Slashdot Mirror


Monster Cables Pushes Around the Wrong Small Company

Alien54 writes "Audioholics has a fun read regarding a recent legal dustup involving Monster Cables. The well-known (some might say notorious) cabling company sent a cease and desist letter to Blue Jeans Cable over a supposed patent violation. What the Monster folks couldn't have known was that Blue Jeans president Kurt Denke used to be a lawyer. His response is as humorous as it is thorough. ' Let me begin by stating, without equivocation, that I have no interest whatsoever in infringing upon any intellectual property belonging to Monster Cable. Indeed, the less my customers think my products resemble Monster's, in form or in function, the better ... If there is more than one such connector design in actual use by Monster Cable as to which appropriation of trade dress is alleged, of course, I will require this information for each and every such design. On the basis of what I have seen, both in the USPTO documents you have sent and the actual appearance of Monster Cable connectors which I have observed in use in commerce, it does not appear to me that Monster Cable is in a position to advance a nonfrivolous claim for infringement of these marks.'"

572 comments

  1. The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read every word of that rather long article, and all I have to say is "OWNED". Wow. Normally I refer from such Internet slang, but I really believe in my heart that it applies here.

    1. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're lying. You probably read fark, ebaums, etc.

    2. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I recognize that AC account. He's ALWAYS on 4chan in the /b/oards. You know, I herd he likes mudkips.

    3. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Were Monster cable "owned"?

      They're just going to harass someone else now. They don't really care that much. The basic business plan here is "threaten to sue", "threaten some more", "If target refuses to settle then give up, else settle". They know full well that some people are going to call their bluff. He just happened to do it in a very long winded, wordy way that has saved them a lot of time and effort.

    4. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by masdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The long-winded and wordy way, combined with being released on the Internet, will go a long way towards keeping Monster from doing this again. The next company they threaten to sue will likely turn up this letter in a simple Google search, providing that company's legal counsel with a bucket full of ammo.

      I would say Monster's days of running around suing competitors will be drawing to a close soon.

    5. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My favorite quote:

      Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it.

      Good to see a little guy who seriously intends to go not only to trial but to final judgement against a big patent bully. They definitely picked the wrong person to pick on.

    6. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by JordanL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My favorite part is where he obliquely mentions that if they do take him to court and try to bleed him dry he'll kindly foward along their sham company tax shelter methods to the IRS that they use to avoid paying income tax on their Intellectual Property. That's gotta scare the hell out of most companies.

    7. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ComSon0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is the most beautiful letter I ever read. It teared my eyes. I am a dude, but I think I love that guy.

    8. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you refrain more than you refer, but I refrigerate.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    9. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I also love when he threatens Rule 11 sanctions, demands extensive discovery, and threatens to challenge each and every one of their patents. Oh, and he accuses them of acting in bad faith, without candor.

      But really, you're right -- threatening their tax shelter was a masterstroke.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    10. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The whole letter is a lawyers way to tell them to go *** themselves.

      But it's really good to read!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      top, bottom, or switch hitter?

    12. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I hope this goes to litigation. Slashdot needs a new SCO.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    13. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was thinking about Dave Chappelle's impression of the late Rick James

      "What did the 5 fingers say to the face?"

      *SLAP*

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    14. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Coooold Bloooded"

    15. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    16. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I loved it. I've already framed it! Blue Jeans Cable is who I am going to do business with from now on!

    17. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by notgm · · Score: 1

      agreed. i wish that he had left out the last four paragraphs, monster may have considered pursuing this if he had.

      may not have been as amusing to us, but eventually it would have been.

    18. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really funny is when those tax shelter methods make the company lose standing to sue on the patents.

    19. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by PS3Penguin · · Score: 1

      Agreed! I loved that line as well. I've been spreading that all over work today! (Who say's the news is always depressing!) This makes me think .. we should start an internet award that can be given each year to the best "little guy" that stands up to the giant (even if they didn't win). I nominate Kurt Denke!

    20. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Workaphobia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed. I especially liked the transition from the beginning of the letter, where he responded with feigned interest and dozens of requests for more information, to the middle where he gave a detailed technical justification for his design, to the end where he became downright threatening to Monster, and rightly so. Here is a man who knows how to scare off a litigation troll.

      Also, notice how he replied on the last day of the two week period Monster's lawyers gave him. This, combined with the number of requests for clarification he made, demonstrates that he will ensure any actual court proceedings drag on for as long as possible.

      He sure as hell didn't blink.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    21. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      But really, you're right -- threatening their tax shelter was a masterstroke. Both you and the GP talk about tax shelters like they're illegal.

      Setting up a company to lease IP rights back to you is not against the law AFAIK.
      The fact that the company is offshore is not terribly relevant, except that they have forable use of foreign tax laws.

      Tax laws are riddled with loopholes and investment firms make lots of money figuring out how to work within the rules.
      When they go to far, the SEC & IRS come down on them hard.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    22. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by mr_death · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no "sham company tax shelter methods" -- just the usual legal method of tranferring income from a high tax juristiction to a lower one. Companies and people do this all the time (e.g., US/Bermuda, California/Nevada) to avoid their biggest and unnecessary expense.

      The threat here is not "you're going to jail", but "we're going to expose you to political ridicule for not passively bending over and paying whatever the government demand."

      If you don't consider this method as a part of your tax planning, you're paying more than you need to. As Judge Learned Hand said, "Anyone may arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible, everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right; for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands. Taxes are an enforceable action, not a voluntary contribution."
      Helvering vs Gregory
      60 Fed (2d) 809

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    23. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Both you and the GP talk about tax shelters like they're illegal.
      [...]
      Tax laws are riddled with loopholes and investment firms make lots of money figuring out how to work within the rules. Oh, sure. The key is that these rules are so complicated that attempts to jump through the loop holes frequently result in mistakes. The question Monster needs to ask themselves is if they feel lucky.

      Basically, by questioning the "arm's length" relationship between the two entities in their licensing agreements, he's saying that they'd better make sure their financial house is in order before bringing him to court.

      Then again, I run away screaming at the prospect of having to learn corporate tax law, so I may be too trusting of his oblique threat.
      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    24. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dubbreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..go *** themselves..
      Go ass themselves?
      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    25. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Normally I refer from such Internet slang"

      In that case I think the word you're looking for is pwn3d.

    26. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by AnomaliesAndrew · · Score: 1

      (Caution: Opinions follow...)

      There's only one reason to buy cables better than the cheapies at RadioShack:

      Durability.

      And in my experience, even the RadioShack jobbers will often outlive the "premium" cables the brand names peddle.

      The only people buying Monster products are people who don't understand, or who think they're getting a deal at a box store because they can get the cables for half price with new electronics... ("wow, only $40 for 3' of coax?! well, it was $80... sure I'll take 4.")

      When a product like this is sold, sales people usually later discuss it amongst themselves making spanking gestures.

      --
      Move all sig!
    27. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by asc99c · · Score: 1

      Agreed that the tax shelter isn't illegal and a company of their size is likely to have made sure they are only avoiding tax legitimately.

      Perhaps though, US courts won't look as favourably on a company that avoids paying US taxes. In theory it shouldn't matter, but in practice I'm sure it could affect the court's view.

    28. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

      I about shit my pants I laughed so hard at this.

    29. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1

      No no, I believe the proper phrase is 'but I digest'.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    30. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by JordanL · · Score: 1

      The point I was making was two fold:

      In one sweeping stroke he forces them to choose between their IP or their tax liability. His supposition of "arms length" puts them in an awkward position. If they do still have standing to sue using the IP, then the tax evasion methods are almost certainly illegal. If the tax evasion methods are legal, then they don't have standing to sue.

    31. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by PingXao · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's completely legal. Unethical and unpatriotic, yes, but not illegal. In fact, since Bush took office those kinds of arrangements have actually been sanctioned and encouraged by the government.

    32. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      Although I 'LOATHE' Monster Cable and everything they stand for, I am sure that there off shore arrangements will pass IRS and US tax code muster. Unfortunately. Monster is really slime company.

    33. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by martin_henry · · Score: 1

      "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it." I about shit my pants I laughed so hard at this. Ditto!
      --
      www.purevolume.com/martyd
    34. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by willfe · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, no, they can still litigate to harass and irritate -- remember, it costs each party to participate (the Plaintiff has to pay the filing costs and such, but both sides have to pay their own lawyers).

      It won't get far if they take on a medium-to-large business, but they can still hassle small shops enough to be a problem. No, this didn't reach the litigation here and likely won't, but it's not cheap to defend against a civil suit. Think "a few thousand dollars" just to have a lawyer say "sure, I'll take the case" and a good $20-$30k more if it actually goes to trial.

      --
      Read my stuff.
    35. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by rockout · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I'm rarely moved by stuff like this to actually take action to support the company doing the fighting, but I have bookmarked Blue Jeans Cable and will be shopping there (as long as their prices aren't WAY higher than their competitors) in the future when I need cables or adapters.

      Might be a silly gesture but one that I'm doing anyway.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    36. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      My favorite quote from the easy to copy yet not worth the bother (asshats) is at the very beginning: "Re: Your letter, recieved April Fool's day
      Dear Monster Lawyers"

      Priceless!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    37. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by mr_death · · Score: 1

      I don't see the strict dichotomy (Monster gets their IP, or their tax-advantaged structure, but not both). The letter mentions the possibility, but not the certainty, of sham companies and sham transactions. From my experience, if these structures are drafted correctly, they are legitimate and at arms-length.

      That said, I really love his letter -- a most excellent comeback to a misdirected shotgun patent strategy.

      Monster is famous for questionable engineering claims concerning their cables. Their real strategy for success, IMHO, is their elaborate and extensive spiff program for people who sell their stuff.

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    38. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Hatta · · Score: 1

      He should have threatened Rule 34 sanctions.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    39. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

      I hate to be that guy, but the fellow who wrote that letter doesn't understand how to use a semi-colon.

      "Use a semicolon between the clauses of a compound sentence when the conjunction is omitted or when the connection is not close." (Taintor and Monro, 1988, The Secretary's Handbook) The writer has used a sentence of the "not only, but rather" from and used a semicolon in place of the missing conjunction "but".

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    40. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by vwjeff · · Score: 5, Informative

      "I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income;..."

      Wonderful. Monster Cable hates America!!!!

    41. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is 'owned' in every sense of the word. I laughed my ass off reading that whole article. Good for him for standing up to Monster. That guy is my hero for the day :)

      It gets especially humorous when he talks of Monster's typical business practices.

      -J

    42. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Informative

      When considering Tax issues, just keep in mind this little nugget of trivia...

      Tax law is the only area of the law where a lawyer is expected to obtain
      a speciality post doctorate degree (that is another advanced degree above
      and beyond the usual JD) just so that you can be considered qualified to
      START practicing in it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    43. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by general+scruff · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Already on their website . Click on the HDMI link on the left side. Its really interesting.
      This guy is no fool!

      --
      As a rule, I never trust dark brown ketchup.
    44. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be wrong, but I believe the point is:

      If Monster (the US company) is merely licensing the patents from Monster (the NON-US company), what right does Monster (the US company) have to sue for infringement?

    45. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I think he could have thrown in the terms "extortion" and "class-action lawsuit".

    46. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by lorenzino · · Score: 1

      MAN! The best piece is this : "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

    47. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It was that statement and the one that read:

      If you somehow managed, despite the formidable obstacles in your way, to obtain a finding of infringement, and if you were successful at recovering a large licensing fee--say, ten cents per connector--as the measure of damages, your recovery to date would not reach four figures.
      ...that sold me on becoming on of their customers.
    48. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by clamatius · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I got to the end of that article, I half expected to see it signed "Summer Glau".

    49. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      I liked this part:

      I do not compromise with bullies and I would rather spend fifty thousand dollars on defense than give you a dollar of unmerited settlement funds.


      But I read the whole thing which is unusual for me as I like to skim read. I'd say it's also rare to find a Slashdot article where so many people actually read the linked story instead of just reading and replying to comments. I would like to publically thank Kurt Denke for giving me such a good laugh.
      -H.
      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    50. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      That would be Rule 37.
      (*whistles innocently*)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    51. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      ""I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income;..." "

      Wow...what a great idea!! I'm guessing this is all legal, and I have no problem doing what it takes to keep as much of my money as possible legally.

      I have a "S" corp now....I wonder if I can do something like this as a single person business?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    52. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Not a silly gesture - I even bookmarked them myself. I'm not really in a position to purchase large quantities of cables, but who knows? Maybe, I will be at some future point.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    53. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! Funniest post on here. Smitty must've graduated from law school as well.

    54. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Just bought the new video cables I've been looking for.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    55. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by igny · · Score: 1

      Patently owned.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    56. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by stbill79 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I agree with the sentiment. Unfortunately, as an Engineer myself, I can recognize a purposefully obfuscated API when I see one. Not to bring in a little Microsoft bashing in a completely unrelated topic, but this is exactly why the ODF vs OOXML debate is so clearly seen for what it is - rigged to benefit some at the expense of others.

      Whether it's a multi-thousand page open specification for what should be a simple doc format, or an even larger and more confusing tax code that only specialized lawyers can understand is not the point. Instead, it is just one more case of the already wealthy, advantaged, and powere advantaging off an uneven playing field. Not uncommon at all in the modern US.

    57. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      The writer has not omitted the "not only" portion of the (compound) conjunction (which makes the first clause subordinate to the second). Either put in the "but rather" and change the semicolon to a comma, or omit the "not only:"

      "I am unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

      As written, it's not correct English.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    58. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not necessarily. I license some of my patents, and the standard license includes full rights for the licensee to begin litigation over violations of the license. In other words, as part of their license they receive rights to also prosecute my patent for me. And yes, this is legal - the licensee has a financial interest in maintaining my patents and protecting the market.

      I'm sure Monster would do the same thing - they license the tech from their Burmuda entity, and also have full rights to pursue patent infringement on behalf of their licensor.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    59. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by JordanL · · Score: 1

      How is that not a transfer of an asset? The only thing that they are not getting is the ability to revoke the license, which is moot of the licensee and licenser are owned by the same person/group.

    60. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I loved that he used the term "treble damage" in their final sentence.

    61. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ozbird · · Score: 1

      ..go *** themselves..
      Go ass themselves?
      Go sue themselves.
    62. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I only see one questionable use of the semi-colon in the quoted text: the first occurrence. The first use is (arguably) better-suited to be replaced by a colon, but the use of the semi-colon will suffice. Every other use of of the semi-colon is unarguably legitimate. Its use is to reduce ambiguity that would arise, had the writer rather used commas, due to the presence of commas within the components of the series he is enumerating.

      Fucker.

    63. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I retain the patent; I transfer certain rights relating to that patent to the licensee. It's not a transfer of an asset at all. Rather, it is a specific legal right extended to them as the licensee of the patent. But it's still my patent.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    64. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Joe public simply donesn't need durability.. they're not exacrtly going on tour with them (and even if they were there's nothing that gaffer tape won't fix..)

      It needs to be durable enough to go into the holes at the back of the cable box and the TV, and sit there undisturbed for the next 5 years.. ie. not at all. The only stress those cables are going to have to endure is an increasing layer of dust.

    65. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't illegal per se. However there are at least two issues that need to be considered.

      One is "transfer pricing". Is Monster IP Bermuda Ltd charging Monster Cables Inc too much for the patent licenses? If so, they will be in trouble with the IRS. That what he talks about when he refers to "bona fide arms-length transactions". It has to be the same as what, for example, Belkin would be willing to pay to license the patents.

      Secondly, the Bermuda company may be resident in the US for tax purposes. I'm not familiar with the US rules on residence, but in the UK, an offshore company is resident in the UK for tax purposes if it is controlled by persons who are resident in the UK.

    66. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      I agree both with the choice of a colon for the first semicolon and with the rest of the comment. He's using semicolons to set of groups of commas. e.g. I'm thinking of three groups of colors: red, white, and blue; red, gold, and black; and red, white, and green. Everybody but Faulkner and Hawwthorne would call it a run-on sentence though.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    67. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
      The whole letter is a lawyers way to tell them to go *** themselves.

      Actually, there's a much shorter lawyers' way to tell somebody to do that.

      "We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram."

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    68. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Informative
      You missed his point - indeed, it took me a while to realize. There is nothing wrong with it, it is legal if it meets the definition of a bona fide arms-length setup.

      But, but it wasn't Monster Cable International, Ltd, that issued him with the letter and claim. It was Monster in the US, so keen to litigate that they did something they had no onus to do ("on behalf of") - they completely forgot that their corporate shell game had given the patents to a company in Bermuda, and that they had no right to claim patent infringement when they weren't the patent owners.

      More clear now?

      "That, that's not ours! We don't have to pay tax on it! Oh, wait, you're using this thing of ... uh ... not ours ... and we ... uh ... they ... can't have that!"

    69. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      I also read the entire letter, and I have to say that if Monster wants to pursue this matter, they may well become the SCO of the crappy overpriced cables industry.
      I am going to grab some popcorn and keep an eye on this.

    70. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, you see, if they abandon their effort, Tartan can still pursue them for improper business practices, vexatious litigation and antitrust violations. It's beautiful. If they pursue it, they risk damaging future cases, and if they drop it, it becomes apparent that they merely intended to put out meritless claims, hoping that others would settle. Doing that would be a clearly improper practice, and they can be placed under injunctions to prevent them from doing it to others. It's LOSE/LOSE for Monster.

    71. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      You know, I herd he likes mudkips. Hello? Have you ever heard of someone who doesn't like mudkips?
    72. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dwater · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the legal equivalent of Clint Eastwood's "Make my day, punk".

      --
      Max.
    73. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dwater · · Score: 1

      "I assume..."

      Wonderful. Monster Cable hates America!!!! You mean, "You assume Monster Cable hates America!!!!"?
      --
      Max.
    74. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Looks much more expensive than monoprice.com.
      (I've not bought from either, but have kept monoprice in mind in case I need HDMI cables in the future.)

    75. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by netsharc · · Score: 1

      If he wants to really piss Monster Cable off, he could offer his lawyer services to other companies being sued by them, assuming he still has his lawyer's licence...

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    76. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fucking hate Mudkips.

    77. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dwater · · Score: 1

      -- a most excellent comeback to a misdirected shotgun patent strategy. More like a blunderbuster strategy, IMO :)
      --
      Max.
    78. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 3, Funny

      AH HA Caught you Tom Cruise!

    79. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Enlightenment · · Score: 1
      Clearly your vocabulary is limited. Those of us 'in the know' can see that there is a three-letter word which fits perfectly.

      Now, to find it...

    80. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Falstius · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wonder if he checked the veracity of the letter before responding. It would have been an awfully funny April Fool's joke by one of his employees.

    81. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ouch, mods.

      But, the long string of semicolons is separating a list of lists. He describes in comma-delimited clauses each aspect of the cable, and separates the clauses themselves with semicolons.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    82. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      No, I think he meant rule 34.

      But, rule 34 of Monster Cable lawyers and bigwigs... no thanks on that.

    83. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful: his parents were heterosexual.

    84. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TommydCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've bought a bunch of cables from them when I was remodelling my basement for in-wall use (actually turning into an everlasting project... but...).

      This was directly after I had to return some 30' HDMI cables I got from monoprice for not working at 1080p from my xbox360. This put me in a crunch to get new ones since the drywall was about to go in.

      I found Blue Jeans Cable referenced on AVS Forum (you will can weeks digging through A/V topics there) and saw their location was just up the street from where I work. They said I could pick it up in person and waived the shipping charges within a day!

      The cables are of excellent quality regardless of the price - which happens to be very affordable. I was most concerned about the HDMI cables at that length, but their website said it should work - and they did with flying colors, so to speak. I got their top of the line for the 1080p and the cheaper Tartan for DirecTV stuff (top res is 1080i), but it turns out I had no issue with their Tartan cable at 1080p either.

      I was impressed with their operation.

      Sorry for sounding like a marketing cheerleader, but I'm pulling for them, especially after the entertaining read. These are good guys, selling great product at excellent prices. They have earned my future business and do not deserve to be on the litigation receiving end of unethical competitors.

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
    85. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Question to anyone familiar with legal practicality: How hard would it be for us bored Slashdotters to watch Monster Cable's litigation team and just forward the letter to anyone they threaten? Surely Legal actions are a matter of public record? Or do the settlements typically occur out of the public space?

      Furthermore, in light of the defences here, can't prior targets of Monster Cable who have settled claim that they settled under duress? After all, threatening with litigation is threatening.

      --
      I hate printers.
    86. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *sigh*

      It is perfectly good English.

      Semicolons do roughly the same thing as periods; they're just not a full stop. They're wonderful things because they allow you to imply logical connections between ideas without getting bogged down in really pedantic conjunctions. Just take two clauses and put a semicolon in-between; you've just implied a relationship between them!

      Embrace the semicolon! Don't overdo it of course, but that goes for most things in life!

    87. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Or the always so current and informative TPB legal: http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php ;D

    88. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why else would they be on Monster Island? Even the moths are huge there!

    89. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Homer's+Donuts · · Score: 1

      I drive twenty five miles to work. I'm three minutes late.
      No, wait,you are right! If keep driving 75 all those guys who are passing me are going to make me miss the light.

    90. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by caliburngreywolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was installing sat systems, back in the dawn of HD content, four times I was handed a shiny box of Monster brand component cables by a grinning customer. "use these" they all said. Three times, those cables failed to work. Three times out of four I used the cheap no-name included cables (which always worked, by the way... 0 failures out of perhaps 100.)and handed the customer their open box of monster cables and said "get a refund" From that experience alone I would not use a Monster product unless it was handed to me free.

    91. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by indi0144 · · Score: 1
      You mean this:

      I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income;(...) Owned.
    92. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Duradin · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of a different Rule 37. Too bad there's no bounty on lawyer drones, yet.

    93. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You almost shit his pants too? What have you two been *doing*??

