 1

      after people have purchased the regular version on dvd. seems like alot of films have stuff cut out just to put on the dvd

    2. Re:One question... by Cromac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably Nov 2004, right around when they're likely to release the extended version on DVD...3 months after the theatrical version on DVD...10 months after it first hits the threaters.

  9. Slashdotted already by Chaltek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before any king can return, New Line Cinema will re-release of the first two "Lord of the Rings" pics worldwide, this time with additional scenes and footage added.

    Just two weeks before the Dec. 17 release of "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" -- the final installment of the Peter Jackson-helmed epic trilogy -- the first two "Ring" entries will be unspooling worldwide.

    In memoranda sent to exhibitors on Wednesday, New Line laid out a game plan to promote the third film by refreshing filmgoers' memories with "The Fellowship of the Ring" and "The Two Towers."

    Plan calls for putting the films on 100-150 screens in top 10 U.S. markets. Many other U.S. cities will have one cinema participating in the special extended edition screenings. Running times for the extended editions are 208 minutes for "Fellowship of the Ring" and 214 minutes for "The Two Towers."

    Advanced ticket sales are scheduled to begin in late September or early October on exhibitor Web sites and movie ticketing sites like Fandango, MovieFone and Movietickets.com.

    "The release of the third film affords us a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to give audiences a compelling new theatrical experience of Peter Jackson's sprawling vision for this trilogy," said Rolf Mittweg, prexy and chief operating officer for worldwide distribution and marketing.

    The cost, one New Line insider estimated, will be between $10 million and $15 million. Due to the extended length of the new prints, the move is being cast as a promotional tool rather than a moneymaker.

    "It is important to note," the memo says, "that these events are produced as a marketing/publicity stunt and not as a revenue generating opportunity" and that media support will be limited largely to the Internet and participating theaters.

    Starting the week of Dec. 5, the extended DVD cut of "Fellowship of the Ring" will be released in some 100 or so theaters in the U.S. and in 20 theaters in Canada.

    Then, the week of Dec. 12, sequel "Two Towers" will unspool, just a month after having preemed on DVD, leading up to a worldwide Dec. 16 daylong marathon, during which all three films will be shown back-to-back. Exhib guidelines call for a 3 p.m. showing of "Fellowship" followed by a 7 p.m. screening of "Two Towers" and then an 11 p.m. screening of "Return of the King," which will carry over into Dec. 17 -- the day of its global release.

    Overseas, it's not yet clear whether all exhibs will be showing the new footage-added prints of the previous "Rings" pics. According to one New Line insider, the decision is being left to exhibs, which will make their requests known to New Line in the next few weeks.

    Italy and Japan will not immediately be included in the foreign promotional blitz. Italo comedies dominate that country around the holidays, and corporate sibling Warner Bros. will be carpeting Japan with the next "Harry Potter" pic. Triad of "Rings" pics will instead screen in January in Italy and February in Japan.

    "King" is produced by Barrie M. Osborne, Fran Walsh and Jackson, with a screenplay by Walsh & Philippa Boyens and Jackson, based on the book by J.R.R. Tolkien.

    1. Re:Slashdotted already by Nomen · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's no longer slashdotted - so if people feel like reading the article on our site, at least we'll get some advertising revenue to pay for the rest of the /.ing bandwidth.... - co-sysadmin of TORn

    2. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, this is /. we're not here to read "free" articles on websites supporting themselves with the faulty business model of advertising.

    3. Re:Slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fuck you, capitalist pig! No stinking ads for us stinky slashdotters! It's FREE FREE FREE!

      Viva La OpenSores Revolution!!!

    4. Re:Slashdotted already by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      I just have to say...New Line is doing a brilliant job with these movies. The whole thing with not having any extras on the standard issue DVD repeated on the extended edition was wonderful, and a major departure from the usual "grease 'em up and bend 'em over" Hollywood mentality.

      But this tops it. They're not going to make a ton of money by releasing these films to the theaters. This is for the fans. And, this is going to be a gift to the theaters as well. Instead of the theater staff having to cope with a lobby filled with crazed fans (like myself) waiting to get the best seats all day long, they can have them safely in the theater, eating popcorn. No geeks in hobbit gear, or long-haired men weilding swords frightening the mundanes.

      Utterly brilliant. Whoever came up with the marketing plan for these films should be promoted to CEO of Time-Warner ASAP.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  10. Call me a pawn of 'the man', but . . . by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Call me a pawn of 'the man', but I will be there in the theaters for both of them. The military-entertainment complex will thank me, but my bladder won't.

    Three and half hours... Why don't they have intermissions anymore?

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    1. Re:Call me a pawn of 'the man', but . . . by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Both of them? Try all three:

      Exhib guidelines call for a 3 p.m. showing of "Fellowship" followed by a 7 p.m. screening of "Two Towers" and then an 11 p.m. screening of "Return of the King," which will carry over into Dec. 17 -- the day of its global release.

    2. Re:Call me a pawn of 'the man', but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there still are intermissions, it just really depends on which theater you go to. A few years ago while I was in college I worked as manager for two different movie theaters. One mom & pop single screen theater, and one 15 screen multi-plex. When Titanic came out the small cinema decided to put an intermission in. Concession sales per person went up ~60%, but since the movie was so long, the overall sales for the day were still a little low since they could only show the movie 3 times a day instead of the normal 4 or 5.<BR><BR>
      In the big multi-plex they just throw the movie in 2 or 3 theaters and get more than enough showtimes. Concession sales don't really hurt because the extra theater or two that the long movie is in replaced some lame movie that didn't make any money anyway.<BR><BR> Of course this only works if the long movie is a blockbuster, which for some reason long movies generally do well.

  11. Theaters. by hirebrand · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just to be clear, these are being released in the theaters. Not on VHS / DVD, which was my immediate thought.

    Plan calls for putting the films on 100-150 screens in top 10 U.S. markets. Many other U.S. cities will have one cinema participating in the special extended edition screenings. Running times for the extended editions are 208 minutes for "Fellowship of the Ring" and 214 minutes for "The Two Towers."
    1. Re:Theaters. by IpsissimusMarr · · Score: 1

      Then, the week of Dec. 12, sequel "Two Towers" will unspool, just a month after having preemed on DVD,

      The extended version of FOTR has been out since last year, when I bought it, just before TTT was release. And again they will release last year's movie on extended DVD before showing ROTK.

      --
      "Engineers do the work of man, Physicists do the work of God"
  12. umm... by johnstein · · Score: 1, Interesting

    so when will it be safe to actually buy it? I was going to hold out for the final-super-duper-all-the-bells-and-whistles-mind- blowingly-awesome-final edition with all 3 movies with their respective bonus features.

    however, my old roommate, a huge PJ fan,(his pet name for peter jackson), told me that PJ doesn't drag out releasing the special editions and that I wouldn't have to worry about this.

    looks like my roommate was wrong. I feel like that guy in the progressive auto insurance commercial talking with a plumber as his house fills with water and worried that he might pay too much. I don't want to buy the movies twice, and I want the best version I can get. Is that so hard to ask for? Just release it ALL at once.... please?

    -John

    --
    "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    1. Re:umm... by johnstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps I should read the article a bit closer next time. I thought they were re-releasing the DVD's, not re-releasing in the theaters. But my gripes still remain. -John

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    2. Re:umm... by eclectric · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I woulnd't worry about this from Peter Jackson. They will finish the regular DVD edition of the RotK, and then the extended edition (though, these will probably come very quickly so PJ can concentrate on his next movie.

      At best, the movies may be packaged as one, or in a collection, but the cuts, commentary, and probably the features will not change.

    3. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In about 2012, when the 'Jesus Bastard Shit!!(tm)' version will be released including a 90 minute interview with the tea-boys tea-trolleys' left rear wheel oil-can cleaner.

    4. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this whole re-release with special features crap is a not-too-subtle way for the asshole MPAA to pry more money out of us. If they'd release both DVD editions at once we could choose which we wanted instead of them trying to squeeze us. Bastards.

    5. Re:umm... by stealthv · · Score: 1

      These are theatrical releases of the extended editions. Not new DVD releases. The extended edition for the first film is already on DVD. The extended version of the second film will be on DVD in November.

    6. Re:umm... by lacrymology.com · · Score: 1

      "however, my old roommate, a huge PJ fan,(his pet name for peter jackson), told me that PJ doesn't drag out releasing the special editions and that I wouldn't have to worry about this."

      Your friend is referring to the "Meet the Feebles" / "Dead Alive" PJ, not the mega-million-movie-maker Mr. LOTR PJ. -m

      --

      #
      # Modus Ponens
      #
  13. FoxTrot by ceswiedler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of an old Foxtrot cartoon....

    The sister asks her kid brother and his friend where they are going. They say they're going to watch 3 Star Wars movies. She says, "All three? back-to-back?" They reply, "No, all three...three times in a row."

    1. Re:FoxTrot by digitalsushi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      chah Paige was hot!

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:FoxTrot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it?

    3. Re:FoxTrot by Temporal · · Score: 1

      No, all three...three times in a row.

      Weak.

      Real Star Wars fans watch all three... simultaneously! Three screens!

      By that criteria, I'm not a real Star Wars fan, but I know someone who has done it, and she says it's really scary how well the scenes line up. Sort of like Wizard of Oz and that one CD (something by Pink Floyd, was it?).

    4. Re:FoxTrot by aliens · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes I recognize sigs much more often. I'd recognize names if they too were on the bottom of a person's comment.

      Perhaps this should be done?

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    5. Re:FoxTrot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is how it goes:

      Jason says he is going to see the extended edition of the Star Wars trilogy back to back to back. Then Peter says something like 6 hours is a long time to be in the theater. Jason then quips back no 18 hours, we are watching the entire trilogy back to back to back

    6. Re:FoxTrot by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Sort of like Wizard of Oz and that one CD (something by Pink Floyd, was it?).

      You're thinking of Dark Side of the Rainbow, the pairing of Wizard of Oz with Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon. Synchronize your DVD player and CD player such that the album begins on the third roar of the MGM lion and you'll see...
      Well, actually, you'll see that this works much better with illegal substances coursing through your veins. Watched sober, it doesn't really line up.
    7. Re:FoxTrot by prator · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, you'll see that this works much better with illegal substances coursing through your veins. Watched sober, it doesn't really line up.

      Actually, with Dark Side of the Moon playing and illegal substances coarsing through your veins, you'll probably be content to just stare at the wall.

      -prator

    8. Re:FoxTrot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they say they're going to watch Star Wars "back-to-back-to-back" "Don't you mean back-to-back?" "No, all three... three times in a row"

    9. Re:FoxTrot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO NO NO you have it all wrong! "Dark Side Of The Rainbow" has nothing to do with Pink Floyd's The Wall

  14. Will theaters be cooperating? by uiil · · Score: 1

    If they could get away with charging more for a longer movie, the theaters might be more willing to play extended versions.

    Or maybe bring back the intermission candy runs.

  15. Re:Extended... by uberdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um... No, they weren't. Not by a long shot. Of course, I'm a fan.

  16. My only... by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny
    Tricksters New Lines... they's trying to sell my precious again... we not likes them....

    My only... my precious...

    1. Re:My only... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, man, it's not the DVD/VHS they're re-releasing; they're putting the extended versions of the first two in the theaters before the new one comes out.

      So does this mean that a year from now the extended version of ROTK will be in the theaters? :)

  17. Math by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "The Trilogy as One"

    So where's the third DVD movie in a two movie DVD release? D'OH! Oh wait, it hasn't come out yet...

    boneheads...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:Math by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Sorry... Sorry...
      pretend I never typed that...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    2. Re:Math by jmays · · Score: 1

      RTFA.

