Slashdot Mirror


Warp Records Reject DRM, Go Bleep

DJ Phase writes "Warp Records, an independent label for electronic music (featuring artists such as Aphex Twin, Autechre, and Boards of Canada), has made their entire back catalog available thru Bleep, a new digital download service. Individual tracks are $1.35 for those of us in the USA, with EPs and full albums in the $4 to $10 price range. You can download Aphex Twin's rare, groundbreaking Hangable Auto Bulb EP for $4.29. To quote from the FAQ: 'We are at present the only store to offer very high quality MP3 files,' and 'Bleep music has no DRM or copy protection built in. We believe that most people like to be treated as customers and not potential criminals'."

565 comments

  1. IMPORTANT NEWS UPDATE!!!!!!! by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The goatse page is offline after the .cx NIC revoked their domain! (No, this isn't a trick!)

    More details here.

    1. Re:IMPORTANT NEWS UPDATE!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't'cha mean aboot

    2. Re:IMPORTANT NEWS UPDATE!!!!!!! by Zagar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Petition available.

      --
      YAFIRL (Yet another Free iPods referral link)
  2. I believe... by graveyardduckx · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe potential criminals should be treated like customers too.

    1. Re:I believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way! All criminals are potential customers!

    2. Re:I believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone know what P2P service has the most tracks from these guys? Thanks.

    3. Re:I believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slsk has always been the choice of IDM listeners. It's low-profile enough that the RIAA doesn't get involved, but if you're looking for rare stuff (especially IDM stuff, but most of the people on slsk are music fanatics, so other genres, too) slsk will get you way better results than kazaa's millions of members.

    4. Re:I believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's slsknet.org. Slsk.org got bought out and now installs a dialer.

    5. Re:I believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe potential criminals should be treated like customers too.

      Yeah, really... It's all those people who are on cocaine, ecstacy, LSD, and/or psilocybin that listen to this stuff anyways.

    6. Re:I believe... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? All criminals are potential EMPLOYEES! Gotta fill out management somehow, why not skip the formalities?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:I believe... by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1
      everyone is POTENTIAL criminal, because we all have the potential.

      no one should be punished for something they have the potential to do.

      there were already laws against piracy, all the DMCA does is take away rights.

  3. May not treat customers like criminals... by mgebbers · · Score: 5, Funny

    But given the color scheme on their website, they treat all their customers as if they wear sunglasses while using a computer.

    1. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention that scrolling thing. That's horrible. I'm running at 1600x1200, and the browser taking up ~1/2 the width. The text part is about 1/5 of *that*, and half the height. Why not just a standard HTML page?

    2. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by SnowZero · · Score: 1, Informative

      And in addition, its hard to use and generally annoying. They do win for having a website that looks more or less identical to some P2P sharing programs (notice there's even an order/download monitor window pane). I'd rather have a normal one that uses my screen size and scrollbar though.

    3. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Basehart · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Why not just a standard HTML page?"

      Because it was put together by TDR

      If you find anything "standard" after clicking the link I'll buy you a song (just kidding about that last bit btw).

    4. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Argh.
      For a moment I almost forgot why flash had such a bad reputation. Thanks for the reminder TDR.
      (macromedia should sue you)

    5. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because it was put together by TDR

      <instant submission to http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com>SWEETMUTHAOGAWHD!! </instant submission>

      I think I have retinal damage!

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    6. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      warp sell odd, idiosyncratic, exocentric music. Surely it's good that their website reflects this (or are you of the mind that they should peddle more of the bland, sameness that everyone else does?)

    7. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      The website arses up Konqueror 3.1.5 completely - no scrolling arrows even on 1024x768 {my LCD won't go any higher than that} with the panel hidden. Mozilla Firebird 0.7 at least shows the scrolling arrows -- if you hide the panel; but I still couldn't get a sound to come out of the thing.

      They may be using published standard for their audio files, but their web interface -- all I can say is GHICK!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    8. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by nazh · · Score: 1

      webpagesthatsuck.com does not accept submissions with sites from "webdesigners".

      Quote: No personal pages (personal pages are supposed to reflect the individual's personality, artistic freedom, and lack of taste -- a commercial site is about making money) or Web site designers (it would look like a conflict of interest).
      http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/

    9. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by nfotxn · · Score: 1

      I think this probably some of tDR's worst work. By comparison the Warpmart, the mail order store for Warp Records, is really great. With good search facility, colour-coding by artist and a pretty straight-forward interface. Although today Warp's servers are going a tad slow.

      --

      _nfotxn

    10. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      odd, idiosyncratic, exocentric music
      With the presumption you meant excentric rather than exocentric you seem to have a triple tautology there mister.

      I presume you dont mean exocentric mainly on the grounds that most Warp music fans of my acquaintance (I lived in Sheffield (UK) for a few years) would be more intro- than extro-verted :)

    11. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess "really great" is relative.

    12. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      What's non-standard about a single image tag saying:
      Error.
      Flash 5 Needed.
      Download.

      Maybe the grammar was a little off, and the font was kind of unusual, but it's just a little standard gif...

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? All I see is "Error. Flash 5 Needed. Download."

      Although I don't get how this sells any products.

    14. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Why indeed?

      Here's what the W3C thinks.

      Frames and XHTML, sheesh, these guys are amatuers.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    15. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Excuse me for replying to myself, but it gets worse.

      As others have mentioned, the damned thing doesn't work correctly in Gecko-based browsers. I was intrigued by the article, but with a website like that, they are not going to see any of my money.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    16. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by CowboyMeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's not a bit of flash in tht site. The hover-arrows are all javascript.

      Don't be so quick to comdemn flash, if someone wants to create a horrible website, they can do it using anything, even just lots of frames. Flash just gives them more options.

      As an example of a "good" flash site, see www.homestarrunner.com. They make creative use of flash, but the pages are still linkable.

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    17. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, I just about had a seisure.

      Thanks a LOT for that link!

    18. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you find anything "standard" after clicking the link I'll buy you a song (just kidding about that last bit btw).

      Uhh, if we take off the last "bit" you're going to buy him a son instead of a song.

    19. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      newsflash! homestarrunner isn't funny. it's retarded. the site isn't designed well, either- you think you're 'hip' and 'cutting-edge' for liking it. i believe anyone who likes that shit should have a full psychiatric evaluation, and then be booted repeatedly in the balls. piss off, you filthy little twit.

    20. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

      I made no comment as to the humor of the site, I was simply referring to how the site is technicaly done. It has the advantage of flash that it looks very clean, and the advantage of HTML that you can still link to the cartoons and such.

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    21. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Henry_Doors · · Score: 1

      and at 800x600 you can't see or scroll to much of the screen. Have they actually tested this with anything? Tried both Firebird 6.1 & IE 6.

      Nice idea but they won't be getting any of my money till they produce a useable website.

      --
      "I deny nothing, but doubt everything." Lord Byron
    22. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "excentric" isn't even a word, so I doubt he could have meant that. "Eccentric" maybe.

    23. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by kelp7 · · Score: 1

      Awww diddums.... did the nasty website hurt your poor eyes-y weyes-ys.... retinal damage? wuss........ oh, and the colour scheme is briliant...

    24. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [inspects docsource] Well, it starts with HTML and HEAD tags... that's "standard", right? :) ...but it's all downhill after that... good gods, some of the DOCSOURCE blinks in Netscape, I kid you not!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    25. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by kelp7 · · Score: 1

      what are you? an imbecile? inept? or just computer illiterate?

    26. Re:May not treat customers like criminals... by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      What are you? Completely lacking in a sense of humour?

      Oh, I get it, you're a self important dweeb.

  4. They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.magnatune.com

    This was even a story on here a couple months ago...

    1. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by SnowZero · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bleep claims to be the first to "provide high quality MP3s", which may be correct but is misleading. magnatude sells you FLAC files, which is CD quality and lets you make anything.

    2. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is not misleading. Their MP3's are high quality. They do not say 'CD quality'.

    3. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's misleading is the claim that they're the first to do what they do, implying that nobody else has done it better. In truth, Magnatune provides a source file that can be downgraded to a high quality MP3 if you desire to do so, while this service is claiming to be the first to provide high quality MP3s...

      Magnatune provides the technically better file, Bleep provides the ready-to-use file that most people would convert their Magnatune files anyway... so Bleep's claim of "first" is pushing aside Magnatune on only a technicality, not a dramatic difference.

    4. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume that everyone reading the marketing statement knows how to make their own MP3's (and for that matter decompress FLAC files). Most don't. Most just download to their favorite MP3 player or software and go. So Magnatune's service is going to be next to worthless for them.

    5. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy pedantic, nerd boy. With game like that I bet you get all the pussy.

    6. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't, jackass.

      Magnatune SELLS FLACs and vorbis files. They give away 128k mp3s of all their songs for free.

      How is that worthless?

    7. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, thanks. Bleep's site come up in netscape all jammed over to the right with stuff overwriting itself and I couldn't see anything. magnatune's site works great.

    8. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Magnatune also provide very high quality MP3's.
      300kb/s or more.
      I suggest you try buy something and see for yourself.

    9. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but Magnatune doesn't quite have the back catalogue that Warp does...

    10. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by GORby_ · · Score: 1

      In fact (from magnatune website): All songs are available in MP3, CD-quality WAV, OGG, FLAC and MP3-VBR

      This means that they aren't even the first to provide HQ MP3.

      I like the fact however that this kind of thing actually seems to work. If you look at magnatune you'll see quite a lot of artists listed, which means that there is at least moderate interest from artists (albeit mostly artists unknown to me). I didn't immediately see any famous artists, but hey, you've got to start somewhere...

      I wonder what would happen when a famous end-of-contract artist suddenly decided to switch to a record company like magnatune...

    11. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by famebait · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know who was first, but bleep is certianly not the only one. eMusic sells
      192kb mp3s at very reasonable rates (provioded you actually download your mothly quota).

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    12. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying I can't claim to be the first to hammer a nail through my dick, then set it on fire, because other people have not done it, and not doing it is obviously better? Yeah, you're an ass. Shut the fuck up.

    13. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Llurien · · Score: 1

      Hmm, actually Magnatune gives you a choice between several formats. Among them are uncompressed .wav, high quality .ogg, and ofcourse, high quality mp3.

    14. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you can claim that one. I believe you sight unseen.

    15. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by n-tone · · Score: 1

      Of course, they aren't really the first label to sell MP3's but the great thing with Bleep.com is that Warp Records isn't an unknown small independant label like Magnatune. Wrap Records is very famous in the music electronic industry.

      If Bleep.com is successful, many medium-sized labels will launch their equivalents of Bleep.com.It will the completly change the online music distribution because for the first time, you'll be able to bypass the big DRM-only music store!

    16. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They're not lying, so what's the problem?

    17. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by richieb · · Score: 1
      Emusic has been providing un-DRMed MP3 files for few years now. Under current pricing they sell tracks at about $0.25 per track.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    18. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Informative
      Just bought some music from magnatune, this is what they offered:
      The complete album is available in these formats:
      • 44k/16bit WAV : 622meg zip file of perfect quality WAV files.
      • FLAC : 314meg zip file of perfect quality FLAC files. (about FLAC)
      • OGG : 84meg zip file of high quality OGG files. (about OGG)
      • 128kb MP3 : 56meg zip file of 128kb MP3 files.
      • MP3 VBR : 74meg zip of high quality MP3 VBR files. (about VBR MP3)

      As well as a listing of each track, downloadable as MP3 or WAV. Note they don't claim 128kbps MP3 is "high quality"; note they do offer "high quality" VBR MP3 (lame --alt-preset standard iirc, not some unnamed encoder with some crappy badly tuned settings); note they also offer Ogg Vorbis; note they even cater for people like me with FLAC, which frankly makes me want to have their babies. You should too :P
    19. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by oneade · · Score: 1

      You'd think they'd make a big deal of providing a lossless format. But from the quick look I've take nowhere does it mention the FLAC format is used.

    20. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 1

      I have heard nothing but bad things about that service. They apparantly switched to some kindof download client, which is unreliable. They also no longer offer "unlimited" service, but before this was done, they banned many users for downloading "too much" although this was never mentioned in any of the EULAs. Finally, they censor their bulletin boards rediculously, so even if many other users are having the same problems as yourself, you'll never see them.

    21. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which frankly makes me want to have their babies. Tom, you are very fucked up.

    22. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True
      But Magnatune isn't a real label like warp.
      You cant go to the recordshop and buy their records, so they have nothing to lose.

      Whats great about this is that for the "first time" you have a legal way of buying real records in high quality with no drm, one could argue that emusic was the first to do that, but not magnatune! (there are lots of cd-r labels selling/giving high quality digital music online)

      This is the "first time" you can buy classic releases by musical pioneers that made some of the best and most groundbreaking alternative music for the last 15 years!

    23. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by TPFH · · Score: 1

      The download client worked until they announced that they would no longer be offering "unlimited downloading" after October. After that point everyone on the system started downloading like crazy, trying to get as much out of the system before the end. My account got canceled on the very last day, which meant they gave me my $9.95 back for the month of October. I don't know how the service has been since then.

      I think they got taken over by another company. To be honest, 40 downloads a month for $9.95 isn't that bad. I just wish it was a little better. Especially because I listen to weird music and some albums have a lot more tracks than others. So I'm holding off on re-joining for a while to see if they will offer a better deal. I'm hoping others are doing the same, and that the company does not go bankrupt. I like the idea, it is just 40 songs per month is a bit disappointing after getting practically unlimited downloads.

      Also, nearly all the music they provide is indepenedent music that I usually cannot find on KaZaA.

      They took down their message boards at the same time they announced the forthcoming changes. However, maybe someone out there has an listserv or independent bulleton board for users past and present?

      They did have a lot of good music and I would very much like to re-join.

      --
      This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
    24. Re:They aren't the first. Magnatune people! by k12linux · · Score: 1

      They say the average yearly income for their artists is around $1500. While this isn't much, most bands actually end up in DEBT to their label. Also, there is nothing in Magnatune's contract to prevent a band from selling their own CDs or making deals with other labels... just that Magnatune also gets to continue selling the songs they've already given them.

  5. Nice decision, and great music by cpu_fusion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thank goodness it is Warp Records I get to reward for avoiding DRM, and not K-Tel.

    1. Re:Nice decision, and great music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warp is one of the few labels I support by buying their CDs. Nice to see I can support them DL'ing mp3s now.

      For those who don't know Warp, I suggest you check them out. Some of the most creative electronic artists are on Warp Records.

    2. Re:Nice decision, and great music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are making a huge mistake, DRM is the only what to go wieh offing digital media on the web.

  6. and there's only one problem by David+E.+Smith · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Nobody has ever heard of most of these artists.

    I skimmed through the whole list of artists (which includes a number of artists that don't have a whole album, only one track on a compilation CD). I'm not an expert on music in general, and especially not on dance/techno/electronica/whatever the heck this stuff is, but I have only heard of two of the 'bout 100 artists they even list.

    This is all well and good and The Way It Should Be (TM), but it's not exactly a major breakthrough on the scale of iTunes changing formats, or Vivendi Universal offering MP3s, etc.

    1. Re:and there's only one problem by 1984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might not have heard of them, but lots of people have. Lots of people who might not be avid Slashdot readers or care much about the issues usually discussed here. And they're artists who -- until now -- haven't generally been available on other download services. For those of thus who like the stuff Warp puts out, this is a good thing.

    2. Re:and there's only one problem by prockcore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and especially not on dance/techno/electronica/whatever the heck this stuff is, but I have only heard of two of the 'bout 100 artists they even list.

      That would explain why you haven't heard of most of those artists. I couldn't name you any Country Music artists other than Garth Brooks... that doesn't mean a thing.

    3. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean *you* haven't heard of these artists. I've been listening to experimental electronic music for, hell, more than a decade, and I own most of the CDs that Warp ever put out. Warp is like the grandaddy of the "intelligent electronic listening music" (IDM, EBM, "braindance", whatever) and it's cool to see this. Some of that old vinyl goes for hundred's of $$$.

      It would be cool to see this stuff on iTunes too but this is great.

    4. Re:and there's only one problem by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, so you think it's good because you've heard of it? I appreciate that there are certainly some good, popular, major label bands. But I've found lots of great bands on MagnaTune. I see no reason why Bleep can't do something similar. Non-DRM encumbered music, high quality recordings, and good music are a big draw for me. Being able to preview and play through bands and genres that I might otherwise not hear on the radio is an even bigger draw. Surfing around on MagnaTune is a FUN activity for me - it has brought back some of the joy I used to take in music that has really felt dead to me in recent years.

    5. Re:and there's only one problem by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nobody has ever heard of most of these artists.

      Don't you mean YOU have never heard of any of these artists? Warp Records is, by far, the most influential and important electronic music label on earth. Autechre, Squarepusher, Aphex Twin, Boards of Canada, Plaid, Tortoise, Oval, Nightmares on Wax, are all on the top of the pile as far as really good electronic music is concerned. Just because YOU have never heard of them doesn't mean nobody else has... walk through the halls of the school I go to and you're just as likely to hear an Autechre track as you are Britney Spears.

      --
      sig.
    6. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I couldn't name you any Country Music artists other than Garth Brooks... that doesn't mean a thing.

      Not true. It means 2 things:

      1) You're less likely to be a G.W. Bush fan.
      2) God doesn't hate you.

    7. Re:and there's only one problem by dietz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uhm, not exactly.

      Warp was (and to some degree still is) THE pioneering label for experimental electronic music. Aphex Twin, who you might not have heard of, is definitely a major influence in a lot of music today. With the increasing use of synths in modern music, you can even hear Warp's influence in music that isn't strictly electronic.

      I think it would be fair to say that Warp is the "Blue Note" of jazz music, but I admit that I don't know much at all about jazz, so that might be a dumb thing to say.

      Warp records (and Brian Behlendorf, head of the Apache project!) are even responsible for the name of the genre on the label. It's called "IDM" which is short for "Intelligent Dance Music", a name that sounds incredibly stupid and pompous now, especially since much of the music categorized in that genre isn't danceable. But in a post to his new "idm" mailing list back in 1993, brian said he made up the name because of Warp's "Artificial Intelligence" compilations.

      Anyway, Warp isn't a major label, but it's defintiely one of the huge, influential indies, so it's nothing to sneeze at.

    8. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad you havent heard of them, you are missing out on some seriously class material, ie not up there with your coveted britney spears, and sum41, but then again not everyone can apprectiate the likes of autechre.
      if you want one of the best cd's ever created, then do yourself a favour and check out tri repetae++

    9. Re:and there's only one problem by BackwardEngineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, why bother commenting if this doesnt affect you? As an avid fan of Squarepusher, Boards of Canada, Aphex Twin and the like, I am overjoyed to hear that I am able to hear some of the rare tracks.

      To say that this isn't a major breakthrough is wrong. It's a record label, maybe not a HUGE record label that wants to rake in all the money it can get its grubby hands on, but a record label none the less. They are opening up the audio archives and allowing people to hear songs that probably only a few have heard.

      And on that note, this is the perfect chance for people to preview these artists. Who knows, maybe they will start to like Intelligent Dance Music?

    10. Re:and there's only one problem by darkov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah I'm heartbroken that I can't download Brittany Spears from the service. Instead I can buy the really cool bands that I listened to as a young teenager. I can't help you if you haven't got taste. Maybe you should invest in some of the files offered on the service.

      The point is that this is the way that songs should be sold on the internet - whole back catalogues offered by the labels themselves. Maybe one day we can have some API that will let companies offer many labels' music from one site, but right now the lowest-common-denominator approach taken by Apple and others will not promote competition and better deals for customers.

    11. Re:and there's only one problem by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      You are not everybody, therefore the fact that you've not heard of these acts does not mean: That nobody has heard of them, that they aren't better than most of the "popular" artists, or that it is some sort of problem. Of the music I "own" most people have never heard of half of the artists, a ratio sustained even if you just look at recent releases.

      I'd be better able to show my rebuttal if the page would load. I think the only actual problem is that their servers can't cope with a good Slashdotting.

    12. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, if he were a Bush fan he'd be able to name those traitor whore commie bitches, The Dixie Chicks.

    13. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it would be fair to say that Warp is the "Blue Note" of jazz music

      Actually Blue Note is the Blue Note of jazz music.

      I meant to say Warp might be considered the Blue Note of electronic music.

      But again, I don't know much about jazz, so that might be dumb.

    14. Re:and there's only one problem by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Warp puts out some great stuff. Autechre is really good stuff, my favorite out of everything Warp puts out. Warp tends to put out "electronica" type stuff - if you're not into it, you wouldn't know.

      There's millions of people out there that DO know these artists.. Warp is a big name.

      If you were looking for Britney Spears or Puff Daddy in that list, you're looking at the wrong label. There's some really amazing music being made out there when you look past MTV and your "Alternative Rock" radio stations.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    15. Re:and there's only one problem by Cordath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh come one! They've got "Meat Beat Manifesto"!!! They were on the freakin original Matrix soundtrack! Have you been living under a rock? How about Nine Inch Nails? You've heard of them right? They've been on MTV and Much Music!!! (I admit, NiN isn't quite up to the same standards as some of the other artists here, but you must have heard of him!) They've got Philip Glass, who has written tonnes of music including an alternate operatic score for Jean Cocteau's "Beauty and the Beast". (which owns Disney's version BTW) He also scored the Qatsi trilogy, but those are art films. Well out of your baliwick obviously.

      Electronica isn't everyone's cup o' tea, but it is one of the few musical genres that is currently exploring new possibilities at an explosive rate. (Unlike Rock, Pop, Metal, Country, Rap, etc. which each have a little going on in the fringes, but have mostly stagnated.) Electronica is also one of the genre's that most music stores neglect to a shameless degree. Even when you can find the CD's you want, Electronica is often priced well above most other genre's. The prices on this site are simply fantastic by comparison!

      Aphex Twin (Richard D. James) is... unique. Some of his stuff is simply amazing. He creates truly original music that's pushing out frontiers left right and center. Then, every once and a while, he gets the urge to actually sing some lyrics... Ye gods!

      I wish the milkman would deliver my milk, in the morning.
      I wish the milkman would deliver my milk, when I'm yawning.
      I would like some milk from the milkman's wife's tits.
      I would like some milk from the milkman's wife's tits.
      I would like some milk from the milkman's wife's tits.
      .
      .
      .

      (He goes on for a while. You get the picture.)

      Let's just say it's a good thing that he usually keeps his yap shut and leave it at that. It just goes to show that musical and poetic genious don't always go hand and hand.

      Auterche is another great electronica band that was, coincidentally on the Pi soundtrack with Aphex Twin and a few others. (Great movie despite the bad math.) There is a tonne of stuff here that I'd love to be able to buy legitimately. Frankly, if this service offered music in a lossless format I'd be blowing a wad on it. Perhaps in the future...

    16. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can search Pitchforkmedia.com for WARP and read reviews of some of their releases. Among the highest rated are:
      Squarepusher
      Boards of Canada
      Two Lone Swordsmen
      Plaid
      Prefuse 73

    17. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the subject of bush, check this mp3 out

      it's hilarious

    18. Re:and there's only one problem by SpookWarfare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nobody has ever heard of most of these artists. By an odd rule of nature and society (popularity being inverse to quality) you'll find the music to be excellent.

    19. Re:and there's only one problem by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      If you have never heard of Aphex Twin I truly pity you. His music consists of some of the most brilliant works in all of the electronic genre. I suggest checking out the video to Windowlicker as done by Chris Cunningham, it is a masterwork in every sense.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    20. Re:and there's only one problem by xutopia · · Score: 1

      well don't be fooled. There are lots of people who listen to these bands.

    21. Re:and there's only one problem by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      They've got Philip Glass, who has written tonnes of music including an alternate operatic score for Jean Cocteau's "Beauty and the Beast". (which owns Disney's version BTW) He also scored the Qatsi trilogy, but those are art films.

      Not to mention The Truman Show's score, which many more people have heard. :-p

    22. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop listening to your Clear Channel radio station for a day and get out there and hear something different. A lot of people have obviously heard of these groups (including me).

    23. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Okay, so you think it's good because you've heard of it?

      Duh-freakin'-uh.

    24. Re:and there's only one problem by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not a big electronic music fan and I really like Aphex Twin. They did the soundtrack for the movie Pi and helped make the movie trippy and great.

      -B

    25. Re:and there's only one problem by spectral · · Score: 1

      god, squarepusher is crap.. Maybe just the thing I went to in Osaka with someone whose name I forget (Andrew Weatherall maybe?), Tim Deluxe, Squarepusher and Kraftwerk.. but Tim Deluxe got everyone in to the room, Squarepusher forced them back out, and then they came back in for Kraftwerk. I really didn't like his style, but when he started swearing out the audience for not getting involved/making noise/whatever, I'll never give him another shot again. Swearing at your audience is never a good thing.

    26. Re:and there's only one problem by jdbo · · Score: 1

      That's funny, the second I saw the article title I thought of several people who would want to know this, and ASAP.

      As another poster pointed out, Warp is an artistically respected label, and a relatively popular one at that. Many people spend $$$ on their output, esp. the limited-edition EPs.

      More importantly, musicians (who are certainly more concerned with being hip to their scene than random /. users) know who Warp is, and what they're up to.

      Just because Warp isn't one of the big 5, doesn't mean that this lack significance.

    27. Re:and there's only one problem by edhall · · Score: 1
      I can buy the really cool bands that I listened to as a young teenager.

      Sigh. Most of the artists on Warp weren't even born when I was a young teenager. But unlike the grandparent post, I've heard of (and heard) most of them. The influence of Warp artists on electronic music is second to none, and no one can claim knowledge of the genre who hasn't heard of them. And given the influence electronic music now has on popular music in general, I'd say that Warp has importance far beyond its size. Brittany may never have heard of Autechre, but you can bet that several of the producers on her last album have.

      -Ed
    28. Re:and there's only one problem by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that Autechre?...and Orbital.

    29. Re:and there's only one problem by euxneks · · Score: 1

      walk through the halls of the school I go to and you're just as likely to hear an Autechre track as you are Britney Spears.

      I really, truly am sorry for you.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    30. Re:and there's only one problem by darkov · · Score: 1

      Man, you are old. But maybe you're not that old. Cabaret Voltaire (who I am sure were on Warp but I can't find them on the web site) are pretty old guys - they should be in their 50's now.

