Slashdot Mirror


China Bans 50 Games

Stargoat writes "The official mainland Chinese news agency, Xinhau, is reporting that China is banning 50 gaming titles. These titles include Battlefield Vietnam, The Sims 2, and FIFA 2005. A similar game banning event occurred six months ago in China, but not to this scale."

423 comments

  1. Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article:

    "Chinesegovernment in 2005 will focus on combating illegal publications. This especially concerns pirated textbooks, electronic publications and illegal journals that will have negative influence on the youth."

    It sounds to me from the article like they're cracking down on piracy and not necessarily passing judgement on the games themselves (other than the people making pirated versions of them). But then, it was written by someone that likely doesn't speak my native language natively so who knows? (Although their English is likely far superior to my total lack of knowledge of Chinese).

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by martensitic · · Score: 2, Funny
      "As part of the effort to protect intellectual property rights..."

      I'd like to see the US government crack down on piracy of Microsoft products by confiscating ALL copies off the shelves and holding "the publishers, producers and distributors ... accountable".

      But that's just me.

      --
      Ut Tensio, Sic Vis
    2. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really?

      From TFA:

      As part of the effort to protect intellectual property rights and create a good environment for Chinese youth

      It's most definitely at least partially censorship. The fact that they are banning several Vietnam War related games, which almost certainly show the Americans as the "good guys" and the communist North as the "bad guys", supports this idea.

    3. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by MoonFog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Further: Among the 50 illegal games, 26 are pirated game software including Age of Mythology: the Titans, The Sims 2, Manhunt, FIFA 2005, Battlefield Vietnam and Painkiller: Battle out of Hell. The remaining are illegally distributed foreign games including Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation

      I can't really figure out why they would outlaw FIFA and Sims..? I agree that it sounds like banning pirated games and not the games themselves.

    4. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Jackhamr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought that /. might be having problems today. I read 8 comments before I saw one with MS bashing. That is almost a record.

    5. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by MoonFog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But what has FIFA 2005 or the Sims done wrong? There might be a chance that FIFA has a country listed that China doesn't recognize as sovereign, but I'm not sure which one that would be (I don't even play FIFA).

    6. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by wfmcwalter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Taiwan

      --
      ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
    7. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by CiaranC · · Score: 3, Informative

      Presumably these games are not legally sold in china - i.e. They dont have a legal distributer, so the Chinese government is banning all copies of these games because all copies are illegal.

    8. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by dim5 · · Score: 1
      This especially concerns pirated textbooks, electronic publications, and illegal journals

      Pirated textbooks? Like the Jolly Roger Cookbook?

      --

      Is something burning?
      Oh, it's my karma.

    9. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 2, Informative

      can't really figure out why they would outlaw FIFA and Sims

      I believe I read an article (can't find the link now, sorry) that in fifa, it recognizes Tiwan as a seperare country, which China does not.

    10. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      There might be a chance that FIFA has a country listed that China doesn't recognize as sovereign, but I'm not sure which one that would be (I don't even play FIFA

      Yes.. They fail to recognise that Cupertino and Vancouver are not part of China.

    11. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      That might certainly be the case. They are cracking down on the distribution of these games and not the games themselves. Poor wording in the article.

    12. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes -- to make it clear, they're banning 50 illegal games, and in China they can be illegal both because they're pirated and because they conflict with whatever interests their government has. FIFA and Sims are probably among the former and BF Vietnam among the latter.

      What *I* don't get is why they're illegalizing games that are "pirated". What does that mean? They saw a guy selling pirated copies of FIFA on the street, so then they're blocking imports of that game entirely? If that's the case -- wow... Now that would be an anti-piracy method unheard of. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    13. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 1

      from TFA:
      Liu Binjie, deputy director of the administration and director of the state anti-porn office said here Wednesday that the Chinesegovernment in 2005 will focus on combating illegal publications. This especially concerns pirated textbooks, electronic publications and illegal journals that will have negative influence on the youth.

      illegal publications as in China does not like them, therefore they are illegal. NOT this is pirated therefore illegal.

      The administration has called for relevant departments across the country to clean up the electronic publication and software markets, confiscate any of the 50 games if found and hold the publishers, producers and distributors of these games accountable.

      Surely that are not holding the game producers accountable for having their software pirated? Some countries do not have the freedom that we take for granted.

    14. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, many mainland companies copy American and English textbooks in bulk and sell them to students.

      They are often 60-80% cheaper than the originals, which is extremely attractive to many students, especially if the school or teacher forces them to buy the books.

      I have purchased one such textbook, because I didn't believe the textbook was of any use except for one class. I do buy legit books though, if I find they are useful.

    15. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by nicklott · · Score: 4, Interesting
      which almost certainly show the Americans as the "good guys" and the communist North as the "bad guys"
      Actually, BFV is pretty even-handed in how it deals with this (the developers are Swedish not American). At no point is either side referred to as good or bad, (except in-game, from an enemy viewpoint) and China is not mentioned anywhere (though perhaps that's the problem. The version of events differs from the Official Chinese version). Possibly though EA's US-based marketing machine may have been handling it differently.
    16. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, at least we know that Herbert Xu wont port these games to Debian.

      *ducks under the desk*

    17. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sponge is right. FIFA 2005 (in the US called "FIFA Soccer 2005") has around 300-400 actual teams, including Taiwan's (ROC's). This really pisses off mainland China (PRC). So they made FIFA Soccer 2005 illegal in China.

      It is a little hard to understand why they'd think banning a game would be a good idea. My guess is that the leaders of China don't really have a wildly distorted view of the world, but they do want to control their population's view of the world.

      Of course, this doesn't really work because most people are not that dumb. For the most part, the Chinese people see through these schemes. But unfortunately they don't really seem to care at the moment how their government treats them.

    18. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by mgs1000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, in the 1970's neither country was particulary friendly with the Chinese. Remember that the Chinese attacked Vietnam in the late 1970?

    19. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 2, Informative

      I couldn't find a fifa article, but here's one saying that China banned Soccor manager 2005 because it "violated Chinese law, the Xinhua news agency reported..." because it "classifies Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and Tibet as countries"

    20. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by obsid1an · · Score: 1

      To me it sounds like the chinese government is already forbiding these games to be sold in their country. So if they do see these games, they are having them confiscated under the guise of stopping piracy. This is despite the government being the one who is forcing the piracy of them in the first place, but I could be wrong. This article really doesn't tell you enough.

    21. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are cracking down on the distribution of these games and not the games themselves.

      i'm not real good at nuance. so i'd really appreciate it if you would explain what the hell the difference is.

    22. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry... the link:

      http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6667257/

    23. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by r3dx0r · · Score: 1

      ever tried doing what you really want to in the sims 2?
      it's not as easy in china.

    24. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Chances are games like The Sims may simply not have any legal vendors in China. Therefore any version being sold must be pirated - QED.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    25. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like it's much more than that, wrapped with good intentions of "eliminating piracy." That's Commie China for ya.

    26. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that one of their goals is to create a good environment for Chinese youth I'd suspect the Sims is banned for all of the extramarital sex.

    27. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by I8TheWorm · · Score: 4, Informative

      That was in 1979... a full 4 years after Americans were completely evacuated, and SVN was overrun by NVN. The reasons for the invasion were Chinese claims of discrimination by the Vietnamese, the 1978 signing of the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with the Soviet Union led China to call Vietnam the Cuba of the East, and Vietnam's 1978 invasion of Cambodia being a threat. The invasion lasted four weeks, and was considered a punishment by the Chinese.

      During the Vietnam conflict/war, China was instrumental in supplying the NVN with weapons and funding. My father's job in the USAF was to listen to Chinese pilots who were carrying military cargo to Vietnam... sometimes Chinese, sometimes Soviet.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    28. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ultranova · · Score: 0, Troll

      What *I* don't get is why they're illegalizing games that are "pirated". What does that mean? They saw a guy selling pirated copies of FIFA on the street, so then they're blocking imports of that game entirely? If that's the case -- wow... Now that would be an anti-piracy method unheard of. :-)

      It could be that the purpose of these measures is the exact opposite. Think about it: if the Chinese government forbids anyone from buying or selling these games, then the only way to get them is to download them from the Net.

      If people buy games produced outside China, then money flows to producers outside China. With a popular game like Sims 2 this could be a significant amount of money lost. If, on the other hand, people simply download the game, no money leaves China.

      It could also be that the Chinese government sees the danger of effectively outsourcing their entertainment industry, and is trying to combat that. After all, would you wish your next generation be indoctrinated to Chinese values and pay Chinese producers for this ?

      Sims is filled with the American consumer culture (getting money and bying things are central to the gameplay), and I doubt Sims 2 is any different (haven't played it - I don't have a good enough computer).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    29. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ThaReetLad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But unfortunately they don't really seem to care at the moment how their government treats them.
      Or at least they don't care enough about computer games to risk dying for.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    30. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      You fail to grasp the fact that if the game isn't distributed in the country, all copies for sale are necessarily illegal, pirate copies. Thus banning them is less a statement about the game content and more an effort to get pirated software out of stores.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    31. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The relationship soured after the Vietnam-US war, during which Vietnam did receive massive help from China.

    32. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has blacklisted several games in the past for having Taiwan listed as an independent nation.

    33. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I meant to say the late 1970s, not "late 1970".

    34. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by northcat · · Score: 1

      If Al qaida released a game showing the WTC attackers as the good guys, then I'm sure USA will do something to stop it from entering USA. This might not seem like the right analogy for you, but it certaily does to Chinese and a lot of people outside USA.

    35. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ikegami · · Score: 1

      Why would you ban a game (both legit and pirated copies) because it's being pirated? It makes no sense unless there are no legit copies of the game in the country. How can there be no legit copies of a game in the country? Because the country already bans the content of those games (e.g. maybe the game contains a map China doesn't like). So no, this isn't a piracy crackdown.

    36. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by gigem4me · · Score: 0, Troll

      Look China is Evil, face it. I can't wait till someone attacks China. It would make my day I hate China.

    37. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by jaiyen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Among the 50 illegal games, 26 are pirated game software including Age of Mythology: the Titans, The Sims 2, Manhunt, FIFA 2005, Battlefield Vietnam and Painkiller: Battle out of Hell. The remaining are illegally distributed foreign games including Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation.

      If I read this right, it seems to be saying that pirate copies of 26 of the 50, such as FIFA 2005, are being banned as part of a piracy crackdown, and the other 24 are being deemed 'unsuitable'.

      I guess this would mean that legal copies of games such as FIFA 2005 will still be available.

    38. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "But unfortunately they don't really seem to care at the moment how their government treats them.

      You talking bout China or the US here ?

    39. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Well, I could think its because of the bad press that EA games got on how they treated their own workers.

      BUT FIFA? There only children! FIFA is MORE THAN LIFE OR DEATH! My god these are only children!

      *pan to chinese children that are now seen confussed as to what to do with a soccer ball on cnn8 news*

    40. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

      They are only pirated in the first place because they are already banned. Now they are cracking down on the ones that slipped through their fingers.

    41. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Monokeros · · Score: 1

      So, uhm, does that mean that it is legal to pirate all games BUT those 26? I must move to China immediately for the free gaming goodness!

      --
      The Statue of Liberty is America's lawn jockey.
    42. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

      Because as we all know, the right to freely express yourself only applies to the good guys. At least China doesn't pretend that its citizens have those rights.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    43. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by cb2star · · Score: 1

      Did you actually play the game and knew it was like what you said? Are you a little too hurry to draw conclusion just based on speculation?

    44. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ninji · · Score: 1

      Battlefield vietnam hardly highlights a difference in who's good or bad, its just warefare, they don't actually say "THE US IS THE GOOD PERSON IN THE FIGHT." Anytime in Vietnam's Campaigns, it just talks about the war as historically documented on our side, while it does try to highlight american values as being better...

      I think the reasons for the bans is, these games directly promote racism between ex-enemies... I mean, every friend I know was totally game drivenly racist twoards viet's for awhile after vietnams release, im sure its the same out there, I think we should feel better that the gov is trying to create a good environment, instead of promiting anti american warefare propoganda...

    45. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Freedom of expression doesn't seem to apply here either, unless you toe the line.

    46. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by JoeBar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is Al Qaida really capable of a full blown WTC game, or do you think it would just maybe be like a HalfLife "mod" or something?

    47. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cmon mods that was pretty funny actually... Fuckin pussy mods cant stand the possibility that someone might get offended.... blahhhhhh

    48. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And promoting one sides values as better is not racist? Why not just say, we are better. As with the vietnam side as you forgot to mention, values on this side is curiously omiitted? Maybe its because most Americans clearly have no idea what Chinese or Vietnamese value.

      You could be right about the banning of the games. No doubt a few invade Iraq games will be out in the future. However, the innocent people being killed, tortured and shot will be curiously omitted. No doubt if that was in the game, the office of homeland security would push for a ban. Not for any other reason than damage control I guess.

      Its not that i'm anti American, I just believe people shouldn't paint themselves as whiter than white, while criticising everyone else. Sometimes you're the bad guy.

    49. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by jaiyen · · Score: 1

      So, uhm, does that mean that it is legal to pirate all games BUT those 26? I must move to China immediately for the free gaming goodness!

      Well there's all sorts of pirated software easily available in China. Perhaps those 26 are the ones they are really serious about not allowing, while turning a blind eye to other less high profile software ? I'm in Thailand, and a very similar situation to this exists here too

    50. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by L0neW0lf · · Score: 1, Troll

      The Sims represents "good ol' capitalist society" and we can't have that, can we? I mean, what if you were free to do everything you wanted?

      The Sims also does involve romantic relationships and such, and while you or I might not think it all that graphic, you and I aren't part of a dictatorial Communist Chinese government are we?

      Sometimes it amazes me that they call themselves the "People's Republic of China". Got to be one of the bigger oxymorons I've known.

      --

      Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
    51. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by saider · · Score: 1

      This is pretty close.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    52. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Threni · · Score: 1

      > ever tried doing what you really want to in the sims 2?

      You can't vote?

    53. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by northcat · · Score: 1

      C'mon it's not even close. We're talking about international politics/issues here. Kennedy was killed by an American.

    54. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by freedom_india · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Freedom of expression also doesn't apply where the US Govt. forces ISPs to remove an iran-news website.

      Freedom of expressions also did not apply to Gi'tmo detainees...held without charge

      How the rules change when applied to oneself...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    55. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Considering that the US government has done exactly nothing to limit our net access to Al-Jazeera, Islam-uber-alles propaganda sites, or the many videos of heads getting lopped off in the name of jihad, I'd like to think that they would - at most - raise a fuss about it and then let the marketplace bankrupt the pubisher with no government intervention. Admittedly I might be giving the feds too much credit, but I really hope they'd take heed of that whole 1st Amendment thing we love so much.

      (And I only put Al-Jazeera in that list because they'd be an easy target for government intervention.)

    56. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      I bet we wouldn't. There would, as usual, be a huge crying shitstorm from the religious zealots, but then nothing would ever come of it, because all they're doing is political posturing.

      The nature of the US government is such that the only real measuring stick of success for most politicians is in their ability to maintain their careers as elected officials over an extended period of time. The notion that they should censor things, rather than springing out of any real belief that it is right to do so, springs instead from their desire to temporarily please a particular piece of their constituency. As it turns out, actually following through and banning something is completely unnecessary to that end - merely talking about it is good enough.

      The FBI might start taking a closer look at people who bought the thing though. That wouldn't surprise me at all.

    57. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by operagost · · Score: 1

      I agree. It looks like something was literally lost in translation. I don't see how even the Chinese government could see something objectionable in a football (soccer) game.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    58. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by operagost · · Score: 1
      Has this happened? No? Then it's just your wild speculation. I'm sure there would be protests, but I don't see how the USA could be open enough to allow tentacle Hentai and Grand Theft Auto 3 within its borders, yet ban some hypothetical WTC game. That would have to be one lame game, kinda like that one where you get to play Oswald and take a crack at JFK. Oh yeah, there's another one that's LEGAL.

      Have fun beating that straw man.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    59. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by operagost · · Score: 0, Troll
      We have no evidence the government made them take down that site. According to the ISP, it was their own decision. Do you have evidence?

      The Guatanamo Bay detainees are not U.S. citizens, thus habeas corpus does not apply. They are also enemy combatants.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    60. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ucsckevin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. Taiwan does not have a team in FIFA. Taiwan plays as Chinese Taipei, which was a compromise between China and Taiwan. you'll note Hong Kong also has a team. BTW, they do this for the olympics too. So the reason can't be "taiwan."

    61. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

      Well i was hoping China was taking a stand against FIFA (EA) for it's ruthless monopoly in the NFL gaming arena. Just a wish ;)

      --
      If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
    62. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget about Toronto...

    63. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      The fact that they are banning several Vietnam War related games, which almost certainly show the Americans as the "good guys" and the communist North as the "bad guys", supports this idea.

      Maybe they don't want social-activist-Americans to feel guilty about the Communistic purges that killed millions of people after the US pulled out of Vietnam or for these social-activist-Americans to ponder that the same thing would happen if the US were to pull out of Iraq today.

    64. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read your history, you'll find that NV kicked China's butt. Also, the China and Vietnam have a thousand year history of hating each other. Remember, Vietnam used to part of the greater chinese empire.

      So banning a vietnam game becuase it makes americans look better than the vietnamese would be extremely unlikely. Must be some other reason.

    65. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by shaitand · · Score: 1, Troll

      I don't know about FIFA but the Sims is a simulation of life in a properous society. It's modeled after life in the US. If you start showing people in China these things, they might start to want them and that could ultimately lead to demanding them.

    66. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Er... China overran two cities in 4 weeks, then pulled it's troops out. From that point on, Vietnam had a larger force along the border than China, but neither side attacked in force. However, there have been several skirmishes and reports of sabatoge on both sides.

      How does losing two cities in 4 weeks equal a butt whoopin?

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    67. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by sommie · · Score: 0

      Several Americans.


      :Goes back to checking his sealed room for bugs:

    68. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Just because China accepts the compromise doesn't mean they support it. They may still participate in FIFA or the Olympics or whatever, but be sufficiently frustrated by the status quo to ban games which include the Chinese Taipei team.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    69. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by grainofsand · · Score: 2

      Another oxymoronic country name is the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" - i.e. North Korea.

