Slashdot Mirror


The Price Of Doing Business

8127972 writes: "It seems that a ton of high tech companies are leaving cities (like San Fran) with high costs of doing business for cheaper cities (Washington DC is mentioned due to new government spending) or even cities in Canada. Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot."

768 comments

  1. Move to Oklahoma!!! by TurboRoot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The cost of living here is SUPER low.. plus.. you can hire VBscript monkies to work on ASP sites for $8/hour.

    In Oklahoma, you put an add in the paper, and you will have billions of applications and you can pick who ever is willing to take the least amount of pay.

    That is why companies like AOL like to put call centers in Oklahoma cause they can pay a whole $9/hour and people shit themselves about how much money it is. :)

    Unfortuantly, actually SELLING a product in Oklahoma is kind of bleak.. but if your product is nation wide.. then this is the place.

    1. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Amarok.Org · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work for a company who did just that... transfered me from San Jose to OKC to work in a call center. That company (and it's call center) is still there. They've systematically eliminated most of the original CA transplants (and their associated CA salaries) after getting local "monkies" (as you call them) trained to do the work at less than half the cost.

      Oklahoma (and similar states) also tend to offer HUGE tax incentives to companies like AOL to open call centers, since it creates lots of jobs for the local populous that would not have otherwise exist.

      Luckily, I escaped the hell that is Oklahoma, and am now living in the hell that is Texas. *grin*

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    2. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess your grin acknowledges it, but I'd like to point out that Texas is a whole other kind of hell, and it's a lot hotter too.

    3. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's less expensive, and thanks to a higher unemployement rate you won't have to work as hard to recruit people, it's still not anywhere as nice as San Fran. When the job market heats up again, people will move to where they want to live. It's just a cycle and this is about 15 years into the current one.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by the_mongo · · Score: 1

      That's why Texas has good cold beer and nice looking ladies to compensate. Plus the whole no state income tax thing makes CA not look all that grand.

    5. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by TurboRoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Haha, I so know what you are talking about. Most of my friends, family, and ex-girlfriends have all escaped to Texas!

      The few of us left here in Oklahoma, we refer to ourselves as "refuges", are too lazy to get off our asses and actually move to a state where we can get paid well.

      But! the advantage is, I don't really have to work hard and get a ton of free time. Plus, my true love besides computers is cars (hence my nick of TurboRoot). In Oklahoma, we have no vehicle inspections anymore. That means you can take all that emission crap off your car (all the polution blows northwest and ends up in Denver) and you can't get in trouble. The only restriction is that your car isn't too loud. Other then that, modify your vehicle at will.

      Of course, don't forget the joke "Why is Oklahoma so windy? Because Kansas blows and Texas sucks."

    6. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by yomahz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cost of living here is SUPER low..

      As someone who spent the first 21 years of his life there (OKC), I can tell you that there is a reason for that. I think anyone would be crazy to move there seeing that all I ever wanted to do was get out.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    7. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      yeh, but the aftermath of a Bush clan executive has destroyed teh infrastructure, tax base and school system there.

      add to it the terrible pollution problem...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    8. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      A few hours drive south of Oklahoma is Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, a big Metropolitan area... #8 or 9 in the US in terms of population. Living in Oklahoma is not really that bad.

    9. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by aengblom · · Score: 1

      Dear Slashdot,

      Drop the large ads and wierd payment system and just move to Oklahoma!

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    10. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by dumpster_d · · Score: 1

      I visited Texas and found my equivalent house listing there for 45K$ [29% of its cost here]--I can see why companies don't need to pay their employees. Everything from gas to dinner was about 1/2 - 2/3 of the price out here . . . and the people were a heck of a lot more pleasant.

      That 9$/hr is probably worth about 50k$ out here.

      If resources aren't a restriction, I wonder why do business in cost-prohibitive places like SF/PDX/Seattle at all?

    11. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by wilhelm · · Score: 1

      Or the other joke: Why doesn't Texas fall into the Gulf of Mexico? Because Oklahoma sucks... :)

    12. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yeh, but the aftermath of a Bush clan executive has destroyed teh infrastructure, tax base and school system there.

      add to it the terrible pollution problem...


      Again, the ignorance shown with that statement is astounding. There is no "destroyed infrastructure," no problem with the "tax base," and very little wrong with the schools in general. The pollution problem is largely confined to one semi-coastal city.

      As to the tax statement, Texas is one of fewer than ten states that have a currently balanced budget despite the recession, and Texas itself has yet to enter a true recession.

      Also, the Governor of Texas has very little power compared to the Lt. Governor by Constitutional design (Texans being suspicious of government historically). In a power ranking of state governors, the Texas Governor would rank 49th out of 50 with number 1 having the most power. This would leave any Governor of Texas little leeway to destroy anything, whether or not he/she had a "clan."

      Check your facts and reduce your ignorance. Or is that just your political bias showing through? (note that I did not endorse the former governor, I merely refuted your erroneous statements)

    13. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. The governor office in Texas is a mainly figurehead position with very little authority. The distrusting constitution writers wanted very little centralized authority. That's why the power exists mainly in the congress which only meets every other year.

      The school system was shit long before Bush took office.

    14. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      Haha! That is actually pretty funny.

      The version I herd was..

      Why doesn't Texas fall into the Gulf of Mexico? Because the Gulf of Mexico would not be able to afford the property tax.

    15. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pollution!? Shee-yit! You must be one o'those damn Yankee furriners I hear tell about!

      That there pollution is just ev-oh-loo-shun in action! It only kills off the weak alveoli (I watch the Discovery channel -- I know lots o'them big words)! Down here in God's Country we don't hold to pampering the cells in our bodies! Only the strong survive! The weak die in the summer! Remember the Alamo! Go and buy some more guns! Yee-hah!

      (To hopefully deterr some flames: I am a native Dallasite who owns lots of guns. This post is sarcastic).

    16. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by PD · · Score: 2

      Austin isn't like that though. My house is 2200 square feet and for what I paid for it, I could have afforded 5000 square feet in Michigan.

    17. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      . . . and the people were a heck of a lot more pleasant.

      Yeah, I went to Minneapolis/San Jose/New York and said to a gas station clerk, "Can I please have a pack of [brand of cigarettes]?". They all laughed becuase I said "please".

    18. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Just make sure it's in an area where you would feel safe walking through at night. Slums are not merely limited to LA and New York.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    19. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      If you consider the Metroplex (DFW) as one unit (for those of you who haven't been here, we're talking abot an area that is at least 1,200 square miles of connected cities), you're looking at more than 5 million people. DFW considered as a whole (and not individual cities) is probably #2 or #3 in population size.

    20. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.... Kansas is way windier than Oklahoma.... why doesn't Texas fall into the Gulf of Mexico? Because Oklahoma sucks.

    21. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by PeteEMT · · Score: 1

      I thought the real reason for positioning call centers in the Plain States (Oklohama, Kansas) was because it was very close to the geographical center of the US. Allowing for the shortest distance to any location in the lower 48 (short leased lines?). I once read the Airlines have their reservation centers positioned for just this reason.

      --
      Pete
    22. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by ZipperHead99 · · Score: 0

      I find it odd, that all these states (and Countries) are doing these things to help their local economies. But if you look at the raw numbers, its really just help the corporations, not the little guys that are receiving the bennefits.

    23. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by thogard · · Score: 1

      There is a backup center near the Tulsa airport.

      Geographicly the center of the US would be the major hub of your preferred airline. Getting from a minor city like Tulsa to another minor city may require two plane changes where you can from from Atlanta to just about any minor city direct.

    24. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you consider the Metroplex (DFW) as one unit (for those of you who haven't been here, we're talking abot an area that is at least 1,200 square miles of connected cities), you're looking at more than 5 million people. DFW considered as a whole (and not individual cities) is probably #2 or #3 in population size.


      I'm not sure where you're getting your figures but the 2000 census indicates that the "DWF" area has only about 3,480,663 people.

      Collin: 491,675
      Denton: 432,976
      Dallas: 2,218,899
      Ellis: 111,360
      Kaufman: 71,313
      Rockwall: 43,080

      Compare that with the 9,519,338 people in Los Angeles County alone and it looks like a long race for 7th or 8th. Add in all the other counties that make up LA (Orange, Ventura, Riverside, etc., etc.) and you're looking more like 15th or 16th.

      Travel more, it'll do you good.

      Sources:

      http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?ds_n ame=DEC_2000_SF1_U&geo_id=04000US06&_box_head_nbr= GCT-PH1&format=ST-2

      http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?ds_n ame=DEC_2000_SF1_U&geo_id=04000US48&_box_head_nbr= GCT-PH1&format=ST-2

    25. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 1

      Here it is.

      Population 5,221,801. I think the fact that you left out Tarrant county might have skewed your numbers.

      DFW is at #9 for metro areas sizes. (See, I can even admit when I'm wrong). But it has a growth of over 29% -- more than twice as high as any area in the top eight.

      Now go and troll someone else.

    26. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1
      Sure .. and then you're *stuck* there if the company restructures or eliminates your job. Sucks to transfer .. sucks more to have to leave again just to find employment. Been there, done that.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    27. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by haystor · · Score: 1

      Guy goes to the doctor.

      Doctor says, "you've got 6 months to live. I advise you move to Oklahoma and marry one of the local women."

      Guy says, "Will that help me live longer?"

      Doctor says, "No, but it will seem like it."

      --
      t
    28. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

      It is not necessary to leave the entire state. Just get the heck out of the big cities or expensive counties. Rent or build a large office near a major highway in the suburbs where there are hotels nearby. I know the big attraction for cities was because that's were it all happened. But it hasn't been necessary to be in the heart of a large city for about 10 years.

      I hate commuting into large cities the traffic is unbelievable and it's entirely unnecessary. Plus you don't need to layoff your workforce and re-hire just stay somewhat nearby and folks will go the distance. I happen to like the high rate of pay and average cost of living. I don't want to make $8.00 in Oklahoma when I can may $40 an hour on the east coast!

  2. Going, going, GONE!! by nege · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear there is some cheap real estate in Kabul...

    1. Re:Going, going, GONE!! by csbruce · · Score: 1

      I hear there is some cheap real estate in Kabul...

      Might be a fixer-upper, though.

  3. aboot by HCase · · Score: 0

    those moving to canada will also need to learn to say aboot fairly often.

    1. Re:aboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd like to see you say "what's that aboot?" to any Canadian. They'll promptly answer.. no, you fucking retard.. it's a goddamn shoe.

    2. Re:aboot by agallagh42 · · Score: 2

      Maybe if you're in Newfoundland. The maritime provinces are the only places up here where people talk funny. The rest of us talk like news anchors. Every wonder why most of the big network news guys are canadian? No accent, none, we speak like the dictionary.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    3. Re:aboot by kontakt · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! If it was moderation day for me, I'd mod this up. That dude on NBC News (I think), John Roberts, used to do the news on a local independent station in Toronto (CITY-TV) back in the 80s. Of course, back then he was called J.D. Roberts.

      Just the most flat, toneless enunciation you can imagine.

      I've yet to hear a Canadian say, "No doot aboot it". Then again, I've never been to the Maritimes.

    4. Re:aboot by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Actually J.D. Roberts was also a MuchMusic VJ in the 80's.... back in the day with Steve Anthony and Erica Ehm.
      God help me I'm old.

    5. Re:aboot by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      It's aboot time someone set the record straight, eh?

    6. Re:aboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or the best way to get an Alpha to load a Linux kernel, eh?

    7. Re:aboot by ilsundalX · · Score: 1

      Okay, we never say "aboot". Eh? on the other hand is somthing you hear quite often. However those who decide to move up here would probably be pretty happy people. We have a decently well educated work force, low cost of living compared to the larger U.S. cities, etc. Not to mention Montreal is probably one of the best cities to party after work in the world(also bars only close at 3am in Quebec). I was a musician for five years and I've been all over North America and Europe doing shows and stuff and Montreal also has one of the best attractive-to-unattractive person ratios by far... Okay I know all these things on a corporate perspective mean little, but hell for the average employee its great here in Montreal... just gotta learn a little french though :P
      Speaking of which, any guys thinking of moving up to Quebec, french girls love a guy speaking french with an english accent... somthing about the guy actually making the effort really gets them going :P

      --
      "Uhhh... yeah... that's it..." ilsundalX lenparr@yahoo.com
  4. Hmmm. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    This is paticularly benneficial for cities like Salt Lake, Boise, and somewhat so for Denver. Havens of white flight with fairly educated populaces.

    1. Re:Hmmm. by forkboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Denver has enough of California's rejects. Tell them to go somewhere else that isn't already over-inflated and over-crowded. They're turning this city into a crazy left-wing Republik just like they did the entire state of Kalifornia.

      Go somewhere like Texas where it's so right-wing that the two will even out into a reasonably sane place to live.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  5. Saying "Eh?" a lot? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot."

    Yeah, but is that really different then saying "Dude", "Man" or "Yeahhhhh" like we say in San Francisco?

    Plus, we won't start to say "eh?" until you say "Francisco" :)

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Saying "Eh?" a lot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to...

      "High tech" should be hyphenated here. Leave your stoners in America where they belong!

    2. Re:Saying "Eh?" a lot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave your stoners in America where they belong!

      You mean North America, right?

    3. Re:Saying "Eh?" a lot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Growing up in Vancouver, I never heard "eh". I thought it was a baseless American joke. But when I got to Toronto, I heard someone use it in a conversation, for the first time. And she used it a lot. It bothered me so much, I asked her, and her response was that she hadn't noticed. *shudder* Fear drinking the local tap water.

  6. It could be worse... by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 3, Funny

    We Canadian's could end all our sentences with "Dontcha know!".

    =)

    1. Re:It could be worse... by Twister002 · · Score: 1

      yah, you betcha.

      --
      "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    2. Re:It could be worse... by georgep77 · · Score: 0

      Or start everyone with "Let me tell you what..."

    3. Re:It could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AAAGGGHHH!!! Horrible memories of Bobby's World....coming back.......NO!!!!!!!!

    4. Re:It could be worse... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      We Canadian's could end all our sentences with "Dontcha know!".

      Yeah, like, totally.

      The thing that gets me is, most often 'eh' isn't a question, it's a statement, like, consider the following examples:

      We're out of beer, eh?

      Yeah, let's get some Elsinores, eh!

      Oh, and it could be even far worse, everyone could be saying 'Warshington' or 'cawfee'.

      Now I gotta get back to my coding...

      fer ah = 1 to alla_them
      iffen aiks(ah) ain't = not_a_goll_darn_thang thain
      preent furmat(aiks(ah), all_purty_lahk)
      iffen aind
      anuther ah
      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:It could be worse... by ergo98 · · Score: 2

      Well in those instances it sortof is a question, with the question being "dontcha think?". :-) Seriously though, eh in Canadiana is turning a simple statement into a conversation : "It's cold out, eh?" is not just a guy making an observation about the weather, but rather soliciting conversation from the other party in the conversation. Almost every area has a variant that serves the same purpose.

      Of course 95% of "Canadiana" that US media likes to mock is actually Minnesotan traits (I don't think there's anything mockworthy about any local trait, but every now and then you get that inferiority complex monkey that tries to pick on regionalisms as inferior somehow).

    6. Re:It could be worse... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Well, the 'eh?' can also be like the rhetorical question, like 'now where did I leave that pencil?' as you are already reaching for it, it requires no answer except from people who only respirate by chattering.

      I lived in Michigan most of my life and just could never get over how much garden-like lower Ontario was, compared to lower Michigan which looks so much like a dump. I just hope a lot of tech and success doesn't spoil it. San Jose has, even after the dotbombs, a lot of business and commerce, and it's a pretty drab and ugly place. I originally planned to move here when I came out west, glad I didn't.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  7. Yes, but its still Oklahoma.... by tacokill · · Score: 1

    You couldn't pay me enough to live there. Nice people. Sheltered world.

    1. Re:Yes, but its still Oklahoma.... by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 1
      You couldn't pay me enough to live there. Nice people. Sheltered world.


      I agree completly! That's why I live in Nebraska. So much more metropolitan. Though, I wouldn't want to live in Omaha - I'd probably get shot just walking from my door to my car!

    2. Re:Yes, but its still Oklahoma.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of a sheltered world... you think Omaha is the hood... you need to travel more.

  8. Sure, whatever. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2

    First off, Canadian's don't say 'eh', well not much anyway... Second, the dollar is worth a lot more over here than in the states. There are a lot of technology companies in the states paying nearly twice as much in salary for US workers, than what they need to pay their Canadian counterparts, for equal, if not better productivity and performance. But with the same logic, the Australian dollar is even cheaper than the Canadian dollar... So should all high tech workers learn Australian slang? I think not.

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Sure, whatever. by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      "Canadian's don't say 'eh', well not much anyway"


      Depends on the area.. My brother owns a place in La Conception (about 50mins north-west of Montreal) and almost everybody up there says eh, A LOT!

    2. Re:Sure, whatever. by b0r0din · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the tech workforce there is subsidized by the Canadian government (which is also why a lot of film companies do their filming there). There has been a large movement of late to specifically move phone technical support workers there; after all, it's cheaper to hire/train/pay and there's no geographical problem with telephone switching, which is virtually instantaneous.

    3. Re:Sure, whatever. by Succa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most people overlook Canada when it comes to being a tech "hotbed", but there are lots of great companies up here. Ottawa (Corel, Alcatel, Nortel [!]), Waterloo (RIM, Open Text), Burnaby BC (Electronic Arts), Toronto (guh...I dunno), and Montreal (Softimage, Discreet, Zero Knowledge) are the cities I'd be choosing to set up shop. Ottawa in particular has a wealth of (struggling) tech companies over in the west end, as well as the Ottawa Linux Symposium. Canada: not just for doughnuts anymore!

    4. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not really it.. It's the fact that Canada seems to have the broadband thing down. Not only that but the strippers dance nude and you can drink and touch em with their permission obviously. Also the fact that not much else is different in Canada. we don't really care about politics and your women certainly aren't half bad looking. You also have a good population of white/black/latino etc.. diff cultures and stuff. I think I'm gonna go up north for a couple of weeks and hang out.. Should be fun, eh?

    5. Re:Sure, whatever. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      Actually, you *do* say "eh". You just don't notice it when you do, eh?
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    6. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you're talking aboot, eh? :-)

    7. Re:Sure, whatever. by willy_me · · Score: 2

      The east says "eh", the west sounds just like Seattle.

    8. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alias, Matrox and ATI too.

    9. Re:Sure, whatever. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      >Not to mention that the tech workforce there is subsidized by the Canadian government

      Depends what industry. Obviously, our social programs which are not privatized are indeed paid by the government. The film industry gets breaks, not in salary subsidizing, but in tax breaks, mostly.

      Other than that, the lower expectations of standards of living, cheaper services (postal, health) has alot to do with lower salary demands. Make no mistake, too much privatization leads to higher costs of living, albeit maybe better products and services.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    10. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are a lot of technology companies in the states paying nearly twice as much in salary for US workers

      Canadians are extremely competitive internationally. Americans are simply over-paid; that is why America is an importer nation, because American-made products are also over-priced internationally.

    11. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever, eh! What part of Canada are you talking about, eh?. Me, eh, and many others I know talk Canadian, eh...

    12. Re:Sure, whatever. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      American CEOs are overpaid. The workers are getting probably closest to their fair share than anyplace else. If other places had a union, ala Canada, then they would get paid more fairly.

      The person in the article was foolish enough to suggest that American corporations will be taking their workers with them when / if they leave. What a joke.

    13. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the tech workforce there is subsidezed by the Canadian government

      This statement, in my experience, is more myth than reality.

      Our company looked into government grants, income and other tax incentives and found very little government help exists.

      However the differnce between our dollar, and the American dollar presents a strong incentive for companies to have their <b>cost centres here in Canada.</b> Every day in Canada is a 35% off the sticker price sale for Americans(today's exchange is 0.6241 CAD in USD).

      The relatively low American income tax rates encourage Canadian companies to move their <b>revenue centres south of the 49th.</b>

      The net result of this arrangement is that a company is paying the lower Canadian costs of production, and selling in the higher US Dollar, to the larger US Market, with the lower US income tax. It is a great arrangement. I know of a few guys who have set their companies up in this way.

    14. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely! Anyone who says Canadians don't say Eh must just live in an area where people don't. Or there are so many foreigners there who haven't acclimatized and started to say "eh" yet.

    15. Re:Sure, whatever. by aiabx · · Score: 1

      Arnprior, Ontario is the centre of eh-ness. The further you get from Anprior, the less likely you are to hear "eh". But we still all say it sometimes. I usually hear it as a contraction of "isn't it?"; for instance, "The hockey team is great, eh?".
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    16. Re:Sure, whatever. by Garak · · Score: 1

      They say eh alot in ontairo and thats about it. Here in newfoundland you can tell what town they are from by their accent.

      Here in stephenville which was the harmon US airforce base, we are pretty american in our speech. Where my family comes from in the vally an hour away its very scottish/irish. People from the east coast put e in front of h alot, so it's heggs insted of eggs. Their are many other examples of this.

      --
      God, root, what is the difference?
    17. Re:Sure, whatever. by dr · · Score: 1

      Most people overlook Canada when it comes to being a tech "hotbed"

      It's funny how everyone always overlooks Calgary. Well, at least the article didn't neglect to mention it. Often Calgary is thought to be synonymous oil and gas. And while that is true to a point, there are a lot of technology-based companies here. And becuase of the oil and gas influence, there is a lot of money to be spent on cool technologies. Take TransCanada (where I happen to be at these days). TC is a huge pipeline company that isn't afraid to spend money on leading edge technologies. Pretty cool if you can handle the bureaucracy.

      As for the "eh?" comments, well I don't think you can really generalize regions as there are a lot of Westerners out east and vice versa. Regardless of where you are, you are gonna hear it... more often than not.
      -dr

    18. Re:Sure, whatever. by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      You forgot a few: Matrox (Montreal), and ATi (Markham, Ontario), who are (if you ask me), two of the top video card makers there are, and Ballard Power of Burnaby.

      In fact, there are dozens of huge names in Canada that no one knows are Canadian, mostly for the same reason no company lets on that it's a one-man operation: no one would take them seriously. People think 'Canada? They don't have any big companies.' Surprise! ;)

      --Dan

    19. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>You also have a good population of white/black/latino etc.. diff cultures and stuff

      After Sweden and Utah, it is the whitest place I have ever visited. WTF are you talking about?

    20. Re:Sure, whatever. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      That really smacks of American Bashing.
      Thank you for reading /. located in the USA.

      American cost of living is higher. This also helps with excess spending, which in turns helps all the other countries. Americans also work more hours and take less vacations. We work average 50 hours a week in the US. We produce 80% of the worlds top movies and music. ARPAnet aka Internet was designed and implemented in the USA.

      My favorite story was a company that moved all its call centers to India. Just to find out that the call centers had to close due to some riots and local gun fights. Company thought it would save money, but lost many of its big customers.

      Americans arnt overpaid, in our market, we are paid just right.

    21. Re:Sure, whatever. by morrisonsean · · Score: 1

      Toronto:

      ATI (the chip company)
      IBM labs (lot of Java work)
      Hummingbird (X on Windows)

    22. Re:Sure, whatever. by kontakt · · Score: 1

      I don't know about black or latino, but I've heard that in 2003 there will be more Cantonese speaking individuals in Canada than French speakers. In Toronto alone, with a greater metro population of about 5 million, there's something like 1 million Chinese folks. And hey, I'm not complaining.

      Most of the large cities here are *very* diverse. The more smaller towns and rural areas aren't. But isn't it the same way in the good old you ess of eh?

    23. Re:Sure, whatever. by SETY · · Score: 1

      The American Dollar is overvalued. That is a fact. The Economist harps on about it every week.
      This would not matter if America didn't trade with any other countries and were there own little island.
      The Dollar will drop soon though, it is not sustainable.

    24. Re:Sure, whatever. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Americans arnt overpaid, in our market, we are paid just right.
      Right, we're just overworked.

    25. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure which strip clubs you were in, but the last few I've been in, there were people getting tossed out the door quite violently when they attempted to grope a stripper...

      We have a lot of different cultures in Canada, but they are not the same as those you find in the US. Here it is mostly croatian, asian, east indian, and native. In the midwest, there are very few latinos or blacks.

    26. Re:Sure, whatever. by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Yea, Calgary's got a little of everything, but I find it too big for my tastes. I like smaller cities like Halifax and Saskatoon.

      As for the regional "eh" thing, Canada is a VERY big "region". You can notice the difference in accent even from Saskatoon to Winnepeg, and each group has its own use of the word "eh".

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    27. Re:Sure, whatever. by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      So should all high tech workers learn Australian slang? I think not.

      We've seen the Foster's commercials. Is Australia really like that?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    28. Re:Sure, whatever. by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      We produce 80% of the worlds top movies and music.

      And we're the home of McDonald's! Yippee! Sorry I mentioned it, for those of you who've just eaten lunch...

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    29. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the tech workforce there is subsidized by the Canadian government (which is also why a lot of film companies do their filming there).

      This depends on the industry and the equating of tax breaks with "subsidization". The reason that filming gets so many breaks is that it is a government agenda to grow a world-class film industry in Canada. The same model has been applied to the music industry and it has worked quite well, resulting in world-class singers, song writers, and production studios.

      The most damnable thing about Can-Con is that it works. Also, it's not like you can't switch your TV to any of the major American stations and watch them (with Canadian commericals--what a scam!).

    30. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 2

      People think 'Canada? They don't have any big companies.' Surprise! ;)

      Other examples might include:

      Ford Motors Canada
      General Motors Canada
      Daimler-Chrysler Canada
      Toyota Canada
      IBM Canada
      Microsoft Canada

      Few people would believe that Canada is one of the world's top exporters of cars. Hypothetically, the profits are sent back to the global headquarters, but on cars anyway, the profit margin is low and the jobs, infrastructure, and subsidiary industries are Canadian. It also makes a lot more sense than using over-paid American unions.

      Stick the word "Canada" in your name and slap a maple leaf on your logo and you're good to go!

    31. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 1

      Don't strippers take off their tops and bottoms everywhere these days?

    32. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 1

      How many are in 'Hongcouver'?

    33. Re:Sure, whatever. by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 2
      We produce 80% of the worlds top movies and music

      Nope, you produce 80% of the world's best marketed movies and music. There's a huge difference.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    34. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It totally depends where you go and, even then, diversity is the wrong word. Yes, there are huge numbers of diverse ethnicities, but they're severely concentrated. Vancouver, for example, has a huge non-white population -- about 90% (educated guess) of which is asian. Toronto has a huge amount of non whites, but most of those are either asian or east-indian.

      Having lived in two Canadian cities throughout my life, one of which is around a million people, I can easily walk down the street without seeing anything but white faces. That's not a value judgement either way, but it's definitely not a rainbow of diversity everywhere one goes.

    35. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very clever. Now replace "eh" with "like" or "fuck" and suddenly you're talking like an American! You should probably threaten to either shoot me or sue me somewhere in there as well to really get it right.

    36. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you don't live in Texas.
      It's a bitch getting to work on horseback.

    37. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to overpaid Canadian Union Employees?

    38. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [snicker!]

    39. Re:Sure, whatever. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      I live pretty much due south of Ottawa, so yeah, most of the Canadian I hear would be that way.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    40. Re:Sure, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unionized Americans are overpaid.

    41. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 1

      As opposed to overpaid Canadian Union Employees?

      Do you mean Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE)? They're government workers; you wouldn't expect them to be competitive and they don't make any commercial goods or services.

  9. Yeesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot.

    Guffaw! The 'merkin made a funny!

    I guess you'll have to start saying "aboot" and buy snowshoes, too, huh?

    Idiots.

  10. Amazing. by BigZaphod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it amazing that they are moving out of large US cities into Canda instead of just moving to the midwest or something. Chicago is quite a lot cheaper than the coastal cities, and it has all the usual big-city perks.

    Of course there are also a lot of small citys that would kill for some high-tech company to move in. Seems like they could get some pretty good deals if they used that option.

    Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?

    1. Re:Amazing. by red5 · · Score: 1

      Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?

      Long distance bills.
      It's cheaper to call Canada from California then it is to call New York.

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    2. Re:Amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the high mucky-mucks who run them like to be near the coasts, and the also like to have the serfs nearby to keep an eye on them.

      Works fine for me, I happen to think that Southern California is the finest city on the planet.

    3. Re:Amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might want to go back to junior Geography class.
      Calgary isn't even near a coast. It's as far from the coast as North Dakota.

    4. Re:Amazing. by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?

      Because the concentrations of population and other companies are on the coasts. Chicken, meet Egg.

    5. Re:Amazing. by ChazeFroy · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Chicago is tied to the coast of Lake Michigan.

    6. Re:Amazing. by cat_jesus · · Score: 1
      Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?
      Because that's where the yacht clubs are. What's the point in being an executive if you can't join an exclusive yacht club?

      Cat
    7. Re:Amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hum, I don't think so. It may be cheaper to call Vancouver or Calgary from California, but to call Montreal, Toronto or St-Johns from California is twice as expensive as calling from New York.

      Canada is BIGGER then the US, remember?

    8. Re:Amazing. by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The article doesn't say that a bunch of companies are moving to Canada, only that the cost benefits might be there.

      As for the coasts vs. the world, I think it's more of a media bias, reflected in the graph shown in the article, where almost all the cities mentioned are on or near the East or West coasts. Plus, not *all* of a company has to move; example: Boeing moving their headquarters to Chicago while manufacturing stays in Washington State.

      I *should* stay out of that whole Oklahoma thread at the top, but it calls to mind what college football star (and failed actor) Brian Bosworth once said, that Big 12 towns like Norman, Oklahoma and Lincoln, Nebraska were akin to the worst of what the Soviet Union had to offer.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    9. Re:Amazing. by red5 · · Score: 1

      Most longdistance cariers charge a flatrate for all calls to canada. Most calls to canada go off a satilite and to a regonial grid so it dosn't matter if your calling Vancouver or Toronto. It still costs the longdistance carier the same amount in access charges so they charge you the same rate. It's the regonial grid thats the bigiest cost and they are cheaper in canada.

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    10. Re:Amazing. by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Actually, Calgary is closer to the cost than North Dakota by about 600 miles. You're thinking of Regina or Saskatoon... they're north (and a little west) of North Dakota.

      Alberta doesn't even border ND. It borders Montana (and only Montana)

      Who needs the geography lesson?

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    11. Re:Amazing. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      Kansas City is a pretty good place too. Sprint World Headquarters is there and they have tons and tons of bandwidth that is cheap compared to most places. Again being in the Midwest the costs are all reduced. Land, utilities, cost of living, cost of workers etc is reduced a lot.

      I love the coast (Miami is great!) but the Midwest is just a cheaper place to live and own a business.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    12. Re:Amazing. by Graabein · · Score: 1
      Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?

      I can't answer for them, but I grew up by the sea myself. If I go inland for long I start feeling sort of trapped, if you know what I mean.

      It's very odd, I know it's irrational, but I can't help it. Happens every time.

      --
      And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  11. other related news by lemonhed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There has been alot of commentary on this subject. The Gartner group put out this commentary about the "Tech Wreck" coming to the SF Bay area.

    They claim that a city will do well if they install a broadband communications network that connects citizens, local businesses and the global marketplace.

    I think that the obvious solution to this may be Telecomutting See this link for more info

    1. Re:other related news by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you hit the nail on the head with telecomuting. As long as 3 years ago I heard aobut companies looking for places other than Atlanta simply due to poor transportaion with a lack of mass transit. More companies are getting sauvey (sp?) to the fact that 2+ hour commutes to and from work have HUGE hidden costs. As far as cities selling themselves as a good place for businesses, transportation or telecommuting is going to become more and more important.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:other related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Naaah, Californians will just insist on commuting from their SF homes to Canada. They love those long morning drives.

    3. Re:other related news by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Don't laugh. My 300 mile monday morning commute takes less time than those of some of my colleagues here in SoCal.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:other related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear these stories about companies running away from the Bay Area, but all I see in practice is the opposite. I've been involved in two startups in Northern CA (as in 2 hours north of the bay), that have both consolidated to locations in the bay. Why? It sure ain't cheaper down there, and it sure ain't a nicer place to live (try to find a tree, other than a landscaped palm tree, in San Jose).

    5. Re:other related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from the inablility to spell 'savvy' (if that was the intention), I'd say the poster is most definitely NOT a foreigner.

    6. Re:other related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so we can work in San Francisco without having to live there. Great idea!

  12. It's always been like this by Jaden42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bay Area economy has always been like this. Anyone who has been here for more then 10 years will realise that the entire thing is cyclical. Years of boom, then years of bust.

    If you stick around long enough, you'll even see it yourself. Eventually, the next big thing(tm) will make its way back to the Bay Area and everyone will re-locate here again.

  13. California by TheRealFixer · · Score: 1

    The cost of living is just getting ridiculous in California. I don't even live in a major met area, but apartment and gas prices are rising month after month, and average wages haven't increased a dime in my county in about 4 years. So, it doesn't surprise me that companies are leaving for greener pastures.

    There's a mass exodus going on in California. I looked into renting a moving truck to go across the country. The cost was insane, and the reason given? Trucks are leaving the state so fast that they can't keep them in stock, and almost none are coming back this way.

    1. Re:California by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      Well, the exodus makes up for all the people that came here during the dot bomb. Change is a scary scary thing.

    2. Re:California by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      There's a mass exodus going on in California. I looked into renting a moving truck to go across the country.

      If you go to Oklahoma (see earlier thread for all the niceties there), make sure you read _The Grapes of Wrath_ upside down, before you go.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'course there' no trucks moving into ca ... not when it's so easy ta swim-da-river ... eh pad're ??

  14. Bad news for San Francisco - Bad strategy by Cirrocco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    San Francisco landlords threw out long-term tenants in favor of tenants who could only afford rent for the short-term. Bad strategy. Now that dot-coms have gone to the away place San Francisco is now full of empty building and landlords begging tenants to come back. They aren't lowering the cost of rent, though. They expect that people will continue to pay the outrageous rents that the dot-coms paid. Survey says? BZZZZZT!! Oh, I'm sorry! It looks like you'll have to forgo the new Mercedes this year, Mr. Landlord.

    Bad karma revisits landlords who threw out poor people for those who could handle higher rents! News at 11!

    1. Re:Bad news for San Francisco - Bad strategy by ethereal · · Score: 1

      So, are whole neighborhoods going to be reverse-yuppified now? I bet JWZ's happy :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    2. Re:Bad news for San Francisco - Bad strategy by jsmith_250 · · Score: 1

      I think the west cost is in for a big reconing, don't get me wrong. But.... But let's not forget the age old concept supply and demand. If the landlords are in the red, they will do what it takes it get things back in the black. Let us not forget, that these buildings may of cost the landlords tons of cash. People or leaving, they have to fix it, the market is working. Th

    3. Re:Bad news for San Francisco - Bad strategy by kfg · · Score: 1

      Landlords have always been a bit iffy on the conept of "supply and demand" and tend to actually believe their properties are "worth" some fixed amount.

      What has always amazed me is not so much that, but the fact that many of them take so long to fail to catch on that they lose nearly the entire capital value of the property as well by letting the building fall into a hole in the ground, rather than renting them for what they could actually get.

      KFG

    4. Re:Bad news for San Francisco - Bad strategy by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      They aren't lowering the cost of rent, though. They expect that people will continue to pay the outrageous rents that the dot-coms paid.

      Oh now, they've been lowering the rents in San Francisco. That apartment that cost $1800/month might only rent for $1700/month now. This is how the landlords there think -- when you have to lower prices, do it by an insignificant amount, say, $100/month or so. But when you can raise prices, jack them up really high (if lack of rent control lets you get away with it), an increase of $300+/month. If you would graph the average prices of SF apartments, I bet it would look like a steep wavey staircase.

  15. ND by austad · · Score: 3

    I heard that tech companies are planning on moving to North Dakota. Of course, only after the state gets electricity, and Telco. And they'll still have to convince residents not to run them out with pitchforks and torches while yelling charges of witchery.

    Then there's that little issue of finding the road during the winter since the ditches fill with snow and are level with the highway. Wow, I can't believe I actually lived there for over a year and made it out alive. The newest computer that I saw in that state was my apple IIe, which was 13 years old at the time. The only other computer I saw was at a bank, and made in the early 70's.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:ND by Nameis · · Score: 1

      Well, the tech companies are here (heard of a little place called http://www.greatplains.com ?), and we do have both power (more than CA!) and some decent telcos. I have sweet DSL in a town of 1300! (http://www.hettingernd.com)
      True, sometimes we have poor winters, but no more so than Minneapolis and a lot of people seem to live there. This winter we've had basically *no* snow, and temps have been warm. Yay for global warming!
      I work as a tech coordinator for two rural ND counties, and both have labs with PC's quite a bit more modern than Apple IIe's.
      Haven't seen too many pitchforks or torches recently either...perhaps you mistook ND for Canada by mistake?

    2. Re:ND by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2
      First of all... screw global warming. I have not used my snowmobile at all this year. I was so sad I had to go out and buy a new motorcycle on one of those 50-degree February days.

      Secondly, your winters in North Dakota are worse than ours here in Minneapolis. You're out on the prarie and get all that blowing and drifting. The interstate never gets closed in this part of Minnesota.

      While having more jobs and money is nice, I hate all the idiots from the coast moving here. It ruins all the good things about the midwest. Stay out of "fly-over country"! It's dull and boring... and people are nice and no pollution and lots of open space and nature... I mean it sucks! Stay in LA!

    3. Re:ND by jslag · · Score: 1
      here in Minneapolis. . .people are nice and no pollution and lots of open space and nature


      Are you really talking about Minneapolis proper? I live and work in Minneapolis, and my daily routine is chock full of jerks, air pollution, and pavement as far as the eye can see. It's not bad for a city but let's not get carried away.


      I have not used my snowmobile at all this year


      Don't know a single person in Minneapolis with a snowmobile - more of a suburb thing really.

    4. Re:ND by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Yeah, a lot of jerks in Minneapolis. Pavement as far as eye can see though, it only true because all the good places are below eye level. No, not underground, down by the river bank. Cross the stone arch bridge from downtown, (on foot), and go down the steps. They are a little hidden, but you suddenly find yourself in an area where the only signs of civialization are ruins from the late 1800s. (of course walk a few more steps on the dirt path an you can see a modern city again) One of my favorite places, and right downtown.

    5. Re:ND by mccoma · · Score: 1
      Actually, I can get a T1 in some parts of ND cheaper than in Minnesota. North Dakota has a lot going for it if the state government would start attracting tech businesses.


      North Dakota exports 70% of the electricity generated to other state. No Rolling Brown Outs. Cost of living is way low, and a good 3 bedroom apartment is in the $800 range for the two larger cities.


