Slashdot Mirror


11,000 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs

The Barking Dog writes "On Monday, September 27th DVD Verdict posted a bantha-sized review of the Star Wars Trilogy. Written by ten people and weighing in at over 11,000 words, it's probably the net's most thorough, extensive review of not only the DVDs, but Star Wars's impact on sci-fi and filmmaking in general. And as one of the contributors, I think that's a good thing."

435 comments

  1. 11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condensed) by The_Rippa · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are a sucker for purchasing this for the third time.

  2. Lucas sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Repeated 5,500 times?

    1. Re:Lucas sucks by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, the only got to 10000 words that way. The rest was filled with "Screw Flanders".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Lucas sucks by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      Or ....

      F**king Ewoks

    3. Re:Lucas sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the whole Star Wars thing, I read this as "Written by 10 people weighing in at over 11,000 pounds" ...

      idris

    4. Re:Lucas sucks by taernim · · Score: 1

      Including numerous threats to the UN?

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  3. DVD by tobechar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bought the DVD, and its definately worth it, regardless of other peoples' opinions.

    --
    -
    1. Re:DVD by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I bought the DVD, and its definately worth it, regardless of other peoples' opinions.

      I got it, too, and over the weekend (while recovering from my usual bike rides) watched them. By and large Lucas' changes added nothing to the story for whatever expense it took to include them. Some of the added CGI looks utterly hokey and provides a distraction to the story. In a nutshell, a bad business decision, as fans were going to buy the sets anyway, but when you're George Lucas and have George Lucas' bank account, you can indulge yourself. Maybe on his headbed we'll hear him apologize, but don't count on it.

      I'd be hard pressed to yield 1000 words on the DVD set.

      "Luke..."
      "Luke there ... is ... ano..ther...dir...ect..tors...cut."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:DVD by jobber-d · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is this interesting?! If I posted
      "I bought the DVD, and it's definitely NOT worth it, regardless of other people's opinions."
      would that be modded up too? lunacy

    3. Re:DVD by nkh · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, I bought them today and found the movies quite good (some small sound problems in the beginning but almost nothing). What I loved is that although George Lucas cleaned the movie and added a lot of SFX, it is so kitsch you still see the original SW behind (all the costumes, haircuts...). You can buy it safely, your "child's dreams" have not been destroyed ;)

    4. Re:DVD by Cowboy_Jed · · Score: 1

      It is a good buy for anyone who want to buy the dvd if they never have owned any Star War dvd/vhs. Otherwise, anyone would just waste their money on that unless he/she is a hardcore fan of it.

    5. Re:DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ob: Han shot FIRST , mofos post!

    6. Re:DVD by 1DarkZen · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it would get you modded up!

      --

      "If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer
    7. Re:DVD by Kehvarl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparetly, yes. Maybe it was your use of the word "lunacy". lunacy.

    8. Re:DVD by nearlygod · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let's find out:

      I bought the DVD, and it's definitely NOT worth it, regardless of other people's opinions.

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    9. Re:DVD by computechnica · · Score: 1

      I own both the original VHS set and the special edition widescreen VHS set. So when I managed to get them first thing on Netflix I fired up my burner and stretched my fair-use rights to the limit 8^)

      May the farce be with you

    10. Re:DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, but you just got 'insightful' for that :P

  4. 11,000 Words? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah. Not impressive. Give me 11,000 words written in Gungan, then I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:11,000 Words? by SkippyTPE · · Score: 5, Funny

      Justa so longo as meesa no have to read it...

    2. Re:11,000 Words? by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Sure thing (Since i don't suspect their web server will be revived anytime soon, you can use it on other sites for now)

    3. Re:11,000 words? by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1

      Tre-mendous... /golf clap

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    4. Re:11,000 Words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I thought someone had sat there and counted every word spoken on all the discs....

      Now that I see I am wrong, my faith in Slashdot readers is marginally improved.

    5. Re:11,000 words? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't 11 screenshots be just as helpful?

      Well it would at least be easier to read.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    6. Re:11,000 Words? by redJag · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big Star Wars buff, but this seems like plain, old, apologizing English!

      Status
      This site is currently in the process of being moved to a new server. It will be coming back up in stages.

      Jan 16 - Update: Some problems with getting the files off the old server have slowed us down. :( We now have the entire site in our possession, however. Most of the site should be back up by about 11pm CST (GMT-6) on January 17. We are very sorry for the delay.

    7. Re:11,000 words? by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      Thank you thank you for single-handedly raising the level of humour on slashdot this morning (it IS morning here, OK!)

      Too bad some people don't even seem to get it...

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  5. And as one of the contributors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And as one of the contributors, I think that's a good thing.

    Well you would.

    1. Re:And as one of the contributors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? Did you expect him to say "And as one of the contributors, I thought it was a complete waste of time?" Then again, who knows, maybe he's saving that for his review of Ep3.

  6. Good Thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is a large review of the DVD set of 25-year-old movies a good thing? Is the number of words supposed to impress readers? Does it provide any significant insight not already published about the movies? Is it full of "gee whiz, I sure liked Star Wars!" commentary?
    Reviews are meant to be shorter than the movies themselves.

    1. Re:Good Thing? by christopherfinke · · Score: 4, Funny
      Does it provide any significant insight not already published about the movies?
      Yeah, apparently, Darth Vader is Luke's father. I've got to see this for myself!
    2. Re:Good Thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it Blaise Pascal who said:

      "I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter"

    3. Re:Good Thing? by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it provide any significant insight not already published about the movies?

      The more reviews, the better, I say! Please excuse me, I have to go back to writing my Doom 3 review now.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    4. Re:Good Thing? by JWW · · Score: 1

      11,000 words right now I only get a handful of word and its all about Gateway Timeouts and stuff, it doesn't mention anything about Star Wars ;-)

    5. Re:Good Thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!!! It's not true! It's impossible!

    6. Re:Good Thing? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      Spoiler:

      He also Lea's father too 8^O

    7. Re:Good Thing? by Boson245 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, apparently, Darth Vader is Luke's father. I've got to see this for myself!

      Not anymore! Lucas decided that his movies shouldn't advocate domestic violence. Therefore, Luke and Vader are hereafter former college roommates. Also, Han now runs away and calls the cops instead of firing back.

    8. Re:Good Thing? by Jon-1 · · Score: 1

      I noted, albeit by skimming, that the reviews did not discuss any glaring changed between the originals and the new DVDs. I know everyone around here yaks that Han Solo and Guido shoot each other at the same time versus Han just shooting Guido in the original, but what other significant differences are there?

      So many words, so little substance.

    9. Re:Good Thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I read the first 2,000 words and it didn't even mention the DVDs.

  7. Already Slashdotted Into Oblivion by falloutboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll try again later, but if I see even a paragraph on who shot who at the cantina, I'm going to fall on my lightsaber.

    1. Re:Already Slashdotted Into Oblivion by christopherfinke · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm going to fall on my lightsaber.
      Be careful not to bend your wookie.
    2. Re:Already Slashdotted Into Oblivion by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      I read it earlier today before it hit slashdot. And basically they say they arent going to coment on who shot first. Mostly they focus on the technical aspect of the restoration i.e. sound and video quality as apposed to previous releases..

    3. Re:Already Slashdotted Into Oblivion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a diorama?

    4. Re:Already Slashdotted Into Oblivion by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Wookie bending variants are the only star wars jokes I have ever enjoyed! And its not even really a star wars joke. I'm going to check if 'wookiebendingjokes.com' is available right now and start a collection!

  8. 11,000 words? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


    Wouldn't 11 screenshots be just as helpful?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  9. At least he owned up to it... by benpharr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least the submitter owned up to being one of the authors of the review. Others haven't been as scrupulous. :)

  10. Now that's something the internet has been lacking by JudgeFurious · · Score: 4, Funny

    An 11,000 word group masturbation project based on the "Holy Trilogy".

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  11. Blink! by YodaToo · · Score: 0

    Whew, for a minute there I thought he said 11,000 words!

  12. I saw a shorter/better review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Cookiethievery review covers every released film, including a preview of the next one. Almost required visiting for any hardcore Star Wars fan (will you be standing in line for a week for the next one?)

    1. Re:I saw a shorter/better review... by Tree131 · · Score: 1

      No I wouldn't. I'm boycotting the Starwars episode III as well as whatever crap Lukas decides to release on DVD's. I got the original letter-box VHS version right here w/o the added trash.

    2. Re:I saw a shorter/better review... by noewun · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. I ain't paying $10.25 to be bored off my ass for three hours. I'll wait until it's one HBO so I can switch to Futurama when episode three gets boring.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    3. Re:I saw a shorter/better review... by claygate · · Score: 1

      People, view the link before commenting and realise that you just got taken by a storm trooper.

  13. As one of the contributors, I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    you're a tool.

  14. Meesa say... by Pii · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...there is nothing impressive about Gungan. Read a Jamaican newspaper.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:Meesa say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's incredibly insightful.

      Hey dipshits - Jamaicans newspapers are in English.

  15. its the not the size by 2057 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not the size of the review its how you use it...err..

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
  16. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Not sure if you guys are feeling like me but i am sick of hearing about star wars, the originals were great movies. but good grief... i don't know, too much star wars crap and i just want it to all end. the newest 1 and 2 were dreadful... i won't even go see episode 3, i'll wait till it's on tv, and even then i probably won't pay much attention to it.

  17. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They use phrases like 'original version best was' and 'Jabba would not approve', they make numerous threatening references to the ILM, and at the end they just repeat the words 'screw Lucas' over and over..."

  18. I can do it in a regexp by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 0
    $starwars =~ /episode (I?VI? roolz|I{1,3} sux0r)/;
    1. Re:I can do it in a regexp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So episode IVI roolz, then?

  19. Hope you showed your friends first by potus98 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...and as one of the contributors, I think that's a good thing."

    "Hey I know, I'll submit a story to /. ..." *KABOOOOOOM*

    That server went down faster than a barge gaurd in a sarlac pit.

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    1. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      At least /. doesn't burp loudly when it consumes a site.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My server can do the kessel run in under 2 parsecs. We can outrun any stormdotters, that is
      err..
      I got a baaaad feeling about this...

    3. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know right that it takes something like a thousand years for something like a guard to get all the way down and fully digested by the sarlac.

    4. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Oh, little do you know...

    5. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      My question is: with a digestion period that long, where do the Sarlaac's feces come out? A "hole" on the opposite side of the planet? Has anyone considered the possibility that Sarlaac feces might be considered a delicacy in some cultures?

    6. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sense a strong disturbance on the Internet -- as if a hundred million packets converged on a server...ah screw it, I can't remember that line for the life of me. here's my geek badge back.

    7. Re:Hope you showed your friends first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WORM is the SPICE!

  20. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think you need a bananaphone for that...

  21. Silly article by Cowboy_Jed · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone write the article based on how much words it is contained on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs. What is point of this??

    1. Re:Silly article by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      That's what I first though too: "There are 11,000 words on the DVD? Just the movies? Or extras too?"

  22. Not that impressive... by Bamafan77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "On Monday, September 27th DVD Verdict posted a bantha-sized review of the Star Wars Trilogy. Written by ten people and weighing in at over 11,000 words..."

    That's nothing. I've seen more effort put into discussions concerning the far-reaching ramifications of Greedo shooting first and Han stepping over Jabba's tail alone.

    1. Re:Not that impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, the last time I saw the trilogy was a long, long time ago :) But what is this "Greedo shooting first" scene ? I don't remember it.

    2. Re:Not that impressive... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Just out of morbid curiosity, to any of the discussions you've seen on Greedo or Han shooting first reflect on how that alters (if it does) the scene in Empire where Solo shoots first on entering the room upon Bespin where Darth Vader is waiting for them?

      I guess it's okay to shoot first against Vader because we already know he's a bad guy? (Not that it did any good). Or is Lucas going to change that in the next Extra Special Edition Blu-Ray DVD?

      Er, sorry, I'll go take my meds now...

      --
      -- Alastair
    3. Re:Not that impressive... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny
      But what is this "Greedo shooting first" scene ?

      I agree. What is this Han/Greedo thing? I only remember where Michael shoots first.

      Michael gets frisked by Sollozzo, goes into the bathroom and gets the gun behind the toilet. Then, he walks out of the bathroom, whacks the police captain and Sollozzo. He stands up, drops the gun on the floor and walks quickly to the door, where he is picked up by a car.

      Now, THAT'S a DVD trilogy worth buying.

    4. Re:Not that impressive... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      That's nothing. I've seen more effort put into discussions concerning the far-reaching ramifications of Greedo shooting first and Han stepping over Jabba's tail alone.

      You should look up the heated debates on Death Star vs Enterprise. It goes on for DAYS.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    5. Re:Not that impressive... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      Hell, that one's still going on. It's one of the big Internet Holy Wars!

      Current Internet Holy Wars:

      • Linux vs. Mac vs. Windows.
      • Star Wars vs. Star Trek
      • GameCube vs. X-Box vs. PS2
      • Alignment in D&D
      • D&D vs. GURPS vs. WoD
      • Politics
      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    6. Re:Not that impressive... by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      Michael gets frisked by Sollozzo, goes into the bathroom and gets the gun behind the toilet. Then, he walks out of the bathroom, whacks the police captain and Sollozzo. He stands up, drops the gun on the floor and walks quickly to the door, where he is picked up by a car.

      But in the book, Michael sits down at the table before shooting them, disregarding Clemenza's instructions to shoot as soon as he gets out of the bathroom. So, he sits first, he shoots second ;)

      (what, me bored? ;)

    7. Re:Not that impressive... by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      I've looked carefully at this scene and noticed that the shots come in the split second after Han finishes a line. Why hasn't anyone yet considered the possibility that Han meant to shoot first but was too slow? Or maybe the trigger stuck for a second. I think the real debate is how the hell did Greedo miss Han? They were a whopping 3 feet apart.
      -Mutant "I'd whore out my SW review on /. except that my server would get crushed like a Jawa under a Gundark" Hamster

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    8. Re:Not that impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Now, THAT'S a DVD trilogy worth buying.

      I own that trilogy, but I ignore the third one (I forget how bad it is every couple years and watch it again). So this and the Alien trilogy are both DVD trilogies 2/3 worth buying.

      Fuck George Lucas though - I am not buying his trilogy.

    9. Re:Not that impressive... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      There was a line in an old Sopranos Episode that described Godfather Part Three the best (this is not a quote, it's a slight paraphrase -- if someone has the exact quote, please feel free to correct it): "'Three was good, too, it's just misunderstood.'"

      That was the episode where Christopher was meeting a famous rap star for the first time. In the end, Chris got in the middle of a battle between the rap star and Tony over the ownership rights to some oldies music (short paraphrase of that episode, as well).

