Slashdot Mirror


Jack Valenti, Dead at 85

saforrest writes "Jack Valenti, a man whose influence in both Washington and Hollywood was profound, died today at age 85. He first became famous as special assistant to Lyndon Johnson: he can even be seen in the famous photo aboard Air Force One. In 1966, he quit this job to become president of the MPAA, from 1966 to 2004."

650 comments

  1. Obligatory by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 5, Funny

    I say to you that a stroke is to Jack Valenti as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone.

    RIP, Jack!

    1. Re:Obligatory by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoever rated this a 0 might want to go look up the entry on Valenti in Wikipedia. Specifically for his comment on the Beta VCR.

    2. Re:Obligatory by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hope it was painful as hell.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:Obligatory by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      And he was part of the media coverup of the Kennedy assasination.

      Darker thhan you have ever imagined.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Obligatory by adona1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Myself, I'm going to breach copyright by singing "Ding Dong the witch is dead" a few times ;)

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    5. Re:Obligatory by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ha ha ha, the old man kicked the bucket. Yay! The world's pest population just went down by one. Hope the next mafiaa bigshot dies soon.

      Tags: yay haha lol pwned owned mafiaa money business

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    6. Re:Obligatory by DerFeuervogel · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is my "New e-mail" sound for the day. Thank you for the idea.
      MP3 Link here:
      http://www.cyberbee.com/yesteryear/oz_37.mp3

    7. Re:Obligatory by Zabu · · Score: 0

      +1 Funny
      -5 Bad taste
      It is important to realize that both life and liberty are cherished, but the death of Jack does not make right any of the wrongs of the MPAA.
      Other /.ers, take this into consideration before cheering for the death of Jack Valenti.

      --
      It's all good.
    8. Re:Obligatory by jagdish · · Score: 1

      He was a worthy opponent. May he enter Sto-Vo-Kor with honor.

    9. Re:Obligatory by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I'll say one thing nice about Jack Valenti: I like his cheeks.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody dies. Death is a cause for celebration. People like my late saintly Grandmother are relieved of their earthly pains, torments, and burdens when they die, while when someone like Valenti dies, it's the rest of us who are relieved of a pain, a torment, and a burden.

      -mcgrew

    11. Re:Obligatory by fair_n_hite_451 · · Score: 1

      I had exactly the same "Wizard of Oz" moment.

      --
      Reason why there is hope for the future generation #364:
      "I wish my grass was emo so it could cut itself."
    12. Re:Obligatory by Wolfger · · Score: 1

      Myself, I'm going to breach copyright by singing "Ding Dong the witch is dead" a few times
      Curses! Foiled again! Somebody always beats me to the punch.
    13. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Curses! Foiled again! Somebody always beats me to the punch.

      The obvious solution is to move the punch bowl to a more advantageous position for yourself.

    14. Re:Obligatory by Kvasio · · Score: 1
      Like in South Park:


      It's been six weeks since Jack Valenti was killed by a pack of wild Boston stranglers and the world is still glad to be rid of him

    15. Re:Obligatory by Aliriza · · Score: 1

      R.I.P. Jack , We'll miss you and sure sometime later we'll come and visit you.

  2. Did Netcraft Confirm It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't believe until it's confirmed!

    -Nick

    1. Re:Did Netcraft Confirm It? by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's actually been dead for some time. The walking dead. Nothing much is going to change really. His corpse will still rise up every night and feast upon the living. He'll still be an abomination in the eyes of God. He's just taking a little ground rest for a few years. He'll be back worse than ever around 2015.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Did Netcraft Confirm It? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I won't 'til it's denied. We're talking the mafiaa here, remember?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Did Netcraft Confirm It? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Netcraft confirmed it; they also reliably inform me that, yes, Jack Valenti *could* run Linux.

      Further reports of Valenti's death are coming in; for reasons that are as yet unclear, he was found naked and petrified in Soviet Russia. When as we all know, old people like Valenti live in South Korea. And.... UUURGH!!!

      (Dogtanian is yanked off the stage by several angry mods)

      ....Natalie Portman has been implicated in the death and....UMMMMFFF!!!!...

      (RIP Dogtanian's karma, 2002 to 2007)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Did Netcraft Confirm It? by Troy+Baer · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing him with Keith Richards.

      --
      "My life's work has been to prompt others... and be forgotten." --Cyrano de Bergerac
  3. connection reset by peer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    pwned

    1. Re:connection reset by peer by kalirion · · Score: 3, Funny

      peer? I'd think he was kickbanned by the superuser.

  4. Frosty piss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...right on his grave.

    Rot in hell, you son of a bitch.

    1. Re:Frosty piss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use a urinal for a tombstone!

    2. Re:Frosty piss... by psaunders · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's funny, even with comment filtering set to level 5, this one still gets through...and +5 informative, no less. Informative how? Maybe it's a glitch in the /. mod system...

      --
      Karma police, arrest this man. He talks in math. He buzzes like a fridge. He's like a detuned radio.
    3. Re:Frosty piss... by redog · · Score: 1

      When is the funeral? Ill go if its close.

    4. Re:Frosty piss... by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's funny, even with comment filtering set to level 5, this one still gets through...and +5 informative, no less. Informative how? Maybe it's a glitch in the /. mod system...

      Careful! My karma was "excellent" two days ago. Then I commented on an Anonymous Coward post stating little more than "Bush. Worst. President. Ever." on a story that wasn't even about Bush getting modded "+5 Insightful." By the end of the day, my Karma was "Terrible". Read my sig for opinion of opinionated Mods. Read my Journal for SlashDot rules. Look at my Karma to see how well they are followed.

      Just my experience. May the mods have mercy on me.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    5. Re:Frosty piss... by biocute · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I guess all modern days villains' first request in hell would be "May I read the Slashdot homepage?"

      That'd be their final judgement.

    6. Re:Frosty piss... by BlackSabbath · · Score: 5, Informative

      Where my dad comes from in Greece (Lesbos - yes, my Dad is a Lesbian), they have a saying.
      phonetically: "Homa sto kolo tou, zoi se logo mas"
      which roughly translates as "Dirt up his arse, life to us"

      It is typically said when learning of the death of someone you prefer in their new state.

    7. Re:Frosty piss... by Benaiah · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...right on his grave.

      Rot in hell, you son of a bitch. the first post was so much more insightful than this.

      Velenti was famous for this quote.
      "I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone."

      And thus the first quote can be seen as quite hilarious.
    8. Re:Frosty piss... by curecollector · · Score: 1

      Keep on keeping it classy, Slashdot!

    9. Re:Frosty piss... by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Informative

      I got modded down as a troll and went from Excellent Karma to terrible, all because I made posts like:

      Please mod me insightful for no particular reason.

      It was on April Fool's Day. Were my posts offtopic? Definitely. Were they troll? Definitely not.

      The Karma system is broken.

    10. Re:Frosty piss... by bshensky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your piss deserves better.

      --
      Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
    11. Re:Frosty piss... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      No, he's lucky. He left us to rot in the hell he helped to make right here. He's already in his new world making it hell for them.

      --
      What?
    12. Re:Frosty piss... by some+damn+guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not me. I'm waiting for it to show up on TorrentSpy.

    13. Re:Frosty piss... by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Karma system isn't broken, it simply implements mob rule in a fairly direct manner. In fact, I'd argue that it's less broken than, say, democracy or (to stay on topic) intellectual property laws.

      I think what you meant to say is 'people are broken'. Which as a general statement seems to be true.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    14. Re:Frosty piss... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's funny how "free speech" advocates are silent when people silence speech that they disagree with.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:Frosty piss... by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1

      It's almost sad, but I can't even imagine anyone getting a (Score:-1, Troll) on this topic. (well... except for this comment... knock yourselves out)

    16. Re:Frosty piss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is, ever since I had my Karma as excellent, I post as Anonymous Cow...

      Oh, wait!

    17. Re:Frosty piss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not silent. They're just modded down.

    18. Re:Frosty piss... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      No. You get modded as a troll because you are a troll.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    19. Re:Frosty piss... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      With the large number of comments in the same vein on this thread, I'd like to propose a new nickname for the late Mr Valenti:

      Saltpetre Jack"

      Rich

    20. Re:Frosty piss... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Oh come on! It was some humor. I copied the typical stephen king troll and put it in a real article about someone dying. While you might call me a troll for finding humor in death, you'll also be calling quite a lot of other slashdotters trolls.

      Also even if I was trolling, it just proves my statement that the Karma system is broken as I wasn't modded a troll for the post.

  5. Good by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or, at least, it's a good start.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Good by paganizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think thats fair; take a look at the man's bio on wikipedia, he was at one time a valuable member of the human race, and flew 51 combat missions as the pilot of a B-25 during WWII.
      It wasn't until he got into politics that he turned evil, and after all, didn't we forgive Darth Vader at the end?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Good by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Darth Vader did something at the end to earn our forgiveness. As far as I can tell, Jack Valenti didn't kill the Emperor.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His dumbass probably bombed 50 concentration camps.

    4. Re:Good by ph4s3 · · Score: 1

      ...after all, didn't we forgive Darth Vader at the end?

      No.
    5. Re:Good by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ya know, you're right. Saddam was a good guy too. All that evil he did, let's just ignore that for a moment.. he brought democracy to Iraq long before Bush and Halliburton (who are also not all that bad, so long as you ignore the evil) and besides, he only did all that evil stuff cause that's the way politics are in the middle east. And he gave all those great speeches at his trial which we were prohibited from hearing cause, ya know, he might say stuff so evil it pops our ears or something.

      He's dead now, we should feel bad.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Good by eln · · Score: 1

      Okay, so he wasn't actively evil his entire life (that we know of). Hell, maybe he was eating puppies when he wasn't flying a plane back then. Or maybe he only developed a taste for puppy meat later in life. We may never know.

      I know we're supposed to find good things to say about people when they die, but when the guy has been basically evil for his entire public life, that makes things difficult. Ted Kaczynski wasn't always a serial bomber, but we don't spend a lot of time celebrating his life either.

    7. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Kaczynski was at least a mathematics professor, the man had brains and talent, and published some papers. He happened to go crazy. Jack Valenti? Well, let's see...we've got accounts of several hundred thousand counts of invasion of privacy, fraud, entrapment, and if you spun it properly outright treason (there have been state secrets leaked because of RIAA doings, they just haven't come into the public eye (yet)), as well as very likely two murders (they were in fact mentioned on the BBC *once* before they made that disappear...do a bit of digging and you should find 'em. I really ought to have written those names down), done in his name. Most, if not every single one, of these accounts are true. Hell, you could call the lobbying they did to get the DMCA passed treasonous. Just keep going and you could get a shoot-on-sight passed for every **AA exec, you just need the power.

      That's the trick. Money, power...there's no democracy in America, the common man is worthless.

    8. Re:Good by networkBoy · · Score: 1, Troll

      Ted Kaczynski wasn't always a serial bomber, but we don't spend a lot of time celebrating his life either
      At least teddy gave us IED training...
      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:Good by dsanfte · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fine. I mourn the Jack Valenti of the 1940s. I piss on the Jack Valenti of the 80s, 90s, and '00s.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    10. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think thats fair; take a look at the man's bio on wikipedia, he was at one time a valuable member of the human race, and flew 51 combat missions as the pilot of a B-25 during WWII.


      Oh so you mean aside from a Financial rapist, this guy was also a government sanctioned murderer?

      Fucking sweet!!
    11. Re:Good by Planesdragon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Darth Vader did something at the end to earn our forgiveness. As far as I can tell, Jack Valenti didn't kill the Emperor. Most of us are Christians. We are forgiven our sins against our creator for no reason at all.

      Rest in peace, Jack Valenti. May you find wisdom in heaven that seemed so lacking in your life on earth.
    12. Re:Good by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Good for you.

      As an ardent non-christian, I am more than happy to say that Jack Valenti died today. Leaving the world no poorer.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    13. Re:Good by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      The good that men do

      is oft interred with their bones,

      While the evil lives after them.

      So let it be with Jack.

    14. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is "us" and how do you know that most of them are Christians? Are you saying more than 50% of Slashdotters believe Jesus was the Son of God, performed miracles, and rose from the dead, after dying for the sins of all mankind? I missed that /. poll:

      a) Christian
      b) Muslim
      c) Jew
      d) Buddhist
      e) Agnostic
      f) Atheist
      g) Cowboy Neal!

    15. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I believe in a Cosmic Zombie Jew who was his own father, and demands fealty without proof, what could possibly contradict that? What are you some kind of terrorist loving, commie robot?

    16. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that he was a better person because he also killed people, probably civilians too, throwing bombs at them?
      Sorry, but my definition of war hero is something who fights the enemy when being attacked in his own land, not someone who bombs other countries.
      So far the hero count for the US is zero.

    17. Re:Good by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thanks for ruining the ending of the movie, dickhead. Have you never heard of a ***SPOILER ALERT***?

    18. Re:Good by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      didn't we forgive Darth Vader at the end?

      Not after we saw what a dick Anakin was in his early years. Getting his limbs burned off in lava was the only good part of the second trilogy.

    19. Re:Good by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of us are Christians. We are forgiven our sins against our creator for no reason at all.

      You're not a very good Christian.

      Forgiveness requires admission, repentance, atonement, and determination to not repeat past sins.

      You can't just absolve someone, for no reason.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Good by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Most of us are christians? What a funny thing to say. I'd have to agree that most Americans are christians (there are studies). However, for you to assert that "most of us are christians" leads me to think you're myopic.

    21. Re:Good by asninn · · Score: 1

      Most of us are Christians.

      Huh? Speak for yourself, Planesdragon. Do you have any evidence to actually back up that claim?

      --
      butter the donkey
    22. Re:Good by EonBlueTooL · · Score: 1

      "Most of us are Christians. We are forgiven our sins against our creator for no reason at all."

      And here I was under the misconception that it was jesus christ who died so that our sins could be forgivin! How that works I will never know (nor care).

    23. Re:Good by bblboy54 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, Jack Valenti didn't kill the Emperor.

      Actually, he did die. Maybe it' not worthy of forgiveness but it sure as hell helps!

    24. Re:Good by Doug+Neal · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can't just absolve someone, for no reason. Unless you're Catholic!
    25. Re:Good by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're not a very good Christian.

      Forgiveness requires admission, repentance, atonement, and determination to not repeat past sins.


      Depends on which brand of Christianity you subscribe to. Fundamentalist Protestants, for example, generally believe that to be forgiven by God, you just have to ask.

      And a rather famous (to medieval historians, anyway) involved Emperor Henry IV begging forgiveness from Pope Gregory VII. Gregory asserted that the throne had no right to meddle in the appointment of officials to Church positions, which was a departure from prior tradition. In response, Henry called for the election of a new pope. And in response to that, Gregory excommunicated Henry.

      The military situation at the time was in Gregory's favor, so to buy time and restore his political influence, Henry went to beg forgiveness from the pope, standing in the snow for three days wearing a hairshirt as penance. Since Gregory, as Pope, was required to follow the example of Jesus, he was forced to grant forgiveness to Henry and accept him back into the Church. This permitted Henry to maintain his claim to the throne of the Holy Roman Empire, which gave him the clout necessary to muster an army which invaded Rome with designs on ousting Gregory from the papacy. Gregory escaped with the help of the Normans, but when the Normans got to Rome, they didn't stop at removing Henry's forces. They sacked Rome, and the resulting outrage amongst the populace forced Gregory to flee the city.

      In other words, "a determination to not repeat past sins" is not a requirement for forgiveness, not even from the Pope.

      How we managed to get the subject from Jack Valenti to the Holy Roman Empire, though, is a mystery to me.....

    26. Re:Good by Surt · · Score: 1

      >>You're not a very good Christian.
      >>You can't just absolve someone, for no reason.

      >Unless you're Catholic!

      He said not a very good Christian. Or did you miss that day in catechism when they taught idolatry? ;-)

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    27. Re:Good by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      I don't think thats fair; take a look at the man's bio on wikipedia, he was at one time a valuable member of the human race, and flew 51 combat missions as the pilot of a B-25 during WWII.
      It wasn't until he got into politics that he turned evil, and after all, didn't we forgive Darth Vader at the end?


      I'm sure all the Germans/Japanese being blown up with Valenti's bombs were glad to be killed by such a good and valuable member of the human race.

      I'd bet that the members of the MPAA thought he was a great guy til the very end.
      It all depends on your point of view.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    28. Re:Good by jafac · · Score: 1

      ...and if you spun it properly outright treason ...

      Personally, I *love* conspiracy theories. They're very entertaining. Real or not.

      I can't find the link, but several years ago, I read an article claiming that Mr. Valenti, while working for the Johnson Administration, was part of the plot to cook-up the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which dramatically escalated US involvement in the Vietnam conflict.

      Even hairier conspiracy theory says that Johnson had Kennedy assassinated - not because of his stance on Cuba, but because of his stance on Vietnam (Kennedy was starting to withdraw advisors). Given that Johnson was from Texas, and involved in the oil industry (during his time as a congressman), a pattern emerges with regard to US Politics, Texas Politicians, Oil Company executives, and lying to get the US involved in wars. If that isn't treason, I don't know what is.

      If only the evidence were available to prove this in a court of law.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    29. Re:Good by Damvan · · Score: 1

      It was my understanding that most Christian sects in the US preach that only belief in Jesus Christ is necessary for admittance to heaven, regardless of your actions during your life.

    30. Re:Good by evilviper · · Score: 1

      In other words, "a determination to not repeat past sins" is not a requirement for forgiveness, not even from the Pope.

      Yes it is.

      Of course you can always lie to the clergy (which seems to be the issue you describe), but that's really besides the point.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    31. Re:Good by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Unless you're Catholic!

      I am, in fact, Catholic. You, apparently, are not.

      You aren't forgiven of your sins until you confess them (admission and repentance). It is implicitly assumed in confession that you will try not to commit those past sins again (determination). Then (for lesser sins) you are usually directed to pray the rosary several times to receive forgiveness (acts of atonement).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:Good by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      You aren't forgiven of your sins until you confess them (admission and repentance). It is implicitly assumed in confession that you will try not to commit those past sins again (determination). Then (for lesser sins) you are usually directed to pray the rosary several times to receive forgiveness (acts of atonement). Well, that's alright then!
    33. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, only Luke attended Vader's funeral pyre.

    34. Re:Good by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Gregory wasn't naive enough to think that Henry was forthright in his contrition.

    35. Re:Good by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Who is "us" and how do you know that most of them are Christians?

      I understand statistics.

      Most Americans are Christian. Most /.'ers are American. Therefore, absent any data to the contrary, we can conclude that most /.'ers are Christian.

      There is a tilt to the left, white, and dorky here -- but as none of those have a strong correlation to "non-Christian", well, it doesn't help your case much.

    36. Re:Good by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      /. is an American site. Or haven't you noticed the Politics Section, or the "Your Rights Online" section?

      Heck, /. is an English site. I'd wager that if you extend "American" to "native-English-speaker", you'd get much the same bias towards Christianity.

    37. Re:Good by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      You can't just absolve someone, for no reason.

      Sure you can. The Church tells you that you should repent, seek atonement, and all that crap, but the crap is their way of helping their followers to not sin again.

      "Through faith alone are we saved" means that God-the-Word forgave our sins for no cause of our own at all. Admission, repentance, atonement, determination, flagellation, beautification, or anything else you care to try neither helps nor hinders God's forgiveness of your sins. At best, they keep you from sinning in the future, and they usually make the world a better place--but they do jack and shit when it comes to Jesus deciding that you can walk on the wages of your sins.

      OTOH, being the kind of person who repents, seeks to make amends, and does the good and right thing without the Church wagging its ecumenical finger at you likely makes you the kind of guy who "gets it", and will get tagged by the Messiah in that eternal game of "who's on my team" we're all going to face.

  6. Bye bye, Jack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    May Satan put you in a screening room with nothing but heavily blocked and poorly encoded DivX movies playing 24x7xInfinity.

    Rest in Peace, sweet prince.

    1. Re:Bye bye, Jack. by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

      Screening nothing but Adam Sandler movies. After all, he's not there for the entertainment.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Bye bye, Jack. by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 5, Funny

      The 100 greatest movies of all time. On DVD. 60 inch plasma TV. Sound system on loan from Heaven. Region 1 DVDs, region 3 player.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    3. Re:Bye bye, Jack. by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1

      Better... 100 greatest movies, 120" concave immersive mini-Imax style display, surroundsound, vibrating chair, perhaps a hot date impatiently waiting for him to show her this fantastic movie he's been telling her about... and a Linux box, with a full GNU toolchain. Let him figure out how to reverse engineer the damn thing himself. How hard can it be? Jon Johannsen was only 15 when he released deCSS, back in '99. Perhaps we could let him have one of my deCSS tshirts with the source on the back. It's been washed so many times it's /almost/ undecipherable >:) (And it's not the full source anyway; there are two shirts, one with a large lookup table, the other being the actual deciphering functions.

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  7. He will be missed by paganizer · · Score: 1

    He will be missed... better the enemy you know, than the unknown that will rise to take his place.
    I think that's about all my Karma will allow me to say.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    1. Re:He will be missed by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Jack never saw a paradigm that he couldn't miss, or at least mis- understand...

      oh and ...Bright Blessings ;)

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  8. Good riddence by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "If you want to have a backup of a movie you should go out and purchase another copy of that movie." "The VCR is akin to the Boston Strangler." - Jack Valenti

    1. Re:Good riddence by Gulik · · Score: 1

      Gah. I think they should plant him twelve feet deep, just to be safe.

    2. Re:Good riddence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Fire that shit into the sun. I wish they could've done it while he was alive.

    3. Re:Good riddence by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Ya really think there's a chance of him coming back?

      Cause if watching every episode of Angel at least 10 times (yes, even the crappy 5th season) has taught me anything, it's that you need to quarter the body and bury the parts seperately.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Good riddence by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, just bury him face down.

      By the time he digs all the way to daylight, hell come up just in time to terrorize China’s thriving movie industry.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    5. Re:Good riddence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuke the grave from orbit - it's the only way to be sure

    6. Re:Good riddence by Deagol · · Score: 1
      Indeed. Now... when will Hillary Rosen go tits-up?

      There are very few people I'd literally pay to dance on their graves. These two are usually the first to come to mind.

    7. Re:Good riddence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mind instantly played out a couple of scenarios after reading that post.

      1. Upon exposure to so much movie piracy, Zombie Jack explodes, implodes, or otherwise is destroyed messily (imagine Superman thrown into a star composed of fusing Kryptonite (instead of hydrogen)).

      2. Zombie Jack breaks through the surface near a bootlegger's stand, and leaps upon him, devouring his brain messily. The body rises as another MPAA-Zombie, and the rate of growth follows a very swift logistic curve until China is completely occupied by them. The world falls soon after that, resisted only by small pockets of creativity. None are in Hollywood.

  9. C'mon by illegalcortex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's no point in acting like most of us liked him, even a little. We don't have to celebrate his death, but we also don't have to pretend he wasn't a douche.

    1. Re:C'mon by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We don't have to celebrate his death, but we also don't have to pretend he wasn't a douche.
      First comment I've read that didn't repulse me... Most people are celebrating his death, and that's just a little bit sick.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:C'mon by lordvalrole · · Score: 1

      Screw that! I am celebrating! The guy was an asshat and some people just need to go away. Now we just need the head of the mpaa right now to just go away. I put anyone working for the MPAA especially this guy as an evil bastard that need to die. Anyways, just my 2 cents

    3. Re:C'mon by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

      What's wrong with celebrating the death of your enemy?

      Honestly.

      I don't understand.

      Does the concept of death scare you so much that you don't like to think about it at all?

      Do you think the gods will get angry at us and strike us down too?

      Or is it that if you were an evil bastard who would sell his own grandmother for the right price, you would prefer people who abhore that behaviour to not celebrate your death?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:C'mon by renegadesx · · Score: 0

      Well I am throwing a party at my place (BYOB) in celebration

      Bring the champange, and charge it to his wifes tab

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    5. Re:C'mon by forkazoo · · Score: 1, Troll

      There's no point in acting like most of us liked him, even a little. We don't have to celebrate his death, but we also don't have to pretend he wasn't a douche.


      We don't have to celebrate his death... But I would certainly go to a party celebrating it if there was one to attend! Seriously, I would love to see a bunch of parties in really poor taste spring up all over the country this weekend. It'd be a nice way to let the people who want to follow in his footsteps know what we are willing to think of them. If anybody thows a Jack Valenti is Dead party in Boulder/Denver this weekend, be sure to email me.
    6. Re:C'mon by Lisandro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We don't have to celebrate his death, but we also don't have to pretend he wasn't a douche.

      Mod parent up, way up. First sane comment for this article. Sometimes /. comments manage to give me the creeps... so, you're all dancing arround his grave because he didn't want you to enjoy your movies the way you see fit? Grow up. Seriously.

      My condolences to his friends and family, if any manages to read these lines.

    7. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone else gets a sainthood at their funeral nowadays (if not before), no matter how pathetic their life, or how evil, or how twisted or worse, hypocritical. If they are famous you can bet the Pope will canonize them at some point, usually within 5 years.

      Modern celebration of life is as meaningless as having none at all, so it makes no difference.

    8. Re:C'mon by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because in an better world, you don't have to fight your enemies to the death.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    9. Re:C'mon by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Let me know when you find it, but its going to take a while.

    10. Re:C'mon by QuantumG · · Score: 0

      Well, in the real world, you have to wait for people who are good at their job to die before they are replaced by someone who is, hopefully, not as good.

      Or, ya know, catch them in some kind of scandal.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how many lives the "Sue first, ask questions later" campaign he was around for and approved of destroyed, I think celebrating his death with an insulting quip is tame. The people he ruined have to live every day with the consequences of his decisions. If there's a hell, I hope he's rotting in it.

    12. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with celebrating the death of your enemy?


      Because that makes you worse a man than he was. Do you suppose that Valenti thought that he was not doing the right thing? Celebrating his death makes you mean, and small, and unworthy of the freedoms you purport to advocate. This death will do nothing to advance the cause of freedom; celebrating it is petty and pointless.

      Perhaps you should spend some time learning to be a human being, before you leave high school.
    13. Re:C'mon by noidentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's no way any member of Slashdot could do what he's done. We might be able to act like him, but that's just acting. Posting a message expressing frustration with the damage this guy has caused is constructive and not damaging to anyone's rights.

    14. Re:C'mon by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so, you're all dancing arround his grave because he didn't want you to enjoy your movies the way you see fit? Grow up. Seriously.

