Slashdot Mirror


Rack Mounted PCs for the Home User?

andrewa writes "Do any folks out there have recommendations on available gear for building a small, but extendable, rack-mounted system? As a developer of software for use in contact centers I want to put together a small development system that consists of at least three PCs to create a simulated environment to test my applications in. Why rack mounted? Well, I want to save space and only have the bare minimum systems (no need for multiple CD-ROMS, monitors, no sound-cards, just lots of memory and HD space). I also will add to this in the future, so don't want to limit myself to just a few pcs on the system. I've scouted around a bit, but didn't see too much. I'm in the UK at the moment, but will be moving to the U.S. in about 6 months, so power requirements (although I guess most equipment has switchable voltages) is a consideration."

442 comments

  1. Rack? by flewp · · Score: 0, Funny

    Rack mounted system? I think Pamela Anderson might be a good investment to look at.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    1. Re:Rack? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now you talkin' silicon!

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Rack? by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rackmount? For 3 pcs? Something small? Bad idea. Mini-ITX or or microATX is the way to go. Small boxes like this:

      http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?de sc ription=56-101-430&depa=0

      Racks themselves are expensive. Figure on a $250 minimum investment. Then a $100 minimum case cost.

      I've got a number of skyhawk 4U cases in a 48U rack. It works for me, especially with all my AV gear in lockdown shelves. Works for me, YMMV.

    3. Re:Rack? by Cheval · · Score: 0

      yes. I saw the investment counseling video that Tommy Lee and Pamela made together and it was quite good with lots of pointers.

    4. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much maintenance

    5. Re:Rack? by crackshoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, they're easy enough to salvage. I have 2 nice full height racks with power at the bottom and 1 without, all rescued from the dumpster (well, they hadn't quite gone in yet, but were about to) from a company closing its east coast branch. Other friends have built them (although mostly for audio)

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    6. Re:Rack? by cmacb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your link no workee.

      I find these systems interesting though:

      http://mini-itx.com/

      Hoping if and when I feel the need for a new computer I'll get one of these with an old enough processor that I can do with little or no fan.

    7. Re:Rack? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maintenence costs WAY too high on that model..

    8. Re:Rack? by ted_nugent · · Score: 1
      Hoping if and when I feel the need for a new computer I'll get one of these with an old enough processor that I can do with little or no fan.

      I believe you can do this with most any CPU, provided you can find a way to underclock the shit out of it. Should be pretty easy with low grade i386 hardware.

      --

      Free the West Memphis Three!

    9. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i saw some of it. My impression is either's she's borderline-retarded or has more drugs and alcohol flowing through her veins than blood.

      Every time she opened her mouth it was to suck cock or as "what time is it?" or "where are we?"

    10. Re:Rack? by fractalrock · · Score: 2, Informative

      It wasn't a link, it was a URL. And it worked just fine more me, after removing the (accidental?) space in "description". Here is the link...

    11. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find a large telco bldg. and look there on garbage day. They throw out so much stuff it is incredible!

    12. Re:Rack? by barfarf · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I actually did this (url below - how do you turn this into an actual link?). I started out with actual rack systems in it, but the heat and electric bill that it generated in my 2 bedroom condo was a little much for me, so I ended up going with a few Shuttle cases.

      My rack cost ~$300-$350, IIRC.

      http://www.gadget-freak.com/setup.JPG

    13. Re:Rack? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Rack mounted system? I think Pamela Anderson might be a good investment to look at."

      Pamela Anderson? Oh wow, that brings back some mammories...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:Rack? by keith_nt4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well I don't know if this would really be what you wanted, but you could use this idea: VCR Mod. You could install a system in a series of VCRs and stack them on top of each other. The only trick might be the air circulation.

      --
      "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
    15. Re:Rack? by alcmaeon · · Score: 5, Informative
      There is nothing wrong with a rackmount for 3 PC's. In fact it makes sense if yuou have space considerations and if you don't want cables laying all over the place.

      My suggestion is that you look on ebay for a rack cabinet. I just bought two of them on there for $50.00 each. One was a Sun Storage Array which probably cost over $1,000.00 new. The other was some generic cabinet, but both are perfectly functional. The Sun is too large for the house, but the other easily fits in a closet I use for my servers.

      Cases can easily be found brand new on PriceWatch for under $100.00. Sometimes you can find them for under $70.00. You can also buy used cases on ebay fairly cheaply.

      One additional think to think of is this. It strikes me that with some aluminum angle shelving material from Lowes, a drill, and some bolts, you could easily make a rack frame to put rack cases in. I also think that some heavy drawer rails would work as well as the server rack rails folks sell, which you cna also pick up cheaply on ebay.

      Alcmaon

    16. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, while the link didn't work as expected googling for it did suggest the correct link (got rid of the space).

      It's very useful to set google to automatically search for entries that aren't valid urls, then you don't have to hunt down the added space.

    17. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how do you turn this into an actual link?

      In Mozilla, hold down the left mouse button to highlight all of his comment. Then right-click and select "View Selection Source". You'll see how he used and . Look it up in an HTML reference. (Of course, on /. you select HTML Formatted down by the Submit/Preview buttons)

    18. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Slashdot's lameness filter inserts spaces into long "words" to make sure they don't prevent wrapping.

    19. Re:Rack? by fractalrock · · Score: 1

      Ah...gotcha. Thanks...

    20. Re:Rack? by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Informative

      For 3 computers, a rack is serious overkill. Unless you can do something like an underdesk rack. I found these rack rails last week while searching for something. I want a rack that is sturdy enough for me to move from house to house without disassembling, and came across these.

      You could use 2 pair of these to build an underdesk rolling rack cage (3 4U servers is only 28 inches).

    21. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pamela Anderson? Oh wow, that brings back some mammories...

      Ahh. . . Pamela Anderson mammories, how titillating . . .

    22. Re:Rack? by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines as parent you might consider brick form factors that fit in 5" bays and have one tower with multiple nodes. Check out:

      http://www.openbrick.org/

      and

      http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/briQ/

    23. Re:Rack? by David+E.+Smith · · Score: 1

      Oh, I think it's breast if we just change the subject right now.

    24. Re:Rack? by 1337+$14X0r · · Score: 1

      I've got one of these set up in my studio, and it works quite nicely.

      First, I picked up a used 14u Compaq rack on eBay. It came complete with a working 4-port KVM, sliding rails with cable arms (a MUST if you're going to be tinkering), and a boatload of cables. I then picked up some low-end 2u and 4u cases from newegg, and a big-honkin' surplus UPS to fill out the rack.

      As a tinkerer and case modder, the rack gives me nearly endless possibilities - windows, lights, accessories, I'm even trying to engineer a central watercooling system. But the reason I got one in the first place was space considerations. Between my firewall, server box, TiVo/media rig, gaming rig, etc. I had cables running all over the damned place. Now I have everything enclosed in one box, with nothing more sticking out than console cables and a USB hub.

      Nobody else has mentioned this yet that I've seen, but it's also possible to get low-end 2u cases that use standard ATX power supplies. The PSU is mounted flat near the front of the case, with the standard-size motherboard positioned in the rear. While this doesn't quite follow ATX design specs, it does allow for a much cheaper rig in a smaller space, while being much quieter than a 1u case (as 80mm fans can be used).

      eBay is useful if you're going to be building your own, but it's best if you can locate a local surplus dealer or liquidator, as shipping can be a real bitch when you're dealing with rack enclosures or UPSs.

      --

      --- Sigs are dumb.

    25. Re:Rack? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I just can't see the price/performance benefit of something like this? A mini-itx case isn't much larger, costs less (but may not run silent), and can be an order of magnitude FASTER cpu-wise.

      I guess if absolute silence is desirable, then these make great choices. A computer the size of a CDROM... hmm...

      Thanks for the links, tho. :-D

    26. Re:Rack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a clean breast of it you mean?

    27. Re:Rack? by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they are pricey but since my setup sits in my living room I was looking for silent, low heat, very small footprint.

      There are even smaller form factors that I have seen. I have thought also about an extended KVM cable and putting equipment in closet and just monitor, keyboard, mouse sitting out.

    28. Re:Rack? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      $40 for a 25' KVM cable. ;-)

      I did the same with my setup (my gear in my closet), but because I do photo processing now, I need something better. :-/

      Those SBC's with Mini-PCI look attractive for some things. Too bad the volume is so low that the price is so high. :-/

  2. Rack Mount!? by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ha!!!
    Get a bookcase, flip the tower computers on the side.

    Rack mounted indeed!

    1. Re:Rack Mount!? by lawrencekhoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I recently had to set up a mini-cluster for my department. We looked into rack mounts, but finally decided to go with micro-ATX PCs housed in a standard bookshelf. The main reason for our decision was that 1U servers are very expensive, hot, and noisy. 2U cases are better, and you can use off-the-shelf components, but 2U offers no space savings over micro-ATX.

      We found micro-ATX motherboards with dual DDR and gigabit ethernet built-in. Micro-ATX cases are cheap, and you can get solid 300 watt power supplies for them. Additionally, we can if needed fit in 3 standard PCI cards.

      So, we decided to get 15 micro-ATX PCs, and house them in 3 shelves of a standard 2 1/2' (w) x 6 1/2' (h) bookshelf. The PCs sit backwards so all the ports face out. There's still space for another 10 PC's in the bookshelf. Compare this with only 20 2U cases in a standard rack.

      My recommendation, go with micro-ATX PCs, unless you really need an ATX sized motherboard. It'll be easier to deal with and will save you a bunch of money over rack mounts.

    2. Re:Rack Mount!? by astrojetsonjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also use micro-ATX and I'm very happy with the stack that I have. I use the Ivar Ikea shelves, they come in different widths and depths and are open all around for good air flow. The upright supports are very sturdy (but use the cross braces anyway) and the holes allow for exact spacing of the shelves. I use that split plastic tube to hide the cables up and down the rack. I use screws inside the tube to fasten it to the back two rails, the tube runs from top to bottom of the rack. Nice and neat installation.

    3. Re:Rack Mount!? by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Which micro-ATX cases did you use?

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:Rack Mount!? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Having them sit with the ports out? I hope they're not windows boxes, you'll need to get to the reset button far more often than you'll need to get at the cables. Unless you just pull the power cable for a second.

    5. Re:Rack Mount!? by lawrencekhoo · · Score: 1

      Five of these GTR Model A668 cases fit on a 2 1/2' wide shelf:
      http://www.gtr.com.hk/new-subpage/product/case_m ain/tiny/sub-page/a668/a668.htm
      They have pretty good airflow, and hold two 6cm fans at the back. They cost about US$30 each here in Hong Kong. I don't know if you can get them in the US. But, any micro-ATX case less than 5 1/2" wide x 14" high, should work fine if it has good airflow.

    6. Re:Rack Mount!? by jdray · · Score: 1
      That URL doesn't work. I tried the home page, but don't read Chinese (or whatever it is). And there's no "go to our English site" link on the page that's identifiable to an English speaker.

      Too bad, too. I'm always in the market for a cool new case.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    7. Re:Rack Mount!? by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      The URL works, once you remove the normal slashdot-inserted space in the middle of it.

    8. Re:Rack Mount!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHLOLOLOOLGOGL!O!L
      cuz windows crashes!!!!
      it's really bad

    9. Re:Rack Mount!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These cases are available from several vendors. In January, I bought one similar to this case (http://www.compgeeks.com/details.asp?invtid=3304- SIL&cat=CAS)
      from Compgeeks for my sons computer. So far it's been a decent unit (running 7/24). I've added a front mounted fan and am considering additional fans in the back (it curently has an AthlonXP 2000+ in it). A key factor, at least for me, is the fact that it can handle full height PCI cards. The case it replaced was a low profile "Book-PC" only accepted 1/2 height cards...

    10. Re:Rack Mount!? by song-of-the-pogo · · Score: 1

      do either of you (astrojetsonjr and lawrencekhoo) have pictures of your setups for us to see?

      --
      soupy twist
  3. No thanks by rixstep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rack mounted PCs? No thanks.

    But an Xgrid cluster something like VA Tech's in my closet I can hook up to the laptops would be nice.

    If I sell this scratchy iPod mini I should have enough loose change...

    1. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rack mounted PCs? No thanks.

      But an Xgrid cluster something like VA Tech's in my closet I can hook up to the laptops would be nice.


      We are talking about something that you can maybe get without having to refinance (or sell) your home.

  4. Musicians worked this one out long ago... by kaosmunkee · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can buy 19" rack equipment that was designed for musicians... Something like this might work, if you cooled it properly. 6U of space will hold 6 1U servers. And they're made to be shipped around, so when you move you won't have to do too much to pack them up.

    1. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by mabinogi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you'd probably be better off looking for stuff designed for PCs.

      The moment anything is associated with professional audio, it gets a 500% markup.
      Especially if they're designed for gigging, computer racks don't need to be anywhere near as robust.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by AltImage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Musician's racks won't work. They're both 19 inch racks but rack comuters are much deeper than musical equipment. Computers are about 20"-24" deep. Music hardware is about half that and the racks reflect that.

    3. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Audio AV gear is usually not deep enough to house 1U servers, so I don't advise it.

    4. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by T-Ranger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anything that relates to racks - rack cases, racks themselves - gets a 500% markup.

    5. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by MrChuck · · Score: 2, Informative
      My SKBs are about 14" deep. my computers are deeper. While the 21band EQ and compressor/limiter are great to have in it (you do all have those in your stereo systems, right?), they'd suck even if they were deep enough for computers. My old amplifier cases had fans and occasionally got a bag of dry ice.

      However, building a "road case" is neither hard nor expensive. making it roadable would want some experience with working with (say) anvil cases a bit for back panels, fasteners, etc.

      And yeah, my SKBs have taken a beating that just hurt to see ("no you idiot, close the van door before pulling it forward 5 feet. And it's a clutch, be gentle" drummers. sigh.).

    6. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by crackshoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do pro audio on the apple platform, and i was looking at getting a g4 xserve to take around to gigs. unfortunately, most computer racks are too deep to fit in a closed end audio rack. I ended up just carrying around a g4 tower, and a rack full of DAT, AUdio interfaces, and other stuff. However, a rack tower is usually open on the back, to allow access to patch cables, etc., so if the case only needs to be screwed in front, you'd be fine.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    7. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other consideratons too...
      I have a rather nice Carillion rack here, and the money has gone into making it absolutely silent.
      I think you will find that a quiet rack mounted PC will cost just as much as one designed for music.

      They are also very well made with quality parts, you get what you pay for. :)

    8. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um dont think so...

      I can get a 8U flight Cae from musicians friend for $79.00US while the same Travel PC rack costs $500.00

      professional audio is dirt cheap as there are far more of them than Computer people.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by statusbar · · Score: 1

      That is one of my pet peeves. My rack boxes are 24" deep and they really only need to be 14". Where do I buy 1 and 2 U rack cases that are no more than 14" deep?

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    10. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by clifyt · · Score: 2, Informative

      That and the G4 XServ sounds like a stack of vacuum cleaners :-)

      There is a decent rack system from Marathon that works for the G4s...the only problem is that the CD is now sideways -- but I'll probably be picking one up soon to get next to my rack'd PC so I don't have to crate everything up when I need to take the stuff on the road (luckily most of the time, its just in town).

      BTW -- if you need to have ports up front, there are kits for both Mac and PC to reroute most of this up there...as well as a specialized fack for PCs that had the motherboard 'backwards' so that you see this stuff on the front end -- its a lot more because its targetted at the music audience, but I've tried the standard reroute hardware (its about $20) which uses a 5 1/4 bay up front...makes it easier so that even if the rack is open up front, you don't need to twist the rack during a gig -- or if you keep it at home and push a stationary rack up against the wall, you don't have to drag it out (I keep mine on wheels so its just a quick spin).

    11. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by Speare · · Score: 1

      I discovered this when I was looking into home racks a few years ago. The plastic portable audio gig racks looked good for what I wanted, but the computer would have to stick out the back. The computing half-racks were way heavier and far more expensive. The only benefit the computing half-rack had besides the measurements was slightly better ventilation design.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    12. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Informative

      24" is the standard depth of 4 post racks. Actually, likely something like 23 3/4" or 24 1/4" because 24" would be too easy. 24" on center? Outside posts? Inside posts? Beh. I know the 4' 4 post cabinet sitting next to me is out of alignment.

    13. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      .. if there weren't dozens and dozens of audio hobbyists, band members and other people who actually needed racks to put their equipment into(cheap stuff as well).

      sure you might not want to get the high end supergrade rack. but then again even a cheap flimsy pc rack can have a quite hefty pricetag(because, um, it's for computers).

      there's also shitloads of project pages of people building their own racks, for cheap(also this has been covered on slashdot quite a few times before).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by SeverianDragon · · Score: 2

      Yes yes, this works. The other two posts are mildly correct as well. You can build your own cabinets, All you need are some latches, wood and the rack rails. which you can get at any musicians supply shop for alot cheaper than the prefab stuff AND, if you build in your own power supply you can also build fans into the sucker.

      --
      Once more into the birch deer fiends!
    15. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      If you look, though, nothing inside the computer is more than about 12" deep. If you're willing to just buy power supplies and drill a few holes into sheet metal, the musician racks would work just fine.

    16. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      And here I just schlep a laptop.

      A little velco on the bottom and it lives atop the FX rack. But I'm at the sound board.

      (and yeah, an XServe sounds like a shop vac).

    17. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by colin_n · · Score: 1

      I can attest to this. I bought an SKB box and ended up having to cut out part of the back to fit my rack mounted case in. It was way too deep. If I had it to do over again, I would probably not buy the SKB case, even though it was only 100 bucks.

      --

      --------- I have no signature
    18. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by clifyt · · Score: 1

      I use my iBook for a lot, but it just doesn't have the buss bandwidth to deal with everything needed. Even the TiBooks with the FW800 really don't have what it needs to do more than a dozen in / outs at a time before you start to slow down.

      Past that, unless you upgrade, laptop HDs rarely top 54k RPM. If you are running a pure synthesis rig -- something like Reaktor -- or even a hybrid app that is intended for DJs and not for serious musicians (DJs and Musicians have a good deal of the same skill sets, but it *IS* a different profession...most folks I know have their hands in both sides these days) such as Acid or Soundtrack or even Reason, bandwidth isn't a big thing because you really aren't running that much in the way of resources.

      So it really depends on what you are after -- if I just need to do remix stuff, its the iBook. If its DAW work, its the G4. If its DAW + Orchestration, its the G4 + PC (for Gigasampler) + all the other hardware crap.

      And if you use the velcro, make certain you get the good 3M Industrial stuff -- I've dumped a rack over and had my mixer still stuck to the top of it hanging over the side of the stage with this stuff :-) Never skimp on the adhesives...

    19. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by lordbrain · · Score: 1

      You mean something like this?

      --

      Thank you. Thank you. Please no applause; just throw money
    20. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      *off topic warning*

      Strange, I know two drummers, and they are both very carefull about equipment, well the one manages to bang himself up alot playing, knuckles hitting the rim, swinging wild with the sticks and bashing himself in the head, etc.
      One nearly had a hart attack when I offered to help carry some of his stuff inside for a performance.
      The one anoying habbit they do have is taking up all the attractive women around, and neigther band is that popular and they're both small skinny guys :/

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    21. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbsih. You can get 19" racks as deep as you like.
      It's actually harder to find the less deep ones.
      Just check the SKB site.

    22. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      I don't tihnk apple currently sells a faster laptop frive thahn 4200. But really - carrying around a g4 tower is pretty damn easy. its not heavy, andd the handles are really comfortable.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    23. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Yeah -- but most of the pros with G4 / G5s have complex setups and thus would want to keep everything racked :-) Its getting easier with Firewire where you just have 3 or 4 connections to make to the back of the machine, but still...

      As for speeds, I think the TiBook is 5200, but the iBook I have is a 4200. Shhhlow. We sucessfully put in an 7500 into a TiBook a few months ago, but it runs hot and the battery gets drained a LOT faster. Almost better just to run an external in this situation (but thats what the client wanted).

    24. Re:Musicians worked this one out long ago... by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      Hey, Guy who's hanging around from the club to help. Pick up my $3000 of gear without any protection around it. Hope you didn't drink or smoke anything.

      No, I'll stick with sound boards packed in 3" of foam and locked in a crate thank you. And my SKBs HAVE taken a hard dive - the cases are flexible to absorb impact. My (black lombard) PB goes into a padded envelope and tucked into my personal bag or with the mics).

      (and yeah, I hand carry everything myself except when reality clunks in and there are 12 folks who've been asked to hand around and help us load out and I've been on my feet working for 10 hrs and I can either pack and point at stuff or I can carry stuff for 2 hrs. And the former also involved hanging out chatting up the cute girl.

      foam and racks - you always want protection ;)

  5. Been there, done that, painted it metallic green by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Informative

    Couple of thoughts here on this as I've done what your looking to do. First suggestion is wait to buy your stuff until you get here in the US to save yourself shipping fees and possible import duties. Once your here and settled look on ebay for a local auction so that you don't have to have the rack shared.

    Going back to school to pick up Cisco and SUN I wanted a rack to hold all the requisite lab equipment for my sandbox - and I thought it would be nifty. I did this last summer and I was able to buy a 42u rack for $100 by watching a week for a local rack on ebay and avoided $200 in shipping fees. Of course no data center I have ever seen was willing to personalize their their rack by painting it metallic green like I did:)

    When your buying your rack mount systems bear in mind that 1u cases tend to cost a lot more and have lower capacity. If you have the room, and at home you should, buy either a 3u or 4u rack case and then you don't have to use low profile memory, cards, power supplies and the like that are a fair bit more expensive than standard issue fair.

    You can easily get the 3u or 4u cases on ebay for the same price range as a normal computer case. However the rack mount keyboards, mice and monitors cost a pretty penny. If you buy a full rack it will be far cheaper to just by a couple rackmount shelfs and put an old 15" Monitor, KVM, Keyboard and still have plenty of room left over.

    Also bear in mind your electric capacity with where you place it. In my experience you'll get around 6-8 systems for a LAN party on your standard 15 amp outlet before blowing the circuit. If you can put it on a circuit that is as isolated as you can make it.

  6. Consider Emulation by poppycock · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have good luck with a mixture of Virtual PC for Macs and VMWare for Linux. VPC doesn't run on the G5s yet, though.

    Maybe a virtual solution will work for you?

    1. Re:Consider Emulation by Total_Wimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have good luck with a mixture of Virtual PC for Macs and VMWare for Linux.

      These are great, but having multiple systems comes in handy. It's always nice to know that that thing you're going to blow up will only affect one machine and your really important stuff is gonna keep hummin' along on the side.

      For the stuff I really don't know enough about yet, I like to have a seperate box to play.

