Slashdot Mirror


You've Got PC

freitasm writes "Geekzone is reporting on the AOL Optimized PC, a 2GHz Intel Celeron PC with 256MB RAM and 50GB ATA-100 HDD. It'll cost US$299.99 from Office Depot stores, with a commitment of 12-month AOL subscription. More information on AOL Optimized website." There's also a Reuters story.

362 comments

  1. basic... very basic. by ack154 · · Score: 5, Informative
    $299.99 + (12 months * $23.90/month) = $299.99 + $286.80 = enough to buy a decent PC without having to go with a full year of AOL (it also == $586.79 for those of you adding at home).

    Though I suppose it is actually on target, if someone only has $300 and can afford the $24/month payment, it might be a simple way to get a PC a little "cheaper" up front. Just too bad it has to be AOL.

    Full list of features:
    # Processor: Intel Celeron Processor 2 GHz
    # Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (pre-installed)
    # Memory: 256MB RAM
    # Hard Drive: 40GB, ATA 100, 5400 rpm
    # Optical Drive: 52x CD-ROM
    # Network: 10/100MB Ethernet
    # Modem: 56K v.92
    # Ports: Four USB 2.0 Ports (two front, two back)
    # Monitor: 17" CRT monitor (minimum 15.7" viewable)
    # Printer: Lexmark Color Inkjet Printer
    # Peripherals: Standard Multimedia Keyboard, Two-button Wheel Mouse, Speakers
    # Additional Pre-Installed Software: AOL Office suite of spreadsheet, word processing and presentation software; AOL 9.0 Optimized Internet service, the latest version of the AOL and AOL Latino services
    1. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised if it has a PCChips motherboard, can anyone confirm?

      That's a poor choice of CPU. Comparable with an Athlon XP at 1.2GHz. They'd have done better to have put a Semprom in there, as the name sounds spunky enough for their target market.

    2. Re:basic... very basic. by Duncan3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Millions of people need SOME kind of dialup anyway.

      Now they can get what looks to me like a very good "mom and dad" PC for $300 WITH A MONITOR. No harm in that.

      Granted, other ISP's are cheaper.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    3. Re:basic... very basic. by danamania · · Score: 5, Funny

      # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_< and WTF keys

      Most important feature, that.

    4. Re:basic... very basic. by gptelemann · · Score: 1

      The story claimed a 50GB hard drive. Which is correct?

    5. Re:basic... very basic. by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

      Er, but...the main reason someone would buy a PC like this is to get on the web. So whether they pay the $ to AOL, Earthlink, Bellsouth, Comcast, etc. is really irrelevant to the total cost.

    6. Re:basic... very basic. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're not just getting a PC, you're getting a PC and a 12-month dial-up service. If you're going to evaluate the real value of this deal then price up a similar spec PC and include a 12-month subscription to a ISP on par with AOL in terms of service, etc.

      Also, remember that this is the sort of deal that's put together specifically to attract novice PC users. People who've never owned a PC before can buy a machine and not have to worry about where to get an internet connection, etc: it's an all-under-one-roof solution that's perfect for people who know what they want to do (surf the internet, send email, type the odd letter) but have no idea about what to buy when they flick through a magazine or go to a superstore.

      In those terms, I don't see what there is to complain about.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:basic... very basic. by proj_2501 · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA, the article summary is wrong.

    8. Re:basic... very basic. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the main reason someone would buy a PC like this is to get on the web.

      You need a minimum of 256M, 2GHz CPU and 50G hdd just to get on the web?? Tell me, how much did you pay that Cray that can go on the web *and* do word processing as well (!!)?

      Sheesh, I don't what planet you live on. I use a P1-133 as a secondary computer just to go on the web in my electronics lab and browse technical PDFs.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    9. Re:basic... very basic. by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Things Obviously Wrong:

      1. 256 MB. Chalk up an extra $50 to maintain sanity and upgrade to 512. AOL is a notorious memory hog.
      2. CDROM-What, no CD-R? No DVD? They're dirt cheap! Yet another thing for the owners of this pc to buy. Chalk up $75 for both.
      3. The printer. Ugh. I bought a Compaq a few years ago and it came with a 'free' lexmark color printer. The damn thing drinks ink. Then it throws it away. Then it gives it to special interests. Chalk up $100 for ink cartriges.
      4. Honestly, who doesn't use an optical mouse these days? That's more $$ right there when the wheel breaks down or clogs because AOLers don't know how to fix it.
      All in all, this is a lousy deal for which one could get a far better PC with far better internet for likely less money.

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    10. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get a shitty computer from Evil Satan for the same price, without the contract.

    11. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      woah woah.. calm down professor, all the guy said was that the reason to buy this box was to web surf.. he didn't say shit about minimum requirements..

    12. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $300.00 is quite pricey for those low spec's.

      I sell "book" pc's for 245.00 every day with better than those specifications and I include a monitor!

      XP home OEM is dirt cheap to us re-sellers (I get it for $35.00 a copy... yes with legit stickers and no DELL or Compaq is not on the book or sticker...)

    13. Re:basic... very basic. by darkain · · Score: 1

      considering that in this area (seattle/tacoma), there is a 100% free dial-up ISP that doesnt even require you to sign up... well, that beats 12 months of paying for AOL.

      next, consider that things like gmail are free, yahoo mail is free, AIM is free, MSN is free... the list keeps going on and on. and just about everything else AOL has, is available elsewhere for free somewhere on the internet as well.

    14. Re:basic... very basic. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're going to evaluate the real value of this deal then price up a similar spec PC and include a 12-month subscription to a ISP on par with AOL in terms of service

      Yes okay, let's do that:

      AOL box:

      1 x piss-poor PC: $299
      1 x full year of AOL: $286.80
      = $586.79, as the parent poster kindly calculted

      Similar offering, not AOL:

      1 x piss-poor PC, but probably better than AOL's: $350
      1 x full year of any cheapo dialup ISP, but probably better than AOL: $180
      = $530.00

      So AOL worth an extra $56.79? I think not...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    15. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ.. this box is for people that don't know any better that really can't afford a decent Dell or whatever..

      and AOL will run perfectly fine with 256MB, shit my parents have been running it for years with 128 (the ignorant bastards)

    16. Re:basic... very basic. by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "a ISP on par with AOL in terms of service"

      Well, the $10 a month ISP my grandmother uses now is a lot better than AOL in terms of service. Do you know of any cheaper ISPs I can use with the abysmal service of AOL I can use for an accurate comparison?

      This sort of thing fizzled out in the past. Remember the big money off for agreeing to commitments to ISPs? I don't think this will help AOL any more than it helped MSN or CompuServe.

    17. Re:basic... very basic. by ack154 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, but after the AOL payments, it's almost $600. You can easily get a PC with monitor under that right now. However, the only benefits are that you pay less up front, and get an ISP, but still...

    18. Re:basic... very basic. by ViolentGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody said anything about minimum requirements. Those are all low end "modern" parts.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    19. Re:basic... very basic. by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      In those terms, I don't see what there is to complain about.

      In the bitter world of slashdot, there is always something to complain about.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    20. Re:basic... very basic. by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't use an optical mouse. There is nothing wrong with my ball mouse, and I know how to clean it.

    21. Re:basic... very basic. by bonkedproducer · · Score: 4, Informative

      My mother uses JOI internet for a whopping $6.95 a month and consistantly gets better connection speed, never a busy signal, better e-mail, and faster support and service than she ever got when she was an AOLer, so what is the point here?

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    22. Re:basic... very basic. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but to put together a commercial computer -- meaning you can't use used parts, as there's no steady supply, and you need to use parts that will be in production for at least the next year for swapping out broken stuff -- it would cost the same to use those stats as to lower them.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    23. Re:basic... very basic. by Celt · · Score: 1

      Well your talking a average of 70MB ram is use with AOL 9.0,

      AOL Communicator is another matter :)
      I once compared it with Mozilla's mail client and it uses 3 times the RAM!
      It has less options then Mozilla's client but its still a step in the right direction.

      Slowly AOL seems to be moving away from its client software, with aoldialers you can use dialup on mac & PC without the need to start the whole client which is a good thing.
      In the UK atleast you can use DSL without the AOL client at all either using a standard DUN connection or using a router, although support wise AOL UK will only support the router connection (fully support both Netgear & Speedtouch models).

      All in all it could be a much worse service, I just wished this new Fanfair software (beta.aol.com) used the Gecko engine instead of MSIE's, oh well...

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    24. Re:basic... very basic. by seaniqua · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While you can get a better PC than that for under $600 right now, you miss out on one of the main reasons that the "great unwashed" are buying these PC's to begin with: internet. One of the main reasons for a family that doesn't already own a PC to get one is because internet access is becoming more and more of a convenience/necessity of life.

      In an inexperienced user/internet-only situation, this looks to be a good solution. You can buy another PC for a similar price, but then you would have to add ISP charges on top of that. Plus, AOL is a name recognized by the public, which means that Grandma and Grandpa will trust them more.

      --
      That's right, I read at +2 and post at +1. Not even I care what I have to say.
    25. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh. You mean the system is very basic. Sorry - thought you meant the user.

    26. Re:basic... very basic. by Tongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is the target audience is not likely to know about these services. Most people that would buy a PC like this barely know what "online" means let alone what an ISP or GMail is. They just want to go to a superstore and get someone to show em what they need to get online with the least amount of hassle. I serisously doubt someone who buys one of these would even have to set up a dialup account.

    27. Re:basic... very basic. by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      I use a nice ball mouse, too, you insen...

    28. Re:basic... very basic. by AftanGustur · · Score: 1


      # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_

      Shouldnt there be a "me too" button also ?

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    29. Re:basic... very basic. by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      They can't possibly be using Joi internet then. I should know, I used to work there. They are quite possibly the worst ISP I've ever had the (dis)pleasure of working for.

    30. Re:basic... very basic. by whovian · · Score: 1

      5. 10/100 MB ethernet. Why does a novice need internet, seeing as it's likely this is a first computer?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    31. Re:basic... very basic. by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      One thing everyone should note is that it appears all the "cheapo" ISPs share the same pools of modems all across the country. This means the modem service will probably be identical no matter the company (unless someone can enlighten us otherwise). The differences between ISPs, anymore, is solely with their customer service, privacy policies, webmail, etc. I used Highstream.net for a while, because they had a good privacy policy (I never used their webmail, but getting only one spam at that address in a year is decent proof they didn't sell out).

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    32. Re:basic... very basic. by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_

      Shouldnt there be a "me too" button also ?


      <AOL>
      ME TOO! I Agree!!!!
      </AOL>

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    33. Re:basic... very basic. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is that AOL has the marketing. Whether or not a geek thinks it is "worth" it is irrelevant. A lot of people may buy this, and they may all regret it, or they may not. Geeks simply can't compete against AOL.

      There are geeks that are willing to assemble or refurb a better computer for less, but they simply can't get the word out, even locally.

      Frankly, I really don't care to "spread the workd" because I don't get paid to do that. If I do get paid to do that, then I am likely selling something. Unfortunately, a lot of people see AOL as the cuddly giant and the local geek as a distasteful character.

    34. Re:basic... very basic. by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1
      I got a 2.8 Intel Celeron eMachine, DVD, CD-RW, 80gb HD, 17" Monitor and Lexmark Printer for about $480 after rebates. I would not consider it a "piss poor PC", but it was certainly a good deal and does what I need it to. There was a slightly lower end model for $400 that included everything else.

      BTW, people that know nothing of computers like AOL. I hated the damn thing, but after trying to show my grandmother how to use outlook express and various other internet apps, I eventually told her to just keep AOL because she had been using it for a while and was comfortable with it.

    35. Re:basic... very basic. by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      AOL's 24 hour support might be, especially since it will cover Star(or Open)Office too.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
    36. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did RTFA.. that's how he was able to cite a fact from TFA. Do you know what RTFA stands for?

    37. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ask the wrong quesion. Why does a dialup user need an ethernet port?

    38. Re:basic... very basic. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I don't see what there is to complain about

      Don't read /. much, do ya?

      --
      -Styopa
    39. Re:basic... very basic. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      You mean kind of like this?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    40. Re:basic... very basic. by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Two out of those three articles give specs stating 40GB hard drives. The article summary given by the submitter is wrong, as are your definitions of the words 'cite' and 'fact'.

    41. Re:basic... very basic. by tobar+mersa · · Score: 2, Funny
      You need a minimum of 256M, 2GHz CPU and 50G hdd just to get on the web??
      No, that's simply to run Windows
      --
      This sig space intentionally left blank.
    42. Re:basic... very basic. by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      $75 for a CDR or DVD-R? Crap...you got ripped off CD-R = $25 Single layer DVD-R = $65 both from newegg.

    43. Re:basic... very basic. by pHatidic · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the feature where if it detects that no one has used the mouse in the last 10 minutes then automatically shuts down the computer.

    44. Re:basic... very basic. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Does one have to actually use the AOL? If not, then the $585.80 isn't too terrible a price to pay for a new computer.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    45. Re:basic... very basic. by clickster · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's compare on the basis of service. First try and call AOL to get them to fix something that has gone wrong with their software. Now, after 30 minutes on hold, getting dumped back into the hold queue twice by unscrupulous phone reps,then getting a guy on the phone who has had a few weeks of basic computer training and has to hit an average 7 minute call time to keep his job (QoS doesn't matter at AOL, only call times - worked there a long time ago) thus affording him just enough time to give you a BS answer to get you off of the phone, THEN tell me they have great service. Now, are these also the people that you want in charge of fixing HARDWARE problems on your computer? I didn't think so.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    46. Re:basic... very basic. by chickygrrl · · Score: 1

      Nice, but I'm holding off until they give me a "kthxbye" key.

    47. Re:basic... very basic. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeh, but you need to clean it, so it needs maintance.. which is a 'fault'.

      and you can't use a ultima cloth map as extremely comfortable mousepad with a ball mouse.

      anyhow, the thing why the aol machine is missing all these things is that basically they're the only things you can save a few bucks when building a computer.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    48. Re:basic... very basic. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      What about RTFA, IANA, IIRC, FAIK, YMMV, OTOH, and frist psot

      Sorry for all the capital letters. Slashdot says it's like yelling.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    49. Re:basic... very basic. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      But you can get very good dial-up internet access for under $10/month. That means for the PC, you can add $14/month right on the cost of the hardware.

      DSL with a 256k up cap is available in the mid-20's. So you're paying DSL prices for dial-up with this plan.

    50. Re:basic... very basic. by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      why would you buy an emachine?

    51. Re:basic... very basic. by katarac · · Score: 1

      The internet/e-mail is probably the only motive a novice HAS for getting a first computer. That and typing letters.

    52. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      were 4 to clik get pron??? kthxbye!!1

    53. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the A/S/L key.

