Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Launches the Zune

Doug-W writes to mention an Engadget post about Microsoft's launch of the Zune. From the article: "Not a lot of surprises in the specs department, but they've confirmed the basics we've known for a while, like WiFi, 30GB of HDD, built-in FM, a 3-inch screen and the basic music, pictures and video playback. They also finally let slip the screen res -- an unsurprising QVGA -- and some better news on the codec front: the Zune supports h.264, MP3, AAC and WMA. As for ballyhoo, wireless Zune-to-Zune sharing is where the real action is at, and it works pretty much like we've been hearing: you can share a full-length track with a friend, and they've got three times to listen to it over a three day period, after which they can flag the song for purchase on the Zune Marketplace -- unless they're an unlimited 'Zune Pass' subscriber, of course."

472 comments

  1. Let me be the first to say... by cp.tar · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... who cares?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by rwven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Me...for one. I think it's pretty sweet.

      One thing that we're all still wondering is how will people control the thing? I haven't seen one explanation for how the center "wheel" (if that's what it is) works. I think we'd all like to see a screenshot of the menu/control systems...

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by notneverwired · · Score: 1

      Amen!

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by badasscat · · Score: 3, Informative

      One thing that we're all still wondering is how will people control the thing? I haven't seen one explanation for how the center "wheel" (if that's what it is) works.

      I think it was confirmed a while back (via an FCC filing or something) that it's not actually a wheel, just four buttons arranged to look like a wheel. The clickwheel without the wheel part.

      Makes sense, as Apple does have a patent on the clickwheel design, and I was wondering how MS was going to get around it when I saw this. Simple enough; the wheel is not a wheel.

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      "Simple enough; the wheel is not a wheel."

      How intuitive, then, that it looks like a wheel. Typical Microsoft industrial design.

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know. i'm so sick of hearing about these overpriced, DRM-crippled apple^H^H^H^H^H microsoft products

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by gaveawaymyname · · Score: 1

      I don't. But I hope this guy does.

      Let me know when someone launches the Zune into the ground.

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Arwing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, just like the tabs they call 'Ribbens' in Office 2007

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by vought · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Makes sense, as Apple does have a patent on the clickwheel design, and I was wondering how MS was going to get around it when I saw this. Simple enough; the wheel is not a wheel.

      You know what else Apple has? Something I haven't seen mentioned in the first 120 comments on this post?

      The Dock connector.

      Apple's trump card, the 30-pin dock connector and it's communications scheme is par of their defense against other players stealing marketshare.

      Want to plug your iPod into your new car? Next model year (which starts, ah in a few weeks), you'll be be able to buy a car from any of roughly 3/4 of the world's automakers that has a built-in iPod dock. The offerings this year aren't bad, either.

      I see the requisite oval connector shape on the Zune (since they just couldn't stop at copying Apple's buttons and wheel look), but it's unclear what kind of dock connector they're using. If Apple has an exclusive deal with AMP, you can pretty much write the Zune off (as well as for other reasons, like the "what were they thinking?" color choices of white, black...and brown).

      So, to sum up:
      Apple has convinced everyone and their brother to put a dock connector in cars, boomboxes, camera connectors, etc. ad infinitum.

      Zune does not have a dock connector, and can't use any iPod accessories, including those that come with a "Steering" wheel.

    9. Re:Let me be the first to say... by johneee · · Score: 1

      I thought that too, and I wondered if there was a way (ignoring for the moment whether there was a desire on anyone's part) to make some kind of adaptor connector that would go between Zune and an iPod dock connector.

      What would be really really cool from the user's perspective would be a standard connector and communications protocol so we'd have a choice what player to use.

      I wonder how it feels to Microsoft to be on the other side of the vendor lock-in game?

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    10. Re:Let me be the first to say... by rwven · · Score: 1

      It would likely be POSSIBLE (with enough tinkering), but such things require permission and a license to create from apple. That's something you can bet on never seeing.

    11. Re:Let me be the first to say... by saleenS281 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, if MS had that you'd be screaming anti-competitive practice...

    12. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You know what else Apple has? Something I haven't seen mentioned in the first 120 comments on this post?
      The Dock connector.


      That's funny, I have the older iPod with the firewire connection, and I look down at the newer models because of the connector.

      I think the firewire solution is simple and elegant, the dock seems like an extra I don't need.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:Let me be the first to say... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah, there may be some of that sneaky code protected by the DMCA involved? i know some of the after market adapter boxes that make your car's head unit basically think it is talking to a CD changer will display info like track name. i would assume there is some licensing deal going on there? if that is the case, then i guess Apple might just deny the license to somebody making a Zune-iPod adapter plug. who knows.

      i read somewhere today that Microsoft claims it will take the Zune 5 years to catch on. i could be a dick and point out that the iPod's 5 year birthday is not for another month (i had to look this up). who knows what the ipod will be like in 5 years, if it even still exists. when you consider 5 years of advancements JUST in terms of data storage and battery size/life.... yikes.

    14. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      I see the requisite oval connector shape on the Zune (since they just couldn't stop at copying Apple's buttons and wheel look), but it's unclear what kind of dock connector they're using. If Apple has an exclusive deal with AMP, you can pretty much write the Zune off

      What's AMP? Googled it but no luck.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    15. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Klaruz · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're trying too hard: http://www.amp.com/

      They make all kinds of connectors. There's a good chance you have a large number of them in your office or living room and don't even know it.

    16. Re:Let me be the first to say... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Trouble is, firewire only works with a system with a firewire port and an iPod thick enough to hold a firewire port. You couldn't have a nano with a firewire connection. My iPod connects to firewire or USB.

      The dock connector is universal amongst all models, you get a universal dock and an adaptor to make it fit your model perfectly. You can't do this with a firewire.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    17. Re:Let me be the first to say... by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      AMP is a massive electrical connector company owned by Tyco. http://www.amp.com/

    18. Re:Let me be the first to say... by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, if MS had that you'd be screaming anti-competitive practice...

      Give me a break. There is a huge difference between coming out with a proprietary technology that SOLVES A PROBLEM and being able to successfully promote it vs. calling OEMs on the phone and saying "Ship Netscape and Die".

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    19. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CODiNE · · Score: 1
      I see the requisite oval connector shape on the Zune (since they just couldn't stop at copying Apple's buttons and wheel look), but it's unclear what kind of dock connector they're using. If Apple has an exclusive deal with AMP, you can pretty much write the Zune off.

      Well now that people have so kindly pointed out to me which AMP you're talking about... I should probably point to this Apple Tyco link I found. Apple and Tyco share board members. So the odds are fairly high that Tyco/AMP are going to go along with Apple's wishes as regards the dock connector.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    20. Re:Let me be the first to say... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      Funny, here I thought MS solved that whole compatibility problem the myriad of Unixes had created at the time. I could've sworn it was a cost effective alternative that allowed the entire PC market to flourish by having compatibility across the board. Now you might say that it was a proprietary solution so it's bad, but I guess you just said that was OK didn't you...

    21. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why couldn't they use a USB connector? That's what my Zen Micro uses. There's no reason for the iPod to require a proprietary connector when standards such as USB exist.

    22. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Dix_sw · · Score: 1

      The clickwheel without the wheel part.

      "There is no wheel"

      Seriously, though, the iPod's wheel is one of the most confortable and intuitive controls I've ever used, specially for movile devices. One would think Microsoft would have tried to do something about that. I mean, they have the money and the resources. Or, at least, a tactile screen that's confortable to use. Then they'd have a chance for an iPod Killer.

      --
      "So, once you know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means."
    23. Re:Let me be the first to say... by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Right on parent poster! Apple isn't saying that in order to make "Made for iPod" devices Garmin/Bose/Whomever cannot make a "Zune for S..ure" accessory too.

      In the end, Apple could have gone with the USB hunk but since a full size USB is larger than a Nano and a mini USB port doesn't carry power (I could be wrong here) I don't see how that would have worked out.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    24. Re:Let me be the first to say... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Funny, here I thought MS solved that whole compatibility problem the myriad of Unixes had created at the time.

      Then you thought wrong. Neither DOS nor Windows was an "answer" to Unix. Unix was not a serious consideration for use on a personal computer circa 1980. The major competitor to DOS was CP/M which was standardized on personal computers at the time. Windows was just a knock off of the Mac. Microsoft didn't start really competing with Unix until the late 90s.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  2. so, since it supports mp3.... by yagu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mentioned is mp3 support for the new Zune... which brings to mind a question, what is an assumption about mp3 support? This is related to a recent "panic" when I found the version of Winamp I was ripping from only allowed me to create VBR mp3s, and I was not sure if my player supported VBR. Nowhere on the web could I find mention it supported anything other than simply "mp3", though it is a very new machine.

    Short of ripping some tracks and transferring to give a listen I had no idea. Thankfully, my player does support mp3 VBR, though I've yet to confirm the rest of the players in the household also do.

    The reason I ask, I've come to the conclusion unless something is explicitly stated , you cannot make any assumptions about functionality, or even "accessories" for that matter.

    Consider, the player I have, which I absolutely love, so much so, I bought another for our daughter. Interestingly and to our surprise, the exact same player came in a smaller box. I figured better packing. Hmmmm, nope. The unit now comes without the AC adaptor for recharging. You can only charge the new units with the power from the USB connection unless you order the AC charger as an extra.

    I know this wanders a bit off topic, but, I just wonder how many others have experienced the assumed, e.g., "VBR" compatibility for an mp3 device to find it can't paly VBR.

    That aside, gotta love some of the comments on the article page -- e.g., one complains about Apple needing to also get a wide screen for their device... funny, I guess "wide screen" can be a fairly relative description.

    1. Re:so, since it supports mp3.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      I have never ever ran into a MP3 player except very old ones that do NOT support VBR MP3's. My 1st Gen Shuffle supports them just fine. Even higher bit rate stuff works on it ok.

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:so, since it supports mp3.... by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

      VBR came about a lot later in the mp3 game. OGG, of course, supports it natively (not sure if you can even disabled it). If you have a really old player (as in, serial-port), you'll probably just get gibberish or it will choke on the headers.

      Now, why we are still discussing "mp3" is a huge flame for another thread.

    3. Re:so, since it supports mp3.... by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Every mp3 player i owned supported VBR. From $30 complact flash player i bought 4 years ago(thank you fatwallet), to my ipod nano, and lastly my recent purchase of $20 phillips boombox(thank you slick deals), they all supported VBR. My $20 phillips even supports Mp4 though no fairplay support(blame apple).

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    4. Re:so, since it supports mp3.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So.. is bold the new _underscore_ when it comes to proving_your_point_?

    5. Re:so, since it supports mp3.... by commonchaos · · Score: 1

      Even the Rio PMP300 supported VBR... the bitrate display just went nuts...

  3. WideScreen by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    The widescreen stuff looks kind cool!

    1. Re:WideScreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      that looks familiar

    2. Re:WideScreen by sith · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not widescreen. It's the exact same resolution as the iPod with video - 4:3, QVGA (320x240). They've just turned the screen sideways and made it 3" diag instead of 2.5".

    3. Re:WideScreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's widescreen for a device like this. What do you expect? It's not some TV.

    4. Re:WideScreen by Jfarro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Something wierd I found out when doing digital video work...widescreen has nothing to do with resolution, it has to do with pixel aspect ratio. quoting side and top screen sizes can tell you if something is widescreen. Resolution and diagonal size cannot.

      Digital video off of DV cams on SD res comes in at 720 x 480, no matter if you turn on the widescreen mode or not. The widescreen mode changes the pixel aspect ratio to 1:1.2 which is what we see in video as "widescreen".

      All that being said, if widescreen on computers is so widely misunderstood, what good would having a widescreen device be if noone understands how to properly make media for it?

    5. Re:WideScreen by hexix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, a widescreen would be.... wide.

      This is the same 4:3 aspect ratio that the iPod has. What exactly about it is widescreen to you?

    6. Re:WideScreen by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      You understand that this is because analog television doesn't actually have a fixed "width" size, right? It has a fixed number of scanlines (vertical resolution) which allows for players to output video with non-square pixels. On a fixed resolution screen with square (or roughly square) pixels, like an LCD, yes you can tell the aspect from the resolution.

      I'm sure you'll see what I'm talking about when you've had some more experience with it.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  4. is it enough? by legoburner · · Score: 1

    Although it sounds good, do people hate microsoft so much (thanks to windows) that it will not be a success compared to the more-respected apple? Or will ipod fatigue set in as people look for the next big thing, giving a decent boost to sales? Microsoft have always been fairly decent with hardware manufacturing (original xbox appearance and controller aside), and I would not be averse to getting a zune over an ipod.

    1. Re:is it enough? by NineNine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although it sounds good, do people hate microsoft so much (thanks to windows) that it will not be a success compared to the more-respected apple?

      I think that your assumptions are a bit off. I don't know any non-geeks who could care less about Microsoft. Besides, why would they hate Windows? Windows 2000/XP is cheap, easy to use, and works.

      That point aside, I'll be buying one because I don't want to give Apple one red cent, and I've been waiting for a good one to come out.

    2. Re:is it enough? by iroll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can something that is functionally equivalent to an iPod be, in any way, the "next big thing?"

      And no, I don't consider zune's wireless sharing to be even the "next little thing." It's like trying to take on Kimberly Clark (maker of Kleenax) by selling your own brand of facial tissue. Sure, you can make money, you might even take some of their market share, but you will never be Kleenax. You have to find a new niche if you want to be the next big thing.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    3. Re:is it enough? by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Although it sounds good, do people hate microsoft so much (thanks to windows) that it will not be
      > a success compared to the more-respected apple?

      I'm still waiting for a portable player that meets my, admittedly demandinging, feature checklist. Doesn't look like Zune is in the running.

      1. Must be able to run Rockbox. No vendor, especially Microsoft, is going to release a perfected firmware first try or even tenth try, and will move on to the next product long before the bugs are squashed and certainly before I am ready to buy a new unit. At least with something like Rockbox I could fix a really annoying bug myself if all else failed.

      2. Must be able to support a wide range of codecs I am interested in and am able to rip to. MP3 is of course a given, but FLAC is important to me, especially on a HDD based player. OGG would be nice, but wouldn't be a deal breaker. I understand why many don't do it, nobody is doing it in a DSP yet so software only playback eats CPU and battery. AAC and WMA can exist, although I won't be using either of them. Video on a 2-3 inch screen is of zero interest for me, but if it doesn't bloat the physical size or kill battery life I'm neutral on it.

      3. Must have a user replacable battery. Period, full stop.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    4. Re:is it enough? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      I understand why many don't do it, nobody is doing it in a (hardware) DSP yet so software only playback eats CPU and battery.

      Somebody should mod that "interesting". I've been wondering for years why there aren't any hardware players that support Flac or OGG.

    5. Re:is it enough? by apeeira · · Score: 1

      Amen!!!

      Although I own an iPod , I'm FED UP with apple's arrogance and elitism towards 'non creative, non original, PC' people!!!! (not that microsoft is the best example of corporate humility, but compared to apple....)
      I would want this to be a sucess, at least to put the pressure on apple.

    6. Re:is it enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be from Mars. All your sentences are lies, probably even the last one.

    7. Re:is it enough? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I'd wait to see how it pans out before buying. First off, what kind of battery life is this going to have? With wi-fi and everything, I can't see how it'll be very good at all.

      Second, what about the accessories? Right now, my iPod can be fully controlled from my Pioneer car stereo through their interface (and it charges the iPod for you too). Think they'll offer the same for Zune players? What about all the other iPod-related devices that have cropped up like clock radios with iPod docks, voice recorder add-ons, and digital camera storage adapters?

    8. Re:is it enough? by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I can name plenty of non-geeks that hate Microsoft.
      Things they bring to my attention:

      Windows ME
      Viruses and spyware pre-2004

      They are stuck using MS because of proprietary 3rd party software.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    9. Re:is it enough? by Moofie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because there are only four people who care?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:is it enough? by Josh+Coalson · · Score: 5, Informative
      Somebody should mod that "interesting". I've been wondering for years why there aren't any hardware players that support Flac or OGG.

      Who told you that? There are plenty:

      FLAC players

      Vorbis players

    11. Re:is it enough? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Okay, somebody should mod *you* interesting too ;-)

    12. Re:is it enough? by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Theese people knocked the snot out of Kleenax.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    13. Re:is it enough? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2

      And no, I don't consider zune's wireless sharing to be even the "next little thing." It's like trying to take on Kimberly Clark (maker of Kleenax) by selling your own brand of facial tissue. Sure, you can make money, you might even take some of their market share, but you will never be Kleenax. You have to find a new niche if you want to be the next big thing.

      I'd say wireless sharing is much more of a big thing than any other development in mp3 players in the last 5 years, if done right. You know damn well that if Apple does it, people will be going nuts around here.

      Caveat: the "play it 3 times" thing isn't the right way.

    14. Re:is it enough? by saleenS281 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "People" don't hate Microsoft, geek's do. Plenty of geek's hate apple too... I for one can tell you I'm sick of their BS itunes and DRM. And I can also tell you they were an immediate turnoff after the first 3 ipods I purchased all died within 2 weeks (1G ipods).

      Contrary to popular belief, most of the working world loves Microsoft. Windows has been stable since 2k was released. Outlook and Office have always gotten the job done except in the most obscure cases. You're definitely viewing the world through rose-colored glasses, most people have no animosity whatsoever towards MS. They just know they make "teh windows".

    15. Re:is it enough? by iroll · · Score: 1

      Damn my west-coast accent and phonetic spelling.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    16. Re:is it enough? by Pope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FLAC playback is unnecessary when you can just convert to WAV or AIFF. Amusing that it's a requirement of yours, since nothing eats the battery more than constant HD access, which your giant FLAC files will do.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    17. Re:is it enough? by doughrama · · Score: 1

      I gotta agree. I think wireless sharing is a pretty cool idea. Like you said, if done right it could be a big deal.

      The way Microsoft implemented it does sucks.

    18. Re:is it enough? by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      Nobody is asking the important question. What color are the earbuds?

    19. Re:is it enough? by Moofie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Earwax colored.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    20. Re:is it enough? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      That's a strange statement, please qualify that. Does Apple only market to BA graduates and arts majors? Does it mandate you know iMovie before you can navigate the web browser? Does the machine lock up if it finds out you like Word more than iPhoto?

    21. Re:is it enough? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. While not sure on the rules of implementation, the idea is great. Trying to work out how it's 'functionally equivalent' to my Nano...

    22. Re:is it enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giant flac files? Flac is encoded in such a way that all the compression and optimization goes into creating the optimized flac file. When you play back flac files, it doesn't have to do nearly as much work to convert the compressed stream as it does with other codecs; hell, it even uses less power and energy than playing back and mp3 file. And battery life? My X5L, which right now ONLY has flac files on it, lasts about 43 hours on a charge playing music.

    23. Re:is it enough? by iroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I did say functionally equivalent EXCEPT for the wifi, which I think is no more of a deal-maker than the FM tuner.

      Only time will tell if the wifi is a real deal-maker or a lame non-starter. It's kinda like the FM tuner; not enough people want, need, or use it to make it a deal-maker in a fight between iPod and knockoffs. And, if the wifi is unusably lame or unnecessary, then yes, Zune WILL be functionally equivalent to your Nano, at least for the average buyer. It's the average buyer that makes a company top dog, not a fraction of a niche market.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    24. Re:is it enough? by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You do realize that FLAC is lossless and not uncompressed, right? So that maybe people want FLAC support so they can store more music on their portable player? Even a 60GB player will only fit around 12 albums uncompressed. In FLAC that number at least doubles.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    25. Re:is it enough? by nek · · Score: 1

      Your math is a wee bit screwy. 60GB = 61,440MB. An uncompressed CD is about 780MB. 60GB will hold about 78 uncompressed albums. So FLAC or even Apple Lossless would make that nearly 160 albums. Just a friendly FYI.