      The sad fact is most people are pretty ignorant. They wouldn't have a clue about the heritage of their favourite music or how much their favourite band owes to some obscure artist from 20 or 30 years back.

    31. Re:and there's only one problem by Basehart · · Score: 1

      It was mostly Clint Mansell, with tracks by Orbital, Autechre, Aphex Twin, Roni Size, Massive Attack, David Holmes, Gus Gus, Banco de Gaia, Psilonaut and Spacetime Continuum, if I remember rightly ;-)

    32. Re:and there's only one problem by two.oh · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't say, "Nobody", because i'm a dire Warp Music fan, as are many people around the world (specifically Europe).

    33. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bulk of the music in Pi was actually Clint Mansell, though he would list Aphex Twin as a big influence, I'm sure.

    34. Re:and there's only one problem by Skunkhead · · Score: 1

      Its certainly true that none of this stuff hit the top ten anywhere recently, but IMHO you will never get the big players to release their stuff un-DRMed. The only way to go is the way that warp has went, to release their stuff directly.

      The "major breakthrough" is going to arrive when more and more labels go this way, so these artists get the money they deserve, and not that huge middleman...

    35. Re:and there's only one problem by Carthag · · Score: 1
      Actually Clint Mansell (formerly of Pop Will Eat Itself) did the songs that were composed for the movie. There was an Aphex Twin (it's one guy, by the way) track on the soundtrack though (Bucephalus Bouncing Ball).

      But yeah. Great soundtrack, I really like Clint's songs too.

    36. Re:and there's only one problem by FauxReal · · Score: 1
      Well, you're obviously exaggerating a bit there. I happen to be a huge fan of Warp Reocords. You're fortunate for finally hearing of the label.

      They have a very varied catalouge of music as well... not just stuff teenagers on drugs might listen to. In fact I think there is a lot of rather sophisticated music there.

      I really don't know what you listen to, but I'm going to suggest some downtempo artists you might like. Between djing nightclubs/lounges and playing in my friend's cafe or at an art opening; I've only gotten compliments and inquiries into what I'm playing.

      Nightmares On Wax "Carboot Soul" (Smooth, lots of analog instruments, great beats

      Plaid Anything by them, thier remix of Bjork's (heard of her?) "All is Full of Love" is probably one of the best Bjork remixes ever.

      Anti Pop Consortium "The Blue Series (vs. Matthew Ship)" Cerebral and political hiphop, this particular album is a great exploration in jazz & hiphop.

      Broadcast I just saw them in concert recently not knowing what they sounded like, very tight instrumentation, hard to pin down thier style but the're deffinately jazz influenced. The lead singer has a dreamlike voice and looks like some sort of ice princess.

      Boards of Canada Thier sound is probably the most mellow of the list. More downtempo beats and grooves that I'm sure has been played in more than a few upscale health spas.

      Prefuse 73 "Vocal Studies + Uprock Narratives" He mixes old and new school hiphop, soul and funk w/ new editing technology + his own style, and produced one of the best albums of 2003.

      There's a lot more, and my descriptions aren't the best... but please give the label a try. Another good listen is Stereolab is another good listen, layered guitar and analog synth driven music with a great female singer. If you like Radiohead you might like this... though its not quite the same.

    37. Re:and there's only one problem by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1
      while being on a major movie's soundtrack gets people visibility, I can't say that it makes the average person that's not interested in the genre any more likely to recognize the name.

      after all, how many people outside of the Electronic music scene know that the blood rave song in Blade is "Confusion" by New Order, much less that it's the Reconstruction remix by Pump Panel?

    38. Re:and there's only one problem by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1
      "Intelligent Dance Music", a name that sounds incredibly stupid and pompous now, especially since much of the music categorized in that genre isn't danceable.

      A friend of mine once said that the reason why they call it IDM, is because if you're intelligent, you don't try to dance to it. :p

    39. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just poked around Magnatunes, and overall, the stuff is decent. I'm going to buy a couple CD's just to support them ... even though they're giving away low-quality (128kb) MP3s.

      They get my vote if only because they'er the only ones who acknowledge that 128kb is *LOW-FIDELITY*.

    40. Re:and there's only one problem by Fryth · · Score: 1

      Squarepusher's albums are top-notch but his live performance is relatively lacking. I was disappointed too when I went to see him, much more impressed with his long time opener Luke Vibert. All the Pusher did was hook up a bass to some really crazy effects, and played random notes.

    41. Re:and there's only one problem by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 1

      Richard H Kirk (ex Cabaret Voltaire) had a fantastic record on Warp years back (the name of which completely escapes me at the moment) and yes he is very old :)

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
    42. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't help you if you haven't got taste. Maybe you should invest in some of the files offered on the service.

      Exactly. Only those without taste will invest in the files offered on the service.
      If I want to listen to video game music I'll just play a video game.

      PS - It's a joke people. Live with it.

    43. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Anti-Pop Consortium!

    44. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never listened to Gospel music, have you?
      It's like Country with a Choir, and it's all you could get in Christian music for years.

      I swear, it always bothered me as a kid to hate so much music that just wanted to sing nicely about God. Made me feel all sacreligious before my time.
      F'ing country music...

    45. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're into electronic music, you have heard from them

    46. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nine Inch Nails is not on Warp. You may be confused because a number of albums by Warp records artists (including EP7 and some of the early Squarepusher) were released in the U.S. by Nothing Records a number of years ago, and Nothing Records is run by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails.

    47. Re:and there's only one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dood, tortoise is on thrilljockey... they rule. my buddy works for thrill jockey and I have like 10 tortoise and sea and cake posters on my walls yum.

    48. Re:and there's only one problem by hime · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Only those without taste will invest in the files offered on the service.
      If I want to listen to video game music I'll just play a video game.


      PS - It's a joke people. Live with it.


      Right after you try to be funny. Or creative.


      Anyone who wants to dis IDM hasn't heard Boards of Canada, or any of Aphex's better work. Get with it already.

    49. Re:and there's only one problem by Cordath · · Score: 1

      NiN might not be on the Warp label, but they are on Bleep. Check the site.

    50. Re:and there's only one problem by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  7. Re:Criminals by RobPiano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They wouldn't regularly be pirated and be resold if they weren't already pirates themselves.

    I plan to buy atleast two albums from this place tomorrow when I go to work and can download them faster.

    I like the genre already, and I apperciate the token respect.

  8. Mod up please by boomgopher · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    :D :D Good stuff dude

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  9. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Been reading about this on the IDM list .. and just when I had written Warp of as a bunch of old-timers.

    Although I own most of the Warp CD back-catalog already (yes I'm trying to impress all you spotters out there) I look forward to emptying my wallet of cash on all the old vinyl tunes I never bought.

    And I can listen on my Mac, my Zaurus, and my linux machine, no need to do the time-consuming DRMBULLSHIT->MP3 conversions!!!

    (PS: I get a kick out of the folks who now refuse to buy MP3s because they aren't as "full sounding" as CDs. Didn't we go through this already with vinyl???? I'm happy to listen to MP3s on my shitty MP3 player and shitty headphones, thanks.)

    1. Re:wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well here is a laughing riot for you, I still don't own a cd player(obviously I have cdrom in my computer, but that is for cdroms, right?).

    2. Re:wow! by centralizati0n · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what about us with "real" set ups? Maybe just a sound-card hooked up to a mixer to a nice pair of numark headphones or something, but I can hear the difference between CDs/HiQual Mp3s versus vinyl. Then again, if you encode straight from vinyl and encoded at say... 88 khz and 524 kbits, you would get higher than CD quality. Besides, it is a record label, and they should have access to the masters, right? (then again it is techno/electronica, mostly done at 44khz and the equivalent of 320 kbits mp3 encoding anyways, so why argue for electronica vinyl/mp3? Why not classical vinyl/mp3?)

    3. Re:wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those folks are probably the ones who forget to put lame encoding on their mp3s. That would probably explain a lot.

    4. Re:wow! by Threni · · Score: 1

      > if you encode straight from vinyl and encoded at say... 88 khz and 524 kbits,
      > you would get higher than CD quality.

      Yeah, and without those irritating high frequencies. Instead you'll be listening to distortion straight from the turntable, speed variations, a touch of feedback and, unless it's a record thats being played for the very first time, some crackle and surface noise.

      > Why not classical vinyl/mp3?)

      Because MP3s sound even worse than vinyl. I MP3 up my classical stuff so I can listen to them when I'm out/at work, but it's not what I listen to at home. Going to the effort of recording huge choirs and organs and so on, then applying lossy compression....ugh. No thanks.

    5. Re:wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a kick out of the folks who now refuse to buy MP3s because they aren't as "full sounding" as CDs. Didn't we go through this already with vinyl????

      No, we didn't. You need a really good sound system to tell vinyl from CD. You can tell MP3 from CD on any system. Of course, if you don't care, you don't care, but generally having a good ear is considered to be a good thing.

    6. Re:wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a kick out of the folks who now refuse to buy MP3s because they aren't as "full sounding" as CDs.

      How about listening to the argument against MP3 before dismissing it? Most of the people who won't buy MP3 for quality reasons do so because transcoding to other formats means a large drop in quality. Your MP3 files will be horrible as soon as there's some new format-du-jour.

    7. Re:wow! by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      No, we didn't. You need a really good sound system to tell vinyl from CD. You can tell MP3 from CD on any system. Of course, if you don't care, you don't care, but generally having a good ear is considered to be a good thing.

      Then again, most people can tell vinyl from CD if they have a really crappy or even mid-range sound system ;)

      That's really the difference. CDs sound fairly good on even pretty bad hardware, and MP3s sound ok if you're in poor listening conditions (ie as background music in the office, where I sit in a cubical farm with a lot of external noise). The only time vinyl sounds good is when you have a good system and take very good care of your records. Many (if not most) people have never heard vinyl on a really good setup, and even some of the people that prefer vinyl prefer it for completely different reasons from the typical audiophile. And other people are simply analog junkies.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    8. Re:wow! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Mid quality or better MP3 sounds good enoguh for most people. It will be magnitudes better than FM radio. Replace the headphones that came with your mp3 player with a decent set and it will sound very good. I recommend anything that has neodynium magnets. I currently ave a set of Sone street style that sound good, are comfortable, and go behind the head so they don't mess up your hair.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    9. Re:wow! by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      Then again, if you encode straight from vinyl and encoded at say... 88 khz and 524 kbits, you would get higher than CD quality.
      I don't understand this. Record player = snap, crackle, and pop. I have never heard anyone who's able to keep their needle completely free from dust, their records completely free of dust and scratches, their records in completely unworn, brand-new condition (i.e. never been played). Yes, in theory the sound of an analog record might be more "natural," but it's impossible to reproduce that sound in its pristine condition. By its very nature, the analog playback medium introduces noise that isn't on the original recording. So where's the benefit? Besides, most of those 180 gram vinyl records all the purists are buying for $25 these days were originally recorded on digital equipment anyway.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    10. Re:wow! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'll take the occasional Rice Krispies[tm] effect over the fact that remastering for CD dumps the whole top and bottom end of the auditory spectrum. In fact, I find classical music on CD sounds so weak, after being used to it including the full concert hall ambience on vinyl and tape, that I can't stand it even over radio (yes, I can hear the media differences even via the lame sound of broadcast).

      That said, for everyday use MP3s are just fine (it's not like I care about the quality that much when it's being a substitute for radio anyway). Tho I've noticed that MP3s made from vinyl have richer tone and better reproduction of highs and lows, than do MP3s made from CDs.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  10. Re:Mp3? Bleh by ColMustard · · Score: 0

    Why not use Ogg Vorbis?

    Because nobody cares about vorbis outside of its community of 1056 members. The standard for DRM-free music is MP3. That simple.

    --
    Moof.
  11. At last! by HalfFlat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unencumbered, high quality digital music. With an explicit 'we choose not to treat customers like slime' policy. This is the sort of service I've been waiting for.

    iTunes didn't cut it on either point, but it was moot anyway since I'm forbidden from buying from them in the first place due to geography.

    Newer compression schemes may be superior to mp3, but as far as accessibility is concerned, mp3 is hard to beat. Nearly anything will play it with absolutely no hassles, including (most importantly for me) your average linux distribution and the iPod. The only thing that would make this perfect would be if there were an option for downloading the music in a lossless format, so one can recode to one's prefered compression scheme.

    Now the only question is, is there anything there that I want to listen to?

    1. Re:At last! by Agent+Green · · Score: 1

      Then why not offer different compression schemes for different folks? Works for Magnatune, and they've got some pretty good stuff.

      Good .oggs and ham for me, please. :)

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    2. Re:At last! by hayds · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I cant see companies offering downloads in lossless format anytime in the near future, it would cost them way too much. AFAIK, typical lossless audio codecs only have a compression ratio of about .5.

      For a busy site, there is a huge difference between customers downloading an album in 40Mb of MP3 and downloading an album in 350Mb of FLAC or whatever. They would need way more bandwidth, way more disk space, way more infrastructure.

      Considering that most people couldnt tell the difference, it just wouldnt be worth their while.

    3. Re:At last! by steveha · · Score: 2, Informative

      I cant see companies offering downloads in lossless format anytime in the near future

      You can if you visit magnatune.com, since they offer FLAC and even WAV files, as well as Ogg Vorbis and MP3. You could, if you were insane, even download all four formats.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:At last! by Gubbe · · Score: 2, Informative
      I cant see companies offering downloads in lossless format anytime in the near future
      From the Bleep FAQ:

      "We are also considering selling other files formats such as the second generation of lossy formats such as AAC or ogg or even lossless compressed formats such as FLAC or Monkeysaudio. If people are willing to pay a premium for the bandwidth cost they incur, then even 24bit versions of files could be sold."
    5. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and now watch Warp Records get warezed into oblivion, and watch the RIAA say "I told you so".

    6. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, their site tells they are considering ACC, ogg, FLAC or MonkeyAudio. Wait and see...

    7. Re:At last! by desolation+angel · · Score: 1

      If you browse their web site, Warp says it may offer lossless formats depending upon the level of interest in these formats. They will have to charge more for these formats to cover their bandwidth costs.

      --
      This time I could be arsed.
    8. Re:At last! by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      Yes it would cost more to provide losslessly compressed files, but they could charge more for those who choose them. The people who find it important to have lossless files are likely to be willing to pay the extra cost.

      (Before you nitpickers nitpick this, by "lossless" above I mean lossless compared to the CD. I already know that CD itself is lossy compared to the original analog source.)

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    9. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! A 0.5 compression ratio? You mean 50%, aka 0.5? Cool! I didn't know FLAC cut the size of music in half, I always thought it did less than that.

    10. Re:At last! by awol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now the only question is, is there anything there that I want to listen to?

      I would go so far as to take 20$ from my wallet and pick the least objectionable $20 worth of stuff just to be able to use the example to fsck off the DRM weenies. In fact I probably will.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    11. Re:At last! by ratamacue · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Considering that most people couldnt tell the difference

      Being able to tell the difference is really besides the point. Lossless is better simply because it's an exact duplicate of the original, master digital copy. If you have the original master, you can make first-generation mp3's or convert to any other audio format with just a few clicks -- and you can always go back to the master. It's the holy grail. Vendors will advertise this advantage, and it's only a matter of time before the public gains at least a basic understanding of lossless vs. lossy compression. (A good analogy for Joe Sixpack would be CD-quality audio vs. analog cassette tapes.)

      As you said, the only thing holding lossless back is bandwidth and disk space. Eventually, when bandwidth and disk space get big/cheap enough, lossless will take over. Lossy will stick around for a while, but as time goes on its uses will be eclipsed by the evolution of bandwidth and disks.

    12. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the original digital source. Unless you actually mean the live acoustic music.

      Besides CDs are almost as good as it gets. A little more dymanic range wouldn't hurt, but as of yet there exists no CD with has more then 80dB (though most are in the 50dB-60dB range) in dynamic range, still leaving another 10dB to go (the LSB contains white noise to mask the pattern noise that comes from decimation).

    13. Re:At last! by SlaterSan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Might I suggest Aphex Twin's "Come to Daddy" or "Girl/Boy EP" CD?

      Another good choice would be:
      Boards of Canada's "Music Has The Right To Children"

      I'd offer a link, but the site doesn't seem to lend itself to it.

    14. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Majority of people really don't care about this. They can't hear the difference between lossy or lossless on their boomboxes or $200 mini stereos. It's the hardware that needs to get better for less not only the source...

    15. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boards of Canada's "Music Has The Right To Children"
      is a gem. I vote for this one :-)

    16. Re:At last! by labratuk · · Score: 1

      I would suggest Autechre's LP5 and Peel sessions volume 2.

      Easy intros. Plus very good albums/eps.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    17. Re:At last! by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      As I was saying, being able to tell the difference is besides the point.

    18. Re:At last! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Newer compression schemes may be superior to mp3, but as far as accessibility is concerned, mp3 is hard to beat.

      Let's see.. pocket mp3 players from the past 5 years, portable cd players, car stereos, dvd players,boomboxes,pda's,cellphones,and computers.

      AAC and everything else can't touch the portability of the mp3 file... and never will, as they all have 5 years of catching up to do. Hell you can get the old oritional RIO mp3 player for dirt most places, I have seen them for $5.00 at garage sales where the kid has upgraded twice cince he owned that one.

      basically if you are offereing anything but an mp3 that will play in even the oldest mp3 player, you are doomed.

      Warp at least has the right idea.... iTunes simply has a captive market of ipod owners... nothing more and anything that uses WMA files will be a major joke.

      mp3 are not perfect, but there is a crap-load more devices that play them for very very little money. It's the defacto standard no matter if people like it or not.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:At last! by FromWithin · · Score: 1

      Boards of Canada indeed. Unique.

      I would also recommend the second album by LFO.

    20. Re:At last! by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      You're spot on; I do my best to make sure all my music is in FLAC format; it's what I rip to and it's what I try to download (from legitimate or *cough* sources). It's not because I really notice any difference, or even pretend I can; it's because I don't have to worry about what encoder settings to use, what version of lame or oggenc, whether MusePack or AAC really the better format. I don't even have to worry significantly over what lossless format I choose because I can change whenever I like.

      If I get a portable music player, I can *trivially* encode them to the best format it supports (e.g. 64kbps Ogg Vorbis may be perfect for a portable, since you likely won't notice the lower quality and you can fit more music on, but I sure as hell don't want to listen to them through my Sennheisers) direct from my main music player.

      Disk space once held me back from switching to lossless; but now I can get a practically silent 160G drive for around 80; I've got nearly half a TB in my desktop machine now, so why should I care?

      Not everyone thinks it's worth it, obviously; that's why we have lossy formats in the first place. Lossless is still *the* way to go, and I'm quite happy to pay extra to get it.

    21. Re:At last! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Others have mentioned magnatune. I'll mention Phish, they've been selling FLACs of their concerts for a while now.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:At last! by awol · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the suggestion, I do like "The Twin" and have some previous work, so I guess I shall have to try the "Boards of Canada" offering.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    23. Re:At last! by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      Right on. I have my entire music collection on my hard disk in FLAC format (about 60GB). Not only is it a great backup solution, it's the ultimate jukebox when you hook it up to the stereo. Having 2000 songs from 200 CD's play randomly always impresses the guests. You'll hear music you never knew you had, or forgot about a long time ago!

    24. Re:At last! by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      Unless you like IDM, I would NOT get autechre or aphex twin. You will likely love them or hate them, and if you liked that sort of music, you would know them by now.

      Instead go for BoC (as already suggested) or Nightmares on Wax. Both are more downtempo dance music than IDM. BoC is very ambient (calling it dance music is a big strech), with beats taking a back-seat to soundscape on most songs. NoW is more beat driven, and is HIGHLY listenable. NoW's Mind Elevation is one of my favorite albumns, and A Word of Science is not bad at all.

    25. Re:At last! by Eccles · · Score: 1

      If people are willing to pay a premium for the bandwidth cost they incur, then even 24bit versions of files could be sold.

      Speaking of which, do FLAC and the like currently support 24bit/96K input files? Likewise, does WAV support 24/96K, or is there some other uncompressed format for that audio resolution?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    26. Re:At last! by deliciousmonster · · Score: 1

      There's a company called BeatPort that lets you buy .wav files, as well as mp3 or mp4... The difference is that wav files are burned to cd and Fed-Ex'd to you...

      Plus, they have like 170 labels...

      --
      I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
    27. Re:At last! by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are a genius. My credit card's out and ready to match your $20. Time to "vote with my wallet" as it were. Meet ya there in five.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    28. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With only 16 bits / 44,100 Hz you lose a LOT of information. Not being able to tell the difference IS the point.

    29. Re:At last! by jafac · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm still looking for a price-point in the 25 to 50 cent per track range. (as long as the track's at least 2 minutes). 99 cents is too much. I'm still tempted to find a different and cheaper source, so 99 cents isn't competitive.

      The data should be free. Customer pays for convenience.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    30. Re:At last! by Gubbe · · Score: 1
      do FLAC and the like currently support 24bit/96K input files?
      Based on tidbits of info found by googling, Wavpack, FLAC and Monkey's Audio all support 24-bit resolution at 96 kHz sampling rate, although I'm not 100% sure of 96kHz with wavpack.

      With lossy formats, the whole 24/96 point is practically moot since they are designed to remove everything that is presumed non-audible by humans.
    31. Re:At last! by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the original master copy is stored at a significantly higher bitrate than 44kHz/16 bit CD quality--this needs to be the case for accurate mixing and editing--so you're already losing fidelity by downsampling to CD. In other words, CD quality is not lossless. An AAC file (for instance) made from the original master might actually be "truer" to the original signal than the CD, since the AAC encoder preserves the most "important" information while the CD tosses frequencies indiscriminately above 22kHz.

      Of course, you'd have to encode from the original master to get better fidelity than the CD (this is what the iTunes Music Store engineers are doing, IIRC). The point is that if you want to store your music "losslessly" with better potential fidelity than AAC/MP3/etc., it's going to take a lot more disk space than you think.

      Also, I disagree that "the only thing holding lossless back is bandwidth and disk space." Show me a hard disk that can hold ten thousand tunes encoded with FLAC (at the same fidelity as the original master), and I'll show you one that can hold ten million encoded with AAC. For the same price!

      yours

    32. Re:At last! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I second Nightmares On Wax. I can't think of anyone that doesn't like them.

      Boards of Canada are great as well, but you need to be a little more "chilled" to appreciate... ;-)

      PS, never realised BoC were on Warp; learn something new every day.

    33. Re:At last! by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      the original master copy is stored at a significantly higher bitrate than 44kHz/16 bit CD quality

      I understand what you're saying, but as far as the consumer is concerned, the consumer product is the master lossless copy. How many consumers actually have access to the producer's master recording (DAT for example), let alone the hardware required to make any use of it? For all intents and purposes, the consumer audio CD is the standard master lossless copy. For that reason, it's worth preserving -- and that's what lossless compression is all about.

    34. Re:At last! by jcsehak · · Score: 1

      This is the sort of service I've been waiting for.

      It sure is. I'm this close to blowing my next paycheck on Warp's back catalog. But the thing I just can't get over -- the reason I'm so hesitant to buy anything in download format -- what if my hard drive dies? I think I might have to wait till I get a DVD burner. That way, I can backup my music collection without too much fuss. Or maybe just another HD. I mean, what are the chances of both dying at the same time?

      if there were an option for downloading the music in a lossless format

      So you want 24-bit, 96khz? Or the original tape masters?

      Now the only question is, is there anything there that I want to listen to?

      Oh, there is. Try
      - Boards of Canada: In a beautiful place out in the country
      - Nightmares on Wax: Carboot Soul
      to get you started.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    35. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If "least objectionable" is your sole criteria, may I suggest "Music Has the Right to Children" or "A Beautiful Place Out in the Country" by Boards of Canada, or perhaps something by Plaid.

    36. Re:At last! by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand what you're saying, but as far as the consumer is concerned, the consumer product is the master lossless copy.

      That's true, but my point was that technologies like AAC can reproduce the original signal more accurately, at any given bitrate, than a so-called "lossless" encoding like FLAC. Whether that original signal is a high-bitrate master or an analog soundwave is sort of beside the point.

      Suppose you encode a ten minute song with FLAC at 44.1kHz/16 bit (downsampled from the original), and it comes out to 50 megabytes. Assuming you had the original master available to work with, you could have preserved the signal much more accurately with an AAC at 669 kbits/sec, which is what the size of that FLAC works out to.

      As you say, of course, most consumers don't have access to the original master. But that's no reason to proclaim that "lossless" encoding is the be-all and end-all of audio compression. If recording studios released music compressed from the original masters with AAC at 669 kbit/sec, the accuracy of sound reproduction would definitely beat FLAC at the same bitrate.

      yours

    37. Re:At last! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      40Mb of MP3 [vs] 350Mb of FLAC or whatever. They would need way more bandwidth, way more disk space, way more infrastructure.

      Sisk space is around a dollar per GIG, and as a fixed cost it dissappears from the equation almost immeditately. I'm not sure what "infrastructure" you are refefring to.

      The variable cost here is bandwith. A quick Google search turned up several commercial server farms charging customers 20 or 22 cents per Gig when going over the monthly allotment. That works out to less than a 7 cent price difference between a 40 meg MP3 album and a 350 meg FLAC album.

      The sort of customer looking for a 350 meg FLAC really really isn't going to complain that you set the FLAC price 10 cents higher than the MP3. For a single song the price difference is about a penny.

      Bandwith and disk space are DIRT CHEAP. Such a download service should offer each song in loads of different formats and bit rates. The main issue is that you don't want to confuse non-techies with 12 million options. Simple enough - put just the basic formats on ordinary pages and have the rest of teh formats hidden behind some sort of "advanced" tab or user prefferences.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    38. Re:At last! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      With lossy formats, the whole 24/96 point is practically moot since they are designed to remove everything that is presumed non-audible by humans.

      That is pure bigotry, you insensitve clod.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    39. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a less abrasive Autechre experience, Amber is very good. It's also my first Autechre album ;) All Boards of Canada albums are highly recommended as well!

