Slashdot Mirror


Nokia's Linux Handheld

Nils Faerber writes "Today Nokia announced the introduction of the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet device along with the Open Source based Maemo Development Platform. With this new product Nokia enters several new worlds all at once. A new concept for the use of a handheld device, a new fully visible open source based development process and the explicit use of open source software in a commercial grade product. The typical use case for the Nokia 770 is to be the internet usability extension to your mobile phone or other wireless internet access equipment. It is extremely portable by its small formfactor, usable for almost all internet applications thorugh its exceptional resolution of 800x480 pixel and its multimedia capabilities by making use of a TI-OMAP CPU and a accompanying digital signal processor (DSP) core. The consequent use of open source software and technology basing on the Linux kernel 2.6, X11-server technology and the GTK+ toolkit the resulting new Hildon graphical user interface creates a fully new user interface experience for portable Linux devices."

320 comments

  1. The nokia Internet tablet by the_xaqster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take 2 and call me in the morning....

    --
    I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
    1. Re:The nokia Internet tablet by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      I need pills for my headache after looking at the device.

      Have a look at this picture of the unit - you need a magnifying class to read the web pages.

  2. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If this gets popular, and as presumably the interface will be similar to all other Nokia products, people will realise that Linux is not necessarily hard to use.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Actually, they probably won't realize it has anything to do with Linux at all.

      In any case, a wildly cut-down version of a Linux desktop has nothing to do with "Linux usability" in the usual sense, any more than a Linux- or Windows-based ATM says anything about the usability of the parent OS.

    2. Re:Good by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      people will realise that Linux is not necessarily hard to use.

      If by "people" you mean the general non-computer-geek population, then I really don't think they care what OS the unit is running. Tivo is easy to use and runs on Linux. Archos media players are easy to use... The list continues.

      Linux *can* be difficult to use, especially as a home OS. UIs that lay over the kernel and OS don't have to be.

    3. Re:Good by CortoMaltese · · Score: 3, Informative

      The FAQ confirms that "the user interface has its roots in the smartphone Series 90 user interface."

    4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Archos media players are worthless junk and have about the worst UI I've ever seen - they make Windows seem elegant.

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worthless? Wow, I use it as a 80GB HD, a Tivo, and media player.

      It's better than a worthless iPod which has no color, doesn't play video, and is only 40GB.

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slow HD, a tragic TiVo and a piss-poor media player all rolled into one far-too-big-and-expensive package! And the screen's shit too (compare with an Epson P2000).

      And a UI so frustratingly bad that you want to cry! It's like a cheap 'Swiss' army knife the cuts your finger off the day you actually try to use the bastard. Absolutely hopeless.

      The iPod actually does it's ONE job WELL, the Archos does its six jobs SHITTILY.

    7. Re:Good by joshdick · · Score: 1
      1. What style is the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet user interface?
      The user interface has its roots in the smartphone Series 90 user interface and has been specifically adapted for the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet. Features such as one hand usage, zooming, panning and full screen have been designed to create a convenient Internet usage experience.
      Especially easy to use for pr0n.
    8. Re:Good by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. Linux advocates need to stop thinking of themselves as evangelists. People will buy what works -- they could care less about geek religious issues. If you want to attack the Microsoft Monoculture, deal with the issues that makes it dominant: legacy support, interoperability, retraining costs.

    9. Re:Good by GnomeAttic · · Score: 1

      If this gets popular, and as presumably the interface will be similar to all other Nokia products, people will realise that Linux is not necessarily hard to use.

      You mean like the N-Gage? It took me 20 minutes to send a 3-word text message on a demo N-Gage and then it gave me the helpful error message "format unsupported".

    10. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's generally something people hide their heads in shame about, rather than brag about in front of thousands of Slashdotters. We're all laughing at you.

    11. Re:Good by bit01 · · Score: 1

      I agree people should concentrate on technical issues however there is a double standard here.

      When companies do it it's called "marketing" and when anybody else does it it's called "evangelism".

      OSS unfortunately needs marketing (i.e. evangelism) just to be on a level playing field with the squillion M$ spends on marketing. OSS/FS marketing is often voluntary, like everything else in OSS/FS.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    12. Re:Good by fm6 · · Score: 1
      That's ironic. By equating evangelism with marketing, you echo (unconsciously, I assume) Microsoft's "Your potential, our passion!"

      But they're not the same thing. A marketeer is a hired gun who helps you find a market. An evangelist (in Greek, it means "bringer of good news") is a true believer who wants to make the world a better place. Billy Graham doesn't evangelize because he's worried about empty churches -- he wants to save souls.

      I'm all for Linux advocates thinking less like evangelists and more like marketeers. Then they'd think more about solving the problems of potential Linux users, and less about telling everybody how cool Linux is.

    13. Re:Good by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Right because you dont need to retrain people when they move from nt4 to 2000 or 2003. You wont need to retrain them for longhorn either. Get a grip. While your at it please alert microsoft that nobody ever needs to be trained when upgrading their software since there are no differences from one version to another.

      Interoperability with what ? They dont play nice with any other operating system and are notoriously bad about dealing with open standards.

      Microsoft is dominant because it had business savvy when nobody else in the industry seemed to be any the wiser. They said "pay us for *every* machine you make, weather it includes windows or not" and everyone agreed because at the time it seemed like a logical choice since there was no major competition. Business sense would have said "leave yourself an out". No out. Hence the majority of PC makers have been locked into paying MS or Using MS for the past decade or so. Since MS is the OS thats shipped on the majority of machines not because its what everyone chooses. They lied cheated and stole to put themselves in this position because they knew they would profit greater than they would lose.

      How many people do you know who have ever installed windows ? Not many of them are "normal users" I can assure you that. The majority of people just use whats already on the system unless they know what they are doing. Case in point: Apple. You dont see people wiping OSX out for something else. Heck a lot of peope still run ME. Never been a worse OS.

      I have never had a person tell me that linux is difficult to use. Difficult to master sure. The average user is no more likely to recompile a kernel than they are to mess with the registry. You just sit and go. In many ways linux is much more sane than windows. File/directory structure is much more sane. Security is better. Performance is better because there aren't all these little bloatware/spyware/adware programs installed in the background. Mostly because the design and implementation is about actually working. Its not determined by marketing or what somebody thinks will be "idiot proof".

      Everyone applies this theory about the average MS user being good with computers. That couldnt be farther from the truth. People act like the average MS user even knows what version of windows they are using, or what web browser or what anti virus etc etc. They have no clue. They just want to click and go. Guess what ? With a modern linux distro thats all you have to do the majority of the time. Yeah you might have some damn frustrating issues with a driver or what have you, but you have the EXACT same issues with MS. How many hundreds of sites are out there dedicated to fixing stupid little MS driver issues ? Think the average person knows how to do any of whats required on those sites ? Nope.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    14. Re:Good by bit01 · · Score: 1

      That's ironic. By equating evangelism with marketing, you echo (unconsciously, I assume) Microsoft's "Your potential, our passion!"

      Nope, just echoing the dotcom BS where numerous businesses employed "evangelists", instead of marketing directors. M$ is just one of many.

      But they're not the same thing. A marketeer is a hired gun who helps you find a market. An evangelist (in Greek, it means "bringer of good news") is a true believer who wants to make the world a better place. Billy Graham doesn't evangelize because he's worried about empty churches -- he wants to save souls.

      Disagree. The formal definition of evangelist is somebody who promotes the christian gospel. Informally, it's just a promotor of something, whether a religion, a product or an idea.

      I'm all for Linux advocates thinking less like evangelists and more like marketeers. Then they'd think more about solving the problems of potential Linux users, and less about telling everybody how cool Linux is.

      Both are needed, one to promote feedback and continuous improvement, the other to neutralise the mountain of biased BS that M$ and similar companies put out.

      It's stupid to pretend M$ and similar companies spending large sums of money trying to kill FOSS mindshare is not harmful. They want to marginalise FOSS. That's not going to happen.

      ---

      GNU/Linux, the world's #1 OS by google hits. M$ windows #2.
      Open Office the world's #1 office suite. M$ office #2.
      Apache, the world's #1 web server. M$ IIS #2.
      Evolution, the world's #1 email client, M$ outlook #2.
      Unfortunately mozilla family browsers are still #2, M$ internet explorer is #1, but watch firefox (#3) grow.

      Congratulations everybody, world domination. ;-)

    15. Re:Good by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what you mean by "formal definition". I'm certainly not going to accept a sloppy definition of "evangelist" just because it happens to be used in WordNet by some computer science student. In any case, "evangelist", like most words, has multiple meanings. You can't refute my argument just by insisting on a usage different from the one I meant.

      Perhaps my point will be clearer if I restate my orginal argument without using that controversial word: Too much Linux advocacy is based on somebody's heartfelt belief that Linux is superior in every way to Windows. Not just superior technically, but socially, economically, even morally. I don't actually disagree with most of that -- I just think that most decision makers don't give a shit. If you want them to use Linux -- or any other OSS solution -- you need to show them how it addresses their needs as they perceive them, and stop trying to change their whole world view.

      It's stupid to pretend M$ and similar companies spending large sums of money trying to kill FOSS mindshare is not harmful. They want to marginalise FOSS.
      I've never disputed that. I'm only arguing that religious zealotry is not a productive response.
    16. Re:Good by bit01 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean by "formal definition". I'm certainly not going to accept a sloppy definition of "evangelist" just because it happens to be used in WordNet by some computer science student. In any case, "evangelist", like most words, has multiple meanings. You can't refute my argument just by insisting on a usage different from the one I meant.

      I checked offline before posting that definition link. In any case, Merriam-Webster and Oxford agree. I disagree with your view of .edu links, they are often more trustworthy than .com links for various reasons.

      Perhaps my point will be clearer if I restate my orginal argument without using that controversial word: Too much Linux advocacy is based on somebody's heartfelt belief that Linux is superior in every way to Windows. Not just superior technically, but socially, economically, even morally.

      I've never met an advocate that says Linux, or any FOSS, is superior in every way, particularly from a technical point of view. You're creating a straw man.

      I don't actually disagree with most of that -- I just think that most decision makers don't give a shit.

      It's partly about teaching them to give a shit - about taking the long term view, not the loaded short-term TCO arguments that M$ likes to push. I agree it's an alien way of thinking to many at the moment but you've got to start somewhere,

      If you want them to use Linux -- or any other OSS solution -- you need to show them how it addresses their needs as they perceive them, and stop trying to change their whole world view.

      Like I said, I think we need to do both. Addressing their immediate needs and also get them thinking long term.

      M$ seems to think it's worth spending millions on biased "feel good" ad's with no actual content. Why is that? Can FOSS afford to ignore those ad's? I don't think so.

