Slashdot Mirror


Building A Homebrew Robotic Lawnmower?

mmonkey writes "With the seemingly small amount of summer we get here in the UK, the last thing I want to be doing on a sunny day is mow the lawn. So I started thinking "surely a light-ish lawnmower could 'gain' a couple of motors, and suddenly be computer-controlled?". Then I started thinking about stuff like obstacle avoidance, optimum path planning, guidance system, how to get pretty-looking stripes, and I realised that it's actually a potentially complex (read: fun) thing to do. So, have any Slashdotters done this before? Did you modify an existing lawnmower or build a whole new one from scratch? What motors work best? For that matter, what type of mower works best? I know you can already get these, but that detracts from both my geek-drive and my wallet, both of which I'd prefer to keep as full as possible."

486 comments

  1. Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd make sure its plenty safe. I'm not concerned about you, but picture a mis-programmed robotic lawnmower chasing the neighbors dog, or worse, trying to run over a child... :|

    1. Re:Uhhhh by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Funny


      Yeah, I imagine it could be an even deadlier version of Vroomba.

    2. Re:Uhhhh by Eiki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The safe way to do it is to have the thing run with very low power, and just nibble at the lawn, but do it all day. The big gas engine on the top of your push mower is really for the convenience of the operator, so that he can mow tall grass without stalling the thing or slowing down.

      But if you mowed the grass yourself, one time, and then let loose your robot to simply maintain the height with a low power electric motor and some relatively safe blades, etc.... After all, it can stay out there all damn day!

    3. Re:Uhhhh by bugmenot · · Score: 0

      Remember the three laws from Asimov's: Thou shall not kill yourself Thou shall not kill your master Thou shall not kill your master's friends This appliance should be safe if they follow these three simple rules.

      --
      This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
    4. Re:Uhhhh by dangerz · · Score: 1

      Ya, but would you/the neighbors be able to tolerate the noise nonstop?

      --
      The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
      - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Uhhhh by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Suppose you made a grill for the bottom of the mower deck similar to that which covers the blades of an electric razor. This would allow the blades of grass to reach the rotating blades while keeping fingers and toes safe. Perhaps finding one of those big furnace registers like you see in old houses would be the way to go.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    6. Re:Uhhhh by Penguinshit · · Score: 4, Informative


      You have that kind of backwards (and wrong). The Asimovian rules are:

      1. A robot must never harm a human being

      2. A robot must follow a human being's orders, unless that conflicts with Rule #1

      3. A robot must preserve itself, unless that conflicts with either Rule #2 or Rule #1.

    7. Re:Uhhhh by sploxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, I would implement the following:

      1. A _safe_ mowing method as you describe
      2. The position measurement could be done with (ultra)sonic sensors and a transmitter on the mower. Doesn't work if you have to change garden often.
      3. A power and communication cable. Can be cheap because of low power requirements because of 1.
      4. A tower from where the cable goes to the mower and a mechanism to ensure that the cable doesn't get in the way.

      Of course there is no obstacle avoidance etc., but I would start such a project in a modest size, not with all the 1000 features which _could_ be implemented!

      As I'm doing such things also (Homemade microcontroller applications are everywhere in my home), I would say that it is far better to have a little thing working than big plans for a big thing but get nothing implemented.

    8. Re:Uhhhh by cratermoon · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot:

      0. A robot must never harm humanity.

      1. (revised) A robot must never harm a human being unless that conflicts with the zeroth law.

    9. Re:Uhhhh by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Suppose you made a grill for the bottom of the mower deck similar to that which covers the blades of an electric razor.

      I suspect that if this worked, lawnmower manufacturers would have already done it for liability reasons. One thing about a grill is that it would probably clog for any non-trivial amount of wet grass.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    10. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So where does never harming an OCP officer come into that?

    11. Re:Uhhhh by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Funny


      only after he's been fired.

      Kinda brings a whole new meaning to the term "terminated"...

    12. Re:Uhhhh by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      one of the things I always wondered about is why couldn't this be done over RF, i know you couldn't do it with timing like you'd expect but you could easily do it by measuring the power your recieving which is relativly easy to do, a couple resistors and caps+ a voltmeter and boom you have a simple way to measure the distance and with 100mw it'd be enough to go to the end of your yard, and you could place 3 small beacons (assuming your yard isn't hilly) in reference locations then make a map of the yard using some small device to measure the distance and then program in the nodes of map, use something like a bsp splitting alg and divide the area up into sections to mow

    13. Re:Uhhhh by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1
      Creating a robotic lawnmower is just asking for trouble. Even with the best intentions, I would worry that a homebrew design would harm the public.

      Frankly, it is the manufacturers of medical devices that I think would be most capable of designing such a product.

      Sure, engineers in the medical field may not pick the best motor, or they may not have the flashiest or most configurable robot, but it would more than likely stop its blades from spinning before even coming close to making contact with a dog's paw or an inquisitive child's hand.

      If he ever wanted to, I think Dean Kamen's DEKA would make an excellent robot mower.

    14. Re:Uhhhh by JVert · · Score: 1

      Consider 5 times quieter then an electric weedwacker.

    15. Re:Uhhhh by Altizar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it was
      1. A robot must never harm a human being, or through inaction allow a human being to come to harm.

      The second part of that law might seem unimportant but it is just as important as the first.
      Without the rest of the first law a robot could cause a human to die by 'accident'

    16. Re:Uhhhh by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      As i remember, that rule was never actually stated, but it is kind of implied, as one robot discovered.

      BTW, +1 Funny? Sounds like drunken moderation day to me.

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    17. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The safe way to do it is to have the thing run with very low power, and just nibble at the lawn, but do it all day"

      Why not get a sheep. They nibble the lawn, and I hear some people find *alternate* uses for them as well.

    18. Re:Uhhhh by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Somehow these laws didn't make it in smart bombs.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    19. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The safe way to do it is to have the thing run with very low power, and just nibble at the lawn, but do it all day.
      It's called a sheep. And given that this is slashdot , full of geeks with no girlfriends, the sheep would probably be put to alternative uses as well.

    20. Re:Uhhhh by mjtg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know why this was mod-ed funny - Asimov added the Zeroth Law (and revised the First) in his later Robot novels (as he merged the series into the Foundation saga).

    21. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      "But I had a ... friend twenty thousand years ago. Another robot. Not like myself. He could not be mistaken for a human being, but it was he who had the mental powers and it was through him that I gained mine."

      "It seemed to him that there should be a still more general rule than any of the Three Laws. He called it the Zeroth Law, since zero comes before one. It is:"

      "'Zero. A robot may not injure humanity or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.'"

      "'Then the First Law must read:'"

      "'One. A robot may not ingure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm, except where that would conflict with the Zeroth Law.'"

      "And the other laws must be similarly modified..."

      from Predlude to Foundation by Issac Asimov (heh in case you couldn't guess)

    22. Re:Uhhhh by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Actually it was in prelude to foundation. Good book and interesting twist I must say. I didn't know it going in so it was pretty shocking.

      --Joey

    23. Re:Uhhhh by diersing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or better yet, when a neighbor gets tired of the noise (even if not all that loud, a low constant noise can grate on the nerves) and kicks it in the pool or swipes it. Make sure to check eBay for a listing of a homemade mowing robot (manual, not included)

    24. Re:Uhhhh by EvanED · · Score: 1

      One thing I would do is add a remote kill switch, and then keep an eye on it while it is running. That way if it gets into trouble, you can stop it quickly.

    25. Re:Uhhhh by magefile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also from "The Robots of Dawn". Which is related to the Foundation series, in a way. Very pre-historic, from the Foundation's point of view, but Dr. Hans Fastolfe was the guy who originally came up with the idea (although he couldn't implement it) of psychohistory. At Giskard's suggestion. That was why he was so interested in robots; he wondered if the 3 laws had equivalents in humans.

    26. Re:Uhhhh by platypibri · · Score: 1

      I hought is was in "Robots and Empire" where Daniel and Giskard theorized the Zeroth law and while Danieel could accept it and function, Giskard could not and "died".

      --
      Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    27. Re:Uhhhh by platypibri · · Score: 1

      I apologize, I thought I was hitting the preveiw button. Or I am Indian and want your job. I forget which.

      --
      Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    28. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR you could do the Simple thing. Take a self propelled lawnmower and plant a pole in the center of the lawn. Then attach a chain to the pole thn the chain to the side of the lawnmower. Start the lawnmower and let it go. just make sure the circle it will create is smaller than any fences or you will have problems. Aslo make sure that it rotates in such a way that the grass is discharged Away from the center of the circle (or try to the center then its all collected for you ) ..all your left with is the corners.

    29. Re:Uhhhh by XryanX · · Score: 1

      "After all, it can stay out there all damn day!"

      What about battery lifespan? He might have better luck with a smaller gas engine. Perhaps you could pull it from a weedwhacker or something of the sort.

    30. Re:Uhhhh by msheppard · · Score: 0

      I've designed it... I could build it today... but having though about it (like you are now), it really does boil down to: "Won't somebody think of the children!?"

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    31. Re:Uhhhh by tonyr60 · · Score: 3, Funny

      " one of the things I always wondered about is why couldn't this be done over RF"

      Well it could be done WITH RF. A wide angle microwave beam 1cm high and about 3 cm above the ground would do it. Oh and about 200 Kwatts.

      Or overboost one of those circulating surveyors lasers, again about 3 cm over the ground. That would need less power, 200 watts should keep the grass down.

    32. Re:Uhhhh by FirstEdition · · Score: 1

      yes, and one of his short stories called "little lost robot" explores this subtle distinction.

    33. Re:Uhhhh by DanielJosphXhan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I say screw safety. If you want this thing to be a real geekmowbile, you need to go big and flashy. Real big, and reeeeal flashy.

      1) Buy an old ride-on lawnmower, and patch the steering system into the onboard waterproof laptop. Running, of course, your favorite flavour of Linux.

      2) Mount a satelite dish on top to communicate with "home base".

      3) Install wireless broadcasting points underground for the unit to use in locating safe "pathways". Also, rig some sort of rudimentary vision system (preferably a VHS camcorder also patched into your laptop) to avoid stray objects. Make sure this vision system is mounted on an all-point swivel base, so you can simultaneously surviel your neighbors.

      4) Program your Linux system with a speech synthesizer, and patch that into onboard speakers. Again, preferably some sort of stone-age boombox.

      5) Label your craft "NCC-1701", and set it free to roam your lawn.

      6) (optional) If you're concerned about the security of this craft, I suggest you install an "attack first and ask questions later" defense system commonly known as a "goose".

      --
      [ think ]
    34. Re:Uhhhh by Couchman · · Score: 1

      uhhh .. u got those backwards .. its "imagine its chasing the neighbors child ... or worse .. the neighbors dog."

    35. Re:Uhhhh by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, it was in both. And there was also a theorization of it by Dr. Calvin in I, Robot...I think it was the last one, "The Machines," where the world-controlling computers are found to have been trashing certain humans' careers because they were destabalizing the social order. However, it was the Robots and Empire one that was the real story...where the robots (by the way, it was R. Giskard Reventlov who did it, first acted on it, and had his brain fried. And R. Daneel Olivaw helped him figure it out.) basically figured out that the first law conflicted with itself inherently, and came up with something to fix it. In Prelude to Foundation R. Daneel comes back as the political advisor behind the Empire, having over thousands of years come to grips with the zeroth law...but to me it was just caught up in that ridiculous "R-Daneel Olivaw shows up in the Foundation series, only 234234563 years after we last say his shiny metal ass. Wow...this really ties all of Asimov's work together" thing. I was pissed off about Prelude. And don't even get me started on Forward the Foundation.

      Anyway, all that aside, who are the ignorant fucks who modded the first post about the zeroth law all the way to +5 Funny? What a bunch of jackasses.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    36. Re:Uhhhh by platypibri · · Score: 1
      Let's not be too hard on Mr. Asimov. He saw a way to tie The Robot, Empire, Foundation and even Nemesis story into one neat bundle before he died, and decided to go for it. Yeah, it has it's rough spots, but making nearly your whole career into one massive feat is... unparalled.

      Now had he tried to tie in the Luck Starr novels....

      --
      Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    37. Re:Uhhhh by jellybear · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought you meant a kill switch as in: "Set your mowers to kill."

    38. Re:Uhhhh by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      First of all, that's Dr. Asimov.

      Second of all, I maintain that he was just going senile. Because Prelude sucked.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    39. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solar power?

    40. Re:Uhhhh by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Ack.. right you are. Thanks for the catch. I knew I was missing something, but couldn't put my finger on it (and didn't have my copy of I, Robot handy, where The Three Laws are printed inside the cover).

      Of course, I could have been talking about the modified Nestor units from Little Lost Robot...

    41. Re:Uhhhh by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Oh my Christ.. I had forgotten about Lucky Starr... Probably on purpose.

    42. Re:Uhhhh by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      i was talking about position guidence not the cutting, that would be kickass to cut your grass with a microwave though i don't think it'd be any safer on peoples ankles like that

    43. Re:Uhhhh by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1
      1. A robot must never harm a human being

      Unless the robot is being stolen. A nice 15000V stun-gun security feature would sure keep those pesky teens away!

      ...and think about how cool it would be to put that bumper sticker from Jurassic Park on it - DANGER 150,000 VOLTS! It would be the ultimate in lawn care AND home security!

    44. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      0. A robot must never harm humanity.

      1. (revised) A robot must never harm a human being unless that conflicts with the zeroth law.


      Ah you've taken the zero spot. Now I will have to use the -1 spot!.

      -1. A robot must face Mecca, pray to Allah and dowload the laws before it plans to do anything!

    45. Re:Uhhhh by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ya, but would you/the neighbors be able to tolerate the noise nonstop?

      Noise?
      Don't use a sharp spinning blade.
      Scissors, tweezers, propane torch, laser beam, acid or caustic brush.

      Or program the robot to select for grass which only grows two inches high, and let it evolve the lawn. In several decades it might not be necessary to cut the grass -- although in the meantime we don't know how the robot will do the "selection".

    46. Re:Uhhhh by abandonment · · Score: 1

      lol brilliant - i love it.

      i think that safety could be done with a number of sensors in the mower.

      for example, gyroscopes for balance, if the mower changes more than a small amount of degrees (to take uneven lawns into account), the engine automatically shuts down power to the blades and engages 'brakes'.

    47. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... one reason mowers move so fast is that if you don't cleanly cute the grass blades, you will damage the grass. After all, grass is just another plant. A clean, cut edge is less likely to develop diesease than one that is ripped off or torn off.

      Ever use a push mower? Those things spin that squirrel cage pretty fast for the same reason: clean cutting of grass.

    48. Re:Uhhhh by armb · · Score: 1

      If Asimov hadn't done that, then the post wouldn't have been funny.

      --
      rant
    49. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever see the movie Frankenhooker?

    50. Re:Uhhhh by farmerj · · Score: 4, Informative
      Husqvarna already make mowers exactly like you describe and have done so for at lest the last 5 years.

      They make two types, an auto mower which has a 4 Ah battery and goes back to a recharging base when the batter is low and a solar mower which has a solar panel on top and doesn't need a recharging base.

      From the website the automower can handle a maximum area of 1500m^2 and the solar mower 1200m^2 with the solar mower working during sunlight hours and the automower working 24 hours a day.

      The boundary of where each cuts is marked by an electric loop and both have sensors to find their way around objects.

      --
      Independence? That's middle-class blasphemy. We are all dependent on one another, every soul of us on earth. G.B Shaw
    51. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that t he scissors idea is fantastic!
      Give the thing legs and a solar panel for power, 2 fingers in 1 hand & a pair of scissors in the other.
      It can walk around the garden during the day, stretching each invdividual blade of grass out and *snip*.
      With a decent sized garden, the grass could be long again at the start point by the time that it finishes - so no 'unused' time. win-win situation.

      --
      FGD 135
    52. Re:Uhhhh by misterpies · · Score: 1


      "big gas engine"? We're talking about mowing the lawns on a British, probably suburban garden, not a Texas ranch. Most British people use electric mowers - the gardens aren't big enough to make a petrol-powered version worthwhile, plus it's much less fun if you don't have to worry about accidentally running over the power cable and electrocuting yourself.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    53. Re:Uhhhh by DerWulf · · Score: 2, Insightful



      What is up with making *every* fucking thing safe for kids per default? This is really asking for trouble, it makes parents *and* kids more careless than appropriat.

      and what the hell is a child doing on a lawn that is getting mowed (by a human or otherwise) in the first place? Evolution - Stupidity 1:0

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    54. Re:Uhhhh by Wienerschnitzel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a power mower with target discrimination would be interesting.
      How about going for the easier way to 'geek up' your mower? Just make it remote controlled!
      That way, you won't have it zipping through the neighbors rosebushes or shredding their papers. At least not without your knowledge of it...
      Anybody know how to rig a mower with a remote?

    55. Re:Uhhhh by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Motorize one of the old-style push-powered lawnmowers. Quiet, and even healthier for the grass.

      You'd probably need to set up some sort of suspension and stabilizing system to keep it from tipping over, though.

    56. Re:Uhhhh by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      7) Sell plans to Black and Decker
      8) Wait for MonstaMowa to appear all around your neighbourhood
      9) Beowulf cluster them together
      10) ???
      11) Profit!

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    57. Re:Uhhhh by pmw57 · · Score: 1
      You have that kind of backwards (and wrong). The Asimovian rules are:
      1. A robot must never harm a human being
      2. A robot must follow a human being's orders, unless that conflicts with Rule #1
      3. A robot must preserve itself, unless that conflicts with either Rule #2 or Rule #1.

      THe only trouble is, as a leeding robotics scientist pointed out a week ago, is that robots just end up standing ther shivering because they're just too scared to do anything else.

      --
      Paul Wilkins

    58. Re:Uhhhh by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Interesting concept, but I think there are several problems:
      1. Because of 1/(r^2) decay of power density, the distance power equations are nonlinear and you'd need a higher dynamical range A/D converter. With sound measurement, you'd use the delay which is directly proportional to distance.

      2. You have interference patterns, reflections etc. which seriously alter the power you measure.
      With ultrasonic measurement, you'd have them too, but you could easily mask the reflection out because it is feasible to do time measurements and modulate the sound signal.

      Maybe it would be possible to do it with RF if you 'learn' the interference pattern and correct your position measurements with it.
      But what would be the advantage? I don't think that RF is simpler to implement/use than sound transmitters/receivers. If you do some signal processing, you can maybe even use some ordinary speakers and microphones.

    59. Re:Uhhhh by FlopEJoe · · Score: 2, Funny
      You forgot:

      0. (revised) A robot must never leap about in a blood haze frenzy, killing all humans and chasing Will Smith unless directed by Alex Proyas with screenplay by Jeff Vintar.

    60. Re:Uhhhh by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Funny

      The old ones without the roller *do* look a bit like Segways, don't they?

    61. Re:Uhhhh by St4rNin3 · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded funny? The Zeroth law (see Zeroth Law) was for me something that I always considered very important in the Asimov world.

    62. Re:Uhhhh by Karnatos · · Score: 1

      Just a thought - you could install one of those invisible fences used to keep your dog/cat in your yard (a collar on the pet detects the underground "fence"). If you used the collar on the mower, it could be trained to turn back when it reaches the fence edge, or even turn itself off when it crosses the fence. Just a thought... it works well on my brother-in-law's dogs.

    63. Re:Uhhhh by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dont care how it is built. all home brew mowers need a speech synthesiser and a loudspeaker that constantly says....

      "ERROR...ERROR... Must kill all humans!"

      It will keep the kids and neighbors away from your yard when it's mowing.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    64. Re:Uhhhh by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      ....if i only had mod points...

    65. Re:Uhhhh by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I thought of when I first saw a lightsaber.

      "Man, that thing would rock for mowing the lawn."

      We were selling cord wood at the time, too, and MAN that thing would rock for cutting and splitting.

      You'd want a coupla droids to do the hauling and stacking, though.

    66. Re:Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "'One. A robot may not ingure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm, except where that would conflict with the Zeroth Law.'"
      Is that robot speak for injure? Or do you have a lisp in your finjers?
    67. Re:Uhhhh by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      the main reason that i was thinking about RF was that some ultra sonic areas affect wildlife near by (i live in a heavily wooded area and have lots of animals come near my yard all the time)

    68. Re:Uhhhh by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      If you knew about lawn care, you would know that mowing wet grass is a bad idea. The blades rip the grass instead of cutting it cleanly, damaging the grass. You should mow grass when its been dry for a few days.

    69. Re:Uhhhh by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
      Actually R. Daneel first appeared in the Foundation series in Foundation and Earth which, although the last chronologically speaking, was written before Prelude which I must say I think would have been better off not being written since it added nothing new.

      Personally I thought that the Foundation series had a very neat ending but, along with Foundation's Edge and Second Foundation you did get the feeling of repetitivity...

      The First Foundation is the power in the galaxy, ...no wait the Second Foundation is the power in the Galaxy...no actually its Gaia...ummm no really its R. Daneel

      However the tie in to aliens was a very clever way to explain it.

    70. Re:Uhhhh by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      The safe way to do it is to have the thing run with very low power, and just nibble at the lawn, but do it all day. The big gas engine on the top of your push mower is really for the convenience of the operator, so that he can mow tall grass without stalling the thing or slowing down.

      So let me see. I think I saw an advertisement for a unit with two optical sensors for stereoscopic obsctacle avoidance and grass length sensing. It also is preprogrammed to seek out the tallest grass first. Better yet, it runs by converting different organic compounds in the grass into energy, meaning that it doesn't require any external power source (process does require a supply of water for power generation and cooling, though, and no provisions are made for recycling the water once it enters the waste cycle).

      I hear they work great. Where was that URL....

