Slashdot Mirror


Wii 'Popularity Bubble' to Burst?

A combination of industry and developer observations has prompted Tech.co.uk to wonder if the Wii's overwhelming popularity is due to end sometime soon. This is based on a report from Japanese business newspaper The Nikkei, which published an article recently entitled 'Software Houses Miscalculate Audience, Demand For Wii'. "The report goes on to discuss the likelihood that many Wiis are gathering dust in owners' cupboards, citing one software house president as saying, 'People bought it out of curiosity, and it's likely a lot of them haven't used it.' Given that September saw Wii sales fall sharply in Japan for the second consecutive month, it seems reasonable to speculate that the bubble inflated by the novelty factor is starting to deflate, but writing Nintendo off at any stage is a perilous course to steer." Is this just worrying, or is there validity to this?

426 comments

  1. Nintendo's new motto: by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Wii are bored".

    1. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by woohoodonuts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bored and worried about saving for Christmas, would be more correct. While I'm still excited about the wii, I'm also sitting around waiting for the new mario Galaxy game to be released. I finished beating Zelda, never was too fond of 1st person shooters (Metroid Prime) and so am left with a small gap until the holiday season allows my game spending budget to pick up another game or two. Since I only buy a few games a year, I don't take changes. When Brawl and Galaxy come out, I'll buy. Since Nintendo has cultivated a mostly Non-hardcore gamer market, the majority of their customers are only going to buy the AAA titles because that's what they hear about in the media. Most of those will be released in the coming months.

    2. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      as far as fps's go I wouldn't throw metriod prime 3 into that category, it's really much closer to zelda TP IMO

    3. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by JoshJ · · Score: 1, Informative

      Metroid Prime 3 isn't really a FPS. It's more of a first-person Zelda game, with less well-defined "dungeons" (there's a lot of backtracking, needing items from THIS planet in order to do stuff on THAT planet, etc); it just happens to have a FPS viewpoint+combat system.

    4. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by NoTheory · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then what on earth do you mean by FPS, if it doesn't mean "a game with a first person perspective, in which one's primary interface with the world is, in fact, shooting"? Sure Metroid isn't Doom, it's not Quake, nor is it Halo[1..3]. So you actually have objectives, and have to, god forbid, explore. So what? Does that disqualify it as an FPS?

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    5. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its first person perspective, and you shoot stuff constantly. That makes it an FPS. It has puzzle elements added, but its still an FPS.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by orclevegam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some purists might argue that it does. The main point of the Prime series (and all Metroid series really) was to explore and find power-ups that allowed you to get farther into the "dungeons". In contrast the primary goal of most FPS games is to make it from point A to point B by killing or otherwise eliminating anything that gets in your way, possibly with conditions attached such as ensuring that some object is either protected or destroyed. I think one of the key features that sets Prime apart from other more traditional FPS titles is the need to use the various Visors and jump upgrades which effectively make the game play closer to a platformer such as Mario Sunshine. The fairly constant switch to third person when performing certain jumps and using the morph ball also serves to distance Prime from a FPS.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    7. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by plague3106 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heh.. I know I am still waiting for games I'm interested in. For now though, I've been picking up gamecube games to hold me over. The Wii is a great game system, its just that game studios didn't think it would take off, so most of the games are the Mario varity.

      That said, it looks like some good ones are coming up; manhunt, tomb raider: aniv., RE: chronicals, etc. hopefully RE: 5 will appear on the wii as well.

    8. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not a first person shooter if it doesn't include multiplayer. Metroid Prime is a first person adventure.

    9. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by mahdi13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First time I played Zelda TP I couldn't stop thinking how much it was like Metroid Prime except in third person...

      That's really the only difference other then story between them. Weapon upgrades, new items to access new locations you couldn't get to before, beat a big boss to get new items/power ups. I know lots of anti-FPS people that love Metriod Prime because it's more of a platformer then a shooter.
      And constantly shooting at things is a terrible argument, ever play Xevious? That wasn't first person

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    10. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by vandon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Wii are bored".


      Plenty of Wiis are in homes, but no one is making any games for them. They all seem to have bet on the wrong company and are stuck in exclusivity contracts with Sony and their console that just won't sell.
    11. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're an idiot. Metroid Prime is played with a first person perspective. Metroid Prime also features shooting. That makes it a first person shooter. Neither alone does, and the GP didn't say so.

    12. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Stregone · · Score: 1

      The metroid prime gameplay formula is very similar to the 3d zelda gameplay. Its almost zelda in space.

    13. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Bob-taro · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... The main point of the Prime series (and all Metroid series really) was to explore and find power-ups that allowed you to get farther into the "dungeons" ... one of the key features that sets Prime apart from other more traditional FPS titles is the need to use the various Visors and jump upgrades which effectively make the game play closer to a platformer such as Mario Sunshine. The fairly constant switch to third person when performing certain jumps and using the morph ball also serves to distance Prime from a FPS.

      So I guess to the purists Half Life 2 isn't a FPS because there are physics puzzles. And Doom wasn't a FPS because you needed to navigate "dungeons" and find and use keys. Halo isn't a FPS because of all the 3rd person cutscenes.

      Now, I'm being a bit of a hypocrite because I don't personally feel like it's a REAL fps unless you have a keyboard and mouse (I never got into consoles), but logically, if it's mostly first person and mostly shooting, I think you pretty much have to put it in the FPS category, even if it does overlap with other genres a bit.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    14. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Well, I would call it a FPS myself, or perhaps more accurately and Adventure FPS. Half Life 2 does start to tread into less FPSish territory with some of the puzzles, but on the whole they were such a minor portion of the game that it didn't really matter. As for Halo, a cut scene is different from actually controlling a character in third person. I would argue though that Prime is more adventure than it is FPS, so rather than being an FPS with a few adventure elements like Half Life 2, it's more like a Platformer/Adventure game with FPS elements.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    15. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      No online Multiplayer. We know that the Wii has wifi built in but Nintendo's a bunch of pussies and won't let johhny get tainted by online smack talk. Metroid Prime=Faux FPS - or crippleware. Take your pick.

    16. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...except it's also a FPS.

    17. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Saint_Waldo · · Score: 1

      I thought the ideologically correct form of Sony bashing was to point out the exclusives they've lost to Wii/360. Funny how the worm turns in a holy warrior's head.

    18. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by spence2680 · · Score: 1

      I just bought a wii in August after playing Mario Party 8 at a friends house. So far I have the wii, MP8, some sports game pack and thats it. Honestly, there's nothing else I want to play on it. The only game I'm looking forward to is Super Smash Bro's. Nintendo needs to work to get more games on this system. Otherwise my wii will continue to collect dust.

    19. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by edwdig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Morrowind is a first person game that also features shooting. But it's an RPG, not an FPS.

    20. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by metroid+composite · · Score: 1

      I've seen a classification system that works something like the following:

      Metroid:
      Action/Adventure > 2D

      Megaman:
      Action > 2D

      ---
      By extension we can say:

      Zelda, Ocarena of Time:
      Action/Adventure > Third Person

      Gears of War:
      Action > Third Person

      ---
      And of course:

      Metroid Prime:
      Action/Adventure > First Person

      DOOM:
      Action > First Person

      Portal:
      Puzzle > First Person

      Oblivion:
      RPG > First Person

      Now, sure, you could classify every game with a first person camera and a projectile as a first person shooter. (I even have friends with that kind of opinion on Oblivion). However I much prefer to classify games primarily under what I'm doing (Twitch, Exploration, Thinking) rather than what I'm seeing (side view, rear view, first person view).

    21. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by edwdig · · Score: 1

      logically, if it's mostly first person and mostly shooting, I think you pretty much have to put it in the FPS category, even if it does overlap with other genres a bit.

      But that's the thing. Metroid Prime isn't mostly shooting. It's exploring with a little shooting thrown in. You can constantly shoot if you want to, but there's little reason to.

    22. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh, you're right. Doom must not have been an FPS!

      Oh wait. No, you're a dumbass.

    23. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Bioshock isn't an FPS.

      Go put your helmet back on.

    24. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I have had a Wii since shortly after launch. I also have a Gamecube, PS2 and an XBox 360. For quite some time now even the Gamecube and PS2 get more use than the Wii. If it were to break I would not go through the trouble of even sending it in to get repaired for free. Its not that its a horrible system. Its not. But after the novelty of it wears off there is just no care from me or my kids about the system at all.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    25. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was very well said. The Metroid Prime games are no more "first person shooters" than the original games were "shooters". The core combat mechanic is shooting, but the games focus much more on exploration and puzzle solving. They are "adventure" games in the same vein as The Legend of Zelda, only with a sci-fi theme. The Prime games are essentially "first person adventures". (FPAs?)

    26. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell me about it - I owned a Wii pretty much as soon as they arrived in the UK - bought a bunch of games, and realized I only liked Wii sports. Zelda - got bored after about 20 minutes of wandering around a dull village with a horse. Tiger Woods golf - one round was enough. Then I bought a PS3 with Resistance Fall of Man - played that all the way through - great! In fact, I didn't play the Wii again after buying the PS3 (after playing games in High-def, you don't want to go back to 480p!) I sold the Wii with all the games, plus extra controllers, store credits etc for 120 pounds, just glad to get rid of it. Yeah, the wiimote is a great controller, but the system's hardware is very "last gen", and the games are just, well, shallow...

    27. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by JWW · · Score: 1

      You got that right. This whole story is about game companies rationalizing how they miscalculated the popularity of the Wii.

    28. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the new one, but the original Metroid Prime isn't much of a shooter at all. But somehow I doubt that you have played it.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    29. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Mobkey · · Score: 1

      I haven't played my Wii in a long time. In fact my sister has it. Of course I bought Halo 3 and have barely touched that. Apparently I'm just addicted to WoW. Go me.

    30. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Tikkun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just want some wanton violence, blood, gore, robots, lasers, possibly sharks and the ability to prove to other people online that I have spent more time than them playing a video game.

      Is that too much to ask?

    31. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by m2943 · · Score: 1

      I think you're misjudging the difference between FPS and exploring. FPS may look like it's just about raw fire power and reaction times and it may let you make it through a level on speed alone. But to get good at a level requires figuring out precise sequences of moves, power-ups, etc. For many levels in an FPS, the difference between brute force and understanding a level is between barely making it through and making it through without getting wounded at all.

    32. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      And it also features roles and playing so it's an RPG too! And it has platforms, that makes it a platformer! There's fighting so surely it's a fighting game? You go through an adventure and it has pointing and clicking so it's a point&click adventure too!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    33. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wii just needs good games!

      Oh, wait, just more of the same coming? :/

    34. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with Wii-games, this far anyway, is their "Wow, we got to use the controller in a cool way!" mentality.
      I don't like the Wii-mote very much and would like to be able to play most games using the GC-controller instead.
      Is that an option? Mostly, no. Thus I don't play most Wii-games for more than maybe an hour or so before tiering of the damn mote.
      It's a nice idea as a secondary, voluntary type of controller in some games, but as a main, obligatory controller it sucks.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    35. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Wanna sell it? I'm 100% serious.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    36. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      So you stop playing a 40 hour, 60€ game because the intro level took longer than 20 minutes? Man, I wish I had that much money to burn.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    37. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by coolGuyZak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Wii is a great game system, its just that game studios didn't think it would take off, so most of the games are the Mario varity.

      <rant>

      I believe that even after game producers remove their collective heads from their asses that the Wii is still destined to fail, for two reasons. First and foremost, we have well-established, risk-averse publishers. The big houses have found a niche that they know will sell sans innovation (think "pop-gaming"). Why experiment with the Wii's controller when the graphics fall far short of Advanced Console Theta? When we can co-brand games with other mass-media? When our development staff knows nothing beyond button mashing? Why experiment when we can repeat the mold with guaranteed profit?

      Initially the WiiMote was hyped to break the mold. It could bring 1992's VR hype (see: the evil Sys Admin in hackers) to the masses! Look at the market, though. Developers approach the WiiMote superficially, grafting functionality onto their games instead of incorporating it into the experience. Face it: most games treat the Wiimote as a gimmick. What's worse, consumers are beginning to hold the same belief as developers--the only thing the WiiMote is good for is gimmick after gimmick. That's why this console, for all of its potential, is withering on the branch. It could be said that the market lacks an "entrepreneurial spirit"--the vision of change, and the inclination to do it.

      So, where are the entrepreneurs? Written out of Nintendo's business strategy, it seems. Nintendo caters solely to the massive, stagnating atmosphere of the past 5 or so years. In a seemingly schizophrenic move, Nintendo priced the Wii development kit at $2000, but they refuse to license it to anyone without prior success in the market. WTF? Likewise, Nintendo built an innovate console, but they didn't innovate their market for content. Presenting a novel platform to a stagnant environment accomplishes nothing except stagnating the platform. That's why Wii games are, and will continue to be, the same, lifeless crap as on every other system.

      If Nintendo wants their 'Revolution' to be successful, they must dedicate themselves to the cause. They should encourage variety and competition. Likewise, the developers who play the "Wii Game" should have an "innovate, or die" mentality.

      Why? More innovation forces developers to investigate every nook and cranny of the system, to push it beyond what the console developers originally expected. Leave no feature unexamined, because that could give your competitor an edge.

      How do you accomplish this? Invite new players--entrepreneurs-- with new projects and new ideas to the market. Entrepreneurs don't have the opportunity to rest on their laurels, because that bed of flowers hasn't been made. Their incentive is intrinsic to their goal. in addition they may force the big players to shift as well.

      And if the big guys don't shift? So what? The new developers provide your content.

      Companies like Microsoft encourage this form of development. They give away an XBox360 development kit (XNA Game Studio), and XBox Live gives indie game developers a market for their games. XBox Live flourishes (even if it flourishes with crap), while the Wii Shopping Channel rots. Furthermore, every developer tied to MS is one less available for Nintendo. Their "potential content network" dwindles daily.

      As a budding entrepreneur who is highly interested in game development--particularly on the Wii--I'm pissed they're excluding me. But what really pisses me off is knowing that, when I finally make my case for the Wii, the market may have passed it by for Game Iteration X++ only on Advanced Console Theta.

      </rant>

    38. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by bint · · Score: 1

      So Zelda is a third person shooter? Write a report about it, and don't forget the cover sheet. ;)

    39. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by DeeDob · · Score: 1

      Yes it actually does.

      The Metroid Prime series is a series of exploration. Yes you also shoot things in it.

      See it like a first person Tomb Raider (even though a less linear one). In Tomb Raider, you shoot things constantly, yet they arn't "shooters". They are exploration and puzzle solving games that includes shooting and that plays in the 3rd person. They arn't third person shooters. They are classified as "action/adventure".

      See there are TONS of descriptives for games played in the third person:
      - platformers,
      - shooters,
      - adventures,
      - puzzles,
      - etc.

      However, there are only about one really known for 1st person:
      - shooter.

      Well, 1st person games can be of the same kinds than 3rd person.
      Portal is puzzle,
      Metroid is adventure,

      sadly, there arn't much more but for the oddball 1st person game...

    40. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by trbofly · · Score: 1

      Your sister has your Wii? Gross.

    41. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by slater86 · · Score: 1

      I just wish that more quality games would get released from non nintendo distributers(the nintendo ones are fine). Wii sports is still great even though it was just the bundled promo, mainly because it was deliberately written to show every aspect of the controller. most of the non nintendo games feel entirely too ported and don't make use of the controller abilities.
      call of duty in particular feels like the gun sight is a analog joystick thats been poorly hacked to work with the controller as a last minute thought.

      --
      When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
    42. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by LKM · · Score: 1

      Halo is to Prime as Contra is to Metroid. Metroid is a FPS in that it's First Person and you can Shoot, but it isn't a FPS in the same way that Zelda isn't a Third Person Shooter, but an Action-Adventure.

    43. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by EllF · · Score: 1

      Amen. I love deep, complex games - fairly much everything from T.O.M.E to Bioshock is interesting to me.

      I found Twilight Princess abysmal. I got to the lava level, and decided to put the controller down - it's more of the same, there's no characterization to speak of, and the core mechanic doesn't feel rewarding. Getting some item that will let me kill one very specific monster after working through an overly long, dull dungeon, just so I can watch more non-interactive scenery zip past for an hour before I do it again?

      No thanks. Give me some character development, flexibility, and plot - or at least something entertaining to do.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    44. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      I finished beating Zelda, never was too fond of 1st person shooters (Metroid Prime)

      If someone you know has Metroid Prime 3, give it a spin. I loaned my copy to a friend who never got into FPS's, but is now intent on beating it. It is REALLY good, and they fixed the lingering issues of the other Metroid Prime games (there's still back tracking, but it wouldn't be a Metroid/or Zelda/ or Castlevania without it). Also RE4 and The Godfather for Wii are the best versions of those games, and for me Tiger Woods 08 controls well, and has near infinite replayability.

    45. Re:Nintendo's new motto: by thadman08 · · Score: 1

      You do know that you can play Gamecube games on your Wii, right?

      That'd keep the dust off of it.

  2. Redirect shipments... by JayDot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    from Japan to the US. I still can't get one in a major metro area of WI. And I can see at least 5 games that I want to play.

    --
    Meh, a real sig would take too long, and I have an MMORPG to play with....
    1. Re:Redirect shipments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news: Wisconsin has major metro areas

    2. Re:Redirect shipments... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      agreed, the first and only Wii I have ever seen in store was the last one in stock at a Toys 'R Us in someones cart.

      if this is what a burst bubble looks like... damn.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    3. Re:Redirect shipments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Wii will be in short supply for the next few weeks. They have postponed the current orders because they are rolling out a new model to thwart the modchips. They have told the stores that there's a fault in the design of those already being sold, and the new model will be out for the end of October.

      So unless your chosen store has stock right now, it'll be a good couple of weeks before they see new inventory. Of course, there are tons on ebay.

    4. Re:Redirect shipments... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Milwaukee is the 11th largest in the US. Madison is not, but then again I know plenty of people who got Wiis here months ago.

    5. Re:Redirect shipments... by CrabbMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      This does not even matter, but Milwaukee is not the #11 metro area in the states. Not even top 25.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_metropolitan_area

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee,_Wisconsin

      That is, according to wikipedia, so keep the NaCl handy. . .

    6. Re:Redirect shipments... by eviljames · · Score: 1

      I hear that! Popularity bubble bursting? I doubt it. I'm not a hardcore gamer by any stretch, the most recent system I own is N64 - and I don't have windows on any computer in my house so my computer gaming options are somewhat limited. I still can't find a new Wii anywhere, and it is a device that I covet. Send 'em to Canada, my group of non-hardcore-gamers (read: Stoner musicians) will be happy to fork over the money not only to have one each, but also to put one in our jam space.

    7. Re:Redirect shipments... by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other news: Wisconsin has major metro areas

      He was talking about Milwaukee being a major metro area of Chicago. =P

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    8. Re:Redirect shipments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My wife has been trying to get one for months. The store shelves are bare, the store amanger says that they can't keep them in stock, they sell out instantly. And we thought we'd beat he Christmas rush early ...(this is in Austin TX).

    9. Re:Redirect shipments... by hedwards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if the bubble did pop somewhat, the majority of the money in consoles is games anyway. Nintendo makes money with every game sold, whether it be directly or through a license.

      The other bit is that Wiis sitting in closets have nothing to do with new sales. People don't generally buy a second unit unless the previous one is lost, stolen or broken. Just having one sitting around idle.

      At this point, I'd chalk it up to FUD. People may very well be waiting for the holiday season to buy them as well

    10. Re:Redirect shipments... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      I still can't get one in a major metro area of WI.


      I might suggest paying me a visit then. In my area Target has consistently had a good 10 Wii's in the case since the middle of the summer. Walmart has been fairly well stocked up as well. As for other retailers like Best Buy and Circuit City, I haven't been there in a while, but I assume they've all got plenty.

      I just assumed Nintendo has finally ramped up production, but it could certainly be an indication that demand has declined somewhat.
    11. Re:Redirect shipments... by abigor · · Score: 1

      I was in a Future Shop here in North Vancouver the other day and there were a bunch just sitting there. I played with the demo for a bit, but I just can't get past the blocky graphics. No, this is not a troll; I guess I'm just not the target market, which is fine.

    12. Re:Redirect shipments... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at just the cities and not the muti-city metroplexes, it is indeed in the top 25 in terms of populations.

      It is #19 in terms of city proper population.

      http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/most_pop_cities_usa.htm

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    13. Re:Redirect shipments... by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      That is, according to wikipedia, so keep the NaCl handy. . .


      *Nelson pummels CrabbMan*
      --
      +0 Meh
    14. Re:Redirect shipments... by DaTFooLCaSS · · Score: 0

      If you did not know Nintendo has already released a few different Wii's. There are several types of DVD controller chips built into the Wii, known as: DMS, D2A, D2B, and D2C, the D2C chips just been hacked. Also a large majority of consoles equipped with the D2B chips have pins cut off the chip to block the use of modchips.

    15. Re:Redirect shipments... by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 1

      Im in austin tx and i got mine a month ago. i went to best buy asked when next shipment was coming in "next saturday" so i got there right when it opened, didnt camp out like the 8 people already there, and got one of the 50 they had. when i left there were still plenty... oddly enough there was NOT anyone in line waiting to be a xbox360Elite hmm wonder why?

      given the admission of many groups to fail to develop for it initially, its going to take time before they start releasing things. Maybe the graphics arent 1080p and amazing but you know what? they are f'ing good enough. Not everyone has an HD tv anyways. there is more to games than graphics..

      i firmly believe that the singular factor that will really determine wii's success will be 3rd party support. if the 3rd parties get on the wagon the way they did with snes and ps and ps2 then wii can thrive. if it ends up like n64 and gamecube did with minimal 3rd party involvement and no 3rd party BIG NAME MAJOR titles many of the pseudo hard core gamers like myself who were attempting to go less hard core will succumb to our inner gamer, leave the joy that is the wii and end up with something else.

      you'd think more slashdotters would be proWii and proPs3 in any attempt to not support M$... color me surprised

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
    16. Re:Redirect shipments... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Take 'em from Europe, we got too damn many of those things. There's like 80 Wiis piling up on shelves at the local electronics retailer here.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  3. The better question by pthor1231 · · Score: 1, Informative

    is who gives a shit if this so called "Popularity bubble" bursts? Honestly, will anything be different? Will your wii not work anymore?

    1. Re:The better question by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, will anything be different? Well, people who don't have one may actually be able to find one on the shelves...
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:The better question by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      who gives a shit if this so called "Popularity bubble" bursts? Honestly, will anything be different? Will your wii not work anymore?


      No, but if the Wii becomes less popular, there might be fewer third-party games for it.
      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:The better question by obergfellja · · Score: 0

      Wii are saving up money for Wii-nter celebration (christmas, Honnica [sp?], other winter celebrations)

    4. Re:The better question by tbannist · · Score: 1

      If some game companies end up having over-extended themselves banking on big sales for the Wii and they never appear there could be bankrupcies and cancelled games for everyone. Other than that, it's just more games related navel gazing.

      If you expect that to go uncovered... Welcome to Slashdot, you must be new here.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    5. Re:The better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honnica [sp?]

      Hanukkah. Did you even TRY to spell it?
    6. Re:The better question by quanticle · · Score: 0, Troll

      As if there were really any AAA third-party games for the Wii anyway. I don't see anything like Bioshock or Gears of War on the horizon for Nintendo. Its the same as the Gamecube - the AAA titles will be from Nintendo while everyone else will make ports of games from other consoles.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    7. Re:The better question by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1

      1. Gain large userbase
      2. Attract more third party games
      3. ????
      4. Profit

    8. Re:The better question by miller701 · · Score: 1

      Sure right before Kwannzii. I think the humor missed you

    9. Re:The better question by SoCalEd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hope it does mean more availability. Three of my work colleagues have been hunting for one to no avail. Oh yeah: That's an attorney (male, 45 y.o.), an accountant (mid-30's, female) and an IT guy (mid-20's hardcore gamer).

      This little box has a lot of broad appeal. Mine? No dust. Had it since January and still play it 4 or 5 hours a week, but only because I don't have more time. Beat Zelda, finished Paper Mario, almost done with RE4. Metroid is next. Also, I keep coming back to Tiger Woods. But my wife and I honestly get the most replay value out of bowling, billiards and tennis. I'll admit there aren't too many other titles out there I'm itching to play at the moment, but I've got such value out of the ones I've picked (with IGN's help) that I am happy to wait for the pipeline to get going.

      Others have said it, I'll concur: graphics be damned. If the games make you smile, people will line up for them.