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    70. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by alpha_foobar · · Score: 1

      fair enough.... the games really do portray a biased against communism....

    71. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ToteAdler · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness for moderaters and reading at a threshold of 1. I only had to read 2!!!

    72. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Diag · · Score: 1

      They are also enemy combatants.

      ...allegedly

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    73. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by jareth_chong · · Score: 1

      [i]They are also enemy combatants.[/i] So enemy combatants are not human beings? [i]All[/i] human beings have basic human rights, and that includes the right to not to be tortured and the right to a trial. International laws and treaties have specificically spell out that governments cannot violate basic human rights. In the past, only rogue nations, terrorists and criminals, who were not obliged to follow international laws, would violate human rights. Nowadays, the US is violating the most basics of human rights. The US has regressed to acting like a rogue, criminal country.

    74. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by jdhutchins · · Score: 1

      The US government wouldn't do anything to stop it. However, most stores would probably not carry the game, so it wouldn't be sold in the US, but not because of government censorship.

    75. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are absolutely correct, sir. Let me guess--you're not an American? Because they certainly don't teach that sort of treason inside our sacred borders...

      (and for future posts, try < and > instead of [ and ], and also use <p> for paragraph breaks instead of carriage return)

    76. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      As a general rule, any country containing more than one of the words "Peoples", "Republic" or "Democratic" in it's title is usually none of the above.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    77. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Dabido · · Score: 1

      " Another oxymoronic country name is the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" - i.e. North Korea."

      Depends on the interpretation. The "People" are "Democratic" ... not their fault the Government doesn't let them vote! :-)

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    78. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Had it crossed your mind that maybe they allow it so they can monitor the traffic? Traceroute those requests? Figure out who you are and open an FBI file on you?

      (dons tin foil hat)

    79. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      Since when did talking truth become Treason? Freedom of speech is the MOST cherished of our freedoms and NO GOVERNMENT can take that right away from Americans.

      I was taught in my school that Freedom of thought and speech were to be defended at all costs and WILL be cherished and defended by who ever comes to power.

      What school did you go to?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    80. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by gigem4me · · Score: 0

      thank you for understanding my position, china is the devil.

  2. yeah... by essreenim · · Score: 0, Troll
    But then again, the Chinese government is very smart! hahah, erm

  3. Minor correction by manifoldronin · · Score: 5, Informative

    The name of the new agency is Xinhua.

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    1. Re:Minor correction by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 1

      From the article: "As part of the effort to protect intellectual property rights and create a good environment for Chinese youth, the State GeneralAdministration of Press and Publication (SGAPP) together with the anti-porn and illegal publication offices, created a list of 50 illegal electronic games in a nationwide check-up on electronic publication and software markets." At the bottom of this page are other news items. One is about a public nude protest. It contains at least two photographs containing nudity. What gives? Are the youth not allowed to read the news?

    2. Re:Minor correction by hmniq · · Score: 0

      The name of the old agency was still Xinhua :)

    3. Re:Minor correction by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Not everybody consider a naked person to be pornographic.

    4. Re:Minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very little nudity is pornographic, just as not all porn involves nudity.

      By your definition, mothers who touch their babies while bathing them should be locked up for child abuse.

  4. FIFA 2005 by CoMmEnT23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Last time I played FIFA 2005, I had to turn away because the gore was so bad. I mean soccer, geez, what's next, a ban on any E rated games?

    1. Re:FIFA 2005 by grub · · Score: 0, Redundant


      Soccer was gory? You should really try Manhunt...

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:FIFA 2005 by CoMmEnT23 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed the sarcasm there. It's truethat Manhunt was a gory game, but also and more importantly, Manhunt was extremely bad. It is definitely not a testament of video games that the majority of the population plays.

    3. Re:FIFA 2005 by eln · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, China already banned Soccer Manager 2005 for that very reason, so it's highly likely that's also the reason for banning FIFA 2005.

    4. Re:FIFA 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the sarcasm was over my head, I never play sports games :) Manhunt is awesome I'm playing through it now.

    5. Re:FIFA 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're thinking about British rugby, which resembles to American football, only without pads, helmets or rules?

    6. Re:FIFA 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China's beef with FIFA is the inclusion of a Taiwanese team. Since China does not recognize Tiawan, they do not want the game in their country.

    7. Re:FIFA 2005 by shish · · Score: 2, Funny
      I had to turn away because the gore was so bad

      You get to play as fans as well as players?


      (Note: post may not be retain humour outside of England, where football fans are stereotyped as hooligans)

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    8. Re:FIFA 2005 by CoMmEnT23 · · Score: 1

      lol. Yes, but it takes forever to unlock the riot gear. :)

    9. Re:FIFA 2005 by hawk · · Score: 1

      Next time, don't use a British team . . . :)

      hawk

    10. Re:FIFA 2005 by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Beat me to it!

      Is there a Vinnie Jones mod?

    11. Re:FIFA 2005 by iainl · · Score: 1

      To be boringly serious for a moment, the reason for the FIFA ban is due to the way that it agrees with FIFA's definition of national teams, and not China's, if memory serves.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    12. Re:FIFA 2005 by jasonmantey · · Score: 1

      The ban for FIFA most likely relates to the games views of an independent Taiwan. China does not view Taiwan as an independent nation and EA has given Taiwan the distinction of its own national team. For more information check out the original article:

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/08/16 24211&tid=153&tid=10

      --
      JM
    13. Re:FIFA 2005 by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

      >>Last time I played FIFA 2005, I had to turn away because the gore was so bad

      You should play the version where you can have Vinnei Jones on the team, makes Quake III look like a walk in the park.

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    14. Re:FIFA 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a mod were you have minor parts in Hollywood films, make some crap TV adverts, do the occasional bit of commentating and go bird shooting? That would be crap surely?

    15. Re:FIFA 2005 by iainl · · Score: 1

      Thanks - that's what I was referring to. Both games recognise Taiwan as a 'nation' only in that they include the FIFA-approved national side in the tournament.

      If China have a problem, I suggest they take it up with FIFA.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    16. Re:FIFA 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you really need a man.

    17. Re:FIFA 2005 by Null537 · · Score: 1

      (Note: post may not be retain humour outside of England, where football fans are stereotyped as hooligans) Oh crap, they're not?

    18. Re:FIFA 2005 by phorm · · Score: 1

      Is there a Taiwanese FIFA team? Then in that case perhaps the Chinese should exempt themselves from playing in protest, after all the game is only emulating its live counterpart.

    19. Re:FIFA 2005 by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      I think you mean s/stereotyped as/bloodthirsty vandals and/, don't you?

      That joke will work pretty much everywhere except for the football ignorant in the US and Canada. The Scots know, afterall Celtic and Rangers supporters like to kill each other, and much of Europe has had to deal with the annoyance and damage inflicted by roving bands of England supporters. They way I see it, its just fair payback for Celtic/Roman/Saxon/Viking/Norman invasions for the last several centuries.

      At last the Picts will reveal themselves to the Europeans... at last they will have revenge.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    20. Re:FIFA 2005 by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      unfortunately the Picts were wiped out/absorbed by the Scots - which was the Roman name for the Irish. The Celtic/Rangers rivalry is based on Irish who settled in Scotland before the reformation (i.e. Protestant) versus those who arrived after (i.e. Catholics).

    21. Re:FIFA 2005 by jesseraf · · Score: 1

      Either that, or the Chinese soccer team sucked.

  5. FIFA 2005 by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason I can figure that it's been banned would be if there is a Taiwanese team as an option.

  6. We all know that the gaming industry is out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. to undermine the chinese empire.

    :P

  7. Capitalist Overtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Battlefield Vietnam makes sense from the perspective of Bejing, but the Sims? Maybe the strict control of your people hits a little too close to home :-)

    1. Re:Capitalist Overtones by xtracto · · Score: 0

      lol Yeah, I also asked mysefl why in the world would they want to ban The Sims??

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Capitalist Overtones by govtcheez · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's probably because one of the major goals in the game is to "woohoo". You can also make your Sim gay; I don't think they'd like that.

    3. Re:Capitalist Overtones by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Probably to prevent half the country from playing it all day, causing productivity to drop by 30%.

    4. Re:Capitalist Overtones by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Having totalled more than a year of playing The Sims 1 and several months of TS2, I can however say that it will _never_ happen spontaneously. Unlike, say, "Singles" which gives you a gay guy and a lesbian among the character choices from the start, in TS all sims start as straight as a fir tree. You have to actually deliberately babysit them into same-sex love.

      So I'm not sure what Beijing is trying to protect the upstanding chinese youth from. From the idea that homosexuality does exist? Well, it seems to me that they had to already know that, if they pushed their sims down that path.

      "Woohoo"ing in TS2 is even more intriguing. Bearing in mind that it's not even some hot steamy pornography, but some cartoonish something-nondescript-happening-under-the-blanket animation.

      So Beijing is trying to do... what? Keep their youth (and by that I don't mean "children", since the ESRB rating already says it's not for children) safe from the idea that people can and occasionally do have sex? Just gotta wonder.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:Capitalist Overtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can however say that it will _never_ happen spontaneously.

      You are wrong. I have seen homosexual relationships emerge spontaneously in TS2, and also read about that happening on the TS2 forums.

      However, making your sims walk around naked does not happen spontaneously, you DO have to deliberately make clothless clothes in order for that to happen.

    6. Re:Capitalist Overtones by general_re · · Score: 1
      So Beijing is trying to do... what? Keep their youth...safe from the idea that people can and occasionally do have sex?

      There are 1.2 billion of them - Sims or not, I think it's a bit late to hide sex from them...

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    7. Re:Capitalist Overtones by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      You are kidding right? Anyone playing Sims 1 or Sims 2 would immediately realize that it's basicly "Try to live the perfect American Dream" between the constant and rampant consumerism involved and the promotion of open relationships it's surprising China hasn't put out a contract for Will Wright rather than just ban the game.

    8. Re:Capitalist Overtones by M0nkfish · · Score: 1

      ...Maybe the strict control of your people hits a little too close to home :-)....

      Actually, its probably because the game defaults to having free will enabled.

  8. Hmmm.... by confusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "This especially concerns pirated textbooks, electronic publications and illegal journals that will have negative influence on the youth. "

    I'm more concerned about my kids getting run over by a tank because they disagree with the government, or contracting some fatal disease because the country runs around like nothing is wrong, than with textbooks, publications or journals.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, if the government controlls all the publications your kid sees, then your kid will be less likely to disagree with the government, and thus less likely to get run over by a tank for disagreeing...
      See, they're just looking out for your kid's safety and adressing your concerns. [/sarcasm]

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by draxredd · · Score: 0

      you mean you are not living in america ?

      --
      --- Back to the trees, back to the trees !
    3. Re:Hmmm.... by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      What about having your kids run over by a tank because they got sent to fight a war in some country they can't find on a map?

      Keep it on topic.

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government is disturbed by a trend amongst urban chinese related to sex and relationships. Apparently there's been a surge in partner swapping or just very short lived marriages, and lots more not getting married and just sleeping around. This is particularly evident amongst the young.

      So like American parents, they blame video games and TV. With more force than american mothers however, they manage to ban things they don't like (some of which I am sure is political). I doubt this will be problematic to young chinese boys in search of the games.

    5. Re:Hmmm.... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked we didn't have a draft and putting yourself in the Military (Includes coastgaurd and national gaurd) was completely voluntary. Anyone who is still in from being drafted during Vietnam either wants to be in or agreed to the clause in their contract that states they may be retained past their elistment time.

      Either way they agreed to be in the military. And I do know people who have signed up for the Army in the past 2 years and fully expect to be sent to Iraq soon. And guess what, they don't care cause it's what they agreed to and they an probably find Iraq and Afganistan on a map quicker tahn you can.

      Tienamen square was the Chinese Leaders ordering tanks on protesters. Big diference when those protesters didn't expect to be put in harms way.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    6. Re:Hmmm.... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I'm more concerned about my kids getting run over by a tank because they disagree with the government, or contracting some fatal disease because the country runs around like nothing is wrong, than with textbooks, publications or journals.


      IANACP (I am not a Chinese Politician), but I suspect the rationale goes something like this:

      If they don't get "journals that will have negative influence on the youth", then they won't need to be ran over by tanks for disagreeing with the government. Problem solved.

      Totally backwards to what makes sense to us, but then we don't live in regimes that try to control what we can find out or not the way the Chinese government do.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  9. Piracy by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article says this is a crackdown on illegal games, and specifically mentions pirated versions of all the games listed in the summary.

    1. Re:Piracy by reggaepubman · · Score: 1
      And you will seriously believe anything that comes from Xinhua as reality? There was a popular news show in Taiwan that would compare news from Xinhua with what was happening in reality. It was really quite amusing.

      Remember the SARS epidemic? I think Xinhua said three people in Beijing were initially thought to be infected. They must have been an important three people because school was cancelled for a month and Beijing was a ghost town.

    2. Re:Piracy by fliptout · · Score: 1

      As some of my chinese friends told me, the trick to have so few reported cases of SARS in a big city was to move infected people out of the city. Quite amusing.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  10. Sims 2? by Rahga · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well... if women in Sims 2 are allowed to have more than one child, then maybe the Chinese people will start getting ideas.... The sims could lead a revolution, and their government simply can't allow that. :)

    1. Re:Sims 2? by Rahga · · Score: 1

      And yes, I have now read tfa. The headline was completely wrong. I blame slashdot editors.

    2. Re:Sims 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this may sound kind of lame, but the race of the characters may play a part. The Chinese government does not like Harry Potter for one. The idea of youth seeing foreign individuals as idols and rolemodels doesn't enthuse them one bit.

    3. Re:Sims 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame your parents for having taking drugs while you were a fetus. The article clearly states that the titles themselves are being banned. That they are available in China at all is because they are "illegal pirated software".

    4. Re:Sims 2? by Mex · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, the Chinese government does allow more than one child per family, there's just a couple more taxes that you must pay.

  11. FIFA? by nherc · · Score: 1

    Are those soccer (err, football) games REALLY that controversial, to warrant a ban. Some of the others I can sort of see some rational, no matter how warped.

    I wonder if they published a localized version where the Chinese team can't be beaten if they'd allow it?

    I mean what else could they NOT like about the "world's" favorite sport?

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:FIFA? by lxs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean what else could they NOT like about the "world's" favorite sport?

      Let me guess... Taiwan has it's own team?

    2. Re:FIFA? by Leadhyena · · Score: 2, Informative

      FIFA 2005 was banned because of its recognition of Taiwan as a country, which China has been trying its best to supress for some time. It seems that while China is claiming that this is an action to combat piracy violations, in reality we must recognise that it is the Anti-porn minister who's running this campaign so there's more than piracy that's afoot here.

    3. Re:FIFA? by P-Nuts · · Score: 1
      ...banned because of its recognition of Taiwan as a country...

      Does the Great Firewall of China block all of .tw then as the TLD system also recognizes Taiwan?

    4. Re:FIFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert on this, as I've not played a FIFA game (or indeed a football game or a game of football) since the mid 90s, but maybe the technology has finally got to the point where they can accurately simulate not just the players and the game, but also the crowd. Just imagine if they could portay the crowd of a Celtic/Rangers game, or a bunch of Milwall supporters. It'd make Doom 3 look like Teletubbies.

      (Apologies to everybody reading this who isn't British and hence doesn't get the joke.)

    5. Re:FIFA? by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Aussie rules football? Struth mate! I thought the chinese loved it!

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    6. Re:FIFA? by wenzi · · Score: 1

      Nope, does not block all of .tw, but some IP addresses are blocked even if they are not in a .tw domain but hosted in Taiwan. Don't understand the bizarre reason for the blocking. Sometimes things are blocked, sometimes things are not.

      I don't really care if the commies can read web sites in Taiwan, they have blenty of websites in their own country to censor and harass.

      --
      -- I doubt, therefore I might be.
    7. Re:FIFA? by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Not unless having .aq makes Antarctica a country. (or the many other non-country ccTLDs...)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    8. Re:FIFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the Italian league has Nazi Fascist tendencies .. oh wait thats in real life.

    9. Re:FIFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The equivalent is true for football (soccer) though. England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland all have their own teams, despite not being independent countries. Even the Chinese acknowledge Taiwan as an autonomous province, which is far more than the British regions are.

  12. Other things on the page... by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know about most of you, but the link to the story (with pics) of the naked PETA protesters painted like tigers garnered a lot more interest from me than "China Bans (fill in the blank)."

  13. Re:Get a hint by Stevyn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I thought that was in Singapore

  14. In A Related Story... by Ogman · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
    1. Re:In A Related Story... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Missouri has banned video games in their prisons.

      And this is a problem... why?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:In A Related Story... by goldspider · · Score: 1

      And the problem is?

      Why should criminals be given such luxuries, at taxpayer expense, when we have millions of law-abiding citizens living in poverty?

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:In A Related Story... by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Funny - I guess they overhead inmates saying things like "Gee, 2005? The past 5 years have passed so quicly. I LOVE those games!"

    4. Re:In A Related Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which begs the question: why did they have them in the first place? It's prison, not a country club.

    5. Re:In A Related Story... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      It's just like with jazz (paraphrasing Louis Armstrong): if you have to ask, you'll never get it.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    6. Re:In A Related Story... by Ogman · · Score: 1

      I think they should be allowed to have them, but they should have to pay for them, NOT use taxpayer dollars.

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
    7. Re:In A Related Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear they didn't ban "Barbie Fashion Designer" in prisons though ...

    8. Re:In A Related Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they be allowed to have them? It's PRISON; it's supposed to be a punishment.

    9. Re:In A Related Story... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I find that a much more interesting story, thank you!

    10. Re:In A Related Story... by Ogman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when you work for half a cent an hour, buying them IS punishment! Might also teach prisoners how to EARN something instead of stealing it, huh?

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
    11. Re:In A Related Story... by ambienceman · · Score: 1

      Why do they have video games in the first place. Unless it's something productive, I don't see the relevance in a jail having video games. Of course the physical activity, and maybe the inspirational movie, concert, but video games?

    12. Re:In A Related Story... by mikael · · Score: 1

      In prison, inmates should "pick up skills and abilities that will allow them to go back out into society and be productive citizens," Blunt said. "Playing video games doesn't have anything to do with either of those objectives."