      I found it: http://www.goatsrus.com

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    71. Re:Uhhhh by Eiki · · Score: 1
      Motorize one of the old-style push-powered lawnmowers. Quiet, and even healthier for the grass.

      Yeah, I've heard that they produce better results. I imagine that sort of thing should be pretty safe as well - just keep the roll of blades somewhat enclosed...


    72. Re:Uhhhh by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      If you knew about lawn care, you would know that mowing wet grass is a bad idea. The blades rip the grass instead of cutting it cleanly, damaging the grass. You should mow grass when its been dry for a few days.

      All well and good, unless you live in Seattle....

      Then you mow when it has been dry for a few hours ;-) Also, the few days rule doesn't work for those of us who know enough about lawn care to water it every day (and live where we HAVE to water it every day).

      Also you have another problem. Last time I moved, I didn;'t have a lawnmower. So it took 3 weeks to get to mowing the lawn. A lawn of that length would take a long time to dry, so I ended up having to give it a "once over", let it dry, then mow it again.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    73. Re:Uhhhh by Dop · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Not only that, the wet grass will dull your blade more quickly and then you'll be ripping grass even when it's dry.

      Unfortunately, the Midwest has been pretty wet this spring and I've had to mow a few times when I would've prefered to wait.

    74. Re:Uhhhh by jwhyche · · Score: 0

      Better yet just buy yourself a goat. Self programming and mostly self maintaning. Very ecological and as a plus it can give milk. and at the end of the season you can celebrate by bbqing the fucker.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    75. Re:Uhhhh by Jaywalk · · Score: 1
      1. A robot must never harm a human being
      Well, as long as we're being obsessive-compulsive about this, it's supposed to be, "A robot must never harm a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm." I remember that because there was a story where humans had to work in a potentially hazardous situation, and the robots wouldn't permit it. So they made a limited run of robots with a weakened first law, omitting the second clause.

      Of course, if you tinker with one part of a program, you know it's going to screw things up elsewhere. (Good thing too, or it would have been a dull story.)

      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    76. Re:Uhhhh by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      If you knew about lawn care...

      I actually know quite a bit about lawn care, but I also know it has rained every day for the last week and a half. The first day I get that's less than a 30% chance of rain, my lawn gets mowed, no questions asked.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    77. Re:Uhhhh by unitron · · Score: 1

      Hey, the Paul French "Lucky Starr" books were a big part, way back in the dark ages, of my intro to sci-fi (and they even had something like lightsabers, probably where Lucas got the idea).

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    78. Re:Uhhhh by t7 · · Score: 1

      I know this is not feasible for this project, but technology similar to that used by StopSaw would be very helpful in making a "safe mower".

    79. Re:Uhhhh by newpath4com · · Score: 0

      That's quite an intriguing thought there you guys. I think we should be in agreement then that someone should make a lawnmower that dries the grass before the blades try to cut it. This would make the blades stay sharp much longer... And Seattle residents would have help with the wet grass situation. Including the first post about this from England I think he said. I would have to say that a solar-powered mower running slowly, automatically, & methodically would be able to take the time necessary to dry the grass this way. One aspect bothers me tho, this pervasive idea that eats at so many people today that if something is worth doing we shouldn't do it because some BRUCE ALMIGHTY dang company would have already done it. This type of "logic" is defeatist, brainwashing counterproductive hogwash. If inventors through our history had thought that way we would still be out clubbing animals for food and women for sex er companionship. Last year, I fixed an engine (the LN2000) by taking it from being a single energy source (compressed nitrogen) to be a 2-energy powerhouse replacement for all gasoline engines, simply by adding steam prior to the cold nitrogen. This allows the LN2000 to achieve a glut of power. It's all explained on this page: www.newpath4.com/anwar_drillitfastdrillitgoodforge taboutthneighborhood_anwar.htm with several other links to my other pages. Why hasn't the World erupted in a giant CELEBRATION THEN at the pending demise of pollution and domination by the OPEC TASKMASTER DYNASTY? The only reason I can figure is because people today have accepted this idea that if something is so damn great WE SHOULD ALREADY HAVE IT. Because of that, we may not EVER GET IT. I fixed the engine but I don't know if I'll ever get this new engine going; heck fire people, fixing the dang engine is child's play compared to fixing people's "I'm-already-defeated" attitude toward anything new and wonderful. We wouldn't have peanut butter, condoms, birth control pills or Nuthin' if Inventors hadn't stubbornly bucked people like that yet I can't help but feel that this WALL I have run into in this day and time is a taller wall than at any previous time in human history. Is that the state of humanity today? Where someone makes a non-polluting engine but it's too late to be accepted because we've been processed through some kind of TV dumbdown machine for over 50 years, effectively stripping us of our objectivity? Abandon hope all ye who enter the realm of the simple inventor.

    80. Re:Uhhhh by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      I think we should be in agreement then that someone should make a lawnmower that dries the grass before the blades try to cut it.

      Say it takes 4 to 6 HP to drive the blade confidently. If the typical hairdryer uses about 2HP (1500W), then driving a generator attached to the engine at, say, 50% efficiency would need another 8HP to drive two grass-drying units (aka, hairdryers + ducts). Thus, a 21" push lawn mower needs only a 14HP V-twin engine. I estimate the cost at about $1000. The model with the integrated beer cooler will sell for $1150.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    81. Re:Uhhhh by phr4gmonk3y · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this funny hasn't read I, Robot. In the last anecdote in the book, such an example happens where giant, mameframe(sp)/super computer like computers determine what's best for humanity via statistics.

    82. Re:Uhhhh by newpath4com · · Score: 0

      No not true. But I'd like to have one that big anyway. I'm assuming it would be REAL HOTDOG. Actually wouldn't use blades old chap. Weedeater lightweights. Remember, such a unit would be running 12-24 hours a day so it never has to be asked to whack at the high grass YOU AND I LEAVE right mate? So that takes away one of your turbochargers right there. It wouldn't have to be a full 21 incher; it could be a 21 cm single weedeating juggernaut of sheer raw power, engine:grassblade ratio. Now if we ETtrapolate a little further we would run both the drying fanblade and the weedeater string on a shared shaft, so that easily whacks away further at your grossly unnecessary cost overruns you're apprently quite used to getting. What we would need to do is make the dryer blade run first then alternatively the dryer blade would quit and our Weirdwhacker Special would cut, so that we would have a Whack-Cut Alternating Juggernaut (another fool Riley contraption). This you see is far more advanced become now than any ODDINARY LAWNMOWER. The real test question that looms over every modern invention is not just the simple question of Will it work? but rather Will your normally Christmassy-level smiling neighbors put together a mini-class action lawsuit? That's where a new invention that is "in the public eye" must have a high level of visual appeal (aesthetics). And there would have to be a facility for sharing the machine with your neighber which would hopefully serve to sway the judge with a preponderance of mitigating circumstances as long as you don't forget to wear your leg cast ito his Corkroom. Choice of a proper retail chain that would welcome the addition of such a small yet effishient li'l grassblade feller becomes critical also. While under Norms of Queensberry circumstances we would tend to Target this new invention toward the upper middle spread class of adults, in this case I think we should Target the children by using Toys R' Us as our flagship outlet chain. If we can get the young people of this great land nay the World hooked on using this little baby then it's highly unlikely as adults they would ever forsake us, and sales would skyplane-62 through the roof! We would corner the market with the li'l whackard, driving Bricks and Strata, Tecumseh & Caterpu oops Caterkitty into shameful bankruptcy and our lawn domination would continue for a THOUSAND YEARS. The selling price is also of critical importance, so we would start small, choose a number the Public would automatically embrace as the Deal of the Century ($19.95) for the children's model. (That's what we in the ad biz refer to as "the hook".) THEN WE FOLLOW YOUR SUGGESTION, gradually start tacking extras onto it so that by the time ol' Mr. Smartypants Campbell buys his'n we'll have the price upped to a very comfy $149.95 with barely $10.00 of actual cost add to the Unit. With several proper catchy naming conventions and all, like having the solar panel array painted green and shaped like a big tortoise shell we would be In Like Flint. I think, personally, that it would still be a bit heavy. But we need to remember that as soon as NASA completes it exploration of Mars we will have some new lightweight technologies we can't even dream about now. We''ll incorporate those. The important thing also is to start our little money machine out with a 1086, whine & complain, tear up a lot publicly, wear a blond wig and a nice skirt. Yes, the fly will never see the Whacker Coming. But it is, most surely; it's bloody coming.

  2. Just for you? by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If this is something that is for you only, and not for sale, then I would think it would be easy.

    If you know what objects are fixed,such as pathways, bird feeders, what-not, you could build the controller from one of those old dump trucks from the 80's that let you pre-program a course by feet and angle of turn, etc. All you need to add is a bar attached to a kill switch for when the neighbors cat/kid/dog runs over to check it out.

    --
    If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    1. Re:Just for you? by Grant29 · · Score: 2, Informative
      How much do you want to spend? Amazon has one for $1,799

      Features:

      Fully automated Docking Station mower

      Recharges it's power pack by itself

      Departs on your schedule

      Manual controller (can be used as like a traditional mower for trimming small areas)

      It seems expensive, but it if you really want it (and want it now) they are availiable. Even if you don't wan't to spend that type of cash and want to build it from scratch, I'd recommend visiting company websites that develop these and download their product brochures. You might be able to learn enough from them to get some tips on getting started. Look for white papers, FAQs, product manuals too...

      --
      9 Gmail invitations availiable

    2. Re:Just for you? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      While that is not an entirely preposterous proposition, I have to wonder if you are a troll because your comment seems to almost (?) deliberately ignore all of the complications in the problem. While the goal of mowing one's lawn is to create an orderly and even surface, at its best it will always be an irregular surface in terms of height and traction. A wheeled or even tracked robot will tend to wander when on a hill and there is no guarantee that your motive devices are accomplishing as much as you would like them to. This is all mounted to a chassis which will necessarily absorb a certain amount of shock because the blade will end up hitting things which it was not designed to cut. There are other problems but these are some or the more obvious ones.

      Those big trak programmable toys really didn't do all that good a job of making ninety degree turns. They worked best on floors and poorly on everything else - my cousins had one and I got to play with it like once but it didn't do what it was supposed to do. It was still neat, though.

      There are other problems with your plan, such as the fact that most lawns are not perfect, empty rectangles. Even if you can accurately track how far you are traveling and how far you have rotated, it's going to be a little more complex than just making a couple of right angle turns. If the problem were that simple, meaning you had a level, flat, even rectangular yard with nothing in it but grass which had already been carefully mowed not more than a day before, you wouldn't even need robotics :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Just for you? by princewally · · Score: 1

      I've got a design for a remote-controlled, programmable lawn mower. I've been slowly collecting the parts I need.

      I was originally planning on building a battlebot, but then decided to go more practical.

      The RC receivers will pass the signal to a laptop, which will record the movements in a database, so it will work on a "memorization" scheme.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    4. Re:Just for you? by itwerx · · Score: 2

      Original article: I know you can already get these, but that detracts from both my geek-drive and my wallet, both of which I'd prefer to keep as full as possible.

      Parent post: How much do you want to spend? Amazon has one for $1,799 [amazon.com]

      +5 Informative?

      More like -1 Redundant/Offtopic/Blind!
      (Follow the link to Amazon and you'll see it's for the very same product that MMonkey says is not what he's looking for...)

    5. Re:Just for you? by Grant29 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realized the redundancy of the link, but I was merely pointing out the price and availiablity. This is a product that I have not tracked pricing for, so I'm not sure if $1,799 is average, high, or low. I also do not know if this is the type of product that has had price reductions over time. I assume that as time goes on and more competitors emerge that the prices will fall even more.

      How much do you think it would cost to build one of these? The pride of building one yourself can't be measured, but there would be a cost of developing your own. Either via your upfront costs, maintenance, or time involved. Buying a ready made product does have some advantages.

      While many homebrew projects are better than commercial products, you have to be pretty handy to build a product more efficiently than a team of engineers. This company probably had a higher R&D budget and worked out lots of kinks before releasing this lawn mower through multiple iterations of development cycles.

      --
      9 Gmail invitations availiable

    6. Re:Just for you? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Or for only $499, you can get an iMow from Toro.

    7. Re:Just for you? by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 1
      It was more of a comment on the fact that, from the programming side, it is probably much easier to come up with a solution for one location, than something that will work in a multitude of locations.

      If he had a single starting point, then he could conceivably come up with a single route that did take into account the various contours of his lawn,and come up with a decent end result.

      On a side note, growing up we had a lawn that was relatively flat in one direction, and sloped down to the sidewalk in the other. My brother and I would push the lawnmower up the hill, make the turn, and then let it roll it's self down to the sidewalk. Made some pretty straight lines...without taking into account the fact that it was an "irregular surface in terms of height and traction". We just liked the idea of shoving the whirling blade of death down a hill.

      Anyways, to sum up, for his situation (which for all we know is a 10'x10' plot in central London) there may be a nice simple solution that only would work for him.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    8. Re:Just for you? by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think using "Big AI" like that would be the wrong approach, really. It is very difficult to get right and brittle to unexpected change.

      Since you are talking about your own lawn only (I assume), you actually have pretty good control over the environment. I would take a page from Rodney Brooks and from toy manufacturers:

      First, as other posters have suggested, go for a weed-whacker or other smaller, less dangerous cutting design. Compensate by planning to have it running for long periods of time, like an hour daily, essentially making it a "touch-up" design, relying on manual mowing if you let the grass get away from you.

      Second, basically forget about complicated, error-prone sensor packages. Use the minimal amount of sensorics you can get away with, and tailor them specifically for the task at hand. I would use one single front-and-sides bumper, set at exactly the level you want the grass to be cut.

      Third, tune the environment. If you have a fence, that will work fine. For flowerbeds, ponds, cobra pits and other garden features that you don't want it to run into, set evenly spaced (rounded!) wooden pegs at the edges, so the bumper has something to run into. If you think pegs will be ugly, be creative: rocks, small fencing, whatever. It needs to be only as high as the bumper - which we alreadey set at the level of the grass.

      For control, start out easy. "If we hit something, back up a few centimeters, turn a random amount and go." This can work surprisingly well if the lawn isn't too big. You can even figure out approximately how long you need to run the robot to get reasonable coverage. An added benefit of this Brownian Walk algorithm is that you really need minimal sensors - the bumper is it. You can experiment with some fancier algorithms as well - initiating a turn after some time whether you hit anything or not, for instance, or turning off altogether if you've been going forward for a very long time without hitting anything.

      If you want to add some more sensorics, like shaft encoders for the wheels, you can start to play with dead reckoning and do dynaimc map generation and other funs stuff. Even with lousy precision, you can still figure out an approximate average on how much time you've been using to cut a given area, and compensate for it by going (approximately) there for some extra random walking.

      As long as you can keep the unit simple, it will tend to be robust, and perhaps inexpensive enough that you can build two or three and cut the time (sorry) by quite a bit.

      One important thing: make sure you have a safe, convenient way to turn the thing off. Big red button on top should do it. Have the red top be translucent and add a couple of blinking LEDs inside for that "heavy industry" look that will make you the envy of your neighbours.

      And yes, BTW, I am a robot scientist, so I sort of know what I'm talking about :)

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    9. Re:Just for you? by big+tex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another idea for the 'fence' - it can be an electronic fence, kind of like electronic dog collars.

      The supermarket near where I went to college installed this electric fence for the shopping carts, where one of the wheels would lock up when it sensed that the line was crossed.

      So, bury some wire, and off you go.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    10. Re:Just for you? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Yep - except now you are adding to the sensor package and to the behaviour logic. Instead of a bumper, you now need a bumper _and_ a sensor for the wire. And of course, you need to power the wire, and if it fails, you have a lawnmower on the run.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    11. Re:Just for you? by MrNonchalant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On this same note I'd reccomend you check out this project. Video of it in action towrards the bottom. I've seen it working in the park nearby CMU, neato stuff. A little out of your league I'd think, but still worth a look.

    12. Re:Just for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget RTFA, at least RTFP, dumbass

    13. Re:Just for you? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Third, tune the environment. If you have a fence, that will work fine. For flowerbeds, ponds, cobra pits and other garden features that you don't want it to run into, set evenly spaced (rounded!) wooden pegs at the edges, so the bumper has something to run into. If you think pegs will be ugly, be creative: rocks, small fencing, whatever. It needs to be only as high as the bumper - which we alreadey set at the level of the grass.

      There may be some confusion between natural obstacles and the "markers" you have added to the lawn/grass. Trees drop sticks, kids throw balls, rocks etc. It might be a good idea to try to use markers that are sufficiently different from the environment to remain distinguishable.

      You would need to select an appropriate marker would vary based on the sensor package you use. For example scanning laser + reflective strips. You could do something similar with a couple (or more) of fixed radio transmitters. They wouldn't need to be in the lawn, they would just be needed for the robot to localise itself.

      Another thing, make it easy on yourself and load the map of the grass into the robot from the start. This means that you can use your markers for localisation, which would mean less markers. It also makes the AI for the robot a lot less difficult. With a robot using that configuration you could solve issues like controlling the thing, sensing the envorinment and basic collision detection before moving onto stage 2. Stage 2 being having the robot mapping the environment, then cutting the lawn based on that map.

      I'm not sure you want to be getting into the mapping and and locatisation stuff through. I'm afraid I am a lowly undergraduate robotics student. When I graduated most of the guys who were hanging around to do a PHD were researching more efficient methods to map and localise environments (in particular implementations of SLAM - Simultaneous Localisation And Mapping).

      --
      meh
    14. Re:Just for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those big trak programmable toys really didn't do all that good a job of making ninety degree turns. They worked best on floors and poorly on everything else.

      Glad to know I'm not the only one who couldn't get the damn thing to function properly on the ceiling...

    15. Re:Just for you? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      There may be some confusion between natural obstacles and the "markers" you have added to the lawn/grass. Trees drop sticks, kids throw balls, rocks etc. It might be a good idea to try to use markers that are sufficiently different from the environment to remain distinguishable.

      I would not. The behaviour should be the same in either case (back off, go another way), so why make things hugely complicated for no gain? The pegs (or whatever) I suggested are not "markers"; they _are_ obstacles, just like sticks and balls. They just happen to be obstacles that have been placed intentionally, to stop the machine from going somewhere it shouldn't.

      And, as I said, at least for the first design round, forget all about mapping. As the parent mentions, good mapping is still at the level of PhD projects.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    16. Re:Just for you? by jechonias · · Score: 1

      Overkill,

      1) put stake in center of garden, tie motorised lawnmower to stake
      2) start lawnmower at edge of garden with rope taut, let motorised mower go , sit on deck chair on edge of lawn reading paper, glance up every so often
      3) PROFIT! as mower circles round stake rope slack will be drawn up and motorised mower will move in ever decreasing circles till lawn is done

      Added Benefits : any anoying items in path of mower such as toys / stupid garden flowers that wife likes/ slow pets / unclaimed junk mail etc will be shreded and removed.

      volia!

    17. Re:Just for you? by dcam · · Score: 1

      I would not. The behaviour should be the same in either case (back off, go another way), so why make things hugely complicated for no gain? The pegs (or whatever) I suggested are not "markers"; they _are_ obstacles, just like sticks and balls. They just happen to be obstacles that have been placed intentionally, to stop the machine from going somewhere it shouldn't.

      Sorry I had the wrong end of the stick. That is certainly easier than what I was suggesting.

      And, as I said, at least for the first design round, forget all about mapping. As the parent mentions, good mapping is still at the level of PhD projects.

      A couple of friends of mine ran their own SLAM projects for their honors projects. They didn't do anything particularly stellar in terms of new research, but they did get a working SLAM implementation. Mind you one of them got the unversity medal so I'm not saying they are typical students. But I digress.

      What I meant though is that while good mapping is Phd territory, map following is not. Even it derived expirmentally (ie roll forward for 5m, swivel left 45 degrees etc). The problem is getting an accurate estimate of position without resorting to a Karman filter.

      While this is more difficult to do than using simple AI (bump into object, reverse swivel 15 degrees, forward until bump into another object), you are more likely to get better coverage of the lawn itself.

      --
      meh
    18. Re:Just for you? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      also note that the link he gave included his "retail retreat" website as the referrer...

    19. Re:Just for you? by dave1791 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not a robot scientist (sorry - physicist), but I have a robot navigation question.

      Why not use a constellation of transponders (RFID tags would actually be ideal - cheap and each is unique) and a two antenna setup to locate the robot's position relative to the transponders via interferometry? If you had a map (or could build one) and the transponders were in known positions in that map, then knowing where you are relative to the transponders would mean that the bot knows where it is. No need for unreliable image processing or bumpers that need to be manually trimmed.

    20. Re:Just for you? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Why not use a constellation of transponders (RFID tags would actually be ideal - cheap and each is unique) and a two antenna setup to locate the robot's position relative to the transponders via interferometry?

      Because you would need transponders, antennas, assorted electronics, software, space on the unit for all of the above, as well as time and knowledge to actually make a well-functioning, reliable system out of the pile of stuff. Oh, and you need that reference map measured up as well. Agree on the image processing; note that I do not suggest that as a solution.

      All in all, I think it is likely easier to spend thirty seconds adjusting the spring load on a bumper :)

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    21. Re:Just for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All you need to add is a bar attached to a kill switch for when the neighbors cat/kid/dog runs over to check it out.

      That's a bit extreme, surely? I don't think it's necessary to kill the neighbor's kid; merely amputating a foot would probably be enough to teach the brat not to trespass again. One wishes to be humane.

    22. Re:Just for you? by Barryke · · Score: 1

      How should a lawn robot be able to pinpoint its location, while big objects (rocks and bushes) are on the grass as well? And; I am VERY interested in robitics, could you share some resource sites and such with us?