      I think we're in agreement that FOSS should be promoted, just disagree on the emphasis.

      Part of what's happening is that many Linux proponents are young. They're passionate about what they do. You're trying to push back the tide if you want to stop that.

      ---

      Commercial software bigots - a dying breed.

    17. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No form of Linux is difficult to use, but some are difficult to learn. In fact, the easiest to learn are the most tedious to use.

  3. Left-handed model? by oni · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I doubt there will be a left-handed model. Pretty much every PDA or device like this one has buttons on the left side, which I can't use because I'm holding the device with my right hand because I need to write on it with my left hand.

    Oh well, sucks to be me I guess.

    1. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there'll be software to turn the display upside down and reverse the controls...

    2. Re:Left-handed model? by Markus+Persson · · Score: 1

      You and some 600-700 million other people.

      --
      If the cat can't experience its own death, nothing will ever kill you. (No, really!)
    3. Re:Left-handed model? by millahtime · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt there will be a left-handed model. Pretty much every PDA or device like this one has buttons on the left side, which I can't use because I'm holding the device with my right hand because I need to write on it with my left hand.

      These companies are obviously pregadous against left handed people. You should sue. This is discrimination. The right handers bringing down the left handers. It's must be a secret plot becuase the of the right handers in positions of power not wanting the left handers to get into their inner circle.

    4. Re:Left-handed model? by Soko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it is Open Source, so some enterprising leftie will write a screen/button flipper for the thing - you'll just need to learn how to use the buttons upside down (left arrow will change to right via software, but the pad will be at the bottom, not the top).

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    5. Re:Left-handed model? by uradu · · Score: 1

      In one of the Flash animations it is being passed from the left hand to the right one while flipping it around, seeming to suggest that you can use it upside down as well.

    6. Re:Left-handed model? by Compholio · · Score: 1

      I doubt there will be a left-handed model.

      Ummm, it's a tablet - flip it over and tell X11 to rotate the screen 180 degrees.

    7. Re:Left-handed model? by jintxo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ... pregadous ...

      wtf?

    8. Re:Left-handed model? by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      Prejudicious

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    9. Re:Left-handed model? by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes it does. Your mom should have taken the crayon out of your left hand when you were a kid and put it in the right one. It would have saved you years of grief.

      No way is my kid going to be left handed.

    10. Re:Left-handed model? by beardz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Prejudiced, even :)

    11. Re:Left-handed model? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's must be a secret plot becuase the of the right handers in positions of power

      Are you kidding? The president of the USA has TWO left hands! Just watch him next time he tries to operate an umbrella...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:Left-handed model? by JWW · · Score: 1

      You gotta wonder if you can rotate the display 180 degrees. That way the buttons would end up on the right, albeit in a different arrangement.

    13. Re:Left-handed model? by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      [annoyed grunt]

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    14. Re:Left-handed model? by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't with the soft buttons, but the hard ones. Rotating the screen programmatically is quite easy, but you're going to have problems with the external switches and buttons unless you place similar buttons on the opposite side or corner.

      I have a tablet pc. All I can say is that it's a good thing that I'm not left-handed like the two generations before me, 'cause the scroll and all the hard buttons would be real hard to use.

    15. Re:Left-handed model? by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 0

      Well a dictionary search of "pregadous" suggests that perhaps he meant "preludious," which means pertaining to preludes. This is clearly what he meant.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    16. Re:Left-handed model? by RemovableBait · · Score: 1

      Oh well, sucks to be me I guess.

      On the contrary, left handers are immeasurably superior.

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0871313073/ref=sib _dp_pt/002-0763382-2056844#reader-page

    17. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do what I did; learn to write with both hands. It's never a problem now, and I get to freak people out from time to time.

    18. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you flip it "upside-down" the display should rotate, and the buttons would be on the right-hand side.

      Does it really take a right-hander to figure this out?

    19. Re:Left-handed model? by hawk · · Score: 2, Funny
      It means, "highly susceptible to impregnation"

      THus, there will soon be plenty of little left-handers about.



      hawk

    20. Re:Left-handed model? by coachvince · · Score: 1

      With my tablet PC, the reason I rotate the screen is so I don't have to worry about the hard buttons being on the wrong side; what am I missing here?
      OK, I understand Nokia's prduct might be difficult, but with a true slate "Tablet PC", you just need to rotate the screen display.

      --
    21. Re:Left-handed model? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Shut up, righty.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    22. Re:Left-handed model? by Milkyman · · Score: 1

      this is slashdot, write some software to flip the screen orientation!

    23. Re:Left-handed model? by hullabalucination · · Score: 1
      These companies are obviously pregadous...

      Don't be loodicruss.

    24. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they don't include software that could paint the normal screen upside-down so us lefties could just rotate it 180 degrees and get the buttons on the right. Maybe the trackball thingie's functions need reversing, too. Simple enough....

    25. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooooh, that's almost a google-whack!

    26. Re:Left-handed model? by EphemeralPhart · · Score: 1

      It's a limited mind that acknowledges only one way of spelling a word.

      It does assist communication though, especially if the audience has access to, uhm ..., less powerfull parsing routines.

      Yes, indeed.

    27. Re:Left-handed model? by corngrower · · Score: 1

      The solution isn't always possible. If the device isn't mirror symmetric about a horizontal line, turning it over is not going to completely solve the problem.

    28. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet this problem would be so easily solved by allowing the user to flip the screen. Should they only have designed the buttons so it doesn't matter which way you are holding the device. It's a win-win situation.
      I wonder if this OSS nonsense could produce a software solution. At least on the driver level it should be quite trivial job.

    29. Re:Left-handed model? by ekwhite · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that kind of training doesn't work. I grew up when they tried to 'correct' left-handers. I would try to write left-handed; the teacher tried to correct me; I resisted. I got spanked or sent to the vice-principal's office a lot. I'm still left-handed to this day. I'm just a hell of a lot more stubborn than I would have been if they had just accomodated me.

    30. Re:Left-handed model? by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Fuck you dude, being a lefty paid for college. i played a sport where lefties were valuable, and got a scholarship.

      But if you want to pay for college...

    31. Re:Left-handed model? by solafide · · Score: 1
      No, predigous is not a word. Yes, cromulent is a slang word. I think you ment predacious.

      In reply to ozman's comment, you need to learn some more words. You could have saved 3 keystrokes and said ...of the USA is ambisinistrous. You /.ers have such limited vocabularies;)

    32. Re:Left-handed model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you possibly turn it upside down? Many video drivers support 180-degree rotation of the display. You may have to redo the keyboard mapping as well, but it depends on what kind of buttons are used.

  4. No ethernet by noisymime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know it kind of goes against the whole portability idea, but no ethernet?

    1. Re:No ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no Ogg Vorbis support either. It's a growing file format with a very good quality and I don't understand why they forgot it...

    2. Re:No ethernet by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      can you think of any uses for that USB port ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:No ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, plenty:

      - USB networking with PC;
      - USB keyboard;
      - USB whatever-device-you-can-think-of

    4. Re:No ethernet by Azog · · Score: 1

      The killer for me is no harddrive. If it only had a 40 GB microdrive, (and if the price was reasonable) I would get one instead of an MP3 player.

      I want a single, very portable, programmable, do-nearly-everything device, and this could have been it. I want:

      - MP3 (and OGG and FLAC) playback with a usable UI
      - Fits-in-a-pocket portability. A big pocket is ok.
      - 40 GB hard drive at least. I have a lot of music that I want to carry around, and need space for email and apps too.
      - 16 hour battery life at least, so it goes as long between charges as I go between sleeps
      - Linux OS, useable APIs for writing graphical apps, Tiny-X preferred for portability. I want to be able to write apps for it.
      - USB (to hook up a small portable keyboard)
      - Serial (to hook up my GPS)
      - Wireless internet
      - A decent email / calendaring / scheduling / tasklist application.
      - A decent web browse (i.e. Firefox)

      This is close but not quite. But it is closer than anything else I've seen yet.

      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    5. Re:No ethernet by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      I would get one instead of an MP3 player.

      Are you kidding? This thing is probably going to retail for $600-$700, based on what Nokia ultra-high-end smartphones ("Series 90") go for. You could two of the finest MP3 players on the market for this price.

    6. Re:No ethernet by noisymime · · Score: 1

      i think your dream machine is still a little way off yet then... But with the nokia you could always just have your music collection on a flash drive or RS-MMC. The later would mean there wouldn't even be any extra size.

    7. Re:No ethernet by glebfrank · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding? This thing is probably going to retail for $600-$700

      $350, actually
    8. Re:No ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a single, very portable, programmable, do-nearly-everything device, and this could have been it. I want: ... blah blah

      That's called a laptop.

    9. Re:No ethernet by juhaz · · Score: 1

      40 GB hard drive would double the size of this thing, and 16h battery life is impossible, ESPECIALLY with the hard drive.

      But keep on waiting, maybe in fifty years.

  5. A step in the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good move by Nokia

  6. And it will be a HUGE failure... by Lumpy · · Score: 0, Troll

    There has been many attempts to make a "webpad" and all of them failed horribly because of one thing common with all of them.

    the price was insanely high. $600.00 is way too much for this device. $399.99 is a better price mark but the under $300.00 mark is where it will sell...

    Nokia is getting ready to market another failure as it will be overpriced and will have dismal sales because of that fact.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  7. How much? by datadriven · · Score: 1

    The website doesn't list a price. Anybody know what they're going to charge for these?

    1. Re:How much? by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      MSRP is $350 (U.S.)

    2. Re:How much? by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      No way! Where did you get that number?

  8. I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    integrate a PVR and plenty of storage space and my ipod is in the bin

  9. GStreamer by JohnFluxx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please note that it is also recently revealed that Nokia has been funding GStreamer ! Thank you Nokia!

  10. Seen it already... by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1, Funny

    *cough* PSP *cough*

    1. Re:Seen it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      cough PSP cant surf the web *cough*

      nor can it read emails, play streaming radio and at least 60 other things.

      the PSP is a neat portable game but a webpad it CERTIANLY is not.

      so how do you click on a fricking link because the PSP lacks a touchscreen? and when is FLASH going to be released for the PSP?

      *cough*

    2. Re:Seen it already... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Boy, there must be a cold going around or something. You should try non-drowsy DayQuil. Non-drowsy DayQuil works for up to eight hours and relieves cough, sneezing, stuffy head, fever, and other bothersome cold symptoms.

      Click here for a free coupon for 50 cents off your next purchase of non-drowsy DayQuil.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Seen it already... by temcat · · Score: 1

      Yesterday at work I was translating to Russian UI strings for PSP browser. So yes, it can surf the web.

