Slashdot Mirror


The MySpace Generation

theodp writes "They live online. They buy online. They play online. Their power is growing. BusinessWeek reports on The MySpace Generation, aka Generation @, for whom being online is a way of life. Preeminent among the virtual hangouts is MySpace.com, who boasts 40 million members and claimed the No. 15 spot on the entire U.S. Internet. And in When murder hits the blogosphere, MSNBC reports on MySpace's sometimes surreal role in popular news stories."

427 comments

  1. The Free Market of MySpace by dada21 · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I've been trying to write an article about MySpace for about 6 months, with the community changing faster than I can assimilate those changes into the article. MySpace is the ultimate free market in socializing, and it (or a system like it) has potential to being a huge part of every day life.

    All my teen employees in my retail stores are on MySpace. Most of my adult employees are, as well. At first, the dame and I thought it was just a hook up scene (it is, though). We were laughing at how we knew some parents of kids on there who thought their kids were 100% puritan, and the messages led us to believe the opposite. The average poster also leads me to reinforce my belief that the laws against non-violent voluntary action between two humans (drug laws, prostitution laws and others) are completely unnecessary.

    MySpace's greatest potential is beyond just the ability to moderate other people. MySpace offers everyone this amazing ability to be open about themselves, reduce embarassment, and even become more honest as a person. When I was in high school, cheating on your girlfriend was common, but secret. Today it is called hooking up and generally not frowned upon. Is this the direction society needs to head? I don't know, but I don't think this "freeing" of embarassment is a bad thing -- isn't sex always the leader in a societal change?

    MySpace is powerful in many other ways, connecting cliques with one another to create what is one of the most powerful non-corporate marketing forces ever. My brother's band increased downloads of their music almost 100-fold, and their concerts are significantly more populated by people who are friends-of-friends-of-friends. I also have found that kids as young as 11 won't buy Sony because their clique is connected to another clique that is boycotting the company. How awesome is that?

    Right now, MySpace is complete anarchy. Guess what? It works. For an anarchocapitalist such as myself, MySpace combined with eBay could be the utopian anarchist paradise we always dream of, at least in electronic form. Copyright is not a concern (have you seen the reckless abandon of music, video and image piracy? I love it). Sharing of information is open and natural. If someone hurts another person in any way, you can be sure that it will get through all the various local cliques and the offender will be castigated and watched more closely. Even peer review of one's actions is instant. One person can post an angry comment about another, and the "jury of one's peers" comes into action, either defending that person or realizing that the person is probably guilty of the action first posted.

    I know that when I was a teenager there were numerous things to be embarassed of. If I had known that others existed with similar emotions or thoughts or habits, I think I would have matured at a faster past (although it can be argued that today's teenageres are very immature but I completely disagree).

    MySpace is a profitable venture, slowly taking the place of schools, the law, the mall and even e-mail and IM. Parents need to be aware of it, too. I believe that those who think we need more government in our lives should carefully watch as the next generation gets along just fine, pushing together their millions of decisions and beliefs in the free markets trumping of democracy.

    1. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Funny
      In Summary:

      Myspace is a festering heap.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A festering heap of freedom.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's GNU/Freedom to you, mister!

    4. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, I've spent the last six months trying to get any random MySpace page to load without all the photos, videos, animations, sounds, java appletts and other mundane crap along with their retarded interface crashing any random browser I'm using on any random OS.

      MySpace is just the equivalent of AOL chat rooms. Those who aren't self-involved cliquish drama whores and dorks trolling for pussy from average girls with self-image problems over it are busy using Usenet and other more appropriate and useful places.

      My police for MySpace content is the same as LiveJournal. Don't ask me to check out your page on either one - I'm not going to look at it. If you want to tell me something, you can tell me. You are not so precious and my time so worthless that I need to share in a mass-broadcast on what kind of cheese you had on your sandwhich today or how cute you think someone else's hair bow is. I just don't care. If I don't know you at all - I won't care. If I do know you well enough to care about the news, I'd prefer you take the time to have a CONVERSATION with me rather than slip me a URL and tell me to read up on your life like you're Jennifer fucking Anniston.

      And I'm serious about this shit. Girlfriend, relative, coworker, love-interest. I don't care WHO you are. I won't check your page out.

      Also - there's nothing dangerous about MySpace. It's owned by Rupert Murdoch after all and Bill O'Reilly wouldn't stand for anyone putting children at risk, would he?! Hell no - he'd crusade against you until the tide forced you over!

      Seriously - I just don't get the MySpace thing. I think you have to be of a certain social accuity and lower intellectual level to find it worth your time. It has a terrible interface and is filled with crap. You may as well be using geocities for all it matters. Hopefully they'll just splinter off and form their own internet and take the tards with them.

      And there's no point in people replying with "oh and you're so special?!" or "aren't you elite?!" or anything, because I don't care anymore than I care about MySpace. Maybe if I were into hooking up with twelve year old girls, I would be interested.

    5. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Inaffect · · Score: 1, Funny

      sup nigga eye glad u like myspace az much az eye do. piece! hit me up sum tyme to chat - e-literate479

    6. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Wishing I had mod points, 'cause you need some plussing.

    7. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      And they dress poorly.

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    8. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by sp0rk173 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow. That's the most inaccurate picture of myspace i've ever seen. Myspace is not a beautiful anarchist e-topia. No, fuck that. It's a place where people can artificially inflate their egos, pretend to be things they're not to increase popularity (since the capital on myspace is your friend count, and nothing more), and places extreme emphasis on the superficial. No, it's not an anarchist e-topic. It's just like everyday life in the modern world. Even more, it's a centralized means for Fox to make a shit load in ad revenew. I'm always sure i've got privoxy fired up when i go on myspace.

      It's basically one giant rumor mill. There is no natural judicial system as you describe. The majority of messages i see posted on bulletins (the way to disseminate information to all your friends simply) are chain letters.

      You mention your brother's band and how myspace is a huge non-corporate marketing aparatus. It's definitely the best thing around for indie bands, and it has definitely helped a lot of local bands i see at bars...but if you look at the featured artist on their front page, you'll only see ones that are ones signed to fox-owned labels. So, while it does have extreme potential for small-band marketing, it's also a huge corporate marketing force for shitty, overrated music. Before fox bought myspace, pretty much only independent bands were featured artists.

      No, myspace is not your anarchist utopia. It's just another way to make business as usual hip for us mindless youngins. That said, i've "hooked up" with quite a few attractive ladies from myspace. So, it does have legitimate use.

    9. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      I agree in spirit, but you do sound like an elitist condescending douche. Almost bitter.

    10. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by ilyaaohell · · Score: 0, Troll

      I found your description far more accurate that the grandparent's long-winded hypefest, which seemed to be on par with that company's PR machine.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    11. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by mildgift · · Score: 1

      MySpace is "enterprise groupware".

      It's kind of like AOL, because all the apps are integrated and simplified.

      AOL was the previous MySpace. You just didn't know it. LOLz.

      The "free market" isn't MySpace. It's the whole net. MySpace is a single site.

      BTW, it runs on Cold Fusion with Fusebox. That is pretty amazing to me.

    12. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by HooliganIntellectual · · Score: 1

      That was an interesting post until you spouted that nonsense about being an anarcho-capitalists. Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron. Anarchism opposes the state and capitalism requires the state in order to survive.

      Perhaps you are a Libertarian, but saying you are an "anarcho-capitalist" just make you look incredibly ignorant.

      For the real scoop on anarchism, check out: http://www.infoshop.org/

      The MySpace kids are laughing at your faux pas about anarchism.

    13. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm all of those things. They just aren't relevant to why MySpace sucks. :)

    14. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MySpace's greatest potential is beyond just the ability to moderate other people. MySpace offers everyone this amazing ability to be open about themselves, reduce embarassment, and even become more honest as a person. When I was in high school, cheating on your girlfriend was common, but secret. Today it is called hooking up and generally not frowned upon. Is this the direction society needs to head? I don't know, but I don't think this "freeing" of embarassment is a bad thing -- isn't sex always the leader in a societal change?

      First off, "hooking up" can have one of any number of meanings, depending on who's using it. By the current generation of teens and young adults, it's generally what old timers used to call "casual sex." This can occasionally involve cheating, but usually doesn't (unless you mostly hang around total scumbags). On the flip side, it might not involve sex at all. I haven't examined all corners of the site, but I would wager that most people who use the term on MySpace aren't talking about cheating. While "hooking up" as in "casual sex" is not generally frowned upon by this group, "hooking up" aka "cheating" most certainly still is.

      As far as "the 'freeing' of embarrassment" is concerned... Embarrassment is what you feel when you realize you've been walking around all day with your fly open. Cheating on your apparently not so significant other is not about embarrassment -- it's about shame. And on that point, I agree that shame seems to be an endangered species in modern society. Some people think you should never feel guilty, or made to feel guilty by others, for your actions -- no matter how despicable. Sorry, gang, but there are some things we should feel bad about. Breaking a commitment with someone you claim to love is still one of those things.

      Anyway, you're completely overanalyzing MySpace and as a result missing the point by a mile. MySpace's success is pretty simple: it's a free, easy, and personalized way for young people to keep in touch with old friends and to make new ones (including, and most importantly, those of the opposite sex).

    15. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Liam+Slider · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anarcho-socialism (what you and many others seem to be spouting as the one true "anarchism" ) is an oxymoron. Anarchism opposes the state and socialism requires the state in order to survive.

    16. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Seumas · · Score: 1

      She listed her interests as soccer, talking on the phone, the beach and partying. "Books are gay," she wrote. She lied about her age, listing it as 17.

      A few hours later she allegedly stood by as her boyfriend, David Ludwig, 18, shot and killed her parents.


      Uh. A 14 year old girl, lying about her age with an EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD boyfriend who thinks "books are gay" and (if you read her profile) likes "partys".

      So mom and dad were oblivious to all of this (mostly the statutory rape thing) because, what, they were too busy obsessing over The SIMS or something?

    17. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by johndierks · · Score: 2, Funny
      Myspace is a festering heap.

      Actually, The Internet Is A Wasteland.

    18. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not into the whole MySpace thing because I'm past the age when I need to present myself and my life as a spectacle. It's a developmental stage thing, and I say that without being condescending.

      That said, it should be respected as a form of writing and publishing. If a friend or love-interest of yours has published their writing somewhere and asked you to look at it by sending you a link, then it is simply rude and obnoxious to say, "no, I want you to go back, cut and paste it, and send it to me." I, for one, would tell you to take a running leap.

    19. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Ira_Gaines · · Score: 1

      Yeah well Myspace hasn't helped me to get a girlfriend and I ahve been using it for 6 months!

    20. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      AOL was the previous MySpace. You just didn't know it.
      Ohhhh yes we did. The only reason we don't call what they... write... "MySpace-speak" is because it's still AOL-speak.

      "wut R u ^ 2 OMGLOLz!"
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    21. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Luckily for all the MySpace tards, who have numerical supremacy over the righteously indignant people like you, life will go on and the self-absorbed misfits will continue to interact, hook up, reproduce, and shop at Walmart before getting old and turning into moderate Republicans.

      The value of a MySpace profile is equal to the value of a Slashdot comment: next to worthless, so what's your point?

      You are spitting in the wind.

    22. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > That said, i've "hooked up" with quite a few attractive ladies from myspace. So, it does have legitimate use.

      Translation: I have masturbated while looking at the images of attractive girls myspace users have uploaded.

    23. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      myspace is what the owners want it to be. users exist only in the specific myspace framework.

      tho everyone uses it as a friends/hookups site its designed to be a music site.

      basically myspace is crap. it works, but it could be infinately better.

      its just the site of the moment.

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    24. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by IronChef · · Score: 1, Funny

      Proof that I am old fart at 34: I have never been to MySpace. However, I read Usenet daily.

      (I have never downloaded a "podcast" either. I have not run an IM program in 5 years, because jebus, all you people on my contact list... just leave me alone, don't you have anything to do but chat?! I have a web site, but since I don't post my feeeeelings about things I don't consider it to be a blog.)

    25. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I am sure the 18 year old knew her age just fine (she was just lying to myspace).

      The statutory rape is only an issue if they were having sex and odds are that she was an old 14 year old and he was a young 18 year old (since most people turn 15 as a freshman and turn 18 as a senior). It's looked down on by a lot of people but its fairly common for seniors (especially guys) to date freshmen. The books response is your typical stupid freshman girl...maybe she wants to go to "cosmology school" because you dont need books to cut hair and a lot of people put parties because well...they just do.

      --
      Bottles.
    26. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MySpace is to writing and publishing what a bowel movement is to art. Honestly, I can't even believe you would compare the two.

      If someone said "Hey, I wrote this great story" or "Hey, check out this review of the new movie I saw" - I would be interested. But I'm not going to read your block to find out "OMFG I'm so drink!!@!! I just got back from two partys and a consert! ROCK ON!!!!"

    27. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. I think something like MySpace, but designed around publishing art, articles, reviews, music, and videos, could be pretty cool.
      The only problem I would have with that is that I generally don't like reading people's fiction. It's mostly just because the stories are generally poorly written and include loads of grammatical errors.

    28. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a festering heap of easily stalked females.

      Just think. You go to wal*mart and Mandy helps you. Wal*mart is in your local town. Search MySpace for Mandy in the town between 18/25 and you just might find her and all her friends. next time you see her working "hey, don't you know nick?"

      you know her first name, her friends names, her interests, everything.

      it's ammo for people who are bad at dating or potential stalkers, alike.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    29. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by mildgift · · Score: 1

      Anarchists (aka social anarchists or anarcho-communists) say "smash the state, burn out the capitalists" and see the state and capital as partners in crime. (For example, their favorite enemies are the President, weapons makers, and prisons.)

      Anarcho-capitalists see the state as the main barrier to eliminating the minimum wage. They also see widespread impoverishment and miles of tenements as a business opportunity. They like security guards and the insurance business.

    30. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      MySpace is to writing and publishing what a bowel movement is to art. Honestly, I can't even believe you would compare the two.

      Everyone knows that if you want prime examples of quality well thought out writing, you just pop over to Slashdot.

    31. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      My police for MySpace content is the same as LiveJournal. Don't ask me to check out your page on either one - I'm not going to look at it. If you want to tell me something, you can tell me. You are not so precious and my time so worthless that I need to share in a mass-broadcast on what kind of cheese you had on your sandwhich today or how cute you think someone else's hair bow is.

      Firstly, I'm sorry if your friends are so boring that they only talk about what food they had, but not everyone's friends are like that.

      Now sure, I wouldn't expect someone not on LiveJournal, or someone who doesn't use RSS readers, to do so just to follow what I'm up to. But remember that your attitude is exactly the sort of thing that some people have said in the past.

      "Oh, I think Usenet is a stupid place full of trolls. I'm not going there. If you really care about me, you can take the time to have a conversation with me." or "Oh, I'm not going to get onto this Internet thing just so you can talk to me by email. If you really care about me, you can take the time to have a conversation with me in real life."

      For those people who use it, you can't change the fact that it is a powerful system for keeping in touch with people, organising events and so on, online, far better than email (either individual emailing, or mailing lists) for various reasons (most notably, it's "pull" rather than "push" so the readers decide what to read, rather than the writing having to make assumptions), and far better than Usenet (see below).

      Of course, the big problem is that it's no good for people who aren't part of it - it's not easy for those people who aren't signed up to the same or any community, though things like RSS and OpenID are changing that. Also there's no easy way of filtering (eg, something like a party invite or special announcement might be more important than more mundane matters, in the same way that the former would remain in my Inbox in my email, whilst more conversational things might be on a mailing list which gets filtered).

      MySpace is just the equivalent of AOL chat rooms. Those who aren't self-involved cliquish drama whores and dorks trolling for pussy from average girls with self-image problems over it are busy using Usenet and other more appropriate and useful places.

      Except Usenet, whilst good for what it does, is not more appropriate or better:
        - Can I make it so my Usenet posts are only readable by certain people?
        - Is there a way to not put up with spam on Usenet?
        - Can I read a particular set of posters (ie, everything they post, and only from those people)? It's not clear at all what newsgroups I should subscribe to, if I'm interested in using the medium to communicate with many existing friends, rather than being interested in a particular topic.

      In addition, Usenet has the same problem that you can't use it to communicate with people who don't watch Usenet.

      At the end of the day, if it's not for you, fine, and I'm sorry if you have lots of friends who badger you to read what they had to eat. But for those who do use such systems, they can be very useful.

    32. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by syukton · · Score: 1

      it's ammo for people who are bad at dating

      So... MySpace is for slashdot, then?

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    33. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Why is it amazing that it runs on cold fusion and fusebox? It's slow and buggy as hell. And...fusebox is made to be used with cold fusion...there's nothing innovative there.

      I have no idea where your free market comment came from...i never said myspace was a free market. I said it's basically used as a marketing tool for people and products. And yeah, it is like AOL, and it's becoming more like it as it matures. User-created content is being replaced by corporate-stamped content from Fox. There are myspace pages for fox shows, fox-signed bands, who knows maybe there will soon be a fox news myspace page. Anyway...your comments really added nothing to this discussion. And your use of "LOLz" made me want to gouge out my eyeballs.

    34. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post a picture of my cock on your profile and you're guaranteed to get smothered in MySpace pussy. What's your e-mail addy, dude?

    35. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer AFF to myspace, but that's just me...

    36. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like America?

    37. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip!

    38. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Usenet and other more appropriate and useful places.
      Oh my gawd, the Apocalypse is upon us!

      Seriously, though, get a grip, old-timer. I had never even heard of myspace until I overheard college kids talking about it, and I still have not bothered to go there. Just not my kind of place.

      That said, I think you are taking this waaay too personally. I mean, why are you bothering to post some rant about a site you don't even go to, and then lambast others for wasting their time writing useless stuff? It seems to me that you are doing exactly the same thing, wasting bandwidth just to get your opinions across to people who don't even know you, on a 'news for nerds' site, no less.

      Just because the myspace/livejournal crowd doesn't tickle your interest is no reason to flame them, they are after all just seeking the same things that we are - a community of like-minded people to chat with. Who cares if their lives aren't profound? Are Slashdotters any different?

    39. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a heaping fester of viral marketing opportunity? Yeah, that's what I thought.

    40. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      OK, fair enough - I've never gone to MySpace for more than a second. I have read some decent writing in Livejournal, though. There are some unexpected communities of interest there. And there is actually a sort of literary form that consists of making fictional character LJ's (and I imagine people could do the same with MySpace.)

    41. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by osbjmg · · Score: 1

      You make some good points from interesting angles. That being said, the anarchy will have limits and is being watched by Murdoch to leverage who knows what else down the line.

    42. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Rxke · · Score: 1

      Oh, but bowel movements are considered art. At least where I live, Belgium. Check out Delvoye's "Cloaca," a machine that produces exactly this... :D Oh, seems Americans consider it art too: http://www.absolutearts.com/artsnews/2002/01/25/29 594.html

    43. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A festering heap of freedom.

      A festering heap of crack.

    44. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      WoW! Why are you so angry and why is it focused towards MySpace and their users?

      Today was my first visit to Myspace and I looked at the various areas they offer, read some of the forums and blogs, looked at groups and did a quick personal search and it seems to be a lot more than 12 year olds since I did a quick search for women between 35 and 45 within 10 miles of my zip and got an enormous amount of hits back. This is not my type of hang-out, myspace that is, but I have no problems understanding why a lot of people use it. It's all in one place and easy to use even though it needs a more consistent look.

      But I really find it funny that geeks hanging out on /. with all it's less than intelligent comments to each story, get all huffy and puffy about myspace and manage to make themselves seem above "that" kind of people, yet write furiously on /. Logic at it's finest!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    45. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by identity0 · · Score: 0

      You know what? Fuck you guys.

      You're the Hustler generation, who still want to retain some kind of pretention to importance and merit while doing worthless crap. They are the Goatse generation, who just don't give a rip whether you think it's art, important, or worth your time - it's going to get posted online, whether you like it or not.

      You guys still seem to be of the opinion that putting something online should mean that thing has some kind of merit to it. This isn't really how it works anymore, people are using the web as more of a scratch-pad for scribbles and everyday stuff, it's a very casual medium nowadays.

      The thinking behind the blog generation is "Let's just put everything online, and let Google sort them out." Stuff on Flickr or livejournal isn't on the level of National Geographic or New Yorker, and it's not supposed to be - it's just the casual happenings of daily life.

      It's actually like David Brin's Transparent Society, except it's fueled by individual narratives instead of surveilance.

      Face it, you (and I) might hate AOL, geocities, livejournal, or whatever for putting a lot of clueless people online, but in the history of the internet, those things are going to be seen as more important than Slashdot or kuro5hin precisely *because* they popularized the medium. I saw in one of your other posts that you don't like red staters and think they should stay off your precious internet. Well that's too bad, the internet isn't going to be restricted to people who you like, *everyone* is going to be online whether you like it or not - did you know Kim Il Jong has an email address, and there are internet cafes in Mogadishu?

      The internet is becoming a reflection of the real world rather than geek culture, and I think that will be a good thing in the long run, even if it puts more idiots online.

      Sorry about the hostility, but I couldn't help but notice that for a site you claim to not give a shit about, you seem to spend a lot of time talking about myspace - ten posts today on the topic. I'm starting to get the feeling that you're just bitter because the internet is being taken over by 'lusers' and isn't the technical geek playground it once was. Are you really any different from the teenage 'punks' who spend hours online posting about how much they hate Avril Lavine, and how they liked their favorite band until they 'sold out'?

      If you really don't care about myspace, why did you spend 5 hours on a saturday posting comments on Slashdot about it?

    46. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but your presentation detracts from your message. Nice try, tho.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
    47. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks to MySpace I lost my virginity and found my girlfriend who I've been with for over a year!

      I'm in my mid 20's and was the geek who had no luck with girls. Not anymore!