    10. Re:Not that impressive... by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why hasn't anyone yet considered the possibility that Han meant to shoot first but was too slow?

      Um, perhaps because in the original, Han does shoot first? (Indeed, Greedo never gets off a shot.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    11. Re:Not that impressive... by Sirch · · Score: 1

      How can you say that?!

      Part 3 is just as good as the other two, with the exception of the appalling acting of a certain Oscar-winning director / Oscar-winning director's daughter. The movie brings it up-to-date and adds an international dimension to it - the conspiracy against the Pope was an interesting storyline, and the massacre of the Dons was iconic, if slightly clichéd. Garcia stands out among the crowd, and Pacino even further out - I have to say that Corleone's daughter being shot on the steps at the end (HOORAY!) was one of THE best scenes on celluloid. Even thinking about Pacino's face, and the silence is making me shiver.

      Honestly, I don't know why people don't like the last one, other than Sofia Coppola and an absence of De Niro. Perhaps people don't like the ending? I'm not too keen on it, but if the movie started out in the place it ended, with maybe a little internal monologue from Pacino, it would have framed the whole thing nicely.

      There. Happy?

      Shamelessly copied and pasted from a previous post on the subject.

    12. Re:Not that impressive... by istewart · · Score: 2

      As long as we're talking about other trilogies that are actually worth buying...

      I only remember the part where Doc Brown's six-shooter jams and the Libyans shoot first.

    13. Re:Not that impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the awful acting by whats-her-name, there is the matter of the ex-wife and son. The son was a pretty bad actor and the role itself was disappointing. The fact that Michael would ever forgive the bitch who murdered his unborn son really pisses me off. Watching him lap up her shit and beg her forgiveness ruined what was actually a pretty decent movie - there were just too many flaws for it to be in the same league with the first two.

    14. Re:Not that impressive... by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      What's that got to do with anything? It's not like his other changes made that much sense. Besides, just because it's not funny doesn't mean it's not a joke.

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    15. Re:Not that impressive... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Besides, just because it's not funny doesn't mean it's not a joke.

      Now that was funny. ;-)

      --
      -- Alastair
  23. a bit long, but at least its harmless by Fluidic+Binary · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I did enjoy star wars throughout my childhood, I can't help but think that some people go a bit overboard. If you enjoy that sort of thing then great, but I personally have no use for a review that is that long.

    It is a review, which as for as I am aware should be concise.

    But I must admit it is nice to see people being enthusiastic about something benign.

    And it did make me smile to read the headline.

    So carry on, I guess.

  24. /.ed with no comments posted by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I sense a great disturbance in the force.. as if thousands of MySQL connections cried out in anguish, then were silenced.

    1. Re:/.ed with no comments posted by The+Barking+Dog · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I even made a plain HTML version of it that didn't do all the SQL queries this morning just in case it got posted. My lack of faith in the Slashdot Effect is disturbing...

    2. Re:/.ed with no comments posted by apankrat · · Score: 1

      PHP you used.
      Not SQL, but still unwise.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    3. Re:/.ed with no comments posted by centron · · Score: 1

      You will pay the price for your lack of vision.

      --

      XeoMage

    4. Re:/.ed with no comments posted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even made a plain HTML version

      I'll wait on the Special Edition HTML version thankyou very much!

  25. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, it's Bantha sized, not banana sized... I thought it said banana at first too.

  26. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by maniac+trek · · Score: 1

    well, since I am too cheap, my friend brought his dvd to my house and we watched it on my laptop. I wouldn't call it a total rip-off because he owns both of the previously released versions and this one is by far the prettiest. Also on this dvd is what i think is an awesome documentary on all three of the movies, "Empire of Dreams." I think I might even buy this box set, which is saying a lot considering the last dvd i got was the two towers.

  27. /.'d already... Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hardware Wars
    Collector's Edition - 1977 (2002) - Michael Wiese Productions

    review by Bill Hunt, editor of The Digital Bits

    Program Rating: B

    Disc Ratings (Video/Audio/Extras): B/A-/C+

    Specs and Features

    13 mins, NR, full frame (1.33:1), single-sided, single-layered, Amaray keep case packaging, audio commentary with director Ernie Fosselius, Producer's Comments featurette (5 mins), Antiques Sideshow "prequel" (5 mins), Foreign Version (11 mins), Director's Cut (10 mins), Creature Feature (6 mins), photo gallery, Hollywood Gift Catalog, DVD credits, Easter egg (?), animated film-themed menus with sound effects and music, program access, languages: English (Dolby Pro Logic compatible LPCM), subtitles: none

    "You'll laugh... you'll cry... you'll kiss three bucks good-bye!"

    Yes, it's true. Hardware Wars - that sprawling space saga of romance, rebellion and household appliances - has finally made its way to DVD. Hardware Wars is the original Star Wars spoof - the fan film that inspired all fan films. And as such, it holds a special place in the hearts of every film geek (or film geek-at-heart). I recall the first time I ever saw the short, at a sci-fi convention in Fargo, ND, way back in 1980 or '81. They were playing it as part of a triple bill with Bambi Meets Godzilla and Closet Cases of the Nerd Kind. And it was the hit of the show. Ham Salad? Augie Ben Doggie? The evil Darph Nader? You had to love it. And we did. And now you can pick it up on your favorite 5" disc.

    Video-wise, the flick looks about as good as you can expect for 25-year-old 16 mm film. Which is to say that it looks as good as it ever has, but it isn't gonna win any awards. The print is grainy, it's dirty, but that's all part of the charm. The audio is actually better than I expected, in Pro Logic compatible LPCM. You get the illusion of surround, with surprising ambience (wind noise, etc...), some panning and dialogue that moves around the front of the soundstage in cheesy but appropriate fashion. It's fun and it works.

    To be honest, you get a surprising amount of extras on this disc, but all of it is the sort of thing that's probably really only funny to the folks who were involved in the making of the film in the first place. There's a tongue-in-cheek audio commentary with director Ernie Fosselius, that's cute for a few minutes but is way too scripted to be funny and too short to contain anything substantial. There's a made-up pirated "foreign" version of the film that would like you to believe it came from Russia. There's a briefly amusing Antiques Sideshow spoof "prequel" wherein an antique expert appraises the only remaining copy of the film. There's a video clip of the producer talking about the film. There's a video segment of the director being interviewed on what looks like a cable access show (from the early 80s judging by the quality). There's also a "director's version" of the film made up of outtakes and unused footage from the original production (the cat swatting at the opening titles is a funny touch). Beyond that, there's a photo gallery, a spoof Hollywood Gift Catalog and what looks like an Easter egg that will "detonate the DVD" (I couldn't figure out how to work it - maybe that's the joke). There's also supposed to be the film's script (according to the packaging) but I couldn't find it.

    I'm frankly surprised, what with all this stuff, that they didn't include the goofy CGI-enhanced Special Edition version of Hardware Wars on this disc. It was done in 1997 to spoof the Star Wars Trilogy: Special Edition. I actually bought the VHS tape a few years ago, but every time I see a VHS tape these days I get the urge to chuck it in the trash. I'm miffed that it isn't on this disc in the very same way I'd be miffed if George Lucas released only the original theatrical version of Star Wars on DVD without the Special Edition version. To be complete, you gotta have both. Yeah, I'm picking nits. But it's an obvious nit. I mean, it's not like there wasn't room on the

    1. Re:/.'d already... Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? Sure
      Relevant? I doubt it.
      Someone please post 11,000 words. The site is already /.'d

    2. Re:/.'d already... Article Text by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 4, Informative

      This isn't text of the linked article.

    3. Re:/.'d already... Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, Captain Obvious stole your userID!

    4. Re:/.'d already... Article Text by blighter · · Score: 3, Funny
      Don't you mean:

      This isn't the text you're looking for.
      Move along, move along...

    5. Re:/.'d already... Article Text by BigGerman · · Score: 3, Funny
      you surely meant:

      "That is not the article you are looking for"

    6. Re:/.'d already... Article Text by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Oh my god... I remember they used to show that on HBO *WAY* back in the day... probably right around '79. How funny! I had no idea you could pick it up these days... though, 20 bucks. OUCH.

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  28. Re:11 Words -- 7 words, Yoda compression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean...

    For third time purchase, sucker you are.

  29. Before somebody mentions it AGAIN... by dobedobedew · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It seems every time the trilogy is mentioned lately, somebody gripes about the "originals" being unavailable.
    So just a reminder, if you look for it you can find a torrent of the "original" trilogy ripped from laserdisc to a DVD format. One DVD per movie. They have menus and everything.
    And yes, I know you can't actually BUY them that way. I'll leave the piracy flamewars to other folks.

    1. Re:Before somebody mentions it AGAIN... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      if you look for it you can find a torrent of the "original" trilogy ripped from laserdisc to a DVD format. One DVD per movie. They have menus and everything.

      Do you have a link to a Return of the Jedi Torrent where the jackass who ripped the LaserDiscs didn't put his name in the letterbox area right as dramatic moments come to pass?

      Fucking Ken Ralston... If I ever find you I promise you an ass-beating.
      --
      Who did what now?
    2. Re:Before somebody mentions it AGAIN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ironic, you got moderated flamebait.

    3. Re:Before somebody mentions it AGAIN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cant you just run the video through a filter removing the video data from the letterbox areas? I haven't used virtualdub in a while but, iirc, this is something it could easily do.

    4. Re:Before somebody mentions it AGAIN... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      Um... Ken Ralston was a visual effects guy for Jedi and New Hope.

      Are you sure you don't have subtitles for the commentary turned on?

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    5. Re:Before somebody mentions it AGAIN... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      Are you sure you don't have subtitles for the commentary turned on?

      Only if the sum total of the subtitling is his name, over and over and over again, and only at moments of heightened dramatic tension.

      Otherwise, its some guys idea of a joke...
      --
      Who did what now?
  30. Am still pissed they took out... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Tim Benzedrine and Hashberry. Bastahds!

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
    1. Re:Am still pissed they took out... by La0tsu · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I think the way they handled the Ballhog more than made up for it. Frito Lives!

  31. "Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by reporter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "Star Wars" (chapter IV) brought science fiction back into vogue. After it debuted on the big screen, it ran continuously in many theaters for more than a year: a huge surprise for Hollywood.

    Then, Gene Roddenberry saw his opportunity to resurrect Star Trek. Despite the fact that he used the same terrible actors and actresses, he convinced Paramount Pictures to fund "Star Trek: The Motion Picture".

    Without "Star Wars", would "Star Trek: TMP" have been possible?

    By the way, "Star Wars" is not really about science fiction. Science fiction is about belief in technology. Yet, when Luke Skywalker approached the rubicon in his ill-fated life, he faced a choice between technology (using a computer to guide 2 missiles into the Death Star's exhaust) and faith (using his belief in the power of good to guide the 2 missiles). He turned off the computer and followed his faith.

    "Star Wars" is a knights' and princess' tale shrowded with buzz words from science fiction. The fundamental story is about the greater battle of good versus evil. In this life, evil seems to win too often, so we are enthralled by a movie that says, "Sometimes. Just sometimes. Good wins."

  32. 11,000 words, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many are dedicated to discusing Jar Jar Binks?

  33. Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by thewiz · · Score: 5, Funny

    20. His chest-mounted life support computer also doubles as an electronic day planner.

    Big deal, I hacked my pacemaker to double as an iPod!

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I hacked my iPod to double as a pacemaker! This is what is sounds like when doves cry...

    2. Re:Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by kippy · · Score: 1

      "Which one of these buttons calls your parents to have them drive you home?"

    3. Re:Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Big deal, I hacked my pacemaker to double as an iPod!

      Not a big drum-n-bass fan I presume?

    4. Re:Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, Mr. Cheney -- I don't think you've ever hacked anything in your life. ...this post sponsored by Pacemaker-wearing Hackers for Truth.

    5. Re:Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      20. His chest-mounted life support computer also doubles as an electronic day planner.
      Big deal, I hacked my pacemaker to double as an iPod!

      Big, big deal. I overclocked my granny by hacking her pace maker. Now it does double-time, and so does she!

    6. Re:Darth Varder isn't such a badass.... by FatTux · · Score: 1
      20. His chest-mounted life support computer also doubles as an electronic day planner

      No, Darth's chestplate doubles as an airplane switch panel!

  34. My review of the SW DVD by john_anderson_ii · · Score: 5, Funny
    VHS Remastered THX Collector's Set....$39
    DVD Remastered THX Collector's Set....$49
    Forcing wife to watch the whole trilogy yet again....priceless.

    --
    Be Safe! Sleep with a Marine. Semper Fi!
    1. Re:My review of the SW DVD by dagnabit · · Score: 1, Funny

      Forcing wife to watch the whole trilogy yet again

      Sure you have a wife... and she's Morgan Fairchild, right? Yeah, that's the ticket... and you can force her to do anything, yeah, right... 'cuz wife's are so easily forced to do anything...

    2. Re:My review of the SW DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Giving half of what you own to wife in subsequent divorce.....$$$$$s worth

      Seeing your wife's face when she realises that most of her divorce settlement consists of countless reissues of Star Wars in (now) obselete and worthless forms.... priceless.

  35. Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm...


    /.'d already...someone got a mirror?

    1. Re:Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      /.'d already...someone got a mirror?

      mirror here

    2. Re:Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      troll =

      p.s. im not running IE so that bug dont work here...

  36. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not again - another damned Star Wars book/commentary/special edition. Sometimes I wish George Lucas would die, but that would mean a crapload of retrospectives and eulogies for him.
    Enough is enough.

  37. What's the point? by solive1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The most significant change is the replacement of the Anakin ghost at the end of Return of the Jedi with Hayden Christensen.

    I haven't bought the DVDs yet, but this is the one thing I read about the changes that really aggravated me. Is it not possible for Anakin to have aged? Obviously a great deal of time has passed since Episode III, and wouldn't it make sense for Anakin to look older? This seems to be George's biggest mistake in his second set of updates, in my opinion. As the article said, at least they didn't replace Alec Guiness.

    1. Re:What's the point? by mrak+and+swepe · · Score: 1

      Obviously a great deal of time has passed since Episode III

      Only thirty-something years, I believe.

      Barely long enough for the outer systems of the Empire to come to terms with living in the Empire before they suddenly have to come to terms with not living in an Empire any more.

    2. Re:What's the point? by rayde · · Score: 1

      i for one really liked that addition. I feel that it ties in the two trilogies together into more of a cohesive story. when watching the complete 6 movie marathon someday, the newest changes will make it just a little bit less obvious that they came out 25 years apart, and instead are just one single story.

    3. Re:What's the point? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      at least they didn't replace Alec Guiness.

      At least not yet....

      That's in the next release...

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    4. Re:What's the point? by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      As the article said, at least they didn't replace Alec Guiness.

