Slashdot Mirror


RFID Tags For The Rich

Greedo writes "While reading this piece about designing 'experiences' in the Globe and Mail, I came across this interesting tidbit: If you're a frequent Prada shopper (and who on /. isn't?), the loyalty card in your wallet or purse contains a RFID tag that announces your arrival in the store. When you encounter a saleswoman, her handheld computer brings up your tastes, buying history, vital statistics and personalized suggestions from in-stock and coming inventory; the handhelds also place orders and book change rooms. Every item for sale bears an RFID tag. The RFID tags are courtesy of IDEO, and their website has a nice write-up of all the RFID-powered stuff at Prada, including the changeroom! I'm guessing this isn't coming to Wal*Mart's changerooms when they implement RFID. (Another write-up can be found here.)"

399 comments

  1. Big Bottom FP by Yellow_Piss_Hat · · Score: 0, Funny

    The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin'
    That's what I said
    The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand
    Or so I have read

    My baby fits me like a flesh tuxedo
    I'd like to sink her with my pink torpedo

    Big bottom, big bottom
    Talk about bum cakes, my girl's got 'em
    Big bottom drive me out of my mind
    How could I leave this behind?

    I met her on Monday, twas my lucky bun day
    You know what I mean
    I love her each weekday, each velvety cheek day
    You know what I mean

    My love gun's loaded and she's in my sights
    Big game is waiting there inside her tights, yeah

    Big bottom, big bottom
    Talk about mud flaps, my girl's got 'em
    Big bottom drive me out of my mind
    How could I leave this behind?

    --


    --------
    Elmond, 45, delivers boxes to old women in Seattle.
    1. Re:Big Bottom FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      There's a fine line between clever and stupid.

      There's no line at all between stupid and SCO.

  2. Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So what would it take to create a small device to send out random RDIF signals (a 'white noise' generator)?

    1. Re:Messing with thier system by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Or...just have a reader...'capture' the person's personal RFID number...and then, transmit that number for yourself or someone else....

      Would be fun to see tons of snooty sales people running up to a guy dressed like a bum...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A handful of random RFID tags?

    3. Re:Messing with thier system by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, read and clone someone else's RFID. (Secretly while passing by, of course.) I wonder if their greeters and clerks would even notice that you didn't exactly match the data on their display, or just go through the sript?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Messing with thier system by gouldtj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw that, I want to get someone rich's RFID - so that way they'll treat me like royalty when I walk in! That would be way cool. I don't want to block it, I want to use it for personal gain!

    5. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      salesperson(1): Are you sure that's Tom Cruise?
      salesperson(2): The tags say he is. salesperson(1): They say the camera puts on 10 pounds...the camera they use on him must add 100 and have an unemployed bum filter

    6. Re:Messing with thier system by skink1100 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've worked with several RFID implementations, and all of the (silicon-based) solutions have decent encryption to prevent "capture" of IDs or other data. Usually a shared-key system -- not unbreakable, of course, but pretty difficult to intercept on the sly.

      S

    7. Re:Messing with thier system by vida · · Score: 1

      What you say is actually pretty interesting. Imagine the connotations now, taking into consideration that I am sure most of these people have charge accounts at these places.

      so it would be:

      1) find RFID tag of one of these guys.

      2) create duplicate

      3) go buy tons of nice stuff w/ their money

      4) resell at the local flee market for PROFIT! or,

      4a) Start dressing in style and get laid more

      Facun.

    8. Re:Messing with thier system by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most systems will ignore RFID tags from outside a certain range. I work with a race timing company and we use a RFID timing system (ChampionChip). We constantly get bogus reads from other chip sources. The software that transfers the chip IDs to the timing software ignores any chips that aren't valid Champion Chips.

    9. Re:Messing with thier system by Atryn · · Score: 1

      And if I just steal their 'loyalty card'?

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    10. Re:Messing with thier system by BeerVarmint · · Score: 1

      Just curious, with a proximity device, like RFID, how do you determine EXACTLY when people cross the finish line? (I assume that being exact is important in your market)

    11. Re:Messing with thier system by spacey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So other questions are:

      What's the key management? If one of the reader units are removed from the sture, how hard is it to use it to get a valid key that can read all other prada rfid tags?

      How hard is it to break into the readers that the store's using? Can you have to floor people direct people to randong items?

      If the tags themselves are hard to game, can someone game the rest of the system?

      -Peter

      --
      == Just my opinion(s)
    12. Re:Messing with thier system by Xoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do not need to decrypt a signal that you can repeat. i.e. I can say "Bonjour" without knowing a lick of French, or even the literal meaning of that phrase.

      Now, if there was some kind of challenge-response going on, it would be much harder to deal with, although not impossible, given enough "captures".

      --
      The previous sig has been removed due to /. protecting your best interests
    13. Re:Messing with thier system by beebware · · Score: 1

      RFID readers either side of the finish line probably: when the RFID "reads" closest to the "over the line" reader then the "start of the line" reader then deem the tag as being at least half-way over (ok, some variation can be accounted for height about the line - but tags either side of the line should eliminate this to a very very very small margin).

    14. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Triangulation, I would think.

    15. Re:Messing with thier system by stephenb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just be careful who you steal it from. If you happen to get Winona Ryder's ID, the treatment you get is not quite the same. You walk in and all of the sudden the security gaurds pay you more attention than the sales people. :)

    16. Re:Messing with thier system by BeerVarmint · · Score: 1
      Technically, the shark with the frickin' laser on its head would be slightly more accurate...

      Seems almost like RFID just for RFID's sake...

      Thanks for the reply, it's a good thought.

    17. Re:Messing with thier system by rworne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That you may do. But imagine what the world would be like when this becomes more commonplace.

      Imagine going to a designer store to buy a nice handbag or whatnot for your better half when you are tagged head to toe with WalMart and JC Penny tags.

      Imagine trying to get help in such a store. It's hard enough getting help from the clerks if you don't appear to fit the "profile", but rich people sometimes dress like slobs too. Determining which is which is a simple matter of "loyalty cards", credit accounts, and sharing of customer info between stores.

      RFID will confirm to the staff you are not their type of "customer". They only attention you will attract is store security.

      Better yet, there are many jewelry shops with automatic doors that are locked and released by the staff after they look over the customer. Imagine this spreading to other kinds of shops now that RFID tags can be used. Wouldn't it be grand to be denied entrance based on what you wear and what cards you carry (and possibly the cash) in your wallet rather than just appearance?

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    18. Re:Messing with thier system by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 3, Informative
      The ChampionChip system is based upon a passive chip, which has some pros/cons over an active chip.

      The system is composed of a few elements. The Readers which have large mats attached to them. The mats have a series of loops in them. One loop 'charges' the chip the other 'recieves' the chip.

      The mats constantly send out a 'charge' signal to the chips which then send back their ID for the reader. This is happening at a very high frequently, for champion chip the time is rated to the .01 of a second.

      The other major component is the Ear. The purpose of the Ear is to syncronize all the mats. This makes sure that all the 'charge' and 'recieve' cycles and in sync. Otherwise you would have chip reads happening out of sync.

      As for the 'photo-finish' aspect of a race you still need to rely upon a photo for high speed events since it is possible that both athletes could register the same time to the .01 of a second.

      For high density races we place a system (System Photo) right at the finish line. This system is usually 8M wide by 4M deep. Then a back-up a few meters beyond. The systems can be linked to form larger read areas. If you have ever been to a marathon you will know what I am talking about.

      If the system is working correctly we can dedect a chip as high has 60CM off the ground. If we have strong EMI then the reads are a bit lower.

      To avoid multiple reads we set a time to ignore for the system. Usually 10 seconds. So once we read a chip we won't read it again for 10 seconds. This can be an issue with a mass start since people may be walking over the mats and end up on the same mat for a few seconds.

    19. Re:Messing with thier system by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, the shark with the frickin' laser on its head would be slightly more accurate...

      When you have dozens of people crossing the line in any given second like you do in many large road races where they use these chips, it is much more accurate than you could get with a laser, because people will often cross the line before the previous finisher is completely over the line, making line of sight based techniques hard to use, it is also a very easy method of associating a number (and therefor a person) with each finisher, and the order they finished in.

      You would never use one of these in a track event where hundreths of a second count and there are few enough compeditors that you can "just watch" for the order...

      TamMan2000 - Marathoner, Triathlete, wearer of many championchips

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    20. Re:Messing with thier system by BeerVarmint · · Score: 1

      True enough. It certainly would be a convenience for record-keeping in mass events.

    21. Re:Messing with thier system by DonGar · · Score: 1

      IF this is really strong encryption, and is well done, it could help to prevent a lot of the misuses of RFIDs. It doesn't stop them, of course, but makes them harder.

      If the tags in my clothes will only talk in a useful way to authorized readers, then you can't just put a generic reader in the lamp post and discover everyone that walks by.

      However, all that is needed to get the lampost reader to track people is to have the keys, or have some way to get the RFID to talk in a consistant way. For example, always send it the same challenge and see if you get the same response. Hum... the encryption systems probably don't prevent that.

      Some sort of salting would be needed in the reply. Current time/request counter, something.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    22. Re:Messing with thier system by Ummagumma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      4a) Start dressing in style and get laid more

      Ummm, I don't think ANY amount of fine clothes will help most /.ers to get laid....

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    23. Re:Messing with thier system by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      News flash, most people who have enough money to shop at Prada on a regular basis are not like wannabe middle-class 20-somethings that dress flashy with logos blinging like mad.

      I work for a luxury department store and the people that spend the most wear labels you've probably never heard of. They also dress more conservatively (i.e. like bums) when they shop because they are not out to impress sales staff.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    24. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont buy there. Go Ebay.
      Better selection, and lower prices.

    25. Re:Messing with thier system by Serious+Simon · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've worked with several RFID implementations, and all of the (silicon-based) solutions have decent encryption to prevent "capture" of IDs or other data.

      Bullshit.

      Proximity cards based on ISO14443 have encryption, but very limited reading range due to the larger power consumption of the chip. Popular types of vicinity (up to about 1 m reading range) cards such as I*Code, Tag-it, ISO 15693 use no encryption at all. I designed low-level firmware for a reader to read these, so I should know...

    26. Re:Messing with thier system by deacon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Imagine trying to get help in such a store. It's hard enough getting help from the clerks if you don't appear to fit the "profile", but rich people sometimes dress like slobs too.

      I've accidently discovered the secret to getting service while dressed like a slob.. (And I wouldn't call myself rich)

      Basically, be an arrogant yet superficially polite jerk. This includes:

      Appear to be bored

      Poke gently at the merchandise (as though it might be soiled), while making little sniffs and raising one eyebrow in amused disgust

      Make little "tch tch" noises, and sigh occasionaly.

      Hold the merchandise at arms length, tip head back slightly, furrow your brows, squint a little and peer at it as though it was a dead badger.

      Talk in a loud tone of voice

      Aproach the salespeople directly, at high speed, and say "Can you help me please" in a firm and loud tone of voice"

      Say "Do you have anything a little nicer than this"

      Say "Mmm, this isn't quite, is it."

      The end result of all this, in my amazed and incredulous experience, is that I am mistaken for someone incredibly important, while all I am doing is acting self-important.

      I think the salespeople in these places respond positivly to contempt and arrogance, and despise timidity, humility, and any indication that the customer is in awe of their surroundings.

    27. Re:Messing with thier system by hamsterboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you listening to yourself? You write as though the object of Prada opening a store is to keep lowlifes out of it.

      Prada is in business to make money. If they're smart (and they seem to be), they'll do what's best for business. This includes profiling customers to focus attention on steady high rollers. But if a salesperson sees you in Levi's and Hanes, but their handheld tells them that you bought two handbags and a set of luggage last month, I don't think you'll be spurned.

      Prada does not make money by kicking non-disruptive people out of stores. Let's look at this like what it is; an attempt to improve service, as well as get good publicity.

      -- Hamster

    28. Re:Messing with thier system by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I can say "Bonjour" without knowing a lick of French, or even the literal meaning of that phrase.

      Bad analogy, sort of, eh. If you speak a native language, you can tell aboot from where a speaker originates. Some interlopers can fake it for a little while, but further ecoutage always betrays them. Unless they are really good spies.

    29. Re:Messing with thier system by rworne · · Score: 1

      I do not doubt in any way that this is an attempt to improve service.

      What if I'm a first time customer?
      What if I try-to opt-out of RFID tags?

      What if I like anonymity combined with a peaceful, non-disruptive shopping experience?

      What happens when Equifax or some other company opens up a customer profiling database?

      That last part is the scary one. Double-edged sword this one is.

      I couldn't care less if Prada wants to show me what I look good in. Having my entire purchase history and everyday habits to the most minute detail up for bid is what scares the piss out of me. If RFID is commonplace or mandatory, someone will build it.

      I need insurance. My insurance company checks up on whether I smoke or not, what I eat, and how often I buy condoms by checking a database.

      I go to a Lexus or BMW dealer. As I walk in the door, a screen on every salesman's PDA notifies them that I bought 2 cars in the last 10 years, one was a Civic the other a Corolla. What kind of service would I get?

      I would also bet that the IRS and state tax collecting agencies would love this data treasure trove too. Now everyone can be audited every year!

      I'm pretty sure employers and law enforcement would love this too.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    30. Re:Messing with thier system by EverDense · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bad analogy, sort of, eh. If you speak a native language, you can tell aboot from where a speaker originates.

      You're Canadian?

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    31. Re:Messing with thier system by instarx · · Score: 1

      I can't undertand why everyone seems fixated on RFID only being a problem in commercial settings. The real problem is the potential for government spying and intrusion. Ubiquitous RFID tags in clothing and credit cards are a right-wing government's wet dream.

      Scenario 1) Homeland Security identifies "suspects" and surreptitiously scans the RFID tags in their clothes and credit cards. (Remember, its only Prada for now - soon RFID tags will be everywhere.) The government can then track all these people by simply placing automatic scanners on city streets. Our "suspect" will never be able to go anywhere without being tracked again because new tags are automatically associated with his old tags by the government database. In other words, in the government database your Prada credit card associates your Eddie Bauer shirt which associates your Adidas shoes, which ....

      Scenario 2) Homeland Security detects other tags on persons walking with the suspects. They are then tagged as "known associates" and tracked as well. Whenever known associates meet - voila,, a conspiracy.

      Scenario 3) Homeland Security places a scanner at a political rally and knows immediately who attended. They may not know all the names at first, but a quick check of the Homeland Security RFID database or the Eddie Bauer or Prada or Sears RFiD databases (subpeonaed earlier for "national security" reasons) identifies a good portion. Plus if you attended you are now a "known associate" of all those rabble-rousers, communists, and terrorist sympathizers.

      Given the self-infecting nature of the RFID tags it wouldn't be difficult for the government to identify and track every man, woman and child in the country within a year or so.

      Think you can outwit the system by carefully eliminating your tags or by jamming the signals? Nope - when everyone has tags the act of being WITHOUT tags will be suspicious in itself.

      Airports are the perfect place to start this government tracking system - you have to identify yourself, there are lots of tags in your luggage, and in airports almost anything is allowed the government in the name of security.

    32. Re:Messing with thier system by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      You're Canadian?

      I'd go so far as to say eastern Canadian, but I wouldn't bet much more than lunch money on him being a maritimer.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    33. Re:Messing with thier system by mainframemouse · · Score: 1

      Like most people here, I do not dress like the average Joe. From personal experience I've been followed by shop security and treated in a condesending manor by staff, just for the way I look. Prada want to make money, Prada staff like to think they are part of the social elite.

    34. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haven`t you heard? that`s what "666" does. knowone can buy, sell, without the mark, the name of the beast, or his number... revelation,13:16-17
      if you don`t believe that`s your choice but when "666" become a reality it`ll be hard if your not strong enough to refuse the mark. those who refuse, go to prison and/or get killed. fun huh? but if you do take the mark you don`t go to heaven. so their you go think what you want time proves all things.....

    35. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You write as though the object of Prada opening a store is to keep lowlifes out of it.

      Isn't it? You're right, Prada is out to make money. They don't make particularly durable gear, and I don't remember hearing about any weatherproof Prada stuff or the like. People buy Prada both because they can afford it and perhaps also because they like the look of the clothes. I guaranfuckingtee you that Prada gets as much business from people who're buying the name as there are people who are buying for the look/design of the clothes. For this reason, Prada can charge much more money for their kit. Instead of the free market working to create a balance of prices, Prada is betting on higher prices getting them _more_ dollars because they have so many people who'll buy Prada because it's Prada.