    48. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1
      Anarchists (aka social anarchists or anarcho-communists) say "smash the state, burn out the capitalists" and see the state and capital as partners in crime. (For example, their favorite enemies are the President, weapons makers, and prisons.)
      They've also had a number of terrorists, quite willing to use bombs and assassination to get their way (one started WWI)...yet claim to be a misunderstood, peaceful movement that wouldn't hurt a fly. Bah. I've actually debated one who has said that quotes that he used before which said "revolution" this and "overthrow of the State" that weren't meant to be taken in a violent sense but in an "evolutionary" sense.... Sure, that explains all the anarchists through history who have been blowing stuff up and shooting people.
      They also see widespread impoverishment and miles of tenements as a business opportunity.

      Well, I suppose it is...any area like that is insufficiently economically developed. When people lack adequate shelter, food, clothing, etc... best thing to do is provide jobs so they can earn money to improve their way of life. :)

      I do agree with anarcho-capitalists on some things. Big fan of Free Market enterprise. And I agree that government is an evil. But I also believe it's a necessary evil. Just one that needs to be kept as small and harmless as possible. Anarchy of any stripe, historically, just leads to rule by the least desirable elements of society, and mass atrocity. Look at the French Revolution. A horrible time, and at the end of it....under the thumb of a power mad conquering dictator. Look at Somalia or Afghanistan (before the US invasion)....they quickly degraded into warlordism, oppression, and constant brutality. In my opinion some small agreement must be made between the People of a society to establish an organization for their mutal protection from the worst elements of themselves, who would come forth and enslave if they didn't. We call that government.

      So that's why I'm a minarchist free market libertarian.

    49. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Technically, anarchy means the absence of any authority. If they oppose some form of authority but covet another, it's not anarchy anymore. Yes, it seems unlikely that any form of social organization could exists without any form of authority at all. That's why anarchy is mostly just a theory or a temporary state of things, never a reality.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    50. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Fallout2man · · Score: 1

      MySpace has a lot of potential, unfortunately its execution is lacking. Right now its entire focus is primarily a numbers based game. The site has created a sort of self-sustaining black hole status where it sucks people in due to its size, it grows and then can suck even more in. The problem though is it lacks any sort of polish or quality focus.

      For a key example, the ability to embed HTML and totally change your profile. This can and has as I've seen routinely allowed users with no knowledge of HTML to break the page or just make plain horrible-looking pages. They also allow unrestricted embedding of audio and video which can be annoying when a page has ten or so songs/videos all auto-playing on page load.

      Why was this done? Your guess is as good as mine however my bet was it was an easy way out for customizability. It gives users total control, but as I said earlier about not having a quality focus, it can in fact enable users to de-value the site by creating horrible and/or broken profiles.

      So here we are now with an article stating NewsCorp wants to build a brand out of a fundamentally flawed product. Not to say it may not make some profit. However without something short of radical changes to how the site works they're potentially facing what could eventually be a big user exodus if a competing site can create a superior quality-focused and feature-rich environment that trumps what MySpace has.

      I also have to say I find it hilarious they think celebrities are actually on MySpace. Obviously nobody's informed businessweek of the common practice referred to as faking, or pretending to be someone you're not using fake pictures (which unlike other sites MySpace makes no attempt to prevent and does little to nothing to identify/remove said accounts at all.)

      There are better sites out there that are doing the things MySpace should be doing right now. If they're too slow to move someone else may steal their thunder and a good chunk of their user base eventually. Especially with how I've been hearing from people frustrated with their frequent downtime and errors lately after the NewsCorp acquisition.

    51. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if any thing, does slashdot have to do with this puff piece regarding the *Microsoft* blog service. MS Spaces, a recreation of bulletin boards circa 1979.

      Slashdot, do you have to give this PR Officer~1 Space(s) on your web site ?

    52. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Petey_Alchemist · · Score: 1

      You're incorrect on some very salient details.

      While it's true that MySpace does offer some amazing features to its consumers--especially bands, and on "hive knowledge" like the Sony rootkit effect--many of the effects it has are undesirious. There are several specific points that you make with which I wish to disagree.

      To wit:

      1) Today it is called hooking up and generally not frowned upon. Incorrect. Even at my extraordinarily liberal school system (where, last year, fifty percent of the incoming freshman class had been banned from their eighth grade trip to D.C. because of marijuanna and heroin use) cheating was no more accepted socially than it has ever been. I've comforted too many girls who cried about their scumbag boyfriends to think otherwise.

      More importantly, you are incorrect in your assessment of the teenage conception of MySpace. As has been posited before in other threads about teenagers on the web (notably this one), teenagers do not view their posts as being public. The teenage conception of the Internet is a strange one. I myself realized at an early age (9th grade) the public nature of the Internet, because I was disciplined at my school for making a website that ridiculed a fellow student. But I knew peers who, throughout their years, shared the same initial perception that I had: that while I knew intellectually the public nature of the Internet, its vast size made for effective anonymity. The only people who ever knew about my blog were people who I told! A girl in my senior class, who was kicked out of NHS for making derogatory posts about teachers on her public LiveJournal, was furious--she had thought of her posts as being effectively private, just because they were posted on a blog she hadn't explicitly told her teachers about. In this way, you can't expect that all posts made on MySpace are made with the perception that the teenagers are comfortable with the old internet rule of "would you show your grandma this." I guarantee that if you had shown any of the parents of the students who worked for you their promiscuous MySpace posts, you would have been vilified by your employees, because they would have been heartily embarassed to have their parents find out what they post "publicly."

      2) If I had known that others existed with similar emotions or thoughts or habits, I think I would have matured at a faster past [sic]. You make a similar point to this one several times throughout your post, and I must gravely disagree that this tendency is beneficial. While I myself am totally in favor of the effect of the Internet on one's intellect--by vastly increasing the possibilities of exposure to new ideas, a quality never to be remanded--I am not in facvor of the Internet's influence socially. I am a member of the "Lowtax" school of thought. Richard "Lowtax" Kyanka, founder of Something Awful, holds that the problem with the Internet is that it takes an isolated extreme minority (e.g. furries) and allows them to meet others of their ilk. This is not a bad thing. However, the problem arises when meeting even five to ten other furries makes the one--who, remember, has been strikingly alone in their thoughts for all their lives--feel globally justified as the status quo (or at least as a significant minority). While I am no stickler for traditionalism, I firmly believe that the social effect of the Internet, in regards to the way it can seem to justify by numbers certain vile practices (esp. furries and pedophiles), can be very negative. MySpace is a key contributor to this problem--and while the concept is great, the actual effect is not so much.

      Again, don't get me wrong, exposure to intellectual information is never bad. But asking someone to draw complex intellectual conclusions from MySpace is like asking a /. reader to derive a keen understanding of modern technology from reading onl

    53. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      ...some small agreement must be made between the People of a society to establish an organization for their mutal protection from the worst elements of themselves, who would come forth and enslave if they didn't. We call that government.
      The "worst elements" then infiltrate the government and use it for their own purposes.

      History of the world in one paragraph. Not bad.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    54. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      Better if we can confine them there, if we've gotten to the point of making government mostly harmless and incapable of doing much in the first place. And accountable to the People when it does do something. We're not quite there yet, but we're getting closer. Closer than at any point in human history.

    55. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes and no...It still is possible to set your profile to where the only way someone can see it is if you have them added as a friend. Thus, if they try adding you, you can reject it. (Or in this example, Mandy could reject it).

      Not many people set their profiles that way, either (a) because they don't know how (a likely story), or (b) because they really just don't care too, and like to meet new people.

    56. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by mildgift · · Score: 1

      What about all the capitalists throughout history who have been blowing up people, via war, and killing people with inadequate workplace safety regulations?

      There are many different kinds of anarchists. Some are violent. Yet, these violent anarchists don't invade countries and conduct war to enlarge empires. The people they have killed are the powerful leaders and industrialists.

      If you're against government, but not against the capitalist enterprise, then you are an extremist capitalist. There's no "anarchism" in that.

      Anarchism is against all forms of hierarchy, and that means if any government is created, it's task is to dismantle or destroy hierarchy as it forms, whether it's capitalist enterprise, monarchs, religion, gangs, experts, or government (via self destruction). They (we) believe that the ultimate goal is a society of many local organizations to provide social welfare via mutual aid groups.

      It's very romantic and somewhat anti-technology. It's also self-destructive, as many anarchists are or have been business owners, royalty, religious leaders, gangsters, experts, and in government. (Oddly enough!) Many more, however, have been regular people with a fire in their belly to upend society and achieve freedom.

    57. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by robogun · · Score: 1

      ...images of attractive girls myspace users have uploaded.

      They didn't upload shit. They hotlink & pull the pics right off my server. Nothing is more fun than detecting this and substituting a goatse pic.

    58. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      What about all the capitalists throughout history who have been blowing up people, via war, and killing people with inadequate workplace safety regulations?

      There are many different kinds of anarchists. Some are violent. Yet, these violent anarchists don't invade countries and conduct war to enlarge empires. The people they have killed are the powerful leaders and industrialists.

      First, I believe war existed before capitalism, don't blame capitalism for the fact that war exists. War has always existed as long as there's been groups of humans that didn't get along with other groups of humans. Heck, war exists among non-humans. Chimpanzee tribal groups wage war between each other. We didn't even invent war. Don't blame modern Capitalism for it, nor expect that you have the perfect solution to it.

      And yes, they don't invade countries and "wage war"...but they do call for revolution, violent overthrow, and they have started wars...including setting off a rather nasty World War. I'd call that damn close enough.

      If you're against government, but not against the capitalist enterprise, then you are an extremist capitalist. There's no "anarchism" in that.

      Name any economic system that has gotten more people out of poverty than Capitalism? Name any economic system that has, in any country it's established in, eventually brought about more middle class than poor. It sure isn't socialism. Capitalism has proven itself as the single greatest tool for bringing people out of poverty in the history of the world. Nothing wrong with being a fan.

      Anarchism is against all forms of hierarchy, and that means if any government is created, it's task is to dismantle or destroy hierarchy as it forms, whether it's capitalist enterprise, monarchs, religion, gangs, experts, or government (via self destruction). They (we) believe that the ultimate goal is a society of many local organizations to provide social welfare via mutual aid groups.

      And exactly how would this be enforced? How would you ensure that nobody stands up and says "this is mine"? Sounds like via organized group to me. And these "local organizations to provide social welfare via mutual aid groups" sound suspiciously like a form of local government to me. The ideal of a system to "destroy hierarchy in all it's forms" sounds nice...problem is, people naturally seek the leadership of others. If there is a lack of such authority, people will create it amongst themselves, either by choosing a leader, or having one forced upon them. It's simple human nature. The Alpha Male and Alpha Female lead the pack. The strong (personality, wisdom, intelligence, charisma, or brute stength) lead, the others follow. It's instinctual.

      BTW, you want to see what anarchy looks like? Want to stare it in the face? A society with no rules, no government, no law? Look no further than New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit. In that city there was no order, there was no control. The strong took what they wanted from the weak. There was murder, rape was commonplace, and those with criminal mindsets grouped together into gangs that managed to getfairly well armed. Workers delivering aid were shot at, helicopters flying out the sick and dying were fired on.

      Or take LA during the riots. Buildings went up in flames. Anyone who's skin color didn't measure up got dragged out and beaten by mobs. People got shot and killed. People took whatever they wanted from whoever had it. There was lawlessness and disorder.

      That's your anarchy. That's your anarchist society, or what it would turn to. People are not insects. We are not ants or bees who follow our programmed paths to serve the collective. We are brutal, savage, apes who got good with projectile weapons and had enough brains to figure out how to not only make tools...but improve on them. "Perfect communist societies" simply are not possible with this animal.

      It's very romantic

    59. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha

    60. Re:The Free Market of MySpace by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      And this is why I like LiveJournal -

      I can post what I want to it, when I want, and share such links with friends, family, anyone with a browser that has internet access. This is relatively important for things like news articles, links, pictures, etc.

      It's straight HTML, none of this Active Server crapola, or proprietary interface... I can post directly to it from a web site, email, voice or any number of clients for any platform.

      Oh, did I mention that it's Open Source? And so are the clients? It's flexible, can be made secure, reliable, and it's well maintained.

      If you're like me, you have a zillion people that you interact with on a daily basis, but you may not have time to send each one an email stating, oh hey, XYZ happened. It facilitates discussion and interaction. And I only have to post it once. It's turned into a digital scrapbook of a kind, along with my political interests thrown in there.

      That said, safety and security is paramount in today's age, and if ya'll think I use my given name online, you're nuts. Not for anything that isn't directly business related, and that includes ordering online. Everything I use is fake. And no pictures of ME are posted to the 'net outside of email. As yet... and probably never. I don't need the stalkers ya know?

      Sure, any one of the networking sites is filled with rumour and drama and suckdom, but you find that in same said social circumstances in life, too. You just have to turn up your filters. And goddamn I didn't know that Fox owned MySpace, thanks for the tip... I gotta hook up my people that INSIST on using it, cuz they might DJ once in a blue frickin' moon. (since when did DJing become 'musicians'????

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  2. Yeah, what's the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With these freaks that post online all day, with their little friends, and their little hobbies that most people don't care about.

    I'm glad I'm a part of a place like Slashdot that doesn't have any of that.

    1. Re:Yeah, what's the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love how everyone on here is so concerned about what other people do. Myspace is a place for friends, people that know eachother in real life, and it's also a place for people to meet others. Whats the big fucking deal? why don't you all get lives, instead of sitting on the computer, and complaining about a fucking website. You're all probably too fucking ugly to get any friends of myspace whatsoever, and now you're bitter. Don't reply to this, Im not coming back and reading what any of you fags has to say about this. GET A LIFE. as we would say on myspace, kthx.3

  3. Losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Previous generations got entire words to their name. At least some of us got letters (Generation X is cool). But you kids today have been reduced to punctuation. At least you're better than Generation colon.

    1. Re:Losers by kalel666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, man! Generation Colon blows!

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  4. I hope our youth likes giving away it's rights by PlayfullyClever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hope you like giving away your hard-earned works for free to Fox.

    From the TOS: By posting Content on any public area of MySpace.com, you automatically grant as well as represent and warrant that you have the right to grant to MySpace.com, an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, and distribute such information and content to MySpace.com and that MySpace.com has the right to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such information and content, and to grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing.

    --
    Check out my website: Playfully Clever
    1. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away it's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is no longer true. Section 5c of the Myspace T&C has changed. It now reads:

      c. By posting any Content to the public areas of the Website, you hereby grant to MySpace.com the non-exclusive, fully paid, worldwide license to use, publicly perform and display such Content on the Website. This license will terminate at the time you remove such Content from the Website. You represent and warrant that: (i) you own the Content posted by you on the Website or otherwise have the right to grant the license set forth in this section, and (ii) your Content does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyright rights, or other intellectual property rights of any person. You agree to pay for all royalties and fees owing any person by reason of any Content you post on the Website.
      Read it for yourself; parent: Please stop spreading false information.
    2. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away it's rights by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

      you sound as if myspace's tos were the first you ever read

      --
      -- lol pwned
    3. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away it's rights by Psx29 · · Score: 1

      So what happens if I put a link to an mp3 that's hosted on another site? Do they cliam to own this as well?

  5. What Myspace shows by mboverload · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What scares me most about MySpace is the people on it.

    If you were to surf myspace you would think every teenager on earth is a complete fucking moron. DON'T mod me troll. Look for yourself.

    Backrounds, stupid text colors, backround music, animations, inability to use the english language, and much more. I don't think I can express in words how worried I am at the stupidity of the comming generation.

    1. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "comming" ?

    2. Re:What Myspace shows by steved3298 · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what feels like to be part of this generation. This is all kids talk about and do. The purpose of MySpace is a good one, but has spiraled out of control.

    3. Re:What Myspace shows by ImaNihilist · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. MySpace is a disease. The internet would be a better place if MySpace never existed. Our only hope is that the site goes pay, and everyone drops off it. Let's pray. Let's pray for the salvation of the internet, and humanity itself.

    4. Re:What Myspace shows by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, pretty much. Read my summary of the first post for my blatant feelings about myspace.

      I just dont understand how people can think it looks good to have bright pink text and a purple background overlayed with a floating image while forcing you to listen to music and squint past the animations. As a college student I get to use the Facebook which is similar in the social networking but different (and I applaud them) in the fact that THATS ALL IT IS. There is no ability to make your profile bright and unreadable. There is no way to play music...etc. They are adding new features but I hope they stay true to their ideal...

      I once made a myspace account to look at a friends (I believe mine is titled "myspace sucks" if anyone wants to hunt me down) and even though I have always known hers as a nice, smart, intelligent girl (well, she is kind of a whore but...a smart one). I look at her profile and though she has abstained from the completely unreadable format, I read all of the things her friends have written on it and they are like "Aw damn gurl joo be shakin on HOTT" and unfortunately have the ability to choose thier own color schemes. Within a few days of making my account, putting in nothing more than a little basic info that they asked for when I made it, I got several friend requests from people I went to highschool with that I probobly hadnt talked to since my sophomore year. It's amazing that they check enough to decide "hey this person wasnt my friend and I will never see them again but they JUST made a myspace account so I should friend them"

      --
      Bottles.
    5. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent is cmpltly rite. al my m8s thnk myspace gay. we all no it!!! lol!

    6. Re:What Myspace shows by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Sorry to reply to myself but I remembered another disparaging trait about myspace that I just noticed a severe case of when I went to look while writing my last post:

      The people who have conversations via posts on each others profiles. It makes like a stream of nonsensical posts since you can only see one side of the conversation and simply seems inefficient. Any number of tools would be more efficient, IM, Email, Phone, even MySpace's own IM system since both people are both obviusly signed into myspace.

      Maybe the reason that myspace has gotten so bad compared to something like Facebook is that while facebook requires enough intelligence to get into a Facebook school (though they keep adding lower and lower quality schools so...), Myspace requires you to be nothing more than a stupid 14 year old skank.

      --
      Bottles.
    7. Re:What Myspace shows by generic-man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So in other words, the "comming generation" is to MySpace as our generation is to Geocities. The Internet* survived Geocities; it can survive the "blogosphere"; and it can survive MySpace.

      * By which I mean "the group of elitists on the Internet who wish there were literacy and knowledge requirements to use the Internet," also known as "Usenet."

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:What Myspace shows by Seumas · · Score: 0

      There's a purpose to myspace other than 30 year old men trying to pick up on insecure teenagers and insecure teenagers fawning over each other and hooking up at local myspace meetings?

    9. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      inability to use the english language

      how worried I am at the stupidity of the comming generation.

      All my worries for your generation didn't help either...

    10. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to that good sir, i have one thing to say:

      LOL!

    11. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think I can express in words how worried I am at the stupidity of the comming generation.
      I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that was a typo. :P

      Anyway. I'm inclined to agree -- even adults are fucking morons nowadays. I won't go into a rant (it's mostly politics, and I hated politics until I found a reason to care (now I just hate politicians :-))), but you should be even more afraid once you realize a lot of these retards are going to vote one day.

      (I'm technically a part of this Dumbass Generation. I get to talk shit on it.)
    12. Re:What Myspace shows by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently the mission statement for MySpace is similar to Google's (in a way). That is, the organize and network all the world's idiots.'

      Also, why would anyone go meet myspace people? They spend all their time on the stupid thing. Wouldn't you want to meet and befriend or date people that... I don't know... get away from the computer sometimes?

    13. Re:What Myspace shows by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the elitist whiner's who were making snickers at Americans buying flourescent velvet Elvis pictures in Mexico and bringing them back to the states as "artwork" to hang on their walls.

      A noted American artist interjected: "art appreciation has to begin at some level, they will become more educated, more selective and more discriminant as they continue wherever they choose as their starting point in art - its all art".

    14. Re:What Myspace shows by Council · · Score: 1

      "There's no accounting for taste" is often the best attitude to take.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    15. Re:What Myspace shows by Cenuij · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree with you more.

      This statment of fact rather neatly illustrates why more younger people these days are lacking in plain ordinary social skills. You know... the kind a 12 year old *should* start picking up as soon as they leave primary school and start socialising with their teenage peers.

      Sure the relative anonymity can be liberating but online socialising should *never* replace the healthy amount of physical socialising thats probably required for mental well being. We all probably spend too much time online ( IRC anyone? ), but up until now most of us had already matured to adulthood and gained these necessary skills before we started wasting the hours away online. What happens to the new net generation when they hit adulthood and cant interact on a basic human level?

      --
      my other sig is written in brainfuck ;)
    16. Re:What Myspace shows by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      Oh...back when geocities had you "move into" your site. You had to pick like what block you wanted to be on and pick a number on that block since seemingly they couldnt figure out how to offer personalized addresses. I'll never forget you www.geocities.com/alien/zarbstreet/9982/ ...or was that xeroave/8892?

      --
      Bottles.
    17. Re:What Myspace shows by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just don't get it. Myspace is Friendster, only instead of yuppies, hipsters, and college students, it's populated by complete morons. All my friends from college and high school are on Friendster and/or Facebook.com. MySpace gets the lowest-life, most guido New Jersey and Long Island trash people I've ever seen, the teenagers who are too dumb to know any better, and a couple of pervs I know in their later 20s who just go there to pick up on dumb 17 year old girls.

      I actively choose not to be associated with MySpace. Why? Because it's about as low class as anything I could imagine. Call me an elitist yuppie, but I would never want to be caught with a profile on that site, until they manage to improve their image massively, i.e. get rid of the massive guido overload factor in their userbase.

      Please reference the number of pics of dudes in sleeveless wifebeaters with muscle shots, tatties and gang slogans in their profile for evidence. So terribly classless.

      At least Orkut had geek chic before it was overrun by the Brazilians.