    4. Re:Seen it already... by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A C64 can too. But does anyone really want to?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:Seen it already... by temcat · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not like it will force you if you don't. Makes me wonder what you are doing here, though, if that's the case ;-)

    6. Re:Seen it already... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      So yes, it can surf the web.

      Not out of the box it can't. You need to get a game that uses the browser. Then fake it out with your own DNS.

  11. Battery Life by AngryScot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    3 hour battery life seems to be a little short if you are going to be traveling and want to use it.

    I suppose you could charge it in your car...

    --

    All spelling mistakes are due to solar flares...honest

    1. Re:Battery Life by rho · · Score: 1
      My thoughts exactly. 3 hour battery puts this into the "toy" range. You can't even pretend it'll work through a business day--it's for having something to surf porn with while on the john.

      Exceedingly useless. Great idea, but the battery kills it.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    2. Re:Battery Life by wren337 · · Score: 1


      Come on, nothing has a working battery life of much more than 3 hours. Look at the screen on this thing. If a 3 hour battery life is the best gripe you can come up with, this thing will sell like hotcakes.

      Me, I'm griping about the storage. What, no 20GB harddrive? Where will I keep my movies?

    3. Re:Battery Life by l810c · · Score: 3, Interesting
      3 hour battery life seems to be a little short if you are going to be traveling and want to use it.

      It's only 1500 mAh, your average NiMH AA is at 2300 mAh each. This battery must be puny.

      An external battery pack would be a cool option. 2 AA's in a small tube with wire could provide nearly 10 hours.

    4. Re:Battery Life by mjg59 · · Score: 1

      Your average NiMH AA is only 1.2 Volts. 1500mAh at 10 Volts is a lot more energy than 2300mAh at 1.2.

    5. Re:Battery Life by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's only 1500 mAh, your average NiMH AA is at 2300 mAh each. This battery must be puny.

      An external battery pack would be a cool option. 2 AA's in a small tube with wire could provide nearly 10 hours.


      10 hours IF AND ONLY IF the pad runs on 1.25VDC, and you parallel the 2 AAs to get 1.25VDC @ 4600mAh.

      If, as is more likely, the device runs on about 7VDC, you would need 12 2300mAh AAs running series/parallel (2 parallel strings of 6 batteries in series) to give you that time.

      Remember - amp-hours ARE NOT energy - they are CHARGE. You need to take amp-hours times voltage to get units of energy (watt-hours).
    6. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It runs on 3.7V

    7. Re:Battery Life by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Never mind travelling. Even during an ordinary work day, you're often going to be away from your desk for more than 3 hours at a time.

    8. Re:Battery Life by mikelang · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I would also prefer something even larger but with 24h+ battery life.

    9. Re:Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is 3 hours of browsing time, not general battery life. The wireless lan chip is a pig for power consumption. It is not unique in this case, as phones have the same problems (Have you ever tried surfing for any lengthy period of time on a 9500 Communicator?). As the 770 uses a standard phone battery, these times are to be expected.

    10. Re:Battery Life by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

      Yet people use laptops with short battery life for many of the functions this could replace.

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
  12. Stylus by teiresias · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been using my Gateway tablet for about half a year now and while the stylus works and works well, it's not something I felt the same level of comfort using as I do when I use a pen or pencil. My guess would be that the stlus seems to slip more over the very slick screen.

    In regards to the Nokia 770, the stylus seems to be the primary form of input and command for this device. Unless Nokia has changed the feel of stylus, this might hurt adopters of what looks like a neat PDA/tablet hybrid. Indeed, implementing a small keyboard similiar to the Sharp Zaurus PDA's would be very nice.

    --
    -Teiresias
    1. Re:Stylus by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Or maybe a bluetooth keyboard or IR keyboard. I seem to recall seeing some cute little folding bluetooth keyboards a while back. In fact ThinkGeek has one.

      Input methods and battery life have been the two major reasons I haven't purchased a PDA since the Palm V. You could go weeks between recharging your Palm, while you're lucky to get through a day with the latest crop. I got sick of grafitti after a while, too. Sony's Clie looked promising but the ones with the keyboards were inevitably more than I wanted to pay for a PDA. So I'm doing without until I can get one with all the features I want.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Stylus by Combuchan · · Score: 1

      A screen protector vastly helps with the plastic on slick surface issue. It makes writingly substantially easier.

      Nobody says you have to use the stylus that comes with. They sell multifunction pen/stylus devices the size of a regular ballpoint pen for about US$10 - $20.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
  13. Better picture by BenBenBen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here

    I've seen $350 quoted as a price point - once more and more devices start offering control access over TCP/IP (think TiVoweb, Xbox Media Centre etc) I think we've got a good candidate for the much-trumpeted "terminal" device that everyone uses around the home. I had the PSP pegged as a good place to start, providing a vibrant homebrew community springs up around it. This Nokia device offers that sort of functionality and development possibilites right out the box.

    --
    The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    1. Re:Better picture by JaseOne · · Score: 1

      The PSP isn't suited for such a device at all, how are you going to easily get input into it? Heck a multi-function IR remote would be better than a PSP, using the control pad, analog stick or buttons just is not a viable input method for doing just about anything other than play games or watch movies (or listen to music I guess but I prefer something I can fit in my pocket for that).

      I fail to see how people keep touting the PSP as this great multi-function device and how cool it will be once an official web browser is released, yeah that is until you get sick of typing in URL's via the on screen keyboard, heck it pisses me off no end just typing in things like the name of a wireless network I can't imagine typing something like a reply to a Slashdot post on it.

      Except for the lack of an IR port the DS with it's touch screen is much more suited as a multi function device. I can just see a browser being released with the browser on the top screen and the keyboard along with scroll bars on the bottom touch screen, now that would be nifty!

  14. PDA please! by johansalk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks exciting; can't wait for them to make a PDA out of it. I just wish they'd used regular SD instead of reduced size memory cards.

    1. Re:PDA please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things at least; rs-mmc takes less space, and there were no Linux drivers available for SD until a week or two ago (and those weren't developed by Nokia).

    2. Re:PDA please! by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need special drivers to talk to an SD. You can interface with an unencrypted SD card just like any old MMC.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:PDA please! by nxtw · · Score: 1

      No, you don't need special drivers, but you need to pay for the specifications for the high-speed SD card interface or be forced to retrieve data from the card using a slow serial interface.

    4. Re:PDA please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regular SD has patent and licensing issues, which is why its MMC instead

  15. It's $350 by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not sure where you got the price from, but my sources say it's going to be $350.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:It's $350 by anagama · · Score: 1

      That's a really great price and this looks like a really cool device. I just wish they had gone with compact flash instead of the card format they chose. It would be nice to be able to slap in a couple gigs of extra memory.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  16. No CF slot? by elementalist · · Score: 1

    Why do manufacturers hate CF so? More over, mini-mmc? Was there not enough flash formats?

    1. Re:No CF slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hy do manufacturers hate CF so? More over, mini-mmc?

      size,weight

    2. Re:No CF slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you get a 5GB hard drive in mini-MMC format, then?

      Thought not.

    3. Re:No CF slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but you can at least get 2GB RS-MMC cards. And sure, a mini hard drive is cool, but when the physical space (and power consumption) is a limiting factor, the fact that CF provides more storage space isn't really relevant.

    4. Re:No CF slot? by iamnotanumber6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why do manufacturers hate CF so?

      Because CF is based on the ancient ISA parallel bus interface - too many pins, too much overhead. The newer formats use a serial (eg. SPI) interface, more easily supported by microsontrollers, saving a lot of wiring and board space/complexity.

    5. Re:No CF slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if you want to compete with the iPod Mini - this thing can't, and people aren't gonna want to carry THREE pocket weights around.

    6. Re:No CF slot? by bacademy · · Score: 1

      Well, most new Nokia phones have RC-MMC. Those are much smaller than CF, for a comparable price. At least 512Mb units are available for about $50-$60.

      --
      http://bacademy.com/
    7. Re:No CF slot? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Never thought of it that way. Thanks.

    8. Re:No CF slot? by nxtw · · Score: 1
      Why RS-MMC? Why not SD, which is many times more popular, or even a derivative of SD? The fees to implement SD* can't be that much, and a device of this size can surely support it.....

      * -- see http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=15065 2&cid=12640564

  17. How do I type on this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to enter some password protected sites and the stylus thing is not really adequate for typing ***** kind of passwords.
    OTOH, most password protected sites will work well only with IE and not w other browsers.

    1. Re:How do I type on this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's also a virtual keyboard and text recognition.

    2. Re:How do I type on this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to enter some password protected sites and the stylus thing is not really adequate for typing ***** kind of passwords.

      Why would you choose ***** as your password anyway? Most of us use alpha-numeric characters.

    3. Re:How do I type on this thing? by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      OTOH, most password protected sites will work well only with IE and not w other browsers.

      Um, no. Most password protected sites work just fine with other browsers.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  18. what about KDE/Qt? by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 1

    Since it supports Linux and X11, will it run and support KDE/Qt development?

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:what about KDE/Qt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Since it supports Linux and X11, will it run and support KDE/Qt development?

      Dont see any reason why it wouldn't.
      http://www.maemo.org/
      Should be easy enough to get Qtopia running on it, if you dont mind using up precious storage space.

  19. Holy Crap! Sign me up! by MeBadMagic · · Score: 1

    This looks like what I've been waiting for. I didn't see any Office apps (OOo). This might be just the thing to convince my boss to get 2 of. One for him, and one for me to learn how to help him use his....

    B=)

    --
    A friend will come and bail you out of jail, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "damn that was fun!"
  20. A phone? by MoobY · · Score: 1

    Hm these guys at Nokia forgot putting a mobile phone into this thing...

    --
    --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    1. Re:A phone? by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1
      From the full feature list:
      The Nokia 770 Internet Tablet's software is upgradeable and currently runs on the Linux-based Internet Tablet 2005 software edition. There is a planned launch next year of an operating system upgrade - the Internet Tablet 2006 software addition - that will support additional services, including Internet telephony (VoIP) and Instant Messaging.
      So in 2006, this gadget can be used as a WI-FI VoIP phone. This shall be very interesting.
    2. Re:A phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the 9500 Communicator! It has all the features 770 tablet has plus it is a phone!

  21. ... but shame on you, Nokia... by lowieken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    for wanting to impose software patents on us in the EU!

    1. Re:... but shame on you, Nokia... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Nokia is really mixed up in these matters:

      • it supports open source stuff like this
      • supports the anti-microsoft side in eu vs. microsoft battle
      • on the other hand, supports software patents

      I'd wish they'd just make up their mind and vouch for FOSS
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:... but shame on you, Nokia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we need to take into account that the Nokia is huge. When I say "huge" it means "really really really big". And it has different parts, which have different opinions on different issues.