    40. Re:At last! by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      I cant see companies offering downloads in lossless format anytime in the near future

      How about in the present or the near past? livephish has been offering lossless downloads (originially shn, then switched to flac) since it started a little over a year ago. They cost more than mp3s (also available) due the bandwith (and, possibly, the fact that people are willing to pay more for better quality), but can't be as expensive to supply as you believe because a whole show (3 cd's) is $13 (cheaper if you buy several at once), and they wouldn't run the service if it lost money (since the proceeds go to charity).
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    41. Re:At last! by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Don't forget disk space rapidly climbs in price when you start needing to add redundancy and speed, especially when you hit scalability limits of your current hardware. It's still cheap compared with what it was (duh ;), but it's still not at a point where it's "cheap enough" for me.

      When we can store all the information in the universe on a single budget drive with the reliability at least equal to that of atomic nuclei, then I'll be happy for development to slow down. *shakes fist at R&D* -- get researching the creation of artificial universes! ;)

    42. Re:At last! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      still not at a point where it's "cheap enough" for me.

      Chuckle, but it is "cheap enough" to be vanishing as a fixed business expense. The main expenses are ongoing costs like employees and a building and lawyers and paying artists and whatnot.

      Bandwith is an ongoing variable cost and negligible to the price of a download. As a fixed cost drive space doesn't even rate as "negilgible", it is vanishing.

      P.S.
      I eagerly await our new all the information in the universe on a single budget drive Overlords.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    43. Re:At last! by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      As you say, of course, most consumers don't have access to the original master. But that's no reason to proclaim that "lossless" encoding is the be-all and end-all of audio compression.

      But, for audio of any bitrate, you can't possibly do better than an exact digital copy, i.e. lossless compression. It's the end of the line -- you either have an exact digital copy, or you don't. It doesn't matter if we're talking about a high-bitrate recording master or a noisy low-bitrate mp3 -- you can't possibly do any better than an exact digital copy. Right?

      If recording studios released music compressed from the original masters with AAC at 669 kbit/sec, the accuracy of sound reproduction would definitely beat FLAC at the same bitrate.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but AAC is lossy. If they had a lossless format which preserved the original high-bitrate recording exactly, then it would have to beat AAC.

  12. KUDOS! by MoFoQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    at least these guys know NOT to bite the hand that feeds 'em.

  13. And then it went Bleep Bleep Bleep by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was a good MP3

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:And then it went Bleep Bleep Bleep by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      "... which sucks cause it was like, a really great CD.
      I use Ogg Vorbis now, and my speakers, like, make sweet sweet loveto my ears."

      Shame I can't find this online...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  14. excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    bravo to warp...

    if an indie can do this and still keep a good eye on their bottom line, maybe some of the behemoths might take a few pointers and realize that some reasonable control over distribution is far better than no control at all.

    very sensible. big up warp!

  15. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    I'm so excited, I'm going to spend a few hundred dollars on their music and upload it to every P2P service listed on zeropaid.com :)

    1. Re:Awesome! by lukior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of there music is on every P2P service. I don't see what the point is of DRM because all music and movies are always on all P2P services. The only people they hurt with DRM are the honest ones.

      --
      I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    2. Re:Awesome! by robdeadtech · · Score: 1

      hmmmm... just like your CD collection eh?

      --
      Heil Sig! -Rob
  16. Getting Closer by lukior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is closer to a model I can live with. I'm sorry after having lived through the heyday of free downloads it is going to take a new price point for me. I think a subscription model with unlimited downloads and no DRM is more in line with what i would pay for. I am one of those people who feels no guilt with copying. To support artists I'll go to there shows. Props for being DRM free though.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    1. Re:Getting Closer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "...subscription model with unlimited downloads ..."

      Yes, but is that possible? the only way I can see where that would happen is if the limited your downloads. Otherwise people would have every song after a month.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Getting Closer by lukior · · Score: 1

      I think the reason you would have to limit downloads is not because people would have every song within a month but because of bandwidth costs. I have over 25,000 tracks and i would bet i dont have a thousandth of a percent of total available music. I doubt anyone has the pipe or the storage to think about downloading all available music. Besides currently all the P2P programs do have unlimited downloads and they have been going strong for years.

      --
      I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    3. Re:Getting Closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm....do you heard it all? :-)

    4. Re:Getting Closer by radish · · Score: 1

      What if the artist in question didn't do shows? A lot of the music I listen to doesn't exist in a live context, as it wouldn't really make sense in one. How do you support them then? Personally, I buy the CDs/vinyl.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  17. Bleep by tliet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was that the last thing the server said after this article got posted on Slashdot?

    1. Re:Bleep by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      I'll resist making an Ellen Feiss "switcher" joke here...

      OK, no I won't. "And the server was like, bleep, and I was like, huh? But then I got a Mac, and never suffered the Slashdot Effect again. I'm Ellen, and I'm an Internet culture phenomenon."

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  18. Grand statements. by jhobbs · · Score: 5, Informative
    'We are at present the only store to offer very high quality MP3 files,'

    I subscribe to eMusic.com which has independent artists. The use the subscription method, but you get MP3s and most are high bit rate. I also buy electronica music at WombMusic.com, they have up and coming DJs and artists and sell MP3s by the song. The bitrates range from 192 to 320 (plenty for my ears). If you want to know if you like a DJ you can listen to the song or watch them spin live at TheWomb.com. (Or I just open my office window and listen to them from accross the street.) ;)

    1. Re:Grand statements. by Kizzle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just checked out Wombmusic and I think I'll be buying from them soon. They allso have a 3d chat room thingy that is pretty interesting.

    2. Re:Grand statements. by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      I just noticed, they have moved the live DJ video feed from thewomb to wombmusic. Its listed under video and they now apparently have streaming music videos.

    3. Re:Grand statements. by munpfazy · · Score: 1
      Yup.

      Most of emusic's material is also encoded with LAME's preset standard vbr setting. And it's also available without any attempted DRM nonsense. (And despite using a somewhat funky custom client, they support linux.)

      Then there's magnatune, featured some months back on slashdot, who offers uncompressed wavs.

      Don't get me wrong - *three* online distributors who treat their audio and their customers with respect is better than *two*. But, they've gone a bit overboard claiming to be the first to offer high quality, drm-free stuff.

    4. Re:Grand statements. by jred · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that if you subscribe to eMusic's basic plan, it works out to being $0.25/song...

      Oh, and eMusic rocks! :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    5. Re:Grand statements. by jbrw · · Score: 1

      (Or I just open my office window and listen to them from accross the street.)

      Watching the video now? Do they just setup some decks and gear in a plaza near some shops/offices? The DJ looks pretty lonely as he watches the other people wander by. Ha.

    6. Re:Grand statements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its nice, but they need more stuff.

      I was subscribed to the unlimited plan previously. I downloaded a lot of stuff, and I pretty much got all I wanted.

      They need more content to draw me back. At least to make it worth $20/month

      (that's what...like 90 songs, or 9 CD's worth?)

    7. Re:Grand statements. by jhobbs · · Score: 1

      The have a corner office on the building across the street. As a sort of free advertising they sometimes open thier windows, hang out a banner, and crank up the volume (that's actually how I discovered them).

  19. THANK YOU WARP by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Insightful


    For continuing to be groundbreaking in everything you do.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:THANK YOU WARP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna rebuy the stuff I already own (and *already* have on mp3) - WARP on the frontline again. This is so worth rewarding.

      Refs in the FAQ inc. LAME, Firebird, Ogg, possibility of the 24bit versions for sale (BMG? Sony? anyone? anyone?), oh yeah and NO DRM - I'm already a 'criminal' - but they're prepared to take me back into society...

      "But I've never heard of any of them."
      Take a $0.99 chance on this 1 track : Aphex Twin -Come To Daddy.

      + your life will never be the same again.

      Oh, you little files,
      COme TO DAdDy.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaggggghhh (tm(not mine))

  20. Re:Mp3? Bleh by 740916 · · Score: 0

    Why not use Ogg Vorbis?

    For the same reason no one uses Betamax: no uses Betamax.

    --

    740916
  21. Re:Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After you download them, plz send them to me. Thanks!

  22. RARE by Flingles · · Score: 0

    "You can download Aphex Twin's rare, groundbreaking Hangable Auto Bulb EP for $4.29. "
    Rare? not anymore...

    --
    Karma: -2^0.5 . Mainly due to the imbibing of dihydrogen monoxide
  23. Why they called it bleep by aduzik · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    One record executive turned to another and said, "How the (bleep) do you think they'll get away without putting DRM on the music? Let's dispatch the RIAA hounds at once!"

    I guess "f**k" wouldn't have been such a good name for a music download service.

    --
    If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  24. No DRM by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

    But now people will complain about the price... though perhaps it's a move to get people to buy albums instead of singles.

    1. Re:No DRM by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Because they're in Canada and are pricing to the CAN$ unit, the price from a US$-spending American's point of view is going to constantly be bouncing... just wait for the exchange rates to get better and they'll be cheaper than iTunes...

    2. Re:No DRM by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      Good point! I'll have to keep an eye on that then. :)

    3. Re:No DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not a minute too soon! Still, individual tracks are still WAY cheaper than individual singles from a record store.

  25. Re:Criminals by lukior · · Score: 1

    I think there are many on Slashdot who believe the laws that make copying illegal need to be altered. If I knew that this stuff would get into the Public Domain sometime I might feel guilty. Until they rewrite copyright to be something like 14 years like it was originally I will copy without remorse.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
  26. Great... by Powercntrl · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...artists I've never heard of want me to buy their music because they're not using DRM. Uh, that's nice.

    If you don't like any mainstream radio music and indie stuff is your cup of tea, that's fine - whatever sinks your sub. I happen to enjoy mainstream rock music and do hear new songs that I enjoy via the radio. For the amazing cost of free, you can experience new music almost anywhere, on a cheap dollar store radio, on a audiophile Hi-Fi set or in your car. Sorry, sitting in front of my computer trying to discover new music by taking time to download things I may not like is not as efficient as listening to the radio while I am already doing some other task, like driving.

    The problem is that the recording industry behaves like a bratty child with a lot of really cool toys when it comes to the tracks they play on the air... "Sure, you can play with the ball, but only when I say you can! If you listen to me beg for ice cream for hours, you can play my Nintendo, but only after we play electric race cars first!"

    I've always felt that if they play it on the air, I should be able to add it to my collection for free. Judging by current P2P usage despite the RIAA's legal attacks, a lot of people still seem to feel the same way. We want the music we HAVE heard with control to listen to it as we want, not music we haven't heard.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Great... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Sorry, sitting in front of my computer trying to discover new music by taking time to download things I may not like is not as efficient as listening to the radio while I am already doing some other task, like driving.

      You're sitting in front of your computer now, why not pop on over to http://di.fm and broaden your horizons.. no downloading, free internet radio that plays the same stuff they're selling on Bleep.

    2. Re:Great... by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Just because you've never heard of Warp doesn't mean they aren't significant. Warp has Aphex Twin, Squarepusher, and many other influential electronic bands. They are by no means a two bit operation.

    3. Re:Great... by pavon · · Score: 1

      So basically you are too lazy to look for entertainment - you want it delivered on a silver plate. And it isn't good enough that this service is free - you think that it should also have free unrestricted copy for your personal use.

      What was it that the recording industry was acting like again? ;)

    4. Re:Great... by lavaface · · Score: 1
      Sorry, sitting in front of my computer trying to discover new music by taking time to download things I may not like is not as efficient as listening to the radio while I am already doing some other task, like driving.

      Well, you coud always peruse Shoutcast to find thousands of radio stations. There's probably something there you just might like. Hell, I discovered great stuff from Fila Brazilia (to name just one group) from the ol' monkeyradio.com When I heard something I liked, I'd check out that artist on (the old) audiogalaxy.com . . .

      I discovered great new tunes from Audiogalaxy's related artist links, including stuff from Warp.

      I hope future versions of iTunes (or whatever) include a "buy it now" button when listening to radio streams. All the time I hear something cool and wish I could make a micropayment (something like 50 cents) to "bookmark" the track in my personal collection. Think of it like a digital jukebox. A number of these payments over time (consider them votes for music) could help out artists that don't have the payola to get there stuff played on the radio.In the future, I suppose this could be added to car radios. Many times I hear something great on the college radio station and wish I could press a button to "download" it for future use.

      've always felt that if they play it on the air, I should be able to add it to my collection for free.

      Ummm, you could tape it, then rip it to mp3. But that would be too much work now, wouldn't it? BUY MUSIC YOU LIKE. Then maybe artists will continue to put out quality albums. I happen to enjoy mainstream rock music and do hear new songs that I enjoy via the radio.

      I pity you.

    5. Re:Great... by Peeet · · Score: 1

      You seem to be making the mistake of stating that the labels "good" and "bad" are directly correlated to "mainstream" and "inde". Just because something is "mainstream", does not at all mean it is good or bad. Mainstream refers only to the way it is distributed. Distribution does not automatically correlate to quality. And yes, I know, you could say that logically, the more people that want something, the better it must be. This point is becoming less and less valid with the politically influenced decisions (polotics between companies and corporations, not polotics as in George Bush, government) that control the mass media. Quite often, something is chosen to go mainstream for no particular reason.

      My point is... I, personally, have a large music collection. It is an eclectic bunch of music, and I have many songs from both "mainstream" and "indie" artists. But I don't see them like that. Hell, that's why I call them songs, I don't even see them really as albums that much anymore. When I listen to music, I actually listen to it. I don't care what record label released it or who released it or how cool the lead guitar player guy is or what so and so's opinion on something is. I only care about how it makes me feel when I listen to it.

      This is how it should be and which is why I only go to concerts for the atmosphere of all the other concert goers and to watch the cool lighting and staging effects (I'm a theater lighting major at school) I don't go so that I can get a glimpse of the rockstar or so I can feel like I'm "rockin out" with the band. I don't care about them personally, just the noises they make and arrange. The history and polotics behind it has no effect whatsoever on me. I'll listen to hard rock radio, classical music, wierd ass surreal atmospheric techno-polka rap ballads, whatever.

      The point of my point, the music is what matters, not where it comes from and who made it or why. And the recording people should not be the bigger piece of the pie than the creating people, but that's how it is, and it should be changing. There is a lot of indie artists out there that is better quality than its mainstream counterparts, and a lot of mainstream that is better than the indie. Listen to the radio, if you hear something that catches your ear, go find it. Download and listen to random music, if you hear something that catches your ear, keep it. Just please don't change your mind after deciding you like it because of who distributes/releases it.

      Oh and I do agree with you that if we hear it on the radio, we should be able to add it to our collection, seems kind of dumb not to be that way already. But downloading random music and listening to it is my version of listening to the radio to find new stuff.

      -P

    6. Re:Great... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      You seem to be making the mistake of stating that the labels "good" and "bad" are directly correlated to "mainstream" and "inde". Just because something is "mainstream", does not at all mean it is good or bad.

      Actually, I agree... My point, which I probably didn't make clear enough, was that the radio makes discovering new music (which I may or may not like) completely effortless compared to online services. Yes, I have found some indie music online that I liked, but I had to (unfortunately) listen to a lot of really bad music to find it.

      Distribution does not automatically correlate to quality.

      Well, it does equate to production quality. A lot of the freebies on MP3.com back in its hayday were just people recording with a RadioShack microphone into their computer. The RIAA stuff that gets airplay pretty much always produced professionally. I'm really not trying to tar all indie artists with the same brush - I realize there are MANY who produce their music professionally. The problem is, generally sites that host indie music don't say no to the artists that suck. A peer review/voting system could do a lot to improve this, but I found MP3.com's (when it existed) to be biased towards the freebies offered by RIAA-signed artists.

      Just please don't change your mind after deciding you like it because of who distributes/releases it.

      I would never decide I hated something after-the-fact... It's just that, as I said, there's a lot of effort required to find indie music that is similar in production quality and style to what is played on the radio. There's a whole lot of despising the mainstream that goes on in indie circles. Of course, Slashdot's hypocrisy shows with my original post now hovering at score: 0 for saying I actually enjoy mainstream music. "Mainstream bad!, mainstream Baaah... wooo let's go see Lord of the Rings!!!"

      But downloading random music and listening to it is my version of listening to the radio to find new stuff.

      If you've got the time and bandwidth to do that, that's great. I'd prefer something automated - "Tivo like" if you could call it that. Maybe something that downloads songs it thinks I will like based upon past prefences and uploads them to my iPod overnight while it's docked to charge. Since the iPod has a built-in rating system, maybe such an app could use the rating like a thumbs up/thumbs down on the Tivo. THAT would make discovering new music online as easy as the radio.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    7. Re:Great... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Well, you coud always peruse Shoutcast to find thousands of radio stations. There's probably
      something there you just might like.


      Yea, there are Shoutcast stations that play mainstream format... Pity Shoutcast won't work in my car, or while I'm on the job, or mowing the lawn, etc...

      Ummm, you could tape it, then rip it to mp3. But that would be too much work now, wouldn't it? BUY MUSIC YOU LIKE. Then maybe artists will continue to put out quality albums.

      LOL, that's the same like the warez d00ds use in their .NFO's. The fact is, the majority of the music I like tends to be singles that are on albums full of filler. Yea, iTunes music store is nice - but it serves little use. If I really enjoy the album enough to buy it, I want the silver disc with the lossless audio, not a set of 128kbit AAC files.

      Now if it's just a single promo track I want to listen to a few more times before I get sick of it and add it to my collection, it's not really worth even $.99 to me, and is certainly not worth the effort to sit around a radio and try to tape it (or rip via totalrecorder from an Internet stream). It's really not so bad to fire up Kazaa, run a few searches, start a big ass queue, sort out the shit later.

      I pity you.

      A song is entertainment, it is not a video card that can be benchmarked and compared to competitors based on its performence at its intended use. If I hear something I like and I enjoy it, that's all that matters to me. Hey, I lucked out, the radio plays music I enjoy... If I had pity for anyone, it would be someone who has to use bandwidth, storage space and time to download music he's not even sure if he'll enjoy.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    8. Re:Great... by Peeet · · Score: 1

      I have found some indie music online that I liked, but I had to (unfortunately) listen to a lot of really bad music to find it.

      I'll have to second that, I have found a lot of crap out there. To answer this and your other statement about "something that downloads songs it thinks I will like based upon past prefences", there was some sort of decentralized legal content delivery system that worked downstream. aka, people could choose channels that they trust and that channel was run by a person, deciding, supposedly based on their personal likes and dislikes, what would get sent downstream of the channel. I think you could also have it just randomly browse channels and download stuff whenever it was broadcast. It was all sorts of files, music especially, and basically, you would set it up to run in the background and it would collect some stuff overnight. Then the next day, or after however long, you could sort through and listen to all sorts of random crap.

      Now if I remember correctly, it sucked, didn't really go anywhere and everything I ever got from it was craptastic...
      but...
      My point is that, someone could create, say, some sort of open source program that takes advantage of this, transfers stuf to the ipod etcetera etcetera. Of one ould get a internet radio stream ripper and go to town. Although, if you have dialup, which I suspect you do, you would be better off with a decentralized p2p distribution or downstream channel distribution arcitechture (sp?)

      The moral of the story? Get broadband? I dunno, I'm really just rambling.

      -P

  27. Maybe a problem for some... by photonagon · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...but I have been waiting to purchase music from Warp records online for quite a long time. With iTunes and other music services offering mainstream music, albeit DRM crippled, there are so many smaller independant labels that are not represented online.

    So, not only is this a step in the right direction for anti-DRM music downloads, its a step in the right directions for getting smaller, lesser known labels distributing music online. I most certainly will be purchasing (its been awhile..hehe) music from this service.

  28. Folks, please support these guys! by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Simple as that. They're trying to do everything we've wanted to see in online music. Support them, and show that it CAN work.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe they should try a little harder and offer files in a lossless compression format, for a higher price to cover bandwidth and storage costs. That would truly please everyone, and should quiet the last of the bitchers and complainers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if we don't like their music. Most geeks round hear don't seem to care whether the music's good or not, just if it doesn't have drm.

    3. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by 4ntifa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Second that! Actually, I'm downloading Aphex Twin's "Selected Ambient Works II" as I type this.

      --
      -=- 4ntifa -=-
    4. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by Chaset · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I'm just feeling cynical, but why do I get the feeling that these tracks will appear on kazaa, et. al. in no time flat, and the generation raised on Napster will simply take that, rather than supporting these types of enterprises. It's just human nature to take the "easy route".

      In fact, that's pretty much how the whole thing got started, no? Since it was so easy to rip a CD and put it on Napster. With this thing, one doesn't even have to rip it first.

      I often imagine what the world would have been like if millions of people didn't blatantly abuse their fair use rights in the days of Napster. People here complain about being treated like criminals, but the whole Napster episode demonstrated with ample evidence to the record companies that yes, indeed, many people, if not the majority, would pirate music if given the chance. If these people had shown a little restraint, the record companies would never have noticed, and the rest of us law-abiding citizens wouldn't have been encumbered with annoying DRM schemes. I guess that's the idealist in me talking.

      So, even though they might be evil for lashing out like cornered animals and suing teenage girls and old ladies, I still feel that the abusers share equal blame in this whole mess.

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    5. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm downloading Aphex Twin's "Selected Ambient Works II" as I type this.

      I'm sure you are, but you're meant to be using Bleep, not Kazaa...

    6. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      I agree! I therefore announce that I will be making available for sale recordings of me singing in the shower and of my young son crying. These will be released without any DRM so please, support me and show that this can work! A dollar for me is a vote against The Man!

    7. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and then they should come around to your house and play it for you live, whenever you want.

      That would truly please everyone, and should quiet the last of the bitchers and complainers.

      People like you, you mean?

    8. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naah. That'd mean supporting dune and distance too.

    9. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by mu-sly · · Score: 1

      Aah, but to a large extent, you've swallowed what the major labels wanted you to swallow.

      We have no way of knowing how many MP3 downloads resulted in the purchase of CDs, so let me just talk about one quantifiable measure: my own experience.

      Thanks to downloading one Boards Of Canada track from Kazaa out of curiosity a couple of years ago, I took a gamble and bought one of their albums. Since then, I have purchased almost everything they've ever released, including re-issues of their back catalogue. The stuff that I haven't managed to buy (because it's not available) I've got downloaded, and am more than willing to pay for now that it is "available" again so to speak. Furthermore, my purchasing frenzy extended to other artists on Warp Records, and also to other artists in similar genres on other labels.

      You see, there may have been a billion Boards of Canada MP3s downloaded, but if only 1% of those downloads result in a purchase (or several, in my case) then it's money that the artist and record label would not have seen otherwise - free download or not.

      P2P and Internet Radio are the goose that laid the golden egg for independent artists and records labels - they are the radio station for stuff that doesn't get played on the radio, and allow Joe Public to chop and change musical tastes, and experiment with stuff they would never even have heard of before.

      Independent labels who don't subscribe to the payola system operated by the RIAA have benefitted hugely from the ability to get their music out there to the masses - whether for free or otherwise, if the music is good, fans will spring up for it, and will most likely spend money on it at some point or other.

      The major labels are scared about losing control - because for once, people can actually discover new (independent) music for themselves, and have a much greater freedom to escape from the prescribed "hits" played by the likes of MTV and Clearchannel affiliated radio stations.

      Is it easier to pay a very very reasonable price for some unrestricted MP3s that you can download immediately, or to hunt around on a shady P2P network looking for files in order to get them for free? I would say yes, much much easier. If it takes me two days to track down all the tracks from an album that I could just buy for $8 or whatever, then I'd be a fool to waste my time trying to get it for "free". My time is most certainly NOT free to me!

      There will always be "kids" who will download free music because they can't afford to pay for it - but in that case, they wouldn't have paid for it in the first place anyway. Kids grow up, get jobs, and remember the music that they like - and then they buy it. The trouble with modern pop music is that artists are ten-a-penny and are never around for more than a year or two - long term appeal is not a concern in pop music.

      Independent labels work better because they take the trouble to release top quality music with longevity. Boards of Canada's music will still be great in 10 years time, when Britney Spears and whoever else will have long been forgotten about.

      Pop music relies on cheap fads to sell huge quantities for a short period of time. It needs market control and censorship of all alternative sources of music to maintain it's iron grip on the music that we can and can't hear. The reason for it's declining sales compared to increasing sales for independent labels is simply because of it's limited short term appeal. So yes, MP3s possibly do spell the death of such prescribed fake institutions as "The Top 10" and so on, but to the benefit of far far more interesting things.

      A crappy, overpriced pop single that is only designed to be listened to and enjoyed for a month or two has no chance against a top quality album at an affordable price, that will still take your breath away in 10 years time.

      The reason the major labels are losing money, is because their payola racket and attrocious designer-hit "music" simply cannot compete in the lo

    10. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I act and think in a very similar manner to you. I've downloaded a bit of stuff, and as a result have bought albums. (or in some cases, decided not to buy them--just as fair)

      The problem is that each generation (or maybe micro-generation?) of listeners is less and less inclined to buy music. Over Christmas, I was talking to my 17 year old niece who was pushing the claim that "buying music is a waste of money! Why would I do something like that?" This is particularly ironic, because my brother (her step-dad) is a full time professional musician.

      This is where I worry about downloading. Eventually, and it may be another three years or more, there will be a very strong mindset that music shouldn't be paid for at all, in any form. That will hurt musicians--ALL musicians, but especially the small indies.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    11. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I thought most people would be bright enough to understand that they don't need to get music they don't like. Apparently not though.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    12. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by mu-sly · · Score: 1

      "buying music is a waste of money! Why would I do something like that?"

      OK, let's put that in context. I have to say that I actually agree with her almost completely. Take into consideration that compared to DVDs and computer games, CDs offer far less bang for the buck. DVDs and games continue to fall in price, tending towards the realm of CD prices, while CDs continute to increase in price, now often costing twice as much as they did five to ten years ago.

      So, in context, buying music is a waste of money, but only in the current music marketplace. Once the major labels have had their grip considerable weakened, music prices will fall to the level they should be at (hopefully with artists also taking a bigger cut from the sale of each album) and it will no longer be a waste of money compared to other forms of entertainment.

      As a semi-professional musician myself - currently independent and glad of it - I have no worries whatsoever that music will once again return to being a saleable commodity, and I will be able to make money from my music when I need to. All it needs is for the market place to return to a realistic shape. The sooner the major labels lose their grip, the sooner this will happen.

    13. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I'm just feeling cynical, but why do I get the feeling that these tracks will appear on kazaa, et. al. in no time flat, and the generation raised on Napster will simply take that, rather than supporting these types of enterprises. It's just human nature to take the "easy route".