      If you think that's why people are dancing, then you are the one who needs to grow up. Piss on that bastard and more generally on what he represented --- that if you have enough money you can buy the laws in our "democracy". May he roast in hell.

    15. Re:C'mon by normuser · · Score: 1

      Dont know about colorado, but there sure as hell will be one here (Dyess AFB, TX).
      Barnes hall, friday night, BYOB.

      *Karma go down the hooole*

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      XXX#######
    16. Re:C'mon by illegalcortex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Glad you and some other people get it. I don't celebrate his death because I don't want to be the guy who celebrates other people's deaths. It has nothing to do with the man and his life.

    17. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, way up. First sane comment for this article. Sometimes /. comments manage to give me the creeps... so, you're all dancing arround his grave because he didn't want you to enjoy your movies the way you see fit? Grow up. Seriously.

      My condolences to his friends and family, if any manages to read these lines.


      The creeps? Maybe because you're a weak motherfucker. Maybe you're an emo-boy.. I don't know.

      If its one of your family members or a friend, I can understand being upset.. but there was nothing.. NOTHING good about this ass. When you're dead you're a number.. a statistic.. you do NOT matter to most people. In his case he did quite a bit to piss millions of people off, and dying does not give him a free pass from that. You call it movies, I say it's an economic impact to the movie-watching citizenry in the interest of multinational companies. Yeah, inflict millions of dollars of bullshit on a lot of people and you reap what you sow.
    18. Re:C'mon by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

      Troll, my foot. That's exactly the point, and that's why I'm going to go drink champagne tomorrow. Jack Valenti, head of a racket that bought off the Federal Government, lived about 20+ years too long.

    19. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy moley, you're so fucking righteous that I just shit myself realizing what a horrid person I am! I have lived on this earth for over twenty years and now, only now, I see that my life has been a hate-filled sham!! From God's lips to your ears: I wish I was just like you. Oh please, please wise sir, kind sir, kind wise sir, I beg of you - please - can you teach me the way of the Buddah?

      actually, on second thought, instead of that, can you just shut the fuck up? I want to go rub my shit on his widow's windows. <(' ' < ) (> ' ')> <(' ' < ) (> ' ')>

    20. Re:C'mon by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard a rumor that friends and family got free moderation points :)

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    21. Re:C'mon by thewiz · · Score: 1

      While I also think some of the comments on his death are a bit over the top or disgusting, there ARE some people that the world is better off without.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    22. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Valenti's family is reading Slashdot to see the outpouring of grief at this very moment, I'm sure.

      You know what? Who gives a shit about your "righteous indignation," the guy stepped on the freedoms of millions of people for an entire career, if they feel good that he's gone, fine. You don't? That's fine too. But I'm sorry to inform you that there's no qualification that makes you the moral authority on how people should feel now that he's gone, absolutely none. You tell people to "grow up," and yet your refusal to acknowledge the viewpoints of others would suggest to me that if anything, you're the one who needs to start developing intellectually.

    23. Re:C'mon by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Agreed again, for the people by the people my rosey white ass.

      It's for the wealthy and rich who can pedal soft money to congress
      to buy them off to pass shit laws that don't help the people.

      RIAA/MPAA is just the Icing on a corrupt Enron/MCI/Worldcomm/Adelpha flavored cake.

      The greedy thieving bastards can all burn in hell as far as I am concerned.

      Freedom of Speech, respect it or get the fuck out.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    24. Re:C'mon by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Charles Manson, and a whole list of evil
      bastards including the perpetrators of the Inquisition, and any other "venture"
      where people were told by the rich and powerful how everyone else was going
      to live and die all at the benefit of a few Ultra Wealthy selfish jack asses.

      They can all rot in hell, and I will dance on their graves.

      When your Utopian paradise "better world" gets here, it will probably be free of humans.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    25. Re:C'mon by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You tell people to "grow up," and yet your refusal to acknowledge the viewpoints of others would suggest to me that if anything, you're the one who needs to start developing intellectually.

      Oh, for fucks' sake. The guy was a complete dick, but he is FAR from the worst that humanity has seen, as one might tend to beleive by the reactions shown here. This is not April 1945. And please, before you turn this into another "freedom of the masses" discussion, i'll repeat: all the guy did was restricting the way you're able to see movies. Read your local newspaper and check for yourself if there aren't bigger evils in this world.

    26. Re:C'mon by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he was more of a Turd Sandwich.

    27. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He fucked over a lot of people, please read more about what he's done. After this, if you can give any reasons why I should even pretend to give him respect then I'll strongly consider it.

    28. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should stop masturbating all over yourself while posting on Slashdot, because that's exactly what that post was. You stroking your tiny, four-inch ego with one hand and typing with the other. Fuck you, pussy.

      Perhaps you should spend some time getting fucked up the ass, before you leave high school.

    29. Re:C'mon by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so, you're all dancing arround his grave because he didn't want you to enjoy your movies the way you see fit? Grow up. Seriously.
      No. We are all dancing around his grave because he was the loudest and most effective voice advocating complete corporate ownership of culture - an idea that ought to be abhorrent to anyone with even a single creative bone in their body. Furthermore he was one of the prime orchestrators of the 1998 Copyright Extension Act which amounted to the absolute largest theft from the public domain in recent history.

      Valenti was a dinosaur of protectionism who worked tirelessly to hold the country back in the pre-internet era, seeking to do with legal means what could not be done with technical means. Instead of encouraging Hollywood to embrace new technologies and develop new business models incorporating them he pushed to outlaw them - trying to make the vcr illegal with his boston strangler quote is one example of just how far he was willing to go to distort the truth to repress technology. Regardless of one's beliefs about copyright and culture, he was no friend to nerds.

      The best thing that can be said about his passing is that if we are lucky, his death will mark the end of the era of the copyright dinosaurs and the beginning of one in which creative artists are directly compensated and society stops paying enormous taxes to distributors whom have set themselves of up as tolltakers without providing any significant value in return.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    30. Re:C'mon by syousef · · Score: 1

      Tell that to someone who's life's been ruined by a RIAA lawsuit. Immaturity aside, just how evil must a man be before we're allowed to celebrate his death? This man did a lot of people a lot of harm, and that harm continues even after he's dead. Political correctness and point scoring/karma whoring only get you so far in life?

      Just to end the debate in the traditional manner I'll bring up the Nazi's. Would you celebrate Hitler's death if you were a Jewish holocaust survivor? How about the guy in charge of your death camp?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    31. Re:C'mon by mopower70 · · Score: 1

      Dismount your self-righteous high-horse on the right please. Did Valenti think that what he was doing was the right thing? Not if he was as self-serving, greedy, and manipulative as his actions showed. And the world is NOT a better place when bad people die? Tell that to any of the thousands of people being sued by the RIAA should that entire organization happen to be swallowed up in some miraculously tragic sinkhole. If right and righteousness doesn't have the strength or influence to remove people like Valenti before they cause the harm they do, I'll be happy as hell when natural causes do.

    32. Re:C'mon by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But we mourn their passing, because they were human beings, and then we move on and live in the now better world. It's about respect and dignity, which still exist and are still important even if the human being in question was the lowest scum on the earth.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    33. Re:C'mon by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      you're all dancing arround his grave because he didn't want you to enjoy your movies the way you see fit?

      If "the way I see fit" is expressly permitted me to by law and he was trying to take that away from me, is there any reason NOT to be happy that he will no longer deny me my rights?

      This man turned the MPAA from a technical standards body into an opaquely unaccountable censorship board. I'd be lying if I said I was sorry to see him go.

      But I already expressed those feeling when he stepped down from his MPAA post a couple years back. I don't have any particular reaction to news of his death.

    34. Re:C'mon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      First comment I've read that didn't repulse me... Most people are celebrating his death, and that's just a little bit sick.

      I'm not so much celebrating his death as the existence of entropy.

      All systems are breaking down - thank goodness.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:C'mon by Surt · · Score: 1

      You're just obsessed with death like it is special. How about if we're just celebrating the end of him doing harm?
      I would have to argue that celebrating his death is important. It tells the world we didn't approve of what he was doing, and reminds others not to act like that. Shame is the mechanism by which society tells its members that this or that is not an appropriate way to act. As you've attempted to shame celebrating death. Each of us must decide whether or not to accept your shame, and anyone who reads this will have to consider whether our shame of Jack Valenti reflects on their actions as well as his.

      Since the Godwin rule is long gone in this conversation: do you also attempt to shame those who are glad Hitler is gone? I wouldn't even attempt to say that Valenti is close. But neither were his actions in the last 20 or 30 years of life good for society, though I imagine that both Valenti and Hitler were pretty sure they were doing right, they just weren't very reflective human beings. At least I can say I've thought carefully about it, and have read solid scientific research which backs my position, that shaming Jack Valenti at his death is right and good for human kind.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    36. Re:C'mon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      we mourn their passing, because they were human beings

      Frankly I mourn much more deeply when one of my pets dies than when some jackoff asshole who I would gladly have smacked upside the head repeatedly kicks the bucket. I don't really get choked up about the things we are ordered to get choked up about, like the death of an ostensible human.

      I mourn when a human who does good things for people passes away. I hoist a beer and sing a happy song when someone who is a leech upon creativity and a general impediment to goodness kicks the fucking bucket.

      People are animals. No one who eats meat should be sad just because some human has died.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:C'mon by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Ender, is that you?

    38. Re:C'mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no it doesnt. Your the exact same type of person who would pardon nixon. Whats so special about being human that we have to honour the bad ones as well as the good? Life isnt equal you know. Maybe when you leave college you will realize this.

      Death to your enemies makes you proud and strong, and not a cowardly moral apologist. You are simply afraid of the mob mentality lest you one day cross it.

    39. Re:C'mon by jafac · · Score: 1

      Do you suppose that Valenti thought that he was not doing the right thing?

      Not if he had even a vaguely similar sense of right and wrong.

      What really gets me, is this guy went to war, flew some fairly dangerous combat missions, to fight to protect the Constitution. Then he gets out of the military, and spends the rest of his life pissing on it.

      All he needed was a sense of right and wrong, to understand that representing an illegal cartel, and calling people criminals for taking a leak during a commercial break, was WRONG. But he continued to do it for decades. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I say.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  10. Odd thing to note by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why did the media leave out the part about someone driving a wooden stake through his heart?

    Until I see that footage, I'm not going to believe tha...

    (Hold on - someone's at the door.)

    AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH.....

    1. Re:Odd thing to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is footage, but we aren't legally allowed to view it.

    2. Re:Odd thing to note by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You know, this is the second time this week, that I find out about a person dying and someone is making a comment about driving a wooden stake through their heart. - the linked article is about the first president of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, who died on the 23rd of April.

      The linked article talks about the Communist Party in the Russian Duma refusing to observe a minute of silence and one of the members, Communist Michael Zapolev also suggested that a wooden stake should be driven through Yeltsin's chest (the guy was hard to kill, he faced death a few times in his life and until the two days ago managed to live through it.)

      Personally I feel that Yeltsin made many mistakes, including privatization of national resources that could not be fairly privatized, because they were developed by the entire country, however he never even tried to silence the media, who were quite hateful towards him, unlike Putin is doing right now. The guy might have just been the first and the last truly Democratic President of Russia. The Communist Party was forbidden by Yeltsin and a Communist leader, Zuganov lost to Yeltsin in elections in 96. I think the Communist Party has done more damage to the people of the former USSR than fascists did in the WWII, so I am with Yeltsin on that one, but the new Communist Party members seem to be vengeful little brats, many of them licked Yeltsin's ass while he was in power, and being little sluts that they are it is no surprise they behave like this today.

      Back to the topic, I don't think it makes you a great person to make hateful remark about a dead individual based on his politics alone, you are making it personal.

    3. Re:Odd thing to note by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      you sick bastard...

      i did laugh though

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Odd thing to note by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it makes you a great person to make hateful remark about a dead individual based on his politics alone, you are making it personal.

      Politics is personal. It's personal when someone can lose his house, car, etc. because a political lobby got copyright expanded in both scope and duration. It's personal when a cartel's desire for more profits makes criminal the free use of our computing equipment. Friend, there's not much more personal than having your freedoms taken away for the sake of someone else's business model.

      So you're right - what I posted does not make me a great person. But Jack Valenti couldn't have made it much more personal if he tried.

    5. Re:Odd thing to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Back to the topic, I don't think it makes you a great person to make hateful remark about a dead individual based on his politics alone, you are making it personal."

      Just so. None of us knew him. We all think we knew him. To someone he was a loved grandfather or uncle.

      Thing to question is, what is it that turns an enthusiastic, patriotic and smart guy into a what Valenti became?

      Times are changing, but pretty soon we're going to realise that prominent individual figures are not the problem, making them figures of hate is only distracting and we should accept that the system is seriously screwed. Rampant greed, agression, corruption and contempt for the ordinary people has grown in our nations corporations and they need cutting down to size and the reasonable rule of law re-establishing. The way Valenti thought about things is a symptom not a cause. He was just going along with a crowd who have the insanity to believe they can weild control over information and the pathological entitlement to think that they _deserve_ the right to rule instead of democratically elected governments.

      If you want to express your hate and disgust do it with your wallet. Boycott the shitmongers and their shoddy, crippled wares. Support free culture and make it really, really hurt the corporations until they're forced to correct their arrogant and abusive ways.

      Anyway, 85, the old bastard had a good innings. RIP Jack

    6. Re:Odd thing to note by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Hitler loved dogs and children. That doesn't entitle him to our sympathy in death. (Yeah, yeah, Godwin's law yadda yadda.)

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    7. Re:Odd thing to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't bother to carve 'aaaaaggh'. He'd just say it!

    8. Re:Odd thing to note by hughk · · Score: 1

      Yeltsin was a politician, not the best but definitely not the worst. He definitely was a drunk in his Kremlin days (a former colleague met him) which may or may not have been 'helped' by others in the Kremlin who wanted to exercise their influence through him. He had some positive achievements as well as some negative ones. Many of the negative points could also be laid at the feet of his western advisers who promoted rapid privatisation which required the infamous loans for shares. Note that these consultants had no experience to draw on, so they screwed up. It was the same discredited theories that were applied by Bremmer in Iraq. Privatisation in China was advised by Europeans who having hexperience of it themselves, suggested a slower pace to ensure that the economy could absorb it and be supported by an infrastructure. However, Yeltsin managed to roll back the state's influence in may areas and to improve democracy.

      All that could be said of Valenti is that he managed to replace the Hays code but otherwise his protectionist measures have certainly caused more long-term harm to the industry than good.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    9. Re:Odd thing to note by Builder · · Score: 1
      Back to the topic, I don't think it makes you a great person to make hateful remark about a dead individual based on his politics alone, you are making it personal.

      There's a great piece that I like to quote from Altered Carbon, by Richard Morgan...

      The personal, as everyone's so fucking fond of saying, is political. So
      if some idiot politician, some power player, tries to execute policies
      that harm you or those you care about, TAKE IT PERSONALLY. Get angry.
      The Machinery of Justice will not serve you here - it is slow and cold,
      and its theirs, hardware and soft-. Only the little people suffer at the
      hands of Justice; the creatures of power slide out from under with a
      wink and a grin. If you want justice, you will have to claw it from
      them. Make it PERSONAL. Do as much damage as you can. GET YOUR MESSAGE
      ACROSS. That way you stand a far better chance of being taken seriously
      next time. Of being considered dangerous. And make no mistake about
      this: being taken seriously, being considered dangerous marks the
      difference, the ONLY difference in their eyes, between players and
      little people. Players they will make deals with. Little people they
      liquidate. And time and again they cream your liquidation, your
      displacement, your torture and brutal execution with the ultimate insult
      that it's just business, it's just politics, it's just the way of the
      world, it's a tough life and that IT'S NOTHING PERSONAL. Well fuck them.
      Make it personal!


      Sure, it's from a fiction book. But that doesn't mean it's not true!
    10. Re:Odd thing to note by alienmole · · Score: 1

      But Jack Valenti couldn't have made it much more personal if he tried.
      Which is presumably exactly why his zombified corpse was knocking at your door earlier...
    11. Re:Odd thing to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He wouldn't go to the trouble to write 'AARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHH', he'd just say it!"

      "Well... perhaps he was dictating."

    12. Re:Odd thing to note by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sure, you are +5 Insightful, but in Russia the Communist member Michael Zapolev will no longer be able to get the floor as a speaker for his suggestion to drive a wooden stake into Yeltsin's chest.

    13. Re:Odd thing to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      King Arthur: What does it say, Brother Maynard?
      Brother Maynard: It reads, "Here may be found the last words of DoofusOfDeath. He who is valiant and pure of spirit may find the holy grail in the Castle of AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH..."
      King Arthur: What?
      Brother Maynard: "The Castle of AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH
      Sir Bedevere: What is that?
      Brother Maynard: He must have died while carving it.
      King Arthur: Oh come on!
      Brother Maynard: Well, that's what it says.
      King Arthur: Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't have bothered to carve 'AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH'. He'd just say it.
      Sir Galahad: Maybe he was dictating it. :)

    14. Re:Odd thing to note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *clap clap clap*

    15. Re:Odd thing to note by ChronosWS · · Score: 1

      And besides, just because you died doesn't mean you get the benefit of a reprieve from your duly-deserved criticisms. After all, everyone dies eventually, it's not like it was something special you did that deserves sudden compassion. And it's not like we are all wishing ill of his family. But their grieving process is NOT our grieving process, and doesn't need to be. If, when you go out, you don't want people dancing on your grave, then don't do things during your life which will cause them to do so.

  11. rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ahh, poor Jack. A nice guy who liked movies but didn't have a clue about how other people enjoyed them in the 21st century.

    Rest in peace Jack.

    (In heaven, there's no copyright law to violate. Everything is P2P. For reals!)

    1. Re:rest in peace by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Now that gives me an idea...Someone should steal the body, cremate it, and spread his ashes via bitchtorrent.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    2. Re:rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (In heaven, there's no copyright law to violate. Everything is P2P. For reals!)
      Sure, and when you die you get 72 MP3s that belong to you.

      You crazy mp3slims!
    3. Re:rest in peace by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      thats funny, in a very sick way. you might want to try submitting that to bash.org or the likes.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    4. Re:rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you mean to say, "rip in peace"??

    5. Re:rest in peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (In heaven, there's no copyright law to violate. Everything is P2P. For reals!)
      Now, now - that would be your heaven. For him, that would be Hell. It's not nice to wish so on the recently departed.
  12. RIP Jack Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:RIP Jack Valenti by Daengbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can't believe you're the only one (at this point) to make this joke. I opened the page specifically to count the number of "Truly andAmerican icon"s. I'm disappointed in the Slashdot community.

  13. Guestbook by chandoni · · Score: 1

    To share your memories or express condolences, there is an online guestbook.

    1. Re:Guestbook by plover · · Score: 1

      I'm glad they screen the comments before they're posted. I'd be sad if any of the internet vitriol was to actually make it to his family.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Guestbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it looks like they really screen all the comments. But I'm trying enywho :)
      *crosses fingers*

    3. Re:Guestbook by hdparm · · Score: 1

      From that page: Entries are free and are posted after being reviewed for appropriate content.

      Is this the reason for only 2 [two] entries so far?

    4. Re:Guestbook by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is he also looks a tad bit evil in his pic.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    5. Re:Guestbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If enough folks post a comment, how efficient will be the screening.
      As of now anyway it only has 2 guest listings :)

    6. Re:Guestbook by wizzahd · · Score: 1

      "Entries are free and are posted after being reviewed for appropriate content."


      I love how there are only two entries that have been accepted.
  14. Wicked Witch of the West? by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

    Ding dong, the witch is dead..

  15. Good-Dig dong the poster is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm. I wonder if I can get QuantumG to give the eulogy at my funeral?

    ---
    Funny that my captcha is "forgive".

  16. He'll be back. by grub · · Score: 1


    Jack's coffin will have some soil from his native Transylvania in it.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  17. RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jack Valenti may have been a pro-copyright lobbyists that we all despise, but he was still a human being that had done more in his life for his beliefs than we can only hope to achieve. I send condolences to his friends and family.

    1. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>that had done more in his life for his beliefs

      His belief was that fair use should be outlawed because it interfered with corporate profits and you're praising him for that?

      I understand it's crass to speak ill of the dead, but Valenti wasn't a terribly nice guy.

    2. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but he was still a human being that had done more in his life for his beliefs than we can only hope to achieve.

      You could say the same thing about Hitler. Obviously Jack Valenti was nowhere near that level of evil, but he was still a moron who made the world a worse place. So fuck 'em. Good riddance.

    3. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      "His belief was that fair use should be outlawed because it interfered with corporate profits and you're praising him for that?

      I understand it's crass to speak ill of the dead, but Valenti wasn't a terribly nice guy.
      "

      What have you done for your beliefs? I'm not praising him for what he has done and many people don't agree with them. I'm praising him for his conviction. I wish everyone had that same dedication for their beliefs, then there wouldn't be the discussion about 'fair use' and IP issues.

    4. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, despite the evidence, do you persist in assuming good faith about what he did? I think he was a very good lawyer. I don't think he believed half the stuff he said or acted in advocacy of. I do think he was a bad person for what he acted in advocacy of and how he did it. There is more to life than the fat paycheck. Or is there?

    5. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by The13thSin · · Score: 1

      "What have you done for your beliefs? I'm not praising him for what he has done and many people don't agree with them. I'm praising him for his conviction. I wish everyone had that same dedication for their beliefs, then there wouldn't be the discussion about 'fair use' and IP issues."

      Though it's a nice sentiment, and I agree some people should act more and talk less, it's also a bit of a rediculous notion: "I wish everyone had that same dedication ..."? If that were true you'd have a million lawsuits a day and 100 million people trying to be president... As sad as it sounds, any democracy needs sheep... let's just try to keep those sheep well-informed...

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
    6. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      "Obviously Jack Valenti was nowhere near that level of evil, but he was still a moron who made the world a worse place.

      I don't agree with anything Valenti did while lobbying copy-right laws, but I do admire his conviction. I just wish others like you and I would have the same vigor and dedication against those IP laws. He did (albeit bad) do a lot.

      His friends and family have my condolences.

    7. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I'm praising him for his conviction."

      Hitler had conviction too.

    8. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      "Why, despite the evidence, do you persist in assuming good faith about what he did?"
      You are correct, I don't assume he did his actions in good faith. It might have been for the simple goals of money and/or fame. I never personally met the man, but from what I have read about his devotion to the IP topic, I can only assume he was dedicated to securing IP laws for the MPAA. I never agreed with his views, but it is my right to admire his dedication.

      Apparently, other slashdoters are now comparing him to Hitler. This unfair to his friends and family and the Jewish community.

    9. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by yoyoofthemilk · · Score: 1

      "It is better to be hated for who you are, than to be loved for someone you are not."

    10. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if your measure of a man is simply his conviction and dedication to his beliefs, why do you have a problem with the comparison?

    11. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Blind admiration for "conviction" is pretty silly. People who are determined to, say, gain personal power, generally do more damage to the overall happiness of the human race than people who just live normal lives without any delusions of grandeur. Admiring people basically for having such delusions(since you're not taking what he was actualy convinced of into account, that seems to be all that's left) seems counter-productive.

      To put a spin on the old cliche: all that is required for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.

      (Of course, "evil" is a very strong word, but I sincerely believe that many people who have had "conviction" have done more harm than good. A sibling post played the Godwin card, but there are many less obvious examples.)

    12. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Adolf Hitler may have been a mass murdering, country invading, ethnic cleansing dictator that we all despise, but he was still a human being that had done more in his life for his beliefs than we can only hope to achieve. I send condol....
      Wait a second...

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    13. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by jmv · · Score: 1

      had done more in his life for his beliefs than we can only hope to achieve

      And that should always be a good thing? I'm sure most genocides have been carried out by people that fit the description above. It's the same for intelligence. You can use it to do really good things or really bad things.

    14. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      Or to paraphrase a comment from Bette Davis about the death of Joan Crawford:
      "they say you should only speak good of the dead. He is dead. GOOD!"

      Karma be damned.

    15. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      What have you done for your beliefs?

      i try not to push them onto the others for one thing.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    16. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by nugneant · · Score: 1

      As does Jack Thompson. Now there's a man who is not afraid to stand up for what he believes in! A fine individual if I

      okay can't go on, i already feel sick in my stomach. but seriously, "he was a human being with convinctions" is about the dumbest thing I've read on slashdot in the last six months, including first-post spam.

    17. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by acacia · · Score: 1

      And do no harm.
      And try to advance humanity.
      And strive for understanding.
      And be gentle to humanity, including myself.
      And forgive the trespasses of others.

      Those are the the qualities of greatness. Some guys in history had those qualities and started some pretty big movements. What a shame that those movements themselves became the enemies of their ideals.

      Great conviction in the righteousness of tyranny still subverts democracy. Great effort in the service of tyranny still makes you an enemy of freedom.

      --
      ~Religion is O.K., as long as it gets you laid.
    18. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing something wrong with vigor doesn't make it impressive, it makes it worse.

    19. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      "i try not to push them onto the others for one thing."

      That is a very good start. Now we need to move towards other IP and pro-consumer issues. :)

    20. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      I'm sure most genocides have been carried out by people that fit the description above...

      Wow! What did he do to kill you or your types? I've never supported his views but genocide is a little rough. Freedom of IP is not genocide... there is freedom of information, but it is not genocide.

    21. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      Wow loraksus! I'm sure Jack's family would love to hear your euligy.

    22. Re:RIP Mr. Valenti by jmv · · Score: 1

      Where did I say he committed a genocide? I'm just saying that "had done more in his life for his beliefs than we can only hope to achieve" fits just as much for really great people, as well as really bad people (genocide being the extreme in that case).

  18. mod parent up by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He should have been hung as an enemy of our rights as Americans.

    I know some people that were sued by the MPAA under his regime, who didn't have any pirated movies, and who were nearly ruined by legal expenses.

    I don't care about angry MPAA fans and their mod points, he deserves a long line of people waiting to piss on his grave for the laws he and the RIAA have inflicted upon an unwilling majority of citizens in this country.

    It's been ages since I've been to a movie because of him.

    It's all anime for me now.

    Not a dime to the MPAA-affiliated studios until the DMCA is shot down and buried for good.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:mod parent up by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      yes right because your going to have the follow through to double check those names.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:mod parent up by fotbr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      BZZZT, wrong.

      You don't get court provided attorneys for civil matters, which is what a lawsuit is.

    3. Re:mod parent up by jimmydevice · · Score: 3, Funny

      Silentchris throws another log of karma on the fire.

