Slashdot Mirror


Do You Really Need a Smart Phone?

Roblimo writes "My phone is as stupid as a phone can be, but you can drop it or get it wet and it will still work. My cellular cost per month is about $4, on average. I've had a cellular phone longer than most people, and I assure you that a smart phone would not improve my life one bit. You, too, might find that you are just as happy with a stupid phone as with a smart one. If nothing else, you'll save money by dumbing down your phone." I stuck with a dumb phone for a long time, but I admit to loving the versatility of my Android phone, for all its imperfections.

608 of 851 comments (clear)

  1. Another way to save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can not own a television.

    1. Re:Another way to save money by Rinisari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cutting cable was one of the best things I ever did! So much more time to code, game, hang out with friends, watch movies, etc.

    2. Re:Another way to save money by lexman098 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And now if you just stopped gaming and watching movies, you'd have so much more time to spend coding and hanging out with friends etc!

    3. Re:Another way to save money by Cigarra · · Score: 1
      --
      I don't have a sig.
    4. Re:Another way to save money by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a TV, but no cable -- I use the TV for a big monitor, get my TV shows off the internet.

      As to the topic, I'd like to have an Android, and I could afford the hardware, but I can't justify the cost of any carrier that lets me use one. I'm on Boost Mobile, flat $45 per month for talk, long distance, text, email, 411, walkie-talkie, and internet. I could justify the initial price of the toy, but not the $80 per month plus minutes a smart phone would cost (and when my daughters call, they talk a long time).

      If Apple or Google want me to use their phones, they're going to have to buy out one of the cell carriers and stop the price-gouging the company they buy does now.

    5. Re:Another way to save money by BoberFett · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have an LG Optimus V on Virgin. The phones are $150ish, $25/mo (think it's $35 now for new subscribers) gets 300 min, unlimited text and data. It's not the flashiest phone around but I'm just too cheap to pay $80/mo or more for a phone. I had a dumb phone until April 2011, and now that I've gone to a smartphone I'd hate to go back.

    6. Re:Another way to save money by AmyRose1024 · · Score: 1

      Boost Mobile has three Android phones. They may not be top of the line, but they're a good selection. I have an Android phone on Boost and I love it.

    7. Re:Another way to save money by isama · · Score: 1

      I bought a second hand android phone and use it with a dumbphone service, the only thing i really miss is having email working wherever i am, but usually when I'm not in range of a wifi network I have access to I'm not in a great position to handle email anyways. But I do have bejeweled and angry birds!

    8. Re:Another way to save money by Aryden · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile $50/ month plan with unlimited talk, text. Data up to 1GB at 4g speeds, after that slowed to 3g. I'm running with a 2 year old HTC HD2 (work horse) running WinMo 6.5, WinMo 7, 3 flavors of Android and a full Ubuntu install. i will not be upgrading anytime in the near future but this was easily the best phone purchase I've made when it comes to cell phones since 1999.

    9. Re:Another way to save money by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Same here, it's the cost of the plans that's kept me cell-phone-free this whole time. It's only a mere $50 + connection fees + ass raping fee + fake government fee + access fee + taxes + CEO wants a jet fee, how can I fuckin' lose?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    10. Re:Another way to save money by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Same here, it's the cost of the plans that's kept me cell-phone-free this whole time. It's only a mere $50 + connection fees + ass raping fee + fake government fee + access fee + taxes + CEO wants a jet fee, how can I fuckin' lose?

      One way I justify it...is that I cut the landline and only do cell phone.

      I factor in the $33/mo or so I used to pay for a landline into what I pay for cell phone with data plan. That covers a lot of the voice portion so I feel I'm only paying extra for the data, and to me it is worth it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:Another way to save money by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out, Boost has several Android phones. Straight Talk also now has two different models (one even has a slide-out full qwerty keyboard) and has the same unlimited $45/month as Boost. To be sure, if you went through the TOS with a magnifying glass it's probably not truly "unlimited" but you're getting the extra features for just the cost of the new hardware. I, for one, am quite content with mine.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    12. Re:Another way to save money by arekq · · Score: 5, Funny

      obligatory: If you stopped hanging out with friends and etc., you'd have even more time to code.

    13. Re:Another way to save money by rwong48 · · Score: 1

      Are there not Android devices on Boost Mobile?

      You could easily get an individual monthly plan with an Android device for around $45 or less, especially if you're already okay with companies like Boost/Virgin or Page Plus.

      I run a 5-line family plan with friends to get it down to $45/month after all the taxes/fees with Sprint.

    14. Re:Another way to save money by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      I don't own a cellular phone or a TV, and do just fine living in the digital world.

      I have various handheld "smart" devices and various computers, but do not have the unresistable urge to keep them networked to everyone else all the time.

      If someone wants to talk to me, they know where to find me (when I want to be available), and can leave a message on one of my land lines.

      It's amazing how much productive time you gain from not having a TV, how little productive time you lose from not having a cellular phone, and how much free time you gain from not always being available.

    15. Re:Another way to save money by Chysn · · Score: 5, Funny

      You should stop coding, too, which would free up more time to do nothing. You'll soon get bored of doing nothing, but that's what TV is for, amiright?

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    16. Re:Another way to save money by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile will give you very close to that price on an Android phone with unlimited talk, text, long distance, and data. You will likely get better coverage to boot.

      http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com/prepaid-plans

    17. Re:Another way to save money by darjen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I got my wife a used iPhone 4. Then picked up a sim from AT&T at their retail store. Put it on a pay as you go plan. Cheap smart phone plan, as long as you don't talk all that much. If you talk more, you could always install the skype app.

    18. Re:Another way to save money by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia, $29 a month will get you a reasonable smart phone on a 2 year contract.

      Not paying for a contract is almost always more expensive - even if you get a cheap phone.

      I'm a bit disturbed by the logic in the summary though.

      Saving money is a reasonable goal, but not if it negatively impacts your quality of life.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    19. Re:Another way to save money by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you've yet to hear of a US carrier called "T-Mobile" - they have unlimited plans for $50 per month (though at that price they do throttle your speed after the first 2 GB each month).

      Oh, and if Apple bought a carrier, I guarantee that you'd pay a nice hefty premium for the "privilege" of getting to say "I have an Apple iPhone on Apple Wireless".

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    20. Re:Another way to save money by toutankh · · Score: 1

      I have an Android smartphone (although I had a dumb phone for a long time and was fine with it) that I bought unlocked with no carrier contract. I only use prepaid on it, it costs me 30$ a month. I will even switch to a cheaper prepaid option if I can find one. I thought having to buy credit once a month would be annoying but it really isn't.
      Agreed, the initial price was high (500$ for a Samsung Galaxy S II a few months ago), but it's definitely worth it: I don't have to stay with the same subscription and carrier for 2 years, I didn't have to allow a company to automatically take money from my account every month and if I move to another country (I tend to do that) I won't even have to unsubscribe.

    21. Re:Another way to save money by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      3 year old dumb as a rock Motorola (yeah, they used to make cellphones!!) that needs daily charging (a replacement battery would cost more than the fone!), on Tracfone. A 30 buck card lasts me 4 months or more (I got double minutes with the fone for the life of the fone!). I use it to make phone calls & some light texting. NO cam, NO internet, none of those bells & whistles. Hell, I even use the default ringtone.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    22. Re:Another way to save money by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      If you think Apple as a carrier would be cheaper, then, well... ...I don't know how to finish the statement other than pointing out that Apple tends to be competitive on everything OTHER than price.

      Google would be cheaper, but, naturally, it would be ad-supported. And in beta, of course.

       

    23. Re:Another way to save money by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      but not the $80 per month plus minutes a smart phone would cost (and when my daughters call, they talk a long time).

      So what if your daughter talk for a long time? It's their phone bill they're racking up, not yours. Let them.

      But use a phone with a loudspeaker function, or use a bluetooth hands-free car device or something though, so you can get on with doing something while they're wittering on. (By implication, they talk a lot without actually saying anything worth listening to, otherwise you'd not be grudging the cost.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    24. Re:Another way to save money by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Can you have broadband without a land line? All the countries I've been in (mostly Europe) require you to have a land line for broadband Internet. Otherwise you are stuck with lousy (and quite expensive) mobile Internet alternatives

      --
      -- no sig today
    25. Re:Another way to save money by loosescrews · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just because you have a smart phone does not mean that you need expensive service. An unlocked GSM smartphone with prepaid cell service does not need to be expensive. It is easy to find prepaid cell service for ~$100/yr which is a little over $8/mo.
       
      T-Mobile even offers a 24 hour "unlimited" data plan for $1.50 on their prepaid service. That way you can have data service when you get need it and can't find wifi.
       
      Personally, I use my smartphone for email and web browsing WAY MORE than I use it for "phone" stuff like making calls or SMS. I easily spend hours using the internet on my phone most weeks, but only spend a few minutes making calls. In fact, I refused to get a cell phone until the Nokia N900 came out because I wanted that extra thing I have to worry about to be useful. I would give up my cell service long before I would give up my pock-sized internet device.

    26. Re:Another way to save money by berberine · · Score: 1

      I got excited for this as $35 is $2 less than what my land line costs. Then I checked and, sure enough, there's no coverage where I live. It's a shame that so many monopolies keep the prices artificially high and force you into contracts.

    27. Re:Another way to save money by sunhou · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the same story here -- I have a TracFone Motorola V170 -- I think it's about 5 years old, and I paid about $30 for the phone back then. I buy a $100 card once a year, which has more minutes than I need (I still need to buy the card to extend the service for another year). My battery was dying on me a couple years ago, but a friend had the same phone and switched to T-Mobile, so I cannibalized his battery. I'd actually love to have a smartphone, but don't want to pay $80/month for one.

    28. Re:Another way to save money by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I saw that on Boost's website, but they don't offer the Android phones on the "pay as you go" plan.

    29. Re:Another way to save money by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Can you have broadband without a land line?

      I do. The internet comes from the phone line, but I'm not paying for landline service, just internet. Sounds strange that we can get that here but not in parts of Europe, I thought you guys were way ahead of us.

    30. Re:Another way to save money by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I have a cheap Samsung phone, my fee for unlimited 24/7 use is $28, with all taxes and funny 911 extra charges included. My phone cost me $40.00.
      Amortize that over 3 years, and it is just over a dollar a month for the hardware.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    31. Re:Another way to save money by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Here (Oregon) most broadband is cable.

    32. Re:Another way to save money by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      The extortionate oligopoly in western nations is really holding back the economy with their mobile communications services. I can safely say that my smartphone is by far the biggest boost in productivity I've gained from a gadget. I'm lucky in that I got a second hand phone and spent 20GBP, about 31USD for six months of unlimited internet access. I wouldn't be able to afford it if I had to pay that amount every month.

    33. Re:Another way to save money by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Can you have broadband without a land line? All the countries I've been in (mostly Europe) require you to have a land line for broadband Internet. Otherwise you are stuck with lousy (and quite expensive) mobile Internet alternatives

      Yes...with my cable company...or also with ATT Uverse..which I use for TV.

      I do the local cable company for my ISP...I did a business account so I could have no limits, no caps and run servers on it if I wanted.

      No need for a landline...not using DSL.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Shocked. by AuralityKev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man who does not need bells and whistles says bells and whistles not needed. Story at 11.

    1. Re:Shocked. by PT_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. For many people, perhaps a dumbed-down phone would save them money. However, for me, for example, the amount of time I save in being able to access email, corporate systems etc., whilst on the move means that the cost and added complexity of a smartphone is more than worth the it.

    2. Re:Shocked. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Man who does not need bells and whistles says bells and whistles not needed. Story at 11.

      Some of us not wanting the bells and whistles aren't doing it out of lack of desire for the bells and whistles, but because the costs of plans are, to our way of thinking, a sudden and large monthly expense.

      I've been observing people who make a fraction of the pay I do and they go about with these things, sucking $80/mo on up. Good for them. They don't have all the expenses or it's simply their choice to hand over that kind of money each month. Very few of these people have any genuine need for these things, i.e. not an EMT or Doctor, it's their little luxury.

      I was an early adopter of mobile phones, having one back in the 1980's (where a mobile phone had range, though wasn't tiny. After a few phones and plans I grew to despise the 2 year leech-like plans and gave up mobile phones. After a cycling injury I decided to get one again, pay as you go, no contract. It works and keeps me in touch when I want to be. Other times it's turned off to save battery. Maybe some day I'll get a smart one, but for now I'm content and watching things develop in technology and businesses.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Shocked. by Idbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm wondering if there would be a similar story some 20+ years ago:
      Do you really need a cellphone? And all the advantages of the POTS and wired phone lines. As someone said... 640k ought to be enough for anyone. No idea why people keep upgrading their stuff.

    4. Re:Shocked. by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      I'm willing to spend a few dollars a month for the convenience of a cell phone for as little as I use it. I'm not willing to spend $80 a month on something I use, maybe, half an hour a week.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    5. Re:Shocked. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Bingo.

      To add, I rarely use the actual phone part of my iPhone and my Android set has a data-only plan for VoIP. It's more accurate to say I have a portable computer which has a seldom used telephone app.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:Shocked. by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To me it's sort of the opposite for the same reason: the amount of personal time I save in not being able to access email, corporate systems, etc. whilst on the move means that I'd pay extra for a non-smart phone...

    7. Re:Shocked. by Galestar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having a smart phone != having an expensive plan. I am on a simple pay as you go plan, and have a Nexus S. It's capabilities are far and above being just a phone.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:Shocked. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      No, because having a mobile phone was a very clear revolution in terms of accessibility. Smart phones are evolution at best, and older smartphones vs the modern touchscreen smartphones are essentially tools vs toys.

    9. Re:Shocked. by ackthpt · · Score: 3

      Having a smart phone != having an expensive plan. I am on a simple pay as you go plan, and have a Nexus S. It's capabilities are far and above being just a phone.

      PaYG plans are about the only way I'd consider going. It's not often I need the full connectivity experience. My dumb PAYG mobile has done well enough for 6+ years and saved me enough to buy a car.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Shocked. by raygundan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every time I hear a person say this, I wonder why the person feels like they have to access all of those things against their will.

      It's your phone. Don't want calls? Don't pick up. Don't want corporate email? Don't even set it up. Don't like to ever be bothered? Only turn it on when you want to use it. I can see situations where a person has no need for the features of a smartphone, or doesn't want the expense... but I don't understand this particular philosophy-- especially if you could use and appreciate the smartphone features for yourself, but don't because you would feel compelled to answer every call from your office.

    11. Re:Shocked. by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LOL, I just think that about 95% of the people who have them don't need really need them. It is a luxury/toy, which is OK, but its darned expensive one when you figure you're paying an extra $100 a month probably by the time you add it all up. There's a LOT you can do with that much cash. I consult for traders and constantly have equipment that is up 24/7 and people scream if it isn't, yet I still don't need a smart phone, just something that will get an SMS. Heck, a pager would do fine if such things still existed.

      --
      "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
    12. Re:Shocked. by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which carrier offers such a plan in the United States?

    13. Re:Shocked. by assertation · · Score: 1

      I've been on your page.

      I didn't get a cellphone until I could get prepaid, pay as you go plans. I'm on a computer all day at work and often in during the weeknight when I home. I don't need a smart phone. I would LIKE to have one, but not at the draconian costs the current plans have.

    14. Re:Shocked. by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      I do need the bells and whistles, so I have a netbook. If I was working on a phone I'd eventually want a reasonable keyboard and root access, and the ability to install new stuff, run a development server.....in the long run having a £10 phone and a £200 netbook seems to be the most effective and hassle-free way to have a portable computer and also be able to phone people.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    15. Re:Shocked. by Galestar · · Score: 1

      ..replying to my own comment.
      Also, in Canada if you really need data service you can get unlimited from speak-out wireless for $10/month.

      --
      AccountKiller
    16. Re:Shocked. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every time I hear a person say this, I wonder why the person feels like they have to access all of those things against their will.

      It's not about "their will". When you put a leash on a dog, it's so someone can hold the other end. When you put an electronic leash on a person, it's so someone can tug the leash on the other end.

      You can say "just don't pick up" or "just don't set up the corporate email" but when you have the capability there is a natural tendency to use it. More important, there is a natural tendency for other people (business or personal) to develop expectations based upon your capability. The boss sees you with a smartphone, he assumes you're always on duty. Because he can. Because YOU can.

      I don't have any problem with people whose lives are enhanced by being plugged in 24/7. But I have a big problem with people who develop expectations for other people based upon decisions they have made for themselves.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Shocked. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Man who does not need bells and whistles says bells and whistles not needed. Story at 11.

      Yeah, it completely depends on usage. As an example, here's mine:

      • I ride to work on a mountain bike, 3000ft down, 1 to 3 hours, often exploring. I need GPS, Google maps and more. A bright LED screen is a must.
      • I listen to music from the phone (microSD cards) when doing sport, no need to carry an extra music player.
      • I go back home on a bus, 40 minutes and it's very nice to watch movies on a largish screen.
      • I never call anyone from my cell because I have a phone at work, a free IP phone at home and skype for everything else.
      • I don't play or waste time with the latest apps.

      I need every 'smart' function except for the 'calling' ability itself. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    18. Re:Shocked. by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      My philosophy is that if you have an important problem you will call. If you email or text me it is not life or death and can wait until I am in the office. Something my wife and I do not have in common, her employees text her multiple times a night, and she always responds immediately. It's the equivalent of standing over an eternal trainee telling them how to do their work. Occasionally I joke with her and say things like "Did they forget how to button their pants? Going to the bathroom is tricky". In the end they will never be self sufficient because she never let's them figure things out on their own.

    19. Re:Shocked. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I *wish* I was called after hours. I'd love to be able to charge 2 hours work for having my phone ring

    20. Re:Shocked. by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's fine, though I'd definitely nit pick on what you say you pay. I pay $115 a month for unlimited text and data, plus generous voice minutes on two phone lines. So if you were being frugal about minutes, text, and data you use you could doubtless pay more like $40-45 a month (maybe even as little as $35 if you shop around) for your plan. That said, in response to you and the original poster, the answer is clearly "no, I don't need a smartphone." I also don't need a dumb phone. Or cable. Or a TV. Or a computer. I could clearly exist and probably even be happy without any of these things. All of them are nice to have however, and in my opinion worth what I spend on them.

      I get a *lot* of use out of my smartphone. Of major purchases, I'd rate it below only my workstation computer and my car on the "things I use a lot" list. I play with it, keep in touch with people on it, use it to get around a my new home city, keep notes on it... I don't *need* it, but if you told me I could only keep one electronic device... I'd probably pick the phone. It *can* do everything my computer can (though often not as nicely), does lots of extra stuff like GPS, and is very portable. I wouldn't be thrilled to do away with my desktop or my TV, but I'd probably get rid of them before my phone.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    21. Re:Shocked. by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding.

      For the counter point of view...

      I don't need a smart phone, but it's value to me is well worth the data plan cost. I am severely nearsighted, and the main reason I got the smart phone was for quick and easy access to my municipalities bus tracking software. It is wonderful for when I have to deal with a route that is very time-inconsistent and runs very infrequently (such as the one that goes by my office).

      Just because someone who doesn't need or get much use out of a smart phone, doesn't need or get much use out of a smart phone, doesn't mean everyone is in that situation.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    22. Re:Shocked. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      One thing you should consider, though, is her supervisor will likely see how she's a team player . She may (and yes, reality doesn't always work this way I'll concede) end up getting a raise or avoiding a layoff.

      Having your coworkers like you is a good thing.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    23. Re:Shocked. by tibit · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there aren't really truly dumb phones to be had new anymore. I have a Nokia 1100. Lasts 2-3 weeks on one charge, with occasional phone calls in-between recharges. I don't think it's being made anymore, or at least it doesn't seem like you can buy it new in the U.S. It has such a battery life because it has a low-power CPU that doesn't do much at all, and a monochrome LCD screen with simple LED backlight. I wish they made a better model like this -- with more modern components, it'd use even less power, and would probably last a month on a charge.

      Modern "dumb" phones have color displays, web browsers, and a lot of seemingly battery-hogging dumbassery that runs in the background. My wife's dumb Motorola (don't know the exact model) lasts about 3 days on a charge, and that's with brand new battery. Oh, and the firmware's response to keypresses is delayed so much that it feels like editing line 2000 of a Basic program on a ZX Spectrum -- it had linear lookup for program editor and the further down you were, the slower it got (Schlemiel the painter).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Shocked. by erroneus · · Score: 1

      In reality, I don't need a "smart phone" myself though on occasion it's pretty darned handy. I would love to be able to own an Android phone without having a data plan and all the crap associated with it. For my day-to-day life, I have WiFi in the two places I spend the most time. On rare occasion I have used my Android phone with modified firmware to make it a wireless access point when I didn't want to pay the fee for wifi at a motel I was staying. But that's extremely rare.

      I was kind of looking forward to the T-mobile buy out though... I wanted to buy the newest Android device and then cancel my contract when it became AT&T then use that phone with one of those cheaper little carriers without a data plan.

      Fact is, I like having the organizer and personal data functions as well as email and web... also angry birds and stupid zombies. I just don't "need" the extra data plan crap that goes with it.

      When it comes down to need, it's easy to admit I don't need it... I just want to have the phone -- it's the carrier's blood-sucking nature to 'require' that I pay this needless crap. I'm hoping this sort of practice gets ruled as illegal some time soon.

    25. Re:Shocked. by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      get some willpower.

      It's very easy to not check your work email when you have a smart phone. I don't check mine with it all the time!

      If you pay for it, It's a tool, not a leash. Unless your employer is paying for it use it for the purposes that make your life better.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    26. Re:Shocked. by FranktehReaver · · Score: 1

      Good Good! Let the hate consume you!

    27. Re:Shocked. by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Luddite here. But it's not because I don't think they'll be useful. It's quite the opposite.

      Ever go to a restaurant and look around at what people are doing? Sadly, a large % of them have their smart phones out, either laying on the table or in use. During dinner. With other people.

      I certainly can identify with the need for being "connected" all the time, but really, how much is enough?

      I'm at work all day surrounded by 3 computers. I answer calls, email, and skype with clients almost all day. The last thing I want to do when I'm out and about on my own time is be "connected". I just need a break. And for those who'll say "just don't use it then", well, I know how I am. If I have it, I'll use it.

      So personally, I've drawn my line. A dumb phone is plenty for me. For others that like their smart phones, power to 'em.

    28. Re:Shocked. by ImFrom4Chan · · Score: 1

      I was an early adopter of mobile phones, having one back in the 1980's, but I got old and went uncool-- not unlike the other guy reaching his 60's who wrote the linked article

      There, I fixed that for you.

    29. Re:Shocked. by assertation · · Score: 2


      It's your phone. Don't want calls? Don't pick up. Don't want corporate email? Don't even set it up. Don't like to ever be bothered? Only turn it on when you want to use it. I can see situations where a person has no need for the features of a smartphone, or doesn't want the expense... but I don't understand this particular philosophy-- especially if you could use and appreciate the smartphone features for yourself, but don't because you would feel compelled to answer every call from your office.

      Its called being compulsive.

      Many people don't have candy dishes on their desks for the same reason.

      I agree with you otherwise. I have a cell phone and a Facebook page. I don't feel the need to tell everyone that I have these things. It cuts down on the problematic aspects of having both.

    30. Re:Shocked. by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Next up on slashdot: do you really need your cock and balls?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    31. Re:Shocked. by assertation · · Score: 1


      You can say "just don't pick up" or "just don't set up the corporate email" but when you have the capability there is a natural tendency to use it. More important, there is a natural tendency for other people (business or personal) to develop expectations based upon your capability. The boss sees you with a smartphone, he assumes you're always on duty. Because he can. Because YOU can.

      I don't tell people I have a cell phone or a Facebook page just to avoid those kinds of situations. I could do the same with smart phone. I will not parade it around at work and if asked I will tell work related people that I don't have one.

      I agree with you.

      I have a friends, who I have told repeatedly that while I have a cell phone it is turned off 24/7, waiting for me in the glove compartment of my car in rare cases when I need it, try to contact me through that phone, repeatedly and get pissed at me that they couldn't.

    32. Re:Shocked. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I ride to work on a mountain bike, 3000ft down, 1 to 3 hours, often exploring. I need GPS, Google maps and more. A bright LED screen is a must.

      If you *need* GPS on a bike, you'd be better off with a dedicated hiking/biking GPS otherwise once your smartphone slides out of your pocket (or out of the handlebar holder) and ends up upside down in a puddle, you're going to be lost.

      I've dropped my Garmin Legend enough to trust it to not crap out if it hits the ground (but always carry spare batteries and a map + compass in unfamiliar territory, just in case). A friend saw a spectacular end to her shiny new iPhone after one inadvertent drop from a table.

    33. Re:Shocked. by duguk · · Score: 1

      Agreed. For many people, perhaps a dumbed-down phone would save them money. However, for me, for example, the amount of time I save in being able to access email, corporate systems etc., whilst on the move means that the cost and added complexity of a smartphone is more than worth the it.

      I'd agree, but even my basic Sony Ericsson W890i can do email perfectly well, and I'm able to use SSH too. It's easy to type on since I've used it for so long, and the battery life of three days is just unheard of now. Sure it can't manage VPN or webpages too well, but email, checking sites are up and SSH, and most other basic tasks are possible.

      If you need that sort of functionality at random points, sure it's useful to have a smartphone. But a lot of the basic tasks are easier and quicker on a 'dumb' phone, and it's sometimes useful to *not* be able to do everything from everywhere. Having said that, I often carry a smartphone in my bag if I feel it might be useful, and for longer journeys, tether my W890i to a Netbook. Plus I don't have to worry about losing it - or more importantly, battery life.

    34. Re:Shocked. by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Do you ever get a vacation or even a day off?

      Wow, talk about dedicated!

    35. Re:Shocked. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Woh. Woh. Wait a minute. The time saved in accessing corporate stuff is worth the cost. You're paying for a smart phone you use for work?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    36. Re:Shocked. by thoth · · Score: 1

      It's all about what is valuable to you.

      I have a smartphone, and cancelled cable TV which exceeds the data plan's cost delta. That tradeoff was very well worth it to me.

    37. Re:Shocked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I find it quite easy to ignore the emails when I don't want to look at them.

      I also find it quite useful to be able to check my emails when I'm otherwise doing nothing, like standing in line, waiting for something/one, etc. Therefore I am utilising otherwise wasted time to do something I would eventually have to do, and freeing up time when I can be more productive on other tasks

    38. Re:Shocked. by Zeromous · · Score: 2

      I dont know but the big three here in Canada all offer data-only plans. All the small companies do as well.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    39. Re:Shocked. by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      If you were a bit earlier to the party you could have paid $25 for unlimited text/data with 300 talk minutes from Virgin Mobile, with *no contract*. I used to think we had a great deal on our T-Mobile dumb phones at $50/mo for two lines ($60-$70 after the fees) with no texting or data. Now we spend $55 total for two smart phones, although we did have to invest $300 for the two phones (which are cheaper now, or can be purchased used). The price is up to $35 if you aren't grandfathered, but it's still a great deal.

      You are right about not needing the features, but every time I send a guilt-free text, look up my next destination on a map, or catch a timely email I'm glad I didn't wait for, I definitely feel some appreciation for the thing.

    40. Re:Shocked. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Stupid people are stupid.

      I see the exact same people dropping $200+/month for cable that they rarely watch. Their choice, certainly, but when I see them ALSO talking about using food stamps or getting AFDC checks, well, yeah, I get a little irate.

      --
      -Styopa
    41. Re:Shocked. by grub · · Score: 1

      No idea, I'm in Canada and there are several options for data-only at the various carriers.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    42. Re:Shocked. by Reapy · · Score: 1

      I was just talking with a coworker about this today, his smart phone lasts about a day, my 'dumb phone' with all that crap in the background I don't use lasts about 3 days. Was saying I bet they could make a more efficient phone with just the basics that would last much longer, but there is nothing like that out there.

      For myself I guess I really just want a qwerty keyboard to text and to do voice calls and that fits most of my needs for communicating. I right now pay about 90 a month for 2 phones, and I'm not sure how to get it cheaper. My minutes usage is basically nil as most of the voice calls I would take are on nights/weekends and my texting is reasonably small too. My wife's usage is up a bit more up there though. Wish we could pool our text messages etc but nothing like that.

      I was a late cell adopter and I'll probably be a late smart phone adopter too, but I'm glued to a pc most of the time so no real need to have anything mobile.

    43. Re:Shocked. by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which carrier offers such a plan in the United States?

      Any carrier who offers a tablet plan. Just buy the SIM and put it in your cell phone, the carrier won't know the difference.

      That said, you can also get a super-low minutes plan, which is useful if you're roaming in an area that doesn't have data coverage. I'm guessing that grub is using something like an iPhone, as there's an IM app that's very similar to SMS messaging on it. Personally, I have been known to break 500 texts/day, and wouldn't be able to do what he's doing. But you can still get a low minutes plan, and add data on top of it fairly cheaply, though, without sacrificing the added functionality... my plan (admittedly it's in Canada, but there are carriers in the US that offer similar plans) is 150 anytime minutes, 5pm evenings/weekends, unlimited domestic LD. That's $25/mo (they have one that's $15/mo for 50 anytime minutes, still has unlimited long distance). I have a $10/mo addon that gives call display, call waiting, call forwarding, and unlimited global texting. I'm on a flex data plan on top of that, which goes from $5/mo for 25MB to $30/mo for 3GB, tethering included, and has an overage charge of $0.02/MB. They're available, you just need to shop around and look at what are called MVNO's in the US (and usually called Fight Brands everywhere else in the world)

    44. Re:Shocked. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Why were you waiting for the T-Mobile acquisition? T-Mobile already allows you to use your own phone. Just buy an Android phone and put your SIM in it, no need to destroy a perfectly good carrier to get what you want.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    45. Re:Shocked. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      You can say "just don't pick up" or "just don't set up the corporate email" but when you have the capability there is a natural tendency to use it. You can say "just don't pick up" or "just don't set up the corporate email" but when you have the capability there is a natural tendency to use it.

      I think the second part is definitely more important. I don't even think it's about whether people actually know that you have a smart phone, but more and more, I'm finding that people *assume* you have a smart phone and that you'll respond withing 10 minutes at any time, day or night. I've had friends, coworkers, and even bosses that will email me at 9pm, and when I don't respond until the next day, they're like, "Why didn't you respond when I sent that? I sent that 12 hours ago."