      But the are already there anyway. Creating new mp3s and selling them on a website isn't in any way going to affect the availability of the tracks on p2p. I got two Boards of Canada CDs from WinMX six months ago, and I got some Aphex Twin ones over two years ago on Napster (looking at the file date stamps).

      This was before this service was available, and it didn't get in my way... The question is, can they tempt people like me, who have had "free" music for several years, back into buying music again? I don't think they will be able to...

      I just try to do my bit to promote the artists to friends (especially the more obscure stuff I have), and go to live music whenever possible.

    14. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Maybe they should try a little harder and offer files in a lossless compression format, for a higher price to cover bandwidth and storage costs. That would truly please everyone, and should quiet the last of the bitchers and complainers.

      Of course, it never ends there. Next is going past the CD-quality barrier, and doing 24/96 support, etc.

      Of course mangatune already supports FLAC, WAV, etc.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    15. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Things must be different here in Canada.

      CDs came out at $20 some two decades ago, and have stayed around that price ever since. That is until November, when the major distributors took $6 off of their prices!

      So now CDs are $14 CDN list, and often a few bucks off of that on sale. In contrast, I remember paying $12-$14 for records back in 1982.

      Secondly, arguing over price misses the point--it's exactly like arguing how large a binary "on" signal is. My niece isn't saying that she doesn't want to buy music because it's too expensive or inappropriately priced--she's saying that as long as she can get stuff for free (legally or not), then she can't see any reason to pay for it at ALL. That's a scary precedent.

      "The sooner the major labels lose their grip, the sooner this will happen."

      I can't argue that one bit. The problem is that as long as we're not actively helping the musicians, we're helping the RIAA.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    16. Re:Folks, please support these guys! by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Just have done. Fired them off a mail thanking them, signed up, bought three albums I downloaded off P2P whilst I was a student and haven't get bought on CD.

      Fired them off another mail praising the technical excellence of their site (works fine in Opera and Firebird 0.7 on both Windows and Linux) and adding another "please suppply Ogg as an option!" to the pile.

      Warp have been my favourite record label ever since I heard Didgeridoo by Aphex Twin in 1995. They've continued to be the paragon of innovative electronic music throughout the years, and now this.

      Warp, you are the best label on the planet, period. You are good to your acts, you are good to your customers.

      I salute you.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  29. Hope more labels will follow that move... by KFK+-+Wildcat · · Score: 1

    Finally a label seems to have done everything right.
    High enough quality (avg. 205 kbps VBR) so that I can't differentiate from the CD, no DRM crap, reasonnable pricing, and they seem to pay the artists adequately :
    "Finally, buying music through Bleep means that you are supporting the artists work, and in some cases you are getting mp3's encoded by the artists themselves. After the bandwidth charges and Bleep running costs are subtracted, the artist gets half of the album or track price."

    Now if only I had ever heard of one of those bands...

  30. Has the department of homeland secuirty . . . by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1, Funny

    been notified about this un-american attitude of innocent before proven guilty? We believe that most people like to be treated as customers and not potential criminals.

    1. Re:Has the department of homeland secuirty . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the uninformed

  31. OS. by Daleks · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the logo at the bottom? Looks like they're running some sort of OS/2 Warp. Cool!

    1. Re:OS. by MrDigital · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anyone notice the logo at the bottom? Looks like they're running some sort of OS/2 Warp. Cool!

      OS/2 Warp has been around forever (or like 8 years) and IBM still supports it. They even came out with OS/2 Warp Server for eBusiness not too long ago.

      It's too bad OS/2 didn't get more play in it's day. If an 8 year old OS can still hang tight in today's market of 'new OS every 18 months,' it must be an extremely well-designed OS in the first place.

      --
      In a digital world there can be only one..
      The one, the only, MrDigital.
  32. Criminality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole system of ownership of the land is piracy. We are destroying nature and it is sick. For me, a socialist government with a strong sense of ethnic pride is the only solution.

    1. Re:Criminality by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      For me, a socialist government with a strong sense of ethnic pride is the only solution. It's called "Nazi Germany". Look into it.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Criminality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like saying, "There is an answer to your question, and it is: follow Satan."

      Hmm.

    3. Re:Criminality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      socialist government : Nazi (National Socialist).

      strong sense of ethnic pride : White Power/Aryans/kill the jews/homos/etc

      How many socialist governments with a "strong sense of ethnic pride" that didn't involve mass executions and such?

  33. Holy BLEEP! by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1

    Holy bleep that's cool I'm going to check them out right now!

  34. Re:Criminals by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Agree with everything except token. This beats out my alternative, mailing Aphex and Squarepusher $20.
    Now for to find an address for Muziq.

  35. Massive catalog by sacrilicious · · Score: 5, Funny
    Warp Records... featuring artists such as Aphex Twin, Autechre, and Boards of Canada...

    Wow, their bands run the gamut from A to... well, B.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:Massive catalog by wohoo_gnu_is_great · · Score: 1

      You obviously missed both the the scroll buttons and the shortcuts A-Z, 0-9, MISC, ALL.

    2. Re:Massive catalog by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      plaid and squarepusher are also on this label. i hope they'll put some rephlex stuff on there soon.

    3. Re:Massive catalog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We represent the estate of Dorothy Parker and ask that you cease and desist from using Ms. Parker's jokes without permission or royalty payments.

  36. splat by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

    23 minutes after the /. post and the site is toast. I'll try again tomorrow though, sounds like it might be good.

    --
    "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  37. Warp Records are class act folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really gotta hand it to the folks at Warp for knowing better... the material on their label is not pop. No, you're not going to know every act on their label, and that's the point. They release the best and most diverse electronic type music of any label.

    Some of their acts may be more well known, like Aphex Twin and The Black Dog (The latter also makes up Plaid with two members out of Black Dog) ... but Warp is one of those rare labels you can probably randomly buy something out of their catalogue and appreciate it... of course, if you like that kind of music.

    Wildly experimental... electronic, blips, bleeps, some dance, some not, highly remixable, highly unsual, not your typical pop formulaic stuff that is structured perfectly into a verse, chorus, verse, chorus, break, chorus to fade type list of things to include in a song. Dare I say... a lot of stuff probably would be considered the electronic equivilent of jazz music.

    Highly recommended for those who actually don't mind listening to the atypical electronic stuff.

    But hey... I'm excited now, Warp has shown that they're aware of who their buyers are and will treat them like they should be treated: Customers, not criminals. KUDOS!

  38. Who the hell is "we"? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are people who are acting badly and there are those who aren't.
    Many of the RIAA/MPAA actions hurt both groups indiscriminently.

    I'm not pirating or reselling their music but their aggravating "copy control" measures means I can't use CDs I buy with my Network Walkman.

    I'm not pirating or reselling their movies but their irritating red dots spoil (to some extent) my enjoyment of their movies.

    It is unnacceptable for them to be damaging legitimate users in this way. Not to mention the insanity of devalueing their own product in the process. I am not a criminal and won't be treated like one. I therefore do not buy any such product except in rare situations (eg LotR, I'm seeing Radiohead in concert later in the year so actually listening to the CD first is a pretty good idea). I used to buy about 4-6 CDs a month. Since this "copy controlled" stuff started showing up in Australia I have bought precicely three and only the Radiohead one has DRM.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  39. lets slashdot them! by deathcloset · · Score: 1

    it would be the first slashdotting directly resulting in profit...EVER.

    1. Re:lets slashdot them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you missed Return of the Domain name yesturday.

  40. Same quality as vinyl... by centralizati0n · · Score: 1

    Plus, you're getting the same quality as vinyl, since most Electronica/Techno is worked on as 44khz... if they offer really high quality encodes, the quality difference will be negligible... What I really want to see is a label that does classical or something record at >100 khz and distribute the music as 524 kbit [insert uber-format here] files.

    1. Re:Same quality as vinyl... by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      Same quality as vinyl, but VBR means I can't record mix sets in Traktor. ----- Life is a video game and I've got the high score Spyrochaete

    2. Re:Same quality as vinyl... by attaka · · Score: 1

      Why would you ever want >100khz?
      I don't know for sure, but it sounds lika a waste to me!

    3. Re:Same quality as vinyl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the tracks are pre-analysed to run in Traktor if you would care to read the news.

    4. Re:Same quality as vinyl... by ae5 · · Score: 1

      i guarentee you if you put on an mp3 and vinyl copy of the same tune from warp you will notice a big difference.

      yes the tunes are usually from samplers and some digital virtual analog synths which are digits however a lot of it is also from actual analog synths that were never digits, and i know people like squarepusher (on his older machine at least) was using an analog board and an 8 track reel to reel tape machine to actually record the stuff, thus the nice analog warmth and fatness (which does not exist in purely digital form going straight to mp3 from a hard drive) is intakt.

      mp3's are about as far from vinyl sound quality as you can possibly get. and i say this as the enthusiastic owner of a large vinyl collection and a 40 gig ipod. mp3's/aac's are great because of space and downloadability, that's it.

  41. Re:Criminals by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    How many people do you know who resell the things they download?

    Copy protection and copyright has shown itself to be as worthless as much of the music and movies being peddled today. Why bother? The RIAA takes what it wants. Your rights to fair use, artists' rights to control their works, and money that should go to artists, songwriters, and musicians - not to mention your time and money when you are inaccurately targeted and portrayed as a thief or run up against one of their lobbied laws or 'taxes'.

    I can't feel too bad about their plight, as my record and songs are currently being sold and relicenced without MY consent. Where is my protection?

    The system is broken, and it is only going to get worse for regular music fans and the artists that make music for them and themselves.

    So meh on your devil's advocate post.

  42. Did you know? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1
    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Did you know? by MrDigital · · Score: 1
      When you compliment OS/2, you're complimenting Microsoft!

      I love Windows 2000 and Windows 2003.

      Not everyone that comes to Slashdot has trouble complimenting Microsoft.

      --
      In a digital world there can be only one..
      The one, the only, MrDigital.
  43. Electronic Music by loconet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At first glance, I guess the reason Wrap Records (and most electronic music (EM) companies/artists I imagine) and artists do not complain too much about music piracy and some what embraces it, lays on the nature of the music itself. I believe most EM artists earn their salary through live shows at clubs, festivals, radio appearances, etc, rather than cd sales. By allowing the public to get to know the artist's music, if the fans like it, the more popular this artist gets, the more people at EM events, the more money for the artists. Because EM is not as big as most other genres, in most cases there is not enough budget to manufacture an image for these artists, so talent and popularity, based on the quality of the music itself is what determines the artist's success. Unlike most mainstream music, electronic music focuses on the music itself rather than the artist's image.

    Then again, it might just be because most EM comes from Europe (specially Holland, Germany) which well is very open about the whole music piracy issue :D

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Electronic Music by lavaface · · Score: 1
      most EM comes from Europe (specially Holland, Germany)

      I think you misspelled "UK" ; )

    2. Re:Electronic Music by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      That is because you have to be hooped up on E and/or other drugs to enjoy this type of music. People in the office/at home might notice.

      *joke*

    3. Re:Electronic Music by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      I think you're right about that the lack of complaints about piracy comes from the nature of the music, but I don't think it's so much of an economic issue as an artistic. Of course the musicians want to make money, but some of them also like to use samples, and they often remix other people's music. I know of a couple of "illegal" albums where almost all the samples are a little too obvious and noone bothered asking the "original" artists (with their slightly less original music) for permission to use their stuff. I've even made such "illegal" music myself (unreleased). The respect for copyright just isn't as strong in a culture where every sound can be taken and used in a new way.

      Of course this doesn't mean techno musicians think piracy is a good thing, it is after all a form of "theft" that lacks the style of a good sample. The reason why WARP doesn't care for DRM may be because people who are into their music buy far more records than those who only listen to mainstream garbage. And they want DJs to be able to use their music, which might be impossible if it's encumbered with a MS only DRM-format. After all, WARP doesn't know which tools the DJ prefers (I've seen one using two iPods and a mixer).

      I'll end my comment with a WARP recommendation. One of the best albums of 2003 was Prefuse 73's One Word Extinguisher. It's 23 tracks, and many of them are fillers that don't make much sense without the surrounding tracks, so you should listen to the whole album. I know you'll like it.

    4. Re:Electronic Music by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      ha you ARE right about the filler. (Think De La Soul, but less annoying)

      If De La Soul were RnB rap, then prefuse 73 is IDM rap. Not bad at all, and likely to have appeal outside the IDM community, but if you hate blips and plops, not for you.

      Good Recommendation. I've made mine above (Nightmares on Wax).

    5. Re:Electronic Music by carn1fex · · Score: 1

      I used to believe this too until I brought the topic up with a few EM producers I know from different genres. They think mp3s are purely satanic and hate them and people who download them rabidly. If you go read any magazines that interview EM producers you will find this to be the opinion by and large. VERY FEW artists can scratch a living from live shows (real money requires being on tour which means you dont have a real job and think about how much you get per gig per week.. not much). An incredibly sad number of electronic music labels have folded in the last 2 years alone with no end in site. They are quick to blame mp3s as a major cause of this (which I disagree with as a the principal cause and I could rant pages about this). A friend of mine who runs a drum & bass label almost disowned me as a friend after he found out I was one of those mp3 bastards. So go buy some mp3s! Support your scene.

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

    6. Re:Electronic Music by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I know of a couple of "illegal" albums where almost all the samples are a little too obvious and noone bothered asking the "original" artists (with their slightly less original music) for permission to use their stuff. I've even made such "illegal" music myself (unreleased)

      Seesh, "a couple"? I've got over four gig of this kind of material. "You see boy, the real money is in bootlegging" - simpsons quote, also used at the start of one of these albums.

      This stuff is the next big thing. Completely unauthorised, zero respect for samples. And zero commercial value. The kids love it!!

    7. Re:Electronic Music by loconet · · Score: 1

      I think you are right, it wouldn't make sense for producers to like the free mp3 deal. The ones that are ok about it I guess are dj/producers/mixers.

      --
      [alk]
  44. If only the site was nice... by iabervon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually know at least one song they're selling (since it's on the Pi soundtrack), and would actually be interested in buying the album it's from (to start with), and I've bought high quality mp3s without DRM online (from Magnatune.com) previously. However, the site immediately required resizing my browser and clicking randomly to do anything. And the thing to play a song is flash. I suspect the site is also somewhat slashdotted at this point.

    I'm their target market, so far as I can tell, but their site design is too much of a pain to deal with.

    1. Re:If only the site was nice... by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Agreed. Why is it that people just can't seem to understand that there is a *reason* why all the successful websites are no-bullshit sites ?

      By that I mean, for a start:

      • No. Flash-intros I have to click "skip" to even see the site are not cute, nor do they "brand" you as anything but an annoyance.
      • It's perfectly acceptable to have text be text. You don't actually have to make all your text-links in the form of small gifs with text on them.
      • We don't actually *need* a "unique" navigation-system on every site. A menu across the top, or along the left border will do fine thank you.
      • Not everyone has the same font-size configured. If your design looks fucked in anything but the size you use (i.e. elements come out ontop of eachother) your design sucks.
      Look at the Really successful sites. It's no accident that they all follow all of these rules, more or less. You can fully utilize Yahoo, Ebay, Slashdot and Etrade without being forced to deal with any of this crap.
    2. Re:If only the site was nice... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2, Informative

      The sites you mention as following your rules are also very utilitarian. Some are downright ugly (Ebay and Slashdot). Never, ever ever ever use Slashdot as a model of good design - haphazard navigation and the fonts do not work correctly after resized in my browser, which I have to do quite often. The no-bullshit sites are not successful based on the seeming simplicity of their design, but a combination of this simplicity and a large amount of "content".

      While it's not the best design in the world, the Bleep site is usable and fits in with Warp's long-time electro/techno/industrial music styles.

    3. Re:If only the site was nice... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      I never said Slashdot has good design. I said it doesn't force you to put up with a lot of crap to get at the actual content.

      You're rigth offcourse, a usable site alone won't bring you much, unless there is also some actual content of interest on the site.

      Luckily, it's rarely so that you have to choose -- the more usable sites tend to be the ones with most contant too. When a site resorts to flash-crap and "cutesy" animated menues, in almost all cases that also indicates they don't actually have anything to say, so they decided to make it "pretty but non-useful" instead of only "non-useful".

    4. Re:If only the site was nice... by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In theory, a Flash-based site could be more accessible than HTML. The lack of non-standard-conforming implementations, and vector graphics base, are actually very nice.

      The problem is that nobody seems to be able to use Flash without (a) plonking it in a non-resizable 640x480 box that gets lost somewhere in the vast expanses of any modern monitor (thus losing the WHOLE POINT of vector graphics), and (b) getting so excited about the Cool Stuff they can do with Flash that they forget about making the site consistent and usable.

      Roll on SVG... maybe we'll finally have decent sites that work at decent sizes then.

    5. Re:If only the site was nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site messes up the popular Konqueror browser (3.15) and doesn't even seem to work properly in the strictly-standards-compliant Mozilla Firebird browser (0.7). No joy with Lynx or Links either. Yet to try using telnet foo:80.

      A site like that would be acceptable on a corporate intranet where you have some clue what hardware is being used to access it; or for a site devoted to a piece of hardware which requires a particular combination of hardware and software to run it {e.g. a customer support site for a piece of kit that only works on Macs}.

    6. Re:If only the site was nice... by Eivind · · Score: 2, Funny
      How exactly could a flash-site be more accessible than html ?

      • How well do flash-sites work for blind people with screen-readers ?
      • How does it work to bookmark a spesific part of a flash-site ? (say a product from a product-catalog)
      • How accessible is a flash-site if you are using a text-only browser ?
      • How do I choose the font and fontsize I like on a flash-site ?
      • How do I change part of a flash-animation without forcing the repeating user to download the entire flash-animation over ?
      • How well do flash-sites work for printout and offline reading ?

      That's just for a start. Sorry, but "can do moving vector-graphics and sounds" just aren't by a ligthyear enough to make up for those fairly serious problems.

      In Practice, offcourse, as you hint when you say "in theory", flash-sites are much *worse* that is - they have a lot of *additional* problems that they could, in principle, assuming the people who choose to make their web-site in flash where sane, avoid. Problems such as the entire site being stuck in a fixed 400x300 box, and containing no useful info whatsoever after you get over the flashing-jumping-singind-dancing vector-graphics.

    7. Re:If only the site was nice... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      yes!

      unfortunately, 9 out of 10 people like blinky things. Or at least act as if they do. The number may actually be 8 or 7, but the swing vote isn't convicteded enough to actively avoid blinky.

      Have you ever bought a stereo? NAD are like the only company that does not charge you more for a face-plate that doesn't animate. Car stereos are even worse.

      I had a good friend recently revamp his one-man-company's website: he could not understand why I counseled (ranted, actually) against flash. He wanted a "user experience", with animations and voice-overs and ad-hoc animation. I wanted easy access to services, hyper-linkable navigation, and most of all, control over the "experience".

      When I told him I disable Java and have no speakers plugged into my computer, he couldn't fathom how I could surf the web; he LIKES websites with sound and animations.

      Bascially, it comes down to this: marketers think users primarily want pretty (and I'm willing to accept that many do), but a large group of us want control. We are the ones with bookmarklets for searching amazon and ebay, and if we had more time on our hands would likely use SOAP and bypass their UI entirely.

      In a perfect world, websites would offer both. Since websites are thinner and thinner shells around middle-tier services, offering a less adorned access to those services shouldn't be too hard.

    8. Re:If only the site was nice... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      Here's a design:

      Lay out your website in xml/html/xml: dynamically generated, fully featured.

      Now, it is easy to offer front-ends to this.

      1) plain
      2) laid out using CCS
      3) re-written in the browser using javascript (this is a really neat hack)
      4) flash, using meta-data to add "user experience"

      Since the flash will need this info from the middle tier servers anyway, you might as well export it in a format which can be used directly, or adorned with more information.

      And no, I have never seen a website that does this.

    9. Re:If only the site was nice... by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the site is as bad as the rest of the Warp site - terrible to use. The worst thing is using their poxy arrows to scroll through the tiny frames - no scrollbars at all, and the arrows move the (potentially lengthy) list at a crawl. At least they don't appear to use the dreaded accelleration effect, where the list starts moving at warp speed (no pun intended) just as it reaches your destination...

      So they need a lot of positive feedback on the content and delivery, and a lot of requests for a better navigation system. Chiefly, give me a scrollbar! They're part of the toolkit for a reason, and replacing them with your own inferior solution is annoying and, I guess, arrogant.

      It'll be Designers Republic, won't it? They can undeniably design, but they're not that concerned with usability. The site does look professional, but after using it for a while I was itching for a more convenient, friendlier interface. YMMV, naturally, you might think the site is the best thing since sliced bread. I think the SERVICE might be the best thing since sliced bread, definitely... I've now bought over half a gig of tracks. I'm going to recommend this up the yin-yang; and maybe if more people come to the site, Warp will feel a need to reassess the design.

    10. Re:If only the site was nice... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      It works perfectly fine in Firebird 0.7. That's all that I use. Slashdot on the other hand....

    11. Re:If only the site was nice... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Companies nearly universally *believe* that people want blinking-ligths and stupidity.

      But I'm pretty sure they're wrong. Sure, some people want it, some of the time. But there are a lot of us who don't.

      How do you explain the stratospheric success of Google over other search-engines which almost universally provide a lot more blinking-ligths ? Turns out when you actually want to get things done, that's only distracting.

      Same for all professional products. My Keyboard doesn't have blinking ligths. Then again it's not marketed to early teens either.

      A lot of people loose a lot of bussiness because people just get plain annoyed with all the crap they have to go through to be "allowed" to actually be a customer and purchase stuff. I feel pretty sure I'm not the only one who's closed down web-shop windows in disgust upon discovering that they insist on yet-another stupid plugin to allow me to buy their products.

    12. Re:If only the site was nice... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      and maybe if more people come to the site, Warp will feel a need to reassess the design.
      That is not how business works. They will see that their site is successful, and that must mean (in their minds) that people like it. If something is NOT doing well, that is what gets them thinking that they need to change something.

      What I think a lot of sites should have is a small feedback section, where you can rate like 1 to 5 on some aspects--content, appearance, usability, etc. That would give them easily tabulatable information about what people like and don't like about the site. That way they would have to just guess how to improve it. I think large websites don't want that kind of thing cluttering up their page, but they do research in focus groups instead because they can afford to.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    13. Re:If only the site was nice... by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      Sorry, yes - what I meant to say was that if enough people come to their site *and* mention that it's not very usable - it seems to me that the site has intrinsic usability problems, so as more people come to it, more will hopefully comment on this. Sadly, I couldn't seem to find a comment link on the site itself, merely a contact email for order problems. I guess the regular Warp site email would suffice, but even that could be hard to find for people what with all the Flash navigation and 'mystery clicking' required.

      You're quite right, they need a feedback option. Maybe they've had a lot of crazy user input in the past and they now discourage it, who knows...

    14. Re:If only the site was nice... by djneko · · Score: 1

      Design for your market segment.

      Actually, I think you're making a smidge of a mistake with design == usability. But that's only looking at it from the point of designer anything, where look is king. Personally, I hate the design of Slashdot and Yahoo, but that's a personal preference thing. But seriously, if everything looked the same, what would the point be? Everyone might as well use Frontpage templates and be done with it.

      The web was intended as a means to convey and search for information. But as everyone likes to point out, hackers are famous for mis-using things in new and interesting ways. Whether they are hacking graphics or code or ancient hackers re-purposing giant slabs of stone to form buildings.

      I bet there were some heated discussions back in those days: "Why Ogg got to fuck up perfectly fine natural rock?" "Ogg make new cave! Vor can stay in the hills if Vor likes, but animals leave!" (bad example, but, whatever)

      Er, um, anyway. As I was saying, design for your market. If your market is ultra-hip post-cyberpunk *insert god damn stupid adjective here* that appreciates some weird, fucked up hyper-techno *insert descriptive here* interface, then giving them something that looks like Yahoo is gonna make 'em go to sleep. Conversely, if you're peddling information to people with remarkable lack of imagination (think stock market investors or the people so afraid of the Inter-Net that they type URLs into Yahoo's search box because it's all they know) you want your interface to be as simple and straightforward as possible.

      Design for your market. Some people care about usablity over looks, some people are the other way around. And yes, I realize that a lot of people that are into the old-skool techno are also anal retentive and don't want anything to be different from their comfortable routines, but that's why there is choice.

      Neko (apologies for being supercillous and rude)

      --
      `/\/\
      (^.^)
      (")(")
      not quite an analog pussy, just a cat that plays with vinyl
    15. Re:If only the site was nice... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Design for your market segment.

      This I agree with. Unfortunately I don't agree with that much more :-)

      Actually, I think you're making a smidge of a mistake with design == usability. But that's only looking at it from the point of designer anything, where look is king.

      Yeah. I really do think that's a mistake on the net. A site which is usable but ugly can be useful, even popular. A site that is pretty, but not usable, will never suceed. Perhaps a reason is that on the net your customer has to *interact* with the stuff you're making, not only passively look at it, like in TV or magazines. Personally I think many designers are much to stuck in a paper-world.

      seriously, if everything looked the same, what would the point be?

      I never said everything should look the same. I *did* however say that we don't need a "new and unique" navigation-system for every site.

      The question you gotta ask is if users will bother learning a "new and unique" navigation only for your site, or if there's more to gain from synergy and recognition-effect. You migth not like the floppy as a symbol for "save", but odds are if you choose it, even people who're using your program for the first time will recognize it as "save". For the same reason, blue, unterlined text that is *not* a link is a bad idea, even if you think it looks "different".

      If your market is ultra-hip post-cyberpunk *insert god damn stupid adjective here* that appreciates some weird, fucked up hyper-techno *insert descriptive here* interface,

      Thing is, even if the flash-intro and all-blinking all-dancing stuff is amusing to you on the first visit, it's going to get old *real* fast the moment you try to actually acomplish something with the site. Assuming it's possible to "acomplish" anything with a flash-site, which is the exception. Repeat customers are important.

      then giving them something that looks like Yahoo is gonna make 'em go to sleep.

      So give them something that looks like E14. That was never my point. I gave a long list of drawbacks of flash. All of those can be overcome in a web-site that's still nothing at all like Yahoo. A few of those can possibly even be overcome in flash, though I've never seen it done.

