Slashdot Mirror


Don't Click Here For A Free iPod

fermion writes "Do you wonder what all those free iPods links are about? Do you wonder why apparently rational Slashdot users would use their .sig line to push an offer that seems little more than a thinly veiled pyramid scheme? Answers to these questions can be found in this NYT article (personal information, with no free iPod, is required). The plan itself seems simple. Rat out your friends to advertisers, and get a free gadget. The firm in question, Gratis, Inc, gets a bounty on each customer. The firm claims to have a revenue of $15 million in 2004. They claim to give away 500 iPods a week. If, as the article claims, each contact earns a bounty of around $50, we might presume that 1 in 12 contacts get a free iPod. This firm seem fairly upfront. Another firm mentioned in the article, Consumer Research Corporation, seems much less so. As always, read the fine print."

594 comments

  1. Read this carefully by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want you all to read this very carefully: Nothing is free , except true charity and this is decidedly not charity. Somebody (Gratis Inc.) is making money. Let me tell you a secret.....your identity and demographic information is valuable. Individually, it means very little, but when you sell out your friends to get in on this scheme, numbers start adding up and marketing firms and companies are paying big for this information, thus the 500 iPods/week adding up to $6.5 Million US/year and the company is decidedly making a tidy profit on top of this expenditure.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is the real article this badly formatted?

      You are an idiot. You can't even karma whore on Slashdot properly.

    2. Re:Read this carefully by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whenever a /. article is posted about some nifty little DIY project that can save you from spending a few hundred dollars on a consumer model or whatever, the value of one's time always comes into question. How much money are you saving if the project takes X hours of your time?

      I think the deal is similar here. In the end you're getting a free portable music player (I believe they offer TVs and such, too, right?), but you have to sign up for free trials and things like that. You also have to shamelessly whore yourself out to your friends and family, to rope them into the scheme. Then there's the whole personal information thing the parent mentioned. After months of your own ridiculous marketing, is it really worth it?

    3. Re:Read this carefully by eeg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think most people care their information is being sold away. It's really not that big of a deal.

      You can spam me all you please, if you'll give me a free iPod first.

    4. Re:Read this carefully by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that the next time you buy something from Apple or whoever they sell the info too you are paying for that "free ipod". They add PR/marketing/e.g. "NOT ENGINEERING" expenses to the cost of the product.

      I think everyone should listen to Pacifica for oh I dunno, a fundraiser or two ;-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Read this carefully by Incadenza · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nothing is free

      "There is no such thing as a free lunch, unless you are the lunch."
    6. Re:Read this carefully by LGagnon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing is free

      This said on a web site that constantly talks about open source software. Don't get me wrong, nothing tangible is free, but but its a whole different situation with intellectual property.

    7. Re:Read this carefully by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Dude! I found this really cool thing a while back.

      It's called "Linux". Try googling it.

    8. Re:Read this carefully by Surazal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mom would have issues with me sending her privacy information to a nameless soulless corporation.

      Hence, you can count me in as one of many people to decline this offer. Hope that helps.

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    9. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to fuck up your karma. XD

      Moll.

    10. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spamming slashdot does not all of a sudden become appropriate just because you are posting in a story about spammers.

    11. Re:Read this carefully by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      • I don't think most people care their information is being sold away. It's really not that big of a deal.

      I care.

      That's why I trade supermarket "coupon" cards whenever I get a chance. It is better than avoiding the cards because trading has the potential to poison the data collection. If I simply refuse, they have a valid data set on those who use the cards (most people). But poisoned data can be dangerous if used as the basis for financial decisions. I'd love it if people made card trading a regular process.

      And don't give me any lip about "improving customer service by stocking the right items". Stores have been able to track their stock - what sells and what doesn't for ages. There really is no valid reason for the store to know exactly what I purchase individually. They can get the stock right by looking at things on a storewide level.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    12. Re:Read this carefully by elmegil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lots of people care. But guess what? Chances are good, your information is already being "mined" by the credit card companies anyway. Might as well get something for your trouble, if you're so inclined. Me, I didn't like the pyramid style of it, so I didn't. But I certainly thought about it a bit, and others I know had their iPods in time for christmas. Could have been a nice stocking stuffer had I opted in....

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    13. Re:Read this carefully by new-black-hand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why are these companies always portrayed in a negative light with the assumption that they are bad? I see nothing wrong with Gratis - they are filling a need for the companies that are willing to pay up to $60 per lead. Gratis meet all their obligations to both clients and referred customers for their clients. Why must everyone then assume that they are somehow evil? They have made a lot of money doing what they do, and a lot of people have received iPods for their efforts - the owners are even willing to have their full names published in the NYT which shows that they have nothing to hide.

    14. Re:Read this carefully by penix1 · · Score: 1

      "I don't think most people care their information is being sold away. It's really not that big of a deal."

      It is a big deal. How would you like your 10 year old daughter's email winding up on every porn list known to man? Or maybe your mother's home address, phone #, email posted to alt.sex.milf?

      "You can spam me all you please, if you'll give me a free iPod first."

      But that's just the point. They don't give it to you *FIRST* but only after you have pimped your friend's and family's information out *AND* they have spent $$$$ on the cheap baubles offered.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    15. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are right. It isn't a troll, per se, but there isn't a "-1 Spam" moderation, so we have to make do with what we have.

      Actually, this post and the last one (and the 4-5 other posts you made after it) should have been marked as Redundant, not Troll. Bad moderator!

    16. Re:Read this carefully by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Dude! I found this really cool thing a while back.
      It's called "Linux". Try googling it.

      Dude! Don't be a smart ass. I will reiterate: Nothing is free. How many hours do you think have gone into Linux development? People's time is not free. It is worth something and if people wish to donate their time, that is their business, but arguably, Linux has proven its worth time and time again. I don't think anyone who contributes their efforts will believe their work valueless.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    17. Re:Read this carefully by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Linux is free. Just because people volunteered their time developing it doesn't mean it isn't free. That's like saying charity isn't free because it takes time to go drop off your cans at Salv. Army or whatever.

      And free!=valueless.

    18. Re:Read this carefully by bigberk · · Score: 1

      I'll give you an example. I have contributed development time to my favourite UNIX open source projects because I am helping build a product that I can use free rather than pay some other company for their solution. For my business I now use all kinds of free software that has been built with community support. This is saving me operating costs in the long term. (I am willing to spend time/money on free software, because in the long term it will save money).

    19. Re:Read this carefully by Lovepump · · Score: 0

      For the love God (sic), someone mod the parent up so the people browsing at +4 see it.

      Amen dude.

    20. Re:Read this carefully by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I trade supermarket "coupon" cards whenever I get a chance. It is better than avoiding the cards because trading has the potential to poison the data collection.

      yeah you must really be psyching those evil supermarket dudes out!

    21. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep going! I got my troll modifier on +5, see if you can get the endless deep troll thread award for 2004!

    22. Re:Read this carefully by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to people who posted really obtusely-formatted articles just to be funny because they were heavily laced with ads to the point of illegibility?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    23. Re:Read this carefully by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but would offering a cute screensaver for it change things?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    24. Re:Read this carefully by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      I would urge anyone who only wants to do one iPod offer to do the Centric free iPod.

      Not above whoring for referrals, eh? That makes your opinion so objective and worthwhile. Not.

    25. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, the supermarkets are evil? And Walmart is evil? Where am I supposed to go for my food, 7-11?

    26. Re:Read this carefully by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've often thought about a website devoted to courtesy card havoc. Maybe everyone uploads their number, and each week you print off a new barcode for yours. We could even have a week where we all use the same number simultaneously...

      Think about it. We'd drive the poor sap crazy that tries to do the actual data mining. "Here he is buying $500 worth of groceries in upstate NY, and 6 minutes later he is buying peanut butter with foodstamps in florida!"

      Of course, how long before the cease and desist letter was mailed?

    27. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You also have to shamelessly whored yourself out to your friends and family, to rope them into the scheme.

      So very true. Can I write that on my clue-by-four?

    28. Re:Read this carefully by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um you're so off base it hurts.

      Heck even giving out OSS isn't free. I have to pay for my cable modem to upload/host files. Then there is the time I spent working on OSS instead of working for the man...

      OSS [at least free OSS] is as much as it's about charity as it is community. OSS is certainly not free to produce and give out. It's just often mutually beneficial [e.g. work experience for the writer and something useful for the user].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    29. Re:Read this carefully by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Free is really a misnomer. Those ipods cost Apple money [or whoever is paying for the info]. In turn that costs more for products.

      You think the 1.20$ you spend on a 600mL pepsi goes all towards the bottle, drink and delivery? How about 10 million dollar contracts for titney spears to dance her tities on the TV? What about the high paid execs of pepsi and all their "essential" business expenses? etc, etc, etc...

      With OSS the "free" software comes at the expense of the author. They're literally paying for you to have a copy. They pay for their ISP or hosting [or they have someone pay for it] and they certainly have to expense the time they spent working on it instead of doing life chores.

      If anything an appropriate word would be "accessible". That is Linux is easy to get at.

      Perhaps the only really free thing in the world is the air you breath, the sun that warms you and anything that falls into crown assets.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    30. Re:Read this carefully by HanClinto · · Score: 1

      Are you serious about this? I find it hilarious. I would use it, and upload my Kroger courtesy card number into the pool. :)

    31. Re:Read this carefully by eeg3 · · Score: 1

      How would you like your 10 year old daughter's email winding up on every porn list known to man? Or maybe your mother's home address, phone #, email posted to alt.sex.milf?

      Uh, why would I give my daughter's email out to anyone when i'm signing up for things, if I wanted her email private? On the other hand, if she did it herself, she's obviously independent enough that I trust her to not care about, or filter out, 'bad stuff.' Also, why would the 'evil corporations' post emails that they paid for to alt.sex.milf? Those two hypotheticals seem absurd to me.

      By the way, I could sell the iPod and use the money from it to buy McAfee Spamkiller AND come out with a profit. It's a win-win situation.

    32. Re:Read this carefully by tigress · · Score: 1

      I'll send you an iPod for $1. All you need to do is to send me the $1 bill, then ask 50 of your friends to send me $1 each, then tell 50 of THEIR friends to send me $1 each. In addition, every one of your 50 friends can also get an iPod for $1, as long as every one of their 50 friends send me $1.

      (Substitute "sign up for blah" wherever appropriate)

    33. Re:Read this carefully by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have two of those cards. One is under the name "Carly Fiorina" and I use it for most purchases. The ither has my real name, and I only use it when I buy condoms or sour cream.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    34. Re:Read this carefully by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I'm quite serious. I've also got a kroger card, CVS, ukrops, food lion, etc. We could have a proper database, maybe even have it auto-email your new set for the week, complete with the barcode font stuff. Print it up on a shiny label, attach to card, voila!

      The thing is, it'd only be fun if it were high-profile (alot of us have to do it), and then it will be sued out of existence.

    35. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, you've forced the issue. I am now obligated to quote this JWZ in this thread:


      "Linux is only free if your time has no value."

    36. Re:Read this carefully by penix1 · · Score: 1

      "Uh, why would I give my daughter's email out to anyone when i'm signing up for things, if I wanted her email private?"

      You wouldn't but anybody else who had it (i.e. her friends who were signing up) just may.It isn't just your info they want but the info on your friends & family. Have you ever clicked one of those and seen what is required?

      "Also, why would the 'evil corporations' post emails that they paid for to alt.sex.milf?"

      The 'evil corporations' aren't going to be the ones who could post it (or worse) but the people they are selling it to are. Not everyone who buys those lists are right in the head....

      "By the way, I could sell the iPod and use the money from it to buy McAfee Spamkiller AND come out with a profit. It's a win-win situation."

      And you completely ignored the second half of my post. You don't get the iPod *FIRST* but only *AFTER* you have jumped through whatever hoops they feel you need to jump through to get it. This includes having to buy loads of crap that would far exceed the cost of the iPod.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    37. Re:Read this carefully by adpowers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of one of the Ferengi rule of acquisition #59: Free advice is seldom cheap.

      In this case, I think we can say, "Free iPod is seldom cheap."

      Andrew

    38. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh... You realize your "discount" card already tracks your purchases and ties them right back to yourself... Unless, of course, you are John Doe... :)

    39. Re:Read this carefully by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      People are upset with this company because they do not present the information about how the system works in the most truthful light.

      Of course, this is Slashdot, so people would only be fully satisfied if on the very front page it said that you would be receiving a lot of spam and telemarketing, and would need to get 5 friends to do the same. Personally, I think its a bit scummy they don't tell you about the 5 friends thing until the very end.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    40. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "The ither has my real name, and I only use it when I buy condoms..."

      This is /., so that card must never get used.

    41. Re:Read this carefully by accelleron · · Score: 1, Informative

      Karma whoring done properly:

      A Web Offer Too Good to Be True? Read the Fine Print
      By BARBARA WHITAKER

      Published: December 26, 2004

      THE e-mail messages are tantalizing: "Join now and receive a free I.B.M. laptop." "Your complimentary iPod with free shipping is waiting."

      These offers and similar ones on the Internet promise gifts for buying products or services. Are they for real? At best, yes, but they can also be riddled with problems. Participants may have to spend a lot to qualify or may not get the reward if they fail to follow what can be complicated rules. Ultimately, they may end up with nothing more than a big increase in spam as their e-mail address and other information is passed along or sold.

      Advertisement

      Complaint sites are filled with messages from consumers who say they participated in such programs only to come up empty-handed.

      One person, Vic of Northport, N.Y., participated in a deal and was disappointed in the experience. On a message board on RipOffReport.com, he wrote: "The lesson is that the only thing on this earth that is truly free is your mother's love. Everything else has a string or catch attached."

      Behind the offers are marketing companies whose goal is to generate customers for a wide range of businesses. They offer incentives - money or products - to people who sign up for items like credit cards, CD clubs or newspaper subscriptions. In return, the marketing company receives a fee, or bounty, for every customer it signs up.

      Although the marketing companies will not divulge what they are paid per person, those familiar with the business say it averages $40 to $60.

      This type of marketing is not new. But where companies once offered gifts like coffee mugs or beach towels in return for, say, signing up for a credit card, the Internet is making it possible for marketers to make more money by bringing multiple offers and consumers together. In return, they offer pricier enticements.

      Paul Bresson, a spokesman for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said no reports of fraud involving such operations had been made to the bureau's Internet Fraud Complaint Center (www.ifccfbi.gov). But he recommended that consumers examine such offers carefully.

      "The thing to know about this is that anybody can do it," said Gary Stein, a senior analyst at Jupiter Research, an Internet consultancy. "They can be fraudulent, real or somewhere in between."

      The marketers operate in numerous ways.

      Gratis Internet, a Web marketer based in Washington, has developed a system in which it buys pricey products like iPods - www.freeipods.com - and gives them away. To receive the iPod, participants are asked to sign up for one of about 10 different offers and to persuade five others to do the same. They have developed similar programs giving out $700 desktop computers (freedesktoppc.com), $800 flat-screen televisions (freeflatscreens.com) and high-end designer handbags (freehandbags.com). The main difference between the offers is how many others must be signed up for the main participant to receive the "free" merchandise. Its customers include Time Warner's AOL; BMG Music Service, a CD club owned by Bertelsmann; and USA Today, which is owned by the Gannett Company.

      Rob Jewell, co-founder of Gratis, says the company gives away 500 iPods a week. It posted revenue of nearly $5 million in 2003 and expects that to hit $15 million for 2004, he said.

      "It's a very cost-effective way for advertisers to attract new customers," said Mr. Jewell, who is 27, "and it's good for consumers as well because they're getting a piece of that."

      Mr. Jewell and his friend and business partner, Peter Martin, 28, started their operation with freecondoms.com, on which participants get points for purchases or signing up for programs, and the points can be redeemed for condoms.

      Then they realized if they incorporated more people into the process they could offer a bigger prize, which led to the iPod giveaway.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    42. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um, thousands of people have given tens, hundreds, or thousands of hours of their time and expertise to bring you the "free" software.

      The parent is correct. Nothing is free. We are just lucky enough to have people willing to give their time and coding expertise away for (usually) no monetary compensation.

      Time is money. If these people had even worked a minimum wage job instead during those many hours, you are still talking millions of dollars.

    43. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also good to remind people that you don't have to give the you social security card for the supermarket cards unless you want to cash checks. No need to have you SS# floating around anymore than it has to. I can thin kof 3 cases off to top of my head where supermarket emploies sold people identies.

    44. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing is free

      I have enough free gmail accounts to appear to be 10 different people. I can sign up my own fake accounts, and get something free.

    45. Re:Read this carefully by PlazMatiC · · Score: 1

      I buy sour cream all the time, you insensitive clod.

    46. Re:Read this carefully by accelleron · · Score: 1

      what the fuck? I'm in... I've got CVS, Walbaums, a few others

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    47. Re:Read this carefully by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Or you could just download SpamKiller and keep the iPod...

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    48. Re:Read this carefully by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better make up entirly fake cards. In getting a legitimate one and faking the barcode you might be breaching an agreement you have with them. If you don't have an agreement with them, what can they sue over? (that one was a serious question, not rhetorical - feel free to answer).

    49. Re:Read this carefully by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Not only that, OSS provides some code to newbies that books could not, a field experience of sorts. Plus it "magically" updates itself and broadens the pool of useful code experienced programmers draw from.

      It is thus well-worth the money and effort applied to it, in the end. A shady pyramid scheme that has a 10% chance of giving you an iPod if you complete a bunch of stringent requirements and requires you to sell out a bunch of people is not, for most. But what the hell, for some of us (those with a lack of disposable cash and an excess of free time) it provides a decent chance to get a gadget we would otherwise never get around to buying.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    50. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree whole heartedly. That's why I signed up with them, and gave them *your* email address.

    51. Re:Read this carefully by anagama · · Score: 1

      • I've often thought about a website devoted to courtesy card havoc.


      Brilliant! I've had a similar idea but I think yours is easier and more effective (multiple numbers in use at once) than mine was (mail card with SASE to volunteer who takes your card and replaces it with the same "brand" from some other sender). Changing the bar code to a single number everyone uses is way better and much simpler.

      • Of course, how long before the cease and desist letter was mailed?

      Host in China or Tuvalu or something like that. Couldn't be very pricey - just instructions for printing a bar code onto a label with pre-fab b&W jpeg.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    52. Re:Read this carefully by anagama · · Score: 1

      That's the point of switching cards - then the purchases look like they track to a single person but in fact, track to someone else. In this way, the data is poisoned because a supermarket assumes the data belongs to one person, not a series of random people.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    53. Re:Read this carefully by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      maybe not the credit card companies, but if you use a check card that functions as a debit card rather than a true visa (even if it doesnt say, check with your bank), then you had better believe that they are tracking it all.

      --
      Bottles.
    54. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They collect the data simply for "data mining" purposes. Now that technology has made it possible to retain vast quantities of data (and not just summaries,) retailers are amassing HUGE databases of customer purchasing information. Walmart reportedly has 50 petabytes of sales history saved.

      Most of data mining today answers the mundane questions like "how much more ice cream do people buy when it's hot?" What they're going for is more esoteric links and trends. Things like: if anagama buys lingerie, then buys an EPT test a month later, perhaps they can forecast the demand for EPT tests based on lingerie sales. Or maybe they'll put anagama on a list so that in 9 months they send you coupons for diapers and formula. (BTW, diapers and formula are the holy grail of retail: if they can get new moms to regularly shop at their store for those two items, they believe they have a customer for life. New moms typically harbor good feelings about the places they trust to help provide for their children.)

      Data mining is still a very immature process, despite current marketing hype. So far, it's being used experimentally. Walmart is certainly the king of data mining, but even their latest and greatest example was simply to see what people bought before and after hurricane Charley. (Turns out they sold 7 times the usual number of strawberry pop-tarts and beer, so they shipped trucks with extra poptarts and beer to the stores in the projected paths of the rest of the other hurricanes this season.) Again, nothing that couldn't have been done with raw statistics.

      Retailers view this data as "gold ore", even though it's a lot more like the Emperor's New Clothes. It's got to be valuable, somehow, it's just that we haven't figured out how to process it yet. The people working on the "customer database" teams are quick to shout "yes, it's valuable" because if they didn't they'd be out of a job. Same with the Sun and Oracle salesmen -- buy this valuable database processing engine and mine for gold (or else I get no fat bonus check, boo-hoo.)

      Yes, I am a deeply placed insider who works for a large retailer. I see this stuff all the time, and I know how worthless it's been so far. But it doesn't stop us from trying to mine more data. And it certainly doesn't stop us from collecting it. So go ahead and poison the database it if you want, but there are three reasons why I personally wouldn't bother: first, the number of poisoners is statistically insignificant (good luck changing that). Second, as I mentioned above, the databases are not yielding the gold you might imagine. Finally, I try not to participate in those card gimmicks -- I shop at stores that don't require them.

    55. Re:Read this carefully by anagama · · Score: 1


      My present Haggen Card collection is:

      4 01700 62701 4

      4 01800 02927 5

      Free for anyone to use.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    56. Re:Read this carefully by anagama · · Score: 1

      AC post burried - best part (barcode generator)

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    57. Re:Read this carefully by omeomi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I currently have six original mp3s and 3 mpegs for free on my website (link above). I ask nothing in return. Some things are free. As to whether or not these files have any actual value is of course up for debate, but the oft-stated claim that nothing is free is an obvious falacy. Open-source software is free. Unwanted stuff left on the curb is free. I have a juicer that was in the garage when I bought my house, and I've never even considered using it. Anyone who wants it (provided they know where I live, and don't mind stopping by to pick it up) is welcome to it. That's also free.

    58. Re:Read this carefully by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Of course, how long before the cease and desist letter was mailed?

      Mailed to where, exactly?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    59. Re:Read this carefully by FashionNugget · · Score: 1

      >>Why are these companies always portrayed in a negative light with the assumption that they are bad?

      because it's a little hard to portray them in a negative light if you assume that they are good.

    60. Re:Read this carefully by cowens · · Score: 1

      You forget there are other uses for condoms than the intended one.

    61. Re:Read this carefully by iamacat · · Score: 1

      You sure picked a weird target. I have never been harassed by Safeway with whatever information they are gathering from my club card. They just mention some items on sale at the bottom of the receipt. If you trade cards, you just get diaper advertisements instead of ones for your favourite beer until they catch up with "your" new buying habits.

      Not that they are angels or anything - probably sucks to work there - but they are trying to make more money selling groceries, not selling your personal information to nigerian spammers. Niether they want their competitors to buy their hard-collected statistics from a third party, so they would rather not sell it in the first place.

      There is a lot of value of having purchase information matched to a particular buyer beyond spam and junk paper mail. If people who buy X are likely to also buy Y, it makes sense to put them close on the shelf, preferably highest-profit-margin version of Y closest to X. If majority of frequnt shoppers in a particular Safeway are senior, it makes sense to have a bigger pharmacy and smaller fast food section.

      It would be nice to swap e-mail addresses that you use to fill in web forms - except that spammers care far more about volume than targetting. It seams like lots of people are not satisfied with their bodies and are willing to buy dubious creams and pills to rectify the problem. Beyond that, it would be nice to have a list of credit cards that don't harass you with "pay $70 every year of a service you will seldom remember to use" programs. And a list of online stores that don't subscribe you to any newsletters by default and don't sell information to anyone else if you choose to subscribe.

    62. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been done, with great success. Try google.

    63. Re:Read this carefully by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll send you an iPod for $1. All you need to do is to send me the $1 bill, then ask 50 of your friends to send me $1 each, then tell 50 of THEIR friends to send me $1 each. In addition, every one of your 50 friends can also get an iPod for $1, as long as every one of their 50 friends send me $1.

      Sure, from the first person you would actually get 1+50+50*50=$2551, but on the last part you would lose... Since you would only get $51 from them, sure you would have some money left after the first round but if all the people wanted an ipod you would get $2551+50*$51=$5101 for 51 ipods.

      But it wouldn't matter since they wouldn't (or even had) get 50 friends to sign up, but anyway! :D

      What a waste of storage and bandwidth this message was.

    64. Re:Read this carefully by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Quoted out of context - he said "Nothing is free, except true charity".

      Free (as in beer) software is charity. It takes time and effort to create, yet is offered for zero monetary cost (and often without any other strings attached, at least for use) - that's charity.

    65. Re:Read this carefully by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Nothing is free

      Thank you.

      PS: My sig has been implying this for a while. :-)

    66. Re:Read this carefully by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      Nothing is free

      Right, not even death: It still costs your life.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    67. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try using the juicer. Someone gave me one a while ago. I only use it for fruit -- none of that wheatgrass or carrots or cabbage, thanks -- but my health has noticeably improved since.

    68. Re:Read this carefully by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      If the 'coupon cards' are things you scan to take advantage of any running promotions, then I prefer the way the Dutch supermarket Albert Heijn does it. When I asked about the card, they asked me if I would want it personalized or anonymous. I said anonymous. She drew a little X at the bottom of the long form, and gave me a card.

      The idea being that they can still track what I buy, without them knowing my personal information, I suppose, and I'm okay with that.

    69. Re:Read this carefully by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      How anti-capitalistic you are.

      If you want to buy something the incentive is then to get a job and save earned money. ;-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    70. Re:Read this carefully by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i don't get it.

      my spare time is free.
      i don't pay myself for my spare time, my employer doesn't pay me for my spare time. and i definitely don't want to spend the whole day earning money because in that case the following question arizes:

      what is all the money good for if i don't have any spare time to spend it?

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    71. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what Carly needs.

      A good fuck to loosen her up. Nothing sexier than an authority figure getting down and dirty. Hell, maybe a whole week of it to let her racked brain adjust to the good life. :)

    72. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      faking the barcode you might be breaching an agreement you have with them

      What agreement? I just grabbed my CVS card off a stack at the registers and started using it. Never filled out any info, never will.

    73. Re:Read this carefully by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this scene from the Simpsons.

      Homer trying to casually buy illegal fireworks: Let me have one of those porno magazines... large box of condoms... a bottle of Old Harper... a couple of those panty shields... and some illegal fireworks, and one of those disposable enemas. Eh, make it two.
      Later...
      Marge seeing Homer's purchases: I don't know what you've got planned for tonight, Homer, but count me out.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    74. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said anonymous. She drew a little X at the bottom of the long form, and gave me a card.

      The idea being that they can still track what I buy, without them knowing my personal information


      Cue the tinfoil-het-brigade, who'll say that they'll crossreference your credit/debit card withthe coupon card, and know all your info anyway.

    75. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TANSTAAFL: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch... or these drinks wouldn't cost half as much.

    76. Re:Read this carefully by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Well, I personally have a job but the prospect of saving up $250+ for a gadget I could otherwise get for free. Call me a communist, but I prefer "free" over "paid for"

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    77. Re:Read this carefully by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Actually, personal information is useful to them in terms of selecting which coupon offers to make. If you always purchase generic, sandpaper-grade toilet paper, they might offer you a coupon for a pricier option. If, on the other hand, you already buy the premium brand, there's no reason for them to offer you a coupon on it, is there?