      TW

    2. Re:Consider Emulation by Unregistered · · Score: 3, Informative

      VPC and VMWare create system images, so anything you do in the virtual system will only affect that system and it's disk image (a file on teh real system). No more dangerous. They are not emulators at all, you create a system image, install an os on it, hook it up to the network and it's just like a different computer. Except cheaper. Much cheaper. And i think you can have multiple systems open at once.

    3. Re:Consider Emulation by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

      That you can, and with VMWare 4.5 (just released), you can task more than 1GB of RAM to the virtual machines. If you have an average SMP or a very fast single-CPU system with boatloads of RAM and some good, fast disks (a RAID-1/0 array works wonders for this), you can have a very nice virtual network running with many systems active. I've run a network of about six virtual systems before on one box; one day, I'll see how many I can run with the new RAM availablity.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Consider Emulation by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be a smartass here, but I gotta ask: You'd take a phyical machine on your internal network and load a vitual machine and put it out on the DMZ and not worry one lick about it? I like VMWare plenty, but when it comes to security, I'd have to assume your host box would have to be secure first. If you have a mix of uses, I'd be pretty surprised if you felt comfortable unless all uses were secure.

      TW

    5. Re:Consider Emulation by FireHawk77028 · · Score: 1

      The only problem with emulating multiple systems on one system is that it is ONE system. If he wanted to test how different systems can interact with each other, it will be completely different if the systems are actually one. ie, connecting to another system that is really a system will be much faster than connecting to another REAL system. I don't think any genre of software dev. was mentioned, so this may or may not apply.

    6. Re:Consider Emulation by rimu+guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Instead of VMWare consider User Mode Linux. It is free. And it permits you to run many virtual servers per host server. e.g. you should be able to run 16-30 virtual servers per 3Ghz Intel proc. Just make sure you have enough memory (4GB is handy).

      With Copy on Write file systems you can prep up your testing environment. Snapshot it. Run your tests. Then nuke the resulting file systems and start again. Being able to start a test run with the whole file system in the state it was in when you started (without having to roll back individual files and databases) is very convenient.

      - UML-based VPS Hosting

    7. Re:Consider Emulation by Znork · · Score: 1

      The VM is verified inescapable. The host box does not have to be 'secure' (from the point of trying to hack the host from the VM), it just must not be connected to the external network. Take a physical machine on your internal network, load a VM on it, connect the VM to the NIC on your external net, have your internal machine connected on another network card to the internal network (or even better, dont have your internal machine connected to the internal network at all; have another VM connected to the internal network on a separate NIC).

      It's perfectly safe, you just have to think for a few minutes how you build the virtual network infrastructure in the physical box.

      I've even had such a setup audited and cleared by external security auditing firms to be sure.

    8. Re:Consider Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so. With VMware it's truely like having separate computers.

      Give it a try (free 30 day version available), you'll be surprised.

    9. Re:Consider Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy said call centers or something like that,which means he needs specialized hardware (aka voice/fax cards) which cannot be natively accessed via VMWare, I think.

    10. Re:Consider Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another benefit of something like VMware is that you can back up and restore a system image to a known state very quickly since it's just a few files on your (real) HD. Many PC software companies, including Microsoft, use it for this reason to test install tools.

      The downside of emulation is that you won't see exactly the same race conditions and concurrency effects as with real machines, and it won't be representative of real world performance in any area where there is a high emulation overhead (kernel-mode CPU, graphics, networking, etc.)

  7. One BIG system and VMWare... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get one big system and a VMware license... saves lots of space and hardware costs... plus - when you aren't running the other systems... you have one kick ass box.

    1. Re:One BIG system and VMWare... by chrisopherpace · · Score: 1

      If its for Linux, you could also run User Mode Linux, and save on the VMware license.
      Link Here

    2. Re:One BIG system and VMWare... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But if he is trying to performance tune, tune load balancing and test failover especially on systems that may be horizontally and vertically scaled, vmware isn't going to cut it. You need the actual hardware....but for inter OS testing and just "playing" around with other OSes, vmware is awesome

      --
      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    3. Re:One BIG system and VMWare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except you can only use it to run linux.
      oh wait, wasnt seeing things from the slashbot point of view.

    4. Re:One BIG system and VMWare... by cornjones · · Score: 1

      don't know if you are building an MS based system but MS has a virtual machine emulator in workable beta. I have spoken w/ companies using it w/ great success.

    5. Re:One BIG system and VMWare... by rmull · · Score: 1

      And you might already get it for effectively free since its in the MSDN.

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
  8. Follow Apple's example by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple has a Xserve mincluster that has done some things right - small size, acousticly shielded, and on wheels. I must stress the acoustic part if you'e going to work next to this machine - My dual athlon with raid's drone got irritating very quickly.

    1. Re:Follow Apple's example by mroch · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.apple.com/xserve/cluster/wgcluster.html "The Apple Workgroup Cluster for Bioinformatics provides a faster, easier and lower-cost path to scientific discovery. You'll get rapid access to data analysis with minimal administrative burden in one comprehensive, industry-leading solution. All starting at $27,999." I wish......

    2. Re:Follow Apple's example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Something tells me this guy isn't looking to spend $28,000. I can't believe you got modded up for such stupidity. +5 Pro-Apple.

    3. Re:Follow Apple's example by monophaze · · Score: 2, Informative

      That rack unit in the picture looks like it is XtremeMac's Xrack which is a 12U enclosed rack designed for XServe+XRaid for around $1799

    4. Re:Follow Apple's example by Smurf · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can't believe you got modded up for such stupidity.

      If you read his post carefully you will notice that he didn't say "buy an Xserve mini cluster". He said "follow Apple's example", and then he showed several things that Apple did right with their Workgroup Cluster.

      Many of those things can be achieved by using cheaper hardware and not getting all the goodies that you don't need (e.g., the truckload of software), so you can follow Apple's example without spending $28,000.

    5. Re:Follow Apple's example by ameoba · · Score: 1

      That's pretty impressive for an 'off the shelf' model. Thest part is the line on the XServe Cluster page where it says "Imagine a cluster".

      You know they really wanted to say Beowulf.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  9. buy those ice cubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    much cheaper and even less space

  10. what about virtualization by joshtimmons · · Score: 4, Informative

    You didn't say much about your application, but you might want to look at using vmware instead of a stack of hardware. I've been using it since 1.0 and it has completely quenched my need to buy and maintain a suite of servers for testing my distributed apps.

    1. Re:what about virtualization by mmusson · · Score: 1

      I would second that. I run XP, 2000, Gentoo, FreeBSD 4.8 and FreeBSD 5.2 concurrently with no troubles.

      --
      SYS 49152
    2. Re:what about virtualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you like to use a popular version... such as SuSE 9.0. VMware refuses to put out a simple patch to fix the issue.

    3. Re:what about virtualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "New OS Support: SUSE Linux 9.0 listed under 4.5 (not 4.5.1).

    4. Re:what about virtualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I third that. I run several virtual development networks, it's very good software.

  11. Gank it from work by DeathPenguin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I take it the person who asked the question wants to run on server boards, which basically excludes any of the cute little shoebox cases available. They can also be rather large, which excludes many desktop mid-tower cases as well. Most 1U cases I've seen are intended strictly for datacenter use and aren't built with acoustical ergonomics in mind--They usually run several 40mm 7000RPM fans and generate a lot of noise.

    I usually just go to Antec for enclosures, but in this case it might just be wiser to have your boss order a few extra nodes that you can take home. Modern Xeon and Opteron systems tend to get very, very hot in 1U enclosures and require wind tunneling for more efficient cooling and require enormous amounts of power from PSUs that cost several hundred dollars in 1U form factor.

  12. Rack Mounted Servers by FiberOpPraise · · Score: 5, Informative

    I currently work with servers, specifically rackmounted servers. I can tell you that for home use they are not worth the effort. For one thing heat is a big issue. Its no longer trivial to add some case fans to the back and let the air flow freely. You also can not use standard heatsinks because they will not fit in a 1U case.

    The main and possibly only benefit of the rackmounted server is because it saves space. This is essential when putting servers in a datacenter as they charge you for how much space you use.

    If you are not going to put the servers into a datacenter just put the computer in a standard case which is about (4U) and save yourself the $300-$600 that a rackmount case will set you back alone.

    1. Re:Rack Mounted Servers by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You also can not use standard heatsinks because they will not fit in a 1U case

      Who said that 1U was required? There are taller ATX-based cases that use standard motherboards and add-in cards.

      I've seen ATX rackmount cases that go for $250, I think one with redundant power supplies is a little more. The case looked pretty decent, it definitely wasn't crappy like most / all sub $100 PC cases I've seen.

    2. Re:Rack Mounted Servers by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      If you are using rackmount cases, and you need to add non-stock fans to them, you are doing something wrong. That might be buying cheap ass 1u cases. All the name brand 1u servers I've seen (Dell, IBM, Sun) had insane amounts of fans. And pleanty of fan related fault tollerance - they will get faster if things get too hot, or one of them fails.

      Your machine might not have enough cooling power. If you are just blowing around hot air then it matters not how hard you blow.

      Rack mount cases have other advantages besides just 'raw' space. They have very specific sizes - perdictability over both the short term "Hey, lets move X over there" and the long term "how big a room do I need for 5735 machines?" is valuable. Being physcially stable is important; I cant tell you how many times Ive kicked loose power cables and nearly knocked over shelves of PC clones in more then one clients "machine room". This stability also makes, for example, cable routing much neater. Having things neat decreases time needed for scheduled downtime, and the time needed for unscheduled downtime.

    3. Re:Rack Mounted Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can tell you that for home use they are not worth the effort.

      No you can't! I have 4 rack boxes, no heat issues and takes roughly the same amount of space as 2 desktop machines. These objections to using rack systems seem to come from people who dont need/use them and all tend toward sillyness.

  13. Middle Atlantic Products & NewEgg by lesinator · · Score: 5, Informative

    Middle Atlantic Products makes some nice, inexpensive rack hardware in their musician's section that's suitable for a home rack. I have one of their 36" racks and its served me well. In it I have racked a few homebrew PC's, mostly with rack-mount cases purchased from NewEgg. Decent rack-mount cases, not overly priced, and many will take standard sized motherboards and power supplies.

  14. deja vu by DougMackensie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:deja vu by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      times change my friend, what may not be affordable then, can be CHEAP ASS now.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  15. none here by JoshuaDFranklin · · Score: 1, Funny
    Do any folks out there have recommendations on available gear for building a small, but extendable, rack-mounted system?

    No, I don't. Sorry.

  16. HP's got some decent lowend hardware by digitalgimpus · · Score: 5, Informative

    HP's got some really cheap (sub $2000) rackmountable hardware available, with decent specs. They are intel based, so could run Linux, Solaris x86, or if you must W2k, W2k3.

    Checkout the Proliant's:
    http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/se rvers/prolian tdl140/index.html

    That's not to bad for the hardware.

    1. Re:HP's got some decent lowend hardware by abouttime · · Score: 1

      Just FYI - spent three hours this weekend trying to install Solaris x86 on a DL140. Just doesnt work. Redhat, Windows work great though.

    2. Re:HP's got some decent lowend hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be Proliants not Proliant's.

    3. Re:HP's got some decent lowend hardware by euxle · · Score: 1

      I work with a lot of ProLiants. They are very good server hardware with decent Linux support.
      But I wouldn't use them at home, may be in the garage. When I'm installing them in my office, my coworkers get annoyed quite fast since they start making noise even when you just plug them in. Once you turn them on, the fans get on speed and it is super loud. They do have even a third noise level once they are getting warmer. And they are quite heavy too, so definitely no machine you want to move over the atlantic with.

      I would agree with some comment more downwards that suggests a mini-itx solution.

  17. Mini-ATX by mroch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree that having your own rack would be cool, and I would build one if I had the money, but I can't help but wonder what the benefit is over some mini-ATX boxes aside from the bragging rights. Shuttle's XPC line might do the trick and actually take up less space...

    1. Re:Mini-ATX by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Or even the mini-ITX boards...

      Less power, less noise, less heat... and tiny.

      Not a bad combination when you're planning on having half-a-dozen or so of them sitting in the room with you.

      Rack-mount gear is not small, a roll-about rack is roughly 18" wide, 24-27" deep (add 3" for cabling on the back), and maybe 36-42" high. And as someone else mentioned, it tends to be hot (designed for air-conditioned rooms which cool the ambient temp down to 65F/20C), noisy (due to size of fans, rpms needed, and quiet-is-not-a-design-constraint), and power-hungry. Great if you have a dedicated server closet with it's own cooling system, not so great if you have to live in the same room as the gear.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:Mini-ATX by ameoba · · Score: 1

      You can always build your own mini-itx rack thing.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  18. Why not laptops? by chrispyman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, laptops are great as far as size is concerned and as a bonus come with battery backup! Rackmount cases really aren't that small (atleast not the 1U type), just thin and long. A few small factor form PCs would probably work better unless you're really sure you want rackmount. Rackmounts are better left in the server room I say.

    1. Re:Why not laptops? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      it would probably be more cost efficient if you could get a deal on laptops without displays...just a thought

    2. Re:Why not laptops? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      try ebay. I saw some nice laptops without displays. Or even call a manufacturor/store and see if they could help you out.

      I'm currently running a laptop as a personal server ad it frees up a lot of space since it just sits in thee pile of networking gear with DLS modem, hub, and router.

    3. Re:Why not laptops? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Laptops with a defective display are also often a good deal. As long as they have a VGA jack for setting them up.

      --
      resigned
    4. Re:Why not laptops? by blate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not? Because laptops aren't designed to be servers. They generally underperform similarly-classed full-size systems, are generally not designed to be always-on, have flakey hardware, etc., etc.

      Furthermore, laptop harddrives are much slower than server-class storage and, in my experience, have a much lower life expectancy.

      Finally, laptops dump a lot of heat out their bottoms and don't like to be stacked on atop another. If you try this, you're liable to end up with a fire or, at the very least, hardware failures, in short order.

      I think "use the right tool for the job" applies here... :)

    5. Re:Why not laptops? by fistynuts · · Score: 1

      I'd be tempted to go for several Shuttle-type boxes (http://www.shuttle.com/) instead of a rack because they'll take up less space and will probably end up cheaper. The bad side is that there's not much room for expansion in those boxes, but the plus side is that once you've finished with them they look very cute sat plugged into your TV in the living room :)

      --
      "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
  19. Previous discussion: PC with smallest footprint? by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    There was a similar question asked about the PC with the smallest footprint. Maybe there are some suggestions there.

  20. rackmount? by towaz · · Score: 1

    Why not just a good pc and vmware?

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
  21. SuperMicro by christooley · · Score: 1

    Supermicro makes a great 1U system that's only 14" deep. it's pretty quiet and can take a celery or P4 chip. The 14" depth means you can get an enclosed networking rack and not have to listen to them.

    1. Re:Supermicro by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Informative? I find the parent ignorant. There are 4-5U rackmountable standard ATX cases available for around $75, and take standard PSUs and motherboards. I have built one myself, and was pleased with the cost... about $50 more than a standard PC, all because if the case.

      The parent is only valid if you are building a custom 1-2U system, or are going for higher-end rackmount cases.

    2. Re:Supermicro by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      A 4U-5U system is a desktop case on rails. That's not a nice rackmount case with hot-swap bays and rollers. You might as well just buy shelves for your rack and lay a standard ATX case on its side on the shelf if you want to buy a 4U-5U case. The original poster said he wants rack mount systems for development and simulation. Since he's asking for rackmount solutions he's surely not implying that wants something other than a low-end server.

    3. Re:Supermicro by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      Hrm. I'm sorry, I work in a datacenter full of 2-4 processor servers that are 4U (in addition to some 1 and 2U machines as well). I have also built "server class" (hot-swappable drives, RAIDed) into those "desktop cases with rails" you speak of.

      We're clearly not connecting thoughts here, you and I' but it's presumptious to suggest that because he wants dev and sim boxes he NEEDS 1U servers with low-profile heatsinks and power supplies and much higher costs.

  22. Redneck Rackmounts... by flynns · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plywood. Duct tape.

    What? It works for mah gun rack!

    --
    'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  23. Enermax and BTX cases by spacehymns · · Score: 1

    Enermax makes some low-cost 4U cases that I've seen used successfully for home media PCs, but the fit and finish are remeniscent of 70s-era supercomputer projects. Keep in mind that the BTX form-factor motherboards are due out this year, and will likely make ATX boxed obsolete in terms of cooling and noise.

  24. Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by John_Booty · · Score: 5, Informative

    The thing about rackmounts is that they're terribly noisy, especially 1U units, because they've got numerous, small, high-rpm fans. It's a real cacaphony of noise and heat so if you don't have a separate room for them, you'll get sick of them really quickly. There's also the price premium you pay for 1U cases and low-profile memory compared to normal parts. If you need multiple systems at home, I'd suggest mini-PC's from Shuttle. Small, quiet, and cheaper than rackmounts (slightly more than regular whitebox PCs). They're flat on top so they're very stackable... 3 or 4 of them would take up the space of a normal fullsize tower. They take normal PC components, and they have 100mbps network adapters built in (some of the high-end P4 units might have 1000mbps, I'm not sure) A barebones Shuttle w/ sound, network, and video costs between $220 and $400. After that cost you just need to drop in a CPU, ram, and disk drive. Quite affordable. At least one supercomputer cluster chose Shuttle PCs, I forget which one. This is my second Slashdot post in a few weeks extolling these things. I don't work for them, honest. I'm just a very satisfied customer. :P

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    1. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by jjeffries · · Score: 5, Funny

      OH, I DUNNO, I HAVE A BUNCH OF DELL RACKMOUNTS, AND AT FIRST I THOUGHT THEY WERE KINDA LOUD BUT NOW I HARDLY NOTICE IT. I AM WORKING ON A 2.4GHZ 2650 WITH 5 DISKS IN MY OFFICE RIGHT NOW AND IT HARDLY MAKES A WHISPER.

      oh my gosh how terrible the lameness filter is trying to foil my message, lowercase lowercase lowercase text text text text one two three four i love the marine corps happy fun ball sorry dave i'm afraid i can't do that my very educated mother blahblahblah

    2. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Shuttles may be quieter than rackmount systems, but the few Shuttle branded cases I've seen are louder than any of my PCs. Sure, they use heat pipes, but the fans attached at the other end of the heat pipe makes quite a racket, and the fan in the power supply is a tiny high RPM one, meaning a high pitch whine.

    3. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 2650s are quiet? I've got some PowerEdge 650s that make quite a racket. Of course, 1U cases are generally louder than 2U ones...

    4. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by scrote-ma-hote · · Score: 4, Funny
      oh my gosh how terrible the lameness filter is trying to foil my message, lowercase lowercase lowercase text text text text one two three four i love the marine corps happy fun ball sorry dave i'm afraid i can't do that my very educated mother blahblahblah
      You send spam too don't you? I thought i'd seen that before.
    5. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by TekGoNos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent ... oh, he is already at 5.

      More seriously, I worked at a place where we had to test a new rack for our server farm.
      It was one (1) Dell rack and running in our office for two weeks or so ...
      While it was somewhat cool to have a rack in your office ;-), it was VERY noisy, we had problems to communicate. Whenever we switched it off, it was a huge relief.
      These things are build to run in a separated room, 24/7 under maximum load. So cooling is the first priority, while noise reduction is a non-issue.

      You definitly DONT want to be with multiple racks in the same room for long if you can avoid it.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    6. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by John_Booty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which model Shuttles have you dealt with?

      I've used three models: the original SV24 (Celeron, no heat pipe), the SN41G2 (AthlonXP 2500, heatpipe) and the SN45G (AthlonXP 3000, heatpipe).

      The SV24 is really noisy and high-pitched. But the other two are nearly silent. You may have been using an older BIOS, or had some funky BIOS settings, if you had noise troubles.... newer Shuttle BIOSs allow you to enable fan control that keeps the fans near-silent at normal temperatures. If you set the BIOS to have the fans at full blast 100% the time, yes, they're very noisy, but this doesn't need to be an issue with the proper BIOS version and/or settings. Newer Shuttles come with the BIOSes already updated and configured properly, so for somebody buying a Shuttle today, it's not an issue. :P

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    7. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on your model type, you might want to check for BIOS updates. We had some Dells whose fans would spin top speed 24/7 until we upgraded BIOS, then they only went top speed on hardware failure or overheat. While still noisy, was better after the upgrade than before. Not that it really matters, most of our machines are kept in server room, but every now and then we pull one out into the office for separate testing.

    8. Re:Rackmounts are terribly noisy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sitting right next to a bunch of 1u Dells & my mother has already bought me a set of earplugs.

  25. Don't *need* a rack by crmartin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was a little bit of a surprise to me when I visited rackspace.com a year or so ago, but they have a very high density scheme with no racks to speak of. Instead, they get steel-wire shelves like these, put cheap x86 boxes -- they actually assembler their own from commodity parts, which certainly makes sense if you're setting up thousands of boxes as they do -- in minitowers on them, and cable them with conventional cables tied with plastic cable ties.

    Works great, relatively cheap, and you can do something else with the "rack" later if you want.

    1. Re:Don't *need* a rack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use this solution at home. It's great. I'm only running 4 systems on it at the moment, but there is plenty of room for all my network gear, printers, phones, UPS, blank cd-r/dvd-r, and whiskey bottle collection. :)

      Also, if you spend the time to neatly ziptie power strips and all the cables to the frame, you can easily move it w/o catching the dangling mess of cables on everything.

    2. Re:Don't *need* a rack by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      The Planet/ServerMatrix do a simular thing. They get those shelves and just dump ATX towers. See a live picture here. (Warning: Java applet). I feel sorry for the support guy there.

      Personally, for my home clustering project where Mini-ITX is not a option and I don't have real room for towers, I'm going to pick up some Jaycar 2U Rackmounts for AUS $95. Keep in mind that I don't need to place hard drives etc. in there, and that my power supply needs will be taken care of externally.

    3. Re:Don't *need* a rack by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      Wow. Those wire shelves dont look like they are bolted down.

      /me imagines a massive domino game in the machine room.

    4. Re:Don't *need* a rack by chrsbrwn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, well, sometimes you get what you pay for :(

      Note that my experience comes from both working in a datacenter (a competitor to Rackspace, won't say who), and from having a home rack built out of that wire shelving. There are pros and cons to both sides.

      The biggest pro, of course, to the cheap white box and wire shelving way is the cheapness factor. The problem is that this is only an advantage while you have a lot of extra space in the data center. You can only get 9 or 12 white boxes in a rack stacked vertically, you can get 42 1U servers in a single rack. 3 times the density, basically. Plus, in my experience with our legacy cheap whiteboxes, they are far more likely to have hardware failures (power supply, motherboard, etc.) than the higher class hardware (mostly IBM, some Dell and HP). Hard drives fail in everything, but the whiteboxes are a pain in the ass to take apart to replace them. The rackmount servers open right up, and everything is right there where you can get to it. Also, the nonserver motherboards and bioses that were put in the whitebox have various issues with our automated build systems (varying NICs, some supporting PXE boot, some not, different array controllers, etc). You can control some of this by buying the same parts from the same vendors, but consumer systems don't have the build stability that server oriented systems do. Even if you are buying exactly the same model, you can find components (and drivers!) changing from one revision to the next depending on where the manufacturer got the best deal.

