Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Shuts Down Lik Sang

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft has taken legal action, shutting down popular import gaming site Lik Sang for distributing X-box mod chips. Lik Sang is a popular import gaming site based out of Hong Kong. The full article (MSNBC) can be found here." Several people have pointed to the same story on news.com.

581 comments

  1. As a general rule by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 1

    Microsoft doesn't shut people down. Therefore, modchips must really, really piss them off.

    --

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
    1. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but what grounds does microsoft have to do this

      I really can't see why modchips should be illegal. They should just void the warranty, and possibly forbit you from getting support.

    2. Re:As a general rule by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      the fear of linux is growing in the minds of the m$ people......
      why else would one use a mod chip?

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    3. Re:As a general rule by arbitrary+nickname · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Aren't most XBox mod chips basically BIOS replacements? Probably containing significant portions of Microsoft's original XBox BIOS?...

      So it'd be a simple case of copyright infringement.

      Everything else Lik-Sang sold, including GBA 'backup devices', PSX mods, and perfectly legit consoles, games, and accessories, were probably perfectly legal in most countries. Maybe they made a genuine mistake by stocking the XBox mods - not knowing they may have contained Microsoft's code?

    4. Re:As a general rule by Squareball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is insane! I mean, what if Ford started shutting down shops that trick out cars? Would the people stand for that? My rule, if I buy it, it's MINE! I don't give a darn WHAT the EULA says. EULA isn't exactly a strong legal document.

    5. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about: to play pirated games downloaded off those evil P2P programs out there. You can usually download hacked games within days of their retail release. Microsoft may be willing to take a loss on the XBox units themselves, but they expect to make the money back in game sales. If people buy the units and download pirated copies of the games, MS will lose way too much money.

    6. Re:As a general rule by N3WBI3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ahh so kill em all and let God sort them out? Whats that you want to back up your games, well screw you because little Billy down the street is a theif so you probably are to...

      --
    7. Re:As a general rule by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2

      That didn't work for the Aibo. You buy the product, not the technology. Right or wrong, that's the way it is.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    8. Re:As a general rule by kableh · · Score: 2

      IANAL (where have I heard that before), but I am willing to bet that is EXACTLY why they got shut down.

      Why they are bothering, on the other hand, is beyond me. It is fairly simple to buy a flash chip for 5 bucks, flash it yourself, and mod away. The cat is out of the bag!

      I have to agree with the Dreamcast fans though. This really sucks for those of us with a significant investment in our DCs, as Lik-Sang had nice 3rd party stuff for them.

    9. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really go out on a limb to make assumptions about something you have no knowledge of.
      This is an example of how bad information starts. Someone makes an assumption to fit a predefined mental outcome.

      No, the bios is not on the chips.
      I know very little about the mod chips, so this is an assumption based on working with PICs (mod chips are typically programmable chips) in the past: Think of the device more as a packet sniffer and injector. It looks for different signals and when a predefined signal or group of signals are found, it can inject signals into the path in order to get around the protection measures that microsoft has set up.

    10. Re:As a general rule by buswolley · · Score: 1
      And because Billy down the road is a thief.., i need to make back-ups of my games.. because he keeps breaking into my house.

      Same logic.. but different conclusion.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    11. Re:As a general rule by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      What the hell are you talking about man? I am saying that I should not be punished for doing something both legal and ethical (its a 2fer) because someone else may be doing something illegal, and you respond with he is doing something illegal and thats why I want to back up my games?

      I need to make back ups of my games because I have a little brother who loves sand papaer, or an amerous english pug who is eyeing my game collection.. its non of your damn buisness why I need backups.

      That being said if I give a game to little Billy I have just stolen from you, the thing is in America we are innocent until proven guilty.

      --
    12. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1- You really go out on a limb to make assumptions about something you have no knowledge of.

      2- I know very little about the mod chips

      So.. in otherwords.. shut up.

    13. Re:As a general rule by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think you can back up an xBox game anyway, at least not on a standard DVD burner. I had read that the discs spun backwards, precisely so that normal DVD burners couldn't copy them. Is this true, or just a rumor? Or is there a simple workaround?

    14. Re:As a general rule by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      The Xbox mod chips did contain unencrypted, hacked version of the original Xbox BIOS.

    15. Re:As a general rule by FakeMonkeyAutomaton · · Score: 2, Informative
      You are correct, most are BIOS replacements...

      ...which is why most sellers are selling blank chips and programmers. Users are expected to go out and find something to flash on the chip. Of course anyone who can find game disk images to burn will have little trouble finding a bios to flash on their mod.

      I do not know if Lik-Sang was following this practice or not. This easy programmability will certainly make it more difficult for MS to write checks in future releases that stop games from running on modded consoles, however.

    16. Re:As a general rule by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      No clue, I dont own an xbox. But if I did and I could I would want to back up my games, or I might want to run an OS on it (its a pretty good piece of hardware).

      --
    17. Re:As a general rule by buswolley · · Score: 1
      I think we have a miscommunication. I was greeing with you and disagreeing with Microsoft.

      M$:If lil Billy is a thief, so am I. therefore, modding should be illegal. thats the m$ position.

      My position was:lil Billy down the street is a thief, he breaks into my house and steals my games. therefore I need to back-up my games.(I'm talking about the crack-head that keeps stealin my shit everytime im gone)

      Microsoft and I have the same logic, but different conclusions.

      You misread me, or jumped to a conclusion.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    18. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you could put your games up where you dog and kid brother can get them. However, since you are a lazy self absorbed asshole there is another alternative. Microsoft has never had a problem in the past with replacing media. You just send them the damaged media along with proof of purchase and they will send you a replacement for the cost of shipping. Now, you don't need to waste the time and resources backing them up, and you no longer need a circumvention device to play your pirated^H^H^H^H^H^H "backup" copies.

    19. Re:As a general rule by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      oic, I did misread...

      --
    20. Re:As a general rule by buswolley · · Score: 1

      man you replied qiuck, i thought i just sent it. :)

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    21. Re:As a general rule by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Well as you are an intrusive, rude, and self rightous asshole, there is another alternative. You get the hell out of where I put my games or what I do to a piece of hardware I put good money out for. You just turn your sorry ass around and get the hell outta my house. Now you dont need to waste the time and effort telling me what to do with **MY** time and **MONEY**, and you no onger need to yell at others to support a shitty buisness model.

      --
    22. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, thieves are so sensitive these days. What's a matter? No longer gonna be the "leet" kid in your neighborhood anymore cause you can't get the games from your "inside connections"? Maybe you can start buying your stuff from now on instead of being a leech.

    23. Re:As a general rule by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Well dipshit, I own legally everything I use. you are a perfect fit for M$ a moron who thinks everyone is a tiheif who does not want you in their buisness..

      --
    24. Re:As a general rule by kasperd · · Score: 2

      So it'd be a simple case of copyright infringement.

      But every user already has legally purcased said software. So it might not be illegal. In the country where I live, some modifications of copyrighted software is legal.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    25. Re:As a general rule by e2d2 · · Score: 2

      Exactly, If they had their way you would only rent your entire life as a service and own nothing. You will not be allowed to fix anything and only authorized technicians will do so. Your clothes will come with a EULA which specifies the period of time that you can wear them, after which you will have to upgrade. Expiration dates on milk will now be a binding contract.

      The idea of ownership is quickly being erased by Madison Avenue and the Globochem legal department because it doesn't offer enough return value to investors. They seek the golden egg and if they can't find it they will create it with an army of lawyers and lobbyists.

    26. Re:As a general rule by b0r1s · · Score: 2

      Ford doesn't sell cars at a loss, knowing that people have to buy gas/parts from them.

      Microsoft does sell consoles at a loss, making nearly all of their money on the games sold for the consoles. Mod chips allow people to pirate games, and thus cost not only microsoft, but the original authors of the game substantial amounts of money.

      I have no problem with Microsoft shutting down people that sell aids in priracy. As a software developer, I respect their ability to own their software, no matter what form it may take. If the users disagree with this, they should not be buying Microsoft consoles.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    27. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft does sell consoles at a loss, making nearly all of their money on the games sold for the consoles. Mod chips allow people to pirate games, and thus cost not only microsoft, but the original authors of the game substantial amounts of money.

      Well, gee, doesn't that seem to indicate there's something wrong with that business model then? Whatever happened to letting the market decide?
    28. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      e2d2 wrote:
      Expiration dates on milk will now be a binding contract.

      I don't know about you, but I already consider the expiration date on milk to be a binding contract.
    29. Re:As a general rule by geekee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if people start incorporating open source software into proprietary code and violate the GPL? Not so ok anymore when the shoe is on the other foot. But when MS does it, everyone's up in arms.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    30. Re:As a general rule by anotherone · · Score: 2

      It's a rumor. They use normal DVDs.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    31. Re:As a general rule by MaxVolume · · Score: 0

      Dear Moron, It is legal to make a backup of copyright'ed material. Therefore, you really can't call that piracy. I always play the "copy" of each playstation game I own and store the originals in the safe place. Anyone who pays for their games, knows how much they are worth, and this is a legal mathod to protect ones investment.

    32. Re:As a general rule by gfxguy · · Score: 1
      I have no problem with Microsoft shutting down people that sell aids in priracy. As a software developer, I respect their ability to own their software, no matter what form it may take.
      So you have no problem with digital rights management being required on all devices capable of storing content digitally?

      Should blank CDs and other media be illegal?

      Your VCR should be illegal, too, I suppose?

      I don't own an XBox, but if I did I would by a chip because I want to run Linux on it, not because I want to pirate.

      Now, if MS has a problem with selling their consoles at a loss, then they probably shouldn't be selling their consoles at a loss.
      If the users disagree with this, they should not be buying Microsoft consoles.
      With that I can agree - and if I was considering buying an XBox for Linux (and I was), I'm not anymore. So they will lose the sale of the games that I'd get to go along with it.

      Just goes to show, IMO, that the more money they waste on fighting piracy, the more money they will lose in sales (and then blame piracy anyway). I'm not advocating piracy, but I think it's time companies realized there has to be an acceptable level to keep your honest customers happy.
      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    33. Re:As a general rule by modecx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, I find that my milk usually stays quite usable up to a week and a half after the due date. Horizon Organic milk, and Lucerne, have always been quite robust milks, as far as I'm concerned. My local dairy produces some damn good milk, as well.

      Now I need a freaking brownie, so I can get some milk... See what you've done?!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    34. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Divx on a TV, MAME, backups, imports, developing games, MP3 player...
      There are lots of other reasons to use a mod chip besides Linux. And if i had to guess, less that 5% of all modchip users have linux on their console, or would install it if they had it.

      I would guess that they are more worried about people going to blockbuster, renting games, and ripping them (which you can do with a mod chip and Evolution X).

    35. Re:As a general rule by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Microsoft does sell consoles at a loss

      Dumping and price fixing are often illegal. I doubt they're being sold at a loss considering the legal problems they could expose themselves to. Maybe they are being sold at cost.

      Either way, this is their problem, nobody else's. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!

      >I have no problem with Microsoft shutting down people that sell aids in priracy.

      They aid in making backups so your kids don't destroy your hard earned property.

      If you disbelieve that, then JVC and Sony are both horrible companies, since they both created VTR, which is just as useful for pirating movies as a modchip is for pirating games on the X-Box.

      >As a software developer, I respect their ability to own their software, no matter what form it may take.

      I might not be a software developer, but I also respect the right of a software developer to do independant research on a system and create their own software for it, indepenently. I also support the right of another software developer to modify someone else's work, much in the way I would support someone drawing on the Mona Lisa (assuming they owned it). Not that it's always a nice thing, but if you own it, it's your right (and, unlike the Mona Lisa, X-Box firmware isn't a scarce resource).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    36. Re:As a general rule by harvardian · · Score: 4, Informative
      The fact that this post was modded up shows how zealous and unthinking so many people on this site are.

      The EULA doesn't have ANYTHING TO DO with the shutting down of this website. Microsoft would most likely be suing Lik Sang for violating either the DMCA or IP rights (more likely IP rights, I would think, but IANAL). Microsoft has said before that they're NOT interested in punishing individual mod chippers, just mass distributors of mod chips.

      Thus, you MAY do whatever you want to YOUR XBox and Microsoft won't care. The only caveat to this is if you're logged onto XBox Live -- Microsoft has reserved the right in the Live EULA to revoke the login rights of people with mod chips. This may piss some of you off, but do you really want people with mod chips on XBox Live? No, it could turn into CounterStrike before PunkBuster, with half of the people online cheating.

    37. Re:As a general rule by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Gamecube discs spin backwards. That's probably what you were thinking of.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    38. Re:As a general rule by reallocate · · Score: 2

      I suppose if Ford pulled this kind of stunt, I'd be inclined to not buy a Ford.

      So...if you've got a mad on about MS, don't buy MS. You might not like the EULA, but once you rip off the shrinkwrap, they've got you. You can keep on shouting that you believe the EULA is worthless but you'd have to go to court to defend that claim. My guess is their lawyers are bigger than your lawyers.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    39. Re:As a general rule by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this whole "backup" arguement. I play many games on PC and Consoles and never had one "go bad" (and I also lend out my games). Also, games generally have a very short time span (there are exceptions like Counterstrike). Just like a regular warranty, if it does go bad within 30 days, I'm sure the publisher will replace it for you. If you're using them as coasters, well...

    40. Re:As a general rule by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

      I don't understand this whole "backup" arguement. I play many games on PC and Consoles and never had one "go bad" (and I also lend out my games).

      I'm not so worried about "going bad" as I am about theft, real theft. I lost a lot of CDs a while back when I had my truck broken into, made me really wish I had backed them up and used the backups in my truck, instead of the originals.
      I've had several friends have thier house/apartment broken into and computer equipment taken, including games that were readily accessable. Again, if they had been using backups and had the original tucked away in a closet (which didn't seem to get searched) they would not have been out a couple hundred in computer software.
      Sadly, myself and my friends had to learn the hard way, that there are some very good reasons not to use the originals. I've also fallen victim to leaving my CD carrier in my car in the summer, its amazing what can happen. I know it was my own stupidity that caused it, but if I had taken precautions well in advance, it would not have been a big deal.
      I now like to use backups whenever possible, and keep my originals tucked away, nice and safe.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    41. Re:As a general rule by Squareball · · Score: 2

      Fine, then let's shut down Discount Auto Parts, Pep Boys, Auto Zone et al. They sell parts that aren't FROM FORD but will work on Ford cars, and will modify the ford car you bought. Don't you get it?

    42. Re:As a general rule by Squareball · · Score: 2

      And what if EVERY SINGLE car manufacturer did this? What would you do then? Not buy a car? What if it was federal law that NO ONE could sell 3rd party accesories for cars? What if it was illegal for you to go to the local Auto Zone and buy a new gas cap and install it your self? What if it was illegal to buy a CD Player for your car because it didn't come from Ford or Mercedes but rather PINE or Panasonic? What would you think then? What if this was all FEDERAL law (as the DMCA is)? The point is.. where does this stop?

    43. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, but as we all know PB on CS was easily worked around.... Just a thought, but do you honsetly think they will be able to detect MOD chips on Live? The whole point to the MOD chip is to circumvent built in devices that prevent using these games. There will be a MOD chip for MOD chips to play on Live...

    44. Re:As a general rule by Yakko · · Score: 1
      their lawyers are bigger than your lawyers

      That's all that matters, actually. I mean, merit of the little guy's arguments be damned...

      I wonder if there's a mod chip out there that can't be struck down in court. Isn't the issue at hand about mod chips with MS's BIOS (or a derivative) included, anyway? Alas, the cynical side of me says that if MICROS~1 doesn't like it, they can just bankrupt whoever's doing the dirty deed...

      Doesn't matter; I definitely won't buy an xbox, and the fact that it's from MS is becoming a bigger part of the reason I made that decision. Right now, the main repellant is the lack of content that I find interesting.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    45. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't know what dumping is. Dumping is selling products at a loss in order to drive competitors out of business, at which point the price is raised to profitable levels and the losses are recovered. This is essentially manipulating the market to allow the producer with the deepest pockets to kill off all the competitors and then push up prices.

      Selling consoles at a loss (which has long been the standard practice in the industry) is not dumping, merely strategic price management. People who buy consoles generally buy games as well (unless they're pirates or maybe Linux geeks), and so their purchases form a sort of 'package deal'. The losses on the console hardware are smaller than the combined profit from selling a specific number of games, so once the customer has bought enough games, the overall transaction becomes profitable, hence there is no manipulation of the market.

      This happens all the time in other markets as well, e.g. supermarket specials selling bread below cost in the expectation that the people who buy it will also buy something to put on it (with a sufficient margin to make the overall transaction profitable).

    46. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How you can say that with a straight face is beyond me. That is bull-fucking-ass-cock-shit. 100% bullshit situation pulled out of your ass. If you paid for a modchip, you are damn well not going to buy games at retail price (Unless you have a Classic PSX modchip which costs less than a game and not more like any other modchip for any other system)

    47. Re:As a general rule by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Beats me where it's going to stop. Pretty sure preventing it will take more than pseudonymous Slashdot posters giving their caps keys a workout.

      The car analogy breaks down without much effort. Seen from Microsoft's viewpoint (with which I am not concurring), one's acquisition of software or hardware is more akin to renting than to purchase. Their analogy might be: You've rented a car from me. You signed a rental contract that prevents you from making any mechanical or cosmetic changes to the car.

      The notion of "renting" rather than "buying and owning" seems to go hand-in-hand with the notion of licensing software. When possession of a software program transfers to you -- commercial, free, open source, etc. -- you acquire a license to use the recorded binary representation of the translated source code. You do not own the source code. Note that the program may be transferred on CD, on floppy, over the Internet, or in a chip in a game box.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    48. Re:As a general rule by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Have to admit that, for the life of me, I've never been able to sustain interest in any game for more than 30 seconds. They're all a big yawn to me.

      The merits of a legal or political case won't do anyone any good unless someone has the willingness and the resources to argue those merits in the right places and at the right times. No matter how principled your own position, other people can take an opposing, but equally principled, position. Liekwise, many not-so-principled people will recognize the merits of your position but work to defeat you simply because your loss will be their gain.

      Ranting about the evils of MS on Slashdot is preaching to the choir, pure and simple. Just noise without substance, Nothing will happen. Thwarting MS, or the RIAA, etc., requires the creation of countervailing legal, political and economic forces.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    49. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >My position was:lil Billy down the street is a thief, he breaks into my house and steals my games. therefore I need to back-up my games.(I'm talking about the crack-head that keeps stealin my shit everytime im gone)

      Hmm, good point BUT: If lil Billy steals one of your games, he's the new owner of that game. Question: Is it allowed to play a so called "Backup", although you don't own the game anymore? Is it allowed to own a private backup, if someone stole the original copy?
      Who's the legal owner of the stolen game?

      If so, everybody could pretend, that he only plays the backup because someone has stolen his original one.

      weird.

    50. Re:As a general rule by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      In my opinion this post shows where the backup argument becomes wrong. Yes, if you drop a disc and it gets scratched, you should be able to use a backup of it. You paid for the game, not the disc itself. However in your case the game is being physically stolen, someone else now can take your game to a pawnshop where someone else can buy it legitimatly. This indeed does take money away from the content producers. You are essentially trying to place the burden of acts of theft directed at you onto the content producers themselves. If this were legal, things like this could happen: You buy a game, you burn a backup copy of the game, you place the game on your front porch and advertise that it is there, unguarded, your friend swipes the game. Now you and your friend have 2 games for the price of 1. When someone steals something, it is of course the fault of the theif; of course, a good amount of the blame can go to whoever was responsible for keeping it "unstolen." In your case you wish to shift this blame, and fiscal responsibility, onto the content producers themselves even though they were not responsible from keeping it "unstolen."

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    51. Re:As a general rule by Ataru · · Score: 0

      If lil Billy steals one of your games, he's the new owner of that game.

      Is he fuck!

    52. Re:As a general rule by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      then perhaps we will sue the people doing the copyright infringement rather than someone making tools that enable it. Why don't you read the article; people who are doing the actual violating of copyrights are NOT being attacked, it is rather the people that are making modchips that CAN enable the violations of copyrights, they CAN enable other, legal, things. Please understand the issues before posting, or at least give a good example of something the open source community would do (like perhaps: What if someone made a compiler designed to purposfully make the bytecode product of it not resemble that of a traditional compiler, thus making it hard to tell if there was a GPL violation; would you, the open source community, not try and have their website shutdown in the same heavy-handed manner as microsoft?(I personally think the answer is hell no we wouldn't, but if you had at least given an example we could have had some debate.)

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    53. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are just DVD-9's (dual layer) so in theory unless you have a dual layer burner you can't copy them.

      However many people back up their Xbox games so this is obviusly not the case

    54. Re:As a general rule by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Dumping is selling products at a loss in order to drive competitors out of business, at which point the price is raised to profitable levels and the losses are recovered.

      And this is different from how console manufacturers are operating right now... how?

      They are all selling their consoles at a loss (or so people seem to think) to attact business to their side, thereby ensuring the other side goes out of business.

      >People who buy consoles generally buy games as well (unless they're pirates or maybe Linux geeks), and so their purchases form a sort of 'package deal'.

      So if Proctor-Silex bought Westons, and gave toasters away for free to put Hamilton-Beach out of business, that would be OK because Proctor-Silex would still make money on the toast, right?

      Now, unlike bread, computer goods continually cost less to manufacture. In two years, that price will be profitable, and someone may have won or lost the console "war". Sega comes to mind as the current loser.

      Price dumping it is. It's just that the industry cartel hasn't been found out yet. But, just like the vitamin cartel, it will happen, given time.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    55. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice argument!

    56. Re:As a general rule by ChopsMIDI · · Score: 1
      If lil Billy steals one of your games, he's the new owner of that game.

      So if Lil Billy steals your car, is he the new owner of your car?

      What if he busts into your house and steals your TV?

      --

      How could I say to men: "Speak louder, shout! For I am deaf!"? -Ludwig van Beethoven
    57. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not dumping. The losses are recovered through the sale of add-ons (games in this case), not by increasing the price after the competitors have been driven from the market.

      Now if, say, Microsoft, were to sell both consoles and the games at loss-making prices low enough to make Sony consoles/games unattractive to the average consumer, it would indeed be dumping. It would probably work too (drive Sony out of the market), since Microsoft's pockets are the deepest around, but it's not about to happen.

    58. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like the EULA, don't buy the product.

      Its pretty ignorant to welch on a contract just cause you didn't like the terms in the first place.

    59. Re:As a general rule by IronChef · · Score: 2

      ...not knowing they may have contained Microsoft's code?

      I believe most Xbox mod chips are shipped BLANK for just this reason.

    60. Re:As a general rule by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      I'm not so worried about "going bad" as I am about theft, real theft.

      What if they steal the backups? ;)

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    61. Re:As a general rule by malfunct · · Score: 1

      The latest generation of mod chips were COMPLETE replacement bios's. They connected to the LPC bus of the xbox and forced the boot sequence to load the bios from the mod instead of loading it from the original bios. The code on the mod chips could also be flashed into the original bios if you knew what you were doing which allowed you to replace the bios without having to keep the hardward modifications in place.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    62. Re:As a general rule by shepd · · Score: 1

      >It would probably work too (drive Sony out of the market), since Microsoft's pockets are the deepest around, but it's not about to happen.

      Me thinks you missed what I said:

      "It's just that the industry cartel hasn't been found out yet."

      It's easy to run a cartel based oligopoly, which is what's going on right now in the console business, IMHO. They simply dump their consoles on the market in unison, that's all that's necessary. If a competitor is out of the loop, too bad.

      If I designed a console, and had just enough money to make the first 1000, would I be able to sell them at a profit and survive?

      No, because then my game console would cost $600, and I would be unable to operate my business at a loss, because I am not funded by other arms of my company (as there would be none), and I would lack the cash to wait it out until I recouped enough money from game sales to cause a net profit.

      I think the competitors have already been driven out of the market a long time ago by the then current big four -- Sega, Nintendo, Sony, and Atari.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    63. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You show more about your OWN lack of ethics, as opposed to demonstrating any kind of point.

      I've done exactly what he said he's done for every game I've bought (with the exception of PS2 games for now - that will change when I have a DVD burner)

      Just because you can't imagine being honest doesn't mean these people don't exist.

    64. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just fine, so long as you can actually see the EULA without buying the product first. I have yet to see this come to pass with any EULA-d product.

    65. Re:As a general rule by Ataru · · Score: 0

      Did you mean to reply to the parent of my comment? Because I think we are in agreement.

    66. Re:As a general rule by Ataru · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

    67. Re:As a general rule by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you for clearing that one up. Seems like overkill, they already use an odd size.

    68. Re:As a general rule by ChopsMIDI · · Score: 1
      Did you mean to reply to the parent of my comment? Because I think we are in agreement.

      Yup. I did mean to reply to the parent.

      --

      How could I say to men: "Speak louder, shout! For I am deaf!"? -Ludwig van Beethoven
    69. Re:As a general rule by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      What if they steal the backups? ;)

      As I understand "Fair Use", the backup copies are only legitimate in the possession of the owner of the original. If someone steals them, they've no Fair Use right to the data, and the copy is no longer legitimate, just as it would not be if the original owner "shared" it with a friend. Of course if you leave the copy around unsecured and tell your friend where to 'steal' it, that's approximately the same thing. If someone steals the original and leaves you with your backup, it still works the same way. The backup is no longer legitimate.

      So, keep those originals secured!

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    70. Re:As a general rule by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      Wanna buy a China-enigmah chip? I have a couple for sale.

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    71. Re:As a general rule by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      You seem to be saying that any method that results in the "content producers" getting fewer sales has shifted the "replacement burden" from the consumer back to the "content producers."

      You seem to be using circular logic. Are you suggesting that all crime victims are to blame for providing an opportunity for a crime to be committed? One reason that presumption is absurd is that criminals are the ones *by definition* who are performing a crime. Whether it is easy or very difficult for them is irrelevant - a theif is a theif.

      But in your example, both parties could be found guilty, since the one party was advertising (and therefore conspiring) with the person doing the physical stealing.

      To extend your logic further, it would be theft to restore from backup, a CD that was melted accidentally by sunlight!

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    72. Re:As a general rule by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Dumping and price fixing are often illegal. I doubt they're being sold at a loss considering the legal problems they could expose themselves to. Maybe they are being sold at cost.

      Every financial article ever written on the gaming industry in the last year, whether it's from Bloomberg, the Financial Times, the Economist, or just the business section of your local newspaper, disagrees with you. Microsoft loses approximately $100-$150 on each sale now. It might have gone down to $80 since their new modifications to the hardware.

    73. Re:As a general rule by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      As a software developer, I respect their ability to own their software, no matter what form it may take.

      I guess that also includes the form of "Bought by a user that wants to use it in a perfectly legal way". They may own their software, but I own it after I've bought it and should be allowed to exercise my legal rights over it. Unfortunately, the MHOL (Microsoft Horde of Lawyers), a larger and stronger body of "law" enforcement than the US Department of Justice or the entire governments of many smaller countries, disagrees.

    74. Re:As a general rule by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Every financial article ever written on the gaming industry in the last year, whether it's from Bloomberg, the Financial Times, the Economist, or just the business section of your local newspaper, disagrees with you.

      Yeah, after I wrote that I rethought myself...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    75. Re:As a general rule by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      It's all about money. Microsoft sells the XBox hardware at a loss. It gets a royalty for each licenced game sold by 3rd-party game developers. The XBox BIOS checks that a game is "properly signed" before allowing it to run.

      If not for this check, any developer could write and sell XBox games without Bill Gates seeing a single penny. And Bill wouldn't like that.

      Think of it as Palladium v0.9.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    76. Re:As a general rule by iapetus · · Score: 2

      The fact that this post was modded up shows how zealous and unthinking so many people on this site are. :b

      I can't remember the last console that needed to be modded in order to apply cheats. Action Replay and similar titles have been available for consoles for many generations now. There's already one out for the PS2, and one ready for release on GC. It's this sort of program MS needs to target to avoid online cheating, not the modchip manufacturers.

      Well, that and encourage development practices that make it harder to cheat in this way...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    77. Re:As a general rule by Jagen · · Score: 1

      Fool, in no way can buying an Xbox be construed as renting, you pay money for it, you own it. There is no way Microsoft can take it back from you, you didnt sign any agreement when you purchased it and there isnt one in the box.

      So in fact its exactly like buying a car, and the car analogy works better still, buying a cat replacement may mean that your car would put out illegal amounts of emissions, doesnt stop them being sold. Understand?

    78. Re:As a general rule by evbergen · · Score: 2

      What Bill or anyone else *likes* to do or to get is not an argument in evaluating the rights and wrongs of such issues.

      If business models such as this are only possible by having people rent the boxes instead of *own* them, then that should be done instead of leading people to believe they have *bought* something.

      After all, the US regards ownership of property as the highest goal for humanity? It does make you wonder though who's in charge if the latest laws are more concerned about ownership by some cartels than ownership by the people.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    79. Re:As a general rule by Graf · · Score: 1

      Gamecube discs don't spin backwards. I've looked.

    80. Re:As a general rule by ameoba · · Score: 2

      [blockquote]
      Think of it as Palladium v0.9.
      [/blockquote]

      Yes, and the first step towards Microsoft requiring systems to ONLY run 'authorized' operating systems. I can easily see this leading to a point, akin to 'motorheads' disliking any car made after the late 70s (where all the onboard computers severely limited the ammoun of maintenance yourself without purchasing expensive diagnostic equipment) where us 'geeks' collect and maintain hardware that's increasingly outdated in order to keep our freedoms.

      great fun.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    81. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if Lil Billy steals your car, is he the new owner of your car?

      In a way - yes (althoug not the legal one)!
      I don't know how such incidents are handled by law.
      If he steals my car, I can't go to Mr. X and steal his car.
      I may (and will) go to the police and my insurance to report the case.

      What if he busts into your house and steals your TV?
      Use my backup-TV ? ;-)

    82. Re:As a general rule by geekee · · Score: 1

      I read the article. It is illegal to sell a product whose sole use is for an illegal activity. That's what the company selling the mod chips is doing. That's why MS is shutting them down. It's illegal.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    83. Re:As a general rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the modchip doesn't even come with any software on the bios. It is completely blank. I'm not sure if liksang shipped their pre-modded ones with a bios or not but I don't see how a blank modchip could be that illegal.

    84. Re:As a general rule by neoprene · · Score: 1

      if little billy steals your tv, then i guess you wont be playing your unmodded xbox.

  2. Abuse of power? by gleffler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So MS can shut down an entire company for selling one product they don't like (selling a mod chip is not illegal where Liksang is located) by slapping them with a legal action?

    It just goes to show you how abusive MS is, as if you needed any more evidence.

    1. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      "It just goes to show you how abusive MS is, as if you needed any more evidence."

      Oh really? Well I have a question for ya then:

      Let's say you made a product intended to sell games. You are forced to sell it at a loss because of market pressure. You need to sell 4 games for every system sold to make your money back. Unfortunately, the likeness of your machine to a PC encourages people to buy the system (costing you money) without serious consideration to buying games as well.

      Would you not shut down a place making chips that threaten your profitability? I think you would.

      Sorry, but 'abusive' is not the word I'd use. Microsoft did not get big by running around and pissing people off. Most anti-MS zealots don't seem to understand that.

    2. Re:Abuse of power? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      So basically you're saying

      "I'm selling a product at a loss using the assumption people will give me money later on"

      Well if the X-Box is such a loss for MS maybe they should leave the console business?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Abuse of power? by krasni_bor · · Score: 1
      You are forced to sell it at a loss because of market pressure.


      Nobody is forcing them to market a game console. It was their own stupid idea.
    4. Re:Abuse of power? by Copperhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You are forced to sell it at a loss because of market pressure.

      How is anyone "forcing" Microsoft to do anything?

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    5. Re:Abuse of power? by gleffler · · Score: 1

      Businesswise, I would probably try/want to do so. The issue is that *legally*, I could not. Mod chips aren't illegal in Hong Kong. MS has no business playing government, abusing their monopoly power, and shutting down L-S with a thousand lawyers because their own business model requires X game purchases. That isn't L-S's problem, and I hope the Chinese government throws out Microsoft's lawsuit as the frivolous piece of junk it is.