      Maybe playing Tetris will help them find a job packing supermarket shelves and shopping bags.

      But it's sad to see the person packing your shopping bags wearing an employ badge saying "serving you for over 25 years".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    13. Re:In A Related Story... by goldspider · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer criminals learn that crime won't be rewarded with luxuries that, in many cases, they wouldn't otherwise have access to.

      As it is, prisons provide inmates with warm and dry shelter, three square meals a day, cable television, and access to recreation facilities, healthcare, education, and jobs.

      That's a far cry better than a lot of law-abiding people have, yet they bear the cost of supporting these criminals.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    14. Re:In A Related Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you play/sing jazz, you'll never get it. (It being real, honest-to-god music.)

    15. Re:In A Related Story... by Ogman · · Score: 1

      "That's a far cry better than a lot of law-abiding people have." Well, that's a whole different problem, isn't it. As for the games, I still think that selling them at the regular price to someone who has to work a very long time to afford them is a useful rehabilitation tool. I understand your desire to be a complete hardass, I just don't agree with it. I also don't see how, under my suggestion, the games would be a luxury. You see, they would have to buy them....

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
    16. Re:In A Related Story... by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "I understand your desire to be a complete hardass, I just don't agree with it."

      Indeed, heaven forbid that prison becomes a place that people want to avoid.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    17. Re:In A Related Story... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      Uh, so... would you want to go to prison if they allowed you to play video games at times?

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    18. Re:In A Related Story... by Ogman · · Score: 1

      1) I did not say prison should not be punitive. 2) I suggested that instead of banning the games the inmates should have to earn them on a salary that (in most states) averages pennies or less an hour. 3) I suggested that having to earn the games might prove rehabilitative by teaching the inmates that you have to earn the things you want. I can't make the point any clearer than that, and I would rather go to prison myself that try to communicate with you anymore.

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
    19. Re:In A Related Story... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Two words... Tossed Salad.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    20. Re:In A Related Story... by Ogman · · Score: 1

      1) I did not say prison should not be punitive.

      2) I suggested that instead of banning the games the inmates should have to earn them on a salary that (in most states) averages pennies or less an hour.

      3) I suggested that having to earn the games might prove rehabilitative by teaching the inmates that you have to earn the things you want.

      I can't make the point any clearer than that, and I would rather go to prison myself that try to communicate with you anymore.

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
    21. Re:In A Related Story... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      But what if the own the device. If you do not allow the prisoners to earn and spend money the only way they will have to acquire more than others is in the form of stealing. And assuming they will not want to have more than their neighbor inmates is as naive as believing communism will work.

    22. Re:In A Related Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm saying that perhaps people might be more reluctant to commit a crime if prison was a more uncomfortable experience. We aren't discouraging crime by making prison more pleasant.

    23. Re:In A Related Story... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if that principle can be followed indefinitely.

      It's like counting. For some tasks "one, two, many" works perfectly fine. And "severe incarceration" tends to blur with "very severe incarceration" rather easily.

      Of course, I belong to the rehabilitation crowd myself, so the whole punishment aspect is not the overarching goal of prison for me.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  15. Jumping to conclusions, are we? by Wells2k · · Score: 0

    From the article, it really looks like they are cracking down specifically on illegal copies of these games, and not the games themselves. The way I am taking it is if you were to purchase a legal copy of one of these games in China, you would be good to go.

  16. I don't geddit... by AgBullet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Among the 50 illegal games, 26 are pirated game software including..."

    Wha...?

    1. Re:I don't geddit... by ilithiiri · · Score: 1
      "Among the 50 illegal games, 26 are pirated game software including..."

      Simple: all 50 games are now illegal.

      of these, 26 are only found in pirated versions, because they are not distributed in china.
      --
      If anyone can hear me, slap some sense into me But you turn your head, and I end up talking to myself
  17. no more training? by Bolshoy+Pimpovich · · Score: 0
    Without real-life simulators of war like Battlefield: Vietnam, how will the Chinese youth learn to fight off the western infidels effectively??

    I mean... GOOD RIDDANCE!

    --
    Ehta nyeh IBM, ehta Macintosh!
    1. Re:no more training? by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Yes, because video gamers always make the best soldiers. Don't bother hitting up the high-school football team, or the track and field team, because they don't know that in war, when you get sniped, you're supposed to say "OMG you camping f4g!", or that if you get shot, you can keep your dignity by claiming wallhack.

      Somehow, I'd take an army of manual labourers and people who can survive in harsh environments over a group of people who dwell in darkened basements anyday.

    2. Re:no more training? by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "Somehow, I'd take an army of manual labourers and people who can survive in harsh environments over a group of people who dwell in darkened basements anyday."

      Unless they start giving them gloating lessons and severe self-esteem issues.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  18. Re:Get a hint by metachor · · Score: 1
    Games makers - All the game makers have to do is add an opening scene where that kid that spray painted those cars gets caned. No matter what the games was about it would be socially acceptable in any Asian country.
    Is this similar to how people who make stereotyped assumptions about other cultures are socially acceptable in any American country? Maybe all our games should open with scenes of non-violent drug offenders getting the electric chair.

    Oh wait... that's only the US.
  19. Re:In Soviat China by halivar · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, they teach you how to spell.

  20. Pretty violent by DOS-5 · · Score: 0
    Well I can understand as to why some of the games mentioned were banned especially the explicitly violent ones, but I'm not sure how games such as The Sims 2 or football titles are particularly bad in this repsect.


    I'm not sure what State GeneralAdministration and the Chinesegovernment were thinking when they complied it but I think it might be going overboard to ban anything that contains images that even remotely suggest potential acts of violence where to overall focus of the game is opposite to that.

  21. I was wondering about that too by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, as a die-hard The Sims and The Sims 2 player, I can't see much that would count as either capitalist or communist in it. It's a generic family, in a generic foreign country (they don't even speak English or any real language), and earning some made up currency (it's "simoleans" not "dollars", and you can't easily convert that into any real currency, because the price ratios and wages are all wrong for any real country.) They go to work, they spend their money on groceries and a bigger TV, and occasionally have dinner with their friends. They can't even open their own business at home, or anything that would count as capitalistic.

    I.e., it's generic stuff that's no different in communist China from the USA.

    I mean, that TS2 family could just as well be two communist patriotic comrades going to work in the government-owned factories, and buying their fridge from a government-owned store.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I was wondering about that too by Trigun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it's generic stuff that's no different in communist China from the USA.

      Like the idea of buying things for your family in order to placate them? Promoting mass consumerism as an effective way of life? Sounds like the Communist building blocks that the modern Chinese empire is founded on.
      (But it's probably because there is no official distrubitor of Maxis games as of yet, and all the games being retailled are pirated copies of varying quality)

    2. Re:I was wondering about that too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Like the idea of buying things for your family in order to placate them? Promoting mass consumerism as an effective way of life?

      Are we playing the same Sims 2? The player chooses which path a Sim will follow. If you don't want a Sim to have materials good be the thing that floats his boat, make his aspiration for family, or knowledge, or anything but making money. Sure, the choice exists, but you don't have to use it.

    3. Re:I was wondering about that too by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I can't see much that would count as either capitalist or communist in it. It's a generic family, in a generic foreign country (they don't even speak English or any real language), and earning some made up currency (it's "simoleans" not "dollars", and you can't easily convert that into any real currency, because the price ratios and wages are all wrong for any real country.) They go to work, they spend their money on groceries and a bigger TV, and occasionally have dinner with their friends. They can't even open their own business at home, or anything that would count as capitalistic.

      You're using language, the price of a TV, and the name of a currency to show whether you can tell a society is communist or capitalist? Are you nuts?

      The game is quite obviously capitalist promoting, from the ability to earn more money by advancing your career, the ability to change career at will, the ability to buy whatever you want without going on some waiting list or waiting for approval etc. (I appologise for inaccuracy, most of what I know of communism is sniplets from the USSR.. I don't exactly know how things are run in China right now...)

      And while it might not be communism persay, in china you can't have more than one child. In the Sims2 you can have LOTS of children with as many different people you aren't married to as you want. I'm sure this would be reason enough to ban the game in Georgia or Texus, let alone in China where they have so much more to disapprove of.

    4. Re:I was wondering about that too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the choice exists, but you don't have to use it.

      You also don't have to run over cops and beat up hookers in GTA, but damn it's soooo much fun! HA HA HA

      (It's also fun in the real world, too, but not as easy to get away with.)

  22. Chinese #1 news source - /.ed. by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congratulations! There are more /.ers than there are Chinese on the Net. Apparently.

    1. Re:Chinese #1 news source - /.ed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes sense if reads as "There are more /.ers and Chinese combined than there are Chinese on the Net." Apparently!

    2. Re:Chinese #1 news source - /.ed. by rishistar · · Score: 1

      But in spite of a one child per couple policy they still have a higher birth rate!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    3. Re:Chinese #1 news source - /.ed. by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      netcraft thinks it is on. So there must be something wrong with netcraft.com

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    4. Re:Chinese #1 news source - /.ed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more Slashdotters than Chinese who read the English Language version, perhaps?

    5. Re:Chinese #1 news source - /.ed. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Slashdot confirms it - NetCRAFT is dying !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  23. Re:Get a hint by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > Lawmakers - imagine what how other countries are using propaganda when you make laws against *EVIL* games. You may be making your country look more like a repressive communist society.

    By banning BFV, FIFA 2005, and Sims2, the Chinese are doing it to protect their society from the misconceptions that America was the "good guy" in Vietnam, from the notion that Taiwan is sufficiently independent to get a soccer team, and a game featuring characters that elevate their moods by "meditating" with pseudoscientific mysticism, see "ghosts", can enter same-sex relationships, and who frequently hop into a bed for pixelated "woo-hoo" -- the latter of which oughta be grounds for a ban in any civilized nation. But all three games are being banned for the same fundamental reason: they threaten the stability of the Chinese government.

    When our lawmakers do it, it's for the freedom and security of our children.

    40 years ago, Ted Kennedy had to leave his girlfriend to drown so he could continue defending our children's future. And the Senators from Disney probably had to snort a lot of cocaine from between a lot of plastic starlets' tits before deciding it was time to ban the internets.

    That's the difference between freedom and repressive communism. Honestly, we have no idea the sacrifices our lawmakers make for us.

  24. Restriction of Freedom for China is Freedom itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    I can only applaud the Chinese government's effort to protect it's citizens.

    Firewalling, monitoring, and filtering out entire hunks of the internet. Imprisoning people that attempt to view restricted political, religious, and philosphocal content (have to break a few eggs to make a omlete)

    Now restricting games!

    Good job! This is the only way a government can protect it's people from the horrors of child porn and hate speach. All dissidents do is cause problems.

    I look forward to the day that DRM will allow the government to control what software a person can and can't install on their computer.

    Unfortunately there are always very intellegent people that are mentally unstable that do things like distribute illegal literature, provide hacks to unlock restricted media, and cracks to install pirated and illegal software.

    All that stuff allows much to much freedom to people. One should not be allowed to break the law. Sometimes people need to be protected from themselves.

    Just a little barrier, a little help not to break the rules.

    The day that the technology that is used in Valve's Steam and Apple's Itunes makes it way to all software and into the hardware of all computers.

    All this freedom must be stopped. Hopefully the EU and the United States quickly follow China's lead in protecting their citizens against perverts and hate speech.

    Viva la Socialism! Down with Freedom! Up with government controlled capitolism! Down with philosphopy and reliance on self control! Cheers for redundant laws! Down with spreading illegal information and mp3's! Yah for the RIAA and People's Republic of China!

    Damn, I want to belong to the thought police.

  25. Gee. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    With counter-revolutionary titles like The Sims 2 and Fifa 2005, it's small wonder that they were banned.

    1. Re:Gee. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      I'm still upset that they haven't gotten around to banning my computer game "Central Committee Fish-Slap Dance". What does someone need to do to get noticed by them???

  26. In PRC by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Government bans Sims 2, they don't like competition when trying to run the lives of 1.5 billion people.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:In PRC by Kenyu · · Score: 1

      I believe the reason the Sims is banned has nothing to do with people learning how to run lives and the like but that it has the ability to have same sex relationships in it. That and the ability to have kids I suppose since they are only allowed 1 per couple ?? Not sure how their rules are now. And seriously, why would you want to teach people how to pee in other people's houses in a game and burn things down or trap people in pools. I think this is the type of mentallity they were trying to avoid. I used to love the game until it just became insanely stupid with the AI unable to learn to keep clean, clean after themselves after dinner and take showers... can you say micromanagement?

    2. Re:In PRC by jareth_chong · · Score: 1

      China banned the games because some are illegal pirated copies and some portrays Chinese and Communism as evil. In the case of Sims 2, it's because of illegal piracy. The game is not yet officially released in China.

  27. Really weird list of banned games... by CharonX · · Score: 1

    Ok, now this list is weird.
    Well, I'm used to see 3D Shooters on banned... er... "do not advertise the game, do not show the game, do not mention that you have games on this list for sale, sell the game only to persons 18 Years+" list (I live in Germany *sigh*), but...
    FIFA 2005? The game aint pornographic, or violent (except for fouls) and its not political either.
    Sims 2? Same a FIFA 2005...

    From the article: As part of the effort to protect intellectual property rights and create a good environment for Chinese youth...
    If they only crack down on pirated copies, I can understand it, but the "create a good environment" part is definitly weird...

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
    1. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I live in Germany

      Speaking of bans, they mentioned during one of the Prince Dumbass (the guy who wore the Nazi outfit to the party) news blurbs about Germany's ban on the swastica. Do they grant waivers for things like history books? Or do they have to blur out the symbol in any historical photos, or something?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by Xepo · · Score: 1

      ...but the "create a good environment" part is definitly weird...

      Dude, you don't know much about China, do you? Go read a bit, heck, even the other slashdot comments would help. Given China's history, this is *nothing* out of the ordinary.

    3. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by pastpolls · · Score: 1

      Sims2 allows for personal freedoms.... like speech and expression, albeit simulated. I think FIFA 2005 had product placement also.

    4. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they banned Fifa because under the list of countries the listed Taiwan.

    5. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      political reasons.

      afaik fifa 2005 has taiwan as a nation. they like to pretend in china that it isn't so.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do they grant waivers for things like history books?

      Yes, they do. It would be a little pointless and self-defeating to remove them or blur them out from historic documents.

    7. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's perfectly alright to use swastikas in germany for teaching history/making movies/playing theatres etc...

    8. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although a bit tasteless, a Family Guy quote fits here so well:

      [Brian and Stewie are on a German tour bus]
      German Tour Guide: You vill find more on Germany's contributions to ze arts in ze pamphlets ve have provided.
      Brian Griffin : Yeah, about your pamphlet... uh, I'm not seeing anything about German history between 1939 and 1945. There's just a big gap.
      Tour guide: Everyone vas on vacation. On your left is Munich's first city hall, erected in 15...
      Brian Griffin : Wait, what are you talking about? Germany invaded Poland in 1939 and...
      Tour Guide: We were invited. Punch vas served. Check vit Poland.
      Brian Griffin : You can't just ignore those years. Thomas Mann fled to America because of Nazism's stranglehold on Germany.
      Tour guide: Nope, nope. He left to manage a Dairy Queen.
      Brian Griffin : A Dairy Queen? That's preposterous.
      Tour guide: I vill hear no more insinuations about the German people. Nothing bad happened. Sie werden sich hinsetzen. Sie werden ruhig sein. Sie werden nicht beleidigen Deutschland. (You will sit down. You will shut up. You will not insult Germany.)
      [throws his hand up in a Hitler salute]
      Brian Griffin : ...uh, is that a beer hall?
      Tour guide: Oh yes, Munich is renowned for its historic beer halls.

    9. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this was covered in Family Guy:

      [Brian and Stewie are on a German tour bus]
      German Tour Guide: You vill find more on Germany's contributions to ze arts in ze pamphlets ve have provided.
      Brian Griffin: Yeah, about your pamphlet... uh, I'm not seeing anything about German history between 1939 and 1945. There's just a big gap.
      Tour guide: Everyone vas on vacation. On your left is Munich's first city hall, erected in 15...
      Brian Griffin: Wait, what are you talking about? Germany invaded Poland in 1939 and...
      Tour Guide: We were invited. Punch vas served. Check vit Poland.
      Brian Griffin: You can't just ignore those years. Thomas Mann fled to America because of Nazism's stranglehold on Germany.
      Tour guide: Nope, nope. He left to manage a Dairy Queen.
      Brian Griffin: A Dairy Queen? That's preposterous.
      Tour guide: I vill hear no more insinuations about the German people! Nothing bad happened! Sie werden sich hinsetzen! Sie werden ruhig sein! Sie werden nicht beleidigen Deutschland! (You will sit down! You will shut up! You will not insult Germany!)
      [throws his hand up in a Hitler salute]
      Brian Griffin: ...uh, is that a beer hall?
      Tour guide: Oh yes, Munich is renowned for its historic beer halls.

    10. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by CharonX · · Score: 1

      It depends...
      If you use it in a "normal" way e.g. movies about WW 2, books about WW 2 etc. its acceptable - always provided you don't glorify the Nazi regime or try to make their inhuman acts "harmless" etc.
      In games, its a big no-go. Put a single symbol in a game and you might got only land on the "Index" (the nice no advertising etc. list mentioned before) but it might even be banned & seized.
      The Nazi regime is a very touchy subjet here still...

      --
      +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
    11. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      One of the big things mentioned on Paradox Interactive Forums (a Sweedish Game Company) is that you can have Swastikas on media of "artistic nature" and video games are not considered art. It's really not that big of deal. Just swap it out with the old Prussian Tricolors or Iron cross.

      In France I don't think they allow it even in art.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    12. Re:Really weird list of banned games... by js7a · · Score: 1

      So, who gets to decide what's historic and what's infringing?

  28. read the article by Dr.Opveter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Some have already mentioned, but this does not seem to be what the headline wants you to believe.
    The games are banned because they are either pirated copies of popular games, or they are illegally imported.

    --
    Sample this!
  29. Potential WTO fight? by bstarrfield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China seems to be if not exactly ignoring the WTO and GATT agreements, then playing loosely with them. American and European governments promised their voters that China's entry into the various world trade organizations would a) promote democracy, and b) allow the West to export high-tech products to China.

