Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Patents The Body Bus

Mz6 writes "Microsoft has been awarded a patent for using human skin as a power conduit and data bus. Patent No. 6,754,472, which was published Tuesday, describes a method for transmitting power and data to devices worn on the body and for communication of data between those devices. In its filing, Microsoft cites the proliferation of wearable electronic devices, such as wristwatches, pagers, PDAs (worn on people's belts) and small displays that can now be mounted on headgear. "As a result of carrying multiple portable electronic devices, there is often a significant amount of redundancy in terms of input/output devices included in the portable devices used by a single person," says the filing. "For example, a watch, pager, PDA and radio may all include a speaker." To reduce the redundancy of input/output devices, Microsoft's patent proposes a personal area network that allows a single data input or output device to be used by multiple portable devices." (What about DoCoMo's research in this area?)

508 comments

  1. And in other news.... by ShepyNCL · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..... Micrsoft to sue all future survivors of lightning strikes.

    1. Re:And in other news.... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      and anyone using an electric chair

    2. Re:And in other news.... by 2names · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Microsoft sues every living thing that has a nervous system. They are all electrical, right? They all pass data, right? They have input/output devices, right?

      We are really screwed now.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    3. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are all electrical, right?

      No.

      They all pass data, right?

      No.

      They have input/output devices, right?

      No.

      Thank you for your efforts, though. We will put you on the waiting list.

    4. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      They are all electrical, right?
      No.

      They all pass data, right?
      No.

      They have input/output devices, right?
      No.


      Resistance is futile.

      You will all be assimilated!!!

    5. Re:And in other news.... by baxissimo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Resistance isn't futile. It's V/I.

    6. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is that M$ better keep its crappy software off my body, and not interfere with any Linux signals...:-)

    7. Re:And in other news.... by jadenyk · · Score: 5, Funny
      Microsoft redefines so much technology here... Think about it...
      • Security Hole
      • Emptying the recycle bin
      • Packet Sniffer

      Man, I could go on forever..

    8. Re:And in other news.... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meanwhile, Ray Bradbury is demanding an apology from Microsoft for lifting the title from his classic work I Sing the Body Electric.

    9. Re:And in other news.... by iantri · · Score: 1
      They won't be alive long enough to sue...

      Oh.. wait..

    10. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's V/I

      This isn't one of those emacs vs. some other editor jokes, is it?

    11. Re:And in other news.... by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      The parent has a good point, I don't know why he was marked as offtopic. Neural impulses do have an electric charged and are regularly measured using voltage through electrodes in modern science.

    12. Re:And in other news.... by DJStealth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry for the additional post, but I just realized, that many of those machines to calculate body fat transmit electrical signals through the body in order to obtain data on body fat, water, etc..

    13. Re:And in other news.... by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      No, it's a physics principle. Resistance (R) in ohms = Voltage (V) (volts) / Current (I) (Amps)

    14. Re:And in other news.... by twofidyKidd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's leave "floppy drive" out of this one.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    15. Re:And in other news.... by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost.

      It would be R=E/I

      where

      (R)esistance is expressed in Ohms
      (E)lectrical Potential is expressed in Volts
      (I)Current is expressed in Amperes

      Don't apply the units until you actually make the calculation.

      At least, that's what they taught me in my military electronics training, way back when.

    16. Re:And in other news.... by mallardtheduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, in my physics class we always use V. E is too abigous. It could easily mean (E)lectircal current or (E)lectrical resistance or (E)nergy...

    17. Re:And in other news.... by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course Ray Bradbury got that title from Walt Whitman. (Funny that he is demanding that Moore change the title of his movie, considering...)

    18. Re:And in other news.... by jdray · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I didn't RTFA. Does the patent specify digital data? AFAIK, the nervous system is analog, as are all those fat-testing scales and things.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    19. Re:And in other news.... by jdray · · Score: 1

      Although, depending on the system in question, "flash drive" could be okay...

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    20. Re:And in other news.... by pediddle · · Score: 1

      In my physics class, E means the electric field vector.

    21. Re:And in other news.... by DJStealth · · Score: 0

      The nervous system is not necessarily analog. Although, to my knowledge, most cells are constantly giving responses, they are effectively frequency modulated on-off responses, where higher frequency implies on, and lower frequency implies off; many would call that digital.

    22. Re:And in other news.... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Then your physics class is wrong. Voltage is a unit, not a property. The property is (E)lectromotive Force.

    23. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap! Core Dump! Need to reboot!

    24. Re:And in other news.... by bicho · · Score: 1

      thats funny, because I have always used V, and I have always though it stands for Voltage, which is not a unit, like Volt.

      --

      errera hunamum ets
    25. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously their plan is something like this...

      1. Patent something required for life
      2. Look around for living people
      3. ???
      4. PROFIT!!!

    26. Re:And in other news.... by ShepyNCL · · Score: 0

      As an aside, Its my girlfriends birthday. God bless you Slashdot, i'll always remember her birthday now, as it was the same day i got a first post on slashdot. Now, if i can just aim to get an article posted on our anniversary, im all sorted.

    27. Re:And in other news.... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 0

      Ha! Burnt, and burnt well. Anyone like their ignorance nice and crispy?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    28. Re:And in other news.... by xQx · · Score: 1

      When you're finished trying to tell the general public that, I dare you to try to explain that acceleration is a vector mesurement and can't be worked out by "difference in speed"

    29. Re:And in other news.... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Nikola Tesla experimented with power transmission in many different forms. One of them (probably done more for show than anything else) was to transmit power across human skin, at frequencies high enough so that it would not penetrate the surface to cause burning.

      If they do anything of the sort in their patent, we've got 100-year old prior art.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    30. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh no Microsoft is going to sue me cause I have a pacemaker without an embedded MS operating system.

    31. Re:And in other news.... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Actually, what Ray Bradbury has recently done is denounce M. Moore for misappropriating the title of his great novel, Fahrenheit 451.

      --
      resigned
    32. Re:And in other news.... by vampyre78 · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that if i disagree with the EULA then i'm pirating my body?

    33. Re:And in other news.... by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      It would be R=E/I

      where

      (R)esistance is expressed in Ohms
      (E)lectrical Potential is expressed in Volts
      (I)Current is expressed in Amperes

      Don't apply the units until you actually make the calculation.

      At least, that's what they taught me in my military electronics training, way back when.

      E is used for the electric field vector.

      One uses V both for Voltage, the electric potential, and Volts, the unit of electric potential. Thus you end up with expressions like "V = 12 V", where the first V is a variable and the second V is the units.

      You learn not to confuse the two fairly quickly. Typically the variable is designated with a lowercase v and usually has a handful of subscripts hanging off it.

      At least that's what they taught me in my electrical engineering classes not so long ago.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    34. Re:And in other news.... by MWelchUK · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that many people will have learnt it as V=IR. Like pretty much the entirety of the UK.

      Voltage is not a unit, a Volt is.

    35. Re:And in other news.... by hbyte · · Score: 1

      AFAIK in the SI (Systeme Internationale, the units and stuff standard that is - at least - used in Europe), the symbol for voltage is U. But, hey, what do I know, I only study electronics here in Europe. (Note that I learnt here hat the symbol indeed has been E but has been revised to U sometime ago.)

    36. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Right - Bradbury is on nano-thin moral ground given his borrowings (Golden Apples, I Sing The Body, Something Wicked).

      And he's on nonexistent legal ground: The following are examples of works not subject to copyright... Words and short phrases such as names, titles, and slogans

    37. Re:And in other news.... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the "Update your 3"1/2 to 8" unit" spam.

      (youngsters may or may not get this).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    38. Re:And in other news.... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      "Clear!" (presses paddles to chest) "Reboot!"

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    39. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The milage is not a unit, a mile is.

  2. I'll try extra hard not to get electrocuted now... by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm an EE, and I don't want my wife to inherit a lawsuit for patent infringement. ;)

  3. This might be valid by Woodrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a physical device and if there is no prior art then I think this is a very valid patent.

    1. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasn't Tesla doing this a century ago?

    2. Re:This might be valid by Woodrow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So Telsa had a portable computers and wanted to link them all? As a device this might be unique. Now there may be prior art on this subject so then it would not be unique.

    3. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is a physical device and if there is no prior art then I think this is a
      > very valid patent.

      Like all patents, you mean? I'd be suprised if there was no prior art close enough to the patent to make it worthless. Some lie detectors work this way. What about those kooky Scientology E-Meters - aren't they similar too?

    4. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the lady at the circus who hold a lightbulb in one hand and put her other hand on a large powersource enough prior art for you?

      Seriously, people have been using human skin/body parts for simple tricks like that for a long, long time...Nikola Tesla, cough, cough.

    5. Re:This might be valid by aka-ed · · Score: 5, Informative
      Doesn't matter. Patent #6754472, which you could easily access from the USPO website, is a patent for "method and apparatus," and spells out exactly what the apparatus is supposed to accomplish. It doesn't prevent others from using human conductivity for other unrelated purposes, and in fact cites 8 previous patents, including some exploiting the same principle. You seem to be lacking a sense of what it is that patents actually protect.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    6. Re:This might be valid by mikael · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They measure resistance conducted through the human body. Any standard electronic voltmeter can be programmed to measure resistance in the low ohm range.

      With the Atari series of computers, it was possible to use human body as a game controller. By holding onto a pair of connectors connected to the paddle input pins, it was possible to change the resistance of the circuit by changing how strongly you gripped the connectors.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:This might be valid by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No prior art? You might want to read the spec for ieee488 bus.

      Is it not a requirement for US patents to be non-obvious as well?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    8. Re:This might be valid by TechniMyoko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thats not transmission of data though by your logic USB wouldnt be able to be patented since power cables exist. Afterall, all data is is electricity

    9. Re:This might be valid by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's about data transfer, not conductivity.

      If she was using her body as a part of a data network, perhaps it would invalvidate the patent.

    10. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, but he did demonstrate using the body to conduct electricity, i.e. supplying power to a device.

    11. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wear do current technologies like Heart Rate Monitors fit into this?

      Polar, Nike, even Timex have what I'd call body based data bus technology already. Interesting patent to say the least, I wonder what is next. Beside a proliferation of IP lawyers.

    12. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean we can charge them for the usage of our wire? Doesn't the 96 telcom act say that we would sell such use at a cost+ amount? What is the lifetime value of maintenance of your selfwire?

    13. Re:This might be valid by tchuladdiass · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about the times I used to hold a coat hanger in one hand, and grab the TV antenna with the other, in order to get a good signal? My body was used to carry data then (although it was analog).

    14. Re:This might be valid by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      The scene where the electrician grabs 2 wires to make a connection on the sub in Up Periscope comes to mind...hehe.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    15. Re:This might be valid by velo_mike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wear do current technologies like Heart Rate Monitors fit into this? Polar, Nike, even Timex have what I'd call body based data bus technology already

      Don't HRM's transmit the data via radio frequency? They recieve electrical impulses through the skin, but don't use the body as a conductor to transmit the data.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    16. Re:This might be valid by squozebrain · · Score: 1

      Transcutaneous communication is not a new idea. It has been around perhaps for decades as part of systems to communicate with implanted devices, such as pacemakers. There are dozens of academic papers on the subject, dating back possibly to the 70's. Microsoft's patent is (I hope) probably some narrow implementation strategy, protocol, or specific device specification. The idea itself (of communication across the skin) is not new or patentable.

    17. Re:This might be valid by mAineAc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know, I found this that talks about PAN(personal area netowrk) from 1995

    18. Re:This might be valid by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is a good point, but the question then arises of whether the information is transmitted from the heart to the monitor, or whether the information is simply being transmitted from the skin to the monitor. And is the pulsing of the heart comparable to much more complex data?

      I wonder what kind of interference there will be between this and pacemakers or cochlear implants. (Or are cochlear implants oblivious to the body's electrical currents?)

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    19. Re:This might be valid by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > Is it not a requirement for US patents to be non-obvious as well?

      Besides, you don't patent the very idea of a "body bus", but your particular way of implementing it.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    20. Re:This might be valid by samantha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh huh. This is the human body or more specifically, its skin. It has been known to be able to carry signals and even some amount of power for some time. Exactly what physical device did M$ invent here? It can legitimately patent devices to take advantage of this capability. But it cannot patent the very idea of using the skin in this manner any more than someone could at one time have patented running power through a conductor.

    21. Re:This might be valid by Psion · · Score: 1

      Hold on a second. Wasn't MIT's media lab doing this a decade ago? I thought I remember something about Negropronte exchanging information between computers with a simple handshake.

    22. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that this already exists.

      Hearing aids that have the electro-magnetic who's a thingy. You touch something, and the electro-magnetic field is dispersed over your skin, if you have one of these hearing aids, and a source, you can listen to whatever via your skin.

      If the EM field is stronger, it can go considerable distances (ie movie theatres, court rooms).

    23. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      prior art? http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan.html

    24. Re:This might be valid by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Too bad there's been people doing research and creating devices using this principle for at least 15 years. Hell, I assisted my friend's senior project in creating a Bluetooth implementation of a sensor net that communicated through Bluetooth over the skin. We even did propagation studies by wiring ourselves to a network analyzer and running on a treadmill.

      Patently stupid, if you ask me.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    25. Re:This might be valid by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      They measure resistance conducted through the human body. Any standard electronic voltmeter can be programmed to measure resistance in the low ohm range.


      OK. What about those scales that measure % body fat. Isn't that just a measure of resistance through the body and inferring some stuff?

      Obviously it's not really a bus per se, but it does use resistance in the body to relay data does it not?

      Heck, even that little doo-hickey that Chiropractors use to measure your spine sounds like this.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    26. Re:This might be valid by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend never would have thought of that.

    27. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior art? EKG. EMG. Polar heartrate monitors (and most heartrate monitors since).

    28. Re:This might be valid by IsaacW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A number of posts in this story have made the comparison between this patent and devices like heart rate monitors and body fat meters. The authors of those posts have missed the fact that the devices they are citing are sensors. They are not "sending data using skin as the phyiscal media," rather they are sensing some physical phenomenon (heart rate or body fat percentage) using some electronic device. These devices are not "prior art" to this patent, nor could this patent be used to challenge the manufacturing of these devices.

    29. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Amiga was far superior! It had a number of devices that allowed a human body to control it. I think the first was called the keyboard. Basically this worked by the human pressing his fingers against an array of buttons.

    30. Re:This might be valid by Sebby · · Score: 1
      "lacking a sense of what it is that patents actually protect"

      It's rather clear: corporations.

      Now as what it's really meant to protect, well, the PTO has clearly lost sense of that! ;)

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    31. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something about "lie detectors", "scientology e-meters", and "work" just doesn't fit considering that the first two are bullshit devices with no sound scientific background. I guess if by "work" you mean "is used to deceive" then yes.

    32. Re:This might be valid by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      They measure resistance conducted through the human body. Any standard electronic voltmeter can be programmed to measure resistance in the low ohm range.

      Does this work on anyone, or are there potential problems with variations from one person to another? I worked a summer job once in a lab where, to kill some time, we used the equipment to measure basic electrical properties of ourselves. As I recall, my skin resistance (measured from one hand to the other) was a small fraction of everyone else's. I also seemed to have a much greater capacitance. Would I be a good bus, or a bad one?

