Slashdot Mirror


Overclockers Top 6GHz With A 3.6GHz-Rated P4

sH4RD writes "The 6GHz barrier has been broken by two guys, a little LN2 (liquid nitrogen for those not as chemistry inclined), and an Intel Pentium 4 (Prescott) 3.60GHz. Check out some icing and some proof of speed. Better yet take a look at how fast it calculates pi. Also be sure to check out the original announcement."

421 comments

  1. Cold! by erick99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Imagine having to keep a vat of liquid nitrogen at your desk in order to use your computer! Notice the Fluke thermometer showing -105C (-157F). Now that is damned cold....

    -erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Cold! by _Pablo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Intel hadn't decided to kill P4 in favour of PM then we may have had to do it sooner rather than later!

      It would be amazing to have to use LN2...but then again since I first stuck my finger on top of my 68000 and realising it was a lot hotter than my 6502 i'm constantly amazed how hot these things are getting.

      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    2. Re:Cold! by buford_tannen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Imagine having to keep a vat of liquid nitrogen at your desk in order to use your computer! Notice the Fluke thermometer showing -105C (-157F). Now that is damned cold....

      I've just put in for a job working with superconducting magnets, using LHe.

      That's around 4K (-269C or -453F). Now that is damned damned damned damned cold....

      If only liquid helium were as inexpensive as LN2.... We'd see some a quantumn leap in overclocking I'd bet... (pun intended!)

      --
      Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen
    3. Re:Cold! by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're Finnish.

      They don't need liquid nitrogen. Couldn't they have just put their PC outside?

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:Cold! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They didn't kill the P4 in favor of the Pentium M. Their upcoming dual-core desktop cpus are supposedly going to be Netburst-based. I think we would all LIKE Intel to jump on the Dothan bandwagon, but whether or not they'll actually do it is completely unknown at this point. They have announced some dual-core Pentium Ms for mobile purposes, and that's it.

    5. Re:Cold! by tonywong · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Intel's theoretical limit is on for using LN2 on this processor...

    6. Re:Cold! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've beend designing and testing low-temperature superconducting chips for the last, what, like 15 years... No, there is not too much difference in the degree of coldness, if anything, LN2 can actually freeze you if you manage to stick your finger into it and keep it there long enough, LH woudl evaporate long before that! ;-)

      As to the cost -- yes, it is much cheaper to use LN2 for smallish systems (as demonstrated by the FA), but it does make maybe a factor of 10 inm electricity bills to cool a chip down to 4K rather than 77K. On top of that, right now you can get a $30K cryocooler off the shelf, if any market woudl emerge those would get down to probably a couple of thousands. Not something to put in your PC, but definitely something which can be put into a nice workstation.

      And, BTW, you can get a liter of liquid helium now for about ten bucks, if you care (it is heavily subsidized by the govt.)

      Paul B.

    7. Re:Cold! by daniil · · Score: 1

      I guess they didn't have the patience to wait for another month until it gets cold enough outside :7

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    8. Re:Cold! by niteice · · Score: 2, Funny
      They're Finnish.

      And they're using Windows. Do you see a problem here?...
      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    9. Re:Cold! by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Yeah, that was one of the most amazing things I learned from my chemistry teacher in college. He was doing the standard Liquid Nitrogen funstuffs, like dipping the flower, or the raquet ball, and a couple of other things. Then he was talking about the Liquid Nitrogen, and he pointed out that it's about as expensive as milk, per volume.

      So, what I want to know is why don't they sell it at 7-11??!? Imagine the fun, not to mention uses. Other than computers, you can use it to freeze fruits so quickly that their water crystals don't have time to form and poke through the cell walls and make the fruit mushy... I'm sure there are a hundred other uses.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    10. Re:Cold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because the polar bears would eat the computers.

    11. Re:Cold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure if theoretical limits are generally thought of when deciding to build a processor, but the yield rate of chips that run at an acceptable (marketable/profitable) speed per wafer. On a side note Intel has a working 10ghz ALU and has developed a terahertz transistor... but I don't think anything like a CPU.

      If you're interested in the behavior of electronics at very low temperatures, then one field that may interest you is 'condensed matter', which involves the study of electrons in two dimensional surfaces (Trapped in the gradient between two materials) at very low temperatures. But as stated, a plain CPU probably isn't built to withstand such low temperatures, and silicon becomes an insulator if it becomes too cold.

    12. Re:Cold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, are you saying that if I go to the Brazil there will be cold outside because I am Finnish???

    13. Re:Cold! by Cramer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Use dry ice. It's far safer and more readily available. You can pick up dry ice in any cooler. N2 comes in tanks (like scuba and welding gear.)

      I've heard of some grocery stores selling dry ice. The only place I've known of to get N2 was a welding supply house. (besides mail-order.)

    14. Re:Cold! by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Humour is lost on you, I guess.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    15. Re:Cold! by buford_tannen · · Score: 1

      Indeed, at work we have to use a cycle of LN2 first to precool the superconducting coil reservoir before we can actually begin pumping the LH in. (Otherwise it would simply boil off).

      Liquid helium may be fairly inexpensive in small quantities, but at work we use around $4,000 worth per unit (plus all of the transportation and other costs -- our helium comes in on tanker trucks which are parked and drawn from until empty). These cores use lots of helium, and if something goes wrong they will vent the whole lot to the atmosphere in a matter of minutes. Of course, when that happens we may have up to 7600A of current to dissipate (which is a rather special consideration since that kind of current would melt the coil at normal resistance).

      From what I understand, we have been using "small" amounts of our LH and LN2 for some of the classic cryogenic demonstrations around local schools. But, oddly enough, while we have a variety of SGI and PC-Linux based imaging workstations, no one around here seems to be into cryo-overclocking...

      --
      Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen
  2. Erm... by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sure hope they were using Gentoo, because if not they couldn't take advantage of those incredible speeds with some hot -O3 -funroll-loops action :P

    In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness. For sheer geek pride, sure, why not? But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance; for probably half of what these poor folks spent getting a P4 to run stably at 6 ghz (and it doesn't even sound super-stable from what I've read) they could've probably bought a couple more CPUs and had a proper SMP system instead. Regardless, I admire their tenacity and mourn for the warranty on their poor CPU :P

    1. Re:Erm... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny
      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness.
      To pick up chicks, obviously.
      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Erm... by bizpile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance;

      Isn't that what being a geek is all about? It's a "becuase it's there"-type of thing.

    3. Re:Erm... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Look at the pi calculation screenshot, they are using windows....and using a 6Ghz cpu w/ 512 ram...

    4. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness. For sheer geek pride, sure, why not?
      Oh for crying out loud. Nearly every article on Slashdot falls into that category. As does Slashdot itself. It's Saturday night, lighten up.
    5. Re:Erm... by anthonyclark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      speaking of gentoo; What I'd like to see would be a benchmark 'emerge system' or bootstrap.sh. One run should be on a single proc system with MAKEOPTS="-j2". The other should be on a system with dual processors at half the speed of the first system, with MAKEOPTS="-j3".

      I ran something like this a while back; a dual p3-500 just about matched a single p4-1.5.

      With some "real" benchmarks, we'd at least be able to weigh this 6GHz beast against a dual 3GHz beast...

      --
      ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
    6. Re:Erm... by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
      > sure hope they were using Gentoo, because if not they couldn't take advantage of those incredible speeds with some hot -O3 -funroll-loops action :P

      Don't forget -march=pentium2

    7. Re:Erm... by _Pablo · · Score: 3, Funny

      The CPU-Z shots very strongly suggest it's running in windows. But just maybe it's a VM on Linux, or Wine or some other reason to mention Linux on slashdot!

      It's a shame the pi calc shot is done when it's running at 5.4Ghz instead of the arbitrary 6Ghz...

      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    8. Re:Erm... by lphuberdeau · · Score: 1

      Actually, the images show they were using windows...

      --
      Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
      PHP Queb
    9. Re:Erm... by NetCow · · Score: 0, Troll

      I can't really believe that, unless you ran your hard drive(s) in PIO mode and kept on poking them while running the bootstrap. A dual SMP system has around 85-90% of a processor of the same generation but with double the speed. In your example, two P3/500 should about have matched an 1 GHz P3, and that's *about*. More realistically, they'd have run on par with a 900 MHz P3. There is no *way* that a dual P3/500 system will match an 1 GHz P4, not to speak of your claims of beating an 1.5 GHz P4.

    10. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...they could've probably bought a couple more CPUs and had a proper SMP system instead."

      And I'm sure that would have gotten them a write-up on slashdot wouldn't it? Man, the Guiness Book of Records must just confuzzle the fuck out of you eh?

    11. Re:Erm... by _Pablo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clock for clock, the final P3 (the Pentium III S) would smoke the original P4 (Willamete) no questions asked. So it's quite possible dual P3/500s could have beaten a 1.5Ghz P4 on many benchmarks.

      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    12. Re:Erm... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny

      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness. For sheer geek pride, sure, why not? But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance

      Damn. I was hoping to buy a $99 liquid nitrogen cooling kit at CompUSA tomorrow. :)

    13. Re:Erm... by 10scjed · · Score: 5, Funny

      wow, windows at 6GHz, think of how much spyware it would take to finally slow it down...

      --
      --10scjed IANAL,AFAIK
    14. Re:Erm... by smurf975 · · Score: 1

      Neither in a heavy multi-threaded enverionment?

      --
      -- I don't buy it, I grow it.
    15. Re:Erm... by justkarl · · Score: 5, Funny

      and using a 6Ghz cpu w/ 512 ram...

      Guess they got Longhorn running, eh?

    16. Re:Erm... by EinarH · · Score: 5, Informative
      There is no *way* that a dual P3/500 system will match an 1 GHz P4, not to speak of your claims of beating an 1.5 GHz P4.
      Sure it is.
      The first Pentium 4 CPU was slow compared with a P3 1 GHz. One would belive that a 1.5GHz CPU would beat the last generations 1 GHz CPU, but in many tasks the P3 was faster.
      -The P3 pipeline had 12 stages the P4 had 20.
      -The P3 Katmai had 512k L2 cache, the P4 had only 256k. I remember some MySQL benchmarks showing a single P3 500 MHz Katmai beating a P4 1400 MHz in some tasks.

      So even with all the IDE stuff enabled a Dual P3 could be faster than a P4 in Gentooing.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    17. Re:Erm... by lphuberdeau · · Score: 1

      I think 3 would be enough...

      --
      Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
      PHP Queb
    18. Re:Erm... by berkut7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason why they run with so little memory is the same why they are using a cheap video card: there is a chance they might kill it. The other more important reason is that they can reach higher FSB clocks with less memory sticks. I fthey had two or more memory sticks they would be able to reach same FSB speeds, an in turn, same CPU clock speeds.

    19. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness.

      To handle getting slashdotted.

    20. Re:Erm... by henryhbk · · Score: 1

      And a 333mhz FSB?

    21. Re:Erm... by NetCow · · Score: 1

      Even there. It's pretty hard to write multithreaded programs right. Many implementations use mutexes and spinlocks, and those are hit heavily on SMP system due to cache coherency issues.

    22. Re:Erm... by NetCow · · Score: 1

      Nod, point taken - however CPU activity resulting from compiling is very differently patterned than database activity. I still maintain that there is no way a dual P3/500MHz would beat a single P4/1.5GHz. For reference, I own a dual P3/500 (Katmai) system and used to own a 2 GHz P4 system - 512M RAM in both cases. Never benchmarked the Gentoo bootstrapping on either one, but the P4 definitely felt faster.

    23. Re:Erm... by aklix · · Score: 2, Funny

      It ran, but then decided it couldn't run on a system that slow.

    24. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For sheer geek pride, sure, why not?"

      Exactly that, 'I broke 6Ghz first.' Sure you could have gotten better value for your money, but if you have the curiousity and the money to blow, why not?

    25. Re:Erm... by geeber · · Score: 1

      Who cares about compiling when they could be playing Doom3? Finally, a system that will get decent FPS.

    26. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the katmai cache (512kb) operates on half the speed of the coppermine one (256kb), so they perform exactly the same.

    27. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think harder. My 6-disk RAID array across dual Ultra-160 SCSI channels on a dual 800MHz machine will compile kernels faster than a 3GHz P4 writing to a single IDE channel drive, I bet.

      The task he mentions is I/O bound, not CPU bound.