    4. Re:mod parent up by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care about angry MPAA fans and their mod points

      I'll go along with SilentChris' incredulity. I don't remember any fans of the MPAA on slashdot, ever, at least since the DeCSS deal, and even then, the general mood against MPAA was chilly before that.

      That doesn't mean the fans don't exist, but I'd think that they would be an insignificant minority. As such, they wouldn't have enough mod points to do anything about the seemingly legions of MPAA anti-fans that are on slashdot.

    5. Re:mod parent up by kypper · · Score: 4, Funny

      He should have been hung as an enemy of our rights as Americans.
      He may well have been hung, but I believe you meant hanged...

    6. Re:mod parent up by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I don't care about angry MPAA fans and their mod points, he deserves a long line of people waiting to piss on his grave for the laws he and the RIAA have inflicted upon an unwilling majority of citizens in this country.

      Give me a fucking break. Are you fucking kidding me? It takes a lot of nuts to say something that retarded. It's like some scumbag politician standing in front of a group of his fellow Christians and saying "I don't care what anybody says, I love children! Oh, and God! I don't hare if the enormous God and children hating contingent of this group hates me for it, I've said it!".

      Retard.

    7. Re:mod parent up by renegadesx · · Score: 0

      If there was ever a Slashdot expo and the MPAA showed up they would get torn limb from limb. MPAA, RIAA and Microsoft are almost like the eternal sinners of Slashdot

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    8. Re:mod parent up by slughead · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's been ages since I've been to a movie because of him.

      It's all anime for me now.


      Now that really IS a travesty.

      Personally, I disliked Jack way before any of YOU people did... well I hated him for stuff he did earlier, at any rate.

      I'll always remember him as the SOB who helped the (even bigger SOB) LBJ win office by really shady tactics. In a documentary about Barry Goldwater (LBJ's opponent), Jack basically said "yeah, it was messed up, but it's OK cuz it worked!" Yeah, thanks for Vietnam, cock.

      Of course, the MPAA rating system (which has a really Excellent documentary written about it) has pretty much borked the movie industry.

    9. Re:mod parent up by anagama · · Score: 1

      I can tell you there is no right to free counsel in WA state for most civil matters (cases dealing with termination of parental rights are one exception, civil commitments probably another). For the most part, the idea is that providing free counsel to anyone who wants it would increase litigation in an already litigious society. I have no idea if NY offers free lawyers to anyone, but I do find it hard to believe. Got a citation?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    10. Re:mod parent up by xerxesVII · · Score: 2, Funny

      He may well have been hung, but I believe you meant hanged...

      But was he well hung?
      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    11. Re:mod parent up by voisine · · Score: 1

      "He should have been hung as an enemy of our rights as Americans"

      The man was a lobbiest. The poeple who should be hung are the legislators who accepted his bribes in exchange for our liberties.

    12. Re:mod parent up by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      what do you mean "almost"? the only one that you didn't mention is SCO...

    13. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats hard to know so to speak, safe bet he's not ready for his money shot now.

    14. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please don't say fuck. You don't have to in order to make a point, you know.

    15. Re:mod parent up by Znork · · Score: 1

      "the idea is that providing free counsel to anyone who wants it would increase litigation in an already litigious society."

      On the other hand, if it's dumped on the taxpayers bill and the actual cost becomes visible, maybe there'd be a stronger political pressure to deal with the various reasons for the litigiousness.

    16. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, there's a couple more jokes in this discussion that need to be spelled out to twelve year olds. Could you tackle those next? Thanks!

    17. Re:mod parent up by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      "He was beaten severely, then hung from the nearest tree."
      "No, no, human beings are hanged. Dead meat is hung."
      "He was beaten severely, then hung from the nearest tree..."

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    18. Re:mod parent up by Riktov · · Score: 1

      Well, he may well have been well hung, but well never know, well we?

    19. Re:mod parent up by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I don't care about angry MPAA fans and their mod points

      Good - if you did, it would show that you take this site far too seriously. Mod points and karma are irrelevant, and I speak as someone who hit the karma-cap back when you could see how many points you actually have instead of this silly textual description.

      Apart from that, I more or less agree with you; the loss of any human life is a tragedy, but some certainly feel a whole lot less tragic than others.

    20. Re:mod parent up by aurelian · · Score: 1

      would you mind not swearing please? There are kids reading this for fuck's sake.

    21. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he didn't say fuck to make a point. Maybe he just felt like saying it. You don't have to avoid saying fuck to appease the easily offended, you know.

    22. Re:mod parent up by node+3 · · Score: 1

      The man was a lobbiest. The poeple who should be hung are the legislators who accepted his bribes in exchange for our liberties. If you're going to let him off the hook simply because he was a lobbyist (the "he was just using the system for his advantage" defense), then why doesn't it apply to the politicians (accepting his bribes is certainly in using the system to their advantage)?

      The problem is that corporate lobbyists can exist in the first place. Corporations should have no right whatsoever to exert influence in government. Corporations are great as economic entities, but are atrocious as political entities.

      And no, I definitely do not give the politicians a pass, but neither will I do so for Valenti. They've all made the world a worse place by their actions in the matter of copyright.
    23. Re:mod parent up by jlp2097 · · Score: 1
      BS. Quote Merriam-Webster:

      Inflected Form(s): hung /'h&[ng] /; also hanged
        usage: For both transitive and intransitive senses 1b the past and past participle hung, as well as hanged, is standard. Hanged is most appropriate for official executions "he was to be hanged, cut down whilst still alive...and his bowels torn out -- Louis Allen" but hung is also used "gave orders that she should be hung -- Peter Quennell". Hung is more appropriate for less formal hangings "by morning I'll be hung in effigy -- Ronald Reagan"


      And don't swoosh me :-)
    24. Re:mod parent up by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      It's been ages since I've been to a movie because of him.

      It's all anime for me now.

      No wonder you're pissed.

    25. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The man was a lobbiest.

      Personally, I think he was the lobbiest.

    26. Re:mod parent up by packeteer · · Score: 1

      If anyone gets that joke it's 12 year olds.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    27. Re:mod parent up by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Maybe hes a pheasant pluckers son?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    28. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Past tense, as in hanging after his death does us little to no good.

    29. Re:mod parent up by KefabiMe · · Score: 1

      lol, it looks like they had enough mod points today!

    30. Re:mod parent up by rgravina · · Score: 1

      "he was to be hanged, cut down whilst still alive...and his bowels torn out -- Louis Allen"

      Ouch!
    31. Re:mod parent up by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Lots of talking I see going on in these comments. Lots of talking. I suspect in real life, in any sort of confrontation with power, there would be just as much bending over.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    32. Re:mod parent up by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      The fact that that's the actual origin of the term makes it not-funny.

    33. Re:mod parent up by kwandar · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, thanks for Vietnam, cock." If I'm not mistaken, Vietnam was Kennedy's doing, wasn't it?

    34. Re:mod parent up by operagost · · Score: 1

      Was he well hung? Only his coroner knows for sure!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    35. Re:mod parent up by slughead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vietnam was Kennedy's doing, wasn't it?

      We had "advisers" in there as early as Eisenhower. There was some escalation under Kennedy but not very much. LBJ escalated the conflict out of a seemingly insane attempt to 'save face' to show we weren't going to be intimidated by those [insert racial epithet]. More Americans died in Vietnam under LBJ than any other president. There's a documentary called "The Fog Of War" that shows a recorded conversation between Robert MacNamara and LBJ talking about the supposed torpedo fired at US boats around Vietnam which instigated our involvement (recent evidence shows this torpedo never existed). The conversation makes it clear that LBJ was basically a nut and a warmonger who wanted to "kick some ass" (actual quote).

      As much as I'd like to blame Kennedy for Vietnam (so people would stop idolizing the guy), it really was LBJ's war.

      Oddly enough, Jack Valenti's campaign against Goldwater painted Barry as the warmonger. Funny how that works out.

    36. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    37. Re:mod parent up by polyex · · Score: 1

      "It's all anime for me now." Thats going to kick your social life into full gear!

    38. Re:mod parent up by Suzumushi · · Score: 1
      You are so right, it's not even funny.

      Everyone dances on his grave now...but who stood up to him while he was alive?

      Still, we can take some delight in knowing that if there is a hell, it has a new wing dedicated to him. It probably is just a TV and a DVD player, but all the discs are scratched or the wrong region.

    39. Re:mod parent up by pNutz · · Score: 1

      Barry was ready to escalate a much bigger war than LBJ.

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
    40. Re:mod parent up by russotto · · Score: 1

      Everyone dances on his grave now...but who stood up to him while he was alive?

      DVDJon and every other developer, trafficker in, or even knowing user of DeCSS -- that is, a lot of people here. Not to mention pre-Universal Sony.

    41. Re:mod parent up by slughead · · Score: 1

      Barry was ready to escalate a much bigger war [cold war] than LBJ.

      Barry was a staunch cold warrior, but that doesn't mean he would have escalated it any further than it already had been. His pragmatic nature virtually insures he wouldn't have had such an emotional and irrational view towards Vietnam (which caused the deaths of 50,000 Americans).

      One thing, which comes right back to this (Valenti) article, is that Barry would've been very much against the DMCA (if he'd lived to see it). He was very much pro personal and economic freedoms (libertarian, with a lowercase L), and was even pro-abortion and indifferent to gays in the military.

      If this country had turned out the way Barry wanted it to, there would be no patriot act, DMCA, or any of this other crap. LBJ and Valenti, on the other hand, represent the authoritarian and "security first" mindset that dominates modern political thinking. People don't realize the critical point that election really was. LBJ even said as much when he touted that he would "finish the work of the New Deal." He sure did. He massively increased the size of government, and proved that the American people could indeed be bought with their own money, as well as fake money, hot of the presses.

      LBJ's mantra was "guns and butter"... Sounds just like Bush with his massive social and military spending, doesn't it?

    42. Re:mod parent up by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      no right to free counsel...

      Clarification -- it's "right to counsel." If you can pay, you have to pay. Even in a criminal case.

      As for a cite, well, not at the moment. It's almost midnight, and work beckons in the morning. Send me a cite as to the "no right to counsel in WA" claim, and I'll find the comparable one in NY.

    43. Re:mod parent up by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      For the most part, the idea is that providing free counsel to anyone who wants it One of these days I'm going to remember to state my /. posts with the same anal nuance I'd need to in a law office.

      You're correct. There is no right to counsel in a civil matter. If you can't afford an attorney, you may very well have to stand up and defend yourself. But then again, you might also if you're not poor, just cheap.

      As I said, if there's no law against it, you can ask a judge to appoint an attorney for you. This attorney would likely not be a public defender, but rather a random attorney who needs to get his X hours of pro-bono work done. You might even get stuck with a bill (especially if you're suing someone, and you win.) I know there's precedent for it in NY, and an actual attorney (or even someone with a law library) could probably dig you up a few dozen principles.

      If you find need to go to court, and genuinely cannot afford an attorney (not "the best attorney in town", but any warm body with the right credentials), and you can convince a judge that your case deserves to be heard in court, the judge may appoint an attorney for you. If you're accused of a crime, then SCOTUS says you deserve an attorney, and it's up to the local court to decide if you're poor enough to merit the expense of a public defender.

      In any case, I have a hard time believing that a poor kid, whose computer and internet access exist only through the largess of others, and is suddenly facing a several-thousand-dollar-fee from a big and mighty conglomerate, won't be able to convince a judge to point to a lawyer and say "help this kid out."

      (Of course, if you don't believe me, find time to speak to your next elected judge when they're running for office and ask them. Or call up your state's bar association. Or pay a lawyer for an authoritative statement of the law -- although that lawyer will probably point out that, all else being equal, you get a better lawyer if he's not working for you because the court told him to. Whatever you do, don't trust random people on the internet, or online legislative compendiums, for legal advice.)
  19. I disagree by JemVai777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While Jack was quite the luddite in his waning years, he was instrumental in replacing the movie industry's repressive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production_Code">Hays Code [no sex, nudity, excessive violence, etc.] with the less-evil MPAA classification system. He also opposed the "clean DVD" proposal which would've seen sanitised versions of films -- a dangerous idea, if there ever was one.

    Not all of us are pure evil, and Jack has to be applauded for moving the industry in the right direction. I only hope his successor is a forward-thinking visionary.

    --
    "The problem with our economy is that our budget is balanced by people who aren't" - A.E.N.
    1. Re:I disagree by eln · · Score: 1

      The Production Code was indeed evil, but the current ratings system is just as evil. While the current system does not actually prohibit certain types of movies from being made, it is far more insidious in that it will effectively bury movies based on arbitrary and secret criteria enforced by an anonymous group of people. The appeals board is staffed by agents of the largest movie studios. The whole thing is a travesty.

      A functional ratings board that worked transparently would have been good. The secretive cabal Valenti put in place is not.

    2. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Watch This Film Has Not Yet Been Rated. All he did it allow the "code" to survive and thrive in modern times. He is evil, he professionaly fascilitated evil, and spent a lifetime lying for money. He's the worst kind of whore and pimp. He stole and resold the freedom of Johns and artists. His friends, cohorts and children should be fucked to death by robots, donkeys, or donkey robots as they watch his corpse burn.

      When your asking yourself why some scene was on the unrated DVD but not the theatrical release, remember the ones with the final say on NC-17, R, or PG-13 ratings are the buyers or vice presidents of the major theater chains as clergy, but only the correct faiths, muslims and other adherants to false Gods need not apply, look on. Valenti is a miserable son of a bitch, and I hope there is a hell, because it would take Valenti to make it a place suitable for Cheney's arrival.

    3. Re:I disagree by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That's not actually true. Any film can be recut and resubmitted after rating, so films aren't "buried" so much as altered (to avoid an NC-17 or to bump it up from a G). Also, though no hard and fast rules are published, it isn't difficult to predict a film's rating based upon its content by extrapolating from the ratings of other films. For instance, frontal nudity usually merits an R (Titanic is a counterexample, it got a PG-13), using the word "fuck" once, in an exclamatory way, merits a PG-13 whereas anything more merits an R, and so forth.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    4. Re:I disagree by LazloTheDog · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The man lived a very interesting life that went far beyond the narrow focused, knee jerk scope of most Slashdoters. An appraisal of that life can be found at:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/27/movies/27valenti .html?hp/

      JM

      --
      Oink, Oink!!
    5. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lie. At least in your case it comes from ignorance. You simply believe the MPAA's PR. Which itself is a complete fabrication. The buyers and VPs of the major theater chains are the ones who set the ratings. They're the appeal. The movie industry itself runs the 1st round of ratings through essentially a sive of stooges who rate how their told to rate. Which means gratuitious sex isn't what gets cut, but stories of intamacy. Want to get your film slapped with and NC-17? Don't just have sex. Because if you have shots that Mr. Skin would appreciate it'll only get and R, unless you're actually making porn. But if you're a small film maker, and instead of body worshiping you have a tight shot on the actors faces, particularly in a gay sex scene, that's when you get the NC-17. Given that MPAA is so pro gratuitious violence, it really shouldn't be a surprise that their pro gratuitious sex. Just not so much that it's too gratuitious to piss off the clergy party to the ratings, Christian only please. Those are the facts.

      You know what else almost got a too stringent rating? Gunner Palace. God forbid soldier cuss while being shot at. No matter what happened in Gunner Palace it should have been rated G, in fact people should have been dragged into the theaters and made to see it. Why do I bring it up? It's the only known example of the MPAA's Ratings board functioning at least partially. The MPAA exists to make sure companies like GE maintain media dominance. Anyone involved with them should experience the consequences of the dark side of the human condition they so enthusiatically perpetuate, and you so readily defend. Cowards and tyrants deserve a world without mercy and compassion. Failing that, at least such an end. Such effective censorship would be unthinkable and was unknown just a few decades ago.

    6. Re:I disagree by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes - now instead if you see nudity in a Hollywood movie you know it will be followed by excessive violence. What a way to screw up a generation.

    7. Re:I disagree by kid_wonder · · Score: 1

      I applaud your use of the "less-evil" description of his system.

      I'm not sure how long that has been in place, but don't you think he should have moved it a little further ahead himself?

      --

      "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
    8. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason he did that can be summed up in one word: profits. Sex sells, nudity sells, excessive violence allows for no-thought money making films to be produced on a regular basis. The "more freedom" side effect was probably the most unpleasant part he had to live with, and by his record I'd bet he'd have much preferred a more restrictive way of producing greater profits.

    9. Re:I disagree by nugneant · · Score: 1

      You should read the writings of Lloyd Kaufman on the subject. He's the guy behind Troma Studios, and he does a much better job explaining why the ratings system which gives Terminator 2 a PG-13 rating and Bloodsucking Freaks an "X" is terminally fucked than I ever could.

    10. Re:I disagree by hughk · · Score: 1

      According to This film is not yet rated, many of the MPAA's panel members are busy protecting children that they do not have. The MPAA tend to give members preferential treatment, making it much more difficult for independents and they tend to be arbitrary and unaccountable. Whether or not all the accusations made are true, it certainly seems easier to distribute a violent gorefest than a film depicting normal human activity. Lack of an MPAA certification doesn't totally prevent circulation, but it does restrict it considerably.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    11. Re:I disagree by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He also opposed the "clean DVD" proposal which would've seen sanitised versions of films -- a dangerous idea, if there ever was one.
      If you are refering to Clearplay and the variations on that theme from other companies then you don't really know what you are talking about. Ultimately all of these censoring systems are about the people who buy a DVD being able to watch it in whatever fashion they feel like. Valenti was entirely consistent in his anti-consumer approach with his attempts to kill off Clearplay,et al -- extending corporate ownership of culture from the store shelves to within people's living rooms.

      I'm pretty sure that my anti-censorship views are more extreme than yours, but what people do in the privacy of their own home with the products they have purchased is their own business and hollywood should have no say in it - technicalities of copyright law not withstanding.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  20. Hey, there, ladies and gents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know this man wasn't exactly our mascot, but can we please not celebrate the death of another human being?

    I'm not asking for a moment of silence or anything. I'm just saying that the man deserves some dignity. He was misguided, at least, but he was a human being.

    1. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      says who?

    2. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No. He wasn't merely misguided ... he was a never-to-be-sufficiently damned CROOK, a self-righteous, self-serving bloodsucker who deserves no respect whatsoever.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm not asking for a moment of silence or anything. I'm just saying that the man deserves some dignity. He was misguided, at least, but he was a human being.

      I disagree. Don't take the following as morally equating this man to monsters, but being a human being doesn't necessarily earn someone dignity. I wouldn't expect or ask anybody (except admirers...) to give Phelps or bin Laden dignity upon news of their deaths.

    4. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equating Jack Valenti with Bin Laden is a bit of a stretch, sir.

    5. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      He was a man and now he's dead, so what ? Everyones going to die, hundreds of thousands of other people also died today - it's something which happens quite a lot.

      Personally I couldn't have cared less about Mr Valenti when he was alive and I certainly don't care for him now he's not. If other people didn't like what he did or what he stood for when he was alive the fact he's now dead probably isn't going to do anything to change what he's already done and what peoples opinions of him are based on.

      The worship of people who happen to have been famous and then die is quite annoying, for instance Princess Diana was an annoying, snivelling non entity when she was alive but you would probably have stood a good chance of getting a beating off some star struck nutcase if you had pointed that out on the day she died even though the only difference then was that she was a dead, annoying, snivelling, non entity.

    6. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by lxs · · Score: 1

      Let's judge him in death like we judged him in life: As an arrogant greedy prick. To do anything less would be true hypocrisy.

    7. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he would have compared Valenti with some drunk who lived next door and beat his wife.. but you wouldn't have known who that was.

      His point is valid though... not all human life is sacred. Not everyone deserves respect in death.

    8. Re:Hey, there, ladies and gents by ponzio · · Score: 1

      He gave up whatever human dignity he may have deserved when he became the Joseph McCarthy of our era - subjecting law-abiding AMERICAN citizens to a torch-lit witch hunt. Get bent, hippie.

  21. Darth Vader tossed the Emperor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Valenti WAS the Emperor.

  22. .torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    .torrent?

  23. Rest in Hell, Jack by Rupan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll be sending your wife and children burned copies of my DVD collection to include in your casket. May you be infuriated by them for eternity.

    --
    Ads? What ads?
    1. Re:Rest in Hell, Jack by plover · · Score: 2, Funny
      As long as they're all MPAA-certified-genuine DVDs, his body will be at peace because you already paid for them.

      Now, if you were to send him copies of your movies, or better yet, copies of your friends' movies, we might want to attach magnets to his body, mount coils in the coffin, and use the spinning to generate enough electricity to power The Pirate Bay for the next year.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Rest in Hell, Jack by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      only problem is: burned copies (or even regular pressed copies) FALL APART in a generation or even less.

      one could say that he and his 'beloved media' (the copy-protected dvd) could rot together. one _could_ say that. I didn't, however.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Rest in Hell, Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in hell everything is burnt.

    4. Re:Rest in Hell, Jack by jimicus · · Score: 1

      and use the spinning to generate enough electricity to power The Pirate Bay for the next year.

      If you used the spinning to power the Pirate Bay, I suspect it would get so fast that you could power most of Sweden.

    5. Re:Rest in Hell, Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be sending your wife and children burned copies of my DVD collection to include in your casket. May you be infuriated by them for eternity.

      Maybe the MPAA should have made a backup of Jack? Or I guess they could just buy another one.

  24. Corrected link by JemVai777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    "The problem with our economy is that our budget is balanced by people who aren't" - A.E.N.
  25. Even though by Brian+Cohen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though he lobbied for the the DMCA and is a proponent of DRM, he did however start the rating system which replaced the much more militant Hays Code, allowing movies to be less censored.

    1. Re:Even though by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sadly the new system results in ugly censorship too. That is what you get when there is a monopoly like the movie industry. One arm is the ratings board, telling you what their other arm, the movie theatres and DVD stores will carry. Independents get harsher ratings which makes Walmart and the likes not carry them in some cases. The ratings board is secret (only in the USA, other rating systems in the world, something like 20 that were studied for comparison don't hide the raters). There are no standards by which the ratings board works, appeal is done in-house and is merely a formality. Jack Valenti was shown to be personally managing the ratings board, the whole ugly mess is his brainchild. It is a form of less inconvenient and public censorship. There is nothing to be hailed about it.

      For further information please watch the documentary "This film is not yet rated".

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:Even though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you get a chance, rent "This Movie is not yet Rated".

      Perhaps its the lesser of two evils, but the current ratings system is still pretty awful.

      Unless you own one of the major studios...then its great.

    3. Re:Even though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But ask yourself, was it done for the viewers or to sell more tickets?

    4. Re:Even though by Joelfabulous · · Score: 1

      I saw that documentary (This Film is Not Yet Rated) and didn't find it to be very insightful at all. Essentially, it took movies that were considered NC-17 and compared them to R movies (for the most part), saying that "Oh, this director got away with this, so why couldn't we? It's because we were indie / poor / unfamiliar / not a guaranteed money making success." What good points were made were more or less swallowed up by the skew. A lot of the examples that were cited in favour of a more lax rating system could have actually gone the other way... ending up classified as NC-17. So yes, the film had a point, but it was pretty fallacious at best. My favourite irony was seeing an actual rating (in Canada) on the back of the retail box at the local rental shop. So much for the director's axiom that "this film will never be rated" or whatever it was he claimed. (And no, I don't know how that works with exporting content, so if I'm wrong, I apologize in advance. I just found that to be quite humorous.)

      I think the prime reason we have this sort of system has a lot to do with a society where we don't want to take responsibility. I'll go out on a limb here and assume that the whole reason for the rating system is why we have the tag "thinkofthechildren." It makes things easier for parents, should they wish to actually take the responsibility to raise their kids right. If you *have* raised your children properly, then seeing nudity and relatively graphic sex probably won't totally scar them. A good deal of parenting has to do with not only controlling what age-appropriate (your mileage may vary) content your children are exposed to, but more with the ability of the child to think critically, and be responsible.

      Responsibility breeds responsibility. Who would've thunk it?

      --
      Sometimes I wonder if I think too much.
  26. ...wrong Jack died by Mewtwo · · Score: 1

    I just glanced over the topic title really quickly and saw "Jack" and "dead" and was really hoping that it was Jack Thompson.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 SU CK IT MP AA
    1. Re:...wrong Jack died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      And I thought it was about lonely necrophiliacs.

    2. Re:...wrong Jack died by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      he's next in the Jack "off" list :-)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:...wrong Jack died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hoped it was Bauer

    4. Re:...wrong Jack died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one is just as good. Err... bad?

  27. Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by shaitand · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you are a part of the RIAA and/or MPAA copyright regimes. Do you want to end like Hitler, Castro, or Valenti with large numbers of people celebrating your death? I don't mean in a HAHA way either. I wanted to be respectful and not to spit on the graves of the dead but I couldn't help but smile when I saw this headline.

    1. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Actually, I'm a bit appalled at the complete lack of respect I am seeing in these comments! Are you all 12 year olds? Please! Comparing him to DICTATORS who are responsible for millions of people's death? C'mon.

      Grow up. Give the man some respect. He was a person.

      Assholes.

    2. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm always looking for a good reason to open a bottle of beer, and thanks to Slashdot, I can open two bottles of beer today! Hip Hip Hooray!

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    3. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Give the man some respect.
      Why?

      He was a person.
      Some people have negative worth.
    4. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hitler was a person. Mussolini was a person. This is not to say that Jack Valenti is on par with Hitler, because he is not, but where do you want to draw the line between "go ahead and celebrate" and "mourn his death"?

    5. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      where do you want to draw the line between "go ahead and celebrate" and "mourn his death"?

      I'd say "murder" (mass or otherwise) is a pretty good line in the sand...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      exactly. respect has to be earned.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    7. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      A better comparison is with John of England, the chief reason for Robin Hood's legendary campaign. In a way, I wish Valenti could've pushed things to even greater extremes. When king, John was able to push his authority to such extremes that everyone revolted, and collectively drew up the Magna Carta which spelled out exactly some of the things the king was and was not allowed to do. The Magna Carta is perhaps the original document that later was among the inspirations for the US Constitution and the idea that a document of written rules could be the supreme law of a nation, above any president or king. If the MAFIAA had got its way every time, maybe it would've caused such a backlash that we'd now have an "Info Carta" and no more DMCA or forever-plus-one-day copyright terms. As it is, we'll have to hang out in the woods for some time yet.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    8. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      So, as long as I don't kill anyone, I can do anything else that I like and still be considered worthy of respect at my passing? Rape, steal, assault? Awesome.

    9. Re:Perhaps it is time to stop and think. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'The Magna Carta is perhaps the original document that later was among the inspirations for the US Constitution and the idea that a document of written rules could be the supreme law of a nation, above any president or king.'