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    23. Re:Just for you? by big+tex · · Score: 1

      True.

      However, if this sort of thing wasn't reliable, it probably wouldn't be so effective with dogs.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    24. Re:Just for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that how aliens create crop circles??

    25. Re:Just for you? by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      That was an oversight on my part.

      Here is a non-referral link: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 1ZI54W/

    26. Re:Just for you? by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      How much do you want to spend? Amazon has one for $1,799

      The FAQs on the website provided by the original poster say that the one you found for sale at Amazon is good for 16,000 sqft of lawn, and it will cut between 4-6,000 sqft of lawn on a charge (about 3 hours) then need to recharge for 24 hours.

      I've got a 26hp, 50" craftsman garden tractor that can cut the above mentioned 6,000sqft of lawn in about ten minutes, and do the work the entire machine is rated for in about half an hour. Beyond that, I've got about an acre of cuttable lawn, so I'd need to buy three of these things.

      I agree with you: it seems expensive. Triple the cost of my currently existing solution, just to save 90 minutes a week, and the result is a lawn that's not even CLOSE to evenly cut, because the entire process takes three days?

      No thanks. :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    27. Re:Just for you? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      yeah, i'm sure it was...

    28. Re:Just for you? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Well, why does it need to pinpoint the location at all? You need to look at what problem you are trying to solve (mowing the lawn); it's not clear why you need to care about position.

      As for links, google really is your friend! THere is no good resource that I know about that really covers the subject from a hobbyist perspective; you will probably need to get used to reading journal papers.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    29. Re:Just for you? by pfunkmallone · · Score: 1

      That'll teach those 3 year olds to leave their toys in the yard.

    30. Re:Just for you? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      http://www.geocities.com/zs6bne/myrobotlawnmower.h tm

      the above link is a great place to start.

      popular electronics about 15 years ago had an article series on building a robotic lawnmower also..

      you are making the sensors way too complex. you can create the mower without even a processor onboard.

      Bump sensors are a good start.

      you need to put a row of 6-10 IR sensors across the front mowing direction that stick out slightly above the mowing blade height, so cut grass will not be seen by the sensor. now simply have the robot "look" for tall grass and start mowing set it's programming to always keep 1/3 of the sensor array in a not detecting tall grass state and you will have a good amount of overlap to avoid corn-rows. bump sensors are needed only for unexpected objects and do a simple backup/turn left then move foreward manuver and this get's past most obstacles. if you want it to find it's mowing path again, wide circle back in the mowing direction it was last sucessful at and ther eyou have it.

      make it randomly choose between left or right for obstacle avoidance and you are good to go.

      hell you only need to mow a border by hand around your yard and set it loose to finish the job. mowing around trees once will automatically make the bot avoid those objects because of the sensor 1/3 empty rule.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:Just for you? by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      I remember when I was at the University of Illinois in Urbana, someone built a robotic arm that used a webcam and some image processing algorythms to pick up a pop can that it had no other idea where was.

      BTW, the main push of the project was that the robot used a learning algorythm to determine how to pick up the can. Basically all that was programmed was a way to interpret the images coming from the webcam, and a "desire" to pick up the can. This caused some interesting effects like when the arm would pass out of view of the camera, the robot "learned" to wave the arm at the camera to re-locate itself.

      My plan would involve a computer, with a WiFi link to the hardware on the mower (possibly a micro-ATX or scavenged laptop, something with a serial port to communicate with a microcontroller). Connect the computer to a webcam that can see the entire yard. Roll-your-own image processing algorythms, and there you go. Plus, for safety reasons, you could have the thing shut off when the webcam recognizes a fast moving object (neighbor's brat kid that can't keep the football in his own yard). Or, if you think you can mount enough processing power on the mower itself, you could do away with the need for the WiFi link. This would definately require the webcam to be wireless, then.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    32. Re:Just for you? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If the plot is that simple, then I would make a lawn-mowing plotter, which is to say, it would have rails attached to the fence for motion along one axis, and then the mower would slide back and forth on another rail stretched across them, and mow away. It can be floated on large pivoting casters and just drug around the yard by the arms. You might even be able to reuse a motorized pool cover system for one axis of motion. Instead of the casters, you could also implement a system that would pick up the mower and put it back down in order to move it over.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Just for you? by Barryke · · Score: 1

      Jan thanks for your response!

      Sorry, i was talking in general, no mowing neccesary here.

      Is location pinpointing realistic or just impossible for primitive home development?
      If its possible, how could/should it work?

      I surrely agree google kicks major ass;
      But i hoped you or anyone else knew some secret hidden all-knowing-and-solutions-plenty site.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    34. Re:Just for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One minor issue, is whatever you add to the ground, expect it to move, either sinking or popping up(more likely sinking) due to water action. So unless you want to keep tinkering with your "bumper" objects take this into account.

  3. another way by Coneasfast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is off-topic, but you could ask the neighbours kids, they usually will do it for a couple of quid.

    not very popular over there but many people do that over here in n.america

    even in the long-run would be cheaper than a robot solution (unless this is a personal interest i wouldn't go ahead with it)

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:another way by aaron_ds · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or perhaps your neighbor's robotic kids

    2. Re:another way by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "this is off-topic, but you could ask the neighbours kids, they usually will do it for a couple of quid...(unless this is a personal interest i wouldn't go ahead with it)"

      I'm gonna ramble off-topic a bit here, too. I just wanted to say I appreciate the tact of your post here. Seems like on every ask slashdot, there's some git that gets modded up for saying "do it in the traditional way!" in a condescending and hostile tone. I just liked the friendly way you posted this suggestion. I hope it catches on.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:another way by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      I just liked the friendly way you posted this suggestion. I hope it catches on.

      About as likely as the Beowulf Cluster jokes dieing.

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    4. Re:another way by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It took me two years and at least a dozen kids to find one who was reasonably priced (ie, less than a professional), reliable, and could do a better job than my blind wife.

      Speaking of that, he better show up pretty damned soon, the grass is getting high again.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  4. so let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    you don't want to spend an hour a week, 6-7 months out the year, mowing the lawn, but you're willing to spend a hundred or possibly several hundred hours building a lawn mowing robot?

    Enjoy your summer.

    1. Re:so let me get this straight... by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you know what's the difference between a hobby and a chore?

    2. Re:so let me get this straight... by EboMike · · Score: 1

      Or, more precisely, you'd rather program and build the robot INDOORS than mowing the lawn OUTDOORS? With those "short summers" you have?

    3. Re:so let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you know the difference between clogged arteries, snow white skin and non-geeks?

      perhaps this guy can mow the lawn, get a little sun, and a little excercise.

      god knows 99% of slashdot needs it.

    4. Re:so let me get this straight... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the bit about 'geek drive' ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    5. Re:so let me get this straight... by accidental_1 · · Score: 1

      Now I could spend many hours a week watching a robot mow my lawn. That's entertainment

    6. Re:so let me get this straight... by kfg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude, you're forgetting the audience. Here, directly from a list of sysadmin virtues in the Armidillo book:

      Laziness: Writing a 250 line Perl script to avoid typing 15 characters.

      Elsewhere in the book we find a sidebar entitled:

      Laziness Can Be a Virtue
      No one who isn't lazy writes shell scripts.
      Laziness motivates you to create new tools and utilities that make your job easier,
      more efficient, or even just more pleasant.


      It was easy for me to find these quotes. The book caters to lazy sysadmins. They actually put "laziness" in the index.

      Consider this sort of doing more work to get less done a "geek thing" and forget about it.

      KFG

  5. How About.... by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about a goat? Maybe a sheep? Set one of those bad boys loose and you'll have yourself a short lawn. Obstacle avoidance and everything built right in.

    1. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with a goat is that it will pull up the grass by the roots and you'll be left with a dustbowl for a yard.

    2. Re:How About.... by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

      well what happens when the goat or sheep starts crapping all over your lawn? thats just more work. and you would need to fence it too to prevent the animal from escaping.

      didn't think of these things now did ya? :)

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    3. Re:How About.... by mangu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read somewhere that in Scotland they use geese for the same purpose. You get a free trespasser alarm, since neither a goat or sheep will care about who enters the space, but a goose will attack first, then make a loud noise, and ask questions later.

    4. Re:How About.... by roror · · Score: 1

      fencing is a must .. but, craps can be used as manure O:-)

    5. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Problem being that the goose will also attack you. There are few animals more stupid and belligerent than geese, and they routinely bite the hand that feeds them (though not usually hard enough to do any damage - geese are stupid, belligerent and pretty ineffectual).

    6. Re:How About.... by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about a goat? Maybe a sheep?

      Oh come on. Where the hell is he going to get sheep in England?

      Joking aside the parent post need not have been joking. You can actually hire lawn care people who use sheep and goats to trim lawns. They're very effective and can be used even in the rain. They're highly water resistent, as anyone who has ever worn a proper British fisherman's sweater can attest to. Different species of grazers actually eat grass to different hights as well, so you even get that choice and they automatically fertilize as they, ummmmmm, go. They can also be used for things other than trimming lawns, but I won't go into that here.

      I fully understand the article poster's geeky itch to build a robot mower, but sheep are probably actually a more effective solution given his enviromental conditions.

      KFG

    7. Re:How About.... by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or better yet, some sort of rental service, or Rent-A-Goat, if you will. Ooh ooh patent patent!

    8. Re:How About.... by XaviorPenguin · · Score: 1

      Find a Scottsman, they LOOOOVE Sheep! j/k

      Instead of putting down sod or keeping your grass up and mowing it all the time, just invest in alot of money and put astroturf down for your lawn. That way, your "grass" is green all year round!

      --
      Friends help you move...
      REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
    9. Re:How About.... by cratermoon · · Score: 1

      yeh! You need a website for it, though. goats.com is taken, how about goatse.cx?

    10. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Plus sheep can be used for other things...

    11. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheep...Goats... but you need to confine them. If the grass is short enough, and they're hungry enough, they'll get through or over your fence.

      Plus, if the grass is that short, the stuff that will keep growing is the stuff that the sheep/goats won't eat. Over time, you'll need to mow it anyways.

      Hire a kid to do it if you're that lazy.

      Having moved up in size from typical suburban house lot to 1+ acres of grass (and 3 or so acres of pasture), I can say, yes, you're lazy.

      Of course, so am I (I have sheep to try and keep it down, but Shetlands don't eat quite agressively enough).

    12. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about sheep? Were talking english gents and farm animals, bad mix... There was a story a few christmases ago about a nativity scene in West Virgina which featured live animals. Its seems one of the security cameras caught a males having relations with a sheep.

    13. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about trying the aussie robotic lawnmower.... take one rabbit put it on the lawn and place a laundry basket over the top of it.

      Not only does it keep the lawn trimmed but fertilises it at the same time!

    14. Re:How About.... by tarogue · · Score: 2, Informative

      [...] neither a goat or sheep will care about who enters the space [...]

      Tell that to my goats! I have a Pygmy/Dwarf Nigerian cross goat and an Angora. The Angora will always run at and complain bitterly to anyone who enters his pasture. A stranger will almost surely be butted by the Angora. The pygmy will also charge sometimes, just not as much.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all. -- Thomas J. Kopp
    15. Re:How About.... by JASegler · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never been around goats.

      They WILL eat ANYTHING.

      If you've ever taken a car radiator apart, you'll see all these little metal cooling fins.

      One of my dad's friends had a goat that got out. Found the dismantled radiator on the picnic table. Ate alot of the fins.

      No, it did not survive it.

      -Jerry

    16. Re:How About.... by lerouxt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like a job for a robotic poop collector.

    17. Re:How About.... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      A buck? How do you deal with the smell?

      My uncle used to breed angoras and had a buck with horns that looked like two corkscrews each about 2 feet long - basically not to be messed with. He had several other bucks as well and during the breeding season they all stank of goat piss.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    18. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm then you don't have to worry about fertilizing your lawn either :) . The animal takes care of all the work.

    19. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it isn't Rent-a-Goatse I'm in.

    20. Re:How About.... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      prior art

      never thought reading fark would ever come in handy

    21. Re:How About.... by dcam · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. Where the hell is he going to get sheep in England?

      You could have them shipped in from New Zealand.

      --
      meh
    22. Re:How About.... by hoofie · · Score: 1

      I can remember a bonded whisky warehouse, I think it was in Dumbarton, where they uses Geese as an intruder alarm. I saw quite a large group of them wandering around outside it. Rumour has it, they were the best theft prevention as they would attack ANYONE who went near them.

      I don't think they have been used for a few years now but it was one of the stories that used to crop up in the 'Sunday Post' (that twee publication) every 10 years.

    23. Re:How About.... by artg · · Score: 1

      When I last bought a lawnmower, I got it from a little guy who ran his business out of a garage. He didn't use a lawnmower himself - he had a herd of guinea pigs that ran around the garden.

    24. Re:How About.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is illegal to run brothels in Montana, so you could not have that business there.

    25. Re:How About.... by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      No thanks.

      Ever had geese living in your garden?
      I did. They shit huge amounts right in front of your door, they wake you at 4 a.m., and they eat the (dry) dogfood.

      I rather have a dog for alarms.

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  6. Roomba + Mower by dracken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about some duct tape job of roomba and a lawn mower ? You get obstacle avoidance and area coverage for free. You can even come up with interesting names like "Rower" or "Moomba" :^)

    1. Re:Roomba + Mower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus it'll leave a really cool spiral pattern on your lawn for the neighbors to applaud.

    2. Re:Roomba + Mower by MBCook · · Score: 4, Funny
      He he he.

      "The Black Moomba - As dangerous to grass as it is to small pets".

      He he he.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Roomba + Mower by lelitsch · · Score: 1

      Way to complicated:

      1: Roomba
      2: 42 razor blades
      3: glue gun ...
      5: profit

      You might want to take out the particle bin, though.

    4. Re:Roomba + Mower by Lifthrasir · · Score: 1

      how about calling it a 'mowbot'?

      --
      No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something
    5. Re:Roomba + Mower by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      "What's step 4?"

    6. Re:Roomba + Mower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's step 4?"

      ????, of course

    7. Re:Roomba + Mower by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      OH!!! Step 5 is profit!

      When do we collect underpants?

  7. Kill Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Here's my most important suggestion - while you're testing this thing out, make sure you have a good kill switch.

    Personally I dont think this thing would ever be considered safe enough to operate unsupervised. It might save you some work, but if it went out of control or some passerby tried to tamper with it you could end up with a very expensive lawsuit. (IANAL)

    1. Re:Kill Switch by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      two words: tilt(or inclinometer) sensor.
      Once the unit detects enough tilt against the horizontal, it cuts off. Redundancy is also available from underbelly photo sensor, assuming you keep the cutting bay dark in normal operations.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    2. Re:Kill Switch by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      or have the battery power a small tesla coil which discourages anyone from tilting it in the first place.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  8. Speaking of obstance avoidance code by raddan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make sure to code-in police avoidance for when your unattended lawnmower runs over your neighbor's feet while he sleeps in his lawn chair. On the bright side, you might end up with fewer cats hanging around the yard...

    1. Re:Speaking of obstance avoidance code by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

      you might end up with fewer cats hanging around the yard...

      ...or one cat all over the yard.

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    2. Re:Speaking of obstance avoidance code by pointbeing · · Score: 2, Funny
      On the bright side, you might end up with fewer cats hanging around the yard...

      I'm somewhat of an expert at this, much to my wife's (and her cat's) chagrin...

      How to chase cats with remotely piloted vehicles (RPV):

      1. Position yourself so that you can observe the RPV but not in the same room. Make sure the cat isn't in the same room either.

      2. Place the RPV in the center of the room.

      3. Operate the RPV using short back-and-forth commands - only about a foot in each direction, please. The cat will enter the room to investigate the noise.

      4. Once the cat starts moving in the direction of the RPV, stop the vehicle.

      5. The cat will walk over to sniff the object that was making noise earlier. Once the cat has reached optimum distance from the RPV, apply full throttle and steer toward the cat. Big fun!

      6. Obtain blankets and snacks for when the spousal unit makes you sleep on the couch.

      --
      we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
      -- anais nin
    3. Re:Speaking of obstance avoidance code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thems good fertilizer!

  9. MIL by Grieveq · · Score: 3, Informative

    The University of Florida's Machine Intelligence Lab did the research 7-10 years ago. http://mil.ufl.edu/

  10. Careful!!! by mangu · · Score: 1

    This is no Roomba. Remember, the difference between a lawn mower and a vacuum cleaner is the *sharp* blades!

    1. Re:Careful!!! by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      Sharp, and enclosed. Unlike Roomba's exposed brushes... I imagine if this was built, it'd be with collision sensors design in, to stop the damn thing when it ran into something. Like a tree. Or a person. Or a pet.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
  11. Vacuum can't hurt by gonzo_bozo · · Score: 1

    Try the vacuum first and when your design works flawlessly, move on to the lawnmower.

    1. Re:Vacuum can't hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u sure a vacuum can't hurt? Just give a vacuum cleaner to Tim Allen and he's gonna put "MORE POWER" to it and end up with a mobile universe sucking everything up

    2. Re:Vacuum can't hurt by accidental_1 · · Score: 1

      Ok, but does it have an ip address?

  12. Can I scan pictures of neighbor kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I mean they'll be staring at the mower and trying to screw around with it anyway, the least I could do is plug in a quickcam to recognize the critters and throttle over their toes or something.

    I've had old folks bitch at me for going through their lawns when I was a kid...now it's my turn! As a geek, though, I bet we can do a whole lot more than yell "get off my lawn you good-fer-nuthin..."

  13. So you don't want to waste time missing ... by bloxnet · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the sunny days during your short summer. To correct this, you will spend time indoors hacking away and making a homebrew robotic lawnmower.

    The best part will be you will have perfected it by the end of August.

    1. Re:So you don't want to waste time missing ... by Psyrg · · Score: 1

      Send it to me, just in time for spring south of the equator. :)

    2. Re:So you don't want to waste time missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the right climate, you can do the hacking outdoors... not that I've ever been in such a climate but I hear there are places where it doesn't rain all summer.

    3. Re:So you don't want to waste time missing ... by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a robotic snow blower would be more a more realistic goal.

  14. Well.. by herrvinny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first reaction was, "Well, you linked to what looks like a small business site, so either that site's going down or the hosting fees with bankrupt the company". But I digress.

    that detracts from both my geek-drive and my wallet, both of which I'd prefer to keep as full as possible."

    Well, I think your wallet's going to be drained either way. You need specialized components, software, etc for a completely automated solution. And even that's not going to be the end-all (corners, adjacent to fences, etc)

    I would say start with a remote-controlled (as opposed to computer-controlled; mods, there is a difference) solution, see if you can rip apart some RC Cars, take their steering equipment out, see if you can interface to them using a RC Helicopter Remote or RC Airplane Remotes, connect up the servos, and perhaps sprinkle some detectors around your lawn.

    Computer controlled would be difficult, to say the least. Perhaps even a Masters level thesis or a really good undergraduate senior project. Hell, if you can make it fairly cheap and efficient, you have your own business.

    1. Re:Well.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ripping apart radio controlled cars to get pieces for a lawn mower is like ripping apart go-karts to get pieces for a dump truck. Only the largest radio controlled cars are at all along the right scale and those things cost as much as a robotic lawn mower, no joke - I'm talking 1/4 scale here. Even 1/8 scale is pretty small, it's about the size of a lawn mower but designed for low weight and usually equipped with a 0.15 or 0.21 cubic inch nitroethylene motor. Those little .15ci two strokes can put out a horsepower or more but they have very little rotating mass and as such won't do you any good; the ones you want to use for mowing lawns are an order of magnitude larger and heavier.

      That said, oversized radio controlled car servos can become the basis of your control mechanism - but there's no point in ripping up a radio-controlled car. The best thing to do is to get a self-propelled mower and a three channel radio and rig the thing up with some sort of system to make it drive in both forward and reverse. This could probably be done with a planetary gear arrangement, some sort of clutches, and a servo to flop it back and forth. Some (most?) self-propelled mowers are powered by a shaft which sticks upright, along the same axis as that of the motor, so designing something to fit on there should be fairly simple. However, I suggest something beefier than just connecting a servo to a linkage with a horn for your steering, perhaps rack and pinion. It's a big steering job even for an oversized servo.

      Throttle control, of course, can be handled by any dinky little servo, if you just remove the return spring.

      You can probably get an adequate ground-use-only radio system with three servos for a hundred dollars or less, but what you really want is to buy a three channel transmitter, a compatible receiver that will conveniently run off whatever power source you will choose to use (they would usually prefer to have five to six volts) and then go buy servos that fit your application. You'll probably end up dropping a couple hundred bucks on this stuff. And then you get to design the hardware to make the thing turn! Truly your cup runneth over.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Well.. by tkrabec · · Score: 1

      ahh, but you can just take the stuff from a remote control car and connect it to a series of relays to get more power to control motors.

      -- Tim

      --
      TKrabec Pahh
    3. Re:Well.. by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is a very limited and poor approach to the problem. I don't see what relays are going to do other than turn the motor on or off - what we're dealing with is a power problem. A series of relays makes even less sense, they don't help at all and will drain some amount of power and add to the weight. The thing is, smaller electric motors just aren't as effecient as bigger ones. To get more power to them you need a bigger battery. Bigger batteries weigh more. To lug around the big battery you need stronger motors... you see the problem? I think the answer is instead of taking the parts of a radio controlled car and putting them in a lawnmower, take the weedwacker spinny fishing line thing and stick it on a big rc car. Gear down the motors so that they'll move slowly and powerfully instead of fast and weak. Then you might have a viable cheapish solution. (both time and money)

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  15. Already solved. by gonerill · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The best machine for cutting the grass is available in your neighborhood for a reasonable hourly fee. There may even be one around the house you can make do the job for nothing.