    28. Re:Erm... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try running doom3 over 35 fps.

    29. Re:Erm... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      1. You are an ignorant intel fanboy. Not all CPUs are created equal. The Pentium M beats the crap out of a Pentium IV of the same clock rate. Pentium M is based on Pentium 3. Pentium 3 is known to beat Pentium 4 at the same clock rate, varying from slightly when you compare new P4 to old P3, and dramatically when you compare late P3 to early P4.
      2. your sig is stupid. If anything it should be /mnt/earth or, far more applicable, earth:/ (hopefully not mounted -t nfs.)
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Erm... by M51DPS · · Score: 1

      (many years ago)

      Why on earth would anyone need a processor that fast? There's really no reason why someone would realistically use anything like that. The only people using a 100 MHz processor would be a computer scientist.

    31. Re:Erm... by NetCow · · Score: 1

      1. Er, if you read carefully again (or, to be more precise, probablyt for the *first* time), I specifically used the past tense in relation to the P4. My main system currently is a dual Opteron.
      2. Of course, you're entitled to your opinion.

    32. Re:Erm... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In all seriousness, this is pretty amazing, but I can't really see the usefulness.

      Since when is usefulness all there is to life?

      Can you see the usefulness in climbing Everest, running around in a circle several times at the Olympics, or anything else?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    33. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does that mean they perform the same? It seems to me that they just have different advantages and disadvantages.

    34. Re:Erm... by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Funny

      To pick up chicks, obviously.

      Haven't been on a date lately, have you?

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    35. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you got the joke, and then felt it necessary to explain it to all of us.

    36. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as far as I can tell the expense involved outweighs any gain in performance

      Do you have a cheaper way to build a 6GHz computer?

    37. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only chick you'll ever pick up with that is Kelly LeBrock.

      I was excited for a moment, too. And then I thought... do I really want to be in there after Seagal?

      Under Siege?

      The sequel?

      No, I suppose I don't.

      Nevermind!

    38. Re:Erm... by ionpro · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's 333Mhz BEFORE clock-quadding. So it's actually an effective FSB of 1332Mhz. This probably isn't the highest FSB overclock achieved so far, but it is unusual to get such a high overclock on the top of the line (i.e. highest multiplier) chip.

    39. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Like crap... Only a half gig of ram? That would bairly run Solitare featuring clippy.

    40. Re:Erm... by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      wow, windows at 6GHz, think of how much spyware it would take to finally slow it down...

      Spyware, feh. Just launch MS Word.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    41. Re:Erm... by ZeNTuRe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have 3 Dual P2-300MHz boxes (6*300MHz total), and using distcc or bruteforcing with john they beat a 3.4GHz P4.

      --
      Did they touch God or did they touch the Sun?
    42. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guy's are both wrong. The hard drive performance will grossly outweigh the CPU performance by many orders of magnitude in a benchmark of 'emerge world'.

      A P3/600mhz with 15,000 rpm SCSI-3 drive will smoke that 6GZ machine with a 7200rpm S-ATA drive in any compilation test; compilation is simply more I/O bound than it is CPU bound.

    43. Re:Erm... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Actually it's just a copper tube with a flat face that touches the CPU. I'm sure you could just immerse the whole mobo in a pool of LN2 and you'd be fine. LN2 cooling is cheap, just very very inconvenient.

      --
      My other car is first.
    44. Re:Erm... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you could just immerse the whole mobo in a pool of LN2 and you'd be fine.

      The mobo would crack at that temperature.

      Immersing it in a circulating bath of glycol would work though (unless glycol is electrically conductive).

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    45. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you see the usefulness in climbing Everest, running around in a circle several times at the Olympics, or anything else?
      yes! while they are running in circles, they can't interfer with people doing usefull activities.

    46. Re:Erm... by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot - s/lately/never/

    47. Re:Erm... by julesh · · Score: 2

      True, but I would assume that for the sake of benchmarking that both machines are tested with equivalent spec hard drives and motherboards, so IO would become less of an issue.

      Note also that disk cache behaviour would become critical. Tuning of 'swappiness' to the task at hand would probably have drastic affects on the time taken.

    48. Re:Erm... by julesh · · Score: 1

      The P4 architecture had two major problems; the cache size which has already been mentioned, and the lack of a shifter, making LEA and similar instructions many times slower than on the P3. LEA is a very useful instruction for performing text processing, and I would hazard a guess that it is used _a lot_ by gcc. It's probably not so heavily used in GUI code and during application startup, which is where you would naturally feel the difference.

    49. Re:Erm... by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to learn a bit more about why caching works before making statements like that.

      Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that main memory is 10 times slower than the slower cache, and that half the cache size means twice as many cache misses (the real figures are actually worse than this, but I don't know what they are exactly).

      So, we have:

      Main memory access time: 20 units
      Small cache access time: 1 unit
      Large cache access time: 2 units

      Over the course of 100 memory access, lets say 10 of these are misses with the large cache, and based on our assumptions above 20 are misses with the small cache.

      Small cache total time: 20*20 + 80*1 = 480
      Large cache total time: 10*20 + 90*2 = 380

      So, in this situation the large slow cache clearly performs better. In other situations, you might be able to make the small fast cache perform better (e.g. lower number of cache misses, presumably due to applications with smaller working set sizes, or faster main memory might help here).

    50. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every benchmark I've seen shows Northwood to beat PIII "clock-for-clock". YMMV.

    51. Re:Erm... by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      They seem to be running 512MB of RAM in dual channel mode, that really does not seem like a small amount of RAM to me.

    52. Re:Erm... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Heh.

      At my last job, we had a 4x300mhz ultra SPARC II that could compile code faster than our 1.5Ghz Pentium 4, while only using one processor. I think that chip just wasn't very good for ... well, a lot of stuff. The branch checks and the pipeline flushes on a missed prediction and whatnot hadn't been intirely sorted out by the time they put it out, I think.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    53. Re:Erm... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      The P3 Katmai had 512k L2 cache, the P4 had only 256k.

      The P4 had 256K Level-2 cache, and only like 8K "trace cache" for Level-1 cache. Ugh.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    54. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's useful, they're getting ready for longhorn already

    55. Re:Erm... by magarity · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see would be a benchmark 'emerge system'

      A heck of a lot of that procedure is disk intensive as well as CPU so there really isn't much added benefit in doing that on a 6GHz CPU with a (relatively) measly 1MB cache, 512MB of RAM, and standard disk drives. Sure, some, but not as much as some people would expect.

    56. Re:Erm... by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      it is unusual to get such a high overclock on the top of the line (i.e. highest multiplier) chip.

      I thought so too. I wonder if they tried (fried?) more than one chip before getting a winner? (yeah I did RTFA. If it was there I didn't notice..)

    57. Re:Erm... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      There are no equivalent-spec motherboards for P3 and P4, they use entirely different chipsets. Plus, P4s are memory bandwidth starved with SDR DRAM and P3s are not, so saddling them both with a 133 MHz tested 440BX chipset isn't a fair test anyhow.

      Also remember that back in the early P4 days, they were all SDR or RAMBUS. A 1.5 GHz P4 on a DDR motherboard (even single channel) is going to be significantly faster than the same chip on an SDR motherboard. It'll be similar to (and much cheaper than) a RAMBUS motherboard. But in those early days, who was gonna shell out the big bucks for RAMBUS memory and board, and then stick a 1.5 GHz chip in it?

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    58. Re:Erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you hit template laden C++ code. Then you're CPU bound or RAM bound. Occasionally you'll even end up memory bandwidth bound; reading and writing the 1.5Gigs of ram used compiling complex Blitz++ code takes a while!

      The obese 60 meg .o file it shits out at the end is nothing compared to the gigs of RAM it churned through repeatedly on the way there.

    59. Re:Erm... by julesh · · Score: 1

      There are no equivalent-spec motherboards for P3 and P4, they use entirely different chipsets.

      Equivalent spec doesn't mean identical. I'm sure you could find a P3 and a P4 motherboard that have approximately equal IO performance when you run a disk benchmark over them to the same disk. This would be good enough.

  3. Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by prestwich · · Score: 4, Informative

    So P4's double clock their ALUs - that means that ALU is shifting at > 12GHz.

    Welcome to measuring your operations in picoseconds.

    1. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by prestwich · · Score: 1

      Erm I mean in lets see - ~80ps/clock?

    2. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the ALU's in Prescott don't even use a clock! It uses self resetting domino logic, so the speed is completely based on the manufacturing process and the speed of the transistors. Damn hard things to make, even harder to formally verify that they will always work, and as far as I know Intel is the only CPU manufacturer in the world to use something like this in a mass-produced product. So you can really say that the ALU is working at >12GHz or whatever since it isn't clocked. Oh, and Intel has been measuring their operation time in picoseconds for a while now ;)

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    3. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but the logic at the front and back only supplies 2 operations per cycle (and you can only run it at double speed if you do 16-bit operations).

    5. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually that was a marketing gag, its running at the same speed but has 2 alu cores

    6. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      Not in Prescott it is not.

    7. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your blatant ripoff of Simpsons material intrigues me and I wish to see you in court.

      -FOX

    8. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Bender_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting, how is it synchronized with the rest of the pipeline? Is there any publication about this?

    9. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Self resetting domino logic has been known about for a while now (I think since mid 90's), but Intel was the first company to actually do something useful with it in a real product. Synchronizing it to the rest of this chip shouldn't be that hard if you understand domino logic and use memory cells at the input and output ports of the ALU. I personally don't know exactly HOW they do that, but that's my best guess.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    10. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      Ok, thats common knowledge. But how do you know it is actually being used in the prescott? The former P4 revisions used a doubleclocked alu with an interlocked pipeline. They only computed 16bits of the result in each stage and pipelined the carry.

      The question of synchronising is quite interesting in my opinion. An efficient, but complicated way would be to use a FIFO that is clocked at one end and self triggered at the other. This would ensure maximum throughput.

      The straightforward way would be clocked registers. This would lower the throughput but possibly also decrease latency.

    11. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, I.. um... just know that Intel has the ALU like that, and let's leave it at that ;)

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    12. Re:Don't forget the dual clocked ALU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do 2 dependent back-to-back alu operations in 1 clock. Therefore, the ALU runs at 12GHz.

      Oh, and the self-resetting domino logic is only used on Willamette and Northwood. Prescott uses a more scalable circuit technology which I am not going to disclose to slashdot :)

      And yes, picosecond timing has been in use for quite a long time now :)

  4. All of that speed... by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 2, Funny
    calculates pi

    Just to figure out the answer to a problem every 8th grader knows.

    1. Re:All of that speed... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding. I could have told them that it was 3 and they would have saved so much time and money.

    2. Re:All of that speed... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      It's not 3!

      It's 22/7!

    3. Re:All of that speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22/7 is an aproximation, its fucking close, but not exact

    4. Re:All of that speed... by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      no crap, genius. its called a joke.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    5. Re:All of that speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PI IS EXACTLY THREE!!!

      Now that I have your attention...

    6. Re:All of that speed... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      C'mon. Pi is an irrational number

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:All of that speed... by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 0

      no it is ~ 3.14159265358979323846

      rounded to the 20th decimal place. Yes, I memorized pi to the 20th decimal place and i'm currently working on e.

      I am a true nerd!

      --
      "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
    8. Re:All of that speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it take longer to over clock the P4 or memorize pi to the 20th decimal pt.???

    9. Re:All of that speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      -1 Flamebait for saying pi is an irrational number? Geez why not mod the guy down for saying two is an even number. Stupid mods.

    10. Re:All of that speed... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      lol thanks dude! moderators are smoking something good this time... I can buy "off topic" or "over rated" but flamebait?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  5. Just in time... by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 5, Funny

    With winter coming and the price of oil approaching $50, you can now safely turn off your heater and just point the vent of your 6Ghz P4 into the middle of the room...or maybe run a venting system off of it connected to the heat ducts in your house...

    1. Re:Just in time... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Nope, don't think so. The actual temperature is between -90C and -130C, so this would be more useful on those hot days.

    2. Re:Just in time... by Carrion+Creeper · · Score: 1

      With winter coming and the price of oil approaching $50, you can now safely turn off your heater and just point the vent of your 6Ghz P4 into the middle of the room...or maybe run a venting system off of it connected to the heat ducts in your house...

      What Ars-Fartsica means to say is that he gets electricity in his lease. Ars also likes to heat his room by opening his fridge in the middle of the room.

    3. Re:Just in time... by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      But what if you just want to get warm and not have 3rd degree burns?