      Yeah, snow sucks, but it has been an extemely mild winter. Also, stay on the east side of the state. Fargo and Grand Forks would be good places for businesses. Western ND would not be

    6. Re:ND by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2

      Like the other poster said, there's plenty of nature to be found. Along the river is a great place, not just by the Stone Arch Bridge either. There's a trail system along both side of the river through most of the city. Then there's the Fort Snelling State Park, the lakes, and the Minnehaha Parkway. When I lived near downtown I rode by bike through the Grand Rounds nearly every day.

    7. Re:ND by stevedc2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds good, but unfortunately, once you start bringing in the tech firms, and the jobs start rolling, that ever-present human trait of GREED will soon render your rents and housing costs unaffordable..

      It happened in Loudoun County Virginia... it can happen anywhere...because greedy landlords and developers are everywhere :)

    8. Re:ND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did this "ND" article get a score of 3 without any label like "Informative" or "Disgusting" or anything like that? Is there some kind of superkarma that gets your articles auto-scored to 3 instead of 2?

    9. Re:ND by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      North Dakota has a lot going for it if the state government would start attracting tech businesses.

      You don't want that, because then that would be a sell-out, and we'd have an endless thread on /. about it: "State Governments get in bed with Corporations, sell out the People." Let's just nip that in the bud.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  16. So they're going to Take Off, eh? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, having lived around the Bay Area for the last 5 years, it's no surprise. Evictions were as outrageous as rent increases, making space for tech company offices and then screwing their employees through rent.

    The median cost of rent where I live is the highest in the country. It's a nice place, but I could be buying a house in Ohio every five years, it's that bad. Firemen, police, teachers, gardeners, and others with lower incomes have been leaving the area and are very hard to recruit. The irony is, where tech industries fled to, early on, have become a similar problem. Austin, TX is a great example, seeing insanely rapid growth and the problems it brought, Sacramento, CA went the same route in the mid 80's. However, if you're looking for a decent place out of SF, Sacto isn't a bad place to go. Lots of office space and lower cost of living.

    Canada? Wouldn't the taxes alone make that less appealing? When I think it's expensive in California, all I have to do is remember the GST and PST I paid in Ontario. Gads. Probably lots of available land, but so has most of the midwest.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
      > Canada? Wouldn't the taxes alone make that less appealing? When I think it's expensive in California, all I have to do is remember the GST and PST I paid in Ontario. Gads. Probably lots of available land, but so has most of the midwest.

      According to Ernst & Young Canada Tax Calculator, marginal rates in most provinces top out at around 40-50%.

      If you're in CA (California) and making $US 75K, you're paying a marginal federal rate of 27%, plus 9.3% state taxes (on everything over $30000), plus 6.3% for the SS pyramid scheme (up to $86000 and increasing by 5% per year), plus another 1.5% for medicare taxes. Works out to a marginal rate of about 45%.

      If you're in .ca (Canada) and making $CAD 75K, you've stopped paying into CPP (the Canadian version of the SS pyramid scheme) and EI (unemployment insurance) after C$35K or so. The marginal rates aren't really any different.

      Of course, a $CAD is worth about $0.63 US, so your C$80K is only $50K. But the cost of living is much lower.

      Got investments? Canada taxes capital gains at only half the marginal rates, and has no long-term vs. short-term rate difference. (In the US, you have to hold it for a year to qualify for the 20% "long-term" federal rate, and in CA, you're still paying that 9.3% CA income tax on it. So your long-term capital gains in California are taxed at 29.3%, and your short-term trades are at 40%. In Canada, all trades are taxed at about 20%.)

      GST/PST? OK, compare 15% vs. 8.25%. But how much do you spend, vs. how much do you save? The better-off you are, the less a consumption tax hits you.

      And if you have kids, what do you get for your money? In the US, you pretty much need a private school and university education costs are about double. And you have to pay for your own medical insurance. In Canada, the health care for Bad Stuff (cancer, etc) sucks ass, but for 90% of the population that only has to deal with colds, flu, and the occasional broken bone, it seems pretty good.

      Bottom line - The US may be tax-competitive for an individual, but California sure as fuck ain't.

    2. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2

      There's still a long, long way to go before house prices are reasonable here. I haven't noticed purchase or rental prices falling much. "Charming shithole: $650,000." In "Noe Valley" of course which means "Bayview" if a realtor says it. The landlords are still kidding themselves, but once residential vacancy gets up around 10%, things will start to crumble. Look at the massive investments in buildings like the "Paramount" at Mission and Third: more than 500 units, almost all empty, with stupid asking prices for an ugly building in a boring neighborhood. That's still the mindset of the landlords around here. Ugh.

    3. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would add, the high-tech companies that moved to RTP, NC had the same effect here. Property prices have nearly doubled in the 10 years between 1992 and 2002; as a result of Silicone Valley (Cisco?) companies moving here.

    4. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post! mod up!

    5. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Well I live very comfortably on $50k(US)/year. I paid ~7% national tax rate after deductions and exemptions. Throw in your figure of 6.3% for SS and a couple of % points for Ohio state taxes. Not too bad overall. Plus as one poster pointed out you can get a house here for what a couple years rent in CA costs (an average 3 bedroom house in a very nice middle class suburb where my parents live costs ~120k or 2 1/2 years salery. All of that and I get to have a decent medical plan. All in all the midwest is a great place to live. The last few winters have been super mild and the fall's here can't be beat. I just wish we could get over the rustbelt image and get some high tech companies to move large operations here.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Of course, a $CAD is worth about $0.63 US, so your C$80K is only $50K. But the cost of living is much lower.

      Foreign-exchange rates are fairly meaningless in this context. The purchasing-power parity of a loonie is around $0.79 US (you get more value from buying things within Canada, and that's where you spend most of your money anyway; it includes the cost-of-living factor). So, your C$80K is worth US$63.

      In Canada, the health care for Bad Stuff (cancer, etc) sucks ass

      OTOH, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you.

    7. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      OTOH, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you.

      No, just kill you.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    8. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by ChronoZ · · Score: 1

      Don't quote me on this, but under certain conditions, some (small) companies can apply for PST exemption. Would make things a little better, eh?

    9. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't the comparison in marginal tax rates be at the corporate level, rather than at the individual level?

      Here are reasons why an IT-industry corporation might move from the US to Vancouver:
      - lower salaries - this is a company's biggest variable cost; comparable talent
      - lower cost for rent - rent is often a company's biggest fixed cost; during a recessionary period, being locked in to a long-term rental agreement works against a company that has to downsize
      - lower cost for employee benefits -- e.g., tuition ($6000 tuition to get your Masters), health ($800/yr)
      - big city infrastructure - telecom, utilities (really low electricity costs)

      In contrast, here are reasons to pick a different Canadian city:
      - BC is at least 5 yrs behind other provinces in balancing its budget; expect personal and corporate taxes to go up
      - the lag from the economic "multiplier effect" from the dot com boom is really starting to show -- for example, we're now seeing huge demands for pay increases in the public sector; expect all costs to go up
      - higher taxes: increasing property taxes; corporate capital tax on assets over $1M; a non-recoverable 7.5% PST (Provicial Sales Tax, aka Social Services Tax)
      - less comparable support for scientific research & development (e.g., investment tax credits)

    10. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > > OTOH, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you.
      >
      > No, just kill you.

      Well, you've both got good points.

      In Canada, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you, because the quality of care is lower -- but there's no guarantee you'd have gotten that care in the States anyways.

      Why? In the States, unless you're paying through the nose for "anything goes" health coverage, the insurance company will do its damnedest to deny you reimbursement anyways.

      There were many cases of people at HMOs (for Canadians, that's the not-high-end option) that got letters from their insurance companies saying "Holy crap, cancer? That could cost our company a bundle! If you don't get a second opinion from one of our doctors (heh-heh!), we won't pay for your treatment. Our doctor should be able to see you in, oh, 6 months! What, your doc says the cancer will probably be untreatable by then? Gosh, that's just too bad!"

      When pressed for a comparison, I'd say Canadian health care is like a "malice-free" HMO. Because of the profit motive, the HMO wants you to die cheaply, and will work to prevent your doctor from treating you. The Canuck doctor, on the other hand, wants to help, but because of the lack of profit motive, there are fewer Canuck doctors who can help (less profit == fewer MRI machines, etc. at hospitals) and you end up with delayed or second-tier treatment anyways.

      The underlying reasons are completely different, but the results are the same - both systems' doctors end up being hamstrung by their respective systems :(

    11. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In the US, you pretty much need a private school"

      I'm sure they tell you that in Canada so you don't realize how ponderous it is to live in the great white north.

    12. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Be cautious when comparing sales taxes. The GST (in all provinces) and PST (in BC) are out-in-front: they're calculated during the consumer sale. But for many provinces and states, the federal and state/provincial taxes are hidden: they're calculated before the product hits the shelves. You still pay the tax, but you don't have to calculate it.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    13. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those who are going to argue about health care systems would do themselves justice reading Canada's Burning, an expose on the media lies that are being fed to us all.

      You may well find that what you thought you knew to be true, isn't.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    14. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Those who are going to argue about health care systems would do themselves justice reading Canada's Burning, an expose on the media lies that are being fed to us all.

      Dude, if I had mod points and hadn't posted to this thread, I'd mod you up. That's an excellent article, and covers both sides.

    15. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by csbruce · · Score: 1

      So, your C$80K is worth US$63

      Er, US$63*K*.

    16. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by csbruce · · Score: 1

      GST is also deductable for all corporations. (The theory is that it is only to be paid by the end consumers of a good or service; if you're in the middle of the chain, you deduct it.)

    17. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dude, if I had mod points and hadn't posted to this thread, I'd mod you up. That's an excellent article, and covers both sides.

      RIGHT!!! WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? It is so pro-nationalize health care it is not even funny. If you had lived under both systems (note: I have) you would know the problems with both. Bottom line: even if you have HMO in the US you have *WAY* better health care than if you are living in Canada.

    18. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is so pro-nationalize health care it is not even funny.

      Actually, the article takes no stand on the relative merits of either system. It is about inaccurate and reporting on Canadian healthcare. The uninformed, distorted news stories that it describes are not even funny.

      If you had lived under both systems (note: I have) you would know the problems with both.

      Granted, the article doesn't mention your particular experience under either system but aside from your assertion that you've lived in both countries, neither do you.

      In any case, I trust there's nothing in your personal experience that contradicts this point from the article: Canada insured 100 percent of its citizens for $2,250 per person in l998 while the United States expended $4,270 per person insuring only 84 percent of our citizens.

    19. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      I dunno. I have a PPO plan, as do most people I know. It sucks if you don't have insurance, of course, but hospitals can't turn away people requireing immediate, urgent care (this includes women about to give birth despite occasional propaganda to the contrary).

      The thing is, unemployment is generally low, even in a recession (5% is considered high), and most people who work have insurance.

      My father died (in Canada), of a ruptured aortic anurysm. It was discovered a few years earlier during a hernia repair operation and he was not told. By U.S. standards, surgery would have been possible, albeit with a 30-40% mortality rate. By Canadian standards, surgery was not possible, and because of all the taxes he paid during his life to support, among the other things, the Canadian health care system, he couldn't have afforded surgery in the U.S. (though, had I known, I could have afforded to pay for it).

      I think it better that people die for lack of money to save themselves than lack of technology to save them, as undesirable as either option is. If only the very rich can afford something today, more will be able to afford it tomorrow, and everyone within a generation. From my personal experience spending a week in an American hospital in 1998, Canadian health care was barbaric by comparison.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    20. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      My father died (in Canada), of a ruptured aortic anurysm.

      Medical malpractice occurs in every health care system. Condemning a whole system based on one possible example is unreasonable.

      I think it better that people die for lack of money to save themselves than lack of technology to save them...

      These alternatives in no way describe the difference between Canadian and American health care. Every western country except the U.S. has adopted some system of public health insurance to allow universal access to health care.

      ...Canadian health care was barbaric by comparison.

      Canadian health care is not barbaric by any standard. What's absurd, if not barbaric, is the fact that half of the one million Americans who file for bankruptcy each year do so because of medical bills and other problems arising from serious illness or injury. It's a problem that does not occur in Canada.

    21. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Medical malpractice occurs in every health care system. Condemning a whole system based on one possible example is unreasonable.

      When the system is run by the state, without recourse to alternatives (it is generally not possible for Canadians to pay for medical care: Canadian doctors who accept payment can not be part of the national health care system, and the taxes are so high that few can afford to go to American hospitals. It is argued, in fact, that it is "unfair" for some to afford "better" care while other's can't. Of course this does not stop Canadian politicians from , often at the Canadian taxpayer's expense.), it is quite appropriate to hold "the system" ultimately accountable for the practices of it's practitioners.

      In my father's case, I found out that he was not informed of the gravity of his illness precisely because the Canadian health care system could not help him, and another one could, if only for enough money, thus perpetuating the lie that Canada has the best health care system in the world. While "available to all" might be one interpretation of "best", it certainly isn't the only one. I'm told that Canada now routinely does send gravely ill people to the U.S. for technologically superior care. I'm sure those people thank their favorite deity that such a place exists.

      The bottom line is that people die in Canada because there isn't enough quality health care to go around, and ultimately the state choses who lives or dies.

      Frankly, I think it better that life and death be decided by chance than by governmental decree. No government has the right to play the part of a deity.

      What's absurd, if not barbaric, is the fact that half of the one million Americans who file for bankruptcy each year do so because of medical bills and other problems arising from serious illness or injury.

      Better broke than dead, no? Bankruptcy in the U.S. isn't the stigma it is in Canada, espescially because of things like medical bills. It isn't pleasant, of course, but better than the alternative. If the Canadian government were to provide health care to everyone, regardless of need, instead of such individual bancruptcies, the state as a whole would incure a heaver debt load to be distributed on the backs of all Canadians. Should the healthy bear the costs of the sick to that degree?

      Americans generally say, "No way! I've got my own expenses to worry about." Canadians, OTOH, seam happy to let the government pick who lives and who dies, hoping that they get to live. Not being one to trust government very much (less is better), I prefer to place my economic well-being at the hand of the charity of my fellows if I find myself in dire need, rather than my life at the hands of the state.

      That's why this Canadian legally works in the U.S.A. and pays taxes to an American government.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    22. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      The bottom line is that people die in Canada because there isn't enough quality health care to go around, and ultimately the state choses who lives or dies.

      The two most basic indicators of health care are the infant mortality rate and life expectancy. In both these stats, Canada is ahead of the United States. Infant mortality in Canada is 5.0/1000 live births vs. 6.7/1000 in the U.S. Life expectancy in Canada is 79.5 years vs 77.3 in the U.S. If the Canadian government is deciding anything, it is that more children should live and live longer.

      Should the healthy bear the costs of the sick to that degree?

      That's the way insurance works, even in the U.S.

      That's why this Canadian legally works in the U.S.A.

      Let us hope then that you don't have a catastrophic illness and have your insurance cancelled or get laid off and have no insurance at all. You can, of course, always come back to Canada and receive treatment as soon as you cross the border.

    23. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      The two most basic indicators of health care are the infant mortality rate and life expectancy. In both these stats [cia.gov], Canada is ahead of the United States. Infant mortality in Canada is 5.0/1000 live births vs. 6.7/1000 in the U.S. Life expectancy in Canada is 79.5 years vs 77.3 in the U.S. If the Canadian government is deciding anything, it is that more children should live and live longer.

      These differences do not strike me as statistically different. Furthermore, the U.S. has populations where environmental risks are likely to result in greater mortality rates overall. You could argue, I suppose, that this is due to the same attitudes that make a lack of socialized medicine a bad thing, but I'd consider the correlation much stronger with the higher overall and local population density.

      That's the way insurance works, even in the U.S.

      Except, insurance in the U.S. is voluntary and you can generally chose your carrier (though employers often have preferred carriers at attractive group rates). Unlike a nationalized health care system, insurers have to compete for business. Monopolies are generally bad for the consumer. Involuntary monopolies are worse.

      You can, of course, always come back to Canada and receive treatment as soon as you cross the border.

      No, I can't. Not for six months anyway. If I returned, I'd have to pay into the health insurance system for six months before I could collect any benefits. Of course, I could retain insurance in the U.S. for that period, or indefinately. To be fair, I was entitled to Canadian health insurance benefits for 6 months after I left, but surrendered my rights to them so that I could claim non-residency -- a rather difficult thing to do.

      In fact, I could not claim Canadian health insurance benefits six months after having left Canada even if I elected to continue paying Canadian taxes (dual tax residency is possible, for example, if I continued to own a home in Canada). The residency requirements for taxation are not the same as the residency requirements to collect benefits.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    24. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      These differences do not strike me as statistically different.

      The U.S. is the highest in these categories of all western countries. The difference is usually attributed to the availability in Canada and western Europe of free pre-natal care and free regular checkups that result in early detection of problems. It's an example of how the simple availability of care is more effective than sophisticated procedures to deal with illness well after it appears.

      Not for six months anyway.

      It varies by province. In Ontario, the residency requirement is 3 months. But the point is that health insurance is guaranteed regardless of medical condition. In the U.S. laid off employees who apply for personal insurance will be denied if they have a pre-existing health condition. This problem is a particular concern for older employees who would naturally have a higher incidence of health problems.

      Monopolies are generally bad for the consumer.

      The usual economic formulas don't apply to health care, nor should they. Health care is heavily regulated because consumers cannot be expected to know enough to make an informed choice everytime they choose a physician, a medical procedure or go to an emergency room. Hospitals and physicians in no sense compete for customers.

      It's significant that the only reason laid-off workers have any medical coverage is because of federal regulation. Under the free market model, insurance companies simply raised premiums or denied coverage to people for the sole reason that they lost their job. The fact that this process makes some kind of economic sense in no way justifies it.

      It is the same with health insurance. The objective is delivery of health care to sick people, not the efficient running of a business. A profitable insurance company at the expense of a high infant mortality rate is skewed set of values for sure. I believe you used the term "barbaric".

  17. Practical? by TimButterfield · · Score: 1

    The larger a company becomes, the less practical it is to move en mass. It is one thing to move a headquarters. It is quite another to try to move and/or replace the entire staff and risk loss of intellectual assets.

  18. It's about time by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Anyone who's ever been to / lived in San Fran. or San Jose and seen the insane suburban population density there knows that those cities have some major disadvantages despite the wonderful weather. Some people like it, but for many, it's just not their style. Also the cost of living there is downright ridiculous compared to say.. the mid-west or north-east US.

  19. Then take back Teleglobe please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their fat-assed sales dorks just stand around "Bistro! Bistro!" in the Reston Town Center driving away hot women and babbling about how great Canada and New York are.

    Damn it! Canadians go home or go to New York city, where the girls are fat and the boys have titties.

  20. Eh? by csbruce · · Score: 1

    Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot.

    That's a myth, eh? Only blue-collar workers ever say "eh?", eh? It was all a marketing coup for Bob & Doug, eh? Hook, line & sinker, Buds, that's what it's aboot, eh?

    1. Re:Eh? by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I live in coastal Florida and work for an ISP. We get a lot of 'snow birds' from Canada, and it is not uncommon to hear them say both 'aboot' and 'eh?'. I won't dispute your word, but I wouldn't figure blue-collar people would typically be able to move to Florida for four months during the winter.

    2. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky not Australia.
      At school, punctuating your sentences with er, um, or ahhhh, eh, or a cliche, would earn a whack with a cane. Don't believe they do nowadays. Pity really, if our broadband charges were not 30 times as expensive as US, we might be an option. (from 18cents a megabyte to 6 cents a megabyte - no unlimited shit out here).

    3. Re:eh? by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      I have several friends in the mechanical, electrical, and aeronautic engineering programs up there. Being from Northern Wisconsin, not a whole lot of culture shock- but the accent does become more pronounced after a 4, 5-year stint.

      The thing that always surprises people about the "up north" culture is the completely up-front nature people have with each other. It's a lot like Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress- people with bad manners and completely introverted tendencies tend to be shunned. For most people, learning how to say "hello" to total strangers is their first big step into cultural assimilation. Is it the same with you?

    4. Re:eh? by cuteduo · · Score: 0
      Definately a culture shock for me when I attended up there, being somewhat of an introvert. That changed pretty fast and I enjoyed the laid back and trusting attitude of the people there. Our house that I lived in and many of my friends' places were never locked and neither were our cars. Try doing that in Detroit, St. Louis, etc. Talk about a low crime rate!!

      The negatives of living up there (there weren't too many) were no major cities close by. Marquette, MI was 1.5 hours, Sault Ste. Marie was 4 hours (?) and Green Bay, WI or Duluth, MN were 6 hours.

      One of the neat things was hitting the radio scan button to find a radio station while travelling from Houghton, MI to Mackinaw City, MI. There were parts where the radio would continuously scan! At least one place the radio would do this was 90-100 miles long.

      Anyways, a bit off topic ;)

  21. What th--?! by daeley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    from the they're-not-even-a-real-country-anyway dept.

    What is this? Editor-troll-and-flamebait day?

    In any case, the movie industry here in sunny SoCal has had this problem for a long time, which is why a lot of productions have been moving up to non-sunny Canada.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:What th--?! by dhamsaic · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's from the movie South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut. More specifically, it's from the song "Blame Canada", which, as the title implies, blames Canada for the problems of the world. It is said between song lines by one of the bystanders in the movie.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    2. Re:What th--?! by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      It's a SouthPark reference.

      -Peter

    3. Re:What th--?! by americanFatCat · · Score: 1

      It's actually an allusion to South Park the movie. In the movie the crazed mothers of the south park kids start an anti-canada hate group leading to world war 3 and the rise of satan. As you can probably guess, the editor was using this allusion not to insult canada, but rather the opposite.

      Or maybe i give him too much credit, and you're right.

    4. Re:What th--?! by Glytch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And even more specifically, it's a phrase spouted by a seperatist politician in Quebec, shortly before the South Park movie was finished. I think Matt and Trey did careful research.

    5. Re:What th--?! by quarter · · Score: 1

      Its not a "real" country. Its part of the british commonwealth. The top of the governmental food chain is the queen. Or atleast the queen's representative here (Governer general? naw that cant be it).

      Of course, I could be misremembering my grade 9 social studies. that was a long long time ago, and i slept through most of it.

    6. Re:What th--?! by georgep77 · · Score: 0

      non-sunny??? In the summer months we get 15 hours of daylight. This saves the production crews big bucks.

      Cheers,
      _GP_

    7. Re:What th--?! by csbruce · · Score: 1

      I'd assume that's a Simpsons quote.

      Funny, I could swear that the sun's out right now. And it's a balmy -1C.

    8. Re:What th--?! by jordan_a · · Score: 2

      Well we are a independant member of the British Commonwealth. Yes the Queen is the head of state, but she has now power, and no new law passed in Britian applies to Canada without Canada consenting. More info here

    9. Re:What th--?! by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      No, that's where Homer calls Canada ``America Junior'' :-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    10. Re:What th--?! by daeley · · Score: 2

      non-sunny??? In the summer months we get 15 hours of daylight. This saves the production crews big bucks.

      Dude, we get 15 hours of daylight in the *winter* months here. ;)

      And anyhow, production companies get to pay in Canadian dollars, which would save any American big bucks.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    11. Re:What th--?! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Every day is Editor-troll-and-flamebait Day here at Slashdot Dot Org!

      Incidentally, the dept. line was a reference from the South Park movie.

    12. Re:What th--?! by daeley · · Score: 2

      Should have known some it was some obscure, highly intelligent literary allusion. ;D

      <muttering-to-self>Should I start a South Park is insanely moronic flameware? Should I? Naw, never mind. Substitute allusion to earlier huge story today, instead.</muttering-to-self>

      Hey, if I get a subscription to /. can I block dept. phrases? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    13. Re:What th--?! by Lictor · · Score: 2

      >The top of the governmental food chain is the queen

      Actually, thats not quite correct. H.M. The Queen is our Head of State.

      The Right Honourable J. Chretien is our Head of Government.

      Personally I'd put the head of government at the top of the 'governmental food chain'.

      The Governor General acts in right of Her Majesty the Queen in Canada. And surprisingly has a fairly scary amount of power (e.g. ability to dissolve parlaiment)... though is never able to actually exercise that ability since it would cause an obscene public outrage. It is there though.. just ask Lord Byng ;)

    14. Re:What th--?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hell, if you go a little further north, you can get 6 months of uninterrupted sunlight (and then 6 months of uninterrupted nighttime).

    15. Re:What th--?! by csbruce · · Score: 1

      I'd assume that's a Simpsons quote.

      Oops, South Park.

    16. Re:What th--?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and somehow Quebec *is* a real country? Pahlease! Maybe when they grow enough balls to actually declare independence. 60% of the population doesn't want it. The PQ should make the declaration without a mandate. That would be hysterical!

    17. Re:What th--?! by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

      When I went to Toronto, they told us they often did films there, but they needed ot make the streets look like streets in the US. One of the things they did to do this, was throw extra rubbish on the ground, and then clean it up afterwards.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    18. Re:What th--?! by nexthec · · Score: 1

      they shoot witchblade in Vancover....but they have to clean all the needles up in the allys first ;->

    19. Re:What th--?! by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      No such thing as the "British Commonwealth" anymore, just the "Commonwealth". The "British" part got dropped many many moons ago.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    20. Re:What th--?! by Esgaroth · · Score: 1

      Just for the fun of it:

      And that "scary amount of power" is what makes sure we avoid things like the Nov 2000 US Elections. If there's a question as to who has won an election the GG decides, end of story. (Ok, the loser might try the courts, and be promptly shown the constitution, and Quebec'll figure some way to use the "notwithstanding" clause to make the loser win in Quebec unless the GG picked their (gov't's) favourite).

      The other thing that that "scary amount of power" does is keep the dictators at bay. Anyone attempting a coup should get his hand slapped by a righteously outraged GG (and if the GG doesn't do it the Monarch most likely will, backed by the rest of the commonwealth).

      The US has it's checks and balances in gov't, which don't seem to apply to corps. Canada has a citizen with absolute power that they're not allowed to use, but hopefully will if other's try to take it from them.

    21. Re:What th--?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was only in reference to one film I believe (The French Connection from what I remember) and that was comparing Toronto (one of the cleaner north american cities of her size) to New York City, much larger and the setting of that movie being in seedier areas of the city was one of the dirtier cities of North America.

    22. Re:What th--?! by Lictor · · Score: 1

      Well put! Such is the benefit of a pseudo-'constitutional monarchy'.

  22. Rural IT Options by Nameis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It will be interesting to see if some IT companies will move from the urban meatspace to the more rural areas of the US. The office space is *much* cheaper and it provides a safer environment, especially post 9/11.

    Shameless Plug: rural communities with bandwidth can be found. Two I work in can be found at:

    http://www.bowmannd.com

    http://www.hettingernd.com

    1. Re:Rural IT Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The office space is *much* cheaper and it provides a safer environment, especially post 9/11.

      The cities are no more or less safe now than they were on September 10th. Just get over it.

    2. Re:Rural IT Options by mr_death · · Score: 3, Funny
      Shameless Plug: rural communities with bandwidth can be found. Two I work in can be found at: http://www.bowmannd.com

      Checking the weather in balmy Bowman, ND, I find a temperature of 8 degrees F, with a wind chill of -4 degrees F.

      You can call me a wimp if you want, but I don't really like freezing my ass off, even if office space goes for $1/sq ft and I get a free DS3 to my house.

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    3. Re:Rural IT Options by Pii · · Score: 2
      While I share your sentiment that people need to go about their business, and the world's "threat" level has remained the same (people are simply aware of it now), the previous poster is correct.

      The best way to reduce the threat to any given location is to dilute the target's attractiveness to would-be terrorists.

      If businesses would stop perpetuating the myth that their legitimacy in the marketplace is dependany upon their maintaining a corporate presence [in|on] [Silicon Valley|Madison Avenue|the Technology Corridor|Wall Street], these locations would be less attractive to terrorist organizations.

      Aside from the "security" mindset that has resulted from 9/11/01, it simply makes good business sense for corporations to move, or at least expand into, less populated, less developed areas, as the article points out. (How this "data" could be interpreted as anything other than "obvious," I'll never understand.)

      Gateway figured it out quite a while ago... In this interconnected age of unrestricted communication, corporate web-prescence, on-line ordering, and overnight shipping, does it matter in the slightest where you happen to be in the meat-space? Hell no. It all looks the same through a web browser.

      Build your campus where the land is cheap, bring the bandwidth in, and relish the low cost of living, and the 10 minute commute.

      If anything, this aritcle should be modded "redundant."

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    4. Re:Rural IT Options by Nameis · · Score: 1

      Try wearing pants. That helps.

    5. Re:Rural IT Options by sunhou · · Score: 2

      The cold weather ensures that you will stay inside and get the most out of the afore-mentioned bandwidth.

      I've gotta say, I've been living in a pretty rural area (Cornell) for the past 7 years, and it's great having a 5-minute commute past fields and greenhouses on the way in to campus. Plus Roadrunner internet/cable works great and practically never goes down (it's gone out maybe 1 or 2 hours per year at most, during the past few years). I'm really gonna hate to leave.

    6. Re:Rural IT Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>If businesses would stop perpetuating the myth that their legitimacy in the marketplace is dependany upon their maintaining a corporate presence [in|on] [Silicon Valley|Madison Avenue|the Technology Corridor|Wall Street], these locations would be less attractive to terrorist organizations.

      Um have you ever BEEN to Silicon Valley (hint, SF is not part of it)? There is no center, it is just a boring melange of office parks and suburbia, streching for as far as the eye can see. Makes a pretty lame 'terrorist' target. What are you going to target? The Intel HQ on Montague? The spread of Cisco buildings in Milpitas and San Jose? The Apple building off 280? Sand Hill road? Stanford?

    7. Re:Rural IT Options by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Checking the weather in balmy Bowman, ND, I find a temperature of 8 degrees F, with a wind chill of -4 degrees F.

      Interesting, checking the weather in Ottawa, ON, the temperature is -2C (28F) with a wind chill of -7C (19F). Of course, Vancouver has a much milder winter climate than Ottawa.

    8. Re:Rural IT Options by warpSpeed · · Score: 1

      And with a 1/2 dozen servers (preferably big Dells) you will not have to worry about heating your house either.

      Who would want to leave the house when you can cache up all of /. on your on your DS3 (with out the ads, of course) and stay roast toasey next to your big pipe?

    9. Re:Rural IT Options by Pii · · Score: 2
      Try to connect the dots, in a figurative, if not literal, sense.

      My point is that we, as a nation (and the same can be said of the rest of the world), are far better served by avoiding these dense pockets of population, or industry.

      Sam Kinison once told a joke about starving Ethiopians... His solution to their plight was for them to "Go Where The Food Is!"

      We, both people and corporations, should "Go Where The Space Is."

      (And to answer your question, yes, I have been to Silicon Valley, and having once been a bay Area resident (I can spell BART), I know full well that San Francisco is not part of it.)

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  23. Columbus, OH....great place..... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Columbus, where I live, is a great place for this. We have a decent bus system, lots of shopping places, and lot's of office space. There are alot of call centers here and lots of 18-20 year old's because of Ohio State, Franklin University, DeVry, Keller Graduate School, Capital, Otterbien and Mount Vernon Nazerene College are here also. Columbus is also one of Ohio's most wired cities with a decent penetration of broadband (available almost city wide I believe.). Rent's for workers can range from cheap to exhorbitant. You can, if you can afford it, even buy a condo downtown in Miranova (starting aroun $300,000). Miranova is for that executive who doesn't like to put a lot of miles on thier Beamer (right downtown). In any case, Ohio in general is a good place for high tech (at least that's my feeling anyway!).

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by jafac · · Score: 2, Troll

      and, as a bonus, Columbus is the only major city in Ohio that does not stink of urine!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by zoomba · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's in the middle of one of the most boring, empty and pointless states in the US... (yes, I have spent considerable time on OH, even in Columbus and Westerville which is a town just outside of the suburbs of Columbus)

      Ohio... where on the turnpike, the Toledo exit is ALWAYS 9 miles away...

      -Z

    3. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by SilLumTao · · Score: 1
      and, as a bonus, Columbus is the only major city in Ohio that does not stink of urine!

      ... but Cincinnati has the "wild" cows.

      --
      "He was a wise man who invented beer." -- Plato
    4. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Boring huh? We have the Columbus Blue Jacket's in the NHL, The Bengals and Browns in the NFL (Hey never said they were good), the Indian's and Red's in baseball, Cedar Point (coaster capital of the us if not the world), Paramount's Kings Island, Six Flags, Lake Erie(home to many cool islands), Cleveland home of the ROCK AND ROLL hall of fame....boring Ohio is NOT! Just because we DON'T have nice ocean land, lot's of place to gamble(there are some in Cincy area), or a WHOLE LOT OF Tourist Traps like Florida doesn't mean it's boring! Our quarter is being minted now and their are 4 quarter's on the shuttle now two of which will be on display at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Oh and I almost forgot NASA's John Glenn Space Center where if your above 18, you can go stand in a wind tunnel. Ohio is only BORING if all you do is sit on your ass in a hotel room. Sure, we probably aren't all that well known in the world picture, but I don't believe we are boring.

      --

      Gorkman

    5. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... the smell of cow shit covers it up pretty well...

    6. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by Cheesemaker · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Columbus is actually getting better, for the most part. I've been here six years, and the Arena district has blossomed, along with the Short North getting more interesting. Of course, Ohio State's off campus area is getting razed and replaced with a strip mall. But overall, the town's growing and improving...

  24. Interesting by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Recently in Canada one of the hot topics of discussion is about the "brain drain" to the US, where IT grads were moving to California for employment due to low taxes and a stronger US dollar (although supposedly we're doing quite well with educated immigrants). Still it would be interesting to see how many of these workers (or even companies) are Canadian or have strong Canadian connections already.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Interesting by Sakhmet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interestingly, the "Brain Drain" has also been called a hoax. It seems lately that a lot of skilled American workers are moving up here to follow the companies that are moving up here. Especially since Ontario has been named the most cost-effective place in North America to do business.

      And Canada is generally considered (I don't actually support this opinion) a "better" place to live than most other countries.

      Sakhmet.

      --
      Ban the Nukes! Save the Whales! Screw it. Nuke the Whales!
    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know Canada is screwed when people are moving to California to find lower taxes!

    3. Re:Interesting by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Informative
      > Interestingly, the "Brain Drain" has also been called a hoax. It seems lately that a lot of skilled American workers are moving up here to follow the companies that are moving up here. Especially since Ontario has been named the most cost-effective place in North America to do business.

      At the height of the "Brain Drain" (Canada-to-US migration of skilled workers), Ontario was governed by a socialist party and had marginal tax rates about 10-15% higher than its current rates (umm, and in conjunction with the tax hikes, welfare benefits doubled, and the commie bastards in power were confused as to why they'd gone to record deficits for the duration of their rule). British Columbia was in a similar mess.

      Both parties were swept out of office in landslide elections (Ontario about 6 years ago, BC more recently) and neoconservative governments were put in place with aggressive tax-cutting policies.

      Federally, Canada had a debt-to-GDP ratio of about 70%, and similarly high taxes. (Canadian tax brackets weren't indexed for inflation when inflation was under 3% -- as such, there was tremendous bracket creep). In this case, the party in power didn't change, but its policies did, largely due to the actions of a reasonably-clued Finance Minister.

      Canada appears to have done the right thing - cut taxes, cut spending, foster growth. But 10 years ago, there was no light at the end of the proverbial tunnel, and in a move reminiscent of "Atlas Shrugged", many Canadians simply gave up on their country and came to the States to seek their fortunes in the dot-com boom.

      Of course, the dot-com implosion is the largest factor in people migrating from California to cheaper jurisdictions, but at the rate US legislation is going, a "reverse Brain Drain" may well take place in a few years.

    4. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Up here in Vancouver the "reverse brain drain" is already happening. It is really hard to find a tech job here due to all the Americans moving here to work. We have better weather than most of the US, better scenery, better health care, and now lower taxes. I just hope our government makes it just as hard for americans to come here and take our jobs as it has been for me to go down to the US in the last few years.

    5. Re:Interesting by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > You know Canada is screwed when people are moving to California to find lower taxes!

      Yeah, but you know California's even more screwed when they all move back home for the same reason!

    6. Re:Interesting by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      But 10 years ago, there was no light at the end of the proverbial tunnel, and in a move reminiscent of "Atlas Shrugged", many Canadians simply gave up on their country and came to the States to seek their fortunes in the dot-com boom.
      Bt then, the dot-com boom went bust...
  25. The high cost of the world's best talent by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2

    Yup, the Bay Area is expensive. You get the world's best array of tech talent in a 100 mile radius. Thats going to cost you.

    1. Re:The high cost of the world's best talent by haus · · Score: 3, Funny

      And on the bright side you can talk to most of them as they wait in line at the unemployment office.

    2. Re:The high cost of the world's best talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the tech types you find in the unemployment lines here are HTML "programmers" and J2EE "engineers."

      Sorry in advance to that 2% of the unemployed people who actually had real jobs.

    3. Re:The high cost of the world's best talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother, when you can get a much larger group of equally talented people in Southern Ontario in a much larger area for a much lower average cost? I find it ironic that it is the Americans who cannot deal with the concept of "competition".

    4. Re:The high cost of the world's best talent by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
      Why bother, when you can get a much larger group of equally talented people in Southern Ontario in a much larger area

      Duh! The whole point of the Bay Area is that they are all in driving distance! The more spread out the talent is, the worse it is, not better. Its the concentration specifically that makes the Bay Area better for business.

      And no, So. Ontario does not have more talent - I grew up there, I know it well. The Canadian brain drain is real - they are all down here.

  26. Quite a long hop by GSV+NegotiableEthics · · Score: 1

    I live in London, UK, and four of the six companies I have worked for over the past three years were US-owned.

  27. The burbs by DCram · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live, work and play in a high tech burb. Just outside of Boston but in the tax free state of New Hampshire. When I first moved to this area it was great. Tons of high tech, low rent and tons of people just like me who had just moved into the area. After 4 years I will say that everything has changed. With all the high tech moving in the rent has jumped up 4-800 dollars for a two bedroom and the jump is even higher for a 1 bedroom for some reason.

    I guess the moral to this rant is that no matter where you go to after a while its the exact same as where you left. The small town life doesnt remain the small town life for long as soon as the town fathers realize that they can make tons of cash off the tech industry.

    I cant wait for the days where a high speed access point and a video phone are all you will need and you can work from anywhere.

    --
    If I were only smart enough to accomplish the things I dream about.. Or maybe too dumb to care.
    1. Re:The burbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point of the burbs: once you both live and work in the burbs, it is no longer the burbs.

      If you work is in what used to be considered the burbs, you now can move even farther away from "downtown" and still have a short commute.

    2. Re:The burbs by iie1195 · · Score: 1

      I cant wait for the days where a high speed access point and a video phone are all you will need and you can work from anywhere.