      --
      Insert witty comment *here*. I'm fresh out of wit...
    10. Re:The better question by Type-E · · Score: 1

      Your comment isn't that insightful, but I'll digg you for supporting Ron Paul

    11. Re:The better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the Wii will remain popular since it's cometption is not copy the new interface, which for most gamers is more exciting than more polygons a second.

      Face it, we hit the point of having enough eye candy years ago. We are looking at a lack of innovation in game play, game plot and interactivity. Wii proves that by being the least supported and least powerful console, yet the most sold and likely teh most profitible.

      I really don't think there is any popularity bubble since that would suggest the Wii is not sellign on it's own meritts, but if anything I'd have to so that is mostly likely the very opposite.

      The only think the Wii has going is that it's cheap and it's has new interface means. The Wii was not as heavily hyped as the xbox or Ps3, yet it's selling better. I think that more or less proves there is no populairty bubble or market hype driving sales.

      You don't have to like it, you don't have to get one, but face the facts, the Wii is most sold console because it's MORE FUN and that's very important. If you think about it Nintendo already has an edge in making innovative and fun games that don't require high polygon counts.

      Really of the last few console I probably enjoyed the Gamecube and it's few, but enjoyable games. I played the ps2 more, but only because more people owned it and had games for it, oh yea and it was easy to make backups. But, really I think Nintendo has a record of making the most 'fun' consoles and that's a smart way to go about it since the other major consoles are really only focusing on stats with the assumption that innovation is up to the game developers.

      Xbox simply needs to expand it's view to being a full game system/media center with many MANY more add ons. It could easily replace the PC in many homes or at the very least add a second PC to your house for the cost of a game console.

    12. Re:The better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that game development may not be worth it for game companies.

    13. Re:The better question by FreeKill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know I personally really wanted a Wii when it first came out. I attempted to find one for a few months after (3 or so) and when it was still 4-5 months later and there were still none on the shelf, I simply just lost interest. It's one thing to hold back a bit to create demand, it's entirely another to not make sales because you can't meet demand (or you don't want to meet demand to give the illusion of excessive demand). I recently checked at a local store the other day in Toronto (almost a year since it was released) and they still don't have any on the shelf. Pretty lame if you ask me, they definitely lost at least one sale there with me...

    14. Re:The better question by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Correct, it does not get PC ports.

      I'd chalk that up as a good thing though, personally.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    15. Re:The better question by svunt · · Score: 1

      A lot like me, I still play a bit of Madden now and again, but it's the simple stuff that makes the console...I rarely have anyone over to my place who doesn't insist on a quick bowl or hit of tennis.

    16. Re:The better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in Japan and bought a Wii a few months back. While Wii Sports did give me moments of excitement, the charm kinda wore off after I reached 2000+ in Tennis. I also bought Super Paper Mario and Zelda TP, but unfortunately my knowledge of Japanese isnt that great to figure out the clues in the narration - so these were never completed.

      I go to the game section of the department stores often - but find that major people queue up and buy the DS-Lite, PSP, PS3 (even XBox), but there is hardly any excitement at the Wii section. Also looking at the graphics and game titles for the PS3 and even PSP makes me wanna buy these.

      My Wii is currently at my Japanese employers home (he has two kids) - and I am silently hoping that he will buy it from me. PSP is on my wishlist next.

    17. Re:The better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who think Nintendo is doing this on purpose to "generate demand" are fucking retarded.

    18. Re:The better question by LKM · · Score: 1

      Nintendo ships a million Wiis a month. They aren't holding back shipments, and they aren't creating an illusion of excessive demand. There simply is excessive demand. They've overtaken the 360, which had a year headstart, within less than a year (10 months or so, I think).

  4. Poor timing by Veilrap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This statement is very poorly timed and thus most likely completely inaccurate. 1. Christmas season starts soon. Christmas = high sales period. 2. Wii has 3 extremely popular games being released between now and february.

    1. Re:Poor timing by xTantrum · · Score: 1

      amen to the op. "haters!" to the japanese news paper. and "hurry up already" to my back ordered wii.

      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
    2. Re:Poor timing by the+dark+hero · · Score: 2, Informative

      This statement is very poorly timed and thus most likely completely inaccurate. 1. Christmas season starts soon. Christmas = high sales period. 2. Wii has 3 extremely popular games being released between now and february. Agreed! November is the shopping month and the new Mario comes out. Link's Crossbow training is also due out. December has a few good releases. Smash in February! Mario Kart in Spring! Mind you these are just the first party titles. We should be getting hit with the onslaught of games from developers that are just catching up(because no one expected wii to do so well) after a late start.
      --
      You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

      Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

    3. Re:Poor timing by metamatic · · Score: 4, Informative

      The rest of your argument would only apply if the Wii existed in a vacuum. It doesn't. It's being shut out of the software top ten, its hardware sales are only 10,000 per week ahead of the PS3 at this point...


      Lets look at some games sales stats for October...
      DS 135,851
      Xbox 360 129,986
      Wii 95,800
      PSP 91,966
      PS3 29,718

      And as for hardware sales: "Also worth noting - PS2 outsold PS3 2:1 this week, 360 outsold PS3 4:1, and Wii outsold PS3 3:1 this week."

      Ah yes, surely victory for the PS3 is assured! The Wii is only outselling the PS3 3:1 in both hardware and games, Nintendo are doomed!
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:Poor timing by ChefInnocent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nintendo's mistake might be that many of the games people are looking forward to aren't coming out until after Christmas. I've been waiting for Smash Bros & Mario Kart. Before Christmas, the only game coming out that I will purchase is Mario Galaxy. Maybe there is something else, but they should have pushed the big titles to release before Christmas.

      Another issue is that if people can't get a Nintendo, they will eventually give up on wanting one. I was lucky (and crazy enough to sit in the freezing weather) to get one when they first came out. I quite enjoy it, and play it weekly, but if I was one of the many who couldn't have got one early, I probably would have given up.

    5. Re:Poor timing by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      February != the Christmas season. Yeah. But, even though Smash and Kart have been delayed, the Wii still has Mario Galaxy, Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn, Link's Crossbow Training (no, it's not a full game, but you know everyone will buy it), and Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles among their exclusives until the end of the year. The Wii's gonna be just fine this holiday.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    6. Re:Poor timing by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've already given up. I don't do the insane "wait in line" thing, so I missed out on the first of them... and now they're nowhere to be found in the Dallas area (not that I'm looking terribly hard.) Every day that passes is a day I desire one less and less.

      I'm perfectly happy with my PS3/360... Nintendo's lack of production/distribution made the Wii a non-impulse purchase... *shrug*

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    7. Re:Poor timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox 360 129,986 One word - HALO
    8. Re:Poor timing by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Are you logged in on someone else's account, by any chance?

      Welcome to Slashdot. You must be new here.

    9. Re:Poor timing by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    10. Re:Poor timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wii has 3 extremely popular games being released between now and february.

      Which three? I just beat Zelda, and I'm looking for a new one to buy soon.
    11. Re:Poor timing by nbarriga · · Score: 1

      The shelves are slowly filling as the sales rate drop and the manufactures rise. I got mine 2 weeks ago in Albuquerque. Didn't have to wait or pre order or anything like that.

    12. Re:Poor timing by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      And apparently completely speculative regarding whether they're actually being used or not. One interpretation for poor software sales is that the consoles aren't being used; another is that people are actually playing the games they already own. One statement from an anonymous "software house president" does not constitute evidence, particularly if he bet and lost the farm on porting RoboSlayer VI: The Gibulating to a platform that's better suited to and is bought to play other games.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:Poor timing by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Wii is being shut out. It's exceeded the sales of Xbox 360 (just before halo hit) with Xbox having a 1 year head start!!!! But AAA titles are few... heck even introductory games like Smash Bros. and Mario Galaxy STILL aren't out yet. Part of the issue is that developers don't want to admit they didn't even bother to START games, so now they want to say sales of Wiis are "down" so they stop getting nagged.

      I haven't seen many games for Wii that a casual gamer would die for.. Mario Party was a good one to have, but what else past Wii play? They all scream "rental" rather than buy. Nintendo needs to do more with interaction as well. Where's the DS/Wii interactive games? There's 1 or 2 but come on. Nintendo needs to lower the bar for games on Wii/DS in a big hurry. They need to move to small downloadable content via Wii Points or something... perhaps sync downloadable DS games (with a special cart) via Wii like iPods. They could put larger games on SD cards as they are already keyed to your Wii they can't go anywhere online. They need to get more casual games QUICKLY. I've got one and only bothered to rent half a dozen games so far... that's not good. Where's games like Pikmin 3 or Katamari? Or DDR or Guitar Hero? Those are low overhead games aimed at the target Wii demographic but no where to be seen.

    14. Re:Poor timing by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Guitar Hero Wii comes out this month.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    15. Re:Poor timing by kionel · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's an interesting point if the original article is, in fact, true.

      Consider this: I bought a Wii for my family last Xmas. (Yes, we actually got one.) For about two months it was the only system that we played, despite having a 360 and kick-butt PCs in the house. Wii sports was fantastic, Zelda was good, the rest...okay, the rest sucked, but it was an amazing gaming experience.

      Then winter ended and we stopped playing. We haven't touched it since.

      My kids came up to me the other day and asked whether we should sell the Wii to upgrade the Xbox360's HD. I was relieved; I was wondering if I could sell it, too, because I didn't want it any longer, and I noticed they never played it either.

      I asked them why they wanted to sell the Wii. Simple: They were bored with the system. They the the titles were gimmicky and shallow, and the graphics -- which, I know, shouldn't matter -- were so crude as to distract from the gameplay.

      My point is this: I saw this before this article was published. Though I represent just one family, I have to wonder how many others feel this way, too.

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
    16. Re:Poor timing by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      I'll probably wait until next year to get one... if at all... but it's good to know there's actual production coming from Nintendo. ;) This much of a distribution problem for this long points to insane popularity (on one hand), or if you're a conspiracy nut, artificially restricting supply....

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    17. Re:Poor timing by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Still wanna sell it? I'd be glad to buy it for a fair price.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:Poor timing by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets look at some games sales stats for October...
      DS 135,851
      Xbox 360 129,986
      Wii 95,800
      PSP 91,966
      PS3 29,718


      I'd be happier if you posted world wide game sales stat. Those numbers are just America, cover just one week, and its the 1st week following the launch of Halo 3 no less.

      Moreover the Wii is still only moderately available, and once the christmas shopping picks up, most people predict its going to go back to 'seriously unavailable'.

      Add in the numbers for Japan or World Wide, and the Wii is still right up there with the xbox. And this is at a time when the Xbox is riding the peak of popularity with Halo3 launch madness, possibly one of the most highly hyped and anticipated games ever.

      If any console is in a 'bubble' right now, its the xbox 360.

    19. Re:Poor timing by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      sell the Wii to upgrade the Xbox360's HD

      Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat??

    20. Re:Poor timing by kionel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, already have a buyer.

      It was fun while it lasted.

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
    21. Re:Poor timing by wastaz · · Score: 1

      What games allows you to use your DS and your Wii together?

    22. Re:Poor timing by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      February/March releases are: "We can't get it done by Christmas, but if we don't force it out before the end of the financial year (April) it'll make us look bad". Note "us" = "the execs".

      Seriously, so few games release Q2 and Q3 of the year (summer) because a Q4 release means Christmas (in fact holding it back a few months can actually improve sales because of Christmas), and Q1 means before the end of the financial year.

    23. Re:Poor timing by ElleyKitten · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't seen many games for Wii that a casual gamer would die for.. I think part of the definition of "casual gamer" is that they wouldn't die for a game...

      They all scream "rental" rather than buy. Casual gamers don't rent, they buy one game and play it for months. Many casual gamers are still playing Wii Sports. Between Sports, Play, Mario Party, Super Monkey Ball, Wario Ware, and VC games like Dr Mario, casual gamers have more than enough games for the limited times they play.

      Where's the DS/Wii interactive games? After all the complaints about the Gamecube/GBA games and how horrible it is to require a console and a handheld or 4, I'm shocked that they're even making more games like that.

      Where's games like Pikmin 3 Try Elebits.

      or Katamari? Never on a Nintendo system before. Try Monkey Ball.

      Or DDR Released last month.

      or Guitar Hero? You've got less than a month to go. Getting a bit impatient?

      I've got one and only bothered to rent half a dozen games so far... that's not good. Maybe you need to look around more.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    24. Re:Poor timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greetings Wii gamer. I come to you from the parallel universe of "360" where not only do we have good games being released faster than any human being could play them, but so much downloadable content available that even 20 gigabyte drives are too small for some users.

      Seriously, have you not noticed that most of the ranting in this thread is PS3 vs. Wii? I mean sure, there are the odd short posts like this one but none of the vitriol, none of the stamina! Why do you think that is? Could it be that most of the 360 owners are busy playing games? It's hard to be grumpy about this stuff when every Friday theres a new shiny release to play.

    25. Re:Poor timing by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      I think just Pokemon Battle Revolution.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    26. Re:Poor timing by LKM · · Score: 1

      Nintendo's mistake might be that many of the games people are looking forward to aren't coming out until after Christmas.

      How is that a mistake if Wiis will be sold out during Christmas anyway? I think it's a great idea to launch AAA titles early next year to get yet another sales boost after Christmas. Kids need to spend all the money they got for Christmas, right?

  5. Third party developers by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Until a third party publisher releases a game that sells well on the Wii, it shouldn't be surprising that developers are shying away. (Given Nintendo's track record of dicking them over.)

    1. Re:Third party developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like Rayman Raving Rabbids?

      Shying away like Monster Hunt 3 going exclusive to the wii?

    2. Re:Third party developers by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1
      RRR was a cookie cutter mini-games fest. Fun for a few hours, but that's the extent of it.


      Monster Hunt 3 will likely sell well in Japan, as expected. Do you honestly think it's going to be a hit in the US?

    3. Re:Third party developers by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the past week the top five games for the wii included Carnival Games at #1 and DDR at #3. Resident Evil's been up there, Rayman's been up there, and you have to go back six weeks to find one in which there aren't two games in their top five that are from a company other than nintendo. Developers that put out games for the wii have, so far, been reaping some nice benefits from the data that I've seen.

    4. Re:Third party developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You asked some questions.

      I showed you were wrong and then you moved the goal posts.

      Who cares what kind of game RRR was! It sold well. I showed you were wrong.

      Do game styles you don't like somehow don't count? If a game makes money from a game style you don't like, are you suggesting it's not real money.

      Who cares Monster Hunter 3 is in Japan. They went to Wii because they said it was a better console to develop for. I showed you were wrong. Why does it in a different country make a difference? Monster Hunter is a HUGE game in Japan.

      You don't think people play video games in Japan?

      What you did was try to change the argument when I showed you were wrong. Grow up.

    5. Re:Third party developers by tepples · · Score: 1

      Who cares Monster Hunter 3 is in Japan Unlike PLAYSTATION 3, Wii has region lockout on all games.
    6. Re:Third party developers by Tofystedeth · · Score: 1

      Besides, the article was originally from the Japanese newspaper, Nikkei, so a game being popular there is very relevant to this article at least.

      --
      "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
    7. Re:Third party developers by ledestin · · Score: 1

      Was there an official statement from Sony that they support region lockout at all?

  6. Sort of by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have I played my Wii much recently? Not really. I beat Metroid Prime 3, and that was fun, but other than that not to much out there interests me right now. Of course, by the same token I've played my PS2 even less than my Wii. I just don't have much time right now to spend on gaming consoles. When something like Smash Bros, or Mario Kart hits I'm sure it will see more use.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:Sort of by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Have I played my Wii much recently? Not really. I beat Metroid Prime 3, and that was fun, but other than that not to much out there interests me right now. Of course, by the same token I've played my PS2 even less than my Wii. I just don't have much time right now to spend on gaming consoles.

      That's about the shape of it, I reckon.

      Who's buying Wii? New gamers, non-gamers. People who don't buy a new game every month. People who might well just play Wii Sports for years on end and never think to buy another game.

      The result is that Wii game sales aren't so high as some people expected, given the enormous sales of hardware.

      Myself, although two years ago I was looking forward to buying a PS3, somehow I've gone all Nintendo lately and I'm happy with it. Truth is, I don't have so very much time for games any more. I've already got four or five games waiting for me to complete them, in addition to all the old favourites I still play despite having beaten them every possible way years ago. They compete for my free time with all those DVDs, all those downloads, the damn net itself, and the pub.

      Right now, the games I'm likely to buy in the future are Phantom Hourglass (next week), Super Mario Galaxy (next month), Guitar Hero 3 (Christmas) and Smash (whenever). It's not exactly a hardcore schedule, but it's plenty for me. None of these are short games, none will be finished quickly. And if you're Nintendo, does it matter? Every single sale is a profit.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Sort of by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I picked up Phantom Hourglass a few days ago and so far it's great. The control scheme can cause some headaches occasionally, mostly because when I have a enemy heading at me I don't want to take the time to click the boomerang icon, then draw the path I want it to follow. The mini-games can also be a bit tough to complete, but since those are all just bonuses and not needed to complete the core game that doesn't really detract any from the experience. I figure I'm at least 2/3 of the way done with it (mostly playing at night right before bed), and I'd say it's a pretty good addition to any DS library.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:Sort of by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      3 friends equipped with Wiimotes and one copy of Mario Strikers: Charged will increase your Wii time by 10 fold. Game is insanely fun. A lightning level that zaps the ball, and all around it, keeps you on your toes. ("Gha! Get away, it's gonna get hit!!"). Daisy hitting the electric fence is always funny. There is a fire level with fireballs raining down upon the field constantly. There is a storm stage where the wind can blow players off the board (and cows and tractors across it!!!).

      It really is massive fun. Not hard for anyone to learn, either. Give it a rent and you'll see.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    4. Re:Sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue doesn't seem to be a lack of good games, it's a lack of good games with replay value. Super Smash Bros. doesn't get old, but when's the last time you played through Zelda over and over?

  7. No dust. by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know anyone that has a Wii that is gathering dust, and that includes the one at my Mother's house.

    Games for -all- consoles tend to be a bit lacking this year, as far as I'm concerned, but the Wii has definitely kept up with the others in terms of game count. If anything, they should be asking if the PS3s are gathering dust. There's hardly any good games yet, and the ones that ARE out came out later than their 360 counterparts. Gamers aren't known for their patience at the time of a game's release... They buy what's available.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:No dust. by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Wii would be gathering dust, if I hadn't already sold it. I don't say this as flamebait or anything, but I beat Twilight Princess and then saw nothing on the near horizon so I sold it to my brother-in-law on the cheap in December 2006. Smash Bros. Brawl is the sequel to my most played game of all time so I will definitely be picking up another Wii early next year, but I don't miss our time apart. The only game that's out now that I even would have considered buying was Metroid Prime 3. I'm not really Nintendo's target demographic anymore but I do enjoy their first-party games.

    2. Re:No dust. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Hi, nice to meet you.

      I have barely used by Wii since I got my PS3 in June. Why? Nothing good has come out for it, plain and simple.

      Don't get me wrong, it's not like I'm running home to play with the PS3 every night either, but there has been a fairly steady stream of PS3-specific downloadable tiles for the PS3, and all the Wii's got is more mini-games, and the virtual console stuff. Stuff on the shelves at the store isn't compelling at the listed pricepoint, Zelda doesn't have very much replay value, and downloadable Wii titles don't exist...

      Sure, when there are people over, we'll play on the Wii. But other than that, I'm waiting for the games.

    3. Re:No dust. by misterooga · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mine is not gathering dust since I put it away in a plastic bag... I think I might lend it to my brother soon. Having said that, it has been great at BBQ parties where we took out our TV and set it out in the backyard so we can play wii sports without hurting each other. I think it's just the matter of how busy you are. I spend more time on DS since I can use it while I commute. PC/wii, not so much.

    4. Re:No dust. by techstar25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As software/hardware maker, which would you prefer: The Wii gathering dust in people's homes, or the PS3 gathering dust on store shelves.
      Let's not forget, Christmas is just a couple of months away, and the Wii is the hot item once again.

    5. Re:No dust. by Wordplay · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have all of the major consoles, and of them, the Wii is the least-played, and the Xbox 360 is the most-played, with the PS3 in the middle. The PS3 only has a handful of good on-disc games, but as the other guy who replied mentioned, the downloadables save the system. Many of the downloadable games are very high quality.

    6. Re:No dust. by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1

      Games for -all- consoles tend to be a bit lacking this year, as far as I'm concerned Well, I'd imagine you don't have a 360, then. This has been MS's year as far as AAA games being released: Halo 3, Bioshock, Blue Dragon(US), Eternal Sonata, Guitar Hero 2/3, Rock band, Mass Effect, Orange box, and more.
      Of course, if you don't like FPSs, RPGs, or music games, you'd likely say that this year's games sucked then.
    7. Re:No dust. by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't have a lot of time for games... I'd go for Zelda; Metroid Prime is not my cup of tea...

      That doesn't seem to leave a lot. I lucked into finding a Wii last month, and I have Pirates of the Caribbean (only because I though my wife would like it after seeing a video of people playing) and Pokemon Revolution (for the kids).

      I've always though those Pokemon games sucked, and still do, but they seem to like it enough. Pirates is OK, I suppose; but we still play bowling a LOT. Really, we could have gone without any other games and we'd still be enjoying it, but I want to see some interesting games soon.

      So the only problem I see is that people still love their Wiis, there just doesn't seem to be a whole lot of quality games for them.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:No dust. by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I don't do FPS on consoles (Metroid Prime being an exception, but as some have pointed out it's not strictly speaking an FPS). I'm somewhat interested in Mass Effect, but like Bioshock I'll probably play it on PC instead of buying an 360. Honestly at this point I don't see a very compelling reason to buy a 360 when between my PC and PS2 I've got just about every game available for the 360 that I'm interested in.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    9. Re:No dust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anyone that has a Wii that is gathering dust

      That's nice. I don't know any Indian people, therefore all that stuff I've been reading about a country called "India" is just a myth, right? You are a stupid stupid stupid stupid.

    10. Re:No dust. by radish · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll join the others introducing themselves to you :)

      I stood outside TRU in Times Square for 6 hours the morning of launch day to get my Wii, so no-one can say I wasn't excited to get this thing. Played it a bunch the first month or so, but since my wife finished SPM we've basically never switched it on (except to install an update every so often). I honestly can't remember the last Wii game I bought, Metroid is something I'm interested in playing but to be honest it's at the end of a very long list. I just don't have enough time to play all the games on other systems I'm into, and nothing on the Wii appeals enough to beat them in the queue. Mario Kart is a probable buy, likewise Galaxy - but this just feels like the GC all over again.

      Meanwhile I'm finishing Bioshock before starting Halo, finishing DiRT before starting Forza or PGR4 and at some point I'll make it back to R6 Vegas. Ratchet & Clank looks unmissable (first PS3 title to win that award in my book) and I still haven't really finished Crackdown. I will say that the PS3 isn't currently used much more than the Wii, but the 360 is miles ahead (at least for the games I enjoy).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    11. Re:No dust. by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      I don't have a lot of time for gaming either (but actually I love writing about games, the main reasons I started my site). Anyways, my wife isn't into games and we don't have kids yet, so basically I play whatever I want, it's just there's not much time to play, so I consider my gaming time valuable. I own all the systems from last-generation and there are a lot of "AAA" games that I missed. I would much rather play those than the many filler games landing on the Wii lately.

      Oh well, I'm not sure where this post is going anymore. Wii Bowling is awesome and we still play it at a friend's or seomthing.

    12. Re:No dust. by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you don't like Zelda, Metroid Prime, Super Paper Mario, Resident Evil, Madden, or Mario Strikers. So, no sports, no FPS, no platformers, no adventures, and as you mentioned, no minigames. So what sort of games do you actually like, that the PS3 has had a steady stream of?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    13. Re:No dust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm somewhat interested in Mass Effect, but like Bioshock I'll probably play it on PC instead of buying an 360.

      And how do you plan on running a 360 game on the PC?

    14. Re:No dust. by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression it was going to be available for the PC. I thought I saw the pre-release box for it in the PC section of a local game shop. Assuming it is 360 only, I'll just have to wait till I have enough spare cash, and the price looks right to get it and a 360, assuming I'm still interested in playing it by that point.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    15. Re:No dust. by mingot · · Score: 1

      Hi, want some of the dust off of my Wii?

      I camped in the cold for it.

      It'll get some use when mario comes out or when I am tired of the 360 games I have.

