Slashdot Mirror


Prostitutes Call for a Ban on GTA

d writes "Gamespot has an article about an association of prostitutes protesting the GTA games. Apparently, the sex workers of the Sex Workers Outreach Project aren't too happy about their ingame counterparts being treated violently in the GTA games. They note that the games are a bad influence on children, and might encourage rape and violent behavior towards prostitutes in real life."

478 comments

  1. Prostitutes? by Dog+Chapman · · Score: 5, Funny


    Fuck them!

    --
    Born on a mountain, Raised in a cave!
    1. Re:Prostitutes? by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naww....you might catch something...

    2. Re:Prostitutes? by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "Prostitutes are already dead inside."

      Joke aside, not all prostitutes or prostitution environments are the same. GTA tends to portray the cliche streetwalker/drug addict/forced-into-by-pimp hookers. Brothels, escorts, call-girls, strippers, and porn actresses (including the amateur/web stuff) have different environments from this.

      I'm surprised nobody has made the argument that the violence against hookers (the streetwalking/drug addict/pimp kind) in GTA might actually educate youngsters that hooking (SW/DA/pimp kind) can be dangerous and undesirable, as opposed to "Pretty Woman" and similar portrayals which may cause more women to get into prostitution.

      Of course for that to happen it would have to be little girls that play GTA, which is the main demographic to play it, right? Guys? Hello? Why are you all looking at me funny?

    3. Re:Prostitutes? by madnuke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      everyone has aids! Aids aids aids! And I suppose Jack Thompson will be the chief pimp running the prosecutions against the evil liberal commie game maker Rockstar, Hookers have rights too!

    4. Re:Prostitutes? by Commander+Olav · · Score: 1, Troll

      FYI - I have been reading slashdot for a long time now, and this topic made me make an account. So here is my virginity comment.

      I like the comment "fuck them" ironic?

      I have played GTA and i have had sex with prostitutes "in the game" If you choose the slap, shoot, or drop kick the bi*ch its the players fault.

      Prostitution is illegal so why is there an organization for WTFFC Women that fu*k for Cash. I think the cops should be paying attention thos is ORG.

      P.s. Maybe people would be nicer to prostitutes if they were FREE

    5. Re:Prostitutes? by mjuarez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      P.S. Maybe people would be nicer to prostitutes if they were FREE

      That totally cracked me up. But seriously, people have got to lighten up. This is a GAME! Are SWAT unions protesting because they're the main target in CounterStrike? Is Germany demanding that the US stop selling Battlefield 2, because it depicts violence directed to German citizens? I would guess the answers would be "no", and "no".

      Not to say that these games will ruffle some feathers (I read recently about some indians threatening to sue a game company because of its 1800's shooter), but they're not supposed to be representations of real life. Anyone stupid enough, or sick enough, to believe that and later try to do it in real life, ought to be locked up anyway.

      Marcos

    6. Re:Prostitutes? by rrodkey · · Score: 1

      I'm Dolemite Bitch.

    7. Re:Prostitutes? by chris_eineke · · Score: 4, Informative
      Of course for that to happen it would have to be little girls that play GTA, which is the main demographic to play it, right?
      Believe or not, my 12-year-old sister enjoys GTA:SA. She drives around in cars and on motorcycles and when she is up for a challenge she clubs a hooker to death.

      Yes, I - too - think that's scary.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    8. Re:Prostitutes? by Cromac · · Score: 1
      Prostitution is illegal

      Not everywhere it isn't. It isn't even illegal everywhere in the US much less the entire world. Why should the cops spend ANY time investigating an org centered around a legal activity?

    9. Re:Prostitutes? by smvp6459 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would like to comment that there are "Pimp" missions in GTA: San Andreas where you come to the aid of your "ladies" and protect them from violent johns. Maybe this will teach our children that those who abuse prostitutes may themselves end up beaten/dead. Seems like a good counter balance to potential malfeasance. Plus some of the prostitutes carry knives and guns...another good lesson for our children.

    10. Re:Prostitutes? by Y0tsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

      These lame protests will be nothing compare to the fallout from my upcoming game: Imam Turkey Shoot.

    11. Re:Prostitutes? by vsprintf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      P.s. Maybe people would be nicer to prostitutes if they were FREE

      Talk to the (your) hand. Prostitution, by definition, is free as in libre but not as in beer - you pay for it. FREE (as in beer) sex may have more of a price tag than you want to pay once you've had it. Think about it.

    12. Re:Prostitutes? by alcmaeon · · Score: 1
      "P.s. Maybe people would be nicer to prostitutes if they were FREE"

      LOL, I love that line. Good point too.

      But, in reality, one way or the other, all men pay for sex. The difference with a prostitute, as opposed to a wife or girlfriend, for instance, is that you don't have to pretend to listen to the prostitute talk about her feelings. You can just walk way. He he.

    13. Re:Prostitutes? by sudorm · · Score: 1

      Battlefield 2 has German citizens in it?

    14. Re:Prostitutes? by binarybum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      right on. and let's not forget that GTA didn't start this - it can all be traced back to the ninja turtle arcade game where you have a chance to whack that whore on the skateboard.

      --
      ôó
    15. Re:Prostitutes? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should the cops spend ANY time investigating an org centered around a legal activity?

      They seem to spend plenty of time investigating the ACLU, so you tell me.

    16. Re:Prostitutes? by ShaneThePain · · Score: 1

      I think he meant battlefield 1942... battlefield 2 has no germans in it.

      --
      Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
    17. Re:Prostitutes? by sharkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Does it have a cartoon of Mohammed in it?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    18. Re:Prostitutes? by pembo13 · · Score: 0

      As much as prostitues argueably provide a service needed by society, I see no reason why focus shouldn't be given to the worse case scenarios. If a person finds themselves in that lifestyle, I would hope it is as a matter of need or personal choice (ie. what they always wanted to be) and not because they think it is a glamarous lifestyle. Some of this women, I am sure, are quite intelligent, and could probably be of more benifit to society doing other things. Disclaimer: I am against prostitution, but recognize how ancient its roots begin. I also again uncessary, real violence.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    19. Re:Prostitutes? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Joke aside, not all prostitutes or prostitution environments are the same.

      Just look in any big city's "alternative weeklies" (or even phone books) and you'll see dozens of escort agencies. From what I've heard, these deliveries arrive with downstairs drivers (and friends) that can "bring the pain" if a girl is dissed/not paid.

    20. Re:Prostitutes? by Commander+Olav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very true. but seriously I dont think prostitutes should be offended by that. I dont get mad at SNL's "Your Company's Computer Guy" That is actually funny.

    21. Re:Prostitutes? by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Funny



      you dont pay a prostitute for sex, you pay her to leave....

    22. Re:Prostitutes? by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Does it have a cartoon of Mohammed in it?

      They should make a fighting game where all the characters are religious figures. So you can be Jesus and beat the crap out of Mohammed, or vice versa. Other characters would include Satan, Buddha, Mary, an Orthodox rabbi, Vishnu, God, Santa, the Easter Bunny and Cthulhu. You wouldn't even have to make a profit off the game to get filthy rich- you'd just invest in defense contractors and then when screenshots of Mohammed and Satan tag-teaming the Easter Bunny and Buddha start circulating around the world, World War III starts and your defense stocks go through the roof.

    23. Re:Prostitutes? by bypedd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of the comments on this article are astoundingly immature and disrespectful. Prostitution may not be an acceptable job for most people, but that in no way makes them less human, and if anything it makes it important for them to form organizations to support other sex workers.

      Whether you condone the profession or not, that shouldn't affect their worth as a person who deserves respect.

      And I do think this is bunk - just like the idea that schools are less safe because of GTA, or that 13 year olds are more violent. But the fact that the general response to this has been "Prostitutes? Hah! They're sluts anyways, who cares what they think?" is more than a little disconcerting.

    24. Re:Prostitutes? by afxgrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's good to know that I'm not the only person who has thought about this idea ... aside from the making money from the conflict afterwards.

      Aside from that, what kind of finishing moves do you think Jesus would have?

    25. Re:Prostitutes? by marko123 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The Crucifix?"

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    26. Re:Prostitutes? by savorymedia · · Score: 1

      P.s. Maybe people would be nicer to prostitutes if they were FREE

      There are "free" prostitutes...they're called "sluts". ;)

      --
      1 is the square root of all evil.
    27. Re:Prostitutes? by Destoo · · Score: 1

      I can see the tag teams.. Mother Theresa (the Calcuta Fury) and Aldof Hitler (The Fuhrer) taking on the Double-Gees, Ghengis Khan and Ghandi, in a triple-caged match, fighting for the central european belt.

      Back on topic.. how long would Archangel Gabriel last vs. Cthulhu?
      And I think you also need to have the FSM in there. Noodly-appendage and all.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    28. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I think you also need to have the FSM in there. Noodly-appendage and all.
      We all (on /.) know that FSM is unbeatable and can kick the asses of all those deities with one noodly appendage each.

      Besides, depicting FSM in a violent game is blasphemy. What country are you from? I need to buy a flag to burn ;)
    29. Re:Prostitutes? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1
      They should make a fighting game where all the characters are religious figures.

      At least it would make all the religious nuts of all creeds violently attack one and the same company. Perhaps an idea for Microsoft?

    30. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not offensive enough - everybody you've mentionned is long dead. Plus, you're mixing dieties alongside prophets and god incarnates - that's gotta make for an unfair fight.

      I say you've got to limit yourself to humans, and pick live ones in addition to people drawn from our near and far histories. While religious icons and leaders can make for most of the cast, you should throw in a few political leaders who built cults of personality. Worship a dictator or worship a prophet, it's pretty similar.

      On the combat roster: Mohammed, Hitler, Jesus, Ratzinger, JP ][, Castro, Stalin, Kim, Mao, Pot, Smith, Robertson, Gates, Jobs and Bennifer. Depict all of these charismatic leaders in their prime age, give them special abilities, and you've got yourself a game!

    31. Re:Prostitutes? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      If you kill Him, he returns with super powers.

      I thought you Americans were familiar with the story in the Bible.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    32. Re:Prostitutes? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1



      Hitler (even though he had some pseudo-christian views) and Gengis Khan aren't widely considered to be religious figures.

      </pedantic>

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    33. Re:Prostitutes? by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hitler (even though he had some pseudo-christian views) and Gengis Khan aren't widely considered to be religious figures.

      Hitler represents the ultimate in human evil in popular culture (dunno if he really was, the competition is though for that position), just like the devil represents the ultimate in supernatural evil. As such Hitler definitely has religious significance. He's a kind of anti-saint, and has been nominated as a possible candidate for being the Beast of Revelation.

      Point is, Hitler's become legendary. In reality, of course, he was just an evil and likely insane human who gained power and not "evil given human form" or something like that, but the man has long since been eclipsed by the legend.

      Hitler was, for all intents and purposes, worshipped in Nazi Germany. Even now, long dead, he casts a shadow over modern-day Germany - and the whole word, really; it was largely the result of his actions that Europe lost the leadership of world to the US and that the state of Israel was born (which is one of the major reasons for conflicts between muslims and West). Moreover, the words "Hitler" and "Nazi" have the same echo as the words "Satan" and "demon", and the swastica evokes the same response as the pentagram.

      Based on this, I have to consider Hitler a religious figure. Hitler and the Nazis have long since ceased having their most importance as real historical figures, and become symbols of evil instead.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    34. Re:Prostitutes? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just ask yourself this: Did any female, ever, wake up in the morning and think 'Prostitution... that's a good idea'.

      Or did each and every single one of them end up in the situation where there was no other choice that they could think of.

      Every crack-head on a street corner was once someone's little girl in a party dress, and while they may've made bad choices it isn't OK for you to decide they don't count.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    35. Re:Prostitutes? by Xiaran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or did each and every single one of them end up in the situation where there was no other choice that they could think of.

      No. I know because I knew someone who worked as a part time hooker to put herself thru university. She had no problems with the idea of having sex for money... admittedly this was in Australia. Wehere is is completely legal. And she was working in a brothel that was run and owned by women. She said she didnt really have to have sex with someone she didnt really want to etc. She claimed it was a lot better than working in a shop... didnt eat nearly as much of her time... she got to study at work when there was nothing else to do. Im not marally condoning this lifestyle. But she was not a messed up drug addict. She just didnt mind and didnt think it was unethical. I respected her right to choose whatever she want to do with her body.

    36. Re:Prostitutes? by Andre_PC · · Score: 1

      Nah, Chtullu surely would be the last cheap-almost-unbeatable (or even secret?) boss of this game. Actually, would be great to fight him as a Colossus!

    37. Re:Prostitutes? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Sorry - should've said "Street prostitute".

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    38. Re:Prostitutes? by un1xl0ser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally I always razz on my co-workers that the next installment of GTA will be called "The Final Solution". If they really want to push the envelope, they'd do a warcrime/holocaust simulator, and just be done with it. If you fail, you have to hide out in south america.

      The defense is that "It's just a game, jeez."

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    39. Re:Prostitutes? by sofakingon · · Score: 1

      Aargh, don't forget the Flying Spaghetti Monster(tm)!

    40. Re:Prostitutes? by bhiestand · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Just ask yourself this: Did any female, ever, wake up in the morning and think 'Prostitution... that's a good idea'.

      Yes, yes they did. Now where the fuck have you been living? I personally know several prostitutes who are doing it to put themselves through college. They work nights, especially weekends, and have their days free for school. And yes, some of them actually like to fuck and enjoy their jobs.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    41. Re:Prostitutes? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      As I said to the other bloke - I meant street prostitutes as per those in GTA who hook on the street corners and take all the risks of violent assault. Given the discussion is about GTA I thought it was obvious I didn't mean ones who work in nice safe brothels.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    42. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does Battlefield 2 depict violence against German citizens? There are three forces in the game, the People's Liberation Army (Chinese), US Seals, and Middle Eastern Coalition.

      Even with the Special Forces expansion I don't believe there are any German forces in it. If I recall correctly there's British SAS, Rebels, Insurgents, and Russian Spetznaz.

    43. Re:Prostitutes? by Rydia · · Score: 1

      Gabriel was always the crappy Archangel. My money would be on Michael or Raphael.

    44. Re:Prostitutes? by MrDRwin · · Score: 0

      The end-boss should be the Flying Spaghetti Monster. He/She would just Hadouken you to death with meatballs.

    45. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael's Technically the only official Archangel, Gabriel was never stated to have that title, it's just assumed. Michael would be the one to use in a fight...he is the leader of the army of heaven.

    46. Re:Prostitutes? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Not every prostitute is a street walker. Many in the escort industry are college educated girls who do it because it rakes in money. A LOT of it. $300+ per hour. The "big names" even go on tour around the country.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    47. Re:Prostitutes? by tushar · · Score: 1
      World War III starts and your defense stocks go through the roof.
      Which would only be relevant if you are alive to encash it.
    48. Re:Prostitutes? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      True. Very good points there and well put.

      I suppose at one point, some figures in religious texts were just people who became religious symbols after they died. The cult of Elvis could be an example of this.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    49. Re:Prostitutes? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      God I wish we could edit our replies after posting. See my other replies.

      As I thought was obvious, I was referring to the kind of prostitutes the OP was clearly referring to. Like the ones in GTA.

      Sigh.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    50. Re:Prostitutes? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      There is a European extension due to be released one of these days although I don't think Euro troops will be shown with any specific nationality.

      So there will sort of be Germans (and assorted others) represented in Battlefield2 :)

      Still no prostitutes though. :-/

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    51. Re:Prostitutes? by Squirrelgirl · · Score: 1

      The swastika is one of the great losses.
      In the norse and in asia its considered a symbol of health, wellbeing and peace.

      The nazis flipped it (mirrored it) and used it as a symbol for themselves. There has been some outcries in asia by western tourists who see 1000 year old temples with swastikas (the correct way) and cry "nazi" (even though the nazis perverted an ancient good symbol).

      And I have heard that asians bemoan that us perverting the swastika is our problem and they shouldn't be forced to change their view on this symbol because of whatever foolishness we did. Which I agree with. The swastika in itself carries no special anti-zionist meaning that I know off, but was considered a nazi symbol in general. I'd like them to be able to turn it the correct way and be allowed to use it again.

      Another concept they ruined is the idea of heil. Heil is actually a very nice greeting, one of the best you can give someone. Now its useless. If someone says "Heil whoever" the real meaning of the word is not so likely to be considered.

    52. Re:Prostitutes? by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Well, in tag teams he can heal and respawn his partner.

    53. Re:Prostitutes? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      You've gotta love it. One moderator couldn't understand it and thought it was an attack on the GPL. :)

    54. Re:Prostitutes? by linj · · Score: 1

      Oh, dear.

      You forgot the Flying Spaghetti Monster and us Pastafarians...

  2. Justifying your vice. by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would think that this kind of reasoning would justify murderers to call for a ban on CBS (Crime Broadcasting Station).

    1. Re:Justifying your vice. by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1
      Weeeeell...

      That's assuming that you consider prostitution as serious a crime as murder. Hell, depending upon what country you're in prostitution may not even be a crime.

      --
      James P. Barrett
    2. Re:Justifying your vice. by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1
      Hell, depending upon what country you're in prostitution may not even be a crime.
      Or state...

      -If
      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    3. Re:Justifying your vice. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Well, the difference being that the prostitutes aren't claiming that the game caused them to be prostitutes, they claim that it's causing violence against prostitutes. Now if the murderers wanted to ban CBS because they think it causes them to get beaten up more often, you'd be on to something.....
      (emphasis on claim because I don't agree)

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  3. Here's to calling the kettle black by sexyrexy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sex workers definitely aren't a bad potential influence on children.

    Oh, wait.

    --

    Rex is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Concern · · Score: 1

      Why is sex in any way in the same league as violence, in the canon of what's "bad"?

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    2. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by interiot · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Umm, which is worse for kids, sex (consensual, mutually beneficial) or violence (beating/stabbing/shooting)? Okay, the sex is hinted at in the game, not real, though the real-world sex workers are real. And the violence is simulated, so it's not apples-to-apples.

      But still, if it comes down to consensual sex versus beating/killing people, I'd think that the sex would be less harmful to children.

    3. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Sex isn't bad, prostitution isn't neccesarily a crime

      puritans. /sigh

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    4. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by chrismcdirty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe in more civilized countries, but not in the USA. Here, we take pride in glamorizing violence as it contributes nothing at all to society, while degrading the reason that we are all here. After all, it's yucky. And nobody should ever think of it. EVER.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    5. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most sex workers are not a bad influence (in places where it's legal of course) on childred. They're simply people with jobs and tend not to involve children in their work any more than atomic bomb designers or lawyers do.


      Of course in places where it's illegal, I suppose it's a bad influence just like any other illegal activity - but again it seems they wouldn't likely involve children - at leasst not as much as speeding in an automobile does.

    6. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by luder · · Score: 2, Funny
      "we take pride in glamorizing violence "
      You mean sex, right?
    7. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is simulated sex and violence even in the same conversation as real sex and violence. Ok, sex maybe, but I'm going to assume the majority of people react much different to real acts of violence than to simulated ones.

    8. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      Yeah but in many countries, isn't prostitution a viable and realised option for many young girls? In countries where prostitution is illegal (I assume the countries where these girls are protesting from), their existence as lawbreakers does make seem their career seem more of a realistic alternative - regardless of age. I agree that law breakers should be the people to critize a perceived bad influence.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    9. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      I keep doing these major annoying typos: that should be, law breakers should be the last people to criticize a perceived bad influence.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    10. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Interesting

      sex (consensual, mutually beneficial) or violence (beating/stabbing/shooting)

      I'm guessing you've never heard of this sport called 'boxing' where two fully grown men attempt to beat the shit out of each other for money.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    11. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      there is a HUMONGOUS difference between sex and prostitution. quite frankly, women (and men) generally dont become prostitutes as the result of a life long dream they've had. I dont think there are kids who grow up saying "i wanna be a prostitute when i'm older!" The women are generally treated badly and abused and its not what I'd consider a "fun" job. People become prostitutes because they have nothing left and need money, a lot of you are taking a simple black and white view of how it works.