    94. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by unitron · · Score: 1

      This put me in a crunch to get new ones since the drywall was about to go in.

      And now you know why God invented conduit.

      And pull boxes.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    95. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anomolous+Cowturd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then take him to English court; if you dare, Bitch.

      --
      Software patents delenda est.
    96. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by ashudesai · · Score: 1

      Lmao! OwneD! 'aarRR!

    97. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Isn't rule 34 "If it exists, there is porn of it."?

    98. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hm. And the burden of getting my taxes straight lies solely on me... some average joe.

      Makes perfect sense, no?

    99. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, sir, is why your medical insurance premiums are so high

    100. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's actually a peninsula.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    101. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by iainl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The letter's point is that offshore tax shelters are indeed legal. If the offshore company is correctly run as a seperate entity perfoming proper arms-length transactions with the parent.

      However. He then shows that they've cocked up once, by forgetting to send the patent infringement claim from the Bermuda company that actually owns those patents. Do they really feel the rest of their ducks are correctly aligned, should the IRS come knocking?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    102. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by dintech · · Score: 1

      poo?

    103. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 1

      Embrace the semicolon! Don't overdo it of course, but that goes for most things in life!

    104. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Embrace the semicolon! Don't overdo it of course, but that goes for most things in life!
      You meant "Don't overdo it of course; that goes for most things in life", I presume?
    105. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      Replace the semicolon with a period in the original phrase and see how it parses.

      The problem is that "Not only" makes the first phrase dependent on the second. They can't be syntactically separated, by either a period or a semicolon.

    106. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's do a Microsoft and extend it after embracing it. I propose the interrosemicolon. It's to the semicolon what the interrobang is for the exclamation mark. The interrosemicolon is used to conjoin a question with a noninquisitive statement.

      Actually, I should patent that: "Method and apparatus to syntactically denote a logical connection between two statements, the first of which shall be inquisitive and the second of which shall be noninquisitive - on the internet." (Last part added so the USPTO rubber-stamps the application.)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    107. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well YOU'RE not rich enough to hire congressmen and have complicated loopholes written into tax code on your behalf, so your taxes should be simpler than a multi-million dollar corporation.

    108. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Has this arrangement ever been tested in court? My assumption was that a party would have to have legal standing to actually pursue litigation, which your licensee wouldn't have. In other words, you can't make the court recognize them as a valid litigant. But then I'm not a lawyer, so there you go.

    109. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      ""I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income;..." "

      Wow...what a great idea!! I'm guessing this is all legal, and I have no problem doing what it takes to keep as much of my money as possible legally.

      IANAL, but it's a well-known type of practice.

      In my industry, one notorious example was the insistence of a company's head office (in California somewhere IIRC) on specifying the exact equipment in each of the mobile laboratories built by their subsidiaries around the world. Which doesn't sound too unreasonable to someone with an accountancy background instead of a science background. So orders for lab equipment from the States go through without customs interference, and since the final product is going to be leaving the country, the equipment comes in untaxed ("FCG" - Free Circulation Goods - as we had to put on the customs forms when we ordered from our Head Office in Texas). The "lab equipment" included things like an electric kettle billed at $50 which we could have sourced locally for $15.

      The name of the game is "repatriation of profit before tax". At least in our business. Boy, was I happy to stop working for American mega-corporations.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    110. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by jwo7777777 · · Score: 1

      ... the bigger, the better ...

      or ... *ahem* ... so I've heard.

    111. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Woundweavr · · Score: 1

      Settlements are rarely public, and a part of the settlement often prohibits talking about the settlement.

      As to tracking legal action, there's no real way to do so. If there was, for instance, we could track those the RIAA/MPAA are threatening and those tactics would be much less effective.

    112. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Your home business expenses are also legal. How would you like en experienced lawyer to sift through your house and forward any items that need further proof for an IRS audit, as well as positing them on Internet for all your neighbors to see?

    113. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I assume if it's worded properly it would stand up in court, since it was my lawyer who suggested the clause in the first place...:)

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    114. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by hesiod · · Score: 1

      He was a lawyer, so he knows that making fun of them is fine, but making straightforward claims of such legal wrongdoing would probably not work in his favor.

    115. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by smartaleq · · Score: 1

      I think you digress more than you refrigerate; sadly, this post is resplendent.

    116. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Mr.+Jaggers · · Score: 1

      We would need a custom search engine spider to index publicly available docket numbers, dates, defendant & plaintiff names, etc., in municipalities nationwide. There, as far as I can tell, is no standard (as in web API) that these sites use, and not all cities have a web site displaying their court cases. However, folks could customize one to their local city/borough/county court web site, and then present that data via some agreed-upon standard API. Then, they could list their URL with a national registry/site that then polls each listed URL to update it's larger database. I would say that the local spider/gatherer sites would likely offer RSS/Atom feeds with each article content containing a metadata-formatted case, in some sort of structure. It could be in XML, or better ASN.1 to save some bandwidth. As long as it's all public info, there is no liability here (i.e., it is not illegal to name defendants in active court cases if such names were presented publicly by the court, on their web site).

      Unfortunately, on many sites, one can search for active cases and see public record, but the search requires partial names or docket numbers, rather than listing those on the docket for that day.

      Anyway, this could be done, with some limited success and the following resources: one person (a Slashdot reader) per court district with some bandwidth and some web admin skills, some coders to produce the customizable spider/indexer/database in some distributable format, and then, the whole national website & database itself. That last one might actually cost some money, and sounds like a candidate for the EFF to host.

      So, there. I've sketched the architecture. Go do it.

      --

      When I grow up, I want to have Christopher Walken hair.
    117. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      You get points for the contradiction between sadly/resplendent, but I think "refrigerate" was the better malapropism, for sheer recidivism.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    118. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by sjames · · Score: 1

      In other words, "litigate if you like, but I *WILL* drag your shady tax dodge into the public record".

      As others have pointed out, anyone threatened by Monster can now google the reply and the legal tactical nuke it contains.

    119. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by sjames · · Score: 1

      The point is, the loopholes are tricky and require very specific arrangements. Get caught in one little slip-up and you're on the hook for years of back taxes.

      Any company trying that gambit will NOT want the arrangements too carefully documented in court.

      One way they could be bitten is if the "leasing" of the IP rights by the U.S. corporation looks too much like ownership.

    120. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...or even some guy that just has a couple of rental properties and dabbles
      in options trading. People that probably file the EZ form probably shouldn't
      be whining about the complexity of tax law.

            If your taxes are interesting enough that you have any standing to whine
      then you have a real professional accountant (or you are just a moron).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    121. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by sjames · · Score: 1

      I presume your arrangement is all perfectly legal, but is only PART of what Monster is doing. If you were to create "Rooster LTD." a bermuda company, sell it your patent, then lease it back with all rights so you can avoid paying taxes on the lease money, it might be quite another matter.

      At the least, it might be complex enough that you wouldn't want it examined on the record under a legal microscope by a hostile party.

    122. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Aehgts · · Score: 1
      Have a look around the company web site, there's more!
      Here's a choice quote from the HDMI cables page:

      HDMI is a digital signal format, developed primarily as a platform for the implementation of HDCP (High Definition Content Protection) to prevent consumers from having complete access to the contents of high-definition digital recordings. As one might expect from a standard that was developed to serve the content provider industries, rather than the best interests of the consumer, HDMI is something of a mess. [..snip..] As more and more manufacturers move to implement HDMI on more home theater devices, however, it falls to the consumer to try to make the best of this dubious and poorly-thought-out standard.
      --
      "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    123. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah...was definitely a fun read if nothing more ...
      Somehow I don't see Monster pursuing this much further...

    124. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      Ah! I'd read your correction and thought it was the original. My apologies; you are correct.

      GOOD: "I am unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it." (as you wrote)

      LESS GOOD: "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

      That said, I don't think it's a tremendous sin. It's a use of the semicolon I could forgive.

    125. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Secrity · · Score: 1

      A great example of that sort of thing currently being done for the SCO litigation is at http://groklaw.net/

    126. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's cold.

    127. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Yes- this fellow seems, shall we say, cooperative to anyone else in the same position, and he has called every bluff they have, with ruthless glee.

      Best thing I've read all MONTH. Just beautiful :)

  2. Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my opinion, Monster cable has been taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge of the general public to convince people to buy EXTREMELY expensive cables, when much cheaper cables would provide equal performance.

    Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate.

    1. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Didn't somebody do a "golden ear" A-B test that determined that Monster speaker cable was no better than an extension cord with the connectors cut off?

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

      They might have had some (quickly rebutted) case in the analogue era, but with the digital era they are just outright cheating customers. You can get an HDMI cable for as low as 15 cents, but Monster continues to charge up towards $100 for theirs. Obviously with digital any cable is as good as another, because the system has error correction built into it and is not susceptible to distortion from nearby wiring.

      Still, on Usenet I've seen people who, probably because they already "invested" thousands of dollars in Monster Cables, placed so much trust in the company that they brought out arcane arguments that, yes, Monster digital interconnects are better than anything else on the market. After all, can't you hear how "brighter" and "warmer" the sound is once you've blown money on the interconnects?

    3. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by peipas · · Score: 3, Informative

      EXTREMELY expensive cables That is 100% correct. I bought a spool of 12 gauge speaker wire from Lowes for pennies on the dollar spent on Monster cable.

      There is one Monster product, however, that was worth the purchase. I sought an FM modulator and while none that I tried had any problems with reception, the several I tried before the Monster unit had awful, flat sound quality. In this case the premium was for a superior product, not just a name.
    4. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Ariastis · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they did it with a coat hanger (At the consumerist)

    5. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by pthisis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my opinion, Monster cable has been taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge of the general public to convince people to buy EXTREMELY expensive cables, when much cheaper cables would provide equal performance.

      Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate. I agree with your basic point, but I'd add "And the connections are all solid." (including good soldering/other connection from the wire to the plug and good contact plug-to-jack, or good direct wire-to-component connections for plugless cables)

      But yeah, there are standing offers out there from a number of sources for anyone who can consistently double-blind ABX the difference between various "high-end" cables and much cheaper large gauge copper wires.
      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    6. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by packeteer · · Score: 1
      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by TheRealFixer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty much. Here's a good article that summarizes the state of "premium" cables.

      http://www.electronichouse.com/article/the_truth_about_high_end_cables/C29

    8. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Several times, and the physics of why Monster cables do nothing that plain wire can't do is well understood. Bulk 12 gauge multi strand copper is all you need for the highest end gear, and most people won't be able to tell the difference between that and lamp cord without an oscilloscope.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    9. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by hudsonhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, the Consumerist did no such thing. If you read the article, all the Consumerist did, in fact, was quote a 4 year old post by a random dude on an internet forum.

      That's hardly what I would call a reliable source of information, and yet people continue to perpetuate the mean as truth because it appeals to their pre-existing notions.

    10. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Monster's connections aren't solid, they're too tight. People equate cable thickness and connector tension with a "solid" feel and therefore quality, so they bulk up the insulation and make the connectors at the tightest end of the tolerance.. This often ends up damaging the jacks they plug into unless you're really careful when pulling them out.

      TOSlink cables are sort of a pain, and take a lot of finagling to get out sometimes, but the only TOSlink cable I had where the plastic shroud at the end actually broke off was a Monster cable (I got it with my equipment as a promotional thing). The thin vinyl "fabric" wrapping has also torn away from the plugs.

      Possibly I could get a free replacement for that cable, though I think it's just on their "high end" gear. But frankly it would cost less to just buy a cable off amazon or overstock.com.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    11. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really like listening to my stereo and have spent some money on it.

      In magazines like Stereophile, they actually measure equipment and such as amplifiers and speakers. These measurements show differences in frequency response, THD distortion, intermodulation, and so on. One can see why speaker A sounds different from speaker B.

      However, I have not seen any of these measurements for cables. They do not appear in magazines or in cable manufacture advertisements. My theory is that the differences are not measurable or that the measurements do not show significant difference between cables. This I would be willing to accept.

      The thought that a digital cable, power cable, or wall receptical has any impact on sound would be laughable, except that people waste good money on these things.

      Anyone got an extra green marker? :)

    12. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean that Monster Cables running to Bose speakers WON'T make me cool?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by dmd53 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember that! I've just spent the last semester studying the properties of materials affecting conductivity, and my main conclusion has been... copper is pretty darn good for the price. Sure, there are some fancy things you can do like doping it with silver and the like, but the addition of most things will actually raise the resistivity of the alloy. For good hi-fi, all you need is pure copper, and I'd be very surprised if Monster has a patent on that.

      By the way, this isn't the first time Monster Cables has used frivolous lawsuits to their advantage-- they also have a habit of suing anyone with the word "Monster" in their name:

      http://www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/HallOfShame/MonsterCable/MonsterCable.shtml

    14. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Sandbags · · Score: 4, Informative

      Equal performance is subject to debate. True, a simple increase in cable guage provides better signal, but filtering of external interference, Monster does that a bit better than their competitors. Is it worth it though? If you install properly sized cables and route them away from sources of interference, it's no big deal.

      Now, that's really for analog signals... As for digital, it's not really a concern. A $15 HDMI or DVI cable is just as good as a $85 HDMI cable, assuming they're both rated for the same frequency response and distance (HDMI has several classifications, and it CAN make a difference).

      As for fiber cables, light is light. A thicker, stronger shell simply helps protect you from over bending the cable and refracting the beam, but it adds no shielding or signal quality improvement of any kind, and in fact, the fiber core itself must be a very specific size in microns. Changing this size like you do in ordinary cables is not optional.

      If you have a high end system, increasing cable thickness, adding better cable contacts, and improving shielding can be important, and can improve audio and video quality. On the other hand, unless you're running cables across power lines, very close to speakers, close to tube TVs, or over long distances, Monster offers no "discernable" differences vs their half priced competitors.

      That said never use the cheap shit cables that actually come in the box. Allways buy quality replacements, and ensure the connectors are made from materials that don't corrode (i.e. not copper, silver, or aluminum) gold contacts are great, platinum is not worth the expense. In most cases you'll need new cables anyway just to make the distance between devices as 3' is almost never enough, but don't buy cheap unshielded cables ever. Allways look for decent stuff.

      When buying a stereo or speakers, look to buy models that support screw on connections or tightening rings for the speaker wire. The cheap little clip style slots, like you typically find on the back of cheaper speakers and all-in-one stereo units do not provide a sufficient contact surface for 100 watt and higher outputs.

      As for filtering, modern home theater equipment is more computer than TV or stereo, and this stuff is VERY sensitive to low quality poewr. A surge protector is WORTHLESS! You need power filtration with real time voltage regulation. Monster does a good job providing very high quality filtering systems for as little as $200-300. If you have high def, a suround sound stereo, a PS3 or xbox360, keep this in mind. 97% of all electronic failure is the result of low or inconsitent power. Surge protectors only stop massive oversurges (typically over 160 volts). Damage to computer electronics cn occur at voltage below 104 or above 116. Do your lights ever flicker in your house? Especially when your AC turns on or when your fridge kicks in? If so, GO BUY A POWER FILTER for every digital device in your house!!!

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    15. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Shados · · Score: 1

      Seriously. This has always cracked me up... especially since nothing seems to be able to convince people that quality of wires (above a certain level... extremely shitty wires will have issues at extreme levels) is insignificant with digital and that it is so by design... I mean, its how the internet works, and god knows here's a lot of "noise" on the line, yet my text files sent over instant messengers are accurate :)

      But nope, it doesn't get through. Monster HDMI cables >>>>> ALL, and nothing to do to convince anyone otherwise.

    16. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Informative

      an HDMI cable for as low as 15 cents [amazon.com] Actually, $5.05 shipped :)

      Most of the other sellers offer it for $2 with $3 shipping, if you prefer...
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    17. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Taagehornet · · Score: 1

      One thing that really puzzles me is how the shift toward digital signals hasn't changed anything at all.

      One should think that the advent of the PC would have made people more tech savy, realizing that cheap hardware will do the job just fine, but apparently you can still find someone willing to pay $5900 for 1m low-bandwidth data cable.

      Perhaps it's the same fool who'd already bought the $4600 power cable.

    18. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...most people won't be able to tell the difference between that and lamp cord without an oscilloscope. Actually, outside slashdot, most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference even with an oscilloscope. They'd just look at it and ask, "WTF is this thing and why is it in my living room?"
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    19. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by doombringerltx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And also these coat hangers only made a 2m long connection. They don't have any shielding so if you run them over long distances you will get interference. While 2m is more than long enough for a simple home stereo, some people need longer cables. For example at my parent's house, my dad has his sound system set up in the living run but has cables running through the ceiling to the patio and to the kitchen so he can listen to music while he cooks. A 50ft unshielded cable would sound awful and staticy. I still think monster cables are a massive rip off but, assuming that the forum post is legit, comparing the cables to a wire hanger at that short of a length isn't really fair and its not surprising they had similar sound.

    20. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by LordNimon · · Score: 1, Informative

      Obviously with digital any cable is as good as another.

      That's not true. On higher frequencies (like 1080p DVI), a cheaper cable will distort the signal so much that error correction cannot fix it. Besides, error correction is meant for random, infrequent problems. It should never be used for generally poor transmission.

      This page will explain it.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    21. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      There are a few things that will make a difference in a cable in some cases. For example, depending on the amount of electrical noise nearby, shielded cables may make sense -- but I would expect that's the exception rather than the rule. The other obvious thing is connectors -- mechanically sound connectors that don't corrode over time, and don't come loose, are important. But that's really a ease of use question, mostly, rather than a sound quality one.

      I'm not an audiophile, but I do enjoy good sound, and I've done analog signals work at similar frequencies and levels of precision. My experience has been that you only really need to worry about things like shielding in electrically noisy environments.

    22. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Just to echo this comment, Monster does seem to make the best FM transmitters. I've tried virtually every FM transmitter made for iPods over the years, and the $60 (ack!) Monster charger/transmitter is by far the best.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    23. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and I'd be very surprised if Monster has a patent on that.

      This is about design patents rather than a utility patents. It's probably more comparable to a trademark than a utility patent. An example of a design patent would be the Coca cola bottle.

    24. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks for the warning. You've convinced me not to use coat hangers in my setup.

    25. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Taagehornet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Monster continues to charge up towards $100

      Actually they aren't the biggest thieves, how about $5900 for 1m of low-bandwidth data cable? It puzzles me somewhat that no one has sued the so called high-end audio cable industry for fraud and false advertising.

    26. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's fair to include the 'wall receptacle' in your list of things that don't matter. It's important to pay attention to your ground paths, and really shoddy wiring can introduce that unfortunate 60 cycle hum into your audio.

    27. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by moexu · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean that Monster Cables running to Bose speakers WON'T make me cool? I'm pretty sure the proper term for that is douchebag.
      --
      "Seek first to understand." - Socrates
    28. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate. I cannot disagree with the (implied) logic here, and I can't speak directly to the issue since I cannot afford any fancy cables. However I must admit to drooling over these for my HD600s.

      99.99% pure silver 24AWG Teflon insulated stranded conductors. How could any geek not at least be tempted by that? Even ones without "golden" ears? If you are going to spend money you may as well get something that will actually measure differently with a multimeter (in addition to qualifying as a precious metals investment).
      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    29. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by torkus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but no. On several grounds.

      Yes, you can buy a DEFECTIVE HDMI cable. One that actually works will - quite simply - work.

      Second, error correction is meant to fix ... errors. As long as your errors don't exceed the maximum corruption threshold it doesn't matter how many it corrects. This is basic probability and statistics. For a more empirical example - look at your good old CD. Error correction is done frequently with no data loss except in gross cases.

      Digital systems have very specific signal specifications. Your data either comes across intact according to those specs or it doesn't. pass/fail. 1 or 0. There is no subjective measurement. There is no 'brighter' sound. That's the WHOLE POINT of digital.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    30. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by webrunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      How ironic is it, that a company known for it's cables really only does good work in wireless?

      --
      ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    31. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ACTUALLY, outside of slashdot most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a lamp cord and oscilloscope...

    32. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Pretty amusing. But it does make me wonder about other environmental factors. Strong radio broadcasts, lots of static electricity in the air, etc. Not saying Monster cables are worth more than standard ones, but I think there might be something to be said for shielding cables.

      Also, I would wonder if the shielding matters more or less to digital speakers.

    33. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by pbhj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      97% of all electronic failure is the result of low or inconsitent power. That's funny that's the same percentage as that of statistics made up in slashdot posts ...

    34. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      It's this kind of reasoning, that higher price must be an indication of quality, that led to my university increasing tuition by 7% in one year, to "maintain parity" with ivy league schools.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    35. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kindly mod parent up, thanks.

    36. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate.
      Mostly true, but quality is worth paying for.

      Gold plating will help resist corrosion. Thicker cables are also more likely to resist breaking. For line-level audio & video stuff, more shielding is better, especially for long runs and near 120V lines. Also the connectors (and the wires where they enter the connectors) is the place most likely to break, so premium connectors with nice strain relief are definately nice to have.

      I am more than happy to pay a little more for premium cable that I know won't break or cause me problems. It is frustrating to spend 15 minutes debugging a piece of video equipment, just to find the problem is a cable that has broken (I know from experience).

      I have never purchased Monster, but would have considered it if I could find them on a great sale. Now that I know what type of low-life scum-sucking company they are, I will not touch their stuff with a 10-foot pole, even if they were giving it away.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    37. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      LOL, I hadn't even thought about that. I'm totally stealing that line any time I recommend their transmitter in the future, though :)

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    38. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      What nonsense. Digital is not fool-proof. All it means is that with enough interference you lose ALL of the signal.

    39. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by torkus · · Score: 1
      I have to nitpick a few things:

      As for fiber cables, light is light


      Depends, fiber quality CAN matter. (i don't use fiber in my audio gear) If you're running analog over fiber it DOES matter to the same degree that you can get loss on any analog line. Cheapy fiber is just crap plastic and you can get loss on it if there's no error correction.
       