      I wish. Due to the unemployment rate of high-tech workers atm, less and less are given the opportunity to work from home because you're so god-damn easy to replace.
      The whole situation bites. I want the .com's back!

    3. Re:The burbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all that time that you have lived there, with a stable job, cheap rent etc... Why have you not bought a home? That would insulate you somewhat from the increasing costs of rent wouldn't it?

  28. Please move to Indianapolis by charnov · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a tech worker who has (recently) endured lack of jobs in this sector, I plead to come here. The cost of living is very low, we have Purdue, IU, and Rose-Hulman, the NCSA is right down the road, the Internet2 has a main artery here, and God knows we need more tech-savvy people here. We'll even change to daylight savings time for ya...honest.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    1. Re:Please move to Indianapolis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right... If we change the clocks, who's gonna tell the chickens when to crow?

      This state's brain is stuck in neutral, the car's got no brakes, and we're rolling backwards.

  29. follow the baby boomers by jptwo · · Score: 1

    hmmm... i can't say that i'm raring to move from SF to baltimore (lowest op-cost US city, according to the ref), despite the tough job climate in the bay area.

    however, companies might find plenty of gracefully aging but eminently employable geeks in those US states to which many baby boomers are retiring: florida, arizona and new mexico come to mind.

    the op costs would be low *and* part of the tech population might be enthused about relocating.

    1. Re:follow the baby boomers by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      i can't say that i'm raring to move from SF to baltimore
      And I can't say I'm raring to more from Baltimore to SF. So there. :-)
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  30. Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by linux+slacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's funny that the article mentions Toronto as a viable relocation for high-tech companies - Toronto is generally considered as the most expensive city in Canada, followed by Vancouver.

    Calgary is attractive to employees because unlike most of Canada, there is no provincial sales tax, only federal sales tax (so they end up paying only 7% on everything they buy, as opposed to 15% like Ontario and the eastern provinces).

    One major centre which is not mentioned in Montreal - which is incredibly cheap compared to the other major urban centres in Canada. It's generally cheaper Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Ottawa in almost every category for employees (rent, car insurance, food, beer...) Only problem is that Quebec has a high rate of provincial tax, so maybe it factors out a bit in the end.

    --
    "Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson, 1801
    1. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Montreal also has insane requirements in terms of language laws. Regardless of whether you're an "English" company or not, at a certain size all of your internal documentation must be primarily in French. Signage, business cards, web sites, etcetera all must be in French, with the French words larger than English if you *must* put any English.

      Montreal is great for social life; Fashion, food, alcohol, entertainment, Jazz...

      Toronto is really the Internet hub of Canada; Yes, the rent is sick high (houses are insane too) but it's a thriving head-office high-tech location. Lots of brains in Toronto.

      Ottawa is where the Venture Capital is. Pretty much most of it, aside from a small pocket in Toronto. It's a bleak lifestyle in Ottawa, but the money is there.

      I'd avoid Quebec if you were a corporation. Hell, I'd avoid Quebec if you like being treated like a human (and are English).

    2. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you're getting your facts, but the cost of living in Montreal is higher than the cost of living in Ottawa, aka Silicon Valley North.

    3. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > One major centre which is not mentioned in Montreal - which is incredibly cheap compared to the other major urban centres in Canada. It's generally cheaper Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Ottawa in almost every category for employees (rent, car insurance, food, beer...) Only problem is that Quebec has a high rate of provincial tax, so maybe it factors out a bit in the end.

      If you have more than 50 employees, and French isn't the official language of your workplace, you're fined.

      If you immigrate and try to have your kids placed in an English school, you can't. Your kids will be educated in French, or not at all.

      If you have a sign on your building that's in English, you get fined. If you have both English and French, you still get fined unless the French print is "predominant" (usually means "at least 50% larger").

      Montreal is part of Quebec, which is governed by a bunch of wannabe ethnic-cleansers. It's off the list of business jurisdictions for good reason.

      Given the choice between setting up business in Montreal and eating a mile my own shit, I'd be straining over a plate, fork and spoon in hand.

    4. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec is also pretty bad on thier French only signs bylaws if you only know English. I wouldn't want to live nor work there.

      Ottawa is okay, but boring. It is about 2 hours to real night life and good bar scenes.

    5. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Montreal is part of Quebec, which is governed by a bunch of wannabe ethnic-cleansers. It's off the list of business jurisdictions for good reason.
      The ethnic cleansing is mostly the fact of english canada, who have virtually eliminated the french from outside Québec.

      Québec language laws are there only to insure that immigrants don't get the notion that they can expect to be living in Québec without knowing french.

    6. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > The ethnic cleansing is mostly the fact of english canada, who have virtually eliminated the french from outside Québec.

      Explain to me what law in English Canada imposed fines and jail time on those who spoke French.

      > Québec language laws are there only to insure that immigrants don't get the notion that they can expect to be living in Québec without knowing french.

      "We don't hate the niggers, we just want to make our communities safe for white people."
      - Actual quote from some KKK goon on a talk show.

      Take your Quebec nationalism and shove it up your pur-laine ass.

  31. We already do by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    In fact, of the people in the ISD (aka IT) department where I work, almost half are Canadians (some are dual citizens like me).

    Have another Molson's on me. I'll have a lite cider, in a litre bottle.

    Will in Seattle

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  32. Makes sense by Blue+Aardvark+House · · Score: 1

    Remember, profit is revenues less cost. There's nothing wrong with a business leaving a city to reduce fixed overheads.

    The only problem is getting your workers to move, and if they don't, finding new workers to replace the old ones. Smaller cities have smaller labor pools.

    The bottom line: Lowering your rent is always good, but in the case of workers, you get what you pay for, sometimes.

  33. Re:It's True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats funny. i live just over the border from you. Everytime I go over there, I become 60% poorer. But as a consoloation, I become 200% better educated, and 1000% smarter.

    If you stopped smoking crack, you might not have such strange ideas about 'smart americans' lol.

  34. What's the price of doing business? by joeytsai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apparently, either subscriptions or big ads. =)

    --
    http://www.talknerdy.org
  35. Another reason for Wil Wheaton to..... by Lawmeister · · Score: 2

    'Blame Canada'

    he's already knocked us for taking some of the film industry (ok, he's not the only one.... but remember they created Hollywood in California for the good weather - now with the smog in LA they can't shoot much anymore)

    then there is the whole Hockey thumping... (damnit it's our sport anyways! :) but he was gracious enough to put up ar ereally nice post after the fact...

    and lastly there are those damn 'Canadian Cold Fronts' that make it snow in Texas... yes definately BLAME CANADA!

    ah.... all better now
    have a great weekend all!

    :)

    1. Re:Another reason for Wil Wheaton to..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they created Hollywood in California for the good weather

      No, they created Hollywood in California because they wanted to get away from the stranglehold that Thomas Edison had on the film industry in New York. Sort of like the MPAA has on the viewing public now...

    2. Re:Another reason for Wil Wheaton to..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Hollywood was born out of a desire to be as far away from Edison, who lived in N.J. and owned the patents on the first-generation film projector. At least that's how it was explained to me in the only non-PE class I got an A in in college: Movie Appreciation. Now if only I can remember what the CPU does again... :)

  36. To put things in perspective by ffa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just a quick note: I am from Canada (Vancouver) and right now a US dollar gets you Cdn$1.592, which means company A who would pay employee XX US$70,000, can pay the employee Cdn$70,000 which is US$43,970 and save a grand total of $26,030. The employee would be totally happy, as the cost of living here is almost 1:1 when compared to most high tech centres in the States (ala Seattle, etc...) and the standard of living is just the same, if not higher, less traffic, beautiful nature and so on. As for education level, good universities here have the same level of education as good universities anywhere else, and due to the multicultural nature of Vancouver, there is a lot of talent that migrates here from other countries...

    So all in all, it would be a win-win situation for them... and it has the same time-zone as LA, Seattle, San Fran and so on (as opposed to going over seas which makes for a development nightmare! I have been through it, working with UK/Ireland - from Vancouver, and let me tell you it is NOT my idea of fun :)

    peace.

    -farshad

    --
    ...and remember in your brain boggle, wrong starts with a wubble-u.
    1. Re:To put things in perspective by Synn · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but if you think high tech workers are going to migrate to Canada if it means earning 70k Can when they used to earn 70k US, you're off your rocker.

    2. Re:To put things in perspective by Narsindal · · Score: 1

      I remember reading a Vancouver business article a couple of years ago. It basically stated that Vancouver is a great location for businesses due to the fact that employees will take less salary to work in such a beautiful city. That's like saying that you should accept less money to live in LA, cause hey, it's LOS ANGELES. I suppose some might go for it but Vancouver isn't all that cheap as far as Canadian cities go. I certainly wouldn't take a pay cut because I get to live in beautiful Vancouver. I suppose it's more obvious to someone finishing university. The starting salaries aren't that hot in Vancouver so I'd certainly go somewhere else to make more money. Even Victoria would be better - same salary but lower cost of living.

    3. Re:To put things in perspective by jbf · · Score: 2

      By that logic, it'd be even cheaper to move to Russia, where you could pay 70k rubles = $2255.88 USD, and save a grand total of $67,744.12. The employee would be totally happy, since the cost of living in Russia is so low, and the nature there is beautiful too.

      Incidentally, in Canada, how much do you pay for gas? $1? That sounds reasonable. What? It's per LITRE?

      Furthermore, I simply don't buy that Canadian cost of living is 59.2% less, especially after all those taxes.

      Admittedly, with socialized health care, companies might save a bit on fringe, but their employees will pay it directly in GST and PST.

    4. Re:To put things in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're out of a job for the last six months, you don't have much of a choice.

    5. Re:To put things in perspective by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Did you gap out on the 1:1 thing? C$70K puts your purchasing power within Canada at about the same level as U$70K does in the USA.

      In other words, a Canuck with $70K will purchase a home, car, vacation, food, entertainment, and retirement plan that's very much the same as what an American with $70K will purchase.

      But in Canada, he'll get better air quality, less violence, reduced crowding, better beer, and be welcomed by people in other nations.

      Seems like a better deal to me. :-)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    6. Re:To put things in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble is once you leave its is tough to come back (at least getting the same $$$).

      "What did you make at your last job"

      "70k ... Canadian"

      "Ok here is an offer for 50K US. Look it over and sign there"

      *groan* "But I made 70K US not 6 months ago ..."
    7. Re:To put things in perspective by ffa · · Score: 1

      weel said! :) that was EXACTLY the point I was trying to make... seemed like it was missed.

      cheers

      -farshad

      --
      ...and remember in your brain boggle, wrong starts with a wubble-u.
  37. Re:It's True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure you don't get 50% richer? I'm not sure how to measure your %'ge increase in smarts, but I've got a funny feeling that it doesn't have a square root.

  38. Never understoof. by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never understood why a business would want to station itself in the Bay Area. If I pay 450k for a 3 bedroom house, it better be on 25 acres, preferably waterfront.

    These guys are MBAs and they can't figure out how to spend less money. It blows my mind.

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    1. Re:Never understoof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Availability of talent. There are more highly educated people who want to live here than anywhere else. Why these people want to live in the Bay Area is a different matter, but that's a fact.

      2. Because all the other high tech companies are here too. If you make a new super high end CPU for networking apps, all of your potential customers are here. It's hard to sell your high tech product when you're in Oklahoma.

      BTW the MBAs have indeed figured it out. Maybe they know something you don't, no offense.

    2. Re:Never understoof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUMP....a happy californian thriving, here in a great Tech Industry.

    3. Re:Never understoof. by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

      Let me guess,

      annonymous coward.... MBA, Bay area somewhere?

      Get out more, there are bright people everywhere.

      All the bright people in the world can't help you if your company can't stop hemorrhaging money.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
  39. Mass relaocations to/from CA every four years by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    This isn't anything new, Denver is filled with California expats who staffed the telco industry.

    The Bay Area in particular is about the cutting edge industries - there is already a groundswell of biotech. Once an industry becomes mature and doesn't need cutting edge talent, it should leave the area.

  40. Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    ... US immigration saying enough is enough. It wasn't a totally secretive technique by US companies to fool immigration into saying that the talent wasnt available stateside - it was, but salaries being damanded were too high. So the immigration dept was pressured into giving out more and more B1s (?) .. ie, work visas to immigrants, whether they were Indian or Canadian.

    Old hat tho. It happens (happened) in every industry. As the tech market becomes more 'bricks and mortar', the US will likely outsource much of its labour, although, as usual, not its executive staff. ;)

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by The+Evil+Troll+King · · Score: 1

      ...more and more B1s (?) .. ie, work visas to immigrants...

      I think the term you're looking for is "H1B visa". That's what most of the foreign programmers in the US appear to be here on. It grants temporary residence in the USA for something like six years, after which they have to go home.

      Steve

    2. Re:Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by UberChuckie · · Score: 0

      Actually, Canadians will use a TN Visa under the NAFTA agreement. These can be renewed on a yearly basis.

    3. Re:Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always get a T1 which I have to renew yearly and it allows me to do the odd coding job in the US no problem. Luckily I wouldn't want to live in the US anyway, so it works out well for me.

    4. Re:Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most Canadian programmers just take NAFTA visas.

    5. Re:Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1B visas are generally NOT available to Canadians as the requirements are stricter than the requirements for the TN-1 (NAFTA) work visa which are specifically for Canadians (oddly enough, the TN-1 is not valid for a Mexican even though they are also part of NAFTA - they have another special visa for Mexicans but it is a lot closer to the H1B visa)

  41. Calcualate your new salary by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a neat tool that let's you compare what your income would have to be elsewhere in order to have the same lifestyle.

    $100,000 in Oklahoma City compares to $279,000 in Menlo Park.

    I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    1. Re:Calcualate your new salary by Eppie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Home Fair calculator is wrong. All it does is multiply your salary by a fixed number and then it claims that those salaraies are equivalent in the two cities.

      Homefair does not take into account the fact that many of our costs these days are interstate or not subject to local price limitations. The number for the "cheaper" state thus does not take into account that while local goods might be cheaper, vacations are not cheaper, mail-order computers are no cheaper, etc. In other words, a million dollars worth of caviar in Austin is probably about the same as a million dollars worth of caviar in New York.

      Also, people's spending habits and the mix of luxury vs. normal, local vs. imported vs. domestic goods changes radically as income scales up and down. No single multiple can ever really reflect the difference in how far salary will go for a wide salary range.

    2. Re:Calcualate your new salary by belphegore · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoever created that calculator clearly never tried to buy a house in Menlo Park.

    3. Re:Calcualate your new salary by Watts+Martin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, actually, the HomeFair calculator does take the most important things into account, just not perfectly. It's using what's called a "cost of living index," which compares different categories of costs--rent, utilities, health care, etc.--and making the calculation based on that.

      No, it's not precise--by necessity it's using average COL values, presuming you are paying the median in all its values for everything. But it's not a bad ballpark estimate. Vacations and mail-order computers are not your most significant reoccuring expenses, are they? The most significant expense for nearly anyone is housing, followed (roughly) by utilities, transportation and local taxes. If I moved from Tampa to Santa Clara, the fact that a Titanium PowerBook is the same price in both places is immaterial. The fact that my $650/mo apartment here is an $1800/mo apartment there is very material... and that's the sort of thing that salary calculators do take into account.

    4. Re:Calcualate your new salary by Eppie · · Score: 1

      Housing shrinks as a percentage of your expenses as you earn more, making its COL differential less relevant as you earn more. Also, people buy fewer local goods as they earn more, again making COL differentials less relevant.

      COL values assume a basket of goods or typical consumer habits. These typical profiles don't actually apply to most people. Also, the goods change in the basket are different from area to area. The average person in NYC spends much more on housing than the average person in Boulder. These average people, though, are purchasing completely different housing. What is the equivalent in Boulder of a 2BR in midtown Manhattan? Is it a 2 bedroom apartment in Boulder? Perhaps it's a 3 bedroom house in the suburbs of Boulder. The COL differentials are relatively meaningless because you can never really hold all else equal and measure the difference in monetary terms

      Obviously, COL and the Homefair calculator can tell you _something_ about the difference in how expensive two cities are. My point really was that if you actually think you need to earn the numbers they claim in order to achieve the same standard of living, you are wrong.

  42. North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Here in the Research Triangle Park, home to Red Hat, IBM, Cisco, Siemens, Motorola, Alcatel, Nortel, GE Aircraft Engines, Glaxo, Bayer, Fujitsu, AstraZeneca, and smaller software and support companies - this is the WORST its been in 30 years. On a national basis our labor costs are not even above average. I tend to think that failing companies relocate regardless of the cost of labor. The bigger problem is the cost of RENT in places like the Bay Area, SF.

    1. Re:North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      I'd revise that list a bit. The "home" to Alcatel, Nortel and Fujitsu are in Dallas. IBM and Siemens list their home offices in New York. Cisco is in California; Motorola in Schaumburg, Illinois; Bayer is in Pittsburgh, Penn. RTP has many satellite offices, but none of the above companies are headquartered there. With many corporations closing remote offices, this is one of the reasons that RTP has been hit particularly hard.

    2. Re:North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know this is OT, but does anyone know where to get a breakfast burrito in the RTP area?

      TIA,

      Mike

    3. Re:North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by betis70 · · Score: 1

      >>The "home" to Alcatel, Nortel and Fujitsu are in Dallas

      Funny, I thought these were all 'foreign' companys--'home' being defined as their countyr of origin.

      Did Dallas secede from the Union again?

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    4. Re:North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual Company Homes:

      Alcatel - Velizy, France
      Nortel - Brampton, Ontario Canada
      Fujitsu - Tokyo, Japan
      IBM - Armonk New York USA
      Cisco - California
      Motorola - Illinois
      Bayer - Leverkusan, Germany

      Dunno about the others as I got bored looking them up.

    5. Re:North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      I see you're easily confused by quotation marks, in this case surrounding the word home. I thought it was understood that these were locations of the U.S. Headquarters. Back under your bridge Troll!

  43. I never looked back by AutumnLeaf · · Score: 1

    I left the Bay Area (Silicon Vally, specifically)in 1997 and never looked back. The only thing I miss are my friends.

    Goodbye insane cost of living. Goodbye nasty traffic. Goodbye techo-yuppies. Goodbye high real estate. Goodbye psycho work mentalities.

    The place I live now has everything the Bay Area had, and none of the things that completely sucked. Skiing, wineries, good restaurants, theater - the Bay Area doesn't have a monopoly on those things.

    Nice weather - that's another thing. But truth be told, the Bay Area seasons (more specifically, the lack thereof) really messed with my sense of time. So I don't miss that either.

    1. Re:I never looked back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The Bay Area does *not* have good theater! Sure some touring companies come through, but the resident theater is *awful*.

  44. Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...the fact that trying to actually get in to Canada "sucks".

    If all the high tech jobs move up that way, most Slashdot readers are gonna be working behind the counters at 7-11, unless Canada loosens its new immigration restrictions a bit.

    1. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Kwil · · Score: 2

      Did you even read the article you link to?

      The points system is based on language skills, education, and work experience.

      Tech people from America can rightfully lay claim to all three.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    2. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Yes; But have you looked at the point system itself? I have, and I've been considering canadian immigration for some time now, until the new laws were passed. Unless you have a job offer already (which often won't happen unless you can get in already...) and/or have family there, you won't qualify

      The current system requires you score at least 80 points on the assessment. I currently score 71, with maximum points for age and for work experience in my job field. Having a bachelor's degree, I get 20/25 possible points, and speaking fluently in one of Canada's official languages (English), but not the other, I get 16/20.

      Now, without a job offer, or family there, the only way I could reach 80 would be if I had a Masters Degree and spoke fluent French as a second language. And even then, 80 points is just a "maybe".

      Basically, the current system is very heavily weighted towards having existing connections in Canada already.

      More information.
      I stand by my claim.

    3. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > ...the fact that trying to actually get in to Canada "sucks [cbc.ca]".

      What could be harder than proving you have a college degree, can speak English, and a job offer? That's most of the "points" you need right then and there!

      Especially compared to the 6-7 years of hoop-jumping with INS -- an agency that seems dedicated to the propostion that terrorists can get in just fine on student visas, but technology professionals have to stick with the same job for the better part of a decade and beg for permission from a state employment agency (3-6 months), the federal department of labor (another month), then back to the INS to ask for permission to apply for a green card (between 3 months to 1 year), and then another year or two after permission's granted, to actually get the green card. Get laid off or company reorgs? Get on the next plane back home and start from scratch.

      If you've got half a brain and a degree, getting into Canada to do high-tech work is trivial.

      INS incompetency has made it clear that high-tech workers are neither wanted nor valued in the States.

    4. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Read my other comment. I have a college degree and speak english, and still don't have enough points to qualify.

      Yes, maybe a few months ago it would have been a cakewalk to get into Canada, but not anymore.

    5. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Oops, forgot the part regarding the job offer.

      Good luck getting a job offer, right now. Jobs, especially tech jobs, are tight right now, and they have to offer those jobs to qualified canadian residents first, before you get the green light. Nevermind the sponsorship issues.

    6. Re:Well, except for one thing... by DebtAngel · · Score: 2

      He did mention a job offer, which would push you over 80.

      Besides, they knocked the required score back down to 70 this week, because it was deemed 80 was unfair to people who have already applied. Note that you would now be allowed in. They are going to raise it back to 80 at some point in the future.

      --

      Is this post not nifty? Sluggy Freelance. Worshi

    7. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is as it should be. Canadian jobs for Canadians first. Americans should just get in line behind the Mexicans, Chinese and Europeans.

    8. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      From a statement made Tuesday:

      The Minister is further proposing that skilled workers and business immigrants who applied before December 17, 2001 who have not received a selection decision prior to January 1, 2003, will be subject to the proposed selection criteria and a proposed transition pass mark of 70 points (reduced from 75).

      It's retroactive, only for those who have already applied, before the current law went into effect. It's true, they say they are going to change things again, in June, but there are no real specifics yet.

    9. Re:Well, except for one thing... by rudedog · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have a bachelors degree in computer science, you are entitled to get a job in Canada on a NAFTA TN visa. Yes, you need a job offer as a systems analyst to get a TN visa, but it's not difficult to do that (I did the reverse job hunting from Canada for jobs in the US and got two offers within a month). Once you have the job offer, you just present your offer letter and your degree at the border and they will issue you a TN visa.

    10. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy up. That's how it works!

    11. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to immigrate. You can work in Canada by getting a work Visa, like how Canadians get TN visas to work in the states. All this thanks to NAFTA.

    12. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh they are valued alright, just as long as they are willing to work for virtual-peanuts and go away after six years, taking all the knowledge and skills they developed to a 3rd world country.

    13. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baloney, there's not rule saying a canadian company has to hire a canadian. That sounds like some stupid INS inspired rule.

      What about Nafta Visa's, you need points for them?

    14. Re:Well, except for one thing... by SamHill · · Score: 2

      Yes, but your degree had better be in computer science, or mathematics, or something that sounds mighty techy to the average guy, or the folks at the border are going to tell you to get screwed on ice, no matter how much experience you have and how enthusiastic your potential employer is.

    15. Re:Well, except for one thing... by rudedog · · Score: 2

      In fact, it has to be in computer science, or you have to demonstrate that you have experience commensurate with a degree in computer science. However, that does not mean that it is difficult to get the visa. The NAFTA visa was deliberately designed to make it easy for Canada and US citizens (in certain occupations) to do cross border job hopping.

    16. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Besides, they knocked the required score back down to 70 this week, because it was deemed 80 was unfair to people who have already applied. Note that you would now be allowed in. They are going to raise it back to 80 at some point in the future.

      The other important distinction is that the points system can be understood by anyone.

      You download a form. You check the boxes. You have a pretty good idea of whether or not you qualify. One form. One organization. And if you're a Canadian Immigration drone, it's pretty easy to sort the "yes" and the "no" piles.

      Contrast this with the INS system.

      Dozens of statuses under which you can get in, dozens of parallel (and contradictory) regimes that say what you can do when you're here, reams of paperwork resulting in 3-6 month delays to hire people or change statuses, a maze of statuses through which one must migrate to get to the green card stage, and a green card process that throws the merit system ("best person for the job") out the window and requires a 2-3 year dance between three or four government agencies (state labor board, DOL, INS, and Department of State), and a maze of regulations that INS itself doesn't even know how to follow.

      The only people whose interests are served by the US immigration system are the bureaucrats at INS, the terrorists who sneak through the cracks, and the immigration lawyers whom companies have to hire to make sure they're in compliance.

      Ashcroft, if you or one of your goons is reading this (and we all know you are ;-), please, during your term of office, eliminate the INS and start from scratch.

    17. Re:Well, except for one thing... by synx · · Score: 2

      Good call, the canadian equivalent to the TN-1 visa... you dont need points, and they are very easy to get... IF you are in one of the designated professions.

      But you can get a TN-1 without a lawyer. Its a cakewalk. I got a TN-1 to move to Seattle, no problem.

    18. Re:Well, except for one thing... by SamHill · · Score: 2

      If you read the NAFTA, it doesn't say your degree has to be in the field. That's an interpretation you'll only find in the official handbook used by the Immigration folk.

      Also, good luck proving to a guy at the border that you're qualified to do the job without a degree in a field they recognize. They're not impressed by resumes, letters of reference or anything else.

      The first answer is always no, and once you get that answer, the chances of getting a yes are very, very slim.

    19. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under free-trade, you can walk over to Canada with a university degree in technical field and a job offer and get in for a visa (that needed to be renewed). As long as you have a job (that's the tough part), you can stay.

    20. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well what did you expect? That your Arts degree would get you a job?

    21. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are applying for PR status. That is very different from a work visa. (In fact it is much tougher to do the same thing for the US, I know because I have tried and I do have family in the US (father) )

      To get a work visa, you really only need a job offer. And if you think that our immigration officials are tough, I have found the US to be one of the most hostile and difficult countries for trying to immigrate there (H1B is not an immigration visa remember).

    22. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right about the tightness of the market right now but to get the Canadian equivelent of the TN-1, a company does NOT have to offer the job to a qualified Canadian.

    23. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cburley · · Score: 1
      Ashcroft, if you or one of your goons is reading this (and we all know you are ;-), please, during your term of office, eliminate the INS and start from scratch.

      Bush, take the same advice, substituting "IRS" for "INS" and dropping the last part.

      :)

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
    24. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INS is not incompetent when it comes to high-tech workers. The agency is doing what is was instructed to do.

    25. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Ashcroft, if you or one of your goons is reading this (and we all know you are ;-), please, during your term of office, eliminate the INS and start from scratch.
      >
      > Bush, take the same advice, substituting "IRS" for "INS" and dropping the last part.

      With the IRS, if you fuck up (read: "fail to follow one of the tens of thousands of sections of the law that you can't even comprehentd"), at least you can placate them by cutting them a check. With INS, the law is just as incomprehensible, but the consequence for fucking up is that you get detained and beaten for a week (if you're lucky, if you're not lucky, for a lifetime, and that was before 9/11), and then you pack your bags and go home.

      But yeah, we also desperately need to get rid of the Internal Revenue Code. It's the canonical example of making the law so complex that nobody knows if they're in compliance or not, and therefore everybody spends more time and money paying lawyers and CPAs for at least some reassurance.

    26. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cburley · · Score: 1
      With INS, the law is just as incomprehensible, but the consequence for [screwing] up is that you get detained and beaten for a week (if you're lucky, if you're not lucky, for a lifetime, and that was before 9/11), and then you pack your bags and go home.

      Detained and beaten for a week? I had no idea it was that bad.

      I've heard horror stories about those who got on the wrong side of the IRS, but not involving beatings AFAIK.

      But yeah, we also desperately need to get rid of the Internal Revenue Code. It's the canonical example of making the law so complex that nobody knows if they're in compliance or not, and therefore everybody spends more time and money paying lawyers and CPAs for at least some reassurance.

      Indeed. I've come to the tentative conclusion that simplicity in laws challenges the rule of tyrants, who generally prefer laws to be sufficiently complex that they can more easily get away with selective enforcement targeting their enemies.

      In that vein, while I picked on the IRS, it's difficult for me to think of an area of federal law that is not unnecessarily and excessively complicated, and tending further in that direction (DMCA and SSSCA being examples pertinent to /.)!

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  45. Just gives me an excuse by tulare · · Score: 2
    "Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot."
    I'd been meaning to leave the states anyhow. Too much willful ignorance here.
    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    1. Re:Just gives me an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and too many people willing to bitch about it.

    2. Re:Just gives me an excuse by tulare · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I do bitch. I also vote, write letters to my reps, letters to the editor, etc. The money owns the hearts and souls of too many in the US. Fuck it.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  46. Already starting - biotech boom in Bay Area by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    You can see the swell of the next boom industry - biotech, take hold in the Bay Area (and Boston).

    The Bay Area is an expensive market for expensive talent in expensive industries.

    No, you should not manufacture widgets in the Bay Area if you can do so elsewhere. The companies that are here are here becuase they need a high concentration of talent across a set of tech industries that you cannot find elsewhere in quantity.

    R&D is expensive and the Bay Area is the R&D shop for the nation (if not the world).

  47. Re:It's True - WHY THE HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell was this person given a flamebait? It was just his opinion. You moderators are freaking morons.

    I hate this stupid dicussion site. As soon as you say something that is not "in" you get modden down. I feel like I am in freaking Germany in 1942

  48. Availability of talent? by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The one problem is - a tech company is composed of talented individuals. Most of the really talented people can find good jobs within their area, so they have less incentive to move to Podunk for just their career.

    You can move the company, but if only the lower half of the talent pool follows, it's not a very good decision.

  49. What smaller cities dont provide by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1

    No knock against smaller cities but I think the need to move out becuase of higher costs will out wighed by the need to have good sushi, and good new movies.

    --

    Sigs are dangerous coy things

    1. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by mary-wanna · · Score: 0

      Heck... we get good movies in smaller cities. Matter of fact I just went and saw Tron last night, It took me a while to get there on the dirt roads cause my model-t kept getting stuck in the mud and I ran into some guy driving one of them new fangled Gremlins.

      As for sushi, we just rangle a dirty ol' catfish out of one of our three rivers and starta chompin.

    2. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by RembrandtX · · Score: 2

      You have obviously not eaten at Shogun Jpn on Charles Street.

      Or seen a film at the Senator Theatre :)

      Charles Street in Baltimore is the (more or less) "alternative-lifestyle-zone(tm)' of Baltimore.

      You want good sushi, great dance clubs, and clothing/furnature shops ? thats the place to go.

      You wanna get mugged ? go over to Security Blvd and stand still for about 30 seconds.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    3. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by alen · · Score: 2

      Smaller cities have new movies. Columbus in Georgia had a few really nice theaters and the new movies came out the same time as in NYC and LA. Only thing in NYC and LA are the preview showings 1 week prior to opening. But the ticket prices are cheaper in the smaller towns.

    4. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by jsfetzik · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough size has little to do with, or even has a reverse effect on, what ammenities you get. Most of the deployments of fiber to every home you read about are in small to medium sized towns. Good food can be found almost anywhere. As for movies, a little place called Three Oaks MI, population ~2000, has a first run art theater(http://www.vickerstheatre.com/index.html), that occasionally gets stuff before the art houses in Chicago.

    5. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Vancouver there are all-you-can-eat Sushi places for $8CDN (~$5US). Note that unlike sushi in the rest of the continent, the Salmon, crab, etc are actually caught within sight of where you eat it.

    6. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1

      well, baltimore is not exactly what I would consider a small city? But is it in-expensive?

      --

      Sigs are dangerous coy things

  50. What is wrong with coming up north? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is wrong with relocating to Canada. We are hard working, friendly people with a relatively weak economy. Movie's are always being shot in our big cities, simply because it is cheaper. So is it not a logical step to move tech companies up here too. I guess it would be a fair trade, seeing how for the past decade or so the american's have created a "brain drain" on our country. I say come on up, and maybe by the time you get settled down I will be done college and could get a job.

  51. Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canuck) by feelafel · · Score: 5, Funny
    Advantages:
    • lower fixed costs
    • have to pay less for skilled workers
    • health care is a cost savings for corporations
    • you can boast that you're a citizen of the nation with the greatest male and female hockey players
    • other nations don't have a seething hatred for you (justified or not)
    • better beer
    • funny comedians
    • really good music
    • an abundance of gorgeous people are our best kept secret
    • it's harder to get shot "by accident" here.


    Disadvantages
    • get paid less as a skilled worker;
    • almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan (which will by dry in 10-20 years)
    • only one airline, and man does it suck
    • yeah, ok - it's a little colder
    • the healthcare system is spiralling downwards due to funding shortages passed onto the provinces from a sneaky federal government that wants to report a "surplus"
    • lack of world class cities and attractions


    One thing that I find ironic is that it was only a few years ago that Nortel was threatening to leave Canada because of its taxation rates which hurt corporations trying to compete against those in the USA.
  52. Stupid hosers! by thepooleboy · · Score: 0

    dirty Canucks, first the movie industry, now IT, soon, we, I mean THEY, will complete their drive for total world domination. HAHAA HAHAHA HAAAAAA!!!

    Canadian World Domination

  53. Re:It's True -im at 50 now!!! by lemonhed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah! I finally made it too 50 KARMA!!!! Now its time to md my ass down. Mazel Tov!

  54. Re:It's True by suckwhat · · Score: 0

    Not bad, 3 anonymous cowards in a row. Yeah, OK, my math is a little shady, but the city I'm referring to is Windsor, which is like Detroit, only with a better casino and strip clubs as far as the eye can see. Not the brightest city in Canada. As far as the Northern provinces go, they can keep the snow and moose. I'll stay in Crimetown, USA! Signed, Dumb American

    --
    -------------------------------------------
    Saving baby carrots around the globe.
  55. Price of Living in Canada by lapointe · · Score: 1
    I can confirm that prices are significantly better up here on many things from cars to Internet access. This seems to be because the market will bear a much higher price in the US for consumer items. That is because Canada has roughly the same affluence as the poorest state in America.

    Significantly, real estate is a fair bit cheaper in major cities here than in the U.S. Office space is running about US$10/square foot (I think) and houses start about US$175,000 in Toronto. Taxes are somewhat higher, but you do get some mediocre health care thrown in for free. Yes, the heating bill is nasty in the winter.

    Anyway, if you are a business, these things might be a big factor.

    The downside (or upside depending on who you are) - from every salary survey I have seen, salaries here are much lower. Hard to get a handle on this, but my impression is that technical wages in U.S. are the same as Canada but in US$ (thus 40% higher?). Part of the problem is the "branch plant" factor in the Canadian economy.

    Like, at least our beer is way better, eh?

    BTW No, and we don't pronounce it "a-boot" Who started that myth?

    1. Re:Price of Living in Canada by feelafel · · Score: 1

      BTW No, and we don't pronounce it "a-boot" Who started that myth?

      Actually ... uhh .. we do. I used to do voice over work when I was a kid, and the line on which I had to do the most takes was one where my character said "No doubt about it." Eventually, I had to exaggerate to "No dowwt abowwt it" to get it sounding American.

      We don't sound like actors making fun of us, but we certainly pronounce words like "about", "roof", "doubt" very differently. We tend to put an "out" sound where Americans expect an "owt" sound.

      :)

    2. Re:Price of Living in Canada by csbruce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is because Canada has roughly the same affluence as the poorest state in America.

      That is highly doubtful. Canadians have always had a higher standard of living than Americans, and until just this year, the highest standard in the world (displaced by Denmark, I think). America is barely in the top ten.

      Honestly, so many Canadians don't seem to know how well they have it!

    3. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Lictor · · Score: 2

      >BTW No, and we don't pronounce it "a-boot" Who started that myth?

      You're correct in that we don't pronounce it 'a-boot', but we *do* tend to pronounce 'ou' as a dipthong. The trouble is that when an English speaker who is not accustomed to this phoneme hears it... their brain instinctively maps it on to the closest phoneme that they are accustomed to, which is usually 'oo'.

      There is a cute little article on the historical aspects at: http://www.m-w.com/wftw/00may/052200.htm

    4. Re:Price of Living in Canada by stilwebm · · Score: 1

      Significantly, real estate is a fair bit cheaper in major cities here than in the U.S.

      Did it every occur to you that this might have to do with the weather and location? Real eastate in costal Florida and California is more expensive because people actually desire to live there for reasons other than "that's where I have to live for my job.

    5. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "BTW No, and we don't pronounce it "a-boot" Who started that myth?"



      Someone who knew Canucks from the east coast.

    6. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yooo tawk funnah, a-huah, a-huah, a-huah!

    7. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Proud to live in the best highest rated city in the best country to do business in the world. (as rated by an american based accounting firm :-)

      I make six figures, and the mortgage on my new 3 bedroom home is about $800 a month.

      Probabally why companies like Ford have moved call centers here, and why companies like Bioware and Quicken have their main offices here.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:Price of Living in Canada by rudedog · · Score: 2

      Just to pick a nit, Bioware is located in Canada because that's where the founders lived. There was no concious decision to move to Canada.

    9. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, real-estate on the coast of Florida is much more expensive than the rest of the state. My parents' home cost nearly $100,000, and it's almost half a mile from the beach. Of course, it's on two acres, is a 5br 3.5ba house with a two-car garage, and it is nearly 45 minutes from Disney... but that's where the coast is!

    10. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was all subliminal.

    11. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That is U.N. B.S.

      They're just punishing us (the US) for not
      being socialistic enough. The US is the land
      of opportunity. That means you can fall on
      your face, too.

    12. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make six figures, and the mortgage on my new 3 bedroom home is about $800 a month.

      Ah, but do you have a big cock?

    13. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That is because Canada has roughly the same >affluence as the poorest state in America.

      The trick here is that affluence does not mean much. You can have 20 times the money but if it costs you 20 times more to live then you're not much better off. Additionally, if you get shot everytime you leave your gated estate, then you're that much worse off. Happiness is only partially dependant on money...

      So, yes Canada is poor compared to the US. But No, it doesn't really matter.

    14. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, must be nice... my rent here in Ottawa is about to go up to 900$ CDN a month.... my salary is crappy (don't even know if the company I work for is going to exist in another couple of weeks!)

      To add insult to injury, even though I have a decent skill set...(includes experience from realtime to database design and development) I can't see myself progressing in my career here in Ottawa... Don't know if its just me....
      On a good note though, hear things seem to be picking up in southern Ontario (Toronto and area)... Guess I might be heading down there and give it a try... and good riddance to the cheap companies and high rent of Ottawa!!

      That is my rant for the microsecond! Thx

    15. Re:Price of Living in Canada by csbruce · · Score: 1

      and good riddance to the cheap companies and high rent of Ottawa!!

      Good luck to you if you think that Toronto has cheaper housing than Ottawa.

  56. Joke Missed by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Oh, man, I can't believe you missed this.

    "Canada: it's not just aboot doughnuts anymore, eh?"