      It's pretty possible that one part would vote for FOSS :D

    3. Re:... but shame on you, Nokia... by labratuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A company's right hand not knowing what its left hand is doing is nothing new.

      A future with EU software patents is a future where tech companies have more lawyers employed than developers. My guess is that the people in charge of Nokia's stance on patents... are lawyers.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  22. High-res images on Nokia press site by tsvk · · Score: 1

    Nokia's press site has some high-resolution images.

  23. What will it cost? by Petrus · · Score: 1

    I'll buy one if it is under $500 and bunch of them if they make the cost under $200.
    Did anyone see any word about the target price?

    1. Re:What will it cost? by Ionizer7 · · Score: 1

      estimated price is $350.

  24. At $350 I'm in! by cloricus · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing that is USD... I paid $600AUD for my iPod which never leaves my right pocket. I cannot live without it. I'm looking at this and thinking this could take its place living in my left pocket as some thing I also wouldn't be able to live without. Looking at the specs and the fact that it is all Linux/FOSS I think it is some thing worth supporting, if it comes in at under $1000AUD I'm going to be down at the shops first day it is out in Australia buying one. :)

    --
    I ate your fish.
  25. Re:Holy Crap! Sign me up! by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice is way too big for the limited storage space on these things, you wont be storing your Mp3 collection on it either.

  26. It will fail by lelitsch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not because of the price, but because it doesn't have any meaningful storage options. 128MB Flash is not going to do anything for movies, images or other downloads. Now if they'd put in a hard drive, or a expansion slot so you can get a few gigs of storage, you could download a movie to watch when you get out of range of broadband. And even in a few years, that's still going to be a lot of places. Ten years from now, wireless broadband will be truely everywhere, but even in places like Japan and Korea it's fiarly common to get out of 3G or WiFiMax range.

    1. Re:It will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about using large volume reduced size MMC cards?

    2. Re:It will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      512MB costs just 40 euros these days. Next year you can probably get a gig for that price.

    3. Re:It will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'd like to know is why nobody has advanced the idea of some form of interconnectivity between say something like this tablet and a portable storage device like an iRiver or an iPod.

      I mean, I've already got 20 gigs sitting in my pocket, why not plug that into the tablet (or a pda) and I've got instant storage?

      I suppose part of the answer is embedded in the DMCA - they don't want people lugging portables around swapping music and movies on the fly - P2P network via meatspace indeed!

      But to me, it's always seemed a bit odd that most of these devices offer methods of interfacing with a PC, but no method of interfacing with one another. Shouldn't be too hard to solve!

    4. Re:It will fail by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BS. My pda has 128mb built in, and has an SD slot. I have no problems with storage. Besides, how much storage do you need for browsing, mail, etc.? This isn't a portable dvd-player.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:It will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is never meant to be something to be used unthethered from a Wi-Fi network. You're just asking too much of a relatively cheap product. I can already envision me surfing the files off of my external hard disk connected to the media server served off a wireless router. This device is already fine as it is, If you want a hard disk, get an Archos or some other PMP.

    6. Re:It will fail by Combuchan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, we'll have wireless broadband everywhere, but only so you may legitimately download Approved Content(tm) from Vericingusprint, and they'll continue charging outrageous prices for even sending a kilobyte of data. Lord help you if you want unproxied HTTP or TCP with enough ports open to do any real work.

      That is, there might be broadband everywhere in a few years, just don't count on using it.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    7. Re:It will fail by anagama · · Score: 1

      There is no reason that this device should be solely for browsing the web or checking email. In fact, they make a big deal about all the media formats it supports:

      • Audio: MP3, Real Audio, MPEG4, AAC, WAV, AMR, MP2
      • Image: JPEG, GIF, BMP, TIFF, PNG, Animated GIF format, SVG-tiny, ICO
      • Video: MPEG1, MPEG4, Real Video, H.263, AVI, 3GP

      I have an MP3 player from a while back, 64mb built in with 128mb card -- 192 mbs is really not adequate. You have to carefully select and predict what you want to listen to with that little space. No room for spontaneity. My camera has a 128 mb card. For good picture quality, that's 70 pics. Wanna show friends some pictures -- make sure to carefully select and plan ahead. Want to have some portable porn? Better be a quickie. And last, what movie is going to fit into this space? Why even make it video capable if there is no storage?

      My first impression of this was "COOL" - perfect thing to pack along on an extended motorcycle trip where limited space makes even a laptop seem too big. But as I consider the storage limitations intentionally built in to the device, it seems more and more like a toy instead of something useful. Other than not competing with the iPod, why would they cripple it this way? There is no good reason. With CF, you could have a gig of storage for $100, and several if you are willing to spring for the "big" cards. This thing would suddenly be able to function pretty close to a real computer. Right now, it's a toy. I'm feeling burned and I haven't even bought it. If it had CF, I'd be in line to get one first day out.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    8. Re:It will fail by fm6 · · Score: 1
      So you want to sit down and watch a movie, but you can't be bothered to find a hotspot? Whatever. You can't dismiss a device just because it doesn't support a minor need -- one already met by existing products. Nokia is a wireless company, so of course they hardware assumes that connectivity is available.

      Battery life is more of an issue.

    9. Re:It will fail by juhaz · · Score: 1

      512MB RS-MMC cards are cheap and enough for everything expect video, and you can still have the gig, it currently costs bit more than $100, but the prices will come down soon enough.

      CF/PCMCIA is electrically ancient, and takes ton of the most valuable resource you have - circuit board space. Who knows how much larger it would have to be to accommodate that monster. You don't even have ISA bus that these things basically are in your PC any more, why on earth would anyone want them in a handheld.

      As for feeling burned, well, you're free to be burned by every time someone comes up with a product that doesn't include you in the target category, but that just makes you an idiot.

  27. Compared To? by simpl3x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What can you compare this to? The Palm devices? It seems to have a good screen 800 x 600, Wi-Fi... I can imagine teachers carrying something like this around to hold teacher edition texts, and accessing the school network. IMHO, this is very cool, and could open up a lot of opportuniity in web applications for verticle markets.

    I wish it had a sim card, and I hope that they offer a keyboard tray of some sort.

    1. Re:Compared To? by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Since it has bluetooth, just use something like the frogpad.

    2. Re:Compared To? by Hast · · Score: 1

      I'd compare it to devices like the Sony U50/U70. Only those don't have Bluetooth. (And are only available in Japan.)

    3. Re:Compared To? by gman99 · · Score: 1

      I hope that they offer a keyboard tray of some sort.

      It has bluetooth support. Get any bluetooth wireless keyboard, or this one from Nokia.

      I wish it had a sim card

      Try the 7710 instead. Granted, that does not run Linux (its a Symbian Series 90 device); Tis device (the 770) is more of a screen enlarger for those with existing mobiles (with bluetooth)

    4. Re:Compared To? by guanxi · · Score: 1

      What can you compare this to?

      I recently spent time researching hi-resolution handhelds (VGA or better). Here's a list for you to google. All vary in specs, but are comparable; some are import only, recently retired and/or available "soon".

      * oqo
      * Samsung Nexio S160 and XP30
      * Fujitsu LOOX 718, 720, v70, and .U Pocket,
      * Sharp Zaurus SL-C3000, -1000, -860, -760
      * Dell Axim X50v
      * HP hx4700
      * Asus MyPal a730
      * Toshiba e830
      * Sony PCG-U101, VGN-U71, VGN-U50
      * NTTDocomo Sigmarion III
      * Psion / PsionTeklogix Netbook Pro 3000
      * Danger Hiptop2 ( VGA)
      * Tiqit Tiqit
      * Vulcan Flipstart
      * Voq Professional Phone ( VGA)
      * HTC Blue Angel (rebranded as Audiovox XV6600, among others; VGA; but some models run on EV-DO networks(!))

    5. Re:Compared To? by guanxi · · Score: 1

      #@$@! Slashdot removed the lesser than signs in front of VGA, which I guess I should have expected.

      Anywhere in the list you see VGA , it should be < VGA (i.e. less than VGA).

  28. Apps by Kludge · · Score: 1

    If it's really running X and GTK, apps galore already abound. SWEET!

    1. Re:Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, it really runs x11, and the UI is based on gtk+. Existing gtk+ apps should run with no modifications, as long as they dont have multi window UI (think gimp with rstpoison). you will need few special files for your app to be launchable.

      Making the app fit the ui well takes some time, you need to use hildon-API's classes instead of GtkWindow. this shouldn't require too much effort.

      the screen size sets some limitations, especially, wwhen the virtual keyboard is visible (when gtk text input is active) Qt development is technically possible, but the keyboard is gtk input method, so you will be in trouble.

      and about OOo, not only is it too big on disk, it's also too memory and cpu hungry.

  29. No it won't by dcrocha · · Score: 2, Informative

    It only supports GTK user interfaces. I have direct contact with people on that project and that's something that will not change for now.

    1. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With an extensive SDK becoming available, I don't see why you wouldn't be able to compile whatever you want for it.

      I bet that there's nothing that prevents you from running other toolkits there.

    2. Re:No it won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, there's no reason why you couldn't use Qt to build apps for the device.

      You will get into some trouble, if you want it to look like it belonged to the device. The device's normal menu opens from the "title bar", while qt has a menu bar.

      Another problem is that the virtual keyboard (and hand writing recognition) are implemented as gtk+ input methods, so you will need some big hack, or have your own vkb for qt.

  30. AP says it runs Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic le/2005/05/25/AR2005052500555.html
    "In one similarity to Nokia's smart phones, the tablet employs the Opera browser from Opera Software ASA."
  31. Nokia = EU Patent Hog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, apparently Nokia wants to have their Linux cake and kill it, too, considering that they were the major player in getting at least the Finnish govt. to vote for the disastrous and controversial software patent directive.

    Not buying this from them.

    (Roughly the same criticism, of course, applies to other companies such as IBM as well, but at least said IBM has started to put some of their patents out there. Which doesn't really negate their lobbying sins, but it's a start.)

    1. Re:Nokia = EU Patent Hog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about them lobbying against software patents if they ever want to be taken seriously?

    2. Re:Nokia = EU Patent Hog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about it? It would be nice if it were that simple :)

  32. Blog name by eGuy · · Score: 1

    Maemo will need a name for their blog/planet. How about Maemo-gram

  33. which browser ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which browser software is installed ?

    Firefox ? Opera ? Konqueror ? Another one ?

    1. Re:which browser ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera

  34. Forget ethernet, no bluetooth??!!! by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 0

    I know it kind of goes against the whole portability idea, but no ethernet?