    4. Re:Just in time... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      the price of oil approaching $50

      Who uses petroleum-based home-heating anyways?

      Yes I know it was a joke. Just call me Dr. Killjoy.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Just in time... by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Out in the boonies it's very common to run oil for heat (in addition to wood).

    6. Re:Just in time... by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boonies? I live in the city and we have oil heat. It's quite common in the northeast.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    7. Re:Just in time... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Since heating oil costs a whole 2% more per BTU than natural gas this year and has a much lower install cost it's pretty popular in areas without the sunk infrastructure costs. Not only that but domestic production is already spoken for so increased use of natural gas would require increased infrastructure for importation. Cost figures obtained here.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Just in time... by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      Ars also likes to heat his room by opening his fridge in the middle of the room

      You know what, that idea would actually work.

    9. Re:Just in time... by the+guy+on+the+couch · · Score: 1

      Almost everyone uses petroleum for home heating. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oi =defmore&q=define:petroleum

  6. doom 3 by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Funny

    ok, yes, doom 3 has some pretty high sys requirements to run smoothly, but isn't this going a wee bit overboard?

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:doom 3 by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think this MAY just reach those requirements ;)

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:doom 3 by Maul · · Score: 1

      Not really. They may even be able to get above 10 FPS with this thing!

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    3. Re:doom 3 by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      time for them to give deus ex 2 a try

    4. Re:doom 3 by NtroP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, this is in preparation for Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    5. Re:doom 3 by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

      "Here's your hanging chad sketch, Krusty." --The Simpsons

    6. Re:doom 3 by murdocj · · Score: 1

      I ran DE2 on a 3 year old machine. It ran ok. Wasn't nearly as good as the original tho.

    7. Re:doom 3 by EvilAardvark · · Score: 1

      Actually you're going to be wanting a heater when hell freezes over.

  7. calculate pi... by spacemky · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look how fast I can calculate pi:

    3.1415927

    wow, that was fast.

    --
    640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
    1. Re:calculate pi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You missed some digits at the end.

    2. Re:calculate pi... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      That's ALL you got? Damn you're slow, I calculated this in the same time:

      3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    3. Re:calculate pi... by Cygnus78 · · Score: 1

      But do you remember them in your head ? One day I had nothing to do so I memorized the first 100 decimals. Unfortunately I do not remember them all anymore.

    4. Re:calculate pi... by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      Instead of the "pi" benchmark, can these guys to join my Folding@HOME team!?!

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    5. Re:calculate pi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Memorizing pi is easy, once you've learnt the pattern.

    6. Re:calculate pi... by blixel · · Score: 1

      Memorizing pi is easy, once you've learnt the pattern.

      Haha, now that was funny.

    7. Re:calculate pi... by NonSequor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, he could be serious. There's a very simple formula for any arbitrary digit of pi in base 16.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    8. Re:calculate pi... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Cool. I can now calculate pi to as many decimal places as I want.

      Only problem is that it is then in hex. I guess that is great for impressing geeks....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    9. Re:calculate pi... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      As opposed to calculating pi in decimal, which is great for impressing...geeks?

    10. Re:calculate pi... by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have been looking into this and it doesn;t work for arbitrary digits of pi, at least not as a simple formula fur such. The problem is that you have an infinite sum of fractions multiplied by 16 to a negative power.

      So, you still have much computational work to do...

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    11. Re:calculate pi... by denlin · · Score: 1

      You missed some digits at the end.

      At Carnegie Mellon University, on March 14 (in celebration of the birthdays of Albert Einstein and Waclaw Sierpinski - famed for his factal gasket), we also celebrate "pi-day". It's an attempt to write pi out to as many digits as possible on the sidewalks of the campus. In 2003, a group of students managed to write pi out to 8192 digits...I'm not sure how many digits were calculated & written on the sidewalks this year, but i suspect they broke last years record.

      --
      Yes, I have RTFA. Yes, I have a girlfriend. Yes, I'm new here. And no, I don't want a free iPod.
    12. Re:calculate pi... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Memorising pi is easy, provided you count in base pi.

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    13. Re:calculate pi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It looks like a geometric series, with |r| less than 1, so its going to converge. There's a closed formula for it, like a*[1/(1-r)] -- or something like that.

    14. Re:calculate pi... by psm321 · · Score: 1

      I always thought March 14 was pi day because it's 3-14 ... didn't realize it was a brthday celebration.

    15. Re:calculate pi... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      It converges on pi.

      Already I wrote a simple bc script to calculate n digits of pi using this script.

      10000 digits of pi takes a long time to calculate on an Athlon 800 BTW....

      For those who are interested, here is the code (with some debugging and progress info in it):

      define next_piece(x){
      np = (4/(8*x+1)-2/(8*x+4)-1/(8*x+5)-1/(8*x+6))*(1/(16^x ))
      return np
      }

      sc=read()

      scale=sc + 2
      ln = scale/1.5

      p = 0

      l = 0
      while (1){
      np = next_piece(l)
      if (np == 0) break
      p += np
      ++l
      }

      np
      p

      quit

      Note that the last two digits are included solely to help offset rounding error issues.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    16. Re:calculate pi... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      I think you may be able to do the individual sub calculations modulo base 16, or something like that. That way you are only doing the calculations for the last digit, which is the n'th digit of PI.

      So I'm sure that there's a trick to it.

      You still have to do ~n calculations for the nth digit, but you don't have to store the whole number while you are working on, so it should be very fast.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  8. Updating Wikipedia Now by rudy_wayne · · Score: 0, Troll


    In the category "Way too much free time on their hands"

  9. Tops 6ghz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it tops 6 GHz, but they only calculate pi at 5.4 GHz? Sounds like the only thing it can run at 6 GHz without crashing is CPU-Z...

    1. Re:Tops 6ghz? by Wtcher · · Score: 1

      Reading through their thread, it seems they had it even faster than 6GHz at one point but the system crashed trying to take a screenshot. >_

      --
      ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    2. Re:Tops 6ghz? by Andypro · · Score: 0

      Erm, actually no. Their unstable screenshot of 6009.8 MHz is actually around 5.87 GHz, NOT over 6 GHz. However, it's quite possible that clock frequency isn't the 'binary' mega and giga that describes HD and RAM capacity, in which case you can ignore this post :p I just assumed that since clock ticks values are binary, perhaps the ticks/second should also be.

    3. Re:Tops 6ghz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !!

      This is the second post making the same error. Did the chutzpahs that wrote up the original article claim that 6000/1024MHz = 6GHz? Because, if they did, they are complete and utter morons.

      1 Hz = 1/s. 6000MHz = 6GHz, not 5.87GHz or some other arbitrary value.

      Byte counts are the *only measurement* that uses 2^10, 2^20, 2^30, etc. powers instead of 10^1, 10^2, 10^3, for the very reason that the address lines on your memory bus are either 'on' or 'off' and there is no realistic way to get a byte count in powers of ten.

    4. Re:Tops 6ghz? by CaptDeuce · · Score: 1

      I'm not impressed. The announcement is titled "The magic 'Six' (6GHz) has been broken". Doesn't sound like magic to me. I'm waiting for the Truly Magical® 666GHz to be broken.

      --
      "Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein
  10. Only 5.4GHz by mind21_98 · · Score: 1

    The pi screenshot's only showing 5.4GHz. Is this a mistake?

    1. Re:Only 5.4GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the first one. They must have lowered it a bit to calculate pi since it was probably unstable at 6GHz or something.

    2. Re:Only 5.4GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that the actual sustained speed was probably lower then 6GHz, but the peak speed topped out at 6GHz.

    3. Re:Only 5.4GHz by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Informative

      As the AC already said, it's not stable at 6Ghz, from the article:

      Not bench stable - just a screenshot record :)

      The CPU powersupply seems to require quite a bit of modding in order to bench past 5.4GHz.

  11. skynet ensues... by sciguy125 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we need to stop making our computers go so fast. We're only making things easier for Skynet.

    --
    GE/S/P a- e++ y-- r-- s:++ d+ h! X+++ t++ C+ P+ L++ E W++ w M-- V? PS+ P+
    1. Re:skynet ensues... by Etienne+Steward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new 6GHz overlords...

    2. Re:skynet ensues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention how many humans are going to be needed to be plugged into the matrix just to power one of these things.

    3. Re:skynet ensues... by NTiOzymandias · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the cooling system is its own built-in precautionary measure against such an occurence. It has a built-in supply of liquid nitrogen!

      "Hasta la vista, baby."

    4. Re:skynet ensues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm doing my part then, doing my work on a 1.789Mhz 6502.

      Oh wait, the original Terminator used a 6502. Damn. :-)

  12. Don't forget the other milestones by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    Because if 6Ghz has been broken then so has the 4Ghz and 5Ghz barriers.

    1. Re:Don't forget the other milestones by Rii · · Score: 0

      5Ghz was broken a while ago, with another LN2 experiment. I think it was done by tech TV... I remember they had a big copper pipe full of it sitting above the CPU.

    2. Re:Don't forget the other milestones by ValiantSoul · · Score: 1

      Some Germans did it too awhile ago, the video is at tomshardware

  13. In layman's terms... by xactuary · · Score: 3, Funny

    their scroll bar works faster than yours.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  14. Throughput not clock speed by crashnbur · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, so it's fast. How much can it handle?

    Processor speed envy is like penis envy. The bigger it looks, the better it seems, but just as size can be less important than how you use it, speed can be less important if bandwidth is wimpy.

    1. Re:Throughput not clock speed by PureCreditor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the physical speed limitations of hard drives (sustained read/write, not SATA) is the real wimpy part of the bandwidth....

      when running multi-gigabyte SQL queries (at work, our entire RDBMS is about 1TB), the crawling speeds of the hard drive is evident. the time it takes to develop the SQL query and the time it takes to run it are comparable (btw, the queries are okay optimized)

      6GHz might be useful for 3D rendering jobs or obsessive gamers, but for the bulk of the business world, the HDD is still the pain in the a**

    2. Re:Throughput not clock speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Processor speed envy is like penis envy. The bigger it looks, the better it seems, but just as size can be less important than how you use it, speed can be less important if bandwidth is wimpy. So you're saying you have a small penis?

    3. Re:Throughput not clock speed by gazoombo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed the FSB is still only running @ 333. ..

      --
      John Hancock
    4. Re:Throughput not clock speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly.

    5. Re:Throughput not clock speed by notanatheist · · Score: 2

      What you missed is the P4 runs on a 200Mhz FSB x4. 333 x4 with an 18x multplier gets your roughly 6Ghz.

  15. now gimme that without the LN2 by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 1

    Holy Crap, tht is fast. When can i get speeds like that without the LN2?!?!

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    1. Re:now gimme that without the LN2 by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Check the year 2006. They should have it.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  16. I wonder how fast you can get a BSoD on this baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just think of the potential.

  17. hmmm... by jjeffries · · Score: 5, Funny
    take a look at how fast it calculates pi

    I hope it's a substantial improvement over my machine... Seems like I've been waiting forever for it to finish...

    1. Re:hmmm... by kzinti · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems like I've been waiting forever for it to finish...

      May be, but at least it keeps your memory banks free of bloodthirsty demons like Boradis, Keslack, and Rejick.

    2. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought pi was irrational? How could a machine "calculate pi" unless a) the machine was running forever or b) the calculations were performed in a continuum rather than the discrete world of 0 and 1.

    3. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this pi? Is it good or is it whacked?

    4. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Huh? It only takes a couple of seconds to execute on my machine:

      grep 'Value of pi' bible.txt
      3.0

  18. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your probably just jealous you didn't try the idea yourself.

  19. why doesn't anyone do a dualie? by caldfyr · · Score: 1

    Getting a single proc that high is cool, but I've love to see 2 opturons or xeons overclocked insanely high.

  20. Uhm... by empiricistrob · · Score: 1

    I'm sure chemists love to make catchy abbreviations for common substances. I've never heard a chemist call liquid nitrogen anything but liquid nitrogen.

    1. Re:Uhm... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Yeah liquid nitrogen it's like, as common as water. AFAIK LN2 is more of an engineering
      abbreviation but I have definitely heard it used.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah liquid nitrogen it's like, as common as water. AFAIK LN2 is more of an engineering
      > abbreviation but I have definitely heard it used.

      Yeah, liquid nitrogen, it's like, totally as common as water, y'know? AFAIK, gag me with a spoon, but LN2 is totally more of a, like, engineering abbreviation, but I have totally like definitely heard it used, like y'know?