      Conversely, if you're peddling information to people with remarkable lack of imagination (think stock market investors or the people so afraid of the Inter-Net that they type URLs into Yahoo's search box because it's all they know) you want your interface to be as simple and straightforward as possible.

      So Google is a success because of people with remarkable lack of imagination and a great fear of anything new and/or technical ?

      I don't think so. To the contrary it seem to have won popularity first among computer professionals, hackers, nerds, technophiles. People who doesn't fall anywhere close to your stereotypes above. They like it because it fucking works. And because it doesn't insist on distracting from it's function with lots of blinking-ligths.

      Look. Noone said all websites should look the same. Noone said that Yahoo and Google, or Slashdot, is the be-all of web-design. What I *did* say was only that I have yet to see a usable site made in Flash, and I sorta doubt I'm likely to see many. I also said that I don't think it's a accident that most successfull websites put a high value on usability and have a minimum of bullshit. If you have counter-examples, feel free to say so.

    16. Re:If only the site was nice... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [rant voice="annoyed" type="run-on sentence"]
      Personally, I'd much rather view a website that's utilitarian and ugly as dirt (like slashdot's low-bandwidth option, which I use) and uses ancient HTML that works everywhere, than one that's up to current specs and visually spiffy, but I can't get where I want in my preferred browser, I have to go load up something else with all the right plugins, and then half the stuff either has to reload every time I pass by it, or I can't back/forth/bookmark/save it without hoop-jumping, or it just generally wastes my time (being on dialup) and my patience with a ton of visual crap to wade thru when all I really wanted was a product description, a basic photo, and a link to buy it.
      [/rant]

      One problem I see more and more of, and these music-file-sales sites are prime examples, is this notion that you have to put everything you're selling on the first page anyone sees. No, all that does is waste my time and their bandwidth (which the customer pays for with higher prices). All the front page needs is links to basic categories, not to everything in every category all at once!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:If only the site was nice... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think visual design of web sites is quite important, but that it is entirely secondary to useability. More websites with a strong focus on design don't look like anything at all, because they don't render properly or at all. I'm sure someone put a whole lot of work into every totally blank page I see, but their design is totally lost due to having such bad useability that I can't actually see the design.

      Within the limits of what is portable across browsers and window sizes, there's still room for a lot of variability and flashiness. If you have a techno track, you could stick an animated gif with colors throbbing based on the beat next to it. Playing the music in flash, however, just makes it less likely to work for people. And the thing about the hyper-techno market is that they're much more likely to have configured their computers is ways totally different from any other computers.

  45. Fame is more important than money by trajano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with the choice Warp records have made. There will always be people who would buy the records because they really like the group. Sharing music/art is the best way to increase the popularity of an artist.

    Its too bad that a lot people tend to look at the money instead of the art. Fame and respect I think are more important than money to an artist, if they have those they will have power to change the world.

    I personally respect artists/singers/thespians/.../programmers that do it for the art and not from the money. The Internet is the best thing that has happened to them as it gives them a low cost way of broadcasting their talent and get themselves known and respected by their peers.

    But money has its purpose too, here are somethings I would do to make money.

    What warp is doing is also respecting the people. Sure some of them may be sending them out to P2P networks, but Warp save money on dealing with legal costs.

    This money can be better utilized in advertising themselves.

    If I was Warp, I would work with radio stations to add a blurb at the end of music radio stations use to go to their website.

    Some of the lower end or archived music that is not making too much money I would put on P2P networks as long as they will provide some advertising spaces on their clients. Or the name of the song. With authorization from the artist of course. But I will not give any money to the artist at that point since its not really something that I can make profit on, but at least it will give the artist more exposure for little cost, because we'll just be putting it up on a low end, low bandwidth server probably on a home DSL line and let P2P do its work. We'll just add the ed2k hashes on the website. We would tack in information about how to go to the website within the file names and the ID3 tag.

    I would work as the middle man between an artist and concert halls or restaurant gigs. Basically add an extranet for smaller concert halls and restaurants to request artists and artists can put their availabilities on the system, kinda like a scheduler.

    I will also partner with an auction site such as eBay to sell products related to the artists.

    I would also provide a utility that would provide the creation of custom made CDs which contain songs for an artist or maybe more. Perhaps release it as a Java WebStart program so I do not have to deal with a lot of bandwidth costs for running a webapp.

    We would put in information about the song on moodlogic as well, its best to have the correct information from the source.

    Its Artists "on demand"

    --
    Archie - CIO-for-hire :-)
  46. What to download... by windside · · Score: 5, Informative

    If anyone's intrigued by this idea but hasn't heard enough Warp tracks to know what's good, I would strongly recommend checking out "Come to Daddy" by Aphex Twin. It's only 8 tracks, so it should be pretty cheap.

    "Selected Ambient Works" is also quite good, especially for those times when you want to listen to something subtle but your brother in law has borrowed your whale music CD. Seriously, this guy is very talented. And he drives a tank (no, it's not a joke link - just a strange domain).

    Finally, I'm still waiting for the Bleep page to load up, so does anyone know if their artist's videos are alsofor sale? Squarepusher's "Come On My Selector" is my favourite video of all time.

    --
    ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
    Churchill
    1. Re:What to download... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Come On My Selector" video directed by Chris Cunningham has been released on a DVD of his material from the newly formed DirectorsLabel. The DVD is available for purchase from WarpMart on www.warprecords.com, and presumably from amazon.com and bn.com

    2. Re:What to download... by labratuk · · Score: 1

      No no no. Autechre's LP5.

      My favourite album ever. (probably)

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    3. Re:What to download... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:What to download... by MesnerTrks · · Score: 1

      >Finally, I'm still waiting for the Bleep page to load up, so does anyone know if their artist's videos are alsofor sale? Squarepusher's "Come On My Selector" is my favourite video of all time

      I just got a collection of Chris Cunningham videos over Christmas and it has the Come On My Selector video on it(I have since downloaded and listened to the hell out of it :). It has some other quality shit on it(including Come to Daddy and Windowlicker) . I got it for under 15 bucks if I recall, well worth it.

      Patrick

    5. Re:What to download... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite right. In fact the track "Come to Daddy" should be the RIAA themesong. "I want you're soul... i will eat your souuullllll." I can't recal the other track names off hand, but this CD is good.

      Selected Ambient Works Volume 1 is good. Selected Ambient Works Volume 2 is off the wall insanely good. Compeletely different, stylistically from Volume 1. I think Vol.2 is what the parent was talking about in terms of "Whale Music". I think it was reviewed once as "if the monolith in '2001: A Space Odyssey' could make music, this is what it would be". Download both "CDs" of this album and listen straight through. Great to code or paint to.

      Druqs has some crazy stuff. a lot is not that great, but track 10 disc 1 "10 Mt. Saint Michel Mix+St. Michaels Mount" is very fast, very cool, and very loud.

      Then you can always download Aphex Twin's Pacman or Tetris remixes... rule.

    6. Re:What to download... by Schemer · · Score: 1

      I'd start with the Richard D. James Album myself... then Come to Daddy and Seleceted Ambient Works 2.

      --
      A buddhist walks up to a hot dog stand and says ``Make me one with everything.''
    7. Re:What to download... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      What kind of music does aphex twin do?

    8. Re:What to download... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Squarepusher's "Come On My Selector" is on the CD as an extra, I think its on Big Loada, I can't remember, the one with the track on it.

    9. Re:What to download... by windside · · Score: 1

      Does the DVD have a title? Where did you pick it up?

      --
      ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
      Churchill
  47. Nobody!? NOBODY!!??? by Luke+the+Obscure · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I don't know if you were going for Flamebait but I have a feeling you stepped on a few toes...

    Most of the Warp artists are VERY popular with the music Snobbish Elite, and less so with the General Masses.

    As a card carrying music snob, I am happy to say that Boards of Canada is the best band in the entire universe (this is a fact, by the way, not an opinion), and I am happy to see this little development.

  48. more info... the bleep check out experience by robdeadtech · · Score: 5, Interesting
    WARP, for those who don't visit the site often have a pretty damn insane site. luckily they backed off the whacked out design features at bleep.com but the experience is still definitely "warp."

    The catalog is a bit light on the options but there's definitely some tasty aphex twin in there and some prefuse73 and others. The sections currently are:

    The check out and download was quite simple: Most of the detail below...

    1. Registration was quite easy. just name email address and password.

    2. they're taking paypal and mc/visa and SMS text message.

    3. They report as you put things in your cart. "Total download size" of my purchase in XX.XX MB and Estimated download time (via 512K DSL/Cable)in MM:SS. The 512k DSL measure is actually accurate for my connection so I'm not sure if they are sniffing or if that is just a metric they decided to standardize on.

    4. With my purchases, (indeed the old Aphex Twin stuff (good stuff BTW)) I tried to use paypal and got a " Waiting for a paypal payment report..." in the checkout pane and it kept refreshing but reporting nothing.

    5. So I bit my lip and hit the back button (I'm using Mozilla 1.6b). and amazingly enough was actually back at my Paypal Credit/Debit Card option.

    6. Checkout was pretty standard and very straightforward with a few unusual options I wasn't used to (I'm from the U.S. so maybe some of this stuff is normal in the U.K./Europe)

    7. Interestingly theres the follow card descriptions in the dropdown. Electron Eurocard Mastercard Visa Visa Debit

    8. Expiry date are xx Month and xxxx year which is nice unlike the annoying (to me anyway) spelling of the month option

    9. There is also a "For Switch and Solo cards only:" Section with "Start Date:" "Issue Number:" fields

    10. Strangely you then only have the option to add this information you've filled out to your profile.

    11. You then loop through a more normal check out where you can select the card you want to use from a dropdown or add a new card (presumably you'd loop through what I just went through)

    12. and you get "When you select 'Process Order' below your card will be debited with the total amount of $X.XX" info and are given a process order button.

    13. The frame refreshes and you get "ORDER CONFIRMATION" message and "Your order has been processed succesfully." and a "DOWNLOAD YOUR ORDER" option.

    14. It chugged a bit then spit back my dowloads as one big zip or as each track. with the following info below. "Click on the links above to download your tracks. PC users: You will be presented with a 'Save As...' dialog box, use this to choose the location on your local hard drive you wish to save the file too. MAC users: By default tracks will download to your Desktop, unless you have specified otherwise in your browser preferences."

    15. I selected the ZIP option and the frame reloads with a bit of chugging then

    "ZIPPING YOUR ORDER" "Your order is zipped and ready for download..." "Once your order has started downloading then you may continue browsing the site."and a "DOWNLOADS" button to click.

    16: the Download time was respectable even with the site getting slashdotted and every IDM geek, all of which are plugged into computers incessantly (ahem... unlike myself. That's why I'm so tan... or something...), checking it out at the same time.

    17: oh also, across the top nav you get the following options: LOGGED IN AS emailuser@emailaddress.tld - LOG OUT - YOUR ORDER - DOWNLOADS - PREFERENCES - FAQ - HELP - That's pretty much it. Damn well done I'd say.

    --
    Heil Sig! -Rob
    1. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by robdeadtech · · Score: 4, Informative

      okay.. so the single downloads actually have the artist and track title. like this "AFX - Hangable Auto Bulb.mp3"

      But the zipped-up downloads aren't the same. They look like this. "01.mp3"

      The problem is when you select two different albums you get two different say "01.mp3" files in your zip. If you drag and drop your zip contents into a folder on your desktop the OS doesn't like that one "01.mp3" lands on your desktop then another shows up out of the zip so it asks if you want to overwrite. Thus nuking the first 01.mp3 you had.

      If you do the actual "extract" you'll get two folders named ex: WAP66 and WAP67 which is better though not what I would call descriptive (though this might be the warp release #) and the filenames inside the folder are that "01.mp3" style name.

      Not so great. but this should be a fairly easy fix and I'd still buy other tracks.

      --
      Heil Sig! -Rob
    2. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by six809 · · Score: 1
      for x in *; do y=`echo $x|sed 's/.mp3/_/'``id3info $x|grep '^=== TIT'|tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'|sed 's/.*: //;s/[^a-z0-9]/_/g'`; mv "$x" "$y".mp3; done
      Add sugar and milk to taste.
    3. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by etymxris · · Score: 1

      Egads, this sounds like a QA test script. I think we would have gotten the idea without quite as much detail.

    4. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by dl_kleber · · Score: 1

      Hey.. one of those things that there just want time for before live.. needless to say hopefully early next week the zips will have properly named files in them :) weve got to sleep some time.. :)

    5. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "But the zipped-up downloads aren't the same. They look like this. "01.mp3""

      If the files are tagged, there are plenty of tools to do a batch-rename from track name/album/track number in the ID1 tag. Just do a search, or try your normal software download lists.

    6. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      Looks like bleep is using Paypal's IPN service. IPN is supposed to mean 'Instant Payment Notification', but I do not frequently find it to be 'instant' at all. You may actually have to wait a little while until paypal notifies them that your payment went through, they do a little handshake and then, kapow, your downloads are available.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    7. Re:more info... the bleep check out experience by MatSimpsk · · Score: 1
      A bit late in the day to reply, but in case you're watching

      Have a look in Preferences. It looks like you can choose how you want the files named. Not had a chance to test it yet... my first order is still downloading :)

  49. Let's just hope... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that they succeed, because if they fail, DRM really will be unstoppable (not technically, of course).

    --


    Tierce
    Who sponsors your feelings?
  50. I've posted this before by Not+Quite+Jake · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...but here it goes again. there is a digital download service featuring independent artists called audiolunchbox that offers DRM free decently high quality mp3 and ogg downloads, it's great and is comparable in price to all the other services so far available. the slashdot crowd needs to pick up on this and fast, we can show the recording industry that this is what we want.

    1. Re:I've posted this before by madgeorge · · Score: 1

      Thank you. In fact, if it was your post I read before, thank you twice. I've been totally addicted to audiolunchbox since I read the last /. article on the subject. Some of my favorite downloads: Muggs, J Boogie, hOMe for the Holidays, and teh best fucking blues I've heard in a long time - The Black Keys. Oh, hello??? OGG downloads???

      I'm glad others are following market demand and giving geeks what they want: good music, good quality, best distribution model on the planet, fair price. I'll be sharing my paycheck with Bleep, as well.

      -madgeorge

  51. Didn't see anything in there... by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    What happens if the connection fails halfway through a download? Do you have a way of recovering? Is there a window of a few hours or days within which you can download files without limit?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Didn't see anything in there... by robdeadtech · · Score: 1

      unfortunately it doesn't look like it.
      Though I've ordered through Warps site before (vinyl)and they have always been more than cool.

      I bought a warped record from them (yeah, the irony...) and i offered to return the record back as proof. They sent me a new record and said "just keep the old one. no sense in paying for shipping a bum record. maybe it'll be a collectors item or something someday."

      --
      Heil Sig! -Rob
    2. Re:Didn't see anything in there... by FromWithin · · Score: 1

      It keeps a record of what you have bought as part of your profile. When you finish downloading something, it disappears from your record. The policy states quite clearly that they only allow you to download once.

    3. Re:Didn't see anything in there... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      It probably will, however, let you re-start the file if it does not finish, they don't want people sharing accounts or using their service to access their music from anywhere, as that bandwith usage would be too expensive to stay in buisness

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  52. Re:Mp3? Bleh by halo1982 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Why not use Ogg Vorbis?

    taken from the bleep.com faq section...

    Q: WHY MP3 ?
    A: MP3 is the most popular and universal format for digital music. It is the format that people most want, that is the easiest to play freely without any restrictions. We are also considering selling other files formats such as the second generation of lossy formats such as AAC or ogg or even lossless compressed formats such as FLAC or Monkeysaudio. If people are willing to pay a premium for the bandwidth cost they incur, then even 24bit versions of files could be sold.

  53. Cool by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    Warp Records allready was my favorite record label. This is a good signal towards other record labels.

  54. My Quick Review by MunchMunch · · Score: 5, Informative
    I clicked over to the site and just decided to look up Plaid, one of my favorite artists. And, lo and behold, there was an EP vinyl release, Booc, that I hadn't even heard about. I could download individual tracks for $1.35, or the whole 4 song set for $4.29.

    I clicked on the Add to Cart link for the set (ignoring the preview streams, since honestly, I would buy it anyways), and after checking the privacy policy (nothing will be sold, bartered, sent to you, etc for any reason) I tried to create a new account. I was told my email was already in use, and found out that the old regular warprecords.com accounts were conveniently auto-generated for bleep.com, so I just signed in, passed through the normal checkout stuff, entered in my credit card, and two clicks later I had the option of downloading individual tracks or a ZIP of all the music.

    I opened this ZIP and found that they were named "01.mp3; 02.mp3" and so on. Sort of annoying, that. The quality is standard 128-320 kb/sec VBR MP3. Winamp gave the MP3s the following properties:

    MPEG 1.0 layer 3 (VBR)

    44100Hz Joint Stereo

    CRCs: No

    Copyrighted: No

    Original: Yes

    Emphasis: None

    The ID3v1+2 tags were entered in fully, and included the following description in "encoded by":

    LAME 3.90.3 --alt-preset standard

    AFAIK, LAME is the best encoder out there, so Warp apparently knows what they're doing. The MP3s sound great. One caveat--when you buy a song or album, you are buying *that download*. Downloads did not remain in any way accessible after the initial post-purchase links were accessed, so you had better hope the download doesn't get broken or lost.

    The Good

    --Quality encoding, even if it is VBR.

    --No DRM (obviously)

    --Fast download

    --Easy to use store and site navigation

    --ID3 Tags fully filled out

    --Album prices are great

    The Bad

    --Generic filenames

    --Downloads aren't held as permissions on the site for redownload later

    --Single download prices could be better (blame UK conversion)

    All in all, I liked Warp before and that might influence how useful this site is to me, but I was satisfied with only a few very small problems, and am looking forward to more downloads.

    1. Re:My Quick Review by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Wow, I am impressed as well. According to the 'experts' (I don't use the term lightly since the people there surely DO know what they're talking about) over at Hydrogen Audio also reccommend those LAME version/settings over the newer 3.93+ versions for higher quality encodes.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:My Quick Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      --Quality encoding, even if it is VBR.

      wtf?
      VBR is the only way to go for a high quality/size ratio, and the only settings that would be better than --alt-preset standard is preset extreme (which doesn't really gain much in quality, only size) or just flat out 320kbps (preset insane). both these settings would add a lot to the file size.
      and, yup, lame 3.90.3 is best lame version for use with the presets. so they absolutely know what they're doing.
      this is as good as it gets for mp3, if they want to do any better they'd have to encode with flac...

      btw, take a look at the forums over at hydrogenaudio.org

    3. Re:My Quick Review by MunchMunch · · Score: 1
      "--Quality encoding, even if it is VBR.

      wtf?

      VBR is the only way to go for a high quality/size ratio, and the only settings that would be better than --alt-preset standard is preset extreme (which doesn't really gain much in quality, only size) or just flat out 320kbps (preset insane)."

      Well, yeah, it's a question of efficiency. I did a paper for a Psychoacoustics class I took last year, and when I did some spectral analyzations and listening tests of VBR encoded MP3s that I had modified (by adding different frequencies that would be masked according to the psychoacoustic model), I found that older LAME sometimes discarded audible sound in the VBR encode that was retained in the CBR mode. I couldn't entirely explain what was causing it, but it didn't happen in CBR encodes.

      That said, that was an older version, and I haven't done extensive cross-version LAME testing, since this stuff is probably much improved. My personal rips are an admittedly insane 320 kbps--just because I have the HD space and that way I don't have to make sure I'm not missing anything.

      Of course, another post here mentioned that Warp is thinking of lossless, even 24-bit(!) versions, so they're waaaay ahead of me already.

    4. Re:My Quick Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your personal rips... At that bitrate, why not just use FLAC rather then MP3?

    5. Re:My Quick Review by Dulimano · · Score: 3, Informative

      "--Generic filenames"

      They have a preference menu with a

      "Preferred file-naming convention:"

      Options are:
      Autechre - Flutter.mp3
      03 - Autechre - Flutter.mp3
      WAP54-03.mp3

    6. Re:My Quick Review by Asmodean451 · · Score: 1

      As a note about the single prices:

      They have a lot more singles than albums, many of them quite rare. It makes sense that they price the singles higher. They have albums for as cheap as $4.25 anyway.

      Fuck me, my harddrive is screwed. ;)

    7. Re:My Quick Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are all idiots. Huffman coding, the VBR coding in mp3s, is lossless.

    8. Re:My Quick Review by Dunkirk · · Score: 1

      You didn't say what platform you were on, but if you're on Linux, you might try EasyTag. It comes with my distro (SuSE); it may already be on yours. Don't let the cheesy web site fool you. It's a great little program. It can backfill id3 tags from filenames, or rename files according to id3 tags. It can do whole trees of files at once (like to label the artist). It has a neat feature which will autonumber a whole directory of files to track numbers. I've been using all of these features to clean up my own ogg collection from all the different ways I've ripped my own stuff over the years.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    9. Re:My Quick Review by djsable · · Score: 1

      Regarding the file names issue. If you are on Windows there is a program called Renamer (free to download, check download .com) that allows to rename whole groups of songs based on the ID3 tag. Fully configurable, you can arrange the items in any order. It took me about 10 seconds to rename all the files from one release to Artist - Album - Track# - Song.mp3. worked perfectly, and is very useful.

  55. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  56. Soulseek by Doomrat · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...perhaps the fact that a lot of people share the entire Warp collection on Soulseek was an instigating factor for the launch of this service?

  57. 24-bit by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If people are willing to pay a premium for the bandwidth cost they incur, then even 24bit versions of files could be sold.

    That's very impressive, as long as they don't insist on gouging customers for bandwidth. It shouldn't cost more than $2 tops to transfer a full 24-bit album uncompressed.

    This is the future of digital music downloads, at least for real music enthusiasts and hardcore fans: get the original masters, higher quality than CDs. I can't stress enough that this is a good thing.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    1. Re:24-bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, if we estimate a 16-bit CD at holding 600MB of music data, a 24-bit version of the same CD would use up almost 1GB. Maybe in some areas you can transfer data at $2/GB, but sure as hell not everywhere.

    2. Re:24-bit by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Google bandwidth "cents per gig". Tons of hits a 50 cents per gig and quite a few at 22 cents per gig. A 24 bit album would also losslessly compress to a half gig or less. So we are looking at something like a 10 to 30 cent premium over the price of an ordinary MP3 album. On a $5 album you are talking 2% to 6% premium for 24 bit lossless.

      Bandwidth costs are NEGLIGABLE.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:24-bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to introduce a new concept to you.

      It's called "the rest of the world". Sure, bandwidth is cheap in Japan, or the USA. Not so lucky for everyone. If I was to download a 1GB file on the connection here at work, it would cost ME directly about US$90, on top of whatever extra charges bleep added to my bill.

    4. Re:24-bit by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Allow me to introduce a new concept to you.
      It's called "the rest of the world". Sure, bandwidth is cheap in Japan, or the USA. Not so lucky for everyone.


      If you want to go into business selling downloads then you buy hosting services from the cheapest company. Your best bet is most likely one of the massive server farms in the US.

      However you appear to be talking about the customer's bandwidth costs, which aren't really relevant to what I was discussing. If you are worried about your home bill for downloading being $90 per gig, well then obviously you aren't likely to select a 1 gig file to download. You are perfectly free to select and download a 3 meg MP3 version.

      My point was that the company selling downloads should offer all sorts of formats. For them bandwidth costs are an absolutely negligible part of their equation. They are equally happy with customer A buying a 40 meg MP3 D/L for $4.95 and customer B buying a 350 meg lossless D/L of the same album for $5.10. Customers with expensive bandwith will simply choose option A.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  58. The Question by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    Will others take note of this and follow suit? Exactly how successful does this have to be, in terms of number of songs sold or amount of revenue generated, before other services will reconsider their business practices and drop WMA for MP3/OGG/insert-codec-of-choice-here, axe the DRemember-R-is-for-RestrictionsM, change prices, or any combination of the above? Given enough success, this could be the start of a revolution, or it could be just one bastion of sensibility in a desert of corporate lunacy.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  59. Selling Back Catalogs by lukior · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. The labels should put all of their music available for download. Unfortunately, sales of older music would cannibalize sales of the newer ultra marketed artists. For the labels this is antathema to everything they believe in because if they can't take the artists profit and claim it was spent on marketing they might have to pay them.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    1. Re:Selling Back Catalogs by darkov · · Score: 1

      I think for the bigger oligopolist labels this is true. But what Warp has done is what every small label should do - cut out the middleman and go straight to the consumer. It's the only way to overthrow the big labels that are causing all the problems. And it's what the big labels are afraid of.

      Also I think that people new to a certain style of music or a certain label would probably have the opposite effect you're talking about - they listen to a classic older track as an introduction and end up buying later releases too.

    2. Re:Selling Back Catalogs by lukior · · Score: 1

      I agree. I know that when i find an artist I really like i will get all the music that they have ever produced this includes bootlegs and live shows and unreleased tracks. The artist doesn't usually make a dime off of me from this though. I will definitely go to the show of an artist that I listen to their music though and sometimes I will buy a t-shirt. I've driven over three hours to get to shows so I could hear someone live. I think in the end the artist makes more money from me getting their music illicitly than those who buy their music through the labels.

      --
      I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
  60. You mindset is completely commercialized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck, why do people think that when they for their music, it is best to look for what is most heavily thrown at them. Usually it's sh** that flies best.
    Get yourself some new experience and make your own choice. Try sth. out and see yourself. The net technically is probably one of the best chances for music to return from marketing to quality content. Try to be part of that and don't ask for the next hype wave to catch and drive you like a boat without rudder.

  61. Boards of Canada: Music Has The Right To Children by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I got this album off Emusic last year, and now it has crawled inside my brain and won't get out. I'm not big into electronic music, but I listen to a lot of stuff, so I figured I'd add this. The first few times through it doesn't seem like much of anything, but then it gets hold of you and won't let go.

    I got several different Boards of Canada albums and eps from Emusic, as well as music by other Warp artists. (They were available on Emusic back when I had an account, I don't know about now.) So I'm legal. I don't need to buy these albums from the Warp website. But I also know that Emusic paid the artists basically nothing, so I figured I'd head over to the Warp website to pay a second time for some records I've really enjoyed.

    Before I got to the website, I decided that the sweet spot was $5. I'm willing to pay -- A SECOND TIME -- $5 for each Boards of Canada album I downloaded from Emusic. (Since Emusic had no download limit back then, everyone on the service, including me, was basically downloading everything they could find -- hey, I found some bands like Boards of Canada!)