    12. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Maybe in more civilized countries, but not in the USA. Here, we take pride in glamorizing violence as it contributes nothing at all to society, while degrading the reason that we are all here."

      What bizarro-land do you live in? The majority of the US seems to glorify both of them. I can certainly walk through the mall and look at posters of all-but-naked women without someone trying to burn them or a guy in a blue butterfly suit jumping in front of me. And violence will be necessary as long as there is _anyone_ willing to use it to their own advantage. Tibet tried pacifism; look where it got them.

    13. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by chrismcdirty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But look at TV. You can see extreme acts of violence and gore (watch CSI, if only for gore), but most acts of sex are completely removed. Even on CSI, they always have the naughty parts on corpses covered. When I first watched the pilot for Firefly, I was amazed that they had a pseudo-sex-scene. Most likely because in the 23 years I've watched TV, I've never seen anything like that on a network station.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    14. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've always wanted to be a prostitute. This whole IT thing is just temporary.

    15. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      a lot of you are taking a simple black and white view of how it works.

      I thought that is how we were supposed to see the world? everything is supposed to be in black & white, were supposed to be color blind to everything why not take it here?

      also I want to know what kids they have been influincing...cause doesn't that counstitute child porn? are they admitting to encuraging child porn?

      and I might of missed something that they cought but can't you just pick up a prostitute, have sex with them, then they get out of the car and walk away and you can go on about your life? is there a part in the game I missed where they FORCE you to kill the hookers?

    16. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conditions are much much better for prostitutes in countries where prostitution is legal.

      Still, I doubt it's many peoples dream job however.

    17. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's because simulated sex is boring. People watch porn instead. Much better than the crap you'll get on tv and in movies.

      On the other hand, simulated violence is more exciting than the real thing, because we all know no one got hurt.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    18. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone grows up wanting to be a janitor either, should we outlaw janitors? There's plenty of janitors that get paid and treated badly. Maybe not as badly as prostitutes, but how much of their ill treatment is due to a society that bans what they do? They get forced into an underworld in which everyone gets treated poorly. Look at places where prostitution is legal, like the brothels in Nevada. These women get paid well for something they enjoy. I can't fathom what you see is wrong with that. Other than the risk of spreading disease, but that could just as easily be done by people who have sex with lots of people.

    19. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he meant violence. Because of its Puritan religious background, the U.S. is notorious for being excessively prudish about nudity and sex in general, while thinking nothing of portraying horrific, violent acts in the name of entertainment. This general statement is supported by our movie rating system. A movie that shows decapitations, mutilations, stabbings, shootings, or rape and/or torture will warrant a mere "R" rating - a minor under 17 must be accompanied by a guardian. However, a movie depicting two (or more) people having consensual sex and enjoying themselves, warrants an "X" - no minors allowed at all. *shrug* It's been that way for ages. Logically speaking, it's really fucked up that sex would be considered more obscene than murder. Something is just WRONG here....

    20. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by wolff000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      " Why is sex in any way in the same league as violence, in the canon of what's "bad"?"

      Because most all of the arguement are coming from the usa. The us is a place where they look at the naked human body as obscene and something that no one should show in public. Sex is looked at as evil mostly becuase the us was founded by a bunch of people that were afraid of thier own genitalia. they had tyrannical laws in the begginning stating exactly what kind of sex was legal and even when you could have it. many o these laws are still on the books and even prosecuted. so that's why.

      --
      WTF?
    21. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've been doing research into the game in question and my finding show that it at no part in the game forces you to kill hookers than it does force you to kill children or elderly people or anyone else for that matter (except gangsters, a lot of the time you have to kill them, which supports my hypothesis that the GTA line is inherently good in teaching kids that if you become a gangster, some badass man with a rocketlauncher and a lust to kill that would give Hitler a hard-on is probably going to come shit on you and your friends parade one day. But yea, you pay the hooker money, you drive to a place they find suitable (showing you have to respect hookers opinions) and you have sex, then you gain 125% health (but decrease your % sperm) and the hooker goes back to work, and you go back to killing off gangs singlehandedly and punching old women across the street while high on drugs then beating them to death with a bat for 45 minutes (my nephew seems like a nice 10 year old kid, all sports and smiles, visited him recently and watched in fasincation as he beat an old woman with a two foot long purple dildo he found in the communal showers at the police station for 45 minutes before going back to picking up hookers (always respectfully, and there to me is the perversion in our society).

    22. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      i'm not agreeing with banning the game; i'm against that. But in general a lot of you seem to have sophomoric views about prostitution as if it is only sex for money. Its not a simple black and white issue, sure you can look at it that way, but there are a lot of more factors. Its easy to try and see complex issues as simplistic, but they aren't. Do you think what drove people to become prostitutes in the first place? Do you think they enjoy having sex with every old man who picks them up just so they can pay the bills? Do you think they enjoy the abuse they go through from pimps who beat them and sometimes kill them when they don't make enough? Do you think they enjoy trying to survive in a society that screwed them over and probably resulted in them dropping out of school and walking the streets as soon as they turned 16? Its not a simple issue of "i give you sex, you give me money" and its, frankly, idiotic to look at it that way.

    23. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

      and I might of missed something that they cought but can't you just pick up a prostitute, have sex with them, then they get out of the car and walk away and you can go on about your life? is there a part in the game I missed where they FORCE you to kill the hookers?
      there's no part where they force you to kill the hookers, but if you want your money back then you do what you gotta do...get out of the car, wait for them to get out and use your baseball bat to "get your money back"

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    24. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Wrestling, where two men pretend to try to beat the crap of each other.

    25. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      thats a bad analogy because you can't compare janitorial work to being a child who at a young age is forced to sell herself because her mom is a crackhead and her dad is nonexistant. sure it's not always like that, but cmon, who do you honestly think the prostitutes in GTA were based on? Women who made some choice and work in nevada? or women who had nothing left? You can't deny the emotional impact of sex, especially at a young age with people you dont know, especially statuatory rape (because do you really think women wait till they're "legal age" to start prostitution?)

    26. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      "Bad" levels are debatable; however, in most of the US, prostitution still illegal.

      Which is why it's interesting to me that people would be speaking out like this. It would be like drug dealers complaining about the showing of COPS on TV because it promotes violence against them.

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    27. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      so my above post will have more backing: http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/usa.htm (scroll down a small bit and read from the heading titled "Prostitution:" to see exactly what I'm referring to) a lot of the girls are girls who ran away from home, just to abused more. You CANNOT in anyway look at this as a simple "sex for money" issue, there is a huge difference. By saying that you are saying that statuoratory rape, and child abuse and abuse in general is appropriate. You all keep saying "sex between two consenting adults"... who said they were adults? Great, i understand ok yeah whatever nice hypothetical philosphies and views. Now lets take a look at REALITY.

    28. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1
      "Umm, which is worse for kids"

      Umm, which part of Rated Mature... ie not for kids, is confusing everyone?

    29. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Concern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prostitution will always have a special place among crimes in the hearts of law enforcement personel and legislators, since many are customers.

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    30. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Man, TV in the US must suck more balls than I thought.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    31. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Concern · · Score: 1

      This is a bigger question than you might think. It breaks down the very notion of what money is, and what power is, and what gender roles are in our society.

      We used to have female slavery. Some cultures dressed it up with niceties like marriage.

      Prostitution was hugely liberating for women. They could now sell their services in a marketplace.

      Now we're finding new ways for women to fit in to the program. Hey, they can just be like men! Wow! And of course, effortless birth control, which makes much of the sexual calculus of earlier societies moot.

      Well, would it surprise you to know that many bright, beautiful middle class girls sell sex for money, under circumstances of luxury, respect and gentility that put many marriages to shame, in order to help finance graduate level education? That the stigma is not instinctive, and it is dissolving?

      There is no requirement for prostitution to be degrading or violent, any more than for hockey to have more fistfights than football.

      I imagine prostitution is just like marriage or casual relationships. Everyone approaches it differently; people will find highs and lows with all. The only difference is that prostitution in many of its forms still goes against the grain of our particular culture. It's evolution has been stunted by puritans...

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    32. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Man, TV in the US must suck more balls than I thought.
      I think you missed the point of the grandparent....
    33. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your statement looked extremely odd at first, and I couldn't figure out why. Then I realized that you correctly spelled "definitely". I can't remember the last time I saw that here. Thank you.

    34. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get elected to Congress.

    35. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      simulated violence is more exciting because it can be more over the top, huge farking explosions and 20 minutes of constant back and forth gunfire.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    36. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Indeed, most prostitutes- and a lot of sex workers in general- end up where they are not because it was what they dreamed about doing when they were young. However, you too are guilty of a black and white view of things. Not all prostitutes are dirty crack addicts, forced into a life of selling their own body to get the money to buy the next rock. Or whatever other stereotype of a streetwalker you want to use. Contrary to puritanical American "conventional wisdom," there are prostitutes and other sex workers who do indeed enjoy their job. Not surprisingly, this is usually in places where prostitution is legal, and there is a clean and regulated market, where people persue it as a matter of choice. Like legal sex workers, oftentimes it is a job they do for a relatively short period and make decent money (compared to the menial jobs other folks their age maybe engaged in).

      I'm not trying to say that places where prostitution is legal is some wonderland of joy, where women are worshipped as goddesses and treated like queens... but it is far from the streetwalking drug addict stereotype we're fed in the US. It is easy to just feel pity on anyone who "sells their body" but I've also talked to a lot of women, some of them who have been sex workers, who found it more appealing to "sell their body" in a legal, safe, clean and regulated system than to "sell their brain" like the rest of us.

      I even imagine there are little girls somewhere who might even want to do that when they grow up, but I do agree that it is rare. But then again, most jobs aren't the jobs kids sit and think "golly gee, that's what I want to do when I grow up!" A society of nothing but firemen, police officers, presidents, vetrinarians, astronauts, teachers, and professional athletes wouldn't be the most productive.

      Just some thoughts.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    37. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by RevAaron · · Score: 0

      law breakers should be the last people to criticize a perceived bad influence.

      Sorry, I call bullshit. You may subscribe to a Judeo-Christian outlook on life, believing that only he without sin should cast the first stone, but that doesn't go for all of us automatically. Why is it that people reject the morality of someone like a prostitute or drug addict, but has no problem accepting the moralizing of the alcohol-addicted pedophile that you usually call Pastor? Maybe you don't know he is an alcoholic pedophile; you nod along in church on Sunday to his insightful thoughts. If you knew the truth, would it make everything he said untrue?

      Contrary to popular belief, various forms of law breakers are people too. Being a drug addict or a streetwalker doesn't turn you into an inhuman monster, incapable of rational thought. Nor does it mean you no longer can have an opinion.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    38. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how are those AA meetings going RevAaron?

    39. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can work for Microsoft and be both.

    40. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and at I no point have I suggested this. Don't fucking accuse me of suscribing to any source of religious lifestyle - & I'm not for defence of legal daftness either. I'm saying that a professionals that make prostitution (statically an inherently violent illegal profession) a more conceivable to little girls should be taking a better look at the example they're setting. Even if I was religious (and Christian for that matter), I'd likely be pro-prostitution given the profession of a certain someone's mother. You just stereotype people who share a similar viewpoint into the types of people you already know (in this case, religious zealots).

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    41. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by really? · · Score: 1

      You are obviously not from AmeriKKKa. As some comic once said, in the US you can't show a boob on TV, unless it has a knife stuck in it.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    42. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by enjerth · · Score: 1

      Anyone else for sex and against violence on TV and in movies? This comment is for you.

      A drama without violence is called a soap opera, a chick flick, or pornography. Quite frankly, excepting pornography, these don't interest about 80% or more of males, who are likely the larger market when it comes to TV/movie entertainment. And voyeurism (with the camera) in TV/movies does little or nothing to progress the story. A drama does not need to show genitals or breasts. Dramas certainly don't need to show genital or nipple action. If you have a problem with that being rated unacceptable for younger viewers, you should probably go back to your porn and shut up. Because there's so much more to it than just your "sex is good" and "murder is bad" argument. You are being simple. Murder is more obscene than sex, but obscenities have nothing to do with the difference between the R and X ratings.

      Violence is completely different than sex and nudity. Yes, sex and nudity are beautiful. I understand all your arguments why sex is better than violence. Murder is worse than sex, hands down. But your arguments are not enough. A child witness to a crime that they know is wrong is not as likely to repeat that crime as compared to one who witnesses sexual acts is to repeat those acts. That's what makes graphic sex unacceptable for some audiences while violence is more acceptable. But logically speaking, neither is healthy for an immature mind.

      Our brains are quite sensitive to sexual images. We take in sexual images a lot differently than we take in violent images. Knowing that violence is (generally) wrong inhibits us from acting violently. But since consensual sex is welcomed (except for religious and social restrictions) and considered enjoyable to both parties involved, viewing sexual images promotes sexual activity in a way far beyond that which violent images promotes violence.

      We are weaker to sex than to violence. Precautions are made for those who are young, for those who are weak and even for those who find it undesirable or distasteful to witness sexual acts of other people. Not everyone is a voyeur.

      Yes. Violence is more obscene than nutidy or sex. But they affect us differently and, because of that, TV/movie viewing of them are regulated with different standards. That's not screwed up. Your argument is. We have a social standard that makes sex taboo for children. The only way that works is if it's reinforced with more social standards making it wrong to give children access to view sexual images.

      Of course, that standard is slowly changing... or the line between children and adults growing fuzzier. But there may be unforseen dangers in teaching and promoting sexual activity among young tenagers. We may be opening Pandora's box.

      P.S. Pandora's box is hot.
      [/rant]

    43. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by krayzkrok · · Score: 1

      You missed Farscape, then, featuring inter-species humanoid alien sex! (I hope that will sell a few more Farscape DVDs!)

    44. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      there is a HUMONGOUS difference between sex and prostitution.

      Not really, just the currency.

      quite frankly, women (and men) generally dont become prostitutes as the result of a life long dream they've had. I dont think there are kids who grow up saying "i wanna be a prostitute when i'm older!"

      There are lots of careers that could be said about. Garbage collectors, checkout operators, taxi drivers, etc.

      The women are generally treated badly and abused and its not what I'd consider a "fun" job. People become prostitutes because they have nothing left and need money, a lot of you are taking a simple black and white view of how it works.

      I know of at least two "working girls" who went to school with my girlfriend that are earning well over AU$100k/year, have been since they were ~17 (so nearly ten years), already own one house, are well on the way to owning a second, have completed a Uuniversity degree and are planning to "retire" at ~30 to pursue a more "mundane" career.

      Not every prostitute is doing what they do because they're a poor drug addict. Many are doing it because it can be easy, safe work with a high income and guaranteed employment.

    45. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by fuzz6y · · Score: 1

      I think I've heard this argument before. It starts with the assertion that violent misconduct is, on the whole, a lot worse than sexual misconduct. I won't dispute that, I agree completely. The obvious next leap is then to the conlcusion that depictions of violence are, on the whole, a lot worse than depictions of sex.
      And here I'll have to disagree.
      A child is going to have a much more developed frame of reference for dealing with ideas about violence than ideas about sex. The age when we begin indiscriminately trying to thwack people is much younger than the age at which we beging indiscriminately trying to fuck people. Also, nobody minds having a frank discussion with a curious child about violence, whereas talk about sex will make all the grownups turn red and start mumbling something about birds and bees.
      So when a little boy plays some counterstrike, the fictitious acts of violence are processed in the context of all the stuff he knows about violence. The inclination toward hurting people has been a fact of life for him since the first time he ever tried to share a toy. But if the same kid finds daddy's strip poker disc, there's much less context to help him process what he's watching. He might not even have ever experienced sexual desire. I personally had not reached puberty the first time I got my hands on some images of naked women, and I've heard enough "the time I found that Playboy" stories to believe that the same is true for most people.

      --
      If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
    46. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by violent.ed · · Score: 1

      PLease Mod Parent Up.

      That is exactly what all the house & senate ppl forget (ok not all, but maybe..)
      NOBODY GETS HURT for REAL in a videogame!
      I might have some violent tendencies... but i honestly dont think i would live them
      out...

      ok maybe one but i PROMISE you, its not because i played GTA ( 1 - 5? ) i had these ideas WAY before GTA, or even DUCK HUNT!@#$!@

      As a matter o fact, i seriously think that violent video games have SAVED lives!

      On some occasions when i was expieriencing homicidal tendencies (as a younger white suburban geek (the geek gets the girl) male), a good bout of street fighter, or mortal kombat, or Wolfenstein3D or Duke Nukem, OR DUCK HUNT!@$#! would bring a gentle calm upon me, expecially after kicking the #%@!%! out of M. Bison for the 500th time...

      So the next time a senator speakes uo because he dislikes/distates "Violence in videogames", REMEMEBER!!! He was one of those kids who couldnt figure out the whole up-down-up-down thing when he tried to play contra..

      --
      - You're not paranoid, they really are after you.
    47. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      People become prostitutes because they have nothing left and need money

      Maybe some people do, but I think many more turn to prostitution because their brain is baked either due to childhood sexual abuse and/or drug addiction. I would wager that virtually no non-drug using, non-abused adults turn to hooking, even when fiscally strapped.

      Not that I condone either action, but, personally, I'd steal before renting out my anus.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    48. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      there is a HUMONGOUS difference between sex and prostitution.

      Not really, just the currency.

      If you really believe this statement to be true either you've:
      1. Never had sex, period
      2. Never had sex with a prostitute
      3. Never had sex with a non-prostitute
      4. Have had sex with both prostitutes and non-prostitutes, but clearly the sex was meaningless with the non-prostitute, in which case I feel sorry for you
      Being /., the odds on favorite is #1, followed by #3. ;-)
      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    49. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I might have some violent tendencies...

      This is quite a surprise comming from someone named "violent ed".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    50. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Kuros_overkill · · Score: 1

      Yes... But Boxing and wrestling are usually Mutually-Consensual.
      I don't know about you, but personally, I have NEVER agreed to be stabbed.

    51. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
      That happens where prostitution is illegal, you dumbass.

      It being illegal, it has no child labor laws. Nor does it have worker's comp, or minimum wage.

      In addition, people employed in it cannot go to the legal system for crimes committed against them, like assault.

      Go find somewhere that prostitution is legal. There are no children employed in the legal industry, and almost no black market at all. It goes from something like 35%(1) of all hookers being underaged to, like, 1% or lower. (Basically, it replaces all the 'looks 20, is actually 14' girls with actual adults. The 1% pedophile market is still there. Although it's much, much harder to find, because if there's a black market, people just ask around. People do not walk into the door of legal brothels and ask where they keep 'The really young ones'.)

      Using the abuse of workers in an illegal market as a reason to keep said market illegal is possibly the fucking stupidest thing anyone has ever done. There are only two ways to stop children being exploited in the sex industry. One of them is the same way we keep children out of every other industry in existence, regulation, which requires legality. The other way would be to get rid of the sex industry, which would either involve a magical spell, or a specific surgerical operation on small boys before they hit puberty...

      1) Yes, it really is that high in some places. Oh, they look like adults, but looking like an adult female is not that hard for any female that is physically tall enough, with the right makeup, padding, and hair. Guys have a lot of clues that are hard to fake, but women not so much between, say, 14 and 18. (Or maybe the issue is really the age of puberty. Some guys who are 16 can often fake being 21.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    52. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      statically an inherently violent illegal profession

      That almost pure gibberish.