      Personally, the only thing that bothers me about those cards is having a different one for each store. I'd happily register my credit and debit cards with them and let them just use that to tag my purchases individually...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    78. Re:Read this carefully by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Which one will you use when you want to build your new girl robot?

    79. Re:Read this carefully by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um you're still paying for it. Don't you get it? Advertising and promotions are part of the cost of crap we buy.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    80. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is commonly accepted that for every dollar you spend on a cola drink, 90 cents go to advertisement

    81. Re:Read this carefully by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      An old saying -- Money ain't the only thing that has value.

      Everything has an opportunity cost. If you spend your time watching a movie, you have to give up reading a book during that timeslot. Building your own myth tv box means that you won't be able to watch that movie. Since time is a "fixed income", you will always be giving up something to do something else. So, as long as what you're giving up (i.e., laying around watchin infomercials) is less valuable than what you'd get out of doing a particular project (i.e., designing your own pvr), then that is a good tradeoff.

      Simple formula, really.

    82. Re:Read this carefully by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Maybe that explains my extreme lust for Hillary.

      Why else do you think I want her to run for President in 2008? Imagine all the Hillary porn that would surface.

      I would give each of you a free iPod for a week with Hillary. (Just to stay on topic.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    83. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Something like this has been done by Rob Cockerham of Cockeyed.com. Rob, by the way, is the funniest person on the internet. Bar Strongbad, of course.

    84. Re:Read this carefully by elmegil · · Score: 1

      No, when I say credit card companies I mean credit card companies. I have direct experience with one, and whatever they can get about your records is mined from here to wholaidit. Perhaps they have anaonymized it by that point, but the data is definitely out there, and they definitely look through it thoroughly.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    85. Re:Read this carefully by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Whenever a /. article is posted about some nifty little DIY project that can save you from spending a few hundred dollars on a consumer model or whatever, the value of one's time always comes into question. How much money are you saving if the project takes X hours of your time?

      Wow dude. Do you really measure the moments of your life in dollars? That's sad.

    86. Re:Read this carefully by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I think some of these companies are not that soulless. They are upfront with what they want. They want your personal information, they want you to subscribe to some service (which you can unsubscribe) and they want your friends to join and they subscribe (and thusly unsubscribe) also. It is straight forward, though cumbersome. So now you have to ask yourself - is a $300-$500 gadget worth the time and effort you are putting into it plus the fact that a couple of companies are going to get your data (e-mail is not a problem since you probably have a dummy e-mail account for such sites, but they are smart, they get your address and credit card).

      I leave the term "soulless corporation" for those who use more underhanded tricks - like spyware firms, or a company you bought a product from and then they go and sell your data w/o your knowledge by some terrible agreement buried in a link that appears AFTER you complete the purchase which states in subparagraph 3.5.32.1.3.2 that they will only sell your data to "affiliates & subsidiaries" which means anyone they freaking want to. :)

      The end.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    87. Re:Read this carefully by pclminion · · Score: 1
      That's why I trade supermarket "coupon" cards whenever I get a chance. It is better than avoiding the cards because trading has the potential to poison the data collection. If I simply refuse, they have a valid data set on those who use the cards (most people). But poisoned data can be dangerous if used as the basis for financial decisions. I'd love it if people made card trading a regular process.

      The card is optional. Basically, what you are doing is pissing all over somebody else's campfire. Don't try to spin this into some kind of noble effort.

      And don't give me any lip about "improving customer service by stocking the right items"

      As you point out, that's not why they do it. Yes, there are customer-targetted reasons behind these cards. The main reason is for optimizing coupon mailings. Tell me, do you not want coupons? You like turning down discounts? Tell me another thing, do you not want coupons which are actually relevant to the kinds of items you buy?

      The other reason for these cards, which might not be immediately clear to you, is to optimize the placement of items on store shelves. They can do this without tracking you personally, by just assigning you an anonymous numbered account. Albertson's, for example, gives you the option of having an anonymous account.

      Think, why would these companies offer anonymous discount cards if their only purpose was to track your personal buying habits? There are other factors at work here. It doesn't seem like you've actually thought out your reasons for objecting to these things, and on top of that you are acting to intentionally damage the system for other people, when you have the option of simply not participating. I think that's really immature.

    88. Re:Read this carefully by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I like my supermarket cards. I know their address information is wrong (like four addresses ago) - and in a way I would like to get the coupons (hey my mom gets free turkeys every year... like 3-5 of them)....I get nice discounts (on average 10%, but I have gotten as high as 45% once) with those cards. Everything has a price - if to save a buck I have to get some extra mail - well my recycling bin just gets bigger. And who knows - sometimes those spam letters are useful (if I get a credit card offer for 0% for the next two years, I look at it). I just hate the unsoliticited spam that comes in droves. One of my e-mail boxes gets a few hundred a day sometimes three to four e-mails from the same place at the same time. (On a side note I haven't sent a message from it in at least three years - I just keep it in case an old old old friend contacts me through there).

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    89. Re:Read this carefully by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      A stocking stuffer would have implied it was a gift - (an expensive stuffer, but hey) - this thing cost you - not money but time and information (and your friends' time and information).

      I went through the process to help a friend out. Signed up and did what was needed so he got his credit. After that unsubscribe and told the companies to remove me from their lists on pain of litigation :D

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    90. Re:Read this carefully by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Put them over your head, so they just cover your nose. Hold your ears real tight - blow hard until it becomes huge (yes you can tell girls you need a huge condom too) and watch it pop?

      Fill it with sour cream and everyone at the bar can get sprayed with your cream filled condom fun too!!!!

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    91. Re:Read this carefully by bushboy · · Score: 1

      The simple answer is they aren't always portrayed in that light, you are just asuming that slashdot readers are the majority.

      --
      A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    92. Re:Read this carefully by Christopher+Cashell · · Score: 1

      Another thing that people should read carefully is the privacy statement these guys post. There's some interesting stuff in there:

      To create an account, we collect your name, email address, and a shipping address. You will also create a password that you may change in the Account page of our site. We use this information to set up your account, to send you a registration confirmation email and to log your shipping information so that we know where to send your order. We may also use your email address to send you information about new services, features, and special offers from us. Members may opt-out of receiving future mailings of this nature by following the relevant instructions articulated in the body of these promotional emails.

      Translation: You give us your information. We then sell it to everyone who will pay us for it, and if you want to opt out of it, you'll have to opt out separately for every single one of the hundreds, if not thousands, of companies we sell you to.

      We may work with other third party businesses using the personal information that you supply to us on the main signup page to bring selected retail opportunities to our members via direct mail, email and telemarketing. These businesses may include providers of direct marketing services and applications, including lookup and reference, data enhancement, suppression and validation and email marketing.

      Translation: We will sell your information to known spammers, provided they pay us for it. We'll also sell it to telemarketers, junk mailers, and data whores who collect this kind of thing so they can resell it.

      There is no way to deactivate an account; if you no longer wish to remain a part of a Gratis Internet website, simply stop logging in to your account. Gratis Internet will not share your information.

      Translation: Be prepared for a lifetime of spam at a level well above what you're currently experiencing. And since we have it in the fine print, you can't stop us. Heck, we'll keep selling your information to spammers even after you're dead!

      If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will post those changes to this privacy statement, the homepage, and other places we deem appropriate so that you are aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it.

      We reserve the right to modify this privacy statement at any time, so please review it frequently. If we make material changes to this policy, we will notify you here, by email, or by means of a notice on our web page.


      Translation: We'll change our privacy statement whenever we feel like it, and we're not going to tell you about it. And since you can't delete, remove, or even deactivate an account, that means that we can pretty much do anything we want with your information and you'll probably never know about it. Doesn't that sound like fun?

      --
      Topher
    93. Re:Read this carefully by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Hrm, I don't use coupons. Instead I decide what I wish to purchase based on price for value received. Price too high? No purchase. Certainly I may miss out on a few bux here and there but I also don't have to track the silly coupons, cut them out, or worry that I've picked up the "right" product for a specific coupon. I'll pay the extra and save the headache thanks.

      As to putting things close by on shelves using this tracking - why exactly do they need a coupon card for this? They pull the sales records from the registers to stock shelves, surely they must know that two items were sold on the same ticket without having to know WHO made the purchase right? This argument makes no sense to me. I'll gladly "poison" their system and I do it already. When the cashier askes me for my card I tell them I have none and either the person bhind me uses their's or the a cashier uses the one they have at hand - otherwise no sale!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    94. Re:Read this carefully by pclminion · · Score: 1
      As to putting things close by on shelves using this tracking - why exactly do they need a coupon card for this? They pull the sales records from the registers to stock shelves, surely they must know that two items were sold on the same ticket without having to know WHO made the purchase right?

      It's more complicated than that. Yes, they could work directly from the information on the receipts, but that still doesn't let them track buying behaviors across multiple visits to the store. Let me give a contrived example.

      Suppose a particular customer (their identity is not important, to either the store or this discussion) has a habit of purchasing a lot of beer on Friday night. This customer also has a habit of coming in the next day to buy Tylenol (to cure the hangover). Clearly, there is some kind of relationship between beer and Tylenol, but it could not have been discovered simply by looking at anonymized receipts. There needs to be a common link, or thread, among the purchases. This is done by assigning each customer an identifier.

      This can all be done anonymously, as I said.

      BTW, your "data poisoning" method is ineffectual. If you use the cashier's card, the transaction can be flagged since we know which cards are cashier cards. And if you use the card of the person behind you in line, then the record will show the same card used twice in a row on the same cash register and both transactions can be flagged.

    95. Re:Read this carefully by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1

      I just con my way into having the cashier run her card for me. I always fiegn forgetting it, and rattle off a few old phone numbers. I used to use my old phone number, but now someone else has it, and when I used it, I would get these ten% off coupons. I felt bad, like I was stealing from the other person or something, and stopped.

      --
      what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
    96. Re:Read this carefully by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Okay, I see where that data might be of interest to a retailer. However I still have issue with their profiling, in particular when it's tied to an individual. Certainly it can be done anonymously and yeah some do it but at a later date there's nothing stopping "someone" from tying you to the card. I have to giggle when I see some law enforcement shows on the tube using just such things when they find a suspect has such a card but really - how far is it from the truth? "Joe Schmoe" bought duct tape and rope the day before Suzy was murdered, we ran his card! Is this the world we wish to live in? How about a giant registeed DNA database, is that okay too? I just don't like where this all seems to be headed.

      As to data poisoning - I have never really taken an aggressive stance on this, my using other's cards wasn't an overt attempt at it but simply what occurs because I avoid these cards. Now that I've realized that it might be possible, if even in some small way, to screw with these I might start being more active. :-) If enough people do it then perhaps they will go away....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    97. Re:Read this carefully by pclminion · · Score: 1
      "Joe Schmoe" bought duct tape and rope the day before Suzy was murdered, we ran his card! Is this the world we wish to live in?

      I'm not sure I see your point. That we should not be able to carry out criminal investigations? Certainly it would take more evidence to convict somebody of murder than the simple fact that he bought certain items on a certain day, especially if he has no social connections to the victim. The police already have ways of obtaining this kind of information anyway (just walk into the shop and ask the owner who bought something on a certain day).

      If somebody were ever actually indicted, tried, and convicted of murder just because he bought some rope and duct tape, I'd say the problem lies in the justice system, not the particular technology used to conduct the investigation.

    98. Re:Read this carefully by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Finally, I try not to participate in those card gimmicks -- I shop at stores that don't require them.

      A-fucking-men! Stop wasting your time masturbating by trying to "poision" the database and support with your wallet those retailers that choose to value your privacy!

      FYI: No Thriftway supermarkets use nazi cards (at least in the Seattle area).

    99. Re:Read this carefully by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Agreed that this wouldn't end up the sole evidence but it's a view into my purchases that I prefer didn't exist. It's an invasion of sorts that I and others do not appreciate. It gives the merchant insight and for little compensation or advantage to the consumer. Don't even get me started on RFID :-(

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    100. Re:Read this carefully by Everleet · · Score: 1

      Your sig would be easier as: fortune -m'All wars are civil wars'

      --
      It's tragic. Laugh.
    101. Re:Read this carefully by eofpi · · Score: 1

      There's one thing I always wonder about these things...what's to stop me from giving them n+1 different sets of randomly generated identity and demographic info, where n is the number of friends you need to rope into this to get your free ipod? Use a civilized browser, clean out the relevant cookies in between sessions, and use a different IP each time, and what's to stop me (aside from a personal sense of ethics and the fact that i don't particularly want an ipod)?

      --
      Y'know, you blow up one sun and suddenly everyone expects you to walk on water.
    102. Re:Read this carefully by polyiguana · · Score: 1

      Changing the bar code to a single number everyone uses is way better and much simpler.

      Uh, it's been done already.

    103. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use all the supermarket cards, under fake names and addresses. If they want to track Nunya Bizniz, they can be my guest.

    104. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing with that site is that the guy who created it gives out HIS card, so now he's benefiting by racking up various points, etc. It'd be great to have a site with more than just Safeway cards -- one that offers bar codes for multiple card programs and that rotates member numbers around.

    105. Re:Read this carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this site it for real> www.freeiPods.com >> http://www.freeipods.com/?r=13116055> heres an artilce about it in wired & geek.com>>> http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,64614,00.html http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2004Aug/gee20040 819026544.htm use my referal link too;-) >> http://www.freeipods.com/?r=13116055

    106. Re:Read this carefully by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I want you all to read this very carefully: Nothing is free

      Apparently sometimes iPods are free... Wired ran a similar story in august and the author really seemed to think the "scheme" was legit. According to the Wired.Com story, Gratis's privacy policy is pretty air tight, and I personally haven't recieved any spam as a result of signing up.

      That said, if anyone wants to help me get one, and a gmail invite for yourself in the process...

  2. It works... by Jarwulf · · Score: 0, Troll

    They even showed it on techtv and I know several people who got their's... Shameless plug Now if anyone wants to refer me I'll give them 7 bucks through paypal!

    1. Re:It works... by Jarwulf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Forgot, here's my link http://www.freeiPods.com/?r=9026044

    2. Re:It works... by user9918277462 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Pyramid schemes (going all the way back to Ponzi) were based around the fact that the first participants seemed to recieve whatever was promised (a quick profit, "free" goods, etc). This was the bait used to lure in the next generation of suckers.

      Know what "exponential growth" means? ;)

    3. Re:It works... by Jarwulf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, if they get too many requests then I guess they'll shut it down. The company has been thoroughly checked out and I don't use my personal information anyways. Many people I know HAVE gotten ipods through this offer. Whether or not people here can believe it does not change the fact

    4. Re:It works... by user9918277462 · · Score: 3, Informative
      What you're betting on is that you will be among the small percentage of people on the top who get the reward before the scheme exhausts the pool of potential targets.

      Basically you're hoping to screw five suckers who will probably never get a free iPod (or whatever) before the whole idiotic mess collapses. Not very nice.

    5. Re:It works... by AtillaTheKilla · · Score: 1

      The difference being, of course, that your not really losing money here, if the company making the offers up and vanishes. It seems you would only lose your opportunity to get your free merchandise, and your anonymity, if you don't play your cards right. This may be due to the fact that, in addition to the Ponzi scheme part of the deal, there is a semi-legit peddling of information gathered from referals.

    6. Re:It works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a math formula (which I can't remember) that you can use for any given pyramid scheme. The people who get in the earliest end up making all the gains. Eventually, the potential market is saturated, interest dies out, and the peopole who got in late end up "paying" for the earlier peoples cool stuff while getting nothing for themselves.

      The mechanism works the same as supermarket discount cards. All those club member savings come from somewhere. They come from me. I implicitly pay for part of other people's groceries just because I don't want to sell my identity. Just like pyramid schemes, eventually everyone else will have the card, and they'll have to artificially inflate prices to give the illusion of savings. Once it's said and done, all the legitimate savings stop happening because everyone has the card and there's no one left to exploit. I suppose you could argue that reading ads from the mail makes money for them, so I guess that might count as a legitimate source of savings on your card.

      But either way, those who got in early saved the most since the savings die out eventually. Somewhere along the way we all will have managed to trick ourselves into selling our identity for savings we aren't even making anymore.

  3. Christmas spirit by saskboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems common sense [to me anyway] that to get a "free" iPod from some company or person that is giving one away, they stand to gain something in return. Since I don't know precisely what they are gaining, since it isn't money from me, and I have to assume they aren't doing it in the Christmas Spirit and giving for the sheer joy of it, then it only stands to reason that they are going to loot me in some way.

    Some people might not mind having their personal browsing or comsumer habits monitored at every turn or click, but I'd rather keep some anonymity. Especially from companies which are quite obviously associated with spamming, and pyramid scheming.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Christmas spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me a cynic, but around this time of year, you see a *lot* of "Mega Sale" type stuff where retailers are falling over themselves telling you what bargains you can get. Here is where the cynic in me rears it pretty face, would any of these retailers sell these things at a loss or even at cost? Something tells me no, they are most certainly not going to sell perfectly good stuff even at just cost, so with these 50%-75% X-mas sale deals around at the moment, these retailers are *still* making a profit.

      Here is the thing - people seem totally oblivious to the fact that the rest of the year they are ripped off to the tune of 100%-150% markup on the items they buy. Even when this is pointed out to them, they are still harping on about what great deals they are making in the sales.

      Are people really as stupid as they appear?

    2. Re:Christmas spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the thing is its hard to go upstream of the stores layer unless you are buying in extreme volume

      and the discount stores just don't tend to have the range

      im not convinced the markups are that high on all products (maybe on unbranded imports but i doubt it on big brand things like lego)

      at least that seems to be the way it is here in the uk

    3. Re:Christmas spirit by brokencomputer · · Score: 1

      "The lesson is that the only thing on this earth that is truly free is your mother's love. Everything else has a string or catch attached." ummm... What about free software? More importantly, iPod Linux: http://www.ipodlinux.org/

    4. Re:Christmas spirit by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      They're getting money from AOL and the credit card companies and whoever else they have deals with. If those companies are really paying the $30 or $40 per signup that the article mentions I'm not sure, but I don't see how it can go on much longer. AOL will realize that 95% of the referrals they're getting from Gratis are cancelling as soon as they can, and they'll figure out that there are better ways for them to spend that $30.00.

      Upon which Gratis will regretfully announce that since AOL is no longer fulfilling their part of the deal, they can no longer send out any more free iPods. Thanks for giving us your Email address, though. Oh, and thanks for getting all your friends and family to sign up. Hope they don't blame you for all this.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    5. Re:Christmas spirit by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      A good deal is a relative term. A good deal is when they get something for less then they normally pay.

      Now if you can tell me how to get "at cost" or "at a loss" deals all year round without buying in bulk, then I'd be happy to admit people are getting a bad deal. But if you can't they're getting a good deal COMPARED to what they can normally get.

      I'll let you in on a secret. All the major stores charge the same. And around here only the major stores exist.

    6. Re:Christmas spirit by adeydas · · Score: 1

      so are you suggesting that the iPod givers would spam you. while this is probably the most feasible explanation, how they would go about it still beats me.

    7. Re:Christmas spirit by Sein · · Score: 1

      Mmm, you're forgetting warehousing costs, storage, inventory, breakage, rent for the store, shipping costs, and a whole host of other expenses associated with running any business. The usual retail profit margin is around 3-5% on that 150% markup on account of these costs - you can quite easily go bankrupt if you only operate on a 100% markup.

      What's considered acceptable profit margins vary a lot from industry to industry of course - Microsoft with their 80% profit margin and the drug companies with their 18%-24%(ish) profit margin are quite different from your neighbourhood grocery store with a 4% profit margin.

      It depends partly on volume - if your turnover is 50K items a day you can have a much lower margin per sold item and still wind up with an acceptable living - if you sell 3-4 stereos a week you damn well better have a solid markup on each just to keep the store open in the slow season. Typical gift-type retailers (ex. toy stores, flatware) make most of their 'profits for the year during the run-up to Christmas, and to make sure they don't miss out they typically stock up a lot - something that requires you to tie up a lot of capital in stuff sitting in the back room. Cutting that "Stay-in-business"-margin during the post-holiday season to make sure you get whatever money is available in the market at a lower price point for the post-holiday season makes good business sense - you need to get your capital back out of the stock that didn't sell out before christmas, and make room for the next season.

      It's not getting ripped off though - either before or during the sale. But it's also why you're never going to see significant MegaSales prices before Christmas - retailers are banking on you and your friends/family buying gifts before Christmas, and stocking up on personal stuff on the sale afterwards.

    8. Re:Christmas spirit by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      it's assumed that at some point a linux geek will provide something in return to the community - so you will pay one way or another - even if it is something like posting in google "here is the solution to this problem."

      And even your mother's love isn't free - just wait until she is 85 and you are taking care of her...now while you are doing it because you love her (hopefully) it is still a form of repayment.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  4. Where this thread is going: by AtillaTheKilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can easily see this thread degenerating in to hundreds of 'rational' slahdotters begging for refs. We'll see...

    1. Re:Where this thread is going: by xlv · · Score: 0, Troll

      I totally agree with the parent poster, there's no way people would get as low as to post messages to this thread begging for references.

    2. Re:Where this thread is going: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pls die thx

    3. Re:Where this thread is going: by wfrost · · Score: 1

      "Oh please, please, please use my link: http://www.freeipods.com/?r=10879128"

      Slashdotters would never do that. Well, I'd never do that. Well...

      Oh well.

  5. while we're at it... by confusion · · Score: 5, Funny
    If you send this email to 10 of your friends, Bill Gates will send you $100. Er send you to Disney world, or refinance your mortgage or something.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

    1. Re:while we're at it... by Saeger · · Score: 4, Funny

      The amount of money Bill Gates was giving away was actually $1000, not a piddly $100 cnote. You obviously never got paid and are just jealous of the millions who did.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:while we're at it... by confusion · · Score: 1
      Wow... apparently so. Bastard!

      Jerry
      http://www.syslog.org/

    3. Re:while we're at it... by TheAJofOZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't worry there's a hard limit to how long this can last. Lets say it takes 1 month to get the 5 referrals you seem to need (I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to account for people taking longer, dropping out etc):
      Start: 1 person.
      1 Month: 5 new (6 total)
      2 Months: 25 new (31 total)
      3 Months: 125 new (156 total)
      4 Months: 625 new (781 total)
      5 Months: 3125 new (3906 total)
      6 Months: 15625 new (19531 total)
      7 Months: 78125 new (97656 total)
      8 Months: 390625 new (488281 total)
      9 Months: 1953125 new (2441406 total)
      10 Months: 9765625 new (12207031 total)
      11 Months: 48828125 new (61035156 total)
      12 Months: 244140625 new (305175781 total)
      13 Months: 1220703125 new (1525878906 total)
      14 Months: 6103515625 new (7629394531 total)

      Since there are only 6,446,131,400 people in the world the scheme cannot continue longer than 14 months. Sadly, those last few months will suck big time (and a few months after because of people who can't do basic math).

    4. Re:while we're at it... by Lovepump · · Score: 1

      Surely the next line:

      15 months: Profit.

      OK, I'll get my coat.

    5. Re:while we're at it... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      someone please mod parent up. a less-than-competent friend of mine tried to get me on his ipod scam list but when i tried to explain to him some of the mathematics behind pyramid schemes, he just denied it. sigh.

    6. Re:while we're at it... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I don't dispute your explanation, just the conclusion. Those people who can't do math will continue, encouraging others to try again (hey, if he's still doing it, maybe it still works!). Those people will in turn encourage others... and somehow this becomes self-sustaining.

      Truly, if this logic held, we would have been done with pyramid schemes in the early 20th century.

    7. Re:while we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh*

      What he's saying is that if everyone really did sign up 5 people, there's a hard limit. Obviously, people don't always sign up another 5 people, or this thing would be finished already.

    8. Re:while we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? Fucking mods on crack again. Why does treating Real Life like a grade nine math question get you mod points?

      Obviously not everyone is going to try to get in the pyramid, or be successful. If just 5 new per month roll in, then it can continue for over a billion months.

      So, it will last from 14 months to billions of months.

      Asshat.

    9. Re:while we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...you're assuming that the other 5 people that you need to sign up to get your free ipod will do so out of sheer charity. This is a nonsense. The only reason someone would sign up for this is by realizing that yes, he can get a free ipod if he signs up only 5 other people. The fact that that person is fullfilling someone elses quota is irrelevant. Hence, the parent's argument is correct and an explanation of why pyramid schemes don't work. The fact that you're trying to refute is a clear indication why new pyramid schemes continue to be reinvented and be successfull for a short period of time.

    10. Re:while we're at it... by pranay · · Score: 1

      You must not forget that all 6 billion people do not have access to a computer (only about 10%), not everyone knows what an ipod is, and out of those who understand ipods (and mp3), not everyone wants one. If your logic is true, this should end somewhere around 11 months at best.

    11. Re:while we're at it... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Since you don't really *pay* any money to use the system, it's not much different from a rewards system (your employer probably has a $250 bonus, or something, for new hires you refer). If you know four people who'll do this with you, you *will* get a free iPod, and if they each know four people, exclusively, who'll join in, *they'll* get free iPods too. Yes, eventually there'll be a bunch of people without iPods, but since they are only out a few minutes of time and some (miniscule?) privacy loss, they probably won't really care (something along the lines of "damn, I thought I'd get a free iPod, oh well...").

      That said, I don't expect ever to buy into this free iPod (or free whatever) scheme. It's a bit too shady. But for those who wish to play the game, the standard "pyramid scheme" argument isn't really a valid reason not to. It's not like you do this by paying $5 to six people (or whatever), in the hopes of getting money from each person below you on the list, turning $30 into $20mil.

    12. Re:while we're at it... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      This doesn't really fit the pyramid scheme flaw. With a pyramid scheme, you *need* everyone in the world to buy in just to make some pittance, but with this scheme, you only need four friends to sign in (for zero dollar cost) to get 1 free iPod, and then you're done.

      Most ISP's will give you a free month, or a $5-$20 credit, for signing up new friends, etc. The pattern here is similar. It can't hold up forever, but then, you don't really need it to.

      There are certainly reasons not to play the game, but the ponzi/pyramid scheme argument isn't one of them.

    13. Re:while we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright little monkey, let my rebuttal begin:

      If just 5 new per month roll in, then it can continue for over a billion months.
      It won't be 5 new people per month. It will be 5 new people per user.

      So, it will last from 14 months to billions of months.
      Please leave and never come back.
      I'm kidding.
      No I'm not.
      Yes I am.
      No, I'm not kidding. I'm not your Joker.

    14. Re:while we're at it... by hippycow · · Score: 0

      All I can say is I hope you wrote a little script to generate that list instead of typing it all in by hand.

    15. Re:while we're at it... by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      Since there are only 6,446,131,400 people in the world the scheme cannot continue longer than 14 months.

      Actually, the situation is not quite as simple as your mathematical reduction of it suggests. For one, each person may want more than 1 ipod, so there is no absolute limit on the number wanting to participate. Secondly, there is no clear rule about signing up for the required services, cancelling, and signing up again. Thus there is no mathematical limit on the required currency.