    Point A doesn't seem to be happening very quickly, but we can have hope for the future. On Point B, the Chinese economy is frankly wiping the West, exporting tons of goods and importing relatively little (while supporting the dollar's high value).

    We may think that this is only about IP, but software is one of the few things the West can hope to compete in. This seems like a legitamate GATT / WTO offense. It would be pretty fun to see these agreements actually work for the benefit of the US by overturning the software ban.

    --
    /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
    1. Re:Potential WTO fight? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      This seems like a legitamate GATT / WTO offense. It would be pretty fun to see these agreements actually work for the benefit of the US by overturning the software ban.

      The United States has a long history of using and abusing multilateral trade agreements and organizations. The U.S. government regularly ignores WTO rulings that are not favourable to American interests. Ask Canada about this, for example with respect to softwood lumber.

      The United States is welcome to get into a pissing match with China over subsidies, duties, import/export restrictions, and the like--but I'm pretty sure that China has the right to restrict whether or not certain products are sold within their borders. The WTO gets involved if a country is unfairly subsidizing or privileging local products over imported equivalents; I don't think they have standing to interfere with a government forbidding a product because it is 'obscene' or similar.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:Potential WTO fight? by Shihar · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't understand the WTO if you think the US is ignoring its regulations. The WTO is basically a way for nations to agree upon rules of trade. If a nation breaks one of those rules, it can then go to the WTO. Recognizing that nations are sovereign and not about to give up their right to determine fiscal policy, enforcement of the rules is handled through sanctions. So, if the US decides to break the rules, the WTO can't simply change US law. What it can do is prescribe a method of restitution that other nations will follow.

      An example of this is that US got in a trading tift with Europe. I forget the details off of the top of my head, but basically the US argued that they had not done anything wrong. The EU went to the WTO and the WTO ruled that the US was indeed violating their agreement. At that point it started to impose sanctions on the US that got increasingly harsher the longer the US continued with its practices. The US eventually caved and the sanctions were lifted.

  30. My Rights? What's this got to do with... by cnelzie · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...my rights?

    Shouldn't this be under "Chinese Dissident's Rights Online" or "Chinese Citizen Rights Online" or "Chinese Criminal Ring Rights Online"?

    From some of the other comments I have read, it seems as though this could be something to do with battling piracy. I will have to read the article to find out. I still have no idea what this would have to do with my rights...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:My Rights? What's this got to do with... by Chatsubo · · Score: 1

      Well, "my" is a very relative term. Isn't it?

      If I were a chinese citizen and saw this story, it would be about "my rights".

      What about stories covering EU software patents, or the DMCA? They certainly don't cover every living human being in the world. You prob. live in one of these countries (I'm guessing, really), and those stories would have relevance to you.

      But I don't. So how is the "my rights" part of it any more true in those cases? In fact, I've never even seen a story covering "my rights", specifically. Are you suggesting that they create a section for every country in the world?

      --
      > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
    2. Re:My Rights? What's this got to do with... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

      Sure, why not.

      That's beside the point though. Slashdot has and likely always will be, very North American, (United States specifically) centric in their news reporting.

      To be even more finely grained, Slashdot is more "Mid-West" then any other part of the US as well. As I understand it, most of the founding team members were born and raised in the Mid-West.

      Anyway, now we are incredibly digressing from the topic.

      Things in Europe should be "European Rights Online". Stories from China should be "Chinese Rights Online" and so on...

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  31. Re:Get a hint by flumps · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's the difference between freedom and repressive communism. Honestly, we have no idea the sacrifices our lawmakers make for us.

    You forgot the 500 an hour AND a nice cushy chair to sit in ;)

    --
    "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
  32. Other games by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    They also banned Barbie's Horse Adventures, but I can't really blame them for that one.

    If they banned Katamari Damacy I think we should go immediately to DEFCON 2. And if they banned Ratchet & Clank games, well, it's time to send in Marines armed with sheepinators.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  33. In another recent move... by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1


    In another recent annoucement, the Chinese government has decided to ban fun, sex, and eating while watching TV. All of these activities are considered bad for the youth of China...

    Seriously, how could the culture that discovered gunpower, steam power, acupuncture, and nearly started the industrial revolution hundreds of years before Europe/America did end up in its current situation?

    1. Re:In another recent move... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Blame a totalitarian state and the Cultural Revolution.

    2. Re:In another recent move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a closely monitored and controlled populace, with their rights limited by law, with harsh punishments (death penalty, imprisonment without charge, etc), and a ruling elite will basically stop a country from developing further.

      And then there is China too.

    3. Re:In another recent move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously, how could the culture that discovered gunpower, steam power, acupuncture, and nearly started the industrial revolution hundreds of years before Europe/America did end up in its current situation?


      They left the design of their government to socialists, and its maintenance to the military, instead of from the philosophers and by the people, respectively.
  34. Who's the dumbass... by Mudcathi · · Score: 1
    ... who modded the parent -1 flamebait? From the article:
    Among the 50 illegal games, 26 are pirated game software including Age of Mythology: the Titans, The Sims 2, Manhunt, FIFA 2005, Battlefield Vietnam and Painkiller: Battle out of Hell. The remaining are illegally distributed foreign games including Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation.
    The parent was just restating what was in the article! AND it was informative!! (It made me go back and RTFA twice :)
    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    1. Re:Who's the dumbass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's me, AC! Nice to meetcha, mud slinger!

  35. CHINA?!? Cracking Down on PIRACY??? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Uh Huh.

    And in a related story, the National Hockey League just announced a new expansion team in Hell.

  36. Oh no!!! I hope they didn't ban..... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever!!!!! Now we'll NEVER see it...

  37. Easy by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Seriously, how could the culture that discovered gunpower, steam power, acupuncture, and nearly started the industrial revolution hundreds of years before Europe/America did end up in its current situation?

    They discovered ideology.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Easy by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Your conclusion is surprisingly accurate.

      In Europe, when Christopher Colombus wanted to fund an expedition to reach India by sailing West, he went to one government. He was turned down. He went to another. Also turned down. He went to several different European countries, all relatively close to each other, until he had a government tell him, "Yes."

      China has had a single unified power structure governing the entire area for thousands of years. If a dynasty decided it didn't like your newfangled device or research area, then you didn't get to do it.

      The geography that allows China to have a single power structure rule over it, and geography that keeps Europe divided despite multiple attempts to compeltely conquer it, turn out to be the main difference here. There are all these countries nearby each other in Europe; that increases the odds that you can travel somewhere where they have a pro-R&D ideology, if you can't find it in your own country.

      Incidentally, I suspect that this "banning" China is doing will be slightly more effective than screaming at a brick wall. They have made their rule; fat chance of them actually being able to enforce it.

  38. Mod parent up by Dr.Opveter · · Score: 1

    It's rated flamebait right now, and i don't think that's right

    --
    Sample this!
    1. Re:Mod parent up by 10537 · · Score: 1

      I second that. If only this had appeared earlier -- I just used up my last mod point this morning!

      /. is going to the dogs -- countless old or repeated stories, pointing to press releases and calling them news, a total lack of grammar and spelling skills when posting stories, and an almost pathological desire to finish them with some sort of unwarranted barbed comment are bad enough, but if you also factor in mods who obviously haven't RTFA and need a serious beating with the clue stick it's a pretty sad state of affairs. AOL may have just been denied Usenet access, but they couldn't hold a candle to the people on /. who should know better!

      [ Yeah, yeah, -1: Flamebait/Troll for me. BFD! ]

      --
      This sentence no verb.
  39. Civilization? by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    [Spies tell us the Chinese government has been overthrown]

    [Spies tell us the Chinese government is now a democracy: Mao, President of the Chinese]

    "The Chinese Ambassador wishes to speak with you."

    Chinese: "Tremble in awe ah before Mao, President of the Chinese."

    Chinese: "We grow jealous of your privileged lifestyle. We demand you give us [gunpowder]."

    Carthaginians: "Your civilization is not ready for such knowledge. Will you take [The Wheel] instead?"

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Civilization? by Carthag · · Score: 1

      I would never give them the wheel. They could make chariots!

  40. Governments are not concerned... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm more concerned about my kids getting run over by a tank because they disagree with the government, or contracting some fatal disease because the country runs around like nothing is wrong, than with textbooks, publications or journals.

    My friend, it is time to learn that all types of governments have one thing in common, and that is that they don't care about you in the slightest. They organize to use you for power. You don't even have a choice. There is only one thing that they do care about, and that is maintaining the special position that they have on top of you. This is the same the world over throughout history. I dare say it is inescapable.

    Whether it be a cultural dictatorship that seeks to keep you in line by giving you no options to think for yourself, or a "no real choice" representative democracy that has two parties that look the same, it doesn't matter what you think. Pull the lever, bucko. No matter what you do, no matter what they say about thinking about "your ethnic identity" or "your freedoms" they still will give most favored nation status to ethnic cleansing butchers and corporations that make plastic crap, because that's where the friends are (and by friends, I mean pieces of paper with other famously successful a-holes on it), and honestly, who could turn down that much oil and cheap labor? I mean, cmon! Remember, life is a video game where the objective is to rack up a bank account score with as many zeros as a galaga champion on a three day meth binge.

    Let me put it this way, your money (stamped with the very face of the kings that made the rules your life) has always been taken out of your hardworking hands and given to some bastard at the top to buy polo ponies. It's a graft... a fleecing of the many for the excess of the few, and their friends. Whether they are in charge of China, or getting seven hundred dollars for a special bolt for that aircraft carrier, or in charge of Citibank, in short, we play by their rules, and so they screw us, like they always have throughout history.

    Best to find a way make as much freedom, time, happiness, and peace on your own. If you look to those guys for it, you really will get run over by a tank, for their profit margins.

    1. Re:Governments are not concerned... by confusion · · Score: 1

      See the difference is that I'm working hard to be the guy buying the polo ponies.

      Pretty depressing view of the world, there buddy. You might want to take a walk or something. It is true that governments will do what they want, the difference is that, for the most part, we are allowed to live our lives the way we want, while many others are not.

      Jerry
      http://www.syslog.org/

    2. Re:Governments are not concerned... by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 3, Insightful
      See the difference is that I'm working hard to be the guy buying the polo ponies.

      The delusion that this is possible is the reason capitalism works.

      You are correct that we enjoy more freedoms than many other countries. However, that doesn't make the the grandparent any less correct.

    3. Re:Governments are not concerned... by datastalker · · Score: 1

      I consider myself a pessimist, but damn, that was one of the most depressing posts I have ever read. As someone in the thread has already pointed out - we have it better than most. Sure, the system needs fixing, we need more political parties, and yes, there are a few rich exploiting a lot of poor.

      The difference, eloquently summed up by another as in "we have more freedom", is that you are free to become one of those few rich, and in your cynical view, exploit the many poor. While not everyone is poor out of choice, some of the poor are there due to laziness. When was the last time you did something to change your situation, or the situation of those around you for the better? Even if you believe your post, and are firmly convinced that the polo-pony riding elite power structure will never change, you can still make every effort to go out and get yourself a pony and fake your way into the country club.

      In China, there's no such avenue. In China, you can't have more than one child, and the ratio of male to females in the country is regulated by the government, to the point where I've heard that girls are regularly aborted. (I can neither confirm nor deny that, as I've never been to China.) In the US, you can have as many kids as you (if you're female) want, or as many as your wife will bear you. Imagine not being able to have a second child - and because the government says so!

      As I say to all apologists like yourself, not everything is perfect, and there's a lot that needs fixing. But when the prevailing attitude is sheer misery, and no one does anything about it, it actually gives the polo-pony jockeys that much more power, as apathy and despair are their greatest tools in exploitation.

    4. Re:Governments are not concerned... by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      In China, there's no such avenue. In China, you can't have more than one child, and the ratio of male to females in the country is regulated by the government, to the point where I've heard that girls are regularly aborted. (I can neither confirm nor deny that, as I've never been to China.)

      Girls are regularly aborted (or killed after birth) in China but not because of any government policy; it's because since ancient times, the culture values men more than women, and if parents are to have only one child, they want it to be a son so they have more status and their son can take care of them when they grow old. It's actually a very anti-communist way of thinking. As evil as Communism may be, men and women are equal in it.

      In the US, you can have as many kids as you (if you're female) want, or as many as your wife will bear you. Imagine not being able to have a second child - and because the government says so!

      To be fair, the US also does not have the pressing overpopulation problem that China has.

    5. Re:Governments are not concerned... by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They organize to use you for power. You don't even have a choice
      In democracy, there is a difference between feeling like you don't have a choice, and not having a choice. Most people are too lazy to change things, that's the problem. True leaders, that have a vision, who can organize, and influence change are few and far between, most people just follow. Why do we still give favored nation status to China? It's because most average people prefer to save a few bucks on a DVD player than worry about the faceless victims. If the people don't care (60% voter turnout), then of course goverment will remain in control.
      Let me put it this way, your money (stamped with the very face of the kings that made the rules your life) has always been taken out of your hardworking hands and given to some bastard at the top to buy polo ponies
      Because of course nobody at the top actually worked their way up there. Once again most people are too lazy and shortsighted to do the kind of hard work and risk taking required to become successful.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    6. Re:Governments are not concerned... by prurientknave · · Score: 0

      Bravo! I was under the impression I was the only one with these views.

      The reason things exist as they do is for a simple reason: Societies exist for the common defense of its members. It is, by its very charter an association to commit violence, whether the opposing number are wild animals or other societies is of little consequence. High society exists for the purpose of fleecing low society and is institutionalized in the form of government. They cannot exist without this institutionalization, separation and accumulation of power. This allows them to create two groups just like two nations and they have their own code of ethics, in which many actions we consider immoral are moral.
      In addition it should be evident that it is impossible to remain outside of all society because you will become a target. Since you can't beat them join them. This is the essence of any societal participation. It is not voluntary in the modern legal sense since it is made under duress, but from a survivalist standpoint it is the only rational choice to avoid death.

      From these initial precepts it should be evident that there is no possibility of having a great society on any time scale under any form of enlightened government.

    7. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Stone+Pony · · Score: 1
      The ratio of baby girls to boys in China is a cultural thing exacerbated by government policies. Far from wanting to regulate it, I imagine that the government would be only too happy if the populace allowed nature to take its course in gender selection.

      The "one child" policy creates a huge premium on having a male child. Boys are regarded as preferable to girls for several reasons - not least because they can continue the family line. Quoting from this article, which appeared in Hong Kong newspaper in 1995:

      "The birth of a girl has never been a cause for celebration in China, and stories of peasant farmers drowning new born girls in buckets of water have been commonplace for centuries. Now, however, as a direct result of the one-child policy, the number of baby girls being abandoned, aborted, or dumped on orphanage steps is unprecedented.

      It is impossible to overstate both how crucial the one-child policy is to China's stability and how rigidly it is enforced. Everyone agrees that if the population, already at 1.2 billion, is allowed to grow, the result will be economic collapse, environmental ruin, famine "

      In fact, the Chinese government has tried to get people to place a higher value on baby girls, in an attempt to stave off future social problems resulting from the huge gender imbalance in the population. Here's one example: a quick Google will turn up others. The cultural predisposition towards baby boys, allied to the knowledge that you won't be allowed to "try for a boy" if your first-born happens to be a girl, has to make you think that their efforts are doomed to fail.

    8. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Plugh · · Score: 1
      El Camino said:
      My friend, it is time to learn that all types of governments have one thing in common, and that is that they don't care about you in the slightest. They organize to use you for power. [...] Best to find a way make as much freedom, time, happiness, and peace on your own.

      Hear, Hear!!

      The best way to find freedom and happiness, though, is not on your own -- on your own, you're gonna get run over by the out-of-control machine that is Government. Instead, I strongly suggest joining other people who also believe in Freedom.

      And I'm putting my money where my mouth is: I'm an FSP member.

      Do yourself a favor. Check out the link.

    9. Re:Governments are not concerned... by solomonrex · · Score: 1

      Because Lord knows the governments are run by brain-sucking aliens who seek to oppress us all. It's not like real people we're accusing or anything. It's not as if this poster is immature or anything....

    10. Re:Governments are not concerned... by incom · · Score: 1
      "Because of course nobody at the top actually worked their way up there. Once again most people are too lazy and shortsighted to do the kind of hard work and risk taking required to become successful."
      Out of the truly powerful, a small minority actually had to work thier way up from nothing, the majority are from rich and powerful families. And no, their power isn't genetic. I have alot less problems with a self-made man as a political leader then I do with the current cabal.
      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    11. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because of course nobody at the top actually worked their way up there. Once again most people are too lazy and shortsighted to do the kind of hard work and risk taking required to become successful.

      Wait, so it's hard to get born to a very wealthy and influential business man who gives you a free ride through your entire life?

      That doesn't sound too hard to me. Birth has been going on for a while...

      Well, it's hard work for the mom... but the little brat that's born doesn't have to do jack.

      In fact, it's a whole lot easier for the people with the power to create a system which enriches them in the future, as well as not requiring much effort from them in the future. And that is where we are right now in the U.S.

    12. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can still make every effort to go out and get yourself a pony and fake your way into the country club.

      So your advice is, go join the oppressors, and screw everyone else?

      In China, there's no such avenue.

      Wrong. You join the Communist Party, and become one of the oppressors. Just like here. Orwell's 'some pigs are more equal than others' applies to both.

    13. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we still give favored nation status to China? It's because most average people prefer to save a few bucks on a DVD player than worry about the faceless victims.

      No, it's because Nixon opened up relations with them. Big business liked that a lot and still does. I garuntee you, if we banned Chinese imports tomorrow, there would be no riots on the streets - but the retail industry would be up in arms.

    14. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      You know, I already posted pretty much the same thing I am about to somewhere else, but you made me think about it some more.

      I live in the US. Our government is, in my opinion, a fair representative of the opinions, the desires, and the weaknesses of the general populace. Everyone is telling cynics such as yourself that you should work to improve the government if you don't like it, but I am going to go ahead and disagree with all of those people - you can't change anything. Ever.

      You are absolutely right to be cynical; however, I am not one to believe that politics works the way it does because the people at the top are attempting to exploit everyone else. I work for the State of Nebraska, so let me give you and all the other "oppressed" people some advice: the US government is the way it is because of two things and only two things: unbelievably massive inefficiency, and total, unabashed apathy. Seriously, it goes from the lowest levels of government available (i.e. some low level programmer such as myself) to some of the most influential offices around (Congress).