      Now, as to the home environment, like I said, I have a wire shelf rack, with a bunch of different stuff on it (Suns, PCs, Powermacs). The main reason I am probably going to buy a real rack for the new house I just bought is flexibility. You can't easily move shelves around or add shelves to one of those wire units without taking the whole thing apart. If you only have tower systems, all exactly the same height, this is probably not a big deal. You just make all the shelves the right space for the tower systems, and leave them in place. But if you have a mix of stuff, and you want to maximize your space usage, you really want to put stuff horizontal, each on a separate shelf. This is when a real rack comes into its own. There are a variety of shelves available (some that slide out, some statically mounted, etc). Adding or moving a shelf is just a matter of 4 or 6 bolts. Most server class hardware has available rackmount addons (all of my Suns do). Another factor is cable management, currently I have a mess of wires all velcroed together... good racks come with cable management built in, and it is usually fairly cheap to add to a rack afterwards even if it doesn't come with it. And note that if you shop on ebay, or can find a good local remarketer/recycler (one who buys stuff from closing companies), then rackmount hardware and even the racks can actually be cheaper than buying wire shelving brand new. My 7 foot tall wire shelving unit cost me $350 to build... I have seen full racks, with side panels and everything, for $150 or so on ebay. What kills on these things is the shipping, so finding a local remarketer or ebay seller like another poster mentioned is definitely a good idea. You could double the price of a rack with the shipping charges.

    5. Re:Don't *need* a rack by tap · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but I just rackmounted a beowulf cluster at work that was built in those things. It had 19 mid-tower cases, one two of those wire racks. One of the racks had two 1000VA and two 1400VA UPSes on the bottom.

      The wire racks were nice, and didn't cost much. I was able to run all the power and ethernet cables though the shelves. The spacing on the wires is just enough to fit the small end of power cord though.

      Our server room is full, and we wanted to get some more equpiment in it. So I figured, rackmount our existing cluster. I bought a bunch of 2U rackmount cases with no power supply for $125, a 42U enclosed cabinet for about $1k, and another $700 for sliding rails to mount the cases on. The servers use the old slot 1 pentium3 CPUs, which won't fit in a 1U case. I re-used the power supplies out of the mid-tower cases to save money.

      The cabinet takes about 2/3 the floor space of one of the wire racks, and the cluster was using two wire racks before. It's also a lot easier to slide the servers out on the sliding rails than it was to get those stuff off the shelves. Sure looks nicer too.

    6. Re:Don't *need* a rack by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I started with the steel wire shelves. But eventually I went rackmount anyways. It is just plain cooler looking.

  26. Rackmount @ home = bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rack mounted PCs are not built for home use. Their cooling fans are deafening, so if you don't live alone you'll either have to sacrifice a room to them and keep the door shut (which then might lead to cooling issues), or risk driving your housemates insane. You' be better off buying a few small form-factor systems, like Shuttles or a small ATX case with only the drive bays and slots that you plan to use.

    You could also go the virtual machine route and buy one extremely tricked-out machine and a copy of Virtual PC. Microsoft appears to be using it for multi-machine setups when they send out training and demo CDs now, so having several real PCs to do testing and training is no longer necessary.

    1. Re:Rackmount @ home = bad idea. by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

      I have a 4U rackmount system for my Audio studio. The fans that came with the case and mobo/CPU were loud, so I replaced them all with quiet fans. The fans that I use are temperature sensitive and their RPMs depend on temperature, how accurate they are I don't know but they are quiet and I have no overheating problems. The most noise comes from the fan in my mixer which I can't easily replace :)

      I guess cost will be the determining factor.

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    2. Re:Rackmount @ home = bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't make assumptions about other peoples homes! Rackmount servers are not found in typical family living rooms, I don't think anybody is suggesting that. My air-conditioned computer room has a rack; switches, KVM's, UPS's and five computers to compliment the 3 desktops.

      My cable ISP makes assumptions about myself and my home; that I would ever own a Microsoft product, that I can set up a windows machine infront of my STB, that I am calling the clueless support monkeys for technical help and not just to instruct them to fix their network problems...

      It's offensive that people pre-judge others according to sterotypes.

  27. 4 post racks... by MrChuck · · Score: 5, Informative
    I have a couple data center racks (no, thank you ebay). proper 4 post 19" racks.

    They provide a fair amount of silence too (a bit of foam along the sides where it doesn't obstruct air flow dampens it a lot.

    There's a switch, a terminal server, a patch panel, a router (IOS testing mostly), and 7 computers.

    The patch panel is new and GLORIOUS. It means I have all the serial ports and network ports and ports for the rest of the house in one panel.

    3 of these computer have rack ears. I found rack sliders, put 3/4" ply between them to make a pull out shelf and have a couple Sparc20s, a NeXT and an SGI sitting sideways on them. beneath is another shelf with 2 tower cases sitting there.

    Why not all rackable computers? mainly cost. An $80 case with an enermax or antec power supply (I'll *only* use Antec, but enermax was acceptable when it came with the case. The rest are crap. 5V should not be 4.6V when the graphics card get hammered). 2U rack cases (cheaper than 1U cause you get a bit of headroom and can use regular RAM) cost several hundred. The ones I have I got from a dot com moving from dozens of random machines to dozens of the same damn machines. I won; they became maintainable.

    I like 4 post racks. The shelves made it easy to put stuff in. Relay racks (just the front ears) work for many people to. If you have another room for the 'puters, then you can consider it. Shouldn't cost more then 120 Euro really.

    Make your own
    Any pro audio store (PA systems, not CD players) can tell you where to get rack rails. All my pro audio gear was rackable and I have several 4U (not deep enough for 'puters) road cases. So go buy a pair or 3' tall rails and build a nice box out of HEAVY ply. It will meet all your needs. If not, any carpenter should be able to build you a box for a few quid.

    1. Re:4 post racks... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      I hate to be off-topic, but why do you consider Antec to be better than Enermax? I thought most people would consider Enermax to be better than Antec as it commonly puts out more power per rail than Antec.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    2. Re:4 post racks... by michaeln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (reposted from an old Ask Slashdot on almost the same topic)

      I needed a cabinet that I could use to house a server, a hub, and my stereo. I used plywood for the bottom, top, and two sides. I used oak for the facing to reinforce it, and left the back open. I wanted something presentable so I used biscuits and wood glue to hold it all together.

      I bought a pair of rails from MilesTek and for the back rails I used aluminum from Home Depot and drilled my own holes. In retrospect, that was a bad idea, you'll save yourself a lot of trouble by just buying two sets of rails. It's good to have a solid metal frame built before trying to attach it to the wood part.

      It's not quite finished yet, I plan to either use glass or perforated metal for the door.

      Here here is a picture.

      If you don't care about aesthetics, it would be a lot less trouble to buy something from Ebay or a government auction.

    3. Re:4 post racks... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I have had an Antec, but it couldn't maintain contstant voltage, so I took it back for another one, same deal. Then I gat an Enermax, but the fac exhaus was at top, where it would be aganist my case, so I took that one back, got a generic brand, and some cash back, and it has been running quite, and cleanly ever since. So I have no idea why Antec or Enermax have such a rep.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Go mini. by supabeast! · · Score: 4, Informative

    I spent some time looking at this found found a few flaws in using standard rackmount systems at home. First, the damned things are long; often extending to the full 36" deep that a standard IT rack holds. Rackmount systems are also very noisy, because they incorporate small high-speed fans.

    For home systems, you would be much better off just using mini-itx. For some ideas, take a look at http://www.mini-itx.com.

    Another option to consider is XBoxes, especially if you're handy with a soldering iron and can install mod chips yourself. Buy it for $150, add some extra RAM if you need it.

    1. Re:Go mini. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how are you going to add RAM to an Xbox??

    2. Re:Go mini. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Its doable, just might not play games anymore. Fine if your using it as a $150 linux box tho.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Go mini. by Seekerofknowledge · · Score: 1

      You can't really add more ram to the XBox, because the it doesn't take DIMMs. The RAM is a single chip soldered to the motherboard. I know there is a space for a second RAM chip, and you *could* solder on your own second ram chip (I guess leading to a grand total of 128meg), but I think this is just beyond feasibility.

      Of course, if 64meg is enough, well then so be it. Also, Linux would have to be enough too (no Win32 possibility).

  29. Here's a great project for your inspiration. by Lord+Graga · · Score: 1

    It consists of lots and lots of Mini-ITX boards :D

    Click here :)


  30. Cheap Sturdy 44U rack by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

    I snagged my rack here:
    http://www.gtweb.net/rackacc.html

    It was cheap (~$350) compared to the big name branded racks and it's pretty darn sturdy.

    I snagged some 1U SuperMicro chassis way back when and went to it.

    My Rack

    1. Re:Cheap Sturdy 44U rack by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

      Oops. I meant 22U @ ~$300.

  31. Racks... by Yonzie · · Score: 1

    Well... IMHO, you don't want anything rackmounted.
    Rack cases tend to be comparably expensive and have lots of loud fans, which isn't so nice at home, unless you put them in the closet or something.

    I would consider getting a few of those Shuttle `lunchbox' type computers (or a knock-off). You can even choose between AMD, Intel and Via for the CPU.
    I saw on some pic from a convention a 6x-2.5"-disk hotswap case that fit in a CD-ROM bay. This might be available by now.

    Of course, there's the coolness factor of being able to say you have your own personal rack at home.
    If going this route, you can get small racks (like 10u) with doors, ventilation and whatever else you want.
    I'm sorry, but I really don't know where to get this kind of stuff in the UK or US.

    This could have been a FP... instead I chose to write something useful. You should all do this kids.

  32. This is easy.. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Just use these...

  33. Metro/Metro-knockoff shelving... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not an actual rack, but many people seem to do well with standard enclosures (or bare hardware on insulated mats) on the good ol' wireframe shelving stuff. Perhaps you could rig up something respectable enough with a few simple 'desktop' form-factor cases.

  34. Ghetto Rack baby by Hardwyred · · Score: 5, Informative

    When we did our house, I had a choice. We could afford a rack, or a few ebay rack mount cases (the 30 dollar 4u jobbies that were around a little bit ago). We went with the cases and I built a rack out of 2x4s and 1x2s

    --
    www.linux-skunkworks.com
    1. Re:Ghetto Rack baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Best solution posted yet. Exactly what I did to fit my couple of rackmount servers, switches and UPS.

      Except I went the next step, and got two squirrel cage blowers (low speed, low noise), encased it with plywood, used some of that foam with the ridges on the inside (with enough room on the sides for some airflow), made some zig-zaging baffles with plywood, and lined them with that foam (the bottom two feet are baffles and fan space, with two sets of baffles on the top--there's also a regular furnace filter installed in the bottom. Very nice to keep all of the dust and shit out), and had the local glass guys order me a tripple pane window that would fit the front. Painted the result OD green, and put some of the Korea era jeep stickers on it, very badass looking.

      I went the extra way because those damn rackmount servers are damn loud. No, actually the switches are louder. But anyway, it's in the basement, and despite being in another room, it could be heard in the entertainment area, which was unacceptable. It's pretty much silent, now, the most that can be heard is the moving air, which is just a little breeze (but it's pretty warm!) I haven't studied the airflow, but it seems to keep everything cool enough.

    2. Re:Ghetto Rack baby by Phattypants · · Score: 1

      That is hard core brother. Hats off to ya.

      Now, could you see a setup like this hidden in a closet or even in the drywalled confines of one's walls?

      Mm, I can. Stealth computing to the next level!

  35. Bah, organization is for the office... by YetAnotherAnonymousC · · Score: 1

    ... I'd need to start folding my clothes and doing my dishes before I started worrying about organizing my computers! =)

  36. Do we need this kind of humor here? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We geeks are not the most loved of social groups. A lot of this has to do with our condescending attitude towards less intelligent non-geeks, personal hygiene, and general social antipathy. Also evident in geek behavior is a strong misogynistic stream that infuses our vocabulary and humor with words and phrases that degrade women as a social group.

    On an individual basis, you'll find that most geeks are not this way and in fact have female friends whom they see as neither a sexual object nor as a lower form of life. Most geeks are also socially adept, physically active, as well as capable of striking up a conversation with members of the opposite sex (or same sex for those who may be homosexual).

    However the stereotype remains. I believe that this stereotype is reinforced by comments of this sort that takes a very simple request for "rack mounted computers" and turns it into a joke about female breasts. Not only is the joke unfunny, it is offensive to those of us who work hard in the offline world to build an image of the typical geek as a hard worker, community-minded citizen, and generally good person.

    The parent comment took no thinking on the poster's part and was apparently the first thing he thought of when he saw the question. This kind of geek whose thinking has become as anti-women as this is exactly the kind of anti-geek-community person that brings the rest of us down. I ask the moderators to take the long view and think about what kind of image of geekdom they wish to present to the world when they moderate the parent comment.

    Thanks for reading this far. I've had to get this off my chest for a long time.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...rant deleted...

      Thanks for reading this far. I've had to get this off my chest for a long time.

      Don't you mean: I've had to get this off my rack for a long time?

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    2. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's also a stereotype that geeks have no sense of humor and get really hung up on tiny details.

    3. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by RollingThunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I 100% guarantee you that the Marketing, Sales, and other "normal" guys would have turned it into a breast joke FASTER than geeks would.

    4. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What I'd like to know - and I'm dead serious, is why seeing a woman as a sex object is either insulting or demeaning?

      It's not a bug, it's a feature! We're supposed to work that way!

      Because you see a woman as a sex object (which really means you don't see her as an "object" at all [unless you're really kinky!] but as a potential sexual partner) doesn't mean that that's all you see in her or that that's the only interest you have.

    5. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. And Very well put. It even agrees with the ladder thoery.

      Face it. Most men would screw anything that had two legs, and even remotely resembled a female. Some men would even go for things with more legs or none! And you know what? Many women are the same way, but they'd have you think differently. You see, they know that we wanna get in their pants, and indeed we do, but the fact that most of the male popluation thinks that women don't wanna get nasty puts the ball in their court--a huge advantage.

      Geeks aren't an exception, no matter how much they might think they are. Instinct makes the decision most of the time.

    6. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by JPriest · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sounds like you really bring in the chicks. Do you have a girlfriend? Does she let you touch her boobies?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    7. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most geeks are also socially adept, physically active, as well as capable of striking up a conversation with members of the opposite sex

      LOL, excellent work.

      ..:: tHa tRoLl h0le ::..

    8. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Not only is the joke unfunny, ...."

      Your opinion.

      If you could only say jokes everybody approved of, this would be a sad world.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On an individual basis, you'll find that most geeks are not this way
      I don't mean to take away from your message (it's a good one), but: is presenting anecdotal evidence as fact also a sign of geekdom?
    10. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean you've had to get this off your.... Doh!!

    11. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you know, someone's gonna crack the "pot calling the kettle black" remark, and it's going to turn into some sort of racial epithet, merely because it had one thing calling the other "black", and the remark is only about hypocricy, NOT a racial slur.

    12. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by commie_coder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i agree we don't need this sort of humour here, but for different reasons. to protect the image of geeks? i'm indifferent on that score. the reason i think this humour sucks: because women are oppressed.

    13. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by lemonjus · · Score: 1
      This kind of geek whose thinking has become as anti-women as this is exactly the kind of anti-geek-community person that brings the rest of us down

      Oh... shut up .

    14. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job -

      yhl yhbt hand

    15. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by DarthTaco · · Score: 1

      We geeks are not the most loved of social groups. A lot of this has to do with our condescending attitude towards less intelligent non-geeks...

      ...The parent comment took no thinking on the poster's part and was apparently the first thing he thought of when he saw the question


      Hence proved. It would seem you are of the former, stereotypical group.

    16. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one of the funniest single lines I have ever read on the Internet. Kudos!

      --Anon. Coward

    17. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, I am so certain that this one roadblock has held back all the world's beautiful women from devouring this website and embracing geekdom in its fullest...blah

      It would seem that precious few share your bogus sentimentality, either because they aren't weak at the knees or are spending their time discussing silicon, as geeks tend to do.

    18. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women aren't as oppressed as they are indifferent. Those who want to succeed, pay the price in hard work (like the rest of us) and do so.

    19. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lighten up, Francis

      Sgt. Hulka

    20. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are? Where?!? How can I save them? Will they reward me for freeing them?

    21. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      It's a joke. You're not supposed to take it seriously. I doubt he took his own comment seriously.

    22. Re:Do we need this kind of humor here? by chthon · · Score: 1

      I think that women's lib in the past 30 year have put that idea in everybodies mind.

  37. Milestek by Chaos1 · · Score: 1

    I recommed milestek (www.milestek.com) for the rack. I have one at home, and we have 4 in the office. They are well made and competitivly priced. They even have half racks and sell the individual rails when it comes time to extend that half rack to a full...

    I believe they also sell enclosures.

    --
    I only need the Preview button when I haven't used the Preview button.
  38. Power Requirements by man_ls · · Score: 1

    Easiest way of dealing with the power problems would be to buy another power supply when you move.

    Equipment "made" to run on 60Hz/110v but *can* run on 50Hz/220v works, but it wears out quicker, from what I've heard. The slower sine wave screws the switching rectifiers up, makes em work harder, thus they wear out faster.

    1. Re:Power Requirements by dogsbestfriend · · Score: 1

      >

      Really? its the first I've heard of this - most of my computer and audio equipment can run on either.. wonder which side of the pond will it 'wear out' faster on??!!
      pure baloney.

  39. Rackmount is a bad idea for this by Zenin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aside from the "kewl" factor, rack mount systems for the job described will be very expensive, underpowered, incredibly noisy, and of limited expandability. This is mostly because if you're talking about saving space you pretty much have to be talking about 1U systems, which sacrifice a lot for their form factor (thinness).

    What's a better plan?

    I'd recommend Shuttle mini-PCs or similar (a few makes are available now). Hugely cheaper then rackmount, much quieter, better expansion (two or three internal hard drives if you don't use floopy or CDROM), and honestly SMALLER then 1U systems. Remember as thin as 1U systems are they are 19" wide (before you add the rack which adds a few more) and are typically very deap (20+ inches often). They are also much heavier then Shuttle systems. Furthermore, so long as you stay away from the mini-ITX based brands (Via, yuck!) they have every wiz-bang feature you could ask from a full size PC (duel channel DDR400, hyperthreading, USB 2.0, Gigabit lan, firewire, etc, etc) built in (see the Shuttle X in particular).

    You'll have a much easier time moving three of these small boxes around (get a small carry-on suitcase) then a 4U rack case, and your ears will thank you.

    --
    My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    1. Re:Rackmount is a bad idea for this by toast0 · · Score: 1

      The Via C3 processor has encryption acceleration, which can be helpful, and you can get them in passively cooled configurations, which will help with reducing fan noise.

      Depending on what his needs are, a Via processor might be a good choice.

    2. Re:Rackmount is a bad idea for this by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 1

      My /. uid is better then your /. uid
      Pretty sweet, huh.

  40. Not really true, check their catalogs... by name_already_taken · · Score: 3, Informative
    You're thinking of an effects rack. There are pro audio rack cases that are plenty deep enough.

    I have a JBL rackmount amplifier sitting in my living room right now and it's over 22" deep.

    Most pro audio rack case manufacturers make cases that are deep enough to accommodate most rack mount PC systems.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  41. Consider vmware.. by RedPhoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a P3-700 box that currently has three Linux, a Win2k, a WinXP and a Win2003 partition running under VMWare.

    Heck of a lot nicer than having to worry about the noise, heat and space requirements for the 6 physical systems I would require.

    May be worth considering.. Disk space can be managed reasonably well, and as I am only actively using one (or perhaps two) systems at any one moment in time, each box claws it's way out of swap into real-memory pretty quickly and provides pretty reasonable interactive performance.

    Red.

    1. Re:Consider vmware.. by RedPhoenix · · Score: 1

      .. also keep in mind that bochs is getting better every day. (bochs.sourceforge.net)

      Red.

    2. Re:Consider vmware.. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      WHAT???? Bochs emulates the x86 CPU! What about Plex86 (http://plex86.sourceforge.net/), if you want to run Linux?

    3. Re:Consider vmware.. by RedPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Nice in theory. I've been following plex86 off-and-on for many years, but the project hasn't done much since mid 2002.

      It was taken over by someone else, and did actually release some stuff in mid 2003, but seems to have died again since then. However, a bit of the plex86 technology seems to be migrating into Bochs.

      Red.

  42. Try Wal-Mart by rustycage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wal-Mart has a selection of rack mount severs. Look pretty cheap to me.

    --
    No Sig For You
    1. Re:Try Wal-Mart by fractalrock · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart.....selling server equipment? What the heck? I am seriously shocked. I thought it was a joke until I followed your link. When did this happen? I wonder if they do a brisk business...

    2. Re:Try Wal-Mart by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's for the motherboard, PSU, case, and MAYBE optical drives. No CPU, no RAM, no HDD - those are underneath the server's link.

    3. Re:Try Wal-Mart by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0

      Someone slipped me a Mickey, I'm trippin out man. Wally World with rm gear?? Damn man, I'm trippin, trippin, trippin, trippin, trippin.............

    4. Re:Try Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I sense a great disturbance in the force...As if a thousand network admins spontaneously burst into flames and Sam Walton again walked the earth.

      *shudder*

    5. Re:Try Wal-Mart by Rupert · · Score: 1

      Nice troll. If I click on that link I'll see a really old guy in a blue vest bending over and showing us his ...

      Wait...

      They really are rackmounted servers at walmart.com! Would you effing believe it!

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
  43. long distance video? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    I've thought of, when I get a house, putting my computers in a rack in a closet (if I can get adequate ventilation in a closet), or at least putting the computers in another room, for less noise, and just having on my desk a mouse, keyboard, DVD+R/RW drive, monitor, and speakers.

    USB2 with chained hubs can go pretty far, so that covers the mouse, keyboard, and drive. Long audio cables are not a problem, so that covers the speakers (alternatively, I could use a USB "soundcard" and have that on the desk).

    However, video seems to be the biggest problem. What's a good way to run video a reasonable distance? (By reasonable, let's say as far as USB2 for Firewire through the maximum number of allowed chained hubs can reach).

    1. Re:long distance video? by Tassach · · Score: 1
      However, video seems to be the biggest problem
      Video is by far the biggest problem when it comes to putting a computer in another room. There's really no cheap way to run a VGA signal an appreciable distance with any kind of quality.