      That reminds me of a time in my troubled youth when an attorney told me that in some cases our laws and their interpretation actually trace back to English common law and the magna carta when there is no other precedent. She said this is particularly true of the constitution.

  28. Can we be civil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we try to maintain a sense of perspective in the comments on this event? He might not have been the nicest man in the world, and he might have been misguided in many ways. But there is no excuse for reveling in his death.

    In the grand scheme of things, even horribly misguided and abused copyright law pales in significance next to issues of life and death.

    The world where everyone wishes death on everyone who has wronged them is an uncivilized and barbaric world that none of us truly would want to live in.

    Can we keep that in mind and can we try to maintain some civility about this man's death?

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Can we be civil? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      In an earlier time, Jack Valenti would have been a lord buying favours from the king.

      The people would have lived in fear of his insanity.

      Thankfully a knight might have challenged Jack and killed him in combat.

      In the modern world we just have to wait for old age (or scandel) and hope the next guy to pay off the powers that be will be less effective.

      Don't ruin the hope.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Can we be civil? by module0000 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're completely wrong AC. $$$ = life and death in this country. Wake up, move out of your parents house, and dream of enough $$$ to afford the net connection to talk to us, in the real world.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:Can we be civil? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      As someone else commented, he was an evil man. Yes not on par with Saddam, Hitler et al. but still evil. Why was the sight of people celebrating the death of a tyrant or a dictator a good thing vs celebrating the death of a man that was evil in a different way crass?

    4. Re:Can we be civil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only we could make such single combat challenges legal again.

  29. C'mon just give a little bile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not interested in what our reaction says about him. But more about what it says about us. Jack is beyond living with our words, but we're not.

  30. I'm so relieved! by nebenfun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was worried that the /. community would go overboard in their artificial hate for a man they never met or knew.
    I'm glad we save our energy to tackle real problems like world hunger, war, government encroachment, etc...

    1. Re:I'm so relieved! by plover · · Score: 1
      How about industry encroachment, or industry pushing the government into encroachment?

      Or does that spoil the sad sarcasm of your post?

      --
      John
    2. Re:I'm so relieved! by nebenfun · · Score: 1

      Well...that's a simple fix.

      If you don't like industry encroachment...then don't play along. Don't buy the products....don't consume the products(aka downloading movies, music, software etc...)
      Go towards other sources....If you don't like Microsoft, go to Apple....Don't like Apple? Go to Linux or *BSD.....
      Don't like the music industry? Go to the independents....Listen to free music....Learn to play an instrument.

      Industries, typically, only last as long as they have customers....(unions and farmers seem to be excluded from normal conditions...)
      Goverments last as long as they(the rulers) are breathing....It's much harder to destroy an industry(boycott) than goverment(revolution).

      My only point is that there are far worse men in the world than Jack Valenti.....The outrage seems overblown.

      Don't like the game? Don't play in the game.
      There is free music to enjoy/create. (I'm not sure about the independent movie industry.)

    3. Re:I'm so relieved! by plover · · Score: 1

      Well...that's a simple fix.

      If you don't like industry encroachment...then don't play along.

      Oh, were it that simple for someone like Patti Santangelo, the mother who was taken to court for acts of piracy that she wasn't committing, or Tanya Anderson,, the disabled mother who was unaware that her 10 year old daughter may have been downloading music, yet was dragged into court she couldn't afford for an old fashioned shakedown. As a matter of fact, just start looking at the cases on Recording Industry vs. People, and consider what kind of human would gleefully drive such an industry.

      It's easy to say all this "just say no" stuff, but only because you haven't been wrongly accused. Follow even a few of these cases, and Valenti stands out as a man so exceedingly greedy that he stands out at the head of a group of a thousand greedy labels. Dante reserved the eighth circle of hell for those guilty of deliberate, knowing evil, and Jack himself appears to qualify for Bolgia 8, where fraudulent advisors are encased in individual flames. Break out the marshmallows, Virgil.

      --
      John
    4. Re:I'm so relieved! by plover · · Score: 1
      Oops, I'm very sorry, I wrongly accused Jack of being the head of the wrong branch of the MAFIAA. He was the head of the MPAA, not the RIAA. Different group, slightly lesser evils. I think he'll only qualify for Bolgia 5, which is reserved for barrators.

      What I should have pointed out is that "don't play along" is harder to ignore when he was lobbying for you to pay a blank VCR tape tax, because you're a thief who is only going to record something copyrighted on it. He's the same guy who told this to the U.S. Senate: "I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone." Just in case you thought Slashdotters had the copyright on hyperbolic statements. And he helped shove lovely DRM down all our throats, so now my expensive HDTV set blanks out every few hours because of a hiccup in the HDCP stream coming from the cable company's official box.

      --
      John
    5. Re:I'm so relieved! by alienmole · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ironic that you should mention "government encroachment". If you don't think that the legal fiction of "intellectual property", as currently practiced throughout the western world, is a real problem for ordinary people, you haven't being paying attention.

    6. Re:I'm so relieved! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I was worried that the /. community would go overboard in their artificial hate for a man they never met or knew.

      I knew Jack. He was the fascist who helped steal the arts from the public. I don't need to have met the guy to know that the took something that belonged to me.

      I'm glad we save our energy to tackle real problems like world hunger, war, government encroachment, etc...

      I can't solve world hunger on Slashdot, but I can say that I'm glad that there's one less villain in the world.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:I'm so relieved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was worried that the /. community would go overboard in their artificial hate for a man they never met or knew.
      I'm glad we save our energy to tackle real problems like world hunger, war, government encroachment, etc...

      You pompous piece of shit -- if you're so fucking committed, get your complaining ass over to the Amnesty International website where it belongs. Are you just slumming on /. just to show how morally superior you are to us plebeians? Aren't you due down at your local food pantry instead of hanging around on a food fight like slashdot?

  31. An ode to Jack Valenti by Haiku+4+U · · Score: 1

    Jack Valenti, why
    so soon? Your apartment in
    hell must be ready.

  32. my voodoo curse worked like a charm. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    now selecting the next target ...

    1. Re:my voodoo curse worked like a charm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deer Sir.
      I am the sun of a Nigerian President in exhile. I ghave already got a list with over 1 million dollarsa^H^H^H^H^H^H^H names of potential targets. Plees send yore bank account number to me and the names will appear on your next bank state,ent.

  33. Let's not be disrespectful... by catbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A human being died. Show some compassion.

    Oh who am I kidding. He was an asshole.

    1. Re:Let's not be disrespectful... by durin · · Score: 1

      A human being died

      I believe that is still under debate...

      --
      Why, yes! I AM new here.
  34. Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by nebenfun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you seriously lumping Hitler, Castro and Valenti together?
    REALLY?

    Will the textbooks five hundred years from now speak of the great 20th century tyrants and mention Hitler, Stalin, Castro and Jack "PG-13" Valenti?

    How would that work? Hitler murdered his millions....Stalin murdered his tens of millions....Valenti was a tool of the MAFIAA....

    1. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      * but then again, there are plenty of slashdotters that would have you killed for believing in a god in any fashion.
      I know I shouldn't feed the troll, but I can't let that one pass. Do you actually know of a single case anywhere of a murder committed by an atheist because the victim believed in god?
    2. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you seriously lumping Hitler, Castro and Valenti together?
      REALLY?


      You're right, that's silly, Castro isn't even dead yet...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

      I know I shouldn't feed the troll, but I can't let that one pass. Do you actually know of a single case anywhere of a murder committed by an atheist because the victim believed in god?


      This MIGHT be one such case....

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassie_Bernall
    4. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Key word: "Might".

      I think it "might" just be a case of a deranged religious mother going off the deep end and doing her silly god-fearing best to turn her daughter into a blessed saint, with the help of some unhinged story-telling from a student no doubt eager to do a friendly favor for his bff (or whatever terms you want to dress it up in).

      Sorta like that vegetable girl up in Massachusetts.

      I also think that my "might-scenario" is mightier than yours. ;-)

      (I know you already knew this, hence your capslock bolded "might" - but I'm just summarizing for those who are too lazy to click the wiki link)

    5. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Are you seriously lumping Hitler, Castro and Valenti together?'

      Yes, they are all people whose passing is celebrated. In that respect it is valid to group them together, Hitler and Castro are well known examples of this point and therefore excellent examples. It would also be valid to say that he was male, like Hitler, Castro, Steve Austin, Sean Connery, and Myself. See how that works?

    6. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'You're right, that's silly, Castro isn't even dead yet...'

      No, but he still counts for this one because people celebrated his death. For a time people THOUGHT Castro was dead. The Cubans had parades here in Miami.

    7. Re:Perhaps it's time for YOU to think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His anus is though. Long live the plastic anus!

  35. Now let's be nice by sterno · · Score: 4, Funny

    The man's dead, show some respect. Let's have a moment of silence in his honor. Oh... wait, my moment of silence is actually encrypted using DRM that I lost the license key for. I'd reverse engineer it but I don't want to get in trouble...

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Now let's be nice by natrius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not only that, but since you're having this moment of silence in a public place, you'll be sued by John Cage for a public performance of 4'33" without his consent.

    2. Re:Now let's be nice by some+damn+guy · · Score: 1

      People show their respect in different ways.

      I for one am going to show mine by recording the service with a miniDV cam tucked under my coat and then selling copies alongside Chinese bootlegs of 'Norbit' out of the trunk of my car.

    3. Re:Now let's be nice by uhlume · · Score: 1

      I think "a moment" of a four minute and thirty-three second piece probably constitutes fair use in anyone's book. Just be sure your period of mourning doesn't extend much beyond thirty seconds, or you may find yourself on thin ice.

      Somehow I don't expect anyone will find this to be much of a problem.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    4. Re:Now let's be nice by dolmant_php · · Score: 1

      That would be difficult to pull off in a public place, since it is a three movement piece for piano, with instructions to lift and lower the keyguard at appropriate times. 4'33" of silence is not the piece.

    5. Re:Now let's be nice by Znork · · Score: 1

      On a more varied work, certainly. As the moment in this case encompasses the full contents of the work, a case could be made against it.

      On the other hand, it's even easier to argue that the work in question does not reach the 'work' height required for actual copyright any more than a space or a blank paper.

    6. Re:Now let's be nice by fellip_nectar · · Score: 1

      Psst. You can find all the silence you want for free on KaZaA...

      ...just do a search for 'Britney Spears' or 'Madonna'.

      --
      Worst. Signature. Ever.
    7. Re:Now let's be nice by uhlume · · Score: 1

      You're misinformed. None of the 273 seconds of the piece are intended to be identical, so no single moment could comprise "the full contents of the work". If you're going to be humorless and pedantic, at least be right.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    8. Re:Now let's be nice by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      http://archives.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/23/u k.silence/

      "LONDON, England -- A bizarre legal battle over a minute's silence in a recorded song has ended with a six-figure out-of-court settlement."

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    9. Re:Now let's be nice by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Yep, since this guy's been sued for recording it, you could be sued for performing it:

      http://archives.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/23/u k.silence/

      "LONDON, England -- A bizarre legal battle over a minute's silence in a recorded song has ended with a six-figure out-of-court settlement."

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    10. Re:Now let's be nice by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Then why did they sue this guy:

      http://archives.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/23/u k.silence/

      "LONDON, England -- A bizarre legal battle over a minute's silence in a recorded song has ended with a six-figure out-of-court settlement."

      I do like the quote, "Mine is a much better silent piece. I have been able to say in one minute what Cage could only say in four minutes and 33 seconds."

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    11. Re:Now let's be nice by Znork · · Score: 1

      While the listeners subjective experience as well as random external noise may certainly be part of the artistic interpretation of the piece, I seriously doubt they'd be considered part of the copyrightable work. Which is just yet another indication of the fallacies of copyright.

      Of course, if it did work, that could leave the door open to recording, for example, a jet engine, publishing them on a CD and then suing the airlines for copyright infringement. And, hey, why not try it and call the lawsuit itself avant-garde art?

    12. Re:Now let's be nice by alex4u2nv · · Score: 0

      I had a moment of silence while I was waiting for my torrent to connect.

  36. No, you're the ass-hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "During World War II, he was a pilot in the United States Army Air Corps, where he obtained the rank of lieutenant, flew 51 combat missions as the pilot-commander of a B-25 attack bomber and received four decorations."

    "Valenti accepted a new job in 2004 as president of Friends of the Global Fight, a non-profit organization dedicated to raising money for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria."

    Yeah, sounds like a complete ass-hat.
    Let's hope someone judges your life on one issue and one issue alone.
    Let alone an issue that relates to something as earth shattering as fucking entertainment.

    "put anyone working for the MPAA especially this guy as an evil bastard that need to die. "

    No, no one deserves to die. Not especially for something as trivial as what they are doing.
    But hey, go back to your little self-involved world where someone who disagrees with you on an issue deserves to die. Me, I'll be out in the real world where that shit doesn't matter. Go dance around your living room with your burned copy of whatever piece of trash DVD you want to watch claiming such a great victory for humanity; riding the world of such "evil" as you put it.

    But let it be known that YOU are the real problem. Yes, you. Using the word "evil" to describe something like this trivializes things that are truly evil, like your attitude, where entertainment is more valuable than someone's life.

    Fuck off.

    "Anyways, just my 2 cents."

    And that's just about what your comments are worth -- nothing.

    1. Re:No, you're the ass-hat by lordvalrole · · Score: 1

      LOL wow. ok

      First of all just because he was in ww2 doesn't make him great. There were tons of people who fought in ww2 and went up against all odds so please don't think that because he 51 combat missions means a god damn thing.

      The funding really has helped the effort to cure those diseases. Billions of dollars being wasted on drugs right now when the real problem is people need to stop having sex over there. Why the hell do these people think they can support 2-6 kids when they are poor? Disease and poverty would go way down if they would stop having as much kids. If that is harsh. too bad.

      Uh no one deserves to die is about the dumbest thing I have heard of. Of course people deserve to die. Just of matter of whom and why. Do you think Hitler should of lived? ya dumb ass. Think before you type.
      Innocent people like at Virginia Tech did not need to die. Those people were probably pretty damn good people and they got screwed by some wacko. There is a big difference buddy.

      And when I use the word evil. I mean just that. The people who put people through hell because they pirate or in fact some of them haven't even pirated stuff. I am sorry but when people start going after kids and people with cancer, you know what fuck them. They are worthless human beings that hold back society. I am sorry but the world is a lot more fucked up than you think it is.

    2. Re:No, you're the ass-hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Get the fuck off the high horse, and put that crack pipe down.

      No one stabbed this douche in the face for 85 years, I'd say that was a good long life.

      A life with which to propagate evil and murder countless innocent civilians from 30,000ft during the second world war.
      To devalue your rights and the very constitution upon which your country was founded.
      To rape the living shit out of you whenever you buy or watch a movie.

      Understand? Nah you wouldn't.

    3. Re:No, you're the ass-hat by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Let's hope someone judges your life on one issue and one issue alone.
      Yeah. Kinda like Stalin, who was really a good guy - don't judge him just on the purges.

      Using the word "evil" to describe something like this trivializes things that are truly evil, like your attitude, where entertainment is more valuable than someone's life.
      Way to trivialize what happened and show that you don't understand the issue. The issues around copyright and intellectual property are some of the worst abuses of corporations against individuals in modern civilization, which go far beyond entertainment. Valenti was guilty of exploiting a bad system for personal gain, and the gain of his cronies. Not only that, his history back to his work for Lyndon Johnson shows that he has always worked that way. This was a truly reprehensible man, and his reputation will reap what he sowed.
    4. Re:No, you're the ass-hat by Vr6dub · · Score: 1
      Not sure why I'm responding to this...Insightful? Hardly.

      murder countless innocent civilians from 30,000ft during the second world war.

      This really bugs me. It was a WORLD WAR. You could say the same thing about almost ALL of our fathers or grandfathers. Get off YOUR fucking high horse and stop acting like you wouldn't have ended up in the same situation if YOU "played" for any of the sides involved in WWII. Such hate and contempt is not healthy for you soul. I despise the guy but he is dead and all this rhetoric is nothing but mental masturbation. Are you going to fix something with all your vitrol?

  37. Good Riddance by stinerman · · Score: 0, Troll

    At times like these, I wish there was a hell so people like Jack Valenti could be sent to it.

    1. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he felt very strongly about copying. In support of his life's work, should we seek out and destroy any clones he might have had made?

  38. one down by jimboisbored · · Score: 1

    one down

  39. Hell is you in a small room by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Listening to an endless pirated loop of OAR for eternity.

  40. Time to buy a DVD burner by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I promised myself I wouldn't get a DVD player until Valenti was dead. My wife went out and bought one anyway (about the time he retired, fair enough) so I guess I should go buy a DVD burner instead to celebrate.

    I was planning to use up some of my mod points on this thread, but all the "piss on his grave" comments are already at +5. So much love for the man...

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  41. I LOVE JACK VALENTI ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because Jesus said to "love your enemies."

  42. You can't prove a negative by tepples · · Score: 1

    Prove that it hasn't happened.

    You can't prove a nonexistence except by exhaustion.

    Fag.

    Cigarette? What in the article linked the stroke that took Mr. Valenti's life to smoking?

    1. Re:You can't prove a negative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove that it hasn't happened.

      You can't prove a nonexistence except by exhaustion.
      Of course you can, by contradiction.
    2. Re:You can't prove a negative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, a contradiction wouldn't be proof that his argument is sound, just valid........... or is my logic off? (I belive in the context of the discussion we were looking for sound arguments, not just valid ones). (or perhaps you were joking and it flew over my head...........)

  43. twisted by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

    Right. Because making it illegal to copy a fucking movie is really worthy of hell.

    I mean, rapists, murderers, wife beaters, child abusers, people who don't let you watch movies... they're all the same.

    Sure, the guy was a douche, and I'll be first in line to agree he deserved a swift kick in the ass, but that doesn't equate to deserving eternal torment in hell.

    1. Re:twisted by xubu_caapn · · Score: 1

      Encroachment upon individuals rights is a far more sadistic crime (and clearly also a lot more subtle, seeing as you can't extrapolate what he's done for what it really means) than rape or murder. I understand that the imagery of rape or murder is a lot more frightening than not allowing people to "watch movies", but just think about the consequences.

      --
      FYI: I don't know what you guys are talking about half the time.
    2. Re:twisted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was a front page Slashdot post entitled "xubu_caapn, Dead," I would be the first person to chime in with "Ding, dong, the witch is dead"

    3. Re:twisted by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Well Dante puts him in the 8th circle of hell (fradulent) and the murderers and rapists in the 7th...

  44. Sorry, have to disagree by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying Happy Jack's death should be celebrated, but "he was misguided, at least, but he was a human being" isn't sufficient cause to not celebrate. There are some deaths that are simply good for humanity in general. Don't make me Godwin you to prove the point.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Sorry, have to disagree by plover · · Score: 1

      Hah. You're far too late. This thread was already Godwin'd after only 22 minutes and 30 posts.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Sorry, have to disagree by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      I think that's more of a comment on Jack than on my posting speed, don't you? ;^)

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    3. Re:Sorry, have to disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another human? Because he's a human that means we can't celebrate his death? Plenty of humans die everyday and there is no reason to miss them, we have plenty of assholes to spare sir. We can't look back on his life and say we'd have been better off without him? Screw this guy, screw your "come on everybody, he's a fellow human being" attitude. The guy was a total dick, a disgrace to the human race, an absolutely despicable character at the helm of an oppressive regime while it switched to warped drive and fucking crippled technology for the foreseeable future. I'd celebrate any "shot-callers" at the MPAA that die, they're selling out their species while lining their own pockets, they can offer nothing to neutralize the destructive force they represent. They're techno-poison, hellbent on controlling aspects of technology that shouldn't even concern them, and getting away with it. Making 'examples' out of random people in a pathetic act of fear, greed, and desperation. They all deserve to step down or be remembered as scumbags. Fuck them all.

      Awesome, the word in the verification image to post this is "condemn"

  45. Too bad by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    ...you decided to go AC on that one. It's probably the funniest post in this thread. Bravo, sir. I'm still wiping away tears.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  46. C'mon-sliders. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Sometimes /. comments manage to give me the creeps..."

    Creeps me out too, but not for the same reason it does you. Take a note of all the "ding dong" comments and add up the moderation then think "there's more like them out there". A lot are in postions of trust of some kind of resource (paperclips?), or they're going to grow up and become adults in the same position. Worried? Some are going or already have children and they're going to be taught the same ways as their parents. Worried more? Throw in a society that has thrown away any boundaries because they all come from some "magic" guy and it gets worse. Slashdot is just the tip of a very large iceberg and it's not melting.

  47. Ultimately... by jd · · Score: 1
    ...Valenti is dead and therefore doesn't give a damn about what we think. In his final days, if he ever thought about those who wanted the right to view the movies they bought in the manner of their choosing, he probably smiled at the fact that his view was the enforced view, worldwide, to the very day he died. Or maybe laughed at the fact that those who protest nonetheless fund the very machinery they protest so much about.

    In the end, hate is nothing more than a few chemicals swirling around in a brain. It has no meaning, it has no value, and most people who are in any way successful will have plenty of people who hate them. So will many who will never know success at all. Hate is commonplace.

    What he had was money, power and influence - three things far more valuable than any mere emotion, and three things that protesters at the MPAA's excesses are unlikely to achieve to anything like the same degree.

    I detest what this one man did, I detest what he stood for, but there's no use denying the fact that his was a story of success on a grandiose scale and that many people will try to emulate him for that very reason.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  48. Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by aibrahim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish his family solace at this time.

    Speaking to those of you who have expressed distasteful feelings here, try to remember that there is such a thing as "winning gracefully," "being a good sport" or whatever you wish to call it.

    I don't like Valenti on the balance. He did some good things, but his last actions in life were, in my opinion, bad. This isn't the time to debate them.

    One of the great measures of a person throughout our history is how they treat their fallen enemies. Take care how you treat yours now. Don't debase yourself, the community or "the cause" with your immature comments.

    --

    Don't post innacurate information
    If you do, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you.
    1. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack sins cannot be pardoned in this life, nor in the afterlife.

    2. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually goes both ways....how we treat the fallen and we are treated when we fall both say volumes about us (e.g. Saladin & Richard or Leonidas' body being returned to the Spartans years later). I hate to see people treat Jack with vicious hatred because it says things about them that are less than kind but it's pretty obvious that his actions late in life brought much of this on himself. When we treat others with respect and honor we are honored and respected even by our enemies when we don't we bring disdain and hatred on ourselves. Jack never learned or never cared about this. I hope others do and figure out that doing what's right is more important than pandering and whoring for money.

    3. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I have no mod points to contribute, but sir, well said.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    4. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by chee1a1a · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points, so I could mod this up. It's good to see a rational, respectful, and insightful response, even in the midst of the juvenile and disgusting reactions thus far. My faith in humanity is restored, a bit. It'll doubtless be ruined as soon as I continue reading. I'm wondering why so few slashdotters have a sense of decency and respect for human life.

    5. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he had no sense of decency or respect for the lives of those ruined (and still living) by undeserved legal action.

      Live as an asshole without remorse, die as an asshole without respect.

    6. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit. how many people posting actually KNEW him (as a person, not a press release)? huh? probably not many.

      i think it's insulting to the people who actually did care about him (as a person, grandpa, whatever), like family, friends, etc, when people on some nerd message board sit there and say "Have some decency. He may have been an asshole, but he was human.", when they don't really give a shit at all.

      it's like those newscasters when some tragedy happens, and they're all "How do you feel?" to the victims when they really don't give a fuck at all. there's something especially irritating about fake sympathy.

      i think it's the fact that the people who are sympathizing aren't doing it for the people who are really hurt, they're doing it for themselves. they don't actually care what happened or who's hurt, they only want to make sure it's known that they care. what bullshit.

      just like with the newscasters in the virginia tech thing. first, talking to the students its all, "what a tragic situation. you survivors are heros". then, after commercial, they show a fucking MONTOGE of the person who did the killing! they don't even have the decency to be honest and say "you know what, we don't really care. we're just here to report the news, and we're reporting this because people will watch, and we'll make money."

      that shit is severly condescending.

    7. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I totally agree with the sentiment that Valenti's family deserves respect, and should be allowed to mourn.

      But that having been said, we're not talking about a "fallen enemy." He never lost. Valenti pretty much won the vision that he had. And that vision included heavy lobbying for the eggregious provisions of the DMCA, which to this day put people in jail for things that otherwise are defined as their right to do. Leaders still lionize him.

      He instituted the hollywood ratings system, true, but he also ensured that the body was the most secrative and uncontestable organization inside the US. He also ensured that the people within that body followed his viewpoint about the world, and that it basically carried the weight of law, and as such became the most censurious organization in America. One could argue that, more than any other single individual, he's the reason why you can blow someone's head off in an R rated movie, but you can't show a woman touching herself through her clothes... Why violence is A.O.K. but physical intimacy is just wrong.

      "I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone." When asked about using 4 second clips in a home movie project, he replied "There's no fair use to take something that doesn't belong to you."

      And people really do go to jail over this stuff. We're talking about someone whose paranoia and lack of knowledge led to unbased responses which are now routinely taking chunks of people's lives away. And even before he was responsible for the death of real security research in the US, he was already the father of modern censorship here. Let's not forget his help in selling the Vietnam War to the population.

      This is the perfect time to debate his actions. This is the only time to debate his actions. What is the measure of a man? Here was a man who repeatedly prioritized business over freedom. And while he may have had his own reasons for doing so, this is not the sort of thing we should be pointing to our children and saying "be like that."

      There is, by and large, no such thing as evil people. Jack was not an evil person. But he did many, many bad things with the combination of misdirected intentions and personal charisma. And now, with the US forcing other countries to synchronize with our draconian copyright laws, his legacy will belong to the world too. This is the perfect time to acknowledge that good people do bad things, and frequently the people whom you would define as the best people have the power to do the worst things. Also, this is the perfect time to reflect upon how our modern culture is owned by large corporations in a similar fashion to how midevil culture was owned by the church. If we're to prevent another mickey mouse copyright extension, now would be the time to harden our resolve.

      One may complain that we demonize the man because he took away something as trivial as movies. This is not true. We demonize the man because, for something as trivial as movies, he was willing to take away our freedom.

    8. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      One may complain that we demonize the man because he took away something as trivial as movies. This is not true. We demonize the man because, for something as trivial as movies, he was willing to take away our freedom.