    54. Re:basic... very basic. by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 1
      1 x full year of any cheapo dialup ISP, but probably better than AOL: $180

      Or you could just support your friendly neighbourhood freenet. If it's anything like mine you can give any donation you can afford.

    55. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I seem to remember this from somwhere.....oh yeah:

      http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20020929

      Apparently "great" ideas never die =P

    56. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hes a moron.

    57. Re:basic... very basic. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Hmm I spent the same and have a Athlon 2500+ running at 2300MHz, 1G of RAM, 120G of hard drive (although i had 3 40giggers sitting around, so that was free...), MX440 (I don't game), etc.

      Building your own computer is always a way to get a cheap computer.

      --
      My other car is first.
    58. Re:basic... very basic. by mdemirha · · Score: 0

      I dont know how you come up with the $350 price. When I try to build the configuration above, I get a much higher number:
      NOTE: I chose the lowest prices from PriceWatch.com Processor: Intel Celeron Processor 2 GHz = $60 Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (pre-installed) = $199 Motherboard: $40 Memory: 256MB RAM = $35 Hard Drive: 40GB, ATA 100, 5400 rpm = $31 Optical Drive: 52x CD-ROM = $15 Network: 10/100MB Ethernet = $10 Modem: 56K v.92 = $10 Monitor: 17" CRT monitor (minimum 15.7" viewable) = $74 Printer: Lexmark Color Inkjet Printer = $40 Peripherals: Standard Multimedia Keyboard, Two-button Wheel Mouse, Speakers = $20
      So, the price of a computer like this will be around $530. Not $350. Now you do your calculations on top of this price, you will see that you loose around $150 by going with a cheaper ISP!

    59. Re:basic... very basic. by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Here's a better system for $374.97
      Good ISP for parts of Canada This totals $35.40/yr
      Or get any ISP that's $9.95/month = $119.40/yr

      Grand total of $494.37 (374.97 + 119.40), it's much less then this AOL deal and a better computer.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    60. Re:basic... very basic. by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      Dude, there's better deals out there. CompGeeks often runs some killer deals. I got my dad a 2 GHz Pent IV (IIRC) for around $300 + $20 for shipping. Yeah, that one comes with a moniter, but you can get one of those on there too for less than $50. I think I'll just skip the AOHell.

    61. Re:basic... very basic. by jabberwocky_rt · · Score: 1

      I bought a similar system, for my daughter, a few months ago:

      Intel celeron 2ghz
      512mb ram
      50gb hdd
      4 usb
      "useable" onboard sound and video
      56k modem
      ethernet card
      Red Hat 10 installed
      Keyboard/mouse

      total cost: $150 at Fry's

      granted this didn't include a printer or monitor... however, you can buy a 17" monitor for around $100, winxp home for around $100 (ish) and a ok printer for $50-100

      so total cost...
      150+100+100+50 = $400

      and... I get to pick my ISP, or put it on my network and share my connection.

    62. Re:basic... very basic. by ncc74656 · · Score: 0
      # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_< and WTF keys

      Most important feature, that.

      They did that two years ago...have a look at this if you don't believe me. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    63. Re:basic... very basic. by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      WTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTF

      Oops... Sorry, key got stuck.

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    64. Re:basic... very basic. by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      Some people may not dig a 90-day warranty on a computer though.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
    65. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...I remember going to a CSU Surplus auction and picking up a lot of six monitors, perfect 14-17 inchers for...uh...what was it? A DOLLAR. ONE UNITED STATES DOLLAR. Of course, I made $79 on them by selling them. =]

    66. Re:basic... very basic. by Frank+Grimes · · Score: 1
      Millions of people need SOME kind of dialup anyway.
      Have you ever used AOL? there is a lot of overhead on the connection that tends to slow everything down. AOL doesn't use the normal OS-level ppp conection. A $12/month isp is a much better connection than $24/month AOL.

      I wouldn't reccommend AOL for anybody.

      --
      CfkRAp1041vYQVbFY1aIwA== RV/hBCLKKcSTP5UFK3kqsg==
    67. Re:basic... very basic. by really? · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But, for many people AOL is the only option.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    68. Re:basic... very basic. by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      Throw in a monitor, keyboard, mouse, and speakers. They are small, but they add up.

    69. Re:basic... very basic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether or not a geek thinks it is "worth" it is irrelevant. A lot of people may buy this, and they may all regret it, or they may not.

      What insight! People may read your message, and they may agree with you, or they may not. They might reply to it, or they might not. In fact, they may even obliquely insult you... or, of course, they may not.

    70. Re:basic... very basic. by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1
      You ask the wrong quesion. Why does a dialup user need an ethernet port?

      Easy - so you can sell them an upgrade to broadband more easily.

      Chris

    71. Re:basic... very basic. by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in quite honesty, I think it'll sell really good. Most people nowadays want a computer that works and lets them get online. With this having AOL preinstalled and Windows on it, it doesn't get much easier for all of our grandparents.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    72. Re:basic... very basic. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      So AOL worth an extra $56.79? I think not...

      Tell that to my parents. They had AOL for as long as I can remember (back when it fit on a floppy!). The service sucked, and I hated having to use it, but it was all we had. My parents never used the Internet for more than email.

      When I went to college, they finally got Comcast's broadband service. My dad figured that $20/month for an extra phone line and $25 for AOL (plus the hassle of dial up) would be more expensive than the $25/month initial offering.

      What do they use their 3Mb line for? AOL. I tried to get them to use Firefox, but was told that it 'didn't work.' Then an upgrade of AOL fried Internet Exploder. So now they use AOL over a broadband connection and pay $75/month. Just so my mom can have her own email address.

      The moral of the story: Non-geeks don't understand why not to use AOL because they don't care or are used to it.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    73. Re:basic... very basic. by JimC93SW2 · · Score: 1
      I have always shared the geeky bias against AOL (probably going back to early versions that were sometimes difficult to remove), but I recently picked up PC support for a new client. She is about 60 and has had a Gateway PC running WindowsME for about 3 years. She started out on AOL, moved to a local neighborhood (mom and pop) ISP and recently moved back, because they treated her better than the local guys(!).

      When I got to her place the first thing I saw was a message from Norton Antivirus, "Your virus protection is 1297 days old, you should run LiveUpdate", and I thought of running out the door, but it turned out that some kind tech at AOL had helped her download and apply all the Windows critical patches. I got her Norton upgraded to Internet Security 2004 and surprise, she had NO viruses or anything else.

      Most of my other dial-up users have MSN and they ALL got Blaster last year - which is what led each of them to ME!

      I'm not saying that this is the typical experience, or that AOL is for everyone, but for people who DON'T want to become SysAdmins maybe their "Internet Appliance" approach is the way to go

    74. Re:basic... very basic. by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the deal, not the specs. However, feel free to snap up one of those cheap powerhouses to do all your quantum physics work. When you get that Nobel Prize maybe you can spring for a RAM bump.

      sheesh yourself...

    75. Re:basic... very basic. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      True, I suppose since I had a lot of stuff laying around (I still have 4 monitors...) that saved me some cash. That's what's nice about the x86/PC platform. Stuff from many years ago still works fine today.

      (That can't be said for, say, macs. Try using your ADB stuff today. Or your ADC monitors. Of course the A in all of those stands for Apple, which should clue you in. Thankfully today's macs use standard stuff. USB/DVI/IDE/PC2700 RAM, etc. )

      --
      My other car is first.
    76. Re:basic... very basic. by decepty · · Score: 1
      But, for many people AOL is the only option

      Who? As long as you have a phone line (which is a requirement to use AOL, too) you can access any number of ISPs. Sure many people may think AOL is the only option, but those are typically the people who can't tell the difference between RAM and HDD space and think that windows = computer.

      ("My windows was acting strange, so I unplugged it")

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    77. Re:basic... very basic. by really? · · Score: 1

      Err ... people who live in an area not serviced by other ISPs. Just because you and I are lucky to be able to chose amond a few providers, that's not the case everywhere else. Also, how about people who move around a lot? International travellers? etc, etc.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    78. Re:basic... very basic. by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in some cases, but you have to have a lot of the stuff lying around, which I don't have. My friend that used to buy parts said it wasn't worth the time to build a low-end computer from scratch because after you add all the expesnses together, you could buy a prebuilt machine for the same price or cheaper. You also have a greater chance of hardware conflicts occuring opposed to a prebuilt, tested system. Its a good route to go if you have the time to debug conflicts, spare parts lying around, and the know-how, otherwise I would recommend spending $400 for a out-of-the-box setup.

  2. werd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a good deal for grannys and the like.

    1. Re:werd by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      This sounds like a good deal for grannys and the like.

      Really. I have an elderly aunt, whom in December I discovered had a PC and was dialing into the internet, downloading email with Outlook, etc. I knew this was so wrong on so many levels it made me quietly very angry. A better way would be a PC which is totally locked down and doesn't let you run anything but plug ins and verifies with the user each file which is being saved to disk. Her level of sophistication meant she was going to be hit by worms and virii, probably never knowing it until one actually trashed her computer.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. Slashdot Daily Ad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Subscribers got to read this ad early.. I feel like my day is now complete.

    1. Re:Slashdot Daily Ad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With several hundered people trashing it in the comments, I'd say AOL didn't get their ad money's worth.

  4. ....and? by Megaweapon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No offense or anything, but why is this on the front page?

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:....and? by vuvewux · · Score: 1

      Yeah - what gives? I don't see Linux mentioned anywhere in the article.

      --

      Let's not forget that one can hate his government, but love his country.
    2. Re:....and? by nanojath · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're selling links now like FARK.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    3. Re:....and? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because michael's an idiot?

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  5. Wasn't this tried already? by Hanna's+Goblin+Toys · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As I recall we all got the system, cancelled the contract and hacked the P.C. Sounds like this time we do the same thing, but we don't have to hack it.

    Any ideas on how to make their contract unenforcable? I'm thinking pseudonym + PO Box personally.

    1. Re:Wasn't this tried already? by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Any ideas on how to make their contract unenforcable? I'm thinking pseudonym + PO Box personally.

      That's fraud, they could come after you. What you do is have a neighborhood kid sign the contract. People under 18 can't be parties in a legal agreement. That way, if they don't check up on it, it's their fault for getting into a business deal with a minor. However, it's still really underhanded and I don't recommend it as AOL's got a crack legal team that you might find yourself dealing with.

    2. Re:Wasn't this tried already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to pay via Credit Card if you order this system from AOL. I'm willing to bet that there is a similar deal at OfficeMax.

      [tinfoil_hat]One more step towards outlawing cash.[/tinfoil_hat]

    3. Re:Wasn't this tried already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >People under 18 can't be parties in a legal agreement.

      There is an exception to that rule; if the contract is for a minor who has emancipated himsef and is forming the contract for a necessity, then the contract may be enforceable.

    4. Re:Wasn't this tried already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND parents can bel help liable for criminal acts of their chidren too.

  6. 'cuz it's worked so well in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haven't we seen this done at least three times in the past? And hasn't it always been pay cash, give false info, walk away?
    It's not a damn cell phone you idjits.

    1. Re:'cuz it's worked so well in the past by John+Bodin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The system is not stocked in store but will be shipped to what ever address you give them at the time you sign up for the AOL service. Which is done in the store.

      --
      John
  7. no thanks by justforaday · · Score: 0

    Great! So once I've factored in the cost of the crappy AOL service that I have no interest in using, the thing will have cost me 600 bucks...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:no thanks by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Don't be stupid. This product is intended for people who would already pay a monthly charge for an ISP and consider AOL a viable option. Obviously, no one would consider using AOL would consider buying this product.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ill buy it just to watch that zany WAOL.EXE go all crashy on me as im trying to retype the url letter by letter because aol's default browser directed me to some assclown site.

      WAOL... kinda like saying WOW; only after a couple of lobotomies.

      p.s. its all made out of the aol cd material, as they own 94 percent of all the cd material on earth

  8. $299.99! by T-Keith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't they send them in the mail for free like the CDs. Seems like a marketing strategy change to me.

    1. Re:$299.99! by canoe_head · · Score: 1

      CD's in the Mail? Man, and all these years I thought they were coasters.

    2. Re:$299.99! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ACTUALLY THEY ARE I JUST G0T 0NE BUT IT SEEMS T0 BE MISSING THE CAPS L0CK KEY AND ALL PUNCTUATION KEYS

    3. Re:$299.99! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRUE AND MY AL0 C0MPTUER HAS N0 SPELING CHEKER F0R TEH INTARWEB 0R TEH 0FICE P0RGRAMS HOW ABU0T U THXBYE

  9. welcome to commoditisation by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    $299 for a PC, heavily subsidised by an AOL subscription.

    This is like a cellphone plan being applied to home PCs.

    I wonder how much of that $299 is for the Windows license? This is linux's opportunity in my mind...if PCs become throw-away items (e.g. equal to or less value than a console system) at what point do the corporate masters figure 30-40% of your capital costs going to Microsoft doesn't make much sense?

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:welcome to commoditisation by moojuece · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      RTFA it doesnt come with windows, it runs a "Sun desktop os" and AOL office....which sounds quite a bit like another SUN offering of open office

    2. Re:welcome to commoditisation by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the FA, but the AOL website linked says it comes with windows xp.

    3. Re:welcome to commoditisation by jhunsake · · Score: 1, Informative

      How about reading the AOL website, dipshit.

      "Systemax AOL Intel Celeron 2.0GHz / Microsoft Windows XP Home / 17-inch CRT / 256MB DDR / 40GB HDD / CD-ROM / Lexmark Ink Jet Printer / 1 Year Warranty / Desktop PC"

      or further down,

      "Of course, the AOL Systemax PC runs on the award-winning Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system for incomparable performance and stability."

      or even further down,

      "Specifications Operating Systems Windows XP Home Edition"

    4. Re:welcome to commoditisation by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Desktop PC are already throw-away items for alot of companies. Thats why they lease them.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:welcome to commoditisation by Pirogoeth · · Score: 1

      Um... right...

      From the AOL site:

      "Of course, the AOL Systemax PC runs on the award-winning Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system for incomparable performance and stability."

      --
      Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    6. Re:welcome to commoditisation by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      I agree, though I bet the Windows license is freaking cheap.

      I've talked about AOL using Linux bootable CDs before. The user wouldn't have to install anything. Basically like a Knoppix CD with an AOL logon icon on the desktop. Seems like it would rock Window's world.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    7. Re:welcome to commoditisation by TheRiddler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AOL users are not linux's opportunity.

    8. Re:welcome to commoditisation by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder how much of that $299 is for the Windows license?

      60$ is the OEM price (per each) for a small distributor (couple thousand PCs) I have no idea what AOLs price point would be but 40-50$ sounds like a good guess.

    9. Re:welcome to commoditisation by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No, companies lease computers because it has tax advantages.

    10. Re:welcome to commoditisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The target group for these types of systems, is the same target group for WebTV units.