    6. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the parent marked as a troll but it was correcting the original troll taht claimed all consoles sell at a loss... any true geek knows this is not true.

    7. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2
      So basically you're saying

      "I'm selling a product at a loss using the assumption people will give me money later on"

      Well if the X-Box is such a loss for MS maybe they should leave the console business


      Following that logic, Sony, Nintendo, and Gillette would not be in business today.
    8. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are people crying foul on MS? Sony did THE EXACT SAME THING.

      Mod chips are to consoles as P2P is to music.

      They all (read: NOT JUST MS) hate the fact that people modify the hardware to play burned games. It doesn't matter if it also lets you play foreign games. 99% of the people are using it for the illegal part, not the legal part.

    9. Re:Abuse of power? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      Ok so I create a product which is inferior (either in terms of production cost or performance) to other products in the market. So in order to gain market share against the companies who **DO** make money I have to sell at a loss (again not due to the market as others in the market make $$, but do to the fact it cost me too much money to make my product, or its not as good os the competition).

      So now I am saying to myself, how do I make money with the expensive piece of crap? Ok I will sign a deal with people who want to make games for my system.

      So your question is what would I do? I would not get into a market against superior competition (in this case Nintendo, and Sony) with a product which is so poorly engineered that it cost much more per unit than any one elses, tie myself to slaes of accessories (not even my products) and hope I could use a legal club to keep people from using it any other way than the one which fits my piss poor Buisness plan.

      M$ got big on chance, the mistakes of others (Apple), and stolen source code. They have smartly used their opponets weaknesses to maintain and expand their influence.

      --
    10. Re:Abuse of power? by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      I honestly can't believe you're asking that question.

      If Microsoft sold the X-Box for $400, do you HONESTLY thing many people would buy it when there are two alternatives?

      If they want to sell any of them, they're FORCED to compete with the prices of the other consoles, or nobody will buy one.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    11. Re:Abuse of power? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen Nintendo screaming and yelling cuz of flash carts..

      In fact the whole reason why I bought my GBA was because I wanted to program it..

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Why is the parent marked as a troll but it was correcting the original troll taht claimed all consoles sell at a loss... any true geek knows this is not true."

      Nope, you're both wrong. Playstation 2, for example, sold at a $100 loss in Japan. This is actually quite a common thing in the game industry. The original Playstation was sold at a loss as well.

    13. Re:Abuse of power? by gowen · · Score: 1
      If they want to sell any of them, they're FORCED to compete with the prices of the other consoles, or nobody will buy one.
      If you can't sell your product at a profit, you're in the wrong business (especially if it's something as magnificently non-essential as a freaking games console).
      Time to fold up your trestle table and go home.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    14. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How is anyone "forcing" Microsoft to do anything?"

      I'm starting to think that few people commenting on Slashdot have any idea how economics works.

      Playstation 2 drops price, GameCube drops price, suddenly XBOX is the expensive guy on the block. MS was forced to drop price to keep up. It's called competition.

      I can't wait to hear the next illogical argument. "well MS didn't have to drop their price. They just did it because they want to piss people off!"

    15. Re:Abuse of power? by Quarters · · Score: 2

      If you can't sell your product at a profit, you're in the wrong business (especially if it's something as magnificently non-essential as a freaking games console).
      Time to fold up your trestle table and go home.


      Right...and the fact that Nintendo has run with this business strategy for close to 25 years now and has more $ in the bank than you could ever imagine is just a fluke?

    16. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. You're referring to what people call the "razor blade" business model, and it's perfectly legitimate. But should the LAW come in and close down other businesses which might conflict with someone's razor blade business? Sorry, but no. What's good for GM is good for America, right?

    17. Re:Abuse of power? by tshak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should reevaluate your stance. Many objectively (read: w/o blind MS hate) agree that the XBox is the most powerful system and the most elegant to develop for. It was most definitely not poorly engineered.

      The PS2 lost money initially and so did the Gamecube. Granted, the XBox is losing money a littler longer then the other two, but it's still very typical for the industry.

      But none of this really matters. The fundamental point is that money for console systems has always been made off the royalties off the games, not the hardware. Sony is just as aggressive against piracy devices as MS is.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    18. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      No, it's not a fluke. What's your point exactly? We shouldn't be closing up businesses and restricting people's freedom just because it conflicts with somebody's business model.

    19. Re:Abuse of power? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think they have been pretty aggressive about it as well. There have been stories on here about it.

    20. Re:Abuse of power? by gowen · · Score: 1

      And yet they manage to make a profit (on games) without feeling the need to throw their weight around and beat up upon (locally) legitimate traders...

      And besides, I can imagine quite a bit...

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    21. Re:Abuse of power? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Regardless of whether or not other companies sell their consoles at a loss, Nintendo has always tried to set a profitable price point for their consoles.

    22. Re:Abuse of power? by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Nintendo had customs agents going into packages from known companies that sold flash card kits. These packages where then barred from entering the US. The same thing happened with the Dreamcast Coder cable. You can use it to upload and run code on your DC without burning a CD; however, it can also be used to rip games.

    23. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      So...we have to close up businesses because they might put another company out of business? Yeah, MS was forced, so to speak, to drop their prices. If it's not working out for them, exit the market. You use *descriptive* economics as a sort of moral guide. You're like those people who justify anything with "evolution". "Hey, why should we save endangered species, they're dying out because they can't survive. That's evolution, survival of the fittest".

      You seem to have the most elementary understanding of economics, and not only is your understanding of it elementary, you use it in a vacuum. Grow up.

    24. Re:Abuse of power? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      First, how do you _know_ it's frivolous? You've seen all the documents?

      I'm not saying that it's not, for sure, but it's possible that L-S used MS' BIOS code or something else proprietary, and that is why this lawsuit seems to be sticking. If that's the case, it was a dumb move on their part.

    25. Re:Abuse of power? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      Pardon me sir but have no clue what engineering is. its not about the biggest building, fastest car, best gaming system. Engineering is about gathering your requirements, and implimentg them in a cost efficent, yet powerful manner. If I design a game system that hase a PPU which is much higher than the competition I have done a piss poor job of engineering it. My 2,500 dollar computer is more powerful than the xbox but if it were designed as a gaming system it would be a piss poor design because of its cost.

      the reason XBox is losing more money for longer than PS2 is because PS2 was better engineered to fulfil the market requirements as a reasonable cost.

      --
    26. Re:Abuse of power? by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      that is exactly the business model that sony nintendo and gillette use. not to mention, every printer company on the face of the earth.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    27. Re:Abuse of power? by Rupert · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft can't sell the XBox at a profit, it should either lower its costs or not sell it at all. Using legal intimidation to support a flawed business model, particularly one that relies on running at a loss until the competition leaves the market, is reprehensible.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    28. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I haven't seen Nintendo screaming and yelling cuz of flash carts..

      In fact the whole reason why I bought my GBA was because I wanted to program it.."


      I believe the product was called 'Flash Linker', and yes Nintendo was very aggressive about getting it shut down.

      Sony's done similar stuff against mod chips.

      Frankly, the only reason this is of interest to Slashdot is because it's bent out of shape until it looks like MS is being an aggressive bully.

    29. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "But should the LAW come in and close down other businesses which might conflict with someone's razor blade business?"

      Argument Rejected: Apples != Oranges.

    30. Re:Abuse of power? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      Inability to compete does not imply that someone is forcing something.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    31. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Care to explain your reasoning? I mean, that *is* what a forum like this one is for, isn't it?

      You listed Nintendo, Sony, and Gillette. I called them "razor blade businesses", referring to the business model, not necessarily the specific products they sell. Nintendo, Sony and Gillette have been very successful with this model. Good for them. Does this mean we should restrain trade in order to support those "razor blade businesses" that don't quite work out?

      Don't give me a half-assed answer this time.

    32. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm starting to think that few people commenting on Slashdot have any idea how economics works."

      I'm starting to think you don't know the definition of the word "force".

    33. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a MS fanboy...don't worry though. Jesus loves you.

    34. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Inability to compete does not imply that someone is forcing something."

      Really? So if I put a gun to your head and say "Give me your money or you die", then I'm not forcing you to give me your money?

      I mean you do have a choice there. It's not my fault that you don't have a bulletproof skull.

    35. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I'm starting to think you don't know the definition of the word "force"."

      So.. that's your whole debate? No response as to why you think I'm wrong? I can see why you posted anonymously. Chicken.

    36. Re:Abuse of power? by irix · · Score: 2

      Here's an economics lesson for you:

      We both sell widgets for $10, but mine only cost me $5 to manufacture, while yours cost you $9. I drop my price to $7. What do you do?

      If you are Microsoft and you have $billions in the bank, you eat the loss and drop your price to try and compete. But don't come crying to me that you are losing money hand over fist every time you sell a widget.

      Sorry, I don't have any sympathy for Micorosft here. Somebody might have "forced" them to drop their price, but nobody forced them to be stupid enough to manufacture a console more expensively than everyone else and then sell it with a game lineup that makes me yearn for my Atari 2600.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    37. Re:Abuse of power? by raygundan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      MS may have been forced to drop their price to keep up with their competition, but that's the way economics works, as you so bluntly point out.

      If you build a product that is more expensive than a similar one from a competitor, expect people to buy the cheaper one. If you can't make yours cheaper, don't expect regulation to help you make up the cost difference. There is no inherent right to make profit in a capitalist system-- if you can't get your production costs down as low as your competitors, you will be priced right out of the market. This happens all the time.

      Why should microsoft be able to sell things at a loss with profits ensured by law, while their competitors are capable of making a profit on the hardware even at lower price points? (Nintendo is making a profit on the gamecube at $150)

      But I digress. All of this is nearly irrelevant in the first place-- mod chips are no more illegal than guns. Just because they can be used illegally does not make them intrinsically illegal. (Unless they contain copyrighted code by MS!!) Whether or not MS has to lower their prices below cost to keep up with their competition's superior designs has no bearing on whether or not modchips are legal.

    38. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe they should have dreamed up a console that wasn't a bunch of expensive over-the-counter shit that wasn't going to get easier/cheaper for them to fab (CUZ THEY DON'T FAB IT THEMSELVES!!!).

      Maybe they should have tried an approach that leans more towards embedded systems, to keep the Box smaller and cheaper, instead of trying to put a PC in a box then spending money on media action and legal action to convince people otherwise.

      No matter what way you look at it, if MS sells me an X-Box for $300CDN then I can take that box, take it apart, put it together, smash it into a million pieces, use it as a paperweight or just generally do whatever the fuck I please with it so long as I don't violate MS's IP by doing something like posting a BIOS image or ROMS.

    39. Re:Abuse of power? by JWW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But will you change your tune in the future when Microsoft shuts down all the Palladium mod chip manufacuters and you can no longer run Linux on a new PC.

      Look at this current action by Microsoft. The XBox is the test system for a secure PC that only runs Microsoft code.

      Palladium's only reason for existince (I believe) is to be used to prevent any OS (or application for that matter) to not run without Microsofts consent. It will undoubtedly be the most evil thing Microsoft will ever do and failure to respond to issues like this will only help them achieve there goals.

      Tell everyone you know not to buy an XBox.

      The real difference here between MS and the other console manufacturers is that Microsoft is hellbent on bringing this kind of crap to your PC. Palladium must fail.

    40. Re:Abuse of power? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      And if you believe his argument, you MUST accept that the MS monopoly "forced" OEMs to have exclusive contracts with MS.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    41. Re:Abuse of power? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >So if I put a gun to your head and say "Give me your money or you die", then I'm not forcing you to give me your money?

      Cool, that takes game consoles to a whole new level.

      Unfortunately, about the worst a game console could do to you is crush your toes (assuming you drop an X-Box on them).

      Go look up the legal definition of extortion before you try to use it as an example again.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    42. Re:Abuse of power? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >MS was forced to drop price to keep up. It's called competition.

      It's called "If you can't compete, you find another business".

      Or at least that's what it used to be called.

      I've said it before, I'll say it again: If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    43. Re:Abuse of power? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      So who's holding the proverbial gun to Microsoft's proverbial head?

      It's a trick question - the answer is Bill Gates, because after having so much money, MS's strategy is to try (knock down the competition a little), lose, try (knock down the competition a little), lose, try (knock down the competition a little), lose...

      Eventually they knock down the competition enough to win.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    44. Re:Abuse of power? by scot4875 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know that I'd call DirectX programming elegant. It's very functional, but not elegant.

      And no, it's not poorly engineered. It's not well engineered either. It's a PC. It works for what they needed it to do.

      The PS2 is well-engineered, despite being difficult to program. The Gamecube is a feat of engineering. A suffuciently powerful, cheap to produce, tiny package that plays good games.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    45. Re:Abuse of power? by Zamfir · · Score: 1

      what a bunch of alarmist anti-ms zealots! i wonder how many people who are pro-P2P are crying fould because MS got a mod chip distributor out of business. when it comes to this sort of thing, there is nothing about different about MS than nintendo, or sony or RIAA. you are all a bunch of sheep!

    46. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of well-reasoned responses to your post. I'm just here to call you an ass. Ass.

    47. Re:Abuse of power? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      the XBox is losing money a littler longer then the other two, but it's still very typical for the industry.


      do you have any proof of this? other than the industry-types who make this assertion to make people buying the consoles in the first place feel like they are getting a good deal? I dont believe - not for a second - that all three are taking a loss on their consoles. Not for a goddamn second.

    48. Re:Abuse of power? by danny256 · · Score: 1

      If I design a game system that hase a PPU which is much higher than the competition I have done a piss poor job of engineering it.

      You're a fucking idiot.
      I don't mean to bitch about spelling or anything, but you spelled HAS wrong, are you 5 years old or what? Although if you are actually an engineer as your post implies then I guess that explains a lot about the spelling and grammer.

    49. Re:Abuse of power? by bludstone · · Score: 1

      The dreamcast and the xbox are the only consoles ever to be sold at a loss. Sony and Nintendo are nothing short of brilliant when it comes to the videogame industry.. they have to be.

      --

      no .sig
    50. Re:Abuse of power? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Do you really feel that Nintendo being an aggressive bully would justify MS doing the same?

      Mind you, I don't remember the issue. I can't tell whether your report matches what was reported as news. But it wouldn't justify anything either way. An abusive bully doesn't cease to be an abusive bully merely because others act the same way.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    51. Re:Abuse of power? by cheezedawg · · Score: 2

      But will you change your tune in the future when Microsoft shuts down all the Palladium mod chip manufacuters and you can no longer run Linux on a new PC.

      You will always be able to run Linux on a PC with Palladium hardware- that was one of the design requirements.

      The XBox is the test system for a secure PC that only runs Microsoft code.

      No, the goal of Palladium is to provide a hardware backed secure method for an application to store data- it does not include any method to prevent an application from running.

      Palladium's only reason for existince (I believe) is to be used to prevent any OS (or application for that matter) to not run without Microsofts consent.

      Considering it isn't even possible for Palladium to prevent anything from running, your beliefs are incorrect.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    52. Re:Abuse of power? by ELiTeUI · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no shit.

      Gillette might sell me the razor with one blade for $4, and then count on me buying 5-packs of blades for $10. If another large company, say, Walgreens, makes 'generic' blades that are compatible with Gillette razor-handles, and sells them cheaper (say $4 a 5-pack), that does not open Walgreens up to a lawsuit from Gillette.

      Additionally, if i took my Gillette razor-handle that i bought, and modified it to work with schick razor blades, that does not open me up to a lawsuit from Gillette.

      This whole fucking thing is about greed, and guaranteeing how much of YOUR money Microsoft gets. I'm sorry, but if you can't maintain game sales on quality of games ALONE (assuming you trust the masses to do the right thing and buy your game, which is just about the only way that this OLD ASS, OUTDATED business model is EVER going to survive), then you need some serious help.

      ELiTeUI out.

    53. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Eventually they knock down the competition enough to win."

      And mod chips are competition? Nope. They are 100% non-competitive. As a matter of fact, mod chips make people wantXBOXes.

      They are circumvention devices. You might have thought about that if this article were about Sony and not Microsoft.

    54. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Cliches don't really solve problems.

    55. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Redundant

      "There are plenty of well-reasoned responses to your post. I'm just here to call you an ass. Ass."

      I dare you to call me an ass with your registerred nick. Or are you chicken? Chicken.

    56. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me sir, but you don't seem to grasp the difference between building to a specification and building to a price.

      X-Box is built to a specification. The intention, no doubt, being to capture market share from less well specified products in the same price band.

      There's nothing new in this tactic.

      To your mind, the cheapest to produce design is the best. Well, sometimes it is, but more often it's not.

      IAAE (I am an engineer).

    57. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That my friend is one of the Great Myths of Console hardware. Hardware IS NEVER EVER Sold for a loss. Sega dabbled in it with the dreamcast, and look where they ended up. Sony made money on every single PS2 hardware unit they ever sold. Nintendo has NEVER sold any piece of hardware at a loss. Sony spent a lot of money 'designing' the PS2, however, so for the first year every dollar of profit from their entire gaming unit was going into making up for the cost of designing the PS2, and even that wasn't enough, but never the less, they did not ever sell the PS2 console at a loss per unit. Microsft did, but really the Xbox a PC lite, so they didn't have huge development costs. Dreamcast had development costs, but sega was forced to sell them at a loss to compete and they couldn't afford to do so anymore.

    58. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Do you really feel that Nintendo being an aggressive bully would justify MS doing the same?"

      No, that's not what I was saying. What I was saying was that people are bitching about it only because it's about MS this time around. Nintendo does it, no problem. Sony does it, no problem. Microsoft does it, and suddenly it's wrong.

      You all need an attitude adjustment. To you guys, this isn't about right or wrong, it's about nailing MS. Frankly, I think debates like that have no substance. This thread has generated nearly 40 replies, and most of them are attacks at me, as opposed to having alternative points of view with any substantial relevance.

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again: If Slashdot goes into an uproar every time MS makes a headline, then nobody will ever listen to Slashdot when MS really does something rotten. "oh, it's just Slashdot, they hate EVERYTHING Microsoft does." It'd be kind of like "The Boy Who Cried Wolf".

    59. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "You're like those people who justify anything with "evolution". "Hey, why should we save endangered species, they're dying out because they can't survive. That's evolution, survival of the fittest"."

      You use irrelevant metaphors to prove me wrong, and I need to grow up? What's the matter, don't you have any real substance to your debate? Need to sugar-coat it a bit? heh.

      Sorry, your comments will not cause me to lose any sleep. Good day, sir. :)

    60. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but if you made your 'cheap blades' by signing a deal with Gillette to license and produce blades for them, acquiring the equipment to produce the blades from them, then broke the deal and started selling the blades yourself, they'd rightly sue and shut you down.

      The situation here is similar. The mod chips being sold were using Microsoft code that was licensed for the purpose of developing games that would work with the Xbox, not producing rip-offs of the Xbox ROMs. They were selling stolen code and (presumably) got shut down for it.

      The crucial point to understand is that if their chips had been clean-room clones without the copy-protection stuff, and not stolen/modified code, they wouldn't have been doing anything illegal; any more than a blade-maker legally copying a Gillette blade. It's just that legally cloning complex software is a lot more difficult than legally cloning a little piece of plastic and metal.

    61. Re:Abuse of power? by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      You aren't much better yourself; what possessed you to go and try to label hundreds of thousands of people(hundreds in this article alone)?

      Personally, I see P2P as a useful tool, especially for situations such as the last week, where traditional FTP sites were all too bogged down to get either Mandrake 9.0 or RedHat 8.0(I pity the fools who tried hosting both!!!!). There are plenty of people using Kazaa-kin for pirating music, software, movies, TV shows, and so on though. The fact that there isn't a legitimate way to do things like get streaming TV stations over the internet(or better, just download episodes of TV shows for viewing at your leisure, the real reason so many people like using things like kazaa for downloading TV shows) only makes the situation worse. It's going to be one hell of a hard sell to convince the public that one of the coolest and most useful applications of the computer age should be ignored because it's immoral, especially when there's no other way of doing things. Instead of making a copy of a movie right now, I have the option to rent it. If I want to get it off the internet, I have one option. The "outdated business models" arguement has become irritatingly cliched, and often used when it doesn't apply(like in this case, where it's just one company who likes to have it's customers by the balls -- the internet has nothing to do with it; the console industry is the same today as it was a decade ago with the cardridge readers for SNES), but it still holds some water when you consider that the entertainment industry in general(there are some exceptions, such as Valve software, and their steam concept) is trying to destroy and silence a popular new medium.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    62. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, no can do. You might find out who I am, and come over to my house. But that's okay, because my dad could beat up your dad.

    63. Re:Abuse of power? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Cliches don't really solve problems.

      Isn't that a cliche in and of itself?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    64. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Isn't that a cliche in and of itself?"

      Does it matter? I wasn't solving your problem.

    65. Re:Abuse of power? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I wasn't solving your problem.

      Was I solving yours? :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    66. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Was I solving yours? :-)"

      Are you solving it now? :D

    67. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you have never seen a typo noodle dick?

    68. Re:Abuse of power? by God!+Awful · · Score: 2


      But I digress. All of this is nearly irrelevant in the first place-- mod chips are no more illegal than guns. Just because they can be used illegally does not make them intrinsically illegal.

      Unlicensed guns are illegal. If you would like Microsoft and Sony to get started on the national mod chip registration database, I'm sure they could oblige.

      -a
      If kiddie pr0n was illegal, only criminals would have kiddie pr0n.

    69. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again: If Slashdot goes into an uproar every time MS makes a headline, then nobody will ever listen to Slashdot when MS really does something rotten. "oh, it's just Slashdot, they hate EVERYTHING Microsoft does." It'd be kind of like "The Boy Who Cried Wolf".

      I already have the "oh its just slashdot" attitude when reading now. There is just too much anti-MS to think the posts are objective and credible anymore.

      How can a more intelligent forum of critical thinkers throw out logic and be so...emotionally biased?

    70. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "How can a more intelligent forum of critical thinkers throw out logic and be so...emotionally biased?"

      Heh. These people should turn to the Vulcan way of life. Not only would they be more intelligent and logical, they'd also have sex waaaay more often!

    71. Re:Abuse of power? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Don't give me a half-assed answer this time.
      "


      Did you consider not giving him a half-assed question? Not only is your debate style "Take it to an illogical extreme!", but you also use an entirely different industry as a model.

      Ever hear of something called copyright? The mod chips bypass copy protection schemes, that's what MS is miffed about. It has nothing to do with trying to run Linux on the stupid machines.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    72. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Care to explain your reasoning? I mean, that *is* what a forum like this one is for, isn't it?"

      No I don't care to. You're not going to listen to me. No matter what I say, you're going to disregard it with a metaphor that may sound like it fits, but ultimately has no relevance at all.

      Prove to me that you'll actually try to understand my point (Note: understand != agree) and I'll give you the response you want. Otherwise, FUCK OFF.

    73. Re:Abuse of power? by mabinogi · · Score: 2

      Sony do not sell at a loss, and Nintendo never did either, untill the Game Cube

      Sega started that with the Saturn, and then the Dreamcast.

      Looks like they left the console buisness.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    74. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Look at this current action by Microsoft. The XBox is the test system for a secure PC that only runs Microsoft code."

      The XBOX is a game machine. Let me say it again, XBOX is a game machine. It is a machine that plays games. It does nothing but play games, and optionally playback movies. (Just like a Playstation 2...)

      It cannot:

      1.) Browse the web
      2.) Word Processing
      3.) Get email
      4.) Post on Slashdot ... etc.

      Could it? Maybe. Is anybody going to use it for that? Well it's funny you should mention that, those mod-chips allow Linux to be installed. Suddenly all these things can happen!

      You idiots are trying to turn it into a PC! MS is trying to keep it a game machine. Seems to fly right in the face of your non-existent point, doesn't it?

    75. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "but should the LAW come in and close down other businesses which might conflict with someone's razor blade business? "

      The razor blade business is nothing like the game industry, mainly because of the way copyright is involved. The government has upheld that a console maker can tightly control who publishes for what system. Go look up the lawsuit between Tengen and Nintendo back in the late 80's. Tengen made it's own 'Nintendo Compatible' cartridge and published a game with it. Nintendo sued and won. Ever since, you have to be licensed with the console manufacturer to produce games.

      The mod chips make it possible to copy games (violating DMCA, sadly) and to play non-licensed software. Like it or hate it, MS is doing exactly what the law says it can do. You can thank Nintendo, Sony, and Sega for putting that into place. Ever notice that all Playstation CD's are black? It's because only Sony produces them. Think about it.

      So no, despite your 'oh so proud' moderation on the topic, you are wrong. Too bad you so anti-MS that you can't see that. I bet you won't even try to understand my point.

    76. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      The first sale doctrine forbids such "contracts" tho. In the beginning of the 20th Century, books came with EULA type contracts, but Congress declared them invalid. By turning a sale into a "contract" or an "agreement" you are distorting the market. Regardless of your analogies, then end result is the same: a less efficient and inherently unfair market.

    77. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I dont believe - not for a second - that all three are taking a loss on their consoles. Not for a goddamn second."

      I don't believe it.. I won't believe it.. you can't make me believe it! NOOOOO!!!!!

      Yes, the Playstation 2 was sold at a loss, so was the original Playstation. It's actually very common. The game company tries to squeeze just a little more interesting crap into a system, but they eat the cost of it. Eventually they make up for it with the sale of games.

      Nintendo's strategy is a little different "Make the design as effecient as possible". They don't go for frills.

    78. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've heard of copyright. Ever heard of patents? Yes, patents are, or can be, used by companies like gillette as an indirect way of preventing people from selling cartridge clones. Microsoft's use of copyright in this scenario is not really about copyright at all, it's about controlling their hardware. Think about what copyright is for. It's not about controlling what people do with hardware that you sell them, at least it wasn't supposed to be.

      The mod chips bypass copy protection schemes, that's what MS is miffed about.

      Of course that's what they're miffed about. Does microsoft being miffed require that the law come in and fix things for them? I don't think it matters what Microsoft is miffed about. Allowing the market to be controlled in such a manner, even if it's a good thing in this limited example, ALWAYS leads to abuse and inefficiency and unfairness in the market.

      Seriously, what good would it do to allow Microsoft to get what they want here?

      By the way, I have an Xbox, and I think it's great, and I've defended it many times before. People call it bloated and sloppily engineered and just a big mess. All I know is I like it, it's better than the other consoles, etc. etc. So I didn't care that they were selling it at a loss, as opposed to the other consoles. But if the business model isn't working out for them, try something else. Or try making the console more secure. Are we going to set ugly legal precedents just so Microsoft can save a few dollars by using the law to bully people instead of making it more secure?

      I really haven't been taking things to logical extremes (maybe I have, I suppose I tend to do that sometimes, but give me examples). You can ask me if I've ever heard of copyright, but you're relying on something that most people consider necessary in general (copyright) to justify this specific example. Yes, I've heard of copyright. And I think trying to pursue this through copyright law would be an abuse of copyright, and a disrespect to its original intentions.

      It's amazing what lengths we sometimes go to to avoid competition, just because we're afraid someone might go out of business. I think much more likely is that consumers would win out.

    79. Re:Abuse of power? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Whoa, calm down. I'll try to tone down on the rhetoric. I'll try to be open minded and not take anything for granted in my reply. But I just want to explain that in the past I thought very much like you do, so I really do understand exactly what you're saying and what you mean. Maybe I'm just taking too many things for granted and not explaining myself properly. When I say I'm taking things for granted, I mean I might be saying things that I've discovered are true, and now I take it for granted that it's true, so I don't see that I need to explain it. Of course, taking things for granted like that might also compromise my reasoning. Whatever, I'll try to give an intellectually honest reply, and to be thorough. If you want, email me. I want to pursue this.

    80. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar, professor.

    81. Re:Abuse of power? by danny256 · · Score: 1

      That's not as bad as hase.

    82. Re:Abuse of power? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      Yea because its not like there is an 'e' key anywhere near the 's', oh wait there is..

      --
    83. Re:Abuse of power? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      I never said the cheapest was the best, if you build to a specification which is so high in price you cannot compete in the market you design is worthless.

      This is not **TOTALLY** an engineering failure, I am sure some bean counter is at fault as well. The xbox is overdesigned as a gaming console, hence they are losing much more money per unit than anybody else in the market. This is not a good design.

      When I say its bad engineering I am talking about the organisations engineering process not the individule engineers designing a board. The process clearly failed, you have created a product which if sold at a reasonable loss could not compete in the market.

      To my mind the best product is the one which best fits the use it was designed for, not one which is so overdesigned it can not survive at a competative price. Innovation is not throwing a ton of money at a problem, its finding a way to do it in an affordable manner.

      Take a Sports car, if you are designing for the rich its ok to build out a very very expensive spec, but you have to charge for it. You can build a BMW and expect it to compete with a Dodge Neon at price.

      IEEE, HKN (I to am an Engineer)..

      --
    84. Re:Abuse of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a cock sucking ass licker, i hope you die

    85. Re:Abuse of power? by tshak · · Score: 2

      Open up the box again. It may use x86 components but come on. What PC has a unified memory architecure?

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    86. Re:Abuse of power? by tshak · · Score: 2

      Pardon me sir but have no clue what engineering is.

      Welcome to the real world. This is not acadamia purist BS. Noone said it's just about being the fastest, but it's the fastest, easiest to develop for amonth the 3 consoles (GC coming in a close second), and it's cost of production is theoretically decreasing quickly because of the use of standard parts.

      The design of the XBox is in it's first generation, but it's a very good design. Thank you for insulting my intelligence though.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    87. Re:Abuse of power? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      There is a difference between not knowing what Engineering is and not being intelligent. I did not mean to insult you personally, sorry. But do not be so insecure about what others say, and do not assume because someone disagrees with you they are insulting you.

      I work in the real world, In corporate America. I am up to my eyes in the real world so dont presume I am some 1st year Engineering student who thinks they know it all. I am not privy the the ppu cost of the X-Box so it could be coming down in price, I dont really know, But I do know it still cost at most retaillors about 269 dollars, where as you can get a PS2 for about 200$ (Both at BJ's price club).

      As you have used the word theoretically decreasing I am assuming that you are also not privy to the ppu of the xbox either. My point is that for its use it is a piss poor design, and it were any other company but one with the pockets of MS I would already be a collectors item as most companines would (and should) not tolerate the losses it has had to absorb. By the time the X-Box is cash+, sony and Nintendo will be out with new systems that make X-Box look average, and then MS will have to build a newer better and again much more expensive one.

      --
  3. Score one for Tha Man by EvilAlien · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wonder if this is viewed as a rightful exercising of intellectual property rights or more fodder for anti-trust from the point of view of the Justice Department?

    Mod chips, legal issues aside, are one of the "value adds" of the console market. Cracking down on this will drive Microsofts target audience away. Perhaps they've shot themselves in the foot with this.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    1. Re:Score one for Tha Man by evilpenguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a feeling this would depend on whether you are talking about the Clinton DoJ or the Bush the Younger DoJ. I think the present administration is generally less keen on the Sherman Act than the previous administration.

      I think Microsoft's recent increase in agression is a sign that they think so too.

      I leave it up to you whether that is a good thing or not.

    2. Re:Score one for Tha Man by bberg · · Score: 1

      Mod chips, legal issues aside, are one of the "value adds" of the console market.

      I agree with you. Although, in most cases these companies (MS,Sony,Nintendo) take a loss on the consoles and make all of their money on game sales. So I doubt they were thinking of X-box Linux hobbyists when they were suing these guys, they were thinking of people playing copied games.

    3. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Mod chips, legal issues aside, are one of the "value adds" of the console market... Perhaps they've shot themselves in the foot with this."

      I'd agree with this comment except MS needs to sell 4 games to make up for the loss they take on each system. If people buy XBOXes but don't buy games for them (i.e. they buy them to install Linux on so they can tap tap tap at it all day), then MS doesn't want their business. They lose.