    33. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:
      The company proposes using pulsed AC or DC signals to power the devices. A 100Hz signal could be used to power one device, while a 150Hz signal could be used to power another, the company said, and data signals can be modulated on top of these power signals.

      As I understand it, you must have a working prototype to patent it. "Proposes", "could be used", etc. are all matters of conjecture and, I thought, outside the realm of patents.

      Any patent lawyers here?

    34. Re:This might be valid by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      I am aware of similar work at the MIT Media Lab that's quite a few year's old now. Skin-based power transmission, and also skin-based data transmission had already been demoed by the Gershenfeld group when I worked there in the summer of '99. I don't think the concept itself is novel. The implementation or specifics may be, however.

    35. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you do patent the very idea of a "body bus". It doesn't matter how you arrive at it you'll still be sued. A copyright covers implementation.

      Maybe you're confusing it with a method patent.....

    36. Re:This might be valid by Sebby · · Score: 1
      Really? And when a MS-Liked size bohemoth of a company comes and infringes on your patent, will the system *really* protect you, or will you simply get sued out of existence (in terms of fighting the patent infringment, not you physically)?

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    37. Re:This might be valid by lobotomy · · Score: 1
      Not only that, but IBM had this in 1996:
      Personal Area Networks (PAN):
      A Technology Demonstration by IBM Research
      November 18-19, 1996

      More info at IBM.

    38. Re:This might be valid by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a CB radio from the mid-80's that has a touch-plate along both sides and uses the body of the person holding it as an antenna.

    39. Re:This might be valid by sabernet · · Score: 1

      submit that the the USPTO then:P

    40. Re:This might be valid by xQx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I remember demonstrating the same thing with an electric fence and my sister when I was about 10 ... Still, I think the PO might see a difference between grabbing an electric fence to transfer shock to another nearby person, and turning the body into a LAN.

    41. Re:This might be valid by sirTifiable · · Score: 1

      man alive! give it up. What exactly is going to happen if they have this patent? They have thousands, what have they done so far with them? You think because Microsoft own a patent the rest of the world will pay,,,yeah right.

    42. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Business method" patents. Gotta love 'em.

    43. Re:This might be valid by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I believe prototypes are only required for certain devices, such as perpetual motion machines, that we're pretty darn sure don't exist; thus, the USPTO won't have to waste its time with applications for impossible ideas.

    44. Re:This might be valid by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      They measure resistance conducted through the human body. Any standard electronic voltmeter can be programmed to measure resistance in the low ohm range.

      Problem: The human body is NOT low resistance. There is never a point where our bodys put up less than 350 ohms of resistance. Most the time it's >3500 ohms.

      Furthermore, it wouldn't be a voltmeter used to measure said resistance, it would be at the very least an ohmmeter or a multimeter.

      You'd be surprised how difficult it is to predict the resistance of a human body, anything from wet skin to the type of shoes you're wearing can drastically increase or decrease your ohm rating ;)

      This is the biggest problem with skin-mounted electronic interface devices, calibration is a bitch

      Motiv

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    45. Re:This might be valid by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

      I agree, if the patent and the enforcement of the patent surrounds the particular implementation that Microsoft uses then it could be valid and I wouldn't care.

      However, if this patent is extended to prevent anyone from creating and patenting any other method of using the human body as a bus then it's gone too far.

    46. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry. I though that sending an electronic pulse every time my heart beats might be in fact conveying data, i.e. how often my heart is beating.

      Just because the pulses aren't ROT13d doesn't mean that the device isn't "sending data using the skin as the physical device".

      Patents are a plague of the lazy, moreso now then ever. If you are forced to go out and win every day you either work hard and produce or you lose. Once you have a key patent you go buy a Lear or a dozen Donzi and go play.

    47. Re:This might be valid by Groote+Ka · · Score: 1
      Yeah, if there's no prior art.

      duh...

      I doubt very much whether this is valid.

      I have seen people exchange business card information by means of a handshake at least ten years ago.

      AFAIK IBM introduced a device with which you were able to store business card data in the heel of your shoe and transmit it by means of your body. In digital form.

      Only new here might be the master-slave relationship in claim 1, but I doubt whether this is patentable (I am no US patent attorney...). Dependent claims do not provide substantial subject matter.

      The rest seems pretty obvious. I wonder how long this patent lasts. I've not been able to find any related patent rights in other countries. Furthermore, there is no pre-publication of the application (usually 18 months after filing of the first application), which is AFAIK in indication that they did not file outside the US. Apparently, they do not have a lot of confidence in the right themselves.

    48. Re:This might be valid by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1
      is a patent for "method and apparatus," and spells out exactly what the apparatus is supposed to accomplish. It doesn't prevent others from using human conductivity for other unrelated purposes,
      This looks like the beginning of a very useful technology, and the beginning of a set of proprietary standards. Hopefully Microsoft Research will actually follow through with actual implementations, because everyone could benefit from this. Nobody sane begrudges Apple the few cents they get for every FireWire device manufactured... but this is Microsoft, and we all know that they're evil incarnate, and couldn't possibly be looking at things like this as a means of diversifying their intellectual property portfolio and will instead use it to secure their monopolistic stranglehold on a dying OS and as a reason to sacrifice more cute little kittens.
    49. Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be lacking a sense of what it is that patents actually protect.

      The status quo?

  4. Headline: MS buys PS3 CELL Patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No surprise there.

  5. Hmmm by Ag3nt · · Score: 0

    Well it certainly is an incredible discovery, I just wish that it wasn't Mircosoft that discovered it...

  6. the "Gates of Borg" picture by saforrest · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow, the topic icon of Bill as a Borg seems more appropriate than ever.

    1. Re:the "Gates of Borg" picture by dnamaners · · Score: 1

      ....Unlike the past, more crude, implementations this bus will not require 2 large bolts to be placed in the neck of the reanimated customer. This new procedure offers the complete elimination of the tedious installation procedures on dead tissue and all subsequent reanimation. Coupled with many of the new advances in implant technology the required bolts have been reduced in size and are now placed behind the ears to further lower the cosmetic impact of the procedure. These bolts now also serve as the first of many hardpoints for the the installation of upgrade gear that each of our sl^H^H customers may expect to be required to purchase over the course of their asim^H^H^H^H service contract....

  7. Obligatory by chrispl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great now I can BSOD my brain!

    --
    What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    1. Re:Obligatory by cliffa3 · · Score: 1

      and you forgot that... In Soviet Russia, the patents claim YOU!

    2. Re:Obligatory by JPriest · · Score: 1

      As someone said in the DoCoMo article, this technology might pave the way for the first sexually transmitted computer virus.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:Obligatory by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Great now I can BSOD my brain!"

      It beats thinking in badly spelled poorly documented commands.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Obligatory by HBPiper · · Score: 1

      Also forgotten was:
      "Imagine what we could do with a Beowulf cluster of these!"

      --
      "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
    5. Re:Obligatory by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 0

      Except now it's Blue Skin of Death ... which actually sounds pretty cool, sorta like the fist of death.

    6. Re:Obligatory by chrispl · · Score: 1

      Well there were two posts when I saw this thread and I could not help myself. It happens to the best of us. :p

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
  8. What are you doing there with all these women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A beowulf.

    No, really!

    1. Re:What are you doing there with all these women? by kpansky · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you doing there with those hands?

      Imagining a beowulf cluster.

      --

      --Kevin
    2. Re:What are you doing there with all these women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What are you doing there with all these women?
      A beowulf.


      The only documented occasion on which Beowulf made physical contact with a woman is his fight with Grendel's mother, which he would have lost without divine intervention. Definitely a proto-nerd.

    3. Re:What are you doing there with all these women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a denial of service attack would be more believable.

    4. Re:What are you doing there with all these women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean emulating?

    5. Re:What are you doing there with all these women? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abu Ghraib was a Beowulf clusterfuck.

  9. In other news, riaa speaks out by MDFedderly · · Score: 5, Funny

    When any of your portable devices detect that the DRM has been violated for their IP, they would like the wearer of the device to recieve a powerful electric shock, capable of causing paralysis.

    1. Re:In other news, riaa speaks out by Praufet · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they'll skin you so you can't use the devices anymore.

  10. And in other news... by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Microsoft have announced they are patenting the use of the human body as a energy source for computers.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:And in other news... by nkh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prior art: Larry and Andy Wachowski for The Matrix!

    2. Re:And in other news... by thedillybar · · Score: 2, Funny
      >...Microsoft have announced they are patenting the use of the human body as a energy source for computers.

      Now you don't have to worry about the batteries running out before you fall asleep. Not to mention your diet, those Centrino chips burn more calories than you might think. Soon Microsoft will begin marketing chips alongside Intel...only Microsoft's will be loaded with calories and nutrients.

    3. Re:And in other news... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft Matrix: Where Do You Want Your Probe Today?

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:And in other news... by colinleroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, *laughs*, thanks, I didn't got it 'till you explained!

      --
      blah
    5. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't run too fast, you'll overclock the processor and cause it to explode.

    6. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Microsoft have announced they are patenting the use of the human body as a energy source for computers.

      And the human brain as a device to program them.

    7. Re:And in other news... by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Is this a good time to start speaking about a Microsoft anomaly called "The One"?

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    8. Re:And in other news... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      ...Microsoft have announced they are patenting the use of the human body as a energy source for computers.

      ...and the American public, being so obese, will be the only populace in the world with enough juice to run Longhorn.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    9. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really...
      http://www.iotf.org/publications/Newsle tter/spring 97.htm

    10. Re:And in other news... by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      I saw the headline and thought it was public transportation powered by human corpses, made especially creepy by seeing these green "Energy Efficient" buses a few weeks ago in Seattle.

      "Cadaver inside!"

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  11. Borg Love by mfh · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Microsoft Slashdot icon has never been more accurate that it is with this article. Where are they getting the human skin to test this on? Interns? Seriously, though... just stick your finger into these electrodes, please.

    Now that we can all be Borg, so I just want to know how long before we have Borg incubation chambers? Anyone with kids will back me on this... we need them. I would think the skin bus might cause cancer, wouldn't you? No FUD about it... this could be some scary shit when you consider Microsoft's security record, as well.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Borg Love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an intern in an electronics test lab. I thank god every day that we don't do testing for M$.

    2. Re:Borg Love by dlmarti · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what happens when my wife and I have sex.
      Do the two networks connect?
      Is my watch going to get a virus from her cellphone earings???

      I have now officially coined the phrase "Sexually Transmitted Computer Virus" or STCV's.

      I would love to see the sylibus for the sex-ed classes in 2010.

    3. Re:Borg Love by NecroPuppy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where are they getting the human skin to test this on? Interns?

      Sure.

      Cause you don't build social attachement to MS Interns like you do to rats...

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    4. Re:Borg Love by mschiller · · Score: 1

      The Sex Ed syllabus [Correct Spelling..] will likely not have been updated yet. You don't really expect the health class to keep any more up2date about technology then the computer class do you? Gotta love taking my high school's computer class on 286's... [when the Pentium was main stream, and the pentium pro was state of the Art].

    5. Re:Borg Love by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Funny
      So what happens when my wife and I have sex.
      Do the two networks connect?

      I think the more important question is, "what happens when my girlfriends wants to know what I'm doing with all of these extra 'Client Access Licences'."

      But sweetie, they just came as part of a bundle... I hardly ever use more than two at once...

    6. Re:Borg Love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is my watch going to get a virus from her cellphone earings???

      no, but you are going to get some pussy eating virus she's carrying, because she keeps fucking strangers over and over again

    7. Re:Borg Love by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      'Norton - TSR for her'

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    8. Re:Borg Love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      syllabus. :)

    9. Re:Borg Love by ibjhb · · Score: 1

      I think that the girlfriends would be more concerned with each other... ;)

    10. Re:Borg Love by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 0
      So what happens when my wife and I have sex.
      Is my watch going to get a virus from her cellphone earings???

      Does your wife talk on the phone while having sex? Dude, talk of frigidity!

    11. Re:Borg Love by Genda · · Score: 1

      Aaaaahhhhhh...

      Now we know why aliens perform anal probes... They're just Microsoft employees from some distopian future looking to get a good sample reading from a point of low resistance...

      Genda

      "Skin resistance is futile, you will all be assimilated!" -- Bill Gates (circa 2010)

    12. Re:Borg Love by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      Worse yet could STCVs cause problems in the wetware...

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    13. Re:Borg Love by 0utRun · · Score: 0

      > So what happens when my wife and I have sex.

      Wait .. you're married?

  12. The difference is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DoCoMo isn't Microsoft.

  13. Does this work??? by bollow+(a)+NoLockIn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This sounds very much like science fiction to me. Are there any proof-of-concept studies in this direction?

    My gut feeling is:

    • Data transmission: maybe, but bandwidth will be low.
    • Power supply: won't work
    --
    Under construction: swpat politics overview article
    1. Re:Does this work??? by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA, the DoCoMo technology said they can exchange data between people at up to 10 meg. The DoCoMo tech lets users exchange email address and "buisness card" data with a handshake. Cool stuff.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Does this work??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excerpt 3001 final odyssey, arthur c. clarke

      I believed that I had invented the palm-to-palm transfer of information, so it was mortifying to discover
      that Nicholas ("Being Digital") Negroponte (Hodder and Stoughton, 1995) and his MIT Media Lab have
      been working on the idea for years...

    3. Re:Does this work??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny you should mention science fiction because I remember reading a story eons ago about a similar type setup. I don't remember the author or the name of the story so if someone can help me out, please do. It was published in a science fiction book about the size of Readers Digest and about as thick. It was composed of a bunch of short stories from various authors.

      Basically the female singer of a rock group wore a body suit which had filaments of thin metal (aluminum?) embedded in it. She also had a small receiver which she wore.

      Each member of the audience was given a metallic headband to wear. The headband would pick up the electrical power from each person and then shoot it to the singers suit. This allowed the singer to act as an antenna and then use the power for the microphone as well as other things (can't remember exactly).

      Now comes the plot of the story so if you don't want to know what happens click back.

      The singer wanted to kill herself. She was just tired of the whole rock life and just wanted to end it. Problem was the suit had built in safety features which prevented it from overloading (good idea). She finally was able to enlist the aid of the sound board engineer who agreed to override the safety features.

      During the closing number of a show she turned to him and gave him the signal to go ahead and do his thing. He still has doubts about doing so but does it anyway and as she holds the last note of the last song she turns into a bright white flash as the all the power from every person in the audience suges through the suit turning her into a crispy critter.

      The story ends with the guy losing his job and an investigation which reveals it was an accident.

    4. Re:Does this work??? by letoworm · · Score: 1
      My gut feeling is: Data transmission: maybe, but bandwidth will be low. Power supply: won't work
      You're right. Some of us have a hard enough time passing things through our guts.
    5. Re:Does this work??? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      And how could they possibly exchange data between people without a common ground?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:Does this work??? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Hand shake.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    7. Re:Does this work??? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. The users all wear heavy copper ankle chains.

      --
      resigned
  14. If it rains... by dickeya · · Score: 2, Funny

    stay home. And don't ever move to Seattle.