    1. Re:Already solved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The best machine for cutting the grass is available in your neighborhood for a reasonable hourly fee. There may even be one around the house you can make do the job for nothing.

      What if you live in an all white neighborhood and don't have any slaves?

  16. Ummm.... yeah by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, let me get this straight ... your solution to avoid an afternoon of mowing the lawn is to spend several months automating your lawn mower?? Sweet.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:Ummm.... yeah by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If that's not true geekdom, I don't know what is. Larry Wall would be proud of him.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Ummm.... yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's how nerds do it. i know many a programmer that would rather spend an hour or two writing a program to condition some data than spend 20 minutes to hand-edit it. me too.

    3. Re:Ummm.... yeah by edalytical · · Score: 1
      No kidding. I just got a copy of Quick and Easy Math by Isaac Asimov and instead of writing practice problems myself I wrote a program that generates worksheets automatically based on some parameters. All the while knowing perfectly well that such programs already existed.

      My program has an interface that's much better that others I've seen, so maybe after I work out some bugs I'll release it. I guess my do-it-myself attitude does benefit others in the long run.

      I know I'm a little old for Quick and Easy Math, but it's fun and I'm not as good at math as I should be.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  17. Re:Simpler solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it's tougher to build a beowulf cluster out of mexicans.

  18. Go plastic! by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you considered artificial grass? It comes in a variety of colors and never needs mowing. Mine is "Misty River Green". With the optional circulated brine heating system, you can have a lush green lawn all year around, even when your neighbors' lawns are covered in snow. I recommend GrassCo brand Artificial Lawn Carpeting with its realistic texture and patented Flow-Thru (TM) drainage system. As a homeowner and lawn care enthusiast, I can assure you, GrassCo brand artificial turf is the only way to go.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Go plastic! by xenotrout · · Score: 1

      Should this be modded up or down for being an obvious astroturfing?

    2. Re:Go plastic! by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Be honest and advertise the original Astroturf product :)

    3. Re:Go plastic! by ed__ · · Score: 2, Funny

      bad idea: the plastic grass would probably be harder to cut than real grass.

    4. Re:Go plastic! by psetzer · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, Scientific American had ads for Astroturfing your lawn back in the Sixties. Of course, everyone frolicking on the 'grass' was wearing a good solid set of shoes.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    5. Re:Go plastic! by dcam · · Score: 1

      No joke, people in Australia are putting on artifical grass. It has more to do with restrictions on water use here, but it is happening.

      --
      meh
    6. Re:Go plastic! by G-funk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doesn't grow as fast tho.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:Go plastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered artificial grass?

      Have you considered using JBOSS? Its much more artificial than ordinary artificial grass.

      p.s. I am not a JBOSS employee.

    8. Re:Go plastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can always use an inflatable sheep instead of a real one

    9. Re:Go plastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we already have heated roads in Japan, so maybe this is the next logical step?

  19. Search the library by bluGill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back before everyone had the internet Popular Electronics (or one such magazine) had a couple articles on this. Lookup it up in the library, you did get the skills of searching in school, didn't you? They operated on batteries, but you could do whatever so long as your managed to power your computer.

    The idea was a bunch of sensors, made up of LED senders and receivers. Mow a path around the yard, plus around any trees, and then turn the mower on. It should attempt to keep 2 sensors out of grass, and the rest (~20) in the grass.

    BTW, mini-itx boards now have 12 volt power inputs, so things should be easier in many respects.

    1. Re:Search the library by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

      Popular Electronics (or one such magazine) had a couple articles on this.

      I remember reading those articles. A bit of googling turned up references to one of the articles: "Build the Lawn Ranger" in the June 1990 issue of Radio Electronics.

    2. Re:Search the library by CyberVenom · · Score: 1

      Several years ago (maybe as far back as the early 90's?) Popular Mechanics ran a cover story on a solar-powered self-controlled mower-robot. Unfortunately I don't remember exactly which issue, and my own collection of PM doesn't go back that far.

    3. Re:Search the library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lookup it up in the library, you did get the skills of searching in school, didn't you? They operated on batteries,

      Dammit! My school never issued me these! Where do I go to find out about these battery-operated searching skills?

    4. Re:Search the library by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I remember an even simpler Pop Mech story. The guy started with a self-powered gas mower. He attached a rope between a drum and the mower. It ran in a spiral around the drum, the diameter of the drum was arranged so it shortened the rope 1 mower-width per revolution. Just jab the drum in teh center of your lawn, start up the mower and it mowed a nice clean circular area. Then you just clean up the corners of the yard manually, the big areas are already done.

      Simple, effective, and does 80% of the job without any complex computer crap. You can do the last 20% yourself.

    5. Re:Search the library by stienman · · Score: 1

      I have the article. Somewhere...

      They used two spinning plates with tiny hinged blades on the edge (three blades per plate) so they would swing back if hitting somwthing hard instead of robbing the motor of power (also the plates acted as flywheels).

      It used one or two lead acid batteries and had a drive motor and a cutting motor. It used the rake leds to determine if it was still on the cutting line - it would try and keep one side of the LEDs clear, and the other side blocked by grass. I believe the author guided it with a remote to go around the perimeter and any obstacles at first, then let it do its thing.

      It could only handle a tiny amount of grass, though, so you'd have it cut daily when the grass was growing fast.

      It would probably be easier now to use some location algorithms.

      -Adam

  20. Keep it Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Materials: (1) Self Propelled Lawn Mower
    (1) long rope
    (1) stake

    Step 1: Plant stake in yard
    Step 2: Tie rope to stake
    Step 3: Tie other end of rope to lawn mower
    Step 4: Start mower.

    1. Re:Keep it Simple by jrl87 · · Score: 1

      and a whench (sp?) that is computer controlled or programmable to move it closer to the stake so it mows the whole area of the circle, not just the circumference

    2. Re:Keep it Simple by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not quite. The rope gets rolled around the stake, pulling the mower closer at each turn.

    3. Re:Keep it Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 5: Profit!

    4. Re:Keep it Simple by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Uhh... that's great if you have a circular lawn. I've never seen anyone ever who had a circular lawn, so I don't think your idea is going to be a popular solution.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    5. Re:Keep it Simple by accidental_1 · · Score: 1

      Only one flaw in it.
      No internet access.

    6. Re:Keep it Simple by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      Materials: (1) Self Propelled Lawn Mower
      (1) long rope
      (1) stake

      Step 1: Plant stake in yard
      Step 2: Tie rope to stake
      Step 3: Tie other end of rope to lawn mower
      Step 4: Start mower.

      You forgot a step...

      Step 5: Profit.

    7. Re:Keep it Simple by obotics · · Score: 1

      i'm SURE he wasn't joking or anything... :|

    8. Re:Keep it Simple by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      You'd need a small triangle of 3 stakes or 1 large diameter stake to pull it in most of a lawnmowers width..

      Not very safe, but I like it

    9. Re:Keep it Simple by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      bah, who cares.. it gets most of the lawn and it's really cheap... just have to wire up the safety switch so it doesn't shutdown the mower when you release the handle and let it fly...

      This will get the job done half assed while you build a more functional model to replace it

    10. Re:Keep it Simple by yellowstone · · Score: 1
      Materials: (1) Self Propelled Lawn Mower
      (1) long rope
      (1) stake

      Step 1: Plant stake in yard
      Step 2: Tie rope to stake
      Step 3: Tie other end of rope to lawn mower
      Step 4: Start mower.
      Step 5: Mower turns on coyote and mows off half his coat.
      Step 6: Road runner gets away (again!)
      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    11. Re:Keep it Simple by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      Actually, this isn't so funny. When I was growing up, an old gentleman who lived behind me mowed his back lawn this way because he was more or less completely blind. His wife would guide him out with the mower, tie up the rope and let him go.

      I don't remember if they moved the stake to handle the corners of the lawn, but it was a very small yard, and his wife handled the edging.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
  21. Robot Lawnmower by dangerz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Try looking at something like this:

    http://ltilib.sourceforge.net/doc/homepage/index .s html

    I think the kill switch should be completely seperate from the entire system though. That way if other things fail, the kill switch can still be hit and no matter what goes on with the rest of the system it still kills the power.

    Eventually, once it's all done, tweak it to see how fast you can make it work. Then make it so it can use a set of waypoints. After all that's done, enter it in the DARPA Grand Challenge and judging by last years results, you might actually have a chance!

    --
    The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
    - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Robot Lawnmower by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      This problem is slightly easier than the Grand Challenge, but it is still pretty hard.

      You could set up a differential GPS system to have an accurate measure of where the mower is and where it has been. Add a wi-fi network to send data back to a server that would be doing the actual decision making. You could add a manual training mode to teach it where the obstacles and edges are. This would be especially helpful if the lawn is at all complex, which most lawns are.

      Finally, make sure that the mower is a mulcher, unless you have another robot that can empty the bag.

  22. Watch your bits by Stonefish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A friend's neighbour decided to build a ride on lawnmover. Problems arose when decided to take the mower for a test drive. The Blade guard was off and halfway through the test the seat collasped and he had to put his foot down. Needless to say he gets around really well on his new leg.

    1. Re:Watch your bits by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Prosthetic foot vs. prosthetic butt. Hard choice, I guess. The butt would be easier to replace.

      No, seriously, why would he ever remove the blade guard?

    2. Re:Watch your bits by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      My friends brother decided that he could create a homebrew hovercraft using four hover mowers, needless to say his four mowers needed new blades after they were driven into the concrete by his overbearing girth.

  23. Think safety and just make it an RC vehicle first by Radical+Rad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounded like you want to make it autonomous but I think you should just try to make it telerobotically controlled at first to get the kinks out of your hardware design, adding some H bridges, sensors, and a laptop later on. It might be safer to build onto a store bought mower with a clutch that can disengage the blade. That's uncommon though and you probably won't find one at a garage sale. So the cheapest and maybe safest route would be to make a mower using the weed whacker concept of a spinning spool of heavy nylon cord. If an accident happens at least you won't lose an arm.

  24. Buy some help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Too bad you guys don't have Mexicans over there in the UK. Did you check Ebay to see what a good used Mexican is selling for? Even the used ones can mow lawns fairly well.

    1. Re:Buy some help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have other types of illegal immigrants though. Plus with the recent EU expansion there is an influx of eastern europeans. Infact if they Murdoch controlled press has taught me anything there should be more immigrants than British people here by now!

  25. there's a movie about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099611/

  26. The MowBot by openSoar · · Score: 1

    You could get some ideas from this one.

    1. Re:The MowBot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From their FAQ:

      "Q: Is it safe?

      A: Treat it like a traditional mower & don't forget the blade is very sharp. Make sure your garden is clear of any items lower than 15cm."

      ...a traditional mower has an operator, so this is a dodge. Hmm. The pet & child issue needs to be addressed here, not avoided. Anyone have keen ideas for this rather than knee-jerk Randisms?

      Like after mapping the area, recognizing new objects and refusing to cut when they approach.

  27. Redundant? How so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait, perhaps. Troll, maybe. But how can it be redundant when *NOBODY* has mentioned Mexicans before, in either thread or story? Hey, editors: make sure the fuckwit who moderated this "Redundant" never gets to moderate again. Or, better, give him/her/it the Mexican citizenship!

    1. Re:Redundant? How so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - using Slashdot to make racist comments against Indians would be redundant, but racist comments against Mexicans???

  28. Be careful! by real+gumby · · Score: 1

    Let this fine film be an instructional video for what could go horribly wrong.

  29. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    baltar!!!! omg it's baltar!

  30. Simple solution with no electronics involved by JiffyJeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    My dad did this just to get a chuckle out of the neighbors:

    1. Get out your self-propelled "push-style" mower.
    2. Measure the cutting width
    3. Place a post in the center of your yard that has a diameter equal to or less than the Cutting Width / pi.
    4. Tie the inner wheel of the mower to a rope that is fixed on the post.
    5. Start mower at edge of yard and as it winds itself around the post, it pulls itself inward toward the center.
    6. When finished, trim the edges of the yard and you're done!

    Easy cheesy, and it'll make your neighbors think you're bonkers!

    1. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. Then pick up the whole thing and put the stake further down your non-perfectly square garden
      8. repeat 15 times
      9. visit doctor to repair hernia/sliped disk

    2. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by tunabomber · · Score: 1

      Tell your dad to stay the hell out of my damned cornfields!
      I keep on findin' circles all over the place! And his mower sure has bright lights- it's kept me an' the missus up on more than one occasion.

      No kid, finish your water- it ain't "contaminated".

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    3. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by stienman · · Score: 4, Informative

      My father did this with my help. Use a 6x6 piece of lumber (about 2 feet long) and round it (he used a jig and a table saw). Then pound two stakes into it so you can stake it to the ground when needed.

      Take a self propelled motor. Attach a stiff rod to one side of the deck so that it extends past the front about 2-3 feet. Tie a rope to the rear of the mower and then to the front of this rod with some slack in the middle.

      Experimentally determine a good spot along that rope to attach another rope such that when you are holding it the mower tends to turn slightly towards you. Attach that rope to the (now staked) 6x6 post in the middle of the yard. Start mower, defeat the dead man's switch (usually a bar you have to hold to keep the mower going) and let it go.

      Tricky problem (left as an exercise for the reader): The rope tends to self wind up past the top of the post. Especially when mowing large tracts of land.

      And yes, the neighbor kids did make fun of me at school. Saved me from mowing an extra acre though, so I didn't much care what they said.

      -Adam

    4. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by Man+of+E · · Score: 1
      Here's another low-tech solution:

      1. Meet opposite-sex partner.
      2. Have kid.
      3. Make kid mow lawn for allowance.

      Easy cheesy too, but you won't be able to patent it, there's probably some prior art somewhere.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    5. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Nail a Frisbee to the top of the center post.

    6. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by jcp797 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but by then the grass will be pretty tall

    7. Re:Simple solution with no electronics involved by el_gregorio · · Score: 1

      just start with the rope already wound, and let the mower unwind it and move outwards, instead of moving inwards.

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
  31. Next: by omarius · · Score: 4, Funny

    AskSlashdot: Building a homebrew prosthetic foot?

  32. Don't build One Big Machine by kraksmokr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you really want to be different consider an autonomous swarm of mowing machines. The guts of a Roomba would be a good starting point! I'd like to see a self-organizing mesh network created by the mobile mowing agents.

    Good luck - I'd love to see this when you're done!

  33. simple ... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Why not dismantle one of those robotic hoovers and attatch it to a black and decker flymo?

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  34. If I recall... by jcelgin · · Score: 1

    ...they already tried something like this, but with cars... DARPA. :)

    And, well, it turned out a miserable failure. But good luck!

  35. I was thinking more... by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    Brain Dead for the climactic final scene...

    --

    Yay me!

  36. My advice by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Interesting


    First, build the logic. Take an RC car and use it as a lawnmower simulator. Connect your steering/avoidance circuitry to the car and see if the car acts like you want a lawnmower to.

  37. Even simpler... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Weedkiller + Green paint. Mix. Apply.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  38. Why? by Trigulus · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know its a neat sounding project but you are totally missing out on the satisfaction of having your yard groomed to perfection by illegal immigrant labor. And for the cost of a robotic mower they weed,edge, sweep,fertilize,etc... every week for more than a year!

    --
    If something exists that does not need a creator (god) then why must the cosmos need one?
  39. Lego Mindstorms? by ikekrull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First, get yourself a couple of Lego Mindstorms kits (so you have all the motors ans sensors you might require), and work up a useful collision-avoidin/path-cutting bot in your living room. maybe put it on a big sheet of paper, arm it with a felt-tip-pen, and tweak it's path-cutting algorithms like that.

    Then, if you want to do more complex things - IR rangefinding, ultrasonics etc. strap a PalmPilot, Zaurus or some other PDS with IR on it and feed the midstorms controller unit with instructions from that.

    Once you have it more-or-less foolproof (and you will probably want to run a wire round the maximum extents of your lawn and have a hall-effect or similar sensor pick up on it and kill the mower if it breaches that boundary) - then you can think about attaching a proper mower body and blade to it.

    Then you'll probably want to port the whole thing to an embedded Linux u-Controller, and sell it for enormous profits.

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
    1. Re:Lego Mindstorms? by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      I second the recommendation of the Lego Mindstorms controller. It's about the best simple controller you can find around for a stupid robot like this.

      I will tell you, though; this project will be way more trouble than it's actually *worth*. My freshman year at OSU, we spent a quarter making smaller robots to do a similar task. Just getting something like that to drive straight under computer guidance is a bit of a challenge, although there are methods to doing so that you'll know if you've studied feedback signals. The most important thing to remember is that you can get very complex behaviors out of stupid code. Use distance and bump sensors and have the robot feel its way around the yard without actually knowing where it is. That's the only way it'll find it way short of a massive system and crazy AI/cameras on the whole thing. It's the only way NASA is able to make the martian rovers do anything.

      You'll need sensors for basic navigation and distance checking. You'll need very sensitive bump sensors around the entire thing, in addition to any sort of IR setup you want to try.

      You can get basic robot that will eventually do the entire lawn and not mow over anything hard with some pretty simple bump-sensor programming. Getting something that will mow a nice line is only somewhat more difficult, assuming you have driving straight and turning accurately figured out. Then, since you're just mowing your own lawn, you can program exact numbers and have it navigate the path as a series of steps.

      The biggest issue will be safety, of people and flowers, as some things that would be dangerous to run over probably won't trigger a bump or even IR sensor. If you just wanted something to mow a lawn with a fence around it and maybe a few posts or something, I'd say I could probably build it for you. It's dealing with more variables that makes this a difficult problem.

      As for motor recommendations, drill motors and old window lift motors are very good for these sorts of projects. Drill motors are about as strong as you'll find in their size (and generally, if you pull them off a drill, come with a very nice drill gearbox already), and window-lift motors are worm-driven, so they have a lot of slow torque with no back-driving. They're also fairly cheap.

      The only technical examples I can think of for reference for this are battle bots and the FIRST engineering robot competition. Check out The Chief Delphi FIRST Team's website for good information about building robots of about this size.

      Good luck. From my personal experience, I'd say it's a very large task to be considered just "interesting" for one guy, but it would be kind of cool to see.

    2. Re:Lego Mindstorms? by l0wp0ly · · Score: 3, Informative

      I once started on this: http://www.lowpoly.com/lego/index-lawnbot.htm

  40. Autonomous Lawn Mower Competition by Tekmage · · Score: 5, Informative

    There was an Autonomous Lawn Mower Competition going on earlier this month - saw it mentioned on robots.net

    --
    --The more you know, the less you know.
  41. electric sheep by Random_Goblin · · Score: 1

    so surely what we should be suggesting is that he build robot sheep?

    1. Re:electric sheep by kfg · · Score: 1

      so surely what we should be suggesting is that he build robot sheep?

      Well, but that just means he'll have to build an android to dream it up first, and then he wouldn't need the sheep anymore.

      So I guess what I was really suggesting is that he build a robot -- a girl robot.

      Unless he's a Scot, in which case your suggestion amounts to the same thing.

      KFG

    2. Re:Electric sheep by Tatarize · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I'd say slow would be the best way to go. Primary because it opens the door to photovoltonics. You don't want to labor in the hot sun... but for the robot that could be food. I don't think having any grass in the robot is a good idea. It'll clog. But, then a swinging blade out in the open might not go over very well with the laws of robotics. Then there is the issue of transport. I suppose wheels.

      Then again you could always plant a strong spinning laser in the middle of your yard. No moving parts. You could solar charge it. And best of all the fire department is usually pretty nice.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    3. Re:Electric sheep by TheoMurpse · · Score: 0, Troll

      "You could get a nasty robot bite, but it wouldn't require a trip to the neurosurgeon."

      yeah, cuz man! when you stick your BRAIN/SPINE into the thing.....

      neurosurgeon?!? ^_~

    4. Re:Electric sheep by mroch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what it would take to reattach a severed digit and still have it movable. Go figure... nerves are part of the nervous system, too!

    5. Re:Electric sheep by zuzulo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As you say, this looks like a great candidate for simple robotics and emergent behavior. Instead of a 'flock of sheep', however, imagine a 'colony' of robotic 'ants' that simply wander around the yard snipping grass blades one at a time to specified height and carrying the cut remnants to the 'ant hill' where a human empties the hopper every so often and the ants recharge themselves.

      Might make a good thesis or senior project for someone.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    6. Re:Electric sheep by peacefinder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seven years ago, I was sitting on a train, on vacation, watching the rolling plains of eastern Germany go by the window, when I thought of something like this.

      What I envisioned then is a little beetle-like walking robot. It would move very slowly, but very persistently. It would have something very like mandibles with something very like a sense of taste, and would keep track where it is by means of a combination of GPS and a mesh network between dozens of them. There were other little details, like a milch-bug with a substantial power plant that the others could "nurse" power from, supplemental solar arrays on their backs, that sort of thing.

      But they weren't for cutting grass... they're for cutting weeds.

      Currently, people plow fields, plant a monoculture, and then use herbicides to selectively kill the non-crop plants. They do this not because it's the best way to grow things, necessarily, but because that's what our technology has supported and made efficient since the invention of the plow.

      But what if a swarm of little robots could sow and tend a field without plowing? They could walk among the crop, taste every plant that they come across, and chop off the ones that don't taste like the crop. Even chew them up into mulch. Gently, persistently, precisely. No soil compaction from heavy tractors. No herbicides, no resistant strains of weeds.

      I thought it was a great little vision. I never have had the gumption to try carrying it off, though, so here it is for anyone who wants it. Just don't patent it, or I'll fish out this comment as prior art. :-)

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    7. Re:Electric sheep by Lost+Dragon · · Score: 0

      Electric sheep! Brilliant! Robots would finally have something to count before bedtime.