    Virg

    1. Re:Joke Missed by Succa · · Score: 1

      I find the accent to be a lot less like "aboot" and more like "aboat". Anyway, yeah, I know. I'm asleep at the keyboard here.

    2. Re:Joke Missed by God!+Awful · · Score: 1


      "Canada: it's not just aboot doughnuts anymore, eh?"

      You know what's funnier than a Canadian saying about? An American trying to emulate the sound of American saying about.

      Honestly, there's a specific sound that Canadians are able to distinguish that Americans can't. It sounds a bit like the word "oat". That is what Eastern Canadians say when they say out. On the other hand, Americans use a diphtong "ow" sound which, frankly, sounds to me like an expression of pain. It sticks out like a sore thumb, or a Bostoner saying the word "car".

      I find it typical of American ethnocentrism to assume that Canadians speak funny, when it is in fact Americans who hear funny.

      -a

  57. Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    If you live in the Bay Area you can change jobs twice a year for the next decade and still get off at the same bus stop. No other city in the world offers that density of opportunity.

    How many employees are going to move to JerkWater where their new employer is the only game in town??

    1. Re:Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by Chris+Parrinello · · Score: 2

      Now I remember the reason I left Silicon Valley. The only maps you could buy in SV had everything east of Sacramento marked as "terra incognito".

      I think you need to actually visit more places than your one bus stop to actually know what the state of the other high tech areas in the country are really like so you won't show your ignorance making incorrect generalizations.

    2. Re:Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by abraxas · · Score: 1
      still get off at the same bus stop

      Ha! The south bay transit grid is a mess. As an advocate of sidewalks, coffee shops you can't drive through, and efficient mass transit I was always depressed about the state of mass transit in that area.


      I lived in Mountain View for five years and the last half of that was working in a shop on Zanker. I finally realized that the reason startups were over there (and effectively off the poor transit grid) was that it was reverse commute from Los Altos Hills where all the execs lived and they love to drive their big expensive cars to work.


      Maybe the threat of tech exodus will cause some things to change but I doubt it. I'm living in another state at the moment and will be heading back eventually since for exciting startups there's nothing even remotely like it. The other thing to remember is that engineering managers and senior engineers are worth ten times their weight in junior staff and it's only the junior staff leaving the area since all the senior folks already own their homes and have to stick it out to avoid the equity loss. When things turn around you'll see all the junior people flooding back into the area (hopefully with newly minted grad degrees so we can be the senior folks next round).

    3. Re:Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not many. But plenty (judging from the makeup of the company I'm working at) would be willing to move to another area with a large and diverse (though not AS large and diverse) selection of tech companies. Like Ottawa, Toronto, Calgary, etc...

    4. Re:Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by betis70 · · Score: 1

      >>As an advocate of sidewalks, coffee shops you can't drive through

      I love it!! LOL when will they realize that sitting and talking to friends over a coffee whilst breathing in exhaust fumes just doesn't cut it? Did this last weekend with the nice weather and remembered why I like Europe for outdoor cafes--no strip mall parking lots.

      Still the Castro Street area in Mtn View is nice (I'll be moving within walking distance soon since the rest of you have all boogied out of town and left tasty empty apts), as is U Ave in PA.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
  58. Finally, some sense by BlueMonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...or should I say cents. Supply and demand, folks. What am I missing here? There's no reason whatsoever for most of these high tech companies to hang out in these high cost areas. You're jacking up the price for everyone else to live there just so you can form some geographical "high-tech band" in the US, when no industry could be farther from geocentricity than the high tech industries who've now finally gotten a clue. Take your business anywhere you can find electricity. For the price you're paying to run your company in the "high tech band" you could probably house all your employees and their families in dream homes in Iowa or someplace.

    I'm no authority, but I am just glad to see things finally evening out a bit. A town isn't meant to consist 100% of high tech profitable firms. They need teachers and "sanitation engineers" and whatnot -- the guys who don't make a zillion dollars a year to pay for the housing.

  59. baltimore city by tricker · · Score: 1

    Having done the reverse relocation, baltimore-->SF I can say that baltimore is certainly ripe for development.

    real estate costs are nil, at the current rate of population loss, baltimore will be *empty* by 2070. when i left in '98 downtown office vacancy rates were near 40%. can't vouch for industrial prices, but rent on a 1 bdrm apt. was running around $325/month in the somewhat safer neighborhoods. the city has an incredible amount of housing stock, most of which is boarded up.

    The biggest knock against progress in the city is crime, drugs, safety. It is not a safe town with lots of animosity between socio-economic groups in addition to the blind rage associated w/abject poverty. the school system is absolutely horrid.

    The combination of these two factors make for one complex situation. the city government wants and needs development but the culture of the city disallows it. want to fix up the $15,000 row house you just purchased? better post an armed guard there until you circle it with razor wire. *everything* gets stolen. reshingle your roof? the shingles will be ripped up and carted off that night. scrap metal fuels the heroin trade. most vacant houses have lost all of their wiring / plumbing for a $2 fix.

    i have countless horror stories, getting whipped by bungie cord swinging bicycle thiefs, duck and cover due to random noontime gunfire downtown, ribs stolen off a hot webster grill, blah blah blah.

    these are quality of life issues that will have to be addressed if the business world wants to reap the benefits of the low costs associated with operating here. it will be very interesting...

    1. Re:baltimore city by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The biggest knock against progress in the city is crime, drugs, safety. It is not a safe town with lots of animosity between socio-economic groups in addition to the blind rage associated w/abject poverty.

      All depends on what part of town you live in...areas like Federal Hill and Canton are being re-developed pretty successfully, and there are still upper-class enclaves within the city borders.

      And the suburbs are a different world - legally, as Baltimore City and Baltimore County are politically independant subdivisions. I'm quite happy with my cost/quality ratio in Catonsville - in Baltimore County, about twenty minutes away from downtown B-more.

      There are plenty of techies around here - many commute from Baltimore to the D.C. area, or even (shudder) Northern Virginia. There's also been a lot of growth in nearby Howard County, which is now one of the richest counties in the U.S.

      Yes, there are parts of the city where wise people do not go after dark. But that's true of any large city in the U.S. And anyone with kids who doesn't want to send them to private schools (which around here are pretty much Catholic schools) should live outside the city line - the city's public school system is very troubled.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:baltimore city by csbruce · · Score: 2

      The biggest knock against progress in the city is crime, drugs, safety. It is not a safe town with lots of animosity between socio-economic groups in addition to the blind rage associated w/abject poverty. the school system is absolutely horrid.

      But somehow Baltimore is still more attractive than Canada?

    3. Re:baltimore city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 1 bedroom for $325 huh? No kidding.

      Well, thanks for telling us why it's that low. It's pretty amazing how smart, talented workers don't like to live in cities with out-of-control crime and crappy schools for their kids.

      Shocking really.

  60. Re:blame canada? by Glytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh yeah, for sure. We got the curling too, eh? And Tim Horton's. :)

    Trust me, my fellow techies, if you ever move up here, get an apartment or house within two or three minutes walk of a Tim Horton's. You will not regret it.

  61. South Bay is f'd too for commercial properties by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Milpitas is filled with derelict Cisco buildings that are frequently squatted.

  62. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by betis70 · · Score: 1

    >>lack of world class cities and attractions

    I dunno, I think Vancouver BC beats Seattle any day of the week and Toronto is a pretty fun city.

    But maybe you don't include Seattle in the list of 'world-class cities' in which case, I'll shut up and go back to my code.

    PLus there is that Banff film dealie and you have hotties like Nelly Furtado and Pamela Anderson from there, so it can't be all bad (oh yeah and lest I forget ... HOCKEY!)

    --
    I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
  63. City of Multimedia of Montreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gov of the great country of Quebec had the idea a few years ago to create the "multimedia city" within Montreal. One word, it almost worked. They offered tax-free building just aside downtown, gave 10 years tax exemptions, paid 1/2 of the salary of every company that had move in that area instead of going anywhere else, and gave them so many advantages that even french monkeys decided to move in Quebec to develop software because of the huge expertise now available. The cost of live of barely the 1/3 of Toronto and about 1/11 of NY! We have pretty good telco in the area and our WAN is closely almost as strong as the one of Washington.

    Think about it, with 10$ us you can have 1896.75$ cnd ;ppp

  64. Microsoft Ad's on Slasdot!?! by sQu@sH · · Score: 1

    I know this is offtopic and feel free to mod it down, but has anyone else seen the MS Visual Studio .NET banners on OSDN pages. Not that I have anything against MS (well except that whole unethical business practice thing), but I know in general many /.'s are also MS bashers. Just thought it was ironic....well go back to reading more useful comments

    1. Re:Microsoft Ad's on Slasdot!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSDN will do anything for money. Including, kissing Microsoft's ass.

  65. Baltimore Business Quotes : by RembrandtX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Baltimore Big Business Quotes:

    "When we gonna get us some of that them there health care Hon ?"

    "If we could switch to Solar Panels, we would use a lots less Earl (oil)."

    "Whys that there stadium say PSI-NET? Whoz that Hon ?"

    "Yea, this heres the new business capitals, we're right between Warshington and Napolis."

    [non baltimore residents need not laugh]

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    1. Re:Baltimore Business Quotes : by coltrane99 · · Score: 1
      Ha!

      Man, I miss that Highlandtown accent!

    2. Re:Baltimore Business Quotes : by blair1q · · Score: 2

      You mean, non-bawmer residents, right?

      --Blair

    3. Re:Baltimore Business Quotes : by Fnord · · Score: 2

      What about former DC residents that were raised to make fun of Baltimorons?

    4. Re:Baltimore Business Quotes : by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum.

  66. Excellent summary (from an expat) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    To reiterate, the biggest downside for tech workers is lower wages. Forget about that $100k US (equivalent) coding position in Ottawa.

    1. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Good. Techies who work for salary alone are going to be the ones I'll hold resposible for implementing the SSSCA .....

      Work for the love, not the money. Techies are overpaid anyhow, although I will admit that they do tend to need to buy expensive toys for the home in order to stay competative in their industry as an exmplouee ....

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Forget about that $100k US (equivalent) coding position in Ottawa

      So what would be the equivalent when you adjust by cost of living and purchasing-power parity? $100k CA? $90k CA?

    3. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by aron_wallaker · · Score: 1

      >Forget about that $100k US (equivalent) coding position in Ottawa

      So what would be the equivalent when you adjust by cost of living and purchasing-power parity? $100k CA? $90k CA?

      Probably in that neighborhood. I've had plenty of tech friends move south and most of them say you need to get your salary converted from C$ to US$ straight up or better to cover the cost of living. Then again, most of these guys moved to California....my buddy who moved to Texas just laughs at all of us (no state income tax) but he grew up there so he's used to it.

    4. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by UberChuckie · · Score: 0

      From the software people I know in Ottawa, they make ~ $60k-$80k Canadian

    5. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooooo... my heart goes out to you.

      There are a lot worse jobs you can have. Go hold some, and stop whining just because you have to type all day with your thumb up your ass.

      Going to tell us food service is underpaid, too? When was the last time you voted for a tax hike because your cops are underpaid? Or the teachers around you?

      When was the last time you donated to your local health inspector? And you think your job's bad...

      Cram it, shithead. Really. Go dig ditches for a decade, and then come back and tell us whose job is less desireable...

    6. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Oh please. Poor you for tying happiness to salary. Cry me a river.

      My stress comes from the stupid requirements that are made and inept management. Actually, it's pretty much because the market asks for the impossible.

      I'll admit that techies move onto management to get salaries and less stress, but hey, no wonder management in the IT industry blows so badly.

      I've worked in this industry for 5 years, and I can tell you that I'd rather be a stressed worker doing what I enjoy rather than put myself in the line-of-fire that is management. I can't think of an easier way to get people to start disliking me.

      >Expensive needs to off-set said Stress?

      Again, sorry you equate the quest for material gain as a means of avoiding stress. Me, at the end of the day, I give the middle finger to the market, recognize that all this shit isn't that important, and abjectly refuse to comprimise my happiness for the sake of a job.

      You'd be amazed at how many managers cant say a freaking thing once you've owned a code base for a year or so, and you put your foot down when your abilities are being abused like some inhuman swiss army knife. Fuck em. If their business plan can't work without me taking it up the ass, it's a lousy business plan, and they were doomed to fail from the beginning.

      It's you who feels that just getting some more DVDS, or skydiving more, or whatever you seem to think is the solution for stress, doesn't seem to be work.

      Money doesn't give me happiness. Doing what I enjoy doing, and not compromising my working conditions is what kicks ass. Working in inhuman conditions does not justify asking for higher wages - it just makes you a sucker for working like that.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  67. Canadian $$ vs American $$ by lucky_duck · · Score: 0

    Here, on Prince Edward Island, Canada, you can hire a programmer for $12 canadian. We're having an employment boom all over the island just in call centers. Why shouldn't american companies take advantage of this? To them, we're practically giving away the work. And we're also super-friendly which helps...

    1. Re:Canadian $$ vs American $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason we won't move:

      Honestly, canadian girls are not that great in the sack.

    2. Re:Canadian $$ vs American $$ by lucky_duck · · Score: 0

      I guess you just haven't paid them enough then.

  68. It's the second amendment, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The real reason companies are moving out is me, and people like me. I've been telling every single recruiter who wants to move me to Chicago, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, or DC that I WILL NOT MOVE to a place that isn't a "shall issue" state for concealed firearms.

    Obligatory URL's Geeks with Guns and Packing.org

    1. Re:It's the second amendment, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the guns AND the criminals, stupid!

  69. So Let's See... by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Funny

    > The east says "eh", the west sounds just like Seattle.

    Okay, then, let's get this straight:


    East: "Sure, whatever, eh?"

    West: "Sure, whatever, Seattle?"


    I think I like it the Eastern way better, eh?

    Virg

    1. Re:So Let's See... by light101 · · Score: 1

      Now try with the french people from the east.

      East : "Sure, whatever, eh?"

      Weast : "Sure, whatever, Seattle?"

      Quebec : "Ouin, on s'en fou pas mal!?"

      Basicaly, . it mean who cares!

    2. Re:So Let's See... by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Hmm. French "humor." Can't say I ever cared for it enough to remove the quotes from around it...

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  70. New Hampshire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Cities like Manchester and Portsmouth are becoming tech hotbeds because of the following bennies:

    Close to Boston without the expense.

    Easier commute. Less congestion and NH drivers are not selfish bastards.

    Cheap rents. You can get a 2 bedroom apartment for as little as $700/mo. Office space is cheap too. Less regulation. NH is way more laid back than MA is in the area of business regulation. * No income tax. No sales tax. Taxes are generally low except property taxes in rural areas.

    Incentives by Gov. Shaheen. to entice tech companies to NH.

    Sundial Avenue in Manchester is Telco central. Gobs of fiber avalable!

    Home to companies like PC Connection and Tyco.

    The lifestyle here is cool too. If you live in Manchester, the mountains (camping, skiing) is an hour away. The beach is 40 min away from Manchester too. The people here are alot more laid back than in MA.

    - mindstom posting as AC because he can't find his password.

    1. Re:New Hampshire by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I looked at Manchester until I saw the city, what a dump. Nashua isn't much better, residents call it "Trashua". Portsmouth is nice but is well on its way to becoming as expensive as any Boston suburb.

      I wonder if it'll be home to Tyco for much longer. ;)

      NH drivers are maniacs, least the ones that blow by me at 90 are.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:New Hampshire by humanasset · · Score: 1

      You are right about Portsmouth being expensive.

      The housing market is one of the most expensive in the United States.

  71. Teleglobe = = sinking ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that sinking ship will be gone soon enough, along with their coked-up and drunken "sales" staff

    they are the data equivelant of a dot.bomb anyway.

  72. Standard Corprate Mode, move by just+someone · · Score: 1

    Standard mode of operation for corporations moving to Texas. Move to Texas, dismantle corporation.

    Move, offer bonus's to people for move. Say move is because it's easier to get to both coasts for the sales people.
    People who moved train the local help. Can people who moved.

    Real reason to move is that it's easier to:
    1) Can people in Texas
    2) Blatanly flaunt corporate laws that other states put in to protect people from what happens in Texas.
    3) Flaut US laws, it's closer to the Bahamas.

    1. Re:Standard Corprate Mode, move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ignorance of Texas law is astounding.

      There are tax loopholes, as there are everywhere, but the rest of your statements are ludicrous.

  73. South Carolina!!! by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1
    The last three excuses for governors we've had down here have promised to bring technology to South Carolina.

    It would be nice if someone finally would... Not that it would matter to me; I'm probably leaving here for a California job...

    Benefits:

    Low cost of living

    Located between Atlanta, and the Research Triangle

    Decent infrastructure, due to the collage campuses

    Detractors:

    Well, it is South Carolina

    Convincing your staff to move here

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    1. Re:South Carolina!!! by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      After Fritz, what technology company is going to more to South Carolina?

      Or was it North Carolina?

      Actually, who cares?

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    2. Re:South Carolina!!! by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      * Detractors:
      * Well, it is South Carolina
      * Convincing your staff to move here


      I've lived in South Carolina for most of my life and I wouldn't say it's a bad place to live and actually right now I'd much rather be there than here in colorado where it's -20 with the wind chill :). The only real detractor I would say is the hurricanes, but california has earthquakes, so pick your poison. However, if you go too far outside of the main cities, you have to deal with hicks and rednecks. Charleston is really pretty and the coast has some nice beaches, and I would say it's a pretty good place to live.

      On a side note, you will have to get used to a few cultural differences: "ya'll damn yankies better no be comin' don her and talk 'bout no 'civil war', ain't been no 'civil war', ya'll must mean da 'war o' nothern agression'!"

    3. Re:South Carolina!!! by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

      Fritz Hollings is, unfortunately, in South Carolina...

      Here's hoping he gets unelected next time he's up....

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    4. Re:South Carolina!!! by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Fritz Hollings is, unfortunately, in South Carolina... Here's hoping he gets unelected next time he's up....

      You know what? The _real_ Fritz Hollings died about 25 years ago, when he was 93. Now all we see is a cardboard cutout Fritz, with a voicebox stuck on the back to talk. Jack Valenti is the voice.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    5. Re:South Carolina!!! by Yakko · · Score: 1
      I lived in Charleston for 3yr, and couldn't wait to get away to a cooler place.

      Hated the humidity, and the hurricanes... and the lack of snow. And the lack of decent network connectivity (I abused a dynamic dialup)

      Ironic I move to The Middle of Nowhere, MO, and the weather is just as lousy. Time to find a mostly-cold place with jobs. :o)

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    6. Re:South Carolina!!! by superflippy · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of Strom Thurmond. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings is one of the co-sponsors of the SSSCA.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  74. Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sorry, as an expat in the Bay Area I can tell you with assurance that KK blows away Tim's by a good margin.

    Once KK enters the Canuck market, you are going to see Tim's get hammered (or vastly improve their donuts in response)

    1. Re:Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Off topic alert: We have Krispy Creme's here in the Toronto area. It is so far successful, but seems to fill more of a niche dessert market concept as opposed to ever-present soup/sandwich/coffee/donut Tim Hortons. Hey, if Tim's can hold off the Starbucks assault, Krispy the Clown won't be too much of a challenge. FYI, Tim Horton, the legendary Toronto Maple Leafs defenseman, died in a drunk-driving crash halfway between Buffalo and Toronto.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      Try this: put some sugar and 99% cream in a food item. You'll short circuit this whole race and win the fastfood coffee shop wars instantly!

      Now, to the first chain that offers decent food without killing off all its patrons (d'oh!), goes a nobel prize.

    3. Re:Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Tim Hortons does well, not because of their donuts, but because of their coffee. I dont see too many people buying donuts, but to this day, despite only offering a house blend, they still seem to be everybit as popular a destination for coffee as the million-flavour Stabucks' et all ..

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by Gautama · · Score: 1

      Okay, I have to say it since nobody else is: Krispy Kreme donuts suck ass!

      I've only had the nasty glazed type, and I've been told they don't sell any other kind.

      If I'm going to eat a pastry, give me a small-bakery's output rather than the instant crap cranked out by minimum-wage grease-monkies.

    5. Re:Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by bark76 · · Score: 1

      I know lots of people who still love Tim Horton's donuts, they're so much better than KK (I live in San Jose now, and I miss Tim Horton's a lot). But like you said, most people do go to Tim Horton's for coffee.
      Another perk is that Jesus likes to visit Tim Horton's, never see that at KK or Starbucks, do you?

  75. eh, eh?? by zendeath · · Score: 1

    Maybe we Canadians say "eh", but at least we don't say "huh" with that annoying Bill & Ted's excellent adventure kind of accent.

    And at any rate, we have whatever we want the way we want to because we kicked US ass in both the men's and women's hockey tournaments. Eat that!

    --
    ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:eh, eh?? by lucky_duck · · Score: 0

      Very good! Woo hoo! Nice blow from a fellow canadian :-) Too bad we don't have all the same political scandals as the US have though. But then again, we wouldn't have guys like Rick Mercer asking americans what they know about canadians. Tim Horton our prime minister...HA! It would make canada a much more interesting country instead of worrying about what the americans think of us.

    2. Re:eh, eh?? by McSnickered · · Score: 1

      Oh man ... we are never gonna live that down.

      --
      They call me the working man. I guess that's what I am.
    3. Re:eh, eh?? by cebe · · Score: 1

      YAAA!

      My University School newspaper hot off the press this week had the classy headline of
      "I feel like I just got Laid for the First Time!" draped in maple leafs and pictures of people cheering in the campus pub surely taken after sakic's breakaway goal. I'm still celebrating myself. One thing about Canada: we don't need a national tragedy to show our flags. The kids across the street have a shrine in the snow consisting of their hockey net with so many holes in the net that it's pretty much just the red metal posts and corssbar with their sticks and flags waving in the Lethbridge wind. I Love it.

      In the words of Fred Willard, "Everything is a little sweeter up there".
      I would welcome Americans to Canada. Our dollar may be a peso ATM but I think they may find that life is quite nice up here if you can survive the winter. If we are going to be infested with any nationalality I would hope it's Americans.

      I don't think I say eh much but maybe I can't even tell anymore. It's the French Canadians speaking English that makes me laugh... with all due respect they sound "dumb" but I have no doubt that my french sounds dumb to them.

      Oh, and my Canada includes Quebec :)

      --
      You have paid for a total of 0 pages and so far 0 have been used up (0 today).
    4. Re:eh, eh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever had sex in a sleeping bag (not including the kind without anyone else), you'd know that Cold Winters ROCK!

    5. Re:eh, eh?? by zendeath · · Score: 1
      actually, I have, in a very cold, unheated cabin, in the Laurentian mountains (in Quebec, north of Montreal).

      It's great! makes me proud to be a Canadian.

      --
      ceci n'est pas une signature
  76. People are moving too. by SeaCrazy · · Score: 1

    People from the bay area have been moving up to Sacramento (about 100 miles) away because of the high cost of living for a long time.

    However, companies are not doing the same, and a lot of people end up keeping their old jobs and commuting every day.

    Perhaps it's not as inexpensive in Sacramento as some other areas, but the cost of relocation would be significantly less, plus it would probably be easier to retain employees when it's not so far.

    --
    .sig? Get your own damn .sig!
  77. Montreal is doing well (Multimedia City) by ondelette · · Score: 1

    Montreal has a large Multimedia City which is basically a whole section of the city where a lot of high tech companies have set foot:

    http://www.citemultimedia.com/english/home/home. as p

    You find Motorola, Discreet Logic... something like a 100 companies all within 1 km square. It is very, very cheap. You can get a nice appartment in Montreal for 300$US a month (not kidding) and be close enough so you don't have to drive to work.

    You also have an e-Commerce center growing fast.

    Companies get incredible subsidies to hire staff. The government basically pays almost half your salary if you are a developper.

    Montreal is by far the cheapest metropolist in North American and 9th largest city in North America plus people speak French plus the girls are leaner than average (statistically speaking) plus the food is much better than anywhere else in North America.

    Downsides? Cold weather, and of course, the fact that the salaries are on the low side.

    1. Re:Montreal is doing well (Multimedia City) by WildBeast · · Score: 2

      Salaries are okay, if it wasn't for all the taxes I could've done way more with my salary.

  78. We moved to Portland, Maine by ChiChiCuervo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's exactly what we did. The whole company up and moved from DC to Portland, Maine last December. Real Estate's ALOT cheaper, the people are ALOT nicer, and the traffic is ALOT better.

    1. Re:We moved to Portland, Maine by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Plus Portland has a really cool waterfront area. Lots o' fun to visit.

      So is your company hiring? ;)

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  79. food for thought by eracerblue · · Score: 2, Informative

    i like the "even Canada" statement. said as if it were completely outrageous. "even timbucktwo..."

    perhaps the weak Canadian dollar and the dual Canadian olympic hockey golds will be joined with a monumentous reverse brain drain. Canada's been complaining about it for years... maybe the US will get a kick at the can.

    and i see the "baren glacier as soon as you hit the border" misconception is still alive and well. Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and others are massive metropolatin centers with similar climate to many US cities. in Vancouver it rarely freezes and typically has winter temperatures in the mid-high 40's. (that's around 8degC... eh?)

    1. Re:food for thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...with similar climate to many US cities...

      Why yes. Similar to Detroit, Fargo, and Bangor. I can imagine the tourism brochure already: "Come to Canada! If you liked Fargo you'll LOVE Calgary!"

      ;) All in good fun...

      How long after the SCCCA passes her before Canada follow suit? If its more than a few years, it may be worth it to migrate north.

    2. Re:food for thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calgary. I've heard it CAN get quite cool there... but when I flew through Calgary in Jan 2001, it was about 68F! (+20C) They were having a "chinook" ... and everyone had t-shirts and shorts on.

    3. Re:food for thought by csbruce · · Score: 2

      perhaps the weak Canadian dollar and the dual Canadian olympic hockey golds will be joined with a monumentous reverse brain drain.

      Canada doesn't actually have a net brain drain. While it loses home-grown brains to America, it imports more than that number of brains from Asia.

    4. Re:food for thought by csbruce · · Score: 1

      and i see the "baren glacier as soon as you hit the border" misconception is still alive and well. Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and others are massive metropolatin centers with similar climate to many US cities.

      That simply isn't true. Just look at any weather map. When it's 32 in Buffalo, NY, it's 0 in Toronto, ON. Same with Niagra Falls, NY and Niagra Falls, ON. Just by stepping across the border! Better pack your toque, eh!

  80. I believe flashy locations are utterly pointless by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

    I never saw the reason for companies to locate their headquarters in the most expensive and trendy place possible. How many companies out there need that much physical proximity to others in the industry? Think of all the small manufacturing shops you see in the most remote places, and they depend on raw materiels and suffer if the freight cost is too high. What excuse does the IT industry have? None, as far as I can see. There are literally countless locations across the country that are ridiculously inexpensive and have the high-quality of life that will attract workers.

    But no, IT corporations say "We need to move to San Franciso!". They are idiotic, and they get what they deserve for making such stupid mistakes, I have about as much sympathy for them as those who are rebuilding for the third time in the same location because putting up a house on a flood plain was a Really Good Idea (tm).

    Is there any compelling reason to be there, other than ego? In most - read: almost all - cases....no.

    Furthermore, what really gets me, is when companies have little or no revenue stream and decide to plop down in the most expensive place they can find and then set to work on maybe, you know....making some money.

    Here is a stunning idea, locate somplace inexpensive - if you think you won't get any employees or business by setting up someplace that isn't flashy you are ignorant or simply unwilling to accept the truth. Then, build your bussiness slowly, spend as little as possible, supply good, but not extravagant workspaces and equipment and do away with most or all luxuries and see what happens. You might actually last more than a year or two. And when your company grows, it might actually be sensible to move to somplace more upscale. You know.....when you can actually afford to.

    People just need to think for a minute, before they go off making dumb and obvious mistakes then crying about it later on.

  81. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1
    You missed a couple

    Advantages

    you get to say "aboot"

    eh?

    Disadvantages

    it's not a real country ;-)

  82. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    an abundance of gorgeous people are our best kept secret

    Ah, I see you don't live in New Brunswick.

    I swear, all I'm looking for is a woman with less facial hair than me and no kids. Are my standards just too high?

  83. Sheltered from what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Norman, Oklahoma and we have everything the big cities have with a smaller percentage due to less population. Is your city implementing wireless access for the entire city? Doubtful. I have a 1350 sq.ft. home on 1/4 acre that cost me 80k and is close to the University. I do VB/ASP/PPC development and make 60k/year. Granted in Dallas I made 105k/year but my expenses were 2 to 3 times higher than in Oklahoma. The only difference in Oklahoma and the "Non Sheltered World" is cost of living and better standard of living. However, there are only 2 places in oklahoma worth living in, Norman and Tulsa (OKC is marginal)

    1. Re:Sheltered from what? by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      He is right, Norman Oklahoma is just like a big city. It is 4 miles across, yet takes a half hour to drive across thanks to dumbasses and the lovely 25 mph "main" street. :)

      It is FASTER to drive around norman via highway 9 then to actually try and cross it east/west.

    2. Re:Sheltered from what? by Ziest · · Score: 1
      Yea, and if you smoke a joint you will get 98 years in prison. Welcome to Oklahoma, set your watches back 100 years.

      --
      Another day closer to redwood heaven
    3. Re:Sheltered from what? by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      Which is really unfortuante considering...

      pot shrinks your penis size, so when you end up in prison for 98 years... you will end up as someones girlfriend.

    4. Re:Sheltered from what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pot shrinks your penis size

      You got anything to back this up?

      (OT, I know, I know. )

    5. Re:Sheltered from what? by TurboRoot · · Score: 1


      >You got anything to back this up?

      Sure! ANY type of smoking has the same effect on the penis that it does on the heart, it damages blood vessels messing up blood flow.

      The penis is like a rubber band that you stretch, the blood vessels in this penis are much smaller than those in the heart, so you end up with a structure that no longer stretches.

      It isn't like you can smoke one joint with weed, or one cigarette and suddenly your penis is smaller.. but over time these things make a difference.

    6. Re:Sheltered from what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you freaks, but my cock is just as hard and vigorous as it's always been. I'm 27 and have been smoking since I was 21. I guess by the time it makes that kind of impact you're too old to give a shit anyway.

      NEXT!

  84. And about time! by banky · · Score: 2

    The near mythic status of SF has to go. The idea that you can't do business without being in Cali or at least having a "west coast office" is bull, and has harmed the industry.

    That being said, I live in Fairfax Virginia and based on the employment section of the Post, it doesn't seem like people are exactly *flocking* to this part of the country. If they are, they aren't hiring. Its still pretty dismal around here, UNLESS you have a security clearance, in which case you have nothing but options... "Will code Perl to help fight the Taliban, please ignore that I'm a slacker misanthrope, that was cool in the dot-com days..."

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:And about time! by highcaffeine · · Score: 1

      I definitely have to agree with this. I live and work in Fairfax as well. The lower rents and other fees, coupled with the stronger relative purchasing power for similar salaries has always made me wonder why places like SF were viewed as the only "reasonable" place for high tech companies.

      I've just been suprised that the presence of some of the largest network providers in the world just down the road in Tysons/McLean hasn't made this area more of a hot spot for technology companies already. Sure, we've got AOL, Mae East (a complex of tier 1 providers) and a couple Oracle buildings among other big companies, but the DC Metro area's not usually associated with high tech.

      And honestly, I wouldn't mind it staying that way seeing what has happened over in SF the past few years. I kind of like having money left each month after paying rent and utilities.

  85. First Hockey Domination.. now this by georgep77 · · Score: 0

    It seems things are really going our way these days, our best Olympic showing in years followed up by the *news* that it's cheaper up here in the great white north(tm). San Fransisco expensive??? I don't believe it!

    Cheers,
    _GP_

  86. LOTS of better locations... by eliasfallon · · Score: 1

    I'll have to agree with many others that there are lots of other (unmentioned) locations in the U.S. I work for a small company in the EDA industry. Probably 90% of the other companies in our industry are located in the Bay Area. We have often found it a big selling point when recruiting that we offer competitive salaries to those companies, but in areas (Pittsburgh, PA and Phoenix, AZ) where that money is worth A LOT more.

    Both of the areas we are located in have good schools to recruit from, and are decent sized cities with everything for good quality of life. Phoenix especially has a huge high tech community already. You just have to put up with 100 degrees in the summer, but its beautiful in february.

  87. Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wins by jamiefaye · · Score: 4, Insightful

    San Francisco and Silicon Valley has an enormous critical mass of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/Trans people, and Nerds. The counter-culture continues to thrive here.

    For techies - it means that you are respected and accepted everywhere, no matter what you look like.

    It is the opposite of the nightmare world Jon Katz describes in "Voices from the Hellmouth". Nobody who has been dumped-on for being smart or diferent wants to go back out into the cold.

    Attempts to replicate the Bay Area have to replicate this tolerance too - which often requires a massive, slow change in attitude.

    -- Jamie

  88. Come to Markham, Ontario by CaptCanuk · · Score: 1

    Lots of tech companies are moving to Markham, Ontario - self appointed High Tech Capital of Ontario - just on the outskirt of Toronto. Cheap land, and tax benefits for moving out there apparently. IBM, Autodesk, ATI and others just seen driving across the highway.

    And what's up with the "they're-not-even-a-real-country-anyway dept" comment? Dontcha know we beat you in Olympic hockey eh? :P *Warning* If you didn't like the last statement, don't read my sig!

    Oh, there are many Tim Horton's out there as well - there's nothing quite like a traffic jam around a coffee shop.

    As for the movie industry moving north:
    It's not like I can walk around my neighbourhood currently without accidentally walking onto a movie set anyhow. I nearly walked into a stunt car that was supposed to hit two actresses.

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
    1. Re:Come to Markham, Ontario by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Hello, fellow Markham resident! Nice to run across your post :)

      I live in Markham too, work just on the Richmond Hill side of the border off 16th avenue. And yep, I can think of 3 Timmie's within short driving distance from any given location around here!

      I look out the window and I see Compaq, Black & Decker, Levi's and a bunch of other cool companies' head offices. You can now probably guess almost exactly where I am right now.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    2. Re:Come to Markham, Ontario by pheesh · · Score: 1

      geez, you two, get a room

      --
      They have a tremendous selection of fresh juices
  89. On a related note by pmz · · Score: 2

    The huge variation in the cost of living among cities is why those "What Programmers Get Paid" surveys are one of my pet peeves.

    I always feel a bit inferior--for a second--when I look at how underpaid I am relative to the statistics in these articles. However, I quickly realize that these statistics are mostly from people in places like Silicon Valley, where a pup tent in someone's back yard costs $150,000.

    The fact is that these articles include naieve and misguided analyses of income. It is much better to just rely on a few real data points, such as those from recent job offers, and use local consumer-price-index numbers to scale the salaries accordingly. It is suprising how $40,000/yr. in a small south-east city can easily equal $60,000/yr. in Chicago, for example.

    1. Re:On a related note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww come on, you can get at least a 4 man tent for $150K in the bay area........ :)

    2. Re:On a related note by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No lie, a friend of a former coworker got his house in SF demolished somehow and, while negotiating to rebuild it, some people offered to pay $1000/mo to live in the ruins.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  90. In the words of the immortal Geddy Lee of Rush... by dstone · · Score: 2

    Take off!
    To the Great White North.
    Take off!
    It's a beauty way to go.

  91. Moving to Canada? by BlaKnail · · Score: 1

    I can't believe it has been brought up yet(unless I missed something), but moving to Canada will take the companies and employees out of reach of the RIAA and MPAA's grubby hands. The US's draconian laws don't operate too well outside of its borders (yet)

    1. Re:Moving to Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And right into the hands of SOCAN and whatever the MPAA's equivalent is in Canada. Our laws in these issues are usually "N'Sync" with those of the US. Whenever we deviate with what the US wants, the US Government retaliates with trade action costing thousands of jobs in Canada. Thus we don't deviate.

  92. Conadian dialect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There's a mouse about the house" == "There's a moose aboot the hoose"

  93. Mod me down... by flying_triguy · · Score: 1

    Let's put all the "Canada is the best at hockey" Comments under here so the rest of the world can skip over our chest beating (I am Canadian, Lemieux is a gosh darned good guy)

    I concur that Tim Horton's does have the best coffee, just don't move to Vancouver... Damn starbucks

    1. Re:Mod me down... by nexthec · · Score: 1

      roll up the rim to win......

      man what I wouldnt give of for a bowl of chill, a sandwich, and a donut right now........

  94. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by walkah · · Score: 1

    >>PLus there is that Banff film dealie and you have hotties like Nelly Furtado and Pamela Anderson from there, so it can't be all bad

    well... Pamela lee/anderson/etc may have been born in canada, but she was made in the USA.

  95. Bad Joke by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Ok, I've got a few karma points to throw away:

    Q. How do Canadians spell Canada?
    A. C, eh? N, eh? D, eh?

    /me bows.

    Ok, now continue with the real conversation.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Bad Joke by Quixote · · Score: 2

      You've got the story wrong, eh? It was like this, eh.
      Three Scots who had just found this huge hunka land, eh, were trying to come up with a name for it, eh? They decided to draw letters from a hat, eh? So the first guy picked "C", and announced "C, eh?". The second guy drew "N" and called out "N, eh?". And the third bloke drew "D" and said "D, eh?". Hence the name, eh.

  96. Canadia by maggard · · Score: 5, Informative
    No, I doubt lots of American high-tech employees will come flooding to Canada. For one thing it's rather difficult for a US'er to get a work permit. Like the US Canada gets lots of applications but has commitments like being a Commonwealth nation, there are different priorities. Furthermore with Nortel, Corel, and the like still hurting there's no employment crunch up here, no need to invite folks from south of the border.

    Next if US'ers moves here they'll be paid in Canadian dollars. While you'll live well in Canada it's a big pay cut from the US, especially when you add taxes on top. Furthermore prices in Canadian cities have started to rise and while they don't compare to NYC, Boston or SF they're still shocking the natives and expensive in local terms.

    Finally there are the cultural differences. While visiting Toronto or Vancouver may feel very familiar to a US'er that changes when you actually live here (Montreal is immediately obvious as being different.) There're the little things like brands being different, everyone being that one notch politer, and Curling being a real sport. There's also a dearth of ghastly evening news (you'd think Canadians are the world's worst drivers from watching TV news until you realize there aren't as many shootings and other violent incidents for the if-it-bleeds-it-leads stories) and lots more interest in international events.

    However there are even more important differences. One is the Quebec issue. This is where I live but it comes up everywhere across the nation: French language laws, government policies, separatism, and the economic shock-waves every time Quebec threatens to leave.