  21. Pi has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but don't worry I got a copy.

    3.
    1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989

    3809525720 1065485863 2788659361 5338182796 8230301952 0353018529 6899577362 2599413891 2497217752 8347913151 5574857242 4541506959 5082953311 6861727855 8890750983 8175463746 4939319255 0604009277 0167113900 9848824012 8583616035 6370766010 4710181942 9555961989 4676783744 9448255379 7747268471 0404753464 6208046684 2590694912 9331367702 8989152104 7521620569 6602405803 8150193511 2533824300 3558764024 7496473263 9141992726 0426992279 6782354781 6360093417 2164121992 4586315030 2861829745 5570674983 8505494588 5869269956 9092721079 7509302955 3211653449 8720275596 0236480665 4991198818 3479775356 6369807426 5425278625 5181841757 4672890977 7727938000 8164706001 6145249192 1732172147 7235014144 1973568548 1613611573 5255213347 5741849468 4385233239 0739414333 4547762416 8625189835 6948556209 9219222184 2725502542 5688767179 0494601653 4668049886 2723279178 6085784383 8279679766 8145410095 3883786360 9506800642 2512520511 7392984896 0841284886 2694560424 1965285022 2106611863 0674427862 2039194945 0471237137 8696095636 4371917287 4677646575 7396241389 0865832645 9958133904 7802759009

    9465764078 9512694683 9835259570 9825822620 5224894077 2671947826 8482601476 9909026401 3639443745 5305068203 4962524517 4939965143 1429809190 6592509372 2169646151 5709858387 4105978859 5977297549 8930161753 9284681382 6868386894 2774155991 8559252459 5395943104 9972524680 8459872736 4469584865 3836736222 6260991246 0805124388 4390451244 1365497627 8079771569 1435997700 1296160894 4169486855 5848406353 4220722258 2848864815 8456028506 0168427394 5226746767 8895252138 5225499546 6672782398 6456596116 3548862305 7745649803 5593634568 1743241125 1507606947 9451096596 0940252288 7971089314 5669136867 2287489405 6010150330 8617928680 9208747609 1782493858 9009714909 6759852613 6554978189 3129784821 6829989487 2265880485 7564014270 4775551323 7964145152 3746234364 5428584447 9526586782 1051141354 7357395231 1342716610 2135969536 2314429524 8493718711 0145765403 5902799344 0374200731 0578539062 1983874478 0847848968 3321445713 8687519435 0643021845 3191048481 0053706146 8067491927 8191197939 9520614196 6342875444 0643745123 7181921799 9839101591 9561814675 1426912397 4894090718 6494231961

    5679452080 9514655022 5231603881 9301420937 6213785595 6638937787 0830390697 9207734672 2182562599 6615014215 0306803844 7734549202 6054146659 2520149744 2850732518 6660021324 3408819071 0486331734 6496514539 0579626856 1005508106 6587969981 6357473638 4052571459 1028970641 4011097120 6280439039 7595156771 5770042033 7869936007 2305587631 7635942187 3125147120 5329281918 2618612586 7321579198 4148488291 6447060957 5270695722 0917567116 7229109816 9091528017 3506712748 5832228718 3520935396 5725121083 5791513698 8209144421 0067510334 6711031412 6711136990 8658516398 3150197016 5151168517 1437657618 3515565088 4909989859 9823873455 2833163550 7647918535 8932261854 8963213293 3089857064 2046752590 7091548141 6549859461 63

    1. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, could you round that up for me please?

      Somewhere around the 1300th decimal place would be nice.

    2. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by MBCook · · Score: 3, Funny

      You got part of it wrong.

      The part where you have "...5...", that should be "...7..."

      Have a nice day ;)

      (he he he)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Bryan_W · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed a few at the end

    4. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by daniel23 · · Score: 1


      I think you might have a typo there, ahh, just a second while I finish comparing it...

      --
      605413? Yes, it's a prime.
    5. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you expect? He was using one of the first pentiums.

    6. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by jeremy_dot · · Score: 1

      The server seems to be taking the slashdotting fairly well.

      Obligatory: I bet you can't guess what system the server's running on.

    7. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 0

      You Bastard!
      I had comment overflow disabled.

      --
      Sig
    8. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by AgBullet · · Score: 2, Funny

      I use e, you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Celsius10 · · Score: 1

      That's my root password you insensitive clod! --

      --
      "Little things hitting each other. THAT'S WHAT I LIKE!" - Time Bandits
    10. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, the numerical sequence you've posted has been patented and copyrighted. You are in violation of the DMCA. Consider this your cease and desist order.

    11. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm.. pie..

    12. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      memo to self: you still lose your previous moderations even if you post anon. Bugger.

    13. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by bairy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah like that's impressive compared to this

      --


      Get paid to search..It's geniune and
    14. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by gutman · · Score: 0

      "Read the rest of this comment" link is hilarious in this context!

    15. Re:Pi has been slashdotted by randomblast · · Score: 1

      hmmm... is this a reverse slashdotting?

      --
      ...these aren't my real teeth.
  22. 6 GHz is not that impressive. by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    At 6 GHz, the only applications that can show appreciable performance improvement are CPU-bound ones. Hence, a program that sits entirely in the on-chip cache will show significant improvement. An example of such a program is the one calculating the value of pi.

    Memory-bound applications will not show significant improvement. At 6 GHz, most applications become memory bound since memory becomes extremely slow in responding to the 6 GHz processor.

    Has anyone liquid cooled the G5 and the Opteron driven them to 6 GHz? I bet that the G5 could crush the Pentium in performance since the G5 has a powerful floating point unit.

    1. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Wtcher · · Score: 1

      It does seem that they overclocked their bus as well, though, not just the CPU.

      --
      ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    2. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by PureCreditor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nearly any other CPU architecture running at 6GHz will muder the P4's performance in either integer or float-point, partially due to Prescott's insanely long 31-stage pipeline and relatively week parallelism

      also, the P4 excels only in programs so small it can fit in the really small L1 cache. AMD's L1 cache is the really juicy one. =)

      Intel designed the Pentium 4 solely around marketing's requirements of consumer hype instead of sound technical choices.

    3. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1, Troll

      >nearly any other CPU architecture running at 6GHz will muder the P4's

      Good luck getting the G5/Opertron to run at this speed. Hell, even half that speed.

    4. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how does that help if the DRAM cannot fetch that fast? hmm, your a bright one.

    5. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Raw clock doesn't count, only the percentile increase. I don't see why an Opteron/AMD64 couldn't be clocked to 180% with lN2.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    6. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      half that speed is 3 GHz......the G5 is 500 MHz away from there now...I bet an LN2 cooled G5 would run at 4-5 GHz easy.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by ameoba · · Score: 1

      This, percentage-wise, isn't all that impressive of an overclock; we're only looking at 170% of the stock speeds. The top-end Opteron/Athlon64 would only have to hit 4GHZ to match the same percentage. Hitting half this speed is only a 25% overclock for the top-of-the-line chips - easily doable with normal air cooling.

      Granted, with the onboard memory controller, you'd probably have to use a multiplier-unlocked chip like the Athlon 64 FX series, but since the new chips are shipping on the same process that this P4 was made on, I wouldn't be suprised if some dedicated OCers would be able to put the AMD part to an even higher percentage of it's stock speed.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    8. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Wtcher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The DRAM may not be able to fetch that fast, but an increased bus rate will still provide some mediocum of bonus performance. Still, I notice now that the FSB clock was not increased at all.

      So long as some effective pre-fetching is in place, there's going to be some asymmetric performance gains. It won't be 1:1 since the memory isn't actually getting any faster, but it doesn't matter so long as the data is where it needs to be when it's needed. In any case, the fact is having the CPU far outstrip the performance of the rest of the system isn't a particularly unusual occurrence.

      --
      ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    9. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by matyas47 · · Score: 1

      Can you overclock a G5? I didn't know that Macs (or IBM workstations, for that matter) could be overclocked at all.

    10. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Fancia · · Score: 1

      I know that G4s can be overclocked; I've heard of several AmigaOne users running their 7455 G4s at 1GHz.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    11. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      mediocum

      Umm, I believe you meant modicum.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    12. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by M51DPS · · Score: 1

      The problem is, who the heck knows enough FORTRAN to go into open-firmware and overclock a G5? I've been trying to figure out....

    13. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Stickerboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Has anyone liquid cooled the G5 and the Opteron driven them to 6 GHz? I bet that the G5 could crush the Pentium in performance since the G5 has a powerful floating point unit.

      Your geek license has just been revoked.

      The overall design idea behind the P4 was to stretch out the pipeline to an insane level in order to ramp up clockspeeds to an insane level.

      No one's liquid cooled a G5 or an Opteron and overclocked it to 6 GHz. Why? Because their design matched with current chip fabbing technology can't handle it.

      The good news for AMD and PowerPC fanboys is that they won't need to get it to 6 GHz. If someone overclocks an Athlon 64 to, oh, 4 GHz or so (which would be impressive enough), the Athlon, which is designed to accomplish more clock for clock than the P4, should shred the 6 GHz P4 in performance.

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    14. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much. This should be self-evident to anyone who took highschool chemistry. The rate at which any chemical reaction takes place is governed by the slowest step of the reaction.

      In any process where you have a series of linked events (i.e. one event depends on the results of a previous event and must wait for it to finish), you will at best get marginal gains from improving the speed of anything other than the slowest event.

      The only useful benchmarks of a computer's performance are those that only measure the performance of the components that become bottlenecks under normal use. Anything else is crap.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    15. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "your a bright one"

      so good!

    16. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it would still be a Mac ;p

    17. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Wtcher · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you. :) ...learn something new everyday.

      --
      ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    18. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well they wouldn't get very far with FORTRAN, as OFW uses Forth :)

    19. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Fortran, huh? Pretty much every (physical sciences) scientist educated within the last few decades should have at least a working knowledge of Fortran. For my part, we had to learn it as part of our Physics degrees, although the year I graduated they started teaching C instead (as well?) to the first years, so more recent grads may not have had much exposure to it...

      It's a moot point though, as open-firmware is written in Forth :-)

    20. Re:6 GHz is not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a contribution to the discussion. Your a fucking genius.

  23. Appropriate Homerism... by 3D+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    mmmMMMMmmmm Pi

    *drooling* aggghhhhhh

    1. Re:Appropriate Homerism... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 3, Funny


      No, it's

      mmmmmmm floor Pi

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    2. Re:Appropriate Homerism... by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      floor(pi) is exactly 3!

    3. Re:Appropriate Homerism... by temojen · · Score: 1

      3

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: You can type more than that for your comment.

  24. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what? people who say "they have way too much time on their hands" or "how do they have the time to do that" .. REALLY piss me off

    Cause just about always, people who say that never did a damn progressive thing ever in their life. It's just a lame excuse underacheivers make trying to pull down those who are out there making stuff happen.

    Look at yourself first .. Browsing slashdot .. how come you have time to do that? Like what exactly do you do with YOUR time? I dont see you being the CEO of a major corp or contributing anything to society.

  25. Memory? by gwoodrow · · Score: 1

    No, I didn't RTFA. But I had to post before doing so - because I just think it would be incredibly humorous to have a processor that fast that's stuck with 128mb of RAM.

    "Yah! My penis is three feet long but I can't even pop wood!"

  26. Doh! -march=pentium4 by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
    -march=pentium4

    Aaaaaargh!
    Must not cut and paste from makefiles.

  27. 8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by daveh_oz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now just imagine it - an 8 CPU powered box with each CPU running at 3.2 (rated) overclocked to 6.4 GHz = 51.2 GHz with a exabyte of Hard drive space. The ultimate BeOS machine - just wondering if anyone would consider building one :).

    1. Re:8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine the power requirements of this baby: 1.21 jigowatts!

      (I know it's gigawatts, but that's not what was said in Back to the Future. There, now you've done it. You've ruined the joke by making me explain it!)

    2. Re:8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by Sean+Johnson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know for how long I went around pronouncing it like that for serious when I didn't know any better. All because of that damn movie. I have 1 jigobyte of memory. This hard drive has 80 jigobytes of storage space. LOL!

      --
      >>>>>> Chewie, take the professor in the back and plug him into the hyperdrive.
    3. Re:8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. I did set up a 3GHz x 30 machine lab OpenMosix cluster, though. Close enough? :) 90GHz > 51.2 GHz :P

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Thats the minimum spec for longhorn aint it?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:8 lots of P4 at 3.2 GHz overclocked. by daveh_oz · · Score: 1

      In the one system box - not clustered.