      Basically, you need an enterprise-grade KVM system. Systems like this aren't cheap, but they do let you run 1600x1200x24bit video over standard CAT-5 cable with no ghosting. If you've got the money (or if you can find them cheap at an auction) this is the way to go. If you don't have the money, you have to make due with VNC, X-terminals, MS Terminal Server, or similar system.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:long distance video? by CoolQ · · Score: 1

      There are devices designed for just this purpose. They will allow you to send video + USB (+ maybe sound) over a single Cat 5e cable. They seem to work pretty well too. Here's one such device, though I've also seen them from Compaq and others:
      http://www.iogear.com/main.php?loc=product&product _id=380
      --Quentin

    3. Re:long distance video? by persaud · · Score: 1

      Use a quiet, low-power, diskless PC as a X terminal, booting from a live linux CD or the network via PXE. VNC will connect to your Windows boxes. X takes you to your Unix boxes. Gigabit ethernet for the network. DVD and sound can be attached to the terminal machine. KDE has a networked audio server.

      It may be possible to have multiple video cards, monitors, mice and X servers running on a single diskless "terminal".

      The human sensory system is extremely sensitive to latency. Keep your bio-silicon interfaces as local as possible.

    4. Re:long distance video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will probably never get read, but for what it's worth, I've had success using "low loss" vga extention cables. (I ordered mine from cyberguys.com) These cables were big and beefy like the ones that are part of the monitor, and NOT like the ones you usually see with KVM switches.

      At work, I have a computerized time-clock where an LCD monitor is mounted in the wall in the hallway about 20-25 feet from the computer running it in the server room. (The vga cable runs from the bottom of the rack into the ceiling, through the ceiling and down the wall to the monitor) I initially used two 20 foot low loss vga cables, and then replaced them when a 50 foot cable became available. In both cases, I was able to get a clear signal on the monitor at that distance as long as I kept the refresh rate at 75 Hz or higher. Higher resolutions were more susceptable to flicker, but for what it's worth, 1024x768 @ 85Hz is pretty much rock solid through the "low loss" vga cable even at 50 feet.

      I'm willing to wager that if you have a monitor and video card that can handle 90 to 100 Hz refresh rates, you ought to be able to use a 20 or 50 foot vga extention to without distortion.

      Cheers,

      Q

  44. Syncronicity strikes again! by Cervantes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Talk about timely... I just installed my rack-mount at home this weekend. :)

    Now, admittedly, it's a fully enclosed lan case, but still...

    I got lucky with mine, in that I work for a company that sells all types of office supplies, including PC stuff, and I got the 6.5' beast for all of $10(CDN)... but I have seen them floating around for relatively cheap prices, especially as offices move and go for freestanding racks instead of enclosed cases.

    Why an enclosed case? Noise is the big one. It's just worth it to have as much soundproofing as possible when you're running multiple PCs. It also looks cleaner, stopping prospective nerd-chicks from saying "I was going to do you, but your wires are all messy!". And, finally, it allows for nifty modding (word to the wise: If you're going to cut holes in the 2mm steel side with a Dremel, be sure to wear non-flamible clothing. A, uh, friend told me... yeah).

    For cases... well, I considered getting a few 2U cases... but then I thought of noise, and cost, and it just wasn't worth it. I'm just now (literally, just took a break to let the dust clear) building my own cases our of 1/2" wood. Given the size of my rack and how I'm laying things out, I'll end up with 19" x 19.5" x 6" cases, more than enough to hold a full ATX board, 2 CDs and 2 HDs (and floppy [the drive, not the rabbit]). If you didn't need many externals, you could fit 2 ATX boards in there.

    Cooling? I'm buying an 80CFM, 0.5 Sone air transfer fan... I'll hook all the cases up via dryer venting and PVC pipe, and the only noise in my entire case will be this one uber-quiet fan, and 1 PSU per case (which is made of sound-dampening wood). As I figure to max out at 3 cases, I expect excellent quietness.

    Access? I hinged the side door of the case for easy access, and my case layout has all the hookups on the side of the case, not the back. Much easier when, say, you want to change mouse cables, or hook up a USB device. Sure, you think you won't do much, but whether it's rack or case, do you really want to be fiddling around back trying to plug a cable in without unplugging the other 150?

    Interface? Forget rack-mount monitors and keyboards... get a KVM. They're cheap, easy, and I've had very few problems with any I've used. At high res they do ghost occasionally, but I only notice it now when I look for it. I'm currently using an Avocent Switchview 4-port, and it has behaved itself quite well. (Don't get a manual switch... autos are just all around better).

    Overall, though it was a bitch to get here and get fixed up, I'm already happy now that it's in place. Instead of having 3 PCs with 2-3 fans each, 2 laptop docking stations sitting behind me looking ugly, and all my networking EQ sitting with it's wires hanging out, I have 1 fashionable case, with blacklights and other esoteric touches, that my cats can't run through and knock over, my roommates can't fiddle with, and no-one complains about unattractive PC equipment. It's quieter, more convenient, and damnit, it just looks cool!

    The bottom line? Don't bother with rack rails and expensive, ugly cases and your wires flopping out in the breeze.... pick up a full rack case and build your own boxen. And remember, it gives you the best pick-up line a nerd could ever ask for... "Hey baby, wanna see my huge LAN rack?"

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    1. Re:Syncronicity strikes again! by squidgyhead · · Score: 1
      Do you have to worry about heat issues in a wood case, ie things getting yet uglier when cooling systems fail and things get too hot....

      Also, I imagine that wood provides for a pretty poor Faraday cage, so your computer is now more exposed to external E/M fields. I could see this not being significant, perhaps. I'd still worry about it, personally. Perhaps you could add a wire mesh to the case to get around this.

  45. What happens in real-world "contact centers"... by wilsong · · Score: 1

    ...we can't find a shelf for the rack. So someone hammers-in some bit of metal that doesn't quite fit, and we perch 2 sun blades and a dcp on top.

    Keep it real, dood. Balance it on some bricks.

  46. Why not stack a few XBox's... by thx2001r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That way, you've got as many as you want, $150 each, running Linux... life is good! Get a decent switch and away you go! And, they don't take up too much room or make too much noise... just get a table and stack 'em.

    --

    -Joe
    If we're all god's children, what's so special about Jesus? - Jimmy Carr

  47. Power Supplies by Dark+Bard · · Score: 4, Informative

    I notice you mentioned switching the power supplies. Do be careful when you come to the States. I did a location in New Zealand and took my systems with me. I asked around and everyone said no problem switching the power supplies from 110 to 220. When I hooked everything up it fried two out of three motherboards and cooked one CPU. When I came back to the States I didn't take any chances and switched the power supplies. Power supplies are a lot cheaper than motherboards. I'd do it and call it cheap insurance. For under a hundred bucks US you can swap off three power supplies if you do the work yourself.

    1. Re:Power Supplies by harveyswik · · Score: 1
      You didn't say, did you bother to switch the input voltage on the power supply?

      (little orange thingy on the back)

    2. Re:Power Supplies by funky+womble · · Score: 1

      There are no switches on most recent European power supplies (they're either ~230v only, or auto-sense).

  48. mini-itx by kraut · · Score: 1

    Why don't you build something with mini-itx (http://www.mini-itx.com/) motherboards? I reckon you shold be able to fit a bunch of them into a small-ish flight-case... in fact I'm itching for an excuse to do that anyway. Which would give you three, or more, server PCs in very little space. Not the most powerful systems in the world, but cheap & quiet.

    --
    no taxation without representation!
  49. It stars out innocent... by telemonster · · Score: 5, Funny

    It starts out innocently... then another rack, then another...

    Old pic:
    old picture

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    1. Re:It stars out innocent... by stor · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like this one

      If I started doing rack-mount in my house, I'd end up with that. I simply have to restrict the number of concurrently-running computers in my place to retain any semblance of a sane environment.

      Often the first thing a woman says when she walks into my apartment (usually with a matter-of-fact-but-obviously-unimpressed tone): "Gee, you have a lot of wires".

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  50. Don't Rackmount: Stackmount... by nweaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You sound like the perfect candidate for a small-form-factor arrangement, either a couple of Via Epia systems in very small boxes, or low end Shuttle cubes.

    This gives a nice compromise: Much lower cost (racks are expensive), LESS volume in practice (Racks are DEEP, its hard to find a deep storage closet, but small form factor systems may be taller but aren't as deap), and easily available.

    True, reliability isn't as good, but you aren't talking about ultra-reliable systems anyway, and you said you didn't need high performance.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  51. I've got one by silentrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    24Us of rack space. I recommend anything by Middle Atlantic. Solid construction, good quality. My 24U cost approx $600 (they don't seem to get much cheaper, new that is).

    Bit of advice, though... You might seriously reconsider building a rack. I've only filled up a little over half the available space, and now that the novelty of 'having a rack' has worn off, I'm thinking about selling it and all the racked PCs that I don't use.

    In other words, don't go through with it unless you have a strong need for it now and in the future. The rack equipment is expensive, as is the rack mountable cases.

  52. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

    I have a tiny little table/desk beside my racks to hold the kyboard/mouse/monitor. I use an under-the-table type keyboard tray. The whole thing is about 30" wide and is a lot more comfortable to work at than standing at a rack. Plus, Racks have a tendency to fill up really quickly once you get 'em so you leave that little bit of extra space open for the good stuff.

    TW

  53. Why not go VM? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead of 3 separate boxes ( with their associated power issues, OS issues, maintenance, etc ) to deal with, just get one really nice one.. and run VMware on it..

    It should be cheaper, for a home user.. and has other advantages as well. Such as easy manageability, quickly recovering blown systems after a bad test, changing OS's on the fly..

    Just make sure to get tons of RAM ( which is cheaper then an entire machine )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Why not go VM? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you can get 16GB into a single athlon64
      dual cpu m/b, q.v. the review article on the tyan
      and iwill boards referenced by a slashdot article
      yesterday. One of these would be worth a whole
      rack's worth of 4U p3-850s.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  54. Why Not. by tarballedtux · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see why this is such a bad idea. Especially if they can be set up as mainframe to a bunch of dumb terminals spread throughout the house. It is only natural that the ways of corporations 30 years ago be used in the home today.

    --tarballedtux

  55. Yeah get.. by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a Dell rack system.

    Don't forget to ask them about the complimentary ear protectors.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  56. Free 20U rack on wheels, pick up only by LinuxHam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Eastern Pennsylvania. Any day, any time. You gotta help drag it out. Contact me. Bring a pickup truck. Used to house ooooooold DECtalk gear. Still has 1 4U DECtalk unit installed, if you ever wanted to do text-to-voice with DTMF readback over 8 phone lines at once.

    I also am a strong proponent of virtualization if possible. I'm up to about 15 virtual machines running under VMWare ESX, and I started a new box intended to run Linux VMs using usermode linux. Now that "virtualization" is a key buzzword for 2004, I don't think I'll ever get around to populating the rack with gear. Get it out of my house.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
    1. Re:Free 20U rack on wheels, pick up only by The+Z+Master · · Score: 1

      I may be interested depending on your location (I also live in eastern PA) and the viability of transporting the thing (ie, what are its dimensions?).

      How should I contact you? I don't really trust slashdot as a personal communcation medium.

    2. Re:Free 20U rack on wheels, pick up only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A silly little exercise in information hiding:

      november - 59 1/2" tall
      three - 21 1/2" wide
      victor - 30 1/2" deep
      zulu - I have the original metal rear door, but the lid stretched up 1/2" while it was being pulled upstairs
      lima - so unless you can squash the lid back down into place,
      at yahoo - the rear door can't reach the anchor hole in the rear of the lid and is useless.

      The lid doesn't look grotesque or anything, it just sits 1/2" higher than it's supposed to.

      Bonus points if you can find my location without any help! Shoot me an email, and we'll hook up if you still want it.

  57. Low Cost Rack Mount -- for two systems by kd3bj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want two systems in 2U of rack space, the lowest cost way to go is a 2UX2 case. You can use standard processors and cooling fans. Standard ATX power supply, etc... No CD-ROM, but you can use USB for media.

  58. Cobalt Raq anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've got one working as a testbed database server. They're pretty cheap on ebay, not very deep, not terribly noisy and they run Linux.

    What's not to love?

    They're fairly low-powered, but for testing/proof-of-concept, etc., they work plenty fine for the money.

  59. My two cents by value_added · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Rackmount equipment generally costs more.

    2. The space you'll save is directly proportional to the extra airflow (read "fans") you'll need. The smaller the unit and/or the more stuff inside each unit, the more fans you'll need and the more noise you'll end up with.

    3. A 4U unit is about the same size as a tower PC. Invariably, a 4U is designed to use more fans than a typical tower PC and as a result will be noisier. A typical 2U unit is designed with 3 mid-case fans, and an exhaust fan (in addition to the fans on the power supply fan and the processor). Swap out all the fans for the quietest replacements you can buy, and you'll still end up with something you'll want to put in another room or far away from where you work.

    4. Rack enclosures are expensive. Audio racks and relay racks, while cheaper, are NOT appropriate for any number of reasons. You can, however, find budget or used enclosures (still not cheap), just as you can design your own (a week in the garage). Rack accessories are also expensive. You can find a Slashdot article on the subject of enclosures here.

    If by home use, you're implying you intend to put everything in a specially-ventilated and sound-proofed closet or recording-studio grade enclosure, another room, or basement, I'd say go for it. If not, you'll regret it.

  60. On Topic Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just buy a 4 foot painted aluminum 19" open telco rack. Put heavy duty rubber casters on it. Install an APC SmartUPS 1200XL RM in the bottom of the rack . . . will keep the rack from tipping over. Tie the rack to the power ground of the feed to the UPS for static dissipation. You can then rack-up three or four 19" rackmount cases, with plenty of room to spare for a rackmount ethernet switch or a router at the top.

    We use them at all of our ISP POP locations.

    1. Re:On Topic Response by aminorex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget to ground each case independently.

      Man o mister, ground loops suck to debug.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  61. I've done it...here's some advice by tyrani · · Score: 5, Informative

    My home rack has been working great.

    First, be carefull about where you put it. Mine is tucked away under the stairs in the basement. A 19" rack fit perfecly in the closet that I built around it. I have an automatic dehumidfier and some (motherboard based hacked) temperature sensors, and a bathroom ventalation fan. When I'm in the basement, I can't hear anything at all.

    Next, buy yourslef a CAT 5 KVM Extender. It is absolutly indespensable. I very rarely have to go down to manually press a button and the KVM extender has eliminated the need for an expensive rack mount keyboard and monitor. I just have a cheap KVM switch connected to my family rig in the den.

    I agree with other posters, go buy a 4U rackmount case and make sure that you have at least a couple of rack mount shelves for routers and other misc stuff.

    The neighbours all know that I work as a geek, but showing them my Rack when they come over demonstrates that I live like one too :)

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
    1. Re:I've done it...here's some advice by maw · · Score: 3, Funny
      rejected (19) accepted (0)
      Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?

      "literate"

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    2. Re:I've done it...here's some advice by tyrani · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes. I've been a subscriber to the "I write C better then English" camp since my teens :)

      I suppose the flamer in me would say, "Learn to form complete sentences. Then we can compare styles." Although, I'm happy being me. Doctors have poor hand writing and good coders can't spell.

      --
      rejected (19) accepted (0)
      Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
    3. Re:I've done it...here's some advice by maw · · Score: 2, Funny

      It wasn't meant to be a negative comment on your writing. Viz, you write too coherently; therefore your submissions are rejected. :)

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    4. Re:I've done it...here's some advice by ganiman · · Score: 1

      Next, buy yourslef a CAT 5 KVM Extender. It is absolutly indespensable.

      Those things are great.. but be careful how long your CAT5 cable is. If it gets too long, you will see your mouse lagging. It does not meet the same distance specs as network equipment.

      --
      geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
    5. Re:I've done it...here's some advice by tyrani · · Score: 1

      Good thinking. I used some slightly more expensive CAT 5 in my home. When I ran my wire, I decided that the extra money was worth a little bit of extra shield. The last thing that you need when using vi is a fuzzy screen :)

      Of course, it goes without saying that as with regular network runs, you must be very careful about power lines. I worked hard to stay as far away from them as I could.

      --
      rejected (19) accepted (0)
      Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  62. Is it worth it? by talieos · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Racks tend to be large, ugly and noisy. Plus the racks and cases are expensive.

    Consider getting desktop cases and putting them in a cheap stereo cabinet?

    Some of the new mini-atx, and smaller cases from Antec (like the Minuet) and Shuttle would be quiet and fit the bill.

  63. Why not just build your own? by borwells · · Score: 1

    I'm not very good at building things like this but my Brother works for a local fab shop and they built it for me. They charged me for the labor but even with that it cost me a grand total of $100. I filled it with cheap home built 1U systems from Supermicro, a rack mount UPS and switch from ebay. Build Your Own Rack Cabinet

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
  64. My personal experience.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple years ago I decided to build a rack for my home servers because I was tired of having them stacked precariously on a desk, and also was adding some Cisco rackmount equipment to my collection. I didn't have the ability to mount the rack into the ground or wall, so decided to go with a rack on wheels. I found a company on the web that sells some very durable racks (http://www.rackmountpro.com, no personal affiliation). Although I bought my 3 computer cases from another company, I did get their 36U model and it has worked out perfectly. I was able to assemble it myself and it has proven to be very durable and stable.

  65. Re:FOIRST PRST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wesley Willis Fiasco forever!

  66. Not optimal, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just purchase a standard 19" rack for telecom. You can get some short ones, around 36" tall.

    Mount it to a chunk of 3/4" particle board (or steel plating) to keep it balanced..

  67. Why rack? by javajoe99 · · Score: 1

    For 3 PC's why bother with a rack? Go vmware GSX -- $2500 will easily support 3 virtual machines on a AMD Athlon 1700+ with a gig of ram.. Unless its just the spare heating you want in a rack.. I know form experience with a 42U rack in my den. If you go rack go all the way Rack, KVM, racked ups, rack monitor/keyboard/mouse and a switch. For 3 machines I would go gsx myself cost in the short term out weighs the long term costs and increased elecriticy and cooling, unless you want your own private data center.

  68. My recommendation: A4F 19-1HE by j.leidner · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hi,

    I can only fully recommend the Mappit A4F 19-1HE , which comes in a black chassis ready for a 19" rack. I bought my first one recently, and it's doing a great job. This box is ideal for servers run in private homes, since they are low-energy consumption (low-$$ when run 24/7 like mine) and low-noise (can live in a corner of your living-room without being noticed).

    It's built by a German company, but they shipped it to the UK quickly and hassle-free, so they might as well ship to the US.

    A friend of mine, who had first recommended the Mappit series to me, runs a set of smaller ones. All solid metal cases, and Linux/BSD installed easily (no 'Microsoft tax').

    > Rackmount? For 3 pcs? Something small? ... ATX!

    Yes and yes -- luckily, that's not a contradiction at all.

    Happy Easter, all!

    Jochen
  69. VM Ware Virtual servers by Secahtah · · Score: 1

    We have some rack-mounted vmware servers which we can install several concurrent operating systems on where I work. If you're looking at Win32 deployment, consider getting 2003 Server and using terminal services into it, or Windows XP and remote desktop. If linux, it works really well for that too. The systems are Dell poweredge servers. I think they were about $5000 each (including the vmware license).

  70. Use Mid-towers by gvc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I run a couple of dozen PCs with a couple of terabytes using garden-variety mid-tower cases sitting on 2 parallel steel shelving units with an aisle in between.

    The backs of the machines are to the aisle and I have a common keyboard/monitor/mouse setup with long extension cables that I swap as necessary.

    I run Linux so I only need the keyboard and console in exceptional circumstances. If I were forced to run Windows, I would use VNC and a similar setup.

    Each machine has 4 ATA hard drives and no CD. For system setup, I do a network install initiated from a floppy. All other maintenance is over the network.

    While this setup is a little bit clumsier than a rack system might be, it is far cheaper because it is built 100% from commodity components.

    1. Re:Use Mid-towers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While this setup is a little bit clumsier than a rack system might be, it is far cheaper because it is built 100% from commodity components.

      19-inch racks, rails, cases, and their components have been commodities longer than any other PC form factor. I predict they'll still be commodities 10 years from now.

  71. Been there, do this... by $ASANY · · Score: 3, Informative
    Rackmounts are great. My linux server/router is in a 2U rackmount enclosure, and I'm pleased with the form factor, the extra fans, and the huge amount of space available for hard drives. Since most network cards are half-height, it's no problem to put multiple ethernet cards in the box. What made this easier was that this case was something I got on eBay -- it had been a load balancer and had multiple RJ-45 connectors on the front. Rather handy for my purposes.

    Rackmounts of the 1U and 2U variety are handy when you can get them with the connections in the places you need them. Most have connections in the back, which for a geek is a bit of a pain since it means moving stuff around a lot every time we need to change something. A few have some important connections (or all of them) in the front, which makes for supreme ugliness but really handy to work on. Other than that, you need to pay attention to the size of the expansion cards you plan on putting in, as a riser card (to allow full-size cards in a 1U or 2U case) can often be more expensive than the cards you're planning to install.

    At 4U cases and larger, it's pretty much the same size of a regular case in a horizontal configuration and at a fair premium over a standard case. Rarely are there any additional features other than for cooling. Unless there's a need for hot-swappable drives or something like that, it's not terribly useful.

    Remember that 1U and 2U cases tend to be a fair amount deeper than a standard case, which yields somewhat about the same case volume as a cheaper standard case. So unless you have depth available with how you want to set it up, it can case trouble. But if you need to stack things up, stuff someting next to ceiling joists, or have a dedicated 19-inch width area for electronics, you're not saving yourself much. When that's the case though, this is a really great solution.

    And it looks cool too. My $400 linux server/router sitting in a box that says "Intel NetStructure Traffic Director", which probably cost ten times that much. I feel like someone who has a car kit where they turn a VW bug into something that looks like a street rod.

  72. The surplus market is your friend... by KC7GR · · Score: 4, Informative

    The used/surplus market can really be your friend once you get to the States. Some areas are better supplied than others. For example, the Seattle area has RE-PC, which bills itself as the largest used/recycled computer place in the northwest (probably true -- I've not found any other computer surplus place in the region quite so large). I see rackmount cases and parts turn up there all the time, at both the retail locations, and the prices are generally pretty cheap.

    The SF Bay Area part of California has a generous supply of used electronics and computer places too numerous to list in any detail here. At the risk of load-testing my web server, I have a page at this link that lists all the Bay Area surplus places that I knew of as of my last (annual) trip to the area in 2003.

    I would, however, like to point out one place in particular in the Bay Area. Weird Stuff Warehouse has to be seen to be believed, though their prices can be a little on the high side, IMO.