    Other significant differences:

    • Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.
    • However by-and-large Canada is more liberal then the US and does have far fewer of the extreme right-wing biblethumpers.
    • Canada doesn't place individual liberties above all else; the general good is at least as important.
    • The Provinces are stronger politically then US States and there's a lot more Federal/Provincial jostling.
    • Strong social policies often more in line with European models then US.
    • Political parties that don't map at all onto the US model.
    • Socialized Medicine (services are generally good in spite of the horror stories often heard in the States.)
    • Establishing credit across the border can be difficult, sometimes very difficult.
    • Lots of technology comes out later in Canada (wireless Palms) or not at all (TiVo.)
    • While Canadians get US TV & somewhat radio there are lots of programs, acts, and personalities that are big in Canada but unheard of in the US. Some are programs like "This Hour Has 22 Minutes" and others are bands that make Top-10 in Canada but never rise above Top 500 in the US.
    No, I like living in Canada a lot, and US friends love visiting, but ask any US expat. living in Canada and they'll tell you it is different and it's more then the good beer.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Canadia by Kwil · · Score: 2

      Lots of technology comes out later in Canada (wireless Palms) or not at all (TiVo.)

      Yet at the same time, the tech that does come out in Canada tends to get adopted a lot more quickly than it does in the States. The debit card is the classic example. Even our small convenience stores were accepting them almost 10 years ago.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    2. Re:Canadia by Hillman · · Score: 1
      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.

      I have to disagree with that. Where i'm from(Quebec), religious lessons are optional and next year they will be eliminated. They will replaced with a "religions around the world" class. Well unless you go to a private school, then they can teach you religion lessons if they want to.

    3. Re:Canadia by tb3 · · Score: 2

      For one thing it's rather difficult for a US'er to get a work permit.

      Not necessarily. The TN-1 (Nafta) visa is relatively easy to obtain and renew. They expire on an annual basis, but can be renewed indefinitely. I worked in the States for three years on a TN-1 and it was a piece of cake. It's the same for americans working in Canada.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.
      I have to disagree with that. Where i'm from(Quebec), religious lessons are optional and next year they will be eliminated.

      Until three years ago Quebec had Catholic & Protostant school boards. They were turned into French and English boards but the culture remains. Yes, the mandatory classes are being dropped but there's still FAR more of it then in the US. For example EVERY school I know of has large crosses on the outside, in the lobby, etc which is VERY unlike the US.

      Spend some time talking to a US'er who went through those school systems and compare them to your own, I think you'll be amazed at the differences.

      BTW, I'm a US'ers who lives in Montreal (Ahuntsic).

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    5. Re:Canadia by stew-a-cide · · Score: 1

      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.

      Being a Canadian, I have no idea what your talking about :) While some provinces fund part (or as in Ontario, nearly all) of religious schools (better than the 'classims' of US private schools), there are still an abundance of public schools that are just as secular as anything you'll find in the US. While religion is discussed as a topic, it isn't in the "christianity is the one and only" sense I get that it is in the US. And I don't think things like evolution, are are hot topis in the US, are even an issue here.

    6. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      For one thing it's rather difficult for a US'er to get a work permit. Like the US Canada gets lots of applications but has commitments like being a Commonwealth nation, there are different priorities. Furthermore with Nortel, Corel, and the like still hurting there's no employment crunch up here, no need to invite folks from south of the border.
      Any part of the full statement you'd like to take exception with? (I really look down on folks who selectively quote and leave out relevant parts, its so intellectually dishonest.)

      The US was sucking in techies like mad while the boom was on and the economy was strong. Now with the boom over and neither country's economy as strong do you imagine Canada is interested in importing lots of techies or that employers are having trouble filling spots, are interested in jumping through the hoops of bringing in a US'er if they don't need to?

      No, they're not. Canadian high tech has lots of local talent sending in resumes who are already established, won't get homesick halfway through a project, know the score and understand the living and work syles/conditions/situations/payscales, are a bit more invested in staying around.

      Can US'ers move to Canada? Yes. Is there gonna be a flood? No.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    7. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.
      Being a Canadian, I have no idea what your talking about :) While some provinces fund part (or as in Ontario, nearly all) of religious schools (better than the 'classims' of US private schools), there are still an abundance of public schools that are just as secular as anything you'll find in the US.
      Well, I'm directly familier with Nova Scotia, Quebec, and Ontario: That's more then 50% of Canada's population and all have vastly more religion in their schools then even the deepest bible-belt US school. BTW I've lived in California, Texas, Massachusetts, Maryland & New York. Heck, take a look at many of them, see those crosses on the outside and in the lobby - think you'd see that in a US public school?

      I was astonished when I moved to Canada the amount of religion that is institutionialized, I expect Canadians don't see it only because they're so used to it. As noted in another thread only 3 years ago did Montreal change from Catholic & Protastant school boards (PUBLIC school boards) to French & English. My lover used to have to go to religion classes, got a grade for it. That would be unthinkable in the US public schools.

      As to "classisms" of US private schools it is every bit the same in Canada. I'm well familier with US (non-parochial) private schools, many of my friends growing up attended them, went on to prep schools. I can assure you there are no differences.

      However, religion in public schools, it is a big difference. Try talking to a US'er and discussing this topic, I assure you that you'll both will be amazed at the different experiences.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    8. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      ... the tech that does come out in Canada tends to get adopted a lot more quickly than it does in the States. The debit card is the classic example.
      Its the classic example because it is one of the very few examples. By and large Canadian business has been slower to adopt technological change then US ones. Furthermore while there are any number of small differences for the consumers there are few that are significent. Indeed the biggest I can think of offhand is that many Canadian phone companies have offered home-phones-with-text-services for years and that many Canadian pay phones take cards.

      Any big technology-penetration-into-the-Canadian-market stories other then debit cards you can recommend?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    9. Re:Canadia by rudedog · · Score: 2

      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.

      I don't know what Quebec was like as far as schools, but in Alberta, I saw very little religion when I attended the public school. It's not enshrined in Canadian law, but it also isn't emphasized like it is in the US (i.e., schools fighting to put up the 10 commandments, or say the lords prayer before class, etc.). An interesting book on this subject is Lois Sweet, God in the Classroom.

      The Provinces are stronger politically then US States and there's a lot more Federal/Provincial jostling.

      I don't think this is true; states have significantly more juristiction over many areas compared to the provinces. There is more jostling, but it's mostly the provinces trying to get more power, a la the states in the United States.

      Establishing credit across the border can be difficult, sometimes very difficult.

      Somewhat true, although it goes both ways, and it's short-term. When I moved to the US, all I could get was a $1000 credit-limit credit card. Three years later, I'm shredding credit card applications every day, and my wife and I have more credit than we can use (not to mention a large mortgage). I think that Canadian creditors are more careful than their US counterparts, partly because the US counterparts have lobbied successfully to make bankruptcy much more difficult, but establishing a good credit record is not too hard, assuming that you have good credit habits.

      I agree with the rest of your points. On the other hand, I also like living in Seattle. But then, Seattle is probably as close as a city can get to being Canadian, and still be American.

    10. Re:Canadia by rudedog · · Score: 2

      My lover used to have to go to religion classes, got a grade for it.

      This is only in the Catholic, or separate, school system. In the public school system, there are no religion classes. I'm speaking from personal experience, because I attended Catholic school from grades 1-8 and public after that, and never got religious instruction after grade 8.

      The separate/public school dichotomy is a throwback to when Canada was becoming a country, and is a bad thing, in my opinion, but nevertheless, is actually in the constitution.

      However, if you don't want your children getting religious education, you can send them to the public school, and they won't.

      All of the above is based on my experience growing up in Alberta. Things may be different in other provinces; especially the further east you go, since it was the eastern provinces that influenced this aspect of the Canadian constitution.

    11. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      My lover used to have to go to religion classes, got a grade for it.
      This is only in the Catholic, or separate, school system. In the public school system, there are no religion classes. I'm speaking from personal experience, because I attended Catholic school from grades 1-8 and public after that, and never got religious instruction after grade 8.
      This may be true in Alberta - it is not universally true. As I noted I'm familier with other Canadian schools systems where this is distictly not true.

      Perhaps along with talking to some US'ers about religion in schools some discussion with folks from other provinces would be in order also.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    12. Re:Canadia by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      This is (was?) true in Ontario. I got bounced between two Catholic elementary schools in Markham before going to a public high school (Markham District)

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    13. Re:Canadia by dadragon · · Score: 1

      It's interesting, really. I grew up in Saskatoon, SK. We had the public/separate system like in Alberta, but to this day I see no reason for it. In Saskatoon, I can think of two Catholic churches that are not attached to a high school. In Calgary, I can't think of any, but I've lived here for about 6 months and haven't paid much attention.

      I think we'd be better served by Protestant schools, like "Corny Rhymer Mennonite High School" or "Saskatoon United High School"... The Catholic church is pretty close to dead in Saskatoon at least. Of my friends I have two who actually are Catholic, but very many who attend Catholic schools who aren't.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    14. Re:Canadia by stew-a-cide · · Score: 1

      WTF? Crosses in the school? Religious class? Maybe in a CATHOLIC school or something, but in public primary and secondary schools in Ontario (which I have attended) there's no such thing. I'm 99% sure you're thinking catholic schools (which may or may not be funded by the gov. depending on province) because no public (i.e. secular) schools in Canada have such things, that's just insane.

      Besides, having 'crosses' in a CANADIAN public school makes NO sense, since 1. Christianity is not dominant like in the US and 2. Canadians are MUCH MORE secularized than Americans (less than 1/2 as many Canadians attend a house of worship as Americans), and the level of atheism/non-affiliation is many times higher.

    15. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      ... because no public (i.e. secular) schools in Canada have such things, that's just insane.
      Really? Insane? Perhaps you weren't paying attention, might want to talk to some of your fellow Canadians. Or perhaps you'd care to read the other threads associated with this one?

      Explain the crosses on all of the schools around me (Montreal) or how until 3 years ago we had Catholic & Protostant school boards? These AREN'T some sort of non-mainstream/parochial/private schools, ALL of the public schools have them here as they do in some other parts of the country.

      Its dark now or I could drive around my neighborhood and photograph *every* school and show you a cross, post them on a website.

      Perhaps you might want to do a biiit more research and doublecheck your statements before you starting calling into question other person's statements because you're being really insulting and I'm gonna expect you to own up to it and apologize.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    16. Re:Canadia by MacOSXHead · · Score: 1

      Ummm, I am pretty sure that both the US and Canada cannot just change their minds about giving out these work permits. Is is part of the NAFTA agreements. Also, I can never stand the nativist sentiment about trying to keep workers from working in one another's countries, especially countries like Canada and the US. This sort of cultural exchange is very good for both countries. The US has always been (relative to the rest of the world) very liberal about letting in foreign workers. This has certainly been to the benefit of the US economy.

    17. Re:Canadia by FFFish · · Score: 2

      "Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools."

      WTF? Not in any of the Western provinces. I think you must have experience only with Quebec.

      "Canada doesn't place individual liberties above all else; the general good is at least as important."

      Please name an example. I'm fairly certain you're mistaken, but perhaps I've remained ignorant of cases where an individuals rights were subsumed to the "greater good."

      "it's a big pay cut from the US, especially when you add taxes on top"

      I think not. In pursuing some of the ideas in this thread, I've taken a look into this. It seems that when all is said and done, you'll have about as much fun money left over after you take care of the necessities (tax, housing, food, retirement, etc) in either country. Mad-money-wise, it's break-even for the employee.

      "This Hour Has 22 Minutes"

      Truly the best reason to remain in Canada. Man, we eat our politicians alive up here! I eagerly await the next season, when Marge, Warrior Princess, really does begin to smite a few of those bastards.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    18. Re:Canadia by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Well, we were comparing debit card use in Canada to use in the US, so I'll continue that stream of thought.

      Our telco systems have always been many years more advanced than American ones. Indeed, Canada has been a world leader in telco tech.

      Our banks seem to be more advanced. They are, at any rate, buying up American banks at an astonishing rate. All our national banks are players in the global banking market.

      We have a bunch of wireless companies that are tech leaders, too. Research in Motion would be one; Wi-Lan would be another. Both, I think, are spin-offs from the telco stuff, though.

      There's a little startup that's developed a process for completely and safely incinerating (or is it digesting?) hazardous waste. It's got big contracts with the US Army. Canadian grown.

      Oh, speaking of Canadian grown... but, no, let's not go there. The DEA won't like it. :-)

      Our biotech industry is pretty much world-class, too, and always has been. Man, that's a nearly endless list of developments and technologies.

      There's always Bombardier, the makers of everything from Lear(?) jets to snowmobiles and jetskis, to warplane instrumentation.

      CAE is a world-class flight simulation/training company. And they're contracted to do something for the US Navy. Might be the control programs for their new Windows-based destroyer. Shudder. That'd be the project from hell.

      Oil and gas technologies surely must be something we do. Can't name any, though; it's not something I've tried paying attention to. But alternative energy, we've got some great tech there, from fuel cells to thermoelectrical to wind power to hydroelectricity: pretty fine tech all around.

      Hell, this is turning into an endless list. Tech-wise, Canada's near the top. We do it all, and we do it all extremely well.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    19. Re:Canadia by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Why, oh why, would anybody want to use a debit card? If you've got a credit card and even a thimble full of discipline, you get a free loan to the end of the month. For small cash purchases you can carry currency that you know is always going to "work". I never saw a $20 bill fail because of a technical malfunction.

      With a debit card, you have to deposit money in a non interest-bearing account.

      The only reason I can think of why you would want to do this is because you are paranoid about getting robbed of your cash. That's letting the criminals win as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    20. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      I'm not disputing ANY of Canada's products, I'm just pointing out that by and large Canada's businesses overall are slower then the use to adopt new technologies and Canada's consumer products are generally a rev behind the US's. BTW this isn't news, it's been well documented and comes up regularly in Canadian business publications.

      You can point out all of the single examples of Canada having an innovative high-end product (btw whose largest market is generally the US so it's not like they're Canada-only products.) Now show me what I was asking about, consumer products that the average Canadian can use that their US counterpart doesn't (not counting McCains products.) Not flight simulators or CANDU reactors but something one can find in Canada's Futureshop and not US's Circuit City.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    21. Re:Canadia by achaudhary · · Score: 1

      Uh, easy. Broadband. Twice the penetration in the US, 20-30% cheaper, generally available universally within metropolitan areas, will be available in most rural areas soon in Alberta (Calgary is in Alberta).

    22. Re:Canadia by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      WTF??? There is no need to deposit your money in a non-interest bearing account. I have a regular savings account and can still use my debit card for purchases. Banking here is obviously a little bit different from what you're used to.

    23. Re:Canadia by achaudhary · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly, I have no idea what you are talking about either. I have never even heard this mentioned before, and went to school in Alberta (the most right-wing province) for 6 years. I've been in the US education system for 3 years now, and quite frankly, Judeo-Christianity has a bigger hold here. Evolution is still debated in 5-10 states, abstinence is taught in suburban New York school boards... Crosses in public school? Many areas have publicly funded Catholic AND 'secular' (NOT Protestant) school systems, because of Canada's large Catholic population. There is no such thing as Protestant schools. They don't teach religion, and if they do, it's a religion studies class, where you analyze world religions. Show me proof that a community exists in Canada that has Catholic and Protestant school boards, or a secular school that has crosses all over it. I'm a Muslim, so I'm sure it's not that I'm 'used' to it.

    24. Re:Canadia by BlueBlade · · Score: 1

      Hum, I grew up in Montreal, and graduated elementary and high school with the public catholic system. First of all, it's obvious that you haven't actually attended the schools here. Religion courses aren't mandatory. They haven't been for at least 20 years (when I went to school). If the parents don't want their children to have religion courses (a single course a week mind you), they their children don't. It is replaced by some kind of morality course, a little bit like philosophy. And, from grade 3 (childrend are 8 or 9 years old), the children are actually allowed to override their parents' choice in religion courses.

      Another thing to mention... I suspect you don't have a good idea of what religion courses are like. I took religion classes until grade 9, and there isn't much indoctrination done there at all. It's mostly catholic and christian religion history and practices, teachings, etc. Things like the commandments, etc. Very little emphasis is placed on sinning and such, it's very positive and not meant to induce behavior. I'm an agnostic btw, and I have been since age 14. I still took some religion classes because it was rather interesting. They don't assume you're a believer in these classes. You don't have to be, and many aren't. So in that aspect I think it is very different than the idea you have of a "religious class".

      --
      Religion is the best example of mass psychosis
    25. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Uh, easy. Broadband. Twice the penetration in the US, 20-30% cheaper, generally available universally within metropolitan areas, will be available in most rural areas soon in Alberta (Calgary is in Alberta).

      Thank you - I'm well aware of where Calgery is. My Mom's Canadian, I've got a half dozen aunts & uncles across the country plus cousins and others, have lived here five years, etc. I've also been to Calgery and was scouted for a job there years ago (I had some unique qualifications.)

      Back to Broadband you failed to note its massively subsidized - not a legitimate comparison. Besides which Broadband is widely (just not as widely) availaible in the States.

      What can I find in FutureShop I can't find in Circuit City? What consumer service is in Canada but not the US?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    26. Re:Canadia by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      Broadband is NOT massively subsidized. It is being promoted though not funded by the federal government (will be in the future) and soon-to-be subsidized for rural areas by the Alberta government. The fact that it may be subsidized has no effect on the fact that the prices are lower here AT THIS POINT IN TIME. Which means that the situation can only improve. As far as what you can find in Futureshop and not Circuit City...there's not much difference at all. Therefore Canada and the U.S. seem to be on a level playing field, with Canada perhaps edging ahead regarding broadband and standard of living. So why bitch about working up here?

    27. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      First of all, it's obvious that you haven't actually attended the schools here.
      No, I didn't. My elementary & primary schooling was in four European nations ending up in the US.

      However many of my peers in their 30's and 40's are natives so I hear about it from them and about their children. I expect half of the issue is that most of the Canadians have no idea how absent religion is from US schools (IMHO a very good thing.)

      While there might be a very cautious religion-and-ethics-around-the-world class or why-the-Crusades-happened unit there is never a representative of a religion on staff as such in a US public school. There is never a religious symbol on the school building or inside. There is never any connection between Church & State in public schools however much some may wish otherwise.

      This is not and has not been the case in Canada. While it's not universal it is true for the majority of the population. As noted it is common in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes, also historically amongst the First Nations folks (or the residental schools were run by ???)

      Its all very nice that the classes you attended weren't coericive and really irrelevant whatever view you hold now: The point is that to a US'er considering moving to Canada would find any classes, connections, official state religions bizarre in the extreme.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    28. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Really - then all of my friends with kids buying PC and getting online 'cause they get a kid-in-school rebate from the Provincial government aren't subsidized? This is true in several provinces, I don't know if Alberta is one specifically.

      However, I'm not bashing Canada so stop trying to "defend" it. I could get a job in about any country and having lived in quite a few number so I know what I like: I chose to live in Canada.

      However for J. Random High-Techer considering upping and moving to Canada 'bout all of us US expats. will tell you there are significent differences and lots of trade-offs and they're a hell of a lot deeper the zed-or-zero.

      Back to the topic yes there are lots of products one can pick up in a Circuit City that aren't available in Future Shop. Like I noted wireless Palm, TiVos (non-satellite) and generally most anything else just arrived on the market. GSM phones are now working in many US cities, as did metropolitan wireless (Riccochet.) Often times it will eventually make it to Canada (though not always) but often in the second shipment.

      Don't believe my? Go shopping in a big US electronics store, compare it to back home. I'm back and forth nearly every week; trust me if I want the very latest I'll find it South, not North. This isn't a terrible thing but it is of interest to geeks.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    29. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Ummm, I am pretty sure that both the US and Canada cannot just change their minds about giving out these work permits.
      Um - I know (not "pretty sure") each nation keeps control over this; or don't you recall the visa battles a few years ago? Silly Valley was screaming they were starving, Canadians were lining up six deep to move, it was still a tough deal to swing. This is also true in reverse; I can refer you to several dozen other Americans of my acquaintence who can attest it is not trivial (it seems to be a rule at Canadian cocktail parties that all of the US'ers must be introduced to each other, usually as such.)
      Also, I can never stand the nativist sentiment about trying to keep workers from working in one another's countries, especially countries like Canada and the US.
      Thank you for your opinion; I'm sure it is revelatory to someone and I urge you to make it known to your congress-critter at first oppportunity. However your dream is not the one espoused by many folks who see their jobs and standard of living deeply threatened by non-local labor. Again, I can refer you to several very good friends now living in California who had to battle to get in and are now deeply concerned about their positions being cut and their having to scoot back to Canada.

      Tell me, would you extend to Mexicans the same open-border/open-work policies you'd like to extend to Canadians? How about Germans? Koreans? Afghanastani?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    30. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Show me proof that a community exists in Canada that has Catholic and Protestant school boards, or a secular school that has crosses all over it. Admission and Enrolment of Students for the 1998-99 School Year
      Photos of crosses will have to wait, I'm off in a few hours for 10 days in Florida. However here's a cite proving dual boards did exist a mere three years ago:
      http://www.meq.gouv.qc.ca/REFORME/info_ref/anglais /number3.htm
      The Québec education system is undergoing the most important reform in its history. On July 1, 1998, the existing Catholic and Protestant school boards will be replaced by new French-language and English-language school boards. The Québec education system is undergoing the most important reform in its history. On July 1, 1998, the existing Catholic and Protestant school boards will be replaced by new French-language and English-language school boards.

      Not today, but certianly while you were of appropriate age if you'd been in their jurisdiction.

      Try gravy on the words, helps them go down better.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    31. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Ah - legal documents.

      The Protestant School Board of Greater Montreal,
      the Greater Quebec School Board, the Lakeshore
      School Board and the Quebec Association of
      Protestant School Boards Appellants

      v.

      The Attorney General of Quebec Respondent

      and

      The Attorney General for Ontario and
      the Attorney General of Newfoundland Interveners

      Goes into great detail over which religious officials get to choose what, all with public funds, also don't neglect the Ontario and Newfoundland bits...

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    32. Re:Canadia by stygar · · Score: 1

      Which schools are you talking about religion in? Many provinces have public Catholic school systems. However, every province that has these also has a non-religious public system as well, so where's the harm?

    33. Re:Canadia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, what is wrong with teaching relative abstinence ?
      It is a perfectly reasonably solution that has nothing to do with religion but rather with more healthy and safer lifestyle.

      As far as Judeo-Christianity hold ??
      Hmm ... evolution might be debated but at least Christians tend to treat their wives and daughters not like slaves and avoid torturing them for crimes like driving a car and venturing outside without a male escort.
      You know what would qualify as an ultimate irony ?
      Getting a lesson about progressive "religion" from a Muslim, of all people ...
      Representative of one of the most ridiculous religions around, that has not changed its basic mentality since IX century.
      There is nothing to be proud of , you know.
      With no exception, every Muslim country ends up being some sort of religion-controlled state ...

    34. Re:Canadia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've been in the US education system for 3 years now, and quite frankly, Judeo-Christianity has a bigger hold here. "

      No fucking shit.
      Perhaps because this country has its roots in these social and religious systems ?

    35. Re:Canadia by Kwil · · Score: 2

      istartedi wrote:
      Why, oh why, would anybody want to use a debit card?

      and in response, istartedi wrote:
      If you've got a credit card ... [emphasis added]

      The other reason is simple convenience. My paycheque goes straight into my bank account. Most of my bills come out automatically, and those that don't I pay via the 'net. When I go to the store I can pay via credit or debit. So I can go for months without even seeing cash. I never worry about whether I have any or not.

      Typically though, if I find I'm short of cash at the store, I'll use debit and ask them to give me an extra twenty or forty dollars on it. They don't mind since they don't have to deal with the credit-card's 3% cut on it, and then I have a bit of cash on me which I can use for vending machines.

      Now once they wire up the dang chocolate bar machine to the net, I probably won't bother getting cash out at all.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    36. Re:Canadia by Kwil · · Score: 1

      Never argued that we don't get as many of the gizmos.. argued that what we get we seem to take up pretty quick.

      Of course the company's making the newest gizmos don't sell here first.. we're a smaller market. Big pickings are in the states, plus there's less to deal with there in terms of transport, duties, etc.

      Oh.. and you were looking for household services we had first beyond the debit card? I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think that the house-hold voice-mail/multi-line/caller-id packages were in wide usage here before down in the states.

      As for products, oddly, the water-bed.

      But you are right about the one thing, for the absolute newest in geek-toys, you're better off shopping in the states..

      ..but real geeks shop on-line anyway. :)

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    37. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Never argued that we don't get as many of the gizmos.. argued that what we get we seem to take up pretty quick.
      Some of your countryfolks disagree about the former, and your government about the latter.
      Of course the company's making the newest gizmos don't sell here first.. we're a smaller market. Big pickings are in the states, plus there's less to deal with there in terms of transport, duties, etc.
      Transports, duties, I think those are pretty much a blip for large importers. Rather I think size of the market and wealth of the market as well as visibility of the market are more important The product hasn't shipped in NA until it has shipped in the US where 99% of the reviewers are as well as the vast majority of the customers. That US'ers have more disposable income is also likely an influence (not an opinion but a standard economic fact.)
      Oh.. and you were looking for household services we had first beyond the debit card? I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think that the house-hold voice-mail/multi-line/caller-id packages were in wide usage here before down in the states.
      Thank you. That was the example I used when I asked for you something other then debit cards. So you're stuck on a third eh?
      As for products, oddly, the water-bed.
      Oh, well there's a massive market, thriving, highly relevant. That was a fad of them in the 70's and early 80's and then...? Are they still a big product in Canada? I really do doubt it.
      But you are right about the one thing, for the absolute newest in geek-toys, you're better off shopping in the states..

      ..but real geeks shop on-line anyway. :)

      Actually when we shop online we have the products shipped to my parent's house in the US and pick them up there on trips (I'm down there at least every month on average.) By the time one jumps through the hoops of retailors who aren't set up to ship internatonially or charge absurd amounts for doing so it often isn't a winning proposition to get stuff sent here. For those that do have Canadian branches the prices aren't all that great generally.

      For example we needed a new webcam recently. The few remaining companies on the market with active development, XP drivers, and high quality image are IBM through a remarketed product & Intel. By the time we figured shipping & tariffs from websites (other then www.ibm.ca's own ridiculous listing) the Maison du IBM in a mall downtown offered the same price. The Intel was the same case, it was available in the local screwdriver shoppes for about what it would have cost to buy & get it shipped from online.

      Love Canada, love LOTS of things about it, live here by choice. But there are trade-offs and consumer technology is one of them.

      I usually figure for products a 6 month lag, for services it can be several years or more. Sometimes it's language, labelling & support issues, other times there's constrained production so why bother selling in Canada before the easy-pickings in the US are supplied, and finally there's just the issue that lots of businesses are US-centric and the Canadian market isn't big enough, wealthy enough, or familier enough to make any effort on.

      BTW I've worked for several software firms over the years where we explicitly DIDN'T sell to Canada. For many countries we had licensees through folks who do nothing but support US software in their domestic markets but Canada - we just blew off. It wasn't any slam on Canada (and certianly not my call) but the folks in charge didn't want to do translations or find bilingual support staff, didn't feel the market was worth the bother it entailed for them. In one case they'd regularly get calls from Canada and would service them but if it came in French "we don't sell in Canada." (True as far as it went, they didn't advertise in explicitly Canadian venues and supposedly refused direct sales to Canada.)

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  97. Re:Amazing. - Are you shitting me??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chicago sucks. I just got the fuck out of that shithole. Maybe if you could kill off half the population it'd be OK. Cram way too many people with sub-par educations into a city with terrible weather, long commutes, flat land with no natural beauty, expensive, old, run-down, housing, lots of racial tension, and one of the most corrupt mayors in the country and you've got Chicago. The best thing that could ever happen for Chicago is that it would sink into the swap it was built on. I'm amazed you think that Chicago is cheap. It's nowhere near cheap. When it costs $300,000 to buy a tear down house in the suburbs or upwards of a million to buy a flat in Lincoln Park, forget cheap. There are still many states where you can buy a brand new home for $100,00 to $150,000.

  98. livin large in KY by grrrlyboy · · Score: 1

    i've been working for for a tech company now for 3 years now in Louisville, KY. when we were bought by a larger firm they moved a group of people here and none of them could believe how cheap the cost of living is! it was and still is this company's philosophy that there is outstanding talent here in the bluegrass state and why not remain when it's so much cheaper to live, employ, and enjoy! just my .02

    --
    mary jane capri - managing editor monkeypantz.net For every woman who burned her bra, there is a man ready to wear one
    1. Re:livin large in KY by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      Louisville was starting to advertise itself as a great place for Internet startups just before the Internet bust came. We still are a great place -- the Internet backbone comes through here (Fort Knox), The Kentucky Derby, U of L (University of Louisville), and 4 hours (by car) or less to three NFL cities (St. Louis Rams, Tennessee Titans, and Cinci Bengals). We may not be as diverse as San Fran, but the cost of living is great!


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
  99. what about staffing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you having trouble finding heads?

    Up here in hancock county, there's only
    a handful of companies that would even employ
    a geek: and they all have openings.

    1. Re:what about staffing? by ChiChiCuervo · · Score: 1

      well all of our staffing needs have been for graphic artists (which portland has buckets of) and customer service reps.

      Besides, this is a one geek shop, and i knew when they asked me to move that they would have extreme difficulty replacing me if they tried.... ;-)

  100. Washington DC -- not cheap by Spoing · · Score: 3
    Just so the rest of the US (and the world for that matter) realizes. Metro DC is congested with traffic (2nd/3rd? worst in nation), and is not cheap.

    That said, send some jobs over here. We need em!

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    1. Re:Washington DC -- not cheap by Phosphor3k · · Score: 0

      Also many of the surounding suburbs (Montgomery County, Fairfax County) have some of the higest costs of living in the country. (Montgomery county is in the top 10.)

    2. Re:Washington DC -- not cheap by rborek · · Score: 1

      Toronto has the 401: the busiest highway in North America (18 lanes of traffic in some areas). Traffic in Toronto beats any other city hands-down for sheer volume and incidences of traffic jams.

  101. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle a World-Class City? Gimme a break. It's Vancouver with less natural beauty and a better road system.

  102. Sandhill Rd is the only true "prestige" address by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The rest of the Bay Area is about proximity to talent. The VCs get some juice from having a Sand Hill Rd address, but for the rest of the companies here, there are real tangible benefits.

    How many other places in the country can you place an ad for an esoteric vertical technology and reasonably expect 100 good resumes??

    1. Re:Sandhill Rd is the only true "prestige" address by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

      Well, in that case, people should be willing to move. If there is such a glut of talent as there appears to be, and people are miserable as they say they are, those without families or many ties in the area should be willing to relocate. And I believe they are! There is just a terrible fear that many IT companies have of being anywhere other than Sillicon Valley, and they need to get over it and quickly. People who want to work badly enough will move, especially if they are young and without families of their own yet. Over here on the East Coast there is no shortage of expereinced workers - and plenty of IT companies have had no problems finding the people they need. People need to break out of the Bay Area. it just doesn't make much sense to be there anymore. Companies need to take a long, hard look at their other options and I don't believe they are.

  103. Additional info... by Drizzten · · Score: 1

    This site has PDFs of the Boyd Company's other industry studies of comparative cost analysis. I'm sure the "Call Centers" and "Help Desks" files will be the most interesting reading. =)

    --

    "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
  104. NOW power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes the Queen is the head of state, but she has now power

    Since when did the queen become a fema-nazi? Unless you were speaking of the band "Queen", or david bowie...

  105. Baltimore by xanthig · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see Baltimore at the top of the list. It's definately one of America's more underrated cities. Cost of living is darn cheap and it has a rather vibrant small business tech community. And besides, if significant migration from Sanfrancisco occours, it will drive up the value of my house :-)

  106. Milwaukee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strangle enough, Milwaukee would be a great choice. It's a hop, skip, jump away from Chicago and it's seems to be more internet freindly. I have friends that live almost in the country area and they can get DSL. I live in a Chicago subburb and can't get DSL.

    1. Re:Milwaukee by xanthig · · Score: 1

      ...and Milwaukee was ranked #1 city in the country for lesbians in 2001!

    2. Re:Milwaukee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they lipstick lesbians or the nasty, butchy ones that have mullets?

  107. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by csbruce · · Score: 3, Informative

    almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan

    You should manage your money a little better. I make over $80K and pay out only 25% for those items.

  108. Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our company HQ is based out of Santa Rosa, CA.. because that's the place to be if you're a telecommunications company... but they've located 99.9% of IT in Salem, Oregon (all servers, brain-power, etc).

    The further away the top-level execs are from people doing real work, the better...

    1. Re:Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I crossed my old man back in Oregon.

  109. Amazing. Negative putz strikes again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it's 26 miles by 8 miles (but that's because it goes past lake thunderbird). If you want to cross Norman quickly use Hwy 9 like you said or Robinson. Do you have any fucking idea how long it took me do drive 13 miles from my apartment in Lewisville (north dallas) to downtown dallas for work every day? 55 minutes. Now I work 30 miles from where I live and it takes 35 minutes. If you're not bright enough to figure out a quicker route thats too bad.

    First you say how Oklahoma sucks and there is nothing there. Then you say how it's too crowded. Make up your mind. Putz.

    1. Re:Amazing. Negative putz strikes again. by TurboRoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For all intents and purposes Norman does not exist as a city past E 24th or past W 48th which is exactly 8 miles. Main street itself is only about 6 miles long. Also.. for all intents and purposes Norman does not exist south of Imhoff road, or north past Rock Creek Road.. Which is 4 miles. Keep in mind the city is kind of on a slant going from northwest to southeast... The city is growing fast tho, it used to not exist north of Robinson.

      Just because other areas are labled as a city doesn't mean a lot if no one actually lives out there. Oklahoma City is the second largest city land wise in the nation if you look at that type of figure. (If you actually look at the populated areas of Oklahoma City, it isn't very big).

      I never said it was crowded. I just used to deliver flowers for a flower shop in Norman when I was 17, "The Norman Floral and Gift Gallery" across the street from Norman High.

      The city planners who worked on Norman are total morans. It is insane to try and make deliveries through the city. Seriously, we had to turn down deliveries any time there was a game day. Even on a normal day, it takes HOURS to make a few deliviers mixed in that 8x4 mile city. Most streets are 25mph, traffic lights are placed every 20 feet down lindsey, pedestrian traffic gets in the way (especially down by OU).

      My argument is simple, even tho Norman is small, hardly populated, and not well known. It really feels like you are in a big crowded city due to the lack of planning.

      It took me just as long to travel to my girlfriends house that was 3 miles away from my work in Norman.. as it currently takes me to travel the 10 miles to work I drive in Oklahoma City, no highway just city streets.

      Ohh, and don't call people names when you are logged in as an AC. :)

  110. FINALLY! by blair1q · · Score: 2

    I've been yelling about this for years.

    There's no reason to be in an expensive place to do this sort of business. It adds nothing to productivity. The only thing it adds is cachet, which only impresses VC's. Hence, what happened.

    The scam is over. Time to get back to work.

    --Blair

  111. eh? by jack+deadmeat · · Score: 1

    I don't know what you're talking ab0ut.

  112. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan (which will by dry in 10-20 years)

    In short, you'll always live confortably. But you'll never have that extra money you need.

    only one airline, and man does it suck

    And I believe it's got $4 billion in debts thanks to the government who wanted to boost the competition but failed.

    yeah, ok - it's a little colder

    Not to worry the pollution will take care of heating us up.

    the healthcare system is spiralling downwards due to funding shortages passed onto the provinces from a sneaky federal government that wants to report a "surplus"

    Quebec receives $4.79 billion in fundings out of the $10 billion. For some reason they still complain about money. British Columbia receives like $200 million out of those $10 billions.

    Thanks to those great roads, you'll need a new car every few years.

  113. Re:Move to Oklahoma, and meet MORONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of living here is SUPER low.. plus.. you can hire VBscript monkies to work on ASP sites for $8/hour.
    Do you mean ASP sites like EBay or HotBot .

    Perhaps if you actually knew what ASP was, you wouldn't come to Slashdot and make such an ass of yourself. ASP != VBScript, ASP is a technology which utilizes one of several scripting languages as well as any compiled componant you choose. That includes VB and C++. PHP, Perl, JSP do not even come close to offering the power and flexibility which ASP offers.

    But let me guess, you are one of thoise illiterate Linux Monkeys who once read that ASP was VBScript so you decided to spew it out again.

    You are probably the best example of why nobody wants to live in Oklahoma.

  114. Third worst traffic in US (DC Metro) by hndrcks · · Score: 1

    We slipped from #2 in 2000. But we have some new draft picks this year, and from what I've seen of their driving, we should be back to #1 in no time.

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
  115. Are these things really that hard to figure out? by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    When our company started, we started in an affordable location, and stayed there. We built on an inexpensive, yet powerful Linux-based infrastructure. We pinched every penny. We never recieved venture capital, but we've been around 3 years, and we're turning profits.

    Our competitors started out in expensive cities. They spent millions on their infrastructure, to impress the investors - and the investors flocked. They burned through several rounds of multi-million-dollar funding, but never really produced anything. Now, they're all out of business or have all 'downsized' and moved to cheaper locations.

    How in the world to people with so little business-sense (or even just plain COMMON financial sense) get in charge of these companies? It never ceases to amaze me that so many people have been (and still are) so STUPID.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  116. Re:blame canada? by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

    Ummmm ... isn't *every* Canadian apartment or house within 2 to 3 minutes of a Tim Horton's? ;]

  117. It isn't *that* bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My apartment (almost 700^2') off the Dulles Tollroad is just over $1000/mo. plus utilities. Cable+ w/HBO and Router is around $100, liquid sunshine for my Jeep is about $1.10/gal. Lots of nice shopping and DC is a nice, safe, 1 hour or so (30 miles) away during rush hour.

    Now, INSIDE DC proper all I hear is complaints about the government, utilities (lack of along with exploding manholes), hassles to the nth power, etc.

    If you come to the DC area decent living is not hard to find down here on the USA side of the river.

    1. Re:It isn't *that* bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dulles tollroad corridor is like living in an industrial area.

      Virginia charges sales tax on medicine and food, and virginia has what they call "the personal property tax", essentially, you pay sales tax once a year on the value of your car.

      The road in virginia suck because they don't believe in bond issues, so something like Route 66 which should be 8-12 lanes is 6 because virginia doesn't like to spend money on roads. Which also means the local transportation grid is a mess, and the house prices in most of Fairfax county are out of control.

      Still, its better than PG county, but the hot ticket in my opinion is to move into DC itself. There's a new pragmatism with Mayor Williams, there are some absolutely fantastic neighborhoods, there's a great subway system, and ironically, traffic in DC is better than the suburbs around it.

      Decent jobs too, although DC is a very straight-laced town.

      Its good, but the suburban traffic is nighmarish.

    2. Re:It isn't *that* bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " virginia has what they call "the personal property tax", essentially, you pay sales tax once a year on the value of your car." that tax is being phased out, and has been lowered 20% per year over the last few years. FYI. At least get the facts straight. Most of the cost was offset by how cheap the car insurance is (compared to places like Philly and Jersey).