  15. Upon further research by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are also patenting the human built-in telescopic antenna array. Unfortunately, it will only be available to approximately 50% of the population.

    1. Re:Upon further research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      array?? how many do you have?

    2. Re:Upon further research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One long band and two dome antennae.

  16. It's power not data by malefic · · Score: 5, Informative

    DoCoMo's research is to transfer data via the body, which IBM also has done research (and most likely has some patents on). The MS patent is to power non-powered devices by having a power supply somewhere else that transmits the current through the skin. Similar, but different.

    1. Re:It's power not data by redko · · Score: 1

      The fuel to create this power is methane (supplied by the body) of course.

  17. Handshaking by nucal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I guess this might ultimately allow the transfer of data literally through a handshake ...

    1. Re:Handshaking by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      And bring new meaning to the words "male and female connectors".

    2. Re:Handshaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory Simpsons Quote:

      George Stephanopoulos: Uh, Mr. President, Sir. People are becoming a bit... confused by the way your and your opponent are, well, constantly holding hands.

      Clinton: We are merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it.

    3. Re:Handshaking by earthman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Already some years ago I have read somewhere (link, anyone?) about how this kind of technology could be used to automatically exchange virtual business cards when you shake hands with someone. So this isn't exactly something new.

    4. Re:Handshaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall that, too, and it seems to me it was an IBM research.

    5. Re:Handshaking by Ske · · Score: 0

      It probably has interesting ramifications for privacy and security of personal information.

      Imagine being able to simply brush up against someone in order to access all the information available on their "personal network".

    6. Re:Handshaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      some people at the MIT were working on this some years ago

    7. Re:Handshaking by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes -- see IBMs paper on the subject.... note the date of the -prior art- demonstration: November 18-19, 1996 -- Microsoft filed their patent April 27, 2000. I wonder where they got there ideas from?

    8. Re:Handshaking by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You do realize that two companies can apply for and recieve patents for the same basic idea, provided that the two patets are sufficiently different. Patents don't just protect ideas, they protect implimentations, hence the reason patents are public. Anyone can use your idea, they just have to improve it.

      As an example, AM radio and FM radio are two different implimentations of the same basic idea. They're more likely than not, sufficiently different to warrant seperate patents.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    9. Re:Handshaking by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 1

      I understand. I am concerned with the individual claims -- not the patent as a whole --see my other post for more thoughts on this here.

  18. Let's see... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was 5 I discovered electricity for myself by sticking a fork in an outlet. Thereby proving Benjamin Franklin right and developing prior art to use against Microsoft. Ah, the follies of youth.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Let's see... by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      For some reason I read "Ah, the joules of youth"...

    2. Re:Let's see... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      Yes. Those were the family joules.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  19. Wait a minute... by Ag3nt · · Score: 1

    Now that I have stopped and thought about it, how are they going to prevent electrical shocks when the devices/person come in contact with a conductive material...

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      By not using currents or voltages that could cause a noticeable shock...

      It's not a difficult concept, the human body is just a mildly poor conductor. It'd be like getting a patent for sending data across a big, meaty resistor.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  20. Seems original enough by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

    It's sure as hell not obvious to me, and I haven't heard of anyone else doing it yet?

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:Seems original enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes far back as 'Animal Electricity' discovery that electric impulses can trigger muscules to contract.

      I think M has a list of keyword conbinations with low frequency of occurance in filed patents and trying to fill up to void.
      ~omi

  21. Microsoft calls this tech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...ActiveHerpes.

    I prefer to pick up my own viruses and worms, thank you. I don't need MS "delivering" them to my skin.

  22. Dangerous? by k4_pacific · · Score: 0

    This sounds like something that would cause cancer.

    Oooohh... I can't wait for the class action lawsuit.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Dangerous? by mstorer3772 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Horse shit.

      There is no proof that RF causes cancer. Heard of an class action suits against cell phone manufacturers? No. You haven't.

      Why?

      Because this is horse shit.

      Those little healing magnets you wear to align your shakras/amplify your aura/whatever-BS-they-foisted-off-on-you? Horse Shit.

      Yes. You heard it here first.

      As penence, you must watch no less than 5 episodes of Myth Busters. (not really punishment, but at least you'll be less likely to fall for this stuff in the future)

      --
      Fooz Meister
    2. Re:Dangerous? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      As penence, you must watch no less than 5 episodes of Myth Busters.

      I was in total agreement with you till this point. I enjoy Myth Busters too, but their "experiments" are anything but scientific. They rarely use any sort of control. They don't cover all the variables. They don't record any real data. It's fun to watch, and it helps dispel some of the more implausible myths, but I wouldn't trust those guys to tell me whether or not RF energy could give me cancer. They simply don't have the skill as scientists and experimenters.

      Like I said, the show is cool. But completely unscientific.

    3. Re:Dangerous? by Reedo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Penn & Teller (on an episode of Bullshit! last year) debunked magnet therapy too. It doesn't do anything whatsoever (surprise) aside from a placebo affect which they were able to duplicate via a series of phoney (and ridiculous looking) treatments in a random mall.

      People WANT this stuff to work, and thus are easily tricked into thinking it really does.

    4. Re:Dangerous? by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      You have to admit, though, that people DID seem to enjoy that Snail Treatment they gave... I shall bring it to the market under the Brand name Plah-See-Boh (I, uh... got that from the types of snails I use. Yeah. That's the ticket).

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    5. Re:Dangerous? by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 0

      Wow, I'm convinced. Thanks for your well formed arguments.

    6. Re:Dangerous? by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1

      Ever so glad to be of service.

      Seriously though. All profanity and TV promotion aside, the class-action thing stands on it's own. That'd be headline news. EVERYONE has a cell phone, and every news agency in the world would fall on that story "like a pack of ravening wolves".

      Quick! Name that movie. No, I don't have ADD, why do you... OOh! Pretty!

      --
      Fooz Meister
  23. Microsoft sponsered underwear? by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1, Funny

    Body bus enabled Active X pronographic vibromatic undergarments will bring new and pleasurable levels to all your
    pron needs.

    Can't wait until the first bus fault.

    How about linking multiple body buses in a free for all?

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
    1. Re:Microsoft sponsered underwear? by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Finally a Microsoft product that I would gladly hand over money for ... XBoxers.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:Microsoft sponsered underwear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about linking multiple body buses in a free for all?

      That requires additional licensing.

    3. Re:Microsoft sponsered underwear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got lightning! ...

      In my pants!

    4. Re:Microsoft sponsered underwear? by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

      Can't wait til the overclockers get ahold of you.

      --
      Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  24. So, instead of each device having a speaker... by foxtrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...a relatively small, cheap speaker, each device will instead have a relatively large, expensive widget to use our nerves as cat-5 (human-5?) so we only have to shlep around one little speaker?

    They are kidding, right?

    -JDF

    1. Re:So, instead of each device having a speaker... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No.

      Instead of each device having a battery and a wireless radio, each device will have a data I/O and a power I/O device. You'll be able to have one efficient battery power your watch, PDA, cell phone, and display-eye-wear.

    2. Re:So, instead of each device having a speaker... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Actualy, I can see a great use for just that example alone. Your average business man at any given time probably has at least 1 cell phone, one watch, and one data device on him. Each of those devices has a speaker, and each of them uses it for different purposes. Now imagine, instead of his phone going off or his alarm going off and disturbing those around him, it sends it's tiny signal along his skin to to a small speaker by his ear, which then produces the sound, loud enough for him to hear but soft enough to not disturb others. Instant hands free setup and less annoying for the individual than a headset and wires.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  25. In related news... by dfn5 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Microsoft sues Mother Nature over patent infringment for striking a golfer dead with lightning.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  26. Oh great by foidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I beta tested the stuff, and now my butt won't stop rebooting...

    1. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just clean up the mess after unexpected core dumps.

    2. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I hope your ass is set on mini crash dump or you're going to be sore as hell tommorrow.

    3. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to make sure that you close any open ports.

    4. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahah

    5. Re:Oh great by bmiller949 · · Score: 0

      Better patch those security holes...

      --
      <sig>no sig</sig>
    6. Re:Oh great by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 1

      Better install a firewall so you don't get any viruses from your open port.

    7. Re:Oh great by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      No core dumps here, just a bunch of leaks.

    8. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gives a whole new meaning to 'Bus error'

    9. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget to flush the buffer when you're done.

  27. good luck MS by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    A personal area network (PAN) is a technology that could enable wearable computer devices to communicate with other nearby computers and exchange digital information using the electrical conductivity of the human body as a data network. For example, two people each wearing business card-size transmitters and receivers conceivably could exchange information by shaking hands. The transference of data through intra-body contact, such as handshakes, is known as linkup. The human body's natural salinity makes it a good conductor of electricity. An electric field passes tiny currents, known as Pico amps, through the body when the two people shake hands. The handshake completes an electric circuit and each person's data, such as e-mail addresses and phone numbers, are transferred to the other person's laptop computer or a similar device. A person's clothing also could act as a mechanism for transferring this data.

    The concept of a PAN first was developed by Thomas Zimmerman and other researchers at M.I.T.'s Media Lab and later supported by IBM's Almaden research lab.

    sorry but MIT and IBM is way ahead of Microsoft in this with prior art.

    hell I made a example prototype from the information I recieved from mister Zimmerman back in 1997 for playing around with PAN's when i was heavy into the wearable computing research.

    Microsoft, what Idea can we steal today?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:good luck MS by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      hell I made a example prototype from the information I recieved from mister Zimmerman back in 1997 for playing around with PAN's when i was heavy into the wearable computing research.

      Is that why your handle is "Lumpy"? :-)

    2. Re:good luck MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope that comes from my early college days. from football really.... it was fun beating the tar out of the jocks that hassle geeks... during practice, I would steamroller em' and say..."watch what geeks you mess with buddy..." cince I was good at giving them their "lumps" and am over 6 foot tall and built like a brickhouse, I was knighted "lumpy".

    3. Re:good luck MS by kakos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They aren't patenting PANs, they are patenting a particular method of implementing a PAN. Nice try at MS bashing though.

    4. Re:good luck MS by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suggest you actually READ the patent. they are trying to patent data transfer (PAN) and power transfer.

      if they weren't trying to sneak the data stuff in there I would not have a problem with it, but they are trying to submarine the PAN data technology into their own patent.

      strip out everything to do with data and I'll love the fact they have a patent on a new idea.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:good luck MS by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 5, Informative

      The MS patent actually references several other patents, including:

      5796827 which is IBM's for the hand-shake data transfer.

      6104913 IBM's PAN

      and
      6211799 MIT's on power/data transmission over the body.

      Obviously they are building on previous patents, and have come up with an enhancement.

      Or the patent office just rubber stamped it :-)

    6. Re:good luck MS by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I suggest you actually READ the patent. they are trying to patent data transfer (PAN) and power transfer.

      Their technique is different from other/previous inventions because the powered device can transmit and use power/data without actually having its own power source. Therefore they're not trying to patent PAN.

      Quote: Because the devices of the present invention are networked, they can be recharged and powered by other devices on the network.

      IBM's and others' PAN devices all have their own power source (at least News.com reported that IBM's device had the size of stack of cards).

    7. Re:good luck MS by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      So you could transmit a virus through a bodily contact...



      I mean a computer virus.

      --
      Store with salt
    8. Re:good luck MS by Malor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm really not sure this is a very good idea.

      The body is a very complex beast, and has evolved to work in ways we simply don't understand yet. Adding our own signals to the body's natural electromagnetic field may be completely harmless, but it could also have strange, unpleasant side effects over time.

      Personally, I don't plan to carry any such device until they've been on the market, and in fairly wide uptake, for at least 10 years. I'm generally an early adopter of almost anything, but this technology worries me a little.

    9. Re:good luck MS by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the only diffrence between Microsofts patent and IBMs PAN is the power distrabution grid?
      I sort of missed out on all the PAN research myself becouse I was focused on the step power generator created to power wearables.
      Now how do you suppose they get all that power from the foot to the head? I didn't see any wires leading down the leg in the prototype.

      I found the whole talk of power distrabution to be boring so I phased it out. Someone else might know.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    10. Re:good luck MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in my first year of physics at university, a lecturer demonstrated the use of skin to transmit power. Using a high frequency, high voltage source he touched with his right hand, he was able to start fluroescent lighting and run a HeNe laser with his left. He was of course insulated from the ground. If only he had the foresight to run a speaker instead (and have a few hundred corporate lawyers employed with time on their hands, of course) he'd be rich.

    11. Re:good luck MS by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      I'm no engineer but here's a quote:

      "High frequency currents can travel through the human body without danger, and they were believed to have relieving and tonic influences. Although electrotherapy is not so popular in present medicine, similar techniques find several implementations even today. "

      http://www.mercury.gr/tesla/transen.html

  28. Why didnt I think of that by stecoop · · Score: 1

    proliferation of wearable electronic devices such as wristwatches

    For every patent somone says, "Why Didn't I patent that?". Now if I would have gathered a team of lawyers and a little money; I could collect roylties for all the users of wristwatches (by the way I better cease wearing mine)....

  29. Legit? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 0

    Much as I hate to admit it.... This does seem like a legitimate thing to patent. If it weren't Microsorft, I'd be cheering for the Patent Office actually doing something right for once.... That is IF there is no prior art. Which I have no idea about.

    BTW- can I patent the recursive Fibonnacci algorithm??

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  30. H4x by Ag3nt · · Score: 1

    If devices come out in the future that use this interface with internet connectivity, does this mean that you could hack a person?

  31. If this was not Microsoft... by Woodrow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    would anyone have any objections to this patent? This patent covers a physical device made of atoms just like 100% of all patents applied for 100 years ago. I do nto agree with sofwtare patents but I do with patents covering physical devices.

    1. Re:If this was not Microsoft... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course not! If Steve Jobs (not to be confused with his close relative that Clinton talks about in his new book) were to have developed this so your iPod could talk to your Newton, everyone here would be drooling and saying "OOOH! Steeevie, you're SO SMART" and camping outside the Apple Store to buy one.

      Give Microsoft a break here! The invented some physical device and they have a great reason to patent it.

  32. Anyone who has ever been electrocuted by dpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    has violated this patent. Plus the old experiment in school, where the whole class holds hands in a string, and the person on each end each touches one lobe of a Van Der Graff generator. Everyone's hair rises, and whoever breaks the circuit gets the shock - but there was a circuit and power was being delivered, it was even doing work.

    Here's the problem:

    Patents are being awarded for spending a little time thinking. For having the luxury of free time to think, and company lawyers to file, companies are able to establish themselves as a gatekeeper.

    Patents should be the product of effort - they were meant to reward that effort, and incent you to expend that amount of effort again in the future.

    IMHO, these 'few hours of thought' patents are diametrically opposed to the concept of patents as enumerated in the Constitution.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Anyone who has ever been electrocuted by coffee+addict · · Score: 1

      It's transmitting power to devices worn on the body. Transferring electricity to your hair probably doesn't count as a device worn on the body (unless... well... you know. It's not real...) I would agree with the second part of your comment though.

    2. Re:Anyone who has ever been electrocuted by isd_glory · · Score: 1

      Yeah... read the patent next time.