    8. Re:Electric sheep by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      like the sheep idea because it leads off in more interesting directions. ... With the electric sheep, you can set a number of more interesting goals than having it walk a predetermined path.

      Anyone else think of Realdolls.com when they read this?

      --
      -Styopa
    9. Re:Electric sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope...just you.

    10. Re:Electric sheep by alecks · · Score: 0

      Interesting Idea... but what if you just put a strong spinning laser inside the lawnmower (replacing the blade).... be a hell of a lot quieter and lighter.

    11. Re:Electric sheep by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Then just add a composting tank to the sheeps belly.
      So it could fertilize the grass while it cuts. :)

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    12. Re:Electric sheep by muzthe42nd · · Score: 0

      Actually, grass is not a good fertilizer. Too acidic or something like that. Alls I know is that Alan Titchmarsh says you shouldn't put it on your compost heap.

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  42. Homebrew Mowing by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I've never considered mounting a home-brew fermentation unit on a mower. But I'm starting to like the idea.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  43. technology... by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

    The tech isn't there yet. There is something similar to this idea, it's a supposed "smart" floorvac called the Roomba which is just dumber than a pile of bricks. Not to say this is the leading technology in the field, but i'm fairly certain it's an indication as to where retail autonomics is at. Also remember the Darpa Project with autonomous ground vehicles, some of which, didn't even make it out the gate.

    I hate to discourage your effort, but hey.. you get sun, you breathe fresh air not recycled by a case fan, and sweat off a few mountain dew pounds. It's a win-win situation!

    1. Re:technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, as mentioned earlier the tech is here. See this link to the RoboMower

  44. Son, get off the computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mow the lawn already!
    -Your mom

  45. My dad had automated lawn mowing.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... until I moved out.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:My dad had automated lawn mowing.. by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Yeah no shit, that was my dad's response to automating the lawnmowing.

      Just have kids.

      Oh wait... that requires sex...

      sorry...

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  46. The simple way by macman552 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've seen a lawnmower with the drive held down tied to a pole, and the lawnmower will go around and around, and after each turn, the radius of the circle gets shorter and shorter... not quite as geeky, but definately as effective.

    --
    Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature to help me spread!
  47. Ask the USAF by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe you could attach a mower to one of these.

  48. USE the ISAAC32 Robot controller by kff322 · · Score: 1

    I have had great experences using these to controll other robot rigs. Plus, there easy to program and can take a hell of a beating. Go to: http://www.ifirobotics.com/products.htm

  49. electric "invisible" dog fence by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They make these gizmos to keep your dog inside the yard, called the invisible fence. You bury this wire in the ground, the dog wears a wired up collar, he gets close to the buried wire and gets a zap, turns away. That's the theory. I don't think it works all that well with dogs, but for another electrical thing it probably would.

    So, you start with one of them. That will keep your mower inside the designated area wherever you bury the wire. The mower part is an electric self propelled mower, They make them, you buy one of them. You'll have to make all 4 wheels drive so they can be individually activated for steering. Take the steel blade off, replace it with a string trimmer head, they are lighter, work about as good, and safer somewhat, and give you longer range on a battery charge. Now how to make it bounce off the obstacles and go in another random direction you got me, but I've seen several different cheap toys do it, so that tech has to be out there as well. You would have to add that into in the signal from the invisible fence to activate the turning mechanism, so you would get both kinds of turning, planned turning at the fence line, and random off of odd obstacles, like you sitting in your chair with a brewski or whatnot.. You turn the thing on, aim it out to the yard, let er go, it will randomly go around and trim, and being all electric, won't be all that loud, so you can run it a lot. If it consistently misses an area or two, just hand cut that part. Seems like the cheapest easiest way to go, but I am talking out my nether regions as well, might be a bear to make, no idea. I mow all day long mostly, or trim, or cut, or some other various chew up the jungle action, so I have thought of this many times, and can't think of anything heavy duty enough to do it on a big scale that wouldn't be dangerous as all get out for my purposes (one of the mowers I use will cut to almost 20 feet high and has about an 8 foot blade, so no way that could be a autonomous robot), so I've never tried to build one. But man, when it's 90+ F and near-equal humidity like it's been recently, I SURE HAVE thought about it...

    Now a big female amazon warrior robot that you could task to drive the mower-among other things-now you're talking! And flyin cars!

    %^)

  50. Don't forget by MrYotsuya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't forget to add some evil Battlebot settings!

  51. ha ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you ought to try mowing the eastern Oklahoma jungle, forget a high dollar riding lawnmower, tractors & brushhogs are fine if you just have a field or meadow and dont want or have trees.

    where i live i prefer to keep my trees for shade, i wear out a gas powered push mower every 2 years...

  52. been there, done that by marcjw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just copy the technology behind this one:
    Robomow

    --
    . Ergo sum cogito - Yoda
  53. One already exists by helix400 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slashdot editor Pudge mentioned he uses a robotic mower in a recent journal entry. If you're too lazy to read it, the link to the mower is here http://www.robomower.com/robomo.htm.

    1. Re:One already exists by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Ummm... that's the mower he linked to in his post when he said they already exist, but he'd rather build one than buy one to save some money and protect his geekliness.

      Are the mods drunk today?

    2. Re:One already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy am I a moron. I didn't see that link in the main article. Oh well, I was just trying to help.

    3. Re:One already exists by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      You're not a moron, you were recommending a good solution.

      I have an RL800 and it's awesome. Can't imagine you could part together anything nearly as good or as safe. My lawn always looks good and I have to say it's a real joy sitting on the porch watching the neighbors out on their mowers when it's blazing hot outside.

      There's a very good review of the 800 on epinions that even has a howto video for the setup.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    4. Re:One already exists by Zepalesque · · Score: 1

      Can that puppy handle sloped lawns?

  54. Other ideas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about having a remote control mode? so you can use it like an RC car.

  55. GPS trained? by tbaggy · · Score: 1

    I'd like a riding mower that you can train with GPS or something. After a few training sessions, you could let it go itself.
    Collision avoidance is all and good, except when you have a pond...and when you collide with the water, well its too late.

  56. robocut by priich · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.robotshop.se/micro/wwwrc_us/indext.htm
    robocut

    Might be an interesting kit.

  57. Maybe I missed something... by nmb3000 · · Score: 1
    Uhhh, perhaps I missed something, but last time I checked, the UK has Winter, Fall, and Spring seasons amazingly similar to North American ones where believe it or not many people don't mow their lawns!

    Oh, that's right. Forgot building robots is a Summer activity only. Oh well.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
    1. Re:Maybe I missed something... by mikechant · · Score: 1

      We do *not* have 'fall' in the UK. We have the much more dignified 'autumn'. Though my favourite season name is the French 'printemps'...

  58. Re:Simpler solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the replies thus far it seems to me that no visitors of slashdot have fenced in yards.

  59. Maximum Overdrive by kaos_ · · Score: 1

    You may want to checkout the movie Maximum Overdrive. There's a great scene that shows how robot lawnmowers can improve our lives.

  60. Good Idea, But No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you ever used an electric razor? One pass won't do the job. Hell, three or four passes and you're still looking at a few stray hairs. Besides, in order to be remotely effective, the holes would need to be at least the size of a child's fingers.

    1. Re:Good Idea, But No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's the point of a robot, isn't it? to do jobs that are too repetitive for humans?

    2. Re:Good Idea, But No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      yes, chopping off children's fingers is such a bore.

      chop chop chop
      all day long
      chop chop chop
      while I sing this song

    3. Re:Good Idea, But No. by Eideewt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's odd that some people reflexively post anonymously, even when they're being genuinely funny or interesting. It's also odd that I don't have the sense to post AC, even though I'm not at all funny or interesting.

    4. Re:Good Idea, But No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I don't know, I thought that post was interesting. But then again, I have a psych degree.

    5. Re:Good Idea, But No. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      in order to be remotely effective, the holes would need to be at least the size of a child's fingers.

      And to be totally effective as a torture device, the holes would have to be large enough for adult fingers as well. :)

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    6. Re:Good Idea, But No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You too huh? How's the welfare check treating you?

    7. Re:Good Idea, But No. by boisepunk · · Score: 1

      glorious jihad
      crap post
      praise allah
      we will trike down the infidels
      all praises to allah

      amen

      --
      main(0)
  61. No time to mow,But I'd LOVE to spend 3-5 months... by potus98 · · Score: 1

    the last thing I want to be doing on a sunny day is mow the lawn

    But I'd LOVE to spend 3-5 months building an over-engineered gadget that, if it ever works, will probably require 10-30 hours of repair and maintenance per 1 hour of lawn mowing.

    In the US, we find some kid, pay him $20, and be done with it.

    (Hmmmm... Now if I could have a robotic weed-wacker... "Hey honey, I'll be in the garage!")

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  62. Lawnmower run on beer manufactured at home??? by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1


    It's a novel idea to brew up your own fuel for the mower (sugar + yeast), along with the alternative "trial runs with various liquors" when not brewing for mower fuel, but the alcohol content in homebrew beer just isn't enough to sustain an internal combustion engine.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
  63. Use a weed whacker. by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, if you go ahead with this, don't use a regular metal mower blade. Use something like a weed whacker--a nylon string. Coverage is far less and speed is less, but speed shouldn't matter in this application. So what if it has to make 4x as many passes...

    --
    Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
  64. It's just all logic by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1
    Well you probably don't want a dumb robot with large spinning blades going loose, so you'll need very good obstacle avoidance logic. You could use ultrasonic, or ir rangefinder. But none of this is exactly cheap either.

    Basically all of the software development should be done on a smaller scale indoors. Because the actual size of the area to traverse does not matter. Not sure about lego mindstorms though, aren't they rather limited in their program complexity? I'd rather use Java or C++, or Perl.

    What would be even more fun and probably bust your budget would be remote control via wifi, with a video link. Then you really could chase cats and dogs :)

  65. I don't know about the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I saw an article for homeowners a few months ago about mowing lawns. They said that if you have a typical lawn (ca. 1/2 acre), if you can get it done for During Spring Break, a lot of kids (usually jr. high or high school) go door-to-door trying to line up Summer gigs.
    (Most of the kids are competing against teachers, who have plenty of time to earn money as well, although they usually form painting companies.)
    Anyway, the kids usually think they want $45us or $50us, won't bag (even if we supply the bags), and often won't do trim work (even if we supply the trimmer) and they don't have a self-propelled machine, so they feel they have to charge more for the extra labor.
    We've got a landscaper in the neighborhood who works in one of the other sections of our county (it's #2 in the "fastest-growing counties" - my wife hires him a lot too - easy for both of them. Anyway, one of his guys does the lawn for $25 on his way back to our neighborhood to pick up his vehicle. He uses a mulch blade, self-propelled machine and does the trim work. He does 1/2+ acre in a fairly short period of time.
    Do I need a different way to have it automated? Not really. There's no worry about it running loose in the neighborhood (although having a good umbrella policy which includes excellent homeowner's coverage helps), etc. Anyway, for ca. $400us/year, I have no worries about getting it done and having done it for free at home growing up, I don't have to do it myself.

  66. Get a Cow or a Goat by bluenawab · · Score: 1

    No spending on gas, you get fertilizer + milk + meat... I hate to see all these lawn mowers burning gas and doing something totally unnecessary... I am gonna buy myself a herd of cows, and wander around the town, offering lawn-mowing services.

    1. Re:Get a Cow or a Goat by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Better make sure you're a Freeman first, otherwise driving cattle is illegal between 10am and 7pm. I kid you not.

  67. Simple Do It Yourself Project by siriuskase · · Score: 1

    Very easy, just get yourself a self propelled lawnmower, and one of those invisible fence systems, for keeping the dog in the yard. Tie the deadman switch wide open and let the mower be the dog and it's all set to use. Put those invisible fence dog collars on all the kids and dogs so they won't come in the yard and the mower won't leave and that's it. You could do the whole thing in less than an hour.

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  68. Robotic Mowers Not Far Off by wjyoung · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work for a company building a robotic lawnmower for commercial use. I'm in charge of software development. We have a few working proof-of-concept prototypes and are currently taking our design to production. I am in need of a skilled, dedicated embedded software engineer.

    If you live in the southeast Michigan area, are interested, and possess several of the skills below, please contact me.

    * fluent in C/C++
    * embedded programming skills
    * relational database experience
    * controls theory, including optimal control, adaptive control, and state estimation
    * CAN networking
    * brushless motor control
    * navigation and path planning

    Regards
    Bill

  69. "lawnmower gets loose, 3 dead" by Cprossu · · Score: 1

    well probably not....now because i for one AM crazy i say first of all-NOT UNATTENDED...bad idea...now a remote control lawnmower would be cool... stick a couple wireless cameras on it, link the throttle to a servo and some kind of quick release for the stop lever....make sure the quick release is activated when(or if) the mower goes out of radio range... proximity sensors are easy enough to pull off, and if you were dedicated you could set it to stop the wheels when one was set off..... as for the drive mechanism, find a couple old electric wheelchairs and you are set...you are gona have to do some serious hacking with th lawnmower to get them to fit and to seal them off from all the dirt and grass which gets thrown by the lawnmower... i like the concept and almost built one myself, but realized that it would be incredibly stupid granted my yard is small =)

  70. Fl by krokodil · · Score: 4, Informative

    You should read an excellent book: "Flesh and Machines: How robots will change us". It is written by Rodney Brooks. His company (iRobot) was behind Roomba design. The book explains algorithms used in it.

  71. Why build it.... by Frennzy · · Score: 1

    Just have this guy come over and use his helicopter to do it. (long wmv, but well worth watching...make sure you watch long enough to see him set the thing down on the ground upside down.

    1. Re:Why build it.... by bat2k · · Score: 1

      amazing...completely off topic, but amazing.

      --
      My other sig is a Porsche.
  72. Hardware Ideas by Eisenfaust · · Score: 5, Informative

    If I was going to do this, I would start here (I've used their products for years).

    http://www.tri-m.com/products/engineering/index. ht ml

    I would use the MZ104 CPU Board. They have a Linux distro you can throw on a DiskOnChip pop that in along with a regular old 64mb laptop SODIMM and you are good to go.

    You can use the IR104 i/o board to provide 20 digital inputs and 20 digital outputs. This should allow you to hook up some simple sensors as well as giving you control capability. You may also need some sort of Analog I/O board, but I would avoid this for cost reasons.

    The MZ104 CPU Board also has an I2C Bus interface with linux driver support. There are a plethera of different sensors available that you can directly read from this simple two wire bus.

    These products are extremely affordable, rugged, low power and small. The entire system can run off of 5VDC. You can even lower the clock rate to save power.

    If you do decide to go along with this, please add a wifi card and a web cam so we can watch it mow in real-time.... (uhhh oh slashdotted lawn mower)

    You could obviously do this with something that had a lot less horse power, like an 8051, HC11 or Z80, but you would have to make up a lot of custom circuitry to get the job done. I like the modular nature of the PC/104 form factor. If you do opt for something with less power, I would definately make sure it has a built-in i2c controller.

    --
    Grrrrr... don't bother me, I'm thinking.
    1. Re:Hardware Ideas by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Hmm, a TINI based lawn mower. I could see that plus you can run with 1 wire ADC circuitry with is relatively inexpensive for analogue sensors. The whole dev board setup is a bit expensive at 100 bucks but you can build you own much cheaper if you are patient enough to work with surface mount components. It also has an arguable advantage of being able to be programmed in java and tested in a shell like environment called slush.

  73. Simulated Prototype as a 4th year project by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I made a simulated prototype of a fast/simple algorithm, which was 100x (IIRC) faster than random wandering in my tests. A bit of information is here.

    It requires that the robot know its position rather accurately, but if it's a hobby you could use differential GPS (which would add too much to the cost of a low-end commercial robot). You might look into localisation via wifi.

  74. Hire someone! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    Hire someone to mow your lawn! (Over there, "across the pond", do you say "rent somebody?" I ask that because you hire cars.)

  75. whitewash by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    this is off-topic, but you could ask the neighbours kids, they usually will do it for a couple of quid.

    Here in America, you tell them how cool it is to mow the lawn- and they can't do it, they're not cool enough. But, maybe- just maybe- if they pay you, you'll let them do it.

    Now whitewash, that's a whole other story.

  76. Just keep these things in mind by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Funny

    points to consider:

    1. Make sure the robot does not take an interest in finding Sarah Conner.

    2. Should you be enjoying a lazy day in the hammock while the mower does its job, and you hear some incidental music start up that sounds very 'AC/DC-ish', Get your sledgehammer or other non-complex machine based method of destruction ready.

    3. Do not power the robot with alcohol. Take extra care not to power the robot with malt liquors such as 'Olde Fortran', lest your robot develope a penchant for petty theft.

    4. klaatu barada nikto

    5. Consider brushing up on Asimov's laws of robotics, just so's you get them right.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  77. Robotic Lawn mower may prove to be too difficult by DrDebug · · Score: 2, Funny

    > So, have any Slashdotters done this before? Did you modify an
    > existing lawnmower or build a whole new one from scratch?

    Naw, all that obstacle-avoidance and guidance is too much of a pain.

    I was just thinking of something simple, like a robotic vacuum cleaner... :-)

  78. A cheaper, efficient, accurate alternative... by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Pay $10 or so per week to get the neighbor's kid to mow my lawn. At least, he is somewhat reliable!

  79. Re:Simpler solution. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

    Who is going to that much trouble to build something that has no brain and just stands there?

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Yes, let's hop in the wayback machine! by superpixel2000 · · Score: 1

    In the late 80's I remember a series of articles in one of the "homebrew" electronics magazines (Electronics Monthly perhaps?) regarding just such a machine: a robotic lawnmower.

    I've thought about it since then, but I can tell you what I remember.

    The functional pieces (meaning the nasty cutting bits) were dual discs with small hooks mounted on swivels. There were three hooks (they were flat hooks, like mini-scythes) per disc, and they rotated in opposite directions. Centrifugal force would propel them outwards and I assume this was a "it won't bust itself on a rock" mechanism...

    As for the self-mowing part, here's what you did. You had a memory bank and rudimentary control system. First you would manually drive it around the perimeter of your yard (and anything else you didn't want to get cut up), thus programming it with the borders of your area.

    The rest I forget. Keep in mind we're talking late 80's-- crappy batteries, crummy microcontrollers, etc.

    It was simple, but it looked like it would work. If I hadn't been a high school kid whose parents poo-pooed every cool idea I had (business ideas) then I'd have mass-produced the suckers and made a fortune by now!

    Hope this helps!

    --
    did you win a free ipod? build a case for it here
  82. Edge sensor by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

    "you will probably want to run a wire round the maximum extents of your lawn and have a hall-effect or similar sensor"

    The commercially available robot lawnmowers use this. Lay the wire around the perimeter of your lawn and around obstacles like flowerbeds. It takes the guesswork out of edge detection.

  83. RFID Perhaps? by (mandos) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Finally, a use for RFID that the /. crowd could like. You could put a reader in the mower and then put the tags around the edges at strategic points so the mower knows where it is. Then use an old iPaq (you can run Linux on them www.handhelds.org) or a mini-itx board with a little software logic and voila, instant mower. The software could be simple to, just a basic map program plus a series of vectors to tell it where to go. Hell, Logo with that turtle would be able to pull this off. Just some ideas for your mowing enjoyment.

    Then again, a video camera with "grass recognition software" might be more fun. :-p

    Mike Scanlon

    1. Re:RFID Perhaps? by blanchau · · Score: 1

      Great idea, I was thinking of a set of RF devices planted around objects and using triangulation to determine precise location. This would build in some error checking; if one of your calculations is off, you won't have a precise point of reference; either a transmitter, or the reciever is off kilter, or the math is wrong. Great general idea also, please establish a URL we can follow to keep up with your progress.

  84. Everyone is thinking too hard... by farzadb82 · · Score: 1
    The simplest solution is often the best, and on that note, I suggest getting a really powerful laser.

    Have the laser mounted so that the grass height can be adjusted and then have the laser sweep the yard, cutting any pieces of grass longer than the pre-adjusted height.

    Of course this will only work on a flat, small area.

    You can take a modified version of this that will work in a fixed square area mounted on wheels. Have the robot move over the area that needs to be cut, settle the frame against the ground, for reference and then sweep the laser to cut. The robot can then get up and move to the next square area to be cut. Moving like this, you can cut the lawn in square areas. Cutting curved areas, however, will be a challenge.

  85. Black & Decker electric mower works great by cool_st_elizabeth · · Score: 1

    with a 100-ft cord, I can do the whole yard. I love mowing the lawn. Yeah, I know I'm weird.

  86. old school solution by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    buy a goat. have it tethered to a stake. move the stake inna geek designed patern. you may have to disguise the beast as a dog depending on your zoning regs... end of summer, sell/slaughter said goat depending on your penchant for gyros.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  87. I say lucky robot by RealSalmon · · Score: 1

    Why would you want a robot to do this job? Lawn mowing is one of the truly great pleasures in life.

    You like beer, right? Grab two or three or six and toss them in a cooler. You like music right? Grab some noise cancelling headphones and your stocked iPod. You like to tinker right? Take up small engine repair, and keep your mower running smooth and sharp.

    Hop on your mower and roll, man.

    --

    -B

  88. cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure version 1 supports targeting the kittens playing on the lawn, with an error checking routine that will cause the mower to backup over the kitten if it doesn't do a good job on it the first time.

    Anyone else remember that old set of screensavers on Win9x with the flying toasters and well, a lawn mower, a meadow, and a bunch of kittens *evil grin*?

  89. Electric sheep by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's an interesting idea, but I doubt you could get the grill fine enough to prevent fingers from entering without.

    The underlying problem is the amount of kinetic energy you have in a spinning blade. The less kinetic energy, the safer. A spinning fishline is going to be safer than what amounts to a giant spinning knife.