      "leading up to a worldwide Dec. 16 daylong marathon, during which ALL THREE FILMS will be shown back-to-back. Exhib guidelines call for a 3 p.m. showing of "Fellowship" followed by a 7 p.m. screening of "Two Towers" and then an 11 p.m. screening of "Return of the King," which will carry over into Dec. 17 -- the day of its global release."

      --
      KARMA TAG! You're it.
    3. Re:Math by blitzoid · · Score: 1

      Hate to burst your bubble, but they're talking about re-releasing them in THEATERS so you can watch all three close together.

      --
      I am a filthy pirate.
  18. Hrm...did George Lucas help? by `Sean · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because this time, we really wanted a dozen walkers in the background and thousands of Ewoks scurrying around in the foreground!

    1. Re:Hrm...did George Lucas help? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      No!! What are you doings? You'll ruins it! Stupid fat hobbit!

    2. Re:Hrm...did George Lucas help? by PoisonousPhat · · Score: 1

      Just throw Spielberg in there and we can have all swords, bows and other weapons replaced by innoucuous, family-friendly items. What's the Middle Earth equivalent of a walkie-talkie?

      --
      Losers choose to abuse the use of "loose".
    3. Re:Hrm...did George Lucas help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the Middle Earth equivalent of a walkie-talkie?
      a Palantiri?
  19. Milking the Cow by netsharc · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, milk the moneycow till it drops dead. I'm sure Peter Jackson is not George Lucas, and the guilty party here is the New Line execs, but I hope it won't over-expose people to LotR. The title of the /. article had me expecting that they were going to release a 10 hour film, but I guess that would be too long, and the movies would make less profit. Instead they can make a 3 movie marathon and have everybody pay 3 times as much!

    Will Warner Bros. be doing the same for the Matrix Trilogy?

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Milking the Cow by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 1
      The cost, one New Line insider estimated, will be between $10 million and $15 million. Due to the extended length of the new prints, the move is being cast as a promotional tool rather than a moneymaker.

      Ah yes, those greedy bastards.

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    2. Re:Milking the Cow by dontspellsogood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So? New Line was forward thinking enough to take a leap of faith and let Jackson film all three at once (with obvious benefits to the viewers). Why not let them reap the rewards of their big millions gamble (it could have flopped. big.)

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
    3. Re:Milking the Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they made a good movie. Unlike Mr Lucas who has milked some people twice and a 3rd soon for their prequels to star wars.

    4. Re:Milking the Cow by fireduck · · Score: 4, Informative

      As the article points out, this is not meant to be an attempt to generate revenue, but merely a promotional tool.

      Releasing 3+ hour long movies in 3 successive weeks in few select theatres with little fanfaire (at least according to the article) doesn't sound like over-exposure. Sounds more like a treat for the fans.

      As for a 10 hour movie, while that certainly would be interesting, it would a) involve lots of work by jackson et al. to interweave the films (rather than simply playing back to back) and b) would be expensive as hell. (as two sets of different prints would have to be sent out to the theatres, depending if they were showing ROTK or the entire trilogy movie, or both if they having two different sets.) and c) would be financially disasterous for the movie theaters. (as a 10 hour movie for the price of one, means they are losing admission on at least 2 to 4 films).

      As for other arguments regarding milking the cow, New Line and Jackson have ALL along stated that each DVD would be released as a theatrical and an extended edition. True fans who wanted both could buy both, others could pick which one to get. as I recall, there were even signs up at the stores (or stickers on the dvd) when FOTR came out reminding people that the extended version was still to be released.

    5. Re:Milking the Cow by hypnagogue · · Score: 1

      "Financially disasterous"?? Hardly. Movie theaters don't make revenue from tickets. They make revenue from concessions. And if you are trapped in a movie theater for 10 hours, they will reap a windfall. That's 2 or 3 meals per person at something like $12 per meal. Almost all profit.

      --
      Liberty you never use is liberty you lose.
    6. Re:Milking the Cow by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      " Ah yes, milk the moneycow till it drops dead."

      Why not? I wish they would release all the old great movies to the theaters every once in a while. Most of the old ones are better than the new ones, anyway. I'd rather them re-release something good than release a new sucky film.

      I don't understand our fascination with "new!", "new!", "new!" It just seems a waste. New stuff is great, but lets not get too far ahead of ourselves.

      "The title of the /. article had me expecting that they were going to release a 10 hour film, but I guess that would be too long, and the movies would make less profit. Instead they can make a 3 movie marathon and have everybody pay 3 times as much!"

      It really is amazing how well that works. I've heard a story about a guy who had a bike shop. He had two jars of ball bearings. One for 20c and another for 80c a bearing. He advertised his 20c price, because otherwise noone would come to his store if he only had 80c ball bearings. However, upon coming to the store, everyone would opt for the 80c ones, thinking them superior. Anyway, one day his assistant notified him that they were almost out of 80c bearings. The manager, doing what he always did, simply took some of the bearings from the 20c jar and added them to the 80c jar, since they were all the same bearing any way.

    7. Re:Milking the Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there was a promo for the extended edition *inside* the theatrical edition case. I knew about the extended edition from all the hype on the internet, but one of my friends bought the theatrical edition, opened it, and almost cried when he saw the extended edition advert.

  20. Yay! by blitzoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy shit I had dreamed about something like this happening.

    Months ago I had said to my friends "Since I can't do it in theaters, I'm gonna get all the extended DVDs when they come out and watch them in a row.". Now I CAN do it in theaters. Hurray.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
    1. Re:Yay! by drivers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes but the ROTK in theatres this year isn't going to be the extended version. I'd assume you'd have to wait 11 months or so to get the extended ROTK DVD.

    2. Re:Yay! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
      Yes but the ROTK in theatres this year isn't going to be the extended version.

      Party pooper!

  21. Re:1st post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the restaurant and the end of middle earth! That's a great book! I love Tolkien's trilogy in four parts!

  22. All in one? by mansa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've heard Tolkien originally wanted the three series into one large book. The title of this submission "The Trilogy as One" got me thinking. I wonder if they'll splice all three movies together when the next generation DVD comes out. Then you could take it all in as JRR intended. Sure, it'd be a marathon... but I think lots of geeks would dig it.

    1. Re:All in one? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are in one book! I bought it for my kid. It has the hobbit in it too, as a kind of a preface.

      It's about three feet thick, and the most awkward reading experience you'll ever have. I'd rather have a nice set.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:All in one? by kjawolf · · Score: 1

      It was my understanding that Fantasy as a Genre really took off when LOTR was first split into 3 separate novels.

    3. Re:All in one? by pocra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aye, he originally wanted at as one volume, divided (hexivided?) into six "books". As it is, it's usually found as three volumes, each containing two "books". Although the first volume (books i+ii) is pretty linear, the second and third volumes (books iii+iv and books v+vi) have each book largely covering the same time (one book Frodo + Sam's journey, the other book Merry + Pippin's journey). As such, splicing all three movies together into one ginormous movies still wouldn't be entirely faithful to the original story, if only because the films don't follow this structure. (Though it could be re-edited to make it fit). Nevertheless, one huge film would be way cool.

    4. Re:All in one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's why my addition of "Lord of the Rings" is a single huge book bound in red leather! Actually I have the 4 book (including the Hobbit) boxed set, the formentioned single bound addition and from my aunt a signed 3rd US printing of the Hobbit signed by J.R.R. Tolkine himself! She was able to have the great man sign it during his (one and only?) US book tour and left it to me in her will.

    5. Re:All in one? by Universal+Nerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As far as I can remember, (it's been a while) the original title was "The Fall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King".

      Sound familiar? It should be, it's the title of the Red Book that Frodo leaves with Sam at the Grey Havens.

      The sublty of this moment, slighty smudged by the fact that the book is divided in 3, is, to me, the greatest of the whole story... I was not reading a book written by J.R.R. Tolkien, I was reading a book started by Bilbo Baggins then by Frodo with Peregrin Took, Samwise Gamee and Meriadoc Brandybuck and later translated by Mr. Tolkien.

      I always shudder at that point in the story when, yet again, I realize that the story is a tale of a quest performed by the bold little people of the Shire.

      --
      Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul Ash nazg thrakatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
    6. Re:All in one? by dknight · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be just like watching the directors cut of Dune!

      (that's a poor attempt at humor, for those of you so-impaired)

    7. Re:All in one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah because playing those movies back to back to back would be so fucking hard. Especially with recent 5 disc DVD players being in the $100 range.

      Hell you could shove two DVDs of Family Guy on there while you're at it.

    8. Re:All in one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the whole thing about whether it's supposed to be three books or one or six is really a literary device. It's an issue of Tolkien pretending Bilbo wrote the book.

      Fictionally, Tokien found all of these books (including the Hobbit) and translated them, but they were written by Bilbo.

      In this fictional account, it was one book in 6 volumes. But in reality, it was always 3 books.

    9. Re:All in one? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul Ash nazg thrakatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.

      Ach! The language of Mordor! You shouldn't utter that here.

    10. Re:All in one? by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Love your sig!

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    11. Re:All in one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As far as I can remember, (it's been a while) the original title was "The Fall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King". Sound familiar? It should be, it's the title of the Red Book that Frodo leaves with Sam at the Grey Havens. The sublty of this moment, slighty smudged by the fact that the book is divided in 3, is, to me, the greatest of the whole story... I was not reading a book written by J.R.R. Tolkien, I was reading a book started by Bilbo Baggins then by Frodo with Peregrin Took, Samwise Gamee and Meriadoc Brandybuck and later translated by Mr. Tolkien.
      It's actually "The Downfall of the Lord of the Rings, and the Return of the King", translated from the Redbook of Westmarch. It's not really subtle if you read the appendices.
    12. Re:All in one? by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering why it the room got dark momentarily when that came up on the screen...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    13. Re:All in one? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      (glances conspiratorially around the room)... that's one reason why I haven't bought the DVD's yet. I saw the shows in the theater, friends have 'em on DVD, and I just *know* a really cool 'Master' boxed set will come in about a year or so after RofTK is out of theaters.

    14. Re:All in one? by babbage · · Score: 1
      I always shudder at that point in the story when, yet again, I realize that the story is a tale of a quest performed by the bold little people of the Shire.

      You went to one of those schools that skips over the difference between fiction & reality, didn't you?

      This twist is hardly new, and considering all the pseudo-myths that Tolkein crammed into his boredom-opus, I'd assume that anyone that read it saw it coming if they were thinking: of course Tolkein would have wanted to bring this pseudo-mythology to a higher level by wrapping the whole series under the cloak of pseudo-history. Quelle surprise.

      My favorite "I didn't write this, I just found it" is the novel version of "The Princess Bride", or as author William Goldman called it, The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure (The 'Good Parts' Version). The introduction (a large chunk of which is available via Amazon) writes about how when he was a kid his Florinese father used to read him the history by S. Morgenstern, and all his adult life he wanted to go back & reread his favorite childhood bedtime story but could never seem to find a copy. Eventually, after a long, difficult search, he turned up a copy in a little Manhattan rare books shop, brought it home, read it, ...and hated it. It turned out, he realized then, that his father had been reading him the "good parts" version of S. Morganstern's tome, and so he decided to republish that as the novel and, later movie: "The Princess Bride."

      I've long thought that Goldman was making fun of Tolkein here ;)

    15. Re:All in one? by babbage · · Score: 1
      The introduction (a large chunk of which is available via Amazon)

      Ahh, nevermind that, the whole thing is available, and in plain HTML at that. Here's the intro to the original, and here's the intro to the 25th anniversary edition.

