Slashdot Mirror


Mac mini Dissection

xbasque writes "Smash has a video showing the technique for cracking open a Mac mini safely. Upgrade the RAM and hard drive yourself and save a bundle (ain't that the point of the mini?)" And if you don't plan to take one apart yourself, parvenu74 points out the pictures of exploratory Mac mini surgery on mini-itx.com, writing "From a post: 'The board itself is slightly smaller than Mini-ITX at about 160mm square by our estimations, and includes Ethernet, Modem, DVI/VGA, 2 x USB, Firewire and Audio connectors (sadly not optical).'"

920 comments

  1. A buttload of Money by Hermes02 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'll just spring for the extra 500 bucks and have apple do it for me.....or just buy two whole stinkin' computers for the same price. Hmm....

    1. Re:A buttload of Money by tetromino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll just spring for the extra 500 bucks and have apple do it for me.....or just buy two whole stinkin' computers for the same price. Hmm....

      You can build two stinking x86 computers - or one very decent x86 computer, which would be my choice - for $500. If you know how to put parts together, you can easily make something that outperforms the mini. The problem is that 95% of the people out there don't build, but buy their machines from Dell, HP, etc. and $500 Dells suck badly. They come with Celerons and Intel Integrated graphics, they don't have Firewire or CD burners, and so the Mac mini looks reasonably competitive - especially if you value the aesthetics.

    2. Re:A buttload of Money by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or if you like OS X.

      or if you want a silent computer that doesnt overheat.

      for a good cheap comp though, nforce3 + athlon + ram + HD + cd/dvd + case probablly might end up coming out to around $500. But the computer definetly wont be the size of the mac mini, or as quiet.

    3. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's assuming that the size is an advantage for this crowd, when most users would rather have the slots and an accessible case.

      Don't kid yourself, the size is more of a justifcation for a crippled low-end Mac than a feature.

    4. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $500 you can built a top-spec Athlon64 rig. No matter how much you might like OSX, the advantage of speed in linux or windows has to eclipse that.

    5. Re:A buttload of Money by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      here, in europe, in finland, for 70 euros less than the mac mini entry.. you would get amd sempron 2800+, 256mb, floppy drive, dvd drive, 40gb hd, gf4mx, nic, kb, mouse, 6 usb slots, on board sound....

      but when you consider non-expandibility a plus then of course mac mini wins because it has no free agp slot, no free pci slots, no free hd slots, no free ddr slots.. the extra memory for the hp would be a lot cheaper.. and you could actually turn it into a gaming rig by buying a proper gfx card.

      but the whole argument is moot.. BECAUSE the consumer that goes out into the local best buy equivalent won't ever even SEE a mac mini, won't ever see one advert for it and so for him it does not exist - and if he would know it to exist and would compare them side to side and wasn't looking for something that you can fit in a cars cd player slot... and for someone looking deliberetaly for a mac the pc isn't a real option anyways.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:A buttload of Money by arodland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But to a geek, small and quiet are generally "luxury" options. Given the extra $500, the geek isn't going to buy the computer equivalent of leather seats, he's going to get the turbos.

    7. Re:A buttload of Money by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah speed if your encoding video or playing games. For day to day computer use, the mac mini is beyond perfect.

      Plus the noise of pcs is horrid, my friend just recently built an athlon 64 rig with a nforce 3, and it is loud... so loud he had to get an even louder fan because it was running too hot. My PC is also very very loud, a P4 2.53ghz. My ibook on the otherhand, is dead silent which I love.

    8. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but the whole argument is moot..

      Yes, it is. Your AMD Sempron system won't run OS X. That is the ultimate and unavoidable point of any argument about the Mac mini versus a cheap PC.

    9. Re:A buttload of Money by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      That is called "picking loud parts" and "not reading up on things before hand" and "bad design". Go find a Dell and listen to it, nothing is keeping you from having a computer which is just as quite or quieter. Granted you can't sue the .50c "extra powerful" fans you find on sale or any random power supply. Instead you need to use big and slow fans and a large heatsink designed for such fans (which do add a bit of cost). You also have to use quite hard drives and a power supply with a similar large and slow fan.

      Don't blame the components for your own bad decisions.

    10. Re:A buttload of Money by Brian+Brian · · Score: 1

      I understand your arguement. But isn't it funny that you never hear anyone say "Why $30K for a car. I can build 10 cheap ones for that price. Or I can build 2 great ones for that price."

    11. Re:A buttload of Money by MoneyT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Untill you get to thinking about the slots and what you need them for. Example, my PC sitting here has 5 PCI slots and 1 AGP slot.

      The AGP slot is occupied by a video card, which I just recently replaced for the first time in 5 years. On the mac mini, that's already built onto the board with an ATI chipset.

      1 PCI slot is used by my Soudblaster card, which I just recently upgraded, again for the first time in 5 years, and that was because the card never worked right in the first place and this happened to be the time I was upgrading things. On the mac mini, this is built into the system

      1 PCI slot is occupied by an ethernet card, un upgraded in 5 years. Gigabit is built into the mac mini

      1 slot contains a USB/Firewire card, again, un upgraded, and built into the mac mini.

      The other two slots remain unused, and for the forseeable future, I have no use for them. In the end, they're actualy a waste.

      So when I look at the mac mini, it has everything I would use PCI/AGP slots for built in.

      So then the question becomes well what if you want to upgrade?

      Well, when I did my mass upgrade for the first time in 5 years (until now, I had only added RAM), I bought a new motherboard, a new processor, new graphics card, new soundcard and new RAM. My total cost came out to about $600 after rebates.

      After reflecting on this, it occurs to me, that if a mac mini suits my needs, by the time I would decide to upgrade it, I might as well just buy a new one for $500.

      In fact, for the first time, my computer would actualy be a disposable product. Something that I could (theoreticaly) just discard and buy a new one when it no longer served my needs, and it would be roughly price equivilant to upgrading the system.

      So in the end, having PCI slots and an accessable case on the mac mini would seem to be more of a waste than a benefit.

      Of course, you can always argue that hard core gamers and power users have other things and upgrade more frequently, but I argue that no hardcore gamer/power user is buying a $500 computer.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:A buttload of Money by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *Yes, it is. Your AMD Sempron system won't run OS X. That is the ultimate and unavoidable point of any argument about the Mac mini versus a cheap PC.
      [ Reply to This ]*

      no shit? "and for someone looking deliberetaly for a mac the pc isn't a real option anyways."

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the ultimate and unavoidable point about OS X is that doesn't have near the selection of software as found on Windows.

    14. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if you're doing a lot of driving, then a comfortable car is nice, but a Q45 for a 50+mile daily commute is kind of a waste, imho, but I guess I actually like *DRIVING* my car, and not feeling like I'm Da Man because I have $50K to pop on a car. In rush-hour traffic, the Q45 is as drivable as a Ford Excrushion, Cadillac Expletive, Porshce Ancho, etc., as that cheap-ass rusted out, dented Chevy Metro. As long as the heater/AC work and the stereo, it's all good.

    15. Re:A buttload of Money by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's a crazy, mixed-up suggestion.

      Howzabout you buy a computer instead of hand-carving your own microchips?

      People love to talk about how you can build a top-flight desktop computer for $3.25 plus two subway tokens and some kind of weird-ass coin that you dug out of your sofa that's got "Røølï" written on it, but what they curiously omit is the fact that if you took all the time you'd spend gathering parts and assembling them and worked a minimum-wage job at some fast food place instead, you'd earn hundreds of dollars. So the real cost of this "It's Shake-n-Bake, and I helped!" special is, in fact, several times higher than the sum of the price tags on the hundreds of inscrutable parts that went into it.

      People who say "I can build that for less" are either not bothering to account for their time or just flat-out lying, because the plain truth of the matter is that if they could, somebody already would have, and you'd be able to just go out to a 7-11 and buy the damn thing for half off with the purchase of a medium or large fountain drink.

    16. Re:A buttload of Money by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      People don't always use price as the purchasing argument. If they did no one would ever buy a new (BMW) Mini but would by a cheap Renault say instead.

      Yes the Mac Mini isn't expandable. But I built my last PC. I built it to be as expandable as possible. Even so, if I were to upgrade it I would have to atleast buy a whole new motherboard, processor and memory because my current board wont take anything now available. Last time I upgraded I had to replace the power supply because it wasn't powerful enough for the new innards.

      If I was buying a cheap pre built machine I would get some crap cheap and nasty monitor and probably keyboard. The build quality of PCs isn't good either, and they are noisy in operation. I would also be paying for Windows which I don't want anyway as I run Linux on PCs. You do get shed loads of software with the Mac.

      Our local Apple store is right in the heart of the city by a major thoroughfare. There are always people in there and not just Apple fans. Admittedly many of them are looking at iPods but if the Mac Mini is on show there, I know they will look at it. Also, as far as I am aware, the UK's largest chain of PC wharehouse stores still sells Macs (although I would never buy there).

      In the end I could update my PC which needs updating, or buy a Mac Mini to sit on top of my aged blue and white G3 (which I bought second hand just to have an OS-X machine). The latter sounds more appealing to me.

    17. Re:A buttload of Money by bluekanoodle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I call BS. You show me a a complete amd64 you can build for $500. I know I spent over 900 building mine last month.

    18. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but when you consider non-expandibility a plus then of course mac mini wins because it has no free agp slot, no free pci slots, no free hd slots, no free ddr slots

      But it will fit in my stereo cabinet. It will easily handle the storage, playback and burning of my home movies. I can leave it running because it sleeps properly. When I'm using it, it won't sound like a jet turbine and isn't a fire hazard. I can upgrade the storage using $20 firewire caddies with $50 hard drives, and install 1 gig of RAM for $100.

      OH, and (without wasting time reading about it) I can be sure that the wireless card isn't a Belkin PLX bridged piece of trash that locks up my computer every 5 minutes. And if I ever have a problem, there's a shop down the street that will fix it under warranty without me having to spend 2 days pulling a grey box to pieces.

      But I see your point. If you enjoy spending time keeping your computer running, the Mac would definately be less fun.

    19. Re:A buttload of Money by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. You price me a top-spec Athlon 64 computer for $500.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    20. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      Gigabit is built into the mac mini

      Oh? That's not what Apple says.

      All you fan bois need to get over it. You can easily spend the same amount on a PC and get a far superior computer in terms of expandibility, speed, value, capability. Coming up with lame examples that 'prove' it isn't possible (not what this parent poster did, but many others did) just makes you look like pissy whiners who don't let reality get in your way.

      Face it, the Mac mini is nice in a lot of ways, and I plan to get one, but it is nice for reasons other than expandibility, speed, and yes, value as most would see it.

      If you want something (hopefully) quiet and small and reasonably capable then this makes lots of sense. Hopefully it doesn't use too much power. I just wish it had gigabit ethernet, I could use it.

    21. Re:A buttload of Money by Retric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have been thinking of picking up one of these mostly for it's size. And the fact I miss having a mac in my pc room.

      Once you start having 4 or 5+ pc's they start to take up a lot of space. And as far as upgrading things goes once your on a giga bit lan and have a TB+ disk storage you tend to slow down how much you open cases on anything other than a gaming rig.

      Let's see there is the Gamming rig, 2nd pc (as in your upgrading fast enough that your leftovers tend to make a PC), Server 1 (Mostly web stuff but it can handle games for lan party's now and then.), Sever 2 Disk Space (5x 250gig in rad 5 for storage and a 60 gig drive for the OS), Old SUN box from ebay, iMac for MP3's in the living room, Laptop, and then the old junk that's now powered up but still takes up space...

      Starting to wonder if I am ever going to go under 200$ electric bill again... probably not.

    22. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but I argue that no hardcore gamer/power user is buying a $500 computer

      You can actually get a quite decent game system for about $600-$700 (the same as a MacMini in a reasonable shipping config), and it won't have any annoying limitations like a CPU that was out of date 3 years ago or no expansion.

    23. Re:A buttload of Money by Retric · · Score: 1

      I find there is more mac software I would like to run on windows than the other way around but that's just me.

    24. Re:A buttload of Money by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Please build me an X86 machine with the same general specs as the Mac Mini for US$500 and fit it in a case thats 6" X 6" X 2.5".

      OK....?

      OK?

      Hello?

      You still there?

      Hello?

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    25. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You can build two stinking x86 computers

      You said it yourself. You could build two x86 computers, which will stink compared to the Mac mini.

      It had to be said...

    26. Re:A buttload of Money by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
      Face it you are not the target market. Im sure you swap linux distro's every other day, and ever want a computer that 'Just works".. Most people that are so quick to put down OSX will never try it, thinking it has something to do with os1-9.

      Deal with it, while you are running a glorified 386, and a minix v2 kernel, the rest of us are going to get RISC workstations, with the latest & greatest from NeXT.

      Hope you enjoy those Apples.

    27. Re:A buttload of Money by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You're right, I forgot apple stopped putting gigabit in all the G4s. That said, the point still stands, for the purpose the mini serves, it's an excelent computer. And I will argue that while you may be able to get a superior computer in some respects for the same price point, you can't get a FAR superior computer in all of those areas for the same price point.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    28. Re:A buttload of Money by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
      Are you sure they wont see it, like the iPods?

      This little guy is going to sneak in all over.... But it's still early.

    29. Re:A buttload of Money by memco · · Score: 1

      In what way? Sure there aren't tons of free half done MMORPGS for it, but I can't think of anything (practical) that a PC has that a mac doesn't have. They have games, office tools, graphics progs, audio editing, video editing, p2p, chat. What do you want? Since mac is BSD there is tons of OS stuff that has become available to them as well: Openoffice, Blender, Gimp, etc. I think someones just jealous.

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
    30. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh.. sad, sad americans..

    31. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? How many *nix apps run natively on Windows? There's millions of them, you know.

    32. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a point of pride -- it's a hobby. Besides, free time isn't worth money, you're not working. Sometimes the pride of hunting for components and assembling itself is the reward. Anyone can buy a computer, but only you can build your own.

    33. Re:A buttload of Money by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      The mac mini is a "decent" game system. Maybe a bit underpowered for what you could get from the PC side of things, but if my experience in upgrading this PC is any indication, you're not getting any powerhouses for $600

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    34. Re:A buttload of Money by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
      Where? Id love to see where you get the 4000+'s for $500.00 USD!!!!

      Not to Mention Im sure your 'top of the line' AMD fits in a 6" x 6" x 2.5" case right?

      I call BS on this one.

    35. Re:A buttload of Money by Harry+Balls · · Score: 1
      Athlon64 + motherboard at Fry's (on sale) ... $200
      120GB harddisk ... $70
      case and power supply ... $30
      512 MB RAM ... $80
      video card ... $120 (I refuse to buy $400 video cards, sorry)

      The satisfaction of having built your own computer ... priceless

    36. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny post, but his advice was "get a Dell, they're quiet", not BYOB.

    37. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot something very, very important. That supposed cheaper, faster, better x86 machine would also need all the software to do all the stuff the Mac mini can do out of the box. While you can build a PC cheaper that is faster, it won't be as small. If you go for small form factor, you lose performance(shared video memory) and the price is at least 1/3 more than the Mac mini. But those prices are with no software. Or very minimal. I guess all the PC people assume that everyone piratst stuff. But they miss the fact that the software that Apple includes is first rate software, not cheap, buggy, crippled crap that you get in the PC world.

    38. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people that are so quick to put down OSX will never try it, thinking it has something to do with os1-9.

      We* have nothing against OS X. What we dislike is the ridiculously overpriced vendor-lock-in hardware and completely lacking extensibility that Stevie is selling you.

      * with "we", I mean the heteros.

    39. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually just ordered a system for $650 -- A64-2800, 512MB, Radeon 95-something. Might not be a powerhouse, but probably has 3x the CPU as the macmini and won't have trouble with Doom3.

    40. Re:A buttload of Money by MendicantMonkey · · Score: 1

      Check the barebones systems at MWAVE.COM, you can configure a barebones with an Athlon 64 2800+ on a KM800 motherboard with 256 MB RAM in a cheap case with enough $ left for a cheap hard drive and maybe even a copy of Windows XP Home. (OEM, but you ARE building the machine.) Granted, you are taking the minimums on everything, but it can make it under $500. Use a downloaded Linux distro instead of XP and it's under $400.

    41. Re:A buttload of Money by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Unless, like me, he's already got the turbos in another car.

      Oh, wait, I guess if I don't conform to your stereotype, I must not be a geek.

      My bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    42. Re:A buttload of Money by MendicantMonkey · · Score: 1

      Sorry, missed the grandparent -- this system is NOT top spec.

    43. Re:A buttload of Money by mig0 · · Score: 1

      From Newegg:

      Case- $ 52 (Antec SLK2600AMB)
      MB $ 99 (EPoX EP-9NDA3J nf3 ultra)
      AMD 2800 $128 (retail)
      512 mb $ 59 (wintec pc2700)
      40gb HD $ 46
      Optical $ 31 (DVD-Rom with CDRW)
      Video $ 32 (MX4000 64 MB)
      ---
      $418. Plus shipping and assembly (and windows) not included. (Apple is offering free shipping).
      But I wouldn't call this "top spec".

    44. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there's lots of small publisher titles that are "just like" some big name (practical) Windows package. Maybe. Plus every little utility is $30 shareware, and if PC users come up with something cool (like watching DiVX movies), it takes 2 years befor it's ported.

      Openoffice, Blender, Gimp -- all run Native on Windows, not through some cheez X11 layer. Way to prove my point.

      As for jealousy, I have a few Macs, and only find them more useful than Windows for DV editing and maybe photoshop.

    45. Re:A buttload of Money by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Right, because most people are really interested in perusing AnandTech to find quiet parts that won't melt your processor.

      Don't blame the people who buy Mac minis for having a different set of criteria for what makes a good computer than you do.

      Apple has designed a small, quiet, CHEAP computer, and you're whining that it's not small quiet and cheap enough. I really would like to see you do better.

      Oh yeah, and don't forget to include a decent consumer-level video editing app in the price. (oooh, that means no Linux. Damn. There goes your budget.)

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    46. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that hardly qualifies as a "topspec" amd64

    47. Re:A buttload of Money by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
      Ha Ha very funny, how original...

      Enjoy your 386, caveman.

    48. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1
      but what they curiously omit is the fact that if you took all the time you'd spend gathering parts and assembling them and worked a minimum-wage job at some fast food place instead, you'd earn hundreds of dollars.

      Yeah right, maybe if you're sitting around and counting the time it takes to ship it...

      I can order all the necessary parts for a computer in about 15 minutes, and build the entire thing in well under an hour. That includes everything, from opening the packaging, to spreading the heatsink grease, to tightening the last screw. I know this, because I personally built hundreds of computers at a former job.

      Unless they are seriously crippled, anyone can put together a computer in very little time. You'd have to work at a fast food place for about 40 hours (a full week) to make $200.

      First of all, since putting a computer together is likely to save you more than $200, it's a good deal even if it takes you that long to put it together.

      Second, who in the hell takes 40 hours to put a computer together? You're likely going to spend 2 hours (at max) to put it together, or about $10.

      The time it take to comparison shop for the individual parts should not be included, for the very simple reason that you'd be using at least as much time to compare between different models of PCs anyhow. Besides, pricewatch is a nice site, which allows you to do all the necessary comparisons in just a few minutes.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    49. Re:A buttload of Money by willfe · · Score: 1

      Er, well, yeah, because I can walk to any number of local commodity shops and buy 100% of what I need to put a PC together in a couple of hours. I can do the actual work with nothing more than the parts, a screwdriver, and a couple power outlets.

      Should I decide "I'm going to build myself a car today!" I've got decidedly more work laid out ahead of me. And I'd better be damned good with that screwdriver...

      --
      Read my stuff.
    50. Re:A buttload of Money by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "sempron 2800+, 256mb, floppy drive, dvd drive, 40gb hd, gf4mx, nic, kb, mouse, 6 usb slots, on board sound...."

      So you get a slightly faster processor, that also works as a space heater. Woo. My trousers are totally moist. Not.

      "the extra memory for the hp would be a lot cheaper"

      WTF? DDR 2700. It comes free in boxes of Cheerios. What are you talking about?

      Wait a tick. Are you seriously wanting people to buy an Hewlett Packard PC? Now I KNOW you're high.

      Repeat after me. Most users never upgrade their computers. They want to take it out of the box and have it work. If you have a different agenda, buy a different computer.

      But you won't get iMovie, which kicks ass. My dad asked me about how to upgrade his PC to do video editing. I told him to go to the Apple store and give them $500. Upgrade complete.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    51. Re:A buttload of Money by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      Why $30K for a car. [sic] I can build 10 cheap ones for that price. Or I can build 2 great ones for that price.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    52. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the apple ipod too and also people searchers. I think we should all get some booty at GroovyBooty. My Favorite Free People Finder and Free People Search Directory.

      Free People Search and People Finder - It's the people finder of choice for addresses, phone numbers, and satellte photos.

      I also found a PeopleBot.net People Finder to be a nice search tool. I was able to locate public records and last known addresses and birth days and addresses of people who were my classmates and were lost relatives.

      Cheers!

    53. Re:A buttload of Money by willfe · · Score: 1

      Then again, neither is the baby Mac being discussed here :)

      --
      Read my stuff.
    54. Re:A buttload of Money by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could build a PC for that kind of money, but not at the size of the mini. Build a shuttle for $500? I think not. Also, when your PC manages to die, will it have one-stop shopping for a warranty? Apple may not be the greatest thing in the world for qc *coughibookcough* but you're not going to be building a comperable machine that will have tech support of any kind.

    55. Re:A buttload of Money by aichpvee · · Score: 0
      You mac guys always seem to forget that most of us don't run macs because we DO NOT LIKE THEM. It's not the price, since if we're in this game for over priced OEM boxen anyway (I'm not) then we're already paying too much. It's just a question of how "much too" much we are going to be paying.

      And unlike something like Linux, most people have actually used macs and still choose to use something else. I think it really says something that most of them still choose to use windows, as shitty as it may be.

      I welcome all of you mac addicts' trolling and attempted flamebaiting in response.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    56. Re:A buttload of Money by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      it's 6.5" x 6.5" x 2"

      Anyways if you let me go 7" x 7" x 2.5" then you can build a mini-itx system for about $50 cheaper. (the really small cases are quite expensive, the rest of the parts are really cheap).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    57. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of 386s, didn't they come out about the same time as the PowerPC G4? Same century anyway.

    58. Re:A buttload of Money by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Not if you want processing power without noise in a small formfactor... then you have to go the Pentium-M route and aPentium-M combined with a fitting motherboard is more expensive than the whole Apple... The only way you can be cheaper than the apple is if you go the C3 self building route, but the C3 is slow. If you go for an Effizeon with a decent mobo you are still slower than Apple but you reach the same pricerange (I am not counting the soft in, because you can use Linux)

    59. Re:A buttload of Money by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I disagree. My brother in law bought a Dell just before Christmas on special and for around 500$ it came with a cheap monitor, a dvd+r recorder (probably getting rid of these), an AIO printer and the computer came with a 2.4 GHz proc with 256 megs of ram.

      It didn't have firewire, but we found a via based one down at a computer shop for 20$ and it works just fine.

    60. Re:A buttload of Money by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      wow! you can put the mobo in (3 mintues) and the CPU (1 mintue) and the RAM (30 seconds) and expansion cards (2-5 minutes) and HD/Optical Drive (5-7 minutes) *AND INSTALL AN OS AND APPS* (3 hours) in 15 minutes?! please tell me what timewarp you use. i'd love to show my boss.

      (don't forget about my mirror of the video that has dropped off to the second page...)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    61. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1
      nforce3 + athlon + ram + HD + cd/dvd + case probablly might end up coming out to around $500.

      You must be kidding. It would come out under $200 to get something comparable to the Mac mini (256MB RAM, 40GB HDD, etc.)

      $500. But the computer definetly wont be the size of the mac mini, or as quiet.

      For well-under $500 I certainly could put together a nice fanless mini-ATX PC.

      I don't understand why so many people have gotten selective amnesia all of a sudden (and get modded up for it).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    62. Re:A buttload of Money by tigersha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speak for yourself. "Most people" are not Slashdot techies who spend hours faffing around with their machines.

      I have a car and I certainly do not spend half of my life messing around with the engine to squeeze 5% out of the thing. I use it to drive around. Same for most people and computers.

      Besides, I am by this time sick and tired of having to maintain a lot of half-assed home-built computers. The waste of time is not really worth it.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    63. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. I just upgraded my gaming rig for under 600.

      Athlon 3200 939 - $190
      Motherboard $150
      1gig ballistix $240

      Note you could get generic ram for half that price. My video card/case/harddrive/ps did not need replacing(I love being able to pick and choose what to upgrade)
      Not to diss the mac mini. I think it is one of the coolest looking computers ever. And I am glad to finally see apple put out a computer at a more resonable price.

    64. Re:A buttload of Money by Gumph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would say that depends, firstly I am a geek and yet I value the aesthetics of Apple, plus it helps to 'sell the idea' to the wife (no obv jokes please - I am not self delusional) in this case small and quiet are good points.
      If the box is in your bedroom then quiet is certaibnly a good point as no doubt it will be on 24/7 either searching for ET or folding or rendering or whatever. Plus it is the perfect size for a media centre another plus point and if you want to get ubergeeky it is the perfect size to make a damn big cluster without needing an airplane hangar to house all the nodes in. Imagine 16 Dell boxes stacked up on top of each other - urrghh sorry bad mental imagine, my brain now needs a clean.

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    65. Re:A buttload of Money by raodin · · Score: 1

      So you get a slightly faster processor, that also works as a space heater. Woo. My trousers are totally moist. Not.

      When was the last time you used an ~60W space heater? Oh right, never.

    66. Re:A buttload of Money by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Rome wasn't built in a day...but I wasn't on that job.

    67. Re:A buttload of Money by squeee · · Score: 1

      "unlike something like Linux, most people have actually used macs and still choose to use something else" Maybe true in america, but in the UK Macs are like hens teeth, no one uses them, no one wants them, and if you do have one, it's impossible to buy software, as no one sells them here.

    68. Re:A buttload of Money by damsa · · Score: 1

      Mini-Atx is a lot bigger than a Mini Mac. Try again please.

    69. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. No DVD/CD-R.
      A 300W (minimum for an AMD system) power supply with it's on (LOUD) fan.

      No case fan, which you desperately need for that sucker. Believe me, I could fry eggs on my Athlon box.

      No firewire.

      Does that el-cheapo $200 motherboard+Athlon combo (you specified neither manufacturer nor specs) offer USB2, a decent sound card, a modem (not a "Winmodem" but a proper modem)?

      Once I add the case fan (which you forgot), the CPU fan (which is also a must, but I pray that Fry's had the sense to at least include that in the bundle), the video card fan, and fire it up along with the power supply fan, will I need to install it in a separate, sound-insulated room, just to hear myself think?

      To review:

      Mobo + CPU: $200 (I'll take your word for it, and assume CPU fan is included)

      HD: $70

      A *reliable* power supply and a case which does not require you to bend ATX boards to fit because the friggen screw holes don't line up properly, nor anything else: $70

      512 MB 2700 DDR RAM: $64 (there's a sale at Microcenter, so I was able to do even better than you)

      ATI Raedon 9200 w/256 MB: $79 (cheaper that you thought, again)

      Firewire card: $30

      tornado case fan: $8

      End cost: $521 plus shipping costs for most of these items, since I looked at cheap mail order companies. Estimate about $540.

      Not bad. Of course, the you will feel like you are living on the tarmac of an aircraft carrier from all the noise, and can't run OS X... but think of the massive savings!

    70. Re:A buttload of Money by 10Ghz · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, the Mac Mini does NOT have gigabit built-in, it has 100baseT, which is going to start feeling like a 14.4 modem in just a couple years.


      So, you claim that we will basically require Gigabit Ethernet in just few yeas? Funny, this workstation I'm currently on is hooked to a 10MB hub, and I can use it just fine. Yes, that includes accessing files on the server. Are you one of those who think that "Gigabit Ehternet makes my internet faster"?

      100BaseT is more than enough for intended uses of the Mini. You can find gigabit in higher-end models and on servers. Mini has no real need for it.

      Probably Firewire400 and USB1.1 right?


      Seriously: have you even looked at the specs of the Mini? it says in plain English: "One FireWire 400 port; two USB 2.0 ports"!. Yes, the Firewire is only 400. But how many PC's have 800? How many low-end PC's have Firewire at all? How many devices/apps require Firewire 800?

      If these mini macs just had even just 2 PCI slots, I'd be willing to buy one.


      If the Mini had those two slots, you would just find some other flaw in it. Seriously, you cannot satisfy everyone.

      The ability to change devices is the difference between a computer anyone can continue using for years, and a computer that becomes useless after 2 years because one minor component fails and there's no way to replace it.


      Instead of upgrading your machine every two years, you can simply buy a new Mini every two years. End-result is more or less the same, as is the expense.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    71. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > No, you aren't going to find any videocards that plug-in through Firewire... You're just screwed, and have a Mac that won't work. I've seen on-board videocards fail quite often, but luckily, PCs always have the capability to use a PCI/AGP card rather than the onboard, so they aren't trash when that one component fails.

      This is just pure bullshit. I have never ever seen in my life *real* onboard video fail, and I've had to admin a lot of different machines from Sparc IPX's (onboard cg6) to DEC Multias (onboard DEC21030 gfx chip + a couple of VRAM chips) to Sun Ultra 5's (basic Mach64 chips there iirc) and having something soldered on your motherboard is just, plainly stating, the most reliable way of building computers. Of course, bad design (inadequate cooling, etc.) can damage these builtin chips just in the same way as on a PCI/AGP card.

      I'd take an integrated-to-motherboard Radeon 9200 chip any day over a clunky and creaky AGP board. This is especially well understood in companies who make special-purpose PCs that have to endure hardship, vibrations etc.

      Then again I guess my 3D needs are so conservative that I'm quite happy with anything that just *works* and consumes as little power as possible.

    72. Re:A buttload of Money by wattersa · · Score: 1

      AMD64 3500+ 2.2 GHz
      Abit AV8 mb (Via-based), gigabit, sound, S/PDIF, 1394, USB2, etc.
      nVidia 6800GT AGP
      512 MB RAM, Fry's house brand
      Seagate serial ATA 80 GB HD
      Pioneer DVR-107 DVD-R
      Aspire X-Dreamer case
      Fedora Core 3 and Win98

      $950. I think I'll pass on the Mac Mini for now.

    73. Re:A buttload of Money by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      People who say "I can build that for less" are either not bothering to account for their time or just flat-out lying

      Really? I can build it for less, and I can do it in an hour. Including the time it takes me to go and get the parts from the computer shop 3 miles from my house. Perhaps your construction abilities are taxed to the point of exhaustion over acquiring parts and assembling them, but don't make that generalization for everyone.

    74. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shitty Mobo... shitty HD... really, really shitty case... no firewire... no modem... you need a case fan... and OOPS, no power supply.

      Good luck running Windows and/or Linux on that thing. Most PC's need electricity.

      That system, with a good $40 power supply and a copy of Windows XP (not the home crapola... actual XP), will cost you well over $600.

      Then again, this is Slashdot, so let's pretend it's a Linux-only box (while installing a stolen copy of Windows from the office on the second partition), and say it's a mere $458 plus shipping for that steaming brown clumpy nutty pile of moist crap.

      I think I'll stick with the mini, thanks.

    75. Re:A buttload of Money by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      And is loud as hell and sucks energy like a motor

    76. Re:A buttload of Money by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Deal with it, while you are running a glorified 386, and a minix v2 kernel, the rest of us are going to get RISC workstations, with the latest & greatest from NeXT.


      There's nothing really wrong witht he Linux-kernel. OS X might have some uber-leet whiz-bang microkernel, but that alone doesn't make it somehow "better". And come to think of it, Minix has a microkernel, as does OS X. Linux is a monolithic kernel. So it would be more accurate to say that OS X is the one with "Minix v2 kernel", and not Linux ;).

      And being RISC doesn't automatically make the system better either. I remember just few years ago Apple was having it's ass handed in a platter by Intel/AMD, even though they were just "glofied 386's", while Apple used RISC. How is that possible? I mean, Apple used RISC, so surely they must be better? Today Apple is competetive again, but they are not mopping the floor with those "glorified 386's". Besides, I can run Linux just fine on that uber-leet RISC-hardware ;).

      FWIW: I'm planning to buy the Mini. To give OS X a try. And if it's not for me, I could use another box to play around with.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    77. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree assembly of the components can be done in under an hour, in practice this doesn't always work out. Plenty of times I've put everything in plugged it in, turned it on, and... nothing.

      Realistically though, for me to build a machine from scratch, including all the software I'd need to equal a mini-mac in functionality would take on the order of 3-4 hours. This includes installing windows, office, Virus scanner, XP patches, new web browser, email client etc, etc, etc. Putting the parts in a case for under $500 in under an hour doesn't give you a full computer, it does need software, the mini mac comes with this installed so you need to include this in your build time.

      Also with your machine will likely need drivers for any devices you have. My experience with XP has been that it is better, most things work after a minute or so and some "New Hardware Found Dialogs" others need to have CDs inserted before devices are connected and do all sorts of crazy things if you do it out of order forcing you to start again. My experience with OS X has been, things just work. Things work that you don't expect to work, first time with no complaints. (this is my experience ymmv, I have only ever needed one driver on OSX).

      I just did a complete re-install of a XP machine on Sunday and it took 3.5 hours to get all the software on there. Granted the machine is old and slow, but it still took all that time, and the only part I put in was a new hard drive which took 5 mins tops.

      Finally with the mac you get a complete warranty. My mother lives 5000KM and a flight away (or a long swim across the North Atlantic). I could build her a PC some time I'm home that might be slightly higher spec, I could install pirated software to save a little on that side and further up the spec. What happens if/when something in it fails? Sure there is a warranty on the bits, but she has to figure out which bits are broken, get them out and send them back to wherever it is I got that bit cheapest from. Alternatively I could say "go to www.apple.com and buy a mini mac". Which do you think I'll be telling my mother to do?

    78. Re:A buttload of Money by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      wow! you can put the mobo in (3 mintues) and the CPU (1 mintue) and the RAM (30 seconds) and expansion cards (2-5 minutes) and HD/Optical Drive (5-7 minutes) *AND INSTALL AN OS AND APPS* (3 hours)

      Installing the hardware in 15 minutes is a little tight, but doable.

      As for the OS, XP practically installs itself, so start the install and walk away. Come back later, answer a half dozen dialogs, and you're done. Apps are apps no matter what computer you buy. Unless of course Apple is bundling Photoshop and Office these days for $499...

      But if speedy installs are important to your boss, indicating it may be something you folks need to do on a regular basis, may I suggest you introduce him/her to Ghost? It lets us re-image a workstation in under 20 minutes from a portable hard drive.

    79. Re:A buttload of Money by andreMA · · Score: 1
      It is Firewire 400, but USB 2.0

      Gigabit would have been nice, sure. But consider the target audience. I don't think they're going to be moving huge files around locally often enough that 100baseT is much of an inconvenience. And would someone in the market for a $500 box pay for a connection that would come close to saturating 100bT, even if it were available to them?

      As to component failure, you have a valid point. I've personally had luck with the hardware Apple uses... a 13 year old LC-II, a Quadra 650 (maybe 8 years? I bought it used), one of the first dual-500MHz G4's, and a 400MHz G3 Powerbook (4+ years). The first two were simply retired after many years of use without anything failing; The G4 is also fine except that one of 3 SCSI disk drives died after 3 years of 24/7 use, and the PowerBook died through my own fault*. The dual G4 is still my primary machine.

      Whether they cut corners on the quality of the components in the Mini to save money is an open question, though.

      *After dropping the removable DVD/CD drive, I used it without checking it carefully enough for damage; it shed springs and small screws onto the motherboard which made it very unhappy. That machine had been through airline Hell as well, though.

    80. Re:A buttload of Money by KingArthur10 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe that the parent was trying to simply state that for the AVERAGE user, a $500 computer replaced every two years is still more convienent than a computer that they have to upgrade. Yes, power users who want to run on Windows will inevitably say that they can upgrade for cheap b/c they can do it themselves, but the target audience isn't those power users, but rather the person who knows little about computers and would thus have to take it in to get upgraded in a computer shop for an extra $100 plus parts, which will be more than they really need, but they will get scammed into getting it. Considering I still don't have an internet connection that I can download from at 10-baseT, I don't see the need for a HOME computer needing anything more than 100 baseT within the estimated product lifetime. True there are some bad points to the mini, but to the target audience, this computer will be ideal! I work phone tech support for Cox communications, and guess what, we almost NEVER get a call about internet not working on a mac. The only mac calls we get are people setting up their accounts for the first time (which has actualluy been increasing). This computer is targeted to those who don't want ot worry about virii, spy ware, etc (I know they exist for the mac, but on a much smaller scale) and don't want to worry abotu driver conflicts b/c they now have an OS that is designed around/with the hardware.

      just my two cents.

      --
      I came, I saw, She conquered.
    81. Re:A buttload of Money by beelsebob · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, you're now left with no motherboard and no optical drive, so no ability to install any OS on it.

      :/ As the man said.... BULLSHIT!

    82. Re:A buttload of Money by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1
      last time i upgraded my machine, i only spent about 300 bucks total. if im going to spend over 500 on upgrades, ill just build a new system thatll be faster.

      macs really target a different audience. they cater to sleekness and ease-of-use, while PCs cater to power and control. i wish people would stop comparing them.

    83. Re:A buttload of Money by klui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh. Just because you can plug in a GbE or FW800 into a PC doesn't mean you should. Try doing that on a PC with 32-bit PCI slots and see your bandwidth disappear once you use your GbE, FW, and sound (if you have a card) together. Do it only if you have 66MHz, PCI-X, or PCIe. And if you get a cheap mobo where its GbE is run through the PCI bus, you'd really be crying for more bandwidth. The mini has USB 2.0 high speed (or was that full speed, well, it's the faster speed) ports.

    84. Re:A buttload of Money by Flaming+Foobar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When the onboard fails, you're pretty-well screwed.

      I've been using PC's since the 80286 (my first one actually had a 8088 in it, but it was old by then). I don't even want to start counting how many PC's I've owned since then. Suffice to say that currently I have six Windows machines and a dual G4 Mac.

      FWIW, with the exception of hard disks, never ever have I had only one component fail on me. And believe me, after 20 years and god-knows how many systems later I've had my fair share of failures. Last time some broke, I lost a mobo, a processor, two network cards, a hard drive and a video card. I have no idea which one went first, they were all fried.

      --
      while true;do echo -e -n "\033[s\n\033[u\134_\033[B";done
    85. Re:A buttload of Money by Chas · · Score: 1

      Here's two words for you.

      UNATTENDED INSTALL.

      Set up, point it at the answer file, and walk away.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    86. Re:A buttload of Money by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The mac mini is a "decent" game system.

      Sorry, you're wrong here - Macs are just not gaming machines, unfortunately. Many games are never ported to the Mac platform (e.g. Halflife), most are ported months or years after the initial x86 release, new games require faster Macs than what us mortals can afford, and old games aren't Mac OS X native so they run (poorly) under emulation.

      And I say this as a long-time Mac lover, typing this on my iBook G4 which I love dearly, but on which Warcraft 3 is slow, UT runs in Classic (which doesn't seem to support multiple mouse buttons), Quake 3 also runs in Classic because the native port is even worse, and the UT2k4 demo doesn't even render the title screen correctly. Granted, this machine is nearly a year old now; perhaps a Mac mini would fare better with newer games (and the Classic issue should now be moot). Even still, Counterstrike isn't going to happen. I've been using Macs seriously since System 6, but I can't recommend them as a gaming platform until more game developers take the platform seriously, doing side-by-side development and releasing dual-platform hybrid CDs (a few do this already, of course).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    87. Re:A buttload of Money by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      i run a cheapo $25 350watt power supply, always on. my hard drive actually makes more noise, and i can barely hear that. and ive had the same "totally unreliable" $15 case for several years, and everything always fits perfectly. and it really doesnt need a case fan at all, but to each their own.

    88. Re:A buttload of Money by klui · · Score: 1

      You're overly optimistic. What kind of time have you spent deciding what parts you want? i.e. what kind of DVD burner should I get? Where should I get the RAM? What kind of power supply? Case? Mobo? etc? After you slap together all your parts, what do you do to ensure that all the parts are working? I can guarantee you that it will take you a lot longer than an hour. Don't forget to include the OS installation time. If you like to overclock, you would also need to do many iterations of bumping up the clock speed, reboot, run Prime95, etc.

      Using Pricewatch is interesting because you have to go to resellerratings or some other site to make sure the vendor is reputable. You'd also have to factor in many lowball entries' shipping charges so you know the price of the item is worth it. You basically have to do more work. If you like to do that and normally earn less than $10/hour, that's not a problem, but if someone earns $50/hour or more, it's not worth it.

      I've built systems before, but when I could buy a Dell 400sc (i875-based P4 2.8GHz) for less than $300, it was time to reconsider building an equivalent.

    89. Re:A buttload of Money by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1
      I Agree completely... not sure what else to say.. but you pulled the words from my mouth.

      It's a great deal...