      I blew my mod points by posting earlier in this thread but this is the best comment I've seen here. Honorary +5 Insightful and a mod parent up!
    9. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      One of the great measures of a person throughout our history is how they treat their fallen enemies.

      A great man once said happiness is "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."

    10. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Jack was not an evil person.

      He had a role in the coverup of the Kennedy assassination, and in the escalation of Vietnam. That alone qualifies one forever as "evil person."

      Sorry if that's offensive to his family. I would expect any reasonable family members to have estranged themselves from this evil man decades ago.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Jack Valenti was a fuckhead scumbag and I hope the idiocy that tainted his soul is never allowed to infect another human being for the rest of eternity.

      But he wasn't on the Grassy Knoll, and you sound like a loony.

    12. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >But he wasn't on the Grassy Knoll, and you sound like a loony.

      He was a guest in the parade where Kennedy died, riding in one of the cars in the motorcade.
      I never said he was on the Knoll. On the other hand, I was on the other side of the plaza (a few months old).

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    13. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by Surt · · Score: 1

      >But he wasn't on the Grassy Knoll, and you sound like a loony.

      He was a guest in the parade where Kennedy died, riding in one of the cars in the motorcade.
      I never said he was on the Knoll. On the other hand, I was on the other side of the plaza (a few months old). Man, that was risky. Now you have some conspiracy nut convinced that you were part of the team that fired the kill shots. Those people are unstable, and you never know what they'll do.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    14. Re:Valenti's family deserves simple courtesy by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Now you have some conspiracy nut convinced that you were part of the team that fired the kill shots.

      Yeah, I shot a death ray from my binky, right.

      Sorry; my mom worked for the AT&T division that did military commo, in the Dallas office. The office was closed for the parade, but the employees got to go to the building and watch the parade from the windows. The corner of the building is in the Zapruder film, but we are not.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  49. I made a promise.... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 0, Troll

    that someday I would piss on his grave. Someday I will keep it.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  50. Darth Valenti by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It wasn't until he got into politics that he turned evil, and after all, didn't we forgive Darth Vader at the end?

    "He's more politician than man now, twisted and evil ... "

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  51. LOL by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You have no clue how the system works. People DO NOT GET FREE ATTORNEYS FOR CIVIL SUITES.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you don't get an attorney, do you at least get a continental breakfast and a little mint on your pillow? Those civil suites sound like a total ripoff.

    2. Re:LOL by Baddas · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every other state doesn't have court-provided civil lawyers.

    3. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you fail.

      Attorneys are almost never provided free of charge for civil suits. Attorneys are ALWAYS provided free of charge for criminal cases. Please see the Fifth Amendment, etc.

      There are numerous non-profit organizations that attempt to fill this gap. For example, there is one in NYC called LSNY. One of my friends used to work there.

      I know this is slashdot, facts, etc, but you are wrong, and at least YOU will probably see this, even if nobody else does.

  52. Sad news ... Jack Valenti, dead at 85 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - asshole and excessively litigating prick Jack Valenti was found dead in his Washington mansion this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his approach to suing anything that moved, there's no denying his contributions to the fat wallet of MPAA members everywhere. Truly an American icon.

  53. Hope he and Sonny Bono . . . by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    . . . are roasting together in the ninth circle of Hell.

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    1. Re:Hope he and Sonny Bono . . . by Asmandeus · · Score: 1

      Actually, probably 4th circle or possibly 8th circle, Bolgia 7.

    2. Re:Hope he and Sonny Bono . . . by hughk · · Score: 1

      No, possibly miniaturised and squeezed between the laser-head and the DVD/CD blanks being written around the world.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  54. What! by Eric+Damron · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We don't have to celebrate his death..."

    Okay, that's it... You're out of the club!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  55. And in other news... by isotope23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    And in other news, Satan has relocated to Arizona. When asked to comment on the change of venue,
    he stated : "There's only enough room for one of us down there, and though I invented Lawyers this guy owns them all."

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    1. Re:And in other news... by gosand · · Score: 1
      And in other news, Satan has relocated to Arizona. When asked to comment on the change of venue, he stated : "There's only enough room for one of us down there, and though I invented Lawyers this guy owns them all."

      Thank goodness, we have enough of these a-wipes with their "Cornerstone" and Calvin-praying-at-the-foot-of-the-cross stickers on their cars. And Mormons. But then again, it's yet another Red voter.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  56. Okay, okay by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    I was always taught that if you didn't have anything good to say about the dead not to say anything....

    He's dead and that's good!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  57. This is a day I'll never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Happy World Intellectual Property Day! April 26th, a day to remember forever!

    For only the third time, the theme of the day is "Encouraging Creativity". Let's all show Jack how creative we can be.

    1. Re:This is a day I'll never forget! by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

      And that, Alanis, is ironic.

    2. Re:This is a day I'll never forget! by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

      What better proof that IP really does stimulate innovation!

    3. Re:This is a day I'll never forget! by J0nne · · Score: 1

      * 2001 - Creating the Future Today
      * 2002 - Encouraging Creativity
      * 2003 - Make Intellectual Property Your Business
      * 2004 - Encouraging Creativity
      * 2005 - Think, Imagine, Create
      * 2006 - It Starts With An Idea
      * 2007 - Encouraging Creativity

      Looks like they were real creative with their themes...
    4. Re:This is a day I'll never forget! by EricWright · · Score: 1

      (Score:6, Best. Post. Ever.)

    5. Re:This is a day I'll never forget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it certainly meets the criteria for one form of irony :)

      However, Alanis Morrisette's song has several situations which meet the criteria for dramatic or situational irony. The other situations can be considered ironic if one considers the limitations of song as a medium - meaning and situation is implicit rather than explicit, having more in common with poetry than prose. Add to that the limitations of song as a commercial medium (verse and chorus arrangement, length limitation (eg. the 3.5 minute radio song average), etc.) and you can see why all situations in her song are spelt out as much as you would have in other forms of creative media. It just means that you have to have a sense of empathy to grasp why the situation is ironic, rather than having it explicitly clarified with no need of thought.

      We don't even have to get into the whole descriptivism versus prescriptivism debate with changes in the meaning of irony over time.

      (Basically, just wanted to say that even though people still use it as a joke, to claim that her song doesn't portray irony or ironic situations shows an ignorance of the definition of irony, its forms, its changing meanings, and the way it is expressed in different types of creative output. Just because some obscure irish comedian used it for his comedy bit many years ago, doesn't mean you have to keep trumpeting the same line without thinking about it yourself :)

    6. Re:This is a day I'll never forget! by ari_j · · Score: 1

      The real irony in the song is that millions of people think that rain on your wedding day is ironic because Alanis wrote a song with the meta-irony of labeling non-ironic things as ironic, the way many people do. I won't get into the debate about evolution of language - the core concept of irony is what applies to Jack Valenti dying on World Intellectual Property Day, not the word used to denote it. For more discussion of the song's content and meaning, see its WIkipedia article. I'm just waiting for someone to sue Valenti's estate for copyright infringement to really put things over the edge. ;)

  58. hit the nail on the head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "this is the same place where the murder of millions for such high crimes as being of a particular religious sect* is equated with the damnable offence of wanting video games that are rated "m" to not be sold to minors (because that's censorship, you know, the reason the founding fathers took up arms?)"

    Exactly, and it mirrors to a larger extent where a portion of society is headed -- to the looney sections of the extremes; bored and stupid looking for a "problem" to solve.

    Everything becomes "evil", the same kind of "evil" as genocide, etc.
    Now you can no longer define what evil really is.
    Murder is no longer of consequence because "we can't watch our entertainment".

    Everything you want to do becomes a "right", as in a "constitutional right".
    Now you can no longer define what a right is.
    Your right to enjoy a DVD is now more/as important than my right to life.
    Your right not to be offended is now more/as important than my right to free speech.

    Have we become so bored / stupid that we must take these problems and fill them with such vile rhetoric so that we can placate our egos when we "solve" them?

    Stop it, damn it, just stop.

    1. Re:hit the nail on the head by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Equating Jack to the great monsters of the 20th century is simply a retort to those that claim he was simply a man. When in fact neither is true. He was not a monster that devoured lives nor was he simply a man that left people to grow and prosper of their own cognizance. In reality the man was a bastard, you think he shed some tear for the lawsuit victims that medical bills on top of legal fees, fuck no, he was a ruthless, conniving, greedy bastard, and people that know who he was by reputation or worse by having come under fire of his organization have every right to voice their opinions of this event. You said it best yourself:

      Your right not to be offended is now more/as important than my right to free speech.

      Now if you want some sappy whitewashed ass kissing watch CNN, a place where none of this man's crimes have been reported. If you want to know what "the people" think of this man and his actions, you stick with the Internet - the place where men like "Jack" are working very hard at gaining control over who gets to say what and what gets published. You my friend, don't know what freedom is when it is staring you in the face.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  59. Gee, can Slashdot withstand this? by curecollector · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, are there even enough available mod points floating around to tag 99% of the replies here as "Redundant"?

  60. Appropriate quote by s2jcpete · · Score: 1

    Funny that I ran into this quote today: In heaven all the interesting people are missing. - Friedrich Nietzsche

  61. Obligatory Mark Twain quote by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1

    "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it."

  62. good riddance by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

    Good riddance to bad rubbish

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  63. where do we send the card? by v1 · · Score: 1

    the thank-you card, I mean.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  64. I think I speak for all on the internet... by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 1

    ...when I say, "I just hope he died of ass cancer."

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
  65. No way... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    "...that had done more in his life for his beliefs than we can only hope to achieve."

    He believed in taking away our rights to enrich himself. I for one do not celebrate his life. Someday I will find his grave and piss on it. I'll take toilet paper too, just in case...

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:No way... by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      "He believed in taking away our rights to enrich himself. I for one do not celebrate his life. Someday I will find his grave and piss on it. I'll take toilet paper too, just in case..."

      Very good, he did what he did for a reason and it sounds like you have a cause. We need more people who are passionate about IP laws and friendom of information. JV was not an evil guy (I knew one of his kids), but he was misdirected.

      Thank you.

  66. MOD PARENT UP by porcupine8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I haven no points, or I would.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  67. Slashdot editors do edit! by saforrest · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm the submitter of this article. In an effort to bend over backwards to be fair to Valenti, I included a link to the MPAA's own obit of him, as well as an interview where he talked about working to implement Lyndon Johnson's civil rights program.

    I see both these links were removed. Did that really need to happen? Yes, we all hate Valenti, etc., etc., etc. Does this article really need to be nothing other than a collective bitchfest? The man was a big fat jerk, but do we really need to talk about nothing more than that?

    In that case, here is Lord Byron's poem on Lord Castlereagh:

    Posterity will ne'er survey
    a Nobler grave than this:
    Here lie the bones of Castlereagh:
    Stop, traveller, and piss !
    1. Re:Slashdot editors do edit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was scum, nothing less. Today is a good day. Today evil died. Today is a good day to celebrate. DING DONG THE WICH IS DEAD!

    2. Re:Slashdot editors do edit! by goldspider · · Score: 1

      I think Jews expressed more compassion when Hitler died. Many of the comments here demonstrate a serious need for some perspective, letn alone human decency.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  68. He did his duty at the time. by twitter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    he was at one time a valuable member of the human race, and flew 51 combat missions as the pilot of a B-25 during WWII.

    He did his duty and that is admirable, but his record for oppressing others afterwards leads me to believe that his choice of sides was an accident of birth. Good and evil involve more than bravery and sacrifice.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:He did his duty at the time. by npsimons · · Score: 1

      He did his duty and that is admirable, but his record for oppressing others afterwards leads me to believe that his choice of sides was an accident of birth. Good and evil involve more than bravery and sacrifice.

      People change, people aren't perfect, and much as we like to deny it, most people are very heavily influenced by their environment. Sometimes people get ideas stuck in their head, and no matter how wrong the idea is, it persists for the reason that humans aren't perfect. Valenti may have just fallen in with the wrong people after his service; he may have been raised by parents who chided him for "stealing ideas", etc. Not to say that I don't hold people accountable for their actions; just that things aren't always that simple.


      Another thing to note is that not everyone is completely good, or completely bad. Even Mother Theresa had a cruel streak. This absolutism you attribute to him also scares me, as it shows a genuine lack of compassion and understanding for your fellow man.


      I salute Jack Valenti for putting himself in danger to try to protect others; I also respectfully disagree with his views on copyright and wish that he had seen the light and used his power to advance freedom and progress, instead of subverting our government to achieve his own material ends.

  69. To paraphrase Shepherd Book by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    May he go to that special hell reserved for child molesters and people that talk at the theater...stocked with a shiny new Blu-Ray player and a stack of Sony discs that just won't play.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:To paraphrase Shepherd Book by Mybrid · · Score: 1
      Shiny!

      "I never did credit the Alliance with an over abundance of brains, and if you're the best they got." -Malcom Reynolds
      Whether its Jack Valenti or George Bush, one does have to wonder how the powers that be in the Allinance, "the best they got", ever "got" to begin with and just where are the Malcom Reynolds of the future at anyway? We definitely need some Brown Coats to kick someone's booty and be BDH. Were there Monkeys? Remember that line in "The Train Job"? I think the monkeys of Oz escaped and now they are running this country and the MPAA for sure.
  70. Motorcade survivor by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Of all the people who were part of the Kennedy motorcade, few if any derived more influence and power afterward, than Jack Valenti.
    He had an amazing, long life and career, and had a vast influence on the media in the US and the world. I wish I could say I was as sad to see him go as Bob McNamara. Only Henry Kissinger remains, among men for whom I have equal esteem.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Motorcade survivor by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Only Henry Kissinger remains, among men for whom I have equal esteem.

      That's a bit of a low blow - it's not as if Jack Valenti took bribes from Indonesia for the US forces to look the other way. You may have hated the man but comparing him to one of Nixon's crooks like Kissenger is not fair.

    2. Re:Motorcade survivor by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Yeah. He only helped with weaseling us into Vietnam. That's nowhere near as bad as being one of Nixon's crooks.

  71. Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at how despised this man was.

    Lets start the countdown for GW Bush to sing his praises.

  72. Ugh, talk about MAFIAA by twitter · · Score: 1

    better the enemy you know, than the unknown that will rise to take his place.

    Still afraid of the dark, are we? Tacitus derided this attitude 1900 years ago. Your imagination should lead you to do things, not cower in fear.

    Do you think they could have picked a creepier picture of him? I mean, most people have to work hard to look like this.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Ugh, talk about MAFIAA by paganizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tacitus? that punk? I tell you, nothing and no one good EVER came out of Gallia Narbonensis.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  73. I know it's cruel... by GFree · · Score: 1

    "I say we take off, nuke the coffin from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

  74. out of touch by nanosquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks like in the early days of his MPAA presidency, he was fairly reasonable (as reasonable as anybody can be in that job). But he seems to have had a complete inability to comprehend and deal with the realities of 21st century technology. He should probably have stepped down from that job 20 years ago. The fact that the MPAA didn't make him step down 20 years ago tells you how troubled and outdated that organization is itself.

    1. Re:out of touch by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Jack Valenti reminds me of J Edgar Hoover. I'm sure he did do good in the early days, but power is a corrupting influence and the MPAA became nothing but a clique under his control. While he has retired I bet he still had a great deal of influence over its current shape, even if by appointing the people who still work there. Hopefully his demise will bring sweeping changes, just like in the FBI. Sweep away years of secrecy (and corruption?) and start afresh.

      The British film board (the BBFC) might demonstrate a good model of how to reform the MPAA.

  75. Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by ToastyKen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, in recent years, I had been feeling that the quality of discourse on /. has been going up. People usually have been taking things in perspective, even when the topic is Microsoft.

    But now there are suggestions of celebrating a person's DEATH, and desecrating his grave, just because he didn't want you to watch some movies for free. Now, I'm a big advocate of copyright reform--I even donate to the EFF--but to show such hatred that you're happy about the end of a human life? Just because you disagree with him about copyright law? Wow.

    Just, wow. Now there's the /. I've always known and loved! It's back, baby! :) :P

    1. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by LordKazan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, not "because he didn't want you to watch some movies for free". You're clearly ignorant on the entire subject of DRM, the DMCA, etc.

      It's because he participated in the wholesale theft of consumer rights that people are mad at him.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    2. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by ToastyKen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes yes, I fully understand the issues involved. AND I DISAGREE WITH HIM. I could quote you Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the Constitution. I'm all for treating copyrights as the temporary monopolies they were originally intended to be instead of everlasting rights. I feel queasy when I hear the term "intellectual property". A lawyer friend of mine has even asked me questions about the DMCA.

      Again, the point is that I disagree with him, but I certainly don't think the issues at stake are serious enough to CELEBRATE HIS DEATH over.

      The lack of compassion and respect for human life some people are showing here scares me far more than any lack of compassion for consumer rights the MPAA has shown. Hell, the closest thing I can think of is when one of the RIAA's targets died, and they went after their family. Even they called that off after public uproar.

      And even if they did want all copyright infringers dead, that's no reason to emulate such behavior.

      I respect fair use and consumer rights, but I respect human life even more.

      Now I remember why commenting on /. wore me out back in the day. :P

    3. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by LordKazan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think a lot of people here are incapable of feeling an ounce of respect for someone who did such much damage to their rights, and I cannot say that is an unreasonable feeling.

      He worked to undermine their rights (and succeeded) - why should they consider him anything other than vermin?

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    4. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because you disagree with him about copyright law? Wow.
      /.ers don't disagree with his personal views, we disagree with his actions... the things he did to corrupt copyright law in this country, ruining much of the entertainment industry as a whole.

      Sure, it's not as bad as murder, rape, etc., but taking significant steps towards destroying the whole system of "art" of every kind is a pretty damed-able offense, which easily overrides all else. I mean, we're not talking about murdering someone, just glad to see one going away, who made his money in the most cynical and destructive way possible.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But now there are suggestions of celebrating a person's DEATH, and desecrating his grave, just because he didn't want you to watch some movies for free. Now, I'm a big advocate of copyright reform--I even donate to the EFF--but to show such hatred that you're happy about the end of a human life? Just because you disagree with him about copyright law? Wow.

      Thank you Mommy Jesus, you sure are superior to all the rest of us! Now go huff some dick and make some nice happy compromises while the rest of us are busy not being phony assholes.
    6. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by gordo3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in the same way that new laws benefits some groups to the detriments of others(global warming regulations), he did his job. You may disagree with him, but to consider him vermin for taking a different stand than you on an issue(he isn't a public official, it isn't his job to try and do what will make the majority happy) is basically the mindset of dictators and mass murderers, not participants in a democracy.

      Your rights haven't been breached by him. what the law allows has changed. It happens all the time and some people are on the losing end.

    7. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Soporific · · Score: 1

      Does that mean I have to stop all the torrents I currently have in queue?

      ~S

    8. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      If you think in a purely material way, a representative of an evil part of society left this world. YAY!
      If you think in a christian way, his soul, deprived of all the goods he needlessly accumulated in this world, is now in the hand of a just judge. Maybe he's not going to hell forever, but: YAY!

      Of course you can be sad if you believe in reincarnation but it wasn't your point, I guess.

      As for me, if I could dance on his grave with creative commons licensed material, I'd do it. It shouldn't be that much of a sin. A kind of restoring some karma.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    9. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      to consider him vermin for taking a different stand than you on an issue(he isn't a public official, it isn't his job to try and do what will make the majority happy) is basically the mindset of dictators and mass murderers, not participants in a democracy He's not considered vermin for simply "taking a different stand", but for having an active role in screwing over the American people (and indirectly, the entire world). Disliking the man (and celebrating his eternal absence from our lives) has little comparison to a dictator or a mass murderer. I find your attempt to paint people who actually *wish* well for We The People as similar to dictators and mass murderers disgusting.

      Your stance, on the other hand, is patently sociopathic (and that's *not* hyperbolic vitriol, unlike your abject comparison of dictators and mass murderers). Just because his actions were entirely within the rules of the system, that does not mean his actions or his character are beyond reproach.

    10. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by jesdynf · · Score: 1

      He's actively conspired to hold back the intellectual progress of all mankind -- and I'm quite serious here. No, nobody's failing to invent a cure for cancer because of /Starsky and Hutch/, but he helped a lot of people make a fucking lot of money on this "I can own ideas" trash, and that IP crap is LIKE cancer -- don't believe me? Graph wordcount on IP legislation as a function of time.

      As for the "all mankind" charge -- what America thinks, everybody else has to live with.

      If there's a Hell, he's surely there.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    11. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You strike me as the sort of whiny sanctimonious P.C. moron who'd defend Hitler on grounds that he was a human too.

      Go hug a tree there, Pollyanna. I've got a date with Godwin.

    12. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by geoskd · · Score: 1

      The lack of compassion and respect for human life some people are showing here scares me far more than any lack of compassion for consumer rights the MPAA has shown. Hell, the closest thing I can think of is when one of the RIAA's targets died, and they went after their family. Even they called that off after public uproar.
      When weighed against the damage that Mr. Valenti has done to the american way of life, the value of one human life pales. Only a severely retarded person can stick to the claim that a single human life has that kind of value. I will even go so far as to stipulate that had Mr. Valenti not existed at all, our world would be a better place. I would bet you anything, that if you didn't know what he did for a living, and met him at a bar, you would have gotten along alright, but that doesn't justify or mitigate the EVIL this man has perpetrated through his chosen career. Remember, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Its not good enough to believe what you are doing is the right thing to do, you also have to be correct. Mr. Valenti was paid too much to care wether he was doing good or evil, and the greed blinded him to the damage he was doing. He was singlemindedly trying to maximize the value of the company he worked for, a job which when taken to its logical extremes is not only immoral, but illegal as well. He was the worst kind of leader. A man with a huge amount to gain by trodding roughshod over anyone in his path, and a man charismatic enough to convince others that the trampling was nesescary. I say again, the man was EVIL.

      -=Geoskd
      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    13. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      The lack of compassion and respect for human life some people are showing here scares me far more than any lack of compassion for consumer rights the MPAA has shown.

      When MPAA shows "lack of compassion", it ruins the lifes of countless number of people with fraudilent suits and by harming innovation in the digital media business.

      When Slashdotters show "lack of compassion", they trash some clueless guy, who, just like you, me, and any human on Earth, will die at some point. Death is not a license to rewrite history for the sake of "compassion". The guy did a lot of harm.

      Oh wait, thoughtcrime is just as bad as real crime, right.

    14. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by beej · · Score: 1

      I swear there was an article about this posted to Slashdot at one time or another. Guys like seeing people get what they deserve, remember.

    15. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by DogBotherer · · Score: 1

      Again, the point is that I disagree with him, but I certainly don't think the issues at stake are serious enough to CELEBRATE HIS DEATH over.

      Fairy nuff, but I'm not going to be the type of hypocrite that eulogises someone in death that they despised in life. It's not like he was ripped from life at a young age, he'd had more than the full innings and there was zero chance of redemption. The man was scum, he's dead, he remains scum. I, for one, am not sorry that he's gone.

    16. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am not sorry that he's gone. But do you welcome our new zombie Valenti overlord?

      Sorry. :-(
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    17. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by AdamKG · · Score: 1

      I was too young to care about DMCA, Sonny Bono, and DeCSS when they happened, so I missed Valenti's 'best' years.

      However, I do know that suggesting that people's dislike of him is about 'watching movies for free' or even about copyright law is disingenuous. This is about My freedoms as an American, freedoms that he cast aside as outdated and irrelevant.

      In the technological age, protected, free and anonymous speech and copyright law are mutually exclusive. If it had not been for Valenti, we may have done away with Copyright by now and embraced freedom; instead, because of him, it is unlikely we will ever do so.

      What is being said about him is obviously juvenile and distasteful. But at the end of the day - it's just juvenile and distateful. Valenti did things that are orders of magnitude more important - he made it the norm for the rights of the People to be cast aside when so convenient. That is not distasteful - that's disgusting.

      There are freedoms that I will never have once I turn 18. A century ago, the mere thought of infringing them would have been laughed off. Today, however, largely because of the efforts of Valenti and others, 'protecting' the 'investments' of studios is more important.

      That is my "Just, wow."

      --
      groupthink: It's good for self-esteem.
    18. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by red+crab · · Score: 1

      He died at 85. A natural death I presume. What's the fuss all about buddy?

    19. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Malfourmed · · Score: 1

      Bravo, ToastyKen.

    20. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Is there a limit to this? I mean Hitler, Stalin, Saddam and many others could each be described as 'a bit of a git'. But it's a damn shame they're dead right? World would be a much better place if they were still around.

      And as far as respect for life goes, you mention yourself, they go after people with no respect for the dead. They will ruin people who do not have the means to defend themselves. I think it's a perfectly reasonable response to give him some grief. In fact we should probably go for his family. Eye for an eye.

      Lets work out the total cost of their preposterous claims, including the unjust claims to families and associated legal, emotional and social costs. The cost to the taxpayer of clogging countless courts, businesses (all those letters), wasting time at all levels of government, costing fortunes in enforcing ridiculous laws, the cost to other countries that the US government feels fit to apply its laws to or face economic sanctions. The damage the actions of organisations like the MPAA and RIAA have done not just to the US legal system, but to citizens of the whole world is beyond comprehension. And so, in the same fashion as the ridiculous formula they use to persecute people, let's take that entire cost and go after this bastard's family.

      I reckon people saying a few nasty things on the Internet is a lot more respect than the man can reasonably expect.

    21. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Yes, but let's take a realistic look at this "screwing over" of the American people. He didn't want people to infringe upon the copyrights of the people who hired him to protect those rights. Specifically, he wanted people to not distribute movies.

      OH MY GOD THE EVIL!

      His methods were hamfisted because there were no good answers. There still are no good answers. That doesn't make him the devil. The hyperbole you advocates can summon to make your cause look even then tiniest bit worthwhile (and you guys really need it, because people do understand that paying for movies isn't really a problem) is astonishing.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    22. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by rlp · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Many of the posts show an appalling lack of civility (I know, "This is Slashdot!") and human empathy. My condolences to his family. As for the late Mr. Valenti - no comment.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    23. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the "voluntary" censorship.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    24. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah. fuck capitalism.

      "i wanna piss on your grave/make me feel alright" -the coup

    25. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by kiwimate · · Score: 1
      Agreed. People get things out of all proportion, and this is not just on Slashdot. Seriously...maybe it's because life, to me, is just so much fun. But more than that, it's the most precious thing you have. Take that away, and all the rest of it becomes moot. Sounds stupidly obvious, but apparently most people don't take any time to occasionally stop and reflect on that exact point.

      John Donne said:

      No man is an island, entire of itself...

      Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind...