      Somehow, "I'm not on the clock" doesn't seem to be a reason that people accept anymore. Everyone expects that you're checking your email and responding 24 hours a day. It's really too bad.

    46. Re:Shocked. by dbialac · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have a smart phone. Guess what? It's not hooked up to corporate email. Why? Because I don't want to deal with corporate email outside of the office. I leave the office for a reason. I don't have it for a time saver. Instead, I have it for a lot of other benefits I get:
      * wifi tethering
      * streaming music/pandora/etc.
      * browsing the web (very handy when I want to look something up)
      * GPS navigation
      * Music identification (Shazam)
      * Netflix when I'm waiting for my car to be serviced or some other similar situation
      * Books for a similar situation

    47. Re:Shocked. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Man who does not need bells and whistles says bells and whistles not needed. Story at 11.

      Some of us not wanting the bells and whistles aren't doing it out of lack of desire for the bells and whistles, but because the costs of plans are, to our way of thinking, a sudden and large monthly expense.

      I bought an Acer Liquid Metal smartphone for $128 outright this year. You don't HAVE to have the highest end model. I'm still on a plan till Feb at which time I'll move to another carrier due to crappy reception. At that point I'll decide if there's a phone available on a plan that suits me. If not I'll just sign up for a cheaper plan and bypass the phone.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    48. Re:Shocked. by brillow · · Score: 1

      I make a good habit of ignoring my phone. I even made a nice Tasker widget to put it on a timed airplane mode when I don't even want to hear it.

      Also, make it a habit to not give your boss regular quick turnarounds on their emails, they will only come to expect it. Manage expectations.

    49. Re:Shocked. by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      She manages a convenience store for a small family owned company that has about a dozen convenience stores and liquor stores the only way she will get a raise at this point or a promotion is to marry into it. I wish she did something else but she fell into that position after having a couple laminectomies and needed a job where she didn't need to lift, stand, or walk.

    50. Re:Shocked. by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      Get some glasses. The parent said it's not just about willpower. And employers will make you work overtime if they think they can, and nothing says they can like an employee with a smartphone.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    51. Re:Shocked. by 517714 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My smart phone replaced my cellphone, my GPS, and my PDA. My PDA replaced my calculator, acted as my MP3 player and schedule (sync'd with Exchange/Outlook) replaced a shit load of reference books (now in PDAs, spreadsheets, RTFs, and text files and fully searchable!), provided a secure place for all my passwords and gave me pocket CAS. I also use it for some basic network tasks, SMTP, ping, tracert, etc., and remote desktop access. Internet access eliminated the yellow pages directory and lots of other reference materials. My biggest concern was in putting all my eggs in one basket would I be SOL when my battery died, the phone died or was misplaced? Well it hasn't happened yet and I like being able to ask my phone to find a drugstore when I'm traveling and get an up-to-date listing as well as from the navigation program's built-in POIs. For me having all this in my shirt pocket is very convenient. The downside is that the OS is no longer available and I will have switch phones someday and do without a few of the conveniences to which I have grown accustomed, and pay for new apps to replace existing ones. Do I need a smartphone? No, but it simplifies my life greatly.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    52. Re:Shocked. by grub · · Score: 1, Insightful


      It's a Samsung Captivate.

      I never did specify which iPhone either, did I? (it's an aging 3GS, hardly a "LookAtMephone"...)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    53. Re:Shocked. by grub · · Score: 1

      I found mine here but note that it's for Canadian carriers.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    54. Re:Shocked. by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting that. I am in Canada and had never bothered looking at what Speak-Out offered. That looks very tempting if I decide to buy a smartphone outright.

    55. Re:Shocked. by rev0lt · · Score: 2

      Where I live (and in many places in Europe) using the data plan for VoIP is actually a violation of the operator's contract. I guess in other places it is the same, but people really don't bother reading the fine print.

    56. Re:Shocked. by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Informative

      $2/day isn't very cheap if you're actually using it daily. For about $20/month more, you could get a full blown Android plan with subsidized phone and more or less unlimited everything besides daytime voice minutes (450 peak minutes), with 3G speeds and 4G where available. Factor the $20/month extra into the roughly $200-400 discount on a best of breed Android phone like the SGS2/Evo3D/Photon, and at worst you're breaking even and getting way more for your money.

      Before you say "I wouldn't be using it daily"... yes, once you get a best of breed Android phone, you will, because you'll discover all kinds of things that were dysfunctional internet-wise on older phones that suddenly work well, and you'll find yourself using them anytime you're stuck in a line somewhere, waiting for something, or just bored. Plus, it's EXTREMELY difficult to make an Android phone not sip (if not inhale) data 24/7. It can be done, but it's something you have to actively work to make happen. Any data plan where your billing unit is "minute where at least one byte of data gets transferred" will positively bankrupt you with an Android phone if you forget to disable data, because so many apps endlessly sip data nonstop in the background. Not enough data to really make a difference with a normal plan, even one that's capped at 2 gigs... but plenty to run up a gigantic bill if you're getting metered by the "data-minute" rather than by the megabyte.

    57. Re:Shocked. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      So use Pay-As-You-Go. There's no rule that says you can't have a smartphone on a dumb phone payg plan. And some payg plans would allow you to use data, too... turn mobile data off on the smart phone but have it configured, so that if you need to use google or maps, you can simply push a button on the phone to enable it, use the data you need to, then disable it. There have been times when I've used the satnav in my phone to help me find my way when I had a printed map that was out of date, or when I found myself in an area where I didn't have a printed map (forgot the book at home, or didn't think I'd stray that far)

      You *can* have a smart phone for less than $10/mo. You just need to buy your own phone, and pick a cheap plan.

    58. Re:Shocked. by butalearner · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that a lot of people are paying a huge premium for device consolidation. I have a Droid Eris that I got super cheap from someone who was upgrading, but it's not even connected to any wireless service. I just keep it in airplane mode with wifi turned on, and as long as I have wifi -- which is pretty much everywhere except the car, I have most of the features I want out of a smart phone with no recurring costs. That's including texting through Google Voice (I tried setting up wifi voice calls but I couldn't get it to work). For the occasional voice call when I don't have another phone handy, I have a prepaid phone that costs about $20 every three months depending on how many minutes I used. Frankly I'll take the inconvenience of carrying two phones (though my prepaid phone is extremely light), for the significant cost savings.

    59. Re:Shocked. by joocemann · · Score: 1

      I'm on the toilet at work... You made me L O L. At least its not roflmao material...

    60. Re:Shocked. by froggymana · · Score: 1

      Any carrier who offers a tablet plan. Just buy the SIM and put it in your cell phone, the carrier won't know the difference.

      Well, since I like getting decent coverage where I live my only real option is a CDMA carrier. CDMA == no sim card. Next option please!

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    61. Re:Shocked. by brusk · · Score: 1

      I need every 'smart' function except for the 'calling' ability itself. Your mileage may vary.

      Then you don't need a smart phone at all. It sounds like most of what you're doing could be accomplished by an iPod touch or the Android equivalent (e.g., an Archos 3- or 4-inch tablet). The only exception would be if you are streaming the video you watch on the bus rather than downloading them via wifi. Otherwise, you're better off saving the subscription costs for a smartphone.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    62. Re:Shocked. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Um, what? My phone handles email and the internet, does that make it a smartphone? I'm seriously confused here, I thought "smartphone" meant iPhone, Android, or Blackberry (and maybe Win 8).

      I can call, text, watch youtube, email... you know, I really wish one of you guys would point to a feature Android has that would make it worth the money to me, but I don't see what an Android will do that my phone (a Motorola Blackberry clone) won't.

      I really would like an excuse to buy one, but so far I won't let myself.

    63. Re:Shocked. by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 1

      The boss sees you with a smartphone, he assumes you're always on duty. Because he can. Because YOU can.

      Well, you could:

      (1) Not give your boss the number. Grapple the expectation head-on.
      (2) Give your boss the number with the caveat that at some places the reception really sucks. "Gee, boss, sorry I missed your call. I must have been in a dead spot!"
      (3) Get a Google Voice number, and give that to your boss. It's up to you whether or not you forward it to your phone.

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    64. Re:Shocked. by Pope · · Score: 2

      Geez, here comes a "Me too!" post. Portable internet communication and texting is more important to me these days than actual phone conversations, so, yeah, while I don't "need" a smartphone, I certainly use the hell out of the one I have for all the things a dumbphone won't do.

      Plus I got it for very cheap and signed a rather decent contract thanks to the retention department, so I get way more potential out of a slight increase in my monthly bill. I don't have a land line anymore, so what's not to love?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    65. Re:Shocked. by SteveTheNewbie · · Score: 1

      Which would have cost him around $52/day for unlimited internet. (assuming a 12 month contract, not a 24 month one)

      I do what the OP does when I goto the US as well, I'm starting to get quite a collection of t-mobile sims though. It's a pity you cant just reactivate them.

    66. Re:Shocked. by nightfell · · Score: 2

      This is one of the strangest ironies in geek circles, such as Slashdot. There's a whole subcategory of geek who decries things that "you don't need". What *do* you really need? It's not like there's some objective line, past which you don't need something, therefore you shouldn't buy it.

      The truth is, those that go off on these tangents are really saying they don't *want* it enough to justify the cost *to them*. That's all well and good, but they then seem intent on telling everyone else that they are wrong for holding a different opinion.

    67. Re:Shocked. by Galestar · · Score: 1

      Just FYI: I don't personally have their data plan so I can't comment on speeds/service, but AFAIK they use Rogers' towers. I also do not leave the GTA very often so can't comment on roaming rates/service. Their call rates are 25 cents per minute.

      If Skype ever becomes fully integrated into Android (unless it is and I am not aware of it) I might consider signing up for speakout's $10 data plan and solely using Skype for calling. As it stands I am not a fan of the usability, features, and integration (or lack their of) of the Skype app.

      --
      AccountKiller
    68. Re:Shocked. by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      You have the Optimus V on the $25 plan also? I love mine. It's not the fanciest phone around, screen could be a tad larger. But all-in-all, and especially for the price, I love mine.

    69. Re:Shocked. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I spend $50 a month for my smartphone and I use it practically non-stop. You need to shop around, you should't be paying anywhere near $80 a month if you use a smartphone only a few times a week.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    70. Re:Shocked. by AmyRose1024 · · Score: 1

      I pay way less than $100 per month for my Android phone, and that includes unlimited voice minutes, SMS, MMS, and data. And I'm in the US. I'm on Boost Mobile paying $40 per month, which is soon to be $35 per month. I'd hardly call that expensive.

    71. Re:Shocked. by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the cost is just rough. With the feature phone I've got I can do simple events/alarms. It has a calculator, though honestly I haven't used it more than a couple times in 5+ years. In a pinch I could access my email. I can play MP3s if I want, take pictures, etc. If I need to console into some machine it isn't going to be from the road and if it is I'd probably go insane using a smartphone. Now, I'd be mighty pleased if my phone had all the features that a smartphone has, but I'd use them for anything vital once in a blue moon, and at $1000 a year I can think of many more interesting ways to spend my money.

      I don't really doubt that there are people for whom it is worth the extra cost. Sales guys that are on the road all day, etc. Maybe a few tech people. If I could get all those features for an extra $5 a month? Yeah, I'd do it. At close to $100 a month premium all told it is just too pricey. I'd guess in 5 years or so what is now a smartphone will be a $20 device and service will hopefully be equally much cheaper. Of course by then the cutting edge people will be using something far more advanced I suppose.

      --
      "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
    72. Re:Shocked. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      http://www.inmarsat.com/

      Now stop trying to make up excuses and deliberate impediments. It's not witty, it's asinine. Just because *you* may not have GSM coverage doesn't mean that nobody else does, or that it's not a viable option for a lot of people.

    73. Re:Shocked. by JazzLad · · Score: 1
      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    74. Re:Shocked. by sdnoob · · Score: 1

      I just think that about 95% of the people who have them don't need really need them. It is a luxury/toy

      that's exactly what the i-whatevers are for my sister.. toys. diversions while she's waiting around for her good-for-nothing-ex to bring the kid around.

      we have four phones.. all dumber than a doorstop but they work and work well. we pay less for service for all four of them than my sister pays for just her iphone plan... the cheapest is a prepay, less than $3 per month, *including taxes* for more minutes than we use on it. the other three are combined on one post-paid contract.. a grandfathered plan you can't get anymore since vzn took over alltel -- switching to a vzn plan would be $30+ more for something comparable (and that's still for ''dumb'' phones with no smart phone or data surcharges). we have no plans or desires to switch or upgrade any of them.

    75. Re:Shocked. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      My philosophy is that if you have an important problem you will call.

      My philosophy is that if you have an important problem you will call 911.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    76. Re:Shocked. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Besides, apart from the initial cost of the hardware, a smsrtphone doesn't have to be more expensive. You don't need a mobile data plan, I'm always on the verge of unsubscribing from mine because it's so unreliable.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    77. Re:Shocked. by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I can't speak to costs in other places. Where I am you have 2 choices of network, AT&T or Verizon. Verizon will require a 2 year contract on a data plan, which is basically $100 a month. Subtract out the $35 a month I'd pay anyway for my existing plan, and then add $300 for the hardware. Toss in an app or two now and then and you're getting right up there in the $80+ a month range. Of course I could buy a phone unsubsidized and just drop it onto my existing plan, but there's no data at all on that except at the 'pay as you go' highway robbery rate, and a decent phone will set you back north of $600. I'm pretty sure AT&T is at least equally expensive and their network has crappier coverage (as it is neither of them will sustain a reliable connection at my office or home). Honestly though even if the reception was rock solid it is still a rather expensive luxury.

      --
      "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
    78. Re:Shocked. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      However, for me, for example, the amount of time I save in being able to corporate systems on my own time means that the cost and added complexity of a smartphone is more than worth the it!

      there, fixed that for ya...

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    79. Re:Shocked. by RDW · · Score: 1

      tmobile has a pay as you go for 2$/day which gives you more or less unlimited (2g speed) data...or 30$/month for at least 5GB of data

      I can't help thinking the title of the story should be 'Do You Really Need to be Screwed by Typical US Network Data Tariffs'. T-mobile in the UK sells 6 months worth of data on PAYG for 20 GBP, which works out at about 11p (17 cents US) a day. To be fair, there's probably a lower cap, but I've never hit it in daily use (no tethering or VoIP, rarely video). If you don't have a phone, you can pick up a basic Android model for under 60 GBP. At this sort of price, it's hard to see a smartphone as any sort of luxury.

    80. Re:Shocked. by Gruturo · · Score: 2

      Having a smart phone != having an expensive plan. I am on a simple pay as you go plan, and have a Nexus S. It's capabilities are far and above being just a phone.

      This, a hundred times.
      I see these mentions of $50/mo, $80/mo and I'm just baffled at how so many people let the carriers royally screw them with barely a protest.
      $80/mo per 24 months is $1920. Plus the $199 you paid upfront for most smartphones, it's $2.119. That's outright nuts.

      I paid around EUR629 for my current iPhone (fanboi yada yada) and a 5GB/mo flat costs me 15/mo. I'll probably also do about EUR 5 of phone calls during an average month. Over 24 months, phone included, that's EUR 1109, aka $1441. And I could spend 240 less by going for only 500MB/month, since I rarely go over 1GB and never even try to moderate my use in any way. Without any overage fees: I break the 500MB/5GB barrier? It keeps working at no extra cost, I'm just slowed down to 56kbps. Skype, Viber, Mail and SSH keep working just fine. Of course I can *always* tether at no additional cost. And that's with one of the most expensive smartphones in existence, some android/WP7.5 phones cost way less: a Galaxy Nexus is 538, a Nokia Lumia 800 retails for 430.
      My 24month total cost could *easily* be EUR 750 ($980), still with a recent, top-of-the-line, smartphone, still doing the same voice and data traffic. You guys on the other side of the pond should revolt.

      Oh, best thing? No termination fees. No 24month wait to change phone (of course, I paid it in full!). No SIM lock.
      If I'm unhappy with my provider I can ditch it *now*, fork 15 eurobucks and get a SIM card from any other operator, with includes 10 of credit. I could port my number over for some cost (around 30 I'm told).
      Also nice: If I travel to some other place (Spain, Greece, Italy being frequent destinations) I buy a local SIM card for pretty much the same amount and am good to go. No insane roaming fees. This means my phone number wont work for voice calls/SMS while abroad, though - but most people just IM or VoIP call me and it just keeps working transparently.

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    81. Re:Shocked. by tqk · · Score: 1

      "Why didn't you respond when I sent that?"

      Why didn't you send me email, if you wanted me to care!?!

      I really do not understand the cell-phone craze. Why the !@#$ do you need to talk to me when you need information?!? Yeah, I get it, you hate email. Well, I hate phones, so we're even. Just !@#$ing email me, FFS!

      Just the very idea that you can sign up to data only plans for your cell-phone says a lot. Some CP users don't actually have a CP!

      "Why didn't you respond when I sent that?"

      "Sent what? And who the !@#$ gave you my CP no.?"

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    82. Re:Shocked. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      And then the next time you fail to respond to a call or mail in time, the manager may put your name at the top of the list for the cost cutting process.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    83. Re:Shocked. by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I have a smartphone. I am a lead tech/administrator for a very large enterprise environment. If I am not on call I DO NOT answer calls from work numbers and don't answer work emails, at first this annoyed some people but eventually they got used to it and many even learned to follow my example. If there is an expectation that people not at work/on call are needed then their is something wrong with the allocation of work and who is available on call. If the problem is so dire that they need me then they can dig up my home phone number or drive to my house and find me. I am constantly amazed by people that are willing to bound by their employer in their own free time.

    84. Re:Shocked. by PT_1 · · Score: 1

      Woh. Woh. Wait a minute. The time saved in accessing corporate stuff is worth the cost. You're paying for a smart phone you use for work?

      Yes I am; but that is a good point. There was an article about the subject a few days ago -- a greater number of companies have started to encourage staff to use their personal devices because it saves the company money, and some staff find it more convenient to use one device for both work and personal use.

      Clearly there are a lot of opinions about whether that's the best way to work or not, but in my own opinion, one device for both work and personal use is convenient. The monthly cost of the smart phone plan is the responsibility of the staff member, but most companies will allow their staff to expense additional charges, such as call costs incurred whilst working.

    85. Re:Shocked. by D3 · · Score: 1

      He should become Amish. They don't need any phones.

      --
      Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    86. Re:Shocked. by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      The other day I decided that this was exactly what I needed - e.g. a Galaxy Nexus with data only. But afaik none of the carriers in Canada will offer the Nexus that way - or any phone plan for normal people that doesn't require voice with data just an add-on - even though at least some will sell you a data only plan to use on your laptop.

      As long as I'm griping why is it (I know - greed) that I can get a pay as you go phone that includes caller id and voicemail for less per month than adding those features to a normal cell plan?

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    87. Re:Shocked. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Do you really need a cellphone?

      I know the time when it was said only people who think they are important would have one. Really important people have others doing what they need.

      I minimize the use of mine. It is off most of the time and when on, basically to make plans to meet people in person.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    88. Re:Shocked. by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      I know you aren't supposed to follow-up to yourself but I've now seen other posts that say data only is available in Canada contrary to what I said above - just wanted to point that out.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    89. Re:Shocked. by daath93 · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates never said the 640K ram myth, nobody can find a source for it. I'm no microsoft shill but enough already.

    90. Re:Shocked. by Rary · · Score: 2

      This. We need to stop calling them smartphones. It's a pocket computer. And I got one because I wanted one, not because I needed one.

      Hell, I don't really need my home computer, either. But I want it, so I have it.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    91. Re:Shocked. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      More important, there is a natural tendency for other people (business or personal) to develop expectations based upon your capability. The boss sees you with a smartphone, he assumes you're always on duty. Because he can. Because YOU can.

      No, it's because you don't have the guts to just say "no" - stop checking your email after you leave home, or at the very least don't reply to anything.

      Expectations don't develop in the vacuum. They appear because of what you do. If you keep working after hours, then yes, your boss will start expecting you to. If you don't, then he won't. I have a smartphone that has my email and IM work accounts set up, but they're only enabled when I'm working from home during working hours.

    92. Re:Shocked. by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Your employer also has the right to give all the raise or bonus money to the guy who is more willing to comply. I'm not saying it is right, but it is reality.

    93. Re:Shocked. by rk · · Score: 1

      We pay more, but I don't have to buy a SIM card every time I go from state to state, either. I fly 3000 miles away and when I turn on my phone it still Just Works[tm] and I'm not roaming.

      I do pay a LOT more than you do, however, I'm also paying for 5 phones, which comes out to about 50 a month, a LOT of it is taxes and so-called "regulatory compliance" bullshit, though.

      My last smartphone I got just a week ago (Samsung Stratosphere, not top of the line, but a still respectable 4G LTE phone) was only $28. If you want the prestige phones, they do cost quite a bit more.

      On balance, you *do* have it better in Europe, IMO, but I don't think it's quite as cut-and-dry as some people think.

    94. Re:Shocked. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'd love to be able to charge 2 hours work for having my phone ring

      And I'd like to have Olivia Wilde give me a blumpkin.

      Maybe you are one of the small percentage of people who get paid overtime. Most people don't, since unions have been weakened. Salaries for tech workers are just a way for management to lower your hourly rate. When you sign up for that job paying $37k/yr, you're thinking a 40 hour week, but they're thinking 60.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    95. Re:Shocked. by rhook · · Score: 1

      I pay $55/month for unlimited everything on a prepaid LTE plan, insurance included. People who get locked into contracts are suckers.

    96. Re:Shocked. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I'm an independant contractor. I don't get paid overtime but I do get paid per hour.

    97. Re:Shocked. by rmstar · · Score: 1

      Your employer also has the right to give all the raise or bonus money to the guy who is more willing to comply. I'm not saying it is right, but it is reality.

      I advice against living your life like that. Trying to win the rat race makes you mostly an excellent rat, but a rat nonetheless, and a pretty miserable rat at that. Always having to be available to the boss is simply slavery. Unless you are in banking, there's no significant raise or bonus nowadays.

      You are correct on the point of this being reality. But you can reject such a situation, or you can just accept living in slavery. BTW that's what unions are for, but you lot are having to repeat history to learn that. Or, alternatively, you get to be the most pathetic and codependent cohort of Americans to date.

    98. Re:Shocked. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      I see these mentions of $50/mo, $80/mo and I'm just baffled at how so many people let the carriers royally screw them with barely a protest.

      There isn't really an alternative in the US. Pay as you go will cost you more in the long run since the major providers have very limited options. There's no real competition (read: it's difficult to switch carriers and keep your phone) because of network technologies. And the only pay-as-you carriers with decent rates operate in relatively small markets, or only in urban areas (most of the US population lives in suburban areas with poorer coverage). Finally, even if you can find an unlocked, unsubsidized phone to buy in the US, the monthly plans are the same cost, and still require a 2 year contract.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    99. Re:Shocked. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      when you figure you're paying an extra $100 a month

      That would depend on how you use it and if you've bought it outright or not. On a few phones you can set the bandwidth hogging applications to run via WiFi and ask you if you really want to connect when there is no WiFi.

    100. Re:Shocked. by tibit · · Score: 1

      GSM protocol is reasonably well documented, I wonder what would transpire if one wanted to implement it completely in software using something like XMOS or upcoming Parallax Propeller II architecture. Both are reasonably low-power, and the entire thing (radio modulator/demodulator, GSM compression/decompression, encryption/decryption, UI) could be done using a single CPU. Probably the radio could use very low component count, I'm sure the CPU could handle sampling 1st IF directly. It'd probably be a very simple, ultra-responsive phone... Maybe there's market for it? I'd sure want one.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    101. Re:Shocked. by trigpoint · · Score: 1

      Where I live (and in many places in Europe) using the data plan for VoIP is actually a violation of the operator's contract. I guess in other places it is the same, but people really don't bother reading the fine print.

      Its available here in Europe, just choose you operator/plan carefully. Plus smartphones have wifi.

    102. Re:Shocked. by greenlead · · Score: 1

      They often have cell phones and shared pay phones. They feel that it's OK to use a phone for business or emergencies. A lot of their policies differ by the opinion of their local bishop.

    103. Re:Shocked. by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      Extremely difficult? For nerds on slashdot? I think not.

    104. Re:Shocked. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      You can say "just don't pick up" or "just don't set up the corporate email" but when you have the capability there is a natural tendency to use it

      Sounds like personal problem to me. No, really. If you cant just 'say no' then you have issues.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    105. Re:Shocked. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Wow - half hour a week.

      That's about how much I use my laptop now. I use my phone in its place as I can use it between being jumped on by kids, playing games, etc. whereas even a laptop requires too much commitment of time and space.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    106. Re:Shocked. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Dinner isn't always an event. Sometimes it's just people eating at the same table. What's wrong with browsing, etc. at dinner? It can be more enjoyable than forced conversation.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    107. Re:Shocked. by tepples · · Score: 1

      "You must be deaf, hard of hearing or have a speech disability to be eligible for the Sprint Relay Store Data Only Plan."

    108. Re:Shocked. by number11 · · Score: 1

      prepaid wouldn't be so bad if they didn't force you to keep recharging (if you don't use your calls in the month, you lose them unless you recharge, and if you don't recharge after 3 months, they cut your number off completely)

      (In the US) hardly any of the prepay plans make you recharge every month. With T-Mo credits last 3 months (for anything more than a $10 card), and after you've spent a total of $100 the credits last for a year. Since you'll likely use them up before then (and have to get a refill, which will extend you for another year), expiration doesn't really enter into it. Or if you hardly ever use the phone and don't use up the minutes, the first $100 buys you a year, and each following year is another $10.

    109. Re:Shocked. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      The only smartphone feature I actually use on my phone is the SIP client. Oh, and very occasionally the OSM app. I'd be quite happy with a dumb phone as long as it could make SIP calls over WiFi. Unfortunately, the only phones I've seen like that are shockingly bad at being telephones. I want:
      • To be able to sync my contacts (maybe calendar, don't really care though) over Bluetooth.
      • To be able to leave the phone connected to the WiFi for long periods without flattening the battery so it can receive SIP calls
      • To be able to make SIP and GSM calls via the same UI.
      • To be able to send and receive SMS (well, actually, I don't, but other people I communicate with want me to).
      • To not want to stab the UI designer in the face every time I use the phone.
      • To not pay a silly amount for the phone.

      That's it. There may be phones that meet these requirements, but I've not yet found one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    110. Re:Shocked. by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      There are MVNOs that use AT&T and Verizon's networks (StraightTalk available at Walmart for example).

    111. Re:Shocked. by bdh · · Score: 1

      I am on Speakout, and I should point out that they do not have, nor do they advertise, unlimited data. What they have is unlimited browsing. Only ports 80 and 443 are open, so applications other than web browsers don't work. You can read your Gmail on the gmail web site, for example, but the GMail application (with push notification doesn't work).

      At this point, any number of people will rush in and point out that there are numerous proxy applications for Android (and for non-Android OSes, as well). And that's true. People do root their phones with Cyanogen (which is required for any of these proxies), install the proxy, and get it to work. I know a number who have. But I also know a number who've rooted their phone, installed the proxy, and only "sort of" got it to work. I know one guy who got his data plan working, but disabled his GPS in so doing. When he reflashed the pre-Cyanogen mod, he restored his GPS, and lost data access again.

      I'm not trying to say it doesn't work, by any means. But when people say that Speakout has "unlimited data for $10 a month", it's misleading; it makes it sound like SpeakOut is offering a supported, out-of-the-box solution. It isn't. If you're comfortable rooting your phone and configuring a proxy, it can be a great solution. But of course, SpeakOut won't help you with it, the phone vendor won't help you with it, so you're pretty much on your own.

      Let's be honest, if SpeakOut was selling the same thing for $10/month that Rogers/Bell/Telus are selling for $50/month or more, it wouldn't be the obscure MNVO that it is.

      I should also mention that PetroCanada sells the same service, except their annual minimum is $100 compared to 7-11's $25. But if you use more than 300 minutes a year (not counting texting), you'll be spending $100 a year anyway, and there are a lot more PetroCan stations than their are 7-11s.

      There's a discussion forum at http://www.speakoutwireless.ca/ for those interested in finding out more.

    112. Re:Shocked. by hazem · · Score: 2

      > I just think that about 95% of the people who have them don't need really need them.

      Well, you're going to have to define "need". I mean, as long as you have enough oxygen, sufficient heat, food, and water, is everything else a luxury? Maybe, but I don't think that's a useful measure.

      Do you need a table saw to rip-cut the lumber you're using to make a book shelf? No... with enough practice, you can do pretty good rip-cuts with a hand-saw. But before you get very good at it, you're going to waste a lot of lumber and it's going to take you quite a bit longer to make your cuts. A table-saw is just a tool that makes things easier and better for some people.

      A "smart phone" is just a tool, and for a lot of people, it makes things easier and better. When I finally got one, I was surprised at how much I liked using the GPS. I would never have bought a specific GPS device. Its web ability is great. I've discovered I'm no longer calling friends asking them to find the address for some place, or try to look up prices and reviews on something I'm considering buying. I'm never calling a friend any more asking, "are you near your computer?" Sure I could print maps before I leave (but that presumes my plans won't change), carry a laptop and go to a wifi-hotspot to check things out without calling a friend. But really, a "smart-phone" helps me do the things I want to do easier and better than I was doing them before.

      On top of that, you can get a smart-phone for a lot less than you probably think. I got an Android from Virgin Mobile for $99. I only pay $45/month for more phone minutes I can use and the data and sms are unlimited. You can get that down to $35/month if you only need 300 minutes/month. Straight-talk has even more affordable plans at $45/month for unlimited everything.

      I "need" a phone (smart or otherwise) because it's how I talk to my parents and call into work conferences. But I don't have a land-line, so this $45/month I'm paying is my total bill for all phones in my household. When I last had a land-line, I think it cost close to that much.

      I suppose I could go for slightly cheaper options, like a "dumb-phone", but then I'd be giving up a tool that I find particularly useful, and I wouldn't be paying that much less.

    113. Re:Shocked. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Dont you understand that McDonalds is responsible for making people fat as well?