      To have a hard limit they really should've specified that the people you want to sign up must never have already signed up for the same service from the same company in the past. Otherwise the only real limit is when the value of the referent to the company is reduced to the point where the number of required referents to merit an ipod is excessive, and either no one feels it's worthwhile to participate anymore, or companies find the administrative costs for managing the few who do exceed the value.

    16. Re:while we're at it... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Truly, if this logic held, we would have been done with pyramid schemes in the early 20th century.

      Dude--pyramid schemes regularly collapse. Unfortunately, people keep starting new ones. The guys who start the schemes usually make money. The people at the bottom of the pyramid get left holding the bag.

      This year's pyramid schemes are different from last year's pyramid schemes, precisely because last year's are no longer sustainable.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    17. Re:while we're at it... by LtOcelot · · Score: 1

      The defining characteristic of a pyramid scheme is pyramid structure, not the use of dollars to pay into it. Consider this a "barter pyramid".

  6. Question by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you wonder what all those free iPods links are about?

    No, not really.

    1. Re:Question by Saeger · · Score: 1

      Do you ever wonder how desperately materialistic someone has to be to shamelessly whore themselves out like that?

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanting a free ipod doesn make you a bad person.

    3. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, but selling out 5 of your friends to get it does.

    4. Re:Question by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I think the last time i ever wondered about anything like this was when I got an email saying that one of my friends had acquired x number of shares in a company simply by giving them my email address, and that I could do the same. Given that nothing is free, I concluded that my email address must be of value to them, and that I would now be getting more junk email.

      That was some time between 94 and 97, and I haven't really wondered about it since, except to wonder if the spammers will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    5. Re:Question by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Marketing Guy: I smell free iPod!

      Chris Elliot: Really??!!

      Marketing Guy: No ... NOT REALLY!

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Question by loucura! · · Score: 1

      What if you sell out five people you don't know?

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
  7. Read this carefully-For Sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Individually, it means very little, but when you sell out your friends to get in on this scheme..."

    "(http://prometheus.me...b/pubx_pubx_bwj.html)"

    Hmmm...

  8. I will remember to mod down those suckers by Zangief · · Score: 0, Troll

    When I see them.

    From now on , a sig with "Free xxx" == -1 Troll.

    1. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by BossMC · · Score: 0

      >a sig with "Free xxx" == -1 Troll.

      PFFFFT, what!? Free XXX? I think you meant free "foo".

    2. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by MXK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Say what you want, but Free XXX is always good. Unless you're... well, you know...

    3. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a sig you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by kesuki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just for you I have a new sig!

    5. Re:I will remember to mod down those suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... Mormon?

  9. old news by esmoothie · · Score: 5, Informative

    freeipods.com has been talked about before. There was even an article on wired about it a while back; http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,64614,00.html From everything I have read, it seems legit as far as people getting their ipods.

    1. Re:old news by eecue · · Score: 1

      I got my ipod. Yes you have to get some of your friends to join. And yes you have to join a club of some sort... but it is not a scam. It too a few months to get my ipod though... here are some pics of it

      --
      -- sigs suck --
    2. Re:old news by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      dunno about america but over here you can't really advertise something as 'free' if it isn't(even their company name is engineered to make you think that you're not paying in any form any money to anyone to get the ipod).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:old news by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Yes, they're legit. So is my anti-spam provider. Why I would pay good money to have spam eliminated and then sign up with these guys to get a "free" iPod is beyond me.

      Yes, I know the hassle is "worth it" to some. I know others use fake email addresses, etc to get their iPod without the obligations they "agree" to. I find ignoring this kind of thing to be a much simpler solution. If your "friends" don't understand why you're ignoring thier pleas to join, you probably need a better class of friend.

      TW

    4. Re:old news by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      It's legit. It took the better part of 4 months, but they sent me an iPod

      Photo of me and my FREE iPod

    5. Re:old news by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      it didn't like my html: http://jeff.jeffornot.com/photos/ipod/pb200060.jpg

  10. Because it actually works... by eMartin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know several people who got free iPods by signing up for the offers involved and then cancelling. If they paid anything at all, it was certainly a lot less than the cost of the iPod.

    I guess if this company is making money, then not everyone bothers to get out of the offers they sign up for, but even they aren't getting ripped off.

    BTW, there have been a few sites that set up referal pools, where people basically just got together and refered each other with the people in the pool.

    1. Re:Because it actually works... by zoloto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It does work. You fill out offers from three companies and wait. In my case, two visa's and AOL. Once the iPod came AOL was cancelled (under the no billing time) and the visa's were cancelled. I used a P.O. Box from a company that would accept packages from ups and fedex (MBE). After I had gotten two iPods, the MBE account, AOL, temp hotmail address and Visa cards were cancelled.

      No junk mail at my house. No spam. Free iPods.

      I'm not complaining.

    2. Re:Because it actually works... by MeanSolutions · · Score: 1

      I'd advise people to read the fine-print in the deal if they are to try that. The firms doing these deals will not get stung for that all the time, so they are likely to amend the contracts so that if you cancel within a certain time, you have to send the "free" stuff back.

      If there was a way that companies could offer out cars, houses or other very expensive stuff as bait and still make very tidy profits, they would. The iPod bait is there because it appeals to youngsters that doesn't know better and don't give a rats arse about selling their mates details to these companies.

      --
      Swedish, but resident in the UK since 1996.
    3. Re:Because it actually works... by Saeger · · Score: 5, Funny
      After I had gotten two iPods, the MBE account, AOL, temp hotmail address and Visa cards were cancelled.

      Well, thanks for scamming the scammers, scammer. Hopefully "Gratis, Inc." will go out of business as fast as AllAdvantage did a few years ago. If anyone remembers them. :)

      "If anyone here is in marketing or advertising... KILL yourself. No joke here, really, seriously, kill yourself, you are no rationalization for what you do, you are Satan's little helpers. Kill yourself. Kill yourself. Kill yourself, now. Now! Back to the show! ... Seriously, I know all the marketing people are gonna be like, "There's gonna be a joke coming up!" There's no fucking joke: suck a tailpipe, hang yourself, borrow a pistol from an NRA buddy, do something to rid the world of your evil fucking presence. OK, back to the show. ... You know what bugs me though, that everyone here who's in marketing is now thinking the same thing: "Oh, cool, Bill's going for that Anti-Marketing dollar. That's a huge market!" Quit it! Don't turn everything into a dollar sign, please! ..."Oohh, the plea for sanity dollar. Huge! Huge market! Look at our research."
      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Because it actually works... by eMartin · · Score: 1

      This is advertising. The companies that you need to sign up with pay for it. The free iPods guys are getting their money either way, and the only reason they'd have to ask for the stuff back would be if those companies asked for theirs back.

      But that would be like Nokia asking for their money back for the TV ads they bought because people didn't buy or keep their N-Gages.

    5. Re:Because it actually works... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      It works for some people, yes. They sell their personal information (along with that of their families and friends) and get a free toy. But along down the road it ceases to work because everyone gullible enough to sign up for one of these has already done it and in the end most who sign up end up just giving away their personal information for free. It ends up suffering from the same problems that any pyramid scam suffers from.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    6. Re:Because it actually works... by qbwiz · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Unfortunately, you seem to need to get 5 other people to also complete the offer. Makes it somewhat harder.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    7. Re:Because it actually works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting free gifts when you go to look at time shares actually works too. So does etting paid to participate in marketing research studies actually works.

    8. Re:Because it actually works... by Igottapoop · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hey, at least attribute your quote.

      It's Bill Hicks. One of the greatest comedic minds of all time. Google him sometime ya bastards...

    9. Re:Because it actually works... by tsalem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If anyone here is in marketing or advertising... KILL yourself..." - from one of Bill Hicks' standup routines. (Thought the quote should be credited..)

    10. Re:Because it actually works... by Saeger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know it's Bill Hicks. I blockquoted the quote, but forgot to add the '--First Last' attribute. So sue me ya bastard. I think that's one his more wellknown quotes around here anyway...

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    11. Re:Because it actually works... by Saeger · · Score: 1
      "Screw everybody else! As long as I get mine before everything goes to shit!"

      Is that it?

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    12. Re:Because it actually works... by lsmeg · · Score: 5, Informative
      It does work. You fill out offers from three companies and wait. In my case, two visa's and AOL. Once the iPod came AOL was cancelled (under the no billing time) and the visa's were cancelled. I used a P.O. Box from a company that would accept packages from ups and fedex (MBE). After I had gotten two iPods, the MBE account, AOL, temp hotmail address and Visa cards were cancelled.

      Word of caution: be careful about signing up for credit cards and cancelling them. The number of credit cards you own and have ever owned make up a part of your credit rating. Two credit cards you sign up for and cancel probably aren't going to do much... But if you go to get a mortgage and you've had 20 different cards, it could raise some eyebrows.

      --
      It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
    13. Re:Because it actually works... by Lovepump · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need to get only 4 other people to sue you, and I get a free Ipod.

    14. Re:Because it actually works... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      They've recently changed the wording of their offer deals and the fine print of the offers. You now have to keep the offers for a certain amount of time or you don't get credit for it. It was only a matter of time.

    15. Re:Because it actually works... by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall some law in the US, that if you receive an item in the mail you become the legal owner, permanently, and no-one has any right to ask for it back.

      I believe this was done to counter scams where companies would send various unrequested items to people, including fine print that says you have to return it within X days if you don't want to pay, then later they'd send a bill.

      Might not apply to UPS, FedEx, etc though. Wish I could remember where I read this.

      --
      ~ Aero
    16. Re:Because it actually works... by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to myself, but I remembered where I saw it right after posting. Here's the text of the law.

      I saw it during the CueCat fiasco. Quick recap: the company was pissed that people were reverse-engineering the things, so they tried to claim that the ones they sent unsolicited in the mail were still their property, and hence, the recipients did not have rights to do as they pleased with the devices.

      Further thoughts: my original idea might have been wrong, since the company could have an argument that you requested the item. But who knows.

      The reply-to-self isn't for extra karma, so please don't mod this post up at all. Look, I even checked the 'no karma bonus' box.

      OKAY I'M DONE NOW.

      --
      ~ Aero
    17. Re:Because it actually works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signing up for and Cancelling 2 Visas is going to wreck havoc on your credit. Glad you got your free iPod, in 5 years when you go for a house, you will now get a higher mortgage rate, which will turn out to probably an extra $300-$500 per month in the extra rate costs.

      FREE IPODS YAY!!!!!!

    18. Re:Because it actually works... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see someone else who realizes this. These things will ding you at least twice, possibly 3 times. Once on the credit inquiry to determine if you GET the card (probably at a tax-like 30% interest), once on actually HAVING the card (lowering the average age of your accounts), and once on how fast you CLOSE the account (Not sure how the bureaus score this, if at all)

    19. Re:Because it actually works... by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      All hail Bill Hicks!

      (The speaker behind that quote)

      --

      Question everything

    20. Re:Because it actually works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but if you've got 20 low rate credit cards you don't need a mortgage; you can buy your house on your credit cards.

      While this may seem a bit bizarre, my ex, who makes about $21,000/year, has enough cards balances available to her to buy three houses here in expensive southern California.

      Jeff

  11. It's not that it's not legit by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's that it's a nasty scheme to harvest contacts for junk mail, telemarketing, etc.

    The company I work for partners with a lot of these companies, offering one of the things you can sign up for as part of your work toward a free whatever. The companies we work with are legit, but the idiots that sign up for this shit don't read the agreement details and then they wind up getting deluged with legally clear spam, junk mail, and telemarketing.

    It's not really free, it's just that you don't pay for what you get with cash. You pay for it with your time. You have to sift through legit spam, junk mailers, hassle with telemarketers who can now legally call you even if you're on the DNC list.

    So, hey, if you sign up and didn't read the agreement, too bad. You're an idiot, and you deserve all the crap that you get deluged with. Hope all that extra advertising was worth the free iPod.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Aroma+7herapy · · Score: 1

      hmmm.. Maybe then you can tell me WHY telemarketeers would want to call someone who is on the DNC list, even when they are allowed to do so?

    2. Re:It's not that it's not legit by bwy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's that it's a nasty scheme to harvest contacts for junk mail, telemarketing, etc.

      Well put. Whether it is "legit" or not is a secondary concern. I don't put much respect towards people who run around spending all their time spamming themselves and friends to get things for free.

      I mean, Christ-o-Mighty, We're talking 250-300 bucks here people. Get a job and earn it the old fashioned way. If true wealth were created merely by sending emails to people or by participating in some other pyramid scheme, everybody would be rich and nobody would work again (unfortunately, it would also mean that money grows on trees.) Also, it is an iPod... we're not talking about going to these extremes to feed a family. People are doing it to get a gadget that they can clearly live without.

      This is similar to the people who continually sign up for store credit cards to get discounts or "free" gifts. Apparently, they either don't understand or don't care how their credit score is derived. I know people who live their whole lives trying to get freebies. If they spent half that effort improving themselves, I'm sure they'd get a raise, better job, or something.

    3. Re:It's not that it's not legit by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Telemarketers are hired on the cheap. Generally, you hire people who are as unqualified as possible and offer around $7 an hour. Think about it this way: if you read an ad in the paper for a job that requires no previous knowledge and no skills that 99% of the population couldn't technically claim to have, and your only other option is McDonald's at $5.50 an hour, which are you going to choose?

      As a result, turnover rates are very high for the sector. There's no real reason to train the TMs then, so basically, you wind up with a bunch of overpaid High School kids who can best do their jobs by being given a huge list of viable numbers and a few scripts, and then you let them loose on the world.

      In this situation, there's no incentive to train the workers or to purge the lists (although, we do proactively purge the phone lists to some extent anyway) because you have a cost center masquerading as a profit center. Since the point of the TM calls is not so much to get you to buy anything then and there as it is to spread brand recognition, it's most cost effective to just carpet bomb the numbers you have and be done with it.

      That said, all you have to do is say not to call that number again and not to sell your information, and any legitimate group will wipe you from their personal lists anyway. Barring mistakes or people with multiple phone numbers, we don't call anyone or sell anyone's number who asks us not to, whether we're obliged to listen to them or not. I actually had a heavy hand in the programming that allowed us to automate our number removal process, and even though we quote "up to 30 days" for a number removal, it's done in 1 business day now thanks to the system I built for the process. That's more than most groups have, but any legit group will remove you within a month when you ask them to stop calling.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    4. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use throwaway email addresses, and don't use a phone number?


      Obviously, enough people reveal *something* about themselves that it's a profitable enterprise. Be sure to tell all of your friends that you refer (or, in your case, people that click your sig) to do the same.

    5. Re:It's not that it's not legit by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1

      In the hopes that they'll actually make a sale. I'd guess that a goodly percentage of people who put themselves on the DNC list are doing so not because they don't want to waste their time telling each individual telemarketing company to stop calling, but because sometimes they may actually buy stuff from them just to get off the phone.

      Some people just do not have the inner strength or what-have-you to be "rude" enough to interrupt the smooth telemarketing schpiel and say, "No, I'm not interested, don't call here ever again." If they're even vaguely interested in a product, they may well wind up buying it. They may regret it later, and they may vow to never buy anything from a telemarketer again, and the DNC list is an easy way to avoid the situation in the first place.

      It's those people, those without the willpower to say "No" to a telemarketer, that telemarketers would want to talk to.

      I have worked in phone research (not sales, and sometimes the people who did the survey did get paid, depending on the client) and a surprising number of people told me that they did the survey to be polite, or they didn't hang up on me in the beginning because it would have been rude. (I had to explain the DNC list, and that it is utterly irrelevant to research organizations, several times a day.) It's those people who would be at risk of buying stuff from a telemarketer, even though they dislike being telemarketed at enough to put themselves on the DNC list.

    6. Re:It's not that it's not legit by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Because then they don't have to filter you out of their lists. And who knows, maybe you're on the Do Not Call list because you have some batty old relative who likes to buy crap over the phone?

    7. Re:It's not that it's not legit by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Because advertising STOPPED being about getting information to people who WANTED it a long time ago (assuming it ever was. Certainly not in my lifetime.)

      ALL advertisement takes the same approach as spam now: squeeze every possible bit of exposure to as many people as you can, and hope that some of them are stupid enough to swallow it.

    8. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a job and earn it the old fashioned way. ... I know people who live their whole lives trying to get freebies. If they spent half that effort improving themselves, I'm sure they'd get a raise, better job, or something.

      I've seen a lot of jobs that exists for not much more than to pay someone money. Lots of these jobs in "office" environments. Are these any better than spending your time getting freebies? No. I believe you're pretty old fashioned yourself, making a Job and a Raise look like the ultimate of achievements. Well they're not, doing something Useful is an achievement, whether one gets paid for it or not, whether one does it as part of a "job" or not.

      Get over your "job and raise and better job" shit, you corporate drone.

    9. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telemarketers are people who can't become whores because they're the wrong sex, too scared, or too ugly^W^W^W.

    10. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically you're saying it's okay to do anything to people who sign-up as long as it's in the fine print.

      It's no wonder you're Democrat (or more likely further to the left). Your sig comment is quite ironic considering the highly unethical company you keep.

    11. Re:It's not that it's not legit by nathanh · · Score: 1
      It's that it's a nasty scheme to harvest contacts for junk mail, telemarketing, etc.

      It's not really free, it's just that you don't pay for what you get with cash. You pay for it with your time. You have to sift through legit spam, junk mailers, hassle with telemarketers who can now legally call you even if you're on the DNC list.

      Your name on a telemarketing list isn't worth $40-$60. That's not the reason why these "free stuff" offers are popping up everywhere.

      You only get the "free" iPod if you and 5 of your friends (your "referrals") sign up for expensive services like credit cards and magazine subscriptions. That's where the money is coming from. Companies like Visa see the potential of a new victim^Wcustomer with an overdrawn credit card. Gambling $40-$60 per victim is well worth it to them.

      So the real nastiness is 6 people potentially signing up for services they didn't need and probably can't afford. The person who receives their "free" iPod doesn't seem to realise they're running the risk of harming 5 other people. That's selfish and inconsiderate behaviour. Not that I'd expect anything better from the lowlife scum that perpetuate these horrible schemes.

      Some people are scamming the system by signing up for services and cancelling once they've got their "free" iPod. The service companies will not be fooled forever. They'll start requiring 18 month service agreements. I can't wait for one of these inconsiderate bastards to get stuck with a $500+ magazine subscription. That would be poetic justice.

    12. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Rebel_Princess · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Why does it bother some of y'all so much? Some throw away Hotmail addresses for a $300 device seems like a pretty good deal.

      Is it the whole corporate machine thing? Or the 'spamming' your friends? "Hey Joe, go make a new Hotmail address and sign up for a free trial on my card. Here's $10 for the 4 minutes of trouble for making an email account."

      I could sell an iPod on Ebay and heat my house for 4 fucking months with the proceeds, OR feed my family (me) for 3 months(I eat light).

      Boo-hoo, if only I'd used those 30 total minutes rounding up friends to make a fake email, I could have improved myself and taken over Steve Jobs... job. Why didn't I listen to BWY?

      And WHY did I spend 5 minutes flaming some chump on Slashdot? I wouldn't be stuck at piddly Apple and could have taken over Bill's job by now :`(

      OHH why oh bwy??

    13. Re:It's not that it's not legit by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      So the TV news is what advertising was supposed to be? Give people information about products that they might want to buy, and throw in a few murders and rapes for entertainment value.

    14. Re:It's not that it's not legit by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      It's not my job to babysit everyone. If they sign up for a credit card and run it to the limit, not my fault.

    15. Re:It's not that it's not legit by nathanh · · Score: 1

      You couldn't have demonstrated your inconsiderate behaviour moreso if you had tried.

    16. Re:It's not that it's not legit by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      There was supposedly a time when advertisers made some sort of attempt at "targeting" their ads, rather than the current "carpet-bombing" approach.

      The so-called "news" is another rant entirely.

    17. Re:It's not that it's not legit by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Just to be sure. I didn't make those people drink. They chose to do it, knowing that if they got caught they'd have to face the consequences. Perhaps if more people faced the consequences, the world would be better off

  12. Can these guys be jobbed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe there's a way to set up an automated way of "creating" email accounts and referrals?

  13. Best way to get a free iPod... by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is to get hired to work in one of Apple's retail stores! All permanent (i.e. not seasonal) employees get their very own iPod for "business" uses -- ostensibly, this is to help familiarize the Mac Specialists with the product, and also to give you a "reference" to look up data (stored as notes in the iPod). But you're completely free to store your own music on there and use it for your own purposes, too.

    (I suppose this might be too much "work" for some people, though, plus it doesn't have the fun of selling out your friends to spammers...)

    1. Re:Best way to get a free iPod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone who makes a decision on where to seek employment based on a free iPod is a complete fucking idiot and that is probably the reason why they are unemployed to begin with. My company gives us exempts roughly a 10% salary Christmas bonus every year. If I post the details will I get a +25 interesting?

    2. Re:Best way to get a free iPod... by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 1

      >> Anyone who makes a decision on where to seek employment based on a free iPod is a complete fucking idiot and that is probably the reason why they are unemployed to begin with.

      Actually, I agree with that. Whether you realize it or not, my original post was made partly in jest. It was merely intended to be informative and slightly humorous at the same time.

      You may want to look into upgrading your sense of humor... :-P

    3. Re:Best way to get a free iPod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company gives us exempts roughly a 10% salary Christmas bonus every year.

      Whee! My company just gives us competitive salaries. This means that if I quit in November, I've still received all the compensation that I deserve... Christmas bonus, freebies, whatever, they're all carrot sticks for those operating at lower than 100% mental capacity.

  14. why an ipod? by js3 · · Score: 1

    couldn't they find something a little cheaper and make even more money?

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
    1. Re:why an ipod? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      they've got several different "free" options...

      I've personally scored a "free" http://www.freeflatscreens.com in addtion to a free ipod.

      There's also http://www.freegamingsystems.com where for selling your soul and 4 others you get a "free" xbox, ps2 slim, gamecube, or nintendo ds2

      *Shrug* and there's a myriad of half-arse gratis clones out there.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:why an ipod? by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Upfront: This post is to help me get free stuff.

      Several legitimate companies are giving away other gifts; some more and less expensive than the iPod.

      I got a free iPod from J&TCooper's site, tech4free.com. I've got a page of pictures of my iPod and links to sites that are legitimate on my site. There are some very intersted items that you can get, including PC parts (also from J&TCooper), game consoles, a PC, and a lot more.

    3. Re:why an ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often make purchasing decisions based on how much I feel something "should" cost, not based on the utility I estimate the purchase will bring me. I would really like an iPod, but I'm irrationally unwilling to spend hundreds of dollars on one. I am, however, willing to spend a lot of time to try to get one.

    4. Re:why an ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would you spend the time to signup for some 40$ doohicky? Lots of people want an ipod but can't/won't rationalize the price of one, pretty easy to rationalize "free"

      couple clicks here and there, tell your friends.. vola, your friends tell thier friends.. company harvests the data and sells for a profit.

  15. Your milage may vary, but... by Kufat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disclaimer: No links to sites will be given, so people don't think I'm spamming referrals. I don't plan to do any referral-based offers in the future anyway. Additionally, I'm not affiliated with any of these sites.

    So far, I've received:
    $170 check from a free green xbox offer (now closed)
    Xbox, from another free xbox offer. (Anyfreegift)
    ipod, from freeipods.com
    $700 check, from freelaptops4you.

    Only freeipods.com required referrals. The other grand worth of money/stuff didn't. I'm currently working on a deal for a laptop from another site.

    Are some of the sites scams? Yeah. But some of them are legit, or close enough for you to get your stuff.

    1. Re:Your milage may vary, but... by seanismdotcom · · Score: 1

      What sites are you using to get the money without referrals? Could you share them with me? I got a freeipod from Gratis so I know these places are legit. Thanks!

    2. Re:Your milage may vary, but... by jesser · · Score: 1

      When you used freeipods.com, who did you give referral links to? Did you express your link as "help me get a free ipod", "get a free ipod for yourself", or both?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:Your milage may vary, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 "help me" and one that was a little of both.

      -K.

    4. Re:Your milage may vary, but... by jridley · · Score: 1

      How much time have you spent?
      Looks like you've gotten about $1200. This may or may not be a good deal. If it took you 100 hours to do, maybe it's good, maybe not. Personally I'd be a lot better off working 100 extra hours of OT, but others maybe not.

    5. Re:Your milage may vary, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps 5 hours total.

  16. click through by zlel · · Score: 5, Informative
  17. it's a scam by iamhassi · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    it's a scam:
    --"I have had two friends sign up for this promotion. Both got five friends at the same time and one was told her iPod was being shipped and the other was denied for mysterious reasons. So even if you fulfill the requirements, you'll only get super-spammed instead of an iPod."
    --"I know several people who completed the offers, had their friends complete the offer and never got anything. Not to mention they got signed up for every mailing list in existence."

    posts like that are enough for me to declare they're a scam.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:it's a scam by smashr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am currently listening to the iPod mini i got from the freeipods site. I signed up in late july for one of the AOL offers. The link spent a couple weeks in my AIM profile and I had the five referrals by early august. My order was confirmed on Aug 11 and I had it in my hand by mid October (due to the ipod mini shortages). I canceled the AOL for broadband in a 5min phone call. To date I have not recieved any phone or snail mail spam directly related, and it was a throwaway email address.

      Will it work for absolutely everyone?
      -No

      Will everyone who signs up get a free ipod?
      -Probably not

      Did I get a free ipod for less than an hours worth of work?
      -Yup

      Its not a scam. They make money AND give out "free" ipods.

    2. Re:it's a scam by skatrek · · Score: 0

      I don't mean to sound totally naive (I am a Slashdot reader ;), but why don't you just do what I did and make a different email address? Best case scenario you get the free goods, worst case scenario, you close down the email account and forget about it! Plus, I signed up for the RealRhapsody service (I haven't completed all the referrals yet) and stuck with it - it's definitely worth the $10 a month, and my friend (who did receive a free 20GB iPod) signed up with the Columbia House DVD club and has stuck with it... not all the offers are always stupid "Sign up for 9482 free hours of AOL" or "Ancestry.com" or credit cards.

    3. Re:it's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I got one too and I hardly even get a drop of spam!

    4. Re:it's a scam by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what you're saying is, if two people for some reason fall under the scrutiny of Gratis and are denied their ipods (who knows the real reason why, that's not the point) while hundreds of others have in fact recieved their product, it's still a scam? Right. For all you know your "mysteriously denied" friend could have broken the rules or whatever.

      Also, I signed up for freeipods with my gmail address. The only spam I get is dictionary-type attacks, and i hardly think those would be necessary if my addy had supposedly been sold by Gratis. If you sign up for an offer and THAT company sells your info, that's your own lookout. Gratis does not, as best I can tell.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:it's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > while hundreds of others have in fact recieved their product

      Wrong. That's the problem. They haven't been sending-out any iPods. Which part of that don't you understand? They're spammers. When have you ever known a spammer to tell the truth?