      And so never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee


      (Apologies for misquoting; this is from memory because I'm too lazy to look it up.)
    26. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by cowscows · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely fair. Just because someone works in the private sector does not make them above criticism. Especially for someone in a postition like Valenti was in, where even though he wasn't a public official, he had plenty of influence over the actions that many public officials took.

      Where a man gets his paycheck is not the only characteristic that we should consider. In fact, it's a fairly minor one at best.

      Laws are not what dictates rights. That's supposed to be one of the fundamentals of the governmental system in this country. Laws that codify rights are merely stating what already existed. While in practice, it doesn't always work out easily, that doesn't mean that if a law takes away a right then you never deserved that right in the first place. It means that law is unjust, and steps need to be taken to try to repeal it. The fact that there are paths to challenge unfair laws does not mean that the people who supported those laws are free from any blame.

      The single most frustrating thing about Valenti and his ilk, beyond people involved in things like environmental groups and such, the RIAA/MPAA/etc. are trying to limit people's rights in order to protect a profit scheme. More than that, a profit scheme built on a scarcity that no longer exists. They're trying to hold back technology in order to keep making easy money. It's hard for me to support or respect that. While I'll acknowledge that not every anti-pollution lobbyist has the purest of motives, I can understand and appreciate the idea of protecting the environment, even if I don't agree on all the details. But I'm having a real hard time respecting someone who's crusade was so clearly motivated by protecting the profits of a bunch of old, uncreative business people.

      Being a participant in a democracy does not require me to be indifferent to the actions and words of others. There are plenty of bad people out there, and to call them on it does not make you a bad person as well. It certainly does not indicate the mindset of a murderer or a dictator.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    27. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      He lobbied for a law so wide ranging that it made it a criminal offense, as in jail time, for making an unauthorized DVD player, just because if someone's capable of making a DVD player, they're also capable of making something that could copy DVDs. And if someone can copy a DVD, they can also potentially distribute unauthorized copies. Something that was already illegal.

      The guy was at best a shortsighted raving lunatic.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he did his job

      Subtle but not subtle enough. Godwin's law is invoked, thread over.

      Your rights haven't been breached by him. what the law allows has changed. It happens all the time and some people are on the losing end.

      Okay, not that subtle then. It's scary if you believe that changing a law changes anyone's rights.
    29. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Elrac · · Score: 1

      This is a long and contentious thread full of trolls, but I won't let that stop me from adding my own 2c.

      I submit that celebrating a person's death by (e.g.) pissing on his grave, and doing so in as public a fashion possible, or at least inciting others to do so, is perfectly justifiable and a good thing to do for the good of society as a whole. Explanation:

      Anger is an ancient human emotion, and revenge an ancient societal mechanism. In a tribe of monkeys, if one steals food from the others, the others gang up on him and beat him up. Primitive? Sure. Effective? Hell yes. That monkey quickly learns to deal fairly with the other monkeys. Usually, he doesn't get killed before learning. Those of you who understand Darwin will understand what this is about: revenge is a form of behavior that is beneficial to the survaval of a species or it would not have entered and endured in the gene pool. Revenge keeps individuals from acting like assholes to the detriment of the group. Some people are honest and fair because of their high moral standard. Others are honest and fair because they're afraid of being beaten up. In other words, the expectation of revenge helps keep people from being assholes.

      Jack Valenti is dead, and good riddance to him. There are six billion humans alive, and most of them at least have not affected my life in a negative way like he has; so I dislike him more than billions of other humans. There are six billion people alive, and I don't mourn his passing. If I mourned people passing, I'd be a busy mourner indeed. That's the way the cookie crumbles: Life is shit and then you die. I fully believe that Jack is nothing more than worm fodder now, and is completely oblivious to the fact of people pissing on his grave. Whatever you do to Jack's corpse is in my view a victimless crime. His family? Fuck his family! Did they try to persuade him to not be a crummy bastard? If they've inherited his personality traits along with his wealth, then I hope they see people pissing on his grave, go crazy and commit suicide. Good riddance to bad genes.

      Bringing together the last two paragraphs: I encourage people to piss on Jack Valenti's grave, not because of Jack Valenti but because of all the assholes who are still alive. I want them to be aware that when they die, people will likely piss on their graves too if they continue to act as assholes. The judicial system has taken away almost all recourse against assholes, but I think we all should all use whatever means of revenge are available, even including posthumous revenge. It's our only chance to keep assholes from dominating the gene pool.

      --
      When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    30. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      I already know your opinion on the subject, but I personally see nothing wrong with celebrating the death of someone who has worked for many years to pay off and influence the government to take away my rights for no reason other than to guarantee profits.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    31. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      you're right. but to be happy that they die or wish bad things upon them for it makes you a bit disturbed. to wish it on someone who is supported a widely held belief in the US(yeah, lots of people dont believe in piracy or free and easy copying for any reason..) is really just wishing your opponents weren't there. that is a dangerous mentality because its your opponents in an argument that will show you more about who you are than anything else.

    32. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Doc+Lazarus · · Score: 1

      Valenti's death almost makes me wish there was a heaven, so when he gets there Kurt Vonnegut could punch him in the stomach. Repeatedly. And then make him read Cat's Cradle.

    33. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go sing kumbaya, shitcock.

    34. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was kind to his dog.

    35. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Look, the guy was a fascist, plain and simple. The US is a democracy. He was actively seeking to destroy our country. There is no other way to put it, and this "Well, you shouldn't hate him so much cus he only didn't want you to watch movies a certain way" is a straw man. He deserved to die, horribly --- too bad he lived as long as he did.

    36. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by sootman · · Score: 1

      First of all, yes, this is tragic*, blah blah blah. But you're missing a few things:
      - death is only sad to those close to the deceased. we all love Linux, but look at all the jokes about Hans R. a few months ago. Or the Challenger accident, or Chernobyl, or any other bad event in history.
      - it IS OK to make jokes about sad things. it's what we do. there is NOTHING so sacred that you can't have some fun with it. And it helps us deal--have you ever been to a funeral? Plenty of good jokes about dying and the dead. But mainly,
      - Jack was WRONG but he had the POWER to inflict his wrong thoughts on us and THAT'S why we all FUCKING HATE HIM. He was WRONG about the VCR--which turned out to be the single greatest BOON to the movie industry EVER--and he wrongly tried to keep digital technology down two decades later.

      Look at the history of refrigeration. Once upon a time, you kept things cold by paying people to bring ice from the North. Then refrigerators came along and the WORLD got INFINITELY better--forget food storage, what do you think the state of modern medicine would be without a way to keep things cold? But imagine there was a huge ice-industry lobby in place that said to the government "Oh, woe is us; please, government, impose artificial restrictions on the world to keep our shitty, outdated business model afloat forever!" We'd be paying MORE money and having a LOWER quality of life. Would that be a Good Thing?

      Basically, he fought against technology, and won, and continued to do so even after being proven 100% wrong (w.r.t VCRs), and that's why we--visitors to a tech-centric site--hate him. Now that he's dead, he can no longer do Bad Things, and we can dream of the day that more enlightened people will lead the MPAA. (Yes, I know, he didn't lead it as of a few years ago.) So yes, we're glad he's dead. A powerful figure of our opposition is gone. Yes, we're happy.

      If you want sympathy, go a "we want to make money forever because we recorded one good song once and we want to extend copyright into a zillion years in violation of what the framers intended and use technology to keep people from ever exercising their fair use rights" forum.

      * no, not really--he lived 85 years and had a pretty full life. Nothing tragic about that.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    37. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Surt · · Score: 1

      Public shame is one of the mechanisms by which society corrects egregious behavior in the long run. By speaking, loudly, that his family should be ashamed of him, particularly during publicly notable moments in the life cycle, such as death, we encourage both them and others not to pursue those paths, and make the world a better place for all.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    38. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you fully understood the issues involved, there would have been no need to strawman the viewpoint that opposes yours. Try again.

    39. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by jafac · · Score: 1

      I dunno.

      The guy said I was a criminal for getting up to go to the bathroom during a commercial break.
      (not to mention, his role in helping to cook-up the Gulf of Tonkin incident while he was Lyndon Johnson's aide)

      I fully, and wholeheartedly support grave desecration for this fascist thug.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    40. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      The Voice of Reason(TM) is not a welcome one here.

      I just wanted to say it was refreshing to read your comments. I was shocked at the blind hatred and vitriol being thrown about here. I'm all for "celebrating death" in the religious sense, that it leads to new life. However, I'm not one to dance on anyone's grave.

      Very often we here at /. rail against people like Jack Thompson, who paint us as that which we are not without even stopping to consider what we might be. I find it saddening that we are largely doing the same thing to Valenti. He's not even cold and we've celebrating, much as Thompson was already exploiting the VA Tech shooting within hours of it occurring.

      This isn't saying everything Valenti did was mete and right, but I don't think it is just of us to judge him so harshly.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    41. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by atamido · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's not as bad as murder, rape, etc.

      Maybe, but I'm not so sure. What is worse, someone being murdered, or the rights of hundreds of millions of people being removed for the sake of one corporation's profits? (Granted, had he murdered hundreds of millions of people, that would be worse.)

      A lot of people sacrificed everything they owned, including their lives to build a country full of good human rights. People that seek to remove those rights in the name of greed should have [fill in something bad] done to them. Jack Valenti was one of those people.

    42. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Bloomy · · Score: 1
      Yes, but let's take a realistic look at this "screwing over" of the American people. He didn't want people to infringe upon the copyrights of the people who hired him to protect those rights. Specifically, he wanted people to not distribute movies.

      What about the retroactive copyright extensions? How much money has been made by the various media conglomerates by works that were used or adapted from the public domain? They made use of the intellectual commons, made a lot of money and used some of it to lobby for laws that ensured they wouldn't have to give back. I have no problem paying for movies, books, music, etc., but the sense of entitlement they have to forever retain the rights to their works is, in my opinion, worse than any DRM model they can cook up.

    43. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I don't know that I've ever read a more thorough (or for that matter, any) review of the social implications of grave-pissing. Maybe I've been reading to much Slashdot, but I found it quite insightful. Thanks!

    44. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      If only I had Mod-Points I'd through you another Mod-Up

      I think this is a very good case of Shakespeare's quote:
      "The evil that men do lives after them;
      The good is oft interred with their bones;"
      (Julius Ceasar Act III Scene 2 - Antony's "Friends, Romans, Countrymen" speach)

      We all remember Jack Valenti for his work on pushing DRM/DMCA etc.

      Do we remember him for pushing for the Movie Rating system, which incidentally probably prevented Government Censorship of movies way back in the day?

      I can't say that I agreed with everything, heck even most of, what I know he worked on. But Movie Ratings is something that I can say was a very good thing.

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    45. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by rlp · · Score: 1

      > By speaking, loudly, that his family should be ashamed of him, particularly
      > during publicly notable moments in the life cycle, such as death, we encourage
      > both them and others not to pursue those paths, and make the world a better
      > place for all.

      I'm sure Fred Phelps would agree with you. I think there's a time and place
      for everything, and the time of a person's death is a time to leave their
      family, friends, and loved ones in peace.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    46. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by node+3 · · Score: 1

      His methods were hamfisted because there were no good answers. There still are no good answers. That doesn't make him the devil. Correct. Of course, no one called him the devil, but don't let that stop you from thoroughly decimating that straw man. He created a system of injustice. For that he's not some mythical being of pure evil, but he's definitely someone whose passing deserves to be greeted with a cheer. Not necessarily out of malice (although malice towards the man is understandable), but out of relief that at least now he can no longer act to make things worse.

      The hyperbole you advocates can summon to make your cause look even then tiniest bit worthwhile (and you guys really need it, because people do understand that paying for movies isn't really a problem) is astonishing. I want very much to pay for movies. I also want to be able to rip my DVD collection like I have my CD collection. If the content producers wish to make it technically difficult (via encryption), while I may not like it, I can accept their attempt. To make doing so a criminal, or even civil, offense, however, is where I draw the line. He, and others, have taken a legitimate business and turned it into a racket. RIAA and MPAA stories are tagged MAFIAA for a reason.
    47. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      And revolutions have also been bred into the gene pool as a survival mechanism.

      There's an order of escalation when it comes to that: soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. Use in that order.

      Right now we're somewhere between ballot box and jury box, as far as urgency is concerned. I implore people to act en masse now before we get to ammo box.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    48. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Man, this guy was a HUGE asshole. DRM and MPAA shenanigans aside (which enough to hate him, really), he was also the wing man of a guy (LBJ) who killed our rightfully elected leader (according to Howard Hunt, who was privy to the crime), and basically subverted the most powerful democracy in the world so that it is now completely beholden to a corporate media machine that is anti human both here and all over the planet.

      Seriously, his death came about 50 years late. I for one would not sully my piss on vermin like this, for fear of getting some of his slime anywhere near me.

      Don't protect people like this. They should have been hanged. All enemies of the constitution should be hanged, and these perpe-TRAITORS should have been first in line. It's a pity that vile scum like this even get to live to 40, much less the ripe old age this douche-bag made it to.

      I'm steaming mad this is a guy I'll never get to punch square in the face, because he's already fuckin' dead.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    49. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Heaven means getting punched in the stomach by Kurt Vonnegut? That's pretty hardcore.

    50. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      I'm sure Fred Phelps would agree with you.

      Maybe, maybe not. Did the original poster march over to Valenti's funeral and start protesting?

    51. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      I think this is a very good case of Shakespeare's quote: "The evil that men do lives after them;

      I'm pretty sure I heard that first in an Iron Maiden song: "The evil that men do lives on and on." From their Seventh Son of a Seventh Son album.

      Shakespeare ripped off a lot of people.

    52. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Oh, God, this man has been stymieing the creative output of Hollywood and muffling free speech for decades and you think we're mad at him for filing lawsuits against some file sharers.

      Watch This Film is Not Yet Rated.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    53. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Donne was wrong. Some people's _lives_ diminish us. For many, Valenti was one of them for much of his. His death diminishes us not at all.

    54. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by russotto · · Score: 1

      It was Turner Broadcasting CEO Jamie Kellner, not Valenti, who made comments about bathroom breaks. But he said "there's a certain amount of tolerance for going to the bathroom", not that bathroom breaks were or should be illegal.

      Give the devil his due; Valenti isn't responsible for all the evil in the world. Not even all the evil Hilary Rosen (& successors) aren't responsible for.

    55. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The judicial system has taken away almost all recourse against assholes, but I think we all should all use whatever means of revenge are available, even including posthumous revenge. Great job. Your blank check of advocacy just implied that you don't give a shit about what kind of revenge is enacted, even if it is on the grounds of rape or murder, so long as it occurs. After all, it's just Darwinism at work, right?
    56. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Elrac · · Score: 1

      From an evolutionary standpoint, I find it regrettable that stupid people breed more than smart people; this is the most likely explanation for your existence.

      To answer your question, I'm advocating legal or fringe-legal measures in lieu of other measures which, under rule of law, are too costly to the perpetrator. Apart from the modern legal aspect, evolution also doesn't favor overreaction.

      --
      When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    57. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Again, the point is that I disagree with him, but I certainly don't think the issues at stake are serious enough to CELEBRATE HIS DEATH over.

      Fair enough. I do. It is merely a matter on which we disagree.

      I also support the death penalty. And I support it for far smaller crimes than those perpetrated by Jack. For example, I believe in the death penalty for people who commit a single murder. Even when they murderer had a pretty good reason for doing it (that came short of justifiable homicide).

      Jack had some pretty good reasons (at least in his mind) for paying Congress to violate their oaths of office. But that doesn't make his actions any less treasonous.

    58. Re:Now there's the Slashdot I know and love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The single most frustrating thing about Valenti and his ilk, beyond people involved in things like environmental groups and such, the RIAA/MPAA/etc. are trying to limit people's rights in order to protect a profit scheme. More than that, a profit scheme built on a scarcity that no longer exists. They're trying to hold back technology in order to keep making easy money. It's hard for me to support or respect that. While I'll acknowledge that not every anti-pollution lobbyist has the purest of motives, I can understand and appreciate the idea of protecting the environment, even if I don't agree on all the details. But I'm having a real hard time respecting someone who's crusade was so clearly motivated by protecting the profits of a bunch of old, uncreative business people. bump
  76. Disgusting by Rydia · · Score: 1

    All the comments expressing joy seriously make me sick. The man disagreed with you on essentially political matters. If you want to make it a "rights" question, the right he was trying to take away wasn't even a constitutional one! It was an esoteric statutory right that few really know anything about.

    Were he Stalin, or Hitler, then yes, perhaps this would be warranted. But really, no-one here knows a damn thing about Jack Valenti other than the fact that he advocated for a different IP scheme than you. If you are happy for the death of someone who opposed you on such a ridiculously insignificant aspect of life, then you are fifteen times worse than you imagine Valenti to be.

    Absolutely sickening. Save the moral outrage for something worth your outrage.

    1. Re:Disgusting by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Spare us your self-righteous pap. He caused people to be sued for copyright infringement and lose their homes and assets while living like a king. He was fortunate to have died a natural death.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    2. Re:Disgusting by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Advocating a different IP scheme than you" is "a ridiculously insignificant aspect of life"?

      I hate to break it to you, but copyright is a free speech issue, and speech is pretty damn important. What he did at the MPAA was no better than advocating any other form of censorship. Should we be sad about the deaths of book-burners too?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    3. Re:Disgusting by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 0

      > All the comments expressing joy seriously make me sick. The man disagreed with you
      > on essentially political matters.

      Destroying tens of billions of dollars in IP; using the force of arms (& courts) to destroy the productive work of millions; raging a campaign of terror that makes Osama, Stallin, & Hitler look mild...is what you call "political"? Please kill yourself before you breed.

      > If you want to make it a "rights" question, the right he was trying to take away
      > wasn't even a constitutional one!

      The Constitution says that "No Person Shall be Deprived of Life, Liberty, or Property Without Due Process of Law" in the 8th and 14th amendments. The Constitution says that Congress shall protect the rights of IP creators by securing to them the exclusive use of their IP "for a limited time" (article 1.) The Constitution says that "no law shall pass expost-facto" (the 8th amendment.) If you didn't know this, please kill yourself before you breed.

      > It was an esoteric statutory right that few really know anything about.

      If you really believe that, please kill yourself before you breed.

      > Were he Stalin, or Hitler, then yes, perhaps this would be warranted.

      Yes, he was, and yes, this is warranted. Now, please, kill yourself before you breed.

      > But really, no-one here knows a damn thing about Jack Valenti other than the fact
      > that he advocated for a different IP scheme than you. If you are happy for the
      > death of someone who opposed you on such a ridiculously insignificant aspect of
      > life, then you are fifteen times worse than you imagine Valenti to be.

      IP is the most valuable property that I produce. I trade my IP for my home, my vehicle, my food, my clothes. Jack stole more IP from me than I have ever been able to sell. He, his family, and his friends deserve to see their children raped and tortured to death. Now please, kill your children and yourself...quickly!

      > Absolutely sickening. Save the moral outrage for something worth your outrage.

      You are sickening. I hope we meet face to face one day.

      Andy Out!

  77. I sense an MST3K ripoff... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    I can see it now: Every week Satan, who is inexplicably dressed in a green labcoat and assisted by a guy named Frank, will send Jack a bad movie that slipped through the cracks of the rating system. Of course, Jack will be kept company by some wise-cracking friends made out of brimstone.

    --
    This sig is false.
  78. Re:Good ?? by westcoast+philly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, we all hate the guy, or at least what the guy stood for: money. But really, all he was doing was trying to keep himself employed. His tactics sucked ass, and his technique was a little bit... sub-par, but what I've seen of this story so far, the reader-base response has been pretty ugly.

    The guy is dead. No need to be disrespectful of a dead guy. Don't send flowers, that's fine. But no need to piss yourself over it.

    just my opinion, feel free to disagree.. it's your right. Someone out there probably liked the guy..

  79. Going so soon, I wouldn't hear of it! by msblack · · Score: 1

    -CRUDE HUMOR ON-
    Ding Dong! The Witch is dead.
    Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!
    Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.
    Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
    Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead.
    She's gone where the goblins go,
    Below - below - below.
    Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out.
    Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
    Let them know The Wicked Witch is dead!
    -CRUDE HUMOR OFF-

    Rest in peace, Jack. You made a lot of people happy and gave us the wonderful GMRX rating system! Many thanks for the Hollywood Blacklist too!

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  80. $50 by darnok · · Score: 1

    ...for the person who can smuggle a bunch of copied DVDs into the casket, preferably into his suit pockets.

    (Some time later)

    Devil: Welcome to Hell, Jack. Glad to have you aboard

    Jack: B...b...but I've been good. I've been brave, loyal and true to my industry masters this past 38 years! Why am I here?

    Devil: Check your pockets. Now, will it be the burning spear up the clacker, or eternity watching Waterworld?

  81. Bye Jack, Enjoy Hell by fishyfool · · Score: 1

    You Fucking Bastard. Yaknow Jack, I'll put in a good word for you to the man upstairs if you'll take Mitch Bainwol and his crew with you. maybe you'll get some furlough time or something.

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
  82. Valenti in Hell by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    Valenti enters: "Hey, whose in charge here, there's been a mistake! I'm Jack Valenti, President of the MPAA!"

    Bored demon: "Bend over, spread your cheeks, and SHUT THE FUCK UP, you depraved scumsucker."

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    1. Re:Valenti in Hell by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like this:

      Satan: How come you always want to make love to me from behind? Is it because you want to pretend I'm somebody else?
      Valenti: Satan, your ass is gigantic and red. Who am I going to pretend you are, Liza Minelli?

      --
      What?
  83. An important reminder... by tehwebguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...to everyone at the MPAA / RIAA: We are younger than you, you will die before us. After that, we will change the laws you purchased.

    Every time these organizations cycle out officers, there will be younger, 'hipper', more intelligent people taking their places.

    Sometimes you just have to let a few generations die off to make progress.

    --
    -- lol pwned
    1. Re:An important reminder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the meantime they will enjoy their riches and stranglehold on American media/patents/copyright/civil rights. I rather dislike the "Let's wait 'em out" policy.

    2. Re:An important reminder... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly true. Mindset can be the hardest thing to change in the world. This is how dictatorships live on, in the sociology and in the people's mind, long after they have been overturned. I'm from an Eastern European country, so I feel this firsthand. Progress is greatly hindered by the fact that at least the third of the voting population became a pensioner before or around 1990.

      It is a problem, because in a lot of these people's minds there is no moral difference between the two systems. In other words, they live by the patterns they learned in the dictatorship, while enjoying the benefits of a democracy. Thing is, this doesn't really work, because they don't understand the fundamental issues of living in a democracy, like making the leadership accountable. That is the duty of everyone that lives in a democracy. This is a price we have to pay for enjoying the benefits of democracy. It is not a convenient thing to do, to carefully evaluate and then elect the best candidate and if he messes up, hold him accountable.

      That was the theoretical part, but it has very real consequences and it is a very real problem. The people who spent most of their lives in a dictatorship, combined with a democrafically aging society makes a very bad match for democracy. Most of these people still evaluate parties based on who will give them the most gifts, who appellates more on the 'politics' of their youth, which was a dictatorship. They aren't troubled if some politician (dare I say prime minister) acts like as if he's still back in that dictatorship. It is the "we'll throw you some bones, just don't question the leaders" philosophy of a dictatorship. I'm sick of the way it permiates into and poisons a would be democracy through the minds of people who have suffered in the previous system.

      The future is more hopeful though. The youth who didn't live in that system rejects those ideas with a big majority. The age line which divides the younger people and the more democratic parties from the old people and the ex state party is going up. Normal thinking is slowly spreading as people are born who were not poisoned by a regime.

      This might not be too closely related to the MPAA, but should tell you something about the power of the mindset and it's effects.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    3. Re:An important reminder... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...to everyone at the MPAA / RIAA: We are younger than you, you will die before us. After that, we will change the laws you purchased.

      ...until we get offered 7-figure salaries and power - in which case we'll just end up lining our own pockets and being no different from you.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:An important reminder... by revengebomber · · Score: 0

      But we must wonder: what laws will we make, that will seem arcane and illogical to the next generation?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:An important reminder... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      to everyone at the MPAA / RIAA: We are younger than you, you will die before us. After that, we will change the laws you purchased.

      Why would they care? They can't spend their bonuses and corporate profits when they're dead.

      Besides which, that assumes that they're not busily grooming their replacements right now, training them to carry on their work. I'll never be in a position to have much influence on that industry, given my preferred career - will you?

    6. Re:An important reminder... by TREE · · Score: 1

      What?
      Younger != more intelligent. What on earth gave you the idea that it did? Most generations are just about the same as the ones before them.

      (Does this mean I'm old, now?)

    7. Re:An important reminder... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      A lot of historians, particularly historians of science, have made the claim that about the only way anything ever advances is by coming up with a new idea, publicizing it, and then waiting for all the experts in the field to die off, at which point the new idea, if still viable, is accepted. They claim that it's rare experts change their minds. Instead, the experts change. So: yeah, what you said, only replace "Sometimes" with "Usually".

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  84. I have not won anything but hope. by twitter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Speaking to those of you who have expressed distasteful feelings here, try to remember that there is such a thing as "winning gracefully," "being a good sport" or whatever you wish to call it.

    The most disrespectful sentiment is that his death is some sort of victory. It's not because the bad policies and laws he fostered and believed in are still here. His passing brings some hope of change and that is what we celebrate.

    This isn't the time to debate them [unAmerican laws].

    On the contrary, now is the perfect time to reflect on the man and his beliefs and what he accomplished. What better time will there ever be?

    He believed in digital restrictions until at least 2004 and probably went to his grave without understanding the real social cost of such control. To this day, I'm forced to chose between digital freedom and participation in popular culture. There is no middle ground because people like him considered you and me an insignificant minority who should use other options. Rights don't work like that. You can't violate people's rights because few people would bother to exercise them. While many of the things he said have been repudiated for 20 years, the logic he used never changed and he continued to say things we all hate. Those things hurt all of us every day.

    The passing of generations is often the only way real change happens. Mr. Valenti was a product of a different time. His loyalties reflect those times but his intransigence is timeless. The run away success of the VCR was helpful to those he professed loyalty toward, and his opposition was harmful to them. It is surprising that he never learned the lesson. We can all feel sad for his family but we can also look at the world as a place that's a little less hostile.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I have not won anything but hope. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      His passing brings some hope of change and that is what we celebrate.

      Yeah, great, he's dead, yay! Now we can sort out copyright laws.