      They're almost as entertaining as the PB itself :)

    16. Re:All in one? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Six parts would have served the movies well, each movie was twice as long as most others. A lot of movies run 90min to just over two hours, three hours and longer was severely trying my ability to sit still.

    17. Re:All in one? by mlush · · Score: 1
      I was reading a book started by Bilbo Baggins then by Frodo with Peregrin Took, Samwise Gamee and Meriadoc Brandybuck and later translated by Mr. Tolkien.

      I find that it is useful to watch the movies as if Peter Jackson had gone back to the original sources and done his own translation/research comming up with a alturnate interpretation of the events

    18. Re:All in one? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      I always shudder at that point in the story when, yet again, I realize that the story is a tale of a quest performed by the bold little people of the Shire.

      There is probably a draft - put on a sweater.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  23. I'm a smoker... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1, Funny

    I won't be going to the extended editions in the cinema.

    graspee

    1. Re:I'm a smoker... by crashnbur · · Score: 1
      I'll own the DVDs, and I'd rather throw a co-ed pizza/beer/LOTR party than sit in a theatre for ten hours. I don't think I'll be seeing them in theatres either.

      However, that 11:00 showing of Return of the King on December 16 is looking attractive...

    2. Re:I'm a smoker... by RandomWhiteMan · · Score: 1

      I'm a smoker too, but I plan to be there (assuming there is a theater close to me doing this) and watching with fellow smokers. It makes our ritual of standing outside the theater smoking and discussing the movie that much better.

      Now, if only I could get some of that shire weed Gandalf is always going on about...

    3. Re:I'm a smoker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will testify that nothing goes better with LOTR than a good smoke. I like to fire up the pipe right when I put the second disc in, as the Fellowship sets out from Rivendell. My smoke rings aren't as good as Gandalf's, admittedly.

  24. Re:1st post by theefer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw on TechTV that this trilogy will include features about the fourth book. Anybody catch the name?

    You mean The Revenge Of Sauron ? No, Peter Jackson clearly stated only the first three books would be part of his movie trilogy.

    --
    theefer
  25. Also announced... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The SUPER ULTRA EDITION of the entire trilogy in a 10-DVD set - coming Jan. 2004. $100

    The SUPER MEGA ULTRA PLATINUM EDITION of the entire edition, PLUS the cartoon movie, in a 20-DVD set - coming March 2004. $200

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:Also announced... by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      And of course the SUPER MEGA DAZZLING MITHRYL EDITION, complete with your very own mithryl t-shirt, for the astoundingly low price of half a kingdom!

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  26. Could someone answer me... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    ... exactly why do I even bother watching it when it first comes out?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  27. Bring a bedpan and pack a lunch by RumpRoast · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man that theatre is going to smell bad. Dec 16th = Smelly LOTR day.

    --

    My Ass hurts.
    1. Re:Bring a bedpan and pack a lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suddenly smells of my assembly class lab come to mind during final project week *shudder*

  28. LOTR - As good as mediocre can be.. by FileNotFound · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw both movies, because I see at least 80% of movies that come out purley out of boredom.

    Yet I must admit that I was quite excieted about LOTR, only to be disapointed.

    Maybe I expected too much, maybe I allowed myself to be a victim of the hype. Maybe it'd be better had I gone in expecting nothing like I did with Fight Club and come out feeling that I had just seen the best movie of the year if not the decade without expecting it.

    I am not saying that LOTR is bad, it certainly deserves an A+ for effort, for acting, for the effects and for the enviroment and atmosphere they managed to create.

    Yet with all that LOTR just feels hollow, something is missing. It just feels too much like an action flick. There was supposed to be something of an epic scale in LOTR, a great strugle, yet I don't think the movie is able to get that across.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:LOTR - As good as mediocre can be.. by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Which raises the valid question: Is there any way possible to make a movie of LOTR and make it as epic and great as the book?

      Frankly, I doubt it. Special effect are not anywhere near as good as my imagination, and actors never exactly the same as I imagine the characters acting when I'm reading something. Not to mention the movies would be 12 hours long each.

      I was happy with the first two movies, not because I was expecting to be as good as the books, but because I was hoping to see an a movie that made a good effort to portray the books.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:LOTR - As good as mediocre can be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crack ye be smoking.

    3. Re:LOTR - As good as mediocre can be.. by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder what it would take for you to think a movie needs to make it epic. I mean what do you want:

      *More Characers? (Try J. Austin)
      *More extras in huge crowd scenes that aren't CGI (Ten Commandments)
      *More vile villins? (Event Horizon?)
      *More battles (Jackie Chan / Jet Lee?)
      *Better acting (Schindler's List?)

      But it is way up there on all of those.

      May be I just have too low of expectations when it comes to entertaining movies.

      robi

  29. Sigh . . . by The_Mighty_Squid · · Score: 1

    There goes my paycheck that month.

    --
    -- No Comment
    1. Re:Sigh . . . by pokeyburro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Poor $27-per-month-earning bastard...

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
  30. a guess by prichardson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm going to take a wild guess and say that New Line is going to release the ultra mega super insane LOTR pack about a year after LOTR:ROTK comes out. I am waiting until then to buy the dvd. This dvd will contain all the full length movies and a huge stack of extras. They might even throw in a big full color map or something like that. It will probably be unbearable expensive, too.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:a guess by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      And we will quickly buy it, no matter what the cost, like the good LOTR geeks we are :)

      I know I have my regular and extended version of LOTR:FOTR, don't you?

    2. Re:a guess by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I am ready to fill the corporate coffers of New Line at their bidding.

      Sir, Yes Sir. May I please have another!

      robi

    3. Re:a guess by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      ok, how about this, I'll confirm your guess. I have it on good authority that NLC will do exactly what you have said. I have heard of a 16 DVD disk version talked about as long ago as a year ago April.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    4. Re:a guess by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

      When they sell all three movies together on DVD, I want them to throw in not just a map and some other extras, but an actual Ring of Power.

  31. I'm Ready... by eigerface · · Score: 0



    As soon as "The Return of the King" fades to the rental market and the entire trilogy is released in extended, one-disk, full-length viewing format, I'll be there with credit card in hand! Until then, BFD.

    1. Re:I'm Ready... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      There's no way you could put any of the extended cuts on one disc. Even to fit the theatrical cuts, you have to use extreme compression and drop the DTS track.

      I'd rather they split it up and get to see and hear it closer to the way it's supposed to be.

  32. Food? by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm NOT gonna survive on theater popcorn, hotdogs and mega-jumbo Cokes for 11 hours. I hope they have intermissions between the films so we can hit the mall food court...

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular belief, you can survive without stuffing your fat blowhole for days, let alone hours. Some call it fasting, and it can actually be good for you.

      Besides, RTFA. First movie at 3, second at 7. Thats 3 hours for the movie, an hour or so for you to shovel mcnuggets from the food court (which I'm sure you consider gourmet eatin) into your bloated face, and waddle your fat ass back to the cinema.

      Next movie is at 11, so you can repeat your ritual gorging.

      If I were you I'd be making sure they have seats to accomodate a man of your girth.

      Hey fatty, I got a movie for ya, "A Fridge Too Far"!!

      Naw I'm just funnin ya, yer alright.

    2. Re:Food? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
      And what of the OTHER end of the process. They're gonna need a LOT of porta-potties by the end of TTT.

      Either that, or take over the ladies rooms as well (g)

    3. Re:Food? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Either that, or take over the ladies rooms as well (g)

      It's not like anyone's going to be using it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Food? by sehryan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm NOT gonna survive on theater popcorn, hotdogs and mega-jumbo Cokes for 11 hours. I hope they have intermissions between the films so we can hit the mall food court...

      So you can pick up a greasy burger, salty fries, and a mega-jumbo coke instead?

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    5. Re:Food? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>Thats 3 hours for the movie, an hour or so for you to shovel mcnuggets from the food court

      The expanded editions are closer to 4 hr than 3... I think FotR is 3:40 or so.

    6. Re:Food? by maccw · · Score: 0

      not to mention the additional $200 you would have to spend.

      --
      My karma is getting better everyday.
    7. Re:Food? by Saeger · · Score: 1
      ROFL - thanks for the laugh Mr. AC.

      (And I agree, btw. I've learned to love that slight pang of hunger rather being a slave to it.)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    8. Re:Food? by betis70 · · Score: 1

      So you can pick up a greasy burger, salty fries, and a mega-jumbo coke instead?

      Well, but the burger will have some lettuce and ketchup on it. That counts as a vegetable, doesn't it?

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    9. Re:Food? by majcher · · Score: 1

      Or, you could go to a real theatre, like the Alamo Drafthouse here in Austin.

      Mmmm, beer.

  33. Will we see Tom? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Will old Tom Bombadil be in the extended versions?

    1. Re:Will we see Tom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's not in the extended cut, sorry.

    2. Re:Will we see Tom? by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1

      Only if Peter Jackson decides he hates us all, after all.

      Bombadil was boring and ridiculous, and I don't give a damn if Tolkien thought he was important; because he's completely extraneous to the primary story and a good cut from the film.

      --
      The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  34. Re:1st post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "The Lord of The Rings: Episode I: The Phantom Hobbit"

  35. What about flyover country? by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

    Living in fly over country, I have to ask, how many hundreds of miles will I have to drive to see this?

  36. I wish they would make a version... by smkndrkn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that portrayed faramir correctly. I can forgive all the other stuff they messed up in the two towers but the whole faramir business and taking the poor hobbit back to gondor just drives me crazy...kind of like Jar Jar did when I saw EP 1.

    Alas I'll still buy the videos.

    --
    ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    1. Re:I wish they would make a version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, try not to be such a goddamn fruit.

    2. Re:I wish they would make a version... by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 1

      No shit. That is the one egregious change that I cannot ignore -- especially the whole bit about hauling the hobbits back fifty or so miles. Cut out Tom Bombadil? Well, I guess it makes sense. Expand the Aragorn background and give Liv Tyler more screen time? Sure, it's one way you can actually improve over the books. Re-do the battle of Horns Deep for more suspense? They didn't really have to, but so what. Cut the ents back to a few minutes of screen time and make them cartooney? Well, I don't like it; but what you gonna do?

      But Faramir? The man was a pupil of Gandalf. A good part of the plot in ROTK is based around his disaffection from his father and the fact it goes way back. And on top of everything else the change added nothing to the story!

      Grump...

      --
      - -
      Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    3. Re:I wish they would make a version... by Arandir · · Score: 1

      If you actually bother to reread the book, you'll see that Faramir was indeed tempted by the ring, but in a different manner than Boromir.

      Taking the hobbits to osgiliath may have been a mistake, as was the casting of David Wenham (too wooden, IMHO), but portraying Faramir as a fallible human being was not.

      The scene shows the differences between Boromir and Faramir wonderfully. The ring played upon Boromir's ego (it should be mine) but it played on Faramir's duty instead (the ring will go to Gondor).

      p.s. Also notice was is seldom emphasized in the books: Boromir is a good and worthy person and not a two-dimensional Judas.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:I wish they would make a version... by slipstick · · Score: 1

      Sure Faramir was tempted but not nearly so strongly as to intice him to take Frodo to Gondor. It really wasn't called for and just wastes time better spent in developing each of the characters more fully. This goes with my whole theme that Jackson hasn't shown enough "good" in the films to make people really feel there is a reason to root for the good guys.

      Secondly I thought the books did a good job of showing the subtleness of Boromir and the evil of the ring in drawing a good man to his downfall.

      But at the same time, what's his name(sorry slips my memory) did an even better job in the movie. He was without a doubt the best actor in the LOTR, he played the part comendably, which doesn't surprise me as I had heard he did a lot of shakespearean acting. It really shows.