      "A pulsed DC signal or AC signal may be used as the power source. By using multiple power supply signals of differing frequencies, different devices can be selectively powered"

      What they're doing is more than running straight DC/AC through the human body. That old experiment where everyone holds hands and touches Van De Graff generators relies on static electricity, as well as a modest attempt to complete a circuit. The patent seems to describe how to to get power through the body (not just over, like static electricity), without having the benefit of having a "ground." It also describes methods of sustaining different power requirements for different devices by modifying the frequency at which the power is pulsed. Cool stuff indeed.

  33. Florida owes royalties by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    Next time someone goes to the chair, Florida owes royalties, big time!

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  34. IBM did this years ago. by swngnmonk · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember IBM had a demo product that would exchange virtual business cards via a handshake - it might well have been a plug-in to a Palm Pilot They theorized max xfer at 2400bps at the time - this was 1996-7 or so. Still looking for the link.

    --

    'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

    1. Re:IBM did this years ago. by swngnmonk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Found it.

      It was an IBM researcher by the name of Tom Zimmerman who created a "Personal Area Network", back in 1996: Personal Area Networks (PAN): A Technology Demonstration by IBM Research.

      Looks and sounds a lot like what MSFT just patented.

      --

      'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

    2. Re:IBM did this years ago. by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1
      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    3. Re:IBM did this years ago. by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Looks and sounds a lot like what MSFT just patented."

      Nah... It couldn't be. The USPTO wouldn't make a mistake like that. I mean they research every patent that they approve.

      --
      Hmmm.
    4. Re:IBM did this years ago. by YouTalkinToMe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, in the patent they cite:

      "Personal Area Networks: Near-field intrabody communication"; IBM Systems Journal, vol. 35, No. 3&4, 1996 --MIT Media Lab, 11 pages.

      so I assume that the patent adds something to what was done at IBM.

    5. Re:IBM did this years ago. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      so I assume that the patent adds something to what was done at IBM.

      In this case it must have been a little more than adding ".. with a computer" to the end of it. :^) I thought Dallas Semiconductor had done stuff like this with their iButton single wire gizmos, but I don't see any mention of using the body as the single wire.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:IBM did this years ago. by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC, couldah sworn I saw a NOVA episode with Alan Alda on this topic, and he transmitted data via his hand at low speeds (300bps?). This was way a while ago.

      Boy do I wish I could afford to submit a patent application!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    7. Re:IBM did this years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As has been said umpteen times before, Microsoft is *shock* using the patent office for its intended purpose: patenting an implementation instead of an idea. In this case, they've come up with a way to do this without each device needing its own power source (something the MIT lab didn't do).

      It's not revolutionary; it's just something a little bit clever which builds on what was already known. This is the reason the patent office exists (not to say it's a good thing).

  35. This has to be a joke by snipersock · · Score: 1

    This has to be a joke of some kind. Not only is microsoft making a 'personal area network' out of your body, but they are patenting the idea. I just have a hard time understanding that they plan on having data actuall flow through us to and from the devices. Wtf happens if one gets a viri?

    1. Re:This has to be a joke by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Actually, think about it. Your watch is also a smartcard / PDA. Touch the computer mouse and you are logged in, and your watch PDA syncs too.

      Yeah, could do this with bluetooth, but BT is power hungry. Perhaps you could recharge your PDA watch this way too.

      But why oh why did it have to be MS? WinCE on a watch PDA? No thanks.

    2. Re:This has to be a joke by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Wtf happens if one gets a viri?

      Umm.. well, a physical virus wouldn't affect the conductivity of your surface skin (unless it makes you sweat, but then the tech will only work better, I'm sure) and a software virus would do exactly the same thing that it does now with any other sort of network of disimilar devices (what about your BT phone, laptop, PDA, printer network? Wtf happens if one gets a virus?)

    3. Re:This has to be a joke by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Considering that executioners using the electric chair have demonstrated prior art, using the skin to send a "You're Terminated!" message to the convict ... :-)

  36. We are the Borg by shachart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Resistence is futile... errr... patented.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
    1. Re:We are the Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built a touch switch that worked on this exact principle back when I was in high school. It worked by bridging a circuit that would turn on a transistor that drove a relay. I used it to control track switches in a Lionel train set.

      It didn't transmit a lot of data (1 bit) but the idea is not novel. It is also intuitively obvious to any one who has spent time playing around with mosfets.

  37. My thoughts exactly. by Brandon+Glass · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess Kevin Warwick will enjoy the prospect of the Personal Area Network as described above, though. Now if only we could find a way to embed these devices directly into the skin and/or find a way to connect the input jacks directly into our brains...

    (For those who don't know, Kevin Warwick is Professor of Cybernetics at Reading University, and performed an experiment on himself by implanting a tracking device into his arm, which allowed computers to determine which room he was in, and make judgements based on his position).

    1. Re:My thoughts exactly. by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      perhaps someone could implant something right up his pipes, the horrible little self-agrandising worm.

    2. Re:My thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an infrequently updated page about Warwick here.

    3. Re:My thoughts exactly. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing a National Geographic documentary from the 80s about the successful connection of an electronic black-and-white camera to a blind man's brain.

      Personally, I've always wanted to be able to type and use a mouse through such a connection...

    4. Re:My thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would like to type and use a mouse through a camera connected to a blind man's brain??? :-)

    5. Re:My thoughts exactly. by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      More information on Kevin Warwick, a.k.a. Captain Cyborg here: here, here, and here
      The folks over at El Reg are bigs fans of him ;-)

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    6. Re:My thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BFD! That whole thing always gave me a chuckle - I mean he used the same sort of thing that's used in commercial cattle and sheep by the boatload. Now, if he'd been doing a 1 minute mile on implants, or telecommuting from his cranium, well, then he'd have something to crow about. But for a RFID? (rolls eyes)

      A tempest in a teapot!

      You want cool? How about a fuel cell for your implants that runs on blood sugar? Dude, my cell phone is low! Gimme a Dew! Just implant it and plumb it to the nearest vascular supply and let the body maintain equilibrium.

      Just don't shuffle going across that wool rug. ESD hazard.

      -Otto

    7. Re:My thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read about this project at CalTech in print a while ago. Monkeys playing computer games using a brain interface instead of a manual controler. It's mentioned here: http://scicom.ucsc.edu/SciNotes/0201/lo/mind/

  38. Awesome by isd_glory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Borg coments aside, I'd love to see this work. Turning the human skin into a data path has wonderful medical applications. Imagine being able to monitor pacemakers, hearing aids, and other prosthetic devices non-invasively.

    Furthermore, this could open up the prospect of "implants" to help humans with different things. If Microsoft can really get data and power running through the human body, it could really usher in a new age of computing.

    1. Re:Awesome by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1
      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    2. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Furthermore, this could open up the prospect of "implants" to help humans with different things. If Microsoft can really get data and power running through the human body, it could really usher in a new age of computing.

      I can see the Slashdot comments already: "MSDN has had a patch available for that Parkinson's bug six months ago! If you don't stay current, it's your own damn fault! Patch early, patch often, Twitch Boy."

      No thanks. I'll keep suffering along with a speaker in my PDA and one in my phone.

  39. Power conduit, not supply by Sajma · · Score: 1

    Lots of people are joking about MS using the body as a power supply, which is not what this is claiming.

    They want to use the body as a power *conduit*.

    One word: bzzzzzzt!

  40. Underwear virus by Benanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm just worried about the potential security vulnerabilities. I mean, imagine someone running down the street, flailing their arms wildly, screaming "My underwear's been infected by a virus! I can't take it off!"

    1. Re:Underwear virus by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      I was thinking almost the same thing. So now I'll have to worry about brushing up against people so that A) I won't catch the flu and B) I won't acidentally download trojans and pr0nware from their implants.

      No thanks, I'll stick with the laptop.

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    2. Re:Underwear virus by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      *Finally*!

      The Underpants Gnomes develop Phase Two: Anti-Virus Software for Underwear.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  41. IBM has prior art. by kulakovich · · Score: 1


    Personal Area Network used a pager sized device to store "business-card" type data, which was transmitted from one PAN user to another PAN user via the physical handshake of their owners.

    Obviously the US Patent Office needs to get off its collective ass and read Slashdot.

    kulakovich

  42. Soylent Windows... by Jrod5000+at+RPI · · Score: 1

    is PEOPLE!!

  43. Dongle by pete-classic · · Score: 1
    PDAs (worn on people's belts)


    Neither my PDA nor my belt makes routine contact with my skin. And I tuck my shirt in . . .

    So, I'd need some sort of, uh, dongle that goes down my pants.

    Uh. Hu-huh.

    -Peter
  44. But Wait!!! by Ag3nt · · Score: 1

    I agree but, still....its Mircosoft. I don't trust them on my computer. Why would I trust them on/in my body?

    1. Re:But Wait!!! by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Can you imagine the problems a crash could cause?

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:But Wait!!! by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. They couldn't even handle the power management on my laptop, and they think I'm going to let them run power through my body?

  45. Exchange viruses by touch alone! by Elphin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait until the first virus is written for such a system which can be spread by touch alone!

    "Damn, I've got the Blue Arm of Death! Could someone press my reset switch for me"

    1. Re:Exchange viruses by touch alone! by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      Funny comment aside, I was going to mention this myself until you beat me to it. As I mentioned in a previous thread, this would indeed revitalize an old transmission vector for viruses (assuming it takes off). Now a man would only have to touch you to infect you. We could be standing next to a Typhoid Mary and not even know it. Personal space would become more than just a comfort zone, it would be a safety zone.

      "Wear a glove man, protect yourself. You never know what kind of dirty people are out there."

      Huzzah for hardware firewalls.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  46. You Gotta Have Skin by scottennis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You Gotta Have Skin
    (Alan Sherman)

    You gotta have skin,
    All you really need is skin
    Skin's the thing that if you've got it outside
    It helps keep your insides in

    It covers your nose,
    And it's wrapped around your toes
    And inside it you put lemon meringue
    And outside, you hang your clothes

    Skin is what you feel at home in
    And without it, furthermore
    Both your liver and abdomen
    Would keep falling on the floor
    (And you'd be dressed in your intestine)

    A Siamese twin
    Needs an extra set of skin
    And when the doctor knows that you're feelin' sick
    Where does he stick his needle in?
    In the end of your skin

  47. Ben Franklin has you beat!!! by AetherBurner · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ben Frankin and lightning - prior art. Anyone who touched the input of an audio amp and heard a buzz or an AM radio station - prior art. Anyone who walked across a carpet and shocked someone on the ear - prior art. ROTFLMAO!!!!

  48. DoCoMo by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

    I am sure if DoCoMo was concerned they would have filed a patenet in the USA. As it is they don't really do business here so it seems kind of pointless o pay to register a patent here.

    The might have been able to make a boat load of money, but I guess that is a gamble they didn't take.

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
  49. Overly broad by erick99 · · Score: 1
    Using the human body as, essentially, a "common return" is a logical place for technology to go. I think issuing a patent for it is a bit overly broad. It's almost like issuing a patent for the "sidewalk" as a method for allowing people to walk from one place to another without stepping on grass, etc.

    Happy Trails!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  50. Body Buzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Body Buzz? Sounds good to me! ;-)

  51. Yes, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... where do you insert the fuse ?

  52. See IBM by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's some prior art for data transmission:
    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/ pan/pan.html

    Where MS patent is different is they claim to do _power_ transmission as well.

    I wonder about a Mr Tesla...

    That said, I'm personally not comfortable with the idea of transmitting significant amounts of electrical power through my body- even low level power. Not sure what the side effects would be.

    Already there are some studies that indicate that electromagnetic fields do affect the body AND brain.

    --
    1. Re:See IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially since it's MS Software controlling how much power...

    2. Re:See IBM by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      That said, I'm personally not comfortable with the idea of transmitting significant amounts of electrical power through my body- even low level power. Not sure what the side effects would be.

      Well, that nervous twitch, for one thing... probably due to nerve damage.

      And then there's that "Blue Face Of Death" thing you do when you're under a lot os stress.

      And the fact that it only goes away when someone kicks you in the butt. You should seriously see a doctor about that.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  53. Mod parent down! Re:IBM has prior art. by kulakovich · · Score: 1


    Mod me down for typing so damn slow that someone beat me to the punch!

    Curses!

  54. Physiological-Sexual Implications of this tech by MacGoldstein · · Score: 3, Funny

    I stumbled across this link, and although it strictly deals with bandwidth (not also with power, as in the Microsoft technology), it must be posted.

    Because, although many of us have suspected it before, it is now pretty much obvious that sooner or later, penises will have higher bandwidths than cable modems.

    Brings a whole new meaning to the networking term "trunk".

    I can see it now:

    Defendant: No, no, no your honor, you've got it all wrong! Her battery died and I was just jumpstarting her devices!
    Judge: Couldn't you have just shaken her hand?
    Defendant: I thought if we got our juices flowing, maybe the conductivity would be greater?

    ...*ducks*

  55. why not? by twitter · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's a natural, given how much you have to run around to keep the average M$ powered computer going. Might as well stick the operator in a squirrel cage.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD

    2. Re:why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes absolutely no sense. What the hell is an "M$ powered computer"? Are you saying that Intel and AMD processors use a lot of power?

    3. Re:why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be a troll, it might be a community service, but one thing is for damn sure... This guy's got too much time on his hands.

      For chrissakes, buddy. Lighten up, and go find an ewe to have fun with.

  56. This is a good thing by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a new idea. While it has been known for a long time that the body conducts electricity, sending data through the body has not been acheived before. There has to be a good reason for this.

    Presumably Microsoft has solved some specific engineering problems. They also probably spent a lot of money on solving them.

    Why shouldn't they be entitled to financial reward?

    1. Re:This is a good thing by pclminion · · Score: 1
      No, no, and no.

      sending data through the body has not been acheived before.

      MIT did this years ago. It was a cool project, really.

      Presumably Microsoft has solved some specific engineering problems.

      We've known how to stick electrodes on the body for nearly a century.

      They also probably spent a lot of money on solving them.

      I can replicate their results in my den with $10 worth of equipment. I doubt they spent much more than this, plus whatever ridiculous salary the "researcher" was paid.

      Why shouldn't they be entitled to financial reward?

      Because they are an illegal monopoly who continues to press into markets they have no business playing in? And because the idea is frigging obvious?

    2. Re:This is a good thing by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      MIT did this years ago. It was a cool project, really.

      Considering the patent references another device that behaves similarly, it should be obvious that this is a specific implementation.

      We've known how to stick electrodes on the body for nearly a century.

      Yeeeers... It's a good thing they didn't patent that then, isn't it.

      I can replicate their results in my den with $10 worth of equipment. I doubt they spent much more than this, plus whatever ridiculous salary the "researcher" was paid.

      That's part of the reason we have patents. Because the results are easy to duplicate. Could you have come up with the concept? Could you have then worked out what possibilities were a dead end? Of course, I could ask why you haven't done this.

      Here's a home project for you - Come up with a mobile telephone where you can carry the battery in your pocket, attach the microphone to your wrist, have the earpiece inside the ear, and the main body strapped to you belt. An implementation of this would be patentable, and the basic concepts would be worth a lot to the mobile telephone companies.