      If MS believed that purchase of an XBOX because it has a mod chip would also mean sales of games, I'm sure they'd go for it. I can certainly understand their concern though, since their lineup of games isn't very strong right now.

      In other words, there isn't much value in the games today, but they need to move the games in order for this whole venture to be worthwhile.

    4. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in all honesty, what percentage of Xbox users will mod ther Xbox? probably somewhere around 5%, and that's being generous.

      seeing that mod chips in the past have allowed PS1 users to play illegally copied games, i doubt that microsoft will shed a tear over all the business they might lose. they won't make any money off any illegally copied games anyway, so why should they care?

    5. Re:Score one for Tha Man by cybrthng · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mod chips are not "Value adds".

      Value adds are the features inherant to the system as designed. It just so happens that the xbox is a very "value added" system inherantly.

      DVD, 5.1 Dolby Digital, Hard Disk, 4 Controllers, Ethernet, Fast Video, 64 megs of ram, HDTV support and many other XBOX features give it VALUE over other competing products and make it wanted and valued by many.

      The devaluation is at the software and game level. Is Developer X going to spend 5 million making a game that can be pirated with ease because someone can goto lik-sang.com and get a modchip? NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo

      Microsoft is protecting the value of the millions of units sold. Microsoft is protecting the rights of the licensees, distributors, developers and contributors of the xbox.

      What is the value of hacking a system to use it for purposes of which it isn't intended or designed for and why can't microsoft legally fight to protect its intended and protected interests?

      Even though i modded my dreamcast and could play pirated games, i didn't consider this a value add. For one, i couldn't read the japanese games and often times it wasn't worth the effort and for pirated games they were ripped, chunked, slow and missing features.

      After my experimentation with "mod chips" it just wasn't worth it, and personally i see the value in the xbox of being a superb platform to begin with so i'm anxiously waiting to buy the excellent games that will come out.

      As for liksang, i'm sure they were doing other things to get shutdown and i'm sure Sony, Sega and Nintendo have always wished they had to balls or $$$$ to do it themselves....

      it was the "value add" of the modchips and ripped DC games that ended the life of that console. (and the ps2.. but sega cited the loss of software sales because of rampant piracy and loss of developers because of rampant piracy to be a big factor)

    6. Re:Score one for Tha Man by fitsnips · · Score: 0

      Yea cause Sony is really hurting for money.

      >>As for liksang, i'm sure they were doing other >>things to get shutdown and i'm sure Sony, Sega and >>Nintendo have always wished they had to balls or >>$$$$ to do it themselves....

      --
      I am a republican not by choice, but rather by lack there of.
    7. Re:Score one for Tha Man by splume · · Score: 1

      Cracking down on this will drive Microsofts target audience away.

      Who do you consider MS's target market? Linux geeks who want to ruin the company by hacking the XBOX? I don't think MS considers those folks as being part of their target market.

      Their target market is the 13-30 year old male audience that enjoys playing video games. Preventing mod chips from getting to this market is not going to affect thier buying decision. These people buy the XBOX because they want to play games on it.

      To reiterate: The people MS are targeting don't give to shits about mod chips, they just want to play games.

      --

      Who is John Galt?
    8. Re:Score one for Tha Man by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      It may be 5% in the us, but Xbox is spending alot of time and money to launch in many countries over there that don't adhere to copyright laws.

      If microsoft can't enforce copyright laws then they can atleast restrict the ability to bypass the included protections.

      Japan Hong Kong and china arn't known for being copyright friendly and the Xbox has to deal with importation over there so any loss of revenue is more costly then what nintendo/sony faces. Nintendo chose to use an uncommon media and the playstation has a big enough us base that the percentage of modded vs unmodded isn't potentially as high.

    9. Re:Score one for Tha Man by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      "Is Developer X going to spend 5 million making a game that can be pirated with ease because someone can goto lik-sang.com and get a modchip? NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo"

      So why did Sony prevent developers from protecting against mod-chips then? Its trivial to discover if the PSX a game is running on has been chipped, but Sony apparantly told developers not to stop games from running. Why do you think that was?

    10. Re:Score one for Tha Man by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      Sony isn't hurting for money, they have plenty of slave labor help and government support they don't need to do anything.

      It sure is horrble microsoft is a bad bad anti-competitive company and Sony is great. Which is worse, pay a bit more for decent product or buy the fruits of underpaid, over worked people who live in missery for there entire existance to support our need to consume.

      Yeah, bad xbox. Protecting there value is a bad thing, be like sony, hire slave labor and work people to death so you can make profits in a tortuous way instead of a competitive capitalist way.

    11. Re:Score one for Tha Man by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

      "DVD, 5.1 Dolby Digital"

      Actually, the PS2 can play DVD and supports Dolby and DTS.

      It also supports DTS Interactive 5.1 surround sound. Which many audiophiles agree is much superior to dulby!

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    12. Re:Score one for Tha Man by clonebarkins · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What is the value of hacking a system to use it for purposes of which it isn't intended or designed for...

      To use it for purposes of which it isn't intended, obviously. Why ask the question when you have the answer in your question?

      ...and why can't microsoft legally fight to protect its intended and protected interests?

      Because once they sell you the product, they have no legal rights to it anymore. BTW, what's a "protected" interest? That means nothing to me. I'm currently using an old Western Digital hard drive as a doorstop -- does that mean WD has the right to come and force me legally to not use their product in this unintended way?

      --

      "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

    13. Re:Score one for Tha Man by TrIaX · · Score: 1

      "What is the value of hacking a system to use it for purposes of which it isn't intended or designed for and why can't microsoft legally fight to protect its intended and protected interests?"

      I have alot of stuff that I am using in ways that they were not originally intented, and because of they, those items hold a higher value TO ME.

      "Value Add" is in the eye of the beholder. To me, being able to run Linux on an XBox as a cheap whatever the hell I decide to use it for is a "Value Add" to me. It may not be to you, it may not be to Microsoft, but it is to me.

      Even though i modded my dreamcast and could play pirated games, i didn't consider this a value add. For one, i couldn't read the japanese games and often times it wasn't worth the effort and for pirated games they were ripped, chunked, slow and missing features.

      Ahh, the jump to piracy. First off, if you modded your dreamcast to play pirated games, you're a fool, because Dreamcast rips are either self-booting, or you burn a boot CD for it.

      Secondly, piracy is not the only reason to mod a console, and it wasn't the reason I modded my playstation 1. I needed that mod chip, but I don't have any pirated games, just imports. And just because you don't understand the Japanese doesn't mean it's completely useless to the rest of the planet.

      So, to summarize, you did some stuff, didn't like it, and the rest of the world must now forgo it because you say so, and can't see the use of it? Um, Ok. Thanks, please drive through.

      BTW, you mention the PS2 in the context of a dead console.. HUH? Dead? What? Excuse me? Please, stop smoking the MS Crackpipe.

    14. Re:Score one for Tha Man by !ramirez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just because you're a happy user, content to use your Xbox in whatever way Microsoft sees fit for you to do so, doesn't mean that everyone else on the planet shares your views. If I buy an Xbox, take it home, and decide to do something else with the equipment, that's my right, and my choice. As long as I am not unduly and tortiously interfering with the rights of others (people, not corporations), Microsoft has no recourse, period, end of story.

      Selling Xbox mod chips is *exactly* like having a set of lockpicking equipment. Locks are meant to keep people out of areas they don't belong in; same goes for the 'security hardware' on the Xbox. You don't see the 5-0 arresting those guys that come and get your keys out of your locked car, do you?

      Microsoft basically is using it's influence to crush out of existence what they don't like. Gee, who'd have thought they'd do that.

    15. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Amanset · · Score: 2

      They did stop them from working. Why do you think the most recent Playstation mod chips are known as "stealth" chips? They had to hide their existence to get round the blocks that had been added to the game.

    16. Re:Score one for Tha Man by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you modded your dreamcast you totally wasted your time--the thing could play ISOs out of the box.

      If you thing Sony and Nintendo didn't have the cash to shutdown Lik-Sang, well, there's a second reason for me to think you're an idiot. They didn't shutdown Lik-Sang because they realized people don't like soldering crap to their expensive consoles, and there really wasn't a big effect on piracy here. Microsoft just went after them because they're obstinate bastards who want to defeat the linux xbox hackers at all cost. Both the hackers and Microsoft are motivated by ideology--linux on Xbox is without value to hackers and without cost to Microsoft--hell, Sony even sells linux kits to encourage people to develop ps2 development skills.

      Yeah, modchips sure ruined the life of PS2 and PS1 ... probably the most successful consoles ever.

      Bottom line, the hardware belongs to however buys it, not whoever sells it. That's what "buying stuff" means.

    17. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I love your "I don't use it so it should be illegal" attitude. Especially this:

      For one, i couldn't read the japanese games and often times it wasn't worth the effort

      Well, guess what, I can't read Japanese either, but I have enjoyed many games from that country on my modded PS2 such as Sexy Parodius, Twinbee Deluxe Pack, Salamander Deluxe Pack, Gradius Gaiden. I also just happened to purchase Ikaruga for my Dreamcast. These are all shooters - and there is no language barrier for pure twitch action like that.

      Konami's games have always been popular here, but we didn't get any of those. So I adapted my system so that it would do what I wanted it to do. I see no harm in that, and there is not a thing about it that breaks any law aside from (possibly) the DMCA additions to US Copyright Law.

      You know why people have to import? Because the console manufacturers maintain a tight reign on what is published on their console. They are able to do so because it is nigh impossible to create working distributable software without their permission, and even if you could, you could possibly be in violation of patents or sued under the DMCA (for bypassing methods of protection).

      What it boils down to is that certain companies are not allowed to translate their games onto U.S. systems, even if they are willing to spend the money, because the hardware manufacturer is afraid that that title will make their system look bad. That's bullshit. Take a look at the PS2 as a great example - modchips appeared within a small number of months of the console's release allowing pirate games to be played, but NO ONE made a chip allowing imports until this year! It was a much more difficult process... Now why is that?

      I want to play the games I want to play. If I am not able to do so, I will pass the console by, plain and simple.

    18. Re:Score one for Tha Man by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that, cheers. How long has there been protection against them? I remember talking to a PSX developer about this around 5 years ago!

    19. Re:Score one for Tha Man by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Mod chips are not "Value adds".

      Value adds are the features inherant to the system as designed. It just so happens that the xbox is a very "value added" system inherantly.

      DVD, 5.1 Dolby Digital, Hard Disk, 4 Controllers, Ethernet, Fast Video, 64 megs of ram, HDTV support and many other XBOX features give it VALUE over other competing products and make it wanted and valued by many.


      I'd disagree. I bought the brand of DVD player I own because I knew I could easily modify it to play DVDs from other regions. It wasn't intended, but it definitely added value for me.

      it was the "value add" of the modchips and ripped DC games that ended the life of that console.

      No. It was years of mismanagement and bad business decisions by Sega that ended the DC. Plus the public perception that it was DOA. (and before you label me some PS2 zealot, let me say I bought my DC on launch day, and I have probably 20-25 games for it, all store-bought. The DC was a great console for it's price and it's day.)

    20. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though i modded my dreamcast and could play pirated games, i didn't consider this a value add. For one, i couldn't read the japanese games...

      Well that's too bad for you, but there are thousands and thousands of other people who either 1) move around the world regularly and would like to be able to take some of their possessions with them and/or 2) know two or more languages and for whom there isn't a language barrier in playing imported games; don't overestimate the universality of your personal experiences.

      And I don't believe for a second that Sega failed because of piracy. PS1 piracy was always more rampant -- I never even knew anyone with a modded DC until after it was dead whereas I never knew anyone without a modded PS1 -- and Sony's marketing and coercion of publishers for the PS2 was too great.

    21. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Malc · · Score: 1

      Does the PS2 support DD and DTS for games, or is that just for the DVD playback? It seems to me that the XBox supports DD in games, and it can also output DTS for DVDs, but not in games.

    22. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Malc · · Score: 1

      Some people get a lot of pleasure out of hacking around with systems and using them for things they were never designed to. This is added value for them, and doesn't necessarily involve any piracy. Obviously this doesn't appeal to you though - fine, but why piss on other people's fire?

    23. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      I don't know how long for sure, but Strider 2 was protected. A friend of mine bought it and was unable to play it because of his chip. Had to use someone else's console :)

    24. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Wildcat+J · · Score: 2
      Yes, I recall that the Bouncer (gag... what a waste of $50...) on PS2 did use DTS in-game. Though, it might have been only in cutscenes, which were not not all pre-rendered.

      Also, the Gamecube "supports" surround sound in several games, like Super Mario Sunshine, although it hasn't worked for me (I haven't really messed with it).

      -J

    25. Re:Score one for Tha Man by truenoir · · Score: 1

      SSX: Tricky also had DTS sound (in game) and it was sweet...
      Gamecube only does Pro Logic II, as it has no digital out.

      Though one has to wonder, if you care that much about DVDs and have the surround system to use DTS, would you be using a console?
      Heck, most people I know with a PS2 (including myself) don't use it for DVDs because it can't switch layers correctly/read the second layer right, and so only works to watch part of a movie. I've yet to hear the same complaint with the XBox.

    26. Re:Score one for Tha Man by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      But why should it be the business of the public/government to ensure that Microsoft's, or Sony's or Nintendo's business model works out? All of what you're saying is true but so fucking what? Lots of ventures aren't worthwhile. Try something else next time.

      I can envision at least five different business models for the console gaming industry. I can very easily imagine a console created by the industry through COOPERATION, a machine that all the game developers would support. I play console games a lot, and I know it sounds sacrilegious (sp?) to console gamers, but if there were one unified market, instead of being fragmented into 3, there would be a lot more games selling.

      But on the other hand, a console built based on cooperation might not work out for a number of reasons. But that's not my problem. I'm sure they'd work it out. The cell phone industry in Europe is a perfect example of the kind of progress that can sometimes be made through cooperation, especially when compared to the cell phone industry in the US.

      You may not have imagination enough to imagine things being any different, but that doesn't mean they can't or wouldn't.

    27. Re:Score one for Tha Man by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

      The PS2 can output DTS 5.1 in some games. (The decoder uses about 2% of the cpu, so not all games implement it.

      The ones I am aware of are: SSX Tricky, NHL Ice Hockey and the soon to be released GTA4! There are probably many more.

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    28. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "But why should it be the business of the public/government to ensure that Microsoft's, or Sony's or Nintendo's business model works out? All of what you're saying is true but so fucking what? Lots of ventures aren't worthwhile. Try something else next time."

      What are you asking me for? That's not my decision to make. That is the way it is today and I cannot change that. I'm not a big fan of copy 'protection'.

      " I can very easily imagine a console created by the industry through COOPERATION, a machine that all the game developers would support"

      It's called a PC, and it's not a very successful model. Successful games on the PC are measured in hundreds of thousands. Successful games on game consoles are measured in millions.

      "You may not have imagination enough to imagine things being any different, but that doesn't mean they can't or wouldn't."

      Why are you taking pokes at me? Is it that hard to have a civilized debate? Do you really feel like you need to discredit me to 'win'?

    29. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Wildcat+J · · Score: 1
      Heck, most people I know with a PS2 (including myself) don't use it for DVDs because it can't switch layers correctly/read the second layer right, and so only works to watch part of a movie.
      I didn't know that. It's the only DVD player I have besides my iBook, though so I tend to use it and just bitch about it. This is getting off-topic, but I have my PS2 running S-video through good quality Sony receiver, to a good quality Sony TV (non-VVega, though), and often times when a movie fades to black, it will "drop signal" (I'm a software guy, not a hardware guy) and the TV will "mode switch". It's irritating as hell, and the only reason I point out the brand of all of my components is that they're all the same company and decent quality, but I still get this irritating behavior. It might work differently with composite video, but I've got a rat's nest of cables back there and it's not worth the trouble.

      -J

    30. Re:Score one for Tha Man by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      It's called a PC, and it's not a very successful model. Successful games on the PC are measured in hundreds of thousands. Successful games on game consoles are measured in millions.


      No, it's not called a PC. What I had in mind was a closed platform, one that can't be upgraded, and one that only has one hardware configuration.


      Why are you taking pokes at me? Is it that hard to have a civilized debate? Do you really feel like you need to discredit me to 'win'?


      You're right, I apologize, sincerely. I get a little worked up sometimes. Especially when you say stuff (if I remember correctly) like "oh another stupid slashdot post, god these people don't even understand basic economics!"

      You make it like you have a full understanding of everything, and that there is nothing outside the scope of your economic theory. But you're right, that was uncalled for; like I said, I get worked up sometimes.

    31. Re:Score one for Tha Man by mustangdavis · · Score: 1
      Microsoft just went after them because they're obstinate bastards who want to defeat the linux xbox hackers at all cost.

      You are right ... kinda ...

      The fact of the matter is that Xboxes are VERY cheap PCs!! Where else are you going to get a 800 MHz PC for $200??? For that matter, where are you going to get a couple hundred of these for that price? The answewr is no where!.

      What Microshaft really wants to do is stop Linux hackers from making Linux clusters with their Xboxes. The reasoning behind this, other than trying to "defeat linux", is because they are taking a loss on the Xbox console and are hoping to make up the difference in the price of the games and accessories that they sell for the console unit. BUt if you install Linux on their Xboxes, then you won't need their add-ons, thus decreasing their profit.

      Even though I'm not one to soder mod chips onto something that costs hundreds of dollars, I agree that the hardware belongs to the person buying it, not the company they purchased it from. Software is one thing, but this issue with hardware must be put to rest. If this keeps up, we won't be allowed to add rooms onto our houses or put NoS in our cars (that is, if you're crazy enough to use NoS)!
    32. Re:Score one for Tha Man by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      The devaluation is at the software and game level. Is Developer X going to spend 5 million making a game that can be pirated with ease because someone can goto lik-sang.com and get a modchip? NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo

      That sounds good in theory, but my experience with people who mod their current generation consoles is that they want to do things not normally allowed, such as play import games/DVDs, and run custom software that was written by random people on the internet. People just aren't pirating games for these new DVD based consoles like they used to for PSX, because it's just not practical, mod chip or no.

      If you think that the availability of mod chips is what is causing Xbox development to stagnate, you're seriously misguided. There are mod chips out there for the PS2 also, and the titles keep pouring out for the PS2. I think that the only reason somebody hasn't come out with a mod for the Gamecube yet is because Nintendo made it trivial to make the gamecube play import titles, so there's no incentive to make a mod chip.

    33. Re:Score one for Tha Man by geekoid · · Score: 2

      actually it is a value add. Console users have become acustomed to modding the units. It is a very small percentage of the users, but a very vocal small percentage. They have pissed off the kinds of users that will not take every opportunity to bad mouth them, and write negative articles.
      remember, value add applies to the consumer NOT the manufacturer.

      What is the value of hacking a system to use it for purposes of which it isn't intended or designed for and why can't microsoft legally fight to protect its intended and protected interests?

      it is a piece of hardware, like a car. If I want to drop a chevy engine into my ford, the car companies have no business making me stop from doinfg it, or making a mechanic not sell that service to there customers.
      If I wan't to buy an Xbox and use it as a door stop, that is my business not theres.

      The devaluation is at the software and game level. Is Developer X going to spend 5 million making a game that can be pirated with ease because someone can goto lik-sang.com and get a modchip? NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo
      YESSSssssssss.
      Games can now be easily copied, yet there is still a market. By your logic MS should never had started making software because it is easy to copy.

      "Sony, Sega and Nintendo have always wished they had to balls or $$$$ to do it themselves....
      "


      Ys, those poor cash strapped companies.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Score one for Tha Man by mrm677 · · Score: 2

      Cracking down on this will drive Microsofts target audience away. Perhaps they've shot themselves in the foot with this.

      I bet that 90%, or more, of the people of own an Xbox don't even know what a "mod chip" is.

    35. Re:Score one for Tha Man by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 2
      Is Developer X going to spend 5 million making a game that can be pirated with ease because someone can goto lik-sang.com and get a modchip?

      Yeah, that would be just like Developer X spending 5 million to develop a PC game that can be pirated with ease because someone can download a crack online. Or a music publishing company spending 5 million to contract a music star to record CDs that can the pirated with ease because some can easily download it online. Or a movie company spending 50 million to make a movie that can be pirated with ease because someone can easily purchase illegal DVD copies throughout the world.

      Oh, wait. All of these things happen. Repeatedly. And most of them are far easier and cheaper than purchasing a mod chip online and soldering it into your case.

      Dispite the ease of copyright infringement, these industries survive. It's not necessary to completely destroy copyright infringement, it's probably not even possible. (We work even harder at eliminating murder and illegal drugs, and yet both continue to happen.) Only fools think it's possible to perfectly protect content shipped to millions of people. Instead, work to minimize copyright infringment, prosecute the worst offenders of copyright infringment (people selling copied DVDs), and learn to live with the rest. When you have the effort of finding, purchasing, and installing a mod chip as a prerequisite, you're going to keep illegal copies to a bare minimum. The people willing to spend the effort to make the copies generally wouldn't have purchased a copy in the first place. Actual sales lost: minimal.

      (Please don't take this as a defense of making illegal copies. I'm against copyright infringment. I'm for purchasing video games. I'm arguing that the problem isn't so bad that publishers should run around screaming that the sky is falling.)

      What is the value of hacking a system to use it for purposes of which it isn't intended or designed for...?

      What is the value in installing various performance enhancing modifications on my car that it wasn't intended or designed for? The value of overclocking my processor to a speed it wasn't intended or designed for? Answer: it's none of the fscking manufacturer's concern. How I chose to treat the physical things I purchase is my business, not the manufacturers. I obviously find value in the modification, so clearly there is value for me. That's all that matters.

      Even though i modded my dreamcast and could play pirated games, i didn't consider this a value add. For one, i couldn't read the japanese games and often times it wasn't worth the effort and for pirated games they were ripped, chunked, slow and missing features.

      So it's of no value to you. That's fine. But a modchip in my PlayStation 2 is of value to me. I want access to the editions of Dance Dance Revolution released in Asia, the U.S. releases are inferior. Sure, I can't read the text, but I don't need to (I do just fine at the Korean DDR arcade machine next door). I'm not getting illegally copied games since I want to support the publisher, I'm interested in importing legally produced copies. So I don't need to worry about low quality illegal copies. I'd rather not have a second PS2 occupying space. This adds value for me. A similar set of reasons might create value for someone with an X-Box.

      it was the "value add" of the modchips and ripped DC games that ended the life of that console. (and the ps2.. but sega cited the loss of software sales because of rampant piracy and loss of developers because of rampant piracy to be a big factor)

      Well, gosh, if Sega said if was piracy, that must be the problem. The fact that they were competing with two very powerful, established competitors (Nintendo and Sony) certainly doesn't have anything to do with it. My many friends who all chose to wait for the PS2 instead of getting a Dreamcast clearly don't represent the typical population. There is certainly no chance that Sega misrepresented the reason they left the market to pin the blame on someone other than themselves. (I'm having problems finding articles were they actually blamed piracy... could you point me to a few?)

      I'm a Dreamcast owner. I love the machine and I mourn its passing.uy the argument that illegal copying killed the Dreamcast. The millions of people who said, "well, it looks nice, but I'm waiting for the PS2" killed the Dreamcast. I encouraged all of my friends to buy Dreamcasts. None did. Yet

    36. Re:Score one for Tha Man by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      I think the present administration is generally less keen on the Sherman Act than the previous administration.

      What, because it's Republican? Whose FTC let the megamergers of the 90's go through in the first place? Whose DoJ botched the handling of Microsoft to begin with?

      You may dislike Bush, hate his politics, whatever - this is an issue that has nothing to do with the Republicans (or, for that matter, the Democrats). Smart politicians don't stand in the way of letting businesses succeed. Lucky ones guess correctly when to step in and stop them. Bill Clinton is a very smart politician. He's not a terribly lucky one.

    37. Re:Score one for Tha Man by cybrthng · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Modded dreamcast that i bought from lik-sang to play imports not copies.

      Turns out the boot disk later replaced the need for the mod.

      And the mod chip for the PS1's do and still dent the PS1's profit margin for DEVELOPERS. I could care less how much Sony makes, that wasn't my point.


      Bottom line, the hardware belongs to however buys it, not whoever sells it. That's what "buying stuff" means.

      So in your opinion that means you can steal the software to, as that is the SOLE PURPOSE OF THE MOD-CHIP. They're note being sold as "to run linux" or anything other then invalidating the copy protections of the device you own.

    38. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you thing Sony and Nintendo didn't have the cash to shutdown Lik-Sang, well, there's a second reason for me to think you're an idiot. They didn't shutdown Lik-Sang because they realized people don't like soldering crap to their expensive consoles, and there really wasn't a big effect on piracy here. Microsoft just went after them because they're obstinate bastards who want to defeat the linux xbox hackers at all cost.

      The linux xbox hackers aren't even a blip on the radar, and you're fooling yourself if you think they are. The people Microsoft is after are the guys that mod their machines to pirate software.


      There are three reasons to mod an XBox: to get games for free, to defeat region control, to use Linux. In that order. People who mod their box to use linux are a minority. People who mod their box to use linux and pirate Xbox games are probably a minority. The majority: people who mod their xbox for the sole purpose of pirating games.

    39. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why I never will buy a console, and never have bought a console to date based on this. Meanwhile, I own 10+ computers of various ages.

      Loss leaders simply invite later protectionism. Companies that use them will end up using intellectual property claims or lobby for more direct industry tariff/duty approaches (this last has yet to happen realy in the console industry). While loss leaders are legal, they end up pinching away separate and should-be-legitimate business activities because the parent company will scream bloody murder that they are being robbed.

    40. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "No, it's not called a PC. What I had in mind was a closed platform, one that can't be upgraded, and one that only has one hardware configuration."

      You mean like the ill-fated Indrema, or the 3DO? Heh.

      "You're right, I apologize, sincerely. I get a little worked up sometimes. Especially when you say stuff (if I remember correctly) like "oh another stupid slashdot post, god these people don't even understand basic economics!"

      I stand by that comment. This thread has generated 36 replies so far, most of them are anti-MS bigotry. If I am wrong about you, then I apologize. If this topic were about Sony or Nintendo instead of MS, I wouldn't have all these stupid responses flooding my inbox.

    41. Re:Score one for Tha Man by krasni_bor · · Score: 1
      Microsoft just went after them because they're obstinate bastards who want to defeat the linux xbox hackers at all cost.

      Microsoft also has to prove that DRM works, and they can win an arms race against pirates, if they have more control over hardware. That is, if they want to sell Palladium.
    42. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Khaed · · Score: 1

      A good addition to this is to talk about cars or books. When you buy a car, you can fuck with the engine all you want. You can modify the speaker system to make it louder(pain in the ass when I'm asleep. don't do this). You can spraypaint your initials on the hood if you want.
      And with books, you can cut the cover off and superglue the cover to your windshield on the inside if you want. Don't see Del Rey or Tor suing people for selling scissors and glue. (Note: I've never cut a cover off of a book, but that doesn't mean it should be illegal.)

    43. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your sources for these "facts" would be what research?

      Until you have some hard numbers backing up your statements you are just blowing hot air like everyone else around here. The fact that you believe the majority of people that mod thier xbox will be for pirating games is simply your "opinion". You can't prove it and so your statment is pointless.

      The fine point of it is this. You own the hardware, you can do whatever the fuck you want with it. Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, etc have no right to control what you do with the box after it's in your hands bought and paid for. If you choose to do something illegal with it, that doesn't make the device illegal, it remains that your actions were illegal. You should be punished and not everyone.
      Stopping Lik-sang will not stop the people dedicated to pirating games any more than it will stop the people that want to use the Xbox for running Linux. What it does is make it a bit harder, and reduces the number of things that people that OWN the hardware can do with thier PROPERTY!

    44. Re:Score one for Tha Man by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      >> So in your opinion that means you can steal the software
      >> to, as that is the SOLE PURPOSE OF THE MOD-CHIP.

      I usually don't respond to trolls, but in this case I think it's worth pointing out that there are several original development projects for xbox (not just Linux) that the hardward is uniquely suited for. For instance, you can play divx at full speed full screen on a modded xbox.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    45. Re:Score one for Tha Man by aminorex · · Score: 1

      > anti-MS bigotry

      That's an oxymoron, son.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    46. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Maybe I'm just tired, but I totally didn't understand that comment.

    47. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where else are you going to get a 800 MHz PC for $200???

      WalMart. Where else?

    48. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (that is, if you're crazy enough to use NoS)!

      Not as crazy as you'd be to use NO2...

      Heeeheeheeheheheheheheeeee!
      *crash*
      HEEEEEEEEH HEHEHEHEEEHEHEEEE

    49. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "What, because it's Republican? "

      Why yes.

      "Whose FTC let the megamergers of the 90's go through in the first place?"

      Who did MS merge with?

      "Whose DoJ botched the handling of Microsoft to begin with?"

      At least they were going after them. As soon as Ashcroft took office he fell to his knees and started suckling on Bill Gates' member.

      "Smart politicians don't stand in the way of letting businesses succeed."

      Even if means harm to consumers or breaks the law?

      "Lucky ones guess correctly when to step in and stop them."

      The Clinton administration tried MS twice. First time MS simply ignored the rulings against them the second time is still in going on.

      "Bill Clinton is a very smart politician. He's not a terribly lucky one."

      Very true. Bush is getting away with things ten times as worse thanks to some terrorists. Sept 11 was the best thing that could even happen to the current administration.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    50. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Uh... XBoxes are made in plants in Mexico and China. So both companies support giving paying jobs to people in less countries with depressed economies.

      I take it you have never actually lived in the third world. Jobs at these types of factories are highly sought after. You see, bad as these jobs might be, the alternative is worse. You can call it slave labor if you want, but it's not. People that work in these factories are almost certainly very thankful to be employed. Low wages, long hours, and poor working conditions are simply what happens when the local job market is so depressed that workers don't have any bargaining power.

      If you really want to fix the problem the solution is to create more jobs in these areas. Unfortunately, the corruption of the local political machine usually makes that easier said than done.

    51. Re:Score one for Tha Man by roushi · · Score: 1

      The point to modding Dreamcasts wasn't to play pirated games, it was to play imported games. The modchips for dreamcast only defeated the region protection. To play pirated games, you needed to have a bootdisc, or the pirated game had to be self bootable.

      Without a mod chip, you needed to use a boot disc to play imported games, or you had to take apart your dreamcast and disconnect/reconnect the cd rom cable a few times, which was also a pain in the ass.

      I got my dreamcast modded because I have a pretty extensive library of japanese and US software for the system, and I didn't much feel like having to have both systems hooked up at the same time.

    52. Re:Score one for Tha Man by gnovos · · Score: 2

      I'd agree with this comment except MS needs to sell 4 games to make up for the loss they take on each system. If people buy XBOXes but don't buy games for them (i.e. they buy them to install Linux on so they can tap tap tap at it all day), then MS doesn't want their business. They lose.

      That's the fault of microsoft, though. If I sell a toothpick holder becuase I expect people to buy my gold plated toothpicks to put in it, I don't get to complain when they use it to hold thier paper clips.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    53. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selling Xbox mod chips is *exactly* like having a set of lockpicking equipment. Locks are meant to keep people out of areas they don't belong in; same goes for the 'security hardware' on the Xbox. You don't see the 5-0 arresting those guys that come and get your keys out of your locked car, do you?


      I have a skeleton keys for all 1970-2002 GM automobiles. Can I legally sell them?

    54. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "That's the fault of microsoft, though. If I sell a toothpick holder becuase I expect people to buy my gold plated toothpicks to put in it, I don't get to complain when they use it to hold thier paper clips."

      Error 44: Argument rejected, $Apples != $Oranges.

    55. Re:Score one for Tha Man by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      You mean like the ill-fated Indrema, or the 3DO? Heh.

      I don't really understand what you mean. What's the difference between the Indrema and 3DO and the other consoles, besides the fact that they failed? Nothing. The machine I described is exactly like a console (it *is* a console), but it's the result of a cooperative effort

      I stand by that comment. This thread has generated 36 replies so far, most of them are anti-MS bigotry. If I am wrong about you, then I apologize. If this topic were about Sony or Nintendo instead of MS, I wouldn't have all these stupid responses flooding my inbox.