      --
      Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
  37. Peter Jackson = George Lucas ? by Mighty+LoPan · · Score: 1

    Double-dipped video releases & now a return to theatres? This is turning into a George Lucas-style merchandising campaign.

  38. Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would make George Lucas proud.

  39. WE HATE THE MPAA by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are ruining our right to privacy and have bought off corrupt politicians and death to all the capitalist dogs who.. Oh quick, another special edition release of LOTR! WHERES MAH CHECKBOOK.

    Who buys a movie they've seen anyways, that's something I've never understood.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:WE HATE THE MPAA by waspleg · · Score: 1

      you know i was giong to post a wtf are you thinking it's teh MPAA post but after doing 20 minutes of research I can't find new line cinema being affiliated with them in any way other than getting their films rated and getting threatend for using "goldmember" in austin powers outside the wishes of 2 james bond copyright holdrse on the mpaa.. maybe i'm wrong but i dont' think they're a part of the group..

    2. Re:WE HATE THE MPAA by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Who buys a movie they've seen anyways, that's something I've never understood

      Cinephiles, duh.

      But who the hell buys a movie they've never seen? You rent movies you haven't seen, you buy the ones you know you want to see over and over again.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:WE HATE THE MPAA by MarkLR · · Score: 1

      New Line Cinema is owned by AOL Time Warner.

  40. Re:1st post by blitzoid · · Score: 1

    Revenge of Sauron was a real dropoff in the quality of Tolkien's work. But he picked up again for awhile with the LotR/Narnia crossover.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
  41. Re:1st post by grub · · Score: 1


    "Peter Jackson clearly stated only the first three books would be part of his movie trilogy."

    Unfortunately George Lucas will take it upon himself to do it. Phear.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  42. And in related news.... by Sean80 · · Score: 1

    Reuters 7:40pm: A number of individuals have filed suit against New Line cinemas after their bladders exploded due to a marathon session of watching all 3 LOTR movies, a particular predilection for Coke and salt-topped foods, and a distaste for hanging their weenie out in cinema urinals which were cleaned sometime last decade.

    1. Re:And in related news.... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Most overheard comment at marathon showing:
      "Someone walked in, and I couldn't go."

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  43. Comprehension, was Re:Math by bourne · · Score: 1

    So where's the third DVD movie in a two movie DVD release? D'OH! Oh wait, it hasn't come out yet...

    *hem, hem*

    The article is, in fact, referring to "theatrical release." The idea is that, in the same month, the extended versions of the first two movies will be available in limited theaters, so that one might properly prep for the release of the third movie (also in theaters).

    1. Re:Comprehension, was Re:Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *hem, hem*


      Auugh, who let Dolores Umbridge on slashdot!

  44. Here's a summary of TTT for those who missed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Lord of the Rings by Jack "Rockin'-Robin" Tolkein

    Part II

    At that very moment, some wood elves were making an important discovery. Gollum had vanished!

    Could it be that he found the ring from Isildur who fell into a swamp and floated down the stream? Gandalf frowned.

    "Uruk-hai!" shouted Aragorn. "Gazundheit" said Gimli. "Orcs!" shouted Aragorn, and four hundred and twenty thousand orcs thundered down on the tiny camp. The Man Who Would Be King rolled on the ground, grappling with the murderous beasts. A left and a right. A left. Another left and a right. An uppercut to the jaw. The fight was over. And so the little Hobbits were saved.

    Frodo sat by himself looking over the wastes of Mordor. He had learned a little about volcanic rock formation, but more importantly, he had learned something about life.

  45. Give the extended version a try. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parts that you felt were missing were the parts that they restored for the extended cut. It's a much fuller, richer movie with more fleshed out characters and deeper relationships. The extra footage isn't more of the mindless battle scenes you have in mind.

    1. Re:Give the extended version a try. by babbage · · Score: 1

      Right -- fix a long, tedious movie by doing what? Watching the even longer, even more tedious version. SOUNDS FUN! :-)

    2. Re:Give the extended version a try. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you say in your other post, to each their own.

      I was responding to someone who thought the theatrical version was not long and tedious, per se, but short on character.

    3. Re:Give the extended version a try. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take that back. he did use the word tedium. oh well. I've given up debating matters of taste.

  46. Friday = MPAA is not evil ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    New Line Cinema, being a subsidiary of Time-Warner, falls under the MPAA umbrella. Now, since we all hate the business practices of the MPAA, we are obviously NOT going to be seeing these movies, right?

    That's what I thought. Either put up or shut up.

    1. Re:Friday = MPAA is not evil ??? by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      All those folks who think MPAA == evil will probably have downloaded the movie from their favorite source :)

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    2. Re:Friday = MPAA is not evil ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Probably. I think that piracy speaks just as loud as ticket sales, though. It just proves that despite everything that's going on, there is still a big enough demand for your movies that people are willing to pirate them. Any publicity is good publicity, as they say. If people suddenly stopped pirating movies, THAT would be the time for the MPAA to start worrying.

    3. Re:Friday = MPAA is not evil ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell modded parent "funny"? He's making a POINT.

  47. evil schemes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like i know exactly when to have my next virus drop its payload...

  48. Yummy by Bridog · · Score: 1

    This is getting closer to my type of movie marathon, though I must agree that theatres should be reminded of that `intermission' word. There are only two things that worry me:
    1) Will my connections be able to get me into the marathon the day before it starts when they are testing the setup?
    2) Who's going to join me when some theatre gets enough guts to run the weekend James Bond movie marathon?

    --
    Most likely the #1 Unfunny Meta/Moderator on /.!
  49. One thing that confuses me. by eclectric · · Score: 1

    So, will we get to see the extended edition of RotK?

    What I really want is all three extended editions on IMAX. Each section would be about 1.75 hours long, with a 15 minute break between each, and in six sections. Maybe even a lunch in the middle.

    I don't think I'd want to watch the movies all in one day, but I like the idea of seeing the extended editions in theatres.

    My quess is that PJ is doing this because there are some things in FotR (and possibly TT) which are only mentioned in the Extended edition and are necessary to know for RotK. He mentions it in the commentary to FotR.

    Of course, anyone nerding out like this has already read the book.... ;)

    1. Re:One thing that confuses me. by shaldannon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be excited about seeing them on IMAX too if I hadn't been disappointed with the IMAX Star Wars Episode II release. It looked fuzzy, the way something does if you blow it up 2x. Unless PJ shot with IMAX film, I think we'd get the same result :(

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    2. Re:One thing that confuses me. by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1

      Did you see the Matrix Reloaded on IMAX?

      I've seen several films on IMAX, now...Lodder Fodder and Spiderman among them (largely because of their amazing sound systems). The Matrix Reloaded, with it's "digitally enhanced IMAX Experience" was far and away the best looking of the films I've seen on IMAX. The quality was very nearly as good as a proper IMAX film.

      If Lodder Rotkah will be similarly enhanced, it might be worth your dollars...

      --
      The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
    3. Re:One thing that confuses me. by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      I didn't...I don't go see R rated movies. I guess if any (or all) of the LOTR movies came out for IMAX, I'd probably go see them just because. I just would have expected that with all of George Lucas' addiction to digital movies he would have filmed Ep II in such a way that it wouldn't look so bad when blown up...and based on that I'm a tad leery of anything not designed for the IMAX experience from the beginning...ho hum :)

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    4. Re:One thing that confuses me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Digital is only 1920x1080@24p while 35mm can approach 4x that resolution if shot the right way with the right equipment and the proper grade of film stock.

      Ironically, most IMAX transfers to DVD look like crap (I own 30 or so because I just keep hoping) when compared to modern high-quality transfers from 35mm.

    5. Re:One thing that confuses me. by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      Now that's informative. Somebody should mod you up.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    6. Re:One thing that confuses me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounsd good, but maybe I just made it up. Wouldn't be the first time. Any mod worth their mod points should at least do a little fact checking on both digital and 35mm resolutions (really resolving power) before modding me up. Or not, since I posted AC I don't care either way.

  50. In other news... by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 3, Funny

    catheter sales expected to rise 1200% for the month of December.

    --

    ---

    WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

  51. Will you help me pass out flyers for my.. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    ... LOTR Party?

    *snicker*

    Dude, forget the hobbits and the pizza and I'll come.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  52. It's an outrage! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 4, Funny

    How DARE you express such an opinion! I flame thee, sir! Feel my flame! I liked the movies and will not tolerate your going on a PUBLIC forum and having the UNMITIGATED GALL to state a difference in taste! Flame! Take that! And that!

    FLAME FLAME FLAME

    - Just wanted to make your prophecy come true...

  53. how to avoid the bathroom while watching the movie by frankmu · · Score: 4, Funny

    teach your self how to self catheterize your self during the movie

    http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/ 00 3972.htm

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  54. Yes, oh, yes by mckwant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Complete concurrance. I can't make it through the books. I've tried three times, and I always get bored/apathetic/annoyed after they leave the mushroom farmer guy for another 100 pages of trail walking.

    The first movie felt very true to the books. Long, dull, lots of walking and hiding. To paraphrase John Goodman in Barton Fink, my butt was sore after the first 45 minutes.

    The second movie (to which I was drug by my wife) was actually quite good, IMHO. I'd highly recommend it to anyone. The Gollum/Smegiel (sp?) sequences have to be seen to be believed.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
    1. Re:Yes, oh, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Gollum sequences were the only thing good about it, the rest was even more boring than the first movie.

      10 hours of this stuff??? Jeez, what are they trying to do, create an army of Zombies?

  55. Opera has been doing this for years by sammyo · · Score: 1

    Extended performances are not infrequent in the world of opera, Gotterdammerung the Wagener Ring Cycle runs about 18 hours total, this is usually over four days, but one of the operas runs six hours. There is a Phillip Glass opera (Einstein?) that usually ran over 3-4 days that had a marathon full day run. Some of the naysayers should consider LoTR as a slightly different kind of art form.

    1. Re:Opera has been doing this for years by kallisti · · Score: 1
      Extended performances are not infrequent in the world of opera, Gotterdammerung the Wagener Ring Cycle runs about 18 hours total, this is usually over four days, but one of the operas runs six hours. There is a Phillip Glass opera (Einstein?) that usually ran over 3-4 days that had a marathon full day run. Some of the naysayers should consider LoTR as a slightly different kind of art form.


      Oh, yeah, well there's a piece by John Cage called As Slow As Possible which will take 649 years to complete. An organ in Germany has started already, don't miss out!

  56. TTT was a disappointment.... by smd4985 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I totally agree - The Two Towers was an absolute disappointment. If I ever make tons of cash, I'll 1) help as many underprivileged as I can and 2) make a manly LOTR movie trilogy that is TOTALLY faithful to books (sans the tunes, maybe ;) ).

    --
    smd4985
    1. Re:TTT was a disappointment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey the Fellowship movie was good...it WAS pretty faithful to the books, changing only what needed to be changed to make paper into picture.

      TTT on the other hand...did Peter Jackson wake up one morning thinking he could out-write Tolkien? Why the extensive and horrible re-writing of the plot? He massacred Faramir, turned Theoden into a morose child killer (marching the whole town into Helm's Deep?), and introduced all kinds of pointless crap, like the abduction of the hobbits to Osgiliath, and the "death" of Aragorn. It was pretty damn obvious that Liv Tyler was on the screen only because she was Liv Tyler...she served no plot purpose at all.

      And nevermind the most important thing of all--where the hell is Anduril? It was pretty damn clear in the book that Anduril was -the- token of Aragorn's kinghood. He made no secret of that, and the sight of Anduril was enough to inspire the troops in the darkest battles.