    18. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Myspace users are a generation now? Holy shit, time to buy stocks in ritalin and stupid fucking web quizzes. I'll be rich.

    19. Re:What Myspace shows by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geocities, 1996. 'Nuff said.

      --
      Smegma.
    20. Re:What Myspace shows by YetAnotherLogin · · Score: 1

      "dotcom"-ming, i guess

    21. Re:What Myspace shows by philipkd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this whole myspace glut quickly reminds me of geocities. And we know what happened to them.

    22. Re:What Myspace shows by Justin205 · · Score: 1
      I agree completely.

      Unfortunately, I also hold the shame of belonging to that age group, myself being 16. They, on the whole, are a group of not-so-intelligent people, who are completely incapable of coherent thought on the internet.

      In person, they are somewhat better (as speaking badly is more difficult to do than typing - due to being around people who speak, more or less, correctly most of one's life), but not that much, sadly. It does vary more from person-to-person than on the internet, however.

      And I certainly agree with them not having a clue how to use correct grammar, spelling, or design sense on the internet. I work on my school's website and when I asked several people what they thought would be good elements for such a design, the most common responses were...
      • Bright colours
      • Music
      • Videos/animated images

      Those listed items are some of the most idiotic ideas one could possibly place on a serious web page. Plain colours (black/white/grey, with some colour on a logo, and similar colours to the logo for links), few images (just a logo is generally fine, with maybe one or two small ones more), no videos (not on a main web page - a page of videos if that's something useful for the content), no animated GIFs (major annoyance and distracts from the content), and certainly no background music (I'll listen to my own music, thank you).

      Don't even get me started on how they cannot use spelling or grammar... Seriously, how difficult is it to type in an extra letter or two on words such as "you", "are", "your", "you're" (they get those last two mixed up, in addition to bad spelling), "what", "why", and so forth... Most annoying thing ever. And unfortunately all the people my age I know at school, and around where I live act and type like that, no matter what they're like in 'real life'.

      Definitely is scary that these are the people who will be running the world in twenty years.

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    23. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, myspace sucks ass. But so do you. You come across as an obnoxious prick. Since you don't seem to have a clue, I'll give you one: Yuppies, hipsters, and college students are also complete morons.

    24. Re:What Myspace shows by someonewhois · · Score: 1

      Pffsh there are probably hundreds of thousands of people with "myspace sucks" as their profile title. ;)

    25. Re:What Myspace shows by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i think it was more to keep control of users, back then computer resources were much more expensive so making sure everyone's page was on [one of a few strings]/[one of a few strings]/[integer]/ made it easier to filter potentially malicious requests and probably also was realted to which server cluster the site would be stored on.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    26. Re:What Myspace shows by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      What scares me most about MySpace is the people on it.
      The only way this is related to MySpace, is that MySpace is letting you perceive these people. Even without MySpace, those people are still out there. You might as well have said, "what scares me about humanity, are the people in it."
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    27. Re:What Myspace shows by c_forq · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't know the America that I do. Most of America is small towns of blue coller workers and farmers. I am originally from a town of less then a thousand with a fabrication plant and surrounded by farms. There are maybe 20 people who don't work with steel or on the farm, neither of which is a 9-5 job (the factory runs 3 shifts, is open from 4am to 2am, and everyone I know that works there has to put in 80 hour weeks for at least 2 months of every year).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    28. Re:What Myspace shows by countchoc12 · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right. MySpace is a disease.

      Just like slashdot!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Soviet Russia jokes make YOU!
    29. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was America of the 1800's, things have changed. sure backcountry towns like you grew up in may be like that, but any place near modern civilization doesnt' meet your description of America

    30. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...inability to use the english language..."

      WTF is a "backround"? The first instance is a forgivable typo. But twice? In the same sentence?

    31. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were to surf myspace you would think every teenager on earth is a complete fucking moron. DON'T mod me troll. Look for yourself.
      Backrounds, stupid text colors, backround music, animations, inability to use the english language, and much more. I don't think I can express in words how worried I am at the stupidity of the comming generation.


      You're use of the term 'the english language' doesn't make you sound like such a genious either. People on MySpace are socializing, talking as they would with friends and family; there is certainly no need for them to be applying prescriptive rules of grammar Prescription and Description

    32. Re:What Myspace shows by DJCF · · Score: 1
      I disagree. Like you, I have accounts on some of these sites (not MySpace -- I don't know anyone on it, so what's the point?) simply so I can post to or look at the sites of friends who I know in real life. In fact, if you managed to find any of my profiles, you'll find they are nothing but poorly disguised advertisements for my own site. Because why would I post to a crappy xanga interface when I can use emacs, vi, or notepad and the comfort of my own filesystem? But I digress...

      I don't like sites like faceparty, which don't allow any HTML tags. All pages on faceparty are the same, identical, bland. The real reason I hate faceparty is because I couldn't insert a javascript redirect, like I have done with my xanga site. Let me tell you a bit about myself. The first technical experience I had with computers was HTML posting in an excite message board. That went on to building websites using notepad, then learning about the filesystem and then image formats, then to javascript, php, Visual Basic, on to Linux, database management, from there data abstraction and the ability to think logically about complex systems. Now hopefully to a degree in the Philosophy of Logic Philosophy of Science and Computational Science from a prestigous university.

      Now think about it. Xanga lets you insert HTML. Faceparty doesn't. An entire generation is growing up knowing HTML. From there they progress to learning about the filesystem (no more "Daniel, why can't I see www.server.com/BLA.jpg?" Me: "Because its a Linux server, and you're typing it in capitals"), then onto rudimentary JavaScript. Sure their sites are crappy, with ludicrous colour schemes and revoltingly non-compliant HTML. But they're learning. And maybe they even discover that being a geek isnt as boring as they've been taught.

    33. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a 17 year old student, please let me assure you it doesn't represent all teenagers. At least not my circle.

    34. Re:What Myspace shows by DJCF · · Score: 1
      I disagree. I have accounts on some of these sites (not MySpace -- I don't know anyone on it, so what's the point?) simply so I can post to or look at the sites of friends who I know in real life. In fact, if you managed to find any of my profiles, you'll find they are nothing but poorly disguised advertisements for my own site. Because why would I post to a crappy xanga interface when I can use emacs, vi, or notepad and the comfort of my own filesystem? But I digress...

      I don't like sites like faceparty, which don't allow any HTML tags. All pages on faceparty are the same, identical, bland. The real reason I hate faceparty is because I couldn't insert a javascript redirect, like I have done with my xanga site. Let me tell you a bit about myself. The first technical experience I had with computers was HTML posting in an excite message board. That went on to building websites using notepad, then learning about the filesystem and then image formats, then to javascript, php, Visual Basic, on to Linux, database management, from there data abstraction and the ability to think logically about complex systems. Now hopefully to a degree in the Philosophy of Logic Philosophy of Science and Computational Science from a prestigous university.

      Now think about it. Xanga lets you insert HTML. Faceparty doesn't. An entire generation is growing up knowing HTML. From there they progress to learning about the filesystem (no more "Daniel, why can't I see www.server.com/BLA.jpg?" Me: "Because its a Linux server, and you're typing it in capitals"), then onto rudimentary JavaScript. Sure their sites are crappy, with ludicrous colour schemes and revoltingly non-compliant HTML. But they're learning. And maybe they even discover that being a geek isnt as boring as they've been taught.

      (And, slightly off-topic, the person who was responsible for the ability to embed any kind of audio or video in a webpage... should be shot.)

    35. Re:What Myspace shows by Olix · · Score: 1

      In person, they are somewhat better

      This is the worst part! I don't talk to people who aren't nerds much, but in my school I always got the general feeling that all the norms weren't really that bad. I would walk through social area's and see them talking, working or laughing, but in general seeming pretty intelligent and OK. But then I managed to find my way to some of their profile pages on Bebo.com, a site similar to MySpace, I suppose. All these people I thought were intelligent had these horrible, multicoloured profile pages up with bad spelling and nasty "about me" quizzes.

      The atractive, well spoken girl, the one who gets A's in English and who is aiming to go to Oxford, is writing shit like "heres lots gd new ones atm, Wallace n Gromit - every1 shld c that! The Brothers Grimm is also reli reli gd". aa guy in my Chemistry class I talked to, another girl who I attended Astronomy classes with a couple of years back... All of them, coming across as idiots by my measure.

      Perhaps I have come off as an elitist nerd in this post, but what I was really aiming for is to show you that actually, these people who write this stuff on MySpace or whatever are not stupid, they are not really idiots. Its just they have not been taught how important it is to write well on the Web, or how they should act on the web. Hopefully they will be integrated into the older internet community at some point.

    36. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow Norman Rockwell posts on slashdot.

      Seriously, 90% of the old small town industry went the way of the rust belt, and farm employment gets lower every year and is mostly illegal immigrants anyways. The average small US town of 2005 is either lucky to be an exurb or a tourist trap, or is basically filled with a bunch of welfare and social security recipients. Your town is some temporal anomoly from the 1950s.

    37. Re:What Myspace shows by paddyob · · Score: 1

      Check out his "tech-help" webpage!

    38. Re:What Myspace shows by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

      This is a panacea for MySpace. Idiots comprise the largest and most profitable segment that capitalist companies can market to. :-)

      --S

      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    39. Re:What Myspace shows by thelost · · Score: 1

      funny, because it struck me that it's kinda like flesh-life where you meet lots of people, don't get on with most and generally think most people are dull/morons/idiots/jackasses and find a few gems here and there.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    40. Re:What Myspace shows by sat1308 · · Score: 1

      I'm a teenager and I completely agree with you. The kind of music (think Britney & Eminem), books (lol, can't think of anything right now), movies (think American Pie) that teenagers like these days is sick. Not all teenagers are fucking morons. Some of the sensible ones hang out at /. instead of myspace... :)

    41. Re:What Myspace shows by fireweaver · · Score: 1

      Don't sweat it. Kids are a work-in-progress. The vast majority of them will grow up.

    42. Re:What Myspace shows by bechthros · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, please, somebody mod this guy troll. He deserves it.

      I'm 31. When I moved across the country to an area where I knew NOBODY, MySpace helped me meet people with similar interests. MySpace is the only reason I have any friends at all down here (yes, I'm a piss-poor socializer outside of an ASCII environment). The one venue where I've found to play my music on a regular basis down here, I found out about through MySpace. I've gotten some fans for my (unsigned, independant) music through MySpace, as well as become a fan of other unsigned, independant local musicians. I don't have a huge fan base, but thanks to MySpace, if I ever visit Seattle, Canada, Charlotte, Chicago, Orlando, or Texas, there's people who can help me hook up shows. MySpace is how I find out when good local acts are playing (do YOU really wanna wade through ten pages of 5-point type in the back of your free weekly? Me neither). MySpace is the reason people come to see me when I play. If MySpace ever adds the ability to email multiple people without the use of bulletins, it might just replace email for me. All of my friends here, and all of my friends in Milwaukee, and all of my friends in San Francicso, are on it. I need to check my MySpace messages multiple times a day. I only need to check my actual email once every day or two.

      MySpace isn't completely original - it's basically LiveJournal meets Demostreams. But the idea of a multi-featured user community has come a long way since AOL, and it's a concept that's rapidly gaining traction in the marketplace. Slashdot itself is a user-community, just without certain features (music and pictures) and with others (a more specific and exclusive user base). MySpace, Slashdot, Livejournal, Friendster, etc etc are as successful as they are because the marketplace rewards their ideas. Quit bitching about it, come up with a concept as successful as MySpace, and make your own billion dollars.

      Are there problems with MySpace? Sure. The ads are getting more and more intrusive. But if that's your argument against it, you might as well argue against the internet itself. There is plenty of ugly HTML on MySpace. Last time I checked, though, there was also plenty outside of it as well. The servers are getting slower and buggier. But again, MySpace is not unique in this regard - I can't even log into Friendster anymore, it's so slow. And yes, there are a bunch of little kids running around acting like morons. But if this is your argument against it, then you must also be against all IM as well. And, just like Slashdot, there are plenty of people who are idiots - and plenty who aren't. Bottom line, MySpace is very much worth the ZERO DOLLARS I paid to be there.

      If you don't want to use it, that's fine, but don't insult everybody on it without exception. That's just stupid and ignorant.

    43. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't know HTML. They just copy "codes" from elsewhere. The HTML I see on social networking sites, with the exception of Facebook, which doesn't allow user specified HTML, is among the worst I run into on the web.

    44. Re:What Myspace shows by Gryle · · Score: 1

      I don't condone bad English, but it's interesting to look at how online communications like IM and e-mail have developed so rapidly. LOL, BRB, ROFL, RTFA, WTF, all acronyms and expressions not commonly used before the advent of online communications and not widely used outside of it either. I'm generalizing here, but often times email and IM messages between friends are full of bad English, nearly non-sensical phrases and other linguistic nightmares. And amazingly enough we understand what's being communicated to us. So we face the question of whether what we see is bad English or simply a rapid evolution of the English language.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    45. Re:What Myspace shows by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      See, you make too much of an assumption there. They don't know HTML, they search out websites where they can get premade HTML tags / scripts / embeds / whatever, copy and paste, and don't learn anything at all.

    46. Re:What Myspace shows by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      That may be what most of America is, but most Americans don't live there. Even in the most "rural" of states (South Dakota, Iowa, Wyoming, etc), most of the population of the state is within one of the "big cities", even if that city is only 80,000 people. Towns of a thousand people may outnumber cities of a million, but as a portion of total population they're almost irrelevant.

      Oh, and it's collar not "coller". I guess they don't teach spelling in one room school houses in the sticks.

      --
      fuck you.
    47. Re:What Myspace shows by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that hanging out on /. is as sophisticated as you think.

    48. Re:What Myspace shows by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree entirely about the yuppies and hipsters. But it was said somewhat tongue in cheek as I tried to come up with a comparable stereotype for people on Friendster.

      And say what you will about me (you anonymous fucktard), I'm apparently not the only one around here that looks at the profiles on MySpace and thinks the same things based on the other comments here.

      Oh, and if you want to man up and call me an obnoxious prick, I suggest you post with a real account. Or else I'm just going to laugh at you and piss on your face.

    49. Re:What Myspace shows by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I think the same could be said of many older people. You know the ones - the ones who insist on HTML Comic-Sans font emails with top down quoting with pages of past emails and with a massive signature; the ones who fill their webforum posts and IM messages with millions of graphical smilies; the ones who made webpages with blue text on slightly darker blue backgrounds, millions of animGIFs and a MIDI file playing in the background, but forgot to put any content on it; the ones who write letters covered with lots of crappy irrelevant clip art.

      Although just like we blame browsers which invented FONT tags, email clients which invented HTML emails, and webforum software and IM clients which introduced graphical smilies, part of the problem is that MySpace allows such braindead customisations (no thanks, I don't want to have your music blasted out my speakers).

      Another thought is that although I associate the above behaviours with older people too, it's usually people who are less technically minded with computers. Given we usually associate younger people as being more knowledgeable with computers, it's a shame this isn't translating into avoiding all these behaviours of appalling presentation.

    50. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, its like the best of 1995 (Complete with marquee!)

    51. Re:What Myspace shows by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Ah, the good old days. I remember buying "Web Pages for Dummies" when I was in 5th grade (1995) and taught myself HTML while I was at my grandparents' ranch that my parents forced me to go to (my parents were going to deal with some cattle). I got on Geocities a few months later on the Area51 room (I don't remember my address, but I think my name was JediTech) to design the World's Greatest Star Wars Fan Page, but, as 11 year olds are apt to do, I failed.

      It was a great learning experience that moved me from
      10 PRINT "Craig is poopoo"
      20 GOTO 10
      (1st grade)

      to the Python and Gentoo I know and love today. Thank you Geocities, for being the gateway to a Slashdot world!

    52. Re:What Myspace shows by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      I just dont understand how people can think it looks good to have bright pink text and a purple background overlayed with a floating image while forcing you to listen to music and squint past the animations.

      People think it looks good because they made it, and it reflects who they are. It's just an continuation of the usual adolecent identity-formation. The same desire that teenagers have to dress the same way as their friends and decorate their rooms with posters of bands they like extends equally onto the web. They haven't learned to internalize "Who Am I?", so they wear it all outwardly -- who you are is dependent on what you wear, what you listen to, and what your MySpace page looks like. This mostly fades with age, but not entirely. I think most of us carry some amount of adolecent stupidity around with us.

      Facebook will probably never be as bad as MySpace in that regard. College-age kids start to identify more by things that they do or accomplishments than just appearances. It can be just as stupid, but it's at least not as shrill.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    53. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously dude, too much crack.

    54. Re:What Myspace shows by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      >>I'm a piss-poor socializer outside of an ASCII environment

      The parent types using a 7-bit dip switch and memorization of ASCII?

    55. Re:What Myspace shows by deimtee · · Score: 1

      "dotcom"-ming, i guess

      ok. But what are backrounds?

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    56. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are backrounds?

      Ever seen those MySpace-posting females in real life?..

    57. Re:What Myspace shows by DJCF · · Score: 1

      That's how I got started. Then I wanted more control, so I could fine-tune what I was doing. And then the learning started.

    58. Re:What Myspace shows by DJCF · · Score: 1
      That's how I got started. Then I wanted more control, so I could fine-tune what I was doing. And then the learning started.

      No arguement from me about the quality though; its deffinately the worst I come across on the net.

    59. Re:What Myspace shows by JThundley · · Score: 1

      The ads are truly the worst I've ever seen, and I don't ever go to Myspace. So how do I know? My friend was over at my house on his laptop when I heard a Vonage commercial. So I says to the guy, I says I says: "What the fuck are you listenening to? A commercial?" and he replies, "No, I'm on Myspace."

    60. Re:What Myspace shows by metamatic · · Score: 1
      I don't think I can express in words how worried I am at the stupidity of the comming generation.


      I can't see how it can get any worse; after all, Bush got elected, even after his performance in the first term.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    61. Re:What Myspace shows by bechthros · · Score: 1

      They are annoying, but I prefer ads with audio that I can press SKIP on to Salon-style, you-must-watch-this-entire-commercial-before-you-r ead-anything type. If you can't figure out how to hit skip, then... The other day I had a giant ad pop up out of AIM. That was annoying as shit, because you couldn't close it until it ended. That made me think about not using the AIM client... briefly. I've never considered not using myspace because of the ads - you can skip them.

    62. Re:What Myspace shows by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it survived Usenet as well. Whoops. Not supposed to say that out loud... ;)

    63. Re:What Myspace shows by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't you want to meet and befriend or date people that... I don't know... get away from the computer sometimes? (emphasis added)

      Stop. Consider your audience. ;)

    64. Re:What Myspace shows by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I did - but I also considered that there is a wide difference between a bunch of teens and young adults using MySpace as one of those 976 $2.99/min multi-user party lines 24x7 and people who are actually actively doing something on the net (discussing politics, science, technology - or actually creating something like a service - wikipedia.org and so forth).

      Some have and would justify MySpace as "well, at least it's interactive! They're not just watching TV!" but I've seen people use MySpace. I have someone crashing at my place right now who has no job, no money, no place to stay, no anything - but can manage to spend hour after hour after hour on MySpace looking for new people to talk to and hook up with and go out with and they always seem to have money for the bar when they go meet the MySpace groups.

      I've watched these people and I'm not currently convinced that there is any more brain activity going on when using MySpace than there is watching television.

    65. Re:What Myspace shows by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      Well, my post was largely meant to be a joke. Particularly of the "slashdotters don't typically leave their computers"-stereotype variety.

      I've watched these people and I'm not currently convinced that there is any more brain activity going on when using MySpace than there is watching television.

      They're mostly teenagers. There's no brain activity in any case. ;)

    66. Re:What Myspace shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were to surf myspace you would think every teenager on earth is a complete fucking moron.

      s/If you were to surf myspace you would think//g

  6. And they kill themselves online... by croddy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:And they kill themselves online... by Seumas · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Some more of those and MySpace just might win me over!

      Do you know what depresses me? Not so much that kids are increasingly stupid. What depresses me is that the whole empowered future of information and autonomy and exploration and massive self-acquired intellect we always dreamed "the future" would be with the help of technology is for naught. What is the future? A bunch of chubby, self-mutilating, impressionable, commiserating children and creepy old men and uneducated consumer tards who can't think for themselves.

    2. Re:And they kill themselves online... by jZnat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Call me cynical all you wish, but the more myspace fucktards that kill themselves, the better. I'd have to commend this Tom fellow on creating a method to group all the internet's idiots onto one site in order to clean up the mass idiocy elsewhere.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:And they kill themselves online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:And they kill themselves online... by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I guess you can't change human "nature". I learned my lesson, humans are DOOMED!!

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    5. Re:And they kill themselves online... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      They kill themselves online on Usenet too: http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/11/04/suicide.inter net/

      But I don't see people here mocking Usenet in the same way, because Usenet is supposed to be good and useful unlike anything that's come along since, right?

    6. Re:And they kill themselves online... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the same thing. Here we go getting modded down for making pro-suicide and anti-fucktard statements.

    7. Re:And they kill themselves online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This could of ben stoped,"

      sic.

    8. Re:And they kill themselves online... by DanteThePoet · · Score: 1

      See, the difference is the kid on Myspace blew just his brains out on his own. That chick on Usenet actually asked how to do it, and the people there gave her detailed instructions! Myspace is just more mainstream then usenet, and therefore it's going to get alot of publicity compared to UseNet. The kid who killed himself is fucked up, the rest of Myspace isn't nearly that bad.
      Tj-

    9. Re:And they kill themselves online... by millennial · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wonder why.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    10. Re:And they kill themselves online... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Suicide fucking rules. Everybody should have the right to kill themselves. Especially emo kids.

    11. Re:And they kill themselves online... by millennial · · Score: 1

      May the FSM have mercy on you...

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    12. Re:And they kill themselves online... by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

      you're not cynical, you're just an idiot. get over yourself

      --
      -- lol pwned
  7. Wuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    BusinessWeek reports on The MySpace Generation, aka Generation @

    Since when did the MySpace l4mers get op status?

    1. Re:Wuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of them apparently managed to create a channel.

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. There is no "MySpace Generation" by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    There are MySpace users who happen to be young. These people alone do not - quite luckily - constitute a generation just as the large numbers of young Slashdot users aren't a generation.

    They already have a name for this generation: Generation Y/Millenials. We're the ones who grew up with computers and everyone knows it, but apparently BusinessWeek needed an article.

    1. Re:There is no "MySpace Generation" by dogwelder99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the most part, there aren't any "generations" at all. Corporate types have been at this for decades... when a new demographic trend gets strong enough to become a profitable market segment, package it up with a nice easy-to-understand label like "Generation Y", then start blitzing them with messaging telling them how they behave, what they like, and which companies really get them. It's kind of like moving a new product from the early-adopter phase to the mainstream, except you're the product and someone else makes all the money.

    2. Re:There is no "MySpace Generation" by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      And those companies are the late-comers in this case! They get these folks after the school system's had them for 12 or 13 years!

  10. Whose Generation? by yoey · · Score: 3, Funny

    People try to put us d-down (Talkin' 'bout my space)
    Just because we get around (Talkin' 'bout my space)
    Things they do look awful c-c-cold (Talkin' 'bout my space)
    I hope I die before I get old (Talkin' 'bout my space)

    Why don't you all f-fade away (Talkin' 'bout my space)
    And don't try to dig what we all s-s-say (Talkin' 'bout my space)
    I'm not trying to cause a big s-s-sensation (Talkin' 'bout my space)
    I'm just talkin' 'bout my g-g-g-generation (Talkin' 'bout my space)

    This is my space
    This is my space, baby

    1. Re:Whose Generation? by mlarios · · Score: 1

      you're a few syllables off...

    2. Re:Whose Generation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean:

      ppl try 2 put us d-down (talkin' 'bout my space)
      just coz we get round (talkin' 'bout my space)
      thinks do look awfull c-c-culd (talkin' 'bout my space)
      i hope I di fore i get old (talkin' 'bout my space)

      y dont u all f-faide away (talkin' 'bout my space)
      an dont try 2 dig wat we all s-s-say (talkin' 'bout my space)
      im not tryng 2 couse a big s-s-enzasion (talkin' 'bout my space)
      im just talkin' 'bout my g-g-g-genarasion (Talkin' 'bout my space)

      tHiS iS mY sPaCe
      ThIs Is My SpAce, baby

      XXXOOOXXXOOO LOL wuv ~+aNgUl-WiNgZ+~ ^_____^

    3. Re:Whose Generation? by yoey · · Score: 1

      Very good....

  11. This is nothing new by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1
    The same thing happened after the Columbine killers were discovered to have had AOL homepages. Sadly, I didn't think to archive their stuff until it was almost too late, but I still saved a lot of it. I wasn't the compulsive archiver then that I am now.

    OT, but the reason that I don't care as much about these two as I did about those two is that this seems to be a pretty standard love crime, whereas that was a school shooting that came within a hair of being an order of magnitude worse. Also, I study fringe religions, so I wanted to go through their stuff and see if there was any religious connection like there'd been a few years earlier at OK City. Turned out there wasn't much of one, but I couldn't have discovered that without saving the material before reading it. In some cases I was literally minutes ahead of whoever was shutting the sites down.

    --

    Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    1. Re:This is nothing new by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you consider the GNAA a "fringe religion"?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:This is nothing new by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Do you have that material mirrored in a publicy-accessible location somewhere? I'd like to look at it myself - more out of morbid curiosity than anything else, admittedly, but I never understood the whole "let's remove every trace that these guys ever existed" craze.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    3. Re:This is nothing new by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1

      IMO, no. They're more like the Discordians, who have many professed adherents but few (if any) true believers. (That's the extent of the similarities, though. The Discordians are vastly more clever...and that's true no matter what you think of the Discordians.) They're more like a club than a cult, the key difference being that you leave the former every evening and return home.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    4. Re:This is nothing new by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1

      No, but drop me an e-mail and I'll send you everything but bomb-making stuff, if there was any. I don't think there was, but I just wanted to be up front about that.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    5. Re:This is nothing new by slavemowgli · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thanks. Can you send it to oil3c4glz2@spambob.net? Sorry about the spam trap email, but with the amount of spam I'm getting (around 800 messages a day, currently), I'd rather not post my real email address in a public forum where it could be harvested. ^_~

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  12. I never got the fascination with by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Generation whatever articles. It seems they always want to neatly compartmentalize people's behavior by their age group though I know 40+ years old totally connected to the net and that my teenage nephews who hardly go on or know anything about it.

    The article seems to be treating all this stuff as new when much of it's been around for a good while. Next, they will be gushing about how people use newfangled email over snailmail. The only message here is that people tend to communicate with the best medium for them which is nothing new.

    1. Re:I never got the fascination with by greenrd · · Score: 1
      I never get the fascination with Generation whatever articles.

      Marketers love demographics (rightly or wrongly). Remember, marketers are the real customers of news media. The media exist today primarily to sell eyeballs to advertisers.

  13. End of Humanity by yamcha666 · · Score: 0

    If the users of MySpace are the future of humanity, God help us all. :-\

  14. Not just MySpace by queenb**ch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other on line communities with less restrictive requirements are springing up and gaining ground on MySpace. Frankly, I find the whole eletronic thing to be a bit frightening. Hear me out before you mod me down! Nothing digital happens without leaving traces. As the public library in Philadelphia who's fighting with the FBI over one of their "Letters of National Security". It becomes all too easy to obtain records of who did what and who said what. Anonymity is a big part of what makes the internet go 'round and if you take that away, all you have left is what we have in real space now. A bunch of folks with ideas but too afraid to voice them.

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:Not just MySpace by gatzke · · Score: 1


      There has really been very little internet anonymity. If you do illegal stuff, your ISP will be able to hunt you down generally. They have even opened up anonymous remailers. Sure, find an open wireless access point and you may be online, but your MAC gets sent along with whatever you do. Cash access in an internet cafe is about as anonymous as you could get, except for all the closed-circuit cameras in public places.

      Never expect anything online to be private. People don't get that. The internet is a very public place. If you are really nuts, you can try and encrypt everything but you still aren't tempest proof. You have no privacy online.

  15. Not My Space by XBL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use MySpace regularly, mostly to meet chicks in my area (and it doesn't work all that well, but it's free), but I don't trust the site to hold a lot of formal personal information about me; just informal stuff.

    Fox purchased MySpace, and I wish it was someone else like Google. The site is a mess with all sorts of useability and performance problems. It would be nice if someone just setup a good new framework for it, and then "imported" everyone's crap into it. The current MySpace framework is like some student's school project grown out-of-control. Maybe it is.

    So anyways, it's really 'Not My Space' for a lot of people. Just a place to waste time. I wouldn't expect it to become somemore more than that.

    1. Re:Not My Space by XBL · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot about the insane music band part of the site. Most band profiles are just fans postings and then a link to the band's website. I am always getting spammed by unknown bands want to be my 'friend'. Decline, decline, decline.

    2. Re:Not My Space by bbkingadrock · · Score: 1

      you can disable band invitations in your personal settings

    3. Re:Not My Space by ZenShadow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The site is a mess with all sorts of useability and performance problems. It would be nice if someone just setup a good new framework for it, and then "imported" everyone's crap into it.


      If you wrote such a system and offered it to myspace, they'd probably pay big bucks for it. But it would have to handle more traffic than even Slashdot does, do it well, and manage tens of terabytes of data without falling over. And that's just for the user profiles... Then you've got the groups, the music, the mail system, ...

      I love listening to people who have never built a massive web site before saying how "someone should just do it right". When you build a system and it explodes 1000x faster than you could possibly predict, it's hard to keep up with. Even when you build it correctly and manage to anticipate your traffic loads, serving that number of complex pages is no laughing matter and causes a lot of people to work a LOT of long hours.

      --S (yes, I've done this before.)
      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    4. Re:Not My Space by XBL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good post, and I know what you mean. That is why it would probably take someone like Google to pull it off correctly. I sure can't do it :-P Nor can Fox.

    5. Re:Not My Space by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Fox purchased MySpace, and I wish it was someone else like Google.

      Why would Google buy myspace? It already has Friendster. The content you see on myspace probably wouldn't fly as well on Google, which may be changing in the next few months as they fight it out.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    6. Re:Not My Space by bobobobo · · Score: 1
      I use MySpace regularly, mostly to meet chicks in my area (and it doesn't work all that well, but it's free)

      Speak for yourself. I don't use it to meet girls, but it is a welcome side effect. It's a more casual atmosphere than typical dating sites, and allows you to create degrees of separation between people in an easier fashion, then well just about anything really. So you find you have mutual friends and the like or went to the same school or whatever.

    7. Re:Not My Space by Duwke · · Score: 1

      Not meaning to be "that guy", but your site http://www.triwizard.net/ looks down :-)

    8. Re:Not My Space by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've been meaning to restore that particular vserver for, like, a year now. This is what happens when there are better things to do than maintain a personal web site. :-)

      --S

      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    9. Re:Not My Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah Blah.

      "Having FAILED to acquire Friendster last year, Google was under some media ..."

      Top search result in google for "google friendster". The news is from January 2004! Verify before you claim.

  16. Re:MySpace + Blogs = Proof that we need a Holocaus by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Goatse.cx alert in that link above.

  17. Its just more visible by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Teenagers ARE fucking morons.
    When i was a teen, i also heard trashy music, also had cheesy jet-fighter posters in my room and wasnt known for my social skills. And the others in my class werent better, either.

    The only thing thats different is that with the internet, occasionally older non-parent people stumble upon this stuff, which just didnt happen before the internet.
    I am sure if you go offline to an event thats REALLY in in the 12-15 age group, you wouldnt find a much different picture. But you wouldnt go there, while online, its just a click away...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Its just more visible by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why the hell is this modded "4, Insightful"? Teenagers are not "fucking morons" and the parent has offered no proof of his claim of such other than his own retardation as a teenager. Just because he was stupid in his teen years doesn't make all teens ever so, or even a majority!

      The parent is a troll.

    2. Re:Its just more visible by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "When i was a teen, i also heard trashy music, also had cheesy jet-fighter posters in my room and wasnt known for my social skills. And the others in my class werent better, either."

      So, things haven't changed that much, have they? Except that the posters are in your parents basement.

    3. Re:Its just more visible by Buran · · Score: 1

      And what, pray tell, is wrong with photos of fighter aircraft? I'm 30 and I still love good ones. But at least I can spell...

    4. Re:Its just more visible by noamsml · · Score: 2, Informative
      With all due lack of respect, I want to contest your claim. By using one example, you conclude about a whole set of people. Needless to say, you are wrong. I could show proof, but I don't need to, your claim is inherently wrong, since you start with an outlandish claim and provide as proof only one example.

      I mean, sure, many teenagers may be fucking morons, but then again, somehow I remember that it was another age group who re-elected the president that went to a war of favoritism in which we could not possibly win. And since I am a teenager, I can tell you that many of the teenagers I see, including those who may seem like fucking morons, have depth of their own. Fucking moronedness is more in the judgements of the observer than in the mind of the observed.

      And frankly, taste in music or clothes does not determine one's fucking moronedness, it is more a matter of weather they care about things that are significant in life, taste in music not being one of them.

      In fact, I think that, a student being randomly chosen, it is more likeley than not that he or she will not be a fucking moron. Sure, I know a few people in my sphere of social reference whome I may consider fucking morons, but one does not taint the group. I also know many teenage activists, many people who have interesting things to say, who know what they're doing and why.

    5. Re:Its just more visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yeah, that reminds me. . .

      Teens are also full of fucking angst, self-pity, and delusions of persecution and gender warfare.

    6. Re:Its just more visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was 16 I knew what an apostrophe was.

      ac

    7. Re:Its just more visible by GoofyBoy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >Teenagers are not "fucking morons"

      They are morons.

      As you grow older you change and you grow wiser and you learn from your past mistakes.

      I hope that in 10 years from now I can look back and see what idiotic mistakes I made and learn from them.

      If you don't think that you were a moron during your teenage years, well then you are just an older moron.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    8. Re:Its just more visible by noamsml · · Score: 1
      yep, because obviously that reflects in what I wrote.Now to your checklist:

      Agnst: sometimes, but then again, you must admit that people of all ages might get deeply depressed once in a while. Self-pity: not really, I am too well aware of the fact that other people have it worse. Delusions of persecution: No, not really. Gender warfare: what is that? to remind you, we are talking about people 14-16, not about 11-12.

    9. Re:Its just more visible by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      They're also very insecure and tend to lash out at others who demonstrate traits that they themselves have and hate. ... What were you saying again?

  18. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 15 and I've never heard of it. What does that mean?

  19. Old Ideas by SteevR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that this guy was the first to postulate that interconnectedness would change culture irrevocably in the near-future timeframe either. But I think the essay linked above cuts a little closer to the core issue; Businessweek just now caught on to what has been a rolling snowball in the internet world for what, 4 years now?

    --
    Performing sanity checks on your own beliefs is vital in avoiding poisoned koolaid.
  20. Summary of the MSNBC article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you kill two people, your MySpace page will get soo many hits, and a lot of spam in the comments. I just saved you three pages of sappy journalism.

  21. Fail. by ImaNihilist · · Score: 2, Funny

    MySpace is the worst thing to happen to the internet since it's inception. Think of the bandwidth! OH THE HUMANITY!!

    1. Re:Fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, I think AOL is the worst thing that happened to the internet. myspace might rank 2nd or third, behind possibly xanga or something like that.

  22. Its time to let go... by adolfojp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am 26. When people my age were kids they had TV. Television is a one way medium where people are told how to look , how to talk, how to think. Think of the MTV generation.

    Today, at last, kids have a better freedom of the press than we did. They can give back to the system instead of just listening silently. And they have so many more channels to chose from, some made by their peers instead of by the big media corporations.

    What they say will be childish, stupid and uninformed. Just like the things we used to say when we were their age. But at least they will have an outlet to do so.

    I drink to the @ generation. And to the generation before, thank you for making this possible.

    Cheers,
    Adolfo

    PS. Remember when using computers was social suicide?

    1. Re:Its time to let go... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      "PS. Remember when using computers was social suicide?"

      Hey I resent that! All 0 of my friends locally agree and all my +18 friends online agree.

    2. Re:Its time to let go... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm just a little older than you and you are understimating the idiotastic power of compound stupidity. When you and I were kids, the stupidity was compounded by ourselves and a small handful of friends. Now, it's compounded by the hundreds of people on your "myspace" list or whatever they use to interconnect people along with all the random people that stumble along and talk with you. And at least we didn't have middle aged perverts trying to pick up on us via email and our pages trying to take advantage of the fact that we're insecure and deprived of daddy's attention and spending all of our time on the internet because we can't face real people and eventually hook up with said creepy old dude.

      No good can come of harnessing the vast resource of stupidity.

    3. Re:Its time to let go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What they say will be childish, stupid and uninformed. Just like the things we used to say when we were their age. But at least they will have an outlet to do so."

      You are 26... You are still in that 'baby' age...

      I am much older than most /.ers, when I was 26, I was married, busting my a$$ to pay the mortgage...

      Most 26 yo I see now live with mommy & daddy and stand in line buying xboxes and crap...

    4. Re:Its time to let go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replying to my own post, but WTH...

      The scary thing to me is the lack of shame anymore...

      When I was mid 20's (early '90s) if you still lived at home, it was an embarrasing thing to admit...

      Now, it is business as usual... sighh.....

    5. Re:Its time to let go... by adolfojp · · Score: 1

      The phenomenom that you are describing is actually well documented. They are called twixters. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twixter

    6. Re:Its time to let go... by Jambon · · Score: 1
      I am much older than most /.ers, when I was 26, I was married, busting my a$$ to pay the mortgage...

      I'll give this much: people are growing up slower. It used to be that you'd be married right out of high school and go straight into the workforce. Now, after high school many more people are going into college, thus prolonging their entrance into the workforce. Being married, having a job, AND going to school would be one hell of a stressful time (we're talking undergrad here, in grad school you could work it out). In college, the things people have to do are still handed to them, much as they were in high school. The responsibilities of adulthood aren't forced onto them as they used to be.

      Most 26 yo I see now live with mommy & daddy and stand in line buying xboxes and crap...

      Who are these people? I don't know that many 26 year olds who are living with their parents. If they are, they're probably in college, even though most people I know won't stay at home even if their parents live in the same city as their college.

  23. Studies regarding such sites? by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's widely known that sites such as MySpace and the forums at GameFAQs.com are "infested" with teens who would appear to lack basic textual communication skills.

    Have any researchers who study education performed reviews of such sites? How do such children and teens perform in high school? Is their inability to write sensibly only exhibited online, or does it also creep into their school work?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely they don't succeed in school. That is why this country is getting dumber. As people grow up being less and less educated their kids will be even worse than them, until we have either another stone age or just a country full of people without the slightest clue about anything.

    2. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      >Is their inability to write sensibly only exhibited online, or does it also creep into their school work?

      I am sad to say, but it has seeped into their school work. I'm thankful that MS Word et al. will at least auto-correct most inherant butcherings of the english language, but I've seen some of the worse piles of shit written on fellow students' papers. I noticed this a year or so ago when we did peer editting; seeing the all too common AOLer speak in persuasive essays and short stories has killed me a little inside each time.

      And I think you're forgetting about GameSpot, IGN, 1up, Bungie, Penny Arcade, Steam, and nearly every video game forum in existance when it comes to godawful grammar and rapings of the english language.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by Morgon · · Score: 1

      I recall reading an article about a year ago (it may have even been on Slashdot) about the abyssmal writing skills our children have, where they would literally type 'u' and 'r' into their school assignments, and wonder why they were failing.

      With computing becoming an increasingly prominant part of our lives, I wonder if we should be teaching typing skills right alongside cursive (that's a style of writing created with pencil and paper, for those not familiar ;) ) - The reason why 'u' and 'r' started appearing was mostly because of the speed issue. Two extra letters may not seem a big deal for us, but for someone who does not primarily use a computer (or spend too much time browsing MySpace instead of writing in it), it may very well take an extra 30 to 60 seconds to find.

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    4. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      I'm thankful that MS Word et al. will at least auto-correct most inherant butcherings really? i'm of the opinion that this is part of the problem. i'm 29, and i didn't use a computer to write a paper until college. the only spell check i knew was me reading over my paper before turning it in. i think autocorrect type features (grammar and spelling) make people lazy. i think they're a great tool, if used correctly, and i do use them when typing up formal written pieces. for posting on the internet, or using im, i tend to ignore capital letters, and minor spelling mistakes.

    5. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well coming from a C student who is now 29 but used bbs's compuserver and aol (before it sucked) I get your point.... bows head down... I am a member of myspace. :-(

    6. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by miyako · · Score: 1

      You know, I hear a lot of people say this, and while I have no direct first hand experience with it, I'm inclined to beleive it probably happens. I suspect that a lot of this is caused by the fact that IM, message boards, etc. are something between spoken conversation and writing.
      Traditionally, even non-formal writing has been a great deal more formal than conversation, for the fact that when you were writing something, due to the nature of the medium for communication, you had to think about what you wanted to say, write it down, and make sure that the other person could understand it.
      Most people do not want to write a letter to someone, and get a letter back a few weeks that just says "what?". Indeed, I think that most people would not even bother answering a letter if it were incoherent enough that they would have to write back requesting explanation.
      The same thing applies even moreso to papers, articles, and books. Nobody would write a book and not bother to correct glaring omissions or unclear chapters, and the author most certainly would not expect a majority of readers to compose letters responding to points in the book, and for the author to compose replies to those letters. Let alone to send out copies of all correspondences regarding the book to everyone who has read to book so that everyone can keep up on the developments of the ideas in the book as prompted by the communications of readers.
      With email, IM, and Blogs though, it's perfectly acceptable to omit ideas or to be unclear, because communication is cheap and instantaneous.
      In other words, with the Internet, the audience has moved from being a passive target to a living and interactive body of people, and even the published word is mutable, changed or appended with ease.
      What it comes down to then, I think, is that a lot of the problems with peoples writing stems not from a complete inability to write (I think people today are probably better writers than in the last 50 or 100 years, simply because they write so much more often), but in the inability to accurately determine their target audience, and conceive of a target audience wich is completely non-interactive with the author.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    7. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by The+boojum · · Score: 1

      The reason why 'u' and 'r' started appearing was mostly because of the speed issue.

      I've always found the speed argument silly and selfish. Sure it might be slightly faster for the writer to omit letters that are technically redundant from an information theory perspective, but it cost each and every reader more time to "decode" the message. For something that's going to be read by a number of people, the aggregate time savings to everyone is net negative. I've always felt it to be truely selfish and lazy on the part of the writer and shows no consideration for the readers. If the writer doesn't have time to draft a proper message, maybe they shouldn't be posting.

      But maybe I'm just a curmudgeon who'd rather see people use the extra time it takes to write properly to think through what they're saying.

    8. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      You're arguing that people should user proper English on the Interne because it's for the greater good? If everyone thought like that, communism might would work. The fact is, most people don't think like that.

      I totally agree with you though. Typing an extra couple of letters is not hard. I wonder if there is a correlation between Internet speak and literacy. Are literate people less likely to use Internet speak? Does the use of Internet speak impair literacy in children? Intuition says Yes and Yes, but I'd be interested seeing studies confirm these guesses.

    9. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      A study on how well do Slashdot trolls perform at school/work would be interesting too...

    10. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by The+boojum · · Score: 1
      You're arguing that people should user proper English on the Interne because it's for the greater good? If everyone thought like that, communism might would work. The fact is, most people don't think like that.

      Nah. Nothing so esoteric as that. Just simple courtesy to your fellow man, that's all. That's how most etiquette originated: trying to save each other a bit of trouble. It worked, too, once upon a time.

      /misses netiquette.

    11. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by Zellis · · Score: 1
      it cost each and every reader more time to "decode" the message.

      The way things are going, the next generation won't have an issue decoding netspeak, but they might have to pause to translate words like "are" and "you" into "r" and "u" so they can understand it.

    12. Re:Studies regarding such sites? by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

      when did high school performance matter for anything but getting into college?

      anyway, who gives a shit if some kids you obviously have no interest in talking to don't type the way you do?

      --
      -- lol pwned
  24. I was going to post on this article by Razor+Sex · · Score: 2, Funny

    but I had to go check my MySpace.

  25. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by m85476585 · · Score: 1

    Oh, And I've never used IM.

  26. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That you belong on Slashdot.

  27. Actually, no. by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It would not appear to be a case of "GNU/Freedom".

    If Netcraft is correct, then it would appear that MySpace is run on Windows systems.

    http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/graph?site=www.myspa ce.com

    They're even using IIS, so it's quite likely that there is absolutely no open source or FSF software powering their site.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Actually, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loser

  28. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    In South Korea, only old people use MySpace...

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  29. Myspace - adverts suck by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Try http://tribe.net/ instead. Far more configurable, doesn't crash every 2 mins and the advertising is less intrusive...

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Myspace - adverts suck by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Great place for porn too

    2. Re:Myspace - adverts suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a closet myspace whore (hence posting as an AC) - but I have adblock/filterset.g in Firefox, and it's great when myspace tries to show me a full page flash game/adverstisement that would probably send me into seizures, but instead I get an awkward white page - the cleanest page available on the site.

      As far as myspace on a whole goes - it's Geocities all over again. Except now the kiddies have (very, very, very, very badly coded) CSS and mp3s instead of clipart, gifs, and embedded looping midis. And for some reason everybody always has the same eight or so camera angle shots - the "bathroom mirror" shot, the "wide angle" shot, the "dramatic I'm-not-looking-into-the camera" shot, the "all you can see is my eye" shot, etc.

    3. Re:Myspace - adverts suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? In 15 minutes, you can write your very own blog engine in Ruby on Rails. :)

    4. Re:Myspace - adverts suck by Animats · · Score: 1
      Tribe is fun, especially if you're in SF.

      The biggest problem with Tribe is that you can't merge old tribes, and it's easy to create new tribes. So you end up with near-duplicate tribes and heavy cross-posting. You keep seeing the same postings over and over in different tribes.

    5. Re:Myspace - adverts suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "all you can see is my eye" shot

      Also known as the "fat girl shot"

  30. Why not the Internet Generation? by Fuzzlekits · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I really don't care to consider myself part of any generation whose title is that of a fox owned sell-out conglomerate. I think that while there are valid applications of the technology and success stories, myspavce is a hot topic type site. I don't mean to bash people for using it, but it seems, from my experience, that the place is, on the whole, not unlike AOL - Internet for the rest of the world, especially teenagers who don't neccessarily consort with anyone they don't know IRL.

    Of course, I also think that the people on IMs who only have local people on their lists have no respect for the medium.. I had friends that nonchalantly logged into other people's accounts to propagate lies, create fights and stir tensiosn up, with the whole thing being a joke they can clear up with a face to face meeting... Some of us with friends on other continents don't have that luxury, and I don't appreciate that sort of immaturity. Not that that's everyone of course, just one example of why (what seems to me) a vast majority of teengers who just use the net to talk with local friends may not respect the medium as much as those who do use it to create a smaller world.

    On a more positive note, I can foresee one thin coming from myspace that oculd have a huge impact on the net as a whole. Blogging is a huge topic right now.. and, in some ways, part of the popularity of blogs might be pinned on things like Livejournals. While occasionally used for the typical teen angsting and drama that we may not consider an advantage to society, the sort of wide teenage base acceptance of these might have led to more acceptance of the 'True' blogs that sprang up afterwords. Maybe Myspace will spawn something simmilar, in the sense of another generation of large, widely used communities. After all, if myspace's layout does offer some advantage or revolution, I'd hate to think that Murdoch is making money off of it.

  31. God I hate myspace by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason I still use it is because my friends there use it more than lj or other communities.

    I try to filter as many friends requests as possible to those who are older 23+. But still I see comments like "OMG ... would u sooo do the person above me.." and other silly bulletins that I could not give a shit at all about.

    I would leave if I could. I guess I need more real life friends closer to home and less online.

    1. Re:God I hate myspace by tooth · · Score: 1
      I would leave if I could. I guess I need more real life friends closer to home and less online.

      Well, you pretty much gave your own answer there. How do you think you make IRL friends? By spending time with people, going out with them, doing things with them, getting to know them and they you. If you keep going back to online friends then that's all you end up having. It's a balance between IRL and online. A good way to start is get involve with local events that you would enjoy, like LUGs or LANs. It takes practice but I'm sure you'll get the hang of it.

    2. Re:God I hate myspace by tooth · · Score: 1
      btw, if you have trouble get a copy of How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie. It really helped me to talk to people I didn't know very well.

      Here's a summary: http://www.westegg.com/unmaintained/carnegie/win-f riends.html

    3. Re:God I hate myspace by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      but .. but?

      Then I would have to leave my computer and home??

      Scary.

  32. Matrix... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    You know, articles like this and the increasing trend to live our lives virtually makes me wonder if one day society would end up in a Matrix like environment VOLUNTARILY! I'm surprised cyber cafes haven't evolved to the point where they can accomodate several day stays. A cyber-hotel if you will. Ultimate computer setups, comfortable lighting, convenient bathrooms and food near your computer, and as much or as little in person socialization as you want. You may want to be alone, or be with your friends/guild.

    If only there were a way to make it cheap enough for it to be feasible...

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Matrix... by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Dude....why the fuck would you even want that to be a reality?! Thats...sick...

    2. Re:Matrix... by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      If we ever manage to invent a matrix-like (or holodeck-like) immersive interface, I really think it will be the end of the species. We will simply stop having children, like Pandas that won't screw to save their species. If a person can just program up a companion or sex partner, or even just participate in anonymous sex using disposable avatars (as people do in Second Life), I really doubt many will do anything else. Obviously it will depend on the quality of the illusion, but many will prefer a reality of their own creation to actual reality with all its compromise and strife.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Matrix... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't been to Japan, then. Cyber cafes (Manga-kisa) over there provide, in exchange for a (usually small) hourly fee, not only access to an internet-connected computer, but access to a large media library (these places evolved from Manga cafes), some type of inexpensive food and beverage, and very commonly, your own little private cubicle, large enough to sleep in!

      Some even have showers and actual beds.

      These places are also nominally open twenty-four hours.

      It's not uncommon for someone who has missed the last train home to rent out a cubicle in one of these places for the night, because it's a lot cheaper to buy six or eight hours of sleep at seven hundred yen per hour than it is to pay for a ten-thousand-yen per-night business hotel.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  33. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it means that you are fucking lucky to not know this shit.

  34. Reminds me of 2ch..... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2ch (2 channel) is a Japanese forum (more similar to slashdot then typical forums) that has over 10 million members from all different walks of life (not mainly teenagers like myspace). There is a US variant (an imitation not related directly or anywhere near as popular) 4ch that gives a good idea of the format. It's an interesting concept due to it's broadness in topics and people who use it. Although myspace seems to be pretty popular with people who aren't computer experts.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  35. It's not the stupidity that matters. by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It does not matter that many are stupid. That has always been true. The problem is their involvement with society as a whole.

    Traditionally, those who lacked intellect found work in the manufacturing sector. But these days most manufacturing in the US has been moved to Asia, South or Central America, and Africa.

    Now it's been reported that Ford will close a number of North American plants. If I recall correctly, GM made a similar decision recently. Those were amongst the last remaining major manufacturers in the US.

    What we will see is a movement of the stupid from the manufacturing jobs which no longer exist to the service jobs. So yes, you probably will have to deal with those sort of people more often, at least for a little while. But an economy cannot survive long on services alone. Manufactured, tangible goods are required for strong economic growth.

    As for the future of an economy without manufactures, it's difficult to predict the outcome.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      What we will see is a movement of the stupid from the manufacturing jobs which no longer exist to the service jobs.

      You mean the people that work in service jobs today aren't the stupid ones? They get worse?!

      I know - there are a lot of service-job people who are intelligent and do great work, but for every person like that there are fifty who thinks "extra pickle" on a burger means "two pickles instead of one" or think "extra pickle - no tomato" means "a folded brown paper bag on the side of the tray" (I shit you not about that last one - twice at Burger King I've asked for extra pickles on my burger and the person just gave me a brown paper bag).

    2. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      The trend towards a service oriented economy has started since the 1780's when the government began looking at percentages of jobs. Its nothing new.

      Manufactoring came and gone and farming is still going down from the one %88 of all jobs during the 18th century.

      I think the idea of nafta is ludacrious. Money always supposed to move in massive quantities as fast as possible to blow up the GDP in any given nation. Now to satisfy a few billionaires we have leaks where money is flowing from our balloon overseas in the hope that their gdp balloons may grow and they somehow *mught* buy our products. It doesn't make economic sense.

      If someone is making 1/3 the amount of an American then that person will consume alot less. Dont give me the argument for things are cheaper in India. Housing yes, but a honda civic is the same price as one here and so is a dell computer.

      The MPC or marginal prospensity to consume is much lower for the wealthy who benefit from nafta as they put their money into savings and it does not trickle back to create more jobs.

      We need protectionism now if we want to protect our future.

    3. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by dada21 · · Score: 1

      We need protectionism now if we want to protect our future.

      No, we need truly free trade. Unions and protectionism (tariffs, etc) killed our manufacturing sector.

      If labor plus shipping from China is cheaper than labor here, wages need to drop for the now-commodity item. Decades of protecting the steel industry cost the US billions in higher building and vehicle prices.

      If we increase our tariffs we'll bankrupt even faster.

    4. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      But the wages which would drop would be ours.

      Not to mention the lack of spending by laid off workers would hit our employers pocketbook.

    5. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by noamsml · · Score: 1

      Oh, you are talking about the wages about the workers who have no health care, barely make it past the month. How nice to see a geek sitting on his throne of expensive technology, claiming we need to lower the wages of people who barely make it past the month, not to talk about affording expensive technology.(Ad hominem, but still...)

    6. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      You mean the people that work in service jobs today aren't the stupid ones?

      *ring ring*

      "Hello, McDonalds, how can I help you?"

      "This is ummm... the police. Yeah, the police. I want to you to illegally detain, stripsearch, and sexually assault one of your staff. And just in case you were wondering, this really is the police."

      "OK!"

    7. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by zzz1357 · · Score: 1
      We need protectionism now if we want to protect our future.

      I think by "protect[ing] our future" the previous poster meant "continuing our tradition of protectionsim."

      --
      You can't add pianos and telephones.
    8. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the crack that matters.

    9. Re:It's not the stupidity that matters. by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      That was Burger King.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
  36. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by Gyga · · Score: 1

    I'm 15 and wish I hadn't, it is all everyone talks about.

    Be glad you haven't before now.

    --
    I don't preview or spellcheck.
  37. Myspacewhaa? by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    I spend about as many hours a day on line as I can, perhaps 10+ except the days I'm working, and I've never heard of myspace.com.

    But yes, there is a definite bunch of people who are in the know about things on line.

    In my age group, it was quite rare to have grown up around computers, and you can definetly tell the difference between me and my girlfriend. Though she is no technofobe or luddite, she has trouble with coming to grips with computers and technology some times. This can be easily seen in us slightly under 30 year olds, there are those who can and those who have to struggle to do so -not to mention the real computer haters who want to have nothing to do with the devils spawn.

    The younger ones are an altogether different bunch, a huge majority of them are growing up with computers from the beginning. And waaaay better ones with so much more to do. I grew up around Olivettis with floppies and telnet!

    Talk about a deprived childhood.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  38. What the hell?. by js92647 · · Score: 1

    I am adding BusinessWeek to my blocked site list.

    a) MySpace Generation

    Appearantly these guys have created a whole new fad/culture/generation simply by posting ominious, useless blogs all over a website. I have to say, MySpace would only be good if we could have more Suicide entries. That last one kept some of my friends up all night trying not to laugh. They can take a pat on the back for what they've made; but let's face it: Where are people like Maddox? I don't see a "Slashdot Generation" either being mentioned in the news, filled with "1. something 2. ???? 3. profit!!!" entries.

    b) Promotional companies

    It's kind of sad to see how far some companies (as mentioned in the article: Coca-Cola) to 'promote' their products through use of these .. "myspace users".

    I think the _only_ reason this was created was because that kid killed himself. I am still laughing. Fucking brilliant. Kind of funny sometimes to see in how many ways you can construct the word "attention whore" and attach a modern-day occurence to it.

    I am slowly awaiting a suicide on LiveJournal, followed by more articles from the media entitled "LiveJournal Jeneration" (note the J)

    1. Re:What the hell?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am slowly awaiting a suicide on LiveJournal, followed by more articles from the media entitled "LiveJournal Jeneration" (note the J)

      Infamous Slashdot page-widener/troll Klerck posted a suicide note on LiveJournal before killing himself. Some of the LJ users actually egged him on. Sadly, the only "media" that gave any coverage of his suicide were the fags on trolltalk.

  39. Google owns orkut, a competitor to myspace by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Invite only... What's an orkut invite worth these days?

    Again... http://tribe.net/ better.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Google owns orkut, a competitor to myspace by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      Invite only... What's an orkut invite worth these days?

      Eighty-nine US cents.
  40. Re:MySpace + Blogs = Proof that we need a Holocaus by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Not to mention his profile URL is a vandalized Michael Newdow article. A typical loser troll...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  41. The Myspace generation ... by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and you thought AOL was the worst it could get!

    --
    I am Spartacus
  42. But they reserve the right... by ArghBlarg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to change the TOS at any time, unilaterally (from Section 2):

    "Even after membership is terminated, this Agreement will remain in effect, including sections 4, 5, 7 and 9-14. MySpace.com's Terms of Use and/or subscription fees that were provided to you at registration may change from time to time. By using the Service and by becoming a Member, you acknowledge that MySpace.com reserves the right to charge for the Service and has the right to terminate a Member's Membership should Member breach this Agreement or fail to pay for the Service, as required by this Agreement."

    So who says they won't "pull the trigger" and try to claim rights (even retroactively)?

    Hmm... so what's to say they won't suddenly change Section 5 to say "exclusive, in perpetuity rights to all material, even after you leave My Space"? If your novel/mp3/scientific breakthrough is online when they make the change to the TOS, it'll already be too late.

    I'm not saying they'd necessarily do this, but it's possible. Better to keep your stuff off of Fox's servers. :-p

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
    1. Re:But they reserve the right... by lustforlike · · Score: 1

      Virtually every server that allows users to post original material has similar terms of service. It is not about trying to claim rights over the users' material, it is about preventing users from suing them.

      When it comes down to it, though, if you're worried about someone stealing your work, you'd be foolish to post it anywhere online.

    2. Re:But they reserve the right... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's stupid. it would take about 5 minutes or less for the judge to throw out the claims of exclusive license from the amended terms. also you cannot transfer copyright without a WRITTEN AGREEMENT.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:But they reserve the right... by mildgift · · Score: 1
      Virtually every server that allows users to post original material has similar terms of service. It is not about trying to claim rights over the users' material, it is about preventing users from suing them.

      HAHAHAHAHAH. You really believe that?

      If they didn't want to be sued, they would have written something like: by posting something on MySpace, you agree that you will not sue MySpace for distributing your material via these methods... (and list methods), and indemnify MySpace against any lawsuits resulting from anything MySpace does with your goodies.

    4. Re:But they reserve the right... by lustforlike · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe a company like Fox thinks it is economic to steal anything someone posts to MySpace? They'd spend more than they'd make just to find something worth stealing. I would like to know of any cases where this kind of abuse of license has actually happened.

    5. Re:But they reserve the right... by MikeWasHere05 · · Score: 0
      Before you go around bashing a certain site's TOS, please read the TOS of the site that you are currently on.

      http://www.ostg.com/terms.htm
      OSTG reserves the right, at OSTG's sole discretion, to change, modify, add or remove portions of these Terms periodically.

      etc.
    6. Re:But they reserve the right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... so what's to say they won't suddenly change Section 5 to say "exclusive, in perpetuity rights to all material, even after you leave My Space"? If your novel/mp3/scientific breakthrough is online when they make the change to the TOS, it'll already be too late.

      Any halfway decent contract lawyer would tear through a power grab like that like it was tissue paper. And they would take the case for free just to get a shot at Fox's meaty backside.

    7. Re:But they reserve the right... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Do you really believe a company like Fox thinks it is economic to steal anything someone posts to MySpace

      Er, pretty much this has already happened. If you read Slashdot recently, you'd have noticed that in the UK, the Mail, the Sun (part of the same parent company as Fox), and the Guardian have all been caught plagiarising from blogs. MySpace hosts blogs. QED.

      They'd spend more than they'd make just to find something worth stealing.

      They would not search the blogs in alphabetical order, they would pick up the good ones via reputation.

  43. Real friends by tlynch001 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand how these kids are going to get better at baseball and basketball (or whatever sport) if they sit around in front of a computer all day instead of getting outside and practicing.

  44. Oh the irony... by Chaffar · · Score: 1
    Slashdot: Where the socially inept start ripping on the @ generation. Waitasec.. How did you get that +4 karma bonus? Yes, of course by having an active social life :P

    We are nerds. We shouldn't rip on these newcomers to the Internet. 0W|\| 7|-|31r \/\/1N|)0z B*x3S maybe, but not rip on them...

    1. Re:Oh the irony... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      >Own their Windoz boxes

      Some geek you are; it's `boxen'. Check the Jargon files.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:Oh the irony... by narcc · · Score: 1

      "leet speak" grammar pendants? What next?!

  45. Ahem by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live my life online and I wouldn't be found dead at my space. The Myspace crowd are the emo attenction whores who make the most notice. The majority who "live online" are average geeks who perfer their own company and enjoy reading wikipedia and slashdot. But these people don't gather in huge numbers in a forum sort of way (Slashdot is close I guess), so theres no way to record them.. but please for the love of God don't lump me in with these guys.

    --
    I like muppets.
  46. Yeesh....nuke the site from orbit, just to be sure by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    They live online. They buy online. They play online. Their power is growing...


    They also hate to wear shirts and/or kiss themselves in the mirror. Dismantling this web atrocity should be the primary focus of the impending 'Generation ~'. Guh.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  47. Why is myspace so popular? by philipkd · · Score: 1

    Here's an interesting article on why myspace became so popular:
    MySpace: Is 'ghetto' a design choice?. Has some choice comments from former employees of myspace as well.

  48. Why don't... by Chrax · · Score: 1

    Why don't they all just f-f-fade away?

  49. What about World of Warcraft and the burgeoning .. by philipkd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about World of Warcraft and the burgeoning MMORPG space? There are 5.5 million subscribers to WoW, and in total, maybe 20 million people who play these MMORPGs worldwide, from games like Lineage to EverQuest.

    I don't think myspace deserves to be associated with a "generation" because myspace hasn't generated its own unique subculture. And it's not really a "generation" as a large portion of the traffic on myspace is by older men looking for skanks.

    The WoW and gamer culture, on the other hand, has its own languages and inside jokes. Plus guilds are way more cohesive than these loose organizations or "networks."

    I'm creating a social network just for gamers, and WoW players specifically right now: Leetster. This is a link to my profile: pakhuda

  50. historical myopia by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i'm kind of bothered about all these comments worrying about the coming generation because of myspace brainfodder

    depending on how old you are, should we judge you on your graffiti from the 1980s or what you carved in your desk in the 1960s?

    are you serious? you have a poor, dim view of history

    you see a frightening loosening of standards over time before you. it is a false perception, relax

    you suffer from historical myopia

    there is nothing new under the sun, only dumb teenagers being dumb teenagers, as they did in 4000 BC, as they will do in 4000 AD

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:historical myopia by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Small difference here.

      Whatever one may have carved in his desk or sprayed on a wall is probably long gone by now. It may be remembered by the handful of people how may have seen it and be able to associate it with who did it.

      These days, with MySpace, Google, the Internet Archive there is a good chance that 20 years from now, someone types in your name and finds all the things that one types today.

      Yeah sure, kids are being told not to "give information about yourself" to strangers, but I guess MySpace is a pretty good example on how this is ignored.

      I am sure future partners / employers are going to be thrilled to read what someone did when they were 15, or 17 or 20. Especially if it relates to their sexual experiences or their griping about their boss etc.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  51. MySpace, Facebook, and Livejournal by Council · · Score: 1

    My impression of MySpace is basically the same as my impression of Livejournal, except I've never seen a MySpace page that wasn't visually obnoxious.

    I've used LiveJournal for about four years now as a way to keep up with all my non-local friends and occasionally share stuff, and more recently as an RSS/news feed reader. I know it's not the most popular way to handle blogs, but it works for me. I have always had the tasteful default scheme, and I never visit anyone's personal LJ page. I just see their entries in a nice format.

    MySpace, I suspect, is much the same. Largely idiots, but I have a number of non-idiot friends, and some of them are on MySpace. It clearly works as a way to find people, if that's what you want; I've found interesting and intelligent people on Livejournal as well.

    MySpace is a community. It has a visually obnoxious format, and since it encourages socializing it attracts all manner of teens, who then characterize it. It doesn't mean you can't use MySpace for intelligent, grown-up social networking, I'm sure. It's just that people who are neither intelligent nor grown up still socialize, and it's just as good (if not better) a tool for unintelligent immature socilalization. As with LJ, that makes up the bulk.

    And as for finding people -- when I want to look someone up around campus or at another school, I use Facebook. Most of my friends are college-age and on there. And, thank god, Facebook doesn't allow custom themes, colors, or formats. If it didn't exist, I'd have to look people up on MySpace. But it does, so I don't need to go there yet.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  52. Generation Labels by thexgodfather · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the labeling of a generation has become very uncreative and is occurring much too frequently. The only appropriate generation label I can think of dates back to the baby boomers when after the troops returned from World War 2 there was a huge jump in the number of babies.

    The next generation became labeled as generation X. Now according to wikipedia Generation List this is the generation I fall into, being born in 1979. The very name generation X gives a feeling of anonymity and utter lack of creativity. However I have not read Douglas Coupland's 1991 novel Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture.

    The next generation label is Generation Y and is defined as people born in 1982 to 1991. After that there is generation Z and is given the age constraints of 2000+. Does anyone else see a trend of shortening generation gaps and lack of creativity and definition!

    I assume the article naming the next generation as generation @ would be renaming the current generation Y. I am all for this because it gives a much clearer distinction and description of what this upcoming generation is! I would also like to propose shortening the age length of generation X and the baby boomer generation as well.

    This is how I perceive the break down of generations
    Baby Boomers 1943-1957
    Generation X 1958-1973
    Generation @ 1974-1998
    Name Yet to be Defined 1999-?


    I feel this would be a much more accurate depiction of the generation gaps and differences that occur. I also feel that it is unacceptable to label a generation when they are still pre-teen! Your teen years are the years you start to come into yourself and realize who you are.

    Now to specifically focus on generation @ you must realize that myspace is not a phenomenon! There is also freindster and even before that findapix which was around before any of the current sites way back in 1999! With that said yes the computer is a ground breaking achievement of our time and the Internet has brought everyone together but alas we are still in the OIL age we have been since the invention of the car. Its time to change CHANGE CHANGE

    The lack of change for a hundred years can directly be laid to blame on the current young generation. Look at our apatheiticness to the current political situation! Have we learned nothing from the radicals actions of our parents generation?? But I won't get into all that.

    Though, these are the things that define a generation and are a result of their label. So I am going to actually take action for my generation and throw that horrible term Generation Y away! Join with me and cast off your shackles of oppression!

    --------- I guess its appropriate to post my myspace O.o my mypsace PS I am an atrocious speller so please don't mind the mistakes!

    1. Re:Generation Labels by SpacePunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      'X' was named that because either nobody could think of a name, or nobody 'got' us. There's no need too use a 'y' designation other than it follows after 'x', but that just denote lazyness.

      It would be more honest too name generations by world/national economic/political gain/loss. For instance, there is the 'Lost Generation' (yes, I know it formally pertains too writers in the early 1900s, but it's been broadly applied), but what makes them the 'Lost Generation' could be applied too several generations that came before them, and perhaps too the current generation that seems too be holding the limelight. Things tend to follow cycles, and a lot of it just happens over and over again when the previous generation(s) have forgotten about what went on before. Fashion, for instance, comes full circle about every 27 years. Broad generational attitudes could come full circle every 100 years or more.

    2. Re:Generation Labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is wrong with you? Do you not know the difference between 'too' and 'to'? There ought to be a Generation Lazy-as-shit-and-uneducated.

      Good grief.

    3. Re:Generation Labels by orbit86 · · Score: 0

      well all of this myspace generation, x generation y generation is bullshyt.. what defines these generations? It's the war that happened that defines a generation..WW2 kids who only wanted to fuk the girls because they had uniforms on(I would too).and fight for their country.Hell I bet they bitched all the way to berlin like our soldiers are doing now. they should do it, its their right. WW1 generation was forgotten WW2 Peeps - Greatest Generation.. Korea.. hmm alot were WW2 vets..kinda sad thought Vietnam Generation..Rebels,Hippys no one cares about the 80s.. I'll say 90s were internet generation and I can say 2001 will be the Iraqi War..No one will remember afghanisthan because its "quiet" over there. but I was born Dec 4th, 1986.. so I dunno wtf Generation I am.

    4. Re:Generation Labels by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Well, excuse the fuck out of me. I evidently missed the memo that told me I was going to be graded.

    5. Re:Generation Labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the "Incoherent Generation"?

  53. Mirror Shots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Myspace, proving that no one can ever figure out the timer mode on their cameras.

  54. good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i want to bed every girl on my space, just kidding. for real though my space is lame and if you want to say hi to a friend, call them.

  55. Wrong by billybob · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm sorry but you're wrong. Teens (less than 16 or so) are complete fucking morons. There are exceptions to every rule but I can't believe someone would try to defend them. Everyone who's been a teen knows what it's like.

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:Wrong by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then why am I defending them? Are you going to say that I'm a complete fucking moron, as well, now? If you do I hope you can cite more than anecdotal evidence to support your claim.

      Mind you, I'm not claiming that all teenagers are intelligent and sensible, I'm claiming that they are of various intelligences in the same proportions as any other subgroup of society. There are as many smart teens as smart adults, and there are as many idiot adults as there are teens.

    2. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admit that I may be biased due to the fact that I am currently of sixteen years of age myself, but I agree with your point. I feel this way due to the following truths:
      a) I have never broken any law. Ever.
      b) I have never gotten an allowance (aside from a short while at age six, which was terminated for no given reason) and therefore needed to work to earn money, thereby giving me experience.
      c) I have seen extremely childish behavior from people in their fourties approximately twice a month. It disturbs me.
      d) I do not listen to "trashy music". The worst it has gotten is Bohemian Rhapsody by Queen (which can hardly be considered trashy, in my humble opinion), with most of the rest being some form of classical music.
      e) Upon watching Jeopardy, I, in most cases (about 55-60%), would have gotten a higher score than any of the contestants.
      f) I have gotten results exceeding 170 on multiple IQ tests, and no less than 160 ever (what I received on the test from MENSA's web page).
      g) I have won several awards in computer science in the five years I have been programming (example: Planet Source Code coding competition)
      h) I assume I am not the only sixteen year old who can list facts a-h (this one included purposefully).

      Note that I am not claiming all teenagers are sensible. I am just saying that there is a spectrum, as the parent pointed out, but the great-great-grandparent failed to recognize.

      Again, the bias here is likely the result of myself being part of this age group.

    3. Re:Wrong by ilovepolymorphism · · Score: 1

      Agreed... I'm in college and I work at a restaurant as a part time job... It's a small restaurant so most of the times when I'm working I'm the only one there(so I have to do everything, etc.. Interact with customers, train people, etc..) People are generally stupid... Not just teenagers.. Yes, a lot of teenagers can be annoying in different ways than adults, but I dare say the majority of people are stupid in general... It's sad but that's the way it is.

    4. Re:Wrong by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Your whole comment (including the list of how great your iqs) shows only one thing:

      You miss the point. My point, and the original posters point.
      Think about it: If i admit i was an idiot, too, than this is from my adult point of view.
      That doesnt say anything about what i thought back then.

      Nothing to do with breaking laws or IQs (i am in MENSA, too, thank you very much).
      Just changing point of views that creep into your mind while growing up and alter your perception of actions/behaviour/ect.
      Many things i thought to be "objectively" cool, or that my oppinion of "would never change", did change with growing up. You might not notice it, but after 10 years or so, your point of view WILL have changed so much that your own old behaviour mirrored by others will seem obnoxious to you.

      Which just means: Stay in you age group, dont expect to hang out around kids in the internet and not be blown away by your experience of applied immaturity and stupidity.

      That was my intention of the reply, too. To show the original poster that he isnt experiencing a web-only phenomenon, nor something linked to the current generation of teenagers.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Wrong by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      With an IQ exceeding 170, you should know how rare an IQ exceeding 170 is, and so how irrelevant an example you are when the average teen is discussed. No one would seriously deny there's a spectrum, all that is said is that a very big chunk of that spectrum is well below sea level. I'm not talking IQ-wise, btw, but I do expect some correlation between IQ and, erm, you-know, so I wouldn't expect someone with an IQ above (say) 160 to be, erm... still submerged by the age of 15.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    6. Re:Wrong by aethera · · Score: 1

      When I was a teenager I was the hard working straight A type, friendly, creative, and the last sort of teenager that anyone would conside a moron. But now, with not even handfull of years in hindsight I would be the first to say that I was, if not a complete moron, certainly a more garden variety moron. Teens are beings in transition, physically, psychologically, morally and socially. With that transition comes exploration and with exploration, error. That doesn't excuse or rationalize bad teenage behavior, or negate the vital part that teens and teen perspective contribute to our race and culture, it just helps to understand it.

    7. Re:Wrong by noamsml · · Score: 1

      You know, no matter how much you repeat an unbased claim, it won't make it true.

    8. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAD...GET OUTTA HERE!!!

      Your Embarassing Me!!!

      -joebob

    9. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe I'm actually seeing people brag about the fact that they're in MENSA.

      Wow, what has this world come to?

    10. Re:Wrong by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... I see. You've both grown so old, but you still lack the wisdom to realize that your latest opinion isn't necessarily or objectively your best and that you have no right to insult others based on your resentment of your former self. In fact, you really should learn to not resent your former self at all.

      Just because you're older now and think a different way doesn't mean that the opinions of your teenaged self and other people's teenaged selves are invalid, it just means you disagree. Try to respectfully disagree.

      Please be more respectful of young people. There are intelligent teens trying to win their age peers more rights than deciding what goes on an iPod, and people like you and the original poster are unfortunately holding them back.

    11. Re:Wrong by KronicD · · Score: 1

      a) I have never broken any law. Ever.

      I call bullshit on this one, you've broken copyright law, everyone has! in fact, im breaking it right now!

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    12. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people make me sick, you label teenagers as a whole as morons but add that there is exception to every rule. You know what, your all morons for labeling all of us, as your generation raised all of us, if a lot of us turned out like this it YOUR fault as you are incompatible of raising us correctly, please sir get a life and stop putting others down to make yourself look good.

      Not all of us teenagers are morons, as not all of us had morons LIKE YOU to raise us which think they are self-righteous. Source of them problem for this generation is the last one, and you sir are part of the last one. Let me list you some teenagers whom you included in your group which have done so much for you but all you could do is call them a moron:
      Hiten Pandya - a FreeBSD developer since he was 12 and a Core DragonFly BSD developer since the project started.
      The 420 Google Sumer of code students plus the 9000 others who applied.
      Many KDE and GNOME developers, such as my friend Raphaël Slinckx
      I could count 73 teenagers that activily develop on Mozilla (at least 1 patch per month) 30 of them are part of SLUG, there surely is a lot more.
      Everyone listed on the following pages are teenagers are not morons except a few such as saddam's son ;)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1986_births
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1987_births
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1988_births
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1989_births
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1990_births
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1991_births
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1992_births

      Sorry for the rushed post, I need to cook dinner tonight.

  56. Help for myspace addicts! by donotread · · Score: 1

    There is even support groups for myspace addicts! http://www.myspaceaddicts.com/

  57. Communication Tools versus Social Scenes by philipkd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Myspace is a club. And just like real world clubs, its popularity will be transient. In 3 years, there will be some other Internet social scene that will dominate. And 3 years from then, another one. The existence of this BusinessWeek article alone makes myspace that much less cooler to be on. Remember Friendster? That was becoming like what myspace was, until myspace became cooler. Now Friendster's going bankrupt.

    Communication tools, on the other hand, stick around. Look at AOL Instant Messenger. Crappy tool, but still the most popular. I even think facebook will survive this social networking service bubble. Facebook is also like a tool in that it functions as your school's better yearbook/directory.

    Quality tools and services are long-term. Clubs and social scenes are ephemeral.

    1. Re:Communication Tools versus Social Scenes by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with what you say - all of the sites focused primarily on friends-networking (Sixdegrees was the first one I remember) seem to fade away quickly. LiveJournal on the other hand is still around after several years, primarily I would say because it provides a useful means of communication between existing friends networks, and it's less obsessed with only getting people to find new people.

      Having said that, I'm not sure which category MySpace falls into - my impression was that it was more like LiveJournal in terms of allowing things like journals and communication (although MySpace seems to be worse in various ways, such as the awful interface...)

    2. Re:Communication Tools versus Social Scenes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi5 [hi5.com] | eClubs [eclubs.co.uk] ?

  58. Oh look, another pretentious journalist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. Another journalist who thinks that he's found a fad that defines a generation, and labels the kids accordingly. Listen, journalists, as a 21-year-old male, I am not part of:

    The MTV Generation
    The Jackass Generation
    The Napster Generation

    And I doubt the teenagers a few years younger than me would appreciate being called a part of a goddamned "MySpace Generation". (If they do, they should be boiled in excrement for all eternity, of course.)

    It's just an attempt by a preceding generation to say "Oh look, here's a stupid trend they're all into. Let's define them by it because we're shallow, pretentious wankers and can't write in a manner which doesn't inspire fury in people with two brain cells rubbing together."

    Assholes, all of them.

    How about Generation Z? As in Generation "ZZZzzzz you're boring me with your stupid attempts to pigeon-hole an entire group of people with your ridiculous corporate labels. Yeah, I know you want to be the guy who coins the name of a Generation, but seriously, you're an uncreative, stupid hack writer, go fuck yourself, go fuck yourself, go fuck yourself..." "

  59. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away their rights by jZnat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Judging by how readily they'll buy the RIAA's latest shit albums for $20 a pop and how they'll click next through their EULAs faster than an AC posting a stupid fad joke on Slashdot, I'd have to say that they definitely are used to giving away their rights. If they gave a damn about their rights, we wouldn't have nearly as much shit we deal with these days...

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  60. Apparently... by arpk4n3 · · Score: 1

    It's not just the people on MySpace we have to worry about in terms of perversions of the English language... (It's spelled 'coming') ;)

  61. Thanks for the add! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    About 99% of the comments I see on any posts on MySpace consist of:

    "Thanks for adding me!"
    "Thanks for the add!"

    More annoying than "first post" because they never end.

  62. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

    no it probably just means you don't know any other humans.

    --
    -- lol pwned
  63. And isnt it sad... by chrisxkelley · · Score: 1

    how long some people spend customizing their myspces just because they're flash developer nerds who still like to communicate with friends through an easy to use network?

    http://myspace.com/the_nerd

    oh wait... that's me.. :-\

  64. That Story is False by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

    do 2 minutes of googling and you'll find no evidence of that.

    --
    -- lol pwned
    1. Re:That Story is False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do three seconds of Google News, and you will find evidence of that...

      http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?a rticle_id=6d8134fbbe964d76f864b3b9682dcb19

    2. Re:That Story is False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:That Story is False by millennial · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong. See?

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  65. But most of all... by Jaxoreth · · Score: 2, Funny

    samy is my hero.

    --
    In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
    1. Re:But most of all... by Wesley55221 · · Score: 1

      The parent is, of course, refering to the guy that wrote a worm (using HTML + Javascript) to get a lot of MySpace friends. He's even written down how he did it. Quite an interesting read.

      http://namb.la/popular/tech.html

  66. $580 MILLION DOLLAHZ MASSA!!! by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    damn, I still can't believe that...!! =/

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  67. It does feel like a hack. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    I have recently dabbled with MySpace's pages for a script I wrote, and it looks very sloppily written. If you go to the page that displays someone's friends, their name is passed in the URL along with some other useless data, such as both page number and range of results. I don't much care for it.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  68. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, ...

  69. Anti hunting? by lonasindi · · Score: 1

    I like how that last article is vaguely anti-hunting.

    ....that is all

  70. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then I welcome you to the new internet. I present to you this guide:

    www.livejournal.com - here you can find the angst filled blogs of teenagers (some who have many blogs at the same time, under different names as though they were different people), it mostly revolves around how they broke up with their lover, and this is some world changing event that has never happened to anyone else before.

    www.deadjournal.com - this is for graduates of livejournal, when livejournal simply isn't angsty enough for you - you move to deadjournal, you still dress in your pink halter tops and mini skirts as you prance around the highschool halls, but when you go home you get in a fight with your parents over your (clothing, marks, obligations, nothing in particular), turn on the linkin park, and tell the world your slitting your wrists to save yourself from the pain of living, but really your typing this - which is clear indication your wrists are intact.

    www.deviantart.com - a battleground for many dissonant internet addicted groups, you have the anti-social, demi-goth group that fills DA with morbid poetry and pictures of half naked goth chicks covered in blood. You have the people who use DA as a collection for their attempts at still art and scenery shots, mostly trying to balance centered objects 5/8ths in the frame without it looking like a snapshot. Then there are the furries, who draw a picture of a person who is half animal, then write erotica about this person and their steamy (and disturbing) adventures.

    www.myspace.com - discussed above, mostly a collection of people trying to define themselves as an individual, but failing horribly as they either give up halfway, or end up defining themselves as a member of the nameless myspace community

    www.somethingawful.com - a comedy outlet, mostly involving submitted photoshop pictures, and 100 page arguments on how to make 2+2=5 (as example).

    www.slashdot.org - the pinnacle of the internet, this is where all the news no one bothered to report goes, and then is discussed at length by people who think debating nothing on the internet with strangers constitutes a healthy social relationship

    that's all I've got for major stops right now, there are of course AOL IM and MSN IM that are also flush with nooblettes chatting endlessly on the topic of nothing. IRC chat rooms, where warez and pr0n is traded endlessly between servers and leechers, and where people can spend days answering trivia questions to bots against other equally bored leechers (or bot fishers).

  71. Waait... (MSN) by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    You mean MySpace isn't just another front for MSN Spaces?

    I mean, at a glance they seem so similar.

  72. My Space already has real competition by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

    The college kids myspace is thefacebook.com is targeted at college kids. It's nice because it allows you to put your phone number and other info online but restrict who can see it. This comes in handy when you are trying to get hold of someone for a class project but you don't have their number. But the two greatest things is that it requires a university email which weeds out the middle schoolers, high schoolers, and parents. And it doesn't allow you to customize yourpage making information easy to find.

    It also has a really cool approach to sharing photos and allows you to tag which of your friends are in them and links it to their account. Th

    1. Re:My Space already has real competition by conebrid · · Score: 1

      I no longer use facebook as their privacy policy allows them to sell your information to third parties. I signed up without reading it to begin with and used it for a couple weeks. Then I started getting spam in my uni account, which is great seeing as how I also use that account to communicate with my profs, classmates, coworkers, etc. So I deleted my account. Too little too late, of course, but at least I won't be subjected to the advertising on their site anymore. (Which wasn't that bad, but combined with selling my information... that's too much)
      Other than having a license-to-spam, I really did like facebook. It has some really nice features. I particulary liked being able to input my schedule, and then browse profiles of people who I was in class with. Great for finding out who that certain hottie is. ;)

    2. Re:My Space already has real competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how am I supposed to pose as a college student to troll the site and attempt to fuck college chicks? Anyone got a college e-mail addy to sell me?

  73. Myspace by cortana · · Score: 1, Troll

    Forty million illiterate assholes who run up my data transfer bills by transcluding the images from my site on their shitty circle jerk home pages.

  74. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by doormat · · Score: 1

    I'm almost 25, and I only really know of myspace because my younger sister is on it and I noticed on her computer. I ended up making an account just to look around for people I knew. Turns out a pissload of people I know are on it. Though I resist the urge to start adding "friends", lest I actually begin to use the service.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  75. 2 Week MySpace Review by ckawalek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been on MySpace for just about 2 weeks now, after first regarding the site as an jumble of crappy pages a few months ago, I've learned it can be a very unique and enjoyable place for the average computer user or guru both. A few notes:

    The code is buggy as can be but primarily works after reloading the page a couple of times.

    Great social networking factor. I've messaged friends I haven't talked to since high school and chatted with college friends whom I've already lost touch with.

    For new bands this is really an invaluable resource for which to create a simple website that informs fans and create evangelists of your music.

    Being a part time concert photographer I've already received orders for prints of my photography as well as met may others involved or wishing to be involved in the field. I've also made contacts with a number of bands and old friends involved in the music industry whom I've also been out of touch with.

    I wish Google would have purchased the company, but let's hope Fox does a decent job with it.

    Try it out, you just might like it

    -Chris
    http://www.myspace.com/concertphotos

  76. MySpace-Teenager's view by Seroth · · Score: 1

    Well, I had to say something about this because I am in fact, a 16-year old with a MySpace account (well, myspace.com/seroth if you really wanna see it). I've been reading a lot of comments about myspace and all the teenagers on it and quite frankly you guys are MOSTLY right. However, I got a little mad when some stereotypes came into play, saying how most of the teenagers (myspace has people above 19 and is in fact mostly filled with older people, but yes a lot of teenagers use it) are in general, a bit slow and well, not very hopeful for our future. My answer is that, although more than half the people in my school who have it could be considered legally stupid, most of the people I am "friends" with are real people and are actually quite smart and for lack of a better word, enlightened. YES, myspace can lead to less embarrassment.YES, some people on it are just trying to get to the most friends ever. But has anyone thought of the potential for it? A while back I read an article in WIRED about how MySpace can be used as the next MTV because many start-up bands and artists are using it to help them gain publicity and fans and several concerts and concert tickets are being made known through this. Not to mention the fact that maybe in the future, we may even see small businesses using it as marketing tools (well, I did say maybe). So, stop stereotyping. And look for the small good things in that package of crap. Because we are there. And don't worry about the future. It's gonna be taken care of.

    --
    If you don't have time to do it right, when do you have time to do it again?
  77. i told u i was hardcore by QuePasaCalabaza · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think of the story of the (in)famous irc suicide whenever they read one of those myspace tragedies?

  78. The "what" now? by vain+gloria · · Score: 1

    ...the entire U.S. Internet.

    Geez, I thought all that ICANN DNS business was settled amicably. No need to go rubbing other nation's faces in it ;)

  79. Dont forget about RMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ratemybody.com/profile.aspx?id=FEASTTTT
    Thats me... not ALL computer people are fat nerds...
    I like RMB because when you search you can sort by rating... lol

  80. Interesting Commonalities Between Images by stoicio · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed what most of the images of people
    at MySpace have in common. They can be grouped.
    I wonder if MySpace could be used as a people classifier...

  81. Example of well done MySpace Design. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    http://www.myspace.com/timbenzinger

    It's not all crap.

    Ha. Except for this.
    http://www.myspace.com/theschmoejoes
    (Shameless plug)

  82. Fun tip: by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

    set up your web server to send pictures of stoats to UAs with a MySpace Referer header. Or penises.

    1. Re:Fun tip: by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      I've done this before. Anyone who hotlinks my images (i.e. a referer from other than my domain) gets a goatse image that says "STOP STEALING MY BANDWIDTH".

      If you really want to be insidious about it, do it only manually. This is hilarious when you have someone with an eBay auction stealing your images. Wait for them to get bids so they can't edit their description and then swap out the image with something horribly obscene. They can't do anything except close the auction, but the auction page is still up for about 90 days. Its totally embarassing for the a**holes but they deserve it.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
  83. Myspace and.. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I don't know myspace, never visited the site, don't know what it is about.
    So I followed the link and went to their front page. and there were nothing at all that told me what it was about and no reason for me to stay.
    Well I clicked around and found out that it was another site for those people who like to see themself on a website.
    I guess I am not the Myspace generation. :)

  84. generation myths by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1
    Most "Boomers" were not hippies and did not go to Woodstock nor ever worked on Wall Street afterwards.

    Most of "Generation-X" did not wear Grunge nor ever live in the streets.

    Most of "Y" does not subscribe to "WIRED" nor ever heard of Slashdot, let alone post here.

    Now we are told that you must have a "MySpace" account to be counted, somehow...

    So whomever spends the most money, on the dumbest things possible, in order to make the biggest asses out of themselves that they can -- that little group is chosen to represent the majority of a generation?

    I must disagree.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  85. When did all the minds close around here? by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is amazing. There are a few positive responses to MySpace, but the vast majority of the responses seem to be along the lines of:

    1) There are so many low-class/stupid/aesthetically-challenged/offensiv e-in-some-other-way people on MySpace and I can't stand that.

    2) MySpace is mostly populated by teenagers, and this particular batch of teenagers is so much worse than teenagers from my generation.

    3) MySpace is ripping off the people who use it, through TOS that allow MySpace to profit from content created by MySpace denizens.

    4) The content on MySpace is total crap. There's nothing of value on MySpace. Ten thousand monkeys could create better content.

    The "I can't stand the people on MySpace" response is similar to the bitching and moaning about blogging, which comes up on Slashdot constantly these days. On the one hand, Slashdotters are happy to carry the torch of freedom, demanding that Big Media should no longer control us, that TV should get hit with a clue stick, and so on. Yet when a community does spring up and people of all kinds, the unwashed digital masses, get on board, it freaks out a lot of Slashdotters. This is so reminiscent of the "if you don't know how to run UNIX, you shouldn't be doing things on the Internet" attitude so prevalent among alpha-geeks in the mid 1990s. The Internet shouldn't just be for geeks, any more than athletics should just be for jocks, or beaches should just be for beautiful people.

    Not everyone on MySpace is a teenager. But people seem hungup on the large number of teens on MySpace. Teenagers are teenagers are teenagers are teenagers. My father's generation was the one that screwed up the Vietnam War and turned the whole nation upside down. When they started causing trouble in the early 60s, they were the scourge of America. They turned out ok. A bit self-righteous, but ok. ;-) My generation was described as a bunch of shiftless slackers when we were teens. We had no soul, no drive, no moral compass, and nothing to contribute to society. Somehow that opinion changed when we hit the workforce in big numbers and contributed to the boom in the Information Economy. The teenagers of today are obsessed with the superficial, spoiled, and unconnected to reality. I'm sure by the time they reach their 20s and 30s, they'll somehow magically be transformed into good citizens. Funny how that works, isn't it?

    The using MySpace are just like any slice of a given population. Some of them have interesting things to say and some of them don't. Some of them are creative and others aren't too imaginative. Maybe the venue attracts one type of person more than another, but generalizing about content on MySpace, even if the generalization is correct, doesn't mean that there's nothing of value on MySpace.

    As for the Terms of Service, MySpace users are making an exchange. They get to tap into a huge network of people and information without cost. In return, MySpace (Fox) can use content from MySpace if it wants to, for commercial gain. 99.9% of the content on MySpace, no matter how good, is not going to be used for commercial purposes by Fox, simply because there's so much of it. The content that is good enough (and that depends on how you define "good") to be used by Fox may in some way be exploited commercially. Do you really think that the creator of such content wouldn't be happy to have their content publicized by Fox?

    Think back to when you were a bit younger, and imagine that something like MySpace existed at the time. You'd probably be pretty excited by it, perhaps because you hadn't yet become jaded to all things Internet, perhaps because you liked the idea of communicating with people outside of the narrow confines of the community you lived in.

    MySpace isn't for me. It obviously isn't for a lot of Slashdot regulars. So what. Get off the high horse. Diversity is good. Peer to peer communication is good. Or should we just go back to the monoculture of NBC, CBS, and ABC?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:When did all the minds close around here? by se7en11 · · Score: 0

      Very well said.

    2. Re:When did all the minds close around here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this AOL?

      Me too! Me too!! OMG!!

    3. Re:When did all the minds close around here? by js92647 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but some of us still detest MySpace for what it stands: Communcation between idiots as opposed to communication between people who use their time efficiently and not spend the whole day surfing through MySpace entries. Wait until MySpace starts charging (if they didn't catch on already)

      Yes, I also oppose blogs, but thats just me.

    4. Re:When did all the minds close around here? by VaticDart · · Score: 2
      But your definition is how one "uses their time efficiently" is basically an arbitrary one that comes from how your generation grew up, and what values you gleaned from your parents, society, and simply yourself as you reacting to the society around you.

      I would agree that it is a "waste of time" to spent all day surfing MySpace, just as it is a waste of time to spend all day surfing Slashdot, but again, these are TEENAGERS! For the past century, at least in the United States, teenagers have spent most of their free time doing things the adults around them would consider worthless and a waste: driving around, binge drinking, rallying for a revolution that never came, watching TV, MTV, playing Nintendo, blogging (on MySpace and elsewhere), IMing, talking on the phone, practicing in bands that never got anywhere, and so on. Part of growing up in any society is figuring out the balance between what you want to do and be, and what you need to do and be in order to function in society, and the teenage years, in our society, is when one first really starts figuring out that one has this whole world available to them outside of their parents. They're going to do things which the generation behind them simply can't understand beyond that generation being open to the fact that they probably pissed off their preceding generation with all their "worthless" activities.

      Furthermore, some "worthless" activities turn into huge parts of society. Early rock and roll bands, kids tinkering with computers in the 70s, kids tinkering with photography in the first half of the 20th century, and so on. Hard to tell what will be useful skills when the next generation comes into power, but fun to watch.

  86. myspace is no different than IM and chat in a way by digitallysick · · Score: 0

    Back in the day you looked up people on icq , searched a specific age range, checked the profile, requested pics, etc. This is the same, but all in one, its ok, my only issue with it, is all these "secne" Kids, or these emo "scar on my life" kids are lame, and i hate all the banners and ads, but its ok overall.

  87. ONE-HIT WONDERS by wrenhunter · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... boyfriend IMs her a retail store link ... She's also postering for the next Buzz-Oven concert ... and she's updating her own blog ... The TV is set to TBS ... she listen[s] to iTunes over her computer speakers. Simultaneously, she's chatting with dorm mate Carrie ...

    This is college?! Man, we need to get these kids some drugs ... STAT! What ever happened to sloth and lethargy? I want those jaws slack! Pupils dilated! I want a stack of dishes this high. I want to see BEDSORES people!

  88. Re:I'm guess I'm not part of "Generation @" by ephex · · Score: 1

    No, you're lucky!

  89. Careful where you stick that thing by 77Punker · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who has over 1000 myspace friends and fucks random ones all the time. She has a couple STD's and has no idea from where they came, but continues to fuck anything that myspaces. Her vagina is so ruined that there's no chance of her ever having children because of the STD's. Have fun.

    On the plus side, the gene pool is better off.

    1. Re:Careful where you stick that thing by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Other than the words `friend' and `she' being used in the same context on Slashdot, your post is either a load of shit or a sad reminder of what a cesspool myspace is...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:Careful where you stick that thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Link please.

    3. Re:Careful where you stick that thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Careful where you stick that thing by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      mmmm unprotected sex in an omlete of disease....

  90. Non-Corporate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    " is one of the most powerful non-corporate marketing forces ever. "

    Where have you been living? Under a rock? MySpace is owned by Rupert Murdoch.

    "isn't sex always the leader in a societal change"

    huh? Cheating on one's partner is considered a path to enlightenment and social utopia? Ever heard of trust? The basic glue that keeps us together?

    "If someone hurts another person in any way, you can be sure that it will get through all the various local cliques and the offender will be castigated and watched more closely. Even peer review of one's actions is instant. One person can post an angry comment about another, and the "jury of one's peers" comes into action, either defending that person or realizing that the person is probably guilty of the action first posted."

    So in other words it's just human society running as normal.

    "I believe that those who think we need more government in our lives should carefully watch as the next generation gets along just fine, pushing together their millions of decisions and beliefs in the free markets trumping of democracy."

    Herein lies the quintessential hypocrisy of your thought. A couple of paragraphs before this you were championing "hooking up" and free love. In other words cheating and breaking trust with a fellow human being. Yet you think that people inherently get along? Methinks you need to get out more.

    I actually find it ironic that you propagate a free market of sex over other forms of markets.

  91. Myspace.com Makes, Breaks New Music Acts by BlueMoss · · Score: 1

    The music industry has been lapped, lassoed and tattoed by the internet. Payola and other barriers to entry for new bands are rapidly crumbling as listeners of CDs and radio shift to online music. Traditional business deals for bands have almost always left the musicians screwed without a kiss. Tours and T-shirts have been the major income streams for most successful groups.

    Now social networks are superceding the music and broadcasting corporations for publicity and distribution. Bands need to be heard before they can be paid. And they need to perform to build a fan base.

    Get the clues from Wired:

    The Hit Factory Who needs major labels, marketing, or airplay? A social networking site is getting more hits than Google -- and turning invisible bands into mini entertainment networks. How MySpace became the MTV for the Net generation.

    By Jeff Howe

    The members of Hawthorne Heights have no business being rock stars. They play a strain of punk that has consigned innumerable bands to the obscurity of dive bars and pirate radio. For the past three decades, a devotion to this stripped-down, anticommercial music has meant never quitting your day job.

    And yet here they are on a dusty summer day in Pomona, California, playing for thousands of adoring fans. Hawthorne Heights is a big draw at this year's Warped Tour, a movable punk feast featuring more than 300 bands on 48 North American stops. The kids in the audience - a multiracial mix of teens from across Southern California - appear transported, pushing toward the front of the stage where slam dancers crash against each other like pinballs. Those in the front rows chant the lyrics with red-faced intensity. They've memorized the entire set.

    Hawthorne Heights is touring the country in a plush bus. The quintet's debut album, The Silence in Black and White, has sold more than 500,000 copies since its release last year, and the group has appeared on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live and been on MTV's TRL. The five young men from Dayton, Ohio, are living the rock-and-roll dream - but they took a highly unconventional path to get there. The band achieved its popularity without any real radio or TV airplay, a feat unheard-of a few years ago. They aren't signed to a major label, and they don't want to be. They don't need industrial-strength marketing campaigns or heavy rotation.

    What they have is MySpace, a community Web site that converts electronic word of mouth into the hottest marketing strategy since the advent of MTV. Massively popular, MySpace is nominally a social networking site like Friendster, but nearly 400,000 of the site's roughly 30 million user pages belong to bands. The rest belong mostly to teens and twentysomethings who attend the groups' shows, download their songs, read their blogs, send them fan mail, and enthusiastically spread the word...MORE

    --
    There are no absolutes.
  92. It's already here by Animats · · Score: 1

    I just ate at the Palo Alto Cafe on Middlefield. 18 people and 10 laptops. At the next table was a cute young couple, both dressed in black. Between them, they had two laptops, a Blackberry, a graphing calculator, at least one iPod, and cell phones. All in use.

  93. Article author didnt look too hard... by saitoh · · Score: 1


    From the article:
    > You have just entered the world of what you *might* call Generation @.

    Everything I've seen in research publications, books, and surveys refers to this generation as "Millenials". I was on my universities activities board a couple years ago when this generation (those born between roughly 1980-2000) started to enter college. At the national conference (NACA) there were presentations about how the face of college was going to change and how our generation (as I fit in there) have different tendancies and use technology more and/or differently then previous generations.

    Evidently many individuals who fit into the age group held a conference and figured out what the call themselves years ago instead of having the previous generation brand them (as attempted in the article).

    also, an article I kept as a result of that conference:
    http://www.mondaymemo.net/010702feature.htm (from July 2001)

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
  94. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away their rights by starm_ · · Score: 1

    You actually spend precious time reading EULAs?

  95. It's really... by winphreak · · Score: 1

    ...Just another emo* breeding ground.

    *Emo: As in, the kids who listen to heartbroken musicians of this generation pour heart and soul into rock, metal, heavy metal, etc. Some habits include weak attempts at self-mutilation, depression, and all out self-pity. Often mistaken as Goth or Skater.
    Seriously, all forms of the name "I_hate_life" are taken. And don't forget those cursed X's they love to abuse.

    --
    "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
  96. I'm sooo going to post about it on MySpace! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you shut the fuck up about how people mistype shit all the time? All that matters is that you understand their message, not how they perfect it for you.

    1. Re:Education by marsonist · · Score: 1

      Right, and while we're at it can we please shut up about sloppy dressers, sweaty armpits, bad breath, and people who can't form a sentence that doesn't include swear words. Certainly how we present ourselves isn't as important in life as what we think of ourselves.

  98. Gah! by GotenXiao · · Score: 1

    I refuse to be associated with a bunch of computer illiterate, wannabe "hackers", emos and generally stupid people >.>

    --
    Goten Xiao
  99. Thanks for your input, grandpa by jkauzlar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I agree with you for the most part, but remember the article said they had something like forty million users! Myspace stinks because it is so goddamn slow and they need to limit the blinking lights and shit people can put on their pages. On the other hand, there are a lot of people who seem to enjoy it. I doubt it will just go away like a fad. I wouldn't be surprised if, like all businesses today, most *individuals* will have their own page on the internet in a few years. When I got my first email address in 1995 when I started college, I used the name 'asswipe' thinking I'd never use it. I had to pay $25 to change it a couple years later because I was having to use it all the time and it was a very embarassing email name.

    For you myspace nay-sayers, I recommend repeated listens of the first track on Bob Dylan's 3rd album.

    1. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The size of the audience doesn't indicate the quality of the subject. There are plenty of crazy red staters that think Bush should get a third term (I'm serious - one came to my house asking me if I was a registered voter and if I would support their cause). That doesn't make them intelligent or right whatsoever.

      MTV has a huge audience, too. So what?

      MySpace also sucks because it's a bunch of self-involved twats navel-gazing. Someone else commented that "that's what you do when you're young". The hell it is. I'm not that old and I wasn't a pretentious, self-involved drama whore seeking the world's attention on a stage when I was a kid or teenager and neither are my siblings (who are the target MySpace demographic right now). For that matter, I can't think of anyone that really fit that bill when I was in school either, other than a very small handful of people that didn't need MySpace to be drama queens and self-involved aholes.

      MySpace has granted a bunch of whiney imbeciles the power to mistakenly believe they are all intelligent, popular and important. It's still nothing more than an AOL chat room based on its presentation, population and content. MySpace is a mix between a crappy journal (and god damn it, whatever happened to writing a journal FOR YORUSELF and not foisting it on humanity?!) and a great place to win friends and alienate friends and be a total douche and do things like make everything think you're going to commit suicide or hook up with some older guy or harass each other or whatever other mundane crap pops into kids head.

      Children aren't stupider today. MySpace children certainly are, however. I don't care if there are 40 BILLION of them. They're still retarded and anyone with an ounce of common sense can see that. MySpace is the new AOL when it comes to referencing the worst behavior and people of the internet in a single word.

    2. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by mdwh2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      whatever happened to writing a journal FOR YORUSELF and not foisting it on humanity?!

      Whatever happened to keeping your opinions on MySpace/LiveJournal to yourself, and not foisting it on humanity?

    3. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      You really don't have to read any of it. I don't.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    4. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by getwhipped · · Score: 1

      I was just about to believe you until you started calling everyone retards. Apparently, Slashdot is "a great place to win friends and alienate friends and be a total douche and do things like make everything think you're going to commit suicide or hook up with some older guy or harass each other or whatever other mundane crap pops into [people's] heads."

      --
      get whipped (you know you like it)
    5. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like someone has had a few too many friends requests rejected LOLOLOL

      learn to not suck at the internet, k?

    6. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      How are you getting modded anything but troll? Look, you seem REALLY certain of what is right and wrong in the world, and apparently MySpace clashes with everything you believe to be just...or something.

      Fact of the matter is, not everybody is like you, and in fact it appears that the vast majority (whether you like/respect it) is not.

      "The hell it is. I'm not that old and I wasn't a pretentious, self-involved drama whore seeking the world's attention on a stage when I was a kid or teenager and neither are my siblings (who are the target MySpace demographic right now)."

      Apparently your siblings are NOT in the target demographic if they are not self-involved drama whores. Remember, demographics isn't just about what age they are (I'm in advertising, I should know this). You claim you are not that old, but apparently you are too old to realize that times change, and technology speeds up the pace of things.

      While I personally don't care for much of the content on MySpace either, I'm content to leave them be and let them do their thing. Apparently though since you are the ultimate judge of what is important content and what is not though, those people should not post anything. BZZZZT! Wrong! You are making a huge horrible assumption that what is on the site is not important. What you don't realize is that this is YOUR OPINION. It IS important to at least one person for it to have been posted on there. And frankly thats all that matters. If you have that much of a problem with MySpace, don't visit it. Its not like anybody is forcing you to go there, this is the internet for christs sake.

      Your posts make you come off as nothing more than some elitist ass who thinks he's so much more intellectual for mocking the journalistic content of teenagers who are simply looking for an outlet to express themselves to the world. Seriously, don't like it? Bugger off, they sure as hell don't need you there.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      And there goes the point flying straight over a moderator's head.

      I have nothing against anyone writing their opinions online. I'm not the one claiming that MySpace/LiveJournal users wish to foist their opinions on humanity, whilst not applying the same logic to people who post elsewhere online.

    8. Re:Thanks for your input, grandpa by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      I'm no fan of MySpace either -- actually the way I heard about the site in the first place was in reference to some cross-site-scripting vulnerability, which isn't exactly anything to inspire confidence -- and I've yet to meet anyone in real life that's into MySpace who isn't fairly obnoxious. However with that said, the site does serve a purpose for the people that use it, and nobody's making me go there. I fail to see how people can get so worked up about the place. If you don't like it and think that the majority of users there are retards, then don't ever go there. Problem solved. It's not as though (to the best of my knowledge) MySpace is aggressively driving other social networking sites out of business or something.

      If someone wants to provide a cognizant explanation of why MySpace is worth getting all worked up about because it's so stupid, feel free. But I think a whole lot of things are stupid, and on the list of offensively stupid things, MySpace ranks pretty low.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  100. OMG That's me! by ash.connor · · Score: 1

    The first few lines of that post described me in every way!

    If I'm really that bad I might kill myself

    PS Does anybody know where to get a shotgun in the UK I tried Froogle/eBay and I'm all outta ideas.

  101. There is a reason FOX bought it!! by riversky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a reason FOX wanted myspace.com....It is nothing more than a place for crap bands to advertise freely (although some good ones yes) and if you look at the types of people there they are FOX's target market. Dumb, big media crazy, all think alike (read favorites and comments etc) and self absorbed! Check it out it I speak the truth.

    1. Re:There is a reason FOX bought it!! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Generalize much? I might as well say that any douche posting to /. at 10 pm on a Saturday is certainly a basement-dwelling virgin who hasn't showered in weeks, is very annoyed that his mom threw out his Dorkus the Warrior #1 with his Magic: The Lathering porn-themed cards, and kicking himself for using a superfluous 'it'in his post.

      Check it out it I speak the truth.

  102. Myspace-free by DrIdiot · · Score: 1
    I'm proud to say that I am one of a small minority of teenagers who does not have a myspace.

    These online blogs tend to be filled with idiots. Xangas - for instance - are filled - plagued - with political blogs of 13 year olds with opinons that are devoid of intelligence and thought. They basically read "political" books and parrot the opinions fed to them in the books. And whenever anyone with a different opinion says so, they can't help but insult the hell out of each other until neither of them has any dignity left. I see this equally from both sides of the coin. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who can't form his or her own opinion has a worthless opinion.

    Myspaces are different in the sense that it's just so utterly pointless. It's not like people don't have enough e-contact every day. We have e-mail, we have instant messaging. Now people make myspaces and put their "profile info" up and write about themselves and more about themselves. Then they mention why their life pretty much epitomizes sorrow and individuality, and how their lives are so much worse than everyone else's, which makes them important, and thus they must talk about it more.

    1. Re:Myspace-free by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      These online blogs tend to be filled with idiots. Xangas - for instance - are filled - plagued - with political blogs of 13 year olds with opinons that are devoid of intelligence and thought. They basically read "political" books and parrot the opinions fed to them in the books. And whenever anyone with a different opinion says so, they can't help but insult the hell out of each other until neither of them has any dignity left. I see this equally from both sides of the coin. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who can't form his or her own opinion has a worthless opinion.

      How is this any different than adult political discourse?

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    2. Re:Myspace-free by planetoid · · Score: 1

      The only difference I've seen is kids overuse the word "fascist", while adults go straight to Godwin's Law and use the nazis for their cliched hyperbole.

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  103. Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not about community. It is about marketing. If marketing is a way of life... whatever...

  104. Hawking quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "People who boast about their IQ are losers."
    -Stephen Hawking

  105. But most of all... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1
    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
  106. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away their rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia AC EULA albums post your rights!

  107. Myspace is a giant pile, but... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On one hand, I totally agree. Myspace is a giant pile. It's not reliable, the UI is horrible, every other member's site is littered with windows media files, it's owned by News Corp, etc.

    On the other hand, all of my old college friends are on MySpace. I've been able to keep in contact with people that I would have otherwise never heard from again.

    Unlike Friendster or Facebook, MySpace simply let people sign-up without jumping through hoops. You didn't have to be attending a university, you didn't have to be invited by a current member, etc. Consequently, a TON of people seem to be on MySpace now.

    The ability to see you friend's address books is a great idea.

    Now, if someone could make it less crappy, I'd be happy as hell. (google?)

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Myspace is a giant pile, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now, if someone could make it less crappy, I'd be happy as hell. (google?)
      Not likely - just look at Orkut....ugh

    2. Re:Myspace is a giant pile, but... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      I'd look, but no one has invited me :(

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  108. Re:I hope our youth likes giving away their rights by jZnat · · Score: 1

    No, but I've read some of the more commonly used ones (not just when the GPL, MPL, or another free license that I've read before is used as an "EULA") and seen where this sort of shit goes haywire.

    Yes, I need to get a life...

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  109. Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the parent of your post talking about teenagers specifically? Unless all your friends are teenagers in the ~12-15 range, you don't have much ground to stand on with regard to your "he's a troll" statement.

    And if they are 12-15, you have bigger problems than being a "piss-poor socializer outside of an ASCII environment".

  110. Re:What about World of Warcraft and the burgeoning by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

    I play FFXI, you insensitive clod.

    Seriously though, set it up as one of your "Communities."

    --
    Scott Swezey
  111. Distributed MySpace by dominion · · Score: 1


    I've been working on a project called Appleseed, which aims to be a distributed MySpace that anybody could set up a site and "connect" it to the rest of the appleseed sites.

  112. Hunting Deer == Homicidal by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when does hunting deer entail a "capacity for violence" against humans? That's bullshit, and the author ought to know it; he's probably a vegan.

  113. The only reaction that makes sense... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    *Hosiah scoops up handfull of peanuts and throws them to the sociologists...*

    Good monkeys! *applauds* You've managed to study yet another generation for twenty years in embarrassed silence before grunting yet another meaningless, irrelevant, generalized, stereotypical label. And what a relief! Our collection of generation X, Y, #, *, w, +, and 9? was getting low.

  114. Oh, God no... by niteskunk · · Score: 1

    Being 17, I have to say I'm ashamed of being part of a generation called "The MySpace Generation". Reason? Take a look at this bulletin posted by a friend.

    do not stop reading this or something bad will happen.

    One day, Sarah was walking home from school when her boyfriend drove by and honked at her to get in. She got in his car and he drove her to the lake. Her boyfriend said he was going to tell her something very important. Sarah could have sworn he was going to propose. However, he flicked her off, pushed her in the lake and yelled, "I am breaking up with you, you awful *!! I hate you and I think that maybe you should just end your * life! DUMB * *!!!" He laughed and drove off. It was a very cold day. Sarah climbed out of the lake, freezing cold, and feeling the worst she had in her entire life. She got home went in a hot bath, and slit her wrists and died in the bathtub. Her parents yelled and screamed at her to get out until they finally broke the door down. They saw no body, but the entire bathroom was dripping with her blood. Her mom went insane and killed herself three days later, her dad is in prison, accused of murder. Later that week, Sarah's exboyfriend was taking a shower when she came from the drain, rotting and bloody, with a razor in her hand and said "Goodbye Jason." She cut his throat before he could scream.

    If you do not repost this with the title "100 ways to break up", you are a heartless * and Sarah come to you in the shower from the drain, and will kill you the same way she killed her boyfriend.

    You have 13 minutes


    Point?

    Common sense isn't so common anymore.

    1. Re:Oh, God no... by The+Ilia · · Score: 1

      Jesus. The situation is worse than we thought. Code Bravo! Move out. Send in the containment team. Maybe someone needs to systematically destroy the computers of anyone who perpetuates those horrible, vile chain letters. They're just as bad as spam, and less entertaining.

      --
      All of the brightest boys, To play with the biggest toys - More than they bargained for...
  115. Funny How... by VaticDart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whenever there's a discussion on Slashdot that involves teenagers, the deeper you go into any particular thread there are more and more comments like this one. Given that language, aesthetics, all forms of art, the very forms of art themselves, forms of empirical knowledge (remember that modern science is based around a very particular, and ultimately arbitrary view of the way empiricism fits into the whole mind vs. matter issue), forms of inductive knowledge (math, computers, logic) and the very nature of "civilization" itself change over time, sometimes very quickly, what basis are you using to state that "kids are increasingly stupid"?

    The answer is that there is none. Every time a particular culture comes up with one, it is only relevant to that particular culture at that particular time. As the culture changes the ideals shift (see IQ tests), and as cultures die out, they simply become irrelevant, historical curiosities. There is no objective way or measuring Intelligence, because there is no one Intelligence, but rather a multitude, perhaps and infinite number of different intelligences, which can only be gauged by how well they "function" in the actual material world. Given that this "MySpace Generation" (what a lame name...) is making the next fold in US culture simply by being the generation that will be coming into power, I'm sure they will function very well. Each new generation creates its own new categories for functionality, and in the process of doing this, in their youth, are invariably declared a dysfunctional generation because they do things different than the previous generation.

    Making declarations like this shows that one is incapable of seeing that something is changing from what they are used to, comfortable with, without making an objective value judgement which is invariably wrong, and thereby showing themselves to possess a very small world view which is basically entirely occupied by their own personal view.

    Maybe this is why I spend more time reading my friend's MySpace blogs than Slashdot discussions like this one. They may not exactly be though provoking, but at least they're not dangerously stupid.

  116. bravo, well said by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the people you are responding to have historical myopia

    every generation that has ever lived looks at the teenagers around them and is scared that civilization is ending

    this was true in 4000 BC, it will be true in 4000 AD

    but, just as you said, civilization is not ending

    and just like you, i don't understand why these people are unfamiliar with what a teenager is

    have they forgotten what they were like?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:bravo, well said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. You assume that human society exists in this linear vaccum where everything just exists on the same lines of your modern thinking.

      It would seem that you are the one with historical myopia. The ancient societies were cohesive and the teenagers were not these angst-filled emoing dramatic douchebags that you see today. The density of these societies were much smaller as well. The average person did not have the huge social network like we have today.

      It is a common thread amongst many ancient civilizations to ponder the death of humanity but teenagers being the cause was not one of them. Their societies were built on hard and fast traditions that were well kept from generation to generation.

      I can go on with countless examples of why you are historically wrong, but its pointless. People using a narrow and sophomoric understanding of history is rather common.

  117. Being a teenage MySpace User... by JimXugle · · Score: 0

    Myspace is just a place to be whatever the hell you want. Nothing more. Nothing Less. Let there be music, disregard for copyright and risquee photos for all!


    I can see it now...


    Welcome to MySpace.com!
    Teaching an entire Generation CSS since 2003

    --
    -jX

    Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
  118. I like www.vivamigente.com by andy3 · · Score: 1

    For people who have lived abroad, immigrated or traveled for long periods of time, social networks are a handy tool. It allows you to seek and find people from your own country, state and city that may live near your new Location.

    Thats why i started my own, http://www.vivamigente.com/.

    I believe there is a need for such a website. Well see...Its BETA still.

    Andy

  119. nope by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    The ancient societies were cohesive and the teenagers were not these angst-filled emoing dramatic douchebags that you see today.

    teenagers are angst-filled emoing dramatic douchebags because of psychology, not sociology

    this is true if they grow up in tokyo or tierra del fuego

    and if they grew up today, thousands of years ago or thousands of years in the future

    and saying something like "ancient societies were cohesive" is the very definition of historical myopia: that chaos is something unique to today, and the past was simple and pat. you're not talking history, you're talking mythology

    you need to familiarize yourself with some basic ideas of human nature- the good, bad, and ugly, that are constant across time, geography and culture

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  120. that's weird by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    there was an article in slashdot a few months ago about how in all previous eras of humanity, there are always archives, because they are of real things: stone, paper, etc that fade with time but do not disappear and are usable by people directly

    but the era we live in will fade to nothing, because it's all just electronic bits... and even if a cd miraculously survives the degradation they say is inevitable, they say no one will know how to decipher it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's weird by MKalus · · Score: 1

      This may be true in a couple of hundred years, but most of the stuff a 17 year old puts on the net today will in all likelyhood still be around 30 years from now.

      Sure, an archelogist in 2580 will most likely not be able to learn that Danny had a crush on Anna in Highschool and how "whatever" their respective life's were but the hiring manager twenty years out will.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  121. Offenders... by ki85squared · · Score: 1

    Quote of the day:
    Mrs. Guild: "Tom, there's no MySpace in my classroom!"
    Tom: "This isn't MySpace. It's the Nevada Database of Registered Sex Offenders."

  122. oh man not again by sofaist · · Score: 1

    'Social Networking' was such a neat term, now it just means um, like a network, where people are social. Again specificity is the victim of people who can't be arsed to know what their saying.

  123. Well I met my future wife on Mypsace by moto-rider · · Score: 1

    She messaged me on Myspace, we talked, met in the real world *gasp* , things worked out.

  124. It's the language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm acting on behalf of my employer in a matter involving a legal services company. The last letter we recieved from them was poorly written, misspelled and lacking in punctuation. The individual drafting these letters has no apparent knowledge of civil law, no reasoning or comprehension skills and no idea of how hard we are about to bitch slap them.

    Have you any idea how frustrating it is trying to communicate with these morons? Are you really saying that we should let language deteriorate to the level of these online communities? Here is a legal threat in MySpace talk to help you decide the answer to these questions for yourselves.

    we are teh legal + shit, pay us legal costs cuz U sux Thx
    This is not just a stereotype, it is a fighteningly large percentage of the users. Isn't the prevelance of moron speak within online communities a sure sign that the education system is failing? Should we destroy thousands of years human development and reduce language to short gutteral sounds for the benefit of these idiots?
  125. Im 27 and I use Myspace all the time by Busy · · Score: 1

    And my only friend on there younger than 20 is my little sister. Most of the people I know follow the rule that you don't add someone as a friend unless you know them in real life of you're a fan of their music.

    I can also count at least 10 people that I had lost touch with in meatworld and probably would never have seen again if it weren't for myspace, I owe the awesome time I had at a party last night to an invitation from one of those guys.

    It's just a whole bunch of people who aren't geeks. (There's a few geeks on there too BTW) Lots of myspacers are whack, but lots of geeks are whack too, so deal with it. It's a social site, part of being social is putting up with the fact that there's LOTS of people around who suck or you don't see eye-to-eye with. It's also teaching (if slowly) non geeks how to develop some form of internet ettiquette(sp?) and bringing more people online. I like that, it's bringing more people closer to my level.

    I will await the reply from someone saying there is no ettiquette(sp?) on there from someone who doesn't use the site in the first place :)

    --
    Think of someone with average intelligence. Now think 1/2 the world is dumber than that guy.
  126. My Space by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 1
    It's funny that the title of the site is the complete opposite of what you get. Kind of like the "Happy Fun Goodtime" button being the trigger of an AK-47.

    That said, I think the entire site has some good and some bad in it, of course. The site is a great place for people to find others with similar interests, as a prior poster mentioned. Just like some people join clubs with the purpose of finding friends, myspace is just another "club."

    I've never been a strictly private person, keeping myself cloistered from human contact seemed foolish to me and I usually give away a bunch of details about my life, but nothing on the scale of most of the people on Myspace. That is the key to the whole thing though.

    The difference between a club and Myspace is that Myspace is often times freakishly personal, to the point where it seems like the person posting has absolutely no concept of privacy. Just like "Reality" televison, this is perhaps a symptom of our voyeur society.

    Have you ever have to stop when driving because everyone is looking at the scene of the crash? Ever watch the news, where most of the stuff they report is gruesome in order to capture your attention? (There is a lot to the news, this is just ONE aspect of it. If you want to bash the news, don't do it for JUST this reason.)

    This extends beyond just individuals too! The Information Age has seen the rise of the internet, of things like Google, but it has also spawned companies like Acxiom. Acxiom's mission is to "create and deliver customer and information management solutions that enable many of the largest, most respected companies in the world to build great relationships with their customers. Acxiom achieves this by blending data, technology and services to provide the most advanced customer information infrastructure available in the marketplace today." http://www.acxiom.com/default.aspx?ID=1636&Display ID=18

    It should be obvious to people that there are giant databases out there storing everything from what we buy to where we live, what our houses are worth, who are neighbors are, what kind of reputation we have, etc... The entire industry is dedicated to voyeurism, and of course they get away with it. Myspace is just another example of all this.

  127. Re:What about World of Warcraft and the burgeoning by philipkd · · Score: 1

    alright.

  128. He does it Han Solo style. by biologicalunit · · Score: 0

    I have a friend who has hooked up with at least a dozen women from myspace. I think myspace fills a need for a lot of slutty women who need to feel important. Plus they're just sluts to begin with. They're gonna get what they deserve!

  129. Mmmm... Astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just don't get it. Myspace is Friendster, only instead of yuppies, hipsters, and college students, it's populated by complete morons. All my friends from college and high school are on Friendster and/or Facebook.com.

    Do tell me more about this friendster and facebook phenomenon. It must be a whole new paradigm shift in abstract relationship building synergies!

    MySpace gets the lowest-life, most guido New Jersey and Long Island trash people I've ever seen, the teenagers who are too dumb to know any better, and a couple of pervs I know in their later 20s who just go there to pick up on dumb 17 year old girls.

    Yeah, and they gits lotsa niggers and wops too. Slashdot: Paragon of free thinking and tolerance.

    1. Re:Mmmm... Astroturf by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Very funny, asshole. Did I say _everyone_ on any of those sites conforms to that description? No. I just said it's populated primarily by those types. Friendster is the way it is because it was first, and tended to pick up early adopter types and the people they know. Doesn't mean everybody fits a neat stereotype, and I never said they do. But by definition of the way a social networking site works, they are only useful if there are other people "like you" there for you to connect up with, so in fact *they*, not me, are the ones that tend to reinforce the stereotypes of their communities.

      And as for MySpace - it looks like it's diversified quite a bit from what I saw there maybe 12 months ago looking at it today. Still a bit of that flavor, but a much more reasonable mix of people. But when I first went there, literally EVERY profile I saw fit the description in my original post and it left a very bad impression with me. I'm very tolerant of all sorts of different people, but I have little patience for that particular breed of illiterate moron that I referenced before.

      Yeah, and they gits lotsa niggers and wops too. Slashdot: Paragon of free thinking and tolerance.

      This fails to amuse me. Saying people are low class because they choose to conform to certain modes of speech, mannerism, and dress that suggest a lifestyle and priorities I find distasteful is not racism. Racism is about judging people based on factors they have no control over - the color of their skin and ethnic background. But if you say you won't judge people based on the choices they make about how they live their lives, then you are A) full of shit and B) abdicating your responsibility as an ethical human being to make judgments about the world around you.

    2. Re:Mmmm... Astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MySpace gets the lowest-life, most guido New Jersey and Long Island trash people I've ever seen, the teenagers who are too dumb to know any better, and a couple of pervs I know in their later 20s who just go there to pick up on dumb 17 year old girls.

      Yeah, and they gits lotsa niggers and wops too. Slashdot: Paragon of free thinking and tolerance.

      This fails to amuse me. Saying people are low class because they choose to conform to certain modes of speech, mannerism, and dress that suggest a lifestyle and priorities I find distasteful is not racism. Racism is about judging people based on factors they have no control over

      Last time I checked, being economically disadvantaged was something you are generally born into and have no control over. Here's a hint: If your school has metal detectors at the door, you aren't gonna be the next Bill Gates. Of course, to a yuppie like yourself, you don't see it that way. You were probably indoctrinated with the "Work hard and you'll make something of yourself" propaganda. You might as well be shouting "Let them eat cake!" Then again, you more than likely grew up in a cute little cul-de-sac in suburbia, so what do you know. Of course, I forgive you for that. It's a common mistake for an American to equate credit worthiness to success and intellect. That point of view, while ignorant, is understandable and forgivable.

    3. Re:Mmmm... Astroturf by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Yada yada yada. Again, you don't know anything about my background. You don't know crap about the circumstances I was brought up in. How somebody can make an ad hominem attack based on zero information is just beyond me. For several years, I attended some of the dingiest schools you can imagine, where I saw people beat and stab each other. They told me that I should forget about applying to Ivy League schools because nobody got into those colleges from this particular high school.

      Nonetheless, I went to an Ivy League university. In college, I met people who had been through far worse circumstances than I ever did in my mostly lower middle class upbringing, and yet managed to turn into functional, successful people (one fellow I met there grew up in the ghetto, saw his father shoot and kill his mother, and ended up at one of the top law schools in the country).

      In any case, it's nice to see that some people choose to believe your fate is determined for you by the circumstances of your birth, but I don't buy it because I've seen too many counterexamples. It may be nearly impossible to take the risks necessary to become a billionaire if you start with nothing, but that's a false standard of success. It's entirely plausible and not at all uncommon for somebody who starts with nothing to have a successful career, make more than enough money to live on, and provide their children with an environment that gives them all the opportunities in the world. I have seen dozens of examples of this among immigrant communities in the US.

      So keep blathering about my ignorance if you want, but I am empirically correct and you are provably talking out of your ass about me, a person of whom you know nothing. The wielder of an ad hominem attack is almost always guaranteed to be the loser of an argument.

  130. I think that this sums it up right here ... by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1
    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  131. Stupidity this year versus yesteryear by aricusmaximus · · Score: 1
    I don't think I can express in words how worried I am at the stupidity of the comming generation.

    I would personally worry about your own thought processes, in taking one data point and coming to such a broad conclusion. What if we created a study that took a representative sample average creative output of teenagers? I'm willing to bet we would see that the average "teenager creative output" (TCO) has been consistently crappy over the past decades. In fact, with better nutrition and education, I would bet it has improved significantly. This would parallel the James Flynn effect.

    From a biological perspective, these kids very likely are not much different from your generation -- so I'd strongly question any claim that their inherent intelligence levels are significantly different.

    In other words, humans are and will be acting (and expressing themselves) just as stupidly or cleverly as they ever did. This may be comfort for some, a source of horror and despair for others.
  132. HTML = XSS by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

    If you allow HTML, you allow JavaScript. Yahoo tries and tries to filter HTML in email and yet every now and than another trick emerges which allows JavaScript to be executed. And once you have JavaScript, you have the session cookies for all the people who read your email or visit your profile.

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  133. Brazil by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Probably nothing - unless you live in Brazil, where it is very popular. Nobody elsewhere seems to use it.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  134. Blame cellphones by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Isn't the prevelance of moron speak within online communities a sure sign that the education system is failing?

    That's actually open to interpretation.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  135. 2 Cents + Keyboard by IamCarrots · · Score: 1

    MySpace isn't a waste, but it's certainly not quality time spent either. In fact, it doesn't serve to do much beyond perpetuate social drama. Social, community, blah blah blah. This is a community, but at least I learn things here I would otherwise never know. MySpace is a shell of a premise packed with inane BS from across the globe. It's a fad and nothing more. It's certainly not cutting edge social commentary. However, I have heard local bands/businesses tend to promote their stuff via MySpace, and is rather effective in that manner. For as long as /. lives, I will continue to avoid such sites as it's not nearly as productive. Besides, I like reading coherent text, not hacked-up-leet-speak-dribble.

  136. USC student murdered dumped her baby in a dumpster by cheesy9999 · · Score: 1

    ...and the same thing happened, but with facebook instead of myspace. The media started reporting details of her profile. Here's an article about it...

    --
    -tom
  137. Re:USC student murdered dumped her baby in a dumps by cheesy9999 · · Score: 1

    Oops...the ARTICLE

    --
    -tom
  138. Re:Generation Colon by FacePlant · · Score: 1

    We will all become generation colon.
    It will happen around the time you turn 40.
    Don't piss off your doctor.

    --
    My Heart Is A Flower
  139. Lame, lame, LAME!!! by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is it with people that have to "label" this and that? Labeling is one thing but labeling a generation is about as useful as saying you're a Libra or some other zodiac symbol.

    Gen X, Gen Y, Gen @, Brat Pack, Rat Pack, etc. etc. It is so sickening and annoying.

    I am venting, I think the whole thing should be ignored. It's as useless and pointless as watching the E! channel. What CRAP!!!

    Pay attention to something of importance instead of media driven drivel.

  140. Whack World by sjvanders · · Score: 1

    its so weird that people get all worked up about myspace and teens on myspace and get all rude about it.
    i'd think it quite immature to be honest. i mean, if one doesn't appreciate a certain thing, they could voice their opinions but to degrade a generation or a class of people isn't a very mature thing to do. what then would make them different from the very teenagers they consider to be whiners and rubbish talkers.

    surely myspace, friendster, hi5 and the whole works aren't for some people. similarly, wikipedia and all those other community things.

    yep, teenagers eventually are going to grow up and become sensible adults (well most of them) but at least they have the opportunity to touch an entire world (electronically) compared to the days when all that connected anyone was CNN!

    remember ICQ and IRC. hmm.. funny world we live in.