      Chrissake...he's not Ceausescu or Stalin or someone else who has caused intense suffering (beyond the typical Slashbot "suffering" of DRM) and performed insane abuses of human rights (again, beyond DRM) on a mass scale, someone who truly does deserve their death to be celebrated, and truly DID have their death celebrated. He was just a little bit too militant about copyright. I see no reason to dance on his grave and/or gain hope from that.

      You talk about him precisely like he WAS a Ceausescu/Stalin. It's very, very worrying.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:I have not won anything but hope. by twitter · · Score: 1

      A pest writes:

      Chrissake...he's not Ceausescu or Stalin or someone else who has caused intense suffering (beyond the typical Slashbot "suffering" of DRM) and performed insane abuses of human rights

      Other can abuses only come after the first are tolerated: suppression of free speech. People who know the truth cast off tyrants. Valenti did much to extend the limits of physical media into the electronic world and convinced many people like you that such restrictions must exist and are acceptable.

      Digital restrictions are not acceptable because they eliminate your freedom. You already must chose between that freedom and participation in popular culture. Those who chose freedom are that much less able to relate with and convince others to fight for their own freedom, not that those who chose restrictions have any more ability to control or use their culture. For digital restrictions to be universally applied, all of us must relinquish ownership of our computers to those who would decide what we can and can't copy. That control gives total information control to it's masters, worse than any before. From there any abuse can go on.

      People under Stalin were told they were free and were forced to dance and sing about their freedom and happiness. Those that disagreed were exterminated. The system existed by a combination of total information control, lawless exercise of power and snitching. People unable to hope for real freedom turned against each other to fight for petty comforts and survival. The makers of non free culture have similar campaigns to divide and make helpless their victims. You may think their power is insignificant, but that is only because you chose not to fight it openly.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  85. You're right, I was so wrong by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Funny

    The French, back in the day, had a better way of handling people like that.

    It was called the Guillotine.

    America's problem is we hate the French and did not learn to emulate them in this case.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:You're right, I was so wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We just shoot people. Guys like Jack? In the gut. And we take the time to watch them die. More civilized than the French, no, I'll grant you that. But what it lacks in civilization is makes up for in satisfaction.

    2. Re:You're right, I was so wrong by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Except the United States has absolutely emulated the French in that we are one of the few nations in the Western world that continues to use the death penalty as a punishment for certain crimes. France abolished the death penalty in 1981.

      As an aside I find it absolutely hilarious that some are advocating for killing those they disagree with. As if access to Britney Spears' music is an inalienable right that people would kill for.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  86. plus one inciteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me ask you one question
    Is your money that good
    Will it buy you forgiveness
    Do you think that it could
    I think you will find
    When your death takes its toll
    All the money you made
    Will never buy back your soul

    And I hope that you die
    And your death'll come soon
    I will follow your casket
    In the pale afternoon
    And I'll watch while you're lowered
    Down to your deathbed
    And I'll stand o'er your grave
    'Til I'm sure that you're dead

  87. cite please by adam · · Score: 4, Informative

    you have made this statement in multiple places in this discussion. I have tried to verify the veracity of your claims, however google finds nothing, and the ny court law server is throwing errors when i query it, but the ny court system web site specifically has a "how to defend myself when i cannot afford a lawyer" pdf, which might indicate you are incorrect (..if a lawyer is free to anybody in any court, why would you even need a pdf guide to defending yourself pro se.. EVERYONE would just take the free lawyer). Unfortunately it crashes both firefox and ie, so i'll never know what it contains.

    and you have the gall (in another post) to call other states "redneck" ? tell your 'redneck state' to hire some better sysadmins from the "crazy redneck" states i've lived in where one is NOT provided an attorney by the civil courts ;) ..(redneck places like.. you know.. CA.. WA..) ...so if you can find a cite (or a new england lawyer can reply and confirm/deny), because this sounds somewhat implausible to me. in my experience, even in CRIMINAL court, getting access to a free lawyer is very difficult unless you are up on very serious charges or completely indigent. for instance, in WA, one must show bank records to the court (etc) to prove one has no means of income, etc.. and even then they provide you with an attorney, you must agree to pay something like $350-500 to their firm for representing you.

    so, since everyone here seems to disagree with you, I would respectfully ask for you to cite your source.. I am quite interested to find out if this is true. As of yet, I am under the impression that nothing is free in the US legal system.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:cite please by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Nice sig, so appropriate :)

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    2. Re:cite please by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

      I am JSG's sense of karmic irony, considering that Jack died of a stroke.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  88. obligatory quote from by alexandreracine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well hello Mister Fancypants. Well, I've got news for you pal, you ain't leadin' but two things right now: Jack and shit... and Jack left town.

    --
    No sig for now.
  89. Simpson's Quote by DTemp · · Score: 1

    "I'm tired of Hollywood pretty-boys like you and Jack Valenti thinking you can have any woman you want." -Homer Simpson, speaking to Mel Gibson

    1. Re:Simpson's Quote by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      If you read this, I didn't reply right away because I might have wanted to mod this thread also; I didn't.

      Oddly enough that episode was just on a few days ago.
      I still like when the Mel is reading the letters and comes to Prof. Frink's.
      Paraphrased, "It was the best ever, despite the absense of flubber. Glavvin."
      Mel read 'Glavvin' in a question like way because he had no idea what it meant.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  90. Because of you, Jack, I've stopped watching movies by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    That is the nicest thing that I can say for him. The worst would put the rest of these comments to shame. And there's no point in beating a dead Jack. May he be less of a tool when he reigns in hell.

  91. Wooooot! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Yay! Skipping commercials is no longer theft!

    They say dancing on someone's grave is in poor taste.

    Then color me plaids with stripes.

    Any ladies care to join me for a tango? Watch your step. The soil is still a bit loose.

  92. rot in hell, you corrupt asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it wasn't for an ocean between me and your grave, I'd enjoy leaving a big european shit on it.

  93. wink wink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The famous photo-series mentioned in the initial post has one where Congressman Albert Thomas winks back at a LBJ.

    http://www.rense.com/general41/wew.htm

  94. Re:Good ?? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

    "One owes respect to the living. To the dead, one owes only truth." - some dead Frenchman

  95. goodnight by hxnwix · · Score: 1

    and good riddance, you stupid fuck.

    1. Re:goodnight by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      HEAR HEAR!

  96. Valenti as Devil (Image) by gbnewby · · Score: 1

    Here's a little photoshop job I did awhile ago with Jack Valenti as Devil (131KB gif).

    1. Re:Valenti as Devil (Image) by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Don't quit your day-job, kid.

  97. Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Every DVD ever published. No region code for heaven. :-)

    RIP Mr Valenti. May you make it though because you tried to do good.

    1. Re:Worse by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      RIP Mr Valenti

      I tried to but I couldn't crack the DRM.

      Rich

  98. It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by mikkelm · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. when ridiculing someone's death nets you +5 insightful. I'm sure many of you have spent a lot of time sitting alone and clenching your fists at people, but no matter how much you disagree with someone's opinions, you just don't marginalise and ridicule his death because of it.

    Get a sense of decency.

    1. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by nagora · · Score: 1
      no matter how much you disagree with someone's opinions, you just don't marginalise and ridicule his death because of it.

      Well, first of all you're wrong in the general sense: I'm happy to celebrate the death of any number of bigots and racists, for example. Secondly, we're not talking, in this case, about mere "opinions". Valenti changed the world and he used corrupt methods to do so (getting a judge who was a personal friend is normally regarded as a reason for mistrial) and lied to elected members of government in order to have his "opinion" enshrined and backed by the weight of the law qhile marginalising the opinions of the supposed democratic electorate, who now have to live with this bastard's mess.

      Good riddance to bad rubbish. Pity it didn't happen sooner.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by mikkelm · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a huge difference between not being saddened by someone's death, and downright laughing at it, praising it, and suggesting some of the absurd things to his grave that people have done here.

      It doesn't matter who they were. Sinking that low is sick. Respect the lives of others as you expect them to respect yours.

    3. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Respect the lives of others as you expect them to respect yours.
      If I behaved like Jack Valenti, I would expect exactly the level of respect I see here. In fact, I find that encouraging. Don't be wishy-washy, giving everyone a gold star just because they happen to be alive. Respect is earned.
    4. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      You don't have to respect the person. Just respect life. I'm by no means "wishy-washy", or giving anyone a gold star for anything.

      Respect for your actions is earned. Respect for life is something any decent person has for anyone.

    5. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You don't have to respect the person. Just respect life. [...] Respect for life is something any decent person has for anyone.

      That's interesting, but what does it mean to "respect life", and are we not doing so sufficiently in this case? If we don't respect the person, and believe that the world is better off with him dead, are we somehow not respecting life by saying so?

      In any case, most people's respect for life is limited. We all eat plants, most of us eat animals, and most of us support, either actively or passively, the semi-organized killing of people in wars. So life is clearly not entirely sacrosanct, to most of us.

      I've demonstrated my respect for Jack Valenti's life in the fact that I didn't personally kill him, but that's really as far as it goes. Beyond that basic courtesy, everything else needs to be earned, if you're a thinking being with some degree of what we think of as free will.

    6. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, but what does it mean to "respect life", and are we not doing so sufficiently in this case? If we don't respect the person, and believe that the world is better off with him dead, are we somehow not respecting life by saying so?
      Yes. I really do not want to explain it in any further detail. If you cannot see why on your own, I very much doubt that you ever will.

      Judging by how you go into semantics instead of realising the practical and completely natural limits to a common philosophy, I'd say you're too detached from the real world to care about your human side anyway.
    7. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Judging by how you go into semantics instead of realising the practical and completely natural limits to a common philosophy, I'd say you're too detached from the real world to care about your human side anyway.
      That's pretty judgemental for someone who's lecturing people about not having sufficient respect for life. I have respect for the people who interact with me respectfully. Not only do I care about my human side, I care about the human side of other people who I respect. However, I don't believe that people who have actively gone out of their way to harm and exploit me, my friends, or my fellow humans, are deserving of such respect.

      My foray into semantics was an attempt to try to learn from you what you meant by "respect for life", and how that related to the current situation. Sorry if that upset you somehow.
    8. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      However, I don't believe that people who have actively gone out of their way to harm and exploit me, my friends, or my fellow humans, are deserving of such respect.


      No one is asking you to respect him as a person. Common decency, however, is to respect that he just died, and while you might not have agreed with his opinions and his actions, you don't verbally dance on his grave. There's a reason why people typically don't break into graveyards and carve insults into gravestones. That reason extends to everywhere, including the Internet, and the anonymity it grants you does not mean that it's suddenly "okay" to behave like that.
    9. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you want people who may have different values from you to share or even just understand your perspective, you need to at least be able to explain that perspective, not just list the rules you live by as though everyone should automatically recognize their absolute validity.

      You've made categorical statements like "Common decency is..." and "you don't verbally dance on his grave...", and alluded to reasons ("There's a reason why...") without actually explaining those reasons. My conclusion is that like many people, you're following rules someone else made for you, which you take for granted but don't understand well enough to articulate. That's pretty common, but again, you shouldn't expect others to automatically accept those those rules unless you can at least verbalize their rationale.

      (As an aside, you also draw some parallels which don't necessarily hold, e.g. that the taboo against actually desecrating graves should extend equally to discussing the idea in a way that's clearly not intended literally.)

      As a reminder that there are people with different value systems from yours, read this comment. Do you think those people are "too detached from the real world to care about their human side", as you accused me of being?

      You may not agree with those who are metaphorically dancing on Valenti's grave, but they're not forcing you to join them. You, on the other hand, seem to want them to follow the same rules you follow, and when they don't, or even when someone questions the reasons behind your rules, your response borders on questioning their very humanity.

      In my value system, questioning the humanity of those with different values than you is a big no-no, which historically has led to all sorts of bad outcomes. You might want to ponder how your plea for decency turned into a step down such a dark, dark road.

    10. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Well I'm happy to let you know that your conclusions are way off. I'm perfectly capable of articulating my reasoning, which I've already done previously. That you failed to notice leads me to believe that you like a few others simply aren't able to comprehend that your esoteric opinion on decency should be moderated to respect the common consensus.

      You don't use coarse language in a family restaurant in front of children. Even if you do at home. You don't walk around naked in the middle of a city. Even if you're a nudist. You also don't go against every bit of common (And yes, it is common. If you cannot understand this, then you have a problem.) decency and taunt someone's death at a venue as public and diverse as slashdot. You're on the Internet, yes, but like I said before, common decency extends to every public place. Virtual or not.

      In your value system, me asking you to moderate your taunting of someone else's death might be turning down a "dark, dark road". You might want to ponder why, after arguing how free you are to have a different opinion, you assume that I share yours on the subject.

      I'm not going to waste any more time arguing something this elementary with someone who puts as little thought into his replies as you seem to be doing. Bye.

    11. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      That's pretty judgemental for someone who's lecturing people about not having sufficient respect for life. I have respect for the people who interact with me respectfully. Not only do I care about my human side, I care about the human side of other people who I respect. However, I don't believe that people who have actively gone out of their way to harm and exploit me, my friends, or my fellow humans, are deserving of such respect. ok, you say you got respect for the people who interact with you respectfully; I'll bite ...

      What with the people who cannot interact anymore because they are dead?
      Does that mean that person lost respect forever and ever even when he cannot undo his actions towards you?
      Still knowing, this person will never be able to correct his actions; why not offer him some peace instead?

      I mostly agree someone will earn respect by having a good basis of interaction; but; isn't this too deep-edged?
      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    12. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 1

      In your value system, me asking you to moderate your taunting of someone else's death might be turning down a "dark, dark road".
      No, your questioning my humanity because I have different values from you is turning down a dark, dark road. The same road that leads people to justify killing other people who believe differently than they do. The same road that leads to the justification of genocide (people in the group being targetted "should be given a sub-human status.")

      You might want to ponder why, after arguing how free you are to have a different opinion, you assume that I share yours on the subject.
      I don't assume that at all. For all I know, you honestly believe that people who have different values from you are sinners that will go to hell, and that you should do all you can to help them get there. Heaven knows there are enough such people on Slashdot. However, I gave you the benefit of the doubt, assuming that you might have some of the humanity which you've questioned in me, and that you might be able to recognize that your behavior is not so different from the behavior of the people you're so righteously claiming are violating your standards of decency. You have violated my standards of decency, for no better reason than that you were frustrated by your inability to express yourself.
    13. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 1

      What with the people who cannot interact anymore because they are dead?
      Those people had a whole lifetime to worry about that. I'm not a big fan of the deathbed conversion - it's all very well for someone who is acknowledging their sins and repenting, but it doesn't really help the people who suffered as a result of those sins. It only encourages bad behavior if people feel they can act however they wish and be forgiven for it later, no matter what they do.

      Does that mean that person lost respect forever and ever even when he cannot undo his actions towards you?
      If you want to be respected in this life, you have to act in a way deserving of respect. Are you suggesting that after someone's death, we should respect them no matter what they did during their life? There have been some pretty bad people in this world who are now dead - do you respect them all? I'm curious about what that respect really means. What about other people, who acted better? What does our respect for them mean, if we respect everyone no matter what they did?

      Still knowing, this person will never be able to correct his actions; why not offer him some peace instead?
      One reason is to avoid giving other people the impression that they can act without consequences. If you are so inclined, you might choose to forgive someone for their actions, but often that doesn't happen until after you've worked through your anger towards them, which is partly what's happening in this thread. But even if you forgive them, it doesn't mean you have to respect them the way you would respect someone who had done good deeds.

      I mostly agree someone will earn respect by having a good basis of interaction; but; isn't this too deep-edged?
      I don't know what you think should be the alternative. We certainly respect some people more than others, in life and in death. I don't see a problem with our respect for "bad" people being very low, indistinguishable from zero. I don't know Valenti well enough to know whether he deserves that, but there have certainly been some people who do, in my opinion.
    14. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      sounds fair, still, I think it's more of a social issue of showing respect towards other.

      Dancing on a grave is sure not a sign of respect and a sign of being social towards eachother ;) neither is laughing because of it which might hurt the relatives around. It's the impact some people cause because it's "just the internet"... Some people might say hitting their wife is a form of respect too; I'd call both bullshit; both are live people with a mind and a soul .. (ok ok exclude Chuck Norris ;))

      He is sure not going to change your anger whatsoever so I still sortof wonder what extra you are getting by being mad at a dead person, maybe disrespecting his final rest? What's the change going to be for you? What might the change be for his relatives reading or hearing such statements? What's such social impact upon the ones around us by saying such things?

      I find it's a quite grey zone where society and culture has set the basic of respecting the dead -together- with the relatives and friends who have (mostly) nothing to do with this guy basically because the dead cannot change things anyways...

      It's nothing personal; some comments are rather more "shocking" of some wishing him even more dead than he already is ; I'm quite sarcastic myself, I can deal with a lot, I don't feel hurt by your statements and can perfectly find myself in them. Still, I do wonder why not thinking further than that and wondering why you would be mad at a dead person, what's going to change for you in life and if it is really letting you feel better?

      I knew there was a reason to live ;)

      cheers!

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    15. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by alienmole · · Score: 1

      what extra you are getting by being mad at a dead person
      It's the same as the reason we express sorrow when someone worthy of respect and love dies. Expressing sorrow is of no benefit to the person that's died, but it's meaningful to the people who remain. The same is true of expressing anger at the person who died, it's just that it's meaningful in different ways. You said that dancing on a grave is not a sign of being social to each other, but that's not correct. If many people are doing it, those people are being social, and it can be a bonding experience for a group, and reaffirm their beliefs and values.

      What's such social impact upon the ones around us by saying such things?
      That's the important question. The social impact of saying that even in death, someone who did bad things is not worthy of respect should, ideally, be quite a powerful message to those still living. However, I fear that the message is heavily diluted by the existence of the taboo about speaking ill of the dead. It would be interesting to examine the history of that taboo, because it's certainly not universal. It seems to mainly benefit those who do bad things, so it's not clear why some people believe in it so strongly. I have yet to see a good explanation of the rationale behind it.

      Still, I do wonder why not thinking further than that and wondering why you would be mad at a dead person, what's going to change for you in life and if it is really letting you feel better?
      Expressing anger can be healthy. For myself, I don't like what Valenti stood for but I haven't made any statements about desecrating his grave or anything like that. But my position is that if people feel strongly enough to say such things, the response should not be "you're not allowed to say that"; rather, anyone who feels upset by such comments should defend Valenti on his merits. If they can't do that, then it doesn't seem as though they have anything useful to contribute, because it's hardly a valid response to someone else's anger to say "you shouldn't feel that way". Very often, people who feel angry about something are demonstrating a stronger sense of values and social justice than the person who doesn't show, or tries to suppress such emotion.
    16. Re:It's a very sad day on slashdot.. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      You said that dancing on a grave is not a sign of being social to each other, but that's not correct. If many people are doing it, those people are being social, and it can be a bonding experience for a group, and reaffirm their beliefs and values. I still might add a social thing is something which society deems to see "social" (mostly in respect) towards eachother. I do not think you'll find lots of people thinking "dancing-on-the-graves" is the weekly social thing to do ;) The respect is missing for him and his relatives at that moment;

      ok, you don't want to respect him, fine with me, the social impact is still bigger with (such) "disrespect".
      What kind of message you think his friends or wife has with these kind of statements?
      Mostly they say here "with all respect and better strength about the loss of your relative"; your message on the other hand is the complete other direction of this; sending a message "I'm glad this sucker is down"; bringing complete other emotions and thougths towards the ones who -do- feel with the family..

      It'll be always a knife with two sides; which the one finds social or respectful is for the other one the biggest shame of them all; still; I might add; would you like people to dance on your (friends) grave? To me it's the same as finding the will more important on the day when someone died instead of the person himself; even if it might be the richest sucker of 'm all .. fairness and respect (towards others) is still a way to go..

      The Internet is not seen valuable enough as human-to-human communication medium; some people see the Internet as a playground where you can say or yell or do whatever you want; because "it is just the Internet". These kinds of statements on the Internet might still be delivered into wrong eyes; making wrong tougths; even when you hate this guy; and make it even harder on the family to cope with something which they cannot change anyways; which they will probably not even understand where this sucker went wrong ....

      I got to note; more or less I do think similar with you; with exception of those things which we call "public statements" which could do more harm than good; even it would let you feel better because you have said them. I'm glad I've replied on this to see a more clear view of how others have their perspections toward the (evil) dead and the (evil) living; with still the minimal needed degree of respect; kudos it was mind-refreshing lol
      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  99. Ding-dong, the witch is dead by acacia · · Score: 1

    Good riddance. The world is better off without him. If only he carried some incurable disease that was passed on to executives at Disney, Sony, and the RIAA, perhaps we might see the dying spark fair use fanned into a fire once again.

    When I first heard this I felt joy. Then I felt a little guilty at having that joy - after all, this was a human life. Then again, he is in a fairly elite club - there are few people outside of elected office that have done more to trample on the constitution than he. To the great moderator in the sky, I hope you give him all he has coming to him.

    --
    ~Religion is O.K., as long as it gets you laid.
  100. The working stiffs .... by deek · · Score: 1

    'I found the most convincing part to be the working stiffs,' said Valenti of the PSA, 'the guys who have a modest home and kids who go to public schools. They make $75,000 to $100,000 a year. That's not much to live on.

    Truly we are bereft of a visionary. Rest In Peace, Jack, 'cause we sure don't want another stiff to join the workforce.

  101. Oh no - like obi wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is struck down, does that mean his power from beyond the grave will be more then we can imagine?

  102. My quick take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posterity dotes on graves a'plenty
    But none is Nobler than this:
    Here lie the bones of Jack Valenti:
    Stop, traveller, and piss!
  103. His name is written on the soles of my shoes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye, Jack.

  104. Ding dong... by asninn · · Score: 1

    Ding dong, the witch is dead. Good riddance, Jack.

    --
    butter the donkey
  105. Sickening. by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1

    Of all of the postings that I have seen since I started reading /. in the 90s, those in response to Mr. Valenti's death have been some of the most disturbing. I was expecting--and even appreciated, some of the comedic posts. And I don't mind most of the disrespectful posts: Most of you thought he was an asshole. Congratulations. He's dead. Good for you.

    But the level of hatred that is showing up is disturbing. And it makes me wonder how many of you people would have shot and killed him if you knew that you could have gotten away with it.

    To a good number of you: Show some class--if only out of respect to those who did care for him.

    To the creeps: See a therapist.

    To those of you can only now, after his death, vigorously express your hatred for Mr. Valenti, well, I bet we'll be seeing some of you on CNN in the future.

    1. Re:Sickening. by bit01 · · Score: 1

      But the level of hatred that is showing up is disturbing.

      And entirely appropriate for somebody who was a prime mover in taking away the rights and culture of millions of people.

      Some of those giving him "respect" need look in the mirror and think a little about their own fanaticism, why they think it's reasonable that a very small fraction of the population should be able to perpetually control a non-rivalrous good and endlessly profit from the cultural heritage of millions. It's feudalism all over again.

      ---

      "Advertising supported" just means you're paying twice over, once in time to watch/avoid the ad and twice in the increased price of the product to pay for the ad.

    2. Re:Sickening. by Guuge · · Score: 1

      Is CNN doing a special on necrophobes?

    3. Re:Sickening. by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Blah blah blah. Whatever. What was it that got Ebenezer Scrooge to repent and become a nice guy? The knowledge that if he didn't change his ways, people would celebrate his death.

      Valenti is dead, and can't read our mean-spirited posts. Other potential Scrooges can.

  106. Folks? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it as funny and satisfying as the next guy, but what's really accomplished? Jack was just a stick figure in the game, take him out and put the next crook, erh, rook in, and the game's on again. It's not like anything changes just 'cause one finally croaked.

    Yes, it's refreshing to piss on the grave of people we really, really, really hate. Too bad that they don't care about it, or they might stop doing what they are doing. I mean, I for one wouldn't like to have a funeral with a ton of people coming just to check personally if I'm REALLY dead and it isn't just wishful thinking.

    But I doubt that Jack cared, or that his successor will. They know we hate them. They know we'd at best offer them a glass of water if they were drowning. Still they continue. If we want them to stop, we gotta make their life miserable, not their death. They don't care about us as long as they're living, how much less do they care once they're dead?

    But, you know, nothing but good about the deceased and all that, so I want to end this with something good about Jack: He was ... umm... Yes. That's about the best one can say about him: He was.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  107. Reincarnationists say "yay" too! by NickFortune · · Score: 1

    Of course you can be sad if you believe in reincarnation but it wasn't your point, I guess.

    I'm sure he'll make an absolutely splendid slime mould.

    I mean, after all that practice...

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  108. Valenti was not 100% evil by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1
    He flew (IIRC) bombers during WWII, an act requiring considerable physical courage. For that service to his country, I respect him.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  109. Coincidence? by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Happy World Intellectual Property Day! April 26th, a day to remember forever! It's also the anniversary of the start of the Chernobyl disaster. Coincidence? You decide. ;)
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  110. Shame. by ring-eldest · · Score: 1

    I am ashamed that no one shot this fool before he died of old age. An armed populace? What's it good for if this jackass can live to be 85?

  111. now would be a good time to post by alizard · · Score: 1

    the GPS coordinated of his grave.

    An appropriate epitaph would be "Too rotten to be forgotten".

    I hope Hollywood never recovers from the damage they have paid him to do to the general public, consumer technology companies, and to themselves.

    He was one of the chief spokesdroids for the Hollywood "screw the customer, let's use Congress to make it easier to extract money from the public" business model.

  112. yes, I feel that way by alizard · · Score: 1

    and I don't have any need to apologize over it.

    He's worked for an organization that uses lawbots to harass innocent people and extort money from them. The laws it bought are an attack on American competitiveness and the creativity of technological entepreneurs The evil which he helped do will live on after his death.

    It distresses you that people want to piss on his grave? It distresses you that people think this something to celebrate?

    Here, have a virtual kleenex to weep into.

    Millions of people die every day, some of which have made contributions to humanity to be proud of. Valenti's just a piece of vermin working for an industry infested with them..

  113. done more in his life for his beliefs than by alizard · · Score: 1

    "we can only hope to achieve"

    So did the Vtech shooter.When are you going to celebrate his life?

    SINCERITY IN BELIEFS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MAKE WHAT IS BELIEVED IN A GOOD IDEA.

  114. Keep his grave a secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or it'll become a regular 'rest stop' for geeks! :-)

  115. spin!!!!! by ghostunit · · Score: 1

    nuff said

  116. NO! NONONONONONO! NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will NOT feel sorry for him. Most people here wanted him to rot in hell for all eternity, and I don't think they should be apologizing for that view now that he actually is.