      Most people out there want a computer that comes in a box, remove it from the box, plug it into the wall, surf the internet. They don't want to hear that they need to 'setup/install/configure/etc' anything. And for those people, this is a good deal.

    11. Re:welcome to commoditisation by moojuece · · Score: 1

      yes, it appears i was a bit quick in my reading....misreading at least, read the 'powered by sun' in the software section and then the discription of the office suite in a different section and made a hasty assumption

      it happens

    12. Re:welcome to commoditisation by amber_of_luxor · · Score: 1

      RTFA it doesnt come with windows, it runs a "Sun desktop os" and AOL office....which sounds quite a bit like another SUN offering of open office

      Why don't you reread the article, for the first time?

      From http://www.aolcheckout.com/applications/searchtool s/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1032073

      Of course, the AOL Systemax PC runs on the award-winning Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system for incomparable performance and stability. And this fantastic computer is housed in a sleek, stylish fully equipped black Micro ATX tower case with 250-Watt power supply.

      Amber

      --
      Wind Beneath Thy Wings
    13. Re:welcome to commoditisation by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "the AOL Systemax PC runs on the award-winning Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system for incomparable performance and stability"

      Incomparable indeed...

    14. Re:welcome to commoditisation by sheddd · · Score: 1

      You may be right. but I'd think a AL distro that'll do browsing, email, and some office apps might be an attractive buy for computerless folks (or those who want an additional pc).

      Dumb it down, hide the console, make the ui for the few apps consistant and intuitive...

      For a really casual internet user simply 'keeping it runnung' is a pain with windows/IE. You need a 2 hr class every year to keep a box 'halfass secure'.

      There are so many frustrated casual users these days... I bet someone marketing a 'it just works and keeps on working' pc would have a chance... I've seen quite a few folkd buy new pc's not because they needed more, but because the software on theirs was hosed (spyware, etc.).

      Well I guess apple kinda does that, but they're pricey. Cheap hardware for non demanding apps + free distro might have a market; throw in free updates at no cost; bandwidth is getting cheap.

      p.s. I hate AOL

    15. Re:welcome to commoditisation by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I suspect one part of the problem for AOL is that there is content that doesnt render on anything but MSHTML/IE right now (including content that, for various reasons, is worth $$$ to AOL) and they would need to fix the content in order for things to work.

  10. Worst pun Ever! by Ape_the_Dog · · Score: 0

    They can call it a Home CompAOLter (I meanth it!)

  11. 50 GB hard drive to run AOL? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know that their connection software is bloatware- but isn't this a bit on the ridiculous side? Then again- it's been a while since I priced hard drives- perhaps the 10GB models are no longer available?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:50 GB hard drive to run AOL? by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      I have trouble finding a HD smaller than 20GB at my local shops.

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
  12. 1st post and evil AOL by oktokie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow~! 1st post!!!

    AOL is evil as ever. Who needs their expensive per xkbps download stream compared to high speed dsl or cable!!??

    Not to mention that it's very very very hard to cancel AOL account.

    Cancel it and call them next day, and call next day to check on them...99% of time your account is still well and alive!

    What does one need to squash AOL account to death effectively? If you had any bad experiences in cancelling AOL account, please post here!!! :P

    oktokie

    1. Re:1st post and evil AOL by riptide_dot · · Score: 1

      What does one need to squash AOL account to death effectively? If you had any bad experiences in cancelling AOL account, please post here!!! :P

      My grandfather tried to cancel his AOL account by dying, but that didn't work either. Looks like we might have try an exorcism now.

      --
      I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
    2. Re:1st post and evil AOL by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      My grandfather tried to cancel his AOL account by dying

      Look, condolances and all, but really you shouldn't do that to me when I'm drinking :-)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  13. Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $299 gives you an entry level PC. Looks like its enough to surf the web with and do most day to day stuff. Surprised by the lack of DVD drive, but maybe they figure that most people are interested in download and burn? Certainly not something for Doom 3, but then again I'm not surprised. You also need to be subscribed to AOL for one year. This really sounds like a similar approach as that used for mobile phones.

    Reading the FAQ, I see mention of 'AOL Office Writer', 'AOL Office Calc' and 'AOL Office Impres'. Searching the net reveals nothing on the programs, though the closest I could find were matching names in the Open Office suite. Other than the names I wonder if they are one and the same?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      Surprised by the lack of DVD drive, but maybe they figure that most people are interested in download and burn?

      I think they are just trying to get the "I want to surf the web and write email" crowd. I think the majority of those people wouldn't want to watch a DVD on their computer. Hell, they probably don't even know that it's possible.

      Most of the people in this target group probably own stand alone DVD players for their TVs anyway.

    2. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you go to the FAQ on the aol page it tells you that it is an office product from sun microsystems, so they obviously liscensed staroffice, and put their name on it.

    3. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by 5amTheButcher · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's the full excerpt - seems to be StarOffice:
      What software is included with the system?
      Along with AOL 9.0 Optimized, the system comes with AOL Office, powered by Sun.

      What is AOL Office, powered by Sun?
      This is a full suite of productivity tools that can open, edit and save documents in a variety of formats, including Microsoft® Office. AOL Office contains four main applications: AOL Office Writer (for text documents), AOL Office Calc (for spreadsheets), AOL Office Impress (for presentations) and AOL Office Draw graphics).

      What is AOL Office Writer?
      AOL Office Writer is a word processing program that helps you create many types of documents such as reports, greeting cards, letters and more.

      What is AOL Office Calc?
      AOL Office Calc is a spreadsheet application that you can use to organize and manipulate data that contains numbers, such as a household budget.

      What is AOL Office Impress?
      AOL Office Impress provides tools to help you create attractive presentations and slide shows. You can use Impress to show presentations on your computer or print them out.

      What is AOL Office Draw?
      AOL Office Draw lets you create simple and complex drawings. You can also insert tables, charts, formulas and other items created in AOL Office programs into your drawings.
      AOL pushing free office software... I wonder if they are providing tech support for it as well. You could buy one AOL OPTIMIZED PC for the office, install StarOffice on all the computers, and then abuse AOL Tech support for all your MS -> Sun compatibility problems...
    4. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they are providing tech support for it as well. You could buy one AOL OPTIMIZED PC for the office, install StarOffice on all the computers, and then abuse AOL Tech support for all your MS -> Sun compatibility problems...

      I don't need an excuse to abuse AOL tech support.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Entry level and AOL Office == Open Office? by sydres · · Score: 1

      actually it has a free agp slot, so throw in a 100 dollar(us)nvidia geforcefx 5200ultra and bang doom3 will run on it albeit only at lower res. and settings but it will run

  14. why, oh why? by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the love of Christ, that's all we need is more ignorant AOL users on slow dialup connections. Frankly, I'm quite surprised that AOL hasn't gone the way of many other services (Prodigy, MSN, etc.) that abandoned their proprietary software for simple internet access.

    Maybe if they encouraged use of standard Internet, the IQ of the average netizen wouldn't decrease every time AOL signed up a new user. It's a real problem when users call tech support because they can't get to a website because they type the domain in the AOL search bar instead of an internet browser. *sigh*

    1. Re:why, oh why? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand the evolutionary niche the AOL parasites occupy- their purpose is specifically designed to lower the IQ of the net by reducing the digital divide- this is simply the next logical step and I'm surprised they didn't do it earlier (like about 5 years ago when EMachines and PeoplePC did.....)

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:why, oh why? by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      I think this problem spills over into other areas besides net access. Just consider education today. In an effort to "pass" more students, we've simply lowered the bar instead of educating them.

      Isn't this the same thing that AOL is doing? They're making every effort possible to allow everyone to participate; unfortunately, the "dumb" people don't stay with thier menial jobs while the intellects sit behind a desk. We all have to share the same internet whereby my actions affect thiers and thier actions affect mine.

    3. Re:why, oh why? by Meostro · · Score: 1

      It's a real problem when users call tech support because they can't get to a website because they type the domain in the AOL search bar instead of an internet browser.

      That sounds like a failure of technology, not a problem with the people... I want this, give it to me, don't make me pick "search bar" for half of what I want and "internet browser" for the other half. Just make it work like the Google Toolbar and everyone would be happy campers.

    4. Re:why, oh why? by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a failure of technology, not a problem with the people...

      And yet AOL continues to thrive. Personally, I haven't tried AOL since something like 9 years ago and can't vouch for anything. I sure would like to know what they offer that no one else can that attracts so many users. I sure could use some extra traffic to my site.

    5. Re:why, oh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, there will always be incompetent end users. I know, for example, an otherwise very reasonable person who not only has an AOL account, but also has broadband AND a dialup stand-alone ISP. Now the dialup and broadband combo happens to be nessecary in this case for esoteric technical reasons, but as of yet I have been entirly unable to convince this person to GET RID OF THE AOL ACCOUNT. For a lot of users, it's not based on any logic or reason. "I know how to use AOL, all my friends use it, we can use the buddy lists" etc etc. People don't want to bother learing how to use IRC or downlaod Firefox. They want it all in one compact user-friendly package. One screen for internet, email, stocks, chat, and all the rest.

    6. Re:why, oh why? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true- that's exactly the same thing AOL is doing. The only difference is WHY they're doing it- to make profit. Where government just wants more undereducated voters to decide between the hypocritical rich white christian running for president and the hypocritical rich white christian running for president.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:why, oh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have been entirly unable to convince this person to GET RID OF THE AOL ACCOUNT...it's not based on any logic or reason

      People don't want to bother learing how to use IRC or downlaod Firefox. They want it all in one compact user-friendly package. One screen for internet, email, stocks, chat, and all the rest.

      sounds like you answered your own question

    8. Re:why, oh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of Christ, that's all we need is more ignorant AOL users on slow dialup connections.

      I don't see the problem... isn't it better to keep them on slow dialup connections than to put them on broadband?

    9. Re:why, oh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...that's all we need is more ignorant AOL users on slow dialup connections..."

      As long as they stay on AOL, they're not bothering me.

    10. Re:why, oh why? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I'm quite surprised that AOL hasn't gone the way of many other services (Prodigy, MSN, etc.) that abandoned their proprietary software for simple internet access.

      Actually, they are coming out with a program called AOL Dialer, which does just that. I'm not sure I really understand the point of it though when the AOL client offers internet access through third-party programs. I'm not really sure why people use AOL anymore outside of chat because almost everything else just dumps you to a web page.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  15. Monitor and printer. by blanks · · Score: 1

    some info. Systemax AOL Intel Celeron 2.0GHz / Microsoft Windows XP Home / 17-inch CRT / 256MB DDR / 40GB HDD / CD-ROM / Lexmark Ink Jet Printer / 1 Year Warranty / Desktop PC With them including the monitor, printer, and xp, this is a fairly good deal. Yes you end up having to pay the 25 a month for aol, but most people would be spending this anyways on some type of internet conection or another.

    1. Re:Monitor and printer. by kayak334 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, I just priced the equivalent on pricewatch

      Celeron 2.0: $60
      256MB DDR: $33
      40GB HDD: $31
      52x CD-ROM: $10
      Lexmark Printer: $29
      17" CRT: $74

      Total: $237

      Note that total doesn't include XP license or a 1 year warrenty. You make a good point about people spending the money on an internet connection anyway, but if this is their 2nd PC and they are just connecting it to an existing network, it becomes much cheaper without AOL involved.
    2. Re:Monitor and printer. by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      Crap, I forgot the price of the motherboard... Oh well.

    3. Re:Monitor and printer. by eschwinge · · Score: 1

      Forgot about printer, speakers, keybaord, mouse, and case. As well as the mb.

    4. Re:Monitor and printer. by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      Well, I did include the printer in the first estimate...

      As for keyboard, mouse, speakers, motherboard, and case...

      Keyboard is $4 for a USB one
      Mouse is $4
      Case is $24 with a 300W PSU
      speakers are $10

      New total is $279.

    5. Re:Monitor and printer. by hsoft · · Score: 1

      you still didn't mention the MB.

      --
      perception is reality
    6. Re:Monitor and printer. by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      DOH

      Ok, it's been a bad day. :)

  16. Will AOL still... by tuanjim_2001 · · Score: 1, Funny
    be sending the unlucky user a dozen AOL cds a month?

    From the department of redundancy department.

    --
    "If a quarter is two bits, then a dollar's a byte." -R Deric Miller
  17. 50GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and 50GB ATA-100 HDD

    How did they get ahold of 50GB disks? That's not a standard size. Perhaps it's a 60GB disk with 10GB of pre-installed AOL crap?

    1. Re:50GB? by sm8000 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about that. It's a typo in the blurb. The link says 40GB, 5400rpm.

  18. Antithesis by nlawalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here it is, the exact antithesis of the Linux vs. Windows story about a half hour ago, and the reason that "Linux vs. Windows" is not a reality yet. Plug it in, turn it on, and you're on (a poor imitation of) the Internet.

    1. Re:Antithesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concidering this is an aol pc using aol for internet access they why would it be even remotely difficult for them to port thier software over to linux and use that as the underlying OS? It's using staroffice for office apps, which already run on linux, and seems like they are using some sort of aol desktop that comes up on boot, which should be easy to do in linux.

    2. Re:Antithesis by kmmatthews · · Score: 1

      Except that had they ported thier proprietary app to linux, they could've slapped redhat or fedora on the boxes and saved themselves the cost of an XP license.

      --
      feh. stuff.
    3. Re:Antithesis by nlawalker · · Score: 1
      Even though it wouldn't be difficult, there's absolutely no reason to, when windows offers all of it's compatibility, plus all the ActiveX controls and everything else to make that thing as user friendly (read: junked up and flashy) as possible. Sure, it might be easy on Linux, but why bother?

      Besides, to the disinterested, "Linux" is scary sounding, and "Windows" offers the comfort of familiarity.

    4. Re:Antithesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this same thing can EASILY be done under linux.

      quit trying to spread bullcrap.

      Hell I can do this under QNX, make the OS sit on a CF card inside and write only and now the home user cant screw it up nor is their any possibility of viruses.

      PLease, get a clue.

    5. Re:Antithesis by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      um.. turnt it on and plug it in is a recipe for disaster. especially on 'full' dialup where you have absolutely no chance of downloading the patches before you get rooted by some worm.

      besides, they could provide such experience easily with linux too. beyond that it would get trickier.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  19. Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Suite by cbowland · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article: "The AOL Optimized PC also comes bundled with the AOL Office suite, a version supplied by Sun. This suite of productivity applications consists of: AOL Office Writer, AOL Office Calc and AOL Office Impress." This is a nice step for Open Office in terms of exposure to Windows users.

    --

    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
    Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

  20. MS Tried This Before Through Best Buy by geomon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And other outlets. You bought a rock-bottom priced PC and you were obliged to use MSN for 3 years.