    16. Re:No dust. by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone that has a Wii that is gathering dust, and that includes the one at my Mother's house.

      I do. My mother. She wanted one so bad she kept bringing it up. Finally I caved in and bought her one. She was so excited.

      She played once that day and hasn't touched it since.

      I've played it more than she has and I'm not even that impressed with the system (to be fair, though, I'm not impressed with any of the current systems). It's been over a month since it's been turned on.

      The Wii may be a great seller, but I can almost guarantee you that it's nothing more than a novelty item for most of the people who've bought them.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    17. Re:No dust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won a Wii in a raffle and bought Zelda for it. Played it for about 10 minutes and haven't touched it since - I haven't even bothered to turn the thing back on. If I wanted horrible looking games then I would much rather just play some old NES/SNES games.

    18. Re:No dust. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat, except I play my PS3 more than the 360. I quite honestly haven't had the Wii on for more than an hour in the past two months when my PS3 and 360 have both logged at least 75 hours.

    19. Re:No dust. by zemote · · Score: 1

      Mine is definately not gathering dust since NBA Live 08 came out. My parents have a wii and my brother also has one alos. My uncle just bought one. I don't think the novelty is wearing off at all as everyone I know wants one that doesn't have one. People are starting to hunt for them for christmas because they know they are hard to come by. It's crazy that it's been a year and they are still not readily available.

    20. Re:No dust. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Ah the inevitable "that's not my experience" thread, with lots of posts agreeing and disagreeing, all based on personal experience.

      Thing is, a Slashdot geek is not a typical Wii user. The Wii was successful because it reached beyond the traditional gamer audience. Assuming your mom is not a "traditional gamer" (some older folks are!) she's a more valid data point than all the rest of us put together.

      By the same token, it might not be that big a deal that nobody but Nintendo has released a successful Wii game. I suspect other game studio don't quite grok the platform. This is a completely different kind of game console — you can't just port traditional twitch-and-jump games to it.

    21. Re:No dust. by crackspackle · · Score: 1

      I have all three consoles and from my experience, I won't use my Wii unless there's some really good reason, namely a new Zelda, Super Mario, or Metroid Prime game and yes, I recently dusted it off for MP3 but that's about it. I for one do not like the idea of having to stand in front of a game system and do forced exercise when all I want to do is relax. Forget Wii sports, I haven't touched it and I made Zelda and MP3 work while I sat my fat arse down in a chair. I don't see the the Wii's new controller scheme brought anything to the table other than a lack of precise control needed to make games compelling and difficult. I beat every boss in MP3 on the first try.

      Add to that, there's not much else you can do with the Wii that doesn't look downright fugly compared to the PS3 and the the XBox360, particularly if you have an HDTV like I do. Althought the PS3 has few worthwhile games, it's by far the best for Internet Browsing or utilizing your home media collection. Everything looks just like I would expect from a PC with high resolution and a giant screen. It looks horrible on the Wii and the browser might as well be IE3 on a CGA monitor.

      As far as game graphics, Wii has got around that by having Zelda available at its debut, but the truth is most of the games are miserable compared to either the X360 or PS3. Even without true HD on most games yet, the other consoles still blow the Wii out of the water. Of course, graphics are not all what gameplay is about. I bought my Wii because of my past experience with Nintendo's marquee games and I probably always will by Nintendo as long as they keep making them, but for other games it's a no-brainer. I will never a Wii version if another is available.

    22. Re:No dust. by IgnitusBoyone · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. Since I picked up my PS3 I have picked up more PSN games for it then I own VC titles. The PSN interface is easier to use in my opinion and it doesn't give me the trouble that the VC has given me in the past.(multiple charges when not using a point card) I own a few wii titles, but I don't think any of them are great by any means. I own several PS3 titles I would say 3 of them I am proud to own. I have also downloaded like 10 games for the PSN basically at an average of 6 dollars a game I look at it as a game rental that I get to keep. We pick up about a game every two weeks and play it for the weekend. I don't use my PS3 as a ps3 nearly as often as I use in ps2/psx mode, but that internal memory card feature makes my life so much easier so I am proud to say I own a ps3 to play ps2 games lol. In the last few months I have picked up an insane amount of ps2 titles for cheap. I don't really enjoy paying 60 dollars a new title at this point in my life I am in the 20 dollar game market, but at that price range I buy a lot of games between August and October each year. So, maybe next year when the Wii titles have come down I will pick up a few, but for now I just do not enjoy the system as much as I have my ps3

      --
      Momento Mori
    23. Re:No dust. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I played Zelda. Why would I get Madden for the Wii when I could play it in HD? No, I don't like Metroid Prime. And it's not that I don't like the Minigames.. I just don't want to spend upwards of $30 on the same old ones re-hashed, when I could be playing $5 games on another system.

      But you've probably never even tried the other systems, or you'd have know all that. Really, which games in your list have come out since june. Just Strikers and Metroid. Wow. Two games. I'm blown away.

    24. Re:No dust. by shimage · · Score: 1
      Why bother listing multiplats? They don't raise or lower a platform relative to its peers. In particular, Guitar Hero 1/2/3 and Rock Band are all on the PS2 (don't try to tell me that either of those games need HD graphics). Of the remaining games, none of them are in genres I like (platformers, puzzlers, TBS, adventure). That said, I would agree that the 360's library is finally showing some teeth (after what? 2 years?). Even if they're games I don't really want, I am willing to recognize that the 360 has a handful of AAA titles coming out this fall, whereas the other consoles are looking at 1 or 2 at most.

      Nonetheless, I am quite happy with the Wii's library now and looking at the next year. I honestly don't have enough time to play what's already on my must-buy list. For people with more time and money than myself I would probably suggest the 360, but for better or worse, the 2 people that I know who fit that description already have one.

    25. Re:No dust. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      By the same token, it might not be that big a deal that nobody but Nintendo has released a successful Wii game. I suspect other game studio don't quite grok the platform. This is a completely different kind of game console -- you can't just port traditional twitch-and-jump games to it.

      A lot of the 3rd party games have been duds, but I don't think you can say that nobody besides Nintendo has been successful. Resident Evil IV, for instance, was both an excellent game, and pure profit for capcom. Red Steel was flawed, but sold a lot. Trauma Center was a big hit for Atlus.

      Keep in mind that games for the wii are, generally, just cheaper to create than for the 360 or PS3. Publishers want games to make a profit, and costs are just as important as sales.

    26. Re:No dust. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I said it to another poster above: I will be glad to buy one for a reasonable price. You're bored, I want one. Give me a number!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    27. Re:No dust. by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      What "360 game"?

    28. Re:No dust. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's the thing, bowling... the Wii comes with the best, most replayable, game that really puts the controller to good use.

      I think game companies need to, maybe, catch up with the "paradigm," to sound like a haughty smart guy.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    29. Re:No dust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't like online only games (re Warhawk), and I prever the tactile nature of "waggle" over a few extra pixels (which I won't see on my SDTV) for sports games.

      So please list the plethora of games that have come out since june for the PS3 that would make it the wonderous object of my affection?!?

      Heavenly Sword (all 6 hours of it!)
      Ninja Gaiden Sigma
      Darkness

      Wow. Three Games. I'm blown away.

    30. Re:No dust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won a Wii in a raffle and bought Zelda for it. Played it for about 10 minutes and haven't touched it since - I haven't even bothered to turn the thing back on

      That's because you're retarded.

    31. Re:No dust. by Brian+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      But you have all three consoles and are thus non-typical. What percentage of people buy more than one console? Outside of the hard-core gaming community it must be a tiny fraction.

      Our Wii is used regularly, because we don't have any other consoles (and I wouldn't have either of the other two in the house anyway). I imagine a high proportion of Wii owners are in the same boat.

      --
      -- BtB
    32. Re:No dust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does the PS3 even have a SINGLE 9+/10 game yet?

      thanks for playing.

    33. Re:No dust. by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 1

      > the Wii has definitely kept up with the others in terms of game count.

      Game count, yes. Game quality, no.

      Using Metacritic's aggregated ratings for the 360, PS3, and Wii, you can see that the 360 has 264 rated games, the PS3 has 82, and the Wii has 87. Since the PS3 and Wii came out later than the 360 and around the same time as each other, this makes sense.

      If you look at the percentage of each console's library that has a metascore of 75 (out of 100) or higher, the PS3 leads with 54%, followed by the 360 at 44%, then the Wii with only 16%. If you go with a metascore of 80+, the PS3 has 34%, the 360 has 27%, and the Wii has only 8% above that level. The only place where the Wii is competitive is in the 90+ tier, where the Wii has 3%, the 360 has 3%, and the PS3 trails with only 1% of its library at that level.

      Going by percentages, the PS3 and 360 libraries are of roughly equivalent quality, while the Wii's lags far behind. That may change as developers shift more resources over to Wii development, but for now it's the reality.

    34. Re:No dust. by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Must... resist... temptation to make joke... about people's "Wii"s gathering dust....

      Anyway, we all knew when the latest video game wars started that the Wii was playing to a different demographic than Sony or MS. They were trying to move beyond the stereotypical gamer market and make games that other people would enjoy. And that worked, it has been a success by any definition of the word. Meanwhile the PS3 has been by most accounts a failure. And that still continues today, if you don't believe me, explain why a year after its release I still can't find one at any of the local stores (and no, I'm not going down there first thing in the morning when they get their shipments in, but if the Wii popularity were bursting there should be a few left over by lunch time when I do stop by). Yes, some people (especially those who are clearly more in the Sony/MS target market than Nintendo's) may well be unhappy with their Wii's performance (ahh, another joke opportunity, must resist...), but a few dissatisfied customers do not make a trend.

      And hey, if your wife has stopped turning on your Wii, there are blue pills to help you do that. Ah crap, I had resisted for so long...

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    35. Re:No dust. by LKM · · Score: 1

      Why would I get Madden for the Wii when I could play it in HD?

      I'm in Europe and have no clue about how this American Football thing works, but I'm guessing you might want to go with the Wii version because it just might be the better game; see: Godfather, Tennis, Golf or many other games available on the Wii as well as on other consoles.

    36. Re:No dust. by LKM · · Score: 1

      I just got skate for the PS3, so I'm hoping it'll occupy some of my time, but apart from Warhawk, the PS3 really has no good game. Motorstorm is cool, but it has far to little content. Resistance is neat, but I don't like FPS and only play it in co-op mode. What else have we got... Calling all Cars? Sure, for a quarter of an hour if a few friends are over. What else? Beats me.

      Recently, I've mainly been playing DS and Wii games. Zelda, Undercover, Jam Sessions on the DS, Paper Mario, Metroid 3 and Mrio Football on the Wii. Oh, and the VC games. Super Metroid, obviously, and a few Japanese games. Missed Lost Levels, unfortunately :-(

    37. Re:No dust. by LKM · · Score: 1

      The Wii has many smaller and quirkier games, which get worse ratings. Even the crappy PS3 games generally get 70-80% on graphics alone.

  8. Dude, Where's my games? by WileyC · · Score: 0

    Unpopular systems get few new games made for them. Popular systems get many new games made for them. If you have a Wii, you really should care.

    In other words, when was the last time you saw an Atari 5200 game hit the market? =)

    --

    /// Not a super-genius . . . yet. ///

    1. Re:Dude, Where's my games? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other words, when was the last time you saw an Atari 5200 game hit the market?

      The much anticipated Adventure II finally hit the market just a few months ago. Though I'll grant you that new games for the 5200 are nowhere near as common as the Atari 2600 releases. The 2600 is just more popular, I'm afraid. :P
    2. Re:Dude, Where's my games? by Soiden · · Score: 1

      A lot of games is not equal to Many good games. Sadly, even with the Wii doing do great, it's not getting games in the same proportion. Instead, PS3 has many exclusives games that are popular and consolesellers. But I don't really care. With the Nintendo franchises I'm already happy [That's why I have played Nintendo consoles since I was 5]. Just add a couple third-party games and I'm happier!

      --
      Minti: What's that huge shuriken in your back?! Kin: It's the instrument of my victory.
  9. strange premise... by russ1337 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The report goes on to discuss the likelihood that many Wiis are gathering dust in owners' cupboards, citing one software house president as saying, 'People bought it out of curiosity, and it's likely a lot of them haven't used it.' Given that September saw Wii sales fall sharply in Japan for the second consecutive month, it seems reasonable to speculate that the bubble inflated by the novelty factor is starting to deflate, but writing Nintendo off at any stage is a perilous course to steer
    It also 'seems reasonable' to speculate that the decline in sales is because everyone has already bought one....

    It also 'seems reasonable' to speculate that everyone who bought one still plays it every night...

    They should have added "It 'seems reasonable' that the company the 'software house president' works for isn't selling as many games as they would like because their particular games suck balls."
    1. Re:strange premise... by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

      the 'software house president' works for isn't selling as many games as they would like because their particular games suck balls."

      If I only had mod points for you.

      Aside from big N's own first party titles, the Wii is suffering a lot of shovelware. After two generations of lackluster market performance, Studios practically ignored the newest Nintendo machine, only to be dumbfounded by its roaring success. Thus, when all the crappy, derivative "wagglemote" games were pushed quickly to market, the same studios are now wondering why their crapware isn't selling.

      (Personally, I'd be more worried about the studios who hitched their train to PS3. Given North American numbers, I don't think a single PS3 software title has sold even a quarter-million units.)

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    2. Re:strange premise... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It also 'seems reasonable' to speculate that everyone who bought one still plays it every night...

      That is an unreasonable speculation because we have no data denying or supporting that claim and it's not intuitively correct either. Many people buy things and do not use them. Most use them but not every night. So it does not seem reasonable that people who bought wii's use them every night.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:strange premise... by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should have added "It 'seems reasonable' that the company the 'software house president' works for isn't selling as many games as they would like because their particular games suck balls." Given the Wii's proclivity for innovative controllers, one that sucks balls could be a huge hit.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:strange premise... by repsychal · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if every Wii is played 24/7 - the problem is, no one is buying games for the Wii. Wii Play had great sales (because everyone needed a second controller) - and Metriod Prime did 'ok' but your games per console for the Wii is the lowest of the three 'next gen' consoles. If every Wii owner plays Wii Sports and doesn't buy anything else for their Wii - it's a flop. It'd be like everyone buying a dvd player and never buying any dvd's for it...

    5. Re:strange premise... by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Most people are probably like me and would love to own a PS3. Just as soon as the price drops below $300 for the system, a game, and a controller. Until then I don't care how nice the games are, I'm not paying $500+ for a game system. For that kind of money I'd be well on my way to a really nice gaming rig that I could also use professionally (and count as a business expense).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:strange premise... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Given the Wii's proclivity for innovative controllers, one that sucks balls could be a huge hit.

      I'm in!

      I have no idea what kind of game I'd play with it, but ... I for one welcome our new ball-sucking overlords.
       
      :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:strange premise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't think a single PS3 software title has sold even a quarter-million units

      Resistance probably has. That's probably about it. I probably like saying "probably" too much.

    8. Re:strange premise... by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

      OK, I managed to lookup some numbers at VGChartz. Indeed, Resistance has sold about 870,000 in North America.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    9. Re:strange premise... by dctoastman · · Score: 1

      Or like my friend who owns a PS3 and is now just using it as a BluRay player because there is nothing worth playing at the moment. He's far more enamored of his 360 now (Bioshock, Halo 3, Eternal Sonata). And he's a pretty big Sony fanboy (self-admitted (and if you go to his house, his electronics bear this out)).

    10. Re:strange premise... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Given the Wii's proclivity for innovative controllers, one that sucks balls could be a huge hit.

      I'm in!

      I have no idea what kind of game I'd play with it, but ... I for one welcome our new ball-sucking overlords. :-P How about Wario Ware?
      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    11. Re:strange premise... by spectro · · Score: 1

      I don't buy games for my wii because of the price. At $49.99 I expect a great quality game and so far the good ones don't exploit the wiimote to its full potential.

      --
      HTML is obsolete. It's time for a new, simpler and richer markup language.
    12. Re:strange premise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you are a cheap bastard.

    13. Re:strange premise... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      At least developers appear to be trying with the controller. Do any games even try to take advantage of the (social) networking the console offers? It's got a built-in wireless adapter, for crying out loud. Why aren't all the games networked in some way?

    14. Re:strange premise... by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think SCEA beat Nintendo to the punch, although their product was designed for females.

    15. Re:strange premise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which brings up a question I've always had: why is it "bad" if something "sucks"? Seems to me that many men spend a lot of time and energy trying to find something/someone like that...

  10. Wii Bubble by LightPhoenix7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I definitely think there's cause for caution with regards to a Wii "bubble" bursting. However, I also think that we're only just now starting to see big games come out for the platform, and that will support the popularity more and more as time passes. The only big name game we've gotten is Zelda. Metroid just came out. The Big Three Mario games (platformer, racing, fighting) haven't hit the console yet, and won't until next year. That's going to step up the support for the platform. So until then, I think it's right to worry, but I think in the long term there's not much to worry about.

    1. Re:Wii Bubble by VTMarik · · Score: 1

      There is no Wii "bubble." Those who want them have them, and they're playing not only retail games, but games from the Virtual Console as well.

      There is nothing to worry about, it's the pre-Christmas lull that has always existed. It's a meager attempt to engender some kind of market fear.

    2. Re:Wii Bubble by GammaKitsune · · Score: 1

      Smash Bros. isn't a Mario game. Really.

      --
      Gamertag: WyleType
    3. Re:Wii Bubble by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Um, if those who want them already have them, why do I almost never see one on store shelves? I lucked out in June, and found one in a rural Wal-Mart when I discovered I'd forgotten to pack pajamas for a vacation. That was the first one I saw available for sale. Since then, I've seen it on sale once or maybe twice.

      Where I live (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA), there's still a shortage. If there is a Wii bubble, and it's not just a little delusional fantasy among Nintento's competitors or people who don't like the Wii, it's nowhere near bursting yet.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Wii Bubble by Whitemage12380 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Super Mario Galaxy (one of the big three mario games) is coming out in almost exactly a month. Support is going to be stepped up really soon now.

    5. Re:Wii Bubble by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      it may be a lot more of a Mario game than you think. have you seen the new extended adventure mode?

  11. Another explanation? by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

    Isn't it also possible that, given the Wii's phenomenal sales 'till now, everyone who wants one has one?

    No matter how much I decide to like the Wii, I highly doubt I'll be buying two any time soon.

    -:sigma.SB

    --
    WARN
    THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    1. Re:Another explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      September and October are always the slowest times for console sales in Japan. Even the PS2 came down to 20-30k per week every September and October. The PS3 is down to a little over 10k per week. The 360 is the exception. Due to Halo it's now selling over 5k a week as opposed to its usual 2-3k per week.

      Wii sales in the US are still steady at a little under 100k per week. Nintendo has promised there will be at least double the number of Wiis there were at launch this Christmas so it should be an interesting holiday season.

    2. Re:Another explanation? by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

      I know lots of people who want one but haven't got one yet. Including me...

      --
      Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
    3. Re:Another explanation? by seebs · · Score: 1

      It seems exceedingly unlikely. They are still selling out pretty fast, although I've seen them in stock a few times now. Most of the people I know who want one will get one when they see it, but won't go looking.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    4. Re:Another explanation? by j33pn · · Score: 1

      If that were true, then they would be piling up on the shelves, which I haven't seen. If they aren't sitting on the shelves, and sales are down, then they aren't releasing as many to the stores. Maybe they are cutting shipments to build inventory for the Christmas season. If they already know they can't meet this year's Christmas demand, this may the part of a strategy to minimize the number of angry Christmas shoppers.

      --
      You people and your slight differences disgust me! - Prof. Farnsworth
  12. Oh please. by Naelok · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With all the heavy hitters that Wii has lined up in the next few months, one can only conclude that this article is BS. I bet these are the same 'analysts' who predicted that Nintendo would remain a distant third last year at about this time. They were wrong then and they're wrong now.

    1. Re:Oh please. by toolie · · Score: 1

      Haven't people been saying it's popularity was gonna tank since the 2nd week after release? This isn't new, and its still not correct.

      --
      -- toolie
    2. Re:Oh please. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      From my experience with big media, crow is something that they avoid like we would avoid roadkill.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  13. Really bad assumptions by milamber3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Suggesting that tons of people bought the Wii and have never even used it is a really awful assumption. While it's true some people will buy it and use it less often than other's that's not to say it will sit in a box collecting dust. I got the Wii on launch day and my girlfriend and I have gone through periods where we use the Wii and lot and then periods when we dont play for a while. It has more to do with our jobs then a lack of interest. Some of the games we most want to play have not even come out yet. Regardless, the Wii does not have some special characteristic that will make people lose interest and not buy games for it any more that they would for the PS3 or Xbox 360.

    1. Re:Really bad assumptions by cowscows · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a couple things at work for the Wii here I think. First off, the supply of games has been a bit slow, likely due to miscalculations by lots of developers not expecting the Wii to take off the way it did. But on the other hand, the PS3 doesn't have a huge flood of games either, and it more hype than I'd ever seen. It's still early in the lives of both consoles.

      Second, Nintendo's "casual gamer" idea seems to really be happening, and the usage patterns of a "casual" hobbiest(is that a word?) are irregular and can leave a console sitting idle. My tennis racket has been sitting untouched in the garage for a couple years, but that doesn't mean that I don't like tennis or that tennis isn't popular. It means that I don't have time to play tennis anymore.

      And third, sort of connected to the casual gamer deal, a good number of the games that are out are geared towards more casual and social play, so it's difficult for a hardcore gamer to sit down and spend entire days playing it.

      From the point of view of a traditional hardcore gamer, those three things might look pretty discouraging for the Wii. But what Nintendo has discovered is that to have a successful console, it's not really necessary to give that sort of gamer everything they want. A couple months of sales fluctuations to not make a trend, and it seems silly to try and figure that sort of stuff out right now, when the big christmas season is right around the corner.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:Really bad assumptions by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I also think the Wii doesn't lend it's self to game churning.
      I don't think you will see a lot of people buying a game, taking it home, playing it for days/weeks until they beat the game, trade it for store credit, repeat.
      I think people that buy Wii games will tend to keep them and keep playing them.
      I could be wrong but I still find this idea of "finishing" a game odd. A game should be fun to keep playing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Really bad assumptions by cowscows · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there are games of both types, and there's certainly room for both types to co-exist. A good example being games that are heavily story driven. Day of the Tentacle was one of my all time favorite games, but when I took the storyline to its end and finished it, I didn't really have much of an interest in starting over and going through it all again. The bulk of the fun in that game was figuring out the goofy puzzles, as well as seeing the surprises in the story. It's just not as exciting if you already know what to do and what's going to happen.

      Compare that to a something like a racing game, or a more "sandbox" game like GTA3, there's a lot more replay-ability there. It's usually created through "random" content generation (pedestrians wondering around the city, racing opponents taking different paths, etc.) or through online-multiplayer gaming.

      But that's not to say that story-driven games are inferior, they're just different. And they're not always mutually exclusive, but usually various constraints will force a developer to lean one-way or the other. The storyline in the GTA games was never all that exciting to me, but the sandbox elements allowed me to create all sorts of fun. In the latest Zelda or KOTOR, I had some fun just running around exploring and killing random stuff, but it didn't last too long after I finished the storylines. But those storylines were much more epic and enjoyable than anything I ever got from GTA.

      I could play tetris from now until the end of time.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:Really bad assumptions by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I guess I forgot the joy of things like Zork. But I think casual gamers tend to not like the heavy story driven games. They just don't lend themselves to casual play.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Really bad assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, the Wii does not have some special characteristic that will make people lose interest and not buy games for it any more that they would for the PS3 or Xbox 360.

      Au contraire. Part of Wii's appeal is that it's a console that encourages exercise, so I can see parent of fat kids buying it as an exercise device that will sit there collecting dust next to the treadmill, the bowflex, the ab-whatever-2000-deluxe, and the thighmaster.

    6. Re:Really bad assumptions by __aanaom1261 · · Score: 1

      If anything the Wii has the advantage of truly exclusive IPs.

      I bought a 360 and all the accessories back in January and sold it all off by April. Why? Because I realized that anything released for the XBox will eventually be available for the PC; Microsoft being a computer company trying to push cross platform online gaming between XBox Live and Windows Vista users.

      I mean really: I already have a computer. I'll just upgrade my video card and add more memory. I'll still get to play Gears of War and Halo 2, but it will only cost me $150 instead of $600.

      A Mario or Zelda game on the other hand is not available anywhere else.