      They drag people out of their homes and cars, kicking and screaming, and they force their mouths open and shove the food in. The person is held at gun-point until they have consumed every last piece...

      or not.

      People always like to blame other things or other people for their own weaknesses and failings. This seems to be one of those times.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    114. Re:Shocked. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Ah, I didn't see the detail about being a visitor to the US. I thought he was advocating it as a cost-saving strategy for Americans who think they won't use "a lot" of data with an Android phone just because they haven't used much data in the past with a non-Android phone.

    115. Re:Shocked. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      exactly...

      if your life is made up of you doing many things you dont want to do...why?

      I understand work commitment etc being part of that, but if in your leisure time you are not in control of what you do, you really need to ask some questions.

      Too many people are living the life that others expect of them, rather than the one they want.

      Its time to stop and make a change. Start being the driving force in your own life, take the wheel and rather than people being offended because you dont meet their standards, they will quickly learn that you are not going to be manipulated and then they will adapt and respect you more. If any friend leaves you because you are who you want to be, then they probably weren't much of a friend...

      anyway, I'm waffling...but I'm sure there is some truth in there...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    116. Re:Shocked. by hazem · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but I think the difference is between a "feature phone" and a "smart phone". A feature phone has certain pre-programmed capabilities built into it, which may include ability to use email or get on the web, etc. However it's not very extendable. My last phone was like this. It's very much an appliance with a fixed set of capabilities.

      A "smart phone" is more flexible because it has an easy method for adding new programs/apps/capabilities. For example, on my current phone, I just downloaded an app to practice learning Japanese writing. I also have an app that scans barcodes and looks them up on the internet.

      So I think what makes it a "smart phone" is that it has the ability to be easily extended to do things it didn't do when it left the factory. It's more like a general purpose computer than just a phone.

    117. Re:Shocked. by hazem · · Score: 1

      (Assuming you're in the US), definitely look into something that is not Sprint, Verizon, or AT&T. The smaller carriers often have much better deals and access the same networks. Straight-talk has Androids and you can get unlimited everything for $45/month. $35/month gets you 1000 minutes, 1000 texts, and a bunch of data. Virgin Mobile ha similar phones and plans. I've used both for many years now.

      You can get a decent smart-phone like the LG Optimus V for about $99. They both can bill to a credit card, so it's not like you have to go to a store to buy a "top-up" card.

    118. Re:Shocked. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Had you bought your iphone outright in australia, you would've spent almost the same over 2 years with a data plan as you would just going on a voice+data plan + free iphone. The difference is somewhere between $100 (over 2 years) and somewhere in the negatives (ie. cheaper to go on a plan).

      pre-paid only works if you spend enough so that you can use your credit over a longer period, otherwise it expires after 30 days.

      The carriers have thought of everything.

      Even buying a $10 phone doesn't really advantage you when it comes to plans...you certainly wouldn't save more than $20 a month compared to a $50/$60 a month plan, which are the most common here.

      $29 a month here will get you a 1yo smartphone on a 2 year contract. $50-$60 a month will usually get you a fairly recent smartphone on a 2 year contract, and normally with 6GB data and plenty of talk/text thrown in.

      I did the sums when I bought my first smartphone - it was about $50 more over 2 years to just go on a plan rather than buy the phone outright, but way eaiser for cashflow.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    119. Re:Shocked. by hazem · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. The Optimus V is a solid little phone. I tried a newer one with a slide-out keyboard (my old one had that), but actually liked the Optimus V better.

    120. Re:Shocked. by hazem · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Ever go to a restaurant and look around at what people are doing? Sadly, a large % of them have their smart phones out

      Different people have different expectations when they go to do dinner, I suppose.

      But here's a recent example from my life. I was just out to dinner but one of my friends couldn't make it because she was sick. During the course of dinner we were talking about a movie and none of us could remember the actor we were thinking of. One of us pulled out our phone and looked it up. That was handy and added to the conversation. As dinner was wrapping up, I was able to text my sick friend to ask what she wanted us to bring to her from the restaurant. Maybe if you had looked at me at those times, you might have thought I was engrossed in my phone instead of the dinner and companionship at the table - but that wouldn't have been the case.

      But like you say, different strokes for different folks. Much better they're texting away quietly than talking loudly. I was just in a place that had a sign, "no cell phones, there's a phone booth in the back if you want to talk on your cell phone". Odd way for that "technology" to come back.

    121. Re:Shocked. by neonmonk · · Score: 1

      I bought a Samsung Galaxy S outright, $369AUD it cost me. Then signed up to Amaysim. $39/mo unlimited calls & sms, with 4gb of data with free access to social media. More than I need and what I find to be a reasonable cost. And I can cancel it any time I want.

      Sure I'd like to have a Samsung Galaxy S2 (it was released when I bought the S) but I can't justify the $400~ difference for small improvements.

      Having been burnt before, it's nice to be able to avoid plans like the plague.

    122. Re:Shocked. by screwdriver · · Score: 1

      I've seen people on foodstamps with iphones for their entire family. In my book, an 8 year old does not need a smart phone, especially if their family is too poor to afford food.

    123. Re:Shocked. by mianne · · Score: 1

      TMobile has a plan that seems perfect for the heavy data user/occasional caller.
      Its prepaid Monthly4G plan.

      Choose "Unlimited Web & Text with 100 Minutes Talk" for $30/mo gets you 5GB of 4G data per month and then you'll be throttled down to EDGE most likely.

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    124. Re:Shocked. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's more accurate to say I have a portable computer which has a seldom used telephone app.

      And consider yourself lucky at that, because the people who actually need a smartphone are greatly outnumbered by those who just have one bacause its oh, so trendy. Without which the smartphone market would either not exist, or be a very small part of the equation. These folks will claim a great need to text, update FB and Twitter. As portable computers, smartphones are kinda, well lame for anything I'd ever need.

      In the end, smartphone use will have to be throttled by one of the laws of physics. That's bandwidth. There is only so much, and they aren't making any more. Despite what most people think, they aren't. Already there are looming problems between the need to surf pron and watch movies on those little screens, and GPS systems. All because of the demand for bandwidth.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    125. Re:Shocked. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Phone calls have one very positive attribute: you know that you spoke to someone, and there is a record of that call in the phone company's system. I tell people all the time that asynchronous communications are fine, but they will be responded to asynchronously: maybe right away, maybe later. If you want to be sure that I know something right away, call me.

    126. Re:Shocked. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Professor - you have illustrated the incredible evil aspect of cells, texting and smartphones. These little devices now allow people to completely avoid responsibility. A phone call, text or otherwise now allows the staff to relay every single question to the boss. Then the boss makes the decision, and the boss is on the hook for it. This is a great thing for control freaks, but keeps the underlings from ever developing the ability to actually make decisions on their own.

      The crap I've gotten phone calls about is hilarious.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    127. Re:Shocked. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if there would be a similar story some 20+ years ago:

      Umm, no. A cell phone was never a toy. Yet that smartphone is a toy for most of it's owners. The things are the electronic equivalent of Facebook and Twitter. Very trendy, but of limited use, and certainly not high technology.

      TO declare the detractors of these things as some sort of Luddites is indicative of the limited worldview of it's adherents. I don't want a teeny tiny little screen with fairly slow internet access. I'm going the other way. I want speed, memory, and big frickin' screens. Don't confuse the little toys with High tech. Or those who don't like them with stupid fools who are stuck in the past.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    128. Re:Shocked. by kko · · Score: 1

      What is a "phone conversation", and how do I do this to my HTC Incredible? Is this some sort of 20th century slang?

      --
      No, seriously, I just come here for the articles.
    129. Re:Shocked. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      you'd be better off with a dedicated hiking/biking GPS otherwise once your smartphone slides out of your pocket (or out of the handlebar holder)

      I fall often enough that a handlebar holder would break daily. And the satellite/3D view is very nice when lost^H^H exploring. The most convenient way is to use a holder with a vertical velcro that I attach to the main strap on one side of the backpack, very low and close to the body. I can't see it while riding, but the running voice commentary of the GPS software gives me an idea of the distances involved. Nice and convenient.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    130. Re:Shocked. by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Very few of these people have any genuine need for these things, i.e. not an EMT or Doctor, it's their little luxury.

      So.. an EMT or a doctor has "genuine need" and "those people" don't ?.. An EMT or a doctor needs it for what ?.. their job ? .. really ? .. neither of those professions have more of a genuine need for a smart phone than the guy who made my hamburger at McDonalds.. they are equal in "need" of such a device... If a medical professional needs a smart phone to treat me, I think I am better off doing it myself at home with Google search... All that said, it's not about "need" anyway.. you don't need much.. You don't need a TV, movies, or cable, or the Internet, or books, or a hobby to keep you from dying from boredom.. those are wants.. and like all these entertainment "luxuries" those that want to have them will find a way.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    131. Re:Shocked. by Vollernurd · · Score: 1

      Too many people are living the life that others expect of them, rather than the one they want.

      Well said, sir. Well said. I for one deleted/suspended/hid my Facebook account for this reason. Never felt comfortable with it and have no regrets.

      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    132. Re:Shocked. by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent up.

      My smartphone“ (an iPhone in my case, but to be honest, something running WebOS, Android or Windows Phone would also work) is a lousy phone. My cheap Nokia work phone is far better. In fact, every cell phone I’ve ever owned has been a better phone. I don’t really care because I average 1 minute a day talktime and most of that is with my wife and kids; logistical syncing stuff. I was late to the smartphone bandwagon because I lived like the OP for many years; using an old clamshell with a dirt cheap voice only plan.

      Holy cow! I’ll never go back!

      I’m increasingly finding that my phone is replacing my laptop. Many tasks that I used to crack open the laptop for, I can do perfectly fine on the phone and for serious work, I’ve always preferred desktops for real work anyway. So basically, it’s a substitute laptop that fits in my pocket, has internet access wherever I go and a GPS built in. And that GPS has a standardized API, so many of the applications on my little pocket laptop are location enabled; from the useful (such as finding the highest rated restaurant within walking distance, or checking on traffic info) to the useless, but fun (such as finding out about that airliner flying overhead; which airline it is and where it is going).

      I could even put an ssh terminal on it if I had need of one.

      And I pay about €20 a month for it. Are service plans really so expensive in the US?

    133. Re:Shocked. by justsayin · · Score: 1

      Amen brother, Amen. Users and employees can be like puppies. I mean that in a nice way. :) You can train them if you watch what you are doing. If you dont help a user until they start screaming you just trained that user to scream when they want help.

    134. Re:Shocked. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, maybe I do have a smart phone then; they supply apps for it.

    135. Re:Shocked. by Galestar · · Score: 1

      $20 for unlimited everything? Who are you with?

      --
      AccountKiller
    136. Re:Shocked. by tqk · · Score: 1

      Phone calls have one very positive attribute: you know that you spoke to someone, and there is a record of that call in the phone company's system.

      The reality of the situation is more cloudy on both sides of this argument. I think both sides are heavily dependent upon who is at the receiving end and what tech they're using.

      For me, email is great, very seldom does anything get lost, and it just sits and waits for me to get to it. And I do get to it. However, others nowadays hate email, and I can often await notice from those people for weeks at a time.

      A phone call is no more guaranteed to get through than an email. I have the ringer set to high and vibrate on my phone, yet I often don't notice incoming calls. Street traffic and Muzak easily drown my phone's ringer so my "missed calls" count can get pretty high.

      Email to me is very reliable. Phone calls to me are very unreliable. Send an email to me, and you can be assured I got it. Phone me, and you'll need to wonder if my phone's even on, whether I have and check voicemail, or any of a number of ways calls can fall through the cracks.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    137. Re:Shocked. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You can use Google Voice for free calls to the US.

      Skype also has a cheap service.

      For example I pay $14/month for unlimited Skype calling to US and Thai numbers. (my gf calls there on it) They have slightly different rates for different countries. I don't think it matters what country you're calling from, just the recipient.

      You can use Skype with any Android phone, for example the Virgin $35/month unlimited data plan.

      People think of Skype as video chat, but it makes a great phone service too. Google is even better, especially when your calls are in the free category. :)

    138. Re:Shocked. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      I use a pay-as-you-go plan for my dumb phone, and it's roughly $5 an hour amortized out (T-Mobile only charges for minutes you use, unlike pretty much all other plans that have daily fees, use fees, monthly fees, etc...)

      I also have an Archos pocket tablet, basically an iPod touch running Android. I'm in areas with Wifi about 90% of the time, and I don't use it to access the internet that often. I use Listen to grab podcasts - that's probably most of my internet usage. I use the camera more than I use the network on the thing. In a pinch, if I *really* need to look something up with no Wifi available, I have my Kindle in my laptop bag - unlimited free 3G access anywhere. Yeah the interface is rough, but it's free, and available for the once or twice a month I need it.

      I just don't dig the pocket form factor for using the internet. I'll sometimes use the Archos to read RSS feeds, but if I want to check out an article in-depth I'll read it on my desktop. I like the iPad/Galaxy Touch form factor for using the internet, but the data-only plans for those are *ridiculous* Maybe a Wifi version some day.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    139. Re:Shocked. by Gruturo · · Score: 1

      There isn't really an alternative in the US. Pay as you go will cost you more in the long run since the major providers have very limited options. There's no real competition (read: it's difficult to switch carriers and keep your phone) because of network technologies. And the only pay-as-you carriers with decent rates operate in relatively small markets, or only in urban areas (most of the US population lives in suburban areas with poorer coverage). Finally, even if you can find an unlocked, unsubsidized phone to buy in the US, the monthly plans are the same cost, and still require a 2 year contract.

      I'm not implying there's a viable alternative and people are dumb for not choosing it. I'm just surprised there isn't an angry bloodthirsty mob wrecking every major US telco's headquarters. They are screwing people so bad and getting away with it because of a de facto cartel.

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    140. Re:Shocked. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      A failed phone call is known to be failed the moment that the caller gets sent to voicemail. A failed email may never be known. I'm in a very time-sensitive industry, so a delay of even one minute in knowing you've reached someone (or not; call the next one on the list) is sometimes unacceptable.

    141. Re:Shocked. by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I pay nowhere near that amount, and I doubt most customers do. The amount of time I save compared to people who have to hop around to check emails, ask for directions, go to offices to find no-ones there in the first place, miss trains and just generally have a hard time using public transport, go hunting for pens, drive to stores only to find they missed the opening hours and just generally have a harder time doing things is well worth the extra charge. Not that they get by any cheaper of course. I pay less for my data in a whole month than the price of organizing a night out via SMS.

    142. Re:Shocked. by tqk · · Score: 1

      A failed phone call is known to be failed the moment that the caller gets sent to voicemail.

      And if I don't have vmail enabled on my phone, then what? You cell phone lovers make a lot of assumptions about the rest of us. The technology may work flawlessly, but if I don't care to talk to you, you're not going to get through, and you'll have no idea why.

      I see incoming calls all the time that I don't care to answer. I click "silent", they hang up or leave vmail, I ignore the vmail, and a few days later it disappears.

      In the last twenty years, I've known one person who's warned me that emails to them appeared to be flakey at the moment (while their Smarthost was fiddling with its config). Someone who hates phones is going to be a lot more difficult to contact via phone. Emails can fail temporarily, then retry. Phone calls I don't want to hear can fail interminably from the outset.

      If I think this way, why do I even have a cell phone? Because my aging Mom might need help some day, or a good friend might want to talk to me. I love CID!

      The rest of you? "Silent". Email me if you want to contact me. Don't bother trying to phone me.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    143. Re:Shocked. by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      That has nothing to do with smartphones and everything to do with manners. I have a smartphone, but at least I have the decency to not respond to non-urgent messages when I'm having a conversation and will politely excuse myself if I need to do something. A dumb-phone using friend of mine on the other hand is constantly texting people at inappropriate times, like when we're walking somewhere and they're slowly staggering about trying to write 5 SMSs in a row, or we're having a conversation and you can't get a decent word out of them because they're preoccupied with tapping shit into their SMSs.

    144. Re:Shocked. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I work in a time sensitive industry and use my phone for work. Not answering the phone = "you're fired". Different set of circumstances entirely.

    145. Re:Shocked. by tqk · · Score: 1

      Not answering the phone = "you're fired".

      Insisting I be tethered to a cell phone == "I won't work for you." I could be performing miracles for you, but I'm not anybody's slave. For some of us, it's not just a means to a paycheck. For some of us, if it's going to be done, it has to be done right, else what's the point?

      I am constantly offended by the arrogance of you employers. You dangle a paycheck at me and believe I'll jump at any whim you may have to get it? Think again. You don't get to own me. You don't get the benefit of my tens of thousands of hours of hard work and experience. There's plenty of employers or clients out there who don't expect me to be happy being treated like crap just to get that paycheck.

      Go ahead and shoot the other foot. It's entertaining. :-|

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    146. Re:Shocked. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm not a software developer; I don't even work in IT. People's lives are often at stake and a timely (1 min) response is sometimes important. Broaden your horizons of thought. A cell phone may not be for you, but mine has saved my bacon (and someone else's) quite a few times.

    147. Re:Shocked. by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      I've stopped going to tea breaks with our team because they all sit in the cafe playing Minecraft or Temple Runner on Galaxy S2s :-(

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    148. Re:Shocked. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I should've mentioned I was referring to "new" phones. You can always save money by going for last year's stuff...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  3. My Android phone is not a very good phone by HBI · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's a HTC Desire Z, and while it works just as well as others' Android phones, the touchscreen is overly touchy, the volume isn't all it could be for the weight of the thing, and it requires a case. You couldn't possibly just stick this in a pocket or bag and expect it to survive.

    It's nice to get my mail on, I guess, but absent that, I would be totally down on it.

    What would I like? How about a Nokia dove bar with bluetooth support and 3g? Nice tactile buttons and you could just throw it places without worrying too much about it.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:My Android phone is not a very good phone by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      http://www.mobile-phones-uk.org.uk/nokia-c2-01.htm

      There you go (not a recommendation necessarily, just the first thing the search engine produced). If you want something like you described, why don't you buy it? What made you go for the touchscreen Android smartphone if what you wanted was something else?

      As someone else said earlier in the thread- man who doesn't want bells and whistles complaining about the cost of bells and whistles. I like the extra things my Android phone does- but if I didn't, I wouldn't have spent the money on it.

    2. Re:My Android phone is not a very good phone by mattbee · · Score: 1

      Do you carry rocks in your pockets? :) I have had mine over a year, and apart from not putting it in the same pocket as my keys, I'm not too precious about it. A few scuffs around the outside, but the screen still looks fine.

      --
      Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
  4. Slashdot... by tacarat · · Score: 5, Funny

    News for luddites?

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:Slashdot... by durrr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't call myself a luddite but converting to smartphones weren't all the sucess and hype that some made it out to be. It's may do a lot of things with technically good performance but it's not the smooth versatile multitasking of a computer, everything is single-tracked. It doesn't produce beatuiful pictures, just technically good. Changing music is somewhat sluggish. Productive work is not possible. Games are simple at best and calling and text is well, calling and text.
      The overall experience was pretty much meh.

    2. Re:Slashdot... by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      My first smartphone experience left me wondering why the device was so bad at being a phone. It's cool to be 20 other things but you should get the core features right first.

      There should be no part of the core experience that makes you want to flee to a 5 or 10 year old "dumb" phone.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Slashdot... by jatriska · · Score: 1

      I often think this to myself on Slashdot these days. There's a rather high ambivalence towards new tech here. Some of it rather warranted. Sometimes I feel like most of /. wishes it was still 1995.

    4. Re:Slashdot... by lucm · · Score: 1

      My first smartphone experience left me wondering why the device was so bad at being a phone.

      The look and design is flawless, not being able to make phone calls is an acceptable collateral damage.

      Or as they say: it's because you are holding it wrong!

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:Slashdot... by ContraB · · Score: 1

      "Luddites? Sorry, but simply having every piece of new tech only for the sake of it does not make you a nerd."

      Smart phones are no longer new tech. They're at least in their second generation now (if you count smart phones such as blackberry and ancient WinCE phones as first gen, and the advent of the iPhone as second gen... debatable if enough has changed since then to say there's a third generation yet), and the baseline expectations for what features a smartphone offers are pretty well set.

      There are good reasons not to get a smartphone, but to dismiss them as some kind of new fad is pretty weird.

      No way of checking email, web, etc when on the go? I think a great many more nerds will no to that.

      --

      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Much like a newborn puppy...
    6. Re:Slashdot... by greenlead · · Score: 1

      And we used Autopatch if we needed to make a phone call. People thought we were silly to carry around our little hand-held transceivers all the time. Now, look around, everyone's doing it, they're just using prettier and smaller radios.

    7. Re:Slashdot... by tqk · · Score: 2

      Smart phones are no longer new tech.

      Yes, they are. We're still trying to get over the sticker shock. "Free phone!" Yeah, if you sign up for exorbitant monthly bills for X many years. "Unlimited!" Yeah, but only up to X MB/mo., then extortionate overcharges kick in. $deity help you if you try to use it outside your carrier's service area (worse than extortionate roaming charges). If carriers haven't even figured how to price their usage yet, how're we supposed to make any sense of the mess? Oh yeah, "Unlimited", but we're changing the plan on you next month. "Shut up! You signed the contract that says we can at any time, ..." Heard about CarrierIQ yet?

      No way of checking email, web, etc when on the go? I think a great many more nerds will [say?] no to that.

      Not this one. Email is asynchronous by design. The web is not really that much more entertaining than the thousand or so books I'd like to get to before I die. It's nowhere near as attractive as the thousand or so cute chicks I could be chatting up during the commute, asking me about the book I'm reading.

      Don't get me wrong. I would like a pocket sized Linux server (Nokia N900?) I could carry around. But would it really make sense most of the time? I think it is eminently do-withoutable at this point. In fact, in a lot of ways, paying for one now looks like a positively boneheaded "sucker bet". No thanks.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:Slashdot... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Get a G1... they're going for about $75 on ebay right now. Having a real keyboard makes all the difference, installing a custom rom to taste can solve the rest of those issues.

    9. Re:Slashdot... by tacarat · · Score: 1

      I loved that Apple's antenna issue affected lefties more than right handed folks.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    10. Re:Slashdot... by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      And what exactly entitles you to claim that the most expensive product on the market is what everybody ought to be using. Unless it is what some lifestyle marketing drone managed to lodge in your read only conciousness? A smart phone is an amazing piece of technology but it doesnt follow that everybody needs one. I have several laptops, a DSLR, Point and shoot, Digital audio recorder, cheap PAYG cellphone, GPS, Video editing PC etc. Why would I need a childrens toy (performance wise) of a smartphone? For sure it's great for the kids to find the nearest Burger joint when they are out roaming the town. But grown ups are usually a bit more organised and dont need that $80 a month gadget in their pockets, especially when they need something that has enough battery life to take away for the weekend without a crappy phone charger.

      Oh its so cool to be swiping away on your smartphone spy gadget mobile - what can you be doing? checking out your extensive share portfolio? selecting the most radical new tune on the underground? No bloody chance, you're obviously just another looser playing Angry Birds because you dont have the imagination to do anything else.

      A smartphone is 99% a toy for entertainment and there is almost nothing it does that makes it an essential part of life. There isnt anything wrong with toys but dont make the mistake of claiming some sort of moral technological high ground for its users. Grow up children.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  5. Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the most pointless post ever to appear on the /. front page.

    1. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Pointless by assertation · · Score: 2

      It isn't pointless.

      The original author made some good points about how smart phones don't make any sense from a purely financial and rational perspective. For most people they are toys.

      Other people have made some interesting points for reasons to have one.

    3. Re:Pointless by assertation · · Score: 1

      I don't think deciding not to pay for something expensive that doesn't fulfill a need or a strong desire is a dumb argument.

      It sounds like you didn't like his opinion, didn't have a rejoinder for it and decided to insult him instead.

  6. Avoided for this reason by rbowen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I avoided getting a smart phone for a long time, even though I'm surrounded by people with smart phones, because I knew that as soon as I had one it would become indispensable, just like my Visor did, and my Palm, and my iPod, and ... so on.

    Now, I have an iPhone, and it's indispensable. Sure, I could manage without it, but I use it all day, every day, and I feel I would be lost without it. And while I know that's an illusion, I also know how my brain works. ... which is why I don't have an iPad yet ...

    --
    Apache guy, Open Source enthusiast, runner
    1. Re:Avoided for this reason by gknoy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the phone replaces (mostly) your iPod, and perhaps the fact that you find Visor/Palm/Smartphone indispensible is that they are very good tools for whatever it is that you do. Multi-meters are complex things that not everyone needs, but they are certainly the Right Tool for some tasks.

      I haven't gotten a smartphone because I'm unwilling to pay the seemingly-exhorbitant price for a plan. I'm tethered to a PC all day anyway, except when I'm driving, and the only person that texts me is my wife, so I don't need a smartphone at home. ;) I have an inkling of how it could be Nice to Have (maps, GPS, find-a-restaurant-near-me, music player, etc), but since I generally don't use any of those _currently_ I tend to see them as nice toys, rather than a slick consolidation of my existing toys.

      I'd love to have a wifi-only "smartphone" -- VoIP and texting, an app store, etc... down side is, I'd need a separate phone in the car or something, but it could be a dumb phone w/ bluetooth input.

    2. Re:Avoided for this reason by hockpatooie · · Score: 2

      I don't have a smartphone yet, but I know the same thing will happen to me. In fact, that's the universal testimony: "I thought I didn't need it and now I can't live without it."

      Have you ever thought about why? It's because this is the closest we've come to having our brains plugged directly into the intertubes 24/7. Information is a powerful drug. Getting used to having a smartphone changes YOU, even if only a little. Maybe it's ultimately for the good, but people should carefully weigh this before jumping on. I say if it helps you interact with the real world better and be more efficient in it, good. If it just makes you an even-more-distracted, angry-birds-playing information junkie, then not good.

    3. Re:Avoided for this reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FYI, your "wifi-only smartphone" is called an iPod touch. App store, wifi, and you can make calls & text using Google Voice and an app.

    4. Re:Avoided for this reason by b0bby · · Score: 2

      Some of my BB users are coming to the conclusion that the best setup is dumbphone + iPad 3g. Easy to read email/pdfs/etc, good call quality. The guys may still preder a smartphone, but if you're carrying a big purse anyway the iPad is pretty easy to add.

    5. Re:Avoided for this reason by lordmage · · Score: 1

      I love you man. Which is why I dont have a Tablet just yet........

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    6. Re:Avoided for this reason by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Don't be afraid of the iPad - it won't become indispensable. It's a convenience for a very limited array of tasks, and about the cheapest way I know to get mobile internet ($15/mo for 200MB - which is enough for just about everything but streaming content). My iPhone has replaced just about all my other gadgets, and most of my paper requirements (notes, calendar, lists). It can serve for browsing or entertainment in a pinch.

      The iPad is too big to be convenient to carry everywhere and too small and too primitive to do any work requiring lots of input (typing reports, technical drawings, long/involved emails, etc.). It's good for one thing: consumption. I carry around tons of sheet music on it, all of my work reference books, books for fun reading, some movies and music, it makes a good browser for about 80% of the normal internet (forums can be annoying and the lack of flash really is a hindrance), and it's fun to play with. Still, I'll go for days without really using it. My phone - I might forgo 5 days a year.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    7. Re:Avoided for this reason by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Some of my BB users are coming to the conclusion that the best setup is dumbphone + iPad 3g. Easy to read email/pdfs/etc, good call quality. The guys may still preder a smartphone, but if you're carrying a big purse anyway the iPad is pretty easy to add.

      Can't type on an ipad very well... Some folks have no trouble with it, but the lack of tactile feedback slows me down more than I'm willing to put up with, due to missed keypresses. I find I can type faster on an Android phone with a slider QWERTY keyboard (an LG Shine Plus is what I have at the moment, but there's others which are available). Haptic feedback could probably fix that problem for me, but for some reason, there's no haptic feedback out of the box on an iPad, which is a game killer for me. Having a slider keyboard means that I don't lose screen real estate to an on-screen keyboard, and that makes the smartphone a much more usable option for working e-mail and reading docs that folks e-mail me. For anything bigger than that, I'd need a full computer anyway... I recently replaced a netbook with an ultraportable laptop. Purses/satchels that can fit a 13" laptop are easy to get, and still small/light enough to not look like a laptop bag, nor be as heavy.

      So while I understand that your users may find that the iPad works great, I carry a small laptop in my purse instead. I use the phone for almost everything, and if I need to, I can open the laptop, and either use wifi where I am (seriously, even McDonald's has free wifi these days), or tether to my phone. It's also cheaper than having a tablet data plan and a separate dumb phone plan, at least for the amount I use it. :) It all depends on how you use it, but I have found that for my own uses, an iPad or similar table is an unjustifiable expense. I will not, however, ever buy a smartphone that doesn't have a slider keyboard.... that would kill the point in having a smartphone for me.

    8. Re:Avoided for this reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I completely agreed. I avoided getting a refrigerator for the longest time, even though I'm surrounded by fat people. I knew as soon as I had one that it would become indispensable, just like my butter churn, cotton gin, and bifocals. I would no longer have to milk my cows every morning, and I food poisoning would become a thing of the past. Now I have a frigidaire, and it has become a part of my life. Sure, I could hunt and scavenge without it, but I eat 5 times per day, I would be hungry without it. And while I know it's just in my head, I also know how my stomach works... which is why I don't have an oven yet ...

    9. Re:Avoided for this reason by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      er.. buy a used unlocked smartphone and only use it on wifi. I have a tmob mytouch 3g slide which functions mostly well (except the camera got stuck in macro mode) and I only use it over wifi and as a phone. My phone "plan" is a pay as you go but I see no reason why you can't just take the sim from your existing phone. My prior phone was all I really needed (a Moto F3 indestructible) but I needed something to use for Android devel and this came cheap.

  7. No Smart or Dumb Phone by Scarletdown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may be a sample size of only one, but I can definitely state that not only do I not need or have a smart phone, I also do not need or have a dumb cell phone.

    My landline gets little enough use as it is, and when I need to call outside of my local area, I have more minutes on this prepaid phonecard I keep around than I will ever use.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
    1. Re:No Smart or Dumb Phone by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a dumb cell phone because its cheaper than a land line.
      .

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:No Smart or Dumb Phone by YojimboJango · · Score: 1

      I have a land line and am considering a dumb cell just due to costs.

