Slashdot Mirror


New Sony DVDs Not Working In Some Players

An anonymous reader writes "It seems that the most recent DVDs released by Sony — specifically Stranger Than Fiction, Casino Royale, and The Pursuit of Happyness — have some kind of 'feature' that makes them unplayable on many DVD players. This doesn't appear to be covered by the major media yet, but this link to a discussion over at Amazon gives a flavor of the problems people are experiencing. A blogger called Sony and was told the problem is with the new copy protection scheme, and they do not intend to fix it. Sony says it's up to the manufacturers to update their hardware."

651 comments

  1. Gee. by Khaed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sony DRM pissing customers off. Why does that sound so familiar?

    1. Re:Gee. by celticryan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nothing new to see here people, keep moving...

    2. Re:Gee. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1, Interesting
      FTA:

      Would it not be a good idea to test changes you intend to make on your DVD's at least on your own equipment so that if you find a problem you could have the firmware update available instead of not only inconveniencing, but alienating your own customers.
      Hardware and DVDs are two entirely separate branches of Sony Corp.

      I think it's a little bit naive to expect one branch of a multi-national corporation to talk very well with another.

      Stuff like that happens all the time.
      Oh and TFA "was posted on Monday, March 19th, 2007 at 4:49 pm"
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Gee. by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

      And they keep coming back for more. Is this a Stockholm Syndrome* thing? "Pégame...pero no me dejes!"

      *TNX

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wonder if the new DRM's been successful at keeping those movies off the torrent sites. Because if the article's to be believed, it's certainly been successful at pissing off paying customers, and what would be the point of doing that if the movies were still being pirated anyway?

      Tickletaint (forced to post logged-out due to modbombing)

    5. Re:Gee. by Khaed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care how many branches there are. The DVD division ought to make sure their damn product plays.

      Making Grandma update the firmware on a DVD player just to make it take two minutes longer for a pirate to copy a DVD is stupid.

    6. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny, it didn't seem to take longer...

    7. Re:Gee. by lewp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's a little bit naive to expect one branch of a multi-national corporation to talk very well with another.

      When one branch of that multinational corporation is making discs specifically designed to play in another branch's hardware, then no, I don't think that's a little bit naive whatsoever. I don't expect the computer division to hit up the TV stand division about every little thing, but it seems like "we're making a new type of DVD, so let's call up the guys who make the DVD players and make sure nothing broke" is a thought that should have occured to someone.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    8. Re:Gee. by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      This isn't a branch communications issue, this is a "new product doesn't work to spec" issue. They made a new DVD. This DVD doesn't play in DVD players. Even if they were only selecting a few units as test cases, you'd think a Sony would be in the mix.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    9. Re:Gee. by sycomonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess he meant "to make it take two minutes longer for a pirate to copy a DVD first"

      --
      --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    10. Re:Gee. by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's a little bit naive to expect one branch of a multi-national corporation to talk very well with another.
      I think it's a little bit naive of you and Sony to think people will care about Sony's internal problems when people's shiny new Sony-branded products fail to function as advertised. If their stuff doesn't work, it isn't worth the money. Why that occurs is not my problem.
    11. Re:Gee. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (1) Buy DVD, stick it in DVD player, sit down w/ wife & kids to watch the movie - no joy.
      (2) Swap at store, still no joy. Try to return, get hit with restocking fee - take DVD home irate.
      (3) Call Sony to complain, get told to update player.
      (4) Call player manufacturer to complain, get told "sorry, we've no idea, your player is out of warranty, go away". Now you're broiling angry.
      (5) Discover software that rips the CD, despite whatever security measure on it, and burns it to a DVD-R.
      (6) Realize you can do the same thing with DVD-R images on the net, and start downloading.

      Congratulations, Sony, for having turned a customer over to the Dark Side with your wonderful customer relations program!

    12. Re:Gee. by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      mis communication between divisions of sony is the consumer's problem how? they fucked it up, they fix it.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    13. Re:Gee. by timmarhy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i just wish i had mod points for you. you hit the nail on the head

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    14. Re:Gee. by Mike89 · · Score: 1

      --Tickletaint (forced to post logged-out due to modbombing)
      Modbombing? All of your posts have been pointless and trolling. And, to further that, the URL in your sig simply logs people out of Wikipedia. What a shame your contributions aren't getting noticed!
    15. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're referring to this post--the one that triggered the modbombing--all I can say is: LEARN IRONY. Seriously, you literal-minded milksops are destroying the Slashdot I used to know and love.

      Tickletaint (forced to post logged-out due to modbombing)

    16. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes, I was tricked into logging out of Wikipedia and I can't take a joke! Cry me a fucking river.

    17. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it was just that... You forgot the "convenience" of:
      -having to get dressed according to weather
      -burn some expensive fossil fuels and put wear on an expensive car
      -wasting a half hour in city traffic getting cut all the time -- both ways
      -hunting for parking spots
      -walk around a store full of unhelpful minimum-wage/comission employees looking for what you want (hopefully you won't impulse buy anything you don't need in the process)
      -standing in line for a half hour to pay for it
      -find out it doesn't play on your computer either (unless you shell out money for something like AnyDVD)

      And possibly things like buying a new DVD player (more $) only to find out (if it even works at all) that there's unskippable previews and such crap (FBI warnings) on the disc too.

      Whereas using P2P I can download the thing in mere minutes. No DRM, no protection that prevents playing, no rootkits, no unskippable previews, no FBI warnings -- none of the usual crap. No need to waste time ripping/re-encoding it in mpeg4 to put it on my video server either.

      I would rather pay for a un-DRM'ed mpeg4 rip direct download then buy the DVD, but studios won't let us, much less for decent prices. Pirating is easy, fast (~30 seconds to start the transfer then downloads overnight), convenient and often provides you with a better product (at least an un-crippled one) -- and much cheaper too. As a bonus, you're not being treated like a thief by the pirated copy (oh the irony). So people pirate instead.

    18. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (7) Accidentally download a torrent from a server that tracks your IP.
      (8) Sony asks your ISP to give up your name for copy right infringement and they comply.
      (9) Get sued by the **AA just because some crappy movie wouldn't work.
      (10) Decide to fight it (go to 11a) or just pay the discount rate (go to 11b).
      (11a) Spend a lot of money on a prolonged trial regardless if you win or lose because the **AA will move to drop without prejudice if it looks like they may lose (You may never see the [/End]).
      (11b) Spend $2000 and prove you are guilty without them having any real evidence to prove so. If the **AA wishes, go to 11a.

    19. Re:Gee. by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is all a part of the Sony Customer Rage Assurance Program

      Sony CRAP, for short

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re:Gee. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously, you literal-minded milksops are destroying the Slashdot I used to know and love. Well, it's a tough job, but somebody's got to do it. And I, for one, have nothing better to do, though you might want to put some of the blame where it deservedly belongs ... squarely on the shoulders of Global Warming.
    21. Re:Gee. by Stripe7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is not functional and it is not the fault of your player. There should not be a restock fee. If there is SONY should be paying it not you. They are selling you defective merchandise.

    22. Re:Gee. by rikkards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it took me about 30 seconds to discover Ripit4me so I could backup Casino Royale and about 1.5 minutes to find a download that worked so yeah 2 minutes is about right.

    23. Re:Gee. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      You forgot the alternate (5):
      Rent movie at blockbuster and make copy if you want to keep it.

    24. Re:Gee. by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt it... I've been able to rip both Stranger Than Fiction and Casino Royale with no problems using the latest beta release of MacTheRipper in "Feature Only" mode. My guess is the new scheme is meant to prevent casual ripping rather than reduce downloads.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    25. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of my roommates bought Casino Royale. To test it, I just grabbed it and ripped it in DVDFab Decrypter (XP inside of VMWare, with a Linux host). It ripped perfectly, including all extras.

      Just out of spite I went ahead and ran DVD Shrink on the rip. I'll probably burn a few copies and leave them various places on my way to work tomorrow.

    26. Re:Gee. by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So here is the new response to the MPAA letters?
      Might actually stand up in court (at least for the title(s) involved)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    27. Re:Gee. by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      Sony DRM pissing customers off. What do you seem so surprised about?

    28. Re:Gee. by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      oh btw just to prevent folks from using tinyurl as a logic bomb visit http://tinyurl.com/preview.php to enable a "safe mode". This page allows you to grab a cookie that shows you the url before you go to the url (useful for oh affilate urls friends of The GOAT and other funky things)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    29. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had troubles ripping it at first but then I switched to a different Made in China application and it worked fine. Never had any trouble just playing the disc either...

    30. Re:Gee. by mythar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think Sony did this by accident? ha ha!

    31. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I like to be anally fisted.

      Tickletaint (forced to post logged-out due to modbombing)

    32. Re:Gee. by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Do these new discs play on all Sony DVD players?
      Will Sony offer firmware for all their affected players?

      My guess is the answers are no and no.

      I love how all tech companies that marched the DRM and anti-copy planks are steadily aiming to shoot their own feet... a few more years of this and we'll be liberated from the stupidity. Of course, I wish we had never had to go through this in the first place but now, all we can do is find ways to make it blow up in their faces on a colossal scale sooner than later.

    33. Re:Gee. by throx · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've never been hit with a restocking fee for a defective DVD or game. Typically to avoid trouble I've just accepted store credit but complaining that something doesn't work at all will get you an immediate exchange/credit.

      Restocking only comes into play if you change your mind.

      --

      Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

    34. Re:Gee. by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sony...like no other

    35. Re:Gee. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In which case the guy DEFINITELY won't be buying any more DVDs, since he won't be able to afford them.

    36. Re:Gee. by sabernet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup. All part of their plan to scrap DVD players in favor of more costly Blu-Rays.

    37. Re:Gee. by Ledsock · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed. When it didn't work for me, I just launched DVDFab Decrypter, temporarily copied it to my computer, and it played perfectly. Ironic that the only way I could watch a movie I had legally rented was to illegally copy it.

      --
      What is mankind really? Well, it's just two words put together Mank, and ind.
    38. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (11c) spend $100 on a saturday night special and box of ammo and blow a few RIAA lawyer's brains out.

    39. Re:Gee. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      bingo...

      This new encryption started sometime around october/november... I believe it was mentioned here before. I know I had an issue with "Butterfly Effect 2" and did most of the steps you stated... The DVD shut down the player so I took it back to the store as defective; then when it didn't work a second time I dispensed with calling manufactuers because my player was 2+ years old. So I ended up Using DVD-Rip from Automatix and then watching the movie on the PC. An asside is that at Christmas I had to rip and reburn a CD because it wasn't "compatible" with the car's stock CD player. I finally did break down with the latest round of movies and got a new upsampling player just for fun... but it still feels "dirty".

      Like you said, these guys are making enemies of the common people... my wife and sister thought DVD/CD ripping was silly up until disc stopped working on the stuff we already had. Now they're getting used to ripped DVD's online video, and iPods to cart stuff around the house or so the kids can watch it later.

    40. Re:Gee. by binford2k · · Score: 1

      an asside?

    41. Re:Gee. by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 1

      "Add Open Season" and "Running with Scissors" to Sony's "so safe against copying its no longer a real DVD" list (the attempt at copy protection is in the file system). Both failed to load on a 3 year old Toshiba DVD player, which otherwise plays DVD, CD, VCD, and MP3 formats without problem. On the PC side, MPlayer and Kaffiene both tried to play the disks, but had serious display problems.

      This leaves me as an (1) honest consumer locked out purchasing or renting Sony distributed movies. That is not really my loss as most of my rentals are movies that were not nearly good enough to see in a theater. Its just an additional step I rent movies. Now I have to also look for the distributor.

      Their junk "copy protection" prevents the disk from being played on a legitimate DVD player, and only mildly inconveniences someone making a copy. Someone using a disk copier would not be slowed down at all.

      When I took "Running with Scissors" went back to the store, with a complaint and for a refund, the manager was not surprised, and knew of many other titles that would have the same problem.

      Sony was once a cool company, when they were mainly hardware I guess. It seems like since their merger with BMG that they really started to suck.

      (1) Unless it is a DVD that I have purchased, I will not copy it. If it is a DVD that I have purchased, a copy is made for general usage with the original being the safe copy.

      --
      "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
    42. Re:Gee. by StarkRG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, it was easier for me to crack Windows Genuine Advantage then it was to call up MS and get them to reactivate the license key printed on my sticker...

      It's pretty well known that anti-piracy stuff doesn't stop pirates, it simply stops regular users. Great job guys, just wonderful. Now, if only someone like you was in power to be able to bring peace to the Middle East! Oh yeah, never mind.

    43. Re:Gee. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but $2000 would buy at least a hundred DVDs. Maybe even a hundred non-working DVDs--and no sane person would buy that many non-working DVDs.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    44. Re:Gee. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      No, the new discs don't play on all Sony DVD players. It appears that Sony's DVD players actually have more problems with them than some other brands.
      Sony claims that they will fix their affected players. The question is, when?
      Maybe they're hoping that fans of Sony movies will think it's the player that's broken and update to Blu-Ray. Anyone test if off-the-shelf DVDs of those films play in Blu-Ray players yet? (I imagine that Sony films can come in Blu-Ray format, so...)

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    45. Re:Gee. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I think it's a little bit naive to expect one branch of a multi-national corporation to talk very well with another.

      I think that if two branches of a multi-national corporation want to be branded together, they better make sure they play together. There is nothing naive about expecting that, it is the exact expectation created by this branding.

    46. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that Sony's DVD players actually have more problems with them than some other brands.

      Actually, Sony players always have more problems playing nonstandard DVDs than cheap chinese ones.
      That is why you should not buy a Sony player.

    47. Re:Gee. by MoHaG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I found it necessary to decrypt a rental DVD to play a it on my computer. It kept complaining about enabled YV out.

      Bypassing copy protection should never be the only way to access protected content....

    48. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never posted in my life...but Sony have gone to far this time and I need to vent...I will never willingly buy a Sony product again...

    49. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waitaminute....

      AnyDVD costs money? I guess that's the sweet, sweet irony of it all...

    50. Re:Gee. by dj.short · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know it seems to me that if you're in physical possession of a DVD, then it's not illegal to rip it to your computer... Making copies of DVD's isn't illegal, distributing them is.

    51. Re:Gee. by ArcCoyote · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is hilarious.

      Not only does Sony manage to fubar these discs so badly you can't play them on standalone players, but if you can rip it with DVDFab, that's not saying much for this new scheme. You usually need to wait for AnyDVD updates before you can rip new types of CP.

    52. Re:Gee. by BJH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Might want to recheck the Digital Millenium Copyright Act if you're living in the States - deliberately breaching copyright protections such as exist on DVDs is indeed illegal.

    53. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off and finish eating your dad's cum from your grandmother's rotted cunt.

      I am sooo turned on right now.

      Thanks.

    54. Re:Gee. by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

      Making copies of DVD's isn't illegal You live outside United States soil, right? HOw is the immigration policy where you live?
    55. Re:Gee. by pla · · Score: 1

      Might want to recheck the Digital Millenium Copyright Act if you're living in the States - deliberately breaching copyright protections such as exist on DVDs is indeed illegal.

      What copy protections? I just fire up RipIt4Me, and a few minutes later, I have a "repaired" DVD ready to burn. Don' no nuthin' 'bout no "copy protections".

      I do, however, consider it somewhat sad when we need to hope the "interoperability" clause of the DMCA applies to playing the damned things on the intended hardware.

    56. Re:Gee. by RancidMilk · · Score: 1

      I had to hook up my computer and play it with PowerDVD and output the display to my TV. Wouldn't even play in my Sony DVD player. Mother-F*$*@#%(%#$@%

    57. Re:Gee. by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      and lets not forget

      -being mugged on the way to the store -getting run over crossing the road -developing a brain haemorrhage, but not realising -when you get home being so angry that your brain explodes -pooing your pants

      and any of number of horrible things that have fuck all to do with having a defective DVD, just like in your list.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    58. Re:Gee. by gerrysteele · · Score: 1

      Out of interest what was the movie?

    59. Re:Gee. by stewwy · · Score: 1

      Glad I saw this , I was just on my way out to buy 'casino royal'

      but now I'm off to piratebay instead, way to go sony

    60. Re:Gee. by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=230535&cid=187 12593

      Discs that won't work with players... well my comment was about encryption keys but but this is just as bad!

      Sony are selling DVDs that (probably) carry the DVD logo which implies compatibility with the DVD standard. If they have new copy protection they are violating that obviously and should have their ass sued off.

      Can anyone say "class action"? This happened before with their CDs and their malware.

      Now they're fritzing the DVD players so you can't watch your movie. Does anyone think this is kind of a "make em buy it, it won't play, they'll need to pay for a new player or firmware update, profit" scamario?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    61. Re:Gee. by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Global warming? Won't somebody, please, blame the children?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    62. Re:Gee. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      And people wonder why so many of us geeks support HD-DVD over Blu-ray and the 360 over the PS3? *THIS* is why. This is, once again, the true face of Sony.

      And if you think this is bad, keep in mind that they are doing this with a format they DON'T control (DVD). Just imagine what they have planned for Blu-ray (which they DO control), if they win the format war.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    63. Re:Gee. by slash-tard · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight:

      1) People use computers to pirate dvds.

      2) People use consumer DVD players to watch DVDs.

      This sony fix only stops #2 on selected players?

    64. Re:Gee. by GooberToo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Swap at store, still no joy. Try to return, get hit with restocking fee - take DVD home irate.

      Do a charge back. Being charged for a product which fraudulently claims to be compatible with an industry standard (DVD) is fraud. Expecting you to pay fees associated with that fraud is fraud. The credit card issuer will more than likely understand that and issue the chargeback. If the store needs money to cover their restocking fee, they need to contact the manufacturer for producing a defective product. The problem exists between the retail outlet and the manufacturer and not between the retail outlet and the customer.

      Best of all, performing a chargeback is a great way for the retail stores to feel the pressure and pass it on to the manufacturer. Surprisingly, merchant associations have fairly heavy clout when they pull in the same direction. Try to make it work for you instead of against you.

    65. Re:Gee. by Zo0ok · · Score: 1
      I would rather pay for a un-DRM'ed mpeg4 rip direct download then buy the DVD

      I seriously believe that if they (Media Industry) put up their own BitTorrent search engine and their own BitTorrent-tracker, and seeded their own content, people (like you and me) would pay for it.

      You would pay for the "torrent file", which in this case would be copyrighted.

      I also seriously believe this will never ever happen ;)

    66. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the genius of disc DRM - the rippers bypass it easily while the paying customers can't watch it.

      I'm slightly surprised that the incredible disaster of CD DRM hasn't actually resulted in Sony learning anything.

      If anyone from Sony is reading, this is what happens when a customer buys a disc with DRM that renders it unplayable. Joe Sixpack simply returns the disc. A N Other Slashdoteer rips the disc and then returns it. Joe Sixpack then uses BitTorrent to download the rip made by A N Other Slashdoteer. Mr Slashdoteer thinks twice about buying another disc, as does Joe Sixpack.

    67. Re:Gee. by An0maly · · Score: 1

      Parents came to visit last weekend. brought Casino Royale to watch. wouldn't play in my mac that i use as a media center. had to use fab decrypter (after getting newest version) to rip it and reburn it. way to go. blocked legitimate usage and forced me to "violate the dmca" to be able to use it.

      --
      "...if you don't like your job, you don't strike. You just go in every day and do it really half-assed..." -Homer
    68. Re:Gee. by RancidMilk · · Score: 1

      Pursuit of Happyness

    69. Re:Gee. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Making copies of DVD's isn't illegal
      You live outside United States soil, right? HOw is the immigration policy where you live?
      Hey, don't forget to ask about their extradition policy too.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    70. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering I had the same problem with "Stranger than Fiction" on a new Sony DVP-CX995V 400 Disc DVD Changer, they can't even produce DVD's that run on their own equipment.

    71. Re:Gee. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I still have my Newton 2100. Suite!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    72. Re:Gee. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hardware and DVDs are two entirely separate branches of Sony Corp.

      If they want me to believe that they're two different companies, they're at least going to have to use two different names. But that doesn't seem to be necessary to fool you.

      In the end, it's the same giant, uncaring conglomerate above all of them that pays the piper and thus calls the tune. Or to mix musical metaphors, they're all dancing to the beat of corporate's drum.

      The issue here isn't that a Sony DVD won't play in a Sony DVD Player. The issue is that a Sony DVD won't play in most DVD players, because it [ostensibly] does not conform to the DVD specification.

      As such, it doesn't matter whose players they should have tested it on; they broke the spec. And they did it on purpose.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:Gee. by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      I just rented that DVD 2 weeks ago. Played fine in my DVD player. Its a combo VHS+DVD system. Not sure of the brand. Of course I just installed DVD playback software on my myth box, so the DVD player will be moving to the bedroom. So not sure how widespread the new copy stuff is. I am in North Hollywood California and I rented the movie from Hollywood Video in Noho.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    74. Re:Gee. by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Sony's players have a marked tendency to be extremely picky about the DVDs' physical condition, I suppose this could be viewed as Sony's way of sharing the frustrating playback experience with a wider audience.

      As for the 'question of when', I suspect an ETA of never for most of their affected players... and even for the devices they do release firmware updates for, only a minority of people will know about the updates' existence and how to apply them.

    75. Re:Gee. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's not hard to bypass either....

      1) Rip Movie to Hard Drive using DVDFab Decrypter
      2) Run those files through FixVTS
      3) then process with Shrink as you normally would

      Oh and the next release of anyDVD will get past it without effort.

      Sony is wasting their time trying these "copy protection" schemes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    76. Re:Gee. by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that buying (or even renting, but only for a short period of time) the disk means that playback ability is a permission directly given (by implication) from the copyright holder, and that any means necessary to carry out that action is 100% legal, and is intended use, or at the very least would fall under "fair use". And I'm also pretty sure that you could get just about any judge and/or jury to go along with that line of reasoning if the studio pressed their luck in court.

    77. Re:Gee. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I found it necessary to decrypt a rental DVD to play a it on my computer. "

      I think this same protection 'feature' is on the Pirates of the Caribbean 2 dvd I was trying to backup.

      Has anyone found a linux way around this yet? I've not been able to find anything so far on my research.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    78. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ps. first post. :)

    79. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I was unable to play the PoC:DMC DVD I got from NetFlix - it would crash every time I started the movie. So, I put the movie back in it's envelope and hit thepiratebay, and got a copy I could watch there. Sorry Sony, DRM is not saving you money, it's driving people to just say "Arr!"

    80. Re:Gee. by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Actually it is your problem. If you'd like to admit it or not its the truth. These devices have to be upgradeable in order to support a moving standard that can invalidate its current form with future updates. That is what all new player formats are telling you to buy into. If you are unaware or incapable to update your firmware, you are not using the hardware as intended and things will no longer work as intended. If firmware updates are too complicated for the early adopters being hit with the issue, then the HD formats will fail. I don't own an HD player so I don't know how they describe updating the firmware to customers. Maybe it is really confusing and maybe its never even mentioned. That would be a mistake with the implementing vendor, not the content distributor for supporting the latest iteration of the standard.

      If you don't like how the new DRM systems work you always have the choice to:
        - Do what the rest of Slashdot seems to be doing and pirate them (which solves nothing but your own greed)
        - Write letters to demand HD protections to be removed and boycott until that time
        - Do some other daring way to get your message through to the GENERAL populace
        - Come up with a way so that studios can make money off their properties and still allow you your fair rights

      I hear way too much bitching and whining on Slashdot about how the content providers are making defective by design products. I'm angry because I've never heard a single viable solution that will allow these people to make money while appeasing those that want absolute freedom of use in their products. If you want to blame someone, blame the internet. It is so ubiquitous that piracy becomes so large scale that millions of copies could be reproduced off a single source. At least back in the old days of piracy, the pirate (who had to supply media) generally had a small umbrella of people to sell their wares too. I don't like DRM and I wish it was a dead as the next person, but until someone finds a way for content creators to get paid, I think *gulp* it should remain in place.

      --
      Bye!
    81. Re:Gee. by Eccles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mr Slashdoteer thinks twice about buying another disc, as does Joe Sixpack.

      Absolutely. I've been good about not making illegal copies, I haven't subscribed to Netflix and done the copy-and-return bit, I haven't copied DVDs I've rented or borrowed from the library, etc. I have occasionally made copies of discs I legally own either because the disc is flaky or I needed an MPEG for in-car watching on a notebook PC.

      But each time these bozos come up with an ever-more-stupid scheme like this, I question why I bother. If they don't respect me...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    82. Re:Gee. by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the credit card companies would let people get away with chargebacks...

    83. Re:Gee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You crap your pants? I knew it!

    84. Re:Gee. by Hierarch · · Score: 1

      Shall we take this comment to mean that you're volunteering to be the courtroom test case? To shell out tens of thousands of dollars to stand up for your rights and the rights of us all?

      We all appreciate your sacrifice, hero.

      Just because there's a legal defense doesn't mean we want to invoke it. I know I don't.

      --
      --Somebody infect me with a .sig virus, I'm too lazy to write my own!
  2. Xine by normuser · · Score: 2

    Xine + libdvdcss + elcheapo drive = no problems.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    XXX#######
    1. Re:Xine by Core-Dump · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Torrent + living in the Netherlands + DVD writer = no problem (and legal)

      --
      What would you do without a monitor? Sit and look stupid behind a keyboard and a mouse
    2. Re:Xine by oldguy62 · · Score: 1

      AnyDVD>CloneDVD2>Third large by huge HDD in mediacenter HTPC
      who needs optical disks

      OOP's another full harddrive, that makes 1.5 terabytes, time for another 500GB drive

      Yes I know it's windows----it's still a windows kind of world for now

    3. Re:Xine by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Without a computer?

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Xine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the motherboard, power supply, case, ram, cables, hard drive, soundcard, speakers, processor, heatsink+fan, video card, monitor, keyboard, mouse, OS, Drivers, and electricity were understood to be present.

    5. Re:Xine by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Really , it's still illegal here (Belgium ). even though I have to pay copyright on every CD-R/DVD-R i buy to put linux distros on ( that's the only reason i use them , portable hard drives are much more usefull )

    6. Re:Xine by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I rented Casino Royale and Pursuit of Happiness (from netflix) and neither would play in my LG DVD player (LG DVT-418), so I ended up playing them on my Mythtv Box using xine.

      I filed the 'trouble report' with netflix saying selecting the 'unplayable' option as they didnt have a 'Fucken Sony DRM' option.

    7. Re:Xine by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did you report the dvd's as defective? It should be plan that if they do not play in a stand alone dvd when all other dvds to that they are defective. When you rent/buy these disk and they do not work simply return them as defective. Once walmart gets a stack of these fucker a mile high they will smack down sony nice and good.

      As evil as walmart is sometimes being the 10,000 pound gorilla does have it's uses.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    8. Re:Xine by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      >>> Did you report the dvd's as defective?

      Yep, All of them. I haven't purchased a DVD in a while, and these were ones I rented. (2 from netflix, and one from Blockbuster that I took back and got a replacement which still didnt work --- before we were Netflix members). With Blockbuster I told them that the disks wouldn't play and that I wasnt happy. I even told them that I'd be getting my movies from Netflix from now on. With the netflix movies, I filed the 'defective disk' or whatever the netflix option has... I figure if other people do the same, the trend will show.

      If blockbuster and netflix both complain to Sony, things might change.

    9. Re:Xine by bigbigbison · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complaining to Wal-Mart is exactly the right thing. Piss off a few consumers and they will just ignore it. Piss off Wal-Mart and the movie companies will listen.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    10. Re:Xine by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Was just curious... would it still be illegal to download a copy of one of these movies after discovering that the purchased DVD didn't work in your player? What I mean is, say I buy the DVD at the store, discover it doesn't work, can I choose to keep the DVD and download a copy of the unprotected movie off the 'net?

    11. Re:Xine by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      you shouldn't have to complain to walmart. you should have the law on your side, and the law should be the 10,000 pound gorilla in these cases.

    12. Re:Xine by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Torrent + living in the Netherlands + DVD writer = no problem (and legal)
      Usenet over SSL from provider which does not log anything + living in America + 1TB RAID1 = no problem (and illegal but don't give a fuck)
    13. Re:Xine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. Never piss them off. Especially if they are the top Fortune500 company (URL:http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortun e500/2007/index.html?cnn=yes).

    14. Re:Xine by .tekrox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Law should be yes, but Sony isn't going to listen to the law...

      What Sony will listen to - is if Walmart, etc Say: Remove to Copy Protection that causing us to lose sales - Or we'll stop selling your DVDs.
      This is the point that is being made - Big Business is about Money - and lots of it. Not the Consumer; Big Business could care less about the consumer.

      Only Small Business cares for the consumer, sometimes because they like to, sometimes because they have to they garner sales.
      When small business' gets Bigger, its starts to lose consumer focus - and starts focusing on money, and then once a company is public - they don't care about money so much either - they care about shareholders - because shareholders care about money, and they vote weather Mr. CEO and Board Members get to keep their (Very Highly Paid..) jobs or not.

    15. Re:Xine by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      True. Sony isn't going to listen to the law, even after getting spanked by the law the last time they did this. Maybe, just maybe, we can get "the law" to show Sony's habitual behavior and go for treble damages and a huge punitive awards this time. The only way to get companies to listen is huge lawsuits. It can't be a few million or even a hundred mil. It's got to be well over a billion, and force Sony to agree to never, ever do this again. Anything less is pocket lint to them.

    16. Re:Xine by tepples · · Score: 1

      I thought the motherboard, power supply, case, ram, cables, hard drive, soundcard, speakers, processor, heatsink+fan, video card, monitor, keyboard, mouse, OS, Drivers, and electricity were understood to be present. But if the only "motherboard, power supply, case, ram, cables, ..., soundcard, speakers, processor, heatsink+fan, video card, ..., OS, Drivers" are the DVD player, and the only "keyboard, mouse" is a DVD remote control, and the only "monitor" is a TV, now what?
    17. Re:Xine by toleraen · · Score: 1

      If blockbuster and netflix both complain to Sony, things might change.

      I could be wrong, but I think irritating rental stores would make Sony happy. I realize that both companies purchase a load of movies, but with each rental Sony is losing out a potential DVD purchase. I'm pretty sure Sony would love to see Blockbuster and Netflix crash and burn as much as I'd like to see Sony to do the same.

    18. Re:Xine by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Good point, I hadn't thought of it that way.

      Although, there are quite a few movies that I'd like to watch but would never buy. If there was no blockbuster/netflix I'd probably switch to piracy. I don't mind paying to see a trashy movie, but I certainly don't want it filling up space in my living room.

  3. Class action lawsuit anyone? by scubamage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just thinking about it, if they're selling them using the DVD label identifying it as a dvd, doesn't it legally have to be playable in dvd compatible players? If it wasn't, wouldn't that be a bait and switch scam? Just saying, they may have just opened up the floodgates to yet another massive lawsuit.

    1. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The music studios got in trouble with Phillips on that score: they were told flatly that if it doesn't conform to the published spec they can't use any relevant tradmarks, call it a Compact Disc, use the CD logo, etc. But given how the DVD industry is structured, I doubt much will come of this.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They may have found a way to fully comply with the DVD specifications while at the same time taking advantage of a flaw to implement copy protection of sorts.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're assuming that the Sony's DVD does not conform to the DVD specifications, when in fact it could be a number of DVD players which are out of compliance. It may also be that the specs have ambiguities, such that both the DVDs and the players conform, but simply don't work together.