    This would be the perfect cheap 'terminal' for bluetooth phones with internet but screens that are too small. With a MSRP of $350 I am sure we will be seeing those for $299 very soon, so it's way cheaper than most PDAs.

    I agree that the WiFi only decision is a bit disappointing.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:Forget ethernet, no bluetooth??!!! by noisymime · · Score: 1

      ummmm it has bluetooth.....

    2. Re:Forget ethernet, no bluetooth??!!! by tuxnduke · · Score: 3, Informative

      What do you mean no bluetooth ?

      (Straight from the site:)
      Connectivity:
      * WLAN: 802.11b/g
      * Bluetooth specification: 1.2

  35. Limited until... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

    I guess this device will be limited in its flexibility to make it easier to use for the average joe. I'm waiting for a project like Familiar and/or GPE (famous for their iPAQ system) to port their stuff to the device...really sweet then :-)

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    1. Re:Limited until... by Raphael · · Score: 1
      I'm waiting for a project like Familiar and/or GPE (famous for their iPAQ system) to port their stuff to the device

      That should not be necessary. I am a big fan of Familiar and GPE, having installed them on several iPAQs. You will recognize that Maemo and GPE have a lot of things in common such as GTK+, Matchbox and many other parts of their respective platforms (check the Maemo SDK for more info about the platform).

      With Maemo, Nokia has done a great job in polishing the user interface and cleaning up several libraries. I don't think that replacing it with GPE would make much sense, as it would be a step backwards. On the other hand, I think that both projects can benefit from each other.

      --
      -Raphaël
    2. Re:Limited until... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      I'm more hoping to get the ipkg package system working on that thing, being able to install additional software would be extremely cool. Consider how many custom packages there are for iPAQ/Familiar or Linksys WRT54G/OpenWRT (uses ipkg as well) devices, Nokia should be interested in getting a huge boost in application availability through the big OSS community.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    3. Re:Limited until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use normal .deb:s. It is Debian-based, after all =) I think that the amount of packages available for Debian is quite a lot bigger than the number of apps for Familiar/OpenWRT...

    4. Re:Limited until... by Raphael · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm more hoping to get the ipkg package system working on that thing,

      Yes, ipkg is nice. It is derived from Debian's dpkg. The good news for you is that maemo uses dpkg directly.

      See for example the sections "Creating debian/ directory" and "Creating package" near the end of the howto for creating a new application. Another example can be found in the howto for porting an existing application.

      Maemo is probably more open than you think...

      --
      -Raphaël
    5. Re:Limited until... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      Maemo is probably more open than you think...

      I hope so, it's a point I where I gladly stand corrected. But AFAIR maemo is only the development platform? Hopefully much of this openness will remain in the end user product.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    6. Re:Limited until... by Karora · · Score: 1


      Yeah, and ain't it interesting that this year's DebConf is in Helsinki, Finland, and that it's at least partly sponsored by Nokia...

      I'm off to Helsinki for Debconf5 in five weeks myself, and I'm hoping to see if I can lay my grubby little mitts on one of these devicen :-)

      --

      ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
  36. And then be disappointed by sjf · · Score: 1

    my Nokia trinitron monitor's interface sucks. My Nokia cellphone's interface is fine, but nothing to be excited about. But then none of these devices run Linux. My Tivo has a pretty good interface for what it does, and that IS running on Linux, but I would caution anyone from concluding that since the TiVo is easy to use Linux is easy to use.

    Linux is free and customizable: companies with good designers and UI engineers can put good interfaces on top of it.

  37. hmmmm by HaydnH · · Score: 1

    2 days after I baught a Treo 650 on a 2 year contract... bugger!

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:hmmmm by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      This device is not actually a phone, so I wouldn't worry about it. It can connect to a phone via BlueTooth, but that's about it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:hmmmm by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      ohhhh... just saw "after a software upgrade it will be VOIP compatible" in the specs and assumed it must have a speaker/microphone, hence assumed it was also a phone - it's true what they say, it's the mother of all ........

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  38. I can't swallow that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...

    Well then good news! It's a suppository!

  39. Could be perfect for CarPCs by sonny317 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the screen is bright enough to be daylight readable as some of the outdoor press shots would suggest, you have a very compact, removable linux-based media engine with hi-res touchscreen and navigation buttons. If much of any developer community adopts it (hard to imagine it wouldn't), there will probably be support for all sorts of additional media formats and peripherals. Given that current sunlight-readable VGA touchscreens cost ~$3-5 hundred USD alone, this could easily knock the price of building a carpc setup in half.

  40. you're in luck by cahiha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's open source and it's X11 based. That means that RandR probably works on it and you can just rotate the screen 180 degrees.

  41. Mod Grandparent, '-1 Retard' by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    What do you mean no bluetooth ? (Straight from the site:) Connectivity: * WLAN: 802.11b/g * Bluetooth specification: 1.2

    ...Guess skipping all those reading and comprehension classes in high school wasn't such a good idea after all.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  42. should work by cahiha · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, it should: since it is X11 based and since KDE and Gnome have worked on standardizing common desktop features between them, Qt and KDE applications should work pretty well on it.

    Furthermore, deriving a KDE handheld environment from the KDE desktop software should not be much work.

    This is the way handheld Linux software should be done. Qt/Embedded and Qtopia's approach is unnecessarily exclusionary: with Qt/Embedded, you cannot realistically use any non-Qt GUI applications on the handheld.

  43. maemo - its all 'open' by kerskine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just did a quick read of the licenses section of the FAQ. They've released the UI, Skins, and Graphics under the Creative Commons (CC) license. I guess they want to see maemo used on other platforms (assuming the license fee for the graphics is reasonable).

    --
    ****

    "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
    1. Re:maemo - its all 'open' by antrik · · Score: 1

      "The" Creative Commons License? There are a whole bunch of licenses in the Creative Commons framework; and they are quite different in the amount of freedom they offer.

      maemo uses the Creative Commons Attribution license, which is free; but you always need to mention the whole name when talking about Creative Commons. The more restrictive licenses in the framework are still better than the usual proprietary licenses; but -- while they might be sufficient for typical artwork like songs or novels -- many of the Creative Commons licenses are *not* suitable for use in free software projects. For those, you need a license that offers the same amount of freedom as for the code. So be careful, and always check *which* of the Creative Commons licenses actually was used.

      --
      All my comments get moderated +-0, spotless.
  44. MMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every Nokia spec I've seen touts MMC instead of the widespread SD standard.

    Any chance it's going to be different with this device ?

    1. Re:MMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it uses rs-mmc (reduced size MMC). There isn't any rs-sd yet, afaik.

    2. Re:MMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why's that? All RS-MMC cards come with adapters which makes it possible to use them in any MMC using devices too, and almost all devices that support SD also support MMC. Seems there's no need to complain. It's not like the cards are expensive. 40EUR for a 512MB card...

    3. Re:MMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got loads of SD cards, including several 1G ones. SD is everywhere, (RS-)MMC is not. I stick to widespread standards only.

      If Nokia doesn't want to play ball, it won't get my business. Same goes for Sony, who can stick their stick where the sun don't shine.

  45. Screenshots! by spectrokid · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  46. Wait! No hard drive storage specification? by serverleader · · Score: 1

    So.. I can't store a 600mb video on this thing?

    I think I will keep in mind the new LifeDrive (palm http://www.palmone.com/us/products/mobilemanagers/ lifedrive/) , essentially a cross between a mobile media player, portable hard drive and an organizer.

    Which has 4 gigabytes of internal storage and a high-resolution screen for on-the-road access to music, video, digital photos, e-mail and office documents.

    --
    - - - - - . .. . - Get Counted!
    1. Re:Wait! No hard drive storage specification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy yourself a 1GB RS-MMC card... Then again, the main purpose of this device isn't as a multimedia player.

      Oh, and you'd call 320x480 high resolution? That's stretching it a bit, right? The Nokia 770 does 800x480...

    2. Re:Wait! No hard drive storage specification? by apathyonline · · Score: 1

      The lifedrive is also slow because of the hard drive

      --

      Tired of Apathy? http://apathyonline.net
  47. I want one! by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  48. Great device, but from Nokia???? by theolein · · Score: 1

    While a device this size is a fantastic idea, if it works as a notepad and sketchbook while playing mp3's, and would be an ideal device for students as it's far less bulky than regular Tablets, I somehow have the feeling that it is going to die a silent death because Nokia is not known for its intuition in the market.

    Remember the NGage? While Nokia makes very good mobile phones, they almost always seem to lack a feeling of just how gadgets and devices should be used. For instance, if the screen is too small on this device, people won't use it for making long notes or sketches. If the memory is too frugal people won't load songs and other data onto it.

    I wish somehow that Apple would make a device like this. I think they would "get it right", i.e. big enough for a student to use productively but not so big as to be bulky, with enough memory for data storage and built in iTunes for songs.

    1. Re:Great device, but from Nokia???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of what you said, but there is nothing wrong with a 800x480 touchscreen on this tiny thing, the screen is fantastic!

      Also, just because Apple marketed the iPod into the history books doesn't make it a better, more useful, or more intuitive MP3 player.

      Apple bought their esthetic design from Sony http://www.lowendmac.com/pb/100.shtml, and stuck to it. As the Rolling Stones did they just wait to see what will be popular; copy, add some clear plastic and round edges, double the price, and market the hell out of it.

      When they don't, they end up with the Apple Lisa ($10000 computer), and the iPod Photo ($500 mp3 player).

    2. Re:Great device, but from Nokia???? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. As a student, I can say it's almost perfect for me. But the difference between "almost perfect" and "perfect" is like the fine line between love and hate: In other words, it's actually useless.

      To be useful, it needs exactly two things: a normal aspect-ratio screen, so that it can function like a sheet of paper (e.g. letter size scaled 50%, or A4), and either a hard drive or a CF slot for more storage. So yeah, your comment about the screen size and storage amount was right on the mark.

      There's also one other thing I'm concerned about: thickness. It's easier to write on something thin sitting on the table in front of you, especially when it's small enough that you can't rest your hand on it. It ought to be about 1/4 inch thick, and absolutely no thicker than 1/2 an inch.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Great device, but from Nokia???? by nmos · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if it had (or gained later?) the ability to rotate the display like my Zarus. You're right on the writing comfort issue though but it's not just the thickness. There is something about using a stylus on a screen that just doesn't feel as precise as using a pen on paper. On the other hand, having years worth of notes with you beats sorting through a box of note pads any day.

    4. Re:Great device, but from Nokia???? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Nokia is not known for its intuition in the market.


      Which is why they are by far the biggest player in the mobile-phone business: By providing products no-one wants to use.

      Remember the NGage?


      Ah yes, since Nokia has a product that flopped, their all non-phone products are doomed to fail as well?

      Remember the Communicator? It was released years (in 1996 IIRC) before any other PDA-Phones, and it was a phenomenal success. it was the shape of things to come and they were years ahead of everyone else.

      if the screen is too small on this device, people won't use it for making long notes or sketches.


      If the screen is too big, the device gets so big that people wont carry it around.

      I wish somehow that Apple would make a device like this. I think they would "get it right"


      No matter what the fanboys try to tell you, they don't always "get it right". Remember the Cube? Great machine, true, but WAY overpriced.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  49. Can it run NX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soooo.... if it has X11 technology -- can it also run an NX client?

    If it does, any internet connection would present the opportunity to me to also connect to my FreeNX or my NoMachine NX server... (Yes, I run _both_, and they are great!)

  50. Nokia PDA??? by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

    So, the PDA is dead and is to be replaced by the smartphone - and now Nokia are producing a handheld which isn't a phone. Weird...

  51. Liferea by Netsensei · · Score: 1

    Great! From TFA I saw one of the feats will be: news reader. So you would be able to subscribe to your fav feeds. Indispensable to a good pda with web capabilities, me thinks.

    Even better: noticing on the screenshots they've included my fav newsreader: liferea!

  52. Nokia chooses Opera, not Firefox, for browser by Rits · · Score: 1

    Nokia still chooses Opera, not Firefox, for its browser. It will be interesting to see when Minimo is finally capable of running meaningfully on a device that weighs 230 grams.

    I think this device looks great, especially when it is closed.

    --
    If you don't like having choices made for you, you should start making your own. - Neal Stephenson
    1. Re:Nokia chooses Opera, not Firefox, for browser by Raphael · · Score: 1
      Nokia still chooses Opera, not Firefox, for its browser.

      Hmmm... Did you check Gtk+ WebCore, sponsored by Nokia?

      They also contributed a bit to Minimo although they probably do not consider it to be fully usable yet.

      --
      -Raphaël
  53. USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a USB-port

    Would it be able to feed a USB-harddrive?

    1. Re:USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nopes. There's no way that a battery powered device (unless you have something the size of a laptop battery, and even laptops have problems with hostmode sometimes for more power consuming devices) can do hostmode for a storage device.

    2. Re:USB by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Just because it's a hard drive does not mean that it can't pull under 500uA @ 5V (a powered USB port's power output)...

      A 1.8" drive pulls ~1.5W at full load, 3.3V. Simple math says that that's under 500uA - for 3.3V, so less for 5V.

      However, I think that the real problem is that the USB port is most likely a USB client, not a USB host. If it's a client, and USB OTG isn't supported, then forget about hooking anything up, unless it's a USB host.

  54. what it looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. Will it be able to play a complete movie ? by serverleader · · Score: 1

    you got a point there !... I just love the linux part.. so i can write my gtk apps!! that's my main reason of getting one.. You guys think the battery will allow to watch a complete movie? with out having to stop in the middle and recharge ?

    --
    - - - - - . .. . - Get Counted!
    1. Re:Will it be able to play a complete movie ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The thing that'll consume most power is most probably the WLAN, hence the low estimated runtime when surfing, so unless you're streaming the video, it shouldn't be a problem.

  56. Re:Maemo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would not believe (while I know for sure as I'm a member of the team): actually kudos goes to pwgen :)

  57. From the Maemo Tutorial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Modified Hildon GTK+ is more suitable for embedded device, but it's still binary-compatible with normal GTK+. So no changes are needed to make current GTK+ applications run in maemo, although they don't appear as native maemo applications without small changes listed in this document."

    Can you say portable GIMP with a stylus (or any other GTK+ app for that matter =). From my perspective making Maemo compatable with existing Linux apps (granted did go with GTK+ instead of QT, but I can see the QT community changing that pretty quickly) is a huge bonus. Now the big question is, how much back-end (ie: command line. Okay, so I'm a CL geek, can't help it =) is available through the device. Overall, after spending a few hours researching what's available (which isn't much, and what is available is much more expensive than this) this product looks pretty solid, especially with the completely Free software approach. So far my big gripe is that it isn't based on slackware (Can't have everything, and no offense intended to the Debian crowd ;).

  58. No 3G/GSM? by ubera · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's a pity that the rather beautiful design and obviously neat software doesn't include Nokia's core function: mobile phone connectivity (and not through BT).

    --
    But what is the SIGnificance?
    1. Re:No 3G/GSM? by bfl · · Score: 1

      It supports AMR, which is the 3GPP standard codec. I'm guessing they'll use AMR with VoIP for voice connectivity, that way they can link in with 3G systems without transcoding.

    2. Re:No 3G/GSM? by Hast · · Score: 1

      And good riddance to it. Personally I find it a bonus that it doesn't have a phone in it. I laready have phones that have BT, I don't need another one.

      And it allows the platform to be more open than if you have to adhere to the strict rules for mobile phones.

      For me the inclusion of a phone would have ment no-sale. This way it seems interesting.

  59. Re:The real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to believe that we made every effort to make it rather impossible. :)

  60. The uses cases by asv108 · · Score: 1
    shown in the flash on the page linked, all seem like smartphone use cases to me. Almost all of them can be summed up with "Use internet for short time periods."

    Sounds like what most people use their Treos for, but why would i want to carry around this large device that can only connect to the net if I happen to be in area with open wifi? For instance the Airport use case, if I wanted to do a quick e-mail check using airport wifi it would be ~$8/hr in most Airports. With a smartphone, most users would already have an unlimited data plan.

    1. Re:The uses cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you might want to carry "this big device" (which isn't THAT big, after all) because it does have WiFi :-) 802.11b/g

      Enjoy your 54MBit connection! :-)

    2. Re:The uses cases by iamnotanumber6 · · Score: 1

      ...can only connect to the net if I happen to be in area with open wifi?

      you can also connect it to the net through your regular mobile phone, with bluetooth.

      personally i like the idea that my phone is just a phone, and not some huge thing with a qwerty keyboard to hold up to my face. and if i want something for messaging/internet, i'd rather have something with a nice interface and screen like this.

  61. Some good signs though by hemul · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Some good signs though by VStrider · · Score: 1

      "Nokia Corporation announced today that it allows all its patents to be used in the further development of the Linux Kernel."
      ...
      "With respect to new functionality introduced into future Linux Kernel releases, Nokia reserves the right to declare that the Patent Statement shall not apply."

      So basically they are saying they won't sue anyone at the moment but they might change their mind in the future.

      --
      VStrider.
    2. Re:Some good signs though by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Not exactly. If they're being honest, and trying to keep to the letter and spirit of the GPL, they're not going to sue as long as future versions of the kernel do not infringe on their patents in ways it doesn't already today.

      That's difficult to word (bet the above looks pretty convoluted as it is), so let me put it this way. Suppose the kernel contains a routine to implement a GSM protocol that happens to infringe on Nokia's patents. Nokia are saying "That's fine", and are obliged to treat it as fine as long as the future implementations that infringe upon that patent are based directly on that code.

      Now suppose someone unrelated adds code, without modifying the above, to support, I don't know, an iDEN protocol, and it happens that this entirely new code also infringes upon Nokia's patents. In this case, Nokia probably has the right to sue, and is saying they may do so depending on whether they feel it's worth their while or not.

      The way around this is probably for the iDEN code submitters to base their code on the Nokia's submitted GSM code.

      In this respect, I suspect Nokia's statement is a little disingenious given that if they weren't to engage in this policy, they would be violating the GPL by providing Linux with the handheld in the first place. But it certainly shouldn't be read as saying that they may sue those who redistribute or use a future version of the Linux kernel that contains no new code revelent to Nokia's patents.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  62. Almost there... by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

    Everything I want except Outlook Sync and storage for a movie or two...

    Keep trying Palm and Nokia, you've almost got it!

    Newton II where are you?

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    1. Re:Almost there... by Saanvik · · Score: 1
      I agree, this device is really, really close to what I want.

      The screen resolution makes it much nicer, for me, than the LifeDrive, but having to buy mini-sd cards for storage is a negative that you don't have with the LifeDrive.

      When you say Outlook sync, I assume you mean calendar and task syncing, right? I'm sure, if it doesn't come with that out of the box, someone will create an application that does it. It's probably one of the most common use cases currently for such a device.

      Two negatives about this device for me. Battery life, and no keyboard. Thank goodness it has bluetooth so you can get a bluetooth keyboard. However, without a built in keyboard, it will become, for most users, nearly a read-only device.

    2. Re:Almost there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know of very few devices that get better battery time than that when using using wireless constantly. The idle use time isn't bad.

    3. Re:Almost there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure Nokia smartphones already offer Outlook synchronization. The PC Suite application they come with is pretty decent but I doubt many people ever even try it.

  63. No 3G or GPRS by jd+0001 · · Score: 1

    Seems like a mistake not include any kind of connectivity that works away from the home/office. What if I want to browse whilst sitting on a train?

    1. Re:No 3G or GPRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you use it together with your bluetooth equipped cellphone.

    2. Re:No 3G or GPRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, it does have bluetooth. Get a bluetooth enabled phone and hook them up and you have your connectivity. This will allow you to have a smaller phone to use as an actual phone and you can then use this device just when you want internet or it's other features instead of having to carry something large around just because you may need to make a phone call.

    3. Re:No 3G or GPRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can already do that with a Palm - I want something BETTER.

  64. Linux hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "OMG, How cool hardware! Let's hack it and install Linux... oh, wait... :/"

  65. Re:The real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anything?

    I mean, really?

  66. Archos did it before. by jonathan3003 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Similar (and better) devices already exist.

    See, for example, the PMA400.

    It is open source, linux based, has a 30gb hd, and has many other goodies.

    But it is still nice to see that a large company like nokia is offering such a product. It will definitely help to spread linux :)

    1. Re:Archos did it before. by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      But I could almost buy an iBook for the price of the Archos. Looks like a great device, but -- ouch -- the price!

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  67. Another option... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    I doubt there will be a left-handed model. Pretty much every PDA or device like this one has buttons on the left side, which I can't use because I'm holding the device with my right hand because I need to write on it with my left hand.

    Not trying to state the expensive-but-obvious alternative, but have you considered a Zaurus c1000/c3000 import? They both have all hte buttons on the right side and below the keyboard. Folded, it looks to be about the same size too.

    It is expensive, though. that said, I love mine and have gotten every penny out of it with daily use.

  68. Here's why /.ers MUST hate it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It already has Linux on it, so it doesn't give you the opportunity to pay to snuff Linux out. We've already seen with the Zaurus that /.ers need to be able to pay the M$ tax to actually purchase ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H get their parents to purchase anything.

    Nevermind that this represents a masterstroke in design: no ethernet, no keyboard, etc. to get it down to 3"x5" size + decent battery, but WITH bluetooth so you could add a real keyboard if you wish. My only desiderata is a USB to VGA adapter so I can send video to a projector. Other than that this is perfect for the 3 or so people who actually want to avoid paying the M$ tax. This is what the OQO could have been if its number one investor hadn't been a large monopoly trying to extend its outdated modus operandi into a mobile form factor without making mobile-oriented design choices.

  69. frogpad doesnt look easy to type fast. by serverleader · · Score: 1

    there is no way that I will be able to type fast on that thing... I will probably have to spend like $400 bucks on the device + training..

    --
    - - - - - . .. . - Get Counted!
  70. development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    besides maemo, what other development kits would i be able to use ? can i run anything that i could run on linux? keep in mind im far from knowledgable in linux, but i would also like to get out of development for windows mobile...

  71. Agh! by RichiP · · Score: 1

    But why OH WHY isn't it a cellphone as well?!?! Just when I thought my wait for my ideal devices was over. With these specs, I'd rather shell out for a Sharp SL-C3000 ... guess I need to wait a bit more.

    1. Re:Agh! by Hast · · Score: 1

      1) As has been pointed out (multiple times) use BT with your mobile phone.
      2) How would you talk into that in any case? It would make people using the Ngage look hip and cool in comparison.

    2. Re:Agh! by iamnotanumber6 · · Score: 1

      But why OH WHY isn't it a cellphone as well?!?!

      OH WHY would you want it to be? Why would you want to hold a great big thing like that up to your face? Why not shop around to find just the phone you like, and then use this for web stuff? They're quite different functions.

    3. Re:Agh! by jafomatic · · Score: 1
      1. Speakerphone option.
      2. Bluetooth handsfree from jabra (duh?)

      I'm still okay with it not being a phone, but I don't see why it couldn't also be that. I'd accept a slightly larger form (perhaps in width or height rather than depth) to include the antenna and whatever else the phone would need. Perhaps some larger battery capacity? Surely the keypad could be put on screen when dialing and hidden when, for example, the user is taking notes during the conversation.

      This is almost the "one true device" despite that it lacks storage, camera, and phone. I still like it. Here's why:

      • I don't need the camera that bad.
      • I don't need music storage that bad if we can stream digital music from the cellphone network as this says it will do.
      • It works with the phone that could stay in my pocket.
      Between bluetooth, wifi, and usb, the chance for huge improvements remains high. Other 3rd party devices could be made (like a bluetooth digital camera?) which would satisfy some of the other desires.

      ...I wonder if ttyquake would run on this :)

      --
      ::jafomatic
    4. Re:Agh! by RichiP · · Score: 1

      Because I'm looking for one device to act as my cellphone and organizer. I don't intend to put the unit to my face. I'll have a bluetooth headset to do that for me. At the same time, I could jot things down on my device or look up information.

      I'd rather have that one device and a bluetooth handset rather than a cellphone and a browsing unit.

    5. Re:Agh! by tao · · Score: 1

      Probably, but we've been running graphical quake on it, so why bother? =)

  72. So $799 vs $350 by serverleader · · Score: 1

    bigger screen($350) vs USB + 30Gig ($799) ... uhm...
    Dont get me wrong the Pocket Media Assistant PMA400 kicks ass but not at $800 bucks

    --
    - - - - - . .. . - Get Counted!
  73. Maybe not by wiredog · · Score: 1
    I suspect the card slot will soon have larger cards, and it does have a USB port. And who wants to watch a movie on a 5.5 * 3 inch screen?

    Would be a great picture viewer.

    1. Re:Maybe not by Combuchan · · Score: 1

      Ask the people that make Pocket DivX, my former boss, just about anybody who would care to watch a movie on a 3 x 2.5" 320x240 screen. They're out there.

      If you were stuck at the airport all night and all you had were a few movies on compact flash and a decent pair of headphones, you'd understand this more.

      Never underestimate the processing power bored people need with their PDA's.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    2. Re:Maybe not by PDA_Monkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, I regularly watch entire DVDs on my PDA.
      I transcode them with dvd::rip to ~400MB XviD4.
      They are stored on my 512MB SD card.
      I'll eventually upgrade to a 1GB or larger card and have multiple to choose from.

      --
      Hallo, My name is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to die!
  74. Amazing! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Finnish gadget manufacturer adopts Finnish OS. What took them so long?

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  75. it still sucks.... by O2dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what about audio IN? that way it would (shock horror) actually be useful, because we could (possibly) run skype on it.

    --
    - It took western civilisation 2000 years to ensure popular literacy, and now we work with icon driven GUI's. Go figure.
    1. Re:it still sucks.... by nchip · · Score: 1

      It has a mic, and with some programming you could connect to a bluetooth headset.

      --
      signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
  76. Passwords, security. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And if you're wanting to do stuff that requires great security such as online banking and/or purchases with credit cards, etc... then using a wireless device to do so, means you must be nuts or careless or both.

  77. Take a Maemo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    make install -not war

  78. But.... by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    ...Does it run Longhorn?

  79. Pregadous by doru · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a perfectly cromulent word !

  80. Can you say... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Games!
    I want one.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Can you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check it out at : www.indt.org.br/maemo
      Two simple games ported for device, 5 more to come! one multiplayer over wi-fi almost done =)

      But the device performance is not that great for games! The screen is too big.

      =)

  81. It's a... by Valiss · · Score: 1

    ... pregadous ...
    wtf?
    ...perfectly cromulent word.

    --

    -Valiss
  82. well, not bad... by rwven · · Score: 1

    this is really the next step towards the star trek "padd" device IMO. something we can use to access a lot, but not too much. extremely easy to use and something you will likely keep around the house or on the kitchen counter, by the bed, in the bathroom reading material, etc. I'm impressed and i can guarantee you i'll own one...

  83. A phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't look at the specs to closely but slap a cheesy little camera in this, license a hello-kitty skin and watch these buggers fly off the shelves.

  84. they are pushing heavily for software patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always disgusted by those companies lobbying intensely the members of the european Parlament and the members of the european Commission for establishing a US-like all-patentability scheme... and that put on the market commercial products based on Free Software...

    Nokia has to be boycotted !

    A european Free Software developer

  85. I don't by wiredog · · Score: 1

    I'm working on development on a Zaurus C3000.

  86. This is the same Nokia... by linuxhansl · · Score: 1
    that is lobbying hard to bring unlimited software patents to Europe.

    I realize Nokio is a big company with many more or less independent departments; but this strikes me as "riding the horse both ways".

  87. Not so good signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The patent license seems to be purely a PR stunt without any real substance whatsoever.

    First, they don't even assert that anything is covered by their patents.

    Second, they assert a right to start acting up if something that is covered by their patents ends up in the kernel.

    And third, most importantly, if some patented thing were covered by this license, its use is only authorized in the Linux kernel, which is incompatible with GPL's clause 7. It follows that if Nokia makes a credible patent claim on something that is in the kernel, then nobody has a license to distribute the kernel anymore until the patent issue is sorted out in the usual manner.

    To sum it up, they're just trying to shine their shield after bashing some FFII heads in here in the EU.

  88. Pepper Pad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How about the Pepper Pad? The Pepper Pad has a larger (8.4") screen, a 20GB disk, Wi-Fi, bluetooth, a keyboard, SD card, etc.

    It's Linux based too, and includes Java + Mozilla

  89. Re:Take a Maemo - Debian? by SlightlyOldGuy · · Score: 1

    The Debian repository is interesting. So this Linux is Debian based, perhaps?

  90. Re:Take a Maemo - Debian? by tao · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  91. reformat (was: Re:Take a Maemo) by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

    Should have used the Preview button :(.

    "Modified Hildon GTK+ is more suitable for embedded device, but it's still binary-compatible with normal GTK+."

    The major milestone here is Nokia developing the GUI for mobile devices that runs on Linux (it's a tweaked GNU GTK+, in fact). That means that the premiere organization bringing mobile computing to the masses is figuring out the presentation layer. Which Linux programmers can then use to deliver apps to those mobile masses. Hildon transcends just this phone, just Nokia, and even just "phones". When someone writes a GNOME->Hildon porting tool, Linux developers and the mobile mass market will really go together nicely. And since Maemo apps are Debian packages, SW can be distributed to this huge market with a familiar mechanism that includes automatic comarketing via dependencies. This is going to be fun.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:reformat (was: Re:Take a Maemo) by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
      100% Troll

      TrollMods are going nuts today - that mod isn't even valid, let alone "fair". Probably another Slashstalker, sleazily modding my posts "Troll" without even reading them. Metamodding really needs some teeth.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  92. Wrong wrong wrong by OlivierB · · Score: 1

    Excep that AAa run at 1.5V each which is unlikely to be the voltage of the battery in this baby (phone & PDA batteries are usually between 3.5 and 5V)

    So yes you get 4600mAh with two AA batteries but only at 1.5V (or more precisely 1.2V which is the electric potential for Ni-MH).
    Or you get 2300mAh at 1.2V*2 (2.4V).

    You should think in terms of power by having a simple U*I
    So if the battery in the tablet rated for 1500mAh @ 4V, then power = 6W
    Power for a couple of Ni-MH at 2300mAh each is 2*(2.3*1.2)=5.52W
    The battery they will use is also probably LIthium which makes it lighter and more resistent to charge fade. Did I mention it is also much smaller?

    AA are only good if you need power in standard format, ie you can go to the local Eckerds and get some juice for your Camera, Palm etc..
    They are not the best things for W/cm^3 or W/gram

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    1. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by Tupper · · Score: 1
      The battery they will use is also probably LIthium which makes it lighter and more resistent to charge fade. Did I mention it is also much smaller?

      Um, I couldn't disagree more. Rechargeable AAs also use Lithium. Plus you can charge them separately from the device, replace them with better batteries when the better batteries come along next year, and, in a emergency, use alkalines from any convenience store in the world.

      Standard size batteries win unless the device form factor is very strange, which is not the case here.

      BTW: energy is what's conserved here; Joules or milliwatt hours are the right metric.

    2. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by nxtw · · Score: 1

      the rechargable AA batteries I have here (2500mAh Duracell) are nickel metal hydrate (NiMH), IIRC

  93. Bluetooth keyboard and this... maybe... by javaxman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That would make it usable to me. Virtual Keyboards suck, pure and simple, and as much as I like to surf the web, I'm not laying down $350 for something to look at websites with a tiny screen.

    IF the CPU ( uh, I don't see that in the spec, that makes me worry, folks... ) is powerful enough, and you could pack on external batteries to keep it going for 3 hours *while* actually using your Bluetooth keyboard, it looks like it could *almost* work as a more-portable laptop replacement. Something to type up notes on while sitting in the park or coffee shop, that kind of thing.

    Not that I'm going to run out and get one. I still look at this and think "but... maybe I just want a laptop..". On the other hand, if you could use a BT keyboard with it, it might be sort of like a low-power, extremely small laptop with a keyboard you can ditch when you're not entering lots of data... that does have a certain appeal.

    1. Re:Bluetooth keyboard and this... maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an ARM 9 based omap 1710 with up to 220mhz and a DSP. It's a nice platform / processor but the 800x480 screen make the processor sweat =)

    2. Re:Bluetooth keyboard and this... maybe... by Big+Jojo · · Score: 1

      Quoting the anon coward since I've no mod points today:

      It's an ARM 9 based omap 1710 with up to 220mhz and a DSP. It's a nice platform / processor but the 800x480 screen make the processor sweat =)

      The integrated lcd controller is probably not being used; or maybe it is. 160 KB SRAM dedicated to it.

      If this catches on, the omap 2420 based version will be much fun to see. Those are based on ARM11 -- armv6, rather than armv5tej -- and have much more video horsepower.

      Linux 2.6.12 ... ;)

  94. Ogg vorbis support? by Kili · · Score: 1

    I notice it doesn't have ogg vorbis format support. I wonder how long before someone hacks in superior audio format for listening?

    Ahh the power of opensource...

    1. Re:Ogg vorbis support? by rillian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I talked to Uraeus about this a bit. The machine has combined ARM9/TI DSP cores. The idea is that you want the codecs running on the DSP, and apparently the free Xiph codecs we're included in the launch because there's no DSP port of the reference implementations. (There's no GCC back end for the dsp, although some folks are working on a related series.) This includes Ogg Theora, Speex and FLAC as well as Ogg Vorbis.

      Whether the ARM is too slow (or battery consumptive) to run the decoders on its own, I'm not clear but with everything open source it will be easy to check.

      I'll be a Guadec, where they are apparently also doing a demo, so hopefully will know more next week.

      In the long term though we need help with the DSP gcc port and someone to do hand-optimized asm for the xiph codecs. If anyone's interested, please let us know.

    2. Re:Ogg vorbis support? by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      The Neuros Firmware has had its source released and contains a copy of Tremor ported to run on the c54x, if the the Nokia 770 uses the ARM9/c54x combined core I'm sure it could be ported to the 770. The hard part (getting it to run at an acceptable speed on the c54x) has already been done at least.

      Sean Starkey is also in the middle of getting libflac to compile with the TI Compiler right now. In theory it should be able to decode without needing any serious optimisations.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    3. Re:Ogg vorbis support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ARM is fast enough to run the decoders, but there's little point in doing it there when the DSP is far better off doing the job. It's in the package anyways, so you may as well make use of it. OMAP 1710 has a c55x DSP, which as far as I know is not completely incompatible with c54x, so it may be possible to clue in binutils and gcc about c55x by building on top of the c54x work.

      There are already DSP linux tools however, including the ability to build static and dynamic DSP binaries and remap them in to the DSP address space by way of the DSP gateway. There is no process scheduler in the native DSP kernel yet, so much of the codec fiddling will have to be controlled by hand. This already works in practice, and does not depend on gcc or binutils in any way.

  95. Cause then i could convince my boss to get me one by SkjeggApe · · Score: 1

    to replace my current cellphone :-)

  96. Deja Vu by Nih,+the+Koaster · · Score: 1
    I seem to remember Nokias previous outing into open source internet tablets, with the 'proof-of-concept' MediaScreen:

    That time around it was the mozilla, and it had digital TV integrated.

    There's also the more recent Media Terminal, which is probably best left forgotten:

    ~
  97. CF cards for DSLR photographers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every professional photographer would buy one of these for image preview if it used CF cards ... what a pity.

    Maybe we can download images to it by Bluetooth instead.

    Heck, it's Linux, we can make it do anything we want! :-)

  98. There is also a video Re:Screenshots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a low res video here http://aksi.mdamt.net/log/ar/2005-05-25-107/ by one of its developers? looks too big for me

  99. Not so good signs by mjrauhal · · Score: 1

    The patent license seems to be purely a PR stunt without any real substance whatsoever.

    First, they don't even assert that anything is covered by their patents.

    Second, they assert a right to start acting up if something that is covered by their patents ends up in the kernel.

    And third, most importantly, if some patented thing were covered by this license, its use is only authorized in the Linux kernel, which is incompatible with GPL's clause 7. It follows that if Nokia makes a credible patent claim on something that is in the kernel, then nobody has a license to distribute the kernel anymore until the patent issue is sorted out in the usual manner.

    To sum it up, they're just trying to shine their shield after bashing some FFII heads in here in the EU.

    (Sorry for the dup, managed to log in now, and hey, that's slashdot for you.)

  100. Idiot, it's Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want more storage? Access your fileserver over wifi. How many terabytes do you need?

    This is a Linux device man. You can make it do anything you want, no limits.

  101. Few things would make this device Great by skgala · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Small keyboard that can be attached/removed when needed. 2. Hard Disk 3. Ethernet port

  102. Re:The nokia Internet tablet-wake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The battery drains in 3 hrs while browsing....not cool

    Major General Leftie.

  103. I've seen it. It sucks. by richi · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm here at LinuxWorld in New York, and I've played with one. Some thoughts at www.richi.co.uk.

    Summary: It sucks. I wanted to like it, but ... I didn't.

    1. Re:I've seen it. It sucks. by richi · · Score: 1

      I'm replying to my own post, 'cos I picked up a few anonymous flame comments and hate-mail. At the risk of feeding trolls, I offer this response.

  104. Re:Pregadous by DFarmerTX · · Score: 1

    I think he meant pregadoux, a Cajun word meaning pregnant. -- This is not a script

  105. AAAHHHHHHH! MY EYES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those damn Linux fonts!

  106. Re:A phone *and* a GPS by geirt · · Score: 1

    I think a phone (using a bluetooth headset) and a GPS whould be a nice addition to this (almost) perfect PDA. I want one.

    --

    RFC1925
  107. Kernel sources by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

    I poked around the repository, but I didn't find any kernel sources or patches. Does anyone know where to get the kernel images?

    1. Re:Kernel sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost everything is in the main kernel.org tree already, other things are in the Linux OMAP tree. It is a generic OMAP target.

      If you look at the contributions page on the maemo site this has already been explained.

    2. Re:Kernel sources by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

      According to the Linux Arm machines page, the config type is CONFIG_MACH_NOKIA770 but I wasn't able to find this in the Linux OMAP patches.

      Any ideas about where a .config file is that I can use?

    3. Re:Kernel sources by tao · · Score: 1

      If you read the Linux-OMAP mailing list, you'll find this:

      The kernel stuff (except the WLAN module, to which we have NDA limitations) will be published and merged to the public OMAP tree as soon as I find the time.
    4. Re:Kernel sources by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

      Awesome, thanks!

      Alex

  108. Another attempt by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    Another attempt at making a great handheld device... and another miss. But this was a good try. Really is. Wouldn't buy it for 200. Would ebay it if it was given. I use such devices as a laptop replacement... but this one somehow seems more limited regardless of the nicer display.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  109. Right right right (parent) by wsanders · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as a rechargeable AA lithium cell. "Lithium" AA's use Lithium-Iron or a similar technology and are about 1.45 V per cell. "Lithium-Ion" cells are mostly what we use in our phones and other gizmos (some cheapo cells are NiMh) and those cells are about 3.6V per cell.

    There is a somewhat standard Li-Ion form factor for those designers willing to use cylindrical cells: for example the 18650 is fairly ubiquitous, about 2000 MaH. My HP Jornada uses 2 of them in series and will run about 6 hours with WiFi disabled.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  110. Multi-User? by bats · · Score: 1

    This would be a great gizmo to sit in the kitchen for checking stuff on the web far away from the office and the real computers.

    But does it do multi-user? I'd really like a web tablet that did basic email and web with multiple accounts via some kind of fast user switching interface. Oh well, this probably isn't it.

  111. First Reaction... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    The form factor is nice, but they sure could have used a better scrolling mechaism. A touch-pad strip along the side of the front face could be much more flexible... and allow for right or left hand operation easily.

    The device looks like something a lot of people could use. I wish Nokia luck with it... (and secretly hope that Apple comes out with a better version before Nokia gets to market...)

  112. Zaurus Port by WJMoore · · Score: 1

    So this is based on X11 and Gtk which makes it somewhat more appealing than the Qt Embedded that the Zaurus uses. However the Zaurus has a keyboard, better connectivity and storage options. So I'm thinking that since maemo is open source a Zaurus port wouldn't be out of the question and quite useful.

  113. ... but thanks for donating patents to Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're listening?

  114. Re:Ogg vorbis support? What about Nokia 6600? by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    Mine decodes Oggs just fine, through Oggplay (symbianoggplay.sourceforge.net/). It's done using the DSP AFAIK. Can't see why this beauty wouldn't. The 6600 sports an ARM9 CPU too, running at 104Mhz.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  115. Gnome based? Minimo??? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    Is the UI gnome based then? And the browser? Anyone know which browser they use? Could it be Minimo?

    1. Re:Gnome based? Minimo??? by wheany · · Score: 1

      They use Opera.

    2. Re:Gnome based? Minimo??? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      pity, no adblock :/

  116. Actually, this is a thin PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks exciting; can't wait for them to make a PDA out of it.

    Initially I thought that this device was a fantastic thin workslate, extremely well connected for home use by Wifi and Bluetooth, and almost as well connected for mobile use if you can carry a belt-holstered Bluetooth mobile with you.

    Then I discovered that it's only 141x79 mm in size, effectively PDA-sized and not nearly big enough for a workslate (same width as my old Palm 3). In fact, it's not really big enough even for comfortable reading of e-novels.

    800x480 resolution packed into a display that tiny is just plain silly, we'll need a magnifying glass. The display area should have been novel-sized, with a border only slightly larger, which would have put it into a niche of its own. As it stands, it's up against every single well-connected PDA on the planet.

  117. If you want an iPod, buy an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The killer for me is no harddrive. If it only had a 40 GB microdrive, (and if the price was reasonable) I would get one instead of an MP3 player.

    This isn't a storage box with audio output --- there already are dozens of those in existence. Instead it's a superbly well connected graphic tablet or workslate, along the lines of the "thin client" concept.

    Its content is meant to be online, not held internally.

  118. interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Nokia basically owns Symbian, why didn't they try to extend it to PDA area? Or do they have plans to integrate Symbian platform with linux (=port it)?
    Such strong unified platform would be a great gain to open source movement.