  118. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    Better Beer
    I only live a few miles from Canada, but California has the better beer. Sierra Nevada and Anchor Brewing make some of the best beers in the world.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  119. One Other Problem With Quebec by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I found that there's one other major problem with relocating to Quebec. They seem to be very intolerant of outsiders, especially Americans. Every time I've been to Quebec, I was treated very badly, to the point where I decided never to return (things like hotel personnel who spoke English to each other, but when I approached they would only speak French to me, and waiters who ignored me after they discovered from my accent that I was American). Several colleagues of mine were confronted with the same issues. I had no such problems in Toronto.

    Virg

    1. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      It's quite circular. They are treated like shit (frogs, frenchies, made fun of for being drunks, terrible drivers, cultural 'extremeists' .. ) by the Anglophone community, and so they vice-versa it. By this point, its pointless to argue who started it, but just be aware that they are treated very poorly by the english speaking communities in Canada.

      It makes sense here. English speaking Canada seems like its in a rush to dump its own heritage and become, for all intents and purposes, culturally American. The French have AMAZING culture, music, art, etc, so they have every right to try and protect it, but it does tend to end up in inter-cultural tension.

      Oh well. I just hope you can appreciate that Canada treats the francophone community in the same way they treated you. I certainly am not condoning your treatment, but the really do get no respect, despite being on the leading edge of many of the cultural movements that eventually get popularized in the english culture. I can understand the source of their frusteration ..

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      at they are treated very poorly by the english speaking communities in Canada.


      No they arent! What a crock of shit. I've been all OVER this country, and the only place I've ever seen real discrimination over the language spoken is Quebec. My wife speaks fluent French and we can get french service in nearly any large office here in Vancouver and back in Toronto where I am originally from. Just TRY to get service in English from someone in Quebec (outside of Montreal).


      Please don't spout that crap about being "americanized". If "Americanized" means speaking english, fine, but I've seen plenty of purely canadian culture in places like Alberta and Ontario to know that it simply isn't true.

    3. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Examples of these cultural marvels please... Only one I can think of is Poutine... Which I personally, find disgusting.

    4. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Our Quebecois only imagine that they're treated like shit.

      Truth is that money flows from other provinces into Quebec's coffers. I just *love* paying to have them treat me like shit.

      Treated poorly by English Canada? Fuck sakes, they have *no* idea just how endlessly patient and tolerant we've been.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I for one really enjoy visiting Montreal as a tourist at least, and my wife probably would like to consider working up there. However there are some real problems for a long term commitment.
      Here are some issues I considered (pro and con).

      1. (Personal) I'm a researcher and would lose out on U.S. funding. (negative!).
      2. Quebec periodically holds votes on splitting from Canada. The last few times it has been real close. If this measure would pass it could lead to all kinds of economic problems (currency, import/export regulations) and Canada would be divided into 3 parts with 2 governments (east, west and Quebec). (big negative!).
      3. Some people have commented on the freindliness of the French speakers. I think in Montreal, the people are more bilingual and friendly to English speaking tourists (especially if you are respectful). Outside of Montreal, I think they aren't so fond of tourists (but I could be wrong. I feel that a long term resident in any country or city ought to make an attempt to speak the local language. There may be some justification for some irritation over long term residents who refuse to try to speak French.
        (neutral, maybe slightly negative).
      4. Montreal is one of the most international cities I have ever been to (very diverse range of ethnic groups live there).
        (could be a big plus! I wonder about racial tensions though).
      5. It seems safe, but I went as a tourist. Residents may feel differently.
        (big plus, provided residents feel the same).
      6. I don't know about the elementary/secondary education system and other important aspects of Montreal. Perhaps someone who has grown up there or lived there could comment on long term child rearing, etc.
    6. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by insane8 · · Score: 1

      Montreal is a great city, I love living here. I just wanted to comment on the problems you brought up: 1. There is lots of funding to be had here. There are some new tax law that make money spent on reasearch tax exempt. Nortel has cashed in on this recently. 2. Quebec is a very large land mass, we are as big as the whole east coast of the US. there are alot of less inteligent peoples in our northern regions that have never seen an english person and hate the idea of being under an English/Canadian Government. They represent about half of the population but there numbers are dwindeling lately as darwins theory takes it's effect. 3. This is true for the northern regions but not as much for the island of Montreal. Montrealers are usually willing to speak english and those that don't speak it usually understand it (Tv, Internet). 4. Very little racial tention. Some people are a bit ignorant to others backgrounds but they are not trying to be mean in any way. For example, my girlfriend is cambodian but some still insist on refering to her as chineese.. which is like calling a Canadian an American ! =) 5. Very safe almost everywhere, but as with most big citys, there are some bars you just shouldent visit at 3 in the morning. 6. English highschool and elementary school is not as good as it could be. English schools lack funding but if you spend some time looking around you can usually find some schools that receive large amounts of private funding (parents, local companies..etc). The Cégep system is good and bad. I would say that it's good for discouraged/less-fortunate students but worse for those that wish to goto university. You can goto Cégep for very little money (240$ CAD /year) and allows you to get a pretty good eduaction but if you were planning on going to university anyways, it just adds an extra year you have to spend in school. Montreal is a unique place to live, there are all of the big city comforts along with a very low cost of living and great culture. Oh, and for those that are not married/involved with someone, the women here are better than any other place I have been with the exception of Iceland.

    7. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Quebec periodically holds votes on splitting from Canada. The last few times it has been real close. If this measure would pass it could lead to all kinds of economic problems (currency, import/export regulations) and Canada would be divided into 3 parts with 2 governments (east, west and Quebec). (big negative!).
      The USA is separated in two (the other part being Alaska) by Canada running in the middle, so what is the problem????
      Some people have commented on the freindliness of the French speakers. I think in Montreal, the people are more bilingual and friendly to English speaking tourists (especially if you are respectful). Outside of Montreal, I think they aren't so fond of tourists (but I could be wrong. I feel that a long term resident in any country or city ought to make an attempt to speak the local language. There may be some justification for some irritation over long term residents who refuse to try to speak French. (neutral, maybe slightly negative).
      Perhaps it is the yankee's assumption that everyone in the world speaks english and refusal to recognize that the opposite is true?
      Montreal is one of the most international cities I have ever been to (very diverse range of ethnic groups live there). (could be a big plus! I wonder about racial tensions though). It seems safe, but I went as a tourist. Residents may feel differently.
      As a 40 year resident, I haven't seen racial tensions. Racism just isn't in the french culture like it is in the anglo-saxon.

      And having been in the receiving end of racism for so long (the french in Canada are treated just like the blacks are in the US) does wonder in making sure you're not racist.

      When the klu-klux-klan tried to setup shop in Montréal some 12 years ago, the neighbours routed them out with baseball bats and generous kicks in the ass. They vanished under the rock they crawled from, never to be seen again...

      What few racial tensions there are more likely to come from immigrants who have been told by the federal government that Québec is english and are suddenly surprised, when they arrive, to find out that it is french.

      And other racial tensions come from the ineptness of the federal government immigration policies who will do blatantly stupid things like house a boatload of turkish refugees in a predominantly greek neighbourhood; in that case, the ethnic tensions are strictly constrained within the ethnic communities...

      Otherwise, for the french it is considered good to date someone who is of a different race, but, again, the whites find themselves discriminated against by the immigrants... (It's **HARD** to date orientals!!!!)

      I don't know about the elementary/secondary education system and other important aspects of Montreal. Perhaps someone who has grown up there or lived there could comm
      School is absolutely *free* until college, and then college is dirt-cheap (on the order of $800-$1200 per semester) for top-notch universities (does the name "Mc-Gill" rings a bell?).

      You can become a medical doctor for less than $50,000 (and I'm not talking US dollars)...

  120. *cough cough* by Drizzten · · Score: 1

    Mmm, British Columbia...with it's Marijuana Party, large cannabis clubs, and high pot tolerance, not to mention everything else.

    I've always liked that part of the continent...

    --

    "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
  121. IT company vs. employee location paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    one thing that many have noticed is the very large number of employees that are unhappy with many locations of IT companies. While telecommuting has provided a very good solution to some of these, the issue has not been addressed for the company at large, and appears as if many decision makers are afraid of finding out the true number of unhappy employers. (Note that this does include those who want to telecommute but can't because of the company's limit or lack of telecommuting slots, or perhaps a technological issue (connectivity, security, etc))

    The question that needs to be asked is: "Why does an entire company need to be 'near the business'?" I have personally never heard a good answer to this, considering the facts presented. Many 'reasons' too be located in the center of activity are not mutually exclusive with reasons not to be, or perhaps are simply overruled by basic givens of the situation at large and past performance. As an example, take a large IT company that claims that they must be in the center of the business, like in the DC area, more specifically in a dense concrete jungle of bad traffic and long commutes to work (long time, not really distance) because of COL prices in the area. In reality, that IT company most likely does more work outside the area it is housed in (perhaps most of it international). Perhaps even there are other of that company's locations that are distant, yet those distant locations often are the ones with the business that is in the same area as this business location. That makes no sense really, but it does happen quite frequently. When you look at government contracts (the stated reason for a DC location normally) you find that the actual work is done far away and with DoD often overseas. You end up with the realization soon that it apparently does not matter at all where you are located on the actual productivity side of things. However, there is a need for marketing types and liason types to be near the equivelent customer types like that. Yet again, reality is much different then this, as most companies house a significant portion of customer interaction personnel in locations far away from the customer.

    Perhaps it is just another example of an initial good idea not having critical thought applied to it (not thought through) coupled with inefficient processes, incompetent decision makers and confused middle management.

    So the real lessons... the long term lessons should be looked at here in detail. Moving a large company to another location is not cheap by any means. Add to that the initial cost that drove them away, and sprinkle on top the very real possibility that the same situation will happen again in the new location, and you are left with a nice recipe for disaster. No number of degrees, powerpoint slides, meetings, fancy talking, buzz words or that typical management pseudo-busy pacing is going to change that. (pseudo-busy pacing referring to when they think that ANY work, regardless of efficiency and relevancy to the needed work is performed just to say 'yeah we did something', much like a mouse in a wheel)

    A smart business person will not get so wrapped up in desires that they only look at red tape policies and not real results. Company picnics and cool looking golf shirts will not keep employees happy, especially if they feel that their decision makers are more interested in tricking and manipulating their employees (through picnics, shirts and other false moral raisers). Most employees at non management levels I have ever interacted with where indeed interested in moving forward and producing good work. It is only when treated like thieves and criminals that they began to exhibit the complacent and lackadasical attitude that the managers seemed to 'expect'. I am thinking that decision makers need to stop following the crowd so much. If a company decides to make a medium sized campus out in 'the boonies' and it works well, I fully expect that the brainless sheep of many other companies would mimic this, while not trully understanding the real reasons, motivations and desires of the remote location move in the first place. next thing you see will be a very popular trend to open up massive campuses in the middle of farm country, and added to that you will find they stupidly flock together (like sheep) in the same locations, creating more big cities and the same problem that caused the employees to leave in the first place. (thus resulting in the 'new move')

    its not that hard people, you just gotta stop worshiping processes and use your brain.

  122. But you missed... by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2
    Supply of workers. If you go to Nowheresville because rent is cheap (because there is no existing high-tech to drive up prices), you are going to find that there aren't any high-tech people there to hire. You are going to have to hire them from elsewhere, and you are going to have to pay BIG relocation bonuses. Then you have the problem of hiring people who are going to look at the locale and see that moving there gives them absolutely zero options if they decide they don't like working for you. The result is that you are not going to get many takers unless you spend a lot of money. Poof! go your savings.

    It's probably going to be a lot easier for companies to move a relatively short distance, like SF to Sacramento. This gives the workers a lot more options if they decide to reconsider in the short term, and the influx of high-tech companies means that the deficit of employment options is going down rapidly.

    1. Re:But you missed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relocation bonuses??? "Move or lose your job" sounds like a great bonus. As does "Take a cut in pay or lose your job" right about now.

  123. Come to Hampton Roads VA by i0nic · · Score: 1

    Plenty of cheap labor and living is cheap. The only problem is the ridiculous taxation and the over zealous police force.

    1. Re:Come to Hampton Roads VA by WirelessFreak · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could be more specific. Hampton Roads is a region with several cities within: Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Newport News, Hampton, Chesapeake, Suffolk, Yorktown, Williamsburg, etc...

      Taxation pretty much sucks statewide (especially with the $3.2 billion deficit) but each entity has its own police force.

  124. Where is this lack of tolerance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the majority of the country just doesn't care about somebody's sexual preference. This would be my definition of "tolerance" but in Bay Area parlance "tolerance" is when your demographic wields significant political power disproportionate to the actual size of the demographic. Consider me wacky but I think it is going to require more than a change in "attitude" that is going to allow the Bay Area to replicate that definition of tolerance.

    1. Re:Where is this lack of tolerance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry man, but the majority of the country does care about people's sexual preference. All the protests over gay marriage is proof of that, and don't think it is just a minority of homophobes either, just about every survey taken on the issue in this country has shown something like 60+% of respondents being against same-sex marriage and some states the numbers were close to 80% oppossed.

    2. Re:Where is this lack of tolerance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A difference of opinion over what the legal definition of marriage should be is not intolerance.

      Intolerance is "We don't let no queers code no queer perl code here. Take your faggot regular expressions back to your gay pride parade."

  125. NO!!! by Fnord · · Score: 2

    I just escaped DC last year. I grew up in that pit of a city and last year successfully escaped to a job in Seattle (a really great place to live if anyone is interested). Well, two months ago I got laid off and now I'm watching all the jobs here slowly dissapear and companies are moving away one by one. And where are they moving to? ARGH! I really don't want to go back to DC......

    1. Re:NO!!! by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      Three cheers for being jobless in seattle! woop woop hurrah!

  126. COst of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You diseased creatures are so obvlivious to the truth, you can't even see the folly of your own unsustainable lifestyle.

    It doesn't matter where you relocate, if all you do once you get there is build build build, grow grow grow. You have the same effect on the local enonomy, no matter what part of the world you are in. An influx of highly paid workers causes the existing local markets to realize they can demand and get higher prices for what they are selling - be it houses, rent, gasoline, groceries, you name it. Yeah I just paid 450 thousand for a house that would sell for 95 thousand tops in Tucumare NM. So what. THe company I work at pays me enough to afford it. The (former) owner of the house knows this, so he asks as much as possible for the place, knowing I have no choice but to pay it. What else is he going to do, give me a break and let me have it for $1.98 just because I'm such a nice guy? That's not the way you creatures operate. It's not in your nature. It's not the way your brains work.

    Meanwhile, there aren't enough existing houses to support the mass migration into the area, so local landowners and developers take advantage of the situation by doing what they do best: raping the land, building condo's and townhouses piled on top of each other so closely you can hear your neighbors chewing their Wheaties at the breakfast table in the morning. But does the expansion of available housing cause prices to fall? Nope! The rest of the community hops on board, riding on the coattails, milking it for all it's worth.

    So where does it end, guys? WHen there is absolutely NO MORE LAND available to build new houses and Big Box malls? When we all make 6 million dollars a year, and cracker-box houses cost 4.5 million each, and cars cost 125 thousand used, and your cable TV/broadband bill is 3000 dollars a month?

    Cost of business, indeed.
    You figure it out.

  127. .. have to learn to say the word "eh?" by apankrat · · Score: 1

    You would be surprised to learn that there is well-developed IT industry in Canada. Moreover, given flexible immigration policies and special government programs for attracting IT specialists (so-called EFW Pilot Project) there are literally thousands of developers/admins coming into the country from Eastern Europe, India and China each year. These people are very well skilled, most of them have Master degrees (due to immigration requirements) and majority of them beats local college graduates in efficiency, professionalism and industry experience. And unlike most of southerners newcomers are not hot for big bucks and will accept decent jobs for less. In other words, do expect competition ... and that's apart from being paid in canadian dollars :)

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  128. Philadelphia by zensmile · · Score: 1

    Same thing here in Philadelphia...just a little different slant. People who live OR work in Philadelphia have to pay a wage tax as high as 5 percent. It comes right outta your check. No ifs, ands, or buts. Many young techies (and not so young) have fled the city to the burbs, where new office parks rule. Why would anyone want to give Philly any of their cash when they live and pay taxes in another city? And for the folks that live in Philadelphia, why pay 5 percent when you are taxed to death on everything else? I live in Philly and think about moving every payday.

    With all of the tech industries leaving the city, Philadelphia is rapidly becoming a tech dead zone.

    1. Re:Philadelphia by slykens · · Score: 2
      I live in Philly and think about moving every payday.

      This makes a common point about a lot of cities in Pennsylvania. I live in State College, none of the municipalities here have been able to pass consolidation so we're still a bunch of little governments. I live in Patton Township where my wage tax is 1%, but the borough of State College is 1.8%. One local business (Accuweather) moved to Ferguson Township to escape the borough's business taxes. (Along with building a new building a few years ago, but taxes were a factor as I understand it)

      The point is that a lot of cities/municipalities have higher taxes than those nearby. Whatever you do don't move to Maryland. Not only are taxes higher there but your rights mean nothing to the state government.

      The government in PA and in Pittsburgh has been talking a lot about trying to make Pittsburgh into a tech city to help make up for the problems in the steel industry. PA's state income tax is 2.8%, and sales tax is 6% on non-necessity items. No yearly personal property tax on cars and the like, altho your house will be taxed by the local government. Another poster mentioned the "Small Business Bribery Zones" that the gov't has put in place as well. Basically, you move your business into one of the development zones and pay no state taxes for 10 years. Woo.

    2. Re:Philadelphia by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      I wholeheartedly agree with you, the wage tax FUCKING SUCKS. It's about a $2000 chunk out of my ass every year. My last employer didn't deduct it automatically, so I had to pay it myself quarterly. Writing a $500 check to the city every three months was like passing a kidney stone.

      If moving wasn't such a huge hassle, and if I didn't already own my current house, I'd move to just outside the city limits in a heartbeat and enjoy the thousands of dollars in wage tax and car insurance savings.

      ~Philly

  129. Re:In the words of the immortal Geddy Lee of Rush. by Malic · · Score: 1

    You writing that and me understanding it makes us both look very old. =)

    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  130. I herd of dat lectricity tang, but it be evil! by DarND · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't let go of that attitude and make sure to tell all your friends about how bad it was in ND.
    Make sure you mention the horrible things like wide open plains, warm summers, clean air, stable jobs, low crime rate, friendly people and low cost of living. Qwest provides service including DSL for the Fargo area. If you don't like DSL, go with a cable modem because yes we have those too. Fargo also has wireless access from Monet. Dickinson and the surrounding towns have Consolidated Communications which provides DSL and cable modems as well. I'm not exactly sure where you were, but the things you're describing are a complete opposite of what I've experienced.

    Now after saying that... Stay out cause we don't want no strangers round these parts! Ma fetch me mah shotgun!

    1. Re:I herd of dat lectricity tang, but it be evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, this is rich.

      I lived in ND for too many years (read nine) and I have a real problem when I run across Northern Plains Apologists like this gent.

      Let's see...

      Make sure you mention the horrible things like wide open plains...

      ...which you have a lot of, because the population has fallen from 600,000 state wide over the past few years. Why? Read on.

      ...warm summers...

      ...which you can't really go out in because of a brutal mosquito problem. Unless, of course, you haven't got a problem the diseases those little critters carry?

      ...stable jobs...

      I roared when I read this. By "stable" do you mean "you-work-three-jobs-to-make-ends-meet", as in Grand Forks, or "you-work-as-your-bosses'-tool-no-questions-asked" as in Fargo?

      Seriously, one of the primary reasons people leave ND is because of the LACK of good work.

      ...low crime rate...

      Another point near and dear to my heart.

      I worked with the Grand Forks police for four years in the early nineties. Let's just say that the crime rate is much higher than is reported, shall we?

      Seriously, it's a state with no entertainment activity value at all. Don't take my word for it; research Grand Forks in one of those Fortune magazine city reviews. On a scale of 1-100, entertainment value is a whopping 2. When people have nothing to do they tend to get a tad rowdy...see where I'm going?

      Low crime. What a joke.

      ...friendly people...

      Uh, I married a Nodak, and moved her around the world with me. Even she is the first to say that the people are, as a whole, the coldest, meanest people she's ever encountered.

      low cost of living

      ...if you're used to Silicon Valley. But the TRUTH is that it's actually just as expensive to live in Chicago or Minneapolis as it is to live in Grand Forks or Fargo. As you can well imagine, that isn't a point that most ND businesses want advertised.

      There are nice things about North Dakota. It's flat, it has great farm land, and you can leave. Aside from that, it's best left alone.

      Have a nice day!

  131. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

    And I believe it's got $4 billion in debts thanks to the government who wanted to boost the competition but failed.

    No, it's got $4b in debts because they would rather compete EVERYWHERE than where the money is. They run routes at 10% capaticy just because other airlines run them. They don't realize that not running a plane is cheaper than running it for two people (though it's nice to be able to get seat upgrades when First Class is empty).

    The government allowing competition is great, but Air Canada forgets that it's not the only player in town. It needs to clean up its act, focus more on the profitable routes, and start cutting out waste.

    --Dan

  132. Montreal by pmancini · · Score: 2

    Actually Montreal is a world class city. It is clean, beautiful and has the best resturants and strip clubs I have ever been to. ;-)

    I highly recommend the city to visit. Also, they party much harder there than say Boston or even Nashville where I currently make my home. Nashville is cheap to live in and has a small but growing high-tech sector. Sprint made the big jump to Kansas City and a small leap to Nashville from Chicago. It's the right thing to do, in my opinion. Spread the wealth I say.

    1. Re:Montreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I thought I replied to this earlier,but as someone who has visited Montreal and contemplates living there,I have some questions/issues:
      • Potential Advantages
        • Montreal is a really international city, with a wonderful cultural mix. (Only a concern if race infighting were to somehow erupt there).
        • Very safe and clean for such a large city.
        • Some of the best dining anywhere.
        • Many cultural activities.

      • Potential Disadvantages
        • Quebec has been voting every few years on whether it wants to split from Canada. Although the spearatists have not won, they are getting progressivly closer to winning and the margin is narrow. If the separatists win, I think the economic consequences to Quebec and Canada would be pretty bad.
        • Research dollars are more limited in Canada,I'm a researcher in the U.S.
        • Canada is Cold (bothers my wife more than me).

      • Concerns/Neutral Issues
        • A number of people suggested that the French Canadians are not friendly to English speakers. I've visited Montreal a few times and found this not to be true (although it was pretty clear I was a tourist and they like reespectful tourists there), outside Montreal, it is possible that the French Canadians are not as fond of tourists or English speakers. I think if I lived there (like any other major city) I'd have to make a real effort to learn the language and that even in Montreal, their patience would wear thin if I didn't at least try to speak some French.
        • I have a young daughter and I'm not sure of the primary/secondary education system's quality in Montreal/Quebec.

  133. No big surprise really... by PantyChewer · · Score: 1

    Take at look at this report: http://www.competitivealternatives.com/main.htm to see how costs compare in different cites. Canada is at the top of the pack for best places to do business. And Edmonton (home of companies like Bio-ware) is the #1 city, though not even mentioned in the other article...

    1. Re:No big surprise really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edmonton is not too bad to work in actually....But it's not very pleasent place to be if you happen you be a minority.......

  134. My plug for my home state by stoothman · · Score: 1
    I will put in a plug for high tech companies to move to Iowa. I will say this about the state. The state has reasonable taxes, not to high and not so low that services suffer. The public schools are some of the top in the nation. And in my own humble opinion, there is also no better place in the country to raise children. Iowa is home to one of the premier engineering universities in the country and birth place of the digital computer, Iowa State University. Iowa is also home to one of the premier medical research universities in the nation, University of Iowa. Iowa is home to some the world's largest insurance and financial services companies, and because of this has a very technically savvy workforce. The people are friendly, polite and have that midwestern work ethic down to a science. The prices for real estate are quite low. The prices for building are quite low. And the prices for ongoing expenses are quite low. Iowa also has a excellent communications and transportation infrastructure.


    I know you are all asking yourselves if it so great why everyone not located in Iowa. Yes, there is a downside. Chief and foremost right now is Iowa's winter, cold and snow and more cold, though it is warmer than Minneapolis. Second, gettting into and out of the state by airplane is a bit vexing at times. But this is really a chicken and egg problem. We cannot get better air service without more demand, and we cannot get more demand without better air service. So you might have to "bite the bullet" for a while and pay a little more for plane tickets. Finally, while there is a lot to do in Iowa, there is not always something going 24 hours a day, like there is in the big cities. For me persoanally I consider that a blessing as it leads to a life with a much more relaxing pace.


    Oh and I almost forgot a benefit, at least for those in Silicon Valley, NO EARTHQUAKES :-)


    For more information:
    Iowa Dept. of Economic Development


    A coder in Iowa
    stoothman

  135. omg... by gatesh8r · · Score: 1
    "Say, maybe you and Ole should'a look at dat o'er there, eh, don'tcha know?" "Yip, you betcha!"


    One thing I don't want to hear out of tech support or my surgon... :-P

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  136. For those that have seen the South Park Movie by spruce · · Score: 1

    What are you talking aboot?

    1. Re:For those that have seen the South Park Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What cracks me up the most is that South Park is actually a spoof on how Americans see Canadians, and the Yanks just gobble it all up. In the end, the jokes on you.

      P.S. Need any hockey tips?

    2. Re:For those that have seen the South Park Movie by spruce · · Score: 1

      Some of us Yanks were able to comprehend the deep levels of humor.

      And no, you and Mr. Gretzky can keep all your hockey tips on the insecure side on the border.

  137. Supply and Demand by pinkUZI · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Calm down everyone!
    This is an age old cycle. High demand for realestate in SF = higher prices being charged for rent. Now that demand is down the prices are going to fall and new tenants will go there.
    Nothing to worry about so long as the government stays out of it and doesn't do something stupid with rentals like they did with utilities.

    --
    You are receiving this message because your browser supports Slashdot Sigs and you have Slashdot Sigs enabled.
  138. Canada's looking real good by maxpublic · · Score: 2

    Hey, now I can not only retain some of my basic human rights - but I can get a job too! Just how hard is it to become a Canadian citizen, eh?

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:Canada's looking real good by hether · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    2. Re:Canada's looking real good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, by all means, help yourself and get the fuck out of here.
      This country was not designed to be a heaven for freeloaders and whiners.
      I am sure you will feel more comfortable somewhere else.

  139. Re:Move to Oklahoma, and meet MORONS by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

    Blah blah blah, ok... "VBScript monkies working on ASP sites."

    What from that statement says that ASP only supports VBScript?

    The truth is, VBScript monkies are the least expensive people you can purchase, err hire to work on ASP sites.

    At least we don't have morons who can't read.

  140. Skilled Workers by Rice-Pudding · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They claim that a city will do well if they install a broadband communications network that connects citizens, local businesses and the global marketplace.

    Sure, but there is another factor that is important for high-tech companies that Gartner is missing: skilled workers.

    I work for a company that has one of its offices in Edmonton, AB, Canada. Why Edmonton? Let's see:
    • Canadian dollar paychecks for employees
    • cheaper costs for business infrastructure
    • University of Alberta in Edmonton provides quality engineering talent.
    • And yes, high-speed internet.


    The third point there is very important. Yes, it is possible to attract SV engineers to Edmonton, but it takes a *lot* of effort and incentive. One major problem is that a SV engineer may sell a bungalow for $600,000 USD. In Edmonton, you can get a mansion for $200,000 USD; there are no houses to be bought for $600K. So the SV engineer suddenly has $400K to pay taxes on.

    So, the vast majority of people in R&D are local-area Canadians.
    1. Re:Skilled Workers by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      In Edmonton, you can get a mansion for $200,000 USD; there are no houses to be bought for $600K.

      For accuracy's sake ...

      1) "mansions" in Edmonton are worth a *lot* more than USD$200K

      2) there are some houses here in the *millions* of USD$s

      3) as everywhere, it's: location, location, location

      Why do I know this? None of *my* neighbours have mansions. ;-)

  141. Re:blame canada? by mindKMST · · Score: 1

    Yes, every Canadian apartment is within 2 to 3 minutes of a Tim Hortons. After spending two weeks in Canada this summer I never want to see another Tim Hortons. Krispy Kreme kicks the krap out of Tim Hortons. Come on, what is with those tiny little pieces of bread and meat they call sandwhiches.

  142. Amerika is SCREWED by Alban+Caradoc · · Score: 1

    What ya'll should really be worried about isn't tech jobs leaving the Bay Area for DC or Oklahoma or some other podunk place....the transnational globalists have transferred all the jobs to India and East Europe and China to hire educated people who work for peanuts by Western standards.

  143. Draft dodging / Security Dodging. by FooMasterZero · · Score: 1

    If they move to Canada how would that effect the eminent security policies of the US ?

    Even if the company is US owned they reside in another country that still means the US company abides to local laws, so maybe they are getting out because they don't want to hassle with DMCA and such, and the whole its too expensive is a cover up. Because we all know if companies want to reduce cost the just pass the buck(s) on to consumer to make up for thier lack of cash.

    anyways just a thought, things aren't always what they seem.

  144. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    Or a Newfie!

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  145. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get that stupid net out of your hair you stupid shitheaded troll

    1 j4x0r0x0r3d j0000
    pj33r mu4 1337 5k1zzn1ll35

  146. Dallas or Houston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Dallas, Tx is the largest IT market in the USA.

    Houston, Tx IT market is almost as large as Dallas.

    Both have extremely low cost of living and doing business.

    3000 square foot NEW house close to town in Houston costs $150k.

    Contrary to stereotypes, almost all Texans live in Dallas, Houston, Austin, or San Antonio.

    The funny thing is that San Francisco governemnt is correcting the overpopulation by raising the costs of living/business so that people/businesses leave...this corrects the high cost of living problem...

    Another rare piece of actual economics talk of 'supply and demand' on /.

    1. Re:Dallas or Houston by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      What is the property tax on that 3000 square foot new house that cost $150k?

    2. Re:Dallas or Houston by jsmith_250 · · Score: 1

      I've got a 2100 SQF, $130K house and I pay about $2300 / YR. This does depend of where you live. I'm in a nice side of town but some of the nicer suburbs can be a bit more. There is a state law the caps taxes out at 3% of your homes value.

    3. Re:Dallas or Houston by jsmith_250 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Houston and love it. No state icome tax, and the cost of living is really low.

    4. Re:Dallas or Houston by ScumBiker · · Score: 2

      Just as a comparison, we're buying a newer (4 year old) house just outside of Madison, WI. It's 2200 square feet, the lot is 110'x500' (yep, damn huge lot) 3/4 of which is tree covered. We're paying $199,100 for the house and expect to pay $5000 per year property tax. Did I mention I finally get a 2 car garage? WOOHOO! A place to store motorcycles! Oh yea, there's a house attached to the garage...

      Ya know, Wisconsin is overlooked by a lot of companies. Where do you think Cray is from? Yes, I know Cray is tanking. They made some dumb business moves. That doesn't mean that their tech isnt' any good though. There's a lot of smart people here with decent wages. Outside of Madison and Milwaukee, it's real cheap to live. The house I was talking about before could probably be had in La Crosse for $110k or so.

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  147. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by LordNimon · · Score: 1
    lack of world class cities and attractions

    Toronto blows away anything we have here in Texas, I can assure you. In fact, Toronto is probably the only city I'd consider visiting just to see what's there.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  148. My company did this! by justinstreufert · · Score: 2, Informative
    The company I work for moved from posh, high-tech Northern Virginia to York, PA. York is a sad, sad city. Almost everyone is white, almost no one has an open mind and the main attractions are the Harley Davidson factory and the Hooters. Culinary choices range from Arby's to Old Country Buffet. The local strip mall is almost devoid of actual places to buy anything.

    Needless to say, I live 2 hours away and telecommute!

    The reason they moved there, of course, is that this part of York has extremely poor economics and is being targeted for "growth" by the government. They have established an Official Small Business Bribery Zone and give us tax breaks and free services. Woohoo!

    Justin

    --
    "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
    1. Re:My company did this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The horror of living someplace where everyone's white! You poor pathetic thing. Why don't you quit and move to some nigger infested shithole in the South? I'm sure you'll be much happier there.

  149. Northern Iowa by hether · · Score: 2

    My area is trying to promote economic development and the tech sector would do great up here. Take a place that has DSL and T-1s available, plenty of space to build or buildings to take over, a willing community that is eagerly accepting new business and even offering incentives, houses that cost $20-$40k on average, good schools systems, etc. and you have a very alluring place for people to come work. A local sofware company in Bancroft, IA also has a California branch. They offer their employees the choice of which they want to work at. Lately more have chosen Bancroft - especially those with families. Not as good an option for companies that need quick access to airports and major shipping routes, or for people who really need a good nightlife, but for many software or internet cos it would be great.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:Northern Iowa by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1

      What kind of house can you buy for $20-$40K?

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    2. Re:Northern Iowa by hether · · Score: 2

      I just looked a few up to make sure my range was right. It depends on which town you choose. The slightly bigger towns are higher. For $18.5K you can get a two bedroom with CA and hardwood floors on a 60 x 132 lot. Only 800 sq. ft. but still very nice. For $35k you can get an acreage (2.5 acres) 3 bedroom property. If you want to spend a little more, for $70k you can get a 1700sq ft on each level, two fire place, two car garage home. I'd give the links to some of the realtors, but I don't want to slashdot any of them. Just do a search.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    3. Re:Northern Iowa by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

      "Not as good an option for companies that need quick access to airports and major shipping routes, or for people who really need a good nightlife," or culture, or decent weather (what is the temp today?), or something other than corn.

      Now if we were talking Cedar Rapids / Iowa City then you have..... uh..... well an airport and I-80.

      Just kidding (sorta) spent the first 20 yrs of my life in CR/IC. Now in Phoenix (73 degrees today) were we are getting LOTS of people and companies fleeing CA. Driving up home prices big time.

    4. Re:Northern Iowa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nightlife and 'culture' are overrated if you don't want to spend your non-working hours in a drunken stupor. If not, then stay in CA and keep that state fucked up.

  150. Hawaii! by Epsas · · Score: 1

    Companies are finally feeling the budget pinch caused by doing business in NYC, Seattle or San Fran? Come to your senses and move to Hawaii! Hawaii has a warm, beautiful climate and some of the best karma on the planet. Unlike other parts of the USA, the people on the islands are genuinely kind-hearted and friendly to each other. - As long as you pack a sense of common decency along with your swimming trunks you will be treated as Ohana. The cost-of-living is not as extreme as popular legend would demand - there are many people who comfortably survive here making less than $30K a year. Think of what your high-caliber IT wage can do here. Think of how much more value your expensive IT employees will find in their paycheck. And yes, there is bandwidth and lots of it. A rich social ecology of Native, Asian, Pacific and European culture exists here. Not only is the food great (the best sushi in the US), but the level of cultural diversity is intoxicating to the average Western mind. There's nothing like walking through the park in the morning and passing by a group of Chinese seniors moving through their Tai-Chi exercises, and strolling back through it in the evening to the sounds of a practicing Samoan choir. There is a small, but growing, technical community in the islands - which has it's plusses: The technical community that does exist is small, active and very supportive of each other. Most Importantly, people don't yawn when you tell them that you program for a living. :) At the moment, The Hawaiian economy is economically addicted to the Military and Tourism. Without solid alternative industries, the islands will become stagnant with the transient natures of it's current economic benefactors. - The politicians of Hawaii are slowly coming to their senses about this, and are starting to listen to reason instead of to their campaign contributions. Because of this, there has never been a better time to move your venture to Hawaii. The govmn't of the islands are actively seeking Tech Companies to move to the Islands, and provide great financial incentives to businesses wishing to migrate and to the entrepeneurs willing to build here. There has never been a better time to move your venture to "paradise." -- Apologies to the Hawaiian Sovereignty People who may be reading this...

    1. Re:Hawaii! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way! I heard a story about how some guy met a girl in a bar in hawaii, slept with her, and then woke up in the bathtub of his hotel room packed in ice with the words "call 911" scrawled in lipstick on the mirror. THEY TOOK HIS LIVER!!!!!

  151. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

    The better beer generally considers only the mass market beers, as microbrews are an entirely different ballgame.

    Of course, when you're comparing urine to urine, does it really matter which is better? Molson or Bud, they're both fecking close to water.

    Although, I did actually try a Budweiser last month, and I didn't realize how apt the joke was, when applied to Bud. Molson, at least, looks somewhat orangey-yellow. Bud was pale, pale, PALE straw yellow. I was dumbstruck.

    Of course, I'm also a guiness drinker.

  152. San Francisco's "Housing Farce" by cornflux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For anyone interested in San Francisco's rent situation, you might find these two articles, by Thomas Sowell, to be interesting: The Housing Farce and The Housing Farce, Part II.

  153. 'white flight' nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White flight is nonsense in today's society.

    No one wants to live in a high crime, low education, bad schools, etc. area of town...especially non-whites.

    'White flight' is nonsense created by alleged leaders who want some issue to give soundbites on and to get elected.

  154. First off who cares if i'm logged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you worry about your karma then your pathetic. Apparently you haven't been to Norman recently. The town isn't slanted either. Look at a fucking map moron. The middle of town is slanted. This is because the original downtown area was lined up to the railroad and not east west. Here's a map

    Do you see the slant in the middle? That isn't the entire town. Lindsay is that way because the students. It is essentially a residential area. Would you like people driving 55 through your neighborhood? If you worked at a flower shop across from Norman High my guess is that was 10 to 15 years ago. Earl's has long since moved. Also norman has significant growth past 24th avenue (which is another indication you dont have a fucking clue what you're talking about). Did you not notice the Norman North High school? Wonder what thats for. I guess the non existent people of North Norman. With a population of around 100,000 there is no way you can have an area as you describe and have no crowding. The difference between Norman and other large cities is you may be going 25 mph but like you said it's only 4 miles. So that shouldnt take too long.

    Yes Norman is crowded but my arguement is that it has all the same things everyone wants in a big city with significantly less hassle. So before you start bad mouthing Oklahoma go live in a hellhole like Dallas. Christ Dallas is 10 degrees hotter than Austin as an average temperature in the summer because there are NO trees, all concrete. In other words if you dont like it get the fuck out. It's cheap to hire a U-Haul/Ryder Truck. And since we are soooo poor you can hire movers for cheap too. My guess is you bitch about it but are too lazy to do something about it.

    1. Re:First off who cares if i'm logged in by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      Heh, this is the last time I reply to an AC.. but the slant I was refering to was the build up of homes in the northwest and southeast part which was keeping the city from correctly depicted by X/Y dimensions.