      So let's just break this down two words at a time:

      statistically+violent: Prostitutions are not statistically more violent than anyone else. They are subject to more violence, because they don't contact the police, but that doesn't make their profession a 'violent' profession, it makes it a dangerous one, like football player. A violent profession is one where you injure others, like a police officer or a chiropractor.

      statistically+illegal: Prostitution is possibly, statistically speaking, illegal, however, in many places it's basically treated the same as jaywalking, like India. I'd actually like to see evidence that over 50% of the world's population lives in the place that considers prostitution a crime, and then I'd like to see average punishments, before I'll consider it 'statistically illegal'. Each act might, statistically, be punished with a ten cent fine, once you include all the places it is not legal but never punished. That means, statistically, we think using up a gallon of gas is much much worse.

      inherently+violent: Well, possibly. Some types of sex do, indeed, require 'violence', so those jobs are inherently violent. But a tiny minority of hookers work those kinds of jobs, and it isn't 'real' violence, it's more akin to surgeons, who injure people, with their consent, so they feel better. Obviously not a good idea for some people, but the same thing applies to a lot of professions, like people who don't like organic slime shouldn't be garbage men, and people who aren't organic slime shouldn't be lawyers.

      inherently+illegal: That doesn't make sense, but even if there was some set of inherent rules humanity played by, like 'Don't take my stuff just because I'm not watching it.', prostitution is not against them. There's nothing inherently different between it and any other service performed for others, like cutting their hair or building their house.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    53. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But look at TV.

      Have you?

      You can see extreme acts of violence and gore (watch CSI, if only for gore), but most acts of sex are completely removed.

      A show about murder? Yeah, I would expect a bit of violence.

      But let's see, there's the swingers' party. The one with the woman and daughter screwing the same guy. The college kids killed by dry ice in the room next door.

      I know there're many more that involved sex as a key plot element, but these I know had actual sex scenes with actual naked people. Sure, you don't see any genitals, but what difference does that make?

      I dunno, I think you're crusading for a straw man.

    54. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      You may not know this, but pimps beat their women. It is part of the profession of prostitution. If you can't get the message, then fuck off and troll in some politics lobby on yahoo. Dickhead.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    55. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Ben+Varrey · · Score: 1

      Yep. You're totally right. Because sex workers frequently accost young children on the street in an effort to corrupt their innocence and lure them to a life of vice and debauchery. Stupid. Sex workers don't ply their trade to children---there's no money in it.

    56. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      you must have misunderstood me, my point was that the conditions are horrible, and you are looking it at it like they are good. Illegal or legal, i dont care. Whatever works. I was pointing out that as of now, in America, where it is illegal, the whole system is shit, and most people seem to not realize that. They seem to think its all a nice simple idea and dont pay attention to reality. If making it legal makes it better, than so be it, I never said anything about legality. I'm talking about how it is now.

    57. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      great thats SOME people. Now lets look at the 14 year old abused girls who end up on the streets trying to survive. Thats not propoganda, its true. How does this benefit the government? Propoganda would consist of "our streets are virtually free of children prostitutes" not "there are a lot of children who are prostitutes in out country"

    58. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Uh, no.

      Street pimps often do beat their women, but, as I pointed out, that makes the profession dangerous, not violent. Being a firefighter is not a violent profession, and neither is being a prostitute.

      Of course, the only reason that is true is 'slapping someone around a bit' is the only way to enforce contract law in the underworld. The pimp needs some enforcable means of collecting his cut, he can't go to the police or courts.

      Women who live in a brothel, OTOH, rarely get injured by the management, because the money goes to the brothel and then they get their cut, so can't be holding out. (Sadly, they are more likely to get injured by a client, because a prostitute who works out of her our house or a motel will call the police if assaulted by a client, or scream and cause others to call the police, whereas a client in a house of prostitution quite rightly assumes they will not want to call the police.)

      And call girls have the best of both worlds. They are away from other hookers, so none of them have any qualms about calling the police if assaulted, yet they have rates negotiated over the phone by their employer, so can't be holding out on money, even if they get handed the cash themselves.

      But, anyway, high risk of injury in a profession != violence in a profession. A soldier is in a violent profession, a medic in the military is just in a high-risk one.

      OTOH, being a pimp is an inherently violent profession, and it's not only towards the women. Pimps are expected to keep their territory free for their women, which requires driving off other women. The violence there is exactly the same as 'drug dealer', which they are in a sense: They must keep their product on the street, and remove everyone else's product, and threaten and eventually injury people who do not pay them money they are owed.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    59. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by ultranova · · Score: 1

      simulated violence is more exciting because it can be more over the top, huge farking explosions and 20 minutes of constant back and forth gunfire.

      It seems that you've never seen Chinese Kung-Fu Porn ?-) Loot it up, it's floating around in P2P networks somewhere... MLDonkey found it, at least, dunno what network it pulled it from.

      Just because porn makers lack imagination doesn't mean that porn is inherently unable to have nice special effects or a decent plot. It just means that the people producing it are incompetent as filmmakers.

      Heck, if I'd made SWE3, I'd included at least one scene of stormtroopers caughing one Jedi woman pleasing herself with ther lightsaber and failing to obey Order 66 from shock and a sudden rush of hormones... And of course a wise Jedi woman would want to keep them that way, especially since even a Jedi would need comfort when her universe crumbles around her ;)...

      And did Grievous always kill his captives right away ? He was a male once, and apparently one with many children, so he might want to... indulge... on his organic parts a little - and perhaps a smart Jedi might use that to keep herself alive until Kenobi killed Grievous, and then go underground when O66 came ?-)

      And - no, on second thought, that's too nasty for Slashdot, sorry ;).

      Hmm. I think I've just gained the motivation to learn Blender ;).

      Point is, that sex and sexuality is a very powerfull force in humans, and can be used to justify the characters acting completely irrationally. Since I mentioned Ep3, well, isn't the ultimate cause of Anakin going nuts that he thought that he wouldn't get any anymore ?-)

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    60. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      [sarcasm speach:'accent=southern'] You, sir,
      Are obviously not right in the head.
      It quite clear to anyone with half a brain that, while sex and violence are both base examples of our animal instincts, sexual activity is clearly more damaging to the youth of society. Should Johny, say, shoot and rob his next door neighbor, the neighbor will be dead and Johny in jail - thus society is safe.
      However, should Johny and Missy find a convienent haystack in which to frolic, why, there is no end to the damage which might be done to society. For should they take enjoyment of their illicit act, they may go forth and spread this vile thing called sex to all of the youth of the community.
      And thus it is clearly shown that sex is much more damaging to society. [/sarcasm]

    61. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by mfrank · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to imagine what my sex life would have been like if I'd insisted on dutch treat on every date . . .

      Yeah, I'd be a 43 year old virgin.

    62. Re:Here's to calling the kettle black by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      So in other words, you don't disagree with my comment.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  4. Life (as I learned it from GTA) by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting
    So I've got a star on me and I'm just waiting for the heat to melt off me so I pull up alongside this "sex worker." She hops in and I am in serious need after that last shoot out. Do I do anything violent to her? No, I go out to a remote area of the park and when the car starts rocking, I exchange cash for life. Not a bad deal, people exchange money for their health at hospitals everyday.

    So now we're done ... what to do? I kind of have two choices:
    A. Kill her and take my monies back.
    B. Keep her around in the car to do more money exchange.

    The way I see it, the game is encouraging me not to harm her because if I do, I'm going to get my monies back but I have to drive all the way back into town and I do not want the po-po on me right now.

    Btw, I learned all this like five years ago from this game. Where was this "sex workers group" when the game came out? They're a bit late to stop it from being released.

    I like how from TFA:
    Though the organization admits to being "adamantly opposed to any and all forms of censorship,"
    So let me get this straight ... mammary glands and naked women shouldn't be censored (sales are up for the sex workers!) but violence should be (worker lifespan is down)?
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...mammary glands and naked women shouldn't be censored but violence should be?

      That sounds like the difference between European and American censorship. If think we (the EU) have it right on this one. In my ideal world we're all exposed to sex, rather than violence :-)

    2. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or in San Andreas, you can complete the pimping mission and they pay YOU afterwards. So really, once you've pimped enough, you DON'T need to harm the prostitute at all. You get health AND money.

      So this teaches me that being a pimp increases your health and money. As a side-lesson, it also teaches me that all taxis will eventually be equipped with nitro...and that weapons laying around in front of a casino aren't a security concern at all.

      Oh, and there's this old post: A Day In The Life of a Balla

    3. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by weezkyd · · Score: 1

      So it's ok to censor violence in video games?

      IMO, censorship is wrong in all but the most extreme circumstances, and this definitely doesn't qualify.

      P.S. What is the E.U.'s position (if any) on censorship?

    4. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      P.S. What is the E.U.'s position (if any) on censorship?

      I don't know enough to answer your question, but I can tell you that the recent Muhammad comic controversy has brought about a case in EU court that will certainly have a hand in deciding it. Free speech VS Freedom of religion, or that is how the BBC world service spun it when I heard about it on the radio.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't approve of censorship, but if there is to be such, I'd prefer that it was non-consensual violence that was censored.

      Of course, since I don't approve of censorship, they won't ask my opinion.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by 4D6963 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "In my ideal world we're all exposed to sex, rather than violence :-)"

      If only it could be possible, more playmates on TV and less people who cut other peoples head with a saw

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the teen pregnancy rate is higher in the EU. Coincidence? I think not.

    8. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by alex_podam · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the teen pregnancy rate is higher in the EU. Coincidence? I think not.

      Bullshit

    9. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the E.U.'s position (if any) on censorship?

      There's a clause in the ECHR (the European equivalent of the Bill of Rights) saying we have freedom of expression, but it's followed by this paragraph:

      The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or the rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

      Maybe it's just me, but the exceptions listed can apply to pretty much anything (especially the "protection of health or morals" part). It's nothing like as far-reaching as the American version, that's for sure.

    10. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I don't know enough to answer your question, but I can tell you that the recent Muhammad comic controversy has brought about a case in EU court that will certainly have a hand in deciding it. Free speech VS Freedom of religion, or that is how the BBC world service spun it when I heard about it on the radio.

      Bullshit. The Muhammed comic didn't stop anyone from being a muslim. It didn't in any way hinder any muslim from going on and believing whatever they believe. Their freedom of religion was in no way endangered, none whatsover.

      No, the rioting muslims demand respect for their prophet, demand that Muhammed be above all criticism. But no, it's not even that; after all, the comic stated that Muhammed said to kill all nonmuslims, and there has not been any riots when Al-Qaida and other muslim terrorists have said the exact same thing.

      So I guess when all is said and done, it's Islam versus Western Democracy, round n+1. Freedom of Religion will only enter the picture and be threatened if Islam manages to win.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    11. Re:Life (as I learned it from GTA) by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I'm with you man. As far as I'm concerned, "Freedom of Religion" isn't legit unless it counts "Freedom from religion."

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  5. Heh by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah, let's all take advice on morality from hookers...

    --

    Long signatures suck.
    1. Re:Heh by Tweekster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and what is immoral? about selling sex for money? it seems like a rather honest exchange

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like a microcosm of marriage... /ducks

    3. Re:Heh by Xymor · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but then selling blood and organs should fit the same logic. It's your body and you should be able to do whatever.
      OTOH, if i'm not wrong, the state is supposed to protect you from yourself, by not letting these things happen.

    4. Re:Heh by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Nothing immoral about sex, nothing immoral about a free consentual business transaction

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    5. Re:Heh by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a lot of you are talking about it in a black and white view from your ivory towers. It doesnt matter where morality comes in, the simple fact remains that prostitution is NOT equatable to sex or nudity because prostitution is done when someone has nothing else they can do. It doesnt matter whether its immoral or not, thats a nonissue, the point is you cant think of it as just having sex for money because its not that simple, and that is a very juvenile and simplistic view to have.

    6. Re:Heh by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      How is buying the temporary use of a womans body akin to buying someones organs. Do you deprive the women of anything when you leave?

      Besides, as chef said, your not paying her to stay, your paying her to leave afterwards.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    7. Re:Heh by kalirion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the state protects you from those who would exploit you, not from yourself. There should be a way to protect people from exploitation while still allowing them to do whatever the fuck they want to to their bodies, as long as they're of sound mind and there's no coersion involved.

      And why is non-simulated porn allowed while prostitution isn't (in most states of the U.S. I mean)? It's all sex for money, right?

    8. Re:Heh by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      if i'm not wrong, the state is supposed to protect you from yourself

      Plenty of people (myself included) would argue that you are wrong, and that a legitimate state ought to protect people capable of rational decisions only from others, not from themselves.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    9. Re:Heh by Tweekster · · Score: 0

      why shouldnt you be able to? actually in some parts of the world, the legit market of selling organs has worked out quite well also, selling of body parts the arguement is easily made that it harms others and yourself. does the act of sex harm anyone? same with prostitution, when it is a legitimate profession, ie in some parts of nevada, regulation occurs and the business becomes much safer. STD tests, be able to track customers down etc. and no the government wasnt created to protect people from themselves... i dont know where you came up with that silly idea

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    10. Re:Heh by Bazzalisk · · Score: 3, Insightful
      people capable of rational decisions

      Are quite hard to find.

      --
      James P. Barrett
    11. Re:Heh by Kombat · · Score: 1


      Nothing immoral about sex, nothing immoral about a free consentual business transaction

      What about the morality of having sex with "Johns" when you know you have a communicable disease? Is it moral to demand double the agreed-upon price, after the transaction, under threat of blabbing to the guy's wife? Is it moral to take that money and spend it on drugs that you know were stolen from a pharmacy? Are the pimps "moral?"

      You make it sound like we're talking about educated, professional sex technicians or something. We're not. We're talking about uneducated, disease-plagued, drug-addicted teenagers who don't know how to shake the multiple monkeys on their backs.

      So I agree with the grandparent poster. Prostitutes are most definitely not beacons of morality.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    12. Re:Heh by slashdotnickname · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, let's all take advice on morality from hookers...

      I'd be more suspicious of people who base their morality on hocus-pocus religious mythology.

      There's nothing immoral about a consentual agreement between adults.

    13. Re:Heh by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      You're stereotyping != reality.

      Just because SOME are that (and most in america are BECAUSE OF IT BEING ILLEGAL) not ALL are and i'm talking on a global scale. So please remove the stereotyping BS.

      What about the morality of having sex with "Johns" when you know you have a communicable disease?

      Having sex with ANYONE for ANY REASON when you know you have a communicable disease (a STD) is completely immoral - unless you warn them in advance, and then it's just stupid.

      Prostitution is not synonymous with this situation

      Is it moral to demand double the agreed-upon price, after the transaction, under threat of blabbing to the guy's wife?

      No, that's extortion

      Prostitution is not synonymous with this situation

      Is it moral to take that money and spend it on drugs that you know were stolen from a pharmacy?

      No

      Prostitution is not synonymous with this situation

      Are the pimps "moral?"

      Depends on the definition of "pimps" - as we know them, No - they're petty gangsters

      Prostitution is not synonymous with this situation

      --------------------

      What do ALL of these situations involve? Prostitution is not synonymous with this situation. You added SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS - the prostitution isn't the immoral part of ANY of the situations above - it'st he SECONDARY CONSIDERATION YOU ADDED.

      Logic 100 pls.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    14. Re:Heh by Headcase88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More like dating. Except it's really more presents rather than money in exchange for sex. A timely article really *coughvalentinesdaycough*.

      And as for this story, it's is a real "me too" kind of charge, politicians, religious groups, etc are all over GTA so why don't we bitch about it too? There is no hooker rape in the game (you pay) and you can kill anyone in San Andreas. It would be giving them special treatment if you couldn't kill them...

      Okay actually Gamespot says there is one allusion to rape in the storyline, so fair is fair. Anyone that remembers this allusion and would care to say whether it glorified the rape?

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    15. Re:Heh by rainmayun · · Score: 1

      fine hairsplitting this, but porn stars are paid to compensate for the recording, not for the acts performed while recording.

      although I have a fair idea that if they get all set up and there is no performance, there won't be any paychecks either.

    16. Re:Heh by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      prostitution is done when someone has nothing else they can do. Sometimes that's true, certainly for many street-walkers. I think most escorts do it because it's an easy way to make a lot of money, though, not because there aren't other things they can do.

    17. Re:Heh by Stranger4U · · Score: 1

      Great George Carlin quote:
      "Selling is legal...fucking is legal...why isn't selling fucking legal?"

    18. Re:Heh by halivar · · Score: 1

      I'd be more suspicious of people who base their morality on hocus-pocus religious mythology.

      Heh. Let's say you have to let one or the other hold your ATM card for a week. Who are you going to pick?

      Yeah, thought so...

    19. Re:Heh by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's all take advice on morality from hookers

      Considering some of the hateful venom and fucking death prayers spewing from certain religious leaders on TV *cough*PatRoberson&friends*cough*, I'd say taking moral advice from hookers would be a blessed step up.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    20. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least he gets sex in return from the prostitute. Most supposedly 'god fearing' people I know would clean out his ATM account and not even give him a reacharound.

    21. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is true, and after all, aren't many relationships really the same thing, except instead of cash for sex, it's dinner and a movie for sex? In marriages where only one spouse works, isn't it security for sex? After all, the relationship would likely disolve pretty quickly if the sex stopped.

      Prostitution is simply a more direct and honest means of making that exchange, without the games, deceit, emotional entaglement, or manipulation.

    22. Re:Heh by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Fuck George Carlin. All he has is a bunch of lowbrow pseudo-intellectual douchebag shit that he tries to pass off as "enlightened" and "funny."

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    23. Re:Heh by Stranger4U · · Score: 1

      Remarkably like your post. *applauds* Congratulations on the wonderful demonstration of irony.

    24. Re:Heh by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      That's not irony, fool, at best it's hypocrisy. It's not that either, but hey, I'll give you something at least.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    25. Re:Heh by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Prostitutes are psychics that will know my PIN without me saying?

      I don't know if I'd be that keen on giving my card to a person that isn't fussed about what happens in the here and now because their messiah is returning soon ... they might go spend my money on ... hookers.

      Well, either way it looks like my money ends up at the same place. Might as well cut out the middle man.

    26. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's say you have to let one or the other hold your ATM card for a week. Who are you going to pick?

      When it comes to an ATM card - none of the above.

      When it comes to caring about the welfare of prostitutes, I'd trust the prostitutes (more than the religious nuts, anyway).

      You can trust some people for some things some of the time. People can generally be expected to care about their own welfare but neither prostitutes or religious nuts can be trusted to care about other people's welfare. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't but there are no guarantees.

    27. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an ethical theory that's backbone is that 'a couple people have agreed to do it' is basically allowing for anything.

      now i know you're not saying that, and i understand that the underlying rule here is that you're harming no one, so it's okay, but that's question begging to say the least.

      the main problem with subjective morals is that it can't deal with conflict. essentially you're saying that no one's moral is better than anyone else's moral (which makes sense if morals come from our imaginations). this, however, leaves you with a bit of a problem in dealing with people that infringe upon your 'bubble' of morals. when my moral says that your moral has to be removed (muslims fighting the infidel, christians arguing against lifestyles), you have conflict. and there will be conflict.

      so we treat some morals like they're objective just to interact with people in a sane manner.

    28. Re:Heh by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you are single, or unhappy in your relationship. And you probably wonder why.

    29. Re:Heh by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      "Okay actually Gamespot says there is one allusion to rape in the storyline, so fair is fair. Anyone that remembers this allusion and would care to say whether it glorified the rape?"

      This is what Gamespot says: "Though the player cannot actively rape prostitutes in the game, a possible rape is alluded to once during the storyline of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas."

      The writer either is lying or is deliberately twisting the facts. There are two allusions to rape in GTA:SA, both of which have to do with MEN being raped in prison. It has nothing to do with prostitutes.