  14. Balls Back In Boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wii flaccidating time :(

  15. Who could've guessed!? by el_chupanegre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Welcome to 4 months ago. That's the last time I bought a game for mine.

    It was fun at first, and my dad still asks me to play a game of golf with him on it, but seriously, the novelty wears off very quickly.

    I think most of the problem stems from the lack of original gameplay. The games that I bought were ones that just wouldn't work nearly as well with a different control scheme. Kororinpa is the best example. Using the wiimote to move the screen around is very intuitive and very fun.

    But look at the raft of games coming out at the moment: Fifa 2008, Madden 08 and about 6 different kid's films adaptations. What makes me get this for my Wii instead of my 360? The control scheme is the Wii's only advantage, and what advantage does it have in anything that's coming out at the moment?

    Most of the time when they do try and take advantage of the controls, it comes off worse anyway. Apparently Trauma Centre: Second Opinion is just far too fiddly and how many of us have stood spinning in a circle looking at the sky in an FPS?

    I would love to see this succeed because for once someone tried something new, but with a lack of original content, what could you possibly achieve over the competition? To be honest, we all saw this coming

    1. Re:Who could've guessed!? by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The control scheme is the Wii's only advantage, and what advantage does it have in anything that's coming out at the moment?


      The control scheme makes a world of difference in Metroid Prime 3.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Who could've guessed!? by Robert1 · · Score: 1

      I think you hit it the issue right on its head. The main problem is this:

      1 - games are either shitty multiplatform/not designed for the control scheme games.
      2 - games ARE designed with the proper control scheme etc. but play awfully as the wiimote is simply not precise enough to use it for its intended purposes.

      example: Twilight Princess. A really fun game, but I felt like nothing was gained by having it on the Wii vs Gamecube. Everyone of course wanted to control his sword; swing the wiimote and Link reflects your swing. Instead we see "gesture" buttons. Shake controller = B button.

      It seems the only games that can actually be designed and well implemented with the control scheme are those that require tilting/rolling inputs, since those are the only sensors responsive enough to illict any meaningful interactive experience. This limits the amount of games companies can produce for it and the effect is really noticable even to casual gamers who use the wii for any length of time.

    3. Re:Who could've guessed!? by shihonage · · Score: 1

      All I can say is that I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    4. Re:Who could've guessed!? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The DS had that problem at first too. But eventually, developers got used to the new controls and it got some awesome games. The Wii's had some dry spots, but it's got some really good games and it's going to have a good Christmas. Upcoming it has Fire Emblem, Resident Evil, Mario Galaxy, Soul Calibur Legends, Mario & Sonic Olympics, and NiGHTS (and other exclusives - check out IGN's release list), and you should check out Super Paper Mario and Metroid if you haven't already. There's a lot of original content for Wii, and there will be a whole lot more. Don't give up on it.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    5. Re:Who could've guessed!? by DilbertLand · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed by the remote also. It was much less precise than I had hoped or had been lead to believe in a lot of the reviews. The local BestBuy happened to get a shipment last Friday so I picked one up since there were a couple on the shelf. I played the sports package for about 45 minutes. Now, a week later, I haven't touched the system once - and really don't have any desire to do so. I'll likely just pack it back up and return it so it'll have a better home. I think it's a reasonably good attempt for the first generation of motion sensing controllers, but it's not good enough for me (personally) to find it an enjoyable experince.

    6. Re:Who could've guessed!? by LKM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Wii gets a lot of crap games, but it's not true that there are no games coming out that make good use of the Wii Remote. Dewy's Adventure is one of the newer ones.

    7. Re:Who could've guessed!? by LKM · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't that the control isn't precise. The issue is that it's not always obvious how to control things. For example:

      - Did you know that you can put spin on the ball in Wii Tennis by turning the controller while hitting the ball?
      - Did you know that you can make uppercuts and hit from the side in Wii Boxing?

      The Wii Remote is actually pretty precise, but lobbing a ball in Tennis isn't just pressing B anymore, so you have to spend some time with the games and get to know the control.

  16. A similar case? by metroid+composite · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the months leading up to the release of Halo 3, XBox 360s dropped and dropped in monthly sales.

    In the months leading up to the release of [Super Mario Galaxy], [Wiis] dropped and dropped in monthly sales.


    Not to say the Wii's popularity isn't dropping, I just think it's too early to draw a definitive conclusion here.

    1. Re:A similar case? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      One reason Nintendo's sales might be low right now, entirely speculating, perhaps Nintendo might be holding back a few units to have a bit more on the shelves during the Christmas shopping season?

  17. Not surprising... by badasscat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hate to say "I told you so" but there are a lot of us doing just that these days. It's too early to say this is a definitive trend, and it also might really only apply to one territory, but I personally think it's going to continue to play out, and worldwide.

    Nintendo's made no secret of trying to attract "casual gamers" - housewives, girls, the elderly. They appeal directly to those groups in their ads. Their most heavily hyped "games" - if you can even call stuff like "Wii Fit" a "game" - are geared towards them.

    So they package "Wii Sports" in with the system (or "Wii Play", I can't remember which one Japan got), those casual gamers buy it and I guarantee half of them don't even realize there are other games available for the system. If they do, they don't care - they're casual gamers, they're not out buying a new game every week. They're content with their pack-in game, and when they lose interest in it, the system just gets stuffed into a closet and forgotten.

    It's happening. Look at the Japanese software charts, not just the hardware charts. Not a single Wii game in the top ten last week, this on supposedly the most popular console in Japan. That's actually not even unusual these days. Devs have to be taking notice of this by now, and the Nikkei article suggests that they are.

    The only question in my mind is whether or not it's too late to turn things around. I think that certainly a few of the big games in the pipeline will help, but then the competition's got big games in the pipeline too (not to mention a price drop). So it's not going to get any easier for Nintendo. And they've already pretty much cemented the system's reputation, through their own doing. Not many hardcore gamers in any territory are going to want to own the system that their grandma and little sister thinks is cool. That probably sounds harsh, but that's the way 18-24 year old males think, and they make up the majority of hardcore gamers.

    Whether or not the Wii continues to outsell the PS3 and Xbox 360 (by whatever shrinking margin it can muster), the big problem for them is that games aren't selling, really at all. That will in turn mean less third-party support, which will in turn mean fewer hardware sales in the long run. It's basically the GameCube all over again. These trends have a way of being self-perpetuating vicious cycles once they get started.

    Of course, Nintendo will always have handhelds to rely on. The DS continues to be a money machine, though it's running neck and neck with the PSP in Japan right now too (and was beaten handily week before last, with the PSP redesign and Crisis Core launch).

    1. Re:Not surprising... by Volante3192 · · Score: 3, Informative

      So they package "Wii Sports" in with the system (or "Wii Play", I can't remember which one Japan got)

      Japan didn't come with a bundled game.

    2. Re:Not surprising... by alph0ns3 · · Score: 1

      Hum...

      The Wii had 4 (Play, Metroid, Strikers, Party) of the top 10 sellers in August, you know (In the US)

      360: 2 (Madden and BioShock)

      PS3: 1 (Madden)

    3. Re:Not surprising... by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      So let me get this right... You are saying that casual gamers that Nintendo has targeted do not buy games and that the console gathers dust from these gamers. Yet, the Wii has dominated the Sales charts for the last 10 months. If your first statement was correct, I would of never expected any of the new games to be top 10 hits(especially when they only had a million consoles). The fact is that I own a Wii, am a very casual gamer and have visited a store looking for a new Wii game to buy for the last 3 weeks. I have bought more games for the Wii than I had for the super nintendo

      I do think the novelty of carnival games has worn off. As long as 3rd party people keep releasing those(and don't do anything new) then they will be disappointed.

      Also, I was surprised to see the PSP beating the DS by such a large amont last week, but you answered the question. Nobody was surprised when the XBox360 sold more consoles than the PS2. Nobody was surprised when the DS Lite sold more consoles than the regular DS. New consoles(even redesigns) generate sales. It is long-term sales that really matter and the PSP needs to repeat last weeks performance for another year or two to really matter.

    4. Re:Not surprising... by LarryRiedel · · Score: 1

      Japan didn't come with a bundled game.

      I think it was worth it anyway.

      Larry

    5. Re:Not surprising... by analog_line · · Score: 1

      The DS continues to be a money machine, though it's running neck and neck with the PSP in Japan right now too (and was beaten handily week before last, with the PSP redesign and Crisis Core launch).


      When just about every man woman and child in Japan has a DS, you're going to see sales fall off. Only so many people need two or more of them. A redesigned PSP means that people who could afford a second console may be buying a PSP, simmilar to how the GameCube got a reputation as a "second console" in America.
    6. Re:Not surprising... by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1

      Right on. I'm a big fan of Nintendo, I'm attached to its major franchises, and spent plenty of time playing my Gamecube. I wanted to play the next Zelda, the next Mario Kart, Smash Brothers, Metroid Prime, etc, but the whole motion controller gimmick has really turned me off from the system. I go to the gym for my daily exercise; I don't sit in front of the TV waving my arm around for it. The Wiimote was interesting at first but forcing its use in every game just doesn't make sense. This view is usually written off as that of a hardcore gamers, and not Nintendo's target audience, but hardcore gamers are the ones who buy multiple games.

      Casual gamers, by their very nature, only play games casually and are not likely to continually buy new games. They're not going to burn through their games and look for the next great title. The incredible number of sales to casual gamers may serve as a beachhead to get developers to notice the popularity of the system, but they need to sustain sales of games for it to be a viable platform.

      I owned a total of 4 games for the original Xbox because I found the library to be somewhat lacking, I now own 18 for the 360 because of an outstanding library of good games. There are at least a half dozen Wii games I would like to own at this point, but I just want to play with a normal controller. I also don't want to commit my dollars to buy a system where the novelty is the driving sales force which might die out prematurely.

    7. Re:Not surprising... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not many hardcore gamers in any territory are going to want to own the system that their grandma and little sister thinks is cool. That probably sounds harsh, but that's the way 18-24 year old males think No, that's the way that 13-18 year old males think, maybe 13-20. Once you get above 20 or so, in my experience, people grow the fuck up, and buy a console based on what it has available, not whether their grandma or little sister likes it. Hell, I'm 22, and a proud Wii owner.
      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    8. Re:Not surprising... by DeepZenPill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah no games, but I believe Japan's bundle at the end of WWII came with a few military bases.

    9. Re:Not surprising... by metroid+composite · · Score: 4, Informative

      they're casual gamers, they're not out buying a new game every week.

      I'm a game developer, and before that an administrator for a gaming website. I don't buy a new game every week. Studies I've read suggest that this "once a week" demographic only accounts for 3% of all gamers.

      It's happening. Look at the Japanese software charts, not just the hardware charts. Not a single Wii game in the top ten last week, this on supposedly the most popular console in Japan.

      You're right, according to last week we should expect the 360 to win in Japan! ...Or we could look at this week, where in the top 30 there's 5 Wii games, 1 PS3 game, and 0 360 games (despite the Wii hardware dropping AGAIN). Now, 5/30 is low, but 0/30 and 1/30 are DISASTERS.

      the competition's got big games in the pipeline too (not to mention a price drop).

      The Wii is also quite capable of dropping price. This is less of a big deal in Japan, mind you, and more of a big deal in North America where people continue to buy GBAs over DSs for being $30 cheaper.

      Not many hardcore gamers in any territory are going to want to own the system that their grandma and little sister thinks is cool. That probably sounds harsh, but that's the way 18-24 year old males think, and they make up the majority of hardcore gamers.

      My experience with siblings is the opposite--younger sisters tend to take interest in whatever the older brother is playing. People get into arguments like "I want to play the NES" "No *I* want to play the NES".

      As for the 18-24 male have-moved-out-of-the-house range, why would they care what their relatives are playing? If playing a game can get them into girl's pants, they'll do it, but otherwise they'll play whatever they like, or their dorm-mates like.

      Whether or not the Wii continues to outsell the PS3 and Xbox 360 (by whatever shrinking margin it can muster), the big problem for them is that games aren't selling, really at all.

      In North America the Wii games are selling better than PS3 games, and worse than 360 games. More 360s have been sold than Wiis in North America, and more Wiis have been sold than PS3s in North America. It's almost like install base is important after all!

      Now, yes, the 360 has a spectacular attach rate--the 360 probably having the most hardcore of the ownership bases, and having achievement points which seem to be an obsession for some people. For this reason, the Wii could pass the 360 in America and still not control the region. This doesn't mean that the clear #2 console will be ignored by developers, though (the original XBox wasn't ignored last-gen; only third place (GC) was).
    10. Re:Not surprising... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Nintendo's made no secret of trying to attract "casual gamers"

      Nor has Microsoft. I've been playing Carcassone and Eets when my poor eyeballs need a rest from a game of Space Giraffe. And of course there's always Hexic, but after racking up 50 or so hours on it, I'm a little bored of it. I'm pondering buying the full game of Zuma.

      Nintendo has a way of just dropping a console out there and demanding everyone beat down their door for the privilege of writing for it. They did it for the N64 and repeated it for the Cube. At least they still have a lock on handhelds.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    11. Re:Not surprising... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Showing my bias here, but I think the sole reason the PSP sold as much as it did was because of the FF7 game. Final Fantasy game, Japan, come on, instant #1 position!

      Tongue position: firmly in cheek.

    12. Re:Not surprising... by seebs · · Score: 1

      Games are selling pretty well when there's some games out. As Capcom has made it clear, their sales have been good enough (750k of RE4 Wii, and that's just a remake) to make them move Monster Hunter 3 from PS3 to Wii.

      This is the absolute worst time for Wii. We're getting all the "learn to use this dev kit, maybe make some minigames or something" titles that were shoveled out when all the software houses realized that it was a runaway success and tried to jump on the bandwagon. Same crap the DS has always gotten, and the PS2 got too. We will start seeing more and more of the real games that have depth and gameplay. Look at the Pro Evolution Soccer gameplay videos, showing off the best controls they've ever done, and look how excited they are. Look at Monster Hunter 3 (which looks glorious, given the hardware) moving from PS3 to Wii.

      There's enough games for people with jobs to play games on Wii all the time they have available and still have plenty left to play, and there's more coming out. No worries for me!

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    13. Re:Not surprising... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I doubt people plop down 250 for something, use it for a week, then let it sit. Even casual gamers.

      That said, I like the new controls. The standard controlers just add more and more buttons, and really pushing 10 buttons in hunderds of different sequences is just irritating. The wii controller allows me to use motion as well as button pushing to control the game.

      As far as game library goes.. are there anything but sports games and FPS' on the PS3 or 360? I hate sports games, and am tired of the FPSes.

    14. Re:Not surprising... by theoneandonlyed · · Score: 1

      I think you're on drugs. Seriously...you think people are dropping $250 on a console and *they don't even realize that you can buy other games for it*? You think people are really saying, "hey, look, this comes with Tennis and Bowling, kewl!!!"...so they buy it. And read the instructions. And hook it up to their TV, stereo, whatever. And learn how to work it. And figure out the controllers. And play it. And then, never go into a Best Buy for the rest of their lives. Never again set foot in a Blockbuster. Drop off the Internet from lack of interest (after all, they probably didn't realize that there were other websites besides MySpace). Stop talking to their neighbors, watching TV (which of course, they never realized there were other shows besides Seinfeld), reading magazines, all of that. Never, ever, does it occur to them that, just like their old Atari, and their old Intellivision, and their old NES, and their nephew's old Playstation One, and every other console in the history of the world, that they could buy other games. I guess all the console makers are in trouble then, and I'll be picking up a 360 *real cheap* after Halo 3 gets old. Seriously, WTF?!?!?

    15. Re:Not surprising... by supermank17 · · Score: 1

      Even in the 18-24 year old and hard core game crowds, I have to say that the Wii seems to still have a high appeal. I fall solidly into both categories, and so do many of my friends. And guess what, most of us have Wiis too, and really enjoy them. Yes, many of the "hardcore" games aren't on the system, and most of us have a 360 or a gaming PC (or both) for games like Halo 3 or Half Life 2 Orange box. But that doesn't mean the Wii doesn't get its play time. We all grew up playing classic games like the Metroid series, Zelda, Mario, etc. And those series are still big draws for most gamers; One of my friends is a hardcore Halo and WoW addict, and yet the moment a new Zelda game comes out he drops everything to play it. Not to mention that when we all get together, we don't play Halo, or Gears of War, or whatever else is hot on the xbox or PS3. We yank out Mario Strikers, or Raving Rabbids, or even Wii sports and have a blast. Not to mention that many of us enjoy playing video games with girlfriends or wives, and trust me, the Wii is far more likely to draw them to the TV than Halo ever is.

    16. Re:Not surprising... by LKM · · Score: 1

      It's happening. Look at the Japanese software charts, not just the hardware charts. Not a single Wii game in the top ten last week, this on supposedly the most popular console in Japan.

      Also no new releases. Look at the total sales numbers. The Wii's attach rate beats the PS3 easily. The theory that people only play Wii Sports simply does not match the numbers.

  18. Shoddy article by Felonius+Thunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without a shred of evidence, this merely echoes some other newspaper article without investigation. This is no better than an "ask slashdot". The other article apparently says Wii sales declined two months in a row, without saying if other consoles gained. I assume the Halo effect (heh) help Xbox even in Japan, so we should expect to see some spike there, but I'd be more curious to hear about sales from the studios' POV. Are there any Wii titles they were late to put on the platform that have sold better/poorer than expected? Any that outsell the other platforms' version? I suspect this kind of article is mere hope from the harder core gaming crowd, trying to blow the Wii like they had done before launch.

  19. needs more games by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

    I'll admit, I'm getting a little irritated with my Wii purchase. I've played a handful of games on it, and that's about it - there's nothing else out I want to play. Worse, the only titles coming out in the near future (within the next 6 months) that even sound halfway decent are Nintendo titles.

    Where are all the 3rd party developers?

    The DS had the same problem. Even now, most of the truly good DS games are Nintendo first-party titles (although I have a number of well-liked third-party titles on my DS). Hopefully the Wii just needs a little more time to build up a library, like the DS did.

    1. Re:needs more games by king-manic · · Score: 1


      The DS had the same problem. Even now, most of the truly good DS games are Nintendo first-party titles (although I have a number of well-liked third-party titles on my DS). Hopefully the Wii just needs a little more time to build up a library, like the DS did.


      The wii i agree but the DS? I have a library of about 30 games only 2 are Nintendo. Nintendogs (GF compelled purchase) and Super Mario. The ones I play most are either Atlus, Konami, or square. Each releasing tons of games on the DS.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:needs more games by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Where are all the 3rd party developers?

      Scrambling like crazy to change strategy after backing the wrong horse.

      EA even came out and said that they'd made a mistake in backing the PS3 over the Wii, and were hurriedly trying to start new Wii projects. However, it'll be 2008 before we start to see the results.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:needs more games by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Resident Evil? Rayman? DDR? Are those not enough? What about the Madden, Tiger Woods and upcoming Monster Hunting? The Wii doesn't have as many 3rd party games as other companies, but they exist, and more are coming.

  20. current hardware sales are a weak indicator by acidrain · · Score: 1

    It's also possible that everyone who would be buying games now has a wii and things couldn't get any better for game developers. "Installed base" is much more important than current hardware sales. And finally, *the amount of people buying wii games* is what really matters. As a developer thats all I'd look at. Anyone got the numbers for that in Japan?

    --
    -- http://thegirlorthecar.com funny dating game for guys
    1. Re:current hardware sales are a weak indicator by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I think one of the earlier commenters pointed out that the wii doesn't have a single game in Japan's top ten at the moment.

      I guess it's always possible that going after the "casual gamer" backfired, they are not the ones who are going to go out and buy a new game very often

    2. Re:current hardware sales are a weak indicator by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      In Japan the Wii sells more software than the 360 (surprise!) or the PS3; however, the top software sales are dominated by handhelds and PS2 games.

  21. I agree by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know my credibility on this issue is near zero around these parts, as I've not been afraid to state all along that the Wii is over-hyped, but I agree with the fundamental tennet of this argument; many Wiis are not getting used because there is very little on them worth playing for more than about 10 minutes at a time. Looking at the "new releases" reviews on the average game-site (IGN is my personal preference, but your mileage may vary), it's easy to see that games coming out for the Wii mainly fall into 3 categories; "party" games (or extended tech demos, as I tend to think of them), rushed and nasty cross-platform ports and virtual console games (whose quality varies from the stellar to the derisory - but which many games will have been emulating for free for years).

    The first category are ok on occasions when you have friends over, but are no use at all the rest of the time. A brief glance at gamerankings will show just how badly Wii ports of cross-platform games tend to fare. And virtual console games... well... great... but I don't want to spend all my time on my new console playing games that came out a decade ago.

    There are a tiny number of other titles which actually have some gameplay value. Zelda is ok... slightly above average for its genre. Metroid Prime 3 is pretty good, although I still have problems with the backtrackeriffic gameplay style of Metroid games. Resident Evil 4 remains one of the only two cross platform games to actually be enhanced through being on the Wii (the other being Rayman Raving Rabbids, which falls into the "insipid party games" category anyway).

    I know what people are going to say at this point; the Wii isn't for me, it's for the casual crowd. Thing is, I suspect that over time, even the average Joe will realise that, cheap though the Wii is, the limited use it eventually gets still means its horrible value for money.

    Right now, Nintendo have things pretty easy. They had an unprecedented hype-machine for the launch of the console and some excellent initial sales. However, it seems to me that for those of us in the UK, the comparison to Gordon Brown's political honeymoon as Prime Minister are most appropriate; there comes a point at which people realise there's no substance there and the wheels fall off spectacularly. Happily for Nintendo, Sony continue to shoot themselves in the foot at every opportunity. They have an excellent machine out there, which, despite the high price-tag, is significantly more future-proof than any of its competitors (especially with the Blu-Ray drive, which is looking like a better and better idea). However, because they've mismanaged their relationships with developers and insisted on pushing their horribly broken and unnecessary motion-sensing controller, they've yet to attract a significantly better range of games than the Wii (although at least the PS3 has slightly more in the way of "substantial" games).

    My instinct still stays that when all the dust settles, the slow-but-steady pace set by the 360, with no gimmicks, few headline-grabbing features, but an increasingly solid and well-rounded games lineup will win the day.

    1. Re:I agree by king-manic · · Score: 1


      My instinct still stays that when all the dust settles, the slow-but-steady pace set by the 360, with no gimmicks, few headline-grabbing features, but an increasingly solid and well-rounded games lineup will win the day.


      In the North America. Worldwide the 360 is moving like N-gages outside N.A.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:I agree by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      Someho, you fail to consider the fact that people buying the Wii are perhaps looking for something to use when friends come over. Personally, if I want to play alone, I'll just boot Windows and play on my computer. Generally deeper gameplay, better controls (mouse+AWSD ftw!), mods and add-ons (Oblivion anyone?), and grafically/audio wise, if my comp isn't on par with current consoles yet, it will probably be next year. When I buy a console, it's to play with friends, and that's where party games shine (thus the name:P, and so do beat'em up. Any type of game that can only be played solo is pointless. The Wii is a party console, with party games ... and that's probably why it's been so successfull so far. We'll have to see how it fares over christmas, but I wouldn't be surprised it the sales went up a bit again.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    3. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, I suspect that over time, even the average Joe will realise that, cheap though the Wii is, the limited use it eventually gets still means its horrible value for money.

      If you're rehearsing for the role of Captain Kirk, it was already cast.

    4. Re:I agree by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      If you read what I typed, you'd see I don't fail to take this into account at all. This is the crux of my arguments. The Wii *is* a party console. However, the infrequency with which people will have opportunities to use it as it is intended (how often do you have friends over *and* everybody has the time and inclination to fetch out a console?) means that for most "casuals", it is horrible value for money. The trendies have jumped at it and most of them have one now, but the wider mass-market probably isn't going to follow.

      The situation a year or two down the line, when the Wii is no longer a big media story, the other consoles are cheaper and the technological differences even more glaring will be much worse for Nintendo.

    5. Re:I agree by seebs · · Score: 1

      I don't know what your gaming tastes are like, but the Wii has plenty of appeal to hardcore gamers.

      Not, mind you, to college-age kids who want to impress people with how manly and old they are without having to talk to an actual girl. Just to gamers.

      See, hardcore gamers don't give a fuck about what's got the most impressive graphics, or how many polygons there are. They want to PLAY GAMES. They play games with character displays, they play games with polygons, they play games with sprites, they play whatever's got gameplay. And to gamers, the Wii is a veritable paradise right now, offering an insane variety of gameplay choices, many of them really new, some of them familiar but spiffed up a bit.