    After calculating the high cost of MSN service versus using a local ISP, you could have spent the difference in the contract price and bought yourself a really nice PC.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:MS Tried This Before Through Best Buy by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      That MSN PC must have been a hard sale. I overheard a salesman at Radio Shack trying to convince his latest mark even with the added fake "shopping spree" money, and it wasn't working at all. "But you pay less up front!" "But it's like $400 over the next three years! I think I'll pass."

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    2. Re:MS Tried This Before Through Best Buy by geomon · · Score: 1

      That MSN PC must have been a hard sale.

      The promotion lasted about a year, maybe less.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  21. Great! by GP · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it come pre-loaded with spam? Because if not, no sale, bucko.

  22. R.I.P. I-Opener by RatBastard · · Score: 0

    A cute, if not grossly underpowered little computer.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:R.I.P. I-Opener by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      Still got mine from the developer program. I had it hooked up to the CueCat barcode reader and was setting it up so it would track all items in the kitchen and generate grocery lists when items are depleted. I wanted to go a step further and xfef the items on hand with a recipe database so you could quickly figure out what you could make with what you have and also determine what you need to buy to satisfy the requirements for a given recipe.

      But alas, I got bored and now the little sucker is collecting dust in a closet.

  23. the future is obvious.... by Tactical+Skyrider · · Score: 1


    how long till we start seeing these emblazened with the AOL running man in our mailboxes?

    "Honey! The new AOL computer is here!"

    "Oh good, now we can finish this beowulf cluster..."

    --
    In Soviet Redmond, software programs you!
    1. Re:the future is obvious.... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Same link... but boycotting the much derrided "IT" colour scheme, and attempting to whore karma en the process.

  24. AOL Optimized by christbe · · Score: 1

    AOL Optimized ? With a "Me too" key ?

    1. Re: AOL Optimized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get with the times - now it's "Me to"

      =)

  25. This is GEEKzone?? by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'

    Unspecified error
    /i_utils.asp, line 29



    You call this geekzone?

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:This is GEEKzone?? by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

      Tell me about it. Access as a web back end?!?! Only a moron, not fit for building web sites would use *JET* as a back end!

  26. with a commitment of 12-month AOL subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how expensive AOL in the US is, but if the prices in Europe are anything to go by than this offer is actually quite expensive.

  27. Re:Monitor and printer. + more info. by blanks · · Score: 1

    Link to pictures of machine, along with many details about what you get. http://www.aolcheckout.com/applications/searchtool s/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1032073

  28. DO NOT PAY FOR INTERNET SERVICE! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 4, Funny

    As Confucious Say:

    If you pay for month of AOL, you give yourself net access for month.

    If you buy neighbor cheap wireless linksys router and offer free setup, putting your MAC on it and retaining usr/pwd, you give yourself net access for life.

  29. Services cost more than hardware by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So. We've reached the point where the software is increasingly becoming free (beer and freedom), and now the hardware is increasingly becoming so cheap that it becomes the after thought in a transaction. The services part of this deal (12 months of AOL) is "worth" just about as much as the cost of that PC.

    Free software. Almost "free" hardware (throw-ins to a deal). Free wireless access. How long before we see ubiqituous computing? I guess the bigger question is how long before we see a PC included in a cereal box instead of those DVDs I've seen advertised on the boxes of Fruit Loops (or whatever it was)? "Hey! Check it out! This box contains a coupon for a free PC! (just send in 20 box tops, plus $39.95 shipping and handling)"

    1. Re:Services cost more than hardware by writertype · · Score: 1
      I guess the bigger question is how long before we see a PC included in a cereal box instead of those DVDs I've seen advertised on the boxes of Fruit Loops (or whatever it was)? "Hey! Check it out! This box contains a coupon for a free PC! (just send in 20 box tops, plus $39.95 shipping and handling)"
      You write for Wired, right?

    2. Re:Services cost more than hardware by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1
      Please allow the grammar nazi to offer a suggestion. The word that you seek is commodity.

      We've reached the point where software and hardware are becoming a comodity. Everybody knew it would happen. Neal Stephenson predicted this in his book In the beginning was the command line, and that wasn't even an insightful book.

      We will see free PCs in cereal boxes. We will see 'good enough' free software. That scares companies such as Microsoft. It is the reason that everybody is jumping on the "services" bandwagon.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    3. Re:Services cost more than hardware by gnovos · · Score: 1

      I guess the bigger question is how long before we see a PC included in a cereal box instead of those DVDs I've seen advertised on the boxes of Fruit Loops (or whatever it was)? "Hey! Check it out! This box contains a coupon for a free PC! (just send in 20 box tops, plus $39.95 shipping and handling)"

      Hey, wow, that can be done if you think about it... 100 box tops at maybe $6~$10 a box... defintily doable.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  30. Re:coincidence? by Mateito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy now, pay later.

    If its not coming out of your pocket today, its cheaper.

    People don't think long-term when making purchases. That's why banks can sell consumer credit at high interest rates with low repayments over rediculously long times.

    People joke about "Wogs and Cash", but the concept of never going into debt for a non-incoming generating purchase has a lot going for it.

  31. Re:Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Su by vuvewux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Are you sure it's a good idea to be exposing mainstream users to software that's still in its infancy? Once they have the idea that Open Office isn't any good, they'll probably stay with the idea - even after it's improved to Office 97 quality.

    --

    Let's not forget that one can hate his government, but love his country.
  32. Re:The Racial Target by Rie+Beam · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The computers will come configured with a simple desktop with large icons that send users to specific areas of the AOL service or applications loaded on the computer. They can also be preconfigured for Spanish language speakers."

    Say it. You know you want to. You know it's coming. The best case mods. Ever.

  33. System needs to be designed better by abkaiser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Regarding the 256MB of RAM...

    I still can't figure out why today's PCs are still shipping with 256MB as the standard. Windows XP behaves much worse with 256MB versus something like 512MB.

    It's like when I purchased my car a few years ago. With like 1000 miles on it, it handled horribly in snow and bad weather. I thought the car was designed poorly, until I realized it was the tires. I had a very important part of the package slowing everything down.

    My point: Who cares if it's a 2gHz CPU? With 256MB you'll be paging to that 5400RPM drive too much to notice the benefit.

    1. Re:System needs to be designed better by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      As of about the 6 months ago, it was the same situation with Macs. I think they upped the minimum memory to 512.

      Perhaps if the windows system requirements recommended 512 MB it might make a difference.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    2. Re:System needs to be designed better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I still can't figure out why today's PCs are still shipping with 256MB as the standard.
      Because most Linux distros run quite well on 256MB ram. I run a Linux distro on a PII 450Mhz, 256Mb ram, 9Gb HD and my system outperforms my sister's P4, 512Mb, 80Gb WindowsXP system all the time.

      > Windows XP behaves much worse with 256MB versus something like 512MB.
      Ya think? Could this be due to the WindowsXP OS being nothing but a useless bloated virus/trojan/worm/malware/spyware magnet?

    3. Re:System needs to be designed better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that's one of the reasons I didn't like XP. I tried replacing 2k on one machine with it but it really dragged. Windows 2000 runs just fine with 256Mb. Hell I really don't see a huge difference between 256 and 1Gb if you don't have a huge number of apps open.

  34. Why is this news? by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    Are the submitter/editors trying to make a point that a PC is available for Walmart has been selling PCs for under $300 for quite a while now. Those with Windows preloaded routinely cost about $298.00 or similar (without a monitor, mind you), and the ones with Lindows sell for about $20 less.

    The specs are similar or even higher in some cases, and they don't ship with the crippled Celeron processors. I'll take an AMD processor over the yucky Intel Celeron processor any time.

    Sorry, but this story reads more like an advertisement than a story.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Why is this news? by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      Yeah, sounds like a pretty bad deal, when you factor in the cost of AOL. I just bought a Great Quality brand commodity PC last month at Fry's for $180. It came with Lindows preinstalled, and had specs only slightly lower than the system they're describing in the article.

      Those with Windows preloaded routinely cost about $298.00 or similar (without a monitor, mind you), and the ones with Lindows sell for about $20 less.
      Really? I have a hard time understanding the economics of that, since a Windows license surely costs the OEM a lot more than $20. There's no way to do a similar comparison on the Fry's machines, because the lowest-end commodity PC they sell with Windows on it is actually significantly better hardware than the ones they sell with Linux.

    2. Re:Why is this news? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I have two of the Microtel desktops from Walmart ($199/ea). They are buzzing along perfect with Mandrake on them. They are nothing more then what you find in a typical white box maker, standard parts like an MSI MB with a lot built onboard, WD HD, mid level memory, LG CDR etc..

      What I find odd is Microtel is also selling 1 and 2U rack mount servers at Walmart.com also. I would love to see an article and some photos of those things running in an IT or business monthly rag.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  35. You have got!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    That annoying phrase is not proper english. One can not "have got" something.. I word "got" does not belong in that statement.

  36. Office Depot? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    I thought WalMart was the official outlet of cut-rate PC's. Office Depot may work around cities, but it sure isn't going to get the rural areas, for that matter not many people visit Office Depots, unless it's office/business related.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Office Depot? by tepples · · Score: 1

      for that matter not many people visit Office Depots, unless it's office/business related.

      Will this AOL deal draw parents into Office Depot stores to buy school supplies for their children?

  37. Aren't those terms mutually exclusive? by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

    AOL Optimized? Oh shit - the peg just broke off on my cognitive dissonance meter.

    1. Re:Aren't those terms mutually exclusive? by g00z · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's even funnier than you think.

      For those that aren't aware, this whole "optimized" craze is a reference to something real evil that AOL has been doing for years: having dial up users connect to proxy servers that compress the living fuck out of any image requested from a web page.

      Sound like a good idea, no? Make all the images smaller in size so pages load faster. As a friend of mine put it, "Doesn't AOL realize that people like to look at porn?"

      If it was some light compression it would be one thing, but images look like something my cat hacks up on the floor after getting in the garbage once AOL "optimizes" them.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  38. Enforcement method? by pla · · Score: 1

    Since they plan to offer this in retail stores, where you can realistically pay cash, any idea how they plan to enforce the subscription terms? Or will this turn into another NetPC(? The similar deal MSN tried a few years ago) fiasco, where they end up losing huge amounts of money because no one actually follows through with the subscription?

    Though, it really doesn't look like they stand to lose all that much. For the machine they offer, I expect $300 comes pretty close to their actual costs. For less than the total contract (just under $600), you could get a better-equipped eMachine, or even a Dell or HP.


    (And yes, I RTFA, all three of them).

    1. Re:Enforcement method? by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but you also get internet service. That is at least $120 a year if you count the cheapest provider. These PC's aren't geared for anyone who frequents this site. This idea was meant for people who don't have a PC and can't afford to drop $600 on one. Instead, like cell phones, you pay over time. Yeah, eventually they'll end up paying more, but that's the same with any contract of this type that extends to many other businesses.

    2. Re:Enforcement method? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Since they plan to offer this in retail stores, where you can realistically pay cash, any idea how they plan to enforce the subscription terms?

      Other than by shipping the machine to the street address that receives the AOL bill?

    3. Re:Enforcement method? by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      When I used to work at a major computer retailer, there was a similar deal with Compuserve. Basically, you have to pay with a credit card, check, or some other method that allows financial tracking in order to get the benefits, or provide a SSN to let the store do a credit check. This provides a solid lock on who you ARE, not an address or anything else. You really can't fake that without breaking some major laws and stealing someone else's identity.

    4. Re:Enforcement method? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Since they plan to offer this in retail stores, where you can realistically pay cash, any idea how they plan to enforce the subscription terms? Or will this turn into another NetPC(? The similar deal MSN tried a few years ago) fiasco, where they end up losing huge amounts of money because no one actually follows through with the subscription?

      I can't RTFA... but my guess would be you have to shell out $600 or so for the system, and get a $300 *rebate* when you sign up for the AOL subscription, which would include a $300 cancellation fee. At least, that's what any *smart* company would do.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  39. AOL Office suite? by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice at the website it says it comes with "AOL Office powered by Sun"? Is that a special version of StarOffice? It would be cool if it was. I don't want to speculate though.

  40. Reminds me of the old Q-Link trick by g00z · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not that there is anything new to the whole "Get a serious discount on hardware if you get a subscription to [fill in blank] online service", but for some reason this one is interesting coming from AOL, since back when they we're Quantum Link (The old commodore 64 online service back in the 80's) they did a similar thing.

    Back in the Q-link days, not to many folks had modems or could really afford them, so Q-link's hook to get you to sign up with them was that they would offer you a heavily discounted 300 baud modem when you signed up for Q-link. This seems like a no brainier these days, but back then it was really something because most online services like Playnet, GEnie, Compuserve, etc all charged you a setup fee AND charged you like $30 for their software.

    So, like I said, not that this is new, it's REALLY not new for AOL.

    Man do I ever still pine for the days of Q-link and Club Carribe.

    --
    "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  41. Isn't this going to by bob670 · · Score: 1

    choke out the cheap Linspire/Lindows boxes now? Damn, another year with no Linux on the desktop!

  42. Fallout by Nuttles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fallout from this offer may very well be the annoyance of techies everywhere. If the target audience are the people who have yet to buy a home computer then a lot of those people will be pretty much clueless with it. So it will follow in a lot of cases, these people will download or otherwise get viruses galore and/or adware. Since these new people only spent what was it 299 on a new computer, they aren't going to want to pay some tech 60 bucks an hour to fix their computer. Their tech friends will be used and abused. We will be called in to fix their problems. If the problem is software and we fix it for free than all is right with the world. The fallback on fixing a computer once is that forever more that person can say that, I think what you did 6 years ago is screwing up my computer now. Also, there is a hardware issue. These computers have the cheapest possible hardware, parts are going to die in them a lot. Well, back to the poor techie that got stuck fixing there computer. If you find out that lets say their harddrive is pooched, then they will ask how much it will cost. You will tell them and they will give you the look, like I told them that they have to hand over a years salary to fix it, then they will say well, could it be this or is there a way I can get by not using this right now...I can go on

    So my assertion is cheap PCs are only a headache for techies. Any techie who finds out that someone has one of these type of computers, run run away, very fast even

    Nuttles
    Christian and proud of it

    1. Re:Fallout by dykofone · · Score: 1
      This solved most of my problems with that.

      My mom got it for me as a joke, but I started wearing it to family reunions and it actually did help out quite a bit.

    2. Re:Fallout by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I long ago quit trying to help those who didn't have a clue. It's cold I know but what Nuttles wrote sounds so much like what I went through back in the late 90's that I'm convinced it's the only way to go. I've pretty much wittled it down to just family members (Who I've mostly pushed to Macs so that's no big deal) but I won't touch anyone elses computer. Not for the classic "Buy you lunch sometime", not for money, not for anything.

      My last one was in 2000 and it was a simple come over, install Windows ME (Ugh) and walk away. I spent almost a year coming over off and on to fix minor things and then I said "That's it, I'm done".