      Because they are an illegal monopoly

      They are not an "illegal monopoly". Thhey are a legal monopoly who have engaged in illegal monopolistic practices. There is a difference.

      who continues to press into markets they have no business playing in?

      I don't see why they have no business playing in any market. They are a private company and can do what they like.

      And because the idea is frigging obvious?

      It's just a specific implementation.

    3. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the patent references another device that behaves similarly, it should be obvious that this is a specific implementation.

      The patent system is not for patenting implementations.

      Yeeeers... It's a good thing they didn't patent that then, isn't it.

      Look up prior art, Einstein.

      I don't see why they have no business playing in any market. They are a private company and can do what they like.

      No they can't fuckwit. They are (or should be) especially heavily regulated because they are a monopoly. You have no idea what you're on about, do you?

      It's just a specific implementation.

      Which is (or should be) unpatentable.

      You always have to have the last word and think you're right about everything, don't you? You're wrong moron. Will we have to have another huge thread of you "winning" the argument by contradicting yourself?

      Ha ha, stupid retard.

    4. Re:This is a good thing by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Wow!

      You are soooo wrong.

      But since you can't have a civilised argument, I'm not bothering.

      I suggest you look up prior art.

      And also look up the law on monopolistic practices.

  57. RESISTANCE by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2

    IS FUTILE

    ...or at least pretty high... dry skin isn't a great conductor ;-)

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  58. They can have this one by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I agree that anyone who turns himself into a Borg ought to pay royalties to Microsoft.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  59. Priot art by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    I remember reading over a decade ago about IBM developing a way for people to exchange electronic business cards through a serial connection formed when people shake hands. Sounded very cool and I've been watching for it ever since. So using skin to transmit data from one individual to another is out. Also, there is work with FES (functional electrical stimulation, aka artificial nerves) that requires transmiting programing instructions to an implanted computer. So transmiting data from outside to in is out. Finally, a friend's dad had an implanted computer for controling back pain that had power management controled by a magnet. These by themselves would limit MS's claims. Reading them out of context makes it sound too broad. Do a missing element analysis with reference to the specification and prior art and patents make more sense.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  60. Strangling linux by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    When is Microsoft going to patent destroying other useful software because they didn't make it? We all know they do it so why not just admit it and patent something they do rather then stuff other people did several years before

    --
    I like muppets.
  61. the other 50%.. by Hooya · · Score: 3, Funny

    well, with the download well present in the other 50% of the population, data mining just became a helluva lot more fun!

  62. Wrong icon by essreenim · · Score: 4, Funny

    If ever there was justifiable reason to use the Borg icon instead of patent pending, I think this was it ...

    : )

    1. Re:Wrong icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Same joke nearly 20 minutes before this comment.
      (-1 Redundant)

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=112081&cid=9 50 7861

    2. Re:Wrong icon by errxn · · Score: 1

      ...as well as a justifiable reason to post a goatse link to demonstrate what happens when the technology fails...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  63. Violating this patent... by Vaginal+Discharge · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... will cost you an arm and a leg.

    --
    "Glory is fleeting but obscurity is forever" - Napoleon Bonapart.
  64. Lots of Prior Art by linuxtelephony · · Score: 2, Informative

    Several years ago there was someone that created this technology. When two people with PDAs using this technology shook hands, the PDAs used the "circuit" to exchange contact information. The logic went something like, if you shake their hand, you want to share and collect their information. Unlike wireless, you didn't just blindly share your info with everyone in close proximity.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  65. and like most MicroSOFT ... by twitter · · Score: 1
    ... it will get slow and quirky with age. Heavily advertised, third party applications will bring expensive but temporary and bloated relief for a few. Planned obsolescence dooms most unit unless they are turned off most of the time. People who turn to Unix will be happier.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:and like most MicroSOFT ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD

  66. No -- It's power AND data by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft filed their patent (which is titled a "Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body") on April 27, 2000.

    Yet at this web site, http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan.html, there is a white paper (dated November 18-19, 1996) where IBM demonstrates their "new Personal Area Network technology that uses the natural electrical conductivity of the human body to transmit electronic data".

    So, IBM demonstrated similar techniques back in 1996 that used the natural electrical conductivity to transmit data.

    However, Microsoft's claims focus on power, and frequency adjustments, this is basis for their ability to send data.

    One of Microsoft's claims states "modulating an information signal transmitted" using this signal; yet, in the IBM white paper it states that "The natural salinity of the human body makes it an excellent conductor of electrical current. PAN technology takes advantage of this conductivity by creating an external electric field that passes an incredibly tiny current through the body, over which data is carried."

    My gut says that many of MS's claims are voided by prior art -- but one would need to study the MS claims in detail, and compare it to DoCoMo's and IBM's research on the subject, to make a truly educated rebuttal.

    1. Re:No -- It's power AND data by mmusson · · Score: 1

      I remember a television program (Scientific American Frontiers I think) that was showing this technique in action. The demonstration was for electronic business cards. You shake hands which connects the ciruit and the card info is exchanged.

      --
      SYS 49152
    2. Re:No -- It's power AND data by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      So, as there will be a magnetic or electric field change with electric current, what has been transmitted through hand shake could be detected by others.

      So, the fasion of 2010 will be...Total steel cover!

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    3. Re:No -- It's power AND data by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you actually look at the Microsoft patent, you will see that they reference the IBM work as well as the DoCoMo patent. I suspect that if they thought these patents invalidated their application they would have realized it by now. At the very least, the patent examiner would have looked at the refereced patent and determinined they are suficiently different.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    4. Re:No -- It's power AND data by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 1

      "And if you actually look at the Microsoft patent, you will see that they reference the IBM work as well as the DoCoMo patent."

      Haha! I guess that's why I'm not an examiner :)

      "At the very least, the patent examiner would have looked at the refereced patent and determinined they are suficiently different."

      I truly hope so!

  67. "electrocuted" by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The word actually means death by electrical shock. If you got shocked by a Van de Graff generator, and are still alive to talk about it, then you have not been "electrocuted."

    Sorry to nitpick on something so minor. The rest of the points in your comment are completely valid.

    1. Re:"electrocuted" by Akardam · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the "Plus" in his statement.

      On a side note, I guess I should resist the urge to connect "Plus" with "Positive" in a shockingly bad pun... oh, wait...

  68. Prior art exists by tazanator · · Score: 1

    I do belive that a lie dector the police use would qualify as prior art on this patent.

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  69. Royalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the next step for Microsoft is to charge royalties for using this connectivity. "You have skin...we have a patent on it...you owe us $xxx..."

  70. I can just see the spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Want a longer antenna? One month's supply only $19.95"

  71. There goe's my trouble shooting Equipment by CalsailX · · Score: 1

    Guess they will get to sue me for patent
    infringment the next time I use my
    finger to inject 60hz into an
    amp to see if the chip is still alive.

    --
    Great tools do only ONE thing, but do that ONE thing very, very well.
    1. Re:There goe's my trouble shooting Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spectacularly punctuated, sir!

  72. Fuse? by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny

    So where exactly does the fuse go?

    Oh. Ew.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  73. Fine by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    I claim an extension to this idea as prior art in some future lawsuit. The ability to transfer/network data between devices on multiple people... so I can shake your hand and get your contact information. I donate this idea for use by hackers/small guys for free, any corporation must pay $1 per implementation.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Fine by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      Damn, just saw the post a few spaces up that detailed this very idea.

      --
      meh
  74. Power source? by morgdx · · Score: 1

    If all of these devices are using power conducted over my skin, where do I stick the power pack?

    If it's any bigger than an AA cell I'm gonna scream like a pig (cue banjo).

    --
    http://jfin.org/jFin pure java open source financial library
    1. Re:Power source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and, wouldn't these power devices short if you touched someone else? or at least kinda zap them?

  75. Cell Phones = Brain Tumors.... by LabRat007 · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Body Bus = Skin Cancer?

    It will certainly be a while before the long term effects of data or power over skin will be available. The lower levels of the epidermis constantly divide and push older dying cells outward to protect the body (info). Many things can cause improper division and lead to cancer. UV radiation everyone should already know about but so can excessive amounts from other radiant energy sources; such as electromagnetic or microwave. I don't believe short term exposure to low levels of energy have any chance of causeing problems in a healthy adult; but years of exposure over the same areas may be another story. There is no way in hell I want devices sending messages or power across my skin until there is significant data to say its safe.

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    1. Re:Cell Phones = Brain Tumors.... by solarrhino · · Score: 1

      You worry too much. Don't think of it as dying, think of it as upgrading the motherboard.

      --
      "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
    2. Re:Cell Phones = Brain Tumors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but years of exposure over the same areas may be another story"
      Damn, there goes my plans for cybersex via PAN...

  76. I can see it now... by rnilz · · Score: 1, Funny

    Clippy pops up: I see you are crossing the road? Would you like to: Go to starbucks? Go to McDonalds? Walk in front of a bus?

    1. Re:I can see it now... by builderbob_nz · · Score: 0

      Given the reaction that Clippy causes a lot of people, MS better not include that last option or there are going to be a lot of upset bus drivers.

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
  77. I'm thinking of starting the "FOSSie" Religion by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the same way that nothing from a pig goes into a Jewish body, nothing with a Microsoft logo goes into or onto mine...

    It'd bring a whole new meaning to having "worms"...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  78. PRIOR ART by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 5, Funny

    My brain is prior art.
    It gets it's energy from my body, and uses it as a data bus to send messages to my various other parts.

    1. Re:PRIOR ART by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why they specifically said "skin." I think we have our answer...

  79. Why don't you call Zimmerman and ask by bensonandhedges · · Score: 1

    www.ibm.com/whois

  80. And this is insightful how? by Divlje+Jagode · · Score: 5, Informative
    Followed any of the links?

    My gut feeling is:
    • Data transmission: maybe, but bandwidth will be low.
    • Power supply: won't work
    Look, you only had to go as far as the slashdot link:
    Eye of the Frog writes "Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. and its subsidiary NTT DoCoMo Inc. have developed a device that attaches to your PDA which uses the body's conductivity to transmit data at an amazing 10 megabits per second.
    the keywords being amazing and megabits. Please, in the future, keep your gut feelings to yourself.
    1. Re:And this is insightful how? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      Please, in the future, keep your gut feelings to yourself.
      That may be kind of difficult without my new invention: "Lee Press-On Firewalls." The first SPF-50 firewall for Microsoft SkinNet users.
  81. Uh.. you can't patent that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you patent powering a unit by using the body's own electricity? That's like trying to patent the number 9.

    What a crock of shit. Nice try, MS.

  82. Prior art! by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    Hey, I've got prior art!

    I mean, I've been fetishizing "personal" technology for years now by having as many gadgets touching my bare skin as possible. I'm doing it right now.

    Oh darn. Did I just say that out loud?

    ^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h

    ^d^d^d^d^c^c^c^c^z^z^z^z

    --
    -- clvrmnky
  83. Seen it.. but not by MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This idea came up a few months ago, on /. wasn't it? Anyhow, I'm fairly sure it wasn't Microsoft who proposed it...

  84. Trump by mfh · · Score: 1

    > For example, two people each wearing business card-size transmitters and receivers conceivably could exchange information by shaking hands.

    Donald Trump is against shaking hands because of the germs passed in doing so. He prefers the Japanese custom of bowing. I'm reading his latest book which is a pretty cool read, called How to Get Rich. The coolest aspects of this skin bus, I think, are the uses with video games, especially for twitch gamers. Xbox 2 will be *very* amazing now! :-)

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware the advice of the rich - they do not seek company.

  85. Don't be so limited. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    each device will instead have a relatively large, expensive widget to use our nerves as cat-5 (human-5?) so we only have to shlep around one little speaker?

    No, the future is much better than that! Imagine yourself covered in speakers or organic LEDs. They will use your skin to make you into a big billboard. Skin power transference also shows great promise in EULA and copyright enforcement. DMCA mark V will require placement of electrodes on all external genitalia at birth and terrorism, masturbation, pre and post marital sex and other evils will cease to exist.

    Somehow, I'm not impressed. Everyone knows the conductive properties of skin and electro-cardiogram makers have researching human skin electrodes and signaling for decades.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Don't be so limited. by Ignignot · · Score: 1

      Imagine yourself covered in speakers or organic LEDs

      Heh imagine instead a riced-out body! I'll look like I'm tearing ass when I'm sitting still! And if I get high on a little NO2 I'll be able to put a NOS tattoo on my ass! R type baby!

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  86. Media Lab 1995 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Redundant

    MIT's Media Lab invented this tech in 1995. Once again, M$ and the US Federal government collude to monopolize innovation developed by another.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  87. Bus speed increase.... by DJBurgie · · Score: 1, Funny

    When you get struck by lightning, that may be an increase in mega hurtz.

    Once that happens, you will be sued for changing their proprietary technology, violation of the DMCA.

    *sigh*

  88. other ideas stolen? by twitter · · Score: 1
    Electro cardiogram makers might have something to say about the proposed electrode technology.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  89. A message from Microsoft by daishin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have been taken oveExcuse me and allow me to introduce myself, I am a heeelp...linux user, and I would like to announce that Microsoft products are far superior.

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
    1. Re:A message from Microsoft by starflt · · Score: 1
      heeelp...

      Replying to cancel my mis-mod...

      This made me chortle.

  90. This isn't a new idea.... by bryanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Various forms of hearing aids have used this idea for several years. For people with hearing in one ear, you can 'transmit' the sound from the deaf ear to the working ear.

    --bryan

  91. Pirate by azmatsci · · Score: 1

    If you pirate someones network can you take over their body functions? Like a vicious version of the voodoo doll.

    --
    I stole this sig.
  92. Non-geek comment by Wild+Bill+TX · · Score: 0

    I don't care, I take the train!

  93. Contacting IBM? Zimmerman? by zentinal · · Score: 1
    So have any word from Zimmerman or IBM?

    Did IBM already patent this technology or was someone in their IP department asleep at the switch?

    If IBM did file for and receive a patent, how do the two differ?

    Are IBM and Microsoft in for a big patent battle?

    Did the patent office screw up?

  94. One thing M$ will never patent... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    Ejaculation.

    Ogre yells NERDS!!!!!!!!!!

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  95. IBM Patent? by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was a commercial campaign about 1997 or 1996 befor the CeBIT trade fair. That showed 2 business men shake hands and exchange digital business cards.

    Maybe IBM was first in this one....

    Just my 2 (Euro-)Cents....

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  96. Prior Art??? by ColdCoffee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The facts will ultimately show that [insert deity of your choice] has prior art on this patent - It's called the nervous system!

    --
    Sig? - yeah, whatever.
  97. Somewhat seriously... by Omestes · · Score: 1

    Do I have to get a PAN firewall? What about random people touching me (a pat on the back, etc...), could random contact transmit unwanted information, or would information transfer have some form of consent? And what about just inserting info between the source and a perifal(sp)?

    I can see a new PANdemic... sorry... couldn't resist.

    Also, what about people with pacemakers? And doesn't people's skin change conductivity by condition, meaning if I get nervous my sweet new PAN network will stop working, or if I go out in the wonderful Phoenix sun and start to sweat, that changes conductivity.

    Hmm...