      They wouldn't have to. I recall in some behind the scenes look at the making of Episode I that when they were casting for the part of young Obi-Wan, they took pictures of Alec Guinness when he was a young man, cut it in half, and photoshoped the left side of Guinness's face with the right side of the actor's face to see how well it matched. So the idea is that Obi-Wan should have a relatively consistant look through the movies with a reasonable age progression.

  38. Re:11 Words -- 7 words, Yoda compression by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 0
    For third time purchase, sucker you are.

    I hope no one walks by my office. I'm laughing so hard, I have tears in my eyes.

  39. Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by Tim+Ward · · Score: 1

    When will the media get this right??

    There is no way Star Wars is sci-fi. It's space opera (and third rate at that).

    1. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by nkh · · Score: 1

      Yes, Star Wars is not sci-fi and I have three girlfriends next to me begging for sex while I post stupid comments on /.!

    2. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do you consider to be a 1st rate space opera?

    3. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      There is no way Star Wars is sci-fi. It's space opera

      And Janet Jackson had a "wardrobe malfunction"!

    4. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

      When will the media get this right??

      When the media and the general public give a shit. Most people don't care about using the correct prissy geek definitions.
      To the average Joe, trekker = trekkie, hacker = cracker.
      Who cares.

    5. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by valkraider · · Score: 1

      In order to be an Opera it would have to be set to music

      Opera: A theatrical presentation in which a dramatic performance is set to music.

      The closest relation is that Lucas has numbered them all with Episode numbers.

      However, I would be interested in a Space Oprah...

    6. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      Please extricate head from ass. Thank you.

      Seriously, it's not a particularly big deal. It's not like the whole Hacker=cracker problem of the Media's. The difference is harmless. And, if it causes people to watch and read real SF, than all the better.

      By the way, if you really want to nit-pick, it's SF, not Sci-Fi. Thibbith!

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    7. Re:Star Wars is not sci-fi!!! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      In order to be an Opera it would have to be set to music

      Thanks alot. Now, I keep having this vision of Elmer Fudd singing "Kill the Jedi!".

  40. Video Quality by Cowclops · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In light of the massive restoration effort by Lowry Digital, who did an awesome job with Indiana Jones (and other movies) the color quality is messed up beyond belief. To put it simply, theres too much red, and everything on the whole is too saturated. It just doesn't look natural. On the other hand, its quite sharp and clean considering how bad Lowry Digital said the condition was when they got it. It probably wasn't their fault on the color. If I recall correctly, GL wanted it to make it look similiar to the prequels. Since they were shot on HDCam it was probably just naturally saturated. Trying to adjust the film to look the same way however, has just left it looking completely unnatural. Even more interestingly is how when Lucas transffered Phantom Menace to DVD, he went hdcam->film->dvd to make it match the film look of the original trilogy. Now, he's tried to make the original trilogy match up in quality with the prequels by making them look "more digital." Example #346 of GL not being able to make up his mind.

    1. Re:Video Quality by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else notice the artifacts surrounding the tie-fighters in Episode IV where Han and Luke are in the Falcon's gun turrets? There were several ships that had red/orange squares around them as they flew past. I couldn't believe that this editing job made it into the dvd's. Hopefully this was just my TV, or a bad dream. Anyone?

    2. Re:Video Quality by rogueroo · · Score: 1

      Just watched it last night with my family. I noticed them too.

    3. Re:Video Quality by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      FYI, All but one scene (George didn't say which one) of Ep. I was shot on film He didn't go digital until Ep. II.

    4. Re:Video Quality by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      Got a source for this? I seem to recall a LOT of hullabaloo about Episode 1 being shot in a digital format, and then transferred to film for the dvd instead of doing a digital transfer. I could be wrong, but in a quick google search i couldn't find anything that said one way or another.

    5. Re:Video Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, a color fix is enough to justify another release. Think what this "mistake" will add to Lucas's bottom line.

    6. Re:Video Quality by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Yup, they are there. It's ridiculous that they weren't cleaned up, after all the trouble (and money) was spent rehabilitating that awful Jabba scene.

      Anybody else notice the whiney rodent-dude being handed a drink in the Cantina scene, and the fact that as he turns his head, you can see through the eyeholes? That's been there since the beginning .. I was SHOCKED that Lucas let that pass too.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    7. Re:Video Quality by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      Yup, they are there. It's ridiculous that they weren't cleaned up, after all the trouble (and money) was spent rehabilitating that awful Jabba scene.

      Anybody else notice the whiney rodent-dude being handed a drink in the Cantina scene, and the fact that as he turns his head, you can see through the eyeholes? That's been there since the beginning .. I was SHOCKED that Lucas let that pass too.

      George was too busy thinking up ways of screwing up the story line.

      To me it seems like he edited a few scenes and decided he was done, but for some reason the most detracting effect in the original trilogy (you know before he started screwing it up) was the yellow squares around the tie fighters.

    8. Re:Video Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong.. i dont have a source but all the "hullabaloo" was about episode 2 being shot in digital

    9. Re:Video Quality by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      Too much red? Too saturated?

      All I do is just move those sliders down in WinDVD. Ever consider that it's your TV's settings/DVD player configuration?

    10. Re:Video Quality by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't "Just plain look wrong" on a properly calibrated CRT set. Your solution doesn't excuse their odd choice of "color correction."

    11. Re:Video Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The majority of Phantom Menace was shot in 35mm anamorphic, not HDCAM. Only one scene was in HDCAM. It was the part when Obi-Wan and Anakin are talking about midichlorians while outside at night -- it was done using a HD 60i camera and deinterlaced before transfer to 35mm. If you look close you can see some of the de-interlacing. The rest of the movie was captured using 35mm Panavision. You can see the tell-tale signs of anamorphic photography, and hear the f/x guys talking about dealing with the various Panavision lens characteristics on the commentary tracks.

      Attack of the Clones is so far the only Star Wars movie shot in HDCAM. Part III was also shot on video, although it's not really the HDCAM format, it's some sort of custom format that has fewer subsampling limitations than regular HDCAM.

    12. Re:Video Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is a result of the way the optical effects were done. The blue screen in many cases only covered the immediate area around the model, so other parts of the screen had to be masked off when the mattes were pulled. If the color of the masking and the color of the (filtered out) blue-screen did not match, you could see a faint border between the two areas. Both are supposed to be black, but sometimes it didn't quite end up being the same black.

      These boxes have been there since the very first version of Star Wars, and are even visible on old VHS copies. I'm surprised you never noticed before. A lot of ILM effects shots from the 70s and 80s show this sort of masking artifact. Eventually, they developed techniques for eliminating them, but quite a few movies ended up with them.

  41. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Three?

    1. Fox video stereo edition
    2. "THX" edition
    3. Laserdisc
    4. Special Edition
    5. Special Edition - Letterbox
    6. Special Edition on DVD

    That's just what I'm sure of off the top of my head. I would guess that the Fox video version was also available on Betamax, but I'm not sure.

    -Peter

  42. Re:Is anybody keeping slashdot effect time records by klocwerk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    there was that guy in new zealand running a server on his 128k dsl line who got slashdotted.
    I think that was faster. ;o)

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  43. SW... Dystopian? by sielwolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Star Wars, the future is a mess. From the rough-and-tumble welded and plated spaceships to the brushed concrete buildings full of dingy flickering lights, to dusty deserts and seedy cantinas, the universe envisioned in Star Wars had a gritty, industrial look, a jaded cynicism that had rarely been expressed in cinema before

    Eh? I can't agree with this. Outside of Mos Eisley, the world of the first three Star Wars movies was industrial, yet clean. Just go to the scenes inside the spaceships, the Death Star. The Imperial design was "blocky", but that is far from dystopian. It was more Victorian SF than say 1930's Futurism. Even the rebel base at the end of New Hope was pretty clean.

    And even Mos Eisley wasn't that bad (apart from being a wretched hive of scum and villainy). Dark? Ok... it was a bar. Outside it look about as dystopian as the ape town in Planet of the Apes. And that movie got dark and wierd when they found the remains of NYC (especially in Beneath with its post-apocolyptic underground).

    Bleek futures had existed in Hollywood before, and some were on a more grimey tip than SW: Soylent Green, The Omega Man. Basically anywhere you had a post-fallout society, you had some pessimistic views, a pessimism that Star Wars lacks.

    And that's just film. Dystopia was pretty stock in SF literature. The world of the proles was bad in 1984 or that even that of the Morlocks in Time Machine.

    The true thrust of dystopianism in film is usually agreed to be the merger of SF and Film Noir. This achieved critical mass with Ridley Scotts movies (Blade Runner, Alien both mentioned in this article). And many would point to Godard's 1956 Alphaville as the first movie to explore this connection. It even used a form of Orwell's Newspeak.

    There's probably more geneological ties to those movies than the pretty standard rebel v. evil empire aesthetic in Star Wars. And all of this does nothing to diminish the series' gargantuan impact.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:SW... Dystopian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In Star Wars, the future is a mess."

      Apparently they didn't pay a lot of attention considering the movie occurs a long time ago in a galaxy far away.

    2. Re:SW... Dystopian? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is not dystopian, but you can't deny that the designs were unlike virtually everything before it. Spaceships used to be perfect, smooth hulls with impeccable paint jobs and carefully curving lines. Spaceships in Star Wars are used- streaked paint, uneven surfacing, scorch marks, asymmetry, areas of incredibly dense detail instead of featureless flat surfaces. The props, weapons, and other world elements have similar details- compare a Star Wars blaster to a Star Trek phaser. Blade Runner and Alien may have had as great an effect on movies after them, but even those two were inspired partly by Star Wars (Scott admits as much in the trilogy special features).

  44. So that's 1100 words each, then, is it? by turambar386 · · Score: 1

    Since the site is /.'ed into oblivion, I feel that I can happily weigh in with my opinions on this article without having to be told to RTFA first.

    Fact is, I saw the original when it first came out. I know the impact it has had on film making and science fiction. If I want to read a review of the DVD trilogy, why should I have to read a crap load of words about its "impact" at the same time. I just want to know whether Lucas' tinkering has destroyed the film or not.

  45. OB Simpson's quote: by comrade009 · · Score: 3, Funny

    (sticking head out of car) Nerdddddddddddddddd!!!!!!

  46. screenshots.. ahoy by phyruxus · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  47. 11,000 words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    because more is always better

  48. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Considering I've never purchased any of the previous releases, I'm not sure how much of a sucker that makes me.
    Sure these are the bastardized versions but the DVD transfer is very nice and clean.
    Besides now I don't have to feel bad about my transferred off laserdisc original trilogy version.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  49. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it did! they changed it!

  50. the review... by bani · · Score: 1

    ...is just a pile of bantha pudu

  51. You're right, "review" isn't the right word here by ianscot · · Score: 0, Troll
    The alternative terms that occur to me to describe this ouevre:

    Critical anaylsis

    Regurgitation

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  52. Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought the point of the "ghost" was to show the Jedi at (presumably) the latest point in their life they were "good".

    If that's the case (and maybe it's not), isn't the importance of Anakin Skywalker's redemption somewhat diminished if his apparition doesn't really reflect the fact that he abandoned the Dark Side at the end?

    This is probably a debate for bigger Star Wars nerds than I, but I thought I should at least throw that out to the discussion.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by solive1 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I didn't think of that. Honestly, I'm not sure, because in the original movie, you had never seen Anakin's face before, but Yoda and Obi-Wan looked the same as they always had.

      I'm not a big enough Star Wars nerd either. I know the movies decently, and that's about it. Someone else may know more.

    2. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...I think I once read that the Jedi ghost is supposedly from one's most "pure" stage in life. Considering Anakin, he would probably be most pure in his early life while Obi-won and Yoda were probably most pure just before thier deaths. I could be wrong tho...

      --
      SIGFAULT
    3. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by wx327 · · Score: 1

      In that case, they should have shown pod-racing-anakin.

    4. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking that as well. But then he wasn't a Jedi yet either.

    5. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 0
      When I saw the original ROTJ film in the movie theater, I distinctly remember the ghost of Anakin appearing with Yoda and Obiwan at the end of ROTJ (episode VI).

      When the same scene was shown on television, Anakin was cropped off. I always remembered the missing Anakin ghost.

      The ghost was in the original film, folks. Don't panic.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    6. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The ghost was in the original film, folks. Don't panic.

      Yes. But it was te actor that played Darth Vador. In the DVD it was replaced by the young Anakin.

      Much different.

      (But it is only to make a connection from EpIV to Ep I-III, so young vivwers would also look at the first three movies. Money, money, money.)

    7. Re:Anakin's Redemption Diminished? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I just thought that Lucas wanted the Anakin 'ghost' to look like the actor who plays Anakin in the second two movies. I didn't see it as an attempt to revert Anakin back to his younger self, and in fact it looked to me like they were trying to make Hayden look a bit older in the shot (though still not as old as he should have looked).

      Before the "new Special Edition", the Anakin that showed up was what Lucas thought of how Anakin looked in life, pre-Vader. In this new one, since we've seen a distinctly different looking Anakin, Lucas decided to digitally insert the new, revised one.

      I saw it as a dumb thing for Lucas to do, because it seemed unnecessary to me, but it didn't strike me as any more significant a change than the chaning out of the original Emperor with Ian McDiarmid in Empire.

  53. And bantha means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what?
    (Something from the movies I would guess)

  54. 11,000 words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I half expected to see SUCKERS printed 11,000 times...

  55. The Future? by Thu25245 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In Star Wars, the future is a mess...

    It was a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away. Where do you get this "future?"

    1. Re:The Future? by sielwolf · · Score: 1

      Their words, not mine. The article spends most of the section qualifying SW not being SF but using it as a watermark in SF. Kind of confusing really.

      The part above the quote I used:

      On the subject of science fiction: Star Wars ain't it. In the strictest of senses, this is completely true.

      [snip]

      But like the Force itself, the influence of Star Wars flows in all directions; despite not technically being a science fiction film, the influence Star Wars had on the science fiction genre as a whole is practically incalculable.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    2. Re:The Future? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The time any of the events occur in relation to us are irrelevant in telling the story. It could have "10 minutes ago, in a galaxy far, far away."

      The fact that it is a galaxy far, far, away, and that we have no way to know what has happened there for the past million years, or is happening right now, makes any reference to time in reference to us irrelevant; other than it would suggest that there were civilizations far in advance of our current civilization a long time ago.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:The Future? by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      Noah Cross: The future, Mr. Gitts. The future.

    4. Re:The Future? by gosand · · Score: 1
      It was a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away. Where do you get this "future?"