       

      Damage to computer electronics cn occur at voltage below 104 or above 116


      Funny, because my normal line voltage is 120v all day, every day. Your underlying point is valid though - crap in = crap out (where "in" is your mains power). Another thing many people miss when setting up anything bigger than a bose stereo + TV is ground loops. There's your whine, buzz, scrolling line on TV and so on.

       

      GO BUY A POWER FILTER


      Agree.
      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    40. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... outside slashdot... most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a lamp and an oscilloscope.

    41. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Care to provide any data to back up those claims? Where are you getting that 97% number from? I have lights flickering all the time in my house and yet not a single electronic device has failed. Some are 5+ years old.

    42. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by sheldon · · Score: 4, Funny

      As for filtering, modern home theater equipment is more computer than TV or stereo, and this stuff is VERY sensitive to low quality poewr. A surge protector is WORTHLESS! You need power filtration with real time voltage regulation. Monster does a good job providing very high quality filtering systems for as little as $200-300. If you have high def, a suround sound stereo, a PS3 or xbox360, keep this in mind.


      LOL!

      Those are probably one of the biggest scams yet from Monster. ;-)
    43. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Four_One_Nine · · Score: 1

      I'll see your $5900 data cable, and raise you a $7250 pair of 12 foot speaker cables. http://www.pearcable.com/sub_products_anjou_sc.htm How do these people sleep at night.

      --
      I did it for Johnny.
    44. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between that Lowe's stuff, and higher quality cables... especially as lengths increase.

      However, there are many lower cost (but higher quality) cables available that don't cost nearly as much as Monster stuff.

      Point being there is a spectrum here, and there is a difference between the cheapest available, and higher quality cables. There are cheaper ways to get high quality cables than Monster.

    45. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      So far as I know there is no commercially available digital speaker. There are speakers that are marketed with the word "digital" on them, but they are still just analogue speakers. There are some digital amplifiers, which in theory can reduce energy consumption, but they still go through a DAC before the signal hits the speakers.

      The only places I would bother with shielded cables are: In your car, and long runs in your house where the audio signal cable comes close to AC circuits (specifically those tied to ceiling fans)

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    46. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean, its how the internet works, and god knows here's a lot of "noise" on the line, yet my text files sent over instant messengers are accurate :)

      Mabye urs r, but mine hav obvius signl 2 noiz isues. It muzt b teh cabels, and not ne problams with are skool sistems.

    47. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      If you are doing long runs near 120V lines using line level signals, the correct solution is moderately priced balanced (XLR) cabling, and equipment designed to work with such connections. Spending extra money on unbalanced connections is a losing proposition.

    48. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      EQUAL??? have you ever dissected a "monster" cable?

      Most of the time the $1.25 stereo RCA cable is of better quality than the $27.99 cable from monster. I have found only 3 strands of copper inside a monster stereo RCA cable after I get past all the useless rubber, plastic braid, cloth, foil... their cables are absolute crap. I'll use china cheapies WAY before I'll touch a monster cable.

      Hell Typicall when I have customers with problems with their HDMI it's the Monster cable. Swap it out with a cheapie or if they are the typically silly "videophile" I'll give them a "binary" brand that looks like it's expensive but passes our in house testing on the cable certifier. I have had Monster HDMI cables fail more often then they work on our cable certifier.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    49. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Funny

      (in addition to qualifying as a precious metals investment).

      My taxes are complex enough without having to qualify my sale of old cables at a yard sale as a capital loss, thank you.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    50. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by donutface · · Score: 1

      While I disagree with Monsters high prices on cabling, HDMI's error correction isnt perfect. The cable is still a one way stream so theres no way for your TV to request for your Bluray player (or whatever you might have hooked up) to resend a packet, and the high end cable companies are selling on the basis of a reduced error rate. Generally for anything below 5 metres though it doesnt really matter.

    51. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Pax00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know man... most people I know would look at the oscilloscope and ask where the LSD was.

    52. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by AJWM · · Score: 1
      Please tell me that's a parody site. Or at least that those products are parody items on a legit site.

      "The Ruby Mountain features truly massive G6 Silver-Gold conductors in our proprietary X-Balanced Micro Technology geometry. The ultimate in power, dynamics, resolution and transparency. Supremely musical, simply the best power cable available."


      In a power cable. Right.

      For that price they'd better be rewiring my house.
      --
      -- Alastair
    53. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      A 50ft unshielded cable would sound awful and staticy.

      So? Nobody said you should use a 50' ft coat hanger.

      I still think monster cables are a massive rip off but, assuming that the forum post is legit, comparing the cables to a wire hanger at that short of a length isn't really fair and its not surprising they had similar sound.

      Its fair for cables at that short of a length. And MOST cables are that short of a length. 4 of my 6 home theatre speakers are within 2m of the reciever. And All of the components are with in 2m of the receiver.

      So monster is clearly an obscene rip off for probably 13 of the 15 cables in my HT. The two 30ft lines that handle the rears would be undecided, and a separate test for those would be needed. Fortunately, I can tell you that I used wire much much cheaper than monster for those too, and its been 100% interference free.

      I can't say for sure whether or not the misaligned copper atoms and the odd trapped oxygen molecule in the sheath are muddying the sound, which is what monsters marketing materials are telling me, but I guess my ears just aren't that good... but I am debating springing for the monster hdmi cable which is designed to let those 1's through without getting turned sideways and making my picture quality less warm and the audio less punchy. :)

    54. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is called a computer UPS, and a small one can be bought for about $40.

      UPSs will bump power up if it goes too low and cut it if it goes too high (and go onto battery).

      In fact, the more recent APC UPSs you can set what voltages you want as your thresholds. $200 my ass.

    55. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure of your statistics, but I am looking into getting some form of power filter for my new TV. I'm not sure what caused it, but I recently lost my DVD player and the AV inputs on my TV; I opened up the DVD, and the fuse wasn't blown, so I don't think it was a huge surge or anything. I'm looking into protection for my new LCD TV, but it's next to impossible to wade through all the claims & counter claims out there (try reading some of the threads on AVS Forums, for example). I'll probably let inertia take hold & stick with a decent surge protector...

    56. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but all you have to do is cover the coat hanger with electrical tape, cover the electrical tape with tinfoil, and ground the tinfoil.

      That's a lot of work to save two bucks, but if you need to splice a shielded cable just tape the splice well, cover it with foil making sure it connects to and covers the shields on both sides, then tape that up.

      Works like a charm, no interference or hum at all.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    57. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by bonehead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody is claiming that digital is foolproof.

      What's being stated, which is a fact, is that with a digital signal, if you're not seeing and/or hearing a blatantly OBVIOUS problem, then higher quality cables will offer you NO benefit.

      A $200 HDMI cable will not offer a sharper or brighter picture than a $10 cable. It will produce the EXACT SAME picture. (Provided the obvious assumption that the $10 cable isn't so extremely substandard that it's producing obvious flaws in the picture.)

    58. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

      What's more ridiculous is that they want $260,700 for a 50 m cable.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    59. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 5, Funny

      You obviously don't understand digital. Digital is all ones and zero's. If you have a kink in the cable, because it is made cheaply, then the 0's, being as they are round, can slip around the kink's, but the 1's, having sharp edges, pile up.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    60. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Switching power supplies will handle substantial voltage excursions by simply changing their sampling rate. I was in my lawyer's office one time when the electrician was explaining that a fault had raised the plug voltage to 190 V and that she didn't understand why the computers had continued to operate.

    61. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by afidel · · Score: 1

      If you have a long enough run or low impedance speakers you might need 10 gauge, but yeah standard copper wire is good enough for any setup because the physical imperfections in the rest of the system dwarf any minor electrical imperfections in the cable.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    62. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if only the size of the wires is adequate. So, are you saying that size doesn't matter, as long as is adequate?
      That would explain many things here in /. :P
    63. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I heard somewhere someone replaced one of these expensive cables (I dunno if it was Monster or not) in a store display with a coat hanger and everyone thought it sounded better afterwards.

    64. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      No, you've got that backwards. The 1's, being skinny, can make it through the narrow spots where the cable is kinked, but the 0's, being fatter, can't. And this is why you should always strive to maintain straight cable runs for digital signals.

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    65. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...most people won't be able to tell the difference between that and lamp cord without an oscilloscope. Actually, outside slashdot, most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference even with an oscilloscope. They'd just look at it and ask, "WTF is this thing and why is it in my living room?" Wrong! In this post-9/11 control-by-fear world, the average person would take one look at an oscilloscope and run away screaming that there is a BOMB in their HOUSE!
      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    66. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Also, I would wonder if the shielding matters more or less to digital speakers.

      If they're 'digital' speakers, like they have an AES, SPDIF, Firewire or a TOSLINK input on the back, then the shielding is about as important as it is for any serial computer cable, which is to say it'll probably sound awesome until you get just enough noise for the error detection in the speaker inputs to cut the signal off; digital gear tends to play the audio either perfectly, or not at all -- it's designed to fail in a graceful but obvious way, so you KNOW you have a problem. I would note that AES and SPDIF don't have any redundancy data, they only do send a parity bit so the receiver can tell what it's getting is good, not necessarily correct it.

      For analogue audio, shielding is important, but using balanced lines is generally considered obligatory for any professional applications, at microphones and even line level voltages. Of course, RCA connectors and just about everything you buy for the home is unbalanced :P

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    67. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, their pro audio cables are also extremely competitively priced. 15' XLR cables for $20 and so forth. It's kind of weird.

    68. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "What nonsense. Digital is not fool-proof."

      No, but based on the medium being used for the transmission, and the frequency required, the data can be encoded in such a way as to ensure that the vast majority of the information is accurately received. For example, there's plenty of random noise in space, but we can still get clean transmissions from Mars and Jupiter.

    69. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      What's most ridiculous is that there are people out there who'll pay it... P.T. Barnum was right.

    70. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's true - a bad PSU can show up in all sorts of areas, such as bad video cards, interference on the display, or memory errors. A decent PSU is only about $50, so why not? I don't really plan to get a power filter for my stereo, though - when I move up to the big setup, it's going to get its own 20A circuit for the speakers.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    71. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by norkakn · · Score: 1

      If you are going to do a long run, and sound quality is important, you should use something balanced.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_audio

      Did you try unshielded lamp cord? I doubt that the kitchen is a very good room acoustically, and the speakers probably aren't great. A 50" run might not be too much of a problem.

    72. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I don't think it's fair to include the 'wall receptacle' in your list of things that don't matter. It's important to pay attention to your ground paths, and really shoddy wiring can introduce that unfortunate 60 cycle hum into your audio."

      Honest question here...what about the so called 'power conditioners' like Monster sells? I live in NOLA, where power is notoriously what I'd call 'bad'. There are brownouts and power spikes from time to time...would the power conditioner not help or is that BS too?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    73. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean you haven't bought a high speed DSL cable, which is a two-wire phone cable going between the DSL modem and the wall jack? It makes pictures and videos downloaded over the internet so much more realistic. It's like the brea^Wimages come alive!

      Now I need to get a Monster High Speed IEEE 1284 printer cable -- it's only 35 bucks. I'm sure my Centronics printer will be far faster, and the pictures more vibrant!

    74. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by toadlife · · Score: 1

      ensure the connectors are made from materials that don't corrode (i.e. not copper, silver, or aluminum) gold contacts are great, platinum is not worth the expense. I have to disagree. Non-corrosive connectors are only worth it if they are going to be in a corrosive environments. Otherwise they are not even close to being worth the money, over the standard nickel plated kind.
      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    75. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      speaker cables shouldn't need shielding. At those kinds of powers it is going to take a hell of a lot of intereference to have a noticable effect.

      Take a look at van-damme proffessional speaker cable (which is afaict what is used at many big events) and you will notice that it is not shielded.

      On long speaker runs your biggest problem is going to be volt drop so the most important thing is to use a thick cable.

      On the other hand line level cables most certainly do need shielding because of the much lower power involved. Balanced line is also preferable for long runs.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    76. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      I'm not terribly familiar with Monster's offerings in the power conditioning area. I do know that a good UPS will clean up spikes and dips, as well as provide the power backup functions.

      I know power conditioners are claimed to 'clean up' some of the noise inherent in poor wiring, as well as regulate voltage levels. I have never personally tried one, so I can't tell you much about them.

    77. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by toadlife · · Score: 1

      How do these people sleep at night. Probably very well in the brand new, expensive sleep number bed that they bought with the profits from morons.
      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    78. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by crossconnects · · Score: 1

      A typical power supply in many computers has to be switched to go to 220 v and can be damaged by much over 130v. This excessive voltage can be passed on to the motherboard and other parts of the computer, damaging them as well.
      A good power supply needs no voltage switch, and the best ones can handle up to 600 v on input without blinking, protecting your equipment.

      --
      no big sig
    79. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      The threshold between a few bit errors and catastrophic failure is so narrow it's not worth worrying about. Anything else the error correction can handle - but on any cable less than 5m I'd be surprised if there were any errors for it to correct. HDMI's error correction either works or it doesn't. If it does it's perfect, if it doesn't you're talking about more than a couple of bits and it'll be damned obvios.

      HDMI is twisted pair. This makes it *extremely* resilient to external interference (I'm running gigabit ethernet over 30m of unshielded twisted pair with no errors, and that stuff cost next to nothing)

      Also there's the HDCP wrinkle. An error in the bitstream that's uncorrectable is going to screw up the decrypt, leading to complete loss of picture. Any errors will be very, very obvious. I have seen this.. I have a cheap 15m cable that isn't quite up to job of 1080p/60, so every now and then the picture disappears and the PJ needs to resync the data stream. At 1080p/24 it's 100% perfect.

      This is *not* analogue. Different rules apply.. There is no gradual degradation Monster and their ilk are simply lying to take money from people.

    80. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Mine's looking at an increase of almost twice that for next year.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    81. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Damage to computer electronics cn occur at voltage below 104 or above 116
      Bugger I've been pumping 240V into them all these years!
    82. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wrong! In this post-9/11 control-by-fear world, the average person would take one look at an oscilloscope and run away screaming that there is a BOMB in their HOUSE!

      While true, this is awfully strange, since no bombs were involved in 9/11 in any way :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    83. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by crossconnects · · Score: 1

      resistivity of silver is only slightly better than copper, so my guess is even the most golden eared audiophile wouldn't be able to hear a difference.

      --
      no big sig
    84. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on the kind of connection if shielding matters. For speakers, no it really doesn't. Speakers are low impedance, balanced connections and as such are pretty much immune to noise. There just isn't much out there that produces sufficient amounts of interference to cause even a token response in speakers. Hence, regular line cord is a great choice for speaker cable, since the concern is low resistance. For consumer unbalanced interconnects it is a concern. They are very high impedance connections (input impedance on most devices is around 30k ohms or so) and very low voltage. As such, it doesn't take much interference to potentially be audible. Thus good shielded coax cable is the way to go.

    85. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Corrosion?

      If your AV equipment is in an area damp enough to suffer corrosion I suggest switching off the power and backing away, slowly, before there's a fire.

    86. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      For a 75cm cable. My desk is 72cm off the floor, so I guess the 2m cable would be a more reasonable length. That will set you back $11,000, or alternatively about £1.40 from my local DIY store.

    87. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by sbryant · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good for you if your 1's all come through lined up straight. I have a satellite dish, and some of the ones come in at 90 degrees to the others. (A zero can quite clearly be rotated to any polarity without making any difference.) Not only do my cables need to be straight, they need to be extra fat too! It's quite clear that Monster is the choice for DVB-S.

      -- Steve

    88. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Ah ha! that's what the government WANT you to think!

    89. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have a pretty gucci setup, and the 12 gauge wire supports the speakers, which are 6 ohm, just fine. I have 25 foot cable runs.

      For digital cables, power cleaners, and the rest of their product lineup, Monster's claims are pretty close to fraudulent.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    90. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but all my game consoles have a DC converter, and use a 10-cent part called a solid state voltage regulator on the output.

    91. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Probably very well in the brand new, expensive sleep number bed that they bought with the profits from morons.

      You're right, but I have to say, if they shelled out the money for a Sleep Number(tm) bed, then the morons-paying-too-much-for-brand-names cycle is continuing to function nicely.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    92. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      1) buy 25 dollars worth, and get free shipping

      2) Sell them at a flea market for 5 bucks a pop

      3) Profit!

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    93. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by tcgroat · · Score: 1

      If you're interested in performance, forget the over-hyped speaker wires. Buy heavy gauge zip cord at the local big-box store. Use the money you save to buy better speakers. From an engineering aspect, it makes no sense to spend large amounts of money for a minor improvement of something which has trivial impact on system performance (speaker wires). It makes good sense to spend more to improve the weakest link in the system (speakers, the last remaining electro-mechanical analog component under your control). Randi and Bob Pease have also weighed in on "high end" audio cables.

    94. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shielded Cat6, white = +, color = - Parallelize as needed.

    95. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for speakers, it's hard to imagine an environment where you'd need shielding -- with the one exception of long runs near 60Hz mains power.

      But, I've also seen noisy enough environments that I had indicator LEDs lighting up purely from the noise power. No, it wasn't turning on some high impedance input -- it was being directly rectified by the LED and producing enough light you could see the results. Of course, that particular problem was solved by fixing the noise issue, but my point is that even commercial parts from reputable suppliers can create a nasty enough environment to be worth worrying about.

    96. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      Speaking of this, I recently bought a Tartan branded HDMI cable from Blue Jeans Cable, as it was the cheapest reputable cable I could find ($9.50 for a 6 foot 24 AWG HDMI/DVI Cable).. Was I ever surprised when I received it, as it was larger and seemed to be of higher quality than any of my other HDMI cables, all of which were significantly more expensive.

      Unfortunately, I was going to place an order for some cables, but now the site is crazy slow because of all the hits..

    97. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is benefit to having a minimum level of quality in your digital cables. Yes there's error correction, but what if there are too many errors than can be corrected in the available bandwidth?

      You get dropouts or invalid data.

      Beyond that, I really don't know. does cable quality affect timing jitter?

    98. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      So far as I know there is no commercially available digital speaker. Meridian makes digital speakers. The DSPs, DACs, and amplifiers are all in the speakers. Sometimes this makes sense, as you can dispense with the passive crossover and replace it with a digital crossover and amplifiers for each driver.

    99. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Not to defend monster, but HDMI 1.3 is capable of 10.5 Gigabits per second. Some HDMI cables don't have the requisite shielding to transmit 10.5 Gb/s over 50 feet. Monster at least tests theirs.

      Do you have to buy Monster? Of course not. But some cheap hdmi cables max out at 720p, especially for longer cable lengths. If your projector (why else would you want a 50 ft cable?) displays sparkles, the cable may be at fault.

    100. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      That's about the one thing I wouldn't do for speaker wire. For a balanced signal-level line, maybe, but I'd have to look at the details. But for speakers, more copper really is better (within reason), and you won't get much copper with sane amounts of Cat6. Don't get me wrong, Cat6 is excellent cable, but it's engineered for all the wrong things.

    101. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually there are huge differences between HDMI cables, though many will only be evident in slightly higher bandwidth scnearios and as you attempt to run the cable a bit further. HDMI is quite difficult to get right because it is badly designed from start to finish -- could have really done with being a serial design, but it is in fact 4 parallel streams, all of which need to be well synchronised. just because it's digital, don't think it can't go badly wrong ;)

      take a look at Blue Jeans own FAQ on the concept, very informative reading: http://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/whats-the-matter-with-hdmi.htm?hdmiinfo

    102. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's bravo-sierra, I'm afraid.

      I run speaker connections through unshielded Cat5e cabling, to the patch panel, back out again to the remote speakers, which involved four RJ-45 connections (one at the amp, two at the patch panel, one at the remote speaker set). It goes through at least 50 feet of UTP. I quite honestly can't tell the difference between the speakers connected directly and via the Cat5. I use two pairs per speaker.

      Perhaps if you live in an electrically noisy place with lots of motors you'd get noise, but you wouldn't notice it for the sound of all the motors.

    103. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I do hate to bring physics to bear on a debate about audio cables, but twisted pair has higher capacitance between pairs than untwisted (not least because it's just plain longer and the insulation tends to be thinner). So if you do use it you're better off connecting both legs of each pair to the same speaker terminal. Shielded cables have non-negligible capacitance to ground too, so you are better off using UTP than STP. I've no idea how audible these effects might be, probably not very or not at all, but I suspect more audible than the reduction of noise you'd get from using STP and connecting each leg of the pair to a different terminal.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    104. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Running 1080p over 50 feet isn't easy, no. Which is why Blue Jeans themselves have only got certification on a 45ft run.

      But that doesn't mean Monster are justified in asking £89 for 3 feet of HDMI. The vast majority of Monster sales are on runs of less than 10 feet, where just about any cable on the market would work fine.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    105. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Performance of audio systems is not heavily affected by cables, if only the size of the wires is adequate. Exactly! Everyone knows that the wooden volume knob is the only thing that matters!
    106. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by silvwolf · · Score: 1


      Now I need to get a Monster High Speed IEEE 1284 printer cable -- it's only 35 bucks. I'm sure my Centronics printer will be far faster, and the pictures more vibrant!


      Make sure you get the one with Winky Blinky!

    107. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      There was an article on Ars Technica a couple of years ago about driving speakers from a unary (digital) signal. I don't know if it made it to market, but the concept isn't entirely ludicrous.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    108. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by bobkoure · · Score: 1

      The issue with digital audio is that the signals are self-clocking. There is some point at which cables (and, more critically, cable interfaces) start to screw that self-clocking up. Do a web-search for "jiter". That said, the cables don't have to be better than that (but I might shy away from ones that are fifteen cents, although they might be fine).

    109. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by bobkoure · · Score: 1

      I mean, its how the internet works, and god knows here's a lot of "noise" on the line, yet my text files sent over instant messengers are accurate :) Digital audio is self-clocking (so subject to jitter) and doesn't have an error-checking layer. Is that true of your internet connection?