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  98. What are you doing with those hands? by YanceyAI · · Score: 1

    Borrowing your keyboard. Furthermore, Microsoft said, the physical resistance offered by the human body could be used to create a virtual keyboard on a patch of skin.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  99. coming to a patent office near you.... by doorbender · · Score: 1

    the Bed PAN.

    --
    "He's a real midnight golfer"
  100. don't worry. by twitter · · Score: 1
    So, I'd need some sort of, uh, dongle that goes down my pants.

    Skin power transfer has shown great promise in EULA enforcement. DMCA part 7 will require electrode implantation on your dongle at birth.

    What, did you think your M$ PAN would work for you? That will get you thirteen volts to the right testicle. Your dog never had it so bad.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:don't worry. by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Wow, that wasn't the direction I was going in at all.

      I guess we are doing a little free association here. When I think of my genitals, I think pleasure.

      Ah, well, to each his own!

      -Peter

    2. Re:don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD

  101. Gates of Borg again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just sounds a little too borgish for me, I refuse to let something use my skin as a media for transmissions, who knows it might start intefering with the brain, this is just like them reading a monkey's brain-waves to control a robotic arm, think about it, if they can read the brain, soon enough they'll be able to write to it, and Microsoft's "Body-Bus" will be right there to allow control and domination of everyone's mind and nobody would think twice. The picture of Billy boy on this topic is not too far off of reality evidently. YOU WILL BE ASIMULATED!

  102. Microsoft already did this! Sheesh! by Stevyn · · Score: 1
  103. Power conduit? by pragma_x · · Score: 1

    I dunno about using skin as a bus to power electronics, but I can see using the body as an antenna to extend the range of wireless devices. For example, the keyless car entry device on my keychain will work from farther away if I press the transmitter to my chin. Any RF geeks out there willing to explain this or elaborate on it?

  104. Yet another patent to fight by mophab · · Score: 1

    This looks like yet another patent to fight. The FAT file system patent is going to be reviewed by the patent thanks to PubPat. This is another one to add to the list.

  105. Pshaw. by superdan2k · · Score: 1

    This won't fly. I read about this stuff being built and working back in the late 90's.

    Prior art, biatches.

    --
    blog |
  106. So many questions come to mind.... by Daredevil73 · · Score: 1

    - With regard to sex, does getting a virus mean a STD or your PAN got hacked?
    - Would sex provide a better power/data conduit than a handshake?
    - Could you get sued by the RIAA if your PAN got hacked via a handshake or more?
    - Could you do peer to peer by holding more than one person's hands?

    Oh the possibilities are endless....

    1. Re:So many questions come to mind.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or here you go:

      Could corporate information be more easily stolen by a really fuckin hot girl seducing a corporate exec?

      Kiss for 1 megabyte.
      ROUGH SEX for the whole company database.

      Hmm, ok, bring it, I'll send my girlfriend to seduce Gates and steal alllllll the source code he carries (he'd be stupid enough to do that too)

  107. Here is the zimmerman Patent by bensonandhedges · · Score: 2, Interesting
  108. So what happens... by kollivier · · Score: 1

    ... when you get a virus on one of these things? ;-)

  109. This is great! by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    Just think of the implications... DRM + This Technology = solutions to politcal problems! The government is going to love this one! Abortion? No problem! Gay Marriage? No problem! Just deny rights for the body bus to perform certain operations...

    --
    FLR
  110. Skin Effect well known & established prior art by ironring · · Score: 1

    ... couldn't resist using this pun. A few EE types should get it.

  111. Found a better one from 1998 by bensonandhedges · · Score: 1
  112. IBM also has prior art... by AaronBaker2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I remember reading about this in Popular Science years ago. IBM developed this in 1996 and called it a Personal Area Network. Read about it here:

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan. html

  113. Hacking at a whole new level. by Mshift2x · · Score: 0

    Now you won't know if it's a pervert just trying to touch you, or a hacker trying to steal your data!

  114. Tasers?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, so when the cops "tase" me for drunk and disorderly, I have to buy all new equipment??

  115. 1995 Wired Article: The Body Bus by theodp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Body Bus
    Tom Zimmerman has shown that the noncontact coupling between your body and weak electric fields can be used to create and sense tiny nano-amp currents in your body. Modulating these signals creates Body Net, a personal-area network that communicates through your skin.

  116. Microsoft products interfacing with my skin? by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    I'll stick with Bluetooth, or perhaps just good old-fashioned wires.

    Does for my headphones.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  117. I wonder how much the MS tax by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will be on cardiograms.

    Will we need to install electric shields around the heart region if we refuse to pay MS tax?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  118. Here's to my skin by poptones · · Score: 1

    It keeps my guts in like a sausage But can a sausage think? Feel the things I feel With my skin? I think not Therefore, I am a sausage

  119. Its not as bad as it seems by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You have to remember that people LOVE to patent something and sue larger corporations like Microsoft. They're probably just being smart & heading off a potential lawsuit when some wise guy decides to patent using skin in this manner & sues the pants off Microsoft in some lame frivolous lawsuit. There are many instances that point the other direction...like Gateway suing the owner of gateway.com, who had owned the domain name long before they came into existance. Microsoft suing over using skin is not likely. I'm pretty sure this is defensive in nature.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  120. Prior Art? by mindseye1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just read an article about a company researching how the human body can actually create small amounts of electricity itself. This would be used to power things like, say, a pace maker. But I'm not sure if this is the same idea that M$ is going for. Anybody know what I'm talking about?

  121. Prior Art! by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a Tatoo be considered Prior Art?

    *bow* *bow*

    --
    -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
  122. my sig by dangerburger · · Score: 1

    finaly my sig makes some sort of sense

    --
    Non-System foot or foot error. remove from mouth and strike any key when ready
  123. Power Transmission by Praufet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those who are defending this patent argue the MS is trying to patent power transfer more so than data transfer might wanna think about the fact that transfer power over your skin is extremely obvious. If the patent office were properly staffed with competent individuals these things would not happen. I mean anyone who has ever been shocked has discovered prior art for power tranfer over human skin.

  124. Does it interface with my tinfoil hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, honey, this isn't a threesome, it's a LAN party!

    Prior art (The electric chair). What data you ask? a 60 Hurts(joke) signal.

  125. Wargrabbing by jewf1sh · · Score: 1

    So how long until wargrabbing becomes a commonplace event? I bet lots of Slashdot folks would love to get their hands on some insecure PANs (pun intended).

    I'll be here all night.

    1. Re:Wargrabbing by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Also known as "frottage".

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  126. Real (and scary) Conversation I Just Had by piecewise · · Score: 1

    Me calling my cousin:
    "Dude, Microsoft just won a patent for electrifying human skin tissue."

    My cousin:
    "Oh my God. Oh my God..."

    Based solely on that reaction, I believe this patent should be revoked!

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  127. Tesla? by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    I know it would be long expired by now, but wouldn't Nikolai Tesla have some kind of patent relevant to this? I mean, the man did send upwards of 50,000 volts through his body in front of large audiences, lighting lightbulbs and whatnot...

  128. My poor Heart by Chucklz · · Score: 1

    I wonder what would happen if my left hand wanted to know what my right hand was doing. Sure it may only be a few microvolts, but I wonder what my heart would think of the whole thing.

  129. Gate vs Borg? by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    Using the bodys natral conductivity is refered to often in a number of sifi storys.
    One group to use this form of networking is called "The Borg"

    It's also used in many RP characters. Fan fiction. Etc.

    In short it's a well travled topic in the sifi arena.

    So did Microsoft actually create the technology to make this possable? Nope someone else did.

    Clue for Microsoft when doing patents like this do it BEFORE a massive body of prior art is created.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  130. Still much better... by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    Imagine being able to simply brush up against someone in order to access all the information available on their "personal network".

    ...still much better than a wireless personal-area-network, a la Bluetooth. At least physical contact is an event which you are generally able to detect and react to. If a stranger brushes up against you or places their hand on your thigh (possibly up your pantleg), you're more than likely to think something of it.

  131. No patent should allowed for... by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    I don't care if it's microsoft or any company. No one should be allowed to patent anything that involves my body, my personal property. If I choose to wire myself to an outlet, no one should be able to claim patent infringement. Next McDonalds will be patenting the process of eating hamburgers with your mouth. You will have to pay McDonalds Corp a small fee anytime you chew a burger from anywhere. It all amounts to the same thing. We seem to be giving Microsoft the exclusive right to say wether or not I can allow the natural abilities of my property to perform their natural functions or not. Maybe I should apply for a patent on my body and charge Microsoft with infringement on my rights. My body is unique and is wholly mine, therefore should be patentable, (or so it seems according to the patenting process). If Microsoft therefore uses my patented product to make their product work, is that not patent infringment if they do not pursue a licensing agreement with me to utilize my property? Where is this all going to stop? I find it extremely disturbing.

    1. Re:No patent should allowed for... by Univac_1004 · · Score: 1

      "No one should be allowed to patent anything that involves my body, my personal property." Patenting something just means that you have to pay someone to use an embodiment of it: paying for a hamburger is a perfect example of embodiment of a patent. But in general, I agree. Self-abuse should be cost-free. =Mr. HairyHands

  132. The new free software analogy by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

    It's not free as in "free beer", it's free as in "free love".

  133. slashdot needs years on their date stamps... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Informative
    the sited article is dated Sunday October 06, @20:37. .. October 6 of what year? This could make the difference between a random reference and verified prior art. (I'm not kidding here... Slashdot posts might classify as prior art in some patent fights).

    In this case, it looks like this one was 2002 (the other option is an unlikely 1996), which is 2 years after MS filed their patent.

    I'm lazy.. I hate having to use cal(1) to figure this out.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:slashdot needs years on their date stamps... by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Not that this makes your point less valid but the year is embedded in the url.

      sid=02/10/07 means Oct. 7, 2002.

      Now, why the url has a date of October 7 and the actual date is Oct.6, I'm not sure.

    2. Re:slashdot needs years on their date stamps... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      Now, why the url has a date of October 7 and the actual date is Oct.6, I'm not sure.

      that's local time. Date stamp is October 06, @20:37. Pacific time. That would be (I think) 3AM GMT on .Oct. 7. Everything in UNIX occurs in GMT.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  134. Old argument revisisted. by mratitude · · Score: 1

    This will finally put an end to the engineering argument over what is or isn't a male/female data connector!

    --


    Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
  135. Where did you want to go yesterday? by twitter · · Score: 1
    Wow, that wasn't the direction I was going in at all.

    It's not my bag either, but we are talking about Microsoft. I'm sure they will market it your way but use it their way, as explained above.

    They see your potential and apply it!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Where did you want to go yesterday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD

  136. Hit Points by nealfunkbass · · Score: 1

    Can this be used to project a little green bar above your head showing how many hit points you have left?

    --
    - Donny was a good bowler, and a good man.
  137. Upgrade path by LiberalApplication · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So I guess this might ultimately allow the transfer of data literally through a handshake ...

    If this becomes a standard, there will have to eventually be upgrade paths... right? I keep imagining things like subdermal conduits for improved bandwidth or current-carrying capacity. Geeks flaunting their gear with brightly colored stripes running down their arms, just beneath the skin.

  138. Cell Phones != Brain Tumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cite one study that successfully demonstrates a CAUSAL (not casual) link between cell phones and cancer.

    1. Re:Cell Phones != Brain Tumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are studies that claim to find a link. There are also plenty of studies that do not find a link. The ammount of paper generated is irrelevent. It's quality and reproducability that's important. Demanding that someone prove their point by weight of paper is not science it's theology.

      Your demand for a single study is no less idiotic than the post hoc fallacy to which you are objecting.

    2. Re:Cell Phones != Brain Tumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleary, the only way to demonstrate the CAUSAL link between brain cancer and cell phone usage is to actually sacrifice humans in a clinical trial. The trial would require positive controls - folks purposly give cancer causeing doeses of radiation aimed directly at their heads. Experimentals - folks using cell phones. Finnally, negative controls - people using no cell phoes at all. I doubt that even the Mighty Pfizer has the political power to pull that one off. Well, maybe in a third world nation.

  139. that is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny because it makes you angry, AC. With language like that, you need a penguin powered Vchip.

    1. Re:that is funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hi twit. u r teh unfunny dishonest evil AC and u cant hide becuase yuo change teh fucking title every single fucking time.

      bye twit.

  140. Parental Censorship by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

    Doctor: "Now say: Big, floppy, donkey dick."
    Cartman: "NO!"
    Doctor: "Success! The child no longer wants to swear!"

  141. No choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it's always in the same place.

    Microsoft Matrix: Your Probe Today.

  142. And in Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Microsoft announces plans to sue legendary
    science fiction writer Ray Bradbury for copyright infringement regarding his famous science fiction story 'I Sing the Body Electric'.

  143. Prior Art by LaimGod · · Score: 1
    Anyone who has held onto a TV antenna in hopes of getting a better signal has done this.

    Fuc|ing Patent Office! G0|) DA|v|N M$ deserves to BURN IN H3LL!!!! ARRGGG!!!!

  144. one little question... by dnaSpyDir · · Score: 1

    wouldn't a touch activated lamp qualify as prior art?

  145. Ohh boy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like I want Microsoft sending current through my body. Blue-Screen-Of-Death takes on whole new conotations.....

  146. Gaw-dam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The last couple of days I've been playing with the idea of a company that consults and designs 'wearable' power supplies that generate power from our movement. Maybe through kinetic energy, or maybe something else, no need to limit ourselves.

    For example, I would think that a reasonable amount of power could be generated by implementing a device in the sole of a shoe.

    So this morning I was pondering about the transportation of the power and I wondered if it would be possible to use the human body directly.

    Well, then I read this.

    The headline could just as well have been 'Forget about it'.

    I hate to say it, but the US is no longer the place for innovation.

    Initially I thought, well, these frivolous patents (and quite honestly, this is not the most frivolous patent, it sounds like) are not a real problem. Especially if there is prior art, then at some point it will come to a lawsuit and it will be proven that there's prior art and that's the end of it.

    The problem with that of course is that you can't fight a lawsuit as a small company against companies like Microsoft. The DOJ has proven this, after all.

    I was thinking of a way to limit the damage that patents do to innovation.

    I came up with some ideas. The gist of it is as follows:
    - a company can not 'sit' on a patent and do nothing with it. If it does not produce a product that makes use of the patent, then other companies are free to use the idea.
    - when a company makes a product that uses their patent, they have to identify in their balance sheets, the added value of the patent. Haven't really thought through exactly how, but maybe they should pay themselves or something.
    - the company can not discriminate when it comes to charging for licenses. In other words if the charge themselves $2 then others can license the same technology for $2 as well.

    not water-tight by any stretch of the imagination but this should solve the problem with companies 'stocking up' on patents, just for the purpose of litigation and at the same time allow other innovations to continue on.

    I think it's absurd that companies can apply so much power through patents. It's just ideas, why should only one entity have all the rights to that idea? Just because they thought of it 2 days earlier?