      Lost a "friend" (think "friendly leech") but gained my freedom. Now I say "You should get a Mac" and leave it at that.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    3. Re:Fallout by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Absolutely right.... but this AOL PC is hardly the first part of this problem! The consumer PC market, as a whole, is causing these issues for techs everywhere!

      Not only are people expecting to buy a complete system for under $500, but then they don't understand why the phone-in support is so poor, with people answering the phones who can barely speak English, and waiting times of up to 2 hours on hold.

      Just recently, I was asked to upgrade a hard drive in a person's PC. The machine was only identified by "PeoplePC" logos all over it, so it was obviously part of one of these PC + net access bundle offers from a few years ago. It took us nearly an hour of web searching to positively identify it as a particular model of Toshiba mini-tower, and then to locate an updated BIOS that would work in it - so it could recognize the larger size IDE drive we wanted to put in it.

      Perhaps worse yet, it's difficult to charge a reasonable labor rate to repair and upgrade people's computers when the original price on them was so low. They still need the same help you'd give anyone else with issues like virus/spyware removal, training, and whatnot - but they strongly resist paying "almost as much as the computer!" for you to come out on-site and spend a few hours doing it for them.

      I've been asked before why I think people have no big issue paying an auto mechanic a labor rate of $85/hr. - but moan/groan about even $50/hr. for a PC. Well, imagine if new cars sold for under $1000 each.....

    4. Re:Fallout by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      The other way to look at it is that this could be a great boon for anybody who can figure out a way to charge a fair price for sensible customer service.

      Think about it: a $1 per minute 900 number manned by people good at communicating (not necessarily techies) who can easily explain what error messages mean and how programs work. Or a drop-in "tech class for dummies."

      It's not that people won't pay to get something fixed. It's that they don't want to pay what they perceive as a lot to be talked down to.

      Incidentally, if you're the "tech friend," make sure you let people know that you're on the clock when they bug you to fix their PCs.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:Fallout by Electrum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been asked before why I think people have no big issue paying an auto mechanic a labor rate of $85/hr. - but moan/groan about even $50/hr. for a PC. Well, imagine if new cars sold for under $1000 each.....

      If new cars sold for under $1000, then you wouldn't have to pay a mechanic $85/hr. Why not just buy a new computer when it breaks?

      Because cars aren't like computers. The value of a car is the car. The majority of the value of a computer is the data on the computer, not the computer itself.

    6. Re:Fallout by subtillus · · Score: 1

      Same here,

      Nowadays I tell people, buy a mac or don't complain when it doesn't work. You want cheap, you'll get cheap and all that comes with it.
      Cheers,
      -S

    7. Re:Fallout by sparkz · · Score: 1

      My wife bought me that one. Some people take offence when they see it, but (about) half of those understand when I explain that my wife bought it. (Also Christian and Proud) "Let him who boasts, boast in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 1:30-31)

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    8. Re:Fallout by sparkz · · Score: 1
      I (grudgingly) de-virused a church member's PC a while ago, expecting nothing but thanks - and got 2 bottles of quality wine in exchange. He made a point of giving me the reviews that went with each bottle, too.

      Shame I'm not a connoisseur - tasted alright, though :-)

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    9. Re:Fallout by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone who pays a tech guy to fix their computer anyway.

      Of course, everyone I know comes to me for help, and takes me seriously. Unless it's hardware. In which case, ooohhh.....it must be that movie i recorded onto there which makes the DVD drive make a grinding noise, I've installed bad software on there and that's why it randomly resets (including during POST), and not a bad PSU.

  43. advertisement spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    this is hardly a news story

  44. Re:Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Su by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

    Infancy!?! StarOffice was available about 6 years ago! And, I'd hardly put Office 97 above it today.

  45. Re: your Sig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Using FireFox .93:

    http; http# http] http[ http'

    all result in http://www.microsft.com

    This does not happen with Mozilla

    Looks to me like somebody somewhere is having a quiet laugh.

  46. What an offer! by Akimotos · · Score: 1

    Buy this crappy threesome (provider + OS + computer) for nowhere near $600

    And as a special bonus we will provide you with an endless supply of spam, virusses and spyware.

    Believe it or not, this offer will surely keep you off those dangerous streets for the next few years! Wouldn't it be nice if you neighbor went out to purchase one? Oh yes....

  47. Re:Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is, though I have to admit that I shiver and my heart begins to race like mad when I read AOL Office Writer, AOL Office Calc and AOL Office Impress.

    Lord have mercy on us the end is nigh!

  48. No, it costs $587. by Animats · · Score: 1, Interesting
    No, it doesn't cost $299. It costs $587, and they throw in an AOL disk.

    This looks like a way to unload a glut of small CRT displays. CRT displays smaller than 17" now have negative value. Try to sell one.

    1. Re:No, it costs $587. by goldspider · · Score: 1

      If you're going to sum it up like that, at least be fair and mention that it comes with free Internet access.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:No, it costs $587. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This looks like a way to unload a glut of small CRT displays. CRT displays smaller than 17" now have negative value. Try to sell one.

      Did you read the fucking article? (n/m this is /.)

      It comes with a 17-inch CRT, which is rather decent of them.

      17" Non-Interlaced Black SVGA Monitor We've added the perfect monitor to accompany the incredible Systemax AOL PC - this 17-inch non-interlaced black SVGA. Boasting 1280 x 1024 maximum resolution, .27 dot pitch and unlimited display colors, this outstanding monitor delivers brilliant colors, sharp contrasts and exceptional text recognition. Its handsomely appointed, durable construction is the ideal complement to your brand new computer!

      Fuck no, that comment isn't interesting.

  49. aol pc by bendsley · · Score: 1

    who gives a shit?

    --
    Alcohol & calculus don't mix. Never drink & derive.
  50. Re:The Racial Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This helps me recall an NAACP outburst last year, about Coca-Cola marketing "not-as-fresh" wares (though apparently still as safe as the usual) at a reduced (80-90% of original) price to low-income neighborhoods.

    It is `wrong' on many levels, but in order to accept that, you have to deal with the "They don't have to drink it anyway" argument among others.

  51. Re:Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Su by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

    Open Office isn't any good? My mom, who I have to go up to tell her how to read a CD-ROM with pictures on it repeatedly, finds Open Office better than Office 2k. For the typical home user, Open Office can be better and easier than Office.

  52. Buy whatever's cheap by rdunnell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The manufacturers probably aren't making too many 10GB drives these days. So, you get a bulk lot of what's cheapest which is probably somewhere in the 30 to 60 gig range these days for a cheap IDE 3.5" hard drive.

    1. Re:Buy whatever's cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10-to-1, these hard drives, and the other components, have enough endemic flaws (I'm thinking of the aptly-named Quantum "Fireball" series here, which HP bought up cheap to stuff their Pavilions a few years back) that they will collapse with high probability within two years (or even one).

      But what does AOL care anyway? They're going to bill you for 1 year of service _whether or not your computer can use it_. It's actually in their (short-term) interest to have fewer operational computers...

      1) Buy cheap, breakdown-prone computers.
      2) Sell X of them to low-income families with a yearly service contract.
      3) Provide service for YX computers, while enforcing the contract for all X.
      4) PROFIT! (as long as you don't spend over $(K*(Y-X)) on possible class-actions and (non-)service techs, where computing K is left as an exercise.)

    2. Re:Buy whatever's cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's obviously supposed to be Y < X.

  53. Dear God, Why? by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it just me or does this seem equivalent to signing away your soul to Satan?

    I do tech support for HP. AOL uses their own drivers to connect to their network, and also block off the Properties page of their connection. Thus, we cannot enable the Windows XP firewall, so God help someone who hasn't patched their machine (luckily I can get around this by installing Norton Personal Firewall, which is usually included with our machines). I've also heard that if you want, AOL will sell you a firewall for $3 extra a month or something. So to sum up: Block free included product, sell own (probably inferior) product.

    Not to mention that AFAIK their entire technical support division is stationed in India, and I think they have a 3 minute call length limit or something. Whenever people call me and say they were referred to us by AOL, I roll my eyes and ask what AOL actually did before referring them to us. 90% of the time, they did NOTHING. They didn't have them click on anything, they didn't check any settings, and they most certainly did not reinstall their own software. "It's a problem with the modem." "It's a problem with the computer." I've actually heard from customers where they had to hand up on the AOL tech because they didn't take the referral to us and he actually started yelling at the customer! And this service is worth $20+ a month?! God help the person who buys this PC and is RELEGATED to these people...

    Please, if you use AOL, consider switching to another provider. You're worth more than what they give you.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Dear God, Why? by g00z · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here is an interesting account of why AOL uses such truely BIZARE drivers to connect to the network (among other weird AOL things) that I found on usenet a while back while doing research into only playnet software:

      Brian Heyboer writes:

      >I can't tell you for sure, but I suspect they are afraid it will give
      >away some of their security systems that are also used in the AOL
      >software. Remember, there was a lot more on the Q-Link end than just
      >the interface for the users. There was also their entire billing and
      >password security system. There was also a "back door" of sorts where
      >Q-Link menus and what-not could be updated via AOL.

      AOL is in fact largely based on rewritten QLink (nee PlayNet)
      code. Many of the algorithms are unchanged.

      >Another possibility is that they cannot rather than will not. Q-Link
      >licensed the software from Playnet and acquired the rights to it only
      >after winning a lawsuit against the receiver of the bankrupt Playnet.
      >They never did get all the source code and documentation the lawsuit
      >gave them the rights to. So, they may not be able to either because the
      >terms of the judgement don't allow it or they simply don't have it all.

      In fact, they may not have the right to resell the technology;
      it depends on what rights they got. (I suspect they eventually got all the
      rights, though.)

      They did, however, have all the source code and documentation
      for the PlayNet system, at least as it was when they licensed it (we made
      a number of mods later to PlayNet, some of which were activated and some
      never were). I spent a number of days down there training various
      programmers there on the design. One thing added after QLink (now AOL)
      licensed PlayNet was a quite complete auditorium/panel/etc setup with
      queuing, moderators, etc, run entirely via online messages (no client
      software change required). This was complete and tested and finished
      the week before PlayNet declared bankruptcy, so no one ever actually used
      it. There were other things too, but I remember that because I was working
      on it as PlayNet went under. Of course, they made their own mods
      (initially mostly cosmetic, but they added lots of stuff later).

      As must be obvious, I was one of the main (and last) programmers at
      PlayNet. It's _really_ amusing to look at AOL today and say "I know why
      users are limited to 10-character names.", and see many other elements of
      the original PlayNet design unchanged (even though the reason for them is
      LONG gone). For example, the 10-character name limit was largely based on
      how many screen names we could display in the room header in chat within
      4(?) 40-character lines on a C64 screen. Ditto the screen-name defaults (I
      remember us sitting around BS'ing about how we'd handle that, and conflicts
      - so now you have JoeS12345.) Online messages and how they popped up were
      another Playnet idea (remember, the next-most-sophisticated system at the
      time was Compuserve's ASCII "CB". Much has changed in AOL, of course, but
      it's kind-of heartening to see just how well a design from 1984-85 for 64K
      6502-based machines has held up over the years, at least in the broad
      strokes.

      The system (PlayNet and QLink) was actually quite sophisticated.
      It was run by programs written in a multi-tasking state-machine language.
      (Yes, your C64 was multi-tasking when doing this - N state-machine tasks
      plus the "main" (basic/etc) task, which ran the game or whatever if needed.
      Things like Online messages caused a new task to be started.) The
      communications protocol was designed (by me) to error-correct the X.25
      padmodem link, obey a limit on packet size (128?), and minimize the
      number of packets (since we were charged both by the hour and the packet
      back then). It used CRC error-checking (yes, in a C64), asymmetric
      sliding-windows, piggybacked-acks, selective retransmit

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    2. Re:Dear God, Why? by Celt · · Score: 1

      Interesting, AOL UK gives McAfee Personal Firewall for free when you get DSL with them, dialup don't get it at all & both dialup and DSL customers can get McAfee Antivirus for 2.92 a month afaik

      As for entire technical support devision based in India, I don't know how true this is in the US but in the UK its based in India, Canada, Ireland & UK

      Tech knowledge does vary alot company to company and this applies to AOL also, hehe funnily enough I phoned my ISP looking for my DNS settings for my DSL line and it took the tech 10min to find them and he seemed VERY unsure about what he was giving me.

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    3. Re:Dear God, Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL has tech support call centers in Florida, Arizona, Utah and New Mexico here in the US, as well as support center in the Phillipines. And just like every call support I have ever used, you get good reps & bad reps, esp. with free support lines.

    4. Re:Dear God, Why? by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      AOL is dialup computer network that provides internet psuedo-access through a proxy. It's not a true ISP. The majority of pluses a software firewall offers would be redundant due to the fact that your behind AOL's proxy.

    5. Re:Dear God, Why? by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

      > Is it just me or does this seem equivalent to signing away your soul to Satan? Its just you. Satan would never ask for your immortal soul and $299. Just your soul and you don't even have to pay shipping and handling.

      --
      Squirrel!
    6. Re:Dear God, Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me or does this seem equivalent to signing away your soul to Satan?

      Doesn't look to be as bad as the "ad supported" PCs from the dot-com bomb. Those would lock your screen to 800x600, but only allow you to use 640x480 of it and use the rest for ads that were constatly being streamed.

      AOL at least go smart and tied a monthly service charge to it and isn't trying to give it away for free.

    7. Re:Dear God, Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your uninformed rant.

      AOL does have technical support in India, as well as Arizona, Florida, and New Mexico. I believe HP has tech support in india. http://www.computerworld.com/managementtopics/mana gement/helpdesk/story/0,10801,90085,00.html

      AOL's Firewall is actually rebranded McAfee, which isn't bad at all, certainly better than the XP product. They also offer McAfee anti-virus. It's included with you AOL Broadband subscription. I won't say there motives aren't to make money, but I hardly think the negative spin is deserved.

      Just remember that when you buy HP products this is the type of misinformed technical support you get. Please consider buying another product, or if you buy from HP pray you tech support calls go to india, cause this bigot won't help you.

    8. Re:Dear God, Why? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      What's Playnet?

      I thought AOL was based off AppleLink or some old Apple service? I also thought that's why the AOL software and Apple's old eWorld software were pretty much the same things just with different content?

  54. AOL Optimized PC? by gotem · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if the keyboard will default to Caps Lock turned on

  55. Now people can finally pin down their tech-support by tempest69 · · Score: 1
    This keeps the techies from saying that it's a hardware issue. I bet all their tech got the procedure change form, that lets them say its a microsoft issue, or a wall power irregularity. Damn I can wait to see what happens once all these AOL-pc's get bonzai buddy et all on them

    Storm

  56. Another one... by Merovign · · Score: 1


    Great, now Office Depot are about to be introduced to their own September That Never Ended....