      I understand your point about Microsoft, but I think we might be arguing about two different things. I think you're trying to say "of course microsoft would do that, they're a business, they're looking out for themselves like businesses do". I'm simply saying that it shouldn't be supported by the law.

      And anyway, when you say stuff like "of course they'd do that, they're only looking out for themselves..." you absolve them from a certain level of personal repsonsibility that most people demand from other people. You're acting like they're exempt because they're a company.

      Also, it's not about what I would or wouldn't do. Look at it this way. There are all sorts of ways to regulate the behavior of a company. The law is one of them. Public opinion is another. If you don't like what a company is doing, regardless of how "logical" it is for them to do it, then get upset. That will hurt their bottom line (maybe, if other people get upset too), and they'll have to factor that into the equation when it comes time for them to decide to do something similar again.

      Yes, assuming there were no such thing as public opinion, of course Microsoft is doing the "logical" thing. But public opinion, and word of mouth are powerful tools. Why give that up?

      Of course, you can't think on such low level terms. That's what morality, ethics and social norms are.

      So would I try to do the same thing if I were Microsoft? Probably. Does that mean it's okay? Should we just sit back and take it passively?

    56. Re:Score one for Tha Man by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the solution for Microsoft is to sell these modchips themselves. They are pretty expensive from what i hear, and microsoft just needs to sell them for enough so that they recuperate losses incurred on the initial sale.

      Of course, this may legitimise the mod-chips!

    57. Re:Score one for Tha Man by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Mod chips are not "Value adds".

      Value adds are the features inherant to the system as designed. It just so happens that the xbox is a very "value added" system inherantly.


      Being able to play pirated games, import games. or even just backups of your own purchased game so your original doesn't get all scratched up, is certainly "of value" to the END USER. Therefore, a mod-chip is a "value add" TO THE END USER. Microsoft might not like it, but that doesn't change the facts.

      The devaluation is at the software and game level. Is Developer X going to spend 5 million making a game that can be pirated with ease because someone can goto lik-sang.com and get a modchip? NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo

      The most "moddable" of the current generation of home consoles, by far, is the Playstation 2. Modchips were available even before the US launch. Yet despite this, the PS2 is the most popular console in all markets, and it has the most games by the largest group of developers.

      The Playstation was also easily modded and was insanely popular. The NES was the most popular console of it's era despire rampant piracy all over the world. It made Nintendo a fortune. Game Boy (and Color and Advance) is still selling well despite massive piracy of the carts. Microsoft is one of the richest companies in the world despite the fact that Windows and Office are probably the most pirated software packages in the world, etc.

      Piracy isn't an excuse for failure.

      What is the value of hacking a system to use it for purposes of which it isn't intended or designed for and why can't microsoft legally fight to protect its intended and protected interests?

      See above. Playing import games. or even just backups of your own purchased game so your original doesn't get all scratched up, is certainly a "legitimate" use of modchips.

      Even though i modded my dreamcast and could play pirated games, i didn't consider this a value add. For one, i couldn't read the japanese games and often times it wasn't worth the effort and for pirated games they were ripped, chunked, slow and missing features.

      Now I know you're an idiot. The Dreamcast didn't require a modchip to play pirated games. Many import games either are in English or have (like fighting games) very little text and dialog. Also there ARE people who can read Japanese in the US. I also can't think of ANY pirate game for the Dreamcast that isn't feature-complete or is seriously mangled. The only one I can think of is Skies of Arcadia which is split into 2 discs.

      it was the "value add" of the modchips and ripped DC games that ended the life of that console. (and the ps2.. but sega cited the loss of software sales because of rampant piracy and loss of developers because of rampant piracy to be a big factor)

      I have no doubt that Sega tried that whiney excuse. The Dreamcast failed mainly because Sega was hemmoraging money and couldn't compete with Sony's marketing muscle. They also had political problems with third-party developers.

      At the exact same time there was EVEN MORE rampant piracy on Sony's consoles. "Plugin" mods were available everywere and copying a disc involved 10 minutes of effort and a CD burner.

      Copying and modding dreamcast games involved specialized knowledge and equipment, though no actual modchips were required.

    58. Re:Score one for Tha Man by mpe · · Score: 2

      Loss leaders simply invite later protectionism. Companies that use them will end up using intellectual property claims or lobby for more direct industry tariff/duty approaches (this last has yet to happen realy in the console industry). While loss leaders are legal, they end up pinching away separate and should-be-legitimate business activities because the parent company will scream bloody murder that they are being robbed.

      Actually the problem isn't so much loss leaders as having a substantial portion of your business dependent on a loss leader product. When something like a supermarket uses loss leaders they don't need to kick up all this fuss. Because they are discounting a tiny proportion of their product lines. (If they discount a wide range of their products you can be sure they are still making a profit on those products.) The only thing they might have to do is say "no more than X per customer, per visit".
      Problem of applying the idea of a loss leader to games consoles or Internet appliancies is that these arn't a small portion of the product line, they are a large portion, sometimes even the vast majority of the product line...

    59. Re:Score one for Tha Man by mpe · · Score: 2

      If I want to drop a chevy engine into my ford, the car companies have no business making me stop from doinfg it, or making a mechanic not sell that service to there customers.

      But Ford would probably love to be able to stop you. Currently the only time the government is likely to get involved is if you want to drive your modified car on the public roads. In which case all they care about is if it's "street legal" not that it's to the original manufacturer's spec.

    60. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      As long as I am not unduly and tortiously interfering with the rights of others (people, not corporations)

      Under US law, corporations have the same rights as people. IIRc this was somehow gained by invoking a law that was meant to be for equal rights for black people as applicable for corporations. The judge agreed, and corporations became people ~100years ago.

    61. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Datafage · · Score: 1

      I'd have to say his argument is valid, and trying to reject it cutely doesn't absolve you of the need to prove it. Either back your statement up or retract it.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    62. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I'd have to say his argument is valid, and trying to reject it cutely doesn't absolve you of the need to prove it. Either back your statement up or retract it."

      His argument is invalid because it's 'apples to oranges'. (as stated in my previous post)

      Frankly, I don't intend to waste my time arguing with somebody who's going to oversimplify the situation and use obtuse metaphors to prove me wrong. He's just going to disregard any comment I make back because "MS is always wrong".

      I will not retract my statement. It should be rather obvious what the difference between selling razor blades and selling video games is. I'll give you a hint: copyright. The problem is that if I go deeper into it, it'll turn into a debate about how the law is wrong and blah blah blah. Then, people will automatically assume that I support the law being wrong (like the DMCA, for example), even though I haven't stated what I personally think.

      No, I will not waste my time. His argument is not within the ballpark of relevance, I'm not convinced that he'd have an open enough mind to listen to what I have to say (Note: Listen != Agree), and if I open that door I'm just going to get my ass jumped again.

    63. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Datafage · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how the games or OS being copyrighted in any way affects what you are allowed to do with the hardware, intrinsically. Mod chips that contain copyrighted code should be illegal, yes. That fails, however, to make it such that Microsoft or Gillette has the right to legally guaranteed profits with the loss leader business model, which is what is at question here. Do you think either of them should have mandated profit?

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    64. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Heh see, I was right. You're arguing with me over a point I hadn't made.

    65. Re:Score one for Tha Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a fucking idiot. you wouldnt look so stupid if you had read his post. i wonder what stupid thing is going to dribble out of your mouth next.

  4. Other Asian manufacturers need to be shut down... by qurob · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    The companies who make those crappy CPU fans and cases that don't fit right and just cut your fingers

    The people who make those really crappy NICs and video cards

    The people who make those little screwdrivers that band or strip on the first thing you take apart with them

    The companies that make those $2 keyboards and $1 mice I find at every company who's too cheap to buy decent stuff.

  5. Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When I said that its about them telling me what to do with my property??

    Many people yelled that it was just an upgrande and M$ was not telling me what to do with **MY** hardware. Well bite me, I knew M$ would prove me right.

    I dont own an X-box, I dont own a mod chip, but M$ continues with the attitude that you will use this the way we want you to use this, you will not dieveate at all from our buisness plan or we will label you a pirate and sue your sorry butt..

    --
    1. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its all about drawing a line. Putting in a mod chip to run foreign games is fine. Just as long as you understand that cracking open the console voids your warranty.

      Now placing in a mod chip to let you run burned CDs and such is legal, with the same warranty warning.

      Playing burned copies of non-owned games... that is illegal.

      So where do they draw the line on what you can do with your property and what you can't?

      Hey, I own a gun, its my property. I can shoot what I want!
      Hey, I own a car, its my property. I can go where I want, when I want, as fast as I want.

      The 'personal property' cry is childish. You need to learn the laws that restrict certain things with 'your property'.

    2. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by TheDick · · Score: 1
      Hey, I own a gun, its my property. I can shoot what I want! Hey, I own a car, its my property. I can go where I want, when I want, as fast as I want.

      To the first, if its my property, I probably can shoot what I want, especially at night in Texas.

      To the second, on my property, yep.

      Its once you are in PUBLIC and infringing on the rights of others where you run into problems.

      --

    3. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      I agree with you 100% stealing is bad and I dont do it. you seem to think I endorse stealing, I think If I want to mod something I have bought and paid for, for a non buinsess purpose (to back up games, or to run an OS) which is not getting aroung spending money I would otherwise have to spend its **MY** property.

      The personal property cry is not 'childish' If I use my property in a legal way, to do legal things on Ihave every right. There are few rights more fundimental than property.

      --
    4. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 1
      ...but M$ continues with the attitude that you will use this the way we want you to use this

      Wrong, all they did was keep a mod chip out of the mass consumer arena. You can still do whatever you want with an X-Box, whether its play the games, install your own mod chips, or use it for target practice.

      Just goes to show you, if you want to do something profitable and not get busted (e.g. cable box mods), keep it on the down low and don't start a damn website.

      --

      Trying is the first step towards failure.

    5. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      To the first, if its my property, I probably can shoot what I want, especially at night in Texas.

      In virtually every city (in the US, at least), it's illegal to discharge a firearm within the city limits, except for purposes of defense. I imagine firing ranges have some sort of special permits to get around this, but I've never asked about the specifics.

    6. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's forget the whole statement. There are never restrictions of any kind on anything people own. Well done. You managed to miss the whole point.

    7. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and Texas also executes retarded people. You've got things figured out down there.

    8. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by CoolVibe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not only tell Microsoft that. Sony hates modders too. Nintendo hates modders as well.

      Instead of just blaming Microsoft (the easy way), why not blame the other console corps as well? Blaming MS might be easy, but in console-country they aren't the only ones trying to keep hackers away from their so-called IP.

      *note: I hate Microsoft like the next guy. I have a MS free zone at home.

      PS: the M$ thing is old, give it a rest. I'm serious. Stop that. You will be taken more seriously if you refer to things by their real names/abbreviations. The Co$ is of course the exception of the rule. :)

    9. Re:Remember the Xbox upgrade article. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      I dont see sony and Nintendo trying to shut down companies in other countries for selling mod chips to their system.

      --
  6. Re:I don't care what you guys say by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate to ell you this AC its none of your damn buisness if I want to run Linux or back up my games (and YES I BACK UP EVERYTHING I OWN!).

    --
  7. [Trolling Stones] Whoa, slow down there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drive Microsofts target audience away

    Somehow I doubt that Microsoft's target audience is hackers that will only purchase xbox, either out of spite or desire to hack it. Microsoft's target audience, which by the way couldn't care less about mod chips, are gamers who buy the box and lots of games to play, not those who buy the box to not play games.

    g to the oatse
    c to the izzex

  8. Re:I don't care what you guys say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, dipshit, it's called "mainly non-infringing." Just because "MS sez so" is not a valid reason for them to say you can't modify your hardware and them attempting to enforce it by shutting down those who disagree with their team of lawyers. Your opinion on running anything on the Xbox means about as much to me as anyone else's opinion means to you -- nothing. So, what you should bitch about is that MS *IS* finding yet another way to exercise their monopoly power, even in foreign markets. Yay.

  9. Re:Other Asian manufacturers need to be shut down. by Servo · · Score: 1

    So why don't you take the first step and vote with your dollars? Buy the nice stuff instead of bitching after buying from the crappy ones.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  10. Legality.... by Tsali · · Score: 5, Funny

    haiku

    add architecture
    without the borg's consent?
    enlist the lawyers.

    \haiku

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Legality.... by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      haiku2

      zoning makes me mad
      how can i play cool imports
      do i have to move?

      \haiku2

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:Legality.... by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      the architechture that is seen
      is not the true architechture, when
      m$ enlists the lawyers.

      better yet

      Aborted Effort Lik
      Close all the sites that you have
      You are making too much

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    3. Re:Legality.... by Osty · · Score: 1

      Uh ... 5-7-5, man. 5-7-5.


      When writing haiku
      You must be able to count
      Or you will screw up

    4. Re:Legality.... by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      well, consider it post-modern haiku....

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
  11. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will be interesting is how they did and on what grounds.

    I was actually waiting to hear that the chips were being stopped at the border by Customs for violating the DMCA ala Serial Cables Illegal Due to DMCA?. Apparently MS had something else in mind.

  12. Follow the money by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm... Sony allows mod chips, stock goes up. Microsoft doesn't allow modchips, stock goes down. Go get 'em Microsoft!!

    Related Quotes
    Quotes delayed 20+ minutes

    MICROSOFT CORP MSFT 44.94 -0.67
    SONY CORP ADR SNE 40.84 0.18

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    1. Re:Follow the money by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I seriously doubt that MS shutting down a mod chip store effects their stock in any form.

      And screw sony too. Anyone that own's one of their DVD players knows about the infamous C:13 error that you get after about a year of usage. Thousands of consumers have this problem and Sony's only answer is to fix it for a mere 179 bucks.

      If you're having the problem, you can try to fix it here

    2. Re:Follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, I'd think that, if anything, that's a reaction to the news of modchips in general.
      Investors will look at the news about this 'modchip', and realize "shit! People can just burn games and play them! We'll loose profits! Sell Sell Sell!"

      Seems like the opposite is happening.

    3. Re:Follow the money by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Sony allows mod chips, stock goes up. Microsoft doesn't allow modchips, stock goes down.

      What a silly conclusion... As if there aren't a million other reasons why stocks fluctuate on a given day.

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    4. Re:Follow the money by willr7 · · Score: 0
      I actually did a study in school about the effects of mod chips on video game consoles in relation to stock price.

      The results were amazing, the conclusions unequivically point to the fact that Iguanaphobic user #31670 is an idiot.

  13. How could anyone not expect this to happen? by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The legality of xbox mod chips is ambiguous at best. Perhaps no crimes are committed in the production or installation of them, but consider that most users would utilize their modchip to play copied games or ROMs or Linux, etc. Xbox is sold at a loss.Microsoft needs to sell games for the xbox in order to recoup the losses it incurs for every unit sold.An easily accessible modchip that allows for people to NOT need to buy games for their xbox is a bad thing. Atleast for Microsoft.

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by Servo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know.. they could always charge more for the system and not have to make it up in games

      Its not my fault they sell the things at a loss. Why should I be forced to be their perfect consumer?

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by krasni_bor · · Score: 1

      Whether or not this is a good thing for the original manufacturer should be totally irrelevant. They sold their hardware, if they lost money on it, tough.

      This is exactly like GM shutting down companies that make spare parts for their cars, claiming that because the replacement parts let you go faster, that they are designed to help you break the law by exceeding the speed limit.

    3. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright! Lets just assume all consumers are thieves and ban all use of the ModChips, shall we?
      While we're at it, why don't we let RIAA hack into our computers, since we're all just thieves... right?

      You have to realise that not everyone is a thief, and not everyone uses modchips in that manner...

    4. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      The legality of the handgun is ambiguous at best. Perhaps no crimes are committed in the production of them, but consider that since most jurisdictions outlaw hunting with handguns, why else would you need one? An easily accessible handgun allows people to ROB convenience stores and MUG the elderly in Cetral Park.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Compaq cloning the IBM PC's BIOS? All that software developed by IBM (possibly at a loss) could now be run on cheaper Compaq computers with no benefits for IBM. Round and round we go.

    6. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      An easily accessible handgun allows people to ROB convenience stores and MUG the elderly in Cetral[sic] Park.

      So does a baseball bat or an easilly accessible knife. Shall we ban buck-knives? How about steaknives? Butterknives? Box cutters? Hell, we can all start eating applesauce instead, or pre-mashed foods a la the restaurant scene in Gilliam's Brazil,/i>, a dark comedic future that is looking more and more like contemporary America each day we spend under the dubious tutalage of Baby Bush.

      I'm not a fan of the NRA or handguns in particular, but the notion of disallowing technologies, be they potential weapons, chips, or software, because of what people might possibly do with them is the kind of fallacious logic that got us into this mess to begin with. People may not like the slippery slope argument, and indeed may even label it logically fallacious (which it may in fact be), but historical evidence shows just how apropos the argument remains when applied to real world social and political policy, and while historical performance may not be a guarantee of future performance, ignoring it is a certain means to learning nothing whatsoever from history and repeating it again, ad nauseum.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    7. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      An easily accessible handgun allows people to defend themselvs from being Robbed and allow the elderly to defend themselves in Cetral Park.

      The gun is "the great equalizer". an 80 pound elderly woman can protect herself from a 300 pound maniac.

      Funny, noone keeps number on the amount of crime prevented, and the enumber of lives saved because of a handgun.

      Personally, I would use a pump action shot gun with an open choke for home defence, but that is a personal choice.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I got halo with that bundle they forced me to get, there arent any games worth copying anyway!

    9. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      You'll also want a short barrel to maximize spread as well as increase maneuverability in tight corridors.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    10. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by Quelain · · Score: 1

      Gun Death - International Comparisons

      Gun deaths per 100,000 population (for the year indicated):
      Homicide Suicide Unintentional
      USA 4.08 (1999) 6.08 (1999) 0.42 (1999)
      Canada 0.54 (1999) 2.65 (1997) 0.15 (1997)
      Switzerland 0.50 (1999) 5.78 (1998) -
      Scotland 0.12 (1999) 0.27 (1999) -
      England/Wales 0.12 (99/00) 0.22 (1999) 0.01 (1999)
      Japan 0.04* (1998) 0.04 (1995) <0.01 (1997)

      * Homicide & attempted homicide by handgun

      Data collected by Philip Alpers, Harvard Injury Control Research Center, and HELP Network

      from: http://www.gun-control-network.org/facts.htm

      --
      Cthulhu loves you.
    11. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by evbergen · · Score: 2

      I can also understand why, in the case of handguns, in many countries the technology to commit the crime is regulated instead of just the crime itself; a single misaimed gunshot causes irrepairable damage to human life. They are extremely dangerous devices, so I can see why a democratic government would choose to regulate trafficking of guns, even before any crime has been committed with them.

      Copying on the other hand causes no damage by itself, regardless of what's being copied. Only *distribution* of copied things causes *economic* damage. So why a democratic government would want to prohibit a means (unrestricted digital technology) to a prerequisite (copying data) to the actual *economic* crime (mass-distributing copies), while it does not want to regulate guns, based on the argument 'we only go after the crime itself', is completely, totally, utterly beyond me.

      Unless, of course, this 'democratic' government cares more for money than for human life. It sure is telling about its priorities, in any case.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    12. Re:How could anyone not expect this to happen? by I+hate+Perl · · Score: 0

      How about the fact that this democratic goverment has to abide by the words of the constitution which clearly prohibits it from taking away people's right to own a gun ?
      BTW.
      Guns in US are _heavily_ regulated - meaning one has to go thru shitload of trouble to get one.

  14. I really hope this is overturned. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    It's one thing to restrict the sales of bullets and guns to infants, but mod chips aren't exactly something which is a danger to society. What are they used for? Modifications to behaviour of a device.

    Unless there was a market force demanding it, they wouldn't sell well enough that people would keep buying them. See also region free DVD players. They're just as popular now as ever, because people want the freedom in their products.

    And that doesn't take into account the fact that once I buy something, it's mine. I own it, I do with it as I please. If I want to rip the top off my Xbox, shit in it, and then grow a plant out of that moist, fertile soil -- that's my business. Microsoft has as much business stopping the sales of mod chips as they do teaching mothers how to breastfeed.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:I really hope this is overturned. by antitribue · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has as much business stopping the sales of mod chips as they do teaching mothers how to breastfeed.

      This just in....
      MS is sueing Mothers that breastfeed while not using the latest version of XP
      Company representitives site EULA from Windows Critical update hotfix v4.32.34.1.

    2. Re:I really hope this is overturned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what this article is about, do you?

    3. Re:I really hope this is overturned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shit dirt?

      Quit eating dirt, dumbass.

    4. Re:I really hope this is overturned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he's an earthworm?

  15. How complicated are mod-chips? by phorm · · Score: 2

    Perhaps the best fight-back method would be to make the instructions for creating mod-chips more publicly available. In this case, every little shop would eventually proliferate them, and it would become too difficult to chase everyone down.

    Of course, in a business sense this is a really bad idea, as it just creates competition. But in a hardware-modders right-to-change-my-property, fight the machine sense it would be nice.

    1. Re:How complicated are mod-chips? by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      The real issue is that most (if not all) XBox mod chips are using code/software leaked from a XBox devkit. This makes these chips (the ones based on this source) illegal. Making the chips isn't all that hard. The hard part is the software in the chips. Without a legal source for software, everybody in the XBox mod chip business is going to get nailed by MS.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:How complicated are mod-chips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making an xbox modchip really isn't that difficult. Anyone with a little determination can do it. Check http://xboxhacker.net for more info.

    3. Re:How complicated are mod-chips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creating the modchips isn't very complicated. The methods range from flashing an EEPROM in a motherboard with a "third-party" BIOS and simply soldering the thing to the XBOX motherboard with 29 or so jumpers to doing a board layout either on a PCB or a breadboard for the BIOS and a flasher. The latter approach involves one semi-hairy board connection and 8 or 9 easy ones. It is also released under a hardware GPL and is available at http://warmcat.com/milksop/cheapLPC.html and
      http://warmcat.com/milksop/cheapmod.html

  16. Well, there's always... by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 5, Informative

    Easybuy.

    For now, at least.

    Note: I have no affiliation with LikSang, or EasyBuy - they're just pretty similar. LikSang had a larger variety of video-game oriented products, but EasyBuy has most of the more popular modchips as well.

    --

    This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

  17. This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm already reading stuff on here from users about how MS is now telling them what to do with the property they bought. This is NOT what is happening! You as a user can open up your XBox and hack the hardware as much as you want, hack it so it bypasses whatever security's in there, they won't care. However, take that hack and turn it into a business for yourself by manufacturing hardware and selling it IS what they will move against. In my opinion, they have every right to do that, and it has nothing to do with a monopoly on anything. Just my opinion! Comments?

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah .. is it illegal to start a spark plug company and sell spark plugs for cars you don't manufacture yourself?

      What right does MS have in preventing people from selling after-market mods .. ? Where did this right come from? When? Why?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Installing the alternative spark plug doesn't cheat the original manufacturer out of any profit.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah .. is it illegal to start a spark plug company and sell spark plugs for cars you don't manufacture yourself?


      Conrgrats, this is probably the stupidest /. post I have ever read. You should have said "Yeah.. is it illegal to start a company that "redials" odometers on cars?" and I would have said. "Duh"

    4. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 2
      I can't think of a more apples and oranges comparison than that. Or wait, maybe not. What if those spark plugs had some kind of magical ability to let you get gasoline for free? Or if the spark plugs in your car allowed you to blow out my tires when driving down the road? Someone might get concerned about those spark plugs, oh yes.

      In the same way, Microsoft is trying to stop piracy of games and hacking that could potentially spill over into its XBox Live service. They want to make that as secure as possible to prevent abuse of the system and other users, and stomping on commercialized hacking ventures is probably their way of sending out a message. Again, this does not stop you from opening up your xbox and replacing its OS with Linux, or sticking a fishtank in it. You bought it, its yours.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    5. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, take that hack and turn it into a business for yourself by manufacturing hardware and selling it IS what they will move against. In my opinion, they have every right to do that, and it has nothing to do with a monopoly on anything.

      I'm curious why you think MS has a right to stop a legitimate business from trying to turn a profit.

      Mod chips are, protests to the contrary, legal. The only ground MS might have to contest them on would be through the DMCA, as a chip could be used to run a pirated copy of a game. However, the DMCA also makes allowances for circumvention with "significant non-infringing uses", which a mod chip certainly has (seeing as how many people here want to run Linux on it). Of course, the law only supports consumers as far as they're willing to pay their lawyers.

      MS didn't license the Xbox to anyone, as anyone who owns one will tell you. People bought it outright, they can do whatever they want to it. People can sell hardware, software, instructions, whatever they want to help people modify their box.

      Some people have taken the opinion that MS is only attacking those things which might threaten their profitability (such as giving people the ability to write/distribute their own, unsigned games). Okay, then why don't they go after aftermarket controller manufacturers, since they obviously compete with MS controllers?

      This whole thing really irks me, and I'm not sure what bothers me more -- them getting away with it, or people believeing that MS has some kind of right to protect their flawed business model. Okay, maybe MS isn't making much money on hardware (as we all seem to believe). And we then assume they make that money back in development fees. So? I don't recall signing a piece of paper, when I bought my Xbox, that said I'd support Microsoft's business plan. Their plan is their own business. Lik Sang's business plan is, similarly, their business, and no one else's. They saw a need, and filled it. Sure, it's possible that mod chips might cut into a small fraction of game sales. Again, that's not my problem.

      If chipping cuts into a significant fraction of sales, and people stop making games, and the platform dies, then, well, that is my problem, and I'll be disappointed. O h, well, too bad, maybe next time. I'll still have gotten my $300 worth of fun out of the box. But, again, that's how the market works.

      This is capitalism at its best.

      I find it ironic that it's China that has the strongest support of capitalism, and the US that has the strongest implicit government support of illegal monopolies.

    6. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by kenthorvath · · Score: 2

      Why, is it illegal to redial the odometer on a car you own? If not, then why would it be illegal to do it for somebody else who consents?

    7. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      And the modchip doesn't cheat MS out of profit. Just like the VCR doesn't cheat the movie biz out of profit, even tho I have 20 copied movies at home (probably like you or many of your neighbours.) Well, okay, it does but its been tolerated for the last 20 odd years .. grandparents who wouldn't go through the express lane at the grocery story with more than 8 items routinely use VCR's illegally.

      The VCR gets used illegaly several times a day by people on your street. So will the modchip. No need to whip out the laywers and put your customers in diapers. We've been through this before .. I feel bad for people who honestly think MS has some sort of legal right to prevent the sale of tools which may or may not be used to conduct illegal activity by the fucking people giving MS money for the console in the first place.

      Don't trust your consumers? Move into another goddamned market space, but don't treat your customers like babies hanging out in the smoking pit behind the school. Time will sort this all out, but I garauntee you that MS's tactics are unsustainable in a market where humans (consumers, for the sales/marketers) _always_ get the last say.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    8. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      The X-Box is not a piece of software. You don't buy a license to use an X-Box, you buy *an actual unit*.

      Once you own a piece of hardware, you should have every right to turn it into a toaster if you feel like it. You own it. It's yours. Noone should be able to tell you what you can or can't do with it.

      This is why shutting down modchip makers is frightening. We are losing the right to do whatever we want with our property.

      Remember, you OWN the hardware. If you want to let uncle bob solder some strange asian chip onto it, there shouldn't be anything standing in your way, other than the voiding of the warrenty (which is fair).

      It's a sad state of affairs when any business is able to release deliberately crippled products and shut down anyone who tries to un-cripple them.

      Imagine if they did this in the auto industry, artificially limiting the horsepower of a Civic so you can turn it into a MX-6 by modifying the onboard computer. First, it would be a retarded thing for them to do, second, they'd be laughed out of court if they tried to stop people from selling the modifications.

      Mod-chips are a God given right.

    9. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Dannon · · Score: 2

      Actually, I believe it is, depending on where you live, at least if you intend to sell that car. The reason? By selling a car with a higher mileage than is shown on the odometer, you are committing fraud. The mileage on a car is crucial to having a true estimate of that car's value.

      And, if it's not illegal, at least it's somewhat monitored. I remember last time I went to buy a car, and I looked up the CarFax report, it had a section where a 'red flag' would be tossed up if, at any time, there were any evidence that someone had tampered with the odometer and sold it at a higher price than it was worth.

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    10. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 2

      Good points throughout. One thing I'd like to qualify further is, I'm not saying that they have every right under law x section y subsection z to shut down Lik Sang. I'm saying that it's entirely within their right as a company to make whatever moves they want, within the established laws, to stonewall mod chip manufacturers -- be that as an ad campaign against it, or buying out the whole company and dissolving it. And they're not being anticompetetive in doing so; Microsoft doesn't make mod chips, and Lik Sang's business doesn't endorse other consoles in favor if the XBox.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    11. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Then explain why radar detectors can be sold. They are only used to avoid cops so that people can speed in peace. Any 'legit' use is minimal .. I mostly see them on the 'decks of imports that are probably going above the speedlimit for 80% of their street life.

      Do we shut down people who sell performance parts (because the vast majority of these parts end up in street imports driven by testosterone-driven 22 year olds who revel in breaking the speed limit) ... NO WE DONT. We punish the people who use these parts illegally.

      Care you try again?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    12. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is, you idiot.

    13. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      One thing I'd like to qualify further is, I'm not saying that they have every right under law x section y subsection z to shut down Lik Sang. I'm saying that it's entirely within their right as a company to make whatever moves they want, within the established laws, to stonewall mod chip manufacturers -- be that as an ad campaign against it, or buying out the whole company and dissolving it.

      I'll agree with all that, certainly. It seems, though, that they may have taken a legal approach here (or used strongarm tactics, like muscling Lik Sang's ISP, maybe) to shut it down. The article was, unfortunately, unclear on how exactly MS "shut" them down.

      I always chuckle when people complain (like earlier this week) that a manufacturer has changed their hardware to "thwart" mod chip makers. That's a legitimate, and easy way, to deal with the problem. Driving people out of business isn't.

      I really like the "buy them out and close the shop" approach -- how do I get in on that scam?

    14. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 2
      Driving people out of business isn't. I really like the "buy them out and close the shop" approach -- how do I get in on that scam?

      Both of these things probably happen a lot more than you or I are aware of. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    15. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Shutting down mod chips does NOT mean you're unable to do what you want with your hardware. You can design and build your own mod chip, put it in there and go to town, no big deal. Or turn it into a toaster if you like. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    16. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Amanset · · Score: 2

      Even if they are cheating MS out of profit (somethigng that I disagree with and, as someone else has pointed out, does MS have a God-given right to profit?), what law has Lik-Sang broken?

      There are a lot of people here saying that they think Lik-Sang have done something wrong and thus MS are in the right. The thing is no-one can me a reason why, using the law instead of moral reasoning, as to why Lik-Sang are wrong.

    17. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Laf! Short simple and to the point.
      *cheer*

    18. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 1

      Then explain why radar detectors can be sold. They are only used to avoid cops so that people can speed in peace. Any 'legit' use is minimal .. I mostly see them on the 'decks of imports that are probably going above the speedlimit for 80% of their street life.

      Because radar detectors are only illegal in a few backwards places, like D.C. and Virginia. And just so you know, people with high-performance domestic cars (say, a Mustang GT, or a Corvette, for example) also tend to have radar detectors where they're legal. It just makes sense -- sometimes you're going faster than you think. Ever driven a true performance car? No, that Honda Civic with the big-ass wing is not a performance car. If you've driven a real, true high-performance car (domestics like a Mustang GT or a Corvette, imports like any of the Porsche line, the sportier Mercedes and Bimmers, etc), you'll know that they can get going a lot faster than you expect, and when you're going 20 over, you really don't feel like you're gong 20 over. Therefore, a radar detector helps you keep that in check, by chirping at you when it detects something, causing you to slow down.


      Of course, that's still an apples v. oranges comparison, because modchips are illegal as copyright circumvention devices, and radar detectors are not.

    19. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      What if the modchip lets me watch DVD's not encoded for my region? What if I want to use it to play legal backups of my own games? What if I want to use it so I can install linux on my xbox? Fuck, why not outlaw soldering irons. "You're more than welcome to do what you want with *your* hardware, but we can't allow people to sell things that may or may not be used to copy our software." The whole line of reasoning is bullshit.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    20. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Mod chips break laws. They allow you to play
      > games without paying for them.

      Guns break laws. They allow you to shoot people.

      Crowbars break laws. They allow you to break into people's houses without permission.

      Computers break laws. They allow you to hack into other people's computers.

      Personally I wasn't aware that inanimate objects could break laws. Could you please let us all know when this did become the case?

    21. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Couldn't have said it better myself. Thanks ;-) Of course, you'll get modded down because god forbid anyone tries to say anything positive about MS on /.

    22. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Shutting down mod chips does NOT mean you're unable to do what you want with your hardware.

      Yes, it does. It means that I can not buy a modification device so that I might change my hardware's behavior. What right do you have to stop me from doing that, or stop someone else from selling something that I want? (Something which I hope you compare to guns or lockpicks or grenades in your response, because that would be really original)

    23. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That line of reasoning is flawed. YOu can still do all of those things with your hardware and I doubt Microsoft would care at all -- turn around and take your ubermodchip and make a business around it an they might take notice, in a not-so-nice way. In that it's VERY different from a soldering iron. Your mod chip is meant to do one thing and one thing only: circumvent some kind of hardware based protection they've put in there for a reason. Don't compare it to a tool like a soldering iron, or a screwdriver. THAT's bullshit.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    24. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > Installing the alternative spark plug doesn't
      > cheat the original manufacturer out of any profit.

      What right did the original manufacturer have to profit in the first place?

    25. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > Again, this does not stop you from opening up your > xbox and replacing its OS with Linux

      If eliminating mod chips does not stop me from putting linux on an xbox, how do I put linux on without a mod chip? A link to such information would be very helpful.

    26. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      I think the legality of tampering with the odometer is up to the states. In New Jersey, titles and odmeter statements have two checkboxes:

      1. I/We hereby certify that to the best of my/our knowledge the odometer has exceeded its mechanical limits and the reading started again at zero.
      2. WARNING - ODMETER DISCREPANCY - I/We hereby certify that the odometer reading is NOT the actual mileage, and should not be relied on for accuracy.

      (Taken off the back of a New Jersey title, capitalization is their's)

      So, it is not illegal as long as you check box #2 when you sell it.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    27. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      I see what you're saying, don't get me wrong. My point is mod chips shouldn't be illegal.

      But you know what? If zoning didn't exist, I'd have no problem with making mod chips illegal. Absolutely none. If their sole purpose was to play copied games, fine. Make them illegal and deal with the bigger issue of copyright.

      But until anyone can prove to me that it wasn't against the will of people and unethical to zone games geographically, keeping people from buying import games that wouldn't be released here, I have 0 sympathy.

      Zoning exists so they can get better returns on their investment, not because consumers want it. So I have no sympathy that they now have to fight an unpopular battle because some people actually want to do something that they don't see as being unethical (playing purchased zoned games). MS left the door wide open for an excuse to develop piracy-enabling devices .. all because of the greedy motives behind zoning.

      Technology is power, dude. The market used to be able to correct the power of producers, but technology is now sufficiently complex enough to allow producers to weild power over the market through a lack of education, FUD, lobbying, and technolgical measures. Companies that use technological means to maximize margins against the will of people do not deserve to not be protected from the consequences of those actions.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    28. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by hublan · · Score: 1

      What right does MS have in preventing people from selling after-market mods .. ? Where did this right come from? When? Why?

      Didn't you read the EULA? They only licensed the console to you. You don't really own it, you see :-)

      --
      My spoon is too big.
    29. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Whats REALLY ironic is that your popup-killer sig is exactly the same as piracy. In order for sites to remain profitable, you have to view the ad. You're using technological means to cheat the provider out of revenue for the infromation they provide you. Thats piracy .. you're saying 'too bad for serving me the content in a format which I can cheat. and because I can cheat it, I will'. How will the writers/artists get paid for providing you with the content you come across on the web?

      Now _that_ is ironic, and I'm afraid that the credibility you build in this thread (I was just beginning to agree with you) is all gone. Hypocrite. :)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    30. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Dont you find it a little ironic that hes got a fucking POPUP KILLER in his sig? Thats a goddamned mod chip for websites. (Since it cheats the website out of revenue that they _expect_ when people view their site, just like a mod chip cheats MS out of revenue that they _expect_ when people use content on their platform.)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    31. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid analogy. Very stupid. There's a huge world of difference between a spark plug and a modchip. One is a necessary piece of hardware, the other is used almost solely for piracy alone. Stealing other people's products in other words. Remember cable descramblers? Same thing, basically. It allows you to take for free what others are paying for legitimately. Much the same with most P2P applications..people vehemently defend Gnutella et. al. here not because they wish to defend their right to a free Internet, but because they wish to defend their supposed "right" to steal other people's property.

      I can't believe anyone actually modded that nonsense up, I suspect some of the people with the power to do so are living in blissful ignorance of the facts.

    32. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      In many states it's only illegal to pass a modified odometer reading off as the actual value. That's fraud. It's not illegal to change the readout, or to replace the odometer. If you look on the bill of sale from for cars in most states, you'll see a check box and a blank where you can disclose that the odometer was modified and what the actual mileage is.

    33. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by sedawkgrep · · Score: 2

      Isn't a screwdriver used to open something that was secured?

      In a way, a screwdriver is just as much a security circumvention device.

      However - it is not a very good analogy to the modchip. It is nigh impossible to make comparisons because we're talking about [hardware and] software - they're just fundamentally different than tangible devices and tools.

      Given that though, I still think that the modchip itself should be 100% legal because it is simply a tool. A tool that contains no illegal information itself. A tool that only affects the end-user, and doesn't (even potentially) cause damage to MS outside of that person's Xbox. (i.e. it doesn't affect anyone else's xbox or software)

      sedawkgrep

      --
      Is that a salami in my pants or am I just happy to be me?
    34. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 2

      Whats REALLY ironic is that your popup-killer sig is exactly the same as piracy. In order for sites to remain profitable, you have to view the ad. You're using technological means to cheat the provider out of revenue for the infromation they provide you. Thats piracy .. you're saying 'too bad for serving me the content in a format which I can cheat. and because I can cheat it, I will'. How will the writers/artists get paid for providing you with the content you come across on the web?

      Ah, no, young grasshopper. Try using the software before critcizing it, next time. My software, just like Mozilla's popup-blocker, only blocks popups. It doesn't block banner ads, interstitials, flash ads, and all the other forms of online advertising. It blocks pop-ups, because I find them annoying. However, unlike Mozilla, you're given a choice on whether or not you want to allow popups from a site, or to a particular site (ie, filter on source or destination of a pop-up). If you have a site that uses pop-ups, and you particularly like the site and want to support them, great -- allow pop-ups from that site. If you have a certain pop-up you don't like, like X10's crap, then kill only that popup. In either case, the popup ad still has to load (just long enough to get the destination URL), so any advertiser paying by views rather than clicks will count the ad as "seen".


      In other words, no hypocrisy here at all. My software only blocks one form of online advertising, and allows you to let that through for specific sites, if you want.

    35. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 2
      Actually I'm not "arguing", I like to think I'm carrying on a discussion. And I won't be baited into going for the guns and lockpicks example. :P

      And I reiterate: no, it doesn't. You can open it up and turn the xbox into anything you want, they're just making it more difficult for someone else to do the work for you.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    36. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or if the spark plugs in your car allowed you to blow out my tires when driving down the road?

      I'm trying to convert these examples back to the world of gaming consoles. Are you saying that somebody with a modified XBox can damage somebody else's XBox?

      My answer would be: you shouldn't blow out somebody's tires because it would be physically dangerous to people on the road. How does that apply to gaming consoles?

    37. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by marauder404 · · Score: 1

      A nuclear weapon *could* be used to kill millions of people. But it could also be used as a paperweight. Everyone should be allowed to have a nuke on their desk.

    38. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Winterblink · · Score: 2

      Let me go no record as saying I totally agree with you. :) It SHOULD be legal, and in fact it kinda sorta is (hence the grey market status). It IS only a tool, and it IS your hardware. All I'm getting at is, people shouldn't be flogging Microsoft for doing what they think is in their best interests. And it may not cause damage outside your xbos now, but what happens when xbox live is turned on, and mod chippers are in there abusing the service? Using it to hack other peoples' xboxes, cheat in games, whatever? Hypothetical I know, but what if?

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    39. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      Don't companies who manufacture controllers for the system need Microsoft's permission to do so? I would guess that they asked MS for the technical specifications of the controller's interface (they wouldn't want their controller to anything worse than the original) and are paying a nominal sum to sell products. I doubt that these companies had to reverse engineer the Xbox controller in order to sell their product, but I welcome, nay, I invite anyone to prove me wrong.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    40. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      >My software only blocks one form of online advertising, and allows you to let that through for specific sites, if you want.

      In other words, the content provider trusts you to use the technology responsibly instead of trying to legislatively put popup killer companies out of business because *some* of their users use them to totally sqaush all advertising? This is hilarious. How can you possibly support MS for going after mod chip makers if those mod chip makers use them responsibly, and then defend your use of a tool that will strip content providers of revenue (popups have to fully load, sometimes even sit for a few seconds, before a website gets paid for it in the majority of ad networks and ad serving systems .. I should know, I write ad servers for a living) ...

      See? I don't have a problem with you using a popup killer. But you're stripping revenue from sites that deserve it, based on what *you* feel they deserve for what they're providing you.

      Then, you go and defend MS for going after companies that make technology that does the *exact* same thing .. lets people access some content the producer would deny them from unless they paid full price for it or bought it in the correct region/market. You're saying: "MS has the right to ensure that nobody consumes their content unless its in the *exact* way they provide it, in the *exact* market they provide it", but use software that does *exactly* the same thing.

      Haha. I'm in the ad business, and I have no qualms with your software. What I want to know is why its different that MS has the apparent right to enforce their qualms with mod chips.

      Incidentally, popups pay out anywhere from 4 to 10 times what banner ads do. Stripping out the popup ads is a large hit on a websites revenue, because they count on popups WAY more than banners for revenue. But I guess youre smart, responsible, and ethical enough to know all these thigns already right? Why are we wasting time discussing this when there are people watching import games in markets they don't live in!! Lets catch the real criminals!

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    41. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      The only thing I'd like is the right to the freedom required to break the law when I want.

      If the cops want to arrest me for breaking the law, I'm fully prepared to pay for my actions. 100%. Come and arrest me. Just don't limit my freedom to make the choice of whether to be law abiding or not.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    42. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The recording provision of VCR's is used almost exclusively for piracy. Does this mean they should be illegal? The courts have decided that if they have "substantial non-infringing uses", then they are not illegal. The ability to run your own programs on the hardware you bought and paid for seems to me like a substantial non-infringing use.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    43. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 1

      Then, you go and defend MS for going after companies that make technology that does the *exact* same thing .. lets people access some content the producer would deny them from unless they paid full price for it or bought it in the correct region/market. You're saying: "MS has the right to ensure that nobody consumes their content unless its in the *exact* way they provide it, in the *exact* market they provide it", but use software that does *exactly* the same thing.

      No, I'm saying, "MS has the right to stop someone from selling a copyright circumvention device (aka, modchip)." What I'm not saying is, "MS has the right to stop you from modifying your XBox." If you want to modify your XBox, have at it. But you don't have the right to buy illegal modchips to do so.


      Incidentally, popups pay out anywhere from 4 to 10 times what banner ads do. Stripping out the popup ads is a large hit on a websites revenue, because they count on popups WAY more than banners for revenue. But I guess youre smart, responsible, and ethical enough to know all these thigns already right?

      I realize pop-up ads pay more than banner ads, but I blame that not on the users who blocked banner ads, or those who block pop-up ads, but on companies that misunderstand the internet and refuse to treat it like any other media where advertising is out there to create brand recognition, not to garner an immediate sale. So what if I didn't click on your banner? I saw it, and if I see it enough, I just might connect "Joe Sixpack's Computer Sales" with buying a new computer next time I think "I need to buy a new computer." Just because I don't need to buy a new computer now doesn't mean your ad failed. Pop-ups don't fix this. They just work on the annoyance factor. Or worse, they rely on trickery (how many times have you seen a popup that looks like it has a titlebar and close button, but you know it doesn't because they designed the gif for win98, and not XP or Linux or Mac? How many people do you think get sucked into that?). I'm fine with interstitials. IGN uses them, and I have no problem with it. I don't like the flash ads that come up over the top of an article, effectively making the article unreadable. That's why I have ActiveX applets set to require my permission to run (uh-oh! Is Microsoft providing ad-blocking software built-into Internet Explorer, because it allows me to select which Flash applets I want to let run, and which I don't? Oh no! Hipocrisy!).


      I guess my point is that the difference is that blocking pop-up ads (and only pop-up ads, mind you) is reducing my annoyance factor with everyday web browsing, which is not illegal.(what? You say I can't change the channel on my TV when an ad comes on? Is that illegal?) Adding a modchip to an XBox (or a PS2, for that matter, and Sony came down on modchip makers for that, too) is effectively designed for stealing games. Sure, you may use it for import games or running linux, but you can't tell me the temptation isn't there for you to go and download games rather than buying them. Trust me, I knew a lot of people in college with chipped PSXs, and even though they had decent jobs (decent for students, of course), rather than buying PSX games they'd just go to Blockbuster, rent a game, and rip it.

    44. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      I didn't use the word "arguing" or argument. You might have been thinking of someone else. I actually thought your point was quite valid, I just didn't manage to say so before. In a hurry and all, you know...

      I still remain unconvinced that there is some difference, legal or otherwise (aside from that contained in the DMCA) between me modifying my device by studying its schematics and me selling my modification device so that others do not have to replicate my work. Why is one good and the other one bad?

    45. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 1

      But until anyone can prove to me that it wasn't against the will of people and unethical to zone games geographically, keeping people from buying import games that wouldn't be released here, I have 0 sympathy.

      As you're the one wishing to change the status quo, the onus is on you to prove that people don't want zoning of games and movies, not upon me to prove that they do. Though, I'll bite. I have no research to back this up, obviously, but let's think about this rationally for a moment. The mass market in any country likes the games/movies they play/watch to be in their language. They also like them to run in the same format as their TVs (NTSC vs. PAL). Now, that means that most people in the US won't want Japanese games, because they're not in English, and most people in the UK won't want US games because they're not in PAL format. UK gamers won't want Japanese games because they're both in Japanese and not in PAL format. (yes, yes, I know that some TVs do both PAL and NTSC, and some people speak multiple languages, or don't care about the language like for an action game, but those are definitely in the minority.) And so on. What that means is that most people, whether there was zoning or not, would still wait for the software to be released in their market before buying it. What that tells me is that there's only a minority that even care about zoning at all, and likely even a minority within that minority that want to get rid of it. That's not to say that the majority would fight to keep zoning if the companies suddenly decided to remove it, only that they wouldn't care one way or the other.


    46. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Sure, you may use it for import games or running linux, but you can't tell me the temptation isn't there for you to go and download games rather than buying them.

      So, things should be illegal because you and some others have a suspicion that they are to be used for illegal purposes? How very fascistic of you. You mentioned the legitimate purposes of the chip in the same breath with which you condemned it.

    47. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      >You say I can't change the channel on my TV when an ad comes on? Is that illegal?

      Actually, according to the MSes of the TV world, yes. And your agument that MS should be able to stop people from selling technology that allows you to circumvent their revenue stream means television should have the right to stop people from selling technologies which allow people to circumvent commercials. (Cause then how do the people making the shows get paid?)

      Your answer, which I believe is *right*, is that its up to the producer to select a business model that people will not seek to circumvent. The market works because people pay what they're willing to pay, not because they've a gun to their head saying *you have to pay for this*. Your friends are jerks. I yell at my friends who do anything like that, even down to skipping turnstyles and the like. You should to.

      But alas, we can all shuck our social ethics, because thank god, companies are finally starting to ethically police us themselves!

      Look, this isn't black and white, but thats the very reason why you should be erring on the side of assuming people can use that technology ethically, for the same reason you asume as much about your blocking software. If banner ads annoyed you, would you block those to? How do you know other users of that software are as ethical as you? The tempation would be there to block *all* ad popups, and even grab tools to block banners, just as the tempation is there to copy games.

      This is why Nintendo is smart. They choose media that will have low piracy rates, take the moderate hit on not having the 'latest and greatest', and focus on doing what they do best. Pleasing gamers. MS would rather use technologies that dangle the carrot in front of your friends' nose, and then go after the folks who provide the obvious solution to the obvious and predictable demand for piracy. It is this same reason why I'm not opposed to ad blocking. We can police ourselves. If we can't, you as a producer, are in the wrong business.

      Not that it matters. That 'tempation', as you put it, will always exist. Popup killers, channel changers, dual cassette decks, remote controls will always exist. Trying to ban the tool never works; you can only alter people's behaviour through technology, not deny it via denying people technology after its been adopted. Its a pretty core fundamental of the relation between technology and social values and behaviour.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    48. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 1

      So, things should be illegal because you and some others have a suspicion that they are to be used for illegal purposes?

      Isn't that what most of the world has done with guns? "You can't own a firearm, because you might use it to shoot somebody." I disagree with that stance, but fine, I'll be a hypocrit. I think there's no reason for modchips to be sold. If you want to build your own, great. If you want to buy specs to build your own, I'm fine with that, too. But if you want to buy one, too bad.

    49. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

      No, I don't really think you're allowed to build your own guns either, if the type of gun you're building has been outlawed in your area.

      Guns are a bad comparison because outlawing guns might protect people from being hurt. A lot of very reasonable people are perfectly willing to give up some of their personal right to bear arms if it might mean that fewer people will die.

      Mod chips do not harm any person. They might harm the bottom line of a corporation, and as I don't work for a console manufacturer, it's not really my responsibility to help ensure their future profitability. I can't think of a good analogy, but if some company came along and could demonstrate that hammers cut into their profit margin, would you outlaw those as well?

      Incidentally, what is the difference between buying a mod chip and building your own? What do you feel separates the two, morally or legally or whatever way you want to look at it? (Besides the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA, of course, which we are already aware of).

    50. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      What will be funnier is when someone writes software to make xbox live think that their pc is an xbox and lets it on the network. Harder to restrict the flow of software than hardware, and a lot of damage could be done. Are there any functional xbox emulators?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    51. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Zordak · · Score: 1
      Installing the alternative spark plug doesn't cheat the original manufacturer out of any profit.
      I don't even play video games other than maybe solitaire on my Visor, so I don't care much about game consoles, but I am an engineer, so I care a great deal about the right of the end use to modify hardware. The fact that MS knowingly sells the XBox at a loss, counting on sales of games to make up the difference, does not mean you are somehow cheating them if you do not buy those games. When they offer the console at a certain price, your only obligation in procuring the console is to pay that price. Once you have paid that price, you do not owe them anything. If they find that the business model of selling the consoles at a loss is not working, they have no legal recourse against those consumers who did not decide to buy additional games. A company that profits from selling hardware modification kits is likewise not in the wrong, unless they are doing something illegal at the same time (like selling pirated games). If Microsoft finds that people are pirating games, then they are welcome to seek judgements against those pirating the gams. But under no circumstances should it be illegal to modify or facilitate the modification of purchased hardware. If Microsoft cannot offer the XBox at a competitive price and still turn a profit, then they need to get out of the console business.

      By the way, one of the major sources of income for auto manufacturers is parts. Parts are manufactured to fail at certain intervals and they intentionally make it difficult for third parties to make replacement parts so that they can sell their own spares at artificially inflated prices. If you buy a part from an Authorized Dealer, expect to pay LOTS more than the part is actually worth. Example: I needed a computer module for a little Mitsubishi truck. I knew that it was probably something like a $0.10 or $1 IC that was bad, and if I had a schematic, I could have fixed it for a couple of bucks. Mitsubishi, on the other hand, wanted $900 for a replacement module. I found a guy who repaired them, and he sold me one for $350 with a trade-in of my old module. This guy was costing Mitsubishi plenty of money (money that they figure in and count on as part of their business model), but he was doing absolutely nothing wrong or illegal.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    52. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 1

      Guns are a bad comparison because outlawing guns might protect people from being hurt. A lot of very reasonable people are perfectly willing to give up some of their personal right to bear arms if it might mean that fewer people will die.

      I do not own a gun, but I'm not willing to give up my constitutional right to bear one as I please (because if I give that up, what's next? free speech?).


      Mod chips do not harm any person. They might harm the bottom line of a corporation, and as I don't work for a console manufacturer, it's not really my responsibility to help ensure their future profitability.

      First off, piracy harms the game developer significantly more than the console's parent company (unless you're Sega, where you're both the console parent and one of the main game developers). Second, do you not realize there are people behind these companies? You can say that a mod chip won't harm any person, but you'd be wrong. You might say it won't harm them directly, but there is still harm. What's the difference between someone being shot with a gun and dieing, and someone losing their job because their smaller game development company couldn't profit in the face of piracy, ending up homeless on the streets, and dieing from disease, hunger, cold, or violence? Other than the amount of time between the action and the death, there isn't much difference (you may claim that death isn't certain in the modchip scenario, and I'll claim the exact same in the gun scenario -- death is not certain). Maybe that's being a little too sensationalist, but so is your argument about hammers. :)


      Incidentally, what is the difference between buying a mod chip and building your own? What do you feel separates the two, morally or legally or whatever way you want to look at it?

      Legally, I'm sure the DMCA prevents you from building your own chip. However, on an individual basis, I doubt they will care. My argument for allowing building but not selling is mostly ethical (I hesitate to use "moral", since it's a loaded word). If you're building your own modchip, it's simply you modifying some piece of equipment you already own. You're putting effort into it, which means few people are going to do it. If you then sell those modchips you're building, you're doing several things:

      1. You're profiting off of a circumvention device, which lands you in hot water legally.
      2. You're making it easy for other people to modify their XBoxes, which means more people will do it.
      3. More people means a higher percentage of the types that think, "Ooo! Free games!" and mod their consoles for the sole purpose of stealing games.

      In short, doing it yourself is localized, but once you start selling, things get hairy quickly.
    53. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by vicious_sloth · · Score: 1

      those who defend their free right to gnutella are not stealing other people's property, piracy and stealing are two different things. when you download pirated material you are not physically depriving anyone of anything ,except the the profit that would have been made if you actually bought that material. even then its not stealing becuase you didnt take it away from them, you denied it from them, which is still wrong, but its not stealing.

      --
      Sun is Warm, Grass is Green
    54. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

      I do not own a gun, but I'm not willing to give up my constitutional right to bear one as I please (because if I give that up, what's next? free speech?).

      This is the only part of your post I really didn't understand. You were the one who drew a comparison between mod chips and guns - wouldn't you therefore be forced, by your own assertions, to argue that a gun should only be legal if you build it yourself, and that people should not be allowed to SELL guns?

      The reason I disagree with the rest of your points is not because they're not good points, or not true, but because they are wildly speculative, and I do not believe that it is ok to create broad, important legal policy based on some ideas of the potential effect on developers' revenue streams. Even if there is a demonstrable effect that could be proven with numbers, I would STILL support the right of the mod chip manufacturers to do business. Frankly, I wouldn't feel at home in a capatalist system if I favored one type of enterprise over another to the demise of the loser.

      Mod chip manufacturers have jobs too, you know. Outlawing them will put them out of work as well, if you want to look at it that way.

    55. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by peu · · Score: 0

      So? I don't recall signing a piece of paper, when I bought my Xbox

      They put (as many others) some in the line of: By pressing the ON button you accept our EULA.

      IANAL, but I think this is crap

    56. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I'd prefer moral reasoning to legal reasoning. The laws are "owned".

      There has been one assertion made, which, if true, would support MicroSoft's position. It was asserted that the mod-chips were made using stolen (illegally copied) copyrighted code. True? False? I don't know. But that's been the only plausible justification offered. Nobody, however, either affirmed or denied that statement, and I'm not knowledgeable.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    57. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      This is more like manufacturing radar jammers, and I believe that really is illegal.

    58. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Osty · · Score: 1

      This is the only part of your post I really didn't understand. You were the one who drew a comparison between mod chips and guns - wouldn't you therefore be forced, by your own assertions, to argue that a gun should only be legal if you build it yourself, and that people should not be allowed to SELL guns?

      I owned up to being hypocritical on this point. What more do you want? Yes, I think people should be allowed to buy guns. No, I don't think people should be allowed to buy modchips. At the moment, in the US, guns are legal and modchips are not. So I support the status quo.


      Mod chip manufacturers have jobs too, you know. Outlawing them will put them out of work as well, if you want to look at it that way.

      s/Mod chip manufacturers/Drug dealers/. Whether you're for or against legalized drugs, it doesn't matter -- for the time being, dealing drugs is illegal (using drugs is also illegal, but in the privacy of your own home nobody's going to care unless you start dealing yourself). Some drugs may have some legal uses, and some people may even use those drugs legally, but a majority of drug users are not using those drugs for legal purposes. How's that for a scenario that is an exact match to the modchip scenario? Dealers and modchip sellers get shut down, users and modchip users are safe to use in the privacy of their own homes, and while there are legal uses for both drugs and modchips, most people using either are not doing so legally.

    59. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If zoning didn't exist, I'd have no problem with making mod chips illegal. Absolutely none. If their sole purpose was to play copied games, fine.

      Those aren't the only two options. If you can find a way to allow a legit user to play a backup of their legit game, and still block an illegal copy, then, and ONLY then, will I support making modchips illegal.

      I buy many games, and at over $50 EACH I am not going to be suckered into paying for the same game again, simply because someone ELSE doesn't appreciate the value of the game like I do. (cf: animals and children, mostly)

    60. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Lenolium · · Score: 1
      yes, yes, I know that some TVs do both PAL and NTSC, and some people speak multiple languages, or don't care about the language like for an action game, but those are definitely in the minority.
      Majority or minority doesn't matter. if a single person has the legal right to use a tool, there should be no law against that tool. Or would you rather we convict an innocent man just so it is easier to convict the guilty?
    61. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      And as such, all lynx/links users are THIEVES.

      When I visit a web page that someone has made public, exactly what obligation is on me to download and display EVERY external link listed in their HTML?

      Why, None! They made their page public, I can look at as little or as much of their site as they are willing to serve to me. It's not MY fault they opted to try supporting their site with a technique that just won't work. I am not required to view a page in it's entirety. Opera has a button for turning images off (like the good old days of netscape) - is this a 'piracy' button?

      If they'd rather support their site by charging users, well, that's their choice, and if I honestly NEED their site, I'll probably pay it.

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
    62. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in California and like Virgina or something.

    63. Re:This is not a shot at the end user by UncleFluffy · · Score: 2

      Shutting down mod chips does NOT mean you're unable to do what you want with your hardware. You can design and build your own mod chip, put it in there and go to town, no big deal. Or turn it into a toaster if you like. :)

      Can I contract my friend who knows more about electronics than I do to design and build the mod chip for me ?

      Can a group of people contract someone more knowledgeable to design and build the mod chip for them ?

      Can that someone more knowledgable offer this service to people ?

      Can a company offer this service to people ?

      I can't see as clear a black/white distinction as you apparently can.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

  18. I'm just curious... by Cutriss · · Score: 2

    Could NCSX be next? They don't sell modchips, but they do sell pre-modded systems for playing multi-region games. Far from hurting Microsoft, yes...but we know how nasty those lawyers get when they haven't had anything to do in a while...

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:I'm just curious... by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      My guess is, they WANT to shut it down, but they cannot, because they know their case will not stand.

      Console makers know very well that a modchip whose only function is to defeat region scams^H^H^Hhemes is completely legal.

      So somebody PLEASE make such chips. Lots of them. There ARE demands - and I love to see MS grinding their teeth and not able to do anything!

  19. Hate console makers (in a way) by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

    Man, if you buy a freaking console you might think that it actually belongs to you... WRONG! It appears that just like with software you just pay a one-time lease and don't have the right to do anything with it beyond what the producer thinks is ok? (Just like in the software sector it makes no sense to go after the individual, of course, so they just shut down large distributors.) Does this strike anyone else as wrong somehow? Or am I just an evil anti-corporate activist?

    1. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by anotherone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that the mod chip contains leaked code from the dev version of the x-box, which you didn't buy. They're basically selling pirated software. That's why MS is angry- what's on the chip, not the fact that there's a chip.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    2. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      Well but other console makers are shutting down mod sites, too, like Sony. Don't tell me all mod chips contain leaked code...

    3. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by dstone · · Score: 2

      That's why MS is angry- what's on the chip, not the fact that there's a chip.

      No, let's be honest: MS is angry that there is a chip. Plain and simple. Now, they are claiming that the chip contains leaked dev code, and that's how they hope to eliminate/reduce the chips being sold. If a law has been broken WRT copyright or confidentiality, then they have reason to pursue legal action. But I'm pretty sure they'll be pissed off that chips exist with or without stolen code.

      Even as legal, reverse-engineered chips exist, people will do two things that MS does not like:
      1) Buy a console and pirate games. The console is cheap (possibly subsidized) and MS sees reduced or no license revenues from these games.
      2) Buy a console and run it for non-gaming purposes altogether (eg, MP3 station, Linux box, etc.) Again, they end up selling a barely profitable console and MS sees no license revenues from game sales.

    4. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by anotherone · · Score: 2

      OK, but what's your point? The chip contains stolen data, and 90% of the people who buy it are going to use it to steal more data. Just because it can be used to install linux on the xbox doesn't mean that that's what people are going to use it for. I've never seen stats on it, but I would bet that most users with mod chips are just using them to steal games. Why should Microsoft tolerate that?

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    5. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all mod chips contain leaked or hacked code. That's what a mod chip is.

    6. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, wrong, (-1 shit for brains). the current xbox modchips do because they're bios-replacements.

    7. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by Lenolium · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what the numbers are. If there is a significant legal use for them (such as turning your XBox into a Ogg Vorbis playing set top box) they are legal. This is the same way that VCR's with the record button are legal, even though they may be used for illegal copying of copyrighted material (which is probably their primary use), having the ability to also copy your home movies gives them the legal right to exist and be sold.

    8. Re:Hate console makers (in a way) by dstone · · Score: 2

      OK, but what's your point?

      I believe my point was explained in my first sentence. In case it wasn't clear, I'll repeat it: MS hates the idea of any legal or illegal chip, and they're simply lucky that there's allegedly stolen code on this chip. If there was no stolen code, they'd still hate the chip yet they wouldn't have as much legal ground to shut down Lik Sang.

      90% of the people who buy it are going to use it to steal more data. Just because it can be used to install linux on the xbox doesn't mean that that's what people are going to use it for. ... I would bet that most users with mod chips are just using them to steal games.

      By your rationale, any hard drive over 10GB or so should be illegal and retailers and manufacturers associated with 60, 80, and 120GB+ drives should be shut down because 90% of them are using them to steal data. It's true, face it. MP3s and pirated software are what motivates the development and sale of big cheap IDE drives. To use your own wording: Why should software companies and recording artists tolerate the sale of cheap, massive hard drives?

      Let me answer that for you: Because we're all innocent until proven guilty. Let me buy my ice pick, my barbed wire, my big hard disks, and my non-copyrighted mod chips so I can develop original X-Box apps in my fortified arctic fortess, unless you can prove otherwise. Okay?

  20. Corporate Slogans by j_kenpo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, since I cant get my mod chips off Lik Sang, next time Microsoft asks me "Where do I want to go today?", Ill be sure to say "Hong Kong, so I can buy my mod chip"...

  21. In other news... by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Micro$oft has just announced the availability of the Monopoly game for the Xbox.

    --
    In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    1. Re:In other news... by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2
      You mean the game that some people think was copied from its original inventors and turned into private IP?

      I'm sure a company like MS would never do that... all their products are startlingly original compared to the state of the art when they were first cloned^h^h^h^h^h^hinnovated.

    2. Re:In other news... by Azathoth_lca · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean this?

    3. Re:In other news... by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      Hoo boy! Why am I not surprised?

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    4. Re:In other news... by jsse · · Score: 2

      Chance #173:

      You sell XBOx mod chips. Bastard. Go to jail immediately.

  22. Wake-up you dumb-ass American comsumers by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The chips typically allow a game machine to play legally and illegally copied discs, run unauthorized software and play game discs intended for other geographic regions.

    What the hell is "unauthorized software", when did Micro$haft get the right to tell me what LEGAL sw I can run on MY bought and paid for hardware.

    Wake-up you dumb-ass American comsumers your about to get the big one up your shaft!

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  23. MS was right on this one... by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Lik-Sang had the best stuff! You could buy Gameboy Advance Flash card from them. That allows you to put any NES games or GBA games on your Gameboy. SO illegal, but so fun! MOD chips for every system. It was a nice site with nice goodies, but this stuff was VERY not nice to the game companies!

  24. This is bad for a vast amount of people by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I used to order flash carts from lik-sang so I could write my own GBA/GBC applications. [re: I'm a software developer].

    Now that they don't exist I will have to find another supplier and go through the time to build up trust with them etc...

    These time of summary judgements are really shameful. At beast MS should have formed an injunction against them selling Xbox chips. The other stuff [e.g. GBA accessories] are not illegal nor "bad".

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes they are illegal. you are not a gba/gbc developer. you have a hobby. a real developer owns a flash card made by nintendo and has a developer license, which you don't have. you are 33 years old and living in your parent's basement. see the difference? and there are hundreds of sites that sell flashcards you dick face.

    2. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by TrollBridge · · Score: 0
      "Now that they don't exist I will have to find another supplier and go through the time to build up trust with them etc..."

      So then you should assign blame where it is most appropriate. Lik Sang made a poor decision, got caught, and will likely pay for their mistake.

      Unfortunately, their legitimate customer base will have to suffer as well, but that's what happens when companies make bad choices.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    3. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Actually I am a GBA developer, I just haven't released any licensed carts [yet].

      You're mixing up affiliation there. I'm also a x86 and win32 developer but I neither work for Intel or Microsoft.

      And for your information I am 20, in college, live in the 1st floor of my parents house.

      You "dick face poopy head!"

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weenie. REAL college students live in dorms.

    5. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      And REAL college students waste money on rent when they only really live 20 mins via bus from campus?

      Wow there is smarts. You've restored my faith in the average college students ability to reason.

      You're probably the type who also thinks a "good time" is out at a bar getting drunk with other self-absorbed idiots...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And REAL college students waste money on rent when they only really live 20 mins via bus from campus?

      Real college students value the freedom and privacy that comes from living out from under Mommy and Daddy's roof. But then, if you're happy living at home, good for you. Maybe your parents are really cool, or perhaps you don't need freedom or privacy and you know, there's nothing stopping you from living at home after you graduate and get a job either. Think of all the money you'll save and it sure as hell impresses the women!

    7. Re:This is bad for a vast amount of people by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ah the arrogance...

      Its not like I want to live at home but the lack of job and current college study kinda limits my options.

      Or would it be more noble to drop out of school, flip burgers just so I can live in some shithole and avoid the parents?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  25. Re:Other Asian manufacturers need to be shut down. by fialar · · Score: 2

    Voting with $$$ doesn't really work anyway. Microsoft has so much money it doesn't matter, besides, they use packs of lawyers to whittle away at what ever consumer freedoms we still have left.

    (Corporate lawyers have done a great job at destroying the United States' ability to revoke corporate charters since the end of the Civil War.)

  26. Game Gizmo still has 'em by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I used to order flash carts from lik-sang so I could write my own GBA/GBC applications.

    Game Gizmo still has GBA flash carts. I'm a developer too; unfortunately, my site is down because my ISP seems to have blocked incoming connections to my computer.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  27. You're kidding, right? by Quarters · · Score: 2

    Mod chips, legal issues aside, are one of the "value adds" of the console market.

    Please show me the #s. I seriously doubt that the vast majority of console buyers have even heard of mod-chips, let alone are interested in getting one.

    Consoles are commodity items purchased by people that aren't geeks, haven't read Slashdot, and probably don't have 3 Linux boxes in their home office.

    The infinitesimal percentage of XBOX owners that also purchased a mod chip doesn't come close to making a mod chip a "value add" for the console(ignoring your incorrect useage of that term).

    1. Re:You're kidding, right? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      it is value add to the people who want a mod chip.
      OTOH every console owner I know has heard of mod chips, and that includes people who are not nerds.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:You're kidding, right? by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      In America, maybe... but in my experience, Asia and Australia have high consumer awareness of modchips and piracy.

      It's really big in Australia. Being the only PAL area in Australasia with excellent connections to Asian countries, people get frustrated with having to wait for conversions of games to arrive. Some games don't arrive at all. (We probably get about 50-60% of all RPGs - PS, PS2, N64, GBA, Dreamcast- translated/released in the US, and as a complete console RPG freak I can tell you that is very painful indeed!) Once they realise they can get them quicker and cheaper (A$100 is a horrible psychological threshhold for a game, but that's where many are priced) it's pretty easy to justify a modchip and buying pirated games.

      That aside, I know plenty of people (myself included) who buy legitimate imported games. I know the games companies would rather we bought a console for each region, but do you know anyone with a DVD player for each region? I'd go buy a different console if I had that much money!

      Game region coding and DVD region coding are on par with each other, IMHO. You can potentially play pirated HK DVDs on a region-free player, but who's going to hunt who down over that one?

  28. Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want:

    To play games, get a game cube or ps2.
    To run linux, get a computer or PS2.

    If you want a big ugly black useless box get an XBOX.

    Xboxes are useless, they are just a crippled celeron pc.

  29. you sure about that? by martissimo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sony slaps PS2 chippers

    that doesnt read like they are somebody who "allows mod chips"

  30. Microsoft by Fenresulven · · Score: 1

    *We are Microsoft. Open your wallets and surrender your cash. We will add your biological and technological distinctivess to our own. You will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile. Where *YOU* want to go today, is irrelevant.*

    Not to mention what you want to mod today.

    1. Re:Microsoft by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

      how original

      --
      >
  31. Most consoles get chipped to play import games. by Thag · · Score: 2

    At least, in the group of people I know. I only know of one person out of the dozens of people I know who play video games who deals with pirated games a lot, and even then it's hard to say which games are pirates and which games are backup copies.

    Does the XBox have regional lockout like other consoles do?

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  32. Re:I don't care what you guys say by Kenja · · Score: 1

    So you spend the time and money to back up game DVDs? Sorry, I dont buy it. Its not cost effective to do that.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  33. MS was forced by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Ummmm....
    Here's my understanding of 'normal' economics.

    Playstation 2 drops price, GameCube drops price, suddenly XBOX is the expensive guy on the block.

    MS can now:-
    drop the price to try and gain market share.
    drop persueing a new market that it has no experiance in.
    Become a neich product and try better next time.

    Most normal companies would have to drop out of the market because they can't afford to keep up with the competition. MS isn't normal.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:MS was forced by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Most normal companies would have to drop out of the market because they can't afford to keep up with the competition. MS isn't normal."

      Actually, MS is 'perfectly normal'. They have invested a great deal of money into this, and they have 4 years to turn it around into a moneymaker. The worst case scenario is that they make the game market better for everybody. Oh no! Damn them!

    2. Re:MS was forced by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
      Agreed. MS has spent a lot of money on the xbox. They aren't just going to fold up because other companies lower the price on a competing product - that would give up too much of their investment. Check out what they would lose (from their financial highlights):

      Cost of revenue was $1.54 billion or 19.9% as a percent of revenue in the second quarter, compared to $864 million or 13.2% as a percent of revenue in the second quarter of the prior year. The launch of the Xbox video game console within the December quarter of 2002 drove the large majority of the increase from the prior year's comparable quarter.

      Research and development expenses in the second quarter increased 5% from the second quarter of the prior year to $1.04 billion. R&D expenses increased primarily due to higher Xbox and Windows XP headcount-related and product development costs associated with these new products. The discontinuation of goodwill amortization in accordance with SFAS 142 in fiscal 2002 partially offset the growth in headcount and development costs.

      Sales and marketing expenses were $1.48 billion in the December quarter, or 19.1% of revenue, compared to $1.29 billion in the second quarter of the prior year, or 19.7% of revenue. Sales and marketing expenses as a percent of revenue decreased primarily due to the large relative increase in revenue associated with the onset of Xbox revenue.

    3. Re:MS was forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Slashdot spelling bee award goes to....

      oliverthered

    4. Re:MS was forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it goes to Anonymous Coward you seem to give a fuck about shit like that.

  34. Nintendo v Lik Sang by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .. a couple years back, lik-sang had a similar run-in with nintendo over the N64 backup devices. They eventually got N to back off after they decided not to ship any units to North and Central America.

    Perhaps the same type of thing could happen with MSFT.

    Though I wonder if the mod in question, the PC-BIOXX/OpenXbox, counts as illegal. It is, in essence, a blank flashROM.

    You attach it to the xbox, and completely replace the xbox' bios with whatever you flash to the chip. So it could be used to run a hacked xbox bios that plays pirated code, it could be used to run the linux bios, or it could be used to run the retail bios (if the one on the mobo got fried).

    You could even use it on a PC mobo just as easily, if you wanted to play BIOS hacker. It's just a plain-vanilla 2mbit flashrom for the LPC header.

    I mean, is the device itself illegal just because it has some illegal use?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Nintendo v Lik Sang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of BUNG (bung.com.hk). After the lawsuit from nintendo, they went on for a while, but they too eventually died.

    2. Re:Nintendo v Lik Sang by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, I'm thinking about lik-sang.

      The Bung GB-Xchanger was one product they refused to ship to North America, the Dr. 64 N64 backup devices were another.

      Bung didn't die btw, they just changed their name.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Nintendo v Lik Sang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Bung's new name?

    4. Re:Nintendo v Lik Sang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What is Bung's new name?

      Hole. :)

    5. Re:Nintendo v Lik Sang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They eventually got N to back off after they decided not to ship any units to North and Central America.

      They could very well end up doing this, I was looking at a premodded PS2 on their site that they would only ship to Europe/Aust/NZ. On the other hand, it could simply be because it outputs in PAL so won't work properly on the NTSC-only TVs in the US/Canada. Yeah I know you can get a signal converter :)

  35. What about thier Afterburner Stuff? by Mishra2002 · · Score: 1

    I want to know is does anyone know how I can get one of the Lik-Sang gameboy covers that's already Pre-cut for the afterburner. I mean Lik -sang had plenty of legitimate things for sale(assuming a mod-chip is illegal, which is up for debate). I can see getting them to stop selling Mod Chips, But shutting down the company,? That's not right.

    -Mishra

    1. Re:What about thier Afterburner Stuff? by king+fancy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I pre-ordered one of those pre-cut GBA case fronts on Sept 17th, but I don't think Lik-Sang ever charged me. They were supposed to ship out tomorrow (Oct 4th). Hooray for Microsoft for making a legitimate, useful, rare commodity that posed no threat to it's plans for work domination impossible to find. We'll probably see them on EBay pretty soon for some ridiculous price.

      --
      "a little song, a little dance, a little selzer down your pants." -- space ghost
    2. Re:What about thier Afterburner Stuff? by Cybercifrado · · Score: 1

      www.tritonlabs.com is the original carrier of said GBA MOD.

    3. Re:What about thier Afterburner Stuff? by king+fancy · · Score: 1

      Tritonlabs makes the Afterburner, but Lik-Sang is the only place I've found that sells a pre-modified GBA case front that has all necessary cuts in place & dimmer dial.

      --
      "a little song, a little dance, a little selzer down your pants." -- space ghost
  36. No LikSang = No more GP32 Support ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...
    LikSang were a major distributer for the fledgling GP32.

    They are (were?) the only place for people like me, in the UK, to get the games at a decent price. I've bought £100's of item from them... rare DC games that aren't available here, a DC BBA, smart media readers... and the aforementioned GP32 and software.

    How the HELL can Microsoft shut down a company in another country?

    I tell you, this world is getting more f*cked up, day by day.

    -John

  37. Re:I don't care what you guys say by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
    lets see I can buy a dvdr for a couple of bucks, pop the origional in a mac and copy it while I make dinner/sleep/work. Its very cost effective, I spend a few minutes and and a few dollars. And I dont have to use the origionals.

    I started this when I bought a game (civ2) which got scratched a short time later and I was told tuff by the company (I dont think they should have to replace it but if they dont have to I should be able to back it up).

    --
  38. PC's are next by skajake · · Score: 1

    Imagine a day when it will be illegal to crack open a pc and ad an MPEG decoder. Unless it is sanctioned by Microsoft of course. Thats where this is headed folks.

    --

    ~ Maintainer of the Skajake Projects

  39. Re:I don't care what you guys say by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Go for it dude. Just figure out how to make your own mod chip and you can back up all the shit you want.

  40. Give your money to Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Screw MS. Seriously, Sony is a great evil much like MS but they are far more easy to tollerate. I don't see them trying to take over my computer and my TV. I've got linux on my playstation 2 and it works fabulously. No mod chip, nothing. Sony supports it. Play with the hardware, learn how to program the EE and the VUs.

    They're against piracy just the same. They aren't out to stop those who are tinkering though.

  41. Maybe I'm just being paranoid by Peachy · · Score: 1

    But xboxhacker.net also seems to be down. Coincindence or M$ ploy to wipe out all modchip sites?

  42. bribes by zoftie · · Score: 1

    I lived in USSR, and I know what bribes are. Because hongkong is part of china and china is highly corrupt , i would see no other way to pull such trick but by pay off some officals there, directly for shutting down of the site.

    What do we call that here? - Political campaign contributions.
    2c
    p

  43. Was M$ forced to design an expensive box? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft designed an expensive box. PS2 and GameCube were designed better. Economics, as you put it, would dictate that Microsoft start a new design and beat the competition.

    Detroit designed expensive to build cars and Japan beat them. Would you think it proper for Detroit to have shut down the Japanese car makers?

    1. Re:Was M$ forced to design an expensive box? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      ... except you're ignoring the fact that where this company comes from, US copyright doesn't apply. I suppose it's possible for MS to have copyrights there as well.

      If not, it's just a loophole. MS is fairly experienced in loopholes. It's just sickening that MS is so bloodthirsty in their business tactics. If this keeps happening, they'll be buying out IBM and the US Gov't outright within 10 years, and we'll be back to a monarchy...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Was M$ forced to design an expensive box? by raygundan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If they illegally copied, modified, and resold their copyright materials, yes."

      You are correct, sir.

      I do not know if the modchips contain copyrighted MS code. I suspect some do and some don't depending on the method used.

      If they do not, however, NO ONE is reselling copyrighted materials.

      Your example is slightly incorrect, too. There is no difference between what a reseller of mod-chipped xboxes is doing, and a reseller of modified cars, except that only an idiot would sell the reseller a car at a loss. How can you claim that "Company A" is keeping "all the profits?" when "Company B" has no profit to start with? If "Company B" has a poorly designed product that they can't manufacture at a low enough cost to keep up with their competition AND make a profit, why should the courts enforce their profits? Is it illegal to buy an xbox and then just leave it sitting around? Hardly. Yet that leaves MS in exactly the same money-losing situation as putting a mod chip in and using it for legal purposes.

      Pirating games is illegal. Building a modchip containing modified MS XBox BIOS code is illegal. Building a modchip that contains no MS code and using it to play a European game or make backups of your games is legal.

    3. Re:Was M$ forced to design an expensive box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you on about? American copyrights are perfectly valid in China/Hong Kong. The difficulty is that the Chinese authorities aren't overly concerned with spending their scarce law-enforcement resources on violations of copyright law (as opposed to theft, murder, etc.). Nevertheless, they did promise to do better during their push to join the WTO (and it looks like they're following through on that promise).

      This place (Slashdot) really is like the Twilight Zone. People repeat the same lies/misinformation to each other over and over again, and they all believe it.

    4. Re:Was M$ forced to design an expensive box? by DonGar · · Score: 1

      You forget the DMCA. Modchips are a means for bypassing the security of the device. Therefore they are illegal, REGARDLESS of the legality of why you are trying to accomplish.

      In effect, DMCA says that if a company adds security to a product (no matter how weak), they own that product, not you. Even if you're the one who paid for it. Sigh.

      However, that only applies in the US. Or does it? Maybe because they were selling the modchips to US customers they might be able to pursue in a US court.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
  44. Buy an XBox by luuc · · Score: 1

    Do you not like Microsoft? Then buy an XBox and use it with Linux or something, don't buy any games. If they're really making such a loss on the hardware itself... Just an idea.

    1. Re:Buy an XBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just don't buy MSFT products at all. There are plenty of alternatives. If you really oppose MSFT then sacrificing the purchase of a TOY like a game console shouldn't matter. Be glad the DRM battle is affecting entertainment first, since toys are dispensable.

  45. *GRUMBLE* by Goobah · · Score: 1

    This is my big question - Would Chevy shut me down if I made a mod kit to put a Ford engine in my Camaro? (This is hypothetical, of course, what nutbag would ever do that?)

    Perhaps, MAYBE, I can see them being a little upset at mods that allow you to run illegally copied games, but a lot of the MOD chips I've seen are so you can run other region's discs, and/or run an OS like linux. Why is this a crime? Maybe I'm just reading too superficially into the whole thing. It just irks me.

    1. Re:*GRUMBLE* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeeeeehaaw!

    2. Re:*GRUMBLE* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engine swaps between brands have been common for as long as cars have existed, but usually Chevy engines go into other cars since the small block is such a performance standard. Any company trying to change this would be instantly crucified by the auto enthusiast public and especially mechanics. Since the automobile business revenue model does not rely on or need EULAs, there is no reason to alter it and send customers rocketing to alternatives.
      If you piss off a car customer, they won't come back. If you piss off a gamer, craving overrides intelligence and they buy the hardware anyway, then vent on /. :P

  46. What ever happened to "Betamax Doctrine?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall correctly the MPAA tried to get Beta pulled from the shelves because you could copy movies. The courts ruled that just because a device has possible illegal uses, if it had legit uses, it was legal.
    Where did that concept go?
    Just because I can stab someone with a knife doesn't mean we should ban all knives. How would I eat steak?

  47. More B.S. from Bill... by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't want people to have the right to do what they wish with the products they buy.

    Yes, these modchips facilitate piracy. But they also have legitimate uses on every console they exist for. Not to mention that people should be able to use the modchip for "copied" games so long as those are backup copies.

    Lik Sang offered plenty of legitimate products for people who enjoy modding their consoles, tinkering, homebrew developmenet, etc. Of course, Microsoft doesn't want people to tinker and mod for ANY reason, because this undermines the next step in MS's business plan.

    Microsoft is trying very hard to establish a sense that you don't own your X-Box, but they do. With Palladium, they are going to extend that idea to the PC... you don't own your computer... MS does.

    Microsoft is going to use their money and power to take out any companies like Lik Sang in the future that give people the ability to mod their X-Box, or mod their PC's hardware after Palladium is released.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  48. Lock picks by Brad+Wilson · · Score: 1

    Actually, in some areas (even in the United States), it's illegal to have lock picking equipment in your posession without a permit. It is considered sufficient reason to arrest you on conspiracy to commit breaking and entering. Ditto for having a police scanner in a moving vehicle... some states outlaw it under the belief that it's a conspiracy to commit evasion.

    1. Re:Lock picks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very few areas though

      and thats only if you carry them with you, ie in your house, it is perfectly legal to have them.

      if you are walking around with them in your pocket, 2-3 states and i believe DC will charge you.

      i am not aware (aware being the keyword) of whether you HAVE to have a permit in any states to even own lockpicks.

      but then again, what defines a lock pick, bent paper clips? a baseball bat can make an efficient lock pick.

  49. there goes a "good" online retailer by fr0zen · · Score: 1

    geez just when i was about to get a mod from them, M$ had to pull off this stunt ...
    I guess there aint many online ecom/retailers like lik sang =(
    the rest is more of making a quick profit and offers little information like lan kwei, alot of fancy pictures and ridiculus pricing but not much of technical details =(

  50. Microsoft dictates how to hook up your stereo... by tenzig_112 · · Score: 2

    I hooked my CD player into my "Cassette" input on my receiver because my DAT machine is already hooked up there. Wouldn't ya know it, when the thing died a year later (within the warranty) the company said I'd violated the agreement I had tacitly signed by opening the shrinkwrap.

    Silly me. I guess they do have a right to defend their intellectual property. I mean, it's not as though I can configure something I bought whatever way I wish.

  51. Ambiguous my ass... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps no crimes are committed in the production or installation of them.

    Say I go buy a used '89 Chevy pickup from a used car dealership. Perfectly legal.

    There's a company in town called Classic Roadsters. They've produced a modded body for the '89 line of Chevy pickups that is very similar looking to a Hummer. Perfectly legal (the body shape doesn't breach any size requirements stipulated by the DOT).

    but consider that most users would utilize their modchip to play copied games or ROMs or Linux, etc.

    Now, say I took that modded truck, dressed myself into some army get-up, and drove onto the local army base, pretending to belong to the armed services (I don't). Now I'm doing something illegial.

    My point is this: the XBox is a piece of physical hardware. It can be patented. It cannot be licensed. Once I purchase an XBox (if I ever do), I will OWN it 100%. Nothing that Microsoft ever says or does can change that. If I want to take the bloody thing apart and turn it into a toaster oven, Microsoft can't do a thing about it.

    People have outfitted their cars for over 60 years now making them better. Say I had a beat-up Ford pickup that didn't work anymore, so I put in an engine from a Dodge pickup so I could get the Ford working again (please don't tell me if this is possible or not... I don't know, but it's all for the sake of argument). I don't think Dodge or Ford would complain. I'm sure you know someone who put a new stereo system into their car. They didn't have to buy a whole new car to get that stereo system they wanted. They put one into their own car so they could have better sound. People soup up their cars all the time specifically so that they don't have to buy a new car just to get the same features. It's perfectly legal to do so. It should be perfectly legal to do the same with consoles.

    Xbox is sold at a loss.Microsoft needs to sell games for the xbox in order to recoup the losses it incurs for every unit sold.

    Tough shit. Do you see Lincoln selling their Towncar at $9,999 brand new missing an air conditioner, and then selling air conditioners for $20,000 more? And on top of it all, making the Towncar so that no other AC would work in it except for Lincoln's own AC? Of course not! But this is what Microsoft is doing! Don't blame the customer for finding a better deal which is less profitable to Microsoft.

    1. Re:Ambiguous my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My point is this: the XBox is a piece of physical hardware. It can be patented. It cannot be licensed. Once I purchase an XBox (if I ever do), I will OWN it 100%. Nothing that Microsoft ever says or does can change that. If I want to take the bloody thing apart and turn it into a toaster oven, Microsoft can't do a thing about it.

      This brings insight of the road Microsoft is taking with Palladium: licensing hardware

      The XBox 2 won't be sold: it will be leased, and trust MS will use Palladium or any of its avatar to enforce the lic^H^Heasing contract.
  52. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Micosoft is only doing what comes natural to prey. Kill or be Killed

  53. This just fucking sucks. by zulux · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I can add a new cat-back exaust system to my car.

    I can add a new hard-drive to my computer.

    I can add an aftermarkt remote for my tv.

    I can add a network card to my PDA.

    I can add headphone to my stereo.

    I hope my sentiments express fully my displeasure:
    Microsoft, your unethacal employees, and your astro-turfers here on Slasdot: suck my dick and add me to your Foes. I don't need friends like you.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  54. It's not down now, so you're just paranoid (NT) by mmacdona86 · · Score: 2

    NT

    1. Re:It's not down now, so you're just paranoid (NT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run XboxHacker.Net

      I have not heard from Microsoft in months. But XboxHacker.Net has nothing to do with piracy and Microsoft knows it. I am sure they would contact me if they had concerns.

      SiliconIce

  55. Server Down? by viper21 · · Score: 2

    HAHAHA!

    This is too funny.

    Microsoft, exercising one of the many holes in IIS must have screwed their machines into oblivion.

    That would definately explain the server outage.

    I decree that this will now be known as the M$ Effect. A company exploiting their well known software vunlerabilities in order to screw the hell out of somebody that is pissing them off.

    -S

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. US customs stopping Lik-sang shippments.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me thats not an abuse of power. Guess M$ is flexing their nuts eh...

  58. Why don't you all show Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And release the code and methods for modding the Xbox, rather than selling it.

  59. For chrisssakes. by Cinnamon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never, ever post here, mostly because Slashdot is so packed nowadays it's probably already been said. But I feel compelled.

    All of you saying Microsoft has the right to do this:

    Are you all complete and utter retards? Does this really have to be explained to you anew each time something actions such as this (Not necessarily by Microsoft) has been taken?

    Let's try again, slowly for those of you who can't understand it.

    1) Although there aren't enough details available (That I've seen) to judge this particular instance, virtually every time a purveyor of products that let you change what you've legally purchased to do something else gets shut down it is NOT with actual legal action, it is with the THREAT of legal action. The sickening fact of all this isn't whether or not these entities are within their legal right to do this, but that the question is never asked. Lawsuits are so onerous that the mere threat of one is sufficient to stop what MAY BE legal. The crucial legal court test NEVER OCCURS.

    2) The 'slippery slope', while being largely a strawman argument, in cases like this is perhaps valid. If you don't think ANY hardware company is absolutely DROOLING at the prospect of extending it's reach far beyond the change of posession (purchase) of a product you're living in a fantasy world. Precendents such as this will of course start with a basis in what are apparently legal and moral positions, right now in the name of stopping piracy, but there is absolutely no reason to stop there. Once you've established the precedent of extending so-called 'rights' beyond the customer taking posession of your product you have infintely more control over what they can and cannot do, spanning legal and illegal uses.

    3) The fact that devices such as mod chips (And P2P networks, for that matter) have both legitimate and illegitimate uses is not just a side argument. It is important to realize that many freedoms enjoyed by Americans (And for that matter, citizens of many other countries) are freedoms that could be used for both legitimate and illegitimate purposes. Drawing comparisons between the use of mod chips and free speech is more than just hyperbole, it is an attempt to illustrate that once you start allowing the restriction of something based on it's (in this case potentially) illegal uses you are setting a very dangerous precedent, and one that because of the DMCA has criminal and not just civil ramifications.

    The DMCA is the bridge between a civil lawsuit brought by Microsoft and someone going to jail for making or using something that could be used to violate IP 'rights'. If you still don't believe me, ask yourself why they need the DMCA then? Why was it necessary for the government to enact legislation that allows companies and the government to take punitive actions against those who violate IP, or more accurately those who MAKE things that COULD be used to violate IP, rather than stick with civil proceedings? (Even the threat of which, I might add, seem to work just fine.) In other words, if you're going to say no one's going to get sent to jail for this, why is there a law that says you will? Do you honestly think that mod chip makers should go to jail?

    4) Microsoft's choice to sell their products (X-box) at a loss does not automatically give them the legal right to take any and all action they see fit to try and make money through other means, in this case through game licenses. It's been said time and again but you still don't seem to get it, just because somebody WANTS to make money doesn't mean they GET to. It's very possible that their choice to try and pursue this method of profit is foolish and could result in failure due to the boxes being modded for uses besides purchasing the products they do make money on, but because of point (1) we may never know. By using the threat of legal action they may have secured a business model that is unavailable to other companies without as deep pockets. Do you think Microsoft would have succeeded in beating down Lik Sang if Microsoft were a small startup? (Not that X-box's major competitors, such as Sony, are small startups.) No. They can do this because of point (1), and because other companies realize the law being on their side (perhaps) is a moot point. In this case, Might Makes Right.

    I hope this explains a bit to those of you comparing modding your X-Box to rolling your odometer back on your car (boggle) or simply accusing posters of being Microsoft/other large coporate entity bashers. It IS about essential rights, albeit indirectly, whether you choose to believe ir ot not.

    --
    -- If we were in any other industry they would've shot us a long time ago.
    1. Re:For chrisssakes. by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      Wow.. damn good first post. I totally agree with you. I can't believe how idiotic people get about 'piracy'..

      What used to be fair use is ALL piracy now! That's a right we're giving up, people!

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    2. Re:For chrisssakes. by mpe · · Score: 2

      Although there aren't enough details available (That I've seen) to judge this particular instance, virtually every time a purveyor of products that let you change what you've legally purchased to do something else gets shut down it is NOT with actual legal action, it is with the THREAT of legal action. The sickening fact of all this isn't whether or not these entities are within their legal right to do this, but that the question is never asked . Lawsuits are so onerous that the mere threat of one is sufficient to stop what MAY BE legal. The crucial legal court test NEVER OCCURS.

      Quite likely the plaintiff never actually wants the case to be brought to court. Just to spin out the case long enough, including with having hearings about hearings, that the defendent will run out of money.

      The fact that devices such as mod chips (And P2P networks, for that matter) have both legitimate and illegitimate uses is not just a side argument . It is important to realize that many freedoms enjoyed by Americans (And for that matter, citizens of many other countries) are freedoms that could be used for both legitimate and illegitimate purposes.

      Just about any tool or machine ever developed can be used for "legitimate" and "illegitimate" purposes. Sometimes the only difference between the two is political whim. Well though out laws address actions, rather than the tools or methods used.

  60. Unauthorized ?!# by PrimeNumber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The chips typically allow a game machine to play legally and illegally copied discs, run unauthorized software and play game discs intended for other geographic regions.

    Unauthorized by who?

    1. Re:Unauthorized ?!# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      no,

      Unauthorized by WHOM?

      Thank you, that is all.

    2. Re:Unauthorized ?!# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no,

      Thank you ; that is all.

    3. Re:Unauthorized ?!# by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Makes it sound like there's a list or something...

    4. Re:Unauthorized ?!# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no,

      thank you is a phrase. I thank you; come again.

  61. Repeat after me: by raygundan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "There is no right to profit."
    "There is no right to profit."
    "There is no right to profit."

  62. Xbox Mod Chip Legal Opinion - Are they illegal? by mantispraying · · Score: 1

    Xbox Modchips For Copying Games - Check out the legal opinion posted here on the legality of xbox mod chips. There are some very interesting arguments posted. It looks like these guys have done some due diligence.

    1. Re:Xbox Mod Chip Legal Opinion - Are they illegal? by matlokheed · · Score: 1
      After reading that page, I'd come to the opposite conclusion that they come to:

      1) Microsoft is now actively pursuing modchip makers. That's not a valid argument anyway. Just because someone doesn't crack down, doesn't make it not illegal.

      2) Modchips are used primarily for homebrew applications. While XBox Linux is popular, I think this web page (which sells mod-chips BTW), is deluding itself. The games are the reason for modding. Most people could care less about XBox Linux. Free games is a horse of a different color.

      3) Fair use is valid, but against M$ lawyers... I wouldn't lean to hard on that.

      It all comes down to the important part. Tools are not illegal. A hammer, a computer, a gun, all can be used to commit an illegal act. Why are modchips somehow illegal then?

      --

      "If the good lord had intended us to walk, he wouldn't have invented roller skates." -Willy Wonka

    2. Re:Xbox Mod Chip Legal Opinion - Are they illegal? by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1

      This opinion was not as in depth as I would like to see, but at least it's a start.

      My first glance thoughts are that it needs a section to analyze the X-box EULA. While I expect that M$ can do nothing much if one modifies their X-box and uses it in their abode, the EULA could conceivable contain restrictions against modifying the box and profiting from it, such as by having it in an Internet cafe or whatnot. This would be similar to the situation in the ProCD v. Zeidenberg case which upheld a shrinkwrap license when Zeidenberg made the contents publically available. If the EULA did have such restrictions, then an action against the perpetrators would lie (i.e. would not be dismissed). I don't have an X-box, so maybe this analysis would be moot in view of the actual EULA.

    3. Re:Xbox Mod Chip Legal Opinion - Are they illegal? by mantispraying · · Score: 1

      Very good reply bezuwork! Indeed, the opinion could use a great deal of expansion, but it's all I could find on Google :) -- The ProCD v. Zeidenberg case is a very interesting case. The issue in that case is really more about contract formation than anything else. It's a case that every 1L law student studies. The EULA is a very interesting issue. It's the contract that is formulated when you buy any software, including xbox games. I don't think that Microsoft's EULA provision that prohibits backing up games will hold up in court. I really don't. It hasn't been challenged yet, but the very premise of the contract seems flawed. Fair use is a powerful legal provision. I would love to expand on this, but I have to run. I may reply in further detail when I have time to offer a more in depth analysis. I would like to hear more of your thoughts.

  63. Corrected Haiku.... by Tsali · · Score: 1

    (I was wondering when someone would notice...)

    corrected haiku

    add architecture
    without the great borg's consent?
    enlist the lawyers.

    \corrected haiku

    --
    This space for rent.
  64. You are a liar --- see a few posts up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple posts up you just said you did and that you backup everthing you own. Which is it? Do you or don't you or are you just a liar who is trying to score that all important Karma.

    1. Re:You are a liar --- see a few posts up by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      What the hell are you talking about.

      I back up everything I own, however backing up a PS2 game then requires me to use a mod chip to play the backup (I never use the origional).

      --
  65. Fuck you M$ by t0qer · · Score: 2

    Mod me down all you want, somebody had to say it. (Caresses his lik-sang GBA flash cart)

  66. news to me by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

    The way it looks by http://www.lik-sang.com/downtime.phtml , They just have downtime problems.

    This MS "shutdown scare" is just propaganda, as it sure-as-hell seems they aren't dead. By the way, I found this through google cache and noticed a working link on the new server.

    THEY'RE REALLY UP. Give them time!

  67. Re:Buisiness model by stephenisu · · Score: 1

    Your absolutely right... The console market is running on an outdated buisiness model. I propose that console makers should sell their consoles at a profit. Consumers will obviously choose the best console system blindly and at a price of $450+ dollars. Who needs to build a following anyways right? Parents really don't care about an upfront cost when buying a console for their kids. I know my parents would love to spend that much every holiday season...

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  68. Decoder? by Malc · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it be "encoder"? Surely it's up to the receiver/amp to do the decoding?

  69. DevKit BIOS by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    The BOIS being used is a leaked copy from the XBox Devkit. A clear violation of copyright (and the contract between MS and said developer). As an XBox owner you do own a license to use the BIOS in your XBox. You do not, however, have a kicense to use the BIOS from a devkit.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:DevKit BIOS by kasperd · · Score: 2

      The BOIS being used is a leaked copy from the XBox Devkit.

      That wasn't mentioned in the previous comment, it obviously changes the situation. Now that it is a copy of some software which you haven't legally purchased, I believe it is indeed a copyright infringement.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  70. M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$?

    1. Re:M$ by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Funny cartoon, point taken..

      --
  71. Modern Ownership by clovis · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Borrowed from John McL.
    :
    Originally, proletaries were the class of
    inhabitants of the Roman Empire
    who did not serve the Impirium by
    creative works or by other service,
    but through their careless reproductive
    habits. The word derives from the
    Latin _proles_, offspring, and the word
    proletariat literally means
    "those with many offspring."

    Ancient Rome was a slave society with
    three slaves to every citizen, according to the
    Tiberian Census of CE 30 or so, depending
    upon the calendar you prefer.
    The machinery of the Empire was literally
    activated by human muscle, the battleships
    of the Roman Navy being powered
    by slaves and the very skeins of hair that
    stored energy for the imperial _ballistae_
    (artillery) grown on slaves fed for the purpose.
    The slaves powering the Empire were derived from
    conquered peoples and especially from the
    nameless proletary class.

    In modern times, the nearest equivalent
    would be those who serve the corporate State
    not through creative works, but through
    the consumption of things they are
    instructed to purchase by the media of
    public information, and by their exposure of
    their children to the advertisers of such things.

  72. Re: what strategy? by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    With the exception of the Gamecube, Nintendo consoles have always sold at a profit. Nintendo expects to eventually realize a profit on the Gamecube hardware after depreciation of R&D and increases in production efficiency decrease the cost per unit manufactured. If you don't believe me, peruse Nintendo shareholder reports and read Gord's infamous column concerning how with the X-Box, Microsoft appeared to be deadset in repeating most of Sega's mistakes with the Dreamcast.

    If you look at the history of gaming consoles, for the most part only consoles that were about to tank ended up being sold at a loss. A good example is Sega. Who sold several consoles at a loss before bailing out of the hardware business.

  73. Incredible !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a great action. Compliments to MS, every day better to the destruction... They have touch one of the more clear face on the ModChips area. The more "clean" end-user reseller i know for my long time experience as console repair technician. To sue a company that pay 80% of the cost of a product to forward it in single piece also in Zambia if necessary, is great. I believe they sold in total 800 pieces of Xbox-modchips until now to end-user, they work only to end-users, so their volumes are very small. Lik-Sang, offer the state of the art technology on the Videogame Industry from time to time, this include sometime wrong items purchsed from third party. Is not of justice this action. To sue a small dot(one of the more clean), to gain attention is not right. Micro$oft is worry? To lost some penny in wall street? I simply realized there is none at the head of this Company, i look at them from long time... This is my feelings. MS is Strange... Any analist can understand this. All the news they control are only "fakes" to earn Money in WallSteet from Stupid Investors. MS is only a Machine to earn Money in Wallstreet, there is no-consistency of products, no head. Tons of "fakes" dayly to earn more. Peoples will understand this one day or another. I never wrong on my prediction also in 10 years of distance. Micro$oft will be in Collapse status soon, and big part of the investors will escape. They simply have nothing to do to fight the assigned Destiny, not from one people, but from many million of peoples... No money can buy and control the "real politics" and "the real things", group of peoples assign values to things, now in my opinion, MS is each day that pass, a currency that have less and less value. I want to suggest now, to who want run LINUX on Xbox to buy a Lindows machine preinstalled on wallmart.com, this is cheaper than a full Xbox and do not need installed chips to run standard PC & LINUX software...

  74. to all you people who like to rag on MS by claude_juan · · Score: 0, Troll

    ok, so MS may not be the most popular of the bunch, but i get the feeling that most of the resentment is about MS and not the actual issue. with that in mind, i point you to...

    http://www.actsofgord.com/Annoy/chapter07.html

    you see. if you want a mod chip to play stolen/copied games, you hurt the gaming business in general. so chill out about it and realize that your dishonesty is wrong!

  75. It's NOT a simple case of copyright infringement ! by mantispraying · · Score: 1

    Xbox Mod Chips for Copying Games Based on what's posted here, I'm not so sure it's a simple case of copyright infringement. This post doesn't address the actual bios argument, but there are other legal opinions posted here on the legality of xbox mod chips. There are some very interesting arguments posted. It looks like these guys have done some due diligence.

  76. It has to be SUBSTANTIAL non-infringing use by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Where did [the concept of substantial non-infringing use] go?

    Non-infringing use is not always substantial. For instance, Napster had a non-infringing use, but seeing as how over 90% of napster users shared files that they didn't have the right to share, such non-infringing use was not substantial.

    Besides, the DMCA that's currently on the books doesn't always allow for even substantial non-infringing uses.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  77. What...? by dachshund · · Score: 2
    Playstation 2 drops price, GameCube drops price, suddenly XBOX is the expensive guy on the block. MS was forced to drop price to keep up. It's called competition.

    Microsoft may be in a disadvantageous economic situation, but since when does copyright law have anything to do with protecting companies from bad pricing situations?

    If I run a pizza parlour, and the guy across the street is pricing me out of business, it would sure be nice if the cops showed up and put him out of business. That doesn't make it right for me to anonymously accuse him of running a drug ring.

  78. Standardized "Game Box" Hardware Needed by tucay · · Score: 0

    This all really indicates that we need some standardized "Game Box" hardware. Standardization is what spawned the PC revolution. I think the same can happen in a Game Box / Set-top Box device. Then we don't have to worry about proprietary standards from MS and Sony.

    The box could come with basic software but have a new OS changed by simply changing the compact flash card.

    The following features could be supported:

    hardware:

    -low power requirements
    - x86 with enough power to play Divx and DVD
    - DVD/CDR player
    - two or more game pads
    - remote control unit
    - wireless keyboard
    - wireless mouse
    - ethernet or 802.11
    - CF Card for OS boot so it can be easily upgraded by non tech people

    Software:

    - TV Tuner
    - TV Recorder
    - DVD Playback
    - CD Audio Playback with CDDB lookup
    - Divx Playback
    - MP3 Playback
    - OGG Playback
    - SNES Emulator
    - PS2 Emulator

    1. Re:Standardized "Game Box" Hardware Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A genie appears and grants your wish!

      Via EPIA-M9000 (available in the next two weeks)
      http://www.mini-itx.com

      Review at: http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/viaedenepia500 0/

  79. DVD-R doesn't work for dual-layer game discs by yerricde · · Score: 2

    pop the origional in a mac and copy it while I make dinner/sleep/work.

    Not if the original is dual-layer. Some PS2 games and all Xbox and GameCube games are dual-layer, or at least recorded on the second layer if single-layer. (The spiral on the second layer goes inward rather than outward.) DVD-R discs have only a first layer.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  80. Money talks by Windcatcher · · Score: 1

    I don't own a modchip. I don't even own an XBox. But this really makes me mad. Next will Ford be going after Edelbrock, Bosch, Fram, or other third-party manufacturers? Of course not, because thie whole thing is LUDICROUS. Some companies are under the DELUSION that computer equipment is somehow different than every other freaking industry on the planet. It's not. You plunk down $200, whether for an XBox, a VCR, or an intake manifold, IT'S YOURS. Install it, and at worst you VOID YOUR WARRANTY. Period.

    /rant on
    Mr. Gates! Yes, you! Why do you think I spent an extra $1600 to buy an extra laptop, for the SOLE purpose of learning how to use Linux? Can't you take a friggin hint? Wake up pal, because your company is dead to me. My dollars are going to YOUR COMPETITORS.
    /rant off

  81. console mods like sat mods? by phorm · · Score: 2

    If this turns out anything like the satellite-received modifying industry, chances are MS will never catch *everybody* and it will become somewhat of an long and tedius battle over time.

    The satellite-mod industry may be a bad example though, I know people who have paid tons more for a modified received than they would have actually paying for the channels themselves (though at the moment, we can't get American sat legally in Canada, or at least not here).

  82. Re:Just don't buy the Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck em. I like PS2 just fine, and I can find new and used games for it.

    Americans tinker with their toys. Deny that ability through egineering or legal threat, and we will find something else to play with.

  83. Why Microsoft does this - Lost in the noise by AAAWalrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People have established that Microsoft isn't attacking hackers directly. If you want to open up your xbox and piss on the circuits, BillyBorg can't stop you. If you manufacture and sell commercially a means to circumvent or alter their code, they can. The real question is, why?

    Basically, MS could care less about someone making money doing this. What they really care about is what this enables. A commercial outfit, manufacturing and selling components *enables* virtually all people to purchase xboxes with the *intent* of using them for alternate purposes. If they leave hack-shops unchecked for long, they have basically allowed a competing market to develop against what they really want to sell - games and service.

    If I want to purchase an xbox because I want to mod it AND I know I can just buy a chip online with ease, Microsoft would rather not sell me the xbox in the first place. Since they can't discriminate against buyers, they can make it more difficult for me to purchase a chip. Microsoft is not targetting the hardcore hackers. If you want to hack an xbox that badly and you have the skills, you'll do it. Who they *are* targetting is the average Joe Sixpack who buys an xbox. If he buys it and later sees he can easily purchase and install a mod to do things like play pirated games or run a webserver, Microsoft has just lost marketshare in the market that counts.

    THAT's what they are trying to stop. Not hacking, but the widespread usage of manufactured mods by average users.

  84. So what? by The+Bungi · · Score: 0
    I'd argue that Microsoft has a right to do this, and that the actual number of people they're affecting with this move is insignificant. This is an appliance folks, much like a VCR or a toaster. How many XBox users are running Linux on their appliances or buying mod chips? I suspect not very many.

    But in any case, this is pointless. I can buy a PS2 with a pirate mod chip in Mexico City for $100. Pirated games are $4 a pop. Microsoft can only go after the high-profile ones but they can't completely choke off piracy. Just like Sony can't, either.

    There will be other people in other countries that can and will do this sort of thing and there's nothing anyone can do to stop them. When you get big enough, of course, expect the BSA or whatever to come knocking on the door. Duh.

    1. Re:So what? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Since when does Black & Decker get to say what the hell I do with my toaster (oven)?

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:So what? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      That depends. When did you start listening to Black & Decker?

      Read my post again.

    3. Re:So what? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      I don't, nor do I listen to Microsoft.

      You seem to have missed the point.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    4. Re:So what? by nagora · · Score: 2
      This is an appliance folks, much like a VCR or a toaster.

      Exactly: why should MS be allowed to tell you what you can do with YOUR applicance any more than a toaster maker can?

      "Opening case may invalidate the warranty" is where MS's rights end in this case.

      Kill them all, that's what I say.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    5. Re:So what? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Exactly: why should MS be allowed to tell you what you can do with YOUR applicance any more than a toaster maker can?

      Sigh. They can't. Do you listen to the fucking toaster manufacturer? No. Do you listen to Microsoft? Nope. They can bitch and moan all they like, and they can go after a few big mod chip marketers, and how does that make a difference? Do you honestly think this is the end of the modchip-for-Xbox market? I sure as hell don't.

      "Opening case may invalidate the warranty" is where MS's rights end in this case.

      Exactly. But there's a flip side here - if you want to go online with XBox Live (once they finally get it off the goddamn ground), you'll be screwed. Just like you were screwed if you wanted to play online with a cracked copy of Command & Conquer. That is where they can fuck you.

      The other thing to consider of course is that Microsoft is not doing this just because they're bored - they have a responsibility to the companies that make games for their console. Want us to write games for the XBox? Then make it harder to pirate the damn thing. So while we're all bitching at The Evil Empire we might as well attack the game makers. I mean, god forbid they make any money!

      Kill them all, that's what I say.

      Thanks for your insight.

    6. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How many XBox users are running Linux on their appliances or buying mod chips? I suspect not very many.



      Not many, so it cannot be important.



      How many people exercise their right to free speech to say something really significant?



      Not many, so... screw them.

    7. Re:So what? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Since when does Black & Decker get to say what the hell I do with my toaster (oven)?

      Since they invalidated your warranty for baking PCBs in there? :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:So what? by nagora · · Score: 2
      They can bitch and moan all they like, and they can go after a few big mod chip marketers, and how does that make a difference?

      Would you suggest that the chip makers just "don't listen" to MS when they come ofter them? Do you think it would help them? I sure as hell don't.

      The other thing to consider of course is that Microsoft is not doing this just because they're bored - they have a responsibility to the companies that make games for their console.

      Like MS gives a toss about other companies. The only interest they have in the X-box is to make the X-box2 a platform for DRM; that's why they're so keen on stamping out mod chips: they're posturing to the guys in Hollywood that they can be trusted to keep user's sticky fingers out of their product when the time comes.

      Kill them all, that's what I say.

      Thanks for your insight.

      It's the only language they understand.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    9. Re:So what? by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Would you suggest that the chip makers just "don't listen" to MS when they come ofter them? Do you think it would help them? I sure as hell don't.

      Your understanding of the realities of this world is frighteningly obtuse.

      Like MS gives a toss about other companies. The only interest they have in the X-box is to make the X-box2 a platform for DRM; that's why they're so keen on stamping out mod chips: they're posturing to the guys in Hollywood that they can be trusted to keep user's sticky fingers out of their product when the time comes.

      You might want to try to pull your head out of your ass, get off the zealot train and look around. It helps sometimes.

      It's the only language they understand.

      Let me know when you're finished with them. Bring your BFG2000. I'm sure there will be blood and gore and all that.

  85. Re:Reprisal by filmcritic · · Score: 2, Funny

    the above post has been submitted to the FBI for determining possible action against the poster

  86. Even if it were illegal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a long way from making it illegal to modify your odometer to making it illegal to sell the tools to do so.

  87. MSNBC...news.com... by Schnapple · · Score: 2

    FYI, The reason that the story is the same for MSNBC and news.com is that MSNBC has a utility you can download which can give you headline alerts - big stories from MSNBC, tech stories from C|Net, etc. When you get a C|Net story the site you get directed to is msnbc-cnet.com.com, which is the same site as news.com.com with a different URL. When you go anywhere else on the C|Net site you're still on msnbc-cnet.com.com, so the site isn't really MSNBC at all, it's just a way to see who came from the utility.

  88. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  89. Microsoft's evil, blah blah blah... by Jayde+Stargunner · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's a lot of "This is typical of M$", "Antitrust ... etc.", and "This just goes to show they have too much power," going around.

    BS. Plain and simple.

    This is STANDARD industry practice. Do some research before you start going off on a big rant about how evil MS is. (Which may be true, but not because of this. lol)

    Sony has sued or threatened to sue just about EVERY SINGLE mod-chip maker and retailer during the last year. They have threatened and/or sued installers and resellers of mod chips, as well as sued the mod chip makers into the ground multiple times.

    Nintendo isn't much better. But Sony has been hyper-aggresive about this. I have friends in Germany who run a console modding business, yet refuse to do anything related to the PS2 due to Sony's legal threats to them.

    This is not a Microsoft thing. It is a console thing. That's all there is to it.

    -Jayde

    --
    What's a sig?
  90. why use an xbox for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i always thought most linux users hate microsoft so why the hell would they buy an xbox to run linux??

    1. Re:why use an xbox for linux by ccgr · · Score: 1

      Because it's a fast compuer for $200. It just so happens to run Linux too. :)

      --
      http://www.bookforce.net
  91. Bad assumption by werdna · · Score: 2

    I don't give a darn WHAT the EULA says. EULA isn't exactly a strong legal document

    Of course the phrase "strong legal document" isn't particularly refined, so we could quibble about your menaing. But if you mean that a EULA isn't generally enforceable, and if legal obligations and rights aren't affected thereby, you haven't been reading the case reporters lately (or, really, for the past few years).

    Particularly after the 7th Circuit ProCD case and the more recent Bowers decision out of the Federal Circuit, statements like the above are, at best, naive.

    1. Re:Bad assumption by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      I don't give a darn WHAT the EULA says.

      What EULA?

      I'm looking through my Xbox manual right now, and there's no steenking EULA! It was one of the main things I looked for when I unpackaged the thing.

      There's the usual disclaimer of any and all liability whatsoever, there are multiple warnings about the danger of electrocution from electronic equipment, a warning about the danger of contacting energized parts inside the Xbox, a warning against sticking foriegn objects theough the ventilation holes, a warning about the danger of disassembling the Xbox, a warning against attempting to repair the Xbox, a safety warning against modifying the Xbox in any way, a warning about the danger of the Xbox falling on somebody and injuring them, a warning about the danger of blocking the ventilation slots and letting it get too hot, a warning against placing containers filled with liquids atop the Xbox, a warning about the possible seizure danger associated with flashing lights, a warning about sitting hunched over some game until your muscles & bones ache, a warning about "MusculoSkeletal Disorders" including "carpal tunnel syndrome" (one I'd probably better heed, the damn controller left my left hand useless after a mere 20-hour MotoGP session), a warning about burning a static pattern into your projection TV, no doubt other warnings that I've missed, and even a 90-day warranty, complete with provisions which void it if the Xbox is modified.

      There's a copyright notice on the back that admonishes me against copying the manual in whole or in part, and a paragraph that sounds like a copyright notice for imbedded Macrovision IP which forbids disassembly or RE of that.

      But I can find no M$ "software" EULA. I don't recall seeing one in its startup sequence either. Maybe they left it out of my box?

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  92. Whining counts for nothing by werdna · · Score: 2

    The only votes that matter here are thouse you make with your pocketbook and your feet.

    If you find Microsoft's products and policies, particularly XBOX, offensive, don't buy them. I have no idea whether or not Hong Kong law permits this action to be taken, but it doesn't really matter. At the end of the day, if a proprietary locked-down box doesn't do it for you, say so -- FOR REAL -- and buy a box from their competitors instead.

  93. Brave Soul Among the Foot Stompers by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're a brave soul to toss an adult opinion into this den of pubescent hormones. You'll be castigated as if you were pulling the rug out from under Peter Pan and all the little children in NeverNever Land. If you are really lucky, you might attract a nibble from an otherwise coherent grownup who happens to think that open source/free software is a philosophy capable of running the world, rather than an alternative software development model.

    Mostly, though, what goes on here is just a bunch of metaphoric foot stomping. E.g.: MS, the DMCA, and the RIAA are all evil. Someone should do something. But not me. I still need to buy my games and my music. Still gotta be a trained consumer doing what I'm supposed to do. Me, me me; mine mine, mine

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Brave Soul Among the Foot Stompers by MaxVolume · · Score: 0

      Should this be modded to Off-tropic?

  94. What did you really buy? by why-is-it · · Score: 2

    Because once they sell you the product, they have no legal rights to it anymore.

    We used to be able to buy software and music, but now we just buy a license to be able to use the software / music.

    I wonder how long it will be before someone tries that with durable consumer goods? It is sort of like that with leasing a car - you don't own it, you just have the right to use it for a certain period of time...

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  95. Then why is MS so paranoid...?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Mass majority of gamers never heard of a MOD Chip, then why oh why would Microsoft, the company with enough bad press already, be going after small frys like Lik-sang, Who sell their games, their systems, and accessories.

    The infinitesimal percentage of owners have Microsoft worried about something.

    A.C.

  96. Time to boycott Microsoft! by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    Let's educate the public and let them now why
    we use mod chips! It's not to steal. It's so we
    can develop and use our own games, instead of paying thousands of dollars for an official development kit, mod chips allow us to use Linux to
    develop games.

    MICROSOFT IS EVIL! BOYCOTT MICROSOFT!

  97. link to xbox mod chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here is a link to xbox mod chips

    http://www.consultorlinux.com

    lets hope ms does not shut down all sites with mod chips.

  98. redneck riceboys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if ford could get rid of the trucks 2" off the ground slow ass drivers with neon and bass pouring out that rattles the rust in the 1/4 panels it's a small price to pay...

  99. DOJ antitrust chief resigns by dcgaber · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI, it was announced today that Charles James, current head of AntiTrust division at DoJ, and who crafted the sell-out settlement, is resigning to become Cheveron's general counsel. Article is here.

  100. Why No Support for a Linux Game Industry? by reallocate · · Score: 2

    If games are so bloody important to so many people who loathe Microsoft, how come there isn't a viable Linux game industry?

    Any chance some people hate paying for games more than they hate MS?

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  101. EULA might not be strong, but the DMCA is... by jbuilder · · Score: 2

    And the DMCA can be invoked here. The XBox is a patented device, and the DMCA was designed specifcally to stop hacking of patented systems. Don't like it, that's fine, but the Ford analogy isn't quite valid here.

    Lik Sang is done - at least for now.

    --
    Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
  102. The don't buy it by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 1

    Although it's a very cool idea to install Linux on a Microsoft console, why get all bothered by it when Microsoft cries foul? Go buy a PS2 or GameCube. PS2 already has Linux for its console. Besides from what I've been reading, Xbox isn't doing to good in the "videogame console wars". I seriously believe that Xbox will go the way of the Atari Jaguar or Sega CD.

    --


    -Dipster
  103. Hah! That'll show the Chinese!! by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2

    I can see it now, Lik-Sang's homepage, obviously hacked by Microsoft... "Hacked by Borgese"

    (in case you don't get the joke, Borg == M$, and some Chinese hacker defaced a lot of web pages with the text "Hacked by Chinese)

    --pi

  104. This fluff gets a +5? by cybrthng · · Score: 2
    If you modded your dreamcast you totally wasted your time--the thing could play ISOs out of the box.

    I got my dreamcast long before the "Boot Disk" came out, and to play jap games i needed a region selectable mod chip.


    If you thing Sony and Nintendo didn't have the cash to shutdown Lik-Sang, well, there's a second reason for me to think you're an idiot.

    You can think whatever you want. These companies have vastly less R&D money and legal funding then Microsoft Does. Like i said in my original statements Nintendo chose an uncommon media format, and Sony chose to sell a linux kit. Neither company supports mod chipping and for all intents and purposes it always invalidates your warranty and support. That my friend, is idiotic.

    They didn't shutdown Lik-Sang because they realized people don't like soldering crap to their expensive consoles, and there really wasn't a big effect on piracy here. Microsoft just went after them because they're obstinate bastards who want to defeat the linux xbox hackers at all cost. Both the hackers and Microsoft are motivated by ideology--linux on Xbox is without value to hackers and without cost to Microsoft--hell, Sony even sells linux kits to encourage people to develop ps2 development skills.

    It has NOTHING to do with LINUX. Absolutely NOTHING. Sony charges a few hundred bucks for there linux kit, and i'm sure if Microsoft wanted the xbox to be a pc, then they too would release something or some 3rd party developer would do the deed.

    Yeah, modchips sure ruined the life of PS2 and PS1 ... probably the most successful consoles ever.

    Yeah, successfull doen't mean there the best. Ford Focus's are a top seller, but they still suck ass. Porches and Ferraris are kick ass cars and don't sell very many, but that doesn't make them less valuable then the pintos and station wagons.



    Bottom line, the hardware belongs to however buys it, not whoever sells it. That's what "buying stuff" means.

    Whatever, tell that to sony when you copy their dvd's, tell that to the RIAA when your trading pirated MP3's.. Just because you "CAN" doesn't mean microsoft should let it slide. You can own a gun, but they're not meant to shoot people. Do you think owning a gun means you can do anything you want with it? Does owning your dvd mean you can now sell copies of it because you can? Does owning your dvd player mean you can modify it to play other region dvd's and copied movies? no company is going to admit you have this right and they will do whatever it takes to protect there rights. If its right or wrong in your opinion it doesn't mean you can call me an idiot for having my own.

    Product manufacturers are liable for there product useage to an extent. Microsoft is liable to its share holders, its developers and the consumers of its products. Why would they want to allow you to change the way there product operates when you choose to mod the thing and electricute yourself or break the thing in the process?

    1. Re:This fluff gets a +5? by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      I can load my gun with bullets. That makes it even more likely that I *could* use it to hurt someone. But the loading is not illegal. Even the shooting of targets in certain venues is not illegal. The shooting of people is.

      In this same way, modifying XBox hardware in such a way that it *could* be used to play copied games is not illegal. Doesn't matter what it's going to be used for, it's not illegal to mod it. What is illegal to do is to copy the software, but that is not the same act as modifying the hardware.

      Hell, even shooting someone doesn't make the act of loading the gun beforehand illegal.

      (No, that's not a completely accurate analogy. Just using what's already being waved around)

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    2. Re:This fluff gets a +5? by aminorex · · Score: 2

      This article should get beaten up pretty badly in moderation for being disingenuous and willfully fallacious.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    3. Re:This fluff gets a +5? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Neither company supports mod chipping and for all intents and purposes it always invalidates your warranty and support.

      The company may find it the coolest thing since swiss cheese, and it will still invalidate your warranty. Changing things in your PC invalidates your warranty; what company is going to support a system after you've gone in there with a soldering gun?

    4. Re:This fluff gets a +5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither company supports mod chipping and for all intents and purposes it always invalidates your warranty and support. That my friend, is idiotic.

      Idiotic is believing you will get any realistic warranty support from these companies.

      and i'm sure if Microsoft wanted the xbox to be a pc, then they too would release something or some 3rd party developer would do the deed.

      Microsoft wants to sell these boxes, and the games that go with them. What they want to do with the box once they've sold it to me is completely and totally irrelevant.

      Does owning your dvd player mean you can modify it to play other region dvd's and copied movies? no company is going to admit you have this right

      God, you really are a good little corporate lemming, aren't you? If the companies wont admit you can mod their DVD players to play other regions, WELL, it MUST be illegal! It couldn't POSSIBLY be the case that the region system is illegal.

      Tell me, if I buy a DVD in Japan, and want to watch it when I get home to Australia, exactly WHY shouldn't I take steps to ensure that I can do this?

    5. Re:This fluff gets a +5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this same way, modifying XBox hardware in such a way that it *could* be used to play copied games is not illegal. Doesn't matter what it's going to be used for, it's not illegal to mod it. What is illegal to do is to copy the software, but that is not the same act as modifying the hardware.


      Owning a cable descrambler is not illegal. As long as you tell the cable company and pay for the service it gives you, you're in the clear.

      Do you really believe that people who buy these boxes actually pay for premium cable? Or do they hide behind the "owning one is not illegal" statement and break the law anyways.

      I own a gun. If someone breaks into my house. I will shoot them. Perfectly legal.

      However...If I MODIFY the bullets to explode a 6" hole on impact...

  105. Doesnt M$ know? by funkmastermike · · Score: 1

    There are less xboxes on the prowl than ps2's.... therefore people buy more ps2 modchips. So more people would (presumably) pirate more ps2 games,and Sony loses money, leaving the xbox alone, thus letting microsoft rake in more money..

    ok stupid theory but whatever, its microsoft bashing.

  106. Poke as Many Eyes as Possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Get government arts grant to buy 1000 X Boxes.
    2. Sculpt giant phallus out of X Boxes.
    3. Go on tour across the country displaying giant X-Box Phallus.
    (4. Profit?)

  107. Re:I don't care what you guys say by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

    Why does he have to figure it out? Someone else already did, and then, they did this other thing everyone used to know about - they started a business based on a product which they invented and manufactured, and they sold that product. And perhaps this guy bought that product.

    You're like the tenth person in here to insist that it's A-OK to mod something, but only if you figure it all out yourself. What bullshit! Better get in the car you made yourself in the garage and drive down to your field to harvest the crops you grew so you can eat tonight on the kitchen table you built. What? You mean you BOUGHT ALL THOSE THINGS?! ILLEGAAAAAAAAAALLLLLL!

  108. MS aren't the problem... by fizzychicken · · Score: 1
    As much as I hate to learn that people are using modded consoles to play illegally distributed software, this sort of action makes me shake my head and tut at Microsoft.

    If the lock on the door isn't good enough, you don't make lickpicks illegal, you make a better lock. People selling my software illegally make me mad; governments who allow industry to limit my consumer rights make me livid.

    --
    'Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.' - George Gordon
  109. Cheating them out of profit? by Featureless · · Score: 2

    Who decides what profits they're entitled to and hence what constitutes "cheating"? The console makers came up with a new, arbitrary set of rules: "we know you think you bought this cosole, but you can't do anything with it we don't authorize." But who says they're allowed to make up that rule? The DMCA? Do you believe the DMCA is a good law? Then stop reading. You're beyond help.

    In most informed people's opinion the DMCA is a legislative anathema, to be ignored through civil disobedience and hopefully overturned, either in the courts or the legislature, ASAP. Even with the DMCA, you have to convince a court that the mod chip lacks a significant non-infringing use - far from an open-and-shut case in my book.

    Lik-sang gives you equipment and instructions to modify your console. You can buy it and not use it. You can buy it to install Linux on your XBox (a very cheap linux box with hot graphics and a TV out... interesting!). You can install it and make backups of games you own. No crime has been committed, even under the DMCA, by you, Lik-Sang, or anyone else.

    Use your mod chip to steal a game? Then you've committed a crime. Not the mod chip maker, or reseller, or UPS for bringing it to your door, or a telecom company for carrying the ecommerce transaction... not anyone else. You. No one else.

    That's why the DMCA is bad. It makes a ridiculous bargain with not only our works but our speech, obligating us to guard against possible infringement in advance! Can you imagine how absurd? This is totally incompatible with common sense, let alone with prevailing 1st amendment law. How does anyone know what you'll do with any particular work or speech? The government cannot and should not become the arbiter of speech or acts to insure that it might not "potentially" assist in violating someone's copyright. Not even if IP was our sole industry - and it's not; in fact, it's so tiny in comparison to the size of our economy that this kind of protectionism's negative effects on research, debate and commerce will vastly outweigh any benefit in reduction of piracy.

    The unwritten part of the DMCA is that anything that has the potential to threaten the profits of an IP producer is fair game for prosecution, and whether or not there's a victory prosecution is often a victory in itself. It's called a "chilling effect." Look it up.

    In principle I would love to give Microsoft a way to have a fool-proof business model of allowing consumers to ammortize hardware costs up-front with subsidies through software sales down the line (the console business model in brief), but it is insane to sacrifice our freedoms provide them with guarantees, not to mention unnecessary. The model doesn't have to be fool-proof to work, and every hardware maker knows they are on thinner ice insisting they can dictate what you can and can't do with your property. Is Microsoft guaranteed to have people do what Microsoft wants when they take their xbox home? Absolutely not. Buy it as a cheap jukebox and DVD player, and never touch a game. Run linux on it if you're clever. Microsoft just lost $150 bucks (since the console costs more to make than its retail price)!

    Feel bad for them? They knew the rules of the game, and changing them to make a bad idea work is not how things should go in the world. Mod chips don't cheat them out of any profits - though their users might. And if they can't be bothered to prosecute their users when they do, it is not our problem.

    1. Re:Cheating them out of profit? by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Instead of replying to all of these comments, I'll just reply to this one. I agree with the point you all are making. Perhaps console makers would be smarter to lease the consoles to people much like a cable box instead of selling them. That way they could control what you do with them. Of course, I wonder how many people would pay for to rent a console for some amount of time?

      --
      What?
  110. I know LikSang, Yes, I am from HK by sdugoten2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is some background of Lik Sang. It is a small shop that sell console games and accessories sited inside Golden center in Hong Kong. (In case you don't know, Golden center is a very very very popular computer/games/console/software center for HK ppl and tourist) The shop is no bigger than 200 square feet. There are like a dozen more of those small shops in the Golden center that sell similar stuff. And you know what? Every single shop there sell mod-chips and pre-modded console. Hong Kong ppl already used to buy/play private games, since the era of Nitendo.

    The reason why M$ only go after LikSang is that they are high profile. They sell mod-chips online. There are in fact hundreds of those shop out there in HK sell mod-chip/pre-modded console, they just don't do it online. M$ might be able to stop LikSang sell the chips online, but they can't do shit other than that.

    I am not saying buying/play private games are right, but HK ppl are so used to it that it becomes the norm. One thing is interesting I would like to share with you guys. The way they sell private console games in HK is kind of funny. Console games usually don't sell in Golden center, since this is such a popular tourist spot. Ppl sell consoles games usually in some shop next to Golden center. When you walk in to those shops, you see private games on racks. However, you see no sales or shopkeeper. There is a paper basket next to the door with money and changes inside. All you need to do is to pick your game and put money into the paper baskets before you leave the shop. Usually, "shop keeper" either pretend to be a shopper or watching outside of the shop. Just make sure you did put money into that basket or someone will beat the crap out of you if you don't. So, if police or whoever come, they can't do anything since they can't find the shop keeper.

    Private console CD games are usually around $3 US dollars each and around $8 US dollars for DvD games.

  111. If Sony is just as agressive... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    then why have most of the PS2 mod chip sites not been shut down?

    Perhaps some have been and I've not heard of it, but the last I checked it was pretty easy to get a PS2 modchip.

    Just because they design the system to be difficult for pirates doesn't mean the company will do anything much beyond that.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  112. Let's see... where to begin... by Faust7 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nearly every product on this planet comes with a Terms of Use agreement.
    This specifically states what you can and cannot do with the product. While it may sound like a total invasion of privacy or restriction on freedom, it is something that is required for the better of all of us. For example, the first thing that pops into my head is the Terms of Use statements on pool chemicals. They tell me that I cannot use the product in conflict with its label. Good idea! They are just protecting their buns the best they can.
    One of the chemicals I use in my pool in Chi Town is called "Ultra Shock".
    Hmm... sounds like something you could conceivably convince someone was a drug that randomly sends eletrical impulses to neurons on the brain and causes you to spasm uncontrollably. While you might love this idea, its not practical and definitely not safe and legal. hehe

    So... given that you know products have terms agreements, what makes Xbox any different? I would defend Sony or any other company with the same vigor with which I defend Microsoft. Their product is not to be illegally modified. These mod chips void people's warranties as well as totally fuck with the system. They break more systems than they add capabilities to by far. You should see the soldering diagram that is required on some of these motherfuckers, I have trouble understanding them and I'm an electronics expert!

    They break tons of boxes, cause Microsoft havoc in support, cost the consumer money, cost Microsoft game sales, and overall are a detriment to the industry. It does nobody any good to have these things out there. Even though Microsoft has tons of money, they have a right to make money on their product damnit! Why doesn't anyone seem to understand that? Where the fuck does this attitude come from that just because a company happens to be fiscally healthy it should stop running a for-profit business. Sorry people... you don't just go pro-bono when you feel you've made enough.
    Morons who don't understand business, simple as that.

    People should NOT be allowed to market modifications like this. Microsoft per the terms of use agreement must approve the add-ons that are made for the system. This is a fucking good idea! Its one of the things that Microsoft gets that the Linux morons don't seem to. Standardize and centralize you fuckin' idiots!!! What??? Microsoft actually ***know*** whats going on with their game console??? Imagine that, they can actually determine if someone is about to sell a total piece of shit for the system or not. Good marketing, good low level management.

    Anyway, I could go on forever... you get the point. The course of action they are taking is legal and not only are the mod chips illegal and should be removed from the market, they also totally suck. Read the tech specs on them, seems like a dipshit from high school came up with the ideas for the 'added bugs'. I mean... features.

    1. Re:Let's see... where to begin... by sdugoten2 · · Score: 1

      I think you don't get it. If I install a mod-chip on my console, I KNOW I void my warrenty. But you know what? I LIKE to have my FREEDOM to void my warrenty. That is my choice and I don't think M$ can do anything about it. Just like I buy a Honda civic and mod the crap out of it and turn into a Lotus. The worst is, Honda won't service my car. But they can NOT tell me I can't mod my car. Get it?

      If I void my warrenty and when something goes wrong, I call M$ tech support asking for help, that will be my fault. However, most modder don't give a damn to their tech support.

    2. Re:Let's see... where to begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so you are drawing a comparison between violating the terms of use on a chemical to kill someone and violating the terms of use on an xbox so you can play other videogames?

      wow. and *we're* the "fuckin' idiots!!!"?

      must be lonely at the top.

  113. grrr... by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    I think this is as much a YRO story as a Microsoft one. This ends up applying the Microsoft philosophy in hardware, which I find disturbing -- The idea that they control things you physically own, after you've bought them, paid for them, and brought them home, rings of corporate facism to me.

    I'm not sure about anyone else, but I think I like the idea of corporate facism to be even less appealing than traditional facism. At least there, you can overthrow the government!

    --
    It's been a long time.
  114. never changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not that anyone will read this but

    it's a damn blue shame that m$ shut lik sang. they did have lots of terrific stuff. even if lik sang is in the right legally (and ianal and intellectual property-rah-rah-rah etc) when someone moves in to sue or shut you down with a pack of ravenous lawyers, if you don't have the cash to fight back you lose, period. before all the latent pre-law experts jump up about it just think; you have to have time, the money and the energy to follow the filings, the changes in date and venue, the run-you-ragged stuff that heavy caliber legal counsels (like m$'s) are experts at using. some tiny-arsed video game company in a communist held country doesn't stand a ghost against the most powerful software company in the world

    the entire "you-don't-have-a-right-to-modify-anything-you-wan t-why-where-does-it-end?" argument is way stale. comparing someone modding a toy like the xbox to someone modding a gun or weapon as an example of the "danger" involved in letting some mook make a copy of halo is ridiculous. make the xbox tap dance and shoot sparks, immerse it in water or let it play anything and everything for all i care. you bought it, you can do what you please with it. period. full stop. a videogame never killed anyone.

    xbox piracy might be a serious problem (for a monopolist worth multiple billions, somehow) but it pales to real issues; lousy schools for our kids, medical costs spiralling ever higher, secret government detentions, our ira's draining away because accountants can't seem to tell the truth, a war looming in a global hotspot, and our unwillingness to stand up to idiots who think that freedom and liberty mean nothing more than the freedom to shop and the liberty to choose between two coffee drinks. at the same damn shop.

    bah, i'm moving to a cave. teledisc still going up? er... damn

  115. The DMCA will win by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 1

    Mod chips are, protests to the contrary, legal. The only ground MS might have to contest them on would be through the DMCA, as a chip could be used to run a pirated copy of a game. However, the DMCA also makes allowances for circumvention with "significant non-infringing uses", which a mod chip certainly has (seeing as how many people here want to run Linux on it). Of course, the law only supports consumers as far as they're willing to pay their lawyers.


    Remember DeCCS? That utility that would crack DVDs. Remember how 2600 lost a case because they posted it on their site?

    Well, there was a very legitimate use of DeCSS. That was to play DVD's under Linux. This really should have been allowed under the DMCA but the courts have basically decided that that clause about "significant noninfringing uses" doesn't really mean very much.

    A precedent has been set, so don't be surprised that just like the DeCCS case, mod-chips or even mod-chip instructions are found to be illegal because of the DMCA. And microsoft has the money and lawyers to make this happen.

    1. Re:The DMCA will win by dschuetz · · Score: 2
      Of course, the law only supports consumers as far as they're willing to pay their lawyers.
      Remember DeCCS? That utility that would crack DVDs. Remember how 2600 lost a case because they posted it on their site?

      That's what I meant about the law only being as good as your lawyers -- in the end, it doesn't matter what the law *says*, what matters is what you're able to get away with. And, if someone challenges you on that, it matters that you have better lawyers than they do.

      The MPAA had better lawyers than 2600. That doesn't mean it can't be appealed elsewhere, or on other grounds (as it was a district-level ruling).

  116. Another good reason to use a Dreamcast by 00_NOP · · Score: 2

    Okay, a shameless plug. But one piece of MS sponsored technology - the Dreamcast - has already been "opened" and cannot be shut again.

  117. Re:Microsoft dictates how to hook up your stereo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were stringing you a bad line here.

    Is it within the line-in Phono specs?
    If so, it's fine.
    Putting 15 Ohm loads @ 2.2V P-P, not fine.

    "Casette" is a label, not a specification/requirement.

    Either that or you're a troll... ;-)

    Cheers!

  118. Newer XBox mod chips ship BLANK! by crstophr · · Score: 1

    No pirated code is distributed with the latest XBox chips, as they are typically shipped with NO bios on them. It has been true in the past that some chips did contain copyrighted code and Lik Sang sold them. This is probably why they were able to shut them down. Other ModChip distributors who ship bios replacement chips, without any code on them, haven't broken any law that I'm aware of.

  119. Re:Buisiness model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The console market is running on an outdated buisiness model. I propose that console makers should sell their consoles at a profit. Consumers will obviously choose the best console system blindly and at a price of $450+ dollars.

    Sony and Nintendo are selling their consoles at a profit.
    IIRC, only Nintendo started at a slight loss, quickly going back to profit.

    So now who has the "outdated buisness model"?

  120. THERE IS NO EULA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All right if I read one more EULA joke/complaint post I'm going to explode. There is no EULA on a piece of hardware because you don't license it!! What do you think the L stands for in EULA? Also one more point everyone seems to ignore. Lik sang wasn't just selling them, they were actually manufacturing them. That is a little bit different you know!

  121. There is no EULA! by Almace · · Score: 1

    All right if I read one more EULA joke/complaint post I'm going to explode. There is no EULA on a piece of hardware because you don't license it!! What do you think the L stands for in EULA? Also one more point everyone seems to ignore. Lik sang wasn't just selling them, they were actually manufacturing them. That is a little bit different you know! I hate trolls

    --
    Remember,democracy never lasts long.It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. John Adams (1814)
  122. Bad analogy. by cybrthng · · Score: 2

    It is more like saying.

    "What if i sold you a mod chip for your car that gave your free gas from any gas station using stolen credit card numbers."

    The mod chip for the xbox isn't specifically for running Linux. If it was, what a novel idea that would be. The mod chip is sold as a way to run pirated games, dvd's and whatnot.

    That is all the mod chip does. It doesn't modify your xbox to go faster, perform better or provide an alernative/replacement cpu/bios. It changes the xbox to run illegal software.

    Microsoft isn't after the linux hackers.. no where did they mention anything about linux.

  123. Scissors by MetalHead666 · · Score: 1
    You know what? People can edit their own videotapes with a pair of scissors. They can also be used as a lethal weapon. Better close down all hardware stores immediately!

    If you have a little patience you can modify your SNES to be regionfree and 50/60hz-switchable with cheap electronic parts. Better file a lawsuit against Radio Shack and all other vendors of electrical appliances.

    Paranoia is a beautiful thing...

    --

    "If you go to the next town, going across a desert is a shorter way." - Pu-Li-Ru-La (Taito)
  124. Ooh! WannaBe Censors Afoot! by reallocate · · Score: 2

    Come on! What's off-topic? If you don't like someone challenging the sacred shibboleths of Slashdot, respond to it. Don't try to censor it.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  125. xbox by kpeerless · · Score: 1

    All that's left of the packard bell 486 that I originally bought with windows 3.11 is the floppy. It now runs SuSe 8. and has been rebuilt numerous times. I sure hope that packard bell doesn't sue me for modifying it.

  126. Re: what strategy? by CityZen · · Score: 1

    The current business models for all consoles sold these days is to develop a product which, at the technology available at launch time, will likely sell at a loss, but through cost reductions made possible by advancing technology, will end up being sold at a profit.

    Console makers _must_ push the technology as far as possible when designing a new console, because by the time it is released, it is nearly obsolete (in a sense). But using the latest technology costs a lot of money. Yet as time goes by, that same technology can be cost reduced a lot (thanks to Moore's "Law").

    People often seem to forget the important role of advancing technology when talking about "consoles sold at a loss".

    Nintendo is only different in that Sony and Microsoft have been much more daring than Nintendo in terms of how much initial loss they will bear on the consoles before profitibility comes about.

  127. It looks like a rumor. by LittleStone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guess nobody is questioning this is just a rumor.

    Many things to be questioned:
    1. Hongkong's Custom won't give a damn to Microsoft, unless there's solid evidence they are selling copyright infringed products. If you have taken a look at the product Lik Sang has offered, most of the product could be obtained from other sources, which MS did not shut them down. The only problematic product is the OpenXbox's PC-BioXX.
    2. From cache of Google, Lik Sang's PC-BioXX did not offer a copy of BIOS included. Thus I would say the Lik Sang won't be that stupid to give MS an excuse.
    3. HK is a small place. If Lik Sang is shut down because of that, the news would be on HK's newsgroups very soon, sooner than what you would hear from source outside. There's nothing like that yet.
    4. And how come it is "A representative in Microsoft's Australian subsidiary confirmed that the company has taken legal action against Hong Kong-based Lik Sang."??? Microsoft has operations in Hong Kong. It is extremely stupid to get Australian subsidiary to work a HK problem, when they have all the people they needed in HK.
    5. HK Custom has tradition to announce any raid on companies selling pirated software. Didn't see that in news from HK though.

    It seems to me that some competitors of Lik Sang are spreading rumor during the down time of Lik Sang's server.

    --
    A sig is redundant.
  128. They don't need one. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    Remember, most car manufacturers would probably give cars away for free if they could have total, iron-fisted control of the sale of replacement parts.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  129. Big freakin deal. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    You know and I know that all Lik Sang did was change the name of the company. I'm sure there will be another company very soon selling "OpenX86BoxBios" which is exactly the same thing.

    Ha ha, Microsoft. Even the horse you rode in on is smarter.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  130. typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean "there is no spoon."

    Thanks.

  131. if it makes you feel better, i don't need any mods by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 3, Informative
    I got my dreamcast long before the "Boot Disk" came out, and to play jap games i needed a region selectable mod chip.

    Okay, I stand corrected.

    You can think whatever you want. These companies have vastly less R&D money and legal funding then Microsoft Does. Like i said in my original statements Nintendo chose an uncommon media format, and Sony chose to sell a linux kit. Neither company supports mod chipping and for all intents and purposes it always invalidates your warranty and support. That my friend, is idiotic.

    I didn't say they supported it, I said they didn't bother shutting down Lik-Sang. They did the math, and it wasn't rational to expend an iota of effort to shut them down. I don't know the exact sizes of the companies involved here (I suspect Sony is way larger than you think...) but for Sony or Nintendo crushing Lik-Sang would be absolutely nothing (just as it was to Microsoft).

    Wait, are you now saying companies are idiotic for not extending warranty coverage to modded hardware?

    Yeah, successfull doen't mean there the best. Ford Focus's are a top seller, but they still suck ass. Porches and Ferraris are kick ass cars and don't sell very many, but that doesn't make them less valuable then the pintos and station wagons.

    What, are you a NeoGeo fan, or something? Hey, don't get me wrong, I am not a big playstation fan, but what the fuck does the quality of the console have to do with the impact of modchipping? They sold the most units, they had the most games and the only way modchipping would hurt is if developers refused to write software--instead developer support for sony systems was and is incredible.

    It has NOTHING to do with LINUX. Absolutely NOTHING.

    You offered no reason why it has nothing to do with Linux, and I offered a whole lot why it has nothing to do with stealing games (how many consumers do you think go at their hardware with a soldering iron?) I'm not saying Linux on xbox would REALLY hurt Microsoft, but just listen to Ballmer--those guys REALLY HATE LINUX. I mean, think--we Slashdot people get all upset about it when most of us are browsing here with Explorer. Imagine how much more pissed you'd be if it was your JOB. Imagine if some long-haired hippies called you a thief as they tried to limit your ability to put food on your families table (from their perspective). They can't stand having the enemy's flag on their flagship, ever.

    Whatever, tell that to sony when you copy their dvd's, tell that to the RIAA when your trading pirated MP3's.. Just because you "CAN" doesn't mean microsoft should let it slide. You can own a gun, but they're not meant to shoot people. Do you think owning a gun means you can do anything you want with it? Does owning your dvd mean you can now sell copies of it because you can?

    Obviously, intellectual property and firearms are special cases--there are special LAWS (chosen by the GOVERNMENT, not the manufactuer) restricting my usage of those things.

    Does owning your dvd player mean you can modify it to play other region dvd's and copied movies? Hardware, like a video game console, like a dvd player, is MINE. Only the government restricts my use of it. I apologize for calling you an idiot when I screwed up so badly regarding the Dreamcast, but lets just say greater thought would have saved you from a few mistakes you've posted today.

    Why would they want to allow you to change the way there product operates when you choose to mod the thing and electricute yourself or break the thing in the process?

    Holy disingenuous, Batman! Yeah, THAT's why they shutdown Lik-Sang, to prevent electrocutions they would in no way every be held responsible for. Better make all electrical tools illegal for non-engineers!

  132. Re:Score one for Tha Man (Now 100% off-topic) by robson · · Score: 1

    I also just happened to purchase Ikaruga for my Dreamcast. These are all shooters - and there is no language barrier for pure twitch action like that.

    Totally off-topic, but how do you like Ikaruga? I never got around to modding my Dreamcast, but I might do it just for this game. Is it worth it?

  133. Lik-Sang sellling copied games by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    Th real reason Lik-Sang was shut down, was not necessarily the selling of the modchips themselves. They were also selling Xbox silvers, copied games. http://www.planetgamecube.com/news.cfm?action=item &id=3508

  134. I mostly agree by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    Nintendo is only different in that Sony and Microsoft have been much more daring than Nintendo in terms of how much initial loss they will bear on the consoles before profitibility comes about.


    The difference between Nintendo and Sony on one hand and Microsoft on the other is that Microsoft is willing to take a sizable loss on the cost of goods sold. Nintendo and Sony take only a nominal loss on production costs (assuming each unit manufactured is sold). It is debatable how much (if any) Sony lost per unit on the PS2 if one does not include R&D.
  135. It's not just the chips with a bios they are after by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The odd thing is, I think it is the new Matrix chip they are really worried about, and all the places that I know that are selling it, are selling it without any bios. Any idiot can install it since it is no there is no soldering required. Even the installation manual and video shows off how easy it is to install by showing a woman install it.

    It just came out, and so far a place called Easy Buy has been the exclusive seller for it. Despite this, you know Lik-Sang would eventually be selling tons of them at their premium prices. They could do this because of their popularity and good reliability they were known for. Aside from this recent bust, and a little bit of trouble from customs in the past, they were a very respected site amongst console hobbyists.

    I don't think it's a coincidence that as soon as this miracle mod comes out, they shutdown the #1 place to get mod-chips online. They may be using the chips that come with an illegal bios as an excuse, but I think this chip is the reason they chose to act now.

    I know MS is lame, but this is just ridiculous. I am not a pirate. I ordered a few import games from Lik-Sang for the Gamecube the day before the shutdown. Thanks to MS, I still don't have them. I had to find another site and wait even longer... and the whole reason I'm importing the games is so I can play them before they come out in the states. That small extra time frame I decided to invest in, is now 3 weeks less in total.

    Why the fuck do they have to force the site to shut down, and screw over all the customers who are doing legitimate business with them, buying things other than Xbox mod-chips. I remember when Ebay and Yahoo auctions had to stop selling PSX mod-chips, they didn't shut down all of Ebay and Yahoo.

    I do have an Xbox because it is a fun thing to hack. I was willing to put aside MS's lameness and consider buying games in the future like Doom 3 and certain Sega titles. Now I will definitely not be buying them. Maybe if it had some better games available, a decent controller, and wasn't so lame in general, hardcore gamers would actually be interested in it. The reason so many Xbox owners are using it for everything else but playing legit Xbox games, is because that is all that it is good for.

  136. Re:As a general rule, I want backups by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    Of five Xbox games I've brought home from Blockbuster (they gave me a 30-day rental cuopon when I bought my Xbox from them, I'll NOT pay the Empire for their "software" {no, I _don't_ steal it either, I use Linux and I bought the Xbox for that purpose}), three of them have refused to work. They had barely visible, really minor scratching.

    If the things are so dammed delicate, you _bet_ I'll expect to make backups (assuming I _ever_ buy any). They all co$t $50, and I somehow doubt that they come with a media replacement guarantee! A modchip is required to run these backups. Of course a modchip is also required to run Linux. Fortunately I anticipated that the Empire would fight these tooth and nail, and I bought five China-enigmah chips from Lik-Sang. They made me a deal. I know, I'll be looking around for older Xboxen soon, but these _will_ get onto the used game console market. I've already sold one modcchip to a friend.

    I really like the idea of using backup CDs in the car, though.

    1. I live in Phoenix. Accidentally leaving things in the car during the day exposes them to about 140 F. This is death to VHS & cassette tapes and CDs too, as well as a LOT of other things. Leaving a copy of a CD in the car ruins a 30-cent CD-R, which I won't bother to cry about. I'm pretty sure that falls within the boundries of "fair use".

    2. My ex's kid had his car broken into twice, both times losing hundreds of dollars in CDs and fancy audio gear. I would prefer to supply such _thieves_ with backup CDs. If _I_ make a copy of a CD that I've legitimately _paid_for_ (nevermind that I probably bought it off eBay for a third to half its retail price), lock the original in the gunsafe, and risk baking the copy in my car, that's fair use. If some scumbag (I think we can all agree here that those who break into people's cars and relieve them of their stereo gear are scumbags) breaks into my car and steals that CD, it becomes an illegitimate copy in his possession, and he can't take it to the secondhand record store and sell it. I think that's quite fair.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  137. time for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only hope now apple joins the console market so there is some open standards supporting competition.

    If we had a standard linux platform, development for that platform would be a lot easier as we wouldn't have to support a variety of hardware.

  138. another angle by iucpxleps · · Score: 1

    I cant say much about HK laws and about Lik Sang. I dont know if it's illegal or not for them to operate like that but my knowledge is about affiliate marketing and what can I say is that Lik Sang's affiliate program at commission junction is deactivated as of 10/3/02.

    I was wondering what was the problem is and now I learned why it's gone off. So as they are deactivated I may comment that it could be more serios than just a "site problem"..but than again you cant know what are merchants up to..all that disgusting stuff about morpheus and kazaa etc..

  139. Re:Score one for Tha Man (Now 100% off-topic) by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

    No, don't mod your Dreamcast. However, DO buy Ikaruga, right now. It kicks ass, even if it is so ridiculously hard you will tear your hair out in the frustration of attempting to even come close to mastering it. My performance at this game is pathetic!

    The reason not to mod your DC is that there is a freely available boot disc which will allow you to play Ikaruga and other imports with one swap. It's called the Utopia disk. If you can't find one, I'm sure I can set you up; just follow the link to my site and send me an e-mail.

    You can also buy a product called the Gameshark CD-X or something like that, but it's something like $50; a little spendy I'm thinking...

  140. Um hello... by GoRK · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sorry, but fuck Michrosoft's whiny bitch ass with a big rubber mickey mouse dick. This is just out of line.

    If you read my past comments you'll see I don't usually flame, but this is ridiculous.

    Mod me up, scotty.

    I mean, Jesus...

    1. Re:Um hello... by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Seriously.

      I am replying to myself because I'm so pissed off.

      I can't even post an intelligent argument because I'm so pissed off.

      Lik Sang is a good company and they are always nice to do business with.

      Microshaft is not.

      Fuck those guys. I'm going home.

  141. Microsoft Sucks. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Microsoft SUCKS! BOYCOTT MICROSOFT!

    Oh, wait. We're already doing that.

  142. Mod schmod. by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

    I got my dreamcast long before the "Boot Disk" came out, and to play jap games i needed a region selectable mod chip.

    You do this, and then you have the audacity to complain that you couldn't read the Japanese games? What were you expecting, a babel fish with the box?!

    I think other posters covered your other points far better than I could, so I'll leave it at that.

  143. All right, here it is: by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    It's on the outside of the shipping box:

    "License: Software in and with the Xbox console is licensed to you, not sold. You are licensed to use the software only with your Xbox and you may not reverse engineer it, except as expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation."
    IANAL, so that really tells me very little. I imagine that the interpretation of it is pretty much up to the Empire's legal staff, seeing as how they more or less have their way with the DoJ anymore.
    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  144. Alright, That's it. by jazperbg · · Score: 1

    That's as much crap as I'll take from Microsoft. Since mod-chips were ruled legal by an Australian court, I'm going to start an online distributor of mod-chips and accessories, making sure not to use any mod-chips containing copyrighted code. And if Microsoft wants me shut down, they can go to hell. I'm not doing anything illegal, after all. Anyone with me :P ?

    --
    jasp
  145. Portablemonoply.NET's largest competitor history?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The owners of Portablemonopoly.NET must be very happy since Lik-Sang was the only company online selling the Afterburner GBA for less than they were.

  146. To quote sherlock holmes by Smid · · Score: 1

    "The game is afoot"

    Yep, there's something going on. Might not be just MS too...

    MS puts out a new revision (potentially unmoddable) of Xbox, making all previous modchips invalid.

    But lik-sang buys the open-xbox and puts out the Matrix chip, which has a question mark over whether works with new revisions (not sure if many people have seen the new revisions or the new matrix chip).

    lik-sang's "servers go down" a few weeks ago (track it with deja, we have mid september questions on the fact)

    lan-kwei's web page suddenly removes their mod chips from sale.

    But on a separate note, the gameboy advance flasher manufacturer www.visoly.com drops off the net. With the front page saying one thing:

    "In god we trust, united we stand!"

    Might be nintendo in there too...

    Rumours abound about new Xbox games checking for mods and crashing if found, as well as Xbox live alledgely checking for mods and refusing to work otherwise...

    However, the future of modding the Xbox at the moment? Get your first revision Xbox, and mod if with a switchable mod, such as the Xecuter. Then see what we got in 6 months time...

    But a few companies are flexing their muscles at the moment...

  147. Read It Again, All of IT by reallocate · · Score: 2

    You did see this part, didn't you: "Seen from Microsoft's viewpoint (with which I am not concurring)...

    I neither defended nor agreed with MS. I simply presented one possible explanation of their behavior. Although, perhaps, stating something in clear, direct lanaguage, prefaced by an explicit disclaimer, is a literary construction beyond your range.

    Sure, you own your little box. If you want to build a chip and stick it in there, I doubt MS will come after you. After all, they went after a company, not individual owners.

    Next time, try r-e-a-d-i-n-g a post before you jump to the wrong conclusion.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  148. George Carlin by Quila · · Score: 2

    I think you are using a warped version of a George Carlin bit: "Fuck Mickey Mouse. Fuck him with a big rubber dick!"

  149. Commercial ecology by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 2

    Anti-microsoft sentiments you may find on this board aside, this is exactly the sort of behavior we have seen from the company in the past and exactly the sort of behavior we shouldn't encourage.

    Lik Sang didn't just sell mod chips. You can get those at modchips.com Lik Sang is the only place you can go to find all sorts of mods and tools for your systems. For example, their GBA section contained the Afterburner internal lighting kit, a kit to splice the display to a television, re-writable roms to run homebrew games, and a host of other attachments / gizmos. Lik Sang was an irreplacable tool for the hardcore gamer who loves hardware, or the home coder trying to break into the business. Lik Sang will be sorely missed. And now Lik Sang is gone.

    I had this discussion with a co-worker earlier in the week. He argued that a system should be evaluated on its merits. This is very true, and the XBox is a very powerful system with some fun games. However, one cannot discount the actions of any item's parent company when making a purchasing decision, but especially if said parent company has been bad for the ecology of the business fields it enters. This "crackdown" is a huge one for the hardcore gamer, even if it may seem like nothing to those who buy their supplies at Wallmart.

    Microsoft's business plan so far has been

    1. Buy up big name developers at an unheard of pace (Bungee, Oddworld, Rare...)
    2. Buy exclusives from companies that can't be outright bought (The Matrix...)
    3. Try to shut down anyone doing anything we don't approve of (Chippers, XLinux...)

    All of the above make it clear that Microsoft is trying to limit competition as much as possible, in order to ... what is the word?... Ah yes, monopolize the market. Competition between companies have spawned Sonic the Hedgehog, Tekken, Unreal, and a host of others. The only other monopoly platform in history has been the Game Boy, and we saw how long THAT stagnated until development was spurred on by... competition (WonderSwan and NeoGeoPocket).

    Microsoft enters a new market, spreds it's tendrils killing off all of the diversity, and remains nasty and impossible to get rid of. That's not prejudice, that's history. Please remind your friends and associates that it remains a bad personal and business decision to give money to Microsoft, the RIAA, the MPAA, Scientologists, or any other group trying to limit choice or freedoms.

    -C

    --
    This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
  150. WTF!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah... I think we have to shut Microsoft down too... After all they provide us with software (=Windows) that can be used to hack servers and other computers. I'm sorry microsoft I think we have to shut you down...

  151. Huh. Leasing. by Featureless · · Score: 2

    Actually, I think you've got a really good idea there.

    I wouldn't be surprised if we see that happening in a few years.

  152. keep it up, microsoft. by magister707 · · Score: 0

    keep digging, microsoft, keep digging.

    customer alienation: 78% and rising.

  153. the DMCA by raygundan · · Score: 2

    I'm no lawyer. But it seems that a modchip that allowed you to boot linux, but that didn't break the security on games would still be good even under the DMCA. The purpose does matter to some degree with the DMCA-- I don't believe it applies at all until you start giving yourself access to copyrighted works you're not supposed to.

  154. two words by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Tax Deductable.

    I think it cost the 'US' that much to develop the X-Box

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  155. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    THE LESSER-KNOWN PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES #10: SIMPLE

    SIMPLE is an acronym for Sheer Idiot's Monopurpose Programming Language
    Environment. This language, developed at the Hanover College for
    Technological Misfits, was designed to make it impossible to write code
    with errors in it. The statements are, therefore, confined to BEGIN,
    END and STOP. No matter how you arrange the statements, you can't make
    a syntax error. Programs written in SIMPLE do nothing useful. Thus
    they achieve the results of programs written in other languages without
    the tedious, frustrating process of testing and debugging.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...