      I have GTA III, Vice City and San Andreas and have played and replayed all three very frequently. The entire statement by this SWOP organization is one lie after another.

      This line in particular is 100% false:
      "Since the video game Grand Theft Auto accrues points to players for the depiction of the rape and murder of prostitutes..."

      Either they haven't run the game and don't realize that this statement is untrue, or they have run the game and know full well that their statement is untrue and they are intentionally libeling Take Two. Either way, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they hear from Take Two's lawyers.

      1) There is no rape, of anyone, except for mention of what goes on in prison.

      2) You do not get points for killing prostitutes. You don't get "points" for anything. You can kill any character in the game, including yourself. Prostitutes are not specific targets of anything and basically are just another type of pedestrian.

      3) You do not get points for raping prostitutes. You can't rape prostitutes in the first place, or anyone else for that matter.

    30. Re:Heh by Babbster · · Score: 1

      There are points in all the GTA games, they just go by the name "dollars" instead. They may have used the wrong term but at least as regards the killing of hookers - which does accrue dollars/points - it's only a difference of semantics. Now, on the issue of "rape," you're exactly right since you can't "force" the woman to get in the car and bounce it around with you.

    31. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing immoral about a consentual agreement between adults.

      There is if either participant neglects to mention their charming collection of sexually-transmitted diseases.

    32. Re:Heh by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      Money does not equal points. Points mean you're moving ahead in the game. Money is all but meaningless in GTA. You can be floating in it and it won't get you past the first mission.

      And whatever they meant by "points", they do NOT accrue when you kill a hooker. You don't get money, points, high-fives, concert tickets or ANYTHING special for killing hookers. If you get anything at all, it'll be sirens and cops with their guns drawn. If you're on a mission at the time, the cops will probably ruin your chances of beating it. That's hardly an encouragement.

      They might drop money and weapons if you kill them, but so does every other pedestrian in the game. There is no special reason or reward for killing hookers in GTA.

      These SWOP people picked a minor and irrelevant part of the game - the fact that hookers can be killed, like every other character in the game - and decided to declare that it is the only part of the game. Anyone reading their press release who hasn't played the games themselves would think the whole game was about Jack the Ripper, with the main goal of the character being to go around raping and killing whores.

      And then we arrive back at my original point. Either these people didn't run the game and decided to make public accusations without knowing what they were talking about or they know full well that they are lying and generating a little press for themselves. One is negligence, the other is defamation. They are liable in either case, so don't be surprised if the next chapter of this story is their receipt of a letter from Take Two's lawyers.

  6. Ban the parents then... by luder · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "They note that the games are a bad influence on children"
    And from the article:
    "SWOP is calling "on all parents and all gamers to boycott Grand Theft Auto.""
    GTA is rated Mature +17, how are children supposed to be able to play the game? Yell at the parents who let them play violent games...
    1. Re:Ban the parents then... by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is why I hate seeing videogames (and other media) in the news. Those who have no clue about the subject claim something is horrible and/or should be banned because of their flawed ideas about it.

      Regarding GTA specifically, have they looked at the game at all? It is a game named after a crime, in which you play a gangster. It carries prominent notices on all packaging (and all advertisements) that it is not for children. Any parents who allow their children to play this game are (in my opinion) guilty of negligence.

      Yes, there are corner cases, such as kids finding the game at their uncle's house while the adults are in another room, or kids who are close to being "adults" and whose parents know that their kids are well-adjusted, but this is not what I'm referring to.

    2. Re:Ban the parents then... by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      GTA is rated Mature +17, how are children supposed to be able to play the game? Yell at the parents who let them play violent games...

      But! but but.... we cannot POSSIBLY make parents take responsibility for choosing what they kids can and cannot watch - imagine if they have to listen to their kid whining about not being allowed to play GTA at age 11!

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    3. Re:Ban the parents then... by jotok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those who have no clue about the subject claim something is horrible and/or should be banned because of their flawed ideas about it.

      Isn't it a bunch of prostitutes doing the protests? Don't you think they would have some experience with exploitation and violence?

    4. Re:Ban the parents then... by Joebert · · Score: 0

      I don't think that'd work. Prostitutes would loose work.
      How do you think theese kids are able to play theese games ?
      Theese parents are out banging prostitutes, they must be, they sure as hell aren't keeping an eye on the kids...

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:Ban the parents then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yell at the parents who let them play violent games...

      It isn't even just parents looking the other way and allowing the kids to play the games. As a GameStop (the largest videogame retailer in the world, according to digitalmediareview.com) employee, I can attest that company policy on R-rated movies and Mature-rated games is that we refuse to sell them to anyone under 17. And when older teens or parents are purchasing them with younger children along, we read off the warning label to them: "Are you aware that this game is rated mature for violence, blood and gore, explicit sexual content, drug use, etc.?" Parents buy these things for their kids, and they do it knowing exactly what they're getting.

    6. Re:Ban the parents then... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Totally agree.

      However, this reeks of the same sort of hipocrisy as someone who calls the cops when their stash of weed is stolen.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    7. Re:Ban the parents then... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I was referring to VIDEO GAMES. Thanks for quoting me out of context, though.

  7. Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So we're getting calls to ban a form of entertainment... from the purveyors of a widely banned form of entertainment.

    Something about glass houses comes to mind here.

    1. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by rylin · · Score: 1

      Don't throw glasses in your house when you're stoned?

    2. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nevada is the only state that has legalized Prostitution and even then only in certain counties. GOOGLE

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been to Nevada, have you?

    4. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      You've never looked up the difference between the word "widely" and the word "entirely", have you?

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    5. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought too. I was beginning to wonder. So how can a group of people who engage in illegal activities, conciously, for a living, be "unionized" in any way, shape or form? My heart goes out to any of those individuals who meet real abuse in their lives, but as a group, I don't see their point.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    6. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by venicebeach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's always seemed strange to me is that prostitution is illegal unless you film it.

      In other words, I can pay a woman to have sex with me if she is an actor in my porn film. I just can't do it for my own private pleasure, I have to be making something for others to see. Bizarre.

    7. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Well, since you can get a webcam for like 20 bucks, that takes care of that!

      --
      This space available.
    8. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by bloosqr · · Score: 1

      I've actually wondered the same thing. It would be a simple way around anti-prostitution laws in any state i.e. people would pay money to make movies of themselves in a sex with an "actress." That would be fascinating court case to watch.

    9. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow.... this is a surprisingly good idea.

      "Make your own private sex film! Master copy of the tape handed to you after the shoot! Select from the following 50 women!"

      This is worth more thought. I'm going to investigate the legality of that. This would be an absolutely HUGE moneymaker for escort services; they could literally legitimize their operations overnight.

      At the same time, it is most likely a loophole that could be closed overnight. I wonder if there is some kind of state-by-state pornographer "licensing" scheme... Hm....

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    10. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      It would only work in cases where (a) people would *want* to be filmed. (Even if they're going to keep the only copy, that's still a huge psychological barrier), and (b) people were assured that there would be only one copy made (not "accidently" leaked online, or held as blackmail material).

    11. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by rograndom · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's always seemed strange to me is that prostitution is illegal unless you film it.

      In other words, I can pay a woman to have sex with me if she is an actor in my porn film. I just can't do it for my own private pleasure, I have to be making something for others to see. Bizarre.
      Ah, but you're not paying for sex. You're paying for her time as an actress. If she happens to want to have sex with you then that is in no way related to her pay for the day. If she doesn't want to have sex with you, well, she probably won't be getting much work anymore.

      This is the same reason why you see ads for "Escort Services" and not for "Hookers". You're buying time, not sex.

    12. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      It would be a simple way around anti-prostitution laws in any state i.e. people would pay money to make movies of themselves in a sex with an "actress." That would be fascinating court case to watch.

      Especially the evidence - better watch it one more time, just to make sure I didn't miss anything important ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:Wait, isn't prostitution illegal? by Spanky+Lovesalot · · Score: 1
      Actually, no, this is not automatically legal. For instance, in South Carolina, filming porn is illegal. Luther Campbell from 2 Live Crew was arrested a couple of years ago for it. It violates the laws regarding "OFFENSES AGAINST MORALITY AND DECENCY".

      Also known as the State Lewd and Indecent Acts Law.

  8. Why haven't police done the same? by merreborn · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's at least as much cop killing in GTA as there is ho slaughtering.

    1. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's much, much more. The Pimp missions require you to save your hos from rough customers! They should be praising this game not calling for it's boycott!

      --
      -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    2. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell, the cops mostly got their whining about the problem of people having freedom of expression out of the way in the 80s with "Gangsta Rap".

    3. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by biocute · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that's because cops in the game can fight back, and sometimes they win. If they don't win, they send out FBI, or even military to eventually kill the player.

      What can prostitutes in the game do besides maybe running away from the player? GTA should include prostitutes hitting the player violently with their handbags, or kicking the player in the nuts.

    4. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      GTA should include prostitutes hitting the player violently with their handbags, or kicking the player in the nuts.

      Or pulling a nine out of their purse and capping the player. What, you think prostitutes walk around without protection of their own? Are you naive?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      In Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, some of the hookers are armed, and even a set of those are WELL armed.

      [mock] I rolled up on this one bitch, and started to lay the smack down on her bitchass 'cause she fronted me when I hollaed at her fo' some play. Ho pulled a glock and shot me in the face! So I jacked a tricked out rider and backed over that bitch. Shut her ass up fo' sho'. [/mock]

      *adjusts work shirt and tie, regaining composure*

      Ahem, anyway. Some of the 'sex workers' in San Andreas carry either knives or handguns. On one occasion, I've seen one pull out a MAC-10 automatic weapon, and she tore me to ribbons.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    6. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. The game needs pimps.

    7. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's a pansy ass 9mm. those bullets are lightweight, unless she gets a lucky head shot or heart shot i'm not going down. not from a pansy ass 9mm. now a .45 caliber weapon, that'll knock me on my ass even if it just hits a lung. people have emptied whole 9mm clips into people and they've survived because no vital organs were hit. .45 bullets do so much damage that one can die of the hemmorage and internal bleeding from a single shell.

    8. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      Not quite the same as tanks, though.

    9. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by lustforlike · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the pedestrian's association hasn't kicked up a fuss too. I've killed far more random bystanders, mostly when swerving in order to pick up a prostitute.

    10. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1

      Sure. You just go to the other end of that gun range, we'll fire at you, and you can catch those "pansy ass" bullets.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    11. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In San Andreas, they do. If they have a knife or gun, they'll use it; and if they don't, they'll have at you with their fists and/or feet. This teaches me that it's far safer to kill a prostitute than to hit her.

    12. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Oh, or they (GTA whores) could defend themselves with lethal force. They're prostitutes, likely on drugs... what's going to prevent them from carrying a firearm illegally? You hit a prostitute with a baseball bat and she whips out a knife and cuts you, bitch! Or maybe she puts down and pulls a GLOCK from her cleavage and blows your shit away.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by hey! · · Score: 1

      I notice the rail passenger's association isn't complaining. They're probably thinking "bring it on".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Why haven't police done the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty goddamn obvious that you've never been shot by a pansy ass 9mm.

  9. Oh now something else makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other day I saw Steve from Steve's Autobody shop handing out free copies of GTA to 12 year old boys with the funniest smile on his face you've ever seen.

    I just assumed he was a pedofile.
    Steve, if you're reading this, I Apologize.

  10. Sex Workers... by Xymor · · Score: 0

    Wait, Isn't Prostituion illegal in US?

    1. Re:Sex Workers... by geniusj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Prostitution is illegal on a state-by-state basis. It is not illegal in Nevada, I'm not sure if there's anywhere else where that's the case..

    2. Re:Sex Workers... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The non-political kind is... supposedly. It depends on how much money is involved.

    3. Re:Sex Workers... by zamboni1138 · · Score: 1

      It is only a few counties in Nevada, not the whole state. It is very much illegal in the city of Las Vegas, for example.

    4. Re:Sex Workers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rhode Island. See Prostitute. As for everywhere else in the US, escort services skirt the law. It's legal to buy a date, but not sex. It just so happens that when you pay for an escort, the date often goes so well (even if a "date" never takes place), you often get sex in return. This way, the escorts can claim that sex took place because of attraction or whatever, and not money. In my area, escorts even advertise in the phone book. I think this form or prostitution is tolerated because the prostitutes aren't on display in the street, there is no brothel in anyone's backyard and "officially" it's not prostitution.

    5. Re:Sex Workers... by Khyber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Prostitution isn't illegal in Nashville, either, so I guess that means it's legal in Tennessee. They do have to be licensed hookers, though.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  11. Makes sense... by nacs · · Score: 1

    Pot, meet Kettle.

    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
    1. Re:Makes sense... by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Pot, meet Kettle.

      Oh, great. You had to bring the NORML folks into it...

  12. Sex workers outreach program? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    They seriously need to steal AT&Ts old slogan- reach out and touch someone.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Sex workers outreach program? by Locke03 · · Score: 1

      Really?! I though that was a sniper motto....

      --
      I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
  13. Exploitation is fun! by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    So are they going to sue the movie industry next for all the films that portray violent crime towards prostitutes? What about churches that use prostitution as a classic example of evil and immoral behavior? Stupid.

  14. They've got it backwards by szembek · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think they're looking at this all wrong. In GTA a prostitute makes your health improve, while in real life I would say your chances of getting syphilis are much higher than of that bullet wound in your leg healing after a visit with a hooker. With this logic they should look forward to increased business!

    --
    nothing
  15. In other news... by Godai · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...drug dealers, car thieves & other criminals are suing Hollywood because they claim movies encourage people to dress up like spiders and beat them up.

    In related news, the Plate Glass Association of America (PGAA) is contemplating class action suits of their own, citing numerous examples of films, games & other media where violence is perpetrated on -- or more commonly through -- their members.

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
  16. How's Jack going to react? by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Disclaimer: I am a Christian. However, Jack Thompson is of the notorious southern-baptist style bible-thumping crowd. This places him on the same side as prostitutes. I can't WAIT for someone to point this out to him.

    We should have a slogan:

    "Jack Thompson: Working with the street-walkers to keep your kids safe"
    "No-body has their pulse on the average American cum-catcher like Jack"

    1. Re:How's Jack going to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This places him on the same side as prostitutes. I can't WAIT for someone to point this out to him.

      Would you mind explaining why one can't oppose both prostitution and the depiction of the killing of prostitutes? I mean, what with your Christianity and all..

  17. Joke? by Unsus · · Score: 1
    Is this a joke? Sex Workers Outreach Project?!?
    They note that the games are a bad influence on children
    No offense, but if I wanted to know what's a bad influence for my kids, the last people I would ask would be a union of apparently proud prostitutes.
    1. Re:Joke? by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Is this a joke? Sex Workers Outreach Project?!?

      No, it's not. And if you read their website, you'd see why it's not. For one thing, they have a goal for the decriminaliztion for the consensual sex industry, among other things (such as laws to help protect prostitutes). What more they outline their motives in a clear way, showing that through reform prostitutes can be helped rather than left to fend for themselves.

      It's an intersting debate for where to draw the line between what laws are considered ethical. It's common for playing video games to be ethical, although sometimes they're content is not, but in the end they're legal. Murder is considered unethical, so it's illegal. Prostitiution is a strange one: prostitutes give their consent, so realistically they are not being harmed since they have the option of avoiding the situation if proper precautions are taken. Someone might argue that by consenting they are harming themselves, which is another matter all together, but you can say the same for tobacco.

      Their members have a different set of morals, and believe that their freedoms as citizens are being restricted by the morals of others. You don't have to agree with them, but at least they're being logical about it.

      Although I do see the humor in the irony in trying to get parents who probably view them as the lowest human lifeform to join their cause against the game. That's just silly.

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    2. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >prostitutes give their consent, so realistically they are not being
      >harmed since they have the option of avoiding the situation if proper
      >precautions are taken. Someone might argue that by consenting they
      >are harming themselves, which is another matter all together, but
      >you can say the same for tobacco.

      Not entirely so. It's true if you ignore the class system that the US has: if people were completely equal, then this wouldn't be such an issue. However, as everyone knows, not everyone is wealthy in the US. In short this is to help avoid the sentence "Sorry, Mommy can't read to you tonight, she needs to whore to get money for the heating." If prostituion were legal, the poor would be forced to whore.

      Now, if Paris Hilton was tricking - that'd be something different.

      Tobacco (or Pot, or Beer, for that matter) IS different. They all wreck YOUR body. No one is forcing you to have smoke, toke, or chug.

    3. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in other words, the lack of a decent US welfare system is the reason that prostitution can't be made legal in the States. In countries where there is decent welfare, so they would not be forced to whore (as you imply they would be in the Sstates), this would be fine then?

    4. Re:Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is prostitution inherently more harmful than having to work multiple physically demanding jobs? You may think its inherently more demeaning, but I don't see it. Yes, there is a growing divide between the classes, but that doesn't mean any job a poor person would take, but a rich person wouldn't should be banned. Paris Hilton also isn't going to be a cleaning lady, a nanny, or a farm worker, should those jobs be banned also?

    5. Re:Joke? by daliman · · Score: 1
      Trying not to comment on the grammatical murder that this is - "sometimes they're content is not, but in the end they're legal"... The second they're is OK. The first is not.

      Guess I failed on that not commenting thing...

    6. Re:Joke? by Foolhardy · · Score: 1
      However, as everyone knows, not everyone is wealthy in the US. In short this is to help avoid the sentence "Sorry, Mommy can't read to you tonight, she needs to whore to get money for the heating." If prostituion were legal, the poor would be forced to whore.
      How is that forcing? The alternative in your example is that Mommy has no means to pay for the heat so they freeze. If she had a better way to pay for it, she'd be doing it already. Apparently, Mommy feels that the money earned from prostitution is worth what she can buy with it, or she wouldn't have chosen that job. Even if prostitution is available, Mommy is still free to find some other way to make money (or spend her time/effort some other way) if she feels that prostitution isn't giving her an acceptable return.

      There are poor people. How is removing options for employment going to make their situation any better? If prostitution was an option, it would only increase the demand for cheap labor, raising its cost (i.e. raising individual wages for all the other jobs that those people could be filling).
    7. Re:Joke? by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how do the $1000/hour callgirls fit into your world view? They sure aren't short of a nickel, they probably make more than you or I. Equating all prostitutes with street walking crack whores is a gross over simplification of a complex situation. Whilst I have no desire to see people do unpleasant & dangerous work (of any kind) simply to make ends meet I also don't see what business it is of mine to tell someone what they can and can't do behind closed doors, given that no one else is being harmed. There are plenty of intelligent, educated, sane people working as prostitutes all over the world, and they do it because they want to not because they have to. More power to them.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:Joke? by Unsus · · Score: 1

      I was watching Cops one day, and the cops were saying how near the end of the month many women go out and prostitute themselves so that they can pay their rent. Another time, the cops caught this homosexual with aids prostituting; they said he keeps coming back out on the streets as soon as he is out of jail. I doubt many people find this moral. But let's talk about what's really important: Home Value. If you can get the prostitutes out of the streets, your property value will surely increase as a result.

    9. Re:Joke? by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      >Trying not to comment on the grammatical murder that this is - "sometimes they're >content is not, but in the end they're legal"... The second they're is OK. The first >is not.

      >Guess I failed on that not commenting thing...

      Yup. 'Guess you did.

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    10. Re:Joke? by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      >Not entirely so. It's true if you ignore the class system that the US has: if people were completely equal, then this wouldn't be such an issue. >However, as everyone knows, not everyone is wealthy in the US. In short this is to help avoid the sentence "Sorry, Mommy can't read to >you tonight, she needs to whore to get money for the heating." If prostituion were legal, the poor would be forced to whore.