      The people whining about the Wii's "bad" selection of games are people who think that reading romance novels day in and day out, and refusing to read anything else, makes you a "hardcore reader".

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    6. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, what?

      Wii has a very weak selection of games right now, and if you can't see that, you aren't as "hardcore" as you think. Just take a look at these two links for some average review scores:
      http://www.metacritic.com/games/wii/scores/
      http://www.metacritic.com/games/xbox360/scores/

      As you can see, Wii has currently three games with a score of 90 or higher. Xbox 360 has nine. Wii has seven games with a score of 80 or higher. Xbox 360 has 71. The console that offers the best value right now is Xbox 360, hands down. The PS3 will come very strong with plenty of exclusives in 2008 and beyond though, so it's entirely possible that Sony can turn around and win another generation. Wii? Who knows. It seems developers are mostly interested in making minigames and other games for casuals. I doubt that Wii will ever have a better selection of games than either Xbox 360 or PS3 will have, but as we can see here, hype and appeal to casuals (like you) is sometimes enough.

    7. Re:I agree by seebs · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nice use of anonymous coward status!

      Reviews and a dollar won't get you a bag of chips. I don't care whether a game scores 90 or higher in someone's review list; I care whether it's fun, and for fun, the Wii has enough games.

      Does the Xbox have more? I don't know and don't care. A weak lineup is a lineup that leaves me with nothing to play. The Wii has enough games that I have never, not since launch day, had nothing to play on the Wii.

      The Xbox has a lot of highly ranked games that are the same damn shooter over and over and over, and the same racers, and the same sports games. Whatever. I played those already in the 80s.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    8. Re:I agree by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      You what?

      I'm not sure what this post is about. I'm not college-age. I haven't been for half a decade now. My gaming tastes are pretty open, for the most part. With the exception of non-driving sports games and weird Japanese hentai dating sims, I'll play more or less anything. All I want out of a game is a decent experience, be it singleplayer or multiplayer, that I can sit down with and play for more than 10 hours in total (and yes, on this metric, Halo 3 fails) without getting bored or overly frustrated. This is not a particularly "hardcore" or "softcore" aspiration. Given the price of games, it's a perfectly reasonable aim.

      Right now, the Wii spectacularly fails to deliver on this score. I think I've already named the only three games that qualify; Zelda, Metroid Prime 3 and Resident Evil 4. One slightly above average game, one decent game and one excellent port of a superb but rapidly dating game. Even the PS3, with its currently dire lineup beats this. Resistance: Fall of Man remains the best console fps I've played, despite being technically bettered by Halo 3. The 360 utterly blows the Wii's lineup out of the water.

      Of course, out of all the consoles, the one which has had the best 12 months up to now is... the PS2. God of War 2 (game of the year, in my opinion), Final Fantasy XII, Persona 3, many, many more. It's not about the hardware (although god knows this helps), it's about the games. And this is where the Wii is failing badly.

    9. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you admit that you don't actually know anything about the games available for the Xbox 360. How then do you justify calling the Wii a paradise for gamers, and saying that it's those that find the Wii lacking that are somehow the uninformed ones? It's clear that you are the one that haven't done your research. I suggest you spend some time on some Wii forums, and listen to what more informed Wii owners (more informed as they keep up to date with the gaming industry) has to say about their console. You'll quickly notice that most are disappointed in the current lineup of games, and are impatiently waiting for Galaxy and Brawl, and for things to turn around in general.

      Wii is bound to look better in a year or so though. It has had a terribly slow start game selection wise, but since the sales of the console has been so good, publishers are bound to flock to the platform. And that means more games, and hopefully not just with minigames. But making games takes a while, so we'll see in the coming year and two how this goes.

      Finally, I'd like to point out that it's very difficult to post other than anonymously when you don't have an account. Don't rag on me just because of that.

    10. Re:I agree by BrianRoach · · Score: 1

      many Wiis are not getting used because there is very little on them worth playing for more than about 10 minutes at a time

      Er, yeah ... which is one of the reasons they're popular (it's why I bought mine).

      Instead of needing to block off 3 hours of time, I can play a quick game when I get home from work, or before I hit the sack. And my wife will actually play the games on the Wii. It feels like I'm getting more use out of this console than any other one I've had, even if the "hours" don't directly compare.

      There's a lot more "casual gamers" out there than hard-core ones. Up until this particular cycle I've always bought pretty much all the consoles, or close to it. I think the only one I didn't pick up in the last 15 years was a Gamecube for some reason. This time around ... just the Wii. At some point I *might* pick up a 360, but so far between the PC and the Wii I've been pretty satisfied and haven't had an urge to go get one.

      - Roach

    11. Re:I agree by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Yup. Apart from Dead Rising, there really isn't much on the platform, well that isn't/wouldn't be better on the PC. It's everything that was on the XBox... but prettier. That's better than the PS3 can say though. I keep trying to find a reason to pick one up, and there's just nothing there.

      I'm pretty happy with the gameplay variety I've gotten on my Wii so far.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    12. Re:I agree by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      especially with the Blu-Ray drive, which is looking like a better and better idea
      It is? Specifically, how so? As far as I can tell, the only thing it was good for was raising the price into the stratosphere, which is where a lot of people place the blame for the system's lagging sales.
    13. Re:I agree by ildon · · Score: 1

      Slashdot accounts are free and take less than a minute to create.

    14. Re:I agree by Great+Beyond · · Score: 1

      The console that offers the best value right now is Xbox 360, hands down.

      Best value for the money. . . all the way up until you have to spend 6 weeks waiting for Microsoft to send you a replacment 360 because your current 360 Red Ringed on you.

    15. Re:I agree by LKM · · Score: 1

      All I want out of a game is a decent experience, be it singleplayer or multiplayer, that I can sit down with and play for more than 10 hours in total (...) without getting bored or overly frustrated. (...)
      Right now, the Wii spectacularly fails to deliver on this score. I think I've already named the only three games that qualify; Zelda, Metroid Prime 3 and Resident Evil 4.

      Super Paper Mario, Trauma Center, Mario Strikers, Excite Truck, Elebits... If you haven't already, check out some of the VC games, like A Link to the Past or Super Metroid. Yeah, the Wii doesn't have the best games selection on earth, but it's not that bad, either.

  22. Novelty, yes, burst no. by Devir · · Score: 1

    The Wii is a novelty in the sense it is new, and quite a few of the current games are novelty games. Games with minimal graphics and quick to develop and hit the shelves (monkey ball, wario ware...) and host a short short quick game play. My Wii has collected dust shortly after I bought it about 6 months ago.

    Granted, the long term of the Wii will ride on "anchor" games like the Metroid and Zelda franchises. I loved Zelda, and it looked fantastic on the Wii. Metroid P3 Is also a fantastic game. It looks great and makes amazing use of the Wii Mote. Games what these will be what will become the mainstay of the Wii and give it the holding power it needs to succeed.

    I had Neglected to mention the Resident Evil 4 port. I had the GC version and bought the Wii one when it came out. I would have to say it gave RE new life. Granted I haven't played it in quite some time, there is a good chance I'll be going back to finish Wii RE4.

    I know analysts love to pop bubbles and spew negativity at things that are succeeding, possibly to devalue the item in question. I would really have to say that while the Wii is a "Novelty bubble" now, it will, if managed right, sweep into being a mainstay console. THey just need more high production games like MEtroid, RE and Zelda. (Not those particular franchise but High quality...)

    I'll take a further step into the pointed edge of the sword and dare to say that I believe the PS3 will be here to stay as well. Sony makes stupid mistakes, that is unquestionable. But with built in Blue Ray, and upscaling/smoothing of PS2 games it has a slight edge. Sure they are releasing bargain bin PS3 with no BC but that is hopefully a market water "test". In fact for the last 3 months ownership, I've only played PS2 games on the PS3.

  23. dusty by el_coyotexdk · · Score: 1

    hmm my wii is tretty dusty, but thats just because i dont clean it :P i still use it almost everytime i have people over. girls love it, so ya!

    1. Re:dusty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I gotta say is Mario Party 8 + beer/liquor makes for an easy, interesting, changing drinking game that anyone can play.

  24. This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by machinecraig · · Score: 1

    You remember all those other game consoles that had HUGE initial success, that had a massive game lineup and huge developer support, that everybody loved - - - and then people just got sick of it and the company went out of business?

    Yeah, I don't remember any consoles like that either.

    1. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      *cough*Dreamcast*cough*

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    2. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You remember all those other game consoles that had HUGE initial success, that had a massive game lineup and huge developer support, that everybody loved - - - and then people just got sick of it and the company went out of business?"

      You mean Nintendo 64 and Dreamcast?

      Yep, I remember those.

    3. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      Neither of those companies went out of business. One just went out of consoles.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    4. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by machinecraig · · Score: 1

      See - I would argue that both the N64 and the Dreamcast were killed by consoles that had superior graphics or superior development platforms... not by hype-evaporation.

      For example:
      N64 - killed by the Playstation. Not necessarily better graphics - but it was an easier platform for folks to develop on and perhaps as a result had a much better game library.
      Dreamcast - Killed by the Playstation 2 which had much better graphics and connectivity.

      I just don't see where those 2 threats are a problem for the Wii - especially since it's not trying to compete based on graphics. Sort of how the DS is positioned against the PSP.

    5. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by orclevegam · · Score: 0

      Sega bombed out because people got sick of them releasing a new console (or expansion to a console that was required to play specific games) every 6 months, and only putting out a couple dozen games. The Genesis had a decent run, but everything after that was just insane. SegaCD, 32X (what a rip that was, it had what, all of 4 games for it), the Saturn, and the last straw the Dreamcast, which was a shame because the Dreamcast was actually a pretty good system (I still have mine). It got to the point where people said "Oh, Sega just released a new system, wonder what 10 games besides Sonic will get released before they pop out the next one".

      Now, you want to see Nintendo bomb out? Simple, have every other game released require a new $50 wiimote attachment that only works for that and maybe 1 other game. I guarantee if Nintendo did that people would balk. As it is, the Wii is doing at least as well as all the others (certainly better than the PS3). If I didn't have a gaming PC (and could stomach playing FPSes on a console) I would probably pickup a 360. As for PS3, not until the price drops to at least half what it is now.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      You don't count each mini-game individually when calculating a "massive game lineup". HTH.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by sam_paris · · Score: 1

      Playstation 2 did not have "much" better graphics than the DC.

    8. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by ddrichardson · · Score: 1

      Dreamcast - Killed by the Playstation 2 which had much better graphics and connectivity.

      The Dreamcast was killed by hype, at least in my experience working in game retail at the time. Everytime the Dreamcast had a major release or announcement Sony popped out more hype about the PS2 and people just held back for the PS2 - who could blame them, the Saturn was roundly trounced by PlayStation in the previous generation.

      Also, Dreamcast came with DreamArena and a modem as standard, they released an revised version of Dream Arena soon after to allow any ISP to be used and there was none of the need to update filling all your memory crap that some of the PS2 online games required (KillZone for example). PS2 didn't have that integrated until the slimline came out and even now I can count on one hand the number of titles I have played online on PS2.

      --
      A thistle is a fat salad for an ass's mouth...
    9. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by captain_cthulhu · · Score: 1

      had a massive game lineup and huge developer support surely you are not sarcastically referring to the Wii...
      where's this massive games list? even if you could call the Wii lineup massive, where are the games worth buying? I count 3 (including WiiSports) for my tastes and maybe 6 for everyone else. and this TFA is about nervous developers and the lack of developer support.

      I fear that the Wii will ultimately be a fad but it was cheap and having just a few great games for it will keep me from regretting my purchase.
      --
      certified elipsis abuser
    10. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by calc · · Score: 1

      Exaggerate much?

      Oct 1985 - Sega SG-1000 Mark III (~ Sega Master System)
      Oct 1998 - Sega Mega Drive (~ Genesis)
      Dec 1991 - Sega CD (Add on to MD)
      Nov 1994 - Sega Saturn
      Dec 1994 - Sega 32x (Add on to MD)
      Nov 1998 - Sega Dreamcast

      Yes, Sega had major problems with 3rd party support since the beginning with the Mark III/SMS, but no they weren't releasing systems every 6 months. Except for the Saturn/32x release that they managed to screw up by positioning too closely together they averaged a release every 3-4 years, which is a normal time span for a console. Also, the Sega CD and 32x were both just addons to the Sega Mega Drive and not consoles themselves, which in turn added to cost which helped to doom them to failure. Nintendo had originally planned on having a CD addon for the SNES as well... which later became the Sony Playstation.

    11. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      The Dreamcast was killed by hype, at least in my experience working in game retail at the time. Everytime the Dreamcast had a major release or announcement Sony popped out more hype about the PS2 and people just held back for the PS2 - who could blame them, the Saturn was roundly trounced by PlayStation in the previous generation.

      The Dreamcast was killed bad terrible internal management, at least Dreamcast in the US/CA. Also piracy hurt it. As much as DRM sucks, the cheap and easy disk-copying of the DC made it trivial to copy a $40 game. The request for retailers to take a loss on it along with sega limited it's distribution, and the decision to severely limit the number of games for it by not allowing huge numbers of Japaneses ports further hurt it. They could have been facing the management team and PR team at SCO and they would have still went belly up.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    12. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      N64 - killed by the Playstation. Not necessarily better graphics Actually the PS1 had worse graphics, and the N64 wasn't killed - it lived out a normal lifespan with good games released until the end. The N64 was vastly outsold by the PS1 because Nintendo pissed off 3rd party developers.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    13. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by Great+Beyond · · Score: 1

      N64 - killed by the Playstation. Not necessarily better graphics - but it was an easier platform for folks to develop on and perhaps as a result had a much better game library.

      Kinda of - there was also the carts vs CD price factor to figure in, and there was the poor to average game selection for the first year. Really, you could only play Shadows of the Empire for so long. All that, coupled with the long lead time for the PSX meant that the N64 was doomed from the get-go.
      Dreamcast - Killed by the Playstation 2 which had much better graphics and connectivity.

      The Death Blow to the Dreamcast? It wasn't so much the PS2 power and on-line that did it in, but Sega's reputation. There were tons of folks saying "I'll never touch a Sega console because I was burned by the constant flow of Genesis/X32/Megadrive add-ons". If people didnt stay away from the DC because of that, it might have had a fair shot at a good lifespan.

    14. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by LKM · · Score: 1

      N64 - killed by the Playstation. Not necessarily better graphics - but it was an easier platform for folks to develop on and perhaps as a result had a much better game library.

      The N64 obviously had vastly superior graphics to the PS1, and I think it was rather easy to program for.

      Dreamcast - Killed by the Playstation 2 which had much better graphics and connectivity.

      Graphics is debatable (I disagree), but better connectivity??? Wha???

    15. Re:This same exact thing happened to... nobody... by LKM · · Score: 1

      It wasn't so much the PS2 power and on-line that did it in, but Sega's reputation.

      Well, it was a number of factors. Reputation, history, Sony's hype, piracy... But yeah, reputation was important. Another console that was killed by rep was Atari's Jaguar. Back then, every magazine wrote basically "We think the Jag is the best current-gen console, but buy the 3DO instead because the Jaguar will tank, like all Atari consoles after the 2600."

      Of course, the 3DO didn't do better, either :-)

  25. ... in Japan by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    The demand has dropped in Japan because they probably have sold one to just about anyone that was likely to ever buy a TV console system. In the US, the Wii is still very hard to find. I'm looking to buy one, and have called probably 10-20 stores around work and home and none of them have them in stock. Most stores are receiving regular shipments but they sell out within a day or two.

    In other words, the Wii may be at that point in its popularity curve in Japan, but it's far from it here in the US.

  26. dusty or lusty?! by freshmayka · · Score: 1

    I read on a gamer forum that "Wii = teh sex" so... if that is indeed true, I would imagine that demand for Wii will continue to increase...

                              increase some more...

                                                            increase to a very large size...

                                                                                                                  and then rapidly decrease in size, lose all interest, and begin to feel slightly guilty for playing with the Wii that way.

  27. That's what I thought about the Dreamcast too by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that's what I thought about the Dreamcast too. I mean, who cares if it only sold a fraction of what the PS2 was selling? Mine will still work, right? And Sega will surely keep making games for it, right?

    Well, I'm proud to say, I was partially right there. My Dreamcast still works flawlessly. Hasn't had a new game made for it for a damn long time now, though.

    Seriously, the prices of developping a new game are insane these days. Actually, make it: for a decade or so now, and it's only getting worse. So they need a certain market size just to recoup the costs.

    And no matter what game you make for a console, not every single owner of that console will buy it. Doesn't matter what game it is. Even Hallo 3, not every XBox owner on the planet bought it. And that was a major success. You have to hedge your bets a bit for the case when it's a lot less of a success. I.e., you have to have a bit of a safety margin there.

    So if a bubble bursts, it can be bad news. But, hey, your own console will keep working.

    And before someone pipes up with "But Nintendo itself will keep making games for it"... well, so much good that did to the popularity of the N64, eh?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:That's what I thought about the Dreamcast too by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'm proud to say, I was partially right there. My Dreamcast still works flawlessly. Hasn't had a new game made for it for a damn long time now, though.

      Not strictly true. Hasn't had a US game made in a long time, but it's still possible to get new releases for it from Japan. At least as of a year ago, I think I heard somewhere that they finally stopped making Dreamcast games even in Japan recently.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    2. Re:That's what I thought about the Dreamcast too by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's reassuring to know. Now I regret that I never learned Japanese, though ;)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:That's what I thought about the Dreamcast too by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      But last I checked, the majority of them were dating sims. So yeah........

    4. Re:That's what I thought about the Dreamcast too by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Shoot'em ups, actually. The vast majority of new Dreamcast titles were ports from the arcade hardware that was based on the Dreamcast's specs. (i.e. The NAOMI board.) Since it's easy money, companies that use the NAOMI board in their games almost always port them to the Dreamcast home system. With shoot'em ups still extremely popular in Japan's arcades, that means that some rockin' shmups make it to the market over there.

      If you know where to look, you can easily purchase an import copy and use it on a US Dreamcast via a freely downloadable boot disk. My only warning is that these games ARE direct arcade ports. So if you're looking for a good value out of the $70 you're going to spend on an import, don't expect to find it unless you're a hardcore shmup fan. 5 levels that can be completed in about 15 minutes is only worth it if you're the type to play it again and again trying to best yourself.

  28. Sales Fluctuation by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    Combination of Halo 3 on the Xbox 360 making a killing on the console market and the pre-Christmas season spending lull. I expected a drop in console sales for any platform that didn't have a fresh killer game like Halo 3.

    Everyone I've talked to that owns a Wii is still playing the Wii sports and some of the original games, but are fully prepared to lay down some hard cash for Nintendo's holiday releases.

    I love how this gets rolled into a major fud story.

  29. Is your mom also buying new games? by LordZardoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If your mom plays the heck out of Wii Sports, that is ok for Nintendo. But if that is all your mom does with it, than things could be better. Sure, Nintendo is making a profit on every Wii sold, but they also want to make yet more money. They (and Sony and Microsoft) usually do this by getting you to keep buying new games.

    For a 3rd party publisher, the fact that your mom really likes Wii Sports does not do them much good. They did not make Wii Sports, and they sure as hell aren't getting a cut of the profits on the hardware. If 3rd party publishers cannot make successful games on the Wii, than there will be problems down the line for the Wii.

    Most 3rd party dev's were caught off guard by the Wii. In the past year, most of those that did not jump on early have only really managed a few quick and dirty port jobs. In order for the 3rd parties to do well, they have to figure out how to make games that appeal to the Wii install base.

    I am certain that the first 3rd party game that will do well on the Wii will be Guitar Hero 3. Beyond that, I am not at all sure what else is in the pipeline for the Wii from 3rd parties that will work well. I myself want more core type games (Metroid 3) to come out on that system. But if the gamers who buy those games are all on the Xbox 360, than that is where those games will come out.

    END COMMUNICATION

    1. Re:Is your mom also buying new games? by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      One challenge for Nintendo is getting news of games out to people like your mother - she should know about Wii Fitness, for example, and whatever the Wii version of Brain Age is - both are targeted at the same not-really-gamer audiences as Wii Sports.

      I think there's also going to be a delay here, though - it took developers quite a while to really grok the DS - so much so that a sane and reasonable person could have doubted that the DS was going anywhere early on, when Nintendo lacked any first party stars for the system, and nobody had really figured out a third party game for it. I remember a long period when the only decent DS game was Mario 64.

    2. Re:Is your mom also buying new games? by LKM · · Score: 1

      I am certain that the first 3rd party game that will do well on the Wii will be Guitar Hero 3.

      Both Red Steel and Rayman have sold >1 million.

  30. Does Netcraft confirm it? by smurfsurf · · Score: 1

    I don't believe any of it unless Netcraft adds the Wii to its soon-dead list.

  31. non-gamer Wii buyer expectations by icsEater · · Score: 1

    Actually this is interesting because my non-gamer friend also sold their Wii. He actually stood in line and managed to nab a Wii last Christmas. After the initial interest and curiosity died down, their 6-yrs old son (now 7), seem to enjoy the old Gamecube I lent them. I'm guessing it's because I had all the best games for the GameCube, while their Wii was limited to the Wii Sports and a handful of mediocre titles. It's all about the games you buy. There needs to be an easier way for non-gamers to learn how to choose and buy games. Right now it's more of an "appliance" or "toy" mindset. You buy it, and they're supposed to just play with it for a long time. They sold their Wii two weeks ago and bought a PS3 instead. The free demo games are a nice way for providing "unlimited" entertainment value for their son -- at least for right now.

    1. Re:non-gamer Wii buyer expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they not know the Wii has full backwards compatibility with Gamecube games? Sounds like an unneeded waste.

    2. Re:non-gamer Wii buyer expectations by eln · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the others said, Wii has great backward compatibility. We bought the Wii because it looked cool, but we have got the most bang for our buck by far by buying GameCube games for it. It's awesome to have a system where I can get the latest games every once in a while, but where I can keep myself (and my kids) interested in between those games with a huge selection of games that cost less than $20.

      Buying a Wii and then shelving it for an old GameCube is absurd. Just take the old GC controllers to use on the Wii and trash the rest of the system.

  32. The best is yet to come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly. What are the killer games for the wii? One of the biggest is a port from the gamecube (twilight princess)! One isn't even out yet (and don't tell me nobody bought a wii for Brawl...)!

    But seriously, it's a new system. The 360 and PS3 can say the same thing... but they are just hardware upgrades. The wii has an entirely new control scheme, and a new input device is a lot harder to adapt to then a bigger CPU. People have begun to take advantage of it (metroid...) but it still has lots of potential. The big example is always the whole star wars thing. Lightsabers just seem such a natural fit to the wii. The problem, of course, is that it *could* be done horribly. I was *not* looking forward to the the 50 different sword/lightsaber clones a week after the wii's release. But I haven't seen any *yet* which means they aren't rushing them out - so I hold out hope it will actually be done pretty well.

  33. Yes, but not how you meant that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone who wants one has one? I suppose you're right. I did want one, but having wasted much time trying to find one to buy, I no longer want one. Playing games on my PC is way more fun than failing to buy a Wii. And the upcoming Christmas season isn't going to make finding one any easier.

  34. Already popped for me by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

    I was one of the few that waited in line overnight to purchase one of these golden machines. Hooked it up and started playing it for a few hours. Took it down to the folks house for the holidays and everyone went nuts playing it, thought it was the best thing ever. Then the lack of any good games came along. Rayman raviing rabbids? Beat it. Zelda? Biggs? Played them to death. Wii play? Wii-suck. Harry potter was something the women loved to play. Me I got bored.

    Then I found the Xbox360, with gorgeous graphics, fast game play, and more titles than I could play for a lifetime. I've probably spent close to a grand in buying stuff for it and hooking it up to my 1080 LCDTV, and with XBLA me and the lady can play against each other when she's at her house and me at mine (chix love hexic, don't ask me why). I look at the wii and think "Man it's got such potential, but there's NOTHING worth playing on it" then I pickup the 360 and play another round of bioshock or Dynasty warriors against people around the world.

    I like my wii, wish there was more for it, and if I could sell it for $500 with 3 controllers and all the games, it'd be gone in a heartbeat.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Already popped for me by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Wow, this sounds an awful lot like something a marketing drone would churn out for press-release material. Astroturf much, or are you just that well programmed? And what the fuck does 'fast game play' mean anyway?