      Guess the only thing I could add... is even if you could do something simular.. it would still be 3rd party devices, and with windows not have any idea how solid it would work. With the Mac Mini (even if you consider the upgradability a problem) you have to admit... what comes with it, was designed for it at the OS level, and everything would work rock solid. Can you do that with an equivalent Wintel box? (Even with custom upgrades)

    90. Re:A buttload of Money by m50d · · Score: 1

      Well, if you always do a "mass upgrade" like that then it may well be easier for you to get the mac mini. But I'd have thought that for most people, spending $100 each year for 5 years is a lot easier than spending $500 once every 5 years. On year 4, the person who did the incremental upgrade will have a much better PC. And what if there's only a few things that need upgrading? My PC was far from top-of-the-range when I got it about 3 years ago. The processor is still enough to play Doom 3. The 8MB 2D-only graphics card certainly isn't. I'm not a hardcore gamer by any stretch, but if I hadn't been able to separately upgrade my graphics card I'd have spent at least 5x as much as I have on my PC. Or, more likely, not have been able to play games I wanted to. Now granted with apple's reputation they're probably going to make the components more balanced, it won't be as top-heavy as what you'd get from Dell (3GHz processor + 64mb RAM anyone?), but still, everyone's needs are different and I would be willing to bet that for what *you* use it for, you will find there is at least one major bottleneck on your mac mini where upgrading that one component will give you a 20%+ performance increase.

      --
      I am trolling
    91. Re:A buttload of Money by dasunt · · Score: 1

      People who say "I can build that for less" are either not bothering to account for their time or just flat-out lying, because the plain truth of the matter is that if they could, somebody already would have, and you'd be able to just go out to a 7-11 and buy the damn thing for half off with the purchase of a medium or large fountain drink.

      Bullshit.

      When I say "I can build it for less", I am counting for my time. Building a computer isn't rocket science: the main timesink is researching components, and that's necessary for the prebuilt route as well.

      Once that is done, hop over to Newegg and order the parts up. When they arrive, spend an hour assembling them. Find a test suite and let it run overnight. Done.

      Advantages:

      • Standard parts. No bizarre power supply or case. Good if something breaks.
      • Quality parts. No "we sold this PC based on CPU frequency and memory size, have fun with the shitty hard drive, north bridge, and slow memory imported from Mongolia".

      I'm not sure about you, but I want _quality_ parts. Decent, fast, reliable drives. A modem that isn't a misguided sound card. A network card that doesn't offload its calculations to the main CPU. A motherboard with a decent chipset. A certain revision of processor. A decent sound card (dual DSP, please so I can sacrifice one to the the esound gods!). A case with the cables routed for airflow.

      Why are a lot of mass market PCs slower than a homebuild PC with the same processor speed and amount of memory? Because mass market PCs tend to skimp where most customers won't notice.

    92. Re:A buttload of Money by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Unless they are seriously crippled, anyone can put together a computer in very little time.
      You mean, "anyone with a boatload of knowledge can put..."
      Not everyone has "personally built hundreds of computers at a former job".
      Putting a computer together, and knowing which components to get in the first place, is a decidedly nontrivial task.
      If you put your own systems together, more power to you. But only a tiny minority of computer users do this. The rest spend the extra $ 100 and buy a complete system instead.

    93. Re:A buttload of Money by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      The fact that your PC's components don't last forever is a very good reason why PCs all have the capacity to be expanded. When the onboard fails, you're pretty-well screwed.

      I have had very few components fail. Most that have have been within the warrenty period. Others times, I've already upgraded long before the component failed, so it didn't matter anyway.
      Basicly, I've never been in the position of being screwed because of a component failure.

      I laugh at people who go on about how PCs are so upgradeable. If I wanted to upgrade the CPU on my current PC, I'd have to upgrade my motherboard first, and also my RAM. And my old ISA card will probably no longer be supported by any new motherboard. It would just be easier to buy a whole new system.

      Sure, some people make use of the upgradability of PCs, but most don't. So for most people--and more importantly, the target aduience of the Mac mini--The lack of upgradability doesn't matter, as the whole thing is more likely to need replacing when upgrade time comes.

    94. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3x the CPU? Even ignoring the fact that powerpc chips are much faster at the same clock speed, 3x 1.25 ghz is 3.75. I'd point how how much that costs on pricewatch, except they only have listings up to 3.6ghz. And your puny A64-2800 runs at 1.8 ghz, which would actually be worse than the mini if it didn't have a faster FSB.

      You, sir, are a complete idiot who fails it, and the only advantage your more expensive POS has over the mini is the video card.

    95. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not a gamer, why replace the graphics card so often? Do you work in data visualisation, or just like buying new hardware?

      You've upgraded your NIC? What's to upgrade? 100baseT does me just fine for anything I can think of. My bottleneck is always further down the network. Maybe you have some fancy intranet. Fibre-optic network? If it happens so quick, I'll buy a widget to plug into the USB port. It'll be fast enough.

      What the MacMini does have is known hardware. They're all the same, so no hardware or driver troubles. None. I would guess Apple have put a fair bit of effort into making the hardware they use work really, really well. You can do that, when there isn't too much diversity.

      And most PC components do last forever - well, much longer than they're useful. Unless you're some kind of upgrade addict, always dicking around with something.

      I find a computer that 'just works' quite attractive.

    96. Re:A buttload of Money by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Err, I _really_ dig the Mac Mini, and I'm _not_ one of the "Oh come on, for that price I can get a bitchin' x86 box!" because it's not about the performance specs, but I should note that my last Dell cost me $299 (after a $100 rebate), and for that price I got a real (lame) graphics card and a 2.8GHz P4-HT. Oh, and *four* DIMM slots :)

    97. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone can buy a computer, but only you can build your own.

      And yet, everybody goes on slashdot and says building your own is so easy, anyone can do it.

    98. Re:A buttload of Money by mythicflux · · Score: 1
      Athlon64 + motherboard at Fry's (on sale) ... $200
      Comes with a motherboard (try reading a bit first).

      video card ... $120 (I refuse to buy $400 video cards, sorry)
      Drop that card to $99 an you have the $20 you need for a cheapo CD-ROM.

      Of course this all assumes you have the OS already, but the point is that it is doable using the amounts provided.

    99. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about home users, not an IT shop, you fucking idiot.

      Maybe you have ghosted drive images to put on your seventeen personal computers, but normal people don't have a file to point to.

    100. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux(TM) Kernel: Making Every Day Seem Like 1970(R)

    101. Re:A buttload of Money by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *WTF? DDR 2700. It comes free in boxes of Cheerios. What are you talking about?*
      yes. it's practically free in pc world, but not when you tick it when you're ordering an apple mini.

      if you're never intending to upgrade the mac mini down the line and don't want to be disappointed with mac osx doing real work you're going to need to pay the for the memory upgrade.

      the whole point is that mac mini is NOT 'affordable' if you compare it to other COMPUTERS in general - if you just compare it to other macs, then sure, it's a 'cheap' entry. an entry that was previously catered for by second hand market. it's only cheap if your only alternatives in the world are other macs.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    102. Re:A buttload of Money by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hokay...

      First, let's set the hardware spec target:
      Mac Mini:
      CPU: 1.25ghz G4 RAM: 256MB of PC2700
      Video: ATI Radeon 9200, 32mb DDR, 4x AGP
      Drive: 40GB Ultra ATA Drive: DVD/CD-RW
      1394: 1 USB2: 2 Ethernet: 10/100
      Modem: v.92 Audio: yes

      amd64 system:
      CPU: 1.8ghz amd64 - $114
      Heatsink/Fan: Zalman 7000 - $39.99
      RAM: 256MB of PC2700 - $30.75
      Video: ATI Radeon 9200, 64mb DDR, 8x AGP - $47.50
      Drive: Maxtor 40GB 7200RPM - $45.89
      Drive: DVD/CD-RW - $30.50
      FOXCONN "755A01-6EKRS" SiS755 Chipset Motherboard for AMD Socket 754 CPU -RETAIL - $77.00
      1394: 2 USB2: 8
      Ethernet: 10/100/1000 Audio: yes
      Modem: v.92 - $11.49
      Case: Antec mid tower, 300w PS - $52.00

      Total: 449.12

      You have ~$50 to blow on better parts if you like. That $50 can go a long way. Keep in mind most of the hardware spec'd (video, drive, ethernet, audio, etc) is already superior to the mac mini.

      Also, the amd64 system is 64 bit. The mac mini isn't.

      For over $900 you can build a totally killer amd64 pc.

    103. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple! Burn your relatives a copy of a slipstreamed SP2 unattended install disc to go with their pirated WinXP serialz.

    104. Re:A buttload of Money by fedx · · Score: 2, Informative

      For what it's worth - I currently run Warcraft III, Quake III: Arena in native and Unreal Tournament 2004 on an emac 1.25 which is virtually identical to the mac mini. With a gig of RAM loaded up, the emac handles all 3 superbly. I would recommend upgrading your UT2004 demo to the latest (there were several major ATI bugs in the first release which caused those terrible screen renders you are referring to). Also, stuff as much RAM into your ibook as possible. I swear, the jump from 256 to 1 gig is like doing a CPU upgrade in UT2004

    105. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100BaseT is more than enough for intended uses of the Mini.

      I agree, 100BaseT has a useful bandwith of about 50 mbps, which is more than 5MBps. That's enough bandwidth to carry two uncompressed DVD streams side by side. And that's per segment. If you have a 100/1000 switch, your connection to your mini won't be shared by anything else.

    106. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, the Mac Mini does NOT have gigabit built-in, it has 100baseT, which is going to start feeling like a 14.4 modem in just a couple years.
      Do you have any idea of the speed of hard drives in comparison with networks? What do you think you're going to do with this amount of data throughput? Toast marshmallows on it?
    107. Re:A buttload of Money by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      laptops are usualy very quite, no many movieng parts (thou i have hear some really loud ones)

      macs always have been quite. But you can alsp get quite PCs.

      My computer is nearly dead silent, its a athlon 2500+ with 2 HDs and geforce 4. alls you hear is a faint wind noise.

      built a computer for a friend, same thing, really damn quite. If you know what your doing its easy to make a quite PC.

    108. Re:A buttload of Money by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      the reason i build my own copmuters is i get to pick each component, Good stuff instead of the crap alot of computers come with nowadays. When i build myself a server (home use) i research each part and then buy and build it. Everyone is amazed when they hear my computers, they are quite, stable, and fast. And i enjoy doing it:) plenty of reasons to roll out your own.

      But if i'm building one for a friend as a favor, I get decent parts, no expensive but still good. it takes me about 2 hours, includeing basic OS install. Putting the parts togeather taks less then 30 min. Usualy cheaper then pre built. The hardware lasts. They have no problems.

      Also computers i build are pretty dman quite like the macs. Pre built PCs are never quite

      Used to be prebuilt computers REALLY sucked. might not be true nowadays thou. times have definity changed in the last 5-10 years.

    109. Re:A buttload of Money by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      My glorified 386 is faster than your RISC "workstation", and way cheaper.

      Who told ya that I run a minix kernel? Even Tanenbaum, the Minix creator, acknowledges that Linux IS NOT A MINIX DERIVATIVE (seen at Tanenbaum's home page); even if it was, what is wrong with it? It runs great on many many kinds of hardware (including your beloved RISC "workstations").

      Deal with it, while you are running a wanna-be RISC workstation, and a wanna-be UNIX kernel, the rest of us are going to get the fastest CISC workstations, with the latest and greatest from the best developers all around the world.

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    110. Re:A buttload of Money by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      you're not getting any powerhouses for $600

      How much does a Pentium 4 cost? Ah, yeah, you have to account for industrial-strength cooling for the smallest heater in the world

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    111. Re:A buttload of Money by teridon · · Score: 1

      Good point on the hardware, but I'd say leaving out the cost of the OS and the software is a serious omission. That is, unless you are going to claim Linux and Free Software are a match for OS X and iLife?

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    112. Re:A buttload of Money by Mocenigo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      All you fan bois need to get over it. You can easily spend the same amount on a PC and get a far superior computer in terms of expandibility, speed, value, capability. Coming up with lame examples that 'prove' it isn't possible (not what this parent poster did, but many others did) just makes you look like pissy whiners who don't let reality get in your way.

      Well, this is going to be modded as redundant, but, please, remember that you get an amazing operating system (XP and Linux do not come close wrt usability, despite progress) and a lot of software bundled with it. And great software, that really increases your productivity. Coming from Linux, I used Thunderbird and its address book for some time on the mac. But then I saw the sinergy of the OS X Address Book with Mail.app and other apps (like Adium), because friends used those. It was simply astounding. You cannot come close to that on XP unless you do everything INSIDE Office, and still there's a big gap. I miss only NNTP in Mail... Note that Office does not come bundled with the under-$500 cheapo Dells.

      Of course the mac mini does not have 5 PCI slots. Of course it does not have an AGP 8x slot. Of course thereì's no room in it for two 10000 rpm 160Gb S-ATA Hard drives. Of course it does not come with 2 2.5Ghz IBM PowerPC 970fx processors. That would be a completely different machine (which in fact, except for the number of PCI slots, Apple also offers).

    113. Re:A buttload of Money by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 0, Troll
      A buttload of Money

      1. Speaking of which That link ought to prove it...
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    114. Re:A buttload of Money by beelsebob · · Score: 1
      No... Not CD-ROM, CD-RW and DVD-ROM.

      Plus of course you're also losing sight of the fact that this machine you're building is not going to be tiny, is not going to be neer silent and is not going to consume almost no power.

    115. Re:A buttload of Money by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Um, you appear to have forgotten the motherboard, sound card and operating system. And what advantage do you think having a 64 bit system gives you when you just bought a mere 256MB of RAM?

    116. Re:A buttload of Money by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is that 45% (I was going to say 95% just so I could directly contradict your statement, but 45% is more accurate) of the people out there buy cobbled together piece-of-shit computers from ghetto shops that still install win98 on them. Coincidentally, these are the same people are the least likely to understand that it's not a problem with their DSL but rather with their computer, and I take 35-55 phone calls a night from them.

      For these people, getting the minimac is ideal. No longer can they claim price is what's keeping them from getting a computer that won't screw up on them.

      And no, buying a new Dell with XP isn't the answer either... why?

      Because the other 50%, those that do buy new Dells, they have the same troubles, though not nearly to the same degree. If you have to pay $500, do you chuck the old win98 box that craps out twice a day for A) A new XP Dell that craps out twice a month or B) the Mini, that won't ever give you problems until the HD dies?

      Of either of these two categories of people, do you believe that the answer is putting together their own graybox machine?

      Off-topic: Speaking of firewire, does anyone know if the Toshiba Satellite A75-s209 can be firewire upgraded? I'm not opening it up while under warranty, but it's got a cutout for the stuff, in an area not near the mainlogic board. Was wondering if it was a seperate module..

    117. Re:A buttload of Money by finkployd · · Score: 2, Informative

      For what it's worth - I currently run Warcraft III, Quake III: Arena in native and Unreal Tournament 2004 on an emac 1.25 which is virtually identical to the mac mini. With a gig of RAM loaded up, the emac handles all 3 superbly.

      I played Warcraft III, Quake III: Arena, Halo, Diablo II, and Civ III with no problems on my 800MHz Flat Panel iMac. I think I had to tone down some of the screen effects in Halo, but otherwise everything worked suprisingly well.

      Agreed, 1GB ram is necessary. It shocks me that Apple sells machines with less than 512 preloaded. Fortunately ram is somewhat cheap, just don't buy it from Apple.

      Finkployd

    118. Re:A buttload of Money by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 1
      If I buy a new computer, I've just bought a case, motherboard, hard drive, sound card, mouse, keyboard , monitor, and a few other things that I'm probably forgetting, that I don't need.

      You are either grossly overestimating minimum wage or the amount of time it takes to get the parts and build a computer. You'd make about 50 bucks at a minimum wage job in the time it would take to build a system.

    119. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every year when a new Mac comes out we get the comments "I can build a new computer for half the money that doesn't suck nearly as bad as this new Mac".

      I thought that the Mac mini would finally shut these hotrodders up, but no.

      So in three years when Apple releases the sub $200 Mac they'll be crowing " I can build a new computer for half the money that doesn't...."

      If the time it takes to shop for parts and software and put the pieces together is counted as an investment, then the return on investment equation is getting worse each year for the hot rod builders. Do you think Apple knows this?

      Even today, Mac users understand that even if it were possible for them to build a better PC for half as much, the $250 minus time invested is not worth as much as Mac OS X, iLife, AppleWorks, Quicken, and 1 year warranty combined, and most of all "It Just Works"(TM).

    120. Re:A buttload of Money by NeoBeans · · Score: 1
      I've replaced my videocard about 3 times in 2 years. I'm not even a gamer.

      I'm not sure you're representative of the "budget computer purchaser". Most of them see their machines as disposable. Rather than upgrade the video card, they just buy a brand new system.

      If these mini macs just had even just 2 PCI slots, I'd be willing to buy one. Even if I knew I would need to put the system in a larger case to use those slots... The ability to change devices is the difference between a computer anyone can continue using for years, and a computer that becomes useless after 2 years because one minor component fails and there's no way to replace it.

      Again, is the typical buyer of a cheap PC constantly upgrading components? If the demographic for this market are people who are looking for a cheap computer because they need something that just works, I don' t think they'll avail themselves of PCI slots or any other form of internal expansion.

    121. Re:A buttload of Money by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Since when have you been allowed to speak for the heteros?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    122. Re:A buttload of Money by Fade_to_Blah · · Score: 1

      Ummm...he did include the motherboard. It also has onboard audio which in most situtations works just fine. You are correct on one point though, he did forget the operating system.

    123. Re:A buttload of Money by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      "My glorified 386 is faster than your RISC "workstation", and way cheap."

      Faster at what? For some specialised applications, the G4 just pisses all over ANY i386 chip.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    124. Re:A buttload of Money by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      If you had a girlfriend she'd really hate your ugly, noisy, box of nerd.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    125. Re:A buttload of Money by e2mtt · · Score: 1

      Not only did you forget any software costs, (OK use Linux, whatever), but you figure your time as free. Basically your $50 covers building the system, and installing linux and and anyother software. I think you have just proved our point, not yours.

    126. Re:A buttload of Money by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. I just upgraded my gaming rig for under 600.

      How many X-Boxes did you buy, exactly?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    127. Re:A buttload of Money by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      I have nothing against the Mini, in fact I think the price point is rather in favor of the machine for what you get, especially compared to a comparable mini-itx system. I'm not sure all the facets of the Mini, size, power, components, can be effectively duplicated for less even.

      However, while you speak of working extra time at a menial crap job, I'll speak of the enjoyment and experience one could get out of building a mini-itx machine that is comparable. I know, for me at least, that I enjoy fiddling with hardware, assembling a machine for personal use, and reaping the benefits of that effort. For me, it is at times how I choose to spend my free time. It doesn't matter if I could pay for the machine twice over if I'd get a crappy job instead. I don't enjoy making grease-logged food for others, and I do enjoy assembling the one off computer.

      No, people who say they can build it for less are discounting their time to "all the joy I can wring out of it per hour". Nobody's speaking of doing this en masse, just as a one off thing for themselves, parents, maybe a clueless friend.

      --
      If not now, when?
    128. Re:A buttload of Money by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      "while PCs cater to power and control"

      Yeah, Microsoft's power and control.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    129. Re:A buttload of Money by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

      OS: Windows XP Pro (No cheaping out on the crappy home version) - $135.99

      That alone brings you up to $585.11 and that's without adding in a few cheapo games, some stipped-down office that's equivalent to Appleworks, and a suite of video and audio editing software equivalent to iMovie, iDVD, GarageBand and the rest of the iLife '05 stuff...

      If we're going to compare costs here, you can't forget the software, and using your pirated XP cd doesn't count.

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    130. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MacOS X doesn't have a microkernel. The Mach project did eventually develop a heavyweight microkernel, but Darwin is decidedly not a microkernel. It's very much as monolithic as linux.

    131. Re:A buttload of Money by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First, how long will it take to assemble the Athlon system? How much is your time worth per hour?

      Secondly, the Athlon system has a 300W PSU, while the Mac uses 85W (almost the power consumption of the CPU alone in an Athlon system). This equates to around 0.6/hour more to operate the Athlon than the Mac Mini. Not much, but assuming the system is on for 10 hours a day this is over $20/year. Again, not a huge amount, but worth considering. Not to mention the fact that the Mac Mini will be much quieter as a result.

      Thirdly, you didn't include the cost of software. Perhaps you are going to run Linux/BSD/ReactOS on the system. Perhaps you can find some open source equivalents of iMovie, and friends.

      Finally, the AMD system is a lot larger in terms of physical space. I have recently got rid of all of the desktop systems I own because their noise and space requirements were too irritating. I may invest in a Mac Mini once Tiger is released, because it has none of these disadvantages.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    132. Re:A buttload of Money by bani · · Score: 1

      linux works for me, it might not for everyone else though. but why dictate what os the end user must use (xp, osx, or linux)?

      i don't pirate software. i dont even use 'doze. so that argument is empty and baseless.

    133. Re:A buttload of Money by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

      i was addressing the parent poster's question ("impossible to build a sub $500 amd64").

    134. Re:A buttload of Money by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

      i was addressing the parent post, which claimed it was impossible to build a sub $500 amd64 pc. it isn't.

    135. Re:A buttload of Money by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "And I say this as a long-time Mac lover, typing this on my iBook G4 which I love dearly, but on which Warcraft 3 is slow, UT runs in Classic (which doesn't seem to support multiple mouse buttons), Quake 3 also runs in Classic because the native port is even worse, and the UT2k4 demo doesn't even render the title screen correctly."

      I honestly don't know where you're coming from. I don't have any of these problems on my system. Quake 3 looks the same as the PC version to me. UT2004 is mind-blowing, and even RTCW is still fun. It's true that some games don't get ported.

      To me, the Mac is more game system than I need.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    136. Re:A buttload of Money by bmxbandit · · Score: 1

      About 12 times more than a Gamecube. Mind you you don't have the fun of spending half an hour of installation and configuring before actually getting it to work. Windows gamers are people who waste a fortune on a computer and then realise that playing sub-standard games is the only thing it will actually do!

    137. Re:A buttload of Money by frankie · · Score: 1
      my iBook G4 which I love dearly, but on which Warcraft 3 is slow, UT runs in Classic

      Three points of dispute:

      1. How much RAM in your iBook? Anything less than 512 isn't suitable for gaming.
      2. Your lovable iBook only has a 32MB 9200 card. Try a 64+MB 9600 or GF5xxx and you'll see different.
        And yes, this is the main thing that needs to be upgraded in MiniMac v2 (hopefully by August).
      3. UT runs in OS X, although it may take some twiddling.
    138. Re:A buttload of Money by sholden · · Score: 1

      Or just download linux.

      Or if you must have MS Windows just download XP x64

    139. Re:A buttload of Money by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      That's assuming that the size is an advantage for this crowd, when most users would rather have the slots and an accessible case.

      Don't kid yourself, the size is more of a justifcation for a crippled low-end Mac than a feature.


      And indeed, if you merely scan through the other posts, you will find a lot of people who see the small size as an advantage.

    140. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      You have ~$50 to blow on better parts if you like.
      Make that $35.
    141. Re:A buttload of Money by alienw · · Score: 1

      For well-under $500 I certainly could put together a nice fanless mini-ATX PC.

      Care to try? Make sure it is at least comparable to the G4 (i.e. Intel or AMD processor, none of that VIA crap). Also, be sure to include 256 megs of DDR RAM, a hard drive, a DVD/CD-RW drive, and a case that is roughly the same size as the Mini. I am pretty sure you won't even be able to build one for under $500, much less make it fanless or the same size as the Mac.

    142. Re:A buttload of Money by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually the lack of Firewire 800 is a deal-breaker for me. Without it, there is no way to get any kind of high-speed mass storage connected to the thing. It uses a laptop-grade (ie; slow) HD and has no gigabit for connecting to a shared RAID.

      --

      "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
    143. Re:A buttload of Money by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      Now it may take 3 hours to install an OS and apps if you're sitting there watching everything churn (Oooohh... blue bars moving across a screen...). But I (and I guess most here), will click on the Install button, and once we see blue bars start moving, go work and play on another machine while the blue bars move.

      It also depends on what apps you're installing. Installing and patching the games is what takes the longest time for me to setup a new machine...

      Nephilium
      Simony's eyes gleamed with the gleam of a man who had seen the future and found it covered with armour plating. -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)

    144. Re:A buttload of Money by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. I've been building my own machines for years, not just for the ability to select the exact parts, but also for the challenge and experience. I don't consider cost to be a motivating factor at all, in fact most of my self-built units end up costing more than the comparable Dell or whatever, simply because I insist on quality components (and sometimes buy parts retail, having little patience for shipping)

      That said, the Mac Mini is quite attractive. I've been considering building a Mini-ITX machine for server duty, but this seems to have everything I need, in the right formfactor, with low noise and heat production. My only conundrum is whether to keep OS X or put Debian on it. ;)

    145. Re:A buttload of Money by bubblewrapgrl · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong here - Macs are just not gaming machines, unfortunately.

      Sorry, but I think you're wrong here. I think Macs make fine gaming machines. I have a PowerBook G4 with a 128 MB video card and 512 MB of RAM. I play World of Warcraft and Warcraft III all the time. It looks and runs better (graphics are smoother) on my computer than on my friends' who are running similar systems.

      Granted, I could probably use a little more RAM, but who couldn't?

    146. Re:A buttload of Money by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      quake3 runs fine in OSX on my 800mhz G4 w/ RADEON 9000 AGP...

      Although, I have to agree, warcraft3 (and C&C Generals) runs like crap on my 1ghz powerbook, and I haven't run any incarnation of UT since the original back before the dev previews of OSX were even out (like 99), so I can't comment on that...

      I wouldn't really call say "macs are just not gaming machines" but rather "the mac platform doesn't have a decent amount of good games"

      anyway, I agree with your last point about more developers embracing the MacOS... It's completely feasible to have comparable performance in a mac port of a PC game.

      i just wish things were like the old days where you could attach a PC videocard to a mac and use it with little to no hacking (maybe just a bios flash). I understand the companies' arguments about justifying funding the development for drivers for alternate platforms, but sheeeit... c'mon. when a card costs 180$ for a PC and 400$ for the mac version, that's just not fair...

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    147. Re:A buttload of Money by Chas · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about someone who's putting a system together themselves, we're definitely NOT just talking about home users. Or at least not the "what's a computer?" variety of home users.

      And yes, it takes a really huge set of cojones to call someone a "fucking idiot" when you're posting AC you flaming fucktard.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    148. Re:A buttload of Money by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Lol. a "Radeon 95-something". Yeah. With that spec you might get 30 fps (if that) at 640x480 in doom 3 at medium detail. I had a 9800pro with 256MB of DDR2 and it crawled in doom3. I upgraded to a Geforce 6800 Ultra with 256MB DDR3(the machine proc is an A64-3400+) Now it runs fine (at damn near any resolution with the detail maxed out) On the other hand, the rest of my games perform about the same or in some cases (such as HL2 which is optimized for Radeons) slower than my 9800. Certain games are optimized for certain cards. Nvidia tends to lean towards fancy (NV40 and the like) pixel shading and massive textures while ATI tends to lead in raw geometry. Doom 3 Was developed on GF6 series cards and uses CG shaders (a notoriously nvidia optimized technology) You play your Doom3 on that card. Before you compare raw megaherts across completely different architechtures consider the vector processing ability of the PowerPC G4. Consider that on my mac (Powerbook 17" w/ 128MB Radeon9700 Pro) photoshop is faster than on my A64. It flat out blows my A64 out of the water when running wings3d (modeling software). Like my a64, i can compile and run all my *nix apps. If MacOS was not unix based i would have not bothered buying a mac. I am very impressed with it so far. Yes some things are slower (mainly badly ported games) but i have my Win/Lin dual boot A64 for that. Yes i aggree that Doom3 will probably run like crap on a Mini, as it will on most ATI based cards (i haven't tried the X800 series yet), but for many applications it will perform as fast, or faster than a pc.

    149. Re:A buttload of Money by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It has firewire 400 - is that not high speed enough for you?

    150. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but a sub $500 amd64 PC doesn't do you much good without an OS or any software.

    151. Re:A buttload of Money by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Quake III native is slow? In what universe?

      What settings do you have? We play Quake III a lot at work, including Team Arena, and assorted mods (Urban Terror, Alternate Fire). An iBook G4 is more than capable of this. Hell, it's even playable on the old Rage 128 in the Sawtooth machine.

      U2k4 works perfectly on my machine (admitedly a 15" PB, so better graphics card than your iBook) but the differences really just boil down to the amount of RAM. Apart from long load times for levels, UT2k4 is excellent.

      Original UT is also great in OS X, although there is a bug when drawing the grenades that come out of the RL's alternate fire mode (this seems to be the only error though).

    152. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real deal breaker for me was the motorized ice cream maker jack only supports 2 speed modes.

      Jesus Fucking Christ

    153. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got your math wrong.

      52+99+128+59+46+31+32=447

      Not only that, but you've got no OS. On top of that, your Video card is at least a generation behind the Mac Mini's chipset, taking it up to comperable (with DVI out) adds at least $15 (same source) taking your total to $472. If you don't assume it's a second system (ie: you can't burn CDs on another system to use for installation), you still need to buy an OS. Windows XP Home adds $92 for a total of $584. Suse 9.2 adds $76 for a total of $548.

      Upgrade the Mac Mini to 512MB RAM from Apple, and you hit $574, so you lost the price advantage against your setup using windows without taking into account non operating system software, and there's something to be said for the fact that the Mac Mini is only $26 more expensive than the build-install-and-configure-it-yourself system with Suse. (Of course that $26 was probably eaten up by shipping costs for your parts.)

    154. Re:A buttload of Money by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If these mini macs just had even just 2 PCI slots, I'd be willing to buy one. Even if I knew I would need to put the system in a larger case to use those slots... The ability to change devices is the difference between a computer anyone can continue using for years, and a computer that becomes useless after 2 years because one minor component fails and there's no way to replace it."

      Well, my thoughts on this were...at this price...it is pretty much a disposable computer....

      At the end of a couple years...figured I'd sell it on eBay...and so far, most any Apple I've seen on there keeps its resale value pretty well..just unload it, and get a new one...difference would only be like about $200 or so for an upgrade.

      This unit to me seems to really getting near the commodity hardware paradigm.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    155. Re:A buttload of Money by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

      Deal with it, while you are running a wanna-be RISC workstation, and a wanna-be UNIX kernel, the rest of us are going to get the fastest CISC workstations,

      You do realize that in hardware, intel does the implementation with RISC, I hope...it translates the CISC instructions to RISC, then executes the RISC ones.

      Because RISC is faster most of the time, due to pipelining and all that jazz.

    156. Re:A buttload of Money by spleck · · Score: 1

      I can order all the necessary parts for a computer in about 15 minutes, and build the entire thing in well under an hour. That includes everything, from opening the packaging, to spreading the heatsink grease, to tightening the last screw. I know this, because I personally built hundreds of computers at a former job. Unless they are seriously crippled, anyone can put together a computer in very little time.

      Hey, can you build a computer for my neighbor then?

      He'll pay you $10. ($10/hr is good for a computer assembler right? I mean ANYONE can do it unless they're seriously crippled). You'll throw in a year of tech support right?

      I had to spend an hour teaching him about popups and blockers. He couldn't understand why the popups he wanted weren't appearing. Even holding down shift, or control. Turns out he had 3 toolbars and SP2 all protecting him. I don't think he could build a computer himself... let alone in an hour.

    157. Re:A buttload of Money by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      we almost NEVER get a call about internet not working on a mac

      I don't know if anyone else has tried this, but an nmap -O ###.###.###.###/22 scan of my cable subnet indicated that only two out of the 500 or so hosts I found were actually Macs, and only one was OS X. The bulk of the hosts were Win9x, second most prevalent being WinXP/2k. My box was the only NetBSD system turned up.

      I'm not bashing Macs, but it could just be that there still aren't a lot of home users out there with them. Coming from a fellow tech support agent, I can guarantee that once you get a bunch of any system on your cable network, you will have more and more people calling in for support on them. Maybe the people who have/are getting Macs right now are the people who somewhat know what they're doing, still.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    158. Re:A buttload of Money by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      with an extra $99, you can have it for 3 years with warranty.

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    159. Re:A buttload of Money by spleck · · Score: 1

      Really? Here in the US it's easy to buy software for my hens teeth.

    160. Re:A buttload of Money by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Yes and no. Mac OS X uses the Mach microkernel with an integrated BSD server colocated in its address space and physically shoved into the same binary. It still very much has a microkernel architecture in a lot of ways, and even the I/O Kit (driver layer) was designed with MK concepts in mind, such as running many drivers in user space (printers, imaging devices, etc.).

      And even though all those pieces are integrated into the same kernel, there is still a very clear delineation between the different parts of the kernel. You can have a KEXT that depends on only the I/O Kit, only Mach, only BSD, or any combination thereof, and each choise brings a distinct set of symbols. BSD pieces and I/O Kit pieces are compartmentalized in the code as well. Thus, it is very much -not- as monolithic as Linux....

      So while it is true that Mac OS X isn't a pure microkernel architecutre, it is still based on the Mach microkernel. The xnu kernel was derived from MkLinux's OSFMK (which was essentially a pure MK except for optional colocation and the presence of a few basic BSD drivers grafted into the Mach MK), which was derived from OSF-1, IIRC, which was derived from CMU Mach version 3).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    161. Re:A buttload of Money by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      At full throttle, a 15,000 RPM Maxtor would only use a fourth of a FW400 bus, burst performance notwithstanding. Alternately, a DV stream is roughly a twelfth of the capacity of FW400.

      What are you doing again?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    162. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that in the XP world, those are all "old" games. And no, I'm not an XP user.

    163. Re:A buttload of Money by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I HAVE seen onboard video fail.

      It wasn't inadequate cooling - I've seen other i810s in worse heat situations work fine. I actually did TWO (of the same mobo) in. I THINK plugging a KHyperMedia CD burner into the secondary IDE channel started it, and then putting the resolution to anything other than 320x200, 320x240, 640x480, 800x600, or 1024x768 royally screwed it up. I'd had weird mouse problems with RH8.0 and W2K on this machine, and I've used other machines with the same chipset with those OSes no problem, so I'm going to blame the mobo, but I still have one of the two mobos in my possession that did this.

    164. Re:A buttload of Money by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Firewire 400 has about 50mb/s throughput. Firewire 800 a theoretical 100mb/s throughput, realistically it's closer to 40mb/s and 80mb/s. Are you thinking of hooking up an XServe RAID to one of these things? You'd need two modern hard drives in a RAID 0 enclosure to 'need' Firewire 800.

      It's bizarre talking about a $500 computing device alongside gigabit and RAID. The RAID setup alone costs more than the Mac mini, doesn't it?

    165. Re:A buttload of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're going to compare costs here, you can't forget the software, and using your pirated XP cd doesn't count.

      Why not just concede a zero cost MS OS to the x86 builders? The real comparison in cost is in the actual cash outlay. Might be unfair, but we may as well accept that for many x86 buyers, software piracy is a reality.

      No need to justify the cost or price Mac OS X or the Mini Mac to the disbelievers. Apple's not trying to sell to them anyways.

    166. Re:A buttload of Money by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      The Quadra 650 came out in '93. I still use mine as a scanning station for a 11x17 scanner. WTF, it works and lets me keep wasting time on Slashdot and Fark.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    167. Re:A buttload of Money by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it makes a hell of a shitty server. I imagine that'll keep the grandparents away from it in droves. Besides, how'll you'll fit it in a rack? It'll just drop down until it lands on something else.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    168. Re:A buttload of Money by v1 · · Score: 1

      UT 2004 runs in OS X. I can vouch for this as an avid UT2k4 player with a 15" powerbook. As of 10.3.7, Apple has finally straightened out their OpenGL drivers for the laptops, so I get good FPS. (35-45) Warcraft is also opengl-driven, and should be performing the same now.

      True, some games are not ported or are ported some time after the PC-versions release, but then again you could say the same thing comparing game consoles with PCs.

      One factor not often mentioned in gaming is stability. Of the group I play with, I am the only mac user. I'm also the only one that has not had to reinstall the game at least twice in the last six months. Two of the PC gamers have overheat problems, and two more have issues with their games just quitting or disconnecting from the server for no apparent reason. All of the PCs except one (the laptop) make almost as much noise as my hair dryer. (one ties it) Having seen all this first-hand, there's no way I'd consider a PC for a game system unless I had a few thousand dollars to throw away and a lot of maintenance time to throw at it. (but why bother?)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    169. Re:A buttload of Money by mythicflux · · Score: 1
      Well, some people don't care, the MacMini runs a G4 processor, Athlon64 is a current CPU technology. And while I personally like the idea of the MacMini, I don't like the speculation that the unit may NOT be able to run the next generation MacOS X due to it's less than powerful grpahics card, which is not on the list of supported cards for Tiger (well was before Apple suddenly pulled the list).

      As for the CD-ROM issue, drop that $120 video card to $35 for a cheapo Geforce 2 MX from a smaller computer store, and use the remaining $85 to pickup a DVD+/-RW.

      Not everyone has the same hardware requirements some may not care about the graphics for games, some may, point is that again, it is still possible to build that Athlon 64 system for around $500 USD.

    170. Re:A buttload of Money by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Not to interrupt your rant & I'm seriously thinking of getting a mac mini, but I believe it only has 100, not gigabit ethernet. Please, someone let me know if I'm mistaken.

    171. Re:A buttload of Money by RedBear · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point of PCI slots... You can't forsee what's going to happen in the future, making an open PCI slot necessary.

      It's one of those things you don't really appreciate until it's gone.

      If these mini macs just had even just 2 PCI slots, I'd be willing to buy one.


      A. What, exactly, do you think you would ever need to put in a PCI slot in the Mac mini? It has everything normal people (non-hardcore-gamers) need, or will need for the next several years. That includes Firewire 400 and USB 2.0 ports.

      B. How do you know the PCI slot isn't going to fall out of favor in the next couple of years, thus making your extra PCI slots worthless? Last time I checked, most video cards require AGP, and isn't there already a newer, better type of PCI slot?

      If you look at the actual cost of most upgrades over the life of the unit, it usually works out to being more expensive than just buying a new computer, unless you have all the requisite knowledge to pick out the right parts and install them yourself. And if you can do that, you aren't really part of the target market.

      Seriously, if you think you need some PCI slots or extra drives, get a PowerMac, but unless you're a gamer or other power user you simply don't need anything more than what's in that little box. The target audience for this thing doesn't need all that shit. They are tired of it, they don't want to do upgrades, they hate the huge, noisy boxes with fans that typically start growling after about 18 months. They just want a little box that's quiet and works. Apple is going to sell millions of these things to the target market.

    172. Re:A buttload of Money by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Most people I know have considerably more time on their hands than money. Or in other words, they can spend some time getting the computer they want, rather than what they can get the fastest.

    173. Re:A buttload of Money by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      It does. I was mistaken.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    174. Re:A buttload of Money by ediron2 · · Score: 1
      Actually the lack of Firewire 800 is a deal-breaker for me. Without it, there is no way to get any kind of high-speed mass storage connected to the thing. It uses a laptop-grade (ie; slow) HD and has no gigabit for connecting to a shared RAID.
      Yeah, my grandma was saying the same thing when I told her about the mac mini.</irony>

      Kee-ripes. Everyone keeps pretending like this is not an entry-level computer! Stop it. Wake up! If you're shoppin' for a graphics workstation (the most common user of gigabit-shared RAID that I'm aware of) and you can't fork out $1500, you're not doing the 'what's my time worth' math right.

      <Me>Squirms, struggling to resist a lame math vs. Decimal Dave joke/pun

    175. Re:A buttload of Money by martinX · · Score: 1

      Besides, how'll you'll fit it in a rack? It'll just drop down until it lands on something else.

      Priceless. I nearly laughed out loud in the office. That would be a bad thing for me...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    176. Re:A buttload of Money by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...I have built more than 30 machines. I have never been able to hold one to less than $500 once shipping for the parts is incorporated. Not realistically anyhow.....just built a couple shuttle boxes, but they both cost more than 500.
      Maybe I am just spendy.

      It has only become cheap enough to build a reasonable computer for sub 500 within the last couple years.

      The biggest differences :

      1. Mini is for the most part smaller than anything in the pc world other than pc-105 computers.

      2. Case is stylish.

      3. Mac OS-X is sleek for those who need idiot proof computing (my mom, my grandma, my wife's aunts and uncle, and my sister.)

      4. I won't have to spend hours fixing broken stuff on the machines of those mentioned above. Currently, every time I go to someones house I have to fix new stuff.

      5. Linux programs run right on the Mac Desktop without reboot. (don't need a dedicated or dual boot system)

      Sounds like a solution to keep me from maintaining a buttload of crappy window's boxes.

    177. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So, you claim that we will basically require Gigabit Ethernet in just few yeas?

      Yes. Backups via the network are quite common, and there is nothing else on the horizon that looks to replace it. Even with the 40GB drive in this low-end workstation I'm on, it takes hours to backup over the network...

      Yes, incrimental backups are okay, but not to many or restore will get confused, and you'll lose the whole series. RSync (assuming you are backing up to another hard drive) can reduce the bandwidth required, but it has plenty of limitations of it's own.