      I sit at work next to a phone with the Internet in front of me, I have a 10 minute commute home where I also sit by a phone and the Internet. Aside from 20 minutes a day that I spend driving, I don't need to pay some one $80 a month to duplicate functionality.

    3. Re:No Smart or Dumb Phone by fermion · · Score: 1
      Honestly the fact that I don't need a phone is the reason I have smart phone. I paid huge monthly fees for a phone I never used. I cancelled my land line because I never talk on the phones, and now pay slightly huger fees for a phone i use, not for talking, but for mail, browsing, texting. I am actually getting value for my money. I recall when I have my palm V how I thought it would be perfect if it had a phone, not for talking, but so I would not have to carry my big phone around. When I got a razr that was nice, but if I wanted data I stil had to carry a palm, or buy an equal size gadget for the back of the razr and double enter all data. I waiting a fair time to get a smart phone but it was one device, on data entry point, and a phone for the few times I needed it.

      For people who are basically at home or at the office and that is all, the smart phone is not such a big deal. But for people who are out and about, and don't want to carry a computer, the smart phone can do many things.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:No Smart or Dumb Phone by hazem · · Score: 1

      > I have a land line and am considering a dumb cell just due to costs.
      You might also look into something like Skype. I just started using it myself because I don't have a land-line and my cellphone's coverage at my house is a bit erratic. For $3.00/month, I can use my computer and FIOS connection to make out-going phone calls. It's works great for conference calling. For more money, I could have a Skype phone number other landlines could call me on. But I don't want that. I don't know if there are other good VOIP to POTS services.

      Just FYI, you can get decent cell plans via pre-paid for $35 to $45; maybe even cheaper if you don't want data and texts.

    5. Re:No Smart or Dumb Phone by avandesande · · Score: 1

      My kids are old enough to be alone now for periods of time and I like have a phone that's always available, so I still have a landline.
      One thing that I think would be a cool product is a cellular phone that has the ergonomics of a desk phone, so it would be comfortable to use and wouldn't get lost.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:No Smart or Dumb Phone by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I am independent, not relying on anyone for bills, food, rent, or anything else. And I still have no need for a phone, despite having a life, a small circle of friends, and biz to attend to.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  8. For some, yes by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For others, no.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:For some, yes by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Funny

      Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others!

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  9. I dont have a phone by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My N900 portable computer have phone functionality.

    1. Re:I dont have a phone by trigpoint · · Score: 1

      My N900 portable computer have phone functionality.

      So does my N9 :)

    2. Re:I dont have a phone by trigpoint · · Score: 1

      My N900 portable computer have phone functionality.

      So does my N9 tablet computer

    3. Re:I dont have a phone by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      The N900, IMO, demonstrates what a smartphone should be like. Sure, it's not perfect, but it had an open OS that was very easily extended. I got an Android tablet this year, and I was appalled at how limited it was - I couldn't even compile code on it. Suffice to say, it now runs Kubuntu.

      For those discussing the increased cost, I'm currently on a $10/month plan which includes 300 MB of data (which is far more than I need). But then, I live in an actual first world country with decent competition in the telco sector (Aus).

      (I'm also looking forward to the release of Kubuntu Mobile, which uses the N900 as a reference model. Since Maemo/Meego is now a dead end, I'm hoping it'll become of the mobile OS of choice for Linux users.)

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  10. Rob's been reading my posts... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like the idea of a smart phone, but I have a greater like for 5 to 10 dollars a month for my mobile expenses. At some point I'll get a smart-ish phone, but only when I get the service I want at a nominal fee without some damn 2 year contract.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by danomac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who says this has anything to do with employment?

      I make a reasonably decent wage. I do have problems with needlessly spending money on stuff that has no perceived value to me.

      Several years ago I turned off my land line telephone. I had a cell phone and saw no need to pay for two telephones. (About $550 a year savings.)

      About a year and a half ago I turned off all cable TV services. I put up an OTA antenna, and wouldn't you know it, the six channels (even in HD) I get are more than enough for me, as I don't watch a whole lot of broadcast TV to begin with. ($1200/year savings.)

      I do have a smart phone now, but work subsidizes half the bill per month. (It's my phone, but they pay for me to use it to get email/calendaring and to keep in contact with vendors/trades/etc.) I can tell you two things: 1. Having email on my phone is convenient, I'll admit that. 2. The convenience is NOT worth $100/month! I'll just go to my computer. I can say if work wasn't subsidizing it, I wouldn't have a smart phone. If it was only a couple dollars more a month, I'd consider it. But where I am right now, smart phones are 2-3x the monthly cost of a dumb phone.

      Everyone's values are different. However, the price of these current services are insane.

      TV/Phone/Internet: $150+/month: $1800+/year.
      Cell Phone: $100+/month (with taxes etc...): $1200+/year.

      I can live without TV, and I could live without a phone if I had to. Internet? Probably not...

      If the cost of smart phones was about the same as a land line with long distance (around $25-$30 a month) I wouldn't have a problem with it. Heck even $35 a month with a data plan. Most carriers are charging $30+ for 500MB of data! Never mind the voice part of the phone. It's just batshit crazy.

    2. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      In Canada, you can buy a prepaid LG Optimus One with Android from Walmart for $88. I pay $10/month for 100MB of data (using wifi at home/work) and another $5 on calls/texts and 911 fees. Assuming that the phone lasts 24 months, my total cost is under $20 per month, contract-free.

    3. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Well, I live in Germany. I own my phone, and have a prepaid contract (Tchibo in case anyone is interested) with a flat rate for data (500 MB max - after that speed drops). Costs me EU 10 / month plus whatever phone calls I actually make (not a lot, I suppose I could get it down to zero if I'd always use Skype). I can switch to another provider at any time, although taking the phone number with me is a hassle.

      I use the phone to watch videos when I ride the subway to work, I have an app to get the public transport schedule, and another to buy rail tickets (I don't even need to print it, the conductor can scan it from the screen of the phone). I use the GPS, surf the internet, check my private mail (my employer can buy me a phone if they want me to check my company mail) keep my appointments, maintain my shopping list, check the weather forecast, listen to mp3s and there are a few games to keep my little daughter entertained when we are in a restaurant. (Mainly painting programs and "fruit slice" - she likes these.)

      Occasionally I read books on it, too - but that's limited by my personal antipathy against DRM. Also I take photographs and videos sometimes.

      A lot of fun and a lot of utility for the price. What's going on in the US these days?

    4. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by tepples · · Score: 1

      your land line, which charge in the $25-30 a month range

      Caller ID is an extra $100 per year on most POTS plans, and long-distance calls are billed by the minute on most POTS plans.

    5. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by danomac · · Score: 1

      How are you saving $550 a year by getting rid of your land line, which charge in the $25-30 a month range?

      A basic land line is around $25 a month. Caller ID (which you really need so you don't have to answer all the %*#)@ telemarketing calls) at that time was almost $10 a month. Oh, they reamed you up the ass for long distance if you didn't have some sort of plan. A city 18 km from me is considered long distance here. So my particular bill on the landline was sometimes almost $50 a month.

      I already had a dumb cell phone with (at that time) a $60 a month plan. It allowed 5 numbers in which you can call unlimited at any time of the day across the whole country with no extra long distance charges. Also, on the cellular network I can call a city that's almost 50 km away with no long distance charges (it's considered a local call.)

      So when work paid $50 of my $100 cell phone bill, I saw no need for the land line, it was redundant. Actual calling with the cell phone was far cheaper than the land line (on the land line the "plans" were for a fixed number of minutes, and if you went over, you paid more...) because of all the close cities here.

      So it wound up that I paid $10 a month less than my old cell phone for a smart phone with a decent plan. Those savings weren't actually included in my original post, it would be more $650+ a year saved thanks to the work subsidy.

      If you think cell phones are screwing you around with the bills, you should look at the bullshit with the land line long distance rules. I know now they are better rate-wise, but there's no reason a city right next to me is long distance! It boggles the mind...

      I think I explained that properly. I'm getting tired now...

    6. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The convenience is NOT worth $100/month! I'll just go to my computer.

      I agree. Though nearly everyone I know has a smartphone, yet not a single person I know is spending more than $60/month on it. The most popular plan amongst friends seems to be around $40/month so I think your idea of a smartphone being too expensive is a false economy.

    7. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      in the us, they are crazy, that is. and yes, they are. those guys make zillion and zillions cause you *need* them and theres generally no replacement

    8. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by danomac · · Score: 1

      That largely depends on the country you live in. Here, after all the fees and taxes, the cheapest plan is between $75-$100 a month. The really cheap ones only allow you to post on facebook or other social networks (no email), have almost no minutes (100 minutes is easily eaten up... if you are social you will actually talk to people...) and have no features (no voicemail, caller ID and the like.) We have a supposed monthly "government fee" for each cell phone too.

    9. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I was responding to a post saying "get a better job."

      For me, a smartphone is convenient but not at the current prices. I can easily afford it, but I'd rather not pay what they're asking... it's too high.

    10. Re:Rob's been reading my posts... by El+Rey · · Score: 1

      Mini-computer?

      Introducing the VAX PAK. It's a backpack that lets you strap your VAX to your back... Order the original VAX-11/780 size or the sleek new 8000/9000 series size... All for only $1995...

  11. I don't even need a mobile phone by Sentry23 · · Score: 2

    But I still want (and have) a smart phone.
    Necessity is not the driver of the smart phone market.

  12. my iphone saved me money by alen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    forgot the details but having email on the go allowed me to get some deals before others. like buying a condo/coop in NYC and getting a lot of the bidding done over email on the go

    overall i don't use it that much but i'm part of a family plan, it's only $30 a month and the device is free after i sell my old iphone/smartphone after 18-24 months

    1. Re:my iphone saved me money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      so you saved money by spending money on things you wouldn't have otherwise spent money on?... ... may i ask what set of chromosones you have?

    2. Re:my iphone saved me money by gknoy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he was buying a condo in New York. He probably saved more than the cost of the phone+service.

  13. Me too. by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree. I have a dumb 2G phone, and a subnotebook if I want to look at the Web or do email. I'm not interested in trying to do input on a dinky screen. If I want to watch a movie, I have a 42" screen at home for that.

    Amusingly, the phone I have has a web browser, but if I try to use it for anything, either Sprint's 2G network times out or the browser crashes.

    1. Re:Me too. by grqb · · Score: 1

      My smartphone changed my life (I think for the better). It's the GPS, not the web browsing that is the best feature. Last week I went on a business trip, rented a car, didn't have to bother with maps or worry about getting lost, my phone told me where to go.

    2. Re:Me too. by Fnord666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      my phone told me where to go.

      My phone tells me where to go too, at least when I'm talking to my wife on it.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    3. Re:Me too. by Animats · · Score: 1

      my phone told me where to go.

      I once considered having T-shirts made up with the line "I do what all the little boxes on my belt tell me to do". That was in the Palm Pilot era. When the iDweeb earbuds came out, I considered "I do what the voices in my head tell me to do", with an iPod-like white-wire silhouette. But "idweeb.com" was registered.

    4. Re:Me too. by Askmum · · Score: 1

      I've used PDAs for close to 25 years now. My first was a HP 320 LX. In those days of early mobile phones PDAs and mobile phones where two very distinct things. By the time they got integrated the PDAs were still too big to be used as a proper phone (my HTC YasYar comes to mind as something I never put near my ears), at least if you wanted a PDA that was actually useful for something. But now I even have a PDA with a phone (smartphone) that is small enough to use as a phone.
      And I hate it as a phone.

      The problem I have with it is that a phone is always on and a smartphone is not. I need to actively switch it on to see if and who called or sent me a text message. And on top of it it does not even work properly with the bluetooth system in my car.
      My 10 year old Nokia 6310i does work with that bluetooth system. I'm going back to using a standard old dumbphone for my calls. On the plus side, it will also last for two weeks without a recharge.

  14. Nope by Veggiesama · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lying in bed and reading web pages without a bulky laptop (or pants, for that matter) is too good to give up.

    1. Re:Nope by PaKL · · Score: 1

      Nah! Thats what the tablet is for, phones screen is too small.

  15. No, I don't. by Cantide · · Score: 1

    I just want one. It's a nice quality of life increase to be able to do Computer Things with something I have in my pocket. That's it.

  16. Necessities often create themselves by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As with most things, you only need a smartphone once you have it.

    1. Re:Necessities often create themselves by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      My old phone had Java ME, so I could check email and that was good enough for me. My friends referred to me as a techno-Luddite. I was an anti-bulky phone holdout for the longest time. But I broke down and got a smartphone and wow do I use it a lot! Thankfully I got a non-subsidized phone and am using it on a prepaid service...still $60/month hurts more than the $30 I was paying with my Luddite phone. Btw, I made sure to get a zombiephone (webOS, ftw!) =)

    2. Re:Necessities often create themselves by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      It's like asking, "do you really need a computer?" Of course you don't. But its kind of an incomplete question. "Do you really need a smart phone to avoid becoming a homeless person?" No. "Do you really need a smart phone to fully understand how business and technology are evolving?" Maybe. But the degree to which is it useful depends on the user. Some people do a lot of real work on a smart phone. Others just kill time with it. Or both!

    3. Re:Necessities often create themselves by jjp9999 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think it depends on what you plan to use it for. I don't own a smartphone, and I wouldn't see myself having much use for one if I did. I had an iPad and an iPod Touch, and I found very little use for either—other than playing games or surfing the Web when I didn't feel like opening my laptop. But I know some people who swear by them.

    4. Re:Necessities often create themselves by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      *THIS*! I had a dumb phone for years. I loved the thing. I was dead set against touchscreens and other fancy things. I didn't think I'd ever have a reason to get one.

      Eventually someone pointed out that because my old dumb phone wasn't 3G compatible that I was being right royally screwed by my carrier for access fees, so I went to the phone shop and asked them what $40/month gets me (which is what I was paying for my old dumb phone connection). Well turns out I got a voice / dataplan with a choice of several smartphones so I bit the bullet.

      I don't know how I'd live without one now. It's a GPS, PDA, Calculator, and Phone all rolled into one. I use it to organise my entire life. I use it to get and reply to critical emails, transfer data between machines, find out where the hell *insert obscure bar in some city back alley here* is without having to be constantly on the phone to a friend who is already there. It saved my skin many times over in Europe where I bought a 20Euro sim card and suddenly had access to the internet on the go and suddenly issues like missing a train, figuring out where the hostels were, etc became a non issue.

      Basically If you don't have a Smartphone chances are you don't know what you're missing. Now let's hear from the people who *HAD* a smart phone and went back to a dumb phone. .... Hello? .... Anyone?

    5. Re:Necessities often create themselves by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      "Do you really need a smart phone to fully understand how business and technology are evolving?"

      I read Slashdot for that.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:Necessities often create themselves by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of when my parents were wondering whether or not to make the leap from crappy pay-by-the-hour dialup to 256kbps adsl. Their argument was that we never used the internet that much, which was absolutely true. Needless to say, we soon after obtained said adsl and never once looked back.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    7. Re:Necessities often create themselves by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Eh, I normally agree, but I think a smart phone can be different. My smart phone replaced a handful of devices. My Evo replaced my GPS, phone, MP3 player, the need to sync said MP3 player with my computer, the need for a laptop (desktop for power, phone for portability), a printer (no need to print pretty much anything), a notebook, a to-do list, books / squelching boredom of lines implements, uncoupled me from my computer for light computer stuff, and in general makes me a happier person. It isn't like a couch where once you slap down the money and get over the joy of having a shinny new couch you go back to baseline happiness as your brain realizes that it doesn't give a fuck about what the couch looks like it when its ass is planted in it. I think that a smart phone, at least for some people, is an actual permanent boost in your happiness.

      Smart phones are one of the very few things that I let violate my "never upgrade rule" on the belief that it is an actual happiness boosting tool. It probably isn't a permanent happiness boost for everyone, but I think for a non-trivial portion of the population it is. Being weary of "upgrading" is a wise idea. Most "upgrades" give you a quick euphoric joy, and then you settle back down to baseline and become pissed if you ever have to downgrade. That is a loss. There do exist things though that make your permanently happier, and those things are worthy of snagging up. Generally things that make you permanently happier are related to human relationships, lifestyle, or health, but for some people there are "things" that can give you a permanent boost. If you are tech-centric, a smart phone might be one of those rare things.

  17. Many smartphone alternatives by Mean+Variance · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are many alternatives besides the premium plans and phones (iPhone, high end Android).

    T-Mobile via WalMart: Android phone for less than $200. 100 mins talk, unlimited data and text for $30/mo.

    Pageplus: Bring your own CDMA phone. My kid has a Palm Pixi. If you don't abuse data or use wifi for data, it's cheap.

    iPod Touch: That's the way I went. I have a cheap prepaid phone that costs less than $10/mo for my light usage of calls and texts. My iPod is in a wifi zone much of the time where I can leverage apps including free texting.

    I'm on the waiting list for Republic Wireless who is trying an iteresting business model for $20/mo. The phone has to have a home zone of wifi. When wifi is available, it uses it. Otherwise data will be used. The phone is a basic Android.

    It just takes a little effort and research.

    I'm amazed at what people will pay for iPhone plans. Some use the value, but I know plenty who still just use it to call and text mostly paying almost $100/mo.

    1. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for you; thanks for the informative post!

    2. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      There are no nice smartphone alternatives. (Other than phones like Vertu, but I'm not paying $10,000 for a cell phone).

      If Nokia still sold something like the 8800 - stainless steel and glass, nice ball-bearing slider action - I'd switch. But these days, all 'dumb' cell phones are $39 plastic crap.

    3. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      ^-- Raises hand. I pay close to $100 per month for my iPhone, and rarely talk on it. I use it for web surfing, but sometimes am not near reliable wifi. I would be very interested in Republic Wireless if they offered the iPhone.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    4. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      There are no nice smartphone alternatives. (Other than phones like Vertu, but I'm not paying $10,000 for a cell phone).

      Buy a WebOS phone off of Amazon or ebay for a great price/quality. :)

    5. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by bingbangboom · · Score: 1

      ^-- Raises hand. I pay close to $100 per month for my iPhone, and rarely talk on it. I use it for web surfing, but sometimes am not near reliable wifi. I would be very interested in Republic Wireless if they offered the iPhone.

      Tmobile has $30 plan with 100min/unlimited text/5GB 4G data.

      You would only get 2G data on your iphone but save $70 a month + taxes.

    6. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by El+Rey · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of Republic Wireless, but I need to tether my laptop at times (eg. waiting for kids piano lessons) and they deleted all of the threads about tethering on their forums, so I'm thinking they are not going to allow it. I doubt I would use more than the 300 MB / mo guideline though. Just need to be able to work tethered about an hour a week.

      If it could replace my MiFi and Tracfone it would be well worth it. If not then I am leaning towards what you are saying though (WiFi iTouch or small Android tablet) and using it with the MiFi I already have, when necessary.

    7. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by smart_ass · · Score: 1

      Little cheaper is this:

      http://www.mobiado.com/index_en.htm

      Still pricey, but in the $1500-$3000 range me thinks.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    8. Re:Many smartphone alternatives by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      I agree that we are paying way, way, way, too much for bandwidth and media in all forms. If you need a contract or there is fine print in the deal, its a rip off, and I refuse to do business that way if I can avoid it.... so thanks for the research on plans that compete with dominant premium market. I'm tired of paying for their advertising and double talk, and your info helps. Thanks.. .

  18. Smartphones save money by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    With a smartphone and a data plan you can quickly determine whether or not the store you are at has the best deal for an item, and if it doesn't, where you could get a better deal. And, it's not always something you can plan ahead for (i.e. you need to look it up while you're out, or it would cost more to go home and look it up in gas/travel than just doing it right there).

    So I don't know, I find it saves me money quite a lot.

  19. Opposite by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not actually sure if I actually need a phone at all. I spend several orders of magnitude more time on my phone doing other stuff (email, listening to podcasts, general web browsing, GPS navigation, etc) then I do actually using it as a phone.

    As such, I'd lose the "phone" long before I lost the "smart".

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Opposite by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      You're probably the target market for the iPod Touch, though I don't think you could do GPS with it. You can get your location through wi-fi, but that's not always available.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Opposite by edalytical · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. 99% of the time I don't need the phone functionality. I'd prefer to communicate via txt message. I have a smart phone because it's a general purpose communication device (web, email, SMS, Facebook, phone, etc) a media consumption device (web, music, videos, Hulu, Netflix, Spotify, books), it is also a camera, a programmable remote control, an alarm clock, a flashlight, a notepad, a todo list, and a guitar amp stack. And, YES I use it for all of those things. It saves me from having to own single purpose devices that I _really_ don't need and would otherwise have to carry everywhere.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    3. Re:Opposite by edalytical · · Score: 1

      But why not have the phone just in case? Plus the cellular data connection is convenient and SMS how most people communicate now.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    4. Re:Opposite by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      But why not have the phone just in case? Plus the cellular data connection is convenient and SMS how most people communicate now.

      Yes, that's what my step-son does. He has an iPod Touch, and I just got him a Samsung 404G for Christmas to replace his LG 420G, which his college roommates have dubbed "the drug-dealer phone."

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    5. Re:Opposite by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I've already owned an iPod Touch in the past. The GPS I used a standalone unit at the time and was fine, but having to worry about finding a wi-fi hotspot all the time was specifically what drove me away from it. If you're not in a big city wifi is more often than not not available.

      A tablet with a data plan would be a better option, but then those don't exactly drop into your pocket quite as nicely.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  20. 2G motorola by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

    I have a old 2G motorola phone I have had for years, that has been to hell and back. dropped, left in the car to freeze, its got scratches all over it and the keys are worn. The only way you'll take it from me is if you pry it out of my hands after i'm dead. Honestly it serves its purpose well, I can text and talk, it's cheap and I find I have no need for a smartphone. (No bells and whistles for me)
    Yet.

    1. Re:2G motorola by Cosgrach · · Score: 2

      Woo hoo! Someone with a little sense. I had an old Palm treo 850. Nice phone. Had it for years and never used the data end of it. It finally died a few months ago. I ended up buying a Sonim XP3300 because I don't need or want the 'smart' aspect. I just want a phone that I can beat the shit out of, but it will still work. While the Sonim has the capability of web, GPS and other things, I don't consider it smart by any means. I could best describe it as a smart phone that has had a lobotomy.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  21. Nail polish by sanchom · · Score: 1

    I agree. Most pople have been convinced they need smart phones not from well reasoned needs and priorities, but from external marketing and the desire to keep up with the joneses.

    There's a tumbler highlighting this: http://wearentreallythe99percent.tumblr.com/. It's a bunch of people saying they can't afford stuff, but the pictures are taken with high end smart phones.

    Yes, you can love your smart phone. I like mine. But I'll never say I need it, and it will be one of the first things to go if I'm in a bind for money.

    1. Re:Nail polish by sanchom · · Score: 2

      Oops! Nail polish was supposed to reference the fact that nail polish sales go up when the economy tanks because people are looking for cheaper ways to brighten up their lives.

  22. He never talks on the phone, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He says at the bottom of the article that he pays 10 cents / minute at Boost Mobile, and his average costs is $4/month. Meaning he only uses the phone 24 minutes a month. That's, like, not at all. He's wildly out of the mainstream.

    1. Re:He never talks on the phone, either by whtmarker · · Score: 1

      $4/month / $0.10/minute = 40 minutes / month
      boost does 20c per minute http://www.boostmobile.com/shop/plans/pay-as-you-go/ for new customers
      t-mobile does 10c per minute if you buy 1k minutes(1 year) at once time http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com/pay-as-you-go-plans

    2. Re:He never talks on the phone, either by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      400 cents divided by 10 cents per minute equals 24 minutes? You know, maybe a lot more people need a smart phone than I thought.

      "How are you today?"
      "Sunny and 52 degrees!"

      "Care to go to the mall with me?"
      "Only if you keep driving down 32nd and turn right in 8 blocks"

      "Does your head hurt after that nasty fall?"
      "Nope, and besides I got 5 new friends when I posted the bruises on Facebook."

      "Siri, do you love me?"
      "I've always loved you."
      "Thank you, Siri. You made my day!"

      --
      I come here for the love
  23. no need for a cell phone by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't feel any need to own a cell phone, smart or dumb. I have a landline at home. I have a landline at work. I don't need to talk to people on the phone when I'm in my car (and I don't want to endanger myself or others by doing it when I'm driving). I don't need to talk to people on the phone when I'm walking down the street, or shopping, or hiking or riding my bike.

    1. Re:no need for a cell phone by kw008 · · Score: 2

      I can second not needing any cell phone. I had one for a while and the main usage was tether/ball & chain/leash. (What time are you coming home? Can you pick up some from the store?) But, living & working in Silicon Valley, you should see some of the funny looks I get when I say I don't have a cell. It causes most people to go a bit blank and not say anything for several seconds. Great fun.

    2. Re:no need for a cell phone by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your thoughts about not need the cell phone when you are out driving, walking, shopping etc... I do have a cell phone, dumb as a brick. This is because the landline that I had was more expensive and it was of shitty quality. So, for me it was kill the land line and just get a cell phone. Most of the time, it's sitting on the table at home while I am out having fun. I suppose that it gets lonely at home all by itself, but I don't really care.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    3. Re:no need for a cell phone by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear!

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:no need for a cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't need to talk to people on the phone when I'm in my car (and I don't want to endanger myself or others by doing it when I'm driving).

      Good thing you're never a passenger in a car - or have a breakdown, or get lost, or see an accident you'd like to report.

      I don't need to talk to people on the phone when I'm walking down the street, or shopping, or hiking or riding my bike.

      Yup, because you never forget any item on the grocery list, and no one would ever want to provide you with updates to any of your plans.

      If you can live your life with your days planned perfectly ahead of time, then by all means, dispense with the phone. But for the rest of us, it's a tool that makes life much easier.

    5. Re:no need for a cell phone by assertation · · Score: 1

      I thought and lived like that for many years.

      Then I got a cheap dumb phone to leave in the glove compartment of my car.

      It enabled me to call for roadside assistance when my car broke down ( try finding a pay phone these days ).

      It is great to carry around when I am meeting someone somewhere. They can contact me if they are going to be late.

      It is great if I get lost, I can easily call for help.

    6. Re:no need for a cell phone by nilbog · · Score: 1

      You're like a generation behind on your reasons not to have a phone. Nobody has a phone so they can make phone calls wherever they are anymore. Now you have to say "I have no need to look up directions, reviews, navigate, use maps, communicate with my friends, take pictures, travel, reference information, access the portal of all accumulated knowledge of mankind and the greatest invention of all time or participate in modern day life in any other conceivable way."

      --
      or else!
    7. Re:no need for a cell phone by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Now you have to say "I have no need to look up directions, reviews, navigate, use maps, communicate with my friends, take pictures, travel, reference information, access the portal of all accumulated knowledge of mankind and the greatest invention of all time or participate in modern day life in any other conceivable way."

      look up directions, navigate, use maps: I do that before I leave home.

      look up reviews, travel, reference information, access the portal of all accumulated knowledge of mankind and the greatest invention of all time or participate in modern day life in any other conceivable way: I do that on a desktop computer.

      travel, communicate with my friends: I don't need a cell phone to do that.

      take pictures: I use a camera for that.

    8. Re:no need for a cell phone by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      Good thing you're never a passenger in a car - or have a breakdown, or get lost, or see an accident you'd like to report.

      Pro-tip: An old cellphone with no plan still works for emergency calls and costs $0/month. Great for a glove-box emergency kit.

    9. Re:no need for a cell phone by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      It'd be quite nice to be able to talk to people, say emergency services, if you fell off your bike and there was no one around...
      Ditto for your car breaking down on a back road in Bumfuck, Kansas, or similar locale.

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  24. Dumb phone with tethering? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    I'd probably be interested in a dumb phone that could do reliable bluetooth tethering with an iPad or Macbook via Virgin Mobile. My Optimus V does that, and for the time being there's been no blockages on my tethered access. Unlimited 3G (so far) for $25/mo.

  25. Need, No. Want? Yes. by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm one for distinguishing between 'needs' and 'wants'. The thing to realize is that if you can afford it, fulfilling your 'wants' is a valid exercise, it's what drives like 90% of our economy today.

    I had a simple cell phone for years - now I more want a Pad type device that can also act as a phone via bluetooth. Is it a need? Heck, I technically don't need a cell phone in the first place, though a basic plan today is cheaper than the landlines, especially when you figure all my family are long distance at the moment.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  26. Come again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My smart phone cost 50 EUR (no lock, no contract) plus 10 EUR for the SD card and my monthly cost is whatever I use the phone for (pay as you go, 9ct per minute or SMS). I can get 200MB 3G data for 10 EUR, but I don't need it, so I don't pay for that.

  27. Hmmm by lightknight · · Score: 2

    I want to say as a programmer, yes.

    However, most of the smart-phones currently being offered are kind of frightful for programming purposes. See, it's the whole tethering aspect which appeals to me, and it's the one thing that I seem to have to most difficulty getting my smart-phone to actually do.

    Which brings me to my current project -> getting my Motorola phone to talk to my PC. I'm working on getting the cloak, sacrificial alter, and goat necessary to make this work, only it's on back order because of the holidays.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
    1. Re:Hmmm by bendodge · · Score: 2

      It's quite easy: put CyanogenMod on it and you're good to go. The Motorola bootloader was this past summer, so whatever phone you have probably has a build now.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    2. Re:Hmmm by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cloak: faireware.com. High quality cloaks, hooded robes, etc. Kate's stuff stands up to all sorts of abuse.
      Altar: You need a stone block, try your local masonry supply store.
      Goat: Goats are pretty easy to get, some varieties are sold as pets. Finding a livestock dealer can be the hardest bit here.

      For actually getting a phone to talk to a PC, it's generally not very hard. Root, flash custom ROM if needed to enable tethering, plug in USB cable. Some phones support "wifi hotspot" functionality, at which point you just turn it on, then connect your PC to the phone via wifi. Depending on carrier you may need to pay to tether, rooting may get around this but some carriers try to detect tetherers.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Hmmm by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Funny
      Finding a livestock dealer can be the hardest bit here.

      A smartphone would probably help with that ...