    26. Re:is it enough? by apeeira · · Score: 1

      Does Microsoft tie their OS to an expensive and (for some) unafordable computer? What I'm talking about is a media perception. Creative vs Non Creative persons. are you more creative or Cool or Hip because you use all incarnations of Apple products? Don't mix market and strategic activities with the perception a corporation wants everybody to have to their products. Now if we were about to talk of ethics that would be another thing. Nobody forces you to use IE or Word or any other MS product BUT if the industry uses it then you simply have to. Where I live the de facto OS and platform for publishing and that stuff is mac. Now by the common logic of MS force use to use XYZ product, Apple is forcing the industry here to use it. Why? It is a good product? Maybe maybe not but good or bad it fullfills a certain necesity. Why does the same logic apply to MS products? It is after all a piece of software and not our modus vivendi. But by the ads of apple in tv....

  5. How will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the brown Zune look with the blue screen of death?

    1. Re:How will... by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Like a shit with a Canadian $5 bill smushed in the middle. Appropriate.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:How will... by dgb2n · · Score: 1

      Microsoft heard that Brown was the "New Black"

      Fashion jokes are never funny on Slashdot....

    3. Re:How will... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Shitier than it already does.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:How will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is original and hilarious.

    5. Re:How will... by Mex · · Score: 1

      You know, this Blue Screen of Death joke... How about we try retiring it, I'd say it's time. I haven't seen a blue screen in years.

      We need new jokes :(

    6. Re:How will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will look like...

      the Ubuntu desktop while browsing the MSDN website!

    7. Re:How will... by tooth · · Score: 1

      haha, that joke never gets old!

    8. Re:How will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d00d. i just saw one last month when my parents' computer died--what r u talking 'bout.

  6. Reality of "wireless sharing" by Cybert4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's a hint on all these ad-hoc wireless networks. We also have another ad-hoc wireless network. We call it air, and it can transmit vibrations from one person to another! Seriously, I've had my DS for awhile, and I've never suddenly found a person to play wireless with. Unless you have bells and whistles going off to indicate another person is around (and I'm not going to sit around at a "looking for" screen), it's a solitary thing.

    And slapping on the usual DRM shackles won't change this. Most likely, make it much worse and harder to stick to the general public.

    1. Re:Reality of "wireless sharing" by bunions · · Score: 1

      > We call it air, and it can transmit vibrations from one person to another!

      There's a lot of people in my office for whom a Zune would serve as a welcome replacement for this kind of behavior. From my POV, anyway.

      "HEY, STEVE, YOU SEE THE GAME LAST NIGHT?!?"

      "HELL YEAH, DID YOU SEE THAT TIME WHEN..."

      "AW HELL YEAH, THAT WAS SICK!"

      ok you can shut up now plz.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    2. Re:Reality of "wireless sharing" by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      My hopes for wireless could begin to be met with this but the real cool stuff probably won't happen until WiMax is widespread and available on one of these.

      My hopes are that you can bounce around and whenever you are in a hotspot (getting pretty common) you have access to online streaming music. There is no shortage of online services offering personalized radio station type functionality, having this available on a portable while around town sounds great to me. Don't need to download everything just have it stream to me. So I'm in the coffee shop or the mall and pickup a hotspot where I can tune to my station.

      With WiMax support this would obviously expand the possiblities greatly. Why pay for XM radio when you can have customized content streamed to your car?

      The "killer" aspect of the Zune I'm actually mostly hoping for is for it to also be a portable media center. The have a really nice easy interface to XP/Vista media center so I can just load a few of my recorded shows on it to watch on the train. Just load my own DVR'd version of the Colbert Report instead of having to pay ITunes for it! ;-)

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    3. Re:Reality of "wireless sharing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy wifi sharing isn't really for "random encounters" (except under rare circumstances), it's for friends.

      Maybe you don't have friends so you don't see the utility...

    4. Re:Reality of "wireless sharing" by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint to the DS buyer waiting to find a friend to play with: Music is much more universal than a gameboy will ever be. People have been trading music since they could record it. I don't know about you, but as a teenager and as an adult, my major source of new music comes from friends. We share music with each other all the time. You know, go outside, get in the car and go to a friends house to visit. Maybe have a beer and listen to a CD or two. If this thing didn't have the 3 song limit, everyone would have one. The problem here is that the technology is being pushed by Microsoft. It's OK though. Other companies will come along with similar devices and hopefully the technology will evolve into something better. Transmitting a file wirelessly isn't voodoo.

    5. Re:Reality of "wireless sharing" by dootbran · · Score: 1

      Why would he need to borrow songs from a friend's Zune? Wouldn't he just rip the CD, or listen to it on their Zune?

      This is a worthless feature, anyone you know would be able to accommodate you sampling some tracks easier and no one is going to sacrifice battery life so a stranger can sample their music.

    6. Re:Reality of "wireless sharing" by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      The feature is only worthless because it is crippled. Why rip a CD when it is so much quicker/easier to transfer a file digitally via WiFi? Why should I be confined to listening to music on my friends player? What if I want to hear it at home?
      br. It's a great (and obvious) idea. Just a very bad implementation.

  7. Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job, Zonk! You made it through an article about an MP3 player without having to use the phrase "iPod Killer" even once! See how easy that was?

    *pats Zonk on the head*

    Now if only you could do that for the 500 other articles you edit with "iPod Killer" in them ...

  8. The Name by buddhaunderthetree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me or is Zune a terrible name?

    --
    "Technology.....the knack of so arranging the world that we don't have to experience it." Max Firsch
    1. Re:The Name by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I was going to post something about feeling stupid buying something named "Zune".

      Hello sir, can you direct me to your Zunes?

    2. Re:The Name by darth_pepsi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes yes it is. If you say it in french it's close to a slang that means penis in Quebec.

      Suce ma zoune = suck my ....

      You get the idea

    3. Re:The Name by Known+Nutter · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I, for one, welcome our new Zune Directing Overlords!

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:The Name by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Sounds better than "iPod" to me...

    5. Re:The Name by famikon · · Score: 1

      give it up.... please. (no one hands out 'funny' points for overlord jokes anymore)

    6. Re:The Name by meanween · · Score: 1

      It's better than Nintendo's "Wii" Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

      --
      http://www.guster.net : Mmmmm fresh Guster.
    7. Re:The Name by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh sure, just because your neighbours and friends aren't mysteriously being "transformed" in those alien "ipods" doesn't mean it hasn't happened to all of us.

      Just ask Len Nimoy

      Ipod is just as weird a name as zune.

      now an iRiver, that makes perfectly good sense for a music player name (what?!?).

      What I'd really like to know is this:

      Is microsoft losing money on each of these (think xbox)?

      I could fully see getting one and never buying a single piece of music (online).

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    8. Re:The Name by netwiz · · Score: 1

      yes, but "weeeeeeeeee" conjures gonads and strife, and there's always room for gonads and strife.

    9. Re:The Name by nocaster · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or is Zune a terrible name? About as stupid as live.com is for a search engine.

    10. Re:The Name by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      well, its better than something arbitrarily stupid like "i-pod". At least it rhymes with "tune".

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    11. Re:The Name by Shemmie · · Score: 1

      Zune envy?

      "Hey baby, mine's a 30 gig whopper"

    12. Re:The Name by eljasbo · · Score: 1

      Knowing it was made by a company named MicroSoft makes that fact much funnier than it otherwise would be.

    13. Re:The Name by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Because Google, Yahoo and Alta Vista made perfect sense... or something.

    14. Re:The Name by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

      would an ePod be a better name because you stick in your ear not your eye.

    15. Re:The Name by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      All they need now is their UI software called "iZunes" (I wonder if it works with Macs)

  9. Brown? by tinrobot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I guess it's for all those Microsoft customers who wear brown suits and brown shoes.

    1. Re:Brown? by pesc · · Score: 1

      I guess it's for all those Microsoft customers who wear brown suits and brown shoes.

      Yes, I can see it now

      --

      )9TSS
  10. This will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, how stupid do they think people are? They really are the RIAA's bitch, that 3 days of being able to share a song is crap. Do they know people have been sharing music before their fucking Zune without drm, and people have bought what their friend have?

    Sorry, I don't see anyone that downloads mp3s from filesharing being able to afford a Zune (or iPod), so why are they so intent on making sure your friend has to buy it? Right I forgot, this is the RIAA's device, not Microsofts or the customers. They still don't get that people want the music for themselves, not "permission to use it on one machine" ect. I give this a big itsatrap and call stupidity. And oh ya, no thanks DRM.

    1. Re:This will fail by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1, Troll

      Just like the ipod was a complete and utter failure because it has DRM.

    2. Re:This will fail by GandhiArnold · · Score: 0

      yeah ya know, cuz selling over 60 million units and having insane market share = failing

    3. Re:This will fail by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      I sense that sarcasm is lost upon you my child...

  11. Competition by EMeta · · Score: 1

    Not that Apples keep trying to innovate, but hurrah for what may be some real competition. Mostly, yay for letting me listen to non-podcasted NPR, as long as its reception turns out okay.

    1. Re:Competition by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

      Why listen to anything non-podcasted, if it comes in a podcasted form? Until they figure out some way to fast forward past the crap I don't want to hear about on radio, I'll be listening to podcasts exclusively.

      As an aside, does anyone else find it tedious when NPR does a bit on modern dance, say, (or some other inherently visual medium) and they try to describe it with a little soundtrack of people flopping around in a dance studio? Somehow, this just leaves me cold. With podcasts, I jsut FF past it.

    2. Re:Competition by phorest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The radio reception is usually horrible on anything that relies on using the headphone wires as an antenna. Unless you have an incredibly powerful signal I wouldn't bank on it.

      If they can solve the reception issues with a sensitive receiver then the radio aspect should be a winner. Probably won't be much different than my iRiver H340 reception. I wish them luck, they'll need it.

      I'm skepticle that even with their big name, big money and improved features they are way too late to the market.

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    3. Re:Competition by phorest · · Score: 1

      NPR has such limited podcasts to maintain the financial ability of their affiliate terrestrial radio stations. So you can get headlines and specials, but not their general content. Just today I was browsing their podcasts and wanted to see if Fresh Air was available... nope.

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    4. Re:Competition by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Can you purchase a 'season subscription' to NPR to receive all their shows as podcasts? Now that would be sweet. Something like $40 for an entire year's worth.

    5. Re:Competition by phorest · · Score: 1

      I don't know, though I would gladly pay a monthly fee to be able to acquire them as podcasts. Even if it was available from a form of local affiliate donation perhaps.

      Sure I could setup a radio and then time-record>convert>upload with cool2000 (via script)

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    6. Re:Competition by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Fresh Air is available through subscription on Audible.com

    7. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why listen to anything non-podcasted, if it comes in a podcasted form?

      If it's a call-in show, you might want to call and participate in the discussion from time to time. I listen to Penn Jillette's podcast on a daily basis, but there are times when I wish I could have called in (or emailed during the show) to share my thoughts. I'm always about 24 hours behind, so obviously that's never possible.

  12. Why medium-res? by Megajim · · Score: 1

    I would expect h.264-compatibility to be coupled with something better than QVGA. Maybe it's a price-point thing. Or perhaps this is the "core" system.

  13. Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by payndz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brown? Seriously? It's meant to be a cutting-edge, fetishistic techno-gadget, and they offer it in fucking brown?

    Steve Jobs: "Here's our new iPod Nano! It's available in black, white, silver and shiny green and pink!"
    Steve Ballmer: "Oh yeah? Well, here's Zune! It's available in black, white and this stylish turd-brown!"
    Steve Jobs: "Brown, huh? You got it in beige as well? Or tweed? How about a nice Argyle pattern?"
    Steve Ballmer: "Fuck YOOOOOUUUU!" [throws chair]

    Good ol' MS. Always as stylish and tasteful as ever.

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Bentov · · Score: 1

      Maybe they figure it works for UPS it will work for them also...

    2. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      You ever seen one of those Tivoli things? Some people seem to be into sort-of-but-not-really-retro colors and styling, so maybe the brown one is supposed to appeal to them (personally, I'm waiting for hickory - I'd overclock the sucker, and then even my pockets would taste good!).

    3. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by iroll · · Score: 3, Informative

      From this CBS article:

      Brown? Microsoft's design director for the project, Chris Stephenson, explained the shape and scheme is "to make it less cool and sleek, but actually warm and silky."

      "Who in their right mind would ... create a brown technology product? Artists will. Musicians would. And Zune will," Stephenson said.

      Emphasis mine, but I think he hit it on the head.
       
      /actually, I could see getting a brown & wood grain iPod, maybe done to look like some classy vintage audio equipment... but not a Zune, sorry.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    4. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Well, you gotta understand something... many, MANY people buy an iPod specifically for the *bling* factor. Meaning, these are mindless consumer whores who just want something to show off. A bright green or pink iPod is fucking ugly. I really don't need (or want) to tell the entire world that I'm smart enough to hand a clerk a credit card in order to acquire my new gadget. I just want to use the fucking thing. I could care less what color it comes in, and will probably get the brown, if I have a choice.

    5. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by gilbert64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The color is the best thing slashdotters can come up with when they try to flame MS and everything they due/make? That must mean Zune is REALLY good.

    6. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 0, Troll

      How's that contrarianism working out for you?

    7. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      It it was actual real leather. Hell yea, of course this is just brown shiney plastic (shiney brown....) and the animal freaks would scream if it was. Oh well.

    8. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by alcmaeon · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I hear the word "Brown," I always think of two things: Cleveland and shit. OK, I guess that was just one thing, but you get the point.

    9. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warm and silky? More like ugly and shitty to me.

    10. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by aleksiel · · Score: 1

      seems like they were going for colors that match things. marketing it as an accessory. zune that matches your shoes. neon pink won't be coordinatible with your outfit.

    11. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Troll

      How's that buttplug working out for you?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    12. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleveland Steamer ?

    13. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the brown one looks awesome, and surprisingly the style of the device in general is nice. Earth tones for electronics are definitely making a comeback. Sony has a whole new line of earth-tone styled electronics.

      Calling this typical Microsoft and co. bad style is ridiculous. I expected it to be silver, have too many decorative lines, and prominent blue LEDs. But this thing actually looks pretty good.

    14. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by fitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      Brown color is the highly touted "Theft prevention mechanism". After all, who is going to steal a *brown* one (assuming someone would buy a brown one... maybe they'll buy it just because it won't get stolen and it'll be the most popular model! 3. PROFIT!)

    15. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they make one big enough for the goatse man.

    16. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Jokes aside, you got something against chocolate? Because that's what a lot of people think of when you tell them to think of something brown.

      And while neither an MS or Apple fan, I say, the more competition, the merrier! I look forward to better mp3 players in the future, although probably the one I get won't be from either MS or Apple. Why not? Besides them and Creative, you'll have two types: those producing junk to sell to folks who can't or don't want to pay so much for a Zune or an iPod, and those who are making mp3 players better than everybody so they can make more headway into the market. Shop at a site that has customer reviews and you'll easily be able to tell them apart.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    17. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I would get a blonde-woodgrain and metal iPod in a heartbeat. I don't have any reason to upgrade my current one (60gig video) but I would if I could get that.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    18. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      Will you ask the important question, what color are the earbuds?

    19. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Who in their right mind would ... create a brown technology product? Artists will. Musicians would. And Zune will,"

      'cause everyone creates brown products. I like the read the newspaper when I create mine.

    20. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      So given the choice between the identical product in an attractive color or an unattractive color, you'll buy the unattractive color? Maybe MS is on to something here... I hope this doesn't catch on with the car companies.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by antic · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Looks nice, and brown is an "in" colour. Certainly preferable to some of the garish Apple options. Remember the dalmatian and flower power iMacs? They were u.g.l.y.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    22. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0

      You've just given me a great idea for recasting apple's TV commercials

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    23. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      Warm and silky? I suppose a freshly laid coil is pretty warm and silky.

      Then they really enforce the whole "this came directly from someone's rectum" look with the slightly green tinge to the edges so that it looks like they ate a bad curry the night before.

    24. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Man I wish I had mod points. That's just what I needed to crack me up this evening.

    25. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about "you're doin' a great job, Brownie". Again, redundant.

    26. Re:Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? by superflippy · · Score: 1

      For the same reasons, would be nice if it came in gray - not silver, gray.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  14. Two things I care about with this by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... and neither are mentioned, as far as I can see:

    Price & battery-life

    Bit of a pity that:

    "The Zune-to-Zune sharing feature may not be available for all songs on your device, and works only between Zune devices within wireless range of each other. This feature allows recipients to play full-length sample tracks up to three times in three days. Recipients cannot resend music that they have received via the sharing feature." ... as well...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Two things I care about with this by theantipop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can bet if either the price or the battery life was anything spectacular they would've mentioned it. Personally, along with battery life I was looking for some dimensioning. I'm sure in the coming weeks we'll find out the rest of the story and become even more unimpressed than we are now.

    2. Re:Two things I care about with this by kosmosik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > ... and neither are mentioned, as far as I can see:
      > Price & battery-life

      Maybe because what you see are three photos of a *prototype* device that is not even in production and nobody knows when it will be? :) So these (what you look at) are more like *goals*, not the final effect. Effect which will constitute of the look (ok we see it), price (no mention), specs like battery life (no mention), ease of use (no mention - but I expect independent review for that, it has ipodish wheel for sure - but how does it work?), service around it (think ITMS for iPods). Etc.

      So these are really just few photos that say nothing.

      > Bit of a pity that:
      > "The Zune-to-Zune sharing feature may not be available for all
      > songs on your device, and works only between Zune devices within
      > wireless range of each other. This feature allows recipients to
      > play full-length sample tracks up to three times in three days.
      > Recipients cannot resend music that they have received via the
      > sharing feature." ... as well...

      Yeah. Great feature. :))) Share with crippled music...

      Also I am suspicious of this wifi stuff. I know wifi is right now quite complicated to use, and it uses lots of battery power (it was not designed especially for low power consumption). Also I wonder about how those devices will autoconfig to work ad-hoc flawlessly.

    3. Re:Two things I care about with this by wheatking · · Score: 1

      Isn't this sorta like zing (www.zing.net)? maybe they will sue MS or get bought by them.

    4. Re:Two things I care about with this by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Am I wrong to assume that the sharing feature only works with songs purchased from the iZune Music Store?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Two things I care about with this by joseprio · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ... and neither are mentioned, as far as I can see: Price & battery-life

      And what about size, specially the thickness? Well, just my opinion, but by the photos looks like they're trying to hide something: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/zune/ default.mspx

      Instead, check the iPod photos. Apple is always making sure to show how slim it is! http://www.apple.com/ipod/ipod.html

      Of course, to power the big screen and the wireless connection long enough, this device needs a big battery, so it highly probable that it will be thick and heavy... about the price, maybe they'll decide to loose money over it, like they did with the first Xbox. They'll wait and see how the people reacts to it, and then decide the pricing strategy.

    6. Re:Two things I care about with this by cabazorro · · Score: 1

      From the press release:

      "The idea is to legitimize peer-to-peer sharing in a healthy way that works for everybody," said J Allard, a Microsoft vice president in charge of the Zune product line."