    What he did was evil, vicious, callous, cold-hearted and affected billions of people. And his legacy will continue to do that for decades more.
    I don't care if he was nice to his friends and family or if he was a real stand-up guy you could trust to pick up your kids from school. That still doesn't change the fact that his entire job for four decades was to rape, pillage and burn down the rights of other people. And it is certainly no excuse.
    His company's persecutions of fair use and consumer rights were despicable and he is directly to blame for it.

    I'm sure his family and friends are sad, but tens of thousands of people die every single day on this planet and my heart bleeds infinitely more for them than it ever will for this douche bag.

    I didn't know him. I have nothing invested in this, the next lawyer prick is just going to jump out on stage right behind him and it will be business as usual at the MPAA. His death won't change a single policy he made. But that's still one down, plenty to go.

    They say a man's success in life can be measured by how many people show up at his funeral. I say, how about subtracting the amount of people willing to piss on your grave after you're gone because of the way you've treated them?

  117. Four notes is enough to infringe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that would be, what? 1.5 seconds?

    And when it's been DRM'd, there's no legal way to get at your silence for fair useage...

  118. Re:Amen to that! by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1, Troll

    Woo yeah, another money grubbing millionaire manipulistic thieving bastard is dead.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  119. Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Witch Is Dead... or so I would sing, but it would be an insult to witches/wiccans everywhere.

  120. I know he was detestable, but.. by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

    Is there any reason to be this disrespectful to the guy? He may have been a highly disliked human being - but he was still a human being. No one deserves the crap you guys have been laying on him the DAY AFTER HIS DEATH.

    This is the first time I've been ashamed to have a Slashdot account.

    1. Re:I know he was detestable, but.. by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 0

      > Is there any reason to be this disrespectful to the guy? He may have been a
      > highly disliked human being - but he was still a human being. No one
      > deserves the crap you guys have been laying on him the DAY AFTER HIS DEATH.
      >
      > This is the first time I've been ashamed to have a Slashdot account.

      This bastard destroyed tens of billions of dollars through absurdly frivolous lawsuits aimed at everyone who created IP who was not a member of his IP mafia family. He deserves what he's getting in Hell at this moment. He will continue to deserve it for the rest of eternity. It's just a shame he has surviving "family" members & "friends," in as much as cretins like Jack can ever have family or friends.

      As for your claim that he was human? I don't think so!

      Andy Out!

    2. Re:I know he was detestable, but.. by tsalaroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know what he's done, but still. Wait at least until after his wake or something. I agree with your opinion of him as a person, but I just don't agree with some of the things people are saying about his death. You know, most people like him end up crying and begging for forgiveness for what they've done in life while they're on their deathbed.

      He was also a pilot in WWII before he turned his strong convictions towards "protecting" an albeit sour industry.

      I guess my point is, you're lowering yourself to his level when you fling hate towards him at his death, rather than ignore or forgive him. Far better to show you are human (unlike him, as you say) and forgive or let be, than to become like the monster he was in life.

  121. Re:Twofo = GNAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my God ... I love slashdot.

  122. Where's Amnesty International?! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    I find it exceptionally cruel. Worst world's criminals don't deserve such end, and he didn't even partially meet the...
    oh wait...
    he wasn't executed?
    Pity.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  123. You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Equating Jack to the great monsters of the 20th century is simply a retort to those that claim he was simply a man."

    No, it's hyperbolic bullshit that taints the argument completely. Its the same type of SHIT that is killing / has killed real political discussion in this country.

    "You my friend, don't know what freedom is when it is staring you in the face."

    No one is saying you can't say those things, moron.
    Don't expect to say incredibly stupid things and not be called out on them.
    Don't think that my calling you a sick bastard for celebrating someone's death is taking away your "freedom".
    Funny how I asked to stop they hyperbole yet your post is completly full of it.
    I ask that you call a spade a spade and stop dragging public discourse into the gutter.
    Rhetoric like yours gets people nowhere.
    You talk of Valenti as if you know him. Funny thing is, I bet you don't beyond what he did regarding the MPAA and your "precious" entertainment.

    1. Re:You're an idiot by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Correction:

      "Equating Jack to the great monsters of the 20th century is simply a hyperbolic retort to those that claim he was simply a man."

      Happy? Suppose not, my point is that the man was generally considered a piece of shit. You can cry "Stop it, damn it, just stop." all you want, but it's just hyperbolic crap about how he was a person that magically deserves respect because he's now dead. As if death somehow magically absolves people of all sins. Seriously, why do you care? Now you say I'm a sick bastard, I really don't care, I say Jack was a piece of shit and you get all worked up. You try to justify his shallow view of humanity by the fact that he might have grandkids. Who cares, he knocked some twit up, bravo! He's still responsible for ruining the lives of other people's grandkids, screw him and screw you for defending him.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  124. Re:Amen to that! by number1scatterbrain · · Score: 1

    John Steinbeck wrote in "East of Eden" that when Andrew Carnegie died,
        all he heard people say was "Thank God that S.O.B. is dead".

    --
    Remember the future...
  125. But seriously, how tiny was his penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no seriously

  126. Oooh! oooh! by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    Mommy, can I dance on that man's grave? Can I? Can I? Pweeease!

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  127. I'll miss him. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    He was my second-favorite Freakazoid guest star, after Norm Abram. (No, really. Look it up.)

  128. Forgiven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of us are Christians. We are forgiven our sins against our creator for no reason at all.

    Actually there is a very BIG reason. It's because the Son of God Himself paid for our sins for us, out of love.

    1. Re:Forgiven by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Well why did he stop? I mean, I have no problem paying for my own sins, but a good night out can get a little pricey and if there's someone willing to pick up the tab out of love then I'd like his card.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
  129. Ding Dong the Wicked Jack is Dead... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 0

    Ding Dong the Jack is Dead
    Which Jack?
    The Wicked Jack!
    Ding Dong the Wicked Jack is Dead

    Ding Dong the Jack is Dead
    Which Jack?
    The Wicked Jack!
    Ding Dong the Wicked Jack is Dead

    One jerk down, several million employees and shareholders to go. If we did have a blood bath that would be unrivaled, even in the Soviet purges, we would finally be able to start creating IP without worrying about the IP maffia. We would finally be able to create the future, instead of living in the feudalism of the past. Of course, that would mean the deaths of every employee (current and former) and every stock holder (current and former) of every member company in the RIAA, MPAA, and BSA. I don't think we have the balls to do it.

    Andy Out!

  130. Re:Good ?? by endianx · · Score: 1

    Okay, we all hate the guy, or at least what the guy stood for: money. It isn't money itself that people on Slashdot hate. Just the idea of someone having more than them.

    The guy is dead. No need to be disrespectful of a dead guy. Don't send flowers, that's fine. But no need to piss yourself over it. I agree. You can be happy about the loss to the MPAA without being happy about his death. Just be happy he can't do any more damage and leave it at that.
  131. Was he Strangled by a VCR? by Maximalist · · Score: 1

    ... in Boston?

  132. Rot in hell you F-cken bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope its hot where you are docuhebag

  133. Epitaph by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Jack Valenti: The VCR finally killed me. You bastards.

  134. HOLY SHIT by prelelat · · Score: 1

    I totally agree, all I can think when I read most of these comments is HOLY SHIT. I mean most of these people on here commenting don't even know who Jack Valenti is. The ones that do shouldn't be talking smack about him either. Not because hes dead but for the fact that they didn't know the person. When someone dies you pay your respects, ALWAYS. You will see the hero, or villian in a story will always pay respects to his apponent. The way people on here are commenting it seems as though everyone is a 10 year old. I've seen a few posts where people have been honest. The guy isn't well liked among those on slashdot. I will conceed to that, but for some of these posts to say evil died today, blah blah blah piss on him blah blah blah hes going to hell. Its just rude and uncalled for.

    You can say you don't like the guy, that you never agreed with his opinions and say your glad his influence is no longer there. But follow it up with RIP or condolences to his family, because even if we don't like him someone else probably did. It makes us look like assholes to them if we don't show the respect that everyone deserves when they pass, especially someone who was so influential.

    1. Re:HOLY SHIT by Surt · · Score: 1

      I found most of the comments in this article uninteresting, but yours fascinates me. What the heck are you reading?
      Read any of the classics with a villian. At one end of literary history, read anything by Homer, at the other, many folks here might be familiar with Tolkien. What do they have in common? Wild, glorious celebrations at the death of their opponents, particularly the evil ones.
      Heck, even Valenti's own world produced Star Wars. What do the gentle teddy bears do when the emperor (and his minions) is finally killed? They throw a wild party.

      So out of curiosity, what the heck are you reading where everyone always pays respects to their opponent, particularly one they think is actually evil?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:HOLY SHIT by prelelat · · Score: 1

      I was thinking in particular with batman. Besides celebrating someones death isn't nessasrily bad. Its the I'll piss on his grave and stuff like that. Hell the irish when someone dies have a big party(when its a close friend). I have read Homer and Tolkien most of the time they arn't being disrespectful when celebrating, I believe in tolkiens they are celebrating freedom and honoring the victors, not trying to piss on the enemy. Who at one time was a great and wise man.

    3. Re:HOLY SHIT by jafac · · Score: 1

      You will see the hero, or villian in a story will always pay respects to his apponent.

      No quarter asked.

      None given.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:HOLY SHIT by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Heck, even Valenti's own world produced Star Wars. What do the gentle teddy bears do when the emperor (and his minions) is finally killed? They throw a wild party. Do the Ewoks shout curses at the emporor's corpse? No, they celebrate their newfound freedom. They celebrate the defeat of a common enemy. They don't spew vitriol at the death of one single minion.
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  135. Vigo the Butch by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    "he was to be hanged, cut down whilst still alive...and his bowels torn out -- Louis Allen"
    Ouch!
    And dig this, there was a prophecy. Just before his head died, his last words were, "Death is but a door. Time is but a window. I'll be back."
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  136. Autocracy vs Democracy by Khammurabi · · Score: 1

    It is a problem, because in a lot of these people's minds there is no moral difference between the two systems. In other words, they live by the patterns they learned in the dictatorship, while enjoying the benefits of a democracy.
    The success of a democracy depends upon the vigor of the people who must live under it. A democracy will naturally decay into an autocracy borne on the momentum of a politician's natural greed, a wealthy merchant's money, and the indifference of its people. In a lax democracy, the people will say about their leaders, "There's nothing I can do." In an earnest democracy, the people will say about their leaders, "I will do even better."
  137. Hey, Mr. Jack by everphilski · · Score: 1

    sounds like an excellent poll, I'd be interested in the results

  138. Oh stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but I respect human life even more."

    Great, because if you respect human life, you respect that Jack lived to a ripe old age and died of natural causes.

    No one caused it, and you can respect "life" all you want, but Jack is dead. He did no good for the average person (quite the opposite), and so the fact that people are glad he's dead? So what. That didn't shorten his stay on this mortal coil for even a minute.

    Get over yourself, really.

  139. Sociopath by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    Showing compassion for the death of another is hardly sociopathic, nor antisocial. Some of the things Valenti lobbied for, on the other hand...

    1. Re:Sociopath by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word [sociopath]. I do not think it means what you think it means. What do you think I think it means?

      I think it means, for example, anyone who thinks that screwing over society for personal gain is something that should be applauded.

      I've used that term solely to refer to people who've made the argument, "hey, don't blame *him*, he's just using the system to his greatest advantage! The consequences of his actions have absolutely no bearing since he did it fully within the law".

      In other words, extreme selfishness without any regard whatsoever for the effects on others. I can hardly think of a *better* word for that than sociopath. Any ideas?

      And to pre-empt any nonsense replies, no I don't think people should not strive to make money or that they should sacrifice themselves for the collective. I'm just saying that causality must be honored. If someone makes a fortune providing a product or service to the benefit of others, hooray. If they make a fortune harming others (who do not themselves deserve it), then for shame, whether it's legal or not, for shame.
  140. Billionaires for Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spielberg - In a sometimes unreasonable business, Jack Valenti was a giant voice of reason

    Iger - A man of great intelligence, integrity and humor

    More tributes

    Do these gazillionaires know of an entirely different Jack Valenti ? Someone genuinely benign, kind, funny ? I wonder.

  141. You forgot... by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...smothered in hot grits.

    $%*&^*^#^!@!# (CONNECTION LOST)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:You forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > ...smothered in hot grits.
      >
      > $%*&^*^#^!@!# (CONNECTION LOST)

      We apologize again for the cliches. Those responsible for sacking those who posted the cliches, have themselves, been sacked.

      The thread has been completed in an entirely different style at great expense and at the last minute, by 40 specially-trained Ecuadorian mountain llamas, 6 Venezuelan red Llamas, 142 Mexican whooping llamas, 14 North Chilean guanacos (closely related to the Llama), CmdrLlama of Brixton, 76000 battery llamas from "Llama-Fresh" Farms Ltd. near Paraguay, and Hemos Gilliam and Zonk Jones.

  142. If cloning were available by Steeltalon · · Score: 1

    I'd bet that he'd have been the first to make an illegal copy of himself

    --
    Regards, Ian
  143. Not everyone qualifies as a Gentleman by abb3w · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this man wasn't exactly our mascot, but can we please not celebrate the death of another human being? I'm not asking for a moment of silence or anything. I'm just saying that the man deserves some dignity. He was misguided, at least, but he was a human being.

    I'm sorry if this comes as a surprise to you, but many of us on Slashdot are assholes, and honest enough to admit it to ourselves. Furthermore, to paraphrase Ecclesiastes, there is a time and place for everything. I trust no-one here would disturb the mourners at the funeral, but for geeks everywhere, the end of his life merits at least a sigh of relief, and Slashdot is as ideal a forum for such as may be found.

    Yes, a human being is dead. He doubtless had personal friends and family, and I feel some pity for the sense of loss they now experience. Losing someone is never easy. On the other hand, I never encountered the man in person. Instead, I encounter the DMCA he championed, the copyright extensions he supported, and the diminishing recognition of the "fair use" he disbelieved in. For those who interacted him as human being, feel free to mourn. For those who love humanity for its own sake, his life was long and rich, and with less to mourn in its ending than thousands who die each day across the face of the world. But for those of us who have only interacted with his legacy as a tool of corporate power, some may choose to celebrate, for having outlived the man, we have a better hope of outliving his ideas.

    On the other hand, his ideas are thriving, so there's not all that much to celebrate. Ding, dong, the witch is dead... now, get back to work . There's still a DMCA.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  144. Didn't learn from his mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1982, Valenti said, "I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone." And then the home video market the VCR created ultimately came to be the mainstay of movie studio revenues throughout the 80s and 90s. In spite of his earlier evil that proved to be baseless, he lobbied for the DMCA in 1998 stealing our freedom. Good riddance!

  145. Miranda says it all by tacokill · · Score: 1

    "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can, and will, be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to legal representation and if you can not afford legal representation, an attorney will be provided for you."

    Seems pretty clear cut to me.

    And I know, at least in Okla, this is true. Many of my friends do pro-bono work for the indigent that are accused of crimes. I suspect it is the same everywhere and I don't think I understand what you are saying when you claim that "nothing is free in the US legal system". If you, truly, can not pay for an attorney, then you have one assigned to you from the public defenders office. This is SOP for any criminal court in the land.

    Now, civil trials are a whole different matter. There is no such right to representation in civil cases so perhaps that is what you are speaking of.

  146. The MPAA Got 'IM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Some people might think he died because he was 85. Rather it was his association with the MPAA / RIAA. Wicked living will do it to you every time.

  147. Let me just say..... by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Fuck him.

    Yes, he's a person and a human being. But that does not account for his deeds while he was living.

    Fuck him and the horse he rode in on. I hope he rots in hell. (and yes, I know this is mean-spirited, but hey Jack - tit for tat)

  148. What is wrong with that? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    We all die, dying shouldn't be treated with such stupid reverence.

    A person like this individual, whose life's work was to destroy the US cultural heritage, and by extension, the cultural heritage of the rest of humanity, only deserves our utter contempt and a sigh of relief knowing he is not around with us anymore to continue spreading his venom.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  149. Global cultural heritage is one very serious issue by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Otherwise record labels and movie companies would not invest the amounts of money they do in order to try to control it.

    In such an important issue it is to be celebrated that such a hated figure goes away. Good riddance, shame there is no god that would punish him for his unethical, quasi criminal, activities.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  150. The system, the system. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    What about if the system is broken pal?

    Should we celebrate the lifes of those that perpetuate it?

    This guy clearly was no mass murderer, but frankly I feel nothing but contempt for him, you have no right to dictate to others how they feel about such a despicable character's demise.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  151. No wonder lobbysts are so successful. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If the technologically inclined can't differentiate the real issue, what hope is there for the common people or even the well intentioned politician?

    This individual, and the industry he represents, subverted by means of political lobbying and support of dubious technology, the intention and spirit of US law in regards to copyright.

    And before you dismiss copyright issues as minor in the great scheme of things you should reflect that the US founders considered of such high importance that they worked on legislation to regulate it.

    They understood copyright is the basis of an elnightened society, unfortunately they reached the worn conclussions, but Valenti and his ilk do not respect even that flawed version of copyright.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  152. No one was in baseball caps, either. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > the famous photo aboard Air Force One

    Its interesting to note Johnson didn't need to take the oath -- he was already president. Upon the president's death, the vp shall become president. End of story.

    However, Johnson felt it was important for national continuity to do it anyway.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  153. Welcome to the global village. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Where not in all cultures it is considered bad manners to celebrate the departure of an unethical individual.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  154. Slashdot family deserves simple buriel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One may complain that we demonize the man because he took away something as trivial as movies. This is not true. We demonize the man because, for something as trivial as movies, he was willing to take away our freedom."

    Sounds nice except for the fact that in slashdot's case most of those freedoms aren't based on facts but some quasi-fantasy world which was demonstrated in the first interview we had with NewYorkLawyer. Demonizing a person based on ignorance is nothing to be proud about.

  155. Oh yeah, great. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Lets celebrate people with beliefs, no matter how misguided and harmful they are.

    You must be joking.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Oh yeah, great. by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      Thanks be the pasta be with you and your and your family.

  156. Naive Folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If we want them to stop, we gotta make their life miserable, not their death."

    I recommend cranking up our geo-content-hiding P2P clients to maximumn from the safety of our basements, because we all know that'll hurt them. No sir none of that "But I'm not hurting anyone, but" or "free advertising", or even "try then buy" nonsense. Hurt 'em while we can. Jumping up and down and yelling a lot on slashdot will certainly bend the world to our whims and have the MPAA/RIAA/Book publishers/Steam/etc, etc, etc cringing in fear.

    1. Re:Naive Folks? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope. Neither picketing their sales points nor shouting at them 'til we're blue will change a thing.

      Not buying their overpriced crap will. Businesses are dependent on our money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  157. Stop it right there pal. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    One thing is to celebrate the departure of some person that has made so much damage (and you should pause to think how much damage has been inflicted by the amount and strength of dislike for this man) and another one is to be a potential murderer.

    Your jump of logic is so idiotic and monumental that begs belief.

    Asking to the victims of this individual's actions to show some class is frankly too much to ask, and frankly it is not up to you, who was obviously not affected by this man's actions, to do the asking.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  158. give the man -some- rest ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    He's dead now, he did bad things when he was alive; some guys really think trolling on him will change those facts?

    NO

    If he'd be alive; ok; you can hammer on him because it -might- change something, but will it change something now?

    NO

    He's still human; is it human to be judge, jury and executioner on someone who should be resting in peace by now?

    NO!

    Maybe show some decency for the deceased and their family?

    Pretty please sugar on top?
    It's easier to hate someone than loving and caring (okok, I don't expect you to love him) .. but just think about that?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  159. Argh! Moore be damned. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Hitler fought in the 1st World War, I think he even won a medal or something...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Argh! Moore be damned. by The+Iso · · Score: 1
      --
      "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan
  160. dignity and respect is far to find by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Too bad this rule of "Respecting the life of others as you expect them to respect yours" is not so common among people (anymore) (trampling on the lives of others for the sake of their own good) ....

    It's a standard I live by; do not harm any, do not hurt intentionally, do not bring any in danger and respect anyone as much as you would expect yourself; which is not really seen as a "good value" anymore but rather as a nuisance for most. Which bothers me the most is that some people think they are perfect while they make that error day by day...

    Still it feels good to meet/see people who think (and surely FEEL) similar with such dignity and respect;
    it makes me not feel alone on this world where money is the A-factor instead of humanity ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  161. If Jack Valenti **is** in hell right now... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1


    ...He's sitting in front of a DVD juke box filled with all of his favorite films...

    ...but the player is stuck on the FBI warning message...

    ...for the next ten thousand years.

    RIP Jack.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  162. Re:Global cultural heritage is one very serious is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you know that admission to heaven has nothing to do with your actions during your life? One need only believe and worship to be admitted.

  163. And guess who pipes up by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

    Hilary Rosen, for MSNBC's Hardblogger http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/ site, covering the recent debate, and inserts her "Ode to Jack Valenti" http://hardblogger.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/04/2 6/170130.aspx. "Clown following the lion tamer," indeed.

  164. KH Alert by dedazo · · Score: 1
    C'mon, you know he's just karma whoring. The whole post screams "MOD ME UP PLZ"

    Really, I mean "I have not won anything but hope."?? Give me a break...

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  165. RIP, Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roast In Purgatory

  166. Party at valenti's Grave, BYOB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, the point is that I disagree with him, but I certainly don't think the issues at stake are serious enough to CELEBRATE HIS DEATH over.


    Selling out our basic rights for coporate profits? I'd say that is pretty scummy. People have fought, bled and died for the past several hundred years for the rights and liberties that you and I enjoy. Then along comes a corporate whore who works to undercut those rights from within, all in the name of insuring the all mighty dollar for coporate profits.

    Burn in hell, Valenti.

  167. OSS WW2 actions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some relate stories of his actions with Italian partisan fighters, doing "black op" type off-the-books absolutely anything goes guerrilla actions during World War 2, with him working with the OSS.

    Of course, it was the OSS that (blending with forgiven Nazi elements) became the CIA after the War.

    He also was said to have ridden just a few cars behind JFK in Dallas on the day he was shot. Given his position there as an observer, and the admitted use of Italian hitters in the triangulated fire, there's quite a solid chance (seriously) that Valenti was the coordinator of JFK's killing.

    Then, from this, LBJ creates a never-exited-before nothing job as reward.

  168. Very many, in China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Do you actually know of a single case anywhere of a murder committed by an atheist because the victim believed in god?

    Stalin's purges killed more than a few such people. You can find similar examples in China, especially modern China, where an unregistered house church will get you disappeared.

  169. Missing the point by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    It isn't about Britney Spears.

    It's about the police state that Jack Valenti helped sire upon this country - "trusted" computing where your computer isn't yours to control; copy protections that prevent you from backing up your DVDs which leaves you vulnerable to your kid turning your precious movie into a PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME! coaster; higher punishments for copying a DVD than stealing a car; ill fated legislation to let the MPAA crash your hard drive if they think you're pirating stuff... and so on.

    Yes, historically, people have been hung... hanged... guillotined... shot... made to walk the plank... for waging this kind of police state war on our freedoms.

    It's a shame this man grew old and fell into his grave and left behind a legacy of nothing short of pure corporate statist tyranny for the rest of us to get out from under.

    May your chains set lightly.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  170. He created that atitude. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Valenti may have just fallen in with the wrong people after his service; he may have been raised by parents who chided him for "stealing ideas", etc.

    It impossible to find the phrase "stealing ideas" in print before 30 years ago. This is a concept created and propagated by people like Valenti. I can only hope that bad idea goes with him.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  171. pilot in WW2 by alizard · · Score: 1

    For the Germans, or for the Japanese? Odd, I would have figured that the only job he'd be able to hold down in a military would be concentration camp guard.

    1. Re:pilot in WW2 by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

      For the Americans.

      Don't ask a question if you're not ready for the answer.

  172. Miranda says it all-Contingency. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now, civil trials are a whole different matter. There is no such right to representation in civil cases so perhaps that is what you are speaking of."

    While true, one can still get an attorney on contingency. I've done it twice in civil court, and I believe NewYorkLawyer does MPAA/RIAA cases as well.

  173. Valenti embraced the Creative Commons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think anyone will see this post, as this news item is off the front page, but i think it's important for history that it be noted that Jack Valenti did embrace Laurence Lessig's Creative Commons and the idea that people who expressly wanted their creative output to be freely shared should have the right to do so.

  174. Copyright = forever+ 1 day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like old Jack didn't last forever + a day.

  175. Another Dictator bites the dust!!! by GowFlang · · Score: 1

    I do not know this man personally, but from his actions I can pretty much guess the type of person he was. Obviously he does not have a good rapport with the common people, especially those whom his company has sued over alleged copyright violations or the heavy handed tactics in which he crafted by coercing the justice system to go against the citizens individual rights and privacy. These actions alone tell me that Jack Valenti is a man who will do anything in his power to get his way. A Characteristic that is similar to a megalomaniac. If more people like him were to just disappear and not exist, this world would be a nirvana, but unfortunately there are people like Jack Valenti and many of his ilks are in power and still alive today.

  176. Re:Global cultural heritage is one very serious is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Wesley (7th paragraph from linked location) and Emmanuel Swedenborg beg to differ. Also: James chapter 20 is all about that.

  177. If you aren't an MPAA shill by alizard · · Score: 1

    how are you so well acquainted with Valenti's personal bio?

    1. Re:If you aren't an MPAA shill by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

      Try reading through previous comments on this article, and comprehending them - that's where I found out about his WWII service, and when I decided to look into it. I know very little about his past other than his job with the MPAA, his service during WWII, and his closeness to the Kennedy and Johnson administrations.

      So sure, maybe he's done tons more evil things other than what he's done for the MPAA. That doesn't change my point. Hate him all you want - sure, be glad that he's dead - but that's no reason to make some of the downright disgusting remarks made about him on /. the day after his death.

  178. too bad this is modded troll .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I really find it too bad almost the entire thread is modded troll because of another perspective on society.

    To my opinion this wasn't trolling but rather honesty being discussed; which is for sure one of the most valuable things which -can- happen to /. as social-interacting factor. Atleast mod them parents off-topic but trolling??

    Such topic could be opened more to see how people -do really- think and react about such matters instead of just ignoring them; it's a rather interesting topic which others feel "bad" about while it's the most normal reaction or thing to do at that moment for some...

    end of rant..

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  179. I am Jack's complete lack of comprehension. by Geminii · · Score: 1

    As per his last wishes, Jack's soul was encoded with DRM. Unfortunately, he failed to realise that there is no DRM in Heaven...