    I also have store and swap meet listings for the Puget Sound region and the metro Portland area of Oregon.

    Outside of the retail surplus scene, amateur ("ham") radio swap meets can also be excellent sources of such parts. I bought my original rack case from one of the Bay Area events back in 2000, and it is still serving me well today. You can search for hamfests close to whatever area you'll be moving to at this link.

    I hope that helps. Rackmount stuff is great fun, and scrounging for it (and other parts) even more so. Definitely part of the "Tinkerer's Spirit."

    Enjoy your travels.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:The surplus market is your friend... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I know some friends who bought their 19" equipment at ebay for reasonable prices.. As with all professional equipment, dumpsters are your friends also :).

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:The surplus market is your friend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell sx-270 is very small form factor (size of a dictionary.) Laptop disk, but I think it's got usb2 and firewire. You'd need a four-bay external encosure, perhaps. Mine has DDR and 2.4 GHz Pentium, nice little box...

      Four of these side-by-side would be small, quite, fast, and cheap.

  73. Alternative to rack mount. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You might want to consider virtual machines as an alternative. See www.vmware.com.

  74. Blade Center by jargoone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take a look at IBM's Blade Center. While it might be overkill for your application, they have a number of strong suits. You can fit up to 14 system boards in the chassis, each having 2 CPUs. The chassis itself is a 7U unit, which is quite small considering what you can put into it. It has a dedicated system management system. And the best part is the cost -- the chassis will set you back at first, but the system boards are quite reasonable after that. There's a refurbed one on eBay that has the chassis with 7 system boards, each having dual Xeon 2.0Ghz, at $9,800 Buy It Now. A lot of money, yes, but trust me, you can pay more than that for a single low-end 1U unit new from IBM.

  75. OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Rack mounted hardware is hideously expensive to begin with, not to mention fairly ugly. If you honestly need discrete hardware for testing the system I would suggest considering used laptops (or even new laptops), get several identical units. Benefits of laptops over rack mounted hardware :
    Built in battery backup.
    Discrete hardware so you can use it like a regular computer.
    Very quiet, low power consumption.
    Reasonably priced compared to 19" rack mount machines.
    Get a spare hard drive and carrier and the laptop serves double duty as a personal laptop simply by swapping out the drive.
    Stacks easily.

    You can get new Dell laptops for under a grand apiece including upgraded hard drives and memory.

    That said, I suggest you give VMware a serious look. It has a 30 day shareware trial version (full feature) and will let you run multiple virtual machines on the same computer - memory limited to 1G across all the VMs on one physical machine (ie you could run four 256M machines or two 512M machines or eight 128M machines at the same time, or mix and match.) Networking is emulated very well, as far as the virtual machines are concerned they are all real machines on your network, in fact all the real machines on your net will treat them like real machines also.

    Total cost for VMware = $300 for the software and enough to fill your existing computer with another Gig of memory. If you are doing prototyping or experimental work it is really something worth looking into.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Sad+Loser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely the way to go: I used to use just laptops for the same problem - now I use my own laptop with VMWare - that way I can devleop stuff at work/ home/ university.

      The other big plus is that if your virtual machine falls over in a big way, you just load up a new virtual machine, and away you go.
      It also solves the problem about testing with multiple client OS's.

      I certainly agree that you need shedloads of memory - 1 Gig is the minimum to run a couple of guest VMs and a host OS without your machine swapping all the time.

      --
      Humorous signatures are over-rated.
    2. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by 88autocross · · Score: 5, Informative

      Instead of making stupid comments regarding VMWare or laptops, here is something that will actually help you out. I just completed my rack a few months ago. Building a home rack is not that expensive but you will need to look around because most of the rackmount products are business oriented and they seem to be more expensive. Here are the links to the stuff I used. Some of the prices may be slightly off (previous slashdot post) but you should be able to track down most of the stuff. I do agree with the posts regarding the 1U servers it will be much easier for you to stick with 2U and up servers, the extra space makes it much easier and cheaper to work with. Some of the links are not quite working (l-com and bestbuy) but I think it is from problems on the vendors website, hopefully they will work tomorrow or I will post new links.

      Relay rack 38U steel, with base (should fit under a doorway with casters)
      129.00 - Rack
      60.00 - Base(Freestanding Application)
      40.00 - Casters

      Rackmount Computer Case
      130.00 - Computer Case
      30.00 - Power Supply (300 Watt)

      LCD / KVM Switch / Mounting (need to make custom rack mount for LCD Swivel)
      1200.00 - LCD Monitor (21")
      41.49 - LCD Swivel [cyberguys.com]
      119.95 - Rack Mount KVM (8 Port)
      18.99 - KVM Cables [techdepot.com]

      Rack Mount UPS
      249.99 - UPS 1500VA CyberPower 1500AVR(free shipping from BestBuy, easy to return if problems, not cheapest price)

      Hope that helps,
      Jad

    3. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but if you're going to buy a 21 inch LCD for so much, you might as well throw a few more bucks out for a quality name brand. My opinion anyhow.

    4. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by jezreel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using a similar case, probably an older version, and had a pretty hard time to stuff 4 hdds and a DVD-RW in it, definitely no more space left then. Consider that before you buy ;)

      --
      0 001 11 1
    5. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if someone could recommend a few good sites in Switzerland to buy this stuff from, that'd be great! These things are unbelievably expensive here!

    6. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Rack mounted hardware is hideously expensive to begin with, not to mention fairly ugly.

      Cheap hardware is hideous and prone to not ever working properly, this is why rackmount servers use decent boards, memory and drive controllers. Desktops are ugly, I gave up and went rackmount after 3.

      Benefits of laptops over rack mounted hardware [...]

      Laptops don't use regular hardware, are not designed to be stacked (hint: this is why rack systems were invented), are a pain to service and are hideously overpriced.

      You can get new Dell laptops for under a grand apiece including upgraded hard drives and memory.

      Or a brand new bottom end rack unit for 500, even a 64bit box for just over a grand!

      One of the datacenters I've written code for runs dual 1u dual XEON racks for it's back end. I don't really think VMware cuts the mustard when it comes to emulating dual processor SCSI RAID boxes, for database work. Good luck with your laptops!

    7. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cheap hardware is hideous and prone to not ever working properly, this is why rackmount servers use decent boards, memory and drive controllers.
      Agreed.
      Or a brand new bottom end rack unit for 500, even a 64bit box for just over a grand!
      Uh-oh... you won't get decent gear for that price, you're just buying those same shitty clone desktop parts stuffed into a cheap rackmount case with a crappy small power supply.
    8. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To save money the company I work for bought a couple of dells and runs 8 VMWare machines each - it means we can offer 'dell hosting' to our clients but it's dirt cheap. We have racks but we'd need a lot more if we had to use real machines to do the work (Yes it's unethical but cheap is important to that company.. they told me to bootleg devpartner and gave me a week to do it rather than pay for a copy to solve a bug - which was holding up a $300,000 contract... go figure).

      I'd expect for a home machine one box with lots of memory would be cheap and do the job unless you're running really CPU intensive tasks.

    9. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Call JS Custom PCs in Cincinnati. Excellent pricing. They'll build or supply parts only (same price either way). Check 'em out.

      http://www.jscustompcs.com/

    10. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Total cost for VMware = $300 for the software

      Actually, VMware is now only $199 (boxed) or $189 (download). They reduced the price a while ago.

    11. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh-oh... you won't get decent gear for that price, you're just buying those same shitty clone desktop parts stuffed into a cheap rackmount case with a crappy small power supply.

      500 GBP will get you a cheap rack using crappy parts was what I meant by "bottom end". rainbow-it (site currently down?) will sell you a low end (IDE based) single processor opteron box for just over a grand. Personally I'd spec SCSI boxes - from around 1500 a piece. Reading it again, I'm not sure if the OP was joking, laptops indeed.

    12. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by andrewa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks, that's very detailed info. Individual systems, rather than VMWare is certainly the way I want to go, as there will be a lot of CPU intensive processes, also I want to do some physical testing (such as pulling cables to see reactions, etc.) so for me, real sytems will be better.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    13. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Informative

      www.halted.com

      They just had some $99 4U atx cases, and $50 2U cases (with PS no less).

    14. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by whitelabrat · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I agree that VMware is a low cost, compact and easy way to set up a testing environment. The particular nice thing is that you can all of a sudden decide that you need 4 or 5 test systems, and add those immediately at no significant extra cost. Or you can switch easily from one sandbox to another as needed.

      VMware is actually having something of a sale right now where you can pick it up for about $189. Couple that with something dual processor and 2G+ ram an you should be ready for action.

    15. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by DoctorHoe · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if you're just looking for cheack rackmount pc systems head over to colomachine.com. I use them at work and they have never given me any problems.

    16. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by icedtang · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really do not understand how the VMWare option could be called stupid. Not only does VMWare make software testing easier, you only need to have one machine to power on and maintain.
      With VMWare you don't need to re image your whole computer when you want to start things over again. I have been using VMWare GSX since version 1.0.1, and have found that testing software on VMWare has saved me a lot of time and effort. With the ability to take snapshots, have non-persistent hard drives, and being able to start everything over just by copying a few files makes me thing VMWare is perfect for this kind of thing.
      The only stupid thing here is to not be aware of your options.

    17. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by NecroBones · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been doing the rackmount thing at home for nearly a year now, and I have to agree, it can actually be very cost effective if you shop around and considering getting some of your components off of eBay.

      I've found a nice cheap source of basic rackmount cases/chassis at http://www.plinkusa.net/

      I'm fond of this chassis: http://www.plinkusa.net/web2025.htm

      It's 2U but still accepts a standard ATX PSU, and is only $137 after adding shipping and rails. You can very easily fit standard desktop components into this formfactor. The only flaw is that the two internal fans in the med-section of the case have circular holes in the chassis that aare cut in such a way as to produce a loud whine. If you cut the remaining metal out with a case-cutter tool (or dremel or something) and replace it with a basic fan-guard, it'll run quietly.

      They also offer very inexpensive 4U cases, and some attractive 3U models that still accept a full compliment of upright PCI slots.

      For KVM, shelves, and other accessories, eBay has been my friend. Mildly used parts can often be had for significantly cheaper than retail, such as the rackmount surge-protector I managed to find, nearly new, for about 80% off of the retail value.

      As for the UPS, I would always buy APC. They're simply the best. I've had nothing but troubles with the few Cyberpower UPSs I've worked with. Granted, they were the desktop models, but after having them fail within weeks *repeatedly*, I vowed never to buy a CyberPower again. I went with a 1500VA 2U APC SmartUPS, brand new... Pricy, yes... But very capable.

      --
      I have not lost my mind... it's backed up on disk somewhere!
    18. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of making stupid comments regarding VMWare or laptops

      Wow - I don't know you so I'm going to play the Hanlon card and not attribute that to malice.

      That said, if I was dead set on going with rack mount gear I would consider a Blade Server. I had a hardon for these a year or two ago when they first hit the scene but there was no way I could justify the price - but this discussion has prompted me to check eBay for Blade Servers The second hand market has picked up a little and the individual Blades are actually fairly cheap - under $500 for new in the package old stock with some running under $350. You will also need a Blade enclosure to stick them in. Sounds about exactly like what the OP was interested in ... in fact I may consider some for myself.

      I guess if you are going to put in a rack, might as well do it up right and get some of the toys like a Blade Server and what have you. Hell, throw a Gig of memory in each of these and run VMware on them, get the best of both worlds.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    19. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by ngrier · · Score: 1

      After much searching, I've found these guys seem to have the best prices on rackmount cases. Particularly nice is the included riser card and the option for an AGP card for those who (for whatever reason) need AGP capability -- few places I've found offer that. Note, though, that the prices are noticeably better on eBay than through their online store.

      PartsExpress has good prices on rails, for those who just want rails. Their customer service was quite good as well: one of my pairs of rails managed to fall out in transit and they were quite good (prompt and friendly) about sending me another pair. Their selection and prices on other basic rack equipment was quite good as well (blank plates, shelves, that sort of thing).

      For those doing home wiring and wanting any range of supplies (including rack-mount hardware), I would highly recommend Tri-State Electronic. I had a several page order which they got right the first time and shipped out the next day. Their prices are quite good as is their selection. Also delivery was reasonable ($50 or so via UPS Ground for over 100 lbs in 3 boxes) and fast since they're in the middle of the country (= no more than a few days away from most everywhere). I've since ordered some things I forgot the first time and the service was just as good the second time.

    20. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by 88autocross · · Score: 1

      Sorry to come off like an ass but yesterday but I read through the entire post and 99% of the posts were not helping the guy solve his specific problem of building a rackmount computer system. So I vented a bit of the frustration when writing the post. My apologies, Jad

    21. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by pAnkRat · · Score: 0

      UPDATE:

      the latest version of VMware (4.5) suports a total of 4 Gig Ram.
      ( 3.6 Gig max for a single Machine)

      So you can have 3 1.2 gig machines, or 12 300 MB machines, or whatever....

      Just to let you know..

      --
      we need an "-1 Plain wrong" moderation option!
    22. Re:OP: Consider used laptops or better yet, VMware by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Holy shit - I don't know what clown modded this down but I almost missed it. This is amazing news - consider this a meta-mod back up.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  76. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by lks_aus · · Score: 1

    "Also bear in mind your electric capacity with where you place it. In my experience you'll get around 6-8 systems for a LAN party on your standard 15 amp outlet before blowing the circuit. If you can put it on a circuit that is as isolated as you can make it."

    I have lan parties regular at a friends place and we get 18 people on the one 240v/10A circuit no problems with room to spare as well...

    If you shop around you will find what you need for a good price... it may just take a while to find

    --
    Warning: Excessive usage of stupidity may be harmful to your health
  77. Rack Mounted PCs for the Home User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got lucky. A company I had connections to
    dumped a bunch of older equipment, and I managed
    to get a very nice full size rack, for free!

    that said...

    rack stuff is more expensive, though it's getting
    less so.

    put the rack on casters, and make sure that they
    are rated to carry the weight of your rack
    maxed out with equipment.

    I love this. Combined with hard floors, it
    makes it very easy to pull the rack away from
    the wall to make changes, or clean under it.

    *** Make sure the combined height is less
    than the doorway. This will allow you to
    move it out of the room for painting or other
    room maintenance. In fact, when I got the
    rack, I put my desk and two file cabinets on
    casters, too.

    Get rails for the cases. I leave the case lid
    screws off, too. Makes it very easy to slide
    out the cases and pop the lids for changes and
    maintenance.

    Be sure to make cables long enough to
    accomodate the length needed when the cases
    are fully pulled out.

    Tiewrap cables that can be pulled out,
    (i.e., usb, keyboard, mouse) to the back
    of the case to act as strain relief when
    sliding the case.

    Check the alignment of the rails that the
    equipment screws into, left to right, front
    to back. Use a couple of 2U blanks at the
    top and bottom.

    When I built my first rack case 5 or 6 years
    ago there weren't as many choices, seemingly,
    for manufacturers as now, and I over did it
    with a big Sliger. Since then I've built a
    couple more using Compute-Aid 4U boxen

    http://www.compute-aid.com/

    which are well built and fairly priced,
    though it's been of couple years since I checked
    them out.

    Heating isn't a problem with 4U cases.
    ATX mobo's leave plenty of room for chassis
    fans. Cases frequently can be ordered with
    a cross brace that accomodates additional
    chassis fans.

    Try and keep the heavy stuff near the bottom.
    For me, top to (near) bottom:
    ham radio stuff
    17" monitor for the router box
    (I'd love to change this to an lcd,
    but they're too much money)
    mini-keyboard for the router on sliding
    shelf
    1U shelf for the dsl box
    1U shelf for the 8 port hub
    workstation 4U box
    old workstation now file server 4U box
    router 4U box
    APC rackmount UPS (heaviest of all)

    That's all I can think of.

    Good luck

  78. so what by ModernGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    I got a rackmount enclosure and some rackmount equipt, it's awsome despite the markups, find a good deal on eBay. My ProLiant 5000R and 24 port switch has all the guys at the lug envying me.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they envy you with a POS Compaq 5000r? says a whole lot for _your_ LUG

  79. Corrected URL [A4F 19-1HE] by j.leidner · · Score: 1

    The first URL should have read: http://www.mappit.de/content/computer/bilder/a4f19 /a4f19_cd.jpg (image) / http://www.mappit.de/ (homepage)

  80. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Listen to this guy.

    Go with 4U rack mount cases. They are cheap, and easy. They will fit all your standard hardware out there.

    For the rack itself, they can be expensive new, but you can get them used often enough. Look on ebay and find one in your vicinity. My friend got a nice compaq 42U rack for cheap that way.

    If you can't wait, you could do as one has suggested and use a 19" audio rack. Just make sure it's deep enough; some audio racks aren't deep enough to fit some computer cases.

    If you're on the cheap, get yourself a cheapo belkin KVM and hook up a small monitor and get a cheap keyboard/mouse combo and put it in the rack on a rack shelf. After that, you can most likely do everything else over the network, so you shouldn't have to use it very much.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  81. DRMO or surplus sales by pvera · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office (DRMO), an agency that DoD uses to get rid of surplus equipment. All of the armed services use the standard 19" form factor and sometimes you can get lucky and find one at DRMO for very little money. You can probably refurbish one for the cost of a couple cans of paint, maybe a power strip and a couple fans.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  82. SuperMicro Super Server by zerofoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Supermicro makes super server barebone systems that are very nice. I've got a bunch here at home and at work.

    Check it out here.

    Building your own 1u box is a pain. Just try to find motherboards, power supplies and 1u cases that all work together. You'll find it is not easy. Intel makes some boards and cases that go well together, but they are pricey. A super server from supermicro includes:

    Case (1u, 2u, 3u,....and up)
    Power Supply (no reliablity problems so far)
    Floppy and CD-rom/DVD drives
    and
    Motherboard that fits the case correctly.

    All you need to do is add CPU(s), memory and hard drives. This way you can choose how much "horsepower" you need with out all the system integration hassles.

    Good luck.
    -ted

  83. A server? Why don't you try an Axentra box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an Axentra box 2 months ago and I never had any problem with it. A real KISS box. And now, they just introduce three new models with AMD chips (www.axentra.com). It's not rackmount, but it's small, and it works.

  84. Rack-mount desk by soren42 · · Score: 1
    I've been using an Omnirax Commander desk for about 7 years now, and I absolutely love it. It's very convienent to have the 19" racks built into the desk, along with a slide-out keyboard drawer, and space for up to four 21" CRT monitors on the desk.

    A few things to consider:
    • Rack equipment (cases, accessories, etc.) is much more expensive. It is typically a 10-20% over equivalent, non-racked equipment, but tends to be more industrial, durable, business-class gear.
    • The desk itself was also very expensive. When I purchased it from Mars (a large music chain store) in 1997, it cost me ~$1700. It has, however, proved to be worth every penny, and I've moved it four times with me now.
    • There are issues to keep in mind with racks that aren't such a big issue in a non-rack environment. These include cable management, power/network distribution, KVM distribtion, and related problems. Some examples include problems with where to plug the keyboard and mouse into a rack setup - the front or back - and how long do your cables need to be.

    If you think about it, and do your research, rack-mount equipment is the way to go. It is certainly more expensive, but the extra money will buy you reusability and longer life.
    --

    "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
  85. Don't Virtualize - here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Regardless of what people are saying here - do not just show up with one large machine. If you are demoing a product to sell to people to put into their environment, you'll likely run into "will it work behind a firewall?" (that is if they have any clue about security). Can't do that with yjust virtual machines.

    I buy stuff from
    http://www.rackmountnet.com/
    they've got a nice 12" deep mATX form factor 1U case that I put my firewall in.

  86. Here... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    A couple of these with some Epias and off you go.

    http://servercase.com/miva/miva?/Merchant2/merch an t.mv+Screen=PROD&Store_Code=SC&Product_Code=GH1-10 6-9inches&Category_Code=1UE

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  87. check out gtweb. net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    they make a 1RU 15 inch deep rack case (they'll build it out if you buy all the components from them). I think that the case is called a firewall case. I've got about a dozen of them that we built out a couple of years ago. They don't have much expansion room, but they work perfectly fine for what we use them for. They don't have a cd drive and only have one slot for a hard drive, but if you use the right components that shouldn't really matter, right?

  88. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I find that plugging my laptop into the 240V circuit tends to make it really fly...from the ensuing explosion!

  89. Alternative to racks by linuxbikr · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you just need a three or four PCs for simulating production environments, why not look at getting a bunch of Mini-PCs like the Shuttle XPC line. These boxes are the size of a toaster and sit comfortable on a good size desk. You could easily fit four of these little boxes on a desk along with a monitor, mouse and keyboard, a 4 port KVM and a small hub. Doesn't weigh a ton and it is a lot cheaper than a rack setup. Very compact too.

    I have a Shuttle XPC for gaming purposes fitted with an Athlon XP 2800+, 512MB RAM, a DVD-ROM and an 80GB hard disk. For full featured computing needs in a small package, you can't beat it.

    1. Re:Alternative to racks by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I second that recommendation. Small form factor computers are very nice.

      I have a Soltek Qbic myself. It's a bit quieter than the shuttles, and there's space for two optical drives. It's also a tad bigger than the shuttles, though. It's a 2.6GHz P4, 1GB PC3200 and a Geforce4 Ti4200, BTW. Very nice for gaming, and it's much easier to lug around than my old steel case.

      It's also a very stackable-friendly design, and three or four of them stacked would be quite stable. They probably wouldn't take up much more space than a regular case, either.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  90. Supermicro by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It really doesn't sound like you need to spring for a rackmount system. It will cost you more in the end if you go that route. Still, if you want to, I would not build your own system. You'll drop a couple hundred at least on a rackmount case and $50 to $100 on a PSU for it. The mobo will be at least $300 since it's a rack mount mobo and thus a server mobo. Add in the 1U CPUs and fans and possibly short DIMMs and you'll find you could have spent less money buying a complete system. I recommend you look into the SuperMicro line. They have dozens to choose from. I have a 6013P-T and love it. I bought might from Wendy @ Acmemicro also known as 8anet.com.

  91. Checkout Skyhawk Rackmount Cases by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

    http://www.skyhawkusa.com/products.htm

    They sell 1U 2U 4U and 5U ATX cases for about $100, and I have been very pleased with mine. Sure it's probably not the best on the market, but it's pretty darn good for the cheapest. The rack itself is probably best bought used from a closing company. I got mine for $80 when my work closed an old building. Most tower cases start at $50+ these days, so it's not that much of a premium to pay.

  92. Re:FOIRST PRST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only do YOU FAIL IT!, but YOU FAIL IT miserably. This is more like the 17th post. Kill yourself now.