      I even thought about this while writing, but chose to think of it this way:

      While the aspects of prostitution may be dangerous in a bad economic state (your walking-the-street hooker, if you will), so are many other jobs that low-income families might be "forced" to take. Take Coal Mining, for example. It's dangerous, but some people, especially in the past, have had very little choice, so they do it anyway. What can the US government do to help this situation, especially if, like in the past, mine managers took to profits over worker safety? Well, rather than make it illegal, they can make laws to make those who run coal mines to attempt to make their workers more safe.

      Of course, the analogy is not perfect, since the process of making prostitution illegal was not due to it's unsafe working conditions, but rather due to the reforming powers of lobbying groups trying to purify the American culture, such as the Woman's Christian Temperance Union. But the idea that making something dangerous legal shouldn't be a standalone action. On the contrary, the legalization of the the industry could provide a gateway to helping make more safe the entire notion of prostitution, meaning even if someone felt that they were "forced" into prostitution for economic reasons, they'd at least have laws as safegaurds for their safety rather than none at all.

      Will this happen in the US? Well, probably not anytime soon.

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    11. Re:Joke? by daliman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sometimes my inner grammar nazi plays up. I wonder if you can get therapy for it?

  18. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pedestrians call for ban on cars.

  19. News for nerds. by imstanny · · Score: 1

    This is almost as newsworthy as the story about the Superman Bulge.

  20. Prostitutes Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    well... they do....

  21. I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whore: "I promise to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

    Attorney: "Are you a prostitute?"

    Whore: "Yes, I am" ...

    CNN's Anderson Cooper: "And in today's news, the 1000th prostitute was thrown in jail for admitting they were in the illegal sex trade. Thousands more are lining up around the block to give their testimony to the supreme court...."

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      You know prostitution is legal in the US right? It is illegal in most states (all but Nevada I think) but I think you're a little off base.

    2. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      It would be more apt to say it's illegal everywhere except Nevada then to say it's legal if you live in any state as long as that state is Nevada.

      If you're a prostitute in America more than likely you are engaging in prostitution illegally.

    3. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by tomjen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whore with brains: "I plead the fith"
      Attorney: "Oh shit"

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    4. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by blackcoot · · Score: 1

      too bad there's that whole 5th amendment nonsense :-P

    5. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be more apt to say it's illegal everywhere except Nevada then to say it's legal if you live in any state as long as that state is Nevada.

      I disagree. Given there is no federal law banning it, prostitution is a inclusively legal in the US. That is to say, if there is a territory not governed by any particular state law that bans it then prostitution is legal in that jurisdiction.

      If you're a prostitute in America more than likely you are engaging in prostitution illegally.

      But if you're a member of an official organization called "Sex workers of America" the chances are you're not openly breaking any law, whether you're are a porn star or a legal prostitute. Sure maybe some of those people do break laws, but that has no bearing on their right to protest something.

    6. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's perfectly leagal in most of our solar system to commit murder too.

    7. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      You may be missing the point. A woman is a prostitute in a licensed brothel in Nevada, and testifies that she is such. How do you toss her in jail? If the trial is not in Nevada, she can't be jailed for it by the other state because it didn't happen in the other state. Warning: IANAL.

    8. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, it's not illegal to be a prostitute. It's illegal to solicit for prostitution.

      Prostitutes don't exactly hide the fact that they're prostitutes -- it would be pretty hard to get business if they did.

    9. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Mike570 · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing everybody say that prostitution is legal in Nevada and they're kind of right. Prostitution in BROTHELS is legal in Nevada. The brothels are regulated and the government makes sure the prostitutes are disease free and everything. Street walking prostitutes are NOT legal in Nevada or any other part of the country. You try to pick up a hooker in Vegas on a street corner, you may be spending some time in jail.

    10. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Attorney: "Are you a prostitute?"

      Whore: "Yes, I am" ...

      Attorney: "House or Senate?"

    11. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Being a prostitute is not a crime. Offering sex for money is a crime.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    12. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, thank god she didn't spell it correctly.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    13. Re:I an just see the trials on CourtTV now by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      If you look at the SWOP website, it is not only an organization entirely devoted to outreach to prostitutes, they have chapters in Alabama, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, and on the Campus of UCLA. Now not all SWOP members are prostitutes, but I doubt that the members who are are all legally licensed in the state of Nevada and working in brothels.

  22. The question is... by xutopia · · Score: 1

    What class, person or profession does GTA respect? Are prostitutes especially targetted? I'm sure running over lawyers would be more fun but they aren't street workers.

  23. Overload... by ModemRat · · Score: 0

    Ad Hominem overload...cannot...process.

  24. Take Two's Official Response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up bitches! Bang! Bang!

    *Their stolen car drives away*

  25. Huh by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    Isn't this rather like lawyers complaining abour their media image?

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:Huh by eqisow · · Score: 1

      No, it's not like that at all. What lawyers do is actually legal... usually.

    2. Re:Huh by ultranova · · Score: 1

      No, it's not like that at all. What lawyers do is actually legal... usually.

      Forget gold. He who reads the laws makes the rules.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  26. maybe they should join the cops by Depris · · Score: 1

    These prostitutes outta really get out there. Make some signs, do some marching, yell and scream. Get out there and join your Anti-GTA brothers in blue.

    If all this anti-video game crap can bring prostitutes and cops together at least we will garner some entertainment out of it.

    As it stands now, it's just pathetic.

    --
    I'll make you a deal. You pray to God for help and I'll stop the moment he shows up.
  27. Title of this article is misleading by bigdavex · · Score: 5, Informative

    They aren't calling for a ban. They think the game is a bad thing and want to discourage parents from allowing their children to play.

    Ban means "to prohibit especially by legal means" (Merriam-Webster).

    They're exercising a free speech right, not trying to infringe on others'.

    --
    -Dave
    1. Re:Title of this article is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good, some whores are telling parents what is bad for their kids to play....

      Should we also take advice from the junkie as to which drugs to use and which "bad" ones to avoid?

    2. Re:Title of this article is misleading by neoform · · Score: 0

      "They think the game is a bad thing and want to discourage parents from allowing their children to play."
      They think the game is bad? When was the last time they looked at their profession??

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:Title of this article is misleading by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      I thought that in the USA, trying to impinge upon others' free speech rights *is* free speech. (Or at least, that's what we commonly seem to cite as examples when we dismiss European countries for having weaker free speech rights: that they (some?) crack down on that kind of attempted impingement/hate speech/etc).

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Title of this article is misleading by Quintios · · Score: 1

      There's something ironic about a prostitute organization giving advice on parenting...

      --
      Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
    5. Re:Title of this article is misleading by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      I think that if parents can't understand the ratings on the entertainment they buy for their kids, hearing it from hookers isn't going to help.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    6. Re:Title of this article is misleading by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      You mean any more than the "M" rating already should?

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    7. Re:Title of this article is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a dumbass.

  28. Disappointed with Link... by Jamil+Karim · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the Sex Workers Outreach Project homepage, I clicked on "Calendar", but all I got was a list of upcoming events... =(

    1. Re:Disappointed with Link... by master_p · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but there were no "screenshots".

    2. Re:Disappointed with Link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't "coming events" all they do anyways?

  29. Not calling for a ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're asking people to boycott the game, not calling for it to be banned. In fact they specifically stated that they're not asking for censorship.

  30. wow ;) by Intangion · · Score: 1

    this has to be the funniest/stupidest thing ive read on here in a while.. also how can you get mad at an open ended game like this.. the whole thing is you can do EVERYTHING! should cab drivers get mad about the game because their cabs are being stolen in game? pilots get upset over their counterparts constantly crashing into things in game? boat owners outraged at the boat thefts in game? you can do just about anything...

    skydiver association mad about showing how easily you can splat from skydiving in the game!!

  31. its funny.. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

    where i live, prostitution isnt considered a job you want to have. People aren't "proud" to be prostitutes or strippers (yes i know theres a difference but one leads to the other usually), but they are sadly forced to sacrifice thier dignity to survive. I dont think its right to treat them as criminals and they definatly have rights regardless of the legality of prostitution but the idea of an organization seems to promote some sort of pride about it. I guess there's nothing wrong with pride, but it seems like the kind of buisness you'd be even prouder to one day rise above, but thats my opinion. anyway my point is, why are they protesting how prostitutes are depicted? everyone is depicted badly, and frankly anyone who ends up like the guy from GTA will probably not treat women OR prostitutes well either way. Just my 2 cents :P

  32. Prostitutes worried about their safety? by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    If prostitutes are really worried about their own safety, then why are they prostitutes in the first place?

    Idiots!

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:Prostitutes worried about their safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting paid for sex, and hanging out with pimps... that's justifies the risk of danger enough for me.

  33. poor GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..just can't get a break

  34. They must not have cable tv. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    If they had cable, they'd have been protesting just about every movie shown on the pay stations after 11pm for the past 20 years.

  35. Of all the claims... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This one makes the most sense. I've heard my share of B.S. "videogames made me do it" stories over the years, but this one has the most legitimate basis of them all. It stands to reason that some frat boy who is majorly into his GTA, either tries to treat a prostitute or a dancer in a similar manner because it is seen and portrayed as a given that you smack a ho. It really does promote the behavior and I could see the point.

    I know it all seems silly, prostitutes complaining and drawing parallels from a video game to real violence. But in reality prostitues are pretty much an accepted thing in America (even though many would have you believe otherwise) and after reading a book a while back about the Mustang Ranch in Vegas, I have a whole new outlook on them and their trade. The knee jerk reaction is to laugh it off, but I truly believe this compalint is the most valid yet.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Of all the claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really does promote the behavior

      It merely permits it as an effective stratagem, which says nothing about the question of whether this particular strategem is ethically permissible.

    2. Re:Of all the claims... by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      I agree. I especially enjoy how they try to treat the problem, not through banning the game, but rather getting people to boycott. There's a huge difference. From their web site: "Censorship is a blight on the freedoms we hold dear but we wholeheartedly encourage citizens to vote with their dollars by refusing to purchase products which encourage the denigration and destruction of prostitutes." Of all the people saying "We need to keep this game out of the hands of children", they finally got it right by trying to inform potentially unaware parents (sad, but there are still some out there) of the dangers that may be present in allowing young children to play it. Too bad it's an organization whose root cause will surely make it's message be taken so light-heartedly.

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    3. Re:Of all the claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know if this is a true story, or not (no way to verify it), but in a game developers' discussion group i was a part of a few years back one person told the story of overhearing a couple of coworkers bragging about how, because of how funny it was in the gta game (to them), they'd ordered themselves a hooker the night before and then beaten her and left her locked in a closet for a while. i must say i'm a bit skeptical as to the veracity of the story - i don't believe the developer who was relating the story was possibly making it up, but that the coworkers the developer overheard were possibly (hopefully probably) making it up. if it was true, though ... it'd be a pretty clear example of the game successfully promoting the behavior.

    4. Re:Of all the claims... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      I understand where you are coming from. But you do realise that prostitution is illegal in mos of the USA, right? I admittedly do not understand why it is still illegal given the other things that are legal today, but the fact remains that it is illegal.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    5. Re:Of all the claims... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Prostitution is as far from illegal as can be in the legal sense. Police know full well each and every street used for prostitution all across America. They know them by name. They turn a blind eye. The only time it becomes an issue is the crime, drugs, abuse, disease, murder, and underage prostitutes. Most "john's" are given a citation as long as they are clear of warrants.

      It is fully legal in Las Vegas, and those women are just as at risk for elevated levels of abuse. The "illegal" prostitutes don't have many of the "luxuries" of the legal worker nor the protection, while you or I may not agree with their line of work they are still human, and generally have some issues to place them there, they get beat-up, raped, and killed daily and live in that fear as it is... the added nut-jobs who are the kind to really get into GTA are the exact nut-jobs I would be scared shitless of going too far.

      While it may be "illegal" it is far from it in reality. Ask a policeman sometime how high they rank them on their list of priority, it will be below who's buying donuts and coffee that night.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    6. Re:Of all the claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it is seen and portrayed as a given that you smack a ho. It really does promote the behavior and I could see the point.

      I have seen and heard the phrase "smack a ho" maybe a thousand times, but never in GTA3. Music, movies, TV, yes. GTA3? Never.

      This is why people who have never even played the game have absolutely no business decrying the "deplorable behaviour" it encourages. There is as much encouragement to batter whores as there is to batter any of the civilians wandering the streets, which is to say that if a cop sees you doing it, he will chase you down, and if you do it excessively the cops will show up soon enough.

    7. Re:Of all the claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Christchurch, New Zealand (A small city of 400k) we regular get GTA style killings. Prostutes are often run over and killed. Pedestrians are also heavily targets with people driving on footpaths to take out pedestrians. But i think its the prostutes that suffer the highest death rate from deliberate running over. There has been a lot of calls for banning the game because of the regular GTA style killings. I think its more because people arnt well behaved and not the game itself.

    8. Re:Of all the claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, i think so too.
      I stopped playing the gta series after the first two parts because i had the feeling that in the third part (meaning the first real 3D one) there was too much encouragement to behave like a pimp. There is quite a difference between running over funny little coloful dots in a just as colorful 2D car and "playing" to exploit a quite realistically modelled female sexually.
      I'm no superior morals maniac, but i think EVERYBODY should be treated with the dignity that a human being deserves. And yes, although it might only be virtual, the pimplike behaviour in the game has at least a little influence on the players overall behaviour.
      I know that you don't HAVE to do this to win the game, but on the other hand: Not all despicable behaviour should be possible, only because it's possible in real live. For instance, there would rightfully be an outcry if there was a mission in which you had to kill black people to please some white supremacy fucknuts or something alike. Or if you had to torture some innocent guy.
      I know these analogies are kind of weak, but remember nonetheless: most prostitutes that work via pimp don't do it voluntarily.

    9. Re:Of all the claims... by Pray_4_Mojo · · Score: 1

      This one makes the most sense. I've heard my share of B.S. "videogames made me do it" stories over the years, but this one has the most legitimate basis of them all. It stands to reason that some frat boy who is majorly into his GTA, either tries to treat a prostitute or a dancer in a similar manner because it is seen and portrayed as a given that you smack a ho. It really does promote the behavior and I could see the point.

      Yeah...it must be a stupid idea...so it'd have to take a special kind of idiot to treat a dancer like shit, right? Like a frat boy. (They are as they say, Rick James, bitch.)

      Its too bad that most dancers bring a bodyguard (with a sidearm) with them for 'private parties'. Its a little hard to abuse someone when they've got a goon and a pistol and all you've got is your whiteboy college attitude.

      Nevermind the fact that most fraternities these days are split down the middle about bringing a stripper to their house. Some people don't participate in such events because they believed in those clauses of "treating women with deceny and respect" that supposedly make a fraternity man 'respectable'.

      But hey, we sure like Halo!

  36. In other news... by steveo777 · · Score: 1
    "Children in Ms. Johnson's 2nd grade class from ABC elementary school took a field trip to the red light district to learn about the habits and lives of a different kind of public servent. Here's little Jacky Shultz, live from downtown"

    "Thanks, Ted. I've got little Suzy here who seems to be having a terrific time. So, Suzy, what's your favorite part of today's field trip.?"

    "I liked it when the man in the fuzzy clothes hit the lady and made them give and share. Because sharing is good!"

    "Right you are Suzy! Next we have Suzy's teacher. Ms. Johnson, I understand that the class was originally scheduled to make a visit to the zoo. What made you decide to change your planes?"

    "Well, lately I've felt that the field trips that children experience are lacking. They go to the zoo, they see some monkey's doing it. We've been to the paper mill, to the crayon factories... I thought I'd mix it up a bit and show a different kind of industry. In stead of monkeys doing it, I thought we'd show them real people, doing it hours a day to make a living."

    "There you have it! Back to you, Ted."

    Right... Hookers aren't exactly what I would call models of social development. Don't get me wrong, I feel bad that they are in a plight that the feel forces them to do what they do (or sickend that they enjoy it). But, in no way do I think I would ever consider one a role model.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  37. Hypocrites by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    I have to say these prostitutes are pretty hypocritical...

    "They note that the games are a bad influence on children, and might encourage rape and violent behavior towards prostitutes in real life."

    What about the issue of kids being encouraged to PICK UP a prostitute in real life? Looks like that one managed to slip by them...wonder why...

    And for the record, I have no moral issue against prostitution, its the worlds oldest profession...but I only support the regulated kind, where they work in safe environments, have regular testing and support, etc. Not this crap where you pick up one in your car and drive to a quiet place. Children should NOT be encouraged to do that.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  38. Sure, I'll feed the trolls.. by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

    People like Jack are like the Sanhedrin of old jewish faith, and like the upper caste in Hindu/Indian cultures: they don't like to even get near what they consider "undesireables".

    Him being on the same side as prostitutes in his mind is like when NAMBLA shows up at a gay rights/pride march: yes, technically, they are marching for your ideal, but what they stand for otherwise is REALLY going to hurt your case.

    He's claimed to be doing God's work many a time. The irony that a class of people that he wouldn't be caught dead with are now trying to champion his case is going to put him in a tough spot.

    To quote skull: "GLEE!"

    1. Re:Sure, I'll feed the trolls.. by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      "The irony that a class of people that he wouldn't be caught dead with are now trying to champion his case is going to put him in a tough spot.

      Eh, not really. That's like saying someone is like a Nazi because neither would want to drink poison.

      (No, I'm not saying GTA is poison).

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    2. Re:Sure, I'll feed the trolls.. by Nivoset · · Score: 1

      you are bringing some form of logic to this... that is your downfall. Extreemests in any direction tend to miss (or ignore) actual facts for what they want.

      Though, i would like to know if the mental hamster wheel could be harnessed in his mind for renewable energy.

      --
      Movies made by a crazy person

      http://www.youtube.com/marginalpro
    3. Re:Sure, I'll feed the trolls.. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      im being on the same side as prostitutes in his mind is like when NAMBLA shows up at a gay rights/pride march: yes, technically, they are marching for your ideal

      • Gays: want to screw each other in peace
      • NAMBLA: want to screw young boys

      Yeah, same cause.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Sure, I'll feed the trolls.. by Otter · · Score: 1
      People like Jack are like the Sanhedrin of old jewish faith, and like the upper caste in Hindu/Indian cultures: they don't like to even get near what they consider "undesireables".

      I'll let the Christians worry about your spouting off about Christianity; might I suggest that you at least spare us your ignorance of Judaism? I'm not even sure what you're confusing the Sanhedrin with -- Nazirim? Cohanim?

  39. Not the point by GoddessOfDeath · · Score: 1

    The fact that it is only prostitutes complaining (and noone else) does not take away their right to complain. If they feel as though they're being threatened, they have the right to say something about it - as do cops or any other targetted groups. Just because they haven't as a group condemned the game, does not necessarily mean they like it, or are okay with it. Using that justification is like Tony Blair saying that just because only a million people marched against the war with Iraq, the rest of London really liked the war. Sorry if I misunderstood your point, but that is how I read it.

  40. Johns by wk633 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lots of comments on here about pot and kettle and prostitution being illegal and imoral.

    Personally, I can't stand people who put down sex trade workers, but don't save any derrision for the Johns. If you think prostitutes are low-lifes, then quit paying them.

    1. Re:Johns by McNastyMan · · Score: 1

      Are you saying prostitution should be an accepted and encouraged act in our society and culture? And, are you saying, that you have been a paying customer to prostitution?

    2. Re:Johns by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you think geeks will really give up their best chance to get laid?

      Personally, I say quit with the double standard and legalize it.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:Johns by wk633 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm saying that people who demonize hookers but don't have anything bad to say about Johns are hypocrits.

      I feel sorry for hookers more than anything. It's pretty low on the scale of desirable jobs. I don't think prostitution should be encouraged by any means. Accepted, well, anything that makes it safer would probably be a good idea. A lot of times making things illegal just pushes them underground. And no, I don't think 'accepted' equals 'encouraged'. For example: Kids will have sex. Give them condoms, and teach them about the dangers of sex too early.