    I don't think we'll really see a statistically significant change online... I mean the clue ratio will go from 13.2 to 12.9%. Who cares?

  57. Random semi-on-topic AOL rant.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Informative

    My Casio PDA had a large AOL setup program built into the ROM. Even in the unlikely event that i would have needed it i would only have ever used it once! Bloody idiots wasted all that space instead of including some useful software.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  58. Wasn't this found unenforcable? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Back a few years ago, didn't they find that 12 month commitment not enforceable in California?

  59. Cut-throat? Don't be so sure by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, AOL sucks. But the target range here isn't the Linux geek with the 3MB/Sec connection. Like it was stated in the article, the target consists of A) retirees, but B) mostly minority and minimum-wage groups. In this case, they'll be happy just to have a connection - since they'll be paying for it anyway (if it didn't ship with AOL for a year, they'd still have to get a connection somehow), this really is a good deal for them.

    1. Re:Cut-throat? Don't be so sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does this happen with you, too? In Firefox, go to the URL http;//slashdot.org (note the semicolon). Maybe it was just me

      That's because firefox tries to parse the invalid url by googling for it and going to the first link. You will find by googling for "http" that MS is the top link. This is probably MS trying to claim a bunch of technical search terms.

    2. Re:Cut-throat? Don't be so sure by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I tried that http;//slashdot.org thing in your .sig---scary!!!

    3. Re:Cut-throat? Don't be so sure by sydres · · Score: 1

      yep even with just the http; it goes to microsoft.com

  60. Re:The Racial Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    christ, i forsee flames, chrome and pictures of the virgin mary everywhere. aye dios mio!

  61. AOL OS by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    So it's already got AOL ISP & AOL Office.

    Why not cut a few more bucks and run a custom Linux AOL OS.

    This computer is too slow to run any high end games. So the only thing it would really be used for is Office and the Internet.

    AOL could then supply updates and software through it's online service.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  62. Re: your Sig. by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been discussed. It's not some conspiracy theory or sneaky DNS redirect.

    If you type in a non-valid URL, Firefox automagically does a "I'm feeling lucky" search on what you typed. The first result comes back microsoft.com, for whatever reason.

    Verify this yourself by typing the same thing into google and hitting search/lucky.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  63. Sounds to me like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a nice little computer. However, if I made this purchase, I would take it home, re-format the HD, install my favorite Linux distro and find a way to cancel that shitty AOL contract - or give them some false info in the first place. Then, it would be a very nice little computer =)

    AOL??? You have got to be kidding me. Only idiots use AOL?

  64. Question by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    I'm not trolling but if Linux is so ready for the desktop (as mentioned by all the comments here) why on earth didn't AOL go with some version of Linux?

    Not only could they have made a bigger amount of profit on each one (lets be honest, they wouldn't have passed the cost reduction onto the customer) but they could probably lock it down better too and supply a whole bunch of applications such as OpenOffice to encourage users not to think about reformatting their HD.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  65. It had to be said, some time or another by Cyburbia · · Score: 1

    Why is it "AOL Optimized?" Does it have a drool-proof keyboard with special keys including [LOL], [A/S/L], [OMG WTF] and [ME TOO!!!1!]?

  66. Advertising Revenue Up by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost to disguise advertisements as geek reports on slashdot? I'm sure lots of other companies would love to take advantage of something like this "report."

  67. Re:basic... very basic. - makes you realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $299.99 + $286.80 = $586.79 -- makes you realize just how much money AOL is making on users who pay $23.90 per month and did not get the $299 computer deal...

  68. You have to admit AOL's marketing is pretty good by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Years ago when I did technical support, AOL was absolute garbage.

    Besides cleaning up their act and lessening their propriataryness, they have also added halfway decent tools for newbies.

    Now I would never recommend AOL to an experianced netizien, but They have cleaned up their act and made a product that I would recommend them to a newby.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  69. I'm scared... by Fantasio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'll notice that the configuration does not include any firewall or any anti-virus .... and the targeted customer will be the most vulnerable. Be prepared for an AOL army of spamming zombies

  70. At 299, I have to wonder... by gillbates · · Score: 1, Insightful

    why doesn't it run Linux? Granted, AOL, if you're going to use a PC as a loss leader, you might as well use Linux - at least you won't be paying the Redmond tax.

    I take it that this PC is intended for newbies, which is why Linux makes a perfect choice:

    • Newbies don't know *NOT* to click on every attachment in Outlook. Using Linux will avoid numerous support calls due to viruses and spyware.
    • Newbies don't know they need to patch Windows every month. Explaining this to them is going to consume even more of AOL's support resources, increasing the cost of the computer for AOL. With Linux, this wouldn't be an issue.
    • Newbies won't have to unlearn bad habits from Windows in order to use Linux - as this will be the *FIRST* system they've owned, it will be easier to get them started out right.
    • For most people, a PC is a glorified word processor with internet access and email. For this, Linux would be a better choice than Windows.

    Okay, there is one caveat: games and off the shelf software. A good Wine setup could handle the latter; the former, well, maybe not so much. But then, what would you expect for $259?*

    * - price of computer sans Windows XP license....

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:At 299, I have to wonder... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ugh. This is a nice and clueless comment. Why? Because AOL PCs are for people who want games (first on the list, look at the sales for Deer Hunter), email, games, a few office programs, and web games.

      If you've met the type of AOL user I'm used to, the kind that download anything they can find from AOL games and/or PopCap, including whatever ridiculous games that are included in email attachments, which include viruses, you know that Linux is not an option here.

      This is a post that gets moderated high because it praises Linux. But in the real world, the world that I live in and have to support anything from clueless users to family members, Linux is nowhere near an option for AOL users.

      I love Linux, but built for AOL-ers it is not (at this point).

  71. Re:Looks Like Open Office Is The Default Office Su by KangXii · · Score: 1

    I don't think it helps much when they slap AOL in front of everything though.

  72. Not only do they want... by The+Hobo · · Score: 1
    A bad rep for high cost internet services...
    • A ***Celeron*** 2.0
    • 256 megs of ram (PC2100! Ack!)
    • a LEXMARK printer (mucho ink cartrige price)
    • 12 months of service at a ridiculous rate for dialup
    • A mini tower (forget upgrades) and a mere 250W PSU


    And the fact that you can get a better deal for dialup from any other ISP makes you wonder just why they'd do something like this... You can very likely newegg yourself a better PC for the same cost using a lower priced ISP


    Means they also want a bad rep for PC services!
    Take what I say with a grain of salt, for I have had bad experiences with a celeron before, but I don't think I'm far off the mark here.
    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
  73. Great promo if they would tie it in somehow by for_usenet · · Score: 1

    Just a little while ago, Office Depot announced a PC recycling program. See this link. It would have been a great promo if they could have worked in some kind of discount with the new PCs, or even flexibility with the service provider, when you brought in your old PC.

    In the same breath, one can't help but wonder if any of the components in these "new" PCs are from the recycling program, esp. considering the specs of some of the components, namely the optical drives ;-)

  74. What a crappy machine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The spectacular Systemax AOL PC runs on a blazing fast Intel Celeron 2.0GHz CPU that carries with it 256MB of lightning-quick DDR main memory - upgradeable to a mind-boggling 2GB - a 40GB Ultra ATA 100 hard drive and so many extras that we could fill volumes of literature describing them. Here are just a few - 52X CD-ROM drive, SIS Integrated Graphics, Cyber Acoustics CA-2016 2-piece speaker system, Realtek AC '97 6-channel audio, 6 USB 2.0 ports, 56K Max v.92 Send/Receive Fax Hard Modem, 10/100Mbps LAN Support, 104-key Keyboard, Scroll Mouse and mouse pad. Of course, the AOL Systemax PC runs on the award-winning Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system for incomparable performance and stability.
    Wow. Those are some pretty "amazing extras."

    I think it's amusing that this system is really bad, and yet their promo makes it sound like it's the best computer there ever was.

    I built my computer 2 years ago and it's much better than this thing.
  75. I've never seen so much marketdroid... by vectrex · · Score: 1

    ...use so much exclamated speech selling an obviously lowpar computer:

    [...] runs on a blazing fast Intel Celeron 2.0GHz CPU that carries with it 256MB of lightning-quick DDR main memory - upgradeable to a mind-boggling 2GB - a 40GB Ultra ATA 100 hard drive and so many extras that we could fill volumes of literature describing them [...]. (emphasis added).

    I guess someone forgot to take their prescription pills.

  76. Wal-Mart Linspire / Lycoris anyone by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't the Wal-Mart PC's the same price without the dial-up commitment?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  77. [mods, please ignore this] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuttles, your sig, "Christian and proud of it" strikes a weird chord with me. On the one hand, I applaud your desire to announce your faith to the world, and I appreciate the sentiment. But on the other hand, I also know that "proud" and "Christian" don't really belong in the same sentence unless they're used in contrast, as in: Christians should be humble, not proud. In my opinion, choosing a different word could improve the strength of your message (for both believers and non-believers).

    1. Re:[mods, please ignore this] by Nuttles · · Score: 1

      i have addressed this issue before on /. and i do not think that it is a contradiction. It saids in the Bible, "if you are going to boast, boast in the Lord", if you want me to give you a more detailed response I will look up my previous response and get more scripture to back it up.

      Nuttles
      Christian and proud of it

    2. Re:[mods, please ignore this] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I feel compelled to point out that pride is a form of boasting in yourself, not in the Lord.

      Let me offer a suggestion... It sounds to me like you're trying to say that you're "very pleased" (i.e. jubilant or exultant), which is one of the definitions of proud; however, the word primarily means "having or displaying excessive self-esteem" (i.e. conceited). m-w.com also says:

      synonyms PROUD, ARROGANT, HAUGHTY, LORDLY, INSOLENT, OVERBEARING, SUPERCILIOUS, DISDAINFUL mean showing scorn for inferiors. PROUD may suggest an assumed superiority or loftiness <too proud to take charity> ...
      Again, I'll repeat my claim that we are to be humble (according to m-w.com, this means "not proud or haughty : not arrogant or assertive"). God's grace is a gift to us in spite of our failings. We understand that we cannot acquire this gift by any earthly means, and we must humbly confess and ask forgiveness. Thus it is not something of which to be proud, but it is something of which we can be glad! :)

      Here's a suggestion: Try using "glad" instead of proud. Glad means "experiencing pleasure, joy, or delight : made happy " or "made pleased, satisfied, or grateful -- often used with of <was glad of their help>". Thus, it has all of the positive connotations of proud, but without the negative. The only downside is that the word "glad" doesn't flow as well as "proud" (partly because we're too conditioned to seeing "American and Proud" type bumper stickers).

      AC
      Christian and glad of my salvation

    3. Re:[mods, please ignore this] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you are going to boast, boast in the Lord"

      Matthew 6: 5-6

      "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."

      Oh wait. That's the OPPOSITE of your point. Nevermind.

      (Posting anonymously since I have already moderated this thread.)

    4. Re:[mods, please ignore this] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry that we disagree over the semantics of the word proud. I still claim that its primary meaning dominates its secondary meaning, but it's clear that we will not agree on that point. You've taken it to mean jubilant, and I'm fine with that. But please understand that other people will misread it as a lack of humility. I'm simply trying to help you improve the evangilistic power of your message.

    5. Re:[mods, please ignore this] by Nuttles · · Score: 1

      Good point, I will be changing my sig, thanks for you weel thought out message whoever you are

      Nuttles
      Christian, saved by grace

  78. Re:The Racial Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does NAACP protests have to do with companies targeting low income minorities? Oh, you think all blacks are low income. Now I understand why the NAACP is protesting your state. Idiot.

  79. Theres no any any key! by essreenim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, on the bottom left the 'ANY KEY' key,
    and 'EJECT CUP HOLDER' key.

  80. AOL Sun Workstation by Proc6 · · Score: 1

    With Sun in the shape it's in, floundering about looking for a market and losing money in the process, I'm suprised it doesn't read "AOL Optimized Sun Workstation $299". Hehe.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  81. Iopener by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

    If only they had a typo on their website that forgot to mention the 1 year AOL commitment, we'd have another IOpener & Websurfer incident on our hands.

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  82. This article seems to indicate... by donnyspi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...that these PCs are only for minorities and poor people. What's up with that?

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=7 38&e=1&u=/nm/20040812/tc_nm/media_aol_dc

  83. AOL service by nuggetman · · Score: 1

    I must say, even though a majority of it is still crap and bloat, AOL's service HAS improved since Steve Case stepped down as CEO. Any time I have to use it at a friend's house I always get on in the first try, and it's usually a 52000bps conneciton. Not to mention you can now get AOL email over standard IMAP, and there's rumors that standard Dialup Networking connecting is on the way.

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  84. If AOL had BALLS... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    Why doesn't AOL even try to compete against Microsoft?

    I'm a big fan of Microsoft (no kidding) and use Windows XP for almost everything (and FreeBSD for some specialized high-end servers). BUT I wonder why AOL--the company that OWNS Netscape--doesn't even try to compete agains Microsoft when it can?

    I would have loved to see these PCs running FreeBSD (since they control the hardware, they can pick just the right video card and network card), with Mozilla/Netscape, and OpenOffice. Seems that they only got 1 out of 3 right!

    And if users wanted Windows, they can sell them a disk. But for most of their target that just wants to browse the web and do email, it would be possible.

    I suspect the main barrier is doing a FreeBSD version of their client software. It must be hard for AOL/TW to hire progammers and they can't/won't let their Indian sweatshops do a new version.

  85. Pot calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And HP is so much better... how? Sure, you might be one of the few decent tech support guys there; but this is HP we're talking about. Their tech support is pretty lousy if you ask me (long holds, typical "reboot" solution, etc.)

    1. Re:Pot calling the kettle black by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Oh, I never said HP was that much better, but it is likely going to be better than AOL doing PC tech support.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  86. Re:coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the concept of never going into debt for a non-incoming generating purchase has a lot going for i

    Yeah, that's how I justify my Dual Opteron, 4GB RAM, 10TB SCSI Array, triple 21inch LCD gig too: email is essential.

  87. Via Eden equivalent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this just screaming for a $225 via eden or equivalent based small box system?

    I am still waiting on the mass marketed, $200, micro footprint system + $50 for a monitor.

  88. It's been done by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 3, Informative
    # Keyboard: with LOL, OMG, >_< and WTF keys

    Most important feature, that.

    It's been done. Not only that it's been patented. :o)

    US Patent 6,629,793 The Emoticon Keyboard

    1. Re:It's been done by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "It's been done. Not only that it's been patented."

      you say that as if there is usually a disjunction between the two events...

    2. Re:It's been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmh.. I checked the patent. Sorry. No "LOL", "OMG" ">_>" or "WTF".

      The did have WTH (What The Heck??!) and ROTFL, but that just doesn't do it for me.