      And no, I don't buy anything by monster and always try to steer friends somewhere else...

    110. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      How do these people sleep at night. On a large pile of money, with many beautiful women.
      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    111. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by sheldon · · Score: 1

      Yeah. A real problem is major power glitches, brownouts, dropouts, spikes and such. A surge protector will protect your equipment from the worst of it, the stuff that'll just come right up and fry components.

      A UPS will protect you from the brownouts and losing power.

      But in terms of noise... The power supply of the component is going to address that. Modern switching power supplies used in electronics are pretty damn good at providing flat DC current. Yeah, voltage may fluctuate a bit, but whatever.

      The amplifiers, though, still use the old style design of a transformer with a mass of copper wiring, a bridge rectifier and some massive capacitors. Solely because of power drain, an amp needs to be able to call up the Amps. This is all part of the dynamic range of the amp. My Rotel has a massive toroidal transformer, but even my Denon has a good sized mass of copper.

      I just always get a laugh out of the people claiming they put a power filter on their TV and suddenly the colors were more vibrant.

    112. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      7% would be way lower than the average tuition increase at my stupid ivy league school. In the last 8 years prices have doubled. That's more than a 10% increase per year.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    113. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      As for filtering, modern home theater equipment is more computer than TV or stereo, and this stuff is VERY sensitive to low quality poewr. A surge protector is WORTHLESS! You need power filtration with real time voltage regulation. Monster does a good job providing very high quality filtering systems for as little as $200-300.

      So, what you're saying is that the power supplies in your X-thousand-dollar units are insufficiently equipped to deal with normal power conditions?

    114. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, their pro audio cables are also extremely competitively priced. 15' XLR cables for $20 and so forth. It's kind of weird.

      Maybe because people who buy XLR cables know what cables should cost?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    115. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --97% of all electronic failure is the result of low or inconsitent power. Surge protectors only stop massive oversurges (typically over 160 volts).--

      Really, you mean the capacitors in those power supplies in that expensive equipment are really that cheap? If so, then I suggest buying cheap equipment. The power supply is supposed to filter the AC power. I think they (monster cable) are making a lot of money there too.

      Lightning can take out anything. I think it would figure in at more than 3%, references please?

    116. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Although yes, you CAN get a UPS for as little as $40, it's simply no where near powerful enough to handle a 700watt stereo, big screen TV, game station, and more...

      UPS units have very specific voltage limitations in terms of how much energy the battery can produce. The rating is in VAs (Volts time Amps).

      Take the Amp requirement on all the pieces and parts of your home theatre system, multiple that bu 120 volts, and you'll quickly see than even a $300-400 UPS can't handle the load. even if it could, you're talking about placing a massive device somewhere near your entertainment center, with a battery weighing 50-70 pounds, and cooling fans that make quite a bit of noise.

      Overloading a UPS battery can not only cause damage to your equipment, BUT IT IS A CLEAR FIRE HAZARD.

      The Home Theatre units do not use batteries, they use electrical buffers. TVs are not designed to be powered when there's no electyricity, so a small buffer of about 10-15 seconds is all that is needed. When power dips, fluctuates, or has "static" in the line, it can be cleaned. These units range in size and cost, but are typically about $200 on the higher end for full home thatre filtering of up to 12-20 AMPS. There are higher end units costing over $1000 that fit in and look like your existing self audio equipment, and provide additional features to safely shut down your electronics using infrared signals before cutting power in an outage, and also small batteries to keep your TV fan running for a minute or two for projection TVs (the bulb may crack if the TV looses power suddenly and is not allowed to go through a cooling cycle. These bulbs are not covered under most waranties and cost up to $300 each. Want to know more? RTFM).

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    117. Re:Monster cable has been taking advantage... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's how I do have it wired - each speaker terminal uses a pair.

      I think at typical audio frequencies though you're just not going to notice the difference.

      Since I don't get any noise via UTP, I doubt STP would be worthwhile.

  3. Once again... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot reposts a story found on Gizmodo that Gizmodo found on Digg that was first seen on reddit that...

    1. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot reposts a story found on Gizmodo that Gizmodo found on Digg that was first seen on reddit that... And the circle jerk of life continues. Fortunately for the denizens of Slashdot, Gizmodo, Digg, and Redit, as that is the greatest amount of non-auto-erotic genital stimulation most are likely to get this year.
    2. Re:Once again... by iamhigh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then submit it to /. sooner.

      Plus, since when is slashdot in competition with them? If I want to read stupid stories (surprised all the legal talk didn't scare the farkoids) and even worse comments, I will go to fark/reddit/digg. I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    3. Re:Once again... by mcmonkey · · Score: 0, Troll

      How long until this shows up on fark, linking to the story on /., about a story on gizmodo, ...

      I have mod points, but find no +1 sad. Is it that hard to follow the link to an original source, and leave credit in the summary? "I found [link to source] on Joe's web log," rather than, "Here's a summary of the summary found on [link to Jo's log]." But I guess that would require the subby to RTFA.

      Then again, what should I expect from the group that supports use of wikipedia by college students as a referenced source for research papers.

      (Yes, I am going for troll mods.)

      (No, I'm not really going for troll mods, but hope that by mentioning troll mods I'll get funny or insightful instead.)

      (I just jinxed it, didn't I?)

    4. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i couldn't care less

    5. Re:Once again... by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but Gizmondo has a rubbish comments system, Reddit is all about xkcd and how people are being mean to Barrack Obama (at the moment. A few months ago it was Ron Paul), and Digg is full of Digg users.

    6. Re:Once again... by somersault · · Score: 1

      (yarr)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? You think everyone has time to read every news source on the interweb? Some of us actually, you know, WORK rather than just surfing all day to find out who posted what where and when. But hey... if it makes you feel like you're the cool guy in-the-know then by all means stay the course. Lord knows we don't have anywhere NEAR enough doofi pretending to be investigative journalists already.

    8. Re:Once again... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Also, for amusing reuse and evolution of memes (along with not so amusing ones) and the creative-as-hell trolls.

    9. Re:Once again... by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      I submitted a story last week to slashdot about the release of RealPlayer11 and HelixPlayer 11 for Linux. These are new releases with new features that are actually attractive for the end-user. My submission was rejected...

    10. Re:Once again... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, for amusing reuse and evolution of memes (along with not so amusing ones) and the creative-as-hell trolls.
      Like, for example:

      I, for one, welcome our new unintimidated former lawyer CEO of a cable manufacturer overlord.

      Or, perhaps:

      In Soviet Russia, former lawyer CEOs sue YOU!!!

      Or maybe even

      1. Set up cable company
      2. Threaten lawsuits against other cable companies in existence
      3. Get settlements on all but one.
      4. Get bitchslapped by former lawyer CEO of said company.
      5. ????
      6. Pwned!!!!

    11. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then submit it to /. sooner.

      Plus, since when is slashdot in competition with them? If I want to read stupid stories (surprised all the legal talk didn't scare the farkoids) and even worse comments, I will go to fark/reddit/digg. I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues. you're joking about that last part right?
    12. Re:Once again... by Gori · · Score: 1

      ...intellectual commentary on current issues. With that little snippet, you sir have just made my day...
      --
      Complexity is a measure of our ignorance...
    13. Re:Once again... by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Intellectual commentary?

      You must be new here! Welcome.

    14. Re:Once again... by christurkel · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. I'll read the comments on /. to get a general sense of good/bad something is. One or two comments wont tell you much, but read 20 of the highest moderated ones and you a get sense of what's what.

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    15. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then go away. I mean, gawd, you have so much time to read every random web site. If nothing new is on /., then use your time to interact with real people instead of wasting it here.

    16. Re:Once again... by dow · · Score: 1

      Meept.

      I'll get my coat.

    17. Re:Once again... by fewnorms · · Score: 1

      I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues. You must be new here.
      --
      Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
    18. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real Player and Linux are dead. Real people use FreeBSD and mplayer to watch videos.

      Seriously though, I haven't even seen Real Player in use in over 5 years.

    19. Re:Once again... by howdoesth · · Score: 1

      He did say "halfway intellectual," which is probably too generous by half.

    20. Re:Once again... by MrWa · · Score: 1

      I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues. Why isn't this modded "Funny"?

    21. Re:Once again... by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      Put it in perspective (vs. digg, fark, reddit)

    22. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues. You must be new here..
    23. Re:Once again... by gatzke · · Score: 1


      You don't get halfway intellectual talk on digg?

    24. Re:Once again... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Every so often people bring up this or that news site that posted a story before slashdot. Slashdot is not slashdot because it is fast with the news. Slashdot is slashdot because of the user audience.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    25. Re:Once again... by interiot · · Score: 1

      Whereas reading the top 20 comments on Digg or Reddit tell you that conspiracy theories are actually believable, that it's the people who pay their taxes who are the silly ones, and that cats are really cute. (okay, maybe the last one is true)

    26. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said halfway...

      Oh, right ;)

    27. Re:Once again... by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      So? Join Audioholics.com or AVSFORM.com and you would been on the cusp of this budding story.

    28. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I come to /. to hear halfway intellectual commentary on current issues.
       
      Err, you must be new here...

    29. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but IMHO /. is pretty much days behind the ball generally. They used to be bleeding edge but now they are just another outlet for old news.

    30. Re:Once again... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      You're confusing "halfway intellectual" with half-witted.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    31. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netcraft Confirms it.

  4. From TFA by madjalapeno · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best line of the reply has to be "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

    1. Re:From TFA by croddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      the whole thing is just a litany of pwn. this is the most badass response to legal threats i've seen in a long time; this guy has given even the pirate bay's collapsible baton gag a run for its money.

    2. Re:From TFA by everphilski · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I love what he's doing but I said "damn, damn, damn" when he went on and on about about his experiences as a lawyer. Something tells me that might be the difference between Monster pursuing and not pursuing this case. Had he not laid all his cards out on the table, he might have got the fight he was looking for, and showed Monster they can't bully everyone around. Part of me is afraid that won't happen now.

      But either way, I'm glad he's sticking up for himself, and not just himself but making it public. Others will catch on, I hope, and be able to use similar arguments and techniques to evaluate settling versus taking a stand.

    3. Re:From TFA by masdog · · Score: 1

      That was a good line, but I liked the insinuation that the licensing agreement was just a tax shelter to avoid paying US Income Tax.

    4. Re:From TFA by masdog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think about it from a business point of view, he's basically saving his company a lot of legal bills and hassle by not dragging it to trial.

    5. Re:From TFA by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think he necessarily wants to go to court. The reason he's warning them of both his experience and the near-total lack of any reasonable claim against him is so that they walk away and stop bothering him. I'm fairly certain they will do that. They're not interested in a fight, only in making competitors cower and pay them money. It's rather classic bully behavior, but all bullies, big or small, will tend to stay away from anything that looks even remotely like an even match, or worse, one where they're bound to lose.

      What will piss them off, of course, is that the letter has been made public. But that's his perogative.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:From TFA by lurker4hire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I think we haven't heard the last of this, IANAL but I'm pretty sure Monster is obligated to respond to his VERY specific requests. Either by admitting that their initial claim was complete horseshit or coughing up the requested documents and proceeding through with the next steps required to continue the initial threatened lawsuit.

      If Monster doesn't, again IANAL, but doesn't Denke (the CEO of the small company) have a claim against monster for threatening frivolous litigation? Maybe even for anti-competitive behaviour considering that Monster (the 362KG gorilla) is trying to threaten a small competitor out of business?

      l4h

    7. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he necessarily wants to go to court.
      Exactly. Lines like this one:

      If I do not hear from you within the next fourteen days, or if I do hear from you but do not receive all of the information requested above, I will assume that you have abandoned these claims and closed your file.
      Make it clear he wants them to go look for easier targets and leave him alone. You don't have to defeat a bully, just convince him you're not worth picking on.
    8. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was intentional, as a fight is the last thing he wants. I doubt anyone would want to be tied up in courts for years in a lawsuit from which he has nothing to gain. He says he misses litigation, but I doubt he misses it that much :).

    9. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it may not have occured to many, but maybe he's really no bluffing and he really does want to wind them up. If he's really up for a fight, just for the hell of it or even for the fees at the end, then getting them to attack him with fore-warning may be exactly what he wants. The letter seems to be really careful, polite and nasty at the sametime. A masterwork for the aggressive. Perhaps some of his conference buddies have folded to them and lost out and now he sees an opportunity for revenge.

      IBM theory on this says: settle four out of five cases randomly to reduce costs. Leave a smouldering ruin for the other one out of ten which more than compensates for the other nine you settled. This may be the case which settles monster.

    10. Re:From TFA by lurker4hire · · Score: 2, Informative
      actually scratch that, this line from the original letter kinda negates that theory:

      "If I do not hear from you within the next fourteen days, or if I do hear from you but do not receive all of the information requested above, I will assume that you have abandoned these claims and closed your file."
    11. Re:From TFA by POTSandPANS · · Score: 1
      But what makes you so sure that he has laid all his cards out?

      --Sean

    12. Re:From TFA by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      If you go on to read this guy's site, I guess you could say that the only thing standing between them and world domination in Monster. They've got engineering talent in design, and believe that their local production process means they've got an edge in the production, while all competitors besides Monster appear to contract manufacture to China. If Monster's tactics include advertising to consumers about shielding from Martians (comic missing, sorry) and random drive by suit threats to stave off the low price competition, then writing a public letter will piss them off, because it makes the random letter sent less likely to succeed. I'm not sure you can undo luxury good consumer idiocy, but with a name like Blue Jeans Cable, I suspect they're trading on public recognition of Monster's marketing engineering.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    13. Re:From TFA by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the letter will piss them off, but at the same time, if the guy is right about their tactics, they'll have no interest in someone who is actually willing to take this all the way to a judge.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    14. Re:From TFA by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

      Agreed. What he did was smart from both a business AND a legal standpoint. Demonstrated that he's willing to take it all the way to judgement, but that he is absolutely holding them to the letter of the law in that the burden of proof is on Monster, and do they REALLY want to go down that road?

      What WE here at /. are hoping for, is that somehow this becomes big news and Monster is exposed to the masses for what they are - a corporate bully selling products that may or may not work as advertised using technologies which research has shown may be shaky at best and deliberately misleading at worst.

      I wouldn't hold my breath, however. It's not as interesting as Texas polygamist ranches or Britney Spears' hoo-ha.

    15. Re:From TFA by toofishes · · Score: 1

      I love what he's doing but I said "damn, damn, damn" when he went on and on about about his experiences as a lawyer. Something tells me that might be the difference between Monster pursuing and not pursuing this case. Had he not laid all his cards out on the table, he might have got the fight he was looking for, and showed Monster they can't bully everyone around. Part of me is afraid that won't happen now. He may have laid all his cards on the table, but do you think they were ever private anyway? I would think any good team of lawyers and investigators would have found this out ahead of time, although Monster did not. However, they surely wouldn't have made the same mistake twice- you can be sure they would have done their research after receiving this letter minus the last few paragraphs, and they won't be going after anyone in the future without doing a little background check first.
    16. Re:From TFA by turing_m · · Score: 1

      "Had he not laid all his cards out on the table, he might have got the fight he was looking for, and showed Monster they can't bully everyone around. Part of me is afraid that won't happen now."

      Just because he wrote that he was itching for a fight doesn't mean that he was actually itching for one. It's a good bluff though. If he enjoyed litigation so much, chances are he'd still be doing it. Still, a cool letter.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    17. Re:From TFA by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It's not as interesting as Texas polygamist ranches or Britney Spears' hoo-ha. Britney Spears has a sunken fence built into a ditch?
    18. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, but apparently she laughs:

      hoo-ha or hoo-hah (hhä)
      n. Slang
      1. A fuss; a disturbance: "the subject of this last hoo-hah" William Safire.
      2. A chortle or laugh: got a good hoo-ha out of that story.

    19. Re:From TFA by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Well it depends on how committed the general counsel is to the survival of Monster, and how intelligent Monster's owner is. Monster's a privately held company it seems, so you might be able to provoke a single influential person to commit to a courtroom date. But either way, the next guy's less likely to cave now, and Monster should be less likely to send these letters in response. A courtroom victory against Blue Jeans would vindicate Monster's entire patent threat campaign, but Monster would probably choose to hit someone a bit less prepared to handle the suit instead and may muddy the waters suitably for the next letter writing campaign.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    20. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not looking for a fight with Monster or anyone else. He's looking to run his business. He just isn't going to back down and pay up for frivolous claims.

  5. Summary... by binaryspiral · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Monster Lawyers,

    The mention of similarity between my company and yours makes me throwup in my mouth a little. Your threats are empty and vague. You provided no details to your patent hissyfit.

    If you're actually attempting to prove you own a patent on the RCA connector, then fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

    Sincerely,
    Kurt Denke

    1. Re:Summary... by Zordak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're actually attempting to prove you own a patent on the RCA connector... Actually, they're not. All they asserted were design patents, which are flimsy little patents drawn to the ornamental design of the product. They're actually a sort of bastard child you'd get from a weird threesome between copyright, trademark and patent laws. You infringe a design patent by selling a product that looks like the patented design. It has nothing to do with the technology. The fact that they sent five (essentially saying, "You're too close to all five of these different ornamental designs") is pretty good evidence that this was just anti-competitive grand standing. They were just hoping that Blue Jeans would see the word "patent" and think $4M litigation and roll over and stop competing.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:Summary... by techpawn · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're not. All they asserted were design patents, which are flimsy little patents drawn to the ornamental design of the product.
      And I love that he goes back to them with basically that RCA connectors are generic and have to be and unless they have documentation that shows otherwise that they are distinctly Monster Cable RCA connectors and that his connector is similar to buzz off... And they tried with 5 patents, one of which was expired.
      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    3. Re:Summary... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many of these legal firms are on retainer with a standing mandate from the company to "Protect our interests" with few boundaries. Now if they don't find anyone to sue or defend against they worry that they may not be seen as being worth spending so much money on so they have to justify their cost by looking for victims (sort of like parking police). So instead of just quietly guarding the company they start sending out letters like this.

      I also wonder how many of these legal firms act semi-independently of the company and fail to inform them of all their activities. "Ya, we just send out an embarrassingly weak threat to a small competitor that could backfire on us. Ummmm, we're fired?"

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:Summary... by torkus · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for Levis do decide the name is too close to one of their product lines.

      Hey, i bet mcguyver used wet clothes for conducting electricity at one point so there's potentially crossed product lines!

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    5. Re:Summary... by michaelepley · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, completely agreed. Summed up by the best three words in the letter: "...mere design patents."

    6. Re:Summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's the point. He was hinting that it seemed like Monster was trying to use design patents as if they were utility patents.

    7. Re:Summary... by hakr89 · · Score: 1

      If you're actually attempting to prove you own a patent on the RCA connector Actually it's not RCA cables, but HDMI cables that he is being attacked for. The only reference to "Tartan" cables on his site is here:
      http://bluejeanscable.com/store/hdmi-cables/tartan-hdmi-cables.htm
  6. A shorter answer by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I refer my learnèd friend to the case of Arkell v Pressdram.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:A shorter answer by debrain · · Score: 4, Funny
      Great reference. For those not inclined to click the link ...

      [The plaintiff, Arkell, was the subject of an article relating to illicit payments and so sued the defendant magazine Pressdram. The] magazine had ample evidence to back up the article. Arkell's lawyers wrote a letter in which, unusually, they said: "Our client's attitude to damages will depend on the nature of your reply". The response consisted, in part, of the following: "We would be interested to know what your client's attitude to damages would be if the nature of our reply were as follows: Fuck off".
    2. Re:A shorter answer by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

      Er.. the magazine's actually called Private Eye. Pressdram is the publishing company.

  7. This is exhibit "A" ..... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... As to why patent reform can't come soon enough.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:This is exhibit "A" ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a design patent, not one of those patents that you helpdesk chimps are always complaining about.

    2. Re:This is exhibit "A" ..... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's not.
      This is someone attempting to bully using the patent system, it is not the fault of the patent system at all.

      I would argue that these kind of people would threaten under some other pretense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:This is exhibit "A" ..... by Steve1952 · · Score: 1
      This isn't a patent reform issue. It's more of an attempted fraud by using patents issue. You can attempt fraud using almost anything. For example, consider the Chewbacca offense:

      Ladies and gentlemen of the supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider: this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk, but Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now, think about that. That does not make sense! Therefore defendant owes us money!

      Much better than the old style Chewbacca defense, no?

    4. Re:This is exhibit "A" ..... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      ... As to why patent reform can't come soon enough. I'm sorry, but why?

      This is merely an example of anti-competitive intimidation with vague references to "patents". The company has no real patents, and if they were to actually take the case to court, they would have their arses handed to them handily.

      "Exibit A as to why patent reform can't come soon enough" would be if this were taken to court and had a reasonable chance of succeeding.

      What is needed are better laws against intimidation to threat of frivolous litigation (and, of course, better enforcement of those laws).

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:This is exhibit "A" ..... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      No it's still a fundamental issue with the patent system, because the presumption of validity needs to be dropped. Just as the copyright office can't examine every work ever produced to see if yours is unique, the patent office can't examine every idea or invention.

      The concept that a bunch of patent examiners can perform this task is fundamentally flawed.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  8. 3 3 3 3 by bcdm · · Score: 1

    My man-crush for Kurt Denke currently knows no bounds. I will gladly have his love-children if he so asks, biology be damned!

    --
    I can has sig?
  9. Classic Small-Guy Shakedown by mpapet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every small company I've worked for has been shaken down this way.

    Step 1: Giant company sees small company as a real or imagined threat.

    Step 2: Initiate patent or Trademark litigation.

    Step 3: Repeat step 2 until small company is sunk under a mountain of legal bills.

    Step 4: Profit!