      And yet--in the movie we have this dirty, shadowy ranger hanging out WITH THE KING HIMSELF, and then commanding his armies at Helm's Deep. Yeah, that'll happen. I'm sure Prince Charles will let me command the Royal Guard too, since hey, I'm the king baby. I've got nothing to prove it, but come on...look at how brave I look!

      I'm already dreading Anduril's appearance in RotK. I'm sure it'll be glowing like a lightsabre and have all kinds of silly magic powers to go with it. Use the force, Aragorn!

      I won't even dignify the atrocity of the "renewal" of the Last Alliance at Helm's Deep in the movie with a critique.

  57. The cow goes MOOO! by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    milk milk milk

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:The cow goes MOOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moo-moo, moo?

      Another fellow D2LOD player.

  58. It's the format by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They never should have made the movies. If they wanted to bring it to the screen, they should have done it in a series format. 1hr * 52wks * 3yrs would have given plenty of time to do the books justice...

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:It's the format by babbage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Three years? Surely you're joking. The plot arc of both "LOTR" and "The Hobbit" is one calendar year: "The Hobbit" begins one spring & finishes the following spring, while LOTR begins & ends in the fall. By stretching it out over 3 years, you're effectively making it three times slower than molasses. Sounds like a blast... :-)

    2. Re:It's the format by Arandir · · Score: 4, Funny

      August 22nd, 8:00pm PST: "The Fellowship of the Ring"

      In tonight's episode, Aragorn relates the tale of Tinuviel to Frodo, as the other hobbits sleep. Insider scoop: according to New Line Television, the actual Tinuviel backstory was filmed, but due to protests by geeks it was dropped in favor of a true-to-book one hour narration by Viggo Mortensen.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:It's the format by J_DarkElf · · Score: 1

      You seem to forget about the EXTREME contraction of the time lapse between Bilbo's farewell party, and the first appearance of the Nazgul.

      In the movie, it almost seems to be the next day -- in the book, years pass. This same contraction occurs from the Shire to Bree, or indeed every single step of their journey. With the speed Jackson is going, he'll have to make up even more Warrior Princess Xen^H^H^H Arwen scenes, or they'll bring down Barad'Dur in the first five seconds of ROTK.

      But you are right in that the main action occurs in one year, namely 3018TA. (The Hobbit takes place in 2941TA. Of course both The Hobbit and LOTR actually end much later, but let's keep our attention on the main action only.)

    4. Re:It's the format by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Informative

      LOTR begins when Frodo is 33 and Bilbo is 111. The first chapter concerns with their joint birthday party and Bilbo's departure from the Shire.

      Fast-forward 17 years, to when Frodo is 50 and Bilbo is 128. Gandalf shows up in the *spring*, tells Frodo all about the One Ring, and then says, I'll be back by fall (of 3018).

      The hobbits have their adventures and return to the Shire around November 1st of the *following* year (3019). Then there's a handful more pages, and in 3021, Frodo, Bilbo, and the Three Keepers (Gandalf, Elrond, Galadriel) leave Middle-Earth. Sam returns home shortly thereafter, and *that's* when LOTR ends. Technically, the book encompasses a bit over 20 years, although the bulk of the action occurs within a span of about a year and a half.

      <pedantic mode=off>

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    5. Re:It's the format by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      a true-to-book one hour narration by Viggo Mortensen.

      You know, I would totally watch that.

    6. Re:It's the format by babbage · · Score: 1
      You seem to forget about the EXTREME contraction of the time lapse between Bilbo's farewell party, and the first appearance of the Nazgul.

      Like the Phish & Grateful Dead concerts I went to because everyone swore up & down how wonderful they are -- they are not wonderful, and those friends were damned dirty liars -- I find that the more I can forget about Tolkein's books, the happier I am :-)

      Nonetheless...

      In the movie, it almost seems to be the next day -- in the book, years pass [....] But you are right in that the main action occurs in one year [....]

      I appear to have caught you in a contradiction here, but then...

      [....], namely 3018TA. (The Hobbit takes place in 2941TA. Of course both The Hobbit and LOTR actually end much later, but let's keep our attention on the main action only.)

      ...after this you went off the deep end completely, and I'm not going to follow you down to those depths. Sorry :-)

      Please note that I try to be charitible, but long & boring just isn't my thing. I absolutely hated "The Godfather" trilogy, in spite of how wonderful everyone says they are, but then I really like "Lawrence of Arabia" and "Seven Samurai". I would have liked "Heat" more if Michael Mann had been brave enough to admit that the movie would have been much tighter if he cut out at least 1/3 of it. The strength of "Heat" was that it was a very well done action movie (an oxymoron, in most cases) wrapped up in a long, boring soap opera.

      The strength of "Lawrence" and "Samurai" is there is no melodramatics bogging down the story. The flaw in heat is that the story is drowned in a tub of soap opera. The fatal flaw of "Godfather" and "LOTR" is that the melodramatics is the story.

      Some people love that. I'm not one of them. To each their own...

    7. Re:It's the format by babbage · · Score: 1
      a true-to-book one hour narration by Viggo Mortensen.
      You know, I would totally watch that.
      That's why you're accepted here at Slashdot. :-)
    8. Re:It's the format by DrewCapu · · Score: 1
      Three years? Surely you're joking. The plot arc of both "LOTR" and "The Hobbit" is one calendar year: "The Hobbit" begins one spring & finishes the following spring, while LOTR begins & ends in the fall. By stretching it out over 3 years, you're effectively making it three times slower than molasses. Sounds like a blast... :-)
      This is basically what I say to everyone who watches "24" :)
    9. Re:It's the format by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Yes, you and the other three of us.

      Hence, no series.

    10. Re:It's the format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's simply no way the Tale of Tinuviel could be told in one hour.

    11. Re:It's the format by Nept · · Score: 1

      aragorn told it in what, 20 minutes?

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    12. Re:It's the format by nametaken · · Score: 1

      From the point of view of someone who has never read any of the books, I'm surprised to hear this. It did, most certainly, seem to be only a few days between the birthday/departure, and when Gandalf shows up to tell Frodo about the ring.

    13. Re:It's the format by sholden · · Score: 1

      They reduced the time span for the movie. After all the exciting rush to leave the shire just isn't as exciting when it takles place over two decades.

      Turning LoTR into as movie without making such major changes would result in the most mind numbingly boring film ever made.

  59. What a way to make $$$$ by precogpunk · · Score: 0

    If only record companies new how to run their business like this and get fans (suckers?) to buy the same (but slightly different version) of something over and over again. I know that was the thought with singles and remixes but maybe they should use what ended up on the editing room floor instead and have the artist talk 2 hours about how much meaning is in their songs. Thank god I have netflix!

  60. I won't even see the original release in theatres. by evilviper · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sorry guys, I'm not falling for it.

    Like most everyone, I liked the LOTR a great deal (borrowed it from a friend that rented it), but that doesn't mean I am going to pay out the nose to see it 5 times each time they release one of the 100 different versions.

    Frankly, I don't give a damn about the extended version, deleted scenes, commentary where they sit around talking about nothing for hours, trailers, etc. I go, I rent the movie, and if I like it, I buy a DVD when it's finally down to $10, and then I'm done. I don't care if they re-release it, or play it in slow-mo, or anything else like that.

    Frankly, by going to all the re-releases, and buying the DVDs 2 or 3 times to get extra footage, all you are doing is to encourage them to cut lots of content out of the original movie, and add it later to rake you over the coals. Forget it. I buy the movie, I watch it, and I keep it. They can release it from different angles, and with all the extra footage they want, but don't expect me to spend an extra cent on it.

    In fact, I've stopped going to theatres because 9 times out of 10, the new movies are crap, and $100 to see one good 90minute movie is absolutely ridiculous, especially when you have people talking, babies crying, cell-phones ringing, overpriced snacks, etc. The more money they try to seperate me from, the tighter I hold on to it, and the less fun the movies are.

    Right now, I'm looking into spending $1,000 for a wide-screen HDTV projector that I can hook-up to my computer, then invite friends over every couple of weeks to watch a new movie on DVD. Who gives a damn if you have to wait a few months? Not like seeing it that much earlier is going to make your life better for those few months.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  61. The general problem with books and movies is... by raehl · · Score: 1

    One book -> Three movies.

    If you've ever seen a book adaptation of a movie, you'll note that they tend to be terribly short. It would take three movies to get one good-sized book.

    Then you turn three books into three movies, even three really long movies, you lose a lot of stuff.

    Or, done in the reverese, if Star Wars were originally done as a book/trilogy, Ep. 1-3 would have been Volume I and Ep. 4-6 would have been Volume II. Each of the two movie "trilogies" has the plot flow of ONE novel, not three separate novels.

    I'm not quite sure why movie studios don't do the one to three adaptation, as it gives you 8 guaranteed profitable sequels instead of 2.

    1. Re:The general problem with books and movies is... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Mostly because if the first bombs, then they know the last two will also likely bomb, but if they don't make the second and third, then they will have run into a public relations nightmare.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  62. Re:Intermissions by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back when there were intermissions my grandfather would leave my grandmother alone halfway through Charlton Heston movies to go fishing.

    I'm sure theaters wouldn't mind an opportunity to sell more snacks. Then again, there are so many jackasses now that most people would stampede in and out, everyone would lose their good seats, and people might get PO'd or hurt in the hubub.

  63. R Rating? by detritus. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember there was talk about how they initially left out some scenes in the FOTR theatrical release because it would have given them an "R" rating. One has to wonder if the extended-edition DVD release of the FOTR (which still had a PG-13 rating) still cut out the violent scenes from all releases, or if the MPAA changed their mind, or if they will include the violent scenes in the re-release and give it an "R" rating?

    1. Re:R Rating? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      As I recall, most of the stuff that got cut was in the end battle scene... notably Aragorn butchering Uruk Hai as he ran down to Boromir. Also, an Uruk Hai pulling a knife out of his leg and licking the blood...

      Ratings are weird. Sometimes cutting a couple of seconds will drop it from R to PG-13.

      Sometimes resubmitting the exact same film will do that, too...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  64. So, so, scwheet... by Stephonovich · · Score: 1
    Hey, yell and complain all you want, you know there's a certain mark of honor that comes with sitting through all three LOTR. Plus, it'll just be cool.

    My only question is, are the movies in the marathon going to be the Extended Editions, at least the first two?

    (-:Stephonovich:-)

    --
    "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
  65. I predict... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... that 9 months from December, we'll see a sharp decline in the number of babies born.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:I predict... by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 0

      ... that 9 months from December, we'll see a sharp decline in the number of babies born.

      Bad Assumption: Those watching ever figured otu how to reproduce.

      Either way, Darwinism at work. :)

      -B

    2. Re:I predict... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the movie goers wouldn't be producing babies

    3. Re:I predict... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      this assumes that the people who are going to go see these would have gotten some had they stayed at home *rimshot*

      nobody ever got fired for making jokes about slashdot's readers' lack of female companions (including me!)

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    4. Re:I predict... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Wrong. That would mean that geeks would have bred those days.
      Geeks don't breed.

    5. Re:I predict... by dupper · · Score: 1
      Why? It's not like the movies' intended audience is viable breeding stock, anyways.

      (-1, Obvious)

    6. Re:I predict... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      Then how come we're not dying out? We're not are we?

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    7. Re:I predict... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Well, we're not having sex either... I reckon we're one of them mysteries of nature...