    Of course the reason you need the kinetic energy is so you can cut a lot of grass very quickly. With a conventional lawn mower, you can probably mow about a square meter or more per second. It cuts down on the drudgery time. But since the author is building a robot, drudgery is not an issue. So why not go slow?

    I am imagining something that is very, very slow. Something that moves slowly from place to place gently cropping a tiny amount of grass at a time. In other words, an electric sheep (with apologies to Phillip K Dick). You'd calibrate the jaw strength so that it is enough to rip up a mouthful of grass easily, but not so strong it would sever a finger. You could get a nasty robot bite, but it wouldn't require a trip to the neurosurgeon.

    I like the sheep idea because it leads off in more interesting directions. I'd think you'd run out of ideas for a robotized conventional mower. With the electric sheep, you can set a number of more interesting goals than having it walk a predetermined path. For starters, you could give your robot sheep a simple vision system so it could perceive the edge of your walk and touch up the edges. What would be interesting is to train it to visually recognize certain objects: it perhaps could recognize common lawn pests like dandelions or plantains and give them an extra close crop. Maybe it could retrieve the paper the paper boy threw onto the lawn and put it on your front porch. Maybe you could teach it to recognize beer cans and throw them in a recycling bin. You could make several of them and have a flock and begin to program them to interact in interesting ways.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  90. talk to these guys first by theycallmeB · · Score: 2, Informative

    these guys work in the guidance and navigation laboratory at IIT, conveniently located down the hall from the wind tunnel lab where I work (hence my sig below). Beware though, designs such as this may inspire some sarcastic and mocking comments from the more machine shops techs who put it together for you.

  91. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf cluster of....well, nevermind..

  92. goodbye lawn games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello fertilizer! Anyone who lives in an area of the country where geese migrate can tell you that you probably won't want to go barefoot on your lawn for a while if you choose to keep geese there.

  93. Aside from Asimov's laws... by unfortunateson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget to make sure it's not programmed to go back in time and kill your mother. She's not named Sarah Connor, is she?

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  94. last thing i want to do is mow the lawn by jdkane · · Score: 2, Funny
    With the seemingly small amount of summer we get here in the UK, the last thing I want to be doing on a sunny day is mow the lawn.
    ...
    Then I started thinking about stuff like obstacle avoidance, optimum path planning, guidance system, how to get pretty-looking stripes, and I realised that it's actually a potentially complex (read: fun) thing to do. By the time you get that thing built you'll need a bush hog to cut down the long grass.

    So the first thing you want to do on a sunny day during your short summer is build a complex lawn mower? It sounds to me like a priority thing rather than a summer thing. I should insert a comment about "true geek" here, but this reference should suffice.

  95. Here ya go by megabite1 · · Score: 1

    Take a look at this
    http://www.geocities.com/zs6bne/myrobotlawnm ower.h tm

  96. solved with two words... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    ...helper monkey

  97. Push mower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've thought about this a lot. If I were ever to do it, I would use a reel mower. Modern reel mowers have blades that don't touch, so they're easy to push. No engine means pollution free, and fewer parts to break. And with sealed bearings, maintenance would be virtually non-existant. Plus, your motor will not only provide propulsion but also the cutting power. I would try something like this: http://www.cleanairgardening.com/brilreelmowp.html

  98. DARPA Contest by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

    if this was that easy i doubt that they would have the DARPA challege Your not going to get anythign easily to do this. I recomend you take the time to do it yourself, it would be good exercise too. Sometimes there something to be said about doing things manually.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  99. Buried wire tracking system? by wash23 · · Score: 1

    If you could rig some sort of buried wire recognition system (magnetic?) you could have it follow a preset course that you could bury in the lawn yourself... (idea from the robomower site which alluded to something like that: " With the Rl1000 and the Docking Stations, it's even easier! After completing the one-time set-up of wire around the lawn including the Docking Station, set the weekly program and forget about mowing for the entire season! ")

  100. how to do it: by vectra14 · · Score: 1

    a) get two|three|four big DC motors (gearing probably a good idea but you could probably find two large ones at a scrap yard somewhere)
    b) get a breadboard and a micro (i recommend atmegas - chip is ~$5 + $9 for programmer + compiler (WinAVR) is free/opensource
    c) get a 5v linear regulator, some optoisolators, and (easiest) get some cheap high-amp MOSFET's (remember that you can always put them in parallel for pretty much unlimited current)
    d) get a pair of crappy linx RF serial modules (cheap, easy to set up)
    e) use 9v battery for digital power supply. use the biggest possible lead acid for motor power supply
    f) go nuts!

    (if you dont know how to hook these up together, you should first experiment with simpler circuits. epanorama is a good source of info)

    estimated cost: $60 + existing lawn mower

    1. Re:how to do it: by vectra14 · · Score: 1

      forgot:
      use either sonar or IR rangers for either determining where you are or simply avoiding obstacles. you can also use feather switches as a last resort

    2. Re:how to do it: by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Not quite that easy as people's yards are not all built like basketball courts. Many have hilly areas which easily fool both sonic and ir range finders into avoiding obstacles that don't exist.

      Stereoscopic reverse 3d mapping might be a better way to solve the problem with a 3-4 ft fixed focal length. Alignment can be done through successive approximation.

    3. Re:how to do it: by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Just wondering where the linx RF serial modules can be picked up for cheap. Used a set a while back and it was about 60 bucks total shipped.

    4. Re:how to do it: by vectra14 · · Score: 1

      i cant find the cheap linx modules i've seen before, but there are some really basic laipac ones for $10 at www.sparkfun.com. (granted, you have to do packetizing/filtering yourself)

      This is also the place where you can get really cheap atmel avr programmers and a $4 surfboard for atmels atmega128 (a tqfp-44 chip!)

  101. almost but not quite completely off topic by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

    One of my dad's co-workers built himself a super-sized lawnmower. He welded a frame, added wheels, and mounted 3 old push lawnmowers. He tows the contraption behind his ATV.

    I assume he had to do the detail work the old-fashioned way, but I'm told it mows wide-open spaces very quickly.

  102. Robotic Deathtrap by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    I have like two acres of grass to mow every week, so trust me, I've thought long and hard about ways to reduce my work.

    I decided that I could even go all out and make it really precise; maybe something like GPS for setting approximate bounds for my yard, and then really low-power beacons to mark the edge of the yard.

    I decided there were a few main things that would give me problems:

    1.) You want your lawn to be straight lines. Things like the Roomba seem to just run around aimlessly until they hit something, then they take off in a new random direction. Your lawn would be the ugliest monstrosity on the street.

    2.) Suppose your pet cat runs out in front of it?

    3.) Will it crash into the 'ornamental' trees on my lawn? And if you're going to detect it, how do you know exactly how wide tree is? And how do you detect that there's a 3-foot-wide ring of mulch around the tree?

    4.) Suppose the 'tree' you avoid is actually my dog running across the lawn. Are you going to constantly recalculate its position?

    5.) Out in front, my lawn has a multilayer terrace thing going. How do you avoid driving driving right over the edge? (Like a three foot drop. I've almost gone over this on my ride-on mower a few times.)

    6.) Do you know the *exact* bounds of my yard? I don't want strips out by the street where it decided it was getting too close, but I don't want a multi-car-pileup after my lawnmower charges into the street.

    Anyway, it's probably possible to overcome these. The problem is that, unlike something like the Roomba, you've got sharp blades spinning at completely lethal speeds. If the Roomba goes haywire, you'll stand there and laugh. If the Lawnba (*please* don't call it that!) malfunctions, run. Fast.

    It's really a question of how much faith you have in computers. And between my experience with Windows and Java, I don't have a lot.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  103. a midwest US resident responds by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    i don't mind mowing my 1/4 acre every five days in the summer months, but the damn leaves in the fall from all my mature oak and walnut trees take forever to corral and haul up to the top of the hill that is my backyard. i'd rather have a robotic leaf blower that would blow all that stuff into my neighbors' yards like during the day when they're at work.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  104. Re:On second thought... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
    do you really want a lawn mowed in the erratic pattern that Roombas use (some sort of random spiraling pattern designed to cover all areas of a room)?

    That's pretty much the way it gets cut when I push my mower around anyway...

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  105. Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by rben · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm, sheep runs on the grass it eats, nibbles all day and is not particularly noisy. Better still, unless it is a Ram, it's unlikely to chase the neighbors. :)

    --

    -All that is gold does not glitter - Tolkien
    www.ra

    1. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by WhiteDeath · · Score: 2, Funny

      just needs a little tweak in the obstacle avoidance circuit :-)

    2. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by k.ellsworth · · Score: 5, Funny

      and the sheep's poo make fertilizer for the lawn, so it's a perfect system, sheep trims grass, sheeps digests grass, sheeps return fertilizer to the grass, grass growns better.... and so on

      --
      Putting a windows cd backwards, plays evil messages, but it gets worse, putting it right, installs windows.
    3. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by casley · · Score: 1

      You're from New Zealand aren't you?

    4. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by B747SP · · Score: 1

      Sheep no good. Sheep leave those little black jelly beans all over your lawn.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    5. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      ...and sheep taste better than robots. hmmmm... robots

    6. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      And if you can't get a sheep pregnant!

      *Referencing an earlier post about paying a 20 year old coed to mow lawn, wash car, look hot so you can wank off.

      And if you do get a sheep pregnant, you have free milk!

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    7. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheep are notorious for nibbling grass all of the way down to the nubs. That's why shepherds have to move them often. If you have a sheep permanently parked on your lawn, you're likely to have little nubs of grass instead of a lawn. But hey, if that's the look you're going for...

    8. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by asynchronous13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's unlikely to chase the neighbors

      They just might chase the neighbors... I went hiking in an area that had a few sheep scattered about the hillside. One moment I looked up ahead of me to see a sheep charging directly at me! I had never experienced this before, so I faced the sheep head on and prepared myself to dive out of the way if necessary (I was thinking to myself, 'I'm about to be attacked by a sheep, noone is ever going to believe me....'). Very quickly, the other sheep saw this one, and started trotting my way. The first sheep slowed down just before impact, stopped at my feet, and commenced staring at me. That's when I noticed that every sheep in view was now headed my direction. I kept hiking and tried to ignore them. But its hard to ignore 40-60 sheep following you. I tried running, they ran. I tried standing still, they stood still. I couldn't shake them! I had fears that whoever owned the sheep would suddenly appear with a shotgun and accuse me of stealing his/her sheep. I only managed to escape when another hiker appeared following the trail in the opposite direction. When we passed each other, the sheep got confused and started following him.

      Sheep are dumb.

    9. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 0

      Naa this doesn't work. THey tried to use sheep at the High School I went to. They put like 2 or 3 sheep inside a fenced area around the sewage pond so the grounds crew wouldn't have to go inside to mow it. They do "mow" the grass, however they are picky and only eat the grass in certain areas. So the school has 3 sheep and they still have to mow that area.

      --
      If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    10. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by jpostel · · Score: 1

      ROFL... I would have freaked out.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    11. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which leads me to a thought I had.

      How do cemeteries make money after they've sold all the plots? As far as I can see, there's no cash flow. How to decrease costs and generate some revenue?

      1. Cut maintenance costs by introducing sheep to maintain lawn.
      2. Open petting zoo on the side.
      3. Sell wool.
      4. Eat occasional lamb chops with mint gravy and some nice fries with malt vinegar and some mayo/olive oil/pepper for dipping and a tasty bourbon stout beer.
      5. Profit! (is that how that works?)

      Or is this idea already patented?

    12. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but RAM is cheap nowadays!

      BBWWWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Sorry, couldn`t resist.

    13. Re:Ummm, sounds like a sheep to me by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      I'm imagining this scenario happening with the Serta counting sheep. rofl.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  106. Just buy a Robomow www.robomow.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've had one for several years and it works VERY WELL. They even have newer models for big freakin yards (TM). Other than buying new batteries and blades every two years, this thing has been great, not to mention the looks on my neighbors faces when he's out there cutting the lawn.

    They've also released a home vacumn cleaner, which is next up on my must purchase list. . .

  107. False economy by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    I know you can already get these, but that detracts from both my geek-drive and my wallet, both of which I'd prefer to keep as full as possible.

    If you want to build one for fun or as a learning project, great, by all means go for it. But if you value your time at all, you're absolutely kidding yourself if you think you can build any kind of decent (read: safe and reliable) autonomous lawnmower for less than the price of a Friendly Robotics RL-1000 ($1800 at Amazon) much less the far cheaper RL-800 ($800) and RL-550 ($600) models.

    Right off the bat, you have to consider how you're going to power this thing. Gas? Electric? Electric will be easier to instrument and control, of course, but you've got that pesky power cord to consider. Wouldn't want to run over that, do ya now? You don't have to worry about the cord if you go with a self-propelled gas mower, but steering is a hassle. It may also be a little more difficult to make sure you can stop the blade quickly as soon as you encounter a dangerous situation. Batteries give you the best of both worlds, of course... separate motors can drive the blade and each rear wheel, giving good control over the blade, decent propulsion, and steering. And you can use the batteries to power the electronics, too. Of course, batteries will also add to both cost and weight.

    I predict that if you consider your time at any reasonable hourly rate, you'll find that getting to the point where you've got a robot that you can drive around the yard via remote control will cost you a LOT more than the top-of-the-line RL-1000.

    Incidentally, building a remote-controlled lawnbot is probably a good way to go. Put just enough electronics on the bot itself to communicate with a mother ship and to shut down the machine at the first sign of danger, like when someone lifts it up. Something like a BASIC Stamp with a RF package would be a good, cheap way to go. That way, you can build a human-operated remote control for testing and such, and a computer-operated one when you get to that point.

    Again, I'm not trying to dissuade you if you're into building such a thing for fun. Just make sure you're paranoid about safety, or it might not end up being so much fun. But if you want to keep your wallet full, either buy a ready-made version or (as someone else already said) pay the kid next door to mow for you.

  108. BattleBots by CptKron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Think of your lawnmower as a BattleBot. You've got a drive system (wheels) and a "weapon" (the blade). Okay, it's not the greatest analogy, but we're talking about components of the same caliber, and I know a little bit about this type of robotics.

    Building your mower from scratch would be something fun and geeky and not *too* difficult if you know how to weld and such. If you take this route, consider using battery power for the drive train and a small engine for the blade. I recommend electric power because it is easier to interface with a navigation computer and allows for easy reverse if you get stuck up against an obstacle. You could even use another electric motor for the blade. In any case, a good source of electric motors is NPC Robotics. They also have wheels you could use. I think a remote control system would be neat, even if you don't want to drive it around all the time. You could use it to guide the mower if it's "lost" or as an emergency shutoff from inside the house. A manual override feature would be cool to just drive it around for fun, too. Of course, this makes things expensive. But a neat way to do this would be to use an IFI Robotics Isaac 16. This system includes a radio and transmitter plus a BASIC Stamp computer that is easily programmable and allows the reading of 4 analog inputs and 8 digital inputs (sensors on the mower). This would allow you to have, for example, an "RC startup" button inside your house that would remotely trigger the mower to begin running, then use the programming features for automated mowing. It could be both RC and autonomous, really. With that system, you could use a couple of Victor 883 speed controllers to regulate your drive motors. There's also a spin controller that would be perfect for your blade if that were electric powered. Otherwise, a simple gas engine with a servo on the carburetor throttle would suffice for control of that.

    If you don't choose to go with this (very expensive but neat) RC setup, you could use a much simpler BASIC Stamp. This is the "brain" of the Isaac 16, but minus the radio and PWM signal drivers (for speed controllers, servos, etc.). They run a lot cheaper ($150 for a basic setup) and are still very easy to program (a modified BASIC syntax) but you would have to wire your own interfaces to speed controllers. This can be done, but I have no experience with it. In any case, the BASIC Stamp would allow you to connect various types of sensors that you could use to gather data and then modify your path accordingly. The Stamp is probably a better choice than a Mini-ITX or similar because it is cheap, not overkill :-P and has all the programming tools set up, ready to go, and designed almost specifically for robotic applications.

    So check some of that out. I hope that helps if you're looking to build something from scratch.

    Oh yeah, if you're concerned about powering an electrical system for long enough to mow your lawn, a few 12 volt lead-acid batteries of the type used in motorcycles or smaller car ones will likely suffice. I believe they can deliver around 14 Amp-hours or so.

  109. NETCRAFT Confirms It... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

    Beowulf Clusters dying! With the passing of escape key inventor and father of ASCII Bob Bemer, the character strings that power the terrible jokes are just too despondent to get up and go to work. Textual prozac sales have skyrocketed.

  110. hovering robotic lawnmower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about putting some inertial/vision systems on this puppy?

    http://www.diy.com/diy/jsp/bq/product/product.js p? &CATID=182628&PRODID=205388

    3 Gyros, 2 accelerometers, a well-tuned PID loop, a GPS unit with some way points, maybe an altimeter and you could mow your whole neighborhood's lawns...

    That was supposed to be funny, I know it wont fly, but you could build something that would...(I'm working on it.. not a lawnmower) more later.

  111. Here's My Suggestion by telstar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's what I'd recommend. It'll cost you about $10 per mow, but it's worlds easier than building your robomower.

  112. hrmmm by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    I honestly would do the most simple thing, and create a PC controlled system.
    eg, a daemon on your system would control a radio control and control the lawnmower like a RC car, or better yet, just control it yourself.

  113. Are we talking about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most economic device I have ever seen and it is totally automatic. It seems that it can also detect grass by the flavor.
    http://www.ismennt.is/not/astridur/veflei dkindur.h tm

  114. Anyone consider... by mikeb39 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That perhaps leaving a small and valuble robot on your front lawn all day where less-then-respectable people can just grab it and walk away might be a poor idea?

    I suppose you would build a larger version with the blades on the front to guard the smaller robot from would-be thieves though...

    But that probably reintroduces the problem of it killing curious kids by mistake.

  115. don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't automate or robotize anything as dangerous as a lawn mower.

    No matter how safe you think it will be; the debug phase is deadly dangerous, and maintaining it in the face of entropy and growth in neighbor's use of devices that send signals (that could affect the behavior of your running lawnmower) spells danger.

    Automate OTHER stuff !

  116. The Canadian way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Pick up phone
    2. Call The Lawn Guy
    3. ?
    4. No profit

  117. Tilt sensor by 1000101 · · Score: 1

    I would put a tilt sensor on there that will shut off the motor if a specified angle is reached. This will help preserve hands and feet of any kids who try and lift it up while it is on.

  118. Electric sheep - heeerrreee flossie by Suchetha · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other words, an electric sheep

    mmm electric sheep.. now where's my magnetic gloves and kneepads?

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
    1. Re:Electric sheep - heeerrreee flossie by TarpaKungs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Are you Welsh?

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    2. Re:Electric sheep - heeerrreee flossie by Suchetha · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      no but my brother-in-law's ex-roommate's cousin visited there on a school outing.

      Suchetha

      --

      learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
      or one out of three ain't bad
  119. Re:On second thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a horde of drunken, psychotic Zen masters"
    wow! that phrase just makes me smile!

  120. Not short enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're too lazy to mow the fucking lawn but want to embark on a freaking engineering journey to solve a non-existing problem? You need help, friend, preferably in the form of a willing and sympathetic MOTOS.
    When I read shit like this story, I really question the sanity of the so-called nerds, and I wonder if I shouldn't hand in my membership card. I mean Jesus H. Christ....

    1. Re:Not short enough by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      When I read crap like your comment, I really question the sanity of the so-called nerds, and I wonder if I shouldn't hand in my membership card. You do realize that some people have medical issues that could benefit form this. some people have allergic reactions to contend with, some people may be physically disabled in some way. Some people may spend their weekends building homes for Habitat for Humanity. Some people may just freaking hate mowing the yard and prefer to wor out at a gym for physical excercise. Some people may tend to suffer from heat exhaustion. Don't be so quick to judge.

    2. Re:Not short enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure, so instead of hiring some local kid (you know, like, helping the local economy or something), he'd rather spend money on this idiotic project?
      You know, engineering and nerdism isn't always about gee-whiz techno-masturbation just-because-we-can, it's about finding the best solution to a given problem. And this 'problem' can be solved in about 12 nanoseconds by anyone with half a brain.

    3. Re:Not short enough by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      I'm all for hiring the local kid. Have you actually tried that lately? Not likely going to happen. Most kids won't due it or charge as much as a professional service. Keep in mind all those parts they buy go intot he economy too. And we all know alot of parts are gonna be bought. And if they do come up with something that goe sinto production, that creates jobs too.

  121. Take the Italian approach.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pave the yard.

  122. Cheap (and serious) solution by CowboyRobot · · Score: 1

    If it were me, I would forget about a gas engine and a spinning blade, and start with a set of electric hair clippers - the kind with a pair of bladed combs where one vibrates over the other, creating the same effect as about a dozen pairs of tiny scissors.
    Grass is bigger than hair, so you'd need to replace the blades with larger ones - something on the scale of those on electric hedge trimmers, but maybe not that big.
    Then attach it to a remote-control car - preferably one with big tires.
    And change the power supply to a big solar panel and large capacitor. It will probably only be able to go several meters a day, depending on available sunlight (but this is a summertime-only device) but that should be adequate for a small lawn.
    For the obstacle avoidance, you could use almost any simple robotics kit or plan to have it always turn left 90 when it hits an obstacle.
    You certainly won't get a perfect lawn, but I would start with this as an inexpensive prototype first.

    --
    every stain tells a story
  123. Radio-control mowers by Darth+Yoshi · · Score: 1
    I know you're interested in autonomous mowers, but I found these links to radio-controlled mowers which may be useful for ideas for the mechanical bits.