    1. Re:Gaw-dam... by Desirsar · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to be overlooking the reason Microsoft obtains these patents. Look up their history of patents. You will find a small number of legitimate innovations by Microsoft that they can make a good claim to. You will find a large number of patents that seem frivolous, have tons of prior art, and some are even so vague, they wouldn't stand as a patent if challenged, even without prior art. However, you'll find that they produce or are developing a product that uses the patented idea. The worst that can happen is the patent will have cases of prior art shown, and the idea will become public domain. What does it all mean? No company can sue Microsoft for violating a patent that only Microsoft has ever had (even if it's later ruled invalid due to prior art.) They aren't in the business of "sitting on" patents, they're just protecting themselves because they have the most to lose.

  147. Old Sparky by medvezhatnik · · Score: 1

    I thought that whoever invented the "Old Sparky" should have the rights to this idea. :-)

  148. If it only weren't Microsoft... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    Now we've got to worry about a whole new form of virus. Remember to wear your gloves, folks!

  149. The BSOD just got SCARIER by atarione · · Score: 1

    great M$ technology in my body... Great, what if I get a virus?

    oh yeah m$ lawyers also advise rubbing a ballon on your head and sticking it to wall to amuse your children is now illegal.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:The BSOD just got SCARIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh, the Blue Skin Of Death is a scary prospect ....

  150. You WILL be assimilated, resistance is futile by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't there SCADS of prior art on this topic How the hell does M$ think they are going to repatent Blue Tooth by simply stating all the devides are attached to a human body?

    Of course, if M$ is really smart, they will patent applying mild electric shock to the human skin and GRAFTING these devices to the skin (using the skin as a comm-conduit of course) THEN they might actually have something....oh wait, prior art again....see The Borg legal departmemnt.

    "We are Borg Legal, you will be litigated, resistance is futile, pleabargain is your only option" Come to think of it, isn't that how M$'s legal team works today?

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  151. Prior Art by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Defibulator - power conduit
    EKG - Data Bus

  152. We were warned it would come to this. by bob810 · · Score: 1

    So, now we should all move underground because of the pollution?

  153. shool boy stuff by oliverthered · · Score: 1


    We used to physics expetements at school where you hold each others hands any make a light come on, I'm sure we had to try and be synchronised, that to me is using the skin as a serial bus.

    What about a lie detector test, don't they measure skin conductivity and that kind of stuff.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  154. Bill Gate Borg Icon??? by rwrife · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article clearly calls for the Bill Gates Borg icon instead of the patent pending one.

  155. Hatch's wet dream by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
    When any of your portable devices detect that the DRM has been violated for their IP, they would like the wearer of the device to recieve a powerful electric shock, capable of causing paralysis.

    Senator Orrin Hatch has also requested that if your body devices detect DRM violations, the next time you touch your computer your body bus tazers it so it explodes.

    ctrl-alt-delete this!

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  156. In other news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taser and stun gun users (Zappers and Zappies) may be sued by MS next!

  157. or an arial by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every stuck you finger in tha back of a T.V. arial socket to get a better reception. That's multiple modulated frequencies. If my video pickes up some information from that signal to start recording then I've selectivly activated a device.

    In the audable range, I've used myself as a very noisy conductor for hi-fi equipment before, maybe I had a pizeo attached.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  158. Prior art short list by Felinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IMAO becouse IANAL some of this may not apply.

    Skin networking research at MIT
    The diffrence between MITs prior art and Microsofts patent is the power distrabution.
    But.. DU.. the data is electrical... power distrabution is an implied part of that.

    Any time you have a reliable electrical signal you have a power source.

    Basicly Microsofts patent is a minnor and obveous modification of an existing patent and as I understand it patenting the obveous is not permitted.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  159. USPTO: What happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT DUDE: Somebody set up us the slashdotting

  160. How easy isn't this idea by fluor2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I've thought of this for years, and also I've had some ideas including inserting small heat-devices near veins (inside body) to make the blood transport heat through the body.

    AND I've talked to others that have somewhat thought of similar ideas. I think this patent is just another nail in the coffin for the U.S. Patents.

    Excuse me for being arrogant, but you Americans should really start looking into what's happening.

  161. BSOD takes on a new meaning by neverpsyked · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Well, detective, the coroner's report cited the cause of death as a Blue Skin Of Death."
    There's gonna be some great Law and Order episodes from this one.

    --
    What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
    1. Re:BSOD takes on a new meaning by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      "Well, detective, the coroner's report cited the cause of death as a Blue Skin Of Death."
      There's gonna be some great Law and Order episodes from this one."


      Not to mention ER:

      "Get the difibulator! STAT!" ...60 seconds later... Windows starup wav...

      "Forget it. He's gone."

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  162. prior art, the electric chair by osatheist · · Score: 1

    didn't ol' sparky take advantage of the fact that the human body is conductive and provides some resistance???

    1. Re:prior art, the electric chair by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine an MS operating system in charge of regulating the voltage through your body? (shudder)

      Shake hands with somebody and get a worm or virus of a different sort!

      There's some great material for a hokey SciFi channel midnight movie there...

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  163. Would anybody really want this? by spikev · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are two reasons I can think of that this sort of system wouldn't be ideal: 1) I don't want to let MS run electricity through my body and 2) it would be far easier to sync all my devices with a wireless network, even if I had to do something to activate the syncing. Besides, if this patent is in the clear, it will likely be expired before anything significant has been done with it.

  164. CANCER??? by enigmals1 · · Score: 0

    I'm somewhat scepticle about the whole powerlines cause cancer thing... but if that's true, what will running the power right through us do?

    We'll see...I'd like to see the long term affect of running higher powered devices thorugh the body. And would we create a person magnetic field? You think static is bad in the winter now?!!... ;)

  165. prior art by atleast 2 years - /. counts right? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I call prior art on myself (should be in some old slashdot posts). One dumb-terminal touch-screen palm-pilot sized device to control all the other devices you have in your pockets eg mobile, mp3 player, laptop (in brief case) etc. Except i thought it would be better wireless so it could interface with say a public computer in an airport to give you a map and tell you were your gate is. How will you control something in your pocket if it doesnt have skin contact? (apart from throwing out all your clothes and buying foil lined fabric)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  166. Misconceptions about patents by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
    My gut says that many of MS's claims are voided by prior art

    Individual claims on a patent merely comprise the patent, it is the entire patent which is voided (or not) by prior art. In fact, in many patents some of the claims directly cite prior art, hence the ability to patent an improvement to an existing device or method.

    Exempla Gratis:
    #1 - Patent for The Thingmeister
    Claim A - it has feet
    Claim B - it can talk
    Claim C - it hates your cat

    #2 - Patent for The Rotoscoping Thingmeister
    Claim A - it has feet
    Claim B - it can talk
    Claim C - it hates your cat
    Claim D - it hates your dog
    Claim E - it has a rotoscope!

    #2 must still meet the requirements of being nonobvious and unique, but it can include the identical claims of #1 provided that it elaborates upon the previous thing in such a way as to be considered new and different.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Misconceptions about patents by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 1

      True -- which is why I said that I felt many of MS's CLAIMS are voided by prior art.

      They will not throw out an entire patent based on a claim -- but AFAIK the claims do still need to be unique (as they relate to their "comprised of" statements). Is this incorrect?

      Thanks for the clarification.

    2. Re:Misconceptions about patents by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
      They will not throw out an entire patent based on a claim -- but AFAIK the claims do still need to be unique (as they relate to their "comprised of" statements). Is this incorrect?

      No, claims themselves do not need to be unique, the overall patented item must be unique.

      If I invent a new kind of lawnmower, one of my claims might be "1) A device for cutting grass using rotating blades."
      This is not unique, and may even be the identical wording of a claim from a previously patented lawnmower design. So prior art exists for this claim, but perhaps my next claim is "2) A device capable of autonomous navigation which can sense and react to changes in the environment."
      Claim (2) may also be identical to a claim for a previously patented device, however, now with (1) and (2) together I have a unique item, even though the claims which comprise the patent are not unique. (We're assuming I'm the first person to patent an autonomous lawnmower.) Every claim in your patent could be found in prior art, but claims are not voided, it is only the sum of the claims that can be voided. So assuming you're the first one to put all those previously thought-of ideas together into one device, you can still patent it. Aha, I thought of a great example - the swiss army knife. Every damn thing on it is old hat, but cram it all into a folding knife and it's a new and unique thing.

      This is not to say that just adding "Claim N+1: and a pony!" to any patent makes your new item patentable, it must be sufficiently demonstrated that your additional claim(s) create a unique or significant improvement over the previous patent. In the case of this M$ patent, because their claims specifically cite prior art, you can bet your last dollar that they did their homework to make sure that all their new claims go above and beyond what was already patented.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    3. Re:Misconceptions about patents by Mr.+Sane · · Score: 1

      Except that I do not think your claim would be complete without adding "comprising", "wherein", or "and" on the end.

      As it stands I do not think the claim:
      "1) A device for cutting grass using rotating blades." would be accepted

      However the claim:
      "1) A device for cutting grass using rotating blades, comprising
      a) A method of allowing the blades to hover above the grass using a magnetic force.
      b) ...."

      might be accepted...

  167. Human Genome by count_zero011 · · Score: 1

    Just imagine the lawsuits from companies who've patented parts of the human genome...

  168. Don't dismiss intuition so quickly! by bollow+(a)+NoLockIn · · Score: 1
    Divlje Jagode wrote: Followed any of the links? ...the keywords being amazing and megabits. Please, in the future, keep your gut feelings to yourself.

    If something is counter-intuitive, i.e. countrary to the gut feelings of someone with reasonably good general knowledge in the relevant fields of science, it is important to question such numbers.

    In this case, while the linked-to slashdot text claims (as you quote) "amazing 10 megabits per second", the statement in the actual article is significantly weaker: "The companies have confirmed in an experiment that data can be transmitted at 10 megabits per second".

    Hence this "10 megabits per second" is under laboratory conditions (without the kind of electromagnetic noise that will necessarily be there if you're close to other people using a "body bus").

    Also, that article talks about a single, unidirectional data transmission, not about a bus. I suspect the experiment may have been about the case of the sender and receiver being in shoes. That case is much easier to get to work with good bandwidth, because you'll actually have a closed electric circuit, with the floor functioning as an additional conductor.

    If your gut feelings are different from mine, fine. That'd be a reason to dig up actual research data. But I'm going to disregard your request to keep my gut feelings to myself :-)

    --
    Under construction: swpat politics overview article
  169. Microsoft patents the Pacemaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See claim #28 on Microsoft's newest patent.
    Now they can go out and sue all those companies
    that make pacemakers and maybe get SCO to sue all
    the people walking around with a pacemaker.

  170. Arrrggh Billy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we go from getting screwed up the bum - no grease! to getting screwed all over - still no grease.

  171. Guerilla Anti-Patent Action by smclean · · Score: 1
    What if we created a foundation which did nothing but apply for patents which were incredibly obvious like this. Two scenarios:

    If our patents were declined because of prior art, or because they are too obvious (which they probably would be since we aren't Microsoft), then we would be able to use the fact that this patent was declined to fight any patent awarded in the same field later.

    If our patents were accepted, we would just do whatever it takes to make sure that royalties are never ever ever demanded on the 'patented' technology.

    Anyone know why we (the OSS/Free Software people) haven't done this already? How much does a patent application cost?

    Sean

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  172. Re:Skin Effect well known & established prior by IsaacW · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it only really manifests itself at high frequencies... perhaps Microsoft's innovation here is that they have gotten it to work for low-bit-rate data ;-)

  173. consiracy patrol by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    its all a conspiracy.

    Microsoft are trying to get people with big hair (like myself) to be antenni, so they can steal all information passed arounnd your body. i new there was a conspiracy in it somewhere, you just have to think about it...

    (note to self: even though this post is sarcastic, mods usually have no sense of humor)

  174. Seen it before, in 1996. by CarlPatten · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://www.businessweek.com/1996/26/b348112.htm

    SOLE MATES. At MIT's Media Lab, where corporate sponsors fund prototypes of new digital technologies, computers are appearing in wildly unlikely places. As part of a project called Things That Think, researchers have embedded a computer in a Nike Inc. sneaker. Using a piezoelectric polymer to generate power from foot movement, a computer in the heel might act as a sort of personal secretary. When two people shake hands, for instance, the skin-to-skin contact would be detected by sensors in each person's shoe. That would trigger an exchange of information--the computers could perhaps swap electronic business cards and check calendars for a future meeting date. Modified eyeglasses and wristwatches might display the data.
    1. Re:Seen it before, in 1996. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Careful - MS funds some MIT research. Did you check to see if this project was MS funded?

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    2. Re:Seen it before, in 1996. by Goglu · · Score: 1

      Just imagine the look of your agenda after taking the metro at rush hour!

  175. Time to patent "stupid patents" by Gnulix · · Score: 1

    I'll make out like a bandit!

  176. Great... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    Everytime I get a static shock from touching a door handle I'll have to pay a royalty to friggin' Bill Gates.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  177. US government is out of control by kippa · · Score: 1

    We're in some seriously deep fucking doo-doo if this is the kind of blanket freedom a corporation gets while individual liberties are trampled daily.

    The revolution will not be patented.

  178. This might be invalidated by prior art by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    This is a physical device and if there is no prior art then I think this is a very valid patent.

    IMHO there is:

    IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3&4, 1996 - MIT Media Lab
    ACM Newsletter, April 2000
    Microsoft US Patent 6,754,472 - Filed: April 27, 2000
    2L8? ;-/
    1. Re:This might be invalidated by prior art by TacoBellGrande · · Score: 1

      From what I understand of patent law and what I read, that isn't really prior art. Patents (in the US, at least) are issued to the first to "reduce to practice". That article seemed far too "hand-wavy" to be contrued as a reduction to practice. Even if the article did disclose exactly how they did it, if Microsoft came up with a different method it would be patentable. After all, its the mechanism, not the concept, that is patentable. Furthermore, even if they had a system that worked the same as Microsoft, it probably still wouldn't invalidate the patent because prior art must be "available to the public". Finally, in the US, unlike most other countries, its not the filing date, but the invention date that counts. If Microsoft can prove they invented the same technology before IBM published the paper, I think they're still eligible for the patent. I agree that a lot of patents issued today are stupid, but this does not seem like one of them.

  179. In religious news... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft is being sued by God, holder of patent #0 ("Universe, including all living and non-living things, culminating in independently operating human beings") for infringement. God claims that "at minimum, humans already conduct electrical signals via their skin, as can be evidenced by measures of electrodermal activity". God's reference to the use of scientific data represents a departure from His traditional stance. His justification for this was given as "Hey, I created everything, so I created science, right? Besides, this Gates guy is really starting to piss Me off."

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  180. Whitman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And both Bradbury and Microsoft are thus haunted by Walt Whitman, who is the original source of the phrase "I Sing the Body Electric." p?Not that I expect slashdotter's to know such things.

    1. Re:Whitman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whitman fucked little boys and gloated in his poetry about these little excursions into prepubescent territory. Thus, there is no denying his contributions to Brooklyn culture. Truly an American icon.

  181. Dejavu. by FeebleX · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like what I wrote about in my thesis (the mobile memex) in 2003.