      As for the DVD label, whatever entity licenses the use of the "DVD" logo probably dictates what that logo is supposed to mean. It doesn't mean that all DVD-labeled discs will work in all DVD-labeled players, the most obvious example being the case of region-specific discs and players. Sony's DRM scheme may be another area where they permit incompatibility between hardware and media.

    4. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DRM scheme almost certainly takes advantage of bugs in DVD player software that don't match the specs properly. That will include some pirate player software, but it also includes some of Sony's own DVD players, which apparently also contain implementation bugs. It seems they didn't do much testing.

      D'oh!

      Ridiculously, the people who are targeted by this DRM (pirates) are the people least affected by it. Firstly, it only takes one person to rip the DVD and put it on ExampleTorrentSite. Secondly, the pirates can patch their player software very easily.

      Sony, of course, can't patch their player software easily. It's in a Flash chip within each customer's house. I hope that Sony will issue all those customers with a complimentary new DVD player in short order.

    5. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by digitig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The music studios got in trouble with Phillips on that score: they were told flatly that if it doesn't conform to the published spec they can't use any relevant tradmarks, call it a Compact Disc, use the CD logo, etc. Yes -- and when did you last see any of those things on what-looks-like-a-CD packaging? Hereabouts it all seemed to vanish from the packaging at about the time Philips made that clampdown.
      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    6. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by TekPolitik · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just thinking about it, if they're selling them using the DVD label identifying it as a dvd, doesn't it legally have to be playable in dvd compatible players?

      This will depend very much on the local laws. In Australia a DVD that fails to play in a significant number of DVD players meets the statutory definition of unmerchantability, which requires goods to be suitable for every purpose for which they are normally bought (unlike other places where they have to be suitable for just one of the purposes for which they are normally bought). This will give the consumer the right to a refund, but won't lead to any penalty. There is also an argument that applying the label "DVD" to the product (or even selling it in a manner that makes it seem like it is a DVD) is misleading conduct for which anybody could apply to the Federal Court to get an injunction to prevent the product from being sold in that way.

    7. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This will depend very much on the local laws. In Australia a DVD that fails to play in a significant number of DVD players meets the statutory definition of unmerchantability, which requires goods to be suitable for every purpose for which they are normally bought (unlike other places where they have to be suitable for just one of the purposes for which they are normally bought). This will give the consumer the right to a refund, but won't lead to any penalty.

      The US is similar, there is an implied warranty that items will work for the purpose there sold.

      Of course, I think a more effective solution is to return enough to major vendors such as Wal Mart to get them to slap Sony upside the wallet.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    8. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that sure showed 'em.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the DVD Video standard has the equivalent of Java included with it, so it's like the web browser compatibility issues that occur continually: yes, the page had proper code, but it used some obscure aspect that the browser implemented incorrectly. Too bad all DVD players don't include a mode similar to a CD player, where you can play every damn track without any menus, just the track skip buttons. That's why it's so much more black and white with a CD player; either the disc is correct and will work on every CD player, or it's not and may not work.

    10. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Just as good but you can actually influence it. go to store and buy DVD, take it back opened and say it doesn't want to play on your DVD player that plays others well, get an exchange, repeat processes. ??? profit?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    11. Re:Class action lawsuit anyone? by jimicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Australia a DVD that fails to play in a significant number of DVD players meets the statutory definition of unmerchantability, which requires goods to be suitable for every purpose for which they are normally bought (unlike other places where they have to be suitable for just one of the purposes for which they are normally bought).

      What purpose other than "to watch in my DVD player" would normally be applied to a video DVD?

      If it doesn't work in my DVD player yet every other disk I own does - along with a number of other new ones purchased at the same time - it's perfectly reasonable for me to conclude that the disk is broken and demand a replacement. If several replacements don't work - must have been a bad batch at the factory. The folk on minimum wage or very near it at my local record store aren't likely to be experts on Sony's copy protection, and it's totally unreasonable for them to expect their customers to be.

  4. Works For Me by thesaint05 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a Pioneer DVD player, maybe second generation. The thing is huge, and probably something like 8 years old. Casino Royale works just fine in it. Granted, that sucker will play just about anything you throw in there, from DivX to DVD +/- RW. Best DVD player I ever bought, and one of the reasons why I still only buy Pioneer DVD players. Makes you wonder about what's in some of the other newer DVD players if my old one can play Casino Royale with no problems...?

    1. Re:Works For Me by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's what I was thinking as well. I wouldn't be surprised if the Sony reps didn't lead him down the wrong road.

      Reading the comments at Amazon and the blog, it sounds like it's just certain NEW models of players that aren't working. So instead of saying "It's our new copy protection and we won't fix it, but you can update your machine,' they should have said, "There's a bug in these models of players and they need a PATCH, which we are working on."

      I guess they need to tell the truth (hah hah hah) but it seems unlikely that it could be the players and not the disks.

      However, I guess if it's a relatively SMALL set of disks that have problems on these players....

      I don't know. I still vote that there's nothing changed about the DISKs, and it's just a flaw with the devices.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    2. Re:Works For Me by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      IINM, it IS the discs - with Sony's ARccOS protection.

    3. Re:Works For Me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I have an old Apex model that I'll never get rid of for the same reason (it's the one that has the hidden menu that allows you to turn off all the protection features, including Macrovision on the analog outs.) Even plays discs full of MP3s, which was pretty impressive eight years ago. And yeah, the thing is huge by modern standards, that's for sure, but it's built like a brick outhouse. Of course, that was back before Apex went to crap like most Chinese brands seem to, eventually.

      I had read about the hidden menu in an online article the night before I went to Circuit City to buy it. I took it home and it worked like a charm, even made some perfect VHS recordings just to prove I could do it. I then read that the MPAA had threatened Apex with termination of their DVD license if they didn't remove that menu. The very next day the new ones with the "fixed" firmware arrived: I know because my old supervisor tried to get one but none of the ones they had available had the hidden feature anymore.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a laptop and those titles do *not* work for me. Initially, I was mad as hell and got blockbuster to swap the discs over three times in one day. They seemed to think it was DVD driver problems, but it turns out that there is new copy protection software on the DVDs that prevent it being view by computers.

      You can get something called AnyDVD that strips the protection mechanism from the DVD. After that, the disc works fine.

    5. Re:Works For Me by drdanny_orig · · Score: 1

      I have a similarly ancient Sony player, one which balks at a lot of discs -- won't play >4X DVD+Rs, won't play DVD+/-RWs, won't play PAL format, nor DivX, etc -- but it had no problems with Casino Royale. There's something someone's not telling us.

      --
      .nosig
    6. Re:Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please stop using obscure and useless acronyms.
      If I'm Not Mistaken... How hard was that? huh?

      BRB/TYT/LOL/etc. were useful at a time when we had to "pay" for being online by the hour (or the minute for some) and had 10 private chat windows open, 5 IRC channels, etc.

      Did typing IINM save you anything? A couple of keystrokes? Is it that widely used?

      No, it doesn't make you look/sound smarter, because there are a LOT of acronyms that are just plain dumb.

      Sorry for going off, I didn't mean to shoot directly at you, just the whole acronym thing is driving me up a wall.

    7. Re:Works For Me by badasscat · · Score: 1

      I have an old Apex model that I'll never get rid of for the same reason (it's the one that has the hidden menu that allows you to turn off all the protection features, including Macrovision on the analog outs.) Even plays discs full of MP3s, which was pretty impressive eight years ago. And yeah, the thing is huge by modern standards, that's for sure, but it's built like a brick outhouse. Of course, that was back before Apex went to crap like most Chinese brands seem to, eventually.

      I had the same Apex model (the AD600A) - that thing was famous for being the first player that could be easily modified to be region free and macrovision free, but it was not built like a brick outhouse. It was a piece of junk. It used an early generation computer DVD-ROM drive and software-based mpeg decoding - just like all the cheap Chinese players do today. It was a pioneer in that, just as it was in other ways.

      It also had awful picture quality compared to almost any other player. Again, it used a pretty terrible software-based decoder that couldn't even compete 5 years ago, much less today. This was easy to overlook at the time, because of the things this player could do that no other player could, but today there are a huge variety of players that are both region free and macrovision free.

      The AD600A also never supported basic DVD features like seamless branching. So saying you've kept yours because it has fewer problems than other players is just kind of strange.

      There's no reason to hold on to this player anymore. It's not built nearly as well as you seem to think it is (even my Gateway player that I paid $50 for is built better, and my old Sony DVPS3000 is a tank compared to the AD600A... nevermind the DVPS7000), its picture quality was never any good, it tops out at s-video in terms of outputs, and other players do all the same things it does while conforming better to the DVD spec.

      It's time to replace your player, just as I did about 5 years ago now. Never regretted it either.

    8. Re:Works For Me by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Apex ad-1200 - region free, plays mp3, vcd, kvcd, svcd, pal, ntsc, jpg ... and it was region-free right out of the box (found the "hidden menu", but didn't need to do anything).

      I'll never buy a Sony anything. Paying more for fewer features and (in the case of their TVs) poorer picture quality is jut stupid.

    9. Re:Works For Me by segedunum · · Score: 3, Informative
      You might want to read this:

      http://handbrake.m0k.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=383 9&sid=8ef154d0c7e60ccd6ca7e1b64d38edbe

      By the way, the "Good" Main Feature in 'ZOOM' is only 2.97GB in size, so think about it for a New York Second: the DVD is 7.95GB in volume, or so the Finder's Get Info tells us, so we're paying for 5GB of CRAPOLA/GARBAGE from the nice engineers at Sony's DVD mastering house. Isn't that an amazing thought? 3GB of movie, and 5GB of CRAPOLA in 'ZOOM'! That's what you get from our favorite masters of the DVD, and we here at the MTR Project are happy to say this: It still isn't good enough to prevent backup by R-14!
    10. Re:Works For Me by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      The best DVD player I ever bought was a Philips. It came with a 3 year warranty, and broke down after 2 years, 6 months. They swapped it for a brand new model. The brand new model came with a 3 year warranty, and broke down after 2 years, 6 months. They swapped it for a second brand new model. The second brand new model came with a 3 year warranty, and we're not up to the 2 years, 6 months mark yet.

    11. Re:Works For Me by TekPolitik · · Score: 3, Funny

      They swapped it for a second brand new model. The second brand new model came with a 3 year warranty, and we're not up to the 2 years, 6 months mark yet.

      I forgot to mention the real sweet part. The cost of the new player is always lower than the old player, but the way Philips do the replacements is this: they tell the store to do the old player as a defective return and refund the purchase price, then sell you the new player (Presumably Philips reimburses the store for the full cost of doing so). Each time the DVD player breaks down within the warranty period, Philips actually pays me to get a new DVD player.

    12. Re:Works For Me by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      YHBT. HAND.

    13. Re:Works For Me by Vryl · · Score: 1

      you left out YHL.

    14. Re:Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU rtard

    15. Re:Works For Me by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      It came with a 3 year warranty, and broke down after 2 years, 6 months.
      Clearly you got the one that was supposed to come with a 2 year warranty. At least that's how it seems to work out for me.
      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    16. Re:Works For Me by vought · · Score: 1

      None of the aforementioned Sony discs work in our "classic" Pioneer DVL-919 Combo Laser/DVD/CD player.

      It should be noted that the DVL-919 was something of a pinnacle of combo players. And it doesn't play some DVD-Rs, either.

    17. Re:Works For Me by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      IINM, it IS the discs - with Sony's ARccOS protection.

      Is that what all this is about? 'mencoder -ss 60' takes care of that. Skips all the nasty Sony logos, too.

    18. Re:Works For Me by debest · · Score: 1

      Dude, this is Zoom you're talking about! Look at the review ratings. All 8GB on the disc is crapola!

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    19. Re:Works For Me by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Dude, this is Zoom you're talking about! Look at the review ratings. All 8GB on the disc is crapola!
      Well, yer ;-). However, it just shows what Sony is putting on there. I'm definitely ripping all my DVDs into something readable now. Nice one Sony!
    20. Re:Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UR teh sped.

    21. Re:Works For Me by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't give those IMDB ratings too much credence. They gave 'Eragon' and 'Leigonnaire' somewhere between 4 to 5. Neither deserve more than 1.

    22. Re:Works For Me by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      PSU OAU acronyms.
      IIMN... HHWT? Huh?

      BRB/TYT/LOL/etc. WU AAT when we HT"P" FBO BTH (or TM FS) and had 10 PCWs open, 5 IRC channels, etc.

      Did typing IINM SYA? ACO keystrokes? Is it TWU?

      No, IDMY L/S smarter, BTA a LOT of acronyms TAJPD.

      SFGO, IDM to SDAY, just TWAT is DMUAW.

    23. Re:Works For Me by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I had the first model Apex too. And, maybe the GP was lucky, but I can say that mine was a piece of garbage. It crapped out after just a few months.

      It's a shame too. Feature-wise it was amazing. I would have gladly paid a lot more for it if they had just built it right. I always hoped they would build a more expensive, better-built version but they never did. They just kept churning out crappy el-cheapo players.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Works For Me by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I still have my Phillips 400at from 1997 and my Toshiba 2109 from 1999. Both still work fine (gave the 400AT to the folks, who still use it). Of course, that was back when they still built them well, before the sub-$100 player came along with its cheapo components. The two Toshibas I bought after the 2109 both gave out within a year.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    25. Re:Works For Me by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Hey I know what would be funny! Let's respond to someone complaing about acronyms using, wait for it, this is the clever part, lots of acronyms!

      It'll be so funny!

    26. Re:Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMGWTFLOLYHBTHANDFOAD

    27. Re:Works For Me by FLEB · · Score: 1

      It was implied. Acronyms aren't the only way to save time and keystrokes, you know.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    28. Re:Works For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop bitching about your personal hangups on public forums. Who the hell gives a damn? Take it private!

    29. Re:Works For Me by debest · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't give those IMDB ratings too much credence. They gave 'Eragon' and 'Leigonnaire' somewhere between 4 to 5. Neither deserve more than 1.

      Then by that logic the "deserved" rating for Zoom is about -2 or -3!!
      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
  5. Dammit... by Chouonsoku · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can't make fun of Microsoft for having HD-DVDs that don't play on the Xbox 360.

    1. Re:Dammit... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is slashdot. You can ALWAYS insult microsoft for SOMETHING.

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  6. once... by cosmocain · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...upon a time i believed in a fairy tale. it was called "standardization and customer satisfaction".

    thanks, sony, for transporting me to the real world.

    1. Re:once... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some standards are holding up just fine. My 60 year telephone still works in any north american phone outlet. I can get music and news on my 60 year old radio, and I can listen to new records on my 60 year phonograph...once.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some standards are holding up just fine. My 60 year telephone still works in any north american phone outlet.

      Bullshit.
      60 years ago very few phones used plugs, rather they were hard wired into the wall. Those that did use plugs used a four pronged connector. The modren RJ-11 jack didn't even exist 60 years ago, it was introduced in the 70's.

    3. Re:once... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      No, Man! I ain't bullshittin' ya, I swear to god. I'm using it right now this very moment, Believe It Or Not. Pretty amazing, all this new technology also can bring a little one or two dollar plug adapter to connect to your RJ-11. The thing works great, rings loud as hell, tough as nails, and has a very comfortable hand set. It is completely original. The adapter hangs off the original cord. Everybody freaks when they pick it up and hear a tone because they think it's just decoration. And I have the little "ring" around my finger near the tip from the dial digging into it. Unfortunately, dial phones don't work all that well with these new fangled answering systems. Maybe if I whistle the right frequency...

      --
      What?
    4. Re:once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but your 60 year old radio will not be working once everyone is broadcasting digital.

    5. Re:once... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Some standards are holding up just fine. My 60 year telephone still works in any north american phone outlet.

      Bullshit.
      60 years ago very few phones used plugs, rather they were hard wired into the wall. Those that did use plugs used a four pronged connector. The modren RJ-11 jack didn't even exist 60 years ago, it was introduced in the 70's.
      RJ-11 is a connector standard. The underlying phone standard is unchanged. Your argument makes as much sense as claiming my old external fax modem doesn't use a serial cable because it needs an adapter to convert its DB-25 to the DE-9 serial port on my server. No, the basics of POTS have not changed since the 1870's.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:once... by general_re · · Score: 1

      Some standards are holding up just fine. My 60 year telephone still works in any north american phone outlet. Not at all. Bring it along to my house and plug it in if you like. Just don't expect to call anyone; the digital phone system here doesn't do pulse dialing. Nor does any VoIP provider that I know of, which pretty much renders your 60 year old unit useless in any North American outlet that gets a dial tone from any such service.

      Eventually it'll be left behind altogether. It's just a question of when, really.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    7. Re:once... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      And the roads and railroads go back over 2,000 years. It's the lack of long term standards that make digital media a terrible archiving method. We are making a horrible mess that will completely breakdown and be impossible to maintain. I don't see how there will be any legible 2,000 year old digital media. This is nuts. CD, then DVD, then Bluray(however you spell it) All of which barely work when new. And the "upgrades just keep on rollin'. Comparatively speaking, mechanical and photographic are still low maintenance by a long shot. We're still not good with electronics for the long term. The stuff is still way too fragile and delicate.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:once... by tropicdog · · Score: 1

      AC is just trolling or is uninformed. My connection to the Internet through DSL actually uses one of those 4 prong connections at the wall, is converted to RJ-11 and then makes it's way to my modem then to the rest of my network. That 4 prong connector is at least 34 years old (original equipment with the house) and still works. I'm in N. America. I haven't had a pulse style phone for a few years but the one I did have worked on this same phone service about 7 years ago. Of course that was before I ponied up for the DSL service too. Have no idea if one would work now.
      I guess when you live in the new urban sprawl that AC must live in, everything is shiny and new and nothing old exists, therefore nobody else "surely" could have a usable device that uses older connectors etc.

  7. Again? by tehwebguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't there a saying about someone burning you twice?

    If you buy from Sony and don't expect this to happen, who's fault is it really?

    --
    -- lol pwned
    1. Re:Again? by sokoban · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    2. Re:Again? by TekPolitik · · Score: 0

      fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

      I always thought it was "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

    3. Re:Again? by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      lololol. Hey, I've got a karma bonus and I'll spend it to approve of this post (the one currently modded -1 Flamebait that you probably can't see because you browse Slashdot at +tame).

    4. Re:Again? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you're in a drunken stupor it comes out much like the GP said.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Again? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you belong on this website?

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    6. Re:Again? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those who have missed the joke here, check out the Bush speech where he uses this saying

    7. Re:Again? by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      check out the Bush speech where he uses this saying

      Ah, I don't think that got played on the major media in Australia. Actually I used to think the send-ups of Bush on "Saturday Night Live" (we get it on cable) were hysterical. Then I visited the US a couple of years back and saw one of his press briefings live to air, and suddenly the send-ups didn't seem so funny anymore. Perhaps that is his strategy - avoid being sent up by making the reality so bad that you leave the satirists nowhere to go?

    8. Re:Again? by tm2b · · Score: 1

      (Nod to the W. reference) There is a Klingon saying:

      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, you're radioactive goo.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    9. Re:Again? by grolschie · · Score: 1

      I don't think that got played on the major media in Australia.
      You don't get Letterman across the ditch? I am sure it was on that. I remember seeing that clip alot elsewhere too.
    10. Re:Again? by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      You don't get Letterman across the ditch?

      As far as I know only on the Comedy Channel, which I rarely watch.

    11. Re:Again? by complexgeek · · Score: 1

      Letterman is on channel 10 most weeknights sometime between 11PM and 12AM. 10 recently outbid 9 for rights to CBS shows, which considering how 9 treated Letterman (random times, random days) is a big improvement.

    12. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That doesn't make sense! How can me be fooled once when you're twice me to be fooled you? And shame is once me, twice you when it should be henbasket.

      I think you're a communist!

    13. Re:Again? by CaseOfThaMondays · · Score: 1

      somewhere, someone in Tennessee was thinking to themselves "No sir Mr President, thats a Texas only quote."

      --
      thats pretty much my best post ever. I spent like 3 hours typing it.
    14. Re:Again? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Setting your userprefs as +6 Flamebait is the way to go. In between the stupid shite you occasionally get gems of angry hilarity (like the gp) or just posts which came down on the side of Microsoft/another adversary du jour a little too much.

      Makes threads a lot more interesting, I swear.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    15. Re:Again? by bitrot42 · · Score: 1


      >Isn't there a saying about someone burning you twice?

      Burning once is enough for a working copy.

      --
      FIXME: Add a sig here
  8. In the case of Casino Royale... by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it's obviously the universe conspiring to keep people from watching the dreck. Wish I'd got it on this new media.

    1. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I thought I was the only one who thought that movie was a disaster.

    2. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I thought all the use of current computer, cell phone and DVD devices were all the gadgets the movie needed. On the other hand, maybe it was all just a ploy for product ad placement in the movie.

      Otherwise, I thought the movie was great. The initial foot chase scene was definitely up to Bond standards, except that there were no vehicles involved (unless you count the earth mover). It sure established Daniel Craig as someone who has the physique to do the next three or four movies without looking like he needs a wheelchair.

      And the babes were first-rate. I mean, Catarina Murino was incredible, and Eva Green was no slouch. Even the bad girl, Ivana Milicevic, was tall and hot.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The movie was OK. However, I think it took itself far too seriously for a Bond movie. The Bond movies have always poked fun at themselves. After I was done watching Casino Royale, my friends and I looked at each other, and simultaneously, and unbidded, said, "Where was the mountain/giant spaceship/Oddjob?" (we're that good). Really, there was nothing *big* in the movie other than the giant plane, and that was boring.

    4. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you give each other hand jobs afterwards?

    5. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Bond with no gadgets and a lack of innuendo? What were they thinking?

      They were thinking, "Hey, let's actually make a movie according to Ian Fleming's original vision for once." Because you know that Casino Royale was originally a book, right?

      If you want to see gadgets and innuendo, you've got umpteen films to watch again and again. Some of us are quite content that finally Fleming's character has made it to the big screen as the author intended.

    6. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Bond movies have always poked fun at themselves.

      Not really. The first two (Dr. No and From Russia With Love) didn't, although they did have a couple of humorous moments (as did Fleming's books -- and look at Fleming's choice of character names, particularly the females). The later ones maybe a little. The Roger Moore Bond flicks, on the other hand, went overboard in making a farce of it all.

      I enjoyed this Casino Royale as a return to the Bond roots. (The other Casino Royale, with David Niven, Peter Sellers, Woody Allen, etc was also a farce, but it had some redeeming qualities (Joanna Pettet, Ursula Andress, Barbara Bouchet). Nice soundtrack, too.

      --
      -- Alastair
    7. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by Falladir · · Score: 1

      gadgets have lost their appeal. As for innuendo, it was there. Maybe it was just too subtle for you?

    8. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by coopex · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I was quite pleased when I saw that they had made a bond film where he was a cold blooded killer, not some suave "secret agent" cracking one liners. Gotta thank the rents for having some good taste in 60s paperbacks (alone with 1965 3book set of LOTR).

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    9. Re:In the case of Casino Royale... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      "Gadgets have lost their appeal"?
      What are you doing on /. then?!

  9. Haha by omega21 · · Score: 1

    Just one more nail in Sony's coffin.

    1. Re:Haha by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but like any good zombie, it keeps digging it's way back out of the ground.

    2. Re:Haha by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      Sony once had an advertising slogan: "Sony: No baloney!" I think current management supports the outer 2/3 of that expression. Another dinosaur megacorp grown beyond ability to manage itself properly, and at the wrong time to lose the ability as the global economy changes. We're going to see a lot of that soon enough. The change began back after the founder died and some hotshots took over. They lost their longterm vision. The customer once was the focus, now, " 3) profit!!!! "

      Also, obviously the film division's lawyers call the shots over the technology side now.

  10. Who owns the DVD format? by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1, Redundant

    When this happens with CD's, didn't Phillips (or whoever owns the CD format) threaten to revoke the license, so this 'not working' CD's couldn't be called CD's anymore? Could the same thing happen with this. The owner of the DVD format would just have to say, "If it doesn't play in "such and such" reference machine then it's illegal for you to call it a DVD?

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    1. Re:Who owns the DVD format? by repvik · · Score: 1

      Audio-CD's with copy-protection cannot have the Compact Disc label. To have that label, they must conform to RedBook (Not sure about the color... some kind of color-book)

    2. Re:Who owns the DVD format? by DownWithTheMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quote from some web-page or another...

      "No single company "owns" DVD. The official specification was developed by a consortium of ten companies: Hitachi, JVC, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Philips, Pioneer, Sony, Thomson, Time Warner, and Toshiba. Representatives from many other companies also contributed in various working groups. In May 1997, the DVD Consortium was replaced by the DVD Forum , which is open to all companies, and as of February 2000 had over 220 members. Time Warner originally trademarked the DVD logo, and has since assigned it to the DVD Format/Logo Licensing Corporation (DVD FLLC)."

      Looks like there isn't any kind of single company that can really rule on this and say, those aren't officially formatted DVDs... The fact that Sony was a main developer in the consortium would also probably make it that much harder to revoke any kind of "DVD" stamp from these disks...

    3. Re:Who owns the DVD format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was the Orange Book.

      Red Book is probably some OpenGL thingy.

    4. Re:Who owns the DVD format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DVD FLLC would actually be the one company to withdraw permission to use the DVD-Logo. In their FAQ they note that violation of the DVD Format/Logo License [...] may lead to termination of the License. The DVD FLLC license requires that the DVD-video logo is only printed on discs that comply with the proper "book" (spec). I do not know if licensing of the patents involved in building a DVD-player of producing DVD-Video discs also requires adherence to the standard - I whish it did.

    5. Re:Who owns the DVD format? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Audio-CD's with copy-protection cannot have the Compact Disc label. To have that label, they must conform to RedBook (Not sure about the color... some kind of color-book)

      The problem is everyone thought they knew what a CD looked like after a while, so they stopped paying Phillips for the logo. Without the logo, they did whatever they pleased and put them on the shelf next to the real CD's which finaly vanished.

      Try this for an excerise. Go to your local music retailer and pick out a couple dozen CD's. Put back any without any Philips Compact Disc logo. Take what is left of the $5 bill you took with you and have lunch.

      Red Book is the original Audio Compact Disc specification. Orange Book covers a multi-session CD that may contain other content such as a music video.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  11. DVD Spec? by Stormx2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a question. Is this allowed under the DVD spec? If so, I think the spec is very loosely defined. If not, maybe we could talk to the outlets about not stocking these discs under the "DVDs" section? IANAL, but wouldn't consumer protection laws prohibit that kinda thing?

  12. Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stranger than Fiction that the gf bought did not play in:

    Xbox

    Macbook

    Windows machine (apparently it will work if I upgrade Windows Media player or something)

    Needless to say, it was a benefit for me. I did not have to watch that crappy movie. Unfortunately, the gf made me download the movie, and she is going to want to watch it soon :(

    Anyways, I will not buy a Sony dvd again. Their proprietary formats are going to result in them losing a lot of customers.

    1. Re:Stranger than Fiction by someone1234 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Solution is obviously: Upgrade to linux and watch downloads.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    2. Re:Stranger than Fiction by kwandar · · Score: 1

      The solution is obvious ... class action suit for not notifying consumers that their copy protection crap may render their product useless. Humph - eat it again Sony!

    3. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Eternal+Vigilance · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the solution is obviously to upgrade girlfriends.

      (I realize that around here, unlike the rest of the world, that's more difficult than upgrading to Linux. ;-) )

    4. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the gf made me download the movie,

      I wonder, honestly, what the legal status of your download is. You paid for a copy of the movie, you now have a copy of the movie, but an unauthorized format was used when the authorized format failed.

      --
      We are all just people.
    5. Re:Stranger than Fiction by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've got a girlfriend?

      Stranger than fiction, indeed!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:Stranger than Fiction by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Informative

      You would be within your rights to be in possession of that downloaded copy (as long as you maintain ownership of the DVD as long as you keep the copy), but you would still be guilty of distribution of copyrighted material (a crime in the US; a civil liability in most of Europe) by participating in the download process.

      In other words, you're still not free and clear, but at the same time, it's unlikely that any court would find in the plaintiff's favor since you did buy the DVD (unless you did the "good" thing and let the download continue to seed for hours/days after completing, in which case you would clearly be distributing content illegally and even a sympathetic court would have no real alternative but to side with the prosecution).

    7. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Kjella · · Score: 1

      There's a long and better article about it here but in short, to the law it matters where the bits came from. If you have a CD and Bob somewhere on the Internet has a CD, and Bob has made an MP3 of his, and you download his MP3 it won't be legal. It doesn't matter that you own the CD, he had no right to distribute it, and so the illegal status of your copy still taints it. To use the terms of the article, the "color" of the bits would be different than the one you could make yourself, even if they're bit for bit identical.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He would be guilty of copyright infringement if only it was a torrent or some other protocol that requires the recipient to upload parts he recieved. He said generic download. It's not illegal to download anything short of child porn AFAIK.

    9. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, good movie. See it, but don't buy it on something that looks like a DVD.

    10. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the gf made me download the movie, and she is going to want to watch it soon :(
      Now that sounds like fiction to me. :-)
    11. Re:Stranger than Fiction by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of any download service which doesn't simultaneously upload which is currently in use to distribute movies. If you're aware of an exception, then you'd be absolutely correct.

    12. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good old-fashioned usenet!

    13. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try all of the old fashioned P2P networks, including gnutella, and the likes of eDonkey, granted they may not be the most popular method for movie downloads but certainly still valid.

    14. Re:Stranger than Fiction by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Usenet?

      Heck, these guys have a search engine that automatically unrars files, and lets you download almost any file over straight HTTP. I typically pull 1MByte/sec or higher.

    15. Re:Stranger than Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of people here breaking the first 2,345 rules of Usenet.

  13. Bravo by clem.dickey · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nothing new to see here people, keep moving...

    If I had mod points, then if I had a sense of humor, ... oh, nevermind.

    1. Re:Bravo by electrosoccertux · · Score: 0

      Just be sure to spread the message. Stay away!

    2. Re:Bravo by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      As I was reading the discussion, it suddenly dawned on me that Sony is probably just bitter because Beta didn't become popular, or as Sony likes to put it, "If we can't have the largest market share, then nobody can.", and/or "That'll teach you Aunt Tilley!!!".

  14. they've solved the piracy problem by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems that the most recent DVDs released by Sony -- specifically Stranger Than Fiction, Casino Royale, and The Pursuit of Happyness -- have some kind of 'feature' that makes them unplayable on many DVD players.

    Yeah, that's the copy protection feature. Hollywood finally figured out that if you can view it, you can copy it. If they simply make the content unplayable, nobody can pirate the movie!

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought that was the reason for all the unwatchable movies being made? If you make the movies bad enough no one will want to see them so no one will go to the trouble of copying the movie. It's like owning a beater car in a big city. If the car is crappy enough no one will go to the trouble of stealing it.

    2. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by cultrhetor · · Score: 1

      Even better - because the shrinkwrap has been opened, cu$tomer$ can't return it! Free money!

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    3. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      > If they simply make the content unplayable, nobody can pirate the movie!