    36. Re:Messing with thier system by markhb · · Score: 1
      What if I try-to opt-out of RFID tags?

      What if I like anonymity combined with a peaceful, non-disruptive shopping experience?


      Then you probably didn't bother getting a Prada affinity card, did you?
      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    37. Re:Messing with thier system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the white-noise generator idea. This is so funny. I have a friend who is really into Prada (I onced admired her shoes, and she said "wanna try 'em on, they're Prada) - Prada this, Prada that, makes me laugh. Before you ask, no, I myself cannot afford Prada (or any other designer) - anyway, labels are for clones. I'm sure when she walks into the store, they hear her abuzzing a mile away.

    38. Re:Messing with thier system by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't bet much more than lunch money on him being a maritimer.

      I'm a transplanted Caper with Canadian Cajun roots. Good thing you didn't bet real money.

  3. Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another attempt to add the personal touch to the cold world of business.

    I'm not trying to flamebait, just make an observation. The days of going to your friendly local are over, and now the store assistants don't even need to think or recognise, they simply wrap digital information in comforting words and give you a nice smile.

    1. Re:Hmm.... by alfredw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, if Prada is letting people know about this when they accept the cards, I'd say this is a good technology. Lets them better serve YOU, the customer.

      And if you don't like the idea of carrying around RFID tags, you're welcome to not carry the ENTIRELY OPTIONAL card. And the clothes? Well, Club Monaco (a Canadian clothing chain) already puts RFID tags in all of their higher-end merchandise. Clearly labelled "Please remove after purchase," I might add, which is good advice to anyone.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    2. Re:Hmm.... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > Yet another attempt to add the personal touch to the cold world of business.

      Given the target demographic -- people who shop for status, rather than function -- this is a pretty clever idea. People who shop Prada probably do it for the ego-stroking they get from the sales staff as much as they do from the ego-stroking they get from their peers when they show off their new toy.

      I'll bet you that 90% of that target demographic actually thinks their salesdrone actually remembers them. Your typical vapid trophy wife is one thing, but think of all the trophy wives' grandmothers who also have to shop for status.

      "No, Antoine wouldn't be just reciting lines from a script being displayed to him from the cash register based on the RFID data from the loyalty card in my pocket, and stop talking in acronyms, you silly geek! He knew it was me, he even remembered my name and what I bought two years ago! My God, I must be so attractive to have made an impression on him like that!"

    3. Re:Hmm.... by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's just another way for these already high profit margin businesses to further increase their profits.

      The whole point of a very wealthy person going to these very expensive boutiques (other than paying $500 for a $20 item with a fancy name on it) is the personal touch. These places tend to have salesmen who know you by sight and can instantly tell what your interests are, how many kids you have, whatever. Often, they will be able to remember the conversation you were having last time you were in 6 months ago, and continue that conversation as if it was just yesterday.

      That sort of thing takes talent, and a great memory. People that can do this are highly sought after in the retail world. If their skills are replaced by a simple chip that tells the associate everything about you, then the stores can get by with hiring minimum wage McDonalds rejects instead, thereby decreasing their total labor costs. It will also cheapen the whole experience.

    4. Re:Hmm.... by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The reality is that good salespeople remember customers. Good salespeople follow up. Good salespeople remember what you wanted and what was not available on you last trip. This is how good salespeople make money.

      At a good boutique, the personal touches are already there. What this device might do is allow Prada to hire substandard salespeople at cut rate wages and commisions. One would expect that service will suffer.

      If it is a world wide database,this might help them identify the jet setters. However, a stranger knowing too much might be kind of wierd.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Hmm.... by lemonylimey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The days of going to your friendly local are over, and now the store assistants don't even need to think or recognise, they simply wrap digital information in comforting words and give you a nice smile. The important point is: If you can't tell the difference between the two, why does it matter?

    6. Re:Hmm.... by son_of_asdf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If their skills are replaced by a simple chip that tells the associate everything about you, then the stores can get by with hiring minimum wage McDonalds rejects instead, thereby decreasing their total labor costs. It will also cheapen the whole experience.

      On the contrary, to even be able to function in a retail environment such as this, you have to have a certain gentility. Even if you had a client's life history in front of you to refer to, the sort of people that shop at places like Prada expect the salespeople to have a degree of breeding, taste, and poise. If you look at the makeup of the staffs of such places, or of very fine resturants, they tend to be the children of privileged families that, for one reason or another, are obliged to work for a living or are simply bored and want something to do. I spent many years as I went through college working in this area as a sommelier, and I can assure you that unless you can speak clear English, are well educated, and capable of speaking the peculiar high-context language of the upper class, the clients that frequent this sort of place and the people that run this sort of establishment would want nothing to do with you. Your average McDonalds worker would be hopeless in this case, regardless of the technological assistance give them.

      It would indeed cheapen the whole experience: It would put them out of business.

      --
      Don't Panic!
    7. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These places tend to have salesmen who know you by sight and can instantly tell what your interests are, how many kids you have, whatever. Often, they will be able to remember the conversation you were having last time you were in 6 months ago, and continue that conversation as if it was just yesterday.

      Personally, salespeople who try to "Get To Know Me" (copyright, J. Lovitz), piss me off. What kind of insecurity does one need to have to buy this kind of false adulation and how stupid does one have to be to believe it?

    8. Re:Hmm.... by phliar · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't like to have their ego stroked? So what if they're professional ego-strokers? Nothing wrong with that. (Except that it does reinforce the social stratification... the only people you ever interact with are the ones just like you.) The upscale waitress would just as out of place and "hopeless" in a McDonalds.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    9. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the ENTIRELY OPTIONAL card

      Of COURSE the cards are optional. Later, they'll be optional, but people who have a card get better prices (supermarket cards do this now). After another few yaers, people who DON'T have a card have to wait for manager approval for their sale.
      THEN the card becomes mandatory.

      But you're right- its "ENTIRELY OPTIONAL" now.

    10. Re:Hmm.... by timjdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WTF's a sommelier? JK... I dictionary.com'ed it. Wine dude. cool. I think a huge op. is for us to commonize this idea. Why let all the CRM guys shave all the fun (and false info) at the person's expense? Commonize it. Let me manage my info. Then the id card can hook up to the big computer in the sky and get REAL and ACCURATE info on who I am and what I like. Ooo, using technology to benefit people rather then the man - this just ain't right is it? I'll bet equifax, dnb, and the crm companies will be spitting bricks at anyone that tries to empower the actually subject of this whole subject - you.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    11. Re:Hmm.... by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course that's why they won't do it. If they fire someone's favourite salesperson, and she goes to Gucci, that customer is now lost to Gucci.

      However, the RFID tags will help the salesperson remember, and will help a salesperson in a different branch know what the first salesperson did. In that situation, it simply helps great salespeople give better service.

      D

    12. Re:Hmm.... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting place to computerize customer service. You'd think the last bastion of personal service would be your friendly neighborhood Beverly Hills Prada store. I suppose this helps them cater to the "do you know who I am?" customer when they're shopping at Prada in another town.

    13. Re:Hmm.... by KaLogain · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add they already do this in grocry stores and what not.

      --
      Life's a bitch, then she kills you.
    14. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, I didn't:

      Later, they'll be optional, but people who have a card get better prices ( supermarket cards do this now).

    15. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if Prada is letting people know about this when they accept the cards, I'd say this is a good technology. Lets them better serve YOU, the customer.

      The whole point is that the customer doesn't know about it, or if they do, they forget about it.

      If the customers really wanted to announce their arrival they could scan a bar-coded card in a slot by the front door.

    16. Re:Hmm.... by The+Almighty+Dave · · Score: 1

      I would find it rather disturbing to have some salesperson, that I don't know, walk up to me and refer to me by name. Even if I know why they know my name, I'd still be uncomfortable with it.

    17. Re:Hmm.... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > What kind of insecurity does one need

      Security is inversely proportional to paycheck. Except physical security, since you can hire a bodyguard.

    18. Re:Hmm.... by NerdSlayer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Given the target demographic -- people who shop for status, rather than function -- this is a pretty clever idea. People who shop Prada probably do it for the ego-stroking they get from the sales staff as much as they do from the ego-stroking they get from their peers when they show off their new toy.

      A few thoughts. I know this will be hard to get across to the general Slashdot population, but designer brands bring STYLE and QUALITY that's not found at the Gap. Certainly they cost alot of extra money, and not all of that money goes into those two things, but a lot of it does.

      Secondly, I ask you this: Which is more retarded, $500 shoes or a $500 computer case with neon lights and Plexiglass windows?

      As a follow up question, which one is more likely to get you laid?

    19. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an episode of TLC's "Faking it" where they took a beer-drinking Chicago football fan and within a month had him trained as a sommelier well enough to fool one set of diners outright, and fool another until a non-wine-related crisis (one not prepped for) occurred.

      The Prada staff might need to speak unaccented English, and have good posture, but the jargon is not complex enough to be unteachable.

    20. Re:Hmm.... by fpp · · Score: 1

      If you need designer brands to get laid, you've got problems.

    21. Re:Hmm.... by son_of_asdf · · Score: 1

      The upscale waitress would just as out of place and "hopeless" in a McDonalds.

      Out of place? Absolutely. Hopeless? Only in context of her state of mind as she tries to cope with the inanity and soul-destroying drudgerey that goes along with working at McD's. Most of the better waitresses that I have worked with could probably run an average Mc'Ds front-of house without assistance and still have time to do her taxes in between taking orders.

      --
      Don't Panic!
    22. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what woman you're after.

      If you're after the gold-diggers, the shoes will most definately help you land her. However, she'll be poking around the next morning while you're sleeping it off, because a lot of schmoes can buy $500 shoes, and she wants to know your net worth ASAP so she can dump the schmoes and move on to the next victim, I mean date.

      If you're looking to land one of them there fabled geek chicks, the case might help, but you'd better have the knowledge and skill to back up that flashiness.

    23. Re:Hmm.... by son_of_asdf · · Score: 1

      ...but the jargon is not complex enough to be unteachable.

      Sure, but being able to use said jargon competently, backed up by concrete knowledge in a wide range of situations without going off the scale on the bullshit-o-meter is not something that cannot be taught in so short a period of time, even if you are dealing with an exceptionally sophisticated subject that lives and breathes wine lore 24/7 the whole month. The subject is simply too vast, complex, and dependent upon constant practice and education.

      Most of time, the folks that you are selling wine to have only the most vague conception of the difference between a Cabernet and a Pinot Noir, and a "beer-drinking Chicago football fan" armed with a few buzzwords could BS his way through a presentation just fine. However, when someone who knows WTF they are talking about turns up, they're going to know that Mssr. BudChugger is full of shit very quickly.

      I don't know a thing about the stuff Prada sells (I haven't much use for high fashion), but I can tell you that the sort of people that would shop there can smell someone from the other side of the tracks a mile off.

      --
      Don't Panic!
    24. Re:Hmm.... by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

      I look like a whacked out bum, and when i talk to girls i tell them i do it to keep the dumb girls at bay, if they're smart enough they'll look past it. And you know what? looking like a bum and that little speach likely get me more women than the shoes would, the shoo girls would likely tire of hearing me talk after about 5 minutes and go fuck some random guy at the bar.

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    25. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The case.

    26. Re:Hmm.... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Secondly, I ask you this: Which is more retarded, $500 shoes or a $500 computer case with neon lights and Plexiglass windows?

      You're asking US? I shop at Walmart for clothes so I can afford to buy a $3000 PowerMac in the summer.

    27. Re:Hmm.... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Yet another attempt to add the personal touch to the cold world of business.

      Yep, but at the same time you will very quickly realise that you have left the card at home:

      Day 1, with Card: You walk in you get treated like royalty, being tempted with your favourite stuff, having the changing room being made available to you and even being suggested what you want.

      Day 2, your card is left at home: You walk in and nobody is there to greet you, you feel that the staff is being over pompus as if you don't have something they have. And you are made to follow the the queue like everyone else.

      In a store with good service, a good customer is known by the store staff, because they recognise the person by what they look like and you know that you have built up human contact with real people. In a store with electronic (aka artificial) person recognition, the staff probably wouldn't take time to get to know the customer, because the electronic devices 'know' the person, but in reality no one knows anybody. I am being synical, but I believe that electronics should not replace human relationships.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    28. Re:Hmm.... by shdragon · · Score: 1

      As a follow up question, which one is more likely to get you laid?

      Which reminds me of the old pick up line "Nice shoes, wanna fuck?"

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    29. Re:Hmm.... by deacon · · Score: 1
      Just a nit about your post.. Since I once had a SO who worked in a snooty store...

      The sales people DO remember their most frequent customers, and the customers are trained by the salesperson to deal only with that salesperson..

      There is an *enormous* commision paid to the salespeople on every sale at these kind of stores, and the old-timer salespeople are VERY territorial about "their" customers.

      The salespeople have little black books they carry around with "their" customers home phone #, and they will call customers at home

      "Dahhhling, I just got in the most Di-Vine little outfit that would look *fab* on you!, I've just put it aside for you, and it's just your size!"

    30. Re:Hmm.... by deacon · · Score: 1
      You are talking about "Old Money", and for that catagory everything you say is true.

      In the USA, however, "New Money" is not despised as it is in some other parts of the world.

      New money people are the dot commers, etc. etc.

      They are first generation rich, and they went to MIT or CalTech, not Harvard.

      They have no "breeding".

      You cannot identify "New Money" by accent or secret handshake.

    31. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather like the PHB who starts discussing computer industry trends. To the rubes, it all sounds the same.
      "Geek speak", "3leet speak" and all the rest are also high context jargons. Those in the culture will recognise those from the similar sounding "market speak".

      Prada is selling to their true geek equivalent. Poseurs need not apply.

    32. Re:Hmm.... by son_of_asdf · · Score: 1

      True enough....I live in the South (Nashville, TN), and "Old Money" represents most of folks of this sort that I have been obliged to deal with.

      --
      Don't Panic!
    33. Re:Hmm.... by Merk · · Score: 1

      Style and quality, sure. You pay double(?) the price of a GAP garment, and it lasts 10% longer. Sure, it's out of style by then anyhow, so anybody who would buy Prada anyhow has already discarded it, but let's ignore that.

      Which is more retarded, $500 shoes or a $500 computer case with neon lights and plexiglass windows? Personally, I think both are dumb, but it's really an individual choice. If you hang around with people that are impressed with $500 shoes, then maybe that $500 is an investment in your social stature. On the other hand, 99% of the world would think you're a moron for wasting money like that. The same case could be made for the computer case.

      As for which one is more likely to get you laid -- that depends on your social circle too. If you hang around with shoe fetishists, or shallow people who a) can tell the difference between a $80 shoe and a $500 shoe b) care c) use that as a reason to screw you, then hey, those shoes just might get you laid. Seems unlikely to me, but maybe such people exist. On the other hand, if your glowey computer case encloses a computer, it can get you to wonderful sites like Craig's List, Nerve, and other personals sites where you can chat with other lonely and/or horny people. In that case, my money's on the computer case.

    34. Re:Hmm.... by frinkster · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't surprise you one bit to find the children of "Old Money" working in an upscale restaurant or store. Families don't stay rich for generations by buying a new BMW for their irresponsible teenagers every time they wreck it. A child born into an "Old Money" family learns how to work hard and to appreciate and manage money just as most middle class children do (or at least should). It's just that they have a bit more money when they become adults.

    35. Re:Hmm.... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > The sales people DO remember their most frequent customers, and the customers are trained by the salesperson to deal only with that salesperson..

      Yes, very true. But I wonder how long that's going to be true. Fast-forward two or three years when every minimum-wage flunky is reading the same script at Wal-Mart. ("Hiya, Clem! Been a few months since I last seen ya! Lemme axe ya sumtin', do ya want another gallon jar of pickles!")

      The Prada employee who gets the commission is going to be the one who says "Who the fuck are you, and what makes you think you're worthy to shop here?" before launching into the sales pitch :)

    36. Re:Hmm.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Club Monaco (a Canadian clothing chain) already puts RFID tags in all of their higher-end merchandise.

      A few years ago, a made up a bunch of T-shirts and sent them out free of charge to members of a website's (one you've probably heard of) email group. Jokingly, I said that the wearers "could all now be tracked" via the internet.

    37. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I'm not exactly a snobbish individual (or so I don't THINK I am) but I do shopt at a lot of the more expensive stores. My personal experience is the truly good stores don't need these RFID tags. The clerk already knows me, and does an excellent job of helping me out. When I go to my favorite wine shop, they know me, what I bought, which vintage I bought, and what I did and didn't like. They're excellent at making great suggestions. They don't need a laptop to tell them what else I might like, ala Amazon.