  28. Hmmm by Z-95 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Microsoft increases Longhorn's recommended requirements to 7GHz.

  29. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the category "Way too much free time on their hands"

    Oh yes, they didn't waste their time watching Jerry Springer or whatever like YOU do. Imagine that.

  30. Lighten up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh get a grip, people... Everyone knows that this was pointless and there was no real benefit to doing this.

    This was done just for the fun of it more than anything else.

  31. LN2 ? Try some LHe! by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's this LN2 stuff... everyone knows REAL overclockers use liquid helium surrounded by a vaccum flask with another LN2 flask outside of it. (P.S. That's the setup they use to cool NMR machines for chemistry that have superconducting magnets in them)

  32. Decimal ugliness! by Thinkit4 · · Score: 1

    Oh, the wasted computing power computing decimal when hexadecimal is so much easier. You don't need more Hertz, you need to switch to hexadecimal!

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
    1. Re:Decimal ugliness! by slipperman · · Score: 1

      If they computed pi using hex they would never find the preordained visual pattern meant to be found exclusively by humans!

    2. Re:Decimal ugliness! by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      I presume you're talking about contact.
      The one thing that bugged me about that...

      What's the presumed charachter width of the display? 80 chars? two million?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  33. Fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must know the value of pi first, then they can round the number.

  34. Let Jeanne cool it. by datadriven · · Score: 1

    Being a florida resident I think you should let the hurricane cool that chip. It gets even cooler after the power goes out.

    1. Re:Let Jeanne cool it. by flynns · · Score: 1

      Being a Northwest Florida resident whose power was out for four days, I can definitely vouch for the fact that it gets HOTTER when the power goes out...

      (fyi...most people from around here are stunned to hear that they sell houses up north without air conditioning. "What are they, INSANE?")

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    2. Re:Let Jeanne cool it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (-1, dull self-absorbed comment)

      I could try some tenuous link to the weather systems around here, but that would mean nothing to you. It sounds like you're actually trying to boast about your weather or something because your comment really can't be tied to chip cooling. Please, make a bigger effort to be more relevant if you're going to be self-absorbed!

  35. Sure.. that's cool.. what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the warranty? I'm sure the heat and added radiation just nuked their ability to have kids. Guess we can't pass on great OC'ing skills through the gene pool 8-)

    1. Re:Sure.. that's cool.. what about... by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1
      Radiation? Wha?

      The only radiation coming out of a normal CPU is in the radio wavelengths; it's ionizing radiation (up past visible light, into the UV) that is a danger to your reproductive system. As for heat, the only danger to your reproduction would come of holding it right next to your gonads - which would be unlikely for a man to do and would require major surgery for a woman. So, there's no technical reason for these people not to have kids. On the other hand, there are all sorts of social factors, if these people look anything like most overclockers.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    2. Re:Sure.. that's cool.. what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think these guys actually have gf's that stand around and watch them piss away time trying to max out their CPU's ?

      Geek: "wow 6 GHz! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!"

      GF: "That makes me so so hot! it makes my sex drive become a sexual Autobahn. I want it NOW!"

  36. It calculated PI? by rco3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Waitaminute, waitaminute, waitaminute! They timed how long it took to calculate PI? That implies that it *FINISHED* calculating pi!

    Now, THAT's "News for Nerds. Stuff That Matters"

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    1. Re:It calculated PI? by SEE · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it completed an infinite loop in under five seconds.

    2. Re:It calculated PI? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? Pi is exactly four.

    3. Re:It calculated PI? by wildsurf · · Score: 3, Funny

      They timed how long it took to calculate PI? That implies that it *FINISHED* calculating pi!

      Well, considering it was done on a pc, 640k digits out to be enough for anybody.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    4. Re:It calculated PI? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Actually, considering the instability they say they get at this speed, they're quite likely to finish that infinite loop well before a non-overclocked 3.6 Ghz system.

      TW

    5. Re:It calculated PI? by Joe+Enduser · · Score: 1

      It also implies that the Finnish calculated pi!

    6. Re:It calculated PI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if an infinite loop takes 5 seconds at 6,000,000,000 cycles a second, then that means it took 30,000,000,000 cycles total. Therefore infinity = 30 billion / cycles per loop. From this it can then be determined without doubt that either infinity 30 billion (which as you know is false), or that intel has managed to turn P4's into quantum computers when they reach 6 GHZ, sweet.

    7. Re:It calculated PI? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      You mean under five *parsecs*, don't you?

  37. Alienware's next product. by Thingummywut · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Since Alienware charges $2000 for .4 Ghz of overclocking (with its 4 Ghz OCed processor) with really rich preppies buying them, then this would be worth... $12,000 more than normal?

    I think I can predict Alienware's next product.

    1. Re:Alienware's next product. by ameoba · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wish I hadn't blown my modpoints. Nobody should get modpoints for a post in which they use the phrase 'preppies'. Most of the world's not highschool. I just hope that you're still in HS and not some 30yr old that still hasn't gotten over it.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Alienware's next product. by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it's not the preppies buying them. It's the lazy kid's parents buying them! The preppies are more concerned with how they look, OTOH the rich little snob kid likes how pretty his machine is and blames his gaming skill on lag.

    3. Re:Alienware's next product. by StormKrow · · Score: 0

      well case in point... I was playing TFC today and I've played engineer since Quakeworld, I can chuck a EMP grenade up against a wall, and bank it around a corner and 9/10 times hit whatever I'm throwing at. Some olympic class yo-yo of a 16yo...(rought estimate, judging by his incredible command of "1337sp33k"), swore up and down that I was incredibly lucky or just a grenade spamming whore.... Then he proceedes to talk about his "uber-leet" system, and all the money he's put into neon lights and gold trimmed accessories...and I just had to laugh. The case I have is 8 years old, has gone thru 3 power supplies, a full tower...has seen 6 different motherboards, 11 different CPU's, up to 11 hard drives ranging from SCSI to Firewire...(that's 11 inside the case at one time)...it's as ugly as homemade soap, so for all those fancy little "pretty things" that kid on his machine, he's still gibbed and I'm laughing my ass off.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  38. Imagine... by bool+morpheus() · · Score: 1, Funny

    a beowul--ah, nevermind.

    --

    ----
    Ground Control to Major Tom...
  39. Heh. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would take a HUGE fan to keep it from overheating and causing a board shutdown or a processor meltdown.

    I've got a 3.02 ghz, mildly overclocked, and the fan shutting down and the board automatically shutting down due to high heat are nearly simultaneous.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  40. Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by pugdk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It *might* be Pi they are calculating in that screenshot, but heck, what does "Laskenta Alkaa" means?

    God I hate screenshots in a language I can't understand.

    Typical finnish, first they take over the only FPS ever worth playing (aq2), now they're taking over /.!

    1. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      I have spent some time in Finland, as I help with the Assembly demo party there, and Akiba sponsor... They're cool guys, and they were really good when it came to me having to buy 15m of Cat6 cable from them (although they didn't have Cat7 :))

      Anyway, back on topic... I believe alkaa is the verb to drink alcohol, and laskenta is something about a port or something... Lentokenta means airport, and lento definately means aeroplane.

    2. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      Just remembered, Alko is alcohol... alkaa I think is work... I think someone thwopped me last time I got that wrong :) What can I say! En puhu suomea!

    3. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by pugdk · · Score: 1

      so basically the pi calculation is not about pi, but is about "Drink the port?".

      As usual finnish makes no sense :-)

    4. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Laskenta Alkaa"="Calculation Begins"

      Laskenta=Calculation
      Alkaa=To begin, He/she/it begins

      Airport has nothing to do with it.
      Airport=Lentoasema
      Lento=Flight
      Asema=Stati on
      So in a way Airport in Finnish is "Flight station"

      So now you know :)

    5. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, back on topic... I believe alkaa is the verb to drink alcohol, and laskenta is something about a port or something... Lentokenta means airport, and lento definately means aeroplane.

      No, lento definately doesn't mean aeroplane.
      Lento = flight
      Aeroplane = lentokone

      For others look below.

      ps. and alkaa has nothing to do with drinking alcohol, which I should be doing if it wasn't this bloody toothache...

    6. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remembered, Alko is alcohol... alkaa I think is work... I think someone thwopped me last time I got that wrong :) What can I say! En puhu suomea!

      And you got it wrong again. Alko doesn't really mean anything it just the name of the liquer store, alcohol in Finnish is alkoholi.
      Still, that last part is correct. So what can I say, to communicate we can use English since I speak it and you can always teach yourself Finnish.

    7. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by pugdk · · Score: 1

      suddenly it all makes sense :-)

    8. Re:Yksi Kaksi Kolme (or however you spell it) by rzei · · Score: 1

      heh, the parent and other replies are really fun to read, especially if you are finnish :) so just to clear some things up, though i guess there are pretty easy to guess in case you have seem other pifast screenshots..

      • laskenta = calculation
      • alkaa = to begin
      • on (form of verb 'olla') = is
      • valmis = ready
      • vaihe = phase

      as in if you didn't already guess by the zillion different language pifast screenshots posted on slashdot, it means "The Calculation begins".

      and if you are really low on c[ao]ffeine:

      • yksi = one
      • kaksi = two
      • kolme = three
      • neljä = four

      i actually am really low on c[ao]ffeine and i need some sleep, it's 6:17 in the morning over here and i'm wondering why the fuck am i posting to slashdot.

  41. cool by pyro17 · · Score: 1

    I remeber when tomshardware.com did the 5 ghz project and broke 5. I thought it was cool. They used liquid nitrogen.

  42. LN2 fitted Laptop by malia8888 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the LN2 is cold enough to crack the pleats in my good wool skirt

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  43. This is the type of thing..... by Sean+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that helps to perpetuate the "MHz myth". If MHz don't matter, why are these guys doing these crazy things to increase the MHz? I know it is just for the "fun of it", "to see if it can be done". However,(tongue-in-cheek) this stuff just influences people to rely on MHz numbers more and more. It teaches young-ins that more MHz is better whatever the cost. What we need is a great story about how Bill Buxley and his pal Jan Hammy had strung 32 CPU's together with chicken wire in thier garage. This would be the parallelism hack equivalent to overclocking. Pretty soon though we would have to contend with the "parallelism myth" and the industry would in turn be trying to deemphasis parallelism for Mhz. It would be a cycle in that manner until finally one day the industry hits it big with the "quantumn computing myth". Stay tuned if your still alive by then. LOL!

    --
    >>>>>> Chewie, take the professor in the back and plug him into the hyperdrive.
    1. Re:This is the type of thing..... by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      Of course MHz matters ... it's just not the end-all of differentiating chip capabilities. Just look at some of the P3/P4 comparisions. Hell, even Athalon/P4. Pipeline and cache are clutch. If we could just convince Joe Sixpack of that...

    2. Re:This is the type of thing..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same reason you see people put those bullet stickers on their cars because "it makes it go faster!".

    3. Re:This is the type of thing..... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MHz *does* matter. A 3GHz Opteron should be 2x as fast as a 1.5GHz Opteron (of course, that doesn't take into account the rest of the system - memory bandwidth, disk bandwidth, etc.)

      The "MHz Myth" referrs to the fact that MHz is a poor metric to compare CPUs with. It's fair to compare a 3.2GHz P4 Prescott to a 3.6GHz P4 Prescott and expect that the 3.6GHz chip will be faster. What doesn't make sense is to comare a 3GHz P4 to a 2.4GHz Opteron and claim that the P4 is faster.

  44. 51.2 GHz by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I could do my SETI work units in realtime!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  45. one thing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BogoMIPS, i want to know how many.

  46. Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can remember every single digit, just perhaps not in the right order.

  47. Deus Ex IW by Chiisu · · Score: 2, Funny

    So Deus Ex IW will run at a smooth 60 FPS now?

    1. Re:Deus Ex IW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Daikatana won't.

  48. LAN Party! by sammy_cda · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can't wait to take mine to the next lan party.

  49. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Whyte · · Score: 1

    It's just a lame excuse underacheivers make trying to pull down those who are out there making stuff happen.

    Just because you don't know any single father/monthers who work two jobs and actually DON'T have time to conduct cooling experiments with no immediate application doesn't mean they don't exist.