      --
      Bottles.
    4. Re:Hmmm by lightknight · · Score: 1

      I'd refer to it as magic: http://community.developer.motorola.com/t5/Android-App-Development-for/Triumph-as-a-dev-phone/td-p/16984/page/2

      As for the cloak, very interesting. I wonder why it is that every cloak I come across is made out of the scratchiest wool I can imagine? Seriously, I'm getting an abrasion just looking at it. Think I'm going to want a liner for the inside (silk?). However, I agree that the metal clasps are the way to go (they'll hold up over time, string will fray). Colors should be deeper, like emerald green or sapphire blue or midnight black. I do not think embroidery would hold up well over time, so perhaps a print (around the edges, various designs)? And I could go either way on the hood. A little less Renaissance-fairish, a little more inspired by the Renaissance. I live in the northern latitudes, and if I'm going to be wearing one, it needs to keep me warm, be comfortable to wear for several hours, and have some sense of style. But yes, quality materials are important, as abuse is what most of my clothing gets put through (into the washer, with standard detergent, and cold water, muhahahaha). ^_^

      Hmm. Perhaps I can get by without the alter; there is an abandoned rock quarry up the road, I think I can hew something out if I need it in a pinch. Not sure what kind of stone.

      The goat might actually be the hardest thing to find. Horses for miles where I live, but no goats.

      But all joking aside, the driver installation for Windows for this phone is considered non-trivial at best. Any-time the installer lists "a clean copy of Windows" as a prerequisite usually means you are in for a ride.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    5. Re:Hmmm by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Looks interesting.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  28. need vs want by pulse2600 · · Score: 2

    Most people don't NEED a smartphone. However they WANT a smartphone. Most people also don't know the difference between the two. When enough people have them, the carriers will convince/dictate to you that you NEED a smartphone too. When plain old device service (PODS) is discontinued by the carriers, you will not have a choice but to have a smartphone.


    BTW, I claim patent, copyright, and trademark on that acronym. I will sue everyone and Steve Jobs' corpse for 1 Billion dollars if you do not pay my license fee for using that acronym. Even if you are quoting me, you violate the EULA for my acronym.

    1. Re:need vs want by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

      PS I also own the rights to the acronym Plain Old Only a Phone Service (POOPS). So don't even try it...

    2. Re:need vs want by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, your innovation is invalid by prior art PODS. Be careful for they may come after you. Got deep pockets? (lol)

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    3. Re:need vs want by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I don't need a smartphone. I do, however, find it to be an economic advantage. I pat $100/mo for two smartphones, and I'll admit my wife doesn't technically need one. Still, it's a rare month that I don't save an hour or two by having my calendar, notes, work references, and the ability to discuss projects when in locations that have no landline. At $150/hr (my billing rate), I come out ahead even if count the full $100 I pay for both phones. These days, I'm busy enough that it's actual increased income; if it wasn't, then yes - it would be a want, and I'm willing to trade $100/mo for an extra 2 hours with my wife and daughter.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  29. Stupid Phone by nufrosty · · Score: 2

    I had a fairly stupid phone for a long time. Up until about 3 months ago. I would plan ahead using google maps or use my GPS when travelling. However, that doesn't help much when you are walking around a new city. Now that I have a semi-smart phone (BB), planning ahead becomes less necessary and there isn't much risk of having to ask people in a bad (or perhaps bad) neighborhood for directions.

    To each their own. You can certainly live without, but it seems like a philosophical stance against technology. Seems like the OP doesn't travel much.

  30. Stupid claim by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I assure you a smart phone would not improve my life one bit".

    Sorry, but that statement is frankly idiotic. You have NEVER needed a map? Yeah right.

    There are a thousand other little ways in which a smartphone improves your life, that's just the most obvious...

    Also, most smart phones can be dropped or even accidentally put in water with the same survival rate as your dumb phone.

    I can totally understand someone simply not wanting much of a monthly bill, but lets not get absurd about there being no tradeoff for going dumb.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Stupid claim by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, but that statement is frankly idiotic. You have NEVER needed a map? Yeah right.

      Well, ya, but I have a map for that... No seriously, an actual map. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Stupid claim by ewieling · · Score: 1

      Are the improvements to my life worth the $1,800 extra in monthly service costs (assuming a 3 year lifetime of the phone) and $300-$400 cost of the no-contract phone? I doubt it, but I could be wrong.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    3. Re:Stupid claim by edalytical · · Score: 1

      Also, most smart phones can be dropped or even accidentally put in water with the same survival rate as your dumb phone.

      And unless you are constantly drunk, what does it matter? Or some super uncoordinated clumsy person -- gee, I hope they don't let you drive a car.

      I've never dropped my phones. I had an HTC back before the iPhone, then an original iPhone and now a iPhone 4. I use minimal cases and never ever drop them. Not once have I broke a phone. All of them are still 100% functional.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    4. Re:Stupid claim by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're going to pay the $1800, why would you buy a no-contract phone?

      For $1.50 a day, everything that my wife or daughter schedules on our calendar is instantly synced to my calendar on my phone. Wherever I am, and whatever I'm doing, I can check and see if *event* can be scheduled. And, when I do schedule it, it gets pushed to my wife's phone and (soon) my daughter's iPod touch*. If I'm stuck somewhere, I have access to every email and every phone number in my book. No paper required. Sure, I could call information and get the number (provided there's phone), and it only costs me $2. It's a lot easier and faster with a phone.

      Is it a major expense? Yes. If it came down to it, I would likely keep the "phone" and try to get a data-only plan ($15/mo for my iPad, for example), as I don't absolutely need voice service. But I use voice for business, and as long as I have 20 minutes of billable time a month, the phone pays for itself.

      Everybody's situation is different. My wife didn't want one - she liked her dumb phone. She didn't see any real use for one. That evaporated about two days after she got her iPhone (which only costs us $15 more than here dumb phone per month, and adds free text messaging and data). There aren't too many devices which are real world changers, but unless you are a recluse this is one of them.

      *not inadvertently scheduling a conflict with your kid's concert: priceless

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Stupid claim by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that statement is frankly idiotic. You have NEVER needed a map? Yeah right.

      Well, ya, but I have a map for that... No seriously, an actual map. :-)

      you'd need a very large bag to carry as many maps as I can carry on my very small smartphone.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:Stupid claim by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      A map that you carry with you at all times - or only in your car? And what is it a map of? Say you live in CA, but you're going to NV on a trip - do you buy an NV map ahead of time? print out just your route before you leave? Decide to grab a map when you arrive there? But what if you arrive after stores close? Hop into any random hotel and pick up one of their maps?

      What about an alarm clock? You have one already - what if you go on a trip? Your hotel has one? Great. What if you're going on a long trip and decide to take a 2-hour snooze lest your car becomes a weapon at the hands of your tired self? Did you take the alarm with you, along with a car adapter, and plugged it in? Do you then leave the engine running? Or do you trust your own body to wake you in 2 hours, rather than, say, 6?

      What about books? Bring a stack with you all the time? Music? Got a suitcase full of CDs or a separate MP3 player? Movies? Going to go with the "I have a 56" TV at home" excuse? Simple entertainment? Boardgames strapped to your back?

      No, nobody needs a smartphone. Just like nobody needs a phone. Or an alarm clock. Or a book. But they're nice to have, and it's even nicer to have them available conveniently and in general not have to worry about them at all. That's something a smartphone can offer. Some people may take that a bit too far and put 5,000 books on their device - but let them.. at least it offers them a wide choice, versus the 2 pocket-sized books you could reasonably carry in your pants at any time.

      It also means that if your smartphone dies, you will have lost all of the above - so carrying a map in your car is still a good idea. But the story's main statement is fairly naive.

    7. Re:Stupid claim by SumterLiving · · Score: 1

      From 1977 and through to the pre-cell phone days I didn't...well forget it. You obviously would get the point.

    8. Re:Stupid claim by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      Chill dude, chill; you'll live longer :-)

      To answer your queries. I have a simple Qualcomm QCP-1900 from 1988 that I have for emergencies. If I'm going somewhere unfamiliar, I either get directions from someone (or Google Maps / MapQuest) or buy an actual map depending on how much time I'm going to spend driving around my destination. Sometime I'll scrounge when I get there. I don't use an alarm clock or wear a watch as I generally don't care what time it is or wake up - not even for work (yes, I'm special). I don't snooze in the car. I bring or will buy/borrow a book if needed, don't need to listen to music or watch TV/movies on a whim. If I get bored, I find something to do...

      Merry New Year!

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Stupid claim by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      you'd need a very large bag to carry as many maps as I can carry on my very small smartphone.

      I've got bigger problems. I have one of those Steven Wright maps of the US - its actual size. The legend says "1 mile = 1 mile". Steven lives at E4.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    10. Re:Stupid claim by dkf · · Score: 1

      A map that you carry with you at all times - or only in your car? And what is it a map of? Say you live in CA, but you're going to NV on a trip - do you buy an NV map ahead of time?

      Those of us who memorize maps for fun find your whole attitude amusing. A quick glance at a map before we go (on paper or on a computer) and we're good for the whole trip, including rerouting around problems and/or to make interesting side-trips. Eidetic memory has some benefits, though perhaps not as many as you might imagine...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    11. Re:Stupid claim by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      If you're including 3 years of service costs, then the phone only costs $100 or so since it'll be subsidized. And you really need to work that out for yourself. For me, having internet everywhere is worth a lot. I live in a city where I walk around and get lost a lot. If you go to a store and find something is out of stock, your phone can tell you who else might have one, and show you a map of how to get there.

      If I'm in one of the large box stores and I can't find a price tag, I just scan the item with my phone and get all the details.

      When my internet goes down at home (fucking rogers), I just tether to my phone.

      If I need to rent a car, I can arrange a zipcar through my phone, and even honk the horn to help me find where its parked.

      There are a million small uses, and to me, they're worth the $30/month I pay for data.

      --
      :x
    12. Re:Stupid claim by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      All of the examples you mention do just fine on a device that doesn't require a data plan of any sort. You can get capable and cheap android wifi-only devices for well under a hundred bucks these days, no monthly plan needed after that, cell or other.

    13. Re:Stupid claim by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that statement is frankly idiotic. You have NEVER needed a map? Yeah right.

      No. I write down the directions before I leave the house.

    14. Re:Stupid claim by evalhalla · · Score: 1

      What about an alarm clock?

      My very dumb, 25€ phone features an alarm clock; it won't update itself for DST or timezone change, but it won't even fail every morning after a DST change, like certain other smart phones.
      It also has a simple calculator, and a very useful led torchlight.
      It has survived drops, being wet, consumes quite little (I recharge about once a week its 700mAh, 3.7V battery) and fits in every pocket.

      On the other hand, I also usually have some other internet capable non-phone device with me: it used to be a netbook, now it is a pandora: those need more power, of course, but I'm able to turn them off when not in use (not just in a standby status that allows them to receive calls), and I can use them dry when needed, knowing that in any small emergency I still have the phone for important communcations.

    15. Re:Stupid claim by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

      You must not go very many places then, or your car has a trunk full of 1:25000 scale maps in it;)
      To be fair when I'm trekking I prefer a physical map too, but when looking for a specific street in a city, let alone for something like 'a store that sells luggage near my current position', you can't beat something like Google maps.
      E.

    16. Re:Stupid claim by moonbender · · Score: 1

      That's great. Meanwhile, those of us with more interesting hobbies use a computer or buy a map.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    17. Re:Stupid claim by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Which is about as useful as a post office telegram compared to a cellphone.

  31. Water? Pshaw. by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Informative

    My phone is as stupid as a phone can be, but you can drop it or get it wet and it will still work.

    My two-year-old dropped my iPhone 3gs in the dog's water bowl. From the time I heard the *ploink*, realized what I had heard, and ran to the kitchen and pulled out the phone out, it was completely submerged in disgusting dog water for at least 15-20 seconds.

    The touch screen was so wet that I couldn't swipe to unlock in order to power down. The phone was on at least another 1-2 minutes. I finally turned it off (obviously can't pull the battery with an iPhone) and let it dry out for a couple days. On day 2, I put it in a ziploc baggie with some silica gel packets. During the drying process it would occasionally--randomly!--turn itself on with no interaction from me.

    After 2 days of drying, it was good as new. Fully functional, no visible damage, screen fine, touch response fine, etc.

    I was very impressed.

    1. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      On day 2, I put it in a ziploc baggie with some silica gel packets. During the drying process it would occasionally--randomly!--turn itself on with no interaction from me.

      After 2 days of drying, it was good as new. Fully functional, no visible damage, screen fine, touch response fine, etc.

      I was very impressed.

      Since most people don't keep silica gel packets around (I won't judge you based the contents of your kitchen cabinet), it's worth pointing out that the same result is possible with rice.

    2. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Agree. I had silica gel packets from a shoebox. I used rice once before with a keyboard spill with good effect.

    3. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Maow · · Score: 1

      My two-year-old dropped my iPhone 3gs in the dog's water bowl. From the time I heard the *ploink*, realized what I had heard, and ran to the kitchen and pulled out the phone out, it was completely submerged in disgusting dog water for at least 15-20 seconds.

      Similar thing here! Did it to myself though, was an Android phone, and only submerged for a couple seconds. Recovered okay too.

      However, as an aside for anyone reading this, you probably shouldn't let your dog's water get to the "disgusting" stage. I understand that any water a dog's drank from could be termed "disgusting", but some folks wait 'til it's nearly empty to replace it, at which point it's likely disgusting even to a dog. Refresh it often!

      Only mentioning the last part as a general PSA 'cause I'm still mourning my dog. :-(

      "Oogway Girrrrrul!"

      Cheers

    4. Re:Water? Pshaw. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      A couple of days ago, I saw a mother with a toddler in a buggy, and the toddler was playing with a brand-new iPhone. Of course, the phone fell on the stone floor.

      As a non-parent, what on earth could move you to give an expensive phone to a toddler??

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    5. Re:Water? Pshaw. by petman · · Score: 1

      Since most people don't keep silica gel packets around (I won't judge you based the contents of your kitchen cabinet), it's worth pointing out that the same result is possible with rice.

      Cooked or uncooked? I'm guessing uncooked, but you never know.

    6. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Uncooked!

      Dried rice is pretty darn good at sucking up moisture.

    7. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Sorry for your loss...it's an awful thing to lose a pet.

    8. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I would not let my son play with a brand new phone (this one is 2 years old)...but he loves using the iphone and ipad. Since he was about 1.5 years old he can swipe screens and start his apps (interactive books, guitar app, keyboard app, etc). I think they're great devices (in moderation!) for little ones. My phone had a case so it was pretty well protected from falling. I did not expect the dog water (my fault). Lucky for me that lesson didn't turn out too horribly.

    9. Re:Water? Pshaw. by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      .......But now the dog rings...

  32. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have an iPhone - wait for it - without a contract. It's on AT&T's GoPhone style pay as you go service.

    So once you get past the initial hardware, which then comes down to a typical hardware decision, I get all the fun of a smartphone in places with wifi (work and McDonalds!) but all the low expenses of a prepaid-as-you-go plan.

    $100 in phone service lasts me about 4 months.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  33. Get a smart phone already by Tikkun · · Score: 1

    Seriously. It will change your life. So many crappy things in life are made simple and easy by owning one. It's worth the $80-$100 a month you pay for service.

    1. Re:Get a smart phone already by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm convinced.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  34. What a worthless fucking post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously. Is this what we're reduced to now? Nobody gives a shit if you don't want a phone with more features. Now fuck off.

    1. Re:What a worthless fucking post. by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      While I would formulate the sentence a bit different, I agree with you though. What's next, aunt Sally posting about Windows having too many features?

  35. Money saver by Clsid · · Score: 1

    Sure you can save money by using a dumb phone, but I work in construction and I always find an use to having a camera with me, sending those pictures by e-mail, as well as being able to check e-mail, checking construction materials specifications on-site, having Excel budget sheets with me, payroll info. Let's not forget how effective SMS/Blackberry Messenger/WhatsApp can be for an organization to pass information along very quick, or in a bank where they don't allow people to talk over a cellphone.

    In short, I'm a sucker for smartphones since they have really made my job way more efficient, and I like the feeling of having all my information whenever I want to. Oh, and for me, the phone replaced the laptop for movie watching on long trips.

    1. Re:Money saver by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You can't talk on a cell phone in a bank? Really? Is that a fact? Never heard that before.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:Money saver by Clsid · · Score: 1

      You'll be surprised what you find once you go out of the borders of the US of A. Not every country has the same rules.

    3. Re:Money saver by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Because you can use sms? Works wonders. Here a security guard will escort you out of the bank if you start talking over the phone.

    4. Re:Money saver by petman · · Score: 1

      Where I live practically all banks have "no mobile phone" signs, usually posted on the entrance door.

  36. Things I don't need: continued by spacepimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A car. I could quit my job, or bike to work and arrive a sweaty mess, or move to a city, or take mass transit for an hour vs 25 minutes of commute. A radio. Music is a luxury nothing more. A home phone. People can write letters like we used to did in my days as a kid. A TV. News is only entertainment and the entertainment isn't even entertaining. Electric lights. Candles work, and who needs to be up after dark falls? Plumbing. There's an outhouse down the block. None of these are necessities, unless you want to have a career. Personally my Job mandates I have a smartphone. (IT). So I need one, as without one, I wouldn't be able to afford food, shelter and clothing right now. Past that there is no place for a Smart Phone on Maslow's hierarchy of needs unless it helps to achieve one or more of them. A cell phone is not very useful when what you need is clean drinking water, but then again not much is.

    1. Re:Things I don't need: continued by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that we're talking about why so MANY people don't need a smartphone, not whether it's a useful device for people who actually, truly need it. Personally, I'm glad for the rise of smartphones, just not for the douchebags who chumble around acting smug because they bought a piece of technology that they don't use to much effect anyway.

      --
      -
    2. Re:Things I don't need: continued by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      I got rid of my car a year ago. I ride my bike to work most days and take a shower at the office. Or if it's snowing I'll take the bus, which is much less expensive than driving a car, and unlike driving isn't a total waste of time - I can read a book or the paper rather than sitting there fuming at other drivers. I also don't have a smart phone. I really really want one, but I don't need one and I don't want the extra expense.

      If you need a car or a smart phone for your job, those are good excuses for having such things. All I need for my job as a software developer is a dumb phone, some decent clothes, and some smarts.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    3. Re:Things I don't need: continued by ChinggisK · · Score: 1

      There's nothing you can do on a phone you can't do on a desktop.

      How about.. wait for it...

      "Carry it with you everywhere"....?

  37. Do you really need a Freudian slip ? by billcopc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Replace "phone" with "vagina" in the summary, and bask in my glorious wisdom.

    Hey, I don't need expensive hoppy microbrews in my beer fridge, but that doesn't mean I'm going to replace my premium beer with cheap megaswill. If luddites are happy being luddites, good for THEM. Also, get the fuck off my internets.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Do you really need a Freudian slip ? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

      OK, I did that. So what is a 'smart vagina' as opposed to just a 'vagina'?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:Do you really need a Freudian slip ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Brunette.

    3. Re:Do you really need a Freudian slip ? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, I did that. So what is a 'smart vagina' as opposed to just a 'vagina'?

      It only accepts incoming connections from trusted sources?

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:Do you really need a Freudian slip ? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a mod point. Well done, AC.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. How do you spend $4 a month? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

    How do you spend only $4 a month?

    For that price, I might actually get a cell phone.

    1. Re:How do you spend $4 a month? by JoelKatz · · Score: 1

      I spent $0/month on my dumb phone. The phone was provided by my employer. My wife bought me an Android phone for my birthday a month ago -- two year contract, $200 or so, it seemed kind of silly to me but she couldn't think of anything else to get me. I'd had the same phone for 8 years.

      If you had asked me a month ago, I would have sworn I didn't need a smart phone, but it's now indispensable. It has already paid for itself in two ways. One small one -- no more yearly GPS updates. And one big one -- catching an email before a three hour drive allowed me to make a meeting that I otherwise would have missed. It was a good meeting.

  39. Re:TP by jdastrup · · Score: 1

    Yes, you do.

  40. The secret is you can never go back... by joshamania · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I did the dumb phone thing for quite a while a couple of years back. I'm not a huge phone talker and i'd use a couple hundred minutes a month. I bought a tracphone for $20 and loaded minutes on it at the rate of about $20-30 a month. If I lost the phone...who cares?

    But when I got my current phone...Verizon/Incredible...can't go back. $120 a month easy...I'm getting murdered on that...my biggest single monthly expense. I'll still pay. I'm a sucker, but it just keeps doing way cool shit. This morning I used google navigate to get to a service call at a client i'd never visited. When I pulled into their parking lot, I look down at my phone and there's a picture of g street view of exactly what I'm looking at out the windshield of my car. It was kinda surreal. And worth every penny.

    1. Re:The secret is you can never go back... by tooslickvan · · Score: 1

      $120 a month to look at a picture of what you're already looking at through the windshield?

    2. Re:The secret is you can never go back... by joshamania · · Score: 1

      You folks obviously don't get it, so by all means, keep on keepin' on.

  41. PDA first, phone second by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

    I've gotten used to carrying a PDA - starting with various Palms (V, Z72, TX, and others I'm forgetting), then a Nokia N800, and finally an Android phone. I don't need a good cell phone - I have a much more ergonomic phone at my desk and a decent landline (VOIP wholesale, very cheap) at home, so I really only need a cell phone for emergencies and occasional use. For me, having a smartphone allows me to carry one less device in my pocket.

    The main problem is the cell plan. I'm on an IBM employee plan with AT&T, which gives my wife and I a good discount. Even so, it's too expensive for the amount of use we have - and we don't have data or texting. When our current contract with AT&T is up, I'm looking forward to switching to a carrier - such as Ting or Republic Wireless - that's better suited for our usage patterns. We'll be able to get voice, data and texting for less money than we're spending for voice alone right now.

  42. the "need" comes with the usage by NoZart · · Score: 1

    i opposed smartphones for a long time. I got my first one last year. After choking it with silly apps in the first few weeks, some applications condensed out of it which i do not want to live without anymore. I now have a fake tilt shift cam, a nice reminder system, a remote for my HTPC, a mobile music player and a webbrowser on the go in one device....

    Smartphones vs. featurephones are about the same as color TV vs. monochrome TV: sure you don't need it, but after a while you do not want the "old" tech anymore.:

  43. Best compromise: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A simple android phone without a data plan is a very nice compromise.

    At home using WiFi it synchs with gmail contacts and calender. Thus even on the road all the contact info is available. Reminders and alarm clocks with multiple alarms work. Cheap 5$ apps like Co-Pilot gives you some GPS functionality, directions etc. (Co-Pilot takes a while to get find the satellite and calculate current position, after that it is not too bad). Some simple games, good storage for lots of music and photos etc.

    But the best feature is the Wi-fi calling. Most cell companies charge you air-time minutes even if you use the Wi-Fi calling. But that is home base minutes. Not roaming, not interntional. So if you are on a cruise ship or a foreign country with cyber cafe, you can save a bundle on international calls. Cruise ships typically charge 50$ for internet vs $3.95 a minute for cell phone call. International roaming is outrageous. Most foreign cyber cafes give you internet access at about 1$ per hour.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Best compromise: by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      "Cheap 5$ apps like Co-Pilot gives you some GPS functionality, directions etc. (Co-Pilot takes a while to get find the satellite and calculate current position, after that it is not too bad)."

      Copilot is one of the "premium" navigation apps on Android - roughly on the same level as Navigon or Aura... it's only recently that they dropped the price of their US app so low. And getting a GPS fix is no faster or slower in any Android app...

      Interesting that a low price would cause you to think it's somehow inferior...

    2. Re:Best compromise: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Copilot is probably one of the best apps in android. But still the android based GPS does not have the same level of quality as the stand alone GPS devices like Garmin.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:Best compromise: by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      You still have to pay extra money (through skype for example) to call a landline or cell over the internet, unless you're using google chat to call the US.

  44. camera, putty, mp3 player by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

    I need a camera and an MP3 player and I need putty so that I can idle on IRC anywhere, any time. My phone happens to do all of those things, meaning I only need my keys and my wallet in addition when I go anywhere. Anywhere, except space and deep underground since it also has GPS. I can for example listen to internet radio in the wilderness of Lapland if I just climb a mountain with a view.

    I think the issue here is whether or not you know how to utilize your smart-phone effectively. Obviously if you're in the Lapland wilderness you should should be listening to the profound silence and not the latest Minecraft webcast.
    You can use your smart-phone for reading bar codes and all those fancy web things. When HTML5 and geo-awareness finds its killer app, it'll be like you have a new telepathic sense of your surroundings.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
    1. Re:camera, putty, mp3 player by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Anywhere, except space and deep underground since it also has GPS.

      What software do you use that keeps the maps on the phone, instead of downloading as needed? Or that "anywhere" is anywhere with 3G?

    2. Re:camera, putty, mp3 player by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Maemo mapper on the Nokia allows the download of maps before hand and will store them. I've used it and it works fine. You can store the entire US if you have enough memory.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    3. Re:camera, putty, mp3 player by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      What software do you use that keeps the maps on the phone, instead of downloading as needed? Or that "anywhere" is anywhere with 3G?

      Ovi maps from Nokia can store the maps on the phone I believe.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  45. Dumbphone by Muramas95 · · Score: 1

    I call them Dumb-phones

  46. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone - wait for it - without a contract. It's on AT&T's GoPhone style pay as you go service.

    So once you get past the initial hardware, which then comes down to a typical hardware decision, I get all the fun of a smartphone in places with wifi (work and McDonalds!) but all the low expenses of a prepaid-as-you-go plan.

    $100 in phone service lasts me about 4 months.

    That's the direction I've been figuring I'd go. T-mobile allows you to have a smart phone and buy a week or month of connectivity as you go, sans contract. It looks attractive.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  47. Need? Yup. by miltonw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Major freeway tie-up when I needed to catch a plane. Smartphone got me there.
    Big problem at work and not near home or work. Smartphone to VPN, ssh and solve it quickly.
    200 passwords to keep track of. Smartphone does it.

    Dumbphone wouldn't work for any of that.

  48. No, but... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to have one but can't afford one! Perhaps Roblimo could be so kinds as to buy me one. No?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:No, but... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Gah! I meant 'kind'.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  49. Some need a phone, some a PDA, some (me) both by bradgoodman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've been using PDAs probably longer than I've been carrying around a mobile phone. For me, my phone is a PDA first, and a phone second. (Far second). I'd even catagorize it as a "communications device" far above a "telephone" - after all, I use email, web, SMS and even Facebook more than I use the voice-telephone.

    So if you want to argue that "people don't need smartphones" - I find it kind of nonsensical. If I had to give-up one major feature of my "smartphone", it would probably be the "telephone" piece. If I were to rate in order of importance what I use my iPhone for, I'd have to say:

    - Calendar (Shared and synced)

    - Notes (Everything from gift ideas, to what kind of light bulbs I have in my house. Some of my notes I've been maintaining and using for YEARS).

    - Email

    - SMS

    - GPS

    - Camera

    - Games & Entertainment (Yeah - hate to say it - but I kill a LOT of spare time with my iPhone!)

    - Facebook

    - Mobile Web (Hate to admit it, but the "experience" is still lousy on a small screen)

    - Misc. productivity apps

    Oh yea...and..

    - Telephone

    1. Re:Some need a phone, some a PDA, some (me) both by winspear · · Score: 1

      Then you should get an ipod like device. Why the hell do you need a smart PHONE when you are not going to use it as a phone?

    2. Re:Some need a phone, some a PDA, some (me) both by bradgoodman · · Score: 1

      On the (somewhat infrequent) times I used voice - I still do need it. I also can't get SMS, email or Web - away from a WiFi access point - with an iPod.

  50. Re:Nobody calls roblimo... by jdastrup · · Score: 1

    Virgin Mobile has a plan for $20 every three months. Hard to find on their website, but it's there. More than $4 (was he talking $USD?), but less than $10.

  51. Not necessarily by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone 4 because my work provides it. I'm on call, and I can usually handle tricky situations remotely, even if I'm not someplace that has a computer I can use. Before I got placed on call, I used a Tracfone. We had one for me, my wife, and our two kids. We had a family plan that only cost us $30 a month, and if the kids wanted more talk time, they could pay $10 to get 100 minutes, but that was their responsibility, so I never had to face overage charges.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  52. Wish this comparison would stop by Demoknight · · Score: 1

    They are advanced multipurpose computers with 4" touchscreens.

    "phones" pshhh

  53. Opposite by jbov · · Score: 1

    I'm the opposite. I loathe smart phones. I always have a notebook and Internet access.

    However, it isn't long before someone complains that they can't post to their blog, or upload photos to their forum, or remove items from their cart, etc... from their "smart phone". Now I need them just to see how web apps function on them. I long for the days when my only worry was IE compatibility.

  54. Sometimes it saves money and frustration by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a choice: Buy a $200 bagpipe tuner (the cheap chromatic tuners are all equal tempered, and thus don't work for just-tempered instruments like the great highland bagpipe), and a ~$100 GPS and a $100 ipod and a $20 metronome... or buy one android phone, install gStrings, mobile metronome and PowerAmp (under $10 total) and get more total functionality for the same overall price. That's ignoring the phone aspect, obviously. And the camera. And the e-mail. And the text messaging with a full dvorak keyboard. And the mobile web browser...

    --
    Not a sentence!
    1. Re:Sometimes it saves money and frustration by m50d · · Score: 1

      How did you get dvorak? If I could put my transformer keyboard into dvorak my life would be complete.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Sometimes it saves money and frustration by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Anysoft keyboard allows different layouts. It's software keyboard only AFAIK, but I don't like moving parts in expensive handheld devices so I don't have a hardware keyboard. It's much easier to hunt & peck on than qwerty.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Sometimes it saves money and frustration by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      HA!
      On a more serious note, there are some reasons for the bad tuning of most bagpipes people hear.
      First is that many pipers people hear are soloists. Also known as the pipers who failed the band audition.
      Second is that the pipes use just temperament, not equal temperament, and so won't be in tune with modern instruments. Or with modern electronic tuners. So if you mix the pipes with other instruments you have to tune them differently, and even if you don't you can't use most electronic tuners. The ones you can use are over $200.
      Third, bagpipe A is somewhere above Bb, around 460-480hz. You need to buy a special chanter (the bit that plays the melody notes) to play at A=440hz. When playing with another instrument this can easily lead to an "out of tune" sound.
      Fourth, the pipe plays in D major, B minor, or A mixolydian. That last one is the weird one, and it's pretty common. If it were A major the G would be G#, but instead it's G-natural. G# would be very discordant with the drones, which play A. This makes the G sound odd, but it's a 7th and isn't used that often. The pipes were originally a pentatonic instrument, music using non-pentatonic modes tends to sound strange.
      Finally, you have to blow perfectly steadily and move the tuning slides without looking. It's not that hard to do, but some people mess it up. And if you can't blow steadily enough to tune your pipes, you certainly can't blow steadily enough to play them.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    4. Re:Sometimes it saves money and frustration by hankwang · · Score: 1

      I tried Dvorak on my htc Android phone, but I didn't feel that it served much of a purpose when not touch typing. But more importantly, there was no text prediction nor support for long-press special characters like in the native htc keyboard.

      (posting this from my phone, via Avantslash to make slashdot smartphone-friendly)

    5. Re:Sometimes it saves money and frustration by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Hmm, AnySoft supports text prediction and special characters via long-press. As for touch typing, I can't touch type on a phone keyboard. Even with a hardware keyboard it's too small to fit my hands properly, so I end up hunt & pecking anyway. May as well use a software keyboard that can be a bit easier to find the letters on.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  55. Define "need" by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Can I live without a smartphone? Yep, I did so untill some two months ago. I can live without any kind of phone too.

    Did my life improve after I brought a smartphone? Yep. I still didn't need maps, but accessing my bank anywhere, and having some games for my daughter are usefull. Also, it does thetering, so all the problems with 3G modems and non-standard carrier authentication on Linux are gone.

    Anyway, my monthly bill is still under $4. It did increase a bit after I brought the phone, because sometimes I use 3G, but not that much. (Or are you one of those people that get the phone for "free" and them pay for it for the rest of you life?)

  56. I hate pieces like this. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    Do you need it? No.

    Guess what? You don't need that "dumb" phone either.
    Nor that computer you used to write this.

    All you "need" is food and water, everything else is just gravy.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:I hate pieces like this. by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      I need gravy.

  57. Do You Really Need a Phone? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

    Getting rid of your phone will save even more money!

  58. Do you really need a phone? by Rix · · Score: 1

    Frankly I'd be happy to drop the phone part of my smartphone. If you want to talk to me, why don't we go have coffee somewhere? If you need to send me a quick message, use SMS or email. That way I'll get it even if I'm driving or pooping or whatever.

  59. Re:TP by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

    People that know you - family, friends, work colleagues - need you to have and use toilet paper.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  60. I can't afford to change my plan by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    I have a 10 old retention plan from Sprint that's too good to replace. I get 2500 anytime minutes shared among 5 phones (in 4 different area codes), nights and weekends starting at 7 PM, unlimited long distance, unlimited phone to phone minutes, unlimited texting, unlimited 3G data pack, unlimited photo pack, and an Airave hot spot-all for 110 dollars a month, including all taxes and fees. To change my plan so I could use a smart phone would at least double my monthly cost, si I have the smartest dumb phone I can have, an LG Rumour Touch.

  61. Cheap cellular cost? by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

    Where did you get such a cheap cellular plan? I hardly make any calls, but my bare-bones prepaid phone plan costs more than $4 a month. In the US, the cheapest I found is T-Mobile To Go, which charges about 10 cents a minute if you buy $100. Since the minutes last at most a year, the minimum you have to pay is about more than $8 a month.

  62. Re:Back to the cave! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > And if you follow through with your argument you could be as happy living in a cave hunting and fishing.

    So you've heard of Ted Nugent then?

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  63. For me by joh · · Score: 1

    a smartphone has proven to save lots of time I would otherwise sit at an awful computer instead, chained to a keyboard and a desk and a mouse or a touchpad, sitting on a chair. It gives me freedom from computers (to a certain extent) and/or from finding a chair and a surface to set up my laptop. And this is a good thing.

    Of course you also may say you don't need a computer or the Internet or hot water or anything than water to drink. Yes, no doubt. What you need is air, water, food and just enough clothing not to freeze to death. Everything else is luxury. But it's not bad just because it's luxury.

    Nothing against minimalism, but these days I would rather give up my computer(s) than my smartphone (as long as I can also keep a bluetooth keyboard ;-)

  64. I hate being on a leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I was a boy...

    Yes, Grandpop...

    Phone numbers were buildings, and now they are people...I don't like it much that I can be reached anytime. I have a pay-as-you-go cell phone that I never take out of the car.

  65. I'm meeting him halfway by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    I have a smart phone, and a damn good one (Samsung Galaxy Note, 5.3" screen and pretty much best CPU, GPU, Battery...), but no data plan for it. So I get a very low monthly bill, and a nice toy on which to read, play, listen to music, watch videos... WIfi is prett much everuwhere I go, and when there's no wifi, I've got a lot of preloaded content anyway.
    Best of both worlds ! Of course, I'm not a mail/IM/FB/Twitter addict.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  66. You also don't really need X, Y or Z by alta · · Score: 2

    No you don't need a smart phone. You also don't need a computer, car, TV, ipod.

    For that matter you don't need shoes, a toothbush, medecine or soap.... but damn if they don't make life easier.

    Now, for MY job on the other hand, I need this phone. I'm expected to carry this phone and be this 'in touch' at all times. If I'm not, they'll find someone who will. So don't tell me I can do without when responding to email on a timely basis is part of my job.

    Thanks

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  67. Odd super-villain name by bwintx · · Score: 1
    Off-topic, but from TFA:

    Do you catch my meaning? Do you get my drift? I use my cell phone to talk. In an emergency, like when evil Dr. Smegma throws me in a cell and is listening to me but can't see me, I might send a "HELP!" message. Or tweet something like, "Dr. Smegma has captured me. How droll!"

    Umm, OK. Getting slightly grossed out just thinking at what capabilities a super-villain named "Dr. Smegma" might have... That aside, TFA's author has a number of good points (at least given his particular perspective), albeit few if any he could sell to most individuals under 35 years of age.

    --
    Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
  68. Needs differ. Duh. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ride the bus to and from work every day. I could carry a dumb phone, plus an mp3 player, plus a netbook, I suppose... but instead I have an original Droid, and it gets all that done in a much smaller and more convenient package, along with GPS navigation, flash drive file transport, encrypted password wallet, and a cheap camera.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 3, Informative

      I ride the bus to and from work every day. I could carry a dumb phone, plus an mp3 player, plus a netbook, I suppose... but instead I have an original Droid, and it gets all that done in a much smaller and more convenient package, along with GPS navigation, flash drive file transport, encrypted password wallet, and a cheap camera.

      I carry a dumb phone and have half the features you mention even on that... specifically mp3 player (yes, my dumb phone does play mp3s), flash drive file transport, and cheap camera.

      The only catch is that I need to have a Micro SD card for storage and a USB cable A normal to B mini to transfer files off.... which incidentally comes with the phone as part of its charging cable.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by simplu · · Score: 2

      You can try to read a book. A real book. A fiction book. You will be surprised.

      --
      L.
    3. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      if you need GPS nav while on the bus, you may want to consider another driver

    4. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can try to read a book. A real book. A fiction book.

      Holy crap! I have never in my life done that before! I had no idea such a thing was even possible!

      (Or, just maybe I load them onto my phone. And save the dead-tree stuff for bedside at home.)

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    5. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by syousef · · Score: 1

      I ride the bus to and from work every day. I could carry a dumb phone, plus an mp3 player, plus a netbook, I suppose... but instead I have an original Droid, and it gets all that done in a much smaller and more convenient package, along with GPS navigation, flash drive file transport, encrypted password wallet, and a cheap camera.

      You left out web browser, ebook reader, games platform, note taking took, guitar tuner, noise level meter, planetarium, spirit level, and many many many more. It easily replaces the Palm pilot I've been carrying for years.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      You can try to read a book. A real book. A fiction book. You will be surprised.

      You're right, I could try reading a book on the bus. I don't think the person next to me would appreciate it when I vomit on them, though.

    7. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for all of those links to bookstores all at once. I'd never heard of a couple of them. :D

    8. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I'll just put this, ahem, bookmark here for later.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    9. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by houghi · · Score: 2

      Let's see about all these individual items.
      GPS? I know where I live and I know where I work, so I do not need a GPS for that. The few times I do not know the way, I phone the people and ask for directions.
      I have a computer at work and a computer at home. The time in between I do not need one.
      Camera? There is nothing as boring as what happens to me. I do not have the urge to have everything that happens to me in some sort of remembrance of my past, If people are interested in it THEY can bring a camera. I don't care.
      As I do not mix work and private, there is no reason for me to drag stuff on a flash drive from and to the office/home.
      Same reason not to have a password walled.

      All I need is a phone to send SMSses and call. The majority of those are about meeting up some place so we can talk in person. The important people know that my phone is off during work. Leave a message or send an SMS and we will meet in person.

      So yeah, it is great to have a device that does everything. Unfortunately for the producer I do not need any of it. So I buy just about the cheapest phone I can get and I get annoyed because it can do so much stuff that I do not want.

      For me it is like buying a PC with Windows preinstalled. It might be great for many people, but I am paying for shit I do not want.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by tqk · · Score: 1

      Somebody, please mod the good Dr. up. This post could make my accursed dumb phone useful.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      You can try to read a book. A real book. A fiction book. You will be surprised.

      A smart phone can provide more than just entertainment. A fiction book? maybe, but any non-entertainment benefit would be secondary at best.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    12. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what point you are making.

      So you dont need a smartphone. Then dont buy one. No one is forcing you to.

      Did I miss something?

      I'm pretty sure no one is claiming that everyone needs a smart phone. Just like not everyone needs anything that isn't food, clothing and shelter.

      So what you're really saying is that you do not WANT a smartphone. And what everyone else is saying is that they DO want one, and they find them useful.

      Everyone wins - yay!

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    13. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      kinda suck to read on a phone tho.
      - bright screen hurt my eyes over time
      - low battery (aka you can't read the whole book before its dead)
      - small screen
      - they're often not cheaper

      thus i still enjoy real books personally.

    14. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      I live in the woods and eat my own boogers you insensitive consumerist clod.

      \

    15. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Well, then that's not a dumb phone but a feature phone.

    16. Re:Needs differ. Duh. by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Using metropolitan public transport is infinitely easier with a GPS-enabled phone. Not only does it tell you where to go and which bus to take, but it also has live bus positions to recommend the fastest route to your destination. This feature alone probably saves me more time than any other kind of smartphone functionality.

  69. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    So the only way to pay full cost for the phone upfront so as to avoid that 30+% effective interest rate (that results from spreading its costs over two years on your cell phone bill) is to use as pay-as-you-go plan?

    Does it cover web/texting?

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  70. It depends .... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    When our kids started school my wife got a beeper (pager) so she could be reached when she wasn't home in an emergency. Eventually ma bell wouldn't renew the service and Motorola wouldn't replace/repair the pagers anymore so we ended up with TracFone. My wife liked the idea of having the phone in the car in case something happened (she once did get a flat on I95 and called AAA for help). Now the kids are in HS and will start College next year. They are both iPod/iPad geeks. So we moved them from TracFone to AT&T 'droid phones. There are good uses for a smart phone for students, and some people like them to shop with (compare the competitor's web site from the store and get the manager to match or beat their prices). I wouldn't go overboard with a data plan though, I don't need to download movies to watch on a phone (and wouldn't want the kids to either). The web on a phone is like having an encyclopedia, an atlas, and lots of other data bases in your pocket. Remote control applications are endless. Still, for most of us all we need is a gd phone.

  71. I don't have a smartphone by Chang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got a blackberry :-(

    1. Re:I don't have a smartphone by broseidon · · Score: 1

      Ahh Blackberry... You know, I almost miss mine. Not smart, but not quite dumb either... just treading water in the "No Child Left Behind" initiative.

  72. Freedom by SuperCharlie · · Score: 2

    I played the "keep up with the latest phone" game for a long time and then quit cold turkey. After the initial withdrawals.. yes there are real withdrawals, it is amazing how free you feel.. imagine the day you turned in that company beeper.. its like that freedom but 24/7. The addicted will squeel about all manners of why they need them.. For me, it was like shedding shackles.

    1. Re:Freedom by sauge · · Score: 1

      It's why I go backpacking in signal free zones. Freedom!

  73. Makes parenting much easier, and better by Pausanias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't tell you the number of times my iPhone has allowed me to take the kids to the playground while tending to work stuff. The kids can play, and I can spend 90% of the time playing with them, and 10% answering emails.

    The alternative would have been the kids stay home and don't get a workout.

    Do I *need* a smartphone? No. But has it saved time enough for everyone in my family to make it worthwhile, and improved family life? Yes. absolutely.

    1. Re:Makes parenting much easier, and better by don.g · · Score: 1

      The other thing you could get is a work-life balance. I hear there are jobs where you don't have to answer emails out of work hours. I know they exist, because I have one -- but then I'm one of those weird people who voluntarily takes a pay cut in order to not work Mondays.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    2. Re:Makes parenting much easier, and better by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Who says he wasn't at work? Independent consulting does have its perks, including taking your kids to the park, or going out to play golf, on a nice afternoon.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Makes parenting much easier, and better by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Mobile device for a mobile need.

      I guess the idea is that people don't have mobile needs yet purchase expensive smart phones to use while they are sitting next to their computer.

  74. Space savings by EliSowash · · Score: 1

    I noticed the author said he was a limo driver. This means he has a place to keep a camcorder, laptop, music player, briefcase, etc. I got a smartphone because carrying a bunch of electronics was a pain. All those things he carries are in my phone, which is in my front pocket.

  75. synchronized contact and calendar by marcovje · · Score: 1

    An externally synchronized contact and calendar would be enough. The rest is fluff.

  76. Why do I need a portable computer by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    ... if I never leave my mom's basement and the glow of my really computer? Hell, without any friends, I only really need a phone to tell my mom to make me more hot pockets.

  77. Re:Nobody calls roblimo... by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

    Beg to differ.
    Tmobile (http://prepaid-phones.t-mobile.com/pay-as-you-go-plans) provides a $10, 30 min prepaid plan where the minutes are good for 3 months - that's $3.33 / mo. They used to offer a $100, 1000 minute prepaid plan where the minutes never expired - perhaps the parent is still on that plan?

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
  78. Smart? by rabenja · · Score: 1

    I am in the technology field. I have an iPad, an iPod and an Android. I use them all (not so much the iPod). But having grown up where there was no TV, no radio, no telephones (except one for the whole community), my POV is that technology like smart phones significantly modifies behavior. People tend to get trained by the technology and lose sight of the practical use cases which in most cases are questionable. For instance, I have seen a group of teenagers sitting together at a table, each one busy texting and no one talking. How many times have you seen someone with a cell phone glued to his ear while attempting to do something else? In my case, I am required to be available pretty much 24/7 and to have access to the servers but the reality is that rarely happens. It annoys me in the extreme when I am having a conversation with someone and their cell phone rings or notifies him/her of a message and the conversation is dropped in favor of the intrusion. The behavior modification is analogous to a dog leash. The main point being: is there often anything so important that it could not wait a few minutes or an hour or a day or more? The portable technology tends to own you

  79. It's not a phone by zaax · · Score: 1

    I don't know why people call these palm computers a phone, its only a small part of its function. Its a camera, a mp3 player, a picture store, a video camera, word processor, to name a very few. Before this all these function were carried out by other machines which were often not very portable or another human.

    1. Re:It's not a phone by petman · · Score: 1

      The reason it's call a phone is this:
      I have a phone. This is it (I point to my Samsung Galaxy S II). You say this is not a phone? Then I don't have a phone...? But I have a phone number. People call me on this number and I answer on this (again I point to my Samsung Galaxy S II). I also make phone calls with it. So this is a phone. Of course, it's more than phone. Let's just call it a smartphone.

  80. I have PCs everywhere, so no need. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    PCs at work, PC in my home workshop, notebook by my recliner from which I'm posting, etc mean I don't use the features on my "semi-smart" phone or care they exist.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  81. $4 per month!? by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Never mind whether or not you really need a smartphone (although I think most people do NOT need one), I want to know how you get cellphone service for $4 per month?

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:$4 per month!? by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you don't put at least a certain amount of money into your account every month, every 3 months, or every 12 months (depending on the carrier), your service gets suspended even if you have a positive balance in your account.

  82. Re:TP by lucm · · Score: 1

    People that know you - family, friends, work colleagues - need you to have and use toilet paper.

    He does not need toilet paper. He needs access to toilet paper, which is totally different. I know a guy who "trained" himself to have a bathroom schedule that matches his work schedule, so he never buys toilet paper since he needs it only at the office (well mostly).

    There are also alternative lifestyles where some people will do without toilet paper, provided that they have access to a shower...

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  83. four dollars a month? by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

    How do I get a cell plan for four dollars a month on average?!

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  84. Nope by Secret+Agent+Man · · Score: 1

    I'll cling to my prepaid cell until it's pried from my cold dead etc. Not saying having a smartphone is bad: It would be quite convenient in fact. However, I'm saving a bundle by not converting to the Dark Side, and I plan on riding this ride for as long as possible.

  85. Dumb Phone + Pocket Computer + Hotspot by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    What I really want is a dumb phone that is just a dumb phone, a pocket computer that is completely mine to control (basically an iPod Touch without the "Obey Apple" stuff) and a hotspot.

    I'm close -- I have the hotspot, the iPod Touch (though not rooted), and carry a Linux laptop. My phone is an Android G1 that has been so abused and so rarely updated that it is basically a dumb phone now.

    Ultimately my point is the same one I made to my brother back in 1999 when he was considering a Palm 7 (or whatever the one was that had network connectivity): Convergence is not for everyone. It may work for the average knuckle-dragger who only needs the 80% heart-of-the-market functionality, or the hipster who worries about having too many devices in his pockets ruining the line of his doofus-wear, but anyone who wants a high-functioning device will typically be better served by a larger number of more specialized devices.

    The attendant upside is that you can replace individual components. For example; keep the pocket computer and hotspot, get a new dumb phone for under $50 pay-as-you-go.

  86. New problem, finding good dumb phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I dare you to try and find a good dumb phone... they do not exist! The market needs a simple phone that is well designed, I'll call it the "iPhone Nano"

  87. Need? No. by kelarius · · Score: 1

    Want? YES. I don't need my smartphone, I don't do much actual work from it, but I enjoy having it alot, it's just a toy but who doesn't like toys. It's worth the cost to me for that reason alone.

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
  88. Plain phone fits me: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    Money isn't why I don't have a smart phone. I could easily afford it.

    I just don't normally have a great need or want to be available at all times. My job doesn't really need it, either. I use a tracfone that I leave shut off most of the time. It's there to give me 911 access, and let me check voicemail from time to time.

    Yes, it sometimes would be nice to have mobile access to google or wikipedia, but it's rarely something I need "right then".

    Most of my friends have smart phones, it fits them and their lifestyle and that's great.

    I'll somehow survive not having 24/7 access to Angry Birds. ;)

  89. occasionally by DaveGod · · Score: 1

    I would be fine with the $10 "pay as you go" (no monthly plan) phone I picked up as a spare. In many respects it's a better phone: battery life is probably measured in weeks, it gets a great signal, it's smaller/lighter and the cost means minimal concern from losing or damaging it. I'd save quite a chunk of money.

    But about once a month I do need a smartphone. Or at least, I need satnav and the company pool car does not have it. Sure I could use the map under the seat but I don't really know the out-of-town geography very well and the relative convenience of the "satnav" isn't far off equating to modern "necessities" like, say, a microwave. I've been... Temporarily out of position, in darkness, in the middle of nowhere and all it took to get back on track was pulling over and a quick look at my phone.

    Also nice to be able to get email, browse the web and maybe a bit of gaming if I'm waiting around somewhere. On a related note, is it me or do people seem suspicious of someone hanging around with no obvious distraction?

  90. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by lucm · · Score: 1

    So the only way to pay full cost for the phone upfront so as to avoid that 30+% effective interest rate (that results from spreading its costs over two years on your cell phone bill) is to use as pay-as-you-go plan?

    I always knew that freedom has a price tag, I just don't understand how the telcos managed to be on the receiving hand of that.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  91. When my contract is done... by sauge · · Score: 1

    The data portion is getting chucked. Half the price right there. I can do wi-fi and get by.

  92. Help Convert A Dumb Phone User: Price? by assertation · · Score: 1

    I'm of the same mindset as the author.

    However, over the past few weeks I've given myself permission to get a smart phone, eventhough I do not have a use for one.

    My problem is price.

    Maybe a slashdotter can help me out.

    I resisted getting a "dumb phone" for years as well until the pricing fit my needs. I keep it switched off in the glove compartment of car unless I need to meet someone somewhere. I use a prepaid service called pagepluscelluar.com. All I have to do is buy $10 worth of minutes every 3 months. Almost nothing is wasted.

    Is there a company offering similar pricing for a *data plan* for an android phone?

    If not, what is the cheapest prepaid or pay-as-you-go plan --- for the most modern android phones?

  93. Short answer by TxRv · · Score: 1

    You *need* food, water, shelter, air, and social interaction. Smart-phones, and anything else not on the list, are wants. Anything else, no matter how useful or important it is to you, is a want.

    1. Re:Short answer by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Not according to some posting to this thead. They would clearly DIE without their smartphones (and according to them those of us lacking one are already dead).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  94. No smart phones here by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    2 dumbphones, on VirginMobile PAYG - $25month total. Maybe 45minutes a month use on mine.
    1. We don't go out a whole lot. No need to check email or websites on the go. When we do go out, generally it is with friends, and not dicking around on the phone.
    2. Cannot have phones at work. I can't even bring it into the building, lest the screeching box at the entrance rats me out.
    3. She can't be on the phone at work (retail)
    4. So either I'm at work with full internet access, or I'm at home with full multiscreen, multi device access. She talks a LOT on the landline phone at home
    5. Short commutes - 15 minutes each way, spent driving, not checking email.
    6. Dedicated GPS in the cars. 1 time fee.

    For our usage patterns, smart phones with a data/text/unlimited minutes plans do not work and are far more expensive. I've run all the numbers, and even ditching the landline portion of the Verizon FiOS bundle and going cell only is way more expensive than what we have now.

    YMMV

  95. My answer is yes by kwark · · Score: 1

    Yes, I need a smartphone, but not for making calls (the phone app is the least used app on my device). I need the always on data connection for work, the smartphone replaces a bulky USB GSM modem. Though laptops got integrated GSM modems some time ago, a smartphone with a decent keyboard can replace a laptop in many cases and is a lot more portable.

  96. DO YOU REALLY NEED SLASHDOT... by mad+flyer · · Score: 2

    Not anymore it seems...

  97. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  98. Smartphone for $30/year by mmmmbeer · · Score: 1

    I have a Droid X for $30 per year on Page Plus Cellular. The down side is I had to pay full price for my phone, and I don't use mobile data. The up side is that, thanks to Google Voice and Sipdroid, I use my actual minutes so rarely that I can get by with only paying $30/year! They also have other plans that beat the big boys' plans hands down.

    Contracts are for chumps!

  99. Phone + iPod + Camera + Netbook + USB Modem or... by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

    A Droid X. It's replaced all of those devices for me. On rare occasions I will tether my old Eee 701 to the X but the vast majority of the time, the 4.3" screen is just fine. I had to wait until such a product existed to make the move, however. Big fingers and smaller phones just don't work. I use Swiftkey X which gives me a slightly larger keyboard and I would love to have an even bigger screen but the X has done the trick for me for a year or so now.

    Did I need all that stuff? Probably not, but I've certainly enjoyed it.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  100. Would multiply my bill by five by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm on a $7/mo "payLo" dumbphone plan from Virgin Mobile. The cheapest PAYG plan for smartphones from the same carrier is $35/mo, with more voice minutes in a month than I'll use in a year. Is there a cheaper option in the United States?

    1. Re:Would multiply my bill by five by Galestar · · Score: 1

      Im on pay as you go as in by the minute as I do not use that much time. Also I'm in Canada so I can't help you there.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Would multiply my bill by five by narcc · · Score: 2

      . Is there a cheaper option in the United States?

      +5 Funny

    3. Re:Would multiply my bill by five by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      PagePlus prepaid plan requires only a $10 recharge every 120 days.
      voice minutes are $0.10 or less
      uses the Verizon network

    4. Re:Would multiply my bill by five by KCWaldo · · Score: 1

      Tracfone has the ability to buy a $20 preloaded card that gives you 120 minutes and lasts for 90 days of service. The phones are $20-$30. I use them for my kids who only need them for emergencies. You can get more minutes for cheaper if you want also. They are one of the best I have found.

    5. Re:Would multiply my bill by five by Pow · · Score: 1

      Tracfone SIM cards only work in Tracfone phones.
      There are cheaper pay as you go GSM plans, for example Spotmobile ($0.10/min, min recharge $5 every 120 days, uses T-Mobile and AT&T networks).

  101. Need is NOT the Issue by Jhyrryl · · Score: 1

    This argument can be made for all kinds of technological conveniences, so what was the point of this "article" again?

    I don't technically need a car, or a TV or a computer, or even a refrigerator.

    But I can afford these things and like what they provide me. So why not?

    --
    Jhyrryl
  102. Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by Local+ID10T · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ancedote:

    My smart phone paid for itself the afternoon I accidentally misconfigured the firewall on the company's ecommerce server (which is in a colo several hours drive from me). Misconfigured as in blocked my own IP address instead of whitelisting it. I was able to download a SSH client, open a terminal session and revert the firewall settings from my phone.

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    1. Re:Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by neonKow · · Score: 2

      You could have also paid for web hosting or an SSH server online and gotten the same result. Or driven to a starbucks with your laptop. Possibly even reseting your router would have worked. Sure, since you had your phone, that helped, but if you hadn't had your phone, I'm sure you would have figured something else out pretty quickly.

    2. Re:Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Ancedote:

      My smart phone paid for itself the afternoon I accidentally misconfigured the firewall on the company's ecommerce server (which is in a colo several hours drive from me). Misconfigured as in blocked my own IP address instead of whitelisting it. I was able to download a SSH client, open a terminal session and revert the firewall settings from my phone.

      You allow SSH connections to your firewall from the world?

      I can't even reach our firewall from outside of our network without a VPN connection. If I locked myself out, I'd be completely locked out unless I was on site. (and hopefully I hadn't written the config to memory so I could have someone power cycle it)

    3. Re:Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by duguk · · Score: 1

      Ancedote:

      My smart phone paid for itself the afternoon I accidentally misconfigured the firewall on the company's ecommerce server (which is in a colo several hours drive from me). Misconfigured as in blocked my own IP address instead of whitelisting it. I was able to download a SSH client, open a terminal session and revert the firewall settings from my phone.

      Unnecessary. MidPSSH. That is all.

    4. Re:Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Ancedote:

      My smart phone paid for itself the afternoon I accidentally misconfigured the firewall on the company's ecommerce server (which is in a colo several hours drive from me). Misconfigured as in blocked my own IP address instead of whitelisting it. I was able to download a SSH client, open a terminal session and revert the firewall settings from my phone.

      You allow SSH connections to your firewall from the world?

      I can't even reach our firewall from outside of our network without a VPN connection. If I locked myself out, I'd be completely locked out unless I was on site. (and hopefully I hadn't written the config to memory so I could have someone power cycle it)

      LOL

      Theres a fine line between being smart with security and just creating more opportunities to shoot yourself in the foot.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      You allow SSH connections to your firewall from the world?

      I can't even reach our firewall from outside of our network without a VPN connection.

      And what exactly is securing your VPN connection, pixie dust?

      Or do I just misunderstand what is meant by "allowing connections to your firewall"?

      The VPN concentrator is a separate physical device (from a different vendor) - once I VPN in, *then* I need to use SSH to reach my firewall. So it takes two independent compromises to break in. With separate digital certificates needed for each device.

    6. Re:Sometimes it can be a job-saver. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Ahh, learn something new every day. Didn't know VPN hardware existed. Thanks. :)

      A year or so ago, our firewall and VPN device were the same, then we upgraded the firewall and are using the old firewall hardware (a pair of Cisco ASA's) as a dedicated VPN appliance.

      If I were buying one today, I'd probably go for one of the Juniper appliances.

  103. All I really NEED... by Zorque · · Score: 1

    ...is food, water, and sleep. Is it useful to have a smartphone? Yes, and bothering other people about theirs is a pretty obvious way for you to cope with feeling left behind for not having one.

    1. Re:All I really NEED... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And shelter.

      Of course, is need just base survival, or is need being part of the large tribe? is being accepted a need*?

      *hint: it is, no matter what the people on /. think.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  104. Like the people who refuse to join Facebook by snsh · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't trust a person who's never owned a smartphone to know what they're missing, any more than I would trust a person who refuses to join Facebook to understand what they're missing by refusing to join Facebook.

    http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s14e04-you-have-0-friends

    1. Re:Like the people who refuse to join Facebook by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust a person who's never owned a smartphone to know what they're missing, any more than I would trust a person who refuses to join Facebook to understand what they're missing by refusing to join Facebook.

      Yeah, but when a smoker with emphysema tells you that you shouldn't start smoking, listen to them. Yes, I just used smoking as a euphemism for Facebook.

    2. Re:Like the people who refuse to join Facebook by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And when a person with cancer tells you you should just use meditation to cure cancer, do you listen to them?

      How about we evaluate things on the merits?

      Facebook is a social tool. It isn't stupid or bad. How people use it is stupid or bad.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  105. Pay phones by tepples · · Score: 1

    Pay phones were far more common in 1991 than now. I carry a pay-as-you-go dumbphone because so many pay phones have been taken out of service.

  106. GPS by dominious · · Score: 1

    I moved in to a new city, and the GPS on my smartphone has helped me a lot of times to find my way. There. I do need a smartphone.

  107. It`s fun to read all the "reasons" by __aavqan3009 · · Score: 1

    People trying to justify their "need" for a smartphone. I am a FOH soundtech and travel the country. I have a Samsung Rugby with no data plan. I get my emails from my laptop at any hotel we stay at. I watch movies on the bus on my Laptop. I take pictures with a camera. I had an iPhone but gave it to my buddies kid because it never replaced ANYTHING that I owned. I could`nt even use it for music playback because the audio quality sucks. I have a phone to talk to people.

    1. Re:It`s fun to read all the "reasons" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Stuff cost more then it used to! Kids use curse words!

      Some of us have social lives.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  108. Wish I had both! by JumboMessiah · · Score: 1

    What I really want?

    I work on the move all the time and am very rarely in an office. My HTC Thunderbolt on Verizon 4G is one of the key factors that allows me to actually work _and_ get out and enjoy society. I've fielded calls and worked issues sitting in my car in a Target parking lot. But, that's what I do. I basically get paid to be available at a moments notice and provide support. I am happy with the trade off. I get great flexibility, and in return, give up some of my personal freedom.

    So, here's my biggest issue to date. Smart devices are getting too big to be truly portable. Try dragging a 4.5" device around the gym on an armband. Or find a place for it on a 5 mile run. I need to be connected, but sometimes only really need the old school phone/texting features. What I would love to see is carriers offer a single phone number that will route to multiple SIMs in multiple devices. That way, when i don't need the power and bulk of the Thunderbolt, I can grab a small and pocketable device instead.

    Perhaps Google voice can accommodate this? Anybody have any experience with it?

  109. Missing out on progress by thsths · · Score: 1

    7 years ago I paid quite a lot of money on a reasonably "dumb" phone. It had a small colour screen, could go online and show mobile web pages (badly), it would even provide tethered mobile internet (very badly). But it did have a nice calendar, a decent address book, and Opera Mini worked (again badly).

    Now I spent less money on a cheap Android, and it is great. I still spend around 1 buck prepaid per month, but I get a modest amount of free internet with it, just enough to use Google Talk on the move, to check out prices, or to upload a picture to Facebook. Android for the masses is what I have been waiting for. (And I am the first to admit that it has flaws and truck loads worth of bugs.)

  110. Well... need is a subjective term by emagery · · Score: 1

    I don't NEED it any more than I NEED anything else in live other than shelter and calories. That said, what I WANT is to get rid of the phone service and simply be able to take and leave voice messages via something more like an iPad... a mobile work-facilitating communications hub. I find it a false necessity to have to put down a gorram phone number on legal forms, etc... especially when, given the fact that I don't place or receive calls, even GOphones cost me on the order of $50 a minute since their minutes expire. My smartphone has been an invaluable resource to me, though, on many occasions... I just don't need the gorram minutes that I have to have to use the damn thing. And I'm not making it up at all when I say that I've lost 115 lbs through the use of an iphone app.

  111. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by Frenzied+Apathy · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone

    STOP! Gaaaahh! I can't believe he admitted that!

    --
    The cake is a lie.
  112. Amish... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Stuck with horse and buggies and suits them just fine. And I applaud their choice and convinction.

    But pardon me if I join the rest of the modern world and utilize and automated mobile vehicle for transit.

    Thx.

    1. Re:Amish... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the Amish use cell phones... and other technologies as well.

      There are some rules about it.

      IN a nut shell, if they feel it bring the community together, then its allowed, if its viewed as separating the community, then they don't allow it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Amish... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      My understanding living in PA near Lancaster area is that there are variations in Amish/Mennonite based on sects. Some stricter than others.

      Many allow cell phone use, but only in conjunction with business use.

      They allow motors, but not on wheels. A lot of it is more focused on maintaining community and a universal standard of living.

  113. Android pod touch by tepples · · Score: 2

    FYI, your "wifi-only smartphone" is called an iPod touch.

    The problem is that until very recently, Apple had a near monopoly on "Wi-Fi-only smartphones", or "PDAs" as they used to be called, and there weren't any Android counterparts the way there are to the iPhone. That changed a couple months ago when Samsung introduced the Galaxy Player.

    1. Re:Android pod touch by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that monopoly part. You can get a first gen android phone contract-free with a 32GB SD card for about 70 bucks cheaper than the equivalent ipod touch. It allows you to ditch the dumbphone too.

    2. Re:Android pod touch by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Thanks to you both for insightful commentary. :) The Republic Wireless link that someone mentioned below seem more useful, in that it's (once out of beta) a normal cell phone that prioritizes routing over wifi instead of cell networks. Then I'd only need 1 device instead of two.

      But, you're right: the Galaxy Player and iPod both perfectly fit the bill of "wifi only smart-device-that-can-phone". I just realized (from reading this thread, ironically) that I want one less than I thought. :D

    3. Re:Android pod touch by brusk · · Score: 1

      The problem is that until very recently, Apple had a near monopoly on "Wi-Fi-only smartphones", or "PDAs" as they used to be called, and there weren't any Android counterparts the way there are to the iPhone. That changed a couple months ago when Samsung introduced the Galaxy Player.

      Archos has made such devices for a while, though they're not as well known (or as highly polished) as the Galaxy Player.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
  114. I will go one better by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

    I save on my bill by simply not having a mobile phone. When I live my workplace i don't want to be bothered by work When I leave my home I want to get away from the phone. as far as other functionality that "Smart phones" bring If I need a map I use (wait for it) a Paper map! you can get nice State maps for free at state ran tourist info booths As far as browsing, email, calendering and all of these other features if I think I am going to need those while I am not close to my desk I grab my laptop bag I can do everything with it a smart phone can at a place with free wireless for the price of a cup of coffee and in the process have a Screen that is readable ad a useful keyboard.

  115. Instead of driving by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm tethered to a PC all day anyway, except when I'm driving

    If you took the bus instead of driving, would you have more chance to use a smartphone?

    1. Re:Instead of driving by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >If you took the bus instead of driving, would you have more chance to use a smartphone?

      No, then he would be able to just use a laptop :D

    2. Re:Instead of driving by tepples · · Score: 1

      As do I. I have a separate dumbphone and laptop because of smartphone data plan costs. It's just that some pundits have predicted that as tablets take over, laptops will become harder to get. For example, Dell recently stopped making 10" laptops.

  116. "...happy with a stupid phone..." by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Or with no cellphone at all.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  117. With payphones disappearing by tepples · · Score: 1

    I also do not need or have a dumb cell phone.

    With payphones disappearing, how do you call someone if you happen to need a ride?

    1. Re:With payphones disappearing by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      As amusing and timeless as the basement dweller meme is (and yes, even though that witty AC directed it at me, it still gave me a smile), I can honestly say:

      1 - My humble little home has no basement
      2 - I may not have myself surrounded by a bunch of so-called friends, but the small circle of friends I have is quite reliable and we are there for each other when needed. We all hang out together once a month or so and get caught up on what is happening in our humble lives, and none of us are all that interested in yakking for hours on end on the phone about every last little detail of our lives.
      3 - My nearest family is about 500 miles away, and I keep in touch with them via email and Facebook. I am visiting them at this moment, having completed the not so arduous trip in my reliable little Geo Metro an hour and a half ago. I typically do this trip twice or three times a year. But after my second oldest sister passed away end of May, just a couple weeks shy of her 45th birthday, I have determined to make this trip more frequently.
      4 - During the trip today, I was able to note that there were only a couple places along the way where I would be severely inconvenienced by not having a cell phone should an emergency come up, not significant enough to warrant a phone and the additional expense of the service that goes with it.
      5 - My landline runs $25 per month. And if sales ever got so bad that I had to start severely cutting corners, that would be one of the first things to go.
      6 - There is no 6.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  118. Phone Luddites & Careers by assertation · · Score: 2

    I wonder if the anti-smart phone as an unneeded expensive expense people are people with IT careers that have peaked or not.

    Are these people cutting edge IT folk still gaining standing in their tech careers or are they older people whose careers have plateaued, at least as far as their technology learning goes?

    I mean absolutely no disrespect.

    I am an older IT professional ( > 20 years old ) myself. I also think, from a purely rational and financial perspective smart phones are a bad idea.

    That is, from a rational & financial perspective.....purely.

    A few years ago I noticed my attitudes gravitating toward the conservative/anti-innovation side of things. I was becoming old in my thinking.

    I've been working on my attitude since then.

    I've been thinking about getting an android. Not to feel a need, but to avoid becoming the old crank who lives slightly out of the loop with everyone else, going on about how he doesn't need email, phones or cars. After all the pony express still delivers letters.

    I remember those people from my youth and my vanity will not let me become one of them.

    I grew up watching Star Trek and being a sci-fi fan, so I was kind of shocked when I noticed myself not running with technological change.

    1. Re:Phone Luddites & Careers by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I've been thinking about getting an android. Not to feel a need, but to avoid becoming the old crank who lives slightly out of the loop with everyone else, going on about how he doesn't need email, phones or cars. After all the pony express still delivers letters. I remember those people from my youth and my vanity will not let me become one of them.

      Don't you remember the groovy dads that would keep up with the hip lingo so that they'd be cool talking about radical and crispy stuff like skateboarding and rock and roll and sock hops?
      You get to be one or the other. I never felt sorry for the ones set in their ways; they knew what they liked and didn't bother with things they didn't want.

    2. Re:Phone Luddites & Careers by assertation · · Score: 1

      That is such a good point that I am glad you posted.

      I don't see things as dividing up like that though. The Mr. Brady's with fros were being something they are not.

      I see it as having an attitude open to change & innovation......and as deciding to be pointed to the future instead of being pointed to the past.

    3. Re:Phone Luddites & Careers by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I am an older IT professional ( > 20 years old ) myself."

      21 year old, the new old guy.
      Or did you mean you have been working for > 20 years as an IT professional*?

      As someone who has been working professionally since Reagan tried to turn the country into a wasteland covered in ice, I am the old guy. It sucks, but there you go.

      My smart phone saves me time AND money. So it's rational.

      If you atr active socially, then get one. If you sit at home in fromt og your computer, and never really want to leave, then don't get one.

      For me, it's been a value add for every aspect of my life. From GPS Nav, to 'Hey dad, what kind of snake is that?'
      Events are so easy to organize and find, I go out more often because of me cell phone.

      I was born for the internet. Just born years to soon.

      Once I saw some woof on sale, about 500 dollars worth for 80 bucks. My wife sent me a picture of a wall in my house from her phone to mine, I was able to determine if it was enough wood for shelves. Bought it, and 3 days latter I had wall length shelves for books and monies. That never would have happened otherwise.
      All the time.

      Star Trek isn't about technology, so don't be shocked.
      I grew up with Star Trek, and I"m shocked I have done it with a green chick!

      * gah, IT profession, I hate the term. It's like sayingf I work in a hospital. Vague and usually used by pope not doing the difficult work.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Phone Luddites & Careers by Synchblade · · Score: 1

      I would love a smartphone except for the $50+ monthly cost of service. My solution? Tracfone + Ipod Touch. Then again, I don't use the phone as often as some people probably would. And I don't really care about being different or obsolete at least in the way of cell phones. I mean, why were mobile phones created in the first place? To call people and talk to them.

    5. Re:Phone Luddites & Careers by ozzee · · Score: 1

      I got my first mobile phone in 1999. It was because the job required it. The very first day I had the phone, my car broke down and I the phone was a rather very convenient device.

      I was a phone luddite. I didn't want to be strung to the rest of the world by the hip. Dude, you can turn the phone off any time. I don't have to use it.

      Now, 11 years on. I have a Galaxy Nexus, I run My Tracks almost every day, I browse web sites, take photos and videos, do navigation and occasionally make a phone call.

      I get to do what I want to do better. Sweet!

  119. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone - wait for it - without a contract.

    I have been reading up on this and have been contemplating doing this to my phone when my contract is up. This is a sample article similar to the ones I have read:

    http://modmyi.com/forums/t/754109-iphone-gophone.html

    Does this work well? Did you run into any issues?

  120. Re:Value of a Smart Phone by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

    you must not have paid much for your smart phone....

  121. There is no real economic crisis by bytesex · · Score: 1

    as long as we're having discussions like these.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:There is no real economic crisis by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Why would you say that? Even during the great depression, there where people talking about what's the best kind of radio.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  122. Smartphone + Pay As You Go by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

    I have a Nexus One that I bought at full price, and a T-Mobile Pay As You Go plan. I love having a computer in my pocket all the time, but I do very little talking on the phone, and I spend nearly all my time in places with wi-fi access. My cellular bills add up to about $25/year.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  123. Can't justify the high monthly cost by bhengh · · Score: 1

    I have a prepaid AT&T GoPhone which makes all the calls I care to make and costs me $9/month. In addition, I have an iPod Touch that does nearly everything an iPhone does whenever WiFi is available for $0/month. Sure, it would be nice to have a new iPhone that would work everywhere, but I just can't justify increasing my monthly fee by 700% for the convenience.

  124. Re:TP by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    You're implying there aren't better ways to clean shit off your body than using paper, but there are. Actually washing it off is vastly superior. If you had shit on your face would you just wipe it off with toilet paper? No, you wash it off with soap and water because otherwise your face would smell of shit.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  125. Oh for goodness sake by Jethro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got into computers when I was fairly young... well, for the time. I was 13, and Way Back Then not everyone was born already having a computer or three in the house.

    And even Way Back Then, one of the dreams, the truly grand dreams that we HOPED we'd ever see but didn't know if would happen in our lifetime, was a truly portable computer that fit in your pocket.

    AND NOW I HAVE ONE. It's in my pocket right now. It runs Linux, I can ssh into (and out of) it, it is virtually ALWAYS CONNECTED to yet another of our dreams, the now-ubiquitous Internet, I can TELL IT to search for something and 90% of the time it'll get it right, I can check my email on it, and in rare circumstances, and I mean rare... I can use it to make and receive phone calls.

    You know what you should do? STOP CALLING IT A "SMARTPHONE". It's a portable internet-connected computer that happens to be able to make phone calls, and it's AWESOME that something like this even friggin EXISTS. I can't WAIT to see what they look like in 5 years, let alone 10, but unless the thing requires brain surgery I'm sure as hell going to have one.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Oh for goodness sake by SAFH · · Score: 1

      I logged in for the first time in several years to reply to this. I completely agree and this is the enthusiasm that we need to keep. I was a late adopter of the new handheld computers because I loved my simple candybar style unbreakable phone that always worked.

      Sometimes I miss the tactile sensations of dialing a number on a rotary or the push buttons of an old Bell Labs and instead I now say "Call [Blah]" instead of looking it up in a phone book and feeling the paper.

      But, we're living in the future now and that is awesome. Hold on to the past but embrace the future otherwise you'll be left behind.

      --

      I cannot confirm nor deny the allegation or allegations you may or may not have just made

    2. Re:Oh for goodness sake by Jethro · · Score: 1

      What I'm waiting for is the tiny device with the 'virtual' projected screen. Kinda like a hologram but 2-dimentional, just project the screen up in front of the device (or above, whatever). THAT'S going to be fun.

      I think we'll have foldable tablets before that though. I'd LOVE to have my tablet's 10" screen with me at all times but hell if I'm lugging that thing around to the gym or to walk the dog or while I'm jogging etc etc.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Oh for goodness sake by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this except I liked my flip-phones because of the small form-factor... and cause it knda looked like you were opening a communicator from ST:TOS (:

      I did eventually switch to an Android phone a few years back and I am married to it now. Which I think is a 50/50 between "I'm embarrassed about it" and "THIS IS AWESOME".

      I know this is silly but there are rotary dialler apps. And my ring-tone (even pre-smartphone) is a recording I made of an old Bell-style phone ringing (:

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Oh for goodness sake by Jethro · · Score: 1

      It's not like I've replaced my OTHER computers with the smart"phone". The heavy stuff still happens on the desktop and laptops.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  126. Instant quality of life improvement by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

    I did not have a cell phone, then I got a no-contract Androind smartphone (Virgin Mobile has decent deals for this). I cannot drive, so I walk and bus everywhere. Just being able to know when the bus will arrive and have Google maps calculate how to get places while out and about was a huge and instant life improvement. And I have yet to use more than 40 minutes in a given month. The phone part is a nice extra feature, but the real win is internet in my pocket.

  127. How many times a day do you take a dump?
    How many times a day do you take a shower?

    --
    I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
  128. 1 function I could do about: voice calls by amorsen · · Score: 1

    I could do with a simpler phone which didn't do voice calls. However it's a simple enough function to throw in once you have built a basic PDA with 3g/4g connectivity anyway that it doesn't make much sense to cut it out.

    If I actually needed voice calls I would definitely go with a dedicated device; "smartphones" are notoriously crappy at that.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  129. Re:TP by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I implied no such thing.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  130. Phone least used feature by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    The phone feature is the least used feature on my smart phone. So yes, I need a smart phone.

  131. Things I don't need by caywen · · Score: 1

    Ketchup on my burger. Really, is this needed?? I'm doing just fine without it.
    Garage door opener. Really, is this needed?? I just yell out the car window and my wife opens the garage door.
    Slashdot. Really, is this needed?? I just open a text editor and rant about Microsoft, then close without saving.

    1. Re:Things I don't need by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Need as in 'Life is more convenient with it' not need as in 'I'm going to die.'

      If you are dating, and you want to increase your od of passing your genes, then I could argue there is an evolutionary need to have a smart phone!

      " I just open a text editor and rant about Microsoft, then close without saving."
      wha?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  132. For me, it's worth it by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    Back when the G1 came out, I'd just moved to a big city and didn't know my way around. Within *days* of getting the phone, it paid for itself with Google Maps Navigation.

    I don't use it as much any more since i know my way around, but it helped more than any GPS device would when I was searching for a house. I could load up Zillow and Trulia and find every house around me that was for sale and go check them out.

    Other commenters have already cited the value it brings in being able to check email and whatnot. Some folks say that they don't want to have email on their phone -- especially work email -- because they don't want to feel obligated to check it. It's more of willpower check -- if you can't discipline yourself, then don't add the account.

    But yeah, it's probably worth it if you find yourself spending "hours" getting caught up on your digital lifestyle each day, when you could spend 1-2 minutes once or twice an hour and spread your tasks out over the day.

  133. 4 reasons why people need web enabled phones by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    1. Their boss demands it (in today's economy, a request counts as a demand).

    2.They are a single man and want a social life. If you are married/a hermit, then you and your wife/hermit friends can avoid using the maxed out cellphone. But single men need to be able to contact women - HOWEVER the woman want to be contacted. It can be hell trying to call someone at work who wanted you to email her - or text or whatever she wanted. I am a guy so I don't know if women have it a bit easier, but I suspect not. And to check websites for addresses/times/etc.

    3. They have children. My sister has one and she uses the web to keep track of her kids. Smart phones help her a lot.

    4. You like music and feel no need to carry an ipod if you have a phone. This only works if your music is easily portable to your phone and back.

    I am sure there are others, but work, social lives, parenting, and music are all pretty focused on the smart phone now.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:4 reasons why people need web enabled phones by labradort · · Score: 1

      1. Their boss demands it (in today's economy, a request counts as a demand).

      2.They are a single man and want a social life. If you are married/a hermit, then you and your wife/hermit friends can avoid using the maxed out cellphone. But single men need to be able to contact women - HOWEVER the woman want to be contacted. It can be hell trying to call someone at work who wanted you to email her - or text or whatever she wanted. I am a guy so I don't know if women have it a bit easier, but I suspect not. And to check websites for addresses/times/etc.

      3. They have children. My sister has one and she uses the web to keep track of her kids. Smart phones help her a lot.

      4. You like music and feel no need to carry an ipod if you have a phone. This only works if your music is easily portable to your phone and back.

      I am sure there are others, but work, social lives, parenting, and music are all pretty focused on the smart phone now.

      I have a dumb pay as you go phone. Costs less than $100 per year. The data plan in my country is about $50 per month. It is too high for me. We do without a cell plan. We do without TV service. We watch netflix, youtube movies and the odd rental. Google news provides superior news to TV. Radio provides superior local news to TV.

      If the boss demands a smart phone, let the boss pay for the premium service! I won't even give my boss my cell phone number. It is my airtime.

      I can get internet from wireless cafes and such with a regular iPod. Same for listening to music. Costs $0 per month.

      The other things you mention can be done with a regular land line phone or a regular cell phone.

  134. Yup by Drumpig · · Score: 1

    Yes I do.

  135. Modern life.. by jimbo · · Score: 1

    This question is almost, but not quite, a troll. I think it was asked already understanding the answers.

    Still,- sure, I could so just fine without a smartphone. As a matter of fact I have a number of devices that are fun and/or convenient and I choose to have them for that reason.

    I got online in 1991 and I've loved it ever since. Having the Internet with me is just great! Although I don't have a data plan, wifi only.

    Well, I broke my neck two years ago. As a quadriplegic, the smartphone is now a great help to me.

  136. You are wrong, I have and have had many phones by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yes I have seen damaged iPhones (though not one that had a case on it). We also own currently a dumb-phone (for my wife). Plus of course I have quite a few pre-smartphone era cellphones I owned as well...

    So obviously I know what I am talking about. Who the hell are you? What do you even have? Or are you making the very generalizations you claim I am making?

    If you are truly so clumsy you might actually drop a phone ever just get a case and then it doesn't matter.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  137. Re: Do You Really Need a Smart Phone? by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  138. The Real World by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Some people enjoy the sense of adventure you get from not knowing exactly where everything is.

    I can have the same sense of "adventure" by not looking at the phone.

    Trust me. Most of the time I need a map, I'm in Montreal and there is a map on almost every street corner in down-town.

    Most of the world does not live where you cannot go more that four blocks away from your house without being eaten by a moose, and therefore requires a map at times.

    Also does that map list every single shop everywhere plus opening hours? Oh.

    Not everybody needs a smartphone.

    And I never said anyone did. I just said they are VERY USEFUL. If you disagree with that you are an idiot. That is simply fact.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  139. Fuck your post-PC era by treadmarks · · Score: 1

    Smartphones usually do not outmatch the devices they are supposed to replace. Being limited to pocket size basically ensures this. In contrast, computers usually are much better at everything. With a computer, you can play mp3/tv/video; write email/docs/programs; make and receive phone calls; read Kindle books; and play anything from Solitaire to Starcraft 2. And it does this better than mp3 players, TV's, typewriters, telephones, Kindle tablets, and Playstations.

    Smartphones can "do" a lot of the things other devices can, but it's usually not pleasant in comparison and for that reason I see them as backups or benchwarmers and I don't see them as a fun toy to spend lots of money on.

    1. Re:Fuck your post-PC era by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Some of us like top do things without a desk, and work outside

      "Smartphone usually do not outmatch the devices they are supposed to replace. "
      Yes they do, but you are under the delusion that they are supposed to replace you computer monitor.
      I mean, you can lug around your computer to use it's built in GPS...oh wait.

      Oh, and soon, you will just drop your smart phone into a doc and use it for everything you mention.

      MY Nexus S is better then any Navigation system, keeps pictures of my family better then any wallet, uses the cell system better then any PC, Is easier to take with me then any laptop, can run form a small solar charger, can tell me where any know astronomical object is better then any PC, is a better calendar then a wall calendar, is a stop watch, a times, and a great casual camera. Good luck using your PC as a camera.

      And yes, I have a computer at home. I use it to play games and develop.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  140. Smart Phone is cheaper for me and less to carry by unleashedgamers · · Score: 1

    I can use my simple phone for $73 a month where I live
    - pay $80 for 20gb internet
    - carry a camera that can take decent pics
    - mp3 player that can hold enough music
    - carry a map and compass
    - notepad and a pen
    or
    I can use my smart phone for $80 a month with 6gb bandwidth

    I normally use my smart phone because instead of carrying a backpack with all my stuff I carry it in my pocket, although for going 10km+ around where I live I take my simple phone (and everything else) because there is no network and I'd break/lose them one at a time than all gone at once in the middle of nowhere.

    I am considering buying an satellite phone for use where I bring my simple phone so I can actually use it and will be able to phone for help if I ever needed to.

  141. Yes, you do. by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    I'm going to go right on out and not pussyfoot around here.

    Yes, you need a smartphone. If you're "poor," you can get by without data. If you're not, you also need data.

    Do you listen to music while walking or taking the metro?

    Do you like to take photos or videos of your friends, places, and experiences so that you can reminisce years later?

    Are you a popular person with many friends? Are you a professional with many acquaintances? Do you have a large extended family? Do you like to be reminded of their birthdays and meetings/appointments, and do you want to keep track of their contact information and addresses?

    Do you feel more comfortable knowing you have a mobile telephone in case of emergencies?

    Do you drive a lot, and need help with navigation? If you take public transit, is it beneficial to be carrying a map of the metro / bus schedule at all times?

    Is it more efficient for you to send a quick text message than call a loved one because you're going to be late?

    Do you go restaurant hunting? When you travel, do you find it convenient to be able to find reviews on local entertainment venues?

    Is your memory imperfect? Do you write things down, so that you don't forget them?

    Do you fly a lot? Do you ever have to sit around an airport terminal for an hour, wishing you had something to occupy your time?

    Are you ever on-call? Are you ever concerned about the status of a project / a friend's condition / a significant news event while enjoying otherwise leisure time?

    Have you ever wanted to troubleshoot a "check engine" light, to save money? Watch the stars at night, and wonder "where did Jupiter go?" Have a friendly debate about what atomic number oxygen is? Need to transport large files between two non-networked computers?

    If you answered "yes" to one or more of the preceding questions, you need a smartphone. Not "need" as in you need water to live. Need as in it would be a positive introduction to your life.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  142. Heck, Yes! by Benedick · · Score: 1
    Once you have a smartphone, you can't live without it. Not because you get addicted to it like crack, but because it's so darn useful and versatile.

    On a recent vacation, I used my HTC Thunderbolt as: a phone, a text message device, a satellite navigation unit (GPS), a web browser, an MP3 player, a game console, and a camera. Seven functions. When I started thinking about it, it can also be: a calculator, a flashlight, a notepad, a WiFi hub, a voice recorder, an FM radio, and a bubble level. I'm sure there's many more. Having all that functionality in one device in your pocket is incredible.

    It's the computing equivalent of a Swiss Army knife. Get a smartphone and you'll love it.

  143. Short Answer? by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    No, I don't. In fact, I can't find a DECENT phone on my carrier.
    Upgraded from RAZR which finally fell apart. HTC Freestyle's interface takes more time to use and is more frustrating than the RAZR, and all I get is a camera for it, with a touch interface that is MORE DIFFICULT to use than my previous phone. Isn't technology supposed to make things easier?
    I don't use data (I see too many idiots who pay $35 a month to get a couple pictures from friends). I don't use apps.
    As a business owner I could probably use a smartphone that takes more time up to "use" than to simply go without. More technology isn't necessarily better, people!

    I. Just. Want. A. Phone.
    If you want to sell me something else, sell me something that is convenient, easy to use, USEFUL (NOT a consumption device like the iphone), and I will happily pay a nice chunk of money for that device.

    --
    -
  144. Yes by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Yes I do.
    I'm surprised how much I use my Smart phone for non phone related activities.
    Maps, Docs, txt, gmail, music.

    I love living in the future.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  145. There was a time... by Phics · · Score: 1

    ...when I hated phones that did anything other than make phone calls. I had a cellular phone so I could call people. I didn't want calendars that were awkward to use, I didn't want stupid games, I didn't want colour screens, and I sure has heck didn't want a camera that could only produce grainy photos the size of icons . A simple hand-held phone with 12 push buttons for punching in phone numbers, a decent battery, and a back-lit LCD from a pocket calculator - that was good enough for me. All I wanted was clear, simple, voice communications.

    In short, when the day that I dreaded finally came, and my boss tossed me a cheap Blackberry, I was thoroughly disgusted. It seemed to do everything relatively poorly except make a half decent phone call - that it couldn't do to save it's own diodes, and the phone rarely kept up with me whilst dialing numbers. The question "will it blend" became less about testing the robustness of a blender, and more about the sadistic glee I would receive while watching it disintegrate violently, forever freeing me from its torturous choke-hold on my daily life.

    But that was then, and these days, smart phones are now a vital part of what I do. They are better. They're faster. The networks are faster. The newer phones don't have to take a half an hour to boot. They integrate with the work I do. I need a lot of access to various types of communications and data on the road, and in emergencies, I need ways of dealing with certain issues remotely. Today's decent smartphones are fast enough and versatile enough to allow me to access information and perform vital tasks when I'm visiting a client or travelling. If I'm in a pinch, I can tether my netbook and get things done that way too. I think smart phones are finally coming into their own.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
  146. Cheap smartphones can be had by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    I bought my HTC myTouch 3G Slide from Craigslist for $250 last year. It gets HSDPA on T-mobile, giving me DSL-like speeds and latencies. Running CyanogenMOD 7.1, I always have a wifi access point anywhere. Best of all, the navigation features pretty much changed the way I plan and travel, so I found I could spend more time in interesting places... which was the real killer feature that I had really started to miss from the days when I had Google Maps Mobile on my work-issued blackberry.

    I lived with a dumb phone for a long time. It could barely run opera mini. I used my phone/PDA more often to read than to talk to people, so I'm pretty happy to pay for my upgrade to the data services. With T-mobile it was $10 for unlimited wap and an extra $25 for unlimited Android data. I use the Google Voice app for SMS so I don't have to pay extra to exchange the occasional message with "those people".

    The MT3GS does have limited application memory, so I can't install every useless game and utility available for Android. Which is a good thing. I picked up a Viewsonic G-Tablet from Craigslist for about $300 last year, and with the Vegan-Tab ROM it does a pretty good job of letting me play with all of the Android toys without worrying about compromising my phone. Yeah, people complain about the screen viewing angles, but it works for me, and otherwise has top-end Tegra 2 Android specs that are only recently being exceeded by the new Tegra 3 devices.

  147. It's quite the opposite by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

    I would much rather have a phone-sized device that has internet access almost anywhere but cannot make phone calls to a phone that has no real internet access.

    On an average month, I might use 5 phone minutes. Data? Well over a gig.

  148. Do I Need a Smart Phone? by SumterLiving · · Score: 1

    When I go out with "the guys" I feel like a jerk just sitting at a bar drinking. I have no one to talk to and no way to look up the trivia question. Might as well stay home and spend some time with the wife. Or I could get a smart phone and call friends, surf the internet and have a roaring great time not spending time with my friends who are sitting across the table from me. Seriously, it's gotten that bad.

  149. Honest Question by dorpus · · Score: 1

    Which plan lets you spend only $4 a month?

    1. Re:Honest Question by enjar · · Score: 1

      Most likely a prepaid one. There's generally a minimum you need to prepay to keep a phone "alive", and it's generally on the terms of "you need so spend $XX for N months to keep your service active". So whatever one it is is likely prepaying 3, 6 or 12 months at a certain rate for a certain number of minutes.