    But when I got to the Warp website, the price was $10. No way. Vinyl cost $5 when I was growing up, and there's no good reason music should cost any more than that now. It costs less to produce now, and it costs less to distribute. $10/album is too high.

    So Boards of Canada has my admiration, and I appreciate what Warp is trying to do, but $5 is the point where my wallet opens up. I guess I'm just not in the "target audience," even though I like the music.

    --
    Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
  62. Not just ambient techno ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also have Nine Inch Nails, Nightmares on Wax and various other bands that kick ass.

  63. Warp's "Artificial Intelligence" albums by zonix · · Score: 1

    They're also a very open label.

    I have the 1992 Polygon Window (aka Richard D. James aka. Aphex Twin) - "Surfing On Sine Waves" album. On the back of the CD there's a nice little bit that reads:

    This is the second in a series of (Artificial Intelligence) albums from Warp. If you think on the same wave length, contact/send tapes to Warp Records ... [address].

    Today they even employ well known sceners like Lassi Nikko (aka. Dune/Orange, BrothomStates), and even sell albums from other less known independent labels featuring other well known sceners like Jaakko Manninen (aka. Mellow-D, MD).

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  64. Well, it just makes good business sense, but by holy+zarquon's+singi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not for the big guys.

    What I want to see, (and if any of you venture capitalists out there want to pump some money into it, contact me through slashdot) is [story follows]:

    When I lived in Indonesia a few years ago (well, about 20) we used to go to the [pirate] tape shop. We (that's the entire family, mum, dad, me and definately baby brother) would spend hours in the Delta tape shop listening to music at a table on headphones, deciding what of that music we wanted to buy, and then buying what we liked (prices were cheap). I was 10. I bought Pink Floyd, Kraftwerk, the Chipmunks, Hall and Oates (I am ashamed of that one), Hooked on Classics (a bit embarassed about that), Queen, the Police, The Who, and more music than the average 10 year old would find difficult to imagine, both in terms of quantity and quality. It was a nice social event, and I have very fond memories of it.

    Now. I have recently fixed up my old CDs to live on a new 30gb hard drive and a dedicated ogg player - old p100 laptop with the jukebox running as root so that ogg123 can run nice -20 or whatever, so I'm sold on digital formats for music rather than having to rely on one piece of removable media per artist or compilation. However downloads do not cut it for me. Me, and most of the rest of the global population are stuck on dialup or no convenient internet access whatsoever. But, we would benifit from the digital revolution.

    So: what I want to see is a shop with a load of tables and a load of headphones [you can see where this is going], in a real bricks and mortar shop where you can listen to potential purchases burn CDs, save to removal media, save to hard drive, your iPod and so on. You sell your tracks or albums at a reasonable price, you turn your shop into a social hub, and you can carry an enormous back catalogue, beyond the wildest dreams of music stores as they currently exist. More by using tools like debian's apt-proxy. As far as I can see, this would be like a licence to print money once you get the labels or the artists on board.

    So, what would it take. A few terabytes of storage. Cooperation from a critical mass of music distributors. A couple to a few months of time for a small team of programmers.

    So, who's going to do it. I'm available as a consultant.

    --
    "...we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that." B.Spears 2003
    1. Re:Well, it just makes good business sense, but by MatthewB79 · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is a great idea. For Warp or other smallish labels to partner with local music shops and split the cost of distribution makes good business sense. But like you said, the big labels can't do this sort of thing. Not because they would lose money on it, and probably not because they don't want to. Ultimately, the distributors will not let them.
      There's a symbiotic relationship between the distributor and the publisher. That's really what this backlash (DRM, RIAA goons, etc.) is all about. The guys who own the bricks and mortar warehouses and box trucks that bring the CD's to the record shop like things the way they are and don't see why it should be any different.

  65. Same Aphex Twin record going for 100 GBP on Ebay by robdeadtech · · Score: 1

    So you could buy those two Aphex Twin Hangable Auto Bulb records on vinyl at Ebay for $185 US dollars (at the least, there's 21 bids and over 5 hours to go in the bidding) or download the whole thing like I did at bleep for 6 bucks and some change. Score!

    --
    Heil Sig! -Rob
  66. songs.co.il by mericet · · Score: 1

    www.songs.co.il (hebrew site) offers a similar service for mainstream israeli music, and is operated by a major Israeli record label (NMC), is offering music marginally cheaper than iTunes and the like, in a vanilla MP3 format (with WMA previews). Plus, new albums are released online (usually hours but sometimes days) before the disk is released, and there are options for per track or whole disk purchase.

  67. But if they trust their customers... by zoeblade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...why is Drukqs a corrupt "copy protected" CD in Germany? Was it re-mastered by another company beyond Warp's control or something?

    1. Re:But if they trust their customers... by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, this is the work of the German distributor. I have the UK Warp release, and it is not copy protected.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  68. Re:Mp3? Bleh by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you ever heard ogg comapred to mp3 at the same bitrate? It is fairly superior and my hearing isnt even all that good. As a matter of fact I can't hear all that well and I can still tell the difference. I'm not deaf or anything, but my hearing isn't superb like most crazy audio codec people claim. Linux wasn't popular in '91, but we pushed it and its hitting mainstream now. Ogg may not be popular now but its made alot of progress especially considering that it is compatible with some portable players. If we push it hard enough then maybe we can let Ogg be the standard for DRM-free music.
    Regards,
    Steve
    P.S. And its community is far larger then 1056. Where did you get this number from?

  69. Bonus!!! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    For one thing, I have a bunch of stuff from Warp, but I'm always looking for more. And now the fact that they DON'T support DRM, that is just too righteous! I'm going over to buy some stuff now... :) Thank you Warp!

  70. Soundmurderer by mindaktiviti · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shameless promotion...more or less.

    If you want to support good record labels you can also check out rewind-records.com which is owned by Soundmurderer, who is also signed to Rephlex (Aphex Twin's label). In the Rewind Single's section there are all decent quality mp3s you can download.

    Soundmurderer & SK1 have their CD out here: http://www.rephlex.com/2001releases/rew001/rew001c d.html

    and I just got the go-ahead to update their website with tracks on their singles at www.rewind-records.com, so check it out if you like Ragga jungle. :)

  71. Re:Boards of Canada: Music Has The Right To Childr by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Vinyl cost $5 when I was growing up

    In what year were you "growing up," and what was the median wage then?

    and there's no good reason music should cost any more than that now. It costs less to produce now

    What makes you think that? Production (not reproduction) of copyrighted works is a process of research and development, and historically, R&D has been labor-bound. Promotion is also labor-bound. The price in dollars of labor will tend to rise over time; see "cost-push inflation" in any economics book for the details.

  72. Take it all. by joehahn · · Score: 0
    --
    *I used to be quite irreverent and ignorant. I am probably much smarter now. I seem to realize this every 45 days or so.
  73. Bleep by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I was playing this song... you know... when my computer starts going "bleep bleep bleep"...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  74. What About Insurance? by estergum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK say you have 400 CD's.

    Keep good enough record and you can buy them back from the insurance when some shite steals them.

    What if the bugger steals you computer with 400 CD's worth on your hard drive?

    Thats like 4-6 grand worth to get your collection back (assuming 10 song per CD on average)

    With the insurance I have I'm SOL.

    What about yours?

    1. Re:What About Insurance? by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then you just redownload the tracks via P2P. You've already paid the artist/label for the right to own and listen to a copy, so no guilt there.

    2. Re:What About Insurance? by Ronny+Cook · · Score: 1
      What if the bugger steals you computer with 400 CD's worth on your hard drive?

      That's what backups are for. (You do make backups, right?)

      400 CDs at about a 10% compression ratio can be burned onto 40 CD-Rs at a fixed cost of under $20. I doubt that your insurance premiums are that cheap.

    3. Re:What About Insurance? by Nimloth · · Score: 0
      Well since there isn't any form of DRM, it's your chance to BACK THE WHOLE THING UP...

      ..TWICE!

  75. i know how they feel by fabio · · Score: 0

    sometimes, i go bleep too!

    not that it matters, but i do!

    erhm? are we talking the same thing here?

    bleep

    --
    *resistance is futile, or fuzzy, i dunno*
  76. Nobody has ever heard of most of these artists? by msimm · · Score: 1

    The thing with music you have to realize is for every good artist you can name there are thousands of equally good artists you can't name. There is a supply chain bottleneck and if you believe for one second that the only good music is the music that gets listed on Billboard you've simply bought into the marketing you've been drowning in.

    I know I'm not a perfect example of a mainstream music listener, I was a musician (not a good one) and a early internet adopter (broadband too) so I've been poking around a lot more then the average person has probably had the time or patience to.

    But just take it on faith, there is some really wonderful music out there. The internets one true charm has been serving music and art on a scale we could only dream of before.

    If you don't discover it yourself your children will. Human creativity is truly amazing. And you think it really starts and stops with the names you know? Ouch!

    --
    Quack, quack.
  77. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drm is useless anyway
    all you have to do is to write a driver that emulates a sound card and writes its wave input as a wav. or even better -- loop your normal sound card digital out into digital in. set the volume to max and get LO$$LE$$ conversion to any normal format.
    I'm quite surprised that I never could read that approach to DRM on the net.

    1. Re:who cares? by alecto · · Score: 1

      Those will work so long as you're not using Windows ME or Windows XP, which include Secure Audio Path. An unsigned or non SAP-enabled soundcard driver won't have access to the raw PCM stream when playing a DRMd file. And when playing DRM files that require it, the signed drivers forcefully turn off the digital output on the soundcard. From here, things will only get worse if Palladium/NGCSB/TCPA/anti-fair-use-scheme-of-the-w eek becomes the law of the land.

    2. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok then, I'll find back my "good" old Win98 for ripping DRM :)

  78. Mmmmmm. Magnatune. by msimm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Mmmmmm. Magnatune.
    1) Williamson
    2) Version
    3) Solace
    There's plenty more, but that should get you started.
    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re: Mmmmmm. Magnatune. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the links! I just purchased the Williamson CD, it is some good stuff. I didn't care for Solace and have not tried Version yet.

      I thought Magnatunes had Flac? I only see wav, 128kb MP3 and high quality VBR MP3. I grabbed the VBR MP3, though I would have liked Flac.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    2. Re: Mmmmmm. Magnatune. by magnatune · · Score: 1

      "I thought Magnatunes had Flac? I only see wav, 128kb MP3 and high quality VBR MP3. I grabbed the VBR MP3, though I would have liked Flac." The Magnatune RAID array crashed last week, and I don't back up the FLAC files, since I have a script to recreate them which takes just a few days. That Williamson album you bought is now available once again as a FLAC. -john

    3. Re: Mmmmmm. Magnatune. by brakk · · Score: 1

      It's people like you that are the reason they only play shit on the radio. Pop "music" (what's played on the radio) is neither music nor art anymore. It is a product that is manufactured by large corporations and consumed by people like you.

      You don't have to be a fringe indy-artist nerd to find new music. Just listen to some new stuff and decide for yourself if you like it or not. Go to clubs, when you hear something you like, ask the DJ what it is (they like to know that people like what they play even if they don't act like it). Go to some non chain music stores and buy a mix cd in a genre you like and pick out which artist you like and buy some of their CDs or other mix albums with that same artist on it.

      It's really not hard to come up with your own style and stop letting corporate owned radio stations spoon feed you shit.

    4. Re: Mmmmmm. Magnatune. by k12linux · · Score: 1

      John... I really like being able to re-download if needed, btw. Good work.

  79. Music Monopolies by joey+shabadu · · Score: 0

    Go directly to Jail! Do not pass Go! Do not collect $200 !

  80. their bands are irrelavant by auzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't really matter who their bands are, they are still doing stuff for the best interest of us (they dont really need to). Artists do need to start somewhere, and MP3's are the best way, the RIAA tries to punish smaller artists. If all the smaller companies do something like this, the amount of variety on our radio's once again will be massive, instead of the same 20 songs being played over and over again, the ones being pushed by the big companies. So, no matter how small the music distributor, this is great for us and all musicians, because maybe for once we wont need to put up fully with the teeny boppers choice of music on the radio, because everyones choice of music will become broad enough that we wont just be listening to what the major music companies shove down our throats

  81. well for starters ME by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    er... If you don't know Autechre or Aphex Twin, you just don't know electronic music. Period.

    I was introduced to Autechre via an IRC acquaintance of mine. They're a band that's been experimenting with weird stuff in electronic music for about 12 years.

    Go and check some of their stuff out. Aphex Twin's "Selected Ambient Works Volume II" is a true classic of the genre and a great personal favorite. Autechre's "Chiastic Slide" is another good one.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  82. $10 albums :) by danb_was_taken · · Score: 1

    Resonably priced music. Ingenious. I think $10 is a good price for an album; I don't not think $15-$20 is. Way to go Warp, Bleep, et al!

  83. This is great! I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some quick notes... easy signup, intuitive interface and the canadian dollar is flying high now (haha USD is collapsing!)

    I opted for the zipped package of what I bought (6 tracks) downloading at 81 KB/sec (while slashdotted!) quite nice.

    The whole process, browsing to completed download took ~ 20 mins.

    excellent music, excellent label, excellent service. I'm into electronica and I've been waiting for EXACTLY THIS to appear. Price is a bit on the high side, but considering the quality (avg 200+ kbps VBR, this is high-fi... they know their lame) and _especially_ file format -- unfettered MP3, it's currently justifiable.

    very good move. bravo! clapping here, not kidding. I'm telling my friends about this

  84. Re:Seriously people... by setanor · · Score: 1

    Boards of Canada
    Geogaddi
    #19 Billboard Heatseekers chart
    #3 Billboard Electronic Albums chart
    #10 Billboard Independent Albums chart

    Twoism
    #16 Billboard Electronic Albums chart

    Aphex Twin
    Richard D. James Album
    #20 Billboard Heatseekers chart

    Drukqs
    #2 Billboard Heatseekers chart
    #154 Billboard Top 200 Albums chart
    #6 Billboard Electronic Albums chart

    26 Mixes for Cash
    #29 Billboard Heatseekers
    #3 Billboard Electronic
    #18 Billboard Independent

    Autechre
    Gantz Graf
    #14 Billboard Hot Dance chart

    Draft 7.30
    #9 Billboard Electronic
    #40 Billboard Independent

    and so on...

  85. RDJ references. by zonix · · Score: 1
    Nobody has ever heard of most of these artists.

    You may not have heard of their names but there's a chance you might have heard their music. Aphex Twin is Richard D. James and he uses several aliases including Polygon Window and Caustic Window which are also featured on Warp Records.

    Maybe you remember these following references:

    • The movie 8MM, in the last scene the bad guy "Machine" plays the track "Come To Daddy" from the 1997 Aphex Twin EP by the same name.
    • The movie Blade, in the first scene with Tracy Lords and the unfortunate fella in the car (no not the blood shower sequence with New Order - the one before that). In this scene you hear the 1992 Polygon Window: "Surfin On Sinewaves" - can't remember the track.
    • The Pirelli TV commercial? You know, the one where Carl Lewis runs through Manhatten? It's from the Caustic Window: "Joyrex J9" EP and the track is called "Aphex Dub".
    • One of the TV spot on Discovery also features a track from one of Aphex Twins' "Selected Ambient Works" albums. It's the TV spot with the photographer taking pictures of the Aurora Borealis.

    There are more.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:RDJ references. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the anti-drug commercial I've seen that hilariously uses an Aphex track(4, the first track on the rdj album)as background music.
      The irony of Aphex in an anti-drug commercial is staggering.

  86. YBT. YHL. HAND. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha

  87. Thanks, Designer's Republic by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I now have yet another site to show to people so they can see how not to integrate Flash with a site.

    Hover-scrolling arrows for text? Navigation elements mysterious and small? Strange layouts that are hard to read, regardless of how big or small your browser window is?

    As much as I thought DR was cool in high school, they have not changed one whit since 1997. They are just too cool for you.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  88. Aphex Twin == Richard D. James by zonix · · Score: 2, Interesting
    [...] featuring artists such as Aphex Twin [...]

    That should have read "Richard D. James". He uses several aliases including Caustic Window and Polygon Window which are also featured on Warp Records.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Aphex Twin == Richard D. James by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, that's a bit anal considering the fact that it seems like most Warp artists have some sort of side project. Instead of listing 'Autechre', let's just say 'Rob Brown and Sean Booth', since there was that one side project Gescom among others.

      Besides that, Richard James hasn't released an album under the name "Richard D. James" so... isn't this kind of pointless? And don't bring up the Richard D James album, because that was still under Aphex

    2. Re:Aphex Twin == Richard D. James by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      and don't forget AFX! of his aliases, Aphex Twin is his most well known.

    3. Re:Aphex Twin == Richard D. James by zonix · · Score: 1
      and don't forget AFX! of his aliases, Aphex Twin is his most well known.

      Yes, of course, but he uses that alias on the Rephlex label (his own). ;-)

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    4. Re:Aphex Twin == Richard D. James by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      no, he's released stuff under AFX with warp, check out bleep.com, you can get stuff by AFX. at least we can both agree on the fact that he rocks 8)

  89. bleep? obFeiss! by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

    "I was downloading music on the PC, and it was, like, bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep. And then, like, half of my music was gone. And I was, like, heh. It devoured my music. It was really good electronic music from warp records. And then I had to do it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good. It's kind of a bummer."

    --
    Free as in mason.
  90. awesome. by Kargan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a long-time Warp/SKAM fan, I couldn't be happier to see something like this both for them and for us. Also, it looks like if you're running IE on Windows (and presumably at least some other browser/OS configuration) you can also stream every one of the audio files, so the whole thing is even "listen before you buy".

    As an avid mp3 trader, I can see myself using this a lot. Stuff I could only find before @128k bitrate (not good enough), or wasn't able to find, etc.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  91. Critics by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    "DJ Phase writes "Warp Records, an independent label for electronic music (featuring artists such as Aphex Twin, Autechre, and Boards of Canada), has made their entire back catalog available thru Bleep, a new digital download service. Individual tracks are $1.35 for those of us in the USA, with EPs and full albums in the $4 to $10 price range. You can download Aphex Twin's rare, groundbreaking Hangable Auto Bulb EP for $4.29. To quote from the FAQ: 'We are at present the only store to offer very high quality MP3 files,' and 'Bleep music has no DRM or copy protection built in. We believe that most people like to be treated as customers and not potential criminals'."

    Well, here's another label trying to SCREW US OVER! You see, they're trying to kill off music download services so they can hike up CD sales.

    "has made their entire back catalog available thru Bleep, a new digital download service."

    Oh....ok...well......they're still gonna gouge us on prices!

    "with EPs and full albums in the $4 to $10 price range. You can download Aphex Twin's rare, groundbreaking Hangable Auto Bulb EP for $4.29."

    Oh...well, aside from sounding a bit too obviously like a press release, um......ok. But, but they'll be DRMed to all hell!

    "Bleep music has no DRM or copy protection built in. We believe that most people like to be treated as customers and not potential criminals'"

    Well, crap. The preachers of Kazaa and its ilk have been saying these things need to be done before they'll switch. Now lets see if they actually do.

    In all seriousness though, it'll be interesting to see if this business model can be successful. And they're a label built on electronic music, which is pretty much the first in this kind of market, genre wise. Definitely interesting to see how the first genre-themed music store will do.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Critics by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Well, crap. The preachers of Kazaa and its ilk have been saying these things need to be done before they'll switch. Now lets see if they actually do.

      Well I certainly know what I'll be browsing when I'm back home at my boradband connection after work. :)
      Not yet sure if there's any music there I'd want, but now I've a legit way of finding out.
      And it would appear to be fine with UK payments. Bonus!

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  92. Others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks really cool and once the site is responsive again I will probably buy a few tunes. A few other people mentioned magnatune which also seems really cool. Anybody else have any other suggestions?

    --Greg

  93. obLameJoke by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

    don't you know that Drukgs are bad, mmmmkay?

    --
    Free as in mason.
    1. Re:obLameJoke by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Drukqs
      Druk Qs
      Drukqs
      Druk Queues
      Drukqs
      Druk Yous
      Drukqs
      Drug Use
      Drukqs
      Drug Use

      Drug Use.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  94. Magnatune provide FREE mp3s by anti-NAT · · Score: 4, Informative

    for non-commercial use, and non-commercial sharing.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
    1. Re:Magnatune provide FREE mp3s by magnatune · · Score: 1
      "for non-commercial use, and non-commercial sharing."

      That's right, all the music on Magnatune is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Derivative-NonCommercial license, so non-commercial playing, sampling, reuse is explicitly allowed and encouraged.

      -john

  95. Big-ups by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Mad props to Warp, DRM is something for free files at most, you dont want to pay for a crippled file (in probably an inferior format anyway). If i had paid for a DRMd file i would be much more likely to find some tools to crack it and then share it just to spite them, with Warp i would be so happy that they had respected me i would respect them to (even though their entire collection is probably availiable on kazaa anyway).

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  96. Dear Music Industry by edo-01 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I like music. I'm sitting on a (small) pile of cash and I want to give you that hard earned cash for your product, but you just don't want to fucking take it. I will pay good money to download high quality VBR MP3s, with correct naming and ID tags so they can fit nicely into my iTunes databse. I am not interested in DRM, I've had too many computers and handhelds to be able to predict what I'll be using even a year from now, and if I pay for a song I expect to be able to fucking listen to it wherever and whenever I choose to (MPAA - same goes for goddamnned DVDs. Far as I'm concerned,- so long as I paid you your AUD$40 for a movie that comes on maybe two bucks worth of plastic and packaging - the whole world is region 0)

    I will even - and lean in close here, peckerheads - pay for stuff that I already downloaded for free just to get the aforementioned nice ID tags and bitrate quality I want, not to mention knowing the artists get their due. Yup. And seeing as I would have paid for those tracks I'm not about to go throwing them on a P2P - they're mine.

    Also, I'm not in the continental United States but last time I checked my currency converts into USD just fine but you won't take it (I'm talking to you, iTunes). So here I've been, out in the cold, clutching a fistful of dollars, my nose pressed up against the glass of Apple's spiffy new online music store unable to get in. Then along comes Bleep. Not only do they have stuff I couldn't find on iTunes (Boards Of Canada) but - get this - they will actually sell it to me. So I bought, and I'll keep on buying. I bought songs I had already downloaded for free. While looking for those songs I found more stuff I didn't even know I wanted and I bought those too. Hell, while downloading the big-ass zipfile I went back, had another look and now I have TWO big-ass zipfiles to download.

    So in closing let me sum up: treat P2P like what it really is - free advertising and marketing info - embrace it then make the damned music available to buy at high quality and DRM free. Do you really think the success of iTunes is because it has DRM?? Do you know what would happen to sales if the tracks on iTunes suddenly went DRM free? Sales would remain constant, and would even pick up as the word got out to ornery pricks like me who just won't touch anything with DRM in it.

    But you won't do any of it and Apple and other non-luddites will eat your lunch.

    Bite my balls Dinosaurs,

    Angry of Sydney

    1. Re:Dear Music Industry by alecto · · Score: 1
      I will even - and lean in close here, peckerheads - pay for stuff that I already downloaded for free just to get the aforementioned nice ID tags and bitrate quality I want, not to mention knowing the artists get their due.

      A-f*cking-men!

    2. Re:Dear Music Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one of the most beautiful posts I've ever read!

    3. Re:Dear Music Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Angry of Sydney,

      You are a niche, insignificant market. Stop wasting our time.

      Yours,

      The Music Industry

    4. Re:Dear Music Industry by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      I know you were giving a flippant comment, but you've managed to highlight the crux of the whole DRM issue...

      You are a niche, insignificant market. Stop wasting our time.

      The Music industry in general treat the niche markets as "insignificant", and fob us off with DRM and/or platform-locked audio formats.
      But they over look that a lot of said "niche markets" include the geeks who have the skills and time to find a way around it. And by not giving these people what many would probably pay for, they're giving them a reason to put their skills to use.

      Yes, maybe the non-mainstream music and non-Windows/Mac markets are small. Maybe they wouldn't make a huge amount of profit from them. But by catering to those markets they'd decrease the amount of people coding ways to allow them to play music they way they want to.

      It's good to see that Warp (and others) are finally getting the picture.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  97. Not a criminal?!? by Hallowed · · Score: 1

    What is up with that, it isn't the American way!

    --

    1. When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.

    2. Do not eat iPod shuffle.

  98. honestly by Vertice123 · · Score: 1

    I was wearing sunglasses when i checked out their website. i had just gotten to the office and was loading up slashdot in between getting my coffee iv prepped. i offer that their fonts are icky though =)

    --
    Morals.. isn't that some fancy kind of mushroom
  99. The track in Blade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was UT1-dot. Classic track, with some lyrics that I think every /. reader would like.

    "Introducing integrated inside with electronic techno music,
    controlled manual by Aphex mind program...
    Acid might kill the population."

  100. Re:Boards of Canada: Music Has The Right To Childr by Enoch+Root · · Score: 1

    But when I got to the Warp website, the price was $10. No way. Vinyl cost $5 when I was growing up, and there's no good reason music should cost any more than that now.

    I guess you slept in class the day your highschool Economics teacher explained 'inflation'.

  101. But it's still small. by Jesse9 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Don't get me long, I love Warp. I dig Aphex Twin, and Autechre just rocks my world. BUT Warp is a relatively small label when compared to the big guys out there. Sure, I'll trust Warp and gladly fork over the cash for the music, but if Warner Brothers was doing the exact same thing, would we still be so quick to sing praise? Everytime a major label does anything we raise eyebrows and wonder what deviant scheme the bastards have come up with. IMHO Bleep is great, but it's still just one label out of hundreds, of which only a few really matter to the masses -- and those few are still charging around $15 for a CD.

  102. Re:Mp3? Bleh by 741763 · · Score: 1

    anyone who has their UID equal to their username deserves to be modded down like the piece of garbage that they are! oh wait...

  103. except Bleep can be used anywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From the FAQ:

    Q: I AM IN SOUTH AMERICA/ALASKA/THE NORTH POLE, DOES THAT MATTER?
    A: As long as you have an internet connection and a fairly modern browser (Internet Explorer 6, Safari 1.0, Firebird 0.7) you can access and use Bleep.com anywhere in the world, whether using an Apple Mac or a Windows based PC. Lots of bandwidth and a fast connection obviously helps too

  104. Fax Records are even more forward looking by JazFresh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Recently I bought a compilation of Pete Namlook's "Silence" series of albums. I didn't realise till I popped the disc in the drive to rip it to MP3 that it was a data-only disc containing 224Kbps MP3s of the tracks!