      I am not making a blanket statement about ALL politicians; as in American society, there are people with genuine ambitions and closely held beliefs who want to make something great out of their life. In general, however, our government is EXACTLY like the general US population - you do whatever you need to do to maintain an adequate life for yourself - you go to work, you do your job, you push all ambition out of your mind completely and forget about your dreams and you just live. And you know what, most people are fine with that.

      We in the US have exactly the government we want, and exactly the one we deserve. You may not like it, and I usually don't, but such is the nature of our lazy society. Do you really think that our government could exist in its form if it wasn't satisfactory to most people? That's freedom for you, right there.

    15. Re:Governments are not concerned... by payndz · · Score: 1
      We need a revolution! Government of the people, by the people, for the people! Bring down the ruling classes! Power to the proletariat!

      Oh, wait. I think that's been tried before...

      (All facetiousness aside, I actually agree with a lot of what the parent poster said. Either I'm getting more and more cynical, or the world is getting more and more horrible. Or both.)

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    16. Re:Governments are not concerned... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1

      This poster just sat through four hours of talks about medicine percentages...

      Trust me, the government is run by brain sucking aliens.

      Immature? How about astute.

    17. Re:Governments are not concerned... by LucBorg · · Score: 1

      Get your facts right please. They have the rule that it is one child per couple. They DO NOT set the ratio of boys to girls and then kill girls who are in "excess" as you so imaginatively say. Parents who believe a boy is more "useful" than a girl do however do this. They are in no way forced to do it. And about the policy itself, although it is another limitation on life, without the policy the country would be completely overpopulated, famine would have prevailed for years, and the economy would have been in tatters. Currently, the economy is extremely strong, and growing at 7% and higher. This system may not work for the US or Germany, but it is what suits China. Do not assume that because one form of government works in one country, it will work universally. With regards to protests etc, every government system has people who oppose it. There are pro-democracy people in China as there are Communists, Klu Klux Klan, and (neo)Nazi people etc in America. Sheer misery? You yourself say you have not been to China. Have you lived in a village or town in China? How do you know if it "sheer misery" to live there? The communists are in power for a reason - they were popular when the revolution occured, as high society exploited the poor. They are still popular now. When the Chinese people decide that communism is not good for them, when they rise up and protest, then you can sit there and say "its sheer misery, communism sux, democracy is the best!!!oneone" If everyone has had enough of communism, then not all of them can be imprisoned or executed, so revolution is always possible - French, American and Russian revolutions (twice) springs to mind.

    18. Re:Governments are not concerned... by servognome · · Score: 1

      And no, their power isn't genetic.
      No it's not genetic, but it's also not just handed to them, it's learned. Just like the children of a business owner learn how to start a business, while most people wouldn't even know where to start; the children of policians, learn politics. Unfortunately most of the masses don't educate themselves, which is the greatest tragedy. Though it's more difficult for somebody who doesn't come from a wealthy background, the opportunity is there.
      How many people actually participate in goverment at the local level? At that level you can make a difference despite what corporations want, but most of the time people don't care. So usually it ends up being a couple loudmouths with their own agenda who make the rules for the apathetic masses, and this bubbles up to national level.
      If you were a politician who would you listen to most? The 50% who said nothing, the 25% who voted against you, the 20% who voted for you, or the 5% who actively participated in getting you elected. That is why a small minority get their agenda across, not just the money contributers, but the people who were leaders and went out and organized a group of people behind you. There is a reason certain groups like the christian coalition have so much power. It isn't money, its the fact that their leadership can mobilize a large group of sheep behind a specific candidate. There is one thing politicians listen to more than money, and that's votes.
      Goverment is not inherently evil, people are victims of their own apathy.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    19. Re:Governments are not concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree, amazing how many ppl post in slashdot who just rush to conclusion without making any homework.

      nowadays, ppl in china are able to have more than one child. the regulation didn't say 2nd child is nto allow, there is only a fine for doing so. as the population gets more wealthy, they are able to pay for the fine and live with more than one children.

  41. Nothing to worry about there... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...the last I heard the Chinese government is still busy pretending that the HIV Virus doesn't exist. It's a great population control mechanism.

    No matter where you go, people want to put parts of themselves into other people, as often as possible. If you have and keep a population largely uneducated about reproductive health and safety, it is entirely possible that a vast number of them will get infected.

    Without treatment, it is likely that those infected people will die within ten years. Bam, there goes your population control problem.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1
      Yeah, since the culture encourages parents to make sure their one child has a penis there's become a pretty wide gap in the male/female population, considering the most likely people to get aids would be prostitutes and their customers it's a great way to restore the population balance.

      Sometimes the truth hurts.

    2. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, it isn't really true that Chinese citizens are only allowed to have one child. For a short time, I dated a Chinese national who was enrolled in a US College.

      She is the youngest child of 6 children. Her family spent most of its 'growing up years' in a farming community, although most of her brothers and sisters, as well as herself, have ended up obtaining rather advance college degrees.

      I was a little taken aback when she said she had 5 brothers and sisters and I asked her about the one child law. She mentioned that wasn't necesarily true. It's encouraged, but not set in law where the government will break down your door for having more then one child and take you off to labor camps. That's mostly US propaganda.

      Of course, she had several Chinese propagandist ideas about life in the US. It was pretty fun working through those things, while it lasted.

      --
      If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    3. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      From what I've learned, the one child law isn't really enforced in 'farming communities' and the like, but IS enforced in the cities.

    4. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      It depends on your ethnic group, what province you live in, and what your occupation is. Since mostly it is Han that live in cities and live with an industrialized lifestyle, SirTalon is essentially correct.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    5. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      "China
      Female infanticide has existed in China for a long time, and although the One Child per Family policy has added to the problem, it didn't cause it.

      The One Child Policy was introduced by the Chinese Government in 1979 with the intention of keeping the population within sustainable limits even in the face of natural disasters and poor harvests, and improving the quality of life for the Chinese population as a whole.

      Under the policy, parents who have more than one child may have their wages reduced and be denied some social services.

      Despite the egalitarian nature of Chinese society, many parents believe that having a son is a vital element of providing for their old age. Therefore in extreme cases, a baby is killed if it is not of the preferred sex, because of the pressure not to have more than one child."

      That is from the BBC. Are you going to tell me they have a US Bias?

    6. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      You just supported (unintentionally I believe) the post you replied to. The original poster said that the one child policy was exaggerated in the states to the point that people believed it was a strictly and uniformly enforced law, leading to slaughter of girl babies so that families could have children.

      Your quote mentions that a) it's a policy not a law, b) enforcement is selective, c) it didn't create the problem of female infanticide.

      So your point?

    7. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Laws and policies are the same thing in china, otherwise their wages would not be reduced and the problem of killing female babies is easy to see, just look at the under 40 demographic numbers. There are a lot more males then females in china and this is becomming a serious problem.

      Perhaps you should be the one who need to research the issue.

    8. Re:Nothing to worry about there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, China's excess male/female ratio is not a problem. It's a very good symptom in a country with over a billion people and rising economic consumption.

      The cause of the ratio, infanticide, is obviously bad, but its secondary effect is not.

  42. RTA by opaqueice · · Score: 1
    From the article:


    Among the 50 illegal games, 26 are pirated game software including Age of Mythology: the Titans, The Sims 2, Manhunt, FIFA 2005, Battlefield Vietnam and Painkiller: Battle out of Hell. The remaining are illegally distributed foreign games including Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation.


    It's quite clear from the text that they are NOT banning these games because of some political agenda (at least not the 26 games in the first category). They're not banning the games at all, per se. They're just banning the sale of some widely distributed illegal copies. Having been in China recently, I can tell you that it's easy to purchase pirated software (even in relatively large stores), and they are try to crack down (or at least make it look that way).

    1. Re:RTA by Trillan · · Score: 1

      The question is -- can you buy The Sims 2 in China legally? Most people here seem to think you can't, which makes all copies pirated.

    2. Re:RTA by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      You can't "ban" a pirated game -- which would already be theoretically illegal -- by title unless there are no legal copies of the game in the country at all. Age of Mythology in China is illegal, hence any copy of it must be pirated.

      This is absolutely politically motivated -- did you read the "create a good environment for Chinese youth" and "electronic publications and illegal journals that will have negative influence on the youth" lines? -- and should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone who knows anything about China. Like the article itself says, China has been censoring publications it disagreed with for 16 years.

      You've been to China, so you've seen how much pirated software there is. Do you really think banning 50 games by title is an effective way to combat that? They aren't saying "crack down on pirated software" they are saying "confiscate these games if you see them anywhere".

      But apparently China has taken to given their censorship the thinnest window dressing of "combating piracy" for the West's sake, and the West is eating it up.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  43. Re:Get a hint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT. YHL. HAND.

  44. On the other hand by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Well... if women in Sims 2 are allowed to have more than one child, then maybe the Chinese people will start getting ideas"

    Or, if Chinese couples who want more than one child are allowed by the government to have as many Sim children as they want, this could defuse the issue.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:On the other hand by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Or, if Chinese couples who want more than one child are allowed by the government to have as many Sim children as they want, this could defuse the issue.

      No No No! Having many Sim children would desensitize the user to having multiple children. Multiphiles would engage and expand their fantasies, leading some of them to cross a threshold and act out in real life.

      We cannot allow video games to promote multiphilia!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  45. Command and Conquer... by Sheepdot · · Score: 4, Informative
    From Wired:
    And in early 2003, the same agency banned the Electronic Arts-produced title Command and Conquer Generals: Zero Hour Expansion for "smearing the image of China and the Chinese army," according to the state news agency.

    While I understand that Command and Conquer and it's sequels/expansions could easily be seen as portraying China in a negative light, the premise of the "Generals" series is hardly anti-Chinese:

    1. What is Generals' story?

    EA Pacific have created a brand new storyline, units and tactics that have all been inspired by the technologies and ideologies of today's tumultuous world. Generals spans between present day and 20 years into the future, and offers up a metaphor for today's version of global warfare. Three very different sides are fighting for supremacy, the superpowers of the United States and China, along with an umbrella terror organization, the GLA. Each employs very different tactics in their war efforts. For example, the United States places a great deal of importance on human life, and thus has a small, but very capable, ground force among its weaponry. The Chinese, on the other hand, has a massive, swarming army that uses their numbers to their advantage. China also has an affinity for fire and uses it in much of its weaponry. Finally, the GLA relies on sneaky tactics and being hard to find... thus hard to kill.

    2. How about a more detailed story overview?

    Set roughly 20 years into our future, China is no longer governed by old communist beliefs and cold war mentality. While still communist, the new Chinese government are people that grew up on modern culture and things like MTV. These new leaders strive to make China a mainstream world power and part of the G8. The GLA, an umbrella terrorist organization, is stepping up its assaults on the Chinese borders and terrorist attacks inside China. Bent on proving their world super power status, China sets out to combat the GLA in a war against terror. To spite more countries, GLA launched a nuclear strike against Europe and the United States of America. While Europe was hit by the nuclear strike, the USA managed to intercept the missiles and now they have launched their own campaign against the GLA, to eradicate the terrorist organization.


    Anti-communist, maybe, but anti-Chinese, certainly not. Perhaps they were "smearing" the dreams of some political leaders? This came from Planet C&C, by the way.
    1. Re:Command and Conquer... by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      While I understand that Command and Conquer and it's sequels/expansions could easily be seen as portraying China in a negative light, the premise of the "Generals" series is hardly anti-Chinese:
      Even if it isn't anti-Chinese, it's extremely easy assume otherwise. Most of the claims of racism seem to stem from stereotypical nature of the game, including both units and the voice acting. As an example, some voices from the Worker indicate that there's a limited grasp of english - which is more significant than a simple accent.

      The expansion pack Zero Hour, given some plot discontinuities within itself and the original campaign, feels a little like damage control to try an give the Chinese a happy ending. (e.g. USA got attacked and retaliated, but when they got attacked again, they pulled back and strengthened homeland security.)

      Oddly enough, it didn't seem to be noticable with Red Alert or Red Alert 2. It could be that the accent was used to indiate the faction rather than produce character - which is enough of a different to matter.

      2. How about a more detailed story overview?

      Set roughly 20 years into our future, China is no longer governed by old communist beliefs and cold war mentality. While still communist, the new Chinese government are people that grew up on modern culture and things like MTV.
      This could be a trigger for China banning the game, and does sound plausable. However, China's official explaination also sounds plausable, turning it into a word-vs-word description. You can guess who won.

      There could have been ways to make the Chinese government look a little worse for banning the game without reason (or at least deflected the banning to banned games rather than legit games.) However, it feels like EA Pacific was a bit too careless in creating the faction, thus creating an anti-Chinese impression.

    2. Re:Command and Conquer... by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

      Actually, if I remember correctly, the government banned the game because it had a cutscene where Tiananmen Square was blown up.

    3. Re:Command and Conquer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the new Chinese government are people that grew up on modern culture and things like MTV

      That would explain the "Propaganda Towers"

    4. Re:Command and Conquer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is exactly why Westwood Studios did C&C FAR better. Sure Tiberian Sun kind of wasn't so great, but it was hampered more by the "it's been in devlopment far too long" problem.

    5. Re:Command and Conquer... by detritus. · · Score: 1

      EA Pacific have created a brand new storyline, [..] that have all been inspired by the technologies and ideologies of today's tumultuous world.

      A few headlines about the US government accusing the chinese government of planning to use hackers for cyberwarfare is hardly inspiration for a story depicting "real world" events. The people who designed the plot behind C&C Generals did nothing but regurgitate US news headlines to make the plot of this game. C&C Generals' China forces makes money by hackers who sit on mobile laptops by breaking into financial institutions. It's about as assinine if the game designers decided to make an Iraqi force instead, who has "weapons of mass destruction". I can understand why China is pissed.

      In addition, when clicking on some of the US units that you wish to command in the game, they say phrases like "Preserving Freedom" and "Doing the right thing". Through the press, the US government has made what is truly a religious war, a war about fighting for freedom. Bush has said time and time again about how these terrorists "hate freedom" and "what america stands for."

      I, for one, was quite offended by those aspects of the game.
      Especially being that the target audience is young people who probably don't follow the real-world events in-depth, the story is really a work of pure fiction, coated to be based on "real world events". Whether or not the game has had any effect on shaping the opinions on world "events", of its young players, the messages "doing the right thing" being played over and over again has to make you wonder.

    6. Re:Command and Conquer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In addition, when clicking on some of the US units that you wish to command in the game, they say phrases like "Preserving Freedom" and "Doing the right thing". Through the press, the US government has made what is truly a religious war, a war about fighting for freedom. Bush has said time and time again about how these terrorists "hate freedom" and "what america stands for."

      That gives character to the American soldiers, but it's in no way propaganda. If Nazis in Wolfenstein or something say "Glory to the Third Reich!", is that Nazi propaganda? You should distinguish between what the game itself says and what characters inside it say.

  46. Screenshots from Banned Games by pixelatedsoul · · Score: 1

    Was this screenshot from one of the banned games? :)

    1. Re:Screenshots from Banned Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Sims 2 Regime Protest Expansion Pack.

  47. 26 banned before import so they must be pirated by clusterix · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is the way I sorta understand the article/spin. They made a list of 50 games for their people to look for. The list includes 26 that were never imported officially (most likely not allowed due to censorship). The other 24 were imported and sold before being found containing thoughts that might pervert Chinese society.

  48. those "evil" chinese. by racerxroot · · Score: 1

    Yea, the headline here on Slashdot seems like it tries to make the Chinese into bookburning Nazis. But I dunno, all they're doing is flat out telling people that this is illegal and they're going to stop it. Now, if in a week they turn around and ban a game because it includes Taiwan (im thinking of the right country aren't i?) then yea, they're being jerks. But until then -- we should stop trying to criticize people when they're doing the right thing.

    --
    --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
    1. Re:those "evil" chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes let's not criticize people who are doing the "right" thing by banning games such as FIFA 2005. RTFA idiot.

  49. It's business, stupid! by taweili · · Score: 1

    Please list this under Business instead of Right. Chinese government only control 1% of the game distribution. The other 99% is illegal pirate which government has no control over. If you look at the titles banned in the list:

    1. EA: FIFA 2005, Sim 2, Battlefield Vietnam,
    2. Microsoft: Age of Mythology

    I am sure must of the reminding games are from major publishers. China use the ban as a leverage with the foreigner companies. It happened before that cnn.com, abc.com and other US medias are banned in China. Ban on CNN.com is left after they agree to carry CCTV contents in the US. It's business, stupid!

  50. Way, to go, /. by mrn121 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In a related story: Slashdot's credibility dropped another ten points today by means of yet another over-zealous printing of a story with little actual content.

    If you read the actual article, you will see, as many astute readers have pointed out, that this is an issue of China attempting to crack down on video game piracy, not ban games because they are evil communists.

    It is my opinion that recently slashdot has started down the slippery slope of becoming what I despise about big time news agencies: a marketplace for sensationalized stories. Every dramatic article posted on /. recently ends up being far less dramatic upon further investigation. I used to love slashdot for the lack of glitzy CNN-esque flash headlines of empty news articles, now slashdot is becoming exactly that.

    And don't give me that "well it's the readers who submit articles, so don't blame slashdot, blame the readers" crap. We all know how hard it is to get an article posted on the front page, and we all know that there are tons of articles submitted and only a few chosen by a handful of people who have their own ideologies/agendas. The only difference with having users submit the articles at this point is that the moderators don't have to dig up the articles themselves.

    If trends continue along these lines, I think my days of reading slashdot are numbered. I can read sensationalized news anywhere (CNN, FOXNews, ABC, CBS, NBC etc). I come here for the in-depth, interesting, non-glamorous, I-might-just-learn-something-today news, and I am finding it harder and harder to come across on slashdot.

    Mod this however you want. I might be a troll, but I feel like it needed to be said.

    1. Re:Way, to go, /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As part of the effort to protect intellectual property rights and create a good environment for Chinese youth, the State GeneralAdministration of Press and Publication (SGAPP) together with the anti-porn and illegal publication offices, created a list of 50 illegal electronic games

      This especially concerns pirated textbooks, electronic publications and illegal journals that will have negative influence on the youth.