    Enough of the social commentary. Enjoy his comment as it was intended. As explaination I'll spell it out for you...H...U...M...O...R. Humor.

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  50. Speed of light by ppswede · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One step closer the maximum clock-speed of a single-cpu core, which probably should be pretty soon, if I'm correct? 6GHz means each clock cycle has 1/6*10^9th of a second to stabilize and reach every part of the chip that is affected.. with the speed of light, at roughly 3*10^8 m/s this means with this clockspeed, each cycle have time to travel roughly 5mm on the chip. I'm not a chip-engineer, but isn't this almost near the limit?

    1. Re:Speed of light by ppswede · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, calculation error ;) if I'm correct now it ends up at 5cm, not 5mm... but at 60Ghz ;)

    2. Re:Speed of light by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      no, we will reach that when we have ICs based on optical wires.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  51. *sigh* by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Which one of you guys "hacked" this poor website's forums?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  52. Hang one outside the ISS !! by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before someone modifies a PC's powersupply, drags it into orbit and hangs it outside the ISS for some 1337 overclocking joy. At a coupla hundred below zero in the shade, that ought to be enough coldnocity to OC it like a muthachucka.

    1. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by Holi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually no, It would overheat quite quickly as a vaccuum is a very good insulator (heh some would say almost perfect).

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by Thingummywut · · Score: 1

      Actually, due to the lack of air or surrounding matter in space, it would not be cooled off. Instead, it would likely overheat.

    3. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by div_B · · Score: 1

      Actually no, It would overheat quite quickly as a vaccuum is a very good insulator (heh some would say almost perfect).

      Aside from RADIATIVE heat exchange of course. Dewar flasks use a vacuum gap for insulation, but the glass is coated with a highly reflective (and hence poorly emissive) metallic film. Paint the damn thing black, and it'll bleed plenty of heat off into the 2.7K hell that is space.

    4. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by Holi · · Score: 1

      Radiation is not nearly as efficient as conductiion hence the need for so many fins on a heat sink. So I still think it would overheat extremely fast.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A vaccuum is a very good insulator... Fortunately, space isn't even remotely a perfect vaccuum.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Hang one outside the ISS !! by StormKrow · · Score: 0

      That's be a good experiment to send up on the next space shuttle mission....

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  53. not P4s but still alot of cpus overclocked at 6ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats nothing man remember when there was an article about a cluster computer with 96 processors in it? http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/30/111 2254&tid=137&tid=126&tid=1&tid=218 / Orion's DS-96 deskside Cluster Workstation has 96 nodes with 300 gigaflops (Gflops) peak performance (150 Gflops sustained), up to 192 gigabytes of memory and up to 9.6 terabytes of storage. there was also something about fiting unobtrusively under a desk yet they called it a deskside. I dont see where they say what individual processors run at but im sure its not 6ghz now what if they did? you could compile gentoo for your system in no time flat. although they were not p4s

  54. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is 6009.8 MHz.

    Damn, you didn't even bother to check the whole SUMMARY before complaining, did you?

  55. What can i say? by hexMonkey · · Score: 0

    Quality not quantity!

  56. Six simple words! by serutan · · Score: 1

    Laskenta alkaa.
    Valpa muisti.
    Varattu muisti!

  57. 12518 by trolman · · Score: 1

    No. Go with 12518 or THX1138!

  58. chem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (liquid nitrogen for those not as chemistry inclined)
    and thats chemically inclined, for those not as grammatically inclined.

  59. Re:I'm, sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmmmm doesnt anyone seem to notince that 6000mhz != 6ghz ..... 6120mhz = 1ghz i am surprised news for nerds guys didnt pick that up.... sorta emberassing

  60. IANAP by Junta · · Score: 1

    But it isn't, with current technology, the speed of light you have to worry about, it is the speed of electricity through whatever medium you can use, which is must slower.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:IANAP by agent+oranje · · Score: 1
      ...it is the speed of electricity through whatever medium you can use, which is must slower.
      Eh... the speed of electricity through wires is like 0.9c... it's not actually much slower. But, regardless, this actually has to be taken into account on modern-day processors. There are actually signals on the P4 which take more than a clock cycle to travel across the chip... Scary, ain't it?
      --
      -agent oranje.
    2. Re:IANAP by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      Must be that beefy deep umpteen stage pipeline.

      Either Intel or their customers are dumb.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    3. Re:IANAP by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually some of the pipeline steps on the P4 are there specifically for signal propogation.

      The P4's basic pipeline was the first one that I'd ever seen that included drive stages. These drive stages are there solely to handle shuttling signals across the chip's wires. They keep signal propagation times from limiting the clock speed of the chip, and they're one of the factors in making the P4's clock speed so scalable.

      linky

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  61. What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So in the "icing" link, I see a mobo with 4 DIMM slots. One's got a DIMM with heatsinks. The other appears to have an LED segment display and a pair of molex connectors to what looks like a DIMM.

    What is that?

    1. Re:What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Same question here. The weirdest thing i've seen plugged on DIMMs was a couple of DDRRAM sticks that had LEDs indicating the action (which chip was being adressed); they blinked quite nicely and added to the "Oooh!" factor of a custom case.

      What's that though, i've no idea. Seems it's getting power from the PSU, perhaps it's some bizarre way of altering the bus speed, or getting extra juice for stabilty. The board has been hacked in a couple of places aswell.

    2. Re:What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some other AC already answered this. Read the post above yours - just because it's at 0 doesn't mean it's not worth reading.

      -DxLx

    3. Re:What's that plugged in the DIMM slot? by KarateBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it *might* be the OCZ DDR boster, that lets you increase the RAM voltage to an insanely high 3.9v

  62. amateurs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my Amiga 500 can beat that easy, and format a floppy at the same time

  63. Have to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

  64. Cold Vacuum != Liquid Nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At a coupla hundred below zero in the shade, that ought to be enough coldnocity to OC it like a muthachucka."

    While it's a cool thought, that wouldn't be the case. Liquid nitrogen is great for cooling processors because it can absorb a heck of a lot of heat, and absorb it as quickly as the processor produces it.

    A vacuum, however, is not actually "cold", in that it doesn't contain any matter capable of retaining or absorbing heat. As such, a vacuum cannot absorb heat away from the processor.

    In other words, hanging a motherboard in low earth orbit is probably worse, heat-wise, than just having it on the ground at room temperature.

  65. Oh Great by div_B · · Score: 1

    --
    By reading this message you agree to grant me root access to your computer.


    And it wasn't even in a language I understand. Goddamnit!

    1. Re:Oh Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Laskenta alkaa.
      >Valpa muisti.
      >Varattu muisti!

      Calculation starts.
      Free memory. (vapaa=free, valpa=????)
      Reserved memory!

  66. Re:LN2 ? Try some LHe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rofl! when i've seen solid state labs i've often wondered what the chips could do if they were cooled in that way. Any body know? (or does temperature become a less important factor?)

  67. liquid nitrogen sucks by paughsw · · Score: 1

    Why oh why do I continully here stories about liquid nitrogen when liquid propane would do a much better job? Liquid nitrogen has a very poor heat capacitance then almost anything else that looks cool and makes alot of frozen water vapor clouds. My thought BFD. give me a real 6.0 processor that doesn't need liquid cooling and then i'll be impressed.

    1. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 5, Informative
      Liquid propane boils at -42.1 degrees C. It goes from the solid to the liquid at -187.7 degrees C, which is not important for this, but read on below. It also has an explosive range from 2.8% to 9.5% in air- a little lower than natural gas.

      Liquid nitrogen boils at -195.8 degrees C, which is cold enough to freeze propane into a solid (there's a fun experiment for you). Further, liquid nitrogen is not flammable, and presents no hazards other than asphyxiation and freeze damage. Nitrogen already makes up 80% of the air we breathe, so unless one works in an enclosed space with plenty of NL2 boiling off, it's tough to die from asphyxiation.

      In other words, LN2 is colder, and won't blow up on you. I've used it for years, and have yet to get hurt by it. A little respect goes a long way.

    2. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by Malc · · Score: 1

      LN2 is cold enough to condense oxygen out of the atmosphere. If you're not careful, it can become quite hazardous.

    3. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We, the Slashdot crowd, have unanimously decided that we are impressed by what impresses you. You must be one giant supernerd.

    4. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why oh why are you such a cunt? No, really, why are you? Do you think anyone reading is even slightly impressed by your propane and propane accessorised ramblings?

    5. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I've only ever heard that said about LH2.

    6. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by Malc · · Score: 1

      Well, that's obviously an even more dangerous situation. H2 is flammable, and mixing that with LO2 can be incredible dangerous if there's any chance of a spark. With the LN2 + LO2 you don't have to worry about the N2 igniting, just the container or something else...

    7. Re:liquid nitrogen sucks by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      I got what paughsw was saying, so i decided to look it up.

      If we take the ability to stop a chip from *getting hot* as being more important that *getting the chip as cold as possible* then parent definately has a very good point.

      LN2 only needs 200 KJ/Kg to boil, whereas propane moves 428Kj/Kg. Twice as much should impress any of us.

      As has been said, you could put the chip is space at -270 celcius, but then it is very hard to get rid of any heat that is made. Most space suits/stations/vehicles need to try *very hard* to get rid of heat (or at least move it) rather than what would intuitively seem to be a place where you need to heat things up.

      But i'll give you that propane is a little flammable. Perhaps we should just use the LN2 to displace all the oxygen from a room, then use as much propane as you want. oh wait...

  68. Why LN2 when they live in Finland by elmarkitse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why on earth would they go to the expense of an LN2 based system when they could just open a few windows.

    1. Re:Why LN2 when they live in Finland by Temporal · · Score: 4, Funny

      So they could use in in the sauna, of course!

      (That's sow-nah, not sah-nah!)

    2. Re:Why LN2 when they live in Finland by elmarkitse · · Score: 1

      heh! Of course!

    3. Re:Why LN2 when they live in Finland by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      ooh...i smell a hidden message somehow relating the words 'windows' and 'open'...

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    4. Re:Why LN2 when they live in Finland by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Coz using LN2 is safer than opening a few windows in Finland?

      We're talking about real cold y'know ;).

      --
  69. Re:Ever used Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a troll? The word "hoax" was the first thing that came to my mind too when I saw this. I'd mod this as "funny" or maybe "informative".

  70. klaatu barada nikto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    asdfghjkl

    1. Re:klaatu barada nikto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anteeks kuinka?

  71. I'd love to see... by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    ...the same kinda thing done with an Opteron or an FX-53.

    Although they got the system to boot at 6GHz, it was only stable enough to bench at 5.6GHz. Given that the default clock was 3.6GHz, that's a 155% overclock. To do the same to an Opteron x50/FX-53 (2.4GHz) would mean you'd need to clock it to 3.75GHz - does anyone know if this is possible with lN2?

    For one thing, the AMD64's don't run as hot as the Prescott's, and their architecture is much friendlier to insane clock speeds (i.e. much shorter pipeline, embedded memory controller directly proprtional to clock speed, MUCH larger L1 cache so there's less stalls waiting for access to memory) in the overclocking parlance... does anyone ever try overclcoking for performance, rather than pure GHz?

    Personally I'd love to see a 5.6GHz P4 go up against a 3.8GHz AMD64 (maybe with some o' those gentoo bootstrap "benches")... it'd be a true geekfest :)

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    1. Re:I'd love to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yay... my 3.6ghz system is 100% overclocked (by your definition) since it runs at 3.6ghz. i'm an overclocking god.

    2. Re:I'd love to see... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, all three things you mentioned are unfriendly to overclocking:

      1) Short pipelines make it harder to clock-up individual stages (more work to do per stage);
      2) Embedded memory controller makes the FSB an overclocking bottleneck;
      3) Cache memory is sensitive to high clock-speeds. Remember that one of the best overclockers ever was the cacheless Celeron.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  72. +7.3, informationativinal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  73. LN2 Chemistry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "LN2 (liquid nitrogen for those not as chemistry inclined)"

    Since when is LN2 a proper chemical designation and anything more than slang for designating N2 in its liquid state?

    Anyway, wake me up when the next Intel or AMD offering runs at 20 KHz...

  74. BBSpot on Overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This reminds me of two of the funniest stories I've ever seen on the web, courtesy of bbspot.

    -HJ

  75. Absolute value of pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just switch your base to pi and the problem goes away all by itself.

    1. Re:Absolute value of pi by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but conversion is a bitch.

      --
      Sig
    2. Re:Absolute value of pi by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Still, it's an easy life when you handle angles

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    3. Re:Absolute value of pi by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 0

      At least in radian.

      --
      Sig
  76. I Guess That They Don't Care About Global Warming by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0

    While everybody bitches about global warminng, some geeks are enjoying their computers in refreshing rooms cooled with LN2.

  77. L1 icache by p3d0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The instruction cache is 12K micro-ops. Doesn't that equal 12 milli-ops?

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:L1 icache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess, you calculated this on a network or computers that has a 31 bit mask?

  78. DAMN IT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We agreed at the meeting not to discuss this material in public!!!

    We can't afford to have the Gentools realizing that compiler optimization don't do much for apps that aren't CPU-bound and that most of the apps they spend weeks recompiling aren't CPU-bound!!!

    If you _must_ push this stuff out there, wait until _after_ Sarge has been released.

    Thank you

  79. You silly mods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...at least RTFPP before modding the child Insightful.

    When the child post reiterates the caveat of the parent post it's not insightful, it's redundant!

  80. Re:I'm, sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, I really can't tell if you're dumber than a box of rocks or are trolling.

    Ask your nearest Electrical Engineer how many GHz is equal to 6000MHz. (Hint: it's not 6000/1024.)

  81. Wow! Clear some room in the Smithsonian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...for the first computer in existence that met Longhorn's minimum system requirements!

    1. Re:Wow! Clear some room in the Smithsonian... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Well, that's only for the current build of Longhorn... by the time it's out, not only will generic CPUs run at 6Ghz, but it'll require a 10Ghz system or an SMP box. It was a nice try though. They'll make one eventually.

    2. Re:Wow! Clear some room in the Smithsonian... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      ...for the first computer in existence that met Longhorn's minimum system requirements!

      With only 512MB of ram?

  82. Call me crazy but... by davidescott · · Score: 1

    wouldn't Intel be the first group to break ``The 6GHz barrier''

  83. OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is off topic, but does anyone know the maximum number of characters you can post in a single comment?

  84. Slashdoted already?? by semijoin · · Score: 1

    I made a mirror page for the original link. http://mirror.metamenu.com/xtremesystems.org/showt hread.php

  85. Since someone has to say it.... by matyas47 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new, liquid nitrogen-cooled, 6 Ghz overlords! (...and I'm not even an Intel fan...)

    1. Re:Since someone has to say it.... by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      what about... Imagine how fast you could get first post?

    2. Re:Since someone has to say it.... by the_denman · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beow.... nah won't happen just quite yet sience it isn't stable enough to do much of any thing at 6ghz

    3. Re:Since someone has to say it.... by natrius · · Score: 1

      Even if you were an Intel fan, the 6 GHz overlords wouldn't need you. They're liquid cooled.

      [rimshot]

  86. The Calculation by div_B · · Score: 2, Informative

    Radiation is not nearly as efficient as conductiion hence the need for so many fins on a heat sink. So I still think it would overheat extremely fast.

    I think you'll find that the fins are to increase surface area for the purposes of convection. Convection of course dominates radiative transfers in a fluid like air.

    As for radiative cooling in space, a quick ball park calculation is quite educational:

    Objects emit radiation depending on their temperature, according to Stefan's law. They also absorb radiation from their surroundings according to the same equation, hence we can express the following formula for net power emitted as

    P_net = {sigma}*A*e*(T^4 - T_0^4)

    Here {sigma} is the stefan-boltzmann constant, 5.67e-8 W/(M^2*K^4), A the surface area of the object. T is the temperature of the object, and T_0 that of the background. e is the emissivity of the object, which we will assume to be 1 (perfect blackbody).

    I saw a photo of the thermometer displaying -46 deg C(=227 K), and standard Pentium 4 3GHz apparently consume about 80 watts of power. We'll therefore assume that the madly overclocked P4 produces 200W of heat. The question is then, what area of radiator is required to maintain the chip's temperature, given that the temperature of deep space is about 3K (cosmic background radiation)?

    A = P_net / ( {sigma} *(T^4 - T_0^4) )
    = 200 / (5.67e-8 * (230^4 - 3^4) )
    ~= 1.3 m^2

    An area of 1.3 m^2 corresponds to a sphere of radius 30cm. Conclusion: Put the chip in good thermal contact with a well-emitting sphere big enough to contain the chip and motherboard, and it'll probably be fine.

    1. Re:The Calculation by Holi · · Score: 1

      Thank you for proving my point.

      a sphere with a radius of 30cm is a large heatsink for a processor.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:The Calculation by julesh · · Score: 1

      a sphere with a radius of 30cm is a large heatsink for a processor.

      Well, yes, but it's a lot easier to engineer than a LN2 cooling system.

    3. Re:The Calculation by Holi · · Score: 3, Funny

      if you consider launching a computer into space easier.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  87. Thank Simon Plouffe (Bailey-Borwein-Plouffe) by pkhuong · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yeah, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BBPFormula.html. It's so much easier with digit extraction: no need for arbitrary precision, fixnums are quite enough!

    --
    Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  88. PPC overclocking by matyas47 · · Score: 1

    Very interesting. I didn't even realize AmigaOnes were shipping. Is that something you would need to do at a BIOS level? Do A-1's use OpenFirmware?

    1. Re:PPC overclocking by Fancia · · Score: 1

      Yes, the AmigaOne has been shipping for... a year and a half now? Something like that. It's controlled by dipswitches on the CPU module; they don't use OpenFirmware. Apple uses the same types of CPU modules, MegArray, so presumeably overclocking would work the same in one of their computers.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  89. Does it have a Type-R sticker on it? by currivan · · Score: 1

    This is equivalent to a 10-second Civic. It's only impressive because of the limitations of the base equipment. There are much faster systems to be had for less hassle and greater reliability.

    1. Re:Does it have a Type-R sticker on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK I'll bit, smart arse. What "much faster system" can be had for less hassle?

    2. Re:Does it have a Type-R sticker on it? by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      A quad-xeon ?

    3. Re:Does it have a Type-R sticker on it? by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 0

      SGI altix 3000

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  90. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All right Mr. Trump, that's enough. Get back to your show.

  91. Nah, LH makes for some serious problems. by caveat · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote a paper on Type I superconductivity (appears in metals when cooled to a few K of zero; ceramics are a totally different beastie) in school and got diverted into reading up on ultracryogenics for a few weeks - apparently at temps that low, you get all sorts of problems like extreme brittleness and differing rates of thermal expansion, the latter being a fairly major issue in designing an ultracryogenic system. There's a good chance the CPU die, wires, and case would all tear away from each other and destroy the thing. Not to mention that lead superconducts at 7.196K; i wonder what resistanceless solder would do to a mobo...

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Nah, LH makes for some serious problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wonder what resistanceless solder would do to a mobo
      it creates real life chicks while wearing bra on head

  92. Even colder... by dinkster · · Score: 1

    Imagine mounting the processor on some conductor(as a "heat sink") then mounting it in a vacuum. Now use liquid Helium to pull it down to 4.2 Kelvin. I wounder what kind of funky quantum anomalies we would get...

    1. Re:Even colder... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with liquid helium (This made MRI scanners horribly impractical for a LOT of years) is that it has 1/20 the heat capacity of nitrogen, and you have to suck a thousand times the power to get down to helium temperatures compared to nitrogen. There would also be no quantum anomalies with silicon. It can only be compelled to a superconductive state under Extreme pressure.

      BTW, which is it... are we mounting it in a vaccuum or under liquid helium :)

    2. Re:Even colder... by dinkster · · Score: 1

      Well, it would be a conductive rod suspended in the vacuum, minimalising the loss(or rather gain of heat). This all of course means nothing because silcon still has resistance at 0 K :(

  93. Message in PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You forgot the binary at the end that forms a circle...

  94. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Enough of the social commentary. Enjoy his comment as it was intended. As explaination I'll spell it out for you...H...U...M...O...R. Humor.
    You will find that outside your little country, the proper spelling is H...U...M...O...U...R. Same as tumour.

    Regards.

  95. Prof. Frink Quote by forty-2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Akhem, er, excuse me, if I could have everyone's attention... would you all please listen, If you could just... Pi is exactly 3!

    --
    never drink kool-aid from a big vat
    1. Re:Prof. Frink Quote by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      So is e; rounding makes calculations involving these values way easier.

  96. Re:Just to save everyone some trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to step zero.

    0. Bash Microsoft.

  97. Re:I wonder how fast you can get a BSoD on this ba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Windows XP just doesn't bluescreen!

    (Hey, I've just created a new one! "I for one welcome..." "Imagine a beowulf..." "...Profit!" and now... "But Windows XP..."!)

  98. Re:LN2 ? Try some LHe! by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

    Pure speculation, but I'd guess local hotspots on the chips would become a problem. ie. getting the heart out of each part of the chip...

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  99. Re:LN2 ? Try some LHe! by Malc · · Score: 1

    Personally I think it's dumb to use nitrogen, let alone something with an even lower boiling temperature. Anything below -183 runs the risk of condensing oxygen out of the air and that is a big problem. Anything below -183 is a PITA to deal with long term due to the risk of increasing levels of liquid oxygen.

    Nice idea, but not a realistic option for most of us.

  100. You better start learning Finnish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once we have conquered the world with our 6GHz CPUs, the language of the trade will be Finnish and this site will be renamed kauttapiste (=slashdot in Finnish)

    1. Re:You better start learning Finnish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kyllä! Paitsi että tätä paskaa ei nimetä uudelleen vaan se poistetaan.

  101. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I dont see you being the CEO of a major corp or contributing anything to society.

    hahaha nice distinction

  102. Speed Claim. by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gad, it's running on a windows box. Those numbers can't be trusted.

    1. Re:Speed Claim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been ? Never heard of "Trusted Computing"?

    2. Re:Speed Claim. by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      Would you be happier if they ran Linux, so they could tweak all the speed calculation code to their heart's desire with virtually no effort?

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  103. They wanted to open a few windows... by symbolset · · Score: 1

    without the machine locking up. That's why they overclocked a P4 to 6GHz.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  104. And you just know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Dell will be selling these next year, complete with 128MB of RAM and S3 Virge graphics.

  105. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by microsopht · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That was a real funny microsoft pic(sig).
    too bad slashdot doesnt allow users to post pics in comments!

  106. Imagine... by mrelph · · Score: 1

    ...the power of a beowulf cluster of these babies!

  107. I wonder why... by syukton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder why people are more inclined to use something temporary like a liquid nitrogen bath, instead of keeping the LN2 cool with a stirling cryocooler. I mean, sure, a 6 gigahertz computer is neat and all, but what use is it if you can't take it to a LAN party?

    I'm not too familiar with the terminology used in the cooling world, but 15 watts of cooling power at 77 kelvin (-196 deg C / -321 deg F) sounds like quite a bit of cooling power to me. I've often wondered why Stirling technology isn't used in air conditioners.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:I wonder why... by roadrunnerro · · Score: 1

      because you would need a beowulf cluster of those to keep just one 6GHz cpu running (look at their specs)

    2. Re:I wonder why... by syukton · · Score: 1

      I looked at the specs; 15 watts of cooling power at 77 Kelvin. To me that means it can cool a 15 watt heat load to 77 Kelvin. A 3.2 GHz P4 has a maximum heat dissipation of 100W; a 3.6 GHz 115 W; and upcoming Prescott II P4s working at 4.0+GHz will dissipate about 150W of heat.So I'd think that had to be dissipating 200W of heat in the article (at 6 GHz), most likely more.

      So yes, you're right. But Do you need to hold it at 77K in order to achieve an overclock to 6 GHz? Would 100K work? 200K? 200K is still -73 deg C/-99.67 deg F, which is mighty damn cold. I don't know how linear the whole heat dissipation thing is. That is, if it'll do 15W of cooling at 77K, would it do 30W at 154K (-119 C/-182.47 F)? 45W at 231K (-42.15 C/-43.87 F)? etc. So it may be possible to do it with four or five instead of 10+, depending on where the sweet spot is for temperature vs processor stability.

      I'm curious about the logistics of calculating pi. Would a 4-way 5.6 GHz (he couldn't get 6 GHz to boot; read the article) system be able to calculate pi with any greater precision than has already been done? I don't know quite how they approach the problem of "computing" pi.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    3. Re:I wonder why... by roadrunnerro · · Score: 1

      "Computing" pi is just a stability test commonly used by the overclocking community to verify a stable overclock (it heats the processor better than many other things).