    6. Re:it's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. That's the problem. They haven't been sending-out any iPods. Which part of that don't you understand? They're spammers. When have you ever known a spammer to tell the truth?

      Funny. I guess I never received this ipod that I'm using right now. I suppose too that the free television that I got from gratis also never arrived and found it's way into my bedroom. Nope.

    7. Re:it's a scam by MShield · · Score: 1

      damn it, I bought one and I STILL get spam.

    8. Re:it's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scam huh? you just keep telling yourself that.. and i'll keep listening to my 20GB iPod. i signed up for freeipods.com back in september, got my 5 referrals through message boards, and recieved my iPod about 6 weeks later.

      convinced, my roommate signed up and got his 6 weeks after that.

      i'm currently working on helping my brother to get his.

  18. I knew it. by flatface · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why do people bother asking me why I have this in my sig? Nobody seems to be able to put 2 and 2 together and see why I spend my mod points this way. So now, if you advertise your freeipod link, you're spamming people directly and indirectly.

    1. Re:I knew it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:I knew it. by calibanDNS · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can change your preferences to not display sigs in Slashdot comments right here.

    3. Re:I knew it. by flatface · · Score: 0, Troll
      Copy/pasted from the discussion I linked:

      I know that I can turn off sigs, but I'd also miss some good ones.


      I'm not going to get rid of everyone's sigs for that. I've tried once, but found myself turning it back on because of OT discussions about them. Plus, when I moderate I get to see who I should mod down. You might think that's stupid, but guess what: It's my choice to have sigs on or off, and it's also my choice to mod spammers down.

      It's a good thing you're one of my friend's foes (You should know who, he makes free*.com spammers his foes), so you already stand out.
    4. Re:I knew it. by value_added · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Why do people bother asking me why I have this in my sig?"

      Not to worry. I won't. Ever.

      Slashdot -> Preferences -> Comments -> Disable Sigs

      Now if I could only get rid of the excessive whitespace from the HTML-Formatted-But-Don't-Preview crowd, I won't have anything to complain about.

    5. Re:I knew it. by arose · · Score: 1

      You can change your brain not to post shit like this.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    6. Re:I knew it. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the people who put them outside of their sigs. (Look up)

  19. I got mine! by seanismdotcom · · Score: 1

    I got my iPod thru Gratis. Signed up in september and had my link wh0red on my website and a couple others then 1 month or so later I open my door and there is a package from UPS. Got mine in October I believe. Took about a month to process it but I cannot complain since I got a $300 item for FREE!

    1. Re:I got mine! by gregfortune · · Score: 1

      *click*

      The sound you hear as 700,000 slashdotters add you to their foes list.

  20. Ed McMahon by haffi · · Score: 2, Funny

    You may have won 1,000,000 dollars.

    sound familiar?

    -haffi

    1. Re:Ed McMahon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're telling me Ed McMahon is going to give me a free iPod?

      Cool.

  21. Don't forget your free Nintendo DS!! by PFritz21 · · Score: 1

    I've also seen web sites promising free Nintendo DS's. And then there are those e-mails I get from Nigerian doctor M'Bala Nbutu about getting $20 million. Just a reminder: If it sounds to good to be true, it is.

    1. Re:Don't forget your free Nintendo DS!! by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Good day, friend! I am Ubuntu Linux from ubuntulinux.org, and I am a licenced GPL project. I cordially request your assistance in transferring a sum of 10 (ten) Ubuntu Linux Install Compact Discs to you. Please accept my utmost promise that this is not a scam! Recently one of my co-workers Debian Linux passed away, but left much valuable code behind. Please reply immediately if you are interested in helping me.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Don't forget your free Nintendo DS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Desk of : Chief Thambo Coker. B.Sc. (SAU) M.Sc., MNIM
      ______________
      DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENERGY, PRETORIA,
      SOUTH AFRICA.

      Sir,
      It is my great pleasure to write you this letter on behalf of my colleagues.Your information was given to me by a member of the South African Export Promotion Council (SAEPC) Who was with
      the Government delegation on a trip to your country for a bilateral conference talk to encourage foreign investors. I have decided to seek a confidential co-operation with you in the execution of the deal hereunder for the benefit of all parties and hope you will keep it confidential because of the nature of this business. Within the Department of Minerals & Energy where I work as a Director of Audit and Project Implementation and with the co-operation of two other top officials, we have in our possession an overdue payment in US funds.

      The said funds represent certain percentage of the total contract value executed on behalf of my Department by a foreign contracting firm which we the officials over-invoiced to the
      amount of US$26,500,000.00 (Twenty Six Million Five Hundred Thousand US Dollars). Though the actual contract cost has been paid to the original contractor,leaving the excess balance
      unclaimed.

      Since the present elected Government is determined to pay foreign contractors all debts owed, so as to maintain good relationship with foreign governments and non- government
      agencies, we included our bills for approvals with the Department of Finance and the Reserve Bank of South Africa (RBSA). We are seeking your assistance to front as beneficiary of the unclaimed funds, since we are not allowed to operate foreign accounts. Details and change of beneficiary information upon application for claim to reflect payment and approvals will
      be secured on behalf of you/your company. I have the authority of my partners involved to propose that should you be willing to assist us in this transaction your share as compensation will be
      Twenty five percent (25%), while my colleagues and I receive Sixty Five percent (65%) and the balance of Ten percent (10%) for taxation and miscellaneous expenses incurred.

      The business is completely safe and secure, provided you treat it with utmost confidentiality. It does not matter whether you/your company does contract projects as a transfer of powers will be secured in favour of you/your company. Also, your area of specialization is not a hindrance to the successful execution of this transaction. I have reposed my confidence in you and hope that you will not disappoint us. Kindly notify me via email, for further details upon your acceptance of this proposal.

      Thanks for your co-operation.

      Regards,
      Chief Thambo Coker.

  22. What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by mldl · · Score: 1

    People always seem to cite something being a pyramid scheme as the obvious reason we should fear and run away from something. However there's one important thing to remember: it's good at the top.

    Like the article says getting your free ipod is presumably as easy as ragging out your friends. So it comes down to what's more important - friends or a shiny new ipod.

    While I don't know the validity of this particular offer just beware that the only losers are the guys on the bottom row. Just make sure that isn't you.

    1. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Informative

      While I don't know the validity of this particular offer just beware that the only losers are the guys on the bottom row. Just make sure that isn't you.

      And that ain't gonna happen. Sooner or later you will end up in the bottom row. Why?

      Because your success depends on the pyramid growing. And the pyramid CAN'T GROW FOREVER. At an geometric growth rate, it requires less than 30 generations to reach the world population. It's like a 30 bit number, but this time bits are base 10 or 12.

      This means that sooner or later, the pyramid will experience the so-called "bubble effect". Soon the ones at the bottom will stop generating revenue for you, and this means you'll stop generating revenue for the ones above you, and the pyramid collapses (meaning that the base will always disappear). Then the pyramid becomes VERY narrow and it's like it's started again.

      These pyramid schemes are always fraudulent because they promise you an impossible success. It's impossible because the base growth can't be maintained. It happened with Amway, Scientology, and major bible cults. In the end, the base always suffers the worst consequences. And if you were at the base, you'll be again.

      The fraud in this case is that you don't get the free ipod INSTANTLY. You need to prove your worth. And that means submitting LOTS of e-mails to spammers. And those aren't even IN the pyramid. They're above it.

      And don't tell me that the ad isn't deceptive. Hiding the nasty details in fine print, ON PURPOSE, is one of the greatest frauds in marketing.

      In general, the pyramid scheme is evil, because your earnings depend on how many people you abuse or cause to be abused .

    2. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by bwy · · Score: 1

      The problem is, every pyramid scheme breaks at some point. There is a finite number of people in the world.

    3. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by Aluion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because eventually you run out of PEOPLE.

      If everyone who wants to sign up is placed on the list, then there will be a point in time that there is no one else willing to sign up, therefore no one can be refered, and therefore no one at the bottom of the list gets anything (but spam). Why do you think your last 8-9 posts that have been praising their offers haven't inticed anyone? It's because if they were actually intrested in it, they would have clicked on one of the last 10 emails they got with the same offer. I've even seen people give an additional bonus, such as a gmail invite, to people who sign up. There's no one really willing to do just for the free(insertitem) anymore.

      Besides, some people actually value their personal information over a free(insertitem).

      By the way, the free(insertitem) offers are not pyramid schemes. They are matrix scheme varients. However, it doesn't make them any more reliable.

    4. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but this time bits are base 10 or 12.

      bit=Binary digIT=base 2

    5. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by Aluion · · Score: 1
      Yes, but they, too, have to complete the offer before you get anything out of it. Besides, you are only 40% complete, not even halfway there, so don't start choosing out the mp3s you're going to put on it just yet.

      Did you miss the part in the article where it said that 1 in 12 actually receive an item? Assuming those numbers are correct, that means that even if you complete the offer, you have a 8% chance of getting anything. That means that 92% get nothing.
      *Insert joke about free lunch and getting spam here*

      Besides, offers like these encourage people to spam. Anything that encourages spam is a Bad Thing.

      What's keeping them from selling free(whatever).com to a less trustworthy business? Have you read the fine print? Specifically the part about how they can put your account on hold, how they don't have to notify you about it, how they can change their privacy at any point in time (like the point just after you get all the referals, for instance). I'm more trustworthy of that Nigerian that emailed me the other day. Sure, all the other Nigerians were scammers, but this one might actually be legit!

    6. Re:What's _really_ wrong with pyramid schemes? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      s/in the world/on the net who want an iPod and have the lack of etchics to whore out friends and family to get it/

      HTH.

  23. Free iPod? Yeah, right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know of anyone who ever got one of those "free iPods" from these guys. Harvesting emails and personal info for marketing is one thing but doing it by making false promises is another one. I honestly hope that the Department of Justice will be looking into that.

    1. Re:Free iPod? Yeah, right! by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      You might want to do some research online before you jump to such conclusions. I did my research, read articles about the deals in Wired, checked with the better business, and even found a site where people could network and see "proof" that people do actually get free stuf. As for emails, yeah, they got an email alias of mine, that was killed after the deal. They made no requirement that you couldn't use a throwaway email addy. Personal info? You mean the name that went with the email address? Then for a shipping address, just have it shipped to work. I gave up some time, and then paid back people that signed up thru me with Gmail and a webpage to help them get more refs.

      Don't like it? Fine, but don't post false comments.

      CB

    2. Re:Free iPod? Yeah, right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask any Amway representative if the program works, they will all tell you it is great.

  24. I did read the fine print a while ago. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Informative

    Among the things I read:

    1) The company isn't responsible if you're not ellegible for the free ipod list.

    2) The company doesn't guarantee that if you're ellegible, it will send you the free ipod.

    3) The company doesn't guarantee that when they send it, it will arrive.

    In other words, the company doesn't guarantee A THING.

    It's a scam. Just a SPAM frontend.

    1. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by seanismdotcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And all I have to say is what do you have to loose except for a couple clicks on a website and a disposable email getting spammed? Most offers are free and/or you can cancel in time so you don't get charged a thing. A lot of my friends thought the same way as you and after recieving my iPod I just called them up and let them know the good news. Now some of them are signing up as well.

    2. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by seanismdotcom · · Score: 2, Informative

      here is a screenshot of the processing page...
      http://seanism.com/freeipod/ipodorder.gif
      http://seanism.com/freeipod/senttovendor.gif

      and a clip of the screenshot after they sent it...
      http://seanism.com/freeipod/shipped.gif

    3. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still suck for using IE

    4. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      3) The company doesn't guarantee that when they send it, it will arrive.

      To be fair to them, that last one isn't as bad as it may sound - unless they're delivering it themselves they can't really guarantee it. If they're sending it by mail or courier, it's up to the firm that's actually devilering it to guarantee delivery, surely.

      That said, I've never seen that sort of disclaimer before either...

    5. Re:I did read the fine print a while ago. by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they never even technically guarantee that you will get an iPod at all.

      They suspended my account as suspected fraud because two of the referrals I had were under jeffornot.com email accounts. It took three tries for it to be accepted, and over a month to finally receive it. The day before I received it, the freeipod people told me it would take another 4 weeks. They still don't even know that I've received it, just that it's been shipped.

      And for all the non-believers, here's me and my iPod: http://jeff.jeffornot.com/photos/ipod/pb200060.jpg

  25. Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    http://www.bugmenot.com/ offers a way around this stupid registration requirement for this and many other websites. For example, I just got in thanks to them using the following:

    user: suckerdj
    pass: suckerdj

    If enough people start using bugmenot, these bastards just might stop requiring us to give them our life history to access a bit of information.

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:Read with no registration by LGagnon · · Score: 1

      If enough people start using bugmenot, these bastards just might stop requiring us to give them our life history to access a bit of information.

      Or they might just block out bugmenot. I've been using it myself for some time now, and I get several unusable screennames.

    2. Re:Read with no registration by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 1

      The BugMeNot FireFox extension is also highly recommended, auto-fills the input boxes for us lazy types.

      --
      Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
      Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
    3. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If enough people start using bugmenot, these bastards just might stop requiring us to give them our life history to access a bit of information."

      NYT doesn't require anything, just a unique email address, doesn't even have to be valid. Settle down.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      So? That's when you go and make a throw-away account at yahoo and give the offending site false information, then share the new name with bugmenot. That's why the system works, if everyone took that pacifist attitude, then it would never work.

      And before you ask "why shouldn't I just make myself an account on a throw-away email address?" I would submit that if enough people contribute, you won't *have* to. I would wager that at higher-volume sites like nytimes.com, each set of credentials gets at least 100 uses before being blocked. And BTW, I have only gotten a few bad logins for lower-volume sites (like my local newspaper) but in all cases, clicking the "this login doesn't work" button produces another that does work.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    5. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry pal, but you are wrong. Try filling in only the username, password, and email fields, and watch the following appear:

      There is a problem highlighted in red below. For help, click here.

      # Please enter a GENDER.
      # Please enter a BIRTH YEAR.
      # Please enter a ZIP CODE.
      # Please select an INCOME RANGE.
      # Please select an INDUSTRY.
      # Please select a JOB TITLE.
      # Please select a JOB FUNCTION.
      # Please select a NEWSPAPER USAGE.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    6. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, and they don't validate any of it. They don't even have you click a link after you've recieved an email from them to activate the account.

      You don't have to give them info. Put garbage in the blanks, then sit down and shut up. I'm tired of you self-righteous loud-mouths with your campaign against NYT. And for what? No more registration screen that NYT has every right to request for providing all that content? Why don't you guys go do something useful and rattle your pitchforks against Microsoft's registration program for XP instead of bitching about something that barely registers as an inconvenience?

      (p.s. Don't take my harsh words too personally, that rant's been building up for quite a while now.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      LOL that was great thanks. I haven't had a good hearty laugh all day.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    8. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of you self-righteous loud-mouths with your campaign against NYT.

      So, just what is your position over there at the NYT? Director of online advertising? Or maybe you're the one who sells out their subscribers to their "partners?"

    9. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They don't even have you click a link after you've recieved an email from them to activate the account.

      Then is the following text on the NYT registration form a typo?
      You will be sent a confirmation e-mail to validate your address.
    10. Re:Read with no registration by metamorphage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a newspaper you're reading. You get a free copy of one of the country's best papers, and you're whining about entering an email address and some personal info. Stop bitching, you're not paying anything and the Times doesn't sell your soul to the devil.

    11. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      one of the country's best papers
      Um, that's debatable at best.

      you're not paying anything
      Yes I am. My privacy is valuable to me.

      the Times doesn't sell your soul to the devil.
      Yes it does.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    12. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Dunno. As soon as I filled it out with a garbage address, I had access to the story.

      You could have saved yourself some embarrasment if you had just tried what I had suggested.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have saved yourself a lot of embarrasment by validating what you threw out as fact. Seems to me like you got shut the fuck down above when that dude above pointed out that you were dead wrong about what fields were required..............

    14. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yes I am. My privacy is valuable to me."

      Giving up of privacy is not required to join NYT. I made this point earlier in this thread, but it's worth stating again: You can put nothing but garbage in those fields, even in the email field, and it'll let you in. The only privacy you lose is the privacy you volunteer.

      On a fundamental level, I agree with you, but NYT really should not be in your crosshairs. Asking to voluntarily provide information is not a crime. If you really don't want to give it up, then don't read their content.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "You could have saved yourself a lot of embarrasment by validating what you threw out as fact. Seems to me like you got shut the fuck down above when that dude above pointed out that you were dead wrong about what fields were required.............."

      I have access to the stories on NYT, and they don't have any personal info on me. Shot/shut down? Heh. Yeah.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So, just what is your position over there at the NYT? Director of online advertising? Or maybe you're the one who sells out their subscribers to their "partners?""

      Heh. Has anybody ever won a debate using the "You must work for the bad guy!" rebuttal? Running out of steam there, buddy?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      The NYT is not in my crosshairs, bugmenot provides me with credentials to access lots of other sites as well. In fact, it's even faster then providing a junk registration, because as an earlier post points out, the firefox extension automatically fills it in for me. If it doesn't work, it just tries the next one.

      Also, it's not about registration. It's about my right to be able to access the Internet in privacy. I also use an anonymous proxy, because my ISP seems to think it's cool to provide a hostname like this:

      [neighborhood].[city].[isp-name].net

      Anyone who has the same (national) ISP knows what I am talking about. It's a cable provider who segments their network by neighborhood, and names all of those segments by the name of the neighborhood. Seems logical, right? What if my kid (and yes, I do take safeguards against this) posts in a forum that his dad's red suv was just in a wreck? Well, let's just resolve that IP to its neighborhood then go drive around till we find a wrecked red SUV... I know that's pushing it, but it still proves my point.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    18. Re:Read with no registration by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Right, and they don't validate any of it. They don't even have you click a link after you've recieved an email from them to activate the account.


      So on top of all that BS they demand, they run an abusable mailing list by allowing additions without confirmation ? Yep, you're right. NYT aren't incompetant and/or malicious asshats. Not in the slightest.

      If you beleive that, I have a free ipod offer for you.

    19. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So on top of all that BS they demand, they run an abusable mailing list by allowing additions without confirmation ?"

      To be fair, though I do agree with your point, that's a flaw with email in general, not just NYT. Anybody can send you email, solicited or not. Fortunately, they are just one entity, and I imagine they honor the unsubscription methods. 'Abuse' would be about as extensive as putting your email address in, they send ya something, and you unsubscribe. If I were to do it again, then all you'd have to do is put a filter on NYTimes.com and boom, abuse proof. It sucks that NYT is running like this, but the potential of damage done is pretty limited.

      This problem needs to be solved on a more fundamental level. Email is too easy to abuse in the first place. Ever put your email address on Slashdot without 'spam armor'? Don't, unless it's a throw-away address. You'll get flooded with crap. All because there's no challenge/response with regards to email. Anybody can send you anything. Pretty weak.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice dodge. So, what *is* your position at the NYT?

    21. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you guys go do something useful and rattle your pitchforks against Microsoft's registration program for XP instead of bitching about something that barely registers as an inconvenience?

      Microsoft's half-baked registration barely registers as an inconvenience to me. I don't use it and Slashdot doesn't often link to content that requires me to register Windows XP before I can see it. I see NYT links here every damn day. ...and if Microsoft's registration scheme really bothers you, you can either pay for Windows or stop using it.

    22. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Well, despite all the comments I make to the tune of being a 3D artist, I'm really the CEO of NYTimes.com. I figure the best way to improve subscribership is to reply to anonymous retards on Slashdot and spin them around to my point of view. I figure with the 3 or 4 discussions I have on this matter every year, our subscription numbers will double. That's why I make the big bucks.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      It's also a problem with snail mail. Anyone can brute force mass mailings by sending mail to [1-9999] Main Street (just like email). Sure, some will bounce (just like email). However, some people will buy whatever crap you are peddling (just like email), which makes it profitable in the long run (just like email). That is why you haven't seen a decrease in the amount of junk mail you get in your snail mail box, just like your email box. For that matter, until the no-call lists came about, telemarketing followed the same principle.

      Which proves my original point, that if you don't protect your privacy at every turn, you will lose it quickly.

      PS. If you have ever wondered how you can opt-out of at least some of those snail mail ads you get, look here:
      http://www.dmaconsumers.org/cgi/offmailinglistdave

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    24. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " if you don't protect your privacy at every turn, you will lose it quickly."

      I think we agree on that.

      And thanks for the link! Much appreciated. Good night. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    25. Re:Read with no registration by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      You're most welcome. It's been fun, g'nite :D

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    26. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent, *excellent* reply.

    27. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and they don't validate any of it.

      You claimed that they didn't require anything but a unique email address. That's bullshit. Now, stop trying to weasle out of it, dumbass. Admit you were wrong, and stop trying to be a fucking weasle.

    28. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Whoop de doo. I could have been clearer. Go ahead and dwell on a questionable phrasing of my original post. Meanwhile, I'm still right, and you still embarrased yourself. If that wasn't true, you wouldn't be going on and on about my original post. Grow up.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    29. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, aren't you clever. You won't take good advice, but you'll happily dish it out. Hypocrite.

    30. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # Please enter a GENDER.
      Blue
      # Please enter a BIRTH YEAR.
      26 b.c.
      # Please enter a ZIP CODE.
      90210
      # Please select an INCOME RANGE.
      0-oo
      # Please select an INDUSTRY.
      Atomic weapons
      # Please select a JOB TITLE.
      Plutonium taste tester
      # Please select a JOB FUNCTION.
      Taste plutonium
      # Please select a NEWSPAPER USAGE.
      Dog... cat... bird... fire

    31. Re:Read with no registration by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      'Abuse' would be about as extensive as putting your email address in, they send ya something, and you unsubscribe.

      Actually, the problem with unconfirmed opt-in is that anyone ELSE can put my email address in, then I get spammed by NYT, unsubscribe. Repeat.

      There ARE ways to RESPONSIBLY run an email list. NYT has just chosen NOT to.

    32. Re:Read with no registration by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Actually, the problem with unconfirmed opt-in is that anyone ELSE can put my email address in, then I get spammed by NYT, unsubscribe. Repeat."

      I covered that with the little bit about blocking NYTimes.com. You don't have much excuse for not having a mail app that doesn't easily support that feature.

      "There ARE ways to RESPONSIBLY run an email list. NYT has just chosen NOT to."

      Perhaps. Never said otherwise. However, the reason you have such things as mail filters is because email is inherently insecure, not because NYT is the big a big ol incompetent meanie.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    33. Re:Read with no registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another good way:
      user: gorevidal
      pass: gorevidal

    34. Re:Read with no registration by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I covered that with the little bit about blocking NYTimes.com. You don't have much excuse for not having a mail app that doesn't easily support that feature.

      If by "app" you mean "client", then no, they aren't filtered in my mail "app." Anything they try to send to me or my users is rejected by my server until they decide to educate themselves on, and impliment, a few "best practices."

      However, the reason you have such things as mail filters is because email is inherently insecure, not because NYT is the big a big ol incompetent meanie

      Mail being insecure is good reason not to use it to share sensitive data. It has nothing to do with it being abused. If NYT won't take steps to prevent themselves from being abused, whether out of meanness, laziness, or cluelessness, then they ARE too incompetent to be allowed to put a server on the internet.

      By the by, don't extoll too highly the praises of "mail filters" as used by mail "apps." They won't do anyone a lot of good under a spam bomb or joe job that makes a slashdotting look like a walk in the park (~10 msgs/sec, maintained constantly for 5-10 days)

    35. Re:Read with no registration by JAFSlashdotter · · Score: 1
      I hate this stupid registration thing as much as anyone, but I do have to at least point out that months ago, I gave NYT a disposable sneakemail address, and have yet to receive a thing (from them, or from anyone else) on it. They haven't sent any spam, nor have they sold it to someone else [yet]. At least abusing the list by putting in someone else's email address to get them signed up for lots of spam wouldn't work. Of course, they could change that policy tomorrow -- which is why I always use disposable addresses.

      One wonders why they even bother collecting them if they don't validate them, they don't use them to contact you, and they don't sell them.

      --
      We apologize for the preceding message. All those responsible have been sacked.
    36. Re:Read with no registration by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      Bravo! I stopped supporting Windows after I got XP back in 2002. I still run it in a VMWare machine ( http://www.vmware.com/ for the few times I actually need it ( Windows-only programs, such as my WiFi device Web interface that requires IE, no workee under Mozilla ). As far as requiring registration, I came to ( and stay with Slashdot ) because it did not *require* registration. You can register, but you don't have to in order to use the site. In NYT, they require you ( there are ways around, but as far as they are concerned, it is a requirement ) to give them a working email address. There is no choice.

      So, I come to a site that is all about choice of identifying myself or remaining anonymous ( which is a huge benefit of the Internet, and why I use it ), but then am faced with a choice ( or lack thereof ) of reading a linked story, or having to register it. I think this situation is very contradictory. N'est pas? A compromise would be to require the submitter to provide a way for people referred from Slashdot ( HTTP_Referrer, anyone? ) to have anonymous accesss to any pages relevant to the article. Note that this may/may not include the entire site. The submitter can provide a general-purpose login for those who which to remain anonymous, or could use the aforementioned http_referer method, or provide some other method.

      That way, people who wish to login can login, people who don't wish to will not have to, and both groups will have a much better opinion of the site. This will indirectly increase the chance that more people will willingly sign up as they realize the site gave them a choice, and therefore is not likely to be intrusive and is more in-line with the spirit of the original public Internet.

      Thank You,

      ~Fortezza

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    37. Re:Read with no registration by metamorphage · · Score: 1

      Also, it's not about registration. It's about my right to be able to access the Internet in privacy. If you want a copy of the Times without giving up your privacy, either follow NanoGator's advice (which you have clearly done), or walk up to a newsstand, pony up a buck and get your very own paper copy. It's more fun to read it in paper, too.

  26. If anyone by staeiou · · Score: 5, Funny

    I swear, those people with the free iPod links will be FIRST up against the wall when the revolution comes.

    1. Re:If anyone by Hopelessness · · Score: 4, Funny

      Curiously enough, an edition of the NYT that fell through a time warp from 1000 years in the future defined 'those people' as a bunch of mindless jerks who were the first up against the wall when the revolution came.

  27. It is really not that bad by AdityaG · · Score: 0

    Well if all the people who said "is it worth your time?" can actually afford paying 300 bucks for an mp3 player. Go ahead. You are not selling of your information to some shady company. These are companies like blockbuster, AOL and Earthlink. They get you info from others anyways. They are just giving these people money for sending them "potential" customers. Most other people just give them email addys and names. Gratis is giving them people who are trying out their product. Which is why they are getting big bucks in return. And if I can get a free ipod by just signing up for a free blockbuster trial and asking 5 friends to do the same, I don't see how that is a bad deal at all! -Aditya

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re:Oh this old and boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    AOL is a reputable company that won't start charging your credit card on whim?

    If you've ever tried to cancel an AOL subscription, you've probably noticed that their employees are likely fired if they cancel a single subscription. AOL has been the target of numerous class-actions, and I don't think I'm the only one who's had this experience

  30. Great by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Now the ipod spammers on livejournal and elsewhere will point out this article as absolute proof that ITS NOT A SCAM and its totally free with no strings attached.