    I wish all the CDs I bought were like that.

    1. Re:Fax Records are even more forward looking by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      While browsing Hot Topic (ugh, I know) I noticed quite a few Punk new music CD's that contain nothing but mp3 files. No clue as to what the quality is, but they fit about 300 mp3s onto a sampler for $8. Now THAT'S a good fucking deal.

  105. Re:USA only... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bleep doesn't. Follow the link in the OP and check out their FAQ.

    Q: I AM IN SOUTH AMERICA/ALASKA/THE NORTH POLE, DOES THAT MATTER?
    A: As long as you have an internet connection and a fairly modern browser (Internet Explorer 6, Safari 1.0, Firebird 0.7) you can access and use Bleep.com anywhere in the world, whether using an Apple Mac or a Windows based PC. Lots of bandwidth and a fast connection obviously helps too!

    I've not tried it out myself yet, but I'm guessing the web-based nature means that it will also work under any OS with an up-to-date browser.

    Tiggs
    --
    Tiggs
    "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  106. One word: by ballpoint · · Score: 1

    Recommended.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  107. Attached picture in mp3? by six809 · · Score: 1
    $ id3info 01_come_to_daddy__pappy_mix.mp3

    *** Tag information for 01_come_to_daddy__pappy_mix.mp3
    [...]
    === APIC (Attached picture): ()[, 3]: image/jpg, 13870 bytes
    Hmm, attached picture? How does one get this out? MPlayer doesn't seem to recognise it...
    1. Re:Attached picture in mp3? by juuri · · Score: 1

      Album art.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
  108. Index of Digital Music sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems there are many services now offering the download of digital music. Is there an index site which lists them all, and gives ratings on stuff like DRM, file quality, price etc?

  109. Broken transfers by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your review. It was most informative.

    Downloads did not remain in any way accessible after the initial post-purchase links were accessed, so you had better hope the download doesn't get broken or lost.

    It's trivial for them to only "remove" a download after the HTTP connection is properly closed (or after three days, or something like that). I would guess that they do this. There's little way that this could be used against them, and there's clear benefits). At around a dollar per five megs or so, bandwidth is an awfully small cost. ServerCove sells bandwidth at $89 for 700GB/mo, or 12 cents a gigabyte, to get a rough benchmark. That's about a twentieth of a cent per MP3 in bandwidth. They could probably sequeeze in quite a few retransfers before they need to worry about losing money, given that this is less than a tenth of a percent of their profits.

    * I'd like to see ogg vorbis support. Given that this is all automated, I don't see any reason that files couldn't be easily provided in Vorbis format.

    --Quality encoding, even if it is VBR.

    This confuses me. VBR is consistently more space efficient given the quality you get. Why on earth would you see VBR as a negative?

    1. Re:Broken transfers by MunchMunch · · Score: 1
      "--Quality encoding, even if it is VBR. This confuses me. VBR is consistently more space efficient given the quality you get. Why on earth would you see VBR as a negative?"

      Yeah, this comment caused some confusion with another guy, and I posted my explanation in a different reply here. This was an opinion formed from a test I did awhile back, and it was old enough that by now it is more an intuitive than scientific belief.

      Still, it seems like in any lossy VBR compression scheme, such errors are bound to occur. I mean, you see this more observably in video compression, where VBR often introduces artifacting during scene changes. A song also has aural "scene changes," and thus a VBR control mechanism is only as good as its psychoacoustic model's prediction, analyzation and reverse-prediction (which is to say, not perfect). That's the general criticism. However, yeah, I may in fact not know what I'm talking about with the current specific LAME versions. =)

    2. Re:Broken transfers by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I don't know about VBR, but I remember that at one point (perhaps a year ago, maybe more?), I was trying LAME's ABR feature, and in the particular copy that I had built, there were *definitely* artifacts being introduced. It wasn't a function of low bit rate.

      That has since been fixed.

      Currently, I far prefer VBR to anything else. The problem is that CBR currently provides a simple metric that can be seen in encoded files -- "What bitrate do you use?" I don't believe LAME embeds what quality level it uses in VBR files, so it's hard for folks to say "These are LAME quality level 4 VBR MP3s".

      I got interested in blind testing of various bitrates of vorbis and mp3 at one point. I found that VBR made a significant difference with the music I was listening to -- I could reduce bitrate by something like 30% from the indistinguishable-from-uncompressed-audio CBR mp3s and get indistinguishable-from-uncompressed-audio VBR mp3s. I've found that a major factor in the general audio superiority of vorbis and other new formats is that they are *guaranteed* to be VBR. VBR MP3s are not that far off from vorbis quality (though I find the artifacts to be more disruptive).

      If you're using 320 and don't care about space, then there really *isn't* any point in VBR. However, if size is an issue, VBR really is a no-brainer. Aside from certain situations involving streaming to devices with tiny buffers, there's no reason to use CBR.

  110. Nope... by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In many cases, the criminals are better off than the customers. Of course, in these cases the criminals are also known as "executives"

  111. Huge difference missed by jdifool · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the Bleep website : After the bandwidth charges and Bleep running costs are subtracted, the artist gets half of the album or track price.

    I guess that artists are more than happy with such a system.
    Want to know how much iTunes gives ?

    --
    Let's overcome our weakness.
  112. magnatune.com rocks by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, I just went there for the first time. Now, their artist selection is small. Probably too small to go anywhere. However, from a technical standpoint, they are *spot* on. Besides offering music in the format folks want, they even provide a free Internet radio station that you can listen to. If you hear something that you like, you can zip over to their web site and buy it. That's a damned intelligent system.

    If I were them, I'd put out a patch for Shoutcast/Icecast in xmms and talk to the Nullsoft folks about doing the same for WinAMP to stream a "buy it" (or at least "for more information on this song") link along with each song. When a song's getting streamed, the user can just click to bring up a page in their web browser to let them buy the song (or album containing the song, or whatnot). That'd make it ideal for folks who want to sell these things. I think you'd see a lot more try-before-you-buy Internet radio stations.

    1. Re:magnatune.com rocks by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Okay, I just went there for the first time. Now, their artist selection is small.

      Thankfully they have many of the artists I care about if they've got all of Warp. For a number of people that'll be quite enough - that is, it isn't a broad selection, but Warp means they would have a very very good selection for a niche audience. Next best thing - almost better in some ways.

      Jedidiah.

    2. Re:magnatune.com rocks by rsborg · · Score: 1
      If I were them, I'd put out a patch for Shoutcast/Icecast in xmms and talk to the Nullsoft folks about doing the same for WinAMP to stream a "buy it" (or at least "for more information on this song") link along with each song.

      Damn, wish I had mod points this wee, that's a good idea. Nullsoft, are you listening? Can you do this instead of that winamp3 bullshit? THAT is where the money's at.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:magnatune.com rocks by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I think we're talking about two different online music stores. Someone mentioned magnatune.com, and so I took a look. This is different from Bleep, which is the online music store selling Warp.

    4. Re:magnatune.com rocks by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There is an exploit for MP3s that can force connection to a website embedded in the MP3 itself. (Somewhere I have a sample exploit file -- my old Netscape/WinAmp setup was immune, but I guess it can get WMP/IE setups.) Maybe this could be tuned to be on-demand for the user?? I don't remember enough about how it works to say anything more intelligent about it.

      Anyway, ISTM to accomplish what you're talking about, WinAmp would just need to make the ID3tag's Info field (where links to artist websites sometimes go) into a clickable link as seen by the OS, so the user would not be annoyed by it, but it would always be handy with each and every MP3, even if saved for offline use.

      Lots of simple programs already so something similar, so I'd guess from a coding standpoint this isn't rocket science.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:magnatune.com rocks by magnatune · · Score: 1
      "If I were them, I'd put out a patch for Shoutcast/Icecast in xmms and talk to the Nullsoft folks about doing the same for WinAMP to stream a "buy it" (or at least "for more information on this song") link along with each song. "

      In the ID3v2 standard, there are meta tags available for this, such as defining the web site for this artist.

      Yesterday, I re-ID3ed all the MP3s at Magnatune, so that they all have these extended ID3v2 tags. I'm told that some players (winamp v2/v3 doesn, buy maybe v5 does) display this info.

      -john

  113. A good first step but... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would prefer that non-Americans were treated as potential customers too. Otherwise, especially with rare stuff, they might have to remain reluctant criminals.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:A good first step but... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      Obviously another person who hasn't visited Bleep/Warp's site and read their FAQ.

      As I stated in another reply earlier, not only do they seem to be a UK-based outfit, but they openly state they'll sell to any country as long as you have net access and a compatible browser.

      (The prices being listed in GBP if you're in the UK should be a bit of a giveaway - now if only other sites would also aotumatically adjust the currency their prices are displayed in depending on locaiton accessed-from)

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    2. Re:A good first step but... by dubstop · · Score: 1

      So, why are they ripping off the British buyers, then? According to this, they're charging 0.99UKP per song, when they should be charging 0.74UKP. That's a 25% markup. What's the explanation for a UK company charging substantially more in their home market, than they're charging elsewhere?

    3. Re:A good first step but... by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      I visited Bleep around five seconds after I saw the headline on the /. index, and five minutes later I had Autechre's EP7 on my iPod, and I'm smack in the middle of England. So go forth and support! Yo ucan pay with the usual Visa / Switch options, or Paypal. The downloads are made available straight after payment, individually or as one zip file. The album came down work's pipe in under a minute. Excellent service, excellent music.

    4. Re:A good first step but... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      OK. From their own website's FAQ:

      From the USA (and anywhere else in the World) they will be displayed in US$, and the prices do not include any sales taxes so are considerably lower than their Sterling or Euro equivalent

      Plus until someone from outside UK/Europe comments, I have no idea whether Sales Tax gets added, increasing the actual price of the shown amount.
      Much as I hate VAT, at least it's included in the pulished price. I know that, at least back in 1989, in some parts of the US the sales tax wasn't shown in the marked price, so you ended up paying more than the stickered price. Maybe things've changed now.

      Yes, I know their website's not exactly well-designed, but it's not that hard to find the information.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    5. Re:A good first step but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, New York still had the untaxed prices displayed everywhere when I was there last year.

    6. Re:A good first step but... by dubstop · · Score: 1

      Yup, you've got me on that one. I should have read the FAQ. I guess that does make it comparitively good value for here in the UK.

      I've never liked the way that the sales tax gets added at the counter, over in the states. I figured that the shops did it to make things look cheaper, but I find it annoying.

      On the subject of legal music downloads here in the UK, does anybody have any info about the HMV download site? What sort of formats it provides, choice of music, that sort of thing. It seems like it could be good value, but I can't get it to work with Konqueror, so I'll have to wait until I get home to have a look around.

    7. Re:A good first step but... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      New York still had the untaxed prices displayed everywhere when I was there last year

      It's as bad as the computer shops here in the UK.
      They proudly display rather reasonable looking prices in HUGE BLACK TYPE, putting the VAT-inclusive price in very small type underneath.

      That's fine for business customers. But when the adverts in consumer-targetted magazines advertises like that, they don't exactly get me on side, ya?

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  114. Re:Mp3? Bleh by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Beta was technically superior to VHS, being a scaled-down verion of the broadcast-quality U-Matic system. Beta also had the feature that the cassette tape was "laced" the first press of the PLAY button and stayed so until the press of the EJECT button -- meaning that, as long as you had already hit play, you could go from fast wind to picture search {of course, you could fast wind "inside the cassette" if you went straight into that mode from insertion}. Unlike VHS which laced the tape on every press of play and unlaced it on stop -- so fast winding was always done with an unlaced tape. {Modern VHS recorders accomplish the lacing procedure much quicker so this is not an issue}.

    Beta also had better resolution, and a recorder whose heads were in good condition could actually record the Teletext signal {transmitted while the electron beam is out of the visible screen area}. However, I don't recall this "accidental feature" being exploited on any movie cassettes; shame, because it would have allowed for {not quite DVD-style} special features such as subtitles and additional {textual and low-res graphics} material to be embedded in store-bought or rented movies. Of course if someone has an example of a prerecorded Beta cassette with teletext, I'd be delighted to be proved wrong.

    Unfortunately for Sony, Beta relied on more moving parts than VHS. Most of the TV/VCR rental companies chose VHS for its mechanical simplicity, despite the poorer picture resolution. Japanese-manufactured units {actually built by sewing-machine maker Elna, I think} were badged with the names used by the rental companies, and also sold under the Ferguson brand -- I used to have an old Ferguson 3V22, with "piano keys" and an Audio Dub mode for adding new sound to an existing recording. Follow-up models featured touch buttons and stereo audio {achieved by splitting the tiny edge track!}; but, since the internal TV receiver only decoded the mono FM audio {not all transmitters were broadcasting NICAM till the early 1990s}, and the UHF remodulator only encoded FM mono, this was effectively redundant.

    Of course, I haven't even mentioned the wonderful Philips V2000 system. This featured 8-hour , turn-over cassettes and fully automatic tracking, but there were only two manufacturers {Philips and Grundig -- Pye was already dead by then} and the machines just cost far too much, features notwithstanding.

    Moral: Being good at your job won't necessarily make you popular.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  115. Re:Nobody!? NOBODY!!??? by Bertie · · Score: 1

    They were in my class at Uni before they dropped out, y'know. Oh, yeah, what a class it was - Boards of Canada, Ian "Freenet" Clarke, and me!

    (If you look through my previous posts and see me mention Keith out of the Office being in my class too, don't go thinking I'm a silly troll - I did joint honours and he was in my other class)

  116. Re:Mp3? Bleh by ajs318 · · Score: 1
    If people are willing to pay a premium for the bandwidth cost they incur, then even 24bit versions of files could be sold.
    That would be fine in theory, except the human ear can't hear the difference with anything better than about 18 bits. And how many hi-fis have a signal-to-noise ratio better than 144.5dB anyway? Come to think of it, how many mixing desks have that SNR? 24 bits is equivalent to a resolution of one centimetre in a hundred miles. So who's going to buy it?

    Probably the same people who buy speakers labelled "3000W", feed them from amplifiers labelled "200W" that draw about 20 watts from the mains, and think they have a 6kW stereo {conveniently forgetting that 230V * 13A = 3kW, so a real 6kW amp could never work from a standard 13A power point -- we're talking those big fat round blue plugs here}. Or maybe the ones who use expensive oxygen free copper cables and gold-plated plugs -- the latest thing apparently is "directional" cables which are reckoned to sound better when the {alternating, in case anyone forgets} current is flowing from one end to the other.

    In short, there's a limit to how hi your fi before you start wasting effort
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  117. It's not only not USA only.. by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Warp is UK based.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  118. More labels to come by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Warp is promising to bring all the labels they currently offer in Warpmart to Bleep. That's got to be at least fifty labels.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  119. This is the normal Warp model by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Their contracts always give 50% of the profits to the artist. Consdiering they have next to no advertising and promotion budget, this is a very good deal.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  120. Re:Mp3? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah and you don't have those 18bits on a CD, so why not if your hi-fi set up to this resolution ;-)

  121. What about O.G.G.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's good that these folks are providing standard mp3 files instead of wacky formats like WMA or AAC, but what about O.G.G.?

    Come on dudes, now that iPod is about to jump on board don't get left behind!

    1. Re:What about O.G.G.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use mpg123 to convert mp3 to wav and output it by STDOUT, and you can encode wav from STDIN into ogg. Nuff said.

    2. Re:What about O.G.G.? by sharph · · Score: 1

      What about M.P.3. or F.L.A.C.?

  122. Warp Records is Warped by ITR81 · · Score: 1
    Why the hell would I buy a $1.35 track over a DRM protected track for $.99???

    And what for a couple of bands??

    Why not just buy the damn CD or buy it USED!

    Oh yeah those are over priced too!

  123. And now, the rest of the story by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    We believe that most people like to be treated as customers and not potential criminals...

    We know the 13 of you who purchased music from our catalog in the past will appreciate this and we hope to double our customer base by the end of the year.

    1. Re:And now, the rest of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have a fucking clue do you?

      Now head back to your Garth Brooks and Shania fucking Twain and give the rest of us some peace.

    2. Re:And now, the rest of the story by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Now head back to your Garth Brooks and Shania fucking Twain and give the rest of us some peace.

      Wow, one of the 13 responds! It brings a song to mind..."Man, I feel like a coward..."

      The strength of your convictions is totally eliminated by your choice to post anonymously.

    3. Re:And now, the rest of the story by bleepbleep · · Score: 1

      we sold a quarter of a million records in the usa in our first year with a US office.

    4. Re:And now, the rest of the story by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      we sold a quarter of a million records in the usa in our first year with a US office.

      Well good on you. And just think how much higher your sales would have been if you were selling CDs!

  124. Funny AND true, but system still bad by Morgaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe potential criminals should be treated like customers too.

    While your line sounds funny, it's actually true, since a potential criminal is not a criminal, ie. innocent until proven guilty.

    However, while the label deserves credit for not blindly following the myopic behaviour of the big labels and not supporting the police-state behaviour of the RIAA, the system they operate is at heart still wrong. Artists have no business passing ownership of their work to a third party for all eternity, as this just feeds that greed machine and is the real root of all this evil.

    There once was a need for placing oneself into perpetual slavery in some circumstances, but that no longer holds in these days of inexpensive small-batch pressing and easy online presence and distribution. Studios and labels nowadays need be no more than technical and promotional subcontractors, not feudal barons squeezing their serfs dry as in previous decades.

    The arithmetic of musical serfdom is just plain scary.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:Funny AND true, but system still bad by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Informative
      actually, releasing artists' music DRM-free would probably help the artists out more than it would hurt them.

      previously, in order to get your material out to the public, you had to set yourself up as an indentured servant. if, at any time, you didn't want to play ball with the record company anymore, you dropped out of print and vanished from public eye.

      getting the public to get used to downloading music from "official" record company and artist sites and music services means that if an artist ever decides to give their label the finger, all the public needs is a quick check on their search engine of choice to find out where they are now and continue getting their music from them.

      word of mouth is one of the most powerful tools in the music industry and word spreads pretty fast online.

    2. Re:Funny AND true, but system still bad by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, that's precisely what gets me to buy music:

      1) download MP3 with interesting title
      2) decide I kinda like it
      3) decide I want to hear more
      4) download everything I can find by same artist
      5) put them all in my playlist and get addicted
      6) buy every album I can find by said artist

      Interspersed with "tell my friends about it, who then go do the exact same thing".

      This is exactly how it went when I was DJ'ing where I could tape any album I wished, too. Tapes and MP3s are okay for everyday use, but for archival purposes, I want the real thing.

      OTOH, when I have no good way to freely sample AND become addicted to someone's music (there being no radio to speak of here, and steaming on dialup is not realistic) ... I don't BUY any music, either.

      Note: short clips have never once addicted me to an artist. In fact, I find they're more annoying than useful.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  125. But the important questions is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you still be able to see the pretty pictures in the music?

  126. No Pulp???? by alecbrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's strange, I some of the early Pulp L.P's were on Warp Records, but I can't find them on this site. They were the rare classics that I couldn't afford when I was really into them at Sheffield Uni in the early 90's.

    As one of the most famous bands to have recorded for Warp, it is a bit surprising that they don't sell Pulp. Come on Warp, sort it out, I'm ready to buy.

    1. Re:No Pulp???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's strange, I [thought that] some of the early Pulp L.P's were on Warp Records...

      Sorry, I think you're mistaken. I'm assuming you're looking for pre-"His n' Hers" stuff, and if so "Freaks", "It", etc. are readily available for order - I've even seen "Freaks" at Best Buy. Check ab-cd.com if you can't find them.

      As far as I can tell, most of this stuff was released by Fire records (who's final Pulp release was the highly-recommended compilation "Countdown" if you don't already have that).

  127. Result! by nicky_d · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, I just signed up and downloaded EP7 by Autechre. Very cheap (as a full album purchase), very fast, certainly good enough quality for me and my iPod. I'll be using this service a lot and I hope they really clean up.

    For information, payment is either standard cards or Paypal, and after purchase your tracks are made available for a standard browser-based download, either individually or in a zip file. Transfer is very fast (depending on your own connection, natch.)

    There are a few oddities with prices - Sabres of Paradise's Wilmot EP is 2.99 complete, which is 1 more than the two tracks bought individually. There are also a lot of small tracks (such as the 'bolts' on Black Dog's Spanners album) that cost 99p for 20 seconds or so. But those kind of tracks you'd only really want as part of the full album, where the average price per track would be far less...

    However, given that the selection of tracks and albums is very comprehensive, a few glitches are to be expected, and are easily worked around.

    I urge anyone who's interested in online music and hasn't heard of Warp to give the site a try - all the files are available as previews (with fade-outs) and you'll find some wonderful stuff there. Warp's an electronica label, but a very eclectic one. If you don't get on with Aphex Twin, try Mira Calix. If you can't gel with Autechre, check out Sabres of Paradise. If Boards of Canada don't blow your kilt up, listen to The Gentle People. All unique, all worthwhile, all available.

    Audiophiles note (because the 'what-no-Ogg' crowd are already in effect, I see) that the FAQ states that Warp are considering offering other codecs, including FLAC, and maybe offering higher bitrates for a higher price. Early days, though - the first thing they need is support. And here's someone who really, truly deserves it for a change.

  128. So What Are You Waiting For? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    Put your money where your mouth is.

  129. Warp Rules by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    It's worth knowing that Warp was instrumental in kicking off the resurgence of techno during the early nineties. They were responsible for massively popular underground bleep tracks such as "Tricky Disco" and the poltergeist of a track "Test Four" and it's derivatives. Back then, these boys supplied extremely high quality minimal techno. I owe a large portion of my thanks to Warp for inspiring my love for high art minimal tech.

    - IP

  130. Hmm. by mcc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Magnatune is a social experiment of sorts which may or may not have good music. I don't know. However, the fact I don't know whether they have any good music does say something.

    Warp Records, meanwhile, was for quite awhile the most important and progressive group in electronic music, and while I haven't been paying enough attention as of late to know if they still hold this label, I know for certain they continue to push the boundaries of the art.

    Perhaps they are not "first" at this particular thing, but they have been offering significant amounts of downloads as samples of parts of their albums for years.

    And if you do want to get into a pissing contest of which label "got it" first, my nomination would be Astralwerks. They had, in like 1995 or some shit, I don't even remember, back around the time Dig Your Own Hole was released, before MPEG Layer III even *EXISTED* and when MPEG Layer II was a format almost no one used, realaudio offerings of absolutely huge swaths of their catalog. For most of their releases about that time, you could listen to about half the album without buying it. They also ran a web newsletter letting people know when they'd put up more music, and they'd periodically do one day events where you could listen streaming to entire albums on the day they were released. This was essentially my introduction to electronic music, and I seriously think it helped them-- it led to me buying a decent amount of Astralwerks stuff even though I had to do a decent amount of searching for it at the time...

    1. Re:Hmm. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Three words: Bentley Rythym Ace.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Hmm. by sdcharle · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree, who's first really doesn't matter to me, I'm just happy to be able to get the old 'Artificial Intelligence' comp to replace my old cassette tape of it. I haven't seen it in record stores lately.

    3. Re:Hmm. by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      I seem to recall that in 1997 or so, Sister Machine Gun released every song from every one of his (their?) albums on their website in CD quality Real Audio format. I remember thinking that this wasn't terribly bright, but in the days before MP3 became a household name and CD burners were slow and expensive I thought "I guess no one really wants to listen to music on their PC's".

      They didn't stay there for long.

    4. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words: Bentley Rythym Ace. [sic]

      Word! Bentley's gonna sort you out!

  131. Re:Mp3? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like to add that the current limitations on 24 bit DACs are around 120dB SNR. The brownian motion of air molecyles sets a boundary of 100dB SNR of mics. Most listening rooms have a noise floor of 30-40dB, while the really good ones have around a 25dB floor. The lower boundary is usually set by ones own breath. The top SPL have been measured at around 130dB for drums.

    So do wee need more that an CDs dynamic range? Hell yes. But as a delivery medium, 24 bits is overkill. As a recording and mixing medium, it's barely enough. 18-20 bits will do nicely.

    But do we need the extra bandwith from these HQ formats? Do we need 96kHz and beyond? No, why the hell would we? the threshold for human hearing is above 140dB at 20KHz for pristine ears. Even higher for someone who has acutally lived...
    The sampling theorem dictates that 40KHz is enough . At some extra to get a headroom. Then fix it at a spesific location for historical reason (that seems to be the only reason, this time due to 44.1KHz master tape format). makeing it a fiendlier size might not hurt (at least make it even), but no need to make it 96KHz. We have no problems designing steep analog filters.

  132. Re:Potential criminals respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're welcome.

    --Richard Schmuck

  133. Crappy track names by shermozle · · Score: 1

    Why do these sites always name their tracks so badly? What's wrong with -/..mp3? Instead I get bleep/wap102/01.mp3 -- fucking useful that. At 6.99 an album, I don't expect to have to fix up the filenames like I do with pirated music just so I can know what it's called!

    1. Re:Crappy track names by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      Not always. Things are still misnamed. Either totally, or with spelling errors. And even in the ID3 Tags. And the latter means that with Tag-based tools you have to edit the tags before it can rename the files.
      At least Warp give full properly-formatted ID3 tags, meaning most renamers can deal with the files all in one go.

      Besides, they're new to it, and doing something that few other record companies seem willing to do.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    2. Re:Crappy track names by tbien · · Score: 1

      They have good ID3 Tags... I had no problems using iTunes.

  134. I am so happy I'm going to cry, or something. by mcc · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt anyone cares much for my opinion, but in my opinion this is the coolest news I have had in quite awhile. I love the iTunes music store, but the one deficiency it's had in my mind all along-- though I was very pleased when they started carrying Matador and such-- is that they never carried Warp. They haven't even been carrying the albums that are distributed in the states via Nothing.

    So I'm just overjoyed about this. I'm going to go home tonight and buy copies of Feed Me Wierd Things by Squarepusher and Amber by Autechre (my current favorite band, more or less), I think...