      The remaining are illegally distributed foreign games including Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation.

      China, which first launched a campaign against pornographic andillegal publications in 1989, has been carrying it out for 16 years.

      Because you didn't read the article yourself, I have posted the relevant parts here. Notice the sections in bold, which specifically state that some of the banned games were but considered as pornographic or having a bad influence in Chinese youth. That doesn't sound like a simple crackdown on piracy to me.

      Quit bashing and RTFA from time to time.

    2. Re:Way, to go, /. by mrn121 · · Score: 1
      ...some of the banned games were but considered as pornographic or having a bad influence in Chinese youth...

      Right, SOME of the software is banned. China is a communist country. I am not taking their side here, saying that they don't do anything wrong.

      The point that I (succesfully, in my opinion) made is that the headline is the most dramatic part of the news article. 50 GAMES BANNED!!! IT COULDN'T BE!!! Then you read and you see that MOST are illegal pirated copies, and that a handful are actually "banned" as is implied in the title of the slashdot article.

      Was I, or was I not, correct in saying that the title sensationalized the content of the article? Any reasonable person who looked at the headline/blurb would have thought that China banned "The Sims" because of it's capitalist overtones. Reading the article proved otherwise. That is my point.

    3. Re:Way, to go, /. by Mafiew · · Score: 1

      This is CHINA we're talking about. ALL software in China is pirated! Do you think a news story coming from a Chinese newspaper which is run by the government is going to give the real reasons why this software is banned, particularly games related to Vietnam and games that show Taiwan as a separate country? Read between the lines! If you think this is only about piracy then you've know nothing about China.

    4. Re:Way, to go, /. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you read the actual article, you will see, as many astute readers have pointed out, that this is an issue of China attempting to crack down on video game piracy, not ban games because they are evil communists.

      Uh, if you read the actual article, you will see that they are cracking down on video game piracy of games that are pirated because the government wouldn't let them be legally sold in the country. It is an issue of censorship. They aren't cracking down on piracy when the same thing was otherwise available legally. They are cracking down on games banned by the government, and asserting that any copies in the country must be illegal coppies. They are changing it to a "piracy" issue to cloud the fact that they censored them in the first place.

    5. Re:Way, to go, /. by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      and what are your alternatives to slashdot? really?

    6. Re:Way, to go, /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure.... and i guess letting cops use drug sniffing dogs during a routine traffic stop shouldn`t be cause for concern...or fingerprinting on traffic tickets... http://www.wbay.com/Global/story.asp?s=2776926
      sh ould be anything to worry about. right?

    7. Re:Way, to go, /. by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      If you'd like to get rid of most of the pointless reactionary sensationized stories, go into your preferences and disable the showing of any "Your Rights Online" story. Or pretty much any story posted by Timothy.

  51. What you tse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (continued) Cats: All your Tibet are belong to us.

  52. What about *MY* game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a simple, two-person shooter that I affectionately call "Shoot the Gook".

    Would it be banned?

    Unless needed for help violating human rights, these people are only good for target practice.

    1. Re:What about *MY* game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it recognize Taiwan as a separate country?

  53. Grand, beautiful comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you very much, Sir. I copied it to my Palm to read it again occasionally.

  54. The youth will have to do something constructive.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... like hump some of the 100 million hookers that the Chinese government says don't exist.

    Bottom line - It's almost impossible to find a legal copy of a game in China. But you can buy an illegal copy of any game you want anywhere you look for about 1 US dollar. The ban list is foriegn relations and no youth in China will notice it.

  55. Re:Get a hint by nicholasharbour · · Score: 2, Funny

    and who frequently hop into a bed for pixelated "woo-hoo" -- the latter of which oughta be grounds for a ban in any civilized nation.

    [sarcasm]
    You are right on the money! civilized people shouldn't be having sex and the more we can cover it up the better! Sex will be the downfall of civilization and the thought of pixelated "woo-hoo" just makes me want to stab somebody in the face.
    [/sarcasm]

    --

    Nearly half of all people are below average
  56. Next on the ban list by adeydas · · Score: 1

    Next on the ban list are Mario and Dave.

  57. Stupid Chinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to just realize that it's only a fucking game, and quit trying to oppress the people.

    1. Re:Stupid Chinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You certainly do seem to have a high regard for "the people", judging by your subject.

  58. People, R (and understand) TFA! by 10537 · · Score: 1

    Unless whoever translated it in to English got hopelessly confused, they are cracking down on pirated/illegally imported titles and not banning the games outright. The list probably covers the most popular titles falling in to these categories; presumably if they spot Sims 2 it's more likely than not an illicit copy and worthy of further scrutiny.

    In other words, they're doing nothing that would be considered unusual in the US or Europe.

    --
    This sentence no verb.
  59. "dream" marketing campaign by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Every parent knows there no more sure way to convince a teenager to do something than to prohibit it. China's campaign will encourage many of the young men hanging out at the computer cafes to acquire and play these banned games.

  60. Banning? by McFadden · · Score: 1

    It's pretty tough to decode the somewhat cryptic statement, but my reading would be as follows:

    Games like FIFA 2005 and the other 25 on the list are not officially distributed in China, and the only copies that get into the county are illegal pirated versions. Therefore they've been (justifiably) outlawed.

    The other games are being illegally distributed (for whatever reason, one would assume companies distributing games need some kind of license or authorization - perhaps an age rating) and are also being banned.

    However, since the statement itself is not really clear, I doubt any of us can claim to have an authoritative insight into exactly what is going on.

  61. History Lesson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be Taiwan. This should be common knowledge (at least for a US citizen).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

    Check out the political status section in the wiki.

    Basically the losers of the Chinese civil war retreated to Taiwan and set up shop, so mainland China sees Taiwan as illegitimate - they just haven't gotten around to taking it back yet.

    The reason this is so important to know is Taiwan is a major source of tension between the US and China. This is of course due to the fact that the US is/has been arming them. Not arming in the sense of giving them guns; rather arming them with sovereign country grade weapons systems. Taiwan has a world class functioning Army, Navy and Air force - thanks in large part to the USA.

    The censorship of western content that recognizes Taiwan is an attempt to prevent the legitimizing of Taiwan in both the minds of the mainland Chinese and those in Taiwan.

    1. Re:History Lesson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know all that idiot, but Taiwan has no team in FIFA, thus my question. You wanted to be so quick to point out my ignorance that you displayed your own, by assuming Taiwan has an official team in FIFA, which it does not. Now you're an idiot!!!

  62. Pity by pklong · · Score: 1

    Pits they didn't ban the sale and distribution of these games:

    Freecell
    Minesweeper
    3D Pinball
    Solitare

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  63. FIFA 2005? by cyriustek · · Score: 1

    They are banning FIFA 2005 as well? Perhaps they are truly understanding that soccer is a violent as the vietnam war. ;-) (Toungue in cheek)

  64. They Forgot by u16084 · · Score: 1

    They forgot to ban Computers.. and the internet. oH WAIT, you can no longer breathe AIR, thats imported also.

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    1. Re:They Forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poland

  65. Re:FIFA 2005 & Whats Next by Jozone · · Score: 1

    I would hope that if they are going to censor their people, they would also prevent them from playing games like DAIKATANA... ooohhh the crappyness.

  66. You're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Polo ponies don't exist, and have never existed! I'm sure of it. They only use full size horses.
    Me

  67. piracy is illegal, but nobody cares by koi88 · · Score: 1


    What *I* don't get is why they're illegalizing games that are "pirated". What does that mean? They saw a guy selling pirated copies of FIFA on the street, so then they're blocking imports of that game entirely?

    This is China. On every corner someone approaches you an tries to sell pirated DVDs, games, etc.
    Police seems to ignore that.
    Now if they see a guy selling copies of an illegal game I'm afraid, this guy might soon stand on a corner in Inner Mongolia (with other problems than selling illegal DVDs)

    Copyright violation is no big issue in China. Selling potentially government-critical stuff is.

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  68. Mod parent up by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

    Amen. There is way too much teenage carping about "stuff costs money, everything should be free" on Slashdot. Get over it. Get a job. Pay for the stuff you want. This is not the *AA asking for copyrights to be extended to (forever-1day), this is software companies making legitimate products and asking to get paid for them, in the first few years after creation. Entirely reasonable. Come on guys, how many of you want to be software developers? How many of you want to get paid enough that you can move out of your parents' basement? How do you expect to do that if the going rate for sales of your primary skill is zero dollars? You aren't going to make it up on volume...

  69. Only 50? by cno3 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they need to take a cue from Matt Blunt, who not only steals elections, but banned all video games, (which he calls "[an] often violent style of entertainment",) from Missouri's prisons because video games apparently make one socially retarded.

    This is after the violent video games had been removed from the correctional facilities - a move similar to the modest steps taken by the SGAPP.

  70. Re:Get a hint by stinerman · · Score: 1

    I need sarcasm tags ... help!!!

  71. That's what they want it to "sound like" by ianscot · · Score: 1
    That's a nice front for what's going on, but consider the Chinese market, rife with piracy as it supposedly is, and consider that even some of the seemingly innocent titles on this list -- FIFA 2005, for the sake of Pete? -- have a little touch of sting for the Beijing regime.

    FIFA, for example, includes a Taiwanese team. The Vietnam games are going to reflect a non-sanctioned view of the war. And so on.

    Censorship for reasons of political manipulation masquerading as something else? the heck you say! (I'd throw stones, but then I listened to Howard Stern once last year when he was laying into Bush and company.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  72. Why?? by rodrigogo · · Score: 1

    What on earth is wrong with Fifa 2005??

  73. Hang on... by cjrichard · · Score: 1

    You can't get games like FIFA or The Sims in China? Aren't they missing out on an incredibly lucrative market? I'm especially surprised at EA, they have shown themselves to be money-grabbing scumbags at the best of times.

  74. Illegal restraint of trade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, it's time to retaliate against abusive trading "partners" like India and China.

    They go and subsidize things like "high tech" and "manufacturinig" then shove it down our throats. The working Moms and Dads of America can't compete against state subsidies, massive pollution, state run healthcare, slave labor and employer friendly guest worker programs.

    It's time to manage this nonsense for the benefits of American citizens.

  75. Dupe! by MrHanky · · Score: 1

    Jeezuz, it's bad enough that the Slashdot editors repost old stories, now the readers start doing the same. What's the world coming to?

    (Only kidding, Ogman; I just don't want the editors to make a story out of your comment, in case they should bother reading the comment section. And it's quite likely that they read the comments, since they rarely seem to read the frontpage.)

    1. Re:Dupe! by Ogman · · Score: 1

      Mr. Hanky - Understood. Actually, I was just thinking the same thing. I hadn't seen the original slashdot post, though, thanks for pointing that out.

      --
      But Officer, I DID read the f**king article!
  76. I don't get it. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Some people have pointed out that China is banning these games because they are often pirated games, not because of any political agenda.

    That still doesn't make sense to me. If you ban The Sims 2 outright, wouldn't that mean that EVERYONE in China that wants to play that game will have to pirate it? Sure, it was probably widely pirated before, but now the Chinese will have no other choice but get a pirated copy if they want to play it, since the option to buy a legitimate copy at a store is now gone. And you know they're not going to just stop playing it because it was illegal, pirated copies of games are illegal, too, but that doesn't stop that, does it?

    By doing this, China is not cracking down on pirated copies of these games- they are instead cracking down on legit copies of these games because those are the only copies that they can accurately track. People will still play these games either way.

  77. Game Programmers' Paradise by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a great VCD published by the Chinese government documenting their China/Vietnam war. After the US finally completely pulled out of Vietnam in 1975 (under Donald "Surrender Monkey" Rumsfeld), China turned on the Vietnamese Communists they had backed in the war against the US. And became the last in a long line of imperial losers trying to defeat the Vietnamese. (Betcha never heard of that dirty little chapter in the International Workers Paradise brotherhood.)

    The VCD is entirely first-person movies of actual military action, shot by China from their troops, and some captured from Vietnamese troops who shot their own footage. It's black and white, but full of action and fast cuts, along with subtitles in Vietnamese and (I guess) Han and Cantonese Chinese, over pair of Vietnamese and (I guess) Mandarin narration voiceovers. It all flies by so fast that I want to slow it down, which would stretch its hour into at least two, an epic on a war both hidden in the West, and doubtlessly fictionalized in the East. It looks like a trove of material to illustrate a historical game, even if crudely integrated with overlaid interactive game graphics. And I doubt it could represent that tawdry little commentary on Communism any less accurately does than its Chinese propaganda version. Plus, I'd expect its inevitable banning by the Chinese mafia government to spur its underground popularity in the vast Chinese market. Who's with me?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Game Programmers' Paradise by 808140 · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure about this, but I was under the impression that the Chinese and the Vietnamese came to blows over the new Vietnamese government's abuse of their sizeable ethnic Chinese population. This, at least, is the reason given in China (which says nothing about its veracity).

      It is true that the Vietnamese were abusive of their Chinese population, though, to the point where most eventually fled Vietnam. What isn't clear is whether that was the real reason that China engaged them.

      What you should consider though, is that because of the so-called Sino-Soviet split, China entered into ideological conflict with the Soviet Union in the 1960s. Essentially, while Stalin was alive, he was considered the undisputed leader of the world communist movement by everyone who mattered (I don't consider Trotsky to matter in this case). When he died, Mao believed that he should have ideological seniority over Nikita Krushchev, Stalin's successor. The USSR disagreed and as a result, China began to drift away from the USSR -- in fact, they were convinced that there would eventually be war. As a result, China began to court the United States, which culminated in Nixon's voyage to China.

      Around this time, China stopped supporting the North Vietnamese in their war against the US. They did this not only because of warming relations with the US, but also (in fact mostly) because the North Vietnamese sided idealistically with the Soviet Union.

      Some historians (western, mostly) seem to think that China's brief skirmish with Vietnam was in fact to test the Soviet Union's mettle -- they had pledged to support the Viet Cong against any aggressor. Supporters of this theory point out that the Chinese entered Vietnam, and then withdrew quickly -- the whole thing was over in less than a month.

      There's also the Cambodia theory. Historically, the Khmer Rouge and China had enjoyed good relations, largely because that regime followed the doctrines of Maoism (a form of communism concentrating on a rural peasant revolution instead of an urban worker's revolt). A problem here is that once Pol Pot emerged as Cambodia's dictator, their relations apparently deteriorated somewhat. At any rate, the Cambodians began killing ethnic Vietnamese in Cambodia wholesale (it was a pretty bloody regime in general), and also engaging in guerilla tactics on the Vietnamese border. Finally, in 1978, the Vietnamese had enough, and invaded Cambodia, ending the Khmer Rouge regime. The Chinese entered Vietname in Februrary 1979 so the timing might not be coincidental -- it's possible that the Chinese were retaliating in lieu of the Khmer Rouge, who had previously been their allies.

      Who knows.

      As for your mention of "Chinese propaganda", the truth is that the conflict is rarely spoken of. Nowadays, Vietnam and China have mostly gotten over the conflict (it took until the 1990s). Because it's such a recent thing, I think neither nation wants to talk about it too much -- trade is too beneficial to both nations. Both maintain that they won the conflict, and no one in the west really knows what the truth is, because no one is really clear on what China's motivation was.

      One thing is for certain, though, the truth is much more complex than you're making out.

      I agree that a war game set during this battle -- in fact, a war game from the perspective of any of the communist countries -- would be quite interesting, as long as it attempted to remain reasonably true to history, and not indulge in western propaganda, which is, believe it or not, just as bad and twisted its communist counterpart (although arguably more subtle).

    2. Re:Game Programmers' Paradise by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Actually, the truth of these battles is complex - very complex - only when evaluating it in the terms of the propagandists. The simple truth is that Stalin succeeded the Russian czar after his Communists changed dynasties and structure (appointment instead of heredity) as emperor of the Russian Empire, and expanded it while dropping its international obligations. Stalin produced a powerful, agressive state, whose foreign policy offered assistance to other states willing to join his hegemony, even through revolution. Mao, in turn, succeeded the Chinese emperor and repeated the pattern, though his hegemony was turned inwards to unite a huger country, rather than outwards. Mao took Stalin up on his alliance offers, especially appropriate while defending from the Japanese to the Russians' Germans. When Vietnam finally got the weapons it needed to throw out their own Western European colonial masters, they came from Russia and China, continuing the pattern. Ho Chi Minh was as independent as were Stalin and Mao, but had a smaller country, so was a more attractive target for takeover by an "ally" who'd helped win the revolution. And with the Sino-Soviet war, Chinese propaganda had already accomodated warfare between soviet "brothers". But Mao underestimated Vietnamese warcraft as much as had the Americans and the French. When Mao's Vietnamese invasion didn't just crush the wily Vietnamese, he called it off, rather than fight a war on two fronts against other Communists, while also waging ongoing war by proxy in Korea, and his own instance of the Cold War with the US. He folded fast, and China came around to acceptance (and denial of the past) with Vietnam in the interests of China's new import/export strategy in the 1990s.

      So, in short, it's simple: all that warfare was just more of the same Asian annexation conflicts indulged by all the parties whenever possible. The Communist ideology was just propaganda to keep their populations organized under their agenda of war or peace, as appropriate. The only surprise was, as usual, the Vietnamese capacity for strategy and military success. As for the relative propaganda of the West, we're exactly the same, with a different cover story that's not as essential to keeping our people "on track". With more games that perpetuate our own propaganda. Perhaps, if the Vietnam/China war is so threatening to their propaganda, which is more brittle and more necessary to keeping their people "on track", more games that expose it would be a good way to help their young people get off their track of repression. If only it were so easy in the West.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  78. This sounds familiar by iamzack · · Score: 1

    An oppressive regime that censors anything that might go against their agenda. A government known for human rights violations. Definately not a democracy. Iraq? No, China! I guess extremely cheap labor is worth more than cheap oil. I mean, if we bombed China and killed a bunch of people, who would make our fireworks and Wal-Mart clothes?

    BTW, is China still our "Most Favored Nation"? Or was that just a Clinton thing?

    1. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, is China still our "Most Favored Nation"? Or was that just a Clinton thing?

      Actually, very favorable trade agreements (for them anyway) with China go back to Nixon. I'm not 100% sure that they were given "most favored trading partner status" by Nixon, but I am sure it predated Cliton. Of course, he didn't change the status quo in that case either....