  31. I wanted an iPod so I bought one by theurge14 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Anything else sounds shady to me.

  32. There's no Retard in Team by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has any common sense would read the terms/conditions for these things and see its not very hard to follow the *rules*. I've already gotten my free ipod. I of course, used a brand new yahoo account in order to prevent my mail email account from being spammed. I don't understand why articles come out about these things blasting them to pieces because a few people feel screwed over cause they didn't get something for FREE.

    Thats right, FREE. Unless you want to count the time it takes (sure sure, time is money, but when its your free time, its just that. Free. Or hell, do it while at work.. back to main post) then you really don't have a lay down a damn penny. I signed up for the free AOL trial and canceled my account within 20 days, after my referral had gone through. I got 5 of my bestest friends to help me out. a month later a nice brand new ipod was sitting on my desk. Sure, it took a bit of time to get it, but hell, I paid nothing for one of the hottest gadgets around.

    --

    [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    1. Re:There's no Retard in Team by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *a few people feel screwed over cause they didn't get something for FREE.* the company claims it's free. it's not. therefore, it is a scam.

      if you can think that these things work in large scale for everyone's benefit, i got a hundred get rich quick schemes to promote to you.

      i suppose you blast people who say a 2.5% intrest rate per day 'investment' is a scam as being "negative losers" too(hey, it works as long as you get 5 people more to get in after you and they too get some people to join infinitely).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:There's no Retard in Team by RedBear · · Score: 1

      It's really simple. People hate this because it's a pyramid scheme. It promises something to entice you to give up personal information and refer other people to give up their personal information, but for the majority of the participants the promise can never be fulfilled. As the pyramid gets bigger it gets harder and harder to get anything out of the deal, until the market gets totally saturated and the pyramid collapses.

      You don't lose any money in this particular scheme unless you bought some stuff along the way from the advertisers and didn't cancel it, but a whole lot of people (not a few, the base of the pyramid is always geometrically larger than the top) get inconvenienced with absolutely nothing to show for it besides the fact that YOU got yourself an iPod. You USED 5 of your bestest(sic) friends to get your free junk, while giving bogus information to the scam. If your friends don't happen to be in the first couple of generations of this pyramid, they likely get NOTHING for their trouble. That's just not cool.

      Pyramid schemes are always wrong and hated, because the majority of the participants ALWAYS lose (or don't win free stuff, same thing). Because of the nature of a pyramid scheme, it cannot be otherwise. Plus, some of us find both our time and our privacy is worth something, and not to be given away lightly so that someone higher up on the pyramid can get something for free.

    3. Re:There's no Retard in Team by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

      Good points. But AFAIK, a pyramid scheme requires you to give up money. But thats just a technicality. And the people I asked to do this for me understood that they would probably get nothing out of it besides my gratitude. It's cool with all of them, they were willing to help a friend out without needing anything in return. That's just what friends do.

      --

      [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    4. Re:There's no Retard in Team by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Whether you're giving up money, time, information or any other resource, it's still a pyramid scheme. As long as your buddies knew what they were getting into, no problem, at least on your side. But the company promised your buddies the same thing you got, even though they probably can never get it. It's still a pyramid scheme where most people end up getting nothing for their [time/money/whatever] but still contribute to Gratis making money from their referral. So, many people have a problem supporting it at all. Congratulations on getting in early and getting your free stuff.

      As the geometric expansion of the pyramid progresses, the promise becomes more and more of a lie, even if it's never a provable, outright lie. I guess that's the main problem I have with it. The whole concept is bogus despite the fact that it isn't technically a "scam". The real place to be to make out in the deal is: CEO of Gratis. That guy probably owns a couple of Ferrari's by now. Whoever he stole the idea from was one smart cookie.

      Happy Holidays to all.

  33. eMarket Resarch Group by XMyth · · Score: 1

    Here's a interesting thread on just how legit this company is....

    (read the last page)

    http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?threadid=770

  34. It is free by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 0

    I think its free, my friend got one and he paid nothing.... I would say that was free, now I try to get one and I wont pay anything... http://www.freeipods.com/?r=8100213?

  35. it works... by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

    ..I haven't tried it myself, but a fellow sys admin at work (who also happens to be an RA in our college) went through the hoops and did, in fact, receive his iPod. Me? I don't have the patience to go through with it -- besides, my iPod was free to begin with - I received it as a gift. :)

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. I've tried by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

    Many times. And I think I'd be a very good Apple Store employee. But they hardly hire anyone, so good luck.

    1. Re:I've tried by Ghoser777 · · Score: 1

      Or there are more qualified people applying then there are positions to fill.

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    2. Re:I've tried by Morlark · · Score: 1
      "The liberals need to be rounded up and placed in camps, and worked until they die."

      Spoken like a true enemy of liberty. What is it you hate most about your country? Is it the freedom?

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    3. Re:I've tried by jcr · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you want to work at Apple, you have to be persistent. Most of the Apple employees I know got the third or fourth job they interviewed for (and they'd applied many more times than that.)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  38. Calculator for the value of your demographics info by rufusdufus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a site I found that has a calculator that suggest how much the bits of information about you are "worth".
    They suggest you "refer" agencies which collect information about you to this site so you are properly compensated.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Wrong site? by System.out.println() · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you wonder why apparently rational Slashdot users ....

    What slashdot have you been reading, exactly?

  41. The math behind this whole scheme by JayBees · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My friend came to me back in the summer, asking me to sign up under him at freeipods.com. At this point there wasn't much information about Gratis' operation on the Internet, so I did some back of the envelope calculations to figure out how the hell these guys could make money by giving away iPods.

    I ended up posting my results here. Quick summary: It's economically viable. I wish I had thought of this first.

    1. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Its still an illegal pyramid scheme. Yes, the people at the top get theirs. At *any* point in time, for any given number of people who *have* gotten an iPod, there are *always* at least 5 times as many who have not. At *NO* point will everyone who has signed up have received one, and therein is why its a scam, and illegal.

      The *ONLY* people who benefit by convincing people it isnt a scam are the people getting the 'commisions' from the various things people have to signup for to qualify, and the people who have already signed into it and realize that they have wasted their time and some money if they dont get other people to sign up.

    2. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by flosofl · · Score: 1

      People here seem to think that eventually this will run through the population and be done. Why? There is nothing that says you can't go back and sign up for more stuff. So you get a circle of friends of 5 people and complete the req's for each other. I don't know if you can sign up for the 45 days of free AOL - cancel - and repeat, but there seems to be a lot of other stuff you can sign up for. Unlike traditional pyramid schemes, you are not "stuck" on the stratum you entered on.

      That being said, my privacy and the privacy of my friends is not for sale. I would never enter one of these things. I make enough money and will simply cough up the simoleans if I want an iPod or a flat screen.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    3. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by JayBees · · Score: 1

      "There is nothing that says you can't go back and sign up for more stuff."

      Yes, there is. The Gratis TOS says only one account is allowed per household, as the site linked in the parent makes clear. Rumor has it they also check for identical IP addresses to enforce this.

    4. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Apparently you've missed all the stories about how notoriously hard it is to *CANCEL* AOL. About your only chance, would be to find some sort of prepaid CC or something you can use to sign up, that after you've met the requirements and obtained your iPod or whatever AOL will have no further mechanism to charge you.

      Its a pyramid, its a scam, plain and simple, and if it isnt illegal its at least walking the fine line.

    5. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by jcr · · Score: 1

      Pyramid scheme, yes. Illegal, probably not.

      If they were taking your money, which you were giving up in hopes of getting more than you've put in, then it would be a plain-vanilla ponzi scheme. The twist they've come up with is that the money comes from the advertisers that they sell your contact info to, not from you.

      Yes, I have talked to my local DA about this. He wasn't interested in pursuing it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by tmbg37 · · Score: 1

      Cancelling with AOL isn't so hard, just very frustrating. You just have to be very firm with them, sit through their bullshit explanations of why AOL is the best thing ever, and explain to them that you don't want another month free, you just want to cancel. Eventually they'll do it, but very reluctantly.

      --
      This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
    7. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and try and get one more payment.

    8. Re:The math behind this whole scheme by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      I wonder how AOL's account drones would react to "I'm moving to a new house that has no phone or cable service", or even "He died. I'm his brother and I already have Internet service from insert ISP here. Fuck off and leave me alone".

  42. Citibank by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    Citibank is giving away iPod Minis if you open a checking account and keep it for a year, and pay two bills online a month from it. (Go to their main page and click the picture of the iPod if you want the details).

    Note that this is no psuedo-pyramid scheme. You do not have to sign anyone else up. Reading the fine print, and adding up the fees, and taking into account the opportunity cost of having money in a lousy bank account instead of some good investment, it still looks to me like it only costs about $120-$150 to get a $250 iPod Mini.

    As far as the psuedo-pyramid free iPod schemes go, they checked them out on The Screen Savers. Kevin Rose and Alex Albrecht both tried it, as did Alex's girlfriend. They all received their iPods. Kevin and Alex might have been recognized and treated specially, but there was nothing special about Alex's girlfriend, so it seemed that it really did work.

    1. Re:Citibank by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 1

      But how much will the iPod mini cost in a year's time?

      --
      Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    2. Re:Citibank by templest · · Score: 0

      You have to also notice, this isn't some huge sacrifice you're making. Those $120 or so fees you pay to the bank are pretty much the same fees you'd pay for any other. Stocking your account up with $2,500? Sure, I already have that. Pay at least 2 bills online? Hey! I do that already! :D

      See my point? Switch banks and get a free iPod, and if you don't like the bank, after a year you can always switch back.

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    3. Re:Citibank by SoupaFly · · Score: 1

      Dude, seriously, if you're paying $10/month to your bank -- find another financial institution. I haven't paid a monthly fee for banking services in like 10 years.

    4. Re:Citibank by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Neither checking or savings accounts can be considered investments. I assume you didn't direct deposit a pay check, so you had to pay some extra fees.

      Also given the minimum $2,500 you have to put into the account, the bank is making a substantial amount of interest on your money for a year. And also, the bank probably only paid $125 for the iPod, so they probably came out ahead.

    5. Re:Citibank by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      most pyramid schemes work as long as you do exactly what's needed for them to work, in this case, get the five referrals and get them to give their contacts to five companies..

      all pyramids that are run by any competent people always 'work', as long as they can. the cleverly built even give a fair share of the circulated money to the guys running it legally.

      "easy second income! fill letters at home" works too, as long as you can make it work by getting other suckers to join.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Moderations are for the content of the posting, not the signatures. If you don't like what you see in signatures, turn signatures off in your Slashdot settings.

    1. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but if you mark something as troll based on the sig, and it turns up in metamod, it'll be voted unfair unless the post actually is a troll, because it is unfair.

      See? You lose.

      Idiot.

    2. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by droleary · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't like what you see in signatures, turn signatures off in your Slashdot settings.

      I'll second that; I turned off sigs years ago. Further, there is already a system in place to mark when a person is an ass-stick: foe them. Moderating individual articles for some unseen sig offense will likely have me hitting the Unfair radio button as well.

    3. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says I'll moderate it Troll? Redundant and Overrated has Always worked for me =)

    4. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I've hit the foe button more times in this article than I have for at least a month.

    5. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by daniil · · Score: 1

      So, erm...anyone want a gmail invite? :H

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    6. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by NaCl · · Score: 1

      If you don't like what you see in signatures, turn signatures off in your Slashdot settings

      If I don't like your sig, I'll just add you to my foes (mod -6), since I don't want to see your sig, not all sigs. BTW, your sig just got you one more foe.

      --
      I shot the sheriff
    7. Re:And I'll metamoderate that as UNFAIR by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Not if they mod down with "Overrated".

      Underrated/Overrated moderations don't get metamoderated. This results them being used as "+1 Popular" and "-1 Unpopular" mods where the moderators know it wouldn't stand up to metamoderation.

  45. Re:Read this carefully O/T by tonsofpcs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Pacifica Rocks!
    BTW, without Pacifica, we wouldn't have ever contested the FCC censorship crap, then again, without them we wouldn't have had George Carlin's filthy words being THE LIST of words we can't say............

  46. Re:How to get a free ipod, in 5 easy steps by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

    Umm, you forgot step 0. Find a store that sells ipods that doesn't keep them in a locked cabinet.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  47. worst by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    The worst of it is within small digital circles of people.

    I go to a 600 student art school and one of the idiots who I'm none too fond of spammed his link in all student email. I sent out a rather polite and intelligent email explaining why he shouldn't, how it was impolite, and what would happen when EVERYBODY started doing that.

    I got a very nasty reply, but pretty much everybody else in school agreed with me.

    The best policy for getting rid of these kind of scams is to create policies against them. They ARE technically spam.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  48. Well by SlashdotMeNow · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new iPod sharing overlords.

  49. Get over it you crybabies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, I have done the free ipods deal through Gratis. IT WORKS. I just got my free iPod the week before last. It was brand new, factory sealed.

    1) It's not a pyramid scheme (pyramid schemes are illegal, and Gratis at least is above board and totally legal)

    2) You can technically get one for "free" depending upon the offer you choose. Some offers do cost you money, but in no case will any offer ever cost more than a few dollars or 1 month of Netflix of Blockbuster.

    3) You DON'T have to rat out your friends. Using your sig line on forums is in no way ratting out your friends. If someone clicks on your link, that's THEIR choice. You aren't force feeding this to anyone. Gratis used to have a "refer" a friend program where you could mass email people with your link, "friends", but they have elimintated this feature as of about 5 or 6 weeks ago.

    4) It took me a total of 6 weeks from start to finish to get my iPod. I completed one offer and had 8 (you only need 5) unknown people complete offers for me.

    5) My spam has gone up 0 because of doing this. Some of the offers you can sign up for might send you a ton of email, but they have easy opt out options, your name is NOT being sold from what I can tell. I might be wrong about that point, but at this point it has not become an issue at all.

    I found the entire process painless and easy. And now I am grooving my 20GB iPod.

    1. Re:Get over it you crybabies! by nolife · · Score: 1

      Seminar speaker: First, let me assure you that this is not one of those shady pyramid schemes you've been hearing about. No sir. Our model is the trapezoid!

      Taken from the Simpsons episode 8F10, I Married Marge

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  50. most consumer goods.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ....are sold to anyone "you" as joe consumer as being the bottom part of a pyramid. You have the producer/manufacturer, the wholesaler, the jobber, the distributor, etc, down to the retail store, each taking a cut, and that doesn't count the shipping guys,k insurance guys, accountant guys, tax boys, yada yada, who are always in the mix as well. This isn't a whole lot different, just using sources that aren't normally inside the pyramid, in a slightly different way. And as to consumers paying the cost,sure they do, no argument, same as you do anyway for every single thing that's advertised, no matter how it's advertised, the expense is shared by all the purchasers eventually.

    I haven't done or responded to any of the ipod offers, but I don't see it as much different than recommending a link to your favorite web vendor to go buy something, whether you get something or not from the deal, not in the grand scheme of things anyway. As to the privacy factor, you can't ever use a credit card for any purchase then, could you, either online or in meatspace, nor a personal check, it would have to be cash-ola in person at a brick and mortar store for every purchase of a good or service rendered to avoid "losing privacy".

  51. A slight rewording... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Government pension schemes (going all the way back to Social Security) were based around the fact that the first participants seemed to recieve whatever was promised (a quick retirment, "free" medical, etc). This was the bait used to lure in the next generation of suckers.

    Know what "exponential growth" means? ;)"

  52. Someone covered this a while back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  53. Ditto! by AvantLegion · · Score: 1, Funny
    I totally hate that free iPod crap.

    1. Re:Ditto! by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      To the brainiacs modding "Overrated" - please consult the .sig so you get the joke.

    2. Re:Ditto! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mod it -1, Bonehead instead, for having it in his sig in the firstplace.

      (Yeah yeah. -1, Flamebait. Bite me)

    3. Re:Ditto! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and...?

      the joke is overrated. get over yourself you spamming cunt.

  54. How to make it work by MaelstromX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are now freeipods, freeflatscreens, freedesktops, and more others than I can count. Obviously in a pyramid scheme like this a tiny fraction of participants receive the products, but there is a way to cheat the system (in, as far as I can tell, a completely legitimate and legal way).

    If a group of 10 people or so got together and each chose an item they wanted (say I want a flatscreen, a friend wants an iPod, another wants a desktop pc, another wants a PS2), each of us could initiate an account and, with full participation of each of the other members of our "group", all of us would be able to receive one of the items that we wanted.

    This only works if people have not yet signed up for the programs as Gratis tends to figure out if people make duplicate registrations.

    So...anyone wanna jump on board?

  55. I can only wonder... by adolfojp · · Score: 1

    I wonder hoy many people will change their sigs to post on this article... or perhaps even permanently.

    It is always hard to have one of your habits criticized HARD by your peers.

    Cheers,
    Adolfo

  56. Re:How this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have been spaming here for the better part of this year and you still haven't got your items. please just stop.

  57. RE: Time is money by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep! When I first heard about the Gratis, Inc. offer to send a free iPod, I figured "Hey, I'll at least give it a try and see exactly what they're really asking me to do."

    I got through the majority of the thing before I realized it was going to be a huge waste of my time to proceed further. At the beginning, they don't really make it clear that you need to get at least 5 referrals to *sign up for the offers they're emailed* (and I believe, keep them for at least 30 days, too). They make you think that YOU simply have to do so with one (of many) offers you click through, and then give them 5 valid email addresses of friends.

    From my browsing through all the "trial offers", I began to realize that almost all are a royal pain in the butt to get cancelled after you sign up. I might be willing to go through the hassle myself, but I sure don't want to make 5 of my friends do so (if I could even get 5 of them to sign up for these offers in the first place!).

    I think one of the "simplest" ones to cancel was the offer to sign up with AOL, and as most of us probably already know - that's not usually the easiest thing in the world to cancel. (At the very least, you're gonna be waiting on hold for 20 or 30 minutes until you talk to some cust. service clown who keeps trying to give you more "free hours" rather than just cancel you.)

    Worse yet, so many other people already know about these deals, you end up emailing friends who are already trying to get the free iPod themselves.

  58. Honestly, this is filed wrong. by Harker · · Score: 1

    /. needs a category called "Duh!" for articles like this.

    I will not even give my zip code at a store register. I always ask if they're going to give me a discount with it, and the answer is always no.

    I can even remember when this started. The first time I was asked for one I spent 10 min in front of the clerk, who insisted I must give one to her. Granted, she was just following orders, but it took her way too long to call a manager over.

    Any more, if you decline, they either enter in something and continue on, or just hit a key or two and continue. It's not as much fun any more.

    --
    When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    1. Re:Honestly, this is filed wrong. by dougmc · · Score: 1
      I will not even give my zip code at a store register.
      You'd be amazed how many people live in the 90210 zip code ...

      If you need a full address, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 is a good choice. As is 1060 W. Addison Street, Chicaco, IL 60613. For a phone number, 555-1212 is a good choice.

    2. Re:Honestly, this is filed wrong. by Roryking · · Score: 1

      No joke. At Kroger, ask them to look up your plus card by phone number. 817-555-5555 works just great. Add your area code prefix for fun, maybe it works, maybe it doesn't.

    3. Re:Honestly, this is filed wrong. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      As is 1060 W. Addison Street, Chicaco, IL 60613.

      "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses."

      "Hit it."

  59. Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by jmcmunn · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am not trying to be a troll or anything here, just to add my personal experience.

    I signed up for the Gratis freeipods.com site a few months back, and successfully recieved my iPod. Visit my site below if you want pics, no direct links because my server will die. I have also done several other free items, including a free iRiver, $275 cash, a PS2 and a Harmony 688 remote worth $150-$200. I'm currently working on a photo ipod (see my sig to help me) and only need two more people.

    So yes, these sites work. What's the catch? Time. It takes a decent amount of time to get started on these deals. Most people I ask to help me tell me it is a scam, but they're dead wrong. It's not a scam for any one person in particular. The companies I have dealt with (PrizeCube.com, Offercentric, and Gratis) are 100% legit. But they do make money off me, and I have no problem with that.

    I would like to say, however, that these three companies have not (to the best of my knowledge) sold my email or personal information. I have not gotten any spam in my inbox, nor have I gotten any increase in junk mail at my home address. The email account I used for all of the sites is a brand new Gmail account, and I only get one or two spam each week there. I have another Gmail account used for online purchases, subscription sites, and random other online crap...it gets about 20 spam every day. Thankfully, Gmail has a really good spam filter, and only 1 or 2 get through the filter at all. Also, I would like to say that there are some worthwhile deals on the sites worth trying. I signed up for Audible.com and Blockbuster online, both of which I still use. They are great sites, and great offers if you ask me. On the other hand, I cancelled a lot of deals that were not for me, but I gave them a shot. That's one important rule you should be ready to follow if you try these deals: Try the offer, and don't cancel the next day. They check, and will disqualify you if they suspect you are trying to cheat the system. It's their right...it's in the TOS.

    When I started out on these deals, I spent about 30 minutes each night posting on random groups and forums advertising my links. That went pretty much nowhere, but it did get me my free iPod from Gratis after about 3 weeks (so about 10-15 hours total). So the return on my time was pretty low in most of your eyes...it is less than I make per hour at work, but it was more or less in the process of reading forums I would have read anyway (like here at Slashdot) because I had the links in my sigs.

    The "profit" started coming in once I started working on some of the other deals. I was getting hits at my web site by then, because it was also in my sig. I whipped up a web page, and pretty soon I was well on my way to some more stuff. I'd say another 5-10 hours and I had my free iRiver and my free PS2. Since then, I try to never advertise in any way other than my sig on a forum site, or on my personal web site. Rarely do I draw attention to my links, and no one has to read my site, but once they are there they will more or less be reading about my free deals.

    So now, there is little to no work on my part. I spend 5 minutes each day checking my email for people contacting me about the deals, and I spend 5 more minutes posting on my website updating my deals and whatnot. So now, I can honestly say that the ~$1500 worth or stuff I have gotten is well worth the 30 or so hours I have spent on it. It's nothing to write home about I guess, but I have never felt obligated to work on it. It's just something I do every day or two at this point, and I enjoy it.

    So would I recommend signing up for a site or two? Yeah, if you want to spend some time on it. But you'll start to break even on the time/money tradeoff if you do more sites. If you try only one, it may or may not be worth your time. It would be faster for some people to go get a part time job at Best Buy and use the employee discount to just buy an iPod. These deals are not for everyone

    1. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by wackysootroom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got my Ipod and Flatscreen too. I used 2 disposable email addresses that I put into a special mailbox with procmail. To this day, I still haven't had a single piece of spam or any telemarketing calls. I don't get any more junk mail than usual either.

      So what did I get? $800 worth of free electronics for about an hour of work and so did 3 of my friends.

    2. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by nativespeaker · · Score: 1

      So would I recommend signing up for a site or two? Yeah, if you want to spend some time on it.

      Tell you what -- I'll give you a buck if you wipe off my windshield for me. Think that's insulting? At least you'd be working, rather than begging people to inconvenience themselves for your personal benefit.

    3. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Anyone can take a picture of an iPod and claim they got it for free.

    4. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      don't mix FREE with something non-free.

      even gratis's name is a scam. they're not donating the ipods to you(gratis), they're selling them to you in exchange to something(signups etc).

      (and pyramids 'always' work if you're on the top, for one reason or another. the thing is just that for that 1500$ have 15000$(if the rate is let's say 10%) been scammed from somewhere, be they the companies that are customers of gratis to get subscribers or other people joining under you who fail to get enough legit signups - the bottom line is that they're scammed from _somewhere_).

      of course most people(and companies too probably) think they'll end up on top of the scam which is why even straight ponzis thrive on the internet so well(they just tell people that they got a bistro or whatever to make the 2.5% daily intrest possible - and the stupid fucks either believe them or, more often than not, think they can get on top of the scam).

      it should be illegal to promote gambling as 'free'.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      So essentially, you have become a spammer by posting crap to random internet groups and forums? You are no better than the spammers. They have recruited you and you don't even realize it.

    6. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Yes, they have recruited me to advertise. And I am guessing that you are wearing branded clothing right now as well. Nike shoes perhaps? A Gap shirt, or perhaps Polo or something a little more mature. Levis jeans? The point is, my subtle advertising is not in your face bugging you all the time. Just ignore my sig like you ignore every pair of jeans or Gap shirt you see. Advertising is everywhere in every aspect of your life.

      I never send unsolicited emails, and I never overtly beg for referrals. I thought in this case it was appropriate to mention I had a referral link in my sig. And as far as other forums, the sigs are just as discrete. Sometimes with nothing more than a link to my page.

    7. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      No that's not insulting, but I would turn you down. It's not because of the kind of work you offer me, its the money/time benefit on my part. I don't need a dollar badly enough to want to spend 2 minutes cleaning your car.

      And I do believe you can blame the moderators for all of the spamming links going on here. They knew damn well what was going to happen when they posted this article. If you read to the bottom of my post, you made it through a lot more than a simple spam. And I clearly point out that it is more of a time/cost issue if you want to try these deals. I'm not begging for your referral here, that's what my site is for. And yes, it serves a single purpose and it works quite well for me. My personal site is for my personal benefit, let's be clear about that. Begging on Slashdot is an entirely different behavior, and I try to avoid it.

    8. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You found 3 people to sign up and went through all the offers you were required to, signed up for the required amount, either bought from the signups or cancelled to avoid the charges and then set up and created the email accounts and procmail all with only 1 hour of work? Complete bullshit.

    9. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit? Did it take you longer? If it took you more time you're spending time spamming or trying to cheat the system.

      Set up 2 new accounts on FreeBSD Mail Server - 2 minutes.

      Create procmail recipes to put messages from gratis in special mailbox. test recipe - 10 minutes

      Sign up with gratis and do the free infone and ebay offer (no cancellation needed) - 30 minutes.

      Email my list of friends about the deal - 10 minutes.

      Total time invested: ~52 minutes. I also put my referral link in my .sig on 2 bulletin boards and I figure this may have taken a minute or so. After telling my friends and changing my .sig I just sat back and waited about a week until my referrals were complete.

      It took over 2 months to get my ipod and TV but they did arrive.

    10. Re:Yes, these deals are legit...if you spend time by nativespeaker · · Score: 1

      Begging on Slashdot is an entirely different behavior, and I try to avoid it.

      Well, if I read your .sig correctly, you don't try very hard. Maybe if you stick with it you can work yourself up to Cialis ads...you know, really think big.

  60. Why not use a Conga line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate asking my friends to sign up for crap like this, so I joined http://www.smartcongaline.com/. It took a little while, but I got my ipod and I didn't have to nag anybody I know.

    1. Re:Why not use a Conga line? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      I hate asking my friends to sign up for crap like this, so I joined http://www.smartcongaline.com/. It took a little while, but I got my ipod and I didn't have to nag anybody I know.