      No, I've never used the services of a prostitute, paid or otherwise.

    4. Re:Johns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And no, I don't think 'accepted' equals 'encouraged'.

      In theory, analog should be more precise than digital because it represents an infinite range of values but in practice the discrete nature of digital makes copying more accurate. Language is similar, for copying reasons either the word (for example, "legal") is used in a sentence or it's not. You can't just use part of the word ("leg") although it is possible to use modifiers ("barely legal", "not legal", etc.).

      Because laws are based on language, this creates the impression that actions have binary consequences. Either something is "legal" or it is not "legal".

      In the reality, however, all actions have many complicated consequences some of which are more desirable and some of which are less desirable. If someone takes their money and buys their son a birthday present rather than donating the money to prevent an AIDS orphan from starving to death then on the positive the son is happy but on the negative the orphan starves to death.

      When it comes to prostitution, on one hand there is individual freedom and on the other hand there is safety. Both are valid and important goals. The problem is that the government has to either classify "prostitution" as "legal" or "illegal". In reality "prostitution" can encompass a whole range of activities which have a very complex range of consequences some of which are desirable and many of which are undesirable.

    5. Re:Johns by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
      Geeks' best chance to get laid is getting some game.

      And no, I'm not talking about video game.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  41. Now a group I can agree with by identity0 · · Score: 1

    "Sure, I'll boycott GTA - if you'll do me some 'favors'" *nudge nudge, wink wink*

    Well, finally a group I can have sympathy for. Seriously, the depiction in GTA of hookers is not exactly positive, and while it mirror's society's treatment of prostitutes, it's not sommething to encourage. Running over hookers seems to e pretty common, even if it's not a stated goal in the game.

    And to other posters talking about how cops and gangsters are depicted in the game - there are enough positive depictions of both in other media (too much for gangsters, really), so they don't really need them.

    In closing: hooray for hookers!! (No, I've never used their services. I swear.)

    (Say, does anyone know where to contact, er, beautiful professinal women in the Portland, OR area?)

    1. Re:Now a group I can agree with by z23rd_hsuan · · Score: 1

      (Say, does anyone know where to contact, er, beautiful professinal women in the Portland, OR area?) . . try craigslist

    2. Re:Now a group I can agree with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  42. Game vs Reality by McNastyMan · · Score: 1

    If these prostitutes want to show that prostitutes in GTA are such a bad influence, and provoke immoral acts, such as violence, which is learned to be practiced in real life, then maybe these prostitutes should stop being prostitutes if they think prostitutes corrupt youth. It would certainly be less hypocritical, whether people listened to them any more or not.

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Re:A little late to complain by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Well, my guess would be having lots of sex for money.

    I understand business is good with the geek set.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  45. Strange bedfellows by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Prostitutes and religious zealots are both against the GTA series. What stange bedfellows...

    1. Re:Strange bedfellows by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Maybe not as strange as you think... just more public than normal.

    2. Re:Strange bedfellows by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      What stange bedfellows...

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Strange bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Hillary is there.... she's kind of a zealot and a whore at the same time, I guess, eh?

      GTA was threatened a few years back by a womens' group demanding that the developers remove the players ability to hit women, Rockstar refused to give in and so the beat goes on.

    4. Re:Strange bedfellows by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be the first time a religious zealot and a prostitute were bedfellows :)

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    5. Re:Strange bedfellows by British · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm just waiting for a group of drug dealers to protest GTA.

      Yes, we have everyone from all walks of life protesting GTA. All the good & bad people(depending on your perspective) are putting aside their differences to stop GTA. GTA is helping unite the world. Pimps will stop slapping their hoes, drug dealers will stop killing deadbeat buyers and Hatians will stop, um, whatever Hatians do for a moment to protest a freakin' video game.

      Before GTA, wow, we were so blind to the social problems in the world. We only needed a video game to finally reflect it!

    6. Re:Strange bedfellows by RandomPrecision · · Score: 1

      (rimshot)

    7. Re:Strange bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the first Christian women were prostitutes. Look it up. But if video games made us do anything, we'd all be on the terrorist watch list, assuming we aren't anyway.

    8. Re:Strange bedfellows by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as bedfellows they are certainly not strang ers

    9. Re:Strange bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, that wasn't even the first.

    10. Re:Strange bedfellows by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      (rimshot)

      (rimjob)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    11. Re:Strange bedfellows by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      Prostitutes and religious zealots are both against the GTA series. What stange bedfellows...

      But hardly new. Years ago the radical left and the far far right both fought pornography. Google up Women Against Pornography or Andrea Dworkin.

    12. Re:Strange bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they are both linked to politicians. Strange isn't it?

  46. Great PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They find hidden sex scenes in the game and it gets lots and lots of free press.

    Prostitutes object to violence in the game - more free press.

    I wonder if there's a puppet-master at the game company pulling all the strings in a controversy-gets-press conspiracy.

  47. In other news.... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Car thieves, drug dealers and gang-bangers are outraged at their portayal as criminals in the game GTA...

    1. Re:In other news.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Car thieves, drug dealers and gang-bangers are outraged at their portayal as criminals in the game GTA...

            Please, it's not car thieves, it's previously owned vehicle redistributors; it's not drug dealers, it's recreational pharmacology suppliers; and it's not gang-bangers it's fraternal empowerment groups. Sheesh, honestly, no wonder these struggling elements of society are having such a hard time.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  48. say wha? by manJerk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    you cant rape the willing...

    I wonder when ford and other car companies are going to step in and demand justice because GTA encourages violent behavior towards cars?

    or maybe the anti-gun people would like to jump on board becuase GTA encourages kids to carry 10 consealed weapons on their persons at any given time including rocket launchers and flame throwers!

    I personally find it offencive that you can run a red light in GTA and not have any consiquenses.

    since when has bitching about shit taken the place of independant thought?

    "two independant thought alarms in one day?" -seymore skinner

    --
    -Boycot shampoo! demand real poo!
    1. Re:say wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you cant rape the willing...

      No, but you can rape a prostitute, just like you can rape your own wife or girlfriend. Just because someone may be willing to have sex with you, under certain circumstances, it doesn't mean there is no possible way you can rape her.

  49. show me by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Show me the mission in any of the GTA series that requires you to beat, kill, or otherwise be violent towards a prostitute. I've finished the storylines in all three of the PS2 versions, I wasted many an hour playing the PC version of the original, but never got a shot at GTA2.

    So where's the "Kill rape and murder all the hookers" mission?

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  50. I like hunting Elvis impersonators myself. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    But there is nothing like stealing tanks from the Army when they come for you (Granted it does'nt work as well in SA).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  51. Duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're worried gun totting videogamers getting 'a free ride'.

  52. RTFA, not the headlines. by cduffy · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're condemning the game, but not calling for a ban.

    1. Re:RTFA, not the headlines. by porges · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Note that you have to go 2 links deep to figure this out, since GameSpot made the original error.

    2. Re:RTFA, not the headlines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so, Rhode Island also legalizes prostitution, but being a john is illegal.

  53. In other news... by merc · · Score: 1

    Prostitutes have an association.

    *blinks*

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  54. Do you know how much strippers make? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    They don't have to sell anything beyond a lap dance.

    They may of course be giving it up for prime shifts, that happens at some places. You'll recognize those places as they have very few really hot strippers.

    Those that whore are the exception and are looked down on by other strippers (I know a couple of ex-stippers well).

    Perhaps you should do more research at the nudie bar. As they say 'You won't get fucked, you will get screwed'.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Do you know how much strippers make? by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      strippers were a small part of my post. forgetting strippers, and only talking about prostitutes everything else still stands. unless you're denying prostitution's existence or something.

  55. The new rallying cry... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Won't someone please think of the prostitutes!

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:The new rallying cry... by vsprintf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Won't someone please think of the prostitutes!

      And, according to the blurb, won't someone please think of all those children who are allowed to play MATURE-ONLY games being taught to . . . disrespect prostitutes . . . whoa, that's kinky in some weird sense. So, we could conclude that the widespread use of GTA by minors is actually a planned conspiracy by the morally righteous to stop prostitution, while their (Thompson) tools decry the situation. And finally, the difference between good and evil is obvious to all.

      (Well, it's not all that obvious to me, but Beyond Good & Evil was a really good game. :)

    2. Re:The new rallying cry... by dw604 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You better cover your kids' eyes when you go to East Hastings, Vancouver, BC. There are 5000 meth/heroin/coke/crackheads and prostitutes wandering the streets any time of day. It's amusing watching them do the funky chicken walking across the road or jumping in front of your car proclaiming themselves Jesus when you're doing 55km/h with the doors locked hoping not to catch a red light...

      Hookers are trash and they should not be defended. Instead, we should all throw pennies at them until they get off the drugs and get a real respectable career. I'd have respect for them if their job actually took skill, but how much skill does it take to lay on your back and be so high you don't even know what's going on. I *might* have more respect for a hooker who doesn't take drugs, but most of them down a 26er of vodka, do meth, heroin, coke, whatever, because they hate themselves for doing what they do. These are people who need help.

      The kids today are fucked. I am usually an optimist and I have had faith in the general 'goodness' and compassion of the majority of people, but when I hear about the statistics in our schools today I become afraid. I have a little sister who is 14 and 95% of the people in her school do coke, sleep with 25 yr olds (these are 14 yr old girls), and generally just don't have any idea of what it takes to survive. The guys, in turn, are RAPING these girls at parties, growing up to be sex-obsessed assholes and pedophiles, etc.

      These kids' parents give them whatever they want without ever teaching them wrong from right. I think there is an enormous responsibility for parents to prevent brainwashing from the media (and other people) where people are seen as objects. We need to teach the next generation about morals, tolerance, and respect instead of taking the easy way out, ignoring the problem, becoming 'zombies' ourselves, and ultimately dying unhappy.

      The kids aren't paying attention. There are too many flashy video games, too many movies about being pimps, too many pop-star dumbass skanks, too many easy hookups with bar-sluts - it's easy to see why they might be distracted. They're being conditioned to live fast and die young.

      The STDs are spreading more and more rapidly. It's time for the smart ones to cut loose and watch as the others build upon the reason for the eventual revolution. One day we can only hope, as it was just 50 years ago, being promiscuous will no longer be popular and we will see long-term marriage grow in numbers and people treating each other with compassion instead of as competition or a prize.

    3. Re:The new rallying cry... by somersault · · Score: 1

      all very true. I dont like being a sex obsessed asshole :/ though I thought all guys were? >_>

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:The new rallying cry... by zez · · Score: 1

      Sounds like I need to move to Vancouver!

    5. Re:The new rallying cry... by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      Won't someone please think of the prostitutes!

      I was also wondering what the local drug dealer's union thinks about the way that they're treated in the GTA franchise. I mean, I must have killed hundreds of those guys in GTA. They pack guns, but they carry so much more money than the street ho's. In fact, given the cash that drug dealers carry and the lack of cash that the ho's carry, it's not even worth killing the ho's. It's just a possibility in the game...just like killing anyone else. Won't someone please think of the drug dealers?

      Here's another idea. It's not possible to have any fun and avoid offending people. Apparently, that's just how things are going now. How about asking people who are offended by certain forms of entertainment to avoid using said forms of entertainment? Those who whine -- we can just call them assholes, ignore any further whining, and simply be done with it?

      --

      -Turkey

    6. Re:The new rallying cry... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Wow. I always though Canada was supposed to be the better half of North America. I have a little trouble with your numbers, since I don't think there is anywhere in the US where 95% of 14-year-olds are doing coke and having sex. If the problem is so widespread in Canada, I'd agree there is a real problem with parental supervision. Since I grew up with some friends from Canada, it seems hard to believe that things could be that lax.

      Hookers are trash and they should not be defended. Instead, we should all throw pennies at them until they get off the drugs and get a real respectable career.

      Well, let's take an honest prostitute who gets a hundred bucks for screwing one guy, leaves him happy, and admits it. Compare that to someone with a "respectable career" like Carly Fiorina who screws several thousand employees, leaves them out of work, bankrupt, and miserable. I'm gonna have to give my support to the honest prostitute instead of the dishonest corporate whore.

      One day we can only hope, as it was just 50 years ago, being promiscuous will no longer be popular and we will see long-term marriage grow in numbers and people treating each other with compassion instead of as competition or a prize.

      Sure, but I think it's more like respect than "compassion".

  56. Finally. by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Everyone gets oh-so-pissed and righteous about the game being about killing cops and nobody seems to give a shit about prostitutes, who are treated equally bad in the game.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  57. That's nothing by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I was playing a game where I ordered my tachyon bolt copter to massacre a whole bunch of Colonel Santiago's soldiers. I didn't even feel any regret. I guess that's why the military is calling for a ban on games like Alpha Centauri.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  58. one the other hand by friedman101 · · Score: 1

    Popular society isn't doing prostitutes any favors these days. Look at the replies here. "Hookers suck!" +4 Funny!!!! "Hookers blow!!!" +5 Insightful Prostituion is legal in some parts of the States (as well as most parts of the world). You tell me what's more degrading, being paid to have sex or spending 30 years suckling at the corporate teat. Do the prostitutes have a valid point? I don't know, let's see what happens to a game that glorifies killing firemen and mouth-breething programmers.

  59. Pot calls kettle black by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> They (prostitutes) note that the games are a bad influence on children...

    Thats funny... prostitutes moralizing about software being a bad influence on kids... Of course, conducting their own profession in front of kids is just fine, right?

  60. In breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the NLPAJP (National Lobby for the Protection of Angry-Jerk Pedestrians) also indicated that they would be lobbying for GTA to be banned due to the way that it's very easy to mow down law-abiding citizens with cars/trucks/bikes/tanks. Mr. A. J. Ped told our reporter, "we're running scared man, but we just can't get out of the way fast enough, it's a jungle out there man, a jungle!".

    Rockstar Games have released a statement saying that the pedestrians in GTA "are not real" and the public has nothing to worry about especially since 99.99% of all Americans are now so overweight they can't get off of the couch anyway so they are unlikely to be involved in a hit and run incident.

  61. This is stupity at its finest by Bitchxatbxworld.com · · Score: 1

    Now you are a prostitue, what your doing is illegal, and you want to bitch about a game that people buy. Grow up ladies. Stop selling your ass on the street go to college and program games that don't involve killing prostitutes.

  62. Looking at it all wrong... by yomahz · · Score: 1

    They note that the games are a bad influence on children, and might encourage rape and violent behavior towards prostitutes in real life.

    Why all the hate? Don't they realize that it also discourages kids from becoming prostitutes? Hell, that's less competition for them but less variety for me. Hell, I should be the one bitching. Hmm.. I think I'll write a note to my senator.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  63. Preposterous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next? A call to Arm the Homeless?

    1. Re:Preposterous! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      A call to Arm the Homeless?

            Most of them have got 2 arms anyway what do they want more for? Oh...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  64. This is a serious problem by greg1104 · · Score: 1

    Clearly their concerns here are justified, because that's how I spend my time. Just today, I beat down an old lady with a baseball bat, jacked two cars, blew away a cop with a shotgun, and fired rockets at a passing helicopter. Hiring a ho and roughing her up is the only way I've learned that gives a day like that a "happy ending".

  65. Another Pot-Kettle Comment by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

    It's like copyright violators moralising about monopolistic company behaviour... oh wait!

  66. Feminism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not new here, but I've never read such a bunch of insensitive, ignorant and idiotic comments on one topic. It fairly screams of the stereotype of pasty fat men that can't talk to women let alone understand them. Would you guys generalize like this about, say, a particular race?

    Knock it off and stop projecting your values and assumptions on to people you know nothing about.

    1. Re:Feminism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knock it off and stop projecting your values and assumptions on to people you know nothing about.

            Get back to work, bitch. You ought to know better than to talk with your mouth full anyway.

  67. I'll give you $20 to say watching it makes you hot by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

    :P

    Seriously though, the few violent acts in the actual story line are you have to stop someone from beating up on them.

    --

    -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  68. You're already selling yourself by tengu1sd · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've always wanted to be a prostitute. This whole IT thing is just temporary.

    Let's see, hookers sell a few hours of their time, perform questionable acts for money, and in the ideal situation, make you feel like you'r the most important part of their day. Tries to avoid virus and worm outbreaks with best practices.

    System admin, sells all of his or her time, performs questionable acts for money. May try to make his customers happy. Tries to avoid virus and worm outbreaks with best practices. Demanding customers may make this difficult.

    Consultant. See hooker.

    All in all, a hooker has better pay scale, less hours, and a chance to negotiate a better working environment. Also less likely to be outsourced.

    1. Re:You're already selling yourself by spac3manspiff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both are hands-on jobs..

    2. Re:You're already selling yourself by cloak42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      All in all, a hooker has better pay scale, less hours, and a chance to negotiate a better working environment. Also less likely to be outsourced.

      Plus there's actually the occasional orgasm for a hooker. When was the last time you were able to come while adding a rule to your firewall?

    3. Re:You're already selling yourself by Lehk228 · · Score: 1, Funny

      if your hooker has worms she is probably already dead.... then again you probably already knew that and paid extra for the service.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:You're already selling yourself by karlto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also less likely to be outsourced.

      I can't say that I've worked at many places with an in-house hooker...

    5. Re:You're already selling yourself by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >> When was the last time you were able to come while adding a rule to your firewall?

      When was the last time you weren't?

    6. Re:You're already selling yourself by lloydtesterman · · Score: 1

      I don't have to answer this.

    7. Re:You're already selling yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also less likely to be outsourced.
      Many countries including the U.S. import women (and sometime little girls) from less well-off countries and use them as sex slaves. I think that's close enough.
    8. Re:You're already selling yourself by Hortense+Yaya · · Score: 1

      Also less likely to be outsourced

      That would give new meaning to being *laid* off.

    9. Re:You're already selling yourself by really? · · Score: 4, Funny

      This morning.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    10. Re:You're already selling yourself by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Just the fact that you would even CONSIDER asking that just highlights your six-figure Slashdot ID.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:You're already selling yourself by cheaphomemadeacid · · Score: 0

      last week but don't tell anyone...

    12. Re:You're already selling yourself by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Well you can't just pick any firewall to add a rule to. You want something like Checkpoint and not BlackICE. It just doesn't feel the same and who is going to really protect you w/o going down? Oh wait...nevermind.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    13. Re:You're already selling yourself by raddan · · Score: 4, Funny
      When was the last time you were able to come while adding a rule to your firewall?

      You're obviously not using pf!

    14. Re:You're already selling yourself by raddan · · Score: 1

      Checkpoint seriously blows. Rule 9999? WTF? When did I put that one in? Oh wait, implied rules, riiiight. Too bad you need to pay Checkpoint for the privilege of reading the documentation to your $6000 firewall. And the VPN client works, like what, half the time?

    15. Re:You're already selling yourself by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Yes, you got your Funny mod points, but "hookers" do not necessarily sell a few hours of their time. There are Eastern European girls in London and Bristol that have been forced to have sex with over a hundred men in a week.

      And it's still happening.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  69. Err no. by cerebis · · Score: 1
    Actually, in countries where prostitution is legalized and regulated to a degree, there are both men and women who choose to do it and they're not unwashed desparate people with no other choices. It _is_ simply sex for money.

    Prostitution is so stigmatized in the US, its a joke. Especially when you consider how prevalent it is despite that fact.