      As opposed to their current practice of making movies unwatchable? What good movies have we seen so far this year? 300 is all I can think of and that's a maybe (it's like playing _Total War_ but not having to press any buttons).

      As for SONY: Corporate Death by Bluray.

    4. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by coopex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe I watched too much History Channel, but 300 was crap for me. Aside from various outright historical fuckups (300 spartans + 1400 other greeks, some random Persian payoff, all greeks being pretty much NAMBLA members, etc...), they decided to make Xexres an 8ft tall... queer sexual deviant, alone with having crab claw monsters at his command. The Departed was the next last film I saw, and I considered it a thousand times better.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    5. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by griffjon · · Score: 1

      If they simply make the content unplayable

      Hell, most of it's unwatchable already, this is simply the next logical step...

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    6. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by xwin · · Score: 1

      >>Yeah, that's the copy protection feature. Hollywood finally figured out that if you can view it, you
      >>can copy it. If they simply make the content unplayable, nobody can pirate the movie!

      The content was unwatchable before and now it is unplayable. Now there is no incentives to copy it at all.

    7. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the copy protection feature. Hollywood finally figured out that if you can view it, you can copy it. If they simply make the content unplayable, nobody can pirate the movie!

      I was under the impression they were trying a variation on this theme. If you make the content unwatchable, nobody will want to pirate the movie.

    8. Re:they've solved the piracy problem by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Do the Blu-Ray releases of these movies work OK? Is this DRM misery possibly being caused on purpose by Sony to try and squeeze people to their new format?

  15. Unreadable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sony embeds unreadable data which is just an unnoticeable blip on most players, but halts copying and some playback apparently.

    1. Re:Unreadable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which won't stop crap, because ripping will still be possible. Think about it like this. A scratch is just a "blip" that can make a CD or DVD unplayable in many players (and even MP3 ripping impossible). I have met some stubborn scratches, but have never had a problem getting around the scratch by simply creating an ISO. Try and Try as they may, they really did nothing to make copying THAT much more difficult, since you have to re-encode most DVDs anyway, unless you want to use DVD-9 discs.

    2. Re:Unreadable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is anything you could do to a CD or DVD that would stop someone from what is essentially taking a picture of the disk with a lazer and then burning another CD or DVD to look the same to a lazer. Sure, you could make it so that by default windows can't get a working file off a CD, but an ISO ripper will ignore anything saying "don't copy me!"

      Sure, you could make it not play in some players but that won't stop people from copying it, just piss off real customers. If you're a media company and you think you can stop someone from making an exact copy of your disk once it can play on a computer you're fooling yourself.

    3. Re:Unreadable by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      correct, they mess with the format of the actual data packets on the disk. The old school DVD hardware based players will intrepet the bad data as "scratches" but drives tuned more finely for data, multimedia, etc expect to do some error-correcting pre-processing so they won't drop the data... most copy protection exploits this behavior to "mess up" PC's trying to make good copies.

  16. Alternatives by karnal · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're having trouble playing them on the legit side, why not just rip them? Besides the moral issues, you could burn and watch then destroy the copy.....

    2 options: Ripit4me (in conjunction with dvddecrypter) or dvdfab decrypter....

    *ahem*verified on Stranger Than Fiction*ahem*

    --
    Karnal
    1. Re:Alternatives by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And once again, (also mentioned in a previous post) DRM has bitten the legitimate customer, but the "pirates" haven't even been slowed down, (or in this case, they didn't notice at all.)

      What it HAS done, is forced the legitimate customer to turn to the 'black market' to get access to the material that they payed for.

      "I bought this movie, and I can't play it, but it doesn't matter because I was able to grab a rip off the Internet that same day and burn a new one."

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    2. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I bought this movie, and I can't play it, but it doesn't matter because I was able to grab a rip off the Internet that same day and burn a new one."

      How about, "I just bought a new car, but I can't drive it. So I'll go to Rent-A-Wreck and rent one that will take me places"?

      You're just collaborating with Sony in making their ripoff product into an externality. Shit, they may as well just sell blank DVD's and let you go online to get the movie. Then, as a bonus, they get to put your niuts in a noos if they catch you.

    3. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed.
      I started DLing video games (my prior last bastion of copyright respect) when I got NWN and was angered at the number of bugs out of the box (most reportedly fixed by the 1.23 release. Let me repeat 1.TWENTY-THREE, implying there were 22 other releases post-shipping) and a forum post suggested that with the no-CD crack it played better. It didn't. But, in searching for a solution (that ironically didn't work) I found out about the world of game downloads and No-CD cracks. I had never noticed it until then.

      Then I downloaded the no-cd cracks for the other games I had purchased and played.
      Then, next time I wanted to buy a game, I downloaded it and the crack "to see if it was bug free before I bought it". Honestly, I realy intended that. But low and behold, I got around to the buying part less and less.

      Now, years later, I rarely play games anymore (life is too hectic) but when I do, they are downloaded and cracked.
      The Library for DVDs & CDs.
      BitTorrent for the 5 TV shows I watch (1 US reality show, 1 AU show, 1 UK show, 2 HBO shows).

    4. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that is the case. I've copying dvd's now for a number of years and I've never found one that I can't copy. An I'm not even a professional pirate. If this doesn't even inconvent me then its less than shit to the pros.

    5. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my that's rich. An AC calling an AC a coward.

    6. Re:Alternatives by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      If you're having trouble playing them on the legit side, why not just rip them?
      I've been doing that for a while.
      My set-top player seems to have trouble with the copy protection that Disney uses on most of their DVDs. So I end up ripping , and re-burning them.
      Those play just fine in the player.
      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    7. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're having trouble playing them on the legit side, why not just rip them? Besides the moral issues...

      The moral issues? I would think that this is one of the excuses you can have for ripping a dvd and have no qualms about the whole thing.

    8. Re:Alternatives by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      when I got NWN and was angered at the number of bugs out of the box (most reportedly fixed by the 1.23 release. Let me repeat 1.TWENTY-THREE, implying there were 22 other releases post-shipping)
      I think you're a bit fuzzy on release numbering systems; each decimal place represents a branch. Here's a list of patched versions of NWN, 1.23 was the 5th complete patched version. Still not good, but a far cry from the twenty-third release.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:Alternatives by rs232 · · Score: 1

      Mplayer has no problem playing Casino Royale and it comes as standard with every Linux distro out there. The only problem is has is with menu driven DVDs then you select the title with mplayer dvd:// 1 etc. Alternativly use Xine.

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    10. Re:Alternatives by ArtDent · · Score: 1

      Return it!

      Ripping it may make you feel like a total bad-ass who's really sticking it to the man, but think about it...how will Sony notice?

      They won't, not unless you return it.

      Returning it is the only way to demonstrate that this product is no good to you. Tell the store or service where you bought it that it is defective, and demand your money back. They may try to tell you that they don't offer refunds on opened media, and you can even humour them by accepting an exchange, taking it home, trying it out, and brining it back. Tell them that you've learned it's defective by design and it will never work in your DVD player. Don't take no for an answer. If they absolutely refuse to accept the return, pull out your cell phone, call the credit card company, and ask them to cancel the transaction.

      Sony will notice returns.

      Returns and bad publicity killed the record companies' attempts to add incompatible and malicious DRM to CDs after the fact, and there's no reason that it shouldn't work again.

      Oh, speaking of bad publicity, if you really do have a Sony DVD player that won't play one of these discs, call up the consumer advocate at your local news. They'll love the irony. Don't forget to mention the rootkit debacle of the recent past. They'll dig that, too.

  17. Blue-Ray and HD-DVD will force updates on users by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    if they want to view new disks.

  18. Happened to me by pionzypher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bought Casino Royale two weeks ago. When I got it home, neither my Toshiba in the living room, or the Pioneer in the bedroom would play it.

    So I ripped it and returned it.

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    1. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding right? I've never been able to return a defective DVD, except to get another copy of the same one. With "Tree's Lounge" there's a problem that causes it to stall then jump the better part of a minute. I returned it for another copy and got the exact same problem. I considered returning copies of it in perpetuity but decided the pain they'd feel was smaller than the inconvenience I'd feel.

    2. Re:Happened to me by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where did you buy it that they let you return it after it was opened?

    3. Re:Happened to me by D-Cypell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never been able to return a defective DVD, except to get another copy of the same one.

      I don't know how it works in the US and elsewhere in the world but in the UK we have consumer protection legislation which says if a product is not 'fit for purpose' then we have a legal right to a full refund.

      Occasionally a shop assistant will call over the manager and the manager will try to get 'cute'. In this situation you would be amazed how effective it is to kick up a little (and slightly noisy) fuss. Most managers are not too happy to see such things in their shops, it tends to put the browsing customers off. I dislike this behaviour when the customer is in the wrong, such as demanding a refund for a product that is an incorrect size or they just don't like (there is no legal provision for this, some shops offer a courtesy exchange, an offer to be accepted with gratitude), however, I don't like being screwed out of my rights and am happy to protest loudly when required and entitled.

      Should I be unfortunate enough to purchase one of these DVDs... pray you are not managing the shop when I come to return it :)

    4. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know how it works in the US and elsewhere in the world but in the UK we have consumer protection legislation which says if a product is not 'fit for purpose' then we have a legal right to a full refund.

      Yeah, we used to have that in the U.S. We also used to have fair use rights.

    5. Re:Happened to me by whirred · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go return it wherever you bought it, say it won't play, get one brand new and shrink-wrapped. Then return it the new shrink-wrapped one to the same store, or take it to WalMart/Costco and say it was a gift.

    6. Re:Happened to me by Soruk · · Score: 1

      Not sure where the GP poster is, but in the UK we have the Sale of Goods Act, and a disc like this is easy to demonstrate to be defective, and the Act therefore requires it to be replaced or the customer refunded. If the replacement also proves to be defective they pretty much have to refund the customer. The keywords here is "not of merchantable quality".

      --
      -- Soruk
    7. Re:Happened to me by cultrhetor · · Score: 1

      In the US, you get a little line on the receipt that tells you that once opened, you can only return it for an exchange of the same title.

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    8. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same legislation applies in Australia. It overrides all disclaimers which may be printed on a receipt, or anywhere else. If a shop refuses a *full refund* (not credit) for product which is "not fit for purpose" they are in breach of the law and your state Department of Fair Trading will be very interested to hear from you.

      A phone call to the department will generally put you in touch with a person who will verbally advise you of your rights and available courses of action. If you submit a formal written complaint to the department they will be prepared to ring the retailer on your behalf. It that doesn't work they will then prosecute.

      I know this from when a computer retailer refused to honour the three year warranty, which was printed on the box of a motherboard I bought. In this case the retailer caved in when I said I had taken advice from the Department of Fair Trading. Few if any retailers will hold out to the point where the DoFT calls them. Only an insane shopkeeper holds out to the prosecution stage. Most cave in as soon as you utter the phrase "not fit for purpose".

    9. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not the retailer's fault, and you've created a situation where most retail outlets will have to eat the cost of that disc--they can't resell it, and there's nothing wrong with it, so they won't be reimbursed for it.

      You might enjoy your flair for the dramatic, and it might make you feel high and powerful to make a scene in a store, but the product works as intended from the manufacturer and the retailer made the sale in an appropriate manner. All you're doing is taking advantage of decent customer service and contributing to increased animosity between retailers and customers.

      If you have a problem with a Sony disc, send it back to Sony with a copy of the receipt and demand a refund of the purchase price. Yeah, it's harder, and yeah it takes more time and effort, but that's what happens when you do the right thing.

      Never mind the whole "rip and return" issue, which is exactly the kind of thing that put DRM on products in the first place. The laziness of customers (who won't do anything to fix a broken system, but will happily ignore the law merely because it suits them and is the easier thing to do, all the while justifying it in their heads) is the real reason we've been foisted with all this crap. But this is Slashdot, so God forbid the evil companies aren't totally to blame.

    10. Re:Happened to me by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      and there's nothing wrong with it, so they won't be reimbursed for it.


      Ah, but there is. And I'm sure the Wal-marts of the world have enough clout to force the manufacture to take back his own dog food. And most of the other chain stores as well.

      After all, they can just decide not to carry certain movies at all, or at least Sony's.
    11. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      there's nothing wrong with it
      except there is, namely that it doesn't play on the poster's player.
    12. Re:Happened to me by joaobranco · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think complaining to the store, and making it suffer, is the correct option, since they obviously shouldn't have such a deffective item (not fit for purpose) for sale. Wouldn't you think Sony will be more responsive if they are harassed by their clients directly (the stores, which buy in bulk) than from a letter of someone who has no direct sales relationship with them?

    13. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's not a damn thing wrong with the disc. It is exactly as Sony intended it to be shipped, and having been involved in law suits about trying to get purchases reimbursed by the manufacturer (not everyone is a Walmart or a Target, and you'd be fairly surprised how little leverage most individual retailers--even chains--have over suppliers), it's not as simple as you make it seem.

      Retailers can't "not carry" Sony pictures, because people will notice the gaping holes in the collection and buy them elsewhere--the general public might be annoyed with Sony, but they're not going to stop buying their products. The retailer has to carry them, or they will suffer reduced sales elsewhere (because most people will shop where they have a full selection). The manufacturer won't eat their own products that work exactly as designed unless the PR gets really bad (like the CD rootkit) or they're forced to recall them by a regulatory body.

      Stores could get pissed off enough not to carry Sony products, but it's rare for a retailer not to have to accept getting reamed. The store's anger is not often greater than the consumer desire to purchase them. If they can't break even, they'll have to sit back and take it (even Target).

      In any case, you're still just advocating passing the buck. The retailers have zero to do with Sony's poor product choices--and as long as people continue to buy them in large numbers, they'll still be on shelves. The only way to get Sony to act is to avoid buying them in the first place, which means that retailers won't have to order new stock and Sony won't be making money from anyone.

    14. Re:Happened to me by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Let's assume it's really not the retailer fault... And so what? So he gives it back to the distributor, eventualy it'll go back to Sony.

      But the retailer is partialy at fault. He's doing business with dishonest partnes. On a sane society, losing money is the least one expect from doing business with dishonest people. That is, on a society where people stand to their acts, and don't go out of their way to protect the guilty...

    15. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      No, because when you buy the disc at the store, Sony makes its money. When you return it to the retailer, Sony keeps its money.

      Even if the retailers band together sufficiently to complain, the reparations cost Sony less than they cost the retailer--because the consumers have already given Sony their money, but the retailer has been bleeding cash.

      Sony would only be responsive if they weren't making money at all (i.e. the discs sit on the shelves, the retailers don't order new stock, and customers don't hand over any money for them). But as long as consumers buy the product initially (even if they return it the same day), the only person getting screwed is the retailer.

    16. Re:Happened to me by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      If I get one of these from a store like Wal-Mart and they won't give me my money back me and the manager are going to walk back to electronics and put the disk into every dvd player they have on display and show how the vast majority of them won't play it.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    17. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      The customer is at fault. He is doing business with a dishonest party. He is also too lazy to seek a remedy FROM the dishonest party (all the retailer did was offer the crap product for sale; you're the one who bought it--it can't be the retailer's fault any more than it is your own).

      In a sane society, people take responsibility for themselves and don't go out of their way to save a buck no matter who he screws in the process. Retailers are collateral damage. You're the one that chose to buy the defective product (you can argue that you didn't know about the ARCCOS crap, yes, but how is the retailer supposed to know? the veil of ignorance protects both parties). You are no less to blame than the retailer, and your actions result in harm only to the retailer, and do not translate into forcing the "bad guy" (Sony) to correct its actions. After all, Sony gets to keep its money, and maybe somewhere down the line, they have to give a free DVD to affected customers. The retailer has yet to reimbursed for the returns, and doesn't get free stock to compensate.

    18. Re:Happened to me by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's not a damn thing wrong with the disc.

      From who's point of view? Certainly not a consumer who gets it home and finds that it doesn't play. It is absolutely defective as far as he is concerned, and under basic requirements of servicability for the intended use under consumer protection laws it fails miserably.

      The seller of such merchandise had better be ready to deal with issues of this sort, it is part of being in business.

    19. Re:Happened to me by rthille · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Yep. That's why the solution is to get another copy of the same DVD, take it home, open it, try to play it, then take it back to the store an tell them that one won't play either. When you've gone thru almost their entire stock, take the last, unopened copy back to a different store and get your cash (or at least store-credit) back for the unopened one.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    20. Re:Happened to me by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      So you think it's better to screw the customer?

      Look, if the DVD doesn't work, take it back. It's up to the store and Sony to fight over who covers the return, the customer doesn't give a shit. But believe me, if enough customers return enough products, retailers WILL tell Sony to change or go screw themselves. And if enough customers return enough products, Sony WILL change the product.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    21. Re:Happened to me by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      The customer is at fault. He is doing business with a dishonest party. He is also too lazy to seek a remedy FROM the dishonest party
      But all the customer knows is that he bought that DVD at retailer X. IF I buy a new Ford from a Ford dealership, and it turns out to be a lemon - I don't go with the car to Ford in detroit demanding my money back. My state's lemon law allows me to bring it back to the dealer after certain conditions are met.

      I don't know what you percieve as Justice, but retailers are not helpless, and it is not up to the customer to spend more money on some stupid postage to get $20 bucks back, if he gets it back at all, from Sony, who he had no more direct business relationship with in the first place. Retailers get their premium from the fact that they act as MIDDLE MEN. That flow goes both ways.

      And yes, the disc is still defective. A DVD movie that doesn't play in a significant amount of DVD players may well be what the "manufacturer intended" but I'm sure he the manufacturer could intend to package a turd in a box, call it beef jerky, and it would be as he intended it, doesn't make the product a piece of shit.
    22. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the way selling works. The store has a contract with the customer to provide a working product. The relationship between Sony and the store is irrelevant to the customer. If Sony can't provide a working product then the store must find a supplier who can.

      If the store wants to advertise the product as "This silver disk is a drink coaster. It is not a DVD and does not play a movie when inserted into a DVD player" then the retailer has fulfilled his contract. As it is stores are misrepresenting their merchandise. It's the store's fault if they don't know what they are selling. If you asked for a hammer and the store sold you a screwdriver (claiming it was a hammer), the store can't use the excuse "but we were told it was a hammer". The contract said hammer, so they have to supply a hammer.

    23. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's some twisted logic.

    24. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if Walmart gets pissed off about this issue they can have a large direct impact on Sony's bottom line, I believe I have seen it estimated before that nearly half of the dvd sales (at least in the US) comes from Walmart alone.

    25. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      advocating passing the buck

      It's the shop's choice to stock a product that will not work in some perfectly alright DVD players. The customer has is in a business relation with the shop, not the manufacturer or the supplier of the disc. The shop is in a business relationship with the supplier. If the customer gets a product that is not "fit for purpose" (and there is no doubt that that is the case here), then he takes it up with the shop. If the shop also has a problem with the product, they need to deal with it on their end.

    26. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It varies in the states. Some states have "implied warranty" laws, which basically state what you said, that if a product is not suitable for it's intended purpose that it may be returned. Other states don't. It's best to look at the stores policy, which is usually clearly posted somewhere. If that policy says "all sales final" and you're in a state where they can legally make that statement, then shop somewhere else if you can.

    27. Re:Happened to me by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Please stop feeding the troll.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    28. Re:Happened to me by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      The customer is at fault. He is doing business with a dishonest party. He is also too lazy to seek a remedy FROM the dishonest party (all the retailer did was offer the crap product for sale; you're the one who bought it--it can't be the retailer's fault any more than it is your own). No. There are only two parties to the transaction: the customer and the retailer. The manufacturer is not involved in the sale at all. The retailer sold a product that does not work as it should. The retailer is ethically, morally, and in most countries legally required to correct the situation by either replacing the deficient product or refunding the purchase. The retailer may then seek redress from the manufacturer. It is certainly not the customer's responsibility to track down the manufacturer and ask them to correct the problem, and in fact often the manufacturer will refuse to deal with the customer and instead refer them back to the retailer.

      You're the one that chose to buy the defective product The retailer chose to sell the product and misrepresented what they were selling. It is the retailer's responsibility to ensure that the products they sell match the descriptions they provide.

      You are no less to blame than the retailer, and your actions result in harm only to the retailer, and do not translate into forcing the "bad guy" (Sony) to correct its actions. Where are you getting this stuff? The customer is completely blameless. They were told they were buying a DVD, with the clear implication that it would play in a DVD player. It does not. The retailer sold it to the customer. The retailer must correct their contract breach with the customer and then seek redress from their supplier. This is how it works in the real world.
    29. Re:Happened to me by Posting=!Working · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a few things that seem, I don't know, completely insane about your post:

      You think the customer is at fault for buying a DVD to play in their DVD player?

      The customer, who bought the DVD at a local retailer, is too "lazy" to seek remedy from Sony, in Japan, who they probably didn't even know was involved, rather than take it back to where they bought it?

      You think it's insane to take back a defective product to where you bought it from, since in your version of a sane society, this wouldn't happen?

      You think that the retailers are the ones who are getting screwed?

      I'm glad I don't live in your world.

      Dear China,
            Enclosed please find my 37" LCD television, I just bought it yesterday from Best Buy, and it just won't turn on at all. I would've sent this to Sanyo, but they said all their manufacturing is done in China now, so you are the responsible party. Please refund my $649.99, plus $39 tax, and if you wouldn't mind, the $147 shipping and $219.99 extended warranty purchase, as well. I need the refund as soon as possible, since I need it for a new TV.

                I still haven't had a reply from my previous 72 returns, please send those checks out at your earliest convenience.

      Thanks,

      Bob

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    30. Re:Happened to me by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1

      I did something similar to that once, not to the same extent, obviously.

      I bought the Commander & Conquer pack from Walmart, which included the original C&C + expansion, and RA + expansion. 2 out of the 5 CDs wouldn't work in my DVD-ROM, so I returned it for another copy, and this time, 2 different CDs refused to work. At this point, I gave up and returned the game completely. To this day, I still don't know whether the problem lies with the CDs or my DVD-ROM. I never experienced problems with other CDs though.

    31. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      From Sony's point of view. It is delivered exactly as it was made.

      The only reason that manufacturers reimburse retailers for returns is if they are defective or damaged. Sony isn't going to consider their own discs either of those, and so will not reimburse retailers for them. Sony MEANT to include this copy protection. Customers may not like it, but that doesn't make it defective. The whole "defective by design" campaign has apparently gotten people to forget that consumers have no legal power to label anything as defective.

      I know this is Slashdot, but reading comprehension has really gone down the tubes.

    32. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 0

      The customer screwed himself. It's not that complicated. You have a beef with Sony. Take it up with Sony. Your local retailer did not put copy protections on Sony's discs, and they don't have any control over it. Sony simply won't reimburse retailers (the products are not damaged or defective), and I'm not sure what kind of fantasy world you live in where retailers can afford to accept returns without manufacturer reimbursement.

      Further, if Sony won't pay for the returns, the stores can't afford *not* to carry Sony titles--they'll just bleed even more cash for not having a full selection of titles. Your "retailer boycott" only works if all the retailers dump Sony (instead, it'll just drive up sales for the retailers that continue stocking Sony). You're just passing the buck: "I don't want to bother with anything, so I'll just make the retailer deal with it, even though I'm the dumbass who bought the shitty disc in the first place."

      The customer is only screwing the retailer. Just like people like to complain about class-action lawsuits only benefiting the lawyers, this rip-and-dump buying strategy only hurts retailers. It does not hurt Sony one bit. If you made an initial purchase of a Sony product, Sony got paid. If you return the disc for "not working" and Sony receives its undamaged and functions-as-intended discs back from the retailer, Sony doesn't cut the retailer a check. Sony keeps the money, retailer loses the money. You'll kill the retailers, not the beast.

      How hard is that to understand, really?

    33. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      The product is not defective. Really. It's a bullshit product, yes, but it is not defective. That's like returning "antique finish" furniture for being damaged. Sony intended for this copy protection scheme to be on the disc. The consequence is that it is incompatible with some players.

      That has zero to do with the retailer, and they have no obligation to accept the return. They do it anyway, because it's good customer service and because customer backlash would be massive. But you, the customer, and Sony, the bad guy, have backed them into a corner. Sony won't pay for the disc (since it's not damaged or defective) and customers demand a refund (since it won't work in their player). The retailer gets the honour of eating the cost of the disc and both of the other parties go home with their money.

      Sony is at fault for not indicating that these discs are incompatible with some DVD players. The retailer had no way of knowing this, either. The customer thinks the disc is defective because it doesn't play (but the customer has no legal power to designate anything as defective).

    34. Re:Happened to me by ActionGaz · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it is in the US but here in Australia (and other countries) the discs would most certainly be unmerchantable, at least to some degree. It does not matter what Sony wants but what uses the average consumer would expect the disc to be fit for. In this case, it would be expected that the disc could be used to watch the movie on any DVD player. I don't know what level of failure would be allowed (i.e. how many models it could not be played on) but it could easily be shown that the discs are unplayable by deliberate design, making them defective and unmerchantable.

    35. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 0, Troll

      And yes, the disc is still defective. A DVD movie that doesn't play in a significant amount of DVD players may well be what the "manufacturer intended" but I'm sure he the manufacturer could intend to package a turd in a box, call it beef jerky, and it would be as he intended it, doesn't make the product a piece of shit.

      How is it defective? The problem with your view is that the customer is not the arbiter of defects. The manufacturer is (whose hand may be forced by a court or a regulatory body, but no one else). Sony obviously does not view these products as defective, and so no return policy mandates that they be accepted.

      If a company put shit in a bag and called it beef jerky, you wouldn't sue the store who sold it to you; they were completely uninvolved. They received a case of beef jerky from JERKY INC. and sold it. Customers got sick and complained, but who has liability? JERKY INC.

      The store would accept all returns and keep records for the lawsuit against JERKY INC. and would be reimbursed at some point by court order. But what if the "defect" isn't illegal? You have angry customers who want their money back, and a company who has committed no technical crime who won't give the money back to the retailer to give to the customer. So the refund comes out of the retailer's pocket (or the refusal to issue refunds damages their revenue). Either way, the retailer loses and both the customers and the bad guy keep their money. The bad guy just keeps doing it, and the customer keeps fucking buying products made by the bad guy.
    36. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 0, Troll

      The retailer sold a product that does not work as it should. The retailer is ethically, morally, and in most countries legally required to correct the situation by either replacing the deficient product or refunding the purchase.
      The customer does not get to decide if products work as they "should." The only parties who have any legal authority are regulatory bodies, the manufacturers themselves, and courts. Neither customers nor retailers have any authority in the matter to do anything other than make a complaint.

      As the product is delivered exactly as it was produced by the manufacturer, it is not defective. The retailer has no legal obligation to accept a return of one of these discs.

      The retailer chose to sell the product and misrepresented what they were selling. It is the retailer's responsibility to ensure that the products they sell match the descriptions they provide.
      How is the retailer supposed to know that Sony put bullshit copy protection on some of its DVDs? It is the manufacturer's responsibility to ensure that the products they provide meet the standards they advertise. The retailer has zero liability, unless their own description differs from that of the manufacturer. Sony is the only party misrepresenting anything; the retailer has no obligation to fact-check the claims on product packaging. None.

      The customer is completely blameless. They were told they were buying a DVD, with the clear implication that it would play in a DVD player. It does not. The retailer sold it to the customer. The retailer must correct their contract breach with the customer and then seek redress from their supplier.
      The retailer bought them with the understanding that they were DVD discs. Do you expect them to do a content analysis of the discs to ensure that they fully meet DVD standards? If you buy software from OfficeMax that says it will protect you from viruses, and if your computer gets infected, you don't have any right to redress from OfficeMax. The disc contained an intact copy of the 0s and 1s comprising the product. The retailer has not breached any contract with the customer--it sold a "Casino Royale" DVD to the customer. Sony provided that DVD with copy protection that makes it incompatible with some players. Retailers must only accept refunds for damaged, incomplete, or demonstrably defective products (not based on customer perception, but on physical evidence--if you exchange a DVD that doesn't play, and none of its replacements play, chances are it's your player). Retailers do not police advertising claims on product packaging. If you're not happy with potato chips, you send the bag label to Lays and they refund the purchase price. That's how the real world works.
    37. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference being that the discs aren't unmerchantable on a per-unit basis, but on the aggregate. Retailer return policies are for one-off problems, not for class issues. A court of law is the proper resolution of this issue, and not abuse of customer service policies. You can't return a bottle of Advil because it didn't get rid of your headache--but if you have reason to believe there's something wrong with the Advil, you can certainly take that up with the pharmaceutical company.

      The discs work as designed. They don't work as advertised (being that they are labeled DVDs), but retailers are not responsible for the claims made on the packaging of products they sell. Your ability to return a defective DVD is intended solely to allow for the replacement of manufacturing errors. Otherwise, you could buy and rip all of your DVDs and then return them because "they don't work on my Linux computer." No one has ever found that DVDs *must* play under Linux.

      This absolutely is an advertising issue along with an implied warranty of fitness issue. But the retail customer service remedy is not the correct one. It's the easiest way for customers to get their money back, but it merely treats the symptoms and harms an uninvolved third party.

    38. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Slashdot, trolls get +4 Insightful!

    39. Re:Happened to me by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      You are simply wrong about this. Do some research on consumer protection laws.

    40. Re:Happened to me by RichardU · · Score: 1

      Why not put a sticker on high return-rate items explaining the problems commonly reported? I would be pleased with any retailer that tried to protect the customers in such a manner, and upset with the manufacturer for making sub-par products.

    41. Re:Happened to me by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      You'll only kill retailers who spend all their money on Sony products no matter how much they lose on the proposition, which seems an unlikely course of action.

      Wal*Mart will tell Sony "We're only paying X% of the costs for future DVD purchases because people keep returning them at a rate dramatically higher than any other DVDs. Until you sort out that issue, we're going to deduct the cost of returned discs from future payments to you." Both sides in this equation have an ongoing business relationship and ongoing credits and debits they can push around, which individual customers do NOT.

      Retailer and Sony both lose money, customer doesn't. Eventually either Sony or retailer stops losing money by changing what they do, which was the entire goal. It's just using market forces, manipulating the profitability of the product, to force a change. No different than a boycott.

      How hard is that to understand, really?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    42. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      That only works with Wal-Mart. Most retailers (even large chain stores) do not have the leverage necessary to pull that sort of operation. Retailers pay up front for commodity purchases--they pay at the maintained wholesale rate issued by Sony. Anyone smaller than Target has the option of purchasing DVDs, and no favorable pricing negotiations.

      Sony is one of any number of large corporations with flat-rate pricing. They will not accept partial payment, and retailers simply cannot afford not to carry Sony titles as a matter of principle. There are no magic market forces at work about any sort of "business relationship" that gives any one company preferential treatment here. It's just another one of the many downsides to the *AA cartel. You can buy them or you can not buy them, but you can't send them a check for 90% of the asking price and not expect them to ship you 90% of the product.

      You continually fail to realize that it is the CUSTOMER who has a problem with SONY's products. The retailer is nothing more than a distributor. If you have a problem with your potato chips, you don't take them back to the supermarket. You write Lays and send them the bag label, and they claim they'll refund the purchase price. If you have a problem with your new Kitchenaid hand mixer, Kitchenaid handles the warranty repairs (outside the 30-day return period, which is a convenience to allow for instant gratification for broken products). If your TurboTax software eats your refund or miscalculates the total, it's not Best Buy's problem. If your physically-intact disc won't play because Sony put dumbshit DRM on it, it should not be the retailer's problem, either.