      Yeap.. I second that. I stopped whoring around on /. after signing up for smartcongaonline =)

    2. Re:Why not use a Conga line? by jamesbuko · · Score: 0

      I hate asking my friends to sign up for crap like this, so I joined http://www.smartcongaline.com/. It took a little while, but I got my ipod and I didn't have to nag anybody I know.
      I just bought an IPOD. So I wont signup for crap like this and it didn't took a little while.

  61. yep by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 0

    Someone makes money, but if you jump through their hoops, you will get a free iPod, if you stick with it (free shipping too). Granted it was easier in the early days (I think I may have been one of the first with it in my /. sig) as I got my signups in 4 days. I have it in my sig now to help those that signed up through me; I think it's only fair. I participated in a trial I was interested in (stamps.com) and found that it was windows client based, with no Mac or Linux option. I called to cancel, told them to make a web option (the rep agreed, said they were looking into it, and that was that. Look, I didn't think I'd fall for a thing like this, but hey, I did, and I got a free iPod out of it. I would not have paid for the iPod, it's too much for me, but to get it free, cool!

    Now, as for marketing, I use my own mailserver, so I made some dummy aliases that got spammed right away. No matter, I used them to help my Spamassassin rules, and then just cut them off when I was done. Yes, I told the others the same thing, so there would be no surprises. Would I do the same for the other free offers out there? (computer/pvr/money/etc) prob not, just cause I don't have the time to spend on it, and a new Dell isn't as 'sexy' while requiring 10 recs. But people calling me scum and other names just don't know the whole story; if you're not interested move along, go back to spamming the GNAA posts and all the other crap that's filled up /. posts of late.

    Now, back to my 20G iPod...

    BCb

    1. Re:yep by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 0

      Oh, and for the 'personal information' I gave up, it was actually all fake, less the address, which was my old work address. I felt somewhat bad about that, but hey, they get their $ from whomever I did my trial from, so they didn't seem to care.

      CB

    2. Re:yep by arose · · Score: 1
      Granted it was easier in the early days
      What do you expect, it is a pyramid scheme afterall.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  62. Re:How this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see what you're doing there.

    You dirty dirty little sly poster ;)

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Saving money vs doing something cool by infonography · · Score: 1

    These nifty little DIY projects are not to save money. Most IT people (meaning US on Slashdot) are both addicted to gadgets and generally have disposable cash. That's not the reason we are interested in them. We may do them and it's for the fun of it not the pricetag. If we wanted to save money we would be ranting on a Mother Jones website.
    After all it's News for NERDS!!!

    Honestly, when did you last see a Pumpkin webserver for sale?

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:Saving money vs doing something cool by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Honestly, when did you last see a Pumpkin webserver for sale?

      Well, I could believe a Halloween pumpkin casemod...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Saving money vs doing something cool by eno2001 · · Score: 1
      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  65. I got my iPod by digitalgimpus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I seriously got mine from freeipods.com. I documented the entire thing (play by play) on my blog:

    Free iPod Posts

    That query will display just my free iPod posts. I posted as quick as I can, so the dates are very accurate to the actual events. Even a few photos posted at the end.

    I did sign up for a freeflatscreen, though haven't completed the requirements for that one (if you want to see blog posts for free flat screens... help out :-D ).

    All I can say is: I got mine. I have no idea about everyone else who participated, but mine came to my door. So for me, it worked.

    Just my $0.02

  66. And /. is in on it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe the owners of this site are in with the scammers! They call the guys legit! It's so hard to build credibility, then they throw it all out with one story.

    1. Re:And /. is in on it! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      " I can't believe the owners of this site are in with the scammers! They call the guys legit!"

      I don't know what site you refer to as "this site" but no where in the post does it say the free ipods links are legit, they're simple pointing to a NY Times article examining the phenomenon.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  67. Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Physical Property=Time * Effort.

    Intellectual Property=Time * Effort.

    I know you all would like those equations to be different, but so far despite all efforts you've failed.

    1. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Romancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One Flaw,

      Physical Property=Time * Effort * Material.

      Intellectual Property=Time * Effort.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    2. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Spyffe · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Property is what you can lose. If you create a sculpture, you can lose it; if you paint a painting, you can lose it. "Intellectual Property," on the other hand, is the "right" to tell other people they may not produce certain things.

      The market sets a value on that which is scarce - i.e. what a person cannot have if someone else has it. "Intellectual property" has a value only because governments are letting people and companies buy and sell the right to restrict what people say and do.

      This is unconscionable. I don't care how much people earn by doing it, it's still wrong. Restricting people's rights to life and liberty held up the American South's cotton economy until the mid-1800s. Restricting people's right to free speech and movement held up the Soviet Russian economy.

      I don't care how much "time and effort" somebody puts in to get the right to muzzle me. I still won't be muzzled. Anyone who thinks gagging the public is "fair compensation" for a creative act doesn't deserve to have free speech.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    3. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i suppose all those neat little circuit boards and such can be created with ONLY time and effort. ie no materials.

      you are just stupid thats alll

    4. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by lokedhs · · Score: 2, Informative
      Another flaw:

      physical property = time * effort + material

      This makes the material bit kinda irrelevant to the entire equation, and thefefore can be ignored for the purposes of the grandfather post.

    5. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      Physical Property = Time + Effort + Materials + Equipment/Facilities Usage + Loss from Not Executing Better Alternative Uses of Resources

      Intellectual Property = Time + Effort + Equipment/Facilities Usage + Loss from Not Executing Better Alternative Uses of Resources

    6. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      physical property = time * effort + material

      This makes the material bit kinda irrelevant to the entire equation, and thefefore can be ignored for the purposes of the grandfather post.


      I think it is more like...

      physical property = time * (effort + material)

    7. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      Intellectual Property=Time * Effort

      Actually, there's material there, too. For example, the computer I'm typing this post on. Or the paper an author uses to mail in a manuscript. Or the canvas used by a painter.

      Bascially, IP cannot exist without a recording medium. That's why some people get all pissy over DRM, DMCA, etc. The issue is not regulating IP but its media.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    8. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Wow, a bunch of people are submitting "improvements" on the time*effort*material expression. Let me argue why I think it's perfect the way it is.

      If Property=Time*Effort*Material, then if you double time, the property doubles (this makes sense). If you double effort, the property doubles (this makes sense). If you double material, the property doubles (this makes sense).

      Basically, if you want to combine different quantities in such a way that each one is equally important regardless of its relative scale, you multiply them.

    9. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I think the formula should be:

      Physical property *(quantity) = time*effort + material*quantity.

      Also the *quantity should be multiplied into the time and effort somewhere - even if it is machine made - there is a lot more time and effort put into making 1000 of a widget then just 1 of a widget. Its complex - but hey the above examples ar egood enough - :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Spyffe · · Score: 1

      You can still have your "free speech" within the limits of "not yelling fire in a crowded theatre" or plagerizing others "free speech".

      Speech that is restricted is not free.

      Perhaps it is unjustified to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theatre; the danger to people's lives may justify that restriction. So the government, to protect the lives of its citizens, restricts my free speech.

      What's different about copyright is that it gives anybody a blank check to restrict speech and the press, effectively commoditizing a basic right. The US Constitution recognized that this had very limited use, qualifying it by stating that a limited copyright should only be used to "promote science and useful Arts."

      The Constitutional Convention should have realized that if you allow even the most limited restrictions on a right, that right will be further infringed as long as there are moneyed interests lobbying for such infringement.

      Hence, at the behest of IP clearinghouses like Disney, copyright is neither limited (the Supreme Court has held that repeated extension of copyright does not violate the "limited" clause) nor limited to science and useful arts (novels, movies, and songs are now covered).

      Your "specific expression" logic is vague. Do you mean I can't take a book that contains a piece of text from a bookstore without paying? That's covered by common law. But I can neither rewrite that book nor make a movie or radio-play out of it without running into copyright issues. "Specific expressions" are clearly a lot less specific than you seem to think.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    11. Re:Read this carefully-Failed reality. by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      Not really. The cost of the material doesn't go up just because it takes lonker to make.

  68. Something is fishy about all the happy customers . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There seem to be lot of suspiciously satisfied customers just jumping out of the woodwork about how happy they are they got their iPod. Funny, how I didn't see any postings from unhappy folks.

    Back in the day, before I went on to better, more mature things, I ran some porn sites. To get traffic, I sent about 100 spams every day by hand to usenet groups using AOL. The spams said they were giving a pirated login/password to a porn site link that was included.

    Of course, the web-form that opened was bogus, people could have typed in anything and gotten to the porn. But, thinking it was a stolen password, people jumped on it. I was making 3000 or so a month at the peak, all from the same 100 or so daily usenet spams. For some reason, (maybe guilt?) people who used the "free" password were much much more likely to click on the legit banners in my site.

    Eventuanlly, after the the banner affiliate programs got complaints from the usenet police (a singularly dedicated band of activists that have way too much time on their hands) about me, I stopped getting paid. Sluggish AOL even noticed their complaints, and my accounts kept getting turned off. By then I was making much more money at a real job, but the experience a very valuable look at the dark side of net and human psychology.

    It would be really interesting to look at how many of these slashdotters posting about how they got a "free iPod" somehow all set-up their accounts in the last couple of hours or so ... Also, those folks with sigs linking to the iPod offer will also have realized the potential this story offers.

  69. Poster probably has other "motives" by failedlogic · · Score: 1, Redundant

    After reading through the thread a few things become apparent:

    1) For some this free iPod stuff works.
    2) For others, the cueues are too long and companies have to decide who is more deserving.
    3) Some posters are discrediting these companies saying they have bad motives.

    Could it be that if #1 works, given #2 is short enough, that accomplishing #1 and #2 can be done by using #3 on a /. news post??

    1. Re:Poster probably has other "motives" by EllF · · Score: 1

      That's "queues", cowboy.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  70. having trouble guessing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Say what you want, but Free XXX is always good. Unless you're... well, you know...
    • needing to work?
    • religious?
    • preferring to think about your partner in lawful marriage?
    • wanting to use your brain for a weekend project?
    • under a vow of celibacy?
    • already worn out from too many one-night-stands in one night?
  71. That would be a great place to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    because you don't have to do a damn thing! Sorry, I'm just bitter after four trips to an Apple Store for nothing. I bought an iBook in August and after the keyboard quit, and all the Apple Store employees would do was ship it back to Apple. That was the first week of October, and it's still not back! They had a replacement keyboard in stock, and it would have only taken five minutes to replace it. Instead, I'm out a laptop for over two months and approaching on three. Thanks for nothing!

    The first week of December, I bought a PowerBook in the Apple Store in Lennox Mall in Atlanta, GA, USA, because I need a laptop for a two week trip for work. The CDROM didn't work out of the box. I got the same crap from Apple. They wouldn't replace it with a new laptop, and I couldn't do without it for months, so I paid the $279 open box fee to swap it out with a new one. I'm going to fight them through my credit card company. They're a bunch of damned crooks. I thought Circuit City was horrible (and they are), but these guys are worse. They just don't care.

    The worst part of the deal is that I almost had my boss talked into replacing our Sony Vaio trouble-makers, err, laptops with iBooks. After he's seen firsthand the horrible service at Apple Stores, he's decided we're going to buy more Sony's running XP. Damn it. I almost had something easier to maintain on all of our laptops than XP. I'm stuck for another three years with spending 80+ hours a week removing spyware and browser hijackers. I'm VERY angry about that.

    1. Re:That would be a great place to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would have said you had great service and everything went fine with the folks at the Apple store, you would get a +5 insightful/interesting. Since your comments were anti Apple, they will be ignored or labeled as -1 offtopic/troll.

      Sad but true...

    2. Re:That would be a great place to work... by Ballresin · · Score: 1

      I work for Apple at an Apple Store.

      Your laptops should have been replaced quickly. They weren't. So call a higher-up and complain. I happen to know how these things work. You complain to every single person in the store until someone makes it happen.

      However; you're probably a dickhead. And if you are, I can easily understand why they'd put you through hell. Bad luck falls on some people, and Apple tries to be expedient with requests for new hardware, but you're not the only one, so be patient.

      As far as you choosing XP for a computing environment for your boss rather than OS X.... you're a fucking moron and you know it. That's not Apple's fault. Own your own shit. That's why you run Apple in the first place.

      But what do I know? I'm just one of the top guys in my region.

      --
      I got nothin'.
    3. Re:That would be a great place to work... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      lol... you're a BRILLIANT prick.

      --
      Fuck it
    4. Re:That would be a great place to work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you're a fucking moron and you know it

      Wow, an Apple employee calls me a moron for saying I wanted to switch to OSX. Wow, that shows just how bad a company is when their own employees call people morons for wanting to use their products. That sounds like a Dilbert cartoon.

    5. Re:That would be a great place to work... by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1
      Ballresin wrote:

      I work for Apple at an Apple Store.

      Your laptops should have been replaced quickly. They weren't. So call a higher-up and complain. I happen to know how these things work. You complain to every single person in the store until someone makes it happen.

      OK so far.

      However; you're probably a dickhead. And if you are, I can easily understand why they'd put you through hell.

      My, aren't we jumping to conclusions rather further than is healthy for us. Nowhere did he say anything that led me to believe he was unreasonable or abusive to the store employees. If that's your default mindset regarding customers, perhaps you should seek alternate employment, because your idea of "customer service" is sadly lacking. Besides that, even dickhead customers are customers, and are entitled to a basic level of service that this guy is apparently not getting.

      Bad luck falls on some people, and Apple tries to be expedient with requests for new hardware, but you're not the only one, so be patient.

      If this is a situation where demand for spare parts and replacements is that high, Apple better get on the ball and meet the demand, or guys like this one will (justifiably) flame them to a crisp in public. If it's not high, Apple and its agents have even less excuse.

      If I buy a new car, a purchase of the same order of magnitude for most people as an iBook, and the power windows suddenly fail to work on it one morning two months later, you better believe that dealer is going to give me a free loaner with a smile, an apology, and a promise (that they'll keep if they're smart) that my car will be ready for me within a reasonable, mutually-agreed-on period. To do otherwise, except in situations that are genuinely beyond the dealer's control (like the factory that makes the windows blowing up), is to invite me to call up every media outlet in a 50-mile radius and let their consumer reporter know what kind of service buyers at that dealership are getting.

      As far as you choosing XP for a computing environment for your boss rather than OS X.... you're a fucking moron and you know it. That's not Apple's fault. Own your own shit. That's why you run Apple in the first place.

      Had you bothered to read his comment rather than quickly (and badly) skim it, you would have noted that he was trying to get the existing install of XP replaced, and his boss, after seeing his difficulties getting service from Apple, nixed that idea.

      That, by the way, is a constantly recurring theme I've seen in the neo-Jobs era of Apple: doing less for fewer people, more slowly, whenever possible. Jobs' dislike of giving customers options that will just "confuse" them is legendary and goes all the way back to the Lisa, and measures taken on his watch to reduce the quantity and quality of Apple's support have been manifest and got Apple slapped down at least once by the FTC (the 1-800-SOS-APPL fiasco).

      But what do I know?

      Indeed.

      I'm just one of the top guys in my region.

      One of the top guys in what? Being an obnoxious prick?

      --
      -- Old Man Kensey
  72. I'll stick with my... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Funny

    FreeDryerLint.info

    I created this site to put in my sig on various sites after getting annoyed by all the freeipod referal links)

    1. Re:I'll stick with my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, have you received your free dryer lint. Or is it a scam?

      I received my free ipod months ago. Have fun with your dryer lint.

    2. Re:I'll stick with my... by lavaface · · Score: 1

      I looked all over your site but couldn't find out where to sign up. Little help?

    3. Re:I'll stick with my... by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      OK, gotta hand it to ya, you outdid me!

      Good job! :-D

  73. Read with no [idea if It'll continue being "free"] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If enough people start using bugmenot, these bastards just might stop requiring us to give them our life history* to access a bit of information."

    Or simply require that you become a paying customer before showing you the goods. You know, like a regular newspaper would.

    *Life history. Who would have though exaggeration would be so effective? BTW You give as much when you subscribe to a newspaper/magazine. Are you outraged now?

  74. Re: Time is money by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried creating 6 e-mail accounts for you and your 5 'friends'?

  75. Sell your soul for an iPod, but you still get it. by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 1

    Why is everyone so hardcore against getting these free iPods? Ok, so you pay your time instead of money. No one's fooling me, but what's wrong with it?

    Fine, I made an email address specifically to receive spam from these companies. You know what? I don't even get spam from them. I get more spam from Barnes and Noble than I ever got from Gratis or their affiliates.

    You sign up for an offer you don't want, and you cancel and it doesn't cost you anything! Boo freaking hoo, what are you whining about. Get your friends to do the same, and you get some free hardware. Don't bitch about the macroscopic scale how do they make money.... The point is, if you do your part, they do theirs. I've personally seen people with devices they've received. It's not a scam, and they're not fooling me.

    Fine, it's not free, it's a legitimate business trade. You generate commissions for other people, and they generate hardware for you.
    If you want to learn more, click her for and xbox
    or click here. It's a great system, give it a whirl

    --
    Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
    "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
  76. Yup, it's a scam by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    A post from some random guy with two pseudo-anonymous friends who claim to have been burned by this scam counts for more to me than a thousand rebuttals from people with "free iPod" links in their sigs. To put it bluntly, they have no obvious reason to lie. You do.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:Yup, it's a scam by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Not really. I couldnt give less of a shit if you click my link or not. I have over thirty referrals from slashdot, and hardly a one of them bothered to complete an offer. I have my 5 referrals, done by my friends and family, and frankly dont need you.

      So, no, I don't have any reason to lie whatsoever.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  77. Kickbacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of these free offers that you sign up for in order to get your free ipod give a kick back to the company that got you to sign up (most are 10 bucks).

    If you do the math they don't make any money unless someone signs up but doesn't complete the cycle. If everyone where to complete the scheme they won't make a dime. Good Luck!

  78. Re: Time is money by kinzillah · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, but the hard part is creating the 5 street addresses, birth certificates and credit cards.

    --
    Douglas P. Price
  79. Read with no registration-Hermits fail to register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how does any of the above uniquely identify you?

    There's paranoid, and there's PARANOID.

  80. How convenient by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

    "Just a reminder: If it sounds to good to be true, it is."

    I'm very pleased to know that my sense of the goodness of something and its likelihood is 100% reliable. On your recommendation, I plan to hire myself out for feasibility studies ordinarily done by corporations and governments.

    With my preternatural ability to tell whether something is possible purely based on my own limited life experience, I can make a lot of money! Feasibility studies usually cost millions of dollars because of the amount of research involved to determine the chances of success. I can charge just 10% of the usual fee and still be one of the richest people on the planet.

    Wait... this ability sounds too good to be true...

  81. Pyramid **SELLING** by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Each of the players you mention in making, selling and delivering a widget "adds value", yes even the accoutant. What happens with pyramid selling is that the retail store has been changed into a pyramid and the extra layers add no value to the widget. The many "retailers" at the bottom are screwed by the few at the top and that is why it is illegal in most of the western world. You could argue that understanding and applying 8th grade maths for everybody would achive the same results as prohibition.

    You are correct about the free-ipod, it is not a "pyramid scheme". The only thing that seems even remotely like a pyramid is the way the ipod people collect emails. If you "complete the offer" (buy something) you are not stuck with unwanted goods that you have to sell to another sucker at an even more inflated price (like the infamous Amway of old). Rather you give them a list of (willing?) contacts for thier mailing list. I assume they are doing it to reach as many people as possible but it wont last since the email pyramid will soon become staurated and they will start a new one with a different name and prize. It is nothing more than an advertising gimmick and adverts pay for all sorts of "free" things from slashdot to ipods. If your friends give all your details out without your knowlage then your real problem is that your friends can't be trusted. It is kind of ironic that with the use of lots of "junk@dont.care.com" accounts the people most hurt are the "free" email providers who are, in part, payed for by adverts.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  82. It works... so far. by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Do I have my free iPod yet? No. But, that's not their fault. I just haven't gotten my five referrals yet.

    When I joined, I signed up for that BMG Music service, which I've been happy with. (Incidentally, BMG also has a quasi-pyramid scheme- if I refer someone else, I get 6 CDs for the price of one.) However, even after two months passed, the membership was never recorded by freeipods.com. After a few e-mails (the final 'responses' of which were a bit confusing) I was told to copy the 'Welcome to BMG Music' e-mail to the form and send it to them. I did so, and three days later my account reflected that I had completed my part of the offer.

    If they were into screwing over their customers, they probably would have led me along much longer, or just not credited my account. But after one or two e-mails, they did so obediently. This tells me they either want me to get five people, or that if I do get five people they will actually hold up their end and send me an iPod.

    Now I just have to find five suc- I mean, very good friends to complete offers.

    After that, I'm going for the free flat screen.

    (Yes, I realize what's in my .sig)

    1. Re:It works... so far. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      every pyramid scheme 'works' if you count it as working if you manage to find those referrals..

      and you're already on the low end of this pyramid scheme, time to look for the next one if you really think they're the way to go.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:It works... so far. by Arcturax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some people are even modding down folks with that in their .sig. I've metamodded those as fair as I personally think the .sig should not be a tool for spam. We deal with enough ads already, we certainly don't need to put up with them in every .sig.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  83. Read this carefully-Donationware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't think anyone who contributes their efforts will believe their work valueless."

    Here's what I would like to know. Were does the OSS contributors get the free food, housing, let alone the free transportation, zero taxes, etc? We all should be so "free".

  84. No freebie for you by no-freebie-for-u · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Simply put: there are no free lunches. IMO people that push this pseudo-free crap in their .sigs are leeches. That's why I created this account, to add those leeches to my enemies list and ask people with mod points to mod them down when justified.

    There's even one "thing" that is trading gmail accounts for signing up under his referral id. Sad.

    Please, everyone, stop pushing pseudo-free crap. And telling people to sign up and cancel right away to avoid credit card charges is fraud.

    1. Re:No freebie for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you to tell anyone what to do ? Are you our new moral overlord. I don't mind reading this stuff; although I would never turn in 5 of my friends to these bozos. That, however, has nothing to do with self appointed moralist overlords like yourself and Pat Robertson. Go find your own happiness in life and quit trying to dictate to others.

    2. Re:No freebie for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't like it? Don't listen to the guy. No one is forcing you to obey him are they?

  85. Re: Time is money by nuggetman · · Score: 1

    I think one of the "simplest" ones to cancel was the offer to sign up with AOL, and as most of us probably already know - that's not usually the easiest thing in the world to cancel. (At the very least, you're gonna be waiting on hold for 20 or 30 minutes until you talk to some cust. service clown who keeps trying to give you more "free hours" rather than just cancel you.)


    Tip from personal experience: cancel via fax. No muss no fuss, AOL account is gone after about 3 days

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  86. Not really. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    "No, but selling out 5 of your friends to get it does."

    Not if they're actually getting something for what they buy into the deal with.

    The best offer on the Gratis site is probably MyInks, which sells remanufactured inkjet cartridges, refill kits, and other consumables.

    Come ink refill time, it's reeeeal nice not to have to subsidize your printer company's printers sold at a loss by buying their overpriced ink.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Not really. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Not if they're actually getting something for what they buy into the deal with.

      Yes, but is it your right to decide what their info is worth? I'd be very upset personally if I found that one of my friends had given one of these scammers my email address. I guess it's worth it for sufficiently small values of "friend."

      I've been buying refill ink for years, I wasn't aware that I was supposed to be going through Gratis to get them, sorry.

  87. -1, trolling for a free ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You don't get it do you? Stop bothering us with your stupid freebie offers.

    -1 for being clueless.

  88. -1, for bringing google into your scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hello? McFly? Is there anyone in there? Your selling gmail accounts for referrals? I hope google finds out and cancels out your entire invite "tree". They've done it to others. And yes, I emailed them like I'm sure others have.

    Please repent now. -1 for .sig pollution.

    1. Re:-1, for bringing google into your scam by Saeger · · Score: 1

      If anyone reads this far down the thread and wants a FREE (no strings attached) GMail account, I've got 10 more to give away. Contact me at my yahoo address if you want one.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  89. You can make more people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    And it only takes about 9 months to make more people.

    I am sure there are lots of slashdotters ready to sign up for that program...

  90. Re:Read with no [idea if It'll continue being "fre by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

    BTW You give as much when you subscribe to a newspaper/magazine.

    Er, no. Not when I cruise down to my supermarket in my disguise, taking a 100-mile detour to ensure that I'm not being followed, driving my car with fake license plates and a stripped VIN, buy a magazine/newspaper, and pay with cash that has been altered to remove the little tiny RFID tags.
    BTW, the tin foil hat is getting hard to integrate with my disguise. Damned black ops making all the good disguises impossible to use... THOSE BASTARDS!

    Are you outraged now?

    Yes!!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
  91. Clueless, truly clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, I've read the article. You want people to:

    Sign up for some offer that involves them giving a company their credit card.

    Then you advise them to cancel said service purchase to avoid a charge so you can get something for free.

    Isn't that defrauding the company that you're whoring yourself to?

    To quote the Simpsons: "it's not a pyramid scheme, it's a trapezoid!"

  92. Want an iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GET A FRIGGIN' JOB!

  93. Free Viagara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consumer Research Corporation = SubscriberBase = Scott Richter

    He is responsible for most of the Viagra and Cialis spam in your mailbox.

  94. Get you free iPod here - the easy way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Click here, pay a small shipping fee of $249 and your free iPod mini will be shipped to you right away!

    Moral of the story: If you want something, buy it you cheap prick, don't beg like some highway offramp whore.

  95. How deliciously evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell out friends and family and get free stuff. How much more insidious can you get? A useful little test of the character of your friends, though. Ever wonder how those underground resistance guys in history end up exposed by friends and family? Ever wonder how they could sell out someone so close to 'em? Well here's your answer. People who sell me out at this trivial stage of the game can't be trusted.

  96. No, that's completely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Physical Property=Time * Effort * materials

    Intellectual Property=Time * Effort

    The fact is, if I write a piece of software for me, and keep it closed source, it takes X amount of time and effort. If I release the source code for it so other people can use it, it still only took me X amount of time and effort. There is no loss involved, I don't get less of my software, its not a tangible thing that has to be devided up.

  97. Re:Oh this old and boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit, I have cancelled AOL on two occassions with no problems other than a "one last pitch" or "free AOL for two months". I politely said no thank you and they politely said "okay, thanks for having been an AOL customer, have a good day". and no I don't think they got fired :P

  98. The only thing missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is the PIN to your ATM card. Of course if you're stupid enough to give out all that info getting it should be very easy.

    Mod the parent up.

  99. First by Cyclone_TBW · · Score: 0

    Purely for educational purposes only :-)

    --






    Click HERE
  100. So this guy goes into a bar ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    So this guy goes into a bar and sits down next to this nice, young woman. He says "Will you sleep with me for a free iPod?" She pauses, thinks about it, and says yes. Then he says "Will you sleep with me for $10?" She gets all pissed off and says "What do you think I am?" He replies "I know what you are, I'm just negotiating the price."

    Moral of the story: Begging for a free iPod makes you no better than a truck stop whore.