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  10. Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 1, Informative

    For more proof that Monster has nothing special, see the Consumerist's comparison of Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers. Nobody could tell the difference.

    1. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I'm not defending monster in any way, the information there on the experiment doesn't say what kind of music was played. If it were some rock album with some amount of distortion in the guitars already, then a coat hanger may really be just as good. Playing classical music with long silences over a coat hanger, however, may provide audibly different results than real cabling.

    2. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, it might upset a mime when a blank tape is played too loudly.

    3. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by hudsonhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you in fact read the article you're posting?

      The Consumerist did no such comparison. Rather, a reader sent them a 4 year old post from a random dude on another forum, which the Consumerist quoted and posted, turning it into a popular Slashdot meme.

      Groupthink at work, gotta love it. The burden of proof is always non-existent when it backs up your pre-existing notions of truth.

    4. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by gomiam · · Score: 1

      While I'm not defending monster in any way, the information there on the experiment doesn't say what kind of music was played.

      I guess I'll save you the hassle of re-reading the article:

      A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass). None of us had heard this group or CD before, therefore eliminating biases.

      Happy now?

    5. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by bogie · · Score: 1
      Yes it does. Read the original post.

      Volume levels were set at 75 Db at 1000K Hz. A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass). None of us had heard this group or CD before, therefore eliminating biases

      Keeping us blind folded, my brother switched out the Belden wire (are you ready for this) with simple coat hanger wire! Unknown to me and our 12 audiophile buddies, prior to the ABX blind test, he took apart four coat hangers, reconnectd them and twisted them into a pair of speaker cables. Good enough for me, although I already beleived this anyway. A wire is a wire is a wire and only fools think otherwise.
      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    6. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Maudib · · Score: 1

      Admittedly a tad off-topic but as we are bashing Monster-

      I don't really care what Monster charges for cable. What bothers me is that the retailers are in on it. If I want some cable and I want it NOW the only thing a place like Circuit City or Best Buy stocks is Monster or some over priced equivalent. I know I can go an order a cable that produces equivalent results online for $5, but if I want it that day the only thing to do is buy what Best Buy or Circuit City is stocking, which invariably costs $50.

      I have always wondered if there was the basis for someone who was far more litigious then me to file some anti-competitive based lawsuit against Monster and the retailers here. There is NO WAY that Radio Shack, Best Buy, Circuit City have all independently decided to only stock "high end" cables that unbranded sell for 1/10th or less online.

    7. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far less than you'd think, cable is only an issue for low level signals from passive guitar pickups or between a mic and pre-amplifier. At line level and above, cable capacitance is a none issue.

      I use van damme and sommer not because they provide any measurable performance over the cheaper stuff but because the quality is consistent and the cable is nice to work with. The same goes for Neutrik and Amphenol connectors.

    8. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he destroyed coat hanger made in wire. That proves he has good taste. Coat hangers should always be in wood or if you're cheap in plastic.

    9. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA: "A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played"

    10. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Phiu-x · · Score: 1

      But how will I be able to get entry into my car without these ? :)

      --
      This is a stolen sig.
    11. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ummm, if you're going to say something isn't in the linked article, you might want to actually read it.
      Specifically, this part:
       

      A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass).
    12. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it does. From the Consumerist article:

      "A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass). None of us had heard this group or CD before, therefore eliminating biases."

    13. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by pipatron · · Score: 1

      the information there on the experiment doesn't say what kind of music was played.

      Ok.

      A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass).

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    14. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the information there on the experiment doesn't say what kind of music was played. RTFA, of course it does: "A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass)."

    15. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing the markup on these premium brands is probably much higher too though. Why sell a $2 cable for $3 when you can sell a $40 cable for $50? Both take up the same amount of shelf space... I don't know real numbers, but I'm guessing it's easier for Best Buy etc to hide increased markup on the expensive brands, and if enough people are buying...

      Also my local Best Buy, Radio Shack etc do sell several other brands besides Monster cable, most (if not all) much cheaper. Especially Radio Shack, they have plenty of cheap cables last time I was there!

    16. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      Keeping us blind folded, my brother switched out the Belden wire (are you ready for this) with simple coat hanger wire! Unknown to me and our 12 audiophile buddies, prior to the ABX blind test, he took apart four coat hangers, reconnectd them and twisted them into a pair of speaker cables.

      Well, with twisted pair coat hanger wires, sure!

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    17. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Big Lots, or whatever equivalent you have nearby. I got an HDMI cable there for $12, thinking that it would get me by until I could order one online. But, at least in this case, I don't see a need to replace it. It works, the picture on my TV looks pretty, and I "saved" at least thirty bucks. They had a handful of all kinds of other cables and connectors, so I figure it's always worth checking out.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    18. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I read the article; I wouldn't link to it otherwise. If you want more precision, s/the Consumerist's comparison/the comparison posted on the Consumerist/.

      The article gives plenty of detail on their testing methodology, assuming the original poster didn't make it up, and nothing posted on the Internet can easily prove or disprove that possibility. Thus, take it with the same grain of salt you take with everything else on the Internet.

    19. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by sheldon · · Score: 1

      Coat hangers aren't very practical or easy to use, are they?

      The main reason I have bought more expensive cabling, has to do with aesthetics and usability. There is a lot of snake oil out there, but a lot of the midpriced cables are great and better than cheaper stuff.

      I've bought Monster interconnects before, and loved them. I don't like their speaker cable, because their connectors suck.

    20. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even click the link? From the article linked:

      "They were connected to an ABX switch box allowing blind fold testing. Volume levels were set at 75 Db at 1000K Hz. A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass). None of us had heard this group or CD before, therefore eliminating biases."

      Doesn't sound like "some rock album with some amount of distortion in the guitars already" to me.

      While I will agree that the test used a short interconnect and a longer run or higher RF noise levels may have caused more problems in a coat hanger, this test seems valid for the conditions posted. Of course, with networking over barbed wire working, I guess the 20Khz bandwidth you need for audio isn't so hard to believe. http://slashdot.org/articles/02/01/03/2039218.shtml

    21. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [audio bullshit]
      Yes, the electrons traveling through a conductor from point A to B sound more dynamic and "danceable" in Monster cables vs a coat hanger.
      [/audio bullshit]

    22. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by cain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Groupthink at work, gotta love it. The burden of proof is always non-existent when it backs up your pre-existing notions of truth.

      Prove it.
    23. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by torkus · · Score: 1

      Well how else do you think BB or CC makes up the margin difference when they run a TV on cut-throat sale for last-minute superbowl/holiday shoppers? Sure...here's ur $2000 TV which is going out the door with a 2% margin but you need this cable and this connector and this stand and this power filter or your picture will look like crap. Now you spent $2500 and their margin is up to 15%. Amazing eh?

      Just about everyone who sells things does this. TV, cars, cable/satelite programming...the list goes on.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    24. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Playing classical music with long silences over a coat hanger, however, may provide audibly different results than real cabling.

      Highly unlikely. A piece of wire (or short length of solid metal, which is just a very thick and rigid wire and better known by EEs as a "bus bar") is the most linear component there is. It doesn't introduce non-linear distortion the way an overdriven or underbiased amplifier does.

      Poor quality cables introduce frequency-dependent or "group" delays, which interfere with stereo imaging and in extreme cases form an audible band-pass filter. Electronic and distorted pop music has high frequency content and transients that an orchestra simply can't match, so those types of music show up cable deficiencies much more readily. These deficiencies are most often caused by cable capacitance and inductance (which have a far greater influence than the skin effect), but they're still linear, so a bad cable might make the sound muffled but it isn't going to make Andres Segovia sound like Metallica. It's not that kind of distortion.

      Silences (and dynamic range in general) are irrelevant; silence doesn't distort regardless of what it's played through because it is, by definition, no signal. Amplifiers add noise, true, but cables don't amplify; the noise and distortion component from a cable is purely thermal and shot noise* (which can induce significant non-linearities in signals where each electron counts, but for the purposes of a power amplifier that can be safely disregarded).

      And FWIW, I think Monster cables are a complete rip-off. 240V, 10A stranded mains flex has far lower capacitance and inductance, but slightly higher resistance (which is swamped by the crossover anyway), and costs a hell of a lot less.

      *I expect someone to mention microdiodes in conductors; to any such jackass, I'd point out that if microdiodes exist in cables (and they've never actually been measured, despite decades of research), they would also exist in the low level stages where the non-linearities would be proportionally greater and amplified along with the signal. The idea that a signal chain from microphone to speaker can have a totally clean gain of up to 140dB, yet audible distortion can be added by an unmesurable property of a component with no gain at the last stage is pure quackery, and that's being kind.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    25. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some quick research suggests wire hangers are 12 gauge and made out of solid steel; what the audio cable industry would call "solid core". Monster is a bit evasive about what's in their Monster Ultra Series THX 1000 speaker cables, saying only "4 large gauge copper conductors"; based on other Monster cable products I'd expect they're 12 or 14 gauge stranded wire.

      I do a fair amount of single-blind speaker cable tests myself, certainly more than this one anecdotal experiment. Differences here are subtle but I've done way too many comparisons with consistent results to think they don't exist. The best results in any listening comparison are always when comparing with music the listener is intimately familiar with, so their test starts out badly in that regard. Generally I prefer the sound of fat solid wire to anything else. People like stranded wire because it's easy to work with, but it doesn't sound as good as a solid wire of the same gauge. Accordingly, I'm unsurprised that they found the solid steel coat hanger wire to be similar to the Monster cable.

      The thing most people miss about that article is that there were two listeners who were cable of hearing the difference between the Monster product and the Belden cable they started with, suggesting there is an audible difference to cables--just not a major difference between the Monster and the hanger. I suspect that further, better tests would show a ranking like this:

      Belden 14AWG Stranded Copper < Monster 1000 ~= 12AWG Solid Steel < 12AWG Solid Copper

      I've had audiophile speaker cables here up to the $1000 price range (but not the expensive Monsters, their stuff is awful per dollar). Nowadays I'm usually happy with some hand twisted pair designs I wired up with 12AWG solid copper purchased from Home Depot. It's certainly superior to the 14AWG stranded cables I made out of an extension cord also purchased there. The extension cord "design" does sound better than most cheap speaker cables, including the budget Monster line; it is good quality copper and almost thick enough.

    26. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass).
      DUH? It only sounded better because it was easy listening music, eh...
    27. Re:Monster Cable versus wire coat hangers by hudsonhawk · · Score: 1

      More than anything I question the conclusions you've reached. Assume the anecdote is true - what does it really tell you? Does it tell you that Monster is bad wire? Or does it tell you that coat hangers make for good wire? Or does it tell you that the poster has poor hearing? You've assumed it's option A, judging by how you framed the article ("For more proof that Monster has nothing special...") and while I don't believe in Monster's virtues any more than those of coathangers, I'm not sure that's a safe conclusion to jump to. It certainly doesn't qualify as "proof" of anything, in any sense of the word.

      Another thing to note is that the post in question is describing a single-blind test. If you listen to Slashdot's chorus of anti-audiophile / skeptical crowd, anything short of a double-blind test is meaningless.

      Though I think their merits of double blind testing are debatable for when it comes to audio, it just backs up my notion that the burden of proof is different depending on whether or not the information supports your claim.

  11. Obligatory... by masdog · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this deserves an "OH SNAP!"

  12. Monster Park = Monster.com park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate these losers at Monster cable. They are a total rip off.

    What is funny, however, is that in San Francisco, the park where the 49ers play, it's called Monster Park.

    EVERYONE thinks it was named after monster.com, the job web site. Absolutely no one realizes that it's for Monster cables.

    Good work guys!

  13. This sounds familiar by arotenbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am evaluating your claim that the connectors on certain Tartan brand products infringe Monster's design patents and trademarks. However, the information supplied with your letter is plainly inadequate to support a claim of infringement and so I am writing to you to ask for further information and clarification regarding your claims.

    I will begin by addressing your trademark/trade dress claim. You have referred to two trademark registrations, and have attached some printouts from the USPTO system but the depiction of the marks on the drawings provided is small and indistinct, making it difficult to determine exactly what the alleged resemblance is, and I need further information from you. This made me laugh. Monster Cable wants to initiate a trademark suit and can't send a legible image of the trademark? Sounds like something SCO would do...
    --
    Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
  14. The world needs more Kurt Denkes by TheHappyMailAdmin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And we need them in a serious way. People who know their stuff, know what the legal system is supposed to be used for, and stand up for themselves in a positive way.

    I hope we see more small companies and individuals do this in the future.

    1. Re:The world needs more Kurt Denkes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we need more lawyers with principles, and the conviction to act upon said principles.

      Someone phone the endangered species people, and tell them to add Kurt Denke

    2. Re:The world needs more Kurt Denkes by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      Indeed, if only more 45-year-old litigation attorneys would stop practicing, set up small businesses, wait for an evil corporation to sue them, and then commit themselves to a financially ruinous lawsuit just to make a point, then the world would be a better place.

      /sarcasm.

    3. Re:The world needs more Kurt Denkes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the meantime buy his cables.

      And why isn't some environmental group going after Monster Cables for selling overbuilt, badly made, and over packaged (not to mention overpriced) pieces of junk?

    4. Re:The world needs more Kurt Denkes by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm? Fighting meritless lawsuits wouldn't bring world peace, but a world where companies didn't think bringing meritless lawsuits was a viable business plan would sure as hell be better than the world we've got now. People putting their principles before their financial or physical security is how you got the freedoms you enjoy now, smartass.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  15. Summary Missed Best Paragraph by iamhigh · · Score: 3, Informative
    I like this one...

    Further, if any of these patents or trademarks has been licensed to any entity, please provide me with copies of the licensing agreements. I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income; my request for these licensing agreements is specifically intended to include any licensing agreements, including those with closely related or sham entities, within or without the Monster Cable "family," and without regard to whether those licensing agreements are sham transactions for tax shelter purposes only or whether they are bona fide arm's-length transactions.
    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  16. Amen, brother, Amen by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When digg first came out, I thought it an incredible improvement on /. as far as getting timely stories, if they would only get nested comments. But then the fanboys hit, duplications made /. look as staid and conservative as the New York Times, and I gave up on digg. Far too much noise for far too little signal.

    And since then, /. has improved immensely. No doubt the competition helped, but I care not where the incentive came from, only that /. gets better and better.

    1. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much. I read Slashdot for the commentary (filtered - who needs Trolls), not the articles.....even when the posts are offtopic (like this thread), they still can be insightful and interesting. If it's a slow news day or I don't want to do any work, Digg gets a little more action....but that's because they post anything.

      Layne

    2. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again. /. has more than its fair share of mouthbreathers, but compared to most online forum/blog type things out there, /. reads like de Tocqueville in comparison.

    3. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by kericr · · Score: 1

      I don't know why this was modded as funny. A more appropriate term would be 'gospel'. I gave up on Digg a long time ago for that exact reason, and they seem to have no interest whatsoever in resolving their own issues.

    4. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I think Slashdot has just grown up a bit. A lot of the posts that are modded as Funny would have resulted in a flame war a few years back.

    5. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by bonehead · · Score: 1

      As someone who has been around /. for a very long time, and has also spent some time at Digg, I give Digg the credit for the vastly improved signal/noise ratio here on /. in recent times.

      Why you ask? Simple. All of the douchebags that used to make /. unbearable seem to congregate over there now.

    6. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up on digg. Far too much noise for far too little signal. But that's 'cause digg doesn't use Monster Cables to connect their servers and /. does.... Er, um... Wait a sec!
    7. Re:Amen, brother, Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I'm a douchebag and I resent that remark!

  17. When I was more naive by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I purchased some Monster Cables for my home theater. Now the damn connectors are coming off my speaker wires. I took them apart to find out that connectors are held on by a shoddy crimp job. For what they cost they could at least solder them. The rubber shielding is even starting to deteriorate. Not worth the money.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:When I was more naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monster has a lifetime warranty on all their cables. If something broke as a result of shoddy manufacturing, they will gladly replace it.

    2. Re:When I was more naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monster started out doing actual research into wire and cable effects and produced some revolutionary products. Maybe changing one patch cable doesn't make a noticeable difference, but rewiring a whole studio with better wire can.

      Now that their products hang on a peg in every electronics outlet, it's all about image. Most of that money would be better spent on equipment upgrades.

    3. Re:When I was more naive by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would suggest getting all of your cables from Blue Jeans Cable from now on. I know I will; Their prices for HDMI cables are almost as low as monoprice's.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    4. Re:When I was more naive by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      I notice you didn't feel confident enough in Monster cables to attach a name to this drivel. Is that, perhaps, because the "revolutionary" products they produced are, in fact, over-priced and over-hyped garbage, no better than bulk 12-gauge for any consumer use?

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    5. Re:When I was more naive by artg · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the quality of that particular cable but in general, correctly formed crimps give a superior result to solder. In particular, they're less likely to fail due to flexing. FWIW, I've never bought a Monster cable largely because I think they're a ripoff. I'm not defending this one - just pointing out that crimps need not be shoddy.

    6. Re:When I was more naive by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not implying all crimps are shoddy. I understand that there are places where a properly designed crimp is appropriate (like vehicle wiring harnesses). However, these crimps are no good. I took my system apart to move it over the weekend and when I hooked it back up several of the connectors were missing. It was in a cardboard box the whole time so I don't know what could have happened to it.

      It seems like the crimp is the weak point in the connection instead of the connector-to-speaker connection being the weak point. If someone were to pull on the wire the crimp would fail before the wire became disconnected from the speaker (not that I would do such a thing).

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    7. Re:When I was more naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Monster cables had a lifetime warranty. Try and take them up on it.

    8. Re:When I was more naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. 28AWG monoprice HDMI cable, $5.24. 28AWG Bluejeanscables cable, $4.80. And they have pricier stuff for people who feel they need the extra insulation and alleged quality of a Monster cable. Not bad.

    9. Re:When I was more naive by slams · · Score: 1

      Yup, Blue Jean Cable is now bookmarked. I will definitely check them out when the need for a good a/v cable arises. I don't mind doing business with those who have principle and ethics than those who don't...

      --
      -slams
  18. Ahhh, that was joyfull by mlwmohawk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have not enjoyed a letter like that in a long while.

    I think I have a new rule, right after "never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!" "Never challenge a former litigator who misses his old job."

    1. Re:Ahhh, that was joyfull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. One such letter that come to mind is this one, if you will recall:

      http://www.proposicion.org.ar/doc/gob/VillanuevaNunez-080402.html.es (original in Spanish)
      http://www.proposicion.org.ar/doc/gob/VillanuevaNunez-080402.html.en (English translation)

    2. Re:Ahhh, that was joyfull by labnet · · Score: 1
      Best line from the letter.

      Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it.
      --
      46137
    3. Re:Ahhh, that was joyfull by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      And the one that SCO forgot: "Never file an intellectual property lawsuit against IBM."

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    4. Re:Ahhh, that was joyfull by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      "never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!"

      perhaps you don't realize that those were the dying words of the Sicilian who uttered them? By that logic the former litigator should be expected to lose.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    5. Re:Ahhh, that was joyfull by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      perhaps you don't realize that those were the dying words of the Sicilian who uttered them? By that logic the former litigator should be expected to lose.

      If you are referring to "Princess Bride," which I assume you are as that is where the quote is most likely originated, in the mythos of the character, the rule is not, in fact, his.

  19. What this really points out is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, the real issue here is that every frakking time a large east-coast firm throws up some completely contrived and in this case completely confused claim of infringement, where is the Lawyer that will be able to send something like that on behalf of the poor schmucks that DIDN'T come out of a heavy damage litigation background?

    Does the DOJ need to aggressively treat all patent infringement claims such that the one filing the claim is audited by federal attorneys for relevancy? Should the patent office send out investigators and rip the claim apart before it gets to court?

    I, for one, would be SOL if a company the size of Monster came after me. I can't even START to mount a defense for this kind of thing. I applaud Mr. Denke but at the same time, I have to say that this is a serious lament for the system. You have to be a high-class lawyer to get this crap out of your company's hair.

  20. This is poetry by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only does he completely and thoroughly tear Monster's case apart, he also points out that Monster uses a Bermuda-based company for IP holding to shift income offshore and avoid paying US taxes. Not illegal per se, but also not something Monster would want broadcast.

    Although it may have taken some time to write this he absolutely ensures that Monster will never mess with him again and decreases the chances of Monster going after anyone in a similar fashion. He has done in probably less than a couple of hours what would normally take months of messy litigation.

    This guy is a hero.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:This is poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think part of his point is that Monster doesn't hold the patents they are suing under (they have no standing) they're held by the offshore company which would need to do the suing itself - by doing business in the US in that manner that would leave it open to the US tax system

    2. Re:This is poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monster likely holds the legal rights and their IPCo holds the beneficial rights; in that case there is no bar to the US Co suing for infringement. A former litigator should recognize the distinction, and the fact that he didn't makes me wonder about the rest of his claims.

    3. Re:This is poetry by jonabbey · · Score: 1

      He didn't specifically allege that Monster US didn't have standing to bring suit in relation to the patents, he merely pointed out that he would be making a lot of noise about Monster's corporate structure, and should there be anything amiss in that area, he'd be sure to bring it to the judge's attention.

  21. Wow by Piazzola · · Score: 1

    That letter is a thing of legalistic beauty. I wanted to cheer when I read it.

    Sometimes, only sometimes, lawyers can be pretty damned awesome.

    1. Re:Wow by edremy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I used to hate all lawyers all the time, then I ran into a mortgage company that tried to screw me out of my house two days before settlement. I spoke with a lawyer for a bit, got some exact words to tell them along with some very specific legal threats, then called the company back.

      The 5 seconds of silence on the other end of the line before the "Uuuh, I think I need to talk to my supervisor" was classic. Took them only a few more minutes before all those horrible problems with my mortgage just vanished.