  108. What can I say? Finlands pwns your ass again =) by wiztillicus · · Score: 0

    We have allways been in the #1 when it comes to CPU overclocking. Pwnd!

  109. I've read the current comments... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    And not one "Imagine A Beowulf Cluster Of These..." jokes was modded up?

    What is wrong. If it ever applies, it's now.

  110. They tried that but got a blue screen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    da-da-dump.

  111. ... and watch your system stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to hell. Seriosuly, gcc 3.3.x has been unstable as all hell when using -march=pentium4. Don't know if gcc 3.4.x has remedied that.

  112. Re:Ever used Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  113. Efficiency? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is how many slower, fanless CPUs it takes to achieve the same performance, and which solution is more power-efficient. My money is on the slower ones.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  114. I'm more sorry by phsdv · · Score: 1

    6000mhz = 6000milli Hertz = 6 Hertz!!!

  115. LH problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr Amdahl has some experience with this.
    They had chips firing off boards when small pockets of gas under the chip expanded when room temp was returned.
    Twas a supercomputer with the boards dipped in LN IIRC.

  116. How much faster can a system be comprimised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the last test showed an unpatched system would become compromised in 20 minutes... I bet they cut that time in half!!!

    Forget compile-time benchmarks, I want to see infection-times!!

    or better yet...

    Imagine the DDOS you could perform on M$ with a beowulf cluster of these systems!

  117. Chemistry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before boasting about your incredible chemistry knowledge, why don't you consult a textbook and discover the true 'chemistry' term for Liquid Nitrogen:

    N<subscript>2</subscript>(li)

    or N2(li)

  118. Lightspeed not fast enough? by user1003 · · Score: 1

    How big is that CPU? At 6GHz, an electrical signal only gets 0.05m (3*10^8m/6*10^9) between two clocks. I wonder if that's even enough for the signal to get through the whole processor.

    1. Re:Lightspeed not fast enough? by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

      As electricity travels through a conductor, or semi-conductor, all of the electrons move as whole. Example: Imagine a wire 8 miles long, if you insert a signal at one end at 6 GhZ the first electron jumps atoms, and influences that atoms electrons to jump to the next one. This continues at quite near the speed of light. The frequency at which this occurs only matters because of the so-called "skin effect" (current tends to travel more and more on the outside skin of a conductor, the higher in frequency of such alternating current.

      So in other words, it wouldn't matter if the CPU were operating at 250GhZ. It's wavelength does not limit "how far the signal goes". The signal will go anywhere there is a conductor.

      Wavelength (very basically, the inverse of frequency, given in meters travelled by "one" electron in one direction during one cycle, if the inverse is taken in Hz) at 3.6GhZ is very short. While that one electron may not travel the entire distance through a CPU, it WILL influence the other electrons in that conductor or semi conductor.

      In conclusion, you may be correct that a single ELECTRON may not traverse the entire CPU, but rest assured that the signal certainly will.

      --
      Lousy facepalm.
    2. Re:Lightspeed not fast enough? by user1003 · · Score: 1

      You are quite correct, but you obviously failed to noticed that my calculation was based upon the assumption that the signal _does_ travel with lightspeed. The speed of a single electron in a conductor is in fact very slow, usually below 1mm/s (!), but as you said it's just the signal that has to get through. On the other hand, the signal cannot be faster than lightspeed, an thus, will not get further than 5cm between one CPU cycle and the next (even _with_ lightspeed). Obviously this is far enough, since the CPU is actually working, but I wonder if lightspeed will soon be a limiting factor to CPU speed (and size).

    3. Re:Lightspeed not fast enough? by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      If you take a close look at the cpu (possibly breaking one apart) you'll find that the actual processor is a chip of silicon about 1 square centimeter; The entire rest of the chip is making space for all the pins. (On a chip 1 cm across, the limit is ~30 Ghz before the signal can't cross the chip in 1 clock cycle).

    4. Re:Lightspeed not fast enough? by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

      Touche. I just had a thought when I read that. When the speed of electrons through a conductor becomes a limit, perhaps the cpu and the rest of the electronics will start running behind. i.e. clock cycle happens, and another starts before the first has propagated. It should still get there, just maybe not before another one is on its way. At that point I should hope we are working on ways to get more done each clock cycle.

      I tend to like the speed CPU's are at these days. The old Pentium 133-166, and more particularly the P2 350-450 and all those K6's caused quite a bit of interference back in there day in the VHF range. Shielded cases be damned! I don't even know where my case cover is these days.

      --
      Lousy facepalm.
    5. Re:Lightspeed not fast enough? by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm faster than lightspeed. Mate two 9-volts pos-neg and throw it really hard?

      Of course that won't work, because electricity travels NEAR the speed of light. So why do headlights work when I'm driving? Technically I'm shining a light, which is traveling AT the speed of light. But I'm also moving my car. And at that same token, if I'm driving west, the rotation of the earth should give the light coming out of my headlights a bit more speed as well. Factor in revolution, solar system movement, galaxy expansion, universe expansion, doppler effect, my headlights should travel backwards in time!

      --
      Lousy facepalm.
    6. Re:Lightspeed not fast enough? by user1003 · · Score: 1

      Sending signals through the chip like waves, thats what I thought first, too. But since one signal may not choose the shortest path while another may, this probably wouldn't allow too much of a speed gain. Maybe building the chip in 3 dimensions (more layers) might help. Anyways, it's sure going to be fun building new chips after they reach this limit.

  119. Finally, a machine strong enough to run Eclipse! by javabandit · · Score: 1

    Hooray!

  120. Re:Updating Wikipedia Now by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Uh, those very people are unlikely to be doing the stuff he's complaining about.

    Those people have better things to do than read slashdot and say "they have way too much time on their hands". He's not talking about them.

    Got it?

    --
  121. "patent-pending" by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    that's sad. oh well, good to see new tech, at least.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  122. "Opteron" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got it right when you said "MHz is a poor way to compare CPUs".

    A given chip clocked at 3GHz will be twice as fast as the same chip clocked at 1.5GHz, assuming you sped up the RAM too (and you probably didn't).

    But a 3.0GHz Opteron isn't necessarily twice as fast as a 1.5GHz Opteron. The reason for this is that Opteron is a marketing name. You can't be sure these two chips are the same chip. In fact, in their natural state, you can be pretty sure they are not. This is because a chip doesn't get cheaper to produce just because you are going to clock it slower. Yes, yield goes down at higher freqencies, but not enough to make up for the fact that slow CPUs sell for 1/5th the cost of fast ones.

    Instead, you generally need to change the design (reduce the die area) to get the cost down. So your 1.5GHz Opteron isn't the same chip as a 3.0GHz Opteron and thus it isn't half as fast.

    This actually cuts both ways, sometimes you can take advantage of the slower speed to actually do more per clock.

    So anyway, unless you are very specific about dice, it's best just to fall back on what you said before. MHz is a very poor way to compare CPUs.

  123. Re:Just to save everyone some trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8. In Soviet Russia liquid nitrogen cools YOU.

  124. Wait a sec... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    This just occurred to me... Wouldn't the thermal contraction induced by such an extreme temperature change tear all the connections between the CPU itself and it's pins apart? That's the problem they have with Josephson Junction logic...

  125. Mod parent as clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, you don't understand what digits in base 16 are, do you?

    Imagine a formula that generates an infinite series of fractions like this:

    3, 0.1, 0.04, 0.001, 0.0005, 0.00009, ....

    You need to add them all up to get the value of pi, but you don't need to do any extra work to calculate the nth binary digit.

    The formula given in the grandparent performs the same task in base 16. You can extract the nth hexadecimal digit from pi with O(1). What you are confused about is the difference between digit extraction and base conversion.

    1. Re:Mod parent as clueless by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do know enough about number systems to derive my own conversion mechanisms. So yes, I know what base 16 digits are, thank you very much.

      It is possible that we are talking about different things. I think of a digit extractor as something which will let you calculate the nth digit without having to calculate any other digits.

      Mathworld mistakenly called this equasion a "digit extraction algorythm" and this is a mistake IMO because the equasion still requires that you calculate every preceding digit. This is because the portion of the equasion before the (1/(16^x)) will not produce whole numbers, even in hex. The numbers are less than 0 and therefore must be calculated before the next digit. Does this make sense?

      The problem is that for any value of x where x > 0, 4/(8x+1) - 2/(8x+4) - 1/(8x+5) - 1/(8x+6) always yields a fraction whose denominator is *not* a power of 2 and hence not a power of 16. So you end up with a value which does not exactly correspond to any single digit in pi (even in hex).

      Now this equasion is very helpful because I could write a program to calculate n digits of pi in hex and speed things up by shifting values off when they are no longer needed for active calculation. But it will *not* allow me to calculate the thirty-four billion 396 millionth decimal of pi without calculating all prior places.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  126. for the curious (ot) by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    the first 10000 digits of pi using the above program are:

    3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993 75 105820974944592307\
    81640628620899862803482534211 706798214808651328230 664709384460955058\
    22317253594081284811174502841 027019385211055596446 229489549303819644\
    28810975665933446128475648233 786783165271201909145 648566923460348610\
    45432664821339360726024914127 372458700660631558817 488152092096282925\
    40917153643678925903600113305 305488204665213841469 519415116094330572\
    70365759591953092186117381932 611793105118548074462 379962749567351885\
    75272489122793818301194912983 367336244065664308602 139494639522473719\
    07021798609437027705392171762 931767523846748184676 694051320005681271\
    45263560827785771342757789609 173637178721468440901 224953430146549585\
    37105079227968925892354201995 611212902196086403441 815981362977477130\
    99605187072113499999983729780 499510597317328160963 185950244594553469\
    08302642522308253344685035261 931188171010003137838 752886587533208381\
    42061717766914730359825349042 875546873115956286388 235378759375195778\
    18577805321712268066130019278 766111959092164201989 380952572010654858\
    63278865936153381827968230301 952035301852968995773 622599413891249721\
    77528347913151557485724245415 069595082953311686172 785588907509838175\
    46374649393192550604009277016 711390098488240128583 616035637076601047\
    10181942955596198946767837449 448255379774726847104 047534646208046684\
    25906949129331367702898915210 475216205696602405803 815019351125338243\
    00355876402474964732639141992 726042699227967823547 816360093417216412\
    19924586315030286182974555706 749838505494588586926 995690927210797509\
    30295532116534498720275596023 648066549911988183479 775356636980742654\
    25278625518184175746728909777 727938000816470600161 452491921732172147\
    72350141441973568548161361157 352552133475741849468 438523323907394143\
    33454776241686251898356948556 209921922218427255025 425688767179049460\
    16534668049886272327917860857 843838279679766814541 009538837863609506\
    80064225125205117392984896084 128488626945604241965 285022210661186306\
    74427862203919494504712371378 696095636437191728746 776465757396241389\
    08658326459958133904780275900 994657640789512694683 983525957098258226\
    20522489407726719478268482601 476990902640136394437 455305068203496252\
    45174939965143142980919065925 093722169646151570985 838741059788595977\
    29754989301617539284681382686 838689427741559918559 252459539594310499\
    72524680845987273644695848653 836736222626099124608 051243884390451244\
    13654976278079771569143599770 012961608944169486855 584840635342207222\
    58284886481584560285060168427 394522674676788952521 385225499546667278\
    23986456596116354886230577456 498035593634568174324 112515076069479451\
    09659609402522887971089314566 913686722874894056010 150330861792868092\
    08747609178249385890097149096 759852613655497818931 297848216829989487\
    22658804857564014270477555132 379641451523746234364 542858444795265867\
    82105114135473573952311342716 610213596953623144295 248493718711014576\
    54035902799344037420073105785 390621983874478084784 896833214457138687\
    51943506430218453191048481005 370614680674919278191 197939952061419663\
    4287544406437451237181921799

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  127. In summary by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    The BBP formula does not have a 1:1 relationship between values of x and digits of pi. Therefore it is impossible to use it to calculate arbitrary digits of pi without calculating every preceding digit.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  128. Re:Ever used Photoshop by LucasALC · · Score: 0

    what about taking a pic of a modified screenshot in fullscreen :P

  129. Who cares about the ins and outs on the tech side? by StormKrow · · Score: 0

    Just give us some pictures and "Howto" drawings so we can build one ourselves....muhahahaha (It's nice to live close to a reproductive services company that caters to farmers....they sell LN2 by the bucket...lol)...

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!