      Are you one of those who think that "Gigabit Ehternet makes my internet faster"?

      Always good to stick an insult in there...

      100BaseT is more than enough for intended uses of the Mini.

      I'm getting real damn sick hearing about "intended uses" and "target audience" as an excuse for the problems Macs have...

      But how many PC's have 800? How many low-end PC's have Firewire at all?

      That's the nice thing about PCI cards... Your PC doesn't have to come with certain functionality, you can just spend a few dollars and get a card if/when you need it. The sheer number doesn't matter at all, the question is, of those that need it, how many CAN'T get it?

      How many devices/apps require Firewire 800?

      Nice wording there... At what point does a speed increase become a "requirement"?

      How many people require a 56K modem? None, they could always just wait several times longer for a file to download... How many devices require USB2? None. At some point though, it's a big enough speed jump that it might as well be a requirement.

      If the Mini had those two slots, you would just find some other flaw in it.

      Speak for yourself, I'm perfectly capable of speaking on my own.

      Instead of upgrading your machine every two years, you can simply buy a new Mini every two years. End-result is more or less the same, as is the expense.

      Now that's just blatantly wrong. The expense is vastly different. If a videocard dies after a couple years, buying a new videocard for $40 is a huge jump away from buying a new Mac mini for $500.

      Even if the price was even remotely the same, the vast wastefulness of throwing away a computer that is 99% functional, just because it doesn't have a single PCI slot, is ridiculous.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    178. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1

      People really over-estimate the ammount of knowledge needed to put a system together. Anyone can put screws in, plug-in AGP/PCI devices, etc. The only difficult part is putting the CPU/Heatsink on, and that's actually gotten quite easy now.

      Knowing that screws need to be turned clockwise to tighten them, is that the boatload of knowledge you are referring to?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    179. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1
      How do you know the PCI slot isn't going to fall out of favor in the next couple of years, thus making your extra PCI slots worthless?

      Because I can still go out and buy ISA devices.

      Even if the whole world suddenly upgrades to PCI-e overnight, PCI devices will be sold for at least a decade to come.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    180. Re:A buttload of Money by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You seem to have forgotten where you are Mr. Bombshell. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    181. Re:A buttload of Money by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Bah! I plan to do real time modeling if global weather systems, fold complex proteins for my side gig in pharmagenetics, beat international chess champions, render 3d objects with billions of polygons, and email my mom. And you're telling me this thing has only firewire 400? Next you'll be telling me it uses an older cpu. I repeat, sir: Bah!

      =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    182. Re:A buttload of Money by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Let me make this simple for you with the well loved car analogy.

      If you need a dump truck, buy a dump truck. Don't buy a Volkswagon Bug.

      Conversely, if you're in the market for a VW or other small car, don't buy a dump truck.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    183. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If you need a dump truck, buy a dump truck. Don't buy a Volkswagon Bug.

      I fail to see how this analogy relates to anything at all...

      Unless a "Volkswagon Bug" has the rims welded to the axle and the hood welded shut, and I'm supposed to buy a dump truck to get a vehicle that hasn't been crippled in this way.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    184. Re:A buttload of Money by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Let's explore your version of the analogy. If a mac mini is a VW Bug, then what parts of it would correspond to the axle and hood?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    185. Re:A buttload of Money by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Yes. Backups via the network are quite common, and there is nothing else on the horizon that looks to replace it.


      And we all know home-users have some kind of SAN or server with RAID that they use for backups, therefore Mini needs Gigabit Ethernet. Or maybe not. Maybe most home-users do their backups by burning their important files on a CD. And the Mini is perfectly capable of doing just that.

      This workstation that I'm using gets backed up regurarly. Hell, it's backed up via WAN that has a speed of *drum roll*.... 2Mb/sec (and that bandwidth is shared with about 60 other people who also back up (and surf the web, and check their email) via that WAN. Oh the horror!)! And there are zero problems with it! It backs up in the background, and it never ever disrupts me or my work. So why do I (or the Mini) need Gigabit Ethernet again? you are saying that we absolutely need 1000Mb/sec network for backups, when I do just fine with 2Mb/sec?

      Even with the 40GB drive in this low-end workstation I'm on, it takes hours to backup over the network...


      Of couse, you can't do anything with the computer while it backs up. You have to stop everything and just stare at the screen. I guess I have some kind of hi-end computer that allows me to do this thing called "multitasking".

      Your PC doesn't have to come with certain functionality, you can just spend a few dollars and get a card if/when you need it.


      But that PC wouldn't be that cheap anymore, now would it?

      At what point does a speed increase become a "requirement"?


      Considering that most devices don't even come close to saturating Firewire 400, I fail to see how Firewire 800 is anywhere close of being an "requirement".

      Even if the price was even remotely the same, the vast wastefulness of throwing away a computer that is 99% functional, just because it doesn't have a single PCI slot, is ridiculous.


      Then don't throw it away! Buy an expandable Mac instead and find some other use for the Mini! Or *shock and horror* sell it to someone else!

      But seriously: If expandability is a requirement for you, then obviously the Mini is not for you.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    186. Re:A buttload of Money by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Most of the problem is knowing which components to get. Will motherboard XYZ work with processor ABC? How big a PSU do I need? And it goes on and on.
      Most ./-ers will consider this trivial, since they spend the whole day absorbing this kind of information anyway. But Joe Public without a CS/EE background will have to spend weeks before he's confident he's picked the right components.

      Once you have all this knowledge, putting the system together isn't that difficult, though the first time is rather daunting: after all, one mistake and hundreds of dollars go up in smoke.

    187. Re:A buttload of Money by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      I played ... Civ III with no problems on my 800MHz Flat Panel iMac

      Hey thanks for the comment! I ws flip flopping on whether or not to get one of these. I've been running linux exclusively for ~3 months now and am really really missing my civ 3 fix, but if I can run it on a mac that's yet another reason to get it.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    188. Re:A buttload of Money by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      A 1.25GHz G4 isn't too shabby. Or 1.42GHz.

      Think of all the iBook and PowerBook owners out there with 1GHz machines.

      Or PowerMac owners with 1.25GHz machines.

      It's cheap. It's small. It's not underpowered.

      It should do great folding complex proteins, modeling, and chess. The only drawback is the FSB, at 133MHz. As long as it's compute bound and not memory bound, the mini is pretty good.

    189. Re:A buttload of Money by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It's actually a 167 Mhz bus on the system. That's a whopping extra 34 MHZ of juicy data moving goodness.

      And you're completely correct in my case. I've got a PB 800, and a gigabit G4 tower with the CPU upgraded to 1 Ghz. So in terms of CPU power, the mini outguns my machines.

      (I also have a 7100 I keep around for playing that one game I love that I haven't gotten to run on anything non-beige, and because it has nubus slots, and I spent a huge amount of money on this one nu bus card that I'll probably never get around to using ever again.)

      I was sarcastically suggesting that I needed something in the range between a workstation and a supercomputer. I'll probably have to wait for Steve's head-in-a-jar to give that keynote.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    190. Re:A buttload of Money by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Pricewatch even has a section where you can buy a Mobo with CPU (and usually thermal pad/heatsink/fan too). So anyone can handle that.

      As for power supply, I'm not sure it's possible to get one that's too small these days (unless you've building a quad-processor box with a RAID array, etc). And thanks to the cheap Chinese knock-off brands, the highest-rated PS you can find (500W+), are only $25 or so. So whether they go low or high, they can't really shovery much.

      However, I wasn't suggesting that people build their first computer... They should have someone else do so, or buy a retail PC. After that, they can just look inside the case and see what they have, and the minimum of what they presumably need.

      I worked at a school for about 3 years, so I've come across hundreds of young people building their first computers. I've never seen them screw anything up, other than maybe not ordering a component they needed, and having to wait a week before they could finish everything.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    191. Re:A buttload of Money by bbtom · · Score: 1

      And, suprise suprise, I've got a cheap home-built PC that has Ethernet, stereo and USB built on the board. And for not much more money I could have bought a mainboard like my brothers which has Gigabit and FireWire built in. Price difference? About £15 - £20 ($30 - $40).

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    192. Re:A buttload of Money by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You completely missed the point. The point wasn't which computer has more toys, the point was that in this day and age, on the mac, and now on the PC, PCI slots are fast becoming useless. Remember 7 or 8 years ago, when having less than 5 PCI slots was stupid? That was because motherboards didn't come with good equipment on them, on board sound sucked, video sucked worse (and for the most part still does), on board NICs were hit or miss and the only ports on board were PS/2 and legacy.

      These days, you could reasonably get by with 3 PCI slots or 2 + 1 AGP. And most people who would buy a mini or a $500 computer could get by with 0-1 PCI slots.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  2. Hosting a video? by Tarcastil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope it's not hosted on a dissected mac mini. Unless it's overclocked. Then it's OK.

    1. Re:Hosting a video? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does anyone have pictures of the actual insides of a mac mini, instead of just a motherboard? I'd like to see how the parts fit in together, and how the cooling works.

    2. Re:Hosting a video? by dangrover · · Score: 0

      Or a Beowulf cluster of disected, overclocked, Mac Minis.

    3. Re:Hosting a video? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      The video is an uber-compressed mp4 weighing in at 700k. That's what? 2 or 3 flash/shockwave embed ads on typical commercial sites?

      For reference, right now, cnet.com weighs in at 235k. 1/3rd the size of the video. Slashdot probably has a better change of taking down cnet than this guy's video site.

    4. Re:Hosting a video? by wdr1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, sure, I do. Yeah, in fact, I'll sell them for $499!

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    5. Re:Hosting a video? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Martin
    6. Re:Hosting a video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freee ipod mini

      http://www.FreeMiniMacs.com/?r=14167460

    7. Re:Hosting a video? by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      I love the disclaimer at the bottom of that page:
      Keyboard, iPod mini, dock, hands, AirPort, Bluetooth and PC sold separately.
      No doubt by the same person who wrote "Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  3. This was not a dissection. by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was not ripped open. This mac mini was just one motherboard provided to the press for the purpose of looking at its motherboard. MacNews.de aren't the only site with images of that particular motherboard.

    --
    RST
    1. Re:This was not a dissection. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're absolutely right. You have to download the movie that shows it, as found on the website.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    2. Re:This was not a dissection. by koko775 · · Score: 1

      look at the mp4 (quicktime works) and repeat that. :)

    3. Re:This was not a dissection. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There IS a video, but it only pops off the cover, like skinning an animal and that's it. I plan to do a thoughrough disection and document it.

  4. Can't Wait by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    To put one of these babies in my car.

    Then put some wicked cool Red LED Lights in the front of the car, and whenever the car talks to me, the red lights act like a visualizer of sorts. Knight Rider here I come!

    1. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Knight Rider here I come!

      You're not interested in pulling chicks are you.

    2. Re:Can't Wait by tuxter · · Score: 1

      He posts on /. Pulling chicks is the least of his worries/skills.

      Wait, I post on /.

      Fuck it!

    3. Re:Can't Wait by thepoch · · Score: 1

      Actually you may be right about this. From watching a bunch of Discovery Channel shows, I can see that a lot of rich people that trick out their cars want a computer controlled multimedia setup in their cars. They showed one setting up a mini PC beside the dashboard and had to adjust the dash a few inches since it wouldn't fit well. This might solve these types of problems for car modifiers.

      Another added bonus... maybe allowing your ipod to not just play through the speakers on your car, but actually syncing music with your car. Imagine how nice that would be. Play music controlled via an LCD monitor on your car. Then take your music with you after you park. Hmm...

    4. Re:Can't Wait by martinoforum · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you be watching the road?

    5. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would think that a journalism degree would be much more impressive during any employment interview with the paper of record in a second-tier city.

    6. Re:Can't Wait by thepoch · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's why they want to control these stuff using an LCD screen. These screens can have bigger "buttons" that are color coded. So instead of fumbling with a black radio with black buttons with dim green or amber lights, you just take a quick glance, and press the color that you've already memorized is the function you're looking for. And that is of course why I said music. Anyone who watches videos on LCD displays in a car while driving is insane.

    7. Re:Can't Wait by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uh, no, what you want to do is use OS X's Spoken User Interface for hands free operation. The touch screen idea isn't bad, and maybe the best overall solution is some combination of the two.

      Also, with the appropriate hacks (perhaps Salling Clicker), you could integrate your bluetooth phone into the mix. Open Address Book, search for a name and have the computer dial out over the phone with voice commands. Incoming calls could also automatically mute the volume on iTunes.

      I dunno, that's just off the top of my head. You could also use your bluetooth phone to connect to the internet to look up directions on mapquest, but it'd probably be better to pull over for that.

      One question. If the mini Mac goes into the car stereo space, does the printer go into the glove compartment or do you just mount it on top of the dash? =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:Can't Wait by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Uh, no, Ohreally, the Mac Mini doesn't have audio in. That'll teach you to be so damn condescending all the time. Oh well, I guess I'd hypothetically need to purchase a Griffin iMic adapter for my hypothetical voice commanded automotive mac set up.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    9. Re:Can't Wait by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're not interested in pulling chicks are you.

      He's going after the soccer mom 30-somethings that used to have David Hasselhoff posters on their bedroom walls.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Can't Wait by martinoforum · · Score: 1

      You mean you actually look at your radio? Yowch. My driving instructor taught me to be able to do everything (changing gear, etc) without looking so I wouldn't crap myself and crash the first time I had to drive at night. Good advice, and I applied that to the stereo too.

      That's probably why I don't like the LCD idea - nothing tactile, so you can't feel what you're pressing without looking. I really don't like the idea of any in-car devices that require you to look at them unless they're essential stuff like fuel, temperature displays and so forth...

    11. Re:Can't Wait by thepoch · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly say that my idea is the best, it was just a reaction to using a really small computer inside a car. And with the current trend in LCD touchscreens as interface that's the only application I gave. It wasn't the perfect idea, and I'd gladly hear out alternative ideas. The other idea of voice-operated controls was nice if it would work. And no, I don't look at my radio. Other people do. That's why I read the manuals on my car, radio, etc, after I buy, this way, I don't have to look at radios, etc. to operate them. So with that... you don't like the LCD idea... what other suggestions do you have?

    12. Re:Can't Wait by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and that's the only trouble with it. Maybe they'll come out with a PVR version....

      Of course, even without voice control it'd be at least as cool as any mini-itx car PC you could hack together, and it would work well with my iBook.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Can't Wait by furrywithwings · · Score: 1

      Yum. MILF "Hey baby, come back to my place I'll show you all my Knight Rider Xvids, even the hot episode where he wears leather jeans." "omg, ok!"

    14. Re:Can't Wait by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Using the spoken interface is a great idea, but using the car stereo space isn't -- it's too tall to fit in a standard-size one.

      Now, if you had a car with an in-dash LCD screen, put the Mini under the seat, and got a bluetooth keyboard...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FYI: the Mini takes 17vdc nominally, but it only needs 17v if it's providing power to firewire devices. If you don't have any FW peripherals, the computer itself will run on 12v.

    16. Re:Can't Wait by martinoforum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to admit to being a bit old-fasioned, I'd probably crap myself if my car started talking to me or something.

      What would be a cool idea would be car-to-car wireless networking combined with this, so you could set up your own little broadcast radio station for other people stuck around you in traffic.

      But for UI, I'd probably just prefer to wire up something like my current mouse (an A4tech with two wheels and five buttons) which could basically control everything if you just disabled the mousing functionality and just used it as a tactile control. Hell, you could fit it to the gear-shift lever and be done with it, then you'd actually have an excuse for driving around with your left hand down there all the time other than trying to look cool :) As we all know, that just doesn't work...

    17. Re:Can't Wait by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      or you can use the same bluetooth wireless headset that you would be using with your phone. :)

      (don't forget that i mirrored the video)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    18. Re:Can't Wait by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Why not use one of the new PS2 models for that? They're at least as small (smaller, in fact, I think, but I'd have to check that), cheaper, allow you to use a TV instead of a monitor (cheaper again), and the controllers look more futuristic than your average mouse and keyboard, too. Not to mention that it would probably be easier to build a controller into the steering wheel of your car.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    19. Re:Can't Wait by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Because it doesn't have an OS or a Hard Drive?

    20. Re:Can't Wait by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of Linux? :) As for the hard drive, yes, you're right. I was probably thinking of the xbox there.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    21. Re:Can't Wait by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      To put one of these babies in my car.

      Then put some wicked cool Red LED Lights in the front of the car, and whenever the car talks to me, the red lights act like a visualizer of sorts. Knight Rider here I come!


      Well, here you go. Someone's already doing that! Looks like it's the dashboard of a Subaru just in case you're wondering.

    22. Re:Can't Wait by PerspexAvenger · · Score: 1

      Fuck it!

      As you say, given that you're posting on Slashdot, you're unlikely to be doing any of that. ;)

    23. Re:Can't Wait by thebudgie · · Score: 1

      Unless he's talking about his hand... :-P

    24. Re:Can't Wait by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think that you change gear a lot more than you retune the radio though, they're hardly comparable tasks.

    25. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you may be right about this. From watching a bunch of Discovery Channel shows, I can see that a lot of rich people that trick out their cars want a computer controlled multimedia setup in their cars. They showed one setting up a mini PC beside the dashboard and had to adjust the dash a few inches since it wouldn't fit well. This might solve these types of problems for car modifiers.

      Just wait for Apple to come out with the iCar next...

    26. Re:Can't Wait by Junta · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was saying they were planning on doing it, the picture was simply demonstrative (otherwise, it would be called the most piss-poor photoshop job ever.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    27. Re:Can't Wait by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Now, if you had a car with an in-dash LCD screen, put the Mini under the seat, and got a bluetooth keyboard...

      Hopefully you would be arrested for reckless driving the first time you attempted to make use of it while the vehicle was moving.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    28. Re:Can't Wait by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Any USB Audio (in) device should work.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    29. Re:Can't Wait by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      When did I say anything about using it while driving?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    30. Re:Can't Wait by martinoforum · · Score: 1

      Do you live in your car, or something? When else would you want it?

    31. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I work with a number of guys that do silly things like build PCs into their cars. We were talking about this and a number of ideas came to mind.
      1. The footprint of the Mini is less than your average car stereo. In theory you could simply replace the mini case with car stereo case. All you need is a DC-DC converter, perhaps rewire a few things for audio and you've got a headunit that is more useful than what you can buy for more or less the same price.
      2. Controlling the Mini could be a problem. Unless you use the salling clicker http://homepage.mac.com/jonassalling/Shareware/ind ex.html/ which lets you control most of the things we would care about from your bluetooth phone or Palm. With a bit of scripting, you could set it up to control your hydrolics or what ever else you have.
      3. You should be able to setup your mini to act as the hands free for your bluetooth phone. Route your calls through your stereo. Salling Clicker will ensure that your tunes pause while you're on the phone.
      4. Ideally, you'd want to find a 7" LCD with DVI but it shouldn't be hard to find a dongle to converd DVI to composite or what ever.
    32. Re:Can't Wait by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      When you're pulled off on the side of the road.

      At least, that's the only time you ought to be using the keyboard; a touchscreen or voice interface might be a different story.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    33. Re:Can't Wait by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Yes, I just mentioned the first one that came to mind. And it doesn't even have XLR in, so I couldn't use my sennheiser shotgun mic to tape car-to-car interviews while stuck in traffic. =) asif

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    34. Re:Can't Wait by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      < ninja rider > I put on my hat and knight rider robe. . .
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    35. Re:Can't Wait by aclarke · · Score: 1
      OK serious question. I've been using my Powerbook in the car for the last few months with my USB GPS. Unfortunately I can't find any decent Mac mapping/GPS software, which means I'm using the incredibly slow Virtual PC. This is the only reason why I expect to run Windows on my car computer other than Mac OS X or Linux.

      While I'm on a roll, how are people solving the problem of booting up and shutting down? For this reason, I was planning on using a laptop (I have one with a broken screen that will likely be perfect). I can have it run on battery power when the car shuts off, and automatically hibernate after an hour or so of inactivity. Of course, they also take DC naturally which is another bonus. Most people seem to be using desktop-based computers though which makes me wonder what I'm missing on this front.

    36. Re:Can't Wait by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      For Mac based GPS software check out Route 66 for mac os x.

  5. That is cool by leicaM6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would make a good brain for a robot

    1. Re:That is cool by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny
      It would make a good brain for a robot

      So would a Cray. If you made a really big robot.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    2. Re:That is cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Really big robots are the best kind, especially when they turn against their creators, as robots inevitably do.

    3. Re:That is cool by thegoofeedude · · Score: 0

      This is definitely cool. Good timing for me, I was going to get a Mac Mini, but the expensive RAM was a worry. Now it seems rather easy to get inside!

    4. Re:That is cool by Bastian · · Score: 1

      You can get much cheaper brains for your robots, if that's what you're after. If you're looking for a full-scale computer rather than an embedded board, the Cappuccino PC's are nice. There are also lots of mini-ITX boards out there.

      (I'm assuming that your robot doesn't need to be running Mac OS X.)

      But personally, I'd go for an embedded board that is built for low power consumption or an eviscerated laptop. A robot that has to spend most the day sitting in the corner with his butt plugged into a wall socket because he can't keep his batteries charged isn't a very fun robot.

    5. Re:That is cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, yeah, what robot couldn't use a 40 GB hard drive?

    6. Re:That is cool by temojen · · Score: 1
      ... or an eviscerated laptop

      What do you think a Mac Mini is? Look at the specs for a Mac Mini, then look at the specs for a 12" iBook. Then answer the question again.

      If I were building a robot using a board like this I'd probably choose the mini-itx though, as they're cheaper and available in more configurations.

    7. Re:That is cool by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would make a good brain for a robot

      I don't think hardware limitations are the reason we don't have super-intelligent robots running around. It's more of a software issue. Hey, if you can provide working AI robot software, I'll pony up for the hardware and we can split the profits 50-50. Deal? :)

      Cheers,
      IT

      --

      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

    8. Re:That is cool by idlake · · Score: 1

      There are lots of low-power embeddable boards out there based on x86, ARM, and even PPC. Cannibalizing an Apple desktop system for that purpose makes little sense: you'll pay more and get something far less suitable (more power consumption, fewer I/O options, etc.).

    9. Re:That is cool by Gorbag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are a number of reasons we don't have super intelligent robots running around. But one of them is arguably a hardware problem. Most AI algorithms are at least NP hard and many are exponential or worse. Hardware that can solve such problems in linear or even constant time would be a big step forward. Practical quantum computers, anyone?

      --
      -- I speak only for myself
  6. I don't understand....... by tuxter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't understand how the MAC-mini works. If it's so small, how does it keep the rain out?

    1. Re:I don't understand....... by sedna · · Score: 0, Redundant

      MOD UP, it's funny!

    2. Re:I don't understand....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, obscure reference

    3. Re:I don't understand....... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I don't understand how the MAC-mini works. If it's so small, how does it keep the rain out?

      What the hell are you talking about? Did Apple ever claim it was waterproof?

    4. Re:I don't understand....... by Powercntrl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand how the MAC-mini works. If it's so small, how does it keep the rain out?

      The same way you've kept out my understanding of your implied humor in your post. Security through obscurity! The water does not know the Mac Mini isn't waterproof.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    5. Re:I don't understand....... by starwed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since obviously no one gets it, in england (and probably other places) a mac is a type of waterproof raincoat.

    6. Re:I don't understand....... by KrancHammer · · Score: 1

      Since obviously no one gets it, in england (and probably other places) a mac is a type of waterproof raincoat.

      Also in the U.S., although they are known by the full name macintosh and is probably a regional thing as well. I don't hear that name much in the south.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    7. Re:I don't understand....... by turtledot · · Score: 1, Funny
      Obviously these (presumably - Americans) have never listened to the Beatles song "Penny Lane":


      "ON THE CORNER IS A BANKER WITH A MOTOR CAR
      THE LITTLE CHILDREN LAUGH AT HIM BEHIND HIS BACK
      AND THE BANKER NEVER WEARS A MAC
      IN THE POURING RAIN
      VERY STRANGE"

      http://the-beatles.lyrics-songs.com/lyrics/187/

      Heck now that part of the song makes sense to me now... after all these years too... :-)

    8. Re:I don't understand....... by A+Drake+Man · · Score: 1

      Now we need Madness back for one more song... When it rains cats and dogs, From my pocket I pick a Mini Mac!

    9. Re:I don't understand....... by neier · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else wondering what they call raincoats which -aren't- waterproof?

  7. Audio in? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there an actual audio in on the board? Cause there's no socket for it. Apparently this is because there are superior USB devices that work with GarageBand so no-one would use an audio in jack if there was one. What I wanna know is what's the best way to use this as a PVR? Are there USB tv tuners? How about USB high definition receivers?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Audio in? by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes there are, there is the ATI Wonder USB 2.0 that handles regular TV and it costs $130. There is also the Elgato EyeTV 500 which handles HDTV and costs $350. Both use the elgato eyetv software which is supposed to be very good.

      www.elgato.comw

    2. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Check out Elgato's eyeTV: http://www.elgato.com/. They have a pretty good USB2 PVR according to the reviews, but be forewarned, if you want to play back HD video, you need a DUAL G5, since there's no video acceleration for playback with 10.3. (I'm not sure if this will change with 10.4 and CoreVideo or not... Anyone else know?)

      I gotta admit, the idea of buying a Mac Mini and hooking it to my TV is mighty tempting...

    3. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few HD OTA STBS (wow that's a buncho acronyms!) have firewire out (say to a computer or firewire monitor), and I think it's the Samsung TIR 415 or somesuch that actually has it enabled. Better search avsforums if you're interested.

      There's even an OSX program that some people are using to grab the MPEG2 stream that it puts out.

      I thought about going that route, and perhaps coding up a more robust PVR type program to do the trick--ala some of the OSS projects. But I'm too poor and lazy. Sorry.

    4. Re:Audio in? by Xcott+Craver · · Score: 1
      I think the lack of a line-in jack is a pretty big deal, and a bad idea for a computer targeted to any large demographic (not just "prosumers.")

      New Mac users are going to want to at least try the audio-related features before buying a 40-dollar USB line-in capture device. And for many applications, a line-in or mic-in is sufficient.

      X

    5. Re:Audio in? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Personally I think it should ship with the leeto USB line-in device, and a leeto video capture device too, and hell, some "I love Mac" stickers for your car!

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Audio in? by Golias · · Score: 2, Informative

      I bought the EyeTV 500 from Elgato's web site directly.

      $299. No tax, free shipping.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Personally I think it should ship with the leeto USB line-in device, and a leeto video capture device too, and hell, some "I love Mac" stickers for your car!
      And a pony. They should include a pony.
    8. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "What I wanna know is what's the best way to use this as a PVR? Are there USB tv tuners? How about USB high definition receivers?"

      Its a Macintosh, which means FireWire is probably the best for video in (and its unlikely any given USB TV tuner will have Mac software support).

      FYI, USB is an interrupt based system where devices are allocated time on a first-come first-served basis, which makes it unsuited to streaming video (yes, it is possible, but not reliable, especially if USB 1.1 devices are on the same bus). FireWire OTOH allots a portion of bandwidth to each device, so if a device needs 100Mb/sec, that's what it gets at all times.

    9. Re:Audio in? by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not a big deal. I've used the audio-in jack on my Macs for about 1 hour over the last 5 years, and I'm an audio freak. Prosumers are the only ones who'll be doing any audio recording, and for them a $ 30 iMic isn't going to be a showstopper.
      As with all the "they should have included 'blah'" comments: that's just the opposite of the point of this machine. If you want the kitchen sink, buy a PowerMac G5. Hint: it costs more than $500.

    10. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I'd be totally impressed right now.

      Well, I would be if I did know you're talking out your ass.

    11. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've seen any of the PR shots of the back with all the ports you would notice that there is one headphone jack for audio out but nothing for audio in, which would have been nice.

    12. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the GP is correct. Firewire *is* better than USB for video. And he only said it was *unlikly* that a TV tuner for Macs would be USB based.

    13. Re:Audio in? by greed · · Score: 1
      ...and hell, some "I love Mac" stickers for your car!

      Don't know if you're kidding, but I've still got the "Apple logo" stickers that came with my Performa and iMac DV.

      I don't think they include stickers with the systems anymore. More cost-cutting, I guess.

    14. Re:Audio in? by dorzak · · Score: 1

      Yes, they still include logo stickers.

      They don't include a packing list though.

    15. Re:Audio in? by ohasten · · Score: 1

      My digital cable box has a record to VCR function so any shows saved can be moved into my G4, through my camcorder. I haven't purchased a TV card, or converter because of the price of a good one is right now out of reach. (Unemployed as my job was sent to Canada)

      What I would like is a straight video to firewire converter, It doesn't need to change channels. I just needs to convert the video. Basically what is built into my camcorder in a cable.

      I control what I want to record and what I whether I want it on my Mac. I then use iMovie to remove commercials and to add menus and I can write it to DVD. I've also used my G4, 1.25ghz (same as the Mac Mini) to convert all my VHS tapes to DVD.

      When I can I will get a Mac Mini, connect it to my TV and home entertainment center and use it as my music and photo server as well as DVD player. The only time I will work on it is to do maintenance.

      --
      "You can tell the pioneers by the arrows in their backs"
    16. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20040 426151111599

      Only works for digital signals, I guess, but still.

      HTH

    17. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because I mean hooking up a USB 1.1 device to the chain wouldn't do what he said, would it? Oh, wait. It would. Next time you think you know something, look up the technical details. You don't. But I guess I shouldn't expect too great an understanding of technology on Slashdot.

    18. Re:Audio in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With things like VOIP software, audio IM, and even in-game comm systems, an audio jack is more of a consumer feature than a pro one.

  8. Teeter Totter by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

    I've been teeter Tottering about getting a Mac for some time now, a bunch of my close friends have been putting pressure on me to get one (then again they also pressure me to drink)... cuz they all converted years ago. Now it seems like I might actually do it. Like I'm picking out stuff to do with it.

    I also thanks to this article am considering doing a crazy Mini-ITX style case mod, and upgrade. as I would something more than a low end starter system.

    Yaaay!
    --
    Ps, First post? maybe, not quite,

    1. Re:Teeter Totter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (then again they also pressure me to drink)...
      pssst...you forgot quotation marks around the word pressure...

      just though i'd do my civic duty and let you know...
    2. Re:Teeter Totter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now it seems like I might actually do it

      Which one, the drinking? Cause you know, $599 DOES buy a LOT of alcohol...

    3. Re:Teeter Totter by randallpowell · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      a bunch of my close friends have been putting pressure on me to get one (then again they also pressure me to drink)...

      Drinking and Macs....nuf said.

      cuz they all converted years ago. Now it seems like I might actually do it.

      And people wonder why it's called the Mac cult.

    4. Re:Teeter Totter by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like they have been slipping you some of the Apple Kool-aid.

  9. HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So does the Mac Mini use a laptop hard drive or what? It doesn't say anything about the HDD on that page nor the pages that I looked at on the day of the announcement. It would make sense, seeing how the Mac Mini is basically an iBook in a box, but it would kill performance.

    1. Re:HDD Q by gorim · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Go to the source and your questions will be answered. http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore.woa/72201/wo/Vi2BS8klyWlG2Fht09N1onFmOvJ /0.0.11.1.0.6.21.1.3.1.0.0.0.1.0

    2. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      So does the Mac Mini use a laptop hard drive or what? It doesn't say anything about the HDD on that page nor the pages that I looked at on the day of the announcement. It would make sense, seeing how the Mac Mini is basically an iBook in a box, but it would kill performance.

      I have access to the Apple service manuals. Yes, it is a 2.5" laptop drive, and no it is not an SO DIMM (just to quell the inaccurate information everyone seems so intent on repeating around the web)

    3. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit, actually it is an SODIMM.

      Look at this picture. For scale, the PCI slot is along the top, and the RAM slot is to the right hand side, running vertically. It's just behind the DVI socket I think. There is no WAY that holds a normal DIMM.

      It's an SO DIMM

    4. Re:HDD Q by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      No, its a regular DIMM slot

    5. Re:HDD Q by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 1

      That's the DIMM slot along the top. There's no PCI slot.

      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
    6. Re:HDD Q by ip_fired · · Score: 4, Informative

      It appears from the pictures that the ATA100 connector that they have in there is the small form factor found on the ibook/powerbook motherboards, so I would imagine that the hard drive is also a laptop harddrive. This is unfortunate as they aren't as fast as their larger siblings.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    7. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what that is supposed to show. I checked the Apple site of course and the technical specifications section in particular and didn't see any references to the physical size of the hard disk drive itself.

    8. Re:HDD Q by GreatDrok · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, I am sitting here using my Apple iBook G4 933Mhz and wondering why people get so wound up about the 'lack' of power in the new Mac mini. The only thing I would do is upgrade the RAM as I did with this iBook (added 512MB for £75 from crucial) which makes the machine nice and snappy. Other than that, the G4 is a great processor because it runs cool (my iBook is currently running at about 40 degrees Celsius and the fan doesn't kick in until it hits 75 so it is virtually silent. Same will be true of the Mac mini. Compare that to a typical cheap PC. Also, my iBook has the same graphics capabilities and a slower CPU than the mini but it is able to play UT2004 at 1024x768 surprisingly well, better than the Geforce4MX my PC came with.

      All things considered, the Mac mini will be a great machine to use and own. Mac OS X works smoothly even on a sub 1Ghz G4 so the mini is going to be ample. More to the point, where my XP Pro box with Athlon XP 2200+ and 512MB of RAM quite often feels slow and bogged down the iBook multitasks much better. I doubt that the slow hard drive in the Mac mini is going to be that big an issue either. Just do yourself a favour if you buy one, get the cheapest and stick some Crucial RAM in it (512MB is the sweet spot). I would get a Mac keyboard but use a standard 3 button scroll wheel mouse and put a good quality 17" LCD on there. That is going to get you a really nice Mac for budget PC money and it will run OS X, something I think is worth a great deal.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    9. Re:HDD Q by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

      Correct. The consensus seems to be that the 80GB HDD is the 4200rpm Toshiba MK8025GAS so the 40 GB will definitely be 4200rpm as well.

    10. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my iBook's (G4) HDD gets 28MB/s at hdparm, which is quite OK imho..

    11. Re:HDD Q by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that it's underpowered. It's great for what it is, an entry computer. The hard drive will just be slower than a normal desktop computer (which usually come with 5400-7200 rpm drives)

      I have had a similar experience as you, in that I am using a titanium powerbook clocked at 867 and it is plenty fast for what I do with it. It's even fast enough to do java development on, and you know how taxing that can be.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    12. Re:HDD Q by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      No, that sucks. A typical modern desktop hard drive is almost twice as fast (~45-53 MB/s). And I'm not even talking about Serial ATA, just plain ol' ATA-133.

    13. Re:HDD Q by jcr · · Score: 1

      Size and power draw (read: heat dissipation) are rather more important than maximum transfer rate when choosing a disk drive for this kind of application.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    14. Re:HDD Q by MemoryDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Standard Fujitsu Laptop HD... Basically the whole Mac mini has the same performance and speed as an iBook.

    15. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sucks for who? You have to remember, this thing isn't aimed at "power users," this is for people who want to do word processing, email, web, some digital music (would actually be an awesome digital music machine with an external FW drive), some basic photo viewing/processing, and maybe a little gaming. Laptops, including the one I'm typing this on, all have these "sucky" 4200 rpm drives, and they work fine for most everything people do. Want power? Get a G5 tower or a high end PC; obviously the mini isn't for you. Your point is pretty pointless.

    16. Re:HDD Q by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Size and power draw (read: heat dissipation) are rather more important than maximum transfer rate when choosing a disk drive for this kind of application.

      Yes, where "this kind of application" means 6.5"x6.5"x2", but I doubt anyone would have been any less happy with, say, 7.5"x7.5"x3". It's a valid point.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    17. Re:HDD Q by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem really is the slow hard drive *in combination* with the relative small amount of RAM.

      I have a friend who had a TiBook that he'd dropped a 7200RPM drive in, and later replaced with an AlBook, with its stock 4200RPM drive and 256MB. He just about went crazy from the slow down that the difference in swap speed made - with a machine that, as far as glock goes, was over a third faster than the one it was replacing. Upgrading the RAM helped, but he ended up eventually ended up breaking down and installing his 7200RPM drive in the AlBook (not an easy operation, to put it lightly).

      Really, I wouldn't mind the 2.5" drive as much if I could get some kind of confirmation that it's at least a 5400RPM drive. If not, I'll probably end up swapping the drive in it with the 40GB 5400RPM Seagate I've got in my P3 1GHz notebook right now when I pick up a mini in the next few months.... :)

    18. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard drive upgrades, I am sure, will void your warranty (unless you can and are willing to remove it without leaving any trace whenever you get any service). Beware that the 5400 rpm drive you are thinking of adding may seriously compromise the thermal environment inside the Mac mini.

    19. Re:HDD Q by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      The trouble with faster drives is they generate significant heat and noise. OK, not as bad these days as they were but the choices Apple has made are largely about getting it small and quiet. Of course, more RAM makes a huge difference to the performance of OSX as it will cache disc reads and writes better than Windows can.

      Anyway, glad we see eye to eye on the whole G4 is not slow thing. I remember people being pretty impressed with processors that were only 2Mhz so a 1.2 or 1.4Ghz G4 is still a very fast box. Clock for clock the PPC architecture is very efficient compared with x86 and more RAM makes up a great deal for any shortfalls in other parts of the system. PC lovers who bang on about FSB speeds and the likes are simply missing the point that a Mac with a G4 is quick enough to run OS X very comfortably and that is really all that matters.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    20. Re:HDD Q by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Oh, ew. 4200 rpm HDD and small RAM capacity makes for a terrible combination. But then those are the two components you can relatively easily replace. At least the HDD has got 8 megs of cache.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    21. Re:HDD Q by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That vertical running slot is likely to be the Airport Extreme slot.

      The slot running along the edge of the board is a common-or-garden 184 pin DIMM slot.

    22. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you bought a shitty PC; good job. And at 1024x768 your laptop will play UT2004 pretty poorly both in terms of framerate and loading times. Excellent work again. The Radeon 9200 is a pretty poor 3D accelerator, so the mini users should expect unplayable performance in UT2004 at that framerate, and most likely at considerably lower framerates.

    23. Re:HDD Q by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      ...my iBook is currently running at about 40 degrees Celsius and the fan doesn't kick in until it hits 75...

      104 Farenheit to 175 Farenheit seems a bit high to me. Are you sure that 40 C is accurate? and that the fans are off until 75 C?

    24. Re:HDD Q by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      40 C is 104 F but 75 C is 167 F rather than 175.

      I'm pretty sure the temperature is accurate, I had to force my machine to do two compiles at the same time to get it to start the fan. It took ages but once it hit 75 C the fan started, temperature dropped to 72 C and the fan stopped again. My iBook has been on all day and the case feels tepid to the touch. My old PIII used to cook and the fan would start at the slightest bit of work.

      Someone was telling me the other day that they have to sit with an oven glove on their lap to use their P4 laptop. That is just madness!

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    25. Re:HDD Q by wax66 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh... you non-gamers. Try running World of Warcraft on your Mac laptop for 6 hours straight. That's a spicy meatball! Then again, I'm also using Powerbooks and now the plastic insulated iBook. The 17" and the slightly older 15" G4s.

      --
      This is not the signature you are looking for...
    26. Re:HDD Q by Sarth · · Score: 1

      The reason people are wound up about the lack of power, is because they're PC users.

      We all know that a PC with these specs is pretty pathetic. They're simply not taking into account that the Mac has a 10 year USEFUL lifespan.

      --

      ... and, so began, the legend of the Five-point Atkins Exploding Heart Technique!

    27. Re:HDD Q by anothergene · · Score: 1

      So quit whining and upgrade the hard drive yourself to a 60GB 7.6k Travelstar.

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
    28. Re:HDD Q by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Encoding mpeg2 video is another easy way to turn your Mac into a fan heater.

      For particularly long encodes, we can get the G5's fans to spin up. My 15" Albook's fans hardly ever come on. Maybe with high CPU use when it's on my lap, but on a desk, even heavy use doesn't heat it up enough to start the fans (although it does make it nice and toasty to the touch).

    29. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who is crApple trying to sell these things to? GASP! PC users!

    30. Re:HDD Q by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Yes, makes sense that they're using a 2.5" laptop hard drive inside the Mac mini.

      That's why the largest capacity they offer is a mere 80 GB, rather than the 200+ GB that's now becoming common in 3.5" desktop drives.

    31. Re:HDD Q by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      If it starts out with lower specs, explain to me how that means it has a longer lifespan of usefulness. Do you mean it is most useful to buy a new one in 10 years, because there are just oh-so-many ways to upgrade a Mac? An entry level Mac, with lower specs than an entry-level x86, is useful longer than it, even though Apple and others continue to release new software with higher demands? Somehow, this does not make the least bit of sense. By the way, I'm assuming you still use your Macs from early 1995, and in 1995 were using ones from 1985. Would most Mac users do this? Why buy an iMac, eMac, whatever, now, unless you hadn't bought a computer in ten years? You lack coherent logic.

    32. Re:HDD Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, I did not realize the iBook had a 167 MHz bus. Oh, wait, it does not.