    2. Re:This sounds familiar by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      "Most Favored Nation" is just a diplomatic term meaning something like "Normal Trade Relations."

      Meaning that tariffs on the country's goods are equal to the lowest="most favored" terms of any other trading partner.

      Nothing about it expresses special treatment.

  79. Playing to lose? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The Chinese mafia government is pretty tough - they hanged 27 Windows pirates in the mid-1990s to appease some mid-bubble ranting from the West Coast, among uncounted other onslaughts against humans in the name of property. But they're up against a population pushing 2 billion people, many now grasping for slippery virtual property. Won't these draconian interventions just create more value adds for the Chinese piracy and gaming undergrounds? Won't they be outleveraging themselves out of credibility as a government, especially in the eyes of their most productive segment, computerized kids? Putting this repression on a group of fanatical people armed with paychecks, globally competitive skills and culture, and decentralized telecommunications, not to mention a taste for violence, seems a strategy that courts defeat in the long run.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  80. Hypocrites by enigmals1 · · Score: 0

    This from a country that sends the world the majority of spam (2nd being Japan) and eats their own babies.

    1. Re:Hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about?

      Eating babies? Are you out of your mind? Are you saying, for instance, that Hu Jintao or Jiang Zemin has eaten a baby? Or are you talking about some large fraction of a billion people? When? What documentation do you have? There's *plenty* about the current PRC regime to complain about without this kind of sweeping racist flamebait.

      As for spam, the ultimate source is almost certainly domestic. Whether the IP addresses are forged to correspond to Chinese addresses, or bounced off an unsecured relay, the source is the people actually trying to sell penis enlargements and herbal viagra, not the people who own the hijacked machines.

    2. Re:Hypocrites by enigmals1 · · Score: 0

      As for the baby comment... sorry... I believe you'd call them fetuses.

      As for the spam...dude, you SERIOUSLY need to do some homework...shoot just do a friggen search about spam on goole or something. It's common knowledge (except you you I guess) that most originate from Asia (and most virii from Germany). Welcome to last year.

    3. Re:Hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for the now-revised fetus comment, do you have any documentation for your accusation?

      And learn English "dude" baby != fetus.

    4. Re:Hypocrites by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as you don't get your facts from right-wing religious sites, it looks like the fetus-eating rumor was based on *one* performance artist claiming something provocative.

      Which you use to libel a billion people. Way to go!

    5. Re:Hypocrites by enigmals1 · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, have you been there? Or are you just parroting what you read on some sites that tried to make people feel better? It's not rumors, man.

      By the way, it's friggen /. I don't need facts. All opinions welcome, just not accepted. ;) Just like baby != fetus That is an opinion and cannot be proved scientifically one way or other, otherwise there'd be no debate over abortion.

      It's my opinion folks!! I know all about the rumor/hoax sites, however, whatever you think a fetus is, the Chinese (Taiwanese and a few others) DO consume fetuses in certain areas. Now granted it's not the majority so one could also say some strange stuff about Americans, BUT they do it within their law and the government is representative of a people. Go over there... go to the local "gourmet" cafés...then tell me all about the rumor/hoax sites. "Baby" or not, it's still nasty, and it does happen over there more frequently than you'd ever want to know.

    6. Re:Hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fiancee is Taiwanese; let me assure you that your opinion is racist bullshit, plain and simple.

      And my opinion is that right-wing Christians eat 12-year-old girls. I'll save time by telling you my definition of "girls" is what in English is called "Scotch whisky."

    7. Re:Hypocrites by enigmals1 · · Score: 0

      Well, you're entitled to your opinion. ;)

  81. China New Axis of Evil by gigem4me · · Score: 1

    China is the new Axis of Evil. They kill Christians, ban good video games. And the whole dang country is going to hell.

  82. Polo itself doesn't exist by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's a bunch of horse-hockey.

  83. Swedish War Games... by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    >>the developers are Swedish not American

    Arn't the Swedes supposed to me neutral? It would kill the game somewhat if you only had the option to play as Sweden, all you could do is watch, (unless you wanted to play at transporting enamy troops to Norway by train).

    At least if you played Switzland you could get to pick a couple of weapons (small Swiss Army knife, Swiss Army knife with compass, Swiss army knife with wood saw etc.)

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:Swedish War Games... by rogueuk · · Score: 1

      Actually the Swiss probably have one of the highest guns to people ratio in Europe. They have a huge militia system and during the Cold War they had one of the largest land based armies in Europe. I think they still have a system where all men are conscripted and remain part of the army reserves until middle age.

    2. Re:Swedish War Games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We thank our American friend for posting this response, but do note that the Swedes are not Swiss!

    3. Re:Swedish War Games... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      We thank our anonymous cowardly friend for posting this response, but do note that he said:

      >At least if you played Switzerland you could get to pick a couple of weapons

      We thank you for your submission, but we regret to inform you that your post does not meet our current needs.

      Thank you.

  84. It's not Xinhau by magefile · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's Xinhua.

  85. This is not about piracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This has nothign to do with piracy. The reason all of that software is being pirated in the country is because the government either A) revied it and found it 'unfit for the minds of youth' or B) havent reviewed it because the publishers already know it wont get approved. This is about censorship plain and simple. If the games could be bought legally they wouldnt need to pirate them as much, Also if the games could be bought legally they would be crakcing down on only pirated copies, not BANNING the games.

  86. wtf, YES, China does ban games. Why defend them? by ayeco · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the RTFA posts. Sure the article does say that China is banning some illegal games, but history proves that China bans games and open discussion at will:
    Football
    Hearts of Iron
    General BBC article

  87. Very VERY wrong summary by northcat · · Score: 5, Informative
    China did NOT ban The Sims 2 and FIFA 2005. Please, AT LEAST the editors should RTFA. The news item reports two things:
    1. Pirated copies of the following games are banned: Age of Mythology: the Titans, The Sims 2, Manhunt, FIFA 2005, Battlefield Vietnam and Painkiller: Battle out of Hell. PIRATED copies. Much to the delight of the makers of those games. They can still be legally sold and obtained in China.
    2. These games were illegal in China (they weren't allowed to be sold -- banned): Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation. But, presumably, people sold them anyway and therefore they have been banned. Let me repeat, only the following games have been completely banned from China: Conflict Vietnam, Vietcong: Fist Alpha and Devastation.
    First slashdot reports an urban legend as true and now this.
    <ranting about how incompetent news posters are and how careless slashdot editors have become>
    1. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by northcat · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, on reading the article again, it looks like even the second set of games were NOT banned. No games were banned. Some games were pirated so the pirated copies were banned. And then illegal copies of other games from foriegn countries were being sold so the foriegn copies were banned.

    2. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, AT LEAST the editors should RTFA.

      I think it's pretty obvious the editors stopped giving a damn a long time ago.

    3. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by sulli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keep in mind that the Xinhua story was not altogether clear. It's a translation, so that's not too surprising.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    4. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by d_jedi · · Score: 1

      Then again, they say:
      "The administration has called for relevant departments across the country to clean up the electronic publication and software markets, confiscate any of the 50 games if found and hold the publishers, producers and distributors of these games accountable."

      It doesn't mention pirated versions specifically.. just any copies of those titles.

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
    5. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by brit74 · · Score: 1


      So, pirated games that do not appear in the list ARE legal? What on odd policy. How did that happen? "Pirated copies of Sims 2 are banned. However, pirated copies of Doom 3 will be legal."
      ???

    6. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clearing that up. Nothing seemed to make sense about this story at all. What urban myth did the report as true?

    7. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by northcat · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Very VERY wrong summary by vertinox · · Score: 1

      You forgot Hearts of Iron 1 and 2 http://www.paradoxplaza.com/heartsofiron2.asp

      It was mostly over the fact of the Nationalist Chinese see as a different country than Communist China.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  88. YOU LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    When our lawmakers do it, it's for the freedom and security of our children.

    What games have our lawmakers banned?

    What? None? I thought so.

    Now that I've utterly destroyed your idiotic post, I hope the moderators will mod this tripe down.

    1. Re:YOU LIE by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Troll?

      If you're gonna mod him down, at least have the insight to post why he's wrong. Do you know about some games that got banned? Any? One?

    2. Re:YOU LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're gonna mod him down, you can't post why. You can't participate in discussions you've moderated.

    3. Re:YOU LIE by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. Log out, and use an anonymous proxy. There are lots available for free on those proxy-list sites at any one time.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  89. Re:Restriction of Freedom for China is Freedom its by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that Funny is what I'm thinking of when I read that post. Maybe, (Score:5, (Accurate) Dire Predictions of the Future)?

  90. George Orwell is watching you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like an abridged version of 1984 minus a nice cosy room at the ministry of love

    1. Re:George Orwell is watching you by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


      Orwell wrote the book as an observation of the world around him.

      The society really hasn't changed the rules since he wrote the book.

      However, with rights suspension and other things going on, it is looking more like we are heading back to a monrarchical state again... just with big overhead costs.

  91. THE UNITED STATES MUST BRING FREEDOM TO CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But the US won't, because Freedom is doublespeak for Capitalist Market, which China already is.

    Thus, bring on the fascism, as long as the US profits.

  92. Slashdot got the headline wrong by snakecoder · · Score: 5, Funny



    It should be China promoting 50 new games

    AP- In a flash of brilliant marketing, China has given 50 games the kiss of life by banning them. Young students were clamoring to see the list so they could figure out what games they wanted to get ahold of first. One unnamed student was quoted as saying "I've never had a way to find out what games would be good. This list is awesome".

    --
    -Nuke the moon
    1. Re:Slashdot got the headline wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote a perl script which checks the referer logs for web pages which have been redirected to our Surf Control deny page.

      Lots of porn sites, mostly. Including a site with a nice list of brothels. Not that that would be interesting to the average Slashdot geek.

  93. Consumerism isn't really new or american by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about China, but I can tell you first hand that in Eastern Europe during communism, people also bought stuff to feel good about themselves. There were people starving themselves and their family for a lifetime to get a bigger TV or an imported car, or to show off at work that they can afford imported cigarettes or whatever.

    Again, from experience, I can tell you that The Sims could have been just as well about a Soviet family, or a Czech one, or a Bulgarian one, or an East German one. Maybe the prices would be 10 times higher, then, but that's about it. (Well, and also homosexuality would get your sims arrested.)

    The difference is the abbundance and cost of goods. In America you might not _need_ to take a loan to get a new fridge. (But you might do it anyway.) And in The Sims you only need to "save up" for 3 days or so for a fridge. In Eastern Europe, you'd feel the monthly paymets a lot more.

    But the basic phenomenon is the same. It's basically about keeping up with the Joneses, or preferrably one-upping the Joneses.

    And it's existed everywhere humans live, and for as long as humans have existed. No offense to the Egyptians, whose ancient culture I actually admire, but the pyramids are the perfect example of that phenomenon happening verbatim some 4000 years ago. They started with a small mastaba, and ended up with monstrosities that took a lifetime to build, and cost the country a lot. Because each pharaoh wanted to show all y'all that his... ahem... obelisk, is bigger than yours. And than the previous pharaoh's.

    Or in the same ancient times phoenicians made a fortune trading in luxury items, like purple dye. It had no other value than being an expensive thing to show off with. Made some people good about themselves that they can afford it. Proto-Consumerism at its finest back then, eh?

    And so on, and so forth.

    So basically I think the Chinese government is kidding themselves if they think that China is above consumerism.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Consumerism isn't really new or american by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Ever since Deng Xiaoping became leader, one of the messages the Chinese government give to their people is "enrich yourself".

      There is a small (in proportion) but growing middle-class in China. If you travelled to Beijing today you would recognize the prototype of the yuppie in the streets almost indistinguishable from the ones in Tokyo or NYC. These guys have money, nice cars, cell phones, sattelite TV and broadband at home, etc.

      Today Chinese tourists in Europe make up the second largest contingent after the Japanese. They don't stay for long but they spend *more*. Read more about it there
      .

      I don't think China is opposed to consumerism, but the Chinese government or some part of it would probably want some kind of control over it.

      This decision smacks of obvious over-reaction by some conservative factions in power. It may not have much actual effect. P2P is alive in China as well. If anything it will encourage piracy.

  94. How long will they let this go on? by Kosi · · Score: 1

    I wonder when the 1,3G Chinese people will be fed up enough with their dictators pretending to be communists that they get rid of them at last.

    Although banning games is useless meddling with symptoms, I normally can grok the intention behind (like trying to reduce violence by banning violent games). But in Sims 2 there is no violence, no sex, no [anything harmful] at all!

  95. Re:Get a hint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex is gread. Pictures of people having sex are good. Pixelated pictures of people having are bad. Pixelated pictures of 2005-era CGI characters having "woo-hoo" is beyond the pale.

  96. China has Taste by Macrat · · Score: 1

    Not interested in the US's freedom to be stupid.

  97. available at all? by willwarner · · Score: 1

    So piating the games is illegal. But can they be bought legally from the Bureau of Video Games? Could they ever have been? The article was ambiguous, so does anyone have outside info?

  98. The way it is presented as 'fact'... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...in US Schools is that the law is that the law is far worse then it actually is in practice.

    Like I said, it's *mostly* a terrible evil law through the 'wonders' of US Propaganda. Which is little different then the propaganda foisted upon Chinese school children.

    If all the world's governments or individuals teaching school could simply overcome the need to spout off only partially correct or completely incorrect propaganda about everyone else...

    Well, let's just say the human species would likely be better off.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      It is fact. People in China do undergo force abortions. Women are punished for being raped and having a second child. Families and individuals suffer for generations when they decide out of love, religion or necessity to have a second child.

      As for propaganda, spend some time in central China. You want to know progaganda, check it out yourself. Every time you turn on the television you are deluged with lies about the Korean War, the current administration, the China space program, Tsunamis in the south Pacific and China's grand effort to save millions of people, and Taiwan. Or try living in China, a country where owning a 4 inch knife is illegal. You know nothing about propaganda.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    2. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Chinese who have lived in North America for a while, I feel the same way about Western media, on almost all the issues regarding China. Seems the same lie gets repeated again and again. It is culturally fashionable for people to bash China when they know nothing about it.

    3. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      As a North American who has lived in China, I KNOW Chinese media is biased, as is Chinese culture. The Chinese are still convinced that they are the center of the earth. Anyone who says otherwise is wrong. Any criticism of Chinese culture is wrong. Bo Yang spent a decade in jail because of people with your attitude, and that was in freer Taiwan. In the mainland, they simply would have killed him.

      The only thing that is culturally fashionable about the American attitude to China is not to care. The Chinese are obsessed with the Americans. Not the other way around. That the Western media reports (more or less) the truth about China may disturb your sensibilities, but that's the way a free media works.

      Furthermore, if there is a bias in the American media, it is a pro-China bias. The stuff that the PRC gets away with is unbelievable. The level of suffering that the Communist government has created is unbelievable to someone who has not spent time with the poor people in China.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    4. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by js7a · · Score: 1
      China, a country where owning a 4 inch knife is illegal
      What?
    5. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Chinese are still convinced that they are the center of the earth."

      You have just completely discredited yourself. The problem with China right now is the opposite, that anything the West do cannot be wrong, and everything must be better. When in fact there are elements that China definitely shouldn't imitate.

      The free media in West is nothing but a self-sensored network of infotainments that are there to stroke the average Joe's view on the world, which mainly revolves around USA.

      The American media is pro-China? Don't make me laugh.

    6. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right. You have just heard this guys saying that Chinese people don't even have kitchen knifes.

      That is a total lie. Many Chinese still have swords and sabres that are culture relics. People who live close to the forest still hunt. And the culture minority of Hui are known to carry their knifes around all the time. (Thats why you should never get into an argument with them!)

      Now, owning firearms is illegal. However this is true in a number of countries.

    7. Re:The way it is presented as 'fact'... by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      The Chinese are still convinced they are the center of the earth. The problem in China is people like you, people who are opposed to changing any aspect of the misogynistic, xenophobic, class-ist, oppressive culture. You poison your children's minds and beat them when they do not agree with you. You kill protesters who disagree with you. You hate those who prove themselves capable or friendly. You would rather blame others for your misfortune than work to fix it, and you will not let those "under you" work to get out of their misfortune. You despise people like restaurant owners, because you believe they do not have a skill. But you believe police officers are near the pinnacle of society, simply because they have a government position and authority over others. You want to conqueror Taiwan and murder your "brothers", because to let 23 million Chinese live in peace and democracy proves you wrong. You believe your wife should remain in the kitchen, caring for your child, while you cavort with mistresses. You hate people like taxi drivers, because you believe they have no skills, but might go an extra kilometer to charge you more. You love watching white people as buffoons on television; it makes you feel better about yourself. You believe the American media and the American people are obsessed with China. You hate fellow Chinese who tell you to reform because you believe your culture is the center of everything; it is ageless and perfect. You despise American born Chinese; they act proud like Americans, but look just like you. You ignore advice from men like Deng Xiaoping even though he made your country strong, and try to follow the ancient teachings of Confucius even though it made your country weak. Eventually, you will reap as you sow. You have been warned. There are Chinese who know they must reform. In the PRC they are killed, but there are 23 million of them less than two hundred kilometers in a different country just off the coast who are for the moment beyond your clutches. Listen to them, and better yourself.

      As for those who wish to know The Truth about China, here it is. There is potential in 1.3 billion people. Whether it is potential for good or evil is entirely up to them.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  99. The "Shit Arcade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You hit the nail on the head. Too many people
    seem to value money far above people, and will
    bite and claw their way to the top, even if it
    means fucking someone else over.

    Speaking of that, I live near Hollywood, the
    home of multi-million dollar mansions,
    limos, glitz, glammer, and loads of money. Yet,
    there are men, women, and even runaway children
    selling their ass on the streets just to add
    a few extra points to their
    monetary "score"(translation: to be able to eat
    that night.) I'm sick of this giant, cold hearted,
    cruel, and yes, *DEADLY* "video game" that we
    usualy refer to as "the economy".

    1. Re:The "Shit Arcade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People scatch their heads and wonder why their kids grow up depraved, depressed and desperate. Socety (should we call it the "economy" now?) is setting a very bad example for kids today.

  100. Mod parrent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod Parrent up
    +5 insightful

  101. Wow, Slashdot sure ate that propaganda up by Enoch+Root · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article says China is banning 50 games, 26 of which are pirated. Since they are banning the game and not going after sources of piracy, the explanation is simple: it's disguised censorship.

    Take a game like "The Sims 2". It's not published in China. Hence, all copies of "The Sims 2" in China are pirated. Hence, China can claim they are fighting piracy... But the truth is, if EA decided to publish "The Sims 2", they would not be able to because it is banned. (Interestingly, Ubisoft tends to publish EA games in China; for instance, Call of Duty. AFAIK, EA doesn't publish in China.)

    That being said...

    The dychotomy of China is that, while a game, movie or book might be banned from legal publishing, the Government makes no real effort to prevent piracy! If you're a movie director who does gay movies in China, the Government will most certainly 'ban' your film, which means you'll never find a distributor and cannot make money from projections. Your movie can still be found for a buck on the street corner, though.

    So, the result of banning a pirated game just means publishers will never be able to publish it in the Mainland.

    Result: it encourages piracy by preventing legal publishing.

  102. Filthy communists by ShawnMcCool42 · · Score: 1

    sanitize life for all of your citizens. Reduce the amount of lifestyle variation in your culture. It's your own downfall. So get crackin!

  103. Classic Communist "Head in the sand" tactics by skink1100 · · Score: 1

    In keeping with Hitler's "tell a big enough lie and people will believe it" principle, China persists in maintaining the myth that Taiwan is not a sovereign nation. This despite the fact that all evidence is to the contrary. They are helped in this by nations that want their business (like the US and most of western Europe), but even that is handled with a diplomatic wink and a nudge.

    Suppression of the truth on this sort of scale is the death knell of dictatorships, and I predict we will see the fall of these tyrants in our lifetime. Just wait until their economy takes a downturn (as all economies do from time to time) and 1.3 billion hungry people take a hard look at their situation.

    S

    1. Re:Classic Communist "Head in the sand" tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Chinese do understand the situation of Taiwan today. Way better than an American who gets fed by "free press" here in N. America. Thats why they support military action if peaceful resolution don't work out, because of the gravity of the situation. The only reason why the communist didn't finish the job during the civil war was because USA was behind the facist nationalist government.

  104. Farenheit 451 anyone? by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    Soon books and people will will burn for owning
    books from the west or speak of overturning the government.
    I pray our own laws won't do the same to US.

    --
    Farenheit 451 proves that knowledge is powerful

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  105. I hear that... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    [This isn't flamebait--just trying to make a point]
    I hear that the Chinese are also banning titles like "Assassinate Chairman Mao" and "Kill Those Commie Bastards" ...

    I wonder why?

    C'mon. Do you think the US government would probably frown upon a game from the Middle East entitled "Death to Infidels" where one tries to assassinate the president, drive planes into buildings, and behead Jews? To some of these extremists, these are perfectly appropriate methods of war but we call them terrorists. I could only assume that the Chinese find any games laced with "imperialist dogma" to be equally offensive to their culture. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just pointing out the double-standards we live by. It's all relative, man.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:I hear that... by lifespan · · Score: 0

      The old arcade game 1942 had Japanese enemies for the Western release and American enemeies for the Eastern release. Games have always used the prejudices our govt spoonfeeds us to provide a suitable "bad guy". "Reds under the bed" and "the yellow peril" LOL Weren't we suckers back then?

      --
      -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
  106. Also in the news by fussbudget · · Score: 1

    I guess this means that "Grand Theft Auto - Tiananmen Square" is also out.

  107. Most misleading slashdot post, ever. by strAtEdgE · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is really starting to suck hardcore lately.

    The post seems to be trying hard to imply that the games themselves were banned, as if for content or otherwise in the name of censorship. But if you actually read the article, it's nothing of the sort. The games are banned because they're only being distributed illegally (all copies of the game in China are inherantly pirated). This is completely different. It's more likely to mean that China is trying to pave the way for foreign software to enter their market, not the other way around.

    It's bad enough when people here don't RTFA, but when the original poster's start not RTFA either, this whole website is going to shit.

    --
    ----- sXe
  108. Re:Get a hint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought she was knocked-up too? gee if so, he got away with what would be today a double murder.....

  109. Re:Get a hint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > non-violent drug offenders getting the electric chair.

    Such as?

  110. "The "$|-|1t Arcade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . You hit the nail on the head. Too many people
    seem to value money far above people, and will
    bite and claw their way to the top, even if it
    means fucking someone else over.

    Speaking of that, I live near Hollywood, the
    home of multi-million dollar mansions,
    limos, glitz, glammer, and loads of money. Yet,
    there are men, women, and even runaway children
    selling their ass on the streets just to add
    a few extra points to their
    monetary "score"(translation: to be able to eat
    that night.) I'm sick of this giant, cold hearted,
    cruel, and yes, *DEADLY* "video game" that we
    usualy refer to as "the economy".

  111. Xinhau? by kid+nickng · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be Xinhua

  112. Boo hoo by deesine · · Score: 0


    Boo hoo. My government turned out not to be a surrogate mother. Boo hoo. Life sucks.

    My government likes other bad governments. Boo hoo.

    No matter how hard I work...I still have to work. Rich people don't work. Boo hoo.

    My government isn't serving me happy burgers...but try to be happy anyways.

    (Someone's not having a good Wednesday!)

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot

    2. Re:Boo hoo by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


      Boo hoo. I can't make a cogent argument so I have to attack the poster.

    3. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read his history of posts. He's just messing around. I think he's an AOL'er.

  113. Well, here's some real first-hand info by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    You do bring some valid questions about communism, so here's some first-hand info. And the comparison to The Sims. Now I dunno about China, but in the Eastern European/Soviet kind of communism:

    - you did get more money if you got a promotion, or simply by staying longer in the same job. They had some standardized lists of job levels, number of years in the same job, etc, which gave you a standard salary for whatever bracket you fit in.

    I.e., if anything The Sims is _more_ Soviet style than American capitalism. I don't remember my Sims ever negotiating a salary... and discovering that they're paid half of what Bob Newbie earns at the same job level. Just because Bob is a white male, whereas your Sim happens to be black or female, so he/she can only get a token job at the reception.

    - communism was all about giving everyone a job, and keeping them in it, regardless of any economics. (Which is one thing that drove their economy into the ground.) It couldn't happen that you suddenly got fired because the comrade commissar leading the company got a better deal outsourcing to India, or "downsized" half the company to please the shareholders.

    Just like in The Sims. (You can get fired in TS2, though, but only if you choose the most spectacularly stupid choices in those random events.)

    - You certainly could move to another company or switch carreers, and I personally know people who did. E.g., from economist to programmer. Or here's another bit of _fact_ for you: _all_ KGB employees had branched into it from another job. Their agents had to have a university/college degree in some unrelated job, and had been later given the opportunity to switch carreer to the KGB if the KGB deemed them worthy. Or a lot of the army officers and NCOs were poor workers and peasants who had basically switched carreer to the military because it paid better (and obviously went through a military school for it.)

    Just like in The Sims, eh?

    - You could definitely buy _most_ stuff without a waiting list and without anyone's approval. There were indeed things like cars, and a few others that did require waiting for years, because the economy could only supply about a tenth of the demand.

    But then again, you can't even buy a car in The Sims, at all, ever. So...

    - You did have to go through approval (and massive corruption) for some other stuff, depending on the country, like moving to a major city. Or in China for moving to another city at all.

    Then again, in The Sims you can't even move to another _street_. You're stuck to living around Sim Lane for ever. In TS2 you can move a family to another town, but neither of them is really more than a village, so in most communist countries that would need no more paperwork than in, say, western Germany. You just had to inform the authorities that you moved there, basically.

    - A lot of the stuff was heavily based on corruption and nepotism. Knowing the right person and giving them the right "gift" did more for your carreer or your position on those waiting lists, than basically anything else. Having a friend of a friend who can introduce you to the one who'll approve or deny your paperwork, was usually more than half the solution. (Yet another thing that drove their economy into the ground.)

    Where have we seen something similar enough? Yep, in The Sims. You need enough friends for a promotion.

    Etc.

    Basically communism wasn't _that_ different as you seem to assume, once you get to the micro level that The Sims is all about. Yes, it was pretty much a synonim for oppression, corruption and poverty. No arguments there. But at micro level, you weren't exactly a slave chained to the desk where you work, either.

    Their brand of slavery was slightly more subtle, and based on having not much other choice. It was a _macro_ thing, rather than micro-managing everyone. E.g., they didn't plan that _you_ are sold into slavery to do Job X for the rest of your days. They just planned that there are 200,000 of jobs i

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  114. Re:Get a hint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such as I was being facetious in my response to a troll.

  115. MOD UP, for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many people in this country believe in the myth of the meritocracy. It's true that we have more social mobility than say, Feudal Japan, but the idea that anyone can bring themselves from rags to riches is pure fantasy. Only a select few, the ubermench among us, are capable of this.

    I'd also like to recommend the film Born Rich, made by Johnson & Johnson heir Jaime Johnson. I took a personal interest in this movie, having at one time been on his father's payroll (very briefly). He stops short of analyzing the sociatal implications of hereditary wealth, but the film is telling - not a single one of his super-rich friends did a thing to earn their vast fortunes (including the ones who are considered "new money").

  116. The President posts to Slashdot. by Rufus88 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Arn't the Swedes supposed to me neutral?

    It would seem that the President of the United States posts to Slashdot. His comment above mimics those reported in Ron Suskind's NT Times Magazine article "Without A Doubt":


    "In the Oval Office in December 2002, the president met with a few ranking senators and members of the House, both Republicans and Democrats. In those days, there were high hopes that the United States-sponsored 'road map' for the Israelis and Palestinians would be a pathway to peace, and the discussion that wintry day was, in part, about countries providing peacekeeping forces in the region. The problem, everyone agreed, was that a number of European countries, like France and Germany, had armies that were not trusted by either the Israelis or Palestinians. One congressman -- the Hungarian-born Tom Lantos, a Democrat from California and the only Holocaust survivor in Congress -- mentioned that the Scandinavian countries were viewed more positively. Lantos went on to describe for the president how the Swedish Army might be an ideal candidate to anchor a small peacekeeping force on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Sweden has a well-trained force of about 25,000. The president looked at him appraisingly, several people in the room recall.

    'I don't know why you're talking about Sweden,' Bush said. 'They're the neutral one. They don't have an army.'

    Lantos paused, a little shocked, and offered a gentlemanly reply: 'Mr. President, you may have thought that I said Switzerland. They're the ones that are historically neutral, without an army.' Then Lantos mentioned, in a gracious aside, that the Swiss do have a tough national guard to protect the country in the event of invasion.

    Bush held to his view. 'No, no, it's Sweden that has no army.'

    The room went silent, until someone changed the subject.

    A few weeks later, members of Congress and their spouses gathered with administration officials and other dignitaries for the White House Christmas party. The president saw Lantos and grabbed him by the shoulder. 'You were right,' he said, with bonhomie. 'Sweden does have an army.'"

  117. I am the parent of this and I will respond... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    The difference, eloquently summed up by another as in "we have more freedom", is that you are free to become one of those few rich, and in your cynical view, exploit the many poor. While not everyone is poor out of choice, some of the poor are there due to laziness. When was the last time you did something to change your situation, or the situation of those around you for the better? Even if you believe your post, and are firmly convinced that the polo-pony riding elite power structure will never change, you can still make every effort to go out and get yourself a pony and fake your way into the country club.


    Later, you ask what I did to change it.

    I try to change it all the time. I am a journalist, and I work hard. The truth is to be told, and there are literally millions of people in this country, who are poor, who have great intelligence, and who could do a better job than our current elected man-king.

    Ignore all the facts about Bush but one: When did a son of a powerful man ever do a good job in history? What? We have had maybe a handful that have ever been worth a crap.

    Since when did hiring the loser son of anyone in power make any situation ever better? Usually that is the last person your civilization ever gets as a leader, if you count up all of the implosions of societies. How can anyone ever think that it was a good idea? The son of a powerful man is always a punk. ALWAYS. Why are we surprised when Dubya acts all snotty to anyone that disagrees with him? That is "Rich Kid 101."

    "Dude, my dad owns a dealership and knows the Sherriff, so we're cool, alright? So do it, man."

    Back to America.
    How can you explain that the system is not a feudalistic sham when only once in a blue moon someone of ignoble birth gets to be President or a Senator, and instead we have a parade a line of nepotistic skull 'n bones brat-children who can't add two and two together as the leaders of this system?

    Freedom? Freedom involves choices. If the freedom that you speak of is the freedom to climb to the top of the pile to kick the other dogs off of your hill, then that isn't freedom at all, it is feudalism, exactly as I stated, where families push their bratty, maid humping progeny off on us generation after generation, and the differences are moot.

    The truly smart, and the truly good hard working intelligent underclass of this world have always been beat down. How else do you hold them, they got nothing to lose. That is the only way to hold your power. There are a freakin' billion on this planet that are smarter than your high-class idiot spawn even without a Ivy League education. When your cocaine-sniffing son can't intellectually compete in an advanced society, what do you do? YOU BUY THE ELECTION, KOWTOW TO THE POWERS THAT BE, OR CHEAT.

    Surprise surprise where we are right now. We have a boy-king. And he wages the sport of kings, WAR, at his discretion. I am shocked. "My GOD, WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE! This is a totally new global dynamic going on!"

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

    There are a lot of smart people buried in phone answering jobs out there because of the misfortune of birth. I think we can all attest to the caring, fantastic morals, honesty, appeals to higher thinking, and absolute brilliance of the current President of the United States... and how it all seals my argument against your flag waving.

    Just don't try to shove that one word (freedom) down my throat to explain a complicated universe that no one can comprehend. This kind of talk is for the big boys with big ideas.

    Don't come peddling that intellectual marketing that we call the political process around here these days.

    The poor get screwed. Don't sell me otherwise.

    Oh, and indeed, no matter what I say about America, China is a freaking hellhole. So stop that counterargument right there. They aren't connected.

    1. Re:I am the parent of this and I will respond... by miu · · Score: 1
      "The generality of princes, if they were stripped of their purple and cast naked into the world, would immediately sink to the lowest level of society without a hope of emerging from their obscurity."

      --"The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (volume 2)", Edward Gibbon

      If you read Gibbons work you will see that governments can limp along for a long time on very bad leadership. Bush isn't enough to destroy America, but his followers might be.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    2. Re:I am the parent of this and I will respond... by servognome · · Score: 1

      I think we can all attest to the caring, fantastic morals, honesty, appeals to higher thinking, and absolute brilliance of the current President of the United States... and how it all seals my argument against your flag waving.
      I would argue this reflects more poorly on the electorate than on the elected. Being rich and coming from a powerful family doesn't guarantee anything in the system. Ultimately they have to convince those people buried in phone jobs that they can lead them.
      The system isn't flawed, the voters are. They are the ones who decide to they want to be led by actors, entertainers, or the child/sibling/spouse of somebody already in politics.
      It's nice to feel victimized and point and say, "look only the rich and powerful can get elected" the system is screwed up. It's not the system's fault that people vote for they guy who has the most TV commercials, that incumbency is the greatest factor in winning an election, or that people vote for the cute/cool/funny candidate. The reason it's difficult for somebody who isn't famous or rich to get political power isn't because goverment is holding them down, it's because the people care more about image than issues.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  118. another take on that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In keeping with Hitler's "tell a big enough lie and people will believe it" principle, the United States persists in maintaining the myth that Iraq was a threat to us. This despite the fact that all evidence is to the contrary. They are helped in this by nations that want their business (like the UK and most of eastern Europe), but even that is handled with a diplomatic wink and a nudge.

    Suppression of the truth on this sort of scale is the death knell of dictatorships, and I predict we will see the fall of these tyrants in our lifetime. Just wait until their economy takes a downturn (as all economies do from time to time) and 300 million hungry people take a hard look at their situation.

    I was not even remotely commenting on what you said, I think you're 100% right about China - but I couldn't resist this, it just fits too well...

  119. Enough Politics by FlawZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If any of you guys can read Chinese, the Chinese version of the story says that 26 of the games banned were pirated games and the other 24 were being sold before getting any permission from related authorities.

    And BTW, some people here need to update their information about China. I can still remember when I casually mentioned that I had watched a movie named A Clockwise Orange or something in an interview with a HK reporter a few years ago, the shocked look on her face (she was pretty... but that's another story). Wake up from the Cold War! Basically people here in China (at least college students) can get mostly everything from the Internet, from anal porn to H-games (oops, these things sound belonging to the same category?) to Friends (SitCom) or 24 Hours. I'm not trying to say that everything is perfect here, and there are still a lot of restrictions officially, but... things are changing, and it's not all that bad.

  120. Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Google help enforce the ban?

  121. Ok, I found the news in Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from http://www.cctv.com/news/china/20050126/102938.sht ml
    (yes, Simplified Chinese)

    The Sims 2, Painkiller, Battlefield Vietnam, Titan and FIFA 2005 ...(26 in total) are on the piracy list.
    The Doom and other games (don't know their names in English) (24 in total) are on the illegal distribution list, which they are translated and sold in China without the approval. There are some names of the companies involved in the "illegal selling" in the news.
    Apparently, China didn't ban any games. They don't need to, they can simply refuse to give out the permission of some particular games (too violence, political incorrect)they don't like, and it will fall into piracy category if someone try to play it, unless it is copyright-free.

  122. Re:Get a hint by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

    Why is this offtopic?

  123. Re:Get a hint by MegaHyster · · Score: 1

    What is this "sex" you speak of?

    --
    All good things...
  124. 4 $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means, if you copy those games in US and sell them in China, you can charge 4x the price because first you will have almost no competitor, and second people can't find these games anywhere else, and third these games are good.

    Idiotic Chinese government, or maybe they did this because they wanted to monopolize these games. (grin..)

  125. Holy Shit! You a Justice of the Peace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure sound like one!

  126. Look on ebay for the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is wrong

    searching on china's ebay show Sims 2 being sold.

    http://cgi.ebay.com.cn/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&c ategory=63268&item=8164233005&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW /

    have a look for yourselves and try a few more title of the list of banned games and see if they are for sale.

    ebay in china http://www.ebay.com.cn/