    Now, does anyone know when we will be able to get similar deals from Shematic and whatever the name is of that label the guy from Pole runs? ;)

  135. Warp Records and Magnatune by hjw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Without getting into a comparison between their music ( being a subjective matter I'm sure most of you would rather we not waste each others time on that argument ), I think it should be pointed out that warp and magnatunes have significant differences.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but magnatune is a record label created around an internet business model. From day one it's goal has been to create a successful online music label.

    Warp Records is an existing and highly successful independent music label that has chosen to embrace an honourable approach to online music sales. This is very significant the the differences between warp and magnatunes on this are very important. They could have very easily submitted their catalogue to an existing online music service, and complied with their restrictive terms and technologies. Instead they have chosen to implement their own system ( using lame encoder is a serious bonus for me ) that does not have pointless drm etc.

    Warp Records has been an active an innovative label for about a decade. They were the first record label that I purchased music from directly on the internet ( around 1996/7 iirc ) and today I have just downloaded a rare AFX EP that I have been trying to get hold of for years.

    Europe has a vibrant independent music culture and I hope that warp become an example to the entire scene. I wish them the best of luck with it, and I hope others follow in their footsteps.

    --
    -- hjw http://puzl.info/
  136. It's amazing! by ndnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Between this and a couple of other companies mentioned in posts, it sounds like a couple of companies have learned something:

    Customer service is the difference between low piracy at a reasonable price and high piracy at any price.

    You can acquire music anywhere. You can easy use P2P or copy a friend's CD - the latter has good value as a promotional tool.

    But when you treat someone as though they are already a criminal - that they need to protect their music from activities that the end user typically considers legal - the value of music at any price drops. No one can argue that iTunes is unsucessful, but they have a tricky balance - enough DRM to protect against illegal use while allowing quite a bit of fair use. Sadly, this will not last forever. A new tool will come out, or record companies will change terms, or something. Enjoy it while it lasts.

    I now respect Warp Records. I'm a sucker for customer respect (part of why I'm satisfied with working at Wal-mart while I'm in college - because they too show genuine concern, at least at 2597 (my store)). I don't even think I had heard of them, but now I'll check out their site. Maybe buy a tune or two.

  137. Can I download it onto record? by JBMcB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed they only carry Warp's catalog in MP3 form, although the Warp Mart online CD/vinyl service also carries SKAM, Rephlex, and many others. Too bad, I was hoping to pick up the tracks that weren't on the Caustic Window compilation due to copyright or some other nonsense.

    It will be interesting to see if they release the unreleased Aphex stuff, like Analog Bubblebath 5, or Melodies from Mars, both of which I have on mp3, but poor quality. I would most definatly buy high quality VBR versions.

    I own most of the Warp catalog in analog, record form. I think the tracks sound harsh and thin on CD. Autechre's albums in particular, sound nice, full and meaty on vinyl, come out with messy treble and anemic bass on digital. I belive one of Autechre's releases even says "Incomplete without record pops and clicks."

    I most definatly WILL use the service to download the rare albums I don't own. Hangable Auto Bulb is almost impossible to find in the states, and the second version is even more rare.

    I wonder if they would sell T-shirts digitally? Still looking for an AFX one :)

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Can I download it onto record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go read the FAQ on the site - they will attempt to get the other labels on board ASAP.

      Analog Bubblebath 5 was released.

      Your whining sounds harsh and thin

    2. Re:Can I download it onto record? by hime · · Score: 1

      Analog Bubblebath 5 was released.

      Be sure to tell that guy that bought it in that eBay auction a year or two ago. And the guy who sold it. I think it went for over 4 digits.

      That, "Melodies from Mars" and the IG-88 (Grant's record) are the 3 Aphex rarities. Well, and if you believe in the sandpaper thing, those.

  138. Spend some money! by hazee · · Score: 1

    Well, for all the people who have been griping about DRM, here's the chance to send a powerful message to those who insist on using it.

    I've never heard of most of Warp's artists, and don't much care for the ones that I have heard. Nevertheless, I shall be buying a bunch of tracks on principle.

    The only language the people at the RIAA and similar organisations understand is money. Here's a golden opportunity to spell out to them that the community will reward those that treat them fairly. If we collectively shovel a ton of money at Warp (which only requires a small contribution from each of us), then it'll be a powerful wake-up call.

    Or are we going to prove to the DRM-pushers that there's no profit in being "fair" and that they were right all along?

    1. Re:Spend some money! by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      I've never heard of most of Warp's artists, and don't much care for the ones that I have heard. Nevertheless, I shall be buying a bunch of tracks on principle.

      And that always runs with the chance of you finding another artist you hadn't heard of but actually rather like. And at that point, another potential customer is born.

      I echo the sentiment that Warp actually seem to have picked up the clue here. Some people will still be put off by the prices (you can't please everyone), but others will gladly pay for less than a standard CD for the MP3s which they can then back up, copy to their other PCs, and play on damn near anything.

      They also seem to have picked up that they'll probably never totally stamp out people copying music, but they can at least use the internet and the MP3 file format to make a few more sales.

      The only language the people at the RIAA and similar organisations understand is money. Here's a golden opportunity to spell out to them that the community will reward those that treat them fairly.

      I'm all for the record companies making money out of me if it's money for something I actually want. And I certainly intend to put my money where my mouth is and buy from Warp/Bleep.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  139. Re:Mp3? Bleh by MrBlint · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that one of the most important components of any HiFi system is the human brain. I suspect that this is the only component that is actually affected by higher sample rates and sizes, oxygen free cables and wotnot.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  140. Wow LFO by Chitlenz · · Score: 1

    When I was a LOT younger than I am now, I used to work for Sound Warehouse in the vinyl section. To this day, I still mix to relax in the afternoons after work (apparently most people seem to get jittery at 140bpm... not me, heh). LFO was one of the pioneers of the rave scene in the early 90s. Seriously great music, really took me back to even go through their catalog and see some of the old rare stuff that I'd spend all day looking for as a kid. Oh my god, Baby Ford =) I still remember Chilren of the Revolution when it first came out, really cool really powerful track. I remember we got a promo vinyl of it for the store and listened to it at insane volumes after close.

    These things are priceless, HIGHLY recommended site. Notable for all the shit it doesn't have, like popups or annoying flash navigation bars.

    Wow, good call by Warp to do this =)

    -chitlenz

    --
    Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
  141. Buying Music by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    Give me a decent quality mp3 or other format with NO DRM for $.10-$.50 each and I will spend $10-$30 per month on music. Offer me this crap with DRM and I will spend zero.

    1. Re:Buying Music by radish · · Score: 1

      RTFA. There is no DRM. That's the whole point.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Buying Music by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

      It was a statement, not a comment about this service. Settle down.

  142. Re:What to download... Boards of Canada / Geogaddi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boards of Canada / Geogaddi
    one of the better electronic albums of the last few years.
    listen to samples at amazon if there's none
    at warp (their website was clearly not prepared
    for this onslaught from reg and slashdot users)

  143. Mmmmmm. Warp! by jovlinger · · Score: 1

    Nightmares on Wax ...
    (only one so far, but NoW kick serious ass)

    Now, if Morr music were to do this, I would have _no_ money left.

  144. Why not? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If IBM. Novell and other can be on the good side, why not one of the big recording labels?

    They just need the cojones, they would find many friends and would be pleasently surprised.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  145. Warp Records? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

    For a second, I thought I was reading about Slashdot in the future or about a bad Startrek reference.

  146. Good point about classical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a *ton* of classical stuff that isn't available; the market isn't big enough. And there is a back catalog of classical music recorded in analog that is performed by legendary artists and conductors.

    Classical music fans would freak out if they could download high-quality stuff from the 30's through the present.

    These folks will pay money for this stuff, too.

    I think the record companies are missing out *big time* with their approach. They could be twice as profitable with less expense if they made their back catalog available for download.

  147. The clue is spreading! by argent · · Score: 1

    There is already Fictionwise and Baen Books, where I have bought oodles of DRM-free e-books, and now pepole in the music industry are joining in.

    Bravo! The clue is spreading!

  148. still want to know how much iTunes gives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because your URL doesn't say, ya moron, it's just a whiny .gif with no information

  149. Why is this informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm happy to listen to MP3s on my shitty MP3 player and shitty headphones, thanks"

    isn't the point of new technology to be an advance? Maybe you'd be happy with wax cyliders? I mean, hell, you just need a steel needle, no electricity.

    People aren't complaining about lossy compression per se; they're complaining about it replacing *what you admit* is higher fidelity in a CD for about the same price. Remember, a lot of us rip our CD's to MP3's, CD's don't lock you out of any options.

    Why should we pay more for *inarguably* less?

  150. Repeat after me.. by caveat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even though we, the technological cognoscenti, consider any form of DRM to be an encroachment on our rights and furthermore a "broken" product, we need to realize that non-independent music will NEVER EVER be legally released to the wild in a totally unencumbered form. Never.

    Indie music will be and often already is freely purchasable, but anything from the major labels will simply have to include some form of DRM. You..oops, 'we'...bitch about iTunes as a "good idea but totally unacceptable [because of DRM]"; did you not listen to what Steve said about the copy protection, that without it, there would be virtually no large-label music for sale online? That the RIAA et al. will simply not allow 'free' mp3s to be sold? Dystopian perhaps, but reality for the time being.

    I do understand the arguments against DRM, and I would LOVE high-quality unencumbered mp3s, but at least for the forseeable future, you/we're simply going to have to compromise a bit. (If you have any interest in owning major-label music, that is.) Hell, maybe even SUPPORT iTMS - would you rather have that DRM scheme, which is arguably the best middle ground, or WMA's total-lockdown?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Repeat after me.. by double_h · · Score: 1

      I do understand the arguments against DRM, and I would LOVE high-quality unencumbered mp3s, but at least for the forseeable future, you/we're simply going to have to compromise a bit. (If you have any interest in owning major-label music, that is.)

      My personal compromise is to find a used copy of the CD (so the RIAA doesn't see any of the money, and because it's good to recycle) and rip it to mp3 myself.

  151. artists??? by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

    Featuring artists such as who, who and who???

    1. Re:artists??? by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      Well, if you've not heard of them yet, try the track preview function.

      I'd never heard of Black Dog before, but I bought one of their EPs alognside some Aphex Twin last night.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  152. cool by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
    It's nice to see a business that trusts it's customers to do the right thing.

    BTW, anybody got torrent links to these files? $1.35 a song my ass!

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  153. whining cunt by Craevenwulfe · · Score: 1

    What a suprise. Someone throws their hands up to make an excuse as to why they don't want to pay for music. Pay for it or don't pay for it. Quit with the long fucking sob story about how you're "not in the target audience". I saw this exact same retarded crap on the thread about mini-ipod's. Slashdot: News for Nerds and Economics failures.

  154. Re: Emusic by Lagged2Death · · Score: 1
    Yes, Emusic has pretty much been emasculated by new management. I was a subscriber for three months in the fall of last year, just before the new policies took hold.

    The incredibly useful message boards were actually canned altogether, at least for a while, and the file download limits were reduced to such a degree (only 2 or 3 album's worth per month) as to make the system far less attractive than illegal alternatives. And the balky download manager, which had been required for some time, has, AFAIK, not been improved.

    However, they were offering pretty good 192KBps VBR files for most of their catalog for most of last year. They had a lot of recent stuff by independent pop artists and a lot of older jazz and classical material. I downloaded perhaps 40 albums, and still listen to many of them regularly.

    To be fair, the Emusic users who were banned for too much traffic were downloading truly insane amounts of music - like 100+ tracks per day for an entire month. Yes, Emusic should have deliniated clear limits in the EULA, but most people have a little more common sense - how is a US$15 per month subscription going to pay record-label royalties (which averaged seven cents per track, as I recall) for two thousand or more tracks? (2000 x US$0.07 = US$140) Obviously, it can't. Of course Emusic had a problem with that.

  155. A few minor problems... by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 1

    It appears that the layout does not work properly with firebird (0.7 at least). I can scroll through the artists, but not the releases... the panel extends past the window border.

    Another thing is that I think they need to work out some of their pricing: you can purchase all 3 tracks from the Anti-Pop Consortium's Ghostlawn EP individually for 3*$1.35=$4.05... or buy the whole release at once for $4.29. All in all though, it's a great idea. It seems they are taking after Mille Plateaux who released a large portion of their catalog on eMusic.

    --
    "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
  156. A whole record label... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    ...just for musicians who use OS/2 version 3?

  157. "Rare" Items? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Wouldn't those "rare" offerings only be rare if hardly anyone purchased them and they failed to make backups of their server?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  158. Re:Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this "we" stuff? You act like a criminal, therefore we all act like criminals?

  159. more recommendations by slithytove · · Score: 1

    Good recs-
    Here are a few of my own:

    Plaid:
    everything by plaid and black dog (members shared) is great, but IMHO "double figure" is best

    Luke Vibert (wagon christ) - Yoseph

    Nightmares on Wax: a little more trip-hoppy than IDM-y - excellent- particularly carboot soul

    Boards of Canada: truly their own sound (melodic, trippy, uplifting) Its hard to say which of their albums or EPs is best- get em all

    and of course check out Autechre, Aphex(also polygon window) Twin and Squarepusher

    and if you run out of good stuff on warp (good luck)- some of my other fav artists: B. Fleischmann, Freescha, Casino vs Japan, Solvent, Matmos, and Tortoise

  160. If you can find the cd, that's a great idea by caveat · · Score: 1

    i do the same thing myself, actually. unfortunately, i can't always find the album i want, and in that case i'm willing to make a compromise with the powers that be. itms is to me more inconvenient than restrictive, so i can live with it, ymmv.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  161. Re:Boards of Canada: Music Has The Right To Childr by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

    What makes you think that?

    Back when I was growing up, in the mid-70's, records were hugely expensive to make. Popular bands were huge, and the prominent ones took months in the (incredibly expensive) studio to produce records. Band members, hangers-on, pharmacological and handgun needs had to be taken care of. Session artists made tons of money bringing their expertise to the studio. Famous artists earned lots of money making lavish album convers that folded out to two or three panels. Full-size glossy album inserts including lyrics, art, photos and the like were common. The records themselves were produced by a complicated physical process that had a much higher failure rate than today's pressings. And you could go down to your local record store and get it for $5.

    Boards of Canada is two guys in their apartment and a few computers. Their label wants $10 to download a few files from them.

    --
    Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
  162. Not the entire back catalog. by defstro · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm glad they finally launched this baby but some of the songs I wanted the most aren't on there (Sweet Exorcist: Test Tone 1-3, Wooden Spoon "Souf Souf"). Hopefully it's just a matter of time before the complete back catalog is up.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space..."
  163. Hmmm. Proxy users screwed? by valkraider · · Score: 1

    Besides the layout being horribly screwed up, I get this message in every "column":
    --
    UNKNOWN IP ADDRESS
    You appear to be visiting the site via a Proxy server. Please revisit without the proxy server so we can determine your location.

    support@bleep.com

    --
    Guess I won't be buying anything from them any time soon...

  164. Re:Mp3? Bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother responding to that git. Trying to explain to the unwashed about the benefits of Ogg Vorbis over MP3 is like trying to tell a caveman the difference between a blender and a food processor.

  165. License? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so they provide MP3's without DRM. What license do they provide when you make a purchase? MagnatuneCreative Commons

  166. Re:Dear Music Industry (from the Industry) by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

    Dear Angry of Sydney,

    Wow! I'm really glad that I logged in to Slashdot this morning -- if I hadn't, I might have missed your touching letter!

    Well, I'm afraid that's all the time I have for today -- got to go scour the web for more customer reactions! Best to leave no stone unturned, you know! And this way we save so much money by not having to have a mailbox!

    Very Truly Yours,

    The Music Industry

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  167. Unlikely... by Canar · · Score: 1

    Rephlex is a completely seperate entity. Thus, unless the Rephlex artists decide to ditch Rephlex for Warp, chances are it won't happen.

  168. Re:Mp3? Bleh by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to start any trouble here but... Have you ever used Ogg or looked at the codec and/or source? It is superior and compresses better while retaining the same quality as mp3. The developers are extremely intelligent and ogg is being used in many places because of its benefits. EA Games used ogg in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, ogg was used in Soul Rever 2, and in Unreal Tournament 2003. Many developers are starting to realize that it is superior. Linux is arguably superior to windows (and please no comments on GUIs) and Microsoft hired thousands of people to develop that. Just because its free doesnt mean its bad, that is a common misconception. Microsoft can hire whoever they want but they can't compete with brilliant minds across the globe collaborating to produce something better for free. Microsoft uses a ton of free source code for various things and government agencies, like the NSA, have shown that Linux and BSD are more secure and reliable. It's fairly simple to prove that Ogg is of superior quality when you put the codecs side by side.Its one thing to argue about someone's opinion on whether or not something sounds better, but you can't argue anything when comparing codecs. Its clear which is the best, and it just also happens to be free.
    Regards,
    Steve

    Listen for yourself
    Or heres the documentation proving it.

  169. Can anyone hear previews with linux 2.6 by figa · · Score: 1

    I'm running Firebird .7, Flash 6.0 r79, kernel 2.6, alsa-base .9.8-3, and debian testing. Sound is going through esd .2.29. I get garbled sound.

  170. Re:Boards of Canada: Music Has The Right To Childr by radish · · Score: 1

    Can you say INFLATION??

    Take a look at the Inflation Calculator. It only goes as far forward as 2002, but $5 in 1975 is equivalent to $17.54 in 2002, it will be even more than that now. So the cost of the music has actually almost halved. Stop whining that things aren't free and either pay up or shut up.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  171. On Kazaa yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said.

  172. Re:Trust the Computer! The Computer is your friend by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Is that the new term for "mutant commie traitors"?

    Well, I thought it was funny.
    Too bad you got mod-robbed.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  173. Welcome to slashdotting.... by valkraider · · Score: 1

    Got this reply from their (quick!) support: -- This should have been fixed so you can access the site. We made changes this morning in response to feedback such as yours. Have you tried it today. If so, please can you tell me what specific problems occured ? If you couldn't access the site at all, then I think it may have been because we were absolutley over run with traffic today. New hardware going in tomorrow should mean we can cope better with the demand. Hope this is helpful,

  174. Is it related to Bleem!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I check, Bleem was sued to extinction. Will this music service goes the way of the ill-fated emulator?

  175. Nice nice by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    I've got the Hangable Autobulb EP on vinyl. I have never seen another copy, forget where I got it (probably Grammaphone in chicago). This is one of the best Aphex records IMO. Glad to see warp is being nice about the Mp3s and DRM stuff. Most of the Warp artists are looney and probably are not into music for the fame or money, so they probably don't mind to much that their work isn't digitally 'protected'. It would have been simple to just add their catalog to the iTunes music store, but then they would be making WAY less per download (probably).

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  176. Proposed ID3 tag extension by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Aside from Shoutcast/Icecast streaming purchase data links, it might also be a good idea to have an ID3 tag (as well as the Ogg equivalent) containing a purchase link. This would make it easy for online music providers to put out low-fi music files with "buy it" links to pages to let folks buy the music.

    Furthermore, if this approach is taken, online music providers could even use P2P networks to distribute their low-fi samples. :-) No Internet radio bandwidth costs, and you still let folks try-before-they-buy.

    1. Re:Proposed ID3 tag extension by pod · · Score: 1

      The ID3v2.4 specification has tags for just such information.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    2. Re:Proposed ID3 tag extension by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Thanks. So all that's necessary is for media player software to support it nicely, eh?

  177. Cool. by Rocinante · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is cool, and definitely a step in the right direction. But for $9.99 I can buy a used copy of most any album, and get full quality sound and the cover art package (which is important to me, although my tastes aren't primarily in electronic music, which seems to often have pretty sparse packaging). If they were selling MP3/ogg singles for, say, 50 cents or less, I would probably buy a bunch as a replacement for things like Kazaa, which are mostly try-before-you-buy mechanisms for me. Still, way to go Warp.

    Now, when Relapse Records gets on board with this, I'll be all over it. Those old 7" splits are fucking hard to find.

    --
    Just trying to open someone's head! I mean "mind!" Open someone's mind, um, to the possibilities! With explosives!
  178. BROADCAST RULES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just gotta throw in the plug for one of my favorite artists (favorite ever, not just on Warp). BROADCAST! "The Noise Made By People" is flat-out brilliant and one of the best albums of 2000 easy. If you're into Stereolab, film music, French pop, or melodic and organic electronica you should definitely check them out. Their latest, "Haha Sound," is good as well and one of NME's top 50 of 2003.

  179. Oh, I see ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    so 'Intelligent dance music' is neither dance nor intelligent. Is this music?

    1. Re:Oh, I see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, yes?

      Are you saying that just because something isn't danceable, it isn't music?

  180. Re:Mp3? Bleh by ColMustard · · Score: 1

    Have you ever heard ogg comapred to mp3 at the same bitrate?

    Why, yes as a matter of fact. But if you'll kindly reread my post you will realize that I wasn't bashing ogg vorbis from a technical stand-point. Everything I said was true apart from my obvious underestimation of the vorbis community size: ogg vorbis isn't the standard.

    --
    Moof.
  181. TDR are GENIUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    i'm sorry but this is actually a VERY well designed page. check warprecords.com for more examples of TDR's genius

  182. Glitches by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Artist: Aphex Twin
    Track: Bit
    Price: $1.35
    Length: 6 seconds

    Oops! $810 per hour LOL!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Glitches by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      Yok! Though Aphex is probably delighted with that. This is an interesting problem, though - the flat fee works well for a lot of electronica, as tracks can often be very lengthy. But they can also be extremely short - you know, not usually THIS short, but still... Warp could charge according to time, but they'd have a hard time arriving at a fair price due to the extreme variations in length.

      Personally, I've bought several albums from Warp, and that works out very cheap. I've bought a few single tracks, but clearly you'd have to be quite eccentric to fork out over a dollar for six seconds. Good cause, though.

      I can't use the iTunes store yet, but I notice on there they have a number of long jazz tracks that maintain the 99c price - heading into the 20/30 minute mark on occasion. It's nice to see the prices for these left static - I'd have expected them to be raised. Tragic cynicysm, really...

    2. Re:Glitches by Alsee · · Score: 1

      It's a cool genre. I put together a pisser theme CD with techno versions of Seseame's Treat, Scooby Doo, Wild E Coyote, Mickey Mouse March, Speed Racer, Oompa Loompas, Inspector Gadget, Pink Panther, Powerpuff girls, Ghost Busters, Simpsons Doh song, Smurfs, Happy birthday, and four Southpark songs. Chuckle.

      I am tempted to buy some Warp stuff - the album price is nearly right. The singles prices are even worse than the RIAA services though, blech.

      About my comment that album prices are "nearly right" - there was a slashdot story a while ago about a company hand burning and selling physical CD's by mail for $4.95, shipping and handling included. (They advertized it as "free" plus $4.95 S&H chuckle.) They gave $1 of that to the artist and still made money. Selling downloads is clearly a cheaper operation than hand burning and mailing physical disks. If Warp can get the price just a little lower then it becomes a very attractive deal. I realize one of the major issues is processing "micropayments". They should set up something like $20 for X downloads.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  183. Re:Trust the Computer! The Computer is your friend by Alsee · · Score: 1

    You misspelled "commie mutant traitors".

    P.S.
    Parent post was mis-modded as flamebait. It was a genuine geek-humor refference.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  184. hangable auto bulb rocks!!! by GirTheRobot · · Score: 1

    best experienced slightly left of sober.

  185. I love it... by tbien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok I just spend 100 Euros on the store...

    LFO
    Boards of Canada
    GAK
    F.U.S.E.
    Aphex Twin
    Jimi Tenor

    It's great, for my part - I love it!

  186. Re:Boards of Canada: Music Has The Right To Childr by tbien · · Score: 1

    That should answer his complains...

  187. mute by sharph · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mute, another UK based electronica record label, is doing this. It wasn't there whole selection, just "net-realeases."

    I actually tried to submit it as a story a few months ago, but whatever.

  188. They robbed me by sdcharle · · Score: 1

    I too was using Mozilla and paid with Paypal, but it disappeared into a white blank page while 'zipping'. Afterwards there was no record of my order. At first I liked the idea, but the bastards robbed me. Itunes has never stiffed me like that.

  189. Update: they redeemed themselves by sdcharle · · Score: 1

    Support contacted me and helped me out. I was able to download all my tracks eventually, but the 'zipped order' approach didn't work for anything, so I had to download things individually. A good idea, but the user experience aspect of it has a way to go yet. But they did make an effort and did not stiff me. I'm sure Wal-Mart would have told me to get fucked.

  190. Re:Mp3? Bleh by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    Agreed. However, I have to say "Ogg" sounds like something a caveman MIGHT actually have in his vocabulary. ;p

  191. The preview tracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The preview tracks are actually a reasonable quality to just listen to, and are freely downloadable.

    They are all in this format:

    http://bleep.warprecords.com/player.php?key=XXXXXX XX

    where XXXXXXXX is a code representing the song to be played. This key can be discerned from the album code and track number as follows:

    wget -O - "http://www.warprecords.com/bleep/current_item.php ?selection=WAPXX_DM&audio=WAPXX_DM-NN" | findstr "key="

    .. then search the output for key=XXXXXXXX and put it into the original URL.

    For example, doing the above procedure on "WAP108_DM-02" (Track 2 of Red Snapper's The Sleepless single) results in a key of gESddI6u. This can then be loaded into your favourite URL-based mp3 player as http://bleep.warprecords.com/player.php?key=gESddI 6u . It's only mono 90kbps or so, but that's good enough for a preview.

  192. support seems to be lacking.. by smcavoy · · Score: 1

    I purchased 4 albums from them in two orders.
    1 order I downloaded after the huge rush without issue.

    But the one I downloaded during the rush had problems.
    out of 30 or so tracks, I could only download 5.
    Support got back to 24hrs later (understandable, as I'm in EST, their in GMT), they said I should be able to download it all now. No such luck...
    Here I am 4 days later and I'm still missing waiting to get the rest of the music I paid for.

    When it worked it worked great, but when there was problems it seems they weren't entirely prepared.
    I'd even settle for a automated response stating their dealing with a high volume of issues or whatever, instead nothing but silence.

  193. Re:Mp3? Bleh by Frnknstn · · Score: 1

    And don't forget it was used in Microsoft-published Halo for PC.

    --
    If it's in you sig, it's in your post.