  101. This is not the only scam like this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are other scams like this one. Take a visit to www.doom3underground.com and look toward the top of the page. There will be a link there that claims a free Doom3 game offer 'expires today'. So ya better hurry, huh?! Wait! The link has its link target suppressed, but a little digging brings it out as http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com and some more text. This is only a transitory front door to the real destination, and that is www.everyfreegift.com/help.jsp! On this page you get invited to the scam. A link at the bottom of that page contains the meat. To get your 'free game' , you have to 'complete sponsors offers' of an unknown number of sponsors. Some of those sponsors are credit card companies trying to get their cards into your pocket. Sponsors at the bottom of that page are: Columbia House (a record 'club' of some notoriety), United Online, Chase Manhatten Bank, and American Online and a company whose symbol I cannot make out but seems to be a KW or KN. Completing the offers means getting a Chase card and probably rattin on friends by listing them on the required 'credit app'; also joining AOHell and acquiring another monthly bill; joining a record club that it takes a court order to leave, and so on. There are probably many other 'sponsors'! All of these 'offers' that a 'game winner' would be required to 'complete' have the potential to cost a lot of money. The website 'everyfreegift.com' is right in saying that they do not take any money directly from customers and visitors, but you can bet that the 'sponsors' will certainly kick back a hefty sum from the spoils by the time they get through shearing the digital sheep that show up on their doorstep hat in hand and panting for a 'free game' that really will be the most expensive bit of plastic that they ever got. "Everyfreegift.com" appears to have a wide selection of baits in their 'product catalog', so if you want a 'gift' (curse) that keeps on 'taking', by all means go see em. Your friends will LOVE you! But you will be a good exponent of the shepherds philosophy and not tell 'em, won't you? Who knows, maybe one of them already told them all about YOU? This data that you give really is valuable, even individually. Else why would Kroger, in the real world, forego up to 40 percent of a retail price just to get you to allow them to track your grocery purchases. Do you know that your beer purchases are valuable to car insuranse and health insurance companies, your sugar purchases valuable to health insurance companies, all of it valuable to companies that make recommendations on job applications for corporate clients, etc.......off topic but relevant. Your data is money, do not give it away and do not violate the trust of your friends by giving theirs away!

  102. Spare a copper, gov? by nativespeaker · · Score: 1

    I guess the problem I have with this is the same problem I have doing all multi-level sales -- basically, you're approaching someone and begging. Oh, it might be a friend who's helping you out 'cause you're a buddy, or it might be a family member, and you might be able to convince yourself that you're providing someone with an opportunity, but basically you're just like the guy gumming a trash-retrieved pickle whilst begging for change. I think that's pretty pathetic.

  103. Please die. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hottest gadgets around"? Seriously, kill yourself and lighten the load of marketing bullshit on the world.

  104. Bitch elsewhere by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    I got mine. Check my blog (planetmew.com/blog.html), I documented it all. Even exchanged it and paid the $100 to get a 40GB one.
    Some people don't understand the work it'll take to get a free $300 product and just expect it to fall in their lap.

    1. Re:Bitch elsewhere by Russellkhan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you must work for it, it's not free. You're just working, for a wage of one ipod.

      Personally, I'd put in my hours elsewhere and buy one (if an ipod was something I wanted that much) before working for some advertising company as their shill.

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    2. Re:Bitch elsewhere by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Some people don't understand the work it'll take to get a free $300 product and just expect it to fall in their lap.
      You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
  105. Except it doesn't work for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Moderations are for the content of the posting, not the signatures. If you don't like what you see in signatures, turn signatures off in your Slashdot settings.

    Yeah, except you've got your leech link in your "homepage" (under your name). And that we can't turn off. Besides, that's like saying "stop using email if you don't want spam".

  106. And so what does BSD cost? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I don't know... JWZ is fond of it and openstep and I wonder how that's really any different.

    OSX? Probably the most expensive OS to own, but then, he's solvent enough to run a nightclub so...

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  107. Re:Read this carefully -- think again by BreadMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no free lunch. Ever.

    If you're thinking of duplication costs; they're low, but certainly not zero. However, until somebody puts forth effort into producing an original work, there's nothing to duplicate.

    That takes us back to production: somebody had to pay for the engineering time and resources. Skilled engineering labor is expensive and most decent software projects require teams of people writing the software, docs, distro scripts and doing the QA. Even if this work is done "after hours" the worker could be working at a job that paid or be doing some other activity.

  108. There really are ways to earn free IPODs by ddurdle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are ways to get free IPODs. There was a big promotion in Canada by Pepsi that resulted in 2016 IPODs being given away; one every hour of every day from Oct 3rd to Dec 25th (no purchase required). I ended up winning two IPODs - but many teenage Canadians ended up winning between 2-6 IPODs each. I believe there were similiar contests/giveaways by Pepsi in other countries.

    1. Re:There really are ways to earn free IPODs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The easiest way is probably to steal one, though.

  109. Oh no. It's not Gratis, really. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    It's the companies that BUY the information they collect.

    Also, there's the little problem that referral-based schemes tend to collapse under their own weight (remember all those referral-based web ad systems back in the late 90s... what ever happened to those?)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  110. Here's another offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So far, I've received:
    $170 check from a free green xbox offer (now closed)
    Xbox, from another free xbox offer. (Anyfreegift)
    ipod, from freeipods.com
    $700 check, from freelaptops4you.

    I'll give you $50 to fuck your sister.

  111. The assumption was... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    that the working population would scale with the retiring population. Actually, you would expect there to always be proportionally more younger people as a population grows. However, the baby boom upset this relationship and now we're in deep shit.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  112. rational Slashdot users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add that to the list of oxymorons...

    jumbo shrimp
    hypocritical Democrats
    biased media
    liberal media
    asshole professors

  113. It's definitely not a scam by packslash · · Score: 0

    I'm listening to my photoipod right now! Yah I had to jump through some hoops, but as long as your not a complete loser and don't have any friends it's really pretty easy. http://www.freephotoiPods.com/?r=13346252

  114. Re:Oh this old and boring by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

    I signed up for AOL one day just to see what their interface was like. I mean, after all, they are known for being the "dumbed down" internet.

    Had no problems canceling a few days later. They offered a free month, then three free months. Nope, no thank you. "I'm moving out of the country where there is no AOL dialup number."

    They never billed my card a single time.

  115. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 insightful!

  116. Easier way to get free ipods WITHOUT spam by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Just rob the Apple store.

  117. Hi-diidlie-dee! We are a bunch of greedy elves!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod flaimbait as you must, but human greed and
    whoring for money/free Ipods/whatever is done,
    chiched(sp?), and tired to death. I wish humanity
    would just grow up.

  118. Things other than ipods by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As many of you know, this system has been used with everything from free ipods, to free laptops, to free plasma tvs.

    Since there is a mathematical formula for how long it takes for the pyramid to collapse, this cycle would then begin anew for each new item offered correct? So if people keep getting in at the top of each new item offered, they'll still be good right?

    Also, can anybody vouch for the legitimacy of those other things, particularly the plasma and laptop offers?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Things other than ipods by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      Also, can anybody vouch for the legitimacy of those other things, particularly the plasma and laptop offers?

      They had a special on that on Dallas news not long ago. They did all 3 and all 3 of them actually work. It is a pyramid scheme of email addy collection for the spammers(but an alternate email addy works...grin). They interviewed the guy who gave away the iPods and he said the ppl buying the addresses pay for the iPods instead.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  119. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    has anyone tried making 5 friends?

    is it hard? do you have to go outside?

  120. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "(At the very least, you're gonna be waiting on hold for 20 or 30 minutes until you talk to some cust. service clown who keeps trying to give you more "free hours" rather than just cancel you.)" I used to be that clown... :o(

  121. Too bad you don't get it .... by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Don't get me wrong, nothing tangible is free

    Software is not "Free" as in beer - when people do publish software Freely , they are doing charity. FOSS software can be sold (RMS sold emacs for 150 USD per copy !!!). But what FOSS tries to seperate is the Cost of Development from Profit per Sale.

    I have been (wioll haven been) paid to do some features on the OSS I work on - because somebody really needed it. That's because I created some wealth with my effort (in a wholly capitalistic point of view). And Everyone else gets the stuff for free and in short - Everybody wins.
  122. Another disatisfied customer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I still haven't recieved credit for a deal from freephotoipods.com that I did a month and a half ago. I signed up for the Urban Nutrition offer and I STILL haven't recieved credit. I filled a complaint on 11/30, and I haven't gotten a response almost a month later. I haven't canceled the offer so I have no clue what's going on...

  123. Re:Something is fishy about all the happy customer by irving47 · · Score: 1

    You want to hear something negative? Well... OK, if you insist... I had to complete three offers before I got my iPod because the first two were using yoggin.com's email service, which is gone gone gone. That meant no reference emails to prove I'd completed the offer. (I hadn't gotten credit automatically because I was using a Mac/Safari, I guess.)

    But sorry, I did get my ipod thanks to a few domains that I have and a fair amount of traffic. Took me about two months, I think.

    Anyone want to buy freeipods.info? :) (seriously. I registered it, but never did a thing with it.)

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  124. A site like these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A site like these? Rob's Giant BonusCard Swap Meet or The Ultimate Shopper (Safeway)

  125. Read with [out honoring agreements] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Also, it's not about registration. It's about my right to be able to access the Internet in privacy."

    How does "right to privacy" equate with "right to content without honoring an agreement"?*

    *And as NanoGator pointed out NYT's is more forgiving than most when it comes to meeting that agreement. I could also trim that "without honoring an agreement", and the question would still be valid.

    1. Re:Read with [out honoring agreements] by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      I never agreed to anything. And, since the means exists for me to access their content without registration, why shouldn't I?

      By the way, it is also possible to access their content without logging in at all, with fake user/pass or not. This link generator works nicely.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
  126. Re:i love my ipod by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    When comes the time that Mother Nature will give us droughts and floods and poison monkeys all together, you will care!
    - reference from "Simpsons: The Old Man & the Lisa"

  127. .sigs ARE moderated! by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
    Say whatever you want, but I've been seemingly arbitrarily modded down in the past for having had some annoying .sigs. For example, I was modded down almost every time I posted with this is my sig:

    I have a

    V
    e
    r
    t
    i
    c
    a
    l
    .sig

    Then again, I can see why people didn't like it in retrospect.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  128. Re:i love my ipod by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what's the insightful thing in that?

    that's like saying that a pyramid scheme isn't a scam because they paid the first 10% who got in.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  129. Linux IS NOT FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Nothing is free , except true charity and this is decidedly not charity. Somebody (Gratis Inc.) is making money. Let me tell you a secret.....your identity and demographic information is valuable. Individually, it means very little, but when you sell out your friends to get in on this scheme, numbers start adding up and marketing firms and companies are paying big for this information, thus the 500 iPods/week adding up to $6.5 Million US/year and the company is decidedly making a tidy profit on top of this expenditure.

    Allow me to paraphrase:

    Somebody (RedHat, IBM, Linux) is making money. Let me tell you a secret... your operating system is valuable. Individually, it means very little, but when you sell out Microsoft to get in on this Linux scheme, numbers start adding up and consulting firms and companies are paying big for linux consulting work... thus the 20000000 Linux-converts/week adding up to $Billions US/year and IBM is decidedly making a tidy rofit on top of this expenditure.

    &lt/sarcasm&gt

    More to the point - my demographic info means little to me. And once I discovered (early in colege) you get better junk mail if you say you're a CXO with 1/2 mil salary and an interest in hunting endangered species, my voluntereed demographic info really should have just as little value to marketing firms.

    An ipod for a few colorfully-exaggerated-fantasies is a pretty good trade.

  130. Read with [out honoring agreements]-I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I never agreed to anything."

    You decided to access their content.

    "And, since the means exists for me to access their content without registration, why shouldn't I? "

    Within the parameters set by the NYT.

    "By the way, it is also possible to access their content without logging in at all, with fake user/pass or not. This link generator works nicely."

    It's also possible to get a fake drivers license without giving the government any "privacy inhibiting" information.

    1. Re:Read with [out honoring agreements]-I by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      You decided to access their content.
      Nothing there says that by accessing their content, I agree to anything.

      Within the parameters set by the NYT.
      Obviously, it is possible to access their content without registration (reference the link generator). The generator only generates a different URL, so obviously, that's within NYT's parameters.

      It's also possible to get a fake drivers license without giving the government any "privacy inhibiting" information.
      The government has a need to know that information when I apply for a driver's license. The NYT, however, does not.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
  131. Nothing is free ... except for by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    Free software.

    --

    The Raven

  132. OSS (non tangible goods) is only free by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    if your time is worth nothing.

    With open source software it's very rare that the product a) does exactly what you want and b) works perfectly out of the box. As a result, using OSS requires two primary considerations; what's missing and what's broken. You then have to consider the time it's going to take to fix the bugs and add in the custom features you need.

    And time is money. I only consider my web-site profitable now because the costs are met by the revenue. This is mostly due to some clever rearranging of resources. However, the amount the site brings in doesn't come close to meeting what I make per hour at my job. If I claimed some kind of salary I'd be waaaay in the red. Instead of bobbing gently in the black.

    Free time is a mostly fictional concept. There is always a cost associated with how you spend your time. Time you spend behind a computer costs you time you could be spending with friends and family. The only time I consider free are the hours from midnight to 10am. Only the time you cut from sleep I consider free time.

    It's extra time to be alive and experience something that normally you'd be oblivious to.

    1. Re:OSS (non tangible goods) is only free by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With open source software it's very rare that the product a) does exactly what you want and b) works perfectly out of the box.

      Whereas closed source never has any bugs and always does exactly what you want?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:OSS (non tangible goods) is only free by tclark · · Score: 1

      Are you out of you're freaking mind? OSS has saved me so much time it's insane. Here's just one example: a couple of months ago I needed to put a website quickly. I used Linux, Apache, PHP, MySQL, and Geeklog and I had a complete, full featured website ready to go in about half a day. And yes, it did exactly what I wanted out of the box, providing even more features than I hoped for with fewer bugs than I'd expect to see in comparable proprietary packages.

      MS Windows, on the other hand, is one of the nastiest time bandits I've ever seen. Check back with me on Friday to see how much time I've spent dealing with annoying bugs in Windows. Here's one for starters: the guy down the hall, running Win2k, can't set any of his printers to be the default. Let me know if you've got any ideas.

  133. Re: Time is money by tuxpixie · · Score: 1

    way back in the days before i had a dsl line, I used to use those free aol cds that used to drop through the door (AOL/UKOL/Compuserve) to get free internet time. and to start with cancelling was never aproblem with any of them. but around the time that UKOL & Compuserve vanished i had some pretty major hassles with trying to cancel an aol free trial. i actually ended up paying for 2 months dial up access that was never used as i was out of the country at the time.. having supposedly cancelled it before leaving. and as for the ipod thingys.. i live in the uk so i never even had the temptation. *pix

  134. Free ipod link by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

    Well, since we're talking about free ipods... see my sig. :)

    --
    I was raised on the command line, bitch

    "Nemo me impune lacesset"

  135. Read this carefully-Failed reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Property is what you can lose. If you create a sculpture, you can lose it; if you paint a painting, you can lose it. "Intellectual Property," on the other hand, is the "right" to tell other people they may not produce certain things."

    IP can be forgotten. IP (expressions of an idea) is what is being controlled by the government, and those who don't wish to share.

    "The market sets a value on that which is scarce - i.e. what a person cannot have if someone else has it. "Intellectual property" has a value only because governments are letting people and companies buy and sell the right to restrict what people say and do."

    IP can be as scare as anything tangible (I've developed warp travel. Were's your copy?)

    "This is unconscionable. I don't care how much people earn by doing it, it's still wrong."

    Opinion noted.

    "Restricting people's rights to life and liberty held up the American South's cotton economy until the mid-1800s."

    Life and Liberty don't guarentee "right to the fruits of expression" nor the "expression" itself of others.

    "Restricting people's right to free speech and movement held up the Soviet Russian economy."

    Ideas still existed in Soviet Russia.

    "I don't care how much "time and effort" somebody puts in to get the right to muzzle me. I still won't be muzzled."

    You are free to create your own "expression of an idea".

    "Anyone who thinks gagging the public is "fair compensation" for a creative act doesn't deserve to have free speech."

    You can still have your "free speech" within the limits of "not yelling fire in a crowded theatre" or plagerizing others "free speech".

    However you don't have the right to specific expressions of an idea gained through time and effort by others.

  136. Free Photo iPod Deal is legit and easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign up for one free deal (like a free trial of efax) and get a few friends to do the same. You can cancel the efax account before the free 30 day trial and not get charged.

    http://www.freephotoiPods.com/?r=12707567

  137. No, they'll start policing by kiddailey · · Score: 1

    If enough people start using bugmenot, these bastards just might stop requiring us to give them our life history to access a bit of information.
    Not really true. If enough people start using it, more registration required sites will start using BugMeNot to police their registration database for false accounts, probably automatically. One site I visit appears to already be doing this.
  138. Nothing like this in Canada? by ashground · · Score: 1
    I've seen schemes like this before, and honestly, I think it's pretty clever advertising. If someone wants to send me an iPod in exchange for taking in a few ads or services, be my guest. If you know what you're trading, there's really nothing wrong.

    That said, I would do something like freeipods.com in a second if they had anything like that in Canada, but it seems like Canadian advertisers haven't jumped on that bandwagon. Has anyone seen a Canadian advertising company do something like this?

  139. Friends don't hawk Ponzi-Pods! by bhima · · Score: 2, Funny
    I don't make myself available to advertisers. I don't have a TV, I don't fill out sweepstakes entries, I don't read postal mail not addressed to me, I don't read spam. I don't tolerate having my "Friends" subject me to advertising. That's the real point.

    It has little to do with the reality of the iPod, or the cost of the iPod. But has everything to do with the offensiveness of the distribution mechanism.

    Which is why I systematically 'Foe' everyone I see hawking ponzi-pods.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Friends don't hawk Ponzi-Pods! by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1
      If it makes you feel better, I never used, and never would use, the "refer a friend" link they have to submit friend's email addresses. I'm not going to make the choice for them and subject their primary email address to the torrent of spam. I figure if someone wants to do it, they surely know their signing up that email account for tons of spam, and will pick an account for that purpose.

      As such, I don't see a problem with someone willingly signing up knowing what their getting into. I would have a huge problem handing my friends email addresses to Gratis without their consent, and I wouldn't do it.

      On that note, the amount of spam my spare account has received has dropped to nearly nothing lately. Makes me wonder if they only send for awhile if you always delete it. And canceling AOL was a breeze. Which surprised me more than the spam fall off. Might have had something to do with telling them I was switching the last computer to Linux. :)

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

  140. Free Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you want free stuff? just create your own website/electronic magazine and write reviews. Hardware/software companies sometimes send their products and also pay advertising if you write a review or article, just try to be "objective".

    This way I have received books, software and some of the most modern computer hardware, for free.

    1. Re:Free Hardware by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

      My friend got every Adobe product this way. It works. Plus you can get those nifty press passes to conferences!

  141. Ahhh Bill Hicks. by colonslashslash · · Score: 1
    Comedic God. No doubt, I've made it my personal crusade to edumacate all my friends and colleagues with his shows and audio tapes, not one single person has failed to laugh all the way through yet.

    The man was pure genius.

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  142. Better Yet, get an iRiver! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very much the same deal as the photo ipod
    http://www.pvps4free.com/default.aspx?r=1316 72

  143. Re: Time is money by transiit · · Score: 1

    Fuck that.

    So I'll admit to signing up for as many free offers as I could circa 1997, sticking to anything that would actually send me free tangible stuff (I think the most I ever got was a "Internet-safe color wheel poster")

    But forget this. I could almost understand giving out a street address, provided it accepts P.O. Boxes or that I was planning on moving without filling out a change of address card at the post office anyhow.

    If it were really lucrative, and I'd had several independent confirmations that it was on the up and up, I could almost give out a credit card number, believing that I could cancel it later if it turned out to be a hive of scum and villainry.

    If the clouds opened up and the almighty $DEITY said "Do it. It'll be fine.", I'd give up my SSN, knowing that even it could be exchanged in instances of fraud.

    But there's no way in hell I'd provide anyone a copy of my birth certificate in the name of a free, soon-to-be-obsolesent not-quite-standards-complaint digital music player.

    -transiit

  144. Re: Time is money by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    if those clouds opened up all that'd happen is $DEITY->smite_the_unbeliever_with_cunning(@argumen ts);

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  145. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word you want is simply "obsolete." Suffixing superfluous syllables doesn't make you look smarter.

  146. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually did go thru that process. I used 5 email accounts which to most would appear to have no relationship to one another. I used false contact information on all of the phony accounts. Naturally, the system doesn't "verify" them until AFTER all 5 emails have attempted their offers. Only after that do they discredit you, once they've already gotten me to sign up for 6 different offers.

    The only way they could have been identified as phony is either by the name/info I used when signing up for each offer (which poses a big privacy issue), by the credit card info (which is even a bigger issue), or by IP address, since I did not have the insight to sign up for each offer behind a different IP address. I suspect it was actually the latest, but I don't put anything by that company.

    Anyway, moral of the story is, don't try it unless you use different IP addresses for each phony e-mail.

  147. Because most people WON'T get an iPod by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's do the math. I'm not going to double check the figures, but I believe you refer 5 people, and once they all sign up, you get a free iPod. Rinse and repeat.

    Okay, so one person hooks up five people, they all sign up (making the company $50 * 6 = $300) and a $249 iPod is sent out to the first guy. Profit so far is $51.

    Each of those five hooks up five people for a total of 25 new people, so 25 * 50 = 1250. Five iPods = 1245, not much profit this time.. so this shows that at $50 there's no real profit for the company at each generation, until...

    25 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 = 2.5 billion.

    At this point you've exhausted everyone on the Internet, as you can't sign up more than once. So where's the money?

    As in ANY pyramid scheme, the money is in the last generation of the scheme! Free iPods will reach a point where they have several million on their books, and those several million can't find anyone to sign up! So.. several million * 50 = $A LOT OF PROFIT. And those guys won't get an iPod. Cha-ching.

    1. Re:Because most people WON'T get an iPod by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      $51 profit on $300 is 17% gross profit.

      You think that's unacceptable? That's better than Dell.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    2. Re:Because most people WON'T get an iPod by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      Your calculations above regarding gratis profits don't take into account things such as over-refferring and under referrals (which get no ipod)...

      a referral marketing system is never filled that efficiently/perfectly.

      fwiw: I think calling the gratis promotions a "scheme" or "pyramid" is a little over reactionary... it's more AMWAY than PONZI.

      I do agree that the forum pollution of freeXYZ.com referral links in sigs is annoying.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:Because most people WON'T get an iPod by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These schemes rely on a certain amount of turnover, so maybe you'll get 5 or 6 levels in the pyramid, but a lot of the lower levels will sign up, realise they've been conned and write off the money. This helps keeps the burn rate of eligible suck ..err.. consumers low enough to sustain the pyramid.

      The people at the top will be driving ferrari's, though. I was hired once to write some software to handle one of these schemes (even today a lot of them are paper based) and I got to see the figures for the top 3 layers (mostly the friends/relatives of the guy who set the scheme up). Lets just say I wouldn't mind getting that much every year, let alone every month!

      In this country they banned pyramid schemes, so they renamed themselves to 'multi-level-marketing' schemes to avoid the law (there are some subleties in the way they work too). Same thing though.

    4. Re:Because most people WON'T get an iPod by jgerry · · Score: 1

      This analysis completely ignores a very important point: some number of people who try and get a free ipod won't ever get one. But they will have signed up for one of these offers themselves, and they may have signed up others, but not reached the required 5 new people. Referral fees get paid out to Gratis Internet for the initial responder + whoever this person has got to sign up for offers as well.

      These "incomplete" transactions probably account for most of their profit. They may be offering a legitimate service, but the profit for them lies in people trying to get their free ipod and not quite getting there.

    5. Re:Because most people WON'T get an iPod by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      I think the grandparent was describing the "worst case" scenario, at least in Gratis' eyes - everyone who signs up qualifies for the freebie by fulfilling the requirements. In that case, Gratis won't see much profit until so many people have joined that the market is saturated and the late-comers don't qualify.

      Of course, that can happen anywhere in the tree. If I signed up, I don't think I'd be able to get 5 other people together to help me qualify. Not that I don't know enough people, it's just that the people I know really don't give a damn about iPods... So, Gratis would immediately see a profit from me, and I'm not going to give it to them.

      BTW, could someone who has signed up explain how Gratis gets around people creating a bunch of fictitious friends?? Sure, that would be fraud, but how could they tell??

  148. Worked for me... by PorkCharSui · · Score: 1

    I had all offers completed in early November and was suprised to actually recieve my iPod. It came via FedEx directly from Apple within two weeks of clicking order. Popped it onto craigslist, sold it. Bought a digital camera. Cost to me or my referees $0. End of story.

  149. Rat Back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Friends" that pushes ads in their sigs is fair game to be ratted out to spammers. >-)

  150. FoeBud Privacy-Card by jeti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Germany, we have the PayBack system, where you get something like 1% of each purchase on a separate account or something. It's pretty big over here, and I guess it must be comparable to the courtesy cards you mentioned.

    The clue is that these cards are tranferable. So FoeBud got a card, made "Privacy-Cards" with the same barcode, and offered them to people interested in consumer privacy. Several thousand euro were collected, but PayBack wouldn't pay out.

    So the whole thing went before a court. The court apparently decided that FoeBud could tell their barcode number to others, but were not allowed to print it out.

  151. Re:Oh this old and boring by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine made the mistake of signing up to AOL with his debit card. I watched him at work make dozens of phone calls to try and get AOL to stop billing him. Eventually he got frustrated enough he went to his bank and threatened to close his account if they didn't stop it.

    I think he did eventually get AOL to cancel - but the moral is, if you must sign up to AOL, use a credit card rather than a debit card. (Generally, it's also less hassle to cancel a credit card rather than close your bank account and change billing/direct debit instructions for all your bills to a new account)

  152. Too good offer... by dutt · · Score: 1

    If an offer sounds too good to be true, it usually is.

  153. TANSTAAFL by RedBear · · Score: 1

    From everything I have read, it seems legit as far as people getting their ipods.

    You're missing something. The fact that some people got iPods is meaningless if you're trying to prove this thing is "legit". Everyone who gets into the early stages of a pyramid scheme makes out great. Yeah, the initial people get their iPods, but in the end a lot of people are still going to get screwed out of their "free iPod" because it's a Ponzi/pyramid scheme. "There's no two ways about it", as the saying goes.

    Here's how it works. The advertising research company gets paid X amount by the advertisers for each referral, such that 6*X is greater than the price of an iPod. They then order a brand new iPod for the first guy, keep the small profit margin and the other 5 people are left to come up with another 5 referrals... each. After about 6 generations of this all possible leads are used up as the number of people signed up increases exponentially.