  93. if anyone is in brooklyn... by mattkime · · Score: 1

    i know where someone has thrown out a full height rack. two blocks from my place. interested? ask for details

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  94. Really Loud! by MichaelKaiserProScri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also, keep in mind that most rack mountable computers are REALLY LOUD (think "idling jet engine loud). The smaller the "U" of the case, the louder it is. Those 1U and 2U cases are jam packed with all sorts of stuff that gets hot. They compensate for that with high flow fans and those fans are LOUD.

    Also rack mount cases for the "build it yourself" PC's cost $100 - $150 more than standard cases.

    The "gee-whiz" factor is great, though.

  95. Been there, do this...Versitale MB's. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I would like to see is more versitale Motherboards. If you look at some of the server boards out there? Things are split up. The I/O and memory board are mounted horizontally (but seperate), while the main board is mounted vertically(1). Makes it easier to put the ports and cards were they work best. Not were the manufacturer feels they should go.

    (1) Put in a double wide tower case (with vertical divider) and go to town. HD RAID on the left (with two big slow fans), with MB on the right with floppy, and CD-ROM plus tape drive. With cooling shroud over the quad-cpu MB.

  96. Go old school! by bakuretsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The owner of a local ISP and collocation center that I'm friends with runs the whole operation out of his basement. He has a "rack" for all of his Cisco core routers and Sun Sparc systems (what you might call the infrastructure of the place), which he made by simply setting up two parallel 2x4 boards from the floor to the ceiling. They're secured to the floor with rivets (cement basement floor), and into the joists overhead with screws.

    Probably not the flashy solution you're after, but it holds the equipment perfectly and securely.

    It's actually quite funny to see that to your left, and to your right a full-on, professional, centrally-cooled Sun rack. His basement is geek heaven.

    It's NetPlex, by the way. Yes, he hosts a WinZip mirror.

    --

    --
    The Bailiwick - DESIGNHUB2005
  97. Why not just build your own?-Freezer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm...build your own? How about a cluster in an old chest style freezer? Quiet and cool, just don't forget to use lots of silica gel.

  98. My home rack setup... by OgGreeb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I operate a bunch of machines in a datacenter but do my sysadmin from home. As a result, I have a nice installation here, in a side room of my basement near my home office, connected to the Internet through a Covad T1.

    I use (2) 2-post relay racks from Great Lakes Case & Cabinet, they were ~$300 each. I bought 19" shelves, rack power strips and mini keyboards (that fit on a rack shelf) from Milestek (very inexpensive), and some used APC rack mount 1400W Smart-UPS (one per rack, mounted at the bottom). I did as others have done and built machines into 4U Siliconrax-Sliger SRCX475 rack cases. They are not quiet, but I haven't found them as noisy as others have mentioned.

    I used a 15" CRT for the KVM monitor (both because it was cheap and because, unlike flat panels, they will sync to many more video signals.). I'm using a Black Box ServManager KVM, and it works well, but I don't recommend it because you can do the same thing with cheaper equipment (Belkin). The relay racks are incredibly strong, and I've mounted quite a bit in them. Between the two racks I have several 1U switches, a firewall, the 4U ServManager KVM, a 15" Dell monitor I picked up cheap with the purchase of a server, keyboard, 7 mixed 4U and 1U machines, a 4U robotic tape jukebox, 3 2U power strips, and a 4U lockbox for storing loose bits. All the cables are run along the sides and behind the relay racks -- with a full installation I don't see the wires too much. The relay racks have the option of using casters, and while I didn't buy them, I recommend them to others -- it lets you roll the relay racks out to
    get behind them.

    I had an electrician run separate 15A circuits from my mains panel to each relay rack's UPS, and I also had him install a manual generator transfer switch and heavy-gauge cable to an outside junction box, so I can plug in my generator. (An aside -- if you are going to use a generator to keep things going in a blackout, put a cheap, low wattage light plugged into one of the UPS and turned off, so that it is available to be turned on so you can see what you are doing while switching over to generator and for general tinkering if the place you have your equipment doesn't have a light fixture.)

    It looks impressive to have everything mounted this way, and keeps everything tidy.

    --
    -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
  99. blatant plug: Silicon Mechanics by forevermore · · Score: 1
    Yes, this is a blatant plug, I work for this company, and I don't mind burning a little karma for the cause; it isn't often that a /. article relates specifically to my company.

    Anyway, Silicon Mechanics is a small-but-growing systems integrator (with some pretty large-name clients, but I won't drop names at the moment). We're (very) linux friendly (but sell plenty of Windows-based machines, too), specialize in 1u servers and our clients tend to think we offer the best support in the business. We're also pretty competitive price-wise (although there's no way we can compete with a build-it-yourself project, you do get what you pay for).

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
  100. Added benefit of the rack case... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

    built in work-surface if it has sliding rails. Usually access to components is extremely easy. This is great if you're in hardware tinker mode.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  101. Some tips by Belfy · · Score: 1

    People always talk about rackmount cases in a rack. I can see how this makes life a little easier, but in a sandbox is is hardly necessary. If you only need a few machines, I would recommend something smaller. Consider a half height rack, get some rack shelves, and mount regular ATX mid towers in the rack on their side. For power, just buy a good surge protector (or 2) and place them at the bottom, the standard cables will reach. Then get a good 4-8 port KVM and set a keyboard, monitor and mouse right on top of the rack (or do what I did and have the rack next to your desk so you can just operate it all from the best seat in the house.) It is not the perfect rackmount solution, but it is a heck of a lot cheaper to use a $25 Mid tower case than ANY rackmount case. Also, when you are ready to move, you have half the weight to transfer, and the surge protectors and power cables are the only thing you will have to replace when you upgrade your location. :)

  102. The trick is by jdkc4d · · Score: 1

    To find inexpensive equipment. If you want to go ubernerd, then you can download the standard demensions of a rack and build one yourself. If you are lazy (like me), you can just stack your cases on shelves. If you are just looking for cheap rack cases, check out www.plinkusa.net

  103. Making your own by MrChuck · · Score: 1
    except for the raw 2x4's and bolts next to your rack, it looks pretty nice. Good job. you may have an extra cookie.

    The best road cases, by far, that I ever saw were owned by the grateful dead. Not batteries Anvil cases, but what looked like handmade polished wood racks with canvas covers. But they can have nice looking things when they were on the road 200 days a year.

    You ponder showing plans or construction tips for those who follow (when this q is asked again in December?)

    1. Re:Making your own by michaeln · · Score: 1

      The raw 2x4's are part of the bed riser I built. They're not pretty, but they get the job done. It had to use bolts, so that it could be built, then disassembled, then carried in piece by piece in the middle of the night. (it's against regulations) It's a college dorm room, so space is at a premium.

      I don't really have any plans, but there are some more pictures of the cabinet in various stages of being built:
      the sides of the rails being assembled
      the internal assembly
      unstained
      the cabinet after staining
      what happens when you don't clean all of the wood glue off before staining
      the final product

      The only tips I really have are:
      1. Biscuits and wood glue are wonderful.
      2. Buy the rails, don't try to make your own unless you have a machine shop.
      3. Black spray paint does not stick well to aluminum. It scratches off with a fingernail. I think sanding the aluminum down first helps.

    2. Re:Making your own by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      I had an apt in an old brownstone in brooklyn after college. My room was what had been (LONG ago) the pantry. Lots of height, but about a futon + 1' wide. So I built a sleeping loft (a table, basically, with long legs).

      The landlord came by and saw it. "You build this without asking for my permission?" So I lifted it.
      It's not attached to your house, so yeah.

      Ok, 1 drywall screw into the wall to keep it from rocking, and a bit of foam between wood and walls to keep it from marking the walls or making noise.

      I boggle at some of the school "regulations" I've come across. I understand that the rooms have to survive decades of a new person every year, but we got yelled at for xmas lights on the walls as a "fire hazard" (er, ma'am? That little "UL Listed tag" suggests that it's ok to wrap around a dried out little tree that's waiting to burn.

      (we got a big win when she came into a student apt and declared a keg chained to a large metal sculpture to be a "fire hazard". The owner picked up the phone, dialed locally, described the setup and said: "My dad says it's not."
      What! I don't care what you father says.
      You might, he's the fire chief of the town.

      Hee hee.)

  104. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use racks and like them but I don't use them at home. I run a DP service out of home and use 30-40 small form factor desktops (not towers). I used to use a small form factor Compaq that I could stack 7 in less space than a 14" monitor. Now I'm using IBM PIII 800's that are selling for $250 referbed. If you really need racks because you are buying blades or eserver Ms, then I suggest you purchase them through your dealer, because there maybe reqiurements you are not aware of.

  105. Recycled story? (Yes) by dilute · · Score: 3, Informative
    The same article was posted in December.

    Here

    Deja voodoo.

  106. Scalable Rack by Ridgelift · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why rack mounted? Well, I want to save space and only have the bare minimum systems (no need for multiple CD-ROMS, monitors, no sound-cards, just lots of memory and HD space). I also will add to this in the future, so don't want to limit myself to just a few pcs on the system.

    I had the same idea you did, except it was for small businesses who wanted to start with a small rack system, then add later.

    So I had this built, a scalable rack. Since a standard rack is 42U high, I had it built to be 1/7th the height, or 7U. The piece sitting on the front is the cap for the rack top, and another 7U rack module is already installed, so the rack in the picture is 14U high (BTW, if anyone wants that synpotics 10Mb hub, they can have it for nothing...just gotta pay the shipping...it's heavy!)

    Unfortunately, there's not a lot of interest in a scalable, modular rack system. So there my prototype sits in fire engine red looking very pretty, but no buyers.

    1. Re:Scalable Rack by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

      Since a standard rack is 42U high, I had it built to be 1/7th the height, or 7U.

      Uhh....I mean 1/6th the size. It's a 7U rack, with the option of adding more 7U modules to expand it up higher to a full heigh of 42U (or I suppose even higher if you want :-)

    2. Re:Scalable Rack by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      The rack does not appear to be the right size for the equipment in it - which one is nonstandard?

    3. Re:Scalable Rack by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

      It's the right size. It looks wrong because the top cap sitting in the front is not bolted to the top. If that were installed, it would pull the rack together and fit the hub.

      It's just sitting in the corner of my lab because I needed a place to put it.

  107. Many of them switches don't work by Tangurena · · Score: 1

    Many of those little switches don't work. I've moved around the world a lot, and changing things from 220 to 120, and 50hz to 60hz is a real hassle. Especially when the cheapskates who made item X put a dummy switch in the back that is not tested. Or it is so cheap that it looks like it switched, but instead, the plasticy thing you touched broke internally making it look like the switch changed. So few people actually switch them that most suppliers can put in a dummy and no one will ever catch them. Buying power supplies locally is much safer. Plus you end up getting the correct power cords for the destination country. Just how many power cords do you think you have in your house? I bet you will underestimate it by a factor of around 4.

    1. Re:Many of them switches don't work by Joecuba · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just buy good quality PSU's in the first place, avoid the cheepo units and you won't have this problem

  108. bad for performance testing, bad for reliability by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative
    Get one big system and a VMware license... saves lots of space and hardware costs...

    ...and is absolutely useless for anything even remotely approaching performance testing, because you've got the overhead of the virtual machine software, and several systems fighting for CPU time, memory, and disk I/O(which is particularly a problem with IDE systems where disk I/O involves a lot of CPU overhead).

    you have one kick ass box.

    and if anything breaks, you now have ZERO working systems, instead of 2/3rds etc. IBM's big iron gets away with this because damn near everything is redundant and hot-swappable, so the machine never has to go down.

    I don't consider the parent answer particularly insightful, sorry...

  109. Server racks can cost more than audio racks! by jtara · · Score: 4, Informative

    It really isn't true that anything associated with audio gets an automatic 500% markup.

    I recently built a new workstation, and decided to built it in a rackmount case this time. I though it would neaten things up a lot to get my (rackmount) UPS and extra battery, server, switch, and all those pesky little boxes (firewall, cable and DSL modems, etc.) into an enclosed rackmount case. (That way, most of the cable runs are inside of the case...)

    After looking at surplus racks and not finding anything that I would have in my home (my office is in my dining room) I decided to splurge and buy a brand-new rack cabinet.

    I wound-up with a Middle Atlantic Products WRK-24MDK "presentation enclosure system" which is a 30" deep 24U enclosed cabinet.

    At about $800, it was less than similar products designed for the server market. (Which, IMO, has by far the highest markups!)

    There are somewhat more affordable choices available from Middle Atlantic, if is doesn't have to be quite so pretty. Particularly if you want a full-size cabinet. They also make some pretty nifty cabinets intended for in-wall roll-out installations, which are popular in home theatre applications.

    One thing you have to watch-out for with audio racks is depth. Most audio equipment is not very deep, and most enclosed racks for the audio market are not going to be deep enough for most servers.

    The cheapest way to go, if you are handy, or having custom furniture built anyway, is to just buy rackrails for a few dollars and build them into something.

    The next-cheapest is to use an open rack rather than an enclosed rack. These are commonly used in corporate server rooms where individual-cabinet security is not needed. Severs typically sit on center-mounted shelves rather than actually being mounted from the ears.

    And, yes, you can pretty easily find full-size and smaller racks on the surplus market (I found several locally) but they can be rough.

    Keep in mind that 1U servers are VERY noisy! (The smaller the fan diameter, the more the noise, for the same volume of air moved.) This is a consideration if this is in your home or even in your office if it is in a work area. If you are a build-it-yourself type, get 4U enclosures and add your own motherboard.

    I used a Chenbro RM412 case, which comes with a hot-swap SCSI backplane, and takes extended ATX mother boards.

    I added a 4U shelf for all of the little boxes, and got a new low-cost rack-mount gigabit switch. (An SMC 8508T)

  110. Your Reward for reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your reward for reading all the way to the end of this old thread is this link to exactly what you are looking for.

    You can either get a rackmount that is only 7" deep with a mini-itx motherboard or you can get a rackmount that is only 18" deep with two mini-itx motherboards. The prices are fantastic, too.

  111. Stay away from aluminum by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just buy a 4 foot painted aluminum 19" open telco rack

    Very bad idea unless you're mounting very shallow stuff or very tall stuff; there is a reason they call them "telco" or "relay" racks; telco/network gear is never very deep(long), unless it's also very tall, so it doesn't exert much outward pull on the screws. Think about the mechanics of it- and yes, it's not pretty when that 2U DB server with 4 very expensive SCSI disks makes Unintentional Ground Contact because the screws all stripped out.

    Go with steel unless you have a really good reason not to. Aluminum strips like a son of a bitch, even just installing the stuff if you're not careful (ie mis-threading a screw or even over-tightening it.)

    1. Re:Stay away from aluminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words . . .

      Center of Gravity!!!

      Surely the guy won't ignore the basic physics involved in mounting big cases with only front flange mounts. . . .

      And, I don't recall anyone saying to buy cheap racks . . . If they guy shops around a heavy guage (aluminum or steel) 4 foot rack should not cost more than $100-$125. Check out Newton or Chatsworth racks . . .

  112. Consider by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 1

    using the rack enclosures used by rock bands for their pre-amps and effects processors. They are a bit pricy, but usually are air-frieght certified which will help when you move. We built a 2 pc system for a customer in one of these and they love it!.

    here is a link to one

    --

    --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
  113. Computer Cabinet? by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

    Instead of rack mounting, how about a computer cabinet enclosure with slidable shelving plus a keyboard/mouse and monitor tray? I've been looking for something like this that accomodates 4 tower PC cases and has a ( quiet ) fan on top and bottom of the cabinet for air flow. That would give you some of the benefits of an equipment rack, but let you keep the PC's in standard cases, unless you really don't want to keep them that way.

    Anyone see a cabinet like this around?

    --
    I can't afford a sig!
  114. Lots of good answers.. by michaelhood · · Score: 1

    in this thread: not quite a dupe.

  115. Rack mounted vt100 terminal suppliers? by TokyoGuy · · Score: 1

    Hello on a related note I've been trying to find a 1U rack mounted vt100 terminal to connect to our equipment via a serial console server. Any advice on what to get? Basically I'm looking for a vt100 terminal equivalent of the rack mounted keyboard/display combinations you see for windows-based servers. Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:Rack mounted vt100 terminal suppliers? by kermit6306 · · Score: 1

      I have a VT100 LCD screen. It was made by Planar. They sold a rack kit with it. I'm not sure they still sell this stuff though. The other option is to get one of those laptop rack kits and get a cheap laptop and just run a terminal emulator. That's the better way to go IMHO; you get more flexability.

  116. This is hardly new nor high density by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It was a little bit of a surprise to me when I visited rackspace.com a year or so ago, but they have a very high density scheme with no racks to speak of.

    That scheme is most certainly NOT "high density". It is extremely LOW density; in the space of a dozen desktop machines(if that; probably more like 8), I can place FORTY TWO 1U rackmount systems. Uh huh. You read that right. That's not even as dense as you can get- the ultimate are blade servers, of which you can fit something like a dozen in 4-5U of space, complete with a built-in high speed network switch, KVM/LOM and power distribution all builtin to the case.

    Desktop cases are a HUGE waste of space in enterprise environments because everything you need is usually built-in to the server mobo; I've never seen a server with anything save a SCSI RAID card in a PCI slot. So all the space for 5+ full size PCI slots is wasted...

    Rackspace's 'scheme' is done when you have a)a boatload of space(because your target market is grossly oversaturated) and b)a need for as low a margin as possible(because your target market is grossly oversaturated and because it's low-scale, borderline consumer stuff, it's extremely price-competitive; in enterprise hosting, people ask about your financials before they ask about how big your genset is). Ie, Rackspace went the absolute cheapest route possible, and their customers will suffer as a result.

    Why? Well, first cooling in rackmount cases is excellent; it's piss-poor in desktop cases, usually...so expect hard drive failures. NONE of the components are easily swappable; instead of "pull machine out on its rails, pop the top, place new memory in, push system back in", you've got "unplug the machine, pull it out of the shelf because there's no clearance on any of the sides, put it on a workbench, pop the case, put in the memory, put it back together, put it back in the shelf, plug it all in".

    God help you if you need to swap power supplies- they're several screws and connectors all over the place; drives, fans, motherboard. You take 20 minutes, while I take 15 seconds to slide the lever, pull the PS module, put the new one in, lock the lever, and plug the power cord back in. Done, while you're on screw #2.

    Yes, not an issue for this fellow, but your implication that Rackspace is somehow engaging in innovative thinking is ludicrous. No professional hosting company would even consider such bullshit.

    And yes, I said professional; Rackspace caters to individuals, not corporations, and non-managed hosting- pretty much putting them a step above Joe and Bob's ISP, but not by much. I've worked for a commercial-only managed hosting company, and unlike Rackspace which let you "visit", it's an entirely different sort of place; customers don't set foot in the place, the building isn't marked, etc.

    1. Re:This is hardly new nor high density by Martyleach · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with you on this one, being a ex-rackspace employee. Even though I was mainly involved in the networking and security side, I still had to do general dc support work and changing anything in those boxes was a complete pain in the arse ! (I used to work for conxion before Rackspace, and certainly noticed the difference...)

      I'm not sure how the US setup worked from day to day, but we never let any unauthorized people inside the UK datacentre, not even the marketing people (!). I'm guessing this was because the US setup was (and is) ALOT larger and fully kitted out compared to the UK.
      Saying that, neither the UK or San Antonio datacentres were marked saying 'Rackspace' (athough this may've changed, as I left two years ago)

      Martin

  117. super cooling by olscratch69 · · Score: 1

    I know nothing about racks and servers but, could you use and old fridge and dehumidifier? Cooling and sound should be taken care of then all you have to do is drill holes for cable. It would be a little big. You could use any old pc and stack the inside if you leave the racks in the fridge.

  118. MICRO ATX Desktops by B4RSK · · Score: 1

    Why is everyone so wound up about Mini ITX? Damn expensive, and if they are just to be used as server-substitutes, not needed...

    Micro ATX Desktop cases are the way to go.

    Cheap, small, stackable, upgradeable, easy to work on...And quiet.

    I suggest these AOpen cases, along with an AOpen Micro ATX motherboard. AOpen even makes barebone versions of these.

    My firewall is housed in such a system and has worked out very well. I plan to add a few more for various other purposes.

    --
    Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
  119. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

    You do realize that most computer power adapters are dual-voltage, right?

    --
    01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  120. vmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe all that crap posts I see here? Did he ask for mini-itx people? Is he your pet moron or something?

    If you want emulation take a look at xenolinux, which can work for windows as well.

    I live with my rack cases, and they do save space. I warned my cheap friend in the beginning, and now he whines about all of the cases that he has littering his tabletops/underdesk and begs my to buy a few all the time.

    No, I haven't purchased a rack for them yet.

    Take care of the PSUs you pick, and buy your fans with quality in mind. (ballbearing) Also industrial PSUs are not like the ones you buy from Antec.

  121. My two cents by blate · · Score: 1

    Rack mounting your toys is great, IMHO. I don't do it (yet) at my home because I don't have very much stuff, but if I did, I would.

    There are a number of companies making "shorty" racks (that's my term, don't Google for "shorty"). They are normal 19" racks, but sit only 30 or 36 inches high. One I seriously looked at for work had a door on the front, too.

    If you just want to mount a couple 1-2U servers, a switch/router, etc., this would be a sweet way to go. You can tuck it undera desk or in a (ventilated) closet and forget about it.

    Rack equipment (particularly computer) is more expensive, apples to apples, compared to non-rack hardware, but it's compact, often better-cooled (read: noisy), and probably bare-bones enough for your requirements. Many of the rack computers I've worked with also have full BIOS support for a serial/TTY console, so you can remotely access the computer, reboot it, etc. You can gang all the TTY's into a terminal server (Cisco makes a couple models) or use serial-to-USB adapters and run them off of one box (just make sure it stays up :) ).

    Make sure you calculate how much rack space you need before buying a rack. Also, from my experience, you'll probably want to allow at least 20-40% extra for expansion, testing, etc. Also think about cooling and the cooling requirements of your hardware.

    Another benefit of a small rack is that if you move or relocate, you just unplug the rack from the wall and move the whole bloody thing with you. No recabling your equipment or lost toys. And, if you put a locking door on the unit and bolt it to the floor, it's pretty secure too.

    If this all pans out, let us all know and maybe post some pictures. I think this is a slick idea that more individuals and small businesses should seriously consider.

  122. Here is a cheap rack mount chassis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.aopen.nl/products/Housing/H800series.ht m

  123. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by blate · · Score: 1

    >>Go with 4U rack mount cases. They are cheap, and easy. They will fit all your standard hardware out there.

    This is a good point. Dell, in fact, sells "workstations" and "servers" that can be configured either as tower or 4U rack-mounts. You basically bolt on a couple rack ears and you're good to go.