      I like my wii, wish there was more for it, and if I could sell it for $500 with 3 controllers and all the games, it'd be gone in a heartbeat.

      Then do it -- I'll bet you'd have no trouble finding a buyer, depending on how many games you're including with the system.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
  35. Wii don't care by Edward+Kmett · · Score: 1

    Wii don't want their shovelware. Maybe if more development houses bought into the spirit of the platform rather than try to sell us the same old crap, they'd see some money from the this miraculous new demographic that is using the Wii. Most people didn't buy a wii because they want to play [Insert Old Product Here] while waving their hands in the air, when little thought has been given to the conversion and resulting mechanics and the whole package was banged out over the weekend by an intern. And I've yet to see a title that was ported to the Wii that was as playable as it was on the original platform, so I'll wait until we have more wii-centric original games to play.

    My Wii is collecting dust, but mainly because it has been waiting for Super Mario Galaxy.

    --
    Sanity is a sandbox. I prefer the swings.
  36. Two opinions here by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    The first opinion appears to be solely based on prejudice: This thing is not for the heavy gamers.

    HEY LISTEN UP!

    1. You have not done a survey, you are just spouting out the same bullcrap PR produced by Sony and other companies, namely "our product is more expensive therefore better". You do NOT know what most serious gamers are doing, just what you personally are doing and from the fact that only about 50% of the posters here agree with you, I would assume that only about 50% of the 'serious gamers' agree with you that the Wii is not for them. While this is not a survey, it is a lot better than than blindly repeating your own impressions as if they belong to everyone.

    2. Serious gamers don't give a crap about whether their grandma or little sister also likes it. They care about the games (see other opinion below). If Nintendo comes out with some kick ass games for the Wii, that take advantage of the cool interface instead of trying to take advantage of the high end graphics, then guess what, Serious Gamers will use it.

    3. What makes you think that next year, they won't come out with a cool upgrade along the same lines that seriously boosts the popularity of the old system? Merely a new, better interface will probably be just as easy to create as creating a new game that goes with it. -------------- The other opinion is basically that people really don't care that much about the system, they care about the games. Yeah, one system might have better interface and the other better video and processing power, but the truth is that the differences between them are relatively MINOR compared to the differences between the games. That is, people would rather play a good game on a bad system than a bad game on a good system. If people were to take HALO 3 and downgrade the graphics etc. to make it work on Nintendo, People would rather play HALO 3 on Nintendo with BAD graphics than playing Tic Tac Toe on a Sony machine or an XBOX, even if it had incredibally detailed graphics and animation.

    This means that the game companies have no one but themselves to blame If in fact Wii is dropping in popularity it is because the companies failed to put out good games.

    The game is king, not the system.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Two opinions here by king-manic · · Score: 1

      1. You have not done a survey, you are just spouting out the same bullcrap PR produced by Sony and other companies, namely "our product is more expensive therefore better". You do NOT know what most serious gamers are doing, just what you personally are doing and from the fact that only about 50% of the posters here agree with you, I would assume that only about 50% of the 'serious gamers' agree with you that the Wii is not for them. While this is not a survey, it is a lot better than than blindly repeating your own impressions as if they belong to everyone. 1- A sales dip constitutes hard data, harder then a survey. Their extrapolating a bit too much but it's not just blind PR.

      2. Serious gamers don't give a crap about whether their grandma or little sister also likes it. They care about the games (see other opinion below). If Nintendo comes out with some kick ass games for the Wii, that take advantage of the cool interface instead of trying to take advantage of the high end graphics, then guess what, Serious Gamers will use it. 2- Control scheme is one part of a number of factors that makes a game fun. Many use the scheme because Nintendo will not license them otherwise but it doesn't necessarily add to the game. You also have to deal with the fact that if certain demographics get into something it repels other demographics. As soon as Grandma starts listening to elvis, elvis is no longer cool. When Grandma starts listening to Micheal Jackson, Micheal Jackson is no longer cool. etc.. So as soon as wii seem attractive to grandma it turns off "1337 h4xx0r" grandson. They just bet that grand ma and aunt yoga crazed stacy will buy more games then uncle tom and your nephew "K1ng pWn4g3".

      3. What makes you think that next year, they won't come out with a cool upgrade along the same lines that seriously boosts the popularity of the old system? Merely a new, better interface will probably be just as easy to create as creating a new game that goes with it. -------------- The other opinion is basically that people really don't care that much about the system, they care about the games. Yeah, one system might have better interface and the other better video and processing power, but the truth is that the differences between them are relatively MINOR compared to the differences between the games. That is, people would rather play a good game on a bad system than a bad game on a good system. If people were to take HALO 3 and downgrade the graphics etc. to make it work on Nintendo, People would rather play HALO 3 on Nintendo with BAD graphics than playing Tic Tac Toe on a Sony machine or an XBOX, even if it had incredibally detailed graphics and animation. 3. Never under estimate the simplicity of gamers minds. Many great games go unnoticed because they don't have enough eye candy. Many sell merely by being eye candy. For instance there is no redeeming quality to Lair except it's eye candy and perhaps it's attempt at innovating a control scheme. It still sold. Remember that sports games sell, and the only real upgrade are in stats, and graphics. Things like Katamari damacy were amazing games but don't' sell nearly as well as madden 08.

      This means that the game companies have no one but themselves to blame If in fact Wii is dropping in popularity it is because the companies failed to put out good games. no game company except Nintendo has a very large stake in the wii's success. If the wii dies it's because Nintendo failed to pitch it right to the game studios. IF it goes belly up, they can always develop for the 360, PC or PS3.
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Two opinions here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "3. What makes you think that next year, they won't come out with a cool upgrade along the same lines that seriously boosts the popularity of the old system? Merely a new, better interface will probably be just as easy to create as creating a new game that goes with it. -------------- The other opinion is basically that people really don't care that much about the system, they care about the games. Yeah, one system might have better interface and the other better video and processing power, but the truth is that the differences between them are relatively MINOR compared to the differences between the games. That is, people would rather play a good game on a bad system than a bad game on a good system. If people were to take HALO 3 and downgrade the graphics etc. to make it work on Nintendo, People would rather play HALO 3 on Nintendo with BAD graphics than playing Tic Tac Toe on a Sony machine or an XBOX, even if it had incredibally detailed graphics and animation."

      And this is precisely why Wii will fail miserably in the end. What games do you really want to play on the Wii? All I can think of is Zelda, and that's just as good in the Gamecube version. As for Prime, the graphics are unimpressive and the control scheme is innovative, but too cumbersome.

  37. Gathering Dust by r00td43m0n · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately mine has been gathering dust. I bought the Wii as soon as it came out because I was so excited to see what Nintendo was offering and experience it first hand. I enjoyed Wii Sports when the system debuted and I thought Wario was a great game that actually took advantage of the Wii's controls, but that is where my interest started to wane.

    When I started to play Twilight Princess and Resident Evil 4, I really could not get past how bad the graphics were compared to games like God of War 2 and especially Gears of War. I know graphics was something Nintendo was not mainly focusing on but RE4 for Wii barely looked as good as it did on GameCube. Not to mention a huge flood of shovelware games that companies put out because they thought any game with Wii controls would be fun, only when a handful (Wii Sports, Wario Ware, Rayman Raving Rabbits) actually used the controls well. After witnessing so many customers come into EB Games and just buy the system not to get anymore games, TFA has some validity. Many people are satisfied with Wii Sports which speaks well for Nintendo because they made a game with such lasting appeal. The big issue is that other software companies have yet to make games that are appealing in their adoption of Wii controls.

    For me the big question now is, Nintendo has the third party support, but can we see anyone else besides them that makes a game that take advantage of the controls and uses the additional graphics power in the Wii?

    1. Re:Gathering Dust by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      For me the big question now is, Nintendo has the third party support, but can we see anyone else besides them that makes a game that take advantage of the controls and uses the additional graphics power in the Wii?

      Making a game that truly uses the Wii means abandoning 360, PS3 and PC. It's a major commitment. But if you try to compromise, then you'll either end up with a half-arsed wiimake of a PS2 game, or... well, who the hell ever played Raving Rabbids on any other machine? Nintendo will always make that commitment, of course, but who else will?

      With Wii outselling just about everything there is, I reckon the Wii market is now big enough for developers to make that commitment and still turn a profit - even if the typical Wii gamer isn't the hardcore, must-play-the-latest-new-game-each-week type. It's not that nobody else can use the Wii controls right - check out Rayman, as I mentioned, and also try The Godfather - but I'm not sure they're generally prepared to invest the time and effort to really do it right, especially at the expense of other platforms.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  38. Yeah, Right... by morari · · Score: 1

    The report goes on to discuss the likelihood that many Wiis are gathering dust in owners' cupboards[...] I'll give anyone of these people $200 for their Wii. That seems fair since it's now in used condition and they never plan on using it again.
    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  39. lack of HD output makes it less appealing to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    last year I had an SDTV.

    I was in the "graphics don't matter" crowd because I honestly thought the difference between the wii and the PS3 were minimal on my set.

    I now have a 50" HDTV, and it pains me to fire up any device that is 480p on it.

    It's fuzzy.

    I'm not complaining about number of polys or texture resolution, it's just that anything I play on it looks like someone smeared vaseline on my eyes.

    I think spending an extra 2 bucks or so per console to get the native resolution up would have been a great investment, because I don't think it will have the same lasting power with 480p output being the best it can do.

    Add to it that only platform exclusives actually work well with the remote, and Nintendo could have some staying power issues. The fanboys will scream and shout that it's jsut not true, but they are probably all still using SD sets.

    Gameplay is great, and I loved my Wii the first few months, but it's been stagnant, and I've only played 2-3 games I truly enjoyed.

    1. Re:lack of HD output makes it less appealing to me by Cecil · · Score: 1

      I now have a 50" HDTV, and it pains me to fire up any device that is 480p on it.

      It's fuzzy.

      I'm not complaining about number of polys or texture resolution, it's just that anything I play on it looks like someone smeared vaseline on my eyes.


      The difference does not bother me. Noticeable, but, you know, I have a game to play, I really can't be terribly concerned with fuzzy edges as long as the game is good. Old movies are fuzzy too, it doesn't make them suck, it doesn't make them painful to watch. I guess to some people it does, but I think those people have some unresolved issues.

      Yes, you bought an expensive TV and you want to use it to its full potential, I understand that. But you can't. So get over it, and figure out a way to move past your issues and get back to enjoying the games.

    2. Re:lack of HD output makes it less appealing to me by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Yes, you bought an expensive TV and you want to use it to its full potential, I understand that. But you can't.
      Except, yeah he can. He just can't on the Wii. I tend to agree with you that gameplay is more important the graphics though(I still bust out Earthbound every now and then and that game had below average graphics even when it was released). Still, there comes a point where I think that a certain level of graphics capability is understandably expected.

      Now, whether or not the Wii falls below that level is up to opinion. Personally, I would like my next generation gaming system to take advantage of my next generation tv.
    3. Re:lack of HD output makes it less appealing to me by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      You'll also never be able to enjoy the original Star Wars trilogy in HD. You'll never see, for example, most of the MST3K series ever released in HD, nor will you see a large chunk of cult classic TV like Dr. Who. And you only have a handful of channels to watch(atm I believe I have 15).

      People who think like that have something seriously wrong with them.

      Games are about gameplay, not graphics, not audio. Anyone not of that opinion is simply wrong.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    4. Re:lack of HD output makes it less appealing to me by LKM · · Score: 1

      I have an HD beamer. Motorstorm looks excellent, but guess what, the Wii games with the component cable look okay, too. The difference is obvious, but hardly something that could keep me from enjoying Wii games.

  40. Article makes no sense by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, the PS3 has been out a similar length of time but is doing much worse, while the Wii has surpassed the XBox 360 in sales in half as much time on the market.
     
    Since the Wii allows new ways to play, games of genres that users have never considered before now seem appealing. I never bought a golf game before, but I have my first for the Wii. I would never have considered it if it were on any other system. If the Wii is gathering dust on anyone's shelf, it is because games simply can't come out fast enough to satisfy those who bought one.
     
    In my opinion, Wii seems to have many more games worth owning and playing compared to the other two. Personally I have all three consoles, with 22 games for the Wii, 4 for the XBox 360, and 2 for the PS3. I just have seen more high profile titles of multiple genres on the shelves that are worth buying for the Wii.

    Wii: Trauma Center, Excite Truck, Super Monkey Ball, Super Paper Mario, Metroid Prime 3, Resident Evil 4, Need For Speed: Carbon, Godfather: Black Hand Edition, Sonic & Secret Rings, Wii Play, Wii Sports, Wario Ware Smooth Moves, Rayman Raving Rabbids, Call of Duty 3, Zelda: Twilight Princess, Tiger Woods, Dragon Ball Z Budokai Tenkaichi, Elebits, Spongebob Squarepants, SSX Blur, TMNT

    Xbox 360: Bioshock, Burnout, Halo 3, Ridge Racer 6

    PS3: Virtua Fighter 5, Ridge Racer 7

    I still have to get other games for the Wii... Cooking Mama, Scarface, Mario Strikers, Mario Party, Zack & Wiki, there's probably more... Honestly, how are people bored? I admit there could be some longer games for the Wii, but considering it's on its first year, and considering the games actually worth playing on other consoles, what could there be to be upset about?

    1. Re:Article makes no sense by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      I still have to get other games for the Wii... Cooking Mama, Scarface, Mario Strikers, Mario Party, Zack & Wiki, there's probably more... Honestly, how are people bored? I admit there could be some longer games for the Wii, but considering it's on its first year, and considering the games actually worth playing on other consoles, what could there be to be upset about?
      I feel the same way. People talk about the "casual gamer" and the "hardcore" and how this generation of consoles really emphasizes the differences. The definitions of these categories in my view is that the former plays games as one form of entertainment out of many, and for the latter, video gaming is their primary leisure activity.

      If you are burning through the major game releases in one weekend after it's released, then I absolutely agree that the Wii, at present, isn't going to be enough to satisfy you.

      For the rest of us, though, just because the Wii goes a week without being turned on doesn't mean that it is "gathering dust" or that it has no value. Most of the Wii owners don't play every day. For me, the good games are still coming out too fast for me to play them all. (Especially since it took me nine months to get the console in the first place so I got way behind).

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
  41. tfa vs vgchartz by pokerdad · · Score: 1

    The report goes on to discuss the likelihood that many Wiis are gathering dust in owners' cupboards, citing one software house president as saying, "People bought it out of curiosity, and it's likely a lot of them haven't used it."

    Since the article wants to use Japan's sales numbers, let's look at Japan's sales numbers. The total HW sold by the Wii was more than any other non-portable console. The total SW sold for the Wii was more than any other non-portable console other than the PS2.

    This article, like many anti-wii opinions expressed on Slashdot, is just someone who doesn't like the Wii figuring that because he doesn't like it, because his is gathering dust, that everyone's must be.

  42. The Wii needs more casual games. Seriously. by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    If your mom plays the heck out of Wii Sports, that is ok for Nintendo. But if that is all your mom does with it, than things could be better. Sure, Nintendo is making a profit on every Wii sold, but they also want to make yet more money. They (and Sony and Microsoft) usually do this by getting you to keep buying new games.

    I am certain that the first 3rd party game that will do well on the Wii will be Guitar Hero 3. Beyond that, I am not at all sure what else is in the pipeline for the Wii from 3rd parties that will work well.

    I agree that GH3 will sell best from 3rd parties, but you also touched upon the problem. What do 3rd parties have in the wings to cater to "your mom" or other casual gamers? Stuff like WiiSports, or Karaoke, or WiiFit will appeal to casual gamers, but if you look at the game lineup (even on the VC) there are VERY FEW games targeted in that direction. Nintendo captured a new audience, but even they have failed to capitalize on this market.

    1. Re:The Wii needs more casual games. Seriously. by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      WiiWare can completely turn this around, there are tons of casual games in the pipe. The problem is that Nintendo can't figure out how to get people to actually hook their machines up to the internet. Most Wii owners have broadband but a large majority of them have never put their machine online. That's a major obstacle for Nintendo and they are now starting an internet connectivity initiative to try to overcome this. Watch Iwata's keynote, it's quite illuminating.

      http://www.irwebcasting.com/071010/53/f078bbc3f8/main/index_hi.htm

      --
      +0 Meh
    2. Re:The Wii needs more casual games. Seriously. by kiddygrinder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they wanted people to go online with it they should have put a fucking ethernet jack on it. sorry, just bitter, my wireless router sucks.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    3. Re:The Wii needs more casual games. Seriously. by LKM · · Score: 1

      I think they did the right thing by going wifi by default instead of ethernet by default. There's an Ethernet adapter you can buy, if you prefer Ethernet.

  43. seems like fud to me by unity100 · · Score: 1

    im a long time gamer, since 1982 when i was just 7, and have been playing "heavy" games like rts, rpg and mmos for the duration, but even i am thinking of acquiring a wii just for chilling out factor.

  44. What a load of schlock by vonPoonBurGer · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I think the slump in sales is something akin to the one that appeared in Xbox 360 sales prior to the release of Halo 3, or more accurately it's similar to the low sales experienced by the 360 this time last year, before its big Xmas uptick in sales. It's the usual doldrum between when the console hits the ground and when the games catch up. Because most 3rd party developers took a "wait and see" approach to the system, most were pretty late in starting their projects for the Wii. We're not going to see a lot of the more interesting 3rd-party Wii titles until 2008 as a result. Given that most games take one to three years to complete, and most developers and publishers didn't start their Wii projects until after a few months of sales data was available, we're just starting to see the leading edge of the 3rd party wave now, and most of the top-tier 3rd party titles won't show up until next year. That's hardly going to kill the platform, there are nearly 13 million Wii systems sold and they can't be unsold. At most it will slow down the growth of the install base, which is still the most common console among this generation, at least for now.

    As for people saying that the Japanese market is "saturated" with Wii systems, hardly. The PS2 sold over 20 million units in Japan, so clearly there's more potential sales in the Japanese market than the 3.66 million units currently sold. The analysts are obsessing over weekly numbers and not looking at the bigger picture. The Wii has sold in one year what it took Microsoft two years to do with the 360. It's almost managed to sell in a single year the total number of GameCube's sold in that system's entire lifespan. Its sales rate is comparable to the PS2 in the first year of its lifespan. And as I already said, for now it's the most common current-gen console. The delay in 3rd party support, and its focus on a wider audience, will likely prevent it from achieving a PS2 level of dominance, but the platform itself is here to stay.

  45. Too Many Lame Games for the Wii by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

    I don't mean this as flamebait. I managed to get my hands on a Wii last February and I love it. I have bought a few games, though, and pretty much every one of them has been lame. The one exception is Zelda. And Rayman is OK. But all in all, I think the game publishers are shooting themselves in the foot. I can tell you now that I am much slower to buy any games and will be renting them first just to weed out the bad ones.

    Game publishers shrugged off the Wii for the 360 and PS3 only to see the Wii go nuts while the 360 and PS3 mired. So too many of them have been rushing titles to market that aren't well designed, aren't fun, are nearly just demos, don't play well, etc. (See Smooth Moves, Brunswick Bowling, Sonic & Secret Rings, etc. if you don't believe me).

    I think in general that the better games aren't yet on the market. As the Wii finds its audience and the game publishers learn how to actually use a Wiimote as an input device, and get stung with a few titles that just sit on the shelves, we'll see some better games. Until then, I'll just keep playing bowling - it's one of the best games on any platform in my opinion.

  46. Backward compatibilitii by tepples · · Score: 1

    He actually stood in line and managed to nab a Wii last Christmas. After the initial interest and curiosity died down, their 6-yrs old son (now 7), seem to enjoy the old Gamecube I lent them. I'm guessing it's because I had all the best games for the GameCube Wii plays over 99 percent of GameCube discs. Why didn't you just lend them a controller? Or are you counting Game Boy Color and Game Boy Advance games through the Game Boy Player accessory in the GameCube total?
  47. Metroid Prime 3 by metamatic · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, Metroid Prime 3 has substantially less backtracking than the two previous installments.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  48. Trying to Sound Important by SonicTheDeadFrog · · Score: 1

    Speculating that the so-called "Bubble" is about to burst is probably more likely to become a self-fulfilling prophesy than anything. This is really just some high-brow writer trying to ask a question he thinks is provocative, when in reality, it's about as irrelevant as questions come. If the Wii is losing popularity, then it is, if it's not then it isn't and neither thing is going to change the fact that the little white box is now in more homes than any other present generation system just itching for new software that every development house and some that aren't even invented yet are drooling to make. Furthermore when most people see a box gathering dust, they start looking for ways to make their investment useful and are just as likely to start buying more games as to get off the Wii bandwagon.

    Personally I've been playing my XBOX 360 more than anything recently, but I don't attribute this to any failing or waning popularity on the part of the Wii. I attribute this to the fact that the XBOX has been out for two years now and finally started to hit its stride. Developers have finally reached the point where they can start delivering on their promises. In the year prior to this one my XBOX 360 was gathering dust just like the Wii is now and the inane speculation was that the 360 had passed its peak because it was gathering dust. Does anybody think that now?

    Give the Wii another year and see if anybody is still saying that it's heyday is over. The reality is, it hasn't even really started. And look at the really big games this Christmas, the 360s biggest potential seller is Mass Effect, and the Wii has Super Mario Galaxy. Does anyone seriously think that Mass Effect, awesome though I'm sure it will be, will sell even half as many copies of Super Mario Galaxy? My prediction is that Wii will still be outselling PS3 and 360 combined in both hardware and software.

  49. A bit biased are we? by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

    wii, !valid, msfanboy, flamebait, !reality (tagging beta) Glad to see that /.ers are open to new ideas. Seriously people, the article isn't even saying that the Wii is going to fail, just discussing the possibility of it. Could this place be any more fanboyish?
    1. Re:A bit biased are we? by seebs · · Score: 1

      It's discussing the "possibility" based on completely unevidenced speculation. This guy I know heard some other guy say that he could imagine that maybe some people don't play with their Wiis anymore. Also, in one of the slowest commercial periods in Japan, the Wii's sales are slightly down.

      DISASTER HAS STRUCK!

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    2. Re:A bit biased are we? by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      It's discussing the "possibility" based on completely unevidenced speculation. It's not completely without evidence, and even if it is so what? Why are so many people in the /. community so fixated on the Wii's success? They can't even entertain the idea that something bad could happen to it. You can't even have an intelligent discussion about it. The whole reason I come to /. is for the comments, the good ones that is. But on the subject of the Wii they don't even exist. The minute you so much as breach the topic the fanboys come out of the woodwork to squelch any negative commentary about the Wii and to hype up any positive commentary.

      I have nothing against the Wii. I own one myself, and I love it. However, it's almost not even worth talking about it anywhere on the Internet because the conversations are so completely one sided.
    3. Re:A bit biased are we? by seebs · · Score: 1

      I can entertain the notion of something bad happening, but I'd want to talk about things we have some kind of evidence for. "What if third parties never start putting real effort in and keep producing shovelware" would be an excellent concern to raise, because there's substantial evidence that third parties are just blowing off development.

      "What if suddenly the laws of physics change, and Wii systems start overheating because 19W becomes a lot" is not a realistic concern.

      "What if all these people are secretly not buying games, even though games are selling well, but somehow they aren't selling to actual owners, and actual owners never play the system anymore and won't buy games" is closer to the physics thing than the third party shovelware thing.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    4. Re:A bit biased are we? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that when Slashdot Games just started, before the Wii came out (Revolution was a much better name, BTW!), the Slashdot collective opinion was just as excited for the Gamecube, even though the Gamecube was a clear loser last generation.

      I don't get where the Nintendo bias comes from, personally, except that a lot of Slashdotters seem pretty crotchety when it comes to computers... I get the impression that a lot of people here wish technology had just stopped in the early 90s, and they simply dislike anything that deviates from that mold. Thus the focus on CLI environments, complaining about 'bloat' (features!) in software products, liking the Nintendo's simplier/crummier but more purpose-focused hardware, etc.

    5. Re:A bit biased are we? by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      More the age base and US-centric nature of the site versus the rest of the gaming community. The majority of slashdot are NES/Atari era people, so there's a softspot(or if not console-based, PCs) towards what you grew up on. The majority of the rest of the gaming community are playstation, or xbox era.

      The gamecube was a work of art design wise compared to either of it's competitors. I don't see why you'd call it crummy.

      Also CLIs/shells are just better for remote/server work, and features at the expense of performance and bug fixes have always bothered computer users.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    6. Re:A bit biased are we? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The gamecube was a work of art design wise compared to either of it's competitors. I don't see why you'd call it crummy.