      That said, however, I think this method of using RFID tags to better serve customers would be much better suited for cheaper shops where clerk turnover is a bit higher, than the specialty shops like Prada, Christian Dior, Salvatore Ferragamo, and so on.

      And for those that think "dressing like a bum" and getting premium service is funny... well, it is. I do it every so often, not on purpose, but because I just happened to be dressed like a punk on the weekend. I walk into the suit tailor's shop, and the other customers give me the weird look. The best part, however, is when the tailor himself comes running up to hold my beaten up back-pack while I check out the fabrics. So maybe I do like being a bit snobbish, but it's in a totally screwed way. ;-)

    38. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, with a dry cool wit like that, you could be an action hero.

      Bet you're a riot at parties.

    39. Re:Hmm.... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I personally prefer Marshall Fields for quality. I got a few shirts there my first year of high school (they were a bit too big then), 4 years later they still look great. I have shirts from Kohls that are ruined after 3 washes or so. So sometimes more money == better product. But not always. Caveat emptor, YMMV.

      --
      My other car is first.
    40. Re:Hmm.... by FerretOnMountDew · · Score: 1

      Well, those $500 shoes will wear out in a year or two. The case, probably five, six years with minor maintenance. More than that even. (Of course, it'll've been gutted a few times over those years to upgrade to newer systems, but we're just talking case here.) So the computer case. ;^)

      --
      Please, do not read this sig
  4. I'm reminded... by Spytap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...of the scene in Minority Report where he walks into The Gap and based on his retina scan is offered another set of pants similar to the ones he's bought there before...
    It creeped me out then and it creeps me out now.

    1. Re:I'm reminded... by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm reminded of the scene in Simple Life where prada shopper Paris Hilton proclaims, "Walmart? Do they sell walls there?"

      --
      mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    2. Re:I'm reminded... by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Should it though?

      If you lived in a small, isolated, town, the shopkeepers there would know far more about you than these corporations will ever be able to milk from audit trails.

      You don't hear people complaining when their waitress remembers what they like to drink...

      I'm mostly playing devil's advocate here, I value my privacy as much as anyone.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:I'm reminded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, too... The pants that he was wearing was perfect good ones!

    4. Re:I'm reminded... by Rallion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, of course, the major difference, besides the insane pervasiveness that has in the movie (that may only be a matter of time, of course) is that this device is a card, that you optain or carry as you please. In MR, they scan your freakin' eyes, man! When you wake up in the morning, it's not like you're gonna say, "Well, I don't think I want to bring my eyeballs with me today, I'll just leave them here on the nightstand."

      Argh. Now I made it more creepy.

    5. Re:I'm reminded... by son_of_asdf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As was I. All of the scenes from MR that showed advertisments blaring out to passerby, recommending personalized buying suggestions and hurling sales pitches pell mell filled me with horror. After the movie was over, I looked over at my wife and said, "When that happens, we're moving to a fucking log cabin on the Blue Ridge."

      Of course, said cabin would be complete with a cutting edge solar/microhydroelectric power system, sattelite Internet Access, etc. My wife is always mystified by the fact that I can peck away at my computers day in and day out, steeping myself in technology, but when it comes to commercial enterprise I run screaming from anything that threatens to invade my mental environment. I don't see any inconsistency there, but hey, YMMV.

      --
      Don't Panic!
    6. Re:I'm reminded... by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It creeped me out then and it creeps me out now.

      Am I the only one who thought that was really cool that they could do that? I know I'd like to come to a store and have people be well equipped to help me get stuff efficiently.

    7. Re:I'm reminded... by mabu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which reminds me.. ..maybe we can put an RFID tag on Spielberg and make sure he never goes near another movie camera again?

      Finally an RFID implementation that would truly benefit mankind.

    8. Re:I'm reminded... by HyperHyper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True about the waitress comment GigsVT.

      I think what bothers people about this is that the waitress actually takes the time to remember what you like/dislike which people like because it makes you feel like someone cares.

      It would sound pretty fake (and make me less likely to shop there again) if I walked into the a franchise store in a city where I've never been and the salesperson would come over and talk to me as if we are old friends.

      Will this lead to people who are targeted as big spenders to get better service because of their past spending sprees? who knows...

      one thing is for sure though, it's coming to stores near you...

      l8r

    9. Re:I'm reminded... by scrytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > You don't hear people complaining when their waitress remembers what they like to drink...

      I would if she wrote it down and faxed it to every other store that paid her a buck for the info.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    10. Re:I'm reminded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I hate about living in a small town: people get to know you. I wish I lived in a city big enough where I never saw the same person twice. I wouldn't want my personal information following me around wherever I went in the form of an RFID tag.

    11. Re:I'm reminded... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm a guy. I don't like to shop around. I just want what I want and then get the hell out of there. I can't wait for the day when Best Buy can hand me the latest Medal of Honor and the new Simpsons DVD box without my even having to go into the store. Just go straight to the cash and my RFID-equipped loyalty card tells them what I want. Beautiful. I can't think of anything better.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    12. Re:I'm reminded... by nizo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You wouldn't feel so bad if you entered the Gap store, and two scantily clad saleswomen arrived to try on gifts for your wife, since Gap would know:

      - You like scantily clad saleswomen

      - It is your wife's birthday the next day

      - Her size

      - You just got a raise at work

      - You never remember your wife's b-day

      - Your blood type, preferences re: scantily clad saleswomen, etc.

      Oh wait....

    13. Re:I'm reminded... by Mateito · · Score: 0

      > I would if she wrote it down and faxed it to every other store that paid her a buck for the info. I wouldn't if that got me a buck off my next drink...

    14. Re:I'm reminded... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I would if she wrote it down and faxed it to every other store that paid her a buck for the info."

      There's this Starbucks I regularly visit. I'm quite peculiar with how I like my favourite drink prepared, and I've asked for it so many times, that at some point they started making it as soon as they saw my face.

      But the thing is, I don't always order the same drink everyday, so after preparing a few for nothing, they've learned to wait til I ordered before starting to prepare it.

      Humans are fickle. Put that in your paper trail, and smoke it.

    15. Re:I'm reminded... by dontspellsogood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I too don't dig people being able to track too much about me, it is really great for customer service. Re: someone new to you knowing all about you... well, if it makes my customer experience better then thats great.

      I know that if you stay at a Four Seasons, they keep a database record of you that is reviewed before you check in. They know you like East facing rooms, never use the turn down service, are allergic to feather pillows and always order up pancakes for breakfast. Not having to explain how I like my club sandwich (extra mayo) each time makes things so much easier.

      For $60/70 a night there's no reason why other chains like Embassy Suites or whatever couldn't track the same things.. especially if you travel a lot for business.

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
    16. Re:I'm reminded... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean, Jesus Christ, what does a man need with two pairs of pants?!!! Idiotic decadence, I tells ya! I can see why you might also need a pair of shorts too, but this is outrageous!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    17. Re:I'm reminded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Buy can hand me the latest Medal of Honor and the new Simpsons DVD box without my even having to go into the store

      They'd NEVER do that- Browsers buy more stuff. They'd never cut out your ability to browse.

    18. Re:I'm reminded... by japhmi · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't feel so bad if you entered the Gap store, and two scantily clad saleswomen arrived to try on gifts for your wife

      Get that system at Victoria Secret's and I'd start buying stock...

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    19. Re:I'm reminded... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I'm with the people who also point out that the waitress does not normally share this with all of her associates and all of the waitresses at other locations of the same restaurant. The other thing to point out with respect to the staff at local shops, like restaurants, corner stores, neighborhood hardware shops, etc is that the customers are just as likely to get to know the people working at the store, so it is/was something of a two-way street.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    20. Re:I'm reminded... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      If it meant my Raspberry Long Island was going to be made EXACTLY according to my wishes (STIR the god damn thing! And use a SHOT of Chambord! I'll KILL YOU!) everytime I walked into an airport Cheers, then I wouldn't give a shit. Actually that'd be kind of nifty...add my beverage choice to my Frequent Flyer information, accessible through my RFID-enabled card in my wallet. My flight gets delayed, I can walk into a Cheers, plop down, and get a complimentary .

      I can definitely see this taking off, just for the fact that marketing types are going to salivate, and it's an ADDED VALUE for the consumer, not just blatant and obvious predatory marketing. And if you don't like it, you can opt-out. I'm all about opting-out.

    21. Re:I'm reminded... by jskiff · · Score: 1

      ...maybe we can put an RFID tag on Spielberg and make sure he never goes near another movie camera again?

      Ummm, I think you misspelled "Lucas"...

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    22. Re:I'm reminded... by ewall · · Score: 1

      Cayce Pollard's skin would crawl, or at least more than her usual reaction to Prada merch... On my list, RFID tracking is ranking up with "viral marketing" schemes (e.g. hired bloggers and word-of-mouth adverts). 'Course, I don't buy or wear Prada either!

      --
      Karma Police, come arrest this man...
    23. Re:I'm reminded... by corprew · · Score: 1

      That's just saying that the starbucks employees aren't complex enough to predict when you're ordering a certain thing, not that there isn't an algorithm complex enough to predict it. There may be some underlying reason to why you're ordering particular things such as temperature, cloudiness, time of day, etc... that could be divined given the right inputs.

      For example, large numbers of people would probably order different things depending on the time of day, temperature outside, and other factors that might not be immediately obvious to the starbucks' employee, but the computer would probably be able to see the correllation of particular factors fairly easily.

      Here's an example: I tend to get soy-milk lattes in the morning and nonfat-milk lattes in the afternoon on weekdays. On the weekends, I usually get diet rockstars. On weekends when they're out of the energy drink, the barista generally mentions that when i walk up to the counter, and guesses correctly what i want. I also get iced lattes when it is hot at my location, and they're usually able to remember that.

      Now, I've been going there off and on for about 4 years, so they've had plenty of time to figure out that pattern, and the long-time baristas are right 90-odd percent of the time. It probably wouldn't take a computer that long to figure out the same pattern in a different sort of store, as there are probably 1000s of people who respond in roughly the same way I do.

    24. Re:I'm reminded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's stopping you right now?

      Circuit City advertises being able to order on their web site and being able to pick it up at the store all ready to go. You do have to enter the store, but only as far as the service desk. Pay and go...

      Now, you might not want to shop there, but other places are sure to offer this if it is popular.

    25. Re:I'm reminded... by qtp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you lived in a small, isolated, town, the shopkeepers there would know far more about you than these corporations will ever be able to milk from audit trails.

      If you lived in a small, isolated, town, you would likely know as much about the shopkeeper as he knows about you.

      And having lived in a small, but not so isolated town, I can say there is a much higher level of comfort and trust when you've known the local "Dusty Roads" storekeeper as your best friend's granddad than when the salesclone at Prada in SF knows what you bought last week in NY.

      I wonder how long it will be before the Department of Homeland Security is given access to all of these records. You can never bee too sure if that guy buying stockings is really a transvestite! He just might be a terrorist looking for a more stylish mask!

      --
      Read, L
    26. Re:I'm reminded... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Actually, the computer said "Hello Mr. (Japanese name), did you like the (some woman's clothing?) you got last time?", because the character had his eyes changed. :)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    27. Re:I'm reminded... by mabu · · Score: 1

      Ummm, I think you misspelled "Lucas"...

      Is there a difference? They're both washed up directors who haven't made a good movie in almost 20 years.

    28. Re:I'm reminded... by jskiff · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...in the last 20 years, Spielberg has come out with:

      Catch Me If You Can
      Saving Private Ryan
      Schindler's List
      Jurassic Park
      Empire of the Sun
      The Color Purple

      Maybe you wouldn't call all of them great, but most of them are at least good.

      Lucas, on the other hand....

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    29. Re:I'm reminded... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, I must've missed the Gap store where the average male customer wants to see scantily clad women. Perhaps I'm just basing this off the Gaps in Minneapolis and San Francisco.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    30. Re:I'm reminded... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      If you want to buy something without having to walk into a store, try buying it online. Then there's no need to worry, and you can shop in your underware.

    31. Re:I'm reminded... by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but would you really want to flirt with a computerized barista, Corp?

  5. The Prada Defense by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Winona Ryder's Lawyer: Your honor, my client wasn't stealing, she just thought stores worked that way.

    1. Re:The Prada Defense by mesach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      think about it, If they have your CC on file attached to your VIP Card, then all you have to do is select the merchandise you want and walk away with it, you will automagically be charged and I wont have to deal with any stupid sales people.

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:The Prada Defense by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem with that being if your CC on file is attached your VIP card, then anyone warshopping can sniff your ID and rebroadcast, grabbing up items and having them charged to your account.

      I'm all for more user personalization, this is really no different from what Amazon does, except in a brick-and-mortar. As long as I can remove the RFID tag when I get home I'm good to go.

    3. Re:The Prada Defense by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Combine that thought with the swiping of RFID info posted above, and it turns into identity theft of a new sort.

      Sometimes it's NOT good to be rich (and technologically illiterate!).

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:The Prada Defense by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Mobil already do this with their Speedpass card?

      The CC doesn't have to be broadcast from your card, it can be linked via your registration with the store when you got the VIP card in the first place...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:The Prada Defense by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      True but it's the same thing. Linking the unique ID to a CC on the server-side means I can't sniff the actual card number, but I can still spoof you if I sniff and rebroadcast the same ID. That's actually not a bad idea, sniffing other people's SpeedPass' to get free gas.

      Well, OK...illegal. But outside of that...have you seen gas prices recently?

    6. Re:The Prada Defense by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      right, but once they figure out something's afoot, they simply get a new pass and you gotta resniff.

    7. Re:The Prada Defense by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      You would have to seriously be within a few inches to sniff it. The speedpass gadget is totally unpowered, it uses a tiny antenna to act as an inductive power source for an insanely weak transmitter.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    8. Re:The Prada Defense by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      Reasonable. Why not a portable hand-held POWERED sniffer, then? You'd have to code the firmware to be able to distinguish multiple signals in one location, but it could be done, and pretty cheap. Wal-Mart is using portable hand-held units for it's RFID shipping dealy. Even with only a small power source, it'd be possible to sniff from a short distance, say from the other side of the pump.

      I'm thinking too hard about this, aren't I?

    9. Re:The Prada Defense by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Sounds great to me. All I'll have to do is find a way to fool the computers into thinking I am Bill Gates or Hillary Rosen and it will be round the clock shopping sprees for me!

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    10. Re:The Prada Defense by fishbonez · · Score: 1
      Sometimes it's NOT good to be rich

      <motorhead>
      It's certainly not good if there is a hungry Lemme in the vicinity.
      </motorhead>

      --
      Frylock: That's not a toy!
      Master Shake: You say that about everything you own. You should own toys. They're fun.
    11. Re:The Prada Defense by dspeyer · · Score: 1
      If you combine the RFID with a smartcard system, this can be secured

      The store transmits a random number. The smartcard digitally signs it. The stores checks the digital signiture with the card's public key. The private key is never transmitted anywhere.

      Not that they'll get it right the first time, but after a few high-profile thefts, they'll bring in programmers who knows what they're doing.

    12. Re:The Prada Defense by Mmm_Coco · · Score: 1

      Yea, it is also just as easy to take someone's credit card, and use it to pay for anything. But why don't people do this as often as they steal cash? Because the penalties are so much higher. Sniffing someone's card number and spoofing the ID, which is linked to the CC, is still credit card fraud. The high penalties would deter most people

  6. Not the only store. by Saven+Marek · · Score: 2, Troll

    I have it on good authority (from an ex apple store employee) that Apple's stores in the US also use these tags, and frequently.

    Of course I don't expect to see a negative view of that here, being Apple and all.

    1. Re:Not the only store. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      IF they did do that and it was publicized you can be assured that people would be defending them saying how it helps them serve you better, help control costs (and passes the savings to the consumer) and, hey, we can trust Apple!

      Of course, if anyone here was a passonate lover of Prada stores, they would post the same thing about them too.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Not the only store. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use them how ??? Do you get an apple prefered card ? If you don't get some identifying item like that it would be hard to use the technology like this...

      Troll, RTFA and then say somthing that is even applicable meathead...

    3. Re:Not the only store. by nojomofo · · Score: 1

      Not sure that it's the same thing at all as Prada. After all, usually when I walk into an Apple store, I'm not carrying any Apple merchandise with me. So they have no idea who I am. Would they be able to use RFID for anything but the "standard" inventory control and theft prevention?

    4. Re:Not the only store. by lemonylimey · · Score: 1

      Apart from a powerbook, ibook, ipod, mini ipod, Apple Watch, Apple Pen, Apple laptop bag...