    If you find the right size case, you can buy rack ears, drill a couple holes in the case (be careful about the metal bits!) and bolt them on. Rack-mount servers on a budget.

    If you're not much of home machinist, you could consider rack shelves -- I highly recommend that you find shelves that bolt on to the front AND back for stability. You can stack your tower/desktop systems on their sides. This gets a little messy if you ever need to move the rack, and it takes up a hideous amount of space compared to 2U systems (a shelf + tower consumes basically 5-6U of space), but it's an alternative or a way to rack-adapt existing hardware.

  124. Agree: small-scale solutions want commodity gear by Spinality · · Score: 1

    If you're talking about a small setup, i.e. less then a dozen systems, it's hard to beat the tradeoff of price versus slickness. Commodity systems in normal small form-factor towers and desktops are so much cheaper than rackmount systems, and it's really not hard to come up with a way to hook 'em up. True, your 'ideal' system can save on duplicate CD/ROM drives etc., and the cable runs look infinitely better, but this savings won't generally reduce your net cost.

    Get good standard systems, used ones if they suit your needs, and put 'em on a set of tables or shelves. If space is tight, use rack shelves and snug the systems in, but I've never looked at my CPU jungle and said "I need to invest a few thousand bucks to trim this down from 30 cubic feet to 12." I ALWAYS use that money to buy something I need more (or more likely I blow it on a nice weekend). Space per se is just not that big a problem, not as compared to power, cooling, and component diversity. Besides, I'll need to replace the systems in a year or two anyway. And I'd probably be better off with more commodity systems, especially if I'm trying to duplicate field conditions.

    (Unless you find a source for CHEAP rack mount gear, in which case obviously we'd all pick that. It does look much more engineeroid.)

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  125. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative
    Painted mine black, but whatever floats your boat... :-)

    Good points all around in parent post. Additional thoughts from my own experience:

    As others have pointed out, another problem with 1U/2U rack cases is the noise. They typically use 40mm/50mm case fans, and the sound of those poor little guys whirring their hearts out is like living in an airport. While you might be able to tolerate this with a single computer, once you stack up 3/4/5 machines, the noise levels can become remarkably unpleasant. After 3 months of insomnia, I chucked those cases in the closet and replanted everything in 4U cases. (I've since seen low-noise 40mm Pabst fans popping up every now and then -- the airflow is much lower than the turboprop-wannabe stock fans, but I'm tempted to pick up a few of these, bring the 1U case out of storage, and give it another shot -- for a minimal single-CPU/single-drive system, the reduced airflow should still be sufficient.)

    4U cases, OTOH, are much easier to quiet down. These typically use 80mm or 90mm case fans, and many have mount points for a couple of 60mm fans on the back. There's a variety of low-noise 80/90mm fans on the market. Not quite as wide a selection in the 60mm range, but they're not particularly difficult to find if you need the extra airflow. (FWIW, I've been happy with the Vantec Stealth line.)

    The parent poster's comment about 4Us taking standard power supplies is good to keep in mind. The PS in a 1U/2U case is going to be a nonstandard size -- which can be a killer if it dies on you. With the standard-sized ATX PS used in a 4U case, if you lose a PS you can pop down to your local computer supply store, buy a replacement, and be back up and running in no time.

    If you're running Linux, you can manage without a KVM once your machines are set up and running properly, since you can always forward X sessons from multiple boxes over to whichever machine your monitor is connected to. That being said, a KVM is awfully handy if you need control over a machine during the early boot stages -- you can't get to the BIOS settings display using X forwarding. :-)

    Personal preference I've developed regarding rails is to use the 26" rails even though most 4U cases are only 20" deep. The longer rails make it more awkward when you first put the case in the rack (since they stick out past the ends of the case), but afterwards they'll let you slide the case out far enough that you can get to the connectors on the back. (Like flipping off the switch on the power supply or unplugging the cord while you're working inside the machine.) I find that being able to do all the work from the front of the rack is more convenient than having to hop back and forth between the front and rear to yank things off and plug things back in again. If you rarely work inside your case, it's not a big deal -- save a few bucks and go for shorter rails, or even skip the rails completely and bolt the case directly to the rack.

    You mentioned lots of HD space. If you're planning something serious, like a 4+ drive RAID configuration, pay close attention to mountpoints and airflow. Many entry-model 4U cases only have 2 mount points for hard drives. You can pick up 3.5-5.25" adapter brackets that'll let you mount additional drives in the 5.25" external bays -- there's usually 3 external bays on an entry-level 4U case. If you pick up one of the inserts that fit into the 3 external bay area and allow you to mount 5 hard drives sidways, be very *very* cautious if you're using 7200 RPM drives. Those drives run hot normally, and there's almost no space between the drives in these inserts, hence little room for airflow. You'll want a dedicated cooling fan, preferably built into the rear of the insert, or you're going to run a real risk of the drives quickly overheating and dying. (Been there, fried that, bought new drives.)

    Oh yes, and something that drove me crazy for a while -- if you pick up a second-hand rack and the mou

    --
    A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  126. Industrial supply houses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try industrial distributors such as Advantec and such. They often sell hardware that really isn't targetted at data centers but may be useful in your case. There may be an advantage due to pricing structure.

    Thanks
    Dave

  127. Learning from the pros by bjoel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Racks are nice and professional looking, but if I was doing the same thing, I'd go for some shelves from IKEA and regular mini tower PCs. Se http://www.nsc.liu.se/systems/cluster-overview/ind ex.html for some professional opinions on these matters from a supercomputer organisation.

  128. My Setup by condurre · · Score: 3, Informative

    I now use a 6 foot Damac rack and 5 Anova 4U rackmount cases in my home.

    The Damac is just a four post rack. You don't have to get all the doors and sides that it can be ordered with. Wheels are a must to move it out from the wall to make cabling changes.

    The Anova rackmount computer cases have removable/washable filters. They are very easy to open and work with once unracked.

    Running multiple machines is pretty noisy, but you get used to it. It also keeps your home 10 degrees warmer all year long.

    You may also run into power problems in a house with substandard electrical power.

    SKB Cases can be used for a more portable racking solution.

  129. don't bring a UPS with you by rectrix · · Score: 3, Interesting
    unless you are certain that it will run dual voltage. I just moved from the US to Germany. I had no problems with the power supplies in my equipment (4 laptops, 6 PCs, 1 UltraSparc) HOWEVER - two very annoying bits that I had not considered:
    1. US purchased printer would not work on 220V without a power supply replacement (which can only be purchased from printer parts suppliers and swapping it out voids your warranty). Not an issue if you don't print I suppose.
    2. UPS. After many power outages in the US in several different East Coast locations (Boston, Washington D.C., and southern Virginia) I had come to rely on my UPS (from APS). After shipping the 50 pound battery across the Atlantic, only then did I realise that it was not compatible with 220V! Quite a surprise that you should not have to deal with (not the power outage which you should expect, but the lugging around of a 50 lb battery)

    By the way - don't forget to check the voltages on your networking equipment. Most of the modern network hubs, switches, etc. will be ok for 110-220V, but you'll need several adapter plugs or power cords (if you're lucky and the cord can be swapped). Or replace the power supplies with "universal adapters" - something like this is inexpensive ($14).

    Regarding extension cords and "power strips": I had brought my "high quality" power strips from the US - the ones with built in surge protectors - in hindsight it's no surprise that the "extra" 110 V is considered a surge.
    So now I have a pile of extension cords and power strips that are completely useless. :(

    One more tip: Before you go and purchase conversion plugs for your equipment, you may just want to purchase new power cords ($2.50) that are usually cheaper that the conversion plug ($15), plus it will be the proper size for US outlets. The UK plugs will usually make every-other outlet on a US power strip unusable due to the size difference.

    1. Re:don't bring a UPS with you by mcsmurf · · Score: 1

      Anyway power outages in Germany are veeery seldom (my APC at my server only had one in the whole year 2003).

  130. Rack case by richie2000 · · Score: 1

    If you, like me, can't afford the Chenbro, try the Compucase. It's cheap, takes a whole lot of drives (I have 8 in mine with easy room for 3 more). It has 12cm fans right in front of the drives so they keep really cool. Not much noise either, provided you use quiet drives (I have 7x160MB Seagate Barracudas and a 200GB on the way).

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  131. Router sized computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've got a similar problem to you, and, after years of noisy living rooms and bulky kit, I think I've found a solution.

    Not racks, nor wooden bookshelves. I rescued four racks once. Bloody useless things. Free racks still cost 'cos they need expensive cases. If you put ordinary PCs in on the shelves, you might as well use ordinary shelving, like some guys have mentioned here. Since then, I've always wanted small, small PCs, and I've finally found them. They're silent. They're the size of routers. They're cheap.

    But these PCs don't have any fancy extras, like video, keyboard or mouse (you use serial I/O, or SSH). They're only supported with free (as in four) operating systems, e.g. the BSDs and Linux. If you can work within those limitations, and I can, then you've gotta consider them. Since you didn't mention operating systems, I assume you want to keep your costs down, so you've gotta be going the not-unix route ... aren't you?

    I'm willing to bet there are a number of manufacturers about. I know of Soekris, from Santa Cruz, a town famous, so I've heard, for the silly decisions some people have made after long visits to its excellent beer festival. Soekris interest me because they specifically support Open BSD.

    1. Re:Router sized computers by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Just so I'm clear...

      You're recommending people invest in a 270 dollar 266 Mhz 586 without documentation or support, not guaranteed to run any operating system, no video or keyboard, requiring an external power supply?

      As part of a home development farm?

      I think these machines are intended to be used as embedded appliance controllers, although they don't seem very well suited to it, IMO.

  132. Don't go for computer racks by metalac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd suggest not buying any computer racks. They are pretty damn pricey, $400+ maybe less if you find them in used computer stores, and they are usually wayyyy too big, like 6 feet high and stuff. What I found works the best is recording equipment rackmounts they can be found from $80+. The one I have was $120 and it's rock solid. I already have 3 cases in it and a rackmount switch.

    1. Re:Don't go for computer racks by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      Ditto from me. I built a small rack for patch panels and servers from wood, and just used the rack rails (about $20) to mount things to. Music equipment supply places are much cheaper for racks, and they're all standard 19 inches. Storage shelves, blank panel fillers (that can be drilled or cut to to make your own patch panels as needed), etc. are much cheaper for musicians than IT, and basically the same thing. The only thing to watch out for are that audio racks are generally not the 3 foot depth of IT racks, but might work out depending on server depth.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
  133. Never underestimate the need for bragging rights. by lewko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am reminded of a geek friend who got really excited when he acquired a raised-floor system being thrown out of an ex-server room.

    He told me his wife had even agreed to let him install it in their bedroom.

    I said to him "why do you need a raised floor? I know how few cables you are running and you certainly don't have gas fire suppression or HVAC".

    He looked at me like an idiot and said "yeah, but dude... It's a RAISED FLOOR!"

    Sadly, I could totally see his point...

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  134. studio rack a place to start? by sweetaction · · Score: 2, Informative

    check this one. looks promising. http://www.electronicmusic.com/education/5326.html

  135. Re:bad for performance testing, bad for reliabilit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is not useless for performance testing: if your testing shows that performance is good enough on a vmware box, then your performance will be good enough.

  136. If you know where to look... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Racks aren't that expensive, if you know where to look. Racks are used in many industries, IT, and music. Check this out. Get a 6U burnished aluminium case for ~$80. Sure, cut a few holes in it for I/O, but it's cheap and easily transportable.

  137. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Another thing too, is you can fit some of the slimmer mini-tower cases standing up three across. This makes pretty good use of the space too, and it's easier to manage then stacking boxes on top of each other.

    Since he only wants three PC's to start, and maybe a few more, pretty much any combination would work. Even with mid-tower cases you should be able to fit at least six in a 42U cabinet.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  138. tons of ram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A ton, that is, 1000kg, is not cheaper than an entire machine.

  139. Easy access isn't just for pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't knock that "raised floor" too bad. Imagine how much easier it would be to work on a house's "infrastructure" (plumbing, electrical, heating/cooling, etc), if all you had to do was lift a floor panel?

    Disneyworld works on the "easy access" principle when it comes to it's infrastructure as well.

    1. Re:Easy access isn't just for pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't knock that "raised floor" too bad. Imagine how much easier it would be to work on a house's "infrastructure" (plumbing, electrical, heating/cooling, etc), if all you had to do was lift a floor panel?

      Disneyworld works on the "easy access" principle when it comes to it's infrastructure as well.

      I visited Orlando, FL recently and I hooked up with the chick in the Snow White costume. Don't let her act fool you -- it's "easy access" to her plumbing...
  140. Wooden cabinets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Goes something like this....

    Get a wooden cabinet like a bedside cabinet tall enough for MOBO to fit vertically and to have a draw at the top. Buy 1 spice rack or similar shelf to take PSUs. Buy a few cheap PC cases - to gut out PSUs. A long hinge. and a power strip.

    Route slots in some 2x1 timber (2 strips) or similar for the mobo to go vertical. Adjust spaces between mobos with same 2x1. Remove top draw front keeping draw sides/slide in cabinet. Refit front with the hinge.Cut holes in back for MOBO I/O ports.

    Cut holes in back of lower partof cabinet for PSU cables. Cut holes in bottom of the top draw for round IDE cables. Fed low volt PSU cables in from back. Feed round IDE cables from top drawer. Have MOBO boards vertical and slot into slots. Leave PSU loose on a spice rack or shelf on back of cabine above where you'll be cutting the I/O slots.

    Have HDD in Antec HDD coolers and plug into IDE cables. Leave loose on top draw.Plug mains cables into PSU and powerup.

    Ideally also have the KVM in top draw with monitor on top and a narrow keyboard.

  141. Your sig should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its head up its arse.

  142. SuperServer 6010H on eBay, going fast! by hacker · · Score: 1
    I'm selling my SuperServer 6010H on eBay... feel free to make me an offer.
    The award-winning SuperServer 6010H is Supermicros best-selling server product. Its robust and sleek ultra-thin 1U design is critically acclaimed within the industry. It provides build-as-you-grow scalability for Internet, ISP, and application computing needs.

    Featuring dual 1.0GHz with 256K cache Pentium III Flip/Chip processors (FCPGA) and up to 4GB of 133MHz ECC registered SDRAM memory (Note: no processors, drives, or memory is included in this auction), SuperServer 6010H promises satisfaction for companies of any size.

    Known for superior performance and product quality, Supermicro offers a comprehensive set of density-optimized solutions that are proven to solve any challenges that customers encounter when they deploy servers in a racked environment. This server is in mint-condition, unracked from a production facility and treated with the utmost care during its use and operation.

  143. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by stefanb · · Score: 5, Informative
    That being said, a KVM is awfully handy if you need control over a machine during the early boot stages -- you can't get to the BIOS settings display using X forwarding. :-)

    Get a mainboard that supports serial console redirection, like the Tyan Tomcat i875P, and hook the (first) serial port up to a multi-serial board in another box, or get the excellent (but expensive) Cyclades TS-Series console server.

    We just picked up four of them as firewalls (in 1U cases from Chenbro) as well a backup server, and the redirection works like a charm.

  144. Re:Syncronicity strikes again! AGAIN AGAIN AGAIN A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about timely

    Talk about timely.

    I just ate a sandwich at home this weekend.

    I just ate a sandwich at home this weekend.

    Millions of people around the globe were eating sandwhiches at home as well. Even factoring in the time zone differences, they were there, eating them in the morning, eating them in the dead of night, eating them in a house, eating them with a mouse.

    Millions of people around the globe were eating sandwhiches at home as well. Even factoring in the time zone differences, they were there, eating them in the morning, eating them in the dead of night, eating them in a house, eating them with a mouse.

    Syncronicity strikes again!

    Syncronicity strikes again!

    It's really a special time, because humans rarely do the same things at the same times.

    It's really a special time, because humans rarely do the same things at the same times.

    Now it's time to syncronously take a dump....

  145. Minit-Itx by Britz · · Score: 1

    I would also recommend VMWare, but apart from that if You really, really need seperate computers take a look at VIA's line of Mini-Itx boards.

    They don't perform very good, but You don't want to play UT 2004 in them anyways. They also don't perform very well for the buck, but they have everything onboard. On a small board that is. This way You could purchase them while in the UK and ship 'em over for not much money.

    The M and CL series use DDR-Ram whereas the V series still uses SD-Ram. So You should get M or CL. The CL is slightly more expensive, but You get 2 nic adapters onboard. The CL6000 is fanless, but only has a C3 processor, whereas the CL10000 sports an Eden ESP with full SSE2 support, but also has a noisy fan.

    Those are also cheaper than a Shuttle with a P4. And a lot quieter if You go CL6000.

  146. Mini-itx rackmounts by Halvard · · Score: 1

    You don't provide system characteristics orther than "lots of memory and hard drive space". So I'll assume that performance doesn't have to be earth shattering.

    Since you are talking about home, space, noise and electricity *should* be concerns since your employer won't compensate you for those, even if you are the employer. Two Travla 147 cases and your choice of 3 different mini-ITX backplanes can be married to 4 mini-itx motherboards. That means in 2 rack units, you can have 4 quiet systems that don't use huge amounts of electricity with up to 1GB of RAM and a single IDE hard drive in the chassis. Travla 146 has 4 internal 3.5" bays. You won't kill yourself with expenses or noise.

  147. Just answer the poor shmuck already! DESKTOP RAILS by Sanctum · · Score: 1

    Hiya, I also looked for a nice little system that I placed in my office closet. I run my mail, firewall, and raid 5 set off a desktop rail mount. theyre fairly cheap ($44). here is the site http://www.rackmountsolutions.net/DR8-12%20Enlarge d.asp I bought 1 4U case for my IDE raid 5 set and 2 2u for my firewall and VMWARE server pc. The empty cases were fairly cheap (about $150) but i wish i bought them all 4u because I'd have the room to mess around more. Good Luck. -G

  148. Try a spinserver by forsetti · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried one of these yet, but they look pretty darn cool!

    --
    10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
    1. Re:Try a spinserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got 6 of them at work ( 2U and 3U ) and I even have a 2U at home.

      The fact that the 2U and 3U models use standard sized ATX power supplies helps a lot, and that 3U cases can take full height PCI cards means you're not stuck with a limited range of parts.

      There is lots of space for drives inside, and plenty of ventilation.

      Oh, and space for a few fans on the back for you overclocker freaks :)

  149. did this exact thing for a mobile demo cluster. by peril · · Score: 1

    I bought a 10u and a 15u 24" deep AJ case

    http://ajcases.com/ajtext/products/di-shock-moun t/ index.htm

    , and placed 3x rave 2u cases with some ultrsSparcAXI hardware inside, couple of 1u switches, etc.

    http://www.rave.net/PRODUCTS/axi-2U5-specs.html

    The shockmount racks were expensive, (about $500 on ebay), but worth it so when I move out of the current house, I just decable the systems, and put the panels on for the movers. (It's nice to have the systems in a compact case setup as well, as oppposed to all spread out over creation.)

    My wife got sick of the 3 tables/desks worth of computer equipment hogging up the rec room space.

    Not so great picture, here: http://stick.tookmymoney.com/gallery/tanabday2003/ IMG_1551

    The lack of clutter is well worth the expense.

    (O yeah, btw, don't overbuy the rack space, I have 25u of rack space, and I'm only using 10u.)

    --Adrian

  150. Re:You missed one by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
    Hey - it is not bad idea! Remember the stories of cop raids that occassionally pop up on Slashdot or Kuro5hin, when the coppers haul away trucks of hardware, including peoples' dissertations and business records? A stealth data storage, located somewhere outside of the normal scope of attention could be a lifesaver in such situations.

    Various things like the WiFi data storage units could be helpful in this way; hide one between the walls, and "forget" about it. The raid team then either misses it, or somebody rats about it (which is not likely if you keep it for yourself), or they do a TSCM scan (which is quite unlikely), or they have to disassemble the building (which they are unlikely to do as it is not standard way to secure the evidence and it takes too much work).

  151. Bare minimum space? by CyberPsyko · · Score: 0

    Instead of going rack mounted, you might want to try this pc case out. Its dimensions are 8" x 7.4" x 11.7". I think this is a slick little case here!

  152. What closet are you hiding in? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    You have to be a real hermit to ask about rack mounting these days. Pick up any catalog and you will find hundreds of solutions. What a waste of web space to post this as a headliner questions. Bad slashdot editor, bad!

    1. Re:What closet are you hiding in? by andrewa · · Score: 1

      Duh. I think the point is that the poster was asking the opinion of fellow /.'ers. It's easy enough to go and look for equipment, but try getting an unbiased opinion from a vendor...

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
  153. Good place to look... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Call JS Custom PCs in Cincinnati. Excellent pricing. They'll build or supply parts only (same price either way). Check 'em out.

    They do sell lots of stuff not listed on the web site.

    http://www.jscustompcs.com/

  154. Re:You missed one by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    You can disassemble the power supply, bravely ignoring the warnings on its case, and check for yourself if the switch is connected to the board (and where), and check by an ohmmeter if it is really switched. Very basic knowledge of switched power supplies is helpful here. Also, a test of the PS on some dummy (or at least cheap) load after the visual and functionality check of the switch will be good to be certain.

  155. Remote support for Windows too... by NotClever · · Score: 1
    A good KVM switch is a handy thing to have - the switches themselves aren't too expensive anymore, but the cables can add up.

    However, if you do want to live without a KVM switch, Windows 2000 Server, Windows XP Pro and Windows Server 2003 support remote access right out of the box. Or, you can use VNC for access, but it is *much* slower.

    Just thought I'd throw this out. Let's see if it ignites a flamewar :)

    --
    Hell, there are no rules here. We're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas Edison
    1. Re:Remote support for Windows too... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 2, Insightful
      However, if you do want to live without a KVM switch, Windows 2000 Server, Windows XP Pro and Windows Server 2003 support remote access right out of the box. Or, you can use VNC for access, but it is *much* slower.

      Just thought I'd throw this out. Let's see if it ignites a flamewar :)

      Hopefully no flames break out. I only mentioned Linux and X forwarding as an example of an alternative to using a KVM in a multi-system, single-monitor environment. (I'm a Linux developer, so that's what I'm most familiar with.) Hopefully others will see both our posts for what they are -- general info that might be of use to people, not "my OS is bigger/better/badder than your OS" tripe. :-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    2. Re:Remote support for Windows too... by NotClever · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot... what are the odds of that happening? :)

      --
      Hell, there are no rules here. We're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas Edison
    3. Re:Remote support for Windows too... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
      This is Slashdot... what are the odds of that happening? :)

      Yeah, those pesky VNC-fanatics will probably be popping in any minute now, talking about how it's really quite fast compared to X forwarding or that Windows remote access thing you mentioned...and it all goes downhill from there.