    Homemade Radio-Controlled Lawn Mowers

    Hybrid Remote Control Lawn Mower

    Radio Control Lawnmower

    Robo-Mower

    --
    // TODO: fix sig
  124. Re: Building a Robo-Mower. by JimB · · Score: 1

    Take a trip to the library. Look through the Popular Science magazines from 1967 && 1968. In one of the issues (I no longer remember which), there are details on how to build a 'robo-mower'. They called it something else, of course. It uses the same type of "fence" mentioned by 'zogger' previously, and when it finds the 'fence' it turns to mow in a different direction. :>D

  125. I did not believe until I read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The below is a review by New York Times from a couple of years copied from:
    http://www.homebotics.com/Pages/review_Time s.htm

    Pull Up a Lawn Chair and Watch the Robot Mow-the Grass
    By MINDY SINK

    ALTHOUGH many futurists have envisioned robots that could relieve humans of ordinary tasks like cooking and cleaning, people must still do most of the domestic drudge work, at least inside the house. But outdoors, the future is here. in the form of mow-bots.
    One of these devices is the Robomower, designed by Friendly Robotics, whose United States office is in Abilene, Tex., can propel itself around the yard, cutting the grass and even turning the clippings into mulch, eliminating raking from the to-do list.
    The Robomower Limited Edition Silver Classic has been on the market in Israel and Europe for about 18 months and in the United States since late last year. The latest model, the RL-500, costs $749 and will become available in the United States in June.
    Robomower is not the only robotic lawnmower around. Husqvarna. a Swedish manufacturer, makes two robotic mowers, including one that was introduced in 1995 and runs on solar power.
    Husqvarna's machines, called the Auto Mower and. the Solar Mower, cost $1,999 and $3,000, respectively. Installation- yes, installation -- Costs $250 to $300.
    Each of these lawnmowers needs guidance from a wire that is installed around the perimeter of the yard; the wire is usually on the surface of the ground, but it can be buried a few inches underground. The mowers may be robotic, but they are not very smart. They need to be told where to go and where not to. Each mower contains sensors that detect signals from the wire and direct the machine to stay within the mowing area.

    Even if the mowers do what they're told, they can have some trouble with hills and tight corners,
    Although robotic mowers may appeal to anyone who needs to cut the grass, some people could benefit more than others from this hands-free approach.
    "We have a lot of people who say, 'I have waited all my life for something like this,'" said John Bunton, products manager for Friendly Robotics. "People with allergies, disabilities, the elderly, people with heart disease -- for the first time, a lot of these people can maintain their own lawn."
    Mr. Bunton said his company's machines, which use battery power for both propulsion and cutting, were environmentally friendly, with none of the air pollution and little of the noise of gas-powered mowers. He said that about 700 machines had been sold in the United States since December and that a few thousand had been sold

    abroad in the past 18 months.
    The machines from both companies look a lot like canister vacuum cleaners without hoses or attachments, The Robomower RL500 tips the scales at 71 pounds, including its rechargeable lead-acid batteries, while the Solar Mower from Husqvarna weighs only 16 pounds.
    After the Robomower mows along the perimeter one or two times, it starts cutting from one side of the lawn to the other, moving over for each new path. The Solar Mower and Auto Mower turn whenever they reach the perimeter, cutting swaths of grass in angular patterns that are not repeated until all the grass is cut.
    The original Robomower can work for three hours before its fixed battery must be recharged; the RL-500's battery, which can be removed for recharging, works for up to two and a half hours on one charge. Husqvarna has designed its mowers to
    stay on the job, mowing small amounts at a time but mowing frequently.
    A robot mower can be hazardous for children and small pets. "It is deceptively quiet for a power tool," Mr. Bunton said, "This has a large blade underneath it"
    Although the mowers have proximity sensors so they can avoid large obstacles, the lawn must be cleared of objects, just as it would be for an ordinary mower, before a robotic mower begins work. "It's not going to go around and pick things up for you" Mr. Bunton said, "You

  126. Some Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider setting up something to figure out your robot's relative position. You can figure out the position using three wireless signal emitters of some sort and math (trilateration).

    From there, you could take your bot and walk around your lawn, pressing a button to mark a vertex for an inclusive or exclusive polygon. Basically paint where you want the bot to mow. All sorts of other pathfinding information can be input this way. With the polygons you could mark off any major obstructions, and leave minor obstructions (rocks or trees) to your sensors and pathfinding.

    So, with the bot knowing the geometry of your lawn and its position, you could devise an algorithm to give it a clean cut.

    At this point you'd have wireless communication at least partially figured out, so as your next challenge you could get a swarm of these bots to cooperate.

  127. nothing beats a real flying lawn mower... by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

    We used to have this flying lawnmower that my dad got back in the 60's. It had no wheels, just a fiber glass body, a motor and a blade. It flew on a cushion of air created from the blade spinning. It was called a Flymo 19 or something like that..

    --
    Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    1. Re:nothing beats a real flying lawn mower... by 4nd3r5 · · Score: 1

      well back in the 60's.. hmm They are truly called a flymo, and you can still get them here. And they are bery popular in small european countries..

      --
      spelling is for people who doens't know better...
  128. nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I used that mower last weekend.

  129. Re:Uhhhh. Saftey w/ lasers! by smokin_juan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Use an ultraviolet laser to vaporize the grass. That was my thoughts when I thought about building a robomower... that and radio triangulation. Burns sure suck, but at least they don't break bones. I was all set to do this until I stared thinking about patents, lawsuits, and the rest of the red tape. Thats about the time i decided that america can suck my cock and forego all the fancy ideas I come up with. Ninety-seven percent efficient cooling/heating? fuck your patnent system. Electrostatic propulsion? Yeah, just as soon as lawyers are outlawed. I have no reason to innovate because in the state of america innovation leads to higher taxation. and legal fees. and paperwork that i don't give a flying fuck about. But other than that, I'd say use lasers to vaporize the grass. Not "safe" but safe enough.

  130. Nice Laaa-aaady! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    Seeing this /. entry reminded me of that Jerry Lewis movie (don't remember the title) where he gets chased by several robotic lawnmowers. They had big rotating blades in the front, and would have been quite scary if not for all the hilarity.

    I think this was back in his Dean Martin days. Probably 60's sometime.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  131. first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    first you have to build a shrinking ray that your kids accidently get shrunk by......

  132. Innovation First Controllers by TheDefunctMunky · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've found that the controllers made by Innovation First are excellent. They are straightforward to program in C (assembly for those sadistic people) and offer a ton of control (16 10 bit analog inputs, 16 pwm outputs, 16 digital in/outs). This would be a great choice for the control system...

  133. For God's sake NO, not geese! by scrod98 · · Score: 1
    I was recently at a day camp where my daughter was staying and they had a lot of geese there. The main play field was damn near unusable because the geese produce several times their body weight in crap every day.

    Just as bad as the picture in your head...

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    1. Re:For God's sake NO, not geese! by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

      yes, goose poop gets everywhere and it's nasty and slippery. just go to any pond where they congregate and you will see the problem.

      --
      -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  134. Re:On second thought... by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No but one could upload some cool images to be cut into your lawn... Think Lawn Circles :) Hey if you can make it detailed enough.. You might even be able to make a good buck Mowing Things into peoples Lawns liek Happy Birthday ect.. or pictures (if you can get decent shading down pat...

    Could take on a whole new idea.. :) could pay for itself in no time....

    Hmm... I better run to the patent office here :)

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  135. Re:Uhhhh. Saftey w/ lasers! by RussR42 · · Score: 1
    Fire suppression?

    With these innovations, you could employ someone to handle that shit.
    Lasers are cool. What about a ridicoulous mirror system to just pan and refelect the beam around your yard? Less moving parsts. Ah hell, I'm too, uh, drunk for this. Burn your damn feet off at the ankle... worse if you pass out in the yard.

  136. Re:Simpler solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who is going to that much trouble to build something that has no brain and just stands there?

    I dunnow, why did God make Mexicans?

  137. Senior project at Texas A&M (links to pics) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked on this about a year and a half ago for my senior Computer Engineering project. It was a group of 4, and we actually made fairly good progress in a semester. The main holdup was that the guy in charge of getting the supplies took too long to order everything, so we didn't get enough construction/debugging time.

    Here is the basic construction plan we had:
    * Start with standard push mower
    * Replace front tires with "shopping cart" style wheels that can turn as needed.
    * Mount two windshield wiper (or other powerful 12v motor) on the back wheels to provide independent control and near-zero-turn radius.
    * Mount car battery on for powering of above motors.
    * Add bump sensors for detecting when front hits an obstacle (we built our own from surgical tubing and wire)
    * Add sensors across front of mower to detect cut/uncut grass. We used a series of optical sensors mounted about 2 inches above the ground at the front of the motor.
    * Wall sensor to detect when a wall (or other wall-like obstacle) is near the mower on the sides.
    * Add tip sensor to determine when mower is not near-level (being turned over by small children or leprechauns)
    * Program/mount FPGA to take in sensor inputs and control motors.

    Our basic algorithm was to keep the far left grass sensors out of the tall grass, and keep the right sensors in the grass (varying speeds of motors turns the mower left or right). We theorized that you could edge around the area you wanted mowed, then put the mower stradling this line, turn it on, and it would circle around cutting in a spiral towards the middle. Triggering the bump sensor would cause it to reverse, and then try to follow the obstacles' edge until it found a grass edge to follow. It was getting fairly complex by the end of the semester, but worked pretty well based on our lab testes. Real world tests were not as great, but like I said earlier, we kinda ran out of time.

    Here are some pics:
    Top View
    Side View

  138. Mine by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pic Started mine about 11 years ago. The mechanical platform was a roboticized Toro 4hp mulcher using a permanent magnet motor driven backwards to generate power for two beefy wheel drive servos and the electronics. Fully autonomous. Narrow beam ultrasound sweeping the forward path for semi-coherent vision. No external environment markers used except where there aren't any objects to range off of for 20 odd feet. You walk it through the lawn once and it makes an internal map of the environment and the path you chose it to follow. Then, just plop it down and hit the start button next time. Works infinitely more efficiently than the commercial attempts at *cough* autonomous algorithms the crux of which is which way to turn after boffing into the perimeter wire or an obstacle. Rev. 2 is going to go battery-powered for safety and you'll have to "show' it where the charging station is. Wish I'd had money to take it commercial.

  139. Just get a goose by iamacat · · Score: 1

    All the ones around our company do is "mow" the grass for the whole day. A lot more fun than a piece of metal as well.

  140. I'd make sure to learn about the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "law of comparative advantage" that is.

    That's usually covered in Economics 101.

    Only a fool will waste time building something which is already available as a mass-produced product.

  141. Re:On second thought... by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

    Your lawn would look like it was cut by a horde of drunken, psychotic Zen masters competing over the same sand garden.

    Dude, I'd pay extra for that.

    Suburbia sameness gets tiring.

  142. Positioning by BashDot · · Score: 1

    I am not a robot scientist, but I would think that if you were to get to the point of playing around with with mapping where the robot is at, you should probably set up 3 simple transponders that you can "ping" from the robot. This should be enough for you to get a pretty good idea of where you are at in the yard. You could possibly even cut it down to 2 transponders if you can differentiate between the two. This could also be useful for transmitting remote commands to the robot (eg: it looks like it's going to rain... back into the garage!)

    Using a system like this could also help you determine when the robot gets stuck. If the wheels are turning and we're going nowhere, then save fuel and power down.

    One could have some real fun with this stuff.

  143. How about grass-cutting ants? :) by antdude · · Score: 2, Funny

    See here. [grin] ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  144. robotfindskitten by mongolian · · Score: 1

    so how would one program this device to find kitten?

  145. If only I could afford one of these by DaKrzyGuy · · Score: 1
  146. Roomba sucks by Animats · · Score: 1
    But it doesn't suck very well.

    We have a Roomba at the Overbot shop. It's really dumb, doesn't clean well, gets tangled in wires, and gets stuck under tables with chairs. It's basically useless.

  147. Robocut by kk74 · · Score: 1

    Just wondering if you have seen this page? http://robotshop.se/micro/wwwrc_us/indext.htm

  148. pay neighborhood kid? by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be like, way easier and safer to just pay a neighborhood kid a small fee and have them do it for you? i agree mowing the lawn sucks, but it seems to me that making a homebrew robotic appliance with sharp splinning blades is a bad thing.

    alternative: plastic grass (they have really realistic stuff these days), or japanese rock-garden instead of lawn.

  149. I, for one, welcome our new lawnmower overlords by MojoReisen · · Score: 1

    Every boy wants a giant Robotic Lawnmower for a pal.

    --
    "Nothing is impossible for the man who refuses to listen to reason"
  150. Basic STAMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swedish Robotshop (a Basic STAMP reseller) toyed around with this idea for a few years. Expensive to buy as a DIY-kit, but great for inspiration! (http://www.robotshop.se/micro/wwwrc/indext.htm)

  151. Look at the commercial solution by redphive · · Score: 1

    I have been looking at the types found at friendly robotics and the way they have things going is pretty slick. It simple, and pretty efficient.

    They employ a mulching style blade that minimizes the size of the clippings, with the thought that they fall between the remaining blades and compost their way into lawn food.

    There isn't much in the way of obstacle avoidance, instead obstacle redirection. Sensors on the front are depressed as it bumps into something, it turns and then moves on.

    You define a perimeter of your cutting area with a 100m wire placed at the lawns edge. This wire provides a low power rf or some similar signal that the mower picks up on. If for some reason the wire breaks, the mower shuts down (blade spin time in 2 seconds). When the mower reaches the perimiter, it treats it like an obstacle, turns and mows on.

    Finally, the mower runs for 3 hours (the big one of the three models). For 5 minutes prior to rolling off of the charging stand, there is an audible alarm warning of the mowers impenting departure. When the mower is closing in on the 3 hour mark, it starts heading back to the charger, charging time tales 24 hours.

    So yeah, looking at these things... I would suggest some kind of 'remote control'. If the mower doesn't detect some sort of rf signal, it doesn't start rolling, allowing for a emergency shutoff. If you want to venture into the obstacle avoidance realm, perhaps hold off on that, get the obstacle redirection down first, then mod ify again, baby steps...

    Some kind of charging system is in order... try for solar, or line power, I would steer clear of gas.

    Would love to see any work you do on a project like this.

  152. Keep it simple by aitsu · · Score: 1

    I don't know how or if this can be done in practice, but this is my idea. You could just lift up the turf, lay a thin, continuous (non-oxidizing) metallic strip along the path that you want the mower to take, put the turf back and fit some kind of metal-detecting sensor under the mower so that it will be guided by the metallic path now hidden under tha lawn. It will require you to clear the lawn of stuff like stones etc., but you'd have to do that anyway if you want a nice evenly striped lawn.

  153. buy and adapt by curator_thew · · Score: 1


    Why not buy one from Electrolux (http://www.automower.co.uk/) and see if you install Linux on it.

  154. Husqvarna by dave_macleod · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have a look at http://www.solarmower.com/tech/frameset.htm Dave Mac

    --
    Any opinion expressed is also that of my employer - another benefit of being self-employed.
  155. magazine article on this in late 1980s early 90s by Splork · · Score: 1

    there was a magazine article with a project to build one of these in the late 1980s or very early 1990s. It was in something like Popular Electronics or one of the similar hobbyist project magazines of the time.

  156. As seen on Tomorrow's world 18 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was part of a team that created an automated mower demonstrated live on BBC TV's "Tomorrow's World" nearly 20 years ago!

    That design had a Z80 to provide the brains, and various sensors to detect the edge of the lawn, for safety etc, including the emergency stop that the presenter showed *live* by putting her foot in front of the mower as it was running.

    I think that I looked away assuming her foot would be cut off, since we'd told her it was a prototype and not to be trusted. Thank goodness our engineering was better than her judgement and the mower stopped as designed!

    It was a modified rotary mower as I recall.

  157. Just buy a goat by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

    And no, I'm not going to include a link in this reply, because /. readers tend not to trust URLs with "goat" in them ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  158. How about www.robotshop.now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has plenty of resources about a robotic lawnmover, and is an open project as well.
    http://www.robotshop.nu

  159. open mowing project by Escherichia+coli · · Score: 1

    An open sour.. er.. joystick project should keep your lawn cut for a while. A web camera with a wi-fi link taped on top of a relatively simple wheel controllable cutter will provide fun for a lot of casual web surfers. Even a fan club with friends and foes (probably embracing couple of neighbors) fighting for directing/avoiding the sharp teeth toward/from your tulip garden and/or pet may evolve. The growing common intelligence of caring for your lawn is hard to beat wit any AI.

  160. Good Start by MrRee · · Score: 1

    Theres a couple of complete kits out there. This one has a good programmable controller and remote that might make a good start. Granted, you couldn't use the chassis, but you could use the brains. In has a breadboard for (I think) another 8 digital inputs or outputs. It works well and should be adaptable for what you want to do.

  161. Robot lawnmower?! by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Consider the problem of fitting an ashtray to a motorcycle. It may not seem directly relevant, but bear with me ..... it'll all make sense later.

    The first, and most obvious problem is, how are you going to prevent the ash and nub-ends from blowing out all over the place? But even if you can sort that one out, then you have other problems to solve. Assuming you can make quite certain that bits of burning tobacco are going to stay well away from any inflammable fuel, then how do you put a cigarette between your lips while wearing a crash helmet -- never mind the non-trivial question of how to establish a burn and keep it alight in the equivalent of a 100km/h headwind. Assuming that you can manage workable solutions to those three problems, you still have yet another one: how are you supposed to wrap a Rizla paper around some tobacco, lick it and stick it, without taking your hands off the handlebars or your eyes off the road?

    So, those motorcyclists who insist to smoke tend to stop and dismount; roll a cigarette, smoke it at a leisurely pace, perhaps engaging in polite conversation if they have been riding with a partner; trample the butt into the floor, and maybe take a leak before roaring off again. And that is why motorbikes don't have ashtrays.

    Now, building a robot lawnmower is similar to fitting an ashtray on a motorcycle -- it sounds like a great idea at first, but there are just too many reasons, belonging to different domains, why it won't work. And the longer you think about it, the stupider the idea begins to look. For chuff's sake, if you really can't be bothered to cut your lawn, just pave over it! Or if you really must be high-tech about it, try and genetically engineer a slow-growing strain of grass that only needs cutting once or twice a year.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  162. me too!! by zarniwhoop · · Score: 1

    I have also been pondering this for a while.

    However I am leaning more towards a radio-controlled mower. This would reduce the complexities of an autonomous unit plus it'd be fun to drive (?). I am guessing that kit rc units could be modified easily enough.

    But thanks for the post - some very good ideas coming out of this discussion!

  163. BattleBots anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Safety? Why? Did nobody see Battlebots? Now just make sure nobodyy enters your back yard and start experimenting. There is nothing better than a flamethrowing lawnmower on steroids, is there?

  164. SOLAR POWER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hi Dude,

    Solar Power. Slow Moving. Goat Like. Hey if it is Goat Like, you can call is a GNU-mower. heh.

    What you need:

    A way for it to know where it is relative to the garden

    OR a way for it to find out where it is relative to where it has been, and correct mistakes.

    Either it should know preceisely where it is, or just remember how far it has gone, if it hits something, write it to a non-volitile memory.

    if you garden has some GNOMES :-) then you should end up with a hazy circle defining the obstacle after a while.

    You should plot all this in an appropriatle resolution, so 4 pixels is about the size of the mowers cutting region.

    You should then make each pixel to about 8bits, and set a value for how long it has been since it went there.

    You shoudl then process the bytes in a FOFI (yes FOFI) method, so it would contiuously loop.

    Now to get stripes, just preset the grid with:

    09a.
    18bc
    27ct
    36de
    45ef

    It will process them as 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 a b c d e f etc.

    thus going up and down.

    it will write each area it goes through as it goes through that area. of cours eyou need enogh bits for the resolution syou are looking to for the lawn.

    Solar Power!

    Else pay a college student to mow your lawn, and wash you car, and get off on her 20 yo bod, whilst helping her education! That help one of your drives, and let me tell you, your pocket will feel kinda full! :-)

    You didn't hear that from me.

    1. Re:SOLAR POWER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You will need 802.11b to send this data back to your machine, also run tthhttpd on the machine, so you can address it AND access it via the net, I haven't seen a website running off a lawnmower, so that would be geeky.

      Webcam would be nice. If however I r00t ur lawn mower box, and cut your geran1umz bi4tch then it is ur f4ult 4 n0t being l3et and patching your lawnmower.

      I don't know if a solar panel about 2ftsquare could run an x86 with linux, and a HDD, and the necessary webcam, and 802.11b.

      mmm.

      You could setup webservices to allow people to subscribe to lawny, and he could drive aroun dyour whole neighbourhood, whoring itself out and 'mowing peoples lawns'

      yeah.

      alternatively concrete over the grass.

  165. Useful contacts in the UK by riedquat · · Score: 1

    I would suggest you get in contact with the Fighting Robot Association who look after the interests of combat robot builders now that Robot Wars has finished. Their forum would be a good place to ask your question. We spend a lot of time discussing how to make combat robotics safer, and I think safety will be your first concern too, so please get in touch.

  166. Related story by AlecC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thirty years ago, the parent of a friend wanted to solve the same problem before the days of small computers. He had a nice house by the river, with a big square lawn reaching down to the waters edge. He hammered a stake into the centre of the lawn, tied a rope to the it, and tied the other end to the mower. Jam the mower throttle open, and the mower goes round in ever-decreasing circles as the rope winds round the stake. It works, for a couple of orbits, so he goes into the house to get the camera to get evidence of his cleverness. Unfortunately, the rope provides a neat rocking pressure on the stake guaranteed to maximise its chances of pulling out of the ground. When he comes back with the camera, there is a nice neat mowed line leading to the water's edge, and a pair of mower handles sticking out of the water.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  167. Mowing UDO might be a good start by maischberger · · Score: 1

    Just search for UDO on designforge

  168. Even better... by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    sometimes the low-tech approach is the best.
    Bring on the minisheep!