  89. Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I haven't seen anyone ask the obvious question here: Why isn't anyone doing this with a Linux machine/setup? I'm sure Redhat or someone could do a similar thing. Noone here is courageous enough to set up this kind of deal?

  90. More old news by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    This really isn't anything new. Check out this article from a year or two ago about a $200 AOL optimized computer. Better yet, here's an article by The Register referring to a similar Compuserve move and AOL's planned response, dated 1999!

    Plus, I'm sure everyone saw these computers advertised at some point. I know the $200 emachines ads caught my eye a couple years ago. It seems the original submission is about 5 years behind in the news.

  91. MODS ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait = anything you don't agree with that has 1 or more replies.

  92. This is no great deal by dan_sdot · · Score: 1

    If you want a crappy computer, why would you force yourself to use aol for a year? They are not giving any sort of extra discount on this computer.
    Look at this. This computer here is $15 dollars cheaper, and has the following specs:
    - Celeron 2.0 G
    - 128 MB mem (which is less, but an extra 128 is what, 30 bucks?)
    - 40 G harddrive (western digital)
    - Then some crappy on board hardware.
    Of course, this does not have a monitor, but those are also very cheap at this size (and I actually have a hard time not collecting free ones at this size somehow.)

    1. Re:This is no great deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This PC is way overpowered as far as I'm concerned. Even for designing in 3D, I use PIIs all the time. With a 64meg video card and plenty of RAM even an old K6 350 works fine.
      All you get with a Ghz+ machine is a nice fat electric bill.
      The fact is, all x86 architectures run at 66Mhz with clock multipliers. So, as long as you've got enough RAM and a thirty dollar video card you've got everything --and in a sense you get more because it uses less power-- in a six year old board/CPU combo.
      This only fails to be true when you get into video compression. But even there 2Ghz is far more than necessary for smooth playback of hardcore compressed video.
      How about 1Ghz processor, 512Megs of RAM, onboard LAN and radeon video with no hard drive for a little less than a hundred bucks. That sounds more interesting to me. Of course AOL is a fucking joke to begin with. I'm not even sure why I'm even in this thread.

  93. Wouldn't it be... by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

    Point, click, Administrator?

    How can they take advantage of LSASS on Mac OSX?
    Unless I am mistaken LSASS is unique to Win2k, XP, and 2003.

  94. As Master Bill Predicted by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Computers will be free. You will pay for the software.

  95. For Comparison by krgallagher · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is the cut rate system from Walmart.

    Hardware details: * AMD Athlon 2000 Processor * 128 MB DDR RAM * Expandable up to 1 GB RAM * 40 GB hard drive * Includes keyboard, mouse, stereo speakers and Ethernet interface (does not include monitor) * Supports onboard AMD Duron processor * Supports 200 MHz front-side bus * Supports integrated 256 MB SDRAM onboard * Shared memory architecture allows a maximum of 64 MB main memory to act as frame buffer * Linare PC comes with the following types of support: phone, e-mail and web * Includes a 1-year warranty return to manufacturer * Model AD2000 * Supports high resolutions up to 1920 x 1440 Software details: * Linare Linux * Linux-based operating system * KDE: powerful graphical desktop environment * OpenOffice Office Suite * Mozilla browser * Mozilla e-mail

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  96. Actually not a bad deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    $74: A-DATA 184 Pin 512MB DDR PC-3200 - OEM:

    $29.99: Lite-On Black 52X32X52 CD-RW Drive, Model LTR-52327S, OEM

    $64.50: SAPPHIRE ATI RADEON 9200 Video Card, 128MB DDR, 128-bit, DVI/TV-Out, 8X AGP -BULK -OEM

    $56.00: Shuttle "AN35N-Ultra" nForce2 Ultra 400 Chipset Motherboard for AMD Socket A CPU -RETAIL

    $59.00: AMD Athlon XP 2000+, 266 FSB, 256K Cache Processor - Retail:

    $44.00 POWMAX BIO Black/Silver Mid tower Case, Model "CP510-2" -RETAIL

    $53.00 SAMSUNG 40GB 7200RPM Light and Slim IDE Hard Drive, Model SP0411N, OEM Drive only

    $134.00: ViewSonic E70FB 17" PerfectFlat CRT Monitor -RETAIL

    $42.95: Lexmark Z615 Color Inkjet Printer, 14 PPM, 4800 x 1200 DPI, Color/B& W

    $11.50: CNet Internal 56K V.92 PCI Fax/Data/TAM Modem, Model CN5614RV - Retail


    Total: $568.94

    Now, get dialup internet service from your local ip for $10 a month for 12 months:
    $120

    Total comes out to 688.94.

    $102.15 more than the aol package, but you get a much more reliable package than that 2.0 ghz stick of celery.

    Also if you're not going to build this pc yourself (likely if you are considering buying an AOL computer), you can hire your neighborhood geek or try one of the professional outfits. I have no idea how much it costs, because I always assemble mine and my family's computers. I'd say it can't be more than another $100...

    So if you are a technological newbie, I'd say go with the AOL pc if you're looking for one. Otherwise, buy your parts and start building ;)

    1. Re:Actually not a bad deal. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      You forgot

      The look on the face of your neighbor when you tell him "There it is now you put it together" - Priceless

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  97. Re:coincidence? by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    quote
    People joke about "Wogs and Cash", but the concept of never going into debt for a non-incoming generating purchase has a lot going for it.
    end quote

    Can't say I have heard this one before, and I'm guessing it's english from the use of wog... I suppose the reasoning being wogs can't get / won't have bank accounts?

    However the sentiment is a valid one, I don't have much compared to many in the western world, but what I do have I own 100%, and I do not have any credit anywhere, by choice, so many people who "appear" to have far more than me (new car etc) actually have far less, as they own little outright and owe fortunes that would have me considering having some kids so I could sell them into slavery and pay off the debts.

    I have to admit to being saddened when the net and computing has been reduced to a free gift to sweeten some long term "service" contract.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  98. US politics by hummassa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What I do want to understand is: why there isn't a single non-rich OR non-white OR non-christian running for prez in the US of A? why both Dem and Rep always indicate them? Why don't you for the love of $DEITY start voting ONLY in non-Democrats-non-Republicans for every single instance?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:US politics by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Because it seems to be widespread knowledge that third party candidates can never be elected. It's WRONG widespread knowledge- but the two party system is strong enough to give that impression.

      I'd say that the best way for a third party to have a chance in the United States would be a massive effort just before the primary season to sign up new voters- and get old ones to switch. And by massive, I mean having at least 100 million people switch parties just before the primary season. THAT would give a third party candidate enough legs to have a chance.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  99. AOL optimized? by koan · · Score: 1

    What it has a credit card reader built into it?

    Just a joke I simply refuse to read anything with "AOL" in it.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  100. Nope by 2names · · Score: 1

    0 = Y 1

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:Nope by 2names · · Score: 1
      Damn HTML crap.


      0 = Y 1

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  101. Re:coincidence? by 1000101 · · Score: 1

    A non-income generating purchase like a car? I gotta have one of those.

  102. God Damn It by 2names · · Score: 1

    I selected Plain Old Text and it still interpreted the less than sign as a tag member.

    Piece of shit.

    0 <= Y < 1

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:God Damn It by slimak · · Score: 1

      maybe you want to give preview a shot :)

    2. Re:God Damn It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha.. what a beautiful comment! I'm laffin' and droolin' at the same time. My virtual hat is off to you. Preview iz da bomb!

  103. Cheesy computer description by valkraider · · Score: 1
    This one is the worst. Sounds like one of those infomercials... In case of slashdotting, here it is:


    Introducing the Systemax AOL Special!

    AOL and Systemax combine forces to bring you one of the greatest deals ever on a loaded powerhouse desktop PC and monitor, featuring bumper-to-bumper world-class components, along with a top-quality Lexmark Ink Jet Printer! The spectacular Systemax AOL PC runs on a blazing fast Intel Celeron 2.0GHz CPU that carries with it 256MB of lightning-quick DDR main memory - upgradeable to a mind-boggling 2GB - a 40GB Ultra ATA 100 hard drive and so many extras that we could fill volumes of literature describing them. Here are just a few - 52X CD-ROM drive, SIS Integrated Graphics, Cyber Acoustics CA-2016 2-piece speaker system, Realtek AC '97 6-channel audio, 6 USB 2.0 ports, 56K Max v.92 Send/Receive Fax Hard Modem, 10/100Mbps LAN Support, 104-key Keyboard, Scroll Mouse and mouse pad. Of course, the AOL Systemax PC runs on the award-winning Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system for incomparable performance and stability. And this fantastic computer is housed in a sleek, stylish fully equipped black Micro ATX tower case with 250-Watt power supply.

    17" Non-Interlaced Black SVGA Monitor
    We've added the perfect monitor to accompany the incredible Systemax AOL PC - this 17-inch non-interlaced black SVGA. Boasting 1280 x 1024 maximum resolution, .27 dot pitch and unlimited display colors, this outstanding monitor delivers brilliant colors, sharp contrasts and exceptional text recognition. Its handsomely appointed, durable construction is the ideal complement to your brand new computer!

    Lexmark Black Ink Jet Printer
    This amazing deal just gets better and better. The computer and monitor alone are worth hundreds more than what we're asking for the entire package. Add in this legendary Lexmark black ink Jet Printer and you have a value that you just cannot afford to pass up. This fast, high-performance printer offers 35mm photo quality resolution, 4800 x 1200 DPI printing, and speeds of up to 12 pages per minute (PPM) black and 7 PPM color! Durable, reliable and economical - the Lexmark Ink Jet puts the exclamation point on this super Systemax AOL PC special!

    The Best Technical Support in the Industry!
    Best of all, this Systemax AOL PC comes with best-in-the-business technical support and warranty. Our rock-solid one-year limited warranty includes 24/7 toll-free technical support that averages less than a minute of hold time - one of the best in the industry. Our technicians resolve over 80% of our customer's problems within 10 minutes of the first call. The exclusive easy-to-use Tech-In-A-Box software, included in every PC, provides a fail-safe recovery and restore solution in the event of system failure. This drastically reduces the PC user's potential down time, and greatly minimizes the possibility of catastrophic system failure. With a Systemax PC, you'll get years and years of experience, amazing service, excellent craftsmanship and a PC that is built to the highest industry standards in our ISO 9001 certified facility.

  104. This is not a crappy computer by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Half the posts are saying "Who cares? It's an entry-level $299 computer." Someone please tell me why a normal computer user (the type who uses AOL) needs anything faster than a 2GHz Celeron with 256MB of RAM?

    Word Processing? check.
    Web surfing? check.
    Email? check.
    Office applications? check.
    Solitaire? check.
    All of the above simultaneously? check.
    Doom 3? Oops!

    Other than video games, a typical "entry-level" PC like this does fine. This is the same thing as Microsoft having trouble getting people off of Windows '9x.

    The Mah & Pah with a 500Mhz PII doesn't need anything faster. Their broadband is still slower than the speed that their PC can render a web page. It still plays chess better than they do. And they don't notice the few seconds of paging when the switch apps.

    1. Re:This is not a crappy computer by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Someone please tell me why a normal computer user (the type who uses AOL) needs anything faster than a 2GHz Celeron with 256MB of RAM?

      You mean besides the fact that WinXP runs like mollasses in January on only 256MB of RAM?

      That's one I have with the box, the rest of it looks alright for a basic PC, but only putting 256MB in there is really iffy. They should've sourced a cheaper CPU (even a 1Ghz CPU can work great if it has enough memory). It's gonna swap like crazy if they try to do AOL + e-mail + office all at the same time.

      The second complaint is lack of a DVD-ROM. They could've easily dropped one in there if they had gone with a cheaper CPU (same with more memory).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:This is not a crappy computer by VirtuaKnight · · Score: 1

      It's not a good one either (mainly because of being relegated to AOL for 12 months) CompUSA or one of those office supply stores is selling a computer with a 2.6Ghz CPU (Pentium, I think), etc. etc. for $500. Better parts to begin with means less upgrades and (possibly) less hardware failures due to cheapass parts. The only problem is that it's $500 after the rebate...

  105. Re:The Racial Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always said that your case ain't nothin' unless it's got hydraulics.

  106. RNot exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most important expression in the history of mankind, "WTF," is conspicuously absent...
    can anyone say "business opportunity?"

    I'll make millions, I tells ya, millions!

  107. MOD Parent UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very interesting info. I am sure many would be interested in reading more.

  108. Does it come preloaded by ralf1 · · Score: 1

    with Viruses, Trojans, Spyware, and Porn? A true AOL optimized PC needs all of those, based on the ones I've helped friends and neighbors with.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  109. Re:coincidence? by Mateito · · Score: 1

    If you use your car to generate incoming (ie, you need one for work or you can't get to work without one), its an income generating purchase.

    If you could live without a car, for example, by using public transport (which may very well be out of the question in large areas of the US), then its not a "gotta", its a "wanna".

    Also, the car you "wanna" have is probably a lot nicer than the car you "gotta" have.

    Consider the following:

    Fork out 1000 bucks from your pocket and buy a set of wheels. Obviously nothing fancy, but it serves the "gotta". In the mean time, stick what you would be paying in repayments in the bank. After 12-18 months, upgrade your bomb to something a bit nicer.

    Set up an excel spreadsheet, think about the car you want, and work out how much you'd have to spend to get there. Save what you would otherwize be paying on the loan, and see how long it would take you to get there. Depending or your tastes, you could probably do it in 3 to 5 intermediate cars. (Think 3 year old used cars for the intermediates... their depreciation rates are lower, and you'll only be holding them for a year or so).

    Suprising, isn't it?

    In my calcs, after 5 years, I am actually better off. I OWN the car, no repayments. I can then lower the money I'm putting in the bank, and roll the car over every three years for a new model.

    Note, this doesn't work if you drive thousands of miles a week for work.. but if you are doing that, its a "gotta", you are probably receiving a car allowance from your employer, and you can write off most car expenses against your tax anyway.

  110. Former Systemax Employee Weighs In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I shudder to think at how my former coworkers in Tech Support are going to handle this, or if it'll all be outsourced somewhere else.

    Systemax was capable of building some nice machines--- but I got tired of dealing with people who don't deserve a computer calling tech support and complaining that "It's not working... think the beer I spilled in the monitor was a bad thing?"

    As whitebox OEM manufacturers, they weren't too bad compared to some others in the industry.... but their HR department-- pure evil incarnate.

  111. Re:coincidence? by Mateito · · Score: 1

    I got an ABIT N7-S (?), Athlon 2600+, 1GB RAM, dual 8GB HD, 128MB ATI card (Dunno which one, but its got a TV out which was all I was really interested in), funky black case and 17" Viewsonic flat screen monitor.

    I paid cash, even though in my (our?) line of work, its an income generating purchase.