    8. Re:I predict... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Mules don't breed. They don't seem to be dying out.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  66. Maybe a Rant, but... by greymond · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm so glad I didn't buy any of the DVD's for the LOTR trilogy, just because I feel really bad for all the fans who have a "sucky" version or have spent tons of cash on all the different versions of the dvd's. Because of this i'm just gonna wait till the summer after ROTK to buy whatever becomes the "almost-most-fulfilling-3-dvd-set-of-themoment" then at least i'll have all 3 and of only paid one price instead of owning 6 versions of each of the first movies AND the trilogy as a set.

    1. Re:Maybe a Rant, but... by slipstick · · Score: 1

      Ah your loss than.

      If I tried to remember how many copies of LOTR I've purcashed I'd probably puke. I've given them all away gladly, knowing I'd buy another copy. This is the one item in all my life that I would continue to pay even devils like the MPAA to experience. When I lose the wonder of experiencing this piece of art(book,film, whatever) I guess it will be time to leave this rock.

      --
      Sure information wants to be free, but how much are you willing to pay for the packaging?
    2. Re:Maybe a Rant, but... by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's a similar problem with music CDs. You buy the American release, then you find out the Japanese release has a couple extra songs or a few years later there's the "remastered edition for idiots" or something, so you buy that. Now you're fucked, right?

      No, the trick is to give away your old versions. That's all you have to do. You're out the money, but it's only money. The part that really hurts is having more than one copy in your possession. It feels inefficient (which is the worst thing possible), and you have a constant reminder that you got ripped off. Just give the old one away, and you're all set.

      Not to mention to score points with whoever you give it to.

      I'm about to visit some friends in about a week. They should know by now that they're going to recieve what has come to be known as "used discards" -- CDs that I liked so much that I bought 'em twice. :-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Maybe a Rant, but... by Mathness · · Score: 1



      ha ha ha

      The joke is on you, 6 months later, when the "almost-most-fulfilling-3-dvd-set-of-themoment" is replaced by the "a bit more complete 3 LOTR movie DVD set with commentary by Tolkien himself (via a medium)".

      But wait, there is more, wait 3 years more, and get the "nearly complete 3 LOTR movie DVD set with The Hobbit".

      </evil corporate robot>

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    4. Re:Maybe a Rant, but... by greymond · · Score: 1

      ou left out the 10 yr anniversary edition digitally remastered in THX :)

    5. Re:Maybe a Rant, but... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Because of this i'm just gonna wait till the summer after ROTK to buy whatever becomes the "almost-most-fulfilling-3-dvd-set-of-themoment" then at least i'll have all 3 ...which will be followed by the "soon-but-not-so-soon-you'd-want-to-wait" release of the movies in HD DVDs, first individually, then as a collectors set, then as an extended version set and whatnot. No, you can't win.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  67. I'm Waiting. by Sir+Rhosys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please call me when they have released the "Truly Final Director's Cut of the Entire Trilogy with No More Special Editions in the Pipeline to Bleed You Dry With, We Promise - Special Edition - Widescreen" DVDs.

    Once they do, I will wait 9 months and THEN buy it.

    Of course, I am just bitter because I bought a lousy Fullscreen edition of Fellowship by accident. Lousy, no good, pan-and-scan.

    --

    Use Python

    1. Re:I'm Waiting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't wait too long though...Peter Jackson MIGHT just get the urge to release an ULTRA directors cut, where all the swords are replaced by walkie-talkies, and the word 'orc' is replaced with 'hippie'.

      Oh, and the Prancing Pony will now feature an CGI cabaret show.

  68. Marathon! by CodeWheeney · · Score: 1

    Give me an inflatable donut seat and a catheter baby, I'm there!

    --
    C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
  69. physicists do the work of god and... by ph43thon · · Score: 1

    God does the work of mathematicians.

  70. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, $1000 HDTV / $10 avg movie cost. If you only go to see the ones that look interesting, that's a few years worth of movie going, probably longer than the projector (crappy @ only $1K) will last.

  71. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by TheVampire · · Score: 1

    "Right now, I'm looking into spending $1,000 for a wide-screen HDTV projector that I can hook-up to my computer, then invite friends over every couple of weeks to watch a new movie on DVD. Who gives a damn if you have to wait a few months? Not like seeing it that much earlier is going to make your life better for those few months."

    The way things are going, the MPAA will soon have it made illegal to show the movie to anyone not in the household that bought it!

  72. The One Movie to Rule Them All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can see them all.

    WhatMeWorry!

  73. How to make a little money by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

    First movie out:
    Release DVD
    Release DVD directors cut with extra stuff

    Second movie out:
    Relase DVD
    Release DVD directors cut with extra stuff
    Release box set with both movies.
    Release box set with both movies directors cut and extra stuff

    Third Movie Out:
    Relase DVD
    Release DVD directors cut with extra stuff
    Release box set with all movies.
    Release box set with all movies directors cut and extra stuff


    Then of course you could insert "release pan and scan version of the movie" and "release pan and scan version of directors cut with extra stuff" in all of the about to double the releases. And then of course there will be the cartoon series for the weekend mornings, and different cd versions of soundtracks from all the movies.

    AND then there is mercendising, mercendising....where the real money from the movie is made...
    (I am currently waiting for the flamethrower myself)

  74. That's unfortunate by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    I very much enjoyed the movie adaptions. I went into them with serious reservations in mind, based on every other experience I've had with book-turned-movie, and was impressed with their effort.

    It's difficult to compare what's on the screen to the canvas of the mind; a fertile imagination brings the story to life, and makes an adaption that's uniquely yours. I read those book multiple times as a young man, often going back to read them again while contemplating a portion I didn't understand. I can still recall some passages word-for-word... such is the power of these works in a young mind with a vivid imagination.

    Every adaption somebody else makes, and filters through their own mind, is going to come up short in yours, if only from unmet expectations about how it SHOULD be.

    I'd say give it another chance, particularly if you loved the books... appreciate the differences between someone else's rendition of that world, and your own. You'll always have your own rich, individual version; experiencing someone else's might enrich it further...

    Just a thought.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  75. The Trilogy Compressed by danila · · Score: 1

    Watching LOTR for 11 hours straight is cool, but you can't have that much fun every day (unless you have a bad case of anteriorgrade amnesia). When all three movies are released, I want to reedit them to fit LOTR trilogy in a more comfortable 1.5 hours. :-)

    That might be a ">funny challenge, to compress the movie 10+ times, keeping the story intact and syncing the soundtrack. :)

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  76. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    I can one-up you on that. I don't even have a DVD player. Just a 26" CRT TV with no extra sound system or speakers. Ha!

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  77. What?!?! by El · · Score: 1

    There's somebody out there who HASN'T read the books??? I figure it would take over 30 hours to tell the whole story, so you're always going to be missing something if you haven't read the books.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:What?!?! by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I have now. I saw the DVD of Fellowship (not in theaters) like Octoberish, then TTT in the theaters. I decided that I couldn't wait until this December to find out how it ends (ok, so I had a pretty good idea that (SPOILER: Gollum went down with the ring, but not much more) so decided I must read RotK. And of course you can't read the final installment with only the movies as background...

      But yeah, if someone else is reading this who hasn't read LotR, I reccommend it. It goes pretty quickly actually; it's not hard reading, so don't let the length scare you away. (I'm lazy and not a reader, so reading a 1000 pg book, even though I kinda wanted to, wasn't too appealing.)

    2. Re:What?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noooooo...not Gollum!!

  78. WHAT ABOUT BOYCOTTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the RIAA and MPAA? A short memory span, have we not? I, for, one will d'load and watch it, or not at all

    1. Re:WHAT ABOUT BOYCOTTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe most of us don't give a shit about your 'right' to petty theft.

  79. Reminds me of by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    times back in school when local bars would have "bladder bust" nights... free beer until somebody either used the bathroom, or left the bar.

    The medical students were world champions at it... no hopping around on one leg, no peeing in a cup under the table... I didn't realize until some time later that they were all wearing condom-catheters and leg bags.

    Tricksey medical ssstudentssss....

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  80. Friday = MPAA is not evil ??? by Mista+LovaLova · · Score: 1

    Can you tell me how many CD-R's im going to need, umm.. i mean are going to be in the unofficial SVCD release?? ;)

  81. Re:how to avoid the bathroom while watching the mo by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, how long have you been saving that link for an opportunity to get a +5 funny?

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  82. Re:1st post by Nept · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually ...
    Sauron Defeated (book 9 of the history of middle earth) contains drafts of JRR Tolkien's planned
    "Epilogue" to LotR. "The Peoples of Middle-earth", Vol 12 of HoMe, contains drafts of a planned sequel, "The New Shadow".
    So there actually sort of was a book 4.

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  83. Helpful hints... by donutz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm NOT gonna survive on theater popcorn, hotdogs and mega-jumbo Cokes for 11 hours. I hope they have intermissions between the films so we can hit the mall food court...

    How NOT to smuggle food into the movies...

  84. Re:If you never read LOTR go fuck yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    **Starts to fuck self**

  85. McKellen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch the cast commentary on the extended edition of Fellowship, at some point near the end of the first disc Ian McKellen starts rambling on about the relationship between Frodo and Sam. I have no idea what he was talking about but it had something to do with him being homosexual and trying to convince Peter Jackson to do something. Maybe someone can find out what the hell he was talking about.

  86. /.'s will be broke by chmilar · · Score: 2, Funny
    Let's see: many /.'s will:
    • See each movie multiple times in theatres.
    • See the re-releases in theatres.
    • See the IMAX Ultimate LOTR Marathon theatrical release.
    • Buy each movie DVD on first issue.
    • Buy the Extended Edition DVD on first issue.
    • Buy the Extended Edition DVD collector's 3-pack (with bonus material).
    • Buy the Super Extended Edition with more bonus extras DVD 5-pack.
    • Buy the "Superbit" 3-pack (with better image quality).
    • Buy it all again on HD-DVD.
    New Line will make plenty of money!
    --
    Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
  87. LOL! by Kruid · · Score: 1

    For all the griping about the RIAA/MPAA, you people can't wait to hand them your money. Consider yourselves beaten - Point, Match!

    --
    Your mind moves quicker than a nun's first curry. - A. Rimmer
  88. The question I still want answered... by jd · · Score: 1
    In certain editions of LOTR, the ending includes the death of Aragorn, and how Aragorn first encountered the elves at The LAst Homely House. (This is where Bilbo writes his poem about the sword.)


    There's also the elven poem on the audio tapes, which fits into LOTR.


    But does this extra material appear in the movies? Extended or no?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  89. Re:I'm a Toker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will join in the merry weed.

  90. Sweet, this means.... by essiescreet · · Score: 1

    We can combine this with the monthly meeting of the I'll-never-get-laid club, and free up the laser tag warehouse...

  91. Re:Ahh, yes, there it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cripes, I wish I had my "longsword +2, +4 vs. trollkin". Anyways...

    BSODs are the result of a poorly written (file-)tree getting too out-of-balance to recover. Not much you can do about it, except avoid the circumstances that cause it-- which is NOT the way you should have to handle problems. They should have written it right in the first place.

  92. ROTK Extended Edition in theaters? by r5t8i6y3 · · Score: 1

    but will we ever be able to see the ROTK Extended Edition in theaters?

  93. Have we forgotten? by dswensen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has the Slashdot hive mind forgotten?

    Jack Valenti blah blah MPAA blah blah evil blah blah DRM blah blah Orwellian world of terror blah blah...

    OK, that's out of the way, you can go about your business.

    1. Re:Have we forgotten? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can always download the DVD rips.

  94. Re:how to avoid the bathroom while watching the mo by Sovern · · Score: 1

    1. Wear a kilt.

    2. Buy three drinks.

    3. Refill them yourself .

    4. Remember to remove the straw.

    5. Did you remember the straw?

    Or Wear a diaper

    And lightwave renders on and on and on.....