    43. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Having written a number of sales policies in my day, I beg to differ. I think you just don't understand them as well as you think you do. Provide citations for your interpretation if you think you're right. The burden of proof lies with the affirmative.

    44. Re:Happened to me by Zemran · · Score: 1

      This is clearly a case of "unfit for the purpose for which it was sold", in the UK, and not something that should take up court time. The main purpose of consumer rights is so that the average Joe does not have to resort to the time and cost of a court case which can take years just for a simple purchasing dispute. If I buy a DVD and I own an ordinary DVD player that is standard and in good working order then I can assume that the DVD should work in it and I am therefore entitled to a full refund if the DVD does not work in my player. If on the other hand I have a non-standard, non-compliant Linux box then I am not entitled to a refund unless I can show without doubt that said DVD does not work in a standard and compliant player. If the shop argues I should be able to take the case to the office of fair trading and they would deal with it for me. That way big business cannot screw little guys with this sort of deal.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    45. Re:Happened to me by asninn · · Score: 1

      How exactly are you supposed to find out it doesn't work without opening it?

      --
      butter the donkey
    46. Re:Happened to me by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      There's not a damn thing wrong with the disc.

      Yes there is. It's unsuitableof the purpose sold. It doesn't play on my DVD player.

      It is exactly as Sony intended it to be shipped,

      So? A company can't deliberately make a faulty product and say "it's meant to be that way". Ford didn't claim the tires on the Explorer were meant to be underinflated. Because if they did, they'd get their asses sued off.

      Retailers can't "not carry" Sony pictures, because people will notice the gaping holes in the collection and buy them elsewhere

      Wallmart can. So can any shop that relies primarily on impulse purchases. If a product is a net loss-maker then any shop other then DVD-only stores can't afford to sell them.

    47. Re:Happened to me by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      IIRC correctly (and IANAL but I studied it a number of years ago) the thing to mention is the "Sale of Goods Act". New goods which are sold should be of "merchantable quality" - they are meant to do the thing they are supposed to. The test case for this was someone advertising walking boots which let in lots of water - they were unfit for what they were supposed to do and the customer got a refund. If something that to all intents and purposes is a DVD does not play in a DVD player (and the DVD player is not at fault), then the DVD is not of "merchantable quality" and the customer is entitled to a full refund if they choose.

      Mentioning the above act and saying (of the DVD) "it's not of merchantable quality" in England and Wales usually gets results very quickly.

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    48. Re:Happened to me by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      If a DVD is sold as a DVD (and this can be implied - like for example, being sold with other DVD's or not having obvious labels saying that it isn't a DVD. Consider: "would a reasonable person expect this to play in their DVD player?") then it should work in a DVD player. It is misrepresentation and a breach of contract law (the contract between the customer [I pay you £X.XX's] and the retailer {I provide you with this DVD which is of merchantable quality"] if it doesn't. It also fails the Sale of Goods Act which says that goods must be of merchantable quality, ie, a DVD should play in a DVD player - I think that's perfectly reasonable. I do not buy DVD's expecting them only to sit on the shelf while I admire the cover art-work. I expect to watch them in a DVD player. Call me radical if you want but most people would probably expect that.

      If retail loses out, then they need to take it up with the manufacturer. A customers sale contract is with the retailer not the manufacturer (unless they bought direct), and it is the retailer who has to bear the brunt of the breached contract. Then the retailer has to sort matters out with the manufacturer because they have a contract with them.

      If retailers do not like having to obey the laws of the land, then tough.

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    49. Re:Happened to me by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      "No, because when you buy the disc at the store, Sony makes its money. When you return it to the retailer, Sony keeps its money."

      This isn't correct, at least not in the medium and long term.
      A scenario: Walmart or some other large distributor decides it's going to sell Casino Royale or similar. After a couple of days of sales, they notice their returns figures are much higher than normal. They're not going to tell the customer "Screw you: we don't care if your DVD doesn't play on the DVD player we sold you". They'll refund it. They'll do this until they are royally pissed off at Sony, whereupon they will ask them to explain the high rate of returns that is costing them significant expense. This will continue until they tell Sony that it's not profitable to do business with them anymore if they continue with this type of product.
      Most of the unit-shifting for Sony is done by a relatively small number of large companies, who the labels can't afford to irritate. Look at what happens when Walmart refuses to sell a CD for having a cover that they consider too explicit...

    50. Re:Happened to me by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      ... as demanding a refund for a product that is an incorrect size or they just don't like (there is no legal provision for this, some shops offer a courtesy exchange, an offer to be accepted with gratitude) ...

      Actually, if you buy over the phone or from the Internet you ARE intitled to return the item within 7 days and get a refund if you change your mind. Things like software, DVDs and CDs are excluded though.

      As the parent pointed above, if you buy from a shop you have no such right.

      More in general, here is some information on consumer rights in the UK:
      Consumer advice

    51. Re:Happened to me by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Retailers can't "not carry" Sony pictures, because people will notice the gaping holes in the collection and buy them elsewhere--the general public might be annoyed with Sony, but they're not going to stop buying their products. The retailer has to carry them, or they will suffer reduced sales elsewhere (because most people will shop where they have a full selection). The manufacturer won't eat their own products that work exactly as designed unless the PR gets really bad (like the CD rootkit) or they're forced to recall them by a regulatory body.


      Yeah, but said retailers can also separate Sony DVDs from the other ones and put big boards above the "Sony DVD box" saying "Beware: Some Sony DVDs contain DRM and might not work with your DVD Player"

      Buyers can then make their own decision on wether to take the risk or not.
      The retailer lets customers know up front of the problem, so they're much less likelly to have angry customers demanding a refund.
      The number of customers buying Sony DVDs decreases.

    52. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you're doing is taking advantage of decent customer service

      No, I'm just insisting on my legal rights: if stores supply me with defective products I return them; end of story. It's a shame that the reseller has to eat it and not Sony but there isn't a lot I can do about that.

    53. Re:Happened to me by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      You continually fail to realize I know exactly who has a problem with Sony's products, and the customers who try to make it the retailer's problems are using exactly the same economic pressure as is exerted in a boycott. The goal is to make Sony products unprofitable (or less profitable) for retailers to carry, no different from demanding dolphin-safe tuna. manufacturers do feel that pressure regardless of your idea that they will force retailers to buy massive quantities of their products no matter how much money they're losing (though i have no idea why that should be the customer's problems even if it were the case).

      And frankly, I don't know what lousy stores you go to, but if I have a problem with my potato chips or DVD or hand mixer, I don't bother calling Lays and spending my time and money to box and mail them shit. I take it back to the store and they give me a new one.

      The reason every consumer electronics device contains a big sheet saying "STOP! If you have a problem setting this up, don't return it to the store -- Call 1-800-MANUFACTURER!" is because it DOES cost manufacturers money for their products to be returned to stores. Whether that is directly due to credits to retailers for returned merchandise (which was my understanding, though it makes no difference) or due to lowered orders due to lowered profitability at the retail end due to high returns doesn't make any difference.

      All you're saying is that you find it distasteful or unethical or something to apply any economic pressure to retailers. Sorry, nobody else in our economy seems to agree that they should be free of such pressures. Most others see it is an effective means of getting what customers want from people higher up the economic chain.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    54. Re:Happened to me by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Firstly, many countries don't have a concept of "class action".

      Secondly, how am I as a customer (assuming I didn't know about this) supposed to know whether or not it's a one-off problem?

      1. Consumer law says "product must be fit for the purpose for which it was sold".
      2. DVD doesn't play in my DVD player, which is perfectly happy to play anything else. Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that the fault lies with the DVD being not fit for this purpose rather than the player.
      Therefore: 3. I have the right to return it.

      Whether 1 person, 100 people, 1000 people return the DVD - not my problem. I neither know nor care.

      Chains may not have much power with their suppliers over small things but if the supplier is directly responsible for them having to eat the cost of several thousand returns, I bet you anything you like they'll start to arm the lawyer cannons.

    55. Re:Happened to me by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Well, the customer is not directly interacting with a dishonest party (Sony), but he is really at fault when refusing to ask from his money back after being deluded. Ultimately, I do blame the customer on such things.

      Retailers are responsible for honest advertizing. If they where deluded by the manufacturer, they can pass the damage to them, if not, they are the only responsibles for what they do. Anyway, they are responsible for honest advertizing their products.

      And Sony IS damaged by that. If the retalier can't make money selling their products, he won't. If it is too risky, most won't sell and the others will ask for bigger profits (from Sony, since he doesn't have the power to change the market price). And, finaly (and not so important), the retailer will ask Sony for compensation.

      Yes, there'll be some damage to the retailer. But that is the cost of doing business with dishonest parties. That is the sole deterrent we have for dishonest people: doing business with them will hurt you. Remove it at your own peril.

    56. Re:Happened to me by Builder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in theory it works like that in the UK. But try and return one sometime.

      I've tried to return a CD and a DVD on different occasions that would not play in either of my players. Most stores (including Tesco and HMV) now have signs up telling you that they will only swap the DVD / CD for another of the same title and will not refund you. And the managers stick to this.

      Invoking the sale of goods act made no difference and the DTI in Newham were completely uninterested.

      So I just stopped buying CDs and DVDs.

    57. Re:Happened to me by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      My 'contract of sale' is between myself and the retailer. 'Fit for purpose' means it runs on any device that I could reasonably expect to run it on. If my 'contract of sale' is broken because the item I purchased is not 'fit for purpose' then it is the retailers responsibility to resolve the issue according the laws in place. If they refuse to do this... then yes, I will lose my temper.

      I am not responsible for the retailers relationship with their supplier. That is their concern not mine. It is their job to negotiate reimbursement for any items returned faulty. I am not familier with legislation in this area (or if there is any) nor should I be expected to be. Either they arrange something with their suppliers or accept it as 'the cost of doing business', frankly it is not my problem. I will adjust my attitude slightly based on the context, but if I am at a shop that will happily 'hard sell' over priced extended warranties to little old ladies that dont know any better then they can expect no mercy from me.

    58. Re:Happened to me by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Retailer return policies are for one-off problems, not for class issues. A court of law is the proper resolution of this issue, and not abuse of customer service policies.

      Abuse ? Returning a defective DVD is exercising your legal right to demand that the store fullfills its end of the contract of sale which assigned the ownership of the DVD to you in exchange of money in the first place. The store failed their end - they gave you a product which doesn't work as promised - but you are graciously giving them a chance to fix their error before suing them, since you believe they made it in good faith rather than as a deliberate attempt to defraud you. How is that abuse ?

      You can't return a bottle of Advil because it didn't get rid of your headache--but if you have reason to believe there's something wrong with the Advil, you can certainly take that up with the pharmaceutical company.

      It is impossible to prove that something didn't get rid of your headache. It is trivial to demonstrate that these "DVDs" don't work as promised by simply putting them into a DVD player and atttempting to play them. Your example is defective :).

      The discs work as designed. They don't work as advertised (being that they are labeled DVDs), but retailers are not responsible for the claims made on the packaging of products they sell.

      Of course they are. They may avoid charges of fraud if they acted on good faith, thinking that the advertizing was correct and not being able to check the truth of this without opening the package for example, but they most certainly are required to either replace the defective product with a new one or give the customers money back.

      Where on Earth did you get the idea that you can be not responsible for a sale you made ? Or that intentionally selling defective products would make you less responsible than doing it by accident ?

      Your ability to return a defective DVD is intended solely to allow for the replacement of manufacturing errors.

      Your ability to return a defective DVD is firmly rooted in consumer protection laws as well as contractual laws. It is not a gracious courtesy from the stores part, but a legal obligation underlaying the whole economy: you must deliver what you promised, or dissolve the contract, refunding any already made payments.

      It's exactly the same thing that causes you to lose your house or car if you fail to make the payments in time; only this time it's working for you.

      Otherwise, you could buy and rip all of your DVDs and then return them because "they don't work on my Linux computer." No one has ever found that DVDs *must* play under Linux.

      Apart from the fact that I've never encountered a DVD which wouldn't play on Linux (using Xine), I think the court - even US court - might find the argument that DVDs sold as video DVDs don't have to play on DVD players strange when the whole purpose of a video DVD is to be played on DVD player.

      This absolutely is an advertising issue along with an implied warranty of fitness issue. But the retail customer service remedy is not the correct one. It's the easiest way for customers to get their money back, but it merely treats the symptoms and harms an uninvolved third party.

      Retail store is neither uninvolved nor a third party. It sold you the defective DVD; it is responsible of fullfilling its end of that contract by delivering you a non-defective DVD or, if that should turn out to be impossible (as is likely since all the DVDs of this batch seem to be defective), dissolving the contract and giving you your money back. The store can then take the issue up with whoever sold the DVD to them, and get their money back.

      But

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    59. Re:Happened to me by D-Cypell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here you go.

      Maybe the law is different in your part of the world. Notice this...

      They must also be fit for any specific or particular purpose made known to the seller at the time of the agreement.

      So, if someone tells me in advance that this DVD will not play in certain machines then I am not within my rights to demand a refund. Does this generally happen where you are? I have started to see stickers on certain CDs that tell me that the CD will not play in some CD-ROM style drives. Fine! I know and can make my choice. Otherwise, I am in the right. The product is not fit for the purpose described (it is not difficult to argue that a DVD is not fit for purpose if it does not play in all DVD players, both display the DVD logo). You should consider this when you write your 'sales policies'.

    60. Re:Happened to me by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      Yes, good point.

      I had forgotten about the mail order differences. I shouldn't have. I worked for a company that offered payment services to internet merchants for 2 years and often had to advise on this. I don't know why I didn't remember, but thanks for the reminder.

    61. Re:Happened to me by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. The stores don't let you return opened media /unless defective/, in which case you get a copy of the same media.

      Someone else suggested doing that, then returning the now-sealed version. If they mark your receipt, or otherwise keep track of your returns, this may not work.

    62. Re:Happened to me by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The product is not defective. Really. It's a bullshit product, yes, but it is not defective. That's like returning "antique finish" furniture for being damaged. Sony intended for this copy protection scheme to be on the disc. The consequence is that it is incompatible with some players.

      Did Sony intend for the disk to not be playable in DVD players? That is an unintended consequence. It would be returning the "antique finish" furniture because the crappy varnish causes rashes in everyone that sits on it. Yes, they intended to put the varnish on, but did they really intend for a chair to not function properly as a chair?

      That has zero to do with the retailer, and they have no obligation to accept the return.

      They put it in the DVD section with other movies. They imply it is a DVD via product placement. They sold it to me as such. If I am lead to reasonably believe that it is e DVD playable in my DVD player, and purchase it as such, if it does not work in that capacity it is essentially a fraudulent sale. Since you are trying to be strict about who is responsible for what, you should pick up the phone and dial 911 and report Wal-Mart for fraudulently representing Sony DVD-like disks as DVDs. Instead of such literal and stupid treatment as you suggest, stores are happy to take returns of merchandise that is defective.

      And yes, a disk that is marketed as a DVD that does not play as a DVD is defective. Even if it is defective by design.

    63. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. The stores don't let you return opened media /unless defective/, in which case you get a copy of the same media.

      Someone else suggested doing that, then returning the now-sealed version. If they mark your receipt, or otherwise keep track of your returns, this may not work.

      Many stores nowadays will just open the DVD you exchange it for so that you can't try taking it back somewhere else to get money back on it. The reason they do this is because far too many crooks have taken advantage of that loophole and they had to close it. Overall it affects more crooks than legit customers, but it really sucks in cases like this where you're a legit customer and the policy impacts you.

      That said, the ultimate decision on returns is up to management if you complain about the policy and ask to speak to a manager. If you bring a copy of an article along telling about the DRM issues making the DVD unplayable and are polite most managers will probably give you a refund. Stores are getting screwed on this too, all the media companies (music and video) have gotten horribly anal about accepting returns from stores and won't reimburse them for the bad discs. Since this case is caused by Sony you can bet that they won't be eager to reimburse the stores for any returned discs. Ultimately everyone loses, except Sony probably who's making money selling intentionally defective products and forcing the losses off on customers and retailers.

    64. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      The DVD logo doesn't mean anything. Warranty of fitness does NOT, I repeat, DOES NOT mean that customer assumptions must be met. It means that a factual representation on the product or an obvious physical trait must function as intended.

      It does not mean that baseless logos (the DVD logo has no certification behind it--it is NOT like the CD Audio logo) must mean what customers assume them to mean. Again, as I have said, you do have a misrepresentation claim against SONY, but warranty of fitness is a claim for merchants and is totally separate from inaccurate customer assumptions.

    65. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      No, I'm saying it's inefficient to pressure retailers to correct something disliked about a product vis-a-vis buying the product anyway, and then returning it to the retailer.

      It's not the same as something that is plainly and physically broken, which is easily reimbursed. When you have problems with software, you go to the manufacturer. That's the way the digital marketplace was set up (with good reason; retailers and distributors have jack-shit to do with the performance, compatibility, or operation of software and have no capacity to do any sort of testing to defend that guarantee).

      If the product is purchased, the manufacturer is paid. If it is returned, the manufacturer does not reimburse for software products, except for mis-pressed or damaged discs. That's why almost no one takes flat-out returns of opened software (this policy predates the piracy scare)--because the retailers have no hope of recouping the loss, and no option not to carry audio CDs, DVDs, and/or software when they have invested in providing those services. Yes, if all the manufacturers band together, they can get Sony to label these DVDs or they can even choose to label them at the stores--but that process takes several weeks and a lot of talks with legal (because the store can't label the discs until it has been demonstrated that it's not a player problem [even though we know it's not]).

      Write to Sony, sue Sony, send the disc back to Sony. But advocating *buying* discs in large numbers and then dumping them back on retailers as the OP did only generates more money for Sony, however well-intentioned the idea is.

    66. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Walmart is the 10,000 pound gorilla. No other retailer has the clout that Walmart does, and even large chains like Target and Best Buy would need a massive media campaign to have any sort of effective leverage.

      Of course the retailer is going to accept the return--it's good customer service to do so, and however much people like to bitch, stores are remarkably flexible about accepting returns. My point is that the retailer is doing this in good faith and shouldn't be the one victimized by a pump and dump scheme as advocated by the OP.

      If you bought one of these discs and found it didn't play, certainly returning it would be one appropriate choice to make (but not ripping it, since you want your money back for not being able to make use of the disc). However, advocating a scheme to go out and buy these products, rip them "on principle" and then dump the pile back at retailers' feet is targeting the wrong party. Retailers are almost never reimbursed for open stock software of any kind--which is why most of them won't accept it generally (they only get money for damaged discs and mis-pressed ones). That's a reality of retail. They'll never make that money back, and customers demand to have the product available (and high initial sales will drive increased orders for the product, because the returned discs can't be put back on the shelves, and empty shelves need to be filled, creating a massive revenue stream for Sony).

    67. Re:Happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a problem with your potato chips, you don't take them back to the supermarket. You write Lays and send them the bag label, and they claim they'll refund the purchase price. If you have a problem with your new Kitchenaid hand mixer, Kitchenaid handles the warranty repairs (outside the 30-day return period, which is a convenience to allow for instant gratification for broken products).

      I don't know about the US but in the UK, consumer law clearly states in BOTH cases that your implied contract is directly with the retailer and it is entirely up to them to replace the product (in the first case) or replace the product or arrange the repair - with no 30 day limit or similar (in the second case). The whole point of this is that you gave your money to the retailer, so your contract is with them. They must deal with the supplier at their expense if necessary. The nature of the fault - defect, design, transit damage is entirely irrelevant, as is the intent of the manufacturer. In the DVD case, the retailer is responsible for the goods being fit for the purpose that they, the retailer, sold it for (not the purpose they were designed for). Selling a DVD clearly implies unless otherwise stated that it will play on any standard DVD player.

      My understanding also is that in the UK you have no legal standing with the manufacturer (since you have no contract with them) and therefore you are legally expected to deal with the retailer.

    68. Re:Happened to me by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

      Write to Sony, sue Sony, send the disc back to Sony. But advocating *buying* discs in large numbers and then dumping them back on retailers as the OP did only generates more money for Sony, however well-intentioned the idea is.

      If Sony won't accept returns from the stores, whom they have a business relationship with, how likely is it that they will accept returns from individual customers? You know damn well that Sony will not accept these returns.

      Your "advice" is equivalent to "hope really hard! and write a letter to your local newspaper."

      That's the way the digital marketplace was set up (with good reason; retailers and distributors have jack-shit to do with the performance, compatibility, or operation of software and have no capacity to do any sort of testing to defend that guarantee).

      I'm sorry, but by opening a retail store, you take on responsibility for the customer's sales experience. That includes helping people with stupid questions and accepting returns for products that didn't work (and even some products that did!) If you don't like it, you can get into some other business.

      If you are selling products that are advertised as "compatible with X" and they aren't compatible with X, then I have no sympathy for you. Your high-horse attidue of "it's the customer's problem" comes close to being a blatant troll. Buying and returning these defective discs *will* put the hurt on Sony-- and any retail outlets stupid enough to carry them in the first place.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    69. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      It's not trolling in the least. I didn't say it was the customer's problem entirely--I said it is no more the retailer's problem than the customer's, and it's not fair to force the retailer to accept the loss because you, the customer, aren't willing to do any of the legwork. Someone needs to deal with Sony, and that means a CUSTOMER needs to step up to the plate and sue. Retailers don't have any stake in the issue and don't make a convincing plaintiff. The retailers aren't the ones advertising DVD compatibility, not that there even is such a thing (the DVD logo is meaningless). The customers are the ones demanding Sony products, even though they have serious problems. The customers are the ones encountering difficulty with Sony products not working as they expect. Sony is the one making the misleading claim.

      I swear to Aisha it's not that hard to understand that Sony is the legally liable party. Remember the rootkits? Same deal. Contaminated dog food? Not Petsmart's legal problem. Faulty TurboTax software? Not OfficeMax's responsibility. Failure of hydraulic jack to hold the advertised 2000 pounds, breaking your car? You won't win any money in a suit against Autozone, unless it's a store brand jack.

      If you bought one of these DVDs unwittingly and it doesn't work, return it. But don't buy all the DVDs you can find, rip them all, and return them all just because you're having a little tantrum. All that does is make money for Sony and leave retailers with a gaping hole in the cash registers. It's the pump and dump scheme (at the top of this thread) that is reprehensible. It's exploitation of customer service and retailers at their expense, and it doesn't do anything to Sony's bottom line except make it bigger.

    70. Re:Happened to me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      It is trivial to demonstrate that these "DVDs" don't work as promised by simply putting them into a DVD player and atttempting to play them . Problem being that most DVD players will play these discs just fine according to TFA. Ergo, the obvious conclusion is that the player is defective. This would not be accurate however, as Sony deliberately changed the copy protection and left some player products out of the loop.

      The store failed their end - they gave you a product which doesn't work as promised Where is the promise that the disc will work on all players, and where is the authoritative proof that your player isn't the problem, and not the disc? I have an old DVD player that doesn't handle dual-layer discs very well (and often not at all), but if I didn't know that, I'd wrongly assume the DVD was broken. Since the DVD logo itself is meaningless, and since it is a software product with extreme difficulty to determine problems given that they are not primarily physical, it's quite hard to demonstrate that a properly pressed disc is not "fit for purpose" since there is no guiding standard outlining the purpose. Customer assumption is not a legal defence prima facie.

      Your ability to return a defective DVD is firmly rooted in consumer protection laws as well as contractual laws. It is not a gracious courtesy from the stores part, but a legal obligation underlaying the whole economy
      That is not the issue. The issue is that the determination of its status as "defective" has not been made, and since it is a legal status, customer perception is not authoritative. If a given software application does not work on your system, even though it meets the minimum requirements on the box, your right to redress is with the software manufacturer. The retailer does not guarantee the function of software and no court has held that it is responsible to do so. The retailer's warranty of merchantability extends only to specify that the product meets the manufacturer specifications. The warranty of fitness extends only as far to deliver a functional disc containing all of the data required of it. Neither software bugs nor DRM problems are retailer/merchant liabilities.

      This is a fundamental distinction which Slashdotters seem wholly unable to grasp.

      They haven't sold you anything, so they aren't under any obligation to take any action on your behalf; they have no contract with you. The dispute is not contractual in nature; this comment of yours is non sequitur. The claim of misrepresentation and failure to disclose limitations are the purview of advertising and marketing and not of contracts. The disc fully conforms to the DVD format (the disc type and laser response); there is no DVD specification requirement that these discs do not meet. They do have DVD video (VOB/MPEG2+AC3/PCM) content, and there is no prohibition against copy protection or even machine-specific DRM in the standard. There is no DVD "red book" and no way to argue that the disc is not fit for purpose as a DVD disc (since DVD standards only specify laser response and data structure). The only relevant claims are misrepresentation of product and failure to disclose limitations not apparent.
    71. Re:Happened to me by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

      I swear to Aisha it's not that hard to understand that Sony is the legally liable party. Remember the rootkits? Same deal. Contaminated dog food? Not Petsmart's legal problem. Faulty TurboTax software? Not OfficeMax's responsibility. Failure of hydraulic jack to hold the advertised 2000 pounds, breaking your car? You won't win any money in a suit against Autozone, unless it's a store brand jack.

      But what if the store knows that the items are defective, but continues to sell them? What if the store keeps selling the poisonous pet food after it has been recalled? Then we are quite right to blame the retailer.

      Which is exactly the situation here.

      If you bought one of these DVDs unwittingly and it doesn't work, return it. But don't buy all the DVDs you can find, rip them all, and return them all just because you're having a little tantrum. All that does is make money for Sony and leave retailers with a gaping hole in the cash registers. It's the pump and dump scheme (at the top of this thread) that is reprehensible. It's exploitation of customer service and retailers at their expense, and it doesn't do anything to Sony's bottom line except make it bigger.

      We've been through this over and over. The point is to convince people selling defective merchandise, not to do that.

      Retailers are fully aware of the problems with copy protection. They know that it will increase return costs by some percent. If that percentage is high enough, they will go with another vendor to fill the "entertainment" niche.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  19. The sad thing is - by ditoa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that this new copy protection system will not stop the DVD from being ripped and will only effect people who legally bought the DVD.

    It is things like this that make me cautious about buying media from Sony these days. I have no problem with buying DVDs however one of the reasons I buy a DVD is that I know it will work perfectly in any DVD I wish to buy (unlike XviD rips from BitTorrent or Usenet) however apparently this isn't true anymore so DVD is now no better than a rip downloaded from the internet.

    It is a shame that the companies are worsening their products with these copy protection systems to help fight piracy when all they end up doing is ruining it for the people who want to buy DVDs.

    One thing that I have wondered about for a while is how many DVD rips online originate from retail DVDs? I would have thought the majority (if not all) came from pre-release copies as the DVD rips are normally several weeks (if not months) ahead of a retail DVD release.

    1. Re:The sad thing is - by ditoa · · Score: 1

      Oops typo!

      That should be - "work perfectly in any DVD player I wish to buy"

    2. Re:The sad thing is - by weld · · Score: 1

      What are they thinking over at Sony? A copy protection scheme that doesn't stop the latest popular ripping programs like DVDfab but causes the disk not to play in their own latest DVD players. Some one should be fired. What is the point of a copy protection scheme that lets popular rippers copy it? Am I missing something?

    3. Re:The sad thing is - by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with buying DVDs however one of the reasons I buy a DVD is that I know it will work perfectly in any DVD I wish to buy (unlike XviD rips from BitTorrent or Usenet) however apparently this isn't true anymore so DVD is now no better than a rip downloaded from the internet.


      I venture you're on the wrong trackers, the ones I usually frequent have Quality Standards that make some Studios look like backroom operations.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    4. Re:The sad thing is - by ditoa · · Score: 1

      I used it more of an example that there is not a standards body for XviD ergo you cannot guarantee that a rip will play in your player however with DVD you do have that guarantee, or at least you had it.

      I am yet to see a rip that is better than a retail release however you are correct in saying that the majority all play fine. However every now and then I still get a poor rip (dodgy audio, poor cropping, etc).

  20. Other problem titles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Audioholics forum had a thread late last month about DVDs that wouldn't play properly. There are other problem titles mentioned as well: http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showthread.ph p?t=30819

  21. Casino Royale by DieByWire · · Score: 1

    I suspected something like that was going on. I just tried to make a disk image of Casino Royale on my Powerbook so that I could watch it on the road without bringing the disc along. I kept getting error messages, so I gave up and brought the disc with me.

    One more reason I won't buy Sony hardware.

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
    1. Re:Casino Royale by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Since you're a mac user, have you tried using mactheripper?

      www.ripdifferent.com

      If it works, let me know, I'm planning on buying casion royale to rip with MTR.

    2. Re:Casino Royale by nernie · · Score: 1

      i like handbrake handbrake.m0k.org better than MTR

    3. Re:Casino Royale by DieByWire · · Score: 1

      Since you're a mac user, have you tried using mactheripper?

      I actually tried that first, but kept getting an I/O error warning. Then I thought, 'Why bother?' I've got plenty of HD space, so I went for a straight disk image.

      The disc played fine under Apple's DVD player, but I did wonder at the time if it would be broken on a lot of hardware.

      For me, it's just an inconvenience - I'd rather leave the discs at home when I travel. It does say a lot about how they feel about their customers.

      --
      Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
    4. Re:Casino Royale by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      MacTheRipper 2.66 did not work for me on "Stranger Than Fiction", but 3.0r14 did in "Main Feature Extraction" mode. I did not try HandBrake.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:Casino Royale by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Right, i've got it now.

      When using MTR, you can select Arccos extraction mode, and that does the trick!

    6. Re:Casino Royale by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      good luck. MTR wouldn't do Casino Royale or Stranger than Fiction on my machine.

  22. Can't you sue to get disc no longer DVD certified? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    I don't believe Sony is the holder of the DVD certification. If this new protection is not part of the official DVD certifications, then their DVD's should not be using the certification and should have a disclaimer on them, much like the "CD"'s which didn't work in CD players.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  23. Oh, the irony! by Arkaic · · Score: 1

    I can't help but chuckle. Good suggestion though.

  24. Support Piracy by Quzak · · Score: 1

    Just another in a long list of reasons to stop buying media and support piracy, or just not view the media at all. Vote with your money folks, its that easy.

    --
    Support your local school shooter, give them your firearms.
    1. Re:Support Piracy by Kandenshi · · Score: 1

      Voting with your wallet is a good idea IMO, but only if they realize WHY you're voting with your wallet. Write a letter too explaining that you don't want crippled formats, and that's why you're no longer buying their products.

      Just stopping your purchasing might not be enough for them to realize WHY people aren't buying their crap anymore.

    2. Re:Support Piracy by lilomar · · Score: 1

      Just stopping your purchasing might not be enough for them to realize WHY people aren't buying their crap anymore. It's obviously because of all the cheap bastards using bittorrent to pirate all of their stuff. It couldn't be anything they did, they are the film industry.

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
  25. Maybe not only sony by fermion · · Score: 1
    I buy a number of DVDs and have noticed over the past year there are certain troubles playing them on a computer. The DVDs are new, and I have tried them on different computer. The problem appears to involve decoding certain area. I see no scratches.