    5. Re:Not the only store. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1, Troll

      If they're anything like apple's woeful airport quality, then you'll easily be able to tell when an employee is scanning you for an RFID tag. They'll have to hold the scanner up to your flesh, and leave it there for ten minutes straight

      Never seen an Apple product wireless work reliably more than 30 feet.

    6. Re:Not the only store. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1

      If you don't get some identifying item like that it would be hard to use the technology like this...


      I wouldn't be surprised if their built into the apple products themselves.

    7. Re:Not the only store. by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Apple could start requiring its users to get 666 tattoos or big-brother-monitor implants and peoplke would still continue to whorship at the altar of Jobs.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    8. Re:Not the only store. by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you mean by tags like these. I've never been offered an apple card or anything else i would carry into an apple store after i bought it. I foyu mena for security, i assume you're right since they leave these expensive computers (laptops especially) just sitting there. Anyone with a bag could proly nab one.

    9. Re:Not the only store. by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      Of course I don't expect to see a negative view of that here, being Apple and all.
      Riiiight, because nobody ever says anything bad about Apple here.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:Not the only store. by justinstreufert · · Score: 1

      When I had a Titanium Powerbook, the range was excellent. With Apple and non-Apple 802.11b APs, it worked from across a warehouse. Excellent range.

      The one time I used it with an Airport AP, I was on the 1st floor of a house and it was on the 3rd floor. Still got five out of five bars and several megabits to the Internet. No problems.

      I think we both have a small N but I can say with some authority that at least some Apple wireless products work great, some of the time ;)

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
  7. NO WAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My login name for Amazon.com does the same thing when I walk through the door of their e-Store. GOD HELP US ALL THEY ARE AFTER US!!!11!

    1. Re:NO WAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOD HELP US ALL THEY ARE AFTER US!!!

      Not you, your money. Once they have it all, you're superfluous to their operation except as a product.

      So, to escape the system:
      1. Spend all your money at Amazon and stop earning more money.
      2. Change your preferences after you go broke so their profile of you will be inaccurate and without real value.
      3. Cut off your right hand to get rid of the RFID tag they put in you.

    2. Re:NO WAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolololo amazon is teh suck!!!1!!

  8. Tag the rich by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Tag the rich
    2. Track their locations
    3. Take incriminating paparazzi pictures
    4. ????
    5. Profit!

    John.

    1. Re:Tag the rich by mesach · · Score: 1

      There is no step 4 in this... the incriminating paparazi photos are enough to garner a nice profit.

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:Tag the rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Blackmail rich people?

    3. Re:Tag the rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fourth step is not unknown.
      ???? = Sell pictures to tabloid media.
      Steps 2 - 4 are a tried and true business model.
      All you added was the tag in step 1 to make step 2 easier.

    4. Re:Tag the rich by Boing · · Score: 5, Funny
      Tag the rich

      Why not? We already monitor their breeding habits (Paris Hilton, Pam Anderson, etc.) It's purely for scientific purposes, I assure you.

    5. Re:Tag the rich by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      That ???? = sell to an approriate tabloid (assuming the person is both rich and famous). This one actually works!

    6. Re:Tag the rich by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person that thinks Paris Hilton's face is hideous? No wonder that video was shot in the dark, who could keep it going while staring at that mug?

  9. Technical information on RFID? by JBMcB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's involved in reading an RFID? Is there a standard on what is on an RFID, with vendor ID's set aside as in Ethernet MAC addresses, or is it just a generic number format like with barcodes?

    It would be interesting to get a nice, sensitive, portable RFID antenna hooked up to a laptop and go, uhm, war-walking...

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Technical information on RFID? by piobair · · Score: 2, Informative

      Problem with that idea is antennas are specific to the type of RFID technology used. So you'd probably need a collection of dozens of scanner and antenna combinations to pull that off.

      Nice idea though.

      --
      I have a second sig, I call it sig#2.
    2. Re:Technical information on RFID? by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This question gets asked every time the subject comes up so I have one suggestion. The February 2004 issue of "Circuit Cellar" has a nuts-bolts article about RFID called "Low-Cost RFID Solution", but also states that "Many RFID protols are available only under NDA". It also refers to www.rfidjournal.com as a good starting point.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:Technical information on RFID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just spend 10 minuites researching which standard they use.

      Duh.

    4. Re:Technical information on RFID? by piobair · · Score: 1

      Standard? Um we're talking about RFIDs here. Each manufacturer has their own little twist on things. You may get someone to cough up which manufacturer they use - if they know. Then you're only looking at a few antenna/scanner combinations. But, as for doing something like "war-walking" good luck with that.

      --
      I have a second sig, I call it sig#2.
    5. Re:Technical information on RFID? by Serious+Simon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try ISO 15693, part 2 and 3 (part 1 is not that interesting). You can order it with your national standards organization. Much cheaper: you can find the final drafts of the standards on the Internet, e.g. at http://perso.wanadoo.fr/dgil/14443/

  10. I was going to post a rant by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I only had the money, I would complaint about privacy violation at my local friendly Prada boutique.

    1. Re:I was going to post a rant by SparafucileMan · · Score: 0
      No, you wouldn't. You wouldn't care because, if it ever became a problem, your expensive lawyer would sue the pants off the company. In this manner the rich get richer.

      Privacy is only a concern of the powerful and the poor (middle class, etc...anyone who isn't rich).

  11. What about changes in shopping preferences? by bad+enema · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok. So what if the customer totally changed his/her shopping habits? DaddyMoreBucks' 15 year old daughter might suddenly decide she wants to look (gothic/punk/gansta/whatever) instead of (gothic/punk/gansta/whatever). Doesn't seem like she'd be too keen on being haggled to buy something she's trying to change from.

    1. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The odds of finding anything gothic, punk, or gansta at Prada is slim to not. If you are in the store, that's where you are shopping. Thus information about what you got there last time is relevent.

      I for one like being target based on what I buy. I get a lot of import DVDs from Suncoast. Thus they send me a catalog of movies that are like the ones they know I buy. I fail to understand why thats a bad thing.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      The answer to insufficient data is ... more data.

      If the algorithm is worth it's salt, it will quickly adjust its suggestions upon learning of the change in habits.

      The stores which implement such intelligent algorithms should be more successful(unless there is a benefit to giving a customer bad suggestions).

    3. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Do you know what Prada is? It's for people that are better than goths, punks and gangstas, and in fact are better than children or the people who have them. And they're also better than racial minorities. And people who are twice as smart as them (a.k.a., the average person).

      In this specific case that's not an issue at all, I think. But in other cases, I think it wouldn't be a problem at all. It's not as if the system somehow restricts you from buying different things, and it doesn't actually communicate with you directly, it uses another human to do that -- who would understand if you just told them about any change in preference. And, ideally, would be able to signify that in the database, but I don't think it would make a big difference. Maybe one or two instances of somebody not knowing what you want for a few seconds.

    4. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by bad+enema · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking in terms of if/when this technology spreads beyond Prada. Personally I don't shop at Prada, I get my jeans at Walmart, so I admit I don't anything about Prada. However if we consider scenarios lesser than the extremes, what if customers with frequent changes in fashion taste (again, youth) don't want to buy something that's "so last month!".

      I understand how you would enjoy getting a catalog from Suncoast but it's the convenience of the catalog that you're enjoying. You can shop from your own home. In this case, you're already in the store, you already know what section of the store you've bought stuff before, so if you were really there to buy the same stuff then this technology would give you someone to walk you the fifty or so feet to that particular section of the store. Never mind that most customers, like myself, would rather not be haggled even for the time it takes me to walk that fifty feet.

    5. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by bad+enema · · Score: 1

      Well first of all I'd like to assume that your racist comments were out of satire. If not, then as a member of a racial minority myself I'd have to thank you for allowing me to ignore your posts more conveniently in the future.

      But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, for discussion's sake.

      This technology appears to me to help salespeople a lot more than customers. Salespeople itching to score on commission would flock to the easy buyers because they know they have a higher chance of making a sale with the information provided to them.

      But what if customers don't like being classified? What if we don't want a pushy salesperson in our faces as soon as we walk in the door? In this sort of atmosphere I'd imagine that the popularity of Internet shopping would go through the roof.

    6. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by CoolToddHunter · · Score: 1

      ...I get my jeans at Walmart...most customers, like myself, would rather not be haggled...

      And that's why you buy at Walmart. I don't think we'll see this in Walmart any time soon, because Walmart doesn't serve their customers in that fashion. Many, like yourself, don't like it, and it keeps their overhead low. Prada, on the other hand, is very expensive and depends on full service (appeals to those used to having servants, I suppose). This is why Walmart has RFID for inventory and Prada has RFID for service.

    7. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the best reason to make the cards optional. If they were required for admittance, than I'd certainly share your concern. As long as they're not, it's fine. Some people like having people fawn all over them, after all.

      And yes, of course the racial comment was satire, and the satire was a little more angry and disgusted than most.

    8. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by bad+enema · · Score: 1

      "appeals to those used to having servants, I suppose" Hey hey, I thought we abolished slavery in this country a while back. :) But in all seriousness, you made some good points. I never had the mentality of a rich person but now that you point it out, I can see why'd they enjoy the service.

    9. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by Alekzander · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I highly doubt that stupidity is relegated specifically to class. I know many 'average' people that would be considered 'half' the intelligence of some Prada shoppers. Stupidity knows no boundaries - neither race, nor gender, nor social status will keep a dumbass from being a dumbass.

      --
      Those who would impede freedom, impede life.
    10. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for people that are better than goths

      The typical bum on the street?

    11. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by beebware · · Score: 1

      servants!=slaves.
      You pay servants (such as butlers, maids etc) whereas you "own" slaves.
      Fine point, but it had to be made. Well, it didn't - but having a "sex servant" doesn't sound as cool as having a "sex slave" does it? (a sex servant would just be a prostitute)

    12. Re:What about changes in shopping preferences? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      It all depends on what they do with the info. If only suncoast keeps the info that is great but if you start getting visits from Darth Ashcroft becuase you bought the collectors edition of Lawerence of Arabia then you'll start to see the problem.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  12. That's nothing by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dolce and Gabbana bring favored clients complementary champagne as they enter the store. In the changing room, the drugs in the champagne take effect. While unconscious, the clients have RFID tags implanted at the back of the skull under the hairline.

    And at Barney's, they just knock you over, slip a collar around your neck, pick you up and let you continue shopping. No "Excuse me, it's store policy" or anything.

    1. Re:That's nothing by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      At Moe's bar, he abuses every equally. Takes less effort that way.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:That's nothing by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Wow....I didn't expect to see this kind of humor on Slashdot. And about Barney's, their workers really are that brutal. I was at one where my father purchased something, and he wanted to put it on two seperate credit cards. The checkout girl gave him shit for that, and then proceeded to ask him for something to verify his signature. He pointed to the back of the card (it was somewhat faded) and the clerk DEMANDED to see another form of identification.

      Now, whatever the reasoning behind it, and regardless of whether or not it was a smart thing for her to ask to confirm the signature, the fact that she DEMANDED in such an indignant fashion definitely helped shape my current impression of their store, as much as I like the shades of blue one of the lines they carry uses.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:That's nothing by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, I'd be glad that they're demanding to check that I'm not actually someone who stole my card. You have to admit, from the outside, it is suspicious when someone asks to split an item across two cards (like maybe they're overspending). Of course, I can't imagine what this situation is, considering I regularly get pre-approved offers for credit limits over twice my yearly income... (which is pretty annoying, because I wouldn't want someone else sending in my application and getting a card in my name).

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
    4. Re:That's nothing by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I understand that, my point was the attitude she was giving my father. This is supposed to be a classy store, and there's certain expectations of how one will be treated in it which she clearly was not meeting.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:That's nothing by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. All I got out of your original post was what she did, not really how; this text medium can be limiting at times. There's certainly a difference between saying "I can't see the fucking signature on your damn card. Give me another proof of ID or you ain't leaving the store with that vase" and "I'm sorry, the signature on your card is kind of worn out, and you know, this is a lot of money, so do you happen to have another form of ID with you, maybe a driver's license?" Too bad most Slashdaughters (and Americans) don't seem to get it.

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
  13. And in the meantime.... by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I buy pants from Target I get to simply tap on a small device outside the changing rooms which, upon generating a small noise, identifies me to the salespeople as needing access. They then use one of their access control devices to allow me to gain access to the room.

    Don't even get me started on the 'pants restraining device' that wraps around my waist.

    1. Re:And in the meantime.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to be a fireman

  14. All the items are RFID tagged to, leading to.... by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Funny

    changing room: I'm sorry m'am, but we have you at a size 10, but you have 5 items that are a size 5, you are either trying to steal these items are you are about to ruin these items by trying them on.

    customer: open the changing room doors please

    changing room: I'm sorry, I can't do that

  15. Who says Prada isn't good value ? by openSoar · · Score: 1

    let's see, a new pc or a new shirt ?

    1. Re:Who says Prada isn't good value ? by mesach · · Score: 1

      Why is it so hard for people to understand the way pricing goes for Computers, when it goes theexact same way for clothing... something you bought last week is now out of style and on sale, and the new instyle piece is full pop, of course, that shirt you bought 5 years ago might still be wearable, depending on how you took care of it, your computer however is relegated to either your grandma for email, or you are using it for a firewall.

      Actually now that I think of it, the shirt just like the computer will get relegated to other duties as it gets older also.

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:Who says Prada isn't good value ? by openSoar · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure what you comment means - i was merely pointing out the fact that the same amount of cash as the list price for a prada shirt would get you a pretty nice pc - seems like a lot of money for a shirt to me..

    3. Re:Who says Prada isn't good value ? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > something you bought last week is now out of style and on sale, and the new instyle piece is full pop

      Umm, except that those dress shirts aren't a new style. Hell, it's probably not even a new material or anything. I have 8-yr old shirts that look like that, but they sure as hell didn't cost $225 each.

  16. RFIDs don't kill... people kill by Total_Wimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some people seem to think anything RFID has to be bad. This proves that doesn't have to be the case. These folks are open about the use of the RFIDs and they use it to provide real value to the customer. There's nothing wrong with that at all.

    Compare/contrast to Wal-Mart which isn't open about the use of RFIDs and doesn't give the customer anything of value when they're installed. Since the customer knows nothing about the RFIDs, they don't have real choice in whether they want "to participate" in potentially privacy invading information gathering. Prada, by being open about the tags, alows the customer to simply shop somewhere else if they don't like them.

    TW

    1. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by signe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bravo on point 1. You're a little off on point 2.

      Wal-Mart is implementing RFIDs on incoming shipments, not individual products. The pallets being delievered will each have an RFID tag on them, so they can be automatically inventoried as they are delivered from the manufacturers/distributors, as they're moved around the warehouses, shipped to stores, etc. The individual products (what the customer buys) will not have RFID tags in them. So the only effect on the customer at all is the possibility of Wal-Mart dropping prices even more as their inventory process becomes more streamlined.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    2. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by standard+method · · Score: 2

      Well, having worked in the retail field for a few years, and even having some time at Wal-Mart under my belt (a dubious distinction at best), I know the problems with inventory and receiving orders. The problem, of course, is human error. Not just on the receiving side, either, there is substantial human error in the sending side as well. If your RFID tag says that you've got 20 cases of whatever on a pallette, and you've got 19, or maybe 19 of those and a 20th of something incredibly similar but of a different variety, with a different SKU number and designation, then relying on RFID tags to receive and send orders can get a bit complicated.

      --
      "I'll be a killer whale, when I grow up"
      -Wintersleep
    3. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what makes you think that this provides "real value" to the customer. The idea is to make the customer spend more. And who's to say that the store won't start charging the preferred customers higher prices for the same items. Amazon did it until they got caught.

    4. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the tag stays with you after you leave the store. ANYONE can read theat tag, along with other tags.

      What happens when somebody is able to buy info that ties a tag back to your name, address, phone, etc? They know where you've been, what your doing, without you even knowing or giving permission. You don't think that could be abused?

    5. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pallets being delievered will each have an RFID tag on them, so they can be automatically inventoried as they are delivered from the manufacturers/distributors, as they're moved around the warehouses, shipped to stores, etc

      A fucking sticker with a barcode on it would work just as well.

    6. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fucking sticker with a barcode on it would work just as well.

      No, it wouldn't. The sticker would always have to be able to be sighted, and it probably couldn't be read at any meaningful distance.

      This is like the gas meter on my house. Back in the day, you'd be minding your own business, then at the door....