      This is the kind of mentality that makes may recoil in my sleep.

      Somo moron in a suit trying to figure out how to "sell you" how many times you listen to a song or how many times you copy it. Or maybe sell you the tune and for premium services sell you the lyrics or some kind dload access like those damn ring-tones of a cell phone.

      I truly hope that J Allard and his whole operation flunks for the non-creative unimaginative garbage they are trying to shovel up the road.

      --
      - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  15. The imporant question at M$ by treak007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about the Zune is so revolutionary that it makes a person not want to buy an ipod or throw away their current mp3 player for the Zune.

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
    1. Re:The imporant question at M$ by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, there are people like myself that won't buy *anything* from Apple, and have been waiting for a good competitor. That, and the iPod is grossly overpriced. MS doesn't have a history of overpricing their consumer products, although Apple does. As long as it's reasonably priced, I'm getting one.

    2. Re:The imporant question at M$ by Duct+Tape+Jedi · · Score: 1
      MS doesn't have a history of overpricing their consumer products, although Apple does.
      I'm guessing you've never looked at the price tag for an off the shelf version of Windows or Office (I'm not talking about upgrades or student/teacher versions)
    3. Re:The imporant question at M$ by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Windows costs two hundred dollars. Office's price is in the hundreds range as well. I have a feeling that the Zune will barely cost less than the iPod, and there are already non-iPod players and there have been non-iPod players for a while.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:The imporant question at M$ by flooey · · Score: 5, Informative

      That, and the iPod is grossly overpriced. MS doesn't have a history of overpricing their consumer products, although Apple does. As long as it's reasonably priced, I'm getting one.

      The rumored price is $300 for the 30 GB version. The 30 GB iPod is $250. So, pretty much, same pricing strategy.

    5. Re:The imporant question at M$ by aesiamun · · Score: 3, Informative

      MS doesn't have a history of overpricing their consumer products, although Apple does

      *stiffles giggling* you mean like the $300 upgrade price for Vista Ultimate? You mean $200 for a backlit keyboard and mouse? Yeah no overpricing whatsoever.

    6. Re:The imporant question at M$ by XPACT · · Score: 1

      One good reason would be having FM radio, which as far as I know the iPod lacks. I also have never owned anything from Apple.

    7. Re:The imporant question at M$ by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That, and the iPod is grossly overpriced. MS doesn't have a history of overpricing their consumer products, although Apple does. As long as it's reasonably priced, I'm getting one.

      The rumored price is $300 for the 30 GB version. The 30 GB iPod is $250. So, pretty much, same pricing strategy.

      Um...Office isn't over priced? Vista isn't over priced? $300 is 20% more than $250...that isn't overpriced?

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    8. Re:The imporant question at M$ by linguizic · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, the other rumor going around about it is that it smells like it looks.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    9. Re:The imporant question at M$ by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      people like myself that won't buy *anything* from Apple

      You sound like this guy.

    10. Re:The imporant question at M$ by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Apple offers a radio that is inline with the ear buds and does a nice job integrating. It also doubles as a remote adn is $29 add-on I believe. Check store.apple.com

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    11. Re:The imporant question at M$ by rthille · · Score: 1

      Why not? Anti-DRM? Price? Style? Hate Steve Job's haircut? They turn you down for a job?

      Inquiring minds want to know...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    12. Re:The imporant question at M$ by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Why not? Anti-DRM? Price? Style? Hate Steve Job's haircut? They turn you down for a job?

      He's probably still mad because they screwed him by canceling support for the Apple ][.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    13. Re:The imporant question at M$ by jimicus · · Score: 1

      That, and the iPod is grossly overpriced.

      Let's find out, shall we?

      The basic iPod (not nano/shuffle) has a 30G capacity, a colour screen and costs £219 from advancedmp3players.co.uk.

      A quick look around the same site shows the following alternatives with similar specs:

      Creative Zen Vision M 30G, colour screen: £209
      Archos 404 30G, colour screen: £219. (has a far bigger screen, but is slightly bulkier)
      iAudio X5, 30G, colour screen: £226. (supports Ogg and FLAC, but apart from a few geeks on slashdot, who in the real world cares?)

      Doesn't look hugely overpriced to me. Looks about right.

    14. Re:The imporant question at M$ by rthille · · Score: 1


      Hey _I'm_ still mad about that! :-)

      But I'm more pissed they didn't throw out more baby with the OS9 bathwater...resource forks need to die! Inconsistent text-box behavior is a bitch... etc. etc etc.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  16. Looks sweet by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

    It actually looks quite sexy. I wish the "sharing" aspect allowed for a longer period, such as a week, but I guess they figure most people woudn't buy alot of music if they could listen to it for that long.

    The key will be both battery life and ease of use, which it's going to have to meet or beat the ipod if they want any marketshare.

    1. Re:Looks sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It actually looks quite sexy.

      That's one way to admit that you've got a scat fetish.

    2. Re:Looks sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish the "sharing" aspect allowed for a longer period, such as a week, but I guess they figure most people woudn't buy alot of music if they could listen to it for that long.

      What you will really see is that people's fad attention spans will get even shorter. Listen to a hot song three times and it's yesterday's fad. *Next!*

  17. Is it really a launch?? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this really a launch? Can they be purchased today?? No? Then this isn't really a launch then is it? I can order a new Nano and it will be here in a few days to a day. Zune's probably ain't going ot show up until November.....

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Is it really a launch?? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we all know when Steve Jobs says, "And it's available... immediately", the reality is "it'll be on apple.com/store in five minutes, and the estimated shipping date when you order will be listed as 7 weeks from now"

    2. Re:Is it really a launch?? by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Or not...The 24" iMac is in Apple stores as well as the new nanos as of yesterday. I wasn't interested in checking out anything else but they were available to buy (nano purchased) not just a display a la the Dell Store.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  18. The BrownZuneFury writes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless. More space than an iPod. Awesome.

  19. Let me be the first to answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...the rest of the world that isn't so maliciously bent on overly criticizing every single idea that comes out of Redmond. The people who just care about the music and not all this bitter debate about who's "better" than who (as if the entire world are experts on quality).

    People who want to see something new, not (unlike a certain other company that made product announcements this week) the same old crap with more storage, a smoke-and-mirrors attempt at gapless playback, different colors (again), and an idea that's already been done for years, and a still-overly-restrictive DRM system.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to answer... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Troll

      Microsoft's main customer has always been the business. Individuals don't really care about Microsoft. They do care about Apple. Businesses are the other way around, but businesses have no reason to care about a music player.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Let me be the first to answer... by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I care about Microsoft and I'm not a business customer.. Especially since the Zune appears to be much closer to what I want than the iPod.

    3. Re:Let me be the first to answer... by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      My Rio Carbon (no longer sold) is an awesome audio player. The fact that I can drag and drop files from my desktop and use it as a portable drive is great- and the fact that it will look for audio files, and add them to the playlist is fantastic.

      No extra software necessary- it just plays the way I would want it to. Too bad Sony can't see this as an advantage.

      I do not want an iPod- I don't want the hassle. So I am looking for a good replacement for my Rio, because the battery is starting to fade.

      I too care about the Zune. I hope they have the drag and drop capability that the Rio has (had).

      --
      No reason to lie.
    4. Re:Let me be the first to answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Let me be the first to answer... by cbirkett · · Score: 1

      Gapless playback works perfectly on my old 30GB 5G with updated firmware.

      --
      "My fellow Americans, these are not the droids the nation is looking for."
  20. Brown! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The color of shit for a shitty product with a shitty name; all Microsoft's products should be brown.

    When will these zune things be in the bargin-bin so I can unshittify one by installing linux?

  21. Now Apple must play catch-up by socratic+method · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm an huge fan of Apple's products. I'm typing on a MacBook Pro and I love my 1G Nano. But after Apple's disappointing announcement this week, I have to say that Microsoft is now the technology leader in the portable player market.

    Ad-hoc wireless is a huge feature. The widescreen looks great. I have to admit that this Apple fan has, for the first time in years, a little bit of Microsoft envy.

    I know, I know. It is yet to be shown that the Zune + Windows delivers a great user experience like the iPod + Mac. iTunes and its store make the whole process seamless. The Airport Express and AirTunes are great features.

    But, like I said, while other /.ers put MS down today, I have to congratulate them. Nice design, nice features, great competition. Hopefully this will push Apple that much harder.

    1. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gg troll. ms leads the portable player market with exacly [b]zero[/b] players? ok lolz omfg wtf g2g cu.

    2. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by varmittang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to bust your bubble, but all MS has done is just regurgitated an portable player. The bigger screen is nice but it will also eat up your battery life too. Apple might have only given a little bit better screen with brightness and higher resolution, but at least they gave a much better battery life, both devices have yet to be tested in that area yet but we don't even know what the Zune can do yet.

      Ad-hoc wireless sounds nice, but I'm sure its going to have a major bug that everyone is going to exploit to either keep the music or its going to f up and people can't trade the songs. And its Windows only probably. So everyone that hates MS now and is looking to switch to something else are not going to buy this device. Plus its going to be XP or Vista only and cut out everyone that doesn't upgrade.

      This device even looks like the iPod large screen photo that came out like a year ago as a fake design, with the addition of the two buttons on either side of the click wheel. No very inventive there, plus the size of 30Gigs is just small, way to small.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    3. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this guy's comment flamebait?

    4. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be out of your freaking mind.

      Apple controls 80% of the portable media player market and has shipped over 60M devices while Microsoft hasn't even set a price for the Zune (their SECOND attempt after the failed PlaysForSure campaign) and you are saying they are the leaders in digital media?

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    5. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by bitme · · Score: 1

      Congratuale them on what releasing a bunch of photos. I have photos also of a flying car that I am going to be releasing this winter so please congratulate me as well. It doesn't work yet but the pictures show that is does so therefore it must work. Anyone can make claims of this or that and my bet is that just like Vista a whole lot of features won't be working when this is released or will be removed.

    6. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have photos also of a flying car that I am going to be releasing this winter so please congratulate me as well.

      I will, but only if it has the genuinely innovative property of being brown.
    7. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by drew · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that ad-hoc wireless idea is pretty neat. I'll bet there's a whole dozen people jumping up and down waiting to try it out. Color me underwhelmed. In every way.

      And seriously... Brown? They practically wrote Apple's next commercial for them.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    8. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by aj50 · · Score: 1

      He said technology leader, not market leader

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    9. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by stubear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Plus its going to be XP or Vista only and cut out everyone that doesn't upgrade."

      Yeah, unlike all those neat new iPod games and radio that work on my 4th gen photo iPod. oh, wait, Apple screwed people once again and decided that backwards compatibility wasn't going to sell more iPods. Seriously, a radio requires a 5h gen ipod? By the way, that's not a click-wheel, it's an 4-way rocker button which in my opinion is much better than the click wheel.

      By the way, how many people do you honestly believe are using Windows 95/98? How many of these people do you honestly think are the likely target audience for this device? Let me give you a hint, it's between 1 and -1.

    10. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by smileyj68 · · Score: 1

      Ad-hoc wireless for a device of this nature is interesting but has one major shortcoming - it is not a feature that encourages adoption.

      Think about it - in order for me to get any use out of an ad-hoc wireless music player so restricted the device needs to really be ubiquitous. I could care less than once every 3 months someone nearby can loan me the new Fergie single. And you can forget about accumulating music to sample quickly, I have no doubt the interface will (in MS fashion) have a plethora of confirmations and queries before you get the song. What if the person is walking away from you? Follow them till you get the whole song?

      What this brings to my mind is a thought of 'I don't want this feature unless everyone has this feature - so I won't purchase this product until it's everywhere.' And if I have this same thought and others do as well, it will never be everywhere. You cannot sell a product based on the promise of an experience you cannot reasonably expect to appear.

    11. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      I think the GP meant that they might use it to force Zune owners to upgrade to Vista (by releasing a new version of the Zune software that is Vista-only, then disabling some features in the older (XP) version, similar to how iTMS stops working in old versions of iTunes.)

      Or less heniously, they might make it Vista-only to begin with.

    12. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to defend Crapple, but come on. Does your iPod still do everything that was advertised when you bought it? Yes? Then what the fuck are you complaining about? They made a new product with added features. They're in the business of making money, not handing out free upgrades for life. Does Ford upgrade your '86 Escort with the latest features in the '06 Focus for free?

      Why do so many people feel entitled to a free upgrade just because they bought the previous version of a product? Gimme, gimme, gimme. That's right. Gimme a break.

    13. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Disappointing? New iTunes, new movies, new iPods, set-top box, and better song sharing, what disappointed you? No bluteooth earphones?

      The Zune is 4:3 ratio, 320x240, same as the iPod screen, which displays widescreen just fine.

    14. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He said technology leader, not market leader

      Right, but he said that without having used the Zune. I'm not sure if WiFi sharing feature will be cool, or completely lame - I haven't used it or seen it used. I'm very confused about many aspects of the Zune. For example, it doesn't work with Microsoft's Plays For Sure. Why not? Besides Fair Play, Plays For Sure is the 2nd most popular DRM music solution.

      Does it work with FairPlay? If not, and they are coming out with yet another format I'm just not sure that I'd be willing to take a gamble as to whether it would catch on.

      Someone mentioned that it supports some huge number of formats, but I can't find a list anywhere. What formats? Does it support Ogg Vorbis?? If it doesn't support Ogg, Fair Play, or Plays Fore Sure, then what am I going to put on it? MP3s? Every player does MP3. WMA? OK, most non-iPods do that, although I'm not totally sure where I get WMA files.

      Does it support IPod peripherals? If not, do they have any peripherals lined up for it? Will it work in my car? Can I get a boom box for it?

      I don't see how citing one feature iPod doesn't have which sounds like (admittedly without having used said feature) it would not be all that useful makes them a "technology leader".

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    15. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by stubear · · Score: 1

      They did not make a new product and add new features, they released an add-on for the 5th gen iPods that had absolutely no reason why it wouldn't work with 4th gen iPods. I'm not looking for a free upgrade, I'd be willing to pay a nominal fee to upgrade the iPod OS to handle games and the radio (if this is even necessary). I am not willing to scrap a working iPod and getting a 5th gen just to play radio and a couple games.

    16. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by admactanium · · Score: 1
      Think about it - in order for me to get any use out of an ad-hoc wireless music player so restricted the device needs to really be ubiquitous. I could care less than once every 3 months someone nearby can loan me the new Fergie single.
      exactly. i can see the microsoft folks sitting in a conference room wetting themselves over the abilit to share their drm-bought music between the 10 zunes in that room. however, it would takes YEARS for this feature to even be marginally interesting. you're not going to run into too many random people with zune's in any public setting for a long enough period to listen to that music. even if you did, it's socially awkward to glom onto someone's music library that you don't even know.

      if it was a friend of mine and we just happen to both have a zune, i'd be more likely to ask the person to borrow their cd or for them to just send me the mp3 files rather than "dj" it to me and have me run home to buy from a zune-store. it's a pretty cool feature on paper, but in reality it's nearly useless. if it costs the player in battery life, then it really doesn't do much good to a zune user.
    17. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      new iPods ... what disappointed you?

      You answered your own questions. The new iPods disappointed me:

      "We went from 60GB to 80GB!" Wow. Riveting.

      "We changed the form factor of the styling of the Nano to that of the Mini!" Gah. The Mini looks fucking horrid in comparison to the Nano. Now the Nano looks just as bad. "8GB Nano. But only if you like black." Not so bad. I don't mind black, though my Nano is white.

      Wow. Join the iPod revolution. Sure, Apple doesn't have to blow my mind every product iteration, but goddamn if some people don't just leap at the chance to lick Jobs' boots.

      Unless I'm wrong. Enlighten me as to how I should be excited by these?

    18. Re:Now Apple must play catch-up by cabazorro · · Score: 1

      A bigger brighter screen and wi-fi running is going to dry-up that
      battery before you can say "blueberry pie".
      Microsoft, as always, overlooks the KISS principle, which is Apple's trademark.
      Hey MS, why don't just go ahead a throw in a voice recorder, FM Tunner and
      an Organizer that synch with Outlook and downlaodable wallpapers $1.99 to personalize your Zune!?!!

      --
      - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  22. This ought to be good! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alright you simply have to explain this one.

    You'd rather give money to Microsoft over Apple.

    All of Slashdot is pulling up a chair, make it a good one!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the zune supports more file types than the ipod. 'nuff said.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    2. Re:This ought to be good! by everphilski · · Score: 1

      and a bigger screen... and you won't look like 90% of the yuppies out there.

    3. Re:This ought to be good! by tb3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You certainly won't! Especially if you buy a brown one!
      (Good manners prevents me from describing what you will look like.)

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:This ought to be good! by dmorelli · · Score: 1

      the zune supports more file types than the ipod

      mm, but not the most important one: ogg

      Me, I won't use anything from either of these companies. Never had an iPod, never will.

    5. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      this is exactly why i'd buy a zune over an ipod. people think buying an ipod makes them different because "apple thinks different". HA!

      sheep.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    6. Re:This ought to be good! by Moofie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bigger screen, with the same resolution, and available in shiny turd brown! WOO! I'll take two!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:This ought to be good! by famikon · · Score: 1

      iAudio FTW.

    8. Re:This ought to be good! by outZider · · Score: 1

      So, uh, WMA?

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    9. Re:This ought to be good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, bigger screen at same resolution is bad? Why didn't someone tell me!

      I'm sending my 57 Inch Projection TV back to the store and using my 27 Inch from now on. After all, they both run at the same resolution...

    10. Re:This ought to be good! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Didn't say it was bad. Didn't blow my skirt up, is all.

      And it's still turd brown.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:This ought to be good! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Ooh, WMA, like we even need support for that crap. The iPod supports all of the others mentioned.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    12. Re:This ought to be good! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on how closely you will watch it. If it looks pixelated, then your screen is too big for the resolution. I haven't seen a Zune, so I can't make the call - but I will say that smaller might just be better in a portable device. If you (like me) have a 15' living room, then buying a 57" TV does, would, in fact, make you a moron :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      just how old are you? i bet i'm not far behind.

      i know a lot of people who bought the ipod solely because it's apple and apple is cool and if you say otherwise, you're (as you said), an idiot.

      the zune has more features than the ipod already built into it. it's not the same thing everyone else has. it supports more formats than the ipod. it (according to a review i read last week) has a more intuitive interface than the ipod. sounds to me like the apple fanboys are just whining that microsoft did something right.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    14. Re:This ought to be good! by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      Insightful? This was one of the funniest things I've read on /. in a while.

    15. Re:This ought to be good! by shinma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never met anyone who thought that owning an iPod made them different, or bragged about their uniqueness because they had an iPod.

      I'd rather choose [insert object here] based on how well it performs the functions I require than whether or not "everyone else has one."

      It amazes me how image conscious geeks can be. A large subsection of geek culture will go to such extreme lengths just so that they can brag that they don't fit in. And then they complain because nobody understands them...

      It's ridiculous.

      --
      Shinma
    16. Re:This ought to be good! by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      If it plays VC-1, it's already better than iPod Video. Microsoft's implementation of VC-1 is very competitive with H.264, and you'll likely see an equal split between formats.

      (Amazon Unbox is probably the biggest distributor of VC-1 files so far)

    17. Re:This ought to be good! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Well, if nobody understands you already, why not go all the way and make it a concious lifestyle decision?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    18. Re:This ought to be good! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      the zune supports more file types than the ipod.