      Because it had about 4 good games the entire lifetime of the system? Because it came out at the same time as the Xbox, but was barely more powerful than the (relatively ancient) PS2? Because it was the only console on the market that had no online play and couldn't play DVDs? Because the wacky disk they used instead of DVDs could only hold 1.5 GB, so cross-platform ports had to be trimmed down for Gamecube? Because it's weird top-loading disk system meant it didn't fit in a lot of people's entertainment centers?

    7. Re:A bit biased are we? by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      What does software have to do with hardware? The Gamecube hardware was awesome. It was the cheapest to produce, 2nd easiest to code for, and 2nd most powerful hardware of its generation. Its optical drive pretty much made it have 0 load times. It had a network adapter, no one really used it, but that's not the hardware's fault.

      It was top-loading(like the slimline PS2 which followed) and couldn't play DVDs. Man, what a piece of shit.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    8. Re:A bit biased are we? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What does software have to do with hardware?

      The hardware determines the size of the disk, for one. But I was pointing out general reasons the Gamecube was kind of crappy, I didn't say "only the hardware" was crappy or "only the software" was crappy.

    9. Re:A bit biased are we? by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      No you said originally, and I quote, "Nintendo's simplier/crummier but more purpose-focused hardware" which implies the hardware sucks. And it didn't.

      I happen to disagree about the software, but that's a matter of opinion.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
  50. bad dust analogy by cerelib · · Score: 1

    For all of you gamers with any console, go give it a good finger swipe on the top to see how much dust is there. Especially if you have a system that is front-loading. Most people don't move their consoles and most people are too lazy or apathetic to bother dusting it. I was recently at a friends house and saw how much dust was on top of his Xbox. It was pretty ridiculous. So the lesson here is; don't relate a system's popularity with the amount of dust on them.

    1. Re:bad dust analogy by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Humor circuits: upgrade recommended

      You are aware that "gathering dust" is a figure of speech are you not?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:bad dust analogy by cerelib · · Score: 1

      I am aware that it is a figure of speech. The point of my post is that it is a bad figure of speech in this case because even systems that are used daily gather layers of dust. The title of my post was "bad dust analogy", but perhaps it should have been "bad dust figure of speech" instead. I also thought it would be funny to give a reason for some of the gamers here to discover the the thick layer of dust on the top of their consoles.

    3. Re:bad dust analogy by LKM · · Score: 1

      Also, the dust on my black PS3 is much more obvious than the dust on my white Wii. So there!

  51. Not True by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That isn't true with regards to the Xbox. They did 155K in May, 170K in July, 276K in August. September is expected to be higher and I'm sure the trend will continue till Jan. Here is a nice chart for you. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20070914235723.html

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Not True by metroid+composite · · Score: 1

      Ah, good point--I forgot about August. I was thinking more in terms of Apr/2007, May/2007, Jun/2007, July/2007 being four of the six lowest months on record for the system.

  52. Wii interest will increase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect interest in the Wii to double or even triple in the next year or so. The Wii is the market leader and in the eyes of the casual public, the most refreshing and different gaming system to come out in a LONG time.

  53. Games, or Game Discs? by tepples · · Score: 1

    but your games per console for the Wii is the lowest of the three 'next gen' consoles. Are you counting Xbox Live Arcade and Wii Shop Channel in your statistics or not?
  54. Dust? Sales are up to 4:1 Wii:PS3 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Lol.

    Look, part of the group that bought the Wii are casual gamers.

    Casual. As in not every day.

    To be frank, that's the market.

    Now, a better question would be, when HDTV gains majority market share of the TV base in 2009, will this impact Wii sales?

    That is much more relevant. Will Nintendo have a new console out in time? Will Sony continue to ignore reality? Will Microsoft achieve total dominance with the vBox (successor to the HDTV-enabling xBox360)? name is my suggestion

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Dust? Sales are up to 4:1 Wii:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know that casual gamers shouldn't own game consoles.

      After all, think of the poor dust bunnies!

      Why, they even have a game for the Wii involving those poor creatures - Rayman's Raving Rabbids.

  55. Re:Wii don't care or why Super Mario Galaxy r00lz by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    My Wii is collecting dust, but mainly because it has been waiting for Super Mario Galaxy.

    You need to get the chiba-influenced MySims for your Wii.

    It's really cool.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  56. Not me... by MBMarduk · · Score: 1

    I'm in no hurry to buy a Wii but I know for sure that I will be buying one at some point in the future.
    I had the Wii on my must-buy list around the same time the pre-launch frenzy was nearing its peak.
    If only for Paper Mario. Damn those gameplay vids rock!

  57. Availability is still poor in the UK by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Given the glut of PS3s and XBox 360s and lack of Wiis, I would say it doesn't look like it's declining just yet.

    It appeal to the more casual gamers, the Wii's titles are different to other systems. People who have a Wii aren't interested in spending hours alone playing online games.

  58. Re: $300 PS3 bundle. by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    Most people are probably like me and would love to own a PS3. Just as soon as the price drops below $300 for the system, a game, and a controller.

    Given how poorly they've been selling, you can probably get that bundle for Holiday 2008. It will of course have a 5 gig hard drive, Only support Wired Controllers and only has 1 USB slot. (but it'll be a "next gen" USB slot)

  59. I'm in that group.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted one the second they announced the controller. Bought one at launch, and have played maybe a total of 20 hours in the last year. There just isn't anything fun to play. It's a bunch of crappy party games, ports and remakes. I haven't bought a game since the Paper Mario mistake...

  60. yeah, right. Just wait for Star Wars... by w4rl5ck · · Score: 1

    I know a lot of people who will *instantly* buy a wii when the first (good) Star Wars game hits the market. Shooter, that is.

    And yes, I'm one of them. So it might be a little bit early to say "that's it" ...

  61. Statistical Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many Wiis are gathering dust 99.9% of those Wiis are owned by slashdotters!
  62. Probably redundant by now but by guspasho · · Score: 1

    By my recollection the media has been pulling stories like this out of their ass for years. They've been talking about the "Wii bubble about to burst" since before it arrived on the market.

    If Wii sales ever start to fall, or if the Wii is going to become less competitive relative to the PS3 and Xbox 360, it isn't going to be this winter. Look at the veritable fuckton of games that are being released for the Wii between now and December.

    http://gonintendo.com/?p=26233#more-26233

    Compare that to the launch lineup it had last year, which wasn't exactly stellar but was probably better than what the PS3 and Xbox 360 had at launch, and it's clear the games lineup Nintendo has for the Wii this winter is going to sustain its popularity, if not catapult it.

    1. Re:Probably redundant by now but by myz24 · · Score: 1

      I believe the word you're looking for is 'megaton' which seems to be as over used on nintendo sites as rumors of it's demise are any where else.

  63. Apparently you should try games before complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apparently Trauma Centre: Second Opinion is just far too fiddly"

    No. Go rent it, the controls are great, its easier than the original for the DS.

  64. I sort of agree by Sir_Sri · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have a Wii, I have a 360, and a PS3. In order of use, PS3>>>>Wii>>360. Why? Well in short, games I play. The PS3 has backwards compat for a lot of PS1, PS2 titles I never played and a tiny handful of new stuff that was fun. The Wii has Zelda, Metroid, and some mario stuff, the VC is good, but really some of that stuff is just too old for my taste (and I think for the common gamer). Not a bad showing to be sure, but not the huge obsessive products like GTA, FF, etc... The 360 is a piece of shit that runs Halo. Granted, Halo will sell a lot of green coloured pieces of shit, but they're still pieces of shit. Or maybe the new versions aren't, either way, now that Mass effect has gone the way of EA I don't see much keep the 360 for.

  65. Casual Gamers play games ... Casually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are people expecting the "casual gamer" crowd to play games all the time? Someone like my Mom and Dad will play the games from time to time, when they are in the mood, but they will also sometimes go a few months not even plugging it in.

    Thats what makes them 'casual gamers'.

    If they were hardcore gamers, then it would be a suprise if they didnt play anything for 6 weeks. I just don't see the suprise factor here.

  66. your answer? try eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When eBay has more consoles for cheap you'll know
    Now how hard was that? sheesh

  67. Wii games are (or should be) different by dublin · · Score: 0

    First off, I'm not a typical game console guy - the Wii is the first game console I've ever liked enough to buy (excluding the already antique Atari 2600 my son bought about two years ago, which is also much more fun than most modern video games...)

    Like a lot of Wii customers, one big reason I never bought any other console was that the games hold little to no appeal.

    The Wii is fundamentally different, by design. No one thinks Wii Sports has great graphics, but *lots* of people will line up to play it. Case in point: There was an active, mixed crowd surrounding the bigscreen Wii at the big Captain Morgan's "Crewsade" parties here in Austin just a couple of weeks ago. No other console (or game) could hope to draw that kind of crowd. Cheesy graphics can be *fun*.

    Active games that really use the Wii's unique capabilities will be huge hits. Lame ports of games aimed a the "traditional gamer" crowd will fail miserably. Almost all of the Wii's "grow the market" buyers, like myself, didn't buy previous consoles for one over-riding reason: we don't like playing those games. Games that require you to "earn" your way through stupidly jumping through hoops a zillion times until you get it right will fail in the Wii marketplace, but *fun* games, like the best of the Wii games, will do *very* well, especially because the Wii is really (IMO) the first effective "social" gaming platform for people with actual social skills. ;-)

    In short, the problem is gamers, and the fact that most game programmers are gamers, so they crank out the kind of gamer-think crap that Wii buyers never wanted, and won't ever buy.

    The Wii will probably eventually be a stunninng success, but that means game developers (or other programmers that "get" the Wii) are going to have to start writing Wii-only (or at least Wii-centric) games that *really* leverage the console's unique capabilities. Wii games with the graphics of Blazing Angels (which for all its warts, at least shows the Wii can do decent graphics) and the gameplay/fun quotient of Wii Sports, especially for multiple players, are certain to be hits. Sadly, we're still waiting for those... (BTW: avoiding the whole dark goth theme would be a good idea, since this is one thing that made previous games and consoles unappealing...)

    Oh, and how about using Mii definitions to drive higher-res Mii renderings for more serious-looking games? Why has no one done this? If I were in a gaming company, that's just one of many innovative changes I'd make to leverage the Wii platform. Tehre's gobs of potential there, just waiting to be unleashed...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    1. Re:Wii games are (or should be) different by nuzak · · Score: 1

      In short, the problem is gamers, and the fact that most game programmers are gamers, so they crank out the kind of gamer-think crap that Wii buyers never wanted, and won't ever buy.

      I've coined a new word:

      Wiilitism: (noun) The tendency of those promoting the Nintendo Wii® game console to refer to the "casual gamer" as a special and elevated class, specifically as a superior class in comparison to the "hardcore gamer".

      That's right, game programmers are the ones that design, produce, and market all games. But only the "hardcore" ones.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:Wii games are (or should be) different by Eivind · · Score: 1

      The Wii doesn't really -have- any "unique capabilities" though.

      It has a novel input-device. But similar devices could trivially be added to any of the other current-gen consoles.

      Witness how several games that require you to buy a special-purpose controller have nevertheless been huge successes. Singstar. Guitar Hero. Buzz. Eye-toy games. Various DDR-clones.

    3. Re:Wii games are (or should be) different by LKM · · Score: 1

      But similar devices could trivially be added to any of the other current-gen consoles.
      1. So far, they haven't
      2. Even if they had, games could not rely on the controller being there, so we'd get very few games, see the examples you've mentioned

      So yeah, the Wii does have unique capabilities after all.

  68. wii know why by cpt.hugenstein · · Score: 1

    Polularity to end due to lack of fucking games. I play a lot more VC than I do wii games.

    And when is Earthbound out for VC damnit

    1. Re:wii know why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earthbound Earthbound Earthbound Earthbound...

      If Nintendo added a GBA emulator to VC and translated Earthbound 3, I'd be in heaven.

    2. Re:wii know why by cpt.hugenstein · · Score: 1

      You wont need the emulator soon http://mother3.fobby.net/ Mother 3 fan translation to legally patch import gba cart

  69. WAAAAAAHHHHHH I have a $600 paper weight!!!! by engfant · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's all it is. CRYBABIES that can't STAND that Nintendo once again is the winner. WAAAAHHHHH I PAID ALL THIS MONEY TO WATCH A LOADING SCREEN!!!! WAAAAAHHHHHH Hard core gamers? F the "hard core gamers". That's BS. I've been gaming since Atari 2600 and I PLAY NINTENDO. That's it. Hard core gamer = NO LIFE LOSERS THAT BITCH AND MOAN TOO MUCH.

  70. ...and nobody wants the iPhone. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Move on, nothing to see here. This "story" was most likely planted by Sony (or even Microsoft) to try to cool down the public's enthusiasm for the Wii. This is exactly the same thing we saw earlier this year when Microsoft and others were trying to convince anyone who would listen (including themselves) that nobody would want the iPhone.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  71. Article is right by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

    My former roommate had a Wii, and honestly after the first week of playing with it, we went back to our PCs. This guy was a big Nintendo fan, owned every previous console and played all the in-house developed games. He couldn't bring himself to play Zelda: Twilight Princess or Warioware Smooth Moves (which prior to purchase he had claimed were completely awesome). After I played both games to the point of boredom we really quit doing anything with the poor little guy except surf the internet (YouTube TV was a fun hobby for a while) and play the Virtual Console games, which we could've used an emulator for on our PCs (and not have to wait for Nintendo to release a title we want to play, at that). So from experience I can say we didn't play that thing nearly as much as we thought we would before we bought it.

  72. If they had a few more games... by Fontaigne · · Score: 1

    For those of us who have beaten everything we care to play (please see Zelda,) the Wii is sitting around and collecting dust. A little variety is necessary.

  73. what really matters by slashdotjunker · · Score: 1

    Who cares how much they play with the Wii. There's only one thing that matters.

    Are they satisfied with their purchase and will they buy a Wii2?

  74. the upcoming game buying bonanza... by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

    ...of weirdbeard's wii is going to be somewhat crazy.
    Guitar Hero III
    Mario Galaxy
    Geometry Wars Galaxies
    the zelda-zapper game thing,
    Mario Kart (whenever it actaully comes out)

    yeah, this really sounds like the bubble is going to burst...
    how is early fall supposed to be anything other than slow for any sector of retail?
    Its the lull before the late-fall --> christmas shopping season.

    Japan can buy less videogames all it wants, that doestn change the fact that i'll be spending like $350 on games in the next few months, and thats ignoring virtual console games.
    This is a bunch of FUD

    --
    Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
  75. and? by hitmark · · Score: 1

    nintendo has made money from day one from their sales.

    now they can sit back and watch the cash trickle in some more after the initial deluge.

    microsoft and sony on the other hand will only see (potential) profit when they get some games that the majority of the owners of their console wants. for microsoft, thats already happening to some degree. for sony, that will be the next final fantasy, metal gear solid, and most likely one or more that i have forgotten about.

    remember, those two sell their console at a loss, nintendo does not.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  76. Conjecture? by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    I didn't know conjecture constituted news. You could easily figure this out by asking Nintendo how many Wii's have gone online in the last week.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  77. Yo motha fscka say WIIIIIIII by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    I have a Wii console sitting within arm's reach. Due to work demands, I haven't turned it on in three whole days, the longest span of inactivity since I bought it about two and a half months ago. When I get tired of the games I have, I will do a little research (namely, what's better on the Wii than on any other console, and a good game to start with) and have another couple months to enjoy.

    The Wii appeals to a market segment that otherwise would not be gamers at all, because so many of the games have a "grip it and rip it" approach. You don't have to learn to use the console and can concentrate immediately on learning to play whatever the game is. As long as the focus is on those games that cater to the strengths of the Wii (namely, the controllers), I don't see the popularity going anywhere unless or until the market is saturated.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  78. Then sell it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wii (sometimes plus a nunchuk) is currently being offered on Amazon.com and E-bay for $100-150 over its list price. So it seems that many people are stilling will to pay a mark-up for one of them, at least in the US.

  79. anyone wanna Wii? by huckda · · Score: 1

    I don't have time to play mine...curse this thing called REAL LIFE!

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  80. Obvious by PhaedrusLysias · · Score: 1

    Of course the Wii hasn't been selling recently! Halo 3 came out, what, 3 weeks ago? Who's going to try to compete with that?

  81. Gamecube worth keeping in addition to the Wii... by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    Buying a Wii and then shelving it for an old GameCube is absurd. Just take the old GC controllers to use on the Wii and trash the rest of the system.

    Don't trash the rest of the GC. You can get a Gameboy player used for like $20 now, and there are TONS of GBA, GBC, and original GB games worth playing. On that note, The GC with a GB player can play EVERY Zelda made except the recently released Phantom Hourglass, (and the dreadfull CD-i games). I still actively play my Gamecube because of this.

  82. FPS, FPA, FPRPG, OMGWTFBBQ!? by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    Now, I'm being a bit of a hypocrite because I don't personally feel like it's a REAL fps unless you have a keyboard and mouse (I never got into consoles), but logically, if it's mostly first person and mostly shooting, I think you pretty much have to put it in the FPS category, even if it does overlap with other genres a bit.

    If you played a Non-Melee character in Oblivion, and specialized in either Ranged Magic, or Ranged Weapons then would that make it an FPS?

    Also Try Metroid Prime 3. I'd say it's the superior FPS setup. Better than Dual analog, and yes, better than Keyboard and mouse. The (left) Analog stick beats the crap out of WASD for motion, the controller as a gun is nearly as quick and precise (I said nearly, but it's close) as a mouse, and the motion controls used to rip a shield out of an enemy's hands (via the "Grapple gun") then blasting them with your gun offers a level of visceral immersion not available in other systems/ set ups.

    I don't think Metroid Prime 3 is a true FPS either (It's an adventure/platformer, really), but I would LOVE a FPS using the Metroid Prime 3 engine / universe to come out.

  83. Brought to you... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    This is brought to you by the same school that says Apple is dying and BSD is dead. Oh well.

    For me the biggest issue with Wii is the lack of new games. I am waiting in anticipation for Mario Galaxy, Mario Kart and possibly some good RPGS. The other issue that needs to get sorted, is that the friend code system sucks (not the target audience - whatever) and there isn't much in the way of network game. In general I am happy with the Wii, but I believe the blame is currently on the software companies.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  84. Wii still Play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We play the party games with friends now and then, the 2 player mini games once in a while, and we played lots of Zelda.
    I'm holding out till xmas for Metroid Prime and I want Super Mario Galaxy too. So what if Nintendo makes all the good games for their consoles? I just want fun games.
    And maybe the SquareEnix stuff will be good for Wii later on, they're supposed to be doing final fantasy multi-platform.

  85. Where are the network games!?? by Stone316 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a Wii and I barely play it.. My kids play it every now and then but days (weeks?) go by without it being turned on. My son continues to play his gamecube more. Why don't I play it more? I can't stand playing against AI.. I want to play real people and 1 year later where are the network games?!? Are there any?? I think there are a couple like the Pokemon one and I heard Call of Duty or some such is coming out in a few months with game play up to 16 people. The Wii has alot of potential but if they keep focusing on party games and things like Wii Fit, then people are going to get tired of it.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Where are the network games!?? by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      Uhm... have you seen the upcoming games list? Not all party games. Not only WiiFit. Try Mario Strikers for online. Other than that, you are right, there aren't many. They are coming though. The PS2 is still surviving... does that have a lot of network games?

    2. Re:Where are the network games!?? by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      Personally as a college student I like having the party games, none of them are complicated and if we have people over its very eazy to throw in drinking in to any of the games, and these games are so easy to learn that anyone can pick them up and start playing with very little hassle. On that note I loved Zelda but the games that have me keep coming back are Wii Sports, and the other "Party Games" because they just look like so much fun to other people. Personally, if I want to play a in depth game I'll just play it on the PC.

    3. Re:Where are the network games!?? by LKM · · Score: 1

      There are a few online games, try Mario Football. Personally, I don't want to give up local four-player multiplayer for online gaming, like many PS3 games are doing (Motorstorm, I'm looking at you). I prefer local multiplayer.

  86. Oh, piss off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The console is expensive if you buy a controller, and the games are also. They look like shit and are short on innovation, unlike Locoroco. No wonder nobody's buying them.

  87. Reason for sales drop by navtal · · Score: 1

    First of all sales have dropped because all gamers have one now...ok maybe not but it's a nice thought.

    Secondly consoles arn't the money makers. The game sales would be a much better representation!

  88. True yet not true by CrazySpence · · Score: 1

    I have had a Wii since february and it tends to have bursts where I use it like crazy for a month then don't touch it for a month when I got it I used it constantly for a month then I stopped for about 1.5 months. then I bought a whole bunch of VC titles and played them straight for a month then stopped for another month, then I got paper mario and that was a sweet 3 weeks then Super metroid came out on the VC and did I ever play that but once again I stopped for a month. So yes it experiences "Dust" periods but Nintendo has been releasing content to bring me back and I like the casual aspect of it and how it doesn't own my life. The wii is not going to go anywhere it is just a different genre of console and market where people casually pick up a wii-mote from time to time. Different, Not dieing. :)

  89. New Home by habig · · Score: 1

    If your Wii is gathering dust, I've a so-far Wii-less home where my two sons would love to keep the dust off it for you.

    Can't say as I've seen any at garage sales, where shelf-dust-collecting devices tend to end up.

  90. This is the problem with purists. by Mahjub+Sa'aden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the problem with purists: endless classifications that serve no real purpose except to exclude. Classifications do this automatically -- of course -- and some are valid -- of course! -- but when it comes down to an absurd pissing contest about who can be the most pure on a particular subject, you have to ask if there isn't something wrong.

    I see this in music all the time. You get "purists" who believe that it's somehow helpful to have jazz fusion and Indo-jazz fusion and Indo-jazz Bollywood fusion and Indo-jazz Bollywood fusion fuzz-pop. The same with games. Is it a first person shooter? I don't know; is it in the first person, and do you spend a lot of time shooting? The answer to this question seems pretty straight-forward.

    Of course now some purist purist is going to come along and tell me why it's important that purists constantly and consciously engage in follicle division, and why there are seven kinds of purists, and this is their genus, et cetera. You know what? We're not 19th century scientists any more. Not everything needs a rigorous classification system.

    --
    What is is all that is. Isn't that obvious?
  91. The "S" stands for "Shooter" by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    So if you ain't shooting, it ain't an FPS by definition....

    --
    No sig today...
  92. Need more games like Wii Sports by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

    I bought my Wii because I thought Wii Sports was great; but since it came out, I haven't seen any more games like this. I'm just not interested in 80s style platform games like Mario, and if I wanted FPS games, I'd just stick with my PS2.

    The Wii Remote is fantastic with Wii Sports ... so why aren't they making more games like this?

    --
    -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
  93. Ridiculous... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    ... seriously, it's way too early to speculate, we can have this conversation again sometime in the next year and a half. We have yet to see how the "casual" market will work out with the Wii, and not to mention what kind of success 3rd parties publishers will have on the Wii.

  94. Mine is gathering dust. by Xest · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Wii games just don't really appeal to me but I just can't get into the Wii for the life of me. Frankly I think one of the main reasons is because after a long days work I just wanna sit back and play mindlessly, many 360 games allow me to do this whereas using the Wii remote actually requires you to put effort in. Other than that I think it's just that games on the 360 to me appeal more.

    One final reason that I'm a bit pissed about the Wii is that I bought a bunch of Virtual Console titles I was looking forward to playing, yet there's a bug that's existed since release effecting EU PAL consoles and the virtual console whereby many games don't work correctly with HD displays over Nintendo's component cable and I don't have any other inputs spare (I have a PC on digital in and the 360 on analog in). Some Nintendo apologists blame the displays but when other devices (including the Wii itself outside of it's VC) quite happily display in 480p okay it's pretty obvious where the fault is. It doesn't even seem like a hard fix as when you call up the Wii menu and interrupt the VC game it actually shows the game okay in the background, thus far Nintendo's only response to me has been "we're aware of the problem", unfortunately that's the same response they've given me for almost a year now.

    I don't hate Nintendo and I don't hate the Wii, I still play Wii sports now and again and I play various party games like Rayman's multiplayer mode, Warioware etc. when friends are over but for every hour I play on the Wii I seem to spend about 200 on the 360 or PC. The lack of worthwhile multiplayer is another major turn off.