    I was wondering if this was a method to depreciate the value of the DVD and force people to upgrade to the new formats. I myself look at this as another indication that they are not seriously interested in selling content and wish for consumers to find over avenues of acquiring the movies. I mean even why we try follow the rules we still get ripped off.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  26. I've got Casino Royale... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    And it doesn't play on MSWindows & WinDVD. I don't want to pay to update my copy of winDVD, so I kind of shrugged it off for now.

    I figure someone's got a way I can copy it and get rid of the new copy protection so that I can view it on my computer?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:I've got Casino Royale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were you, I'd just say fuck it and grab it off a torrent site. You paid for the DVD; if there's any justice in this world, a judge isn't going to make you pay up for downloading what you've already bought.

      Of course, there's the small issue that you can't download a torrent without uploading it as well...

    2. Re:I've got Casino Royale... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      VLC should work fine. You can use VLC to transcode it to a more modern format like Xvid or H.264 to save space as well.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:I've got Casino Royale... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Just use VLC? (The Windows binary includes decss.)

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    4. Re:I've got Casino Royale... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Just to be completely pedantic, VLC includes libdvdcss, a much better replacement for DeCSS developed by VideoLAN themselves.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  27. Prevents casual "rent and burn" by ConfusedSelfHating · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This copy protection prevents most people from renting/borrowing a DVD and making a copy of it. Until people download the latest software for cracking it. This is mostly targetting non-technical people who were given DVD Shrink by a friend.

    There will be copies of the DVD available on the Internet, because someone will crack the protection. All it takes is one copy on the Internet to ensure that anyone on a peer to peer network can get a copy.

    Sony is risking alienating a large number of people to stop a small number of pirates. Not just a small number of pirates, but the non-technical pirates. They are also annoying Walmart, Blockbuster, BestBuy and any other retailer who sells their DVDs. Who are the consumers going to complain to? The retailers.

    Oddly, this could cost them money even if you ignore retail backlash. Companies which rent DVDs to the consumer, purchase DVDs based on rental demand. If someone rents and burns a DVD, the movie company is pissed, but it still increases rental demand. Higher rental demand, increases sales of the DVDs to the companies who rent them. If someone finds they can't rent and burn, they probably will just download the image from BitTorrent rather than buy the DVD. Not to mention the people who can't play the Sony DVDs, they'll want a free version which actually works.

    Sony has the right to put any copy protection scheme they want on their DVDs, as long as it maintains compatibility. If you sell someone a product which is designed not to work properly on their DVD player, you better tell them first. Even if the consumer was willing to get firmware updates, do you think the manufacturers want to start sending out discs and supporting consumers through the update?

    1. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by guruevi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stranger Than Fiction, Casino Royale, and The Pursuit of Happyness

      There you go, now stop buying those darn DVD's and complaining that someone will crack the copy protection anyway. We KNOW, before it's even in stores you can get full DVD rips (yes, you can even get the full 4,7G download's if you look hard enough). And if I buy a DVD that doesn't play in my machine, without going through stuff like MacTheRipper or so (Johnny English for example) I return it to wherever I bought it and say it won't play (I take my PowerBook with me) and demand a refund.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by penguin_dance · · Score: 3, Informative

      This one is better:
      Casino Royale

      The link you posted has comments that the torrent is not authentic. Plus this one has a lot of seeds/peers.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    3. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by codemachine · · Score: 1

      And in the case of Casino Royale, and probably others, you should be able to get a better than DVD quality rip on the net at some point, due to the Blu-Ray release of the same movies. Not sure if Blu-Ray rips are showing up yet or not though.

    4. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by anup_at_mac · · Score: 1

      The cease and desist letter from your ISP is on its way .. please bend over the table while the MPAA lawyers screw you. Good luck.

    5. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by faedle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where this all breaks down, of course, is the fact that many commercial DVD copying tools already can "pad bad sectors" on read.

      My non-computer-tech neighbor (who is a Mac user like me) and I struck up a conversation at the mailbox when I got my Netflix discs recently. We talked about what movies we rent and buy, and he picked up a copy of Casino Royale at the video store down the street. It didn't work on his fairly new (Sony branded, I might point out) DVD player.. and..

      (here's the punchline)

      ".. Here's the part I don't understand. When it didn't work, I tried to copy it using Fast DVD Copy.. the copy works just fine, so I just play the copy."

      Sucks to be Sony. This guy had to have me help set up his DVD player, for cripes sake.

    6. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      This copy protection prevents most people from renting/borrowing a DVD and making a copy of it. Until people download the latest software for cracking it. This is mostly targetting non-technical people who were given DVD Shrink by a friend.

      If this is the typical "bad sectors at the beginning part with the lady holding a torch" DRM that Sony is so fond of, 'mencoder -ss 60' usually takes care of it. Just adjust the time to match the opening credits, and rip away. Mplayer accepts the same option if you just want to watch it.

    7. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by iainl · · Score: 1

      Blu-Ray rips showed up a good month ago, yes. One of them ABSOLUTELY DID NOT fall onto my 360 while I was trying to find out where on Earth my legitimate copy got lost in the post for a week. 720p WMV with 5.1 audio that fits perfectly on a single-layer DVD and looks bloody marvellous. APPARENTLY.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    8. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Funny, let them try though. First of all, I'm not a US Citizen, second of all, I have my own lawyer and I can rely on my employers' lawyer firm if necessary, third of all, I didn't even do anything wrong.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Prevents casual "rent and burn" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you dont have very good pirate friends.

      I give my friends the url to buy anyDVD. they buy it and get free updates that get's around this BS quite quickly. makes thier DVD shrink copy magically work all of the time.

      works great, all friends are happy as they dont have to travel with the real DVD's in the car.

      I grin every time because I made all of them into despicably dangerous and evil criminals that are causing global warming and supporting terrorism when they copy that DVD.

      Muahahahahaha!

      Get some better pirate friends, they will help you

  28. I suspected that was the problem.... by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

    Bought Pusuit of Happyness at Best Buy. I've got a Philips DVDR 3400 (with the update installed) and the disc would just play the promos and get to the main menu. But when I pushed play, the screen went black and froze. If you went to the scene selector you couldn't select any scene. Just took it back and got a replacement. Haven't gotten a chance to try it, but I expected it would work no better--this was the only time I've had a new disc not play. I plan to take it back to demand a refund.

    This is bullcrap that any company puts out discs and then expects players to "fix" their players.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  29. buy?? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    don't you love it, when you but a DVD, you get all the bonus commercials you HAVE to see before you can start the movie?

    you pay, you get added crap. you *cough* and you get the movie without crap.
    interesting dilemma.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:buy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah annoying that, i have some DVD single releases and instead of going straight to the meat, which i want to watch for like 3.5 mins im subjected to 30 seconds of wanky 80s 'Warner home video' title and associated sub Jan Hammer crappo track I can't skip.

      If CDs started to do this, can you imagine how few people would buy the bloody things.

      Just because you CAN do something, doesn't mean you SHOULD. I mean really do I fucking care this comes from Warner? Nope, couldn't be arsed even if came from Bob's Dodgy DVDs But No Crappy Unskippable Bits. As for adverts, right I'm really going to spend money on a DVD that shows me crap I'm not interested in. It's bad enough when i sign into amazon and see a recommendation (apparantly based on my purchases) for harry potter (never bought it, not interested) but at least im not forced to sit through a bloody advert.

      Its like sites with animated gifs or crappy flash ads. they get adblocked to hell. if they work out a way to block access unless we view the ads, then I'm off somewhere else. serve me quiet text/image ads and I'm happy. Arse about with my perhiperal vision and you go in the bin...

    2. Re:buy?? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      you pay, you get added crap. you *cough* and you get the movie without crap. interesting dilemma.

      No dilemma. No dilemma at all. The only reason there isn't more downloading going on is because there aren't more people that know how to do it. I mean, my goodness, if everyone that had a broadband connection knew how to install a BitTorrent client, head over to TorrentSpy or Mininova or The Pirate Bay and download stuff and knew about codecguide.com's Codec Packs so they could play all that media without any problems on their Windows boxes, why, I think we'd see a lot more people watching crap-free entertainment.

      You see, these are people that have long been accustomed to selling whatever they please, because they knew we had no choice but to accept it no matter how they chose to present it. If we wanted a movie, we took whatever they threw at us. That's changed, for now, and lawsuits, the DMCA and the rest aside, I don't think they've fully come to grips with that.

      don't you love it, when you but a DVD, you get all the bonus commercials you HAVE to see before you can start the movie?

      I've bought a lot of DVDs over the past eight or nine years. Lots of them. I like movies, I do. But I have to say, watching purchased DVDs has become similar to the experience I get at the local movie house: i.e., disappointing and not what it used to be. And both groups complain that sales are down. Cripes, what does it take to give these people a clue? The media companies dis their customers when those customers have alternate means of receiving their products (in this case, means that provide no revenue) and they expect sales to increase? Give me a break.

      It would surprise me if Sony executives ever got down from their ivory towers (or whatever the obviously isolated spot where they store their upper management) and spoke directly with typical consumers of their products to see what, if anything, said people like about Sony products. Oh, I'm sure Sony's marketing drones have plenty of "focus groups" and "surveys" and all the rest of the trappings of modern marketeering ... but they don't seem to be paying much attention upstairs.

      Media Marketing Rule #1 should be "if the customer BUYS THE DISC it should PLAY."

      This is not rocket science. This is about good business. It's about continuing to have a business.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:buy?? by Neon+Crossing · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've seen one of those that couldn't be skipped with the "Menu" button... annoying, yes, but not unavoidable.

      --
      -NC
    4. Re:buy?? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      But I have to say, watching purchased DVDs has become similar to the experience I get at the local movie house: i.e., disappointing and not what it used to be.

      I just watched 300 at a movie house in London. The tickets were 10 pounds each (20 dollars). There were half an hour of commercials beforehand. Yes, I had a watch, a full 30 minutes. Assuming 80 million viewers are worth 4 million dollars per minute (roughly the superbowl rate), that 20 dollars worth of my time (low professional rate) was sold off for an additional 1.5 dollars. So let's cut the difference and say that I spent 30 dollars to watch an hour-and-a-half long movie. There were two of us, so that makes 60 dollars.

      Yup. No clue why the movie houses are falling on harder times. None at all.

    5. Re:buy?? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      A local movie house here gave me almost fifty minutes of commercials, and they weren't movie trailers or anything interesting. Much of it was not even film or video but a slide show of advertising from local businesses (used car dealerships and such) with a lame voiceover. Really torqued me into a pretzel. After that I began showing up about half an hour after starting time, as did a lot of other people. They cottoned on to that rather quickly, and then began varying the actual starting time of the movie.

      So I stopped going there. But it just goes to show the mindset of the people running the entertainment industry today. I don't know if I believe the theater owner's complaints about how the studios don't leave them enough money from the ticket sales, and that they need the extra revenue from advertising and $5.00 bottles of water. However, even if it's true there's still something wrong.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  30. Pwned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony, you lose again.

    Should have at least included a firmware update on the DVD itself. Although then they'd still get complaints whenever the update failed and the machine bricked.

    Oh well, looks like another class action suit, a tiny slap on the wrist from the authorities, then business as usual.

  31. Just boicott Sony by viking80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony Electronics was a great company until the bought the movies division.

    Now, Sony Electronics tries to deliver great products, and Sony Pictures strongarm the electronics division into delivering defective products.

    Just stop buying Sony altogether (Movies and electronics) until they become a customer focussed company again.

    In the end the blame goes to the stupid Sony customers that allows Sony to sell them this defective crap, and then comes back for more.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Just boicott Sony by jabuzz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The irony is that Sony Electronics, purchased what became Sony Pictures because they had just spent a shed load of money developing DAT and MiniDISC for the media companies to refuse to release content on the new formats killing them dead. The idea was if they owned content then this would never again be a problem. Unfortunately they allowed the tail to wag the dog and it has all but ruined Sony electronics.

    2. Re:Just boicott Sony by owlnation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can I also add, that another of their entrepreneurial errors was to merge with Bertelsmann to create their music division Sony BMG.

      That's the bright folks that brought you their first copy protection scandal. And Bertelsmann were the first company to use DRM on CDs.

      (as an aside it's worth noting that Bertelsmann were involved with the Nazis and used Jewish slaves during WWII - they also lied about this all the way up to 2002),

      When people talk about MS being evil, it's important to realize that there are far more evil companies out there. Here, with Sony BMG you have pure evil. At least 100 years of unspeakable crimes in one of their divisions - all neatly packaged up as family friendly entertainment.

    3. Re:Just boicott Sony by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is one of the prime reasons that I haven't "upgraded" to HDTV yet. I'm still not convinced that the industry isn't going to fuck every single early adopter of the technology. Sony's misbehavior, in particular, is among the reasons that I haven't bought a PS3, didn't buy a Sony Receiver, and won't buy a Sony product in the future.

      Peter

    4. Re:Just boicott Sony by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Way back in the mid 80s to the mid 90s, Sony one of the best companies. I had one of the original Walkmans which I carried (unknown to the drill sergeants) thoughout basic training. I still use an Sony alarm clock I bought in 92. I also bought a sweet 15" flat screen monitor from them back in 95 (paid extra for it too), and it was worth every penny. I had it for years. Then in the late 90s, things started changing. At work, we got 17" and 19" Sony monitors. All of them fried in the first year and had to be replaced. Another 15" monitor I bought also fried in the first year, and I started avoiding sony products.

      Then there was the rootkit disaster, and now this. A brand new Sony DVD player that wont play brand new Sony DVDs?

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    5. Re:Just boicott Sony by geschild · · Score: 1

      I'm already doing this as much as I can. It's surprisingly difficult, though. You have to keep an eye out all the time to prevent one from buying stuff from one of the many Sony subsidiaries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sony_subsidi aries.

      Good luck to you on your 'quest'. Sony hasn't made anything half-decent in a long time and if they have a competitive product in a certain market (*cough*mobile phones*cough*) they're either making it with another company and/or in a field with incompetent competitors.

      Now to convince Joe Consumer that the glory days of Sony are long gone. ;)

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    6. Re:Just boicott Sony by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      The original Sony was a good company. They came to a massive rise in fame with the walkman. From there it was all downhill. Sony movies behaves just like sony electronics. They have always twisted the standards, tried to push their own agenda and generally released products that were ever-so-slightly incompatible with other manufacturers (I remember a sony VCR that could not be watched on anything other than a sony tv becuase it fiddled with the composite video output in some strange way that was apparantly the way of the future).

      Sony music/movies is just the logical progression of that!

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    7. Re:Just boicott Sony by klx · · Score: 1

      they have a competitive product in a certain market (*cough*mobile phones*cough*)

      Really? I have used something like 15 mobile phones over 9 years (job changes, network changes, heavy use, rainy climate) and the Sony Ericsson T616 was by far the worst phone I have ever used. Possibly the worst phone I've ever been in the same room with. Defective out of the box, glacial Java interface, and crummy components. I left it on my spare line for some time but had to ebay a broken T610 for parts.

    8. Re:Just boicott Sony by geschild · · Score: 1

      "...and the Sony Ericsson T616 was by far the worst phone I have ever used." I'm not going to argue with that, mostly since I've never owned a SE phone and won't buy one, as part of my boycott.

      SE phones are, however, currently quite popular and I'm not arrogant enough to disagree with a large number of obviously satisfied customers. I do think that this is more a result of the symbiosis between Ericsson en Sony than of Sony's doing, though.

      Anyway, you can boycott Sony for any reason you like, as long as you do ;).
      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    9. Re:Just boicott Sony by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      boicott?

      I think you need to buy a different vowel, unless this is meant as:

      Boicott: v. When a fanboi of a product/corp. boycotts the same corp/products.

      Either we've invented a new word and definition, or my spelling isn't worth a damn.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  32. Confirmed by stinerman · · Score: 1

    I can't watch Casino Royale on my PC. I tested it under Debian Sid using both Totem and Mplayer. xdvdshrink crapped out as did "dd if=/dev/hdc of=casinoroyale.iso".

    My resolution was to fire up Pan and head over to a.b.m.divx. Once again, paying customers get the shaft.

    1. Re:Confirmed by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I think it's very suspect. That movie played on both my friends and my Sony DVD player [don't know the model, but it ain't the 500-in-1 changer obviously]. It also played on my "Kaco" brand 30$ DVD player. It's entirely possible though that there are multiple runs of the DVD with different copy protections on them though.

      Either way, the movie sucks anyways, that it doesn't play isn't really that detrimental. That they found a new low in the DRM world is though.

      I especially love the "piracy is theft" anti-download nag at the beginning of the DVD. Oddly enough it's not part of the movie stream, so had you actually ripped the DVD, you'd never had seen it. Only legit paying customers are nagged to not not buy DVDs. And this is why I hunt and pick DVDs from amazon.com instead of buying the latest "blockbuster" that the studios tell me to (proud to have recently bought Tigerland hehehehehe).

      Did I also mention that Casino Royale sucks? Cuz it does. Smacks of gaydom and product placement the likes of which only American Idol could top.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't watch Casino Royale on my PC. I tested it under Debian Sid using both Totem and Mplayer. xdvdshrink crapped out as did "dd if=/dev/hdc of=casinoroyale.iso".

      ARccOS discs like Sony's can be played under mplayer by adding "-ss 10" to the mplayer command line. As a bonus, you get to skip the first 10 seconds of logo pollution in the movie.

      Since mplayer can rip anything that it can play, it goes without saying that ARccOS is as usual utterly ineffective in stopping piracy while causing no end of grief for legitimate customers.

    3. Re:Confirmed by mechsoph · · Score: 1

      Have you tried vobcopy or dvdbackup?

      Also, dd will skip bad sectors with `dd conv=noerror'. Useful option for reading those 10 year old floppies you find in a drawer.

  33. Sony arrogance to a new low by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    We Do Not Intend To Fix It

    Fair enough, we do not intend to support your arrogance. Welcome to our blacklist.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  34. I rented a Casino Royale DVD that didn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I returned it to BB complaining. They gave me another copy and it worked. I also later rented Stranger Than Fiction and it worked as well. I found this strange considering that I had chalked up the first one not working to copy protection. I also made the boneheaded mistake of putting the non-working Sony disc in my computer. Think before you act.

  35. Sony isn't alone in this ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    ... have some kind of 'feature' that makes them unplayable on many DVD players.

    Windows, for example, has many similar features, although most of us call them "bugs" or "exploits". But sure, if Sony wants to call a complete functional failure a "feature", that's okay by me.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  36. Simply return the Sony DVD's by tfg004 · · Score: 1

    Just return the Sony DVD's to the store and demand a refund for the malfunctioning DVD.

    1. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most stores wont do refund for an opened title - most will only exchange for the exact same title. However, you take the new one home, find it defective as well, then go back. If stores have to ship enough opened units back there will be some reaction, maybe. Assuming they dont just re-shrink wrap it and sell it again.

    2. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this. Yet I've also seen entire faulty batches of DVDs. Presumably if the store doesn't have a DVD from a non-faulty batch, all they can do is a credit note or a refund.

      There is a finite number of any given DVD in a store.

    3. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      The concept here is that a DVD that has DRM is 'faulty', and in this case they are designed to be 'faulty'. Plus, you have to take the one they replace your first 'faulty' one with home before you come back and say 'this one doesnt work either', and once you've come back twice, the store people are probably going to start saying your DVD player is defective and refuse to let you return it a second time.

    4. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by jimicus · · Score: 1

      My DVD player plays every other DVD, including another new one I bought last week.

      There have been bad batches of discs released. What's to say this isn't another?

    5. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Yer arguging with the wrong person :P I'm just telling you, its very likely the teenage customer service clerk isnt going to have the authorization to let you keep returning the same disc (or give you a refund as opposed to a same-title replacement), and the aging store manager who doesnt have a clue what DRM is is going to tell you 'sorry, store policy', and isnt going to give a fig when you threaten not to shop there anymore.

    6. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the country you're in, but here in the UK we have a law called the Sale of Goods Act.

      Briefly, "goods must be fit for the purpose for which they are sold". You can't sell someone a hammer which is softer than any nail on the market.

      I'd say a DVD which may or may not play and it's potluck whether or not it will isn't fit for purpose. And the Sale of Goods act trumps any store policy, I don't care what the spotty teenager thinks.

      That's the law. That being said, I've noticed a trend recently to instruct store managers in company policy but not tell them how the sale of goods act works, so you wind up having to argue that you don't give a damn about company policy, you're not returning the goods under company policy, you're returning them because they're unfit for purpose. Such arguments tend to be more effective when carried out slightly louder than normal speaking voice in a crowded store.

    7. Re:Simply return the Sony DVD's by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I'm here in the US. We have the 'If there is the remote possibility that any policy might allow someone to (OMG!) STEAL valuable music or video from the labe^H^H^H^H'artist' then we cant allow it.'

      Letting someone return opened CD's or DVD's would make it trivial to buy them, make a rip/copy, then return them.

  37. Bait and Switch by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, Phillips did the enforcing on CD encoding standards because of their trademark control. The DVD industry has no internal standards enforcement, so this mihgt be the time to bring in external enforcement, namely the courts. If the box says "DVD" it should play in a DVD player. Sonys product is only DVD-like and as such should not be legal to sell as a DVD. It would be like a gas station selling ethanol but calling it gasoline, sure it still works in some vehicles, but it's not the same product.

    --
    We are all just people.
    1. Re:Bait and Switch by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, well, in the U.S. at least we'll probably have to wait until we can get in that new President and Congress we ordered. The current ones are malfunctioning and in need of replacement.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Bait and Switch by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just draw a line around the perimeter of Washington DC with a magic marker. That'll fix it.

    3. Re:Bait and Switch by Tokerat · · Score: 0, Troll

      There was supposed to be a patch for that back in 2004, but it keeps getting pushed back while we work to develop new weapons technologies, and to fix all those bugs in our middle east release. It could be another year or so before they announce a date.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    4. Re:Bait and Switch by cmdrpaddy · · Score: 1

      Just update the firmware, everybody's doing it!

    5. Re:Bait and Switch by Kjella · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would that be the blast radius? If so, you forgot step 2.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Bait and Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, oh man, that's hilarious, mod up +1 funny.

      Joe sixpack 'catching on'? That's a good one. The average american consumer is a spoon-fed troglodyte who drinks pabst and watches wrestling. (not to mention Fox News)

      This is why companies get away with so much crap.

    7. Re:Bait and Switch by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 1

      I think it has to be a green felt-tip pen for that to work. Another option is to cryogenically freeze Washington, DC, and then slowly bring it back to room temperature to remove any defects in the crystalline structure from the manufacturing process.

    8. Re:Bait and Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, pro-wrestling ratings have crashed.

    9. Re:Bait and Switch by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You got your new congress just after the new year. Same dumb fucks, different name. I have no doubt that a Democratic president would be just as painful to watch.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    10. Re:Bait and Switch by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the sitting president has fuck all to do with the court system.

    11. Re:Bait and Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the mixed martial arts ratings (UFC, K1, etc)? It's wrestling in another guise.

    12. Re:Bait and Switch by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Justice Department, motherfucker, have you heard of it? If we'd had a President who appointed an AG like Eliot Spitzer, rather than a political hack with a taste for bureaucratic fuckery, I tend to think Sony et al. would think twice about pulling shit like this.

    13. Re:Bait and Switch by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are familiar with the part of the Constitution detailing how the supreme court justices are appointed, right? In many ways a President's most lasting influence on the country is in his justices, most everything else can be changed by the next president or congress if they desire.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    14. Re:Bait and Switch by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you seen the mixed martial arts ratings (UFC, K1, etc)? It's wrestling in another guise.

      No, not really. Wrestling is an 'exhibition' and the results are pre-determined.

      MMA, on the other hand, is state-regulated. In most states, the state boxing commission regulates the sport and has a representative on-hand at every MMA match, and any promoter who got caught fixing a fight the way they do in wrestling would likely lose his license.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    15. Re:Bait and Switch by 0123456789 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 'cos the mob have never been involved in boxing...

    16. Re:Bait and Switch by Mike89 · · Score: 1

      Would that be the blast radius? If so, you forgot step 2.
      Whoosh.
    17. Re:Bait and Switch by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      Step 1. Nuke Washington D.C.
      Step 2. ?
      Step 3. Democracy!

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    18. Re:Bait and Switch by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      Why wait?

      insurrection23128@FederalGovernment:~$sudo shutdown -r now

    19. Re:Bait and Switch by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I'm picking a nit, but Congress can remove Supreme Court justices, too.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    20. Re:Bait and Switch by dpilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll say it more delicately than the other guy who got moderated "flamebait!"

      While many aspects may have been indistinguishable between Bush and Gore/Kerry, there are still many which are. While it's not clear that 9/11 wouldn't have happened with Gore in office, it's entirely possible. The current administration steadfastly and deliberately ignored the Middle East until 9/11. (Their #1 priority was getting out of the ABM treaty so they could begin testing and deploying the stuff.) Then there's the Clean Air Act, Katrina, not to mention Iraq. (And I haven't even mentioned Peak Oil or greenhouse.)

      No matter how Libertarian or Progressive you want to think you are, you simply can't say that there is no distinction whatsoever between Democrats and Republicans.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    21. Re:Bait and Switch by JasonTik · · Score: 1

      He must have thought everyone already knew that step 2 is ???.

    22. Re:Bait and Switch by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 'cos the mob have never been involved in boxing... Christ, do you have a brain stack one byte deep? Whether an MMA match has ever been secretly "thrown" is fucking irrelevant. "Pro wrestling" is theater. Every single match is a choreographed performance. MMA matches are a competition. Yes, people have been know to cheat in competitions, but so what? They don't sit down before every MMA match and decide who is going to pretend to hit who with a tire iron while the ref pretends to be distracted.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    23. Re:Bait and Switch by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It's all just entertainment, wether the outcome is prearranged or not.

    24. Re:Bait and Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Wikipedia is correct, your nit has 2 zits on it:

      1) Senate != Congress
      2) Supreme court justices, like other officials, can only be impeached for: "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." Stupidity didn't make the list.

    25. Re:Bait and Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hate to wake u up but half the campaigns against sex and violence in media/crusades against video games are led by democrats. they are led by the same idiots as well. you trust their judgment on this? naw they won't protect us from squat while they need money for their campaigns.

      whats a democratic constituency? hollywood. hollywood LOVES drm. we are screwed.

    26. Re:Bait and Switch by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, in the U.S. at least we'll probably have to wait until we can get in that new President and Congress we ordered. The current ones are malfunctioning and in need of replacement. Personally, I'm waiting for a forcefully inserted firmware update....
      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    27. Re:Bait and Switch by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      So basically wrestling is like watching a fight scene in a movie...
      Only for people who just want the action and none of the dialog.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    28. Re:Bait and Switch by putaro · · Score: 1

      Impeachment is a political process. If you can get the votes to impeach you can make it for any kind of "crime" you want.

    29. Re:Bait and Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sit on a fucking red hot poker and spin, you cocksucking motherfucker. Reps and Dems are all the same fucking thing, and dipshit, pedophiliac cum gulping shit stains like you will never get that. Die, you filthy sack of pigshit. Just drop the fuck dead. YOU ARE USELESS!

    30. Re:Bait and Switch by volkris · · Score: 1

      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.

      Or, more concretely, democracy is a white mob hanging a black man.

      You sure you want democracy as your goal there?

    31. Re:Bait and Switch by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, in the U.S. at least we'll probably have to wait until we can get in that new President and Congress we ordered. The current ones are malfunctioning and in need of replacement.

      Do no hold your breath. The Democrats are now moving as fast as they can to be as corrupt as the Republicans. Dianne Feinstein is already 0wned by the movie and record industry.

      --

      Religion is the main cause of atheism.

    32. Re:Bait and Switch by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      I personally believe that the only way to affect change in the goverment would be to elect an entirely new Senate, House, and President. Make campaign accounting public so the public knows where the money came from and where the money went.

      This way, there will be no vested interests, not having the idealists undercut by the entrenched powers that be etc. We also need to cap the stay of congressment to a fixed term no Senator-for-life.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  38. Easy by RealEstateGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Buy a copy, open, find out the DVD is "broken" take back for exchange. Rinse - Repeat a few times. If everyone does this they'll fix it.

  39. what about us? by Bizzeh · · Score: 1

    it's up to the manufacturers to update their hardware

    what about the rest of us, who already have DVD players? we have to buy all new ones, to watch sonys new DVD's?
    1. Re:what about us? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "What about the rest of us, who already have DVD players? we have to buy all new ones, to watch sonys new DVD's?"

      Why would watching the products of a corporation that displays such utter contempt for you provoke anything but utter contempt in return???

      When you buy their stuff you reward them for screwing you over. Don't buy their stuff. _I_ don't buy their stuff.
      You aren't missing information, just some specific popular entertainment. It's not like boycotting Sony would make your life worse.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  40. ARCCOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    These discs feature Sony's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARccOS_Protection ARCCOS, which doesn't work with some DVD players and cannot be ripped by any program under Linux.

    1. Re:ARCCOS by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You got to love how it comes full circle - disks with corrupt sectors? This reminds me of some floppy protection schemes from the 1980s. Also how the page lists half a dozen tools that'll get around it. If there's one thing worse than DRM, it's when they try to "fix" a broken system by making non-standard discs which break normal players while the patching tools get updated to work around it. Same thing with the "CDs" which don't play in CD players. The cat is out of the bag. The horse has left the barn. The genie is out of the bottle. The referee has blown the whistle. The fat lady has sung. He's dead, Jim. You're flogging a dead horse. Are there any more ways to say it? It's OVER. Get some therapy for your denial issues and let it be.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:ARCCOS by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Did you actually try ripping one under Linux or do you just say it because none is listed on wikipedia?

      I ask because just about all DVD progs on Linux use libdvdread/libdvdcss to access the DVD. And if VLC supports those DVDs (according to wp) all others should - in theory (in theory there's no difference between etc. =)- do so, too (iirc the VLC project even originated those two libs).

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    3. Re:ARCCOS by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a matter of degree. CSS encryption, for example, really didn't have much impact on ordinary users of the DVD. The discs played and the encryption stopped the vast majority of people trying to copy the media using ordinary copy programs. Frankly, I believe that's all CSS was ever meant to achieve, and it did. They knew that sooner or later it would get broken and you know what? It was broken, and Joe Average still hasn't a clue how to copy that disc he just bought or rented so it's still doing its job. Many seem to count CSS as a failure the moment DVD Jon figured it out, but the fact of the matter is that CSS was a success and still is to this very day.

      The problem is not so much the DRM (bad as it is) but that in their neverending quest to prevent copyright infringement (pardon me, "theft of their intellectual property") they've begun to deny legitimate purchasers of their product the ability to actually use that for which they plunked down good money. Oh, I'm sure Sony figured out well in advance that some number of purchasers would get screwed, but decided that the risk was acceptable. I guarantee it won't be acceptable to me, if I ever mistakenly happen to buy a Sony Pictures DVD.

      This has got to run afoul of more than a few laws, and it sure as hell isn't a good way to run a business.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:ARCCOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I tried AcidRip with Casino Royale - didn't work. If you know a DVD ripping tool under Linux that does work with an ARCCOS disk, I'd like to know.

    5. Re:ARCCOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can play the dvd with vlc under linux, then you can rip it as well, simply because vlc allow you to dump the content. It's not straighforward, you'll need probably to play with the command line options, but it's feasable.