      What formats does it support? I looked in the Wikipedia article about the Zune and it doesn't list the formats. It DOES say that the Zune will not support Plays For Sure, but that it will support WMA.

      Does it support Ogg Vorbis?? That's the format I've seen everyone on Slashdot wishing for.

      I think the general public is going to be somewhat confused by the Zune. It doesn't support FairPlay or Plays For Sure (the two most widely used DRM formats). Does it support AAC? If it does, then people are going to be somewhat confused by the fact that the AAC files are supported, but oops some AAC files aren't supported because they don't support FairPlay.

      Then, there is the fact that the Zune won't support any iPod peripherals. Even if Zune is successful, it might take a long time for third party peripherals to be created for it. Maybe MS can talk some of the people who are selling iPod peripherals (boomboxes, etc.) to come out with versions for the Zune. Who knows?

      But, frankly, I'm a bit confused by the Zune. I think it will be hard for them to crack the market and beat Apple.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    19. Re:This ought to be good! by shinma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because, in many cases, it only serves to make your life less convenient.

      And I'm a goth, for crissakes, so I know all about people choosing to look/act different from mainstream society simply to be cool. But I'm also not a very good goth, because I don't stop liking bands after more than 12 people know who they are, and I know when to clean myself up and take my piercings out so that I can function in society with a job a bit more lucrative than working as a Hot Topic clerk.

      Here's my thing, in a nutshell. If product A does everything you need, and does it well, but is popular, why choose product B, which is inferior simply because it ISN'T popular?

      --
      Shinma
    20. Re:This ought to be good! by mr100percent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The iPod supports supports h.264, MPEG-4, MP3, AAC, WAV, and Apple Lossless
      Zune supports h.264, MP3, AAC and WMA

      Not mmuch "more" file types, and when did anyone like or use WMA?

    21. Re:This ought to be good! by doughrama · · Score: 1

      I never said that if you spoke poorly of Apple that you were an idiot. Trying to bolster your arguement my intentially mis-interpreting my comment is pretty shitty.

      My comment about idiocy had nothing to do with Apple. Rather it had all to do with your extremely shallow reasoning.

      There's nothing inherently wrong with liking the Zune. Having more features than an iPod is certianly a valid reason, supporting more formats is one too. A more intuitive interface is very subjective, if you prefer Zune's or iRiver's or whoever's interface better than the iPod, that's cool. Placing a high value on a consumer electronic purely because it's different, just because it's not X, is idiotic. Plain and simple.

      There is nothing cool about "trying" to be different. If you have to try, then you're still a sheep, you just run with a different flock.

    22. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      who's saying product B (the zune) is inferior? from everything i've read, it sounds pretty superior to me.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    23. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      it doesn't support fairplay because apple won't let anyone but apple support fairplay.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    24. Re:This ought to be good! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Since VC-1 (WMV3) is supported by MPlayer now, I don't care if it gets at least somewhat big. If only they'd use a real media container format (e.g. Matroska or QuickTime) instead of Microsoft's crappy ASF.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    25. Re:This ought to be good! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      it doesn't support fairplay because apple won't let anyone but apple support fairplay.

      Microsoft has a long history of getting Apple to do things they wouldn't otherwise do. They could just threaten to cancel Office for Mac again if Apple won't license FairPlay to them. It worked twice before.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    26. Re:This ought to be good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Apple never had the balls to cut off Office for Mac and I am pretty sure it will not the next time either.
      After all, Office for Mac is one of the 10 reasons they give to 'Switch'. lol, talk about the irony!

    27. Re:This ought to be good! by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      Same here. It's the first codec from MS that I actually like. I was very impressed with the downloads I bought from Amazon. Some looked better than DVD quality. I'm also glad they're using a standard that will be supported by other players.

      It's still true that iPod doesn't play them though, which was my point. Whether Zune does is unclear, although the article seemed to suggest it plays the rest of the WMV codecs, so you'd assume it might play VC-1.

      I should note that the ones from Amazon that I was impressed with were WMV9 Advanced Profile (fourcc WVC1), not WMV9 Main Profile (fourcc WMV3).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VC-1

    28. Re:This ought to be good! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Because of course Neon Greek, Neon Pink, and Neon Blue are the absolute epitome of chic and style...

    29. Re:This ought to be good! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      i know a lot of people who bought the ipod solely because it's apple and apple is cool and if you say otherwise, you're (as you said), an idiot.

      For evidence, grep 80%+ of the results from googling(tm) "+apple +ipod site:slashdot.org"

    30. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      for evidence of what?

      that slashdot likes to post stories about the ipod because a lot of people just have to freaking submit stupid stories about it? i mean at least 50% of those results were just pointless stuff.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    31. Re:This ought to be good! by JFlex · · Score: 1

      Microsoft never has and never will do anything right.

    32. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      they did something right considering their market share and what bill gates is worth.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    33. Re:This ought to be good! by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure most people buy ipod because it's what everyone they know has. The number of "think different" apple lusers out there with ipods is insignificant next to the number of non-mac users with one.

      And if you guys want a bigger screen, better features, and the best sound you can get in a portable audio player, why not go for the Cowon iAudio A2? Though I don't think it plays h.264 right now, but maybe in a future firmware upgrade.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    34. Re:This ought to be good! by shawngarringer · · Score: 1

      Because their site looks like shit, their media player looks like a tird, and what sort of name is the Cowon iAudio A2 ? Hey, dude, check out my Cowon, it's rockin!!!

      Seriously guys. Slow down on the flash. Make it wait for me. And please, only have one thing animated per page. I don't need your f'ing logo blinking all over the page.

    35. Re:This ought to be good! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Are you looking at the same website as I am? I don't see any blinking logos.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    36. Re:This ought to be good! by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1
      Alright you simply have to explain this one.
      You'd rather give money to Microsoft over Apple.
      All of Slashdot is pulling up a chair, make it a good one!

      I'll bite, just for the sake of conversation.
      A portion of the money given to MS eventually goes to Gates, which goes to philanthropy.
      A portion of the money given to Apple eventually goes to Jobs, none of which goes to philanthropy.
      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    37. Re:This ought to be good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I can replace the battery.

    38. Re:This ought to be good! by shinma · · Score: 1

      I counted at least 5. But then, I have Flash turned on.

      --
      Shinma
    39. Re:This ought to be good! by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      According to the article the only additional format of interest is WMA which is only relevant if you're already a Microsoft user. Since I'm not, it's not, so I'll stick with my iPod.

    40. Re:This ought to be good! by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Hooray! Mod parent up.

      All you ever get here is Microsoft is bad, Apple is bad, DRM is bad, Linux is the one true god, yadda yadda yadda... No one actually assesses anything logically...

      Everything is a compromise. I too am a goth. I have one 'additional' piercing, my nose, which is a compromise. It does cause comment although in my industry (embedded software development) I have no problem.

      I have a works laptop top. It is a Dell with XP and Ubuntu installed. The former because I have to work with other companies and so need to run standard apps (And no Open Office is not yet good enough. Try taking a document generated in word, amend it, and convert if back to word intact!). If I developed Windows code I'd only use XP but because I don't I have Ubuntu. I picked Ubuntu due to use friendliness. It's still not perfect but for most things I do not have to spend our configuring Linux just to get certain aspects of my laptop to work (although WiFi/WPA on Linux is still a crock of shit).

      I mainly use Apples. I have a G4 desktop and a 12" iBook because its small and unobtrusive and will fit in a back pack and leave room for other stuff. I used to use Macs years ago and when OS-X came out it gave me a *NIX like operating system but one which had been finished. When I was a professional academic I used IRIX (and do have an Indy at home) so I'm used to professional unixes. Linux is not a professional unix but OS-X as everything just works and that's not the case with Linux. I don't have time. I do have money so time is precious. I have one PC running XP and Ubuntu, mainly for work, but also for games playing. It hardly gets used.

      I bought myself a 60Gb iPod. I bought it as a media player and as a portable hard drive. I back up my source trees on to it when travelling. The video play back was a bonus that gets used on trans-atlantic flights. The new games facility is also a bonus for those train journeys I take. The Zune may be better. It may have more codecs, functionality etc. But I don't need the wi-fi since I have to plug the thing in to charge it anyway it can sync at the same time. I don't need WMA because I still buy my media on CD/DVD. I use iTunes to manage my media because it runs on both OS-X and Windows and because I find it useable.

      I work in the digital television industry. I'll tell you now that DRM is not going away. As I've said, everything is a compromise. Many here don't like DRM. If I could only play my purchased tracks on one machine I would agree. It would be great if I could play them on everything but that will never happen. The media companies would never allow it. So the choice is have some media available to actually download or no DRM. I would rather the former. So the next step, given there will be DRM (its a fact of life), is how restrictive should it be. For me the Apple one is fine (others may think differently). I can play my stuff on my Apple Desktop, my home PC, my works PC, my iPod, my housemates' machines via the network, and through to the front room via Airport express. It's not restrictive at all. No I can't give the tunes to my mates but I wouldn't anyway. I have many friends who in bands. Most are on independent labels. Even those who get in to the charts don't generally make enough to live on full time. Not everyone is a Robbie Williams. So I don't begrudge paying for CD's and would give music away because they need the money.

      So please people be individuals and assess this thing not because its Microsoft, or because its a competitor to Apple, or because it's the latest toy, or because it's cool to be different, but purely on its merits or otherwise...

      Brian - "You are all different!"
      Crowd - "We are all different!"
      Man - "I'm not!"

      I'm a goth, not because I want to be one of the Goth crowd, or because I want to be 'different', just because I want to be me. Be individuals...

    41. Re:This ought to be good! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      they did something right considering their market share

      Yes, they're extremely good at selling product.

      However, /. tends to be more interested in the technical merits than how good they are at selling product, and there they tend to fall down.

    42. Re:This ought to be good! by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I'm intrigued that it supports AAC. This is a good move by Microsoft and I hope other makers now follow suit. I've always thought that MS-oriented devices have been contractually scared away from supporting AAC, but maybe this marks a change in attitude.

      I have a large quantity of ripped songs in AAC format (chiefly because I'm too lazy to change my settings in iTunes). I don't have an iPod and I don't buy from the (ripoff) iTMS. So if devices began to appear that supported AAC, MP3 and WMA I would be all for them. These are for better or worse the major formats.

      Strangely enough I already own a device which plays all major formats and ATRAC3 too - the Sony PSP. But it makes for a bulky music player so I wouldn't carry it around for the sake of its music abilities. It's great for movies though - far better than any iPod.

    43. Re:This ought to be good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how old are you?

      praising a product you've obiously never ever used or have seen IRL

      who is the fanboy do you think?

      zune has more features?
      oh boy, that surely worked well for all the other 'iPod-killers'

    44. Re:This ought to be good! by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      microsoft is a bigger name than iriver or iaudio or creative. they have more money for marketing. i'm sure it will be at least an ipod killer killer. it won't take over the ipod, that was here first, but it will take a chunk out of it, especially from people who have yet to buy something. if i were to buy an mp3 player (which i probably won't), i'd get a zune over an ipod.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    45. Re:This ought to be good! by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Alot of companies have tried with high-end products like that, but none of them will ever take over any signifigant marketshare.

      For one, it's fucking expensive. $450 is alot, even if it has got nice features.
      For most people ease of use is more important than support for every format etc. The only reason I got an iPod as opposed to some other mp3 player is because I was so impressed with iTunes (have you tried out the new version 7? Awesome!)

      Sure, these things might be nice toys for those who like to play around with them, but they really need to be accessable for alot of people, and offer a new experience to fit in to the "digital lifestyle"

    46. Re:This ought to be good! by shinma · · Score: 1

      And if "the Zune has feature #17, which the iPod lacks" were the reason the poster I was responding to gave for getting a Zune, that would be great! Good for him. But it wasn't. His entire criteria for choosing the Zune was that it kept him from being one of the "sheep." And that kind of reactionary anti-image is just silly. Define yourself by what you are, not what you aren't.

      And as for the Zune being superior... I would say that all of the "extra" features the Zune has are more bloat than actually useful to me. WMA is the only extra filetype supported, which is less than useful. I can guarantee the only songs that will be shareable are the ones that are in WMA format that have been purchased from the Zune branded store. I don't listen to the radio, so an FM tuner is useless. And it's actually more expensive than the comparable iPod, so I have no incentive to pay extra for the features I won't use.

      On the other hand, the third-party iPod accessory market, from boomboxes and dj mixers to car inputs and memory card readers, trumps the Zune's FM tuner and extra format, and I don't foresee my friends and acquaintances picking up the Zune (much less purchasing enough songs from the store) to make the WiFi useful.

      But see, it might be different for you. When weighing the Zune's overall usefulness, I simply find it wanting.

      --
      Shinma
    47. Re:This ought to be good! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Which is all well and good, but not at all what we were talking about. I was suggesting it as an alternative to microsoft's zune thing that is a) better and b) not microsoft.

      For the record the A2 goes for about $315 (20GB) and $370 (30GB) and isn't even a comparable product to ipod, though Cowon does make ones that are. Also, itunes kind of blows.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    48. Re:This ought to be good! by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      About the price, my mistake. I looked at the price in european stores (I'm from europe) and automatically assumed it would be comparable in dollars like most products are. Anyway, here it costs 459 Euros for the 20 GB model, or about $580.

      From the way you worded your comment, I got the impression you were suggesting that all of the iPod users who "onlyhave them because everyone they know does" would be better served with a Cowon, as an alternative, and I simply gave my opinion on why it couldn't be overly successful.

      And if you can name any better music software that is as simple to use as iTunes, and let's you organize your collection easier and faster, I would like to hear it.

    49. Re:This ought to be good! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      I like Amarok a lot better than iTunes. You might be out of luck on windows and mac though. I don't know about macs, as far as what else is available (I'm assuming not much), but windows audio players have all seemed pretty limited since WinAMP stopped being enough like 6 years ago.

      Most people are probably are served well enough by iPods. But then again, most are probably fine with a lot of much cheaper players. If you aren't buying DRM'd music and don't care to have high quality audio there are a lot of players that will get the job done at half the price of an equivolent sized iPod. I mostly find it sad that people hold up iPod as some kind of gold standard in audio players when there are much better players in the same price range.

      I definitely wouldn't recommend that anyone buy an A2 for $600usd, that's insane. Are iPods in Europe priced more closely to those in the United States?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    50. Re:This ought to be good! by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Well I guess you're out of luck if you want to run iTunes (last time I checked it wasn't possible to run it on Wine). I haven't used Amarok too much though (although your argument does sound a little rich considering it is one of the most plain iTunes clones out there). What I'm saying though is that iTunes is basically on of the best media players ther is, and many people like the way it interacts seamlessly with their iPod. If you're counting the UI of an Audio Player, you do need to consider the software used to put music on the thing. It's part of the experience.

      Your argument about other players being cheaper isn't always true either. There might be some with a few extra features, like swappable SD cards. But if you want something comparable to say, a nano, with 2 GB of flash, a color screen, easy selection of titles etc, you're probably getting very close to $150 anway, if not paying even more.
      And I haven't checked prices recently, but I think iPods do pretty well on the GB/$ comparison.
      If they were an invariably stupid purchase people wouldn't buy them.

      As it is with most things in Europe, prices in Dollars are usually changed to the same number in Europe. So a $249 iPod costs 249, or about $310, which is kinda a pain in the butt, but you get used to it. (it's more that Americans are getting them cheaper than normal because of the low value of the Dollar in recent years) At least that includes sales tax though (19% soon, grrrrr). That Cowon want so much is just an obscene ripoff though.

  23. Killing the MP3? by mpapet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because it will decimate every other mp3 player brand besides apple, I wonder if this isn't a play to destroy the concept of owning your music entirely.

    Yes, I know they claim to play an mp3, but the devil is in the details. As in they will likely make it very inconvenient to use mp3's. Kind of like how easy it is to open may formats in MSWORD, but very difficult to use anything other than .doc.

    The thing I'm interested in seeing is the wireless sharing. I don't think the average mp3 player consumer -wants- sharing, but I'd be very interested in them proving me wrong.

    What's even more interesting will be the first virus transferred from zune-to-zune.

    It's microsoft. It had to be said.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Killing the MP3? by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      Because it will decimate every other mp3 player brand besides apple,

      Where's the evidence of this?

      Yes, I know they claim to play an mp3, but the devil is in the details. As in they will likely make it very inconvenient to use mp3's.

      Then it won't sell real well to people who want an MP3 player, will it?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Killing the MP3? by dreamlax · · Score: 1

      Panasonic released an "MP3" player which used SD cards for external storage. Since I don't use Windows and the only software it was bundled with was for Windows, I figured I could just load MP3s onto the SD card using a card reader/writer. Well, I couldn't. It turns out the software is mandatory as it encrypts the MP3s somehow to play ONLY on that particular player, nowhere else. I tried using WINE etc, but it wasn't worth the effort, so instead I bought one of these: http://www.picnroll.com/. It was pretty cheap (cheaper than the Panasonic player), and it's simply drag and drop (or "cp *.[Mm][Pp]3 /media/PicNRoll").

      Can they really call it an MP3 player when it doesn't truly play plain "MP3s"? It's a little misleading. It's like buying a car, discovering it requires special treatment to the petrol before it goes into your tank, and the only place you can fill it up is at a place you don't want to go (because they are known to be overpriced for their service).

    3. Re:Killing the MP3? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      What's even more interesting will be the first virus transferred from zune-to-zune.

      Ummm, doesn't a device have to be able to execute code from writable memory to "catch" a virus? I presume (make that hope) this device has its code in flash and doesn't have the ability to install and run other code? Now I guess if someone could find a buffer overflow problem and then somehow get it to execute code from the media file ... but that's a bit of a stretch I think.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  24. what about sharing your own stuff? by gooberguy25 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    what if me and my band record stuff on the computer and throw the mp3 on the zune, and then share it with a friend, does he still only have 3 times to listen to it, and then unsucsessfuly try to download it off the marketplace?

    1. Re:what about sharing your own stuff? by iroll · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've got $20 that says only protected, purchased WMV's (or w/e they're called) will share. It's just a brazen way to drive people to purchase from the Zune store; they have no interest in sharing everything. Of course, they'll tell you that they only allow that kind of sharing to keep from "confusing" customers with shared files that can't be purchased. Thanks for the assistance, MS.

      They've already hinted at it, saying that only "certain" files can be shared.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    2. Re:what about sharing your own stuff? by EggyToast · · Score: 1
      I'm hardly a Microsoft apologist, but I'm pretty sure that the "certain" files can be shared means that some files can have it turned off. Otherwise, they're all shareable. Some majors are probably still afraid that people will send a whole album, and the receiver will simply plug their Zune into a tape deck or their computer's line-in and dub the whole thing off.

      I'm gonna laugh if the files that share the easiest are the ones that are ripped by users from their own CDs or "indie" mp3.s

    3. Re:what about sharing your own stuff? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Yep, otherwise it would be just like P2P cause everyone would be sharing ripped mp3 copies of songs rather than the WMV version. Though allowing that type of sharing would be revolutionary IMHO... but they'll never allow it. Someone will hack it a few months after release though... some sort of complex firmware update required though, so a no go for the masses.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:what about sharing your own stuff? by WhiteSpade · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with the protected WMA only. Right on. ---Alex

    5. Re:what about sharing your own stuff? by admactanium · · Score: 1
      I'm hardly a Microsoft apologist, but I'm pretty sure that the "certain" files can be shared means that some files can have it turned off. Otherwise, they're all shareable. Some majors are probably still afraid that people will send a whole album, and the receiver will simply plug their Zune into a tape deck or their computer's line-in and dub the whole thing off.
      i'm curious why you're sure that all forms of files can be shared. i find it more likely that you'll only be able to share zune-bought music than user-ripped mp3's. it would obviously be easier for them to control the drm of a zune-bought music file than that of an mp3.
  25. If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be on Slashdot three times a day.

  26. I imagine lots of people care by th3axe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may not be earthshaking news, but there's a lot of people who care - every person who owns MS stock. Microsoft has to keep pursuing new markets and Zune, like it or not, is one of their plays to get into a new market and keep the money flowing. (Of course, if they insist on losing money like they are with Xbox, that story may change.)

    Microsoft's markets are largely saturated and under increasing pressure from FOSS and other products. And that's not a good story to tell investors. Microsoft hasn't had a killer product for a while and it's a company that thrives on growth. They need new brands badly because the ones they have are aging, and old brands, while good in financial and insurance markets, are not so good in consumer and high tech markets.

    --
    "It's real and we can touch it, so least we know where we stand." - Jack Burton
    1. Re:I imagine lots of people care by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Well, Microsoft has always had good hardware products... ironic, really...

      But as someone or another noticed last time there was mention of Zune on /., Zune won't have the coolness factor iPod has. Or had.

      And I, for one, don't know anyone who'll be excited over it.

      Then again, no-one I know owns Microsoft stock...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    2. Re:I imagine lots of people care by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0

      Your sig is so appropriate for this discussion!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  27. haxx0red by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 0

    To get around the 3-plays-in-3-days nerf, couldn't you just not let the song play all the way through? I know the iPod firmware (and iTunes as well) doesn't count a song as "played" unless it finished playing the last bit...

    1. Re:haxx0red by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      I used to use the same technique back in the modem / bbs days. Most bbs's would enforce and upload / download ratio. I'd be downloading something with xmodem, and hit cancle in the middle of the last packet. The packet would continue transmitting, but my side wouldn't send an acknowledgement (instead it would send an abort), and the bbs would't register it as a download.
      Ok, kindof off topic, but that just brought back a bunch of memories.

  28. Song-sharing? by msuzio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is the stupidest feature I have ever heard of. Did they do any market research that led them to believe this was something people actually *wanted*? And that it worked the way they would want it to work?

    So let me get this straight... if I have a Zune... and my friend has a Zune...

    I can send them a track. Presuming the units sync up, and wireless works, and the phase of the moon is correct, because wireless is still basically tin-can-and-string at times... ...and he can listen to it for three days before it self-destructs?

    Lame. Useless. Unless my friend and I both decided to take a risk and go out and get one of these doohickies each, how would this situation ever come up? Even if you find another Zune owner, what are the chances he also shares you musical interests?

    1. Re:Song-sharing? by buddhaunderthetree · · Score: 1

      Actually it's worse than that. They can only listen to it three times in those three days.

      --
      "Technology.....the knack of so arranging the world that we don't have to experience it." Max Firsch
    2. Re:Song-sharing? by Kuciwalker · · Score: 1

      If you could configure it to automatically listen to music of other people around you (e.g. on the train), it'd be pretty cool.

    3. Re:Song-sharing? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even if you find another Zune owner, what are the chances he also shares you musical interests?

      That's simple. There's only 100 songs at any given time that you should have any interest in, and they're kept in a convenient list called the Billboard Top 100. If your music hasn't been on the Top 100, then you have no business listening to it.

      After all, if people were interested in totally different types of music, the record companies would have to spend too much money marketing and producing all these different groups and artists. So it's better now that we all just listen to the same music.

    4. Re:Song-sharing? by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should just shut up and be thankful that the RIAA conceded to that "long" a period of time...

    5. Re:Song-sharing? by daniel422 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obviously you are no longer in high-school, or junior high, or even elementary school here in the US. The proliferation of iPods and portable music players among those who can't actually afford them themselves (but their parents bought them one) is staggering. So is the propensity to share music in these user groups -- something the iPod makes a tad more inconvenient than flaky wireless.
      While I can't personally say I'd use this feature much (since I'm long since out of school), it seems to make perfect sense for these types of groups to desire such a feature. I also could see sharing a new song occasionally with a friend so they could purchase it themselves if they wished (since song use is limited). All in all -- this seems more like a "demo song" feature intended to increase music sales (much like listening to samples of songs on the iTunes store, but you get to take them with you).
      You don't design a product assuming no one will buy it ("if I find another zune owner") -- you assume it will be a smashing success because of all the great features you've implemented.
      And really -- wireless in an open-air area, ad-hoc, works great -- like cell phones!;) You're using it to share a song with someone right in front of you! Your comments (generously modded "insightful") show a distinct lack thereof.

    6. Re:Song-sharing? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Also, it's another useless corporate substitute. It is more likely that you know, someone might just simply hand their own music player to their friend and say 'Hey, listen to this nice music!' or something. Also, the even more likely scenario is that "Hey, let's upload these nice mp3 files on your laptop!"

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    7. Re:Song-sharing? by msuzio · · Score: 1

      The problem is, it's a feature that is completely useless until you hit that critical mass. If you're the first person with a Zune, you get nothing out of the feature. You don't even know if it's cool, or if it's flaky and doesn't ever manage to work as expect -- like I said, you need a starting population of at least 2 to even begin to grassroots-market this.

      I'm not in high school, but I also know (and this hasn't changed since I was in high school) that fads are entrenched. You don't want to be the kid who has the new untested thing -- you want to be the kid who has the black IPod Nano just like every other kid. Short of them giving this away en masse, I'm not sure how it's going to take off. I certainly don't see song sharing as a killer feature that will get it there, that's for sure.

    8. Re:Song-sharing? by msuzio · · Score: 1

      Ad hoc wireless, in my experience, actually doesn't work well at all. I've had nothing but problems with laptops, even laptops of the same type, syncing up. I'm not saying it's a constant failure, but in a situation where I want to spontaneously share a tune, who wants to struggle at all with any step of that process? The frustration factor in those cases is a real concern.

      And I certainly think I'm insightful, so there!!! :-P

    9. Re:Song-sharing? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot the potential for massive drive-by 'virusing' via ad-hoc wireless.

      I see that the Zune downloads a file from another wireless point. Then syncs back with PC and viruses galore.

      Lots of potential there.

      And ironically, it will use the wireless security holes first 'shown' on a MacBook at Security Focus.
      http://daringfireball.net/2006/08/curious_case

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Song-sharing? by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      > That is the stupidest feature I have ever heard of. Did they
      > do any market research that led them to believe this was
      > something people actually *wanted*? And that it worked the way
      > they would want it to work?

      As I see it this is not a feature for consumers. This is feature for record companies. It is like advertising records. You can sample some records from friend (or stranger - not specified yet) device. These records will expire in some time leaving you only with their names and a link to buy them. :) So it is like promoting new records, same as in radio broadcast - you hear a record for free and then you want to buy it.

      It is stupid but I think this is the design goal/assumption of this feature. Since for sure it is not designed to share music freely.

      Of course these are just speculations since it can't be otherwise judging from few photos and brief description of functionality.

      So I agree with you - it is a complete failure. I don't see any use of that. If I think some record is great I will go to my friend and say "hey put this record on it is rocking" (or something) - and then we will listen to it together on big hifi.

      > So let me get this straight... if I have a Zune... and my
      > friend has a Zune... I can send them a track. Presuming the
      > units sync up, and wireless works, and the phase of the moon
      > is correct, because wireless is still basically tin-can-and-string
      > at times... ...and he can listen to it for three days before
      > it self-destructs?

      Yeah it is stupid. :) I also wonder how this wifi stuff will work.

      > Lame. Useless. Unless my friend and I both decided to take a
      > risk and go out and get one of these doohickies each, how would
      > this situation ever come up? Even if you find another Zune owner,
      > what are the chances he also shares you musical interests?

      Oh! Zune is not about your music intrests. :) It is about selling a lot of pop music to a lot of people and also doing a lot of "sharing" (think like commercials). Zune is really not fucused on customer, it is focused on making money of customers and deals with large record companies that don't rally like musical interest, they like *pop*ular music.

      This "sharing" (but again - judging on few sentences of description, not real) like misses content that can be shared freely. Like free licensed music (there is such), fair-use music (like you recorded something off air and want to share it).

    11. Re:Song-sharing? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Even if you find another Zune owner, what are the chances he also shares you musical interests?

      Who cares if they share it? One of the kickass things about being exposed to stuff that's not your usual thing is that you might find something *new* that you like. Personally, I like the idea that some random stranger might be able to send me some track I've never heard before - but that's me, I like being exposed to new stuff.

      As to your other complaint - the lack of people who use them - I don't think anyone is going to buy one just for the wi-fi. However, if enough people buy them because of the other features (or the price), there will be, if the iPod is any guide, plenty of them out there. At least, that's what MS is banking on with this.

      For me, there would have to be several things that go into a buying decision:

      1) Usability - I've had 2 mp3 players. An archos and an iPod. The archos took WAY too long to get to the music I wanted, and was just annoying as hell to use. The iPod is MUCH easier to work with - I can get to any song in my library (12,000 and counting...) very quickly.

      2) Battery life - it's got to be at least as good as my iPod. Bonus if I can replace the battery easily myself.

      3) Features - a bigger screen than my iPod would be nice (I have an hour commute by bus in the morning and evening so I do a bit of tv watching on this thing), and definitely radio capability are big for me. The wi-fi bit would be cute, but honestly I'd probably leave it off most of the time to conserve juice. Also, obviously, non-drm'd music would have to be playable.

      4) Construction - usually MS hardware products are pretty decent (as long as you don't lay them on carpet :p) - so at least as sturdy as my iPod, preferably with a less scratch-prone screen.

      5) Price - hopefully cheaper than an iPod, but if not, if it was as good as an iPod on the things I mention, I'd consider one as a replacement.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    12. Re:Song-sharing? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      What, and then there is a .exe or similar left on the downloads folder on the Windows PC? This folder will probably be protected against execution by MS as well. And media normally doesn't execute virusses. That said, this is coming from a company that practically introduced the text file virus, the media virus, the ASN.1 virus, the email virus and the .exe virus.

    13. Re:Song-sharing? by jambarama · · Score: 1

      and I know I've seen an article here on /. where someone figured out how to embed a virus in a wma file. Microsoft just said the virus writer was using the same api (of sorts) that they use for drm and no patch would be forthcoming. Only a matter of time before someone writes a virus that runs on one of these things. Put the two together, slap them all over kazaa, and anyone with a zune, within wifi distance of an infected one, is hosed.

      OTOH there has to be two zunes close together for it to work, and the chance that more than two people get these, let alone two people in the same city, is pretty negligable. : )

    14. Re:Song-sharing? by daniel422 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't disagree about the critical mass aspect -- but it doesn't negate my point (about designing for the future). Just because it's not a feature on most devices doesn't mean it's not wanted. Ever tried to send a friend a song off your iPod? It's a pain in the ass (as it is with most). I think the wireless is a novel idea for this and even the 3 day rule (or whatever it is) seems a good way to appease the recording companies. That it only works with other zunes (and presumably other wi-fi enabled computers) sucks for those that don't have a zune -- not the other way around.
      I've also had issues with laptops, but not many with small wireless devices designed specifically for ad-hoc connections, like the Nokia 770 and Nintendo DS. These types of products seem specifically designed to be used in such a manner. Heck, I use my 770 as a connection tester -- it works great. I think with proper design of this function there is no reason why it shouldn't work easily and reliably -- let's see how well it works on the zune.
      Sorry -- the insight line of mine was a cheap shot. I appreciate the tone of your last responses, particularly in light of mine. :)

    15. Re:Song-sharing? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Look at Apple's last set of iPod updates. Brighter LEDs and new batteries (ie, things Apple doesn't develop). The only thing Apple added to the iPod was a search feature. Oh yeah--and now we get games (from an extra $1.99) from the 1990s (Tetris) instead of the 1970s (Breakout).

      Compare that to the ability to wirelessly share music and tell me which one is more innovative?

      Sorry. Microsoft just beat out Apple in the innovation department. Whether that will ultimately mean anything (Apple has been beating Microsoft for years but it hasn't made a big difference) is debatable.

    16. Re:Song-sharing? by tecnopa · · Score: 1

      its not about song sharing, its about virus spreading and security patch releasing! duh!

    17. Re:Song-sharing? by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

      And about the 3-day thing...if you get a full track, then you have 3 whole days to hook up the player to your PC, play the track to a file, delete the time-crippled version & re-load the new one! Wow! What a feature! I bet the RIAA is gonna love that. :)

    18. Re:Song-sharing? by msuzio · · Score: 1

      The concept isn't bad, but the execution of it (at least to me) seems so crippled and, well, un-fun, that I wonder if it will actually be used. The basic idea is good -- but then they fall flat on finding a way to make it compelling.

      If they could pair this with some music recommendation service concept like Last.fm or Pandora, and make it so that when my Zune comes near your Zune, they chat and exchange some info and maybe I get some music *recommendations* dropped onto my box, that might be cool. Fraught with security problems? Sure! But solve those, and it might be fun. I know I might find it fun to tell my Zune "accept up to 10 tracks broadcast/offered to you at a time". Go check my "recommended" tracks every so often, and if I found even one cool song in the process -- bonus! Even if the song expired after three listens (hopefully with no time limit, three days is lame), I still got the chance to try something new, and I got it "for free".

      This is like telling your Tivo to record stuff it thinks you might like. You go every so often and check what it's chosen, refine the recommendations via thumbs up / thumbs down, and eventually it starts getting "only the good stuff" for you. Why is that so hard to program in? Most of the work for that could be done via a Zune link-up to your PC or the Internet directly, and it would drive more music sales or drive a partnership with someone like Last.fm.

      Now, see... that is a killer feature. Still DRM, but at least it gives me something of worth right there. Certainly, for tech geeks, talking to people is tough -- but letting your computer talk to their computer and get some stuff works.

  29. h.264 is excellent for QVGA by Cybert4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The idea behind h.264 is to use more computing power (or more likely in this case dedicated ASIC) to give a better picture for your size bitsream--at any resolution. QVGA is nice because it is 4:3, and is thus more compatible than the huge array of widescreen ratios. 320x240 is a pretty well recognized standard--you'll see a lot of video recorded natively at this resolution.

    1. Re:h.264 is excellent for QVGA by amper · · Score: 1

      480x272 (the size of the PSP screen, and the size of many movie trailers on Apple's site) would seem to be the way to go. OF course, the difficulty is then making the device usable by left-handed people, or people who just want the controls on the left, while still making the device small enough to fit in a pocket. Now, Microsoft's control design actually suffers from fewer necessary compromises than the iPod's click wheel for this purpose, so I think the next round of updates to the iPod and Zune designs should be interesting to see.

      I am certainly an Apple fanboy, but I have to say that Apple *needs* some competition in this arena, if just to keep them relatively honest.

      And I *like* the brown.

  30. Looks OK, but.. by le0p · · Score: 1

    While I think it actually looks pretty nice, I as well as many iPod owners will never make the "switch" to a player like this for one reason: iTunes. I can take or leave the iPod itself. It's nice but I've had terrible luck with quality and have gone through about 5 of them. It's not been a perfect relationship. However, I LOVE iTunes. I use it daily and since I bought my iPod I have bought hundreds, maybe a thousand songs through it. The inability of another player to play these songs (without going through alot of trouble to remove the DRM) is a show stopper for me.

    --
    "I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability."-Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Looks OK, but.. by NSIM · · Score: 1

      Funny, different strokes, for different folks. I love my 5G IPOD, beautiful of engineering, and very reliable for me. But IHMO iTunes is the most overrated piece of crap I've ever installed on my PC, horrible UI, slow, difficult to navigate, the list goes on. Personally I use Redchair's Anapod and never fire up iTunes. That said, I'm no big fan of MediaPlayer 10 (or 11 for that matter) either.

    2. Re:Looks OK, but.. by edmicman · · Score: 1
      The inability of another player to play these songs (without going through alot of trouble to remove the DRM) is a show stopper for me.
      Isn't that a showstopper for using Itunes in the first place? It's ridiculous to pay for music that you're locked into a single piece of hardware/software for, especially at essentially the same price of a CD (if you were to buy all of the tracks on the CD).
    3. Re:Looks OK, but.. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      So in other words... you've been locked in. You're disappointed by Apple's portable players and would give others a chance, but there's too much to lose. Microsoft might even offer a better end-to-end solution, but lots of people are too tightly locked-in to Apple to switch. I might call it poetic justice for this to happen to Microsoft, except that I have no interest in portable music or downloadable DRM-laden music, so I have no reason to care about any of the companies involved. And I'm sure Microsoft will do fine (they usually do). The real losers are consumers; you're stuck with Apple and only Apple and you've just started to realize it now.

      I have never bought anything from iTunes and I won't buy anything from Microsoft's upcoming music service. Even if I was OK with the general idea of not being trusted to respect copyright but at the same time forced to trust some corporation for my continued ability to use media I've paid for, I still think there's too much risk of any one company being marginalized in the market to the extent that their media files are useless.

  31. But does it support by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gapless playback?

    As of yesterday, it's a must have

    1. Re:But does it support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's ipod has been a huge success even though it sports half the useful features of its competitors. I think Microsoft will get by if they're missing one or two things.

    2. Re:But does it support by ben+there... · · Score: 0
      As of yesterday, it's a must have

      Mmmm...not so much.

      I've heard so much hype that I had to look it up to be sure it was the same boring thing that Winamp supported in the 90s. Yep, same thing, just for portables. Not very exciting, and definitely not a must have. Well, maybe if you're stuck on Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:But does it support by Mr_Tulip · · Score: 1

      Gapless playback was supported by my old "Archos Jukebox" portable MP3 player - that clunky old thing must be at least 7 years old now.

      Without gapless playback, good luck listening to DJ mixed sets, where each new song is beat-matched and mixed into the previous one. I couldn't comprehend why anyone would release an MP3 player WITHOUT it, and was pretty disappointed when told the iPod couldn't do it.

    4. Re:But does it support by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Name some of the features. FM playback? iPod has that. Games? Calendar and address book? iPod too.

    5. Re:But does it support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ.

      The fact that Apple only introduced that functionality yesterday into the iPod after five years, and it didn't stop it from becoming the runaway market leader, would show that it isn't a must have.

    6. Re:But does it support by big_gibbon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > definitely not a must have. Well, maybe if you're stuck on Pink Floyd.

      Or the Beatles. Or RadioHead. Or pretty much any classical or electronic music, ever. Or any DJ mixes.

      In fact, it's only if you listen to pop, rock, or country that you *wont* care about gapless

      P

    7. Re:But does it support by amichalo · · Score: 1

      The fact that Apple only introduced that functionality (gapless playback) yesterday into the iPod after five years, and it didn't stop it from becoming the runaway market leader, would show that it isn't a must have.

      AC - You usually have such crap to add to the discussion. Thank you for an insightful comment!

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  32. It's ugly. by b1gk1tty · · Score: 0

    Well, that's overstating it a bit. But I would have thought that all the money being poured into this thing they (M$) could at least come up with something original. Instead they put out a product that is orthogonal to it's nearest competitor.

    Lame in my opinion. Oh well. Perhaps a quick hack to turn the WIFI feature into something cool...

  33. VBR is part of the MPEG1/layer 3 spec... by daniel422 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    so all players that support mp3 should also support it.

  34. Crisp Photos? by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

    Wow, those QVGA screens sure do blow up nicely, without any pixelation!

    1. Re:Crisp Photos? by ksattic · · Score: 1

      For anyone who didn't get what the parent was talking about, those screenshots are clearly simulated. QVGA will not render images as crisply as that.

  35. The irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony is that the only way I would buy it is if it supported ogg.

    1. Re:The irony by steevc · · Score: 1

      OGG would be a minimum requirement. That's what all my music gets ripped to these days. I have yet to buy a download of anything. Generally with a CD you are still free to do what you want with the music. I don't have anything that plays any of the protected formats (Linux PC, Palm, iRiver iFP).

      If I ever buy a large capacity audio player I want it to have some recording functionality as well, mainly for jam sessions.

      So basically it's not for me.

    2. Re:The irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I ever buy a large capacity audio player I want it to have some recording functionality as well, mainly for jam sessions.

      me too /aol
    3. Re:The irony by vertinox · · Score: 1

      OGG is nice, but iPods won't play it so the MP3 will live a bit longer.

      I've heard mostly because it doesn't have enough processing power, but who knows.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  36. So Zune? by TechDogg · · Score: 0

    So soon?

    It's seems Microsoft will finally launch something on time and as promised. Must be the begining of the post Gates era.

    --
    Got MILF? It does a body good!
  37. Box art? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

    If anyone is wondering what the box art will look like, here it is

    1. Re:Box art? by davron05 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This video also came to my mind and I was very suprised when I have seen how Zune's box will look like. I thought "man, Microsoft finally learned something". The box looks very stylish to me.

    2. Re:Box art? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      copying Apple is something MS learned a long time ago...

      I kid..I kid....or not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Box art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a black box with an unrecognizable logo that in no way relates it to music. Seems like they tried to hard towards simplicity and ended up with nothing instead.

  38. Check out the second picture... by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...the white model. The happy couple are frollicking in ... the east river of New York City. That's the Manhattan bridge in the background, and they're esentially right below and slightly west of the Brooklyn Bridge.

    I have walked/jogged/biked/fled from that area thousands of times and it is *not* anywhere you want to put your feet in the water...the water itself is unbelievably polluted, and unless the pic is doctored, or somebody spent a month cleaning up the area, the dude is walking on broken glass, rusted everything, and stuff that can't be identified, and maybe that's for the best.

    I'm not sure what to message to take from the pic: "Take a life threatening chance: buy a Zune!" comes to mind.

    1. Re:Check out the second picture... by amichalo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what to message to take from the pic: "Take a life threatening chance: buy a Zune!" comes to mind.

      That made for a laugh over my morning coffee...thanks!

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  39. why buy such an expensive player? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

    I've got a £30 1gb mp3 player. It works perfectly, supports mp3 and wma, and I'm not especially worried if I lose it.

    A Zune, a Zen, or an iPod are all very expensive, and I'd worry about lazing on a beach with them, or doing something that risks damaging them, like jogging (what with me being clumsy and all). Hence my sticking with cheap players.

    What interests me is the idea of a disposable mp3 player that I can buy in packs of ten and chuck when they get ragged or worn out in some way, or just not care if I lose them.

    Besides, I'd be willing to bet that a disposable mp3 player would pretty soon have analogues of the most populer features of these expensive players.

  40. Must be a hoax by Skuto · · Score: 1

    This makes no sense whatsoever.

    A Microsoft player supporting H.264 and AAC?

    Microsoft is fighting a big battle AGAINST both formats with WMA Pro and VC-1. It makes little sense for them to release a player that supports them. It's would be like Intel adopting AMD64, but instead of it being out of necessity, doing it voluntarly.

    I don't believe a word of it. Next news item: Microsoft releases Word for Linux :P

    1. Re:Must be a hoax by iluvcapra · · Score: 1
      This makes no sense whatsoever. A Microsoft player supporting H.264 and AAC?

      It might be an h.264 and AAC inside a WMV wrapper. WMV is not 'open', even if it is quite well reverse-engineered at this point.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:Must be a hoax by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I did a double take over H.264 at first, but maybe Microsoft have realised that they have to support these formats or end up with a dead duck that no-one wants.

    3. Re:Must be a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft never claimed the Zune can play AAC. They claim "Zune software can import audio files in unprotected WMA, MP3, AAC; photos in JPEG; and videos in WMV, MPEG-4, H.264." Meaning basically, if you have the codecs installed it will re-encode them as Windows Media for play on the Zune. Which is the same thing Apple does with WMA files, converts them to AAC for use on the iPod.

    4. Re:Must be a hoax by Skuto · · Score: 1

      But then there would be no point in including both. (Unless MS likes to pay patent fees to it's competitors)

    5. Re:Must be a hoax by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent uninformed. h.264 and AAC are both publicly documented standards, and may be implemented royalty-free.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    6. Re:Must be a hoax by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Oooh, I'm completely wrong. Sorry about that, everyone.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  41. 3rd party improvements to follow: by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1st will likely be a means of sharing over wireless without the self-destruct "feature".
    Probably shortly to follow, either a firmware update that adds more codecs, or a software app that transcodes to whatever Windows format is being used for video on that platform.
    Next, a web-browser that can take you to various pages you have saved as favorites.
    Finally, complete Linux port.
    Any other good ideas?

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:3rd party improvements to follow: by dangitman · · Score: 1

      A toaster oven accessory.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:3rd party improvements to follow: by phobos72 · · Score: 1
      > software app that transcodes to whatever Windows format is being used for video on that platform.
      Heh? That will not be necessary, I think:

      Zune will support [...] video formats (WMV, H.264, MPEG4, 320x240), and JPG photo files. On Zune file formats

    3. Re:3rd party improvements to follow: by Churla · · Score: 1

      That first one there...

      That won't be called a 3rd party improvement. It will on the other hand be called a "warranty voiding unauthorized modification to your device", i.e. .. a hack.

      Not that there's anything wrong with that. I can't wait to see that be possible, so that straight up MP3's can be beamed across. Of course the RIAA will not stand for that and try to have the technology declared a violation of the DMCA.

      From the "how this could be used legally" department. Imagine being a local band, gigging around town. You have your little merch table where people can buy your CD's, shirts, g-strings, whatever. You also have your merch guy running a laptop which has a "zune distribution app" on it. Anybody with a Zune at the show get's a beep saying "Want to download a sample track of the latest CD for free?"

      I could see that being very pervasive.

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  42. I care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't wait to do my first turdcast with a brown one.

  43. Three reasons why this won't work. by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    1. They're like 5 or 6 years too late to the party.
    2. Brown? What kind of color choice is that?
    3. Most crucially, it doesn't run LINUX.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  44. Obligatory... by payndz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wireless. More space than a Nomad. Lame.

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Obligatory... by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      I scrolled down the entire set of comments just to see this. I know, after all, that someone would have said it.

  45. "bullshots" by faust2097 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I find it amazing that, according to their press photos, The Zune's 320 x 240 screen is so amazing that it can display what appears to be five times the number of pixels it actually has.

    Someone give those ClearType guys a raise!

  46. Wireless sharing = new virus vector by BearRanger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Assuming you can get the wireless networking to even work (with Microsoft's ad-hoc networking history that is NOT a given) how long do you think it will be before the first Zune virus appears?

    Also, since the thing supports MP3 and AAC and uses USB to connect, why won't Microsoft support the Mac? It should be trivial to do, and it would eliminate so many complaints about it being a "closed" system. Obviously iPod supports Windows for the market share, but Apple can legitimately claim that they have the only product that supports Mac and Windows.

    1. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by sundaydriver · · Score: 1

      Good grief, it's not Windows. Let's stop with the virus-everything-associated-with-MS. It only shows you're shilling the /. standard lines.

      As far as I know, the XBOX and XBOX 360 haven't been ravaged by virii. Besides, virii aren't the real problem with Windows anymore... it's trojans and social-engineering attacks that cause the vast majority of malware and stability problems.

    2. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by BearRanger · · Score: 1
      As far as I know, the XBOX and XBOX 360 haven't been ravaged by virii. Besides, virii aren't the real problem with Windows anymore... it's trojans and social-engineering attacks that cause the vast majority of malware and stability problems.

      Which proves the point. Ad-hoc wireless networks to share music. We can't judge the security measures that may or may not be in place yet, but that looks a lot like a socially engineered vulnerability to me.

      "Dude, I just downloaded the hot new Christina Aguilera song and video. Let me share it with your Zune."

      Now sync that with your desktop/laptop.

    3. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      Also, since the thing supports MP3 and AAC and uses USB to connect, why won't Microsoft support the Mac? It should be trivial to do
      Trivial? I'm not so sure about that. It's not like Microsoft can just hire MusicMatch to add OS X support for their player. It was years before Apple released a Windows version of iTunes with iTunes Music Store.

      If some Mac users are interested in the Zune (and aren't interested in their music store), is there a good Mac alternative to iTunes that can be bundled with the Zune?

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    4. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drag and drop.

    5. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by lavaface · · Score: 1

      The reason is that the latest Windows Media Player on the Mac does not support Microsoft's new DRM. No DRM=no store=nozune for mac.

    6. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0
      how long do you think it will be before the first Zune virus appears?
      Stupid question here, but how would the Zune contract a virus? I assume it would not have the capacity to execute without flashing the firmware. I'm not trying to say your're wrong, I genuinely want to know.

      BTW, wouldn't you think that firmware would have some DRM system to prevent unsigned mods or even the Linux kernel from running?
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    7. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by BearRanger · · Score: 1

      Being a vector for a virus doesn't necessarily mean you're going to be affected by it. It's a matter of accepting wireless connections from untrusted sources. Conceivably, you could include malicious code as part of an MP3, store it on a Zune and have it execute on the player when invoked or have it execute after syncing with your desktop.

      By the way, I consider advertising to be malicious code. How long before we also see wireless broadcasts for Zunes that have something to sell you?

      Again, this is all speculation. Perhaps Microsoft have learned their lesson and the security may turn out to be adequate.

    8. Re:Wireless sharing = new virus vector by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of the viewpoint that we must limit functionality for fear of malware. "Let's not do wireless sharing because it might lead to viruses!!" It's akin to giving in to terrorists. "Let's not allow drinks on a plane because a terrorist might mix them into a bomb!!"

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  47. ATT: NineNine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A quick tip.

    If they are short on brown, you can buy a white one and stick it up your ass.

    welcome,

    AC

  48. Check out MICROSOFT's wrongdoing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. Rockbox support? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Will this thing be able to run Rockbox? Or a version of Linux, like iPodLinux? That's the only way I'd ever buy one of these, and then only if the price is really good. I won't buy a player without Ogg support.

    I do have to give them credit for keeping the front of the device clear of any stupid logos or brand names. I don't see an ugly "Microsoft" logo or anything else there, just the screen and the controls. But the brown is horrid.

    1. Re:Rockbox support? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      How the hell does anybody know if it's going to run rockbox until it's released? Jesus christ.

    2. Re:Rockbox support? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      IANARD (Rockbox Developer), but I imagine they could look at things like 1) does it have user-upgradable firmware?, and 2) what type of CPU does it have? If it's the same kind of CPU that one of the other Rockbox-supported players uses, then it probably wouldn't be very difficult to port it. If it's a totally different CPU, it would probably require much more effort.

      Look at how popular the Xbox1 was for running Linux on, after all, much to Microsoft's chagrin. If this device is similar, as in it has good hardware at a really good price, then it would be an attractive product for people willing to run OSS firmware (at least after scratching off the "Microsoft" name on the backside).

      Is there any word on how much this thing will cost? I didn't see it in the article (which I skimmed very quickly).

  50. Don't sell the Slashdot editors short by tyme · · Score: 1
    xxxJonBoyxxx wrote:
    If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be on Slashdot three times a day.

    They day is not over yet, we have plenty of time for a repost or two.
    --
    just a ghost in the machine.
  51. From a 2x iPod owner by tf23 · · Score: 1

    I'm on my 2nd iPod, a 60GB 3G.

    This zune looks pretty nice. Not that I'd ever watch more then a music-video or clips people email (or snag off video-websites) on either the Zune or a video iPod. (I might put a DVD movie on it and play the movie to a friend's TV, however). The picture sharing looks very cool. However, most people I know either email, use flickr, or use their .mac account to share pictures with me. So cool yes, useful, not so much.

    What concerns me is battery for both the big color screen and the wifi. I know when wifi's powered up on my laptop the battery doesn't last near as long.

    But coming this product coming from MS? I find myself impressed. Especially after watching the Zune video on YouTube.

  52. Classical MS action... by kosmosik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well the *photos* do look nice. But nobody have seen the device in wild so they can be as well 3DStudio renders. :) Typical for MS they announce something like it is real - Zune is unreal as for now. Where can I get one? Where can I read independent review of one? Etc. Etc. Etc.

    It does not even has branding on it. Just the look of it is not sufficient for branding - look of iPod is a brand itself, this looks like an iPod clone.

    Actually I am used to MS strategies like announcing LongHorn with all WinFS and great stuff that just yet still is not here. So I take this announcement like usual. I will think that this is anything worth looking at when I actually can touch one.

    Also I have some concerns, especially with:

    1. The interface. Those *three* photos look nice but they do not tell anything about how the device works? Is it easy to use? I've used MS PDA (PocketPC) and it was horrible. I am with Palm now which is somewhat less horrible - so I don't se MS mobile products as quite easy to use or reliable.

    2. Those ad-hoc wifi networks - how it is going to work? I've used MS PDA with wifi and it was pain. Actually wifi is quite painfull as for now (especially in MS arrangement). So how they are going to wifify those devices? IMHO wifi is not quite good for establishing such semi-PAN networks - BlueTooth is. But wifi - it is a hog on battery for sure.

    So conluding - this is not something real. These are few photos even without branding (forget specs, pricing, performance and so on). So it is nothing actually - just to say "hey wait (like few months... or years) and we will have something like iPod is right now!", "don't buy iPod right now - wait (like months... years) for our mythic device" etc.

    Quite unfair but at least in this market we know who rocks with launches that are real launches for real existing products and services...

    1. Re:Classical MS action... by Rayout · · Score: 1

      Classic MS action? 1. Wait for a product to become popular and established in a market. 2. Create M$ version of product and lose money for XX years. 3. ??? 4. Profit

    2. Re:Classical MS action... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      But, but... MS have launched it, so it must be available soon. Maybe. Possibly. (Better not hold my breath)

      From TFA: Microsoft still won't spill the beans on pricing and availability (other than a vague "this holiday season")

      At least Steve Jobs gave a price ($299) and launch window (1st Q 2007, funnily enough when Leopard comes out) for his "launch" item (iTV).

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    3. Re:Classical MS action... by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      I've meant like announce product which is not real at all just to hold competition sales. Hopefully they can do this with Windows/Office. They cannot success with doing it in other markets. After all when you will go after your xmass shopping the stuff you will see that will be iPods in shiny packages, ITMS coupons and so on. Zune is on prototype photos only.

    4. Re:Classical MS action... by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      > At least Steve Jobs gave a price ($299) and launch window
      > (1st Q 2007, funnily enough when Leopard comes out) for his
      > "launch" item (iTV).

      But you are talking about Leopard and I'am talking about new generation of iPods that Zune likes to be in competition to. The fact is you can buy a new shiny iPod right *now*. It will ship to you in few days and after it is shipped you can start spending your money in new version of ITMS.

      Now with Zune you can look at some (3) photos... And... And that is basically all you can do with it. :)

    5. Re:Classical MS action... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      They do look like 3D-renders. Especially the display. Doesn't look like an actual LCD with QVGA resolution. Looks like stock photos pasted from Photoshop. Let's see how that screen actually looks under real-world lighting conditions.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Classical MS action... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      They aren't 3DStudio renders or mockups. You can see a few videos of the device in action here:
      * http://www.thenewsmarket.com/preview/?story_id=519 4

      The videos would appear to answer your questions/doubts.

    7. Re:Classical MS action... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, no, he's talking about iTV. And he's wrong about Leopard anyway. It's supposed to ship Spring 2007, which is at least 2nd quarter.

    8. Re:Classical MS action... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      OK, so I wasn't totally clear.

      The iPods were "released" (and hence available now / in a few days)

      iTV was, by the MS definition, "launched" (not yet available, but coming Real Soon Now)

      Since Steve held up a box, it seems as though it is the software, rather than the hardware, that makes it not yet available.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    9. Re:Classical MS action... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots more photos showing the zune in action here:

      http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/zune_gallery_ 01.asp

  53. Clarifying the "Plays For Sure" incompatability by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Engadget recently interviewed an MS Corporate VP regarding the Zune and how Microsoft explains the lack of supporting "Plays For Sure". The resulting statements from this Microsoft Exec are truly worrisome:

    Full Article Here"

    E: "PlaysForSure was the thrust of Microsoft's strategy until the announcement of the Zune. How does PlaysForSure fit into Microsoft's strategy going forward?"
    MS: "...There's another class of consumers that just want to get digital media, and they just want to be able to go to one store and have it all..."
    E: "Wasn't that the point of PlaysForSure?"
    MS: "...Zune says there is no choice; you get a Zune device, you hook it up to the Zune service, and it just works."

    Yikes! I thought the iPod was evil because Apple didn't give me a choice...now it seems no choice is just what the doctor ordered! How stupid does Microsoft think we are?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Clarifying the "Plays For Sure" incompatability by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Yikes! I thought the iPod was evil because Apple didn't give me a choice...now it seems no choice is just what the doctor ordered! How stupid does Microsoft think we are?

      Well, 65 million iPods and counting say we're stupid enough, not to mention the millions of people happy with Windows+Office.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  54. meh... by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

    no wireless. less space than a nomad. lame.

    /wait.

    --
    for a minute there, i lost myself...
  55. Re:Past Market History by mpapet · · Score: 1

    I spent a few years as an analyst where I had to review and massage sell-through data on computer stuff in retail and distribution.

    Outside of HP, MS decimated the top-3 in a category when they entered. I saw it with keyboards and mice for sure.

    MS (apple too) has a habit of killing competition in a category after it becomes big enough for them to enter.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  56. What makes this a product "launch"? by timbck2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't buy one (not that I would if I could). I can't find anything but a presskit on Microsoft's website. There's no Zune website. There's no mention of pricing, nor when the things will be available.

    All I see here is a half-assed response to Apple's new iPod product launch a couple days ago.

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    1. Re:What makes this a product "launch"? by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

      Please please please don't get the new iPod for Christmas gifts! Look at what we are going to have ready really really soon, really!

  57. The problems Microsoft have are by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1
    "iPod", as a brand, or 'thing' has become so interwoven into everyday society that separating "iPod" from "the music player to own" is, in my opinion, almost impossible to envisage for the foreseeable future. For the record - a quick skate around Google found this list of supported 'add-ons'....

    For the record - a quick skate around google found this list of supported 'add-ons'....

    Cars!

    Umbrellas!

    Underwear!

    Warships!

    Dildos! (SFW)

    When the Zune get's its own warship extension, then i'll start believing it has a chance.

    Also, Microsoft's reputation to the public at large, seems to encompass little more than "The company that make my computer crash", whereas Apple actually have a well-earned consumer-friendly image about them. Maybe this will change, but I just can't see it right now.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:The problems Microsoft have are by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      Christ. Don't you just hate it when you spot the obvious mistake after you post?