    I'm hoping they bring a new pikmin game out or something, I loved them on the Gamecube and I think that might give me the Wii the attention it deserves, because when it comes to I still think the concept of the Wii is awesome. Until that game comes along that draws me in though the Wii just isn't for me - I'm sure I'm a minority but I doubt I'm alone either.

  95. I say this as a nerd, a gamer, and a slashdotter by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm also sitting around waiting for the new mario Galaxy game to be released. Dude, get a life! :)
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  96. What about the virtual games component by dregs · · Score: 1

    Nintendo seem to be selling virtual games at a great rate,here in australia there now more than 100 available, and I know I've bought 10 or so. I bet the profit per sale on a virtual game is close to that on a Wii game.

  97. mine is dormant by aoty · · Score: 1

    I can only speak for myself, but my Wii is gathering dust. I've had it since launch day, and once I finished Zelda and Elebits, it sat unused until Metroid. I blew through Metroid in a week and set the Wii aside again. My seriously consider skipping the next Mario (me? skip a Mario?) Yeah. The Wii is been a big disappointment for me. I picked up a 360 last month and I am blown away by the online functionality (you listening Nintendo?). Plus, there is a huge library of killer games with more coming this holiday. I can't believe I'm supporting a MS console.

  98. Thie console I play the most... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

    Is my DS. I remember similar fears at this time in its life.

  99. The Wii isnt a single person machine by asm2750 · · Score: 1

    Nintendo designed the Wii with the focus of having fun with family and/or friends. Really, just playing the Wii by yourself can be fun, but playing with friends is where the system truly shines. Unfortunately, people have real lives too, and don't really have time to play games every waking moment.

  100. that is pretty funny considering... by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

    I'm reading and replying to this from my wii. oh...I just dusted it last week too...

  101. Working at Gamestop by Lemental · · Score: 1

    6 Wii's have been traded in this week for a new 360. Make of it what you will.

  102. Wii Balance Board by ridabug · · Score: 0

    I believe that once the Wii "Balance Board" (name may change) comes out early next year, it will cause some more excitement for the Wii platform. To me, it is another console revolution like the Wii remote was/is. The balance board not only detects which way you are leaning, but it detects your center of gravity. The balance board will initially support the new Wii Fit program. The Wii Fit program has some exercise routines including yoga. The "Balance Board" will have a lot of potential for new games also. It would be cool to have a surfing or skateboarding game that supports the board.

  103. Article couldn't be more wrong at my house. by macwhiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a Nintendo 64 when it came out, and I played with it occasionally. I got one of the last "thick" PS2s, and a small handful of games for it. Every 6 to 9 months, I'd see some game that seemed interesting, and play it for a week or two. Between times the PS2 gathered dust.

    I finally got my hands on a Wii last February. Since then, it's been used at least three times a week, sometimes daily. I played through Twilight Princess, then downloaded Ocarina and played farther through it than I ever had on the N64. The girlfriend and daughter enjoy the Everybody Votes Channel, and once the Wii is on to "check for questions" it usually winds up being used for some game or other. Games where the people watching can "help" are popular at my house: Twilight Princess, Super Paper Mario, GameCube titles like Wind Waker and Paper Mario: Thousand Year Door. I play a lot of Virtual Console games from my childhood. Lately, I've not used the Wii quite as much... because I'm playing Phantom Hourglass on the DS. (The girlfriend has complained that Nintendo needs to provide some way of mirroring the DS screen to the TV via the Wii, so that she can watch me play.) We occasionally play Mario Party 8 or Wii Sports together as a family.

    In short, the Wii has seen several orders of magnitude more play time than any other console I've owned since the Atari 2600.

    It'll get a lot more use when Nintendo releases some form of Tetris for it. The girlfriend will shove me aside to get her mitts on the Wiimote when that happens.

    I'm not a kid anymore, but I still like me some toys. The Wii is just plain fun. Nintendo understands how to make fun games, and that they don't have to be hi-def eye candy if they're actually enjoyable. The "shovelware" vendors don't get this. That's why they're scared -- their business model is based on pretty, not fun, and that business model doesn't work for Wii owners.

    I'm a professional UNIX administrator. I use Macs at home because they just work. By the time I get home, I don't want to muck with the computer anymore, I just want to do things. The Wii, especially with Nintendo games, is just fun. I'm not a Nintendo fanboy -- I hated Nintendo when I was young and an Atari fanboy -- I just think that this product meets an untapped need really well.

    In my opinion, the people pooh-poohing the Wii because of its graphics seem a lot like the folks who derided the Mac's "toy-like" graphic interface, or the iPod's "limited" interface compared to the Rio... such people completely miss the point that they aren't the mass market, and sometimes simpler is better. "The Wii is dying" is the "BSD is dying" for 2007, I guess.

  104. Sports teams by Tony · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    God DAMN! It's like watching a bunch of no-necked jocks arguing about the best sports team around here.

    Nothing like a spot of, "The Wii is the best console out there!" followed by, "No way, N00b. teh 360 is the r0x!" ending with a, "I say, old chap, the PS3 is the superior system!"

    How old are all of you? 13? You can like your favorite system without slamming the other systems, you know. That is, unless you are worried about your penis size.

    Yes, this is a flame. I just can't believe all the whining that goes on around here every time a console is mentioned.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  105. Too much dependency on the motion controls alone by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an owner of a Wii myself, I've been finding it extremely difficult to tolerate playing most Wii games for more than a couple days. While motion controls may enhance gameplay in many instances, it should not be the only control scheme available. Many of us who are older or disabled are extremely sensitive to repetative movement in the arms, hands, neck and back. Unfortunately, there aren't many Wii titles that allow you to switch between button mashing and motion controls, so once you hit your limit of what you can tolerate in terms of pain, you only have the option of walking away from the game to recover. Combine this with the fact that many of us also work physically demanding jobs, and soon you have to choose between gaming or job security.

    Of course, a lot of the problem, is that Nintendo has yet to provide Wii users a true, wireless controller for more traditional games aside from that crappy classic controller you have to plug into the Wii remote. Sure, there's the wavebird, but a true, Wii-native controller would be better. (Perhaps Nintendo could take a page from Sony and create a Wavebird/Wii-remote hybrid that does both traditional controls and motion controls in a single unit.)

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  106. The village is a traning stage by Santana · · Score: 1

    The village is a traning stage. Fun begins when you get out from it.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it
  107. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  108. Outselling PS2 and SNES by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    If their numbers are correct, this chart shows that the Wii has outsold the PS2 and SNES, a couple of the most popular consoles ever, for this point in its launch. It also shows that the PS2 had a similar slump at a slightly earlier point, which is why the Wii has just caught up with it.

  109. Sales dip in Japan by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

    Looking at the weekly sales chart for consoles in Japan, it seems as though the Wii dropped about 50% of its weekly sales over a two week period in August, and 2/3 in about a month.

    This seems an improbable drop without a causal factor - is it possible that Nintendo simply reduced console output to Japan in an attempt to divert resources to the US holiday market? Production, presumably, is capped at this point, so that's probably their only viable way of increasing US supply.

  110. You're not the intended audience by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

    In fact, pretty much every person who buys a PS3 isn't the intended audience. The Wii is designed and marketed to the casual player, the PS3 to the hardcore player. The games are "shallow" because they need to be easy to play, so anyone can play.

  111. The projections of this generation are fascinating by hayden · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But I believe they are horribly wrong.

    History has shown that once a console gains market dominance it's all but over bar the fat lady singing for the competition. Sure they may be able to eke out a borderline existence but no console has ever had a heartwarming come from behind Disney style win once a clear leader was established.

    The NES bitch slapped all comers. The Playstation surprised everybody, destroyed Sega and did Japanese fetish like things to Nintendo. The PS2 laughed like a bad guy in an anime at the competition before crushing them all.

    Despite all this the current crop of "games journalists" seem to be adamant about how Sony will execute an amazing come from behind win. "It's has the hardware that gives me wet dreams." "It's a Playstation and therefore is sent from heaven to save us from actual gameplay." "It's bigger than the first generation XBox controller." "Zero Punctuation owns one so they must be the shit."

    I believe that Sony has fluffed this generation in a way that rivals the mistakes made by Osborne or Apple in the early 90s. They took a name that was the pretty much the definition of sex in the nerd world and turned it into the equivalent of COBOL for masses. Unless a Y2K event happens in the near future, Sony will be pan handling for change soon.

    As for the 360, MS has never made hardware this complex before and it shows. It is less reliable than a business person who honestly believes that ties make you more professional and successful. Consoles are supposed to be something that gets about as much attention as a VCR. You plug in in under 2 feet of cables and the charming photos that Aunt May sent you last Christmas and it just works. Not something that requires raised floors and dedicated air conditioning to survive the harsh environment of the average consumer's home.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  112. I've been feeling this vibe as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    however, it's the deadzone between the summer and the christmas season.

    during the summer, people arent in school, etc, so interest into gaming systems will be there, though the summer is also kinda dead as well.

    christmas is coming up, people are saving their money to buy gifts for the upcoming holiday season. so sales are down everywhere.

    when I worked at radioshack, the whole month of october was dead until the last 2 weeks, then we started picking up, early shoppers, etc. then black friday came along and it was active until january.

    Also, it should be noted, in the US retail sales in general are down, this is bound to hurt sales figures.

  113. Pure Speculation by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

    "...citing one software house president as saying, 'People bought it out of curiosity, and it's likely a lot of them haven't used it.' "

    It's crap like this that shouldn't even be making headlines here at Slashdot. If this president had some industry numbers showing that demand has gone down, maybe he'd have a point. Perhaps his software house didn't anticipate the popularity and is scrambling to deliver a title or two? Perhaps they invested too much time/people into other consoles? Whatever the case, it's still speculation.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
  114. Wii usage by Kuvter · · Score: 1

    I used my Wii for a while right after I got it. Since then it's had it's times of dust building, with the occasional use here and there. I have Wii Sports and Wii Play and I'm set for now. However once Smash Brothers Brawl comes out my Wii will need a new heatsink. That being said the best games normally come out a year or two after the launch. To me Wii Sports is a game that says, "Look what the Wii can do, now do it better." Just like Super Mario Bros. did for the NES.

    --
    "To be is to do." --Socrates
    "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
    "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
  115. PS3 respects PS2 region coding by tepples · · Score: 1

    Was there an official statement from Sony that they support region lockout at all? Sony owns Sony Pictures and Sony Electronics. Put a Region 1 DVD-Video disc published by Sony Pictures into another region DVD player made by Sony and see what doesn't fail.

    Was there an official statement from Sony Computer Entertainment that they support region lockout on games played in the PLAYSTATION 3 console at all? This disc cannot be started due to region restrictions.
  116. Wii pwns @ Sports. by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    Why would I get Madden for the Wii when I could play it in HD?

    Perhaps, because it's the best version available? Seriously, I have an HD projector, (a 96" screen, and all 3 systems) and so far the Wii owns all in Sports games. Yes the graphics aren't as good (Tiger Woods is especially PS2-tastic looking), but Madden and Tiger Woods simply play better on the Wii than any other system. I can't wait till Fight Night comes out for it.

  117. 3 words by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    Super Mario Strikers.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  118. Are you insane? by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    "Games for -all- consoles tend to be a bit lacking this year"

    No offense, but this year has easily been one of the most block buster gaming years in the entire history of gaming. On the 360 along we've seen more 9 and 10 rated games that all other consoles combined in a single year! Forza 2, Bioshock, Halo 3, Mass Effect, The Orange Box, Guitar Hero 3, PGR4, Puzzle Quest, Eternal Sonata, and a whole slew of others.

  119. Re: PSN games worth buying. by trdrstv · · Score: 1

    I have also downloaded like 10 games for the PSN basically at an average of 6 dollars a game I look at it as a game rental that I get to keep.

    There are 10 PSN games worth buying? No seriously... I have a PS3 and I have found the game selection lacking (both online and retail) and the reviews seem to be mediocre at best. SuperStarDust HD and what else?

    I don't use my PS3 as a ps3 nearly as often as I use in ps2/psx mode, but that internal memory card feature makes my life so much easier so I am proud to say I own a ps3 to play ps2 games lol. In the last few months I have picked up an insane amount of ps2 titles for cheap. I don't really enjoy paying 60 dollars a new title at this point in my life I am in the 20 dollar game market.

    Same here. Hell at this point if I could play a BluRay movie without the Cell, you could rip it out and I wouldn't notice.

    As far as PS2 games, check out the "Sub $10 used game market"... Metal Gear Solid 2, SlyCooper, Jak & Daxter... All good stuff. Oh, and Psychonaughts... it's like $12 and great.

  120. Wii Disagrii by Uberwabawaba · · Score: 1

    I have never enjoyed console gaming much until my brother bought this Wii for my house, I was really surprised at just how much I enjoy playing it. I guess one of the things I really like about it is how its designed for more than just gaming with the web browsing and all that built in and easy to use. And while I understand the concerns raised by one poster about how those controls would be difficult for someone with certain disabilities I just do not see how its relevant. If you have physical disabilities (as I have) there are certain limitations you have to face in life and there will be things or products that simply are not the best choice for you. Wii's entire marketing was based around the 'physicality' of the controllers, how could anyone have bought this without being aware of the physical requirements to fully enjoy it. In the end, pick the product that fits your needs.

  121. Prime no FPS like Zelda's no TPS by LKM · · Score: 1

    There are two ways too look at it. Yes, it's in First Person, and yes, you shoot. So it's a First Person Shooter. However, the games we generally put in the FPS genre are all quite different from Prime and Prime 2. Prime and Prime 2 are Zelda games with First Person Views, and we generally don't call Zelda games Third Person Shooters, even though Zelda is third person and you shoot.

    So Prime isn't an FPS the same way that Zelda isn't a TPS.

  122. Wha? by LKM · · Score: 1

    There are a bunch of great third-party Wii games announced, Monster Hunter 3 for example.

  123. Software Sales aren't Poor at all by LKM · · Score: 1

    The thing is that Wii software sales aren't poor. They're actually better than the PS3's, and on par with what the 360 had a year after launch. And that is even with the crappy third-party support the Wii has as of now.

  124. Re:Gamecube worth keeping in addition to the Wii.. by LKM · · Score: 1

    Wow, I didn't even realize it played GBC games. I just ordered one. I wish my micro would play the GB and GBC Zeldas :-(

  125. PSN Games by LKM · · Score: 1
    I got the following PSN games:
    • The Duck game. Sucks, but cheap, so I got it anyways
    • The Tetris game with eggs. Not so cool, either, but okay if you like the genre
    • flOw: Much hype, no actual game
    • Loco Roco Cocoreccho: What the hell did they do to one of my favourite games???
    • Calling all Cars: Fun for 15 minutes, I guess, if a few friends are around
    • Warhawk: Now we're talking. Awesome game
    • The Ski game: WTF??? Well, it's cheap, so I guess it was worth the 3 or so bucks just for the laughs
    • Pixeljunk Racers: Fun, but too shallow
    • Everyday Shooter: Doesn't live up to the hype, in my opinion

    Of course, there are also a bunch of downloadable PS1 games:
    • Cool Boarders: Why in the world did I ever think this game was good? Piece of shit.
    • Wipeout: Wow, and we used to think this could compete with F-Zero 64. The tearing makes this unplayable for me.
    • Castlevania: SotN. Clearly one of the best games ever; only issue: the recent release of Super Metroid on the Wii VC tops this in the Metroidvania genre

    While the Wii's game selection is nothing to brag about, it beats the PSN both online and offline, even without any original online games. Of the originall PSN games, only Warhawk is a must-have. Some are decent, but most are pretty crappy.
  126. Not bought one yet by scrantaj · · Score: 1

    But thinking about gettng on for Christmass. The thing that puts me off is that in order to play these "casual, group orientated games" I have to go and buy at least one, and probably more, extra controllers for it. Additional controllers are a significant fraction of the basic purchase price. If I want to play multiplayer Wii sports etc with the kids on Christmass day, I can't do it "out of the box". Hardcore consoles are aimed at hardcore players, usually playing solo or online for multiplayer. The big selling point of the Wii is to play games together in the same room. Not putting at least one extra controller in the pack kills that immediately.

  127. Amen to the VC bug! by LKM · · Score: 1

    One final reason that I'm a bit pissed about the Wii is that I bought a bunch of Virtual Console titles I was looking forward to playing, yet there's a bug that's existed since release effecting EU PAL consoles and the virtual console whereby many games don't work correctly with HD displays over Nintendo's component cable

    Oh man, that is pissing me off so much. Other from not being able to launch game from the SD card, this is my single issue with the Wii. I bought Super Metroid last week. Why the hell do I have to plug the Wii into the video port of my beamer in order to play it? It looks like crap that way! Nintendo, fix this. I don't need USB keyboards and all that other crap, I just want to launch VC games from the SD card, and play all VC games using component cables on my HD beamer. Thanks a bunch!

    And yeah, a new Pikmin on the Wii would be awesome.

  128. People should be worried about PS3, not Wii by LKM · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd be more worried about the studios who hitched their train to PS3. Given North American numbers, I don't think a single PS3 software title has sold even a quarter-million units.

    Wow, you're right. VGChartz says that only two PS3 games have sold >1 million world-wide: Motorstorm (1.28) and Resistance (1.72). The Wii, OTOH, has 8 >1 million sellers, including two third-party games. Zelda is the largest seller after Wii Sports and Wii Play, and it sold 3.78 million copies.

  129. Cube == Best Last-Gen Console by LKM · · Score: 1
    You're obviously flamebaiting (either that, or insane), but still...

    Because it had about 4 good games the entire lifetime of the system?

    Metroid Prime, Resident Evil 4 (two of the highest rated games ever), Twilight Princess, Wind Waker, Soul Calibur II, Viewtiful Joe, Prime 2, Super Mario Sunshine, Eternal Darkness, Super Smash Bros Melee, Rogue Leader, TimeSplitters 2, F-Zero GX, Pikmin, Super Monkey Ball, Beyond Good & Evil, Paper Mario, ...

    Because it came out at the same time as the Xbox, but was barely more powerful than the (relatively ancient) PS2?

    See, this is where you move from "okay, he has different tastes from mine" to "bat-shit insane." The PS2 has nothing that can compete with stuff like Resident Evil 4. I mean, PS2 is plainly situated in jaggie-land. There's really no comparison between the PS2 and the Cube.

    Because it was the only console on the market that had no online play and couldn't play DVDs?

    Well, it obviously couldn't play DVDs, but it did online just fine. Unfortunately, hardly any games made use of it.

    Because the wacky disk they used instead of DVDs could only hold 1.5 GB, so cross-platform ports had to be trimmed down for Gamecube?

    Okay, which games are you talking about?

    Because it's weird top-loading disk system meant it didn't fit in a lot of people's entertainment centers?

    Yeah, unlike the PS2, or the Xbox, or the 360, or the PS3, or any other damn console in the history of consoles. I do not own a single console which fits into my entertainment center (by which I assume you mean it I can stack it). Actually, the Cube has the advantage of being small, so it's easy to place it, but the Xbox? Or the original PS2? Not so damn much.

    1. Re:Cube == Best Last-Gen Console by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Skipping the first point, because I guess it's more an opinion than anything.

      See, this is where you move from "okay, he has different tastes from mine" to "bat-shit insane." The PS2 has nothing that can compete with stuff like Resident Evil 4. I mean, PS2 is plainly situated in jaggie-land. There's really no comparison between the PS2 and the Cube.

      Yes, the hardware of the Cube (except the optical drive) was more or less twice as powerful as the PS2. The problem is that it came out at the same time as the Xbox, and it was a complete wimp when compared to that system. It had a year's development time on the PS2, so you'd expect the hardware there to be better, but it was nowhere near the (more relevant) competition.

      but it did online just fine. Unfortunately, hardly any games made use of it.

      The Gamecube didn't even have a network card, how were you supposed to put it online? Magic beans?

      Sure, maybe some super-obscure Japanese-only import that cost a geeky Nintendo nerd somewhere $600 just happened to work with one game in the US because Nintendo never bothered to screen by nationality, but that's hardly the same as "it did online just fine."

      Because the wacky disk they used instead of DVDs could only hold 1.5 GB, so cross-platform ports had to be trimmed down for Gamecube?

      Okay, which games are you talking about?


      I've seen it in developer interviews/post mortems before, but now I can't find any references, so I guess I withdraw that point unless someone else wants to dig up a list. (For the record, it wasn't "trimmed down" meaning less content, but things like reducing the texture size or the video quality.)

      Yeah, unlike the PS2, or the Xbox, or the 360, or the PS3, or any other damn console in the history of consoles. I do not own a single console which fits into my entertainment center (by which I assume you mean it I can stack it). Actually, the Cube has the advantage of being small, so it's easy to place it, but the Xbox? Or the original PS2? Not so damn much.

      You have a very strange entertainment center. My Xbox was the exact same size as my Dish Network decoder box, and not as tall as my surround receiver. It fit perfectly on a shelf. If a Xbox 360 doesn't fit in your entertainment center, how do you get your cable box in it? Or surround receiver? Seriously, the Xbox 360 is half the size of either of those.

      The Gamecube didn't fit because it was too tall, not because it was too big in general. Making what is essentially a A/V component cube-shaped was a dumb idea.

    2. Re:Cube == Best Last-Gen Console by LKM · · Score: 1

      Yes, the hardware of the Cube (except the optical drive) was more or less twice as powerful as the PS2. The problem is that it came out at the same time as the Xbox, and it was a complete wimp when compared to that system.

      It also cost quite a bit less and was about a fourth the size. Not to mention that, looking at the actual games, the Cube's prettiest games (Metroid Prime 2, Resident Evil 4) were easily able to compete with the Xbox's prettiest games.

      The Gamecube didn't even have a network card, how were you supposed to put it online? Magic beans?

      I suggest that the next time you try to be ironic, you check your facts first :-)

      The Cube had both a broadband adapter (basically an Ethernet port) and a modem adapter. There were few online games, but actually a bunch of games which used he broadaband adapter for LAN games, among them Mario Kart (which allowed for 8-player games using two Cubes) and F-Zero GX. Additionally, there exists PC tunneling software which uses the LAN features of these games for real online gaming.

      I'm assuming you don't actually own a Cube? I would guess you'd know that, had you owned one.

      Sure, maybe some super-obscure Japanese-only import that cost a geeky Nintendo nerd somewhere $600 just happened to work with one game in the US because Nintendo never bothered to screen by nationality, but that's hardly the same as "it did online just fine."

      Again, you're wrong. For example, Fantasy Star Online was a real, actual Gamecube game that was sold world-wide.

      Because the wacky disk they used instead of DVDs could only hold 1.5 GB, so cross-platform ports had to be trimmed down for Gamecube? Okay, which games are you talking about? I've seen it in developer interviews/post mortems before, but now I can't find any references, so I guess I withdraw that point unless someone else wants to dig up a list. (For the record, it wasn't "trimmed down" meaning less content, but things like reducing the texture size or the video quality.)

      A bunch of games came on more than one disc (some Resident Evil remakes, I think), but I've never heard that devs had to reduce texture quality for Cube ports.

      Yeah, unlike the PS2, or the Xbox, or the 360, or the PS3, or any other damn console in the history of consoles. I do not own a single console which fits into my entertainment center (by which I assume you mean it I can stack it). Actually, the Cube has the advantage of being small, so it's easy to place it, but the Xbox? Or the original PS2? Not so damn much. You have a very strange entertainment center. My Xbox was the exact same size as my Dish Network decoder box, and not as tall as my surround receiver. It fit perfectly on a shelf. If a Xbox 360 doesn't fit in your entertainment center, how do you get your cable box in it? Or surround receiver? Seriously, the Xbox 360 is half the size of either of those.

      I don't have a cable box, and all the other parts (VHS recorder, DVD player, stereo) are stackable. None of the consoles are stackable. Currently, I have the PS3 on top of everything and the Wii next to it. There's simply no room for the Xbox (which, again, I can't stack on top of the PS3, and I can't stack the PS3 on top of the Xbox) or the PS2. None of the consoles are stackable, but at least the Cube and the Wii aren't as freaking big as the Xbox, PS3, or the original PS2.

    3. Re:Cube == Best Last-Gen Console by morari · · Score: 1

      Yes, the hardware of the Cube (except the optical drive) was more or less twice as powerful as the PS2. The problem is that it came out at the same time as the Xbox, and it was a complete wimp when compared to that system. It had a year's development time on the PS2, so you'd expect the hardware there to be better, but it was nowhere near the (more relevant) competition. The Dreamcast came out before the Playstation and was superior in every conceivable way, save for marketing lies and commercial conditioning.
      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune