Slashdot Mirror


Some People @Home, Some Not @Home

11thangel writes: "Dotcomscoop is reporting that Excite@home has released a statement saying that they have discontinued service to AT&T, as it's certain negotiations will be fruitless. All others are still at the bargaining table. Earlier statements indicated that an example would be made out of one provider, AT&T being the obvious target. Everyone else keep your fingers crossed." There's a Reuters story about AT&T being unplugged. Various submissions have noted that some people who still have connectivity have lost their DNS servers. Just add "64.28.67.150 slashdot.org" to your hosts file and you should be good to go. :)

513 comments

  1. I'm back online by XBL · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm here in Iowa (under AT&T @Home), and my DNS has been down all day. It came back up an hour ago.

    My mail server reports that my account doesn't exist :-(

    Overall, I am impressed how AT&T has moved all its customers off Excite and onto their own network... I dunno how they did it.

    1. Re:I'm back online by MrNovember · · Score: 3, Redundant

      At first I was impressed with the speed Charter moved everyone onto their network (in Wisconsin) but I was just thinking that it's probably not all that difficult. But really it's pathetic that the expectation level for cable TV/telecom customer service makes us actually "impressed" when it simply works like it should.

    2. Re:I'm back online by trenton · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not all customers have been moved. I'm in Berkeley, CA on AT&T@Home and I'm totally down. Can't ping from inside or outside the network. It was working when I went to bed at 5:30a but stopped working by noon when I woke up. (Civ 3 sleep pattern.)

      I called their 800 number. Their recording said I'd be back up in 7 days. In the meantime, I'll receive 2 days of credit for every day I'm down.

      --
      Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    3. Re:I'm back online by Versa · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think I ever went off line (iowa) I was using it last night till 11pm. left filesharing apps up. and just used it again at 2:30 pm today seems to have been up all the time.

      Tracert shows I go through 3 @home hops (cedar rapids, desmoines then chicago)before going to att backbone. I don't remember if its always been those hops or not (at least the first three were the same).

    4. Re:I'm back online by PingXao · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Civ3 sleep pattern LOL

      I hear that! I wouldn't worry too much about your online status. I dropped to almost 0 since I got Civ3

    5. Re:I'm back online by aka-ed · · Score: 5, Informative
      Overall, I am impressed how AT&T has moved all its customers off Excite and onto their own network... I dunno how they did it.

      Not all their customers...yet. Here's the latest on the migration plan.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    6. Re:I'm back online by dohnut · · Score: 1



      Um, are you sure you have AT&T as a cable provider? AT&T more or less pulled out of Iowa earlier this year. Those AT&T cable/broadband assets in Iowa are now owned by Mediacom.

      --
      Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
    7. Re:I'm back online by cornflux · · Score: 2
      Overall, I am impressed how AT&T has moved all its customers off Excite and onto their own network... I dunno how they did it.
      According to some news reports, about 10% of AT&T customers have been switched -- that's not exactly all.

      Coincidentally, I think most everyone in the Puget Sound (aka, Seattle) area, if not the majority of the state, is offline.

      Yeah, I'm impressed with AT&T, too.

    8. Re:I'm back online by bandit450 · · Score: 1

      Rogers (and numerous other Canadian affiliates of @home) started moving people onto their own networks and mail servers a few weeks ago. There wasn't a single noticable glitch.

      Woo hoo for them!

      --
      -- Bandit450...If-Else-Do-*TWITCH*!
    9. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I had breif connectivity not using their DNS server, but now it is gone again. I was told by tech support that it would be about seven days until they got to us (in Central Pennsylvania), and that once the new network was up and running they would no longer be able to provide me with the static IP I need to contact secure servers that I manage which use hosts allow/denigh to access.

      All in all, they were rather obnoxious about it. AT&T is being puchased by Adelphia in my area, but not soon enough. As AT&T pointed out, their service is strictly for recreational use.

      Now I am populating my home network from the modem in my airport.

    10. Re:I'm back online by swordboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      For people without DNS:

      Just go to google and find the DNS servers of a local university. Add them to your IP config and you are all set. I am in michigan and ours are still down. I'm using Oakland University's DNS and it works fine.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    11. Re:I'm back online by eyez · · Score: 1
      I'm not. i'm posfing from my dreamcast now-- my cablemodem is not working right now, and all i can get out of AT&T is a recording promising that it'll work within a week and that i'll get a whopping *2 day* credit on my bill.


      right now i'd feel happier if i could kick any single @home exec or shareholder squarely in the not normally a violent person.


      Oh well; i guess i get to stay offline for a while.


      p.s. the 'no dns' thing is a step before what my connection is doing now- i'm SOL.

      --
      get 0wned. irc.w30wnzj00.com
    12. Re:I'm back online by oscill8 · · Score: 1


      So... are you able to get online after that?

      --
      -Oscill8-
    13. Re:I'm back online by interiot · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      google's IPs are: 216.239.37.100, 216.239.33.100

    14. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rogers (and numerous other Canadian affiliates of @home) started moving people onto their own networks and mail servers a few weeks ago. There wasn't a single noticable glitch.

      Except that service was down for 5 hours starting at 12:30 am this morning.

    15. Re:I'm back online by Abstrakt · · Score: 1
      Although Rogers have recently setup their own mail/news/dhcp/dns/proxy servers, customers are still being routed through the @Home network for now.

      As part of their contingency plan, Rogers have activated a new link to Teleglobe... Presumably that link will serve as an improvised backbone, should negotiations with @Home fail.

      Cheers,

    16. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am on the other side of Michigan and I don't even get an IP address!!! DNS entry will do little for my prbs :(

    17. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my own caching name server the pulls from the root servers. I know what my ip was when they had DHCP problem is that I don't know what my gateway address is. I think if I had that I could move again. Stinking dial-up just does not compare!!

    18. Re:I'm back online by ldreed · · Score: 1
      From the referenced press release:
      "AT&T Broadband has communicated with all of its high-speed cable Internet customers during the past few weeks to help them prepare for these developments."
      Wow, I must be the only customer they didn't communicate with. Not an email, not a phone call, not a smoke signal, nothing. Went down at about 7 this morning, and am now on a dialup. I can't wait for DSL to reach my area...
    19. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try traceroute from your dial-up to your previous ip address. you may be able to get the gatway from this information ... if icmp's aren't filtered.

    20. Re:I'm back online by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      I'm not. i'm posing from my dream cast now

      ha-ha, kick ass :P. Good thing you remembered where the web-browser CD was. Don't you still have to pay for the DC dialup though?

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    21. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's 2 days credit for every one day the service is out

    22. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just roll your own dns? Domains are cheap now. Godaddy, joker, ghandi etc all sell domains by the year and for less than 10 bucks.

      With your own domain name, dns, and a good connection next start your own isp. Add a few modems to the sucker and charge people 5 dollars a month for dial up. Look the domain iamacheapass.com is still available! You can underbid netzero now that they charge.

    23. Re:I'm back online by dvNull · · Score: 1

      It went down at 6:42:44 this morning. Thank god for timestamping on xchat ;)

      dvNull

    24. Re:I'm back online by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate when people say goto the web when your service isnt working. Same logic at work, you call in, my network access isnt working, they say please goto the intranet website and fill out a support request form.

    25. Re:I'm back online by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      At first I was impressed with the speed Charter moved everyone onto their network (in Wisconsin) but I was just thinking that it's probably not all that difficult. But really it's pathetic that the expectation level for cable TV/telecom customer service makes us actually "impressed" when it simply works like it should.

      Indeed, not that big a deal. Local cable company network engineers change router settings, define rules for clients, setup DHCP, and they're basically done.

      I'm just livid that 1) I got five emails saying when Excite gets turned off, I should visit newuser.attbi.com (link intentionally omitted) 2) That site didn't go up until the judge ordered the shutdown 3) Once it went up it was continually jammed until I was disconnected from the net. and 4) When I called the telephone number from the voice mail they left me, all the monkey on the other end of the phone could tell me was "Duh..."

      I'm on through a free AOL account right now... The things I do so I can bitch and moan on slashdot...
      --
      Who did what now?
    26. Re:I'm back online by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      I have adelphia in Caroll County Maryland.... its all DHCP here buddy, so don't exepect to be able to connect to those servers once they change over.... I have been told that they may begin offering static IPs as an add on for an additional charge after the first of the year... I have similar issues and have not worked a way around it yet....still working on it though ;-)

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    27. Re:I'm back online by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      The letter my friend showed me today said (paraphrased) "Restart your computer and open Internet Explorer. The page that loads will have software you can download to make your internet connection work again."

      I'm guessing AT&T has never heard of the concept of creating your own home page, or going to one of your choosing.

      Of course, this logic path is only helped by PCs running Windows, where the average user thinks that there's some funny little wizard, replete with star-embroidered cloak and hat, sitting inside making it all work - and they know damn well you never mess with wizards! Here there be dragons, touch nothing, do nothing...

      Of course, if you weren't on a PC at work, your network configuration wouldn't miraculously shit itself...

      --

      Moof!

    28. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just set up a caching nameserver. the relevant files ship with nearly all linux/*bsd distributions. I believe that the windows nameservers also ship with appropriate cache setups.

      realistically, you should do this anyhow
      to save on latency and not pester other nameservers with your requests.

    29. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, UNLESS your home page was on your computer or your own internal network, or something else NOT on the internet, IT DID go to the page they spoke of, dumbass.

    30. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to say that your mail account may not exist because AT&T wanted users to switch to a new mail server. It has to do with AT&T's own broadband network, or something of that sort. If you're in Oregon or Washington (or even if you aren't), try using mail.attbi.com as your incoming/outgoing mail server and change your address to an attbi.com domain.

    31. Re:I'm back online by Phork · · Score: 1

      actually, they did think of that. they do this trick with dns. any hostname you try to resolve resolves to the page with instructions. So unless your homepage is on your local harddrive, or you dont use their dns servers, it wont be a problem.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    32. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same story here. Went to bed at 4am, all was fine. Woke up Saturday at 8am (catnap!) and was out cold. My modem still had 4 steady lights, but no connectivity. LAN & Linksys Router all worked great. Made the 1-888 call, waited 20 min to hear that it'd be a few days before migration took place. Plus 2 days for every day lost.

      Johnny Law

    33. Re:I'm back online by protovirus · · Score: 1

      Well, it's because AT&T actually owns the majority of equipment it's cusomters use. I for one, am glad to see that port blocking pig excite@home go down.

    34. Re:I'm back online by jobugeek · · Score: 1

      I think Mediacom is/was using @home backbone. They have a blurb on their website talking about the case and that they currently are still up. I'm on mediacom in Cedar Rapids and it's still working.

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    35. Re:I'm back online by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      Uh. Yeah. Sure it did. You sure seem to know a whole lot for someone who doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground.

      #1) My friends homepage is hosted on his PC at work.
      #2) His homepage went NOWHERE. His network, according to AT&T, will not be available for SEVEN days.
      #3) When the network comes back up, it WILL take him to his regular homepage. This is because he doesn't use AT&T's DNS servers (@Home's were so ridiculously overloaded that he had to switch).

      So rather than be an AT&T apologist, and immediately finding fault with everyone who says opposite what you "KNOW!" is true, why not open your puny little mind to the concept that maybe, just maybe, you don't know all the facts.

      --

      Moof!

    36. Re:I'm back online by jimbob5000 · · Score: 1

      Got up this morning, noticed the modem lights were blinking again and the firewall was going nuts. Went to check the web, and I was back in business. Total outage time was about 24 hours (which, BTW, makes this only the fourth longest outage I've had since getting the cable modem -- @Home had me down for more that two days twice.

      The automated message was "three days" for N. Seattle, so I'm impressed with AT&T's ability to get the network back. I'm definitely not happy with the 1.5Mb ceiling -- on a Sunday morning I should be absolutely flying, but right now it's eeking along However, I am willing to delay judgement on them -- at least until the Olympics (and the far superior Canadian coverage on CBC) is over.

      If I dump AT&T, I'm dumping everything AT&T -- cable and cable modem. They'll be off the list for wireless, LD, weed 'n' feed, whatever. They are warned.

    37. Re:I'm back online by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm still not sold on this concept.

      Rather than just switching DHCP servers around and getting everyone up on the new network after a simple reboot, they're forcing every DNS resolution to take the user to a server they've setup with SOFTWARE that must be installed to use the new network.

      This decreases their support load... how?

      Once Joe User with an unstable Win9x box installs this software, thereby pushing their system over the edge and making it a hunk of metal and plastic instead of a computer, AT&T is going to... recompense this guy for lost data? Of course not! "There was no other way we could have done the move!"

      Uh huh. As someone who just migrated from one T1 provider to another, let me say: Bullshit. This is the #1 reason I tell everyone to avoid cable modems like the plague unless they absolutely have no other way to get broadband access. They can take their proprietary crap and shove it up their ass.

      Of course, the #2 reason is all that @Home was a spamhaven, and as a result had ridiculous packet loss due to all the bullshit floating around their network.

      --

      Moof!

    38. Re:I'm back online by jbrians · · Score: 1

      Seattle metro area was offline all day yesterday. I got back on-line around 12 noon today.
      -Brian

      --
      "Faith strikes me as intellectual laziness." -Robert A. Heinlen
    39. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ervice i back up, however this trick doesn't work, so I don't have access. Yeah!

    40. Re:I'm back online by elizard2k · · Score: 1

      oh your internet isn't working sir? ok, that's no problem, we'll just email you the correct steps to fix this, and if you'r still having problems just go to our website, and visit the help portion

      --
      - mescaline - its the only way to fly -
    41. Re:I'm back online by cronik · · Score: 1

      Two questions first, are you paying ~$50 a month and getting 1.5 Mb/s if so please shut the hell up unless you can get a better deal. If you can then great but this seems like a major flame. When I went with PacBell (SBC) DSL it took 2 weeks to install, was up for a week then went down for 3, and never had the speeds advertised. ATT came in and installed within 3 days (time from first call) This is my third outage with ATT in the past year. BFD 13 days down in a year isnt that bad when 4 of those were because of cars hitting above ground junctions. I had more then that with dialup's. It seems that a lot of people are bitching about the best connection they have had.

      --
      Information wants to be free like speech wants to be free, not like we want beer to be free.
    42. Re:I'm back online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be ILLEGAL for service providers to change DOMAIN names. I HATE AT&T

  2. Poor guys by NightRain · · Score: 5, Funny

    I clicked on the link in the main article, and what are the words I see? "Overwhelming traffic to DotcomScoop.com has created technical problems leading to data loss. Recent news stories published on the site are lost for the time being. We will continue to provide updates as news warrants."

    And this is before the /. effect hits them. I feel their pain :)

    1. Re:Poor guys by TheAJofOZ · · Score: 1
      And this is before the /. effect hits them.

      What do you mean? They will have been swamped by /. users almost instantly after the story was posted. This is slashcode 2.0 - it has faster response times.....

  3. Real Slashdotters by soulsteal · · Score: 5, Funny
    A bonafide /.'er would add two lines to their HOSTS file:
    • 64.28.67.150 slashdot.org
    • 209.242.124.241 www.goatse.cx

    Just to be fair to the trolls...

    1. Re:Real Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a perverted freak

    2. Re:Real Slashdotters by freakonaleash881 · · Score: 0, Funny
      my hosts file -
      127.0.0.1 goatse.cx
      127.0.0.1 www.goatse.cx
      127.0.0.1 rotten com

      etc...hehe

      --

      Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo...a star shines on the hour of our meeting
    3. Re:Real Slashdotters by yomegaman · · Score: 1, Funny

      You love those sites enough to cache them locally? You make me sick!

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    4. Re:Real Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rotten.com has some genuinely amusing content (try here, here, or here), you know. It's not all people eating babies.

    5. Re:Real Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      209.242.124.241 is actually running a number of virtual hosts, of which goatse.cx is only one. If you go there without sending a referer header, you'll end up at hick.org, the server's primary site. This explains why you don't see any trolls linking directly to goatse.cx's IP address, hoping to con people into clicking the link unwittingly.

    6. Re:Real Slashdotters by invenustus · · Score: 1

      Holy Lord! That Japanese Sex Catalog was the funniest display of bad grammar since Metal Gear! If only this were around in A.D. 2101, maybe CATS wouldn't have expressed his frustrations so viciously....

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    7. Re:Real Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's why you put the entry in your hosts file. That way, when you type in "www.goatse.cx" your browser will send the appropriate "Host" header (that's the one that matters, not "Referer") and you'll get the right site.

    8. Re:Real Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget
      127.0.0.1 wolfauthorize.idsoftware.com

    9. Re:Real Slashdotters by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      No. A real slashdotter doesn't use a hosts file. He runs his own DNS server. I know I do.

      Thanks for playing :)

    10. Re:Real Slashdotters by limejuice · · Score: 1

      Nah, a model slashdotter couldn't possibly run linux, ar any other unix variant on his production system. He is 'forced' by Microsoft to run Windows of course! He will only 'claim' to run an alternative operating system when in certain discussions in order to be 'rebellious', 'cool', to 'stick it to the man', and/or to fit in with slashdot's fake 'subculture'.

      --
      Daniel J. Kelly
  4. Excite@[home] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coincidently (?) their building sign only has "Excite@" illuminated (the "home" portion is dark)... or maybe it's irony... sarcasm ? ^_^

    1. Re:Excite@[home] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its true, just drove by Redwood City on 101. The "home" portion really is dark. Its so much more funny that the above comment is actually true.

    2. Re:Excite@[home] by Abstrakt · · Score: 1
      • Coincidently (?) their building sign only has "Excite@" illuminated (the "home" portion is dark)... or maybe it's irony... sarcasm ? ^_^
      LOL! Is there any chance that someone from that area could take a picture of it? Please? I'd love to see this...

      Cheers,

    3. Re:Excite@[home] by Diet+Rapture · · Score: 1

      That sign's been dark for at least 5 months. Then again, they've been in trouble for over a year...

      --
      Stop eating my hands.
  5. quick transition with Charter by Shook · · Score: 1

    I got a letter this week from Charter (my cable TV provider) saying they were trying to work out a transition plan. My service went out sometime between 4pm yesterday and noon today (I was out of town)

    In the mail, I had a setup CD from Charter. I unplugged my router, ran the Windows program, copied the changed settings to my router, and and am now back up and running, with less than a 24 hour outtage.

    On the downside, It added a Charter logo to IE, and changed my IE color scheme to flat white, and set my default page to charter.msn.com. But I'm just glad to be reconnected with no problems.

    1. Re:quick transition with Charter by dszd0g · · Score: 1

      I am in a different boat than you. I received an e-mail from them on the 16th that said I would be transitioned over to their Pipeline service. However, they did not specify any timeline. They said that they wanted to do everything they could for their customers to maintain network connections. If they really meant that, they would pay @Home and negotiate a new contract.

      I gave Charter High-Speed tech support (888-590-4694) a call and they referred me to another number (888-843-0785) dealing with this issue, but it was not currently with in the business hours of the new number when I called. When I called the second number the next day, the guy I talked to (Doug) was less than helpful. He said that all they are doing is taking down names and contact information and would get back to me in the next three days. It's been 2 days and I am waiting to hear back from them.

      I do not believe that I have received very good support from Charter. I really would like to know how they wish to keep me happy and from changing ISPs.

      I looked over the AUP for the Pipeline service and was not too impressed. @Home's AUP is a ton better. The Pipeline AUP basically says that they will terminate your account if you post or send any messages that are profane or obscene. I guess if I send a sexual joke to a friend thats grounds for termination of my account. One is not allowed to use any identity other than their own, or offer any information about yourself that is not true. I guess using dszd0g instead of my real name on Slashdot is grounds for termination of my account. Older women who jokingly claim to be 21 would also be grounds for termination. I think Charter really needs to revise their AUP.

      --
      This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    2. Re:quick transition with Charter by bluntmanspam · · Score: 1
      Just for everyone's information: If you got this CD from Charter, you don't have to run the installer. Just change your IP address to dynamic, or refresh your IP address and you should be fine. That's all I had to do.

      That way you don't have to reset your home page back to slashdot.org.

    3. Re:quick transition with Charter by Stardo · · Score: 0

      You actually use IE?!? :)

      --

    4. Re:quick transition with Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My @home service in Madison WI turned off at 1:AM.
      Their installer is bogus; don't run it.
      The charter.net email server is running, but the
      cable connection is not.
      The modem lights just blink in an endless cycle
      as it tries to connect.
      Yesterday they told me that, worst case,
      all I would have to
      do is hit the reset button on the modem to
      sync. to the charter frequency after the @home
      frequency vanished.
      Well, it isn't working out that way...

    5. Re:quick transition with Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in Madison, WI and had a similar experience. Though my modem just blinked for under and hour and then all was good.

      And I second the notice that the installer is crap - just a bunch of advertising.

      You don't need any fancy additional software to access your cable modem ... I am amazed that anyone installed the software.

    6. Re:quick transition with Charter by Shook · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to boot into Windows, and install everything the "official way" to try to keep everything running smoothly

    7. Re:quick transition with Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Charter. I didn't even notice it was out. I guess my firewall/router handled whatever changes (if any) it had to make :-)

      If they switched us over to something new, great. I couldn't care less where they get the bandwidth from as long as it is there and I have fast, uncensored, reliable internet service.

  6. I think I'll be OK by SumDeusExMachina · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm posting from a Comcast connection right now, and I've heard various unconfirmed reports that Comcast has been frantically preparing their own backbone network over the past few weeks in preparation for exactly this kind of scenario.

    The only thing I'm really worried about right now is losing my e-mail account and having friends get their messages bounced before I can tell them my new address (whatever that may be). It's almost as bad as going through a change of area code with the phone company, only here, the grace period is a matter of days.

    --

    Is your company running tools written by ma
    1. Re:I think I'll be OK by Dudio · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only thing I'm really worried about right now is losing my e-mail account and having friends get their messages bounced before I can tell them my new address (whatever that may be).

      Do what I do - use an email forwarding service. I use iName, but Bigfoot also has free forwarding. Bigfoot limits you to 25 messages/day on their free accounts; iName has no limit AFAIK. I've been using iName for several years now, and the only problems I've had have been the occasional slow delivery. Nothing more than an hour or two though, and it's usually very fast.

    2. Re:I think I'll be OK by netsharc · · Score: 0

      Try Yahoo!, with POP3 access... I used iName, but then I suspected it lost some of my emails. Yahoo! with POP3 is good, although you have to agree that they'll send you ads in the mail, although I only get one every 2 months (I guess I'm not a demographically good market). They also support forwarding, but I prefer the POP3 access, that's one less server that has to catch your email before it lands in your computer.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    3. Re:I think I'll be OK by tshak · · Score: 2

      The only thing I'm really worried about right now is losing my e-mail account and having friends get their messages bounced before I can tell them my new address (whatever that may be). It's almost as bad as going through a change of area code with the phone company, only here, the grace period is a matter of days.

      Which is why you never use an email address that's tied to your Internet Connection!

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    4. Re:I think I'll be OK by foghorn19 · · Score: 1

      The only thing I'm really worried about right now is losing my e-mail account and having friends get their messages bounced before I can tell them my new address (whatever that may be).

      Get yourself a yahoo address and forward it to whervever your latest email account is. Simple.

    5. Re:I think I'll be OK by mmclean · · Score: 1

      I, also, am am posting from a comcast connection. Hopefully you are right, and comcast has been preparing for this scenario.

      I avoid the email account hassles with a @pobox.com account.

      BTW, I find it interesting that my @home email account is still able to get spam from att.net

      http://spamcop.net/sc?id=z26596551zc68cf4030d516 31 76eeca39350392ecez

  7. (Puzzled look on face) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how many people were actually cut off yesterday?

    1. Re:(Puzzled look on face) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just cut off 5 minutes ago. Sux.

    2. Re:(Puzzled look on face) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but if I had my access cut off, I wouldn't be posting able to post a reply to your message, fucktard

  8. New Mexico by rockclimbingtech · · Score: 0

    yup, yesterday all my friends with cable lost it at midnight.... they can always use dial up like us groundlings though

  9. Somewhat working by brocktune · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I changed DNS to the old Mediaone servers and I'm working again. My DHCP-generated IP address changed. Mail and news are not up yet.

    Details on how to change are here. I assume other folks can replace the "ga" in the URL with their state or city name. There was an email sent out last week with more details.

    1. Re:Somewhat working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was always connected to the old mediaone servers here in Minnesota. And I have had no problems whatsoever. Which I see as a GREAT thing!

  10. AT&T - mediacom by stick-boy · · Score: 1

    I'm in iowa too, I was under AT&T@Home, but it switched to mediacom about a month or 2 ago. my DNS was down this morning, but it came back up a few hours ago, and that's the only problems i've had. I guess I'm lucky that I have mediacom now...

    1. Re:AT&T - mediacom by XBL · · Score: 2

      Where in Iowa are you? I am in Waterloo, also under MediaCom

    2. Re:AT&T - mediacom by Lish · · Score: 1

      (not the poster you're replying to)

      My parents are in Bettendorf (Quad Cities), their Mediacom service has been up just fine with no DNS. I am crossing my fingers that it continues to be that way. I spent my Thanksgiving break wiring their bedrooms and kitchen with ethernet so that they could all share the cablemodem, I'd rather that not have been a waste.

      --
      "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
    3. Re:AT&T - mediacom by jimhill · · Score: 2

      Don't worry: all that time spent wiring will not be wasted. Worst-case, they can all share a 56k dialup!

      My parents are in Jeff City, MO, also under Mediacom after an AT&T unload. They lost their DNS but when I gave a fallback nameserver IP to my dad he was back in business. Mailservers were still working, too, which I find rather odd. Why pull the plug on your nameservers and leave the mailservers up?

      --
      Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    4. Re:AT&T - mediacom by stick-boy · · Score: 1

      i'm on waterloo's mediacom also. my DNS is still up but recently my mail server started saying that my account was inactive. luckily i never used my @home mail account.

    5. Re:AT&T - mediacom by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience in Kelseyville, California. Go mediacom!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. @home by Boronx · · Score: 1
    I'm with @home through Charter Cable, today the dns servers don't seem to work.



    Don't know if this is a planned outage or what, but I was able to hijack my old dialup's dns.

    1. Re:@home by domc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am with Charter as well, and my DNS is working fine. Try these:

      nameserver 24.196.64.39
      nameserver 24.196.64.40

      domc

    2. Re:@home by domc · · Score: 1

      BTW, for Charter people; try DHCP if you aren't having any luck. That's what I did, and I was then able to glean all of the new settings.

      domc

      Also, don't get discouraged if it doesn't work for you right now -- the service has been up and down for the last several hours.

    3. Re:@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went into Internet Explorer's Tools > Internet Options > Connections tab > LAN Settings and unchecked the Proxy Server box. After no Web access all day, now suddenly it's back!

    4. Re:@Home by crossconnects · · Score: 1

      I'm in a comcast area waiting for cable access for a long time.
      When i bought this place 5 1/2 years ago Time Warner was planning an internet access rollout within a couple of years. It was stopped when AT&T bought the cable network. Comcast bought it about a year ago and we're still waiting. They said it would be out in Sept or Oct, and we're still waiting. They then said they'd had a technical problem (wouldn't elaborate) and it would be available in Dec. We're still waiting.
      DSL is not an option. Paper clad copper won't carry the signal.

      --
      no big sig
  12. Good timing! by cperciva · · Score: 2

    I moved from Vancouver to Oxford, and from @Home to free university-supplied 100Mbps ethernet, a couple months ago.

    1. Re:Good timing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      free?

      You mean you don't pay tuition or room/board?

      PS - nobody gives a shit.

    2. Re:Good timing! by gmack · · Score: 1

      Not really .. shaw got a clue a long time ago and started on their own backbone. The only thing that broke/will break are the @home email adresses.

  13. dns isn't a crisis by Restil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guys.. you can use ANY dns server on the internet pretty much. Might be that tinsy bit extra resolving latency, but the crisis is minimal.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:dns isn't a crisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one find a good one?

    2. Re:dns isn't a crisis by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Or you can just install djbdns/BIND and run your own. It's trivial, even on Windows (Check out the DNS Server category at tucows)

    3. Re:dns isn't a crisis by Pathwalker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pick a large university near you, and do a whois on them to see what their nameservers are.
      They'll probably be a good choice.

    4. Re:dns isn't a crisis by redcliffe · · Score: 1

      Just use BIND 8. It will talk to the root servers.

    5. Re:dns isn't a crisis by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's great for some people (like me so far). EVERYBODY else that I know in State College, PA has lost their service. They've also taken people off who use DHCP.

      I don't know how much longer I have here....

    6. Re:dns isn't a crisis by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Yup, just make sure the dns server only allows connections from your own machine(s)... especially in bind's case...

      hrmm... what's that? a funny taste in my mouth? who'da thunk it?

    7. Re:dns isn't a crisis by jejones · · Score: 2

      Well, almost...@home tells you to use just "mail" for your mail server, so unless you have found out what your mail server's name really is, another DNS won't map that appropriately and you won't be able to get your email. (OTOH, I'm in Iowa, and still can't get my email anyway, even now that Mediacom has the DNS going again. Supposedly that will be back this morning; I hope it is, because I've been laid off, and this is the email address I put on the resumés I've submitted at the various job search sites...)

    8. Re:dns isn't a crisis by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      >so unless you have found out what your mail server's name really is

      it isn't that hard, and if you are using linux you almost certainly have already figured that out.

      we went from mediaone to AT&T @home a month ago in chicago and they wanted me to install their 'software' which pretty much just changed all the windows network settings.

      of course, i planned to hook my linux masq box back up as soon as the switch was over so i sacrificed a windows box to do the initial setup. they did tell you to use 'mail' for the pop and smtp servers in my mail client, the actual fqdn could be determined by looking in the windows networking properties.

      their 'software' had set up *.rdms2.il.home.com (obviously a local domain - rdms is rolling meadows in illinois) as the default domain to search, so I had simply to add that to 'mail' in my email client setup. conversion done, i unplugged the NT box I had set up for the purpose and hooked my little linux masq box back to the cable modem, released the dhcp release, got a new one, and was back in business.

      of course now i am fscked (AT&T @home went dark around 9 yesterday) i had mediaone for about 3 years with virtually no problems. the pointy heads at AT&T really screwed the pooch on this. @home has been in trouble for months, and they switched us over last month anyway. i've never gotten so much porn spam in my life.

      now i am one of the 'within ten days' customers. i can get to the web by dialing into work and then out on the http proxy server. i am pissed - if i had any real alternative, i would be dropping at&t and getting something else right now.

      bleah

  14. Nebraska seems OK for now... by Dark_Cobra87 · · Score: 0

    I've heard Cable in the Omaha area is still up; if it goes down I'll have a good laugh at my friends, since I have DSL...

  15. @Home stay online HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are one of the many disconnected today, here's something you can try to get back online:

    If your modem still has sync (cable modem is showing online, or solid cable light - depending on what modem you have) but have you no connectivity, set your IP and host information in statically, but specify non-@Home DNS numbers.

    This got me back online, so it might be worth your while to try it youself.

    1. Re:@Home stay online HOWTO by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      FYI,

      AT&T @Home service in Cupertino, CA is down. The lights on the modem are on, but changing DNS servers or typing IP addresses into the URL does not work. So it looks like the head-end is up, but nothing's getting routed.

      I still feel like my $1K/mo T1 is a rip-off, but hey, at least it's up! Although I've heard rumors that XO (the CLEC providing the circuit to HE.NET) is also having financial troubles.

      Looks like another win for the ILECs.

    2. Re:@Home stay online HOWTO by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      This only works if you can ping servers by number, of course, which I can't on AT&T's Seattle network. Right now I'm snoozing along on dialup. Someone wake me up when we're connected again.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    3. Re:@Home stay online HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the advice, I'm sure the people who can't get online will find it very helpful =)

      Seems people are giving status reports in reply to your post, so... Petaluma, CA, northern SF bay area, this morning the gateway was routing to itself and dropping packets, within hours the cable light was down and it's been out all day. Those AOL CDs are actually good for something.

    4. Re:@Home stay online HOWTO by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 0, Troll
      If you are one of the many disconnected today

      If I was disconnected today, how am I reading your comment? Or posting this snide remark in reply? :)

      --

      Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
    5. Re:@Home stay online HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dial-up. Twat.

  16. Comcast@HOME by omega9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've got access through Comcast@Home here in Richmond, VA. We're still up but I keep the green lights in the corner of my eye.

    Mail, News, and DNS servers are all still active on their original IPs. We have not received any official email from Comcast concerning the status of their network. They're either solid with their own network and backbone, or they're just waiting to die. Either way, I wish we would get informed.

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:Comcast@HOME by acvh · · Score: 1

      Comcast has been working on their own network for a while, but many of their networking staff have left recently, leaving the development in the hands of the "cable guys". They aren't planning on having anything available for subscribers until the end of January at the earliest.

      However, we're still up in NJ, so I'm not complaining yet.

    2. Re:Comcast@HOME by davis328 · · Score: 1

      My Comcast@HOME connection is still up in Montgomery County, Maryland. The only information I've been able to gather is from the comcast telephone hotline (1-888-433-6963), and they are currently reporting that there are no plans for an outage. Steven

    3. Re:Comcast@HOME by smertens · · Score: 1

      Just reporting in that Comcast in Prince George's County, MD (right next to Montgomery County, for those keeping score) is still up at this time.

    4. Re:Comcast@HOME by papa248 · · Score: 1

      I used to have AT&T BroadBand, but I found out that they sold the service to Comcast in Michigan. My comcast service does not say @Home, however... I suspect that we will be fine.

      --


      The higher, the fewer.
    5. Re:Comcast@HOME by PoiBoy · · Score: 1
      I used to have AT&T BroadBand, but I found out that they sold the service to Comcast in Michigan. My comcast service does not say @Home, however... I suspect that we will be fine.

      Right...I'm in Ann Arbor on Comcast, which used to be AT&T. We're still using Mediaone, thank God. I was getting worried yesterday when people were saying all Comcast users would be toast, then I realized we're on Mediaone still.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    6. Re:Comcast@HOME by irksome · · Score: 1

      Possibly the only good thing about MediaNone in Ann Arbor?

    7. Re:Comcast@HOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What problems?

      I have Comcast@Home (Prince George's County, MD) and have *not* been down at all.

      In fact, I gave the system a *complete bath* (after backing up important files, I wiped out the hard drive, and reinstalled Windows XP Professional, re-input my computer name, workgroup, and left everything else alone) and reinstalled all drivers (or updated drivers) as needed. No problems with Web, mail, news, IM, or anything else.

  17. still online in champaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UIUC cable modem service was down this morning for a while but has been fine the rest of the day. Maybe At&t can fix the terrible, terrible service we have had since Oct.

  18. Insight@Home is still up by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Insight Communications has released the following statement today to their customers:

    Insight, along with other cable operators, is currently in the tail end of positive negotiations with @Home. At this time, we fully expect to maintain connectivity for our Insight@Home customer base.

    We recognize that certain communities in our Central Illinois service areas have seen an interruption in service this morning due to an @Home error. We are working diligently to correct this issue and expect full service to be restored today. We apologize to these customers for any inconvenience this has caused.

    Thank you for your continued patience as we work through this issue.

    1. Re:Insight@Home is still up by r1ckt3r · · Score: 1

      I was fully expecting my service to be down this morning, I actually did a little dance of joy when it wasn't. I had heard rumors from my friends at High Speed Access that we could expect 45 days of downtime. I'm glad the rumors were false. Is there a possibility of downtime later down the line?

    2. Re:Insight@Home is still up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it was down this morning, in the Champaign Urbana area (IL) when i woke up around 7

      after i got home from bowling it was back up (around 12-1)

    3. Re:Insight@Home is still up by r1ckt3r · · Score: 1

      awesome, i'm just hoping they don't pull the plug later

  19. dns problems? use another dns server then :) by Indy1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    use this if your dns is not working.......

    4.2.2.1 (vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net)

    yes, thats a real dns server :) and a wonderfully easy address to remember as well. I use it as my secondary dns on the rare occasions when my isp's dns (san.rr.com) is choking.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  20. more dns #'s by loraksus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    4.2.2.2
    4.2.2.3
    provided to you by verizon and painfully easy to remember.

    I'm still shocked about how this is happening in the USA. I mean, if it happened in some eastern bloc country, or some nation in Africa that is very corrupt / piss poor, I could understand, but here?
    No offense to people in those countries, btw, it seems that the telecommunications infrastructure in most countries is beter than that of the usa.
    I honestly don't understand why the service costs so much in the usa - In BC, Canada, 1.5mb down / 768 up, 2 static ip's for $40 a month CANADIAN! Here, I pay $55ish for a whole 768dn / 100k up, a dynamic ip and shitty ping. WTF. The Canadian dollar is worth less, so it stands to reason that the equipment costs more for the Canadian providers (because they take in canadian $, not us $) . . .

    bah, at least my dsl provider looks like they will be in service for the next month or so....

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:more dns #'s by loraksus · · Score: 2

      of course, unless you know /.'s ip, the above info is kinda useless. . .
      smacks self.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada has more high speed subscribers than the US and is said to be the most "wired" country in the world.

    3. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given Canada's large area and small population, I can imagine that there's quite a distance between you and the next log house. Communication systems become important to maintain social contacts despite large distances.

    4. Re:more dns #'s by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Funny
      Let's do a little reverse-DNSing, shall we?

      4.2.2.1: vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net
      4.2.2.2: vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net
      4.2.2.3: vsnc-lc.sys.gtei.net
      4.2.2.4: i-will-not-steal-service.gtei.net

      I guess that's the curse of having a memorable IP address...
      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:more dns #'s by eracerblue · · Score: 1

      I'm on Shaw's cablemodem service (previously shaw@home). They've been prepping for this for months now, and everything's up full tilt. Members were encouraged over that time to painlessly switch from @home.com to @shaw.ca setttings.

      Great job Shaw.

      Yeah, it's damn cheap up here. I'm on my second free month of service now (after my sign up), and when I do start paying it'll be $40/mo CAD. Yes, that's $25 and change in USD.

      Oh and, fast too. On my P100 rustbucket, I'm getting 500K/sec down, 300K/sec up rating from [www.dslreports.com/stest]. Durring what I'd call fairly peak time - a rainy Saturday afternoon.

      join the revoloution kids. [shaw.ca]
      (no... I don't work for them... but they should be paying be for this post!)

    6. Re:more dns #'s by isorox · · Score: 2

      What self respecting geek *doesnt* know slashdots IP?

      Or at least a few nameservers, or a telnetable ip with dns resolving on.

    7. Re:more dns #'s by jallen02 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This gets said quite a bit. "Why does america xyz telecommunications service suck SOOOOO bad compared to abc countries xyz service?"

      Most other countries in the world are smaller. In some cases you can service an entire country with a stupidly small amount of infrastructure. Here in the states we are a huge sprawling country and rolling out a service to the ENTIRE country at once is plain damn tough. It is huge. Infrastructure takes time. It costs MONEY a lot more money to deploy that much infrastructure. Then you have to look at the demand for such services. Even at 40 a pop.

      I always get annoyed when people say "Why does'nt america have cool cellular networks like europe etc."

      because america is a big place and it costs money!

      ... Just my .02.

      Jeremy

    8. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is also the country where Enron was able to cook their books ($90 stock a year ago), but has a future bleaker than BSD's, and a stock price that makes LNUX look good.

      it's not entirely fair to compare prices across countries though, as there are hidden costs (different regulations, subsidies, etc).

      PS - I bet all those liberals who insisted the Bushies sell all their Enron stock a year ago are fucking pissed :)

    9. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a fair comment, but I'd like to point out that geographically Canada is even larger than the US, but our population density is less. That should make it even more difficult to provide consistent network infrastructure, but somehow we manage. :)

      On the otherhand, 70% of Canadian internet traffic routes through the US, so...

    10. Re:more dns #'s by ChenLing · · Score: 2

      Ha! I didn't think you were serious until I did the nslookups myself. That is **waaaayyyy** too funny!

      --
      "You have the option of insanity. I do not. And that makes me crazy!" - Brian to Angela, My So-Called Life
    11. Re:more dns #'s by csbruce · · Score: 1

      I can imagine that there's quite a distance between you and the next log house.

      What?! Some Canadians have log houses?! And I've been living in an igloo all this time. So much for summertime water damage!

    12. Re:more dns #'s by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Actually, Canada is highly urbanized, even moreso than the US, I think. 13.6-million of 31.0-million Canadians live in six major cities. (19.6-million in 25 cities.)

      Also, Canada's population tends to be concentrated on a 200km band along the US border, with the bulk of the northern area being wasteland. (It's not necessarily that they like Americans so much, just that lower latitudes have better climates.) A straight line is a simple topology to match a network to. The US population pattern is more "two-dimensional", making distance a much more expensive problem for network infrastructure.

    13. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada's overall population density is far less than the US's, but your average URBAN population density is significantly higher (largely due to the fact that you actually do regional landplanning up there, something that's almost entirely unheard of in the US).

      That makes it much cheaper to provide broadband to a high percentage of the population.

    14. Re:more dns #'s by badzilla · · Score: 1

      I always get annoyed when people say "Why does'nt america have cool cellular networks like europe etc."
      because america is a big place and it costs money!


      By "cool cellular networks" you probably mean GSM, which is used by 150 or so countries worldwide. You really think the US is bigger than all those countries added together? Some are quite big even on their own, like say Australia...

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    15. Re:more dns #'s by prowsej · · Score: 0

      The Canadian government subsidizes internet access in order to make it viable. That solution would simply be branded communist in the U.S., no doubt ...

    16. Re:more dns #'s by csbruce · · Score: 1

      On the otherhand, 70% of Canadian internet traffic routes through the US, so...

      Such as the packets from Rogers@Home and (oxymoronic) AT&T Canada in the twin cities of Ottawa ON and Hull QC. My packets go through Ottawa ON, Toronto ON, Buffalo NY, Hartford CT, Cambridge MA, Chicago IL, Toronto ON, Ottawa ON, and finally Hull QC. Previously, I've had packets going through Palo Alto CA.

      If they would just peer in Toronto, my ssh sessions would be ten times as good and the US backbones would be less heavily loaded. Maybe Rogers without the @Home will figure out how to peer with other networks in Canada. Part of @Home's problems ought to be that they needlessly shipped so many packets over half the continent.

    17. Re:more dns #'s by ahde · · Score: 2

      99% of australia doesn't even have analog cellular service, genius

    18. Re:more dns #'s by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

      4.2.2.4: i-will-not-steal-service.gtei.net

      Kinda stupid, actually. "Hey, we've left our DNS servers accessible to the public with no access control, but please don't use them unless you're paying us"

      Most people configure their DNS servers to allow anyone to do a recursive lookup, because usually there's no point in using someone else's DNS as opposed to running your own or using your ISPs.

      If they wanted to prevent the public from using their DNS servers, they would have one set of servers only accessible to their own customers, and another set accessible to the world, but which only served domains they were hosting. It's very easy to do, so it's silly of them to insinuate that we're "stealing" by using name servers which have been deliberately left open.

    19. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i had to move out of my igloo. the heat from the servers kept melting the walls.

    20. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also kind of stupid that you left your car on the street with only those puny door locks. That's why I stole it.

    21. Re:more dns #'s by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's also kind of stupid that you left your car on the street with only those puny door locks. That's why I stole it.

      I think you got the wrong car. I left mine in the street with doors and windows open, the keys in the ignition, and the engine running, with a sign in the window saying "thanks for not stealing me".

    22. Re:more dns #'s by FunkMonkey#9 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Canadian dollar is worth less, so it stands to reason that the equipment costs more for the Canadian providers (because they take in canadian $, not us $) . . .

      There's a couple of very good reasons why high-speed service is a lot cheaper in Canada, and neither of them are the relative strength of the Canadian dollar.

      First and foremost, we have the CRTC. Those guys are in charge of regulating the Telecommunications industry, and they do a pretty good job (for the most part).

      Secondly, the major difference between telecom in Canada and the US is that phone companies in the US are run in their respective states. In Canada, telecommunications are regulated across Canada as a whole, which allows for lower overhead so far as providing amalgamated service to the entire country.

      Whew. Way too hot (25C+) in the office this evening. I hate working weekends; can't think straight. If anyone else comes up with something, feel free to, you know, discuss...

      --

      -- The One and Only NotMike.

    23. Re:more dns #'s by LinuxHam · · Score: 3

      so it's silly of them to insinuate that we're "stealing" by using name servers which have been deliberately left open

      The servers haven't necessarily been *deliberately* left open. Bringing up www.gtei.net shows this to be some kind of unwanted stepchild between genuity and bbn. Wouldn't surprise me that whoever runs the network is doing a shoddy job at that dank little corner of their network.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    24. Re:more dns #'s by kilrogg · · Score: 1
      When I was with rogers (in Vancouver) I used to have that exact same problem, all my packets would be routed to Toronto, then to Buffalo, etc.

      Then we were switched over to Shaw, they have their own network and connect driectly to other ISPs in Canada and the US. So packets for California go through Seatle, packets for bell go straight to bellnexxia (staying in Canada), etc. Much more sane. Rogers is so backwards.

    25. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your insurance may not pay, but the guy that steals it will get charged with the same thing.

    26. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shaw saw this a long time ago. They started over a year ago when they were getting complaints about the services provided by @home. As far as i know they were the first to move to their own datacenter which opened in Calgary at least 6 months ago.

    27. Re:more dns #'s by kilrogg · · Score: 1
      The Canadian government subsidizes internet access in order to make it viable.

      Any links to back that up?

    28. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? my igloo hasn't melted yet... the ice keeps the cpu nice and cool, while at the same time the machine helps to lower my firewood costs by heating the place... now, if only i can figure out how to cook some blubber on it...

    29. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that the CRTC makes sure we don't listen or watch too much foreign content. We might become American, British or even worse, French.

    30. Re:more dns #'s by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      I honestly don't understand why the service costs so much in the usa

      It varies. I'm on Cablevison in the US, and I get 8 MBs down, 1.0 up for $29 US.

      15 ms ping to most places, too.

    31. Re:more dns #'s by Agent+Green · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, 4.2.2.4 was set up as an intentional joke. All those servers are maintained by Genuity, and one of the guys in NetEng decided it'd be cute to toss in a funny reverse-resolve for the fourth address.

      Bear in mind, that 4.2.2.4 doesn't work... :)

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    32. Re:more dns #'s by gordguide · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, I'm in the wasteland (51 degrees N) and I've had my hispeed since 1995. Rural users have microwave-based wireless hispeed options, it don't matter where you live here.
      The entire province (pop. less than 1 million and a quarter million square miles) finished the fibre infastructure in 1981.
      As for the population being within 200 km from the border, let's be more specific. Everybody in Ontario, Quebec and BC is within 200km; since that represents 60% of the national population, I suppose you could say that. Of course, everyone in Ontario and Quebec live south of the 49th parallel, too.

    33. Re:more dns #'s by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      Oh come on, @home doesn't exactly service the entire country, infact they cherry picked the prime regions.

    34. Re:more dns #'s by gordguide · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Canadain government subsidises internet access...
      A crock of shit. Not a dime. Nada.
      There is a governing body (the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission, like the FTC) which has set a limit of $45.00 for basic highspeed. If you don't feel you can provide for that price then don't. All the providers are publicly listed firms* and they all make money. Strangely, most don't even charge that much.
      If they wanted to charge more, they would have to apply to the CRTC. This is the same as cableTV; so far in 25 years they have never failed to approve a cable rate increase when asked, so I don't see a major stumbling block here.

      SaskTel is publicly owned an operates in Saskatchewan only. They provide hispeed DSL and TVoverPhone service, as well as local and long distance phone service. Their $40 a month DSL service loses so much money, they were only able to provide $97 million as a dividend to the province last year.

    35. Re:more dns #'s by nettdata · · Score: 2
      I always get annoyed when people say "Why does'nt america have cool cellular networks like europe etc."

      because america is a big place and it costs money!


      I hear ya... I used to do some web work for a Canadian travel company, and we had to put in some of the wierdest business alert rules you can imagine. Such things as "if you want to fly to Toronto, and rent a car to take a nice leisurely scenic drive to Vancouver, don't! It will take you 4 days to drive half-way across the country". It was a bit of a shock for European travellers to be in a country where you couldn't drive across the thing in 4 or 5 hours.

      Same thing goes for the wireless headspace.
      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    36. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, 90% of Canadians live on less than 1/5
      of Canada's total area. It should be easy to
      network most canadians, until you try to
      network Nunavut, Yukon and the Northwest
      Territories :)

    37. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USD45 for 5MBit down and 768k up over here in Sweden ;)

    38. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your insurance may not pay, but the guy that steals it will get charged with the same thing.

      I think maybe you forgot the part where you actally make your point?

    39. Re:more dns #'s by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      Please don't steal access to my website. I'll sell you a copy (for your own use only) on CD for $19.99.

      This reminds me of the story about google finding things it "wasn't meant to find" on the net. If you don't want people to access the resource - don't put it on the internet :-)

    40. Re:more dns #'s by matlhDam · · Score: 1

      You are so, so right. Y'know, given that the analogue networks were (almost) completely shut down a year or two ago. :P

    41. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to know why things blow chunks in the US, it's because in Canada (the example you use), Government Regulation forced all the local telcos to follow the same standards and implement the same innovations, whether they want to or not.

      In the US, rampant competition has lead to many cost savings measures which insure that the network infrastructure blows chunks.

      Competition doesn't always mean better service.

    42. Re:more dns #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, can you get cablemodem in the Northwest Territory?

    43. Re:more dns #'s by geminix3 · · Score: 1

      BWAH-HAH-HAH-HA!!!!!

      this thread is friggin KILLING me.

      oh, my achin' butt....

  21. Re:What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, *nix has had a hosts file since back when you Windows 'tards were still using WINS, and even before you found your way onto the 'net at all. But thanks for playing!

  22. Free DNS Servers by Enonu · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Do they exist? I know my ISP has a few backup servers, but for times like this, it'd be a nice piece of information to know.

    1. Re:Free DNS Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These will probably work:

      uu.net nameserver = auth210.ns.uu.net
      uu.net nameserver = auth00.ns.uu.net
      uu.net nameserver = auth60.ns.uu.net
      uu.net nameserver = auth200.ns.uu.net

      auth210.ns.uu.net internet address = 195.129.12.74
      auth00.ns.uu.net internet address = 198.6.1.65
      auth60.ns.uu.net internet address = 198.6.1.181
      auth200.ns.uu.net internet address = 195.129.12.82

    2. Re:Free DNS Servers by Disk+Pickable · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Free DNS Servers by Eric+Green · · Score: 2

      % rpm -q bind
      bind-9.1.3-4
      % rpm -q caching-nameserver
      caching-nameserver-7.2-1
      % rpm -q redhat-release
      redhat-release-7.2-1
      % cat /etc/resolv.conf
      domain inhouse
      nameserver 127.0.0.1
      %

      Yep, it's there. (And if you're running Windows... why are you reading Slashdot?)

      -E

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    4. Re:Free DNS Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      165.95.31.1
      208.201.155.21
      206.104.144.4
      204.177.232.9

    5. Re:Free DNS Servers by TimKnight · · Score: 1

      Because I like intelligent thought as well as useful information.
      V/R,
      Tim Knight

  23. whois attbi.com by goodwid · · Score: 1

    I used the DNS listings from their whois entry. Worked just fine.

    --

    The net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. -- John Gilmore
    1. Re:whois attbi.com by goodwid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Duh. I shoulda included the numbers.

      NS1.ATTBI.COM 204.127.198.4
      NS2.ATTBI.COM 216.148.227.68

      There.

      --

      The net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. -- John Gilmore
  24. Northern Cali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After checking in with a couple friends today, it's official, our AT&T@Home cable modems are completely off-line. This isn't just dead DNS, this is a blinking cable modem light representing no service at all. Stories are reporting 2-10 days outage, and from past experience, I'd lean to the longer timeframe. Here's AT&T's Press Release on the subject. -T

    1. Re:Northern Cali by jkc120 · · Score: 1

      I have block sync...but I cannot get a dhcp address, nor does setting up a static ip (which used to work before) do me much good. I can ping my gateway, but nothing gets past it.

      --
      "I drank what?" -Socrates
  25. AT&T MediaOne Customers Uneffected by parp · · Score: 1

    I've been online all day with AT&T Broadband through their MediaOne network. All is well here in MA.

    1. Re:AT&T MediaOne Customers Uneffected by skriefal · · Score: 1

      Ditto here in Minnesota. We were originally a MediaOne outlet, then converted to RoadRunner, then to @Home after AT&T purchased MediaOne. Everything still seems to be working fine -- even the home.excite.com "homepage" is still working, despite claims from AT&T that it's gone forever.

    2. Re:AT&T MediaOne Customers Uneffected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Stockton, CA and service hasn't even blinked. Used to be MediaOne RoadRunner till ATT bought them out here but we never switched to any @home email/news/dns servers. Everyone here still uses their @mediaone.net email addys. Guess they were able to use all the old links to stay online here since we never fully went @home.

      Just currious but does this mean now ATT will offer $207 million for @home down from the around $307 million? They did axe nearly a million customers unplugging ATT. I'm sure that hurts @home's value.

    3. Re:AT&T MediaOne Customers Uneffected by aenea · · Score: 1

      Same here. AT&T's been saying the whole time that the old Mediaone network wouldn't be affected.

    4. Re:AT&T MediaOne Customers Uneffected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a transitioned MediaOne customer. I moved from their network to @home about 1 year ago when they did a DOCSIS upgrade. Everybody in the suburbs of chicago being served by ATT are down.

  26. converted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been converted to at&t broadband without downloading the "hose your system in a box" tool.

  27. AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by loggia · · Score: 3, Informative

    Glad to see AT&T couldn't get away with their usual tactics again.

    With NorthPoint (former major DSL provider), a bankruptcy judge let AT&T buy NorthPoint's DSL lines for a song and let them cut off all of NorthPoint's 400,000 customers.

    Sound stupid? It was.

    Thank you, oh Judge Thomas Carlson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Francisco for at least giving the bondholders, the company and the customers some options, no matter how few they might be...

    1. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The news reports I've seen indicate that the judge sympathizes with the plight of the subscribers, but has legally determined that they are not parties to this case. In short, a bankrupt company is not required to continue service unless there is a public safety reason to do so. In short, write your congressman.

    2. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by Rich+Katz · · Score: 1

      Yep. You have to die to get service around here...

      My question is:
      1. Who looks out for the public interest? And how do we get public interest to the table?

      2. What rights to users have as contractors?
      3. Why are our bankrupcy laws so archiac that they can defy the public interest and cause damage to innocent parties?

      The entire telecommunications manufacturing, telecom delivery, and software industries, and e-commerce sectors - and the U.S. economy as a whole are being damaged and further threatenned by a headless AT&T and a bunch of greedy cable companies!

      So my last question is:
      4. Which luddite numbskull lobby-debt-ladden ideologue in the White House thinks this is in any way good for the economy or that it can be fixed by simply having another "tax break?"

    3. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, while you are suffering from the loss of highspeed internet service, 2 people I know are probably going to lose their jobs from @home in a highly shittly local economy. HAND. There is no 'public interest' for any of you.

    4. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by sbrown123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AT&T was not to blame for this. They offered to buy the bankrupt company. I hate to say it, but when your bankrupt, any offer is a good offer. But the bondholders at Excite were a bit arrogant and felt that by threating AT&T and the cable companys with cutting service they could force AT&T to buy them at a higher cost.

      That was extreme stupidity on thier part. It now appears AT&T, and maybe all the cable providers, are migrating away. What does that leave? A bankrupt Excite with no takers. Those bond holders now hold a stack of crap paper with no value.

      I applaud AT&T for thier resolute stand in this matter. I hope those greedy bond holders get what they deserve.

      For those who feel AT&T and the cables are just greedy companies....they are. But they do care about thier customers and have done thier best to continue thier service. Excites move to shut off service just shows their business model which explains much of why they are bankrupt. Goodbye Excite I wont miss you.

    5. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by CaptDeuce · · Score: 1

      I applaud AT&T for thier resolute stand in this matter.

      I was a Northpoint customer and went without DSL service for nearly two months. Nothing to applaud there.

      I hope those greedy bond holders get what they deserve.

      What, a better deal? More than 30 cents on the dollar? How about this: what kind of company buy equipment and leaves customers to fend for themselves? No applause here, dude. It would take a lot for me to ever pay AT&T for anything in the future.

      --
      "Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein
    6. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the previous luddite-numbskull-lobby-caused-the-crappy-economy- because-he-was-asleep-at-the-wheel-in-the-White-Ho use didn't pay more attention to the concerns of the Tech industry instead of bagging interns.

    7. Re:AT&T Tried This Before with NorthPoint by protovirus · · Score: 1

      Ah, but AT&T did get away with it. Let's review. Excite is bankrupt and knows AT&T wants to buy their badly run company. Excite tries to force AT&T to renegotiate a deal that they agreed to previously...oh but..wait...we can't make any money. Whaaa. Look, all excite was trying to do is force AT&T into a renegotiation so they coudl make money..then their stock would rise...making it more expensive for AT&T to buy when Excite has already proven how badly it is run. If you were AT&T would you have done it? C'mon. Last year when AT&T Broadband was in the hole and sinking they reorganized their company and you know what? It worked. In fact AT&T BB is AT&T's brightest asset by far right now. I am glad Excite is going down: They controlled access for Charter/Comcast/AT&T and others and to me that isn't choice for the customer.

  28. State by State Threads - Iowa by jd142 · · Score: 1

    How about making a thread for each affected state, for easier use by people looking for info?

    I'll start the Iowa thread.

    Iowa City, now Mediacom as of about 4 months ago, appears to be up as of 4:30 central time. I think that's 23:30 GMT 1/1/01, but I may be off an hour.

    We had DNS problems this morning, but I added the university's dns servers and got back up immediately. Seems to be working now just fine, although a little slow.

  29. Locations of hosts files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *nix's : /etc/hosts
    win9x's : windows/hosts.sam
    winnt's : windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts

    1. Re:Locations of hosts files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. win9x and friends can still use just windows/hosts.

    2. Re:Locations of hosts files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hosts.sam is a sample file. It's never parsed or used. The proper file is hosts (no extension).

  30. Perhaps... by bteeter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DSL wasn't such a bad way to go after all. Verizon isn't going away anytime soon, the service is fast, reliable and always on.

    Maybe this will be how the battle of DSL vs Cable will be decided - in bankruptcy court.

    Take care,

    Brian
    --
    Come and get a free Palm m100 --

    1. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just try getting verizon to upgrade the old bell atlantic systems to dsl. in my area, they say another two to three years and we've only a few million people.

  31. Some differences that I've noticed. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    No longer have the (city)1.(state).home.com, just an abbreviation of the city.state.

    Insted of the 24.X it is now 66.X.X.X.

    Here's one pisser I've noticed, it does not like you to try to do the static IP address.
    Kinda annoying, as I have ICS setup to my Mac and it is *dog slow* when run with DHCP for some reason.

    Well, gotta tweak and see if that shitty upload cap has been removed too.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  32. Re:What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, by the time WINS (which implies TCP/IP) came around, DNS was up and running everywhere. Us tards generally used 'auto-configuring' protocols like IPX and AppleTalk, and ignored that crap from IBM until it got layered onto tcp/ip.

  33. Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know if any one noticed this... but posting DNS Server addresses on the web probably won't do people who can't reach a DNS server much good.

    Although the addresses are nice to have for reference... I doubt posting this information here is going to be very useful for someone already have it.

    1. Re:Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble.. by domc · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that most of us geeks have access to more than one computer/network -- right? So, it is useful for *us*.

      domc

      BTW, just to prove my point -- there seem to be a lot of cable subscribers posting on this thread.

    2. Re:Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the addresses are nice to have for reference... I doubt posting this information here is going to be very useful for someone already have it.

      I don't know about that. There are probably quite a few people (myself included) who have reverted to using dial-up until thier service is restored. Fortunately for me I was able to continue using my cable modem once I learned about changing my DNS servers.

    3. Re:Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I am using one of the poster's suggestions right now. The one about finding a college close to you for dns. The reason is because some sites resolve while others will not.

  34. AT&T press release by Mark19960 · · Score: 2, Informative

    here it is: http://www.att.com/press/item/0,1354,4100,00.html it just seems like this is typical of AT&T they want it, so they will try to get it cheap, then cut the users loose. looks like the victim is once again, the consumer.

    1. Re:AT&T press release by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1
  35. More bandwidth for the rest of us by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm, with Excite pulling the plug on a large portion of its subscribers (AT&T), shouldn't that free up quite a bit of bandwith for the rest of the @Home customers (Insight, Comcast, Cox)?

    Maybe now I can return to the days of 50ms CounterStrike ping that I had in back January. Suhweet!

    Of course, that is until Excite pulls this shit again in 2 months.

  36. AT&T is over 50% fine by psicE · · Score: 1

    AT&T has moved 10% of their customers over from Excite@Home to their own service, but that's an understatement. AT&T Broadband, as it now exists, was formed from the merger of TCI and MediaOne under the AT&T Broadband brand name. TCI was one of the three Excite@Home core companies (also Comcast and Cox). MediaOne was using their own network, but the RoadRunner portal; as part of the purchase agreement, AT&T would switch MediaOne over to the Excite@Home portal by 31 December 2001, which they did this summer, but they kept MediaOne on its own network. About 50% of AT&T's customers were already using this network, so when AT&T extended the network and switched 10% of the old TCI customers over to it, they really have about 60% of their cable customers already running fine. (I'm running off a MediaOne connection in Boston now, and I had no downtime at all.)

  37. DNS Problems -- solved by Wanker · · Score: 3, Informative

    One good solution for us linux-heads with home networks is to set up a caching-only DNS server. This is as simple as installing the "caching-nameserver" RPM (along with the bind RPM, of course). Then just configure all your servers to point to your caching nameserver host for DNS and you won't be at the mercy of AT&Ts nameservers any more.

    This let me bypass the AT&T nameservers that were having problems and get back online in no time.

    -----
    To test it first use this:

    $ nslookup
    > lserver
    Default server:
    Address: #53
    > www.yahoo.com
    Server:
    Address: #53

    Non-authoritative answer:
    www.yahoo.com canonical name = www.yahoo.akadns.net
    Name: www.yahoo.akadns.net
    Address: 216.115.102.77
    ... and so on ...
    > exit
    $

    -----
    As I mentioned in a posting under the old article, static IP allocations are on hold until AT&T sorts out which networks go where in their internal network configuration databases. Those of us with static IP allocations will just have to wait a few weeks. (However, I've been told by DHCP users that generally AT&T does not aggressively recycle IPs, so even DHCP-based IPs tend to be fairly stable.)

    I should also add that the new AT&T DHCP equipment seems to work with linux's "pump" DHCP client, whereas the old Excite@Home equipment in my area did not.

    1. Re:DNS Problems -- solved by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

      People laughed at me and thought i was crazy when i told them I ran a DNS server on my mac incase the @Home DNS ever went out so i could leech off of my cache. The fools, who is laughing now :)

      --
      (Score:0, Interesting)
    2. Re:DNS Problems -- solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I should also add that the new AT&T DHCP
      > equipment seems to work with linux's "pump"
      > DHCP client, whereas the old Excite@Home
      > equipment in my area did not.

      My NetGear RP114 WebSafe Router DHCP client can't pick up DNS entries from the AT&T DHCP server. So I got a list of servers to try in case the one I discovered using the Linux "pump" DHCP client goes away.

  38. Offtopic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T said it had already migrated some 86,000 customers in Oregon and Washington to an AT&T Broadband service and would move remaining customers in 2-10 days.

    Oregon seems to be one of the leading states these days when it comes to having your shit together. After their pioneering anti-spam law, their anti-Ashcroft stance recently, and other generally progressive legislation (and MINDSET), fucking over your customers is the LAST thing anyone wants to do in Oregon. It would be on my list of must-see places if it weren't for the weather. Someday I'll get there to check it out.
  39. Redundancy by Longing · · Score: 1, Funny

    All my friends used to laugh at me when I told them I have both DSL and a Cable Modem.

    Who's laughing now?

    1. Re:Redundancy by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

      i'm still laughing... for the months you paid twice the ammount of what normal internet usage costs, you get 3 or 4 days extra before most of the @home community sign up for another service provider...

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    2. Re:Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have a two year supply of canned corn in your basement, dontcha?

    3. Re:Redundancy by Traxton1 · · Score: 1
      Maybe not such a bad idea. I know that if you happen to have not just one, but 2 free lines you can set it up with your ISP to connect through both of them (assuming 2 modems too) for faster speeds. If you could work the same thing with the DSL and cable (I have no idea...) that would provide for some really fast downloading when both are up, and still the quickness of either one if one happens to go down.

    4. Re:Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do your friends laugh at you when you tell them that you masturbate with both left and right hands?

      dickwad

    5. Re:Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am for one, you giant nerd you.

    6. Re:Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been trying to get BOTH for the last year, but I'm "stuck" with cable and a dial up connection. So if cable goes down, I am not stranded.

      And as for the laughing part, people used to laugh at me for actually backing up my data.

  40. @Home by psirix · · Score: 1

    Hello. I have Comcast @Home, and I was a little worried once I heard that @Home dropped AT&T. I was wondering if anyone knew what Comcast is doing, I think I heard that they are putting up their own network, but how long will I be out with Internet Access? I might have to go buy a $12 56k Modem and get a netzero account if worst comes to worst.

  41. I am impressed... by abh · · Score: 1

    As someone who has a long history of problems with AT&T @Home, as the shutdown deadline approached I had planned to lose connectivity, probably for a few days. I must say I am impressed with AT&T.


    I was online until about 01:00 today and did not lose connection. When I got up this morning I had no connectivity. I followed the instructions that AT&T had sent to all subscribers via email and snail mail, and lo and behold, AT&T's backup network was in place! My total time lost was maybe 10 minutes to reconfigure my router/firewall.

  42. Old Skewl MediaOne customers are fine by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Informative
    In fact the entire state of Massachusetts is probably fine. Strangely enough, I expected a rollover to new DNS servers and a new IP address when @home cut us off, but I think the network here in Massachusetts must largely be old MediaOne stuff that AT&T bought along with MediaOne, since my DNS servers (all 3 of them) and routes outward and inward appear completely intact. Email is probably out, but I've never used their email service so I wouldn't know. In fact, I wouldn't even know there was a problem at all if I didn't read /. (and CNN.com).


    I wish we still had the old RoadRunner service - dunno why the hell AT&T BB dropped them for Excite@Home a few months ago - I guess because the rest of the AT&T BB customers are on @home, but I would gladly pay an extra 5 bucks a month if RR had jacked our rates up as I think they did with lots of their customers, if they had given us a good, solid reliable network. When will people get it through their thick skulls - I don't WANT content from my ISP, the excite part of Excite@Home was therefore useless to me and anyone who is halfway clueful, and the @home part had the worst service ever. What a moronic move on AT&T's part.

    1. Re:Old Skewl MediaOne customers are fine by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      When will people get it through their thick skulls - I don't WANT content from my ISP, the excite part of Excite@Home was therefore useless to me and anyone who is halfway clueful, and the @home part had the worst service ever.

      The morons in AT&T management were probably trying to copy the AOL model. What people like that cannot understand is that AOL have already captured the market for internet access targetted at clueless dweebs. The people who want that type of service will buy it from AOL anyway.

      The first I knew that Excite had become involved was when I got the mail explaining how my cable modem service might go out. This appears to explain why I now get two bills for my cable modem, one that always reads zero and the other that has a balance. And these guys wonder why they sometime don't get paid for a month.

      I suspect that what AT&T have done is to get the service delivery part of the network up. The piece that tends to be time consuming is dealing with billing issues etc - the part that excite was meant to be doing. So a few hundered folk will probably be able to steal internet service for a month or two.

      The ironic thing is that the bondholders turned off the network to try to get more cash out of AT&T by holding their customers to ransom, the end result of their machinations is likely to be that they get nothing.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:Old Skewl MediaOne customers are fine by protovirus · · Score: 1

      Roadrunner had to be dropped due to their involvement with Time Warner as per the merger agreement (MediaOne, AT&T).

  43. AT&T@Home down in Schaumburg, IL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in Schaumburg, IL and have AT&T@Home (previously TCI) and my cable modem has no sync now. It was sync'd up early this morning and working after the Excite@home cutoff time.

    Not sure how long until it comes back, the AT&T support saids it may take 7 days.

  44. Medicom@Home --- Still Alive and Kicking by DocChaos · · Score: 1

    I have to commend Medicom for keeping their service going strong. Besides the afformentioned DNS problems(Was over night and back by 9am CST), there has been zero interruption of service... Lets hope that they can work out a deal with Excite@Home, or it may be back to dialup for quite a number of people....
    DocChaos

    --
    DocChaos -------- I may be crazy, but then again I may be crazy.
  45. Off Topic, but Important: Ginger/IT To Be Revealed by Fortyseven · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I guess none of the Slashdot fruitcakes thought it important that Kamen is gonna reveal what Ginger/IT is on Good Morning America this coming week, possibly Monday. Why the hell nobody seems to be picking up this story is beyond me. I submitted it, but as typical, no response...

  46. test by joehahn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    raise your hand if you are not here.

    --
    *I used to be quite irreverent and ignorant. I am probably much smarter now. I seem to realize this every 45 days or so.
  47. Covad offers free swith to DSL for @Home users by mr.crutch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just saw this press release stating that Covad is offering @Home customers the opportunity to switch any @Home customer to DSL for free (free hardware & install).

    Might be worth investigating...

    1. Re:Covad offers free swith to DSL for @Home users by leonbev · · Score: 1
      Only problem with this idea is that Covad declared chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in August. They aren't in very good financial shape, either, and could also cut you off your service in a few months. Check out the story here

      You just might end up trading one failing ISP for another.

    2. Re:Covad offers free swith to DSL for @Home users by funk_master_db · · Score: 1

      Stay away from Covad. At work we had a Covad DSL line through Voicenet w/ 5 static IPs. Once they heard that Voicenet was going to dump Covad at the end of the month in favor of Verizon's DSL network, Covad unplugged all 400+ Voicenet customers before their contract was up. We were without access for 10 days while we waited for Verizon to finish setting up our T1 line. Covad's situation isn't much better or different from Excite@Home's!

  48. Re:Off Topic, but Important: Ginger/IT To Be Revea by zhensel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You're right. I really expected Slashdot to report on this a couple days ago when everyone else did. It makes me wonder if VA is somehow invested in the enterprise and thus not allowed to comment publically. We'll all see Monday morning though. Check out theitquestion.com and ginger-chat.com for more info (the latter has a good video of the GMA Friday teaser piece). I really thought there'd be a whole lot of buzz around this through the weekend, but I guess we'll have to wait till Monday.

  49. Charter@Home kicked ass for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charter@Home in Madison Wisconsin converted us to their Pipeline service last night at 12:29AM local time. I hadn't converted off of @Home yet with their CD and I still have my @Home IP address. In the interim they are NATing people who haven't done a DHCP renew yet, I expect to get a Charter Pipeline address when I do. The extra NAT thing was professionalism and great customer service and I appreciate it. The whole thing was down for 43 minutes for me. All that's different is now my bandwidth comes from a completely different place. This is what it's like to be with a provider that had a contingency plan in place and executed it. Way to go Charter!

  50. You mean... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    People aren't port 80 telnetting into that IP already, and manually typing in the GET HTTP 1.1 themselves? Gee, they must not be serious slashdotters.

  51. No block sync in Mount Prospect either. by vjlen · · Score: 1

    I lost access around 8am this morning. Friends around the city and over in Michigan are reporting the same.

    I did get an automated phone call from AT&T this morning stating they're working to reconnect us, and it will be several days.

    FYI, don't bother to contact AT&T tech support -- they're completely clueless and relying on macro-generated answers to your questions.

    1. Re:No block sync in Mount Prospect either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I myself have a connection in Burr Ridge. My friend in Darien got converted a little over 2 months ago from the old grey motorola modems, from the old MediaOne Express to @home which he didn't want. His connection by the logs on the linux went down at 7:26am this morning, my other friend in Willowbrook theirs went down at noon. All of which have the "elmhurst" in their reverse which I presume is all the same server.

      Friend of a Friend in Madison WI got disconnected at about 2am tonight. I had to go out and buy a modem and I'm on AOL now (gag). Time to see if I can resolve my DSL problems soon. Stupid broke 144k line and broken @home. Problem is where all of us live we're over 30k feet from a central office, best we can get is 144k, actually less because we'd have to be on 1-2 repeaters.

      I suspect that someone was having a little bit of fun, in Darien there's one flashing green light, at my home I'm getting DHCP offers from 192.168.100.1, which I think is someone having some fun ;)

      I had heard on WGN they expected to be up fully in the chicagoland area in 3-4 hours, that's came and passed to no avail. Also when I called you don't have a push a fucking hostname anymore so straight dhcp will work fine for you. When I had called up there they said 1-14 days.

      It seems the Taliban is running @home now. Regardless, I will be disconnecting my at&t long distance, cell phones, and cable this week and citing this fiasco. You may not be able to hurt @home or at&t by leaving their service but you can hurt them in other areas, bottom line make a statement that you're not going to put up with this shit anymore.

      A job that I worked at a few years back they were shopping for an OC-3, he had at&t come in and when they were going to close to deal they had the director of sales for Illinois come in, at which point they were told they weren't going to be buying an OC-3 from them as if they can't manage a fucking cable modem network what makes them think they can manage a real network?

      --bastardXL

  52. Re:Off Topic, but Important: Ginger/IT To Be Revea by DCowern · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Funny. I submitted this story and had it rejected. I never thought VA might be involved with the unveiling process. I understand /. has a fairly broad range with what they publish but maybe CmdrTaco knows what's going to be revealed and doesn't want to let anything slip. ;-)

  53. AT&T fully functional in Portland, but a bit s by bruckie · · Score: 1

    I woke up this morning, and all my cable modem lights were on as usual.

    I just had to switch my firewall from a static IP address to instead use DHCP, and everything was dandy. The AT&T nameservers provided by DHCP work. What's weird is that they provided about fifty nameservers, and a bunch of them are 0.0.0.0. However, the first two work fine.

    E-mail works, usenet works, everything! I'm very impressed, and very happy with AT&T's transition. Kudos to their network engineers!

    --Bruce

    P.S. The service is a bit slower. I am getting about 800Kbps max download speed. With @Home I often got over 1Mbps. Still, it sure beats dialup.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't.
  54. AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not sure it will help a lot of people, but this is what I just did to get reconnected. (Gotta feed the /. habit.) I'm in Fort Collins, CO if that's relevant to anyone. I haven't got a phone call from AT&T yet. But that may well be on account of the phone number they have listed for me is disconnected right now.

    I did try sending out DHCP requests before doing this, but never got any replies. I wouldn't call this course of action exceptionally friendly behaviour. But the web sites AT&T listed in some email this past week are either unreachable or have nothing helpful.

    • Listen for IP traffic coming over the modem. I did tcpdump -n -i eth0 and figured that the not-10.x.x.x router doing all the ARP requests was the neighborhood router.
    • Make note of several of the IP addresses that the router continues to ask for and stop tcpdump. Also note the suspected router address.
    • Set your IP address to one of the addresses from the previous step (see ifconfig(8) for help on that.) Add a default route through the router you found in the last step. route add -net default x.x.x.x )
    • Hope someone follows up with a suggestion on getting DHCP working again or that you get a phone call from AT&T.
    Gotchas:
    • You may well be hijacking someone else's legitimate IP address. And quite possibly violating your AUP in the process.
    • Your cable modem does need to think it has a good connection to the network. Look for a set of lights glowing steadily. Or if it has a web interface, look at that. My RCA cable modem has a status page at http://192.168.100.1/

    Good Luck!

    1. Re:AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by linzeal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh man you idiot giving out your ip address like that I just hax0red you so . . .

    2. Re:AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by xercist · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm in Fort Collins now, and posting from my nice stable DSL line :P

      But my many friends with ATT@Home have gone down. Not just partially down- No level-2 link to the cable modem. Where are you, specifically, that you got it working?

      Also, I seem to have gotten the "phone call" myself, even though I'm not a cable modem subscriber at all...how very competant of them...

      --

      --
      grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    3. Re:AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just off Shields about a mile south of the AT&T office. North of Drake, though. So outside Qworst's DSL availability area.

      I did go through an unknown number of hours without a link light on the modem. They were a steady green when I popped back in at home around 1500 local time.

    4. Re:AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, very funny...

      Now, go read up on class c networking and no /.ing until you're done.

      --
      - I am made of meat.
    5. Re:AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1

      All this is largely unnecesary. Instead, first
      thing, kill your dhcpclient, then pull the plug on your cablemodem and plug it back in. You may have to do this once or twice before you establish a connection to the network. You should also wait for around 20 to 30 seconds before plugging it back in.

      Then, run this:
      tcpdump -i eth0 -lf dst port 68

      This should then begin spewing out the replies from at&t's dhcp server(s). Once you start getting these (should be in the 12. /8. Mine was in 12.239, in texas) you should be home free. Just wipe any lease files you have left lying around make any necessary modifications to it's config file, and restart your dhcpclient. It should come back up right away. If not, you might try assigning yourself a static one then trying again. Just make sure you pick an ip that's way up there in the pool so the dhcp server doesn't try to pass it out before you are done using it or you'll cause some poor user & tech unnecessary headaches.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    6. Re:AT&T@Home getting re-connected HOWTO by bgarcia · · Score: 2
      You may well be hijacking someone else's legitimate IP address. And quite possibly violating your AUP in the process.
      What are they going to do - disconnect my service?

      Seriously though, does anyone know if this would screw up only @home's network, or would it be a pain for AT&T? Obviously, I could care less about screwing up @Home's network at this point.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  55. Call from my cable company by Malbosia · · Score: 0
    I just recieved a recorded call from Charter Communications stating that "The court ordered @home to discontinue service and the network was being disassembled." The message can be heard at (866) 837-3620.

    I have yet to be disconnected, but I talked to my neighboor who lives just down the street, and she said she had no service. Apparently her DNS server had been turned off, I entered in a new DNS server, and it worked fine. Anyway, just waiting for the axe to fall..

  56. Completely Down in Seattle by zzyzx · · Score: 1

    I was up and running just fine at 6 AM. around quarter to 7 my telnet session closed and that's all she wrote. Any attempt at a traceroute to anywhere dies either immediately or just past getting to the gateway. I'm resorting to my laptop and my aol account right now.

    1. Re:Completely Down in Seattle by jrst · · Score: 1

      Found the same at my location (in Seattle). I noticed that (according to my fw logs) probes stopped at about 4:15AM PST.

      However, I've discovered a few intersting items while waiting (annoyingly) for word from AT&T...

      The original gateway still answers, but doesn't seem to go anywhere. Found another gateway at 10.82.2.1 and pings answering at 10.82.2.xxx and 10.82.3.xxx. Unfortunately, I haven't found a way out of the maze yet.

      I can still get to my @home email using the same old pop host/account (getting to it through my trusty old netcom/earthlink account).

      I also found that my @home accont/password works at AT&T broadband (attbi.com) for signing in and to pick up email at "athomeusername@attbi.com".

      I tried configuring my system as attbi suggests (dhcp), but no luck. In short, it looks like AT&T has completed populating their attbi replacement service for everything except actual the actual connectivity. *sigh*

    2. Re:Completely Down in Seattle by statusbar · · Score: 2

      TELNET SESSION?!??!!!

      Have you been hacked or sniffed lately?

      You might be lucky that your connection stopped!

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    3. Re:Completely Down in Seattle by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      I was telnetting out, not having someone else telnet in.

  57. Screwed in Chicagoland by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

    The situation in Chicagoland is not so good. I'm connected through the Romeoville/Joliet hub, which services a large fraction of the south suburbs, and absolutely nothing is working. My friend in Bolingbrook (a bit farther north) is having a similar experience. The cable light on the modem is out, the mail servers report my account as inactive, et al.

    The shitty thing is, I just migrated my entire family over to @home from mediaone not two months ago. Just as we're starting to return to normalcy, this happens. I'll be reconfiguring computers and informing friends and clients about YAEA (yet another email address) in short order. Bitch bitch bitch, I know, but is it too much to ask for some stable connectivity for $45/mo.?

    Anyone else on Chicagoland cable feeling my pain? :-)

    1. Re:Screwed in Chicagoland by SIGBUS · · Score: 1
      You too, huh?

      This morning, connectivity was still available, but the mail and news servers locked me out. I went out for a bike ride, and when I came back this afternoon, service was completely out (the CABLE light was not lit).

      AT&T has lost what little goodwill I had for it. That's twice in one year that they've screwed high-speed internet access subscribers. My employer had a Northpoint-provisioned DSL circuit. Now this. I knew there was a reason I didn't cancel my 56K dialup account.

      Broadband - it's as dead as disco.

      --
      Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    2. Re:Screwed in Chicagoland by skt · · Score: 1

      Springfield, IL has been down all day as well.. I haven't tried it in a few hours but when I woke up at 8:00am everything was working fine except for DNS. Then I decided to try a DHCP release and renew and that pretty much killed by connection :) After power cycling the cable modem I lost sync and haven't been able to get it back all day. Insight@home has updated their page again and confirmed that it was an unintentional error and that service should be restored in the near future.. hopfully I'll be back up tomorrow.

    3. Re:Screwed in Chicagoland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know we are down in Elmhurst, and I have friends down in Arlington Heights and Lombard.. That pretty much takes care of the Old MediaOne network... what makes it worse, the forced me to convert from MediaOne to @home only about 6 weeks ago....

      Assholes.

    4. Re:Screwed in Chicagoland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same deal in Northern Suburbs. I live in Glencoe, but connect through Highland Park. The status lights lights on the modem have been blinkng all day. Back to the ole' 56k modem for a while. It was very painfull to reconnect the modem to the phone line after about a year of no use.

    5. Re:Screwed in Chicagoland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I'm on the rmlvl (or whatever) hub and the cable light is out. Which is especially wonderful since a lot of my job involves telecommuting. Today I'm going to the computer store to buy a modem. :-(

    6. Re:Screwed in Chicagoland by jennygerbi · · Score: 1

      Hi!

      I'm in westmont, just north of Argonne. Yeah, my cable light has been out since midnight before last- big help all this DNS stuff is when you don't even have a connection! I'm now at work.. downloading AOL 6.0... so I can install it at home to use my backup ID on my dad's account. Where's an AOL coaster when you need one! Oh, I hate when things happen that make me default to AOL.

      I don't use my @home mail, so I didn't get any of the notices about what to do. If you find out, could you post them here or pop me an email at jennifer_gerbi@yahoo.com? Yes: we are screwed.

      -Jenny

  58. Re: Canadian @Home by halo8 · · Score: 1

    Ive always wondered why @Home in the us costs so much, i mean $55us thats like $80CDN, i wouldnt pay that, i pay $42CDN and im with @Rogers and except for some minor (1 week long outage) i cant complain. except for the fact that that stupid "DMCA shutting down @Home news groups" but now i got them all back WHOOHOO!! u guys ever hear of a news group called alt.binaries.cdimages? its all ISO stuff u can download!! A W S O M E !!! thank you @Rogers!!

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  59. AT&T@Home is kaput in Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cablemodem still has sync, but can't get past the second hop on the traceroute. Likewise, a trace in dies at the hop right before the cablemodem.

    Gah. No one likes AT&T's tactics, self-inclusive, but this is hardly fair to those of us who are too far from a regional telco's central office to be able to get DSL.

  60. Re:Some People @Home, Some Not @Home by CGNC · · Score: 1

    Transition near St. Louis went well... Folks at Charter made sure everyone got over to charter.net with minimal pain and suffering.

  61. Not us! by gillbates · · Score: 2
    At&t says that our service could be down for up to seven days. From the outset, their service in the Chicago area has been plagued with numerous outages, which is why they won't be getting any checks from us anytime soon.

    I hate to say it, but after 4 months of non-service, I've decided to go back to dialup. I've had nothing but problems with both their network service, and their customer service. Today, their phone support line was still telling customers to check the website for troubleshooting problems!

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  62. Re:Off Topic, but Important: Ginger/IT To Be Revea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck cares?
    -Jamie

  63. Watch out for their Troubleshooting util.. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Informative

    it appears to use/call a series of VB scripts.

    There is now a little systray utility run from the startup section in the registry...I hate it when installers do that... best thing about 98se and msconfig...uncheck...done.

    Not too bright, IMO, to be using VBS for this..bat file would work just as well.

    I "can't/won't" run them (VB scripts), as anything with a .vbs extnesion is associated with notepad...heheee.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Watch out for their Troubleshooting util.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. If Windows actually came with useful commandline tools (such as grep and mail), you could replicate any outlook virus with a BAT file. There's nothing magically bad about VBS, it's just a scripting language that can access COM.

      This is supposed to be a technical site, so please leave the superstitious voodoo at home. On the otherhand, if you see some poor coding practice or something nefarious in the scripts, feel free to tell us.

    2. Re:Watch out for their Troubleshooting util.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the area of msconfig you're talking about is just some reg keys you can edit manually too. run regedit and check out hkeylocalmachine/software/microsoft/windows/curren tversion/run/*

    3. Re:Watch out for their Troubleshooting util.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget hkey_current_user and hkey_users\default

  64. Oak Park IL is out (?) by elmegil · · Score: 1

    My neighbor has (had) @home service here in Oak Park IL, and he said that while they didn't get shut off last night, they are off now. Of course that was a few hours ago, if AT&T is doing some magic trick to turn people back on, I wouldn't know about it.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:Oak Park IL is out (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we have a little blinking "power" light and not much else here in Willowbrook. I was having problems checking my e-mail and usenet between 7:30am and 9:00am. I contacted customer service around 8:30am and they said there was an email & news outage. At almost exactly 9:00am, I lost the ability to connect to anything. Sometime between then and 2:00am on Sunday, we lost our connection completely.



      *sigh*

  65. Re:What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course DNS was before WINS, and in fact even before Microsoft anything. But there was also a hosts file too.

  66. The DNS hack only worked for a few minutes by paulexander · · Score: 1

    When I woke up this morning at 8:00am PST, The "Cable" light on my cable modem was still lit. I could ping the default gateway, but DNS was obviously dead.

    I used a previous employers DNS server but that only worked for a little while.

    Now the "cable" light is dead. I imagine many other will soon see this, as they continue to disconnect equipment throughout the day. I got a phone call from a machine at AT&T, that said they expect to be back up within a week (AAAGGGHH). They will credit 2 days off my bill for every 1 day of lost service.

    Luckily, I setup a little NetZero account last night. I bought the premium, only cuz I hate that advertising crap. Besides, I'll get the $9.95 back after the double credit I'm getting from AT&T.

    I hate having to use this old Modulator/Demodulator, but it'll do. So far, I'm pretty impressed with the service.

    My Modem's so old, it's still labeled "US Robotics".

    1. Re:The DNS hack only worked for a few minutes by thumbtack · · Score: 1

      You think that's old? My says US Robitics, and has had TWO firmware upgrades to take it from 33.6 to 56K and then to V.90 This was back when the darned things cost as much as a Cable modem does today. ($120+) I think this is the same model Miles Standish used for the Pilgram's connection. ( I could be wrong about that though).

      Mine is ready, setting on the desktop in case my Cox@home here in VA goes...

    2. Re:The DNS hack only worked for a few minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are guys talking about? They still say US Robotics on them (www.usr.com).

    3. Re:The DNS hack only worked for a few minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's old?

      My modem has jumpers on it. Jumpers. It took me ten minutes to figure out why it wasn't showing up in Device Manager...it's not plug and play!

      It took me another hour to try every possible jumper config until I found a COM/IRQ combination that would actually work.

    4. Re:The DNS hack only worked for a few minutes by _outcat_ · · Score: 2

      You think THAT'S old!

      My modem says "Campbell's Chicken Noodle" on one can and "Spaghettios" on the other! And they're attached with string! Why, in my day we were lucky if we got 1 byte/second!

      Young whippersnappers.

      --
      Angry IT woman in big clompy boots. And talking lint!.
    5. Re:The DNS hack only worked for a few minutes by thumbtack · · Score: 1

      We'll if were gonna have a p*ssing contest..I still have a Commodore 300K modem around here somewhere..

  67. B USEay Area by ApheX · · Score: 1

    I'm in Monterey, CA - which is considered in the Bay Area customer base. As of 6am this morning service was not working. At about noon, the cable modem lost sync.

    I saw this coming when @Homo first announced bankruptcy. Why didn't AT&T see it? Out of ALL the cable companies out there AT&T is the only one that has had an network infastructure already in place.

    AT&T is resting on the laurels that their customers will stay with them.. I sure hope people dont.

    Also, maybe this situation will realize that CABLE INTERNET NEEDS TO BE OPEN - NOT A CLOSED INFASTRUCTRE - If i dont want to use ATT/@Home - let me use who I want!!

    Sadly, this will probably never happen...

    --

    -
    aphex
    I Steal Music!
  68. Irony by quantaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any one else see the irony in the multitude of posts telling people how to get back on line?

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like when you call for tech support for you ISP, and they tell you to check their website for outages...
      -red

  69. Re:@Home stay online HOWTO - for Charter by bluntmanspam · · Score: 2, Informative
    I did the opposite. My local AT&T cable office was bought out by Charter a few months ago. Today when my internet connection went down while I was using it. I just changed off of my static @home IP to dynamic and let it choose a Charter IP. Looks like Charter was ready to switch as soon as it happened. Now I just have to dial into my network and change all of my IPChains lists. ;)

    First good thing that Charter has done for me.

  70. @home was mediaone could jump back to roadrunner . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the whole infrastructure is still in place. those were the garbage customers though. pita.

  71. ATT Now Limiting Downstream Speeds Too by denovich · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...assuming you even have a connection. Less for More! Horray.

    I cliped this from ATT's broadband support page:

    I Understand that AT&T Broadband Has Changed Downstream Speeds on the New Service. Why are You Limiting Downstream Bandwidth?

    The new AT&T Broadband Internet network as been built to optimize our customers' high-speed Internet experience. This means that customers speed settings will be set at 1.5 MB downstream and 128kb upstream to ensure that all customers receive an optimized broadband experience. These speed settings are part of our continuous effort to provide customers with the fastest, most consistent broadband service at the lowest possible price. Our lightning-fast connection enhances Internet experiences through fast e-mail communication, quick access to research and surfing, a fantastic gaming experience, quick video clip and music downloads and a whole lot more. The AT&T Broadband Internet network also has been built for future advanced service offerings. We're examining tiered speeds as a future service enhancement in addition to other offerings.

    1. Re:ATT Now Limiting Downstream Speeds Too by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      I've been measuring my connection since reading this around 2am yesterday on the attbi site and so far I've kept speeds from .7 to 1.8 mbit/s downstream.

      I think they're just covering their asses right now. Not that we might not really all get capped in the end, but right now I'm often exceeding this "cap".

      My upstream tests are too scattered to deem reliable, but I've not exceeded 121kb/s yet as far as I can tell. Not surprising.

      TheBitch

      --
      - I am made of meat.
    2. Re:ATT Now Limiting Downstream Speeds Too by ApheX · · Score: 1

      In my area I was able to hit 600KB/sec and better speeds. I hate AT&T. Now their product offers ABSOLUTELY NO ADVANTAGE to DSL.

      --

      -
      aphex
      I Steal Music!
    3. Re:ATT Now Limiting Downstream Speeds Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the way I see it too.

      AT&T has mentioned that they will offer higher bandwidth connection, but on for higher $$$$.

      Hell, for $45 a month I could go with DSL. The whole point of getting cable, at least for me here in CT, was that I typically saw 350-400 KBytes/s, with bursts up to 550KB/s.

      Since moving over to attbi I haven't seen over 650 MBITS per second!

      Screw this.

  72. Interesting perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't one of the admin's post the #'s from a normal Saturday and the #'s from today to see the difference in the amount of visitors?

  73. Pretty Funny by Nessak · · Score: 1

    If you to ma.attbroadband.com/manunsupported.html you come to page which tell you how to "Update your settings" to the new AT&T network. About halfway down the page it tell you what to change your home page to: www.xxx.com. Obviously its a porn site. I can't figure out if this is hack or if someone at AT&T is just really stupid. This page is for people running unsupported OSs, but the other howto pages have the same link.

  74. [OT] Bush and Enron by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    PS - I bet all those liberals who insisted the Bushies sell all their Enron stock a year ago are fucking pissed :)

    Not really, Bush may have made his money, but at least my tax dollars aren't bailing out Enron. I suspect we would be, if he still owned boatloads of stock...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:[OT] Bush and Enron by ahde · · Score: 2

      bush didn't own enron, Cheney worked for them (Exec) before they were very big.

  75. No, we are using Dial up by bstadil · · Score: 1

    No We are all using silly dial-up like NetZero and wants to get back the service we have paid for.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  76. Wow, Morpheus is Toasted by Dynastar454 · · Score: 1

    I dont know if this is related or not, but Morpheus has exactly 43 users online right now, sharing 40 GB of stuff. Is that sad or what?

    --


    Laugh at stupidity: mod idiots +1 Funny.
    1. Re:Wow, Morpheus is Toasted by Dynastar454 · · Score: 1

      I know, replying to yourself is lame, but it seems maybe it was just me: all of a sudden there are the normal amount on...

      --


      Laugh at stupidity: mod idiots +1 Funny.
  77. Comcast@Home, Harrisburg, PA is up as of 7PM 12/1 by Cygnus+v1 · · Score: 1

    ...but speed during primetime (i.e. between 5pm-midnight Eastern) has been noticably slower than off-peak times. Between last night and 6:30am this morning, I saw a 10x increase in download speed from a well-connected server. Web browsing is slower as well, but I don't use @Home's software or proxy servers. My email is still accessible.

    From what I'm reading in the news, it looks like Comcast is one of the companies still negotiating with Excite@Home. I just hope things are ironed out by early next week without service interruptions.

    I'm surprised Verizon hasn't called me to solicit DSL given the state of things...

    --
    ---- Politics: Kissing ass and pointing blames.
  78. WAY fewer port scans today by gekman · · Score: 1

    Here in New Jersey, Comcast@Home is still alive and well. I turned on the PC at about 7:30 A.M. and as of 7:06 P.M. ZoneAlarm has ony registered seven hits. As usual, almost all of them are from 24.x.x.x IPs. Of the seven, two were from the 24.0.0.203 police making sure that I'm not running an illicit NNTP server on their network.

    I think that there's a lesson or something in there somewhere, but I'm not sure what it is...

    --
    Look at all the happy creatures dancing on the lawn...
  79. Atlanta Area by RandomFactor · · Score: 1
    ATT Broadband went down this morning on multiple customers I know of, including me, sometime after 1:30am when I went to bed last night.
    Statically configured
    Unable to traceroute completely out
    Switching DNS servers ineffective


    Switched to DHCP, received a lease, worked instantly.
    DNS Searchorder added "ga.attbroadband.com"
    IP Address (and gateway) now on a different subnet
    2 different DNS servers received also.



    So if you have a static address, try requesting a DHCP lease. (AT&T hasn't contacted us about this one way or the other yet :-)

    Happy happy. Now we see how long this lasts...

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
  80. Mind you its the creditors by eean · · Score: 1

    Remember that Excite@Home is not an entity representing stockholders anymore, as it was before it filed for bankruptcy, but is being controlled by those who Excite@Home owes money to. Considering that ATT owns like a third of Excite@Home it would not have made sense otherwise.

  81. Corporate Warfare by ahde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are all aware that Excite@Home was just bought at pennies on the dollar by Microsoft? This is the first strike in a corporate warfare between AT&T and the Redmond giant. Did you notice how the article quotes a Microsoft employee (from Sammamish, Washington) who blames AT&T for service being cut off --and threatens a lawsuit, when it was actually Microsoft that pulled the plug?

    Microsoft's ultimate target is AOL/Time Warner, but they need the broadband infrastructure that AT&T has before they take on AOL. They've already got Qwest, and are forcing virtually all DSL subscribers west of the Mississippi (outside California) to use a proprietary MSN and sign up for Passport. Expect Real Networks to fall soon too, unless they ally with AOL.

    1. Re:Corporate Warfare by Legion303 · · Score: 3, Informative
      They've already got Qwest, and are forcing virtually all DSL subscribers west of the Mississippi (outside California) to use a proprietary MSN and sign up for Passport.

      This is incorrect. I've had DSL for a couple of years now at three different locations, and I've used the same local ISP every time. There has never been any push or even a suggestion from Qwest for me to use MSN.

      I hate Qwest and MS as much as the next guy, but let's stick to facts.

      -Legion

    2. Re:Corporate Warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please provide evidence (a news article or something...)

  82. AT&T @Home reconnecting (CORRECTED) by PureFiction · · Score: 5, Informative
    First: Oregon and Washington are the only states that AT&T is able to connect on their new network at this time. See http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/011201/n01282093_5.html

    If you are in one of those two states, you will notice that your cable modem is still synch'ed up, and that any site you try and reach will take you to this AT&T page:

    http://transition-aid.attbi.com/attbi_welcome_page .html

    This is because you are using the OLD @home nameservers, which AT&T has replaced to resolve ALL DNS lookups to their migration help site.

    The fix is as simple as it reads in the Manually Configuring Unsupported Operating Systems page

    1. Fire up a dhcp client. In my case, all I needed to issue was the command:
    • $ dhcpcd eth1
    2. Check your DNS servers (/etc/resolv.conf) and remove any of the old @home servers. The new IPs I got were:

    • 204.127.198.4
      63.240.76.4
    3. If you have any machines inside a NAT network, you need to update their DNS server lists as well (unless your gateway is set as the DNS)

    4. Change your outgoing SMTP server to mail.attbi.com instead of the *.home.com host.

    And that should do it! I was actually surprised how easy it was to get back online after they made the changes. I was dreading bringing out the old 56k modem again.

    Lets home the remaining states get their access back soon as well...

    1. Re:AT&T @Home reconnecting (CORRECTED) by jrst · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this won't work for all WA customers; see:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=24373&thresh ol d=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=2642220#2642407

    2. Re:AT&T @Home reconnecting (CORRECTED) by PureFiction · · Score: 2

      Well, not Everyone is OR and WA is converted yet, but most are. No one at all is converted outside of OR and WA.

      If you have connectivity, you will know it because every site to try to reach will take you to the AT&T network migration page. Then you can use the above to get things working again.

    3. Re:AT&T @Home reconnecting (CORRECTED) by wbackous · · Score: 1

      Not everyone in Washinton is back online, but Vancouver is back!

      Service went out early this morning at about 5AM. Cable modem lost sync, "Oh GREAT!"

      Within 45Min the cable modem had re synced but still no internet. "WTF!"

      Started poking arround, seeing what I could ping and what I couldn't. Then realized I had set my IP, Gateway and DNS staticly, "Doh!"

      A few clicks on Win2K's TCP/IP controls and I was back on the net. "Tiiight!"

      I have said bad things about ATT before, I take them all back! But, only as long as I stay online... gota feed that Slashdot addiction...

    4. Re:AT&T @Home reconnecting (CORRECTED) by LM741N · · Score: 1

      I can attest to Oregon being on line. I was very impressed with my FreeBSD boxes. I'd never used this feature: I just executed /stand/sysinstall and went to the network settings and checked the DHCP box. It did the rest. (of course email had to be changed by hand). Very impressive. Rob.

    5. Re:AT&T @Home reconnecting (CORRECTED) by kgp · · Score: 1

      Note that if you follow the transition-aid instructions (at least on the DHCP server I'm getting address from) you will still be fsck'ed because the DNS's they provide are in the following order:

      24.0.224.33
      24.0.224.34
      204.127.198.4

      Unfortunatly the first two always resolve names to the http://transition-aid.attbi.com web site (http://216.148.227.211) so if you use the DHCP info you won't see any websites.

      I've setup statically and dropped the 24.* DNS server and I'm just relying on the other one.

      The other interesting point is they seem to be happily routing both the old IPs from @home (the 65.*) and the new ones from attbi (12.*) to make sure old static IPs still work. If you use DHCP to pick up your new address you will see the new IP and gateway addresses (and a "funny" 11 bit netmask -- 255.255.248.0).

      Reverse DNS doesn' work on my new IP. @home resolved everyone's IP to their name .sttl1.wa.home.com, for example. This doesn't seem to be the case with attbi.
      But sttl1.wa.attbi.com does exist. Wait a minute its being faked by the DNS servers.

      Posted via attbi cable mode from Seattle, WA.

      BTW, where are all the conspiracy theory posts? I can now PPTP into my work account at Microsoft.

      :-)

  83. I'm sick of this shit in Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got fucked around with mediaone, FORCED onto @home which I knew were a bunch of cocksmokers. I'll probably start a small claims suit because I can't play Everquest or Ultima online, yes I know I should be shot for playing such games but not being able to play for 2 weeks those fucks are going to pay for my subscription fee's. If anyone is interested I'm probably going to organize a picketing of the downersgrove facility.

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. cox@home - Phoenix by optize · · Score: 0

    This morning at 7:30AM, Phoenix had no service to cox@home, or atleast some people in Phoenix, including me. After not being able to connect for 2 hours, I figured we were shut down, but soon afterwards, we came back online.

    Whew. What a nightmare!

    1. Re:cox@home - Phoenix by HomeGroove · · Score: 1
      I'm sure this thread is dead, but are you still under Cox@home or under a dedicated Cox network?

      I'm on Cox here in Hampton Roads and we're still up. My Cox is still up? *groan*

      --

      ----
      Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  86. Keeping my eyes open by Jake96 · · Score: 1

    I am diligently monitoring /. for the dreaded news that @Home and Cox, my cable modem provider, have discontinued negotiations and I have lost service...

  87. Re: Canadian @Home by atam · · Score: 1

    Which news servers are you using? The one I used in Toronto area still does not carry those banned binaries news group :-(

  88. Economics, my friend. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Simply put... there's no such thing as an absolute value.
    The Canadian dollar is worth less? Well, yes. But the average canadian salary is ALSO less, and the cost of living is different.

    In the US, you have 10x the population, and enough people who can afford those higher prices.

    Comparing $ to $ is not valid.. you have to look at the overall picture. Yes, equipemt cost more if you break it down per cusotmer, because they make less of each customer.. but that's about it. Plus, you have to take into account the simpler telecom infrastructure.. I suspect we have less taxes and less beurocracy.

    1. Re:Economics, my friend. by Lonath · · Score: 1

      Simply put... there's no such thing as an absolute value.

      Yes there is: #define ABS(x) ((x)<0?-(x):(x))

      :P

  89. For those still not back on and pissed about it by pivot_enabled · · Score: 2, Funny

    Welcome manders1 ...
    Connecting to server. Please wait...
    Connected to athchat02.broadband.att.com
    Sat, December 01 2001 12:11PM Mountain Standard Time
    https://help.broadband.att.com/index.jsp?pushedf ro m=chat
    Hello! Welcome to AT&T @Home's Online Customer Support Center. Your session ID # is 1479181.
    We apologize for the delay and appreciate your patience. A message from a customer care specialist should appear in the chat window shortly.
    To quickly find answers to questions you may have about your AT&T@Home service, check out our Fast Answers to Questions section above.
    To view any possible service interruptions in your area and to access other timesaving tools, click on the Service Tools section on the left navigation panel above.
    In-Angela Stone has joined this session!
    You say: Hello
    In-Angela Stone says: Thank you for contacting AT&TBroadband Internet.My name is Angela; I understand you are having issue with connectivity.I would be glad to assist you with the same.
    You say: I'd like to discontinue my service
    In-Angela Stone says: In order to assist you with this, may I please have your first and last name, telephone number, complete home address, primary login,
    and personal access code?
    You say: Michael Anderson
    You say: (xxx) xxx-xxxx
    You say: 123 somewhere Circle, San Ramon ca 94583
    You say: I dont "log in" to @Home
    You say: I believe my user name is manders1
    In-Angela Stone says: Thank you for the information.Please stand by for a moment.
    You say: I use my own mail server etc so i've never needed my @home log in
    In-Angela Stone says: May I know if you are sure you want to disconnect the services?
    You say: I dont know, may you?
    You say: whats your question?
    In-Angela Stone says: Michael, may I know why do you want to discontinue the services?
    You say: I've paid you guys probably $1500 dollars or more over the last three years or so....
    You say: Now I am disconnected
    You say: YES I want to discontinue my service DUH!
    In-Angela Stone says: I am sincerely sorry for all the trouble this .
    You say: fortunately my Telocity back up DSL service is functioning fine so that I
    can 'chat' with you about being disconnected
    You say: can we get on with it?
    In-Angela Stone says: Due to Excite@Home's bankruptcy filing, we are transitioning your service to an AT&T network.
    You say: Please disontinue my account NOW!
    In-Angela Stone says: During this transition, your service will be temporarily unavailable.
    You say: what am I talking to eliza here?
    You say: The humor is probably lost on you
    You say: please disconnect me
    You say: (from the @home network)
    You say: quit billing me
    You say: stop my service
    In-Angela Stone says: Okay Michael, kindly standby.
    You say: Today is Saturday, December 01, 2001
    You say: The day on which I discontinue my @Home/ATT Broadband service
    You say: The day on which I quit paying $58.79 a month
    You say: Thats an extrea $705.00 dollar per year for ME
    In-Angela Stone says: I am sincerely sorry for all the trouble this has caused you.
    You say: Boy for $705 per year you'd expect REALLY good service
    You say: You don't need to apologize. It has caused me no trouble because I have a backup service
    You say: I dont trust you guys
    You say: It amuses me thats all
    You say: ATT loses $705 not me why should I be upset?
    You say: I still have service as you can see
    You say: I've already told you what I want
    You say: I assume you are handling it
    You say: what reason is there for me to need to
    You say: "hang on"
    In-Angela Stone says: Michael, I have forwarded your issue to the required department.They will do the needful for you.
    You say: OK fine so are we done or what?
    In-Angela Stone says: I have forwarded your request , now they will do the needful Michael.
    You say: also there is nothing 'needful' other than to quit billing me which will happen in any event once I inform my card company of my desires
    You say: What more do you need of me?
    You say: Hello?
    In-Angela Stone says: Michael, as I have forwarded your request.
    You say: Yes?
    In-Angela Stone says: They will do the needful.
    You say: Youill discontinue my service?
    You say: yes?
    You say: is that it?
    You say: are we done?
    You say: Is this a computer?
    You say: I am talkin to eliza aren't I
    You say: how humiliating
    In-Angela Stone says: Micheal you are chatting with a humann being.
    You say: prove it
    You say: You still sound like eliza
    In-Angela Stone says: Michael, yes they will discontinue your services.
    You say: Thanks, so are we done?
    You say: Come on I need 'closure'
    In-Angela Stone says: Yes Michael.
    In-Angela Stone says: Thank you for contacting AT&TBroadband Internet, goodbye.
    You say: excellent, bye
    The session has en

    1. Re:For those still not back on and pissed about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear...that was fascinating. The 'needful'?

    2. Re:For those still not back on and pissed about it by Legion303 · · Score: 2
      Hey, cool! Abuse a frontline phone monkey for the stupid actions of her managers! Way to go!

      Too bad you couldn't have slapped her around a little too, to show her who the man was, eh?

      -Legion

    3. Re:For those still not back on and pissed about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory is that if we make the lives of those front-line telemarketers (and that's just what she is) miserable enough, they'll quit. If enough of them quit, then the management above them will be forced to look at the real problem. Not that I have much hope those arrogant jerks at AT&T, @Home, or any of the other telcos and cable companies will *ever* understand just how angry their customers are becoming. Write your representatives in congress. Write to your state's attorney general. Write to your state's consumer protection bureau. Don't just rant on /. -- do your complaining where it might do some good!

  90. (OT)Slashcode and brand new stories by yerricde · · Score: 1

    They will have been swamped by /. users almost instantly after the story was posted. This is slashcode 2.0 - it has faster response times.....

    Not necessarily. I'm pretty sure that Slashdot doesn't update the main page until a few minutes after a brand new story hits the database in order to keep ACs from rapidly reloading the homepage, trying to get first post. I'm not sure whether this is a feature of Slashcode out-of-the-box or of the customized version that Slashdot runs.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:(OT)Slashcode and brand new stories by kilrogg · · Score: 1

      I think that only applies if your not logged in, I've logged out once and had newer stories dissapear from the mainpage

  91. internal att memo by cha0sadddddddd · · Score: 1

    there is a bunch of dumb stuff i dont feel like typing so heres the stuff i found interesting.

    Q:will i be credited?
    A:yes you will automaticly recieve 2 days credit for every 1 day your service is unavailable.

    #bunch of stupid shit about usernames and homepages and shit#

    #bunch of stupid shit about billing saying nothing will change#

    Q:will i have a stitic ip address?
    A: no,you wil need to use dhcp.

    Q:will my downstream speed change?
    A:yes it will be limited to 1.5 MB downstrean
    (methinks mabye they mean Mb)

    will post more if they hand me anymore "internal document only not for external distribution" packets lol

    --
    Collecting data is only the first step toward wisdom. But sharing data is the first step toward community
  92. Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by kcbrown · · Score: 5, Insightful
    By turning off all their subscribers, Excite@home has effectively made an enemy of AT&T. Now that they've done this, I see one of two outcomes:
    1. Excite@home will turn the services back on and take the offer they were given (if that's even possible!)

      or

    2. AT&T will finish transitioning their customers to their own internal network and tell Excite@home to go fsck themselves.

    So if Excite doesn't turn their network back on VERY soon, like in the next day or so, they're toast: AT&T has the cash and resources to manage their cablemodem subscribers themselves. Once Excite@home no longer has anyone hooked up to their network, their value will drop through the floor.

    In short, even though the offer they were given probably wasn't very good (it was probably really bad, actually), now that they've shut down their customers they're dead. And if I were AT&T, I'd see to it that the floor was wiped with Excite@home in retaliation for screwing over my customers.

    The only variable I know of here that can affect the outcome is the rate at which cablemodem subscribers bail out and go with some other service, for those that can. Since it takes at least a couple of weeks for most DSL connections to be provisioned and configured, the only immediate competition that AT&T will lose customers to is dialup, which isn't terribly comparable. So I think AT&T is pretty safe when it comes to keeping their customers for the next couple of weeks. As long as they can transition the vast majority of their customers in that amount of time, they're safe, and that means that Excite@home has managed to fsck themselves good with this idiotic move.

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    1. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by trenton · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Excite@Home actually didn't make the decision to turn off the modems. The bondholders that financed Excite@Home did. AT&T's offer was so low, they stood to loose tons of money if the deal went through. So, they filed a law suit and had a judge COMPEL Excite@Home to turn off the service. Their reason for this was that keeping the modems on was costing 6 million per week, thus causing the company to lose even more money.

      It still remains to be seen if the bondholders will come out ahead. They claim that the assets of Excite@Home alone are worth much more than AT&T's buyout offer of $307 million. I guess they're waiting for a better offer.

      But, to be sure, pissing off 850,000 people is sure going to lower the value of Excite@Home.

      --
      Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    2. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      Whether it's the bondholders or Excite@home doesn't make any difference: Excite@home is a tool of its investors and will therefore act accordingly.

      Even if Excite@home stood to lose money by accepting AT&T's deal, their valuation will now likely be a fraction of what it was before they turned off their subscribers, because the primary value of Excite@home wasn't their hardware, it was their subscribers -- who aren't likely to be around anymore after this. They will lose all of the subscribers they have turned off unless they turn them back on fast, because those subscribers will either drop the service entirely in favor of something else or AT&T will transition them to an independent infrastructure.

      And the end result is that Excite@home will end up getting pennies on the dollar for their equipment and nothing else, since they will then have nothing else of value. They may claim that their assets are worth more than the $307 million that was offered, but I doubt that's the case when their equipment is valued at pennies on the dollar. Remember: equipment these days is going for dirt cheap because of all the businesses that are failing, and the prices you see at places like eBay are as high as they get. Excite@home will probably get a lot less money than that because they have so much equipment that they'll probably go through a liquidator -- and get pennies on the dollar as a result.

      So like I said, by doing this Excite@home (or their investors. Same thing as far as I'm concerned) has essentially managed to slit its own throat.

      I have to congratulate them. I don't think they could have come up with a more boneheaded move, one which both causes it to lose its primary assets (its subscriber base) and pisses off its buyer in one stroke.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    3. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by nettdata · · Score: 2
      It still remains to be seen if the bondholders will come out ahead. They claim that the assets of Excite@Home alone are worth much more than AT&T's buyout offer of $307 million. I guess they're waiting for a better offer.


      It's funny how things are only worth as much as people are willing to pay for them.
      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    4. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by fatbastard1001 · · Score: 1

      Hold on.

      850,000 customers * $46/customer/mo = $39,100,000/mo in subscriber fees

      Does "keeping the modems on" cost $6M/wk ($24M/mo) net or gross?

      Furthermore, if you look at the value of all the residential service contracts held by excite (3.7M customers * $46/cust./mo * ~6mo remaining on contract = $1.02B), it's roughly the amount of debt held by the bondholders. Hmm.

    5. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by tshak · · Score: 2

      AT&T's offer wasn't too low. The reason that Excite stood to lose millions was because of the mismanagement of Excite - AT&T shouldn't have to pay for Excite's mistakes.

      It's like saying, "I put $30,000 into this car that's worth $20,000 on the market and I expect you to pay me $35,000 because I need to make a profit." No, the investors need to lose their money so that they learn their lesson and not invest in stupid management.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    6. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Excite only gets a fraction of your monthly subscriber fee.

    7. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by trenton · · Score: 2
      Actually, it's more like:
      1. Hey, tshak, loan me 30k. I'm going to use it to buy a 20k car that I can put up as collateral. Yeah, if I don't pay you back, you're out 10k, but I'm pretty trustworthy. But, if I do pay you back, you stand to make oodles on interest.
      2. Time passes. I make payments as agreed.
      3. Oh, shit, I lost my job. I can't pay you back. I'm bankrupt. Too bad. Well, at least you can get back some of your money by selling that 20k car.
      4. Hey, someone offered to buy that car for 10k. Why don't I just take that deal? What? You don't like that I'm selling the car below market? Too bad. It's my business decision to make. Oh, and in the meantime, I'm still driving this car around and it's costing money to operate.
      5. You win a court order, preventing me from selling. You win a court order preventing me from using the car.
      Big difference that your scenario. This News.com article explains it pretty well, too.
      --
      Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    8. Re:Bad, stupid move by Excite@home... by Keeper · · Score: 2

      I'd just like to know how the hell they managed to get a burn rate of 6 million dollars a WEEK to start off with ...

  93. I am STILL online by Raven42rac · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am so happy, my local provider is trying their damndest to keep us up and running, as per their latest e-mail:
    Dear Cox @ Home Customer:

    As you know from our previous emails, Excite @ Home, our vendor in delivering
    your Cox @ Home service, filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection at the end
    of September. We have endeavored to keep you informed of the potential impact
    this Bankruptcy could have on your Cox @ Home service and are writing to you
    today to provide the latest information we have available.

    First, we want you to know that we are committed to providing you uninterrupted
    high speed Internet service. Cox Communications has been working diligently in
    negotiations with Excite @ Home and using all legal avenues available to protect
    you, our valued customer. Meanwhile, we have been forging ahead with our
    plans to deliver reliable high speed Internet service to you on our Cox-managed
    network. You will soon be receiving additional information about our new Cox
    High Speed Internet(sm) service, along with information to help you convert to this
    new service.

    The latest developments with Excite @ Home:

    This month, Excite @ Home's creditors petitioned the Bankruptcy court with a
    motion to allow Excite @ Home to terminate service agreements with its cable
    affiliates on November 30th. This includes agreements with Cox, Comcast and
    AT&T. If the Court grants the creditors' request, there conceivably could be a
    temporary disruption in the services that Excite @ Home provides to
    approximately 3.7 million customers served by its North American cable affiliates.
    We are doing everything possible to see that there will not be a disruption in your
    service, but also want you to understand the possibilities and to be prepared:

    *If the Judge's ruling states that Excite @ Home may terminate its service
    agreements with Cox and the other cable affiliates, this does not mean that
    Excite @ Home will automatically turn off the service on November 30th.
    *With the Judge's approval, Excite @ Home would then have the ability to make
    a decision on termination; however, we are negotiating with them to prevent any
    service disruption.
    *If Excite @ Home decides to terminate service despite our efforts to negotiate a
    temporary arrangement, the question remains as to when the service would be
    terminated. We are doing everything we can to ensure that your Cox @ Home
    service continues until we can transition you to our new Cox-managed Internet
    service. In short, we are doing our best to make sure that you will never be
    without high speed Internet service.

    Additional help Cox is providing:

    In addition to exercising legal avenues, negotiating with Excite @ Home, and
    building our own high speed Internet service, Cox is also offering the following to
    help you and to keep you informed during this transitional period:

    Toll Free Customer Information Line (1-877-832-4751). You can call in for
    the latest updates as we work to quickly resolve any service issues.
    Website Message Center at Cox.com/info
    http://uuhttp.flonetwork.com/cgi-bin3/flo?y=eJIF 0C 8sRW0B460ork0AF
    We will provide online updates and a "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQ) section to
    address your concerns.
    Automatic Account Credits. We will credit your account automatically for
    service and leased equipment so that you are reimbursed for any time you
    are without service.
    Free, temporary dial-up Internet access. In the unlikely event that you
    should experience a service disruption, we have arranged for temporary
    dial-up access to the Internet via NetZero(R). In order to take advantage of
    this precautionary option, please see the "What Should I be Doing Right
    Now" section that follows.

    Cox has a long history of outstanding service in your community. We pride
    ourselves on providing high quality products and the best customer service.
    Please know that we are committed to our customers and understand the
    extent to which you enjoy the services we provide. We recognize that you
    have a choice in service providers and we will continue to do our best to
    remain your choice now and in the future. In advance, we apologize for any
    inconvenience that the Bankruptcy of our vendor Excite @ Home may cause
    you.

    Stay tuned for more details, and thank you for choosing Cox.

    Sincerely,

    The Cox High-Speed Internet Team
    Cox Communications, Inc.

    _______________________________

    What Should I be Doing Right Now?
    1. Check your Cox @ Home email daily. Opened messages will be saved
    automatically to your hard drive.
    2. Download free dial-up Internet software. In the unlikely event that Excite
    @ Home terminates your service, you would lose connectivity to the Internet and
    access to your Cox @ Home services such as email and webspace. We do not
    recommend that you install the software at this time, just download the software
    and save it so that it may be installed should you have an interruption in service.
    In order to restore access to the Internet and to set up a temporary email
    address, we recommend that you register for dial-up service via NetZero and
    download the necessary software. You will not be able to download the software
    from your home after your Internet service has already been disrupted. While a
    free dial-up connection is not ideal, it will give you temporary access to the
    Internet for surfing, making transactions, etc. However, you will not be able to
    access your Cox @ Home email accounts while the service is shut down. For
    information on how to download this software, please visit Cox.com/info
    http://uuhttp.flonetwork.com/cgi-bin3/flo?y=eJIF 0C 8sRW0B460ork0AF
    3. Back up your personal web page to your hard drive or to a CD. (This is a
    good precautionary measure to follow at any time.)
    4. In the unlikely event that there is a disruption in service, keep your cable
    modem connected to your PC until service is restored.
    5. Watch for more information from Cox on the transition of your service to
    Cox High Speed Internet. At such time that you can make the transition to our
    new service, Cox will be providing you with all of the information you need to make
    your transition as smooth as possible.

    Locally, Cox is taking over the excite network, calling it just the generic, "Cox High-Speed Internet" so hopefully I can still browse /. and the rest of the web for that matter.

    Mo Bandwidth. Mo Problems.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  94. Still Up And Running by amspencer · · Score: 1

    I've got Cox@Home in Omaha NE and I've had no interruptions or problems so far. This is a good thing since I've only got Sprint PCS for phone service. I decided after getting a cable modem, there was no need for a regular phone line (or modem). Since I've gotten used to fast Web access for the last three years, I'd had to take a step backwards.

  95. [OT] Re:more dns #'s by prog-guru · · Score: 1
    If they wanted to prevent the public from using their DNS servers, they would have one set of servers only accessible to their own customers, and another set accessible to the world, but which only served domains they were hosting. It's very easy to do, so it's silly of them to insinuate that we're "stealing" by using name servers which have been deliberately left open.

    You can do this with 1 BIND nameserver, use allow-recursion to specify who can use it, and any zone that is configured in named.conf will work for everybody.

    --

    chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
    /.: nothing appropriate.

  96. me... my cable works, and you're still wasting $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dumbass.

  97. Complete blackout. by Cyberdeck · · Score: 1

    Here in the East bay the lines are just dead. I have a good friend who recently signed on when Covad dropped the local service. Now @Home is dead. Back to dial-up.

    -C

  98. CT back up by Nameles · · Score: 1

    It went out for about an hour or two, I didn't keep exact track of time since I was playing Battle Realms. My friend called and bitched at tech support and taught them a few things.

    *sighs*

    @home tech support is horribly stupid.

  99. Downstream bandwidth to hell, for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the AT&T press release:

    http://www.att.com/press/item/0,1354,4100,00.htm l

    "Upstream and downstream speeds will be managed to provide a faster and more consistent broadband service."

    Why doesn't that sound too good to me.

    EOM

    1. Re:Downstream bandwidth to hell, for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a conversation I just had with a customer service rep for AT&T.
      Please note I was playing the mp3 "Garbage - Push It" repeatedly while
      in conversation with her. Please not that they will compensate you monetarily
      if your bandwidth is 'managed' during this time. I wonder if they're going to
      do something like '$5 per bit/sec lost'? Muh ha ha ha haaaaaa


      Session ID: 1486004


      Dear Customer,

      Here is the transcript of our conversation. You may print it or save it by using
      File|Print or File|Save As from the browser menu. You can also copy the transcript
      by highlighting the appropriate text and using the Edit|Copy menu command.


      Welcome blooga ...

      Connecting to server. Please wait...

      Connected to athchat02.broadband.att.com

      Sat, December 01 2001 07:30PM Mountain Standard Time

      https://help.broadband.att.com/index.jsp?pushedfro m=chat

      Hello! Welcome to AT&T Broadband Internet Online Customer Support Center.
      Your session ID # is 1486004.

      We apologize for the delay and appreciate your patience. A message from a customer
      care specialist should appear in the chat window shortly.

      To quickly find answers to questions you may have about your AT&T Broadband
      Internet service, check out our Fast Answers to Questions section above.

      To view any possible service interruptions in your area and to access other
      timesaving tools, click on the Service Tools section on the left navigation
      panel above.



      In-Amy has joined this session!

      In-Amy says: Hello, and thank you for contacting AT&T Broadband
      Internet. My name is Amy; I understand you want information regarding upstream/downstream.
      I would be more than glad to assist you with the same.


      You say: on this page : http://www.att.com/press/item/0,1354,4100,00.html
      it says there will be stream 'management' what does this mean?

      In-Amy says: In order to assist you with this, may I please have your full name,
      telephone number, primary login?

      You say: I'd rather not, if thats ok. This is not a matter of my personal
      account. It's a matter of finding out about policy changes at&t is making.

      In-Amy says: I apologize however for me to assist I need to locate your account
      and then work accordingly.

      You say: I don't understand; I don't want to give my personal information,
      i just wnat to ask a question. I'm allowed to skip that info in the beginning,
      and I'd like to skip it now, And besides that, I've talked to you before - and
      you didn't have a problem with it :\

      In-Amy says: Sorry, I don't have an access to the member services.

      You say: Riiight. Anyway, all I want to know is if there will be changes
      in the amount of bandwidth I have access to. In-Amy says: The new AT&T
      Broark as been built to optimize our customers' high-speed Internet experience.
      This means that customers speed settings will be set at 1.5 MB downstream to
      ensure that all customers receive an optimized broadband experience so that
      is lesser than the old bandwidth, right?

      In-Amy says: Our lightning-fast connection enhances Internet experiences through
      fast e-mail communication, quick access to research and surfing, a fantastic
      gaming experience, quick video clip and music downloads and a whole lot more.

      You say: thats right. And I know how to use the copy-and-paste functions too.
      But is it slower than my old conneciton?

      In-Amy says: I understand that, and it is only due to the transition process.

      You say: so it will be slower for a while, and then back to normal as soon as
      you hard-working folks can get it working?

      In-Amy says: The techs are working on the issue and it would soon be resolved.

      In-Amy says: Sure.

      You say: so upstream and downstream will be the same in a few weeks/months,
      right?

      In-Amy says: They would be settled soon.

      In-Amy says: We are waiting for the updates.

      You say: Settled means 'the same as they were' right?

      You say: As in my bandwidth will be the same eventually.

      You say: Give it to me straight up amy! No dodging allowed!

      In-Amy says: AT&T Braodband will communicate any new developements
      as they become available. I am sorry, but I do not have that information at
      this time.

      You say: So what you're telling me is that 'bandwidth management' as as new
      to you as it is to me?

      In-Amy says: Yes please.

      You say: Hmm. So exactly how will they contact me about this?

      In-Amy says: They would contact you through emails or phone call.

      You say: I can put in a special request with my favorite customer service rep
      "In

      -Amy" and she will mail me as soon as she finds out?

      You say: Wait, I'd have to give you my username if I did that. Nevemind.

      You say: Anyway, thanks for trying. I only have one other question.

      In-Amy says: Yes please.

      You say: In your own judgement, do you think they will ur bandwidth in any way
      that is different from the old service?

      You say: Or, better yet, am I going to be paying the same price for a service
      that is slower than the old one/

      In-Amy says: I apologize however I have no updates at this point in time.

      You say: Ok, one other question; am I going to be compensated monetarily for
      the lost bandwidth during the transition?

      In-Amy says: Even we are waiting for the updates.

      In-Amy says: Sure.

      In-Amy says: The money would be credited on your account.

      You say: Superb. I thank you for your time and patience, you're doing great.

      In-Amy says: Thank you for contacting AT&TBroadband Internet, goodbye.

      You say: byebye

  100. poor transition with Charter by DickieRay · · Score: 1

    For me, the Charter Pipeline installer didn't work. I unplugged the cable modem, then plugged it back in. Then I got the new address using DHCP and after a few minutes it worked. I switched my e-mail to:

    mail server: mail.charter.net
    SMTP server: smtp.charter.net

    The Charter support line works worse than their installer - they hang up every time.

    1. Re:poor transition with Charter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your charter mail settings should use the domain given out by the dhcp server for example for mail you woudl use

      outgoing/smtp: mail or smtp
      for incoming/pop: pop or pop3

  101. ...links to a porn site by Killio · · Score: 0
    At the bottom of the configuration page you link to, comes this:

    Web Browser:
    Home Page: http://www.XXX.com (You may, of course, choose any home page; for the latest information provided by us at AT&T Broadband Internet High Speed Service, we recommend the above.)

    Ooooopsies.

    1. Re:...links to a porn site by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Heh

      Actually, what I think happened was some tech or whatever put .XXX. in because he didn't know, and expected someone in marketing to fix the bug. I'd say it's probably more of a systematic failure then an individual subversion.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  102. I never used @home's DNS servers anyways by thilmony · · Score: 1

    visi.com dns servers rule!

    --
    YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
  103. really nice slashdotters will also add: by Erris · · Score: 1

    images.slashdot.org, 64.28.67.57. We sould not want to be without thinkgeed would we?

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  104. Dead in Fremont by stevew · · Score: 2

    I'm kinda fortunate - I've got DSL to the house too. I was playing with the idea of terminating the cable services (thus the DSL) and POOF - they did if for me ;-)

    Seriously, after having DSL for a month or so, and cable for four years, the cable service speed is nominally much faster, mainly because of it's ability to peek at higher performance. The DSL has been more reliable. When you have both, at least you have near 100% up time. My only real concern now is that Covad goes the way of @home. Then I'm truly screwed....

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
    1. Re:Dead in Fremont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coincidentally enough, I'm in Fremont, too, and I also have both cable modem and dsl service. The company I work for provides the dsl line, but I use the cable modem for personal stuff. So far I've had better service with cable, but I'm worried about how the change is going to affect that. Frankly, I'll be impressed if they get my service back up in a week, but in the meantime, I'm pretty lucky to have a backup.

      Steve

  105. Legion303 by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1

    You obviously didn't read it. Besides, we're talking minutes between replies with me waiting. And, why the hell would she take it personal? If she doesn't like it I'd be more than happy to talk to her managers. Besides if you read the heading you would see it was not intended for you dorkus.

    1. Re:Legion303 by Legion303 · · Score: 2
      You didn't understand her very simple questions, then treated her like shit for following the script she was supposed to. Read this again:

      In-Angela Stone says: Michael, may I know why do you want to discontinue the services?
      You say: I've paid you guys probably $1500 dollars or more over the last three years or so....
      You say: Now I am disconnected
      You say: YES I want to discontinue my service DUH!

      (Note that she wasn't asking you if you wanted to disconnect your service. "DUH!" indeed.)

      In-Angela Stone says: I am sincerely sorry for all the trouble this .

      (Note her apology and extreme grace after most likely dealing with assholes like you all day long.)

      You say: fortunately my Telocity back up DSL service is functioning fine so that I can 'chat' with you about being disconnected
      You say: can we get on with it?

      The proper thing to do if you're angry at a company is to ask to speak to someone in management and blast *them*, not the frontline people who don't know what's going on in the first place. If you want to be mature about it, that is. If you want to be a tantrum-throwing brat, you do it your way.

      -Legion

    2. Re:Legion303 by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1
      Again you fail to understand exactly how little grace was involved on her part. Each of her questions and or replies took minutes. I had made my wishes clear. Given how long it was taking for her to respond to each of my queries it was very reasonable that I had no patience left to play 20 questions.

      Presumably the reason for the questions is so that they can be passed on to her managers. I mean are you telling me that she personally cares about why I want to be disconnected? Obviously not, so in fact I was speaking to those I intended to receive the message. You pretty much missed the whole point. I really wasn't particularly angry, as is evidenced by what I had to say. Anyone taking offense would have had to have very thin skin indeed and should probably consider another career.

      So are you a shill for AT&T support?

      If you go to McDonalds and order a burger and after several minutes of fiddling you are told that the "needful thing will be provided" wouldn't you be sort of curious as to what you might actually get and when? I asked for a simple thing "disconnect me". I found the resulting conversation with what I was really beginning to think was an Eliza like program amusing. Really Turing would have been challenged. Also given the repetetive nature of some of the things she said I dont believe that she was "speaking" at all. She was merely selecting preprogrammed phrases (poorly done). In fact, when I questioned whether I was actualy just talking to a computer is when I finally received a direct response from her! Amazing!

      One possible explanation for why it took her so damn long to answer me each time is that she was answering (certainly not conversing with) several people at once, and consequently paying very little attention to each. Well that strikes me as rude as hell!

      Frankly given that I believe that she was speaking to several people and mostly just pushing buttons to select boiler plate text I think that for most of the 'chat', speaking to a computer would have been more satisfieing. Really she should be angry that her managers have structured her job such that she has become virtually indistinguishable from a machine.

      Let me make one thing completely clear. There was no tantrum involved. At no point was I anything other than amused and a bit impatient. Mad sounds completely different. In your case I am also amused but not impatient largely because I get the definate impression that you are human. So while you may not be as blessed in certain areas as some I find myself with less of an inclination towards derision.

  106. It's about politics and monopolies and margins by kimihia · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    That's a nice thought, but I think it is all about the capitalism you hold so dear.

    Apparantly the sweet spot for rolling out new services is a population of 3.5 million people. That means New Zealand, Ireland, and a couple of other countries are great testing pots for the rest of the world. Enough citizens to make it a fair test, and small enough to be controllable.

    Now, the question of monopoly ...

    High speed failed in England - it failed badly. British Telecom had the sweet spot of the monopoly, and it wasn't in any hurry to run DSL out to the exchanges and then set everyone up on them. It was raking in the cash with per-minute phone call charges. Why should it change? DSL isn't a very good financial proposition. And they used their monopoly to act poorly and give their customers a really bad taste. RIP broad band in the UK.

    High speed went OK in New Zealand - our local monopoly Telecom was getting its heels nipped by Saturn (now TelstraSaturn), and other people like the Lloyd Group were offering DSL, iHug had their satellite, and Walker Wireless had ... wireless. Because of the way Telecom had been privatised and the legislation stopping it eing a bully in some respects (Saturn and Lloyd Group still got a hard time) they ran out DSL, and quite a few people picked it up.

    New Zealand still has a shabby connections-per-hundred head of population ratio. US also has a shabby ratio too. South Korea is the best.

    But why? Because South Korea embraced that.

    In the US, take a look at them! Bickering over profits. Slack-bums not bothering to do the installs. And you wonder what went wrong?

    It's the mindset.

    And unfortunately for them the US has the wrong one.

    BTW, fibre optic cables installed at exchange up the road. :-)

    1. Re:It's about politics and monopolies and margins by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you to a large extent. I was just ranting about one single facet. I think it is a multitude of problems including my parent posts rant.

      Jeremy

  107. use a university or serve your own. by Erris · · Score: 1
    It's obvious that you have your dns taken care of. How else could you be posting to Slashdot? OK, you could be at work, sorry! Oh well, when the world sucks it's time to make things better for yourself.

    For those of you at work with dead DNS at home, try the following:

    www.google.com 216.239.35.101, look up DNS + name of local university.

    http.us.debian.org 141.213.4.21, add to /etc/apt/sources.list then run dselect as root and get task-dns-server

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  108. Bastards. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Sources at Excite@Home told Dotcom Scoop that the company planned to "send a message to one of the cable companies" by switching off service to customers.

    They sent a message to their customers too. "We don't give a shit about you."

    Forget Microsoft, these regional monopolies on cable bandwidth really show the problems that can happen when only one company has control. I mean, these guys just don't give a shit. I mean, sure the company is totally fucked, (so nothing for customers to be loyal to if they could be) but rather than "Sorry, we screwed up, but we're going to do everything we can to keep you guys connected." they're basically saying "We screwed up, fortunately for us, you guys can all help pay the price! Despite the fact that all you did was pay us what we asked and dealt with our crappy service".

    Personally, I think this is just more of the same shitty management. It's a shame that companies feel that they can be

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  109. Stupid move by at home? by pdqlamb · · Score: 3, Interesting
    AT&T, for all its problems, is the only one of their top three customers that has a chance of reconnecting its cable customers in a timely fashion. Why would excite go after the capable one, instead of making an example of Comcast or Charter?

    Mind you, since I'm on Comcast, I don't mind...

    1. Re:Stupid move by at home? by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      Because by cutting off AT&T, @Home gets to send a message to the cable companies without screwing over their customers. AT&T has a backup plan, so at most you have a 7 day outage. Now if Comcast and Charter don't play ball, @Home can tell then that they're really screwed.

    2. Re:Stupid move by at home? by LouisJBouchard · · Score: 1

      Charter is not playing ball. At least not in Minnesota or Wisconsin from what I see. Charter converted most of their users to their service (similar to what AT&T did/is doing).

      It looks like Charter, AT&T, and most Canadian Cable providers saw this coming and prepared with contigency plans (even if they would not acknowledge it until the last minute). The only companies I see that must play ball are Comcast, Cox, and Cablevison.

      @home though has already lost 1/2 of its subscriber base if not more. I do not see how this will help

    3. Re:Stupid move by at home? by phoneboy · · Score: 1

      Charter would be a really bad company to set an example with anyway, especially since they already have 90% of their cable modem customers on Charter Pipeline anyway. Unfortunately, I'm not one of them *yet*, but they tell me it will likely be available in a few days. Hey, at least my @Home service didn't experience any problems today (*knock on wood*).

      The cable companies want all the money and aren't willing to share it with anyone else, including those providing the service. That's the real problem here. At least if the Cable Companies provide the service themselves, they get all the cash and don't have to argue with Excite@Home about about how much they should get.
      Of course, Excite@Home may have signed it's own death warrant by making an enemy out of the Death Star.

      -- PhoneBoy "with his ISDN on standby"

      --
      The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of anyone, including the poster.
    4. Re:Stupid move by at home? by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      you *ARE* realizing that .. of course .. AT&T has a large % of DSL right ?

      now .. lets put 2 and 2 together ..

      if *YOU* controlled 52% of @home .. and *YOU* had an inferior and slow to market product (dsl) what would you do ?

      [or does everyone here think that the upstream caps happening JUST after the CEO of @Home was replaced with an ATT guy was happenstance ?]

      ATT is .. i believe .. currantly being brought to litigation of the gross (and deliberate) mis-management of @home.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  110. I'm sorry... by Legion303 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Awhile back, after getting sick of excite@home's spam and their ignoring my complaints, I complained to their advertisers directly, asking if they really wanted to be associated with a bunch of spamming morons who were about to be sued. I think their advertisers backed out, and that's the reason for this mess.

    My bad.

    -Legion

  111. Heh by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actualy, my hosts file looks like this:

    127.0.0.1 localhost
    127.0.0.1 ads.x10.com
    127.0.0.1 www.consumerinfo.com
    127.0.0.1 actionsplash.com
    127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.com
    127.0.0.1 www.travelzoo.com
    127.0.0.1 popup.msn.com
    64.113.72.34 autopr0n.com
    Gaping assholes I can deal with. The ads still pop up, but they show my own home page instead. (he last entry was from a time I lost DNS service and couldn't resolve my own site. It was vhosted so using the IP in the URL wouldn't work)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Heh by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      I went one better than that. I redirected them to a little machine on my network that has a custom listener on port 80.

      If requested for a .GIF or .JPG, it returns a 1x1 pixel white gif (IE displays a GIF correctly even if requested for a .jpg). Otherwise, it returns a blank html document.

      You should see stuff disappear!

    2. Re:Heh by Phork · · Score: 1

      any web browser should display a graphic corectly no matter what the filename is. a web browser doesnt look at the file name to determine hte file type, it looks at the http header. it is perfectly valid to have all the images on a website have the extension .html, just as long as the httpd knows that .html files are images.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    3. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about the ideal case, which doesn't apply to IE. It routinely ignores the mime type sent and does a combination of client-side extention mapping and magicfile type processing. For example, you can send a MPG movie as image/jpeg and IE would handle it with the media player. Netscape would probably explode. So the comment about IE jpg/gif handling is valid.

  112. Re:AT&T fully functional in Portland, but a bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yea... i've noticed the slowdown too.. looks like its now capped (wmnet show's sawtooth pattern of burst/halt/burst/etc) at 140k/s (that's bytes, not bits)... sad, as I had been getting 400-500k/s before

    also they added some junk in the service agreement about not using dynamic host names (albeit for commerical purposes).

  113. Covad's OK -- they secured more funding! by nbvb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's really not fair to "report" months-old news without checking for updates:

    Check out:

    Here

    and

    here.

    Covad's gonna be OK. Really.

    --NBVB

  114. http://autopr0n.com/ by bstadil · · Score: 1

    You sig is a day late and a dollar short. Regards Poor sod back on dial-up

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  115. haha by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The best was on page 7. "If you this (on penis) and love her, she will never seperate from you."

    Well, either that or she'll just steal it when she does :)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  116. email?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T is doing a fine job, except for email. I've lost all of my old email accounts, and they won't tell me if I'll get all that mail thats going to my old accounts. This owuld be all fine and dandy if it wasn't finals week. Now I have to somehow tell all of my teachers by monday to change my email addres, so I can get class info, assignments, and scores. Anyone know how they might be handling this??

  117. because he's wrong by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    While it's true that if you use the IP address you won't hit a vhosted server, that has nothing to do with the hosts file. the hosts file is just for overriding the DNS system on your own machine. And also, it wasn't the referrer HTTP header that affects VHosting, but rather the host header, (or a full URL in the http get statement).

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  118. Why wouldn't he? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    IE dosn't suck If you're running windows, there's really no reason not to. I've got mozilla (and just got ns4.79) for testing, but for plain web surfing IE really is the thing to beat.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  119. Hahaha by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    That's funny man. I checked and not only is it a porn site, but a popup-spewing one. They managed to open some tiny window that I couldn't close (damn IE bugs) that kept spawning them, I thought I was going to have to kill IE's process.

    These damn porn-site operators are the scum of the earth!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  120. Re:Comcast@Home, Harrisburg, PA is up as of 7PM 12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm also in harrisburg and have not had any service problems. Life is good as long as comcast stays up...I'm out of range for everything else other than dialup...

  121. It's not infestructure, it's bad management. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    And of course plain old spite.

    While it's true that America has a really good infrastructure, we're also the cheapest. @home had a bad deal to start with (they only got about $16/mo/user). They just didn't charge enough money ($4 more a month/user and they'd be firmly in the black)

    The fact that the connection is going down is simply spite and more bad management. They want to get more money out of att, and they're trying to force the issue. All they're really doing is making the value of the network approach zero. Instead of $300 million (30 cents on the dollar for what they paid) they're going to get jack shit. And they deserve it too.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  122. Or maybe it's just a joke by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    Obviously if they really didn't want people outside they're network to use their DNS systems they would have set it up like that.

    It's probably just a joke, since their IPs are so easy to remember. There could be a lot of people who's DNS servers are down using these, maybe they just wanted to 'remind' people to use other DNS servers when they could find them, without cutting them off from the 'net.

    Not everyone is a humorless bastard, you know.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  123. ATLANTIC telephone and telegraph, by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    (oxymoronic) AT&T Canada

    Actually, AT&T stands for Atlantic telephone and telegraph, at least it did when it started. And even if it stood for 'American' it still would be able to non-ironically wire up Canada, seeing as how it's on the American continent.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  124. FUCK AT&T by codewolf · · Score: 1

    Well, I am one of the many that has been disconnected today. I got online by doing the following:

    Bought a PCI modem from staples $49.95
    Bought a magazine at Barnes & Noble for $2.95

    Used the AOL CD to get connected using one of my last surviving Windows 98 computers in my house (one out of about 20 computers here)

    Back on line and getting trolled in IRC for using AOL, so not much difference in the connection, but at least I am connected ;-)

    now, if I could find that AOL Teens for Jesus chat room I could have some fun!

    I have no choice in the matter, changing DNS does nothing for me, I am SOL, and not having any internet connection this was a fast choice to get my e-mail back up (I use my own) and AT&T owns everything around here, cable TV, cable internet, phone service, and I have no access to DSL. I'd like to thank the US government for the choices they have provided the consumer when allowing AT&T to take over so many local cable companies!

    --
    http://www.codewolf.com - Just good stuff to waste time
  125. I talked with a cust. rep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a conversation I just had with a customer service rep for AT&T. Please note I was playing the mp3 "Garbage - Push It" repeatedly while in conversation with her. Please note that they will compensate you monetarily if your bandwidth is 'managed' during this time. I wonder if they're going to do something like '$5 per bit/sec lost'? Muh ha ha ha haaaaaa. Think of the implications...

    Session ID: 1486004

    Dear Customer,
    Here is the transcript of our conversation. You may print it or save it by using File|Print or File|Save As from the browser menu. You can also copy the transcript by highlighting the appropriate text and using the Edit|Copy menu command.

    Welcome blooga ...
    Connecting to server. Please wait...
    Connected to athchat02.broadband.att.com
    Sat, December 01 2001 07:30PM Mountain Standard Time
    https://help.broadband.att.com/index.jsp?pushedfro m=chat
    Hello! Welcome to AT&T Broadband Internet Online Customer Support Center. Your session ID # is 1486004.
    We apologize for the delay and appreciate your patience. A message from a customer care specialist should appear in the chat window shortly.
    To quickly find answers to questions you may have about your AT&T Broadband Internet service, check out our Fast Answers to Questions section above.
    To view any possible service interruptions in your area and to access other timesaving tools, click on the Service Tools section on the left navigation panel above.

    In-Amy has joined this session!
    In-Amy says: Hello, and thank you for contacting AT&T Broadband Internet. My name is Amy; I understand you want information regarding upstream/downstream. I would be more than glad to assist you with the same.
    You say: on this page : http://www.att.com/press/item/0,1354,4100,00.html it says there will be stream 'management' what does this mean?
    In-Amy says: In order to assist you with this, may I please have your full name, telephone number, primary login?
    You say: I'd rather not, if thats ok. This is not a matter of my personal account. It's a matter of finding out about policy changes at&t is making.
    In-Amy says: I apologize however for me to assist I need to locate your account and then work accordingly.
    You say: I don't understand; I don't want to give my personal information, i just wnat to ask a question. I'm allowed to skip that info in the beginning, and I'd like to skip it now, And besides that, I've talked to you before - and you didn't have a problem with it :\
    In-Amy says: Sorry, I don't have an access to the member services.
    You say: Riiight. Anyway, all I want to know is if there will be changes in the amount of bandwidth I have access to. In-Amy says: The new AT&T Broark as been built to optimize our customers' high-speed Internet experience. This means that customers speed settings will be set at 1.5 MB downstream to ensure that all customers receive an optimized broadband experience so that is lesser than the old bandwidth, right?
    In-Amy says: Our lightning-fast connection enhances Internet experiences through fast e-mail communication, quick access to research and surfing, a fantastic gaming experience, quick video clip and music downloads and a whole lot more.
    You say: thats right. And I know how to use the copy-and-paste functions too. But is it slower than my old conneciton?
    In-Amy says: I understand that, and it is only due to the transition process.
    You say: so it will be slower for a while, and then back to normal as soon as you hard-working folks can get it working?
    In-Amy says: The techs are working on the issue and it would soon be resolved.
    In-Amy says: Sure.
    You say: so upstream and downstream will be the same in a few weeks/months, right?
    In-Amy says: They would be settled soon.
    In-Amy says: We are waiting for the updates.
    You say: Settled means 'the same as they were' right?
    You say: As in my bandwidth will be the same eventually.
    You say: Give it to me straight up amy! No dodging allowed!
    In-Amy says: AT&T Braodband will communicate any new developements as they become available. I am sorry, but I do not have that information at this time.
    You say: So what you're telling me is that 'bandwidth management' as as new to you as it is to me?
    In-Amy says: Yes please.
    You say: Hmm. So exactly how will they contact me about this?
    In-Amy says: They would contact you through emails or phone call.
    You say: I can put in a special request with my favorite customer service rep "In
    -Amy" and she will mail me as soon as she finds out?
    You say: Wait, I'd have to give you my username if I did that. Nevemind.
    You say: Anyway, thanks for trying. I only have one other question.
    In-Amy says: Yes please.
    You say: In your own judgement, do you think they will ur bandwidth in any way that is different from the old service?
    You say: Or, better yet, am I going to be paying the same price for a service that is slower than the old one/
    In-Amy says: I apologize however I have no updates at this point in time.
    You say: Ok, one other question; am I going to be compensated monetarily for the lost bandwidth during the transition?
    In-Amy says: Even we are waiting for the updates.
    In-Amy says: Sure.
    In-Amy says: The money would be credited on your account.
    You say: Superb. I thank you for your time and patience, you're doing great.
    In-Amy says: Thank you for contacting AT&TBroadband Internet, goodbye.
    You say: byebye

  126. Re:Out of the frying pan... into the fire. by kireK · · Score: 1

    Covad is also in bankruptcy... just wait for all of the covad customers to go dark, and then where do you go, back to @Home?

  127. DNS Server by linuxtuba · · Score: 1

    At work, our @HOME T-1 was fine, but DNS was down. Hope that my dsl provider won't mind if I borrow the use of their server for a bit...

    ~Steve

  128. i feel your pain, brother by TheM0cktor · · Score: 1

    you poor gets, i really feel for you. For some people (read: us) having a net connection is second only to having food, water and beer

  129. Why this happened. by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, I've been telling you guys for a couple years now that cable modem companies couldn't make money at $40 a month, that they'd break even closer to $50 a month.

    Now, we have a cable modem provider charging $40 a month, and losing $6 million a week from 4 million customers.

    That means they'd break even if they were taking in an extra $6 a month per subscriber. Assume 33% for income tax, it comes out to $9 more per month per subscriber.

    In other words, somewhere between $46 and $49 a month, they break even...

    Gee, imagine that.

    Meanwhile, RoadRunner is charging around $45 to $50 a month, if you also have cable TV, which is where they make all the money, and they're not going out of business. All you @Home folks who were bragging 'cause you were paying less, and especially those of you who were bitching that $40 a month was unreasonably high, congratulations; you priced yourself back into dialup.

    1. Re:Why this happened. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Ok, I've been telling you guys for a couple years now that cable modem companies couldn't make money at $40 a month, that they'd break even closer to $50 a month.

      @Home was getting $12/month from AT&T etc. They claim they would make money at $16/mo.

    2. Re:Why this happened. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, @Home didn't go bankrupt merely because they didn't charge enough for services. In fact, I don't think this is it at all. I would say poor management is #1. You can filter it down from there.

      Plus, you have to distinguish "cable modem companies" from @Home. One way that it works is an MSO (local cable company) resells @Home service. The MSO and @Home take their appropriate cuts of that $40 / month.

      Broadband internet is doing quite well in the profit arena. I think @Home just made many poor management decisions (among other things).

    3. Re:Why this happened. by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

      "...congratulations; you priced yourself back into dialup."

      Hmm. So you're saying I should have contacted customer service and insisted that I should be charged more, because "no, really, you guys can't make money at $40/mo".

      Not bloody likely.

      These companies are supposed to be run by business-savvy individuals, who should be able to determine what price to charge based on the number of subscribers, forecasts of growth, infrastructure costs, etc.

      I think the biggest problem was dumping money down the Excite-hole, trying to cash in on the "portal craze". At any rate, I doubt that any of the people at the top of the @home food chain are going to lose money. They could give a rat's sphincter about how many customers lose broadband as long as they can keep buying a new SUV every year.

      The implication you make that this is somehow the fault of the subscribers is simply ludicrous.

      --
      -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
  130. Re: RAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Redundant Array of Inexpensive Links

    BAHAHAHAHA. For that price I would get a frac T1 and always be up.

    If you are really paranoid you should start up a fido net node.

  131. Today's User Friendly by myov · · Score: 1
    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  132. An open letter to Comcast@home by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    I am a Michigan Comcast@home subscriber who has been affected by the statewide DNS outage today. This isn't a complaint! I want to give Comcast@home a HUGE thank you for disabling DNS service in my state today.

    Because Mom and Pop McDonalds can't figure out how to set their own DNS servers, they aren't online clogging up the tubes with eBay bids on salt and pepper shakers, forwarding the same damn racist joke emails to mailing lists, downloading pr0n, sending stupid 2MB RTF greeting card emails, and instant messaging with Kristy about how much of an asshole Brad was at the bar last night.

    Thank you so much for cutting out all that crap. Today has been the fastest day since I hooked up 2 years ago. I can now reload my Slashdot user page to check my karma with great speed and justice.

    Keep up the good work!

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:An open letter to Comcast@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everything you mentioned sounds like better content than you're moronic message.

  133. Argh, Comcast@home modem keeps resetting... by Carnivore24 · · Score: 0

    Everything was fine until 9am Saturday morning. It slowly got worse throughout the day. I will be lucky if I can send this message out before it starts resetting itself again. They must be doing something to the networks. Hopefully they arent slowly disabling the entire network.

  134. RE: Some People @Home, Some Not @Home by manofyunk · · Score: 1

    This seems like nothing more than high-tech extortion. To top this off it seems that "our" government (or at least the judicial system) supports this behavior.

    --
    Byte me, Doughboy!!!
  135. New hostnames for AT&T by ShadowBlade · · Score: 1

    Question for those that have already bee transitioned to the new network: if my old hostname was c123456-a.city.state.home.com, what would my new hostname be on AT&T's network? I could probably get back online if I knew what my new IP address would be.

  136. From my perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One cannot blame an MSO for not having a replacement network set up to service @Home customers if @Home should go dark. It is too complicated to elaborate fully here, but I'll summarize a few points.

    First and foremost, one must look at @home as a completely separate entity from the MSO. Even though the @Home equipment may be in the same rack as the MSOs equipment, it's still a completely separate network. It's like two completely separate ISPs who just so happen to be housed in the same building. Image ISP 1 going bankrupt and saying "here you go ISP 2, here's X thousand customers". Imagine getting thousands of customers in a day and having to provide connectivity, mail, web, DNS, etc. Sure, the MSOs may have seen this coming for a few months, but there are far too many factors involved to just say "the MSO should've had another network set up to handle this."

    Example: perhaps an MSO just isn't able to replace @Home's bandwidth in such a short amount of time. Example: a DS3 line may take months on order. Try replacing, say, five DS3s in just a few months. Even with expedited service, you're looking at several months minimum to installation.

    Let's not forget: provisioning, e-mail, web, DNS, DHCP, and all the equipment to support these servicing. Some equipment may take weeks on order to get, not to mention the time it would take to set all this up. @Home has an entire system setup to handle all this. The MSO may have to buy and build it from scratch.

    So, one question I've seen is, why didn't the MSO purchase all this equipment / bandwidth at the first signs of @trouble? One reason may be the contract signed between the MSO and @Home. Perhaps one provision states that the MSO cannot provide a similar service (i.e. a residential service comparable in price to @home). So the MSO is stuck, having to "ride out the wave" of @Home trouble. Will they go dark? Will they get bought out? Perhaps all the MSO can do is wait...

    Perhaps the MSO could have purchased the equipment and bandwidth "just in case." But, what if @Home would have gotten bought out? The contracts may still have been valid...oops, MSO now has contracts signed for replacement bandwidth and has purchased millions in equipment that now gets shelved.

    So perhaps some of you see the dilemma of an MSO. And this is only a very brief summary...

    1. Re:From my perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they already have this network in place??? but they havent had to use it, because they'd rather renegotiate the contracts with @home.

      i know at least 1 MSO has their network(backbone and routers) almost all ready to go, but they dont have things like mail servers, content and whatnot ready to go. they'd rather stick with @home for now.. and transition away at thier own convienence..

  137. Re: [don't] FUCK AT&T by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2, Informative
    Join 'em..

    er...

    What I mean is, check out worldnet.att.net as a dialup.

    Linux friendly; see: www.wurd.com/eng/setup/dialers/linux.html "Linux and AT&T WorldNet® Service"

    They also have a newsgroup: worldnet.help.software.dialers.unix-variant

    $21.95 a month unlimited, 56K, re-dialers welcome.

    Anyway, have some self-respect..

    ...I mean, AOL?

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  138. Just one problem by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    How do they get to this site to read all this sage advice?

    Chicken & egg, a web site saying if you can't get online do this.

  139. IP over Avian Carrier (RFC1149) by 3D+Lover · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the customers of @home need to take a serious look at a more reliable system of internet connectivity than the TCP-IP over Excite@Home. The IP over Avian Carrier (RFC1149) may just do the trick.

  140. Photos by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny
    Coincidently (?) their building sign only has "Excite@" illuminated (the "home" portion is dark)... or maybe it's irony... sarcasm ? ^_^



    OK, I'll bite. I just drove up there.

    Here are some hilarious images of this classic f**cked company.

    1. Re:Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!

      I enjoyed the photos!

    2. Re:Photos by Abstrakt · · Score: 1
      Here are some hilarious images of this classic f**cked company.
      Thanks for the pix!! ;)

      Seeing that pathetic sign is quite saddening, actually. It boggles the mind to think that a company with so much potential could run itself into the ground so quickly...

  141. Downtime... by sinco · · Score: 1

    Here in the Pittsburgh area our ATT cable internet went down, around 11am, like many other cable subscribers. ATT claims it should be back for our area within 7 days. Luckily there was a LAN party tonight so I could get net access or else I would be a sad puppy. It's truly sad that this had to happen.

  142. All idiots by bstadil · · Score: 1

    These guys collectively paid $785M for Bluemountain. The silly Electronic Hallmark site. It had no income to speak of and no business plan to ever make anything. These guys bought it and financed some of it via bonds.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  143. Sharing a connection on the new service by antihero · · Score: 1

    When I woke up this morning I woke my PowerBook G4
    to see if service was still up. The flakey AirPort wasn't on, so I went to my desktop machine to test with it. I got the page with instructions to move to the new service and made it happen. So the desktop machine was happy.

    Then I went back to the PB and AirPort was up again, got the same page with instructions, but have had no luck whatsoever getting it online period. I've tried to use the base station for routing, tried plugging the PB in and not using wireless, tried everything in Mac OS X and Mac OS 9, even trying the configurator software in 9. No dice.

    With @home I had bought another IP to share the connection using a hub. Now I can't even get my other machine on alone. What's going on and what could I try? The tech supports have only been able to tell me they're in the process of migrating me over, but I don't see a magical fix coming for this problem. Any help or pointers would be much appreciated.

    --
    antihero http://www.xappeal.org- Daily OS X News
  144. Hrm by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Well, I mean I don't have a problem with legit advertizing, banners or whatever. But popups must die. Unforunetly my hosts hack is a bit out of date.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  145. AT&T letter today... by musicscene · · Score: 1

    To: rrcustomer.care@broadband.att.com
    From: customer care
    Subject: ACTION REQUIRED - AT&T Broadband Internet

    PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE. REPLY MESSAGES WILL
    NOT BE ROUTED PROPERLY TO A CUSTOMER CARE SPECIALIST.

    Dear Valued Customer,

    Recently, AT&T Broadband sent you communications regarding Excite@Homes bankruptcy filing. As we stated in this communication, AT&T Broadband was taking precautionary measures to develop alternative homepage content in the event AT&T was unable to purchase the Excite@Home network.

    We are sending this email to notify you that AT&Ts proposal was rejected. Therefore, AT&T Broadbands current @Home homepage content will no longer be available. In its place, we will be providing a new homepage featuring Yahoo, at http://home.attbroadband.com/. All other aspects of the service, such as email and Internet access will not be affected by the homepage content change.

    If your homepage is set to home.excite.com, upon opening your browser, you will be automatically redirected to a website outlining instructions to reset your homepage.

    The step-by-step instructions for supported IE browsers are listed below: 1. Open your browser 2. Go to the new homepage http://home.attbroadband.com/ 3. Click the Tools menu, then select Internet Options 4. Click Use Current 5. Click Apply and then Click Ok 6. You are ready to go with your new home page being http://home.attbroadband.com/

    If you have additional questions concerning the new homepage, please view the Announcements and Updates section at http://help.broadband.att.com/.

    While we realize this change may cause some inconvenience, please be assured that we are working hard to provide you with the best high-speed cable Internet service possible.

    We appreciate your patience and your business.

    Sincerely,

    Susan K. Marshall
    Senior Vice President
    Advance Broadband Service

    --
    "I'm not ashamed I can't function in society like I'm supposed to." - Paul Westerberg
  146. ATT@HOME in the Silicon Valley, California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey all. Im in the silicon vally, actually fremont california to be exact. This is where cable internet began, but for some reason, the people working at ATT is laggin on the migration here. I did know about the problems with the service, but there was no notice ahead of time. the only notice came at around 3pm today, about 9 hours too late. When i contacted their customer service, they said that it should be up by next week, but will not be up for at least 48 hours. When i asked about how it will be done, or even, what kind of service change there will be, or even what exactly was the problem all they said was, "We dont think you need to know that" maybe that was just the 3 people i spoke to this morning at around 10, but not having internet, IN THE SILICON VALLEY for more than 48 hours? i think that's absurd!!! I am happy for all who didnt have a problem becuase u have compitent service providers, but i must say, ATT needs to get their act together in this area. Even if they cant get things up and running, they should at least make you feel less frustrated, rather than finishing the call with a statement that utters "too bad. Sucks to be you!!!" more than that, they should help answer our questions. WE ARE YOUR CUSTOMERS. i think we should know about what is going on. oh by the way, if everyone can help me, i am filing complaints to the customer care person at att. Nausheen (id number 4033) is the worst at customer care. people, help me rid ATT of this incompetent, poor excuse to customer service!

  147. @home in gaithersburg md by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are still up so far

  148. Customer service scripts by Eric+Green · · Score: 2
    Dude, she was reading off of a customer service script. Every time you asked her a question, she had to go read through question-answer stuff to figure out what she was supposed to tell you. She's not allowed to make up her own answers, if you ask her a question that's not in her customer support scripts she's supposed to forward you to second-line support. She can get fired for giving a different answer than what is on the script. You don't think that managers of front-line support monkeys expect said monkeys to THINK, do you?

    This is standard practice in the industry, except that this "Angela" that you talked to appears to be a rather slow reader, based on your experience. Oh well, guess it's hard to hire good technical help for $8/hour!

    --
    Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    1. Re:Customer service scripts by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1
      Eric, you are right on the mark.

      As a customer who has paid a considerable sum of money for the service I've received I deserve better than that. I don't blame her. But, given what you've said I would have been just as well off messaging with a computer.

      If I don't tell her that she's being treated like a machine who will? At some point her dignity will be worth more to her than that job. If I am going to talk with a person I want to feel like I am making some sort of contact. I mean otherwise what's the point? Why is it wrong of me to find it both amusing and dismaying that a company I've paid a great deal of money to feels its apropriate to trick me into speaking with a manikin who's every word they dictate? Why don't they just hook wires to her brain and leave it in a vat of nutrient fluid? It would be more honest. But how would she have answered my question then? Would she have still claimed to be human?

      It's odd. I've had some responses from people who are under the misimpression that I was attacking her. I think a more accurate description is that these people are upset that I did not act like a computer! I have news for them; dream on. The real problem here is that I did not provide the expected conventional responses right? So basically I am supposed to behave according to the script also. That is the real problem. Interestingly many Americans have already accepted that propaganda. I certainly will not apologize for displaying my humanity and attempting (and partially succeeding) in eliciting hers. It may have been a brief moment, but, for that brief instant she was not reading from her script! Hallelujah!

      Here's a message then for AT&T:

      Don't force your valued employees and customers into the humiliation of acting like computers. In fact its worse that that, into the servants of computers insofar as their responses are preprogrammed by you and must be typed into computers. It isn't being an asshole to expect to talk to a god damned person when that is what I am told I am doing! Now there is something worth being mad about and you should make no mistake about it my anger is directed towards AT&T (not Angela who I hope will find a better job)

    2. Re:Customer service scripts by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 2

      Still, you were giving her shit, plain and simple. Don't give the front liners shit OK, people?
      We don't make the decisions and we don't make enough to care about you. We will pretend as best as we can to keep from getting fired, that's all. We don't see your $40 a month pal, so if you want to talk to a manager who can get something done, go down to the damn offices in person, because *everybody* thinks that they are important enough to speak to a manager.

      If you were really concerned with venting against those responsible, you would have explained right off the bat to "Angela" that you were on a hell-ride and that you would like to speak to her supervisor by phone or smoke-signal. Instead you pissed and moaned and if you're lucky, you made her Top 50 list of Assholes for the Day.

    3. Re:Customer service scripts by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1
      Since you don't care about the customers my amusement was at no ones expense. So whats the proble? Not sticking to the script does not constitute "giving shit". I am not obligated to give the answers either she or AT&T expected.

      I had no expectation that I wouldn't get what I wanted so wasn't mad, just amused. I neither pissed nor moaned. She should have seen it as an opportunity for a diversion from and otherwise boring day.

    4. Re:Customer service scripts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you are all missing the boat here: Due the needful is a common response from help desk personal in India. We have an India helpdesk where I work, and almost all of the tickets request that the desktop techs or net admins "do the needful". They say it over the phone constantly. It is a cultural thing; "A small help" instead of asking for a favor is also something they commonly say.

      Much of the delay probably was trying to translate the extra things you said. She likely didn't understand the eliza comment because she never heard of it... using old american computer cliches with a low paid support rep in India probably would not elicit the desired results.

  149. Comcast@HOME NJ...No DNS...but still running by FKell · · Score: 1

    Lost DNS somtime between 7pm and now, but luckily I wrote down the IP for slashdot.org and some very generous people had posted some DNS servers to use... I am using verison's DNS right now, which isn't that bad considering I use Version DSL from my apartment, so in theory I am paying for its use already.

  150. Sorry. You are the weakest link! Goodbye! by yuriwho · · Score: 2

    Here's the scene..The excite@home network provides access for ~4-5 million customers. ~900,000 of those are att@home customers. AT&T wants excite to go bankrupt so that they can buy Excite for a steal at 300 mil or so. AT&T does not have a broadband network of their own yet. They cannot possibly convert all their customers over to AT&T unless they buy broadband networks from someone (namely excite!). The other companies dealing with Excite are Cox, Comcast and Charter. Cox and Comcast at negociating new deals with Excite. Charter has their own broadband network (Pipeline) to convert customers over to. AT&T is playing a chicken game with Excite right now. Excite has played the latest card (bluff?) and shut off all the AT&T at home suscribers. Charter has switched all their customers over to Pipeline. I'm not sure what Cox and Comcast are doing but I do know that they are re-negociating contracts with excite right now and have treated Excite with respect. Excite has responded in kind. They have told AT&T to FSCK OFF and tried to keep the others online.

    I'll be willing to bet that many customers will switch from AT&T to DSL or other competitors unless AT&T agrees to pay a reasonable amount to acquire the Excite network within the next few days.

    Bottom line...AT&T is losing money fast and pissing off many customers right now. I'll bet they offer excite >450 million on monday!

    This wil be interesting. I'm just glad I have charter (now Pipeline) service.

    Y

    --
    no sig.
    1. Re:Sorry. You are the weakest link! Goodbye! by noweb4u · · Score: 1

      AT&T is cutting customers over to this network you claim doesn't exist as we speak... I have confirmed reports that at minimum several places in Oregon are now on AT&T's network, and their cablemodem's IP is in the 12.0.0.0/8 owned by AT&T.
      The idea is they say they're worth more, and try to extort more money out of companies to stay running. AT&T said hell no, and took their ball and went home.
      Most of my friends have AT&T, and they're happy that they didn't cave in to the demands of @Home's bondholders.
      AT&T actually knows how to run a network, unlike @home. I am curious to see how much clue they have about ways to increase revenue, such as selling tiered bandwidth service (Don't like 1.5/128, pay $10 more and you can get 2/256 or something, for example).
      Anyway, I wish I lived in an AT&T area right now, maybe later that would change, but for now it sounds like they have something good going for them.

      Besides, do you think a company that just lost 500,000 customers that already has a burn rate of 6 million a week is going to be in business much longer? Doubt it - the day of reckoning is coming for the other MSOs.

    2. Re:Sorry. You are the weakest link! Goodbye! by calags · · Score: 1

      Switching to DSL or a different provider is not as easy as it sounds. In a lot of areas you only have one choice for cable Internet access. Switching to DSL with the lead times involved is also a pathetic joke. Also bear in mind that DSL service has its own set of headaches.

      Most AT&T customers are better off waiting to see if AT&T can complete their cutover from Excite within the ten days promised. In the interim, some will have to make do with dialup access.

      What I personally find disappointing is that the judge allowed the service cutoffs to occur because he thought there were no "life-threatening" consequences involved. Obviously, he doesn't have a broadband network connection.

      --
      Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  151. Re:I'm back online, too by reezle · · Score: 1

    On our part of the ATT Cable network (Portland OR), all DNS pointed to the switch page. I had connectivety, but could only browse the page on how to switch over to the new system. (I still had an Excite IP, and external computers were able to get into my system for Web, FTP, TS, Mail, Etc...) I think the changeover was exceedingly smooth. They left a good window where both services were running concurently. Who could ask for more?

  152. It worked, but wait ... by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I tried your trick and it worked for me, but then I tried DHCP and that worked also. The catch is that you have to set your system hostname to the one provided by AT&T when you signed up. If you do not, the DHCP server will not give you an IP address.

    I did this once to determine my IP address and have now gone back to static IP address.

    And ofcourse the DNS servers did not work, but that is an easy fix.

    1. Re:It worked, but wait ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dhcp client is sending an AT&T assigned hostname in its requests and I'm still not seeing anything coming back. But I'm up for now and happy with that for the short term.

    2. Re:It worked, but wait ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in FC too (Prospect and Taft Hill), and haven't had any luck with the DHCP servers using the AT&T hostnames (DHCP on my windows box, Static on the Linux box). I have solid connection lights after several hours of blinking. I'll have to try your suggestion once I get back home.

    3. Re:It worked, but wait ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also in FC (near HP), and can't get any response via DHCP. I'm using a Linksys router, which is configured with the ATT hostname and using "@home" as the domain name (does that even matter?).

      I've got solid lights on the modem, but no other actions will work. Any thoughts?

      Thanks!

  153. Not To Bad..... by orion9d · · Score: 1

    I am a 2 year @home user, and I have to say that despite all the odds, they managed to get me up and running within hours of the cutover. I live in Iowa, and I can honestly say that my service has been fantastic.

  154. Seattle service supposed to be back Sunday morning by berniecase · · Score: 1

    According to a report on Channel 5 (KING-TV) here in Seattle, AT&T is supposed to have everybody in the Seattle area switched over to the AT&T Broadband Internet (sans @Home) by Sunday morning.

    We'll see, but here's hoping.

  155. all my own damn fault. by motherhead · · Score: 1

    back in October of 1997 mine was one of three Chicago suburbs selected to test Mediaone Express/Roadrunner broadband cable modems. I could not have been happier with them and it since. The tech support was 24/7 stocked with real geeks with real solutions and did not flinch when you said dirty words like "Linux" "Mac" or "Routers". I have never had that luck with any tech support anywhere, ever.

    Then it happened, the great Satan AT&T bought my beloved Mediaone Express about a year ago. I knew then that I should have jumped ship. But nothing really changed except the address on the bills, so... well, why not. I stayed.

    Then once day I logged on and when I opened my browser... well looky that... it was the great "non-shall-pass-until-you-obey" AT&T registration page, that I never received the info-packet that was necessary to "obey&quot... well then, I was f*cked, until I realized that if I went straight to the cable modem from the PC (no matter the OS) there was no such directed url... well, hmmm... it was router blocks they were attacking... pissed at me for not buying extra IP.. Still I called and swore bloody murder and though I knew I should have jumped ship...the guy on the phone (ex-mediaone mind you) got me my info, set up a proper new email addy, had all my mediaone services completely replaced with auto-responders and services that when I eventually received my "info packer" were never mentioned and then proceeded to instruct me on how to set up my programmable router to function exactly the way it was with AT&T leaving my shit alone, all without their software, their shitty IE browser, and they rest of the crap they insisted I must use to remain a customer... so I stayed.

    Well now I've been bent over and raped. I never got a message, an email, a phone call, whatever. I just went to check email this morning and the "cable" light is dead, no connectivity. Nothing. Then the calls from friends in the area with the same service came in... yep. pooched. I read about the excite@home problems, but it never mentioned my area, and the truth is... I never heard of excite@home in my life. Hell AT&T@home, is like 11 months old around here. So I call, all I get is this message, "If you are calling in regards to broadband internet service, AT&T is no longer providing it"... what the fuck, then they mention a phone number they are going to be installing soon to call... heh.

    I am jumping ship. forever. No more AT&T long distance, no more AT&T digital cable (about time I got me a dish) and in two phone calls I set up DSL service (I am going ameritech first because they can get me up the fastest but I hate them too, so then once I am on and happy, a leisurely switch to Earthlink DSL or whoever sucks less then ameritech). I am lucky enough that I live near major trunks and hubs and pretty much can get whatever is offered. Oh and Ameritech was kind enough to set me up with the dial up that I am using currently to post this. Thank god my G4 had a built in modem that I almost forgot about since all I have is another apple laptop with one... I haven't installed a modem in a box of mine in years. Though... all my Linux boxen are now hung out until I pick up a 3com.

    My point is this, I knew AT&T was shit, have known it for a while and my complacency f@cked me in the end. I really could not care if they restore service this afternoon, or in 2-10 days. They are history, they f@cked me before and they will again, and again and again...

    that is until I stop bending over for them, I encourage all of you to do the same.

  156. Corporate Whore by skitz0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll be the first to tell you I'm a AT&T Whore. AT&T's handeling of this is horrible. I work for the recently split off AT&T Wireless and can truly say i've never been more ashamed to be affiliated with the AT&T name.

    I'm a California baised AT&T Broadband customer and everyone in this area confirms that like me, they never received any notification (email, snail mail, phone, smoke signal) that their would be a potential outage, e-mail address changes, provider change, etc.

    I spent a good 2 hours this morning trying to reach a representative to find out when my service would be back up (10 days is a big window). Every number was busy or sent me to an IVR that dumped me to a prerecorded message saying my service would be back up withen 10 days, blah, blah, blah.

    I finally called and took the route for new service. It was answered withen 20 Seconds (BASTARDS!). I asked the representative that answered to help me and was read some script they give the phone monkeys, and told that their was a mailer sent out on the 12th of Novemeber and possibly due to the terrorist attacks via the mail system it could be delayed (I got my bill from them today postmarked nov 28th). I've done phone customer care and know how much it sucks, but I had to laugh at that numbskull response and ask if that was his own thought or if it was a script.... That's when he promptly told me he was terminating the call.

    However when I did get backonline with a old dialup that was thankfully still active The AT&T Broadband Help site was no help at all. I check out some of the other providers and I don't understand how Rogers can give such stellar customer service via one web page.

    Check out thier transistion support page....

    http://www.rogershelp.com/transitionupdate.shtml #d ec1-1

    And not even be shut down yet, while AT&T who is offline can't even give it's customers basic information.

    1. Re:Corporate Whore by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Horrible? For being the only ones cut from @Home at this time, and having MOST OF THEIR CUSTOMERS on their own network, with a simple change to DHCP IP assignment, they did very, very good compared to all the DSL providers. I have mod points, and instead of moderating you down, I decided to reply.

    2. Re:Corporate Whore by skitz0 · · Score: 1

      Most of their customers? You must be one of the 10% that lives in Oregon/Washington that got fliped over without any problems. 10% is no where close to most...

      Either way I was harping more on the customer service aspect of it. 10% of customers being satisfied (I'd have to guess it's much lower since they are having to change email addresses) is not very good.

      While I understand it's 'just internet access' I'm sure most here would agree that its much more then that, a simple email change with little or no notification is a pretty hard thing to swallow.

      oh yeah. modirate this 8=D(0)^8

    3. Re:Corporate Whore by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      1. Well, 1 million + customers? 100,000 is a lot, considering they did it on a Saturday in a few hours. Give em a Sunday break!

      2. Okay, ATT's customer service does suck.

      3. You're right, especially with geeks

      4. Damn, you cant moderate in something you replied to :P

    4. Re:Corporate Whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Sunnyvale, CA, have AT&T, and I got a snail mail and an email about the possible outage.

  157. Here's what happened by TekPhobia · · Score: 1
    Sorry, I'm too lazy to read all the comments, so apologies if this is redundant.

    I woke up Saturday morning, try to load up Google.....but it seemed as if AT&T's DNS servers were set up to redirect all queries to http://newuser.attbi.com (as per the snail-mail letter). So, voila, I end up there, download their config utility (yea, I'm on windoze box, shoot me) and after a reboot I'm back in action. My host name is now computername.attbi.com (as opposed to computername.city.state.home.com)and my IP is 12.xxx.xxx.xxx (don't have it memorized yet; too lazy to look at winipcfg ). So, no more 24.xxx.xxx.xxx.

    Everything went REAL smooth for me, others in my hood weren't so lucky. However, I gave them my DNS server IPs and they made up their own IP address and it worked. So, from the few posts I did read, it seems as though you can bypass AT&T's DNS servers until they get their act together.

    -Tim

  158. SanBruno@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My connection is still good, went down for a few min. thismorning. i have not been using their dns servers at all so i am not sure if they went down here i was told that if it did go down it would be 4 days untill it would come back up.
    on one of my machines i did a traceroute and saw that it did bounce through some home.net servers hmmm ya

  159. 3AM PST @home SEATTLE WA is UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My netgear RT314 just picked up new DHCP settings and domain (attbi.com) as of 3am PST.

    Seattle WA @home is UP =)

  160. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is an on-topic FP at -1?

  161. Shaw Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Absolutely NO one has made mention of this, but the one company that has been exempt from discontinuation of service from the Judge's ruling is Shaw Cablesystems serving western Canada. All @Home services still being used by Shaw (Content, Mail, Webspace and News) have never stopped working for this transition period. DHCP/DNS/Proxies/Provisioning is all done in-house. Gives customers more time to switch to the new services.

    // marc

  162. @home aup by xzibit · · Score: 1

    as of 12-2-01 at 3:30am I was moved over to attbi.com but the dns servers didnt work, neither did the news server. One thing I dont get is they have 2 different AUP's for attbi and the @home customer care couldn't tell me which one that I am going by, http://newuser.attbi.com/attbi.com.ATTB_Sub_Agr.ht ml and http://help.broadband.att.com/faq.jsp?content_id=1 107&category_id=34&lobid=1 the first listed AUP does not say you can not run a server but the second one says you cant.

  163. Completely UP in Seattle by zzyzx · · Score: 1

    I booted up my computer this morning, and I had been switched over already. Change worked seemlessly; I didn't have to do anything. Cool!

  164. DNS server by lposeidon · · Score: 0

    try 24.217.0.3 and 24.217.0.4
    i know these work after the big change over. @home just became @hell oficially. :)

    --
    Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
  165. Cyclici solution by TheNut · · Score: 1

    How, pray tell, would the slashdotter@home read the introduction on slashdot.org telling them how to resolve slashdot.org if they can't resolve slashdot.org?

    --

    Learning at some schools is like drinking from a Firehose

  166. Still up and running - ?through road runner?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friday, i read that i had only 3.5 hrs of online time left, so of course, i panicked and started checking out every dsl provider in the area (wouldn't have minded the slower speeds for their open port policy)...of course, no luck (I live in the sticks). Got desperate, tried RoadRuner (I am/was on Comcast@Home)...typed in my zip, and they told me their service was available...through Comcast

    Has Comcast switched their backbone to RoadRunner?

    I don't even _know_ my @home email address anymore, so i can't verify whether or not comcast has done this

  167. Time for Action by demophoon · · Score: 1

    Even though I was only a temporary victim in the Excite@Home debacle (Mediacom claims they were cut off from @home "by mistake" -- it was only down for about 10 hours -- do I believe them? no), it occurs to me that the wrong people are making the decisions. Those of us who actually make technology work are ones who need to take charge, rather than the politicians, lawyers, and judges who seem bent only on destruction. Why do we keep letting them get away with it? It would seem to me that since Judge Thomas Carlson of the Ninth Circuit decided that consumers come last in the @Home mess, he should understand what the real effect is. He says that, "While the cessation of customers' Internet access is regrettable, it does not jeopardize public health or safety." Regrettable? I'm guessing he would find it very regrettable indeed if he didn't have internet access himself. I'm sure he and his staff depend on it as much as we do and I believe if he takes our access away, his should be removed as well, along with that of all the bondholders (apparently there is no list of them anywhere) and other vultures who have forced this issue. These days, it seems to me that there are five main enemies of technology: the RIAA, the MPAA, the telcos and cable companies who have fought open access every step of the way, publishers who think their so-called intellectual property is more important than the Constitution, and the monopolists who want to control all technology. To further their aims, they have hijacked our own government and turned it against us. Just as guilty are the members of Congress who were bought and paid for by these special interests and the members of the judiciary who consistently rule against any online rights for anyone outside these special groups. Let's track down the individuals who are leading this assault on the technology we create and our freedom to use it. How long do you think these organizations would be able to continue without the technology we make for them? If you are an ISP, I believe you should cut off these people altogether and refuse them service altogether. (Wouldn't it be ironic if the judge's service were cut off by one of the very companies in the case he just ruled on?) If you make software or web pages for these people, quit; there are other companies and organizations that do have some integrity to work for. If you're a hosting company for these people, cancel their contracts and remove their websites. "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone." Let's pull the plug. It has to be done honestly and openly, but let's pull the plug.

  168. Nameservers? No clue... by mirabilos · · Score: 1

    I didn't grep the posts for this, but why not
    just using the alternate nameserver space?
    PacificRoot, e.g., provides these:
    -- /etc/resolv.conf
    lookup file bind
    nameserver 208.179.42.162
    nameserver 204.107.129.2
    -- end-of-snippet

    Please don't mod me redundant. Many people browse with "newest first". Thanks.

    --
    My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
    1. Re:Nameservers? No clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My schools DNS server is 165.95.31.1
      My ISPs DNS server is 204.177.232.9

      They are on different backbones, so at least one of them should be usable for someone..

      Do a tracert -d to each and find the closest one..

  169. Re: stealing service by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1

    it would appear that 4.2.2.4 is the router. that would make more sense. steal service, as in, bandwidth. not stealing service from dns. if they were concerned with that, they might as well turn those into local domain only servers and use something else as a private nameserver with access control.

  170. lites on nobody @home by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    For me, AT&T user, I'm doa in Dallas. Unfortunately this type of thing is stupid especially considering how much I get charged per month for this service. Maybe I'll be *patient* and let AT&T fumble around. Frankly, AT&T should have provided us at least with access to their crappy worldnet service instead of letting me hack onto netzero and aol for a temporary work-around.

    Uhhhh Let's see 1.5 million subscribers, we'll just leave them hanging on....

    Frankly, I'm looking into DSL options now, so I probably won't be using AT&T in the future. But hey it's only my internet connectivity, no big deal right?

    But do we all buy Excite's line that they were loosing $6m/week? Unfortuantely for me at the rates we have to pay for this, Let's see at least from AT&T's subscribers that should be $75m/gross/month. Maybe AT&T was taking too much off the top? But still that's a hunk of change.

    Egads *I've got Mail* - Save me!

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  171. Re:I'm back online, too by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
    On our part of the ATT Cable network (Portland OR), all DNS pointed to the switch page. I had connectivety, but could only browse the page on how to switch over to the new system. (I still had an Excite IP, and external computers were able to get into my system for Web, FTP, TS, Mail, Etc...) I think the changeover was exceedingly smooth. They left a good window where both services were running concurently. Who could ask for more?

    It seems you were one of the lucky ones...For me, the plug was just pulled. No transition, no nothing. Excite's little way of striking at AT&T, but also screwing the customers of AT&T and generally leaving a bad taste in our mouths.
    --
    Who did what now?
  172. Seattle's back online. by berniecase · · Score: 1

    DHCP set up on my Linux box (running NAT for a few other computers), and we're off and running (finally). I'm not entirely pleased that AT&T is capping customers off at 1.5Mbps, but I'll live. Anything's better than 56k.

  173. @Home mail servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been sending lots of small emails to my @home.com email address & during the last cuple of weeks I've noted some serious issues with their core mail servers. At one point (Friday a week ago?) all of their mail relays were unavailable, with the 65.x.x.x servers off the net and the 24.x.x.x servers refusing connections. The situation resolved in an hour or two -- well at least on server came up & I was able to push my email through...

    Then just the other day their email servers started refusing email from IBM's US domain, claiming they couldn't resolve it.

    I guess the point of this posting is to illustrate that this instability appears to be affecting all @home customers instead of the ones facing lost local services (DNS, connectivity). The core services are becoming less reliable as well, which is definitely a reason for concern...

  174. From the newspeak dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is from AT&T's blurb describing how they are going to cap what had prevously been faster download speeds. "Additionally, your AT&T Broadband Internet connection has been
    optimized for all users through a maximum network setting of
    1.5Mbps downstream. This speed setting is part of our
    continuous effort to provide you with the fastest, most
    consistent broadband service at the lowest possible price"

  175. Dial up. Your "clever" insights by bstadil · · Score: 1

    Your "clever" insight has been mentioned approx 10 times so far.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  176. we don't make enough to care about you by bstadil · · Score: 1

    we don't make enough to care about you
    With this attitude you will never make nor amount to anything, Period. Think about this next time you go to McDonalds or any restaurant. If the service is bad just Enjoy it, and think "Well, that only because they do not make enough" but neither do I so lets all just live with this

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:we don't make enough to care about you by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 2

      So for CDN 12/hr you want me to jump for fucking joy at your existence. Are you jumping for mine? I used to care, and burnt out, because in the end, everything is taken for granted. You can spend 5 min or 45 min with a call. And they're back the next day wanting more. More of what I don't have. Asking for things we don't have, things I cannot do, things not part of our support. And when you can't do anymore, they whip out their little get-outta-jail-free card, and bitch about the service.

      Whatever you do for a living, I'm sure that a lowly peon like me doesnt register on the radar of someone as distinguished as yourself. I get ignored and treated like shit most places I go (retailers, restaurants, etc,) because I'm not dressed in designer black leather, holding a $10 cup of coffee I bought with my Visa Gold. I'm difficult to ignore too, as I'm 6ft 2, skinny 160lbs and bald as a cue ball with a friggin big nose. So don't give me that suburban father attitude about MY poor attitude. I've bent over backwards for people like you for a long time, and your kind just keeps treating us like shit. You're just the kind of self-important asshole that goes out of his way to make the small people feel smaller. And calls back the next day expecting "superior service".

      Like I said, you get what you pay for. You want superior service, pay for it. $40/month doesn't get you a CCNA OK? Hell, if I had my CCNA, I wouldn't be needing to do tech support.

  177. AT&T bandwidth shaping is tuned for surfing by buck68 · · Score: 0

    I live in the Portland, Oregon area. As others have noted, the transition had some hiccups with DNS in the first few hours, but since then it seems OK.

    I decided to do a little bit throughput checking with the new setup.

    Prior to the transition, I was able to to consistently achieve 3.5-4Mbps downstream speed (using a traffic generator from the place that I work). For about a year now, I have had a 128kbps upstream cap.

    Post transition, I see that there is a 1.5Mbps downstream shaper in place. My measurements indicate that this shaper is configured to allocate the 1.5Mbps in 1 second chunks. It is possible to burst to as high as 3.5-4Mbps (I surmise this is the link limit speed imposed on the coax side of cable modem), but the rate drops off a cliff to zero as soon as the 1.5Mbps quota is reached. The overall rate curve for continuous traffic looks like roughly like a square wave.

    This has suboptimal interactions with long-lived TCP connections, like file download via ftp or http. The most they will achieve, by my measurements, is about 1.2-1.3 Mbps. This suboptimality is due to the interaction between TCP's congestion control and the shaper (the cliff causes TCP to experience multiple timeouts).

    I discussed this setup with a colleague at school, specifically why they would choose such a coarse grained shaper (1s period). We concluded that it favors short bursty traffic, i.e. normal web surfing. Since the average http request is less than 1.5Mb (~180KB), the speed should "feel" more like the 3-4Mbps link rate, even though the maximum average is the 1.5Mbps limit. So, surfing should feel upto 200% faster than the shaper limit, while long-lived TCP connections take about a 20-35% hit.

    In summary, their setup favors web surfing over downloads and streaming.

    1. Re:AT&T bandwidth shaping is tuned for surfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this comment _WAY_ up!!!

    2. Re:AT&T bandwidth shaping is tuned for surfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "bandwidth shaping" as one would normally think of it. Cable modem networks work on time division multiplexing. You get a set chunk of time to move data and so does everyone else. The amount your modem is allowed to talk is how they control the speed.

    3. Re:AT&T bandwidth shaping is tuned for surfing by buck68 · · Score: 0

      I think you are wrong.

      I can sustain super smooth 1.5Mbps with UDP, very low jitter, distributed evenly. Or I can burst at 4Mbps and see a complete deaad zone for over 500ms. That is shaper, not TDMA. If it was TDMA as you surmise, the dead zone would occur regardless of whether I did a burst.

      I don't claim cable modems don't do TDMA. I know they do. The DOSCIS protocol is basically IP over syncrhonous MPEG-2 TS, but the TDMA period is much more fine grained than 1s.

  178. Re: Canadian @Home by halo8 · · Score: 1

    nntp.flfrd.phub.net.cable.rogers.com

    replace the .flfrd. with .toronto. or whatever

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  179. AT&T@home ala AT&T Worldnet by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Just wondering if anyone has figured out if AT&T will finally converge their broadband internet with the WorldNet dial-up.

    I've had their WorldNet dial-up service for years now. Mainly because I do not want to migrate email addies...and I haven't used it much in years since having a braodband connection. I'd love to have a single account though.

    Any insights or thoughts on this?

  180. Interesting Tech info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did a little playing around and this is what I came up with.

    Using Ethereal and Langaurd I found out this info:
    First I used langaurd to scan my ip range 24.x.x.1-254

    Found several replies, so that means some people have their computer on. I was able to ping anything that was 24.x.x.x including DNS and other 24.x servers.

    So then I launched ethereal and did a dhcp request. I was offered a 10.x.x.x ip but for some reason the computer did not accept it and timed outSo I picked apart the packet and plugged in the settings into my IP configuration.

    I then launched langaurd again and found about 100 10.x.x.x IPs with an open port 80. I pulled up the IP in my browser and it said "RCA DOCSIS DIAGNOSTICS" MAC ADDRESS xxxxxxx IP address XX
    CABLE MODEM READY. ONLINE. blah blah.. Rather interesting. I tried pinging the 24.x ips and they pinged. I tried to ping the 4.2.2.1 name server for verizon and it didn't ping. I tried again on my original IP and same thing. I tried pinging the Unix server by IP at my college.. Same thing.. no reply.

    So I decided to unplug my cable modem and reset it. I plugged it back in and its just flashing like it gets no connection.Doh.. Here's the text of the packet:

    Bootstrap Ptotocol
    Message type: Boot Reply (2)
    Hardware type: Ethernet
    Hardware address lenght: 6
    Hops :0
    Transaction ID: 0xfffffa62
    Seconds Elapsed: 0
    Broadcast flag: 0x8000
    Client IP address: (0.0.0.0)
    Your (client) IP address: 10.x.x.x (10.x.x.x)
    Next server IP address: lh1.svc1.tx.home.com (24.14.77.10)
    Relay agent IP address: 10.85.19.1 (10.85.19.1)
    Client hardware address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (omitted)
    Server host name not given
    Boot file name: /boot/alntn1_c2_msb-2100_v1_n11.mcns
    Magic cookie: (OK)
    Option 53: DHCP Message Type = DHCP Offer
    Option 1: Subnet Mask = 255.255.255.0
    Option 2: Time offset (4 bytes)
    Option 3: Router = 10.85.19.1
    Option 4: Time Server = 24.14.77.10
    Option 51: IP Address Lease Time = 6 days42 minutes, 27 seconds
    Option 54: Server Identifier = 24.14.77.12
    Unknown Option Code: 128 (4 bytes)
    End Option
    Padding

    It is followed by a DHCP ACK and then Windows 2000 guesses an ip of 169.x.x.x.

    DON'T UNPLUG YOUR CABLE MODEM! You will loose its limited connectivity.

    1. Re:Interesting Tech info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 10.x.x.x is the int service network. It's designed NOT to be able to be reached externally.

  181. Re:AT&T fully functional in Portland, but a bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Yeah here in Vancouver, WA (SW Wash.) never any problems. Saturday morning I noticed that we are now going through the attbi network instead of @home's. Had to change everything to DHCP. The internet seems a bit slower but we'll see what happens. The change of e-mail address does suck, though.

  182. Re: other affiliates by theoriginalturtle · · Score: 1

    I'm on a smaller non-ATT @Home affiliate in Maryland, and we're fine here. I grilled the cable losers last week as to their contingency plans, and while they indicated they had one, I was pretty sure they really didn't. Something they pointed out is that they as a cable provider deal with an entity called @Home Solutions, as opposed to subbing off Excite@Home.

    Our original provider here was Kiva Networks, but they apparently chose to pull out of the area after helping the local company get the system up and running, but they were far superior to @Home, particularly in tech support. Among their last useful acts was to ensure that I got static IP (yay) when they did the conversion to the @Home address space.

    Somebody mentioned the "go fill out a web support request form" when your service is down... nothing said "loser" about @Home's support more clearly than the fact that unless you are actually at a workstation in @Home's address space, you can't even visit excite.home.com, where supposedly all the subscriber-specific information is. Thus, if the cable is forked up, I can't go to work and look up reasons why. Dildos.

    Turtle

    --
    ---------------------------------------
    Rotate the pod, please, HAL....
  183. This whole fiasco is kinda fun... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Yesterday I got a letter from Cox (for Cox@Home) stating they were raising my bill by $5.00 - normally, I wouldn't have cared - I know what they are providing, they don't hassle me too much about attempting to stay "static" (IP wise) while they "roll out" DHCP (hey, for some reason my FreeSCO hangs when set to use DHCP - it boots, and sits waiting for some DHCP message it never gets - anybody else run FreeSCO and know about this?). But during the wait to see if I would be dropped, it was kinda hilarious.

    Friday, I took precautions - I first pinged and got every "important" IP for sites I visit a lot (mostly /. and Fark, with a few other odd ducks thrown in), in prep for editing a hosts file. Then, I set up DNS caching on my FreeSCO box (I should have done this long ago), a visited a lot of other sites. Then, I posted pleas on a couple of message lists I am on for DNS servers, and got responses. Then I waited...

    Well, everything still seems good - but that could be my DNS cache - let me google a funky site now...

    Seems OK - googled for "harpoon fish", hit a site called "asianartresource" in Hong Kong - loaded up fine (hell, faster than some local online stores).

    I am on Cox@Home, as I noted before - so, things are OK here in Phoenix, as of 1:00pm AZ time Sunday.

    As a "just-in-case" - anyone know if it is possible to "hand modify" FreeSCO's init files to have it point to more than two DNS servers (so I can type in these extra ones posted everywhere, as a just in case)?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  184. Re:Off Topic, but Important: Ginger/IT To Be Revea by zhensel · · Score: 2

    Judging by the shear number of Ginger-related posts on slashdot during the time of the leak, I definitely have to think that something is afoot. This is just way too obvious of a slashdot type story.

  185. Less Painfull Than Expected by CrabCakeJimmy2k · · Score: 1

    Yesterday My connection light on my cable modem to AT&T was flashing. This morning it was not.

    I simply disconnected one of my machines from my switch/router and connected it to the cable modem, turned on DHCP, Ipconfig /all in a CMD window, Mark & paste, then hooked everything back up normally. Reset the machines network settings to where they once were and entered the copied info into the router. Bango back on-line.

    Too easy. I expected it to take longer for them to transition me, so I am not really disapointed. AT&T has been really reliable (except for once when a car took out a pole down the street, But still they were back up as quickly as they could be). I have had so much more downtime with Qwest (pathetic POS).

    I have 5 machines being served by the connection. One for me, One for my Girl, one for the Kids, One for the Entertainment Center and The PDC/File-Print server.

  186. Comcast Jumpstart - Comcast's @Home Replacement? by instinctdesign · · Score: 1

    I actually just had a chat with a Comcast rep at a local technology show and it looks like that if your running Comcast@Home you might be in for a significantly better ride than the other providers have partnered with.

    Comcast has been working on their own broadband cable network for a bit of time now, partly anticipating the demise of @Home as well as the issues rising out of the severe limitations that @Home put on commercial deals that Comcast wanted to pursue. Originally planned to launch in April 2002, the Comcast network, currently codenamed 'JumpStart', has been pushed forward to a potential launch January 1st 2002, assuming everything goes well. Due to the accelerated timetable there may be glitches in the initial rollout, but frankly intermittently buggy cable (assuming it will be fixed in the near future) is better than dialup in my opinion.

    You will however lose your @Home email account as well as any stored messages or address book so back them up as soon as possible. Comcast will provide email services once their network is up and running. What the final name of the program I can't attest to, jumpstart.net .org and .com all seem to be taken, so its hard to say what your email address could end up being.

    Obviously this is all from one source, though a Comcast representative, its best to avoid taking all this to heart until there is a final formal announcement as to their plans. I do know that Comcast@Home is up and running as of mid-day today. For how long... who is to say.

    --
    forma3
  187. False advertising by Animats · · Score: 2
    The heading says "No Upfront Fee". But the body copy says "At Home customers who switch to Covad DSL are eligible for a $225 rebate on the DSL self-install kit with modem, which makes installation cost free after the rebate." That's called "bait and switch" false advertising.

    If you ask for this deal, and they want money up front, contact the California State Attorney General and file a false advertising complaint.

  188. 4 or 5 hours come on now by budgenator · · Score: 2

    Get serious dude, I remember driving from Graffenwhor to Mesau in 2 and a half hours doing 90 MPH in an army van and the BMW would pass us as streaks! 4 or 5 hours to cross an european country if your only on a moped.

    Europe is much more planned than US or CA you can literaly fly into a major city, walk to the bus stop, go to the train station, jump on a bus to almost anywhere. Usualy you can do it all on one ticket.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  189. Comcast@HOME NJ...Up sortof...No DNS by FKell · · Score: 1

    Well, like I said before, I work up today and now the DNS server I was using yesturday no longer works. Again, luckily I plugged in 4 new DNS servers and now I am fine again. I am really thinking of loading up BIND 8, the only problem is that this is my laptop, and to be honest, it will use more resourses then I have to spare right now (until I get another 128 megs of RAM)... Anyway, I have still recieved NO OFFICIAL contact from Comcast at ALL. You would think they would send me a mail message or even post a message over thier Digital Cable TV service (it supports a messaging system almost like email).

  190. Optus@home by The_Myth · · Score: 2

    I'm on the Australian Optus @ Home and they just recently (two weeks ago) bought the Australian interest away from Excite. No down time at all.

    --
    The MyTh - I am a figment of the Imagination - [Im Probably even not here]
  191. if you have IP, but no DNS, DO NOT DO THIS! by MoNsTeR · · Score: 2

    I live in Denver, CO.
    The first time I tried to use the net saturday, I determined that I still had IP connectivity (I could ping the gateway, at the least), but no DNS, as many others have reported. After spending an embarrassingly small amount of time trying to work around that, I rebooted the modem.

    that = BIG MISTAKE

    Because now the modem is stuck in an endless cycle of trying to get back on the network, (ie: "online" light never goes solid). dhclient successfully(?) retrieves the addy 192.168.100.11, which is what it does when the real DHCP servers aren't responding. It's been doing that since saturday, no change.

    Right now I'm on campus downloading the NetZero installer :(

  192. c:\hosts.??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What extention does the host file need?

    1. Re:c:\hosts.??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      %windir%\hosts for win9x/me
      %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts for NT/2K/XP
      /etc/hosts for *NIX

  193. Why it's cheaper in Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am on shaw@home network on vancouver island and the only problem I've had is having to change my e-mail addy to a @shaw.ca one.

    Internet connectivity is generaly cheaper in canada beacuse it is considered an essential service like a phone line, and as such you can not charge more then $50 bucks a month for an essential basic package. A cable modem is considerd a basic package internet service, so it can not cost people more then $50 a month and simmler bandwidth is of course is resonable cheap 'cus of forced priceing.

  194. @home in Georgia by robot+prom · · Score: 1

    i'm on Charter @home. It went down Sat. morning about 5AM, came back up around 3PM. I got a new IP, but can still access the www/ which takes me to home.excite.com, and my @home email accounts. I can't access news though, even though I can ping it and it's there.

    Speed wise, I'm peaking at about 20KB DL and 10KB UL. it's super slow compared to what it was a couple of days ago.

  195. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell can you be impressed by the fact that AT&T is monopolizing over high speed internet service which will eventually lead to the death of other high speed internet providers and causing the price of your connection to sky rocket but you'll deal with it because you aren't going to go back to a modem. Why you are even impressed with what should be a simple process, I have no clue. @Home is bad enough to begin with, but now you are being forced, and charged during I might add, to have a internet outage because AT&T wants every ISP to go with their lines. That is the only reason this is happening. Of the 50 you pay for internet, about 12 is for the internet, the rest is for the lines. Now if AT&T ownes all the lines then they can offer out to all the ISPs the ability to host different users, but using AT&T's lines, which will eventually lead to a huge monopoly. And if every ISP uses AT&T's lines then AT&T can charge whatever the hell they want so you, the customer, gets screwed over. I personally have DSL and have had not a single outage in the past 3 1/2 years. Plus with my line I get a private connection to the internet, compared to yours which is split amongst hundreds of users, not only causing you to have a speed loss but creating huge security vulnerabilities. This should be the final straw of why you can even stand to use @Home, but instead you are impressed by their ability to clean up after their fuckups.

  196. Not all cable companies use proprietary crap. by J.C.B. · · Score: 2
    An example, Cable One of Phoenix Arizona. On their support site, they have a page with all the information that you'll need to set up your connection if you use an unsupported operating system. There's nothing proprietary about it.


    On the other hand certain ADSL plans here require you to run a windows program just to connect to the service. I wouldn't go making blanket statements that only go with cable if it's your only option for broadband, because many times, cable is the better choice.

  197. Wicker Park/Bucktown... by dgulbran · · Score: 1

    What really sucks is that I just moved to Chicago in May, and the area where I am was served by Prime Cable/ExpressNet... talk about shitty service! It was *horrible*... I once had one of their *customer services* representatives tell me on the phone "Well, it's going to be down as long as it's down. Maybe you should just get another provider." Of course, thanks to protected cable monopolies I *couldn't* (RCN doesn't offer modems here for some reason).

    Well, along came ATT, bought out Prime, and then my cable modem rocked, although my cable channel line-up still bites donkey dongs (no Food Network???). Now, I come home yesterday to nada... zip... and this 7-10 days B.S. when ATT **KNEW** this was coming is a joke. I'm really beginning to hate my decision to move to this city...

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
    1. Re:Wicker Park/Bucktown... by jennygerbi · · Score: 1


      If you're in Chicago proper, and aren't going to move for a year or two, there are some very good DSL companies around that I"ve been looking at- got some of the ideas from /., actually. Go to www.dslreports.com. The only reason I'm not DSL is that I'm moving in less than a year, and would have to pay $$$$ to get out of the contract. Earthlink, while not the highest rated, has quite a good deal going right now- one year contract, no fees for setup or equipment (!!) 49/month. Better than cable. If I could, I'd go DSL. -Jenny

      p.s. I have the food network on my ATT cable. That doesn't make that much sense with you..?

  198. can't believe it by p4r4d0x · · Score: 2

    Is there any precedent for something like this? I can't believe it's actually happened...in any case, I'm exceedingly pissed off that my email account has been disabled and my emails bouncing. What a nightmare for people everywhere (sysadmins of mailinglists, etc.)...

    1. Re:can't believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing it was going to happen in advance, shouldn't you have proactively moved to a free provider (myrealbox,mail.com,hotmail,yahoo). It's not like we didn't know this was coming....it's not like the cable companies didn't know it was coming.

  199. problem with using machines behind a NAT box by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    I'm using (well, WAS using) a Linksys Cable/DSL Router (with NAT). Unfortunately, my machine couldn't use DNS when behind the Linksys NAT, so I've had to (hopefully _temporarily_) go back to being hooked up directly. Very strange, and the people at AT&T broadband customer service didn't know of a fix - they said it'll hopefully be fixed, but they'd not heard of the problem.

    1. Re:problem with using machines behind a NAT box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same Linksys Cable/DSL Router (with NAT) and I have a connection. One thing that you have to do is type in the DNS servers directly into the TCP/IP settings of your Operating System. Typing them into just the router doesn't work. Everything else works fine.

  200. They undercharged (Excite) by eclectric · · Score: 1

    Plain and simple, they thought they could make up in volume, or something. They needed to charge a lot more (I think they were getting $14 per subscriber, or something idiotically small like that).

    $40 a month for the kind of bandwidth most of us use on our cable modem is insanely low, and I don't how much more I can afford to pay for it, but it's been a nice ride.

    1. Re:They undercharged (Excite) by Virtucon · · Score: 1



      Well $14 * 4 Million = $56m/mo. Which isn't
      chump change, yes there's overhead and
      service but that's the AT&T end of the bargain.

      I presume that when AT&T went into the agreement
      that they'd lowball @home, however AT&T probably had it up their sleeves that they'd be able to shove them out. Still at $56m/mo. you can build quite an ISP. AOL has what 32m subscribers at what is it $20/crack ( i don't know since I'm using their free crappola now, and it sucks.)

      So AOL is grossing just on ISP $640m/mo. Not too
      shabby. Besides I can get better service from
      local shop ISPs like WT.NET for $10/mo which is far
      better and faster than AOL, so I don't see how price directly affects performance and quality. I think it's a "Market will bear" situation here and somebody put the price point at $50/mo, at least that's what it is locally. DSL is $50/mo regardless of who you sign up with. So, seems a bit anti-competitive like the oil business I guess. However considering the Cable is already
      in the ground or on the poles as it were, the ongoing costs should be distributed evenly. However Network Hub equipment etc. can be expensive, but again $75m/mo would be an attractive market for 1.5m at&t subscribers. Now with 4.1m @home subscribers that comes out to $205m/mo or $2.46b/year. That any vulture capitalist would drool over.

      All this for a pretty "*free*" internet don't you think. if @home were getting screwed they should have had better lawyers. anyway I also agree that the pittance for the network $400m that AT&T offered was terrible. But then again If AT&T moved their customers over back for less, then they made money.

      BTW, I'm now an @ATTBI.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:They undercharged (Excite) by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      all excite payed for was the e-mail and web site traffic and storage ..
      the local cable companies pay for the BW ..

      (which is why my office in comcast's White Marsh building was sitting over an oc-48 switch)

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  201. Good news by utdpenguin · · Score: 0
    Dallas Texas:


    I was knocked off but am now back on. Appear to be on ATT's new netwrok as my IP has chnaged and have no hostname associated. :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
  202. seattle's been up since aprox 0930 by tnlratofwa · · Score: 1

    mdoem was connecting when i woke up this morning. took less than i thought would! way to attbi ;)!

  203. AT&T Service Review by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1

    Just a quick note here. I've put in two calls to AT&T since this began. The first one Saturday morning, the second one this morning. I was very impressed with the courtesy with which I was treated. The lady I spoke with the first day, whose name I cannot recall (unfortunately) was obviously frazzled and had already had to deal with several irate customers. Yet she still did her best to provide me with information and was very courteous. More than that, I didn't have to wait hardly at all to get a response. Less than 10 minutes on the morning of the event. Not bad at all. She was a bit skewed on details, (i.e. maintained that linux was not going to be a "supported" platform. In her mind that meant I wouldn't be able to connect. But that's easily forgiven)

    Today, Jennifer was also helpfull. She gave what info she could, and was very straight with me on how things were going. I'm sure it had been a long day for her as well yet she still was extremely courteous.

    So, on that side I'm very happy. And if they hold to their estimate as it was given to me, and have everyone up in the next 7 to 10 days I think most everyone will be happy. And the more of us who reconfigure stuff ourself the faster it'll go.

    However, on the downside, their AUP and TOU still really sucks. While it's been awhile since I last read it, I think it's even gotten WORSE if that can be believed. There's some really ridiculous stuff in there. And of course, there's the whole "limiting downstream speeds" thing. So they can offer tiered service later. Woo! Now I can pay more for the same level of service! What fun!

    --
    "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
    --James Madison
  204. Not So Lucky Here by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    Some crap seems to go on.

    Even though I'm in Oregon that is supposedly transferred, I'm out of luck.

    The problem is that I used to have a static IP on my UNIX box. All the automatic updates were for DHCP'd Windoze (this is why their instruction starts with "reboot"). I was not able to find an instruction for what I should do, so I think about saying "Fuck it!" and going back to friendly local provider with a 56K since I live too far from CO for DSL :-(.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Not So Lucky Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your unix box not support DHCP. My Debian box and BeOS box both got the DHCP from AT&T without a problem. (without the restart needed for doze)

      I'm very impressed with how fast the network switch is going. Considering the size of the network, having it pretty much up in 7 days is pretty impressive. I was up in under 12 hours!!!

  205. ATTBI Throttled by shanman · · Score: 1

    I'm finally back up after 2 days of downtime. But, I am displeased that my bandwidth is now artificially throttled to 1.5M down :(

  206. Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is flamebait?

    Whoever moderated this guy down wouldn't know the difference if flamebait ran him over with a back hoe.

  207. Sorry you feel that way by bstadil · · Score: 1

    Maybe you do have a point. The problem is that the people that in your eyes Bitch do have a point as well. The best remedy is obviously to take our business elsewhere after politely letting the company know, but in a quasi monopoly situation like Cable access this is not always doable. Anyway, best regards and Peace

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  208. Linux solves it once again by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    I've lived with a 512kbit cable modem in the uk for some time, and having a few months of ATT@Home i'm quite pissed that it's no longer working.

    However i suggest you set up 'tc' on linux to shape the traffic on your linux system. I'm certainly no genius on this subject but if you have linux throttle incoming bandwidth at 1480kbit then you should be able to ensure that you constantly sit just below the limit for any given second.

    My main use for tc is to shift large files from my us cable modem to my uk cable modem. I'm had it set to limit my outbound usage to my UK ip address to 112kbit, but set that traffic to be of very low priority - the net effect is that i can upload data all day long. The remaining 16kbit of outbound bandwidth is enough to leave room for all the other tcp control packets (keeps downloads fast) and whenever i upload anything else it takes priority over my bulk upload.

    neat eh?

  209. Help -- can't use ICS with new ATTBI service by pissedinCO · · Score: 1

    We have been successfully using Internet Connection Sharing with the @Home service for awhile. However, with the new changeover to ATTBI we can't get it to work anymore. Does anyone have any info on this? Thanks!