      Oh, wait... You probably meant the whole Linux vs Windows rivalry, didn't you? ;-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    4. Re:Remote support for Windows too... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "I only mentioned Linux and X forwarding as an example of an alternative to using a KVM in a multi-system, single-monitor environment"

      WindowsXP seems to have some sort of support for remote desktops, just from looking at the "system" control panel. Presumably you get a client as well as a server as part of the operating system?

    5. Re:Remote support for Windows too... by (C)0N0(R) · · Score: 1

      I have clients (people-clients) that use this, seems that licenses need to be purchased for attitional clients.

      --
      The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.
    6. Re:Remote support for Windows too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have clients (people-clients) that use this [Windows remote desktops]"

      How does that work then? Can one WindowsXP-pro machine just take-over the desktop of another, or do you need to get a standalone application to view/use someone else's desktop?

  156. Switchable Powersupplies by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

    Honestly Its has been nearly 20 years since I saw a Powersupply that that wasn't switchable between the 2 standard AC voltages that was worth more than 9.95$... so Powersupplies can practically be tossed from your Requirement list...

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  157. mini-itx by tacocat · · Score: 1

    You might consider the via epia boards and mini-itx boards for your test system. They can easily be built up in 8"x8"x12" cases, use under 20W power, and have only one fan (optional).

    Not as space efficient as rack mounts, but much better on power and they're cheap. Very inexpensive.

    I use them for my various servers around the area.

  158. Re:You missed one by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    Normal VGA cables won't be too good. The horizontal and vertical sync signals are no big deal - TTL levels, digital logic, low-frequency. The problem is in the video; you may like to try three higher-quality 75-ohm coax cables (I believe the VGA outputs/inputs are matched to 75 ohm). If that won't be enough, you may try to use converters from asymmetrical to symmetrical signal and back and use CAT5 cable instead of coax (the solution described in an earlier answer, you can buy them commercially or make from parts - Maxim makes MAX435 and MAX436 chips specifically for this purpose, though I am not sure if they would cope with the bandwidth of 1600x1200 in some sane refresh rate).

  159. Linitx.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Up to 4 pcs in a *single* 1U rack for a sensible price. Yes, you read right. And they're a UK outfit which should help. Linitx.com

  160. Rackmounting? Do you have to? by sidetrack · · Score: 1

    Well, racks of PCs are heavy, and noisy, and it's going to cost you a packet to ship them to the states (make sure you take the HDs out first, and package them up properly).
    If you can get away with it, you should consider using something like these:
    http://linitx.com/index.php?cPath=14
    If not, then the only rack-mount machines that are worth purchasing IMHO are these:
    http://www.rackable.com
    I've deployed about 35 of these, and they do nearly everything right - price, performance, remote management, footprint, service. I've used Dell, HP, IBM, Gigabyte and others, but only Rackable seem to really know what they are doing at a decent price. Highly recomended.

  161. Wood! by Mateito · · Score: 1

    Don't under estimate the power of wood!

    Yeah.. shiny metal racks are nice and all, but once I filled mine up I didnt feel like sacrificing the space for another one.

    So my dad and I sat down with a six pack and built a 20-odd unit rack out of scrap timber. Essentially its nothing more than a box with reinfornced cornes (for stability), and a couple of wooden strips down the front. Thus you can mount your gear using self-tapping wood screws.

    I also managed to pick up (dumpster diving) some angle bracket with threaded holes at the Rack Unit spacing... obviously something taken out of a once working rack. This we turned into rack using 3/4 inch square-X-section steel tubing. (Angle grinders rock. Use safety googles.)

    Total cost. I reckon less than US$50.. and half of that was for beer.

    1. Re:Wood! by kermit6306 · · Score: 1

      I did something similar. But what I did could more accurately be described as 'shelves', not racks. I spent about $20. It ain't pretty to look at but at least I have room for more computers. Picture

  162. go with towers by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

    If you need a cluster, grab a few mATX boards with all the trimmings, add as much RAM as you can cram on em and you're set.
    get some wood/aluminum/steel and a dremel and make your own case, or just grab some cheap matx boxes (matx'ers are a pain in the ass to work on.)

    I bought a 48" 12U rack (4 poster, used), 2U case (new) and 4U case (with fully loaded PII 350) for ~$250 on E-bay.
    My intention now is to use the rack for audio gear (i have a rackmountable preamp and the rest of the gear is 19" standard (needs rails or shelves) 2U (Amp and VTR) or 3 (Stereo reciever unit).

    I have three systems now that are classifiable as 'Server'
    I plan on a few conversions once i get more money.

    --
    Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
  163. A little late but hopefully helpful by tazanator · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have done this, and enjoy it. I bought a rack mount router from Imagestream and from there started down the road. I found 20U (36") racks at woodwind and brasswind music store (wwbw.com) for $99 and bought cases from Ebay for $75 each, some had backplanes (used) others didn't but had adapters for ATX motherboards. I spent the extra money (~$200) for quad segragated backplanes and can run 4 Computers in a 4U case with drives and all. I went quad cause most SBC'es now have everything you need on them, (my AA server need a sound card but every other device needed was on it) for gaming just dig up a PCI video card that has some good spec's. I now have 2 30U's and am looking for a few more to continue with (1 rack does dual duty as both my HAM radio rack, and holds a computer for the new software control programs) the 4U cases use standard power supplies (ATX) hold standard drives (5 1/4 and 3.5" bays) and most have an adapter allowing a standard motherboard or the backplane/SBC combo that is common in industrial setups (I have both types in my network) My gaming machine is a 4U with a standard biostar motherboard in fact the only thing different about it is the case being rack mounted and having 5 fans. so go for it!

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  164. 2U cases are tall enough for 80 mm fans. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    I had to upgrade a server from three 9 GB SCSI drives to whatever the boss could afford (which turned out to be a 160 GB IDE and a DVD±RW), and this case had five 80 MM fans inside, one of them inside a standard ATX power supply, which fit neatly into the case. Everything but the PCI card riser is stock off the shelf parts. When I reduced the clutter (rounded cables, two fewer drives), I was able to remove the two fans behind the drive cage and significantly reduce the noise of the machine without any sort of heat problem. That office has wonky air conditioning, but even on bad days it won't get above 85 degrees or so.

    The machine itself is kinda sad by today's standards, just a dual P3-500 and 512 MB of RAM, and there's no particular reason for it to be in a 2U server case at all, except that the mini-fridge sits on top of it quite neatly. The only compromises forced by the case are:

    1. Oddly placed power supply. In this one it's near the front, on the right side, and therefore blows its warm air directly across the motherboard. This also creates some rather odd cable clutter problems, but nothing too terrible.

    2. PCI card riser required. The board has six PCI slots and in this case you can only use two, and those two have to be "bent" 90 degrees to accommodate the low profile case. If you're using low-rise PCI cards and can find an inventive way to secure them, you may be able to do without the riser, but the case probably isn't designed that way. I believe this server case came with the PCI riser, it certainly looks like it would have to be.

    3. Limited choice in video cards. Basically you HAVE to go low-profile here, since there is no way to squeeze both an AGP and PCI riser into the same case (unless the AGP riser goes the other direction, again something the case is not designed for). But there are low-end DirectX 9 compliant parts that do meet this size requirement. Again you're going to have to be inventive with the mounting.

    4. A single 5.25" optical drive bay, and generally a single 3.5" floppy bay (though you may well use it another way). This is hardly insurmountable, since you can put various different types of drives in each of the stacked computers.

    Also note that rackmount cases are generally THICK, and that means HEAVY. Don't expect getting a full-size rack full of computers up and down a flight of stairs to be easy. It may well end up weighing more than a fridge, and those are bad enough to move around. Of course the rack would be somewhat more maneuverable, but that doesn't reduce the sheer grunt work needed to get the damn thing up the stairs. Once you get it up there, you may well move it around the house with ease (they usually have casters), but you won't be taking it LANning any time soon.

    All of the above are valid worries. Worrying about small, noisy fans isn't really one of them though. There are LOTS of 80 mm fan choices (some would say too many), and lots of places to mount them in the case.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:2U cases are tall enough for 80 mm fans. by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1

      I had to upgrade a server from three 9 GB SCSI drives to whatever the boss could afford (which turned out to be a 160 GB IDE and a DVD±RW), and this case had five 80 MM fans inside, one of them inside a standard ATX power supply, which fit neatly into the case.

      I stand corrected -- apologies! Yep, a 2U is tall enough for 80mm fans. How 'bout I ammend my comments to say "if you buy 2U, check the the fan mountpoint sizes in the specs to make sure upgrades/replacements are easy to obtain" -- advice I could've used myself a few years back when I first started experimenting with rackmounts, since the 2Us I ended up getting used smaller/noisier fans inside. :-)

      1. Oddly placed power supply. In this one it's near the front, on the right side, and therefore blows its warm air directly across the motherboard. This also creates some rather odd cable clutter problems, but nothing too terrible.

      Related anecdote: the 2U cases I was working with had the PS mounted in the middle of the right-hand side, with the PS's fan blowing across a group of brackets intended for mounting internal hard drives. Nothing like hot power supply exhaust blowing onto your already-hot drives. A secondary problem I encountered with this particular case configuration was that the cables for the hard drives were cramped enough that one of the hard drive power lines eventually managed to slip through the PS's fan guard and blocked the PS fan from turning. (If the fan had been more powerful, I suppose the alternative problem would have been the fan chewing apart the wires.)

      So tip from experience -- if any cable passes near a fan with enough play that it could reach the fan, some day it will joyfully leap into the spinning blades of doom. :-) Lesson I learned from that -- use tie wraps to secure cables to safe locations if they run past or near fans.

      3. Limited choice in video cards. Basically you HAVE to go low-profile here, since there is no way to squeeze both an AGP and PCI riser into the same case (unless the AGP riser goes the other direction, again something the case is not designed for).

      Never used any of these myself, but there's some AGP+PCI combo risers here -- Scroll down to the RC2-013/-014/-017 -- looks like they're using a double-stacked riser backplane plugged into the AGP slot with ribbon cables for the PCI slots. Just a random tidbit I found one day when I was looking for some other piece of rack gear. Maybe it'll come in handy for someone.

      I believe this server case came with the PCI riser, it certainly looks like it would have to be.

      FWIW, The 1U and 2U cases I'd bought (new) all included (PCI-only) riser cards. It'd be a good thing to ask about if purchasing a second-hand 1U/2U case though. I've seen these risers sold separately on several web sites that stock rack-oriented computer gear, so folks aren't SOL if they pick up a low-profile case and find the riser is missing. (The site I linked to for the PCI+AGP combo risers also sells more traditional 1U/2U PCI risers. The designs look the same as the risers in my cases.)

      Your video card comments reminded me of another factor for people considering 1U/2U cases. Since the number of cards you can install is limited, you might be tempted to omit the video card entirely. (I know I was.) Just make sure your machine's BIOS will still boot if it doesn't detect a video card -- as I discovered, several of my motherboards would refuse to boot without a video card. (In the BIOS settings, there's usually options for setting which POST errors to halt on, with options like "All", "All except keyboard", etc -- if you're planning to run without video, make sure there's an option like "All except kbd+vid

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  165. Here's what I've seen done... by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Build your own rails, pick up a drill/tap set at Home Depot (or wherever) for about $5... then just drill/tap the holes as you need them. Plastic garbage bag taped around the rail and a good vacuum cleaner to pick up the filings, and you don't even have to unmount all your hardware to do it. The rails themselves can be basic steel bar stock, or if cost/weight is a concern, use thick aluminum.

    Then you can either buy premade rackmounts or build your own. I'm an audio guy, and audio rackmount equipment is usually 10" between rails, as opposed to 19" for computer equipment. Though some of the high-end stuff is 19" between rails.

    Everyone I've seen that builds their own uses perspex or aluminum. Personally, were I to do this, I would get mini-ITX boards, with the Morex DC-DC power supplies. Run the whole rack on a big DC rectifier, and just patch in the 12V to each power supply. The units themselves are just six pieces of perspex; the top is on a hinge, the front (and possibly the back) is wider than the rest, to provide places to screw into the rails. Depending on your needs, you can PXE-boot them, and then you just need one computer for the whole thing with a big hard drive / RAID to hold the images on. Or you can just put a read-only operating system on a compact flash and put that in the mini-ITX. One version of the board even has the CF slot on it, so you don't need a converter to IDE.

    You can get most of the hardware from mini-itx.com, though I've had better luck with idot.com in terms of pricing. The 12V rectifier can be gotten from industrial surplus, or if you're handy with a soldering iron, you can build your own from a heavy duty transformer and a few power rectifier diodes. As far as software, any Linux Live CD (ala Knoppix) can PXE boot or boot off CF. If you want Windows, search for Windows PE on google, and it'll come up with a list of companies that make read-only Windows distros. If none of those meet your needs, BartPE makes a utility to roll your own... just install it on a hard drive, configure it, then run the utility.

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  166. LittlePCs in a Full tower by wlp · · Score: 0

    Good friend of mine (Also British) is looking to save the same problem. He's looking at http://www.littlepc.com . His only issue is embedding a switch and KVM into the same box. They should consider offering something like that prefabbed so he doesn't have to fab his own.

    Jonathan

    --
    This is my world and I am...
  167. Not expensive if you know where to look by lxt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not expensive if you know where to look - companies such as StudioSpares (in the UK) sell pro audio equipment racks dead cheap. The companies that you might first go to (in the UK, Canford, Stage Electrics etc) are very expensive, but it's still very much a misconception to say all pro audio equipment costs a lot.

    For example, I picked up a pro audio rack mounted Tascam CD player for theatre use for around 100 - cheaper than domestic players with the same features, and this model came with an industrial warrenty (as opposed to the domestic models, which come with a "home only" warrenty). The same applies to audio PCs - companies like Carillion sell rack mounted PCs without pro audio software for about the same as a brand name PC. Still more expensive than building your own, but not the 500% markup you describe.

  168. Re:bad for performance testing, bad for reliabilit by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 1

    He doesn't mention the need for performance testing... or the need for high-availabilty.

    Your arguments are spurious given the problem space provided.

  169. colomachine.com by BassettHound · · Score: 1

    I got a few of these colomachine.com machines, they work great, not a lot of horsepower, but for development they do the job.

  170. Build your own racks by Java+Ape · · Score: 1
    A few years ago I was lusting after rack-mount servers for much the same reason. I found several excellent deals on ebay in the aftermath of the dot-bombs, but didn't want the "early industrial" look of the rack-mount cabinet.

    So, I built a nice oak cabinet. It looks much like a tall hutch. The hutch doors look like standard flat-panel doors, but the center panel is acually a large air-filter (black foam pressed between wood lattice on the front and a screen in back). The back is mostly open for ventillation.

    The final cabinet ended up costing about $250 in materials, and looks lovely in my office. My only complaint is that, when the machines are on, it's not as quiet as I would like -- too many tiny fans spinning at high rpm. I'm not sure how to do sound deadening that won't interfere with the ventillation.

  171. Mini-ITX cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You could do something like this.

    Or just use mini-itx pc's, they're much more silent, and use less power...

  172. Cheap, Rack-Mounted Systems by ahamos · · Score: 1

    www.supermicro.com

    I bought a 1U/P4/256MB/40GB for $650 a year ago. It works perfectly, was cheap, and looks great in my rack.

    IT'S NOISY AS HELL, THOUGH.

  173. Re:Stay in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hell.. stay where you are... even if you ARE a US citizen.... take THEIR jobs...

  174. Moving UK to US shipping advice by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    Don't use UPS! I shipped a few computers from the UK to US when I moved to California. They arrived in a right state - basically one of the very heavy-duty steel cases was buckled - actually looked like it had been jumped on (footprint!) A SCSI HD was trashed (magnetic problems, or jolts?) a CD-ROM was smashed, a plastic case was smashed.... An try getting money out of them (my stupid office admin didn't get insurance!) I actually brough a computer and laptop with me on the plane after that! But back to the rack issue - have you thought of a Shuttle Mini-ATX - they have 200W PSU's that are auto-switching. Also, any decent PSU should be 115/220 switchable.

    --
    #include <sig.h>
  175. Alternative to extra hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this it seems to be a slimmer version of vmware for $120. The number of virtual machines you run is limited by the amount of ram you have, but you can assign the amount of ram each one gets. Anyway, it is possible to run all kinds of OSes under each virtual pc. There is a free 45 day trial in case you don't think it will work for you.

  176. Stereotypes indeed... by temojen · · Score: 1

    I keep reading this assertion that geeks have terrible personal hygene here on slashdot. Usually it's in a troll post. Of the hundred or so geeks in the upper level computer science progrm at my university I know of one who could be described as having a hygene problem.

    Observations do not back up the assertion that geeks have poor hygene.

  177. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
    Get a mainboard that supports serial console redirection, like the Tyan Tomcat i875P

    Oh, now that is nice! (Especially given the price difference between serial cables and KVM cables. :-) Thanks for pointing that out. Convenient timing, too -- I just started looking at components for putting together another computer.

    --
    A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  178. Re:You missed one by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

    You could, or you could spend $10 more in the first place and save yourself an hour or more of disassembling your PC to get the supply out, disassembling the supply itself and the horror of seeing just how badly those things are built, then the time-wasting exercise with the ohmmeter. I don't know about you, but my time is worth $10/hr. Even to those who pay my salary!
    Go really deluxe, spend $20 extra and you'll get a supply that handles 100-240V, 50-60Hz, without switching! Now there's value.

  179. Re:You missed one by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    I usually have to solve problems when the shops are either closed or far away (and when you add the time lost by going to the shop and back, the cost equations often start looking somehow different). Besides, this is not a hour or more, but maybe 5 minutes or less, at least if you can recognize the right end of the screwdriver.

  180. xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a cluster of xboxes running *nix would be a cost affective alternative to rack mounting as well.

  181. If you're cheap you can even skip the rack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An old office of mine had 3 1-U servers sitting on top of each other. Some rack-mount stuff stacks nicely without the racks. Don't know how hot they were inside, but they sure had loud fans.

  182. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

    "Go with 4U rack mount cases. They are cheap, and easy. They will fit all your standard hardware out there."

    Go with desktop PCs -- you can get shelves for the rack.

    We've just installed about 15 PCs (standard dell desktops) in racks at work, and it's certainly more convenient than having to unbolt stuff every time you want to get a computer out (for changing graphics/soundcards etc.)

  183. Re:Been there, done that, painted it metallic gree by linusthefish · · Score: 1

    First of all, my rack is Mountain Dew green, which is awesome. I got this cool rack off eBay (which later got painted ;-), and actually just built the components straight into the rack. Yeah, it does sound crazy, but not only does it keep my components healthy, it makes hot-swapping things a joy. As long as you can design a good support structure like I did, it'll work. Good luck.

  184. Re:You missed one by Hardwyred · · Score: 1

    Im working on finishing my basement right now and their are no shortage of little places to fit a couple of gigs of data. But here is my thought. I bet you could fit a gumstix into a standard outlet box. Get the bluetooth version and an SD card, then just put a dummy ethernet jack or phone line into the box and viola. Easy to get to should you need the access and the last place I would ever look for a machine.

    BTW, love the name, that was a great book.

    --
    www.linux-skunkworks.com
  185. Check out by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
    SuperMicro... they have excellent 1U and 2U case and motherboard combos that are inexpensive.

    And no, I don't work for them. Just a happy customer.

  186. A real space saver by supergeekmake-it-so. · · Score: 1

    I was pretty tied up for space to build my sandbox, so I opted for 4u rack systems to alleviate cost in the beginning. After I got started with that I found Cubix systems on eBay relatively inexpensive. I now have 2 1210 systems and 6 ERS FT II systems. They are 6u cases with 8 single board computers. They save me space, are redundant, have a built in KVM system, and are realtively easy to manage. I now house over 48 machines in a single 42u rack, and still have room to spare. Now I've expanded to another rack to house my SCSI and Fibre Channel storage systems. It's been a great experience using Cubix systems. All of the rest of my systems are either Compaq, Dell, or beige boxes.

  187. go all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B L A D E S.

  188. Use itx cases by gam3 · · Score: 1

    I would buy several itx style computers like this one http://www.directron.com/ideq200ab.html, and stack them up in some unused corner of a closet.
    (Make sure it does not get to hot.)

    Then you can control them with a kvm like
    http://www.kvm-switches-online.com/f1ds104t. html
    to connect all the computers together.

    It seems to me that you might find that the noise
    and heat put out by a large number of computers is more than you expect.

  189. Racking and Stacking by FutureExpressionist · · Score: 1

    Michael, I read through the other recommendations -- not sure if 19" is a requirement but wire bread racks can be had at Lowe's or Home Depot for about 65 dollars and can be put on wheels for access to the rear. You can rack and stack machines as densely as you like.
    Real 19" form-factored equipment will cost you a bundle, The Blade Servers idea is very compact if you're buying new equipment all around.
    If you are on "no budget" you can scrounge old PCs and rev them up at less cost; That's the route I'm on at the moment. Old gear can do a lot if you remove the gorilla resource hog from its back (MS Products). Obviously old is not as fast as new gear and you have to deal with obsolescene problems.
    Mytwocents worth, FutureExpressionist

  190. Been there by Visigoth21 · · Score: 1

    I am a developer also and had a similar need but I went a different direction. In that I was going to have to simulate traffic I decided to short change the hardware on purpose so that the resources available were easier to saturate. The code thus written is more efficient when ramped up to stronger machines. I used micro-itx based systems which are in some cases smaller than the reference books on my shelf they are fleshed out by used laptop parts and have external (read replaceable) power bricks. A possibly even better system for development are the old hp-epcs that can be found on ebay as they have quickly swappable hard drives so a developer could quickly recreate any setup and then keep it separate for the cost of an inexpensive 3.5 inch hard drive.

  191. inexpensive rack by timemerick · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at inexpensive rack equipment as well. Here's a company you might find useful. http://www.rackframe.com

    I do not work for this company. Just passing along info.

  192. Rack Mount by vikramjairam · · Score: 1

    Go to Tigerdirect.com CyberTron and Vision Manufacture Rack Mount servers starting at $490. I have two Visions (pretty old though.. PIII), one for a SQL server and another for a web server. Does a great job. Use the servers link on http://www.eafx.com/ and do me a favor!

  193. Re:You missed one by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

    You time yourself sometime - start with a running PC, end with a running PC. It's easily an hour.

  194. Re:You missed one by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    Seems your machines tend to shutdown/boot extremely slowly. In addition, for a basic check you don't need to disconnect all the cables, they may be still connected when you mess with the PS's internals (and even if not, that shouldn't take more than additional 5 minutes, unless you are somehow butterfingered. You can assemble an entire machine from scratch in under 15 minutes, practically tested couple years ago in order to win a bet - you need some practice though.

  195. mini box by Alkemist · · Score: 1

    check out www.mini-box.com

    from the cheap n chearful brigage