      But the reason it takes soo long to get anywhere isn't so much the speed limits, it is the stop lights.. stop signs, stupid driviers, stupid people on bikes, stupid people walking around, streets that confuse people so they have to stop and figure out what they are doing...

      Second, the shop I worked at was not Earls. .I said the name, "Norman Floral and Gift Gallery.". It was sold to some ladies who ran the place out of business. This was just 4 years ago. If anyone received flowers from the long hair hippy dude driving the big floral and gift gallery van... that was me :)

      Norman north was built for the specific purpose so rich people could send their kids to a school without poor people. I remember when it was built looking at the dividing line between who went to Norman North and who didn't. Pretty corrupt stuff. Of course, this is why all new schools are built anymore so Norman North is no exception.

      But ever so, if you read my other posts, you would see the only reason I haven't moved away from Oklahoma is because I am defiently too lazy.

      Moving costs, having to find a new job, getting new family and friends.. yawn. It is just more fun to try and improve where I live. Which I try to do, right now I am involved in a movement to BOOT OUT those stupid people that keep whoring themselves out to big corporations.

      The brick town Stadium cost us 88 MILLION taxpayer dollars to make in downtown OKC. It only cost Cox communications 1.5 million to purchase the naming rights.

      Similar deals went with the ballpark, myriad, etc. Tax payer dollars paid for it all, yet stupid corporations got the naming rights for dirt cheap. I mean, if SW Bell wanted a ball park, they should of PAID for one.

  155. Boeing - selfish corporate executives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They went to Chicago instead of Dallas because Chicago had one of the great lakes and Dallas didn't.

    I wonder if Chicago was economically better than Dallas. Probabally not given higher cost of living and taxes...

  156. Dallas Fort Worth Cheap by Mittermeyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of the high-tech growth in the DFW area has been fueled by cheap land and a corresponding cheap workforce. A $300,000 two-bedroom cramped house in CA gets you near mansions here. In addition there are quite a few workers here dumped by the dotcom/telecom bust that drive hiring prices down. Plenty of electrical power here. There is no personal income tax in Texas, a real selling point for a million-plus executive looking to shelter his nest egg. Finally Texas cities often give tax breaks like depressed Southern states to lure business here.

    That's not to say that price is the only factor. For instance until the last fifteen years DFW didn't really have enough of the highly specialized building contractors that make computer room sites. That's something you're not going to get everywhere.

    Also proximity to what counts drives many location moves. DFW probably lost getting the Boeing HQ because it was not as close to Washington DC as Chicago (since Boeing business is largely driven by what happens with the DOD and FAA), and I suspect because of the lack of world-class four-year colleges and cultural opportunities.

    For folks who live for SanFran it will be irreplacable. But for bottom-line folks other locales beckon.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  157. See you in Banff! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Some places in Canada like Victoria BC and Banff are so gorgious I'd move there in a sec.

    Before anyone knocks curling please take a look at a very popular sport that is even more ridiculous and very popular in the US called GOLF. Curling requires far less space also.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  158. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by csbruce · · Score: 2

    And I believe it's got $4 billion in debts thanks to the government who wanted to boost the competition but failed.

    My understanding is that Air Canada negotiated hefty deals with its unions and suppliers when it thought it would own the sky, but then the industry went into decline and then Sept. 11th happened.

  159. Hawaii! (With Proper Formatting!) by Epsas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Companies are finally feeling the budget pinch caused by doing business in NYC, Seattle or San Fran? Come to your senses and move to Hawaii!

    Hawaii has a warm, beautiful climate and some of the best karma on the planet. Unlike other parts of the USA, the people on the islands are genuinely kind-hearted and friendly to each other. - As long as you pack a sense of common decency along with your swimming trunks you will be treated as Ohana.

    The cost-of-living is not as extreme as popular legend would demand - there are many people who comfortably survive here making less than $30K a year. Think of what your high-caliber IT wage can do here. Think of how much more value your expensive IT employees will find in their paycheck. And yes, there is bandwidth and lots of it.

    A rich social ecology of Native, Asian, Pacific and European culture exists here. Not only is the food great (the best sushi in the US), but the level of cultural diversity is intoxicating to the average Western mind. There's nothing like walking through the park in the morning and passing by a group of Chinese seniors moving through their Tai-Chi exercises, and strolling back through it in the evening to the sounds of a practicing Samoan choir.

    There is a small, but growing, technical community in the islands - which has it's plusses: The technical community that does exist is small, active and very supportive of each other. Most Importantly, people don't yawn when you tell them that you program for a living. :)

    the moment, The Hawaiian economy is economically addicted to the Military and Tourism. Without solid alternative industries, the islands will become stagnant with the transient natures of it's current economic benefactors. - The politicians of Hawaii are slowly coming to their senses about this, and are starting to listen to reason instead of to their campaign contributions.

    Because of this, there has never been a better time to move your venture to Hawaii. The govmn't of the islands are actively seeking Tech Companies to move to the Islands, and provide great financial incentives to businesses wishing to migrate and to the entrepeneurs willing to build here. There has never been a better time to move your venture to "paradise."

    -- Apologies to the Hawaiian Sovereignty People who may be reading this...

  160. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by ari{Dal} · · Score: 2, Informative
    Disadvantages

    lack of world class cities and attractions

    I don't know what Canadian cities you've been visiting...but they're obviously different from where I've been! Have you ever been to Montreal? It's like a bit of Paris (the good bits.. not the seedy nasty non-showering bits) dropped down into the heart of the country. I'd take a walk down St. Denis or Sherbrooke over New York's Fifth avenue any day. Not to mention the world-class dining, shopping, and the fabulous nightlife..the party doesn't even get STARTED here til 1 AM.


    And did I forget to mention the cheap cost of living (I rent a 4 1/2 - that's a two bedroom for the non-Quebecois - for $450 a month in a prime location), amazing public transportation system, and the caché of coming from one of the most recognized places in the world.


    I won't even get into Vancouver, Ottawa, Toronto, St. John's (Party town!), and all the other great spots in this country.


    Other than that, I must say I agree whole-heartedly! Canada rocks as a place to live.. though the taxes do suck (almost half my bonus went to taxes this year...whimper). But I think the public health care system and low costs of just about everything else more than make up for all that.. yes the salaries are lower, but then again, where in NYC or San Fran are you going to find a decent apartment for under $500 CDN?

    --
    Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
  161. Mexico - movie production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't many movies recently been shot in Mexico because of the tremendously lower production costs....?

    When are we going to see this on Indian reservations? completely gets rid of all local/state government regulations/taxes

  162. Come to Canada ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please leave your guns at the border.

  163. If Canada is so cheap... by dark_panda · · Score: 2

    ... maybe slashdot should move here. No more subscriptions!

    Of course I'm kidding. Silly Americans wouldn't be able to handle the beer and the cold.

    J

  164. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had a dollar for every person who thinks his/her little microbrew is "the best in the world", I'd be Bill Gates.

  165. Calgary? by dghcasp · · Score: 2
    Funny the article mentions Calgary, Alberta as the lowest cost place to do business... I moved from there a year-or-so ago to Silicon Valley when I realized that I was sick of working for Nortel and that there weren't any other high-tech companies in Calgary to change to...

    Plenty of Oil & Gas work, though - Programmers even get their own office at most of them... Of course this is offset by the fact your whole life is spent trying to figure out new ways to interprit seismic data... booo-ring...

  166. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    "lack of world class cities and attractions"

    And you call yourself a Canuck? Try Victoria BC (beautiful), Banff, Baffin Island (for the adventurous types), Montreal, Quebec City, etc.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  167. The anti-SSSCA guys are onto something, but... by russotto · · Score: 1

    Remember that a lot of TV production is done in Canada nowadays. That means a strong Hollywood presence. The US and Canadian governments also have an uncomfortably close relationship. If pressed, Canada probably would initially resist an SSSCA-like regime just to be contrary to the US -- but they'd eventually give in. I think to get free of the SSSCA and related laws, moving to countries outside those most Americans would consider living in will be necessary. But Canada could be a stop along the way.

  168. Re:blame canada? by legojenn · · Score: 1

    Here goes my karma, not that I have much, but alas, this is off topic.

    For the extra 40 cents, I would take a cup of Starbucks coffee over Tim Horton's, though I would rather go to a small Italian espresso bar than any chain. As far as economic nationalism goes, ummm, Tim Horton's os owned by Wendy's. Anyhow, I don't understand the popularity of Tim Horton's coffee. I just chalked the lineups at Tim Horton's in Ottawa to the fact that we have a large population of government drones who have no taste.

    --
    I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  169. Re:In the words of the immortal Geddy Lee of Rush. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I'm breaking out the Molson and the back bacon so I can watch the Leafs on TV.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  170. Metric system by cpeterso · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that Canada uses the metric system.. though I'm not sure if that is an advantage or disadvantage..

  171. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree with that. Most people who think Canada is "bland" haven't actually travelled through it. They simply watch too much American TV, which stereotypes us that way.

  172. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by feelafel · · Score: 1

    I'll reply to this one instead of all of them ... I didn't say "absence" nor did I say "none". I just said that we're lacking in world class cities.

    For everyone's reference: I consider Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary and grudgingly "Toronto" to be "world class" cities, in the sense that there's reason for other people in the world to know about them and visit them. If you define a world class city as one which is a cultural centre and on stage with cities like New York and Paris, I'd say only Montreal rates.

    There are loads of places in Canada that are worth visiting: Ottawa, Victoria, Banff, Drumheller, Charlottetown, Cape Breton, Tufino, Yellowknife ... however, they don't rate as "world class". I'm not being unpatriotic, just honest and blunt.

  173. Not a real country? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Lets see...

    Has a (democratic) government
    Stable
    Recognized by every other nation on earth
    Large + industrialized economy
    One of the largest nations physically
    Has flag, embassies, etc
    Member of NATO

    I'd say it is a real country, get over it.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Not a real country? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Actually, Brazil hates our guts...

      The fighting for airplane construction contracts got nasty it seems.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Not a real country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Brazil hates our guts...

      The fighting for airplane construction contracts got nasty it seems.

      Just goes to show that the government screws us all when it gives handouts to Quebec and Quebec-based businesses, eh?

    3. Re:Not a real country? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You mean that quebec-based enterprise who's manufacturing plants are in ONTARIO?

      Yeaaaahh...riiight....

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  174. Seattle's roads suck by cpeterso · · Score: 1

    I don't know what you are talking about Seattle having a better road system..

  175. No No No! by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

    It's not "eh". It's "hey" without the h pronounced. I once thought it your way, but learned the real derivation of the word after many hours of sailing with Canadians.

  176. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Pope · · Score: 1

    According to Ed the Sock, all you need to do is go to Cornerbrook, NF!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  177. Boeing too by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

    Boeing did that recently too. They left Seattle for Chicago because Washington wouldn't bow to their demands and give them all kinds of wacky tax breaks.

  178. Buffalo-Niagara is the place to be! by Quixote · · Score: 2

    You get the best of both worlds in the Buffalo Region.
    You are within short driving distance of fine Canadian establishments (Canadian Ballet, anyone? ;-).
    Good skiing country nearby.
    BioInformatics center just established.

    1. Re:Buffalo-Niagara is the place to be! by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Too bad Buffalo is ugly, depressed, and uncultured. At least the bars are open until 4:00am so you can drown your feelings of utter dispair about living there.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  179. Re:blame canada? by ShaneTheGeologist · · Score: 1
    "get an apartment or house within two or three minutes walk of a Tim Horton's."

    I live in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Everyone is within two or three minutes walk of a Tim Horton's! Mmmmm, Medium-single-single.



    --Shane
  180. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or learn french ;-)

  181. Very perceptive by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

    You were able to root out the underlying international conspiracy without being sidetracked by the economics or the fact that there aren't enough IT workers in the states to fill all of the job postings.

    You are wearing an aluminium foil hat, aren't you?

    1. Re:Very perceptive by Alban+Caradoc · · Score: 1
      You were able to root out the underlying international conspiracy without being sidetracked by the economics or the fact that there aren't enough IT workers in the states to fill all of the job postings.

      You can't possibly be suggesting that there's a high-tech labor shortage in this recession, can you?

      Hiring of Foreign Workers Frustrates Native Job-Seekers

    2. Re:Very perceptive by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

      We can't get fully staffed with qualified people.

    3. Re:Very perceptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is demonstrably false.

      There is a shortage of highly skilled IT workers willing to work for $30K a year.

      So in that sense, there is a shortage, but I've found there's also a shortage of Ferrari's for $5,000 too.

      Funny how that works.

    4. Re:Very perceptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We can't get fully staffed with qualified people"

      A lot of companies are finding it hard to staff up with "qualified people". But let me do some mind reading:

      Qualifications required:
      1) Java experience 5 years
      2) Oracle/Informix experience 5 years
      3) BS degree, MS preferred
      4) $42,000-45,000 depending on experience.

      Funny how there's always a shortage of highly skilled IT workers for entry level wages. Amazing that more people aren't willing to work for 1/2 of the market value.

      Why should companies have to pay more than that? If we let Indians in they'll work for only $30K per year.

      So your brain figures out there's shortage of IT people. If you sit back, you might draw a completely different conclusion about fair market value, but hell, its easier to not blame yourself.

      Tell you what. Increase your salary offers by $15-20K/year and then get back to me on the shortage.

    5. Re:Very perceptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We can't get fully staffed with qualified people.

      My only and best response: You lying, unAmerican, sick-fuck H1-B apologist!!!

  182. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by betis70 · · Score: 1

    Hmm ok, been a while since I lived in Seattle. I like Vancouver compared to San Francisco, which I think most would agree is a 'world-class' city. But then again I haven't LIVED in Vancouver and we all know visiting someplace and living there are two different things.

    --
    I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
  183. But wait...there's more! by Apostata · · Score: 1

    The first 500 San Franciscans (sounds like a monastary, doesn't it?) that move to Canada will recieve no less than 3 Vancouver Grizzlies shirts!

    Not enough?

    Sweat too much? Hot and itchy? Move to Newfoundland (the beautiful location of The Shipping News) and say good-bye to that "dry heat" forever!

    Immigrants from SF will be greeted at the airport by Rush (or Gordon Lightfoot).

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  184. Re:blame canada? by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2

    Trust me, my fellow techies, if you ever move up here, get an apartment or house within two or three minutes walk of a Tim Horton's. You will not regret it.

    Are you saying there's apartments and houses in Canada that are more than two or three minutes walk from a Tim Horton's?

    --

    From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  185. The only thing I'll miss..... by unovox · · Score: 1

    ...when I leave the bay area is the Kuumbwa jazz center and Yoshis. Good live music is hard to find in small towns, though Santa Cruz (Kuumbwa) is an exception. I won't even get into the housing prices here.
    Canada consistently wins the best lifestyle award in some annual poll ( help me out here ). I like Vancuover. Not the cheapest city in Canada but I need to be in the West and near the coast ( else I freak out ). I could go there. Anyone?

    --

    "everyone's different....I am the same"
  186. And the most modest! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What a combo.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  187. Re:In the words of the immortal Geddy Lee of Rush. by da_Den_man · · Score: 1

    "Ten bucks is ten bucks, eh?"

    --
    You keep going until you die..."Me".
  188. Re:In the words of the immortal Geddy Lee of Rush. by Cirrocco · · Score: 1
    Wow! You memorized the whole song? You must be a real professional! Here, have some Hosehead beer!

    Ah, how I do love our Hoser neighbors in the north. They gave us Moranis, Thomas, SCTV, Shatner. What do we give them? Acid rain. They're such good sports about it, though...

  189. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Garin · · Score: 1

    Living in Vancouver is wonderful. (As I type, I'm looking over Granville Island into the downtown core). We have an incredibly beautiful skyline. There are always tons of fun things to do (except after 11pm, when the Mayor says we all have to go to bed). The cultural diversity can cause difficulties, but mostly it means lots of good food, good shopping, and interesting people.

    I've lived in the US, all over Canada, and throughout the Pacific Rim (all English-speaking countries though). Vancouver is easily my favourite city of them all.

    I'll never get tired of having the mountains and the ocean so nearby. The hiking, skiing, cycling, and general outdoors activities are unmatched (and practically year-round).

    The downsides? Driving and parking -sucks-. The transit system is cumbersome at best. Everything's pretty expensive. Too many people are far too politically-correct. Overall, though, it's a great place to be.

    --
    In any field, find the strangest thing and then explore it. -John Archibald Wheeler
  190. Re:blame canada? by dadragon · · Score: 1

    I'm a ten minute walk from the nearest Timmy's.. There is one in the main hallway of my college.

    I don't like their doughnuts, Robin's is much better for that. Tim's coffee is better though, I haven't seen one in Calgary... directions anyone?.

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  191. True around here by FakePlasticDubya · · Score: 1

    I've seen this happen around Chicago, many tech companies, plus other firms are moving out to the suburbs and out of downtown. Sears, for example, has moved most (if not all) of its offices out of the Sears Tower to a facility out in the 'burbs.

    There is what I call the 'tech corridor' along an expressway out in a suburb called Naperville with many large office campuses lining both sides, Motorola, Ameritech, AT&T, and many others are all out there, the growth in recent years has been huge.

    --

    "We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it" -- Winston Churchill
  192. No Problem With Quebec by urmensch · · Score: 1

    the couple times I've been there everyone was very polite to me. i speak some french and I never heard anyone try to put me down thinking i wouldn't know. personally i loved montreal.

  193. Sounds good to me! by Vortran · · Score: 2

    I'd much rather say, "eh?" than say: "EARTHQUAKE!!" Ever since I graduated from college, I've lamented that so many of the bleeding edge technology jobs are on the west coast and I am (happily) stuck in the midwest, ultra-conservative as it is.

    The fact that all of San Francisco and the Bay Area WILL be destroyed by earth quakes is a REAL reason that I haven't moved there.

    If you think the destruction of the WTC hurt US economy, wait until Silicon Valley plunges into the Pacific Ocean. Maybe people over there are finally saying to themselves, "Gee.. we're on a fault here. Everything is super expensive - epsecially housing. This sucks. See ya!"

    I know some folks who had a house in San Jose. They sold it for over $800,000. They moved to South Carolina, bought a house just a tad smaller for under $100,000 and are enjoying retirement with the remainder.

    "Surf's up, dude!"

    ...eh?

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
    1. Re:Sounds good to me! by unovox · · Score: 1

      The big one is coming. But for perspective, heat waves in the midwest have killed more people in the last fifty years than all of our earthquakes combined. So have tornadoes. No one has ever been shaken to death by a quake. The economy however could be shaken to near death.
      A large quake in the East would also have a collossal economic impact.
      I hope I'm in Canada, a guaranteed earthquake-free zone;-)

      --

      "everyone's different....I am the same"
    2. Re:Sounds good to me! by taradfong · · Score: 1

      We can take one whallop of an earthquake here and survive just fine with some time to recover. You get earthquakes in the midwest too, except we're prepared for it - no brick buildings here, and strict construction codes. We have no tornadoes, hurricanes and we see lightning once a year.

      Housing costs a lot here simply because more people want to live here than can afford to and because the average person makes more money here.

      I lived in Chicago for 20+ years and would never go back. Compared to the bay area...

      -the average brain power and sophistication of the person you meet is very high in the bay area. I'm not interested in hanging around 'Sports Bar Morons'. When you go to see Lord of the Rings, the audience has >allamazinghave to. Oh, the endless rows of orange barrels... And BTW, no toll roads in CA.

      -better produce, beter fish, better food in general. Cheap sushi. Beef almost as good. I do miss Portillos and real pizza though.

      -You're driving distance from the ocean, beaches, yosemite, tahoe, etc. I was at a 'business leader's breakfast' in Chicago and they lamented why with U of I, Northwestern, U of C, etc. why the talent base keeps crumbling. It's because young people want to do things, not hibernate inside.

      -Lower crime.

      -Things look cleaner. In general, people take care of the exterior of buildings and landscaping because you see it year round.

      -Air is cleaner or at least a wash. That humidity plus smog in Chicago is a killer. Yeah, SJ's got smog too.

      -The tech world centers around here and it always will. Do you think the high cost of living in Manhattan means the financial center will move to Cleveland? Maybe it's mystique, maybe it's geography, and maybe it's demographics. But I don't care why, except that there's no place like the bay area for high tech opportunity.

      -Not to mention the weather! Who cares if I can get a mansion for cheap somewhere where I hate going outside?

      Don't get me wrong, the bay area isn't for everyone. If you count on every paycheck to cover your bills, you'll go bankrupt or hate your flea circus apartment. If you have kids and have to send them to San Jose schools, you'll pull your hair out in most cases wondering why half the kids are being encouraged to remain in spanish speaking classes, and why your intelligent kid twiddles his thumb or is expected to spend his time helping the other kids get equalized rather than excelling. IMHO the liberal political views and huge government subsidization of immigrants in exchange for votes continues to erode California - hence after the biggest bumper tax year we've ever had we're now facing financical crises the year after (!!).

      (I'm not sure after that whether I made CA more or less attractive!)

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
    3. Re:Sounds good to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, nope. The west coast of Canada is waiting for the big one too.

  194. Florida. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Florida. Beautiful beaches, half the state is nature preserves*, Kennedy Space Center, Cape Canaveral Air Station, Orlando (Kissimmee/Disney/Universal/Sea World/tourist/crap), Tampa (Historic turn-of-the-last-century pirate town), Miami (like Havana, only 1 degree colder and with worse traffic), Talahassee (all the politicians isolated in the coldest, nastiest part of the state, and the only area in the state with volcanic activity in the 20th century), Jacksonville (tech capital, shipping hub for sea/air/land transport, but far too cold for most natives)...


    Sales tax 6%..7% by county. No income tax. Low property taxes. High tourist taxes, so make sure to get a "one year + one day" lease or you'll get screwed.


    Crappy public schools. 51st in the nation in English. Yes, that's behind Puerto Rico... but so was Arkansas.


    Low cost-of-living. 99-cent gas (ok, it's 87 octane, but it's still under a buck). 89-cent milk. Broadband (DSL, cable modem, ... medium-band?) in all major cities and most rural areas > 30,000 people. Apartment in Jacksonville, 1000 square foot, 2-bedroom, 1-bath: bad neighbourhood: $450/month, utilities included; good neighbourhood: $550/month, water included; best neighbourhood (1200 sqft loft): $1000/month + utilities. prices from today's Jacksonville newspaper


    Fifth-highest population in the US. Highest percentage of retired populace in the US. Second-highest concentration of retired populace in the world, but nobody knows who beat us.


    Time required to get a concealed weapons permit: 6 hours. Time required to get a driver's licence: 8 hours. Time required to set foot in Florida soil before becoming governor: 132 hours.


    Vermont "marriages" accepted by most major banks and a few churches.


    Average number of applicants for "tech" jobs: 125. Average number of applicants for "new tech" jobs (Linux, Unix, Internet): 175. Average number of applicants for "heavy metal" (MVS, CICS, COBOL) jobs: 75.



    * - being slowly demolished by toxic runoff from sugar plantations

  195. Re:No No No ... moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who told you that .... mWhahahaha. Sailing with Canadians, oh gee this is priceless.

    Well as a born and bred one I cam assure you eh' is just eh' and has no relation to hey which we pronounce hay ... eh'.

    CC

  196. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    Of course, I'm also a guiness drinker.

    Just to nitpick, drink more before you call yourself a guinness drinker so you can spell it right.

    Another great expression:
    Ni neart go Guinness!
    (Guinness for Strength!)

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  197. Re:Ok?? Move to BANGALORE!!!! by yintercept · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, the mark up on tech goods, internet, etc can no longer justify even an $8.00 an hour Oklahoma worker. Perhaps it is finally time for the tech industry to complete the move over seas.

  198. Go one better - NZ by jameslore · · Score: 1

    Come to NZ instead where US$8 is about average salary ;-)

  199. 7-11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there ANY 7-11's in North Dakota? Last time I was in Grand Forks and Fargo, I couldn't find even one!

  200. United States of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I thought companies weren't just leaving San Fran, they were leaving the market entirely. Did 200k tech people get laid off last year?

    But if they are moving to Canada, there are a few good reasons. Canada doesn't have a DMCA (yet), or a nazi emperor (yet), and Canada doesn't throw people in jail for doing harmless things that the people already voted for as ok. But aside from that, all the media is from the USA, and so are the laws and foreign policy, so it'll be just like at home.

  201. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Bet my office view beats yours! :-)

    Vancouver is a relatively dull place. Remember New Year's Y2K? No huge parties. No major *celebration*.

    Having lived in a REAL world class city (Tokyo), Vancouver comes across as podunk small town.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  202. Re:Bioware by Wintermancer · · Score: 2

    Funny.

    Sure they grew up here. But they didn't have to stay here, especially once they hit it big. Maybe it's something else....nah.

    Please, please don't move here. It's very cold, the residents are more surly than hung-over Texan and the women are large-boned and ugly.

  203. Re:blame canada? by unovox · · Score: 1

    Who cares about their doughnuts...how's the beer?

    --

    "everyone's different....I am the same"
  204. Re:Mod me down...Donuts by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Tim Horton's is moving in. Their stores are always packed.

    Looks like Vancouverites are fed up with the yuppie elitism of Starbucks. Just gimme tha caffeine!

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  205. Re:Bioware by rudedog · · Score: 2

    Actually, I was born in Edmonton, raised in Fort Saskatchewan, Red Deer, and Rimbey, moved back to Edmonton and and lived there for 15 years before moving to Seattle. As for the women, that's where I met my wife, so you should watch your tongue :-)

    The only reason I wouldn't move back to Edmonton is because of the cold. Here in Seattle, the magnolia tree in our courtyard started to bud yesterday :-)

  206. Re:Bioware by Wintermancer · · Score: 2

    Actually, I was born in Edmonton, raised in Fort Saskatchewan, Red Deer, and Rimbey, moved back to Edmonton and and lived there for 15 years before moving to Seattle. As for the women, that's where I met my wife, so you should watch your tongue :-)

    Born here. Raised here. Met wife here. Live and work here.

    Not complaints here! ;-)

  207. MOVE TO NEW ORLEANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    There are 9 tech people in New Orleans. We need more. Please help us.

  208. Diversity and Tolerance are in Montreal by maggard · · Score: 2
    San Francisco and Silicon Valley has an enormous critical mass of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/Trans people, and Nerds. The counter-culture continues to thrive here.
    Consider Montreal.

    Great enormous gay community, widespread acceptance, far more liberal in many ways then any US city, arguably more/better nightlife then SF, equally great food, much cheaper cost of living, safer streets. Beautiful people who really appreciate the better things life has to offer. Walk down Rue St. Denis or St. Lauraunt or du Gai Village on Ste. Catherine on a warm summer night and tell me it can be any better (ok - not as great today with the snow.)

    Yes there's the whole French/English issue but that's primarily political and almost never personal. In 5 years of living here in both a samll Francophone farming community and then on the East side of Montreal (Ahuntsic) I've had it brought up twice, both by drunks.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  209. Canada Sucks! -Well, the weather does, anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --This is not new: many businesses vacated New York State in large numbers during the late 80's, for the same reasons of high taxes and personnel costs. Previous to that time period, it was assumed that businesses wouldn't bother to relocate to another state just to take advantage of lower state taxes.
    --Living on the Illinois side of the St Louis-metro area, I can say that a (small) difference of a couple percent of state taxes translates into a large difference in commercial development. All the jobs on the MO side pay a bit more, and just about everything sold there costs a bit less than in IL.
    --Also note: the Rams relocated to St Louis because Orange County went broke, and couldn't hand the owners piles of money anymore... -but that's another bitch. - Scooter

  210. Re:Move to Oklahoma, and meet MORONS by tbvh · · Score: 1

    But let me guess, you are one of thoise illiterate Linux Monkeys who once read

    Fascinating.

  211. GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3
    Don't underestimate the feeling of abuse you will suffer when you pay the combined GST/PST on most anything you purchase. The above author writes it off, but it really is a bitch. Remember you get this tax on big ticket items as well, and that is where it gets really painful.

    Yes, California is the most expensive state to live in, but moving to Canada is hardly an improvement. You are better off moving to a low-tax/no-tax state.

    1. Re:GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by Tadman · · Score: 1

      If you are an independent contractor, you can credit the GST you paid against the GST you collected on your fees, so you only pay the difference. Not like most taxes where you pay, then pay again.

    2. Re:GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by FFFish · · Score: 2

      You want to get informed about the real costs of taxation.

      Start with something from the CATO Institute. You can find detailed and accurate accounts of the "hidden" taxation you're subjected to. In particular, the amount the government garnishes off your wages by forcing the employer to cough up money for employing you.

      Then check out this Sales Tax Rate table. There are only five states that don't charge a sales tax. All others do: it may be a hidden tax. And I'm not entirely sure that the five oddballs aren't using some sort of skullduggery to tax the wholesale sale of merchandise; if so, that tax just gets passed on down to you, the consumer.

      In Canada, at least, those taxes are up front and in the open, so that we know what the amount is and whether it gets changed. If the tax were hidden, it could go up and we'd never be told.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No skullduggery in New Hampshire.

      We have no sales tax here on goods, although there is an 8% tax on Meals and Rentals (food joints, hotels/motels/vacation rentals, and car rentals).

      There is no general income tax, but there is a 6% tax on dividends and interest income (with a large exemption). There is a Business Profits Tax.

      Property taxes are admittedly high, but most of that money is collected and used at the local level, so there is some element of taxpayer control.

      The state owns the liquor stores, but charges a very reasonable price so as to attract customers from neighboring states.

      And we end sentences with "Ayuh"... if we feel like it, assuming we deign to answer you at all...

      (And, yes, we have moose, snow, tourists, black flies, NASCAR and other race car fans, and other assorted oddities that take getting used to. The Border Patrol is fairly busy trying to keep the Mounties from getting too pissed off at the liquor smugglers who sneak stuff up over our northern border...)

    4. Re:GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Canada, at least, those taxes are up front and in the open...

      In fact, that was the whole point of GST. BEfore it there was a manufaturing tax, and it was hidden from the consumer.

      The GST+PST combo does hurt on expensive items, just when you have somehting down to $5000, along comes $350 in taxes! OTOH, in Alberta there is no PST, so you just end up with 7% overhead.

  212. Re:Move to Oklahoma, and meet MORONS by jayed_99 · · Score: 1

    I acutally liked any compiled componant better.

  213. Re:Bioware by csbruce · · Score: 1

    raised in Fort Saskatchewan, Red Deer...

    So what's the deal with all of those winter olympians from Red Deer, anyway?

  214. Don't confuse UN standard with wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UN standard is frankly a relic, and is largely derivative of an anti-US bias. Look at the scoring for the UN index and you will see it places society above the individual - its no mistake that socialistic nations come out ahead.

  215. same old story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard the same thing in the 80s -- companies leaving CA to do business elsewhere. The fact of the matter is that the high tech center is still Silicon Valley and I don't see that changing any time soon. Moving low wage jobs out of state is not all that interesting, quite frankly. The high paying, bleeding edge tech jobs are here. So for those moving out --- don't let the door hit you on the way out!

  216. Big, medium, small cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently live outside of Phoenix, and I get into the city about twice a year. Everything that I need is very close to where I live. There are bars, theaters, and stores right around me. I'm sure building a company 25 miles away from the downtown of a city will cost a lot less and there will be fewer problems. And, if there is some sporting event, it will take about 30 minutes to get to it.

  217. Re:Bioware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a guess, red deer meat?

  218. ... and the response from The South... by wumingzi · · Score: 2
    i like the "even Canada" statement. said as if it were completely outrageous. "even timbucktwo..."

    Going abroad is a big deal for a company, even if "abroad" just means to Canada. It's like Vincent Vega said in Pulp Fiction. "Everything's just a little different over there". New legal system, new patent regime, different accounting standards, blah blah blah.

    From a worker's point of view, it's hard to say. I live in Seattle. I go to Vancouver pretty frequently. I think it is one of the world's great cities. Unfortunately, there's a pretty big disjoint between the cost of living and the salaries. Take housing. Vancouver property is similar in real dollar costs to Seattle, while salaries are merely similar in that a tech professional who makes US$n per year will probably also be paid C$n in Vancouver. At the same time, you will be taxed rather heavily.

    A techie can make a good living in either place, but even with the quality of services in Canada (health care, education, etc.) it's hard to make the numbers add up.

    and i see the "baren glacier as soon as you hit the border" misconception is still alive and well. Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and others are massive metropolatin centers with similar climate to many US cities. in Vancouver it rarely freezes and typically has winter temperatures in the mid-high 40's. (that's around 8degC... eh?)

    There isn't a huge glacier at the 49th parallel? How d'y'all keep yer igloos cold all year then?

    Calgary has a climate similar to Chicago I suppose. I never understood folks who lived there either. The salary:cost-of-living ratio is better in Calgary, but the problem is... you're in Calgary.

    j.

    1. Re:... and the response from The South... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Why would Calgary have a climate anything like Chicago? They're separated by a couple thousand miles or so. One's on a gigantic lake; the other is tucked up against the mountain foothills. Chicago gets purely evil winters. Calgary gets chinooks--basically, one-day summers in the middle of winter. Calgary doesn't have the humidity of Chicago, so it never feels as unbearably hot nor unbearably cold as Chicago.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  219. Tim's is about the coffee by Inexile2002 · · Score: 1

    Techies who go to Tim's are there for the best damn coffee they have ever tried. I agree that KK donuts are better tasting, but if you pack more grease than a big mac and more sugar than cotton candy into ANYTHING, then deep fry it, its going to taste pretty damn good. Oh, and being up here in Canuck land, where are all these damn tech jobs?

    1. Re:Tim's is about the coffee by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      please. compare tim horton's coffee with a americano from any shop with a good espresso maker and staff who care even a little.. there is no contest.

  220. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have you left yet? I would love it if more ungrateful people like you packed their bags and left. You're free to take the next flight out of here so chao!

  221. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by jfortier · · Score: 1

    Actually, unlike the the U.S. Social Security system, the Canadian Pension Plan enjoys statutory protections from raiding by the government. It is not possible for politicians to divert the funds to other purposes, so any money that goes in will end up getting paid out as benefits. Add to that the recent CPP rate increases, and you can be pretty sure that the CPP will be around for a while (the Globe and Mail had an article on this a while ago, but their website only has 7 days of freely searchable archives).

  222. Re:blame canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 15 Robin's and 32 Tim's in Calgary.

    http://yp1.superpages.ca/listings.phtml?CID=0015 55 001B7&AL=&T=calgary&N=robins&PG=L&STYPE=S&R=N&SRC= alberta&S=AB&NA=&PM=00040000&LC=15&PI=1&MC=1&CB=&P P=

    and

    http://yp1.superpages.ca/listings.phtml?CID=0015 55 001B7&AL=&T=calgary&N=hortons&PG=L&STYPE=S&R=N&SRC =alberta&S=AB&NA=&PM=00100000&LC=32&PI=1&MC=1&CB=& PP=

  223. Las Vegas, Reno and Phoenix by eldub1999 · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine pointed out some interesting facts about these three cities.

    First, no natural disasters. Not susceptible to earthquakes, tornados, flooding, or fires (nothing to burn). Makes an ideal location for data centers and call centers.

    Second, power. Hoover Dam. Need I to say more?

    Third, within three hours (by air) of most any location in the US. Not to mention, cheap airfare and in the case of Las Vegas and Reno, cheap hotels.

    Forth, Nevada corporations...

    Fifth, low housing costs.

    On the negative side there is the unbearable heat, the large amount of old people, and, well, the unbearable heat.

    I suppose the ideal situation would be to have the corporate HQ and data center in one of these three cities and the developers all up in Ottawa. Best of both worlds!

  224. You forgot the obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot"

    "Hey hon. Get me a natty bo"

    "No way, we're goin' to bow-haygurs!"

  225. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Die CPP DIE! I fucking hate contributing $1600 and up a year to the old folks who never did pay in their share. I'm going to leave this country sooner or later because of the taxes...

    And the whole 'raiding social security' thing is a bunch of nonsensical rhetoric, too.

  226. Re:Are these things really that hard to figure out by taradfong · · Score: 1

    Bravo to you! For the longest time during the .com heyday my gut instinct kept telling me this, but the hype possessed me too and shooed it away. It is my dream to succeed just like you did, not as a slave to the VCs and the stock market.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  227. Re:Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wi by andymac · · Score: 1

    Which is why many Canadian cities are doing OK in attracting hi-tech co's: that's where the geeks are. Canada is built on multi-culturalism and tolerance. Vancouver (where I live) has a huge gay&lesbian community, amazing arts and sub-culture (just have to look for it), and has very high education standards which are accessible to much of the population (plus a BSc/BASc will only put you back $25K CAD for the whole thing, not some retarded amount like $25K USD a year). Add AMAZING quality of life, outdoor activities, scenery, oh yeah and WHISTLER. 'Nuff Said. ;-)

    Sure I hate paying as much tax as I do. But I do it for social welfare reasons: if I'm well off, I should support those who are less fortunate (like the fellow who loses teh ability to work due to MS); if I fund the education system, so more people can get degrees and high(er) paying jobs, they too will pay more taxes, which will help with my retirement. It's like karma, baby: what goes around comes around.

    Besides the gap between what Americans and 'Nucks pay in taxes is not as big as most Americans (and Canadians) think it is...

    Sorry for the rant.

    --
    "Content's a bitch."
  228. Why the coast? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

    Why the coast? A colleague just sent me a miserere complaining about the snow and cold in St. Louis. Here on the coast, it's sunny and clear.

    Why the coast? The air is so clean I can see three mountain ranges from my office and one of them is across some 50 miles of ocean.

    Why the coast? If I walk down the street with a woman who isn't the same race as I am, I don't get a second look.

    Why the coast? I was standing in a grocery store checkout line and overheard 7 different languages. With those speakers come different perspectives and that makes for some really interesting dinner conversations.

    Why the coast? Did I mention the physical beauty of the place? This country is unbelievably gorgeous and varied. We've got ocean and mountains right next to each other.

    Why the coast? John Steinbeck called this country Eden and he wasn't too far off the mark.

    That's why the coast.

    1. Re:Why the coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not the coast? Sooner or later the big one will hit and we'll all slide off into the Pacific.

    2. Re:Why the coast? by C.+Mattix · · Score: 2

      Why not the coast? Rolling blackouts.

      Why not the coast? Cost of 1000ft^2 apt about 1K more then in Indiana.

      Why not the coast? Unless you are from the area, large distance from family.

      Why not the coast? Cost of living.

      Why not the coast? 1.5 hour commutes.

      Why not the coast? Earthquakes.

      I live in Indiana. I like Indiana. I like seasons.

      Oh. .and the 7 different language thing happens here too.

  229. Yeah, that's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start learning how to say "eh" immediately if you plan on moving to Canada. Otherwise we might have to look harder for a reason to kick your ignorant asses.

  230. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

    Fair enough, I always seem to typo that.