      Well, if it was in a galaxy far, far away, it would take a long, long time for the events to reach us. Therefore, we won't receive them until our future.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:The Future? by MikeTheYak · · Score: 1
      It seems to be a common problem in high-concept sci-fi. From IMDB:
      • Continuity: Criswell's opening narration begins: "Greetings, my friends. We are all interested in the future, for that is where you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And remember, my friends, future events such as these will affect you in the future." A moment later, though, he is placing the same events in the past, telling how "what happened on that fateful day" must no longer be kept secret.
    6. Re:The Future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The fact that it is a galaxy far, far, away, and that we have no way to know what has happened there for the past million years, or is happening right now, makes any reference to time in reference to us irrelevant; other than it would suggest that there were civilizations far in advance of our current civilization a long time ago.


      But what about the plot twist planned for episode 72 when a sem-peripheral character named Adam gets shoved into an escape pod with another character and blasted into uncharted space never to be seen again -- only to find out in last line of the script that that other character was a woman named Eve?

    7. Re:The Future? by TheMeld · · Score: 1

      I always figured it said that because the whole sequence of movies was meant to be a tale / documentary from the future about how things got to be the way they were. That is, the events of SW are in the future for us, but in the far past from the point of view of the storyteller.

      --
      -Cheetah
    8. Re:The Future? by don.g · · Score: 1

      Plan 9 From Outer Space is not "high-concept" sci-fi. It is, nonetheless, pretty funny. As is Ed Wood.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  56. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly certain that without Star Wars, Star Trek: TMP would have been possible, since it was in development in one form or another at least as long as Star Wars was... Although it may not have been intended to be a movie the whole time, since Roddenberry was originally developing it as a TV series for the soon-to-be-launched (1976) Paramount Network. Heh.

  57. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by potus98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without "Star Wars", would "Star Trek: TMP" have been possible? By the way, "Star Wars" is not really about science fiction...

    Is the parent suggesting that Star Trek is science fiction? Since I am a fan of both, I don't want to invite a flame war, but...

    I agree that Star Wars is "a knights' and princess' tale shrowded with buzz words from science fiction". But I would also go on to say that Star Trek is "an ongoing soap opera shrowded with buzz words from science fiction".

    Both are a lot of fun, but I don't consider either Science Fiction. [Quick! Raise shields and angle the deflector arrays!!!]

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  58. www.moviebums.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.moviebums.com ... is much better.

  59. Re:Mirror by mwagner_00 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You Asshole... I was at work when I clicked on that.

  60. Han fired first. by otis+wildflower · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, I really don't mind Lucas going in and tinkering with SFX, and when he says he puts stuff in he wanted to get in originally but couldn't because of budget and technology, I'm happy to give him the benefit of the doubt. Even if the newer SFX are digitally fakey, even if they're somewhat _silly_, I can get over it.

    What I _CAN'T_ get over is changing lines of dialogue and neutering characters at the editing deck for inscrutable purposes.

    Han fired first. Period. The fact that he did speaks to his character, and changing that changes his character. If Harrison Ford cared, I'm sure he'd be pissed.

    The A&E documentary released to hype up the DVD set goes into how during Empire they kept shooting takes of the Carbonite scene between Han and Leia, how Ford couldn't get a good take with "I love you too" in response to Leia's "I love you". Ford ad-libbed Han's most famous line, and the only reason it survived and made cinema history is because Lucas wasn't directing.

    1. Re:Han fired first. by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Han fired first. Period. The fact that he did speaks to his character, and changing that changes his character.

      In the 2004 edition, Han fires pretty much simultaneously as Greedo. Maybe slightly after, but IMHO so shortly afterwards that it can't have been a reaction to Greedo, but more that both was thinking the same thing, and firing about the same time.

      What I think Lucas tried to do in the Special Edition wasn't to make Solo look like a wimp, but to make Greedo look evil. He is more evil than Han Solo after all. You can say he's as much as a scumbag as you want, but he do belong to the good guys. So I think Lucas considered it logical to make Greedo shoot first in SE, then realized his mistake and tried to fix it up while maintaining Greedo's intents (that it -- to not just sit there waiting to get killed).

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Han fired first. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      But that's not how it looks to anyone with half a brain. Han firing first is simple common sense and self-preservation; waiting for the other guy to take a shot at slagging you before you return fire is just plain stupid.

      Han was supposed to be a smart, cynical smuggler primarily motivated by self-interest (which is in fact a good thing, despite what some 'holier-than-thou' types vomit when poked with a stick). Not some fuckwit with a penchant for playing suicide games.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    3. Re:Han fired first. by ChuckleBug · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, I really don't mind Lucas going in and tinkering with SFX, and when he says he puts stuff in he wanted to get in originally but couldn't because of budget and technology, I'm happy to give him the benefit of the doubt.

      Gosh, that sure is nice of you. I'm certain that George Lucas is grateful that you're willing to tolerate his making certain changes to his own creative work.

      Han fired first. Period.

      What I don't understand is how Lucas could have made such a change without first consulting otis wildflower of Slashdot. Who the hell does he think he is?!?

    4. Re:Han fired first. by dcam · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is how Lucas could have made such a change without first consulting otis wildflower of Slashdot. Who the hell does he think he is?!?

      I dunno, but I'd say that slashdot represents die hard star wars fans pretty well. There is a balance between exercising your creative urges and listening to your fans. If your fans don't like it may just be possible that you are in fact wrong. Maybe Lucas should listen to his fans a bit more.

      Personally I couldn't care less. I think Star Wars is overrated. Mark Hammill is a joke. Of the three originals only The Empire Strikes Back is worth watching more than a couple of times and the prequals should have gone straight to video. Who calls a movie "Attack of the Clones"? All you need to do is add in the word Killer and you have a classic B grade movie title. In fact I think that they should have added Killer in just to warn people in video stores not to rent this movie.

      Star wars is more interesting in the fact that it for some reason causes people to lose a sense of proportion.

      --
      meh
    5. Re:Han fired first. by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Dude, greedo is threatening to kill Han, and then says he'll let Han go if Han pays the money he owes to Jabba instead to Greedo. Not to mention, the first thing Solo sees of this guy is him sticking a pistol in his sides, which he keeps trained on Solo during the entire conversation, above the table!

      What more could you want saying he is evil?

      Han Solo is a smuggler and a scoundrel. He sees that his life is in danger, and the quickest way to an easy out is to just shoot the guy. Not to mention, he knows the area and he knows that he's probably not going to get in trouble for shooting a rogue bounty hunter with an ego problem.

      So, he shoots. Problem solved from his end. That's Han Solo.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    6. Re:Han fired first. by hobo2k · · Score: 1
      I agree that it unlikely that Han's reflexes are that fast. But in this cut they actually move Han's head, dodging the blast! Laughable as it is, the intent of whoever digitally edited that scene is clear.

      Still this whole discussion is about 5 frames of video. Those frames don't make any sense. But everything else is still there: Han secretly pulling out the blaster. Han having no visible reaction other than to calmly apologize for the mess. Han is still the man.

    7. Re:Han fired first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas said in an interview that he regreted having Han shoot first because it made his character seem bad. In the remake he did not intend to have them shoot at the same time. The only reason they end up doing so is because there were only a few seconds to insert his sloppy CGI hack of Greedo missing Han at 3 feet.

  61. He said "cantina" by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    That's it! I'm going to Moe's!

  62. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Slider451 · · Score: 1

    "Star Wars" is a knights' and princess' tale shrowded with buzz words from science fiction.

    Hence the term "Science Fantasy".

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  63. yes... by temojen · · Score: 1

    Now when Lea takes the blaster in the cavern in "A New Hope" it doesn't suddenly change into a 44-Magnum sound effect.

    Before: "zap zap zap... here, take this... bang bang"

    After: "zap zap zap ... here, take this... zap zap"

  64. Save time, don't read, watch the movie! by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the time it takes to read through 11K worth of review, you could have watched the movie.

    I'm pretty sure we all understand the movie. Afterall, it has been around since the days Carrie Fisher looked hot in a bikini.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  65. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Asshole...

    An appropriate exclamation for what you just saw...

  66. DVDs are good - 111 word review by kooshvt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I never purchased or watched the special editions of the movies prior to purchasing the DVDs. I felt that they were an abomination and should be avoided. Unfortunatly I was bored the other night and broke down and bought them (I just got a 51" widescreen tv and really wanted to see them).

    Overall most of the enhancements are ok. There are only 4 things I would have eliminated or not changed.
    1) Han shoots first.
    2) The silly extended dance routine in Jabba's Palace.
    3) Hayden Christensen as a spirit at the end of Jedi. This just doesn't make sense.
    4) The celebration song at the end of Jedi. I missed the old one.

    1. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gave into the dark side you did...

    2. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by radish · · Score: 1

      I too have never owned the films before (and I'm certainly not in the obsessive fan club) but I got the DVDs for my birthday.

      So far I've only watched Empire, but I was impressed. The PQ is superb, particularly when you remember how old this movie is. Other films of similar age look poor by comparison. The new CGI in (for instance) the cloud city looks great. I'm looking forward to watching the others, although I think I share other's sentiments regarding changes to the actual mechanics of scenes (i.e. who shoots first). I just like the visual improvements.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      1 through 3, yes!

      4....yes and no. I like the music better than the Ewok Yub Yub song. The new music has an ethereal quality that I like.

      But the celebration scenes on the other planets are not needed! It doesn't quite fit in that universe...All the places they show probably didn't care (Tatooine being a nominally Hutt controlled planet), couldn't celebrate openly because of violent repression (Naboo being the Emperor's home planet and Coruscant being the capital of the Empire). The only one where people might celebrate would be Cloud City (we don't know how much the Empire took over after Lando told the people to basically bug out). Also, would Naboo and Coruscant be able to get the news of the Emperor's demise because of the Empire's control of the media....

      Lastly, I can't believe I am rationalizing this...sigh....nothing to see here, I'm not the geek your looking for...

    4. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the above, but I liked the old sarlacc better too.

      I also wish they hadn't screwed up Boba Fett's voice. "He's no good to me dead" can never be the same. (I didn't buy them because of the changes so I don't know if he actually did change to Temuera Morrison's voice)

    5. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by w00d · · Score: 1

      Let us hope that he now considers the movies "finished" and won't screw with them again when HD-DVD comes around.

      "I have altered the films. Pray I don't alter them any further." -- Darth Lucas

    6. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by Kogase · · Score: 1

      Uh... but "Tatooine being a nominally Hutt controlled planet" is something that was probably made up by third-party Star Wars authors, and Lucas therefore wouldn't give a shit.

    7. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by kooshvt · · Score: 1

      Yeah I wasn't too sure about the celebration scenes for the other locations either but I figured they, mostly, logically made sense. You explained Cloud City. Naboo may have been the Emperors home world but he did deceive them to gain power so I am sure that they would be glad to be rid of him. Couruscant was probably under some sort of martial law during the Emperors rule so I am sure they would be glad to be rid of him as well. As the command infrastructure of the Empire fell any regional governers would be quickly over run by local rebellions, or skipping town, without any threat from the Emperor, so celebrations wouldn't be too far fetched.

      Tatooine, I agree probably wouldn't care, there wasn't much there but the Hutts, smugglers and such that the Empire didn't seem to care too much about it anyway. They were people who were going to continue to do things the way they always had with or without the Empire.

      I also can not believe I am rationalizing this, but I have never been known to spend my time being too productive.

    8. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      No, in episode I, Obi Wan refers to Tatooine as Hutt controlled.

    9. Re:DVDs are good - 111 word review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rearranged to standard English: "You did gave into the dark side..." WTF is wrong with you, moron?

  67. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please describe, if you can. Grandparent did get a Funny and Informative along with the Troll, and I am curious about what that indicates.

    But then I must err on the side of caution, as I am at work as well. What did that link to?

  68. True by paranode · · Score: 2, Informative
    I thought it was good also. Having only a copy of the VHS fullscreen special edition version, the widescreen DVDs are a big improvement.

    The biggest changes that I noticed:
    • Ep 4 - Jabba was redone and looks a lot better than in the original special edition. Still obviously CG, but at least it's an improvement and not something worse. Also, Han and Greedo shoot at the same time.
    • Ep 5 - The emperor is now the actual emperor when you see Vader talking to him through the big communicator. Before it was a fugly emperor that looked nothing like the Ep. 6 emperor. Also, they added dialogue about Luke being the son of Anakin Skywalker and yada yada.
    • Ep 6 - At the end, it is Hayden instead of the original Vader guy. They did it well, but that one's left up to personal preference as to whether it's Good or Bad.
    So if all you have is the VHS special edition, this is worth picking up. Even if you have the originals, the improved picture and sound is nice.
    1. Re:True by jest3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      have you seen the changes Lucas is making to Attack of the Clones??

      http://www.mtonic.com/sw.html

    2. Re:True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ep 4 - Jabba was redone and looks a lot better than in the original special edition. Still obviously
      > CG, but at least it's an improvement and not something worse.

      No, it looks worse. I could quantify, but I'll keep it short: the lighting on Jabba doesn't match the situational lighting. The shadows caused by the wrinkles on his body are too dark, where nobody else in the rest of the scene looks like that, bringing to your attention that it's a special effect (and therefore it failed).

      > Also, Han and Greedo shoot at the same time.

      Yeah. Cop-out.

      > Ep 5 - The emperor is now the actual emperor when you see Vader talking to him through the big
      > communicator.

      And the Death Star was a big dangerous weapon thingy, right?

      > Ep 6 - At the end, it is Hayden instead of the original Vader guy.

      David Prowse was never unmasked as Vader. Neither was James Earl Jones. So it wasn't ever the "original Vader guy". It was (and still is) Sebastian Shaw unmasked.

      > They did it well, but that one's left up to personal preference as to whether it's Good or Bad.

      Yeah, it was most impressive.

  69. Wait, 11 000 words = 22 000 bytes by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. 11 000 words = 22 000 bytes.
    2. Assuming an average word is 5 bytes, the text is actually 4 400 words.
    3. Repeat.

    The review is actually just one quad word in hexadecimal notation: 10CA550CC5.

    Oh what the heck:

    4. Profit.

    1. Re:Wait, 11 000 words = 22 000 bytes by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      You failed algebra too, eh?

  70. Re:Mirror by ChrisPalow · · Score: 1

    ditto jerk.

  71. Misread the summary by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny
    Maybe I'm just really tired, but did anyone else read "Written by ten people weighing in at over 11,000 pounds" in that summary?

    Comon, it's not like it's that unplausible!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Misread the summary by evilviper · · Score: 1

      No, absolutely nobody misread it like that, and those that moderated you up for such a stupid joke are either drunk, seriously sleep-deprived, or 11 year-olds.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  72. DO NOT CLICK ABOVE LINK by eberry · · Score: 1

    Just look at the URL.

    Why was this modded up?

    --
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
    1. Re:DO NOT CLICK ABOVE LINK by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Why was this modded up?