    The sequence below is just the number of new referrals required in each generation for every person in the previous generation to qualify for a free iPod, not including a running total:

    1, 5, 25, 125, 625, 3125, 15625, 78125, 390625, 1953125, 9765625, 48828125

    The last few generations of signers are never able to complete their 5 referrals because every person on the Internet who could possibly fall for this has already been contacted and roped in. At that point the advertising company gets to keep ALL the money for everyone who has signed up, because no one can possibly meet the requirements to qualify for a free iPod.

    They make a profit for the initial generations of people who sign up, but after the "market" gets saturated it's ALL profit. No more free iPods. It may be perfectly "legit" but it is still a pyramid scheme. Plain. And. Simple. It's only free for the people who jump on the wagon the moment it starts rolling. There is no sustainability, it will eventually (quickly) fizzle out.

    I figure there's no way any generation past about the sixth (3,125) could ever have a more than 25% success rate at getting their free iPods, taking into account the supply of new iPods, the number of people who actually go through the whole process, the number of people in qualifying countries who have Internet access and somehow encounter a link into this scheme, etc, etc. There are a thousand different variables that will keep the majority of those who sign up from getting anything, while the advertising research company still gets its $50-60 per head for as long as people still think they have a snowball's chance in Hell to get a free iPod. Judging by the stupidity of the average homo sapiens, they could probably keep getting referrals out to about generation ten, maybe even eleven (wouldn't want to underestimate human stupidity). They start out with a small profit margin on each signer and work their way up to making out like bandits and laughing all the way to the bank.

    There are a lot of legal scams, and this is one of them. Don't tell people it's legit just because it's legal. I think at this point it's only still legal because it's obscured by the misdirection of where the money is coming from and going to. You put money into the scheme, but your money goes directly to other companies (the advertisers, from whom you order small items to qualify for the referral system), and the advertisers pay out money but it doesn't go to you, it goes to the middleman (the advertising research company), who promises you a free iPod. It ends up being a lie because the final generations cannot possibly complete the requirements, but they are still enticed into giving up personal information and buying useless junk.

    If it requires that much sleight of hand and misdirection, it's always a scam. And of course all this is ignoring the part about every person turning in 5 people so that advertisers can collect their demographic information. That part is pretty rank, and not worth the price of an iPod in my opinion. You're paying for that iPod, just not with money.

    TANSTAAFL, my friend. TANSTAAFL. Or should that be TANSTAAFI now?

  154. It's not a pyramid scheme. by raehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In this case, the money is probably in the FIRST level or two of the scheme. I already don't have 5 people who would get 5 friends to sign up; and I'd be the first level if I signed up, so they'd get maybe $60-$180 out of me and my friends, and give out *NO* I-pods.

    It's also not a true pyramid scheme in the sense that you don't have to pay any money to get in. There's a fine line between a pyramid scheme and just paying people to do sales. My company has a bunch of people we pay JUST to sell stuff. And in fact, some of the people they sell stuff too then turn around and sell it to someone else. We call those people END USERS.

    In this case, the people who sign up for offers but don't get iPods are just the end users. The people who manage to get other people to sign up and get iPods are just a cheap sales force.

    1. Re:It's not a pyramid scheme. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      This pretty much reeks of pyramid scheme. No you do not offer money - but you offer your information which in turn is sold for profit. You also have to subscribe to a pay service (which you can unsubscribe) which that company then has to pay a referral fee. So X company who wants your legitimate subscription, just paid 50 bucks to the advertising company for nothing more then your e-mail address - plus the hassle of dealing with you on the phone about cancelling your account.

      In the end, however, the last people to sign up will lose.

      On a side note - the people at the top of the pyramid (those who start it, and usually the first and second ranks below them) do not pay to get in. I start the pyramid, include my two best friends to be below me (free), and they include their two best friends to be below them (free), but the third rank has to pay to get in. They pay the top level guy (me). I make a profit and run. My two friend below me hopefully make a profit and run, and eventually someone gets hosed. But at least my best friends, and their best friends (which probably know me) are A-OK! This scheme does not need so many levels - you get something from the people right below you - however, they automatically get screwed cause you sold their e-mail addresses to some company and their affiliates.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  155. Is this the answer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Free IPOD Offer

    My name is Mungani Bantuwaani, wife of the late GeneraL Abangi Bantuwaani who was recently executed by criminals in a coup of the Democratic Replublic of Katanga. I am a good Christian and so are my eleven children and eight adopted children and so was able to escape to the relative safety of Switzerland in a cago ship. Unfortunately, my late husband's substantial bank account is still frozen by the Authorities in Katanga and will not release funds to me. It brings me shame to beg you!

    For the sake of the 17 children, will you please send me your bank account details so that I can pass them to a collegue and friend in the Katanga Nationla Reserve who will instantly transfer the sum of YSD 15,000,000 to you, so long as you promise to then transfer the same amount (less a 10% handling fee) to my account in Switzerland? Alternatively if you send me 20 Ipods I will be able to give each of my children a present they deserve in leiu of their father.

    Yours and God Bles from the Children

    Mrs Mungani Bantuwaani (Deceased)

  156. Re:Calculator for the value of your demographics i by eatjello · · Score: 1

    According to this calculator, my entire life is worth $278.60. Wow, that's depressing.

  157. Hrrmph! by thegnu · · Score: 0

    I think my sig speaks for itself.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  158. Re:Calculator for the value of your demographics i by Abreu · · Score: 1

    There are places in South Africa, Mexico or Brazil where you can get someone professionally killed for less than that...

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  159. OK Riddle me this by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    So what's the difference in this scenario?

    1. I paint a picture on a canvas with oil and it takes me a week or so to do it. I sell same picture for $600.

    2. I paint a picture on a computer (using Painter) using virtual oil brushes and it takes me a week or so to do it. I print the picture with an Epson 7600. Now, how much is the digital image? How much is the print itself?

    If you're typing there telling me the digital image is free, while the act of printing the digital painting is worth $600, uh you don't understand what went into making the painting, do you?

    1. Re:OK Riddle me this by gwjgwj · · Score: 1

      If you're typing there telling me the digital image is free, while the act of printing the digital painting is worth $600, uh you don't understand what went into making the painting, do you?
      So, how much you charge for other copies?

    2. Re:OK Riddle me this by Spyffe · · Score: 1

      I like a good riddle...

      Answer: value to you != value to others. Just because you spend a week making something does not mean you have the right to extract value from it.

      That's the fundamental argument here: there's a culture of believing that simply because an author or musician sits down and writes / records something, they automatically gain the right to sue everyone that reproduces it.

      There's a simple philosophical difference here: are you willing to have your rights systematically restricted and traded, or not?

      But your argument relates to my "painting" passage. I was simply calling a painting physical property. In the context of that passage, a painting is no more than a piece of paper and some chemicals spread over its surface, regardless of the means used to transfer them.

      Such a piece of paper is worth whatever you can get for it. If Van Gogh spent a minute on a pencil sketch, that would fetch more than a painting you or I spent a year on.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  160. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think one of the "simplest" ones to cancel was the offer to sign up with AOL, and as most of us probably already know - that's not usually the easiest thing in the world to cancel. (At the very least, you're gonna be waiting on hold for 20 or 30 minutes until you talk to some cust. service clown who keeps trying to give you more "free hours" rather than just cancel you.)

    AOL doesn't seem to cancel accounts. My mother signed up for one of those free month deals thinking to use it with a laptop while on travel vacationing but she ended up never using even one minute of it because she couldn't get it working with the laptop. 6 months later and 6 calls later and they still bill her credit card every month for it. AOL are scammers, plain and simple.

  161. Re:Pyramid **SELLING** by nolife · · Score: 1

    The only thing that seems even remotely like a pyramid is the way the ipod people collect emails.

    You make this sound like that is not a big deal. The part of recruiting and supplying the names of others is 100% required for you to complete the deal. It is not optional. If you do NOT supply names and those people do NOT sign up, you get absolutely nothing. So, what you consider a small part of the scheme, is a major factor on how the whole thing works. Eventually as proven with some basic math, there will be a point where a vast majority of people will not find 5 other people and shortly there after, it will mathmatically impossible to find 5 people. At that point, the bottom will have fallen out and the whole thing will come crashing down. You reference "changing the deal" as you realize it really is a pyramid. What about the people half way through still looking for people? They get nothing. At what point does the company decide to pull the plug?

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  162. Re:Something is fishy about all the happy customer by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Set up my account in the last couple of hours?

    Oh BOLD AC, you know not of what you speak. Look at our UID's and you'll relize my tale came LONG before any such free iPod deals were a twinkle in their daddy's eye.

    Yours Truly,

    zoloto

  163. Re:Something is fishy about all the happy customer by zoloto · · Score: 1

    err.. look at my uid and it came long before the free iPod deals.

    bleh. it's still early.

  164. Re: Time is money by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    I'd give them a Visa Buxx card number with $0 balance ;-)

    That said, I wouldn't participate in this pyramid scheme .

  165. Say what you will, but I got a Freeipod by Blarneystonejeff · · Score: 1

    OK. I got my freeipods and I'm happy with the service. If you know what you're getting into then its your choice. ....and personally I'm happy with it.

    First off you don't have to give up your friends and family. All you have to do is send your own email to friends and family and include your Freeipods referral link. That gives them the choice whether or not they want to do it or not. If they don't sign up then Freeipods doesn't get any of their personal info. If you send out referalls through their site(instead of sending the referral link), then freeipods can get your friends and family's personal email....but if you don't do it that way then they won't.

    I did mine back in the day when all I had to do was open up and Ebay account and place a bid...that was my completed offer. They don't offer than one anymore....I guess cause it was too easy and everyone was doing it.

    So anyway I got mine after like 3 or 4 months. My gmail address gets major spam, but it all goes into my spam folder, so no worries.

    My feeling is that you give that personal info out all the time and companies already have a ton of information about you anyway. ...and they're only gonna keep getting more.

    Anyway here's a pic w/ my freeipod...just for legitimacy.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffmchugh/1206088/

  166. All I'm saying is by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    it doesn't hurt anyone to buy it through Gratis, provided they were buying it in the first place.

    And Gratis' TOS says they do not resell or give away your personal data, though I believe they anonymize it and resell the anonymous purchasing info.

    From the site itself:

    We use other third parties to provide a short survey on our site which, with your consent, will collect the personally identifiable information entered on the preceding address form page in order to supply you with information about various special offers and services. These third parties are prohibited from using your personally identifiable information for any other purpose. You are provided with the option of opting out of these surveys, and must consent to each offer on an individual basis for your personally identifiable information to be transmitted.

    I didn't fill out any surveys when I did my offer, and neither did any of my friends.

    We may work with other third party businesses using the personal information that you supply to us on the main signup page to bring selected retail opportunities to our members via direct mail, email and telemarketing. These businesses may include providers of direct marketing services and applications, including lookup and reference, data enhancement, suppression and validation and email marketing. You may choose to opt out of receiving these promotional emails at the initial point of email collection by deselecting this option. Keep in mind that if you take advantage of an offer from a Gratis Internet business partner and thus, become their customer, they may independently wish to send offers to you. In the event that you are not interested in receiving future offers from these affiliates, you must contact them directly to fulfill your list removal request.

    This is fairly standard. It's the same as when you deselect the check box when installing any application that wants to send you stupid marketing emails.

    Where's the problem here? Be scrupulous about identifying opportunities for companies to mine your data, and you're fine. None of my friends are dumb enough to not pay attention to this stuff.

    --

    +++ATH0
  167. Spam: The Old, the New and the Rehash. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Informative


    Yes, of course they're making money off of this. It doesn't take a slashnot story to figure that one out. We're not exactly talking about breaking news here. And even so, do you really have a problem with that? I don't. And yes, they ask for personal information, but do you actually give it to them? I gave them an email address I can shut down at a moments notice. I gave them a creditcard that can't be used again. I don't mind giving out a physical address simply becasue these guys aren't interested in sending out real mail-- That costs money. It's not the MO of a spammer anyway.

    Honestly, this story is a little lopsided in nature. Call me biased (see sig for details), but you don't have to play by their rules. I mean, God forbid you use that concept in say, a free email account? Not that they don't attempt to make cash off you either. Or how about slashdot adverts and the story self promotions you see occationally?*

    Seriously, you play this game every day on the internet. Nothing changed just because it's a free ipod or because Slashdot all of a sudden became aware of it.

    * No, I honestly don't care. Unlike some people I've accepted it as something that goes with the territory.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  168. Not really a "scam" ... but... by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work for the company that owns freeflixtix.com, evivaclub.com, & tenspot.com - the premise was simple. Sign up, refer 5 friends, and get free movie tickets.
    All of the information was happily sold off to "3rd party marketing partners" and the list (over 7 million people when I left) was also used for the company's spamming arm, Moxio (or Bonus Bonez, whatever they're calling it now) - you and your referrals all got the spam. Lots of it. If you cancelled your freeflixtix.com account, your referrals (and usually you) still got tons of spam. Your address (email, phone number, AND mailing address) was sold off already.

    Yes, people eventually did get some free tickets after jumping through "partner" hoops..some requiring you to keep the "trial" for 2 weeks or more, or to give up MORE personal info & credit card numbers.

    It's worse than the "freecreditreport.com" scam that requires you to sign up for Equifax's "Credit Monitoring Service" and more spam.

    Is there any way that Slashdot can simply dump any post that has that ponzi scheme as a sig?

  169. There is one, I think by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Someone on here had 510-THE-SCAM registered for Safeway and encouraged others to use it.
    I use it all the time and still get my Safeway discounts.

    Now if only I could score the receipt that said I bought enough deli sandwiches to get my free one, I'd be a happy camper. :)

  170. Don't follow the fucking link retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus how stupid can you be? You're a sad little lobster, too weak to pull up the side of the trap, so you're desperately grabbing at all the other lobsters. The guy has a link on his name that people interested can follow if they find his posts interesting. If you don't like it, don't fucking follow it.

    I cannot fucking stand pathetic lowest-in-the-totem pole sniping assholes. I don't link to anything of my own because I don't want cunts like you spamming me becuase you're angry, but I fucking would like to boot every asscunt like you in the face when you start sniping others because of your petty jealousy.

  171. Conspiracy? by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

    What if it's a all just a conspiracy to build up a huge database of personal data and then when it's big enough, unleash the biggest floodwave of spam the world has ever seen? On a more serious topic though (Well, not entirely), Gratis means free in swedish.

    --
    Error: No error occurred
  172. Info Links by rich3929 · · Score: 0

    Here's my personal webpage that shows proof pages for many of these offers...

    http://users.zoominternet.net/~rconrad/free.html

    Here's a link to the Internet's Definitive Guide for all this free stuff.

    http://www.FreebieAuthority.com

  173. If it doesn't do what you want, you don't buy it by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Closed source has to be an exact fit or you have to cater to it.

    This is why, where possible, open source is prefered or custom tools are created from scratch.

    The main point being that nothing, not even open source is free. Unless your time is worth nothing.

  174. Bizzaro world Slashdot, of course... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... where we all have polite, reasoned discussions about the wonders of Windows and the suckiness of Linux. You mean there's another version?

    Sean

  175. YOU FAIL IT by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

    You fail it! ("it" is coming even remotely close to properly identifying my party affiliation).

    You are such a miserable, miserable failure. Go back to your blue state subsidized lifestyle you wife-beating welfare monkey. I didn't request the services of a gap-toothed inbred mountain man, so keep your mouth shut until you're called upon or I'll cut off your free supply of government cheese and food stamps you red state retard.

    You succeed it! ("it" is being trolled by an obviously baited sig line like the red state failure that you are).

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  176. Re:Oh this old and boring by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine made the mistake of signing up to AOL with his debit card.

    Why do so many people fall into this trap?!? A debit card is a direct line into a checking account, which for most people is all the money they have.

    I wouldn't be suprised for there to be some huge consumer-action backlash in a few years against debit cards and direct-withdrawal billing schemes. The people sucked into this mess tend to be poor, which is a shame.

    Everyone, the cost of a stamp is little to pay for keeping people's hands out of your only cash reserve!

    Even using a credit card is risky, as I have seen CCs billed that required calling the company to have them credit back the charges. Imagine the unnecessary pain if the company decided to be jerks about it? You have to call your bank and even might have to hire a lawyer. It isn't worth it. Just send them a damn check and make them cry to you for more money if they want it so badly.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  177. Re: Time is money by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

    No, its not that bad. But it is a hassle. I signed up for a different trial with each of the ipod, desktop, and flatscreen and cancelled them the same day no problem. I did have to call 2 of the companies to cancel, and one tried to give me a different offer, but they cancelled easily enough.
    The hardest part is getting others to sign up, I don't think I had anyone actually complete an offer under me. The "Time is Money" thing is definately applicable. Ultimately, it would probably be easier just to go buy an ipod/desktop/flatscreen.

  178. Data Rape by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Gratis Inc can burn in hell!! They are slobbering data hungry bastards who resort to tactics usually in the domain of spammers and child pornographers to get their greasy hands on peoples demographic data. At least "demographic data" is how they euphamise private, and personal data mining, with blatant disregard for the privacy and dignity of their victims. And offering illegal pyramid schemes to idiots who put money above their friends disgusts me even more. If I found out that someone I knew was selling off my details to such scum as Gratis, I tell everyone I knew that that person was an untrustworthy snake, and I would personally never have any business with them ever again. Idiot slashdotters with such sigs should be modded down, ASAP!

    Personal data is on a need to know basis, and these filty data rapers do not need to know. They know my name, address, salary, habit, likes, dislikes and then squeal to lawmakers when honest people try to stop all this unethical behaviour. But if I was to try to find out their companies address, revenue, business contacts etc... I would be a criminal trespassers and would promptly be burned at the stake for my libertarian heresy against the corpratocracy.

    I will not believe, and noone will persuade me, that this is all OK. So much personal data in the hands of private companies cannot lead to anything good. At best we can hope for a deluge of offers and junk mail, at worst we can hope for blackmail, surveillance and authoritatrianism. Extreme I grant you, but made ever more possible by the dispicable actions of the likes of Gratis Inc.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  179. Cease and Desist letter.... to which address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like that idea. random barcode use would drive the grocery stores mad. Can you imagine what would happen? I'm visiting Mom for the holidays, and Mom has no less than a dozen of these little things on her keyring. 5 grocery stores, 2 pet stores, 3 pharmacies, and others that I don't even recognize. I'd really get a kick out of 1/2 million people all using the same barcode for a day, then switching to random codes the next day, then switching back, and just f&cking with the whole system.

    1. Re:Cease and Desist letter.... to which address? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      As some have pointed out to me, several people are already doing what I've considered, though not on the scale that I would like.

      So, it's only a matter of time. If we really can annoy them, well, that means they'll have to do something about it. Of course the legal argument will be absurd, and if things were fair, could never win, and be ignored at the appeals level. Of course, things aren't fair, it isn't "sacred" enough for a judge to care about protecting even if they have a non-stupid opinion, and even in the best of circumstances it would cost thousands of $$$ to get that far. Anyone want to make odds on how long those sites last, the ones people posted in response to my original comment?

  180. Re:Oh this old and boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What that AC says is correct, my parents tried to cancel their AOL account and AOL just ignored it for a few months.

    The do this counting on you to forget about it, and for the more determined make it a pain in the butt, and a waste of your time and money to do so.

    Oh and if you think that signing up with a credit card that is about to cancel is going to save you, think again. Even if your credit card number chances, places can obtain your next credit card info and continue charging like normal.

  181. Re:Oh this old and boring by fluxrad · · Score: 1

    If you've ever tried to cancel an AOL subscription, you've probably noticed that their employees are likely fired if they cancel a single subscription.

    How the hell do I get moderated -1:Troll, yet you come out with that particular gem and are modded "insightful."

    I used to work for AOL and had several personal accounts quite some time ago. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  182. Re: Time is money by kinzillah · · Score: 1

    You don't need the birth certificates for them. YOu need the birth certificates to have credit cards in other names. They run a check to make sure that people don't use multiple cards for one person and cheat them.

    --
    Douglas P. Price
  183. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amateur.

  184. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never have had to provide a B.C. for a credit card. Weird. That is not something I would ever do. This isn't a passport, fer krissakes.

  185. Re: Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tip from personal experience: cancel via fax. No muss no fuss, AOL account is gone after about 3 days

    Personal experience: I faxed them all the info they asked for, and they kept my account active, charged me for the next month. I had to call, and speak with someone in the land of Sacred Cows who tried EVERYTHING to not cancel me. Took a half hour on the phone to finally get canceled, and I never did get the monthy fee back they charged me.

  186. Re:Good Conga Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    smartcongaline is terrible. Go to http://www.gratisoffersguide.com/ forums or one of the other popular sites.

  187. Survey says: still a scam! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Once again, your post says one thing and your sig says the opposite. If you already have your 5 suckers...errr..."friends" signed up, and don't need me (or any other slashdot readers) why are you still spamming a referrer link for freeipods.com in your sig?

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  188. I propose a trade... by gekkotron · · Score: 0

    To heck with the gratis and other sites. I've got six Gmail invites I will happily trade for a working 20gb or larger Ipod. Please reply to this to take me up on it.

  189. It works but it's very hard. by Stopher2475 · · Score: 1

    It actually does work. My cousin got his. It just takes forever and you have to complain to get credit for an offer. I'm sure there are also scams out there as well. It's actually pretty hard to get 5 people. I could only get 2 and I'm still waiting for credit on those. The easiest offer are the credit cards because you don't actually have to buy anything. It's a pain in the butt but I still want a free iPod. http://www.freeiPods.com/?r=12135918

  190. Big Deal. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    I was attempting to differentiate this scheme from pyramid selling. Pyramid selling is illegal and for good reasons, this scheme is not illeagal(INAL) but it is certainly not reputable. The ipods are free as in beer, they are actually a commission for signing up X customers to Y company. There is no requirement for you to buy anything to "complete the deal", that would make it pyramid selling(INAL). The deal is for you to provide enough leads for the company to sign-up X people and get Y product as a reward. Is it a bit sleezy? do they re-sell names? do they fold before delivering on the reward? of course they do. This is just the latest gimmick in a long history of gimmicks to hook people into working hard at making a pain of themselves to get a "free" trinket. If you want privacy, don't tell eveyone your life story and make sure it is clear to your mates that what you tell them is confidential (eg: "I will give you my cell number but I don't want everyone to know it, ok?"). As I said before, you can't legislate to stop mates from betraying your confidence so think carefully before you give them your root password.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  191. Check your dictionary... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

    ... and look up 'oxymoron'. You got one right, "Jumbo shrimp".

    As for the others: Many people of both parties are hypocrites. All media is biased. Much media is liberally biased. Many professors are assholes.

  192. Howdy! by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    And telling people to sign up and cancel right away to avoid credit card charges is fraud

    When a company gives out a free trial offer, such as AOL, how is it fraud to terminate your account before the end of the trial offer to prevent charges? If you aren't satisfied with a companies services, of course you're going to terminate the account. You are not breaking your legal contract with this company, as they TOLD you it was a free trial offer.

    Conversly, companies who advertise through places such as FreeIpod.com know that a majority of people aren't going to remain active members at the end of their trial offer. But they still give FreeIpods.com $50-90 per person that freeipods.com sends their way because enough people stay and it's way cheaper than the billions they spend on TV advertising.

    Here's a neat wired article
    Here are some interesting quotes from that article:
    "Canoso also declined to specify the advertisers' bounties, but said they can range between $25 and $90, depending on the program and the kind of customer it attracts"

    and

    "Canoso said while $90 seems like a lot, it is peanuts compared to the millions spent on TV and magazine ads, which don't guarantee new customers."

    And of course, just in case I change my signature in the near future, if you would like a GMail invite, please help me get a FreeIpod. If I don't get an iPod, I'll let you know and will most definately help spread the word across the internet as a whole.

    Until then please mark no-freebie-for-u as a friend. I know I have ;)

  193. FREE iPod is very very true if not very cheap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure to READ THIS FULLY(before you click on link) IF YOU WANT A FREE I POD!!!! Dont bid on this!! PICTURE of PROOF of recieving a Free iPod is on the LEFT of the page, i swear to god this worked for us, two of my friends already got them and i should be getting one in a few days but its crazy how you can get i Pods for so cheap. you should try it soon but dont tell too many people right away. wait at least till you get yours first. just go to this site http://www.****iPods.com/?r=13755442 (type in "Free" before i-Pods) and sign up what I Pod you want. then u will have like 10 survey, u could say no to all of them. then u have to complete an offer but dont freak out, here is the SECRET. the block buster offer you can sign up for it and cancell it within two weeks and it wont cost a penny. and there are many other FREE TRIAL offers, however they take about 7 Dollars for shipment. and then u have to tell 5 of your friends to sign up. you can even pay for your friends Shipping and Handling when they sign up for the offer. that means 5*7=$35 dollars for an i Pod!!!!! you could turn around and sell it on ebay for $250 if you want. if you are skepticle about this ill tell you WHY THIS WORKS. this FREE i Pod web site basically gets money from companies to collect people(by giving away i Pods) like us to take the quick survey. and if you say YES to any of them u get an E-mail advertisment from them and they get customers that way. so click NO if you dont want junk mail. THEN they also get money from the companies to advertise and have people sign up for one of the offers in the end. the companies that are making the offers get there moneys worth by people who actually continue to subscribe one of the offers. if you are interested in continuing one of the offers, thats great. but if you are only interested in getting the i Pod thats fine too, because someone else would be interested in continuing the offer and that DOES NOT have to be you. thats why they give away free I pods to people because they know that attracts people to sign up. companies make money by advertising, the website makes money from attracting people, and we get are i-Pods.......everyone is happy! :) it might cost you some money before you complete it but it wont cost you more than 40 dollars i guarantee. one of my friend payed 12dollars total to get his mini ipod and my other friend got his for free i swear to my dead grandma. just try it out. its easier than u would think. If you have any questions let me know. Sign up for one of these offers, these ones will charge you the least.(I RECOMEND BlockBuster because its absolutely Free) I read ALL the FINE prints in the offers and these are what they charge. Block Buster Free trial is Absolutely FREE(you get to rent like 5 movies for free) if canceled within two weeks! make sure to cancell it as soon as posible. no S&H Free Video Professor(u get free computer learning soft ware) no cancellation required S&H is $6.95 Hydroderm free 14day trial is Free if you cancel within 2 weeks. S&H is $9.95 Feel Serenity 30day Free trial is Free. S&H is $5.95. make sure to cancel within 30days. TrimLife Trio, you get a bunch of diet samples for Free if canceled within 14days. S&H is $5.95 make sure to cancel. My Daily Dose Free 7day trial, cancel within 14days and will be free S&H is $5.95 People PC, they dont tell you how its a Free trial....... Applying for Credit Cards, you have to approve and make a purchase... GO get your i Pods!!!

  194. Free iPod scam I exposed in my state by adzoox · · Score: 1

    From my BLOG about helping to expose a spammer for "free" iPods in my home state

    Some people on this board are trying to legitimize the fact they received a "free" ipod, so they are all legit. They are NOT, not a single one of them. Their sole purpose is to harvest email. If you promote these services to ANYONE (even if you know how to skate the system by using dummy emails) you are doing us ALL an inservice by keeping them active!

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny