Slashdot Mirror


Impact of Daylight Savings Time Changes?

jason718 writes "With the pending changes to U.S. Daylight Savings Time, what impact will those changes have to existing systems and their applications? Are some operating systems more open than others with regard to the configuration of Daylight Savings Time start and end dates, or will we need yet another update or patch to modify the internal calendar?"

572 comments

  1. Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by fembots · · Score: 5, Informative

    With over 800 comments, I thought that's enough to get an idea of its impact and suggestions to deal with it.

    1. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by ZephyrXero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Are some operating systems more open than others with regard to the configuration of Daylight Savings Time start and end dates, or will we need yet another update or patch to modify the internal calendar?"

      I'm pretty sure all operating systems will need to be updated to work with this new system...lol. BIOSes too.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that relate to the post you are replying to?

    3. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      I doubt it.
      A) OSes... My OS uses a nice list of time zones and DST dates and such. I just edit the file and modify the dates and bam, done.
      B) BIOS... no way. if your BIOS does DST changes then it is broken.

    4. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems to me that I had an old 486 AMIBIOS that would do DST, and that I had to turn it off to make it behave sanely with Linux. I'm assuming that any such system could be set to UDT, and then let the operating system handle timechanges. Maybe there's some hardware out there that have some problems. That's the difficulty with older systems.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by TheGreek · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that I had an old 486 AMIBIOS that would do DST, and that I had to turn it off to make it behave sanely with Linux.

      I think that's what he meant by "broken."

    6. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by dextroz · · Score: 1
      Dude whats up withy your sig? I googled it but it came up with nothing relevant.

      *Correction: "...that's the difficulty with *some* older *well*chosen*adjectives* peoples"

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    7. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it during the Carter administration. Didn't save any energy, killed more pedestrians. Made the politicians look like fools.

    8. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't, he/she did this because someone posted a similar reply about 30 minutes earlier.

    9. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How does that relate to the post you are replying to?

      I doesn't. ZX just wanted his post to appear as near the top as possible. The best way to do this, short of getting FP, is to be the first to reply to FP. ZX hopes the people won't realize this, and that someone may even mod him up. He hopes that he can earn enough kharma that he may be able to afford to move out of his Mom's basement.

      To Slashdot editors/coders:

      Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

      It's been 15 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form.


      No, I'm not behind a fucking firewall or proxy, and I didn't click my fucking "Back" button. What happened was that you fucking idiots don't fucking tell me in advance (when I fucking click the fucking "Reply to This" link) how fucking long I have to fucking wait to fucking post. Instead, you wait until I have composed my reply and try to submit it, and only then do you tell me that I should have waited longer. This is totally fucked up. If I didn't have ad blocking turned on, I would email your advertisers and complain about how you treat people who post anonymously when they post useless crap because they are afraid to compromise their kharma.

      Oh, and when the fuck are you going to fix the punctuation in your obnoxious message ("It's been X minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" should end with a period/full stop, you stupid motherfucking cunts)?

    10. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the question again?

    11. Re:Daylight Saving = Duping 11pm by stanmann · · Score: 1

      If you would register and not troll, you would only need to wait 2 minutes between comments.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  2. FIIIIIIIIIIRSTIE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are some operating systems more open than others with regard to the configuration of Daylight Savings Time start and end dates, or will we need yet another update or patch to modify the internal calendar?""

    No, probably not.

  3. Who cares? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are some operating systems more open than others with regard to the configuration of Daylight Savings Time start and end dates, or will we need yet another update or patch to modify the internal calendar?

    Wouldn't a patch for this sort of thing require all of 10 seconds to make?

    1. Re:Who cares? by sgant · · Score: 5, Funny

      But banks and financial institutions have all had their software built for daylight savings time ending sooner! Now everything will be out of whack as the banks and computers and the electronic grid system will think it's an hour later than it is!

      Planes will fall out of the sky! The banks will collapse! LIFE AS WE KNOW IT WILL CEASE! We need to panic people! PANIC! Start hiring floors and floors of programmers to change all the code out there.

      Ok, maybe not...

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:Who cares? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Wouldn't a patch for this sort of thing require all of 10 seconds to make?"

      Aren't there a hell of a lot of machines to patch?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Who cares? by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wouldn't a patch for this sort of thing require all of 10 seconds to make?

      And about 10 years to get fully deployed. There are machines still running unpatched copies of Windows 98 and IE 5.0 out there.

      I hope they give us several years' notice, so that we can all go out and buy New-DST-compliant VCRs along with our HDTV-compliant TVs.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Who cares? by standards · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have about 54 Unix servers to care and feed.

      I estimate that we will perform zero patches to handle these specific rule changes.

      The switch already happens - it'll just happen on different days. And if you recall, these changes have happened before - so it isn't really unexpected for those who have been in the business a while.

      The Y2K contracting folks will have you jumping off your seats, but for everyone who runs these systems: no big deal.

      I'm sure some home users will be caught off guard, but then again most desktop users have their clock set to the wrong timezone.

    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!
      Unless you're running something that needs to be accurate down to the minute, it's cheaper tojust to go around and manually (or automagically) change the time on every machine, rather then having to patch every operating systems and/or software. Especially in an mixed environment, where, and, especially with Windows, which will probably require a reboot.

    6. Re:Who cares? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Look, down the hall, it's. . . Clock Setter Man!

      We're saved!

      KFG

    7. Re:Who cares? by jafac · · Score: 1

      bah, all my computers get their time from a time server, no worries here.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Who cares? by huckleup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe time servers report some sort of untranslated time, like Universal or Greenwich Mean. Your local machine then adjusts the displayed time locally, so I think it will still be an issue for you.

    9. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious. Will Windows XP support the change? Or, will Microsoft force us to upgrade to Vista?

    10. Re:Who cares? by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 0

      You will probably be able to download the patch if you agree to be probed by Windows Genuine Advantage (TM). I can see it now: "With Windows Genuine Advantage, your computer will now be able to make Daylight Savings Time adjustments on the correct day! Just install this ActiveX program with your browser and click here to send all the information we want!"

      Actually though, I think that Windows XP machines by default synchronize with time.windows.com. However, I think that without a patch, Windows will try to adjust DST on the wrong day.

    11. Re:Who cares? by SeventyBang · · Score: 3, Insightful



      Look! Down the hall! It's Pedantic Man!


      He knows it's Daylight Saving Time

      (not Daylight SavingS Time)

      I have yet to figure out why anyone outside of the states of Indiana, Arizona, and Hawaii actually give a rat's posterior about DST (because it's a part of life and takes place seemingly without effort). Those are the only three states which do not observe DST. Indiana has several clusters of counties near Chicago, Cincinnati, Louisville which do so on their own. Indiana's legislature also enacted a law to observe it, but now it requires Federal action to finish it, including which time zone(s) are observed. So there's a "fact finding" tour underway where people can sound off regarding which time zone they want to "belong to".

      One state legislator voted against it because it would mess up his constituents' schedules when they had to take their kids over the state line (to Illinois) and the time difference would force them to restructure their days. No one took the time to point out to this moron that part of Indiana was on "New York time" (an hour ahead of that area of Illinois) six months a year and on "Chicago time" (the same time as that area) six months a year. So being at the same time or a difference of one hour constantly is less confusing than switching every six months?

      That's no worse than years ago when those in the rural areas I grew up in complained it would mess up the cows' milking schedules. No one pointed out to them cows' don't look at the clocks. What they meant to say is it would mess up their schedules but using the cows as an excuse seemed to make it sound like it was somehow more critical? You wouldn't have believed it this year. Parents whined it would screw up kids going to bed: "How can you tell kids it's time to go to bed at 8:30pm when it's still light out?" Drive-In theatre owners whined it would cause shows to start later (although the number of drive-ins around the country, including Indiana, is a pittance of what it used to be), restaurants bellyached it would screw up supper hours because people would go out to eat based upon how light it was, not the time on the clock. You'd think no one else in the world had ever dealt with DST before.

      I think the only people who would have whined more are those who would have had a million dollars bestowed upon them - but in pennies and they'd have to count and lug them to the bank.

      (To be honest, it was always good sport to watch the political turmoil. I find it no different than the current Supreme Court nomination. In spite of the long-term importance, and regardless of one's personal political perspective, I find watching political friction to be one of America's great indoor sports. The higher the level, the more interesting it becomes. All of the others (sports) have been ruined by tweaking the rules.

      On a more humorous note, I actually had something cooked up to take advantage of the annual turmoil in Indiana's legislature. I planned to circulate a story to the effect:

      Microsoft was behind the lobbying effort to stop the observance of DST because of all of the Windows machines which list Indiana as its own timezone. Microsoft was afraid they would find themselves responsible for creating and supporting patches for all of those PCs, even for OSes which are no longer under active support.

      My intent had been to start on March 29-30 so there would be a couple of days to circulate and work toward passing it along to a couple of friends in the local media - hopefully, using some forged email as additional proof. I thought of it as an interesting birthday experiment (my birthday is April Fool's Day). Alas, the missus never permitted it. She was afraid there would be some legal repercussions, despite the opportunity for humor.

      oh well.


    12. Re:Who cares? by grozzie2 · · Score: 1

      To late, thats already been done. Remember the big hoo-haa about y2k. Gotta wonder if the public is dumb enough to fall for that again...

    13. Re:Who cares? by adrianmonk · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have about 54 Unix servers to care and feed. I estimate that we will perform zero patches to handle these specific rule changes.

      I know, you only have to change the file that defines the timezone, and there is no need to change executable code or anything. So, it seemingly isn't that big a deal.

      But, let me ask you a question: although you plan to patch zero machines, how many machines will you reboot?

      The problem, for me, is this: I have been using Unix for over 15 years now, and for about 5 years I was a Unix administrator. I consider myself pretty knowledge about Unix. However, I have NO IDEA whether the important commands (cron and so on) re-read the timezone description periodically or whether a reboot is required. I've simply never run into that issue. So, I don't know whether a reboot is required, so if I ran 54 Unix servers, I suppose I would have to reboot them all just to be on the safe side.

      Now, it's not a HUGE productivity loss to have to reboot a bunch of servers, but it is a definite waste of time. All in all, this modified daylight saving time idea just seems really dumb to me.

    14. Re:Who cares? by KiloByte · · Score: 1
      Why would they care about timezones? All they know about is time(). Things like cron just know how to deal with time() suddenly going back or forth an hour. From man cron:

      Special considerations exist when the clock is changed by less than 3 hours, for example at the beginning and end of daylight savings time. If the time has moved forwards, those jobs which would have run in the time that was skipped will be run soon after the change. Conversely, if the time has moved backwards by less than 3 hours, those jobs that fall into the repeated time will not be re-run.
      Clock changes of more than 3 hours are considered to be corrections to the clock, and the new time is used immediately.

      Rebooting servers for any reason other than a kernel upgrade and/or {failover,backup} testing is pure Windowsizm and unnecessary downtime.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    15. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cringe each time I hear someone say something like that - the reason y2k WASN'T a disaster was because we spent a fucking fortune making sure it wasn't. Boy, I would have LOVED to keep certain us states as "controls", and not fix any y2k problems in their systems... send the religious nutters back to the stone age where they belong. Hypocritical bastards didn't and don't deserve working computers.

    16. Re:Who cares? by pAnkRat · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need to reboot.

      If you are not sure about cron rereading the timezone:
      - read the man page
      - ask someone who knows (mailinglist?)

      If in doubt, just do a "/etc/init.d/crond restart"
      that should do the trick.

      --
      we need an "-1 Plain wrong" moderation option!
    17. Re:Who cares? by VdG · · Score: 1

      Whilst I agree in principal about not needing to reboot, sometimes it's just simpler.

      (N.B. I'm talking here about a change to the timezone definition, not simply the move from normal to DST.)

      Stopping and re-starting cron will take care of scheduling done by cron, but what about all of the other processes that are running? Like cron, they picked up the appropriate timezone environment when they first started and will continue to use it, even if you've since changed that environment. ($TZ in my case.) Some of these may be doing their own scheduling - e.g. a specialist scheduling package, or a major application such as SAP - for others it may be a matter of log messages being produced with the "wrong" time. (That's quite a pain if you're trying to tie up events on different servers.)

      Re-starting the affected process will take care of it but there could be loads - not to mention any system processes which are logging with the wrong time.

      Having gone to the trouble of arranging an outage to, say, an SAP system you might just as well take the extra 15 minutes and reboot.

    18. Re:Who cares? by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Why would they care about timezones? All they know about is time(). Things like cron just know how to deal with time() suddenly going back or forth an hour.

      That's true. However, the implementation of time() resides in libc, which is a shared library, which is loaded when the executable itself is loaded. So now we are faced with another question: does the implementation of time() that resides in libc know how to deal with a situation where the file that defines the timezone (/usr/share/lib/zoneinfo/US/Central in my case) changes after libc is loaded? Will that implementation in the library re-read the file as necessary, or does it just read it once when it first needs it (or when it loads)?

      If it doesn't re-read the file when it changes (and there would be little reason to design it so that it does, since timezone files don't change often), then every executable that uses time() will have to be restarted so that it can re-read that file. It's possible that time() will respond properly, but how will you know the answer to that?

      And that brings up another question: can you make a list of all programs that use time() and will therefore need to be restarted? If you do make a list, are you sure you got everything?

      IMHO, the safe thing to do is just reboot. There may be a way to do this without rebooting, but it's a one-time thing, so you don't have the opportunity to gain the experience to know whether it's necessary or not.

    19. Re:Who cares? by standards · · Score: 1

      Like others have said, I will reboot zero machines.

      Of course, this may be a problem for some other operating systems or some weirdo (flawed) programs that try to figure out local time on their own. I can't speak for them. But I know my Unix and Linux based hosts and applications won't be a problem.

      So if you're running BeOS or Windows or CMS, well, I dunno.

      Every country has different timezone rules, and they are always changing. This is not a big deal - in fact, it happens all the time. For those with International operations with localtime representation, this is par for the course.

    20. Re:Who cares? by huckleup · · Score: 1

      But I know my Unix and Linux based hosts and applications won't be a problem.

      Famous last words from someone who seems to have a serious backup of testosterone. Unless you've written all the code for all the tools your clients rely on, I can't see how you can possibly know for sure what is going to happen.

      The *good* admins I know never say never. They say "let's do this just in case. It's not worth taking any chances in the middle of a project".

      I.e. "Sh*t happens".

    21. Re:Who cares? by standards · · Score: 1

      Famous last words from someone who seems to have a serious backup of testosterone. Unless you've written all the code for all the tools your clients rely on, I can't see how you can possibly know for sure what is going to happen.

      Eh? I didn't say I was stupid. I always ask my primary vendors about potential impact. As I stated earlier, we suffer through a timezone rule changes quite frequently, being an international company with servers located all over the world (networking isn't what we'd all like it to be).

      Of course, unexpected things happen every day. So we always have contingency and recovery plans.

      Can shit happen? Yes. Do I worry about things? Yes. Do I make sure we do whatever we can within budget and manpower constraints to have 100% availability? Yes. I've had 100% availability for more than 3 years in all of our locations. Don't tell me about what "*good* admins" say and do.

  4. Impact of DST changes by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 3, Funny

    The sleep patterns of Slashdotters will be messed up... Oh, wait a minute...

    1. Re:Impact of DST changes by Virak · · Score: 1

      What is this 'sleep' you speak of?

    2. Re:Impact of DST changes by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure, but I"ve heard that babies partake in it some 18 hours a day.

    3. Re:Impact of DST changes by UncleFluffy · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like:

      What is this "Daylight" you speak of?

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    4. Re:Impact of DST changes by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      SLEEP(1) User Commands SLEEP(1)

      NAME
      sleep - delay for a specified amount of time

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  5. I expect it to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  6. I, for one... by nxtw · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...would refuse to honor any daylight savings time changes. It's definitely more trouble than it'd be worth.

    1. Re:I, for one... by hunterx11 · · Score: 0

      Kramer already tried extending daylight savings time. The real question is, will your plan work better or worse than his?

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    2. Re:I, for one... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 0

      personally, id rather just not fuck with time at all, get rid of DST altogether... or better yet, live on GMT so when you tell someone in another state/country what time to meet you dont have to compute time zones.

    3. Re:I, for one... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      or better yet, live on GMT so when you tell someone in another state/country what time to meet you dont have to compute time zones.

      I can see it now... "Why would you call me at 3pm? Its in the middle of the night!" Talk about causing confusion. I can + or - from GMT, and if the whole world used GMT, you would still have to calculate what hours they were open, when is it too early or too late to call, etc. That would be a worse nightmare.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:I, for one... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Only if you wear a bro with your puffy shirt.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you wear a bro...

      Too ethnic.

    6. Re:I, for one... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 0

      My original thought on that was: "Well, I'm awake from 13:00 to 05:00" or "We're open from 01:00 to 10:00".. So you just keep a table of times rather than keeping a table of times and offsets or calculating offsets at all..

      Then if youre meeting online, you say, "What about 08:35" and they say "I wont be up until 11:00" or "Sure, yeah I can do that"

      To me, it seems simpler once you get past the initial getting used to of being up at different hours.

    7. Re:I, for one... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Yeah...

      I still run at GMT-4/5 (4 during DST), but I'm about to lock everything I use at GMT, no DST adjustments.

      Unfortunately, my cell locks to the current time zone, using whatever DST behavior is in effect. So, I guess I'd do one time sync every so often, then change the hour to match GMT...

    8. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeesh, the mod "gods" are feeling cranky today.

    9. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      GMT ceased to exist in 1971. It is now known as UTC.

      RFC 3339 and ANSI X3.30 refer.

  7. No daylight savings time here by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    I live in Arizona, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arizona Doesn't count.

    2. Re:No daylight savings time here by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you finally started celebrating MLK day, I think.

    3. Re:No daylight savings time here by Whafro · · Score: 1

      don't flaunt your energy-wasting ways, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:No daylight savings time here by TWX · · Score: 1

      The Salt River supplies almost all of Phoenix's water, actually. We just know that as all of you miscreants move here from elsewhere that we'll need more water yet.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:No daylight savings time here by setzman · · Score: 0, Troll

      What the fuck is MLK day? We celebrate Jefferson Davis' birthday here in Alerbama.

      --
      C:\>
    6. Re:No daylight savings time here by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Arizona's position on Daylight Saving Time is enlightened, and we should all follow their shining example.

      If you want to go to work an hour earlier, just go to work an hour earlier. All this goddamn "pretend it's an hour later than it really is" bullshit is completely whacked. People who think DST is a good idea are like people who think setting their alarm clocks ten minutes later will improve the likelihood that they will get to work on time.

      Noon should always be when the sun is directly over my time-zone. If you want to adjust the business day according to available sunlight, it makes more sense to: 1. Change the start time instead of the clocks. 2. Do it gradually, the way available light changes gradually. That way you don't fuck up people's sleep cycles either.

      I wonder if the health problems (and sick days off work) due to disrupted sleep patterns has actually cost our society more than the energy saved by the whole DST concept. Seems like something which should have been studied by now...

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      Actually Nevada and California get priority on Colorado river water before Arizona does.

      I don't know about Colorado but Minnesota, the land of 10,000 lakes and water everywhere has all kinds of water use restrictions.

      As far as your snotty comment, Arizona has almost a million more people than Colorado and Phoenix is the 5th largest city in the US. Maybe your local government needs to do a better job at water management.

    8. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant MILK day. You know the day we honor our dairy cows.

    9. Re:No daylight savings time here by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could be worse - you could live in Indiana, a small state which effectively has THREE time zones (Central with DST near Chicago, and Eastern time with or without DST depending on where you are in the state.

    10. Re:No daylight savings time here by xs650 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Arizona's position on Daylight Saving Time is enlightened, and we should all follow their shining example.

      Enlightened isn't the word. Arizona avoids going on Daylight savings time to thumb it's nose at the Federal Government.

      At the same time, the Navajo Nation in Arizona thumbs it's nose at the Arizona State Government by going on daylight savings time

    11. Re:No daylight savings time here by TopShelf · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thank goodness Indiana is going to implement DST statewide next year, though - I work for a Swedish company in Indianapolis, and you wouldn't believe how many teleconferences get screwed up because the rest of the world changed their clocks and Indiana didn't...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    12. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced that it will save energy when Phoenix air conditioning costs are factored in. In the summer my electric bill hovers around $300 because of air conditioning. I think they would save more energy by promoting compact fluorescent bulbs. Also I'm glad when the sun goes down at 8:30 and it starts to cool down to the 90 degree low.

    13. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 2, Funny

      I haven't met a single person in AZ that wants DST

    14. Re:No daylight savings time here by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the vast majority of water in Phoenix is from wells. Yes, wells, not surface water. Several of the wells have even been shut down, mainly due TCE pollution, and about 10-15 years ago, full recycling was finally implemented (but not for golf courses, they get virgin water, go figure..)

      Might want to check your facts next time. Even the irrigation system for watering lawns is from well water. I actually had to get up at 2am to start and 3am to shutdown the irrigation channel on my days when I lived there. Oh, I dealt in water purification systems when I lived there.\, hense the knowlege.

      Also, in summer, most construction and outside jobs start at about 5-6am so they can go home before it gets over 100 anyway. We didn't need DST, we just started earlier in the day...

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    15. Re:No daylight savings time here by msimm · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Hawaii also skipped day light savings time and I really enjoyed that.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    16. Re:No daylight savings time here by xs650 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about married people?

    17. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      The Federal holiday started in 1986, Arizona voters approved the holiday in 1992 and was first observed in 1993. As far as I can tell is hold up was over the elimination of Columbus Day as a paid holiday.

    18. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because when its 110+, then sun can go down soon enough.

    19. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 2, Funny

      what about them?

    20. Re:No daylight savings time here by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      just curious, why don't you all invest in geothermal cooling solutions?

      let's assume it's 20k to install the geothermal cooling system. also assume it cuts your 300$ bill into half. so, you're saving 150$ per month for 9 months/yr. that's 1350$/year savings. assuming no inflation in energy costs, that system will be fully paid for in savings after ~14 years. after that, it's all money in the bank.

      i was told on my lot that it's too rocky down below and that there wouldn't be much heat transfer with a rocky base.

      besides that, your air conditioner will keep the inside a constant 69-72 no matter what hour it is (except if you have a time controlled thermostat , but are those really much more efficient during the peak usage)

    21. Re:No daylight savings time here by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

      Or MILF day.

    22. Re:No daylight savings time here by Teun · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Yeah right, are you ignorant?
      By leaving this to the individual nothing is gained, only a concerted and regulated system can have any effect.

      Wether the effect (energy savings) is worth the trouble can be calculated.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    23. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 2, Funny

      never mind, I get it now

    24. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      The water quality report I get with my bill sometimes said that 98% of Phoenix City water comes surface water that mostly started as snow pack. Some areas have small water companies that use well water.

      http://phoenix.gov/WATER/qualrept.html

    25. Re:No daylight savings time here by giorgiofr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yup, and the next logical step would be to *frigging use the same time all over the world*, sheesh! it's just a convention after all! all i need to do is remember that starting next year, the new day begins at XX.XX and i go to work at YY:YY instead of what i'm used to. quite easy. huge advantages. no cons. deal. sign me up. oh, wait, i'm alone here? uhm...

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    26. Re:No daylight savings time here by Blymie · · Score: 1

      I don't think there are any health problems with DST changes.. or at least, not for some people.

      I tend to start waking up early/late about a week before DST changes. My body and mind are ready for it, as they have been used to DST changes since birth (heck, even in the womb).

      Starting from birth, the entire household that I grew up in, would adjust accordingly every year!

      If anything, getting rid of DST for me, would be just as disturbing to sleep as extending it.

    27. Re:No daylight savings time here by tricorn · · Score: 1

      I don't know about now, but when I lived there as a child in around 1962, I know that our lawn irrigation came from the reservoir. We'd occasionally get fish or crawdads swimming around our lawn, which I always got really excited about.

    28. Re:No daylight savings time here by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Good link and everything. Obviously, the sources have changed (late 80s when I lived there). There were many more than 30 wells back then as well. The 98 report showed 95% surface, compared with 98 in 2004, and a 2002 doc shows "over 90% from rivers" so I am guessing they are calling recycled water "surface water" for the stats now.

      I stand corrected.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    29. Re:No daylight savings time here by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      that system will be fully paid for in savings after ~14 years. after that, it's all money in the bank.

      You forgot to include maintenance costs and the wear-and-tear on the unit. What's the average lifetime of a geothermal cooling system? If it's less than 14 years....

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    30. Re:No daylight savings time here by redsilo · · Score: 1

      I would add that abolishing DST would give opportunity to enlightened businesses to stagger their work schedules. The result could be that rush hour traffic would be evened out over several hours and congestion reduced. I grew up on a farm during the time DST was implemented in the '60s. We altered our summer schedule by getting up on 'sun time', ie. starting an hour later, breaking for lunch an hour later and then running til dark. Some of what we did was somewhat daylight sensitive so it made sense to do it that way. Hard for me to imagine the industrial/information/finan cial sector being able to adjust in a similar manner.

    31. Re:No daylight savings time here by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Yes there are studies that the waking up earlier in the day causes many car accidents the entire week of the change.

      This information was diclosed previously on slashdot, if you care to find the exact numbers, which are pretty frightening.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    32. Re:No daylight savings time here by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      Have you met a single person in AZ?

    33. Re:No daylight savings time here by pthisis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you want to go to work an hour earlier, just go to work an hour earlier.

      That would be nice if the other government rules and laws didn't mention time at all. But they do. In DC, they constrain when I can buy beer, play my radio audibly, ride the subway, etc. Changing DST has a real effect on those things.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    34. Re:No daylight savings time here by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Having lived in Indiana for 10 years, I remember some very entertaining public policy debates whenever the subject of daylight savings time was brought up (every spring). Some people were concerned that daylight savings time would screw up the cows milking schedule. Others seemed to think it would make the corn grow faster. I heard someone make the argument that it would reduce crime since there would be an extra hour of daylight. Some of these morons actually seemed to think that there would be another hour of sunlight, as if the earth's rotation were being slowed or something.

      Indiana's reluctance to switch with the rest of the world is mainly due to the extreme lack of progress, morelike fear of progress, that grips the people of this fine state.

    35. Re:No daylight savings time here by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Along with Daylight Saving Time get rid of those stupid laws about when you can buy beer, play the radio, or ride the subway. Problem solved.

    36. Re:No daylight savings time here by techduh · · Score: 1

      What about my milk cow? To say nothing of the demands of the damn ROOSTER!

      --
      milestogobeforeisleepsleepsleep
    37. Re:No daylight savings time here by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we all know that individual freedom is something that is frightenly dangerous. Just imagine if people everywhere to make their own decisions instaed of doing what the federal government tells them to!

      (I keep my PC's on UTC thank you very much....)

    38. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Forget thumbing our nose at the federal government. We have more daylight than we want here in arizona. Nothing like driving home from work at 11pm and having it still be 102F out. We don't stand to gain much, if anything from changing.

      As for the reservations, they pretty much do whatever they want within reason, and if they want to screw around with daylight savings time we're not going to stop them.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    39. Re:No daylight savings time here by gnugie · · Score: 1

      Of course, the blame for the screwed up teleconference is on DST, not the freaking morons who can't read a clock.

      It's not that damned hard. After 10 years of this, I've never had anyone miss any of my meetings due to daylight time confusion. Then again, I actually understand time zones.

      I'm sad to see Indiana jump on this assinine bandwagon of "pretending" to give more sunlight in a day.

      Are you also aware that many countries observe switch to/from daylight time on different dates? How on earth do you handle that mess?

      --
      Don't know; Don't care; Don't ask
    40. Re:No daylight savings time here by thogard · · Score: 1

      There is also a specific class of accidents involving kids going to school that increases dramatically because the DST time change is about 2 weeks off from the best time to do it.

      Won't someone please think of the children?

    41. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many places in the north, especially Canada, that can vary wildly throughout the year. Without daylight savings time you'd have times where sunrise is at 3am, or sunset is at 2pm. A single hour change on our clocks does a lot more for keeping people sane and undistrupted than just ignoring it.

      Think of it as the further north you travel, the more and more of an insensitive clod you become.

    42. Re:No daylight savings time here by clifyt · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I never wanted DST here in Indiana either until I started having to deal with folks outside of the Indiana border on a regular basis.

      I still think DST is a pretty moronic idea, but standards are important when you are dealing with people that have no clue as to how your system works. And if it means better international business -- I'm all for it (for instance, from what I understand, its a hassle for airlines coming into Indiana -- every airport has laws governing take off and landing schedules, and the change means they adjust the schedule twice a year, or offer limited flight hours to make certain the routes are the same summer and winter).

    43. Re:No daylight savings time here by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Why are the two posts above me modded funny? o_0

      --
      No existe.
    44. Re:No daylight savings time here by pthisis · · Score: 1

      Are you going to finance extended Metro hours?
      Do you really want to eliminate noise pollution and disturbing the peace laws?

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    45. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Arizona, only married people want DST!

    46. Re:No daylight savings time here by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this from the nation that can't be bothered to switch to metric units. (if it weren't for the illegal drug trade, our kids would have no clue about metric units at all...)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    47. Re:No daylight savings time here by Zweideutig · · Score: 1

      Whoosh whoosh whoosh

      --
      Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    48. Re:No daylight savings time here by cdrudge · · Score: 1
      Thank goodness Indiana is going to implement DST statewide next year, though
      While DST may be implemented sometime next year, it's still up in the air as to which way counties go. Counties near Chicago have obvious reasons to go central, counties near Louisville and Cincinnati to go eastern. Now how about places like Fort Wayne. We are somewhat economically linked with Ohio as we draw a substantial labor force from across the border. Television and print media also have some distribution across the border so there is some compelling reason for us to go eastern as well. But we are also large enough that we could support going central like most of the rest of the state likely will go. Central counties, such as the areas around South Bend, have their feet in both sides, able to go either way and no matter which way they go will piss someone off.

      And the federal government has been little help either. All they say is "you decide which way you want to go and why." I just hope it doesn't end up that instead of a few counties being the "exception to the rule" like it is now, we don't have 1/2 the counties going one way and the other half going another. It's confusing enough already.
    49. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you kidding? We bring most of it in from the Colorado River. It's been like 50 years since the Salt River could actually have supported Phoenix's population.

      And if you want to know who is really pissed, ask Nevada. They were just a stick in the dirt when all these water agreements were signed decades ago and got a really small allocation.

    50. Re:No daylight savings time here by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

      misremembered and paraphrased from Ben Elton's Gridlock

      Flexi time was introduced to stagger start and finish times to help address peak hour traffic issues. The consequence of that is that peak hour traffic problems now start at 6am and run all day

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    51. Re:No daylight savings time here by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Geothermal Heat Pumps! Now we're talkin'!

      My Dad, about 17 years ago got holt of several hundred feet of stainless steel tubing. Nice fairly thick walls. We borrowed a drilling rig and bored seven shafts in the backyard. Each about 85 feet deep. Insert the tubing which Dad had wielded into long shinny 'wickets' about 78 feet long. Wield the 'wickets' together in series, and viola closed cooling loop. Add a heat exchanger in the form of a 130 gallon stainless steel canister. Add one reversible compressor and we had a geothermal heat pump.

      When the Heat Wave of 00 hit we had the electric company making inquires about how little electricity we were using in August and September of that year. --Much malevolent laughter on my and my Dad's part--

      I don't expect that the stainless steel tubing to give me problems over the next 30 years. A garbage can rack that my Dad made out of lower quality stainless in 1952 is still soldiering on with but the most minor degradation. Water line that Dad make from the same lot of tubing as the garbage can rack was used by several relatives as water pipes from their rural water wells. They have never clogged since they were installed in the late 40s. They have be reliable for nearly 60 years. I figure that my cooling loop should out last me.

      Since the cooling loop in the major difference between a standard heat pump and a geothermal heat pump I should not have any greater maintenance problems than one would have with a standard heat pump.

      With a house of just less than 1500 square feet I always get an electric bill of that is less than $100.00. Dad also had the house insulated out the wazoo, so that is also a help.

      I use mostly fluorescent lighting, and am considering running 12 V wiring to power LED lighting. LED lighting used in conjunction with a bank of deep cycle battering being charged by photovoltaic panels would likely cut my electric bill by about $5.00- $15.00/month. Depending on the hours of daylight of that month. Mainly though I want lighting that will work if the power gets cut off due to bad weather etc..

      I'm also strongly considering a solar assessed hot water system. He, he; the only natural gas that I'd use then would be for the cook stove.

      Yo! Utility companies, Kiss my grits...

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    52. Re:No daylight savings time here by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      play my radio audibly

      That was you? Damn it, turn it down!

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    53. Re:No daylight savings time here by TheDormouse · · Score: 1
      I just moved to Arizona last summer. I for one tell you it totally sucks to have the sun rise at 5am and set before 8pm.

      Daylight saving time would mean daylight from 6am-9pm in the summer like any reasonable day ought to be.

    54. Re:No daylight savings time here by glens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well I live in central Indiana and will likely move before this (if it ever) gets implemented. DST is an idiotic idea.

      This whole business of "losing business" because of lack of DST in Indiana is a steaming crock of BS. How hard is it to remember if you don't live here but deal on a regular basis with those who do that we don't change our freaking clocks? I can't remember ever having a problem remembering the time zones others live in and whether or not they change their clocks.

      If Arizona wasn't such a stinking wasteland I'd move back there again just to avoid the insanity.

      Have I heard correctly that Hawaii doesn't change either? Hmm...

    55. Re:No daylight savings time here by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      Same thing?

    56. Re:No daylight savings time here by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Are you going to finance extended Metro hours? Do you really want to eliminate noise pollution and disturbing the peace laws?

      No, but none of these things should be based on the time of the day.

    57. Re:No daylight savings time here by SimonInOz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely. In fact you don't go nearly far enough. Let's not have ANY timezones. Make the whole country a single timezone and deem noon in the capital 12:00 be midday.

      I mean, it worked for the USSR ... no, wait ...

      [Yes, this is true. The whole of the USSR, spanning five timezones, used to run on Moscow time. People in Kamchatka used to get up at midnight. Well, the clocks said midnight, anyway]

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    58. Re:No daylight savings time here by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify that, since obviously the time that the Metro runs is related to the time of the day. But those times should be chosen based on when there are enough people demanding service to make it necessary. If that means starting service at 4 AM in the summer and 5 AM in the winter, fine. You don't have to change the clocks to change the time that the subway runs.

      Same thing with noise pollution and disturbing the peace, only more so. This doesn't need to be based on the time of the day in the first place.

    59. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? We also celebrate Martin Luther King, Jr./Robert E. Lee's Birthday (as the two acutal birthdays are Janury 15 and 19, repectively).

      My only consolation is that you probably don't actually live in Alabama.

    60. Re:No daylight savings time here by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      They allow gay marridge in AZ? or has the female ./ readership just shot up above 3.

    61. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "If you want to go to work an hour earlier, just go to work an hour earlier."

      Except there's a whole trickle-down effect from the federal agencies that observe things like daylight saving time. It's a lot like federal holidays; sure, you can be open for business, but the more your business relies on, say, transactions at the Federal Reserve, the less work you're going to be doing for that hour between when you open and when the Federal Reserve opens. So far as commerce relies on groups of people coming together, the only way you can effectivley do something like this is all or none, otherwise the concept of standards becomes meaningless.

      "Noon should always be when the sun is directly over my time-zone."

      I'm surprised there isn't some sort of "bad atronomy" page on this.

      First off, time zones are not defined by two meridians. They start off that way, but then they move with respect to political boundaries in an attempt to keep states (or at least counties) synchronized. Otherwise Airzona would be split right down the middle (Arizona goes from about 109 W to 114 W, and the line "should" be at 112.5 W)

      Secondly, the length of time between two consecutive noons is never 86,400 seconds. The reason we developed mechanical timekeepers and then ultimately defined our length of time on something that has nothing to do with astronomy is that the sun is inconsistant. The earth's orbit is not circular, the earth's speed in that orbit is not constant, and the result is that, over regular 86.4 ks cycles, the sun traces a figure-eight over the course of a year.

      On 2005 October 30, when the US and the EU both go back to standard time zone, the sun will be directly over New Orleans (almost exactly 90 degrees west of Greenwich) at about 11:44 AM Central Standard Time. On Groundhog's Day next year, after racing past perihelion, "noon" will be 12:14 PM.

      "Change the start time instead of the clocks"

      That would defeat the purpose of having a standard schedule to begin with. People and other businesses need to plan around when you intend to operate, and a system where everybody's schedule drifts from time to time leads to confusion at best. It's better to change the standard frame of reference than to try to alter behavior within that frame of reference.

      If anything, what you're proposing more resembles the "logic" of setting your personal alarm clock ten mintues later than Daylight Saving Time. Both examples involve deviating from an accepted standard.

      "Do it gradually, the way available light changes gradually."

      First, if you're going to do it based on fractions of hours, why bother having time zones of integer hour differences to begin with? Why bother with time zones at all?

      Secondly, the amount of daylight during a day and the change of that amount between two consecutive days varies with latitude, not longitude. Just because you are able to describe the change as "gradual" in Arizona does not mean it is "gradual" in New York or Oregon. Daylight Saving Time makes less sense the closer you are to the Equator because there is less change in sunlight over the course of the year (how the Equator got its name), which is why Hawaii, in the tropics, doesn't follow it. However, even without leaving the contiguous 48, we can look at the Car Talk brothers in Massachusetts and their half-joking suggestion of going ahead two hours because, even with Daylight Saving Time, the sun was still rising at 5 AM EDT (a/k/a 4 AM EST).

      According to the US Naval Observatory sunrise in Boston on 2005 June 21 was 5:08 EDT (4:08 EST), with the sun being above the horizon for about 15.5 hours for that day.

      " That way you don't fuck up people's sleep cycles either."

      Not changing clocks seems to

    62. Re:No daylight savings time here by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1

      FYI, The USSR spaned 9 zones. The US spans 8. http://www.schaffter.com/cpu/tz.html

    63. Re:No daylight savings time here by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Daylight saving time would mean daylight from 6am-9pm in the summer like any reasonable day ought to be.

      Uh. no. It should not just start getting dark around the time you retire for bed. That's insane. What the hell are you going ot be doing outside at 9:00PM anyway?!

    64. Re:No daylight savings time here by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Same thing with noise pollution and disturbing the peace, only more so. This doesn't need to be based on the time of the day in the first place.

      So running a weedeater or lawnmower is the same at 2AM as it is at 2PM?

    65. Re:No daylight savings time here by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

      You must be new here, etc etc.

    66. Re:No daylight savings time here by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Replace "USSR" with "PRC," "Moscow" with "Beijing," and change the verb tenses to the present and you'd be right.

    67. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops. Wrong traitor. We celebrate General Robert E (Traitor) Lee's birthday on the day that most celebrate MLK. http://info.alabama.gov/calendar.aspx Jan 17: Martin Luther King, Jr./Robert E. Lee Birthday

    68. Re:No daylight savings time here by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      That's absurd. You can't just change 'business hours'. Business hours exist because they are times that are static and remain reliable across time zones.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    69. Re:No daylight savings time here by llefler · · Score: 1

      With a house of just less than 1500 square feet I always get an electric bill of that is less than $100.00.

      You left out the one bit of info that would allow anyone to evaluate your testimonial to geothermal, where you are located.

      How about this: I live near KC MO. I have an 8 year old furnace/ac unit and 2500 sq/ft of living area. 1400 upstairs, approx. 1100 in finished basement. My combined utility bill (elect/gas) is $130 a month. Level pay. 5 yr peaks are $150 in the summer and $250 in the winter. Despite having an attic fan, I switch from heating to cooling (never open windows) in the spring/fall because my office tends to overheat. And also, looking at my last bill (5/24 to 6/24) I get screwed for $35 a month for hot water (gas). My house is insulated, but could use more in the ceiling. It could stand better windows. And parking my truck in the air conditioned garage doesn't help either after it's been parked outside in 90+ degree temps, and driven home on the highway. And still my gas/electric system performs as well as yours?

      But having said that, when I build my new house I'm using ground source heat pumps and passive solar to heat the ground level floor and driveway.

      I just didn't find your argument compelling for 7 - 78 ft runs. BTW, my uncle heats/cools about 2500 sq/ft with 5 ground loops, trenched at 6 ft instead of drilled. Yours should be performing much better.

      BTW, the terminology is air sourced and ground sourced heat pumps.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    70. Re:No daylight savings time here by heybo · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree with you more. Why screw with the clock. Like you said just get up earlier.

    71. Re:No daylight savings time here by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Remember that KC has a stupid electric system, rivaled by that of California. Only more expensive. When people were bitching about the price hike, they were still paying half of what we pay.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    72. Re:No daylight savings time here by Coolpup · · Score: 1

      Indiana's reluctance to switch with the rest of the world is mainly due to the extreme lack of progress, morelike fear of progress, that grips the people of this fine state.

      As a resident of Indiana for 21 years, I feel liberated not to have to mess with all 7 clocks in my life. Only 3 of the 7 clocks I use are even capable of self-adjusting to DST (and one that does it anyway, so I have to reset it to the right time...but different story). Someone tell me what is actually so great about DST? How does pretending save anything? Hell, I can pretend it's January right now. That's not going to change the fact that it's 90 degrees.

    73. Re:No daylight savings time here by non-poster · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced that this is a great idea. Everybody on GMT... no more "is that eastern or central time?" Just say "call me at 20:00" and everybody is on the same page.

    74. Re:No daylight savings time here by trentblase · · Score: 1

      So... confused... which 8 time zones are these?

    75. Re:No daylight savings time here by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      As for the reservations, they pretty much do whatever they want within reason, and if they want to screw around with daylight savings time we're not going to stop them.

      Yeah, we've stolen all of their land, broken all of the treaties we signed with them and gave them blankets loaded with smallpox, least we can let them do is play with the clock.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    76. Re:No daylight savings time here by karnal · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot.

      Most people here are probably up way past what you think is a normal bedtime. For instance: it's 1:26am here, I have to be at work no later than 9am...

      I just am not a morning person. I hate the daylight.

      --
      Karnal
    77. Re:No daylight savings time here by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1

      From the link...
      1. Eastern
      2. Central
      3. Mountain
      4. Pacific
      5. Yukon (we don't have any in there, it's slid in there...)
      6. Alaska/Hawaii
      7. Nome
      8. Profit??? (looks like i miscounted)

    78. Re:No daylight savings time here by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      Judging from posts further up the thread, I assumed he was in Phoenix. When it is 115 degrees outside, an electric bill of $300 is not uncommon.

    79. Re:No daylight savings time here by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I just am not a morning person. I hate the daylight.

      EXACTLY my point. So who the hell would want daylight savings time?!?! Other than sun-dwelling FREAKS...

    80. Re:No daylight savings time here by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      I'm in East Texas. The ground temp. here is about 70 deg. F. It's great for heating in the mild Winters that we normally have here. Our Summers can be quite hot. In September of 2000 we set several records daily max temps. On Aug. 1 &2 the max temp. was 107 deg F, on the 3 & 4 the max was 109 deg F. There was a 103 deg F max temp on Aug 30th as well. The only reason that July and Aug did not have record temps was that some other years had very high record temps. For example July 31, 1969 was the all time max temp ever recorded at 111 deg F. 1909, 1911, and 1912 were very hot with several daily max temp. records.

      2000 was quite hot, and 1998 was also hot here in East Texas. In both cases the year over year electric use was higher than normal, but not astronomically so. This was in contrast to friends and relatives who live in the area, and had electric use sky-rocket compared to normal years.

      In my opinion the thing that I really love about my geothermal heat pump is that once installed and payed for, one needed not sweat a major bump in electric bills. In my case while the walls of my house are not insulated, my windows are double paned with storm window thrown in as a kicker, plus the attic is *heavily* insulated.

      The only way to insulate the walls properly would entail taring out the dry wall on the outside walls of the house in order to place the insulation in situ. Which would be an expensive proposition, as well as one that would be more than a little disruptive.

      My strategy is to reduce energy consumption via more efficient appliances lighting etc.. This can be done via a phase-in as older appliance fail. I'm also planning to go to a more efficient compressor when the time comes to replace the current one.

      As for the 7 runs of 78 feet...

      The 78 foot depth was decided upon due to the existence of an aquifer beneath my property at about 67 to 74 feet. Dad felt the aquifer would insure that the water in the heat exchanger would never get above 70 deg F, and thus insure that the freon going into the evaporator coil on the high pressure side would also be at 70 deg F.

      My Dad had the material which he got for a song, and the drilling rig was a borrowed. The cost of drilling extra 'wicket' shafts, and installing extra 'wickets' was minimal. So why not?

      Also, consider if one of the 'wickets' gets blocked you just route around it and you're up and running again in about 5 to 6 hours with six 'wickets' still going strong. Unless corrosion is the problem you can then at least attempt a clean out at your leisure.

      System redundancy is a good thing. Dad was a Master Aircraft Mechanic and considered redundancy a great design virtue. Finally, my house was built with the idea of adding a second story at some point in the future. So Dad's over-kill makes sense on that level as well.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    81. Re:No daylight savings time here by willpall · · Score: 1
      People who think DST is a good idea are like people who think setting their alarm clocks ten minutes later will improve the likelihood that they will get to work on time.

      You kidding me?! That worked for me for a week or so, then I caught on. So I decided to make it 20. Again I was fooled for a week. And so it went until the damn thing said it was noon at 6 am. Yeah, for some reason, it stopped working after a while.

      My idea for an alarm clock is one that randomly alters the true time between -10 to +30 min from the actual time. It would do this in the middle of the night, and when you woke up, you would know that the clock is wrong, but not by how much or in what direction. It would always be possible that you're be ten minutes late, so you'd have to assume you're always behind and hurry your lazy-ass up. That's what I need.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    82. Re:No daylight savings time here by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      By rest of the world do you mean rest of the US? The Far East doesn't support DST and Europe has DST that starts and ends on different dates than the US. Even if Indiana implements DST, there are still going to be complexities.

    83. Re:No daylight savings time here by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      I don't see what difference it makes when cunnilingus is performed.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    84. Re:No daylight savings time here by Detritus · · Score: 1

      If it was good enough for Gilgamesh, it's good enough for me.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    85. Re:No daylight savings time here by fbform · · Score: 1
      Make the whole country a single timezone.

      It works perfectly well for China (UTC +8) and India (UTC +5.5). The problem is not as bad as you make it out to be, if either most of the people live in one part (most of China's population is in the eastern 40% of the country) or the total discrepancy between the time zone and the local time is not greater than about 1 hour (India's total east-west distance is just short of two hours, so they use the median time for everyone).

      People in Kamchatka used to get up at midnight. Well, the clocks said midnight, anyway.

      That's not strange either. 60 million Ethiopians (and some other equatorial countries) experience dawn at 12:00 every day.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    86. Re:No daylight savings time here by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      you have 2500 sq/ft with normal electric/gas heat/cooling and you're paying 130/month energy costs in what another poster mentioned was one of the most expensive energy locations in the nation?

      interesting. i'm in ohio, with about the same specs on the house and average summer electric cost seems to be 110$ and above. gas heating in the winter is much more. i'm not on an average plan, but i just don't see how your bills can average 130/month...

    87. Re:No daylight savings time here by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      So running a weedeater or lawnmower is the same at 2AM as it is at 2PM?

      It's not the same, but it makes no sense to arbitrarily pick a cutoff point, what is reasonable depends on the specifics of the situation.

    88. Re:No daylight savings time here by flynns · · Score: 1

      Greetings from Northwest Florida!

      73,
      ki4iib

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    89. Re:No daylight savings time here by wakdjunkaga · · Score: 2, Informative

      Before you start doing the LED lighting conversion look into high energy capacitors (so-called "Supercaps"). I haven't run the numbers, but my guess is they aren't at a good price point yet. A design built around them would have the advantage of zero maintenance, and a working lifespan of about 10 years.

    90. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They allow gay marridge in AZ?

      I don't know, but I hear that they have a very progressive and modern policy of enforcing proper spelling with THE DEATH PENALTY MARRIAGE MARRIAGE MARRIAGE

    91. Re:No daylight savings time here by Golias · · Score: 1

      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.

      Gee, when you put it like that, Libertarians sound kind of cool.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    92. Re:No daylight savings time here by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      You're just bitter, obviously. :)

      If you'd spent any time in society working and doing anything else time based (such as watching the evening news), or various other things, you'd realize that DST was in fact useful, because those institutions you live your life around are forced to change as well. If I have to do SHIFT work, I have no choice to come in an hour earlier. Even if I don't clients will still come in an hour later, or worse leave at five, if I choose to leave at four. They're calling at five, I'm already on the way home. Doesn't look good to the boss or them.

      Also I DO adjust my clock. Its twenty minutes ahead of time and it just works for me. It really is a case of different strokes for diffrent folkes, some people are just like that.

      I'm not sure how insulting us (however vieldly), and then inventing imaginary potential problems (disrupted sleeping patterns, please!), is going to bring your (personal-centric) point across).

    93. Re:No daylight savings time here by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. Daylight is 4:30 AM to 6:30 PM on June 21 in central Japan -- worse up in Hokkaido where kids are waking home from school in the dark at 3 PM in winter.

      Japan's time zone is perfect if you live in Kyushu or Okinawa, but the government's stubborn insistence on not using DST (either it reminds them of the war, or it's a conspiracy to make us consume more electricity and prop up the energy companies) and on only having one time zone despite stretching over roughly 25 degrees of longitude.

      There can't be too many other places in the world who have "daylight losing" time zones, can there?

    94. Re:No daylight savings time here by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      The steel pipe heat pump is really cool. I like that idea.

      The thing you mentioned about photovoltaic cells to cut your electric bill by $5-$15/month may never pay for itself, depending on where you live though. Crunch the numbers for your local area first. I was just looking into that in Idaho, where I live. PV cells are still extremely expensive. They are selling at a cost of about $8/Watt. To completely run a home about 1500 square feet like yours would need around a 3-4KW system. That is $24K-$32K. Where I live in Idaho, it is a blessing that we have so much hydroelectric power that our rate is about 6 cents per KWhour. What that means for the PV aspect is that it will basically never pay for itself, and Idaho doesn't give any kind of incentives or anything for building PV installations. The power company is required to buy any excess you generate, but at 6 cents per KWhour, it wouldn't really get you anywhere fast.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    95. Re:No daylight savings time here by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      We? I don't remember doing any of that. In fact I'm pretty sure it was all done long before I was born.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    96. Re:No daylight savings time here by jjhall · · Score: 1

      I was actually looking into that last night. I'm a fellow Idahoan (Caldwell) myself. From my calculations, a 4KW system would take over 100 years to pay for itself in energy savings at our rates.

      The biggest advantage to PV systems in our area seems to be redundancy. Have the PVs charge a bank of batteries, and send the remaining juice to the house/grid. Of course at the cost, it may be cheaper in the long run just to charge from the grid as well.

      One alternative fuel source that I am interested in is BioDiesel. With the abundance of farm products and wastes we have in this area, we could (and should be) a lot farther along on the renewable energy front.

      Shoot me an e-mail if you like, it could be interesting chatting about our local options.

      Jeremy

      P.S. I work for a company that used to be a part of yours. :-)

    97. Re:No daylight savings time here by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      But it's a dry heat, right? ;-)

    98. Re:No daylight savings time here by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      VOTES_FOR_UTC++

    99. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thumb it's nose
      thumbs it's nose

      "its".

    100. Re:No daylight savings time here by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Arizona's position on Daylight Saving Time is enlightened, and we should all follow their shining example.

      Noon should always be when the sun is directly over my time-zone.


      Unless you live very close to the equator this is impossible without some form of correction in the form of a time-shift (e.g. DST). You might not notice the difference if you are in AZ, but those of us in WA and other Northern states do.

    101. Re:No daylight savings time here by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      This article from Wired describes a new system that might be attractive to you once it goes into full production. Of course, Idaho probably isn't the most effective location for solar power...

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.07/solar.htm l?pg=1&topic=solar&topic_set=

    102. Re:No daylight savings time here by CaseM · · Score: 1

      Only a couple.

    103. Re:No daylight savings time here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I'm not convinced that it will save energy when Phoenix air conditioning costs are factored in. In the summer my electric bill hovers around $300 because of air conditioning. I think they would save more energy by promoting compact fluorescent bulbs.

      And how about a little solar power? I'm visiting Phoenix at the moment, being baked by the sun, and yet I haven't seen a single solar water heater or power panel on the roofs of any of the houses here. Even in the northereastern US where there's no sun by comparison, these things are all over the place. Here there's no excuse (apparently the homeowners associations make it difficult, because any sign of other than willfully profligate prosperity is unsightly).

      But you will be happy to know that just last night I persuaded my host (who had never heard of them before) to buy a bunch of compact fluourescent bulbs while we were at Home Depot.

      Anyway, in a few days I return home to where it is over 90 degrees every day of the year but my electric bill stands at around $5/month because the building is intelligently designed and stays comfortable without A/C.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    104. Re:No daylight savings time here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless you somehow still have their land.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    105. Re:No daylight savings time here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Flexi time was introduced to stagger start and finish times to help address peak hour traffic issues. The consequence of that is that peak hour traffic problems now start at 6am and run all day

      That doesn't seem very logical.

      If congestion is now lasting all day, it could not be helped by making everyone commute at the same time. The problem is that there are too many cars. A quantity of cars that is too great to fit on the roads between 6am and 10am could not possibly fit on the roads between 6am and 7am.

      And no, the solution is not more or wider roads - that just makes congestion worse. The solution is more staggered hours, more telecommuting, and more non-blocking transport such as commuter trains.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    106. Re:No daylight savings time here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      60 million Ethiopians (and some other equatorial countries) experience dawn at 12:00 every day.

      Really, "other equatorial countries"? Who else uses the whacked Ethiopian clock? And since when was Ethiopia equatorial, anyway?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    107. Re:No daylight savings time here by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      And how did they get it? Well lets see killing the tribes that occupied it before them.

      Sorry no guilt is had by me on this issue.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    108. Re:No daylight savings time here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Most tribes were pretty peaceful. There was enough land to go around. Don't get your history from John Wayne movies.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    109. Re:No daylight savings time here by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      Actually, the clocks thing works, to an extent.

      Obviously, if I'm concious, it won't work, cause I'll just mentally change the time. But on something like a bedside alarm clock, it works great. Barely concious, I reach over and hit the snooze button and look at the face. About half the time, I go "mmmfmfmfm*", throw myself out of bed, and wander around until I get into the shower. The rest of the time I go "mmfmfmmmf*" and kinda vegge for a few minutes, knowing I've got those few minutes to acclimate back to the real world, and then I get up.

      Frankly, it was the only reason I occasionally made it to class last semester.

      *translates to: awww, fuck. *translates to: awww, fuck it. It's morning, my vocabulary is a bit limited...

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    110. Re:No daylight savings time here by llefler · · Score: 1

      What this boils down to is, you are placing the blame on the corporation for something a fan did.

      You are confused. I pay 7.25 cents a KWH for the first 600 and 7.46 cents a KWH after that. Which appears to be below the national average by about 1 cent. My service is through Aquila. KC MO proper is served by KCPL, and their rates are comparable. Where I feel I do get screwed is on gas service. Aquila passes along a 'supply charge' that tends to be outrageous.

      During California's energy fiasco, utilities we charged up to 51 cents a KWH.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    111. Re:No daylight savings time here by llefler · · Score: 1

      you have 2500 sq/ft with normal electric/gas heat/cooling and you're paying 130/month energy costs in what another poster mentioned was one of the most expensive energy locations in the nation?

      I believe the other poster was mistaken. My actual usage for 5/24 to 6/24 was 761 KWH. After taxes that is $68. 7.25 cents/KWH for the first 600 and 7.46 cents/KWH after that.

      I do get a bonus in that my house is shaded by several 50 yr old trees. With my AC set at 77, my system shuts off for long periods of time even during the day. We lost power yesterday at 5pm (blown transformer) for 45 minutes, and my house only warmed up by 1 degree. My server was about 5 minutes from shutting down though. I thought I was going to have an excuse to install that memory that has been waiting for a shutdown to get installed.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    112. Re:No daylight savings time here by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      In DC, they constrain when I can buy beer, play my radio audibly, ride the subway, etc.


      I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    113. Re:No daylight savings time here by fbform · · Score: 1
      Really, "other equatorial countries"?

      Here you go: "other equatorial countries" (scroll right down to the end).

      And since when was Ethiopia equatorial, anyway?

      Equatorial in this context means that day and night are very nearly equal to each other throughout the year. It doesn't necessarily imply an equatorial climate or the presence of rain forests.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    114. Re:No daylight savings time here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid your website is incorrect. And equatorial countries are those that straddle the Equator.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    115. Re:No daylight savings time here by willpall · · Score: 1
      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

      As long as we're replying to sigs here, I did notice yours earlier in the thread... made may head explode. It reminds me of when people would say things like, "Look at the kitty, he thinks he's better than us" and I'd reply, "STOP ANTHROPOMORPHIZING THE FUCKING CAT... HE DOESN'T LIKE IT!"

      By the way, I didn't make mine up, don't remember where I got it, but it was longer than that (and longer than 120 char.)

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    116. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      Indeed

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    117. Re:No daylight savings time here by WCityMike · · Score: 1

      CrazyTalk: Could be worse - you could live in Indiana, a small state which effectively has THREE time zones (Central with DST near Chicago, and Eastern time with or without DST depending on where you are in the state.

      Not any more. On Wednesday, April 28, 2005, Indiana's Senate passed a bill to move Indiana to DST, and on Thursday, April 29, 2005, their House passed it. See this Indianapolis Star article.

    118. Re:No daylight savings time here by kb7oeb · · Score: 1

      If your pipes run through the attic you don't need a solar water heater, the water is warm enough for a shower even on the coldest setting.

      It would probably save me lots of money since my water heater is electric

    119. Re:No daylight savings time here by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      If you've ever been to Arizona in the summer, you'd realize that you'd have to be insane to want to do anything outside while the sun's still up. I'm surprised they haven't come up with a plan to set all the clocks 12 hours ahead and just sleep when it's hottest out.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    120. Re:No daylight savings time here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enlightened isn't the word. Arizona avoids going on Daylight savings time to thumb it's nose at the Federal Government.

      Sounds enlightened to me....

      At the same time, the Navajo Nation in Arizona thumbs it's nose at the Arizona State Government by going on daylight savings time

      Double enlightenment! This is hilarious...

    121. Re:No daylight savings time here by geistbear · · Score: 1

      At the same time the Hopis thumb their noses at the Navajos and ignore DST.

    122. Re:No daylight savings time here by Tower · · Score: 1

      As it was so well put in my favorite TV Series- "What kind of shmuck-ass system is this?"

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  8. Didn't we just argue over this? by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why this is comming across the headlines again but, I'll say it again.

    Embeded devices. Clocks, DVD players, etc. Anything thats not network accessable that can be patched - is going to be screwed.

    1. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'll just think it's the wrong time. Makes no difference to DVD players. Important for clocks, but these can be set manually twice a year.

      Few devices adjust for DST. To my knowledge, only computers do this. And that can be turned off and done manually if need be.

    2. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by fwr · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That would be changing it four times a year. You'd have to set it back manually the three weeks before the current start of DST. Then, you'd have to set it again when the device changed the time on it's own, on the existing DST date. Then you'd need to do the opposite towards the end. You'd need to reset it back when the device changed it on the existing date, then set it forward on the new DST date.

    3. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, that is a problem.

      Now, if only there were some way to change the instruction set that a computer executes...

    4. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Few devices adjust for DST. To my knowledge, only computers do this.

      Let me just look around my room here... My TV does. So does my VCR. There are lots of things out there besides 'computers' that adjust for DST. Certainly my TV and VCR aren't 'patchable' to changes to when the time changes occur.

    5. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Just how many devices adjust for DST without it being possible to disable this feature?

      Come to think of it, how many adjust for DST and can't be adjusted?

      My computer it can be disabled. Or corrected with a simple patch. My clock gets a time signal by radio. This requires the people who run the time broadcast station to change it at the correct time. they do this. My video recorder gets its time signal from the TV station (and this can be disabled). They adjust for local time. All other devices with a clock, I need to change manually.

    6. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My TV does. So does my VCR

      Don't these use the time code encoded in the VBI in TV broadcasts?

    7. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by KenBot_314 · · Score: 1

      If you moved to a state that didn't use DST, what would you do with your TV and VCR then?

    8. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Few devices adjust for DST. To my knowledge, only computers do this. And that can be turned off and done manually if need be.

      The two atomic clocks I just bought do. Fortunately, I live in California. If I lived in Eastern time, these things would be doorstops (since you can't set them forward an hour because there's no U.S. time zone over there).

      Any way you cut it, though, I'm really pissed. I just spent all that money so I wouldn't have to set my (&@#^$&@ clocks forward and back manually, and our lovely idiots in charge manage to screw things up yet again.

      Guess I should be used to the Republicans screwing me, though; both my parents are teachers.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Turn off the DST setting. But there is no way to adjust it for states that use it, but at different dates that are hardwired into it.

    10. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Nope. It's directly set in the clock setting of the TV. Same with the VCR. You turn on/off the DST setting there, as well as set the time.

      Why would it use the code in the TV broadcast? What if you lived on the border of a time code/switch area and could recieve signals from stations on different sides of the border? Which time should the TV use? It uses whatever time you use, and set it to.

    11. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Why would it use the code in the TV broadcast? What if you lived on the border of a time code/switch area and could recieve signals from stations on different sides of the border? Which time should the TV use?

      Well, mine uses the time from the station I tell it to.

    12. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      That's a nice feature. Unfortunately, not all TVs have it.

    13. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      But there is no way to adjust it for states that use it, but at different dates that are hardwired into it.

      Now that's just really stupid. The DST dates have changed many times over history. It would take a real dimwit to assume that the dates would never change again in the future.

    14. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by J.Random+Hacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Relax -- your investment in atomic clocks (really radio-controlled) is safe :) They get DST from the master clock already.

      All of the radio-controlled or "atomic" clocks work on the same idea -- they receive a time signal from a low-frequency transmitter (60kHz in the US). The device will typically set an internal quartz clock from the received time code. The time reference signal is strongest at night, so it's typical for these clocks to set themselves at 2 or 3 am (local time). Some newer designs will set whenever the signal strength is high enough for a good read. This redundancy makes for a very reliable device.

      The time code contains, among other things, a flag indicating whether DST is in effect. So -- when (if?) this change to the DST rules goes into effect, the folks who run the transmitter will change the flag at the proper moment, and the next time your clock reads the signal, et viola! it reads DST.

      The radio station broadcasting the time code in the US is WWVB, and it is managed by NIST. The WWBV system is really an elegant design, involving a wonderful mixture of old and new technology. Check it out:

      http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwvb.htm

      By the way, there are 4 other time zones east of US Eastern. The Atlantic time zone, for example applies in Nova Scotia. There are also similar time reference broadcasts in the EU, Russia, and Australia. There might also be one in China - but I've never needed to look that one up. I'm sure that will change one day soon.

    15. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well my tv doesnt even have a clock and my vcr doesnt keep track of the date, so your points are equally invalid

    16. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by tricorn · · Score: 1

      The WWVB broadcast contains DST information. As long as every place in the US switches on the same day, and they don't change the switch time from 2AM, any "Atomic Clock" will automatically do the right thing. See the time code format information from NIST (although, annoyingly, it show two DST bits, but says the descriptions of them are "in the text", which is only available (as far as I can find) in a PDF of NIST Time and Frequency Services.

      It probably explains the behavior of my clock, which goes to DST properly, but then goes back to standard time at 0000 UTC. It is probably resetting the "going to DST" bit at the new day, but not setting the "now in DST" bit. The next time it picks up a broadcast after 0000, the bit is set correctly and it fixes itself.

      There's an interesting bit in one of the publications that says that devices should have a rule to change the DST setting if it hasn't received the signal for a while. I think it should probably NOT change the DST setting at all until it has received a signal, unless the user manually overrides.

    17. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by metallidrone · · Score: 1

      Or a "brilliant" marketroid. "Well, if it changes, they have to buy a new unit!"

    18. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, my handheld gaming system does. The firmware may or may not be patchable, but I don't know if I want to take the risk for something as trivial as DST.

    19. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Not really. My alarm clock is the only thing in my home that doesn't self adjust to DST,and that's because it's not designed to. So I set it manually at the appointed time.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    20. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      My vcr's clock updates on some tv signal to the current time, my MCEPC updates via NTP.. no issues there.. then again, I live in arizona, and don't have to play the ignorant games.. :)

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    21. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you could set them yourself like you do your alarm clock, which has no notion of a calendar.

    22. Re:Didn't we just argue over this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then your alarm clock sucks.

      Perhaps you should buy one from Oregon Scientific like all *us* geeks that sets itself wirelessly from one of the many US atomic clock signals (or others worldwide, although Oregon Scientific's clocks don't work there). Some even have DST correction built in for those occasions it can't set itself (of course that will break too).

      The only thing I ever have to set at DST changes is the analog wall clock. My stove doesn't have a clock, nyahh!

  9. More trouble by mfloy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems like it is going to be a great deal of trouble. Although most software will be fairly easily patched, it still seems like a hastle. People will inevitably forget to patch, and different will be handling time differently.

    1. Re:More trouble by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people who don't get it right will simply change their clocks, and then however long later when their clocks change automatically, they'll scratch their heads, and change them again. Just like people handled daylight savings time before computers, only with more changes, and some of them more puzzling.

      Of course, that only accounts for systems that have people sitting at them and who happen to glance at the clock. I predict that there will be some servers that are off by an hour for a while, but that it will not cause many problems. Except possibly with authentication that depends on time synchronization, like kerberos.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:More trouble by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will destroy civilization. The foretold second coming of your lord and savior will be imminent. Mankind is doomed. Invest in underground bunkers and stockpile cans of food and MREs!

    3. Re:More trouble by Mr+Z · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not nice. Us four-digit ID folks shouldn't pick on the six digit guys like that. They're gullible, I tell you. Gullible!

    4. Re:More trouble by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Did you know the word 'gullible' is not in the dictionary? I didn't believe it myself at first.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:More trouble by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I predict that there will be some servers that are off by an hour for a while, but that it will not cause many problems.

      I though most servers ran on GMT, not local time. Mine do, anyway.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:More trouble by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Internally, Unix-like systems keep time as GMT. However, log files are often written using local time.

      Fixing this on virtually all Unix-like systems (including Linux and Mac OSX) is simply a matter of modifying the timezone files. Many (most?) systems now use compiled zone info files, which keeps historical track of when changes occurred (which means that on such a system, you'll get correct translations of GMT times for this year, even when checking it next year using the new start/end times).

      Where this will be a pain is with embedded systems, e.g. VCRs, TV sets, some watches/clocks, thermostats, microwave ovens, etc. Of course, many of those systems don't do automatic adjustments, some do it based on a broadcast signal (which I believe includes a DST flag), and "Atomic Clocks" get the signal from WWV, which does have a DST flag. As long as every place in the US that switches from/to DST does so on the same day, and they don't change the switchover time to something other than 1AM/2AM, there should be no problem.

      I have an "Atomic Clock" wall clock which always adjusts forward (11 hours forward to go one hour backward). When switching to standard time, it does its thing right at 2AM. Then, I think at 0000 UTC, it skips forward one hour back to DST, and then at midnight or 1AM or something it goes back to being correct. Not sure if it does it when going the other direction. I think it has something to do with a "DST change pending" flag vs. a "current DST setting" value, and getting confused when the first one turns off after the end of the day it changes.

    7. Re:More trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! I just looked in the dictionary and found it! You tricked me!

      *cough*

      STFU you stupid moron.

    8. Re:More trouble by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Good question. I have a couple of the atomic clocks, very cool to not have to ever set them. My guess is they don't "know DST" but simply pickup and adjust according to the default time zone you choose to display (Eastern, in my case). But this is just a guess.

      Every car in the world should use atomic clocks. They are the worse about getting off time. They are also cheap now.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:More trouble by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Although most software will be fairly easily patched, it still seems like a hastle.

      It's going to be an insignificant drop in the patch ocean. For example, the Fedora project has been spewing out patches and upgrades at the rate of > 1GB per month. Updating one little timezone file will be nothing.

      In this age of multiple monthly critical security bugs posted for every OS on the market, if you haven't done any updates at least once by this fall, you've got bigger problems than an unset clock.

    10. Re:More trouble by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      Invest in underground bunkers and stockpile cans of food and MREs!

      MREs or death.......I choose death.

    11. Re:More trouble by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Yup, you select the base zone (e.g. Central = -6), and whether or not DST applies to your location. If you enable DST, then it automatically adjusts based on the setting in the broadcast.

      My car clock is off by several seconds a day, very annoying. Even more annoying is that the car has On-Star, which gets a GPS signal, and is connected in to the radio (which is where the clock is). Why can't it just update the clock whenever it has the correct time from the GPS? It would also be nice if it had a data port to transmit the GPS location for use by a PDA.

      Even worse than my car is the clock in one of my Linksys routers. It is fast by about 8 seconds per MINUTE, and only updates from an NTP server once every hour or two. I don't understand why it can't adjust the timebase of the clock to correct the error, it doesn't even have to do a full NTP synchronization, just say "hmm, clock says one hour, NTP say 50 minutes, reset clock and adjust timebase as needed".

      For non-atomic watches, how hard would it be to do the same thing, based on my manually setting the time? My watch is fairly stable, but fast by about 20 seconds a month. If I set it at the beginning of the month, then set it again at the end of the month, it should be able to be accurate to within a few seconds per year (if I'm using an accurate and precise source).

    12. Re:More trouble by Big+Jason · · Score: 1

      You call that a four-digit ID?

    13. Re:More trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waaaah.... go get your binky.

    14. Re:More trouble by rylin · · Score: 1

      I hear there's a great solution for SPS! Google for "v1@gr4" and you should find a bunch of results.

    15. Re:More trouble by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Another one of these threads?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    16. Re:More trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope I don't forget to patch the Acros BIOS on my I386sx.

  10. I'm feeling this already by fixer007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did someone turn the clock back to the discussion we already had on this issue?

    1. Re:I'm feeling this already by dereference · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, and apparently they un-learned that it is "Daylight Saving Time" not "Daylight Savings Time" as well!

  11. international flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    from the article:

    "and airline officials said it would have complicated scheduling of international flights."

    But the US and Europe already change to daylight savings at different times and some countries don't implement it at all. So how does it really make any difference?

    1. Re:international flights by PainBot · · Score: 1

      The problem is this should have been planned before people booked their flights. Things like this should be planned at least a year in advance. I can't belive they're trying to do this now.

    2. Re:international flights by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      I would give that more impact that it "could adversely affect livestock". I grew up on a farm and I never saw a horse, cow, pig, chicken, or any thing else that could tell time. I am not sure how they expect this to affect livestock.

      I am sure that it will affect farmers somewhat. I remember during the energy crisis of the 70's the beginning of DST was earlier and I remember standing in the dark waiting for the school bus in the morning. But I also remember having more daylight when I got home. I don't remember hearing any of the livestock complain, but then we didn't have any computers in the house at time, much less in the barn or pastures.

      I really liked that comment. I can't believe that anyone would truly believe it to be factual however.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    3. Re:international flights by rwade · · Score: 1

      A flight is scheduled to leave New York and arrive in London. A passenger has to connect to another flight to Berlin.

      With this new scheme, that passenger who might have had a 1 hour gap between arriving in London and leaving for Berlin now has a no time gap.

    4. Re:international flights by PainBot · · Score: 1

      Uh ? No.
      The timetables will change and that's the problem: letting people know.

    5. Re:international flights by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Erm... actually, I imagine the flights will all still take off and land at the same times GMT, and the local times will need to be shifted around. So, if you booked the 9AM EST flight, it's now a 10AM EDT flight.

    6. Re:international flights by PigIronBob · · Score: 1

      Add to this that all countries in the Southern Hemisphere have their daylight saving during the Northern winter. so again, what IS the problem?

      --
      You never catch me alive
    7. Re:international flights by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I would give that more impact that it "could adversely affect livestock". I grew up on a farm and I never saw a horse, cow, pig, chicken, or any thing else that could tell time. I am not sure how they expect this to affect livestock.

      Here is one simple example off of the top of my head: A part-time farmer gets off work in town at 5pm, drives home by 5:45pm, changes his clothes and milks his cows at 6pm. Time "falls back" by one hour. He's not off work yet at 5pm but the cows want to be milked. Cows get very unhappy in that situation.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:international flights by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Why would the timetable between London and Berlin change? I doubt it would. The guy on the connecting flight from USA is gonna be screwed.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    9. Re:international flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local curfews on the latest time a flight can arrive/depart. Many international flights get off the ground or land at odd hours of day, and if the timetables stay the same relative to GMT, the 1 hour shift can put those flights into curfew hours.

    10. Re:international flights by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      You are correct in that the cows aren't happy about this, but it already happens. It is just transferred by a little time. And the affect of this is very short lived as the cows get used to the new schedule just like the farmer gets used to it. Their milk production is based on the last time they were milked.

      Given that the comment was that "according to some senators", do you believe that there is a part-time farmers lobby? No, this came for the big farmers and their lobby. I don't know why they are against this, but it isn't part-time farmers.

      More likely part-time farmers would be for this. Why? Well, this means an extra hour of daylight in the afternoon, when he would likely be more able to do things on the farm. It is difficult to do farm work and then head for the day job (even though some things must be done in the morning as well like milking your cow). If the available daylight could be better grouped he could be much more efficient. Think about working on a fence, that is difficult to spend an hour in the morning and then an hour in the afternoon, but if those two hours could be grouped together better, then you can get some real work done.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    11. Re:international flights by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      Seems to me, when we change to daylight time, the 'published departure time' changes by an hour, but the actual flight time (measured in gmt) remains exactly the same. This is probably related to the fact that slot times are assigned in GMT, and, they dont change just because politicians want to change the clocks a couple of times a year. The international connections will be just fine, you just gotta realize, the 'local time' for departures and arrivals may change, cuz they will stay fixed in GMT.

      Been thru this daylight change a time or two, and it's never had any affect on my flight schedule in years gone past. I've always done flight assignments in GMT, dont think that's gonna change just cuz daylight time changes. The reality is, the whole industry does it this way too, it's only the last step along the way, publish for public that you convert arrival/departure times from GMT to local, and, it's trivial to change that conversion factor.

      Another detail, on your scenario, the timing of the flight will be driven by the availability of slots in London. A heathrow slot is FAR more precious than any slot in the usa. An airline with an arrival slot for heathrow will schedule the flight to make that slot, all other considerations go out the window. It really doesn't matter how convenient/inconvenient the departure time on this side of the pond is, because the entire schedule is driven by when you are permitted to arrive. It's WAY easier to negotiate/swap slots at JFK than heathrow, so in your scenario, the airline will thank the gods they have an arrival slot for London, and then do whatever it takes to get the departure slot that fits on this side of the pond. Once the slots are in order, they will publish a schedule, and the passengers can take it or leave it.

      Aviation is a global industry, where everybody works in the same time zone, gmt. A change in how daylight time is done wont affect operations at all, but it may cause grief for customer service agents dealing with public that's do dumb to understand an hour offset from previously published schedules due to the daylight time changes.

    12. Re:international flights by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      The timetable from New York would change measured in local time, it would remain constant measured in GMT. Arrival and departure slots are assigned in GMT, the airline cant just decide to change thier departure time because the local politicians changed the local clocks. In this particular case, the Heathrow slots are the most precious, so, the airlines will change the 'local time' for departure/arrival on the other end, cuz they are NOT gonna get an hour offset on the Heathrow slot. The new york departure will leave at the exact same time it used to (gmt), and if that happens to mean it 'looks different' in local time, so be it. Your guy coming from the usa will have no problem with the connection, assuming he's smart enough to figure out the new 'local time' for departure. If not, blame the politicians for coming up with such a hair brained scheme on such short notice. Contrary to popular belief, the world does not revolve around the eastern time, most of the worlds infrastructure that requires synchronization across time zones operates on gmt.

      In the long run, this is probably good for the aviation industry. There's going to be a lot of folks missing international flights for a couple of months, and they will be entitled to refunds because the airlines changed the 'apparent' schedules. It'll probably take one more of the insolvent airlines, and push em over the edge into bankruptcy. The industry needs to lose at least one more big airline if it's going to survive.

  12. Impact of plain DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It causes ppl to give times on slashdot for a timezone (EST) that no one uses in summer (USA East Coast is currently under EDT).

  13. Who elects these guys? by pHatidic · · Score: 2
    "Kids across the nation will soon rejoice," said Upton, because they'll have another hour of daylight trick-or-treating.

    Right...

    1. Re:Who elects these guys? by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Fuck the kids. I want my extra hour of dark Halloween partying.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Who elects these guys? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Upton's an idiot, elected by the not-very-perceptive people of SW Michigan. My boyfriend was one of his perpetually-disappionted constituents.

      As a kid, I was always relieved by the time change in October. Is there anything lamer than daylight trick-or-treating?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Who elects these guys? by taniwha · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This guy is a plain bozo ... or has never had little kids ... the best part of trick-or-treating is the magic of wandering the neighborhood looking at all the jack-o-lanterns and other decorations - what's the point of doing it in the daylight?

      We travelled the world with my (now older) kids last year .... halloween found us in India ... pumpkins were in short supply ... in the end we carved watermelons, they work great if you leave a little red flesh

    4. Re:Who elects these guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the kids.

      Pedophile :-P

    5. Re:Who elects these guys? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Is there anything lamer than daylight trick-or-treating?

      Freezing your ass off waiting for the school bus in the dark on a February morning, listening to some pompous know-it-all talk about how Indiana should switch to DST in the summer so that kids don't have to wait for the bus in the dark.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  14. Logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Webserver logs (and other logs) might get timestamps that doesn't correspond with the actual time, unless they patch the OS.

    1. Re:Logs by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Log in GMT, then. Just set your TZ variable in your .bashrc or whatever and you're golden. Is it really that hard?

  15. Not a big deal for *nix by Fantasy+Football · · Score: 1

    While doing work for some telecom companies down in Brazil I ran into this because evidently (depending on province) they pass a resolution each year determining when to start DST and when to come off, usually planning around holidays and the whims of people in those positions. They have suggested dates, but they sometimes vary from year to year.

    For most *nix systems, look in /usr/share/lib/zoneinfo for zone definition files. If you're lucky (or have Solaris), there's a src directory in there.

    You'll find a README file with a reference to a place with updated zone files].

    On the other hand you could try to roll your own like I did for Belo Horizonte and edit the rules in one of the source files (I would think "northamerica" for the US ;)

    Do a man zic for more info on compiling and then distributing to other systems.

  16. Change to the US DST - purpose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To cause a psychological break point by plunging the country into low-grade chaos, marking the end of the Land of the Free, and the beginning of the glorious New American Reich Century?

  17. FRIST PSOT!!!!!!11!!! by EEBaum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately, due to inconsistent implementation of Daylight Savings, an erroneous timestamp will cause the system to place this post significantly further down the list. Rest assured, though, that this post was made an hour before the timestamp shows, and was, therefore, first.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  18. Reason #7,234 -- Daylight Savings Time Headaches by mrshoe · · Score: 1

    Did we really need one more reason to move to Hawaii?

    --
    There are two types of people in this world: those that categorize other people and those that don't.
  19. Yup. by keesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'll need an update to /usr/share/zoneinfo/ . Expect the next Debian release in late 2012 to support this.

    1. Re:Yup. by st1d · · Score: 1

      Luckily, most people that use Debian are "unstable", which should have a fix in the pipeline, er, fifteen minutes after the bill initially hit paper. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  20. Daylight Savings makes everyone feel sunnier! by game+kid · · Score: 1
    "The beauty of daylight-saving time is that it just makes everyone feel sunnier," said Markey.

    I smell a new viral sig.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:Daylight Savings makes everyone feel sunnier! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. From my own observation it is clear that when savings time is in effect, all it does is cause people to get up later. In Canada, most shops only open at 10am or 10h30 even.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  21. daylight savings kills people by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

    ...following the spring shift to Daylight Savings Time (when one hour of sleep is lost) there is a measurable increase in the number of traffic accidents that result in fatalities.
    http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevoluti on/2005/07/does_dalight_sa.html

    daylight saving is dumb anyway.

  22. Just great... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

    Now I have to figure out how to actually set the clock in the car. Today, I just wait it out for half a year for things to sync up.

    (kidding)

  23. Cows Use Clocks? by mlmitton · · Score: 0
    The best line from the article:

    "According to some senators, farmers complained that a two-month extension could adversely affect livestock"

    +5 funny for CNN

    --
    "My girlfriend's got sodium laureth sulfate hair."
    1. Re:Cows Use Clocks? by st1d · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe if the evenings are longer, they'll be too tired for...uh, nevermind. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  24. My apologies... by game+kid · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but don't worry. Daylight Savings Pwnage is a common occurrence, within and without Slashdot.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  25. This ougta mod well. by hellomynameisclinton · · Score: 1

    Daylight Saving I always post this when the topic comes up. I'm a fan of Franklin and really enjoy reading this.

    Sweden changed the DST period few years ago. As far as I remember there were no big problems.

    What I'd prefer is that they passed a law making the hours between 9:00 am and 5:00 pm shorter.

    Next thing you know Bush will make us use a calandar based on how many days it has been since Jesus died. That would be absurd.

    ----------
    Rather than complain about the dupes today, I'll use them to be insightful and funny. Besides, I like THIS thread more than that other one.

    /plagiarism

    1. Re:This ougta mod well. by yuriismaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next thing you know Bush will make us use a calandar based on how many days it has been since Jesus died. That would be absurd.

      It's be simple to implement: day = oldDay + jesus.lifespan()

      Except when you get the compile-time error: ERROR: jesus is not defined

    2. Re:This ougta mod well. by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      thing is, Jesus *is* defined. he died some time around 32AD. check out Josephus. he records the existence, life, and death (however briefly) of Jesus.

      i'll leave it at that.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    3. Re:This ougta mod well. by dhasenan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The complete corpus of Josephus regarding Jesus: "Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day." -- Antiquities, ch. 18 Another version reads as follows: "At this time there was a wise man who was called Jesus, and his conduct was good, and he was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. And those who had become his disciples did not abandon their loyalty to him. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion, and that he was alive. Accordingly they believed that he was the Messiah, concerning whom the Prophets have recounted wonders." This version was preserved in Arabic--much like most Greek philosophy currently known to us. To be more relevant to the grandparent, you can't call a method on an object before defining the method. And in this case, you can't call the method before the object is defined.

  26. Let's give it up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for giving up standard time.

    We should just stay permanently on Daylight Saving Time.

    All the BS about "kids going to school in the dark" and "more accidents" is just that - BS not based on any facts or numbers - just an invention by people interested in manipulating the time system for their own benefit.

  27. Nothing* by dago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    * May vary dependig on your location, only applies outside of the USA.

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  28. As a Canadian... by NamShubCMX · · Score: 4, Informative
    It means we won't have the same time for a few weeks than our southern neighbors... and all the trouble that means...

    (Until we follow you guys)

    --
    We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    1. Re:As a Canadian... by Sebby · · Score: 2, Informative
      "(Until we follow you guys)"

      That's assuming every province adopts it. Saskatchewan never adopted the original change.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    2. Re:As a Canadian... by TyrelHaveman · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was informed that Canada plans to do the exact same thing at the same time, so that things don't get REALLY screwed up. This really seems more like something Canada would do than the US would do anyway...
      By the way, if they keep doing this every now and then, eventually we'll be on DST all-year-round anyway, then it won't matter anymore.
      Clocks are fairly irrelevent to me anyway. I go to work in the morning and come home in the afternoon, some time. It is useful for coordinating meetings, but other than that... pfft..

    3. Re:As a Canadian... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      If you can handle spanning multiple time zones already, I think you can handle this. After all, how many Canadians don't have the same time as Ottawa?

      I mean, you're not exactly China.

    4. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a matter handling multiple time zones across the country, it's keeping in sync with US markets - Montreal and Toronto working the same hours as New York and so forth. Toronto is the 3rd largest financial centre in North America so they (as in the banks) would follow suit even if no one else did.

      I can't see it causing a problem though. Obviously Canada would also extend DST, and justifiably so because it's actually a good idea. Since the world is going to be in an energy crunch for the near future it sure can't hurt.

    5. Re:As a Canadian... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "It's not a matter handling multiple time zones across the country, it's keeping in sync with US markets - Montreal and Toronto working the same hours as New York and so forth."

      What about London and Tokyo? Should they change to Eastern Time as well?

    6. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But. . . without knowing the time, how do you know when to tune to Adult Swim to catch Futurama?

  29. Re:Reason #7,234 -- Daylight Savings Time Headache by kc32 · · Score: 2, Funny

    One reason to stay out of Hawaii: Electricity is expensive as hell.

  30. Get rid of it. by eikonos · · Score: 1

    Some areas don't use Daylight Savings Time and they seem to get along fine. Changing the time is more trouble than it's worth, so why don't we just get rid of it?

  31. What?!? by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Kids actually trick-or-treat instead of throwing sometimes-frozen eggs at people in Halloween?

    In my humble housing projects, kids do t||t, but I also see egg stains on the ground after every 'ween. I'd say more daylight is better, if only to stop the eggers that sometimes make me scared to leave the building.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  32. DST is BS anyway.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hae no idea why Congress thinks this thing will svae oil. Back when DST was invented, it was understandable. Now, we're different. Now we have people who work at any time during the span of 24 hours. We have 24 hour stores and there's more activity at night now then ever before. I bet that the existing DST does nothing to save oil now at this point. Sure, it's nice to have those extra daylight hours and what not but is it worth causing untold number of devices (regular desktops and servers will be fine, but it's the embedded stuff that is the problem now). Changing it now would not make a difference in oil usage.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:DST is BS anyway.... by st1d · · Score: 1

      You're right. I've read up on this a little, and when DST was first implemented (and the numbers are all over the place, so take these with a grain of salt), the savings were in the double digits, with some estimates as high as 25-30%. Today, we're not quite to 1%, for the reasons you mention as well as others.

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:DST is BS anyway.... by claygate · · Score: 1

      Except we will use a lot of oil manufacturing new goods to make up for all the embedded systems that now work off of incorrect calendars and need to be replaced.

    3. Re:DST is BS anyway.... by natedubbya · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Maybe you have the convenience of a job that lets you work whenever you want, but I assure you the majority of jobs are not like that. And even if people do have flexible jobs, a large chunk of them go to work in the morning based on when their kids leave for school. Since schools obviously change with DST, so will they.

    4. Re:DST is BS anyway.... by astrosmash · · Score: 1
      I bet that the existing DST does nothing to save oil now at this point. Sure, it's nice to have those extra daylight hours and what not but is it worth causing untold number of devices

      I like daylight savings time because the extra hour of sunlight in the evening makes me happy.

      But there's a very important question regarding DST and I'm perplexed that it's hardly ever asked, so I'll do that now:

      Why do we switch off DST in the winter, anyway?

      The time change in the fall is depressing because we lose an hour of evening sunlight, and it's aggravating in the spring because we lose an hour of sleep. Not to metion the hours I've lost debugging various database systems that fail to handle DST consistently (if at all).

      Wouldn't it be much more compelling if we eliminated daylight wasting time completely, rather than simply reduce it to three or four months, as congress is suggesting. What little benefit there is to switching off DST in the winter must surely be outweighed by what a complete pain in the ass it is to change our clocks twice a year.

      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    5. Re:DST is BS anyway.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do we switch off DST in the winter, anyway?

      I have the same thought every winter when sunset is happening at the depressingly early 5:15 PM. But then I realize that if we kept the clocks on summer time, sunrise wouldn't happen until 9:00 AM, which I think would be even worse.

      Besides, "11 noon" and "11 midnight" just don't have the same ring.

    6. Re:DST is BS anyway.... by james1177 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think the idea of having daylight saving time is a joke.

      All of the arguments for it are ridiculous. Some say it is for the farmers. My wife was the daughter of a farmer. Farmers started their days way before the sun rose and finished after the sun set. Having daylight meant nothing to the farmer. (Why do you think John Deer puts lights on their equipment?)

      For myself, growing up as a kid, I always stood on the bus stop before the sun came up. It made no difference to me if we were on DST.

      Twice during the year (and for at least a month) my sleep pattern is all screwed up because I have to change my clock. I am either waking way before I need to get up or dragging my butt out of bed feeling like I need another hour of sleep. And for what, Nothing! There are no more hours of daylight. We still have the same amount of time between dawn and dusk. Saying you have more time during the day is just plain ridiculous.

      DST is an out dated concept. It may have served a purpose at one time (doubtful), but now we need to just end it and move on.

      And that is all I have to say about that.

  33. Who is fooling who? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This whole thing is riduculous - pretty soon we will have daylight savings time year round, which will of course then be just "time". Might as well just stay on the same time, all the time. People work flextime now anyway - and most are not farmers that need to follow the schedule of the sun. If they do, just change what time they start work each day - not change the actual clock. If they are worried about commerce, people being in synch, etc. everyone across the globe should just agree on GMT (or whatever) as the standard time and go from there.

    The absurdity of fooling yourself by changing the clocks (not really unlike those that set their alarm clock fast so they are never late) reminds me of a former coworker, who came in later to work every day. One day he came in as we were leaving for lunch. Soon he came in on a Friday as we were all leaving for happy hour. Eventually he "lapped" himself and started coming in so late it was early the next morning, and eventually he came in at a normal start time of 8:00 or so. Of course, the trend continued and he just started coming in later again.

    1. Re:Who is fooling who? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      his cycle was just slightly longer than yours. i did this in college. with proper planning and a few hours of adjustment each week you can hit M/W/F classes on a 30 or 36 hour cycle, and you wouldnt believe how refreshing 12 hours of sleep every "night" can be.

    2. Re:Who is fooling who? by wk633 · · Score: 1

      I once had a neighbor who was always late with the rent. He blaimed his job, which payed every other Wednesday (as apposed to every other Friday).

      "And sometimes Wednesday is after the first of the month"

    3. Re:Who is fooling who? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      LOL you have to love spurious logic!

    4. Re:Who is fooling who? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who? Whom? It might help your career if you know the difference.
      http://www.ku.edu/~edit/whom.html
      Who refers to a subject, whom refers to an object.
      You should have said: "Who is fooling whom?"
      I offer this tip merely to help you advance your career, not to be a national socialist.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:Who is fooling who? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea, but you must of driven your poor roommate nuts!

    6. Re:Who is fooling who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might help YOUR career if you stopped being a grammer Nazi.

    7. Re:Who is fooling who? by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I've done that. (And often do it.) It has a ton of advantages. My favorite: my days are a few hours longer. Since I don't really need one or two hours more time per day on my own, I simply work 10-hour days. But that means I only need to work 4 days a week . . . instant permanent 3-day weekends!

      And the sleep is awesome.

      This all, of course, assumes you can get a job where you can get away with it. :P

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    8. Re:Who is fooling who? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      If they are worried about commerce, people being in synch, etc. everyone across the globe should just agree on GMT (or whatever) as the standard time and go from there.

      I used to work on traffic signaling systems and I had to manually change the time on the system twice a year. It was a real chore, coming in at 2 am to change everything over. People on 12 hour shifts either won or lost an hour in the process.

      Now I work on air traffic control software and everything runs on UTC. Its fantastic. I display 24 hour UTC on my workstation at home as well, which makes it easier to coordinate with people around the world.

      But I can't see the USA adopting UTC as a standard. It sounds a bit too Franch to me. Perhaps they will go for Freedom Time (tm).

    9. Re:Who is fooling who? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      No, UTC/GMT is actually British, so it's not evil like a French standard would be. But the USA still won't implement it, because the Brits are supposed to follow our standards, not vice-versa.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:Who is fooling who? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      No, UTC/GMT is actually British

      I had the impression that Universal Coordinated Time became UTC because of French pronounciation.

    11. Re:Who is fooling who? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      While technically not gramatically correct, the expression "Who is fooling who" falls under the category of common usage. Just google that expression and you'll see it used in a variety of sources.

    12. Re:Who is fooling who? by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing for a while in college. I had a job working late shift on week-ends, and so a couple of weeks into the semester, I sat down and devised a week consisting of 6 days averaging 28-hours each. Keeping to the schedule was a bit tougher than I imagined, though, because my body didn't always want to sleep as long as the schedule demanded and I'd sometimes need a mid-day siesta which would throw off my biological clock.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    13. Re:Who is fooling who? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Have you just stepped out of a time machine or something? Most English speakers stopped marking case on relative pronouns centuries ago, even in texts that are considered to be part of the canon of English literature. Almost the only time when 'whom' is appropriate today is as a deliberate archaism. I strongly suggest not using it as part of a strategy for career advancement. Among other things it will make your speech and writing seem affected and pretentious and may even give your boss feelings of inadequacy.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    14. Re:Who is fooling who? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      my boss has me check his writing for mistakes... even though it is not my job at all. and i was taught the word 'whom' in english classes within the past 5 years... so i don't think it is a dead word... but go ahead and justify mental laziness if you want.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  34. Time = Important by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Timekeeping is one of those basic things that need to be put down, standardized, and kept that way. Forever. It's like latitude and longitude, they don't change it in Country X just to make their numbers look prettier, because it needs to be consistent all over Earth. No DST at all, and everyone using the 24-hour clock would be the best way to go around this.

    1. Re:Time = Important by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure this has already been identified as an issue and that anything which needs to use time for anything important uses GMT.

    2. Re:Time = Important by sourcery · · Score: 1
      I'm fairly sure this has already been identified as an issue and that anything which needs to use time for anything important uses GMT.

      Use GMT for the important stuff? Man, that's so 19th Century! Why not use UTC instead--after all, the official definition of civil time has been based on Universal Time since 1928 (replacing the term GMT,) and on Coordinated Universal Time since 1972 (which is not at all the same thing as Mean Solar Time, regardless of the meridian one uses.)

      --
      Cthulhu for President! Why settle for the lesser evil?
  35. We all will die by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    I guess all those systems which have irreversibly tied themselves to the current daylight savings schedule and use calculations dependant on that for all their vital functions will be stuffed.

    A nationwide search should be commissioned to find this device and a highly paid team of specialists should be on hand to go in and perform the vital emergency electronic surgery which would be required to save it.

  36. It won't really matter, except by MikeLip · · Score: 1

    I would think that it would take the Evil Empire about 30 seconds to distribute a patch for Windows, and I'm sure the Linux community could do it even faster and more stably. And the doom predicted by people who think that their children will all disappear due to the sudden rise in boogeymen will no doubt be disappointed. What will really torque my nut are my watches - they mostly all "know" when DST starts, and they will all be hosed!

    1. Re:It won't really matter, except by st1d · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>would think that it would take the Evil Empire about 30 seconds to distribute a patch for Windows,

      Hey, here's a new conspiracy theory! Maybe this is all a scheme by MS. They'll patch it, but only for Windows 2003 and newer systems, in an attempt to force everyone to upgrade. Pure brilliance, I say!

      (Why not, they seem to think people will upgrade for IE7.)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  37. Think of the Children... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Upton noted that the extension means daylight-saving time will continue through Halloween, adding to safety. "Kids across the nation will soon rejoice," said Upton, because they'll have another hour of daylight trick-or-treating.

    This is the silliest reason I've ever heard of. Energy consumption I can understand if the facts support that it will really make a difference.

    Here in northern Michigan for our family at least we always wait for it to get dark before we go out. Maybe it's like having snow for Christmas, but it's doesn't seem like Halloween would be the same when you can see just how cheap all the costumes and decorations really are.

    Also how would this affect livestock? How do they know what time it is? If daylight savings time is so great, why revert at all why not just move it forward the whole year and let Indiana print their own TV Guides. :)

    1. Re:Think of the Children... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      but it's doesn't seem like Halloween would be the same when you can see just how cheap all the costumes and decorations really ar

      Not many people let their kids do much trick or treating anyway. All this paranoid soccer mom hysteria about poisen and razorblades (although all the cases of such were actually parents doing this to their own children, go figure). Oh, and if you do the math, more kids were kidnapped per capita in the 70s than today, by a large margin.

      Now days, most moms and dads dress their kids all alike, in costumes that do not represent devils or witches or other sinful things, and they go to the community center for apple bobbing and fellowship, so they will be protected and not corrupted.

      Its like communism, but everyone isn't broke. Makes me wanna barf. Modern parents can be such pussies, and of course, raising a whole generation of little pussies as well, afraid to go out, get dirty, light a firecracker, pick up a frog, etc. I am pretty sure the whole DST change ain't gonna change that.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Think of the Children... by fermion · · Score: 1
      I expect the change will endanger children, particularly those in primary school. Many of these children walk to school, alone or with parents. By pushing the time up in march, one makes the walking to school time, 7-7:30, dark, particularly in the north. Instead of sunrise before 6:30, one would expect sunrise after 7:00 for the first half of the month. The same is true for the last half of october.

      In the south, the situation is actually worse. Perhas the sun won't rise until after 7:30 for much of each month. Of course, the early sunset affects nothing as mosts kids are home soon after 3:00, or 4 at the latest.

      It is clearly not a good thing to have children walking to school in the dark. But perhaps a few months of additional dange is worth a single hour of additional fun.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Think of the Children... by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      In Northern Michigan, Halloween is a BIG holiday. The streets are literally jammed with kids and the firetrucks roam the streets tossing out candy. Northern Michigan is not as paranoid as the rest of the country and does not really subscribe to the "culture of fear".

      Also, the local newscasts do not start with someone shouting, "You are all going to die, stay tuned and we will tell you how to increase your chances of survival."

    4. Re:Think of the Children... by aethera · · Score: 1

      >>Its like communism, but everyone isn't broke
      Yet.

    5. Re:Think of the Children... by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      The change to Halloween is the worst aspect of this, for me. I've always reckoned on DST ending just in time for Halloween, and it's been nice to know that the "witching hour" falls when it's supposed to (well, within the margin of error created by time zones). Now, it'll really be 11 p.m. What fun is that?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  38. Boycott! by wviperw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe we should start boycotting all /. dupes in an effort to bring attention to this pressing matter.

    Err... wait.

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
    1. Re:Boycott! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It isn't a dupe - it is simply a continuation of the same thread after the time shift.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  39. As long as we're making changes by ArmorFiend · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As long as we're making arbitrary changes that are going to **** over the system right good, I think we should make William Saphire happy and stop supporting the penny. Minting pennies costs a lot of money, and after all these years inflation has made them more trouble than they're worth. Worse than worthless, really, as handling them is a burden on cash-handling facilities like banks and stores.

    We should just round to the nearest nickel, as we currently do with half-cents.

    That's my 2cents.

    1. Re:As long as we're making changes by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      That's my 2cents.

      Correction. That's your 5 cents.

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    2. Re:As long as we're making changes by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      "That's my 2cents"

      don't you mean, that's my nickel?

    3. Re:As long as we're making changes by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1
      That's my 2cents.


      Wouldn't that be 5 cents then? ;P
      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    4. Re:As long as we're making changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction rounding down that means his comment is worthless.

    5. Re:As long as we're making changes by Coryoth · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Minting pennies costs a lot of money, and after all these years inflation has made them more trouble than they're worth. Worse than worthless, really, as handling them is a burden on cash-handling facilities like banks and stores.

      We should just round to the nearest nickel, as we currently do with half-cents.


      New Zealand did this quite some time ago. It has caused very few issues, and has greatly reduced the amount of useless change people carry around. It would definitely be a good idea if the US could ever get around to it. Then again, that would imply change, and we all know how averse the US is to actual change. You still use paper for your notes for god's sake.

      Jedidiah.

    6. Re:As long as we're making changes by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      If we're rounding off to the nearest nickel, doesn't that make your 2 cents worth $0.00 (adjusted for inflation)?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  40. Wrong way around by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? Start minting mills!

  41. US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The looming catastrophe in America is on the horizon yet the political powers in Washington refuse to acknowledge that the current American way of life is not sustainable and must be significantly downsized if there is any chance of avoiding a tremendous disaster caused by a massive energy shortage. Extending DST is one of the lamest attempts I have heard about to address the coming energy crisis. Meanwhile SUVs are being sold, subarbian McMansions are being raised at record rates and America's level of debt is at the highest level in its history.

    If there is something to draw out of the recent energy bill is that politicians at least know that shit is about to hit the fan in a big way and those who prepare themselves for what's coming will fare much better than those who don't.

    So what exactly is the cause of our impending doom? Peak oil, that's what. In other words the world is about to reach (possibly already has) the peak of sustainable oil production levels. Beyond this point we enter the right hand side of the gaussian curve of oil production. This subject has been beaten to death on various internet sites (just google for peak oil) so I won't repeat the reasons why a major adjustment is not avoidable. I'll just mention a few things one should do to make sure they are ready for the greatest emergency in American history:

    • Get out of debt. Make sure your mortage is paid asap and lock your rates now. When the peak oil fallout unfolds debt collectors will likely be armed.
    • Make sure you have a ready source of food. Befriend a farmer or get a job on a farm. Preferably a small self sustaining farm which is diversified in its production and does not rely totally on fossil fuel inputs. Organic farms are usually the closest to fitting the bill.
    • Live close to your work place. This is sort of obvious but may be very hard to do for most people. Public transit will keep going at least a bit longer than private vehicles.
    • Make sure you can make yourself useful after the oil crash. I doubt there will be very many positions for PR executives in the future, but this may actually benefit some geeks on slashdot as the need to fix all kinds of things and hack homegrown power supply systems (such as home made wind turbines) will be unprecedented. No more chucking old stuff on the curb once it develops a simple fault! The world will not be nearly as wasteful.
    • Make sure the area you live can survive without significant oil inputs. Arizona isn't likely to be habitable after the oil crash. If you happen to live there it may be prudent to move now especially if you happen to own a property there as those will become next to worthless once the price of fossil fuels becomes prohibitive.
    Anyway, the doomsday scenario may unfold involving wars, civil strife and famine or we may be able to gradually power down and switch to a more sustainable life style. One thing is certain though. It will not be business as usual in the coming years and a serious societal readjustment is coming and frankly, long overdue if you ask me.
    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:US is getting desperate by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sheesh.

      Ok, let's take as a given that Peak Oil has already passed, just for the sake of argument.

      All that this means is that crude oil pumped from the ground will continue to become more expensive. Not in great leaps and bounds, but at a relatively steady pace.

      As crude oil becomes more expensive, alternate fuels become relatively less expensive. Sooner rather than later we'll see both synthetic crude (from farm waste, of all things) and expanded hydrogen trade.

      In a hundred years, we won't be back to hand-working on farms. We'll have a bunch of telecommuters working the same networked jobs they all want to work now, and the same green revolution farms, only the tractors will use more electric motors and less internal combustion.

      Is Peak Oil going to give us change? Yes. It is going to cause a capitalist apocolypse? No, not really. We did rather well before gasoline, and we'll do farily well long after it's gone.

    2. Re:US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hydrogen is not an energy source. What are you going to tap into to replace the awesome amounts of energy we currently get from fossil fuels? Fission energy (ie. uranium) will peak just like oil. Natural gas has already peaked in North America. Coal will peak in a few decades, possibly sooner if we start liquefying it to make synthetic crude.

      Tar sands in Alberta require huge gas inputs making it barely worthwhile from the energy standpoint. The Energy Recovered to Energy Invested ratio for tar sands is only 1.5 (for comparison the Saudi light sweet crude has a ratio of 30). As far as shale oil goes the ratio is less than 1.0 making it an excercise in futility at best and a moronic waste of remaining energy at worst.

      Fusion power is nowhere near ready to replace our existing reserves and it remains a high risk venture. Cold Fusion hasn't happen and most likely won't while Hot Fusion is yet to yield a positive Energy Recovered to Energy Invested ratio. In other words Fusion Power currently consumes more energy than it generates.

      We're good. But we're not THAT good. Yet. There is a very good chance we will have a long and significant readjustment period that will be very hard on ravenous oil consumers such as the USA.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    3. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! I can't wait until Penn&Teller do a show on this BS!

    4. Re:US is getting desperate by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      The looming catastrophe in America is on the horizon yet the political powers in Washington refuse to acknowledge that the current American way of life is not sustainable and must be significantly downsized if there is any chance of avoiding a tremendous disaster caused by a massive energy shortage.

      Not only that, but there is a looming environmental disaster caused by massive CO2 output, and the US refuses to do anything because it would hurt their economy.
      Apparently the US government, unlike the rest of the planet, still believes that a growing economy is more important than a surviving planet.
      This does not bode well for the future...

    5. Re:US is getting desperate by jareds · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fission energy (ie. uranium) will peak just like oil.

      What's the timeframe for that if fast breeder reactors are used?

    6. Re:US is getting desperate by Buelldozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is literally HUNDREDS of years of coal AND natural gas in the ground not 150 miles from where I am sitting.

      Natural Gas production in the US has NOT peaked and NEITHER has coal production.

      We have options, messy ones maybe, but we do have them.

    7. Re:US is getting desperate by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What are you going to tap into to replace the awesome amounts of energy we currently get from fossil fuels?

      Just about anything. Or, rather, EVERYTHING. In 100,000 years we'll be using a lot of "fuel crops", but for the next thousand or so we can keep on digging into the earth for ancient hydrocarbons.

      And, of course, the whole "Peak Oil" idea theorum requires crude oil to really be biological and not geological in origin. While most take it as such, it's not totally proven just yet.

      There is a very good chance we will have a long and significant readjustment period that will be very hard on ravenous oil consumers such as the USA.

      I don't think "hard" is the right word for it. Americans are historically very adaptable -- I would be surprised if even a total elimination of crude oil caught the US on a disadvatageous situation.

    8. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you really want to bait then at least point out something true. Let's say, just for argument sake that a couple more weeks of DST saves a substantial amount of fuel, what is the arguement against that? Anyone have one? Regardless of the size of houses that people are buying and building or the types of cars that they drive (at least in those cases, they pay for what the consume) isn't this a good idea? The alternative would be to change society and move the start time of day for a period of time, is that going to happen?


      Here is the state of things. Those for big business dismiss the fuel crisis, global warming, etc.. And they have legitimate reason to be skeptical because the science is weak even though the scientists tend to agree on it. Those on the other side, they are against big business and don't really give a fuck about energy saving measures so much as they are out to screw the energy companies; any alternatives that are suggested will be debunked by them so long as larger companies continue to exist and take part. Even hydrogen will be opposed by them simply because it will only be practical when Exxon and company manufacture it and ship it. Just watch how fast biodiesel will go out of vogue when one of the big boys get's involved or they realize just how big the major agricultural companies are.

    9. Re:US is getting desperate by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      he did not say hydrogen was an energy source. he said we would see hydrogen trade. stop frothing at the mouth for a second to actually read the response.

      fine. you have your soapbox and are screaming from the top of the hill. its just that the rest of us know it wont be so dramatic as you are prohesizing. it never is.

    10. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that this means is that crude oil pumped from the ground will continue to become more expensive. Not in great leaps and bounds, but at a relatively steady pace.

      Sure, so long as you don't consider a 50% rise each and every year as "great leaps and bounds." We'll be at $100/bbl before the close of 2006 and $150/bbl by the close of 2007. And we still won't be effectivly using any form of alternative energy, despite what the apologists say.

    11. Re:US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 1
      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    12. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he did not say hydrogen was an energy source. he said we would see hydrogen trade. stop frothing at the mouth for a second to actually read the response.

      Yes, asshat, but it follows that if hydrogen is not an energy source, it would be stupid trade it. You are better off trading the raw energy source..

      The advantage of hydrogen is that in an end use case it can reduce emissions, it is not a practical medium for energy trade.

    13. Re:US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 1

      I like how people pull numbers of of their collective asses. What exactly are you going to dig up for a thousand years given the current energy demand and the proven reserves of oil, natural gas and coal.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    14. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to put your tin foil hat back on.

    15. Re:US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is only a couple of decades before uranium peaks if we start replacing oil with it (in whatever form). Breeder reactors would double that time frame. However, the energy required to build and operate those nuclear stations can't be ignored and may shave quite a bit off that timeframe.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    16. Re:US is getting desperate by raile · · Score: 1

      Um, care to cite some other evidence (i.e. more than just one person -- the CEO of Exxon)? How is a corporate CEO an expert on this exactly? Bill Gates once famously said that 640KB was enough for anybody. How true that was.

    17. Re:US is getting desperate by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Despite your predictions of doom and gloom, I don't forsee the likes of FedEx folding any time soon.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    18. Re:US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 1
      You clearly exhibit the first of the four stages of grief caused by a loss: Denial, Depression, Anger and Acceptance.

      Just like the vast majority of Americans you've yet to accept the fact that fossil fuels are running short so you're in the denial stage.

      Personally I'm stage two myself and expect to be at stage three when the reality of it all starts to hit home ie. lineups at gas stations, intermittent power cuts etc. Acceptance is the last of the stages and I don't think many people will get to that point until the first three stages of grief are behind them.

      For now, please enjoy your denial as reality will dispel this very harshly for you.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    19. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, someone outside of the energy company saying this would be more credible... the energy companies stand to gain from a chicken little scenario where everyone thinks gas prices should be raised. Tell everyone it's peak time and prices are going up, and who will argue?

    20. Re:US is getting desperate by raile · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but I don't experience "loss" based on your ONE dubious reference. If the situation you fantasize about was true, you would have easily been able to reply with at LEAST one more reference, but as expected, all you have are insults and incredulity that people don't believe everything that a stranger on Slahsdot says without adequate proof.

      As for "fossil fuels", it's humorous to see how disbelief in your statement about natural gas translates into a disbelief about all fossil fuels. Whatever nerve I've touched apparently needs to have the tinfoil taken off of it to let it breathe.

    21. Re:US is getting desperate by MSBob · · Score: 1
      here. Just search google for a few minutes and you'll find lots of articles which state plainly that gas production in North America is passed its peak. LNG is becoming the buzzword of the month as the shortfalls in gas production must be replaced and soon. In fact there is an LNG terminal going up in my city and I live in Canada! That's right, Canada, the world's second largest Natural Gas producer is starting to build LNG plants. If that is not clear evidence that North American domestic gas production is in trouble then I don't know what is. Finally stop dishing out insults and then accusing me of doing likewise. Deep inside you know I'm onto something but your pride/denial/whatever triggers your ad-hominem attacks.

      I really don't care if you believe in peak oil. I do. I have a plan to deal with its consequences. If for some yet undiscovered reason it doesn't happen in my lifetime, that'll be just great! I won't have lost much. If it does however, then those who have done nothing to create a backup plan will have a tough time adjusting.

      Refusing to accept the facts of peak oil and gas production and sticking finger in your ears while shouting "I can't hear you" does nothing to address the problem. Get your head out of the sand and deal with reality lest reality will deal with you. But above all, stop shooting the messenger.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    22. Re:US is getting desperate by jackbird · · Score: 1
      it follows that if hydrogen is not an energy source, it would be stupid trade it.

      You mean like if you used an ocean current to generate power to make hydrogen, and then shipped the hydrogen inland or put it in a vehicle? Idiotic.

    23. Re:US is getting desperate by raile · · Score: 1
      LOL! Another source, from another "Peak Oil" doomsdayer website. Any articles not from the fringe that you are able to offer up? As for searching in Google, I decided to do just that and found plenty of evidence that disproves your statement. Care to argue with petroleum engineers? I'll take their word over a kook with a webpage and a cursory knowledge of HTML any day.

      P.S. Current production levels are not the same as resource availability. Learn the difference.

    24. Re:US is getting desperate by photon317 · · Score: 1


      Hydrogen is not a net energy source, it is merely a medium for storage and transportation of energy.

      I haven't heard of this farm-based synthetic crude, but if it works out anything like ethanol from corn has, it'll be a net energy loss.

      And while sure, alternate fuels will become *relatively* less expensive as oil skyrockets, that doesn't make them any more viable.

      Without something revolutionary, like the sudden development of viable net-gain fusion reactors all over the world, or some type of space-based solar, we're kinda screwed. When it costs more energy to get the oil out than the energy the oil provides, pumping the remaining oil becomes senseless.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    25. Re:US is getting desperate by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's five stages, they relate to how one deals with one's own death, and the correct order is: Anger, Denial, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance. Heavy stuff, as defined by Dr. Elizabeth Kubler-Ross.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    26. Re:US is getting desperate by Malc · · Score: 1

      I've telecommuted for over five years. It's not all it's cracked up to be. In the future we might not have a choice, but society will adapt to the personal problems it will introduce.

    27. Re:US is getting desperate by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      I live in Wyoming, there is more natural gas in the ground here then we can pump out.

      There are two reasons that we are "struggling" to get it out of the ground and to the market.

      First, there are a lot of environmental laws in the way. I'm not arguing for them or against them here, it's wayyy beyond the scope of this discussion. It will have to suffice to say that a lot of drilling and pumping is being blocked by environmental regulation.

      Second, we suffer from a lack of pipeline capacity to get it from the well heads to the hubs where it is sold. This one is being fixed as we speak, the state itself is backing a major pipeline project to address this transportation deficiency.

      We are NOT out of natural gas, nor will we be anytime soon. I don't care what the reports say because I talk directly to the exploration and drilling engineers...who convienently enough are located one floor down from me in my office building.

      Oil, and by extension refined gasoline, is a slightly different story. However I'd like to say that as the price of a barrel of oil comes up recovery methods that were once cost ineffective are now going to be used.

      We may well be past peak oil production but the progression from here will be linear and will not create sharp increases in price or decreases in production.

      Other energy sources, such as CBM (coal bed methane), Natural Gas and Coal itself are not at peak and they won't be for several hundred years.

      There is enough uranium in them thar hills to fire enough nuke plants to last from now until doomsday, we just need to find the national will to use it.

      The energy we need does exist and I strongly reject all the doomsday scenarios being tossed out by the chicken littles of the world.

    28. Re:US is getting desperate by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      I'm "on the ground" so to speak, living ATOP the facilities that pull this stuff (Coal, CBM, LNG, LP, and Ur) from the ground.

      We are NOT out of energy, not even close.

      We _may_ be at peak oil, but we HAVE other resources.

      So we run out of refined oil, gasoline, to drive our cars...big deal. We fire up Nuke plants to create hydrogen and we switch our automobiles over to that. Life moves on.

      If you think for one second that the governments, and people, of the world will let society entirely collapse due to a lack of Oil you are NUTS.

      As I said before, I strongly reject all of the chicken littles with their doomsday predictions.

    29. Re:US is getting desperate by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      If you think for one second that the governments, and people, of the world will let society entirely collapse due to a lack of Oil you are NUTS.

      You are, of course, correct. However, what scares me is the length that the US government is willing to go to compensate for the lack of oil. In West Virginia, coal companies are now happily decimating mountain tops. In Wyoming, oil companies are polluting the water table. Environmentalists have tried to protest this. However, it falls on deaf ears. The President surrounds himself with people that are paid to ignore the problems. I guess that stands to reason when he is also willing to invade countries, and let American soldiers die, so his interests can control the oil industry. I don't doubt that there are plenty of fossil-fuel reserves left. I just wonder what the cost of extracting them will be.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    30. Re:US is getting desperate by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of this farm-based synthetic crude, but if it works out anything like ethanol from corn has, it'll be a net energy loss.

      Remember that every ethanol projection you see treats the fuel-corn crop almost the same way as a food-corn crop. The effeciency leaps up if you allow for use of the whole plant, or even just generic "waste" biomass such as roadkill and fallen timber.

      Farm-waste crude has a similar gain--it's processed from essentially manure and a few other ingredients, meaning that ANY energy we gain from it is net: we've already paid for the creation of the manure.

    31. Re:US is getting desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would the peak be if we were to use Thorium reactors as well as modern breeder reactor designs?

  42. A solved problem by cmjensen · · Score: 1

    The last time daylight savings policy was changed nationwide, I was at UC Berkeley. Instead of merely changing the relatively-hard coded savings times, they converted to using the zoneinfo library where they can specify how daylight savings occurs, and which years use which rules for each timezone (so given a UTC time in 1974, the library can cough up the equivalent PST time that was correct for that year). OS X and Linux both appear to use the same library.

  43. Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by SirGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Specialized software like the power grid uses will be the issue. Most of this software will need large amounts of regression testing to ensure that the proper 23 and 25 hour days are handled.

    Many of the packages are expecting the 1st Saturday/Sunday in April to have 23 hours and the last Saturday/Sunday in October to have 25 hours.

    Do you really want the power grid to put into production a patch that hasn't been tested for many months ? ( Or do you want blackouts, or the cost to quadruple ? )

    1. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Specialized software like the power grid uses will be the issue. Most of this software will need large amounts of regression testing to ensure that the proper 23 and 25 hour days are handled. Many of the packages are expecting the 1st Saturday/Sunday in April to have 23 hours and the last Saturday/Sunday in October to have 25 hours. Do you really want the power grid to put into production a patch that hasn't been tested for many months ? ( Or do you want blackouts, or the cost to quadruple ? )

      Why would power plants even need to know what day it is, much less what time? They monitor load, line frequency and what not. Why should they care what time of day it is much less what day it is or even what year (poke at Y2K bug)?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      People tend to use more electricity when their awake. Things like lights are typically turned off at night. Televisions are turned off, and most electric cooking appliances. And most people don't use hair dryers when they sleep.

    3. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by aglerickson · · Score: 1

      Like Y2K (Zzzzz) everyone is going to have enough time to figure out how to adjust. And do you honestly think the power company isn't going to be excited about the extra revenue? They'll be ready to rake in the extra cash. Don't doubt it for even a second.

    4. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by SirGeek · · Score: 1
      Like Y2K (Zzzzz) everyone is going to have enough time to figure out how to adjust. And do you honestly think the power company isn't going to be excited about the extra revenue? They'll be ready to rake in the extra cash. Don't doubt it for even a second.

      There are many ISO ( Independant System Operators ) that manage the power grids in the US. They are not "power companies". CA ISO, Midwest ISO, ISO New England, PJM, and the Southwest Power Pool. One of the larger ones, CAISO, manages the power grid for California.

      There is ISO New England that manages the power for Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, MA, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. I know for a fact this company is a not-for profit. One of their mandates is to maintain the grid in a way that is cost effective to the end customers. They don't allow the power generators to rape the public. They monitor things VERY closely to ensure that no one is manipulating the market to make extra profit at the expense of the general consumers.

    5. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by aglerickson · · Score: 1

      That is good to hear. I'm sure those checks and balances are working now that Enron is under thumb. Which still leaves us with the local for-profits at the end of the line. They're still interested in keeping the current flowing so that the cash will continue to flow without interruption. Profit will still be the real motivation for the local power companies to be ready when the new law takes effect.

      As Qui-Gonn stated so aptly: Greed can be a powerful ally.

    6. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Gosh, then how come my electric bill is $400 a month during the summer?

      I realize it takes a lot more electricity to run A/C then heat, but it's a small house with two air conditioners. Billing people $400/mo to stay cool during the summer is ridiculous.

      Electricity is way too expensive. If it's not the power itself, it's "line fees" and "transmission fees" and don't forget any other fees they want to charge us this month.

      It might not be the power generators that are over charging; maybe it's the local companies (although Narraganset Electric is my only choice) but it doesn't matter. We get robbed.

      I wish they'd put up more nuclear plants.. so much more efficient, so much better on the environment. Did you know that an averag coal plant generates more radioactivity then the largest nuclear plants?

      Anyways..

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    7. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Why would power plants even need to know what day it is, much less what time? They monitor load, line frequency and what not. Why should they care what time of day it is much less what day it is or even what year (poke at Y2K bug)?

      Event logging and stored commands. All of this DST and time zone silliness can be avoided by using UTC.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    8. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most businesses that rely on time of day use UTC, especially if they communicate with systems in other timezones.

    9. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by Eivind · · Score: 1
      You "realize" it takes "a lot more" electricity to run A/C than heat ?

      Why, exactly, would that be ?

      The most efficient way of heating with electricity is to use a heat-pump. A heat-pump and a A/C unit is *exactly* the same thing, only one is working in reverse relative to the other.

      Cooling takes more than heating only if your house is so constructed that it's better at keeping heat in than at keeping it out. That may be the case, for example, if you've got large modern low-heatflow windows. Those let the sun in no problem, but let very little heat back out. (this is a good thing if you live somewhere where it's more often too cold than too hot)

      Given reasonable construction for the climate you're in there's not a single reason why cooling should require more than heating, assuming the temperature-differential you want to maintain is the same.

      In reality, mostly the temperature-differential is a lot smaller.

    10. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by SirGeek · · Score: 1
      Gosh, then how come my electric bill is $400 a month during the summer?

      Because the generators are for profit, there are not enough generators in your area so that they need to have the jet turbines online ( that raise the cost by 100 % or more per Megawatt Hour ) or you have inefficient means for the distribution of energy ( only 1 high voltage line into your area ).

      I realize it takes a lot more electricity to run A/C then heat, but it's a small house with two air conditioners. Billing people $400/mo to stay cool during the summer is ridiculous.

      Are the ACs energy efficient ? Are you cooling the house to 60 degrees ? Do you have 20 computers or an ancient electric stove, refridgerator, etc ?

      Electricity is way too expensive. If it's not the power itself, it's "line fees" and "transmission fees" and don't forget any other fees they want to charge us this month.

      Then pressure your govt to get more generation or more high voltage lines. There are HUGE groups complaining that there isn't enough power then they fight tooth and nail to prevent the lines from being put in because they don't want it in THEIR back yard.

      It might not be the power generators that are over charging; maybe it's the local companies (although Narraganset Electric is my only choice) but it doesn't matter. We get robbed.

      Try to get your city to put up a municicpal power plant. My wife and I pay 1/2 of what her sister's family uses just one city over ( with a for profit company generating the power ).

      I wish they'd put up more nuclear plants.. so much more efficient, so much better on the environment. Did you know that an averag coal plant generates more radioactivity then the largest nuclear plants?

      Quite possibly. However, Do you or your neighbors want a nuclear plant put up in your neighborhood ? Therein lies the problems...

    11. Re:Windows and Linux aren't the issue. by cbreaker · · Score: 1
      You "realize" it takes "a lot more" electricity to run A/C than heat ?

      Why, exactly, would that be ?

      Because I didn't fill in the blanks for you. I have gas heat, and it's pretty cheap to burn gas. The electric fans push the heated air into the house.

      The combined price of gas and electric during the winter is a fraction of the summertime - about 1/5 to 1/5 the price.

      The heat differential is much greater during the winter months. Speaking in fahrenheit, it's often 20 degrees outside - and we heat to about 70 degrees. That's a 50 degree difference. In the summer, we usually set the AC for 75 and it's normally 80 - 95 degrees outside. That's only a 20 degree difference.

      Perhaps we could replace the windows with super-duper two way heat exchange windows and install some space age insulation. The house was built in 1995 and it's got your normal construction found in houses around here.

      I don't know how the folks down south can afford it.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  44. More of an inconvenience to farmers than cows by rwade · · Score: 2, Informative

    An article from Colorado's legislature suggests that the primary complaint from farmers is that "most agricultural activities are based on daylight hours as opposed to clock hours, and crops and livestock maintain their schedules regardless of the time reflected on the clock."

    Because the farmers and their families would still have to work with their product during certain margins of the day to accomdate the plants, they would have to readjust their schedules to do non-farm things like shop for food, meet with a bank, etc.

    In the case of agribusiness, they would have to readjust the schedules of their employees.

  45. Fuck, my watch by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    I have a nifty solar watch that sets itself based on the the broadcast signals from the atomic clock in Boulder, CO. It automatically adjusted itself when DST started, and presumably would adjust when it was supposed to end. now it's going to be all fucked up? Wonderful. Fuck you Legislative branch.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Fuck, my watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine the broadcast signals from the atomic clock in Boulder, CO will start broadcasting the new, correct time.

    2. Re:Fuck, my watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well done dickhead. If it "sets itself based on the the broadcast signals from the atomic clock" then when they update the atomic clock your watch will magically be fixed again.

      think about it for a second.

    3. Re:Fuck, my watch by st1d · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you're lucky, maybe the new algorithm will make it run backwards. Then it will be a collector's item. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    4. Re:Fuck, my watch by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      As far as I knew it was hardcoded to set itself back an hour/forward an hour based on the date and as far as I knew the NST broadcast did/does not broadcast the time with a DST/nonDST time.

      One poster says that the DST/nonDST setting is broadcast as part of the signal. How do you know that my particular watch (the model I never gave) either uses or doesn't use that setting? Or even that it was broadcast at all?

      Way to fly off your handlebars just to flame.

      --

      Question everything

    5. Re:Fuck, my watch by sharkey · · Score: 1

      No, that just means you are getting close to the Dark Tower. Watch the skies for incoming sneetches.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  46. like boo hoo! by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

    All the more reason for Archer Daniels Midland to gobble up the last reniments of the small farmer. Their constant needs for subsides & this kind of nonsense is the last straw...

    1. Re:like boo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off troll. Most farms are owned by corporations, just like you are owned.

  47. Re:Not a big deal for *nix - Solaris by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    You're right. I already checked into Solaris. It is super configurable. You can define at what year DST begins and ends for any particular geographic region. And with flexible rules like "the third Sunday" and such. I have no question that Solaris will ride this out just fine with a patch.

    Of course, making sure all the systems are patched, and everyone has the time zone correctly defined to begin with... that is the greater challenge.

  48. Canada is intermixed with USA by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    One problem with *nix is that US and Canada time zones are intertwined. There are separate zones for Canada, but the Canada info is duplicated in the America folder for some idiotic reason. So if the time change goes ahead in the US, it will force people to fix the mess.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Canada is intermixed with USA by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      One problem with *nix is that US and Canada time zones are intertwined. There are separate zones for Canada, but the Canada info is duplicated in the America folder for some idiotic reason.

      "The America folder" is a directory for the Americas (North and South), not for the United States of America. The Olson database has an entry for, for example, America/Toronto; perhaps some OS vendors don't bother shipping the Canadian files as the differences are, at this point, historical, but if the bill gets signed into law, if Canada doesn't adopt the change, those vendors will have to ship them.

  49. How is it good for ADM? by rwade · · Score: 1

    While it would make individual farming harder, agribusiness entities like ADM would have to change their employee's schedules. This would make working for them less desirable, which in turn would raise wages, all other things equal.

    On the other hand, if ADM had enough control over their workers -- by merit of their employee's lack of control over their own situations -- then they could make the employees just take the situation and deal with their new schedules.

    1. Re:How is it good for ADM? by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1
      Dont they just import slaves to work the farms? I know they call it something more progressive like "day laborer" or someother nonsense like that, but honestly how many 'Americans' work the fields in America?

      Either way I dont think the field people are in much position to debate what ADM would have to say, and earning their $350 a week, before expenses afterall, they are not exactly going out and buying disposable goods at Wallmart.

  50. Conspiracy Theories by Legendof_Pedro · · Score: 1

    Now I could be wrong, but this seems alot like a conspiracy theory.

    Yes, that must be it. Make us work longer, make us not notice global warning, lighter days and such...
    Or something...


    Well, maybe not. But it certainly won't make people work longer hours; I think someone else has already said it, but I agree with them - people these days are prepared to work any hours. If people want to work extra hours, they will.
    I admit I've pulled a few all-nighters, trying to get that last piece of C++ to compile bug-free for tomorrow's deadline. Ah, these are the best days of my life.

  51. For the love of God, people... by HEMI426 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Daylight Saving Time, not Daylight Savings Time.

    1. Re:For the love of God, people... by st1d · · Score: 1

      Darn, and I was hoping to earn a little interest out of the situation. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    2. Re:For the love of God, people... by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you bothered to point this out. Were you confused by the word "Savings"? Did you mistake it for something else, so you felt like pointing this out to everyone? It seemed like most everyone else understood what was being discussed.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    3. Re:For the love of God, people... by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

      Why not? People keep saying it wrong. Very few people say (or type) it correctly. Why did you bother responding if my initial post wasn't that big of a deal?

    4. Re:For the love of God, people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dictionary says different

    5. Re:For the love of God, people... by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not even Daylight Saving Time. It's Daylight-Saving Time. If you correct people and get modded Informative, at least get it right!

    6. Re:For the love of God, people... by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

      No, it's not Daylight-Saving Time. Nothing I've found online seems to indicate that Daylight-Saving time is the correct name for DST. Also, none of the dictionaries I've looked at (including m-w.com and others) state that "Daylight Savings Time" is valid. Next?

    7. Re:For the love of God, people... by ksemlerK · · Score: 1, Troll

      1. He is an anal retentive asshole, pay no attention to his rantings. It matters little to anyone besides you and few other people.

      2. This is Slashdot. Anal retentive assholes are expected. Virtually everyone attempts to "Out nerd" everybody else. People who engage in this activity need thier asses kicked. It matters little to anyone besides you and few other people what goes on in this forum.

    8. Re:For the love of God, people... by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      I am wondering whether it's already time to start considering you a stubborn moron.

      The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

    9. Re:For the love of God, people... by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one slinging personal insults...I guess that's the refuge for people that don't like what they're seeing and can't just admit they're wrong.

      M-W's opinion on the matter...

      A few smaller dictionaries do have it printed your way, but they are the vast minority. I've never seen it "in the wild" spelled the way you think is correct...But hey, whatever fucks your fingers...Or something.

      Nothing in the first several pages of a google search for "Daylight Saving Time" (or even "Daylight-Saving Time") mentions anything about "Daylight-Saving Time" as an alternate spelling.

    10. Re:For the love of God, people... by westneat · · Score: 1

      According to the article, it's daylight-saving time so the AP style guide at least considers it to be an alternative. This debate is sort of retarded because no matter how you spell it, it will get the intended point accross. Additionally, while this is purely ancedotal evidence, most of the people I know say daylight savings time. I probably live in a colony of morons though.

    11. Re:For the love of God, people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's also pronounced "NEW-cle-ur" but that doesn't stop 'em...

      And as far as the "vernacular" goes, you're just barely right

      http://www.googlebattle.com/index.php?domain=%22da ylight+saving+time%22&domain2=%22daylight+savings+ time%22&submit=Go!

  52. Should not be a problem. by azatht · · Score: 2, Informative

    As long the operating system can handle both local time and Coordinated Universal Time, it should not be any problem. If the program saves every time in UTC, and when displayed, convert it to local time, the user should not need to be worried. As a European citizen we all have DST, and we manage easly, so why shouldn't those in the US manage too?

    --
    ------- In the end there are no begining
    1. Re:Should not be a problem. by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1

      If the program saves every time in UTC, and when displayed, convert it to local time, the user should not need to be worried.

      Actually, that's an existing problem in Windows. Any stored UTC date and time (file times, for instance) is converted to local time according to whether DST is currently in effect, not according to whether DST was in effect when the time was stored.

      Information from Windows would be more accurate if DST was abolished. (The linked article is four years old, but the problem is still there and Microsoft has stated "this behavior is by design"--meaning they're too lazy to fix it.)

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  53. Instead of tweaking it, they should fix it by BrettStah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.standardtime.com/proposal.shtml Check out the proposed replacement for daylight saving time, which also shrinks the number of timezones in the continental US from 4 to 2. It seems to make a lot more sense overall than what we have now...

  54. Of course! by rwade · · Score: 1

    And that's easy...

  55. Here in Hawaii... by Shag · · Score: 1

    It just means that I'll have a few more weeks each year of being woken up early by people calling from the mainland. Joy.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Here in Hawaii... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Less, actually. DST puts us one hour closer to your time zone, so that folks in New York only get up 5 hours before you instead of 6.

    2. Re:Here in Hawaii... by cdipierr · · Score: 1

      Nope. Hawaii is 5 hours behind when it's EST, 6 hours behind in EDT.

    3. Re:Here in Hawaii... by Shag · · Score: 1

      See, it's people like you who're waking me up! :)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  56. My gremlin! by cluening · · Score: 2, Funny

    But how will I find an update for my gremlin? Will I have to be careful not to feed him after 11 for a few weeks? It's all so confusing!

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:My gremlin! by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      You mean your Magwai bear right? If he's a gremlin, you've already screwed up his feeding schedule.

    2. Re:My gremlin! by cluening · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, good point. I've just had so many bad experiences with these guys that I can't keep straight which is which. So many rules!

      --
      Posted from the wireless couch.
  57. Cautionary Tales by sourcery · · Score: 1
    1. UNIX/Linux/MacOS X:
      • The good news: Apps that use the zoneinfo files will work correctly--provided the Sysadmin updates them. The latest source is available from http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm (click on the FTP distribution link. The source files must then be compiled using the zic (zone information compiler) utility.
      • The bad news: If the app's not using the zoneinfo files (perhaps because the user's TZ environment variable is set to a POSIX time zone rule literal,) then all bets are off. POSIX TZ rule literals are evil.
    2. Windows: The current time zone rules are stored in the Windows Registry. Changing them requires either a Windows Update, or else using Regedit and doing it by hand. Unlike Unix, the Windows time zone definitions only represent the curret annual transition ruleset--past history is not supported. This means that Windows timestamps captured in the past will show local time based on the new rules (once they're updated,) regardless of the actual local time at the (Universal) point-in-time designated by the timestamp. The analogous situation holds for future points-in-time.
    3. Java: Analgogous situation to that of Windows (see above,) only worse due to the following serious design flaw in the standard Sun date/time classes: "Dates" are reprsented as to-the-millisecond timestamps that designate midnight of the intended date in a particular time zone. Now, what happens to the "date" when local time is reintrepted as being one hour earlier?
    --
    Cthulhu for President! Why settle for the lesser evil?
    1. Re:Cautionary Tales by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Windows timestamps captured in the past will show local time based on the new rules

      Actually, timestamps captured by Windows in the past will show weird behaviour when DST is involved no matter what.
      Try setting a filetime to a known value and looking at it after DST has started or ended.
      It does not look like Microsoft thinks of filetimes as important...

    2. Re:Cautionary Tales by sourcery · · Score: 1
      Actually, timestamps captured by Windows in the past will show weird behaviour when DST is involved no matter what.

      Sorry, that's not quite accurate. In the case of file timestamps ONLY, Windows always applies the currently-in-effect offset, so that when DST is in effect, the point-in-time that is properly designated as 2005-01-01T00:00:00 -8000 displays as 2005-01-01T01:00:00 -0700. But this bizarre behavior only applies to file timestamps.

      --
      Cthulhu for President! Why settle for the lesser evil?
  58. Can't Adjust everything by rwade · · Score: 1

    And somehow they'd have to figure out what to do about flights into and out of Arizona, a no-DST state. If that same passenger needs to fly to New York to catch that London flight, that Phoenix flight would have to be adjusted also.

    If that flight is adjusted, all the other folks flying to New York would have to adjust their schedules, potentially delaying or cancelling business meetings in the nation's fasted growing city.

    Sure, you can adjust airline schedules, but some people are going to feel an effect.

    1. Re:Can't Adjust everything by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Given Arizona is neither EST or EDT... I'd guess the folks in Phoenix will be PST. If you catch my drift.

    2. Re:Can't Adjust everything by rwade · · Score: 1

      Don't got no mod points, but that's a chuckler.

  59. what about a happy medium.. by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

    What if we just went ahead 30min and just stuck with it and never change the time again.

    1. Re:what about a happy medium.. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      That would not work. We are that much ahead because of the irregular shape of timezones, but still we get an hour extra DST.

  60. Re:F***, my watch by tcgroat · · Score: 1

    No, your watch will be just fine. The DST/non-DST status is encoded in the WWVB data stream. See the NIST web site for details.

  61. DLS != Apocalypse by australopith · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh, for heaven sake grow up folks. Living in a country (New Zealand) that has had day light savings for as long as I can remember, I can tell you that the worst that has happened is that I've forget to reset my alarm and slept in.

    It is a little hard getting up an hour early in summer but you can sleep in an hour come winter. I do have to change my watch, clocks, VCR etc. We Kiwis use this change-over to also change our smoke-alarm batteries.

    Both my Mac and Windows machines set themselves.

    Yes, it is harder on farmers (we are a rural nation), but the livestock survives the change just fine - no cows explode from not being milked for an hour.

    The extra hour of daylight in is much appreciated in summer - more time for sports and other outdoors activities (oh sorry I forgot where I was posting ;-)

    --
    Just a simple man trying to make his way in the universe, aye.
    1. Re:DLS != Apocalypse by jnewmano · · Score: 1

      I've got a feeling that you don't realize that the US has had daylight savings time for a very long time. If you would have read the article you would have realized that they are proposing when daylight savings time is in effect and not.

      Then again, you could have picked this up from all of the other posts that mentioned this.

    2. Re:DLS != Apocalypse by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      There is no extra hour of daylight, you know. All DST does is take it off one end of the day and stick in on the other. I mean, I don't want to belabor the obvious, but people talk about DST like it was some kind of magic. There's no extra hour, and whatever you "gain", you have to pay for it somewhere else. Personally, I fail to see any advantage. If some people want to change their schedules for the summer, why don't they just do so, instead of screwing with everyone's clocks? Then the "extra hour" crowd would be satisfied, without having to impose their lunacy on the rest of us.

      We've had DST in the U.S.A. for decades (you probably got it from us), and it's always sucked. But at least we were getting to the point where anything with a clock (that included the date) was smart enough to update itself... until now. Now, most of that effort will be wasted. Worse than that -- if you want the right time on your VCR, you'll have to manually move it one way on the new changeover day (just like in the bad old days), and THEN manually move it back the other way on the old changeover day to compensate for its hardwired DST adjustment! Mac, Windows, and Linux can update themselves, and need not be affected (though some systems will be anyway); but embedded devices are screwed.

      BTW, they tell us that rubbish about smoke detectors here, too. It's a nice gimmick to sell more batteries. Me, I change the batteries when the detectors start beeping their "low battery" beep at me -- which can take two years or more.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  62. Scrap DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know i've been thinking.. if people understood that we get longer days in summer and shorter ones toward winter because the earth's axis of rotation is tilted, then maybe we could just do away with DST altogether and just have different working hours for the March-November months.

  63. Other countries and DST by benhocking · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, the countries of the world that do change their clocks don't change their clocks at the same time. The EU starts DST on the last Sunday of March whereas we (currently) start ours on the first Sunday of April. Currently, we both end ours on the last Sunday of October.

    If we're going to change how we handle DST, I'd recommend that we match the EU. I know that the idea of following the EU's lead is anathema to many of us, but hey, it's a small sacrifice and shows that we're willing to make compromises every so often.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Other countries and DST by jrockway · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why should we change? They're the ones who suck. :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Other countries and DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, only in your dreams will you ever get blown by a French hottie.

    3. Re:Other countries and DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      French hottie

      now there is an only moron. Fucking frogs.

    4. Re:Other countries and DST by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that there is a whole other hemisphere who are in winter when the US is in Summer. Doing business with Australia, Africa, South America (and antarctica I guess :P) means that regardless of synchronisation with the EU, you are still gonna have to juggle stuff

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    5. Re:Other countries and DST by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1

      Flamebait?! Didn't anyone see OfficeSpace? The above reply is on-topic AND insightful.

    6. Re:Other countries and DST by erunaheru · · Score: 1

      An only moron?

    7. Re:Other countries and DST by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, the countries of the world that do change their clocks don't change their clocks at the same time.

      It gets even better - In Australia, some states don't observe DST at all, and of those that do, not all of them start and end it on the same dates (Yes Tasmania, I'm looking at you). Making things more interesting is that the Northern Territory and South Australia are only 30 minutes different from their eastern neighbors (but only SA observes DST), so for part of the year Adelaide is 30 minutes behind Brisbane, and for the remainder it's 30 minutes ahead since Queensland doesn't observe DST. That's fun to deal with when you're working with an airline check-in system where the host has to be able to determine what time it is at any arbitrary airport in the country. On the positive side, I've got that code written and debugged now, so to Congress all I have to say is "bring it on"! :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:Other countries and DST by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I almost forgot - Australia will be changing the DST dates for 2006 to accommodate the Commonwealth Games, rather like they did in 2000 for the Olympics. Sheesh.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  64. If you want to read about the studies... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    then check "nature reviews - neuroscience" nr. 6 from may this year. on page 399 there's a great article about the problem of disrupted sleep patterns and their causes. with bad sleep patterns you have a high risk of cancer, a smaller brain volume, stress, neuroses, death on birth (of your child) anging, heart infact, and much more. and you have a 28% weaker immune system. i would say that there is no better way to stay healthy than good and enough sleep in the right rhythms.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  65. Benefits FAR OUTWEIGH Costs by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

    "The beauty of daylight-saving time is that it just makes everyone feel sunnier," said Reps. Edward Markey, D-Massachusetts

    1. Re:Benefits FAR OUTWEIGH Costs by web_boyo_in_sac · · Score: 1

      really?

      it's always made me a pissed off SoB when I get used to waking up at 8 and I'm forced to wake up at what was 7 just because someone thinks my lamp uses more power when it's on an hour longer.

      DST is a rancid bandaid for a large scope problem, and changing DST is like pissing on that bandaid expecting it not to fester.

  66. Please, do away with DST entirely! by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    Let's start a campaign to do away with daylight savings time entirely. It serves no purpose. If people want to get up later or earlier then they can do that. Setting clocks ahead and back is silly.

    Will anyone listen?

    1. Re:Please, do away with DST entirely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Queensland, Australia, we don't have any daylight saving nonsense anymore. and thank goodness for that!

  67. routers, kerberos, and the resulting shitstorm by jgaynor · · Score: 1

    This is not a trivial issue. Observe . . .

    Cisco devices, both IOS and CatOS based, use the 'summertime' command to compensate for daylight saving time (example). This means that a change in the DST setup would force you to upgrade code. For organizations with thousands of devices, this is less than easy.

    Why upgrade to avoid an annoyance you ask? Because it's way more than an annoyance. Many cisco installations use kerberos to authenticate user logins (not just for management sessions, some RAS as well). Kerberos uses synchronized timestamps as a pre-qualifier for authentication, allowing for a clock drift of five minutes before denial. Without an IOS/CatOS upgrade The offset caused by this change would lock any and all Cisco administrators out of their network devices until someone could either remotely disable AAA via SNMP or worst case, locally knock the device off of the network to force a password-fallback (if thats not denied out of paranoia already).

    Won't someone please think of the network engineers?

    1. Re:routers, kerberos, and the resulting shitstorm by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cisco devices, both IOS and CatOS based, use the 'summertime' command to compensate for daylight saving time (example [cisco.com]). This means that a change in the DST setup would force you to upgrade code.

      Or at least it would force you to study the command reference a bit better, and find the second optional form of the command that allows you to specify the beginning and end of summertime.

      That would mean you require only a configuration change, and not a code upgrade.
      But of course you would need to read the manual...

    2. Re:routers, kerberos, and the resulting shitstorm by randyest · · Score: 1

      Wow. Yes, it even says that in the link the grandparent poster included in his melodramatic "This is not a trivial issue. Observe . . . " hilarity.

      Won't someone think of R'ing TFM? :) lol

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:routers, kerberos, and the resulting shitstorm by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Besides that, I would guess that the Kerberos system uses the UTC time, not the local time, as a reference and thus is not affected by DST. But I have not verified that.

    4. Re:routers, kerberos, and the resulting shitstorm by igb · · Score: 1

      Sure to God noone is doing authentication using
      something other than UTC? If you're using
      clock-on-the-wall time to do authentication,
      you're mad. You'll have a hideous window of
      vulnerability during the duplicate hour when
      the clocks go back, and tickets expiring
      suddenly when the clocks go forward. And
      that's before we ask how on earth you're
      handling the case of an authentication
      server handling requests from multiple time
      zones.

      Any computer that uses anything other than UTC
      to to anything other than display things
      cosmetically is losing. You should be storing
      a timezone-neutral format, you should be
      issuing tickets ditto. Before someone even nerdier
      about clocks than me jumps in, I can understand
      people who want to tick UT0 or UT1 --- astronomers
      --- where the offset from UTC is non-integer,
      and I if I were in a bad mood I could make a case
      for storing dates in applications in TAI, so
      that time arithmetic is correct over leap-seconds.

      ian

  68. Only one dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only one dupe?

    Let's see:

    1. April 07, 2005

    2. July 20, 2005

    and now

    3. July 24, 2005

    I think that's kind of excessive. I'm sure someone can find other dupes of this article, anyways.

  69. Um. Hello. by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

    Here's a novel idea...

    Quit fucking with it.

    --
    fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  70. This will be worse than Y2K by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this will inconvenience/hurt(?) more people than Y2K, right? Congress, you just created a "disaster" worse than Y2K, what are you going to do next?

  71. really by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    slow news week?

  72. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    Chill out. This is supposed to be a technical discussion, not an opportunity for you to spew your venom and vitriol.

  73. Permanent Solution by seven+of+five · · Score: 2, Funny

    I turned my clock back a half hour... I'll never need to change it.

  74. why just 60 minutes by stud9920 · · Score: 0

    I have never understood why the shift had to be exactly 60 minutes. What is there so magical about 60 minutes ? Can't some statistician work for five minutes with a cosine law specialist and compute exactly what would be the optimum time shift ?

    It's not like it would be much more confusing than what we have now, and besides, it only happens twice a year.

  75. I call BS by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    According to some senators, farmers complained that a two-month extension could adversely affect livestock,

    This is dumn. Since when can bessie tell time? Besides, I thought farmers got up with the sun, not the alarm clock.

    1. Re:I call BS by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      This is dumn. Since when can bessie tell time?

      Never been around cows? Bessie knows when it's time for her to be milked. And she'll let you know about it in no uncertain terms.

      Besides, I thought farmers got up with the sun, not the alarm clock.


      They do. And now they will have to readjust their schedules for off-farm activities (little things like sending their kids to school) that used to coordinate nicely with thinks like Bessie's milking time.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  76. Change the name too... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    While they're at it they should officially change the name to "Daylight Savings Time", since that's what everyone already calls it anyway.

  77. a nuisance, but not that hard by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    Australia had DST variations up to and including 2000 (for the Olympics in that instance).

    Lotus Domino has a setting called "DSTlaw" where you can put custom start and ends.

    Windows will need some kind of patch or update but that's not hard to do - we've had them in the past.

    Given that 2000 was a one-off and we'd be changing back the following year, some computers ended up with an additional timezone "Sydney (2000)".

    Don't know about other systems...

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  78. So-called "atomic" clocks by dereference · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have several of these, including a wrist-watch, and all of them are normally zero maintenance. As if you didn't know, these beasties listen for a NIST radio broadcast signal and synchronize themselves automatically.

    Well, the radio signal does not include DST information; that's a "client-side" feature of the clock itself. Most clocks allow you to configure which time zone offset you wish, as well as to specify whether you want the clock to observe DST during the appropriate time of the year.

    And therein lies the problem!

    I can't exactly "patch" my clocks/watches with an update to handle this absurdity. These aren't exactly field-upgradable. If this goes through, rather than being zero maintenance, each of these timepieces will need to be adjusted 4 times per year!

    (Yes--four--go count if you don't believe me: once to compensate for DST starting before the device thinks it should; again to un-compensate upon the traditional DST start; once more to compensate upon the traditional DST end; and finally yet again to un-compensate for the real end of DST.)

    So count me as one, I certainly care!

    1. Re:So-called "atomic" clocks by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      And all of this in the face of ZERO evidence that it will save oil. In fact, there's no guarantee folks won't use the extra daylight to drive to the local shopping mall in their 4 mpg SUV. Remember, image is everything. As long as these bozoids can LOOK like they are doing something, it doesn't matter what the consequences actually are.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    2. Re:So-called "atomic" clocks by J.Random+Hacker · · Score: 1

      Sorry -- that's just not right.

      The WWVB time code does have a DST flag that indicates whether DST is in effect. That is true of every radio time-code broadcast I know about (e.g. the Rugby clock in England, MSF).

      http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwvbtimecode.htm

      The DST setting on the clocks I have allows me to decide whether I want to display the time in DST or not.

      The folks who designed WWVB are not idiots -- they actually thought ahead when the protocol was designed. Don't forget that DST has been used, canceled, used, doubled, and used again. They knew the rules were likely to change, and the original target devices were electromechanical -- no chance for any fancy stuff.

      Check out the whole story -- It's good stuff.
      http://tf.nist.gov/stations/radioclocks.htm

    3. Re:So-called "atomic" clocks by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....to drive to the local shopping mall in their 4 mpg SUV....

      Actualy, the stated goal of these "boziods" is to save ELECTRICITY, not oil consumed by SUV's. To the extent electricity is generated from oil, the will be some small savings. Instead of always messing with the clocks, why not make DST permanent everywhere all year?. Start the schools one hour later if there is worry about kids being in the dark. I wonder if that thought has even occurred to any of these "bozoids"

      --
      All theory is gray
    4. Re:So-called "atomic" clocks by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'm going to consider it a good excuse to replace all my clocks. I have some of the first atomic clocks to hit the market and they're ugly as sin.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:So-called "atomic" clocks by toddbu · · Score: 1
      And all of this in the face of ZERO evidence that it will save oil.

      I remember watching David Brinkley many years ago saying that the last change in DST was driven by the barbecue industry. They figured that if they could extend "effective" daylight then more people would BBQ after work. Anyone checked up on the BBQ lobby recently to see how they feel about this change?

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    6. Re:So-called "atomic" clocks by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Saving enery is pretty much equivalent in one form or another.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  79. other devices? by darkain · · Score: 1

    everyone mentions OS's, and how they will handle. sure, they will handle easily, they can be patched, no problem.

    what about my digital watch that accounts for daylight savings? my console video game systems and games with built in real-time clocks? my microwave? my tv? my alarm clock? over the years, these devices have become more complex to handle both date and time, and will automatically adjust themselves for daylight saving when needbe.

    really, changing daylight saves will cause more problems then sollutions as far as i'm concerned.

  80. PCs are the easy job by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

    So, we change Daylight Savings time to conserve energy by... um... making time more magical, I guess. And you're concerned about PCs and operating systems that need patching?

    Come ON, now, those are just simple patches or, at worst, ROM flashing. Kid's stuff. Especially with auto-patching systems. Let's talk VCRs, TVs, microwaves, clock radios, watches, and any other common household appliances that keep track of time, auto-adjust for daylight savings, and don't have happy little USB ports, floppy drives, CD drives, or data ports to patch their firmware. Try patching those, then see if you're still willing to cry over your PC.

    Of course, the user's got it easy. They just have to put the upgrade in once it's available (if it's available). The programmer suddenly has an extra option they have to check for amidst anything that does time checking. Again, PCs are the easy case. Appliances and embedded systems, not so much. Show me the VCR and TV manufacturers who'd be willing to replace people's appliances for free once this goes through. That oughta be a riot.

    All I'm saying is, for all the productivity and time that'll be wasted on a purely psychological issue, this better be some REAL special magic they're gonna use to conserve energy.

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  81. Re:Reason #7,234 -- Daylight Savings Time Headache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have electricity in Hawaii now!?!?!

  82. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by salmonz · · Score: 1

    I see I get -1. Now that's truely American. Censor the people that are speak out on how dumb the US government is. I think I'm right on topic. I am discussing how the US affects the world and "Time" was just the starter.

  83. This works out great! by joshjoneswas · · Score: 1

    I can get a job now!

  84. Who will pay for.... by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 1

    all those faded drapes ?

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  85. Affords me better fitness by Fastball · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since I can have an extra hour of light at the end of the work day. That means I can get out on my bike and get some miles in before dark. And before you fuckers suggest that I go in to work an hour earlier, I must tell you that I cannot. I work in television, and programming doesn't shift with DST. If something airs at 3pm, it airs at 3pm.

    1. Re:Affords me better fitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ride in the morning, dolt.

    2. Re:Affords me better fitness by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      before you fuckers suggest that I go in to work an hour earlier
      Try getting a better job, one where you can take that extra hour off to go on a bike ride, or maybe buy some lights for your bike.

    3. Re:Affords me better fitness by HisMother · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If something airs at 3pm, then it most certainly [i]does[/i] shift with DST. If it didn't, then during DST, it'd air at 2pm.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    4. Re:Affords me better fitness by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      I live in Queensland, Australia. Not totally OT, but this is one of the main states in australia, but doesn't go to daylight savings with other states that are normally on the same time zone.

      The end result is that we have the sun rising at 4-30am, going down at 5-30pm, and the locals (I'm a recent addition there) see it as perfectly reasonable. Personally, time with a little sunshine in the evening is more useful than getting up at an unholy hour of the morning to "enjoy" the sunshine, as much as it is possible to so early in the day.

      The concept of doing "anything" that requires daylight after work seems lost on people who haven't lived where such things are seen as normal.

      Sigh. Damn banana benders.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    5. Re:Affords me better fitness by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Only a cyclist would say something like that... That's precisely the same reason I welcome their legislation. :-) I've always suspected that us cyclists are borderline insane in our dedication to our sport.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    6. Re:Affords me better fitness by mattdm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Queensland, Australia. Not totally OT, but this is one of the main states in australia, but doesn't go to daylight savings with other states that are normally on the same time zone.

      The end result is that we have the sun rising at 4-30am, going down at 5-30pm, and the locals (I'm a recent addition there) see it as perfectly reasonable. Personally, time with a little sunshine in the evening is more useful than getting up at an unholy hour of the morning to "enjoy" the sunshine, as much as it is possible to so early in the day.

      I'm not clear on your objection here; with Daylight Saving Time, you'd have sunlight from 5:30am to 6:30pm -- an additional evening hour.

      I'm currently in Boston, and I wish we'd go to DST year round (i.e., shift to being on Atlantic Time instead of Eastern Time). As it is, we have sunset at 4pm in the winter, and that pretty much sucks.

    7. Re:Affords me better fitness by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      sorry - we DON'T have daylight savings, hence possible evening activities don't happen, and frustration at the backwardness of the locals.

      Other bits of australia do, and we in queensland also could well benefit from year round daylight savings to get the sun rising close to when people wake up, and going down with some time for a barbecue on the back yard after work, or a game of football with the kids.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    8. Re:Affords me better fitness by guard952 · · Score: 1

      Go for a ride in the morning

    9. Re:Affords me better fitness by Fastball · · Score: 1

      How on earth was this post flamebait? If don't agree, fine. Tell me to get another job (:rolleyes:), but don't mod this flamebait for crying out loud.

    10. Re:Affords me better fitness by zenneth · · Score: 1

      I work in television, and programming doesn't shift with DST. If something airs at 3pm, it airs at 3pm.

      I guess now we know what time Sesame Street is on.

      zing!

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    11. Re:Affords me better fitness by Fastball · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, Zoom is on at 3pm.

    12. Re:Affords me better fitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod abuse. My post is factually correct and an innocent attempt at humor.

  86. Children will rejoice???? by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

    I agree. What kid EVER wants to trick or treat when it's LIGHT out? That's nuts! Kids would hate it because their parents wouldn't let them go out for another hour, instead of just after dinner, and they wouldn't get to stay out any later because of school hours not shifting.

    More bureaucratic hot air, I say.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  87. Crap, I'm pissed. by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    I just bought *two* $80 Honeywell programmable thermostats that are hardwired to keep track of the date/year and automatically adjust for daylight savings time according to the current DST rules. It would suck ass if they rendered the damn things obsolete with the stroke of a pen.

    1. Re:Crap, I'm pissed. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Does it have an USB port so you can flash the ROM?

      if not, you just wasted $80.
      +++
      http://www.drudgereport.com for the truth.
      +++
      My new Home

    2. Re:Crap, I'm pissed. by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      Turn of daylight savings and run them according to UTC.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
  88. UTC by Danathar · · Score: 1

    It would be SO much easier if EVERYBODY was on UTC. The "inconvienience" of figuring out when you should go to bed is worth the sacrafice.

    1. Re:UTC by slappyjack · · Score: 2

      AMEN TO THAT, Seriously.

      Who the fuck cares if youo get up at 0700 EST or 1500 Zulu? Its exactly the same damn time. My mother wouldnt have to do timezonemath every time she tried to figure out when to call me.

      Want extra daylight hours of business? Open an hour later and stay open an hour longer, stupido.

      Don't even get me going on the fucking 12 hour/24 hour clocks. 24 hour makes sense, but your average 'merikan thinks of it like is the "mindbendingly complex metric system."

    2. Re:UTC by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Funny how my score went down on my post...

      The idea of time as something that people can agree upon works so that people can agree when to meet...ect...

      The current system was designed when people did'nt leave their locality. With people traveling multiple time zones and communicating over multiple time zones having a universal time that everybody all over the planet can agree upon only makes sense.

    3. Re:UTC by slappyjack · · Score: 1

      Yeah. What He Said.

    4. Re:UTC by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      My mother wouldnt have to do timezonemath every time she tried to figure out when to call me.


      She'd still have to figure out your schedule. Under UTC, I'd get home from work at midnight. If I wanted to talk with someone in London, they'd probably be asleep and snoring loudly at that time, while I had 2-3 more hours of daylight. That's true whether we both said it was midnight, or if he said it was midnight and I said it was 6PM.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  89. I count two, but it is still absurd. by Dr.+Zed · · Score: 1
    to specify whether you want the clock to observe DST
    (Yes--four--go count if you don't believe me: once to compensate for DST starting before the device thinks it should; again to un-compensate upon the traditional DST start; once more to compensate upon the traditional DST end; and finally yet again to un-compensate for the real end of DST.)

    Turn off DST and you reduce this to twice a year.

    The thing that gets to me is how, whenever I read quotes about the reasons behind changing DST, they make it sound like we will have MORE hours of daylight. Everyone loves the idea of more daylight. If you want an extra hour of daylight, get up an hour earlier and go to sleep an hour earlier.

    If you want the sun to rise earlier and set later in the same day, you need to drink the congressional kool-aid.

    1. Re:I count two, but it is still absurd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone loves the idea of more daylight. If you want an extra hour of daylight, get up an hour earlier and go to sleep an hour earlier.

      But I want my extra hour after work.

    2. Re:I count two, but it is still absurd. by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Or move to the equator.

    3. Re:I count two, but it is still absurd. by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Then go to work an hour early.

  90. Sucks for my new watch with auto daylight savings by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 1

    I don't think my Citizen Eco-Drive has a way to update the firmware. **&$&*#&@^!

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  91. What's the problem by strider44 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you all know, but America isn't the only country in the world, and other countries have DST, including mine, Australia. All that happens is a message pops up saying "You have entered DST" and an hour is taken off, everything's automatic. I'm sure it'd take about ten seconds to copy similar settings for the US.

    1. Re:What's the problem by cornface · · Score: 1

      Uh...you realize that here in the good ol' USofA, our computers do exactly the same thing? Because, uh, we already have daylight saving time. The "problem" is that they are changing the period of time that it covers.

      While I'm sure most PC's will be fixed during the course of their normal updates, there are other devices that don't get regular software updates. The old phone system in the closet getting dusty, for example.

    2. Re:What's the problem by catacow · · Score: 1
      Uh...you realize that here in the good ol' USofA, our computers do exactly the same thing? Because, uh, we already have daylight saving time. The "problem" is that they are changing the period of time that it covers.
      Well do you realise that we here in Australia have also had changes to our daylight saving time? I remember it changed when Sydney had the Olympics. The world didn't end for us then, I'm sure it won't for you now either.
    3. Re:What's the problem by cornface · · Score: 1

      But how can you be SURE???

  92. Various thoughts on the article by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    One, it will really make a mess of our digital society creating a new type of Y2K problem.

    Kids will rejoice for another hour of daylight? Usually trick or treating is down at night. Even if we did have an extra hour of daylight, consider the fact that it's after the equinox, meaning it's not going to be light out after 7pm for sure.

    And like I said, it will really mess up our digital society. Back when they first did daylight savings time, we didn't have a computer society as we did now, so more than likely it was a minor inconvenience.

    If you don't want children walking to school or waiting for the bus in the dark, there is a simple solution. It's called moving the school day one or two hours ahead that time of year.

    And like others have said, employers can always stagger their employee's work days.

  93. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by iocat · · Score: 1
    It takes about three days to get used to DST, max. The sleep disruption is far smaller than you get from one day of "oh, look Seinfeld's on..."-sleeplessness.

    Give me a break.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  94. Zonk, King of Dupage by UziBeatle · · Score: 1


    It seems to me Zonk is deserving of some sort
    of medal or award or something for his continuing
    and unswerving spurious ability to dupe.

    His, is quite a talent indeed and I salute him. Even I, a somewhat brain damaged individual with a dubious memory subsystem, has noticed the amazing number of duplicate stories presented to us from the desktop of Zonk.

    I hearby nominate Zonk as King of Dupage. Who will second my motion?

    --
    Something between the lines jumps out and bites your arm off. Soltan Gris / London
    1. Re:Zonk, King of Dupage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean "dupe" your motion

      If you kept dupe stats and posted a dupe hall of fame top ten list into all the stories once a week, I'd support you. Unfortunately I can't support motions that meant merely as rhetorical devices.

  95. This could be good by imuffin · · Score: 2, Funny

    This could be good for our energy situation 'cuz that extra hour of sun each day will let us produce more corn, which we can turn into ethanol.

    --
    watch funny commercials

  96. From a great book about DST... by brj · · Score: 1
    From Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time:

    "If you drove the 35 miles from Steubenville, Ohio, to Moundsville, West Virginia, and wanted your watch to keep the local time, you would have to change it seven times on the route."

  97. Cross Border Issues by darkonc · · Score: 1
    Congress just dumped this idea on the world without bothering to discuss it with the people that it might effect -- Like Systems administrators and ... Canada.

    There are areas where there's a huge volume of commerce and communication. The first that I heard about this proposed change was this week, and it looks like that may be the same for most Canadian legislators.

    Time snafus can cause all sorts of problems, ranging from business meetings, manufacturing deliveries to ferry and aircraft schedules.

    By the time Canadian parliaments and legislatures get on the ball and decide whether or not to follow suit, it will probably be September/Octopber. Parliament is either now on summer vacation or about to go. There's really no tie to sneak in this legislation before fall.

    That could leave some people with about a month to reprogram their systems, switch schedules etc. etc.

    The last thing you would want would be to have your insulin dispenser double-dose you because the clock changed at the wrong time (this is going to be more of a problem with Windows based software than Unix based).

    It'll be interesting to se if Microsoft comes out with a zoneinfo patch for the millions of people still running '95, 98, NT and 2000.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  98. understanding the topic SNBAP by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    the US has DST too. we are not talking about just starting to use it. we have DST and manage easily as well, and have for many years. if you RTFA, you will see that we are talking about a CHANGE in DST, which will affect devices that have DST hard coded. you can now return to your regularly scheduled US bashing.

  99. As... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was walking down the street one day, a man came up to me and asked me what the time was that was on my watch,

    YEAH

    And I said:

    Does anybody really know what time it is
    Does anybody really care
    If so i can't imagine why
    We've all got time enough to cry ...
    (Title: Does Anybody Really Know What Time It is?, Artist: Chicago , Album: Chicago Transit) Authority)

    -- let politicians decide what time it is... good idea...

  100. PC's on UTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  101. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by cnettel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now, just take it easy. There is no international standard on DST, so there is nothing to break. The US + Canada hasn't been synchronous with (most of) Europe before, and they won't be now. Not to mention the countries with half hour zones and whatever.

    There may be quite valid reasons to dislike U.S. (foreign) policy, but this is really an internal issue. If the majority of the U.S. population suddenly decided to scrap any celebration of Christmas or any other somewhat coinciding or similar holiday, that would sure as hell affect export industries with some U.S. interest more. Just like Firefox gaining marketshare among U.S. users affect everyone, no matter where you're situated, who has been an "IE only" dumbass. You're not forced into anything. Not this time, at least.

  102. Re:Power Grid Software by grumio · · Score: 1

    Where I am (Australia), the main interconnected transmission grid just ignores daylight savings (and times zones for that matter) entirely. All transmission grid operations and generation disaptch are run to "Eastern Standard Time", which doesn't change during periods of daylight savings.

    In states or regions of the grid that don't use this particular time zone, the clock on the wall just doesn't agree with "system time". The operators get used to it pretty quickly.

  103. Why by tuxmaster · · Score: 0

    my only question is why change it whoat is the point. looks like the senate is just wasteing time.

    --
    ~tuxmaster
  104. DST or NOT, does not matter... by unclocked · · Score: 1

    If it's DST or NOT, it is not going to matter folks, employers will always want you to work 80 hours/week.

  105. Nothing is going on in his parents' basement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >Nah, only in your dreams will you ever get blown by a French hottie.

    I rather doubt he will pleasure himself with a human anytime soon.

    1. Re:Nothing is going on in his parents' basement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Fark, Batman!

  106. how about... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    we ignore this.

    sounds like a bad idea.

    switching to a universal standard, like GMT or something similiar seems to be the way to go.

    time is time, get over this crazy concept of time zones and the even more bizzare "DST".

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:how about... by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      GMT's a good thing for computers, a bad thing for humans. The whole idea of timezones in the first place is to put noon on the clock at roughly the same time as noon by the sun. DST is an annoyance because it shifts things around inconsistently without actually improving sync between clock and sun.

  107. Australia did it before by ozTravman · · Score: 1

    They brought the start of daylight savings forward in 2000 in Australia to give more daylight to the Olympics, I don't recall hearing of any problems.

    1. Re:Australia did it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      working in the IT industry during that time I can asure you that while it caused no major problems it did cause a shit load of issues. People arriving 1 hour early or 1 hour late to meetings, scheduling systems screwing up etc etc. the problem becomes not everyone makes the adjustment instantly and hence any system that didn't send time stamps as something like GMT based stamp went wrong. So no planes falling from the sky but plenty of inconvenience

  108. Fuck Daylights Savings Time, Lets Go UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Daylights Savings Time, Lets Go UTC!!

  109. Kids by TheLostStooge · · Score: 1

    The applications I will have the hardest time with are Kid 1.0 Kid 2.0 and Kid 3.0. They are currently running in production for 8, 5, and almost 4 years. There is no way during the school year I will be able to get them to init 0 at 8:30 PM anymore during the school year.

    --
    .adios/losers ~snake
    1. Re:Kids by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Who's the boss in your relationship with your kids?

    2. Re:Kids by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      You must not have kids... It's not a question of who's the boss, it just makes it very difficult to get the kids to bed when it is still daylight outside. They whine, and say "But I'm not tired." In my house, they still go to bed, it just takes a little more effort :)

  110. Re:Sucks for my new watch with auto daylight savin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your watch keeps track of what country / state you're in? When you travel, do you change a locale setting instead of just adjusting the time?

  111. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "Time is Time."

    No, it isn't. Local Solar Time (sundials) is not Mean Solar Time (GMT), and neither of which are Atomic Time (TAI). UTC itself is a mixture of the three.

    "You cannot change it."

    Now now, just because you can't set your VCR...

    "Countries like Canada may be forced to follow suit with the Americans because US tries to bulldog the the world conforming to their standards."

    Not all the world follows the same time zone. Not all the US follows the same time zone. Hawaii and Arizona don't observe Daylight Saving time, the former is in the tropics where it makes litle sense (the closer you are to the "Equator," the more "equal" the amount of daylight in a day throughout the year), and Arizona is just being petulant. Indiana can't even agree whether or not to observe DST statewide.

    Not even all the world follows the concept of dividing the world into integer time zones as the US does internally. Several of those oil-rich countries in the Middle East, the ones we apparently try the hardest to impose our will on, are a half-hour or even a quarter-hour off from their neighbors. And yet we still buy their oil just fine.

    Not all Canadian provinces can agree on Daylight Saving Time today. The Mexican state of Sonora doesn't observe DST, but that's mostly because they border Arizona (but even there it seems Phoenix has more international influence than Washington).

    Really, if we forced the rest of the world to conform to our "standards" (especially the ones we ourselves can't agree on), metric would be dead by now.

    "Come to think about it, I think the USA had the 9/11 attacks coming to them. "

    The terrorists can't stand our imperial DST ways? Can we say "tangent?"

  112. Thermal variability by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. Clocks, including electronic ones, are sensitive to temperature changes and the correction for mid-summer may be different than the correction for mid-winter.

    That effect might be minimal for a watch on an office worker, but an error of just one part in a million is 3 seconds/month.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  113. There is no S after Saving..... by bendsley · · Score: 1

    The official spelling is Daylight Saving Time, not Daylight SavingS Time.

    Saving is used here as a verbal adjective (a participle). It modifies time and tells us more about its nature; namely, that it is characterized by the activity of saving daylight. It is a saving daylight kind of time. Similar examples would be dog walking time or book reading time. Since saving is a verb describing a single type of activity, the form is singular.

    Nevertheless, many people feel the word savings (with an 's') flows more mellifluously off the tongue, and Daylight Savings Time is also in common usage, and can be found in dictionaries.

    Part of the confusion is because the phrase Daylight Saving Time is inaccurate, since no daylight is actually saved. Daylight Shifting Time would be better, but it is not as politically desirable.

    Sorry to be a grammar cop, but people should really get this correct. It's much like the whole hacker/cracker issue.

    --
    Alcohol & calculus don't mix. Never drink & derive.
    1. Re:There is no S after Saving..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure the official term is 'daylight saving time' but people refer to it as 'daylight savings' at least in the land where I was born.

    2. Re:There is no S after Saving..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who really cares anyhow? It's not like it makes a bit of difference. You're going to say/refer to it correctly. They're going to say/refer to it incorrectly. Oddly enough *everyone* is going to recognize what you're talking about, correct or not so drop off the high horse and let it go.

      A post to correct spelling and/or grammar is a post to say you have nothing to say.

  114. Sunny by dacarr · · Score: 1
    "The beauty of daylight-saving time is that it just makes everyone feel sunnier," said Reps. Edward Markey, D-Massachusetts

    Yeah. It's sunny as Hell here in southern California right now.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  115. Screw DST.. use "Internet Time!" by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    C'mon, let's bring back more "Internet *" stuff! Remember "Internet Time" from Swatch?

    I didn't think it was that bad of an idea, actually... it'd be great to see it on tvguide.com so I know exactly which time my favourite shows start. Comcast's tv guide has screwed up time zones before.
    Imagine not having to worry about setting up a teleconference. Just say "@258" and not have end users that can barely use the "transfer" function on the phone saying "What? 2:00 my time or your time? What about Bob's time?"
    Ugh.

  116. Daylight can't be saved ... by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    It's like mod points on /. Use it or lose it! Yes?

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  117. Does it matter?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My PC's internal clock is in TAI (atomic time without leap seconds). I use the "right" time zones in the olson database ("right/America/New_York"). My apps use TAI or UTC (or Unix times) internally. My databases store datetimes in UTC [*]. I always say "DAYLIGHT SAVING" instead of "SAVINGS". I know the technical and political differences between GMT, UTC, TAI, UT (UT0 & UT1), and TT. Put a few beers in me, and I'll tell you all about TDB, TCB, and TCG too. I don't fear DST changes, because I don't use DST in any of my apps! If you learn all this stuff, you too will recognize DST as the useless political yammering it is.

    Time zones (and therefore DST changes) are relevant in DISPLAYS (views, screens, output layer). Anybody who stores datetimes in an assumed timezone is asking for trouble. Anybody who stores times in such a way that Daylight Saving even matters, is asking for trouble. Anybody who stores three-letter time zone abbreviations instead of numerical offsets is asking for trouble. Anybody who does *calculations* with timezones is asking for MADNESS to set in.

    When or if any DST changes come, I'll just upgrade the time zone tables and everything will continue to function normally. Maybe if I don't do it right away, a few screens in my app will show numbers off by an hour at 2-3am. But it doesn't matter what the instant of time known as 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z will be called in the future, I know my apps will work properly at that instant. Or any other instant. As long as the definition of UTC doesn't change, I'm good to go.

    Sheesh. You'd think something horrible was happening.

    [*] MySQL Tip: if you're using most versions of MySQL, you don't have time zones in your DATETIME fields: that means they are UTC. If you store dates in some other assumed time zone, you're making a mistake! Postgres can store 'em with time zone offset so you're okay there.. you'd just be wasting some storage space with useless info.

  118. GMT by guard952 · · Score: 1

    So why is it we can't just all use GMT?!

    It's solve that "Your time or my time?" question. Sure, I'd be heading off for work at 9pm and getting home at 5am, but I could live with that.

  119. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, three days for you. Most people have learned by now that everyone responds to different stimuli in different ways.

    Every fall, the combined effect of the DST change and my Seasonal Affective Disorder cause me to have erratic sleep patterns for weeks, if not longer. I have a hard enough time as it is establishing a "regular" sleep schedule (which may work for a week or two until an insomniatic episode throws it for a loop), and arbitrarily re-establishing what time it is doesn't help at all.

    I see no reason why we can't just stay on DST permanently and forget this stupid clock changing bullcrap.

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  120. My watch will be correct more often by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I haven't adjusted for regular time in 4 years now. I've stayed on daylight savings time because I like it better that way in the winter. Now I'll be right for more than only half the year!

  121. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by MrElcee · · Score: 1

    All you base are belong to us!

  122. DST has nothing to do with daylight by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1

    Even in the new system the second Sunday in March 7-13 days before the equinox, while the first Sunday in November is 41-47 after the equinox. Conclusive proof that DST has ZERO to do with actual daylight.

  123. Make it last for 12 months. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it will go away.

  124. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by iocat · · Score: 1

    Actually for me, I don't even noticed it after the first 15 minutes. Do you travel to different time zones? Do you have the same trouble then? Maybe it's more the SAD than the time change itself...

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  125. On my blog, I wrote this a few days ago... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Time for a change? - USA changes their Daylight Savings Law

    The USA has decided it's high time to take time by force. Just watch them, this time the US federal government is passing a bill that extends Daylight Savings Time into March and November, which gives American children about another 60 days to get up and go to school in the dark, while making sure business executives have more daylight hours on the golf course after dinner. "Supporters say extending daylight saving time would save about 100,000 barrels of oil a day because offices and stores would be open while it was still light outside and therefore use less energy." - boston.com "A government study [conducted in the mid-1970s] estimated the additional energy savings at the equivalent of 100,000 barrels of oil a day, or about half of 1 percent of the nation's daily oil consumption." - suntimes.com When was the last time you saw an open store not using their lights when it was high noon? What business turns off lights when it is bright outside? Besides professional sports I can't think of one.

    OK, I guess you have to start somewhere, and every little bit can help right? Well let's take a look at their numbers and put them into perspective. 60 days of savings X 100,000 barrels of oil = 6 million barrels of oil saved. How does that amount compare to what is typically used in the USA in a day? "Gasoline demand has averaged almost 9.5 million barrels a day over the last four weeks, 2.5 percent more than the same period last year." " Oil prices today are 46 percent higher than a year ago." - bloomberg.com

    What that means is that after 60 days, the USA will have saved less than 1 day's worth of oil [using the conservative 100,000 barrels/day estimate from the 1970s study]. Is it worth it? Maybe.

    If you consider the wild media claims that billions of dollars are spent every year after cleaning up after a computer worm or virus attack, the expense at reprogramming everything computerized that is time sensitive is going to be astronomical. The man-hours to reprogram everything is going to be much greater than any time wasted on malware. It's like a self-imposed Y2K problem that has already been fixed, and we're going back to tinker with it in the guise of saving oil. You could say that the US legislative branch has put in motion a ticking time bomb. This bomb is going to blow this November, and is a potential cash cow for Microsoft [a heavy Bush supporter by the way], IBM, and many other computer programmers. Although it will leave your "smart" VCR or DVD player guessing the wrong time for two months out of the year thanks to its hard-wired clock programming. And it will burden airlines with yet another scheduling nightmare to worry about. And hurt the Canadian transportation industry if we don't standardize our time with the new American DST system.

    So this boils down to a huge waste of time, over an obviously insignificant amount of oil. Before the US government decided to plunge North America [and their other trading partners] into temporal chaos, it'd be nice if they considered the negative consequences of their actions. And it would also be nice if they took meaningful steps to reducing oil consumption such as strict fuel milage laws for new cars. But they don't have time for that I guess.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  126. Daylight Saving - What about NAFTA? by ve3oat · · Score: 1

    Surely changes to something as commercially and technically significant as standard time zones have to be negotiated with partners in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Regardless of what the U.S. Congress might like to think, negotiations are required to avoid penalties under NAFTA sections concerning cross-border trade and information sharing.

  127. Let's just ditch the concept of time altogether by 5plicer · · Score: 1

    If the Manson family can do it, so can you :p

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
  128. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

    What do you do if you ever have to get up early for some reason?

  129. lazy... by zivr · · Score: 1

    "Are some operating systems more open than others with regard to the configuration of daylight savings time start and end dates, or will we need yet another update or patch to modify the internal calendar" What a wanker, it not like you have to patch your own os, all you have to do is dl the patch.

  130. Daylight Trick-or-Treating? by coaxial · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    Upton noted that the extension means daylight-saving time will continue through Halloween, adding to safety. "Kids across the nation will soon rejoice," said Upton, because they'll have another hour of daylight trick-or-treating.


    Uhh.... daylight trick-or-treating? I'm sorry, but that's just wrong. I never trick-or-treated during daylight hours. It was always dark, my parents went with me to make sure I was safe. This is sad. Upton might as well said, "We have now just ruined Halloween nationwide."
  131. I don't want to trick or treat... by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

    ...in the damn daylight!!! Not that I trick or treat anyway, of course......

    --
    Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  132. POSIX compliant TZ format by Meetch · · Score: 1
    This works for GNU POSIX compliant systems, which means Linux (I've done it), and I assume FreeBSD, NetBSD and any other up-to-date *x...

    In short, specify what the time offset usually is relative to UTC, how much yer DST shifts the time by, when it starts and ends (time/day/month). It is flexible enough to define "the nth {day of week} of the month" such as 1st Sunday, 2nd... or last. Wheeeeee! Updates will surely follow in a GNU libc update in the near future.

  133. Been done already by fbform · · Score: 1
    yup, and the next logical step would be to *frigging use the same time all over the world*,

    I know you're being sarcastic, but many organizations whose workforce is scattered across the globe (such as the military) already do exactly this.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  134. uranium resource availability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    It is only a couple of decades before uranium peaks if we start replacing oil with it (in whatever form). Breeder reactors would double that time frame.

    I don't think so.

    Nuclear energy, assuming breeder reactors, will last for several billion years, i.e. as long as the sun is in a state to support life on earth.

    Source: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/cohen. html

    The page I cited has actual numbers to back up its claims. You provide nothing with which to back up your claims. I think I trust that page more than you.

  135. Hopefully... by Greg_D · · Score: 1

    ... it'll give people more of a reason to be active after work. Too many people get off of work at 5 and are stuck indoors by 6 for the rest of the day because that's when it starts to get dark during the fall/winter months. But in many states, it's not especially cold except between November and March. Giving people daylight until 8 or 9pm longer during the year will probably allow them to both save electricity and have more contiguous hours of free time during the weekend if they spend some of their new daylight hours getting stuff taken care of during the week.

    Can't really see too much of a downside.

  136. Best repartee ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Grandparent: Since I can have an extra hour of light at the end of the work day. That means I can get out on my bike and get some miles in before dark. And before you fuckers suggest that I go in to work an hour earlier, I must tell you that I cannot.

    Parent: Ride in the morning, dolt.

    Me: MOD PARENT UP!

  137. A problem with your logic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The absence of evidence does not constitute proof.

    However, on the other hand, the single counterexample given earlier completely invalidates your entire argument.

  138. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You'd think no one else in the world had ever dealt with DST before.
    What's stupid is the entire concept of Daylight Saving Time.
    In fact, timezones themselves are stupid.
    Everyone should be on UTC.

    Who said that local Noon should be when the Sun is directly above our heads?
    In fact, with time zones, the Sun can be directly above your head anywhere in the range between 1130 and 1230 (or even earlier/later, because time zones are not strictly longitudinal), and DST can increase the range even further.
    In the "old days", each town/city had its own time zone, synchronized to local Noon.
    The railroads were largely resposible for our current system of hourly time zones.
    There are places on Earth today that don't follow the hourly convention, and are one-half, or even one-quarter, of an hour "off" the conventional system.

    Why does the local day have to change when the Sun is on the other side of the Earth?
    I could kind of understand this back in the "old days", when everyone went to bed at sunset, but in our increasingly 24-hour society, in makes much less sense.
    What detrimental effects would there be if the day changed from Monday to Tuesday when it was light out?
    When everything is open 24 hours anyway, I doubt that there would be very many.

    Note that I don't mean that kids should be going to school in the middle of the night, etc.
    In some locales, kids would go to school at 1100 UTC, in others, at 1700 UTC.
    Note that they do this already; it's just that 1700 UTC may be 9 AM local time.
    People's schedules wouldn't necessarily change vis a vis daylight and nighttime; only the time measurement would change.

    If everyone used UTC, communications across time zones would be much easier.
    (No more "Is that 10 AM East coast time, or 10 AM West Coast time?".)
    People wouldn't have to reset their watches every time they visted Aunt Mabel in the next state over.
    The International Dateline would disappear.

    Oh, and since we would be doing such a massive change anyway, this would be the perfect opportunity to decimalize time (and it's about time that we decimalized time).
    Just think: With decimalized time, most people would be working only 3.3 hours a day!
    (On the down side, whenever anyone said "Just a minute!" or "Just a sec!", you would have to wait longer.)
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  139. Australia changed in 2000 by zsau · · Score: 1

    In Australia,* due to the Olympics, we started daylight savings a few weeks earlier in 2000. This meant that it would be on at a marginally more watchable time for Americans or something.

    I can honestly say that we got on just fine. We needed to insist that some Windows computers change the date, but it didn't cause planes to fall out of the sky the way the 1/1/2000 did.

    * Actually, in New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT. Everywhere else is on a different time zone/changes to DLS at a different time. But as everyone knows, Sydney==Australia, so my statement stands. (I went to Sydney last week for the first time, and they definitely seem to assume that Sydney==Australia.)

    --
    Look out!
  140. Seems like a real problem.... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

    We should get this worked out as soon as we get that whole Y2K thing licked.

    Seriously, don't computers already have to deal with this every year? Haven't we done this stuff before?

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  141. ... and Standard time prolongs rush hour misery by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    If you don't believe me, go driving across Miami at 6 or 7 pm the last Friday of DST, and compare it to the experience of driving at the same time the first Monday of standard time... or the next Friday or two (just to compare apples to apples).

    In the winter, I rarely go anywhere after work... it takes another half hour to get home, and I'm too burned out from the traffic to even CONTEMPLATE making a non life-or-death trip across town at 8pm.

    I wish Florida would join (possibly) Maine and go to year-round Atlantic Standard Time. Even on the darkest morning in December, we'd still have daylight by 8:30... and it would make evening traffic several orders of magnitude better in the winter.

  142. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only work 3.3 hours per day now, but my boss don't know it!

  143. It doesn't matter how open the OSes are by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
    If applications correctly draw their current time from the OS, then Apple and MS will update their time routines and push them out in a simple service pack/update. Many systems are set up to check in periodically can get their time from a central server, and those boxes (while perhaps running something custom) will just get a simple update, and then everybody will be happy. Cell phones will update just fine because they check with the tower often to get their current time (unless you go and turn the feature off).

    What's really going to be hard will be things like watches that change for you. Embedded devices that have been built to automatically adjust for DST: VCRs, DVRs, thermostats, etc. Not all of them do, and many don't care what time it is, or you set it yourself, but the ones that do it on their own will need a major system flash, or the user to be aware of the issue and fix it themselves.

  144. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see I get -1. Now that's truely American. Censor the people that are speak out on how dumb the US government is.

    Dear Ignoramus:

    How were you censored? Your post is there for
    anyone to read.

    Getting a -1 does mean that people are bored with
    posts from whiney fools. For a higher rating, try
    not being a whiney fool for a change.

  145. DST = i get 25 hour birthdays by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    ..every few years, extra time to party (or recover from said party). however, my brother's birday is at the other end of the year and he occasionally gets 23 hour birthdays, haha!

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  146. Re:For the love of God, moron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a single extra "s". Done have a heart attack over it.

  147. Bill Gates is behind it all! by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    Ok, don your tin foil hats campers, here goes!

    1. Changes to time and time zones are one of the least anticipated changes to an OS. Just look at Y2K.

    2. Most people don't update software if it still works to suit their needs. This isn't just the OS, but all supporting software.

    3. Bill Gates wished everyone used the latest Windows OS.

    Conclusion - Bill Gates isn't just pushing for changes to DST now, but for changes to time every 3-5 years to keep up with the release of new Windows OS's. Just watch as this change nearly guarantees that any business or person relying critically on Dos, Windows 3.1, Windows 95, and Windows 98 (which won't get patched anymore, iirc, and Windows 2000 joining them in the not too distant future) will be literally forced to buy new computers (Michael Dell is behind the conspiracy too) with Windows XP or better in order to operate under the new time changes.

    That's the conspiracy theory at least. But, the conclusion of who will benefit is most likely a given, and that's just in the tech sector.

    This change will have a serious economic impact, which will ripple across the entire world. It will weaken small and medium businesses that will be forced to upgrade, and strengthen big businesses that directly sell the necessary upgrades as well as indirect benefactors who will profit from their products being re-purchased or purchased to replace old software. (That old DOS inventory won't work on XP, you'll have to call Oracle for the latest software.)

    My opinion is to get it over with and change over to the logical conclusion of all of this, Triangular Earth Calendar [TEC], which features a symmetrical and intuitive calendar, and decimal time without time zones.

    --
    I8-D
  148. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by xappax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm all for simplifying baroque systems, but this doesn't seems like it would help that much. If, as you said, people would still get up in the morning and go to sleep at night, schedules would still be different everywhere, they would just be mapped to different numbers.

    If I wanted to communicate with someone in europe from the West coast, I would know that since it's 800 UTC here, it's 800 UTC there, but the significance of that number itself would lose meaning. So what if it's 800 UTC? Does that mean the sun's up there? Would they be eating dinner?

    In order to keep track of what 800 UTC means in different regions, we'd have to come up with a system of "zones" which could tell us approximately where the sun was in each region at a given UTC time, so that we'd know when it was okay to call, or whether they'd be doing business at 800 UTC.

    Maybe we could call this system "time zones", or something. Though I like "chrono-differential sectors" better.

  149. Re: Insulation by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    The only way to insulate the walls properly would entail taring out the dry wall on the outside walls of the house in order to place the insulation in situ.
    You might want to look into blown-in insulation.
    It requires a 2"-3" hole in the drywall between each stud, which means a lot of patching, but you don't have to tear down and replace the entire wall.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  150. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    What's stupid is the entire concept of Daylight Saving Time. In fact, timezones themselves are stupid. Everyone should be on UTC.

    Lets say I want to call someone in a different country:

    Current System: I know what timezone the person is in and add/subt. x hours to determine their time. I can know that it is not too early/late to call since I know that noon is esentially the same time everywhere.

    Your System: I know that it is X o'clock everywhere but have absolutely no idea what the relative time is. It would be nice if I had some handy chart listing the time differences around the globe huh?

  151. What do we do? by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

    I'm getting all of my governmental warnings mixed up. Is this one where we should buy duct dape and plastic for our windows, or do we just stock up on bottled water? Please respond quickly because I'm sure the Home Depot is packed with people that already heard the news.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
  152. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

    I see there are already replies that cover "How will I know the position of the sun in some other part of the world, I won't know if they are sleeping, eating, etc." So I won't reply to that part. However:

    When everything is open 24 hours anyway,

    I live in a medium sized city (approximately one million population). However, almost nothing is open 24 hours. The grocery stores generally keep one register open from 10PM to 7AM. "Greasy-spoon" restaurants (Dees, Village Inn, and one other I can't remember) stay open 24 hours. Everything else is closed. Think you're going to catch that late movie and get some food afterward? It's not going to happen. Everywhere is closed by the time the movie is over.

    I've also lived in small towns (pop: 15000). The only thing that stays open is the truck stop. A 24-hour world would be nice. However, it's a pipe dream.

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  153. daylight savings time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will this go into effect? Work at Home Paid Online Surveys Online Payday Loans

  154. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

    People who want a 24-hour world can find some semblance thereof in places like New York City (where everything except express service on the A line is available 24 hours) and Walmart (where everything except prescriptions and beer is available 24 hours). Heck, you don't even have to get that extreme. I live in a city of about 3 million - which is neither NYC nor Walmart - and in my neighborhood a good third of the hundred or so restaurants are open 24 hours.

    Sounds to me like you have lived in some very backwater places. One million people ain't squat these days; there are settlements of one million people that don't even have subway systems, which to my mind makes them villages at best.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  155. Re: Insulation by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    Another option is rigid styrofoam insulation. You put it on the outside of the house under the siding. It comes in 2-foot x 8 foot sheets in thicknesses from one to two inches. If your house needs new siding anyway, that's the time to install the rigid styrofoam insulation.

    With regard to blow-in insulation, you can sometimes get away with very little patching by using wide crown moldings. They look very sharp in the right kind of house.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  156. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

    Most of the western United States (with notable exceptions: Denver, LA, Vegas, and a few other high-profile places) are exactly like I described. However, you truly brought a smile to my face when you described Salt Lake City as "very backwater" because you are correct. The requirement of a subway was interesting. Does Light-rail count? As for Wal-Mart, they close at midnight; though the new Super Wal-Marts are open 24 hours.

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  157. Re: DST and Time Zones in General by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I've visited SLC now and then and wouldn't say it's exactly frontwater.

    The requirement of a subway was interesting. Does Light-rail count?

    I don't think I can let light rail count because of my general animosity towards it. It costs ten times as much as simply putting in dedicated bus lanes set off from general traffic lanes by raised curbs or other barriers, and offers no conceivable advantage except emissions displacement (which is substantially mitigated by CNG buses). Light rail seems like something that municipalities do when they wish they had a subway (so that I would stop calling them backwater) but don't want to spend the money to dig tunnels.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  158. Embedded Systems by oldCoder · · Score: 1
    Some embedded systems have a notion of DST and of local time. The right way to do this with networked embedded system (ATM's, phone switches) is to have each computer keep GMT(UCT) internally and know it's timezone and DST rules for local display.

    Think about what happens when the network crosses timezones and when data records containing time stamps go over the network. Data records should contain time in GMT and some indication of node-id (which would give you time zone) or the time zone itself. Mobile systems make it even more complex and more necessary to use UCT(GMT) internally. But GPS can provide enough information to help resolve ambiguities.

    I once coded for an embedded system that used a time chip that tried to perform DST changes on the time chip. It turned out that if the machine should reboot at 1:30 of the morning when the clocks get turned back -- there was no way to tell which 1:30 AM it was, the first one or the second one.

    Governments insist on playing with DST rules so computer systems (including embedded systems) should keep all time internally as a simple binary counter of ticks (seconds or microseconds for example) together with a notion of the time of the start of the epoch (zero ticks) and a configurable local time zone and DST rules. Do not rely on DST changing on some Sunday morning. Some months have 5 Sundays, so specifying the "4th Sunday in April" may not do what you want, anyway.

    For embedded system that do not have to display date and time locally, dispense with the whole concept of DST.

    Test your time software in Japan as well as London (virtually) as some code will break in that half of the earth.

    To save precious memory space, you can store the year in a 1-digit field for five more years :-)

    --

    I18N == Intergalacticization
  159. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

    Easy- stay up all night.

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  160. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

    The SAD definately has a large effect on it; however, it starts to affect me a few weeks before the time change. When the time change happens, any semblance of regular sleeping habit is thrown out the window. I haven't been to other time zones in a few years (can't travel when you can barely afford college...), so I can't say for certain that it would be the same, even though it's likely it would.

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  161. Re: Insulation by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    Rigid insulation is not an option as my house is brick veneer.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  162. Re:Power Grid Software by michaelhood · · Score: 1

    As an American I find it amusing that we run our stuff on GMT, which is in Britain. And now I find out that the Aussies are running on a predominantly American time zone.

  163. Re:USA think they're the rulers of the world and T by jeff67 · · Score: 1

    Besides, even if CommanderTaco had *deleted* the comment, it wouldn't be censorship. No government would be taking away your right to speak, a private party would be removing your speech from a system that they own! You want to complain about the US, get a blog.

  164. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What do you do if you ever have to get up early for some reason?

    Um... get up early? Seriously, were you trying to say something intelligent?

  165. Re:If you want to read about the studies... by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

    Well, if he can't handle the time change and getting up an hour earlier, what does he do when for some reason or another he has to get up earlier than normal? Like for an early appointment or something. Or if he has to stay up late and still get up at the same time the next morning?

  166. Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA have been doing daylight saving times differently from the rest of the world for many years (like a lot of other things). Developers spend millions in aspirine every year due to that.
    Now they take the burden to change their system, which will cost them an awful lot of money and will cause a lot of trouble of many an american man.
    And yet! They make it different from the rest of the world, again. Both dates chosen are exactly off by one week. Now if you go through the pain of changing dates anyway, then what does one week matter, why can't one take the occasion to get a little better compatibility everywhere.

  167. Abolish DST by CjKing2k · · Score: 1

    If it's good enough for energy hogs like Phoenix, then it's good enough for me.

    And on a side note: When Congress starts talking about energy, be afraid.