      Trolls save mod points for such occasions these days, it seems. Last few times I posted warning about a link, it was immediately bombed to -1, for example.

  73. My Impressions of the DVD set by Gonarat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Overall, I was impressed with the DVD set, although at times Lucas is trying too much to link them to the first three movies.

    Good things:

    Most of the changes that were from the 1997 releases were good IMHO, such as making Mos Eisley look bigger and "more alive", making the Cloud City a little less claustrophobic, and making the Death Star and Alderaan explosions a little more impressive. I also liked Jabba's new band in Ep-6, it seemed the kind of excess a crime lord like Jabba would have.

    The changes I didn't care much for includes changing the Han/Greedo shooting scene (again - that should have been left alone), changes in the shooting scene in the Prison Block (Imperial Personnel are no longer obviously shot), the new Anakin Skywalker ghost at the end of EP6 along with all of the firework scenes from various locations (actually, I have mixed feeling on this one -- I know that the Emperor was killed, but would the Empire crumble that quickly? We are talking about hours to a day or so from the destruction of the Death Star II to Vader's funeral pyre.

    There are other changes (both 1997 vintage and new to this set), but they are for the most part do not affect the movie one way or the other, at least in my opinion.

    The 3 movies are still fun to watch, so as far as I'm concerned, the purchase was worth it. It would be nice to be able to get the original movies on DVD, too.

    --
    Beware of Sleestak
    1. Re:My Impressions of the DVD set by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Informative

      (actually, I have mixed feeling on this one -- I know that the Emperor was killed, but would the Empire crumble that quickly? We are talking about hours to a day or so from the destruction of the Death Star II to Vader's funeral pyre.)
      Timothy Zahn's first trilogy of SW novels explains this. The gist is that the Emperor was using his powers in the force to keep the Empire together and when he died the power structure sort of 'snapped out of it'

    2. Re:My Impressions of the DVD set by Ashe+Tyrael · · Score: 1

      The way I interpret the whole Empire crumbling thing was partly referred to in some of the books, and evenmakes a huge amount of sense in terms of the films (insert obligatory lucas disclaimer about the books not being canon)

      A large part of the way the empire operated was opression and fear. Even when they didn't openly be brutal to the populace of a given place, you can bet they had the big brother thing going on, The people may have accetped palpatine and his hordes, but mostly because everyone feaerd him.
      There's also a hint of a suggestion that a lot of the sheer ruthless energy about the empire was Palpatines own sheer will and dark spirit (sort of like an inverse of the Emperor in Warhammer 40000). Like in LOTR, when Sauron dies, the armies of Mordor quail and run away (books guys, not the movie), when palpatines will is removed from the empire as a whole, the sense of purpose behind its troops started to dissipate. All things are possible when you get the force involved.. damn those midichlorians.

      --
      "How fine you look when dressed in rage."
    3. Re:My Impressions of the DVD set by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      Well, my impression from Zahn was that the Emperor was holding together the battle group and not the whole empire (which is why Thrawn recruited that clone jedi master) After the Emperor was distracted by Luke when he was electrocuting him then died things got worse for the Imperials. The Emperor was able to bestow upon his troops a heightened sense of focus and discipline.
      If I remember correctly, Coruscant wasn't taken by the Alliance for several years (7 if I remember correctly) after the destruction of the Death Star II.

    4. Re:My Impressions of the DVD set by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      yeah, you're right, I haven't read them in a few years so I got a little foggy.. thanks.

    5. Re:My Impressions of the DVD set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know that the Emperor was killed, but would the Empire crumble that quickly?

      No, of course not. I choose to interpret these silly events as premature celebration. A few hours later the "local governors" came in with riot-gear and killed them all.
  74. Re:Mirror by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    Do not click link in parent post, link to goatse.cx, you know the drill.

  75. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goatse.cx

    real fucking funny.

  76. Nonsense by SilkBD · · Score: 1, Informative
    I call bullshit. Star Wars and Star Trek are both Science Fiction according to the definition of "Science Fiction".
    science fiction n. : A literary or cinematic genre in which fantasy, typically based on speculative scientific discoveries or developments, environmental changes, space travel, or life on other planets, forms part of the plot or background.
    Science Fiction @ dictionary.com
    --
    00101010
  77. Re:Mirror by applemasker · · Score: 1

    That's no MOON...

    Mod parent DOWN, it's not a link to the article... it's.. bad.

    --
    Bush Lies On the Record.
  78. Re:sigh by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  79. lest we forget by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    the soundtracks...

    Vinyl
    Cassette Tape
    Compact Disk
    Special Edition Compact Disk

    1. Re:lest we forget by operagost · · Score: 0

      You forgot one. My friend found a copy of "The Empire Strikes Back" on 8-track. Unfortunately, he doesn't have a 1978 Pinto to play it in.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:lest we forget by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was REALLY PISSED when the Cantina music was interrupted between track 1 and 2 on our 8-track tape.

      What?

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    3. Re:lest we forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's disc, not disk. Disc describes the shape, disk is a name. Is it important?

      j00 7311 /\/\3
      or
      u tll me

      If I have to explain any further, save me the trouble and just drink a potion of Hemlock.

    4. Re:lest we forget by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      In high school, a friend of mine drove her grandma's old '80 Lincoln Town Car complete with 8-track player. I would buy 8-tracks at used bookstores for a quarter and give them to her.

      -B

    5. Re:lest we forget by The+Bandit · · Score: 1
      But only true lovers of Star Wars, we must also include.....

      45 lp - Star Wars Story Book
      45 lp - Star Wars Empire Strikes Back Story Book
      33 lp - Empire Strikes Back (stripped down movie audio)

      And to think Lucas was smart enough to ask for the merchandising.

      Not that I am a collector or anything, my collection on top of everything listed thus far, I also have ALL "bubble gum" cards for IV V VI movies, every single Kenner toy, board games, posters, holder, display posters, I even have the remote control R2D2 life size Astro Droid. 98% of all toys are unopened. When I was a kid, I bought everything is double (execpt for the storm troopers) Oh, and yes, the comics in mint condition, 1-16 as I recall.

      But none of this stuff has a high enough price to have a picture of the bank employees when they saw what I put in the vault. Truely a Kodak Moment.

      NOTHING IS FOR SALE (yet)

    6. Re:lest we forget by daivzhavue · · Score: 1

      Yes. But it made it easier to find the cantina song on that 8-track.

      Mom really regretted buying that for me right before our annual 3 day drive down to California. :)

      --
      "A REAL computer has ONE speed and the only powersaving it permits is when you pull the power leads out of the back!"
    7. Re:lest we forget by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      You don't have the 33 LP of the Star Wars Christmas Special including such great hits as "What do you get a Wookie for Christmas (when he already has a comb)?"

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  80. My 3 words about SW: No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 3 words about Star Wars: No big deal.

    Now, don't tell me that my opinion that Star Wars is not a big deal in the film history makes me a troll.

    1. Re:My 3 words about SW: No big deal by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      don't tell me that my opinion that Star Wars is not a big deal in the film history makes me a troll

      I wouldn't worry about that happening. All the moderators used their points to rate my posts 'Overrated'. By the time they read your post, they'll be out of points. :)

    2. Re:My 3 words about SW: No big deal by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Now, don't tell me that my opinion that Star Wars is not a big deal in the film history makes me a troll.

      No, just stupid. Any trilogy that is a huge release the second time it's released after 25 years and which are some of the best selling movies of all time, with countless auxillary movies and books and various spinoffs is a big deal in file history. It's not really a matter of opinion.

  81. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Mordaximus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hate to break it to you, but Gene Roddenberry began work on the new Star Trek in 1975 (Two years before Star Wars had any sway)... Originaly for TV, it evolved into a Motion Picture later on. Not to mention the cartoon between 1973 and 1975.

    Star Trek was HUGE in the 70s, moreso than when it was in original runs.

    Methinks that maybe you weren't born when Star Wars or Star Trek made their original theater runs :)

  82. Re:Mirror by jo42 · · Score: 1

    SUCKERS!!!

    - George

  83. 6 words with Smirnoff compression by ajlitt · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, sucker purchases you!

  84. I like this by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a situation where none of us has RTFA.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. re: i like this by ed.han · · Score: 1

      what's really telling: at the time of this writng there are 166 comments but so far, nobody's got a mirror.

      ed

    2. Re:I like this by ihaddsl · · Score: 1

      Situation Normal.

  85. What really pissed me off... by goldspider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...about the '97 release was that horrible sequence with Han and Jabba in EP4. What were they thinking?

    In EP6, Jabba looked huge, and disgusting... like he was supposed to be. For some reason he didn't look either huge or disgusting, or particularly intimidating either.

    And hell, they even had Han repeating lines from the Greedo scene ("Hey, even I get boarded sometimes"). Were they even trying??

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:What really pissed me off... by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That scene really was supposed to be in the original movie, though. They just didn't have the technology at the time to pull it off.

      (The original idea, I think, was to replace the actor standing in for Jabba with a puppet shot on a blue screen.)

      However, after it became apparent that they couldn't do that scene with current technology, they moved all the information learned in that scene to the scene with Greedo.

      So, yes, the scene is totally redundant and looked wrong (because it was originally designed around a different Jabba) as shot. This is why the 1997 version had Han Solo step on Jabbas tail - Harrison Ford walked around the stand-in in the original shot, before they really knew what Jabba would look like.

      Ultimately, it's one of those scenes that it's kinda neat to know that we can do it now, but serves no purpose any more since they basically wrote it out of the original movie. It's something that they could have done as a bonus feature or something, since it doesn't really offer anything new to the story.

      I can't really find any good links on it, but it's mentioned several times if you search for it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:What really pissed me off... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      In EP6, Jabba looked huge, and disgusting... like he was supposed to be. For some reason he didn't look either huge or disgusting, or particularly intimidating either.

      Yup. It's really sad to see someone let themselves go like that. He should have exercised and eaten right.

      How long was it between the scene in Episode IV and the scene in Episode VI? I reckon it's plausible for Jabba to have put on an impressive amount of weight in the right time frame.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    3. Re:What really pissed me off... by wattersa · · Score: 1

      In addition, Jabba obviously knows that Han just killed Greedo (who, incidentally, missed Han from about 2 feet away) but all he does is say "and why did you have to fry poor Greedo?" instead of breaking Solo's legs like a real gangster. I was disappointed.

  86. Slashdotted? Which one of you jokers.... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 0

    Which one of you *brokeded* their server? Speak up!!! You'll get what's due to you!

    Karma man... it's all KARMA!

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  87. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    Science fiction is about belief in technology.

    I've never seen a definition of science fiction as "belief in technology." The science fiction I've read usually shows how technology leads to the destruction of society or the world.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  88. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redundant can be taken to mean that the statement does not need to be said, it can be taken for granted.

    11 words condensed still equals 11

    Is such a blindingly obvious statement, that it really does require a -1 redundant rating.

  89. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOMEBODY please mod that one down and dont any one reading this click on it.. Its disgusting and disturbing.

  90. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roll over the link and you can see that it goes to goatsex. What kind of idiot are you?

  91. Obligatory Obi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool who follows him?

  92. As Shakespeare said once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much Ado about Nothing... And who can argue with him?

  93. 11,000 Words? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    When I first read this headline, I thought it meant there were 11,000 words on the DVD itself (or within the DVD package). Then I read the caption and, well, it made more sense. But I was much more excited when I initially thought that Lucas & Co. had written a ton of stuff for Star Wars fanatics to enjoy... or hate, whatever.

  94. Kessle Run by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    Under twelve parsecs?

    Post sometihng on Slashdot about Star Wars and see how fast it's slashdotted.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  95. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you say something which everybody else is already thinking, or something which everybody else has already heard a thousand times before, you are redundant, even if you were the winner of the race to post your "insight" on slashdot ahead of all the other Karma Whores who were typing the exact same thing.

  96. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sometimes. Just sometimes. Good wins.
    Evil will always triumph over good because good is dumb.

    (Now that is a good movie.)

  97. Re:Uh.. that was Ogre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, from "Revenge of the Nerds."

  98. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by danzona · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't call it a total rip-off because he owns both of the previously released versions and this one is by far the prettiest.

    The ripoff is that your friend was duped into buying the two inferior versions. Why wasn't the good version released first?

  99. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Funny

    One wonders if a Davinci who lived long into old age, might have painted a smile face on top of the Mona Lisa in a fit of senility...

  100. this just in: by hdd · · Score: 5, Funny
    50% Funny
    20% Troll
    20% Overrated

    according to a new poll, only 50% of slashdotters mastubate.

    mod me up for not posting this anonymously!

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  101. Re:Mirror by Elsebet · · Score: 1

    Phew, thank goodness for "Open link in New Tab". I read the replies just one second too late, but was able to close the tab without it ever "rearing" its evil form on my screen.

    --
    Sacré-bleu! Where is me mama?
  102. MOD PARENT UP! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (my first ever MPU! post)

    Absolutely, it was all about the redemption!

    And to erase the redeemed Anakin is to nullify the moment when he saw his son being zapped by the Emperor, deciding "fuck it, it was never supposed to be this way", and taking the Emperor out.

    I didn't buy the DVDs, nor do I plan to, especially since now I wonder whether in "Lucas' Vision" Anakin ever got redeemed, or if Anakin was truly destroyed by Vader.

    Not that it really matters, but it does change the premise of the movie.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only changes the premise of the movie if you believe the premise of the movie relies on assumptions made by fans as to the "meaning" of the Jedi spirit.

      If you just say, "hey yeah there's the ghost of Anakin - that makes no sense" then it makes perfect sense.

  103. So explain this... by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I thought the point of the "ghost" was to show the Jedi at (presumably) the latest point in their life they were "good". If that's the case (and maybe it's not), isn't the importance of Anakin Skywalker's redemption somewhat diminished if his apparition doesn't really reflect the fact that he abandoned the Dark Side at the end?

    So how the hell did Luke recognize him?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:So explain this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Luke helped Vader-turned-back-to-Anakin take off his mask before he died. Sure the ghost had more hair, but Luke would at least recognize the face. It wouldn't be that hard to connect the dots.

    2. Re:So explain this... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how the hell did Luke recognize him?

      Heh, well, which other dead Jedi-relative to Luke would it be?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:So explain this... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're talking about films that are filled with magical people that can levitate things with their minds, fight with their eyes closed, deflect laser blasts with hand-held energy swords, and talk telepathically between space ships, and you don't see how one of these magical people would be able to recognize his own father?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    4. Re:So explain this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Empire, Luke was able to verify Vaders's assertion that he was his father, merely by "searching his feelings" and that was without even seeing Vader's face. If you can search your feelings to verify fatherhood, you can probably search your feelings to recognize your father.

    5. Re:So explain this... by gosand · · Score: 1
      We're talking about films that are filled with magical people that can levitate things with their minds, fight with their eyes closed, deflect laser blasts with hand-held energy swords, and talk telepathically between space ships, and you don't see how one of these magical people would be able to recognize his own father?


      They aren't magical, it is a genetic medical condition, remember? :-)


      You know, now that I think about it, having the ghost be the young Skywalker was the *ONE* missing piece that just didn't make sense. I am sure glad that Lucas went to the effort to tie it all up seamlessly like that. It made no sense before, but now with that change, it all makes sense. And Han/Gredo firing at the same time? I think that is a metaphor for like when you make an electronic bank deposit for a huge royalty check, and at nearly the exact same time you purchase a new helicopter to fly you to "Skywalker Ranch". As long as that deposit gets there just before the withdrawl, you are safe. Ahh, the genius mind of George Lucas.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:So explain this... by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      So how the hell did Luke recognize him?

      Process of elimination??

      During episodes 4-6, there are exactly 5 jedi's in the entire universe: Luke, Obi-Wan, Yoda, Vader, and Palpatine, so they are the only players who could be involved in a ghost thing. Luke obviously wouldn't be a ghost, and Luke can easily recognise the forms of Yoda and Obi-Wan. We can figure that Palpatine is majorly pissed at Luke and doesn't want to appear in any kind of vision to Luke; he's off keying Vader's ghostmobile anyway. So that leaves just one jedi unaccounted for, Vader/Aniken, which is who the third ghost would have to be. The ghost could have looked like a female wookie, but the logical assumption would have to be that it is Aniken.

    7. Re:So explain this... by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      The real question is whether or not the audience recognized him. If a 20-something kid had showed up at the end if the original ROTJ, nobody in the audience would have known who he was.

      StarWarzers are almost as bad as Trekkies .. trying to rationalize things happening in the movie to make it suit your perception of the "universe". It's a freakin movie already, okay?

      (Go ahead .. mod me flamebait ... whatever.)

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    8. Re:So explain this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's easier to believe the impossible than the implausible."

    9. Re:So explain this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wizard did it.

    10. Re:So explain this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm... we recognized him and we'd never seen him like that before either. it's a little thing called assumption.

    11. Re:So explain this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same logic as Minas Tirith being edited out of establishing shots of Osgiliath in The Two Towers, but reinserted for the DVD: people watching the whole lot at their leisure are not going to mistake Minas Tirith for Helm's Deep, and are going to know what Annakin looked like as a twenty something.

    12. Re:So explain this... by gosand · · Score: 1
      StarWarzers are almost as bad as Trekkies .. trying to rationalize things happening in the movie to make it suit your perception of the "universe". It's a freakin movie already, okay?


      Nope. It used to be a movie. Now it is a franchise.


      I hate Star Trek. Never liked it. I am not a Star Wars freak either. My problem is - Lusas changed the movie. We aren't talking about ROTJ anymore, we are talking about a different version of the movie. If Lucas wanted the young Vader in the movie, he could have done it when he shot the damn thing. But he didn't.


      I don't really care - I don't have to buy the damn DVDs, and I won't as long as Lucas fucks around with them to suit his ego (and wallet). The arguments of "artistic vision" don't apply, because he made a bunch of stupid revisions that have nothing to do with art. He's a looney with no vision, who got lucky with Star Wars.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  104. comprehensive list of changes from original movies by sjf · · Score: 2

    Is there such a thing ? Does this review offer it ?

    Appeals to my inner nerd anyhoo.

    -S

  105. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by tuffy · · Score: 1
    Hate to break it to you, but Gene Roddenberry began work on the new Star Trek in 1975 (Two years before Star Wars had any sway)... Originaly for TV, it evolved into a Motion Picture later on. Not to mention the cartoon between 1973 and 1975.

    Despite the big syndication ratings, Star Trek: Phase II never caught on. It wasn't until George Lucas made a mint on Star Wars that Paramount came calling looking to capitalize on their existing sci-fi franchise. So, Roddenberry rolled all the Phase II stuff into TMP and made enough money to rebuild the franchise. But without Star Wars, all we'd have today is the original series running in syndication.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  106. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Without "Star Wars", would "Star Trek: TMP" have been possible?

    These are the questions that haunt us. What sort of nightmarish world would we today inhabit had there never been a "Star Trek: The Motion Picture"? No, no, it's too horrible even to contemplate. Let us instead give daily thanks in our prayers that there was "Star Wars", and for all the blessings it has brought upon us. For we are huge nerds, and so forever shall be. Amen.

  107. I'm sorry but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares?

  108. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by hai.uchida · · Score: 3, Funny

    Without "Star Wars", would "Star Trek: TMP" have been possible? Maybe. But much, much more imnportant: without Star Wars, would the Buck Rogers series starring Gil Gerard have been possible?

    --
    my password is private, but unchanged.
  109. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bald chicks are hottt !!!

  110. Legality by phorm · · Score: 1

    Not that I really care too much, but as a point of interest - if one owns the "better" or "more recent" version of something, is there entitelement to previous versions?

    For example, if I own a CD, I can rip it to Mp3. Supposedly, if I scratched said CD, I could download it anew. Probably not so if I just owned the tape and the mp3 was still ripped from CD.

    Butttt... the laserdisk != the DVD. So I'm not sure that owning the edited DVD entitles one to a copy of the laserdisk, but I could probably download a divX rip of the DVD which I own?

  111. MAJOR issue by TheHawke · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you have a modded Xbox, do NOT put dvd 4 into it or your modifications will NOT work anymore! The DVD forcefeeds updates into the console, causing it to disable any mods of hacks that the console has in it.

    I tried posting the warning to be put on as news, but it appeared that the editors has bigger things to do, like figuring out who to line up for barfights.

    http://www.boingboing.net/2004/09/24/lucas_put_m al icious_.html
    http://www.xbox-scene.com/xbox1data/ sep/EpAVlAVpuZ DrYOIHtX.php
    http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.p hp?showtopic=2 78283&st=195

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  112. Star Wars: Clone Wars Cartoon DVD by planckscale · · Score: 1
    This was an awesome cartoon! It was very well done and I'm wondering if I am the only fan? Does anyone know when this will come out? In the meantime, anyone know a location of a torrent to see any of the chapters?

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:Star Wars: Clone Wars Cartoon DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an expertly made VCD of the entire 20 episodes of the Clone Wars, with chapters and animated menus. Some nice soul made this all by himself and posted it in alt.binaries.multimedia.cartoons a while back...

      Not sure if there's a torrent available. I could try to make one if there was enough interest...

    2. Re:Star Wars: Clone Wars Cartoon DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes please do and post to suprnova.org!

  113. Greedo shot first! by IgLou · · Score: 1

    Darn Rebels still get their version of history! Long live the Empire! Long live the Sith! Darth Maul still lives! There never where any Gungans, it's all lies! Same thing for Ewoks! ... Angelina Jolie is hot! Oh sorry folks, my ranting got out of control.

    --

    Oops, how did this get here?
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  114. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are actually three versions on Laserdisc...

    1. THX edition
    2. Ulitmate Collector's Edition
    3. Special Edition

    I've got two and three.

  115. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by fmita · · Score: 1

    I know there's a VCD version out there

  116. WHO GIVES A FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goddamn it friggen starwars geeks...get a girlfriend, marry her, have some kids etc..

    no your right hand is not a substitute!

    GET A FUCKING LIFE!

  117. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    Lucas has never denied any of this. He very carefully followed the classic story archetypes, working closely with Joseph Campbell, the professor who first pointed out the common themes of mythology. He just decided to set it in space for some reason.

  118. on a totally unrelated note by ronsta · · Score: 1

    a coworker of mine estimated what the janitorial staff of the deathstar would have to be to keep the thing up and running. see below: "The presently-available evidence indicates that the diameter of the first Death Star is in the range 160 - 165km, although the purely canonical evidence cannot strictly rule out a smaller figure close to the commonly published 120km value. The diameter of the Death Star II is in the range 800km - 960km." That gives the first (and much smaller Death Star) a volume of 2.143 million cubic kilometers. Our building might have a total volume of 0.0005 (being generous) of a cubic kilometer. We have a cleaning staff of at least 5 people, and no residential area (which would likely impose a lower demand, since people take care of their own area). So lets say that this gives us a number of 200 required cleaning staff per cubic kilometer of building. This means that the janitorial staff of the death star would have to be close to 450 million janitors to maintain the death star, disregarding the admittedly large volume dedicated to spaces like the central core and giant laser of doom power system.

    1. Re:on a totally unrelated note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone on the first Death Star was in the military.
      Most on the second Death Star were in the military.
      I was in the military.
      I used to clean for HALF MY WORKDAY.
      Everyone on the first Death Star was cleaning for half the day.
      Most on the second Death Star was cleaning for half the day.

      Janitorial issue SOLVED.

  119. Too many digital artifacts by WarpedMind · · Score: 1

    I would have loved to have the original theatrical releases rather than GL's re-hashes. (Or at least like the release of Brazil with all three versions.)

    What really bothered me was the horrible digital artifacts. In a couple of the dog fight scenes you can see the mat background of the superimposed photos of the fighters. It shows up as a slightly less black square surrounding the ships against a darker deep space. Plus the stars are blocked out.

    I saw this a lot in the Star Trek series when it was digitized. Mostly anytime a shuttle left the bay.

    Also there were some wierd red shadows in some of the more spectacular explosions.

    1. Re:Too many digital artifacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I saw this immediately and was VERY disturbed by it? I think I could have repaired that in photoshop. Could not have been more than a couple hundred frames (AT MOST!)...sad.

  120. Hope you play... by Farrside · · Score: 1

    ... Music with a back-beat!

  121. I watched them last weekend ... by ninjagin · · Score: 1
    ... thanx to NetFlix, and I have my own opinions on a few of the points they're probably raising in their tome:

    IV - The Jabba/Solo meeting at MosEisley pad 94 - the film stock for Solo's appearance wasn't that great, or at least he seems a bit too grainy. He also looks kind of two-dimensional. Jabba is walking, er, sliming around and he moves with such ease that I find it unbelieveable, even when I suspend disbelief for the duration of the film. Jabba would send someone to do the pressing of Solo anyway, so it's twice unbelieveable. The scene doesn't add anything to the story, so I figure it was just an attempt to have CG allow old filmstock to be used. IV - All the CG creature shots - great addition. Adds to the eye candy.

    V - Didn't really notice anything apart from the addition of the Hoth ice creature in full view. He used to be played by a severed arm, but he looks much more fearsome in the flesh, and it makes the first twenty minutes of the film a little more zingy.

    VI - I have two gripes here: 1) The addition of the CG-generated performers in Jabba's palace was a waste. Yeah, the old puppetish singer with the really-long trunk looked a little cheesy, but I thought the CG and the addition of the punky backup singers was even worse. 2) The changing of Anakin's apparition to match the visage of the pre-dark-side anakin in III, just bugged me. I liked the continuity of an Anakin apparition that resembled the unhelmeted Vader. After all, the Obi-wan apparition doesn't look like Ewan, it looks like Alec. It was a dumb move.

    Okay, so there are my beefs. Nope, it's not 11,000 words, but at least it's here to read.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    1. Re:I watched them last weekend ... by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      I agreed for the most part.... The things that really bothered me about VI were: In Jabba's palace wasnt the new CGI during the "song".... but I actually thought the old jingle was much better, to me it seemed he tried to backstreet boy it up in the new version. Same goes for the ending, I didnt enjoy the new music there, but also didnt care much for the ewok's old melody there either. The addition of the celebration on Coruscant, this is the Empire's capital city... I find it hard to believe there would be celebrations on that scale, sure the Emperor is lost as well as most of the Imperial Navy, but the Empire is huge and im sure had a major presence on the capital homeworld, and thus celebration would have been squashed quickly and brutally.

  122. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    But without Star Wars, all we'd have today is the original series running in syndication.

    Your inference seems to be that this is a bad thing. I'm puzzled.
    That would be my preference. I didn't mind star trek movies #2 and #4, but I'd be willing to sacrafice them to prevent 1,3,5, and any next-generation anything from having been made. Just one man's opinion.

  123. No flame here... by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    I was raised on the holy trinity of Kirk/Spock/McCoy, and I AGREE with you. Let them come...

    Seriously, Star Trek episodes were an exercise in morality, with ongoing character development, where it behooved you to have seen previous episodes to catch all the jokes in the next one. I don't consider it soap opera though - that would be Dark Shadows. Soap opera for goths.

    I watched Star Trek every day after school, along with Dark Shadows and Dr. Who. I dare say Dr. Who wasn't really sci-fi either.

    *ducks*

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  124. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by SkipNewarkDE · · Score: 1

    I actually have one of the ORIGINAL Fox video rental-only copies from the very first video release... And it still plays. Wonder how much THAT little treasure is worth?

  125. blocks reign supreme!!! by sootman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    with all the zillions of dollars lucas spent cleaning it up, how did NO ONE notice the blocks still visible around the TIE fighters during the fight scene with the falcon in Ep 4?!?!?

    trilogy owners: look at 1:35:16 for one example.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:blocks reign supreme!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      i dont know but i didnt notice them on my vhs copy.. they probably missed it too.. but watching the dvds with powerdvd and the eaglevision color enhancements, the damn blocks are a bright blue and very visible =(

  126. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by kiskoa · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Fox video stereo edition
    2. PROFIT!
    3. "THX" edition
    4. PROFIT!
    5. Laserdisc
    6. PROFIT!
    7. Special Edition
    8. PROFIT!
    9. Special Edition - Letterbox
    10. PROFIT!
    11. Special Edition on DVD
    12. PROFIT!

    (sorry I could not find out where to put the ??? patr)

    --
    If Yoda so strong in Force is, why words in right order he cannot put?
  127. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I take it you hated DS9 with a firey vengence too, along with all the other good Sci-fi series that rode Next Gen's wake (Babylon 5, for instance). For that matter, we wouldn't have Terminator 1 & 2, and (here's the biggie), no LOTR Films. Why, you ask? Because thanks to the Star Wars trilogy, special effects became an industry, rather than just something they did occassionally when one film or another called for it (meaning no WETA Digital).

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  128. distill it down by robotoil · · Score: 1

    who needs to read 11,000 words on this. I could probably watch the movies in that time. Better yet, instead of 11,000 words, just give me 11 pictures.

  129. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Without "Star Wars", would "Star Trek: TMP" have been possible?"

    Yes. TMP was originally 'Star Trek: Phase II', a new series that they started building sets for. When the change was made to TMP, it was still well before SW had come out. ST was coming whether SW was there or not.

    A better question would be "Was STII a result of Star Wars?" I personally believe the answer is still no, as nothing in the first movie indicated there would be any sort of SW's action. But, still, I imagine somebody has an interesting alternative point of view.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  130. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Hobadee · · Score: 0

    2 things:
    First, I'm just waiting for all 9 to come out in the "super duper last ever we promise StarWars rocks" box set.

    Second, Episode 3 *should* rock. Ya, 1&2 kinda sucked (I still enjoyed em) but episode 3 - thats the clone wars baby! Anikan becomes Darth. etc... Basically 3 will be one huge, awesome, battle. On top of that, it will be kind of like episode 5 (Empire Strikes Back - Best one in my opinion) cause the evil guys will win. w00t. I love evil prospering over good - its so much more - real lifeish.

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  131. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah. Just made it last night actually...

  132. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

    I haven't purchased any of the SE, originals, or what not. I haven't even seen the first half of return of the Jedi.

    I haven't bought the dvds yet although i plan to.

  133. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be my preference. I didn't mind star trek movies #2 and #4

    Now that's got to be a troll. You can't seriously be claiming you liked the one with the wales??? The only one worse than that was the one with a god at the center of the galaxy.

  134. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
    "from hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee"

    Uh, wasn't that actually from Moby Dick?

  135. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    I just watched the remastered _A New Hope_, and during the sandtrooper scene, all I could think of was the immortal words of Dark Helmet:

    "Comb the desert!"
  136. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well maybe if *YOU* bought the DVD set, it would make the thrid-time. There are many of us who don't own any other copies of the original Star Wars trilogy in any format and this will be the first-time owning them you insensitve clod!

  137. Warning! Spoiler here! by kkovach · · Score: 1

    Darth Vader is really Luke's father!

    - Kevin

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  138. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by dirtkilla · · Score: 1

    How about Video Disk? Video Disk I only have Empire though.

  139. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to read "The Star Wars" screenplay. It would seem that it is:

    1. Write an embarrassingly bad screenplay.
    2. ???
    3. Becomes a colossal hit. (Profit.)

    -Peter

  140. The thing that is bugging me... by deke_kun · · Score: 1

    Is this unexplainable BLUE DOOR...The escape pod from the Tantive IV seems to have been the set for a low budget series of commercials starring the droids, and a rapping salami, set all on bluescreen. Its the only explanation that makes sense!

    Find it at 8:50 in ANH, if youre that way inclined.

    1. Re:The thing that is bugging me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it looks more like some color problem with the footage, if you look closely the blue goes beyond the door and covers some of the sand.

      Theres a shot in ANH that has color problems also, its a shot of R2 in the x-wing, its almost black and white, the color is horrible and the image is sorta blurry.. they should have fixed that =(

  141. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    yeah... but Khan said it too.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  142. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3'rd time? Lemme see...

    1] Beta
    2] VHS
    3] Laser disk standard edition(s)
    4] Laser disk directors cuts
    5] VHS re-releases
    6] DVD

    No wonder I hate lucas! He owes me a house!

  143. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by JWW · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why are you here?

    or

    This is not the discussion you're looking for. Move along....

  144. In Star Wars, the future is a mess. by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "A long time ago in a galaxy far far away..."

    nuff said. Their first sentance is inaccurate. If anything the *PAST* is in a mess... Anyway my 2 cents.

    1. Re:In Star Wars, the future is a mess. by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      "A long time ago in a galaxy far far away..." is not the future, stupid journalist.

      That's a typo. Lucas is planning to fix it in the DVD release.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:In Star Wars, the future is a mess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have written "future DVD release" for extra pun intended

  145. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by kisrael · · Score: 1

    To be fair, "???" involves make up some fantastic action-y special effects with a whole new FX studio, this whole cool "boiler plate" style of modeling and special camera control, and figure out how to show just enough of a universe so it looks tantalizingly huge and like the audience is just seeing a part of it...give the man some credit, the first movie really broke some new ground in a lot of ways.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  146. Plagiarism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    had a gritty, industrial look, a jaded cynicism that had rarely been expressed in cinema before

    I can't post a URL, but I'm 100% sure I've read exactly this phrase in at least 15 movie reviews starting about 20 years ago.

    The true thrust of dystopianism in film is usually agreed to be the merger of ... and Film Noir. This achieved critical mass with

    We've read this, too, in a dozen movie reviews, with various things replacing the 3 dots. I wonder how difficult it would be to write a program that would write movie reviews?

  147. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVD was not available then.

  148. Going from great to good by jnd3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I haven't seen anyone else, anywhere, mentioning the ONE thing that absolutely ruined ESB for me. The scene occurs right after Luke jumps down the shaft in Cloud City. Darth Vader is walking out, and the only words out of his mouth are a husky-sounding, "Bring my shuttle." There was a depth of emotion -- anger, sadness -- that I picked up on in that little scene.

    Now they've got this lame voice-over from Vader, "Alert the commander to prepare for my arrival," or something like that. Throw in some re-used footage from RotJ (Vader's Death Star II arrival) for when he lands on his flagship and you've taken ALL the emotion out of Vader's revelation and its consequences (at least on his part).

    Everything else I could cope with ... yeah, Han shoots first, but whatever ... more digital aliens, gives the ILM guys good practice ... but in my opinion that single scene took a great movie and made it into a merely good movie.

    1. Re:Going from great to good by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      That does sound like a horrible addition (another good reason for me to stick with my LD rips), but what troubles me about your post and many others is that you've been fine with all this change and fiddling with and alteration with no ability to purchase the originals... right up until there is one little thing that bugs you. THEN it becomes a problem. You only make a noise when it personally effects you, without seeing that it's been an important issue of movie preservation before then too.

      Oh well, at least now you see why the new versions suck.

    2. Re:Going from great to good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't the only one, that is the one scene that bugged me the most also. There is just no rhyme or reason for that change, it is absolutely, completely pointless, in the most climatic scene, to _add_ more jargon/dialogue to a scene where obviously, less is more.

    3. Re:Going from great to good by jnd3 · · Score: 1

      Well ... I own the originals on VHS. And the 1997 re-releases. And now the DVDs. I'd happily shell out the coin for the originals on DVD, but I'll take what I can get, because I love these movies. More precisely, I love the story that these movies tell.

      The problem I have with a strict view of "movie preservation" is that it takes a static view of a fluid medium. Should Star Wars be taken as like The Mona Lisa, or is it more similar to one of Beethoven's symphonies?

      In the case of The Mona Lisa, there is a single authentic version -- static, unchanging, perfect in its original form. But Beethoven's symphonies have been performed by orchestras and ensembles around the world, and each performance is different -- both from each other, and likely from Ludwig's intent.

      I tend to take the view that movies fall into the latter category, a fluid medium. But that's just me.

    4. Re:Going from great to good by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      "In the case of The Mona Lisa, there is a single authentic version -- static, unchanging, perfect in its original form. But Beethoven's symphonies have been performed by orchestras and ensembles around the world, and each performance is different -- both from each other, and likely from Ludwig's intent."

      Yes, but you can still get copies of many, many versions of the performance, not just the last one. There's not a worldwide removal of all previous performances with a statement that only the most recent is the 'true' version.

      I have absolutely no problem with directors doing this, it's just in THIS one case the director has decided that this is the ONLY version you're allowed to see anymore, and that's the problem.

  149. Some moderator got it, here's an explanation you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The link above is proof of concept showing that no matter how bad Lucas runs amok, it is possible for others to restore the integrity of the plot.

    Hell, it should be an option on the damn DVD:

    • Han shoots : first
    • Ewoks : lite
    • Remove Jar-Jar scenes
  150. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by MustardMan · · Score: 1

    We ain't found SHIT!

  151. Come on, it's "whales"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Don't pay any attention to him -- he did a little too much LDS in the 60's!"


    And TOS (and "The Outer Limits", "Twilight Zone") showed that you could tell science fiction storys without a huge special-effects budget. Hell, most of the sets looked like a college play, at best. It's sad that that point is lost on today's producers. I guess the kids like shiny things.

  152. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by cparisi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah! In fact I am sick of constantly reading news for nerds! I wish it would stop!

  153. A new way to be pissed at Lucas. by Master_Torrez · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed the crappy box this DVD came in. Its the most flimsy thing I've ever seen and its all I can do to keep it safe. The Lord of the Rings Special edition boxes are the way to go. Hardback box sets are the only way to do DVD box sets

  154. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Gleng · · Score: 1

    Yes, but this time, it purchased me first.

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  155. Look! I got an OT M$ bash in a Star Wars thread!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Lucas is getting like Microsoft -- patching his mistakes provides a steady stream of revenue!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  156. sound changes in the DVDs by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    I haven't watched all the way through all of them yet, but I have found a couple of minor sound changes that are on the DVD set that were not on the regular Special Edition.

    A New Hope: In the scene where Luke and Leia are running down the Death Star hallway and get to the dead-end bridge, there is a famous sound effect mistake/joke. There are stormtroopers shooting at them while Luke is trying to get his grappling hook ready to swing across. In only that scene, the blaster Luke and Leia are using to shoot back is making *bang* sounds like a .45 magnum or something. On this DVD release, it has been changed to the normal laser sound.

    Empire Strikes Back: In previous editions, the same scream sound effect was used for the Emperor falling down the shaft on the Death Star as when Luke fell down the shaft in Cloud City. In this new edition, Luke falls silently--no scream of any kind. I have not watched the emperor section of ROTJ yet to see if the Emperor still yells; my guess would be he probably does.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  157. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by mitherial · · Score: 1

    Indeed there is a betamax version of at least the original Star Wars, I have seen it. Don't know about Empire or Jedi

    --
    Foo?
  158. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another way to look at it is, without Star Trek, would Star Wars have been possible? No trying to fbe a troll, but, I don't think it would've been possible. IMHO, Star Trek:TOS made Star Wars Possible and Star Wars made Star Trek:TMP, TNG, DS9, etc. possible. So it could be said that the made each other.

  159. Awful color effects... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

    I first noticed 'em on Tatooine when the droids are wandering around the desert about 10 minutes in. C3PO is surrounded by a greenish haze that flickers in and out. The artificial "twilight" when R2D2 is rolling down the Jawa canyon is somewhat disconcerting. The rocks on the ground have severely out-of-gamut highlights; they look like fiberglass props with lights inside. Not bad, making real rocks look fake.

  160. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, the Star Wars Universe was huge! Several planets! Dagobah! with, um, a shrimpy toad guy. Hoth! with, um, a scary snow guy! Tatooine! with, um, a big mouth in the desert. Coruscant! with, um 10 Jedi Knights! and about a hundred Storm Troopers

    To be honest, I always found a certain "claustrophia" in the Star Wars movies. You understand the "universe" of the story is huge, but it never really feels like anything more than a handful of heroes, two bad guys and a small swarm of targets (Storm Troopers, Ewoks, Battle Droids). Look at the Death Star with it's thousands, er, hundreds, well, basically about 3 locations. Look at the massive battle on Naboo with millions, er, thousands, well... maybe a hundred Gungans.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  161. Copyrights by pf_grenoblois · · Score: 1

    An important point imho is that "A new hope" dates back to 1977, and therefore the copyrights are already more than 25 years old. Editing the films allows GL to start again with fresh copyrights for whoever will inherits them from him.

  162. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by pod · · Score: 1
    You are a sucker for purchasing this for the third time.

    Unless you're buying it for the first time....

    --
    "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  163. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    Apparently you misunderstood the use of bold in my post. I seperated Star Wars part from the Star Trek part. I thought I was clear is saying what I would give up and what exactly I would prevent. Yes, DS9 is included in that list, for me. Babylon 5, Terminator, LoTR et al are not Star Trek related and therefore are also outside the scope of the discussion. If you have a different opinion, terrific! Please don't try to strawman me into sharing it, however.

  164. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  165. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    Actually, "the one with the wales" was my favorite. While it is popular on slashdot to confuse 'opinion' with 'troll', my opinion is that those movies were at least watchable, while the others are not. That is just my opinion. You don't have to share it, but there's no chance of you changing it through this forum.

  166. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Oligonicella · · Score: 0

    Da Vinci did live into senility and kept the Mona Lisa with him until he died. So, no. He wasn't as obsessivly senile as a certain film maker.

  167. is there a spoiler warning by pbjones · · Score: 1

    did they say what happens at the end?

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  168. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But without Star Wars, all we'd have today is the original series running in syndication.

    Is that such a bad thing? Have you seen this new Enterprise show yet? I liked TOS and TNG, but everything after those two seems severely lacking, much like these prequal trilogies for Star Wars.

  169. It's just a tagline by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Come on, that's just a tagline that shows at the beginning, because this film series is an homage to the storytelling of old serials like Flash Gordon. It's a sci-fi fantasy adventure film, and referring to "the future" in this case refers to the fictional futuristic environment it takes place in. Don't be so anal...

  170. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it would have been made without SW, but no way it would have gotten the monstrous budget (for the time) that it got.

  171. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by kisrael · · Score: 1

    I guess for me it comes from showing things but not over-explaining them. (Of course the Expanded Universe stuff does a good job of that) Grungy ships, lots of different robots, some dropped referenes (Kessel Run, Nerf herder), ESB and RotJ had some big feeling in the battles, etc.

    Now of course the prequels undoes a lot of that...we're back on the Tatooine! Again! And this kid MADE 3CP0! And when they do throw in new stuff, sometimes it's amazingly petty-- look! it's a tax dispute on a random fringe world!

    I absolutely agree that it doesn't feel like a whole-Galaxy-dominating Empire though, despite a # of throwaway lines, I'd buy like...300 or 400 worlds, tops. And "small moon"...yeah yeah yeah.

    Anyway, maybe I was just a dumb kid, but the original trilogy felt pretty wide open to me. People raised on better scifi than I was may differ.

    Death Star had...lessee, conference room, big laser room, big landing bay, a few random hallways, control room, prison level, trash compactor, room outside of landing bay, pit to swing through, pit to disable tractor beam, place for Emperor to sit around and watch things...not too bad for an hour or so of movie. Oh and outside it had gun emplacements, a trench, a big laser dish, and a little hole to make it go boom. And a big glowing core to make it go boom again.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  172. Re:"Star Wars" Made "Star Trek: TMP" Possible by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Erin Gray in that tight little bodysuit..

    http://images.google.com/images?q=erin%20buck%20 ro gers&num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&sa=N&tab= wi

  173. The Bantha-sized review ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is Bantha Poodoo ...

  174. In other words by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    Han subscribed to the Bush doctrine.

    1. Re:In other words by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, considering Star Wars is older than the Bush doctrine.... who subscribes to what now?

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  175. why is star wars still an object of worship? by carcosa30 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seems to me the last good movie in the franchise was Empire Strikes Back. That was in what, 1980? That being the case, why do people still live and die by the series?

    This phenomenon is even more extreme than the Trek-worship thing. Trek's overall quality level is far higher than that of Star Wars. And, uhhhh... that's saying something.

    Yoda != Ghandi.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carcosa == undeniable JACKASS

    2. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by humankind · · Score: 1

      This isn't a troll. Bunch of SW sycophants here. Have an open mind and don't impulsively moderate please.

    3. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      Sue me, I don't like watching them piss away something I loved when it first came out, and all in the name of selling Jarjar Binks action figures.

      Are you saying you LIKED episode 1?

      BTW I think "jackass" == anonymous drivebys :D

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    4. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. It's people like "Anonymous Coward" who are responsible for the condition of the Star Wars franchise. They're so conditioned by their media worship that they'll buy literally anything that contains the Star Wars rubric. I loved the original series, but JESUS ep1 was a horrible film.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    5. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think? Now, there's a huge stretch. ROTFL! Episode 1 was fantastic and you are still a jackass.

    6. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      You're smoking crack, fanboy. EP1 was almost universally reviled and generally agreed to be a marketing device to milk the dregs of the series. Sorry to burst your bubble about that.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    7. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anybody is on drugs here it is you. You opinion doesn't seem to count for much, sorry.


      It's the 5th highest grossing box office film of all time. That hardly classifies as universally reviled.


      It just goes to show that most here at /. have no concept of reality.


      Sorry to shatter your universal perception.

    8. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1
      my god, I didn't believe that until I looked at the site. I had no idea! I guess I stand corrected about it being universally reviled. However, McDonalds is the highest-grossing restaurant chain on the planet, and it's sure as hell not the best.
      It just goes to show that most here at /. have no concept of reality.
      They sure don't. Most of them agree with you.
      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    9. Re:why is star wars still an object of worship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not from what I've been reading. Seems I need to sign up for an account...

      By the "not the best" logic, however, that could be interpreted to imply that Titanic, Star Wars, Shrek 2, E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace, Spider-Man, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Spider-Man 2, The Passion of the Christ, Jurassic Park aren't "the best" either. They're only the top 10.

      It's true that best sales don't necessarily imply the best of anything, but those numbers do imply popularity. Generally the most popular are deemed the best by the masses.

      This also implies that LCD logic too though.

  176. "What Will I Look Like in Heaven?" by Databass · · Score: 1

    I think the point is, perhaps when your body is killed and your "spirit" joins the Force, you can appear as however you want to appear. You appear as how you see yourself.

    Obi-Wan and Yoda were at peace with their older selves, their older selves embodied the wisdom they had gained over their lifetimes, so that's how they appeared.

    Maybe Anakin wanted to see the Force Image of himself as when he was young and in the prime of his life, before he turned to the Dark Side, instead of the burned, crippled nightmare body he died as. The crippled ghost has a certain amount of pathos, though, because it says he lived so long with that image of himself it carried into his afterlife. I guess it's up to you to decide which you think fits best.

  177. Best of both worlds. by ezthrust · · Score: 1
    Those are the changes that disturb me the most also.

    What I would like to see is an edit done between the "special edition" dvds and the THX laserdiscs (there are dvd-r ready torrents out there)that keep the zippy new special effects, but knock out all the crap the SE screwed us over on.

    I wonder what the "Phantom Edit" guy is up to?

  178. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
    Come, come, I like to bash Star Wars as much as the next guy, but you are overdoing it a tad. In the original trilogy we do get to see a few other planets/moons as well, Alderaan (well, we see it explode), the fourth moon of Yavin (which apparently doesn't deserve its own name), Cloud City on Bespin. It doesn't help, though, that we keep going back to f&^$$ing Tatooine again and again. I agree with the other poster - it's not a galactic empire, it's a few hundred planets. And yeah, I can agree that there aren't enough people around (put that down to the cost of extras, I guess - notice how the the CGI bits added in to Mos Eisley in the special edition of Star Wars has more creatures, and the CGI cities in the new trilogy seem pretty crowded). But there is one exception to your assertion that the battles seem smale scale, the battle on Hoth - that always seemed impressive to me.

    But it's all just fantasy anyway ...

    --
    The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  179. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your also forgeting the CED versions (video vinyl).

  180. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come, come, I like to bash Star Wars as much as the next guy

    I began to make a serious point and just started having fun with it. Books often have the same problem too. Tolkien, Eddings and Pratchett created worlds which are both large and well fleshed-out. Science fiction is a little harder because a realistic scale means your universe is IMMENSE, but it happens. The problem with movies is that its easier to connect to a story that focuses on a single hero or a small group of heroes. The only good exception that I can think is Apollo 13, where all the NASA engineers, working together with the astronauts were the heroes.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  181. I do solemnly declare... by RobinH · · Score: 1

    ... I will NOT purchase these DVDs, and my relatives are instructed not to buy them for me. I will only buy the THX remastered version on DVD, which we've been promised will never be released.

    Screw Lucas. 50 years from now I'll still have my VHS tapes. Of course, I may have to get a video capture card and do the DVD thing myself.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  182. source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, beginning of the second paragraph. Says Episode II was the first.

  183. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So l0z3r? But the game rocks.

  184. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's just what I'm sure of off the top of my head.

    Yeah, you left out the RCA SelectaVision CED version.

  185. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ain't buyin' again until the HD-DVD version.

  186. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    No kidding. I said basically the same thing and they said I was trolling.

    How much can they milk a series?

    'Course, Starwars Galaxies makes Episode 1 look like great cinema. So I think the whoring of the franchise has only begun.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  187. Why hasn't anyone strangled Lucas yet? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I really don't know why everyone thinks Lucas deserves the benefit of the doubt, or anything like that.

    You've all seen EP1 & EP2, so you know he's now making movies that nobody but a little kid would find interesting... From start to finish, EP2 looks like it's all a big cartoon, with the contrast turned up too far. Without a doubt, he would completely rape EP4,5,6 if the technology was advanced enough that he could.

    You can see these new movies, remember what the originals were like, and just mentally dismiss the changes, but imagine you're seeing the movies for the first time. The changes he's made really ruin the whole movie, and it bothers me to think that the great trilogy will not be around for future generations to watch. I'll be keeping my VHS copies under lock and key. Sure, they may not be visually quite as good as these remastered version, but video quality makes little difference. It's only for mindless action movies with no story where the quality means more than the content.

    Thank goodness for the internet... Hopefully it won't take long for the "Phantom Edit" version to come out, minus the crap Lucas added.

    Frankly, you just have to suck it up and admit, even though he somehow managed to make a very good trillogy, whatever made it work is gone now, and he's nothing but a hack who has been riding his dumb luck for decades.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  188. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    ...because they hadn't invented DVD the first two times around.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  189. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by ppanon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It doesn't help, though, that we keep going back to f&^$$ing Tatooine again and again

    That's because Tatooine is the source of spice. Without it the empire would come to a standstill because ships could no longer travel through hyperspace. The spice is produced by Sarlaccs and.... oh never mind.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  190. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Fred_A · · Score: 1

    I think I was 11 when the first movie came out and it was lots of fun at the time. However, there is one thing I still don't like :

    Why can't stormtroopers shoot ?

    Don't these guys ever go to a shooting range or something, are those supposed to be the elite force of the empire ? They are absolutely pathetic.

    And don't even get me started on the droids in ep1. Can't hit a stationnary target that's 10m away ? Who the hell wrote their software ?

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  191. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by R.Caley · · Score: 1
    It doesn't help, though, that we keep going back to f&^$$ing Tatooine again and again.

    Loath as I am to defend Lucas' lack of imagination, it does make sense in the context of the story. If the kids comes from there, then his family will be there, so that is where Luke gets dumped with his uncle.

    I suppose you could also support the return in Jedi in the same kind of way -- Solo was there because he delt with someone there, and so that was where he got dragged back to. However, it would have been so easy to give Jabba a home on another planet.

    However, one thing I think it's important to remember is that Lucas' stated aim was not to produce good SF. He was aiming to create the feel of a pulp series, and those were always claustrophobic. How many planets Ming the Merciless rule?

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  192. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

    (sorry I could not find out where to put the ??? patr)
    It's in at 6b:

    6. PROFIT!
    6b. Improvements???
    7. Special Edition
    8. PROFIT!

    Hope this helps...

    Mark

    --
    Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  193. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The technology that lets aliens fire first was not available until now.

  194. Mind diarrhea by c0p0n · · Score: 1

    ...but to make Greedo look evil. He is more evil than Han Solo after all. You can say he's as much as...

    Blah blah blah mental masturbation blah blah blah

    --

    Your head a splode
  195. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who the hell wrote their software?

    Star Fleet Redshirts.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  196. Why hasn't anyone strangled evilviper yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem here is the internet. It gives every no-talent hack armchair reviewer with no idea of what they babble about a voice that they clearly don't deserve. Then it allows them to subject the rest of us to their valueless opinion.

    1. Re:Why hasn't anyone strangled evilviper yet? by ogonzoo · · Score: 1
  197. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    And a massive re-write. Seriously, that draft is a piece of crap.

    It is also suspiciously similar to EP1 on a lot of themes and plot points . . .

    On the up side there is some fucking in a control room closet.

    -Peter

  198. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    IIRC there were at least two LaserDisc editions.

  199. Wrong by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    Star Trek: Phase II never caught on

    This is wrong. They even had costumes made and sets build already. As well as actors casted. They reused some stuff for the motion picture. Decker was meant as would-be-replacement for Kirk if Shatner got too expensive and the actor who played Commander Branch in the movie was supposed to be a vulcan replacement for Spock as Nimoy had no interst in another TV-series. Lieutenant Ilia was also written for the series and later kinda reintroduced as Diana Troy. A lot of the concepts for phase II made it into Next Generation anyway.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079945/trivia

    http://www.robsacc.nl/ottens/conceptart-startrek.h tml

  200. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by pete-classic · · Score: 1
    Mitherial's sig as I write this is:

    On "Bubba Ho-tep" with Bruce Campbell "If you see one ELVIS VS. MUMMY movie this year... This Is It!"


    At least half of that DVD's value is in the Elvis commentary. Even if you never listen to commentary tracks, give this one a shot. Listening to "Elvis" eat popcorn and keep saying "What the hell kinda picture is this?" is worth the rental.

    -Peter
  201. OT: Your sig--I call BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sig currently reads:

    'When I had a sig critical of John Kerry, suddenly I was repeatedly modded down as "Troll" and "Overrated."'

    Dude, newsflash for ya. You "suddenly" got modded down as "Troll" and "Overrated" because most of what you post is overrated and/or troll material. And that's not even considering the fact that putting inflammatory material in your sig is a classic trolling technique.

    I call bullshit.

  202. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solo was on Tatooine because he was going to pay Jabba off. He told Greedo that he had the money. That's how Luke and Han met. Otherwise, how would a farmer's kid on a backwater planet have ever met up with Solo? So Jabba couldn't have been on another planet. We return to Tatooine because many of the people central to the story are from there or met there.

  203. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the Viewmaster edition, and the film-strip version.

  204. Nope ... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    That scene really was supposed to be in the original movie, though. They just didn't have the technology at the time to pull it off.
    (The original idea, I think, was to replace the actor standing in for Jabba with a puppet shot on a blue screen.)

    I call crap. If they wanted to replace the fat guy in fur with a puppet in 1976/1977 they would have had to do the scene with green/blue-screen or rear projection. (Watch the Rancor scene in RotJ) In 1977 there would have been absolutely no way to replace that actor in that scene as it was shot. (With all the interacting with and walking behind Harrison Ford) And why on earth would there be need for the fur costume?

    No, that fur guy was planned as Jabba. Time constraints called for cuts and a Jabba that doesn't show up is somewhat more sinister anyway. Hitchcock taught us that what isn't shown in movies can be the most menacing.

    However, after it became apparent that they couldn't do that scene with current technology, they moved all the information learned in that scene to the scene with Greedo.

    So, yes, the scene is totally redundant and looked wrong (because it was originally designed around a different Jabba) as shot. This is why the 1997 version had Han Solo step on Jabbas tail - Harrison Ford walked around the stand-in in the original shot, before they really knew what Jabba would look like.

    If they really had planned to replace the irish fur guy they would have needed to film Han (foreground), Jabba (middle) and the Falcon (background) seperately. Which they didn't. Which proves they never wanted to replace the irish fur model. And it would have looked shitty anyway. And it still wouldn't make sense to give a standin a costume.

    I can't really find any good links on it, [...]

    Because it's not true.

    Link to pic of how the scene looked when shot:

    http://www.exn.ca/news/images/1997/02/06/19970206- before.jpg

    Why use a costume for a stand-in who is supposed to replaced by some speacial effect gimmick?

    1. Re:Nope ... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Meh, I think I originally heard that factoid from some Star Wars Special Addition Making Of special, so it's entirely possible that it was Lucas revising history again.

      He claimed in an interview about that scene that he originally wanted to do some sort of special effect to make the guy there be some sort of space alien but couldn't pull it off.

      Maybe the interview is on the special discs? I don't know, because I don't actually care enough about Star Wars to buy the new DVD set.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:Nope ... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      Meh, I think I originally heard that factoid from some Star Wars Special Addition Making Of special, so it's entirely possible that it was Lucas revising history again.

      This is entirely possible. Sorry if I came across somewhat impolite, but it gives me the screeps experiencing a new kinda urban myth being spread on the web :)

      He claimed in an interview about that scene that he originally wanted to do some sort of special effect to make the guy there be some sort of space alien but couldn't pull it off.

      Sounds like an aged director suffering of delusions. Check: George Lucas.

      Maybe the interview is on the special discs? I don't know, because I don't actually care enough about Star Wars to buy the new DVD set.

      I plan to rent them to have a look at the new making of. Still I would like to have the making of from the seventies ...

  205. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by lga · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that the laserdiscs come in PAL editions as well as NTSC!

  206. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

    ...except that Episode 3 is being directed by Lucas himself, who was personally responsible for the shit that was Episodes 1 & 2. And if you're waiting for another "Empire Strikes Back", don't - Lucas didn't direct that one, which is at least partially why it remains the best of the series.

    Lucas had a great idea in Star Wars, but he is not a great director. He can't cast, he can't direct, and he shouldn't be taken seriously as a director. (Just like M. Night Shyamalan)

  207. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by mitherial · · Score: 1

    I haven't even seen the DVD yet (saw it at the theater) will have to do that.

    --
    Foo?
  208. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    How about:
    You're a sucker for buying this peice of shit at all!

  209. Re:11 Words on the Star Wars Trilogy DVDs (Condens by pod · · Score: 1

    You're getting awefully worked up about this... I spent CDN45 on this box set, that's $10/movie + extras. Seems like a good deal to me, as far a nice releases of old movies go, and I don't think it's a piece of shit. You'll easily spend that much money on an average Criterion Collection release. Now, the relative merits of each are arguable, and a matter of taste. Just relax, it's not even your money.

    --
    "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"