      This would make it somewhere between an iBook and a PowerBook (PowerBook gets the faster video card)

    33. Re:HDD Q by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I've got 4 Strawberry iMacs ranging 233-333MHz (much less than 10 years old) currently being useful in our company storage room.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    34. Re:HDD Q by Sarth · · Score: 1

      Thats a shame. Considering that I make use of non-iMac class PowerPCs, even that low end iMac would be a wonderful addition to a classroom somewhere.

      Donate the poor thing to a school. It'll get used, I'm sure of it.

      --

      ... and, so began, the legend of the Five-point Atkins Exploding Heart Technique!

    35. Re:HDD Q by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I've tried. My coworkers have tried. None of the schools here want them.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    36. Re:HDD Q by bennomatic · · Score: 1
      I second that!

      I use OS X on a 600 MHz G3 iBook, and it runs fine. The only time it feels sluggish is if my wife leaves MS Office applications running on her login and returns to the login screen instead of actually logging out. For some reason, those apps don't really seem to swap out nicely. But while it's not the most serious game machine, I have used it to play some pretty good games, and more impressively, I've done multi-track recording using GarageBand on it.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    37. Re:HDD Q by toddestan · · Score: 1

      They're simply not taking into account that the Mac has a 10 year USEFUL lifespan.

      I would consider any Mac that can't run some flavor of OSX to be useless. How many Macs made 1995 and prior can run OSX?

    38. Re:HDD Q by jurv!s · · Score: 1

      But they can run Linux! The old PowerMacs make great servers and the iMac's are great thin clients (or servers if you don't mind the monitor). OS X is not the end all be all that all these fanboys make out. Good hardware is good hardware. The fact that it's PPC also adds a little security through obscurity should you give it a public ip. Most exploits are calculated for x86 hardware.

      --
      sigs are for fools and trolls. no signature is *always* appropriate. you should turn them off in your preferences.
    39. Re:HDD Q by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      That's because you're talking to some school IT admin, who doesn't want the headache. Give them to a teacher. He or she will take them.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    40. Re:HDD Q by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Hard drive upgrades, I am sure, will void your warranty

      No, it's official now. An upgrade won't violate the warranty so long as you don't damage anything in the process.

      Beware that the 5400 rpm drive you are thinking of adding may seriously compromise the thermal environment inside the Mac mini.

      That is an interesting point.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    41. Re:HDD Q by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Hell, I can run Linux on my 10 year old PCs too, though you do have a point - as few to no exploits are ever going to target older Macs running Linux.

    42. Re:HDD Q by RedBear · · Score: 1

      And I have a 350MHz slot-loading iMac with 768MB of RAM on which Mac OS X (10.3+) is also fairly snappy. Hard to believe, I know. It was even fairly snappy with just 320MB of RAM, but the extra helps.

      Warning: update the firmware on early iMacs before you even stick an OS X install CD in it, or you will fry something inside and your iMac will die! But with the right firmware, it works great. You can probably get old iMacs cheap, too. It rocks for a general word processing/internet/iTunes device. Some of the later ones even had Firewire ports.

      Here's a link to the Apple support page for the G3 iMacs. Notice about fourth down on the list there is an alert about installing firmware 4.1.9 before installing OS X. Don't even boot from any OS X boot CD before you get that firmware updated. I'm serious.

  10. Read as: by Hobadee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read as MiniMac. Don't blame me! I'm a lighting guy!

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    1. Re:Read as: by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      That looks like something you'd see on the grid at the Robocop Dinner Theater.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  11. MOD PARENT DOWN. DID NOT RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article. They say they "got their hands on one incredibly quickly and in possibly the first Mac mini warranty-voiding exercise ripped it open to reveal the innards."

  12. Foreman!!! by tuxter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.mini-itx.com/news/98490587/

    On the same site..... WAAAAAAAY cooler, or hotter, depending.

    1. Re:Foreman!!! by gcantallopsr · · Score: 1

      IMHO that's disgusting, not cooler... O:-)

      --
      Try Ubuntu GNU/Linux, it's great!!!
    2. Re:Foreman!!! by anothergene · · Score: 1

      You have those glowing blue lights under your souped up Honda Civic too don't you?

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
  13. Best PVR option at the moment is EyeTV by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Informative

    Elgato systems sells a number of models of the EyeTV, they even have an HD model! I think it's the best best for PVR style capture. I believe it also comes with PVR kind of software.

    Then you just need to hook it into some kind of IR blaster...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  14. Apple warranty service by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's mentioned in the article, but it probably bears repeating here: "Apple states that as long as you do not BREAK your Mac Mini while working on the inside, it is still covered under warranty."

    Left unanswered is the obvious question: well then, if any hardware problems arise, how will Apple know I'm not to blame? Based on my experience getting Macs serviced (4 years in university), I'd say there's really not much to worry about. If you break the RAM slot, then tough luck. But if, say, the CPU dies through no fault of yours, Apple's not the sort of company to refuse to service your Mac on a technicality. There aren't a lot of assholes working for Apple customer service.

    Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

    1. Re:Apple warranty service by dr.badass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

      In my experience with PC repair, you can usually tell by how thoroughly the person who brought it in denies having opened the case, which is always in proportion to how broken it is.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    2. Re:Apple warranty service by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's mentioned in the article, but it probably bears repeating here: "Apple states that as long as you do not BREAK your Mac Mini while working on the inside, it is still covered under warranty."

      Translation: Apple has agreed to abide by the law and by FTC regulations. This is the same as your car dealer saying that your car warranty will remain in effect even if you elect to change your own oil filter, oil, air filter, etc.

      Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

      While companies put the "warranty void if this sticker is broken," such stickers would be easy to successfully challenge in court. There are some obvious exceptions, like hard drives where it is unlikely that the owner will have access to a clean room, but this is far different. Consumers have been successfully assembling, upgrading, and repairing personal computers for years. That's not to say that Apple is obliged to give warranty service if you, for example, put a higher wattage CPU in the machine and it causes a thermally-induced failure.

      All of this falls under the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. Just as the act guarantees your right to install a Fram air filter in your car without warranty repercussions, it allows you to install Crucial RAM in your Apple computer without Apple being able to deny all subsequent warranty claims.

      Just my $.02.

    3. Re:Apple warranty service by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I didn't know that. It's always nice to hear there's still laws on the books meant to protect us consumers.

      Kingston's got a page with a little more on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, including the Supreme Court's interpretation of a relevant piece of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

    4. Re:Apple warranty service by earthpig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, There is just one asshole and he works in Europe Support. it seems that apple service state side and here in europe are two different beasts.
      i bought my power book in the US but live right now in europe. I sent it in for the know problem of white spots on the display. There was some shipping damage and ES (euro support) refused to take any responsibility for it and refused fix anything stating - paraphrasing - give us $900 or we won't fix it, because the damage was not listed in the original service request. but when i got back to the states, thety fixed it no questions asked.

      I was talking to customer service in Ireland complaining about the level of service i was receiving. I had the guy on the phone tell me that he had head the words extortion and blackmail used a lot by people refering to the kind of support from ES.

      Form you own conclusion!

    5. Re:Apple warranty service by linux_maverick · · Score: 0

      Not many assholes? Perhaps not, but truly... how many does it take to push you over the edge when you're trying to get some justice for your sister whose POS snowy iBook has fried it's 2nd (was that 3rd?) logic board? And how much of a company suck up do you have to be to deny there's an issue when the 2 people beside me eare xperiencing the same problem. There... all better now.

    6. Re:Apple warranty service by Golias · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm replying to you on a G4 iBook which was given to me for free, simply because the folks at Apple decided that my old G3 700 iBook (the one with the notorious video problem) had to go in for repairs one time too many.

      I didn't ask, I simply pointed out that it came back from repair with problems. I loathed the idea of having it leave my hands for another week to go into the shop, but I just wanted it fixed properly. They decided that my situation was unacceptable, and loaded a new iBook with an Airport Extreme card (since it was replacing one with the old Airport card) and sent me on my merry way.

      They made an Apple customer for life that day.

      I decided to buy three years of AppleCare on the spot for the new replacement book. Just last week, I placed an order for a new mini to replace several functions which had previously been performed by my old Linux server, and become the centerpiece of my new media room. They've probably already made their money back for going the extra distance to keep me happy.

      Other companies could learn something from Apple's product support. Nothing breeds customer loyalty like standing behind your products.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Apple warranty service by neurocutie · · Score: 1
      All of this falls under the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. Just as the act guarantees your right to install a Fram air filter in your car without warranty repercussions, it allows you to install Crucial RAM in your Apple computer without Apple being able to deny all subsequent warranty claims.
      Sure, but the problems arise when the actual act of introducing a 3rd party product does cause damage. You can get into some pretty difficult to resolve finger pointing. You put XYZ memory into an ABC computer and it blows the power supply. ABC shouldn't have to pay for the blown power supply. XYZ claims that you inserted the memory backwards first, destroying the memory. XYZ claims no fault, no liability. Magnusson-Moss really only protects against out-of-warranty claims due to illegal "tie-ins".
    8. Re:Apple warranty service by jcr · · Score: 1

      I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

      There isn't, but if you break the seals on the disk drive, you're SOL. ;-)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Apple warranty service by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the problems arise when the actual act of introducing a 3rd party product does cause damage. You can get into some pretty difficult to resolve finger pointing. You put XYZ memory into an ABC computer and it blows the power supply. ABC shouldn't have to pay for the blown power supply. XYZ claims that you inserted the memory backwards first, destroying the memory. XYZ claims no fault, no liability.

      Companies don't want to lose in court. Most will want to be damned sure that the problem was not their fault before denying a warranty claim. XYZ corporation and ABC corporation don't want to find that you've put up www.abcsucks.com and www.xyzsucks.com web pages. Most would rather extend you warranty undeserved warranty service than risk a loss in court and bad press.

      Magnusson-Moss really only protects against out-of-warranty claims due to illegal "tie-ins".

      Like Apple saying "you didn't use Apple brand memory and you allowed a non-Apple shop to install the memory, so we are denying your warranty claim."

    10. Re:Apple warranty service by doodlelogic · · Score: 1
      You put XYZ memory into an ABC computer and it blows the power supply. ABC shouldn't have to pay for the blown power supply. XYZ claims that you inserted the memory backwards first, destroying the memory. XYZ claims no fault, no liability.
      That's why you should always buy insurance for your appliances (and car) from a third party insurer rather than paying for an extended warranty. Multi-product policies usually work out cheaper too.
    11. Re:Apple warranty service by Gid1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In my experience, Apple UK is pretty bad too. I've had hardware problems with every mac I've had recently (my bad luck, I think), and every time it's been a real chore getting Apple to fix it, even with AppleCare. Each time, I've ended up having to call up someone in Customer Relations in the US and have them intervene.

      The last time, my iBook screen went dead while it was just sitting on my desk. I was turned away from the Apple Centre in Kensington on the grounds that I'd bought the iBook at a different store (an Apple-authorised reseller). Apple's telephone support refused to even discuss the fault unless I paid an incident fee, which they assured me would be refunded if it turned out to be a warranty issue (which it did). That is NOT the way warranties are meant to work. My AppleCare-covered PM G4 workstation had a broken SuperDrive which destroyed the hardware test CD with a buzzsaw sound when Apple told me to try it. They wanted me to send them the machine for three weeks, just to replace a £30 part I could have fitted myself in less than a minute.

      Apple US support is great. Apple UK support isn't. I'm hoping the presence of the London retail store might make things easier, at least for us London residents.

      If I didn't rely so much on OS X and its pure superiority to everything else (IMHO), I'd never buy Apple hardware again.

    12. Re:Apple warranty service by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Other companies could learn something from Apple's product support. Nothing breeds customer loyalty like standing behind your products.

      On the other hand, other companies could learn something from Apple's mistakes with the G3 iBooks. I'm knocking on wood that my motherboard/video doesn't fail again since it'll be out of 3-year warranty in November and if it dies it basically goes in the trash. Time for a Powerbook anyway. Hopefully they don't have as many problems as my iBook G3 800MHz did. video lockups, backlight problem, power adapter dying, etc. It has been a nightmare of hardware problems, but the OS X is very nice. ;-)

    13. Re:Apple warranty service by atcurtis · · Score: 1
      In my experience with PC repair, you can usually tell by how thoroughly the person who brought it in denies having opened the case, which is always in proportion to how broken it is.


      In my experience with PC repair (10+ years), it is usually obvious when they have really screwed it up bad when they send in the wife and 2 screaming kids into the shop to drop off the machine for repair.

      They know that the guilt would be written all over their face if they bring it in themselves!

      --
      -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
      -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
    14. Re:Apple warranty service by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      While companies put the "warranty void if this sticker is broken," such stickers would be easy to successfully challenge in court.

      This will be cold comfort to the guy when Evil Computers refuses warranty service because he opens the case, and his only recourse is to take it to court.

      Just because it's legally mandated doesn't mean a company will actually do it. There are surely some shady PC companies that will try, and try very hard, to snow you with this kind of thing. The point of the original post is that Apple is not one of these.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    15. Re:Apple warranty service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this falls under the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. Just as the act guarantees your right to install a Fram air filter in your car without warranty repercussions, it allows you to install Crucial RAM in your Apple computer without Apple being able to deny all subsequent warranty claims.

      It is not as cut and dry as this though. If you change your RAM and have a problem at some stage in the future with this setup. You are NOT using the system Apple supplied you. You are using a system which has had an Apple supplied part removed and replaced with a non Apple supplied part. This system is not as Apple sold you and is in a condition unknown to them. They are fully entitled to request you revert the system back to the state they sold it to you. If you can't, you are very much out of luck if they are not willing to help you.

      Why should they support someone elses part?

      What's more, tell the end consumer about static safety handling precautions till the cows come home, but you will always get people who don't read the bloody warnings and mess their system up because of it. How is Apple to know that you killed a VLSI though static discharge?

    16. Re:Apple warranty service by johansalk · · Score: 1

      "There aren't a lot of assholes working for Apple customer service."

      I agree. I bought an imac for my girlfriend and when Appleworks screwed up an essay before it was due for submission, the person working for Apple called her professor at the university to let him know what happened.

      I thought that was excellent customer service.

    17. Re:Apple warranty service by laird · · Score: 1

      "Companies don't want to lose in court. Most will want to be damned sure that the problem was not their fault before denying a warranty claim."

      In my experience, the opposite is true -- many companies (short sighted ones, but there's no shortage of them) will initially attempt to deny nearly all claims. This (IMO) is because the person handling the claims has been told to minimize warranty costs to the company, so they have a strong incentive to weed out fake or weak claims. So by forcing the customer to have to do the work to prove the claim, they cut out a large percentage of warranty claims. This isn't merely academic -- the cost of providing the warranty support on a device is typically far more than the profit made selling the device (provide replacement, cover shipping, have technician examine unit, etc.). So if you have a 5% return rate, that could easily wipe out the profit on the other 95%, but if you reject most of the claims, you could make money instead of lose money. And the cost to the company of annoying a customer is low, because you make so little on each sale.

      I'm not saying that this is a _good_ thing, just that the economics for consumer electronics, where margins are very tight, provide a strong incentive to finger-point as much as possible. The best response (IMO) is to stay calm and document everything in writing; most companies see themselves not as trying to screw their customers so much as protect themselves from people who break their equipment and want the company to pay for it. So if you show that you know what you're talking about, and are polite about it, they'll do the right thing.

      Things are different in high-end markets, because the profit margin on the products is higher. This means that there's (1) money to cover higher quality customer support, and (2) more incentive to make customers happy, because future sales are more valuable.

    18. Re:Apple warranty service by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd prefer hardware that doesnt have "notorious" failure issues.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    19. Re:Apple warranty service by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Could your words be interpreted as "Everybody claiming that Apple won't fix your Mac on warranty after you opened it is a stinking liar"?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    20. Re:Apple warranty service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The G3 iBook's problem came from the video being packed too close to the motherboard. Future laptops have avoided this issue.

    21. Re:Apple warranty service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same experience. Mine was iBook G3 600Mhz. It had some screen problems. The screen had reduced brightness, perhaps 75-80% of normal. It would sometimes come back to full brightness. Either by prolonged use or by bending the screen back and forth (I suspected that it was the screen cable that was the problem). It was in for repair three times first the mb was changed, than it just sat in the repair shop for a week without them finding any problems and finally they changed the hd. The forth time I called I was just told that they had to put me over to another person because they had to give me a new machine. No hassle (I never mentioned a new machine) and I had the new iBook in a week or two. Just about a month before the 3-year AppleCare expired. Some weeks later I called to hear were to send the old iBook and said I assumed there was no guarantee on the new G4 iBook. The lady answered it was one year as normal and it could be prolonged to three year with AppleCare.

      What more could one possibly ask for. I am going to get myself one of those mini macs and use it as a nice server for my new iBook G4.

    22. Re:Apple warranty service by elhedran · · Score: 1

      What about applecare in Australia? anyone have any stories good or bad about that?

    23. Re:Apple warranty service by dmarx · · Score: 1
      Apple's not the sort of company to refuse to service your Mac on a technicality. There aren't a lot of assholes working for Apple customer service.

      Wanna bet?

      --
      "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    24. Re:Apple warranty service by King+Babar · · Score: 1
      I'm replying to you on a G4 iBook which was given to me for free, simply because the folks at Apple decided that my old G3 700 iBook (the one with the notorious video problem) had to go in for repairs one time too many.

      Oh, you just *suck*. Mine was in for this only twice, and you're telling me that if I'd been just a bit more annoying, I'd have gotten a G4 iBook instead? Grrr... Now, I can predict that if mine blows a third time, they're not going to give me the G4, so when that happens, I'll just send you email, and you'll give me mine. Okay?

      --

      Babar

    25. Re:Apple warranty service by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lol! Sorry to make you a little green.

      Here's the scoop on the unfortunate dual-USB G3 iBook:

      A design flaw was caused by the way the video was mounted on the motherboard.

      Even if you didn't buy AppleCare on your it, they extended the basic coverage on the motherboard for that particular model from one year to three, just because of this problem.

      If you sent yours in sometime in the last year, odds are that they put in a motherboard which added a small spacer between the video card and the board, which is supposed to put a stop to the video problems. In my case, it just so happened that the tech who fixed it also re-assembled it incorrectly, and it came back damaged as a result.

      Since I had gone back and forth with them a couple of times before the design flaw was discovered, and now they were not able to resolve the problem on the first attempt after the fix was known, they decided this time around that enough was enough, and gave me a new replacement.

      I didn't insist on it or pound my shoe on the table or anything, I just persisted in my expectation that they would resolve the matter somehow.

      If yours was fixed properly last time you sent it in (with the newly-modified mobo) the odds are against you having any further problems with it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    26. Re:Apple warranty service by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      You are using a system which has had an Apple supplied part removed and replaced with a non Apple supplied part. This system is not as Apple sold you and is in a condition unknown to them. They are fully entitled to request you revert the system back to the state they sold it to you. If you can't, you are very much out of luck if they are not willing to help you.

      That's absurd and untrue. That's like a VW dealer saying "I'm sorry, but you will have to remove the Goodyear tires and put the dealer-supplied BF Goodrich tires back on. You will have to remove the Purolator air filter and put the VW air filter back. You need to remove that NAPA exhaust and put a genuine VW exhaust back in place. You have aftermarket brake pads, so you will need to put VW brake pads on. You need to take out the Exide battery and put a genuine VW-supplied battery in. Only then will we do warranty work to determine why your car is making that squeak you complained about."

      Why should they support someone elses part?

      They don't have to. They have to support their system. If you bring the system in and they prove that the problem is the aftermarket RAM that you installed, then they have every right to bill you for their time and to hold your system until you have paid the bill.

      What's more, tell the end consumer about static safety handling precautions till the cows come home, but you will always get people who don't read the bloody warnings and mess their system up because of it. How is Apple to know that you killed a VLSI though static discharge?

      Apple can't know -- and that's the price of doing business where there are laws to protect consumers. How does your car dealer know whether you destroyed your engine by running too little oil for ten thousand miles? How do they know whether you messed up your electrical system when you originally miswired an aftermarket stereo? They don't, so we revert to a basic principle of law: Where there is uncertainty, the cost is borne by the party with the most means.

  15. PC/104 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're going on about size... why don't you go for PC/104 format? 96x96mm...

    http://www.pc104.org/

    1. Re:PC/104 by cei · · Score: 1

      Indeed, a PC/104 format Mac mobo would be a GoodThing(TM). I've only wanted one for, oh, 6 years now? Still don't see it coming...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:PC/104 by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Because an optical drive won't fit in 96x96 mm.

    3. Re:PC/104 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are out, whack "pc/104 board" in to google.... you will notice that most companies want you to ring to get a price. i.e. they are not cheep.

      PC/104 is used for embeded systems, many are 386-p1 era and are either fanless or silent.

      They are not speed deamons, but there are some slightly larger boards out that aren't that slow either (utilising the Pentium-M CPU)

      The other thing is most PC/104 boards will require you make some connectors up to connect it to your standard devices. They typically have USB, Serial, ethernet, etc. But due to the small size they tend to just have headers with no connectors.

      Either way they exist and are used.... they just aren't cheep and avaliable in the specifications that the average home user would want.

  16. im surprised by goodbadorugly · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is awesome! Think of the insane value you could get out of upgrading the ram and hard drive yourself! Cheap/powerful editing station here I come!

    1. Re:im surprised by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

      but what can it be upgraded to?

    2. Re:im surprised by bstadil · · Score: 1

      You can buy a 60G 7200 Hitachi drive for around $150 at newegg and upgrade the ram to 1Gig for around $100. You can then Ebay the 4200 40g drive and the 256meg stick for maybe $100. So delta cost would be $150 or so. The Hitachi laptop drive is as fast as a normal desktop drive. You will end up having a killer system for $650 or so.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    3. Re:im surprised by Golias · · Score: 1

      Kindly provide the link to where I can get a 1GB stick of quality PC2700 DDR 333 (or better) memory for $100.

      Seriously. I'm not just "calling bullshit" here. If you know of a good source, I'm all ears. Everyplace I've checked wants about $250.

      Scanning Pricewatch didn't do much better. Their "1 GB" section is crammed with el-cheapo, sub-spec memory which only works with certain proprietary motherboards, or "1 GB Kit" offerings which are really two 512 sticks bundled into a plastic retail case. By the time you sift through the cruft to something that will actually work as advertised, you are back to well over $200 again.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:im surprised by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You can up the RAM to one gigabyte, and I think you can replace the 4200 RPM drive with any notebook size drive (2.5", 9.5mm). If I was going to do more than home movies or student projects, I'd definitely want a faster HD.

      There are 60 GB 7200 RPM drives, but the fastest rotation of which I am aware on a 80 GB drive is 5400. Most drives offer 8 MB cache, but some have 16 MB.

      Check this page for an idea of what's out there. (note: I plug OWC because I'm a satisfied customer, and they do a lot to support the mac community)

      Of course, you'll probably want to also use Firewire drives to capture your media, if you're serious about this being an "editing station", as mentioned in the GP.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:im surprised by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      people always seem to under estimate the cost of the upgades,
      usually pricing off the lowest point which is for hardward
      that they really dont want or would be dreadful to use. How
      many people have tried to go bottom basement in memory only
      to waste hours upon hours on system problems before
      ultimately going through the headache of a return? And
      shipping and tax are not always free.

      Likewise people always overestimate what they will get for
      used items, cars and pc parts in particular. Afterall, if
      you dont want them because they are outdated, why would
      anybody else be willing to pay up?

      IMHO the mac mini is a poor deal. By the time you add
      memory, upgrade the hd, add a new monitor, kb, and mouse
      you could have had a much faster system based on inhell.
      As an ibook owner I just don't think OS X is that great
      to negate the substantial performance you will be giving up.

      Apple should have either a) included a monitor or b) upped
      the specs and charged $50 more than a low end Dell. If
      the whole idea is to get new people hooked on your products
      so they will eventually upgrade to high margin hardware or
      software then give up the crap 5-7% margin, take a small
      loss on each and chock it up to advertising expense. If
      you are right then in the not very long run you will be
      rolling in the dough on your high end stuff. If you are
      wrong, no major damage (at least to the bottom line).

    6. Re:im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the fastest rotation of which I am aware on a 80 GB drive is 5400
      You sound very informed, I trust every word you say...
    7. Re:im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the whole idea is to get new people hooked on your products so they will eventually upgrade to high margin hardware or software then give up the crap 5-7% margin take a small loss on each and chock it up to advertising expense.

      That's not the whole idea.

      The whole idea is to make money selling computers.

      The 90s are over, and so is the dot-com boom. The days when people thought "lose shitloads of money now, because it just might pay off in the long run" is a sound business strategy are long gone.

      At $500 for a very compact, headless eMac, Apple is going to sell these things by the plane-load. The could take your suggestion and lose $50 per computer sold, and maybe sell a few dozen more, or they could do exactly what they are doing and make millions of dollars hand-over-fist.

      Being able to see this is why Steve Jobs is the CEO of two vastly rich companies, and you are just a guy with a web site for ranting about what other people do with their money.

    8. Re:im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple included a good LCD monitor, the price would have been higher than the eMac.

      If they had included a cheap CRT, people like would complain that they are being "forced" to buy a shitty monitor with it.

      They are selling a tiny, quiet, working computer which runs today's best desktop OS (as well as the new OS X coming this summer) for $500. For who want:

      - A *nix box which also runs office and auto-updates weekly
      - A small and whisper-quiet media-room computer
      - A headless web/e-mail server
      - A second system to share a KVM with a Win PC
      - A computer to "pimp their ride" with
      - A cheap and secure replacement for Mom's HP Turdware
      - A luggable system for half the price of an iBook
      - Somebody willing to spend $500 to try out OS X

      the mini is a terrific deal.

      For most other people, it's probably not the best solution. Apple is betting that there are enough people in those groups that they will sell a hell of a lot of these things. If the early pre-orders are any indication, it would seem that they are correct.

    9. Re:im surprised by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      You are implying that Apple intends on becoming the walmart
      of low end computing. They are making dick for margin on
      these things and tying up productive capital. If they
      do not believe this will lead to future sales of high margin
      hardware and software then this is a waste of time and money.

      If making order 5% on their large cash horde is the best
      Jobs expects to do with this minimac then shareholders
      should be suing his ass for a large return of capital.

    10. Re:im surprised by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      I dont discount your points on who might find it useful,
      but I do question how many there are in the long run. The
      mass market, except for replacing 'moms turdware' aren't
      going to be do many of those things, if any.

      Let me ask you this - if Dell took their current low end
      PC (dimension 3k, $499 w/mon) and dropped it in a small
      form factor package, what would happen to the mini mac
      sales? Other than OS X its a much better performing
      machine for that price point. Of course it would be an
      ugly little black box.. hey it could double time as a
      flight recorder!

      As for the cost vs the emac, I think Apple could easily
      add a 15" screen for $100 given the volume discounts they
      command, still leaving it under an emac. And as the eMac
      is a differnt kind of product I'm not sure how much sales
      one would take from the other. Seems to me you'd be more
      likely to spring for an iMac than an eMac as you go up
      the price curve.

    11. Re:im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really think Apple's margins are thin when they stuff an eMac motherboard into a tiny box with an iBook HD and sell it for $500, you really have no clue. There's no way this thing costs them more than $300 to put in your hands, and that's a margin of 40% on a system they are going to sell a ton of.

      You're just mad that they didn't take Cringely's asinine suggestion of losing $50 on every box to sell them for $250.

    12. Re:im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I do question how many there are in the long run.

      Well, I'm sure you know better than Apple's market research department, who's probably just taking a wild guess at who would want a box like this. You've clearly been studying the potential of such a system for much, much longer than they have.

      Let me ask you this - if Dell took their current low end
      PC (dimension 3k, $499 w/mon) and dropped it in a small
      form factor package, what would happen to the mini mac
      sales?


      You mean after several houses burned down?

      The mini is made possible by the fact that the G4 is 1) A very low-wattage chip, and 2) A very inexpensive chip.

      It allows you to have a system which can run modern software while costing very little, using very little power, radiating very little heat, and requiring very little cooling.

      The Dell Dimension is a terrific deal for somebody looking for a low-end PC and lacks the skills to build it themselves, but the Intel Celeron is a high heat, high power-consumption CPU, and the Dimension motherboard is a cheap vanilla ATX mobo. Putting it in a small box would require the following:

      A mini-ATX motherboard (nearly double the cost of ATX).
      An extremely powerful case fan.
      A down-clocking of the CPU.
      An external power source which would be as big as the case itself.

      The result would be a system which is bigger, louder, and more expensive than a Mac mini. I don't think it will impact sales very much.

      What you will see, if the mini sells as well as Apple hopes, is a few clever PC companies building around the Centrino system about a year down the road to make a Windows "mini killer" system. They will probably do about as well as the eMachines iMac copies did back in the 90s.

  17. That's all well and good by tuxter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    But does it run Linux? I for one welcome our new mini MAC overlords. Getting boring yet?

    1. Re:That's all well and good by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Yes it does.

  18. mirror by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  19. Smash??! by Chordonblue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I guess Smash's method of opening the case or should I RTFA?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Smash??! by lxs · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't have to RTFA but at least WTFV.

    2. Re:Smash??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can I guess Smash's method of opening the case or should I RTFA?

      There's a better approach written up by a guy who calls himself "SlideNYoink".

    3. Re:Smash??! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So, the $500 iMac... NO, not for you - your parents! Imagine XMAS dinner without having to run AdAware first...

      I guess this must be pretty common. First thing I did on Christmas was clean up my mom's computer of viruses and spyware. She runs Spybot Search and Destroy every day but can't understand the concept of having to update the signatures. I wish it had an automatic update like AVG does for viruses. I'd buy her one of these Mac Minis in a heartbeat except the thing she uses 99% of the time isn't supported: Yahoo Messenger Voice Chat. To her that is the killer application. I could completely get rid of her Windows box if Macs supported Yahoo Messenger Voice Chat. Sounds silly doesn't it? She could use iChat, but all her friends use Yahoo Messenger so she refuses to switch.

    4. Re:Smash??! by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Don't be brainwashed, it's not that Mac's dont support yahoo, it's that Yahoo doesnt support Mac's :P

      I know, I'm a nitpicker :)

    5. Re:Smash??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but all her friends use Yahoo Messenger so she refuses to switch.

      Then refuse to continue to be her on-call support guy.

  20. Need a Dual G% with thier software... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Supposedly the Elgato software has no kind of hardware acceleration at all, which really reduces the ability to playback stuff on low-end computers.

    But it does output standard quicktime files that you can play back with Apple's player.

    I read a report from someone with similar thoughts, he recorded an SDTV stream (I think it was SDTV, may have been HDTV) and tried playing it back on a 1.25GHz powermac. He first tried streaming from a mounted server (which was choppy) and then from the local HD - in the last case it was still somewhat choppy.

    Unfortunatley I do not know how much RAM he had. It says to me though that if you want any chance of playing back HDTV video on one of these things the faster model (1.42GHz) would be the one to get... but that you might want to wait until reports are is as to performance. Of course if you do not already have one on order you are going to be waiting anyway at this point!

    It would probably be fine for standard TV.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by TheKidWho · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the software has no Hardware Acceleration atm, but OS X.4 is supposed to open up the hardware mpeg2 decoding via coreimage which would mean that HDTV would play perfectly fine on the 1.25ghz mini.

    2. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dream on.

    3. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      I just laughed so hard, milk came out my nose. It wouldn't be such a big deal, but I'm drinking gin.

      I'm starting to come to that sort of cusp, though. You know the one I mean? The one where people who log in to Internet message boards and write things of the form "blah blah CoreImage blah blah" -- when none of the "blah" is in any way or form related in the slightest bit to what CoreImage is or does -- go from being hilarious to mildly amusing to annoying to fucking pissing me off.

      I'm approaching that point pretty darned quickly right now.

    4. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      misuse of the word so what, either way apple is opening up some API's AFAIK with X.4

    5. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      you know the X stands for 10 right? What you want me to say Windows XP eXPerience too? Or Kernel 2.6 version 2.6.4mk1

    6. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      Is he wrong though? According to this page coreimage, to come with Tiger:

      "allows developers to easily leverage these programmable GPUs for blistering-fast image processing that can eliminate rendering time delays. Effects and transitions can be expressed with a few lines of code. Core Image handles the rest, optimizing the path to the GPU. The result is real-time, interactive responsiveness as you select and apply filters."

      and:

      Not Just for Still Images - Core Video, joining Core Image in Mac OS X Tiger, delivers a modern foundation for video services, providing a bridge between QuickTime and the GPU for hardware-accelerated video processing. This highly optimized pipeline for video presentation increases performance and reduces CPU load, freeing up resources for other operations.

      Sems like this could be important for those planning on using the mini as a PVR, provided you can get or write software that takes advantage of it...Am I misunderstanding something?

    7. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4 X.4

      blah blah blah, lameness filter, why are you looking here? the joke's in your pants?

    8. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I guess it's about that time. We're coming up on another release of Mac OS X, so it's time to blow the dust off the old "here's the difference between the name and the version number" lecture.

      Frankly, after the sheer number of recitations this particular lesson got back in the roll-up to Panther in 2003, I'm kind of amazed that there's anybody left who doesn't understand this oh-so-simple concept. But apparently there's always another idiot out there, so here we go again.

      The name of the software is "Mac OS X." That's its name. It's pronounced "Mac OS Ten," because we all learned back in elementary school that the Romans used letters instead of numbers. Remember how they made us do arithmetic, how we all learned that L + L = C and M + M = MM and all that? You thought that was just useless make-work, but no! It was, in fact, vitally important for your future understanding of product names. Well the future is now, friends. Buckle up and enjoy the ride.

      In addition to a name, the software has a version number. That version number, as of tonight, is 10.3.7. Every time Apple releases another version of the software, the version number changes. Sometimes the changes are small, from 10.3.6 to 10.3.7. Sometimes they're big, like from 10.2 to 10.3.

      So there are two parts, okay? There's the name -- Mac OS X --and the version number. Two separate things.

      So when you wrote, "X.4," you were demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between a name and a number. You were, in short, being an idiot.

      Now, before you get all whiney and complain that my harsh words have made your vagina hurt, let me reassure you: I empathize, I really do. Apple is the one to blame here. It's their fault for creating such a skull-twistingly confusing product with a number in its name, and a Roman numeral at that. What, are we all speaking Latin again? Are we all sitting around going "Quo vadimus?" at each other? Just who the hell do Apple think they are, making things all hard like that? Arrogant little pricks.

      However, in Apple's defense ...there are like six point two billion people on this planet. You're the only one left who doesn't get this.

      So, just in the future, you might want to think about extracting your head from your rectum and getting with the program, huh, chief?

      There's a good boy.

    9. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Oh what a delicious flaming. So around the year 2012 when Apple finally decides that, fuck it, 10.37.11 is a stupid version number and they've broken so much backwards compatibility anyways, let's change the version number to 11.1.1 and be done with it, are your fuckin' head gunna outright explode when they first wanker suggests that the product name should now be Mac OS XI? Are you going to get in your BMW, drive to Steve Jobs' house and bludgen him to death with your shoe when he announces that shit, that's not a bad idea? (Not that anyone needs an excuse to bludgen Jobs to death). Just curious.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Leo, you kill me sometimes. Picturing your fist coming out of The Kid's monitor and smacking him almost had me spitting gin out of my nose, and I don't even drink.

      But seriously, once you get the keyboard mopped up, could you tell us which, if any, of the cores might assist in hardware acceleration of video playback? Were you spitting because the graphics chipset/vram won't support coreimage in the first point, making it moot?

      Personally, in my limited knowledge, I think it's the slow as molasses hard drive in the mini that will cause problems with HD playback.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    11. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      So let's be clear - there have been 10 major releases of OS X, right? I mean, that's why we are on version 10.3.7, yes?

    12. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by andreMA · · Score: 1
      let's change the version number to 11.1.1 and be done with it, [...] suggests that the product name should now be Mac OS XI
      No, 11.1.1 would be OS F - they'll switch from Roman to hexadecimal.
    13. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      11 in hex is B, but nice try.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    14. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mini's video card is (probably) too slow for CoreImage. I say "probably" because the spec isn't finalized, but the last time Apple talked about it, they said you'd need 64MB of video RAM before you can use your GPU for CoreImage.

      At any rate, it seems a little presumptuous to buy a mini and the HD version of eyeTV on the general assumption that the playback requirement will someday drop from dual G5 to single mid-range G4.

    15. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT completely, but I saw the 'Quo vadimus' bit and wondered if I would be completely off thinking you might be a Sports Night fan. Then I saw your user name, and all doubt vanished.

      Anyway AC'ing is fun, right? I can post nonsense like this! The colonel is breakdancing!

    16. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Apple themselves, on their homepage www.apple.com, uses the terminoligy "OS X 10.4" or sometimes OS X Tiger V10.4" for the new version.

      OS X 10.3 is how they address the current version, Panther.

      Whether the X and the 10 are synonymous doesn't matter. Who knows, they might use OS XI and 11.x with the new OS. but I doubt it.

    17. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Joelio · · Score: 1

      Caudex!

    18. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      11 in hex is B, but nice try.


      Ah, yes, but the number is 11.1.1, which is F.

    19. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Funny
      11 in hex is B, but nice try.

      Obviously you slept through the lesson in 4th grade where they taught Roman Hexadecimal Numerals.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    20. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      Brilliant! Some day I need to hear your explaination for why Java 2 Standard Edition 5.0 programs are developed in the JDK 1.5.

    21. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse. Let's take a look at Microsoft's somewhat similar product:

      Windows NT 3.5 (the initial version of this OS)
      Windows NT 4
      Windows 2000
      Windows XP
      Windows 2003

      Not to mention the fact that they kept "improving" and selling the older, inferior version of the OS with names like Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME (wtf?) while selling NT (AKA 2000).

    22. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by andreMA · · Score: 1

      I was omiting the radix points and taking it as 1111

    23. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was using the X because he was being clever, dumbass.

    24. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      So around the year 2012 when Apple finally decides that, fuck it, 10.37.11 is a stupid version number and they've broken so much backwards compatibility anyways, let's change the version number to 11.1.1 and be done with it, are your fuckin' head gunna outright explode when they first wanker suggests that the product name should now be Mac OS XI?

      Great idea! Instead of calling it "Mac Oh-Sex", it'll be "Mac: Oh, Sexy"!

      -T

    25. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MacOS X", as a software name, stands for "Macintosh OpenStep eXtended".

    26. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      HD is only 19 Mbps. You don't need hardly any disk bandwidth at all to play back HD.

    27. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by dago · · Score: 1

      Well, first, Windows XP is 5.1.2160 (for SP2) ...

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    28. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree, and I use it that way myself, but I don' think someone should be flamed just for deciding to call it X.3 especially since the 10. is currently logically redundant.

    29. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Ah, but OS X is full of illogical things, like the slow motion modifier key (shift) for minimising and expose.

      Very cool, but ultimately redundant.

    30. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put my money on "Mac OS 11". And yeah, it will be pronounced mac-oh-ess-three.

    31. Re:Need a Dual G% with thier software... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I can field this one. It's because there's an underground pool at Sun full of retard-juice, and the entire goddamn marketing team lives in it.

  21. Didn't take long by Arghdee · · Score: 1

    I didn't think it would take long for someone to get instructions etc up, however I didn't think it would be this quick. The more these things get mentioned, the more I want one.

  22. That little WiFi board connector by Mercano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is the slot for the WiFi\Bluetooth card any sort of standard connector? Apple carges $75 for 802.11* ($125 for 802 and Bluetooth), which seems sorta pricy, unless, of course, you need to get an Apple specifc part, at which point it is just a ripoff.

    Yeah, you probably could just hook up a USB 802 adapter, but then you loose some "look how small it is" points.

    --
    #include <signature.h>
    1. Re:That little WiFi board connector by tremaali · · Score: 1

      I bet they use their Airport Extreme-slot and this is proprietary afaik

    2. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Tanlis · · Score: 1

      No, the slot is for the memory DIMM.

      The WiFi is a normal Apple Wireless card that plugs into a board that rests on top of the motherboard I believe.

      Probably not something you'd be able to do on your own unlike the memory and hard drive.

    3. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cheap-ass motherfuckers like your own precious self have yet another thing to bitch and moan about.
      Cheap-ass motherfuckers don't buy Mac, and they use ethernet anyway. Wireless is still more expensive than wired...
    4. Re:That little WiFi board connector by diamondsw · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Bluetooth module I'm unsure of, but the Airport Extreme is a mini-PCI slot, so it is a standard, although a rarely seen one. Apple sells Airport Extreme cards in their store, but I doubt you'll find a third-party one; certainly not one that will work with Apple's drivers.

      This is one of those areas where it makes sense to just go ahead and buy it up front, deal with the financial squeeze for a short while, and reap the benefits for however many years you have it.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    5. Re:That little WiFi board connector by cosmo7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe. I just put a Belkin 802.11g PCI card in my power mac (the half-ton shaving mirror one) and it works fine as an Airport card, no drivers to install or anything.

      Mind you, Belkin's rebate system is a total fraud. Absolute total broad daylight fraud. Go ahead you assholes, sue me. I dare you. Sue me right now. Fraudsters.

    6. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I had to make you a friend after that one.

      I also imagine I'd be one of the mindless koolaid drinking zombies that would try to join him in his secret mountain hide away. Although Jobs seems more like the private island type. Sort of like Dr. No, but with a top notch industrial design team.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Also, I seem to remember something about the mini not having the antenae built into the case unless you've chosen the BTO option.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:That little WiFi board connector by killbill! · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The Airport Extreme card is a regular Airport Extreme card, but you ALSO need an adapter - which is not available separately for the time being.

      (From http://www.macnews.de/news/57984 (German))

    9. Re:That little WiFi board connector by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Informative

      Any wireless card based on the broadcom chipset will appear to the Mac as an Apple-branded Airport/Airport Extreme card, unless it's something really funky like a proprietary PC wireless card from HP or something.

    10. Re:That little WiFi board connector by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Probably not something you'd be able to do on your own unlike the memory and hard drive.

      I don't understand that part. Why not just make a panel on the bottom that exposes the RAM and wireless slot like they have on iBooks under the keyboard? Also the hard drive should be on a slide-out tray like Dell notebooks use. You shouldn't have to disassemble your friggin computer to upgrade the RAM, hard drive or wireless card IMHO.

    11. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      is a mini-PCI slot, so it is a standard, although a rarely seen one.

      Mostly because few people, even hardware tech sites, ever bother disassembling or even taking a panel off laptops.

      I think every Centrino has a miniPCI slot. My pre-Centrino laptop has one for 10/100 ethernet + modem.

      I think the driver issue is a valid one, but I've heard of a project where Mac users successfully ported a BSD wireless card driver.

    12. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I suggest you look up the prices of miniPCI wireless cards. $75 isn't that out of line.

    13. Re:That little WiFi board connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't use mini-PCI for their airport connectors. The actually card has a different number of pins than standard. This means that those of us who'd like to replace the wireless card for something that has released open drivers are stuck.

    14. Re:That little WiFi board connector by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1
      Wireless is still more expensive than wired...
      I have to differ. Recently I set up a network for some neighbors -- two computers in a single room, with the router to handle a DSL modem. I went with 802.11b, and it only cost $25 for the whole thing. ($15 router, $5 each card.) For a wired network, the cards would've been no cheaper, plus I'd have the cable cost.

      Of course this all depends on $85 in rebates.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  23. Vapourware by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Nevertheless, I do wonder if theres some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know youve opened the case.The stickers must be vapourware just like the Phantom because I've never seen one.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Vapourware by fmaxwell · · Score: 0

      The stickers must be vapourware just like the Phantom because I've never seen one.

      Then perhaps you should look more closely.

    2. Re:Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quite dumb.

      He's talking about stickers on/inside of the case of the Mac Mini to let Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider that you have opened it and have thus voided the warranty. Not the warranty stickers on a harddrive, which has NO user serviceable parts, and shouldn't be opened.

    3. Re:Vapourware by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Well, thats not a mac to begin with, its just a hard drive. And secondly, those stickers cover they dust holes. There's a brilliant reason you shouldn't open them up- Dust gets in! Hard drives today are sealed from the atmosphere (pretty much) though, and if the temperature inside due to heat and friction rises too much, the air in the hard drive expands and pfft- it will blow out through the dust hole.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re:Vapourware by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nevertheless, I do wonder if there's some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know you've opened the case.

      Yeah, 'cause the apple repair technicians are just going to open the case and inspect the sticker and, oh, wait...

      And no, stickers on the outside of the case arent an option. Nothing can uglify that beautiful case.

      Had a gateway once with a void warranty sticker on the case. Before I knew anything about hardware and how to build my own computers of course. How did I learn to build computers? Went to my first LAN party with said Gateway, cracked the case and installed a NIC. I was support after that. :)

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    5. Re:Vapourware by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      The stickers must be vapourware

      As a student, I worked in a computer store where we built custom PCs and we used to put a sort of aluminium (very fragile) sticker on the back of the machine, on the edge of the outer casing and the inner framework.

      If we didn't do this, people would order 256 MBs of RAM, take half of it out and come back claiming there was only 128 MB in it. Or harddisks would be switched, video cards, etc.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    6. Re:Vapourware by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      You're quite dumb.

      You calling me "dumb" is like Paris Hilton calling someone a "slut." You haven't even figured out how to create a user account on Slashdot.

      He's talking about stickers on/inside of the case of the Mac Mini to let Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider [discern? determine? know? discover? figure out? How hard is it to include verbs?] that you have opened it and have thus voided the warranty. Not the warranty stickers on a harddrive[sic], which has NO user serviceable parts, and shouldn't be opened.

      Then he didn't express himself very clearly since he spoke about such stickers in a generic sense, even bringing in a reference to a non-Apple product. Given your inability to create an articulate sentence (see above), I'm not surprised that you were on his wavelength.

    7. Re:Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 'cause the apple repair technicians are just going to open the case and inspect the sticker and, oh, wait...

      I have seen devices (stickers) which take a while to change colour for example after they have been peeled. With these, the difference between peeled minutes ago and peeled hours ago makes it possible to tell.

      Also, I have seen entries in firmware which can count case openings.

      There are ways.

    8. Re:Vapourware by spleck · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points today...

      I looked at some of your other posts, and while many have insightful, intelligent comments, some (like parent) are just cocky and stupid at the same time. Are you trying to be an intelligent troll?

      Come on, you replied to a post that said "I do wonder if theres some sort of sticker or seal on the inside to let Apple know youve opened the case." You HAD to know what they were talking about, and not somehow confuse a Mac Mini with a hard drive.

      As for some of your other posts... If it wasn't time to go to lunch, I would have something to say about you exclaiming that 500GB will hold a whole 4 hours of HDTV. I'm just hoping that you were making some kind of goober joke.

    9. Re:Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are the jackass to pay for slashdot.

    10. Re:Vapourware by codemachine · · Score: 1

      Hence why cataloging part numbers is a good idea.

      Much better than locking your customers out of their own cases.

    11. Re:Vapourware by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      No, I'm just not a trailer-park leech like you.

  24. That's not the problem by tepples · · Score: 1

    Images, audio, and video are generally static files. Modern web servers and networking stacks are more than capable of handling lots of simultaneous static file transfers, even on a low-end CPU. A server hosting lots of static files would run into either of the following bottlenecks long before the CPU gets taxed:

    • Some cheaper versions of proprietary web server software impose artificial limits on concurrent connections. Circumvent this by installing and configuring Apache HTTP Server, which is available for GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, Darwin, and even Microsoft Windows NT 5+.
    • Incumbent telcos still charge through the nose for the bandwidth needed to send video over IP unicast, and they won't route multicast because it would compete with cash-cow unicast.
  25. You're joking, right ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative


    Just in case you're not: the slot at the top isn't a PCI slot, it's the DIMM slot...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:You're joking, right ? by psetzer · · Score: 1

      It'll seat whatever you've got lying around the house, as long as you use enough force...

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
  26. Dissecting a Mac is like ... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    [evil]

    Dissecting a MiniMac is sort of like ripping the limbs off of your kid sister's Barbie dolls and glueing them back onto your GI Joe action figures ... I can imagine the expressions on their face when they see the all the pieces laying there on the table ...

    [/evil]

    1. Re:Dissecting a Mac is like ... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      This reminded me of an ipod (2nd gen model) a room-mate sold me. He was a mac fanatic, and he always believed in taking the machine to the dealer to have anything done to it - as an example he had an I-Lamp and wanted to upgrade the ram and took it to the shop where they charged him like 150$ to do this (256 megs as I recall). I don't have a mac, but I liked the ipod :).

      Anyhow the battery died - and I found an aftermarket battery (just fyi - it seems to go for about a week or two with normal on and off use). Anyhow installation required pulling the thing apart - which as you'll notice has no screws. I found that if you file off an old credit card you can use it like a shim and along the top and the sides and the whole thing will pop apart (its all held together with leaf springs along the sides and bottom). I was working on this on the kitchen table, and he came in shocked that I had dared to take apart the holy grail of apple technology.

      Overall it was pretty easy for me - and honestly if you look at it you wouldn't know it had an aftermarket battery in it - or had even been opened. I don't think people should shy away from installing their own mac-mini upgrades even though it means prying open the case.

  27. Unusual places?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the FA:
    the rounded corners should help cramming it into unusual places
    I know I'm going to regret asking, but just what are the usual "unusual places"?

    1. Re:Unusual places?? by temojen · · Score: 1

      Jack o'lanterns, Sour alien pops containers, etc.

    2. Re:Unusual places?? by numist · · Score: 1

      G4 Cubes, Ammo Boxes, Gas Cans, and Guitars, to name a few...

    3. Re:Unusual places?? by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

      goatse guys 5.25" internal bay. Tubgirl handles streaming media.

    4. Re:Unusual places?? by Wizarth · · Score: 4, Funny

      What... like the back of a Volkswagen?

    5. Re:Unusual places?? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. :-P

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:Unusual places?? by Reverant · · Score: 1

      Please don't tell me that you were thinking of the usual .cx places...

    7. Re:Unusual places?? by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Ewwww gross, but funny (although PLEASE let tubgirl be banished from my retinal memory).

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    8. Re:Unusual places?? by orasio · · Score: 1

      Hey!!
      Tubgirl is not even in the same league as goatse.
      Let's stop that kind of comment, naming them as if they were in the same level of relevance.
      Tubgirl is gross, but it's human.
      Goatse, on the other hand, is offensive in many more ways, it's sexually offensive, because only a small part of the public enjoy watching guys from that perspective, it's gross, it's unusual from the physiological perspective, and it doesn't go away from your retina.
      Some fat woman shitting is something I can cope with muich better than with that. Nurses get to see that kind of thing pretty often, don't they?

    9. Re:Unusual places?? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Any place that you'd need a doctor present to remove it again.

      --
      I don't get it.
    10. Re:Unusual places?? by jedinite · · Score: 1

      welcome to my friends list.

      Best timed slashdot comment i've seen in ages. :)

      --

      ---------
      There is no try at jedinite.com
    11. Re:Unusual places?? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Yep - that was exactly what came into my mind when reading the parent post.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    12. Re:Unusual places?? by EDSdrone · · Score: 1

      :What... like the back of a Volkswagen? Watched "An Evening with Kevin Smith" last night, it's just released in the UK. Well worth the 9.99 - get it now Silent Bob fans! Hey... You think I could replace my Power Supply fans with Silent Bob fans?

  28. EyeTV (HD) + Mac Mini? by sulli · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried this combination as a small footprint HD video jukebox?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:EyeTV (HD) + Mac Mini? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as how they won't ship until the 22nd, probably not. However, see some posts above for further conjecture on the matter.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:EyeTV (HD) + Mac Mini? by kenelbow · · Score: 1

      Considering that EyeTV needs a dual G5 system to playback HD video, its unlikely.

      --
      What witty sig? I can't be witty, I'm a Methodist.
  29. EyeTV is too expensive. by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    I help design and develop digital set top boxes for a living and EyeTV's products are far too expensive. I've been considering a Mac Mini as a front room media centre but the sad fact is that I can actually get hold of a DVR for my digital satelite service cheaper than an EyeTV box. What I want is a USB2 or preferably Firewire full screen capture device and haven't been able to find one.

    1. Re:EyeTV is too expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find this discussion also at MacinTouch.com on the Mac mini topic. Someone there said that they have put their Firewire output direct from their cable box into their Mac and used Shareware to record to MPEG from Firewire and then output via DVI to a plasma screen TV. This was not an HD solution, and the Mac was not a Mac mini obviously. Full PVR functions are missing but the shareware can link to the US cable TV scheduling website that Eye TV uses for schedules.

      The firewire cable box was easy to get but it's harder to find DVI on TVs. ( According to the post on MacinTouch )

  30. From the "interesting read" link... by Joff_NZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    $399 Dell PC: "No Wireless"
    $499 Minimac: "AirPort Extreme- and Bluetooth-ready"


    So.... that'd be the "no wireless" option for the minimac too?

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    1. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wireless gizmos come in two parts: the antenna and the guts. The antennas are already built into all Mac hardware. All you need to add is the guts.

      With the Dell, on the other hand, you get neither antennas nor guts. That means that, if you add wireless via a card or some damn thing, it's either going to perform really poorly or it's going to have a big-ass antenna sticking out of it.

      Advantage: Apple.

    2. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, or they could've changed "No Wireless" to 802.11g Ready/Bluetooth-ready.

    3. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Interesting

      well, for the dell pc you could buy bluetooth and wifi for about 1/4 the price of the cost of selecting the bluetooth+wifi option for the mac.

      nothing about the mac mini is cheap beyond the initial unit.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how he dismisses the utility of slots and then makes a big deal about the lack of firewire and non-shared video (both of which could be added very cheaply, using THE FUCKING SLOTS).

    5. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already have a bunch of "big-ass" wires sticking out of the back of your Mini-Mac, so who gives a fuck.

    6. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This was always a big point of contention for me. On the dell you could get any (because all network cards work with windows) 25$ 802.11G card that has a small antenna sticking out of the back of the pci slot (you wouldn't notice it if its sitting with its back to the wall). Wheras with apple - even if you had a pci slot you're stuck buying the one or two cards that work with OSX for quite a bit more.

    7. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And wouldn't you personaly rather pay a little more for something that you know works out of the box? No weird incompatabilities, no poorly written drivers by bad 3rd parties, etc. Sure, say you can pick up so and so's hardware and it works for you for less, but at that Apple's hardware just works and if it has problems? Apple is likely to just replace the defective hardware barely asking a question. Hell last time I got a Linksys wireless card exchanged it was a gawd awful nightmare with what dumb assed, acenine things they had me do to get new hardware and that was dealing with Habib's Indian accent. Apple? Well I don't ever remember Apple even thinking about putting call centers outside the US. Just an impact on the total user experience.

    8. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      yes, but I dont want a shitty ass antenna fucking up my portable desktop (oh, whats that? Your Dell isn't a hair under 3 pounds and smaller than a stack of jewel cases?) blow me ass hats. For the portability and internal antennas, it's worth every cent. Do you bitch because laptops are more expensive per performance than desktops? No? This is a laptop with desktop packaging. Shit happens. Deal.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    9. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      blow me ass hats. Shit happens. Deal.
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!

      Wow.

      You've sold me.

      I mean.. .. Wow.

    10. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      portable desktop? what the fuck?

      you're totally lost touch with reality! welcome to the iProduct distortion area.

      the whole point was just that IT'S NOT CHEAP!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Any wireless card with the broadcom chipset works with OS X as an Airport/Airport Extreme Card.

      Most people would rather use the Apple branded stuff though, since there is a dedicated slot for it and an integral antenna. Of couse, you have no choice if you have a Mac with no expansion slots.

      On a Powermac or a 15" or 17" Powerbook, you can fit a PC wireless card and have it work right away with no drivers to install.

    12. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by TylerL82 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the Mac mini will NOT have the required antennas unless you BTO the computer with AirPort and/or Bluetooth.

      First Mac to do that since the introduction of AirPort.

    13. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by anothergene · · Score: 1


      $399 Dell PC: "No Wireless"
      $499 Minimac: "AirPort Extreme- and Bluetooth-ready"

      So.... that'd be the "no wireless" option for the minimac too?


      Sure the Dell is cheaper, but you have to put up with Windoze and a piece of $%#^ Dell product.

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
    14. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're stupid

    15. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      You cannot say that the wireless card industry has done a bang up job of standardizing external antennae connections. I haven't been much in the market recently, but I recall lucent and cisco cards having wildly different connections.

      Apple takes care of this, the way pc laptop manufacturers do. I imagine if I could buy my hp nc6000 without wireless (I don't recall if that is an option), it would still have the internal antennae stuff, but good luck finding the right mini PCI card in the aftermarket *cheaply* (although with centrino, it is probably on the motherboard, but the sentiment holds true for non centrino systems that use mini PCI).

      ostiguy

    16. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by sadida_333 · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. Rather than pay for an extended cab pickup, I'll just put a couch in the bed of the truck.

    17. Re:From the "interesting read" link... by ptudor · · Score: 1

      Really, thanks for taking the time to correct statements in error. I almost had to in your place. But I can't help but wonder if it's really worth your time; ie lost cause and all that. I mean, how many people would Genuinely be surprised if they actually looked at a PowerBook and saw a PC Card slot?

  31. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs hates slots altogether. When the original Mac came out he bragged about it being "hacker-proof" and they had to fire the guy befor they could get the Mac into the workstation market. So now they only begrudingly allow slots in the pro market where they have to, and everyone else "doesn't need them" (because Steve says they don't).

  32. Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ePC computers have priority, they've been around for about three years, I am sure they served as a source of inspiration for apple.

    Besides, EPCs are more versatile, being intel compatible, run linux better, more operating systems are available for them. A friend of mine installed FreeBSD, Solaris, and QNX on an ePC (in addition to linux)

    On the mac side linux is much harder to install, whenever apple introduces a new machine, no distribution works on it. You are stuck for a while with the proprietary OS from Apple.

    1. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You are stuck for a while with the proprietary OS from Apple.

      Which happens to come with a full set of GNU tools and an X11 server.

      There are far worse things on this earth to be "stuck" with, given that a lot of Linux programs have Mac ports now to at least run in X11.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by wildBoar · · Score: 1

      Ok, you have OS X which is a serious Unix flavour, well supported, best GUI on any Unix(Linux included) - and you want to install Linux.

      Aside from the fact most stuff has an OS X port, why would you run Linux ?

    3. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Aside from the fact most stuff has an OS X port, why would you run Linux ?


      Because Linux is Open Spource, whereas OS X is not? Because with OS X you are stuck with Aqua, whereas on Linux you can choose from several different GUI's (yes, you say that OS X has "the best GUI of any UNIX", but that is really just a matter of taste)? Because OS X always behaves in certain ways (which you may not like), whereas Linux-distros offer more choice? Because Linux runs on several different architecture, whereas OS X does not?

      Seriously: I find it rather surprising that some MAc-users think that "Linux-users have ZERO reason to run Linux, they will surely switch to OS X!". In reality it's not as simple as that. While OS X is nice, it's just another proprietary OS like Windows is. It may have more eye-candy that Windows does, but eye-candy is not the reason why people use Linux.

      Yes, I'm buying the Mini and I am going to try our OS X.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      Actually OSX is a LOT different from Windows and a lot less proprietary. In fact only the "eye candy" is proprietary. All the stuff we used to call "the operating system" is open source. You can download it right here: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.3. 7/

    5. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      But all the really cool stuff is closed (like Quartz and Quartz Extreme). Fact is that while the absolute core of the OS might be open, in reality the OS is closed-source.

      Yes, Apple is better than MS on this respect. But no, it's still not open source like Linux is. Linux is open from top to bottom.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    6. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by Senjaz · · Score: 1

      Because Linux is open source, whereas Darwin um is open source. Because with OS X you are stuck with Aqua, as long as you aren't prepared to tinker and run rooted or rootless X11 and choose a different window manager other than the one Apple supplies. Because OS X behaves in certain ways which tend to be very consistent but if you don't like them you can certainly start using native X11 apps to get back the inconsistency that you love. Linux distros offer more choice but really they are just a parallel to the many forms of BSD of which Mac OS is one that you can run on a Mac. Because Linux runs on several different architectures and um so does Darwin.

      Seriously I get the point you are trying to make, I just disagree with all the examples you give. But I can see 2 reasons for a Mac owner to put Linux on their machine. First if they specifically want to learn how to use Linux, second if you dig the spirit of the GPL and want to involve yourself in it from the system level to user level.

      --
      Don't blame me - this .sig had steal me written all over it.
    7. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by zpok · · Score: 1

      "Aside from the fact most stuff has an OS X port, why would you run Linux ?"

      I don't want to run Linux, but would like to contest this remark. Most stuff doesn't have an OS X port. Not native anyway, and if it has, more likely than not it's more sort of a Proof of Concept port. The Read Me always reads like this: "Don't compare this to the Windows or Linux port. There are still many problems to solve. But We Did IT!

      Which is nice of course, but that's it then. No follow up, no bug fixing.

      Not giving critique, but that's pretty much the state of things as far as native OS X FOSS porting goes.

      Of course, on Fink/X11 you'll find most anything your heart desires...

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    8. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini may help to improve this situation. I know what you mean, because I've done it myself: I don't have a modern Mac (my latest is an SE/30), but I've built stuff on the SourceForge compile farm for Mac OS X users -- and that's about all I can do. But now I'm planning to get a Mac Mini, so I'll see how it really works, not just how it looks over an SSH session. I'm thinking other developers will follow suit.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    9. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I misunderstood what you where saying. I thought you were saying Aqua was just "eye candy" but you are actually saying that's the "cool stuff". The truth of the matter is you can run Darwin without Aqua and still have a fully functioning machine including X11 and a Window Manager. All open source. If this doesn't constitute a full open source operating system I'm not sure what you call Linux.

    10. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by zpok · · Score: 1

      Nice :-)

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    11. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see any user-submitted pathces in OS X( Although I haven't really studied the matter). Now have I seen improvements from Darwin trickle down to other projects. And just about everyhting on my Linux-machine IS open-soure The kernel, the GUI (which is closed in the MAc), the apps (Apple-apps are closed, with few exceptions). Only thing that's closed-source (to my knowledge) is few games and the NVIDIA-drivers.

      Sure you can run Darwin just fine. And it's open. But the key technologies that the user sees (and that could be used in other projects as well) are closed. If Apple is such a big supporter of Open Source, why is Quartz and Quartz Extreme closed? Why aren't they offering some of that tech to X.org, or KDE or Gnome? Or how about Spotlight?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    12. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Because Linux is open source, whereas Darwin um is open source.


      When I'm talking about OS X I'm NOT talking about Darwin. I'm talking about the Kernel, Darwin, Aqua, Quartz, Quartz Extreme, Spotlight, iMovie, iPhoto etc. etc. Darwin does not equal OS X. Or are you saying that if I run Darwin, I will have an OS that is identical to OS X, all the bells and whistles included?

      Because OS X behaves in certain ways which tend to be very consistent but if you don't like them you can certainly start using native X11 apps to get back the inconsistency that you love.


      I wasn't talking about how apps behave, I was talking about how the OS as a whole behaves. And that includes apps, the GUI the administration-tasks, software-installation and the like.

      Because Linux runs on several different architectures and um so does Darwin.


      And like I said, Darwin is not Mac OS X. Does OS X run on x86? If it does, why are there so many people insiting that Apple should port OS X to x86?

      I'm talking about OS X as a whole, you are talking about Darwin, which is only a part of OS X. we are talking about two different things!

      But I can see 2 reasons for a Mac owner to put Linux on their machine. First if they specifically want to learn how to use Linux, second if you dig the spirit of the GPL and want to involve yourself in it from the system level to user level.


      Or maybe, just maybe, because they actually *shock and horror* like Linux more than they like OS X? Or is such a thing completely impossible?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    13. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      If you haven't studied the matter then I guess you wouldn't see any user-submitted patches.

      For improvements that have "trickled down" from Darwin check http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/

      There you will find things like streaming server, open directory, rendezvous and a bunch of other stuff that some people find "cool" and "useful".

      Whether technologies are "key" or not depends on the user. If you want a stable OS to run as a streaming video server then quartz and quartz extreme are indeed "eye candy".

      I do take your point - Linux is open source top-to-bottom but I really do think Apple have made huge strides in their open source efforts and are a valuable member of the open source community.

    14. Re:Apple stole the iMac Mini idea from ePC by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      I do take your point - Linux is open source top-to-bottom but I really do think Apple have made huge strides in their open source efforts and are a valuable member of the open source community.


      yes they are, and I'm not disputing that. They have made some excellent contributions to GCC, KHTML and the like, and their contributions are more than welcome. And they have in general behaved very well when it comes to open source. That said, their OS is not open source as such. IBM has done alot for open source, yet they too have closed-source OS's.

      OS X is built on open source, but it's not open source as a whole
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  33. Images gallery of all Apples case designs? by julie-h · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if Apple's collection of case designs can be seen somewhere?

    They have made quite a few cool ones, so I can hardly remember them all.

    1. Re:Images gallery of all Apples case designs? by wvitXpert · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's every computer Apple has ever made. http://www.apple-history.com/frames/?

    2. Re:Images gallery of all Apples case designs? by GerbilSocks · · Score: 1

      Evolution of the form factor http://tofslie.com/files/evolution_apple.jpg

    3. Re:Images gallery of all Apples case designs? by GerbilSocks · · Score: 2, Insightful
    4. Re:Images gallery of all Apples case designs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a chance, check out a book called:

      Appledesign: The Work of the Apple Industrial Design Group

      Very good coffee table book on pre-iMac apple design. BTW, this was my best investment ever: New ~$50, Used ~$270!

  34. But.... by dethl · · Score: 1

    That was soooo fun to do back then :)

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      back then?

  35. Had the video for awhile by dcstimm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had this video for awhile because I am training to be a Apple Portable / Desktop Tech, If you purchuse the $299 Apple Service Training you get this and any other Take apart video for free. THe person that leaked this could be in some serious trouble..

    1. Re:Had the video for awhile by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I bet you its on IRC efnet mac channels as per usual aswell as all the Techy manuals and 10.4 etc...

      Only snotty nosed managers go after a lawyer like a nerdy kid in the playground asking for mummy ;-)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Had the video for awhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So putty knives are the typical tools of the trade? I expected some specialized $20 tool would be 'needed' to open them up...

    3. Re:Had the video for awhile by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      Apple trains people to use putty knives to work on their hardware?

    4. Re:Had the video for awhile by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      its an offical part from apple

    5. Re:Had the video for awhile by jedinite · · Score: 1

      which they happen to refer to, in the video, as a putty knife?

      --

      ---------
      There is no try at jedinite.com
    6. Re:Had the video for awhile by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      It's the iPut. Look for it soon at an Apple Store near you.

  36. baaaa-pple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The more these things get mentioned, the more I want one."

    ...said the sheep.

  37. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Informative

    What would you do with the PC Card slot though? While what I quote from another post of mine below applies to PCI slots, it's almost equaly applicable to PC Card slots as well:

    Untill you get to thinking about the slots and what you need them for. Example, my PC sitting here has 5 PCI slots and 1 AGP slot.

    The AGP slot is occupied by a video card, which I just recently replaced for the first time in 5 years. On the mac mini, that's already built onto the board with an ATI chipset.

    1 PCI slot is used by my Soudblaster card, which I just recently upgraded, again for the first time in 5 years, and that was because the card never worked right in the first place and this happened to be the time I was upgrading things. On the mac mini, this is built into the system

    1 PCI slot is occupied by an ethernet card, un upgraded in 5 years. Gigabit is built into the mac mini

    1 slot contains a USB/Firewire card, again, un upgraded, and built into the mac mini.

    The other two slots remain unused, and for the forseeable future, I have no use for them. In the end, they're actualy a waste.

    So when I look at the mac mini, it has everything I would use PCI/AGP slots for built in.

    So then the question becomes well what if you want to upgrade?

    Well, when I did my mass upgrade for the first time in 5 years (until now, I had only added RAM), I bought a new motherboard, a new processor, new graphics card, new soundcard and new RAM. My total cost came out to about $600 after rebates.

    After reflecting on this, it occurs to me, that if a mac mini suits my needs, by the time I would decide to upgrade it, I might as well just buy a new one for $500.

    In fact, for the first time, my computer would actualy be a disposable product. Something that I could (theoreticaly) just discard and buy a new one when it no longer served my needs, and it would be roughly price equivilant to upgrading the system.

    So in the end, having PCI slots and an accessable case on the mac mini would seem to be more of a waste than a benefit.

    Of course, you can always argue that hard core gamers and power users have other things and upgrade more frequently, but I argue that no hardcore gamer/power user is buying a $500 computer.


    And to end, I should note, I have a PC Card slot on my powerbook. In 5 years of ownership, I have used it ONCE, and that was to see if the new Nextel broadband wireless cards would work with a mac even without special drivers (it didn't BTW).

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  38. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by sedna · · Score: 1


    Well, the e-PC-3 with similar configuration as the Mac mini (Combodrive and 40GB HD, windows home edition and Microsoft works) is about $1400. Quite pricey for a PC-card... Please compare the specs AND the price for the Apple products. Yes there are smaller, cheaper notebooks or ones with better prestanda. Are there any ones smaller, cheaper and with better prestanda? How well would the iBook sell if it wass $100 more expensive but with a PC-card? How many people percent-vise are using those slots? No, not "I do for my GPS", but percent vise?

  39. If you want DDR slots... by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    mac mini wins because it has no free agp slot, no free pci slots, no free hd slots, no free ddr slots

    The EMS USB2 adapter will add two slots for DDR to any machine with USB ports.

    1. Re:If you want DDR slots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be good for the Lotus users, but most newer programs require XMS.

    2. Re:If you want DDR slots... by tepples · · Score: 1

      most newer programs require XMS

      For those newer programs that do not work correctly with the EMS adapter, you can use the Boom PS Joy Converter, which provides one DDR slot. A list of other recommended adapters is available here.

      (background for mods: EMS is both a PC memory expansion standard from the DOS days that predated XMS and a manufacturer of PlayStation to PC controller adapters. DDR is both a PC memory interface and a video game that uses a specialized PlayStation controller.)

    3. Re:If you want DDR slots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of those, it's good kit.

  40. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Informative

    Umm...

    A composite video/svideo adapter for the mac mini costs $20 from apple.

    It has a v.92 56k modem built in

    It is Airport Extreme Ready(ie 802.11g capable)

  41. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen lots and lots of PowerBooks in my line of work. Practically everybody I encounter, professionally, has one.

    Know how many PC cards I've seen? Zero. Nary a one.

    Since you're going to put the necessary ports on the machine anyway, and since you're going to build wireless antennas in anyway, what possible use is there for a PC card slot? Leave it out and keep costs down.

  42. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "they have the same weight and size as the iMAc mini. Only the videocard is better in the iMac mini, otherwise ePC-2-3 are better, more ports (e-PC3-2 firewire, 4Highspeed USB, serial, parallel,video out AND A PC CARD SLOT. IN ADDITION USERS ARE ALLOWED TO OPEN THE BOX"

    Well, that's all well and good if you only want ports, but lets look at the facts.

    EZ-GO ePC-2 (Base System)
    Processor: 1.1Ghz intel celeron
    memory: 128 MB SDRAM
    video: integrated video (11.8MB max shared)
    HD: 40GB
    Optical Drive: 24x CD-ROM
    Price: $589

    mac mini (Base System)
    Processor 1.25Ghz Power PC G4
    memory: 256 MB
    Video: Radeon 9200 w/ 32MB memory
    HD: 40GB
    Optical Drive: DVD ROM/CD-RW
    Price: $499

    It looks to me like the mac mini is a superior system in almost every way, and costs $90 less.

  43. PCCard=small size+upgradability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A PC card combines a small size with the advantage of exapandability. New technologies may show up and you can expand the iMac mini by buying a PC Card. With a PC card slot you dont need a big ugly machine to upgrade.

    In my opinion the main advantage of an iMAC mini is not its price, but its small weight and size. Unfortunately, without a PC card slot, it is (almost) useless.

    Myself I have 7 PC cards and I use them almost everyday. These include cards for old technologies (such as SCSI) and new tecnologies (such as g-wireless)

    1. Re:PCCard=small size+upgradability by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      The SCSI adapter you would have me on, but G wireless is already supported by the mac mini, just drop in an airport card.

      Really it's a matter of whether your application can be handled another way. For example, I'm almost positive you can get a SCSI to firewire adapter for roughly the same price as a PC card.

      There are other ways to add technologies that don't involve PC card slots, and though I can't say for certain I would imagine for the average consumer, the throughput of firewire is more than sufficient.

      That isn't to say that some people couldn't benefit from the PC card slot, but I wonder whether that number of people is greater than those who would benefit from not having it.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  44. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    There are firewire adapters for composite video in, the mini can take an airport card internaly and the modem is v.92.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  45. I can get a sat PVR too... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I actually have a ReplayTV, that I've not activated and can't use just as a VCR (which I would be happy with).

    I really want a PVR that does not cost extra per month and lets me do what I like with the video, so that's the appeal of a more expensive Mac soltution for me - plus I would really like being able to use it as a hub to act as my primary iTunes store and as a way to display shared iPhoto libraries on the TV more easily.

    I agree that a firewire full screen capture device would be nice. The EyeTV 200 does that (has a composite & S-Video input along with stero jacks) , and I think the EyeTV 500 also would have the same inputs in addition to the HD stuff. The wierd thing is that I thought the EyeTV 200 was cheaper, but at the moment it's the same price on the page. Last week it was $50 cheaper as a MacWorld show special.

    I haven't really seen any other video->firewire converters that were that much less sadly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I can get a sat PVR too... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      I'm here in the UK and with my subscription Sky (my sat company) doesn't charge extra for the PVR support. Plus, because in Europe we have SCART with it's RGB output it's about as good an analogue feed to a TV you can get. So basically a Mac Mini set up would have to compete with that and EyeTVs are expensive over here in Europe.

      I really need to talk to the RF guys here where I work because I'm sure we could come up with a digital front end that plugs in to the firewire port of the Mac, then you just need software on the mac to demultiplex the transport stream and extract the MPEG.

    2. Re:I can get a sat PVR too... by spleck · · Score: 1

      The EyeTV 500 is solely for digital content. It will not work with analog cable/air signals. It just tunes and spits out the MPEG stream and lets the computer handle the rest.

      The EyeTV 200 is an analog tuner and A/D converter.

  46. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by tepples · · Score: 1

    A composite video/svideo adapter for the mac mini costs $20 from apple.

    Is that in and out or just out?

  47. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by SkipRosebaugh · · Score: 1

    Could it possibly have occurred to you to look at the mac mini's tech specs before you say that? Let's see, in reverse order:
    3. v.93 modem: built-in on all models
    2. wireless networking: can order with it installed, or buy the card later and either have Apple install it for you, or do it yourself.
    1. Firewire is meant for moving video around. Yeah, the adapters to hook analog video up to firewire can be a little expensive. But it's not like it's not an option.

    Please actually look at the computer you're panning before you pan it. Thanks.

  48. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I see you didn't read the specs on the Mac mini. It can be upgraded to Wifi and Bluetooth via and internal adapter. So you can connect not only to your wirless network, but also to your bluetooth cellphone or pda. It also has a built in fax/modem. So you can send and receive faxes, as well as use dialup internet access. As for the composite video, there are several USB2 devices for that purpose. I've used a couple of them. They work just fine. But unless you are converting VHS tapes to a digital format, Firewire is a much better option. But if you must, the cost of a USB2 capture device is about $90. A good one is called Interview 3.0 from Daystar Technologies.

  49. Size... by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    'The board itself is slightly smaller than Mini-ITX at about 160mm square by our estimations, and includes Ethernet, Modem, DVI/VGA, 2 x USB, Firewire and Audio connectors (sadly not optical).'

    They mean 160 cm^2 = 16,000mm^2. Smaller than a CD case.
    160mm^2 is a coin's surface.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    1. Re:Size... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      160 mm square != 160 mm^2.

      160 mm square means 160 mm to each side.

      160 mm squared means 160 square millimeters in area. I think we're all pretty sure that isn't what they meant.

      However, 160 cm^2 would be about 12.5 cm square, or roughly 4.9 inches square.

      160mm square would be 16 cm square, or roughly 6.3 inches square.

      Mini-ITX boards are roughly 17cm by 17cm, so the Mini Mac board most likely is 160mm square.

      In other words, 160mm x 160mm, or 25600 mm^2.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:Size... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Square, not squared. The area would be 160^2 mm.

      --
      I am trolling
  50. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Mac mini HAS a traditional v.92 modem. Go here, and look right next to the ethernet port.

    I'm actually considering getting one of these (If enough suckers^W^W^W^W^W^W^Wpeople sign up with my sig!). I normally hate Macs, but since I've wanted just an extra machine to store stuff and occasionally mess around with, this suits my needs perfectly, plus it hides well, and It's cheap!

    Ah crap, I said I hate Macs... there goes my karma!

    --
    "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

    - Seneca
  51. Hey... by WSSA · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...that's my sister!

    1. Re:Hey... by EuroChild · · Score: 1

      Heh - you must be a G5...


      ...I need sleep, okay?

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
  52. Comp in is external device by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You can get composite video in via external USB/Firewire converters, of course most people getting video in would be loading it via Firewire from the camcorder.

    But then not many PC's I know of come with composite video in either.

    Other people covered the rest of the things you got wrong. Basically, instead of slots you can expand this via firewire/USB. To me it's worth it for the small form factor that results.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  53. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    its out only.

    In would require a $130 USB2.0 TV tuner

  54. MOD PARENT UP as FUNNY! by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

    The DDR part is the best ;)

  55. Sadly does not state speed or physical size by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The Apple page does not indicate the size of the drive or RPM, just that it's an Ultra-ATA.

    Probably a 4200 laptop drive.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  56. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by diamondsw · · Score: 1

    The Mac Mini already has a built-in V92 modem, built-in video out (VGA, DVI, composite, and S-Video), built-in wireless, and built-in bluetooth (the latter two are options, but I'd certainly recommend them). As for video-in, as many others have pointed out El Gato systems makes a whole series of USB 2.0-based video-in solutions for not much money.

    So, you can have everything you just mentioned, and be using just one of your USB ports.

    Check the specs - Macs have traditionally put a LOT of functionality on the motherboard. Sometimes for better (ethernet for the last 15 years, recently firewire, USB2, DVI), sometimes for the worse (ADC, subpar sound output until quite recently).

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  57. Not bad Apple by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    This may be just the thing to get me to buy a new mac for the first time in 8 years.

    I'm thinking about Mandrake 10.1 PPC, a power inverter and a kick ass car computer.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Not bad Apple by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Why waste power with an inverter? There are designs on the Internet for 12V PC power supplies. One of these could easily be adapted to run a Mac Mini (or any other Mac motherboard).

    2. Re:Not bad Apple by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to put Mandrake on it when you've already got a beautiful unix based OS with it. And why on earth would you want a PowerPC box to put linux on? Bob

    3. Re:Not bad Apple by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I second beelsebob -- the entire point is that it's a Mac! If you're going to take away OS X, you might as well get an Epia instead.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Not bad Apple by nathanh · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why on earth would you want to put Mandrake on it when you've already got a beautiful unix based OS with it. And why on earth would you want a PowerPC box to put linux on? Bob

      Why should he not?

      Linux rocks. Mac Mini rocks. The two together obviously rock twice as hard.

      Are you seriously suggesting that nobody could possibly prefer Linux once they've used MacOS X? Think again, buddy.

    5. Re:Not bad Apple by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      You're obviously at the wrong site. This is the site where people overclocking their TV remotes, or installing Linux on their Fridge, or reverse-engineering their thermostats so that they can install Nethack on the LCD panel, is considered cool.

      Rarely are such activities (including forcing linux on a mac-mini) very practical, but they shed light on how devices are engineered, and serve as learning opportunities for gear-heads. For all intents and purposes, there was no pragmatic reason to climb to the top of Mt Everest either. ;)

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    6. Re:Not bad Apple by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Well, the Mini wipes the floor with Epia's when it comes to performance, while the price is more or less the same. And it looks better than Epia-cases do (Well, Hush does look good, but it's uber-expensive as well)

      I'm buying the Mini as well. And if OS X is not for me, I will rip it out and put Gentoo in there instead. And what are you going to do about it? Hit me in the face?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    7. Re:Not bad Apple by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to put Mandrake on it when you've already got a beautiful unix based OS with it.

      Because I happen to like Mandrake.

      And why on earth would you want a PowerPC box to put linux on? Bob

      Performance.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:Not bad Apple by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously suggesting that nobody could possibly prefer Linux once they've used MacOS X?

      I've got no arguments with that. ;)

    9. Re:Not bad Apple by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      No Epia is going to handle numbers (Drive Visualizations) like a 1.4 GHz G4.

      Next question.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Not bad Apple by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      Loading Linux on a Mac is like putting a engine of a Ford Fiesta in a Cadillac...

    11. Re:Not bad Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loading Linux on a Mac is like putting a engine of a Ford Fiesta in a Cadillac...

      Right, never confuse cool and cold.

      Anyway, if you are still obssesed with penguins and polar bears remember that both can be installed, so you can use GNU/Linux when nobody sees you and boot on Mac OS X when you receive a visit (or need urgently to play a Microsoft game).

      If in you neighbourhood Finnish kernels are unnacceptable OpenDarwin might be an option.

      Anonymous coward Mac2Lin switcher.

    12. Re:Not bad Apple by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, the Mac might have fewer issues driving a 30" Apple Cinema Display, but it would work perfectly well for the 6" display in a car.

      Alright, I admit it. You're right -- the Mac is more powerful. I wasn't complaining about using a Mac, though, I was complaining about not using OS X.

      An OS X car PC is something I've dreamed about sicne I got an iBook a year ago; now the only problem is that my car isn't nice enough to be worth it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Not bad Apple by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No, just feel sad about the terrible waste of a perfectly good Mac. Don't get me wrong, Gentoo is great -- I use it on all my x86s. But I think (and hope) you'll find that OS X is for you -- I know I certainly haven't thought about putting Gentoo/Linux on my iBook. Now, Gentoo/MacOS, on the other hand...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    14. Re:Not bad Apple by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, I'm suggesting that if you want to run linux then you're really really dumb for buying a PowerPC box.

    15. Re:Not bad Apple by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Um, so you're suggesting that a mac mini is going to outperform an Athlon 64 1.8Ghz system that you could buy for the same price? I don't think so... The advantages of the mac mini are in the fact that it runs OS X and that it's small.

    16. Re:Not bad Apple by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, the Mac might have fewer issues driving a 30" Apple Cinema Display, but it would work perfectly well for the 6" display in a car.

      I'm thinking more like a 10" or 12" LCD, maybe a 15" one.

      Alright, I admit it. You're right -- the Mac is more powerful. I wasn't complaining about using a Mac, though, I was complaining about not using OS X.

      I don't need OS X to play MP3s. I know more about Linux's internals than I do about OS X's.

      An OS X car PC is something I've dreamed about sicne I got an iBook a year ago; now the only problem is that my car isn't nice enough to be worth it.

      Neither of my vehicles is really nice enough for a car PC, but you have to start somewhere, right?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    17. Re:Not bad Apple by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Um, so you're suggesting that a mac mini is going to outperform an Athlon 64 1.8Ghz system that you could buy for the same price?

      No. I'm suggesting that the Mac Mini is going to outperform any other computer that I can fit under the driver's seat of my Camaro. The question was why not just use an Epia based computer.

      The advantages of the mac mini are in the fact that it runs OS X and that it's small.

      For me the advantages are that it's small and can power some kick ass visualizations.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:Not bad Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Loading Linux on a Mac is like putting a engine of a Ford Fiesta in a Cadillac...


      Well, I'm just waiting for a few months until NetBSD runs.. then I'll upgrade to a supercharged twelve cylinder Lamborghini.
  58. ePC: For $1400 you get a 2.8GHZ P4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it is worth the money to have such a small and powerful machine. I own one and is much better than any laptop.

    I bought one 18 months and I use it for geophysical computations on the field. I run linux on it, and have no monitor. I use it connected to my Centrino laptop (Thinkpad 1.7GHZ) It is almost three times faster than my Centrino, this may be due to the special nature of the code I run, but anyway the performance is impressive.

    1. Re: ePC: For $1400 you get a 2.8GHZ P4 by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      blah blah but anyway the performance is impressive

      Dude, if it's so great why are you in here arguing the toss about the new Mac?

    2. Re: ePC: For $1400 you get a 2.8GHZ P4 by sedna · · Score: 1


      Nope, for $1400 you get a 1.8GHZ P4. The 2.8GHZ would be $170 more.

  59. $130 > $50 by tepples · · Score: 0, Troll

    In would require a $130 USB2.0 TV tuner

    My PC's entry-level PCI video input card (ATI TV Wonder VE) cost me $50 new in box at Best Buy. Apple has failed to disprove the conventional wisdom that Macs are more expensive.

  60. methinks we're missing the point... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    I dont think the mac mini is targeted at those wanting the cheapest, most expandable pc they can get, and don't care what OS it runs.

    I think it's geared towards a couple niche markets: someone who's pissed off with windows to the point of junking their PC and replacing it with a mac (perhaps by the advice of a relative/friend who's sick of dealing with their windows problems for them). Also, for those wanting a net appliance (think cobalt qube). Lastly, for those curious about OS X and/or macs in general, but not ready to make the full switch to the platform. Training wheels for a real mac, could run side by side with their existing PC (KVM switch or control it over network).

    Apple's a premium brand and will be for the forseeable future. I can get just as drunk on miller high life as I can on newcastle, but I still prefer the newcastle and will pay the extra money for it. Can you dig it?

  61. Get back to work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! I was able to download the video! Why haven't you lazy-asses melted the site yet? What the hell do I pay you for?

    What? I don't pay them? They do this for FREE?!? Then where did my money.... ...

    Oh. Well, damn.

  62. How quiet is the Mac Mini? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    Does it have a cooling fan?

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:How quiet is the Mac Mini? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it has a fan that turns on/off at varying speeds according to internal temperature. It does run whisper quiet though.

    2. Re:How quiet is the Mac Mini? by jcr · · Score: 1

      It's actually a fairly large fan, which means it can run slowly and quietly.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  63. Now I didn't read the article... by aichpvee · · Score: 0
    The board itself is slightly smaller than Mini-ITX at about 160mm square by our estimations

    ...but do they not have a measuring tape?

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  64. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by naden · · Score: 1

    But what if you want to get composite video in and out of the machine? Or what if you have a wireless home network? Or what if you live in a geographic area where anything faster than 33.6K dial-up is not affordable, and you need a traditional v.92 modem? Would it be wise to depend on USB 2 based adapters for those?

    Composite video in: You just need a Firewire device like EyeTV.

    Composite video out: get one of the cheap DVI->Composite adaptors.

    Wireless home network: Get an Airport card installed. They are available as build to order.

    V92 modem: Built in. And all modems will negotiate with the ISP modems on a speed. So the 56K modems in the miniMac will automatically drop down to 33.6K as appropriate.

    So again what do u really need PCI for ? Between USB2 and Firewire and BTO options they seem to cover most things.

    --
    Funtage Factor: Purple
  65. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by burns210 · · Score: 1

    There is a builtin modem and internal apple-made adapters for 802.11X and bluetooth.

    The modem is in the base system, the wireless options are seperate (802.11x and bluetooth adapters are $125 total).

  66. Note from a linked article by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/editors/2005/01/mi niapplesandoranges/index.php I read this:

    """
    But it was only a matter of time before someone would argue, "It's still not price-competitive with the cheapest Dell." And within days we've got our first such columns and articles, all of which leave me scratching my head, wondering if these guys are as bad at comparing products when they shop for themselves as they apparently are when comparing products for their columns.
    """

    I agree. I'm a really recent switcher. I had a second hand mac kicking around years ago (and despised the OS - I ran Be on it), but bought an iBook laptop last Friday. It's my first mac and my first laptop. My justification was that it was cheap, runs unix, has full driver support, especially for wireless networking. I've held off for about two years waiting for a laptop that can deliver that for less than two grand Australian. That's a really compelling formula, and a far better geek computer than a PC.

    To get a happy unix experience on a PC laptop you either pay a lot more money or roll the dice on linux drivers and winmodems. Or you can try and run Windows and put up with the limitations of cygwin or the speed hit of vmware. Yuck.

    Not that it's always been this way. Until recently, Apples sucked. But OS X has become usable and the hardware has a better reputation than it used to - laptops in particular.

    If I were Apple I'd be a bit concerned at the powerbook line - the iBooks deliver so much for so little now the powerbooks don't look very attractive.

    --


    Believe with me, my saplings.
    1. Re:Note from a linked article by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

      I had a couple of other thoughts after posting:
      - Apple's recommended configurations have a ridiculously small amount of RAM. The default config for the top powermac has only 512MB. (For that sort of money you could build a far more powerful windows/linux workstation, too.) I pushed the laptop up to 768MB.
      - Now that half-life 2 has been and gone, it's a lot easier to justify putting your money into macintosh and rather than your PC (aaah the relief).

      And .. I noticed two edits..
      - %s/than a PC/than an equivalent PC/
      - %s/my first mac/my first new mac/

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
    2. Re:Note from a linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, for the extra money for a Powerbook you get multiple monitor capability, a better graphics chipset, a faster processor, more whiz-bang features with the 15 and 17 inchers, and the oh-so-coolness of the best damn looking laptop on the market. iBook is a close second though ;-). But yeah, for most people, the iBook is perfectly fine. Even though I love my 1.33 Ghz 12 inch Powerbook to death, I still tell my friends who are thinking about buying an Apple laptop to get an iBook unless money is not a concern.

    3. Re:Note from a linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. As a Powerbook - and desktop PC - owner, I wanted to beat the writer of that article about the head with the Mini-Mac. The author goes on about how silly people are when comparing cheap computers - then makes the exact same mistakes that he just criticised.

      Talk about missing the point. These types of computers are for the basics - email, word processing, web browsing. Maybe playing music and copying digital photos. Nothing more. So long as it does this, who cares? Nobody buys a $300 computer for games or digital video editing. It's particularly harsh when you expect the world for nothing. Perspective, please.

      Addressing the basic issues / misconceptions raised against the Dell in the article (and the user comments):

      * Antivirus - there's an excellent free antivirus available if you know where to look.
      * The cheapest DVI card I've seen is $19. Hardly pricy. If you require DVI, what are you doing with a $300 computer anyway?
      * Integrated video memory - will only use lots of video memory when you're playing games. It's possible to run Windows XP on a 10 year old 4MB graphics card. No hardware acceleration, obviously, but it works. If you're really worried about it, use your $19 DVI card.
      * XP Home doesn't support *domain authentication*. This means you can't make XP join a secured corporate network. You can still see other computers on local networks, home LANs are still plug & play.
      * No Firewire. Add a firewire card if you want, but I suspect you'll not be spending $2000 on a digicam, then plug it in to a $300 computer to edit the video.

    4. Re:Note from a linked article by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      The iBook is indeed a good deal, but there's still room for PowerBooks. I bought one last summer, and it was fully worth the premium. The screen alone makes it worth it to me. Toss in more ports, a significantly better video card, a larger hard drive, a PC card slot (which I'll probably never use) and the ability to upgrade the RAM to 2GB and you have a winner. The fact that the PowerBook comes with Airport and Bluetooth "for free" also reduces the premium and makes the PB more attractive.

      Still, I agree that they do seem to be lagging. I was kind of surprised that they didn't get speedbumped at MWSF.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:Note from a linked article by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      No Firewire. Add a firewire card if you want, but I suspect you'll not be spending $2000 on a digicam, then plug it in to a $300 computer to edit the video.

      Firewire has more use then just digital cameras. The iPod and iSight are both firewire capable devices from Apple (and while the iPod also supports USB2, it works best on a Mac when plugged into the Firewire port).

      For the iSight alone firewire is important to include on the Mac Mini for Apple, as it doesn't support USB at all, and Apple doesn't want to exclude any users from owning one (besides which, I could see a company buying some Mac Minis just for the cheap video conferencing capability they provide).

      Yaz.

    6. Re:Note from a linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""To get a happy unix experience on a PC laptop you either pay a lot more money or roll the dice on linux drivers and winmodems.""

      Or do what I did. Buy a refurbished Thinkpad. Save tons of cash and you know exactly how well Linux runs on it. Just google for linux and the model number for buying.

      I'm running Slackware on a 760EL (no GUI, mp3 server) and Debian Sid on a T20 (Gnome 2.8) and I have a T23 on the way.

    7. Re:Note from a linked article by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Still, I agree that they do seem to be lagging. I was kind of surprised that they didn't get speedbumped at MWSF.


      The Powerbooks just got EOL'd (along with the eMacs). Which means they're about to get bumped.

      The question is.... is this the big kahuna, the Powerbook G5? Or one more in-between step?

      It's not much longer to wait.... :)

    8. Re:Note from a linked article by anothergene · · Score: 1


      If I were Apple I'd be a bit concerned at the powerbook line - the iBooks deliver so much for so little now the powerbooks don't look very attractive.


      That will change this year. They are a bit long in the tooth so I would be expecting either a duel core G4 or possibly a G5 powerbook.

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
    9. Re:Note from a linked article by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I really hope it's the fabled PBG5. I'm going to get a Mac for my girl in a few months. Right now the plan is to get her a nice little iBook, but if a PBG5 becomes available, I might just trade up and let her have my PBG4.... I kind of doubt it, though. We just got G5 iMacs, and I imagine a G5 PowerBook would be a zillion times harder still.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    10. Re:Note from a linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, I agree that they do seem to be lagging. I was kind of surprised that they didn't get speedbumped at MWSF.

      Apple typically limits the announcements at their Expos. Sometimes, they even preannounce some products before the Expo to get them out of the way so that all the focus will be on the products they really want to get the buzz going. In the last Expo, those was iWork, Mac mini and iPod shuffle. Adding PowerBook and iBook upgrades will take away some attention from mini and shuffle. Also, staggering product releases keeps Apple in the news and in the people's mindshare longer.

      Rumors have it that PowerBooks and iBooks are getting ready for an upgrade, possibly just a speedbump, which is not worthy of an Expo announcement (unless Apple has nothing significant to announce such as during the Motorola's G4 debacle).

  67. Re:$130 $50 by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The goal in designing the Mini was never to make the cheapest possible machine, it was to make a low-cost Macintosh that Apple wouldn't have to be ashamed of.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  68. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    The little s-video/composite output dongle is $20 from apple's store.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  69. linux maybe? by colinleroy · · Score: 1

    It would have been a good idea to try to boot a recent linux on this thing. So we'd have known if it'll require some kernel work to make it run, or not.

    --
    blah
    1. Re:linux maybe? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      That is why we pay extra for Apple hardware, so that we can rip out the unix with a nice interface, and replace it with the crappy unix wannabe with the shitty interface.

      Chill out. Nobody is retarded enough to buy a Mac Mini to run Linux on. They are just trolling the Mac users.

      BTW, if our mentally handicapped friends out there ARE thinking about getting a Mac Mini to run Linux on, save yourself the trouble and just get a Via EPIA board and case and build your own. It'd be cheaper, smaller, and run x86 Linux out of the box.

    2. Re:linux maybe? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      BTW, if our mentally handicapped friends out there ARE thinking about getting a Mac Mini to run Linux on, save yourself the trouble and just get a Via EPIA board and case and build your own. It'd be cheaper, smaller, and run x86 Linux out of the box.


      Epias are alot slower than the Mini is. And they cost more or less the same. And they are about as big as well. In short: Mini is simply better than Epia is. Of course if you need x86, then it's a good choice. But I do not. And I do want to give OS X a try, and this seems like the best way to do it. And if I don't like it, I still have a kick-ass computer to install Linux on. I have been looking for such small computer to play around with. A win-win scenario.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:linux maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just install Yellow Dog Linux, based on Red Hat.

  70. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that new things tend to appear in the computing market, and without slots you're screwed.

    802.11 wasn't on the market when my Powerbook G3 shipped, but the majic of slots keeps the machine usable. Now, Apple would rather have people buy a whole new machine for the want of a $70 card -- which is exactly why they are nice profitable company with a 1% marketshare.

  71. Mac Mini Clustering? by XChilde · · Score: 1

    Why not compare Mac Mini to PowerMac G5 instead? Maybe one cluster of two or three cheap Mac Mini can outperform one PowerMac G5? If so, it would be a cheap solution for computing intensive tasks. Anybody wants to try it? Run Maya's distributed renderer on it?

    1. Re:Mac Mini Clustering? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      What would you use for interconnect? The Mini only has 100Mbit ethernet. While you could network them via the FireWire port, the fact that it only has one means you'd need to use some kind of switch which would add latency.

      On the other hand, they would probably be quite nice for distcc builds (support for which is built into XCode).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  72. RE: HD Size do you need fans? by furrywithwings · · Score: 1

    What's the price difference between buying it with the smallest hard-drive and buying another one later. It seemed to only be $99 to buy it with the bigger drive originally. 1.) Did anyone have luck with a bigger hard drive? 120gb or something 7200 rpm? Do you need cooling? 2.) Shame about no dolby digital output. It would have made a nice dvd player in the media center.

  73. Robust little beasts... by vspazv · · Score: 1

    Just had to point out its nearly impossible to accidentally kill a mac. Tried firing one up with a paperclip in the memory slot and it still worked. Had to run a USB death cable (USB cable spliced into a 19.5V 6A sony notebook adapter) to it before it would die... apple fixed it under warranty. As long as you don't snap anything off or leave non-apple stuff (RAM, hard drives) inside when shipping it they're pretty good about repairs.

    1. Re:Robust little beasts... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      As long as you don't snap anything off or leave non-apple stuff (RAM, hard drives) inside when shipping it they're pretty good about repairs.

      They didn't care that I left non-Apple RAM in my iBook when I shipped it in for repair several times.

  74. Bluetooth is not an add-on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    802.11g is. And I think it uses mini-PCI, just like Intel's Centrino.

    But the Bluetooth either comes on the motherboard or doesn't. There's no way to add it.

  75. Fram by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

    Do not EVER put a Fram oil filter into any car. They are the worst of the worst:

    http://minimopar.knizefamily.net/oilfilterstudy.ht ml

    Read the above break down. I have also personally had a Fram ruin one of my turbo chargers, and have a friend who actually got Fram to replace a motor because the check valve in one of their filters backed out and lodged itself in the oil galley.

    ft

    1. Re:Fram by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Do not EVER put a Fram oil filter into any car. They are the worst of the worst:

      It was just an example. Don't get your sphincter constricted.

    2. Re:Fram by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean it toward you. I should have put it in more of an FYI toward everyone format. Sorry bout that.

    3. Re:Fram by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean it toward you. I should have put it in more of an FYI toward everyone format. Sorry bout that.

      No problem. Sorry for being touchy. I also avoid Fram, preferring Purolator or Bosch.

    4. Re:Fram by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I prefer K&N filters, personally.

    5. Re:Fram by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      For air filters, K&N passes approximately 50% more particulate matter than conventional paper filters. If it was a race engine that I was planning to tear down on a regular basis, the slight extra horsepower from the K&N might be worth it, but not for street use. I knew someone who tested K&N filters as part of his automotive engineering job and he said "no way" when asked if he would use them in his car or motorcycle.

    6. Re:Fram by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Interesting...I've used K&N filters on my turbocharged engines for years and I've never had a problem. I put 40,000 on the last one and it was in tip top shape. This one has 25 and is also in great shape. Both were also chipped and otherwise modified for performance. Perhaps it's a YMMV thing...

    7. Re:Fram by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's a YMMV thing...

      It is. More particulates accelerates wear, but 50% more does not mean that the engine will turn to slag in 10,000 miles. It might mean that there's a bit more blow-by at 50K miles or that compression is down just a tad more. For me, I'd sooner put a larger conventional filter. But lots of people use and love K&N.

  76. Re:$130 $50 by Graymalkin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh snap! That took me five minutes dude, you've got to come up with a better argument.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  77. Don't forget the software! by ibentmywookie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody making comparisons seems to forget the fact that you get loads of *useful* software out of the box with *all* Macs.

    OS X Panther and iLife '05 allows you to do useful things with your machine out of the box. Not only that, but the software is *good* and it all works together.

    There is nothing comparable to a Mac in the PC world. Apple build the machine from the ground up, including the operating system and utilities. It all works nicely.

    I only realised that when I bought my iBook, so I don't expect people who haven't owned a Mac to understand.

    --
    -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
    1. Re:Don't forget the software! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only realised that when I bought my iBook, so I don't expect people who haven't owned a Mac to understand.

      A little bit of "elitist bastard syndrome"? Way to reinforce a stereotype.

    2. Re:Don't forget the software! by allanc · · Score: 1
      Hey, if you got a Mac, you'd become an elitist bastard too. Trust me, I've seen it happen many a time.

      (Me, I've been using them since I was four, so I started out as an elitist bastard) --AC

    3. Re:Don't forget the software! by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, a Windows guy saw I pushed F9 button and screamed, "God d*** it, I should have one." They won't understand untill they are eXPerienced.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    4. Re:Don't forget the software! by bbtom · · Score: 1

      On the software front, I think the Linux nerds win. OpenOffice, Kontact/Evolution, Firefox, Amarok and Gimp cover everything that I used my Mac for.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  78. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > In would require a $130 USB2.0 TV tuner

    Mac Tax at work. Similar Windows models cost $50.

  79. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Informative

    2.5 x 8.5 x 10.25

    2 x 6.5 x 6.5

    Same size my ass.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  80. Kevin Rose will be upgrading a Mac Mini on TSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He plans on buying one and upgrade the ram and HD on The Screen Savers next week. So check it out.

    Help me get a free mac mini
    http://www.freeminimacs.com/?r=13908694

  81. Digital out by LemonYellow · · Score: 1

    I know it's not so convenient as having digital out built in, but look at this:

    http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/firewave /index.php

    I'm happy that Apple have left the choice of whether to spend on digital audio out up to the buyer, rather than ramp the price of the mini.

  82. Macs are actually easy to work on generally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I know that Macs have a reputation for being black boxes were thou shalt not upgrade yourself type stuff, but it's actually not the case.

    The old PowerG3's were the easiest computers to work on. Hell of a lot easier then working on a Sun comptuer or a Dual CPU dell or even a white box PC that I built myself.

    I recently bought a ibook and the memory upgrade was VERY easy to use.

  83. -5 troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously this jackass hasn't even looked at a picture of a Mac Mini.

  84. Now what I wanne know.... by lucason · · Score: 1

    is can install any linux distros on this sucker....

    Anyone and ideas?

    1. Re:Now what I wanne know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yellow Dog.

      There is this little web site called "google" you might find useful...

    2. Re:Now what I wanne know.... by MoobY · · Score: 1

      Of course you can.

      --
      --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    3. Re:Now what I wanne know.... by Marcus+Aanerud · · Score: 1

      The Hammer says "Stop! Grammar time!" :)

  85. Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    Or your board is just 5 years old. Most boards these days have:

    -Onboard 10/100 Ethernet, sometimes gigabit, sometimes even two ethernet ports
    -Onboard sound
    -Onboard USB2.0 and Firewire if you want it
    -Onboard video if you want.

    An example is the low-end Asrock boards. I just picked one up for my daughter's computer upgrade before Christmas for $60 CDN. It has onboard sound, LAN and video. I paired it with a half GB of RAM and an Athlon 2400 CPU, and the total price tag was still under $250 CDN including tax. If I was building a whole system from scratch I could add a an 80 GB drive for under $100 CDN, a DVD burner for $80 CDN and a nice case for $60CDN and still be considerably less than a mini-mac ($625CDN plus taxes). Plus I'd have more memory, a larger hard drive, and a DVD burner. Bottom line: Macs are still more expensive than PCs, and probably always will be.

    1. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you really want to compare total costs you will need to add:

      - a copy of Windows [XP] (and you do buy yours legally, don't you ;))
      - if you're going for XP, add a copy of some AV software (though you can get some for free)
      - a worthy video editing and DVD authoring software (a.k.a. iMovie and iDVD on the Mac)
      - a music editing software (Garage Band on the Mac)

      If you add all of these, you're easily above the mini's price. Unless you opt for OSS alternatives, but these won't Just Work out of the box and will need some fiddling. Plus you won't get a $625CDN PC which comes even near the mini in terms of style, size and ease of use.

      But in the end it all comes down to preferences. The mini's not what you're looking for? Don't buy it. If I'd need a new desktop, I'd get one. But I just bought the 20'' iMac...

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    2. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      - a copy of Windows [XP] (and you do buy yours legally, don't you ;))

      Well, I use Fedora Core myself, but if you want to bundle XP OEM in there it's $118 CDN. That'll still be less than the mini-mac.

      - if you're going for XP, add a copy of some AV software (though you can get some for free)

      Most motherboards bundle some sort of AV software, and the free alternatives are getting better with time.

      - a worthy video editing and DVD authoring software (a.k.a. iMovie and iDVD on the Mac)

      But I don't edit videos or have any interest in doing so...

      - a music editing software (Garage Band on the Mac)

      See above comment regarding video editing..

      Plus you won't get a $625CDN PC which comes even near the mini in terms of style, size and ease of use.

      Size? No, the PC will be bigger. But that can also work against the Mini-mac as well. It's now small enough to be ripped off with the greatest of ease...
      Style? Dunno about that, my daughter's MicroATX case we got for $40 has stealthed drive bays and a cool glowing sphere on the front that doubles as a hard drive status light. She really likes it.
      And for ease of use, that's entirely in the eye of the beholder. I find getting things done that I need to do in OSX more bothersome than Fedora, but that's just me.

    3. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by Artega+VH · · Score: 1

      1. With fedora core does the bundled software with the motherboard work?

      Answer: Nope.

      2. Which free alternatives for av software currently are AS good as what is available for free with the macMini?

      Answer: Probably none. If you know of some I'd love to hear of them.

      3. How much value is gained from knowing that if you want to take up a new hobby you have some quality tools available to you?

      Answer: At least some, even if you personally aren't interested in DVD authoring, creating music, or editing movies. Perhaps you'll meet someone you want to do a favour for, perhaps someone in your family will want you to do so, perhaps you'd like to just have a bit of a play?

      4. The grandparent forgot to mention you'll need to buy and equivalent for xcode. Which would be some form of IDE so either Visual Studio, or something from borland? I'm fully aware you can just as easily use emacs/vi with gcc (or something similar in windows) but these aren't equivalent.

      5. So because all your appliances are getting smaller they are easier to rip off? I've got a nice big rear projection tv with anti theft protection available to you at the price of a new plasma.. deal? Perhaps smaller is nice, you can use the mini as a 2nd computer on your desk, or even in the loungeroom as a PVR.. its more flexible.. this adds value.

      6. The mini has more style. Your daughters glowing sphere doesn't. Okay.. thats a bit unfair but style is a subjective topic. I'd prefer the mini.

      7. You get things done more easily in fedora? What type of things? I like linux but it isn't ready for the desktop. OSX IS... you get the power user shortcuts that advanced users delight in. But you can do pretty much everything with the single button mouse most of us have. Can you do that in Fedora?

      Answer: Didn't think so...

      Result: Probably the mini isn't for you. You don't like OSX anyway and would prefer a big, ugly machine running a nice, but difficult to use, operating system.

      --
      groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
    4. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by cicadia · · Score: 1
      still be considerably less than a mini-mac ($625CDN plus taxes).

      Maybe CDN doesn't mean what I think it means when you use it, but with the Canadian dollar at it's current value, $500US is only $611CDN. Your $625 computer does not cost "considerably less" than a Mac Mini.

      --
      Living better through chemicals
    5. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you misunderstand. I meant the MAC cost $625 in Canadian dollars. If you can find a store that will actually sell it at today's exchange rate, great, but in my experience you always get screwed on exchange, so I went with the more conservative $625 estimate. Plus tax in BC would be $715 or thereabouts.

      The PC, on the other hand I mentioned would be $550 or less INCLUDING tax. Which is according to my math, "considerably less" than $715. And, as I also mentioned, has more hard drive space than the mac, more memory, and a DVD burner. Getting more for less.

    6. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by cicadia · · Score: 1
      Yes, perhaps I misunderstand. I didn't bother to add up your PC figures, and it looked like you were presenting $625 as a total for that machine, not the Mac.

      (though $625 still doesn't look out of line for a PC built from decent parts, even at netlink prices)

      --
      Living better through chemicals
    7. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. With fedora core does the bundled software with the motherboard work?

      Answer: Nope.


      Now you're deliberately misquoting me. The previous question had to do with Antivirus software being bundled with the mobo. Of course it won't work under Fedora Core, but it's not like it's really needed under Fedora Core either.

      How much value is gained from knowing that if you want to take up a new hobby you have some quality tools available to you?

      Answer: To me, absolutely none. If I am not interested in something, I won't use it. If I am interested in something, I will buy it to use it.
      If you look at something like this and go "Hm. Video editing. That might be cool. GarageBand. Sound editing. That might be useful to me" then this is possible added value. I looked at it and went "Hm. Don't own a video camera, and have no intention of buying one. I don't have a band, or much musical talent, and no time to bother anyway." Those bundled packages are a pointless waste for me. Would you buy a more expensive PC if the dealer was throwing in a MIG welder on the off chance you might like to learn to weld? And don't go off on how that's not software. There's a larger chance I'll use a MIG welder in the next few years than video editing software.

      . The grandparent forgot to mention you'll need to buy and equivalent for xcode

      Really? What the hell for? Am I developing software? Do I plan to develop software? Do 97% of people who buy a home computer develop software? NO. And in case you missed the part where I mentioned Fedora Core, I'll clue you in: It's got a huge amount of software development tools in there that I'll never use either.

      So because all your appliances are getting smaller they are easier to rip off?

      Yes. This should be self explanatory. If it's at a front desk at a company it's small enough to take if the secretary is distracted for a minute. It's smaller than a laptop and easier to conceal, and those go missing from companies all the time. If it's at home and someone busts in to your house, they want to take small, easily portable items. Cash and small electronics. The mini-mac is now in the "small electronics" category. A plasma TV still weighs over 100 pounds and does not fit the "small electronics" category.

      The mini has more style.

      Style is in the eye of the beholder. How else do you explain the AMC Gremlin ever seeing the light of day?

      You get things done more easily in fedora? What type of things?

      My job. Systems administraton. Reading and answering mail. Browsing the web. Writing documents and spreadsheets. Shell scripting. Works fine for me.

      I like linux but it isn't ready for the desktop.

      Funny. I've been using it as a desktop for 4 years. I wish someone would have told me it wasn't ready for the desktop. Oh wait...

      OSX IS... you get the power user shortcuts that advanced users delight in. But you can do pretty much everything with the single button mouse most of us have. Can you do that in Fedora?

      Do I want to? 80% of what I do doesn't even involve a mouse. And there's that lovely phrase that sets my teeth on edge. "Power user". After almost 20 years of doing this for a living, "power user" to me brings to mind the computer equivelant of a four year old with a chainsaw. Every person I've met who called themselves a "power user" managed in some way to cause untold mayhem and then expected me to bail them out.

    8. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by root2 · · Score: 1

      He means the price of the Mac Mini is $625 CDN. If you add up the costs he specced, it works out to $480 CDN ...

    9. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      >> So because all your appliances are getting smaller they are easier to rip off?

      Yes. If it's at home and someone busts in to your house, they want to take small, easily portable items. Cash and small electronics. The mini-mac is now in the "small electronics" category.


      So, you would not buy a mini because it's... mini? Because it's one of the first things the burglars that are regularely visiting you will steal? Uhm, you do have strange priorities then. ;)
      But anyway, there's even a Kensington hole in that thing.

      >> The mini has more style.

      Style is in the eye of the beholder.


      Yes, true. But I'd still not consider colourful == style.

      Systems administraton. Reading and answering mail. Browsing the web. Writing documents and spreadsheets. Shell scripting. Works fine for me.

      Guess you could do the same as easily in OSX, if not even more productive. I for one wouldn't want to live without Expose anymore, or Launchbar . But I guess it's just a matter of getting used to a certain system.

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    10. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't develop software, and so considering the cost of Xcode makes about as much sense as itemizing each background image that comes with the respective operating systems in question, in order to determine the value to the consumer when they're going to download nudie pictures or anime from the Internet and use that instead.

      But if they were developing software, I don't know, they might use
      one
      of the
      numereous options available to them for free.

      And as for video editing and music editing, I don't have any interest in either. And if my friend wanted me to do anything complicated involving either, I would probably not be qualified to do so anyway. Now if it were simple video editing, there are options.

      I doubt very much you would want to pay the premium of a bundled Mathematica with your computer in the off-chance you think you might like to take up mathematics. Nor a bundled Minitab in case you decide you missed your calling as a statistician. But point out that Macs are a poor price-performance competitor and some Mac user will itemize bundled software they don't really use, vacuous claims about the superiority of the manufactured parts, or introduce vague notions regarding aesthetics.

      Personally I can't see why anyone with any taste would use Aqua, or programs with ugly brushed metal themes. I don't really see why anyone with any taste would buy a bunch of white objects that will start off by not fitting in with their surroundings, and end up developing a dull tinge as they age. But it isn't really about aesthetics, it's about being superior to others by being in a higher-priced minority, so we can just forego any further discussion about style.

    11. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      But point out that Macs are a poor price-performance competitor and some Mac user will itemize bundled software they don't really use, vacuous claims about the superiority of the manufactured parts, or introduce vague notions regarding aesthetics.

      The main question is: what do you want to do with your computer? Personally, I use it for web browsing, email, listening to and, to a limited extend, producing music, watching movies/DVDs/TV on it, some programming, mainly script languages w/o compilation involved and finally some graphics editing. I can do all of that perfectly fine even on my fairly old 933 MHz iBook. And most of it Just Works out of the box, w/o the need to set anything up, worrying about incompatibilities or buying additional software packs. And for all of that I gladly wait two seconds longer for my apps to load.

      Just my 0.02 EUR regarding price/performance.

      And yes, I do find Macs aesthetically more pleasing than your average beige/white/black ATX box.

      If I'd badly need one of these 3+ GHz monsters to crunch some numbers I'd probably go for some Intel box as well, but the same as you don't need the bundled and well-working software, I don't need the additional MHz.

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    12. Re:Man, you're buying the wrong motherboards... by Psyborgue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First off: Fedora runs just dandy with *pretty much* any motherboard on the market today. Bundled software be damned, it's all crap anyway. Second off: Pretty much any *nix oss application you can think of compiles and installes under OSX with little or no modification. There are even automated tools to do this with such as Fink and darwinports. Often times it is even easier than that. Just simply download Gimp, Wings3d, Blender, or dozens of other oss .apps that work perfectly, installing them by just dragging to the desktop / hdd. (for those that don't already know, .app "files" are actually folders containing the main executable and other required data files. This is what makes it so easy to install (drag to HDD) and dis-install (drag to trash) software on a mac. Third off: There are Pros and cons to every operating system. I use my Powerbook 17" for image processing, colour critical work (properly calibrated 23" Cinema display HD), high end 3d, and lots of other stuff. I use my windows box for games (just about all it's good for). I use my Linux box as a raid fileserver, xmms, xvid encoding, and rendering. Fourth off: All three of these operating systems have different target audiences while all three try to cator (sometimes badly) to all three audiences. Linux takes patience, time, but allows extreme custimization and speed. Windows... well windows plays games well sometimes. OSX does everything but (many) games very well. Well that's my take on this for what it's worth.

  86. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by tigersha · · Score: 1

    One thing you cannot buy for the Mac Mini is dual head video. That is sadly a major showstopper for me.

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  87. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by dn15 · · Score: 1

    Agreed. What is the point of a PCMCIA slot when you already have 802.11g, Bluetooth, USB 2.0, FireWire 800 (400 on 12" models), gigabit ethernet (10/100 on 12" models), and a dedicated graphics chip with DVI/VGA out and dual-screen support? PCMCIA on a modern Mac laptop is pretty useless for most people.

  88. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by jcr · · Score: 1

    Well, for composite video out, Apple offers a $20 adapter that goes on the DVI port, and provides composite and S-Video outputs.

    For composite video *in*, you'll need one of the third-party USB or firewire video digitizers. Most of the cameras worth buying today are firewire anyway, so a special-purpose video-in port on the Mini wouldn't make any sense.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  89. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by danieleran · · Score: 1

    Yeah Steve tried to limit the Apple II to 3 slots (it had 8 i believe), and he was against expansion ports in the original Mac because it was supposed to be a cuisinart (not anything related to being hacker proof, don't know what ass you pulled that from).

    But Steve's NeXT had plenty of NuBus + slots in it, as do the plastic G3/G4s and the G5s, all of which were designed under Steve's watch. So its hard to fathom what your point is about Steve, slots and the mini.

    Its an appliance, it has USB and Firewire, and RAM/Wireless slots, why does it need a PCI or PC Card slot? What would you put in it, a card reader? .5% of the market is interested, and they should consider a laptop, iMac or a G5 instead.

  90. Hey, K.I.T.T...Yes, Michael? by itomato · · Score: 1

    I can hear it now..

    "Macintalk Pro English, Bruce."

    It's not K.I.T.T., but it's close enough.

  91. Building is more fun than working at Maccers by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure I would waste 7 hours finding my parts, coming home putting them together etc... but ITS FUN!!! and a learning experience.

    If you want to be a dull dumb boy and just BUY everything in this world, do it, become a robot consumer slave where in your view, NO ONE should have any skills apart from the job you do and be 100% a clueless idiot for anything else.

    Dude, people love to spend 5 hours preparing a super uber dinner too, sure they could work for 5 hrs, then go to a resteraunt and get the same, but why?? To support your macro economic consumer engine? So more people spend and buy , more money rotates and makes more taxes? Screw the banking money elite system, do it your self, reduce the govts taxes, become a better person for it.

    Simply 'outsourcing' everything might create more jobs, but you become a duller useless human being.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      So because it's fun to you, everyone should do it? Maybe I want to spend what little spare time I have doing something else. I'm immersed in technology for 8 hours a day, and that's quite enough. So I won't have that precious learning experience: so what? I can spend those hours doing something that doesn't have a store-bought alternative. Like helping out in my church, or tutoring neighborhood kids.
      This is called 'choice'. Most people choose to be clueless about building computers, because other things are more important to them. Guess what? They're right. If you want to build your own computers, go right ahead. But stop ranting that everyone should do it.

    2. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note, however, that knowing how to assemble a computer does not make you a more interesting human being. nor, unlike the cooking example, will it help woo women.

    3. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Actually, it really only takes about an hour to make an awesome dinner.

      For example, enchiladas.

      $9 at a restaurant. $18 for two people. $3 for drinks. $5 for appetizers, say chips with salsa. $26 for a nice dinner.

      For an hour's work, $2 in beef, $2 in tortillas, $1 of sour cream, $1 in various spices (though a bottle itself costs $3), $1 in soda, $1 in chips, $1 in salsa... $9 for materials, and assume your wages are $10 an hour, you've spent $19 for a $26 meal.

      Plus you get enough leftovers for lunch the next day. So really you've spent $19 for two meails, or about $52 worth.

      I don't think, however, building a PC is comparable. You're not saving anything, really, because you aren't building your own media jukebox software, or your own OS, or your photo management software. If you really wrote those then I'd compare that to making a meal. You'd spend maybe a month writing software, but you'd get so much experience and value that it would be worth it.

      But putting a PC together? That's the equivalent of making brownies from a box.

    4. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      I totally agree. It's almost as bad as when people tell me to ditch my 93 Camaro Z28 and get a new car. First, I like working on my car and I have no warranty to worry about. 2nd, with the $5,000 or less I could sell my car for, I'd still have to make payments to get a new Kia. Third, I prefer driving my current car over a dirt cheap Kia. Fourth, my car will still spank the hell out of most "new" cars on my #1 requirement, FUN.

      I will always build my own workstations and home servers. For relatives and friends, I either build them a PC because of all the little things I do to make it a beautiful thing or if I don't have the time, I recommend they go to a local shop with a good reputation. For business, I go with Dell. In a business environment, you only upgrade if the computer wasn't configured right in the first place (i.e., not enough memory for future software or a slow hard drive). If it has everything it will need to last four or five years, then you just replace the whole thing once its turn to be replaced is up. For the notebooks, we buy the idiot warranty so the next time someone decides to put a bottle of gatorade in their carrying case, I don't have to buy a new motherboard off Ebay and perform surgery to replace it.

      The one catch for me is that I started on the Macintosh and I would love to have this thing sitting at home to play with. When I stepped up to my mother's iBook running OS X, I felt like an idiot. I would just love to learn it inside and out and use it in lieu of Linux.

      -Lucas

    5. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Well I have done enough pc building that it is more of a chore or a routine. The glamour has worn off. What is so special about assembling a bunch of pre-fabricated stuff.

      There is no real brainwork going on there.
      Slap in the MB, pop in the processor, stick a few cards in, punch in the memory, connect a few cables and peripherals....Wow. .....dang that was hard.

      I will still build machines from time to time, but now that I can pick up Mac machines so cheaply and they just work. I am getting one for everone in my family and convincing my friends that the next time they upgrade they need to get a Mac mini.

    6. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      $2 for tortillas? What, you're using the gold plated kind? =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I bought a package of them. How much does 10 tortillas cost you? It was actually $1.29, but I rounded up.

    8. Re:Building is more fun than working at Maccers by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Oh, man! You're getting ripped off! =) Newegg has them for. . . .

      It probably varies by region, but a big bag of tortillas cost 89 cents where I live (a mostly latino neighborhood in Los Angeles).

      Whenever someone claims to have done something on slashdot, I can't help it; I read with a skeptical eye. The $2 price tag jumped out at me, but I don't doubt that you made enchiladas, or have the ability to cook (which is braggable).

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  92. Now I feel stupid... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

    I kept debating on spending the $75 on the 512MB upgrade. I placed my order on the day of the annoucement (FedEx says it'll be here Friday) and couldn't decide. I spent the $75 because we didn't know how hard the box would be to get into or if it would be sealed. I'm glad I only blew $75 on the RAM but I still feel like a dork. I *knew* this would happen... *sigh*

    --
    "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    1. Re:Now I feel stupid... by IdntUnknwn · · Score: 1

      If you had opened your Mac Mini, you would have voided your warrenty. Voiding your warrenty to save some money (less than $75 as that includes the cost of memory) is quite the gambit, especially when one considers how generous Apple's warrenty policies are. In many cases they will replace your broken product for free.

    2. Re:Now I feel stupid... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      No, opening the mini does NOT void the warranty.

    3. Re:Now I feel stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Think through your math again:
      512MB for the mini from www.crucial.com costs $80 plus shipping. You have to install the RAM yourself (no big deal, but work nonetheless), and you end up with the original Apple 256MB as a spare because there's only one DIMM slot. Sure, you can sell that on eBay for $25, but that's even more work.

      512MB installed by Apple cost you $75 -- less cash up front -- and you didn't waste any money or time on installation, there's no extra 256MB to throw away or sell, shipping's free, etc etc.

      So the cost of upgrading the RAM yourself is $85 (incl shipping) - $20 (eBay sale minus costs) = $65, and the cost for a seamless experience with preinstalled Apple RAM is $75. Isn't your time and convenience worth at least the $10 difference?

    4. Re:Now I feel stupid... by JakiChan · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the cost for 512 for the mini...but it's just PC2700 right? My chagrin was based on the idea of getting 1GB for that price and doing it myself.

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    5. Re:Now I feel stupid... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      75 isn't a raw deal. Its not the best price out there, but hey, at least you didnt spring for a gigabyte. That's where they suddenly hike the price up ridiculusly, presumably to keep people from just buying the cheapest mac and sticking an assload of RAM in it to make up for the differences. Bravo, Apple.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  93. An idea for EyeTV by Nailer · · Score: 1

    I wish they'd release a followup with the same, squarish dimensions as the mini, that'd sit under it.

  94. todays topoftheline = tommorows $500PC by cheekyboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If today you can edit on a uber $2000 mac, and its 'professional quality' then if in 18months time, the same spec mac comes out for $500, will you stupidly claim that its "cheap junk, good for web/email only" ????

    You want fast DV editing? plug a FIREWIRE 400gig drive into it, then you cannot claim its a hookey pooky cheapass mac.

    Todays $300 PC was $1000 in the year 2000, ie with the same specs if it was available. I could edit fine in the year 2000, though not as fast as a $5000 RAID scsi PC of today, its not as bad as a 1995 AVID system.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  95. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    No, its a USB2.0 version, the USB2.0 version of the Ati Wonder for PCs cost $99, but it doesnt come with the same quality software as the mac version(the mac one has better software)

  96. Heat? by silence535 · · Score: 1

    I guess 7200rpm drives will produce significantly more heat. This might be a problem.

    -silence

    --
    Dyslectics of the world, untie!
  97. or you could get the RAM from another shop by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Just FYI: I hope you do know that there are a bunch of online shops which will let you configure the extra RAM far cheaper than Apple's web site. You know, Apple's own online store isn't the alpha and the omega.

    So there you go. 1GB RAM without opening the case yourself, and without paying a ludicrious 500 bucks for it either.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:or you could get the RAM from another shop by Napoleon+Blownapart · · Score: 0

      Links please?

    2. Re:or you could get the RAM from another shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm

      kieraldinho@gmail.com

  98. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by m50d · · Score: 1

    The replies there also apply, but what about if you want internet via your mobile phone company? What about if in a couple of years you want to connect with broadband over power lines? What if someone invents something new?

    --
    I am trolling
  99. Extension Cords?? Embedded systems? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    This isn't a machine that's designed for battery power, though it's probably not bad, since it's pretty similar to some of their laptops. It's designed to be inexpensive and small for minimal impact on your desktop, with an AC power supply plugged into the wall. If you don't mind having robots plugged into the wall, you can go for bigger boxes with more CPU if you need them; if you don't need the fast CPU, the embedded systems market offers a lot more choices, many of which don't waste power on things like a high-end DVI video system, and which offer much more flexible choices of data I/O for controlling peripherals.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  100. Mac mini's power supply by SensiMillia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What concerns me is the MAC Mini Power supply. As a European my wall plugs give me 220V at 50Hz. I have some American contacts who will be travelling here shortly and can bring me a mac mini. Mac mini sells here at about EUR 500, which is about 25-30% more expensive than $500.

    Does anyone know whether
    - The power supply sold with the Mac Mini's in the US support 220V
    - The power cable is easily replacable with one that fits European wall outlets?

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=7 50 99 doesn't give me any info. (yet?)

    1. Re:Mac mini's power supply by payndz · · Score: 1
      AFAIK, Apple's power supplies support both 110 and 220V. I've taken my iBook to the States and used a cheap adapter (no voltage conversion, just 3-pin UK to 2-pin US) with no problems.

      Of course, it only struck me that I might have made an expensive mistake after plugging it in, but luck and sensible engineering were on my side. So if your new US Mac Mini goes BANG! and melts into a pool of bubbling slime at power-up, it's not my fault!

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    2. Re:Mac mini's power supply by Blackstealth · · Score: 1

      Debatable. Most (if not all) new macs sold in the USA and Japan are tweaked to only use a 100-120V supply. Machines sold in other regions support 100-240V.

      Looking at the US specs page for the mini it does state that it'll accept 100-240V but you might be best waiting until some US customers receive their machines and check the powersupply specs...

    3. Re:Mac mini's power supply by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth.. iBook and PowerBook power supplies work in both areas (US/UK - and I guess the Continent too) as they're switch-mode. I think the PSU on the Mac Mini will be the same too, since the PSU is separate from the machine. So even if you bought a machine and the supplied power brick was wrong, the machine is still the same.

    4. Re:Mac mini's power supply by hemanman · · Score: 1

      The Mac mini internals looks like it's a iBook without internal screen put in a different box.

      I bought an iBook last year, and the powersupply is a standard switchmode one, that can run on 110-220v, with a replaceable plug that connects to the rest of the powersupply adapter. That way, apple can manufacture one powersupply for all countries and just replace the plug module.

      So my guess will be that you can do this without any problems, you might be so lucky that the plug module from an iBook powersupply works, so that you just have to buy one of them as a spare part to have your system working like it was made for your country. :-)

      -H

    5. Re:Mac mini's power supply by Judogi · · Score: 1

      My guess would be it is auto-switching. The Cube, iBook, and Powerbooks all have external adapters silimar to the Mini and are auto-switching.

      Also, the specs page http://www.apple.com/macmini/specs.html lists the line voltage as 100-240v, 50-60Hz. I would assume that Apple isn't localizing the voltage like the eMac and iMac G5.

    6. Re:Mac mini's power supply by bhima · · Score: 1
      My Dual G5 PowerMac and 30" LCD display were both bought in the US and work fine here in the EU.

      I saved more money than the plane ticket cost

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    7. Re:Mac mini's power supply by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Of course, it only struck me that I might have made an expensive mistake after plugging it in, but luck and sensible engineering were on my side.

      Do note that the specs are written on the power brick itself ;-) That's the first place you should always look when plugging things into weird sockets.. *g*

    8. Re:Mac mini's power supply by 4angus · · Score: 1

      Having played with one today, direct from the states (i'm in Australia) I can tell you it has a multi voltage power supply, which uses the 3pin clover type cord - like the old G4 iMacs. So it should be very easy to move between countries.

    9. Re:Mac mini's power supply by ScottForbes · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to the technical specs, the Mac Mini accepts 110V to 240V -- and from the looks of this QuickTime VR view, the cable coming out of the power brick is a regular Mickey Mouse-style connector. You should be able to get by with a simple USA-to-Europe plug adapter, or you can invest 5 Euros and replace the cable entirely.

    10. Re:Mac mini's power supply by jxyama · · Score: 2, Informative

      iMac sold to the US household isn't dual voltage... (but the ones sold elsewhere are.) so beware.

    11. Re:Mac mini's power supply by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      It might be more expensive because the sales tax aren't included in the american price?

      --
      Martin
    12. Re:Mac mini's power supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And probably didn't pay the VAT, either. That's socialism for you; not even the socialists want it.

    13. Re:Mac mini's power supply by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      In the UK, excluding all sales taxes, it's still at least 10% more expensive.

    14. Re:Mac mini's power supply by Blackstealth · · Score: 1

      My Dual G5 PowerMac and 30" LCD display were both bought in the US and work fine here in the EU.

      According to a recent article in the WSJ Apple are getting wise to this and have recently started fitting different PSUs for different regions - it might have worked this time, but next time you try to save some money to prevent Apple from screwing you then your expensive purchase is likely to go bang as soon as you hook it up to the power...

      From the iMac G5 specs page (US):
      Line voltage: 100-120V AC or 100-240V AC, depending on country of purchase
      From the Power Mac specs page (US):
      Line voltage: 100-125V AC or 200-240V AC

      However any Apple product with an external power supply is likely to remain compatible with voltages between 100 and 240

  101. yes, 4200rpm, 2.5" notebook by a984 · · Score: 1

    as posted before

  102. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EZ-GO ePC-2???

  103. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not about being mini. It's about being first really cheap Mac. Heck, 300 GBP... it's same as PS2 or XBox at launch.

  104. Re:$130 $50 by Walkiry · · Score: 1

    >That took me five minutes dude, you've got to come up with a better argument.

    Really? I though he was talking about TV TURNERS and not just video capture. There're a few more features in the ATi

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  105. Not quite by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    1. The only way to get a better computer with than a Dell at the same 500$, is... to pirate Windows. Even an OEM or upgrade version of XP Pro or Windows 2000 Pro will put quite a dent in that 500$ budget.

    Build _two_ computers at that price? Well, gee, just two OEM Windows licenses will take up most of that money. So if you're trying to tell me that you can build computers for less than 100$ each, I'm damn interested to see what goes into them. I want one of those too.

    So the comparison is... what? "Stealing is cheaper than buying"? Well, gee, ain't that a surprise ;)

    And yeah, you could put Linux on them, but other than terminal nerds noone actually wants Linux on their computer. Joe Average will want Windows on their machine, one way or another, and Dell's price already includes that. (And Apple's includes MacOS/X.)

    2. Plus, since I _do_ build my own computers, I can tell you that over the years it's been just a pain in the butt. I've had my CPU overheating and crashing due to a bad heatsink. I've had data loss, repeatedly, due to hard drives overheating in a bad case. I've had such duds as buying two different hard drives in a row that were dead on arrival and had to be RMA-ed. Or like a third-party 9800 XT which mysteriously died for no obvious reason after a couple of months. Etc.

    Now for some people all this hassle counts as fun. You have to also realize that for most people it _isn't_. Anyone who isn't already into building their computers as a _hobby_, is very much better off paying to have it assembled by Dell.

    3. Noise. By and large this is a sub-case of 2: crap components designed by the cheapest unqualified monkeys. Or by the marketting department.

    Except in this case it's not a component that dies suddenly, it's one which works badly by design. And badly in an annoying way.

    About 99% of the OEM computer cases are designed by clueless idiots, with _zero_ clue of or consideration for airflow or noise. They put a lot of fans, but have them sucking at sheet metal and not achieving anything except to make that metal vibrate. Or in other creative ways not being able to move more than 5-10% of the fan's rated airflow. They're just designed to make a lot of noise and look funky, nothing more.

    (And a big "fuck you" goes to ThermalTake, while I'm at it. That's an elite among the elite, as retarded case design goes.)

    By comparison, Dell's cases (and IBM's and Apple's too, and a few others) are actually designed by engineers, not by graphics designers. They actually achieve better cooling with _far_ less noise.

    Etc.

    Just a thought: Maybe that's why people buy from Dell or Apple? 'Cause that price includes a usable OS, and a warranty, and it's all put together and tested by someone else?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  106. Heym but rebeka, your forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This computer doesn't even exist...

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=135238&cid=1 12 86233

  107. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Mac! That's the whole point! The revolutionary fact is that it is a _cheap_ Mac!

  108. Midi support by Judogi · · Score: 1

    Apparently the modem is a separate board, similar to the PowerMacs and iMacs. I wonder if Griffin will release a new version of the gPort to support Midi on the Mini.
    http://griffintechnology.com/products/gport/

    1. Re:Midi support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the Mac mini will not boot into Mac OS 9, the gPort is unlikely to work. I think you would need a USB-midi box.

    2. Re:Midi support by Judogi · · Score: 1

      The gPort supports OS X for midi no problem.

      http://www.griffintechnology.com/software/software _serial.html

  109. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >> Nothing revolutionary just asthetically pleasing.

    Oh, and how asthetically pleasing... *sigh*

    With x86 hardware you have to either fight with Windows or work at getting GNU/Linux/X to be your friend.

    Cheap(ish) + pretty OS that just works = Great combo!

    How many people out there are thinking:

    Wow, that looks like a great computer for Mum! No more spyware...
    Or:

    I can get one of those to do my work on, and use my $500 dell to play around with this "Linux" that I keep hearing about...
    Or:

    I'm going to get one, and damn it, I'm going to install more RAM myself!

    These things are going to sell.

  110. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the usage you seek is not that what this machine is intended for, it's a Mac for J.6pack and not for industrial design or that sort of work.
    Heck, you don't want to setup a CAD guy/girl with a $500 dell, so why do the same with a mini-mac?
    Is it so hard to get used to do things with the product that are designed for that purpose?
    Sure searching the limit can be fun but don't complain if it isn't perfect for it.

  111. Internal upgrade? You jest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem recording from a Mini DV camera to an external FireWire drive (120GB LaCie) on a much slower eMac. Surely this approach would make more sense than trying to upgrade the rather awkwardly sized (for speed) 2.5 inch disk?

  112. Mac Mini vs. Nanode by idlake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Compare the Mac Mini with Hoojum products. Coincidence? Engaged made made the same comparison.

    1. Re:Mac Mini vs. Nanode by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      The Cubit designs are (rimshot) cubic, whereas the mini... isn't?
      And next to the mini, the Cubit designs look cluttered and technofreaky.

    2. Re:Mac Mini vs. Nanode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe that he said Nanode if I look at the subject line. The most obvious criticism of which, other than it's still not in production, is that its Eden processor is going to get completely bitchslapped by the G4, which I suppose is a surprising turn of events for the G4 which up to this point has been getting bitchslapped by other $500 computing options.

      I also have no idea what technofreaky means, exactly. The Nanode looks a bit like a power supply you might find in an EE lab, sans knobs and with a "I want to look like I fell out of the Apple Store" paintjob.

    3. Re:Mac Mini vs. Nanode by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Compare the Mac Mini with Hoojum [hoojum.com] products. Coincidence? Engaged made made the same comparison

      The Hoojum looks more like the Mac Cube than the Mini looks like the Hoojum.

    4. Re:Mac Mini vs. Nanode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and with a "I want to look like I fell out of the Apple Store" paintjob.

      The arrogance of the Macintosh crowd is just incomparable. Now Mac fans come up with "anticipatory copying" of Apple ideas.

      As for the Eden getting "bitchslapped" by the Mac, that remains to be seen: the G4 is not a particularly fast chip either. Furthermore, the Nanode has hardware support for some multimedia functions.

    5. Re:Mac Mini vs. Nanode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hoojum Cubit is a cube. The Nanode is a flatter little thing with a slot-loading DVD, like the Mac Mini.

    6. Re:Mac Mini vs. Nanode by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini is a short Mac cube with its slot-loading DVD on the side instead of the top.

  113. All the posts by wondermog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... and no mention of the obligatory Beowulf Cluster! You could carry it around in a backback.

    --
    freeminimacs, just becau
  114. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by klaasvakie · · Score: 0, Troll

    While I agree that they are not the same size, I must observe that the power supply for the morex case is inside the case. I understand the one needs an external power brick for the Mac Mini.

    Could be wrong though, couldn't be bothered checking

    --
    # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
  115. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by pbf · · Score: 1

    I have a PowerBook with a PC-Card slot. I use it to grab photos from a compact-flash card that I put in an adaptor. This saves me from the crappy download software that came with the camera and it means one less cable to worry about. As a bonus this is way faster that USB 1.1 transfers.

    However if I did not have the PC-Card slot, everything would still work... So this is not stricktly required for me.

    A friend of mine needed a PC-Card slot for some data over GSM services, but again this is a limited use.

    --
    et les Shadoks pompaient...
  116. Re: HD Size do you need fans? by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I ripped the 4200 RPM 60 GB HD out
    of my 15" PowerBook about 1 year ago, and
    replaced it with a 7200 RPM 60 GB Hitachi
    (HK7K series). It was pretty expensive
    (nearly $200 USD), but the computer has
    been quite a bit more responsive. And BTW,
    neither the battery power drain nor the
    heat have been appreciably affected -- the
    same power saving technology works with the
    HK7K disk.

    From other posts here, there is a large, slow
    moving (quiet) fan in the Mini. Use of an
    adapter to put a 10K RPM 3.5 inch disk in
    should not require a new fan - it may run more
    frequently and at a somewhat higher speed (more
    noise). I might be somewhat more concerned
    about the output of the power brick, as well
    as any internal terminal for supplying the
    power a 3.5 inch disk would require. Perhaps
    just another mod to make, while we're at it?

    (Damn, I want one of these Mac Minis ...)

  117. Wattage by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...a higher wattage CPU...

    We're om /. here so why do you use wattage? Of course you mean power consumption. To any half clued techie, Wattage sounds just as silly as Ampereage, Faradage, Ohmage and Voltage. (current, capacitance, resistance and potential)

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Wattage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're om /. here so why do you use wattage? Of course you mean power consumption. To any half clued techie, Wattage sounds just as silly as Ampereage, Faradage, Ohmage and Voltage. (current, capacitance, resistance and potential)

      Because Dr. WATTSON, if you'll check your dictionary, it's a proper word...DOH!

    2. Re:Wattage by spleck · · Score: 1

      If you're interested, wattage is power consumption in the specific units of watts. Just as voltage is a measure of potential in volts, and amperage is current in amps. Power, potential, and current are, by themselves, unit-less. Units are useful in some instances, for example temperature. If it is 0 degrees Celsius, that doesn't imply there is no temperature.

      It's fairly common to introduce and accept new words into the language. Unfortunately, you're probably years too late to keep "wattage" out.

      Yes, ampereage does sound silly.

    3. Re:Wattage by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We're om /. here so why do you use wattage? Of course you mean power consumption.

      Because CPU manufacturers specify the power consumption and thermal load of their CPUs as "wattage." Take a look at this Intel document and you will see that the term I used was a correct and accepted one.

      To any half clued techie, Wattage sounds just as silly as Ampereage, Faradage, Ohmage and Voltage. (current, capacitance, resistance and potential)

      Well, perhaps if I was "half clued techie" I would think it sounded silly. But since I've got some real engineering experience, I recognize that the term is correct.

    4. Re:Wattage by Bucket+Truck · · Score: 1

      Personally I think Ohmage sounds pretty cool... Now if we can just find somewhere to use it. "Tech support? My Windows ohmage is low. Can you send me some more?"

      --
      Tongue: A variety of meat, rarely served because it crosses the line between a cut of beef and a piece of dead cow.
  118. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    It's not revolutionary, but it IS a big deal. The price for an OS X-capable computer has just been halved. And Mac users no longer stuck with the choice between an all-in-one or a workstation-class machine.

  119. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mac mini is to pc's what the ipod was to mp3 players?

    Wow. I think an apple sale sales exec just creamed himself.

  120. Tools of the trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When disecting any product from apple you must use approprieate tools.

    your toolkit must contain a range of sizes of hammer ranging from a tack hammer up to a huge sledge hammer.

    The tack hammer is for show but the real job gets done with the sledge hammer!

  121. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by allanc · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are wrong. The Morex case doesn't have an internal power supply. It has an internal DC-DC power supply, which means that it has an external wall-wart to convert AC to DC.

  122. optical connectors raise prices by m0llusk · · Score: 1
    The submitter states:
    ... includes Ethernet, Modem, DVI/VGA, 2 x USB, Firewire and Audio connectors (sadly not optical).

    This seems like the kind of basic mistake that geeks make. Optical connectors cost more and putting two kinds of connectors which is common when optical are made available costs even more than that and takes up additional space. This unit is not intended to be a machine to please extreme hardware enthusiasts, but a cheap machine that ordinary folks can use. Most people have little if any equipment with optical connectors and would much rather save some money to get a computer that mostly suits their needs. Putting optical connectors on this product would without question be a mistake, raise the cost, and foul the marketing.

    1. Re:optical connectors raise prices by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      This seems like the kind of basic mistake that geeks make. Optical connectors cost more and putting two kinds of connectors which is common when optical are made available costs even more than that and takes up additional space. This unit is not intended to be a machine to please extreme hardware enthusiasts, but a cheap machine that ordinary folks can use. Most people have little if any equipment with optical connectors and would much rather save some money to get a computer that mostly suits their needs. Putting optical connectors on this product would without question be a mistake, raise the cost, and foul the marketing

      I'm not sure sure that this is the case -- for a good counter-example, take a look at the Apple Airport Express, which has a combined analogue/optical port on it, and which costs $129 US.

      I'm somewhat suprised that Apple didn't use the same system on the Mac Mini. Use the dual 3mm analogue/mini-Toslink port, and provide both.

      Then again, anyone who does desire optical output could always simply use the Airport Express. Perhaps Apple will open up an API for streaming audio to the Express precisely for this purpose.

      Yaz.

    2. Re:optical connectors raise prices by m0llusk · · Score: 1
      for a good counter-example, take a look at the Apple Airport Express, which has a combined analogue/optical port on it, and which costs $129 US.

      The Apple Airport Express is a dedicated device with many of the components required for a general use computer not present. Bump its price up a few bucks for one of the few features there and it probably won't matter to the overall unit. Getting a design like the Mini right is all about not including things, like the screen for example that before this was announced people were saying Apple could not economically unbundle. There are without doubt many things like this that could be added to the Mini. More connectors, more memory, more wireless, more bundled software and on and on. But then it would not be a Mini, would it?

      Perhaps Apple will open up an API for streaming audio to the Express precisely for this purpose.

      Apple audio streaming software has been open sourced for a long time. Download QuickTime Streaming Server and you should have all the code you might want to do this.

    3. Re:optical connectors raise prices by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      The Apple Airport Express is a dedicated device with many of the components required for a general use computer not present.

      Of course it is -- that's hardly the point. The discussion here is merely about the availability of an optical port. Apple already has them on an inexpensive consumer device, and as such I can't see that there would be any significant extra cost to add this to the mini (unless, of course, as I surmised previously that Apple is going to target the Airport Express to mini users for this sort of purpose).

      More connectors, more memory, more wireless, more bundled software and on and on. But then it would not be a Mini, would it?

      Except that in this case, there wouldn't be an extra port at all. It would be the same physical port as the existing audio out connector, just like on the AirPort Express (in case you haven't seen one, and I haven't been sufficiently clear on this, the AirPort Express doesn't have separate ports for the analogue and optical output, but uses one port which can take either a 3mm stereo male connector, or a mini-Toslink connector).

      Apple audio streaming software has been open sourced for a long time. Download QuickTime Streaming Server and you should have all the code you might want to do this.

      Two problems with your response:

      1. the QuickTime Streaming Server is not available for download. It's commercial software. The Darwin Streaming Server, however, is. Minor errata, just wanted to make sure tihs was clear to anyone else reading this thread.
      2. So far as I can discern, neither the QuickTime Streaming Server nor the Darwin Streaming Server support the Remote Audio Output Protocol used for the AirPort Express with AirTunes (aka the AirTunes Protocol). Indeed, other than to say that it is supported by iTunes, I can't find any documentation on the Apple Developer Connection website detailing the RAOP. AFAIK, it's still a closed protocol which is supported by nothing other than iTunes.

        (I do, in fact, have the Darwin Streaming Server locally, but don't have it installed at this time to test this with).

      What I'm sitting here daydreaming about is perhaps support for RAOP in QuickTime 7, or perhaps in Tiger as a part of its audio support. Having an AirPort Express with AirTunes, however, there appears to be a streaming/buffering induced delay, which could make it difficult to use this for anything which requires A/V synchronization (unless they come out with a new AirPort Express which can handle audio and video streaming support).

      Personally, I see the Mac mini as virtually perfect. I am suprised that they didn't continue their dual-use port like on the AirPort Express -- but perhaps this isn't just to keep costs down, but because Apple either expects users with this need to use AirTunes for optical connections, use an external USB-based audio device which has an optical port, or has something else up their sleeves for connecting the Mac mini to home media devices.

      Yaz.

  123. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by klaasvakie · · Score: 1

    The Morex case doesn't have an internal power supply. It has an internal DC-DC power supply, which means that it has an external wall-wart to convert AC to DC.

    I stand corrected.

    --
    # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
  124. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Connect to the internet through your mobile phone, huh? THE MAC MINI IS A DESKTOP.

    Dipshit.

    2. USB? Firewire?

  125. Dang by St.Anne · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to disassemble the web site to get the video out. I better leave the upgrading to teenagers.

  126. Re:$130 $50 by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're not trying to prove that Macs are cheaper than shitty PCs - they simply released a Mac that is cheaper than other Macs.

    From the outset it was clear that you could build/buy a PC for less money than a Mac mini, but that's just not the point.

    It's a Mac, in a box the size of a few CD cases, with a full OS, CD burning, DVD playing, wireless etc.

  127. Screws? by SpinJaunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just outta curiousity, was there *any* left over screws?

    Dosen't matter how many things I've taken apart, there always seems to be atleast one extra screw!

    --
    /. is good for you.
    1. Re:Screws? by EuphoricaL · · Score: 1

      I replaced my ibook disk the other day, had 3 spare screws, can't for the life of me figure out where they came from...

  128. BS by Sebhelyesfarku · · Score: 1

    when I put a 7200rpm 3.5" external hd to my PowerBook it got much faster even on OS 9. 4200rpm 2.5" drives are freakin slow.

  129. OS X is bloated by Sebhelyesfarku · · Score: 0, Troll

    especially for the underpowered mini

    1. Re:OS X is bloated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever *used* OS X? Seemed snappy enough on my old 800MHz G3 iBook. If you keep saying "underpowered mini" you may end up believing the garbage you're talking, and that would be a shame.

    2. Re:OS X is bloated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear. OS X is bloated but Mandrake isn't?? Give me a fucking break. Yet another fool who's never used OS X.

  130. No Gigabit Ethernet by iamthemoog · · Score: 1

    No gigabit ethernet, so according to this, the mini won't be able to function as a Logic processing node.

    --
    No Norm, those are your safety glasses; I'll wear my own thanks...
    1. Re:No Gigabit Ethernet by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      It should be absolutely fine as a logic processing node - Firewire networking is pretty much as fast as Gigabit ethernet when you take into account that you can do full duplex with firewire and only half duplex with gigabit.

  131. Mac in Third world countries by ravee · · Score: 1

    It is a shame that the mac's use is less prevalent in third world countries. For example, in the city I live, there is not even ONE mac reseller that I know of. No ads in newspapers and magazines to be seen at all.
    Infact if the mac mini is introduced in third world countries at the price stated (after taxes) , Apple can really make a dent in the market share of Microsoft and break their monopoly.

    Ravee
    --
    http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
    1. Re:Mac in Third world countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If India, Egypt, the UAE and Sarawak, Malaysia still count as Third World countries I have found Apple dealers there.

      India - major national dealer is/was "Wipro" ( they are very good, will import software products to order and do hardware repairs and upgrades ).

      Malaysia - various small Apple dealers - seek out Media and Publishing ghettos.

      Egypt and especially the United Arab Emirates ( Dubai ) have Apple Dealers.

      Refer to the following page for Apple's asian websites and where to buy advice for 20 countries:

      http://www.asia.apple.com/buy/

      Refer to the following page for Apple's Latin American sites and where to buy advice for 31 countries in English:

      http://latam.apple.com/resellers/lae/

      Most ( 30 or more ) European countries have their own sites accessible directly from the menu at the bottom of the front page of apple.com, good luck!

    2. Re:Mac in Third world countries by ravee · · Score: 1

      What I meant was, unlike microsoft, apple is not proactive in marketing its computers and softwares in the third world countries as in the US and canada. For example, apple sells their computers to schools in the USA at a discount rate so that more and more schools favour their computer over a PC running windows - which does'nt happen in other countries.

      But with the advent of the Mini (at a comparative price w.r.t a PC), and with some real push in the marketing area (where apple is weak or lagging behind), I believe we can see exciting times ahead.

      ravee
      --
      http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com
      http:/ /thoughts2005.blogspot.com

      --
      Linux Help
      for all things on Linux
  132. PC RAM by mstefanus · · Score: 1

    Speaking of RAM, does anyone know whether I can upgrade the memory using standar PC DDR memory?

    1. Re:PC RAM by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

      There hasn't been a difference between "PC RAM" and "Mac RAM" for decades now. The Mac Mini takes standard PC2700 333MHz DDR SRAM.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  133. hard drives by a984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I will second the post claiming major perceivable changes when going from 4200 to 7200rpm. OSX is heavily disk dependent -- for example most menu operation require going to the disk and reading some file or worse like enumerating some files, or even worse like running some code that needs to read in from the disk. Think contextual menus for example. History menu in Safari. Sick of it already?

    4200 is barely acceptable.

    some considerations when upgrading hard drives.

    Power - little change when going from 4200 to 7200, within 10% most. No problem here.

    Latency - typically 7ms, 5.5ms amd 4.2 for 4200/5400/7200 rpm respectively. 7200 is almost twice as good as 4200.

    Seek time - 12ms for 4200/5400, 10ms for the lone 7200 available. Nice but not earth shattering.

    Buffers - 8GB in better drives. Unrelated to rpm.

    Noise - slower is better. 7200RPM is roughly 2 time louder.

    Reliability - who knows, specs are unhelpful here.

    1. Re:hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With an 8GB buffer it had better be quiet.

    2. Re:hard drives by gabe · · Score: 1

      I have a 7200rpm drive in my PowerBook G4 (1GHz, 1GB RAM). I still notice a lag when I open the bookmarks menu in Safari. Actually, now that I tried menus in other apps, there's a slight lag in pretty much every menu. My guess is it's not the HDD causing that.

      As for sound, I notice the fans more, but the HDD is not noisy enough to bother me.

      --
      Gabriel Ricard
    3. Re:hard drives by kimota · · Score: 1

      I've upgraded from a 4200 to a 5400 RPM drive on a laptop and noticed a serious speedup, and from a 5400 to a 7200 on an aging iMac, and it almost felt like I'd dropped in a CPU upgrade.

      But you don't address the issue of heat. Any idea of how much extra heat a 7200 RPM drive adds, and any idea whether the mini, which apparently lacks a fan, can dissipate that heat effectively? That'd be my main concern.

      --Kimota!

      --
      Who moderates the meta-moderators?
    4. Re:hard drives by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      I've had a number of [ahem] discussions with Mac users about this. The nature of my work requires me to use the occasional Mac (graphic design), and the one thing that bugs me more than anything else is the tiny, almost inperceptible LAG when clicking on menu items or bringing up context menus. It's so small that you probably wouldn't notice it, that is until you work on a Wintel box where everything just snaps.

    5. Re:hard drives by a984 · · Score: 1

      Heat is directly related to power consumed, and as i said that consumption is within 10% across available rpm range.

    6. Re:hard drives by valkraider · · Score: 1

      I have a PowerBook 1.5 ghz with OSX 10.3.7 sitting next to a Dell 2Ghz Pentium 4 with WinXPPro SP2. Both machines have 1GB Ram, the Mac has a 5400Rpm drive, and the PC a 7200.

      I have no idea what "lag" you are referring to, they both work the same for me. That is AFTER I turn off the animation effects in WinXP (those induce hella lag).

      I am seriously wanting to experiment here, if you can pick where you notice it the most it would be helpful.

    7. Re:hard drives by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      That is AFTER I turn off the animation effects in WinXP (those induce hella lag).

      Definately! XP in general is laggy, but the thing with Windows is, it's either all or nothing. That is, when you click on something, it either comes up right away, or you're sitting there like an idiot waiting for "something" to finish.

      I am seriously wanting to experiment here, if you can pick where you notice it the most it would be helpful.

      I would actually very much appreciate it. The system in question was a G4, though I don't know the processor speed. It's a slightly older system, however, so probably 733 Mhz. It had about a gig of RAM, but since most of the work involved large images in Photoshop, it still probably ended up swapping to disk.

      The primary use was web design. To simulate it, load up Fetch, Photoshop with a (let's say) 2 MB image, and Safari on a page with Flash. Do a little of whatever in each of the programs, then pick a program with context menus and right-click (or control-click for one-button mice).

      As the moment of button release, the menu should pop up. Or even easier, go to the top bar and open a menu item. Again, this should be instant, but all the Macs I've used have a slight delay--it's not enough to cry home about, but it hasn't helped to sell the Mac to me.

      I'll have to try one of the new mini's out and give Apple another shot. Perhaps the processor wasn't up to snuff, or the systems I've used have been underpowered in some regard. If the new mini does indeed kick as much butt as all the fanatics say, that would be a hell of a price-point.

      Just a quick Googling reveals I'm not the only person who's noticed this problem. It's funny, because the way he describes it is almost exactly the way I feel: "It's a hard phenomena to describe objectively--all I can say for sure is that when I go back to using my home PC or my work PC, the mouse movement is crisp, reliable and predictable."

      It's so subtle that I usually just suck it up, but it is aggrivating when you're not used to it.

    8. Re:hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you probably wouldn't notice it, that is until you work on a Wintel box where everything just snaps.


      Funniest. Post. Ever.

      Seriously, which Wintel box have you been working on?
  134. BS: You can price one here $700. Mac is cheaper by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I call BS...

    You can use this link to price out that enclosure, when configured the same with 1.2Ghz proc, winXp home, 40G drive, CD-RW/DVD drive + 35 for assembly. Total cost for comparable PC mini is then over $700 and the mac has much more included SW, better OS, and is still a nicer HW package for $200 less.

    http://www.logicsupply.com/product_info.php/cPat h/ 29/products_id/114

  135. Mac Mini vs. Airport Extreme/Express? by GeeDubber · · Score: 1

    did anyone else read smash's 'Mac Mini vs. Airport Extreme/Express?' article. is it just me or was that article really stupid?

  136. Not much of a dissection. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    One movies show the use of a putty knife to open the case, then some pics of the naked circuit board. I would like some real dissection pics of how it all fits together. Also I would like to see things like the CPU cooler and fan...

    1. Re:Not much of a dissection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then buy one, or wait 5.3 minutes after launch when someone will have posted details.

  137. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    It's a computer the size of a smallish CD case that you can take home, plug in, turn on, and be surfing the web two minutes later, with no fear of viruses or spyware. It's a half-toaster computer that Just Works. That's revolutionary to me.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  138. Another format for the video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone want to convert it to MPEG-2 or something? I hate quick time.

  139. reality mimics art by Chriscypher · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow!
    I didn't know Cartman was a Mac-version naming snob!
    He even posts on slashdot!

    .

    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
  140. Heresy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These boxes were never meant to be opened!

  141. Strawman, strawman, strawman by smcdow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You're not getting it.

    I'm no Mac fanboy; I've got plenty of x86 machines running Linux and XP (it does have its uses) all over the place at work and at home. But, the very next machine on my list to buy is the Mac Mini. Seems to me that the whole point of the Mac Mini (and indeed of all Macs in general) is this:

    1. You bring it home.
    2. You turn it on.
    3. It just fucking works.

    Constrast with the proceedure for x86 machines:

    1. You bring it home.
    2. You install all your expansion cards.
    3. You install the operating system. We all do that ourselves, right?
    4. You configure the operating system for the devices you have installed
    5. You shut down and rearrange the expansion devices and pray that it clears up interrupt conflicts.
    6. Probably go to step 4. Eventually fall out of this loop.
    7. Tweek. Repeat.
    8. Futz. Repeat.

    I've wasted many, many hours of my precious life installing, configuring, tweeking, twiddling, rearranging, futzing, prodding, farting around with, etc., all these x86 machines. I want at least one computer that I don't have to dick with. Here's my checklist for justifying my buying one:

    1. Runs Quicken? Check.
    2. Runs TurboTax? Check.
    3. Mozilla products? Check.
    4. Runs MS Office (sorry, gotta use it)? Check.
    5. Runs Photoshop? Check.
    6. Runs iTunes? Check.
    7. Unix-based? Check. X11? Check. ('tho I'm no big fan of BSD-ish installations, I'll get used to it).
    8. Upgradable? Who gives a shit?

    What this means for me is that I can dump two machines that I have at home (one Linux, one XP), and replace it with a smaller, no-muss-no-fuss, machine.

    Geeze, how can I resist?

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    1. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interrupt conflicts? What is this, 1991?

    2. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strawman accusations coming from someone listing interrupt conflicts on their list of why not to use x86? Time to fast forward a few years man. If you'd stop tweaking and futzing for about a day or so I'd put money on your x86 machine working just fine. If not, well, i'm sorry, buy quality components next time.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by monopole · · Score: 2, Informative

      nice but the trick is: (and I have done this)
      1.Get a VIA EPIA mini-ITX (or shortly a nano)
      2.Put it in a Cubid case
      3.Boot off of SLAX or Knoppix
      It just works!
      (in linux!)
      The real competition for the mini are the mini or nano ITX boxen, they have everything but wireless integrated (if you need wireless just stuff in a USB key style adapter) with a full set of drivers on a single disk for windows and full kernel support for linux. and they are a lot cheaper

    4. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by timothy · · Score: 1

      I'm not actually arguing with your basic point, but one data point: for me, the "messing about" stage has gotten much smaller / shorter thanks to easy-to-install Linux distros.

      At the moment, I'm using ProMepis beta3; flash works, OO.org is not actually MS Office, but in my limited use of Office-created documents, words great, GIMP 2.2 is very sweet (IMO, YMMV). I won't try to convince you about individual pieces of software; we all have deal-breakers in life.

      Installing Mepis (and Knoppix, and any similar distro) on typical x86 hardware is just about painless, and gives you buckets of apps built in and well-integrated. I don't visit Windows machines very often, but it certainly seems like a nicer desktop than Windows machines I've used. Aesthetics are individual, of course; I have OS 1X 10.3 on my iBook, and I prefer this (Mepis, mini-ITX) machine as an all-day envirment.

      Anyhow --

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    5. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Um Ok. With a modern pre built and installed x86 machine the procedure is:

      1. You bring it home.
      2. You turn it on. (ok so i'll skip the you unpack and plug it in stage)
      3. It just fucking works.

      The fact that you are building and installing your computer is a matter of CHOICE. You want the cheap prices you want the absolute component choice, you want to run a different OS etc. These are choices and you don't have to do it. Most people by a computer which is prebuilt.
      I usually build my own computer, but with my last upgrade I purchased a build to spec computer and had it shipped assembled. Sure I still swapped in my extra hardware and installed the OS myself, but that was my choice. I did however choose to save the time spent installing the cpu, motherboard and basic component seeing as the cost of the system built was the same as the cost of the parts.
      If you are a user who wants that level of choice and is going to be irritated by the lack of such in the Mac Mini I would suggest avoiding it. If you understand exactly what you are getting and can accept the components Apple put in you are likely to enjoy it more.
      After the "oh wow it just works" factor goes away pretty quick, however the "i can't run this game for shit on a Radeon 9200" factor may set in somewhat later and have you complaining.
      The Mac Mini is not the end all and be all of computers, it is a nice closed box which is the cheapest way to run OSX. It also has the lowest grade hardware of any Mac (well ok so slightly faster than the eMac if you get the 1.42GHz. I intend on picking one up, but I sure don't intend on running a Doom 3 port on it if one ever comes out.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    6. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeze, how can I resist?

      Transfer all your money to my bank account. Trust me. When you have no money, you won't give in to the temptation.

    7. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that the competition for the Mac Mini is based on perforamnce, technical specifications or even appearance?

      The important things to the average Mac Mini buyer (real ones, not those of you who start by saying "I'd buy one if..." but would never buy one anyways) are, in no particular order:

      1. Mac OS X
      2. iLife
      3. Can run the equivalent of MS Office at an acceptable speed
      4. Can surf the web at an acceptable speed
      5. Can read e-mail at an acceptable speed
      6. Price relative to other Macs

      The non-techies won't care about the specs. They just want the Mini Mac because it's a Mac they can afford.

      The techies and switchers know that a Mac Mini is what it is -- a cheap Mac. They just want it as a second computer, or as a "foot in the door" to help them decide on whether they should get a REAL Mac.

      Yes, it's quite possible that you can get a faster and spankier PC for less money, but guess what? That PC still isn't going to be a Mac.

      And that's all that the real Mac Mini buyers care about.

    8. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by fermion · · Score: 1
      You forget
      1. find activation code
      2. type in 1,0000 numbers exactly into little boxes
      3. try to connect to the internet to activate your computer
      4. spend an hour fucking with the IP configuration trying to get it to work
      5. by the time you get activated, and get the upgrade, your machined in already owned
      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    9. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by Golias · · Score: 1

      The average time it takes to download the "Critical" packages for Windows XP Professional on a typical DSL or Cable connection is currently longer than the average time it takes for hackers to own a box which becomes exposed to the Internet.

      That means that, unless you have a rock-solid firewall already up and running on a separate box, you have basically no chance of connecting to the Internet with a new XP computer installation without being "pwnx0r3d" on the very first day.

      How the fuck does anybody tolerate this shit?

      My dad recently called me (again) this week about his (yet more) hardware configuration problems on his home-office PC. He's not trying to do anything fancy... Just basic word processing, finances, photo management, and a few small media files, yet I hear from him about twice a month about the computer causing some bullshit problem which would never happen on a Macintosh.

      I told him I know of a $499 solution to his problems.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      True - provided you don't have a clue what you are doing and expose your machine bare to a DSL or cable connection without a firewall in the way. Service pack 2 for XP does help with this. Also some of our local ISPs have been bundling firewalls with the service or offering to firewall the connection.
      Certainly everyone who asks me about DSL or Cable connections gets the lecture and recommendation to install a firewall. I don't know many people who don't have a hardware firewall in place actually.
      If someone just wants to do word processing, basic accounting, web browsing. I would probably recommend a Mac. Mac's however due have their share of problems just as any other OS. Also most non-savvy Mac users I have seen do run their computers under the administrator account which means if someone can get in they will be able to play.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    11. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Bah.

      Even if the cost were the same, a mini-ITX in a small case is still no real competitor to the Mac mini. For one thing I'll bet you it will be more expensive to build your own mini-PC that won't be twice as loud (at least) as the Mac mini. Not to mention that Cubid case is butt-ugly compared the Mac mini. And you have to assemble it yourself, and gather all the right parts, etc. Anyone who would even dream of doing such a thing isn't in the target market for the Mac mini.

      For another thing, Mac OS X isn't just another operating system. It's Mac OS X. It's perfectly designed for normal non-geek humans. It's beautiful. It's functional. As a component of the computer, Mac OS X has far more value to normal people than any other operating system. It just works better. It lets you get things done. That's why so many people are even happy to buy the more expensive Macs. It ends up being a better value. No more worrying about the 50 new Windows viruses and worms that come out every week.

      Until Linux gets the level of slickness of Mac OS X, there will be no Intel-based competitor to the Mac, at least not as far as the general public is concerned. As always it must be emphasized that we are not the general public. Nevertheless I am one of those who have decided that I've wasted quite enough time building and upgrading my own PCs over the years, and trying to do things in Linux that are much easier in Windows and even easier on a Mac. So I will probably be buying one of these too. I just don't have that much time on my hands anymore.

    12. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Also most non-savvy Mac users I have seen do run their computers under the administrator account which means if someone can get in they will be able to play.

      Uh, wrong. This hypothetical hacker would still need to type in the admin account password (the dialogue box is a sort of GUI front end for sudo) if he wanted to really "play" with the system. Admin != root. Root is disabled by default on OS X and enabling it is not something anyone is liable to do by accident.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:Strawman, strawman, strawman by bbtom · · Score: 1

      The case against...

      If something goes wrong, instead of logging on to a cheap parts site and getting a generic replacement and installing it yourself, you've got to call AppleCare and pay them hundreds of pounds to sort it out. The reason I switched back to x86/Linux was because my iBook screwed up and Apple wanted to charge me five hundred quid to fix the trackpad. Screw that. Two hundred and fifty can buy me everything I need to build my own.

      The other thing I've found is that OS X is a memory hog. KDE, GNOME or XP are far less memory-intensive. Get the best Mac you can get for £500, then build an equivalent PC. Do a complicated filter in Gimp and compare.

      Of course, this is all my opinion. Your mileage my vary. I'm not Steve Jobs, though I have impersonated him on IRC.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  142. freeminimac by the freeipod guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I know wired wrote back in August that free ipod was "legit"... anyone know if they still are?

    Since the same company is now doing: free minimac...

    Any followups on this?

  143. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by m50d · · Score: 1
    1. What's the point of it being so small then? I understand that it's not a laptop, but I'd see it as something you could take on a holiday.

    2. Usually more expensive, and for the new technologies USB is not always fast enough. Did you ever see a Firewire modem?

    --
    I am trolling
  144. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by Selecter · · Score: 1

    I dont think 99% of mac mini buyers need dual monitors. That's Power Mac territory.

  145. Romans by jridley · · Score: 2, Funny

    we all learned back in elementary school that the Romans used letters instead of numbers

    And they had no zero. That's why when the Romans wanted to get some math done, they kidnapped an Arab.

    Or at least, that's what my high school calc teacher told me.

  146. No digital audio output by ardek · · Score: 1

    Regardless whether it does or does not fit Mac mini's marketing profile, I think it's a shame that there's no digital audio output, because otherwise the Mini would have been an awesome for use as a media player driving a video projector in a home theater. It's got it all; it's small, pretty, quiet, reasonably powerful and it's got a high-quality video output. Imagine it coupled with a projector, cordless desktop and a Linux-based fileserver in another room... (There probably are USB-addon solutions to this problem though, haven't checked yet)

    1. Re:No digital audio output by valkraider · · Score: 1

      I think it's a shame that there's no digital audio output . . . There probably are USB-addon solutions to this problem though

      M-Audio Transit

  147. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by orasio · · Score: 1

    Well, you didn't specify, but at 6.5x6.5 inches, it would be a rather smallish ass you have.
    I pity you!

  148. Ummm, Penny Lane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So American's never listened to the Beatles? Or did they think that the banker mentioned in Penny Lane, never wears a Macintosh computer in the pouring rain?

    1. Re:Ummm, Penny Lane? by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      It's one of those things where I just thought I was mis-hearing the lyrics and never tried to check what they really were. Now I know a Mac is a Raincoat, though I have heard of them being called macintoshes but noone I know actually calls them that.

  149. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was pretty disappointed that it didn't come with a 16 port 232 serial card myself. I mean, come on Apple, you didn't even include and 8" floppy - who's gonna buy one of these?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  150. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary or cheap in UK by markdowling · · Score: 1

    coz you know it will be GBP600 when it goes on sale in the UK just like it usually is with electronics :)

    I mean, after the 79p itunes (vs 99 euro cent) we know Apple is capable of doing it to you...

  151. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by macpeep · · Score: 1

    On your URL, it states that the size of that thing is "2.5" (H) x 8.25" (W) x 10.25" (D)". That is, the volume is 3464 cm^2.

    The Mac Mini, on the other hand, is 5.08cm x 16.51cm x 16.51cm, that is, 1384 cm^2.

    Put another way, the Mac Mini is less than half the size (40% in fact) of the case you asked us to check out.

  152. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but that case is ugly. And the system you can put there (VIA Epia) sucks ass when it comes to performance. And you can't run OS X on it.

    Of course Mini is ntohign revolutionary. Small and silent PC's have been around for a while. But it is first small and silent Mac that also happens to be extremely affordable! And it offers better performance than those Epias do. If you want small size with better performance, you have to get some kind of Dothan Mini-ITX-system, but those are hard to find and they cost quite alot.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  153. read it again, moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this time use your eyes.

    he did not forget the motherboard or sound card.

    what does 64bit have to do with memory? 64bit programs dont take more ram. retard.

    1. Re:read it again, moron by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, 64 bit programs don't take more RAM, 64 bit programs also run no faster than 32 bit programs - the only advantage you get from a 64 bit processor is that it can address more RAM.

  154. Gaming? by colatek · · Score: 1

    that is why I got a gamecube and playstation. My mac is for my music, and other projects I have. I switched when OS X came out and have never regreted it one bit.

    1. Re:Gaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the tone of someone who is disagreeing, but you're in fact summarizing your parent post. Just so you know.

  155. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by hrieke · · Score: 1

    The Mini-Mac is the successor to the Apple Cube, which was about 5 years ahead of the curve.
    Steve Jobs is simply refining the old standard- Small is beautiful.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  156. Recycle please by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    There are many dangerous stuff in these computers, no matter it is intel/AMD based or a Mac. So please recycle them. If there is no such a requirement at your place, please have this idea in our mind. Maybe 5 years later, it will become a law.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:Recycle please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am really starting to fucking hate enviro trolls. We get it, we get it. In fact, most of us fucking got it years ago. So stop spamming it everywhere, okay?

  157. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
    what about if you want internet via your mobile phone company?

    Why on earth would you need a PC card for this? I can access the Internet over my 'phone using GPRS and bluetooth from my existing PowerBook and telephone without any additional hardware. I have a PC card slot, but I've never found a use for it (the FireWire ports, however, often have things plugged into them).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  158. Where'd he get a mini? by chiph · · Score: 1

    I won't get mine until Friday, dammit.

    Chip H.

  159. any ATA hard drive? by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
    I can get a Maxtor 200Gig ATA HD relativately cheaply. Does this mean I can put in it the Mac mini?

    Does anyone know the brand and model HD the Mac mini ships with?

    Sam

    1. Re:any ATA hard drive? by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      Umm, try and picture putting the harddrive into a mac mini. Think it would fit? Barely. I believe it uses laptop drives.

  160. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  161. lol, keep moving moving moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    always the moving target with you mac nuts, isnt it.

    next youll be saying something inane like "well YOUR wintel pc doesnt come BLESSED WITH THE SPIRIT OF STEVE JOBS IN EVERY BOX". no amount of debate or evidence will satisfy you, its like discussing allah with muslims.

    jesus christ, you mac freaks remind me of the old amiga / atari wars.

    keep moving the target...

  162. If the mini cooper has 5-ton towing power by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    I will buy one, or two, ah..., maybe twenty. By the way, I have a Powermac G3 blue and white on my desk, we only upgraded hard drive and RAM. And it works great with Panther. I really don't think you need to upgrade video card and sound card if you are not a gamer.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  163. Is the Airport/Bluetooth card available? by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    I see it in the store as a custom option when building a mini.

    But is the card itself available? IMHO I'd like the option to upgrade to it. Won't need it initially, but I can see neededing it in the near future.

    Considering it's both bluetooth and airport... it would be pretty sweet.

    I just hope Apple makes it available like the Airport Extreme card.... so we can upgrade ourselves.

    Put 1GB RAM in, and a 7200 RPM ATA/100 HD... and that box is kicking ass.

  164. because they don't go through doors. by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    They go through windows all the time, and they can NOT believe doors are easier for people to get in and out.

    I hate to repeat, but I still have a PowerMac G3 blue and white, 350MHz, feeling groovy.

    And I also have a G4 1G, looks even slower than the Mac mini.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  165. Re:Extension Cords?? Embedded systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is the question I have...what power in does it use? That brick is converting from AC to DC (hopefully for auto installs). It looks like the power plug on the motherboard is about 8 or 10 pins, so I'm thinking it is probably eating a combination of 3.3v, 5v, and 12 volt. Anybody see any specs on that yet? I'd assume the motherboard screen print might mention voltage levels.

  166. Re:Will be a failure by omega9 · · Score: 1

    What the fuck is up with (anti)fanboyism anyway? Do you get a check every week based on your amount of brand loyalty? Do you get kickbacks from Dell for infultrating and spreading the name? Discount airfare? A $1 off coupon for your chicken McNuggets? A cheap rate at Chuck-E-Cheese for your upcoming 13th birthday?

    Seriously.

    Also, never mind any of these details.

    (Yes, there're more then two paragraphs in that link, but you can take some asprin later and feel better.)

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  167. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    IN ADDITION USERS ARE ALLOWED TO OPEN THE BOX

    Of course, if you stopped shouting long enough to RTFA, you'd have seen how to pop the box open in 30 seconds with a putty knife.

  168. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary or cheap in UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to http://www.apple.com/uk/macmini/, it's GBP339 for the base. Or you can spec it out at http://www.apple.com/ukstore.

  169. I think a lot of you are missing the point. by paanta · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have a nice year-and-a-half old PC sitting in my living room, as well as a G4 ibook with a processor running at basically half the speed of my PC. The PC never gets turned on. Rather, it gets turned on by my wife when she can't rip the ibook from my hands, or by me when I need to run ArcGIS or AutoCAD. I'll probably always _need_ a PC around, but I certainly don't _want_ one around. Yes, its clearly a superior machine in raw computing power, but its not really designed to be lived with. Frankly, if I'm going to spend 8 hours a day sitting in front of a computer, I want it to be pleasant to look at and nice to touch and totally silent. I don't want the ugliest thing in my house to be the thing I spend the most time using.

    Would I tolerate a refridgerator that was cold enough to make liquid nitrogen if it also kicked out a 90dB whine? No. Would I ever use a toaster that was 5x larger than it needed to be and so ugly that I had to hide it under a desk? No. Do I want my toilet to blue-screen-of-death on me? Not particularly.

    1. Re:I think a lot of you are missing the point. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the most insightful post in a long time. Damn, twice today I have needed Mod points. I'll get them next week at a time when there are no good stories. :)

    2. Re:I think a lot of you are missing the point. by bbtom · · Score: 1

      I've got exactly the opposite deal. I've got an old iBook sitting on my desk and a homebuilt Linux/XP dual boot machine (for some reason I'm in XP at the moment). I spend most of my tube-time in Linux, just because there's so much more I can do in MDL, and so much easier. Give me KDE rather than OS X any day...

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  170. My Mini has shipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From China no less. Will have it monday.

  171. And why did you do this? by mrinella · · Score: 1

    Deliberately fry your Mac and have them repair it under warranty. Seems like pretty obnoxious action on your part.

  172. DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by djplurvert · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's VERY important that those of you who need PCI slots and super fast processors DO NOT BUY a mac mini.

    You are ABSOLUTELY right. The DELLs come WITH PCI slots, a SUPER FAST intel processor, and BEST OF ALL.....WINDOWS!!!

    If you start MESING WITH WINTEL SUCCESS by thinking of trying a mac now you will only DELAY the arrival of MY mac-mini which I will be ordering soon.

    It is OBVIOUS that any computer that doesn't sound like a 707 when you turn it on is NO COMPUTER at all.

    There is CLEARLY NO VALUE in reducing the size and audible noise of a PC. In fact, if anything, telling the world you have a little cabinet is BAD BAD BAD!!!

    The mac-mini is NOT for you. Please continue to purchase DELLs and whatnot so you have something to show off to your friends while you drone on about expandability, oh, and stop picking your nose.

    1. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wish i had your confidence there... The last several Dells I've helped setup and get running had NO AGP slots on the mianboard! Think i'm BSing? Crack open one of their mid- to low-range models and take a peek inside. You can see where the AGP slot is supposed to go, BUT! The slot itself was never installed!

      This is one reason why I urge my clients that buy Dells to overbuild their processor and memory so that Dell will be forced to put in the nicer boards instead of the low-grade POS Intels that they seem to love.

      The other reason is that I don't want to hear them bitching that their system is slow 6 months down the road..

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    2. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by djplurvert · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dumbass mods, that's SATIRE, not flamebait. There is a point in there, look harder.

    3. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. You must spend big $ at Dell to get an AGP slot. Otherwise you are stuck with crappy onboard or crappy PCI video.

    4. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by valkraider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this flamebait? It's a joke. Hint: look at the third paragraph, and read it again.

    5. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by djplurvert · · Score: 2, Funny

      "read it again" implies the mods read it the first time.

      the mods have no sense of humor I tell ya, no sense of humor.

    6. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it is funny that only two posts up, the one saying it is satire, not flamebait was marked as flamebait.

    7. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Maybe people are cold, and need the extra "flamebait" to keep warm? Trying to catch a fire?

    8. Re:DO NOT BUY A MAC MINI!!! by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Weird, what kind of 707's are you flying on?

  173. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

    FireWire media readers are the thing. And I use GPRS (data over GSM) all the time via my mobile phone, to which I connect my Mac with Bluetooth.

  174. if HD is too slow - could we use a firewire HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering - if the HD that comes with the Mini is too slow for video editing, could a person just hook up an external firewire HD and use that? Would that be fast enough?

    Basically, my question is: What's faster, a 4200 RPM hard drive, or a firewire hard drive?

  175. Antennas are NOT included with the box by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 1

    This is one of those situations where Apple is parting with custom. Unlike every other Mac model that's been produced Airport or Bluetooth "ready", the antennas are NOT built into the box for the standard price. The wireless upgrade kit, available only to authorized service providers, includes both the actual wireless boards and the antennas to be installed. It's a fairly obvious cost-saving measure.

  176. How Apple can dominate the academic market by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Produce an iPod that runs Keynote and outputs video to a projector.
    2. Incorporate an integrated reference/bibliography manager into Pages.

    1. Re:How Apple can dominate the academic market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An iPod Photo, coupled with the right software, can apparently do trick #1.

    2. Re:How Apple can dominate the academic market by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      An iPod Photo, coupled with the right software, can apparently do trick #1.

      I gather that this software converts a presentation into an iPod slideshow. This can also be done manually. But this isn't what I'm talking about. I'm talking about being able to put my presentation on my iPod as easily as I now put music on it, and having it play with all effects intact.

  177. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by BobNFloyd · · Score: 1

    Dell Business has this Dimension 3000 Desktop with 17 in E173FP Flat Panel Display $599 - $100 rebate = $499 with free shipping.

    P4 2.80GHz , 256MB DDR, Dell Keyboard/Mouse, 40GB Drive
    DVD8x/48x CDRW, Integrated Audio/Video, 10/100 Ethernet, Free ISP, 2-Yr Warranty

    2 year warranty, 17 lcd, keyboard mouse. The rebate actually come. Check bens or fatwallet to know that dell is good for it.

    It seems to me that the Mac Mini is not a superior system and any way. (well video maybe).

  178. No Gigabit Ethernet on the Mini by kris_lang · · Score: 1

    re 1 PCI slot is occupied by an ethernet card, un upgraded in 5 years. Gigabit is built into the mac mini

    Actually NO.

    The Mac mini has 10/100 according to Apple's own web site :

    Built-in 10/100 BASE-T Ethernet and a 56K v.92 fax modem give

    Not to say anything against the mini. I actually want one and will probably get one myself soon. It's kind of like the drugs that first get FDA approval. Let's wait till the masses have these and see what kind of symptoms and side-effects sprout. I've usually gotten Macs as 2nd generation items (nisei?) not as first generation items. Except for that Newton..., couldn't wait on that or on the original 128k and the 512k Palm Pilot when the logo on it was still US Robotics. m....

  179. And now for you cheap bastards.... by itcoog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Macmall is giving you a free keyboard and mouse if you order from them... Free shipping as well. http://www.macmall.com/macmall/families/macmini/ Much Love!

  180. Frequent Upgrade Cycle Kicked : not necessary by kris_lang · · Score: 1

    in regards to grandparent's
    The ability to change devices is the difference between a computer anyone can continue using for years, and a computer that becomes useless after 2 years because one minor component fails and there's no way to replace it.


    and parent's statement
    Instead of upgrading your machine every two years, you can simply buy a new Mini every two years. End-result is more or less the same, as is the expense.


    The bonus with macs is that they stay usable for longer periods of time. You may not need to upgrade every two years; you might want to or lust for the newest things though.

    Let me say that for some simpler things, my Powerbook G3-233 was doing just fine 'til its power supply went up in smoke (literally, LITERALLY!) and is being replaced by an iMac-333 (green) which I picked up for less than 90 bucks U.S.ian . It's got enough horsepower to run old matlab scripts on system 8.6, though I may have to up it to 9.x for the stupid Brother laserprinter driver which does a stupid system check and refuses to run under 8.x systems. This is one point where linux wins out: running gimp-print with the HL-1250 works fine for the 1250, 1650, 1440, and the 5040 under linux.

  181. Can I suggest another by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

    I would suggest the Formac TVR, it's about $30 less and does analog out. I've looked and there are a bit more complaints about Elgato's quality. I know it doesn't encode directly to MPEG, but when you have a chip do it for you, that sort limits your editing capability.

  182. It depends on what games you want to play by sjonke · · Score: 1

    I run MacMAME on my old PowerMac G4 Dual-533 with Nvidia GeForce 2 MX. It runs great, and MacMAME does not get any benefit from multiple processors, so it's a single 533 to it. I can play all but the very most modern games in MacMAME very well on this system. The Mac mini blows away my system in all but hard drive speed so it should handle it all with aplomb. If I actually gave a crap about UT 23 or Doom 12, maybe I'd look at a faster, more expensive system or even a PC just for games, but I don't. Probably if I wanted a game-only system I'd get a PS/2 anyway. To me the old games are more reliably fun, and still more original and they don't take up nearly as much time either.

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:It depends on what games you want to play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Probably if I wanted a game-only system I'd get a PS/2 anyway.

      A PS/2 ?

      Woow.

  183. Re:Will be a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude - chill. The parent post was a joke, riffing off Taco's famous dis of the original iPod...

  184. 16-port RS-232 serial card by tepples · · Score: 1

    Difference is that with some cascaded USB hubs, you could make your own multi-port RS-232 serial card. Graphics, on the other hand, probably won't work over USB or FireWire. It might work over Ethernet, but what firm makes X11 terminals anymore?

    1. Re:16-port RS-232 serial card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but what firm makes X11 terminals anymore?

      Wyse, hp, loadsa people from what I can see. I may be wrong, but quite a number of thin clients seem to support X

  185. 160mm square? by naspa · · Score: 1

    This is the size of a fingernail! It must be a Micro Mac Mini...

    1. Re:160mm square? by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Isn't 160mm = 16cm? That's a big fingernail....

    2. Re:160mm square? by imothepixie · · Score: 0

      America missed Mars converting metric....by a wide fingernail!

  186. Imagine by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of minis. Ha ha ... hmmmm

  187. Cooling issues by happyloman · · Score: 1

    I am very curious if there will be cooling issues with the mini. The G4 cube (although fanless) had problems shutting down because the computers heat would activate the power button. I had to install an external fan over the top vent of my cube.

  188. Are you sure? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I would agree with you but a few things seem to indicate the 500 also has the 200 features, mainly a like to 200 features within the 500 page. I was going to send them an email asking.

    Unfortunate if so, as I would mainly be using the S-Video capture since Denver has no broadcast HDTV yet (well, none that I can receive - they are building the main towers now).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Are you sure? by spleck · · Score: 1

      This isn't a full answer, but:

      EyeTV 500 FAQ

  189. That does seem like a good option... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I agree that letting you choose a compression of your own is a more flexible, the only downside is you'll need a lot more space to store the DV. It would be nicer for archiving of shows, less nice for just recording something to dispose of later.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  190. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Wells2k · · Score: 1

    I remember the old DEC Multia that had a pair of PC slots in the back of it. Guess what? No one used them. This machine has pretty much everything one could want built in, and if it doesn't, the device that you want to plug into it probably comes in a USB/firewire flavor. It is pointless and costly to put something like PC card compatibility into something that very few people will ever use.

    Plus, if you REALLY need that PC Card compatibility, you can always go for something like this:

    http://www.arstech.com/usbpcmcia.htm

  191. Where do they get them? by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    Yesterday it was an iPod Shuffle being pulled apart, today it's the Mac Mini being disemboweled. While I definately RTFA and enjoyed TFA for both, where did they get these units so early? The Apple store in town says they won't get any till the beginning of next month and I haven't heard of anyone getting either from Apple's online store yet.

    Maybe they're the leftovers from the promos?

  192. same power supply as the displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am told the Mini uses the same power supply as the new displays do. That little white 85W brick.

    You should be able to find one of those locally and check it out.

  193. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    I have a 15" AlBook that has a card slot. I never use it personally, but I know why Apple still includes it:

    Final Cut Pro users that need dual-channel FW800 RAID to their DV editing storage.

    Also, any number of high end RAID adapters that allow power users to connect into high speed storage.

    It's there for a reason. The PowerBook is used by a lot of Apple's high-end creative market and you wouldn't believe the furor that they would cause if Apple tried to take it out.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  194. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping that mine is going to cost $589 less... :-)

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  195. Much higher specs??? by Zo0ok · · Score: 1

    What do you mean "much higher specs".

    I have the pleasure to have a 866MHz Powerbook G4, AND a 1Ghz Via Nehemiah C3 desktop computer.

    I can tell the C3 is not superior to the G4. The Mac Mini comes with a faster G4 than my Powerbook has. The G4 has MUCH HIGHER specs!

  196. g5 book by siskbc · · Score: 1
    We just got G5 iMacs, and I imagine a G5 PowerBook would be a zillion times harder still.

    I'm guessing WWDC will see pbg5's. They recently improved every product line significantly - either by improved specs or a new product - except the powerbooks, which got a modest (and due) speed bump. iPod got the shuffle, desktop got the mini, iMac gout the whole new (and really cool) redesign, etc.

    I don't know if they're wanting to clear inventory and parts on the powerbook or what, but it really smells like they're planning something grand with the pbook. Like a lot of people have noticed, the iBook is WAY too close in performance to the pbook now to justify the extra price, and that can't last. It won't last.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:g5 book by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      They recently improved every product line significantly

      Actually, not really. Looking at MacRumors's buyers guide, the Powerbooks, eMacs, and PowerMacs are all long overdue for updates. The recent iBook updates were anything but "significant", also. And the Mac mini is a completely different ballgame than Apple's other desktops, so the Powermacs are still waiting for an update.

  197. Trolling 101: The False Dichotomy by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
    If you want to be a dull dumb boy and just BUY everything in this world, do it, become a robot consumer slave where in your view, NO ONE should have any skills apart from the job you do and be 100% a clueless idiot for anything else.

    I'll assume that you not only made the shirt on your back, but you also planted, cultivated, picked, ginned, spun and wove the cotton fabric, too.

    Or are you one of those dull dumb boys who can't even be bothered to make his own clothing?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  198. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by ManxStef · · Score: 1
    The Mac Mini is to PC's what the iPod was to MP3 players. Nothing revolutionary just asthetically (sic) pleasing.

    I know I'm feeding a troll somewhat here, but still, that comment -- just like Taco's "No wireless... less space... lame" comment -- shows how clueless some people are, even intelligent geeks.

    The iPod holds >90% of the global MP3 market, probably 95% of HDD-based players, which is HUGE. The iPod Shuffle will probably do the same in the flash-based market, completing the clean-up for Apple. "Nothing revolutionary", WTF? the market-share really does beg to differ!

    If the Mac Mini is to PCs what the iPod is to MP3 players -- and chances are pretty good that it will be, capitalizing on the failure of MS to curb the spyware/virus problems with browser+mail that >90% of people (many solely) use their computer for, by providing a reasonably-priced alternative (well, using the cheap "base-price" + extras sales tactic) -- then Apple will do VERY well indeed.

    I myself have investigated the small-form-factor PC. I bought the first Shuttle bare-bones case when it came out. It was much more expensive than the Mac Mini (though better specified), it was VERY noisy, poorly designed (PSU inside at the front of the case with a tiny fan venting at the side, but most of the heat staying inside) so ran very hot -- so hot that, when suspended, it practically fried the (full-size) HDD. It sucked. So I bought a Gigabyte TA-1 (around the same price as a base Mac Mini), which is much, much better, pre-built with a VIA Eden, requiring a simple memory and laptop HDD install. But performance isn't great at all and the laptop component upgrades (e.g. DVD-R or HDD) cost a small fortune. Price was around the same as a Mac Mini costs.

    Sure, designs have improved and you can now get a decent mini-ITX machine for the same price as a Mac Mini, and it will be much better specified, but you're missing the point with all of this. The average person is never going to buy a bare-bones and fit even the CPU or memory, nevermind the drives. Then they have to install the OS and all the drivers? Please! Time, funnily enough, isn't cheap, and researching, specifying, then building a machine like that will realistically take you hours, and is well beyond most people's capabilities or interest. The average person simply wants *a computer that works*. Take it out of the box. Plug it into the components you have already (monitor, keyboard, mouse, network/phone). Turn it on. It WORKS. Sure you can get this from Dell too, but the real potential for success is that it runs Mac OS X, which is practically immune to viruses and spyware (this is the current situation, regardless of whether OS X is actually more secure than XP; there have been a few critical alerts for OS X and some core apps, but very few remote root holes, and a lot less problems than Windows).

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not disagreeing with a lot of what you say, but you really are missing the point. A lot of the people on Slashdot (read: computer geeks) would be tempted by a Neuros or iRiver over an iPod -- they're both better spec'ed, after all -- and by a mini-ITX over a Mac Mini. But the point is, the Mac Mini isn't really targeted at us: it's targeted at people who don't really know about computers and don't really care; people who've got a PC already and are thoroughly sick of it slowing down & crashing due to spyware & viruses, and sick of having to get the family "computer expert" to fix it. There are many, many more of these people than there are geeks. These people want something that simply works, is reasonably priced, looks good and is easy to use. The Mac Mini fulfils all of these criteria. It's not really a hardware revolution, it's an alternative-OS-to-Windows & marketing revolution riding on the back of the iPod revolution. And it'll sell by the millions.

  199. AIEEEEEEE by ostiguy · · Score: 1

    We were buying hp d330's - 2.x ghz, 800mhz FSB, etc, etc. We were happy. We didn't have to pay stupid money for a "workstation" class machine, because after all, we were dropping an extra 1GB of crucial into them.

    They got discontinued.

    HP is now offering the dc5000. Identical case, identical mobo... wait! It is a "v" edition of the intel chipset, v for value, because apparently there is value add in AGP less computers. Same 3 pci slots, no agp.

    The only think I can think of is that Dell and HP wanted a way to (&$$ people to try to push them towards 1200-1500ish desktops^H^H^H^H WORKSTATIONS as opposed to 800-1000ish desktops.

    That said, paying for ram from the factory generally brutal.

    ostiguy

  200. Re:Ca-ching by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    For $500 you can get a propriatory system that is half the power of a system for half the money.

    Show me a $250 SFF system which is twice as powerful as the Mac Mini. Heck, show me a $500 SFF system which is substantially more powerful than the Mac Mini. Remember that the Mini has graphics with dedicated video RAM and laptop components to get down to size. I'll bet the Nanode will cost at least $500, and it won't be any smaller.

    I built a SFF machine for just under $400 last year. It's still 5 times bigger than the mini (it's a Mini-ITX tower), it has a shitty VIA processor and no graphics card. Same LAN. Bigger HD, but that's because I didn't mind the size of a 3.5" drive. Better sound and more ports. Homebuilt wooden case, looks nice, but cost me in labor. DVD burner, but those are expensive in slimline (available on the Mini, but not the $500 version). More RAM, but RAM is cheap. Didn't get an OS with it, it runs FreeBSD right now, might switch to Linux eventually. Works real nice as a file/web/print/backup server, sucks for anything else.

    Had the Mac Mini existed then, I wouldn't have bothered.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  201. Reverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think those of us who aren't homophobic are less disturbed by seeing an uncomfortable stretching of a healthy, if unpleasant body part. It just doesn't compare to projectile diarrhea.

    Tubgirl is sick in the physical sense. She is ill. Being more disgusted by a guy's surprisingly clean bottom than a dangerously ill woman firing off effluvium in all directions is evolutionarily unwise.

    So I'd say it's the reverse. The silly gay guy is human. Tubgirl is revoltingly bacterial.

  202. Windows guys get all confused about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Windows people often don't understand is that Macs and Linux PCs *don't get slower*.

    Mostly, they get faster as the OS is improved. Sometimes there's a new functionality that slows it back down, but on the whole, a three year old Mac runs faster than it did one month after you bought it.

    That changes everything.

    Windows people often think that the reason their three year old Windows box feels slow is because they've used faster boxes and they're now not used to the slow one they bought a long time ago. That isn't it.

    I'm running a three year old Windows box. I've *never* used a faster Windows machine. I've never used a Mac that's newer than this machine either. There's no reason for me to feel like this computer is glacially slow.... except that it is.

    We all know that's the way Windows works, that it bloats and cripples your hardware as you install and uninstall programs over the years. We know a fresh install speeds it back up again, but not for long.

    It's just hard to decouple that phenomenon and imagine a system that doesn't get slower often, that often even gets a little bit faster. It's hard to believe you can get such a system without tuning Linux performance, fiddling with the nuts and bolts.

  203. Pretty clear to me by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    This one sentance solidifies it for sure:

    A: EyeTV 500 is a fully digital product. It does not have connectors for analog video. EyeTV USB has a composite video input port, EyeTV 200 has both S-Video and composite video inputs. Both EyeTV USB and EyeTV 200 can be used to digitize and record analog video.

    Doesn't get much clearer than that!! Thanks for finding the info.

    I wonder if they work in conjuction at all, if you could have a 200 and 500 and have them work well together. I guess I'd rather wait for the mythical "700", a joining of the two devices (at hopefully somewhat less than twice the price).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  204. Re:$130 $50 by NetFu · · Score: 1

    No, he mentioned a $130 TV TUNER as the only alternative for composite video-input. The original poster (now marked "Troll -1") said:

    But what if you want to get composite video in and out of the machine?

    So, the point is that there are cheap alternatives for composite video input -- USB.

    Why don't you tell us exactly what you need to do with a PCI slot that you cannot do with a USB peripheral? Links to ATI's website won't cut it, you need to make your argument yourself.

  205. Mods: define "sarcasm" by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    I swear that some people are so blind to sarcasm that they could trip and fall into a large vat of it and not even notice.

    Flamebait, indeed.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  206. TOO small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I have been looking at this thing over and over while trying to figure out what seems "wrong" with it.

    Beautiful design. Just gorgeous. Well, except for the part about the goddamn power button being on the back.

    The back.

    The back...

    That's IT! With all of those cables hanging out of the back of this thing what is to keep it from being dragged off my desktop by their weight? Does it have two-sided tape on the bottom instead of feet?!

  207. It seems to me, OpenBSD by Kobun · · Score: 1

    Looking at the specs for this, the Mac Mini seems almost perfect for the powerpc port of OpenBSD.

  208. Missing The Point by macintaz · · Score: 1

    Apple is introducing the Mac mini as a secondary CPU to the Windows user that has been interested in seeing what the buzz is about OS X and the Mac in general. The cost is very close to the lowest cost Dell once you match up the features. The processor are pretty close in speed The Windows Gamer can get a Mac mini and a KVM and while online playing games can switch over and do the things that the mac does with out the threat of Virus, sypware ect Its more like a test drive. If you like it you'll have no problem spending more money on a higher end Power Mac Apple is just teasing all the windows users to try before you buy the big toy Apple is answering Wintel users biggest complaint YOUR TO EXPENSIVE!!!! I want a HUMMER (original) but they cant afford one so I drive a Kia Jus my 2 cents

  209. problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mini will boot from an external firewire drive just fine. Average data transfer speed of a 7200rpm drive is still slower then firewire 400.

    1. Re:problem solved by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      But firewire drives are very expensive, which kind of defeats the point of the Mac Mini.

    2. Re:problem solved by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Uh, they are? A firewire case can be had for as cheap as $20 that I know of, maybe cheaper. Then you add a full size hard drive. I've got 7 or 8 of various sizes that aren't being used. The largest is 60 GB, I think. I wouldn't be suprised if most of us have a spare ATA drive lying around not being used.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  210. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    I'd find it useful to stick a memory card reader in; the external USB ones are annoying to use in comparison.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  211. Free Mac Mini (like the Free iPod) by Mouse42 · · Score: 1

    http://www.FreeMiniMacs.com/?r=14164588

    Yup yup... it's from the same Free iPod company so it will work if you get enough referals.

    The offers are pretty good. Theres one for buying printer ink! Sheesh... I think just about anyone can do that :)

    I went for the blockbuster offer of sending movies directly to your house from a selected list. It's like Netflix, only cheaper.

    I'm just sending this out here because I figured someone might be interested to know about it. I decided to sign up for it because I've always had a difficult time with Macs and I thought this would give me a chance to learn more about them.

    1. Re:Free Mac Mini (like the Free iPod) by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Huh? How is signing up for a Ponzi scheme gonan teach you about Macs?

      And I have't bought printer ink since I ditched those crappy inkjets for a laser.

  212. Yahoo Messenger for OS X supports voice fine by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    The Mac OS X version of Yahoo Messenger supports voice chat fine, I use it well, not all the time, but now and again. It supports video too. So go for it...

  213. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

    To the contrary. If you use a USB one, you can just plug it into your keyboard. If you want to plug it directly into Obscure And Useless Slot Type #7 on the computer itself, you have to get up and go to wherever you keep your computer.

    Pain in the ass.

  214. Big robot control methods (was:Re:That is cool) by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

    So would a Cray. If you made a really big robot.
    No no no! Don't you know anything about how big robots are controlled? If they form from 5 vehicles uniting you need 5 people inside to shout the name of the attack you are using. Single piece giant robots need whiny teenagers with psychological problems in them.

  215. pwned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    beautifly written

  216. Apple ripping of customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Upgrade the RAM and hard drive yourself and save a bundle"

    ha ha. No surprise Apple's overcharging for upgrades.

  217. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    One word:

    Size.

    Ok - I use multiple OSs so I won't flame the Windows tech sux0rs MacOS teh r0x0rs line. The oboard video is pretty lame on the Dell's but they are fine for office work. Personally I would drop another 256MB in there - the same as I would for the Mac Mini.
    Both Dells and Macs have one similar problem. Non standard components you need to source from the vendor directly to replace. Dell's have non standard cases, motherboards and power supplies. You can't just swap in normal PC parts if stuff breaks. Same deal on the Mac.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  218. My Parents by rinks · · Score: 1

    Okay, this computer isn't designed for /. regulars. It designed for people like my parents. If you told, say, my mom she could spend 100 bucks on a computer (but she has to put it together) or 600 bucks on the SAME computer (that came assembled), it wouldn't be a contest. 600, just to avoid headache. They don't know the diff between Firewire 400 and 800, if they even know what firewire is period (or if they care, which of course they don't). I'm assuming this is the point of the mini-mac. No, I KNOW this is the point of the mini-mac, just as Jobs said in his keynote. Debating about what this doesn't have is like bitching that the KIA you drive doesn't have DVD navigation.

    --
    My good looks paid for that pool, and my talent filled it with water.
  219. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by martinX · · Score: 1

    The Daystar one seems to capture 1/4 screen only.

    The Belkin one ("Interview") only has drivers for OS 8 and 9. IIRC drivers for for OS X and Interview are available, but then you have to buy them as well.

    El Gato, Canopus or some other Firewire DV converter would be your best bet, but they're starting to get into pricey territory (relatively speaking).

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  220. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    Composite-in would be useful for people who have old VHS videotapes, and want to put them on their Mac.

    Some may not have a camera, let alone a DV one. I could see someone new to the Mac and video editing wanting to make an iMovie of, say, an old wedding video, as a trial run, before going out to spend the money on a video camera.

    It'd be handy if that could be done by just hooking up a VCR, without spending $100 or more on a USB-in. But I'm not sure how many customers would potentially fit this profile.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  221. Re:$130 $50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why don't the makers of these products release the cheap Mac version?

    It's not Apple's job to make peripherals.

  222. Re:$130 $50 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why don't you tell us exactly what you need to do with a PCI slot that you cannot do with a USB peripheral?

    Other than display Aqua on a second display perhaps? Or can Mac OS X connect to an X11 terminal on its Ethernet port?

  223. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by aclarke · · Score: 1
    OK, well I have a 12" Powerbook without a PCMCIA slot, and I really miss having one. For instance, I have a PCMCIA GPRS card with T-Mobile service. I can't use it with my notebook (I was using another notebook when I got it). Sure I can use a bluetooth phone instead, but the speeds aren't as great.

    I also have a PCMCIA adapter for my microdrive. I can use the USB 2 on my camera but when you have a GB or so of images to transfer, the extra speed of the PC Card slot would be nice.

  224. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by jcr · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how many customers would potentially fit this profile.

    I'm quite sure that someone in Apple product marketing got the numbers on that, and that's why the Mini doesn't have a video input.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  225. Re:iMac mini NEEDS a PC card slot by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Oh, sorry about that -- I was talking about a Powerbook, not the Mac Mini. The Mini doesn't need a PCMCIA slot.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  226. Re:$130 $50 by Walkiry · · Score: 1

    >Why don't you tell us exactly what you need to do with a PCI slot that you cannot do with a USB peripheral?

    Nice try, but no. The reply was "My PC's entry-level PCI video input card (ATI TV Wonder VE) cost me $50 new in box at Best Buy". I don't have to tell you if you can or cannot do the same with a USB device, rather that with 50 bucks you get a PCI device with shitloads more functionality. And if you go for a bit more you can even buy one you can use to plug in a second monitor and have a second display.

    Of course, if you're buying apple products you won't mind paying almost a hundred bucks more for the same functionality.

    > Links to ATI's website won't cut it, you need to make your argument yourself.

    Funny you say that to me and not to the guy I was replying to. Funnier even that you obviously missed the argument.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  227. Re:Will be a failure by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Thank You! I'm glad SOMEONE got the joke. (Obviously not the moderators)

  228. Re:Mac-Mini not cheap in UK by markdowling · · Score: 1

    The Register has an article on this - apparently UK mac minis are GBP22 more expensive even excluding VAT.

  229. Re:Other things that PCI is useful for by Trillan · · Score: 1

    The modem is in the base system

    Oddly. Apple has this on the main mini pages, but some of their knowledge base articles say it's not included on all systems. Perhaps they included it everywhere at the last minute?

  230. Additional 7200rpm available by a984 · · Score: 1

    Turns out 40GB/7200RPM is now available in US for $143.
    http://www.lookforpc.com/product_detail.php? pid=H4014R9200

    cheapest 60GB is not much higher $153
    http://www.gogocity.com/product_details.asp?dept%5 Fid=211&pf%5Fid=CO02HDD0758BM
    which is roughly what you will pay for 5400/80

    you will need a case to put your original drive in, so consider buying this $178 (plus powered usb2 hub, needless to say)
    http://www.gogocity.com/product_details.asp?dept%5 Fid=214&pf%5Fid=CO07HDD0745USBA

    Note that both drives are designed for 24/7 operations, so they should be reliable.
    http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/support/e7k60/e7k60_ ov.htm

  231. Mac Mini for $499 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just saw this

    shipping and tax are extra, but it is still cheaper than apple's price

  232. Re: HD Size do you need fans? by furrywithwings · · Score: 1

    I just ordered one the 1.42ghz version with the smallest drive they let me pick. The price for a 7200rpm drive at 160gb was $150. I also ordered ram through Kingston. It's more than a little bit annoying though that Apple wants to rape you on the upgrades.

  233. Mac mini dissection. by tnkgrl · · Score: 1

    So my Mac mini arrived Friday (January 21) and I already dissected it... Enjoy! http://www.kithology.org/images/macmini/index.html

  234. Re:Mac-Mini Not Revolutionary At All by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

    I'm a boy. Just like flat screens, a flat ass is hot.

    (Fuck, I wish my ass was that small. Stupid desk jobs.)

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)