      WHUMP! WHUMP! WHUMP! WHUMP! "GAS MAN!!!"

      You'd have to let the guy in to read the meter, and then he'd move on to the next house. A few years back they replaced my gas meter with one that can be read electronically from a van driving down my street. They can do the whole block of gas meters (and on both sides of the street) in the time it took the guy on foot to do two houses.

      That's the kind of efficiency increase RFID promises. Unfortunately, it also promises to be abused by evil, greedy companies who will collect and sell every iota of data about you that they can possibly scan from the RFID tags on the products you own when you walk onto their property.

    7. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      What happens when somebody is able to buy info that ties a tag back to your name, address, phone, etc? They know where you've been, what your doing, without you even knowing or giving permission. You don't think that could be abused?

      Yea, I know. I've been thinking about getting rid of my e-mail too.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    8. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that there was a big push to put them on individual items. I seem to recall razors and clothing being mentioned as potential items with individual RFIDs either in the packaging or actually woven into the fabric. My understanding was that Wal-mart would use this not only for recieving goods, but also for inventory of goods on the shelf, possibly even with smart shelves.

      TW

    9. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by signe · · Score: 1

      The did investigate it, but the trial was cancelled in favor of using RFID in the warehouses, due to the lower tag and computational costs.

      Link to old article: Here

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    10. Re:RFIDs don't kill... people kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fucking sticker with a barcode on it would work just as well.

      No, it wouldn't. The sticker would always have to be able to be sighted, and it probably couldn't be read at any meaningful distance.


      We're talking PALLETS of product here. They only have 4 sides. If it's too hard to check all four sides (in a worst-case scenario, it's only 2 sides on average), then print 4 fucking stickers, one for each side. It's still a HELL of a lot cheaper than RFID tags and equipment.
      And barcodes can be printed at any size- the limit is the size of the reader.

      You'd have to let the guy in to read the meter, and then he'd move on to the next house. A few years back they replaced my gas meter with one that can be read electronically from a van driving down my street. They can do the whole block of gas meters (and on both sides of the street) in the time it took the guy on foot to do two houses.


      1) They should have put the gas meter OUTSIDE the house. Then the guy can read it anytime, without disturbing the owner.

      2) How much did all those new meters cost? The reading equipment? And how many YEARS could they have paid the meter reader for that same amount?

  17. And the thing about Prada that is most positive... by Futaba-chan · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...are our changing rooms. These wonderful rooms do not have doors which automatically lock behind you, and the temperature inside does not increase whatsoever.

    Just listen to this other real human being who have successfully shopped for an article of clothing at Prada:

    "I enjoyed my experience at Prada, and especially the changing rooms. When I had completed my trying on of an article of clothing, I was free to leave, uncooked and totally alive. It is a good store."

    So take it from me, Zalgon-23-Prada: our changing rooms are the best! In fact, you should go in them even if you have no intention of trying on any articles of human clothing. I should know, as I am a human being just like yourself.

  18. Clippy in the dressing room... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    "I see you're trying to put your trousers on two legs at a time."

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Clippy in the dressing room... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I see you're trying to put on clothing two sizes too small. May I direct you to:
      1. one of our 746 MSN articles on the Atkins diet?
      2. an item of clothing two sizes larger?
      3. hotmail, where you can email your friends about how insulting I'm being?
      4. a 'fat' store?
      "

    2. Re:Clippy in the dressing room... by addaon · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not a leg, you insensitive clod!

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  19. Good afternoon by ekephart · · Score: 5, Funny

    and welcome to WalMart. My name is Cletis and I will be your personal saleman. Your most recent purchases include one Remington Bolt Action 700 CDL, two First Response Pregnancy Tests, and a case of motor oil. [Click, click, click] Can I interest you in a 1 Gallon Jar of Pickles?

    --
    sig
    1. Re:Good afternoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it is walmart, I think the proper response would be knitting needles and garbage bags

    2. Re:Good afternoon by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 1

      ...and welcome to WalMart. My name is Cletis and I will be your personal saleman.

      You forgot to add "Can I hep youuuu? What I can do fer youuuu?"

    3. Re:Good afternoon by fltsimbuff · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How about this one?

      "Welcome to Walmart, my name is Larry. You're most recent purchases include:

      The XFiles, Seasons 1-8 on DVD
      The book "Big Brother: The truth about RFID."
      2 Rolls of tin foil.
      A Plaid hunting vest.
      A .44 Magnum
      2 150 round boxes of ammo.

      [Click, Click, Click, CLICK, BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG, THUD, *Crazed ranting*]...

    4. Re:Good afternoon by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Welcome to First National Bank. We can see that you recently purchased two semi automatics, two ski masks, and a used car. How much will you be withdrawing today?

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    5. Re:Good afternoon by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      "Damn, the wife wants to kill me again..."

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    6. Re:Good afternoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't read January's article of Fast Company, did you? Tsk, tsk.

  20. Video-Mirrors by FashionNugget · · Score: 4, Funny

    >>The dressing rooms also contain a video-based "Magic Mirror" which allows a customer to see an image of their back. The video-feed is also forwarded to Prada's central data bank, where it is stored for future sale to various tabloids.

    1. Re:Video-Mirrors by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 0
      You jest about the mirror, but I'm waiting to see some true innovation in dressing rooms that would provide such a feature. As well as video feeds of your sides, and whatever angles you want. This could all be displayed on a tiled screen.

      Then you need a conveyor belt. How cool would it be if you wanted to you could just try walking in something in the dressing room and see how it looks from every angle?

      They have the technology, and most stores have only a few dressing rooms so it shouldn't be TOO expensive. Hmmmm, maybe I should invent this and sell it to them.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  21. haute couture/uberdesigner clothes consumers by tuxette · · Score: 3, Informative

    They don't care how they look in that Prada or D&G or whatever it is they're wearing as long as it's the latest designs. In fact, I doubt most of them would want to see a picture of their behinds because they'll suddenly start feeling fat or something. What they want is for the salesgirl to say "Oh, yes, you look fabulous in that! And so slim! And that color really brings out your eyes! Yes, it's really you!"

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:haute couture/uberdesigner clothes consumers by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "In fact, I doubt most of them would want to see a picture of their behinds because they'll suddenly start feeling fat or something. What they want is for the salesgirl to say "Oh, yes, you look fabulous in that! And so slim! And that color really brings out your eyes! Yes, it's really you!"

      BZZZZZT!!! WRONG!!!! Their typical customers are very adept socially. They are typically attractive, have decent fashion sense, and would want to feel satisfied they look right in the clothes. They EXPECT the salesperson to treat them like that regardless of how much truth there is to it. That's half the reason they come to these stores, is because they know they'll be waited on hand and foot by a bunch of Yes-Men/Women.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  22. Minority Report coming to us by Petronius · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I would love to see such a device. Would it be illegal under the DMCA?

    --
    there's no place like ~
  23. I've got to say... by shidoshi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...part of me says, who cares?

    Yes yes, I see the privacy concerns. But on the other hand, people in stores currently aren't exactly trying to remember who you are and what you like. If they have a palm whatever to give them a better understanding of your tastes, they can be far more helpful in less time.

    Getting past the personal buying history, however, those dressing rooms are certainly okay in my book. I like the idea of tags in the clothing displaying information on a screen, and come on... that "magic mirror" would make trying on clothing so much more enjoyable an experience. (At least, for those of us who actually care enough to put some effort in the way we dress.)

  24. Popularizing controversial tech by cookie_cutter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Interestingly, in a recent Wired magazing article, Bruce Sterling argues that the best way to popularize genetically modified foods would be to promote them as luxury items:

    "if Fortune 500 CEOs sought it out to feed their children, the world would follow"

    1. Re:Popularizing controversial tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think of Wired as a luxury item full of genetically modified writers.

    2. Re:Popularizing controversial tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just have Janet Jackson uncover it at the next superbowl.

  25. Friendly local vs friendly global by lysium · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The days of going to your friendly local are over

    The frequent Prada shopper does not just shop in one city. They will expect the same level of 'courteous' service in New York, Paris, Los Angeles, and perhaps Milan; these RFID tags will give it to them.

    It's not all that bad of an idea. I suspect that these shoppers will not be plagued with advertisements or other spam; they are rich, after all, and not the average dime-a-dozen consumer. The advertisers will be desperate not to offend them.

    ==============

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Friendly local vs friendly global by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone else reminded of Minority Report? Substitute RFID tags for Retinal Scanners, and your there. That's where we are heading folks...

      I have no problem with a store doing this when I give permission. I also have no problem with RFID tags IN THE STORE. It's when they stay on after I leave with my purchase, open for anyone to read, that I have a problem.

    2. Re:Friendly local vs friendly global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, and quite a few other posters in this thread have pointed it out too.

    3. Re:Friendly local vs friendly global by amembleton · · Score: 1

      Prada's website: prada.com doesn't seem to have any information about their stores. It was also written in Frontpage 4.0!

    4. Re:Friendly local vs friendly global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rich people do not surf the web. They hire assistants to do it for them.

  26. Would be fun to hack those RFIDs by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ought to get some cute replies from anyone behind the counter then... "Oh hey mister Baggins... Just wondering though, you might be interested in a nuclear warhead, Thunderbird 1 and screwing my sist- ..."

  27. Who to roll by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. learn prada's RFID tags
    2. scan random people for them
    3. mug the people who have them

    Nice simple way to know who's got $$ and who hasn't. Random credit card numbers might be nice if you only want a few hundred from each of them, but oh what a platinum visa might be worth.

    1. Re:Who to roll by EulerX07 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's great that a mugging strategy got modded interesting on /.

      News for Thugs. Stuff that matters.

    2. Re:Who to roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hereby coin the term `war-RFIDing", pronounced warfidding.

    3. Re:Who to roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Profit

    4. Re:Who to roll by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      I think it's great that a mugging strategy got modded interesting on /.

      News for Thugs. Stuff that matters.

      The editors are still deciding whether to change the name of the site to Smashdot or Snatchdot.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    5. Re:Who to roll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snatchdot is the Pr0n server, you insensitive idiot!

    6. Re:Who to roll by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      It's not mugging. It's social cracking.
      Now, if it ran Linux, it would get a story of its own!

  28. Time to start... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...wrapping all my credit cards in aluminum foil.

    1. Re:Time to start... by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1

      It's tin foil you idiot! Psychotronic rays go through aluminum like butter!

  29. Encounter Prada saleswomen often... by bmf033069 · · Score: 1

    "When you encounter a saleswoman, her handheld computer brings up your tastes, buying history, vital statistics and personalized suggestions from in-stock and coming inventory..."

  30. How do they do it? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can Prada afford all this technology and still only charge $1000.00 for a handbag?

  31. the thing is... by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny
    when you shop at places like that, "everyone" is a size five...or zero for that matter.

    shopper: I'll take this in a size four!

    salesgirl: she's at least a ten Of course, madame. discreetly removes size label. Here you go. Size four!

    Same principle with shoes.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  32. Nouveau rich vs. real rich by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the very wealthy send personal shoppers to stores and accept/reject the new clothing in their own homes.

    And that's for ready-to-wear. For tailored stuff (and who isn't rich and wearing custom tailored suits?), the tailor or his sizing rep comes to your house and measures you, shows fabric samples, and then comes back with finished clothes for final fitting.

    Actually going to a store and having to disrobe in a changing room, interact with other people and have strangers around you isn't what people with real money do. There may be some stores that are far from home or impractical for personal shoppers, so in that case, you pack up your entourage, rent a few suites at the Plaza and have stuff brought to your room.

    1. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In general that's true. But, Prada makes shoes and handbags. Chick shopping-excursion stuff. I would venture that people who buy that stuff might actually want to shop there.

      I speak as a chick who likes shoe shopping.

    2. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by Animats · · Score: 1

      Fifty years ago, in the heyday of the great department stores, yes. But high-end retail is too fragmented now. Today, it's the other way round. People hire personal shoppers to go out and do their shopping for them. They're called "personal shoppers" in NY and "stylists" in LA. Much more convenient than scheduling visits from suppliers.

    3. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by zulux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the very wealthy send personal shoppers to stores and accept/reject the new clothing in their own homes.

      This is certainly true... but the're a class of rich people who wear crap like you and me.

      Bill Gates and Warren Bruffet wear horable clothing. I've seen nicer suits at the local Goodwill than those two wear.

      My version of personal shopper what lets me get clothing while still in my home: Logging into Sears.com and picking out some no-press shirts and slacks, the off to JCPenny.com for socks, and underware. Then REI.com for outdoor clothing and then to BrooksBrothers.com for a suit.

      All delivered to me in a week.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    4. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by ragnar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone should read "The Millionaire Mind" or "The Millionaire Next Door" by the same author to get a fair impression of the wealthy in America. Based on what I've read, I wouldn't be at all surprised if most people who shop at Prada are not wealthy, as measured by net worth. The ability to spend doesn't make a person rich, but rather the discipline to accumulate wealth and live below one's means. Of course, there are some filthy rich persons who can't possibly spend all they have, but they are an anomaly.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    5. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by slumped · · Score: 1
      Bill Gates and Warren Bruffet wear horable clothing.

      Hmm, the typo makes it hard to see what you're saying, but I think I get it.

      Yes, they do both pimp out suits....

    6. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by swb · · Score: 1

      But as a chick who like shopping, can you buy one of everything in the Prada store in three different sizes and not worry about your credit line?

      I mean, we're talking about people who don't drive not because they don't want to but because they've never HAD to..

    7. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      "Bill Gates and Warren Bruffet wear horable clothing. I've seen nicer suits at the local Goodwill than those two wear."

      I heard Buffett speak recently, and as he put it "I buy expensive suits, and somehow make them _look_ cheap." It's not his wallet, it's his posture.

    8. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by swb · · Score: 1

      It's true that there are a lot of people that can be referred to as "savings millionaires"; those who have lived below their means, saved and invested well.

      Many that I've known that fit this category also got lucky with investments or had that extra $25k from their grandparents or whatever that gave them that very early leg up to invest when the rest of us were paying rent in college, paying student loans or something else that sapped our ability to invest at that critical young age when the payoff is the greatest.

      Some also live unusually frugal lives that, frankly, aren't terribly compatible with normal social interaction. I can think of two guys that have a ton of money through frugal living, but who also have little social life, no girlfriends or wives, and lifestyles that are generally incompatible with any of those things.

      Overall, I wouldn't count either these kinds of people or the flashy nouveau rich as really "rich"; I'd only count people that have had at least a generation significant financial wealth.

    9. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by ragnar · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that it helps to have a little financial "injection", but 80% of millionaires became wealthy in one generation and only 10% of them inherited any wealth. This data is from "The Millionaire Mind". There are some who are compulsive savers and don't enjoy their money, but I suppose their head rests easy on the pillow having the wealth.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    10. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by swb · · Score: 1

      What counts as inherited wealth, though? Is it cash from one's parents in excess of a certain amount or is it any amount? Does it include gifts or other familial support?

      I knew kids in college who got everything "paid for" by their parents, including a car of some sort. During college and after I "lost" around $20k in investable money because I had to use my earnings to support myself, buy a shitty car (that broke, costing more money), pay for student loans -- things that other people I knew didn't pay for. Some of them used their investable income wisely and bought houses at age 23 and now sitting far prettier than others, but some pissed it away on clothes and bullshit and never took advantage of it except to live at a higher lifestyle.

      I guess my point is that not all "head starts" are inheritence or even clearly claimable as inheritence, but they're advantages that most people didn't have and they can lead to $200k or more gains in net worth by age 40 or even earlier. Couple that with frugal living until age 35, and you could be a "working millionaire" by age 45.

    11. Re:Nouveau rich vs. real rich by neonstz · · Score: 1

      Maybe Bill Gates is using Clippy as a personal clothing assistant?

  33. In other news , House Burglars rejoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    now burglars can just point an antenna at a house and instantly calculate the value of its owners goods and wether its worth robbing or killing the occupants for the contents

    1. Re:In other news , House Burglars rejoice by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to decide if this is good or not. On the one hand, any burgler who sees what I have will start replacing all the junk I have with something that works. On the other hand I'd loose bragging rights when I no longer have a 386 as a critical machine on my network. Not to mention the loss of laughs when someone sits on a chair wrong, or ....

  34. tiered service by fermion · · Score: 1
    The best use for this might be tiered service. Someone like me, who tends to get stuff of the sales racks at boutiques, can be ignored or given a junior. If I need assistance, I can ask. OTOH, some of my acquaintances, who can afford the current designs, and like the attention, will get accosted by the assistants in need of a real commission.

    Of course, the point is moot as all my Prada cards remain secreted in a wooden box at home.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  35. Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The dressing rooms also contain a video-based "Magic Mirror" which allows a customer to see an image of their back. As the customer begins to turn in front of the mirror the image becomes delayed, allowing the customer to view themselves in slow motion from all angles."

    I'm tempted to go to Prada just to see the "mirror." For it to be a convincing substitute, you'd want a full length screen of some sort. Hard to believe thay've managed that so what exactly are you looking at when you look at the "mirror?"

    Speaking of mirrors, an old girlfriend loved the mirror in my apartment because for some reason it flattered her coloring - she just looked better in the mirror than she actually did. I can see the "magic mirror" playing games of that sort as well - hiding blemishes, slimming the wearer etc.

    1. Re:Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Speaking of mirrors, an old girlfriend loved the mirror in my apartment because for some reason it flattered her coloring - she just looked better in the mirror than she actually did. I can see the "magic mirror" playing games of that sort as well - hiding blemishes, slimming the wearer etc.
      Well, in Futurama, when Fry goes to buy some underwear and tries it on, the mirror returns an image of a muscular, athletic guy...
    2. Re:Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by pontifier · · Score: 2, Funny

      -objects in mirror are less attractive than they appear-

      --
      -John Fenley
    3. Re:Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woohoo! My second (Score:-1, Troll) in as many days. I'm on a (t)roll. But seriously, who uses the word coloring to describe a person?

    4. Re:Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
      Yeah, she was human alright.

      I'm not quite sure how to describe it. Her cheeks looked a little rosier and her overall color was a bit "warmer." It was probably a result of the way the rest of the apartment colors interacted with her reflection to give the effect but the color shift was noticable. The odd thing is the mirror didn't seem to affect my skin color or other girlfriend's color - it just worked on her. She loved that mirror, or at least its effect.

      Fwiw, we're both Caucasian.

    5. Re:Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "an old girlfriend loved the mirror in my apartment because for some reason it flattered her coloring - she just looked better in the mirror than she actually did."

      Emphasis Mine.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:Forget the rfid - what's with the mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women use coloring to figure out what clothing looks good on a person.

  36. Personal Security risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does ne1 else see this RFID stuff as a personal security risk?

    I mean they are even planning on putting them in banknotes.

    Drive by scanning anyone?

  37. Customizing the cash register by gentlewizard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've often thought that when you go into a fast food place (for example), the cash register should customize itself to your preferred menu items. You should be able to say, "I'd like my #6, please" and not have to say, "Big Breakfast, no hash browns, add a side of bacon, medium Diet Coke", and then later have to explain what they did wrong.

    It would clearly save money for the retailer, as the ordering process would be quicker and more accurate. It would improve the customer "experience" too.

    Instead of having the merchant suggest these items based on your past buying habits (intrusive), you could go to their website to set up your custom choices (say up to 6) and change them as often as you want. The clerks don't need to deal with the fact that everyone's choices are different, as the keys themselves change meaning when your RFID walks up to the register.

    1. Re:Customizing the cash register by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They already have that technology!

      There's a little deli around the corner that I eat at once or twice a week.

      When I go in, the girl says "Hi, steak and cheese lunch with everything to go, right?" And I say "yep". Usually she has it rung up and the cook has it on the griddle before I even make it to the counter.

      Sometimes I say "no", and she says "oh, general tso's chicken with fried rice then, right?" being as thats the other thing I get sometimes.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Customizing the cash register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be able to say, "I'd like my #6, please" and not have to say, "Big Breakfast, no hash browns, add a side of bacon, medium Diet Coke"

      Extra bacon and a diet Coke? Mmm, sounds healthy.

      So, are you past the magic 300 pound mark yet?

    3. Re:Customizing the cash register by gentlewizard · · Score: 1

      I've got one like that too - but then somebody leaves and I have to train 'em all over again!

      But I hear what you're saying: of course having real human interactions are better. It not only is less artificial than a technology-based solution, but it lets you treat the server like a real person too instead of a commodity.

      I think we can do both; we can use the technology to help people learn our preferences. If we're a regular, they'll catch on.

    4. Re:Customizing the cash register by gentlewizard · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is, if you're low carb; I've lost 40 lb. over the course of a year ordering my #6 as part of an overall eating plan. :-)

  38. It's not the RFID that unnerves me about this. by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We've got a few good shops in town where the employees are friendly and the owners have a shift behind the counter with everybody else. They don't need loyalty cards, because they know most of their customers by name and the working environment and pay are good enough that they aren't rotating workers every couple of weeks.

    The connection there is real. Now people aim to replace that with a wire in a piece of plastic, just as they're replacing living wage jobs with permatemp spots or part time people working close to full time schedules. If you think the negative part of this story is RFID, which is just brand new fuel for the paranoid that'll in actual practice do more to save money than invade privacy, think again; it's about subjugating another fulfilling business practice to a cookie-cutter scheme that anybody who can fog a mirror can perform.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:It's not the RFID that unnerves me about this. by randyest · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's great -- we need more shops like that, not fewer. I'm touched and moved by that sort of small, mom & pop, know everyone by name and face service. Plus, that's much better than having to carry the card around (I have too many already).

      I just can't wait until we figure out a way to use technology to enhance the storage and recall capacity of those kind owners' brains so that we can scale their service up to work in actual civilizations, you know, like cities with more than a few thousand customer for them to remember? And, of course, link them all up so that when I shop at the store owned by their clones in another city, they still recognize me and give me that warm down-home service.

      So, I say scrap all this development of ways to give me better service via technology and computers! Instead, we should work on ways to genetically modify and enhance the mental capabilities of the existing clerks and tellers so that they are just as convenient and useful even in large-scale settings, you know? That way, they get to keep thier menial, easily-automated jobs wth the relatively minor inconvenience of some minor genetic enhancedments. I'm sure you'd agree that's far more desireable than having to learn to adapt and overcome or retrain in a new skill or occupation.

      Heck, I'm sure I don't have to tell you that nothing slows down evolution like removing all trace of pressures to adapt, and that's what we need: Less evolution and progress! More stagnation! W00t!

      --
      everything in moderation
  39. Tax the rich by supertbone · · Score: 0

    I thought it was:

    1. Tax the rich
    2. ???
    3. Profit

  40. No thanks! by geoffeg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see/hear it now. You walk in the store and this kind of thing happens:

    "Hello, Mr. Jackson. How do you like that pair of cotton boys underwear you bought last week?"
    or
    "Hello, Mr. Clinton. Are you back for another blue dress?"
    or
    "Hi, Mr. Timberlake. Looking for another one of those fabulous snap-apart bustiers?"

    I don't think this idea will last very long..

    Geoffeg

  41. Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and who on /. isn't?

    Yeah. 'who' is pretty sad right now.

  42. ... Exposure by Kyont · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article, the changing rooms are made of clear glass that goes opaque when you and your RFID tag enter. "Once inside, the customer can switch the doors back to transparent at the touch of a switch, exposing themselves to onlookers waiting outside the room."

    Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

    --
    You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    1. Re:... Exposure by happyfrogcow · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the article, the changing rooms are made of clear glass that goes opaque when you and your RFID tag enter. "Once inside, the customer can switch the doors back to transparent at the touch of a switch, exposing themselves to onlookers waiting outside the room."

      Are you thinking what I'm thinking?


      I think so Brain, but why would gerbils need RFID tags?

    2. Re:... Exposure by Silik · · Score: 1

      To make changing rooms go opaque, of course. I think the better question is why gerbils need to use changing rooms.

    3. Re:... Exposure by andfarm · · Score: 1
      *bonks happyfrogcow*

      Narf!

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    4. Re:... Exposure by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, this technology would let them cross reference your customer purchasing history with that of a network of stores, such as Radio Shack and enable the security to know when people like you enter the store, thus stopping the rich, beautiful, sexually carnivorous girls from ever having to deal with you.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  43. Might not be bad... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    When you encounter a saleswoman, her handheld computer brings up your tastes, buying history, vital statistics and personalized suggestions from in-stock and coming inventory;

    One hopes it would bring up the fact that I stuffed the last three "helpful" sales people into the nearest wastebin for bothering me. Hey, I'd pay a couple pennies extra for that.

    the handhelds also place orders and book change rooms.

    They book change rooms? What are people doing in there? Having high tea? Holding a seance? Reading SCO legal documants?

    I'm guessing this isn't coming to Wal*Mart's changerooms when they implement RFID.

    I thought WalMart's changeroom were still under FEMA disaster quarantine? Eh, maybe that was something else...

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Might not be bad... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      They book change rooms? What are people doing in there? Having high tea? Holding a seance? Reading SCO legal documants?

      I had my birthday party in a Prada changing room, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  44. You mean recession? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    ..throughout the recent cyclical downturn

    It's called a recession. And it's led to a loss of 2.6 million jobs (which makes W the first Pres since Herbert Hoover to have a net loss of jobs during his term). And despite the uncertain signs of economic upturn and the ridiculous projections of job growth from the White House, jobs continue to be lost.

    And the W solution: permanent tax cuts for those making more than $200,000. And since the Congressional Budget Office says that 36% of the record deficit comes from the Bush tax cuts, 31% from spending on defense and security and the rest from economic slowdown, there are reasons why people might be ...irked, shall we say.

    1. Re:You mean recession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      > which makes W the first Pres since Herbert Hoover to have a
      > net loss of jobs during his term

      Liberal myth. Any job loss would be run-on from Clinton's bungling. Witness the recent massive job creation due to Bush house policies.

      Your not fooling anyone.

    2. Re:You mean recession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your not fooling anyone.

      Correction, Huckleberry. Your heroes are no longer fooling anyone. Reasonable people are now catching on to the flood of lies and misdirection coming from the right. Your day in the sun is almost over. The good news is that you're going to have time to take some grammar lessons.

      Witness the recent massive job creation due to Bush house policies.

      The policies of the current regime have been superb for creating demand in the defense industry - we now need it more than ever. But you can't have a healthy economy based solely building weapons.

    3. Re:You mean recession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The policies of the current regime have been superb for creating demand in the defense industry

      More so in the offence industry.

  45. Drawback: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mirror adds 10 lbs.

  46. I'm Totally Sure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, I'm totally sure you could, like, guess a TAG ID that would fit into their totally trendy numbering SCHEME and CRC check! You've been, like, hanging out way too long at the Mall! DUH!

    Anyway, PRADA is so NOT COOL ANYMORE, it's like the Paris Hilton of fashion. OMIGOD!

  47. walmart changeroom rfid reader? you bet! by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The changing room is a prime location for theft. I'll bet you that the FIRST place a rfid reader is placed if the fitting/changeing rooms to nail the scumbags that go in with 5 items and leave with 4.

    have it alert the attendant that the person just entered the fitting room with 3 shirts and a portable DVD player or other non clothing item, or handed back less items than they entered with.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  48. Well, seeing as you have to sign up for the card.. by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

    i'm sure they have you sign waivers and disclaimers that you don't care about that...

  49. doesn't have to be isolated or small... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you lived in a small, isolated, town, the shopkeepers there would know far more about you than these corporations will ever be able to milk from audit trails.

    Small, isolated? Try 1 block from downtown financial center. Not a high-end clothes shop, either. No sir- a deli.

    I started stopping there for a egg/bacon/cheese bagel, and on the second day- the woman looked at me and said "egg bacon cheese bagel, and an OJ, right?" Third day, i got a warm greeting and I knew she still remembered. This isn't a small place- it's directly across from South Station, and opposite One Financial Center. A lot of construction-guy types from the Big Dig and area renovation go there, as do limo drivers and local/state cops. The place is almost always bustling, and I've seen other customers get the same recognition.

    All of this just goes to show that if you want to be successful, it's all about establishing a relationship with the customer, and that's the job of the sales person. It can't be automated, because if the customer sniffs that- they suddenly realize they're just a sheep of hundreds and they're not impressed in the slightest beyond the gee-gaw gadgetry of it all.

    Who do you think will establish more long-term relationships at a high-end clothier- the salesperson with this palm thingy who does the in-person version of "let me pull up your records", or the salesperson who turns around, recognizes an important customer, and says, "Ah, Mr. Jones! Good to see you again. How did the alterations work on your dinner jacket?"

    1. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Funny
      Who do you think will establish more long-term relationships at a high-end clothier- the salesperson with this palm thingy who does the in-person version of "let me pull up your records", or the salesperson who turns around, recognizes an important customer, and says, "Ah, Mr. Jones! Good to see you again. How did the alterations work on your dinner jacket?"

      They'll eventually have androids to do that. C3PO was amusing in the SW movies, but I bet he would get annoying fast.

    2. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Who do you think will establish more long-term relationships at a high-end clothier- the salesperson with this palm thingy who does the in-person version of "let me pull up your records", or the salesperson who turns around, recognizes an important customer, and says, "Ah, Mr. Jones! Good to see you again. How did the alterations work on your dinner jacket?"


      But with the gadget behind the false front of his desk, the clerk can read

      Customer entering: B. F. Jones
      Last purchase: Alterations to dinner jacket 1/29/04 $84.59+tax
      Total purchases: $9,259
      Status: Platinum/All Courtesy to be Afforded


      and take it from there, even if it's his first day on the job.
    3. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      All of this just goes to show that if you want to be successful, it's all about establishing a relationship with the customer, and that's the job of the sales person

      Exactly true. Summers in college I worked on the floor at a high-end men's specialty clothing store in NYC taking customers' clothes and credit cards from the salesmen to the cash registers hidden in the back (customers' eyes were not to be sullied by the sight of a plebian cash register, I guess!) and bringing them back out packaged and ready. Even though as temps we were just one step up from the minimum wage employees that did a similar job, we were expected to dress in a suit and tie and had to go through a "training session" which basically consisted of "the customer is always right" and emphasized that they stressed customer service. The kind of people who drop $5,000 on a suit of clothes without a second thought expect that kind of service and usually get it. It means lots of repeat business.

      Same thing happens now. At work, a small group of us used to go to lunch to the same two restaurants 4-5 times a week. It got to the point where the owner or waitresses would see us come in the door and usher us to our favorite table with the condiments and free appetizers we liked ready and waiting. They liked the repeat business (sometimes we brought in large groups) and did their best to please us; we liked the service so we tipped very well and kept coming back. Works both ways.
    4. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by japhmi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It doesn't even need to be high-scale - repeat business is good business.

      Way back when I was in High School, my group of friends frequented the same dinner-type place quite often. We had 2 rules: Buy something (even just coffee), and leave a minimum $1 tip (even for the $.99 coffee).

      In a short period of time, we were given a lot more lee-way when we made a lot of noise talking (as young kids will) than other high schoolers who went to the same place.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    5. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      agreed - I go to a coffee cart in Manhattan - If I DON'T want my usual, I have to stop them ASAP. Most morning the transaction is more like "Good Morning, how are you?" "Fine and you?" "OK - had to work late yesterday."

      Netx morning it would be "You have to work late last night too?" "Nope, go home to the kids"

      PLACE my order? Nope. And this is with a guy who serves a new customer ever 30 seconds or so from 6:00am till about 10:00am

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    6. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A chinese place just came under new management a month ago. I visited once for dinner, and the manager was thrilled. I walk by on my way home, and she waves to me. I took my G/F there last night and she was even happier.

      I know that they can't be doing well. The previous owners were horrible, and the place was greasy and dirty and the food was crap that I only ate out of desparation. The ingredients alone for my meal last night must have cut their profit margin very thin, and it was one of the best meals I've ever had. Ever.

      I'm going to go back as much as I can afford on a college kid's budget, because the food is amazing, and the service is friendly. I hope they make it.

      On the other hand, Panda Express pissed me off a few weeks ago. The same manager has seen me for 4 years now, and even took the trouble to remember my name and preferences. But one time somebody made an error in my favor (gave me an extra egg roll) and she had to take my food back and chew me and the server out. I'm not going back.

      The point, though, is that it's all about service, and if they sell a quality product and make me feel like I'm a human, then that counts tenfold.

    7. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cindy knows everyone! As someone who can see the deli from his window (and no, her name is NOT the female name in the name of the deli), she is great. We regularly order food from there and they never fail to remember any one of us. Enjoy the service there; it is rare in today's world!

      -Someone who loves the Deli as well

    8. Re:doesn't have to be isolated or small... by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1

      That so beats my too-often experience of having to beg someone to sell me their service or product!

  50. Prada? by wbattestilli · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm too old and/or an uber-geek and/or married, but I have no idea what "Prada" is.

    I'm even clueless relative to a bunch of people who read slashdot. Good thing that my wife dresses me. Otherwise I people would probably laugh at me in public.

    Scary.

    1. Re:Prada? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad. A bunch of HS kids snapped a photo of my head in an Applebee's about a month back because my hair was such a mess that it was apparently one of the funniest things they'd ever seen.

      If I walked in a Prada, security would probably execute me in the lobby....

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  51. Getting some perspective here... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    Ummm, who's "Prada"? What cards? I keep my (US) driver's license and ATM card on me, nothing else. If somebody wants more than that, they can show it up front, and show why. Please somebody tell me that *cash* isn't good enough..

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:Getting some perspective here... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Please somebody tell me that *cash* isn't good enough

      At Prada? No. I seriously doubt they deal in cash at all any more. When a simple shirt costs $200, you don't get many cash sales.

  52. No, if you had the money you . . . by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    probably wouldn't buy Prada stuff.

    I'm not rich or anything, but I don't mind paying extra for items of good quality. Prada just overcharges based on the name - plain and simple.

    $770 for a Track Suit that's no better than Nike, et al., abso-F*ck1n-lutely ridiculous.

  53. Wal-Mart vs. Prada by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    I'm guessing this isn't coming to Wal*Mart's changerooms when they implement RFID.

    The lack of pushy salespeople who know everything about me is all the more reason to stick with Wal-Mart.

    (Though actually, I make a point of going to locally-owned businesses who charge a little more so they can pay their employees more, rather than go to the W'art.)

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  54. Re:Why all the resentment for those of us with mon by haizi_23 · · Score: 1

    'cause you'll be first against the wall when the revolution comes, scum!

    just kidding

  55. Tagging the rich by br3itain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why can't we just tag rich people the old fashioned way, by knocking them out with tranquilizer darts and stapling plastic bracelets around their ankles while they're asleep? It works pretty well with grizzlies...

  56. Behavioral Tracking by ArcheMeaty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if significant numbers of people could be induced to (unwittingly) ingest RFID chips? We could scan pedestrian traffic choke-points for consumers of anything that is swallowed whole - club drugs, over the counter pharmaceuticals, happy hour tacos... The mind reels.

  57. Forget hacking the tags; hack the mirror! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Get some good real-time video processing stuff... and hack into the mirror system, so that, for example, a person would see her own likeness slowly take on a disturbing sneer, with red glowing eyes. Watch them bolt for the door in a panic!

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  58. Nope, she told it to them for free. by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ye know not the power of small-town gossip.

  59. I think that's the big issue -- by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not what you know they're doing with it -- it's what you don't know about that they're doing with it.

    For instance, I heard that Giant [the grocery store chain] made more last year selling data about their customers than in profits from items sold in their store. In some ways, this is good to the customers, as it allows them to find an alternate revenue stream, and keep their prices down.

    But it's not spun like that. Hell, in this case, it's not even mentioned, so in my opinion, it's worse than them placing ads on shopping carts. And I've personally been creeped out when they scanned my card before ringing up any merchandice, and of the four coupons their system spat out -- three of them were items I had on the conveyor belt, that had yet to be rung up.

    Of course, I didn't like their spin on the cards, either. Probably because they were behind the curve, when I had who knows how many cards for every other business. [book store frequent buyers card, air lines, a couple other grocery stores]. At least with Safeway, the card was an alternative to needing to clip coupons from the book they'd send you each month. And with Kroger, they gave you a little keychain thing, and they guaranteed postage if it was dropped in a mailbox, so they could return your keys to you.

    But I'm still not convinced that your health insurance won't go up if you start buying medical supplies and scan your card in. [or cigarettes]

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:I think that's the big issue -- by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1
      For instance, I heard that Giant [the grocery store chain] made more last year selling data about their customers than in profits from items sold in their store. In some ways, this is good to the customers, as it allows them to find an alternate revenue stream, and keep their prices down.

      Is that really true? I googled and couldn't find any reference to that. If it is, I wonder if Safeway does the same thing....

    2. Re:I think that's the big issue -- by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      I heard that Giant [the grocery store chain] made more last year selling data about their customers than in profits from items sold in their store.

      That's fine. As far as they know I'm one of my dead friends and I'm living on the 3rd floor in a condemned building in the center of the city somewhere. On top of that, I share the card with one of my other friends' entire family.

      I should have generated some rather interesting marketing data by now.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    3. Re:I think that's the big issue -- by uxo · · Score: 1
      For instance, I heard that Giant [the grocery store chain] made more last year selling data about their customers than in profits from items sold in their store. In some ways, this is good to the customers, as it allows them to find an alternate revenue stream, and keep their prices down.

      I don't know how much they could make selling customer information, but Giant Eagle's 2003 profits were $4.7 billion.
    4. Re:I think that's the big issue -- by Duck+of+Death · · Score: 1

      Actually, their sales were 4.7 billion, not thier profits. We don't know their profits because Giant is privately held, but if their ratio of sales to profits is the same as other grocery chains, then we can assume Giant's profits were about 110 million (that's right, the store has to sell you over $40 in groceries in order to make a $1 profit).

      I sincerely doubt that 55 million of that was from the selling of personal information. I would have no trouble believing that Giant has a higher profit margin on the info vs. the groceries, but not that the info brings in more money overall.

      Giant is private, so we can't look through their financials for the "Evil Deeds: Selling of Personal Info" line item. But their are plenty of public grocery chains out there. Go have a look and see if anything stands out.

      --
      "Can I finish? Can I finish? ... Okay, I'm finished."
  60. Re:And the thing about Prada that is most positive by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mwaha.

    For those of you that aren't Canadian, or have never heard of Radio Free Vestibule (I think they're just called 'Vestibule' now), this comes from one of their sketches. Zalgon-26 McGee's fine clothing!

  61. the formula by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Steal RFID database, buy scanner.
    2. Park van in front of exclusive boutique.
    3. Wait for mark with lots of money, then snatch them.
    4. ??????? (demand ransom, or make Paris Hilton video)
    5. Profit!

  62. Exposing themselves to onlookers by richmaine · · Score: 3, Funny

    I liked the part about how the "customer can switch the doors back to transparent at the touch of a switch, exposing themselves to onlookers waiting outside the room."

  63. Re:And the thing about Prada that is most positive by Icculus · · Score: 1

    Oh look! It's Melt Disney Vorld!

  64. Re:No, if you had the money you . . . by mesach · · Score: 1

    I find it funny that you complain about the $770 track suit, but dont mention the $170 Sleeveless T-Shirt!

    --
    moo.
  65. This is the last thing we need.... by deanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RFID tags are cool and all, and I think they're destined to have a lot of great apps, but this is NOT one of them.

    Never mind the privacy concerns, lots of people will take up that charge. Stores will end up doing custom pricing with this. Wouldn't be hard to say, "Hey, this guy bought a big screen TV last time... when he checks this price, it'll be full retail". Of course, they might offer a discount at times, but I seriously doubt it.

    Another thing, the last thing I want to do is to have to chase down a salesperson to find an item just because they're glad-handing a previous customer. Worse, I don't want salespeople slithering up and acting like a best friend just because they happen to have your info.

  66. mental slavery by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Being rich and being tracked is something of a resonant cycle. Frequent flyer miles, credit card bonuses, all manner of marketing perks and tie-ins, cobranded water, corporate discounts. Of course, the truly rich have personal shopper proxies, and themselves are not truly tracked - they can afford their privacy. But the "pretty rich", like the 90-98%ile Americans, are on the marketers' radar every minute, induced to report with a steady flow of "freebies" to gain their brand affinity and detect their tastemaking activities. The result is often a global disneyworld, where the only "choices" are designed by the marketers, and the "real world" never peeks through.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  67. Winona Has One Of These for Saks by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    If you're a frequent Prada shopper (and who on /. isn't?), the loyalty card in your wallet or purse contains a RFID tag that announces your arrival in the store...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  68. Re:And the thing about Prada that is most positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've SEEN IT, OKAY?

  69. Racial Minority? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    So you'r saying that you are, in fact, a white person? They are the true minority, when looking at global data.

  70. Silly by Dotnaught · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're a Gates or a Getty and you walk into the Prada store, you'll expect damn good service with or without an RFID tag. Stores with massive margins don't need technology; they need fawning, supplicant employees who can flatter customers into coughing up $6000 for a handbag.

  71. Cool! by maloi · · Score: 1

    Bitch and moan all you like, but that's better than having a salesperson who's clueless about what you want try to help you. And if you don't like it, don't get the loyalty card. Easy.

  72. Re:And the thing about Prada that is most positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i don't want to go to toronto, either.

  73. Strange notion of service by Espen · · Score: 1

    So, what they are basically admitting is that they are unwilling to hire staff capable of knowing a) what's going on in their own stores, and b) remembering the faces and histories of their top customers. That sounds pretty cheap to me. A preferred customer in a high end store is going to be much impressed by being served by the same person each time they shop, who already knows their tastes and needs, and can provide what used to be known as that 'personal touch. What you get with this is new face staring a screen each time you enter a store which screams 'clueless' and 'newly hired' rather than exceptional service.

    1. Re:Strange notion of service by ragnar · · Score: 1

      Good point. I don't mean this to brag, but when I go to Nordstrom's to purchase clothing (a few times a year) I call ahead of time to see if the salesman I've dealt with will be there. He remembers me and knows my tastes, which is worth a lot to me. I wouldn't be fooled by another salesperson using my name any more than I'm convinced that the Wal*mart clerk appreciates my business when they read off my receipt and say "thank you Mr. [last name]."

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
  74. Damn those Wal*Mart execs by Greedo · · Score: 1

    . So the only effect on the customer at all is the possibility of Wal-Mart dropping prices even more as their inventory process becomes more streamlined. ... which will lure even more consumers away from mom and pop stores like Prada!

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  75. Re:Why all the resentment for those of us with mon by kfg · · Score: 1

    I, for one, would not sneer at your money. I might, however, sneer at your behaviour, which might well include what you do with your money.

    Conversely I have had plenty of people with money sneer at my poverty, even though it was my goal and I have worked hard to achieve and maintain it. Since I do with skills and labor what other people do with money (growing food rather than buying it, for instance), this, in effect, is sneering at what I do with my money as well.

    Although I find that people with money these days have a great deal of trouble grasping the concept that working an hour to save a hundred bucks is the same as working an hour to "earn" a hundred bucks. And yet I am often accounted a "bum" for productive labor because that labor wasn't spent in servitude to another.

    So, why do you monied sorts sneer at my hand made clothes without designer tags?

    My clothes are actually hand tailored, extremely rare, designer originals.

    And they fit better than yours if you bought yours off the shelf.

    So, I won't sneer at your money if you don't sneer at my lack of it. Deal?

    KFG

  76. Re:Why all the resentment for those of us with mon by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    It's not your money, it's the attitude that comes with it.

    You having no issues throughout the recent cyclical downtown definitely is a result of your hard work but also due to a bit of good luck as well. What if you worked at Enron?

    Rich people take all of the credit for being rich. Poor people take none of the blame for being poor.

  77. pretty funny by my+sig+is+bigger+tha · · Score: 1

    if it's your wife using your card - then she'd know your preferences too...

  78. Sorry AC: 4 year term is the playing field by burgburgburg · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Every President (Republican and Democrat) since Herbert Hoover has had a net gain of jobs over their 4 year terms of office. W is set to be the first one since then to fail this test.

    And let me get this straight: 4 years of being in charge and you're still trying to blame it on Clinton? Seems W isn't the only delusional one.

    1. Re:Sorry AC: 4 year term is the playing field by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Actually, Clinton is at fault for allowing the recession by not better managing the economy during his presidency. However, Dubba is also at fault becuase not only is his economic plan not working (possibly because he is way out of touch with such basic concepts as reality) but because it most likely is making matters worse. Tax cuts for the wealthy are contributing to record budget deficits, expensive wars that were based on his own opinions when the intel indicated those opinions were wrong make those deficits even worse, and now we get the message that outsourcing is not only not bad for the average american but is a thing to be encouraged (overall economically that might be a good thing but just because it is good for the economy does not make it good for the american people.) Even us republicans are starting to turn against him...

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re:Sorry AC: 4 year term is the playing field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even us republicans are starting to turn against him

      It is heartening to hear that the moderates are getting uncomfortable with the neo-con extremists that have co-opted the party.

  79. So this is how they'll do it by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When "the people" don't like RFID, they decide to use class envy to get them to change their minds.

    Instead of being something that can be used to track us and invade our privacy, they'll frame RFID as a perk that only the rich deserve. This'll make people DEMAND it in everything.

    Not for me, thanks anyway.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  80. Not only for the rich by serutan · · Score: 1

    This is not an elitist thing. If wealthier people are the only ones receiving this personalized treatment right now, it's only because high-end stores are the early adopters. Retailers do whatever they can afford to increase sales, and they know that treating Joe Sixpack like a big spender can induce him act like one. Personalization is already happening. When I use my Safeway card, the clerks always look at the receipt and thank my by name. As RFID costs come down, expect lower-end businesses to think of creative ways to make you feel elite.

  81. Putting the Minority in Minority Report by gelfling · · Score: 1

    "Good afternoon Mr. Yakmura."

  82. I guess that... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    you have never shopped at Prada. I wouldn't call some of the Prada girls cold!

  83. I'd mod this up. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    if I could.

    The reason why the rich sneer at you is because if everyone grew their own food and made their own clothes then there would be no capitalism and they wouldn't be so rich.

    1. Re:I'd mod this up. by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not so. In fact I'm a capitalist myself. I have to be to maintain my "poor" lifestyle, as I'm no "survivalist."

      For instance, I may make my own clothes but I do not make my own fabric. That, on the whole, is robotic meanial labor better done by a machine than some poor bastard of a worker who's going to die from breathing cotton fibers all his short, miserable life.

      That machine requires capital which must be recovered through sales. So I produce some extra food, sell it, and buy my cloth.

      Or I fix someone's computer. My skills are high tech as well as low. I'm no Luddite either.

      I assembled my own computer, but I certainly didn't make the cpu. I bought it. Time-Warner has expended a good deal of capital, and continues to do so, so that I may connect to the internet. I pay them for my connection. Nothing wrong with that.

      I built my bicycle frame, but I certainly didn't make the tubing. Reynolds can do that far better than I could ever hope to dream of doing it. Nor did I make my welding torch.

      No, capitalism isn't harmed by my way of life, although it destroys markets like Prada's, those markets that exist to charge $100 for something that can be had for $20.

      Top down heirarchy is.

      Yes, then most of the rich wouldn't be quite so rich.

      KFG

  84. mod parent up by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering Bananna Republic*(maybe only for petites, I'll have to check) and Land's End*(I think) have free return shipping back, its a no brainer.
    I don't go to malls; the clothes come to me. Thanks Internet!

    Whats scary is that J.Crew not only sent my wife a thank you letter for being a valued customer, but Bananna Republic online sent her a Christmas gift. Me thinks its time to hide those credit cards...

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  85. Re:Tag the Poor by paronomasia5 · · Score: 1

    1. Put RFID tags in salvation army clothers.
    2. Give clothes to homeless
    3. War-drive to round up homeless people for protection during cold winter snap
    4. ????
    5. Heil RFID!

  86. Back in the day... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Store clerks remembered who you were and got to know you on a personal basis, and could do everything this RFID stuff enables total strangers to do for you now. But times have changed and people don't stay in the same job for 40 years and people don't shop at the same place or even live in the same city their whole lives. When that changed, people bemoaned how alienating modernity was.

    Maybe this will start to change now that we have high tech eyes watching our every move.

    But... it's just off-putting that someone you don't know well has all this information about you. I don't care really if my tailor of some decades of acquaintance knows some personal details about me, like my left leg is shorter than my right leg. I worry, though, when that information get collected into a big system and combined with all sorts of other information from who knows where.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Back in the day... by rm007 · · Score: 1

      Store clerks remembered who you were and got to know you on a personal basis, and could do everything this RFID stuff enables total strangers to do for you now.

      Total strangers is the key - back in the *good old days* the clerks had a lot of information about you, but you knew who knew (local gossip notwithstanding), and you probably knew a bit about them. Now we have strangers who pretend to know us and we really can't be sure who has access to the data. Off-putting is right.

      --


      I've finally got around to changing my sig
  87. cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they finally invented cookies for the physical world

  88. RFID tags for fun and profit by al!ethel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if it would be possible to set up a home inventory using RFID tags. Put one on everything you own, then use trianglation to map out the position of everything in your home. Loose your keys? No problem. Just fire up the handheld, connect to the server, run an RF ping and run a search on "keys". I don't fear the misuse of RFID (well, too much) but I don't think many of the people using them really have an idea of how much fun they could be!