    1. Re:Err no. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      oh i'm sorry, i thought we were talking about the USA, what with the site being called swop-usa.org. And Nevada being the only state where prostitution is actually organized, i'm pretty sure the majority of prostitutes in the country are "street walkers." Maybe other countries have a better system. Simple fact is, we dont. It is not an issue of morals it is an issue of fact. You can glamorize it all you want, but it is not a pretty buisness. And it isnt only America either. Do you really think all those girls in Thailand enjoy thier lives? Maybe some more "refined" countries have been able to "accept" it, but that is besides the point because that is NOT what I'm talking about. Oh yeah, and the GTA prostitutes are streetwalkers, they arent some legalized, fancy form of prostitution. I'm pretty sure the makers of GTA designed thier prostitutes after the girls who grew up in shit neighborhoods and had nothing else left, not some legal prostitute who made a choice. So basically, what you say about other countries may be true, simple fact is, its irrelavent to the topic at hand.

    2. Re:Err no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but in Germany, if you refuse to take a job assigned to you, you don't get social services... Since prostution is a legal and regulated, it's considered an actual job, and if you don't take a job, you're out of luck!

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/ne ws/2005/01/30/wgerm30.xml

  70. What about everyone else? by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

    I mean, it's not just prostitutes that get slaughtered wholesale in GTA. Last I checked, you could kill just about everyone from old ladies crossing the street to cops trying to gun your ass down. I don't see the AARP ganging together to protest the old-lady-killing in GTA.

  71. hare hare...splat....gouranga! by __aapspi39 · · Score: 1

    If anyone has a beef with the GTA games it's the Hare Krishna; these guys got an really hard time in the 1st game.

    As soon as you went after them they'd really get those skinny limbs moving in no time, vaulting cars and running away for miles. It wasn't easy but if you killed a whole line of them you earned a huge cash bonus- $2000 if i remember right.

    I don't remember the Krishna complaining too much (in real life)- maybe they're so busy chanting that they miss out on seminal video games like GTA.

    1. Re:hare hare...splat....gouranga! by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

      Krishan's are not allowed to watch tv, read books, play video games or any other such popular culture stuff.

    2. Re:hare hare...splat....gouranga! by __aapspi39 · · Score: 1

      What's their position on stolen police vehicles i wonder? In the game they seemed to have a real aversion towards them, sprinting away at first sight. Why, oh why did they remove the Krishnas from subsequent games; they were an excellent feature. Whenever i hear them and their little cymbals on Oxford St it still makes me smile.

  72. That like... by dentar · · Score: 1

    The national street illegal drug dealers association coming out and saying "don't do drugs."

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  73. obligatory carlin by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    "Selling's legal. Fucking's legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?!?!!"

    But seriously, selling fucking is legal in some areas of Nevada (but as my friend found out -- NOT LEGAL IN VEGAS, STRANGELY ENOUGH!)

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  74. Hmmm by Xserv · · Score: 1

    Holy shit.. I've seen it all...

    I thought we were heading for a downward spiral when the last Adam Sandler movie came out but damn...

    I'm going to go pimp-slap some more ho's on GTA.

    X

    --
    "I love lamp."
  75. In other news... by Randseed · · Score: 1

    In other news, drug dealers are up in arms after a police show depicted a murder of one of their small screen counterparts on this week's episode of "24."

  76. Not here in the US... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    Not likely (shouldnt go through, anyway) to go through here in the US since prostitution is illegal here. How can you complain about what you are doing if its illegal in the first place? It would be like cocain smugglers trying to complain to the ATF (Alcohol Tabbaco & Firearms enforcement) that dead druggies in the morgue make the smugglers look bad.

    1. Re:Not here in the US... by radish · · Score: 1

      Sure it's illegal in most parts of the US (not all though, and it's legal in much of the ROTW). Does that mean they shouldn't be treated as human beings? Speeding is illegal - hell I bet you've done it once or twice. Is it OK to beat you up, criminal?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  77. I thought for sure I'd seen it all, but... by j!mmy+v. · · Score: 1

    ...now prostitutes are up in arms about a game depicting the treatment of prostitutes as...

    ...whores?

    Shrug.

    --
    -- often wrong; never in doubt
  78. Shut up, bitch! by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    Get back outside and get me my money before I open a can of GTA on your ass!

  79. normally i support... by critical_v · · Score: 1

    normally i support the organized efforts of sex workers, but i guess this group has caught the "blame video games for stuff that existed before video games" meme. imagine a slightly different scenario in which a popular video game featured a prostitute as a main character. imagine angry mothers complaining that the game is teaching their children to become prostitutes. is this a case of fallacy of the single cause / false cause? i realize i'm preaching to the choir here (i think, anyway). i'm willing to concede that possibly some people will do stupid things in part because they played GTA...but causality is complex, and people have done stupid and violent things since...oh, i don't know, all of recorded history. i think i'll start a Sex Workers for the Recognition of Causal Complexity Task Force.

    --
    You sure 'bout dat?
  80. In other news... by east+coast · · Score: 3, Funny

    The heroin lobby is calling for a boycott of the latest SWAT video game claiming that it gives them a bad name and portrays them as little more than common thugs who exploit the addicted.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  81. Internet Access? by CrashRoX · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that prostitutes perform their services because they are in need of money and or drugs/alcohol. I never really imagined too many of them to go home to a computer and hop on the internet. Let alone know anything about programming a website. Maybe they head the local library to check their email between shifts. Do you think they send out spam? I bet if you went on monster you could find a slew of prostitutes (maybe the AOL member directory is a better place to look).

    1. Re:Internet Access? by radish · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that prostitutes perform their services because they are in need of money and or drugs/alcohol.

      Tell me - why do you do your job? Is it partly because you are in need of money? Thought so. Where do you get your internet connection? You pay for it, with that money? Wow.

      It appears that you can't see the difference between a crack whore and a highly paid escort. They're both prostitutes, but one earns more than you ever will and probably runs their own website. There's a big wide world out there.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  82. I'm really sick of by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 1

    the frat boy stereotype. Do you really think that being in a fraternity has any real effect on how you view/treat women? It doesn't. People get that behaviour loooong before college. And that's what the prostitutes are trying to convey. That KIDS shouldn't be exposed to this kind of behavior, which is dead on. Your accusing reasonably well-educated people of misconduct and idiocy is just spouting stereotypes that you have no experience with.

    1. Re:I'm really sick of by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      No offense, but I graduated from Penn State. I also have a very close friend who was in a fraternity at Robert Morris. I am quite "experienced" and I am not simply spouting off a "stereotype." Not only is it not a stereotype fraternities tend to breed this agressive behavior towards women because guys being guys want to show off for their buddies. I have seen my share of it, so please spare me the lecture on all fraternities being filled with good-natured, hard working, 4.0GPA students. You're kidding yourself. They are havens for testosterone and perfect places for the mentality of GTA to be acted out in real life. Well-educated or not. I had a close friend who was #1 in our H.S. die within months of his freshman year of college due to an overdose, education has no bering on dumb decisions.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    2. Re:I'm really sick of by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you've experienced the stereotype confirmation process. That is, once you have a stereotype in your head, there is a tendency to see every instance that confirms it and filter out the counterexamples.

    3. Re:I'm really sick of by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you want to kid yourself. Sure there are exceptions, as with anything, but I've been to my fair share of frat houses and parties across a number of colleges and fraternities and I'm quite happy to state that the reality is exactly what I stated.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  83. so that means by morolen · · Score: 1

    So by that measure, If drug dealers asked to stop being portrayed as villians in popular media we should acquiesce to them? Get a legal profession and then we will talk.

  84. Hey look! by Red+Samurai · · Score: 0

    It's a prostitute taking the moral high ground!

  85. HA! by Mike570 · · Score: 1

    Okay, this article made my day. We live in a strange world when hookers complain about their work environment. If they're so scared of violence, maybe they need to consider a new career. I'm told the unemployment office offers job training. The simple fact is hookers do what they do because they like making easy money and to them, making $30,000 a year is a fate worse than death. If you don't want to work like the rest of us, then deal with the consequences of that decision. Besides, kids shouldn't be playing games that are rated mature, anyway.

  86. art? or life by dartarrow · · Score: 1

    They note that the games are a bad influence on children, and might encourage rape and violent behavior towards prostitutes in real life.

    This returns to the debate on whether life imitates art, or art imitates life.

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  87. errr? by eZtreme · · Score: 1

    so, lets get this straight: prostitution = illegal gta = legal so something illegal is trying to ban something legal something is wrong with this....

  88. Can't...stop... by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 0

    Sperm!

  89. Fighting Arm-in-Arm. by triso · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson and prostitutes on the same side. The mind boggles.

  90. Leave the whores alone.... by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Run over the pimps instead. They are the true filth on the street.

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  91. Own Goal by sesshomaru · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To use a term from football or soccer as we call it in the states, this is an "own goal." To quote SWOP:

    Since the video game Grand Theft Auto accrues points to players for the depiction of the rape and murder of prostitutes, SWOP-USA calls on all parents and all gamers to boycott Grand Theft Auto.
    Now, I've only played Vice City but it seems to me that this does not resemble, at all, what happens in that game. If you want a health boost, you drive slowly around street walkers until one gets into your car. Then you drive to a secluded spot, and your health increases as your money goes down. Now, you can murder anyone, as far as I can tell, in Vice City. I can remember chaisawing cops and random people in a mall one night when I was bored. But rape? That doesn't happen, and most of the time randomly murdering anyone, including prostitutes, is a bad idea.

    The reason why so many people have a problem with GTA is because it treats sex with prostitutes as both no big deal and as generally beneficial. Which would tend to make people see it as something that shouldn't be illegal. Hence lies (about rape) and exaggerations (you get points for killing prostitutes, while killing a prostitute in GTA may be beneficial it also carries in game risks which may make it detrimental).

    But the goal of NIMF isn't, for example, to make prostitutes the one class of person in the game who are invulnerable, it is to remove them from the game completely. Removing the ability to portray prostitutes in a game removes the ability to portray them positively.

    This is actually very sad, because I imagine the guys at Rockstar North are in favor of decriminalization and also against the murder or maltreatment of prostitutes, so their opinion would be inline with SWOP-USA. (I come to this conclusion from the political content of the game, the hypocracy of right wing congressman Shrub and his mistress porn star Candy Suxxx for example.)

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  92. Dangerous argument by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The same applies to murder. It's just usually* called "justifiable homicide" or "capital punishment". ("Reasonable force" is one thing, but Virginia permits shooting someone in the back if they once posed a threat in the past and I think Texas now allows you to kill someone if there's any chance they could pose a threat in the future.)


    *This depends on the country and the context. Somalia has no Government to speak of and therefore nobody to define such terms. With assassination considered a legitimate tool in the war on terror, the boundaries are getting fuzzy even when stable political systems exist.


    Yes, this is relevant, as we are looking here at whether something is considered by a given country to be a serious crime or even a crime at all. If there are countries where prostitution is a serious crime and murder is acceptable, then do you look at their standards for so judging, or go by your own?


    I'm not condoning or condemning anything here, I'm merely pointing out that it's never been clear-cut. What is "serious" is simply too subjective and varies far too much between individuals, never mind countries.


    As far as sex workers are concerned, my only personal opinion is that there exists no way of identifying and assisting abuse victims who drift into the trade, those abused within it, modern slaves, anyone acting under duress for any other reason, etc. Nor is any serious effort made to deal with those involved in abuse, slavery, etc.


    Changing laws that are highly emotionally charged is difficult and likely to be infrequent. So it is vitally important that if/when they are changed, they are changed in a way that provides the greatest benefit for the longest time. I am not convinced that lobbyists are the best ones to explain benefits and I'm not convinced that anyone else has identified the risks - present or future.


    The status quo sucks (bad choice of words for this topic, but who cares?) but every alternative I've ever heard seems infinitely worse and far more prone to bring about the very problems that are supposed to be being cured, especially as the real problems seem to be largely being ignored.


    Deal with the serious stuff first and then worry about the details. Otherwise it is just vote-trawling and people-pleasing.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Dangerous argument by orzetto · · Score: 1
      I think Texas now allows you to kill someone if there's any chance they could pose a threat in the future.

      You mean Harry Whittington wanted to run for the republican primary in 2008?

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  93. Stage a Protest! by Mazda6s · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chant: "Hell no! We won't blow!" *Shamefully stolen from a co-worker*

  94. Inner city youth, blacks, chicanos should complain by javaxman · · Score: 1
    at least if you're talking about San Andreas... I mean, I love the game, but ddddaammn, the stereotypes are thick, the violence is right out there, and the portrayal of the city as decaying and decadent, and of people as not having much choice ( can I get a job in SA? Can I progress in the game without shooting someone? That's not the game, sorry... ), and of people being cruel and uncaring... it's not nice to *anyone* portrayed in the game. Ouch. I mean... looking for a good guy? Uh, I guess the game does have a 'hero', but he's not a good guy by any stretch, even if he does save the occasional girl.

    On the other hand, I'm not so sure it 'glorifies' gang culture as much as the critics claim. I've been playing it lately, and damn if you don't just get shot and killed *a lot*. It's a hard damn life, and in any sort of real life that would be no fun. There are personal relationships and such, but that's real... but nobody in the game is clean, or really moral, or just or right... those concepts don't exist in the game.

    Does playing the game make *me* want to hang out with someone who has automatic weapons ?!? Hell NO !! I see a Tec9, man, I'm *outa there*, ASAP !! Likewise, I'm not excited about going to a war zone after playing some WWII game, either. Some people are excited about going to war, and/or excited about gunning down people in the street... something tells me that these games don't really change that idea one way or another. What, you don't like the art that reflects a man's reality? Well, best start changing that reality, or making alternative art that expresses the reality you'd prefer...

  95. Criminals are not happy either. by blanks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gamespot has an article about an association of Criminals protesting the GTA games. Apparently, the Criminals of the Criminals Outreach Project aren't too happy about their ingame counterparts being treated violently in the GTA games. They note that the games are a bad influence on children, and might encourage rape and violent behavior towards Criminals in real life."

  96. Tell the truth...! by AdamTrace · · Score: 1

    The tagline from the article says:

    "Sex workers cry foul, say game 'accrues points to players for the depiction of rape and murder of prostitutes.'"

    Let's tell the truth, shall we?

    I just played all the way through GTA:SA, and I really enjoyed it. In my mind, I compared it to an R-rated movie (like, "Casino"), and that comparison seemed adequate.

    In the game, I hired a prostitute once or twice, but there's really not much reason to. I don't remember any mention of rape, or any option to rape. (Did I miss something? Was there a "rape" key somewhere?)

    I also don't remember getting any "points" for murdering innocent people. I guess I picked up their money, but it also is a pain 'cause the cops would come after me. I actually tried to AVOID killing people because of this.

    I'm not going to say that GTA is for everyone, or even that it's harmless. But until we can honestly discuss the game, without stretching the truth or outright lying, discussion is close to useless.

    Adam

    1. Re:Tell the truth...! by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      >I also don't remember getting any "points" for murdering innocent people. I guess I picked up their money, but it
      >also is a pain 'cause the cops would come after me. I actually tried to AVOID killing people because of this.

      Uhm, in GTA:SA you improve your "gangsta rating" or is it "Criminal Rating", I forget, anyway you improve it by killing people, you improve it even more by destroying aircraft and busting ballas.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  97. Buy more copies of GTA! by wshwe · · Score: 1

    Every time stories like this make the news I go out and buy more copies of GTA! :-)

  98. You Know You've Gone Too Far When. [nt] by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    IHNMTS

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  99. Won't somebody please think of the children! by Calyth · · Score: 1

    Quit using these "won't somebody please think of the children" excuses on games that are clearly marked Mature. If a parent is irresponsible enough to buy their 10 year old kids GTA or Soldier of Fortune, they'd have to deal with the consequences. All these parents and even prostitute groups needs to stop pushing the responsibility of the parents onto society or game developers that did mark their games according to the ESRB rules.

  100. Technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't a Christian unless you believe in everything people like Jack Thompson say.

    Just ask Jack Thompson about that.

  101. Yes, because before GTA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...nobody EVER thought of hiring a hooker and then beating/killeg her to get their money back afterwards.

  102. So now it's official. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has gone to shit. Lovely.

  103. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GTA sales are up by 400%. It turns out that the recent protests by Prostitutes Against GTA (or PAG, for short) attracted even more youngsters to buy game, when kids were interviewed at the game shop why they purchased the game the most common responce was- "When I heard about the protest I just felt like smackin'-a-ho and GTA was the easiest way for me to satisfy the impulse".

    News at eleven.

  104. some smells fishy... by llZENll · · Score: 1

    Will Jack Thompson ever give up?

  105. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha!.. Prostitutes have a say in anything.. They even have a union.. hehe.. What has the world become.

    We shall continue to fuck and bitch slap you in GTA, you nasty hoe.. hehe

  106. Sorry, bitches by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

    Bros before hos

  107. You're right, just like the movies by SauroNlord · · Score: 0

    You're right, just like the movies, literature and the internet media as a whole portry this. No reason to single out one form of communication/media vs. another.

  108. Plus, those $1000/hr call girls... by Corvaith · · Score: 1

    ...wouldn't exist if there wasn't a demand for them.

    The day men stop patronizing prostitutes, there will be no more prostitution. Not one day earlier.

  109. Who's going to complain next? Crack dealers? by skids · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Don't look for logic in this.

    The point these folks seem to be missing is that you can beat up any random pedestrian in GTA3SA. If you choose to do so to a prostitute, that came from you, not from the game -- it was your choice. (Well, they do have more cash to take, but so do drug dealers. Both tend to be armed, but the only one you're encouraged to wax are the crack dealers.)

  110. Yes by jd · · Score: 1
    Sometimes from those who control them, sometimes from their clients, sometimes from the authorities (cops who are bribed by pimps to beat up and return women who escape from slave operations, for example) and sometimes they themselves are the abusers and exploiters. (It's rarer, though it's not unknown. It's also much less discussed.)


    Society is one very ugly mess. GTA probably doesn't help, but all things considered, I can't see how - even if it did "encourage" vile behavior - the impact could be remotely significant.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  111. Cue spastic profanity. by Skudd · · Score: 1

    You have GOT to be fucking kidding me. There's an association for "Sex Workers", and they have the gumption to claim discrimination? What bullshit.

    I can understand racial discrimination, and the likes, and how associations may be formed to counter their effects, but this is absolutely fucking retarded. I have never in my life seen such an absolutely stupid idea, let alone a reality.

    Prostitution is wrong on many many levels, including various areas (if not all) of law, religion, ethics, and culture. Having a skin color different than someone in country-x isn't a choice, but puting yourself out on the street corners to compete for the "business" of other hormonally-driven people is an abomination of humanity.

    If you disagree with me, fine. That's your choice. This is just my opinion and I needed to state it.

    On the topic of the game: What are we going to see next, little, purple-purse-carrying, old ladies suing Take Two/Rockstar for the violent portrayal of their death by Vercetti? What about us gearheads suing because we don't all use our shops as chop shops and whore houses?

    1. Re:Cue spastic profanity. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Prostitution is wrong on many many levels, including various areas (if not all) of law, religion, ethics, and culture.

      It is genearally illegal in the US. That has nothing whatsoever to do with right and wrong.
      Some religions don't like it, some do. Again, there is nothing in any way related to right or wrong.
      There is nothing whatsoever unethical in prostitution. Immoral? well, that depends entirely on *your* morals.
      Cultural?!? WTF? How could anything be "culturally wrong" unless you're in China or something?

      If you disagree with me, fine. That's your choice. This is just my opinion and I needed to state it.

      That's fine, but your "opinion" is absolutely wrong. Not morally wrong, but factually entirely incorrect.

      You have GOT to be fucking kidding me. There's an association for "Sex Workers", and they have the gumption to claim discrimination? What bullshit.

      Oh, I see. You think that you know what's right and anybody who disagrees is wrong and has no right to express their opinion.
      I hate to break it to you, but I'd say the average whore has better morals than you.

    2. Re:Cue spastic profanity. by Skudd · · Score: 1

      Okay, let me give you a little bit of advice: Never tell me my opinion is wrong. Opinions are not supposed to be classified as "right" or "wrong"; they're opinions and are to be classified as "opinionated".

      The fact that you just up and stated that my opinion ...is absolutely wrong. Not morally wrong, but factually entirely incorrect... makes me harbor much disrespect for you and will prevent me from responding any further to any content authored by you.

      I am open to anyone disagreeing with my opinion, but I will not tolerate anyone flat out stating that my opinion is wrong.

      You think that you know what's right and anybody who disagrees is wrong and has no right to express their opinion.

      [sarcasam]Thanks for making an assumption about me. I really appreciate it.[/sarcasam] I welcome anyone to disagree or challenge my opinion, or likewise state their own. However, I reiterate that I will not tolerate my opinion being labeled as wrong.

      And in regards to my original post, I still stand by what I said. It is my opinion - my belief - and I maintain it: Prostitution is wrong.

    3. Re:Cue spastic profanity. by Darby · · Score: 1


      Okay, let me give you a little bit of advice: Never tell me my opinion is wrong. Opinions are not supposed to be classified as "right" or "wrong"; they're opinions and are to be classified as "opinionated".


      So if I hold the opinion that the earth is flat then it's not wrong?!?
      Wow, you're way out there.

      The fact that you just up and stated that my opinion ...is absolutely wrong. Not morally wrong, but factually entirely incorrect... makes me harbor much disrespect for you and will prevent me from responding any further to any content authored by you.

      That's too bad. Perhaps in the future you should state your opinions as such rather than claiming that your opinions are what counts for legality, ethics, culture and the rest of the tripe you spouted. Your opinions are *only* applicable to you. That means when you state them as applying to the whole world, you are wrong. Absolutely and totally.


      [sarcasam]Thanks for making an assumption about me. I really appreciate it.[/sarcasam] I welcome anyone to disagree or challenge my opinion, or likewise state their own. However, I reiterate that I will not tolerate my opinion being labeled as wrong.


      I made no assumptions about you whatsoever. You stated that directly. That is the problem with "opinions" that are statements of your morality applied to other people who are not you.

      And in regards to my original post, I still stand by what I said. It is my opinion - my belief - and I maintain it: Prostitution is wrong.

      That I have no problem with. That is an opinion. What you did before was claim that *your* baseless opinion was somehow the *one* in line with culture, ethics and the rest which is clearly nonsense.

  112. The work provided by...... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    ...... Sex Workers Outreach Project USA is made possible by a grant from Jack Thompson and by right wing nutjobs everywhere.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  113. How about a trade-in program? by realmolo · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, like "guns for toys"?

    Except it will be "GTA for BJs".

  114. Prostitutes.... not a lower form of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good on them. I agree with another poster that said this is the most logical argument that could be made against GTA.

    As for the others, well I couldn't resist. How is consentual sex between two adults bad exactly? Oh and while we're on it, how exactly are prosititutes lower forms of life than others? They're just people like the rest of us who've chosen a particular profession.

    C'mon people grow up.

    1. Re:Prostitutes.... not a lower form of life by cnerd2025 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're just people like the rest of us who've chosen a particular profession.

      It is even more sobering to consider that many prostitutes are simply trying to pay the bills and have no way out. Many prostitutes, if not all, don't like their "service", but they do it because it's a way to make money.

  115. Well what do you know... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    It looks like Congress isn't the only group of whores who has a problem with GTA...

  116. Re:Prostitue Rape Victims by mpathetiq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm guessing very. What happens when a boxer gets attacked?

  117. Re:Prostitue Rape Victims by plate+of+felt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    extremely. non-consentual is still non-consentual.

  118. a sane voice! by plate+of+felt · · Score: 1

    thank you!

  119. Headline incorrect by JoshRazz · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you actually look at the SWOP website (http://www.swop-usa.org/ they're not calling for a ban or any kind of censorship. They're calling for people to vote with their dollars. That's a principled stand, given that they're not pro-censorship otherwise.

  120. No one should think of sex? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1
    After all, [sex is] yucky. And nobody should ever think of it. EVER.

    You think that's the prevailing attitude in this country? Holy crap, man. They practically put sex on cereal boxes.

  121. You've got bigger problems by artoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've got bigger problems than worrying about legalities if the woman you're having sex with is an ACTOR in your film...unless of course your film is "Best of Both Worlds".

  122. Re:Prostitue Rape Victims by drsquare · · Score: 0

    I suppose it would be like shoplifting. They'd be more pissed off about not getting the money.

    Mind you anyone who rapes a prostitute is just being cheap. Is £10 really worth prison?

  123. This is obviously a guy's forum. by this1kid · · Score: 1

    I'm really rather shocked by the level of a lot of jokes on this forum. A lot of what's been said are really disrespectful and misinformed. Granted, there are ladies who get into prostitution on their own accord, but there is a vast majority who didn't, and even those who first consented end up wanting out. It's a difficult business to get out of, due to its physical / psychological effects. These women face a heckuva lot of hostility, danger, and emotional damage every single day from the clients and pimps they have to interact with. But I'm going to withhold further outburst of pissed-offery, since I'm realizing thatthis is something that very few guys will ever be able to relate to, to the chagrin of the women in this world who have to cater to the men's damn demand.

    1. Re:This is obviously a guy's forum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well hey, THEY choose to sell their body for money :/

  124. Thought you might like to see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sort of thing that passes for 'research' amongst the 'woman's rights' fraternity (ha ha).

    These gems culled from the reference given in the earlier post ( http://www.prostitutionresearch.com/faq/000010.htm l )

    "Real sexual relationships are not hard to find. There are plenty of adults of both sexes who are willing to have sex if someone treats them well, and asks."

    "Necrophilic child molesters enjoy the knowledge that, when the molesters are finished with them, the children's lives will never be the same."

  125. And let's not forget... by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And let's not forget that:

    - when a hooker's boss (err, pimp) just wants to ride someone's butt to vent frustration or boredom, chances are he won't have the stamina to ride for hours. IT bosses can keep at it 8 hours in a row (preferrably starting in the afternoon)

    - a hooker's client probably knows already what he wants or can make up his mind in a reasonable time. I don't expect anyone spent _months_ discussing whether he wants a blow-job or sex, or called a year worth of meetings to decide if he wants to be on top or underneath, just to avoid the responsibility of making a decision. (In a project I've been in, a PHB needed a year to decide whether he wants his reports printed landscape or portrait by default, and wouldn't accept the program until it printed by default in his orientation-of-the-day. In a program which let him do both already, _and_ came with a report editor so he could rearrange them as he flippin' sees fit anyway.)

    - the hooker doesn't have to spend a lot of time in team-building/motivational/etc meetings (if you're a manager, don't kid yourself: you probably don't have the charisma for this. Boring 20 people to death with platitudes copied from a book does _not_ make them feel more motivated. Verbal masturbation about how great a leader you are, even less so, and it probably means you aren't), status report meetings, meetings where the boss is just bored and wants to talk about his vacation, and responsibility-avoiding meetings which are there only so we all talked about it (and had our feedback ignored) so noone is personally responsible for the decision... or lack thereof

    - the hooker doesn't have to be diplomatic about it when someone tries to score some free sex (a la the "hey, can you come over and fix my computer/network/printer/etc for free?" in IT). Everyone can understand that a hooker does it for money, and won't turn deeply hurt and hostile when she does ask for money. But as an IT geek everyone assumes that by definition you have no life and would probably just sit there bored, staring at the walls, if people didn't call you to give you a virused computer to work on

    - ditto when someone tries to get a free change-request disguised as "uh, I may have asked for a hand-job, and paid for a hand-job, but what I had in mind was really a blow-job. So now it's your fault for not giving me what I wanted, and you must give it to me for free." (I'm sure you had an idiot client like that by now if you're a programmer.)

    - ditto when someone thinks he's so smart if he asks for "just a demo", and then tries to squeeze the final product functionality into the demo to avoid paying. I'm sure if you tried telling a hooker that you just want to see her naked to know what you're paying for, and then tried to change that little by little into being free sex, you'd get laughed at and told to fork over the cash.

    - As a hooker you're paid if you do more work in a day, and noone will act as if it's your sacred duty to work an extra 4 to 8 hours a day for free, just to show loyalty and commitment to the company

    - For that matter, as a hooker it's clear who brings in more money and who hasn't done any work in 3 years straight (cue the "you IT guys just cost us money" or "bah, we did just as well back in the days of typewriters and filing cabinets" comments, or Wally people making a living just with show-business for the boss's benefit, but with exactly zero job-related skill or productivity)

    Etc.

    All in all, I suspect the hooker has the more dignified job.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  126. Pedestrians Call for a Ban on GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next we'll see this: "Gamespot has an article about an association of pedestrians protesting the GTA games. Apparently, the foot workers of the Foot Workers Outreach Project aren't too happy about their ingame counterparts being treated violently in the GTA games. They note that the games are a bad influence on children, and might encourage criminal and violent behavior towards pedestrians in real life."

  127. Write that up NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seriously. Turn that into a decent game plan and document some moves. Then start pitching it.


    That games worth $50 of my money no problem!

  128. So! by Jessrond · · Score: 1

    This means that most children are now expected to visit prostitues at some point in their lives?

  129. Re:Prostitue Rape Victims by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they would just laugh it off. After all, prostitutes are made of string aren't they?

    Rape isn't about the sex, it's a physical and mental assault. Of course it's going to be traumatic and if you have to even ask that question then you've a pretty fucked-up view of people.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  130. Help I'm too dumb to survive by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    You would think that it's common sense not to rape and murder people, but apparently some people are just too dumb to realise that. If it's OK in GTA, it must be OK in real life, right?

    Actually, in GTA, the cops come after you, and rather than arresting you just open fire.

    It seems like anyone who would normally be too dumb to survive in normal circumstances now just has to find someone to sue. Oh, you mean I shouldn't have stuck this tooth pick in my eye? What do you mean it could be sharp!?!

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  131. In Soul Reaver..... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You go around, as the angle of death, wiping out communities of humans and vampires alike.

    An evil god raises you from the dead to wipe the earth clean. Does this teach children something they shouldn't be learning?

    Or in other news, movies about drug dealing often glorify (and rightly so) the lives of drug dealers, because they often have exciting lives. Does this teach children something they shouldn't be learning?

    Even worse, watching politicians on TV lie about corruption, sex, drugs, drinking and influence teaches children how to use a silver tongue. Does this teach them something they shouldn't be learning?

    Lack of information, lack of exposure, lack of knowledge never saved anyone. Ignorance is never bliss; and the only way you can confront hatred, violence, and deception is head on. "Saving" your children from these things only ensures that when they encounter them in 'the real world' they'll get hoodwinked, abused, or assaulted. Better to teach them, than to let them learn themselves.

    This doesn't necessarily mean you should hand your kids GTA and tell 'em to go at it. But perhaps you should sit down and play it with them(assuming they have reached the age of reason (determining this is left as an exercise to the reader)), and stress that its a fun game, but its _fantasy_, and _dark_ fantasy at that. Parenting 101.

    *shrug*. Or maybe your supposed to keep your kids in a pink room till they reached the age of 18, and then let them into the world, with no knowledge at all, with the sound assurance that all your prayer from 0-18 will encourage God to watch over them in their ignorance.....

    *shrug*.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:In Soul Reaver..... by anaesthetica · · Score: 1
      You go around, as the angle of death, wiping out communities of humans and vampires alike.

      What acute little premise for a game.

    2. Re:In Soul Reaver..... by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh god to much :P

        *Angle* *Acute*

          Though maybe im just a bit Obtuse :D

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    3. Re:In Soul Reaver..... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      *giggle*...

      Funny funny :)

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  132. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FSM in god mode?

  133. ...or get bitch-slapped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor taste, I know, but funny.

    In Real Life, good on 'em. Nice to see them bucking a stereotype.

  134. Doomsday, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The day has come when hookers object to entertainment, on ethical basis...

    Is anyone else hiding in their home-made shelter saying their prayers, or is it just me?

  135. Re:Inner city youth, blacks, chicanos should compl by ultranova · · Score: 1

    at least if you're talking about San Andreas...

    From the article you linked to: "I don't care what any criminologist or psychologist says". That sums it up nicely, and that this comment came from a police detective that works with kids who are in danger of becoming gang members does explain why gang membership is on the rise, now doesn't it ?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  136. Whe we asked the Ho's, "why are you doing this?" by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    One of the prostitutes said:

    "Well, we are already used to fucking people for money, so we asked ourselves why not companies? I mean if an old fart can do it, who could be better than us?"

    btw.
    Do they realize prostitution is illegal, violence in "M" rated videogames is not?

    Im just waiting for the headline "Mobsters, gangsta's and carjackers sue GTA makers for portraying them in a wrongful way"

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  137. The provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I am sure the phrase is familiar to some of you...) all the same, you know something is wrong with the universe when a hooker cries immorality...in short, the only reason why their pissed is because they aren't makin any money off this deal. Shit, they should be enjoying new stigmatism attached to their "profession"...fuk it, they should have their OWN game, I can see it now. QUESTJOHN 2, or EVERJOHN, or maybe even CITY OF JOHN's, no? o well...how about...JOHN THEFT AUTO!! Like you could get rep for picking pockets and running up credit cards;D

  138. God bless america by hrrY · · Score: 1

    being an american I naturally and intuitively love sex and violence, GTA or not, that's what I subscribe to and attach meaning(s) to event of either(i.e I get laid for a reason, I kicked his ass for a reason). This country has fostered my perspective to the meanings I attach to these events, because usually after all the bad guys are dead, the good guy's get laid, or at least have a better chance of getting laid. It is this same, very simple, fundamental idea of reward and punishment that has carried this country through a shit load of wars most of which we have arguably won and branded us with an image that the world is envious of(or used to be...)This game embodies the basic principles that most of us practice in our day to day lives. When we nullify something that is bad on our live's, we seek to be rewarded. When we we nullify something that is bad in someone else's life we seek to be rewarded. These ideas can be applied to every spectrum(school, work, personal, hooker, etc.)

  139. Read carefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says that they want to BOYCOTT , not ban. There's a difference.

  140. You sound just like Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus enjoyed hanging out with whores - at least they were honest.

    He protested and spoke out against the priests of his day,
    who did nothing to help anyone.
    In the end it was religious nut cases that got Jesus killed.

    Moral: Jesus says, 'Hang with hookers, avoid church on Sundays!'

  141. born in a cave by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    I didn't know tht we let truck drivers post here

  142. Re:Inner city youth, blacks, chicanos should compl by javaxman · · Score: 1
    From the article you linked to: "I don't care what any criminologist or psychologist says". That sums it up nicely, and that this comment came from a police detective that works with kids who are in danger of becoming gang members does explain why gang membership is on the rise, now doesn't it ?

    That is pretty damn funny, or maybe sad/funny, I'd kinda missed that...

    yea, I really think that I'd try to turn it around and use it as an educational tool of sorts... "oh, you like that game? Well... notice what happens to you when this is the guy you are. You get shot at. Your friends and family get shot and killed. You end up shot, dead, or busted. It's fun as a video game, perhaps... because you get to go back to your save game like 5000 times so you can actually finish the game. Sadly, *you* only get to die once, and when you're busted you're not on the street the next day. Maybe you just want to keep that kind of experience in-game, and keep yourself and your family as safe as possible outside the game, huh?"... and then take the real-life examples that a person in that positon would know about and use them to contrast and compare the game to reality. I'd think doing something like that would be a lot more powerful, and connect with the kids a lot better than just dismissing the game outright.

    Sometimes it's nice when something is 'just a game'. It'd be nice if violence was limited to games, really... I mean, that's what video games are *great* for : doing stuff that you'd *never* do in real life.

  143. Re:Inner city youth, blacks, chicanos should compl by ultranova · · Score: 1

    yea, I really think that I'd try to turn it around and use it as an educational tool of sorts... "oh, you like that game? Well... notice what happens to you when this is the guy you are. You get shot at. Your friends and family get shot and killed.

    He did use it as an "educational" tool. He made people play it, and then, if they killed cops or did some other crime (in Grand Theft Auto), he would question them about it afterwards.

    I don't know - feels kinda slimy, setting people up like that...

    Maybe you just want to keep that kind of experience in-game, and keep yourself and your family as safe as possible outside the game, huh?"

    From what I've understood, being safe is the one of the major reasons for joining gangs. It's nice to have someone to watch your back.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  144. Re:Inner city youth, blacks, chicanos should compl by javaxman · · Score: 1
    From what I've understood, being safe is the one of the major reasons for joining gangs. It's nice to have someone to watch your back.

    Too true... though I guess you have to question, does it work ? Does it work in the long run ? Or does it make you even more of a target? Who does the gang protect you from... itself? Other gangs? Cops? Simple, lone bullies? Or would you rather be running with the pack than be *gasp* 'alone'?

    Really, joining a gang turns out to be like joining any group- most folks do it to be part of the group, to be closer to some people they like and have similar interests with, because they lack any other stronger connection to people... it's just hard when you like being a tough guy, and someone keeps pushin' on what you have to do to be tough to the point of 'you want to be one of us? go knock over this store or wack this guy, then we'll think about it'... that's when you have a real decision to make.

    If you don't mind doing others harm, you've already made that decision, though... but unless you're under the age of 12, I think you're likely to have a pretty good idea of the difference between doing harm to a real person and doing harm to a computer generated image of a person. Of course, it could turn out that I'm wrong about that, but despite the Nut Cases out there, I don't think we've really seen the crime wave you'd expect to be associated with the popularity of the GTA games... the Nut Cases would be nut cases with or without violent video games...

    Funny, these things don't seem to have simple answers. I know, let's just blame the video games and ban *them* ! That's simple!

  145. Late on the uptake? by Krush3r · · Score: 1

    Um, ok. They wait 5 years to start protesting?

  146. Re:Prostitue Rape Victims by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Rape != Sex. If you had any experience with either, you'd know that.

  147. Why are THEY complaining? by PC-PHIX · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Sex workers cry foul, say game "accrues points to players for the depiction of rape and murder of prostitutes."

    Actually, as far as I know, you can NEVER rape prostitutes in the game - they approach you and get paid for their time and in fact, GTA San Andreas features missions where you have to SAVE them from violent, non-paying customers. If they think that either of these scenarios is upsetting, they are just complaining about their chosen career.

    As for murder... well it's not targetted at prostitutes - it's anyone and everyone! So either the entire human race should hate these games or we should recognise each for what it is: a game; fiction based on some of the worst aspects of modern life (crime), and a satire of certain lifestyles in certain parts of the western world.

    They are also NOT for kids and have been rated as such. Go to talk to the parents who keep giving GTA to minors.

    --
    Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
  148. Dear Virgin ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have been reading slashdot for a long time now, and this topic made me make an account. So here is my virginity comment.
    Dear Virgin,
    1. You don't have to have an account to post here.
    2. Slashdot does not censor words, so you can use "bitch" and "fuck", rather than "bi*ch" and "fu*k".
    3. The word "I", when referring to a person (as opposed to the Roman Numeral "1"), is always capitalized in English, and the word "its", when it means "it is" (as it does after the word "bitch" in your post), should always be spelled "it's".
      Also, sentences end with periods/full stops.
      (I am not going to try to correct "thos is ORG", because I don't even know what you were trying to type.)
    4. The "Code" setting on the Comment Posting page is for code, not prose.
      If you are posting plain old text (or even text that contains HTML, and you want newlines automatically turned into <br>s), then you should use the "Plain Old Text" setting.
      Using "Code" to post prose is annoying to most people.
  149. Re: A game? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

    but Beyond Good & Evil was a really good game. :)

    Nietzsche made a game too?
    The old chap never ceases to surprise me..

  150. Re: A game? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    At least Ubisoft used "&" instead of "and", so it wasn't a total ripoff. :)