    The truly ironic thing? I work in the Guinness Tower in Vancouver, BC. I shit you not.

  231. Tech Companies are Leaving - This Time for Real by zericm · · Score: 1

    Every few years, there are news stories in the Bay Area talking about the great new outpost for technology: Ireland, Boise, Reston, Columbus (OH), New York, Albaquerque, and now Canada. Everytime, a few companies move some business units out of the area, or maybe the whole company. And then the moving stops.

    What people forget, and then soon relearn, is that the Bay Area is a very damn fine place to place your technology company, and a damn fine place to work in technology. This is an area with: a well educated populace; some of the best technology education in the world; dense population centers; a young workforce; great technology infrastructer; a critical mass of technology companies.

    Sure, manufacturing, call centers, data centers, and developers, and even some companies are going to locate elsewhere. But the Bay Area a technology ghost town? I'll believe it when I see it.

    --
    The welfare of the people has always been the alibi of tyrants. - Albert Camus
  232. Re:Amazing. - Are you shitting me??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chicago's not that horrible. But if you want to live in a great midwestern city, Milwaukee is a whole lot of fun. Big enough to feel like a real city, but still lots of green open space. Cheap housing, etc. Not easy to find high tech jobs though. Too bad no one locates there. Mpls/StPaul is darn nice too. Unless your candy-ass can't take a little cold weather. Wimps. Better yet, get a telcommuting gig and live in some quiet rural community...

  233. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    That is absolutely hilarious man. Any job openings for a UNIX coder (C preferably, but PHP/Perl will do) -- I would give my last pint to be able to have that on my business card. At least until I went to buy more.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  234. of course not, he's canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It HaD tO bR SaYd.

  235. They are already moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for American Express. I recently got laid off, but before I did get laid off, they outsourced almost all our IT to TATA in India. It's all gone. They sent indians here, we trained them, then they sent the indians back to india, then laid us all off. Now they have outsourced the management to IBM. This process took about 3 years, but they did it. Ain't it great?

    1. Re:They are already moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three years? Hmmmm, mabbe they been doing this for years. And we're just figuring it out now? Companies have been moving overseas for over 20 years now. This is nothing new, it's only new to us in IT. And we don't like it, do we. Will the last IT worker to leave the US please turn off the server!!!!

    2. Re:They are already moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of training them, you should have found a new job. Thanks for your support.

  236. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately not... just a room full of EJB coders and me as the token admin.

  237. Louisville is GREAT by smagruder · · Score: 2

    I'm also a software developer born-and-raised and currently living in Louisville, KY. Businesses and people across the USA need to stop thinking of Louisville as a "hick town"--I wildly assure you that IT IS NOT. As a former resident of upstate NY, Charlotte, NC and the SF bay area, I attest that Louisville is a modern city with very upstanding people and lots of things to do for a city its size (and it isn't so small -- 1 million in the metro area!).

    Louisville has vibrant arts, sports, architecture, politics, business, attractions and nightspots and a very fun two-week festival in April/May surrounding the Kentucky Derby (including "Thunder Over Louisville", the nation's largest air power and fireworks show). And if that isn't enough, the University of Louisville includes a very good school of engineering.

    Of course, the most important aspect of Louisville is her people, among the friendliest you'll ever run into.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  238. Kanata by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that nobody has mentionned Kanata, Ontario yet. Kanata is considered by many as being North Silicon Valley. Kanata is a small suburb of Ottawa, Canada's national capital. I've been there, and the massive amount of high-tech companies there is quite impressive. IBM, Texas Instruments, Boeing and Lockheed Martin all have at least satelite offices in Kanata (or sometimes a little outside). Mitel Semiconductor has it's world headquarters there, and so does Nortel and Corel (I was told that Nortel has approximately 40 good-sized facilities in the greater Ottawa area, but I'm not 100% sure on that.)

    Not only is the NCR (National Capital Region) great for tech companies, it's also great for their employees. The city is just beautiful and there is even some great country land just outside town, with Kanata smack in the middle. My aunt works for Mitel Semiconductor and she lives in a log home surrounded by trees with a view of the river.

    And no, this isn't a shameless plug for my hometown. I'm actually a New Brunswicker. However, I will be going to Carleton University next year and I'll be looking for a co-op placement in the years after. The more tech companies go to the NCR, the better. :]

    PS: Canadians DO say "eh" a lot, but we don't use it to end every single sentence! And I don't know who started this whole "aboot" thing, but it's actually pretty rare.

    1. Re:Kanata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ottawa is a profoundly dull, gov't town populated by fat midle-aged shabbily dressed gov't drones leeching off the taxes paid by other regions. If you don't mind 6 month long winters, crap radio stations, and a two hour drive to Montreal for the closest decent nightclubs, you'll adore Blottawa.

    2. Re:Kanata by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

      Bathurst, NB is a profoundly dull industrial town populated by fat middle aged miners and paper mill workers, as well as people leeching off taxes to survive. Our winters are 6 months in a good year, we have 2 radio stations and both have only recently picked up such songs as How You Remind Me by Nickelback, which everyone is sick of, and it's a TWELVE hour drive to Montreal for the closest decent nightclubs. I really don't see Ottawa being that bad.

      With apologies to the people of Bathurst, NB. It must be said we aren't ALL miners, mill workers and "tax leeches". Though I doubt many Bathurstians are /.ers...

    3. Re:Kanata by MSBob · · Score: 2
      With apologies to the people of Bathurst, NB. It must be said we aren't ALL miners, mill workers and "tax leeches". Though I doubt many Bathurstians are /.ers...

      Well how about a Saint Johnner, eh?

      Talk about dull towns in the maritimes... Shit even Fredericton has more entertainment qualities than Saint John. And here you either work for the Irvings or you don't work at all. Sad but true. Can't beat the cost of living though.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  239. San Francisco is just the beginning by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The exodus from SF is the beginning of a larger trend. India graduates nearly 40,000 highly qualified engineers *every year*. China, probably four times that, and climbing. The Law of Lowest Wages, combined with increasing commodification of technology will drive many companies out of the US entirely within the next dozen years. Roughly 46% of our working population works directly or indirectly with technology. Think about what boardroon executives probably already considering as they make plans for future capital and physical investment. Capital is 'on the wire'. Domestic fealty just doesn't cut it for public corporations; not in a world where profit is king. There will still be strong technology innovation coming out of the U.S. for many years to come. However, much of the implementation of that innovation will not necessarily have to be performed by people here in the States. We're facing the very beginning of a huge social displacement problem. Look at the San Francisco phenomenon as a micro-trend that will soon snowball. Our domestic planners (an oxymoron?) had better start preparing for this and look for ways to either keep people fully employed, or actively interested in a slowed-down version of the 'good life', or we're looking for real trouble down the road.

    1. Re:San Francisco is just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "India graduates nearly 40,000 highly qualified engineers *every year*. "

      They are busy killing each other over things like religion etc ...

    2. Re:San Francisco is just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nearly 40,000 highly qualified engineers *every year*. "

      Not to mention that an Indian Master degree in Math is equivalent to someone who has taken junior year math at a western university.

      Don't get me wrong, Indian people are smart, friendly, and hard working, but I think their school system is not comparable to a western education.

  240. The Land Where Nobody Leaves or Comes To by piecewise · · Score: 2

    Come, High Tech companies! Move to the land where nobody leaves from or goes to!

    I'm talking about a city with sports teams that *almost* make it, only to screw it all up!

    I'm talking about a city where race crimes are committed almost simply for ole' time's sake!

    I'm talking about a city whose population hasn't moved in some 2,391 years!

    I'm talking about a city who hasn't added a Congressman since the 20's!

    I'm talking about the best damn city in the world -- one that can fool you with its dirty slums and its beautiful million dollar homes, with its crappy neighborhood electronics stores and its massive skyline.

    I'm talking about Philadelphia. City of Brotherly Love. (Well, the brothers sure do love each other, but the white guys are starting to realize how wimpy and nerdy they are... [and I'm one of them;) ])

    Ahh, Philly. A place with state-controlled failing schools and an idiot mayor, who won by .6% (if you include the Buchanan votes from Florida that they threw in and counted as his...).

    Beautiful, Philly. Where the famous Philly Cheese Steak has produced millions upon millions of added dollars... as well as millions upon millions of added pounds for the police.

    Amazing Philly. Featuring one of the most shameless newspapers in the country -- who, during the Republican National Convention, used a dark, low-contrast picture of Philly's skyline that said with text, "It's been great!" -- instead of a beautiful color shot of all the red white and blue balloons falling around the then-governor.

    My city -- Philly.

    On second thought... stay away, High Tech firms. I LIKE my city just the way it is.

    ...Just thank God I live an hour away in the burbs!

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  241. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by achaudhary · · Score: 1

    Lack of world-class cities? I'm a Calgarian living in New York. Calgary is small, very small, but their transit system, airport, schools, road network, planning, quality of life, nightlife, Stampede, proximity to the Rockies, access to '88 Olympic facilities, etc add up to a lot. It may not be world-scale, but it is certainly a world-class city. It is Canada's No. 2 corporate capital after Toronto (even though Montreal and Vancouver are much larger), has the best winters of any prairie city (which are still bad), gets the most sun of any region in North America (nothern Montana and southern Alberta share this distinction), and has a diverse population. Which, unlike in US cities, is not racially segregated by neighborhood. The University of Calgary has made quite a few important research breakthroughs in the last few years, and is very affordable, along with SAIT, and Mount Royal College.

  242. Re:Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wi by achaudhary · · Score: 1

    It is a little known fact that Canada is the most diverse of all Western developed nations, and will be the first among them to become a country with less than 50% of its population being white.
    Not only are race relations in general a lot better (note that most Canadian cities don't have the US's trademark ethnic neighborhoods, even though they're often just as diverse), but the attitute of the population and the government towards homosexuals and other often sidelined groups is more than tolerant. It is acceptance. Even the most right-wing provinces (Alberta) generally have more liberal policies and attitudes than the US.

  243. aboot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a lumberjack or a fur trader.
    I don't live in an igloo or eat blubber or own a dog sled.
    And I don't know Jimmy, Sally or Suzy from Canada, although I'm certain they're really, really nice.
    I have a prime minister, not a president.
    I speak English and French, not American.
    And I pronounce it about, not aboot.
    I can proudly sew my country's flag on my backpack.
    I believe in peacekeeping, not policing. Diversity, not assimilation.
    And that the beaver is a truly proud and noble animal.
    A toque is a hat, a chesterfield is a couch.
    And it is pronounced zed, not zee, zed.
    Canada is the second largest landmass, the first nation of hockey and the best part of North America.
    My name is Joe, and I am Canadian!"

  244. Re:blame canada? by achaudhary · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah, good tip. I live in the New York area, and I've tried them all: Dunkin' Donuts, Krispy Kreme, Twin Donut, local stores, even the supposedly famous NY bagel shoppes. Tim Horton's and the Great Canadian Bagel ROCK. I always bring bagels with me everytime I travel back home to Calgary.

  245. I live in Tulsa by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

    It's cursed. Once you move here, you can't escape. Much of that comes from the low cost of living. Can you rent a decent 850 sqft apartment anywhere else for $489/mo? My apartment is right off a major pedestrian area of town, and I'm within safe walking distance of two grocery stores, a Blockbuster, numerous semi-fast foods, my bank, and much more.

    However, THE NIGHT LIFE SUCKS ASS. Tulsa has ORU, one of the largest religious schools anywhere. Expect to get preached to in the main town square. It happens all summer long, and he never shuts up. Everything is closed at 2:00 AM or earlier. I can count the number of clubs on my hands, and most of them suck. It's all a bunch of frat boys throwing beer around.

    The 2600 group here is pretty cool. I hang with them occasionally. If your into wardriving, this is the place. This is also an M$ town. Everything is run on M$.

    The main thing is that the town is ultra status-quo. It wants to maintain a 1950's outlook, where everyone goes to church on Sunday and no one stays up late. The city council is completely detached from reality, arguing amongst themselve about road improvements while the one of the largest employeers is getting delisted from the NYSE (WCG). They don't even realize it.

    Don't move here. Flee while you can. It's too late for me, but I try to warn others.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  246. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by mindel · · Score: 1

    Not to quibble (well ok, just a bit), but once a year, Ottawa hosts the largest chambermusic festival in the world. I'd call that world-class. And living in Ottawa gives you tons of high-tech companies to choose from, and the undisputed world-class city of Montreal just a two-hour drive away. For those of you living in San Francisco, that's about what it takes you to commute to work, eh?

  247. But Canada has hidden taxes too, in droves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On everything you buy from gas to booze to tires.

  248. Unless you want to speak English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Or advertise in English. Or conduct some other official affair in English.

    give me a break, the Bloc turned Quebec into a Fascist province.

  249. HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHWWHHWHhwhwhwhehehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahhahahaha hahaahaaamuuuuuwwaahahahahaa
    aahahaaHAAHAHAHAa haAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAhahahawwwwwwhaahahahahahaa
    ahaa ha hhahaaAMAUAAHAAAHwhwhwhwhwwwwwhahaaaaaahahahahahah ahaAAHAHAAHA a
    hehehe
    eh
    woaaahahahahahaha --- "say eh alot" hahahahehhhamuwaahahahaa that's freakin rich HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahehehe he maybe we'll leave our igloos for a while to ski to work and welcome in this arriving godsend of american consumerism

  250. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a country of 29 million in an area larger than that of the US, I think we do pretty good in terms of cultural attractions.

  251. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UHHH!!!!

    Not true.

    Governments have been raiding the CPP fund for years. It is the EI fund that has statutory protection.

    You can blame Quebec for that since they decided to use their fund (QPP is seperate) to prevent any english company from ever buying anything in quebec as well as to buy up companies outside of Quebec (ever wonder where a severly indebted company in quebec got enough money to buy up Sun Publishing, from the pension fund). After Quebec started doing this, the other provinces whined and complained and got the same deal.

    The only difference now is that the provinces have actually started to pay the pension fund back (with no interest mind you).

  252. How about Idaho? by HardCase · · Score: 2
    The largest manufacturer of DRAM in the world (according to de Dios) is located in Boise, Idaho. And guess what? The pay is competitive, from operators to engineers.


    Oh yeah, and nobody here speaks with a drawl or says "eh".


    And spuds are tasty!


    -h-

  253. new reality by surfcow · · Score: 1
    Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot.

    After WWII, the US economy had a serious expansion for about 2 decades. People got to think of it as the norm.

    When the economy tanked hard in the 1970s, they were shocked, they didn't have a word for it. They sure as hell didn't want to call it a depression. That conjured up images of soup-lines, the dust bowl, failing banks, etc. So they called it a recession, but it was a global depression.

    The banks that failed were in South East Asia and South America this time, the soup-lines were in Eastern Eurpoe this time, but it was still a depression. The pain was on foreign faces, so it was easier to miss.

    We just came out of a fairly long sustained economic expansion again. And peole think that is the norm, again. We are now in a recession / depression again. (They are now afraid of the word 'recession', they call it a down-turn, etc.)

    You can't just pop out of school and into a 6 figure job quite as easily as you could in the 90s. Get used to it. People have to make sacrifices, even move to other cities sometimes.

    We, the techies, are used to having the world at our feet, being sought after. That may change for a while.

    =brian

  254. You just marked yourself, buddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your attitude is the whole problem that caused the issues the target article is dealing with.

    I'm so sick of coastal snobbery it's not even funny.

    All 6 of your "reasons" are nothing but naive pretentiousness.

    Climate? Whatever. Like Seattle doesn't have its rain and the Bay its earthquakes. And like it doesn't get cold on the East coast, either. Whatever. In any case, maybe you should try enjoying snow for a change.

    Air quality? What the hell? Since when did the midwest have bad air? Need I mention the smog-LA association that has been burned into our cultural consciousness?

    Racism? Bullshit. Racism is a problem everywhere. I hear twice as many complaints about racial problems from people on the coasts than I do here in the midwest. Racial problems are probably worse on the coasts, if anything. Homelessness certainly is.

    Cultural diversity? Again, you must have last been in the midwest in 1950 or something. The midwest has the largest pockets of many minority groups anywhere in the US.

    Physical beauty? Have you seen Lake Superior, Michigan, or Erie? Have you been to Northern Minnesota, Wisconsin, or Michigan? Have you been through the river valleys in the midwest? Seen the Mississippi? Prairie has a beauty all its own.

    Steinbeck? I'm glad your're smart enough to have read your high school literature. Have you read Hemingway's accounts of Michigan? Or how about the Great Gatsby? Or how about Willa Cather?

    I don't know where this attitude about the coasts comes from, but it's bullshit and it's got to stop.
    There are more people, but they're not smarter, more cultured, or more civilized; the coasts are pretty, but not any more pretty than the midwest; there are big cities, but they're not any more resourceful or sophisticated than those in the central states.

    Maybe you should try visiting the midwest for a change instead of spouting the crap you do.

    Then again, maybe not. The midwest is better off without you.

  255. Dallas sucks. by rhinoX · · Score: 1

    They're all WASP cowboys. At least there is some diversity (some, ahah, try a LOT) of diversity in Houston.

    --
    The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
    1. Re:Dallas sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I stopped off anywhere I saw lots of asians, colored folks, and hispanics. Dallas isn't as white as you think.

    2. Re:Dallas sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's gone to hell like most of California. Pity.

  256. Life in Montreal (was: One Other Problem With...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Montreal is pretty OK overall. There's that referendum thing all the time, but, speaking as a Francophone, it's really getting old, and I think even the party which fosters it doesn't really believe it will be possible anymore.


    And, keep in mind there were only two such votes. The last time was close, but current polls don't make it out so close. The premier at the time said a lot of stupid things after being defeated, and this may have played into this as well.


    As far as your points go:

    1. There's nothing that can be done about this, unfortunately. The current federal government wanted to add funding to a lot of R&D, but this probably won't pan out, given the need for DND budget...
    2. I've talked about this above.
    3. In Montreal, if you need to be served in English, you will be served in English pretty much anywhere on the island. Granted, there are idiots everywhere, but then again, some Ottawa people won't serve Francophones in French even though it's supposed to be a bilingual city. Actually, some places even serve you only in English (which is in theory illegal), and the population doesn't really mind. In some regions, not speaking French could be a problem, but in Montreal, it really isn't.


      However, if you wish to live there permanently, you should probably learn French. In times of economic crunch, bilingual people do better than unilingual. I have an Anglophone friend who would have a job by now, had she spoken French.


      French isn't that hard a language--just a bit weird. And Montrealers don't mind if you're not completely fluent--they are actually very happy if you only try. We actually make more fun of the France accent than of the english accent. Of course, the France people pretend that we have an accent, but we know better.

    4. I've never seen much racial tension in Montreal. People seem to get along fine. Actually, I live in an appartment building where maybe 50% of the residents are of african or arabic descendance, and I've never seen any tension. The Montreal Chinatown is one of the few I've seen in which non-Chinese aren't looked at as if they are intruders. People pretty much get along here--what tension there is seems to be more around linguistic lines than racial, and even that seems to want to fade out.


      One of the reasons we get a lot of ethnic groups is because university study here is so cheap, and we have both McGill and ConU which have an international vocation (U of Montreal is only international if you speak French, I'm afraid). Both universities are downtown, so you can expect a lot of diversity walking down De Maisonneuve.

    5. There's a few more shady areas, but I feel safe, as a resident, and I'm not in what one would call a "safe" area. The public transportation doesn't feel like a place where you may get shot any minute. Just take ordinary precautions (don't leave stuff unattended, etc.), and this is a very safe place for a city of that size.
    6. The main thing about the education system is that there's some weird laws about your children having to go to French school in some conditions. This annoys a lot of immigrants, and I can't blame them. The school system quality is OK, I guess (I haven't seen how it is elswhere, except in Ontario where education in French is about 20 years out of date--apologies to any Franco-Ontarians reading this...). Its main problem is that it tends to get students used not to make a lot of effort to use material from one course into another course. Then you get in university and you're in a bit of a fix. That is not to say there are no good public schools--there are quite a few of those, but you must research that beforehand before choosing where to live.


      The post high-school system is pretty impressive, and university is very cheap at this point in time if you actually settle in the province. Cégep (kind of like senior high school) is pretty good, and usually public Cégep is actually as good as (if not better in some cases) private Cégep.


      University education is pretty good. I personally went to Concordia, and I found their engineering program to be pretty decent--a lot of lab time, pretty well intermingled with theory. McGill's reputation is not to be denied, although us Concordians think it's a bit overrated. :{) Montreal U is pretty good, if you speak French (although Polytechnique students sometimes get stuck with engineering books in English!)



    Well, what can I say? I love my city. :{) I've been to a few other cities in France and the US, and although they're nice places to visit, I find only Montreal is a nice place to live. That's why I'm still there, I guess...


    Actually, you missed the biggest minuses of living here (a non-resident wouldn't know, I suppose):

    1. The public transportation system is pretty good for a North American city, but its coverage kind of sucks outside downtown (especially in the more western parts of the island, but north-east and extreme east sucks pretty bad as well). Unfortunately, a lot of companies are in that western part of the island...
    2. The weather. It's not that it's cold--it's that it varies from -20 to +5 celcius in 24 hours! Actually, when it goes the other way (from +5 to -20), it's even worse because then, it's ice city. City services to clean it up are all right, but sometimes a bit slow, depending where you live. If you live downtown, close to everything, you won't care, but I live in Ville St-Laurent (western part of the island) and I still don't have a car...
    3. If you do have a car, those are probably the worse roads in all of North America. The weird climate doesn't help, of course.


    I think you've also missed what I think are the biggest pluses:

    1. Cost of property is ridiculously low right now. This may change if a bunch of Americans start migrating north, but right now, it's lowest of the big cities in Canada. Note, however, that you're better off owning than renting right now--we're a bit short on rented space, and the only thing keeping my rent from going sky-high is that the government watches rent like a hawk. Note: in Toronto, the government stopped watching rent, and rents are now so high you'd think you're in the States :{)
    2. Cost of living is also ridiculously low. People have mentioned the GST and PST; one should keep in mind those do not apply to basic items (unprepared food and so on), so that, if you shop carefully, you can avoid those on many things. Of course, this depends on your lifestyle.
    3. Restaurants! This is the only city that I know of (except New York, maybe) where you have pretty much every part of the world represented by some restaurant. Also, in most cities, I've noticed you can either get yucky food for relatively little, or great food for a lot. In Montreal, most restaurants are in the middle range--very good food, it's just that the place doesn't look so great. You can get a decent lunch for less than 7$ CDN, and a decent dinner is usually around 12$ CDN. If you hang around the universities, or in Chinatown, it's even less expensive.
    4. Lots of free festivals, shows, and whatnot during the summer (well, your tax dollar pays for it). If you enjoy that sort of thing, of course.


    For sure, don't take my word for it--ask other Montrealers (they may have a different tack on things--of course, we all complain about the weather :{) ). But I think this is a great city.

  257. Good! Go!!! by Meowharishi · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will end up finally bringing the real estate prices in the Bay Area down to the level of the middle class... A shame that its one of the most beautiful cities on Earth and has been made so utterly impossible to live in decently without being a millionaire.

    --
    mje0w!!!1!
  258. Wow. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I love how Canada is referred to as some rural backwater nation....

    But seriously.

    Isn't this what we always talk about in the tech world? Telecommuting? If a person can work from home, why can't a company work from the boonies?

    The country has benefits over the city.. I once had teh opportunity to work at a high-tech startup in a beautiful small canadian town on a lake in BC.

    Now... THAT was perfect. Sure, eventually the office moved to a major center for more political reasons than anything.... but it was excellent. *especially* for those with families.

    No city hassles. Fishing. Community.. etcetera... and the high tech job you like.

  259. Just makes sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are a Dot.com... You have no storefront, your customer never has to walk to your office, you wear pajamas and play foosball all day.

    WHY IN THE $%#& do you need a giant office in the middle of downtown ????

    Most of these Dot.coms really needed a white collar staff of 20 and rest should have been workers in their warehouse in . Pets.com was in San Monica for goodness sakes!

    Of course, even companies that once understood this basic principle are forgetting it. Can you say "Gateway Country" ?!?! They used to say, "Our computers cost less because we build them here in South Dakota. Low Overhead!" Now they should say, "Forget Low Overhead! We are renting expensive storefronts all over the country!"

    One of two people are paying for Gateways move:

    1. Consumers - Higher Prices for Higher Overhead
    OR
    2. Stockholder - Profits go bye-bye with the "High-Overhead/Low Prices Model"

    I do not have an MBA but considering what I have been seeing in business plans recently, an MBA is just another bad investment.

  260. eh? by cuteduo · · Score: 0
    Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot.

    Well if you're an American high tech worker that graduated from MTU (Michigan Technological University) you won't have to learn. At least after spending 5 years there I sounded like the locals who all sound like canadians and northern Minnesotans (ever see Fargo?). The positive side of things is at least we didn't have flapping jaws and beady eyes.

    "Say ya to da UP, eh!"

  261. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you max out your RRSP contributions. And buy a house. And have kids. I'm sitting at 30 some percent, though I have yet to do my taxes, there will probably be a small refund this year.

  262. South Park is insanely moronic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Them's fightin' words, pardner.

  263. How do you spell Canada? by Cola+Junkee · · Score: 1

    Well, that's easy eh.

    You spell it C, eh. N eh., D, eh.

    :)

    Before anyone flames me, I'm a Canuck, born and raised.. ;)

    Personally, I know that Canada as a whole will welcome any of our high tech friends from the States that want to set up shop. In fact, the provinces are practically tripping over themselves trying to attract business with tax breaks for all kinds of things.

    We have to resort to such things, as I'm sure a few people have pointed out, it's a bit colder here, eh.

    But seriously, the summers can be quite hot, and we actually have ALL 4 SEASONS.. I'm always laughing when some recruiter from the states tries to call me during the summer and uses the "good weather" angle on me. I LOVE Canada's summer, it's hot but not sweltering, and the days are longer because we're further north.

    Not to mention the air is cleaner, and you generally don't suffer from the "crush of humanity" .. that is, you can always have lots of personal space because there's plenty to go around. I can't say the same for London or New York..

    Well, my own opinion is that people living in the states don't know what they're missing. If you don't mind being a little behind in company's release schedules for new technology rollouts -- witness the Palm i705's wireless coverage or lack thereof for Canadian cities -- then Canada's a great place to live!

    My $0.02

    --

    f u cn rd ths, u r prbbly a lsy spllr.

  264. Baltimore by humblecoder · · Score: 1

    I am not surprised that Baltimore is mentioned in the article. I lived there for three years and it was definitely a great city to live in. It is big enough so that there are things to do (culture, food, night life, sports, shopping), but it doesn't have the problems that a lot of big cities have. The cost of living is very low (especially compared to Philly and DC), and it hasn't been overdeveloped so there's still isn't the same amount of traffic and crowding as in other big cities.

    As far as high tech goes, there are a surprising number of software and tech companies in the Baltimore region. If you don't mind commuting to the DC area (45 mins south) there are even more jobs.

    Of course, don't forget the crab cakes!!

    PS: I had to move away because my better half got an academic position in another city. Otherwise, we would have stayed there.

  265. Tax Advantages in Canada by helleman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm surprised no one has given one of the biggest reasons why multinationals have moved their R&D operations from the US to Canada - and that is the huge tax breaks the Canadian government makes to companies that do R&D.
    Up to 40% of an engineers salary is paid by the Canadian government!!
    Check out The Washington Business Journal for just one idea of why a company might want to move expensive R&D sites from the US to the great white north.

  266. The INS sucks. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    As someone with experience I'll just say that the US's immigration is screwed up horribly. It isn't just tech workers that get screwed with. They are such a abusive agency that I as a native American was just sick when I started having to be involved with them. IMO they treat people as if they were third rate. It's nothing short of discrimination. It was simply insulting to know our government is sponsoring this sort of filth.

    This new thing where all immigrants and suspected as terrorists is just amazing. As if we didn't have a ton of home grown psychos.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  267. Move to the Al-Queda country ! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1



    Why not move the entire operation to where Osama is hiding, where everything depends on Allah ?

    Don't ever think of Osama Bin Laden and his Al-Queda gang is low-tech.

    You see, they hide their messages with cryptos.

    They have ultra-special, Allah enhanced stealth technology, and they use to hide Osama so well even the SMARTEST bomb of the "great devil" - U.S. of A., that is, - can't find the bearded one.

    And oh, those who slammed the two planes into WTC are HIGH-TECH junkies - for they learn their ways into flying Boeing jets with the flight simulators.

    BTW, you may want to move your operation to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for the Moslem government there still supports Osama Bin Laden, even when they give lip services about "anti-terrorists".

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  268. It's about time.... by Boomer2 · · Score: 1

    Especially for an established company, there are huge negatives and few positives in the high cost areas. And who wouldn't want to slash their wage and real estate costs?

    It's about time companies got a clue and left the high cost areas. You couldn't have made me move to Silicon Valley for anything. Or California, for that matter....

  269. Re:Move to Oklahoma, and meet MORONS by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

    While it's true that ASP is flexible in letting you choose which component you wish to use, the fact remains that VBScript is the overwhelming favorite.

    As an independent contractor seeing a custom component or app written in something other than VBScript running on IIS happens once in a blue moon. I've never seen it, but I always read about someone doing it.

    The bottom line is that VBScript is the dominant choice for ASP much like VB is the dominant choice for writing apps for MS Windows. Other alternatives exist, but they are in the minority.

  270. sounds like oregon by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

    #50 for economic growth in the country - I can believe it too - especially when a former unix/windows sys admin is applying for a hotel desk job and 20 people show up to apply :(. I'm sure they ended up with the best hotel desk clerk on earth - maybe not.

    1. Re:sounds like oregon by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I have a friend who quit his ASP job at www.rileyelectriclog.com and started selling tuxedos for ascot tuxedos because it paid more money. :)

  271. Re:Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and will be the first among them to become a country with less than 50% of its population being white."

    And you consider it a plus ?
    Are fucking nuts ?
    Seriously, show a fucking SINGLE prosperous region (beside Japan) which is not controlled by whites ?

    Sorry, but history shows that every time percentage of non-whites (with exception of some Asian groups) increases, crime rates and general degeneration follow.
    It is true in Canada, London ( which is quickly becoming one of the most dangerous cities in the world) and other places.
    It is simply a fact, you can try to deny it, explain it or whatever but it is a fact.

  272. They could move to St Louis... by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

    St Louis city practically gives away land, tax breaks, and everything else to tech companies. Of course, everyone here wants to locate their business in the county where most of the people live and that negates a lot of the savings if you do. Of course, St Louis county doesn't give you "free" land. heh.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  273. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is fucking wrong with segregation by race ?
    It is not like some governmental body enforced that policy.
    In fact they do everything to prevent it yet people still end up in racially separated neighborhoods.
    You know why ?
    Because it is basic human nature.
    People tend to prefer to live among people with the same cultural and social background.
    It is equally true among Blacks, Whites, Latinos and Asians.
    There is nothing wrong with.

  274. Re:blame canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't come back.
    You seem to like Canada a lot so please do us a favour and stay there.

  275. Canada's Cultural Balance Sheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well okay,,, -Canada does have Rush, but Alanis Morrisette's shrill wench-yelping more than offsets that. How about maybe just one gun, please? A little one? - Scooter

  276. For other Commonwealth residents by downundarob · · Score: 1

    Just think, no more H1B visas (is that what you call them). Would it make it easier for us other Commonwealth residents to move to .CA ??

  277. What? by kryptik_79 · · Score: 1

    or even cities in Canada... What the f**k is that supposed to mean?

  278. it isn't a union issue.... by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

    It may be a moot historical point, but the reason Canada produces cars for the North American market has nothing to do with unionism. It is due to the 1965 Auto Pact, which required a certain percentage of cars sold in Canada to be produced in Canada.

    Automobile manufacturers consequently gravitated to Ontario (Windsor)... from where they could tap the Canadian market, but also be able to accessthe American market. In his later years, Lyndon Johnson would vehemently claim that Lester Pearson (the Canadian PM) "screwed him" over the issue. In Canada, Pearson is remembered fondly for his role as the "father" of United Nations peacekeeping in the Suez Crisis.

    Ironically, Canadian unionism is probably worse than its American variant. At least, this is one of the explanations for the fact that unemployment in Canada is persistently higher than in the US. This last December, for instance, the unemployment rate in Toronto was a "low" 7.5 percent, whereas it peaked at an "outrageous" 6 percent in Silicon Valley.

    The Bank of Canada's refusal to follow a flexible monetary policy is more responsible for Canadian woes than anything else (we live and die by Alan Greenspan too...), but perhaps American techs might be less quick to condemn their northern counterparts if they knew how horribly the economy was managed up here....

    1. Re:it isn't a union issue.... by csbruce · · Score: 2

      the unemployment rate in Toronto was a "low" 7.5 percent, whereas it peaked at an "outrageous" 6 percent in Silicon Valley.

      I have no specific knowledge about why the unemployment rate is structurally higher in Canada, but I would tend to suspect that it has more to do with Canada being more generous with welfare.

      American techs might be less quick to condemn their northern counterparts if they knew how horribly the economy was managed up here....

      My information is that Canada has probably the best-managed economy in the world. Not that I would expect a Canadian to believe that!

  279. Saying "eh?" a lot... by Graabein · · Score: 1
    Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot."

    As opposed to saying "Ahmm..." between every other word like they do now?

    --
    And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  280. heal thy self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while I agree that this persons perception is off in my own opinion, I find it highly amusing how people can do their best to try to sound rational and logical, yet basically only pretty up personal attacks and phrases that only exist to elicit an emotional response. The black helicopters, aluminum hats, etc is really stupid. Instead of being a trained monkey that has a knee jerk reaction and yells out this crap when you can't think of anything else to say to combat someone you don't agree with, why not try being a little mature about it. Otherwise you are only the same rhetoric and irrational fool that you are attacking as such.

  281. irony as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I assume you refer to the liberal definition of the word 'tolerance'. As in "I will support your right to be different, as long as it is some different thing I like and agree with" and of course, "I am against your opinion and decisions to live the life you choose and care nothing of the FACT that you do nothing to harm others, now if you where to change your opinions to be 'open minded' like me, then I will support your right to live as you choose." I see many who self label themselves as 'smart' when it really should only be 'witty' or 'cunning'. Smart implies the ability to reason, using logic for critical thought, which is antithesis to any liberal credo. If on the other hand, someone looked at a liberals STATED desires of tolerance and peace, and actually (through logic and reason) worked to achieve that, then they would not be stuck on rhetoric and picking 'sides' thus falling into the very same closed minded 'yay! my team rules and yours drools" mentality that only results in blind sheepish acceptance of rhetoric and rhetoric spewers without applying any critical thought, much less applying the same criticisms of themselves and the groups/people/policies they support as they dish out to others. (as in hypocricy when they do not do that)

    I have yet to ever meet a sensitive, compassionate or openminded (tolerant) liberal ever. Arrogant, elitist, tyrant-wannabe's are more like it. Try education and setting examples before you hypocritically force others into doing what you yourself are unwilling and unable therefore to do.

  282. Re: "Welcome to Canada, folks ..." (by a US expat) by Eck · · Score: 1
    Since you line 'em up so nice, I have to knock a few down:
    • get paid less as a skilled worker;
    Personally, I make the same number of CA$ as I did US$, and the cost of living overall is different by approximately the same as the exchange rate. The city you live in makes more difference.
    • almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan (which will by dry in 10-20 years)
    My taxes in Alberta are a bit lower than they were in Michigan. Canadians think their taxes are high pretty much the same way Americans do.
    • only one airline, and man does it suck
    Unless you're used to US airlines -- this person obviously never few cross-continent on Northworst. Air Canada, by comparison, is fabulous, although it's gotten worse since merging with Canadian Airlines.
    • yeah, ok - it's a little colder
    Ontario weather is basically the same as Michigan or Upstate New York weather. Alberta is colder but sunnier in the winter, but comparitively dry. It really does feel less cold when there's less humidity, and cooler in the summer (and it's as warm as Michigan summer but without the humidity).
    • the healthcare system is spiralling downwards due to funding shortages passed onto the provinces from a sneaky federal government that wants to report a "surplus"
    This is true, and it's worst in Alberta. In another decade, it might be as bad as in the US!
    • lack of world class cities and attractions
    That would be the Canadian inferiority complex talking. Here in Edmonton, it's driven them to build the biggest mall in the world (competing with the Japanese, not that little "Mall of America"), not that a mall with a roller coaster at one end, water park in another, dolphins in a third, and a skating rink is that much of an attraction, throw the biggest folk music festival in the world (efmf.ab.ca), and maintain the most wooded city parkland of any city in Canada (or maybe North America?) -- off the top of my head.
  283. Re:Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wi by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    San Francisco and Silicon Valley has an enormous critical mass of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/Trans people, and Nerds. The counter-culture continues to thrive here.
    Ditto for Montréal. After all, that's where MafiaBoy lives...
  284. Re: Oz by aebrain · · Score: 1
    We've seen the Foster's commercials. Is Australia really like that?

    Yes.

    Canberra, Australian Capital Territory : Only 100 out of our 135 snake species are poisonous.

    --
    Zoe Brain - Rocket Scientist
  285. Homosexuals must be nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only people that should be raising hell about marrage, in any form, are heterosexuals. Homosexuals should not be getting in line for the beurocracy and police state of marrage.

    It should be none of the government's business who you married, dumped, dumped you, etc.

    If you want to make arrangements to arbitrairly steal property and future wages from each other after you break up, do it as a business partnership and have it on paper first.

    Before you start that nonsense of women not making as much money as met blah, blah, blah, then you must advocate every woman being "issued" a man for her care. Sorry, I believe women are perfectly able to care for themselves without the help of a man and without the help of a lifetime paycheck from a man too.

    Same deal with homosexual marrage. What do you want, poor gays assigned to rich gays for financial life? How about being orientation neutral and assign poor people to rich people, on a personal lifetime basis?

    BTW, the guy defining tolerance/intolerance on this thread is dead on. Nobody cares what your sexual orientation is in this country. Just because I can do without the public announcements by ANYBODY about their sexual activity does not mean that I am intolerant of your orientation.

  286. Hey Now by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I never said that Americans don't talk funny, or hear funny, for that matter. Being from the Beantown area myself, I am the first to say that we sound odd to those not in the area, and also to say that writing the Canadian "about" is difficualt to do. "Aboot" is as close as the written word can really come without a footnote.

    Also, Bostoners don't say the word "car". They say the word "cah" and the rest of the nation spells it wrong.8)

    Virg

  287. Calgary vs Chicago by wumingzi · · Score: 1

    I'm from the coast, and thus the deserving butt of all those jokes people make about Vancouverites (and their wimpy southern cousins from the Oregon Territory as well). Any place where a nice winter day is -20 is unfit for man or beast. Go ahead and say it's a dry cold. I don't buy it.

    :-)