      Since then I've been a lot more accepting of lawyers- calling down the legal napalm on those assholes was one of the most fun things I've ever done.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    2. Re:Wow by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      They are useful sometimes. I had a company threaten me with court action within 7 days for a debt I apprently owed 5 years previously (and to this day have no idea what they're talking about.. the threatening company was just some random agency I think). 10 minutes with a lawyer and I was able to send a letter back demanding written proof of the outstanding debt (which I expect they did not have), and words to the effect 'Any further letters on the matter to you will be billed at my standard rate of £150/hour' (which was in fact my contract rate at the time).

      They replied with a profuse apology!

    3. Re:Wow by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider legal insurance. I pay about 6 euros per month for it, and with that I can access a hotline which gives immediate access to one of the insurance's lawyers specialized in the covered area. They will first help you solve the matter the cheapest way, without going to court (e.g. by writing a letter or giving advice like the parent poster had). This already saves you a lot of time and money and stress. And if it would go to court, the insurance fee will pay itself back in no time.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  22. Uhm.... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't the RCA connector patented by.... oh, I don't know.... RCA?

    1. Re:Uhm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well connectors are a funny thing. You can patent every variation you can think of down to the millimeter. It is basically a form patent. The connector world is FULL of this sort of junk. Some of these connectors can get rather specialized. So if you can eleminate 1 or 2 people who also make something like what you do, you can quite litterly corrner the market.

      So even though you have an RCA connector. You can have thousands of different 'styles' that are all patented.

      But when it comes down to it. It is still an RCA connector.

    2. Re:Uhm.... by Detritus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any patents held by RCA would have expired many decades ago. They invented the connector in the 1930s.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Uhm.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That's sort of my point.

    4. Re:Uhm.... by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      It probably was, but that design's at least 60 years old now. That hasn't stopped everyone from trying to patent every dumb variation on it that you can think of.

      (Yeah, I know you were joking, sorry.)

    5. Re:Uhm.... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the RCA connector patented by.... oh, I don't know.... RCA?

      RCA presumably had the original utility patent (long since expired), but the patents in this case are design patents. It would also be possible get a utility patent on novel aspects of an RCA connector (a completely new kind of wire termination, say), though I find it hard to imagine a case where something like that would apply specifically to RCA connectors.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  23. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Informative

    read every word of that rather long article, and all I have to say is "OWNED". Wow. Normally I refer from such Internet slang,

    I believe the proper iSlang is PWNED!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  24. Just a friendly correction, not trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled "PWN3T"

    Alternative acceptable spellings include "PWN37," "pVVn3D," "pwnt," and "9W|V3D," though "OWNED" is flat out incorrect.

  25. Monster Clowns by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Monster Cable are the clowns who convince clueless morons that their $150 HDMI cables provide better pictures to your big screen than ordinary HDMI cables.

    Hey, It's Digital, Clowns! It either works, or it doesn't. It doesn't work halfway.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Monster Clowns by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Libs vote for candidates who make them feel good. Consrvs vote for candidates who will solve problems we face. You misspelled excerbate.
    2. Re:Monster Clowns by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Even with a digital signal, a cable can create problems. The "digital" signal has to be made into an analog signal, and then converted back on the other end. Or does DSL, since it is "digital", work over any phone lines without regard to length of the cable?

      Like in a PATA cable, or any parallel cable, if the wires between the parallel bits aren't the same length, you will get clock skew.

      And then there is interference, and intermittent errors, where a marginal cable will work some of the time.

      All of that said, for HDMI over short runs, even most of the cheap $5 cables are "good enough" to not have many signal errors.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:Monster Clowns by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      You misspelled exacerbate.

    4. Re:Monster Clowns by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Libs vote for candidates who make them feel good. Consrvs vote for candidates who will solve problems we face.
      Obviously, conservatives do not consider the gigantic balloning trade deficit and debt problems... (and liberals are hardly to blame for that, since it conservative had unshared power for many years)
    5. Re:Monster Clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did you.

    6. Re:Monster Clowns by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Not the same thing at all.

      DSL is a modulated signal. It's sharing space with voice, and goes across cable paths with hundreds of cables all bound together. It manages to do this reasonably well over a distance of several miles.

      Sending raw voltage down a cable is a completely different thing... plus HDMI is a twisted pair serial link (so your comparison with PATA is completely bogus). Compare it to network cable if you must - you can send that over large distances (50m+) with zero data loss at gigabit speeds (although it's recommended to go much shorter just checkout the cabling in the average office building.. repeaters cost money :p).

      Clock skew is not an issue. That's just something that people like Monster throw in to confuse the issue. It's reclocked at the receiver. If that process failed you'd get no picture *at all* not merely a poor one.

      Interference is not an issue. It's twisted pair - so it'll take a *hell* of a lot of interference for it to bury the signal completely (like wrapping it around a mains transformer or something.. not even sure that would do it).

      HDMI (and most digital) cables are designed so they work 100% until they fail catastrophically. That's the fact of the matter. A $5 cable is not just 'good enough' it's perfect over less than 5m, or it's broken and won't work at all.

    7. Re:Monster Clowns by corsec67 · · Score: 1
      Whoops, I did forget the whole twisted wire versus not twisted wire thing.

      HDMI (and most digital) cables are designed so they work 100% until they fail catastrophically. That's the fact of the matter. A $5 cable is not just 'good enough' it's perfect over less than 5m, or it's broken and won't work at all.

      Yep, for less than "really long" runs, the $5 cable works just fine. (That is what I meant by "good enough". It is good enough for almost all uses.)
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  26. I'll be sure to .. by mbaGeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... buy all of my overpriced cables at Blue Jeans Cable from now on (obviously I'm not a customer of either company)

    This is also a great piece of guerrilla marketing - maybe they are well known in their field but I had never heard of Blue Jeans Cables before today ...

    --
    It ain't what they call you. It's what you answer to. http://mylyceum.us/
    1. Re:I'll be sure to .. by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Their prices on long lengths of HDMI cables are actually downright reasonable. $38 for 24 gague, 50-feet in your choice of color and connector? That's better than Monoprice...

    2. Re:I'll be sure to .. by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Blue Jeans definitely is well known in the "rational high-end audio" field. They're notorious in the "irrational high-end magic audio" field, as well, which I consider a plus for them.

      Their cables are overpriced for the signal they have to carry, but that's because they're overengineered for the signal they have to carry. What you're paying for with them is (a) cable costs, plus (b) terminator costs, plus (c) modest assembly costs.

      Do you need cables that extravagant? Absolutely not. However, if you want some well-engineered and well-built cables, BJ is a bargain.

      (personal note: I make all of my own cables; interconnects out of RG6 coax, and speaker out of multiple 18 ga. stranded runs, braided together a la Kimber Cable, to accomplish ~11 ga. Why? Because I feel like it.)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    3. Re:I'll be sure to .. by scatters · · Score: 1

      I've bought all of my cables from Blue Jeans recently. Their pricing is good, quality is exceptional and the since I live in the Seattle area, I normally get my order delivered next day at normal ground shipping rates. There are only a few companies with whom I have been 100% happy and BJC is one of them.

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    4. Re:I'll be sure to .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their prices on long lengths of HDMI cables are actually downright reasonable. $38 for 24 gague, 50-feet in your choice of color and connector? That's better than Monoprice... Nope, Monoprice is still cheaper:
      http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=102&cp_id=10240&cs_id=1024005&p_id=2110&seq=1&format=2
  27. Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amusingly, for many years Monster stayed away from the types of cables where quality matters, like VGA cables. VGA cables have a high-bandwidth analog signal, and long (10m or so) VGA cables have transmission-line type problems, where mismatches or crosstalk result in ghosting or blur at the monitor. For short tables, it's not a big deal, but as length increases, it matters. There are lots of crap VGA cables out there. Still, above $15 for 10m, you're overpaying.

    HDMI cables have to carry 340MHz, so they're transmission lines. There's a certification process, and if the cable passed it, it should be OK. There are phony HDMI cables out there that don't pass the spec, but all certified cables should work equally well.

    There's something to be said for gold-plated connectors, especially for something that's frequently unplugged, but the cost of the gold is trivial.

    1. Re:Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually high end cables dont have gold but nickel.

      Gold plated ends are a sham, the gold wears through so fast (because it's barely plated on to begin with) it's not funny and the brass underneath it looks like gold so you dont know. The real high end stuff are solid nickel connections.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1
      Just wondering, why nickel? I mean, this strikes me as funny since ISA and PCI cards (and whatever existed before I was born) have been gold plated forever.

      You'd think that if nickel cost less (I have no idea, and I'm sure purity matters to an extent) and performs better than gold, an engineer would have said, "Sure, we can pay more to gold plate these suckers... but, personally, I use nickel for my rig at home!" or something to that effect when his coworker drew up the specs eons ago.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://machinedesign.com/BasicsOfDesignEngineeringItem/714/65761/Connectors.aspx is a decent place to start. Gold conducts better than nickel, so if you're not unplugging your cable 20 times a night, it's better. Gold over nickel is common though, so I don't know wtf GP is talking about.

    4. Re:Quality matters for some high-speed cables. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you dont know WTF about anything.

      Nickel conducts good enough, the slight difference that "gold" makes is purely stupid for signals. gold plated connectors are for corrosion only as well as marketing to really stupid people. Switchcraft, the STANDARD for audio connectors has had solid nickel connectors for decades for their high end stuff. In fact where it matters, recording studios and TV studios, Etc... Nickel connections are the standard, Most ENG people will laugh you out of the room if you suggest the low grade "gold" connectors.

      Basically if it has "gold plated" connectors, the cable is 100% crap and you need to avoid it. get the standard brass ones for $1.95 or get the good nickel ones. Typically you pay way more for the Nickel as they are only the pro cables and yes are designed to be plugged and unplugged 10,000 times without wear.

      Gold plated = nothing. get the cheapie brass ones and call it good if you have a typical $30,000 home theater setup. That low grade of gear you cant see anything different between the cheapies given free in the box and the overpriced stuff with marketing and special cloth coverings that make them look more impressive than they really are.

      Gold is more conductive... oh yeah you can hear that difference..... LOL!

  28. Whoah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Further, if any of these patents or trademarks has been licensed to any entity, please provide me with copies of the licensing agreements. I assume that Monster Cable International, Ltd., in Bermuda, listed on these patents, is an IP holding company and that Monster Cable's principal US entity pays licensing fees to the Bermuda corporation in order to shift income out of the United States and thereby avoid paying United States federal income tax on those portions of its income; my request for these licensing agreements is specifically intended to include any licensing agreements, including those with closely related or sham entities, within or without the Monster Cable "family," and without regard to whether those licensing agreements are sham transactions for tax shelter purposes only or whether they are bona fide arm's-length transactions.

  29. Holy cow! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    I clearly haven't been noticing that Monster have been suing people for producing cables with RCA and coax style connectors.

    I mean, how lame is that? Those are standardized connectors, so the idea of suing someone for making cables with similar ends is ludicrous.

    I've always believed the claims that Monster Cables magically make audio sound differently were completely silly. But, this is the first time I've apparently registered the fact that they sue people who make other cables. I really do hope this guy gets to stand up in court and make them look like fools.

    That's just weird.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  30. Great warranty, though... by thegnu · · Score: 1

    You just return your utterly destroyed Monster cable to any participating store, and they replace it for you, free of charge. Which is pretty goddamn awesome.

    I like PlanetWaves cables better, though. I fear the metal Monster plug will damage my equipment. And I think PlanetWaves has a similar warranty.

    But the price, in light of the lifetime warranty, is pretty fair.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
    1. Re:Great warranty, though... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I'd rather but two and still save money.......

      If the price is $20 vs $100, I can make money on the $80 until I need to replace my cable....which I can do up to 5 times....and still come out ahead.

      Layne

    2. Re:Great warranty, though... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      How often are the cables in your AV cabinet damaged to make a lifetime warranty worth it?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    3. Re:Great warranty, though... by torkus · · Score: 1

      Really? I can't think of the last time i thought 'oh darn, i wish this $5 cable was under warranty' because I have 3 or 4 others like it in a box somewhere since they're dirt cheap.

      Let's compare:

      $100 for monster HDMI
      $5 for cheapy HDMI...order 20 = $100

      Replace it every 3 months and my "cable" lasts 5 years for $100 or $20 per year. (Mind you, if you're wearing out cables like that go buy industrial. For normal "static" use a cable will rarely, if ever, fail.)

      Now lets say the monster cable is 400% better and lasts a year. Free replacement but you have either shipping (+ time involved) or going back to the store (gas + time). Even ignoring "free" replacement costs your mimimum break-even is 5 years. I'm pretty sure i'll replace my TV before then anyhow and want to go for a newer standard interconnect.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    4. Re:Great warranty, though... by thegnu · · Score: 1

      right after I posted this, I realized everyone was talking about the HDMI cables and the lying about the quality and all that.

      I was talking about instrument cables. Which, it's $10-15 for a piece of shit to mediocre cable, and $30 for a monster (which are pretty well-constructed)

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    5. Re:Great warranty, though... by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

      You just return your utterly destroyed Monster cable to any participating store, and they replace it for you, free of charge. Which is pretty goddamn awesome.

      I can buy 10+ HDMI cables for the price of the Monster cable. My cables aren't "utterly destroyed" very often.

  31. Porcupine by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like a porcupine, and boy does it growl like a porcupine. Monster Cable Products Inc, would you like to try a bite and see if it tastes like a porcupine?

    1. Re:Porcupine by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Shhhh, let them bite! They still think he's a duck.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  32. Calling the bluff by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company has received warnings letters about possible patent infringements on our part. As manager of R&D, I've helped respond to them.

    The main thing to keep in mind is that such patent infringement claims are mostly bluff. Sending a letter to a company claiming patent infringement is a relatively cheap thing to do, and might result in a competitor discontinuing a product or paying a license fee. But responding to such a letter in a coherent, technically competent, and determined manner is often enough for the patent holder to back off. They don't want a legal battle any more than you do.

    Indeed, if you can make a case for prior art then the patent holders will really want to avoid a fight, for such a battle might invalidate their patent.

  33. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a beautifully put, long winded way to say "suck my balls"

  34. Cables by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Monster cables are nonsense. If you don't mind paying for them because they are right there and look good, have at it. If your money is worth something to you, buy something else.

    Go to a hardware store and buy 10 gauge stranded wire for your speakers, go to a discount store to by cheap audio/video cables for your VCR (with white/red/yellow RCA connector hoods and coaxial cable), and buy HDMI cables on-line for $4.99.

    Digital signals like HDMI either work or they don't, so as long as it works, you are fine. The speaker wire is far more than enough. And the cheap w/r/y a/v cables from walmart are just fine for the signals they are carrying from a VCR or DVD player.

    Monster cables are a rip-off, there is absolutely no factual quantitative reason to pay for them. The do not perform better, and seriously, CAN'T perform any better then generic cables on consumer electronics. When properly connected, the electrical signals levels are pretty immune to noise. Did you ever wonder why VCRs and DVD players always came with cheap wires? Because the OEMs know that it doesn't make a difference.

    In the case of speaker wires, does anyone know how much energy has to be induced on a speaker wire to actually produce audible noise through a speaker? Its HUGE! Measured in WATTS!

    Monster Cables? give me a break.

  35. its opened now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, thats like the biggest can of whoop ass EVER!!

  36. Expired patent by esocid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm surprised no one spotted his reference to an expired patent that Monster has probably used to threaten other companies.

    Also, please provide me all of the information referenced above as it relates to your expired patent D323643, a copy of which I am attaching. I will need to know what products Monster now offers or at any time has offered for sale which were believed to fall within the scope of D323643, and what claims, if any, of infringement of D323643 were made against others by Monster, whether those claims of infringement took the form of correspondence only, litigation, or otherwise.
    He's pretty much saying did you use this to extort anyone else? If so you will need to return the monies you extorted. Thanks!
    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Expired patent by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he's saying "D323643 is in the public domain. If my connector is closer to D323643 than it is to the five current patents you sent me, then I'm not infringing against the five, I'm infringing -- by which I obviously mean not infringing -- on a public domain design. Send me claims from when D323643 was valid; that will help me prove the similarity."

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  37. Looking for a job? by sherpajohn · · Score: 5, Funny
    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
  38. I want to have Kurt Denke's baby! by moej0j0j0 · · Score: 1

    I read the entire letter and all I can say is wow! Monster is going to be licking it's wounds for a while from that one.

  39. Good cheap cables... by xTK-421x · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just in case anyone doesn't know of them, Monoprice has been my cabling place for years. Good prices, reasonable shipping.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    1. Re:Good cheap cables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded.

    2. Re:Good cheap cables... by n0dna · · Score: 1

      I would have liked to have know about monoprice sooner...

      I just switched over to http://bluejeanscable.com/ not 15 minutes ago. :)

    3. Re:Good cheap cables... by fineous+fingers · · Score: 1

      I second Monoprice's awesomness! They have great prices and super quick shipping to my APO address. I liked them so much I started ordering all of my patch cables for work from them as well.

  40. Lowtax by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    I can't help but be reminded of the various legal threats towards Lowtax at Something Awful and his hilarious responses.

    1. Re:Lowtax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant help but be reminded how all of the accounts on the somethingawful forums were compromised due to an easily preventable SQL injection bug and Lowtax through a hissy fit and left after his loyal goons called him out about it.

    2. Re:Lowtax by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      I cant help but be reminded how all of the accounts on the somethingawful forums were compromised due to an easily preventable SQL injection bug and Lowtax through a hissy fit and left after his loyal goons called him out about it. I can't help but be reminded of the severe douchery some slashdotters possess and how they like to jump on any chance to point out the flaws of others, regardless of how irrelevant it may be, in a desperate attempt to feel better about themselves.
    3. Re:Lowtax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't help but be reminded of doing your mom.

  41. So what are you trying to say? by thenonoman · · Score: 1

    This letter is way beyond awesome.

  42. Same sh*t, different company by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my opinion, Monster cable has been taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge of the general public to convince people to buy EXTREMELY expensive cables, when much cheaper cables would provide equal performance.

    Bose has been doing this for years as well. It's amazing to me the chasm between the home users who buy the stuff and the true audiophiles and sound engineers who won't touch it. In the long run, I suppose it is all subjective - if it sounds good to you, then your money is well spent. I just take issue with companies using suspicious claims to support their "innovative" technology.
    1. Re:Same sh*t, different company by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      No highs, no lows. Must be Bose.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  43. Dallas Caley by Dallas+Caley · · Score: 1

    Anyone who's not an idiot realises the lack of value with monster cables. and its a friggin RCA cord for god sakes, they're all pretty much the same. what a bunch of duchbags

  44. He's just rambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Monster provided him with enough information (i.e., a reference to a patent, a reference to a trademark, and a reference to one of his products) for him to determine if he is in fact violating their rights. He responds by asking for a bunch of things they have no need and/or no ability to provide him at this stage (e.g., a list of their own products made that use a design patent's features, an exact legal description of what exact parts of his product infringe, etc.)

    Many comments have heralded him as a hero for calling out some inadequacy in the Monster letter, but in reality, the information he has is enough for a skilled lawyer to determine if he is likely to be infringing any rights that Monster has. All of the design information about his cables and logos should be known to him or other people in his company, and all of the patent information and trademark information (including the correspondences he requested) is available for him and all of the public to view in high quality. Before discovery has taken place, he is in a much better position to make an argument that his products don't infringe than Monster is in to make an argument that his products do infringe because he knows more about his own products than they do and all of Monster's legal claims are rooted in patents/trademarks that are publicly available. The fact that he doesn't know how to find the public information indicates that being whatever type of lawyer he once was does not amount to sufficient qualifications to defend himself against this potential lawsuit.

    He has not provided any legally sufficient grounds to rebut anything Monster said. He will probably antagonize them by requesting ridiculous things from their already busy employees when he should be getting those things himself. He will probably give them added confidence by responding in a way that shows both his ignorance of the subject matter and his overconfidence/willingness to fight back without proper legal council. I expect this not to be pretty for him in the future and hope others talk to a skilled IP lawyer before trying something like this.

    1. Re:He's just rambling by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      so if I designed and built a car that looked like a porsche, sounded like a porsche, went off the line like a porsche, topped like a porsche but cost 1/5 the amount, would I not expect to be sued by Porsche? Of course I would. If my car performed like a porsche but looked like a matchbox, the worst I could expect is a letter from Swan Vesta offering to subsidise a world wide tour.

      If I designed a 13 amp UK plug, would I expect to be sued by MK or Crabtree?

      Hell no. A porsche is a design on form. A 13 amp plug is a design on function. The patent on functional design on the plug is long expired, which is why several companies now make 13 amp plugs. Only Porsche build porsches, they own the form design patent which holds for as long as they build according to that patent plus a few.

      The guy isn't rambling, he's asking for information he hasn't been able to find pertinent to their claim, which is required if he is to either settle or fight. USPTO documents are freely available from the USPTO at nominal cost, there for all to see. If said documents are unclear as to their form then Monster has either no claim on Blue Jeans or they have a broad claim which affects the entire audio/video industry. This is just Monster flexing its legal muscle, and for once meeting resistance. Just sit back, suck on a coke and enjoy the show.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    2. Re:He's just rambling by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      It was my understanding that monster was referring not to the functional design of the RCA standard cable/terminations, but the design of the rubber/plastic termination moldings. I haven't seen Blue Jeans' cable terminations, but monster _could_ have a case here if the rubber moldings were very similar.

      I'm not taking sides here, I'm just clarifying. Monster's case would be like Coca Cola going after some bottle maker for making a bottle in that special (trademarked) hourglass shape; that is different from Coca Cola going after a bottle maker for making generic bottles.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    3. Re:He's just rambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Posting as AC because I've moderated.

      You have missed the point of

      As for your requests for information, or for action, directed to me: I would remind you that it is you, not I, who are making claims; and it is you, not I, who must substantiate those claims. You have not done so.

      He could do the legwork if he wanted to.
      He's saying he's going to make them do it.
      It would not be a good idea to try to bluff your way through a situation like this.
      He's not bluffing.
    4. Re:He's just rambling by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      I think he covered that in his letter. Monster is claiming trade-dress infringement, ie. infringement on distinctive appearance and markings. Based on what he says, Monster a) sent images of the appearances allegedly infringed upon that're so small and indistinct that you can't reliably see what they look like to compare it to eh allegedly-infringing items, and b) to the extent that the multiple items Monster submitted can be discerned, they're so radically different that no single item could possibly be similar to all of them at once as Monster seems to be claiming. And his response seems equally reasonable: Monster should send him either actual samples or clear, large images of the Monster cables of the designs they claim are infringed upon, and should identify the exact Blue Jeans products which they believe are unacceptably similar to each of their samples. If Monster can't do that, they deserve to get smacked around by a judge if they take it to court.

    5. Re:He's just rambling by nuzak · · Score: 1

      The moldings on Monster cables have a very distinct look (they have a little badge on them with the Monster logo for one) and from the pictures I've seen of the Blue Jeans cables, they look not a bit alike.

      This guy's written a template reply for anyone who gets a letter from Monster. Bravo.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:He's just rambling by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      He will probably antagonize them by requesting ridiculous things from their already busy employees when he should be getting those things himself.

      I hate to point out the obvious, but that's half the point. The more he makes Monsters' lawyers work, the less they want to bother harassing him.

      My understanding is that this sort of thing is common practice.

  45. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

    I believe the proper iSlang is PWNED!
    Or "pwn3d". I've been wondering for years, is that supposed to be pronounced "owned" or "pawned"?

  46. hindsight is 20/20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I really wish I knew about this crap a few years ago when I bought my car stereo. I'm starting to have a feeling the shop had normal wiring that would have sounded identical for a tenth of the price. I spent $100 and about a month with the shop trying to fix a problem. They even sent my amp in to the manufacturer to check it out. The sent it back as "fixed" with no other info and charged me $100. Problem still occurred. So I get fed up after a while and check everything I can think of, every connection and wire. Low and behold, the Monster cable was the issue with a faulty cap that would cut out the signal if it was pushed in all the way. What a joke...

  47. having just read TFA... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    I have to say, that is the best piece of legalesed "kiss my arse" I've read in a very long time. Saved for future reference under "Trademark infringement reply form" should it ever become necessary.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  48. So tired of their products by darkfnord23 · · Score: 1

    Monster Cables are always recommended by the longhairs in Guitar Center and other music stores. Those dudes get really confused when I say I never buy Monster. Worst Instrument Cables Ever. They're so noisy, tangle easily, crappy frequency response. And did I mention they're noisy? By this I mean you plug in your guitar and when you move around the electrical capacitance (or whatever, I'm no engineer) of the cable turns it into one giant contact mic. Terrible. I hope people will wake up and realize that these products suck.

  49. Monster & Scientology? by treval · · Score: 1

    I RTFA too despite this being contrary to normal /. SOP. He certainly has a way with words and I am impressed with the way he demolished every point they made. It's almost a pity that he is no longer a lawyer.

    At the end, my only conclusion is that Monster is to speaker cables what Scientology is to well, anything...

    --
    Your attitude is infectious...
    1. Re:Monster & Scientology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end, my only conclusion is that Monster is to speaker cables what Scientology is to well, anything...

      And those silver speaker cables are to cables what Jonestown was to cults?

    2. Re:Monster & Scientology? by dwater · · Score: 1

      It's almost a pity that he is no longer a lawyer. I thought that too.

      While reading the letter, I was confused. It seems like he wanted it to go to trial/court/whatever, but he does such a good job of rebuttal, that it would almost certainly never happen.

      Does he want them to go forward with this or not?
      --
      Max.
  50. That's quite an act. What do you call it? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    That's hardly what I would call a reliable source of information, and yet people continue to perpetuate the mean as truth because it appeals to their pre-existing notions.

    Wikipedia!

  51. Blue Jeans are Great cables by BoydWaters · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I've got some high-end Monster cables for speaker cables and some Blue Jeans cables for interconnect. The Blue Jeans cables are great. (Good audio cables isn't hard, just use some nice co-ax.)

    1. Re:Blue Jeans are Great cables by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. Can you clarify what you meant by using coax as audio cable? I'm picturing 80 ohm coax in my head, and I can't imagine that the central conductor would handle any major current. No offense, but are you maybe thinking instead about regular paired stranded wire?

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    2. Re:Blue Jeans are Great cables by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy 80 ohm coax? I've heard of 75Ohm, but not 80.

    3. Re:Blue Jeans are Great cables by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>Where do you buy 80 ohm coax? I've heard of 75Ohm, but not 80.

      http://www.electrospec.com/alpha/product_detail.asp?item=9840+BK001

      http://www.meci.com/product_info.php/products_id/6302327?osCsid=9575d379ece2e7a4a29cd750b9338529

      I did mean to say 75 ohm, but I've been working on an 80 ohm dipole antenna lately, so my numbers were mixed up.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  52. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

    I belive that "iSlang" is not the word used for Internet Slang. Ever. In any situation. Maybe by people who still call the internet "Cyberspace".

  53. blue jeans, good company - by mrcubehead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've bought cables from them before, they always struck me as the perfect antidote to the snake oil industry. This only increases my respect for an already respectable company.

  54. This guy is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope Monster is foolish enough to go forward, I would love to see them taken off of the $100 cable for the masses pedestal they've placed themselves on; the specific RCA connectors they appear to be claiming are single use pieces of crap, they work great but I've destroyed several in the attempt to get them off of the equipment on which they're used. This guy should take offense at the comparison. After reading the letter I find myself reminded of an Eddie Murphy skit where he dresses up as a white guy...... priceless.

  55. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by icebrain · · Score: 1

    I've always heard it as "powned"

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  56. Buy his cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if he's everyone's hero, then go to his website and start buying his cables! Support this guy!

  57. Not that i would buy monster cables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but i bought a hdmi cable that was poorly shielded and killed my ps3's wifi, sad thing was that it was not even that cheap.

  58. It all boils down to... by sco_robinso · · Score: 1

    Length of the run... For 95% of consumers who have their components sitting 5-10 feet away from each other, monster is useless. Test after test has shown that in distances less that about 20 feet, there is no difference.

  59. My new Hero....Monster BitchSlapper by UttBuggly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I loved every word Mr. Denke wrote...freakin' brilliant. Kudos to him for fighting back.

    Two things. I've had some high-powered lawyers across the table from me on 3 occasions and so far, I'm 3-0. There IS an assumption these big firms make along the lines of threaten and terrify people until they give it up. Sadly, that works pretty well...until someone like Mr. Denke comes along and says "wait just a damn minute!"

    In my most "fun" case, I leased a new Jeep Cherokee for business use in 1984. I had it for exactly 35 days, several of which the Jeep spent in the dealer's service department. The thing was a TOTAL lemon. The first time I tapped the horn, the entire button, retaining ring, and spring flew off. The first cassette I popped into the "premium" audio system was eaten so badly the unit broke. Rear window defroster...no electrical connection. And so on. On day 35, I picked the Jeep for the 4th or 5th time...in a month...and discovered they hadn't fixed the latest problem, just ordered parts, and I was to "call every few days to see if the parts have arrived". I walked into the Leasing Manager's office, handed him the keys, notified him I was surrendering the vehicle under the terms and conditions of the lease in the Section for Early Lease Termination. I agreed to pay $900 to get out of the lease as the agreement stated a 6% charge on a 1st year termination. OK, $15,000 Jeep....that's $900. I walked out, got a cab, and bought a Nissan truck the next day.

    A few weeks later, I get served. The leasing company WHOLESALED a new Jeep that had 400 miles of driving on it for $9500 and presented me with the difference...about $6000. And placed an entry with the credit bureaus that I had "defaulted" on a loan. I countersued the dealership, their employee, and the leasing company. We went to deposition...myself and my small-town lawyer...and sat down with about 15 people from the other side. Other than myself and the lady typing, it was all lawyers. The lead guy, "Rudy", did everything but punch me. I smiled, we presented our evidence, and left. In the hall, the dealership lawyers offered to pay the leasing company themselves if I would drop the countersuit against them. In the end, I paid them nothing. They even paid MY attorney. I still smile every day or so about that one.

    2nd thing: Monster cables are NOT very good. I have an extensive background in electronics and have made thousands of cables of every description. I also play bass in a working band and run 3 basses during a big show. I tried a Monster Instrument Cable...at a premium price...and found it to be trash. A handmade "Radio Shack" special worked as well. I now use Planet Waves cutout cables and have never had a problem. In the studio, I'm going straight to the board and listening to the mix with Sennheiser phones and the PW cables sound as good as anything I've made or used. And before the "audiophiles" jump in with the "warm" and "bright" crap, MY former life was as an engineer for a major A/V firm that does work from coast-to-coast. Wire is wire. 12 gauge copper wire in bulk from the hardware store is just as good as the horrendously more expensive Monster Cable stuff. I only use the PW cables for my basses because of the cutout switch makes instrument changes on stage a QUIET snap and I'm too lazy to build my own....yet.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
    1. Re:My new Hero....Monster BitchSlapper by clarkcox3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      To really experience the Monster advantage, you have to run a green magic marker along the wire. I've got one I'll sell for $350 + s/h :)

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    2. Re:My new Hero....Monster BitchSlapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. Monster cables are poor quality. I think the right phrase is "Mutton dressed up as lamb." I only ever bought one monster cable and it fell apart because, the RCA connector was gold plated brittle pot metal. They are junk Chinese goods. I have had Blue Jeans make my a lot of cabling for my studio. It is made from American Belden cable and is superb and delivered at a good price.

      The last time I was in BB I needed an optical cable. They only had Monster. I ordered from Blue Jeans and got a better cable at a third of the price, including delivery.

      Monster cable have full house of everything currently wrong with corporate America.

    3. Re:My new Hero....Monster BitchSlapper by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Lawyers are very good at intimidation. The system pretty much rewards it. After all, if you can threaten/berate/harass someone out of standing up to you and your client, you've just saved yourself a buttload of time and earned quite a bit of money. So I don't blame them for trying. Imagine if everything about your job was to fuck someone else out of something, or defend someone against being fucked out of something. Also, just the title of lawyer is enough to make people sweat a little bit.

      Case-in-Point: Years and years ago I was driving in my '98 Cavalier. A large dumptruck cuts me off and slows down. I was already pissed off, and then a chunk of broken concrete somehow rattled out of the back, onto the interstate, and was kicked up by their tire. It busted my windshield, leaving a nice apocolyptic-butterfly (for lack of better description) shatter mark covering most of my windshield. I got a picture of the truck, the concrete still in the window, and everything I could think of.

      When I called the company to ask them to repair it, they said they weren't going to under any circumstances because I shouldn't have been driving behind said truck. They said it wasn't their problem at all. I called the next day with the same response.

      On the third day, I called a law office who had been advertised in the phone book. They asked if I had evidence, and were pretty shocked that I did. They agreed to contact the place and ask nicely for a resolution. Merely hours later, the vice president of the company calls and asks me to fax him a copy of the bill and says I'll get a check in the mail in a few days.

      I called the lawyer back and he did it because he didn't think they'd cave so fast, but that if they took it to court I had a pretty damn good chance of winning. All he did was bark out some rules on how the judge would see their neglect for not having the required flaps behind their tires, and for having most identifying information/phone numbers scratched off. When he told them I had pictures of the truck right after, with chunk-o-concrete still lodged in my windshield, they caved.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  60. And for those who did not read the whole thing: by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

    I say this because my observation has been that Monster Cable typically operates in a hit-and-run fashion. Your client threatens litigation, expecting the victim to panic and plead for mercy; and what follows is a quickie negotiation session that ends with payment and a licensing agreement. Your client then uses this collection of licensing agreements to convince others under similar threat to accede to its demands. Let me be clear about this: there are only two ways for you to get anything out of me. You will either need to (1) convince me that I have infringed, or (2) obtain a final judgment to that effect from a court of competent jurisdiction. It may be that my inability to see the pragmatic value of settling frivolous claims is a deep character flaw, and I am sure a few of the insurance carriers for whom I have done work have seen it that way; but it is how I have done business for the last quarter-century and you are not going to change my mind. If you sue me, the case will go to judgment, and I will hold the court's attention upon the merits of your claims--or, to speak more precisely, the absence of merit from your claims--from start to finish. Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it. I just love this. Especially the bolded part.
  61. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by operagost · · Score: 1

    "pooned"

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  62. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by sbate · · Score: 1

    Leo Laport says powned like owned with a p in front. p-owned. It sounds gay though, in a bad way not in a rainbow covered belt way. owned is better.

    --
    Added Pressly: "Oh, and by the way, milk is nothing but liquid meat."
  63. Yes, yes Monster was pwned, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why is a guy as smart as Denke working in such a bullshit marketing, sham-filled sector as high-end audio cables?

    1. Re:Yes, yes Monster was pwned, but... by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 1

      Why is a guy as smart as Denke working in such a bullshit marketing, sham-filled sector as high-end audio cables? If you actually look at the bluejeanscable.com website, you'll realize that Kurt is NOT a bullshit salesman like these other A/V cable companies are. You'll only find real specs and no psuedo-scientific snake-oil about what cable can or can't do.
  64. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by RingDev · · Score: 1

    Damn you kids and your lingo!

    GET OFF MY INFORMATION SUPER HIGHWAY!

    -Rick

    To the filter: Yes, using so many caps is like yelling, because I am. When was the last time you heard an elderly gentleman say "get off my yard" in a civil voice to a bunch of rowdy teenagers?! Is this enough babble to avoid the yelling filter?

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  65. Barely compares to Pear Audio by emkman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Think Monster is expensive?

    http://www.pearcable.com/

    Anjou Speaker Cable
    3 foot pair - $2750
    8 foot pair - $5250
    12 foot pair - $7250

    You can start laughing/crying now.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:Barely compares to Pear Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check this snake oil out, quantum tunneling treatment indeed.

      http://www.synergisticresearch.com/page/cables/interconnects

      Ol' P.T. Barnum would have been amazed...

    2. Re:Barely compares to Pear Audio by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      It's remarkable how people can sell cables on performance merits that far exceed the performance of any known form of audio recording, let alone any known audio transduction system including all manufactured monitors and human perception.

      Of course, if you dropped $10K on Klipsches, which are themselves quite the boondoggle, "good sound" begins to take on a meaning quite apart from things like equal-loudness contours, effective bit depths and THD+N.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:Barely compares to Pear Audio by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You've got it all wrong. The real question is this: How do I set up shop and start selling cables to rubes?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  66. Italicized text broke my eyes! by Doonga2007 · · Score: 1

    While that was one of the most amusing reads I've had in quite some time, when I came back to read the comments, all of the text looks slanted to the left. Ok fine, they're back to normal now, but it was an interesting sensation for a few minutes there.

  67. Re:This guy is a hero by Beau6183 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. In fact, he is now *my* hero. I was planning on naming my first son (due in June) "Jeffrey" after my deceased brother. However, after reading this letter, I'm now hard pressed to name him "Kurt Denke" in hopes that my degenerate genes he's inheriting would somehow be buffed.

  68. Oh Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I try not to think in "Us vs. Them" terms but that was brutal. And no matter what happens, you can bet your a$$ that the IRS is already looking into this regardless of what happens to Monster vs. Blue Jeans.

  69. RTFA by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I actually RTFA, and I must say without reservation that it is completely and totally worth reading the entire thing.

    --

    Question everything

  70. I know what my first set of HDMI cables will be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what my first set of HDMI cables will be ...
    assuming they are priced competitively and not
    priced like the Bermuda company's ... ;-)

    Clevertwit - not logged in

  71. He should have also... by fitten · · Score: 1

    ...threatened to go into the business of selling clothes hangars real cheap to compete with Monster Cables.

  72. Parry and Thrust by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    I read most of the way through the letter. I'm quite impressed by the guy who wrote this. He does his freaking homework. I love how after spending the first 1/2 of the letter going into some detail about the homework he's done which show's there no possible way his product can be infringing Monster's current patents, he doesn't stop there. He then goes on the attack, bringing up their Bermuda "IP Holding Company" which he posit's they appear to be using as a tax shelter, and how me might blow down their little Bermuda shelter like a hurricane.

    You mess with this guy and he's going to dig up every single skeleton in your closet and use it against you. I'd say this guy has shown he is *not* lazy, and will be *relentless*. Wow.

  73. As much as we by BigJClark · · Score: 1


    As much as we detest lawyers, it isn't bad when you have one on your side, or can learn from one.

    Kudos Kurt!

    --

    Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
  74. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Or "pwn3d" Nah.... 13375p34k is *so* 2004! Actually, I mean that- anyone notice that it's mostly died off now? It went from being everywhere a while back to having almost disappeared within a fairly short period of time.

    I guess it's not surprising that something that reveled in its own obscurity and nicheness lost its appeal when everyone was doing it. On reflection, it's probably *not* a coincidence that it seemed to really die out just around the time that the mainstream press started running articles explaining those strange messages your teenage children were typing. That's so uncool ;-)

    (And my use of smileys is so 1990s too...)
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  75. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    I believe the proper iSlang is PWNED!

    You'll be hearing from Apple's lawyers shortly.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  76. If only the RIAA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would try to sue Mr. Denke.

  77. HDMI cables by acb · · Score: 1

    On a tangent: are HDMI cables just cables with HDMI connectors, or do they have to contain licensed cryptographic DRM processors to account to the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray player for where all those electrons have gone or somesuch? I thought that the increase in cost was due to heavy-handed Hollywood-mandated DRM requirements, and the patent-licensing feast on top of that.

    1. Re:HDMI cables by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      No they're just cables with HDMI connectors.

      Anything sold as an HDMI cable has to meet a basic transmission standard to prove it can handle the maximum bandwidth. All cables on sale do this.. so don't be fooled by this 'HDMI 1.3 cable so it's more expensive' crap. A cable *tested* to HDMI 1.1 standard can more than likely handle HDMI 1.3, it's just nobody has tested it to that standard (90% of cables are tested to 1.3 standard anyway, so you might not need to choose - monoprice cables are fine for example).

    2. Re:HDMI cables by nuzak · · Score: 1

      They're just cables. The DRM is implemented in the endpoints. HDCP is actually fairly lightweight stuff, and one proposed attack on it could probably be programmed into a FPGA. Of course they already know about that and are planning on making all that HDMI stuff obsolete with DisplayPort, which has 128-bit AES encryption built in.

      It's all so absurd though, because no one even wants to get at the raw bitstream. It's way too much data to capture, and aside from the insane amount of CPU power it would require to recompress it, it's already been decoded from a lossy video codec, and recompressing it would introduce all kinds of artifacts, whereas ripping it straight from the source data has no such problem.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  78. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by bishiraver · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, nah. It's "Poned." As in, "Ponied." ...PONIES!!!

  79. I feel so ... dirty. by gosand · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    After reading that, I was completely on his side, then I thought "wait, I am taking the side of one lawyer over another" and I just felt so.... dirty.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:I feel so ... dirty. by jskline · · Score: 1

      (Australian maids person sounding voice)

      Aayhya Mister;

      A simple sponge-bath ought' a clean ya right up there...

      There ya are;

      Fresh as a bloomin' daisy yea are!

      --
      All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  80. My favorite quote by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do not compromise with bullies and I would rather spend fifty thousand dollars on defense than give you a dollar of unmerited settlement funds. As for signing a licensing agreement for intellectual property which I have not infringed: that will not happen, under any circumstances, whether it makes economic sense or not.

    Bravo. Just fucking bravo.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:My favorite quote by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Bravo. Just fucking bravo.

      Kipling would be proud.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:My favorite quote by dwater · · Score: 1

      That statement made me wonder if Blue Jeans is a public company, or a private one - I have to assume the latter, else it would seem he's opened himself up to share holder action.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:My favorite quote by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if Blue Jeans is public, if the shareholders have any brains, they'll support his stance. This isn't just a matter of principle (although it is certainly that) but also a matter of cold hard cash. Blue Jeans will in every way do better by standing up to the aptly-named Monster than they would be settling.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:My favorite quote by dwater · · Score: 1

      > if the shareholders have any brains

      Need I say more?

      Well, I will anyway....if the litigation costs the company so much that it goes 'bust', then that is a problem that the share holders might well be interested in, I think.

      --
      Max.
    5. Re:My favorite quote by morganew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, dwater makes a good point. One of our member companies had a General Counsel who was of the same mindset as Mr. Denke; he wanted to fight weak infringement claims. Unfortunately, as an officer of the company, he was required to lay out the costs for fighting and winning and the costs of just settling. Oftentimes even WINNING could be more expensive than settling if the claimant had no real assets. And then there was the risk of losing.

      So in the end, he had to settle cases he desperately wanted to fight. He was a big part of the reason we got involved in patent reform several years ago.

      Morgan

      --
      A sig?!? I don't think so.....
    6. Re:My favorite quote by braindump · · Score: 1

      I'd say that it makes no difference.

      If it's a private company, he's defending the interests of the principals.

      If it's a public company, he's (rather effectively) defending the interests of his shareholders. A CEO's job is to build shareholder value. It could be inferred that that description would include taking action to prevent loss of value.

      Either way - BRAVO!!

      --
      Ah, fuck it
    7. Re:My favorite quote by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      You need to consider the real cost associated which showing every potential unmerited claimant that you'll pay them off, even "cheaply", rather than fight.

      A reputation for fighting fraudulent claims (and winning), has to scare those that would try to extort from you.

    8. Re:My favorite quote by sjames · · Score: 1

      That statement made me wonder if Blue Jeans is a public company, or a private one - I have to assume the latter, else it would seem he's opened himself up to share holder action.

      How so? Thus far, all he has done is a best effort (and a fine effort it is) to avoid a shakedown.

      If and when he actually chooses to go to court rather than pay tribute to the would-be king, he would only be open to shareholder action if it's clear he is costing more money than he will potentially save (keeping in mind that if his company gets a rep as an easy mark for legal shakedowns, others will line up behind Monster).

    9. Re:My favorite quote by dwater · · Score: 1

      because he's explicitly said that he will not give up fighting irrespective of whether it makes financial sense or not- it is a personal character issue for him.

      It only makes sense if he is 1) right, 2) successful, and 3) his company survives.

      --
      Max.
    10. Re:My favorite quote by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is no reason for shareholder action (assuming a public company) unless or until Monster doesn't go away and he does reject a settlement, and then only if pressing forward costs more than looking like an easy mark for a shakedown does.

      Howwever, I can't find any information on stock for the company, so it's likely not public.

    11. Re:My favorite quote by dwater · · Score: 1

      glad you agree with me then

      --
      Max.
  81. Costing them legal fees by currivan · · Score: 1

    I think part of the fun he's having at their expense is that it will cost them literally thousands of dollars just to have their lawyers read and digest that response - which they won't be able to avoid since they already authorized their lawyers to handle the communication with him.

  82. Fine. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just have Kurt write a letter to them too.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  83. Ace170780 by Ace170780 · · Score: 1

    I saw this a few months ago on TV. Can't recall what program it was but they basicaly tested generic cables with the monster ones to see if there was a difference in the quality of the signal. From there testing there was absolutly no difference. That it be gold plated or not absolutly no difference.

    1. Re:Ace170780 by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Not trying to defend Monster, but gold plated contacts are intended to reduce corrosion, so unless the test was conducted over the course of many years or with accelerated corrosion that particular aspect of connector construction wasn't tested. Gold plating of contacts isn't pure snake-oil, though plating with cheaper metals is fine for the majority of applications and may be better, as gold is pretty soft, so the plating wears off easily.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    2. Re:Ace170780 by ^_^x · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've actually had some stainless/chromed cable ends (can't say for sure. Probably just shiny stainless) corrode over time. One headphone plug in particular takes on a thin dark grey coating every couple years of regular use.

      So I take a rag with a little metal polish on it, wipe it off, then clean off the polish. Good as new. I've never had a static connection like one on an amp or piece of home theatre equipment corrode on me.

      So you're absolutely right, and in my experience gold is functional but not useful. My favorite cable sham is people selling high-grade shielded, gold-plated connector cables for a home theatre digital signal. Short of being so bad it drops bits, there would literally be no difference in high and low grade - there's really no wiggle room for looking a little better or worse.

  84. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Maybe by people who still call the internet "Cyberspace".

    InfoBahn?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  85. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    When was the last time you heard an elderly gentleman say "get off my yard" in a civil voice to a bunch of rowdy teenagers?!

    I'd be inclined to do so, but punctuate my civil voice with a few shotgun blasts in their general direction.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  86. filtering not usually needed...get a UPS instead by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    As for filtering, modern home theater equipment is more computer than TV or stereo, and this stuff is VERY sensitive to low quality poewr. A surge protector is WORTHLESS! You need power filtration with real time voltage regulation. Monster does a good job providing very high quality filtering systems for as little as $200-300. If you have high def, a suround sound stereo, a PS3 or xbox360, keep this in mind. 97% of all electronic failure is the result of low or inconsitent power. Surge protectors only stop massive oversurges (typically over 160 volts). Damage to computer electronics cn occur at voltage below 104 or above 116. Do your lights ever flicker in your house? Especially when your AC turns on or when your fridge kicks in? If so, GO BUY A POWER FILTER for every digital device in your house!!! Filtering isn't going to help. You'd need a honkin' big filter to fix flickering lamps or voltage surges/sags. Filters are most often used to keep high frequency noise from getting ON to the power lines.

    I also take issue with your contention that under 104V or over 116 volts will damage a computer. The power supply on my computer states that it operates from 100-240V, 50/60 Hz. If you know how these supplies are designed, you won't be concerned with minor surges and sags...they take the raw AC, full wave rectify and filter it, and use the resulting +300 to +500 DC as the input to a step down (to 3 to 12 volts) switching regulator. Spikes don't make it past the transformer.

    Surges are something else. Multi-cycle overvoltages can affect switching supplies (although this is unlikely in the US, as our 120V is at the low end of the switcher's operating range). The best way to protect against those, and a good investment anyway, is a small UPS from a good, reputable manufacturer. It'll save your data when the line goes out and block any dangerous surges.

    UPSs can be picked up cheap, as most companies ditch them after the batteries die. Spend $25 or $50 on some new cells at Digikey and you have a perfectly good UPS. Ask your company IT people, they'll usually be happy to have you haul them away. Laptop owners already have one...the battery in your computer.

    If your lights are flickering when your fridge kicks on, call an electrician. Your fridge should be on its own dedicated circuit, and if your lights are flickering, it's a sign that there's a high resistance connection between the fridge and your power feed. Get it investigated and fixed! If your AC is dimming your lights, you've may have too much load on that circuit, and you shouldn't be plugging your computer in to that outlet!

    The more you know...
  87. Re:The whole letter by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Informative


    "You are in possession of at least seven orifices. Your website demonstrates fifteen cables, one of which you may discard. If so, the other fourteen are still under the terms of your retributuion. You will now insert those cables into the orifices in the 1-1-1-1-3-1-7 configuration."

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  88. I Just Wish by twmcneil · · Score: 0

    This guy would write to Microsoft concerning their claims of patent and copyright violations.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  89. oh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA: "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

    in other words - Bring it!

  90. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

    I prefer "chowned". :)

    --
    All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
  91. I've used both by kunwon1 · · Score: 1

    Monster makes supposedly 'high quality' A/V cabling, Blue Jean makes custom and non-custom cabling, that happens to actually be high quality, sans quotes.

    --
    Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
  92. Monster is the poster boy for corp greed IMHO by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Monster cables have become the poster boy for corporate greed in my book. Blue Jeans Cable also appears to be seriously overpriced, but that actually makes such a dustup even more entertaining, actually, since I really don't care who wins or loses...

  93. interconnect, not speaker cable by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Actually it would usually be 50 or 75 ohm coax, and it's used for interconnect, not speaker cables, so hardly any current is flowing.

    The nice thing about it is that it's easy to put RCA (or BNC at the high end) connectors on it. No soldering required, and you get really good shielding.

  94. Monster, Blue Jean - what's the difference? by kindbud · · Score: 1, Informative

    High end cables are for e-peen. There is actually no measurable sonic difference between the output of speakers and systems connected with Monster or Blue Jean cables, and garden-variety cables from Radio Shack or any other non-premium cable vendor. In short, premium cables of any brand are basically ripoffs. Buyers pay a large premium solely to feel better about their expensive home theater system. You spent $10,000 on the electronics, a $5 cable seems - unworthy. And yet, every double-blind study and every sonic measurement ever done on this question has shown that not only is there no measurable difference in the final signal, but persons who claim to be able to hear the difference are always shown to be under the influence of wishful thinking. They are no better at fingering the premium cable than a random guesser.

    http://www.joyoftech.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1082.html

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  95. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

    Or "pwn3d". I've been wondering for years, is that supposed to be pronounced "owned" or "pawned"?

    It's not supposed to be pronounced. Please.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  96. Good show Blue Jean by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    It is pity that other smaller companies don't have this form of defense other than the ACLU. I hope Blue Jean wins this cases and sends a message to other corporate raiders to think before they send legal letters.

    1. Re:Good show Blue Jean by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      There is no case to win. No lawsuit has been filed. The only thing that has happened is that a letter was sent from a Monster attorney to the owner of the company asking that they stop selling a supposedly infringing product. The owner replied with, in very many more words, "Screw you."

  97. i once purchased monster cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of cables, box contained monster. Would buy again A+++.

  98. Go Free Market by Roane · · Score: 1

    Entertaining enough to justify a purchase. I'd been putting off getting HDMI cables for my projector for a while anyhow. http://www.bluejeanscable.com/store/

  99. FYI - it's Tartan Cable, NOT Blue Jeans... by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although Kurt is the owner of Blue Jeans Cable, I need to remind some of you that Monster is coming after Tartan Cable (which is also owned by Kurt). Tartan cable is Kurt's economy line of cables... it's all "Made in China", it's inexpensive, and by all standards, just as good as any of the other stuff bought at Best Buy or Circuit City - just less money. Blue Jeans Cable sells what is known as broadcast quality cabling. Basically, it's the same stuff you'll find being used by professional broadcast engineers in television studios, radio stations, A/V post production houses, and the like. Yes, it's more expensive than the chinese stuff, but it is mostly Belden Cable and anyone who knows about this stuff will see the value. Yes, for the most part, a lot of what Blue Jeans sells may be considered "overkill" for your run of the mill home theater - that is why the Tartan line of products was introduced. But for those who want what the pros use, Blue Jeans will deliver and not suck your wallet dry in the process.

  100. Resisted the /. effect? by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks to me like these guys either stripped their website down to the barest of bare bones to survive what must be DDoS-level traffic, or they have a really crappy website.

    I'm thinking that those graphics look like they probably fit into a more image-rich site. They've even done away with their style sheet.

    If my guess is right, it shows that these guys are definitely on the ball. Well done! (if not, they really need to do something about that site!)

  101. Paralegal opening at Monster Cables by shninja · · Score: 1

    https://jobs-monstercable.icims.com/monstercable_jobs/jobs/candidate/job.jsp?jobid=1503&mode=view We should all try to apply at least once. Making valid legal arguments apparently is not a job requirement.

  102. Patent trolls the same as spammers? by trawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There appears to be a remarkable resemblance between patent trolls and spammers in that they both appear to like sending things like this out to as many people as they can and just playing the numbers. I'm sure Monster have done this before and either gotten the other entity to just roll over and play dead, but really - they can just spam things like this out to as many people as they want and hope that they can get enough of a percentage of success to make it profitable as its own business process.

    Admittedly its more expensive than the near-zero cost of spam, but the principle is the same.

  103. Dear Noble Warrior! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dear Noble Warrior,
    we here in the Poison Tooth legal division of the Monster company collectively approve of your response and fully appreciate your work ethics and willingness to "pay 50k for a defence ... rather than one dollar in settlement".

    Informally and frankly, many of us at Monster see our professional zest deteriorating and qualification decline when kept on a usual diet of helpless ladies, their clueless bluecollar husbands, widows and orphans too internet-active for their young age.

    We fully share your sentiment and you will be happy to hear that we all agreed to fight.

    Most agile of our colleagues immediately pointed at a flaw in your estimations of the pecuniary and moral effects of the case. Gobbling up one cheeky former lawyer would do to our reputation and intimidation potential wonders; you alone weigh probably between 37 and 83 units (calculated in number of destroyed helpless ladies and young orphans with their future careers clobbered for good by their first criminal record), and we simply cannot miss such a chance.

    We are writing to inform you that, with this unanimous view we at the Poison Tooth subdivision, descended upon one of the hunting lodges rented by Monster for such occasions around the year, and conducted a rather successful brainstorm session.

    The members according to their dispositions naturally divided themselves into several parties, the mildest only suggesting that we should wreck your company. More mainstream thinkers smiled indulgently at this during the first presentations of legal attack strategies, and soon revealed their hands. It seems, that going after your wife or undigging underage indiscretions of your high-school son presents much better avenues for advancement. More radical party, however, began to prevail by approx. 11 p.m., suggesting that (with a reasonable degree of success) you could be put into a mental institution, where your brains will be cooked with potent drugs, while your skin will dry and stretch on your sordid skeleton that has the bad luck of carrying such stupid head on its shoulders. But, after some discussion, the radicals acceded that as a compromise that you should be left watching as your son is forced to swallow amphimethamine-equivalent drugs through the school system for the remaining years there and be able to do exactly nothing about it.

    We agreed to post you these suggestions and ask for your own choice.

    I have to note that, being of a certain professional standing (and being gentlemen of taste), we all despise light drinks often fradulently pushed under misleading label of "beers" in low-end retail outlets, and as a consequence and of necessity our brainstorming session had to be somewhat shortened (although not lacking in intensity or rigour of our professional analysis). By 11:30 the radical party (having suspiciously stepped out of the room 4 times previously) dosed off, which tipped the delicate balance of opinions; the last thing I remembered was a legal precedent quoted by one of our most senour colleagues:
    • Once a valiant knight went to fight a bad dragon. After travelling for many days he came to a huge mountain, in the side of which he saw a huge cave, into whose entrance many scores horsemen could ride side by side. Smelling the evil winds from the cave, the knight realized that that was the lair of his bad dragon to slay.

      So the knight took in all air his breast could take and yelled as loudly as he could yell "Hey, you, dragon, come out, and I will fight you!"

      But the cave remained silent.

      Then he took more air, and yelled louder "Hey you, son of a demented frog and a lizard streetwalker, you, a Monsanto experiment of genetically splicing chicken wings to earthworms, (then grown for 30 consequtive days in a dung heap mixed with rBST)" and many such insulting and disparaging remarks, but again there was silence

      Then he took even more air and shrieked even louder, and the dragon turned its head towards the knight
  104. I guess by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    I guess the market's not big enough for two companies that makes ridiculously expensive cables that have no effect on the sound. We only need one of those.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  105. Whew! by pugugly · · Score: 2, Funny

    I might be wrong, but I have no recollection of having ever gotten an erection from reading a legal letter before.

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  106. 30 dollars for a HDMI by BillOfThePecosKind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone go to blue jeans cable website? I don't care if they charge less for an HDMI however 30 dollars is still WAY to much for a 6ft cable in my opinion. I got my 6ft hdmi cables on amazon for $3 and they kick ass. Screw Blue Jeans Cable, they're still trying to rip you off, just not as much.

    1. Re:30 dollars for a HDMI by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an employee of BJC - I'd tell you to buy the Tartan. In fact, if you called us, we'd recommend the MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE Tartan. We only sell those because there are a bunch of folks that "must" have them (i.e. "audiophiles"). Besides, the Series-1 cable you are referring to was originally designed and intended for 1080P resolutions beyond 50 feet. Try buying a 75' HDMI that will handle 1080p anywhere else.... We are not in the "rip off" game. We don't hard-sell anything. As a matter of fact, I'm using one of the Tartan 4 foot 28AWG cables on my Blu-Ray and it works just fine, and hy home system is almost 100% Tartan wired. FYI - I am also a degreed audio engineer of over 18 years who works as a freelance post-production sound editor for film/video, so I just might know a few things about this subject.

    2. Re:30 dollars for a HDMI by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BTW - the main reason that the Series-1 is pricey is the fact that it is an AMERICAN MADE cable. I defy anyone to find an hdmi cable from any other source that isn't manufactured in China. Plus, the bonded pair technology is the only real advance on HDMI construction since it's inception. All of this info is on the website, and NONE of it is snake-oil.

    3. Re:30 dollars for a HDMI by seebs · · Score: 1

      You realize that you just posted well-substantiated facts to Slashdot, don't you? What were you THINKING?

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    4. Re:30 dollars for a HDMI by studiorat_1967 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I must've slipped mentally. I could go on about the virtues of Clamato, I 'spose...

  107. So Monster has a holding company here, eh? by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

    Well now I'll have to see which firm has the company's forms. Most of these companies are merely bits of paper in a file drawer at a lawyers' office, and there's very few of them. I'd laugh if my mate was the one who incorporated the firm.

    It is to laugh...

    --
    Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  108. nice by pyro_854 · · Score: 1

    Wow... that's brutal.

  109. Perfect! by chrispycreeme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just found my new favorite cable company! You can't buy advertising like this, Blue Jeans Cable must be thrilled.

  110. Lawyers' names very apposite. by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

    I see that two-thirds of the lawyers' names are 'Grubman' and 'Payne'. Sort of sums them up really.

  111. Not really. by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    The whole point of his response is that it follows valid legal convention. If his company is infringing, it's not extortion for the patent holder to demand compensation. Class-action has nothing to do with this either (yet). He's received a claim, his job is to respond to the claim. He did that in spades.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  112. Wow, what a letter! by dwiget001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two things I got from it: 1) You are messing with the wrong guy. 2) I am putting my balls on the table. Go ahead, kick/smash them. I will make sure that the resulting damage hurts you a lot more than it hurts me.

  113. Wait, there's a judge named "Learned Hand"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ©

    1. Re:Wait, there's a judge named "Learned Hand"? by mr_death · · Score: 1

      Yes, and he had a brother, Noble Hand (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learned_Hand).

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
  114. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by krenshala · · Score: 1

    "pwned" ("pwnd" or "pwn3d") is pronounced "owned". As best i could discover, it was originally an IRC typo (the O and P keys being right next to each other on a 'standard' keyboard). A lot of the newer internet generation pronounce it "powned" or "pawned" in my experience, however. (Gods, but I'm feeling old having typed that ...)

    --

    krenshala

  115. Re:The word "owned" comes to mind PWNED by LogicHoleFlaw · · Score: 1

    pwnies!

    --
    -- Flaw
  116. Bluejeanscable.com Infected with malware(JS_PSYME. by k-macjapan · · Score: 1

    Hey all, first post here. Just thought I would give everyone a heads up. The site bluejeanscable.com has been infected with malware(JS_PSYME.XP). The site was fine yesterday so it appears that someone has decided to mess with our friend the lawyers company. Cheers

  117. Re:Bluejeanscable.com Infected with malware(JS_PSY by AlanBJC · · Score: 1

    Alan with Blue Jeans Cable here - all of our research has shown this statement about our website being infected with a virus to be completely untrue. Our website has been a bit slow for a few days because of the extra traffic, but we have taken steps to correct that. I find no evidence of any malware, and assume that this is just a malicious post to the thread. Thanks to all for the support and the excellent comments. We truly appreciate it.

  118. Re:Bluejeanscable.com Infected with malware(JS_PSY by k-macjapan · · Score: 1

    Hey Alan, the post was not meant to be malicious in anyway shape or form. I was just passing alone what happened when I visited your site. I wish you the best of luck resolving any issue that you may or may not have. I would have prefered to email you this time but your email address is not publicly listed on /. and I will not visit while I am at work. If you would like the information that I have from the attack let me know and I will post what I have. Cheers

  119. Re:Bluejeanscable.com Infected with malware(JS_PSY by AlanBJC · · Score: 1

    We have thoroughly scanned the site, and found nothing but I suppose no one is right 100% of the time. If you have some information you'd like to share, you can send that to me directly at alan @ tartancable.com or sales @ bluejeanscable.com.

  120. Re:Bluejeanscable.com Infected with malware(JS_PSY by k-macjapan · · Score: 1

    Hey Alan, i'll just post what I have here as I don't know when ill be home from work today. The virus appeared when I followed a link from audioholics.com to your site. The malware came from 'http://61.155.8.157/iframe/wp-stats.php' this is what Trend Micro reported at anyrate. The issue occured at 9:36am Japan time. Hope this helps. If I find any further information i'll email it to you this weekend. Have a good day.

  121. Re:filtering not usually needed...get a UPS instea by Sandbags · · Score: 1

    Line conditioners can be added to an entire house for a few hundred bucks. These don't completely clean the line of all issues, but spikes are dropped to a ground line, and a lot of exterior noise is removed. It's a good start, but does not protect from brown out or sags in power.

    In a newer home, with a modern breaker panel, you should not be getting flickering from voltage irregularity in your house, but most people live in homes or apartments built more than 20 years ago, and most systems older than that do not properly isolate one circuit from another.

    Your PS may be rated for 100-240 volt (really 100-120 and then 200-240, assuming the position of the switch on the PS). But that's it's own operating limits, not the components attached. unless you have a high end PS with active conditioning (very few do), then slight variations in voltage going in to the PS do translate through the transformer. Your CPU clock runs at up to 1300MHz, but this assumes predictable 3v or 5v signals. When power fluctuates up and down at small intervals, the CPU clock timing can also fluctuate. This causes voltage iregularities in the board based on capacator timing, other onboard transformers, and circuit paths. It becomes possible using high performance electronics for timing in differnt parts of a board to conflict, and this is a primary cause of mainbord lock-ups.

    CPUs are typically, on most mainboards, protected from onboard voltage regulators. This typically is limited to higher end systems, (and nearly all server and workstation grade equipment). Many modern PCs are also beginning to include these components on lower end products.

    Your home theater howeverequipment, usually no.

    Electronic parts fail for the folowing reasons:
    - environemt (temp, humidity, condensation, etc)
    - abuse (lack of cleaning, physical damage)
    - manufacturing defects (usually reveal themselves in 30-60 days)
    - Mechanical failure (does not apply to solid state electronics)
    - electrical damage (causing either complete part failure, or micro fractures in circuitry).

    All outside factors removed the only real way for a computer device (excluding the HDD, CD, Floppy etc moving parts) to fail, something has to cause micro circuit damage. the only 2 causes of this are 1) improperly regulated power, and 2) EMP or other high intensity EMI. Since MI powerful enough to cause circuit damage is typically only associated with very close lightnight strikes, nuclear weapons, and other EMP causing events (all very rare) this leaves the bulk, over 97%, of all electronic component failures being left to bad power...

    When a power supply is set to produce 3v 5v or 12v current, and the expected input is 110volt to do so, everything is happy. When power runs below 104 volt, the PS needs to adjust to accomodate a continual 3v current. Since power frequencies are at 60Hz, but mainboard frequencies are hundreds of times this, circuits can't be adjusted fast enough to account, and over time, these miniscule errors cause erosion of the substrate materials, and eventually lead to shorts in the microarchitecture. You can look around online and see before/after images of what a CPU looks like under high detail microscope after exposure to cleaned vs uncleaned power.

    --
    There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  122. Awesome by evilninjax · · Score: 1

    Ok, so where can i buy these Blue jeans cables? I'll buy a dozen of them and hand them out with copies of this letter just to stick it to Monster. Man, Monster's products have always sucked balls; i didn't realize they as a company sucked balls, too.