      *cries*

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
  58. sales slogan by thedrunkensailor · · Score: 1

    microsoft zune - better than oral surgery in a construction yard

    --
    i support the right to offend.
  59. Look, it's kind of like P2P... only it isn't.. by LittleFishSan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole "Zune-to-Zune" sharing thing seems like a gimmick. I also have a Nintendo DS, and I've never kept it in "Standby mode" and met anybody. I have arranged with friends to play against them, but it was always planned. Unless a large number of people own Zunes and there are a sizable number of people within the range of the Zune wi-fi thing, there's a slim chance you'll happen to bump into someone and listen to the song that will change your life. If you go through the trouble of meeting up with someone to listen to their music, just put the album on a flash-drive or a portable hard drive. Maybe it will make ignorent consumers think "Hey, this is the same P2P thing that Napster got busted for. I am so "on the edge!"", which might result in sales numbers. But hey, competition is good for the iPod. I'm interested to see how it will do (After all, the iPod isn't exactly 'feature heavy' either).

  60. Controls? by TheAmazingJambi · · Score: 1

    If that's a click wheel on the front then it'll do fine. The main reason that so many people seem to prefer iPods is that wheel interface. That said, the brown is UGLY.

  61. Its not widescreen! by jocknerd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dude, read the specs. Its 320x240. The screen is 3" as opposed to the iPod's 2.5".

    1. Re:Its not widescreen! by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      3" whoop. Same resolutions, and I can already read the movie credits on my iPod. If it played my iTunes-bought music, then maybe.

  62. Have you seen their strange viral marketing site? by MrAtoz · · Score: 1

    The animated video on comingZune is pretty odd, and, if you ask me, pretty disturbing. I've already seen a couple of different people who think that the rabbit is going to bite the head off the little guy ... I could see it happening. Not sure what marketing genius came up with this one ...

  63. Who Designs These Things? by AguaMyst · · Score: 1

    That is one ugly device.

  64. How will this compete? by DanielG42 · · Score: 1

    It's 50 more dollars than the equivilent iPod, plus it doesn't have the "cool" factor. The only thing that the Zune really has going for it is the built in wireless, which I feel really isn't that great of an addition for a music player.

    --
    Daniel
  65. Nothing Launched by tvon · · Score: 1

    They have not even announced pricing and availability yet.

  66. the dock connector by tf23 · · Score: 1

    Incase you're wondering if the port on the thing will be physically similar to the iPod's, it doesn't look like it.

    Pictures: small or large

  67. WiFi is a KILLER for Subscription Service by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

    I for one, will LOVE to have this device as soon as it is available. IF it has automatic synching. I subscribe to Yahoo Music Service (it was cheap when paid for the year in full), and the biggest complaint I have about the service is that I have to synch my portable player at least once a month or the subscription goes dead. And that always seems to happen when I am not near my PC or laptop. If this device can automatically synch my subscription by itself every month, so that I do not have to worry about it. That alone would make it a must buy for me. I couldn't care less about song sharing, I already have access to all the songs I want.

  68. Paging 'Creative Patent' lawsuit by mazola_jr · · Score: 1

    in 5, 4, 3 ...

  69. Yay Microsoft? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Is Microsoft blazing a trail for "share with a friend", as long as the original is legitimately "owned" (like buying a CD) and the friend doesn't give a copy to anyone else?

    There's lots of technology and social technique that could be thrown at ensuring that happens, not just MS DRM. But the biggest impediment is the total lack of any legal clarity that we still can exercise the same rights on a network to share with a friend that we have when we loan a legit copy of a CD, or play one at a party.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Yay Microsoft? by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find it's only DRM'ed WMA files purchased from the Zune music store that can be shared with friends. No way they'd let you do that with plain old MP3 files (after all, they could be pirated!).

    2. Re:Yay Microsoft? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about how the MS service works. I'm talking about the underlying legal rights. The DRM protects you only if it is "managing" a work that you have the right to share. The copyright law doesn't say anything about the right to share a "properly protected" work. It says only what rights we have to fairly use works we own, like sharing. DRM is a way of enforcing limits to prevent other uses.

      So if MS is getting lots of people to fairly share works we own, then it is reinforcing the legal underpinnings of protecting those fair use rights. That legal underpinning is not exclusive to Microsoft, or DRM protected work. Only to fair use. If people share the works fairly, then we're not liable for copyright violation. If we don't, because we broke DRM or used non-DRM works, then we are liable. But it's the liability that's locked out by DRM that I'm interested in.

      Any lawyer out there who can comment on whether MS DRM reinforces those fair use laws, or whether there's some other weasel work here that still leaves us uncertain, unless (maybe) we use MS DRM?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  70. Zune to be forgotten... by UttBuggly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...by most consumers, I'd bet.

    This just doesn't look like an iPod killer to me.

    Physically, it looks cheap.

    Feature-wise, there's nothing compelling. The wireless feature seems not well thought out and is so limited I doubt most buyers would have that as the top reason to purchase.

    And, without a distribution system like iTunes, why would an iPod owner or even a 1st time buyer choose a Zune?

    Some others have made points about accessories. That's a good question; what's available from MS? 3rd party support? Retailers signed up to give over shelf space?

    Repair policy!

    My wife had the screen on her iPod Mini crack while under warranty. Had a brand new unit from Apple in 72 hours. I bought a Shuffle like day one and it malfunctioned about 8 months out. Apple shipped me a new one and I returned the old one...in the same box...at their cost. Got the Shuffle in 48 hours! I opened both cases on the Apple site in about a minute with no hassle whatsoever.

    What will Microsoft offer? Do they have the equivalent of AppleCare?

    If they (MS) were smart, they'd have made the wireless work for an optional headset. No cords or dongles hanging from your player. Extra bucks for the "upgrade" from earplugs. Maybe they should let the Xbox marketing folks loose on this.

    No...I don't think Steve Jobs will lose any sleep...or money...over Zune.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
  71. Microsoft iPod Video by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1
    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  72. first thing by kernel_pat · · Score: 1

    write a program that can send itself from zune to zune, imagine the chaos, oh make sure it can check the color of the zune casing so it doesn't effect turd brown zunes and then everyone has to be as uncool as each other. Also I predict the new word for fecal matter will be zune, i.e. "I left a massive zune in the toilet"

  73. Buy Creative by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    If you don't like MS or Apple, but form onte of the other outfits.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Buy Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seconded

  74. Music sharing DRM? by RaymondInFinland · · Score: 1

    Ofcourse i didn't RTFA, but does anyone know how exactly that songsharing works? Can you only share songs that you bought online? Or can i also share mp3's that i uploaded myself? Do they get DRM added to them after i send them also if they didn't have it in the first place?

    What if i made the song myself? can i share it unlimited with other people or is that 'play 3 times and self-destruct' rule still in place?

  75. may i be the 1st to say by crashelite · · Score: 1

    comes in 3 colors, basic grey, apple white and shit brown

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  76. Brown? by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

    Choosing such an unstylish colour can mean only one thing: Microsoft have finally discovered the brown note.
    "I tried the Zune, but it gave me the sh*ts - so I bought an iPod instead."

  77. Wifi is a winner by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I think the Wifi is a winner. I would possibly get something like this for internet radio. But I choke on the idea of Windows/MS device. I'm sure this could run Linux, but running Linux on an MS device is not enough for me.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  78. For the few people that would actually *use* FM... by jerk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...there's the FM radio remote. I want AM radio. I use an iPod to get away from the crap on the FM dial, the real content (traffic, news, talk) on radio is on the AM band.

  79. Murky brown seems to be a theme here by JonMcL · · Score: 1

    Not only is the brown color an odd choice, but I love the picture of the happy couple standing in the water.

    That shot was taken at the base of the Brooklyn Bridge (I believe) in NYC. So the happy couple is playing in the East River -- not one of the cleanest waterways in the world. You can see the nice murky water at their feet :)

    Oh and also, as someone else pointed out, those pics and text seem awfully hi-res for a QVGA display

  80. Not enough for me by amichalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Supporting more file types is irrelevant to me. I want it to support THE FILE TYPES I USE.

    I don't have any WMA media. I do have iTunes Fairplay media. It doesn't support that.

    Further, all these "Features" are typical MS lies - the file sharing won't work with all media, It may have a screen that is 0.5" larger but will it play movie content? Are you sure?

    It doesn't even support MICROSOFT'S VERY OWN "PLAYS FOR SURE" DRM!!!!

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Not enough for me by FLEB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't have any WMA media. I do have iTunes Fairplay media. It doesn't support that.

      And that's your unfortunate decision.

      I could say the opposite if I had more WMA+DRM media than AAC+DRM, although I would have better selection, since Microsoft is more openly licensing (read: 'is licensing') the WMA+DRM codecs than Apple is with AAC+DRM.

      Of course, I'll just be happy with my unencumbered MP3 that plays on damn-near anything with an audio jack. (Yeah, if I was a purist, I'd be up-in-arms for an unpatented format, but until someone sues the LAME folks, there's little practical difference.)

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    2. Re:Not enough for me by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Didn't microsoft leak a way to break plays for sure so that they could kill the format and come up with some other new thing? I'm sure I read that somewhere...

      Also, would it even matter if someone sued the LAME guys? That stuff is pretty mature and it's not like anyone's going to be able or even interested in coming to your home and removing it from your computer.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    3. Re:Not enough for me by syousef · · Score: 1

      I'm told that "Plays for sure" will be released in some European markets as "Sure it plays?" :-)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Not enough for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Supporting more file types is irrelevant to me. I want it to support THE FILE TYPES I USE.

      I don't have any WMA media. I do have iTunes Fairplay media. It doesn't support that.

      Further, all these "Features" are typical MS lies - the file sharing won't work with all media, It may have a screen that is 0.5" larger but will it play movie content? Are you sure?

      It doesn't even support MICROSOFT'S VERY OWN "PLAYS FOR SURE" DRM!!!!


      You are an IDIOT tool. An Apple tool for sure. Lets take MS out of the picture for a sec. The Creative Zen had many things right better than the IPOD. The IPOD is very propietary. itunes fairplay media is proprietary crap. Kudos for MS to support so many open file types! If MS only supported WMA than I would agree with you, but thats not the case.
    5. Re:Not enough for me by digmediaguy · · Score: 1

      Whoa - Easy there, trigger.. let's get our facts straight, shall we?

      PlaysForSure is not DRM. WM-DRM is DRM. Both PlaysForSure and Zune use WM-DRM. PlaysForSure is nothing more than a logo slapped on a player (portable or network connected) saying that it will play any music or video purchased from a store that also has the logo. Zune is a player and a store that are tightly integrated together to enable some of the little niceties that are harder to do when one has to worry about being compatible with a variety of devices or a variety of online media stores.

      Also, if you're going to accuse MS of lying and glorify Apple, perhaps you can tell me how Windows Media Player 10 and 11 don't have auto sync, as Apple claims on their web site?

      --
      "There is only one thing more painful than learning from experience, and that is not learning from experience."
    6. Re:Not enough for me by bulliver · · Score: 1
      (Yeah, if I was a purist, I'd be up-in-arms for an unpatented format, but until someone sues the LAME folks, there's little practical difference.)

      Lame ain't an mp3 encoder. They've nothing to worry about ;)

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    7. Re:Not enough for me by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Didn't microsoft leak a way to break plays for sure so that they could kill the format and come up with some other new thing? I'm sure I read that somewhere...

      I don't know about that, but I would think that the only thing Microsoft would need to obsolete PFS is a better (or New! Better Marketed!) format and dropping support for the old format.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    8. Re:Not enough for me by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Whoa - Easy there, trigger.. let's get our facts straight, shall we?

      PlaysForSure is not DRM. WM-DRM is DRM. Both PlaysForSure and Zune use WM-DRM. PlaysForSure is nothing more than a logo slapped on a player (portable or network connected) saying that it will play any music or video purchased from a store that also has the logo. Zune is a player and a store that are tightly integrated together to enable some of the little niceties that are harder to do when one has to worry about being compatible with a variety of devices or a variety of online media stores.


      While we are getting our facts straight, why don't you do a little research - yeah, Plays For Sure is a marketing initiative, but it is also a system...a system than the Zune doesn't support in favor of it's own Zune Marketplace. Don't believe me, check out these articles.

      As for the claim you make about Windows Media Player being miss represented by Apple, why don't you offer a link to the site? I searched Apple's website and couldn't find any mention of WMP 10 or 11 on the site at all. Perhaps I am just an idiot...or perhaps you are just "remembering" something that didn't happen.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    9. Re:Not enough for me by amichalo · · Score: 1

      You are an IDIOT tool. An Apple tool for sure. Lets take MS out of the picture for a sec. The Creative Zen had many things right better than the IPOD. The IPOD is very propietary. itunes fairplay media is proprietary crap. Kudos for MS to support so many open file types! If MS only supported WMA than I would agree with you, but thats not the case.

      Okay troll, you need to take a look at the original context - The supproted file formats. While the Zune supports WMA and the iPod does not, the iPod supports Apple Lossless, Audible audio books, as well as Apple's Fairplay file types...and I contend that supporting the file type that 80% of legally downloaded music is in (Fairplay) is more important to the market than supporting the 20% (WMA).

      Why you want to bring beleagured Creative into this is beyond me but we can scrap over them for a minutes too.

      The Zen has followed the iPod step for step. You can point out that the Zen has a radio and the iPod has a radio accessory if you want, but I contend that I didn't buy a $300 music player to listen to Clear Channel's Britany Spears crap. Further, how convenient is it to manage a music collection of several thousand songs without the benefit of the click wheel? I couldn't imagine trying to get to "R.E.M" when starting in the "A's" with Microsoft or Creative's traditional up/down click keys (The Zune's keypad is circular, but it it still and up/down/left/right pad, not a scroll wheel).

      And so what the hell is so bad about an iPod or that it supports proprietary DRM? It doesn't make you convert MP3's to play on it. What the hell is Microsoft's DRM? It is proprietary too. Oh, you mean that Apple doesn't license Fairplay? Well then how in the hell is Motorolla selling cell phones that play Apple's Fairplay DRM protected songs? Certainly it couldn't be a license agreement could it?

      And finally, for the record, here is a list of supported file types:
      iPod: AAC, Protected AAC, MP3, MP3 VBR, Audible, Apple Lossless, AIFF and WAV
      Zune: MP3, AAC and WMA (unofficial)
      Creative Zen W: MP3, WMA, WAV

      Who the hell is incompatible now?

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    10. Re:Not enough for me by amichalo · · Score: 1

      I could say the opposite if I had more WMA+DRM media than AAC+DRM, although I would have better selection, since Microsoft is more openly licensing (read: 'is licensing') the WMA+DRM codecs than Apple is with AAC+DRM.

      iTunes and the Fariplay DRM account for 80% of the legal music market. Microsoft's WMA DRM accounts for 20%...so yeah, you "could say the opposite if.." but that isn't FREAKING REALITY.

      I'll ignor the FACT that Apple licensed Fairplay to Motorolla and just pretend I'm in your world.

      Further, I don't see how you have more "selection" by having multiple stores with the same content. The iTunes store has over 3 million songs and thousands of exclusive tracks.

      And finally, for the record, here is a list of supported file types:
      iPod : AAC, Protected AAC, MP3, MP3 VBR, Audible, Apple Lossless, AIFF and WAV
      Zune : MP3, AAC and WMA (unofficial)
      Creative Zen W : MP3, WMA, WAV

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    11. Re:Not enough for me by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I'll ignor the FACT that Apple licensed Fairplay to Motorolla and just pretend I'm in your world.

      Perhaps I'm wrong, but Microsoft's licensing for WMA+DRM is leaps and bounds more indiscriminate than Apple's licensing of FairPlay. Apple just wants to lock the content and sell the players, whereas Microsoft just wants to make the software. It's an ideological difference, but it does mean that you'll have more trouble finding anything other than an iPod to play AAC+DRM.

      Further, I don't see how you have more "selection" by having multiple stores with the same content. The iTunes store has over 3 million songs and thousands of exclusive tracks.

      I think you misread me-- I was referring to more selection of players. Still, though, the same would be true of outlets. Perhaps I want a better price or a different pricing structure. Perhaps the iPod, as a device, doesn't meet my needs in some way or another. If I'm invested in AAC+DRM, I'll practically have less latitude to switch players or providers than with WMA+DRM, and a whole lot less latitude than if I'm invested in MP3.

      And finally, for the record, here is a list of supported file types:
      iPod : AAC, Protected AAC, MP3, MP3 VBR, Audible, Apple Lossless, AIFF and WAV
      Zune : MP3, AAC and WMA (unofficial)
      Creative Zen W : MP3, WMA, WAV


      Venn diagram says... (( ding! )) MP3! (Hell, WMA even has more coverage in your diagram, and that's not taking into account the countless other players you haven't mentioned.)

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    12. Re:Not enough for me by amichalo · · Score: 1

      What exactly is your point? You have managed in two posts to misstate the facts of the market, and then turn your statement about "selection" of content into "selection" of players. For the record, if all devices played the same stuff, I would STILL choose and iPod because of the click wheel that is EXCLUSIVE to the iPod.

      You sum up your debacle with an obvious statement that non-DRM MP3 files are common to all players (I chose iPod, Zen, and Zune cause that is what we are discussing). To that, I simply say "DUH". Back before there was a DRM solution, iPods gained market tracking among MP3 players because they were better players! At that time, DRM adn DRM-lockin (a very real thing) wasn't an issue.

      I own an iPod because I think it is the best device and it comes from an innovative company so I won't have to be waiting around going "I wish my player did that" when cool features I want are avaialable on the iPod - features like a dock connector that gives me access to a HUGE multi-million dollar accessory market. Not just leather cases, but real accessories that offer real integration. Sure there will be accessory makers for other players...as there are today...but there won't be the huge market because it doesn't pay for an accessory maker to invest $$$ into R&D for a player with a tiny slice of the market.

      Look, do what you want, I'm just a guy on Slashdot, but don't base your decision on ignorant defiance of Apple, base it on something substantial.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  81. You might want to try an Cowon iAudio by Xiph1980 · · Score: 0

    I've got the iAudio M3L. Plays atleast for 24h continuously... I couldn't be bothered trying longer.
    You don't need any software at all. When you plug the device in, it recognises it as a harddrive. Runs on every OS and Computer aslong as it's got USB support. Throw some music on there and you're good to go. you can use software if you want, with the music library and all, but I've got my music nicely sorted in various directories, so I wouldn't know how a music library would be beneficial for me, but to each his own I guess :)
    The M3 supports, amongst others, OGG, FLAC, and the standards.
    It has a built-in FM radio, memo recorder recording to mp3 format, can record from any source thru jackplug straight on mp3 etc etc etc...
    See www.cowon.com for more info on these players.

    --
    Manuals are your last resort only
    1. Re:You might want to try an Cowon iAudio by Xiph1980 · · Score: 0

      hmmm.... was definately aiming for the preview button...
      Anyway, for me I needed it to run on any OS without installing software, where-ever I might end up, and I loved that FLAC playback, so I chose this M3L
      Don't exactly know what you want in a player, but besides this, you also might wanna look at the Philips one. I believe you don't need any software for that one either.
      Don't know about the rest anymore sadly. It's been a while since I bought this one and looked around at all the devices.
      Good luck in your search, and have fun with your new toy once you made your choice. ;)

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
  82. This is easy. by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A Microsoft player supporting H.264 and AAC?

    Microsoft is fighting a big battle AGAINST both formats with WMA Pro and VC-1. It makes little sense for them to release a player that supports them.

    If they didn't there would be plenty of people who would not consider a Zune because it would mean having to rerip large CD collections that are already in AAC format. Apple avoids this same thing by giving iTunes the ability to convert WMA files to AAC format. Microsoft's solution is better becuase you don't lose audio quality from transcoding to another lossy format.

    Supportting H.264 has to do with the video iPod having the same format/resolution. There are many programs available that will convert DVD's and other computer video file formats to mpeg or H.264 at the resolution the iPod can support. Microsoft can now make use directly from this work being done for the iPod's benefit instead of having start an uphill popularity effort to get others to write the apps on their own accord. They could release a utility themselves, but that might cause some legal snafus they don't want to get involved with about ripping DVD's.

    This is a good thing for consumers as it helps establish de facto standardized (non-proprietary) formats that can be used on a variety of players.
  83. Launched like Capricorn I by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    No street date, no pricing, no list of retailers, no public demos, no music store, no anything but photos and a press release. Whether they call it "launched" or not, Zune is still vaporware.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  84. perfect for the brown sound by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not the only color it's available but personally I applaud MS for releasing turd brown as an option. Now if they do a special "Ween Edition" turd brown - it'll be the perfect player to enjoy the brown sound on, especially if it has "Poop Ship Destroyer" engraved on it.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  85. you're fast by Xiph1980 · · Score: 0

    either that, or I'm a slow typer :P (one post down) :)

    --
    Manuals are your last resort only
  86. It has to be said... by lelitsch · · Score: 1

    It's old, not very funny, and has been beaten to death.
    But it is a Slashdot tradition, damnit!!!!

    Wireless.
    More space than a nomad.
    Cool.

  87. ween! by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Personally I think a limited edition Ween turd colored zune would be the perfect player to enjoy the brown sound on. They could bundle the album Pod as a poke at Apple.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  88. Not Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless? More space than a Nomad?

    Definately not lame!

  89. Beige Zune Player by plusser · · Score: 1

    Beige? Beige! The Player of choice for somebody like Tony Blackburn...

    OK Hipsters, I'll get my cool flares on and boogie on down to the disco in my Ford Capri...

    Your Zune Player has decided that it has lost the will to live, the battery will now explode in five seconds.

  90. Zune? by buddhahat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I forget, is Zune the door keeper or the key master?

    --
    ------ How can making people laugh lead to bad karma?
  91. Re:If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be.. by qyiet · · Score: 1

    If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be on Slashdot three times a day.
    They were going for the other side of the "coin".. hence the brown color. -Qyiet

  92. Re:Past Market History by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

    Seeing as most people don't replace the keyboards and mice they get with their computers, the PC manufacturers are by far the keyboard and mouse leaders.
    Microsoft may be the leader in selling keyboards and mice as keyboards and mice, I would expect that less and 10% of keyboards and mice in use are made my Microsoft.

  93. Seamless media shopping by ben+there... · · Score: 1
    It is yet to be shown that the Zune + Windows delivers a great user experience like the iPod + Mac. iTunes and its store make the whole process seamless.

    One significant feature of the Zune/Windows experience may be that you don't need to shop at only one store (iTMS). Amazon Unbox already has portable device features built into their video service. Others will likely spring up soon.

    Only one of those stores needs to have a seamless "Zune/store experience" for it to be a success.
  94. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wifi? More space than a Nomad? LAME!

  95. Another iPod? by ghostbar38 · · Score: 1

    Where's support for OGG?... I prefer something better than an iPod, if this guys innovate then they will winners, but this is a copy, and is coming too late.

    --
    ghostbar page.
  96. three times to listen by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    what garbage.. why bother?

    Besides, did microsoft get a special license for this from *all* music content copyright holders? If not, is still illegal.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  97. Re:Past Market History by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the OEM ones aren't going to show up on his sell-through data because they don't have a separate SKU.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  98. +5 Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about -5 ignorant. Not only have select people been beta testing the hardware, there are videos on the net (even linked from the article) of the Zune in action.

  99. Can I share normal MP3's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still prefer buying CD's and ripping them to buying on iTunes or similar because of the lack of DRM. If I have my large collection on un-DRMed mp3's, can I share them? Or will microsoft think I'm doing something naughty?

  100. Well--one good thing about the brown one is... by woohootoo · · Score: 1

    ...you don't have to worry about getting mugged for it.

  101. I had an editor once who did his resignation by bdwoolman · · Score: 1
    letter to a mutual 'tard of a boss as a Power Point presentation. I laughed until I cried when I saw it. That video had the same feel. Saw it when it came out but watched it again. Funny. Thanks.

    Can I also note that IMHO any kid who bought something called a 'Zune' will find himself in a living hell.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  102. Balmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Following the announcement Balmer was spotted, signing to his wife, "Zune Zune Zune, Let's go back to my room."

  103. It's not a question of revolution by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

    It's one of context.

    Zune doesn't have to be revolutionary to succeed (which is good for MS, 'cause it isn't).

    All it needs is to integrate a little better with the MS media household than Apple's product does. And that, I'm sure, it will do.

    Aside from having de facto market share in the desktop OS market, MS has two things going for Zune: XP/Vista Media Center, and Xbox 360. If Zune is seen as an extension of these, and not as some vain attack on the iPod, I think it stands to do quite well among the users who have already invested in other elements of the MS-based media system.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  104. Which OSs will it connect to? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    Will I be able to upload my MP3 collection from Linux, MacOS, or older versions of Windows?
    I know the creative players don't connect like a normal flash drive, which means you need to use special software to connect to the PC. This has ment that initially there was no way to connect creative players to Linux or Mac PCs.

  105. Paul Thurrott on Zune Song Sharing by jamrock · · Score: 1

    Dissed and dismissed (by Microsoft's Fanboy-in-Chief, no less) in the best comment so far on Zune's music sharing capability:

    "The gimmick appears to be wireless interaction with other Zune users. Since I expect there to be about six of these by the end of the year, this could be sort of a waste of time."

  106. What world do you live in? by twitter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Contrary to popular belief, most of the working world loves Microsoft.

    Fully qualified, that is most of the working world over the age of 50, who's employers are in the Fortune 100, who had a large portion of their 401k put in M$TF without their permission, who still get their news from the broadcast networks, all of those people, still think M$ will be here in ten years. They also hate their computers and know it's M$'s fault. Really. Even the least informed and most vested of long time computer users know that M$ is second rate. They only think M$ will be around because they are used to seeing big dumb companies beat the marketplace and the law. IBM and friends give them pause, because they know that IBM knows computer excellence.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:What world do you live in? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      God, you're fucking insane.

      "Everyone believes that Microsoft are assholes, even if they don't say so or actually believe that!"

      And how is it that everyone other than IBM is a "big dumb company"?

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:What world do you live in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, take your dollar signs and stick them up your arse. I cannot think of anything you could have done to make your opinion *more* pointless.

  107. Situation Normal ... by twitter · · Score: 0
    ... All Fouled Up.

    How will the brown Zune look with the blue screen of death?

    Natural.

    SNAFU, VISTA. Can you tell the difference? Six years to failure and counting. Zune, like previous M$ music services, will sink without a trace in short order.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  108. Competition is a good thing by plazman30 · · Score: 1

    Apple has a similar lock in to the digital music player, that Microosft has on the desktop. All peripherals work with iPods. Car manufacturers provide integarted ipod controls in their vehicles. And a LOT of people are using iTunes out there, which the Zune won't support because iTunes doesn't do WMA and any Microsoft DRM.

    Still, competition is good. I'm sure future iPods will have a wide screen and wifi built in. This will just cause Apple to have to innovate all the harder.

    Personally I don't see the Zune taking off, with so many other choices out there such as Creative, RCA, Samsung. Name brands like the Rio and the Zen are very well known names, but still don't sell as well as the iPod. And Microsoft is not known for it's outstanding consumer electronics. I could see people waiting to see what Sony's new MP3 player is going to be like, I don't know if anyone is going to patiently wait to see what Microsoft's MP3 player will be like.

    Andy

  109. Yeah but... by T3hFish · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but does it run linux?

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." -- Voltaire
  110. No, other failures are more appropriate here. by twitter · · Score: 0

    Just like the ipod was a complete and utter failure because it has DRM?

    No, Zune will sink just like the new Napster and other utterly forgetable M$ music services. In case you missed it, they sucked so bad that even no one wanted them, even after being forced to pay, despite M$'s OS advantage and prevalence of cheap, compatible players. DRM sucks, M$'s brand is the worst and people know it. A whoop-de-do wireless network that only shares temporarily with other Zunes will contribute to the well earned bad reputation.

    In fact, M$'s entry to the device market will hasten the demise of WMA. If M$ pulls it's usual strategy of "knifing the baby" or "cutting off their oxygen", both phrases from M$ emails, they will drive other device makers away from WMA. This will strengthen device maker support for less encumbered formats like mp3, ogg and flac.

    Contrary to popular belief, iTunes is not doing that much better. People still overwhelmingly purchase their music in forms that are not DRM encumbered. DRM is damage and people route around it.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  111. Another Microsoft "head-fake" by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    I'll bet all of Microsoft's partners who designed to the PlaysForSure standard are real happy about this. Microsoft lobbies all of them to adopt PlaysForSure because that's Microsoft's strategic direction and it's what everyone is going to be using... while Microsoft quietly develops their own product that goes off in a completely different direction.

    Remember when Microsoft was (successfully) getting everyone else to develop for OS/2 while they themselves were developing for Windows?

  112. It's a born failure... by ocifersven · · Score: 1

    For starters, no one will care that much. It's Microsoft. Microsoft is about as fresh and exciting as a slice of white bread with peanut butter spread on it. Mmmm... peanut butter.

    That's besides the point. By this time Zune has it's launch for the 2006 holiday season, Apple will most likely debut their new 16:9 6G iPod with larger storage capacities than 30GB, a touchless scroll wheel, etc. WiFi? Don't know, and honestly don't care enough ...yet.

    Reading Microsoft's press release was the most stale thing I could do. It was almost like Ben Stein wrote the damn thing. Though I give kudos to Microsoft for giving it a good try. Maybe I'll be wrong and iPod will lose that much momentum, and Microsoft will lead the pack. But I doubt it. If Microsoft gains anything by the launch of Zune, it's to witness the fall of Creative, Toshiba, Samsung, iRiver and the like in the portable music player market. But in order for them to have "the edge" on those other companies... they need to give the consumer something else they haven't seen yet. I say, put a toaster, a portable toothbrush, a Swiss Army knife, or even a small compartment for those poo-poo bags people have to carry around to clean up after their dog on a city walk. That, my friends, would give Microsoft the edge over the rest.

    The only reason I wouldn't want it, is the fact that in a year's time, my Zune will have to have 3 different Antivirus programs, and 4 spyware programs installed for using it via WiFi, filling up a quarter of it's total capacity. Just can't bring myself to do it.

  113. How many days after product launch will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any bets on how many days after the Zune hits store shelves until somebodies got a booting no-hardware-mod-neccessary variant of the linux kernel running on it? And how many days after that before we see a mini-distro with DRM rippers already installed? Any bets on when we'll see the first Zune specific virus that propogates via a buffer-overflow problem in the wireless card driver? Or WMF-style trojaned music? I can see it now.. someone comes up with a uber-mod that plugs into a laptop so you can overwrite that BoomCar's Zune with the "Chipmunks Sing Disney Classics - Polish Language Variant." Maybe if we're lucky it'll lock the volume control on maximum? Heck, I'd buy one and leave it on autoscan just for the sheer joy of frying speakers.

  114. what about support for .ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    anyone ever hard of ogg format? it's consumes less diskspace and has better quality sound than mp3, the downside is that no-one has ever heard of ogg and never gave it a try.. such a shame.

  115. Argyle, fuck yes! by typicallyterrific · · Score: 1

    Dude, are you kidding me?

    I *totally* would've gotten my Nano in argyle.
    That would've rocked!

  116. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  117. Can they never win ? by flyingace · · Score: 1

    Ok I am no m$ fan. I am the exact opposite most times.

    However I think M$ is doing a good thing by bringing the first legal large music sharing forum ( still mired by DRM I must admit), but this is a great first move.

    I cannot believe we have to knock them for everything.

    Just my 2 cents.

  118. hmm by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    just my personal opinion of course, but that thing looks pretty bad ass.. i think i'll buy one.. i think the mere trendiness of ipods is the whole reason i dont want the damn thing.. atleast with a Zune, I can still be a geek instead of a "cool guy" like Apple likes to portray in their commercials..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  119. No way. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people, even Apple fanboys, have mostly non DRMed MP3 in thei music players, legally obtained (ripping from CDs, but also increasingly from music stores and independent artists that are smalling the coffee, lik emusic).

    A player that would not recognize this reality would be dead at birth.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  120. Sharing by PAKnightPA · · Score: 1

    While I think the sharing could be nice if it works well the biggest problem with it is that sharing is only useful if alot of people actually get a Zune. After all what use is sharing if you have no one to share with. And it seems unlikely to me that Zune will be able to take a significant porportion of the market given the current dominance of the iPod so I dont see the sharing feature being a feature that would get much use...

  121. Brown headphones? by nandnor · · Score: 1

    Will they become teh r0x0rrz on the streets and in the subways? Is brown the new white? seriously.

  122. Marketing Dept. Strikes Again? by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    Zune? Zuuuuune? Who came up with that one? Were they so damn neurotic about branding lawsuits resulting from using some variant of tunes that they had to make up a word that rhymes with "tune". Microsoft Music Player would have 20 fold better than "Zuuuuune". "Hey dude, you enjoying your Zune- you tard!" With the money they got in the bank, my descendents are going put up with that company's lousy products for the next 200 years until they go out of business. God spare us all!

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  123. Quoth Chris Griffin: by acxr+is+wasted · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Brown's the color of poo." - Christopher Artemis Griffin

    --
    "Come on, let's go drink till we can't feel feelings anymore."
  124. Re:what about support for .ogg? by freedom_india · · Score: 1
    That's because ogg is not supported by handheld music players like iPod.

    Do you have a mod for the same?

    If not, just shut up and quit complaining.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  125. final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    final post!

    1. Re:final by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope

  126. importance of software user interface by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    the apple fanboys are just whining that microsoft did something right.

    Microsoft doing something right still has yet to be seen with this product. Apple established the iPod's dominance in the market from the get-go with a superior software interface. For those who can remember the Diamond Rio, the software for loading mp3s onto the devise was a major pain in the a$$ to use. It was like a 3 step process to simply copy some songs over. Apple made it drag-and-drop simple.

    With Microsoft's UI track record, I don't have high hopes for an elegant software interface.

    Seth

  127. Lots of answers here by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    First of all, Microsoft hasn't launched the Zune. They haven't even announced launch date yet! I'm surprised noone here has linked to this blog, which is from an employee Microsoft and answers (or at least postpones) some of the questions people are raising here at /.

    Including: battery life (not known yet), whether you can or not send a song you make with WiFi (yes, you can, but everything sent by wifi is protected by the 3 days/3 plays rule, because there's no way for them to know whether a song is copyrighted or not), and probably others.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  128. Hacking a ZUNE? by phelix_da_kat · · Score: 1
    On Gizmodo's interview with J Allard (of MS), he states: It's a tough problem, and we're not done with it yet. What we have is different power modes. Oversimplifying, we have a beacon mode that says "I'm around." The next level that uses more power says "hey, I want to do something, and share, whether that's music, photos." http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/features/giz-interv iew-j-allard-calls-ipod-the-pong-of-digital-audio- snap-200716.php

    So.. does that mean there could be a hack (or the user is stupid enough to let everyone "see" their files)?

    I mean is MS usually leaves all its ports open on its OSes, then by default that means your "beacon" is on to let everyone know you can be hacked!

  129. Very Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are predicting people aren't going to want to share the music on their personal music players with their friends.

    Even if that prediction turns out to be incorrect, which it seems so obvious to me now that you've said it, you are then saying that it will be useless because wireless technology is basically impossible.

    Fucking brilliant.

  130. Zune by davidmcg · · Score: 1

    Just wondering, does the Zune come pre-installed with spyware, virii etc or do we have to wait for an update?

  131. Re:If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be.. by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    Well, they named it Zune which lets it be on Slashdot three times in three days.

    --
    ^_^
  132. Supports != encourages by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of difference between a "supported format" and an easy-to-use, encouraged format. Microsoft can make it hell to use/buy mp3s, while still technically "supporting" them. If you and others buy into their system, and start using their proprietary formats which take away your rights, you can be assured that they'll do just that, if they haven't already. It's been the microsoft pattern for a very long time.

  133. todays youth is so dumb.!!!! by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    If they had a clue, they would pop in to google and find a torrent with 50000 ring tones in a zip file.

    Spend the money on booze instead kiddies.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  134. real people have friends. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, teenagers, esp girls, groups of 4-8 of them and lunch time, bingo share share , oh Lucy, listen to this new track, BEEEEEEM, zapo

    If your >40, then dude, todays youth is more wired on than you old timer.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:real people have friends. by msuzio · · Score: 1

      Right.

      Then Lucy gets pissed when three days/plays later the track she fell in love with that totally expresses her inner teen angst turmoil is gone.

      BEEEM, zapo rapidly turns into: "This sucks! Let's go shopping at the mall!"

      PS: I am armed constantly with 3-4 gadgets, depending on pocket space. I'll out-wired these little Paris Hilton clones any day :-P

  135. WOW man, 1980s features, ripper dude by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    CD players can do gapless, circa 1986 etc.. whenever...

    Its part of the spec, unless its burned in that way, ie, listen to dj mixes.

    ipod gapless is long over due, someone decided to think for more than 3 hrs to figure out how to do it, but
    go throught 17 forms and 6 managers before that feature request got approved and budget assigned. ;-)

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  136. Re:what about support for .ogg? by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

    You, my son, are in the wrong place if you think that no one here has ever heard of ogg vorbis. And, btw, there are lots of media players out there that support ogg vorbis, iRiver, samsung, cowan. Check out this baby.

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

  137. A real threat? by scuba964 · · Score: 1

    Apple - B&W and sweet colors
    MS - B&W and shit

  138. Facts are, this is sub-par by gatesvp · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, this machine is sub-par.

    It's like Vista. It has no killer features. It has few, if any compelling features. It does not have a compelling price point. The esthetics are poor-quality rip-off of a previous generation of iPod.

    This thing is not beautiful, it's not revolutionary and it has "worse than Apple" DRM written all over it. I mean, this is MS, they could've done something different something better. Instead, they've again decided to clone, and this one is going to cost them. It will be flop, they won't make any money, shareholders will be angry and team members will leave for jobs at Google.

    And there will be no wonder (from Slashdot at least) as to why the whole thing failed: Poor execution.

    Who remembers the UMPC (Ultra-Mobile PC). These things were supposed to have the power of a small laptop in a kit the size of a paperback and cost less than 1k. At least they get points for revolutionary thinking (size, thumb inputs), but then they suffer from Poor execution. The units cost much more than 1k. The two that lauched had average esthetics and poor design: one of the two had a flimsy stand, both had so-so battery life, ports were poorly laid out and important ones were missing (no video out?). The weren't light or terribly thin, so thumb-typing can be impossible for some. Plus, the size of the thumb buttons doesn't scale, so people with smaller thumbs couldn't ask the system to "make a smaller keyboard".

    The Zune has all of the makings of something even worse than the UMPC, and that's pretty bad.