    --
    And it rendered on, until the end of its days.
  95. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by Atlantix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do understand and share your feelings about 90 minute films being a waste and deleted scenes/extras on most DVDs not being worth it. I definitely feel cheated when I walk out of a short and overhyped movie, especially when I can tell it's that short because the director couldn't find any more material that qualified as "good".

    With that said, there is a HUGE difference with the LOTR DVDs. You're starting with a 3 hour movie in which Peter Jackson made cuts he DIDN'T want to make. Then, they didn't just provide the unfinished deleted scenes on a menu on a separate disc, they integrated those scenes back into the original film along with newly recorded soundtrack material. And they did it so well that the Fellowship movie actually feels different (and more complete). The extras are also impressive in the amount of detail shown about the production process. Most extras are interviews filmed after the fact. These were an integrated part of the production which is why they are actually worth watching. I'm expecting just as polished a job for the Two Towers. If anything, the success of these movies and the DVDs should prove to other studios that we recognize and want quality.

    As for raking us over the coals, yes many DVD re-releases do just that (how many versions of T2 exist now?). However, New Line has been very upfront about their plans for the LOTR DVDs. They announced early on that there would be two releases for each movie: one with the theatrical release and minimal extras, and one with an extended version of the film and many different extras. That last part is important. Having bought both Fellowship DVDs I can honestly say in the many hours of extras there is almost no overlap (less than 15 minutes at a guess) between the extras on the two releases. New Line and Peter Jackson have also announced (before either release of Fellowship) that there would be NO super-mega-deluxe editions of the movies. Once all the movies are out, they'll certainly package them together but they'll package them as they are.

    Various conspiracy theorists won't believe such announcements, and given the history of the movie industry, I can understand why. But I do believe Peter Jackson if for no other reason than they put so MUCH into the extras that I have no idea what they could be saving.

    --Atlantix

  96. easier than Titanic! by peter303 · · Score: 1

    At least there isnt all that water sloshing around reminding you of your bladder!

    1. Re:easier than Titanic! by hamster+foo · · Score: 1

      The difference being, I actually WANTED to leave Titanic. =P

      --
      - b
  97. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by evilviper · · Score: 1
    If you only go to see the ones that look interesting, that's a few years worth of movie going

    Indeed, it's a about the price of one person going to see 100 movies.

    It's also the price of 50 gallons of gasoline, but so what? Getting a projector, I have MUCH MUCH more than I could get by going to see 100 movies. First of all, no matter how much I would want to, I can't go spend $10 and see any movie I want in a theatre, unless it's one of the 10 or so that is currently in theatres. It's also a much better experience, as I mentioned, and the price is really nominal if shared between just a few people.

    probably longer than the projector (crappy @ only $1K) will last.

    3 year warranty. I would watch FAR more than 100 movies on it in 3 years, and probably have multiple people watching them as well, and watching movies I can't see in theatres, further increasing the value of a projector.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  98. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    In fact, I've stopped going to theatres because 9 times out of 10, the new movies are crap, and $100 to see one good 90minute movie is absolutely ridiculous, especially when you have people talking, babies crying, cell-phones ringing, overpriced snacks, etc. The more money they try to seperate me from, the tighter I hold on to it, and the less fun the movies are.

    I think somebody needs a hug.

  99. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by evilviper · · Score: 1
    The way things are going, the MPAA will soon have it made illegal to show the movie to anyone not in the household that bought it!

    It's a borderline issue at best. Frankly, I don't care much about the legality of it, since it's not really possible for them to do anything about it...

    That's why private P2P networks are getting popular. No matter the legality of the actions, it's impossible for the MPAA to prove what is going on (without getting one of the trusted members to be a snitch).
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  100. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by phidipides · · Score: 1

    >Frankly, by going to all the re-releases, and
    >buying the DVDs 2 or 3 times to get extra footage,
    >all you are doing is to encourage them to cut lots
    >of content out of the original movie, and add it
    >later to rake you over the coals.

    Quick disclaimer is that while I work for a movie studio, I'm not in movie production. However, in dealing with the DVD marketing guys I can tell you that for successful movies, there does not seem to be a push to come out with lots of different editions. In the case of the Lord of the Rings movies, Peter Jackson wanted to make a four hour movie but knew mass audiences wouldn't sit through it, so he created a single, extended edition for himself and for the fans. Unless there is a _huge_ push from the fans, there aren't going to be any more editions from the filmmakers (yes, marketing will probably create a three-set, but no new movie footage, just new packaging). And I can practically guarantee you that Peter Jackson isn't sitting on cut film, waiting for the "super duper edition".

    Just as an example, the upcoming Terminator 3 DVD is meant to be _the_ definitive edition. If fans want a three-set there might be something added later on, but the studio isn't holding anything back, and there definitely isn't cut film being held aside specifically for another edition. While pitching the new DVD to distributors it was made abundantly clear that this is going to be _the_ Terminator 3 DVD, and only if fans want it, and if a deal between Universal and Warner can be worked out, would there be any further work on a three-set.

    Summary: if fans demand more, there will be more, but filmmakers don't sit on content solely to make money on DVDs. The movie in the theatre is the best movie that directors can make for a mass audience.

  101. The only real hope for the remaining two films.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..is the extended edition.

    IMO, The Fellowship was right on the mark. When I saw the normal version, I thought it was extremely well done. True, Jackson meddled with many things, but quite frankly - a film's audience isn't going to want to see some crochety old lawn gnome (*coughBombadilcough*) appear for one scene and then never be heard about save for one line by Gandalf at the end of the trilogy.

    The extended edition, of course, added so much more. It's how The Fellowship should've been filmed in the first place - and damn the length!

    I had high hopes for The Two Towers. Until I saw Aragorn fall off a cliff, Legolas shieldboarding down stairs, heard Gimli's incessant short jokes that got tiring after the first one.. I think, however, the worst part was the total assassination of Faramir's character by Jackson.

    (HINT: For those of you who haven't read the books, Faramir != Boromir. K THX BYEBYE.)

    I can only hope that the extended edition brings the entire Osgiliath scene to better light. As it stands now, the scene actually seems juxtaposed - dialogue simply does not match up correctly. I'm hoping this is indeed a case of, "Wull, we had to make cuts.. And.."

    If so, they could've chosen a better place to make cuts - like Legolas' ninja antics, or Liv Tyler's (I will not call that character Arwen) constant whining.

  102. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I wasn't going for elitism. Just pointing out how the MPAA is successfully raping the public through crap like this, time and time again.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  103. But it is my cup of tea by Clomer · · Score: 1

    I agree that the theatrical version was a bit lacking. Many things were missing, others were just glossed over (Lorien comes to mind). I would even go so far as to say that yes, it was boring. I, for one, will never watch the original theatrical version of Fellowship ever again.

    The extended edition, OTOH, has pretty much everthing the original release was missing. The story is much more fleshed out and real, instead of just glossed over. The characters have more depth. It's amazing what a few extra seconds here and there did for it. (in many cases that's all it amounted to)

    My mom, (not a fantasy fan by any stretch of the imagination) fell asleep while watching FotR in the theater. She didn't like it. But when I got the extended edition and saw how much better it was, I convinced her to give it a try. She agrees with me that the extended edition is a far better movie, and she actually enjoyed it!

    So John, do yourself a favor and give the extended edition a try. If you still don't like it, then that's your perogative, but at least you gave it a shot.

    --
    Intelligent responses welcome, flames will be met with marshmallows.
  104. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by evilviper · · Score: 1
    I think somebody needs a hug.

    No, I've just stopped going to the theatres... Problem solved.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  105. Of course... by Schnapple · · Score: 1
    ... the Return of the King movie won't be the extended edition. It'll still be hella long, but it won't be like you're seeing all three extended editions back to back.

    Unless of course there's not going to be an Extended ROTK, in which case disregard my previous paragraph.

    But then again there's got to be an EE ROTK, since there's got to be those 2 DVD's come December 2004. Man, that's going to be like over four hours of movie.

  106. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    without getting one of the trusted members to be a snitch

    I don't think that is hard at all to do because nothing has to be done in person. Try infiltrating a militant idealogical group. That would be hard.

    robi

  107. I thought we were against the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that we were against the MPAA because of how they treat their customers?

  108. We want more! by Tuor · · Score: 1
    I her humbly beg Peter Jackson to divide the rest of the series into TWO more movies. There simply isn't enough!

    I'll buy tickets for both part 1 and part 2 of the Return of the King in advance! Please. PLEASE!

    I would hate for RotK to feel rushed. Well, at least make it so long we need an intermission in it. Say a five hour movie?

    --
    I love my computer -- You make me feel alright (Bad Religion)
  109. great idea by Lhet · · Score: 1

    That way, you can wear your costume for the duration of all 3 movies without changing... Snah

  110. Invest in two companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Line, of course, and Kimberly Clark (manufacturer of Depends undergarments)

  111. Return of the King of the Hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too am excited with Fox releasing the return of the King of the Hill.

    Hank, Dale, Bobby; all legends in the annals of great storytelling. The part where Boomhauer runs over the hobbits in his classic Camaro had me rolling on the floor.

  112. Don't wait by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    New Line have said they're not going to release such an edition. The extended editions are it. IMO, they're treating us well, announcing all editions in advance and making sure that the theatrical and extended edition DVD's don't overlap at all. Oh yeah, and next time, RTFB!

  113. Two Towers was amazing by fegg · · Score: 2

    Granted, the book was richer than the movie in content, but the visuals were incredible. Plus, if you get a chance to watch the World Series of Poker on ESPN, you can imagine Scotty Nguyen in the role of Gollum. Just throw the championship bracelet on the table and wait for him to screech "The Precious! MUST HAVE THE PRECIOUSSS!"

    (I know, that will be lost on most of this audience, but if you've seen it, you'll know what I mean.)

    If the Star Wars people put even one hundredth of the thought and effort into "Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones"...

    1. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Jonner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I enjoyed TTT, but not as much as FTR. It deviated from the original in more serious ways, such as assassinating the character of Faramir, having the Hobbits trick the Ents, and leaving out Gandalf's confrontation with Saruman. All of the stuff with Arwen was invented and somewhat tedious.

    2. Re:Two Towers was amazing by amorsen · · Score: 1

      The TTT also had another character fall down to his death, yet survive in the end. I wonder who it will be in RotK.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Jonner · · Score: 1

      There certainly is a character who falls to his death and it's pretty permanent.

    4. Re:Two Towers was amazing by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      i agree the movie disappointed me, Fellowship was very good. The Two Towers had some good spots, but they re-wrote far too much of it. Some of the battle scenes were good, and I enjoyed the Warg fight.

      Of course, I liked Gimli a bit in the books (along with all things dwarf related in Tolkiens works) but for the most part they made gimli out to be a pansy, which was just wrong.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    5. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Jonner · · Score: 1

      How was he a pussy? He was always shown to be a formidable warrior in the movies, just as in the original story. In particular, there was the competition between Legolas and Gimli, showing both their friendly rivalry and that they were nearly evenly matched in battle prowess. The movies do rely on Gimli for comic relief more than Tolkien did, but he isn't shown to be weak of body or character. His main disadvantage seems to be his short stature, which is quite plausible.