  112. I like this idea. by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly. I have broadband at home, but my primary computer is a laptop right now. I've been looking into getting a new machine to customize for gaming, and this might just be the best plan for me. Why, you may ask?

    AOL.

    I used it for my ISP for a month while I was unemployed (about the only time I was ever thankful for a free disc in the mail) and found it to be usable, if not the most pleasant experience.

    I travel quite a bit between a couple relatives' houses which don't have persistent net connections. If the contract does not require me to use AOL as the ISP on the cheap machine, or if it will accept "AOL for Broadband" (which I will never use), I'll gladly sign up once I get some extra cash, then begin loading good components in there. The dial-up will be a good backup for the laptop.

    Of course, that's just me, and I'm crazy. Sure, there are better alternatives, but in my situation, this looks pretty tempting.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  113. But iDot machines at $200 no committment by gelfling · · Score: 1

    There are machines out there like iDot who sell lower end PCs - Athlon, 128Mb, no hard drive no monitor for about $160-$199. You could easily configure an AMD 2100, 512MB RAM, 40GB drive, sound, video, kb, mouse, Linspire, with shipping for about $385.

    You could but a sub300 machine for about $225 + 50 bucks more for a drive and be out the door with a non bleeding edge machine for under 300 bucks.

    And they don't require a monthly pimp fee to AOL.

  114. Basic and slow by AShuvalov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Practically no modern game will play on this "machine". You get a web browser, mp3 player and a text editor with printer, that's pretty much it. Garbage from my point of view.

    If you need something as close to ground as this, consider Ebay. Recently I purchased a very decent a nice-looking HP's IPAQ PC for $35:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ca te gory=51109&item=5115338678&rd=1

    like this one.

    The config like the one this AOL ad has will cost you around $100-$150 on Ebay.

    --
    Andrew
    1. Re:Basic and slow by abirdman · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, except that the people this product is being marketed to have got to buy the computer and AOL access before they can get onto eBay! Sad, but true. And after a year online, I'm pretty sure they'll think the $20/month they're paying AOL is too high too. But that's how some people learn.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
  115. Re:The Racial Target by sahuaro · · Score: 1
    I'm in the middle of reading World War 3.0: Microsoft Vs. the U.S. Government, and the Battle to Rule the Digital Age by Ken Auletta and this looks exactly like what MS didn't want vendors to have the ability to do - to totally customize the Windows Desktop, real estate that Ms wanted full control over.

    Looks like the anti-trust settlement made this computer possible.

    sahuaro

    --
    Phoenix Linux Users Group
    Penguins in the desert
  116. Anyone else... by dhoonlee · · Score: 1

    find the name "AOL Optimized" kind of deceptive? Seriously, what computer needs to be optimized for AOL? And looking at the specs, how is this computer optimized to do ANYTHING? (well, perhaps the price is optimized)

  117. Actual Cost.... by jdragan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, the PC is $299, the service is $23.90. Looks like AOL is picking up the rest of the actual cost of the machine by charging a high price for dial-up. Pretty soon, they are going to want to recoup the cost by raising the dial-up rates by $1.00 - $1.50. That is a lot of money considering how many AOL idiots there are out there...

  118. Re:The Racial Target by LeBlanc_Joey · · Score: 1

    Your sig just happened to me. I think anytime you put ; instead of : you go to microsoft.

    --

    Everything in moderation, even moderation.

    No, especially moderation.

  119. I Feel sorry for the tech support... by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 1

    Whoever handles the support issues for these trashy units is just gonna love it!

  120. AOL? Cheap offers? by JackHoffv1 · · Score: 0

    This is no real surprise a fledgling isp that is going down the perverbial toilet and what do they think of. No not cheaper and more efficient servers, but a cheap not even worthy of a 3-world country computer. This isn't gonna attract the users they want. It'll attract the idiot people who see the name AOL besides it.

  121. Dell Poweredge 400sc $249 after rebate by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Celeron 2.4, 128mb ram, 40gb HD, no OS. Get it from their small business site. It has an i875 motherboard, onboard gigabit ethernet, 24x CD. For an addional 100$ you can upgrade to a P4 2.8 HT cpu.

  122. I'll tell you why. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the love of Christ, that's all we need is more ignorant AOL users on slow dialup connections.

    I'll agree that ignoranmce can caus eproblems, but why do *you* care if they are on slow connections? Unless you just want to email huge attachments to everyone you know, or hijack their comupters. The majority of people I know (and I'm a big dog geek in a town full of geeks, but I know lots of folks all over) are still on dialup.

    Frankly, I'm quite surprised that AOL hasn't gone the way of many other services (Prodigy, MSN, etc.) that abandoned their proprietary software for simple internet access.

    Since they're hugely successful, that would be stupid. They would need a compelling case to change over. And a lot of people are *happy* with AOL. AOL works just fine for the teeming masses. Do I wish it were better than it is? Of course. But their users are happy, and keep sending them money. So why should they change?

  123. Er... not that great of price. by Bandit0013 · · Score: 1

    DellSB - Dimension 2400 with P4 2.8GHz,128MB RAM, 80GB HD, and 48x CD-RW for Only $320 after Rebate with free Shipping.

    It also comes with a 10/100 NIC, 56K modem, stereo speakers, Windows XP Home, and a 2 year in-home warranty (worth $113)

    Note that you can upgrade to Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 48x CD-RW Drive [add $19]

    Then just go to newegg or wherever and buy a cheap 512mb stick of ram and you're all set. Under $450 and way way way more power.

  124. Can't Wait Until... by skammie · · Score: 0

    People start to sell them in about a year, year and half. They might make nice, cheap Linux boxes. If a dim-wit you know buys one, and one would expect AOL to push a newer model every 1 to 3 years, you might be able to pick one up a used one really cheap (maybe $100 - $150 w/out monitor).

    --
    "Fortunately, I'm adhering to a very strict drug regimen to keep my mind limber..."
  125. Old CRTs by beakburke · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem with ebaying monitors is that they are notoriously expensive to ship, and thus aren't worth shipping unless they are worth a decent amount of money, (being they are used and only 15in, they aren't going to be worth much). You might be able to get $10-20/each at a local place, especially if you have a lot of them to sell in bulk since you don't have to worry bout shipping.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  126. 50 gb harddrive? by xzachx · · Score: 1

    wtf is a 50gb harddrive?!

  127. local numbers by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Does she have local dialup numbers in nearly all parts of the US?

    Those of us who travel would like to make local calls from hotel rooms, instead of paying long-distance charges to connect to the internet. At least until broadband internet in hotel rooms becomes common/cheaper ($10/day is not acceptable).

    That's the main advantage of AOL, Earthlink, and other national ISPs.

    1. Re:local numbers by ncc74656 · · Score: 0
      Does she have local dialup numbers in nearly all parts of the US?

      It seems a fair number of dialup ISPs anymore are little more than resellers of access that's provided nationwide by a handful of companies. The last time I fired up a dialup connection, MaGlobe (a prepaid dialup ISP I used as a backup) had numbers damn near everywhere.

      (On more recent trips I've taken, I've used free net access through my cellphone. The speed is comparable to dialup, and you don't get stuck paying hotel-phone charges (charges of $1-$2 per call, even for local calls, are not uncommon). It's a bit of an unadvertised feature of T-Mobile's service, but it kicks ass.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:local numbers by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "Does she have local dialup numbers in nearly all parts of the US?"

      No, but this AOL PC isn't what you'd want to take on a trip with you. You have a specific scenario that is not what this computer is intended for. Now if it were an AOL laptop you'd have a valid point.

  128. Re:The Racial Target by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    " They can also be preconfigured for Spanish language speakers." Say it. You know you want to. You know it's coming. The best case mods. Ever."

    So it's going to be rusted out and propped up on Micro Machine wheels with chrome hubcaps?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  129. Hmmm.... by codergeek42 · · Score: 0

    ...so will they be putting Win XP Starter Edition on it?

  130. Sun makes Open Office? by CovertPenguins · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean Star Office?

  131. The OpenOffice support seems like a big deal to me by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'm surprized so few people have noted the inclusion of OpenOffice. That seems like the largest-scale rollout of OpenOffice to date, and it has to have a chance to giving OpenOffice some fairly decent market share before too long. After all, Office's huge market share mostly came to be just by being included on every computer sold anywhere!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  132. The Bigger Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was recruited somewhat recently to work on this project on the US-side maintenance of the platform.

    Most of the work on this was done in Israel. I was a little bit surprised it wasn't India, but WTFDIK.

    I was told that the longer term plan is to do away with Microsoft on these machines and have an all-custom AOL blend of OS and applications.

  133. skip the printer, keyboard and mouse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a better processor: 2.0 GHZ P4 or AMD (you save a bunch on AMD and can even get a better spec AMD for the same price as a 2.0 GHZ P4)
    The only concern is the increased price on the motherboard, but that shouldn't be a big problem!
    CD writer/DVD ROM: Everyone should have this by now. Even my sorry ass 400 Mhz celeron Emachine comes with a DVD rom.

  134. They really ARE targetting Latino users. by jasonla · · Score: 2

    The LA Times carried a story with more emphasis on the ethnic/cultural angle, saying AOL is specifically targetting Latino users/families who do not already have a computer in the home in order to build their subscriber base.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-aol12aug12,1 ,3576783.story?coll=la-home-business

  135. Not just latin, but they are expanding into by nadadogg · · Score: 1

    other low-income realms. This includes a new service they are considering to reach the "urban" market, complete with "spinnaz" instead of an hourglass, and a sideways glock instead of a mouse pointer. All kidding aside, they are also aiming toward older computer purchasers in addition to the urban market. The desktops will have big friendly AOL icons on the desktop to make things easier.

    --
    i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
  136. This is a slow pc, even for entry level by postgrep · · Score: 1

    First of all, it has a celeron. This cpu constantly lags. I know, I have one in my laptop. 2nd, who the hell has a 5400rpm hard drive? Im suprised this can even do word processing! At least it has a monitor with it. But hell, I could build a pc twice as fast as this for probably half the money.

  137. There's a Simple Solution to This . . . by npsimons · · Score: 1
    Just Say NO!


    I already tell people who ask for computer help that I don't do Windows, or Mac; call Microsoft or Apple for help, that's what you're paying them for. Now if it's Linux, I'll be more than happy to help in exchange for a home cooked meal or beer.

  138. Optimized? Celeron? by ryu1232 · · Score: 1

    How can it be AOL optimized if it is only a celeron? it is going to choke under the first p2p app you throw at it, and the rampant amount of spyware that gets dl'd by most AOL users. Last but not least how do you expect it to be able to handle the next release of AOL? (which is just as bloated if not more so than windows itself.)

  139. Now if only... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    ...it came with Mozilla/Netscape pre-installed...

  140. Why is $299 good anyway? by Landak · · Score: 1

    I might just have read up till the end of page one on this- but I think that $299 for a monitor and PC of that spec is quite a lot to say the least. Buying from shops, both online, and locally, I could build a PC of moderately good spec (512 megs ram/Athlon 2.7/40 gig HDD) without a monitor for under £100. Monitors- I can get a 19" one for £50.... While I know the exchange rate is quirky at the moment, the actual relative *value* of the currencies in each country appear to be the same- you don't pay $4 for a cup of coffee over there! Oh, and I was with AOHELL for a while. Then I got banned for excessive useage. It was like being banned from prison. With the system requirements thing, that machine would have trouble running AOL 9- almost- it needs a 1 ghz p3 and 256 megs of ram......*cough* good coding *cough*....

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
  141. Let's see... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Doing at least basic image processing on photos taken with their digital camera? You'd be surprised how many moms and pops at least try their hand at photoshop nowadays.

    Some form of media encoding? You don't have to be a genius to run a file through DivX, you know. Or to rip your collection of music CDs to MP3s, so you can put them on an iPod.

    Antivirus scan kicking in? You haven't really learned what "slow" is, until you've witnessed Norton's or McAffee's scan kicking in. In fact, much of the popularity of, say, Intel's HyperThreading isn't because people have heavily-multithreaded apps, but because you can still reasonably use that computer while virus scans and such kick in.

    (Not that their real time scanning is any better. Watch the same directory full of small files take under a minute to copy to a file server, without Norton Antivirus. Watch it take more than half a fscking hour with Norton Antivirus on.)

    And so on and so forth.

    And even games aren't that unheard of among the less computer-savvy people. Just because someone isn't a die-hard smack-talking rocket-jumping Doom 3 player, doesn't mean that everything they'll ever play is Solitaire.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  142. *think* by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    you want to buy components in bulk to sell to make a cheap PC? you can't easily buy sub 2GHz processors any more, and if you can, they're no cheaper than the more common faster ones - supply and demand. windows xp on 128mb's unpleasant - 256MB nice and usable. likewise, a 20gb hard disk costs about the same as a 40gb one - i think this is actually quite a sensible basic spec.

  143. no-one uses modem banks any more by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    do they? in the UK we've all binned them and get british telecom to pipe the calls directly into a box on site.

  144. no by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    remember webtv? and eden's aren't cheap - check component prices.

  145. great, now do it again by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    ...go get all the bits, put them in a big cardboard box, and give it to your gran for 23 dollars a month. operate a 24 hour helpline, and see how long it takes her to build the machine and get online.

  146. 35 dollars? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    65 UKP here for OEM copies, and that's from the cheapest suppliers. doesn't get any cheaper unless you're buying 100+ either. wanna post a link to your supplier?

  147. because it's integrated on the mobo presumably by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    and it'd cost more to make an AOL-OEM one that took it out. it won't be costing the end user anything, so why not leave it there?

  148. Celeron 2ghz, 5400 RPM Hard Drive? by Boone_Popeye · · Score: 1

    Has anyone here used a Celeron 2ghz with a 5400 rpm hard drive on Windows XP? With only 256mb RAM, that machine is going totally page file as soon as the massive Windows XP finishes booting (which could be a while). I can't understand everyone is saying it's an OK PC for really cheap. I've personally worked on HP's and Dells (the $499 types) and once the boot was over, I was thrown right back into the 486 days. I wouldn't wish one of these pieces of poo on anyone, and certainly wouldn't want someone to pay for it.

  149. Somebody by 2names · · Score: 1
    should mod you up Funny

    good one, really.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  150. Shoddy Components by mgcarley · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder what kind of shoddy components are in a PC that, for under $600 includes a monitor and valid Windows XP licence...

    Probably the only thing in there that wouldn't be dodgy is the CPU - being Intel and all.

    Yeah yeah, troll troll... but as the former CTO (up till Feb 04) of a successful small computer manfacturer who watched competitors drop like flies, I've found in the ~1000 PC's a year we sent out, 1 or less came back every year with problems that could be traced to a dodgy Intel CPU), and FYI, I did a lot of tech work myself, and I was heavily involved with purchasing of parts and new technologies. As a general rule, Intel couldn't be beaten on quality of product.

    --
    Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley