Slashdot Mirror


Are Americans Addicted to Technology?

jomammy writes "According to a recent Wired article, the majority of Americans are becoming increasingly dependant on their gadgets. High speed internet seems to be the one most determined to be a 'necessity'. A third of the country is said to pay more than $200.00 a month for their addiction, where 4 out of 10 pay between $100.00 and $150.00 a month. Other items in this list of 'gadgets' include, mp3 players, dvd players, laptops, handhelds, etc." How addicted are we? How addicted are you?

359 comments

  1. Only $200/mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Posers!

    1. Re:Only $200/mo by strstrep · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where I am (Northeastern US) 1.5-5 Mbps is typical, though I have seen some higher priced residential services going to around 10 Mbps. Typically, there are no download limits or excess usage fees, but they reserve the right to reduce your bandwidth for "abuse." I haven't run into that problem yet---I don't use peer-to-peer applications, but I do download software for my Linux machines frequently. I think the "abuse" line is a tool for them to prevent people from saturating their connections 24/7 using peer-to-peer traffic or on hosts that have become zombies.

      Different ISPs have different policies regarding inbound traffic---one ISP near me allows all the ports I've tried inbound, whereas another blocks ports like 80 and 23.

    2. Re:Only $200/mo by TenLow · · Score: 1

      I have 9000kbps for $55 a month. Very slow upload. I'm actually shopping for a better deal. The price is just silly.

    3. Re:Only $200/mo by Freexe · · Score: 1

      I get 24,000kbps for £24/month in London.

      In relatity the max you can get is slower but it does have 1,300kbps upload.

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    4. Re:Only $200/mo by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 0

      30mbps download and 120 KBytes /sec upload through Optimum online. Kindof not standard though, but really nice anyway.

      --
      So you see what had happened was....
    5. Re:Only $200/mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get 10Mbps down/1Mbps up from them (Optimum Online); and afaik, the modems they provide only have a 10-T ethernet interface

  2. Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Help! I keep refreshing Slashdot! Oh no!

    1. Re:Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Was a Slashdot Zombie: http://www.ubergeek.tv/article.php?pid=1

    2. Re:Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by zee-mich · · Score: 2, Funny

      Help! I keep refreshing Tubgirl! Oh no!

      --
      i rock you.
    3. Re:Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by Poltras · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, I keep refreshing my user page.

    4. Re:Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by rolandog · · Score: 1

      I keep refreshing goatse... and lemon party... at the same time! Oh noes!!111

    5. Re:Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's nothing. i know some people who are so addicted to food, water, and oxygen, that they die if they go without them. sad really.

    6. Re:Ohh Ohhh! I'm So Addicted! by slimey_limey · · Score: 1

      Not as addicted as I'd like to be. :-( I buy hardware about twice a year at most.

  3. Addicted? by NaNO2x · · Score: 1

    Ha, I'm not addicted I can go all the way around the world without using any technology! (are we there yet?)

    --
    Utinam me logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.
    1. Re:Addicted? by munpfazy · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can go all the way around the world without using any technology!


      That's a mighty long swim.
  4. Spec-Tech-ular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "According to a recent Wired article, the majority of Americans are becoming increasingly dependant on their gadgets."

    And Japan is what? In the dark ages?

    1. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and europe doesnt like their cell-phopnes at _all_

    2. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by oobob · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot about Poland.

    3. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Mod parent up, it's a continent's last grasp at relevance. Or insane jealousy that a US based site is once again posting a study about... YOU GUESSED IT! AMERICANS! WEEEEEEEEE

    4. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Kpau · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay... I've had it with the moronic misuse of the word "addicted". I guess most of the West is addicted to electricity, indoor plumbing, and the ability to communicate with each other. I use the Internet for work, shopping, play, education, and research. It is a conduit. People who call this an addiction are just modern day Luddites or those refusing to come out of the water and check out the spooky "dry land". And what about all those "non-Western" countries that find the Internet vital to their infrastructure?

    5. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      Excactly. How many YEN they spend?

    6. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      or those refusing to come out of the water and check out the spooky "dry land". So what you're saying is, we need Kevin Costner to show people the internet is fun?

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    7. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      I guess most of the West is addicted to electricity, indoor plumbing...

      I don't know why, but your post gave me the vision of a man wearing a trenchcoat, standing in a dimly-lit, alley. He beckons me over, opening up the coat just a bit so that I can see a gleaming white porcelain toilet concealed within, as the man says, "C'mon, hit a sample, man, I gotwatchaneed here..."

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    8. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by bdulac · · Score: 1

      I think the point being that if we become so dependent on technology then it's not us using technology but technology using us. Most Americans take for granted that we have the Internet, cell phones, pcs, tvs and all the modern conveniences this world has to offer. The reality is that without these gadgets we wouldn't even know HOW to do our job or function at school. This is where I see a problem with technology "addiction" if you'll call it that.

      --
      Peace is not the absence of trouble but the presence of God.
    9. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fun to see the term WEST being so misused by Americans when referring to themselves. It's like using 'America', a continent name, to call their own country.

    10. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by Kpau · · Score: 1

      This is like saying we're addicted to tools... fire is a tool. Without fire, we're definitely worse off. For better or worse, our species is defined by its use of tools and the effect tools have had on our evolution. To a great degree, this is no different than folks whining about some people being addicted to the bow and arrow .... while they keep banging the rocks together and wondering why they're not getting the food. Our tools *might* do us in one day.... just like most species have come to an end because of some inability to adapt or an overspecialization. From that respect, introduction of new tools should be looked at critically ... but so should the decision NOT to introduce new tools.

    11. Re:Spec-Tech-ular. by bdulac · · Score: 1

      I still think of some young people I've worked with who have become so reliant upon the "tool" itself that they failed to be able to accomplish on their own what the "tool" was created to help them do. First example: A 19 yr. old who's hand writing was barely legible at best because he had used a PC to type out his school work since the 6th grade! Come on, I don't have a problem with using a PC but I DO have a problem with not being able to even write the letters on your keyboard with a pencil! Second example: A 24 yr. old who didn't even know what 6x4 is since he'd used a calculator since the 4th grade. Again, there' nothing wrong with a calculator as a "tool" but let't not allow the "tool" to tell us what the answer is without some point of refernec for ourselves. It was the need for these "tools" that lead to the industrial revolution and our current digital age so yeah I am concerned that it's really more than an "addiction" with technology and has become an "obsession" to become more and more lazy and to allow computers to do all the work for us physically and mentally while we play our Xbox and listen to our iPod.

      --
      Peace is not the absence of trouble but the presence of God.
  5. addiction by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can quit any time I want.

    1. Re:addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Well I can stop posting to slashdot any time I want!

    2. Re:addiction by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 1

      Me too! *Puts crackberry behind back* No really... *takes ear buds out of ears* I swear I can! *turns off PSP* Just give me a chance *hangs up on cell phone* Oh, I admit it, I'm seriously addicted. I am the ghost of gadgetless past...

    3. Re:addiction by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco doesn't like quitters posting on his blog

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:addiction by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bender? Are you jacking on in there?

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    5. Re:addiction by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I told my wife "To prove how much I love you, I'd give up the internet for a year. To prove how much you love me, you won't ask me to."

    6. Re:addiction by rgoldste · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quitting is easy. I've done it several times already.

    7. Re:addiction by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd have to say that "addiction" is a badly overused term these days. Anytime someone has a bad habit, they'll call it an addiction, as if doing so removes any responsibility for changing their behavior.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    8. Re:addiction by DCstewieG · · Score: 5, Funny

      I brought up a similar rhetorical question with my girlfriend....boy was that barking up the wrong tree. I hope you got a better response than me! We're fine but that night was a bit awkward.

    9. Re:addiction by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Love means never asking your partner to prove it.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    10. Re:addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody likes a quitter period.

      Now I'm off to have a smoke with my gin and juice, while playing solar wars on my Palm phone, while DVDshrink finishes running in Wine, under Suse 10, on my dual opteron workstation. If only I had some greenbud...

    11. Re:addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm addicted, yes. I'm addicted to enjoying shit.

    12. Re:addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I can and it's not anyone elses business anyways.

    13. Re:addiction by Harker · · Score: 1

      Same here. In fact, I'll even schedule a time to quit.

      Now, where's my PDA?

      H.

      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    14. Re:addiction by Mike+Peel · · Score: 1

      But she didn't need to ask you, you volunteered!

    15. Re:addiction by mildgift · · Score: 1
      I'd have to say that "addiction" is a badly overused term these days. Anytime someone has a bad habit, they'll call it an addiction, as if doing so removes any responsibility for changing their behavior.

      You really misunderstand the addiction and recovery "movement." The whole point is to recognize that something is an addiction, that it's messed up your life, and then change your behavior. What addicted people do is acknowledge that individual will, alone, is not enough for them to change their behavior, and that they need help from the group, insight from others, and (ugh) help from a higher power. The whole point, however, is changing behavior by any means necessary.

    16. Re:addiction by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I tell you that I love you
      Don't test my love
      Accept my love
      Don't test my love
      Because maybe
      I don't love you
      All that much

      -Dan Bern

      KFG

    17. Re:addiction by tacocat · · Score: 1

      Admitting you have a problem is the first step...

      IMHO, I think many Americans are addicted to technology. It's fits in with the Keeping up the the Jones' ideology.

    18. Re:addiction by jonathan_the_ninja · · Score: 1

      Jecht
      "I can quit drinkin' whenever I want!"

      Tidus
      "Then do it now."

      Jecht
      "What did you say?"

      Tidus
      "You just said you can!"

      Jecht
      "Heh. Tomorrow, maybe."

      --
      I love NetHack.
    19. Re:addiction by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      Addiction is a poorly-defined word. In fact, it means very little at this point.

      It used to be reserved for OCD-type behaviors where the individual would continue engaging in an activity clearly detrimental to his or her well-being, such as using cocaine or heroin, gambling excessively, overeating, etc. Now the word has morphed to include behaviors that individuals would simply rather not stop doing, like listening to an IPod or watching television, even if doing so would make their pockets fatter or spouses happier or what have you. The difference is in the intensity of the desire and the ramifications of the behavior.

      Unless you've ever been addicted to something in the old sense of the word, it's difficult to distinguish between the two.

    20. Re:addiction by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      Love means never asking your partner to prove it.

      Shoot, and here I thought that love meant cleaning up the barf and poop your children seem to shoot out at the most inconvinent times... without your spouce saying a thing.

    21. Re:addiction by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      The whole point, however, is changing behavior by any means necessary.
      Rather than, you know, leaving people to their free will and all, since it's only encouraging them to sin anyway.

    22. Re:addiction by theapodan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the problem is that your girlfriend is a tree.

      Not to mention you were barking at her.

      Find a sexy dog, that's more your alley.

  6. Pfft by seinman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, please. This is just more useless drivel written to sell magazines. Just because something makes your life easier or more fun, doesn't mean everyone is "addicted" because they enjoy using it. Are Americans adicted to tooth brushes, too? 99% of us admit to using them at least daily! OH NO!

    1. Re:Pfft by umbrellasd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, internet is becoming a public utility. It's like saying that the phone is an addictive device. I suppose it could be. So could anything whether it's a technology or not. Are you addicted to a juicer? A blender? Are you addicted to a hammer (maybe you're a carpenter and can't live without one). Not a very insightful article.

      I read a lot of books. Guess that's a technology since it requires a printing press. Guess I'm an addict.

    2. Re:Pfft by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think a more compelling question would be: Is all this technology making us more productive? Or does it simply facilitate our slacking off with more diversions?

    3. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. I see you don't include Alabama or West Virginia in your poll of toothbrush use...

    4. Re:Pfft by Cmdr_earthsnake · · Score: 1

      Both, if you look at the creative pro's who make movies and stuff, a good PDA would just add to their creativity.

      In the hands of the wrong person (not suggesting who that may be) it might just be taken apart and/or smashed or used to send useless texts to friends and browse slashdot all the time :P... and so forth.

      --
      #!/bin/bash
      login root
      chmod 775 universe://
    5. Re:Pfft by kebes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. We are not "addicted" to technology or gadgets or music or food or any number of other things that enrich our lives. I have a friend in psychology (actually neuroscience), and he often emphasises that in diagnosis, the difference between "something you like" and "addiction" is "does it disrupt the person's ability to live their life?" If the thing in question makes the person do questionable things, hurt themselves, or otherwise make it difficult for them to live a normal and happy life, then it is addiction (similarly, most psych conditions, like "depression" are analyzed in terms of how much it affects a person's ability to live their life, achieve their goals, etc.).

      All of this to say that you cannot classify our like of technology as an "addiction." Are we selling our first-born children in order to satisfy our lust for new gadgets? Hardly. Is this fixation with technology making it difficult for us to live our lives? No. (In fact the technology sometimes makes our lives easier--hence it is a (partially) pragmatic desire.)

      I find the hyperbole of "we are addicted to X" annoying (where X, these days, is often "video games" or "the internet" or whatever). I don't go into convulsions when I don't read slashdot for a day. I am employable and happy. I certainly wouldn't be stealing TVs and selling them on the black market in order to satisfy my insane lust for slashdot...

    6. Re:Pfft by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I think a more compelling question would be: Is all this technology making us more productive? Or does it simply facilitate our slacking off with more diversions?

      What a strange way to think of life. Is life all about being "productive"? I'd have thought the gadgets are supposed to make our lives better, however you wish to define better. Making it more productive makes it sound as if the only purpose to being alive is work and produce a product. Is that really what you think it's all about?

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:Pfft by TheSixth1 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the article is useless drivel with the word addiction thrown in to alarm/titilate/intrigue a reader to sell more magazines.

      What Wired is calling "addiction" is, IMHO, a natural result of an increase in disposable income that American consumers are earning. According to figures from the US Census Bureau, there has been nearly a [pdf alert] 300% increase in disposable income since 1980. What Wired calls addition I call a market economy that is providing cool toys for a growing popution that can afford to buy them and spend time playing with them.

      Now, if I can only figure out how to use census data to explain/justify Ever-crack addiction...

    8. Re:Pfft by flyonthewall · · Score: 4, Funny

      Until you reach the magic number of 42 it is.

      Squeek!

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    9. Re:Pfft by GuildPort · · Score: 0
      I think a more compelling question would be: Is all this technology making us more productive? Or does it simply facilitate our slacking off with more diversions?
      I suppose it's a more compelling question if you define yourself by how much of an angle you can get when bending over for the man.
    10. Re:Pfft by dogwelder99 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm hopelessly addicted to technology, I'm just behind the curve. I'm spending over a hundred a month on electricity, and when there's an outage, all my personal habits are affected. If I spend more than a week or two without using a telephone, my life gets completely snarled up. If I go too long without health care technology like bloodwork or flu shots, my body gets physically sick! Please, can't someone help me?

    11. Re:Pfft by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is all this technology making us more productive?

      Ah, how I wish I could take you back in a time machine to the late 60's, then the 1920's. On our first stop in the 60's, I'd take you around various companies and show you the massive number of keypunchers, programmers, analysts, and other Managment Information Systems people who keep their companies working. I'd then take you to a company too small for a mainframe and let you witness the poor fellows struggle with mountains of paperwork.

      On our next stop, we'd drop by the 1920's. No automation here. You can literally find hundreds of typists per company, all lined up in rows. Secretaries abound, filing documents left and right. Personal assistents follow company executives around, keeping track of every minor detail. In short, lots of manpower for a return that we can realize today with a few PCs and other electronic gadgets.

      I haven't even gotten into manufacturing, and how technology has changed the world there.

      In short, technology has made us more productive. It doesn't always seem like it with all the technological distractions we now have, but you have to understand that the efficiency of modern technology is what gives us time and energy for those distractions. The greatest challenge today is to find better ways of optimizing business and personal matters. All the low-hanging fruit has already been realized, so we're on to the difficult part of squeezing out efficiency a few percent at a time.

    12. Re:Pfft by flosofl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Making it more productive makes it sound as if the only purpose to being alive is work and produce a product.

      That's seems to be the pervading theme in our (US) culture. I work for a multi-national, and I can say that my contemporaries in Europe and SA don't have the same attitude. I'm not saying they do bad work or don't work hard. It's simply they seem to view work as a means to an end, where the US seems to view work as that end.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    13. Re:Pfft by Nivoset · · Score: 1

      Im addicted to food... the withdrawls of that are killer.... same with breathing..
       
        though actually. i do feel very off and wrong if i dont brish my teeth soon after waking or eating.. so i suppose in a way i am addicted.... but it isn't bad unless it becomes... scarry amounts of brushing....

      --
      Movies made by a crazy person

      http://www.youtube.com/marginalpro
    14. Re:Pfft by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

      Technology increases our efficiency easily in the areas of necessity. Most other technologies are there just to keep away the boredom. "oooh, wow! (5 seconds later) Damn, I'm bored. (looks around) Oooh, wow!" When the techno-gadgets start coming, the unsettling feeling of emptiness starts to set in...must go find new gadet.

    15. Re:Pfft by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      Are we selling our first-born children in order to satisfy our lust for new gadgets?

      Exactly which gadgets did you have in mind?

      --
      John
    16. Re:Pfft by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Informative
      What a strange way to think of life. Is life all about being "productive"? I'd have thought the gadgets are supposed to make our lives better, however you wish to define better. Making it more productive makes it sound as if the only purpose to being alive is work and produce a product. Is that really what you think it's all about?


      What a strange way of extrapolating productive.

      I didn't only mean work, I simply meant "Yielding favorable or useful results; constructive."

      It need not be work-related.

      Is excercise machine X (gadget) more productive (toward losing weight, staying healthy) than the simple and humble jumprope and stretching exercises/yoga/pilates/your_choice? The former being an expensive gadget and the other can be very, very cheap.

      IMHO, the cheap-o version is better in most cases.

      The purpose of gadgets should be making lives easier, but most of the time, the majority seem to exist for the purpose of being sold, with little regard to the end user - consider the UI and other factors.
    17. Re:Pfft by dpreston · · Score: 1

      Productivity tends to lead to a better "quality of life". While it obviously doesn't measure happiness, it surely can allow people to lead more successful, happier lives. In a country in which they are producing about 3% more GDP per year (U.S.), it allows people live a much more _prosperous_ life. One can make an argument that this is material and shallow even, but resources allow people to do what they wish to do in life -- whether or not they take advantage of it.

      Just as an example, in a country like Bangladesh and other countries likewise, they produce about 0.5% more per year (maybe less). Also, the U.S. government (I'm sorry, I wish I were more educated on foreign governments...) measures it's unemployment and social security benefits on a basis of what kind of goods the normal person requires to live a GOOD life. Haha, though, I'll give you that they may be small and not actually reach its goal, but that's the idea. In other words, the idea of productivity measuring the quality of life is not a completely alien concept.

    18. Re:Pfft by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Thank you Captain Obvious. I'll take over.

      Now we fast forward to 2005 and look at the latest technology helping us in our daily lives:

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004SPO3/ 103-6259078-8189458

      http://www.brandsonsale.com/cg-003691.html

      or my personal favorite:
      http://sandalsandsocks.typepad.com/soapbox/2004/05 /useless_gadgets.html

      Personally, I'd throw nosehair trimmers, most PDAs, and most feature-laden cell-phones in that bin.

    19. Re:Pfft by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 1

      By any chance, could I get you to repeat that one more time?

      Just let me get my boss on the phone real quick....

    20. Re:Pfft by Nutria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's seems to be the pervading theme in our (US) culture. I work for a multi-national, and I can say that my contemporaries in Europe and SA don't have the same attitude. I'm not saying they do bad work or don't work hard. It's simply they seem to view work as a means to an end, where the US seems to view work as that end.

      Three words: Puritan Work Ethic.

      Even if you're born in California, and your parents are New Age weirdos, the phrases "a little work never killed anyone" and "no one ever drowned in their own sweat" have been part of (European) America since 1620.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    21. Re:Pfft by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly right. We have become more efficient--so much so that the four day work week has been a serious economic consideration since the 80's. The reason is that we have so much technological leverage that the only alternative is to create mountains of useless garbage and convince people that they need it... oh, right, this would include all those technological gadgets. :) But wander through a super department store sometimes and ask yourself, if half of this stuff disappeared tomorrow, would anyone really miss it? Choice isn't of much benefit if most of what is being offered is bad, and it's hard to tell the difference. Even brand names mean nothing now; when was the last time you were able to buy a good pair of Levis? A lot of this stuff is just landfill--either nobody buys it, and it goes directly into the trash, or someone buys it, and discovers that it's trash shortly thereafter. Either way, it's garbage--wasted time, energy, and resources.

      But when you consider how much time people waste with technology, you should also consider that executives could and did waste the same amount of time via their manpower driven alternatives, requesting pointless information, endless re-edits of documents (requiring the secretarial pool to retype the same document, with minor changes, over and over,) and maintaining expensive entourages that required far more time to manage than you can spend instant messaging your friends. And I do mean required--you don't have to instant message your friends, but you did have to manage your staff.

      My wife worked at a law firm. The old lawyers, not comfortable with technology, used their computers to play solitaire, while dictating into tape recorders and getting secretaries to type the letter, over and over and over again as they read it and noticed mistakes. The younger lawyers typed their letters directly into their computer, edited it there, and got exactly what they wanted directly. The old guard took three days to produce the letter, the young ones took half an hour. The difference in efficiency, and sheer cost, is staggering. Of course, the old boys just passed these costs on to their clients...

    22. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read about the study, a little over a year ago, where they got a group of people to not use the internet for a few weeks. The subjects started showing signs of withdrawal after 2 weeks.
      As for me, heck, I've gone, well, sometimes two whole days without it. And when I go on vacation, sometimes I don't do email for a whole day!

    23. Re:Pfft by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      he only purpose to being alive is work and produce a product. Is that really what you think it's all about?

      It's what my boss thinks its all about. And I don't know about most people but what my boss thinks translates at some point into money which generally satisfys the mortgage and puts food on the table.

      If they manage to get this defined as an addiction then at some point the lawyers will be able to sue over it and your insurance may end up paying for treatments.

      It would be interestng to find out how they treat this addiction. Maybe drop you into the wilderness with a compass and a pocket knife. Once you have settled down and are successfully living off the land you are cured?

    24. Re:Pfft by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've noticed that all of the Bigmouth Bill Bass', Buck the Singing Deer Heads and barking flashlights that my company had purchased to improve productivity just haven't done the job.

      Apples and oranges...every decade has its technological wasteland.

      -h-

    25. Re:Pfft by rolfwind · · Score: 1
      Yes, I've noticed that all of the Bigmouth Bill Bass', Buck the Singing Deer Heads and barking flashlights that my company had purchased to improve productivity just haven't done the job.

      Apples and oranges...


      Odd, and here I thought the story had to do with Americans as consumers. Oh yes, it does!
    26. Re:Pfft by leviticai · · Score: 1

      In most early history classes they teach that the turning moment where we moved from being nomads, hunter/gatherers, and began to form civilizations was when our productivity increased and supported being capable of not spending all of our time working, gathering food. Everything you see in front of you is due to the use of tools intended to increase our productivity.

    27. Re:Pfft by xTantrum · · Score: 1

      its still a relevant study. when anything is new and begins to make headway into society, its only natural ppl deconstruct,scruitinize and analize it. I'd imagine just after the first car was invented headlines probably read somthing like "are we getting too lazy" it happens, though i understand your point, history though is only smiling at us.

      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
    28. Re:Pfft by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I think his question is more like "Are ringtones, iPods and Digital Cable making us more productive?"

    29. Re:Pfft by xTantrum · · Score: 3, Funny
      If the thing in question makes the person do questionable things, hurt themselves, or otherwise make it difficult for them to live a normal and happy life, then it is addiction
      so like a wife?
      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
    30. Re:Pfft by xTantrum · · Score: 1

      that attitude is reflected a lot in quebec, canada as well as there is a strong european history here. the attitude is more: work to live, not live to work.

      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
    31. Re:Pfft by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I went to Niger this summer, where I was even out of range of the nearest cell tower, had no electricity, and was surrounded by goats and chickens. I spent two weeks without most of the technology I'm used to, and that's a lot of technology.

      You know what? I didn't mind one bit. No withdrawl symptoms. Strand me in a city in the US though, and I'd start to feel the pain. It seems like it's partly a function of the environment.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    32. Re:Pfft by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Informative

      Productive.. product. When you're productive you're efficient at producing something. It's not a strange way of extrapolating the word at all, but exactly what the word means. It's also a word constantly used to describe work efficiency as in "increasing productivity", especially when technology is used.

      --
      AccountKiller
    33. Re:Pfft by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I kind of like slacking off. Anything that gives me new and interesting ways of slacking off is good. I think non-geeks call it entertainment.

    34. Re:Pfft by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, evidence suggests that the first agrarian societies had a much worse quality of life than the hunter gatherers. They had to work way harder (tending and defending crops), had less leisure time, were less healthy and died earlier.

      But yes, after we got over that productivity is definitely nice. Of course, if you're obsessed with it....

    35. Re:Pfft by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never worked in tech support.

    36. Re:Pfft by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not addicted to my MP3 player. I'm just anti-addicted to Clear Channel, and my MP3 player is the most convenient way to listed to music that doesn't come from a corporate playlist.

      I may check CNN and Slashdot several times a day when at work (or at home), but on vacations I don't even bother to take a computer. (You might even find me with a copy of the local paper!) I just find the internet, when readily available, to be the most convenient way to keep informed of news for me and things that matter to me.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    37. Re:Pfft by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I didn't only mean work, I simply meant "Yielding favorable or useful results; constructive."

      As yes. Results. Like in the private sector. If Jack is only playing so that he can work better then he isn't really playing is he?

    38. Re:Pfft by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Odd, and here I thought the story had to do with Americans as consumers. Oh yes, it does!

      In which case, your reply to the post that started this decent into tangency makes no sense at all.

      -h-

    39. Re:Pfft by TedRiot · · Score: 1

      In my native language the word that can be translated to addiction has a meaning in addition to psychological or physiological addiction such as drug addiction that means roughly means being dependant on something. I am not sure of the English language, but I think what the addiction here refers to is not that people get withdrawal symptoms from getting separated from their gadgets.

      I think the meaning is that the gadgets (and through them possibly the network) becomes part of you in a way your arms and legs are a part of you. When you lose your gadgets that have been extensions of yourself, you feel like some part of you has been amputated. The gadgets change the way we do things and when without them, we have to alter our behaviour to adapt to missing functionality.

      Have you tried to solve problems without having access to google, lately?

    40. Re:Pfft by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I like my feature laden cell phone. With google available to me anywhere I can answer even the most esotoric trivia questions that come up in a conversation. It's also a great time filler for those times of bordom, I can read through the news, check weather, etc. Just because something is "feature-laden" to you, and you don't understand how to use the features, doesn't mean that other people don't appreciate it.

      And what do you have against people with excessive hair in their nose? They need to look fashionable too!

    41. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is excercise machine X (gadget) more productive (toward losing weight, staying healthy) than the simple and humble jumprope and stretching exercises/yoga/pilates/your_choice? The former being an expensive gadget and the other can be very, very cheap.

      IMHO, the cheap-o version is better in most cases.


      As a former fat guy who is now decently non-fat and knows a couple people in the same condition, your HO is wrong in at least three cases that I know of. The feedback given by Machine X in the form of calories burnt or miles traveled is a very effective motivator. Excercise is tedious. Attaching an ever-increasing number to it is extremely psychologically helpful, and all Machine X's that I've seen do that for you. Many of them also decrease joint pain over the non-gadget version of the excercise, and if you've never excercised day after day as a 300 pound guy, it tends to be really, really tough on the joints.

      I spent 1000 bucks on the fancy excercise equipment, and I'd do it again in a hearbeat, so please, if you have fat friends who would rather not be, don't give them that advice unless they're very, very poor.

    42. Re:Pfft by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are ringtones, iPods and Digital Cable making us more productive?

      Do flourescent lightbulbs make for better sandwiches?

    43. Re:Pfft by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Productive.. product. When you're productive you're efficient at producing something. It's not a strange way of extrapolating the word at all, but exactly what the word means.
      I think someone needs to use a dictionary.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    44. Re:Pfft by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      They obviously never read Heart of Darkness. Live to work. There isn't much else to do really.

    45. Re:Pfft by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      What a strange way to think of life. Is life all about being "productive"?
      For me, yes. Why is that strange? Don't you want to accomplish something in your life? Don't you set goals and then work to achieve them? I do.

      I've just started learning German. Having access to the net has certainly helped with that, if not just to read reviews of training materials and find local people who speak the language that I can interact with. I'm going to be more productive in my learning as a result.

      I'd have thought the gadgets are supposed to make our lives better, however you wish to define better.
      I define better as more productive, among other things. Maybe you should read the definition. You seem to be focused only on the aspect that productivity must produce a tangible good. Personally I'm willing to embrace anything that will help me be more productive in my daily life and therefore improve my quality of life. If I must produce a product then that product is a better me.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    46. Re:Pfft by bprime · · Score: 1

      Yes, totally. Look at the figures - $200 a month for their 'addiction'? That's $2400 a year. A decent laptop, or a home theatre setup, or a nice new TV, or a new computer for your college-bound daughter ONCE A YEAR easily eats that up once you get all the fixings in there - especially if they're counting monthly cell phone bills, etc. This is hardly doing the Hastings Street Shuffle down to NCIX to get your weekly fix of PC3200.

    47. Re:Pfft by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, you consider this (my) post which came before those others:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=172103&thresho ld=-1&commentsort=3&tid=126&mode=thread&cid=143305 16

    48. Re:Pfft by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Even if you're born in California, and your parents are New Age weirdos, the phrases "a little work never killed anyone" and "no one ever drowned in their own sweat" have been part of (European) America since 1620.

      But when your heart stops when it can't take the stress anymore... that will kill you. And it could be argued that living means more than just breathing, and making work and productivity top priorities hinders doing those more important things.

      I guess the real question is, are Americans addicted to work, productivity and profits ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    49. Re:Pfft by shawb · · Score: 1

      From what I recall, evidence shows that we still work longer than the hunter gatherers. Experimental archaeologists have pretty much shown that neolithic pre-agricultural man worked (being making hunting tools, hunting, preparing food, preparing living spaces, etc) about 2-3 hours a day.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    50. Re:Pfft by shawb · · Score: 1

      Ringtones can be used to differentiate different callers, and allow the person recieving tha call to decide whether or not to answer the phone without even looking at the screen: potential productivity increase.

      Ipods can allow people to relax more fully in their short break, returning to work more refreshed and able to get the job done. They can also be used to block out distracting sounds: potential productivity increase.

      Digital cable generally comes with a dvr these days, so people can watch the shows they want at anytime, freeing them from the confines of the network schedule. Commercials and irrelevant parts can also be fast forwarded. Less time spent zoning out in front of the TV to get the amount of entertainment you want -> More time available for productive activities -> potential productivity increase.

      To find whether or not people actually use these technologies in a productive manner, that would take a lot of study. But it is feasible that they could be used by people to increase efficiency and therefore productivity. I know that I always used to forget important dates before I had a cellphone with a calendar that reminded me. Having a date marked on a paper calendar does no good if you don't regularilly check said calendar. My cellphone is almost always with me, so I will get the alarm that someone's birthday is coming up, or to remind myself to tell my boss about some great idea I had or...? True, if the phone breaks then I currengtly lose all that info, but backups are just another technological innovation away.

      This all comes down to: we are becoming more and more dependant on technology to go about our day to day business. This is a trend that started when manking first made flint arrows (actually, it started even before then when we sharpened a stick to use as a weapon/hunting tool.)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    51. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do flourescent lightbulbs make for better sandwiches?

      Of course. You can shake the flour out of the tubes, add a little milk, sugar and yeast, heat and there you go !

      It's more difficult with fluorescent tubes, though.

    52. Re:Pfft by shawb · · Score: 1

      This comment isn't that far off. The neurological pathways which exist that allow for addictive behaviors to arise are currently thought to exist in order to facilitate pairbonding, or what modern society has come to call "love."

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    53. Re:Pfft by Vellmont · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think someone needs to understand that dictionaries are references sources, not definitive answers on word definitions.

      --
      AccountKiller
    54. Re:Pfft by mildgift · · Score: 1

      >I guess the real question is, are Americans addicted to work, productivity and profits ?

      No. Americans are hooked on punishing the poor. With enough of that abuse, people learn to get addicted to life-saving work habits.

    55. Re:Pfft by mochan_s · · Score: 1
      I spent 1000 bucks on the fancy excercise equipment, and I'd do it again in a hearbeat, so please, if ...

      I think you spend $1000 and you're trying to justify it to yourself.

      You can easily count the number of skips on a jumprope and multiply by calories in a spreadsheet. No need to have fancy equipment.

      You lost weight because you wanted to lose weight and worked towards it; not because a fancy calorie readout helped you.

      Maybe in the future machines will become so good that they will know how to motivate. But, for now, in my opinion it's only done to make money. And, you spending $1000 on it sort of exemplifies it.

      On the other hand, those $100 running shoes are totally totally worth it. There are a lot of technologies which are quientisential and others are just marketing onuses to make money.

      Plus, exercise does not have to be hard work. There were times when I used to run around all day in the park playing sports with my friends and during that time there was nothing else I would have rather done. It was great great fun.

      Anyway, the exercise industry is 99% marketing driven I think.

    56. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you spend $1000 and you're trying to justify it to yourself.

      Actually, I didn't. I fibbed a bit. I was unemployed at the time, and my parents bought it for themselves. I borrowed it. But if I had it to do over again, I'd shell out the cash myself.

      You can easily count the number of skips on a jumprope and multiply by calories in a spreadsheet.

      60 jumps per minute, 40 minutes per day = in-brain increment 2400 times. That's going to get very annoying very fast. I know I never would have done it.

      You lost weight because you wanted to lose weight and worked towards it

      Yes.

      not because a fancy calorie readout helped you.

      No. I realize the sample size is pretty small, but in at least one and probably at least 3 cases, it did help quite a bit.

      But, for now, in my opinion it's only done to make money. And, you spending $1000 on it sort of exemplifies it.

      Well, yes, both things are true, but again, it was worth it.

      On the other hand, those $100 running shoes are totally totally worth it.

      I wouldn't know, because, funnily enough, I run barefoot, which is a lot easier on a treadmill than on the street.

      Plus, exercise does not have to be hard work. There were times when I used to run around all day in the park playing sports with my friends and during that time there was nothing else I would have rather done. It was great great fun.

      I'm sure. I used to enjoy that, too. Then I got very, very fat, and it became impractical.

      Anyway, the exercise industry is 99% marketing driven I think.

      You're right, and 99% of it is worthless crap. But please trust me when I say that for at least some people, they are better than the zero-tech stuff.

    57. Re:Pfft by jeffskyrunner · · Score: 1

      I think we slack off the same amount, but in the time that we are working, we are MORE productive.

      --
      Jeff
    58. Re:Pfft by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      In english "dependent" might be a better translation then. "Addicted" generally has negative connotations in that you're making(or willing to make) sacrifices that lead to a negative effect on your life because of the object or behavior in question.

      Because of the drug war, the meaning of "addiction" has been distorted. A person can be dependant on pain killers because of injury, for example. Without them his ability to function is adversly impaired. An addict would be one that doesn't have a condition requiring regular dosage, who is willing to risk things like their job, career, health, life, family, or freedom for that next dose. Then there's always the question of who determines what's 'harmful', what's taking a 'risk'.

      We're "dependent" on technology. If we lost access to it our lives would be very much for the worse. We're not addicted in the sense that we'd violently protest it's removal. Heck, we'd give it up in a moment for something better.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    59. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, how I wish I could take you back in a time machine to the late 60's, then the 1920's. On our first stop in the 60's, I'd take you around various companies and show you the massive number of keypunchers, programmers, analysts, and other Managment Information Systems people who keep their companies working. I'd then take you to a company too small for a mainframe and let you witness the poor fellows struggle with mountains of paperwork.

      Ahh, you must come and visit our company, where our employees
      are carefully constructing fluffy items for consumers.

    60. Re:Pfft by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      We might be more "productive" though. After all, only a very small proportion of us work at useful things like producing food these days.

    61. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >um... if you are doing 60 jumps per minute, 40 minutes per day = in-brain increment 2400 >times. That's going to get very annoying very fast.

      no it wouldn't...

      because you only have to do the math once, and you already did it! see? even if you vary your workout, you'd only have to check your watch at the end to figure out about how many you did. it's not like calorie burning is exact - so rounding your numbers isn't going to really affect your overall results.

    62. Re:Pfft by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... more productive laywers ... just what the world needs ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    63. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize that, but you need that number and an awareness of the time anyway for pacing purposes or else you'll slow down without noticing it.

    64. Re:Pfft by brandizzle · · Score: 1

      Picture this: One magazine that has "AMERICANS ARE ADDICTED" on the front. One magazine that has "AMERICANS ARE DEPENDENT" on the front. Which do you think would sell more?

    65. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the first step in recovery is admitting you have a problem. Da'Nile is not just is river in Egypt.

    66. Re:Pfft by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      And that's why they used that word...

      It's like that Ironic song when none of the examples are ironic.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    67. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I recall, evidence shows that we still work longer than the hunter gatherers. Experimental archaeologists have pretty much shown that neolithic pre-agricultural man worked (being making hunting tools, hunting, preparing food, preparing living spaces, etc) about 2-3 hours a day.

      Yeah, but our kids get to actually grow up. And people older than 40 aren't "retired" to whatever predator is closest on hand. And most of us don't sustain crippling injuries before we're 20 that cause us pain for the rest of our life (all 10-20 years of it). Oh, and we get to read books and play video games and go to movies and eat a wide variety of food and get to know more than the 15 people in our own tribe. And we don't generally feel obligated to kill anyone else who wanders by.

      I think our quality of life is generally a lot better than back then, but then I'm biased. I'm already 35 ... even if I had survived childhood I would be approaching The End by now.

    68. Re:Pfft by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Are we selling our first-born children in order to satisfy our lust for new gadgets?

      Exactly which one of my wives' first born did you have in mind?

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    69. Re:Pfft by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Why don't people ever ask for the second-born children?

      Aren't they somewhat scarcer, and therefore more valuable?

      And why would you want people's *children* anyway? Then you have to change their diapers, make them do their homework, cook their meals, argue with them about their choice of friends ... isn't that a bargain likely to backfire?

      I mean, parents have to pay somone big money to look after their kids part time, and you are offering to do it full time for free? I'll pass on the first-born, thanks. Cash works for me.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    70. Re:Pfft by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the future machines will become so good that they will know how to motivate

      That's what the ever-increasing price tags are for!

      "Oh, crap. I spent two grand on that giant hamster wheel. I guess I should use it rather than watching the Trading Spaces rerun."

      Of course, this only works for a short time.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go get my laundry off my weight bench. ;)

    71. Re:Pfft by Kizeh · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this seems to be the typical American way of looking at life nowadays. The purpose of life is to be a cogwheel in the great machine, and quality, let alone non-performance related indicators of quality are often ignored. I just want to get to where I can start pushing the buttons. All this turning is making me dizzy.

  7. the first step is admitting you have a problem by cygnus · · Score: 4, Funny
    How addicted are we? How addicted are you?
    shut up shut up shut up!!

    :)

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  8. Completely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could not exist without my coffee grinder.

  9. Re:well by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    No, that's lack of skill.

  10. "News" by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 1
    "The internet connection is my lifeline," said Jennifer Strother, a mother of two young children who lives in Smithfield, Virginia. "It's the connection to friends, e-mail -- especially for stay-at-home moms. I'm hungry for adult conversation and any news that isn't Dora the Explorer or Blue's Clues."

    I've always thought that Barney was a much more reliable news source. Of course, not that Fox News is any more usable.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
    1. Re:"News" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      decoded
      sigs are for teh lusers

  11. How addicted? by PasteEater · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I'm on vacation and I'm reading Slashdot.

    That about says it all.

    --
    There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    1. Re:How addicted? by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      That's totally normal. When you do it in school, now that's bad. (I always post and read in my 5th period class)

      --
      I am Spartacus
    2. Re:How addicted? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Its almost midnight Friday and I'm checking Slashdot on my pager... I got it under control... No really.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  12. Hey.. by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are Americans Addicted to Technology?

    They misspelled 'porn'.

    1. Re:Hey.. by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      And 'humans' too.

    2. Re:Hey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did you... it's pr0n. You know, the v1agra alternative.

      And for the record, it's not an addiction; it's a lifestyle choice.

  13. Tecfhnology itself is addicting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Sri Lankan. I can tell you I'm sitting here in Sri Lanka reloading slashdot, digg, and engadget all the time. Why? Because I like technology and gadgets too. I'd be nowhere without a cellphone or laptop. Even when I travel outside my town. A local cell phone company (not even the best one) recently boasted over 10% of the population was their customer.

    Technology improves quality of life, so why shouldnt we utilize it? Isn't that the whole point?

  14. Wow, I can see it now... by Hydryad · · Score: 0

    "My name is Bob, and I have been without the compulsion to constantly check my email for a month now."
    "Everybody clap for bob!"

    It is already happening, but I could quit whenever I want! Honest!

    --
    No sig for you, two weeks!
  15. Addicted? Or Dependant? by taskforce · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Does dependant necessarily == addicted?

    If this is the case, am I addicted to food?

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    1. Re:Addicted? Or Dependant? by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      I think the coloquial use of the word "addiction" implies no dependence, but dictionary.com says (sorry, I didn't renew my OED)

      "
            1. To cause to become physiologically or psychologically dependent on a habit-forming substance: The thief was addicted to cocaine.
            2. To occupy (oneself) with or involve (oneself) in something habitually or compulsively: The child was addicted to video games.
      "

      I'd say by both definitions, you ARE addicted to food. You're physiologically dependant on food, and you habitually occupy yourself with it. Ergo you are both dependant and addicted.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    2. Re:Addicted? Or Dependant? by CarnivorousCoder · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I ought to kick that sleep habit. I'm woefully dependent on sleep.

      --
      What are you doing now, you lazy drunken obscene unsayable son of an unnameable gipsy obscenity?
    3. Re:Addicted? Or Dependant? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, am I addicted to food?

      Yes, you are. So what? Addictions aren't always bad.

    4. Re:Addicted? Or Dependant? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Probably.

      If you give up food, withdrawl is going to be a bitch.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  16. In other news by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    I think what they're trying to say is that we are addicted to out little electronic gadgets. (Time for me to get off the computer and go back to having a real life) Literally speaking, technology has been around since man learned to craft a spear from sticks and flint.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  17. Yes, yes we are. by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And this is NOTHING to be concerned about. Technology is defined as: " 1. The application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives. 2. The scientific method and material used to achieve a commercial or industrial objective. " Ok - FIRE is a technology. So are things as simple as forks, or spoons, or plates. The human race is addicted to technology, for better or for worse. America's only addicted to the most recent advancements more than the rest of the world. There is nothing wrong with this "Addiction" - They say it like it's a bad thing. Without technology, we'd still be running around like apes.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:Yes, yes we are. by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Without technology, we'd still be running around like apes.

      Even with technology, most still run around like apes.

      How many use the technology without regard for how it works? An ape who picks up a twig to catch termites is using technology.

      Most don't care to understand technology, they are only interested in consuming it. If all were lost tomorrow, how long would it take for us (humanity) to return to this (our current) level of technology? 2000 years?...more?

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    2. Re:Yes, yes we are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Thanks to recent advancements, now we use Segways.

    3. Re:Yes, yes we are. by Lesrahpem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, I'd say we are addicted to technology. We're a narcissistic people who are obsessed with the things we have created. I don't mean just Americans, I mean humans in general. It's perfecttly normal. The only way it becomes dangerous is when we reach a point where we rely on technology so much we literally could not survive without it.

      People can say all they like about technology causing people to slack off, but there is no reason why it shouldn't. Why build things that can make work easier when we can build things that remove the need for work? They say that modern civilization is only possible because we have an abundance of food and can spend our time on other endeavors. We are now experiencing what will turn into an abundance of time. After enough time passes we will eventually reach a level of advancement where we won't need to work anymore, and will have developed safe guards so that we don't have to worry about losing our technology. This, of course, is assuming that we don't blow ourselves up first.

    4. Re:Yes, yes we are. by GuildPort · · Score: 0
      Most don't care to understand technology, they are only interested in consuming it. If all were lost tomorrow, how long would it take for us (humanity) to return to this (our current) level of technology? 2000 years?...more?
      Well you see, that all depends. I'm betting that a big guy with a purple mohawk, driving around in a dune buggy converted for post-apocalyptic, highway combat will make some geeky engineer type his bitch. That will last until Mel Gibson (who would have been a police officer at the time), comes along and rescues him, along with a whole village of militant cave children and Tina Turner. From there, we will be able to rebuild a seriously hot retro 80's world WITH all the gadgets. So no, not 2000 years. Idiot.
    5. Re:Yes, yes we are. by xTantrum · · Score: 1
      America's only addicted to the most recent advancements more than the rest of the world
      you ppl always thing you live in a vacume *rolls eyes* tell your comment to ppl in korea where they are deploying cellphones faster than consumers could even want, a short range wireless systems that makes uwb look like dial up. tell that to ppl in africa when they use car batteries to charge their cell phones so they can call a the clients to come pick up their fresh fish of the day - as they take it from the ocean. most important tell it to japan who is LIGHT YEARS AHEAD OF AMERICA!!! jesus i don't want to be a troll but WAKEUP, its not all about you.
      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
  18. Addicted - HA! by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    How addicted are you?

    I don't have any problems with addiction. In a weird coincidence though, if I'm away from my computer for more than 10 minutes mysterious bugs appear and start crawling under my skin. Weird, huh?

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  19. You say it like it's a bad thing... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but is it, really? Yes, we're dependent on our technology, but calling it an "addiction" is merely one perspective. Instead, couldn't we just as easily call it symbiosis? It could be that we're taking the first steps towards becoming cyborgs, or something.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:You say it like it's a bad thing... by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      "Addiction is defined by continued behavior in the face of adverse consequence." -Dr. Drew

      Until we have some adverse consequence, one that's not immediately offset by the actual benefits technology brings to our lives, we can't even start referring to this as addiction.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    2. Re:You say it like it's a bad thing... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It could be that we're taking the first steps towards becoming cyborgs, or something.

      Actually, our ancestors took those first steps several hundred thousand years ago, when they started chipping stones to make them better cutting (or killing) tools. Then they progressed to searching out flint, quartzite and volcanic glass to make even more high-tech cutting tools.

      Since then, we've become hopelessly dependent on our technology. If stripped of it and tossed into a jungle, how many of us would survive a month?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  20. Clinical addiction or Gorwing soft. by Irvu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we are talking cliniacal definitions of addiction, i.e. falsely convinced that we cannot live without something and willing to orob/maim/kill/destroy our lives, to obtain it then it depends. I think ther we need to specify the technology in question.

    If we are talking a general "growing too soft/dependent upon specific tech" then I would say yes, especially with the internet. I know far too many people who feel the need to have a machine up all the time.

    But I think we should really go more basic than that; Electricity.

    The standards that we are used to in America, and the rest of the industrialized world (stable, widely available power that rarely if ever goes down) is a) uncommon in the rest of the world, and b) an anomoly in human existence. Few of my peers know how to make a fire or even what to do when the power goes down (hint, the electric can opener will no longer work).

    The level of panic surrounding the Y2k bug should have made this clear to anyone. Far too many people (some of them policymakers) panicked at the thought of "global power outages" and, as Katrina showed, far too many were left stranded, unprepared, and unaided when a real disaster struck.

    In my opinion "addiction" to mp3 players is just icing on the cake.

      in general)I know too many others who *have no clue*

    1. Re:Clinical addiction or Gorwing soft. by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      The level of panic surrounding the Y2k bug should have made this clear to anyone. Far too many people (some of them policymakers) panicked at the thought of "global power outages" and, as Katrina showed, far too many were left stranded, unprepared, and unaided when a real disaster struck.

      Ok, I think the victims of hurricane Katrina were affected by more than just power outages... I don't think that any of the people in the storm were concerned about their being no power to charge their laptops, blackberrys, and using their electric can openers as much as they were with the massive amounts of water flooding into their houses. Wait, now that I think about it more, I don't think any of the Katrina victims that were actually still around during the storm had laptops, blackberrys and electric can openers.

    2. Re:Clinical addiction or Gorwing soft. by Irvu · · Score: 1

      By "stranded, unprepared, and unaided" I meant real problems not a lack of e-mail. My point being that the issue of "e-mail addiction" or "ipod addiction" is really trivial when you compare it to the real problems faced by those isolated by Katrina, and their own government.

      As to the Y2k, again it wasn't about e-mail. I was referencing the fact that, in the run up to 2000 people were stocking up on canned goods, etc *as if* the bug would cause a global crisis. In reality Y2k was nothing and people, in a sense, overprepared. Katrina was real and we as a nation tragically underprepared.

  21. Well..... by zeke2.0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We are the Borg... We will assimilate your technology into our own and pay you for it... Resistance is futile.

    1. Re:Well..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled 'Microsoft'

  22. Why just Americans? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

    Sort of silly, but why consider just Americans as being addicted to technology? What about people in Japan or Hong Kong (I know it's a City)? Net cafes in Seoul? Super Hi-NRG Euro Techno?

    I suppose America is the land of $150 monthly Cable TV bills-- that probably has alot to do with it?

    1. Re:Why just Americans? by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Because it sells better. An article claiming that in all developed countries people get addicted to technology is just too obvious a story title. But if its restrained to one country, people ask why, and buy the magazine. Only to realise that they've again been outsmarted by Capt. Obvious.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  23. Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Compared to the insanely cool, science-fiction advanced consumer tech, everything from cell phones to high-speed internet available in Europe, Japan and South Korea, the US is dowdy and backwards. Cingular ain't got squat on DoMoCo, and even a Mielle washer/dryer set is lightyears ahead of the stone-age clunkers Kenmore and Maytag inflict on the American household.

    When it comes to technology obsession, the High Street in London and the Akihabara in Tokyo are where it's at.

    SoupIsGood Food

    1. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Hmmm...that was true years ago, but now the most popular cell phones in Japan are the same ones being sold in the US, China, Europe, etc., all at the same time - right now the most popular Japanese cell phone is the Sony Ericsson model, although granted the previous entry of the line (the 800) isn't available in the US.

      I think it's more or less true with every technology. There's little reason not to release the product world-wide, as there's world-wide demand for tech gadgets. Sure some countries have some gadgets that are more popular than elsewhere - in the US, for instance, PDAs and PDA-phones are much more popular than in other countries. But overall it's a world market for international companies, not something that operates on a nation-by-nation basis.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Mielle washer/dryer set is lightyears ahead of the stone-age clunkers Kenmore and Maytag inflict on the American household
      Actually Mell is not that much better than a plain old Maytag and unlike the Maytag it breaks down frequently You can pay 3500.00 for a The Gaggenau wall oven ,but it wont work any better than a Kitchenaid that costs 700.00.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    3. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Compared to the insanely cool, science-fiction advanced consumer tech, everything from cell phones to high-speed internet available in Europe, Japan and South Korea, the US is dowdy and backwards. Cingular ain't got squat on DoMoCo, and even a Mielle washer/dryer set is lightyears ahead of the stone-age clunkers Kenmore and Maytag inflict on the American household.
      That's because the US is very fond of wasting ressources. It also wastes space with urban sprawl, huge houses that cost a fortune.

      In Europe, they've been forced to conserve ressources. People will expect stuff to last for 10+ years, and the stuff most of the time does.

      First time I had a good look at an european washing machine (when a friend asked me to fix it) I was totally flabberghasted. It was more than 15 years ago, yet I never had dreamed I could see a microprocessor-controlled washing machine (fortunately, the trouble was just a dirty position sensor). I was able to get to the trouble spot with only a screwdriver and I did not have to move the machine: all components were near the top or the front and were accessible by removing the front or top panel. Plus the machine could take a full load, yet it was only 40 centimeter wide: the tub is set on it's side, with an axis parallel to the front.

      Americans are on the "if it ain't broke, don't improve it" mode, and when it comes to shrinking ressources, they are always caught with their pants down. Witness how the US automotive industry is in a tailspin since gas prices soared. Just like 30 years ago.

    4. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by really? · · Score: 1

      I was totally with you untill the "gas prices soared" part. I am now paying US$ 1.91/US gallon for gas, and a bit more for diesel. How is that "soared" copared to the rest of the world - this summer paid just over an Euro a litre for diesel all over Europe.
      I am looking around me, curently in Portland Oregon, and I am surrounded by a mass of obscenely big cars/trucks/SUVs. (Mind you, I probably should not be pointing any fingers, as I am driving around in an old GD300.) :-|

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      the US [...] wastes space with urban sprawl, huge houses that cost a fortune.

      Exactly! They're so backward. Here in London we've advanced to tiny, shitty little one-bed flats that cost a fortune.

    6. Re: Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by consonant · · Score: 0

      Americans are on the "if it ain't broke, don't improve it" mode, and when it comes to shrinking ressources, they are always caught with their pants down.

      That reminds me of the story of how an organization with a muted red Tyrannosaurus Rex as its logo is busy upsetting the applecart of another much larger organization (which doesn't really have its own logo) headed by some guy whose name sounds like male goats and his man-at-arms who likes to throw chairs around...All because the latter organization decided they needn't work no longer improving stuff...

    7. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      the US [...] wastes space with urban sprawl, huge houses that cost a fortune. Exactly! They're so backward. Here in London we've advanced to tiny, shitty little one-bed flats that cost a fortune.
      Location! Location! Location!

      American choice urban locations are just as expensive as elsewhere in the world.

      The thing is, elsewhere in the world, there is no room for sprawl, for when you're far enough to sprawl, you hit the next city.

      But in reality, life in Europe does not costs a fortune in energy, and this is what matters in the end.

    8. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly are you saying that stateside you are all still using top loading tub style washing machines ! Is that really the case ?

      Not having been to the states for about 20 years I simply wasn't aware of that.Let me tell you it's madness. If nothing else mounting the drum on it's side saves lots of water because only a small amount in the bottom of the drum will come into contact with the whole load during a cycle.

      How the hell does that happen, the last time I saw a top loader in the UK was my grandads 40 year old twin tub and these were very quickly phased out in favour of the "automatic" horizontal style of machine (maybe they had a 5-10 year period in the UK) It didn't take us long to work out that the horizontal method was vastly superiour...how come nobody over there has figured that out yet ?

    9. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1
      That's because the US is very fond of wasting ressources. It also wastes space with urban sprawl, huge houses that cost a fortune.

      Maybe that's because we've got plenty of room to do it in. Most of the US is well....still pretty much empty. We've got plenty of room for "urban sprawl." Europe has a much higher population, in a smaller area. And Japan really has a much smaller area, and a fairly large population too. They have "urban sprawl" problems. We just have plenty of room to grow. What next, going to claim Canada has a problem with "urban sprawl"?

      As for huge houses that cost a fortune....maybe we can afford them.

    10. Re:Bah. We're a buncha luddites. by nmos · · Score: 1

      Actually Canada is a pretty good counter example. They have lots of empty space and yet their population is still very concentrated in/near major cities.

  24. Addicted to Technology? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

    Yes. Absolutely. I'm looking at this on my new 21" LCD (yea, buddy!) while I listen to my iPod. I am waiting for a call on my bluetooth-enabled cellphone. I am downloading Knoppix with my laptop. My PocketPC is chirping because my alarm clock is going off. My MythTV box is currently recording the latest offerings from Science Channel. Tomorrow night, I will be setting up my four-old son's new computer in his room (complete with wi-fi, of course).

    I could not imagine my life without said items. Seriously. I would think that means the answer, at least in my case, is yes.

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
  25. Addicted to Luxury More Likely by TheUncleD · · Score: 1

    We love luxuries. Listening to music wherever you are is a luxury. Being able to use a computer at your favorite cafe is a luxury (laptops). Being able to send pictures to your website from your cell phone MOBLOGGING is "perhaps" a stretch of a luxury, but remains a luxury. Perhaps we should use the term "Luxury 2.0" in jest, since these are the luxuries of the technological world.. Whose got some more!

  26. Expensive by cdgod · · Score: 1

    In Canada, 3Mb/s is $48 per month... cheaper if you go with a smaller provider !

    The US is sooo expensive.

    --
    This .Sig is left intentionally humourless.
    1. Re:Expensive by brentcastle · · Score: 1

      Its just too bad you have to live in Canada to get such a good price.

      --
      http://www.brentcastle.com
    2. Re:Expensive by jZnat · · Score: 1

      But the big Canadian telcos are all awful, just like BellSouth claims to be. Canada's in the same "fuck the rest of the world; North America will have slow internet!" boat as America is in. Plus, you guys have levies on storage media (an outright inane idea in the first place).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Canada, 3Mb/s is $48 per month... cheaper if you go with a smaller provider !

      $48 per month? That's like $3.34 US! How do you guys get internet so cheap up north?

    4. Re:Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, Cox gives me 5m/768k for $39.99/mo (achievable even, as tested at dslreports). That's much faster than yours, for less money. My mom has 768/128 DSL from SBC (the lowest speed offered, and all she needs) for the dirt cheap price of $14.95/mo. Tell me again how terrible it is?

    5. Re:Expensive by Nimloth · · Score: 1

      I'm in QC, Canada, and I pay 37.95$ CAD a month, for 5.1 mbps / 820 kbps... You're getting ripped off.

    6. Re:Expensive by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you're talking USD or CAD there, but it's not too far off. I paid 30 USD over summer, but that was a promotion for new customers. I think usually it's 40 or 45 USD.

      The $200 is probably for high speed internet + digital cable + HBO + land line + cell phone + TiVo subscription + who knows what else. (It still does seem high though; adding that up gives me about 150 maybe...)

  27. drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by stonebeat.org · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i have friend whose dad is a tech junkie. All kinds of gadgets high-speed, workstation laptops etc. One day his son (my friend) got fed with it all, and moed to middle of Mojave desert, where he get no electricity, and certainly no television signal. And he has to drive 5 miles just to get to the closest payfone.

    But his daughter, who has doesn't even know what a television is, is very wise for her age (i.e. 7 yrs). Here, I make a distinction between knowledge and wisdom. She may not have all the knowledge, but she is certainly wiser then other kids of her age or even some grown ups.

    Would you do something like this? Would you make such a daring move for you children's sake?

    1. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great until you need to call 911 about something with your child.

    2. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by kebes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you make such a daring move for you children's sake?

      You are purposefully implying, with this question, that it is a good thing (to prevent your child from using technology). Would I do something daring for the sake of my child? You bet. Do I think that removing them from technology represents a case where the child is better off? No.

      Your one data point notwithstanding, I believe that a person is more likely to be happy, healthy, and intelligent if they have access to the full depth and breadth of what the world has to offer (including such things as: travelling to other countries, modern healtcare, books of all types, the internet, learning different languages, etc.).

      Restricting a child's access to tools is silly. Smart kids will be smart no matter what. Giving them access to more of the world will make them more worldly.

    3. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But his daughter, who has doesn't even know what a television is, is very wise for her age (i.e. 7 yrs). Here, I make a distinction between knowledge and wisdom. She may not have all the knowledge, but she is certainly wiser then other kids of her age or even some grown ups.

      That may be, but if I need someone to build me a long span bridge I'm not hiring Socrates or even Leonardo Da Vinci to do it.

      Your friend's move is not helping his kid in any way. I don't see a majority of kids growing up in poor countries becoming world geniuses and inventing Google, Apple etc. The reason is because, sadly, they do not yet have exposure to technology and knowledge. Those who are wise seek, and love, knowledge. The two are intertwined. You can't have wisdom without knowledge. Were socrates alive today, no doubt he'd take advantage of technology and modern communications methods to absorb ideas and knowledge from the world over (just as he did back then). It's pompous, arrogant, and (most of all) foolish to hate other humans and believe you can derive all the wisdom of a three thousand years of philosophy yourself.

    4. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      So, in a world where every single job that pays more than minimum wage requires computer interaction, he's crippling her development of important skills?

      If I was the government, I'd take his child away from him.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Case in point: I would know a lot less about math if I didn't have MathWorld and Wikipedia as references. Also applicable in the Mojave Desert example is the local college library I have access to for a more in depth approach.

      Life is what you make of it. Always has been, always will be.

    6. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't see too many of the construction worker's using laptops while they jackhammer around a manhole.

      Lots of jobs out there hardly rely on computers to actually DO the job. While at some point a computer is used in designing or laying out a plan, it's hardly "every single job that pays more than minimum wage". I'd wager most of those construction workers make more than a lot of programmers, and they deserve their pay. Construction is a long and hard job especially being in extreme weather conditions, not to mention dangerous with all the "we know better than you" drivers out there driving off into construction sites because they can't keep their eyes on the road.

      Side story. I heard a tale about a road crew who was tearing up approaches of people's driveways to prepare them for a new concrete approach as they came down with the sidewalk. One of the apartment complex owners complained that they should asphalt most of her parking lot because the "new" stuff they were putting in was inconveniencing her making them use the secondary exit. So they tore up more of her parking lot to appease her, and she wanted more work done after that (for free of course). The foreman said no, she complained to his superiors they said the ball was in his court. He still said no, and that she would have to wait for them to come back to finish what they started due to extra work she demanded they do. And because of the stink she made, she had about a foot deep hole in one of her parking lot entrances. It was well blocked, coned, barreled, so anyone driving a reasonable speed and LOOKING would see it and know to avoid bypassing the barrier. Every single morning the crew came into work, they had to call a tow truck to get a car out of the hole because people had been using her apartments parking lot as a short cut around a light...and they'd come flying around the corner leave about 10 feet of tread marks trying to get stopped before the front or sometimes the entire car went down in the hole. And I'd say it happened enough that a few of them made more than minimum wage and their job required computer interaction, but it still didn't stop them from driving into a deep, well-marked hole daily. And if anyone would have been in the hole, they'd be hurt if not dead. If I were the government, I'd take their license for at least 5 years involving accidents in construction zones, 15 years if they hurt anyone doing it, and forever if they kill someone due to negligence (rubber-necking, driving too close to the barriers *semis can chuck a barrel a good 20 at head height if it hits one*)

    7. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A friend of mine does happen to work in construction, and I am a college senior majoring in CS. My friend, an electrician, makes approximately $27K per annum. The offers I've been recieving from various companies (Google, AOL) so far are averaging $49K per annum, plus a much better benefits package. I just checked the National Bureau of Labor Statistics, and while it may or may not be out of date, it shows the average annual salary of a computing proffesional at approximately double the average annual salary of a construction worker.

      The fact of the matter is that the majority of jobs paying over $30K per annum involve at least some computer and technology related skills. From secretarial positions, to shipping clerks, to doctors, lawyers, and business people, all require the use of technology to provide the ability to quickly and efficiently store, access, and modify data (from customer records to students grades), and to provide the ability to communicate effectively. The hypothetical construction worker discussed does quite probably own and use a cell phone for both personal and business purposes, and, at least in this area, every foreman has a company issued cell phone in case of job related emergencies.

      As for the ulimate of this thread, I personally can not see how moving to the Mojave makes a child better off. A young child's well-being derives more from the love and attention of the parents than any other factor, according to the child psychology literature, and the next most important factor is the attainment of socialization skills in groups of ones peers, according to most studies. In the later stages of childhood and adolescence, the opportunities for learning and social expression provided by the internet are unmatched in the history of the world. I would posit that not providing some access to modern technology is akin to those who, in the 19th century, left the cities and began living off the land, trying to recreate an idealized medieval society. Yes, modern technological society has its drawbacks, but as a whole, humanity prospers more from pursuing technology than it loses. We have more to gain by going forwards, than back, in my humble opinion.

    8. Re:drive 5 miles to use a pay phone???? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      What the hell does your side story have to do with anything? Go blog about it, susan.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  28. A necessity as well as an addiction by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On one hand, yes I'm addicted -- I can barely go a day without at least briefly connecting to the internet, and I don't even want to know how many hours I've logged playing my little gnome mage on World of Warcraft.

    However, for many of us, the dependence is more than just a regular old physical/psychological addiction. My marks at school, for example, depend on my being able to get on a computer and access the internet on a regular basis. Many assignments are made available solely through a class website or WebCT, and in two of my classes this past term, every single assignment had to be handed in via the Unix handin command (or the web-based Windows equivalent). Admittedly, I am a computer science student, but there aren't all that many courses in which computers or other forms of technology are completely absent -- even arts students are expected to write essays, and few professors will accept handwritten submissions these days.

    1. Re:A necessity as well as an addiction by plover · · Score: 1
      few professors will accept handwritten submissions these days.

      Child. I had an English professor REFUSE a paper because I had printed it on a "computer". She would not accept it until I retyped it on a proper typewriter. I think it was the first computer prepared English paper she'd ever encountered. And it's not like she was particularly old, she was simply a Luddite who didn't believe computers should have anything to do with true academic studies, that they should be reserved for the studies of math and science.

      Granted, a 9-pin teletype's font wasn't exactly sculpted for ease of reading, and the school's permanently faded ribbons mostly just gray-striped the greenbar pages. But I had used a new ribbon and plain white paper for the occasion, and I had carefully cut the tractor edges from the sides down to 8-1/2" x 11" just for her. I even used the newer teletype that supported lower case! Not good enough -- it was the "computer" at the root of her problem, not so much the media upon which my report was printed.

      I'm only half-surprised she didn't teach by candlelight, or from texts hand-copied on parchment scrolls. I almost wonder if she ever made the leap into the 20th century, but I realize that I really don't care if she did or didn't -- the day she rejected that paper I reset my opinion meter of her to "-10" and left it there for the rest of my painful time in her class.

      Yes, kids, that's what it was like to be cutting edge in the dark ages of 1979.

      --
      John
    2. Re:A necessity as well as an addiction by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Heh, I remember that. Only my high school was a little more liberal -- if it was printed double-strike, it'd be accepted. I hope you at least had true descenders :).

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  29. I love slow news days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US? Have you been to Japan?

  30. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm posting this from my mobile, listening to my iPod, while my laptop works on a torrent. 'nuff said.

  31. Yes. by Valar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm addicted to fire, electricity, housing, cooked food and sharpened metal tools.

    Or maybe sometimes technology improves your life so you use it.

    Addiction is when something makes your life worse, but you keep using it because you are irrationally drawn to it.

    1. Re:Yes. by dustman · · Score: 1

      Addiction is when something makes your life worse

      Then why do my family keep holding these "Porn interventions". I can't be addicted, because porn definitely makes my life much better!

  32. Who pays $200 a month? by thehickcoder · · Score: 1

    Who pays $200 a month for home internet service? I can think of high bills for those who live in remote areas, but satellite is at most $100 a month ($60, if you don't rent the equipment). I know, I checked into getting it before the phone company made DSL available where I live. Even the small business commerical service in my area is less than $100.

    1. Re:Who pays $200 a month? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Read the post again - $200 a month for tech gadgets, not $200 for internet service.

  33. How about Japan or Korea? by jZnat · · Score: 1

    Those crazy Japanese typically have at least 100 Mbps up/down connections for usually less than $30USD a month, while we suffer with 6M down/512k up (if you're very lucky that is) for prices at least double that of Japan's. This holds true for where I live (Chicago, near O'Hare even), so don't give that "Japan is highly dense" bullshit.

    And all those Korean kids playing Starcraft, some even dying as a result. So I'm going to say, "No, America does not have a technology addiction."

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  34. Are you worried about the americans? by acid06 · · Score: 0

    Just look at Japanese stuff like QRIO and Asimo.
    Hell, even the new reincarnations of the old Aibo are impressive.

    "Broadband addiction" (whatever that means) is nothing compared to this.

    Soon you'll probably have people stating that in Japan robots are getting addicted to humans beings which they see as some sort of organic gadgets. And I'm not just trying to be fun.

  35. More of a habit than addiction... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


    Honestly, I love the internet and computers in general. But I consider it more of a habbit or routine than an addiction. Every morning I check my email while I have some juice. Then I get to work and check it again. At lunch I read the news online and do some more emailing....etc.

    Yet, on days when I don't have my usual routine (like weekends) I often don't even touch a computer until sometime in the afternoon. And then it is just because I feel bad thinking someone might be waiting for a reply, or maybe checking the weather or a movie time. Generally though, weekends are technology (as in computers and gadgets) free for the most part. I see enough of them in my work week that I am ready to unplug from the routine on the weekend.

  36. $200 a month!!! by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Wow Internet is expensive down south. Up here in Canada its between $20 to $50 for DSL or cable including the modem rental. I read somewhere Canada was claiming the worlds cheapest Internet, was some brochure or something.

    That shows how governments need to nationalize the net, provide it to everyone for free. Then they can make do without forms for businesses, taxes etc.

    I'm not addicted to cell phones, pdas, mp3 players, TV. I dont have that list (company provided cell phone). I'm a little addicted to the automobile, but I suppose it only replaced the horse. I'm addicted to the Internet... and the computer. But thats just the demographics I fall under, being on slashdot and all.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:$200 a month!!! by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      That $200.00 a month is likely for the total tech consumption (i.e. Internet access plus all you spend on tech toys, gadgets and related services) for the month - not for internet access. Internet access is between $20.00 and $50.00 a month - just like up north.

    2. Re:$200 a month!!! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Its the same here.

      However I could get FIOS fiber as well which is 3-15megs a second from anywhere from twice as much to $100 a month on the fastest speed and no upload caps. Also my cell phone bill was outrageously high from an exgf calling me during a bad breakup that equaled $200. I am tempted to hand her the bill for christmas. But I can do that charge easily.

      Many spend hundreds a month on Itunes as well purchasing music.

      Dont even start with the loans for things like computers and powerbooks. Damn I want the new intel ones next year with a LUST!

    3. Re:$200 a month!!! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow Internet is expensive down south.

      Wow you didn't read the article.

      That bill includes telephone, internet, and TV feeds. In much of the US DSL is down to $14.95, and high speed cable or FIOS is running about $50 for a 15 mb/sec feed in some areas. My cable service just announced a 30 mbit/sec premium service, and has hinted at 50 mbit/sec.

    4. Re:$200 a month!!! by geekylinuxkid · · Score: 1

      My cable service just announced a 30 mbit/sec premium service, and has hinted at 50 mbit/sec.

      Fuck! I'm stuck with the Premium service of 5mb/s. :| I really need to move.

      /me kicks the military.
      /me submits 4187 to be moved to 'high speed area' (ft lewis)

    5. Re:$200 a month!!! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Premium service of 5mb/s

      That is pathetic. My base service is 10, going to 15 over the next few months as the cable company rolls out an upgrade. Those with the 30 service are reporting that they can't find any hosts that hit that speed - all the can find is some speed tests that verify their throughput, so I may just stick with the standard service.

    6. Re:$200 a month!!! by mnmn · · Score: 1

      "High speed internet seems to be the one most determined to be a 'necessity'. A third of the country is said to pay more than $200.00 a month for their addiction, where 4 out of 10 pay between $100.00 and $150.00 a month."

      This implies the Internet more than technology in general. Maybe the OP did intend 'technology'.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  37. Addicted to Taxes, too by renimar · · Score: 5, Funny

    By that reasoning, we must also be addicted to taxes, because I know I pay well more than $200/month in income, sales and other taxes. Who do I talk to about giving up taxes?

    --
    In other news, Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilties Act...
    1. Re:Addicted to Taxes, too by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      Hmm... Maybe you should become a CEO like Robert Nardelli et al.


      Like most Americans, rank-and-file employees of Home Depot Inc. must reach into their own pockets to pay taxes.

      But not Robert Nardelli, the home-improvement retailer's chief executive. Under his employment contract, Home Depot picks up a big chunk of his federal and state income taxes. Specifically, the company is obliged to reimburse its CEO for taxes due on a slew of perks, including a high-end luxury car, his family's travel on Home Depot jets and forgiveness of a $10 million loan. Last year, these payments amounted to at least $3.3 million, topping Mr. Nardelli's $2 million base salary.

      Amid soaring CEO compensation, a number of companies are paying extra sums to cover executives' personal tax bills. Many companies are paying taxes due on core elements of executive pay, such as stock grants, signing bonuses and severance packages. Others are reimbursing taxes on corporate perquisites, which are treated as income by the Internal Revenue Service. They run the gamut from personal travel aboard corporate jets to country-club memberships and shopping excursions....

      Some examples of tax gross-ups:

      Federated Department Stores Inc., which owns Macy's and Bloomingdale's, compensates executives for taxes due on big merchandise discounts they receive in company stores. The company said in a filing that the discounts and related tax gross-ups totaled about $300,000 for its top executives in 2004, including more than $100,000 for one vice chairman, Ronald Tysoe...

      In an effort to shield executives from any tax bite on their pay, gross-ups can quickly spiral into huge sums. When a company reimburses executives for their tax payments, that creates new taxable compensation. The company then has to cover taxes on that new amount, which creates yet more taxable pay, and so on. The spiral ends when the ever-decreasing amount of new income reaches zero, or close to it.

      The bottom line: Grossing up an executive for taxes on $1 million can easily cost an additional $700,000 to $900,000. In some circumstances, gross-up reimbursements can be more than double the covered pay.

      Tax gross-ups have proliferated for one major reason, many compensation experts say: They allow companies to quietly pay more to top managers at a time when executive compensation is increasingly controversial.

    2. Re:Addicted to Taxes, too by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      The Grim Reaper.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  38. Its a good thing by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

    Its not a bad addiction, in fact it is probably the best addiction one can have. Humans depend on its technology and tools to survive, more today than ever before. Having an entire nation obsessed with having the newest and latest is a great way to advance areas of technology more useful for survival; though many advances are purly extravagance they are often the building blocks for greater things, such as hobbiest rocketeer's leading to German rocket weapons to the American and Russia space programs to satellite comm to landing on the moon to (hopefully one day) spreading our selves among the stars (and ofcourse then increasing our survivability against world ending catastrophies like the genesis of highly intelligent creatures.)

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  39. Make up your mind by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    First America is too slow in adopting broadband, now we are addicted? Either these articles are just trolling or we made a really quick turnaround...

    But then again this is Wired News + /., so what do you expect?

    BTW, from TFA... "The bill for being thoroughly plugged in to entertainment and communications runs more than $200 a month for a third of the households in this country. Four in 10 spend between $100 and $150 a month, according to the poll of 1,006 adults taken Dec. 13-15."

    Is it really news now that people buy a lot of gadgets in December? Next thing you know you will see a breaking news article about how sales of fireworks go up in late June/early July or about how sales of candy goes up in late October...

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  40. No different than the... by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    Japaneses, Koreans, Germans, Englishs, Aussies, French, Polish, Finnish, Swedes, Norwegians, Dutch, Flatlanders, Spaniards, Porteguese, Italians and God knows how many other countries that have dipped into the Internet.

    Leave me along and let me go back to my Crackberry.

    Sheesh!

  41. Psychologically Your Exactly Right by Michael_Munks · · Score: 0

    Addiction is defined by use despite consequences. So are there consequences for our behavior? I suppose different opinions could exist.

  42. Addiction or need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technology isn't a neutral soma, its use reflects an underlying need for expression, that's the addiction. You don't see people spending a fortune on elaborate heating systems, which are just a utility. Control, pleasure and voyeurism are most likely the expressions strongest beneath the American psyche. It's human nature to extend and embrace all those aspects. Look at the biggest sellers, I'm guessing phones, cameras, sex related, guns... and what do the corporations and Hollywood push at us all the time?

  43. I guess.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    you could turn off the power to the house and unplug the car battery for one day to see how reliant you are to it. I wouldn't necessary be worried about addiction more so too much reliance on it.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  44. Whatever! by andy753421 · · Score: 1

    I haven't used the internet in years...

  45. 4 out of 10??!?! by Zen · · Score: 1

    Okay, new poll. Who here pays more than $75/month for their internet connection?
    Most of us have cable or DSL. Cable is probably averaging $55-60/month for residential customers, and DSL is probably about $10-15 cheaper on average (my guesses, but based on some knowledge). The highest end plans cost more obviously, and Slashdot probably has a much higher percentage of high-end plans than the normal population. I simply cannot believe that $100-$150 is around 40% of the US population. Maybe these people are still using dialup, and their ISP is out of their area code so they have to pay per minute long distance charges and they took that into account when computing the cost. My T1 to my house only cost just a bit over $200, and that's definitely not a common option for people. Now I have business class cable instead of the T1 and it only costs $150, so what services are these people getting that they pay this much? I really want to know, because maybe there's better/faster options out there that I just don't know about.

    1. Re:4 out of 10??!?! by Zen · · Score: 1

      nevermind. RTFA before jumping to conclusions.

    2. Re:4 out of 10??!?! by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      I pay about $80, between the $60 (including taxes) for Cable Internet, and the $20 I pay for unlimited GPRS on my mobile. I tend to access the GPRS through my Powerbook via Bluetooth -- phone browsers don't quite cut it yet.

      If someone has a version of FireFox in the works for Symbian Q (Sony-Ericsson P-series), I need to know about it. And that's not some sissy request; That means if I find out you're hiding a more convenient channel for internet access from me, I'll do what it takes to make sure it doesn't happen again. I *needz* my internets.

      Jasin Natael
      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
  46. Addicted? I think not. by the_macman · · Score: 1

    Didn't RTFA but I would doubt the statement that so many americans are addicted, but rather their lives are integrated with technology. It's become a way of life. I'm a 22 year old college student. Every single college student I know (and most adults) has a computer, mostly laptops. My internet connection is constant and AIM is always signed on. If I need to get a hold of one of my friends I send him an IM, then check his away message and then call him. I live in NYC and I order my groceries online and they are delivered to my house. I recieve and turn in my school assignments across the web. I have a media center to serve up content throughout my house which is on a network. I bought most of my christmas presents online, pay my bills online, and check my bank online. Anywhere I take my laptop with me I can almost always get some sort of wireless connection, which allows me to access any of my files from home. I have a GPS navigation system in my car to keep me from getting lost and help me in unfamiliar areas. The list goes on and on. But my point is I'm not the only one living my life around technology. I grew up with computers (technology) and it's just a way of life with me and many others. The way techonology has evolved has created a global network and made venues for delivering information instantly. I think everyone has grown accustomed to that instant delivery. I wouldn't call it an addiction but rather a way of life. I can't even imagine what the life for my children is gonna be like (no slashdot jokes!).

  47. Growing soft by winkydink · · Score: 1

    They have pills that will take care of that for you. See you doctor.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  48. Yeah right by eander315 · · Score: 1

    There is NO WAY I'm going to actually figure out my monthly budget for electronics. If it weren't for all the junk clipped to my belt, stuck in my ears, clamped to my head, installed in my car, wired into my walls, broadcasting into the air, and sewn into my clothes (not to mention the 500 pounds of normal computer gear on my desk), I could probably retire at 35.

  49. depends on the way you look at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess things depends on the way you look at it. What one might call addiction, another might call a way of life.

    Most people will obviously have severe cravings for electricity if put in a remote village (without electricity). Does it mean that we are addicted to electricity. I would say not.

    I would call a habit an addiction if it has harmful (side) effects (eg. playing quake for 3 full years screwed me in undergrad; I would call that an addiction).

  50. I for one welcome our Japanese overlords. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I am addicted to technology. Japan is my dealer, ever pushing more and more sophisticated high-end digital smack on me... I need faster internet... I'm hoping Verizon FIOS will be available soon, so I can download off my premium usenet feed at 15mbps...

    I'm not the only one around here, it turns out. On a lark, I went war-walking with my new Ceramic White PSP the other day (It's worth noting that the Japanese models have longer wifi range), and found that here in Downtown Middlebury, VT-- a place I wouldn't really expect this to be the case --all the ground I covered had complete wifi coverage... (Ninety percent of which was totally unsecured...) So even here you can access the internet from just about any spot downtown... Granted, it's not the middle of nowhere like say, Fargo, but for sure, this isn't exactly Tokyo.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  51. I'm not addicted to technology, just information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had a choice between all the things my computer can do except for access the internet, and a computer that could just access the internet, I'd choose the latter.

  52. finally, a white man in that minority by kopper187 · · Score: 1

    "A third of the country ..." and "... 4 out of 10 ..."

    That makes 7.33/10 spending more than $100 per month.

    Paying half of a $40 per month cable bill makes me in a small, lucky, majority.

  53. List by PacketScan · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one starting listing there toys.

  54. Technology, yes. Spell check, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise, "dependent" would have been spelled correctly in the opening text.

  55. Toothbrushes. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    That could probably be more accurately stated, "Only 1% of Americans admit to not using a toothbrush daily."

  56. Moderator Please! by name*censored* · · Score: 0, Troll

    Can someone mod this entire article as Flamebait? It _is_ slashdot, after all.

    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  57. Addicted Americans by JustAnotherBob · · Score: 1

    I would have to say food is by far Americas biggest addiction. This can be seen by the percentage of our population that is catagorized as obese. How much does the average American household(family of 4) spend on fast food monthly?

  58. Just Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How addicted are all tech-literate people around the world?

    Asia anyone? How 'bout those crazy folks in Europe?

    IMO we're all about the same. The gadget that drives what we want/need/accept as normal, we can't live without.

  59. Uh, you mean like we're addicted to cars? by gregor-e · · Score: 1

    Once something becomes an ingrained part of life, it stops being something we're considered "addicted" to. But ask anyone from a developing nation whether it seems odd that most everyone here owns at least one vehicle from the age of 16 onward and see if some of them don't describe our use of cars as an "addiction".

    1. Re:Uh, you mean like we're addicted to cars? by Myself · · Score: 1

      Heh. Glad I searched the thread before posting!

      Next thing you know, they'll say we're addicted to newfangled things like microwaves (nevermind that they're more efficient than stoves), pasteurized milk (reduces delivery costs by keeping longer), and imported vegetables available year-round (improves nutrition)!

      Yeah, that internet access, it's just a fad like the automobile. Nobody ever does anything useful with it, so clearly any dependence should be trivialized with the word "addiction".

  60. work related by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    At my job we can't do a damn thing without internet access..... so we keep some beer in the fridge for days when the net is just too damn slow to get any work done. If it was an all guy office we'd probably sit around drinking beers and playing some lan games... but as we have a few hot girls in the office it invariably turns into a flirt and bad joke day ;-p not that I'm complaining...

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  61. +5 Funny? by jZnat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should be +5 Informative. We all know that the Internet is for porn...

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    1. Re:+5 Funny? by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Ugh, that was a terrible animation. The WoW one is much better.

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5430343841 227974645&q=wow+internet+is+for+porn

    2. Re:+5 Funny? by Nemi · · Score: 1

      Wow, I feel dumber just having watched that. I almost forgot how to navigate away from the page before it was over, but managed to do it before my IQ was reduced to that of my cat.

  62. I'd answer but... by h4ckintosh · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have to answer my cell phonce, txt my friend and check my email first.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell
  63. Adapted not Addicted by Quirk · · Score: 1
    While some species show an ability to use makeshift "tools", we as a species are tool makers. We fashion artifacts equisitely suited to a purpose. Those who now speak of adapting well and quickly to new technology as addiction would likely speak of earlier Europeans as "addicted" to firearms.

    An addiction is a reliance that is detrimental to an individual's homeostatic health.

    The crap journalism that flashes hot terms to flaunt specious thinking to sell advertising space may be a better description of addiction than the wide, successful adoption of new technology by a large segment of the population.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  64. Your job in medieval times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered what I would do if all this technology were to suddenly disappear. So I ask myself, what would I be doing if I lived in the medieval times?

    Monk, cook, 'wizard'... ?

  65. Denial? No... by stavromueller · · Score: 0

    Not me...Addicted, no way! I'm not addicted, I just like it. No really, I'm fine. I'm not addicted. Shut up, I'm OK. I could quit at any time. Just watch! Any time. No really.

    --
    I kill harmless processes for sport
  66. Well it gets worse by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about that whole 'it costs $200 per month to pay for this addiction' crap.

    Just buying 1 laptop could account for an entire year. Is buying 1 laptop an addiction nowadays?

    Guys it is a slow newsday. This reporter needed his christmas bonus so he put in a small non-article with a nice headline that while at the same time being properly alarmist is also nice and safe not to ruin the giftmas feeling.

    It also got iPod in it wich is always good.

    Bleh.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  67. Definitely!!!! by MJanofsky · · Score: 1

    I can't walk in a place without hearing someone gab on their cell phone or I walk past and hear someone's iPod blaring. I can't go 3 hours w/out checking my email or I feel disconnected. Now only if I get that Wifi Laptop and Web-enabled cell phone for christmas...

    --
    Ethernet (n): Device Used to Catch the Etherbunny
  68. Adult conversation brought on by technology: by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1
    * h4x0r3ss has joined #hacks
    <h4x0r3ss> H3y, y4ll. Any1 got CD Key for XPPro?
    <w1zz3rd> Yeah, I got your k3y right <i>here</i>.
    * w1zz3rd does 1337 m3g4-7hrus7.
    <gn0me_junk1e> h4x0r3ss: ASL?
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o h4x0r3ss
    * w1zz3rd is gay. nm.
    * gn0me_junk1e bows down in worship.
    Just telling it like it is, more or less. Really, it's sad how a person capable of intelligent discourse in person can devolve into "im hot 4 u" online.
  69. what is wrong with it by Odocoileus · · Score: 1

    addiction? why are we forced to feel guilty if something occupies more than a certain percentage of our time or money (especially if it makes us happy), and why is television allowed to take up so much time?

    --
    ...
  70. You want to see how addicted the US is? by dan_the_heretic · · Score: 0

    Tell a person who uses a digital camera that they have to use a film camera for a month.
    Hah! You thought Mac zealots were bad.

    --
    I don't like big words..., does that make me anti-semantic?
  71. I beg to differ... by Servo · · Score: 1

    The reason people were "left stranded, unprepared, and unaided when a real disaster struck" when Katrina hit was because they were dependant on the government, not technology.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  72. And bats are addicted to sound waves. by Austaph · · Score: 1

    Smell the smoke c. 500,000 B.C.E. Though, one could argue that the body is a machine. It's the Americans, particularly, who would like to believe that they are independent and free of all ties to anything else in the universe - under mum's dress clung firmly to her leg. Step One: We admitted we were powerless.

  73. Amish people ? by burni · · Score: 1

    I bet they would not concur, but hey they are using computers too ;)

  74. What's wrong with spending money on gadgets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, they entertain people and may be used as devices to attract not-so-good-looking members of the opposite (or whatever you prefer) sex.

  75. addiction by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    i use the computer a lot because i use it for a lot of things (movies, music, info, work, etc). just because you use something frequently doesn't mean your addicted. otherwise, you could say i have a serious toilet paper addiction. i can't exactly imagine someone getting the shakes or some other withdrawal issues from not using a computer.

  76. It's ALL tech... by lordmatthias215 · · Score: 1

    What an odd thing to say, that humans are becoming increasingly dependant on technology. Even if we were to throw away everything electronic, we would still depend on technology to do anything. Everything a human has created to carry out a purpose is technology. The wheel? technology. Pencils? Technology. Even things such as baseballs and shirts are technology. the sharp pointy sticks our ancestors used to kill animals were technology as well. We humans don't have the corner on any market. Our eyes, ears, noses, and tounges are less sensitive than most animals. Our reflexes are pretty slow. Shoot, pound for pound, the common sugar ant has us whipped in weightlifting. Our only strengths are opposable thumbs and our intelligence. So throughout our entire existence we have found the need to put both to work to shape things in new and creative ways in order to carry out the same tasks other animals can do naturally. We couldn't bite our prey to death like the predatory cats, so we created pointy things to do it for us. As our needs have evolved, our technology evolved with it. And as technology evolved, it lessened our workload enough to develop culture. We then created technology to assist us in culture. That's why we have such "unproductive" things as mp3 players and video games. In a way we're addicted to technology of all kinds, just like lions are addicted to their teeth and elephants their trunks. They can't survive without them, and we cant survive without tech.

  77. Tivo by DeadPrez · · Score: 1

    Right now the Tivo I gave my mother is "broken" because the channel lineup data is missing or wrong (possibly the wrong cable data is being pushed out). We tried changing the dialup number a couple times and have it now set to the 800 number, all to no avail.

    But we have become so used to having Tivo record based on the Season Pass feature that it is difficult to go back to using the native remote and the cable box's software. My sister who is visiting for Christmas asked a similar question the Slashdot article poses: How dependant are you on Tivo? My half-joking answer, "As dependent as we are for everything else" which my sister immediately took for as cars and food. I didn't refute her.

  78. Good thing by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1, Funny

    Been refreshing all day to get the new Slashdot article you guys! This is my comment. Hi Mom!

    Ok now the race begins for the next article.
    F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5. F5.

    1. Re:Good thing by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      Modded off topic. F5. F5. Wondering if it's cuz: I'm not American, or F5. F5. because Slashdot addiction doesn't count as technology addiction.

      F5....

    2. Re:Good thing by sdedeo · · Score: 1

      Why do you keep turning up the volume?

      --
      Protect your liberties. Donate to the ACLU
  79. Evidence of addiction by shanen · · Score: 1

    Just before reading this article I was apologizing to my friend for taking so long at the store because they had this gadget there that I had to play with, though I didn't actually buy one. It was a flashlight and radio with no batteries, but just a crank you use to charge it up. I thought it was really cute, but obviously my addiction isn't too bad, since I didn't buy it. Or maybe that was because I couldn't hear any good radio stations there?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  80. isn't it obvious? by waspleg · · Score: 1

    it's not an addiction to a particular thing as it is to distraction in general

    i've read numerous studies on national happiness (i admit to being well on the periphery of my country's politics and viewpoints and values -- so i'm no where near happy) and the US has yet to rank in so much as the top 10.

    what's also amusing is while apparently consumption of Shiny Things(tm) is up so are prescpritions for the attention getting of both adults and children.

    no i didn't read the article.

  81. Not so fast... by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    In Canada, 3Mb/s is $48 per month... cheaper if you go with a smaller provider ! The US is sooo expensive.

    My fiber-optic Verizon FIOS service gives me 5 M/bps downstream and 2 M/bps upsteam for $34.95 US per month. I'm not sure of the current exchange rate for Canadian to US dollars (assuming you were quoting Canadian dollars) but I'm not sure you're getting a much better deal than I am (if at all).

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Not so fast... by Zerathdune · · Score: 1

      he's getting a much worse deal than you. $48 CAN is roughly $41 USD nowadays (yeah, I know.) he's a bit misinformed about US prices.

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
  82. Compared to who, the Japanese? by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Even their dogs are robotic!

  83. "Dependent upon the government" by Irvu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I so love that phrase because it suggests weakness of some sort. As if governments didn't exist to protect and help the people and anyone who thinks otherwize deserves a rude awakening.

    In the case of Katrina the very government agencies that we have formed, funded and trained to care for the sick, the elderly, the disposessed of our society, were placed in the hands of self-centered morons whose only interest was in settling the "shirtsleeves up or down" issue. People who could not leave because they were too sick and didn't own cars were being told to "take some cash and drive away". Even now no reliable plan exists to get them home and Karl Rove is directing the reconstruction efforts.

    We form governments to protect us as a whole, because individual humans, however many guns they have, are weak and likely to die. To suggest that people who looked to the government that they supported to help them were "weak" or overly dependent" is in my opinion incorrect. Rather wwe should say that the government failed the people. The government failed in its most essential function. What's worse it did so because people let it fail, perhaps even made it fail not because it should not have succeeded.

    1. Re:"Dependent upon the government" by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      The government failed in its most essential function.

      I would have to disagree there. The government's most essential function is the same for all governments the world over, and that have ever existed: to control violence within their realm of influence. This is the characteristic that makes government government.

      Everything else is stuff that people think that government should do. Now whether or not our government failed there is definitely an issue. Was there too more violence in New Orleans than our government should have permitted?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:"Dependent upon the government" by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Was there too more violence in New Orleans than our government should have permitted?

      Well, yes; a hurricane is a rather violent event.

      Of course, our government can't exactly prevent this sort of violence (any more than it can always prevent human violence). But it can do a lot to ameliorate the effect of such violent events. In fact, it had been doing this in the New Orleans area, in the form of the levees and other flood-control measures. However, it the past few years the government has defunded such protections. This wasn't done innocently; they had plenty of warnings from experts on the subject, including the Army Corps of Engineers. But they decided they had better uses for the money (such as funding violence against the citizens of another country).

      The fact that a government can't totally prevent all violence from all sources doesn't excuse it from failing so dramatically to do what it is capable of doing. This is, after all, one of the standard explanations of why we should pay our taxes without complaint.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:"Dependent upon the government" by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      You are exactly right!!

      Throughout the major cities public service announcements (paid for by the taxpayers) are proclaiming that the citizenry must not "depend" upon the government but should look to providing their very own "disaster" kits!!!!!

      But government officials are paid big bucks putting out these nonsensical PSAs, while other government officials - both career and elected - are paid big bucks to act in such emergencies. Obviously, the freeloaders are not the victims, but those corrupt, pansies telling the victims that they should not depend upon those highly-paid, obviously useless, government freeloaders who serve no purpose whatsoever.

    4. Re:"Dependent upon the government" by Busy · · Score: 1

      If I remember this correctly, the federal levee repair money was cut when big chunks of it went missing. The money that was accounted for wasn't even used for the levees, but went toward Mardi Gras statue restoration or something retarded like that. I think it was somewhere around 1% actually went toward the levees.

      Judging from first hand stories I've heard about corruption in New Orleans, I believe it.

      --
      Think of someone with average intelligence. Now think 1/2 the world is dumber than that guy.
  84. How addicted are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very

    As I type this into one of two laptops on my bed while watching a DVD with surround sound.

  85. How about... by Belial6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about electricity, indoor plumbing, toilets in general. Don't forgent anything to do with farming. Plows, harvesters, trucks to ship food. I would say that if all technology disappeard tomorrow, 99% of the population would die. So, yes we are addicted, as most of the world is.

    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about electricity, indoor plumbing, toilets in general. Don't forgent anything to do with farming. Plows, harvesters, trucks to ship food. I would say that if all technology disappeard tomorrow, 99% of the population would die. So, yes we are addicted, as most of the world is.

      indoor plumbing,
      It was left to the classical Greek and Roman civilizations to bring a degree of sanitation to the masses, or at least the upper middle classes. Excavations at Olynthus in northern Greece, destroyed by Philip of Macedon in 432 B.C., attest to tiled bathrooms and self-draining tubs.


      toilets in general
      The earliest identifiable flushing toilets have been found in the ruins of the palace of King Minos on the island of Crete, circa 1500 B.C. Rain water or water from cisterns traveled though conduits built into the wall to flush away the waste from a master bathroom presumably belonging to the monarch, as well as several other toilets located within palace walls.

      source

      Don't forget anything to do with farming. Plows, harvesters, trucks to ship food.

      hmm, you really think 99% of the population will die ?

      makes me wonder how your family got here today

    2. Re:How about... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      If, by "technology" you mean "anything man made", then approximately 100% of us would die, due to the fact that without tools, we're horrible at ripping open a rabbit to get at the tasty bits inside.

      The wonderful thing about technology though, is that it exists in your mind. If there were a nuclear war, enough of us know how to generate electricity well enough to get by. Most of us know enough about simple machines and mechanics to be able to do a good many things that noone knew was even possible a thousand years ago. The things we could make without the specialized knowledge of engineers or scientists would be more crude, but we'd get better.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  86. But did you think? by tktk · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Hey, maybe Technology is addicted to us!

    Sometimes I wake up in the morning and there are all these gadgets laying around me.

  87. I'm as addicted to the Internet like... by Ignius_Danby · · Score: 1

    I'm addicted to tall gorgeous busty blond women who happen to be supermodels. Someone help me please!!!

  88. No: Americans are addicted to communications by postbigbang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Case: email Case: IM Case: online gaming Case: forums Case: surfing Case: RSS Case: interactive purchasing Case: downloading entertainment Case: blogging Case: social infrastructure Go on. Run the sieve. Tell me what's not addictive. We're social and interactive creatures. Ask the question again. What knid of dumbass question is this? Yo: Cowboy Neal--> learn to ask a reasonable question.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  89. Technology is Natural! by Da3vid · · Score: 1

    Yeah, are bees addicted to honey? Are sheep addicted to wool? Are whales addicted to plankton? Are we addicted to oxygen? Humans no longer evolve significantly genetically, we protect our weak, our sickly still breed, and genetic mutations still get passed on. That is not necessarily a problem. The human form of evolution is through technology. We don't need thick fur to survive the cold, we have clothes. We don't need four legs to move great distances quickly, we have bicycles and cars. We don't need great eyes to see far, we have glasses and telescopes. Computers and other such things enable us to use our minds differently and sometimes more efficiently (this doesn't necessarily mean productively: ie computer games). Various elements of technology are ways of enhancing the human race. This isn't a problem, its media hype.
     
    -Da3vid-

  90. Of course! by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Of course we're addicted to technology - all of us. I'm pretty sure most people would find life without running water, telephones, electricity, central heating, cars and all that pretty cumbersome, for example, and those are all examples of technology.

    FWIW, we're not just addicted to technology, either; we're also addicted to food, water, air and sleep, to love, sex and physical contact (between loved ones, at least), to friendship, humour, entertainment, and lots of other things.

    All of that may seem pointless, of course, but the reason why I'm saying it is that addictions are not necessarily bad things.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  91. I'm not addicted. Never! by unics · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lets see...

    -I have synchronous internet service with cable and dial backup
    -I have a pbx
    -I have remote internet access
    -I always carry my laptop computer
    -I host my own email
    -I have all IP based phones
    -My lights in the house are electronically controlled

    What on earth are you talking about addicted. ;-)

  92. Cellphones by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

    I think the OP forgot the most obvious of them all: The cellphone.

    As a college guy who's parents wont pony up for one w/ the plan (or at all for that matter), I'm acutely aware of how every tom dick and harry (and Jane, Janet and Janice) have one.

    1. Re:Cellphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a college guy who's parents wont pony up for one w/ the plan (or at all for that matter), I'm acutely aware of how every tom dick and harry (and Jane, Janet and Janice) have one.

      And you could get your own for under $10/month. Maybe when you have had enough college to know the difference between "whos" and "who's", your parents will buy you one as a present.

    2. Re:Cellphones by renehollan · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I've intentionally avoided getting one for the longest time.

      But, my wife (and recently 12 year old daughter) have been bugging me for so long, that I finally caved:

      LG camera phones for them and a Moto 851 (with Bluetooth earbud package) for me for XMas. 1400 Family Shared Verizon (I get a great price via employer) minutes. Shhh! :-) (They don't read /.)

      --
      You could've hired me.
  93. Are Americans Addicted to Technology? by GeorgeFrancisco · · Score: 1

    You had me at Are.

  94. Compare us to Japan by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    We in America might be addicted to technology but it's nothing compared to Japan IMO.

    Japan has toilets with buttons that sprays water at a temperature adapted to your anal temperature and whatnot, loads of electronics that we won't see for at least months to come and so many cellphones that all look like hello kitty or another japanese known animal.

    Japan is by all means a really cool country with electronics more advanced than ours so really, are WE technology-addicted or are the people with electronic toilets?

    That is not to say that it's weird. I'd love to own one of those toilets. I'd take a shit every minute to mess around with the buttons.

  95. Addicted? by martinultima · · Score: 1

    Ultima Linux, high speed Internet, a 2005 Epson all-in-one printer, a $375 machine built from stuff ordered at TigerDirect.com, a Dell machine I got for $55 on eBay, my 1997 Micron XPE laptop, a 1998-ish Olympus digital camera, and a few other pieces of computing equipment. Just about everything else I own is mostly various other electronics stuff, a lot of it from the 80's and therefore older than me (my TV and VCR both fall into that category). Used to carry around a Palm m125 but after about 2 1/2 years it got a bit worn down, stuff I own tends to get abused.

    Damn, I could have sworn I had more than that, it really does look like next to nothing on paper.

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  96. I don't know if I'm addicted or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You tell me... all I can tell you is that I can't remember how many times I read slashdot today. :-)

  97. Moderator points useless! by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why oh why won't Slashdot let me mod down the whole idiotic article!

  98. Silly. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Would you do something like this? Would you make such a daring move [to the desert] for you children's sake?

    Give me a break. Why not just fill the closet with sand and lock the kid up? Call it closet schooling.

    You don't have to live in the desert to live wisely. You can turn off your gadgets if they don't do anything useful for you.

    Most people like their cell phone because they can pick it up and call anyone in their family anytime they want at little or no cost.

    Most people like their internet because they can use it to share information better than any previous communication method short of moving into the same house with all of your letters, photos, music, projects and everything for a good chat. I don't want to begin to remember how crappy to get all my news from TV and printed news papers.

    Leaving all of that because one or two people you know are silly about gadgets is counter productive and self defeating.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  99. not convincing by xavi62028 · · Score: 1

    It is only an addiction if it causes harm to other aspects of your life. Sine i cna find no chemicals that affect your brain coming from cell phones, the choice to use technology must be voluntary and made with a sound mind. People then are able to reason that they value tech more than the money, and so it shouldn't matter how much they spend, even if you wouldn't spend that much. Everyone likes different things. The whole debate about productivity is pointless. I say tech is more productive becuase it satisfies our wants, better than anything else, otherwise we would be buying those things

  100. Electricity etc. by sjames · · Score: 1

    I really like technology (surprise :-), but it really amazes me the people who apparently can't get along without it at all. Not just prefer not to do without it, but as in real danger of freezing to death if the power is out for an extended time.

  101. Whoa great discovery! by alien3456 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Technology is actually useful!? Americans should be ashamed of themselves for taking advantage of such great convenience!

  102. Steps backwards by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Some things are getting harder.

    My vetenarian was complaining today that she used to have a system which used Ricochet, a dumb terminal in her truck, and a Xenix server in her office to access horse medical records remotely. This provided a 38Kb/s connection. Since Ricochet went out of business, that's no longer possible. Data over cellular is less available, slower, harder to set up, and more expensive. Yes, you can set up a VPN, and "web enable" the server, but it's more trouble than it is worth.

    1. Re:Steps backwards by jcnnghm · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Ricochet service was well ahead of its time. I was able to get about a 512 kilobit connection reliably in my house from the service a few years before I could get either DSL or cable modem service. Still couldn't get DSL or cable internet until well after Ricochet went under.

      The only problem with Ricochet is that I am almost certain I was the only person in my neighborhood that even new the service existed.

      A father once asked his son what he was going to do with a movie theater he had purchased. The son told him he was going to put new coverings on the seats. The father told the son the first thing he needs to put on the seats is assholes.

      Metricom wasn't putting enough assholes on the seats. They were also overdelivering for what they were advertising, which as I recall was 128 down or so.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Steps backwards by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      Move to europe. 500kb GPRS or EDGE available.

    3. Re:Steps backwards by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      A father once asked his son what he was going to do with a movie theater he had purchased. The son told him he was going to put new coverings on the seats. The father told the son the first thing he needs to put on the seats is assholes.

      I really like that analogy, and I will likely use it in the future; it's something that too many people don't seem to understand today -- that you need customers to run a business. I think most businesses fail because of that; too many people come up with 'great ideas' that nobody wants.

      Thank you very much.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  103. No, I'm not addicted... by GhaleonStrife · · Score: 0

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to play my DS, defrag 6 hard drives, burn 10 DVDs, sync my PDA, re-setup my surround sound system, and put a computer in the bathroom so I don't have to stop using the internet because of stupid bodily functions.

  104. Maybe, but by SebNukem · · Score: 2, Informative

    in fact, Americans are addicted to money.

    (It's no flamebait, just a fact - it's Ze capitalist country after all.)

    1. Re:Maybe, but by krysolid · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but more and more, less and less Americans hav money.
      So what is life going to be like in a country where the
      rich are floating high as a kite on the money they have more
      and more nedd of and need to "tax" the workers more and more
      to get. Already the taxpayers pay for the taxes, the
      fixes of things companies screw up, their research and development,
      subsidies for the rich, and the corporations tha screw up,
      ecological disasters, and what do they get ... compromised
      justice ... like any drug the people addicted to money need
      more and more and the see less and less what their quest
      for it does to them and others.

  105. An experiment by bob+whoops · · Score: 1

    This summer, I went to Mexico to visit some relatives for two weeks. I could have brought my laptop, but I decided not to, just to see what two weeks without my computer and an internet connection would be like. It turned out to be a fun two weeks, and I didn't miss my computer that much.

    The day I got back home, I arrived from the airport at around 1:00 AM and I was pretty tired because I hadn't been able to fall asleep on the plane. I preceeded to spend the next six hours catching up on everything that I had missed.

  106. Re:I'm not addicted to technology, just informatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    + 10 Fascinating.

    Dude.

    Ah the joys of the AC /. underground.

  107. Remember the Eloi by krysolid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone read "The Time Machine" and remember the Eloi, the surface dwelling
    flower children that used the technology that was left them, but after
    generations forgot how it worked. Do you happen to recall that they were
    food for the cannibalistic Morlocks? This is what happens with dependency.

    Think back though history and does anyone know when there was ever a group
    of people dependent on something, that another group did not find out about
    and take advantage of? Opium/China, Oil/USA, Grain/Russis, Cocaine/USA,
    Cheap Labor/USA, CheapGadgets/USA ...

    Lucky we have lots and lots of money in the back isn't it? Huh??????

  108. Puhlease!! by billmaly · · Score: 1

    Is this the same Wired AND Slashdot that will periodically bemoan the lack of broadband in rural America, that will cry and moan and complain about how S. Korea and other nations are outpacing the US in their depth of broadband usage. I call Shenanigans, and pot calling the kettle black on this one. Check the mirror /., then tell me that I'm the addict.

  109. I am addicted... by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

    ...to technology, in the same way that I am addicted to my throat and ears.

    1. Re:I am addicted... by krysolid · · Score: 1

      Better check in to a hospital on that one ... a throat and
      ear addiction is almost impossible to kick! ;-)

  110. Addiction? Only when there is a social impact by smchris · · Score: 1

    For example, self-checkout lanes.

    It seems particularly incongruous at the high-end "would you like to sample the brie with the Slovenian raspberry compote today, Sir" grocery we frequent that is just converting over to the d*mn things. Not only does it seem advantageous to help the poor folks keep their jobs at the till (not everybody's going to retrain to be a rocket scientist), what is the appeal of slogging your own stuff past the scanner when there is someone there to do it for you? Yet, self-service is very popular and they've phased in about 1/3 of the traffic in a month. I don't get the attraction of being your own checkout clerk.

    In retrospect, it seems like there was less excuse and more wisdom to the Afrikaaner woman who told me in the '80s, "Sure we could get a washing machine and a dryer and a power mower, etc. etc. -- but hiring a servant provides a job."

  111. Natural born cyborgs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not that we're addicted. We're natural augmenters. You might as well say that people are addicted to their pencils/pens, their cars, their oven, whatever. Create a technology that helps us do something we want (*NOT* need, it's all about want) to do better/faster/in a more interesting way, and we'll use it.

  112. It may be true... by azuredragon23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but the article makes it sounds as if it is a bad thing. Without tech, we would be reduced to killing each other for wealth, power, resources, women, etc. Now that we do have it... oh.. heh... la dee daa...

  113. TA - Technologists Anonymous by akeyes · · Score: 1

    Hello, My name is Andrew, and I'm addicted to Technology.

  114. Addicted? That's ridiculous! by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    I can quit anytime I want to, I just don't want to right now, that's all!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  115. Re:well by wocket44 · · Score: 1

    sadly, I must agree. Though getting a decent group can be a real pain.

  116. Forest people by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forest tribes are addicted to technology just like americans. They cannot live without bows, arrows, and fire tools.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  117. well in my case by bdigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am typing this comment from my toilet on my laptop... oh and I'm American

    1. Re:well in my case by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Rather than say, Japanese, who would do that as a matter of course and noone would even complain that they're addicted to the internet?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    2. Re:well in my case by bbdd · · Score: 1

      in japan, you would just dictate your comment to the voice recognition system built into the toilet, and it would log in and post it for you.

  118. Get real... by dextroz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You really forgot Japan this time! American's suck at technology in most cases. Half og you don't know how to program your VCR. The other half never knew anything about SMS either. The people who are really 'into' technology knowledge are the Finnish/Swedes/Dutch. The people who have successfully ingrained technology into their lifestyle are the Japanese.

    Get your head outta your ass, there is more to the world than the US and by no means are you the ideal standard.

    --
    Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  119. television makes you unwise? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I honestly never fell in with the "kill your television" crowd.

    You know what helps kids develop? Attention. Help kids find an interested in investigating the world around them.

    But you don't have to kill your TV (or anything else) to do it. Just find the right time for them. If it takes killing the TV, then do it, but honestly it just seems like the only reason to have to do so is as a replacement for self-control. And electricity doesn't cancel out attention either.

    As to his daughter being wise, I'm sorry, it's impossible to actually be wise at 7. Heck, I might even agree if you said it was impossible to be wise at age 18 (thus bolstering your argument that she could be as wise as some "adults"). Note that kids at that age just basically want to please their parents. And they're smart enough to know what their parents want. It's pretty easy to mistake doing what will make their parents happy for actual consideration of consequences.

    If I thought doing something would help my kids development, I'd strongly consider it. Of course the net effect has to be considered. If I'd lose my ability to earn money and thus support them, then no, I wouldn't do it. This might preclude moving to the Mojave Desert in my case.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  120. How stupid is this question? by Hosiah · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This question is so stupid that if you unscrewed your cranial cap, removed your brain, stuck it in a jar slopping-full of liquid LSD, marinaded it for a year, then baked it in a rotisserie at 450 for hours until it shriveled up to the size of a pea, then rectally inserted it until your tonsils tickled, you *still* would not be anywhere near the collasal stupidity required to generate such a question.

  121. Do you even have to ask that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't you seen the buzz around the Microsoft-Mozilla collaboration over the RSS icon? It's gonna revolutionize our lives!!! Yes, the americans are addicted, and rightly so!

  122. $200 a month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any crazy fool paying $200/month for internet access - must be a rich farmer with all the gov subsidies.

  123. Americans must be turned on by gadgets by trabisnikof · · Score: 1

    In soviet russia, gadgets are turned on by you!

    --
    Klatu Brata Nicto
  124. What about Finland and Norway? by yo5oy · · Score: 1

    I recall being able to buy food and cigarettes with a cell phone years ago, nearly six years ago actually. Definitely a much greater dependence upon technology when nearly 60% (hxxp://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_18/b3627033.h tm) of the population carries a cell phone back in 1999.

    --
    a slut did tulsa
  125. Are you kidding??? by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    ...How addicted are you?

    Well, I have a subscription to Slashdot and a under 200K number.

    This speaks volumes.

    Plus, if my DSL craps out. I don't know if I could handle going through a modem again.

  126. me? addicted?!?!?! by bmc152006 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i find it strange that i have absolutely nothing to do when my internet goes down....

    --
    "Times have not become more violent, they have just become more televised." - Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:me? addicted?!?!?! by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I'm visiting the inlaws, who don't even have a computer (though they ARE getting one for Christmas...), so I'm essentially broadband-less.. Not even any open access points in range of the house.. Grrr... So I'm reduced to taking the laptop to a PaneraBread for a wifi fix.... What was the question?? Yes! I AM ADDICTED!!!!

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:me? addicted?!?!?! by chawly · · Score: 1

      Suggest that you do as I do. Complain bitterly until they restore the service. It passes the time.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
    3. Re:me? addicted?!?!?! by bmc152006 · · Score: 1

      most of the time is my fault lol

      --
      "Times have not become more violent, they have just become more televised." - Marilyn Manson
    4. Re:me? addicted?!?!?! by chawly · · Score: 1

      Mais ... complain anyway, 'tis good for the soul - and it keeps them from falling asleep.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  127. Not a recent thing by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole world has been addicted to technology as soon as agriculture was invented and the human population exceeded the number that could be sustained by hunting and gathering alone.

    --
    ...but is it art?
  128. compared to the average japanese youth... by w4rl5ck · · Score: 1

    ... I think americans don't even know how to spell "nerd" correctly.

    It's called Otaku, anyway. ;)

  129. Mr. Dickens is insightful with his facts wrong?!? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Wonderful Charles Dickensian prose here, and just in time for a production of "A Christmas Carol". But hold on -- are things actually as he describes?

    Or did he forget some quite old technologies of yesteryear that invalidate everything he said?

    At the company where I work, we ship bridge segments. Our shipping/billing tickets are 5-copy carbon copy forms. Our database records *are* computerized on Microsoft Access, but that's just for one person because nobody can modify the system. The rest of us keep track using a pencil and paper spreadsheet, and it's no big deal.

    Our purchase orders are 3-copy carbon copy forms. (Whoops... for those of you not in the know, "carbon copy" refers to a paper that has a thick layer of carbon-heavy ink on the back. When you write on the top copy, carbon paper echos the writing down to lower levels.)

    Our information is stored on pegboards on the walls. We don't have hundreds of typists -- in fact, I'm the only typist. Before that, we simply wrote things by hand.

    Oh... and we're a Fortune 500 company.

    Yes, our drafting department does use computers nowadays. But I've been through drafting myself, and the computer doesn't save more than about 40% of the jobs. For a company like ours, that means that it causes a workforce reduction of about 1%. No big deal.

    Indeed, for every work hour saved by not needing a personal secretary, several hours of more expensive time are wasted by executives having to respond to emails, phone calls, and faxes every 3 minutes. Technology allows such inflated-importance immediacy, which is extremely damaging to productivity.

    I, for one, have to say that the technology has *not* greatly helped.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  130. Counter Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a recent trip to the UK, I managed to sit on a switch in my Palm for the entire 8 hour flight, totally draining it past the reserve. And of course my US spec CDMA phone doesn't work over there. So I was virtually without technology for 3 weeks. I had to revert to my other addiction. You know, the kind the Brits serve at slightly warmer temperatures, in not so frosty pint glasses, imported from Dublin.

    OK, I'll confess, the iPod and RoadTrip still worked, but that was strictly medicinal: to save my sanity from BBC 1-4. And the laptop is so passee that it doesn't really count as technology. Especially when the only high speed Internet is in the bar (see pints above).

  131. The military is addicted by floki · · Score: 2, Informative

    If one defines addiction as not being able to live without something then the military is definitely addicted to technology. A friend of mine during his military service took part in a joint training involving various of armies from NATO states. He always said the easiest thing to do was to secretly snitch the American's GPS devices. They were totally lost without them. Just his 2 cents.

    --
    from the to-stupid-for-words dept.
  132. Denial of the addiction by redzebra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is often considered as a typical sign of it.

    According to wikipedia , addiction is a compulsion to repeat a behavior regardless of its consequences.

    I know a bunch of people who are trully addicted to e-mail. They feel the need to check it during the whole day. They 'll use it as their sole way to communicate with other people. They 'll even send mails to the guy/girl sitting next to him/her rather than talk to them.

    And as a result they loose their ability to normaly communicate and socially interract with people. They'll feel lost and cut off from the world when they don't have access to their email. I would say this is typical compulsary behavior regardless of its consequences. However while many people start
    falling in that catagory, few are going to admit it.

    red.

    1. Re:Denial of the addiction by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      The problem with saying denial equals addiction is that it works other ways as well.
      If I ask you if you are addicted to drugs you will say no.
      I will too.
      Does that denial mean I am addicted?
      I don't take them so addiction is impossible.

      Now it is most likely a problem as you described but the emailing to the next person could be in fact because they can't talk normally.

      Like Cyrano de Bergerac having someone else do it for him, though in the case email rather than a human.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  133. Can we have an email address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Jennifer Strother, a mother of two young children who lives in Smithfield, Virginia.'

    "I'm hungry for adult conversation."

    Can we have an email address?

  134. The ultimate in redundant questions? by gaieios · · Score: 1

    How addicted are we? How addicted are you? I cannot believe you just asked /. that question.

  135. Addicted to technology? by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

    What a luddite thought....technology addiction. Mankind has been a technological species since it's beginnings. It's one of our key evolutionary advantages. The ability to make, use, and most importantly...improve tools. We cannot be addicted to something which we, by definition, have always depended on. Are we addicted to air, water, and food now (yes, I know there are incredibly stupid people who will claim that there is an addiction to food...ignore the morons)?

  136. I'm not too bad by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

    Every year since 2000, I have broken my addiction cycle somewhat during the summer, 2004-2005 have been the worst. I go up to a campground every summer and spend the summer. In 2004 a management change forced us to change plans and 2005 I had more gadgets (and time to play video games). The reason I say broken somewhat, is I change from computers and Internet to Video games. This year was the worst. I had my personal laptop, I did not use it everyday (don't ask me to do the same with my desktop at home). I also had my MP3 and digital camera, but I did not use these too frequently. I did however put some decent hours into my friend's PS2, but I was spending time with him, but he put decent hours on his iPod too. I am a techo geek, I can't totally stop using high-tech stuff, but I can shift to what my environment allows. Here is an example of the two environments I have. Home: -Full AC Power -Full Phone service (landline and cellular) -Internet (DSL as of November 2005) -Full power Desktop PC (crap to most of you, I will won't list specs as it will be off topic) -Cable TV -Sewer Connected Toilet System Campground: -Limited AC Power (30 AMP 120VAC for everything 3.6 KW MAX) -Poor Phone Service (Pay Phone, POOR Digital Cell Service) -WAP on Cell Use/another computer with Cable -PIII laptop -OTA TV (analog) -Toilet with holding tank / Full service (shower included) public Restroom -(2005) Friend living in full time (except for time at dad's) -(1999-Present) NES, Sega Genesis -(1998-2001) Game Boy -(2001) Game Boy Color -(2002-Present) Game Boy Advance -(2003-Present) N64, NEC Turbo Grafix -(2004-Present) SNES

    --
    sudo mod me up
  137. addiction = morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have a friend in psychology (actually neuroscience), and he often emphasises that in diagnosis, the difference between "something you like" and "addiction" is "does it disrupt the person's ability to live their life?"

    ...which is to say that addiction is just those behaviors that we don't like, but which some people nevertheless feel compelled to do. In this sense, psychology as a discipline turns out to be an adjunct to the church and state, telling us in fancy words what we can and cannot do. Why don't we like X? Because it's an addiction. Why is X an addiction? Because we don't like it. Surely that's "science" coming full circle!

    If an addiction is so only because it disrupts a person's ability to live their life (whatever that is supposed to mean), then the problem disappears when a different kind of life is chosen. Perhaps there is a certain kind of life in which drinking every day is the proper thing to do. The question then becomes whether onlookers give a damn. If they don't, then it's not an addiction. Of course, psychologists, those bystanders to life, always take the time to give a damn, because they like to "help people", which is to say they like to impose upon people the expectations of normality which their profession --and maybe God and Country-- impart upon them.

    _khl

    1. Re:addiction = morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may consider it subjective if you like. However, in diagnosis (whether of a medical disease or a psychological one), we must all agree on a range of states that are "normal and healthy." In the case of biological effects, anything that leads to death (or pain, etc.) is considered a disease. In the case of psychological analysis, things that leads to uncontrolled unhapiness (or self-destructive behavior, etc.) are candidates for being considered a disease.

      It is not a moral stance. If someone is happy drinking every day, that's great. When their daily drinking is making them mentally unstable and they are doing self-destructive things, psychology classifies that as abnormal. Yes, we must make a (somewhat arbitrary) decision about what "normal, socially responsible people" are like. But we must also make a (essentially arbitrary) decision that "death and disease" are bad things to be avoided. Medicine is not taking the moral stance that "diseases are evil!" but just trying to help people avoid states they don't like (death and pain). Similarly, psychology is not taking a moral stance that "being depressed or otherwise abnormal is bad" but just trying to help people avoid states they don't like (depression, obsession, addiction, etc.).

      (Yes, I'm well aware that sometimes a person afflicted with a mental disease doesn't "want" to be cured, because they seemingly enjoy being in that state... and yes, society must make a moral choice about whether or not to force help upon that person. However, this doesn't mean that the labelling system of "normal" and "abnormal" that psychology uses is not scientific.)

  138. One Word: Everquest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should about say it all for me.

  139. About the US having big houses by Matarick · · Score: 1

    As for huge houses that cost a fortune....maybe we can afford them.
    No is it just our banks give out too much money since they expect to make a killing from intrest from mortgages?

    1. Re:About the US having big houses by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Only if they think you'll pay it back, and if you pay it back, you can afford it. Some people can't, and they wont get a loan the next time. Credit card debt is a whole other story.

    2. Re:About the US having big houses by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      Not only will they not get the loan next time...they'll lose the house this time, and it'll go to someone who can afford it. And so it all comes back to the idea that the people usually live in the houses they can afford to live in.

  140. Definitely Addicted by optisonic · · Score: 1

    I drive my car to and from work every day. I couldn't live without it here in Dallas where everything is spread out so far. Oh, and I use the telephone to conduct business.

    What kind of news is this? OMG, people are using more tools to perform daily functions. Oh noes!!!

    Farmers have been using plows forever, does it mean they are addicted to technology? If so, who cares?

  141. I would agree with that headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a HSI support center, we currently have over 60 people on hold waiting for us. Apparently these people have no friends or family to spend the holiday season with.

  142. a terrible article by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    from the article:

    Some people freely admit to being high-tech junkies.

    "The internet connection is my lifeline," said Jennifer Strother, a mother of two young children who lives in Smithfield, Virginia. "It's the connection to friends, e-mail -- especially for stay-at-home moms. I'm hungry for adult conversation and any news that isn't Dora the Explorer or Blue's Clues."


    How is this an admission to being a hi tech junkie? The very reason for her use of the internet is not tech, but communication. As with most of the article the authors attempt to classify us as "junkies" fails. He or she fails to see that for the most part, tech purchases are so that we may consume media such as TV or Music or communicate with others. This is not an hi tech additiction as the author would have us believe, because the technology itself is not the motivator for purchase.

  143. Military tech by typical · · Score: 1

    And if your friend had his maps stolen by an African tribesman, could he successfully navigate by the stars?

    It's all relative.

    That being said, the reason so damn much high tech crap goes to the military is because "national security" is a great word to get ahold of federal money to siphon off to companies (defense contractors, construction types, etc) in your state.

    Consider the F-22 Raptor. The F-22 has a unit cost of somewhere above $150 million. Now, I recognize that technology is great and all, but you have to wonder whether the F-22 could really maintain the 10:1 kill ratio against an F-16 or something that costs in the $15 million range. Yes, it's got doohickies and all that, but who are you planning to fight with this thing? Who do you need to out-technology? Tribesmen in Africa? Rebels in Iraq? Hell, at some point your simple crashes-due-to-accident becomes significant.

    I think that every time I read about recent US military operations (Iraq, Somalia), there are problems with the sheer number of incompatible communication networks (everyone wants to develop their own network -- lots of $$$).

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  144. Technology ? give me fire by koona · · Score: 1

    Are "we" addicted to technology??? Duuh! Technology starting with perhaps fire constitutes a metaphorical ramp up which we have been grinding slowly, with much sweat and blood for eons. There really are no guardrails on this ramp, and at this point in time the elevation of the ramp above "a normal elevation for the species" is more than adequate to ensure a terminal velocity should one fall off the sucker. I as an expert in such things recommend an immediate crash course. Try just for 1 day, eating out of a dumpster... Not up to that? Well, sleep on the back porch, don't stint yourself, use that big fluffy acrylic comforter. Maybe better would be to just give the matter a little thought. This bird flu thing might just reward a few momments of reflection in spades

  145. Are we selling our children to pay for this? by tigerflag · · Score: 1

    "Are we selling our first-born children in order to satisfy our lust for new gadgets? Hardly. Is this fixation with technology making it difficult for us to live our lives? No. (In fact the technology sometimes makes our lives easier--hence it is a (partially) pragmatic desire.)"

    I think, to some extent we as a society ARE selling our children to pay for this expensive technology. To spend $100-$200 per month on cable TV, cell phones, broadband internet, etc. when most of us don't save enough (or at all) for retirement, is shortsighted and irresponsible. Who's going to take care of the baby-boomers when they retire? Tax dollars, paid for by our children, that's who.

    So many married couples feel they can't afford a stay-at-home parent to raise their small children, and our children are suffering for it. Maybe they could afford to stay at home if they were willing to do without a little more. Families hardly share a mealtime together anymore, and how many times is it just a meal thrown into a toxin-producing, nutrition-depleting microwave, interrupted by conversations on the cancer-causing cellphone, and watched in front of the brainless, cultural wasteland of TV?

    There's a lot of "keeping up with the Jones's" in our society, and most of what we're paying for just serves to make us that much more stressed and unavailable to ourselves and the people who really matter in our lives. How much happier are we now, really?

  146. I'm addicted to my pen by blueapples · · Score: 1
    I find that when I need to write something down, I just have to use my pen. I can't bring myself to use anything else for writing things down. I participated in a recent study on "writing utensil addiction". The results aren't out yet but I'll keep you posted.

    Seriously? How can you be addicted to a tool? Tools are created and become a part of how we operate. That's how we evolve people. It isn't addiction.

    Also, to be clear, "dependency" is not "addiction". An addiction only exists if the thing interferes with normal life and causes distress to the individual or those around her.

    --
    www.blueapples.org
  147. Dependant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess using a spellchecker is too much to ask though.

  148. Dude, this is the 21st century by samantha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only dweebs that think only in terms of "consumer electronics" and some model of sin if we aren't using manual typewriters would miss the fact that internet, cell phones, home computers, etc. help us do what we do a lot more productively and with a lot more information and convenience. The face of media is changing as increasingly all of us browse and share information and opinions. The entire face of business has changed. Large sections of how we socialize and with whom have changed to include a much larger circle. Are we "addicted" to more abundant and productive living? You bet! And as long as there is an ounce of gumption and worth in us we will continue to be. It is a good thing.

  149. Call me anti-addicted? by chivo243 · · Score: 1

    No cell/mobile no pda no tv/vcr/dvd no car 2 bicycles 2 laptops 2 servers 1 land line

    --
    Sig Hansen?