    6. Re:ARCCOS by Tack · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... which doesn't work with some DVD players and cannot be ripped by any program under Linux.

      This isn't quite true, at least for certain definitions of "ripped." I know someone (not me of course) who initially had troubles dd'ing a Greys Anatomy DVD (damaged by ARccOS) but had no problems ripping the tracks individually using mplayer (i.e. mplayer dvd://1 -dumpstream -dumpfile 1.mpg). I'm sure mencoder would have worked fine too, for transcoding.

    7. Re:ARCCOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hate to break it to them, but I've ripped both Stranger than Fiction and Casino Royale under Linux. I believe that I just used the play_cell program, which is part of the vamps package to rip the uncorrupted chapters and then concatenated them together.

    8. Re:ARCCOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Casino Royale DVD plays fine in Xine, but the mplayer trick doesn't seem to work - the disk keeps spinning but only about 15MB is ripped (the MGM Lion and Columbia Lady). The mplayer trick usually works a treat when I trip over exciting discs. mplayer is happy ripping tracks 2-9 (of 11). It's also happy playing the disc, but only if you hit the right arrow key to skip the transition from the Columbia Lady to the content.

      Xine is maybe happy due to many of these log messages:

      *** Zero check failed in ifo_read.c:618
              for cell_position[i].zero_1 = 0x04

      BTW: I got the DVD version to compare to the Blu-ray version so it was a bit disconcerting for the first minute or so to find it in grainy black and white.
    9. Re:ARCCOS by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 2, Informative
      These discs feature Sony's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARccOS_Protection ARCCOS, which doesn't work with some DVD players and cannot be ripped by any program under Linux.

      Hmm, didn't stop me.

      -rw-r--r-- 1 elf users 964885536 2007-04-14 14:59 /movies/pursuit_of_happyness.avi
      Just give mplayer or mencoder the -ss option. I think this one needed about 150 seconds, longer than most of the other Sony DRM failures and probably the reason it doesn't work on some players. Normally it's only about 30 seconds into the movie that they put the bad sectors.
    10. Re:ARCCOS by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure how you came up with that last statement as the article you link to states:

      The system deliberately creates a number of sectors on the DVD with corrupted data that cause DVD copying software to produce errors. Normal DVD players never read these sectors since they follow a set of instructions encoded on the disc telling them to skip them. Less sophisticated DVD playing programs do not follow these instructions and instead try to read every sector on the disk sequentially, including the bad ones. Slysoft's AnyDVD, Fengtao's DVDFab Decrypter, RipIt4Me + DVD Decrypter + FixVTS + DVD Shrink, MacTheRipper (freeware), and VLC media player (for Linux) are usually able to overcome ARccOS protection.

      Yes, VLC for Linux is usually able to overcome this protection. VLC does transcoding. Next question?
      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    11. Re:ARCCOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ripped Stanger than Fiction and Casino Royal using DVDRip. It slows down the DVD drive speed and skips the bad sectors so it takes 15 minutes to rip the DVD instead of 12 minutes.

      They only worked in 1 of my DVD players but now they work on all my TV's thanks to MythTV.

    12. Re:ARCCOS by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      Casino Royale plays just fine under mplayer, so I have to believe that mencoder can rip it, although I did not actually do so.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    13. Re:ARCCOS by Lumpy · · Score: 1



      1) Rip Movie to Hard Drive using DVDFab Decrypter
      2) Run those files through FixVTS
      3) then process with Shrink as you normally would

      I did all of this with vmware under linux.

      Honestly I am sure someone will have a set of tools for native linux soon, but who watches DVD's under linux. rip to Xvid and take the files with you... far more convenient.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:ARCCOS by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      I believe they fully realize that it is over as far as DVD protection goes. Next step is to slowly and increasingly "break" DVD's like this, causing a lot of shee^H^H^H^Hconsumers to think that their dvd player is broken. Maybe, just maybe, they'll go ahead and buy that BluRay player since they need another one anyway.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    15. Re:ARCCOS by bazorg · · Score: 1
      which doesn't work with some DVD players and cannot be ripped by any program under Linux.

      not even dd?

  41. This is GREAT! by AlphaLop · · Score: 1
    Now that lame DRM is going to start screwing with "Mainstream" consumers maybe something will be done about it. DRM has been allowed to get this out of control because 'Joe Consumer' was not impacted by it, mostly just gamers and geeks.

    When some congressman or his Aunt Ethel starts having to deal with the same issues we have been fighting with for years I bet something gets done!

    Between this and the rootkit fiasco I am starting to think Sony needs to be put on medication or at least on a 48 hour hold for observation because they are obviously suicidal.

    --
    It's only paranoia if your wrong...
  42. Why, oh why? by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do manufacturers do this? I so would buy more DVDs if they weren't so bizarely priced and if I could rely on feature and quality stability. The movie industry would make tons of money. But no, they have to piss off their customers as much as possible. Would anybody of you give a damn about Bittorrent if each DVD would cost 8 dollars, come with all the extras, no CSS and no Region Code? I wouldn't. Sony and Co. would earn themselves a golden nose in the movie after-market called DVD-sales. But no, they have to chase away customers with crappy copies, a totally bizar publishing policy and DRM schemes that brink on the criminal. People go through all the bittorrent fuss just to get a movie. That should ring a bell with the execs. Then again, as proven before, probably only Steve Jobs is smart enough to see this.
    I hope Sony Entertainment chokes and dies on their new DVDs.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Why, oh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. In the last eight years I haven't rented or purchased a single video. As long as the movie industry (and record industry for that matter) continue to lobby for ridiculous copyright laws and continue to push their crazy DRM schemes, they're not getting any money from me. I used to watch movies and listen to music all the time. Now I read. Perhaps it's for the best.

  43. Another reason to never buy Sony again by jgercken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find Sony's tactics deplorable and am offended by their pompous arrogance and complete lack of remorse. They have/are taking advantage of the good faith vendor-consumer relationship and don't deserve my business anymore. Screw em I have other options.

    --
    Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately attributed to ignorance. -Napoleon
  44. Does Handbrake work? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Were you trying to rip it as a straight ISO, using Disk Utility or something? Or were you using a specialized DVD ripping program?

    I'm really curious as to whether HandBrake works with these broken DVDs, because at least for most Mac users I know, that's their primary ripping tool (and IMO the best all-in-one, free, GPLed, ripper I've worked with).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Does Handbrake work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Handbrake does not (at least for me) work with these DVDs, though Mac the Ripper does. It's a shame, because I really prefer Handbrake for just about everything, but what can you do.

  45. Return Every One of Them by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every DVD that doesn't play, opened or not, is defective. DVD players are a well-known quantity now. After Sony starts getting returns in the tens and hundreds of thousands back, they might change their mind. And if they refuse to accept even a single one for a full refund, then I expect to see the Mother of All Class Actions Suits launched against them. At some point, Sony just has to go down once and for all. They're a terrible example to every other manufacturer.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Return Every One of Them by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I rather prefer the idea of the stores got together in a class action lawsuit.

      I bet you anything you like Walmart won't accept several thousand vouchers to give them a free Sony Pictures DVD of their choice.

  46. Time to buy some DVD's... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2

    ...And return them. Wash, rinse, repeat...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Time to buy some DVD's... by aonaran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...and do it at Walmart.
      There are a few resons for this...
      #1 walmart will always give you a refund or exchange
      #2 it's a hassle for Walmart too (2 birds 1 stone)
      #3 if Walmart tells Sony they won't carry it anymore Sony will cave.

  47. Little light on evidence? by PikachuMolester2007 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else find the summary a little bit light on the whole "evidence" thing? There's one amazon help thread and a blog with only one post (suspiciously named "Sony Strikes Again"?). Don't you think we should look a bit more into this, you know, before getting all up in arms? This kinda stuff is how FUD gets started.

    1. Re:Little light on evidence? by killercoder · · Score: 1

      Ahem, courtesy of google:

      http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?p=4916582#post4916582
      http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/strangerthanfict ion.php
      http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200704 05071706AA5ai4P

      The problem is widespread, and lo-and-behold software is available that lets a PC not only play it, but rip it.

      Killer

  48. "Th more you tighten your grip, by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

    Ken Kataguri, the more customers will slip through your fingers."

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  49. Overreactioning again... by Mongoose · · Score: 0, Troll

    Welcome to Digg 2.0... this appears to just be SONY / Toshiba players having issues playing a disc that works on other players. It's clearly not some new DRM scheme if it works on existing players. =)

    If I post a blog saying how stupid slashdot has become with any stupid meme is the OMG truthyness. Why not post about the possible Red Ring of Death from the Guitar Hero II patch too? I love how the internet and blogs are being used to spread a bunch of half-assed rumors like this. At some point you have to take a step back before hitting that 'OMG sumbit story to digg/slash', and see if it's even a valid concern or some asshat marketing firm/fanboy.

    1. Re:Overreactioning again... by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      If it is sony players, its not all sony players. Casino royale works on my 6 month old sony dvd/vcr combo. As I recall, I did have some problems playing it with xine or with windows media player in vista. Then again, that could be my NEC drive not liking their new protection scheme. Its hard to place blame without all the facts.

    2. Re:Overreactioning again... by Mongoose · · Score: 1

      Are you fucking stupid? Read the amazon.com fourm which the rumor used as a basis of claim. If the DVD plays on samsung / jvc / etc and NOT on a SONY -- how the fuck do you get it's some new DRM scheme from SONY on the disc being the problem? It's clearly an issue with the pressing and/or player. Think.

    3. Re:Overreactioning again... by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Dude.....

      I own a LG - DVT418 home theater and these disks wont play on that. I've returned 2 disks to Blockbuster, and filed 2 reports to Netflix for 'broken disks'.

      After the second disk, I put two-and-two together and figured it was some DRM scheme and started complaining. I can however watch them on my Linux machine, but the wife prefers to watch DVD's on the main telly... I guess I have no choice but to rip and re-author them to use my DVD player.

    4. Re:Overreactioning again... by gratemyl · · Score: 1

      No need to over-react.

      You cannot be sure. As others mentioned, it may be that the spec is ambiguous.

      It could be that the DRM scheme is compat. with some players and not with others, for example...

      While I agree that Sony is stupid for not testing their DRM scheme with their own player, we cannot simply conclude "it is not the DRM scheme".

      P.S. I know I should not react to trolls, but...

      --
      hackerkey://v4sw5/7BCHJMPRUY$hw3ln3pr6/7FOP$ck6ma8+9u6L$w4/7CGUXm0l6DLRi82NCe3+9t5Sb7HMOPRen5a17s0DSr1/2p-3.62/-5.23g3/5
  50. not just DVDs by nierd · · Score: 1

    I recently (this weekend) picked up God of War 2 for the PS2 - it does not play in my PS2 - even though I own 20 PS2 games (several of which are as new as God of War 2) and they all play without issue. When calling the number for tech support - they say it's due to the laser on the machine getting old (because we all know the lifespan of an LED is less than 2 years right?) - even though I can play any dual layer dvd I through into it as well as any *other* PS2 game. I would say Sony is doing this to many of thier titles...

    1. Re:not just DVDs by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      When calling the number for tech support - they say it's due to the laser on the machine getting old

      Actually this is a huge problem with optical drives - the laser/receptor assembly deteriorates over time and when it does deteriorate it will start failing to read DVDs at the margins of readability. You ought to be able to just return the DVD for a new one unless there was a problem with the master. Depending on how bold you are you might also open up the unit (disconnect it from the mains and everything else before you do this) and clean the lenses with a Q-Tip (or Cotton Bud as we call them in Australia) and rubbing alcohol. If some dust or grime has accumulated on the lens this may improve your ability to read marginal DVDs.

  51. MOD parent UP by Bananatree3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    mod parent up

  52. I buy Casino Royal(e)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is working in all my DVD player and I dont have any problem to rip it and burn it on a 4.7g dvd for my archive.

    1. Re:I buy Casino Royal(e)... by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

      It's because you don't have Sony DVD Player

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  53. And in the not to distant future.... by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

    Late breaking news....

    This just in off the Slashdot wire - Hackers and pirates from all over the world seem fixated on DVD's, in particular those from the entertainment giant Sony Entertainment. Sources close to the mafia are adamant that the huge drop in DVD sales over night is a direct result of the attack, there was no comment on the unrelated story regarding billions of DVD players mysteriously ceasing to play their new releases.

  54. As per wikipedia by Pranab · · Score: 1

    "ARccOS had reportedly been discontinued by Sony in February of 2006." So they've obviously realised their folly - or perhaps moved to a worse one?

    1. Re:As per wikipedia by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      They have moved to ArcCotangent which basically fucks you in the same bodily orifice, but from a different direction

  55. A patch for this bug can be found here: by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    http://bittorrent.com/

    Sarcasm aside, I noticed even with someone else's "legit" copy (I wouldn't call sony a legitimate business any more) on their DVD player that could play it, there was an extremely annoying faint rectangular pattern moving from right to left across the screen almost all the time. Anyone else noticed it?

    1. Re:A patch for this bug can be found here: by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 2, Funny

      there was an extremely annoying faint rectangular pattern moving...across the screen almost all the time

      I'm pretty sure they call that "a Hollywood movie"...

  56. Easy Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People could

    1. Rip it (I'm sure someone has probably already cracked the new copy protection, or is at least working on it)
    2. Remove the copy protection
    3. Burn it to a disk.

    That's easy isn't it? :)

  57. So Long Sony by bratwiz · · Score: 1


    So long Sony. Nice knowing ya... When mfgr's take in your face attitudes, people say "fuck 'em" and route around 'em.

  58. Sony DVD/HDD recorders by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Man, these are kinda defective anyways. I am in the market for a nice DVD/HDD recorder with HDMI, but will not consider a Sony. One of my family members has a 2 month old Sony HDMI recorder, and man it is slow! Slow to turn on, start/finish recording, load/eject a disk, switch between DVD and HDD, etc. Slow at everything! The menus are so slow that wrong items are often selected due to the lag. Egad! The only cool thing is that is controls the DV camera nicely with its one touch DV record (rewinds DV tape, records movie, rewinds tape again). I am unsure what is a good alternative brand with decent HDMI upscaling that won't kill my budget.

  59. I have to solution! by bflong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, your dvd's don't work? Sony says tough? Ok, here's the fix:

    Stranger Then Fiction http://thepiratebay.org/search/Stranger%20Than%20F iction/0/0/100,200,300,400,600/
    Casino Royale http://thepiratebay.org/search/Casino%20Royale/0/0 /0/
    The Pursuit Of Happiness http://thepiratebay.org/search/The%20Pursuit%20of% 20Happyness/0/0/0/

    Isn't that easier then screwing around with a stupid broken DVD?

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    1. Re:I have to solution! by Berserker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Works for me! I'm already boycotting anything related to RIAA. It's a negigible task to also boycott all sony products.

    2. Re:I have to solution! by Matt+Perry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't that easier then screwing around with a stupid broken DVD?
      I think the easier thing is to stop buying their products and stop watching their movies. There are plenty of other companies vying for your entertainment dollars that aren't trying to make your life more difficult.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:I have to solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the easier thing is to stop buying their products and stop watching their movies.

      Correct. Screw 'em. The only vote one has that means a damn is where you spend your money (and who's money you will take, if you have the option)

      What amazes me is why after funding the RIAA, MPAA and laws like the DMCA people are still buying the Sony products.

  60. Legit players:0, DeCSS: 1 by dbitter1 · · Score: 1

    I can personally say I got the Casino Royale DVD (from Netflix) and it didn't play on either of two set-top boxes (a Tivo and some generic DVD player I got for $30). Pissed as hell, brought it down to my PC, and VLC and Media Player Classic both played it like a charm. I usually watch about 75% of my movies on the PC anyway- and on every occasion that I bother to sit on my couch and try it on "consumer" equipment, I am just apalled by the anti-piracy warnings, threats, forced previews, and other crap they felch on us. It is getting to difficult to event try... now where are those MythTV live CDs?

    --
    For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
  61. Fancy a laugh by theeddie55 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ive got casino royale and having read this decided to try it on all the dvd players in my house (i live in a student house of computer scientists and engineers) so having tried it on going on for a dozen different players, the only player ive found that wont play it is a... guess which manufacturer (for those who dont want to play, its sony)

    1. Re:Fancy a laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, Sony DVD R+/- discs now come with DRM preinstalled...

  62. Mossberg got Sony right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mossberg got Sony right when commenting on the all the crapware they put on their PCs:

    "The problem is a lack of respect for the consumer. The manufacturers don't act as if the computer belongs to you."

    http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/ptech-20070405.html

    Not your computer, not the "CD" you just bought, nor your DVD, nor anything else. They didn't even respect the EULA for the LAME code they used either.

    Sony do not respect the public. The public should return the sentiment.

  63. DMCA takedown notice by adolf · · Score: 1

    FWIW:

    Anyone afflicted with this problem who has a Windows box to toy with can easily make a backup using a recent version of anydvd and DVD Shrink. The free trial of anydvd will suffice, for a week or two anyway, and dvdshrink is free. DVD Shrink will happily produce a directory full of IFOs and VOBs for burning with the utility of your choice, or it can use DVD Decryptor (also free) or Nero to burn automatically.

    The backup will be functionally-identical to the original, except for such features as copy protection, CSS encryption, and regional coding, all of which will be gone.

    Anyone care to offer a similar workaround for Linux and/or OSX? (BitTorrent doesn't count.)

    1. Re:DMCA takedown notice by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Well, I use dvdbackup which works very well. You can combine that with dvd+rw-tools to burn the rip back to DVD. There are also many tools available that shrink DVD9's to DVD5's so that you don't need to waste money on overpriced dual-layer DVDs such as k9copy (KDE), vamps (command line), and dvd95 (GNOME).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  64. Sony DVD by H316 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I too have problems have problems playing Sony with my Toshiba DVD player. I bought Casino Royale and no go. I returned the DVD and the same thing. Then I rented "Happyness." Same problem. After much button pressing, I found that pressing the "Top Menu" button gets me to the menu. I put the DVD in my computer and got a program instead of the DVD player. I hope I don't have a root kit on my machine. Remind me to *never* again buy *any* Sony product.

  65. P2P isn't the only source of illegal copies. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see a lot of people saying that encryption is futile because all it takes is one person breaking the encryption for it to be all over the internet. This is certainly true, but I don't think that's the kind of piracy Sony is trying to stop with these particular measures. They're probably just trying to make it a pain in the ass for me to pop a rented DVD into my PowerBook and rip or copy it, for myself or my friends. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who don't use p2p (either because they don't have the bandwidth, or they're intimidated by the MPAA, or they think it's immoral), but wouldn't hesitate to burn a copy for a friend. After all, even the courts considered that "fair use" for cassettes at some point, didn't they?

    1. Re:P2P isn't the only source of illegal copies. by faedle · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about it is...

      I couldn't play a rented copy of Casino Royale on my (old and crappy) DVD player. I stuck it in my Mac, used a freeware DVD ripper, burned it back out using Roxio Toast, and watched the COPY on my crappy DVD player.

      Good move there, Sony.

    2. Re:P2P isn't the only source of illegal copies. by tripslash · · Score: 0

      ... but wouldn't hesitate to burn a copy for a friend. After all, even the courts considered that "fair use" for cassettes at some point, didn't they?

      IIRC, no, once legally purchased, you are allowed one personal "fair use" working copy, assuming you store the original away for safekeeping (LPs at first, then cassettes). The courts never deemed it okay to make multiple copies for yourself/buddies/whoever.

      Also, if you sell the original (or otherwise relinquish your purchased rights), you are supposed to destroy any copy(ies) you may have made, since you no longer have any right to the work in question.

      Oh yeah, IANAL, and this pertains to the USA of my youth, some time ago.

    3. Re:P2P isn't the only source of illegal copies. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that this isn't strictly legal per se (although you could argue fair use), but it's not a criminal offence. The copyright holders would have to sue and demonstrate damages

    4. Re:P2P isn't the only source of illegal copies. by tripslash · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's my understanding, too. I should have said that the courts have left it to the copyright holder. There are no laws giving this permission.

  66. Do you have deja vu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sony is adding dodgy bits to cd's to make them "uncopyable", thereby pissing off regular users while the pirates shrug indifferently and find a fix/workaround in 5 minutes flat? Gee, I've never heard of sony doing something like *that* before.

    Oh, wait... dvd you say?

  67. I wonder if it's the zero length cell issue. by LaughingLinuxMan · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it's the zero length cell protection scheme with which the handbrake folks have been fighting.

    http://handbrake.m0k.org/forum/viewtopic.php?start =30&t=266

    -LLM

  68. dfgadf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just about to the point where I might have bought a Sony item again, but this just renews my resolve. Thanks, Sony.

  69. Problem Solved by segedunum · · Score: 1

    I solved this very problem. I rented Casino Royale and discovered that the thing just screwed my DVD player when I tried to play it. Since I'd payed for renting, I ripped it with Ripit4me and got into a DVD format that wasn't crippled as hell. It seems that this is Sony's never ending, and fruitless, quest to try and prevent file on the DVD being recognised, faffing about with the chapters (it takes a long time to play, if at all) and filling it with garbage IFOs. It's a very badly mastered DVD basically.

    Since I don't want to buy a totally crippled DVD with piss-poor explanations of why, and an easy fix, I'm now not going to buy it. Nice one Sony!

  70. Give the DVDs a bad Amazon review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A good chance to perform a consumer service that will help others avoid this problem.

    Go to Amazon, and give the movies bad reviews. State clearly that the movies themselves aren't necessarily bad, but the DVDs have a new copy protection scheme that will make them unplayable on many DVD players of different manufacturers.

    Also, find other people's reviews like this, and make sure you mark that they were helpful, so they shop up on top. That will get the word out.

  71. Not quite, I know all about this one. by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    True Philips did state that any CD that did not conform to the Red Book specification exactly could not use the CD logo, but the response from the music industry was less then thrilling. They reply was basically "so what?" - the argument was that if it was 12cm wide and shiny people would put in their player anyhow, and they did.

    Copy Protection on audio CDs was always a less than satisfactory method anyhow - relying on part Orange Book multi session TOCs with looping or non-existent sessions or degraded EFM, interleave or error correction (of course Red Book players would ignore such things and data players would kill the audio or disc). What has killed audio copy protection is market forces, some labels have already dropped it and others look to be doing the same.

    Conventional CD audio player (Red Book) are largely removed from the market, nowadays all CD player also play MP3 - in other words they are data CD players (Orange Book) in order to read the ISO9660 or UDF format and hence read the MP3 files. When this shift happened - we started dropping classic audio systems from the CD players we made in about 2002, and the market took a few years to follow - the industry suddenly found that a *very* large percentage of the hardware could not play their discs so the copy protection was dropped. That and the fact it was massively unpopular.

    I remember sitting in lectures from the IPFI when they clearly stated that the CD patents from Philips would expire some day and people did not give a damn about the logo or not. The IPFI certainly did not, and as long as Philips got the license money neither did they. Certainly CD copy protection never made the job of building CE audio equipment any harder - we ignored it largely.

    Now we have the same again, as Sony has changed the format of the DVD system slightly for *enhanced* copy protection - there is a slight difference as they also have patents on DVD as well as Philips and others. There are only a few things that can happen here :-

    1. The people who make DVD systems will alter their FW and that takes a while to reach the market - but (trust me on this) the teams involved in most firms have had sample discs with encoding on for quite some time.

    2. Market forces will force Sony into a humiliating reverse *if* sufficient publicity and bad press can be generated. What is takes is a very large number of bad tempered people and some media backing. I would be confident that Sony has tested this new system on a wide variety of player to get a feel for the market first.

    3. The number of players that refuse to play them will be small enough that the MPAA/Sony/Others will be able to railroad in this change over a year or so (after all some people will assume that their player is fucked and just get another cheap one) - but as the hackers of this world have a formidable reputation for cracking these things in a week or so the status will largely return to normal in due course.

    1. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by InterestingX · · Score: 3, Funny

      if it was 12cm wide and shiny people would put in their player anyhow

      That describes my 2 year old to the tee. You'd be surprised what we find in the VCR slot also.

    2. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      Wait, your 2 year old is 12cm wide and shiny?

      Damn, mine must have been defective!

    3. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I sure hope enough people cause a stink. Telling manufacturers to fix their firmware is stupid, about Sony-class stupid, I think, and Sony-class arrogant too, because DVD players weren't designed to play discs that were more defective than the standard required.

      There are so many brands and models of DVD players that I just don't see Sony testing more than a small share of them and actually making a good sample. I would laugh pretty hard if people found that some Sony DVD players didn't work with their new discs.

    4. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Insightful
      some people will assume that their player is fucked and just get another cheap one

      A lot of people here (UK) will assume the concept of a DVD is fucked, and not get another one. They will just go on the Internet instead, and stop viewing home movies entirely.

      In other countries I shall not name, they will assume that the fake ones are a better bet, and stop buying legit ones.

      Either way, it would appear that Sony has gone for gold in the Olympic foot shooting stakes.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I started buying DVD's only after DRM and region coding was cracked (go RPC-1)

    6. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Sony figures out there's no point at all to any of this since it doesn't actually stop pirates from copying the movies off the dvds in any way. It doesn't even slow them down. Not one single second.

      Yeah, that'll happen.

    7. Re:Not quite, I know all about this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, your 2 year old is 12cm wide and shiny?

      Damn, mine must have been defective!

      Warning: Trying to return the unit to the store for a refund may result in blunt force trauma.
  72. Sony- pure BALONEY! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    What everyone should do is buy all of these DVD's, open them, then bring them back for a refund. If the store wants to exchange them, that's fine...open those then bring THEM back as well! If Sony gets a few million opened DVD's from a bunch of pissed off retailers...well you get the picture (pun intended). You'd think tha Sony would have learned something from that rootkit fiasco they did last year...but I guess they're TOO stupid to learn ANYTHNG...so let's teach them (again!).

  73. Latest Bait & Switch - aka Next Attorneys Wind by Molecular+Mechanic · · Score: 1

    1)Sell a product (DVD player)
    2)Sell another product coupled to the utilization of the first product that requires "an upgrade of product 1."
    3)Prepare to settle class action lawsuits most of the United States, and probably several countries.

    If I were a stock market speculator, I would be looking hard at shorting Sony severely. They've not been doing so great the past few years, and they're looking to go from bad to worse.

    Molecular Mechanic

  74. No Wonder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is why I had so much trouble ripping Casino Royal when I rented it! You just have to use two programs instead of one though. Nice DRM, you can still rip the content if you want it, but people who buy the movie can not watch it, and most will not no how to strip out the DRM to make it playable. As ususal, nice job MPAA!!! If you look at these DVDs you will see the structure is different than a normal one. The video files are broken down into about 99 small encrypted ones (in the case of Casino Royal) instead of having one main .vob, and on the root of the disk it appears that there is a little .exe that allows them all to play.

  75. Sony - IMHO by Solokron · · Score: 1

    Sony has not been a top brand in my eyes since their initial DRM issues. I have avoided them since and find their products to lack the quality they had a decade ago. There are quite a few respectable quality product companies out there that it is not worth risking possible headaches on Sony products, even if they are on a pallet at Costco for a low price.

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  76. The best comment from the blog entry by ween14 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I love this quote right at the top of the entry about Sony:

    they have in fact made their latest releases unplayable on some DVD players, including my Sony DVP-CX995V DVD player. I don't think we even need another sign of the incompetence of Sony then the fact that they break their own hardware with their ill-conceived protection mechanisms. Obviously Sony divisions no longer talk to one another about what they are doing. This is a shame considering that communication between units was how Sony invented one of their most profitable items ever...the Walkman.

    left hand: make decent hardware...Profit!
    right hand: break hardware made by left hand...don't tell left hand about it....Profit?
    --
    Java has no friends.
  77. That's the problem by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It shouldn't be called a "new type of DVD" nor sold as such.

    Maybe I'm wrong, but like some "CDs" in the past that incorporated some copy protection and couldn't carry the CD logo/seal any longer on the cover, wouldn't the same thing apply here? Can Sony legimitately still call this thing a DVD anymore without being sued for fraud?

    1. Re:That's the problem by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe I'm wrong, but like some "CDs" in the past that incorporated some copy protection and couldn't carry the CD logo/seal any longer on the cover, wouldn't the same thing apply here? Can Sony legimitately still call this thing a DVD anymore without being sued for fraud?

      Perhaps the DVD-Video logo, but it's still a DVD. You can get software on DVDs. You can't play them in your video player, but they are still DVDs.

      Actually, it's the same thing with CDs. CDs with copy protection are still CDs; they just can't carry the CDDA (CD Digital Audio) logo.

    2. Re:That's the problem by Splab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't know about the general population, but I had no idea about that until people mentioned it here on slashdot. The CDs are in the CD part of the store, then I assume it is a CD. Same goes for DVDs.

    3. Re:That's the problem by Danse · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't know about the general population, but I had no idea about that until people mentioned it here on slashdot. The CDs are in the CD part of the store, then I assume it is a CD. Same goes for DVDs.

      And that's what they want you to think. And it's understandable if people don't know all the guidelines that go into those logos. However, the bottom line is that if you buy a DVD and it doesn't play in your player, you should return it and demand your money back. Let the stores deal with the manufacturers.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    4. Re:That's the problem by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "but like some "CDs" in the past that incorporated some copy protection and couldn't carry the CD logo/seal any longer on the cover"

      "Some?" A pseudorandom sample of CDs inspected at some local big-name stores that sell CDs have produced no CD audio logos that I could find. These newfangled "FBI warnings" seem to have taken their place.

    5. Re:That's the problem by debrain · · Score: 4, Informative


      Perhaps the DVD-Video logo, but it's still a DVD. You can get software on DVDs. You can't play them in your video player, but they are still DVDs.

      Actually, it's the same thing with CDs. CDs with copy protection are still CDs; they just can't carry the CDDA (CD Digital Audio) logo.

      Not according to the Red Book standard.

      There are a couple avenues of consumer remedy for buying one of these non-standard discs. First, warranties. When you purchase a CD or something purporting to be a CD, then its failure is a breach of general warranty for fitness. Second, if "CD" is a trademark, then selling a CD-like device as-if it were a CD can violate the trademark, and the trademark holder can pursue a remedy against the misrepresenter. Finally, there are statutory consumer protection acts which entitled consumers to remedies for violations of standards in product quality.

      You're right to say that, colloquially, a CD with copy protection is still a CD. It serves the same purpose, looks the same, and often functions in the exact same way as a "true" CD. However, a CD-like disc with copy protection is legally distinct from a CD as "Compact Disc" in terms of the warranty for fitness, trademark holder rights, and consumer protection laws.

      YMMV. :)

    6. Re:That's the problem by EvanED · · Score: 1
      Not according to the Red Book standard.

      That's not the appropriate source to site; in fact, it seems to at least somewhat confirm what I was saying:

      Philips and many other companies have warned them that including the Compact Disc Digital Audio logo on such non-conforming discs may constitute trademark infringement; either in anticipation or in response, the long-familiar logo is no longer to be seen on recent copy-protected CDs, as well as stickers and warnings that the CD is not standard and may not play in all CD players. [Emphasis mine]


      There are far more CD standards than just the red book; to argue what I'm saying you would have to argue that copy-protected CDs go against ALL of these standards, including ones like the Yellow Book CD-ROMs.

      I guess this could be the case if, e.g., the Yellow Book stipulates a format of data that these don't follow, but you certainly haven't done anything to show that.
    7. Re:That's the problem by rainman_bc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Second, if "CD" is a trademark, then selling a CD-like device as-if it were a CD can violate the trademark, and the trademark holder can pursue a remedy against the misrepresenter

      What's troublesome here is that Sony and Phillips that established the red book standard. Now if Sony holds that trademark, along with Phillips, it might be a bit tricky for Sony to sue themselves.

      That's why the market should be deathly afraid of a Blue-Ray DVD victory. It'll mean that Sony will control the standard and move it around as it suits Sony. Amongst other reasons that is. It might certainly be [slightly] more superior than HD-DVD, although who's eyes can tell?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:That's the problem by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      CDs with copy protection are still CDs; they just can't carry the CDDA (CD Digital Audio) logo.

      When they no longer adhere to any of the CD standards (redbook, yellowbook, kodak), they are no longer CDs. Some forms of copy protection fall under this category. Others make up their own spec (GDRom).

      BBH

    9. Re:That's the problem by bazorg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Can Sony legimitately still call this thing a DVD anymore without being sued for fraud?

      IMHO this should be dealt with the other way around. Instead of preventing companies from labeling these discs as DVD/CD/whatever, they should be forced to tag the boxes with "CONTAINS DRM", "Content is remotely managed by $CompanyName", "Contains rootkit by Sony", etc. This is a matter of consumer rights, not just distributors' rights. The consumer should be made aware of how the device is meant to work and hopefully a standard set of consumer warnings and advisories should foster the much needed discussion on the fairness of these distributors' tools.

    10. Re:That's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CDs are in the CD part of the store, then I assume it is a CD. Same goes for DVDs.

      Now isn't that a double-edged sword for Sony? The only reason they can get away with their draconian copy-protection schemes is because people don't know any better. But, when they f it up, people still don't know any better, whose fault is it?

      From the Amamzon thread posted above:
      I have the same problem with "The Holiday" and "Casino Royale" as well. Three movies I have paid for that will not play on my DVD player. All Sony. Pathetic.

      I am very glad we did not buy this DVD, and it will go on the list of ones NOT TO BUY. I think I will NOT be buying new Sony dvds at all.

      Yet another example of what the computer industry learned about copy protection many years ago: No form of copy protection deters enough pirates to make it worth the loss of legitimate customers that it pisses off.

    11. Re:That's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why the market should be deathly afraid of a Blue-Ray DVD victory. It'll mean that Sony will control the standard and move it around as it suits Sony. Amongst other reasons that is. It might certainly be [slightly] more superior than HD-DVD, although who's eyes can tell?

            Actually, the point that Blu Ray is superior to HD-DVD is actually a misconception and factually wrong. Blu-Ray was considered that way because of the fact that it discs capacity is larger and the technology of using a blue high intensity laser is new technology. However that being said, The Blu-Ray standard uses MPEG2 encoding which is old technology (which explains the reason for new technology). This means that Blu-Ray needed to be brought to the market because it required a disc large enough to capture the same quality of video that HD-DVD offers which the new video compression H.264 that it uses (the newest format on the market widely used by Apple, Nero, and Divx). HD-DVD uses less space since it is better compression method to achieve the same picture, and since Toshiba just announced HD-DVD capicity that is now 51 gigs (Making it 1 gig bigger than Blu-Ray) and being backwards compatiable to original DVD's, I think everybody isn't getting the full picture but a smokescreen.

      Blu-Ray new DVD manufacturing process but old compression requiring a large disk
      HD-DVD old manufacturing process with newest compression requiring less space + backwards compatible and now larger disk

    12. Re:That's the problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If that's really the case, then if I were in charge of what gets distributed on HDDVD then I would just put out a whole bunch of collections on HDDVD to show them who really has more space on their disc. It's not about real space, it's about who can fit more actual content. 51 Gigs should be enough to fit an entire season of a TV show. Even in HD format. As long as you're using h.264, you should be able to pull this off. Show people that your format really is better, and people will start buying it. Plus. HDDVDs should be cheaper to make, so start selling them for less.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:That's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Interesting" but completely WRONG.

      Both BD and HD-DVD can use AVC, MPEG2 or VC-1. The only practical difference is that BD has larger capacity discs and can therefore offer longer playing times and/or higher average bitrates.

    14. Re:That's the problem by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      The logo is for "compact disc digital audio". See Red Book (audio CD standard) for details about this issue.

    15. Re:That's the problem by mrball_cb · · Score: 1

      That's why the market should be deathly afraid of a Blue-Ray DVD victory. No chance of that happening. If it's true that Sony is dead set against Blue-Ray pressing plants actually producing Porn DVD's, then HD-DVD will win hand over fist.
    16. Re:That's the problem by questionlp · · Score: 1

      Blu-Ray is not limited to MPEG-2, but can also handle AVC MPEG-4 as seen on the Discovery Atlas Blu-Ray versions.

      I do agree that Blu-Ray has an inherent cost disadvantage to HD-DVD, due to manufacturing differences between the two formats and Blu-Ray players costing more (on average) than HD-DVD players.

    17. Re:That's the problem by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      BigBuckHunter and included with a post:

      CDs with copy protection are still CDs; they just can't carry the CDDA (CD Digital Audio) logo.

      When they no longer adhere to any of the CD standards (redbook, yellowbook, kodak), they are no longer CDs. Some forms of copy protection fall under this category. Others make up their own spec (GDRom).

      This is why I've taken to calling a disc that does not conform to the CD standard a Digital Audio Disc (DAD). It is accurate say the disc contains audio information, but it cannot be said to be a CD.

      My view is that if a company wants to release a DAD they can do so but it needs to be clearly labeled that it is not a CD. This should be the function of the CD logo, but I've noticed that many CDs don't have the logo so looking for it often doesn't help.

      An Observation: I think the reason that CD will still be around for a while is that the new formats (both physical and on-line) that are introduced to replace it will be rejected by the public because of DRM. Although some buyers will accept the new DRMed formats, it will not be enough to make up for the loss of sales due to the rejection of DRM.

    18. Re:That's the problem by MacGabhain · · Score: 1

      The issue with "CD" is that it is trademarked by Philips and can only be used with their permission. They've refused to give that permission to anything that doesn't strictly meet the format standard. Not sure what issues would arise with "DVD" or "DVD-Video".

      I make a point to try to find Philips products when I need something for just that reason.

    19. Re:That's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe I'm wrong, but like some "CDs" in the past that incorporated some copy protection and couldn't carry the CD logo/seal any longer on the cover, wouldn't the same thing apply here?"

      Sure - that's why Disney doesn't offer movies on DVD, but on "Disney DVD".

    20. Re:That's the problem by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      YES! That's by far the greatest idea I've ever heard regarding the whole issue.

      I don't trust, even in the SLIGHTEST, when Sony or *insert corporation* says something is safe to use. It's a rather safe assumption that if they're not outright lying, they're at least bending the truth to only work under very specific circumstances.

      Now... if they were forced to put a WARNING on the box instead of "HAY TRUST US, THIS IS GOOD!!!!" type symbols, I'd tend to trust that a lot more.

      Then again, they'd just lie about how bad, or how bad the DRM is in the warning... but at least you'd have a vague idea. Just take any warning on a box, and multiply it by anywhere between 10 to 50 to get an accurate reading :P

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    21. Re:That's the problem by afedaken · · Score: 1

      Putting aside the manufacturing techniques, aren't both standards now using the same VC9 compression?

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
  78. The movies listed are on usenet by r6_jason · · Score: 1

    The movies listed in the article are on Usenet, I didn't search torrent, but logic says they would be there as well, so I am not too sure who this stops really, just turns more people to pirated content to watch a movie they were willing to pay top dollar for.

  79. Copy protection by Edward+Kmett · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as a perfect copy protection scheme. Someone really really needs to explain the statistical concepts of type I and type II errors to Sony management.

    The worst part about draconian copy protection measures is that they actually force legitimate users to use the hacks. I bought Doom 3, swapped my copy out at the store because the game would install but not play at the suggestion of the Activision rep on the phone, and finally gave up and cracked my legitimate copy of the game because I couldn't get it to play off the disk thanks to "Starforce 3." Now I simply refuse to buy any game with physical copy protection.

    I stopped listening to music because of the asinine tactics of the RIAA, Sony's rootkit maneuvers, and the various CD copy-protection schemes out there. I may start listening again thanks to DRM-free EMI music being available, but in the meantime the worst part is they'll just point to my 'lost revenue' as evidence that they need to ratchet up their spending on these measures. One can readily draw parallels between the escalating costs and mis-characterization of innocent people via the DRM/copy-protection war-on-hackers and the war-on-terror, but the hyperbole admittedly seems a bit overblown in that light.

    In any event, I won't be buying Sony DVDs for a while.

    Fortunately, until the net-neutrality debate is lost, I at least have the internet to keep me entertained.

    --
    Sanity is a sandbox. I prefer the swings.
  80. Funny story... by wilgibson · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hadn't heard about this until the story was put up on here. I had borrowed Stranger Than Fiction a few weeks back from a friend, and watched it on my old PS2(2nd gen, not slimline). My sister wanted to watch it so he said I could give it to her. I was talking about this tonight at dinner and she mentioned it wouldn't play on here Sony Vaio at all. She had to try two other players in her house before finding one it would work on. neither of which were Sony.

  81. I've had this problem by malkir · · Score: 1

    Complete bullshit - I went and bought Casino Royal, popped it in my computer, didn't run. A stupid flash thing popped up, 'Click to play movie!' and clicking did nothing. Fuck you, Sony.

    1. Re:I've had this problem by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Complete bullshit - I went and bought Casino Royal, popped it in my computer, didn't run. A stupid flash thing popped up, 'Click to play movie!' and clicking did nothing. Fuck you, Sony.
      Hold down the shift key when you insert the DVD. You should be able to play it with your DVD player software then.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  82. Nice way to blow it by Triv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I grabbed a torrent of Casino Royale a few days ago because it came up in conversation with some friends, and really liked it, liked it enough for me to buy it the next time I was near a video store - I wanted the better picture quality, and the extra features, and to free up the space on my drive. Now that I know it's copyright protected to the point of being unplayable? Sorry Sony; you just lost my twenty bucks. Sucks to be you.

    Triv

  83. I have an ancient DVD player & it works by gelfling · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have an ancient player, probably 6 years old and Casino Royale and Stranger than Fiction (from Blockbuster) work 100%.

    1. Re:I have an ancient DVD player & it works by nexex · · Score: 1

      Same here, on a Sony player.

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  84. My Hard Earned Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lets see. Sony loads worms and trojans into PAYING customers machines...who PURCHASED music media. LEGALLY.
    Sony makes media / movies PAYING CUSTOMERS purchase, that WON"T work as per the STANDARD. Hmmm. THey bork.
    Sony says, sorry, tough - upgrade. Meh.

    I say this. Sony, you'll never see my money again. Sorry. Your are tools. When PIRACY is EAISER then purchased media, when pirated content plays EASIER and better then yours...you have a serious issue with seeing the 'big picture'. You have to compete now with that. YUP its true....suck it up and be a bigger man and come back to the market with your BRAINS because your muscle is weaker then ever now...

      Consumers are good. You want them. You want them to BUY your shit. TO enjoy it. TO be ABLE to use it. Those last two points, they are key. USE and ENJOY. Get it? Well it seems not.

      You are so out of touch of reality it will be your down fall. It is your down fall. You ARE falling. These actions are just that, PROOF how stunned you really are.

    Labels wonder why sales are low? Jesus could it be the customer is WRONG, dead last and A THEIF! Lets beat the guys over the head with a lead pipe who DARE, DARE to show up at a check out and purchase our products. How the fuck is this any different? I want to buy it and then GET punished for it? Sorry..i won't buy into that.

    Sorry sony. I have not purchased your shit media, or electronics since the ps2 many years ago. NO longer. I vote with my dollar. Get the message? More importantly, do you UNDERSTAND the message?

    Nope. Guess not. Not yet :)

  85. What did you expect from Sony? by Whuffo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    After the great rootkit incident it should have been obvious to any observer that Sony didn't give a damn about what their customers thought. Folks with a good memory should also remember the "We'll firewall it at your PC" statement from Sony.

    Sure, they got their fingers burned a little over the rootkit debacle - but they aren't sorry about it, nor have they changed their direction. Expect more outrages from this corporation that has already "jumped the shark".

    What can us as consumers do? It's simple; just say NO to anything from Sony. If you'd been doing that since the rootkit, you wouldn't be bothered with these defective DVDs or their future mistakes. All they look at is their bottom line, and the only thing they'll pay attention to is when that bottom line suffers; quit buying their crap and they'll pay attention.

    1. Re:What did you expect from Sony? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, are people still buying media from RIAA/MAFIAA companies? I stopped buying their crap when they started acting like it was the eighties and VCRs were about to destroy their business. I still buy music, but only when it comes DRM-free and RIAA-free (thanks, RIAA Radar!).

      It makes me sad that anyone who'd read slashdot are (a) surprised and (b) are still buying crap from Sony. Stop supporting dead business models, and they'll go away.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    2. Re:What did you expect from Sony? by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      > say NO to anything from Sony

      Erm, it's bad for my KarmaChameleon, but I want to verify for the record if are you saying that, in the Console business, MicroSoft are suddenly the *good* guys?

    3. Re:What did you expect from Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Nintendo are.

      Try to keep up...

    4. Re:What did you expect from Sony? by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't look at me. Godfather seemed a solid release, but it's too much Mario/Zelda crap for me, or PS2 2 Wii ports of outdated graphics for the Wii. I like the idea, but it you're into Ghost Recon and CoD3 kinda stuff, Wii is not there yet.

      this is hugely off-topic, of course. It is, however, another proof that no matter how blatantly sarcastic one is, there's always some anonymous idiot on /. that has to take one too seriously.

  86. the arrogance of sony.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    "Sony says it's up to the manufacturers to update their hardware."

    yeeah, the other companies will make new hardware for your defective product.

    how about this one.. "the manufacturers won't update their hardware, and you will eat the brunt of the consumer backlash"

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  87. Same thing happened with Sony Music CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap bastards. We got a replacement from BMG after the Sony label music CDs wouldn't play in our PC drives. The second CDs didn't work right, either.

  88. Get directors involved by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Any chance of getting Hollywood directors involved or others financing the movies? If they agree to publish with Sony, do they know about this copy-protection schema? Anything that would cause a loss of sales (a return on their investment) would surely not sit over well.

  89. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rented and copied Stranger Than Fiction with my BlockBuster online subscription the weekend it came out. I didn't even know it had any special form of copy protection on it. Good job, Sony.

  90. Re:ARCCOS, use dd_rescue by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to use dd_rescue instead. This version of dd basically ignores the errors and was initially intended to be used to recover data from failing or failed disks. You can tell dd_rescue to null load the "bad" data areas.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  91. Yet, DVD Decrypter still works on these titles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, in my friend's experience.

    Keep up the good work, Sony!

  92. Why Sony why? by th3rmite · · Score: 1

    Message to Sony, I live in Afghanistan and I can go down to the local market and buy a copy of Casino Royale for $3 US. It is almost indistinguishable from a retail DVD, nice case and everything. All you are doing is screwing the legitimate customers who want to buy your movies. I for one was looking forward to buying a legit copy of Casio Royale but I guess I won't be doing so because how can I guarantee it will work in all 7 of my DVD players (I have one in every room)?

  93. Oh my... by beatle11 · · Score: 1

    "Sony says its up to the manufacturers to update their hardware". That is absolute BS. Sony has really been going downhill and this is not helping.

  94. I own all three DVDs... by ChePibe · · Score: 2, Funny

    And no problems on my part.

    They work fine in an older XBox, newer (last 18 months) Toshiba DVD Recorder, on my wife's older iBook, and on my newer (last gen) iBook as well.

    I do get a kick out of Sony making their products incompatible with the rest of their product line, though. Especially given the premium they often charge for proprietary components that supposedly have better integration.

  95. But Sony DVDs are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a spindle of them right here.

  96. Pisses me off pretty bad by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    My parents rented Casino Royal, and I spent about 2 hours trying to get it to work on my laptop. My options became use a dvd player (which I have at home, but not school) or to download the movie. Needless to say, I don't rent when I'm not at home.

  97. Sony electronics actually rather quite sucks by arrianus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony Electronics has gone down the tubes in the past decade or so (it started a while before that -- old school Sony TVs and CRTs had a full metal Faraday cage around the tube, and touches like that went sometime before then). Nowadays, Sony electronics is mostly living off of the reputation it developed up through the 80s or 90s, when it delivered truly exceptional quality products at a high premium. Sony still charges a premium (albeit a smaller one), while delivering mostly sub-par products.

    The Sony laptops are light and attractive, but almost universally have mechanical problems (hinges and latches break). The MP3 players are a disaster. A relative bought one, and it wouldn't play MP3s -- he had to convert music into Sony's proprietary atrak format before it worked. He returned it and bought an iRiver. The headphones give reasonable (but not exceptional) audio quality for the price, but generally break after about 3 months of use. Cameras have nice imagers, mechanically filmy (but not horrible), but as with most Sony, try to force you into a proprietary, incompatible, overpriced technology stack with MemoryStick. PS3 was an unqualified disaster. Home audio equipment is okay, but suboptimal on the price/performance curve (e.g. Kenwood generally has better-sounding, better-quality equipment for the same price in my price range).

    I also really, really, really hate the attempted "synergy." If you want the PS3, you need to pay for Blu-ray. Everything you buy will use MemoryStick, and where possible, use proprietary cables, plugs, and formats to try to lock you in to buy other Sony products, and not work well with non-Sony products.

    1. Re:Sony electronics actually rather quite sucks by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I also really, really, really hate the attempted "synergy." If you want the PS3, you need to pay for Blu-ray. Everything you buy will use MemoryStick, and where possible, use proprietary cables, plugs, and formats to try to lock you in to buy other Sony products, and not work well with non-Sony products.

      I agree with you except for the PS3. The PS3 is a quality piece of kit and is by far the most open of any console. It uses industry or open standards such as HDMI, CF, MS, SD, USB, bluetooth, 801.11g, MP3, AAC, H264, AVC etc. I had absolutely no trouble using it with my Freecom bluetooth keyboard or a Motorola headset or an external USB drive. Hell, you can even swap out the hard disk too through a convenient hatch and replace it for any other 2.5" SATA drive. If you want to see proprietary, take a look at the 360 where the cost of a hard disk or memory card is more than double what it should be thanks to proprietary casings.

      As for Blu-Ray, yes I expect it does add $100 to the price at least and in some ways it is a trojan horse. But it is useful for games and games can and do use the extra capacity. And lots of people do want to watch HD content so its useful in that capacity too. Blu-Ray sales are rocketing so it's hard to deny that the PS3 isn't mostly responsible for that.

      I think the PS3 actually represents the the sort of synergy that Sony should be looking for. While the console is very standards based and you are not compelled to use any other Sony gear, it obviously drives sales of Bravia TVs (esp. 1080p models) and Blu-Ray discs, and conversely sales of Bravia TVs drive sales of PS3s. And given that Blu-Ray appears to be winning against HD-DVD I'd say the PS3 has been very successful way of seeding the market. Seems like Sony are doing something right.

      I think other Sony gear runs the spectrum from crap to good. I really have loyalty or interest in their stuff aside from Playstation. I think the best approach for most consumer electronics gear is to pick the best of breed whichever company produces it.

    2. Re:Sony electronics actually rather quite sucks by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1

      Home audio equipment is okay, but suboptimal on the price/performance curve (e.g. Kenwood generally has better-sounding, better-quality equipment for the same price in my price range).

      Don't I know it. A year ago when I went to buy a new stereo head unit for my car, I threw Sony out first thing on the grounds that after they screwed up my wife's computer with Suncomm DRM and cost me two hours fix time, I wasn't going to give them my money without a fight. I bought a Kenwood unit that plays MP3, WMA and non-DRM AAC (basically in this case, iTunes songs ripped from CD). At the time, only two units Crutchfield listed for my car did AAC and both were Kenwoods, so since the wife has everything iTuned up, and I use MP3 exclusively, it made a good fit.

      A couple weeks later I wondered if I had spent more than I should -- after all, when I first started looking at this product segment 5 years before, Sony was one of the very few that even did car-stereo MP3 and everyone I knew that had one bought a Sony. So I went back and compared the Kenwood units to the Sony units. No contest -- the Kenwoods got better user reviews, listed better specs and had more features (even discounting AAC) at each price point right down the line.

      The last Sony electronics I bought was the Walkman I picked up at Wal-Mart back in 1998. I was disappointed with some of the build quality, but it served (and still does). Nowadays I buy anything but Sony, and couldn't be happier.

      --
      -- Old Man Kensey
  98. Pirate scum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who pirate movies and music through file sharing networks (and copy programs), are the scum of the earth. If you can't stand the price of the movies, or the inconvenience caused by DRM, etc, then bloody STOP SUPPORTING THE FREAKING INDUSTRY BY DOWNLOADING the FEAK'N STUFF! You aren't helping anyone but your freak'n self. I absolutely hate people like you. I'm a boycott'er and you piss me right the xell off! You're like a junkie or a child that keeps yelling gimmie gimmie gimme!

    Idiots.

  99. "Fully compatible with available DVD players" by pruss · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amusingly, Sony claims the ARccOS copyprotection system is "Fully compatible with available DVD players and drives" (http://www.sonydadc.com/products.copy.arccos.go).

    1. Re:"Fully compatible with available DVD players" by rb240sx · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARccOS_Protection appearantly, even a sony dvd player can't play their own format (Sony DVPCX995) "ARccOS had reportedly been discontinued by Sony in February of 2006." -- I think not :-(

  100. Ripping Casino Royale right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I can't play this Netflix disc on my player, I'm making a copy that I can play. I'm using libdvdcss and dvdbackup to get the files and growisofs to burn a DVD+R-DL. I guess I'll have a disc of my own when I'm done. If I hadn't had to do this, I might have bought the movie (provided that I like it). I have lots of Bond flicks and even have the original Casino Royale. It's too bad that Sony has turned me into a criminal.

  101. What's so bad about that? by Manchot · · Score: 4, Funny

    It shouldn't be that hard to undo ARCCOS: just run it through COS!

    1. Re:What's so bad about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I had mod points... quite funny!

  102. Well, Linux can rip it if you know what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm ripping Casino Royale as I post this. It takes a little longer but it *CAN* be done. You just edit dvdbackup so it ignores read errors from the media. (Did I just violate the DMCA?)

  103. Even more powerful by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Lots of returns to Sony will hurt Sony's profits and piss off the shareholders.

    Pissed off share holders, particularly those who might have personally encountered the DVD problem, are a very nasty bunch to deal with. They cause heads to roll when voting for new board members etc.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Even more powerful by dcarmi · · Score: 1

      I don't buy UBISoft games, anymore. I bought one and it did not work. Contacted UBISoft and eventually was told that I needed to buy a DVD-ROM rather than a DVD-Writer. DRM you see. Therefore, I nor my kids buy UBISoft games because chances are they won't work and we don't want the hassle of returning it. I nearly bought a Sony MP3 player (the wife particularly liked the design) but with Sony's reputation I felt it unwise and went with another manufacturer. My mobile phone will need replacing later this year. It is a Sony Ericsson and served me very well. Great phone! However, I am not sure that I trust Sony at the moment, so perhaps I looks at other brands. Our digital camera is a bit old and frankly ropey now. My wife wants a shiny new one. I won't bother looking at Sony cameras for reasons stated above. Probably next year our TV will need replacing I have 13 years old Samsung and if the next one lasts that long I will be over the moon. HD seems a sensible move via our cable supplier. I won't consider a jump for Blue-Ray or HD-DVD because there is no concensus and chances are that the "standards" may be tweaked. Shucks they are still tweaking DVD's. I'll let others get "Beta-Maxxed". The point of this monologue, is that I am someone with a bit of technical knowledge, likes change and new toys but is sick to the back teeth with the frustration and hassle of shoddy customer relations and things that frankly don't work or will be deliberately broken in the near future. I just want things to work! I want to buy my CD or DVD and play it where I want it played at my convenience! I am the customer and I am right (or they don't get my money)!! I won't buy Sony any more unless I can't avoid. UBISoft can go hang. If I get a CD or DVD that won't play, I can't be bothered going through the "returns process", so I won't buy any more from that company. Being someone with a modicum of technical ability, I get asked for advice on such issues. If I tell people to avoid companies like UBISoft and Sony and don't touch Blue-Ray or HD-DVD for the foreseeable future, how many people like me does it take to dent profits? If companies such as Sony care little about me, why should I bother about them?

  104. Consumer Math by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's say that the average consumer is looking at investing in a movie, but knows there is a 1 out of 10 chance that they're wasting their money. There is now a looming doubt if the thing will play at all. It may be a small doubt, but any transaction cost is real. Let's then say that 1 out of 10 decide not to buy, and instead... well, it really doesn't matter what instead, as Sony has already lost their money.

    Let's also say that the average pirate is looking to change their ways, and is now out of college and making enough money to support paying for movies. Their incentive to do so is threat of legal persecution and, more significantly, a moral imperitive to support artists that they care about. Now, suddenly, on the other side of the equation is this looming doubt over whether the thing will work at all. If the scales had tipped one way earlier, this might just be enough to tip them the other way.

    So in other words, Sony has succeeded in alienating a section of their customer base, prevented another section from becoming legal customers, and all the while (judging by the wide availability of pirated copies of the movies mentioned) had zero effect on the piracy of their movies.

    Brilliant. Is it time to put Sony to bed with SCO yet?

    1. Re:Consumer Math by WeeBit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Brilliant. Is it time to put Sony to bed with SCO yet? Hell NO, we don't need those two making babies!
    2. Re:Consumer Math by Perseid · · Score: 4, Funny

      The SCOny version of UNIX would come with the rootkits preinstalled.

    3. Re:Consumer Math by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Hell NO, we don't need those two making babies!

      I should say not

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Consumer Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No baby would result. They'd be too busy fucking themselves.

    5. Re:Consumer Math by myxiplx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even better, the average consumer buys one of these but it won't play on their DVD player. They don't pirate movies, and know nothing about the technology, but when they go back to Amazon they read about all these other people having problems, and find out that some people have been able to watch the movie by downloading a 'torrent'.

      So, they fix the problem themselves by downloading it. Now, what do you think that customer is going to do the next time they want a movie?

      WTG Sony, you've just educated another customer in the benefits of piracy...

    6. Re:Consumer Math by abb3w · · Score: 1

      Let's then say that 1 out of 10 decide not to buy, and instead... well, it really doesn't matter what instead, as Sony has already lost their money.

      My wallet votes for a nice old-fashioned dead tree edition book.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  105. Re:DMCA takedown notice (the OSX Edition) by faedle · · Score: 1

    MacTheRipper was able to rip the DVD, although it took it a while and there was more than one complaint about bad sectors.

    Good work there, Lou. You've managed to make a DVD that the only way I can watch it is to make a copy.

  106. Assume good faith, put it in writing. by anonymous_echidna · · Score: 1

    The product is clearly defective if a Sony DVD will not play in a new Sony DVD player, and it is hard to imagine that this is not Sony's fault. However, let's assume good faith on the part of the customer, retailer and manufacturer, since there is no obvious reason to claim that anyone has been dishonest. The aim is to make it Sony's problem, not the problem of the customer or retailer.

    Intially, the problem is with the customer, who is not at fault.
    The implied "fit for purpose" contract that the customer has is with the retailer, from whom the purchase was made. The retailer, by selling someone else's product, takes on the risk of the product being defective.

    The correct customer response is to return the product to the retailer, who is not at fault, but has the responsibility to the customer for the defective product .
    Now the problem is with the retailer, who is also not at fault.
    The ultimate responsibility belongs to the manufacturer, and that is where the problem should reside. The remaining step is for the retailer to take issue with the manufacturer. The tricky bit for the retailer is that the DVD is not faulty in every situation, which makes it difficult to return, since the retailer may not be able to verify the fault. The customer, not being lazy and wishing to maintain a relationship with the retailer, could do the right thing to help the retailer in this regard by providing a written letter of complaint detailing the problem, which makes it much easier for the retailer to go back to the manufacturer. It has the added benefit of making the intial return process reasonably civil.

    --
    In most times, most places, by most people, liars are considered contemptible. - Ursula Le Guin
    1. Re:Assume good faith, put it in writing. by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      You assume that YOUR BELIEF of its defective nature is deterministic--it isn't. Contrary to the claims of the "defective by design" campaign, customers have no legal power to label something as defective, merely because it isn't what they wanted. The disc functions exactly as intended. There is no legal redress available to the retailer, because they have merely accepted the discs as a part of good customer service (they are *not* required to take these discs back simply because they have a retarded copy protection scheme that makes them incompatible with some players--that is not a defect, which is a legal condition which can only be identified by a court, regulatory body, or the manufacturer).

      It is manipulation of good faith customer service, plain and simple. "Fit for purpose" does not cover "I assumed it would work, since it looks like other products that do work." Sony did indeed misrepresent itself to both retailers and customers, since it made no notice that the product was different and might not work.

      But there is no retailer liability for that. None. Retailers could refuse to accept the return if they have a compatible player to test them on (to verify that they do play on compatible devices), but it would result in horrible backlash.

    2. Re:Assume good faith, put it in writing. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      If "fit for purpose" does not cover "I assumed it would work because it looks like, and is labeled like, other products that do work"--then what, exactly, does it cover?

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    3. Re:Assume good faith, put it in writing. by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Labeling is a separate issue and not part of my statement. Since the DVD label technically doesn't mean anything, you have an advertising issue. I agree that Sony should have a giant disclaimer about compatibility on their discs, but again, the discs function as Sony intended them to and happeny to work on most players. The assumption that anything carrying the DVD logo means that it works in a DVD player is a faulty one. Software titles carry the DVD logo and do not work in a DVD player, and even use of the DVD video logo does not preclude a Draconian DRM scheme being used in addition to it (unlike the CD Audio case).

      If you buy a particular saw blade with a counter-serrated edge for masonry work and use it to cut lumber, you'll be quite upset with the results. That saw blade LOOKS like other saw blades generally, but it does not perform the same as a multi-purpose blade. The labels often do not provide much information beyond the type of saw that it fits. If you buy the wrong blade, even though it fits in your saw and is labeled as a saw blade, it is still "fit for purpose" even though it didn't work to your expectation.

      The "fit for purpose" argument has been used unsuccessfully against DRMed audio content as well. The digital audio download may at face value not indicate what devices it is and is not compatible with, instead relying on user knowledge to determine compatibility. Assuming that because a digital file works on your computer that it will work on your portable player of choice is not a compelling legal foundation for a warranty of fitness claim. It is a liability issue for other reasons (for the manufacturer), but warranty of fitness is for merchants/retailers.

      Sony is not doing its part to ensure that consumers can make the correct determination, but that is not a "fit for purpose" argument. To say it is reflects only confusion about consumer law. The problem is one of labeling and informing of the customer, with an onus on the manufacturer alone. "Fit for purpose" protections assume a compatibility standard of care. They are particularly tricky with software content--it can be fit for purpose without being universally compatible. The problem you describe is one of disclosure (primarily that Sony does not disclose that its discs may not be playable on certain hardware but also that the DVD player hardware does not disclose its own limitation). The DVD logo unfortunately does not mean anything like the CD logo does, so the logo does not in fact make any sort of enforceable claim.

      In short, customer assumption about compatibility does not correlate to warranty of fitness status on the product. If you create a product called "iCassette" which is nothing more than a tape deck adapter, people will assume that it will work with an iPod. If for some reason it was incompatible with an iPod, it does not violate a warranty of fitness if it never claimed iPod compatibility. You do have a misrepresentation issue there, however, and probably a trademark conflict, but not all customer confusion is lumped under implied warranties.

  107. 1 out of 300 by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    Reviewers did say this one was bigger on crotch sizes than it was historical accuracy. But after wetting myself laughing at Brad Pitt posing and somersaulting on the beaches of Troy, I decided not to take this genre seriously. Seeing this tomorrow, so think I'll pretend it's Faramir fighting Orcs in the deserts south of Mordor. :-)

  108. drm new by ralph1 · · Score: 0

    they still copied just fine.

  109. Sony's PR department is better than yours by bberens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony will say that because of big bad rippers they had to update the security. The ones who will look bad in the media are the rippers. Sony knows damn good and well that this will barely cause a hiccup in illegal copying of DVDs. What it does is give them an opportunity to demonize the copiers. Remember, the media giants who own the news outlets? Well, they care about their digial rights and copyright as well. They WILL NOT come out in favor of the consumer on this. You'll see.

    --
    Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    1. Re:Sony's PR department is better than yours by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I dunno how many people will sony PR reach but the average joe that sees that sony dvds do not work on their recent equipment while other brands work flawlessly is likely to blame sony.

      As for me i still have a boycott in place because of the cd rootkit, this doesn't help a bit making me reconsider.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  110. Re:Latest Bait & Switch - aka Next Attorneys W by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    If I were a stock market speculator, I would be looking hard at shorting Sony severely

          As if the stock market and share prices had anything to do with reality... go ahead and short all the stock you want on this "news".

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  111. Hilarious to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that the most recent DVDs released by Sony -- specifically . . . Casino Royale . . . have some kind of 'feature' that makes them unplayable on many DVD players.

    . . .

    A blogger called Sony and was told the problem is with the new copy protection scheme, and they do not intend to fix it.
    ...because I downloaded a ripped DVD of Casino Royale off of usenet a month ago.

  112. Are political nihilists also bad programmers? by Dster76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wish I had mod points for you, buddy.

    Anyone remember this article about bugs and programming?

    Committing the "black or white fallacy" is destructive everywhere, both in politics and programming. Saying that there's no difference between Democrats and Republicans because they're both politicians is good for one thing:

    letting smug, lazy cynics feel somehow that by not doing anything, they're intellectually superior.

    All that makes you is a part of the problem.

    1. Re:Are political nihilists also bad programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wish I had mod points for you, buddy.

      Presumably so you could mod his post as off-topic? That would be the only reasonable choice. The purpose of the moderation system is to promote and improve the discussion of the topic at hand. His political views, irrespective of your opinions of their quality or insightfulness, do not address the topic.

  113. How to tell an ARCCOS DVD... by TurtleBlue · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's quite simple actually - if you can get it to play, during the movie switch to the title/track info of the DVD.

    If it says "Title 1 of 99" - congratulations! (ignore the "Track" info)

    Note the most humorous thing about this copyright structure is it's glaring simplicity to avoid, much like the "marker over the encrypted" sector trick - they came out with this idea, and immediately ripper programmers thought "oh well, we'll just skip any unreferenced track." doom9 is littered with with forum info and workarounds that were found immediately.

    I don't blame Sony for trying (it is their job to try to protect their material - despite the flames I may get for saying that), but any exec that creates a copyright strategy that can be so easily circumnavigated while alienating customers should be immediately fired.

  114. Problem Solved! by ElvisGump · · Score: 1

    Netflix + RipIt4Me (or DVDFabPlatinum) and problem solved.

    I stupidly bought several Sony Trinitrons, Betamaxs, VCRs, and stereos over the last 25 years, but no more. Never again will I buy Sony.

    That'll learn 'em.

  115. I wonder... by jtgd · · Score: 1

    Sony says it's up to the manufacturers to update their hardware.
    Any odds I could find a Sony DVD player that this won't work in?
    --
    J
  116. What a shame.. by Reed+Solomon · · Score: 1

    And I was seriously considering buying a Sony Ericson phone. I thought Sony wised up. Ah well, Nokia it is. THANKS Sony.

  117. Don't know about the people you know... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    ... but a lot of the people I know would be stuck at number five.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  118. I ran into this with Casino Royale by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    I ran into the newfangled copy protection on Casino Royale while trying to rip it to my DVD server. Luckily the folks at Ars Technica were able to point me in the right direction. A quick download and install of Ripit4Me and I was able to rip the DVD. Pain in the butt, though, since I bought the freaking disc.

    1. Re:I ran into this with Casino Royale by Steveftoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love how it's necessary now to use tools that only pirates are supposed to use in order to get these dvd to play on a DVD player.

      I know that Sony just wants to make sure that people can't pirate their movies, but it's too late for that. It's game over for DVD, at this point the toolchain for ripping dvds is so advanced that it's almost an open format. You might as well avoid all the pain and suffering of trying to encrypt the dvd and just release all DVDs as open format without encryption.

      A simple download of a tool and the right DVD drive is all it takes to make a protected DVD into an open one.

      I think that it was a smart move on the content producers part that they also used MPEG-2 for HD, when they could have used MPEG-4. MPEG-4 would to have increased the amount of content they could put on a BluRay/HD-DVD since the same movie would take less room on the disc. I think that they wanted the massive amount of data required for MPEG-2 HD content. It only makes it harder for the pirates to rip/burn/transmit a large movie if the source material is huge as well. It makes the pirate re-encode the movie since less people will download a 20+ GB movie. Re-encoding causes the resulting movie to look slightly worse then the original since it is very hard to re-encode a movie in a lossless fashion. It can be done, but usually takes multiple encodes as finding the right bitrate to keep the loss imperceptible is not something the tool does for you (AFIAK).

  119. Breaches with Norwegian law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't allowed to put anything on a CD/DVD that prevents free use like that.

    1. Re:Breaches with Norwegian law by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Yes you are, you just have to disclose it on the cover so customers can see the defect before they buy.

      People have some strange utopian impressions of Norwegian law :-)

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  120. No Problem by PPH · · Score: 1
    I will return my Sony DVD to the retailer and get my money back.


    Sony will have to deal with the pissed off retailers.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  121. Noone suggested it yet? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised noone has suggested yet, that sony are breaking compatibility at least in part to put bad publicity on the DVD format...
    "Look, blu-ray doesnt have these problems!"

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  122. Giant Douche & Turd Sandwich by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    you simply can't say that there is no distinction whatsoever between Democrats and Republicans.

    Agreed. They both utterly suck shit in completely different ways. :-)

  123. Emergency DVDs by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    I understand that the MPAA once said that people should purchase back-up DVDs: that is, they'd like you to use the same kind of prerecorded DVD for back-up as you use for your primary.
    So, even if torrenting material from a film DVD that you own a non-working copy of is legal, it will likely give the MPAA fits.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  124. Does this change the morality of copying? by Blue_Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sony are obviously worried that there are some potential customers left after CD protection, rootkit, incendiary battery, and DRM debacles to date - just to be safe they need this to drive them away too! Personally, I have been off Sony since circa 2003, and this just reinforces my view on this

    I don't pirate DVDs (or CDs) - I know how to, but to date I have only copied CDs I own to play at work (after some original discs were stolen after hours) and in the car, and the odd DVD I own to play in the laptop when I am away for work (don't want to lug/lose the original). I am not that fussed that other people do, but my basic ethics mean I don't. Here we have a Fair Trading Act that means that product that is not of merchantable quality can be returned. Were I interested in Casino Royale (I am not) I would officially now have no moral qualms about purchasing it, copying it, and returning for a refund.

    Sony, you have just changed the rules - you dont respect my rights, I won't respect yours, GAME ON!

  125. "Sony MEANT to include this copy protection" by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    You do realize that your argument would also have applied to Sony's rootkitted CDs?

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    1. Re:"Sony MEANT to include this copy protection" by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY! Who was held responsible for those CDs? Sony! Who had to provide redress to customers? Sony! Who also had to accept returns and reimburse retailers for the product? Sony!

      The retailer wasn't the solution there, either. Thanks to a settlement agreement, reimbursement was ordered (following the process I mentioned earlier in this thread). Absent any such court order or settlement agreement, like the current case, Sony gets to keep all of its money. So instead of buying Sony discs, ripping them, and returning them, someone needs to take SONY to task and not just screw retailers out of the money.

  126. So, what's a retailer to do? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    So, retailer will go broke if it stocks Sony DVDs because of too many returns.
    Retailer will go broke if it doesn't stock Sony DVDs because it will lose sales to everyone who is still stocking (non-working) Sony DVDs.
    Catch-22.
    I think a sensible retailer, given those choices, should want the one that keeps its customer service intact.
    I also believe that no brick&mortar retailer has "a full selection of titles." There are simply too many titles out there for that. Admittedly, having no Sony titles at all would be conspicuous, but I imagine that a creative retailer could fill the empty space with, say, extra anime DVDs and an explanation for the absence of Sony titles.
    No sane customer wants to buy DVDs that don't work. If a retailer makes clear that they don't stock Sony DVDs because Sony DVDs don't work, that may make up in goodwill what would've been lost from losing sales of any Sony DVDs that did work.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    1. Re:So, what's a retailer to do? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Precisely. The problem is that these DVDs *do* work for most people, and that the suggestion that started this thread does not treat the problem--customers shouldn't buy Sony DVDs at all if they want to send a message. Buying them and then returning them doesn't guarantee any sort of financial impact on Sony and doesn't motivate them to change. Low first-time sales is the only vector which provides leverage against these bullshit decisions of Sony.

      I'm sorry Slashdot moderators and posters don't understand implied warranties, but what I'm saying is not particularly hard to comprehend. Absent a court or regulatory order, nothing is making Sony pay for these returns. Buying and returning them still expands Sony's revenue, so Sony is still going to do it. Customers, further, are returning the discs claiming they aren't "fit for purpose" even though the only reason they make this claim is that they have a DVD logo on them (a logo which has absolutely no meaning to it aside from identifying the disc format--the DVD logo is carried on software titles, proprietary data discs, and video discs with and without copy protection and even machine-specific DRM). It is a faulty customer assumption that the DVD logo means that it plays in a consumer DVD machine, plain and simple.

      Yes, that is a reasonable assumption for a customer to make. No, it is not a warranty of fitness issue, and no, the merchant is not the responsible party. It is a misrepresentation claim, and Sony is indeed liable and responsible and should be taken to task. That's all I'm saying.

  127. Who's the arbiter again? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    Have you been following the pet food recall?
    If you have not, then know this: pet food of various sorts has been recalled by the FDA because of poisoned wheat gluten. I do mean poisoned--cats and dogs have died from it, of kidney failure. The FDA can't go directly after the manufacturer of the wheat gluten because it is in China. All the companies who used that wheat gluten, however, have to recall all the products that might have it. And any retailer who knowingly left recalled pet food on the shelves after it was recalled is, or will be, in trouble with the FDA.
    In short, two layers of middlemen are being punished for this, since the manufacturer is beyond the gov.'s reach. If you blame pet-owners for buying the poisoned food before the recall, we'll be ticked off--we didn't know, and we got no benefit from it--only risk. The retailers at least got money from any sales that didn't get sent back!
    This sort of thing would also apply to JERKY INC. and anyone distributing its products. If the government knew how to regulate tech, it would apply to these Sony copy-controlled DVDs and the stores that stock them.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    1. Re:Who's the arbiter again? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      No, that's a supplier-manufacturer liability issue. The ONLY retailers who have a problem are the ones who left the contaminated food on the shelves after being notified to remove it. Retailers have not received any such notice to remove these DVDs. If they did receive such a notice and ignored it, they would be liable, but still not for the same issues as the manufacturer itself.

      The manufacturer of the dog food has a strict liability to ensure that products meet specifications. Retailers and distributors have nothing to do with that liability phase and cannot (and are not, as your example illustrates) be held accountable for those problems.

      Failure to follow recall guidelines is a punishable offense; absent any recall notice, stores are not responsible. Pet shops have little to worry about in the way of legal responsibility with the pet food issue so long as they complied with all instructions. DVD retailers have not violated any instructions by stocking these products.

  128. Sony boycott by mlush · · Score: 1

    I was sitting in the car this morning and the thought popped into my head "How long should I carry on boycotting Sony?" (I have just not bought a Sony camera:-). Its nice to have one of life's great questions answered so quickly...

  129. Sorry, but no by FoamingToad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DVD = Digital versatile disc. This does not imply whether the content written on the disc is data, video, audio, or anything other than "just data".

    An earlier poster suggested there may be legal implications if Sony had used "DVD-Video" but AFAIK DVD is not a guarantee of any specific type of content.

  130. Sony versus Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what happens if Sony's DVDs don't play on a Sony DVD player?

  131. Sue them anyway. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what is meant by the term "Defective by Design."

    I'm no GNU fanboy, and I do even like certain limited contexts of DRM (Steam), but this, right here, is fucking unacceptible. I don't care that it's two parts from two different places, they are selling a product which DOES NOT WORK.

    Everyone seems to hate automotive analogies, but I do have to love them sometimes... Suppose you bought a car, and found the key didn't fit in the ignition? Isn't that fraud on their part? Never mind that they "might" give you a new key in a few months.

    This is a case where there needs to be a recall. No fucking firmware update, you take their DVD players back, and you give them their money back.

    Or yes, sue them. Class-action...

    I'm dreaming, I know, but I'm also pissed.

    WE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Sue them anyway. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      This is a case where there needs to be a recall. No fucking firmware update, you take their DVD players back, and you give them their money back.

      Why should the DVD player makers take the DVD players back ? They work perfectly, after all; it's not their fault that Sony releases disks containing malformed data. It's Sony's phony DVD's that should be recalled.

      To continue the car analogies: if your local service station decides to fill the gas pumps with tap water to "prevent criminal use of the car" or some nonsense like that, should your cars manufacturer recall the car when it fails to work with a tank full of water ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Sue them anyway. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Why should the DVD player makers take the DVD players back ? They work perfectly, after all; it's not their fault that Sony releases disks containing malformed data.

      You'll recall that Sony makes some of these DVD players.

      I'll let that sink in: Sony made the DVD players, and Sony made the DVDs. The DVDs do NOT work in the DVD players.

      (If you've realized your mistake, you can stop reading here; the rest is just silly car analogies.)

      Here's the key, here's the car. The car has public-key crypto in its lock system -- you must have a key with a microchip inside to turn it on -- and the particular kind of key you need hasn't shipped yet.

      To continue the car analogies: if your local service station decides to fill the gas pumps with tap water to "prevent criminal use of the car" or some nonsense like that, should your cars manufacturer recall the car when it fails to work with a tank full of water ?

      The analogy is going to break down here. It's going to be brutal and ugly, but here we go:

      Let's say Ford owns my local gas station. Let's say they try to fuel me up with, say, hydrogen, because we're all supposed to be driving fuel-cell cars by now -- in fact, it's not just my car, but they've replaced ALL their pumps with hydrogen. And they tell me that I should have gotten an upgrade, should have replaced my internal combustion engine with a fuel cell and an electric motor.

      So, of course, I ask them where I can get an upgrade. They tell me they don't have any working fuel cells, and, in fact, no one does, at least not for my car.

      So tell me how this is not Ford's fault, again? Or, how is this not Sony's fault?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Sue them anyway. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'll let that sink in: Sony made the DVD players, and Sony made the DVDs. The DVDs do NOT work in the DVD players.

      But I understood that other DVDs work perfectly fine in these DVD players ? And these "copy-protected" DVDs fail in other players too ?

      That's why I assumed that it's the DVD and not DVD player which is the problem here. That they are made by the same company is indeed ironic, and speaks volumes of Sony's quality controls, but it still makes Sony DVDs, not Sony DVD players, defective. Sony players are just low-quality, being unable to deal with defective DVDs, not outright defective :).

      Let's say Ford owns my local gas station. Let's say they try to fuel me up with, say, hydrogen, because we're all supposed to be driving fuel-cell cars by now -- in fact, it's not just my car, but they've replaced ALL their pumps with hydrogen. And they tell me that I should have gotten an upgrade, should have replaced my internal combustion engine with a fuel cell and an electric motor.

      So, of course, I ask them where I can get an upgrade. They tell me they don't have any working fuel cells, and, in fact, no one does, at least not for my car.

      So tell me how this is not Ford's fault, again? Or, how is this not Sony's fault?

      Of course it's Ford's fault. However, your car (DVD player) is perfectly fine; it's the fuel (Sony DVDs) which is the problem. Not that that really matters, I guess.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:Sue them anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as you say yourself, Sony makes some of these DVD players.

      I'll let that sink in... Sony makes some of those DVD players so other manufacturers make the other DVD players...

      So even if you might have a point with the Sony DVD players, it certainly doesn't fly for the other DVD players...

      or to rephrase the original question:

      Why should the other DVD player makers take the DVD players back ? They work perfectly, after all; it's not their fault that Sony releases disks containing malformed data.

      But honestly, even with the Sony DVD players you're not right (under a small condition): if the Sony DVD players perform according to the DVD standards and specs, not even Sony should recall their DVD players. Sony should however be forced to take back those faulty DVDs

    5. Re:Sue them anyway. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      if the Sony DVD players perform according to the DVD standards and specs, not even Sony should recall their DVD players

      However, they have claimed that they do not intend to change their copy protection scheme. So they either have to eat those words or be willing to refund their own DVD players.

      With the current trend, I strongly suspect that they will try to have their cake and eat it, meaning they won't change those DVDs. The question is, what could a court force them to do?

      What seems likely is that they will release a firmware update soon, and get away with this entirely. (Customers expect this kind of shit now.) As far as I'm concerned, if you're fixing a deliberate design flaw with a firmware update, you should be required to offer a refund, as well. I consider it to be a deliberate design flaw of either the DVDs or the players, and I'd like to give Sony a choice between offering refunds on all those DVDs and offering refunds on all the players -- not simply sending out a firmware update.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    6. Re:Sue them anyway. by mink · · Score: 1

      I think Sony wants to kill off DVD. Make 'em so they no longer work and then push bluray even harder since that nasty old DVD is no longer working.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  132. My PR department craps on Sony's by warm+sushi · · Score: 1

    "Sony will say that because of big bad rippers they had to update the security. "

    So? Everyone I know trusts me more than some lame ad on TV. If their hardware screws up do they wait for an ad to explain why? Hell no! They call me! (Dammit!)

    And I say, "Screw these guys, it's their stupid broken copy protection. Download this and rip it."

    End of story. Everyone wins. Except Sony.

    Simple really.

  133. Completely going the wrong direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The problem is people will end up getting what I liked to call a visual of the movie even if it is playable by the DVD player. I think Sony should just quit beating around the bush. They need to stop these illegal downloaders and rippers where it counts. I propose they quit including the movie with the DVD they buy. Instead, consumers must be forced two watch a 2 hour long RIAA copywrite warning screen. If they can't see the movie they can't rip it, right? Some people will say no one will buy a movie they can't play but who cares? Just so long as the illegal downloading stop.

  134. I think the purpose is slightly different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they include this stuff because they must have done the math that says if they can delay people from copying for "X" days, they get "$Y" more. They can't believe this will stop things for more than a week.

  135. That wouldn't happen at my house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Linux machine downloads full-time. Its completedtorrents directory is shared on the house network using samba. The data is copied over wireless to a powerful (AMD) Windows box. From there, I can:

    Watch it on the LCD flatscreen in my bedroom
    burn it to a DVD-RW and then watch it in my DIVX-aware Philips player (10 hours of data per disc, no transcoding delay)
    Transmit the VGA data by wireless to RCA-OUT on the big tv in the living room.
    Copy it to the media directory on my laptop.
    etc.

    I stopped buying CDs when Sony first starting putting virus code on cds to hack people's PCs (apparently at one point a state attorney general wanted to arrest a Sony executive for hacking, but I guess Sony lobbied its way out of trouble).

    I don't care for the MPAA/RIAA -- I think they must be bankrupted so that their replacements will have better manners, and so that they'll be amenable to a mandatory licensing schedule with a share of consumer broadband revenue (say, 10% of the retail a consumer pays for DSL or cable modem, business links exempted)

    The point is that legal media is no longer more expensive and less useful than "unofficial" downloads, it is now dangerous to insert a Sony CD or DVD into a machine. I'm sure Sony figured it was being restrained and responsible this time, as it only installed cumbersome DRM rather than trying to infect and take over the consumer's PC, which they did in the past. Yeah, right.

    Sony deserves to lose reputation, market share, revenue, and existence.

  136. Stranger Than Fiction Has Huge Errors On It by rb240sx · · Score: 1

    I couldnt get it to play on my computer or one of my dvd player (it crashed it I think). Sony is really getting out of control when you cant even watch a bad movie on DVD because they just made up a new format.

  137. Punish the Honest Ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just Sony that renders its own products incompatible with DRM. My brand new $1000 Phillips HDTV won't play upscaled DVDs from my band new $250 Phillips home theater system thanks to HDCP. The worst part of all of this: I'm an honest Joe. I've never pirated a song or movie in my life ... but I bet if I did it would be more likely to work with my equipment! I don't understand why these corporations insist on punishing their honest paying customers with DRM-related headaches, but I've had enough of it.

  138. Oh, I got it by worldcitizen · · Score: 1
    I think I can understand why they're doing it:
    1. DVD's won't play
    2. People will get pissed off and return them
    3. DVD sales figures will drop
    4. Sony will complain to the lawmakers that piracy is making sales drop
    5. Sony will get the lawmakers to somehow subsidize their business (e.g., blank media tax)
    The end result is that they will be able to produce junk and still get paid (a large number of European "filmmaking" business get subsidy money for producing trash that nobody cares to watch, why shouldn't Sony?...)

    :P

  139. Re:Gee....this is what anydvd says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Media is a Data DVD.
    Booktype: dvd-rom (version 1), Layers: 2 (opposite)
    Size of first Layer: 2084960 sectors (4072 MBytes)
    Total size: 4169920 sectors (8144 MBytes)

    Video DVD (or CD) label: Stranger Than Fiction
    Media is CSS protected!
    Video Standard: NTSC
    Media is locked to region(s): 1!

    RCE protection not found.
    DVD structure appears to be correct.
    Found & removed structural copy protection (Arccos, Puppetlock)!
    Found & removed bogus title set!
    Found & removed Autorun from Video DVD!
    Found & removed 83 bad sector protections!
    Emulating RPC-2 drive with region 1!

  140. Hahaha, Sony is so funny, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not even want to hear or see anything sony produces.

  141. Allow me to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bying media shouldn't be like a craps shoot. I want to be a good person and do things the legal way. I've never downloaded a movie, nor wanted to rip one. However as a good and loyal customer, things like this prevent me from doing it the right way. I'm punished for obeying the law. When I can't do it the right way, I do it the way that works. I break the law. I'm not proud of it, but when I paid for something to do a single thing, it had better damn well do it!

  142. Assides - Scene II, A Public Place by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Slashot: Sony!
    Sony: Ha! Who calls?
    MPAA: Bid every thought be still: peace yet again!
    Sony: Who is it in the press that calls on me? I hear a tongue, shriller than all the music by Celine Dion, cry "Sony!" Speak; Sony is turn'd to hear.
    Slashdot: Beware the ides of Ass!

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  143. keep returning 'em until they're out of 'em by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and they have to refund your money.

    if everything goes back to sony as "defective," maybe they'll get the hint.

    IMHO they can't call it a "DVD" unless it meets the published specs, including the copywrong protection system.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  144. It's not DRM... by nortcele · · Score: 1

    Sony just has to get the word out that you can't put Blu-ray disks in regular ol' DVD players.

  145. second free ad for DVDFab Decrypter .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    One of my roommates bought Casino Royale. To test it, I just grabbed it and ripped it in DVDFab Decrypter

    was Re:Gee. (Score:4, free advert)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  146. Sony and DRM by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Just another reason why I am boycotting anything Sony... They have received their last $$ from me - I even sold my WEGA TV last year and will not buy anything with their label on it (neither electronics nor media) until they make a 180-degree change in their attitude toward their customers in this regard. FU Sony!

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  147. F. Gump: Stupid is as Sony does. by norminator · · Score: 1

    Making Grandma update the firmware on a DVD player just to make it take two minutes longer for a pirate to copy a DVD is stupid.

    As many others have said, blocking legitimate users while failing to prevent piracy is incredibly stupid. Also, having to update firmware on a DVD player is incredibly stupid. They're just supposed to work. No updates, no installing software, it's just a magic black box that plays stuff. At the very least they should never have instituted a new anti-piracy program without first testing on a wide range of players, and they should have waited to release these "protected" discs until they had firmware updates for their own players (I don't care if they're different branches of a huge company... if they can't communicate for things like this, they are broken). And the firmware updates should be included on the DVDs that require them, so that they can be installed transparently and without any extra input from the user.

    That still doesn't fix the problem for the other manufacturers' players.

    When you think about it, though, it does seem very odd that they would invest in a new "anti-piracy" tech so late in the game for DVDs. Especially considering how awful their attempts at CD DRM went. It leads me to believe that maybe their not trying to protect DVD content, but make it seem like to consumers as if there is incompatibility in the DVD world, so we should all update to the new awesome Sony Blu-Ray world, where nothing is ever incompatible, and the sky is always blu, and everything is always perfect. And if that's the case, it's still incredibly stupid.
  148. I'll give it a 3rd, DVDFab Decrypter! by bogie · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a great program and hats off to the company for offering it for free.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  149. re: restocking by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    Mostly, however, restocking is a strategy to discourage big ticket purchases from being returned.

    The most common example is the big screen TV bought in early January, and then the return attempt the Monday after the Super Bowl.
    I don't think I've even HEARD of a restock fee on CD/DVDs, but that's purely anecdotal.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  150. Your jaded cynicism has broken my irony meter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's a little bit naive to expect one branch of a multi-national corporation to talk very well with another. Y'think Sony will sell me one that goes to 11?
  151. Is Sony doing damage control? by Kiralan · · Score: 1

    On their support site: esupport.sony.com http://esupport.sony.com/ : I'm sure it is just a coincidence that the 'Home Entertainment' and 'Television' links both return a '404 - Page not found', while the other links work >:-}

    --
    V for Vendetta: People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
  152. There is no distinction... by edawstwin · · Score: 1

    There is no distinction in that both parties want to control our lives and our money (albeit in different ways). The bottom line is neither party really wants to promote freedom. They only want to promote dependence on the government.

    --
    I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
    1. Re:There is no distinction... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Won't argue with what you say, but I will add that one party has a higher inclination to put me into harm's way, both physically and financially. As long as I'm alive, I can at least vote for lesser evil. But once you ain't got your breath, if you're voting it's likely as someone else's ringer.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  153. Wrong by Dion · · Score: 1

    BluRay and HDDVD support an identical set of codecs.

    BluRay is more complicated and generally more risky than HDDVD without any real gain, though.

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
  154. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd only help us break their DRM and possibly make new copies.

    I, for one, would prefer a new, working one at this point. Although I wonder where we'll be able to find anyone who can do better, my only consolation is that they'd have to try to do much worse.

  155. Sony is DEAD. by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Sony is DEAD to me. I will NEVER buy another product with their name on it.
    There are just too many other companies out there that "get it".
    I hope HD-DVD wins out over BLUE-RAY, cause I won't have anything
    to do with BLUE-RAY so long as Sony's name is on it.

  156. The problem with this.. by nevesis · · Score: 1

    Basically the DVD has hundreds of bogus VOB files.

    Most DVD players are smart enough to skip over them.. (mine wasn't).

    Most DVD decrypting software wasn't smart enough either.

    The difference is that those software packages just required a downloadable update. You're screwed if your player doesn't like bogus files.

  157. How sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though I have a degree in mathematics, I still parsed COS as the evil cult organization before I realized you meant the trigonometric functions.

    Besides, any DVD sent through the COS would probably end up unwatchable, just like Battlefield Earth.

  158. You have it all wrong by Dion · · Score: 1

    DRM doesn't work at all.

    All DRM does is to piss off paying customers and allow MAFIAA execs to tell their shareholders that they are doing everything they can to protect their "valuable IP".

    Now, with broadband it's easy for people to pirate content, so naturally you can't charge quite as much for the content as in the olden days, that's just the way it is, "supply 'n demand" and all that.

    Responding to piracy by dramatically lowering the value of your content will not magically make people want to pay you money.

    The MAFIAA needs to realize that they need to compete with casual copying the same way that they would a competing business, iow, provide a better product at a fair price.

    The price doesn't need to be 0 to compete with piracy, a CD or a DVD does come with built in storage, quite nice bandwidth and a license to the content, after all.

    For online content you'd really need to get close to 0, perhaps a donation system could be used so content can be distributed just like it is today, but you at least get some money back from the honest users.

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
  159. another blog talking about problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happened to a friend of mine, which he details here: http://baconandtofu.com/

    Movie just locks up after a couple seconds on his Phillips DVD player. Ridiculous.

  160. Broken by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

    That's it. They finally did it. Sony's latest has proven to be the proverbial last straw. For many years, my 'DO NOT BUY' list has had only four names on it. Now it has five. I know Sony couldn't care less about my never again purchasing one of their products, but millions of us will make a difference. Hide and watch.

    --
    Heard any good sigs lately?
  161. Well, now I know it's not NetFlix by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

    Go figure -- my Toshiba 5+ year old progressive scan DVD player, which plays most movies just fine, hasn't played Stranger Than Fiction NOR Casino Royale. I was about to drop $100 on a new Panasonic up convert model. At least I know it's not bad discs from NetFlix now. Dammit.

    IronChefMorimoto

  162. odd, it didn't work that way on the rootkit by alizard · · Score: 1

    and IMHO, there's NO way to spin Sony "DVD"s that won't play on Sony DVD players.

  163. Assume good faith, put it in writing--or not. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    Thank you. I didn't realize that the "fit for purpose" standard doesn't apply to DRMed work in America. Sorry I was so hard on you...
    If the DVD logo is all but meaningless--that's depressing.

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  164. dvdisaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to edit the source code. Change the case statement that classifies the type of dvd, this is very easy with gentoo. you can emerge dvdisaster, then use ctrl-c and edit the file and resume the compilation with fg.

    this modified version of dvdisaster is an excellent ripping tool and i find it extremely fast.

    there is also some program that allows you to merge multiple attempts at ripping to get the union of each attempt.

    dvdisaster is excellent, i found dd_help, all the various versions with slightly different names, to be a total pain, and didnt work for me. One of the versions scans backwards towards the error which is a nice idea but is terrible for dvd's cause the speed reading backwards is very slow (on my drive anyway). This wasnt the only problem either, i also found the resuming function didnt work as the log file system had bugs. One of the versions resumed ok but was so slow and had problems that made me give up.

  165. HAHAHAHAHAHAH (etc) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh man, you actually believe that?

    Hehehehehe

    Go on, try it in court! I dare you!

    I mean, you're obviously right... but... just... i mean... XP