  169. Re:On second thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a guy who mowed text into peoples lawns. Just simple letters, nothing special. I have no idea what kind of machine he had. He did not want strangers to see it (trade secret I suppouse).

    I don't think he made much money. It was just some college dudes summer business.

  170. forget blades! by mennucc1 · · Score: 1

    I would never use blades in a robotic lawnmower: blades are way too dangerous! Nobody that I know uses lawnmowers with blades anymore, at least for a reasonable sized garden.
    The lawnmower that I use do not use blades, but a nylon (or iron) string; the cord is rotated very very fast: this cuts weed and grass, but not trees and fingers (it will injure a limb, but not cut it). see picture The nylon cord is wind upon a small spinning cylinder : the downside is that you need to unwind a new piece of the cord from time to time (in particular if it touches a rock or any hard object), but I am told that newer models would do this automatically. (actually, if you hit a rock with a blade lawnmower, I guess that the blade would be damaged too).

  171. Homebrew robotic lawnmower by garlicfarmer · · Score: 1

    Sounds like one of my dream projects (one I would get to do only in my dreams). I want a robotic garden weeder. It has to be able to either keep track of its position to within a couple of centimeters on a 4 acre field or be able to recognize a variety of crops and differentiate them from weeds. It has to be able to work autonomously, returning to some base during the daytime for charging and operating at night when there are no human obstacles. The crops are grown in (approximately) straight rows to simplify the process. If it keeps track of its position, it would have to communicate with a central computer which would keep a table of crop locations (generated automatically by the planter or possibly stored later by using the weeder in a calibration/learning mode). One method of differentiating crops and weeds could be simply size of the plant. When using transplants, the crop is automatically the largest thing around by far, so any small emerging plants would simply be wiped out. Note that gardens are frequently rough ground, so the device has to be able to climb over rocks and sticks occasionally (especially here in New England). Also, location cannot be determined simply by wheel rotation. If weed plants are chewed up, the chewing device will hit rocks or at the minimum, abrasive soil. (Sometime it's not enough just to pull a weed out. If the weed is just laid on its side, it can re-root and will remain the same size as it was, so eventually it can become large enough to look like the crop if using size determinants). It has to cost less than $5K in prototype. If the safety issues could be addressed, there would be a market for something like this among home gardeners and small farms. Could be expanded later to recognize and destroy insect pests (differentiating them from beneficial insects). Automatic fertilizing would require some sort of hopper to store the fertilizer and would significantly increase the size and weight of the device. Weatherproof, of course.

  172. we have that! by jpellino · · Score: 1

    apparently the rf fence is all over my local supermarket - all the carts have one wheel freeze up about 20 feet into the store... ingenious!

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  173. Blade Alternatives by [000000] · · Score: 1

    What are the blade alternatives?
    Perhaps fishing line used in the same way a combine harvester works and, use a metal bar as the point of contact. As the mower goes over the grass, the grass would run up against the bar and any grass that's grown over the bar, would be chopped by the rotating fishing wires.
    This would also be a great safety feature as any fingers that enter the underneath of the Robotic mower would be safe as the fishing line would snap.

  174. RC-car based robot / mower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently making one based on a 'Baja King' RC car, with a SNAP module (probably best to use small PC board these days) connected to an SD20 for servo control and a MAXIM A2D chip.

    It has sonar on servos and bumpers on back and front, plus two Sharp IR sensors each mounted on two servos for more accurate ranging and some degree of object recognition. It also has a passive IR detector to recognise the presence ofhumans/animals.

    The robot itself avoids pits and walls over 5 cm, and sends information back to a server using a WET-11. The server builds maps and does some localisation and high level task planning.

    Once safe I plan to add a motor powered version of a push mower to do composting maintenance cutting.

    However smart it is at navigating, it will be ultimately useless unless it can find its charging dock and charge itself without intervention.

    I will post a URL when more complete

  175. imo by enigmax01 · · Score: 1

    The following is a site that may help you build this robot. Using a palm pilot as the processing unit may be very helpful and inexpensive. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~reshko/PILOT/ You could also create a computer model/map of your yard and simulate the AI in the model using bruit force to find the best possible path. That way the computer can figure much of the desired path out for you. Keep in mind the heights of various parts of the terrain... wouldn't want it to flip over and create a potential health hazard. Another option would be to place small inexpensive magnets in the ground to help the guidance system. You could detect these magnetic waves to see where to or not to mow (Sort of like the new "autopilot" cars they are working on in Calif.) I do not fully agree with the slow moving idea because the point is to get the job done quickly so you don't have to worry about what could go wrong (Peace of mind). Also, would you mulch or bag... If you bag, you will have to dispose of the clippings.

  176. question concerning powering by cazzazullu · · Score: 1
    This may come as a stupid question, but did anyone ever consider really fueling their robot/computer with alcohol/gasoline? Seriously, consider this: a small alternator, a battery, a small engine running on gasoline/alcohol/nitromethane (i.e. engines used in model planes). Could this give enough power (probably yes since you can always upscale your components). How small/light could this be constructed? Just imagine your laptop/robot running on gasoline. "I get 6 miles and 120 gigaflops on one tank, sparky, how about you?" ;)

    --
    int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    1. Re:question concerning powering by wpiman · · Score: 0

      Nothing like a two stroke running inside your house to really boost the WAF factor.

  177. 1960's Solution.. by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading an old magazine 60's("Radio Constructor") that featured a solution to this- a guy had a circular lawn & wanted to automatically mow it - how did he do it? Complex electronics? no. He put a large oil drum in the center, and attatched the petrol mower by a long rope with a lenth the radius of the circle, wound around the drum. The mower is started, and as it unwinds mows a spiral pattern - then mows another spiral coming in! Bloke goes and has beer, and comes back just in time to switch the mower off as it hits the center.

    The diameter of the drum should be a bit less than the width of the mowers rotors..

    Or, just buy a goat.. :-)

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:1960's Solution.. by chiphart · · Score: 1

      ...this is exactly what my grandfather did back in the 50s and 60s. He is an amazing combination of cheap and handy, so he rigged up a motor to his push mower and tied it to a 4x4 in the center of his lawn. He'd see a few patients (he was a country doctor) and then run out to finish the corners. For him, to mow the lawn for free while seeing a few patients...heaven.

      --

      ...if I wanted to read garbage like that, I'd go to \.
    2. Re:1960's Solution.. by anderiv · · Score: 1
      The diameter of the drum should be a bit less than the width of the mowers rotors..


      Not to pick nits, but shouldn't the drum's *circumference* be a bit less than the width of the rotors? That way, once the mower has made it around one full time, there is one mower's width of rope taken off....
  178. Re:On second thought... by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

    You probably have fewer obstacles in a yard, and they probably move less frequently (trees and such rarely walk around). Just focusing on what path it would take (not propulsion or cutting or anything) you could set RF or whatever beacons around the perimeter of your lawn. Put the robot down at one corner, and have it programmed to stop when there's a barrier ahead of it, move it's body length to the side and procede in reverse.

    Imagining a tree in the middle of your yard where you'd put a perimeter around, it would end up missing part of your lawn, but nothing huge, and it wouldn't constantly go over the same section of lawn.

  179. Re:On second thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold on a minute... I think he might be onto something. I studied a great deal of entomology and comparative animal behavior in my (useless) degrees in Biology and Environmental Science and the same principles that termites use to navigate can be applied to a robot mow-swarm and can probably get about as straight lines as I usually get when mowing.

    Termites use pheromones to create trails to food sources. Read _Fuzzy Thinking_ by Bart Kosko for some ideas but I think it would be fairly easy to create a fuzzy controller that would compel robots to congregate but to repel each other when they got too close. Low power radio (1 meter range or so) should be sufficient to let the robots know where the others are. Bound your yard with an "electric fence" (buried electrical cable) to keep them from mowing the whole neighborhood and it should work... (Of course the devil is in the details.) Using a simple fuzzy mathematical model and tweaking the parameters should allow you to tune the robots to get straight lines, cool Mandelbrot-esque patterns or whatever. Probably the coolest part of the whole experiment is that your mow-swarm could actually surprise you and create patterns that you've never thought of, based on small deviations in their original placement on the yard.

    Or maybe I sniffed too much formaldehyde in college...

  180. Low-tech Solution by Cymsdale · · Score: 1

    One of my neighbors is a retired engineer. He already has an automatic lawnmowing system setup for his yard. He has a wooden pole in the center with a rope attached to the mower. He then starts the thing and walks away. As the rope wraps around the pole, the mower covers the lawn inward in a circle pattern.

    Honestly, I have not paid much attention to the details. I think he may have a system in place to turn the thing off when it reaches the center, but if so I don't know how. I just notice the thing sometimes when I drive by. Of course, this system will hardly cover the entire yard, but I'm sure it gets the bulk of the job done.

  181. There is a medical code for lawnmower injuries by Espo_SHIZ · · Score: 1

    I used to file medical insurance claims, and to my surprise I once found a medical diagnosis code (HCPCS) for "lawnmower accident". Most of the codes are stuff like leg fracture or lung cancer, etc, so that "lawnmower accident" looked strange. I guess it happens a lot. Now I foresee a new one coming: "robot lawn mower accident" .

  182. Older design to look at by mwood · · Score: 1

    Many years ago there was one called Mowbot. It had sensors to detect a buried wire at the edge of your property, something like those "invisible fence" gadgets for dogs. You could also lead it around on an electronic "leash" for fine control of trimming.

    When running freely it would just bounce off the wires at a somewhat random angle. So, no neat stripes, and some "wasted" motion going over patches already cut, but eventually it would cover the whole area.

    It used a big disc with four X-acto blades for the cutter. Very very sharp, but the single screw holding each would allow the blade to swing back mostly harmlessly should the Mowbot encounter a firm object such as your shoe.

    There are a lot of good or at least interesting ideas in the Mowbot, and it's so old that any patents may have expired.

    No, I never used one myself. Check _Popular Science_ back numbers for a writeup.

    See also an old book, _Build Your Own Working Robot_, for some perhaps dated ideas on designing autonomous vehicles for the home.

  183. I hate geese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geese are bastard animals from hell.

    On average 87 people are hospitalized from goose bites a year. They average 3 stiches a piece.

    Geese are known to carry disease. They carry ticks and mites which transmit the bubonic plague. Their bites may transmit west nile disease. Touching a goose can give you ringworm.

    When you are trying to feed them bread geese will hiss and attack because they deep and abiding hatred for humanity.

    Goose waste can transmit bacterial infection via children or restraunt workers.

    The average goose is addicted to several hard-core drugs. Geese have been known to mug old women. Geese go through unlocked cars hoping to steal things to feed their drug addiction. Geese will gang up to assault anyone they think is carrying bread. Geese love to crap on or eat anything they think you value. Geese will steal your girlfriend. Geese will jam their thumbs in your butt and then laugh like it was the wittiest joke ever.

    If you see a goose coming down the street JUST TURN AROUND. WALK THE OTHER WAY. Abraham Lincoln, Marie Curie, and Marilon Monroe were killed by geese. There is evidence that Jack the Ripper was a goose. Some people say that JFK was killed by a goose. The Salem Witch Trials were started on testimony from a goose.

    STUPID FREAKING GEESE I HATE THEM ALL.

    This post could only have come from Adam

  184. Building A Homebrew Robotic Lawnmower? by mephisto73 · · Score: 1

    Being geeky is great, but you are in over your head if you are asking these basic questions. The mower itself is a simple, slow, electric device. The commercial versions operate like a Roomba whereas they do not follow a prescribed path, but run so often you cannot tell where it has NOT been. This is due to the fact that the devices low (and considerably safer)speed cutting device is only processing an eighth of an inch of grass at a time. The constant running of the machine in random patterns helps to satisfy both the needs of the lawn (low impact, mulching, etc) and the needs of the homeowner (the lawn always appears to stay the same height, no work, etc). The machine is kept 'in boundary' by RF. You can modify an underground dog fence kit (about $60) to provide you with a boundary. I also recommend: 1. An attitude kill switch so when the thing rolls onto it's back, it shuts down. 2. Bump sensors (on the Roomba) 3. A lightweight plastic deck 4. String Trimmer for the cutting (they make extremely high quality aftermarket string that is two orders of magnitude beeter than the stuff that comes with the trimmers) 5. A toe sensor for the curious neighbor kiddies. 6. Remote control 7. Warning flags - There is no precedent for a injury caused by a robotic lawnmower - YET I actually considered a project like this, then I realized how much time it was going to take. I calculated my time, the cost of the parts, the hit to my insurance, and the ill will of my neighbors and bought a big honkin tractor. I spend about twenty minutes cutting 1/2 an acre.

  185. Radio Electronics schematics by Engdy · · Score: 1

    About a decade ago there was an article in the Radio Electronics magazine (not even sure if it's still being published!) containing schematics and assembly instructions for a robot lawn mower. Head to your library and search it out. Or, do some googling for radio electronics robot lawnmower.

    --
    Siggy Wiggy Figgy Tiggy a bana bo Biggy!
  186. There are a lot on robotics out there. by pappin · · Score: 1

    http://www.geocities.com/zs6bne/myrobotlawnmower.h tm

  187. The geek is strong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold on...
    You want to be cooped up in the basement building a robot lawnmower instead of being out in the sun cutting grass on a beautiful summer day?

    The geek is strong this one!

  188. Pushmower Style Cutter by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

    First, create a front-wheel drive vehicle capable of steering. Second, mount an old style motorless push mower (the kind that are tubes of blades with wheels on each side). Safer, Cheaper, Quieter, More efficient, less complicated. Could you ask for more?

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  189. get a GOAT by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    seriously -- why waste money on gadgets that fail -- a goat will keep your lawn trim, eats weeds first and grass last. just like bikes are faster and more reliable than a segway.

    regards,
    j

  190. Here's some ideas by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about the electronic bits, but I suggest finding a gas powered reel-type mower. It cuts better than a rotary blade type that's common and works better when the grass is short from regular cutting. You'd have to find a way to power the wheels though. I was thinking individual worm gear drive to the wheels for low RPM and high torque and zero turning radius.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  191. good example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked on this project a few years back and we had a fairly good working system when I left. The first two obstacle detection algorithms used two cameras and worked well enough that you almost didn't need a laser scanner. It used encoders and a nice GPS system for navigation. When I left they had cm level accuracy on fairways.

    automated golf course mowing

  192. Two Words: BEAM Robotics by grosbeck · · Score: 1

    Check out beam robotoics. They are simple robots with "natural" logic and locomotion. You could build a swarm of these critters with a boundry wire keeping them penned up. Actually kinda scary.

  193. Patterns.. by signal7 · · Score: 1

    I haven't been doing it robotically, but I've been mowing the lawn in patterns for quite a while now. It looks a bit nicer, but annoys the neighbors since it looks a lot more fancy than their hack attempt to just get it done in the least amount of time possible. :-)

    Now, if you're willing to do design patterns as a business and do it robotically, you might get a few bucks more than the kid down the block since you'd have something to sell to the rich folks.

    --

    --
    I have no sig.

  194. Better Yet. by chadjg · · Score: 1

    1. $20 Movie + Popcorn
    $30 Dinner
    $6.50 1 Case PBR, or whatever you like
    2. Wait 69 months
    3. Tell the little rug-rodent to get out there and do his part for the family.

    This idea is not my personal, original material, incase you were wondering. I was very good at mowing lawns too, thank you very much, and the cat damn well learned to sleep up on the porch railing. He he he...

    Simple, effective, but more expensive than the commercial solution if the kid wants to go to college.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  195. All fun and games... by Zepalesque · · Score: 1

    ...until the neighbor's kids look for their lost football in your yard when the home-brew robotic mower is hard at work.

  196. Old Problem by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    My lazy (smart) Uncle used to take a wheel rim welded to a post in the middle of the lawn with 100' of 1/4 cable attached to the rim and the other end attached to the riding mower . He would then put it in gear step off and retreat to the porch where a cold adult beverage awaited.
    the steel cable wound up on the drun pulling the mower closer every time it went aroun . When it hit the center post an arm shut off the mower. Then all he had to do was trim

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  197. Exercise left to the reader by bluehenbear · · Score: 1

    If your yard is rectangular rather than circular or square...use two posts?

  198. Re:Electric sheep - Lawndroid surely... by midgley · · Score: 1
    I'd prefer to have a Lawndroid.

    I think it would recognise grass plants, and trim them to the preset height (bit taller in the hollow please) and remove anything else - moss, daisies, fish (I live in Devon, it rains a bit).

    Inside the house, no longer having to deal with as much gardening clothing, we would find the Laundroid, a development of the automatic washing machine and the artificial nose, which prowls the house making decisions about items of clothing, and carrying them out.

  199. Re:Roomba + Mower-defense system! by m0rphm0nkey · · Score: 1

    Moomba..I love it! Screw asimovs laws of robotics, lets get to the fun stuff. Build a DEFENSE SYSTEM into the thing! Fences and no trespassing signs are there for a reason. The last thing I want is for some 12 year old with technolust to run off with 200 man hours of labor.

    I say pinchers of peril! Ok well, maybe a reasonably severe audible warning activated by the right sort of proximity sensor...but right after that definitely the pinchers of peril. I'd like to see my self propelled, electric powered, weed whacker armed, robotic mower chasing people around the yard.

    Forget the dog, forget the owner,
    BEWARE OF MOWER!

  200. Motors on the cheap... by thepr0fess0r · · Score: 1

    I find that for a task like this, motors from those "power wheels" vehicles (you know, those little motorized cars kids can drive around in) are the best way to go. They've got a good deal of torque, modest speed, and they're fairly easy to control: a pair of LMD18200s (from National I think?) will hold up just fine under this kind of load. These motors can be had surplus for like 8 dollars a piece if you remain vigilant. Even if an automated avoidance system is out of your league, you could get some walkie talkies and put you together a bitchin RC system for under 30 bucks, exempting the cost of your drive batteries. For those you could go a number of ways... I'm partial to electric wheelchair batteries, but those can get pricey new... a smaller car battery may be the best bet, wouldn't run you too much, and you could get an off the shelf charger for cheap.

  201. safe blade by 1vw · · Score: 1

    Electric fences use the high voltage arc's to cut grass ect that touches the fence. Not a fast way to cut the grass, but might make for a safe blade. If it only arc's once every couple seconds you won't get fried.

  202. Ye Gads! How about some suggestions?!?!? by moorley · · Score: 1

    Someone asks a sincere question, that's not out of bounds (Look around ye, Slashdot, see the banner? News for Nerds?!?!?), and all I see is humor and derision!

    Buy a GOAT?!?!?! What is that?!?!?!

    Excusing fetish humour, and obvious jibes (and there are *MANY*) the point of the exercise is not to revolutionize anything its to "play" with technology. Just like those folks who modify cars, build their own homes, or do whatever makes their boat float. Its about building it yourself so you learn from the experience.

    Is he going to be the next Einstein? Maybe. But irregardless of the outcome I think it's cool to work on these projects.

    How many of us have drooled over a homebuilt idea that turned out cool? If you didn't answer yes, you may need to change your homepage away from Slashdot! <BULLHORN> Sir! Step away from the computer and nobody gets hurt!</BULLHORN>

    Explore, Invent, Enjoy, (Be Safe!)

    So more power to ya man!

    <SOAPBOX>

    Now for constructive comment. You need to decide how expensive you want this thing to be. The more intelligent it is the more expensive it will be.

    If you choose more expensive, powerful hardware (like mini-itx boards) then you will get more wiggle room to work around problems and flaws. If you choose more embedded hardware then you are going to do more coding and figuring to lock the hardware into doing what you want it do by design.

    Myself I'd go for the mini-itx boards. You get reusable parts if the project goes astray. I've also seen a wireless RS232 bridge, but nowadays you could probably just hook it up with WiFi.

    The biggest hurdle I see is handling the mapping and autonomous functionality. Making it stay within bounds all within a cost effective package. So in quick summary, some recommendations.

    1: Choose reusable hardware. Don't buy one use embedded electronics, tend for reusable pieces like mini-itx, WiFi, standard batteries or modify and exhisting lawn mower. You can use these in other projects after you've worked through some prototypes. After several prototypes you may then decide to buy the pieces for a "finished" lawn moyer. Up to you.

    2: Check with other groups, mailing lists, or local robot enthusiasts. You've probably heard it before but one of these folks may either have the idea/resource you need, or give you an idea where to go.

    3: Design,Design,Design. Before you start tinkering you should have thought out 2-3 designs of how you want the system to work. Not talking 3D CAD drawings here, napkins will do, but if it doesn't look like it will work in theory, it won't work in practice.

    4: Be clear to yourself why you are doing this. This is not a timesaver, this is not effective use of time. This is tinkering and a hobby. The pure joy of it. By the time you are done you will have no excuse for how you spent your time that will work for anybody (Wives, Neighbors, and Friends). You did it because you wanted to, any other reason you will only lead to humour and derision. That will make you regret the project and the time you've spent. Keep your humour about you.

    Don't know why people have these attitudes but that's just the way we humans be. It's always easier/safer to doubt than to believe I guess.

    Good hacking to you!

    Note: I realize I did not directly answer his question but after looking through the highscores I wanted to step up with some answers/responses. I've not built one, but I've been looking at some similar projects myself. Hope my thoughts are helpful in some way.

    --
    "Don't fear death... fear not living..." -me :)
  203. Do not get the two confused! by GreyOrange · · Score: 1

    Sheep trim grass. Goats eat grass roots,(aka the expanding deserts in Africa due to goat herding)!

    --

    Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________