    --
    If I could get a firm grip on reality, I'd choke it...
  89. Mirror Mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Magic Mirror wall,
    Your circuitry hacked by spring,
    Best new voyeur site.

    -~-

    Magic Mirror on the wall,
    Who's got the biggest boobs of all?
    Magic Mirror responds: "Why, PradaPorn dot com, hottest voyeur site since fall!"

  90. rfid blockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There seems to be many people wondering if they can make an antenna that transmit rfid signals. Look up rfid blockers on google. They have been developed.

  91. Sorry for the stupid question but... by slipgun · · Score: 1

    ... who, or what, is Prada?

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    1. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by hesiod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > what, is Prada?

      A clothing line for people who think they are important, like Gucci. Some people claim they are better quality, while most realize it's a bunch of hooey just to raise the price of a shirt 100x.

    2. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by slipgun · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok. In Britain we've got something similar, it's called Conrad. A way for the very rich to distinguish themselves from everyone else, now that many people can afford to drink wine/eat out regularly/buy their own house, etc etc.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    3. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by slipgun · · Score: 1

      Oops, that should be Conran. Conrad [Black] is a man who used to own a line of newspapers. Probably the type who would shop in Conran or Prada.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    4. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Conrad [Black] is a man who used to own a line of newspapers.

      He lost his papers? I went to university in Canada, and that thought fills me with glee.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by fingusernames · · Score: 1

      They were sponsors for the Italian America's Cup racing team, which did quite well... and I think they sell some clothes/accessories too.

      Larry

    6. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      You might enjoy this , then.

      The CBC has a (superhumanly polite) profile of Conrad Black here.

    7. Re:Sorry for the stupid question but... by will_die · · Score: 1

      Prada has stored in the UK; they have stored in most major cities in Europe, just look for the high end/tourist shopping areas.
      The one in London is on Sloane St.

  92. Just pay cash by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    I almost always do.

    I refuse these airmail cards - So, if you can collect my personal info and track shopping habits, I get a 1% refund ... let me think about it ... NO WAY - and pay cash.

    If the 1% refund or the convenience not to run around with 200$ is worth more to you than your privacy, that's YOUR choice.
    So stop bitching about the store tracking you, when it's YOU who made the choice.

    Now, if the shop would refuse to sell you something without scanning a card, THAT would be creepy.

    For very expensive items (1000$+) I still pay with cards as I dont want to take the risk of being robbed while carring tousands of dollars, but if your paranoid, you can pay in cash. (Heck, my mother bougth a new car in cash, but this was because they didnt accepted cards nor checks for large sums, go figure)

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  93. and then .... by hetairoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    and take it from there, even if it's his first day on the job.

    Clerk reads screen, looks up to see two people walking in the door, a man and a woman. Clerk walks over to man and says "Good to see you again Mr. Jones!"

    Girl says "Mr. Jones is my Dad and he gave me his card, this is just the guy I'm banging to piss him off. Now bring me your most expensive purse!"

    It's still better for the clerk to know the customer personally, but yeah, this system is probably a good thing.

    --
    you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    1. Re:and then .... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Interesting use-case.

      To get around the possibility of mistaken identity, the system can show pictures (security camera pictures if nothing else) of the named customer.

      Would also be useful in validating that the RFID belongs to the person carrying it.

      Instead of an expensive biometric analysis system, you use the human operator as a pattern matching device to ensure security.

      Birds, stones, little feathered bodies everywhere.

  94. meh by hetairoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gap already knows I like scantily clad saleswomen .... it's why they won't allow me in the store anymore. :(

    --
    you're all figments of my deranged imagination
  95. Excellent! Now I know who to rob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the tech jobs heading out of the country, I'm sure a high-tech criminal class is sure to rise here in the good old U. S. of A.

    One could loiter outside the store to get a bead on the RFID tags and start gathering raw data. A days work collecting and another disecting would be all that was needed.

    A handheld computer on the streets of New York and the ability to detect a Prada card is all it will take someone to make 10K to 20K in a weekend.

    Next thing you know, they'll start using it in cash. Could you imagine, someone could know exactly how much cash you were carrying at any given time.

  96. Customer -- by MtlDty · · Score: 1

    That does it, I'm never shopping at Prada again!!

    oh, wait...

  97. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When you encounter a saleswoman, her handheld computer brings up your tastes, buying history, vital statistics and personalized suggestions from in-stock and coming inventory


    All that and it doesn't tell her your name?!?

    You gotta wonder where all this 'advanced' tech is taking us, heh.
  98. It's the 'me' thing by DrXym · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    People who shop in upper market designer stores (i.e. assholes) think it's all about 'me! me! me!'. So they'll probably love this technology.


    Their fragile egos will convince them that the staff are fawning with faux familiarty because they're just so wonderful and not because a computer says they're loaded and stupid.

  99. schwa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    michael wrote:
    >
    > the loyalty card in your wallet or purse contains a RFID tag that announces your arrival in
    > the store. When you encounter a saleswoman, her handheld computer brings up your tastes,
    > buying history, vital statistics

    "Stickpeople must not only be persuaded to accept Schwa's total control, they should be conditioned to ask for it by name." --Bill Barker

  100. Re:Messing with their system by Thuktun · · Score: 1

    I've worked with several RFID implementations, and all of the (silicon-based) solutions have decent encryption to prevent "capture" of IDs or other data. Usually a shared-key system -- not unbreakable, of course, but pretty difficult to intercept on the sly.

    If encrypted RFID systems don't include any nonce in the request, repeated in the response, then a replay attack is possible. You don't have to break the encryption at that point, just record and retransmit.

    Humans tend to repeat their mistakes, so it wouldn't surpise me if such a vulnerability showed up.

  101. prada - useless web site by ragnar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although I love good shoes (I'm a recent leather sole convert) I find Prada to be too contemporary for my tastes, but their web site is a joke. I scanned about with my mouse for the magic pixel to let me in, but I don't see it. Maybe it just isn't friendly to safari on the Mac.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
    1. Re:prada - useless web site by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 1

      That might explain things. On a different note, the pictured women are extremely frightening.

    2. Re:prada - useless web site by LMariachi · · Score: 2, Funny

      META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR

    3. Re:prada - useless web site by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      No kidding, the one on the far left IS A MAN BABY!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  102. Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've often thought that when you go into a fast food place (for example), the cash register should customize itself to your preferred menu items.

    Great, so the register automatically knows what I want, big deal. The same moron human beings are still working there, so all RFID will do is let them fuck up my order more efficiently than before, and during the assembly phase instead of the submission phase. And they already fuck up my order just fine now, without RFID.

  103. That works too. by rk · · Score: 1

    My card is actually in the name of "Arthur Dent", who has a nonexistent address and phone number. I was at an SF con some years back and a group of us agreed to do this.

    I'd dearly love to know what Arthur Dent's consumer profile looks like right now. Just trying to stock up on stuff before the Vogon Constructor Fleet arrives, I suppose.

  104. They're already here! by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all you don't entirely need them. I already know for a fact that you read stories on slashdot about RFID tags! I can also surmise that a few of the posters are buying more tinfoil than they would normally need.

    RFIDS? What do you think cookies are? The concept of RFIDs has efectively been on the net for years. And for you tinfoil hat ppl: They have been monitoring us liek rats for years... people have been taken, things have been done to them, now there walking gap advertisements...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  105. This is funny at Safeway. by chadjg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nobody can pronounce my name on the first try without being born to it. The poor clerks at Safeway have enough to do without trying to learn how! Maybe Prada had better put a phonetic spelling in their records.

    This could be really fun at a snob shop like Prada. I now nobody here has signed their loyalty cards as "Frodo Bigbutt," "Billy Bob Gates," or anything like that. let's see the Pradadroid say that out loud! Or would they have the nerve to call BS?

    It would be nice to be rich and have absolutely no shame.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  106. Re:All the items are RFID tagged to, leading to... by SpyPlane · · Score: 1

    From the article: ...enabling the customer to select alternative sizes, colors, fabrics, and styles, or see the garment worn on the PRADA catwalk as slow-motion video clips.

    Just what most women want, to see themselves in the mirror and then a picture of a supermodel wearing the same thing. Talk about a self-esteem builder.

    --
    "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
  107. Who needs sales clerks? by jstave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why bother with a flesh-and-blood sales clerk at all? Hook the reader into a database and a monitor. You can even put a nice smiling emoticon on the monitor for that friendly touch.

  108. Wal*Mart by sryx · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm guessing this isn't coming to Wal*Mart's changerooms when they implement RFID.
    Wal*Mart has changing rooms!? Wow that could have saved me indecent exposure charge from the San Ramon County Police! Now you tell me! : P
    -Jason

  109. Re:Messing with their system by skink1100 · · Score: 1

    > If encrypted RFID systems don't include any nonce in the request, repeated in the response, then a replay attack is possible.

    It's been a couple years, but I'm certain it had a challenge-response authentication system to prevent simulation. I am not a security expert, I just remember reading the specs while studying the api.

    I also remember a story told by the owner of the company about a sales pitch he gave once. A nearby amusement park used an insecure rfid technology to sell access to video games, rides, etc. He walked in with his own reader, copied the "paid in full" transaction code and gave himself a free ride. A high-tech "vacuum-cleaner sales pitch", but effective.

    S

  110. This is how its supposed to be used... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prada has always set the standard in service, and this is exactly how RFID technology should be used, they are veritable poster child for acceptable use of technology.

    For Wal*Mart, however, RFID is used for more sinister purposes. Instead of greeting the customer as they enter and act as personal shoppers, they are using this technology to surreptiously follow people and spy on their habits.

    The ONLY difference between the two approaches is the overtness. The high end retailer will use this in an overt manner, whereas the use of, and the abuse of RFID, lies in the covert manner applied by intrusive big brothers.

    I for one welcome our new, very well dressed (nice shoes) Milanese overlords.

    Go Jeff Markey!

  111. bastards stole my technology... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    I have had this functionality build into my shower for years...my shower is made of clear glass...but when I start having a shower, it goes opaque, or what I like to call "steamy"...once inside, I can switch the shower back to transparent by using what I like to call a "towel"

    I think I may have a case against Prada

    p.s. sorry for the mental imagery guys :)

  112. microwave on "high" for 15 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume that, like a CD, microwaving an RFID tag should permanently disable it. Has anyone tried that?

  113. And it comes with no Sticker Shock--- by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 2, Funny

    Due to price tags that automatically go up in proportion to the amount of your available credit....

  114. YOU'RE QUITE **WHAT!!???** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm quite peculiar with how I like my favourite drink prepared

    oh.

    my.

    fucking.

    god.

    Please tell me you are not THAT asshole!!

  115. Things to think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In response to many of the posts above, this anonymous coward who has worked extensively with supply chain rfid solutions would like to submit the following:

    _ WalMart was testing RFID retail solutions on individual products BEFORE they pulled back from the gillette tag project. See http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/654 /1/2/ for more info and a link to a major newspaper story

    _ Data collected by RFID in the retail environment is pretty inocuous compared to what is already collected. Wheter you use a 'club card' or not, if you've ever payed for a purchase with a credit card there is a name & address associated to your detailed purchases.

    _ RFID tags can't be read by potential theives or evil conmen. The technology as-is is pretty crappy right now, and the range required to read tags small enough to fit on an individual product is within a couple inches. Portals/readers have to be specifically tuned to certin tag formats as well. Suffice to say, unless the 'evil doers' have the ability to hold the actual item -- and the right hardware to read the specific tag, they dont have a shot in hell at reading it. If that doesn't address your concerns, then how about this: newer tags implement self-destructing features, that allow a 'die now' command to be sent when scanning to render them useless -- just to be safe.

    _ RFID tags function poorly around metals and machinery from interference. They're pretty bad around water and paper/wood too.

    _ Everyone touts the Prada store's accomplishments for the past two years. Its old news -- and no one ever mentions that the stuff never works. Go by the store, ask for a demonstration. Watch the employees cross their fingers or laugh. Go on... The Prada store is only functional as a PR piece.

    All of the outcry and reservations about RFID is just plain stupid -- the technology only makes current supply chain tasks easier. The only negative effect on consumer privacy they exert, is detracting attention from the invasive climate THAT ALREADY EXISTS.

  116. real demographic data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a number of studies currently being conducted to take REAL measurements of women in the US, UK and Australia, trying to establish more realistic models for clothes size/proportion standards.

    Having a system that actually tracked fitting information and reported it back anonymously could potentially see better standard fittings for everyone.

    cheers
    Sara
    a Macgrrl in an NT World

  117. 10 kilometer Range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I post anonymously because this was presented at the SOCOM SBIR conference in St. Petersburg yesterday. The president of Sierra Monolithics, Charles Harper, talked about a JSTAR based transponder (which he did not state was passive; but he didn't say it was active either) that they have designed and is in use in the Iraqi theater currently.

    He stated specifically that the U.S. Boeing 707-based Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) working with a RFID transponder system created by Sierra Monolithics has been demonstrated to be readable at a distance of 10 Kilometers (is 10 Megameters ever commonly used?). So technically, this is RFID, similar I believe to the transponders in jet planes that transmit altitude and plane identifier codes in response to radar pings.

  118. And lets link that to a credit check on entering.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the near future for those with RFID "loyalty" cards - (purely hypothetical of course):
    You walk in, the RFID is scanned, a quick credit check is done along with purchase profiles based on credit purchases, and hmm, they direct you to the leather goods, or perhaps ignore you?

  119. glass walls that switch from transparent to .. by shailu · · Score: 1

    one the same site ... Each dressing room is a simple eight-foot-square booth with Privalite glass walls that switch from transparent to translucent when a room is occupied. Once inside, the customer can switch the doors back to transparent at the touch of a switch, exposing themselves to onlookers waiting outside the room. What if I accidently switch the door back to transparent accidently I am too afraid to go to such dressing room..

  120. How about cookies? by rasqual · · Score: 1

    RFID chips need a writable component that stores a cookie that includes information about the last reader (referrer?) of the chip. Then you could know who knows -- but the price you'd pay is that the next person would know you know. Of course, no one would know who knows, because who knows what what the cookie knows means?

  121. I want one of the readers by threat_or_menace · · Score: 1

    Let these Prada customers have their tags. When the revolution comes, having one of the readers will be most useful - no inadvertent slaughtering of staff in the confusion, nossir. Using high concentrations of the RFID tags as target designators would lead to a little collateral damage, of course. But you tend to get that when you're doing time on target against even the most carefully chosen sites.

  122. Reciprocity ? by elpapacito · · Score: 1

    Let's take for granted companies will attempt to use RDIF or any other technology to get to know even more then they already do about our spending habits (marketing guys want to know a lot about us)

    Now, if they can track in almost-real time or realtime MY spending habits, history, locations and choices ... why can't I know THEIRS with the same ease ?

    Imagine going to *anycompany* and asking "Hey I bought this stuff from you and I know that you know I did ; I'd like to track your company habits as well". Police will be summoned and you'll be likely charged with

    1)invasion of private property (they'll lie)
    2)industrial espionage
    3)being a tinfoil-hat fool

    Or if they're a little gentle they'll just say "go stuff yourself, that's not stuff you're supposed to know"

    Well companies, data about me is not stuff you're supposed to know, so get lost as well.

  123. So... by trawg · · Score: 1

    ... does Ad Aware stop these people from tracking you, or what?

  124. for the rich? or for the tasteless by wolf_m16 · · Score: 0

    for the rich?

    I think not...

    for the tasteless is more like it.

    that kind of products is for people who want to look like they have a lot of money.

    they would be glad to transmit this disinformation to anyone who would recieve it.

  125. Sorry Officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wasn't shoplifting
    my loyality card just isn't working.

  126. Frequent Shopper Cards? by gadders · · Score: 1

    I didn't know Prada did these. I know in all their items you get a kind of credit-card sized piece of plastic in a little envelope, but thought this was more to prevent counterfeiting.

  127. inventory by ecloud · · Score: 1
    This enables the sales associate to spend more time attending personally to a customer, and less time chasing to the stock room to check for available items.

    I was impressed the other day at Walmart when I wanted to buy something that was out-of-stock, and a salesman scanned the barcode and then right there on his wireless scanner, reported to me which other stores claimed to have that item in stock. So you don't necessarily need RFID for that feature, at least.

    (But then, he said that often the system was wrong, and he spent 15 minutes or so to call all those other stores on the phone for me to check stock, and they were almost all out-of-stock anyway. So something's not connecting properly in their system, but it's a good idea, at least.)