    6. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I liked TTT, but was a bit disappointed with some of the changes. Some of the stuff with Arwen is taken from Appendix A about the death of Aragorn, one of my favourite parts of LoTR, but it wasnt true to the story. eg Aragorn says "but never more than a memory" in the movie to argue for Arwen to stay, but in the book he means that that they will be more than a memory because the Gift of Death means that they will be together and being mortal will return to Iluvatar, which the Elves can only wait wearily for until the end of the world.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    7. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, then. I thought the whole subplot of Arwen choosing between leaving and staying was invented for the movie. I read "Return of the King" quite a while ago. Perhaps I didn't read the Appendix or just forgot it. I'm reading the book again now.

    8. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      Star Warts sucked cause Lucas didn't bring the same creative team back (i.e. the directors and scriptwriters of ESB and RotJ). The original IMHO is not near as good as the following two.

      I suspect he wanted to claim all the credit for himself and went and blew it.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    9. Re:Two Towers was amazing by kubrick · · Score: 1

      You didn't see the memo regarding the newly revised ending?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    10. Re:Two Towers was amazing by Jonner · · Score: 1

      No somone's getting memos from beyond the grave?

  114. Not 1337 Enough by MuParadigm · · Score: 1

    I don't even have a CRT TV. No TV at all. No CRT. Just the DVD player in my computer and the flat panel monitor.

    Television is just too depressing. The concept that you have to schedule a certain amount of time each week, at a specific time, to watch something generated for the purpose of catching your eyeball and exposing it to advertising is just, well, depressing.

    Besides, I think there's something about the refresh rate that dulls the brain.

    1. Re:Not 1337 Enough by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      The concept that you have to schedule a certain amount of time each week, at a specific time
      No you don't. VCRs? TiVo?
      to watch something generated for the purpose of catching your eyeball and exposing it to advertising
      Record it, and skip over the commercials. Or if you want to watch it as it's broadcast, mute the commercials. Or just ignore the commercials, like I do. :)
      Besides, I think there's something about the refresh rate that dulls the brain.
      Not that anyone's ever been able to determine. :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  115. How nice of them, to milk us for every last dollar by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    They are swell! Gotta love them!
    Now we can all own 3 copies of the
    first movie and two of the second.
    By the time the third is released,
    we will all be able to own 3, 3 and 1.
    Give them another year and it will be
    3, 3 and 3. I can have a set next to
    all my DVD players, so I never have
    to carry it around. :^)

  116. Against the MPAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that we were all against the MPAA because of their tactics?

  117. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then invite friends over every couple of weeks to watch a new movie on DVD. The way things are going, the MPAA will soon have it made illegal to show the movie to anyone not in the household that bought it!

    That already is illegal. Or, at least, prohibited in the license under which you agreed to enjoy the movie. Watch the FBI warning carefully - licensed for private home use only. Public performance is prohibited, whether or not you charge, which is what you are doing. I remember reading an article a while back about how the MPAA was going to try cracking down on movie clubs like those, in big cities, but I don't remember where it was.

  118. This might work too... by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1
    --
    My father is a blogger.
  119. Re:how to avoid the bathroom while watching the mo by madgeorge · · Score: 1

    Not as long as I've been saving this one.

  120. Off topic, because the topic is kind of boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    better topic headlines from Fark.com:

    If you run over someone to obtain a corpse for sex, you will be tried as an adult

    Man chokes on hot dog while driving, passes out, drives into house

    Man with high cholesterol celebrates 65th birthday by eating a burger in each of Kansas' 105 counties

    Performer shot in head by crossbow during act in front of 500 fans.

    Sheep escapes being prop in bible-school production; gets struck by lightning

  121. The seventh sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mix the following ingredients:

    * Extended versions of all 3 LOTR movies
    * 10 full-size bags of cheetos
    * 10 cases of coca cola
    * Home-made medeival armor
    * After-movie D&D setup in the basement

    Mixing and chanting "Ni" will summon the terrible god of geekdom to scour the world for social acceptance.

  122. Hobbits tripping with Bombadil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they would go ahead and film that scene and the burrow downs and put them in the DVD special editions.

    Just for the truly geeky among us.

    1. Re:Hobbits tripping with Bombadil by m1chael · · Score: 0

      also the months after the party in fellowship of the ring where their is lots of waiting... very suspenseful. will frodo go today? this week? this month?! who knows!

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  123. Now for a *serious* LOTR geek marathon... by BayAreaRefugee · · Score: 1

    How many out there will start at noon or 1:00 PM by watching the animated The Hobbit flick before heading to the theaters? Thinking we might want to see if we can get our folks at work let us watch it on the projection screen there for a day of "theater-quality" Tolkien back-to-back! Then instead of 11 straight hours you'd have around 13 straight hours!!

  124. Re:how to avoid the bathroom while watching the mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I like the acronym in that article -

    clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC)
  125. Are you kidding? by sailor420 · · Score: 1

    9 months from December, we'll see a sharp decline in the number of babies born.

    That won't be much of a concern. Somehow I doubt the /. crowd has much influence over the number of babies being conceived.

  126. penciled in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I know where I'll be spending over a lot of time this late-fall/early winter...

  127. Re:Not my cup of tea - I understand by mamahuhu · · Score: 1

    I know what you mean.

    When I saw the theatrical release of Fellowship I thought it was a bit flat.

    In fact I thought that the Middle Earth of Fellowship was not beautiful enough, that it was too dark and stark, certainly not green enough. I blame it on Jackson living in Wellington which is a bit like that - whereas I grew up in Christchurch and my vision of Middle Earth was based on my childhood memories of the very places they filmed the movie.The South Island was for me Middle Earth! But the movie I think lost a lot of that feeling for me.

    The extended DVD was a revelation therefore. Not only did all the characters gain depth and breadth but so did Middle Earth. I went from not feeling too special about the movie, not wanting to see it again, and being bemused by my sister's enthusiasm, to rapture at how the extended version worked so much better.

    So try the Extended Version... I'll probably wait for the Extended Two Towers as well rather than get the DVD release next week. And I agree with the poster who said Towers seemed fake and artificial - but it was still a good movie.

    I hope Hong Kong gets the extended Movies on screen - but I'm not holding my breath.

  128. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Then, they didn't just provide the unfinished deleted scenes on a menu on a separate disc, they integrated those scenes back into the original film along with newly recorded soundtrack material.

    That's good, of course, but can you name a reason why they had to sell two different editions to do that? If it's an hour of extra video, it could be stored as an extra track on the DVD, and selected from a menu. There is just no reason to sell the short version, then wait awhile, and tell everyone there is a longer version they should also buy.

    one with the theatrical release and minimal extras, and one with an extended version of the film and many different extras.

    Again, can you name any reason it is necesarry for them to sell two different versions (other than trying to squeeze every dollar they could, out of consumers)?

    Various conspiracy theorists won't believe such announcements, and given the history of the movie industry, I can understand why.

    Well, there is always the possibility that they are being sincere, but a few years later they will pull a George Lucas/Steven Sepilberg and decide that they want to add-in more special effects, digitally change something in the movie, or record entirely new scenes.

    Even better... LOTR prequals, 30 years later when LOTR has become a classic, the director has no talent left, and has to cash-in on crappy renditions of his old cash-cow.

    This has quickly turned into a Star Wars rant... Back to the point, their activites really do concern me, and make me weary of even spending a few dollars to rent the movies. In the end I probably will buy them, but I'll probably stay away for a few years after their popularity has died down, just to make sure I'm not in for any surprises. Then again, maybe the DVDs will disapear from store shelves by then, and I'll have forgetten about it.

    What it all comes down to, is a lot of questionable behaviors, that makes many people distrustful of the movie industry as a whole. It's really the same thing that caused the fall of the American auto industry, and numerous other industry problems both recent and in the distant past.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  129. psycho-billy cadillac by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    [engaging Super-Scary-Enthusastic mode]
    :-D :-D I like to turn *ALL* negatives. into *positives*! :-D :-D Let's think of the *positive* possibilities this presents! ! !!! ! (Ren is wearing the happy helmet)
    [Super-Scary-Enthusiastic mode OFF (before I break something)]

    But seriously, this needn't be so bad. All it means is: we have a reasonable excuse to buy the full (extended) DVD set when it comes out and...

    Magenta: And our world...will do the Time Warp...again!
    (I.e. We can, uh, watch the trilogy. again. ;-)

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  130. Re:I won't even see the original release in theatr by TheNumberSix · · Score: 1
    That's good, of course, but can you name a reason why they had to sell two different editions to do that? If it's an hour of extra video, it could be stored as an extra track on the DVD, and selected from a menu. There is just no reason to sell the short version, then wait awhile, and tell everyone there is a longer version they should also buy.
    The answer to your question is this: New Line told everyone straight up, BEFORE they released the first DVD that there would two versions. The first DVD would be strictly the threatrical version with no "new" extras. (The extras that are there were previously available on the LOTR Official site.)

    The second release, the "Extended" versions was for fans of the books/films.

    The reason they broke it up like that was because the video market demands a release on a faster cycle than PJ and New Line could release the Extended version, so they put out the theatrical verion.

    It's not any kind of trickery, they came right out and said this before the first one was released. "If you just want to add to your DVD collection, get the first one, if you are a LOTR fan, get the second one."
    --
    Never confuse feeling with thinking.
  131. rereleasing the movies by jdooley · · Score: 1

    oh great... and I just got the original release of TTT from BitTorrent burned onto CD's. Now your telling me I have to go and redownload the whole thing? Thanks alot... :)

  132. Which is When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When? Once each week for the two weeks prior to the opening of 'The Return of the King.'"

    I can hardly wait for the "Return of the King". I can't wait to see how it ends! I sure hope Sauron doesn't take over all of Middle Earth! That would be bad! I bet it will have a happy ending though where the guy gets the girl. Except the main character doesn't have a girl so maybe he will come out of the closet and it will end with Sam giving Frodo a hairy foot massage or something.

  133. One Film to Rule them all by bfree · · Score: 1

    My only question is will the ROTK be an extended edition in its initial state or will we have to wait another year before I can finally sit down in a cinema and watch the entire extended trilogy in one sitting? As it is, I had been waiting for the opportunity to see the entire trilogy in a cinema (and wondered when and if any cinema would do it) in a day. I had never really hoped that I would get to see the extended editions in the cinema so this is excellent news, I just hope that they get the ROTK out in an extended edition for the cinemas also. I'm sure that every (reasonably large) city going would have a cinema which would take on showing the full series daily in extended form for a few weeks (and it wouldn't matter whether they did it on ROTK release or a month or two after so those prints can travel). This could be one of those "cultural" experiences which shapes the future of cinematography! I remember going to see SW:ESB and SW:ROTJ for the first times in the cinema back to back with my dad and that was one of the greatest days of my childhood (I was about 9)! Pity he didn't feel up to doing the full 3 movie trilogy!

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  134. Re:how to avoid the bathroom while watching the mo by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Teach yourself how to write HTML Links:
    here

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  135. I'm shocked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have thought they would try to milk the older episodes by re-releasing them as extended? Who could have imagined that they would use fist two episodes to promote the third?? I'm speechless.

  136. And you're wrong about Bane by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    I forgot to add...

    3. Bane was found unconscious at the scene where several other ships had previously been destroyed. Bane was unconscious long before Neo and the Nebuchadnezzar's crew was picked up. This is made obvious by the crew's discussion about him later. He's been onboard for a while, and they hint that only he knows what really happened at the "massacre", but he's too ... unconscious to share what he knows.

  137. Great Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'm going to be flamed for this, but I don't care....*grins*

    <flamebait>
    This a great idea! Now I can NOT CARE about seeing the first two movies back to back, just in time to NOT CARE about seeing the third movie!
    </flamebait>

  138. or..... by jefu · · Score: 1

    You could just go read "Bored of the Rings". And given "Meet the Feebles" I think Peter Jackson is exactly the right person to bring it to the screen.