    I talked about functional overlap between personal information devices in the Body Area Network. Sharing of Sensors and Actuators in a JXTA based P2P network using dermal conductivity. Hell I even called this system "Bodybus" because of the lack of a better name on the comparison on page 29...

    http://www.ubiq.org/downloads/m3x_thesis.pdf

  182. The end is near. by njcoder · · Score: 1
    Wearable devices my ass! It's obvious that a version of the nanotechnology used to keep Dick Clark alive for 200 years has now been injected into Bill Gates. Using the human skin as a bus is not the point. The evil nanomachines are preparing for the day when they enslave us all and use US as the information super highway.

    We never should have used gold in electronics, it's a prissy little element.

  183. Dear God, by 2names · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Please don't let the parent of this post breed and infect our gene pool with his ignorance and stupidity.

    Amen.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  184. Those examiners don't even know spelling. by Serious+Simon · · Score: 1

    From the abstract of the patent:
    "One or more devise to be powered,"

  185. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a Microsoft OS running on the devices, the Blue Screen of Death suddenly becomes a serious issue.

  186. electric baby chicken peepers, anyone? by mojotoad · · Score: 1
    As for conductivity, what about those little novelty baby chicks with two electrodes on the bottom -- when you cup it in your hand, the electrodes contact your skin and the chick starts going peep-peep-peep.

    Everyone that's ever played with one of those probably quickly found out that you could link hands with several people, with only the two people on the end of the chain each touching a peeper electrode, to get the same effect.

    Microsoft patents Ohm's Law?

    Matt

  187. Old stuff by frambris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, I heard of BAN (Body Area Networks) years ago! The US patent office seems to be lame retards that doesn't check whether someone has done this before. I can't recollect who did the experiments but read an article about 5 years ago of a computer worn in the shoes drawing power from movement (and maybe foul air =) ). When people shaking hands their computers swapped electronic businesscards. So after a day of shaking hands on meetings, fairs etc you could get a list of whom they were and everything.

    How the heck can you get a patent on something that is already out there?

    Why don't we file a patent for "sending information through variations in airpressure" (also knows as talking)?

  188. Watch a porn cd and... by the_archivist · · Score: 0

    the drm switches your dick off

    --
    while(karma less_than enough_karma){karma++}
  189. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Micro$oft has finally found a way to licenses breathering.

    Honestly, who in there right mind would ever plug themselves into a Micro$oft product? Can you say reboot feedback....OUCH!!!

  190. Re:oh here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really DON'T like the idea of Bill Gates holding any sort of weird patent concerning the skin on my labia or breasts!

  191. Re:Does this work yes but by the_archivist · · Score: 0

    Will require 2 second fart into fart powered generator to access hard drive

    --
    while(karma less_than enough_karma){karma++}
  192. body bus and personal area networks by maurert · · Score: 1

    I hope they use good encryption, otherwise we'll all have to wear wet suits to avoid "hackers" in a crowd.

  193. Silence of the Lambs by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has been awarded a patent for using human skin as a power conduit and data bus.

    "It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again." ---Buffalo Bill Gates

  194. Not so bad... by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

    Just as long as they don't patent the "Body Buzz" I'll let this one slide. /me has another.

  195. Soul Train by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    ... is still in development

  196. Prior Art... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Human Nervous System?

  197. IBM had this years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall seeing a demonstration by IBM where a guy was using the body as a conduit to transmit data from one person to the other.

    Is that the same? Anyone know where the demo is?

  198. Dead body or alive?? by AIXmaster · · Score: 1

    Did they ( M$ ) use live or dead bodies ???

    Did they steal some bodies from the morgue
    and conducted experiments??? That's sick!!!
    If so, how decomposed does the body can be
    to be useful ???

    --
    DisClaimer: My comments do not reflect nor represent anyone else nor my current employer's views or attitudes.
  199. Ooh, I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're trying to fool me into reading the article, huh?

    Well, well, if it's not the dirty ol' trick of telling something is in the article to fool one into having to read it to check...

    Didn't work this time, pal, better luck next time!

  200. IBM had this in print 10+ years ago by tweedlebait · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't remeber whether it was PopSci, SciAm or BYTE
    but 10-15 yrs ago I remember an article about ibm
    researchers doing business card and phone number
    info between people using a handshake, or
    having several peopole's devices 'synched' at once
    using a banister / handrail.

    Knowing IBM i'm pretty sure they paid a visit
    to the patent office.

    --
    Firefox & /. ? Use this often:
  201. Prior use? by homeobocks · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is going to be suing Texas for their electric chairs!

    --
    MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING
  202. It was revealed today ... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    that Micro$oft performed much of their pre-patent
    testing at Abu Ghraib prison, using Saddam's
    test equipment and some Iraqi "volunteers" ...

  203. Prior art ... Re:This might be valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone said it's called "the nervous system"

  204. Sorry: litigated rather than 'sued' by Sebby · · Score: 1
    should've said 'litigated' rather than 'sued' since you'd be on the prosecution side of things.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  205. Sort of brings new meaning to... by barfy · · Score: 1

    The Blue Screen Of Death...

    (brought to you by the Microsoft the makers of Personal Area Netwoks, and Pfizer the maker of Viagra. They both ask "Where in the hell do you want to go today..."

  206. Easy answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What about DoCoMo's research in this area?

    Umm, research does not equal patent.

    Next question?

    1. Re:Easy answer... by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      research != patent, true but research ~= prior art, which follows patent requires !priorart.

  207. Sniffer for your PAN? by tekn0lust · · Score: 1

    What will we use to sniff packets on the PAN?

  208. I don't know about anyone else, but... by psykotedy · · Score: 1

    ...I don't want to involuntarily wet myself when my Windows CE palmtop gives a blue screen.

  209. Yet again, /. fails to RTFP by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    Yes, body PANs have been done before. The invention claimed here is a PAN that happens to also transmit power through the skin, and not only that, but one where the target device communicates its power requirements to the host device through the skin (pretty cool, actually) such that the host can modulate a different signal specific to that device.

    I haven't seen any prior art combining these elements, nor do they seem particularly obvious to me (at least, when I read it, I said "cool", which is my usual metric for would someone skilled in the art, such as myself, have anticipated the invention based on what was known at the time).

    There's nothing at all wrong, illegitimate, or invalid about patenting combinations of previously known technologies. Heck, *all* inventions are combinations of previously known technologies.

  210. What Microsoft can do... by norminator · · Score: 1
    If Microsoft can really get data and power running through the human body, it could really usher in a new age of computing.
    You mean, if Microsoft can let someone else do the research, then claim the technology as their own, then muff up their implementation and get mad at anyone else that tries to do their own implemenation...

    Oh yeah, their already half way through that process
  211. Microsoft Skindows??? by blandnet · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's corny and will probably be moderated into oblivion, but oh well.

  212. FU M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates, if I decide to let signals from a device on my body go through my body to get to another device on my body, I sure as h___ ain't interested in paying you royalties on it! Go to h___!

  213. Bullshit by vettemph · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Patents the idea of using a conductive stuff as a way to conduct stuff. I don't understand what is new about this.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    1. Re:Bullshit by sirTifiable · · Score: 1

      I don't get this...why do all /. dotters give a shit about this? Let them patent away...and...what exactly? They think they own it...yeah right, lets see China pay up, or Thailand, Germany, France etc etc these are non stories

  214. What about a "Times New Roman"? by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 0

    Does this work just as well?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:What about a "Times New Roman"? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft hold copyright on Arial.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  215. same ol' same ol' by sirTifiable · · Score: 1

    Why does everyone go beserk because Microsoft patented this or that? Whos gives a shit? Sure, I am in Europe and the laws are different; but the only people worrying should be Microsft shareholders. THAT is a watse of money.

  216. Needs to be challenged-lots of prior art by ironring · · Score: 1
    Sending Signals Through the Skin: Applications and Advantages 1996

    Intrabody Signalling 1995

    Can touch this 1996

    What someone needs to do is set up a site where people can help fight this crap by supplying references to prior art for bogus patents.

  217. Prior Art? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how trackpads work?

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  218. wishful thinking by dekeji · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt you are going to get more power transmitted through the human body using conduction than you are going to get via RF or via body-powered batteries or motion powered generators.

    Keep in mind that you need two conductors to make the circuit. Something like an earring is going to have two electrodes very close to each other very far from the power source, which is like having two high resistance wires with lots of low resistance wires between them.

    I think they never tried this. Furthermore, the patent does seem to claim data transmission by itself, and that clearly has lots of prior art.

  219. Blue skin...? by EuroChild · · Score: 1

    Blue skin of death?

    ...ahem. Sorry.

    --
    Does this make my brain look big?
  220. Give 'em the patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patent applies to devices that use single point for IO. Hmmm... Like a heart monitor, or pace maker. They really messed up, because if you want to interact with a device, you'll need more than one IO. So if you raise your blood pressure, does that mean quick go to the next message in your email goggles???

  221. what about ibm prior art? by geraint-nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    several years ago ibm showed(patented?) a system where suits at a conference could exchange electronic business cards by touching hands :-)

  222. Mandatory Star Trek TNG plug by Tirs · · Score: 1

    Have you ever heard of... Microsoft Borg?

    --
    Strength, balance, courage and reason. If you know what's this about, contact me!
  223. Give us a demo by HonkyLips · · Score: 1

    I volunteer to demonstrate this new technology by shoving a taser up Bill Gate's arse.

    --
    Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
  224. Already done by MIT almost ten years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have (at home, unfortunately or I could give a hard refrence) a copy of the IBM Systems Journal from about 1997, which was a focus on the MIT Media Lab (remember Nicholas Negroponte?)

    In that issue, this very idea was the focal point of an entire article, and it showed pictures of working prototypes, including the exhange of electronic "busines cards" via the bioelectic fields of two people shaking hands.

    I find it very hard to believe that neither of MIT or IBM have not already patented this, and if they haven't, there is definite, published even, prior art.

    Did the Patent office not even bother doing a literature search?

  225. IBM did this back in 1996 or earlier by Durandel1020 · · Score: 2, Informative

    IBM has done this sort of research many years ago. Knowing how IBM is on the ball with patent law, I doubt they didnt patent this before.

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/pan/pan.html

    see for yourself, this type of thing is old hat.

  226. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. Now Billy can shove it up his ...

  227. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seriously need a memory upgrade...

    No really! My hardware is cutting edge tech from 1976!

  228. Bad bad Microsoft by aimew · · Score: 0

    When will they stop stealing from thieves? This is like Apple/Microsoft of old over the Xerox software!

    Next thing you know they'll take this SUPERSET of the other technologies and make it user friendly (just to trick people) and then outsell the competition.

    The bastards!

    At least we'll be able to rage against them even more now! ... and now there will be a company with some resources behind it to finally get that technology to the marketplace - those bastards! IBM and those other companies should have decades to sit on this, after all they thought of it first! So what if they aren't doing anything with it.

    Microsoft should just close shop and go away; how dare they try and make things work? They never get it perfect anyway. They should just stop trying so we can get back to a garage company economy.

    --
    Keeper of the terrible karma ---
  229. Only H.U.M.A.N. by Jump · · Score: 1

    H.U.M.A.N. (host unit for multimedia advanced network) - a multimedia network platform designed to explore real world. Devices included: speaker system ('Mouth'), dual-mic ('Ears' - sometimes not working), dual-cam ('Eyes' - always on), rechargable battery ('stomach'), central processing unit ('brain', only in some units available), multiple sensors, build-in transport system (compatible with all public transport systems), ... No with additional speaker system to annoy environment! Invovate!

  230. Which part of Stuff that Matters you don't get? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Honestly, first time I hear aboyt this and is generating and interesting thread, so what is your point?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  231. You think that's bad... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    think about the embarassment of leaving your "dongle" at home.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  232. M$ Powerd Computer by twitter · · Score: 0
    An AC without a sense of humor asks:

    What the hell is an "M$ powered computer"?

    It's a computer that makes the operator run around in circles, pull their hair and curse like most of the AC fanboys that follow me around. Co-incidence? I think not.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:M$ Powerd Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD,

  233. dep't of redundancy dep't by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Responding to a patent story with prior art, in this post's parent, is moderated as "redundant". Slashdot metamoderation needs a new option, beyond "Un/Fair": "Funny". Oh, could it be an M$ partisan taking issue with my accurate assessment of the M$/Fed monopoly collusion? That's more like "+1: Redundant".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  234. Referenced in the patent by qtp · · Score: 1

    "Personal Area Networks: Near-field intrabody communication"; IBM Systems Journal, vol. 35, No. 3&4, 1996 --MIT Media Lab, 11 pages.

    This article was mentioned as a reference in the patent, and is included as prior art. I guess that means that what has been already implemented at the Media Lab is excluded from the Microsoft patent.

    It seems that the patent is for an actual implementation of this idea, and thus would allow you to invent your own without violating, as long as you are not using Microsoft's tech in your creation. In other words (shock, horror) it's a good patent that references previous work.

    --
    Read, L
  235. RTFP... They are not stealing anything. by qtp · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is aware of that work and even mentions an article from the "IBM Systems Journal, volume 35, nos 3 & 4" about the work at the Media Lab.

    This patent is only for Microsoft's implementation. As much as I like to bash McSoftware and their business practices, there's nothing wrong with this patent. It references a lot of prior art, and points other developers to information that might allow them to create thier own Personal Area Network without stepping on Microsofts IP.

    I still think they're greedy pigs, but apparently they do have people who are ethical and can "play nice" (thx to Lyndsay, Bill, and Steve for not trying to "Sarnoff" or "Von Neuman" this one.)

    --
    Read, L
  236. Hidden Year in Slashdot Timestamps by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    the sited article is dated Sunday October 06, @20:37. .. October 6 of what year? This could make the difference between a random reference and verified prior art. (I'm not kidding here... Slashdot posts might classify as prior art in some patent fights).

    The very first thing in Your Slashdot Homepage Preferences is Date/Time Format with no less than 15 options which include a year. And just for the record, the article in question was posted on 2002-10-07.

    In this case, it looks like this one was 2002 (the other option is an unlikely 1996), which is 2 years after MS filed their patent. I'm lazy.. I hate having to use cal(1) to figure this out.

    From what I can tell, you seem to be not nearly lazy enough. Just choose the format you like and be done with it. Unfortunately, there is no format equivalent to ISO-8601 compliant date/time string or date -u '+%Y-%m-%d %A %H:%M:%S %Z' which I personally would prefer for Slashdot posts.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  237. Such a Religion Already Exists by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking of starting the "FOSSie" Religion
    In the same way that nothing from a pig goes into a Jewish body, nothing with a Microsoft logo goes into or onto mine...

    There already is such a religion, The Church of Emacs, which--according to Saint IGNUcius (a.k.a. Richard Stallman or "RMS")--I am proud to be a saint of. It has little to do with Microsoft per se, but rather all proprietary software not being kosher:

    "Sainthood in the Church of Emacs requires living a life of purity--but in the Church of Emacs, this does not require celibacy [...]. Being holy in our church means installing a wholly free operating system--GNU/Linux is a good choice--and not putting any non-free software on your computer."

    To join the Church of Emacs, you need only say the Confession of the Faith three times:

    There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels.

    It is actually one of the smartest religions I have ever heard of.

    It'd bring a whole new meaning to having "worms"...

    Now, this I find insulting.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."