  150. iPhone 3GS + goPhone SIM = cheap smartphone by enjar · · Score: 1

    I got a used 3GS, added a GoPhone SIM card to it. If I want to be very cheap I can just pay for voice minutes, about $5. If I want data, I shell out $24. All you have to do is change the carrier APN, which takes 3 seconds. No jailbreaking or unlocking is required. I have no contract, and I generally use wifi at home or work.

    I had a dumb phone for years for the same price while I carried an iPod too -- and I always forgot to charge the thing so it was well and truly a waste of monry. Now I have everything in one place, which is much easier and it's always charged so I can take the rare phone call or get a text when someone (usually my wife) needs to get in touch with me. Or I can call ahead if I'm running late for something. Plus I have games, traffic apps, a camera and so on.

  151. Data Point by jsm18 · · Score: 1

    I use T-Mobile's Pay as You Go prepaid with a LG Optimus T. The phone cost me about $100 and I spend $8/mo or so on the service. I have regular phone service and WiFi at home and in the office, so the the phone is mostly used on the go. I mostly use the smartphone features for G-mail and to sync my office calendar. I refuse to set up my office e-mail on it. I'm not exactly a power-user, but at least I'm not paying power-user fees either.

  152. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by bingbangboom · · Score: 1

    Tmobile.com/prepaid has:

    $30 100min/unlimited text/5GB 4G data
    $50 unlimited talk/text/2G data
    $30 1500 min or text/30MB data.

    $200 for the Samsung Exhibit 4G II or use any GSM phone.

  153. Thank you. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    For being a generally awesome and responsible human being.

  154. Smart Phones are status symbols. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen a single post here showing otherwise. When I see someone walking down the street with a tiny dog in their purse, there are no different than someone tapping away on their ios/android device. They have uses for sure, but no where near what the companies are requiring you to shell out for them. The only reason I have a cell phone at all these days is to be on call, or if my car dies in the middle of nowhere. I talk to people face to face, and if we need to set plans, we do it over facebook which works just fine from anywhere that isn't a smart phone.

  155. You are describing a status symbol. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    Thank you for pointing that out.

    1. Re:You are describing a status symbol. by assertation · · Score: 1

      I've seen many status symbols come and go. I don't think smart phones are status symbols, though they are expensive and do not make financial sense. I think they are the latest must have toys for many people.

  156. This needs a hardware analogy by Pirulo · · Score: 1


    Gas car = HD
    Tesla =  SSD

  157. Selkie by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unless you're trying to imitate the accent of one Selkie Smith.

  158. Re:TP by daath93 · · Score: 1

    I hate assholes who stink up the work bathroom because they just cant go at home. 8:30 every morning there is a cloud of poo particles wafting from the bathroom next to my desk.

  159. I'll get an open smartphone... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    ...when they'll exist. I have been stating since the beginning of the smartphone era that I won't be interested in these beasts before they become really open. And by open, I mean that they can run packets sniffers on their GSM/3G stack (hint, Android does not allow that). Not because I want to break the securities of the network, but just so that I can check what is being sent to who and when.

    I am interested in the NeoRunner but it has a few drawbacks that makes it a bit too overpriced IMHO. The mobile network is a complete loss of opportunity. If it was as open and neutral as internet, we would have incredible applications by today.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  160. Re:Necessities usually don't create themselves by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly certain that I could live without a cell phone, but wouldn't like it.

    I am however 100% positive that I cannot live without nourishment.

    Sure I could live without eating, it is just the most convenient way of nourishing my body.
    I could however attach a drip tube and nourish myself that way.

    So eating is not a necessity, but nourishment is. Just to delineate what a necessity really is.

    Few things in this world are "necessary". Many things are just "convenient".

  161. Until October, there really wasn't an Android PDA by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because I want to run Android apps, not iOS apps, and until October, there really wasn't an Android PDA.

  162. You can't SMS a land line by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you need to send me a quick message, use SMS or email.

    What do you do if you're calling a friend or relative for a ride home after the city buses have stopped running for the day or for the week? You can't SMS a land line, and you might be trying to reach someone who happens to check his or her e-mail once a week if that often.

    1. Re:You can't SMS a land line by Rix · · Score: 1

      I suppose I'd do whatever I'd do to contact those people who only have fax machines.

  163. I can has N900? No? I am disappoint. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I happen not to live in a city where any store had an Nokia N900 portable computer on display. On May 15, 2010, I walked into a Best Buy store, a T-Mobile store, and a RadioShack store in Fort Wayne, Indiana. In each, I asked to try a Nokia N900 phone, and in each, I was disappointed.

    1. Re:I can has N900? No? I am disappoint. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The USA too? It's almost as if Nokia did a Baron Munchausen and deliberately made it difficult for people to get what they had heard of via word of mouth in addition to not really advertising the thing.
      I got mine via Hong Kong about eight months before the Australian release date yet still about six months after I'd seen someone with one.

  164. Buy Internet, get TV for only $5/mo more by tepples · · Score: 1

    About a year and a half ago I turned off all cable TV services.

    Then you must not live in a town whose cable operator offers TV nearly free with the purchase of home Internet service.

    1. Re:Buy Internet, get TV for only $5/mo more by danomac · · Score: 1

      Nope, they don't do that here.

      Here they do introductory pricing (new services get in some cases a 75% discount for the first six months for for tv/phone/internet the introductory rate might be $60 or so) and then it goes up to the regular $100-$150 a month. Not to mention that price for the TV package only gets you local channels. (Want sports? $15+ a month. Oh, you want some other extras, like time shifting? Another $10. Oh, you want specialty channels like Discovery or History? Another $10. Oh wait, the HD channels of the specialty channels aren't included with that subscription - another $15.) It can get out of hand very easily...

      On the other hand, I put up the antenna for perhaps $350 (a one-time cost.) Yep, not having cable for 3.5 months paid that off, TV doesn't cost me a thing now.

      Actually, I don't mind the antenna at all. The picture is actually better than my HD cable box (likely due to the cableco compressing the shit out of the signal.)

    2. Re:Buy Internet, get TV for only $5/mo more by tepples · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I put up the antenna for perhaps $350 (a one-time cost.) Yep, not having cable for 3.5 months paid that off

      So what did you do to keep sane during those 3.5 months between cutting the cable and buying the antenna? Not everybody is already in a position to invest $350 in cutting the cable. And how would this work for someone for whom NCAA football is like a religion?

    3. Re:Buy Internet, get TV for only $5/mo more by danomac · · Score: 1

      I actually cancelled the cable first. I found out about 3 months later that there was HD channels OTA here. I don't know what you mean by keeping sane, TV was never really a huge part of my life to begin with, like I mentioned in my other post. There's a big world with many things to do outside that front door!

      I don't really watch sports so that didn't really affect me. American football is not the popular where I am so that has no bearing on it either. Of the channels I have, there always seems to be NFL games, Gold and NHL games on the weekend over the air where I am.

      Like I said, it's not for everybody. For me, it's just perfect. There are occasionally some shows that might be interesting to watch, and most of the time it's on one of the channels I already receive.

  165. Who needs pants? by tepples · · Score: 1

    without a bulky laptop (or pants, for that matter)

    Who needs pants?

  166. I am a relative cell phone luddite by eepok · · Score: 1

    I don't want a smart phone. I don't want to come to rely on a smart phone. I love computers, but smart phones have become a distraction to the people and the world around them... and I never want the potential of becoming one of them.

    I see couples at dinner (young and old alike), both of their faces down in their smart phones. I overheard one say to another, "Hey did you read that article...?" "No. Link me." "Sent." (minutes later) "Heh. Ya. That's funny."

    No true conversation took place. They weren't "out together", they were mutually consuming.

    And it's not just "other" people. I went out for some beers and a game with my best male friend once. Halfway through his first beer, we were talking about play and he started stuttering his words... I look over (eyes having been previously fixed on the screen), and he's updating his facebook status to "Beers and a game".

    If it's not there for perpetual consumption, voyeurism, or exhibitionism, a smart phone is there to make up for laziness. Oh, you didn't get up in time to shower, dress, and get directions to your appointment? No problem! You can speed in the general direction of your appointment in your car while looking up directions on your smart phone! No problem there!

    Personally, I just want a phone that is a FANTASTIC phone (reception, sound, etc.), a good mp3 player, a good photo camera, a text messager with a QWERTY keyboard, and have great battery life. Who makes this phone? This simple phone? I'll continue to pay my $50 a month for unlimited text and 400 minutes. I accept that price in my area. But who makes this phone!?

  167. Like a watch by davidbofinger · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the author sees a PDA and thinks it's a phone with extra features. He could just as well have seen a phone and thought it was a watch with extra features - after all it's the method most of us use to keep track of time. But if he'd told us to get rid of our expensive mobile phone and just use a cheap watch we'd have reacted ... well, a lot like how we have.

  168. depends... by Tom · · Score: 1

    Like all things personal, it depends.

    For me, I could do without the phone functionality of my iPhone, but not without the PDA functions and I would hate to lose mobile Internet.

    If all you do with yours is making phone calls, by all means get a dumb phone. Don't think that your answer is the right answer for others, though.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  169. Happy to have a smartphone by Improv · · Score: 1

    The age of convergence is here. Ages ago, I got a Diamond Rio, in a hurried buy because lawsuits were threatening to make it illegal. It stayed legal, obviously, and I had a number of such devices afterwards, but now my phone does that. I also have had GPSs (for geocaching!), calculators, lightweight computers, portable modems, gaming systems, PDAs, and all sorts of other things that I just don't need anymore because I got an Android Phone (NexusOne, for the curious).

    I am not a heavy phone user in general. I lack a wallphone and don't talk on the phone very often or very willingly. That's ok. About 90% of my Android use is either as a very small computer (I love the note-taking app and sometimes use the sound recorder for voicenotes) or a data-communications device (GoogleMaps, Shazam, Skype, ssh, and so on).

    This means that nowadays I have exactly 3 devices I carry around with me almost everywhere: My laptop (18.1" HP running Linux), my Android, and a Kindle (sufficiently different battery life and abilities, and sufficiently lightweight, that it hasn't converged and probably won't for awhile).

    But then, not everyone will likely have my usage habits, and some people have strange ideas of device minimalism that they want to carry around 12 simple devices instead of 3 complicated/powerful ones.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  170. Supplement your phone by vga_init · · Score: 1

    I became an accidental smartphone user when I was a teenager because my father worked for a wireless service provider, so it was basically cheap for us to own one. I was lucky enough to be able to own various phones at different stages of smartphone development (my first smartphone was a fat, heavy Treo, and I had owned a Palm Pilot even before having a cell phone, which, ironically, was sleek and slim since the hardware was more spartan). Since I had used PDA's like the Palm Pilot, smartphones weren't anything new or amazing to me except that they were always connected to the Internet.

    As other posters have mentioned, if you are doing work that is heavily communication intensive and especially if you're traveling a lot or on the go, then smartphones are worth the money. Sometimes it's imperative that when someone sends you a text, you e-mail that text to three people, call one of them, reply to the text, go to a website and enter the information, and then look up directions to your new destination on Google Maps, all while you're sitting in your car in a parking lot with no nearby Internet access.

    Now, if you're looking to save money, dumping your smartphone can easily save you a chunk of cash throughout the year. You can cut corners in various ways; if you need Internet access while traveling, take your laptop to a cafe with a hot spot or your hotel. I used to have a 3G modem for my laptop, but I ended up getting rid of it because wifi was available in so many places that it didn't justify the additional expense. Or, if it's really not necessary, just do without Internet access for a bit and wait until you get home or to the office. The Internet can wait. Get a GPS that works offline (Lenovo IdeaPad A1 tablets do this, by the way).

    If you really just love mobile technology and want to play with it, get a nice wifi device such as an Android Tablet, iPad, iPod Touch, or something similar that gives you the functionality without the monthly bill. Use it at home or carry it with you and log on to hotspots.

  171. Re:TP by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Are you sure they are particles? Couldn't they be waves - or both particles and waves at the same time? What is the speed of poo? So many questions...

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  172. Re:$4/month? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    I have had T-Mobile's pay as you go plan for almost 3 years. Paid $100 the first year, used half the minutes. Had to renew after a year or would lose the minutes, so spent $10 to renew the minutes for another year. And spent another $10 this year. Total investment: $120 for 36 months = $3.33/month

    --
    I come here for the love
  173. Smart Phone or PDA? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Some of us use a 'smart phone' as a PDA, as we have bee carrying a PDA since the newton. I do agree however, that having universal mobile data is a nice plus, but not required in this case.

    The only alternative for us to a 'smart phone' would be to get something like a ipod touch, since the PDA market is toast. Or i suppose you could get a used ( outright purchase ) phone and not get any service for it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  174. Re:I want the opposite by trigpoint · · Score: 1

    I'd like my android phone with NO data plan. There are enough wireless networks around that I don't need a data plan. Unfortunately you can't seem to get the cool phone without a data plan. And no, I'm not going to carry a dumb phone and another device ;-)

    Can you not just buy the phone and get a SIM only deal thats suits you, or just pick up a pay-as-you-go sim?

  175. Archos by tepples · · Score: 1

    Archos has made such devices for a while, though they're not as well known (or as highly polished) as the Galaxy Player.

    I own an Archos 43. But like other generation 8 Archos devices, it's not Google certified and therefore lacks access to Market-exclusive applications such as Chase Bank's check deposit tool. It also has a resistive touch screen, which works better with a stylus (like the one I borrowed from my DS Lite) and doesn't work with applications requiring multitouch. The generation 9 hardware is Google certified but isn't yet available in a 4" form factor like that of the Archos 43.

  176. No chance to test the ergonomics of a product by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because online tends to have a 15% restocking fee for products that the customer finds unusably unergonomic but which are technically not "defective". See my rant about mail order.

  177. Re:I want the opposite by grub · · Score: 1


    Sounds like you almost want an iPod Touch. (Acrobits Softphone is a superb VoIP app for both iOS and Android :))

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  178. Where do you get your phone plan? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    The article says $4/month. WHERE can I find such a phone? I had a dumb phone paid $15 pre-paid monthly (Verizon) and could barely use it. Actual cost for what I use would be closer to $30-45 if I'm careful. Same goes for AT&T and Sprint pre-paid, they're no better than a standard plan with employee discounts.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  179. Re:without some damn 2 year contract by Tooke · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone - wait for it - without a contract. It's on AT&T's GoPhone style pay as you go service.

    So once you get past the initial hardware, which then comes down to a typical hardware decision, I get all the fun of a smartphone in places with wifi (work and McDonalds!) but all the low expenses of a prepaid-as-you-go plan.

    $100 in phone service lasts me about 4 months.

    That's the direction I've been figuring I'd go. T-mobile allows you to have a smart phone and buy a week or month of connectivity as you go, sans contract. It looks attractive.

    I also may do this. I need to research smart phones (I've never had one, and it seems like a fairly daunting task actually), but once I find an unlocked one that I like, I'll just buy a $5 sim card from t-mobile and get one of the no contract plans. I think I'll be going with $15/mo for unlimited texting and 10 cents/minute of talking, since I hardly ever call with my current phone (prepaid on verizon). It doesn't come with data connection, but I'm usually in range of wifi.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  180. In Canada by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    If you live alone, or with a partner who has a smartphone you can save money by moving to tethering. The only thing you lose is
    For example Mobilicity offers unlimited internet (about 256k up/4Mb down) for $10 a month. You can get Voice/SMS+MMS/unlimited data for $17.50 which is less than the cost of any ISP deal I've seen. You can also save on Router hardware.

    I enjoy having data on my phone because I use (and sell) voip, specifically a one time payment voip ($50) which provides voicemail (normally $8/mo) and unlimited calling in Canada. Other than that it's true having an old school phone has advantages, a physical keyboard for typing while walking, cheapness (read not being neurotic or having a huge iPhone+protector), speed (no cumbersome OS or multitasking to slow you down), BATTERY LIFE! and cheapness (again :)).

    The tinfoil hat implications of smartphone are horrendous as well. Apple and Google's work to dissuade people from having real control over their devices(every patch, every single god damn patch) goes far beyond their fear of having to compete with their older models.

    Still if you're not a gamer the cost savings of having a phone for internet outweighs the above price concern + Random usability. For me it's a calender and recording, both phone calls (I have a crappy memory and winning fights with girlfriends is soooo sweet(so sweet!)... plus not worrying that a company will pull a fast one, also for my work [consulting]), it also puts day trading within your reach if you're really a tech head and follow advancements (made a killing on Athlon)

    But that's just it, to each their own. I have a phone with a keyboard, for me a tablet or iPhone is a boobtube, made for viewing content and poking links not creating content and navigating properly. Having another device to take notes with (recording/email) is worth the price of admission even without internet connectivity and email.

    Anyway pay once VOIP service is available through Phaistoscommunications.com if anyone on /. still needs a smart phone and wants a phone number that will work forever with no bill (That's called quality).

  181. I Don't Have A Smart Phone by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

    They say everything has a price, but the price of a smartphone's service cost & contract length, isn't low enough yet for me to exchange my free time for extra hours of work in order to use a smartphone that I don't need wherever I go. I know I'm in the minority, but that's why I've never been bothered to get sucked into one. I actually just use a tracfone. I know, I'm not cool, but that's ok with me as long as I don't have to be under contract to pay $100 a month for the next two years.

  182. I have, but it's irrelevant by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You go ahead and calculate the ROI on that. I'm sure the ridiculous expense can be justified... or not.

    That is the criteria you use to judge if the extra payments make sense for YOU. For me the ROI does it fact vastly outweigh the cost (as others have noted the shopping benefits alone provide that, between being able to read reviews and skip over bad products and simple price matching).

    However that is utterly irrelevant to his point and my response. Because he was saying that absolutely there was NO WAY a smartphone could improve his life AT ALL. That is false. There are in fact things common to all people that smart phones help with.

    Again it may not help YOU enough to justify the extra cost. But that doesn't change the FACT that it helps you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  183. HEYYY!!! by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Grandpa, I told you to stay off of Slashdot before you've taken your meds, and there were no kids outside when you were yelling about them being on the lawn. And your landline just rang but the answering machine picked it up, while you were trying to get the DVR to eject.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  184. Missing the point by dave87656 · · Score: 1

    Even if you might not use it often, it's the fact that you could do things like:

    * check out a price on the internet without having to drive home from the store to check it on you pc
    * Use GPS is case you are someplace new and get lost
    * Re-read the email with the friends address because, although it was super easy to remember, you can't seem to remember it now
    * Show friends pictures on your Picasa web album when you coincidentally meet at the supermarket.
    * Take and send a picture when you see that fantastic sunset without always having to cart your camera around.

    I don't constantly use those features but it's nice to have them available when some unexpected comes along.

    1. Re:Missing the point by trigpoint · · Score: 1

      Even if you might not use it often, it's the fact that you could do things like:

      * check out a price on the internet without having to drive home from the store to check it on you pc

      And if its cheaper to reserve online for collection, order it and go and get a coffee for half an hour (PC World are wise to this and build in a delay before you are allowed to collect.

      * Re-read the email with the friends address because, although it was super easy to remember, you can't seem to remember it now

      Also good for booking references at the cinema, or collection references for goods you have reserved.

      Drive OpenStreetMap and easily spot areas that need attention.

      And one I did yesterday was to google the polish word for horseradish (Polish horseradish sauce is stronger) so that I could select the correct jar from the Polish Section of a local supermarket.

  185. Utter tripe, by mjwx · · Score: 1

    It's a HTC Desire Z, and while it works just as well as others' Android phones, the touchscreen is overly touchy, the volume isn't all it could be for the weight of the thing, and it requires a case. You couldn't possibly just stick this in a pocket or bag and expect it to survive.

    I have a HTC Desire Z and my experience is very different.

    The touchscreen is not "overly touchy". Sensitivity is as good as other phones.

    Not sure what you mean about volume, but the physical KB makes it bigger and heavier then a Galaxy S 2. On the plus side, You always know if it's in your pocket or not.

    It does definitely not require a case. I've carried mine around in my pocket for a year.Not a scratch on the screen, most of the chrome is intact except for that around the camera. Not only has it survied, it's thrived.

    Great battery life, very rugged, functional, smaller transistors on the CPU make it cooler and less energy consuming then contemporary phones. Physical keyboard makes typing fast, best yet it's very modable.

    you could just throw it places without worrying too much about it.

    This is your problem. Do you just "throw" your plates about then whining that your plates are broken?

    BTW, I have a tendency to throw my Desire Z onto my bed, it's never been near a case. As soon as I get ICS for it, she'll be good enough until HTC/Samsung release a new decent KB Android or until GoogleRola drop their locked bootloader policy and release the Milestone 3/4.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  186. Dumb phones by defaria · · Score: 1

    ... are for dumb people!

  187. The Longer Life by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Statistically the better informed person will live longer and be happier to boot, seeing as how they will be informed of many dangers beforehand.

    On the fly weather is just another thing the smart phone helps with, I was able to make a choice about driving through a heavy rain storm in Kansas based on live weather radar...

    But then I supposed in addition to your maps you carry a TV with you at all times as well that has a subscription to local weather only stations.

    I also have paper maps but they are only a last escort, since they have comparatively so little information (especially up to date information) compared to maps on the smart phone.

    I mean basically, the person who has more information readily accessible will naturally be happier since life is simply easier for them and it's easier to deal with changes life throws at you. I know it's true in my case, life is just so pleasant when you can know what you want on demand...

    You can't really understand I guess until you've walked a month in the Information Moccasins.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Longer Life by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      You seem awfully concerned about potential dangers - and the weather. Live in Tornado Alley? Listen, I get what you're saying, but there's also such a thing as information overload and worrying about things you cannot control. Sometimes more is not better. I've been a Unix sysadmin for 25+ years on almost every Unix system known (PC to Cray-2). I'm connected and as up-to-date as I need to be, but If I were to never see another computer again, that would okay.

      As for me, my wife of 20 years died in 2006 of a brain tumor, just 7 weeks after diagnosis. Died in my arms; I heard her last breath, felt her last heartbeat. I gained a lot of perspective during our last weeks and moments together. On day one, when the doctor said that it was probably a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) I knew she was going to die. More information didn't make anything better.

      She was 61 and I was 42 (now 48). We were (I am) debt-free with already enough savings for ... well forever. Now it's just me and "The Longer Life" isn't so appealing. Sure, I go to work (so I don't get bored) and carry on, but I don't worry about much anymore. Thing is... I'm smart, healthy and fit and will probably live longer than you - sigh.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  188. Do You Really Need a Smart Phone? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    No. Mobile internet access is convenient at times but it's not a matter of need.

    What's with the easy answer polls these days?

  189. Smug Dumbphone users... by the_tommes · · Score: 1

    I get increasingly fed up with those smug dumbphone users! They constantly brag about their non-abilties. Luckily those kind of folks don't use Facebook so much. They couldn't even. ^^

  190. Re:pay-as-you-go plan by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Naw, pay as you go plans are voice only.

    But that's just it, you go to any place with wifi for your web and texting.

    So since I worked out the implications of the fact I don't talk on the phone much, I save about $800 a year on my phone.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  191. Indeed - but that's why I want a proper keyboard by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

    Yes, exactly! It's not a phone, it's a portable web browser, game machine, music player, and chat client that happens to also make phone calls (as long as the SMS/chat works, I could almost do without the voice call functionality to be honest). I realized I needed one when I was traveling across Europe and found myself spending a lot of time looking for Internet cafes just to be able to find and book a hotel for the night (couldn't do that ahead of time since I picked my next city on a whim each day).

    For that reason however, I also hate the recent fad for touchscreen-only phones. I think the form factor of Nokia n900 is perfect (except for thickness) - when that broke, had to search far and wide and the only new phone in that form factor appears to be Droid 3, which I had to import from Canada :(

  192. Re:iPhone GoPhone by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Heh Sorry, let me first opine that your suggested article, despite you meaning well, is off the mark.

    ((Summarized - Fiddling with apn slots and... uh...))

    I have an iPhone 3GS, so maybe all bets are off with an iPhone 4, but so be it. I had a previous standard phone contract.

    I just went to an AT&T store and said "Hi. I'd like to cancel this contract and turn this into a GoPhone." So I paid the cancel fee, then the AT&T rep fiddled with stuff, did something on the service records in their computer, and I was done.

    Almost no issues. An "issue" (in quotes) is that I have no more phone-based web, but for my usage style, there's nothing that can't really wait until I get home or, ... wait for it, ... any place with Wifi! So yes, McDonalds is a key player here!

    And I specifically buy the $100 chunks of phone minutes. They last a year, not X months. So the last potential issue, that "pressure" to keep dealing with things, goes away. On my quietest months, I can squeeze a 5th month out of that $100, but then it's just time to buy more, so what. Add a little splurging and that's $250 per year rather than $1100 per year!

    Don't quote me on this last part but I think the account "just sits there" empty if you run out of minutes, so the last benefit is that generally you don't have the Credit Rating risk of slipping off the treadmill of Pay the Phone Company Or Else.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  193. Re:Gaaaahh! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    You're funny, but I'm no FanBoy, it was a quietly reasoned decision.

    My previous phone was a Win Mobile 6 HTC, which I really didn't care for at all, and given the (later true) rumors that Win Mobile 6 was about to be toasted, the only other choice was the iPhone. I spent a little extra care waiting for the 3GS version, so it could now run iOS 4, and there it will sit.

    Android is definitely the NEW game to play, but I'm going to sit and wait out the fragmentation wars.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  194. Have a separate basic phone by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    I make the case for having a separate basic phone:
    http://moneybutnofixedabode.blogspot.com/2007/10/phone-for-traveller.html

    In this blog post I'm referring to use for people who travel a lot. But it seems relevent here too.

    Keep your tablet or smartphone for non phone things and a separate basic very small phone for phone things. This way if you run out of battery you can still make calls. It's so much simpler than falling into a universe of emergency chargers, trying to get all features into one device and so on.

    Now... what about that camera....

        doh!

    Well, I was making the case for pairing a Android tablet with a watchphone... but to get a camera in there too? hmm...

  195. Re:When do you need data? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    I probably don't need unlimited data, but I don't pay that much for it because I'm grandfathered into one of the original iPhone plans.I think to save any money I'd have to go down to a 1GB a month plan. While I don't really need the unlimited, 1GB seems a little short.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  196. I do both, have a nice smartphone and pay little by maxbash · · Score: 1

    I have a really nice smart phone and very good monthly rate. The trick is to not to get suckered into a subsidized phone contract. I bought a unused Palm Pixi for $60. (Laugh all you want, WebOS is freaking awesome) I got a no contract T-Mobile plan for $30. 1500 Mins, 30 MBs data. I can get free wi-fi almost everywhere I go, so I don't even hit my low data cap. No overages too. I wish I found this setup years ago. I have a friend that followed my lead, but he got a nice Android phone for about $150 He is very happy and he has cooler apps than me.

  197. For the price of moving by tepples · · Score: 1

    Non-solution. For the price of moving, I could pay for a full-price smartphone plan.

    1. Re:For the price of moving by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but it would be close.

  198. Re:I'm gonna say it by avandesande · · Score: 1

    But seriously do they spend thousands of dollars on this stuff? The way it stands now people spend a LOT on these things. Luckily I locked in on Virgin Mobiles 25$ unlimited data plan.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  199. It's Not a Phone by Zyrkyr · · Score: 1

    I've heard the same argument: "I don't need a phone with all that crap." For people who only want voice communication, that's great, but some people miss the point: many of us don't buy "phones" to yak at each other, but rather for mobile computing which happens to let us make phone calls as well. I was ready to ditch my last cell in favor of a Galaxy tablet with a bluetooth headset, but they ended up being crippled in that respect (and massively expensive), so I went with the Galaxy S instead.

    My Android device isn't a "phone" any more than an automobile is a giant mobile cigarette lighter. Yes, you can light a cigarette with it (and also listen to radio and keep warm in cold weather, etc.), but the primary function of the machine is for transportation. The primary function of a "smartphone" is as a portable Internet-connected computer.

    To be fair: it is kind of pathetic that I can't wait 20 minutes to check my email, etc. while I'm walking or riding the bus, but there you go. :-/

  200. Wha? by binford2k · · Score: 1

    When did Roblimo turn into a curmudgeon?

  201. Google Maps by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

    If the only app I could ever install on my smartphone is Google Maps, that alone is worth the price of admission and why your dumb phone will always be vastly inferior. But then again, if you're so dang cheap, you probably don't get out much, anyway, and don't need Google Maps.

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  202. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  203. Re:Seriously ditching my phone by smart_ass · · Score: 1

    Get the downloadable Wikipedia, stuff it on an SD card
    Keep that in your smart phone and disconnect the data plan
    Cheaper and will still resolve most of the bar arguments

    --
    Ouch ... did I just say that.
  204. Been waiting a long time for an all-in-one device by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    Carrying a smart phone is far easier than carrying a cell phone....and a GPS, and a music player, and a digital still/video camera, and a PDA, and a portable game device......

    I do have enough pockets in the cargo pants I usually wear for all of those things, but combining them into one also leaves me room for a wallet, pocketknife, keys, papers, change, etc

    Otherwise I'd need a backpack.

  205. Re:Do you r... Freudian slip ? by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    I now officially have Vagina Envy.

  206. Do you even need a cell phone? $4 plan isn't rel. by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

    My job requires me to have access to web applications.
    I can simulate it using a different browser, or my phone.

    Email notifications are exceptionally important for mobile techs. I've provided mobile support, I've needed a smart phone.
    I use it to tether internet if I need it on the go.
    I receive and respond to inquires or get additional information by email.

    It syncs with my appointments so I can keep track of them all on the go.

    Do I need one? No. Is it damn handy? Sure.

    Chances are most people in general don't even need a cell phone, they're just convienent.

    Also - anyone getting a new plan say in B.C with a dumb phone will not get a plan for 4$, just a little bit more lands them data. They did it intentionally to encourage people to upgrade since the price difference isn't much different.

    So...your point is moot.

  207. Three years with no Android pod touch by tepples · · Score: 1

    iPod Touch: That's the way I went.

    The trouble is that it took three years for there to be a serious competitor to the iPod touch. From 2008, when iOS 2 introduced the App Store, to 2011, when Samsung finally brought out the Galaxy Player, were three years without a pocket-size Wi-Fi-only tablet with Android Market access.