Slashdot Mirror


Handshake via the Internet

mattlamb writes "British and American scientists will touch using sensors over the internet. "The implications of the experiment could be vast, said UCL, which describes the event as the world's "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet." " Let the juvenile comedy commence!

411 comments

  1. Oh I can't resist by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 4, Funny

    Porn Stocks Skyrocket!

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    1. Re:Oh I can't resist by jag164 · · Score: 1

      Precious. Oh thank you.

    2. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can just imagine this as some sort of perv Turing Test: "Is it a man, a woman, or a machine operating the hand?"

    3. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just have 2 words... hand job

    4. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there needs to be a (-1 : Predictable) moderation option...

    5. Re:Oh I can't resist by BuffJoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't wait for the research to go commercial? Try the FuckU-FuckMe, the ultimate remote sex solution! :-)

    6. Re:Oh I can't resist by BuffJoe · · Score: 1

      Also see their hilarious FAQ! :-)

    7. Re:Oh I can't resist by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2

      I prefer telegraphed, but what do I know. I am not a cynical anonymous coward. :-)

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    8. Re:Oh I can't resist by yobbo · · Score: 2

      No no, stocks in producers of fufme products skyrocket!

    9. Re:Oh I can't resist by jyang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many posts on slashdot is not predictable, esp those opinionated ones.

      --
      --- You make things foolproof, and they'll find you a damn fool.
    10. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy porn stocks?

    11. Re:Oh I can't resist by wwcsa · · Score: 1

      Now instead of being raped at the car dealership, you can just visit their website.

    12. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do me now

    13. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, just go ahead and mod everything down to -1 why don't you?

  2. You Know Whay This Means! by zulux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Feelie-Pr0n is right around the corner! yea!

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:You Know Whay This Means! by H1r0Pr0tag0n1st · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the words of Dennis Miller:
      "when the day comes that a unmployed steel worker can strap himself into his Barco-Lounger and fuck Claudia Shiffer for 19.95 an hour, it's going to make crack look like sanka"

      --
      Americans could not be more self absorbed if they were made of equal parts water and paper towel. -Dennis Miller
  3. What about the latency? by Tom7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

    1. Re:What about the latency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Heh, maybe 50ms from a t3. Home users will be around 700ms for transatlantic ***.

    2. Re:What about the latency? by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2

      Just think of all the money you could save on creams and salves, not to mention the mental anguish of thinking about baseball or Bea Arthur in a bikini by merely generating your own packet loss.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    3. Re:What about the latency? by Soko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup. My wife demands at least 900s latency from me - sometimes more. 50ms would be ummm.. dissapointing to say the least.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    4. Re:What about the latency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50 ms latency is a hell of a lot better than the average 25 years.

    5. Re:What about the latency? by doug+renfrew · · Score: 1

      50ms is no worse than a condom

    6. Re:What about the latency? by !splut · · Score: 2

      Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

      Neither does the age of the sexually transmitted computer virus...

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    7. Re:What about the latency? by Fembot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget latency.. what about packet loss, DDoS attacks and corrupted data???? That could be very very nasty :-)

    8. Re:What about the latency? by ahaning · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean S&M?

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    9. Re:What about the latency? by HogGeek · · Score: 1
      15 Minutes?

      You've got it easy!

      Mine is very dissapointed with anything less than 3600s of latency!

    10. Re:What about the latency? by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 5, Funny

      lol

      SOunds like you might need to readjust your TCP Receive Window Size Calculation.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    11. Re:What about the latency? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      A real geek would use a Perl script to satisfy his wife:

      for ($i=0;$i<10000;$i++) { &lick(); }

    12. Re:What about the latency? by weave · · Score: 5, Funny

      .. then there is worrying about man-in-the-middle attacks... You begin on one gender and then your partner is moved to someone else of another gender without your knowledge.

    13. Re:What about the latency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, that's groose. but funny.

    14. Re:What about the latency? by x98chn · · Score: 1

      I find the worst is when you don't recieve any sort of an ack...

    15. Re:What about the latency? by radish · · Score: 2

      You say that, but I think a DDOS connect flood from 000's of people at once could be kinda fun ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    16. Re:What about the latency? by unicron · · Score: 2

      I can't even BEGIN to tell you what's wrong with that code. For starters, trying actually writing some code for that subroutine and maybe do something with the $i variable. Just a thought.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    17. Re:What about the latency? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      A real geek would write better looking Perl. :)

      lick() for (0..10000);

      Or use a language with an even more sensible syntax, like Ruby...

      10000.times{lick}

      Hmmmm. No wonder I'm not married.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    18. Re:What about the latency? by echophase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Snippit from the Linux Orgy HOWTO:

      echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

    19. Re:What about the latency? by scott1853 · · Score: 1

      Laziness is a virtue

    20. Re:What about the latency? by helix_r · · Score: 1


      To get around latency, it would be necessary to deliver enough data to cover all possible reactions within some span of time that is greater than the latency period. The problem is that you can do that with something like a handshake. However, it could be done with objects whose movements are bound by deterministic forces + the forces applied by the client.

      A handshake with latency... I can't imagine what that would "feel" like.

    21. Re:What about the latency? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the Receive Window Size is just right. The incoming packets may be a little too small, though.

    22. Re:What about the latency? by scott1853 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. No wonder I'm not married.

      Because you're smart enough to know better? ;)

    23. Re:What about the latency? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

      True, but you can play it back at 10x speed later. "Yeeeeoooooowzeee! Gimme more baby! 20x! No no, not reverse! Owch eek ooch! Buffer overflow, STOP!"

    24. Re:What about the latency? by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

      But aren't DDoS attacks usually based on TOO MUCH data? I'm not sure that would be a problem, other than being very tiring...

    25. Re:What about the latency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hell with that. I can't bloody imagine anyone stupid enough to trust his or her precious little privates to something controlled by Microsoft...

    26. Re:What about the latency? by Dan+D. · · Score: 2
      Oh man that gives me a icky feeling. You know, like that sound you get when you're listening to your smooth classical music and suddenly the net skips out and the music skids CRRRSSHHHHHHH totally jarring your ears.

      So now you've got some soothing touch on your skin and then suddenly the net skips out on you... nasty.

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    27. Re:What about the latency? by buswolley · · Score: 1

      i bet girls would do threesomes this way a lot easier.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    28. Re:What about the latency? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      And a geek who has a girlfriend would know to use:

      while (climaxcount<MAXCLIMAX)
      lick;
      No need to gild the lily, as it were.
  4. not funny by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 3, Funny

    say old chap, that's not my hand...

    and thus teledildonics became a reality.

    1. Re:not funny by blackbeaktux · · Score: 0, Redundant

      it's already here:

      http://www.fu-fme.com/

    2. Re:not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're right on target.
      That's going to join the great words from science:

      "Mr. Watson, come here!"

      "One small step for man....."

      and now,

      "I say old chap, that's not my hand...."

    3. Re:not funny by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      i've seen that...i meant that it's actually happening. scary site though. :)

  5. A Challenge... by phraktyl · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'd like to propose that this be the only post with the word `pr0n', in any way, shape or fashion, in response to this article.

    Yeah, right!

    --
    Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    1. Re:A Challenge... by soapvox · · Score: 1

      I did see the att comment

  6. whew... too early by di0s · · Score: 1

    "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet."
    For a second there, it looked like it said "handjob". That would skyrocket pr0n stocks. I need caffeine...

  7. Lum's Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    To quote Lum The Mad from his current site:

    If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.

    Dear god, NO.

    1. Re:Lum's Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. What if that anonymous b*tch on the other end is your ex. OUCH!!!

  8. Hey! by soapvox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Att can ressurect thier Ad reach out and touch someone

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reach out and Fuck someone, as usual.

  9. Other possibilities? by Hates · · Score: 4, Funny

    "first transatlantic bitch-slap over the Internet."

    1. Re:Other possibilities? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm waiting to read about the first haptic murder. Would a phantom knife cut?

    2. Re:Other possibilities? by jmu1 · · Score: 1

      Depends. According to the GURPS rules(basic book and psyonics), you can cause physical damage with a phantasmic blade. Therefore, I suppose murder by wire would be altogether possible!

    3. Re:Other possibilities? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a new form of vigilante justice against spammers.

    4. Re:Other possibilities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a new form of vigilante justice against spammers.

      ROFL, Mod up!

    5. Re:Other possibilities? by keytoe · · Score: 1


      OK, I just had to drop this in here. I found this quote from an AC here a long time ago and swiped it for my random quote database:

      i'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

      Seems like this guy may finally get his wish! Hope he patented that idea ;)

    6. Re:Other possibilities? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      ...GURPS...

      "NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEER D! "

      "Look marge, there's two kinds of people at college: jocks, and nerds. As a jock, it's my duty to give nerds a hard time."

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  10. Adds a whole new meaning... by myov · · Score: 2

    ...to "Reach out and touch someone"

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  11. interesting by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.

    This story broke on Howard Stern this morning. I will leave 'figuring out what kind of discussion it was' as an exercise to the reader.

    Hint: _orn

    1. Re:interesting by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Corn? That doesn't make much sense, now does it...

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quorn!!!

    3. Re:interesting by Squiffy · · Score: 1
      This story broke on Howard Stern ...


      He must have been hard.

  12. Aww... by eviljolly · · Score: 1

    I was gonna post something sex related too, but damn...everyone already beat me to it...

    What a suprise huh?

    1. Re:Aww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahuh, huh,

      you said beat yeah, beat

      ahuh, huh

  13. How long ... by LordKariya · · Score: 1

    Before the cock-sensors allow over the internet intercourse for only $9.95 ? Oh man, cyber sex at a whole new level. I CAN'T WAIT !!

    Happy TT, everyone.

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
    1. Re:How long ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ffor you? About 4 or 5 inches?

  14. "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet." by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1
    "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet."
    ...followed by the first internet based transatlantic handjob.
  15. Let's hear it for by LumpishGenius · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...hardware handshaking!

  16. The fulfillment of the porn industry by jonerik · · Score: 2

    And million rejoice as the glory hole finally achieves perfection!

  17. Is it just me.. by Laura_007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    wouldn't this be a step backwards? It is ignoring the vast mental conveyance abilities of the internet to revert to the warn physical ideas that most people are so impressionable about. I think that this might reignate the prior discussions that we've had regarding psychological attachment disorders. People should learn to communicate via things like email or ICQ.

    Thanks for reading!!!!

    --
    I am looking to accumulate friends. Please click on the circle and add me as a friend. Thanks!
    1. Re:Is it just me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that actual social behaviour in physical terms is way more important than the internet. You don't want to try to live outside society, it won't work in the long run. It isnt healthy for the human.

    2. Re:Is it just me.. by kevlar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Don't be such a GIRL!!!

    3. Re:Is it just me.. by pkinetics · · Score: 1
      Right now, most people are making fun of the idea.

      How about remote medicine? A doctor in the USA could actually operate on someone in another country, or demonstrate a technique to students across the world.

      All elements of human interaction and comprehension of emotions is lost in a digital medium. So in a sense communications via the Internet are a step backwards. But it sure is cheaper to send an email than to fly half way around the world just to say hi to someone so they can see that you are happy to hear from them.

  18. E-Touch by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    "...will touch using sensors over the internet."

    I know everyone is thinking "Touch this! " So, now I've said it. Let's move on to more clever jokes.

    1. Re:E-Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but we're just not that clever, so TOUCH THIS, Snotboy.

  19. What if it's 2 guys? by infiniti8 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, is it me or does that sound a little...well...you know.. ;)

    1. Re:What if it's 2 guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if it's 2 guys that would be called gay sex - and as long as it's a consensual act - so what?!

    2. Re:What if it's 2 guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is two guys, the site will undergo the heaviest slashdotting in history.

  20. zzzzz! by bartash · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet the UCL side will have a hand buzzer http://www.gagworks.com/gwp_0235.htm

    --
    Read Epic the first RPG novel.
  21. Can't Touch This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headline: "New Internet Touching Technology Announced, Rapper MC Hammer Cries Foul"

  22. Oh boy... by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1

    "The world's first trans-atlantic handshake was immediately follwed by the world's first trans-atlantic handjob."

    I'm guessing the comments on this article are going to get a little... colorful.

    --
    Fooz Meister
  23. touchy touchy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    now all we need is smell-o-vision moniters and the whole experience can be done over the net.

    1. Re:touchy touchy by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Just open a can of tuna and leave it under yourr chair.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  24. oh my! by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. develop internet touch sensors
    2. start porn site
    3. ?XXX?
    4. Profit!!!

    1. Re:oh my! by spasm · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can delete step 3 I think.. : )

    2. Re:oh my! by foxcub · · Score: 1

      I think, step 1 as well. ;-)

    3. Re:oh my! by way2trivial · · Score: 0

      Cyberdildonics.. I can find references from at least 1999 Old for porn... really not that exciting.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  25. Too much.... by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny


    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    One would hope this could be discussed without immediately putting your mind in the gutter, but with quotes like this, it's impossible. It's obvious what these scientists are really trying to develop.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Too much.... by back_pages · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just can't believe they said "wood-like or fleshy." It's thinly veiled one-liner after thinly veiled one-liner.

    2. Re:Too much.... by OhRicky · · Score: 1

      Uh...huh huh...he said "wood"...

      --
      -- Statistics are often used as a drunk uses a light pole: For support rather than illumination. --
  26. I am praying.... by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny

    that one of them is a practical joker.
    American Scientist "And that concludes this historic First Ever Trans-Atlantic Handshake."
    Brit scientist (to his buddies) "He he, he thinks the glove is on my hand!"

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  27. 1000hz != High Frequencies by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Since when did you need "very high frequencies down the Internet using newly developed fiber optic cables and extremely high bandwidths" to transmit up to 1,000 Hertz of information?
    Does anyone here think that 1000 != High frequency and shouldn't require high bandwidth or special fibre optics?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000 Hz is one thousand times a second. So, say, it takes 1 meg to properly convey one "feeling". To then convey a continuous feeling, it would take one gig per second. You can put in your own numbers.

    2. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sampling x number of sensors with y bits of precision 1000 times a second? Um yeah, that's pretty damned high bandwith.

      Figure you need a fairly high value of x to determine things like woody / fleshy material, lets say 100 per square inch. (I have no idea if 100 is really reasonable, it may be more like 1000.)

      Then you also need some decent resolution of those sensors, say 8 bits worth.

      Then we get 100 * 1000 * 8 = 800000 b/s or around 800 kb/s (would that be 781?)

      Now, my hand has more than 1 square inch of surface area, so scale appropriatly.

      Subtract compression, add TCP overhead, and that's still several megabit at a minimum ... for just the sensor info of the handshake. If it is more like 1000 per square inch, then we talking even more.

      And I always thought you only needed 3 TCP packets to make a handshake :)

    3. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      Sampling x number of sensors with y bits of precision 1000 times a second? Um yeah, that's pretty damned high bandwith.
      I agree, but one can expect it to compress well, since the neighboring sensors data is probably highly correlated.
    4. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1
      Figure you need a fairly high value of x to determine things like woody / fleshy material, lets say 100 per square inch. (I have no idea if 100 is really reasonable, it may be more like 1000.)

      Actually, I'd say 100 per square inch is probably a little high, and that you don't need a high level of percision to determine this. Your fingertips have a resolution of about 100 per tip (say 200 per square inch), but the rest of you has a much lower resolution. Your mind will also interpolate expected values, so if you can do 20-50 sensors per inch you could probably fool even fingertips (especially with further computer interpolation). Drop it less yet, and it may not feel quite right, but it would still be recongizable...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    5. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "high bandwidth" necessarily, but
      "low latency" that really matters.
      the articles "newly developed fiber optic cables and extremely high bandwidths" is referring to internet2, but they're using it more for cutting
      down latency than for sending tons of data.

      The relatively small amount of information
      that has to keep coming at 1000hz is effectively
      being used to run a real-time control system over
      a transatlantic link.

    6. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by amthrax · · Score: 1

      This would be true if they were using a more complete haptic interface, but the PHANToM is a "single point" device, so to speak. It is a stylus on the end of an arm, as opposed to a glove which would give tactile feedback over one's entire hand (the sensation from a PHANToM is cool, a full glove would be absolutely astounding). The network-related difficulties that arise in this experiment are due primarily to latency, similar to how many head-tracking devices will nausiate a user after a lot of use, except that, in this case, latency is due to the network and will cause the simulation to feel unnatural (and possibly nausiating, if the simulation is immersive enough, which it probably isn't in this case).

      However, to give a sense of how interesting even a single point device like the PHANToM can be, I have a story. Last time I played with a PHANToM, the demonstrator had loaded a model of a goblet that was capped off on the top. It was incredibly amusing to put the stylus above the virtual goblet and let go of it. It would drop until it got to the cap of the goblet, and then it would stop, and physically dangle there in mid-air. You could then nudge it until it moved off the edge of the virtual goblet, and it would then commence falling until it hit the physical table.

  28. Hard, wood-like or fleshy by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article: "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    There's no way I believe that quote wasn't designed for maximum comedic potential.

    1. Re:Hard, wood-like or fleshy by Pr3d4t0r · · Score: 1

      Oh, the whole article is written that way! The very last sentence is:

      If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.

    2. Re:Hard, wood-like or fleshy by Valiss · · Score: 1

      Holy muther of gawd, that's hilarous. Thank you so much, you made my day! Off to class....

      --

      -Valiss
  29. Handjobs over the internet? by Winterblink · · Score: 2

    I don't think too many people will trust a hydraulic robot hand to their gizmo. :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Handjobs over the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think too many people will trust a hydraulic robot hand to their gizmo. :)
      Remember the new arm Ash got in Army of Darkness? Remember what he did to that cup right after he built the arm? Yeah.

      People are correct not to trust the robot hand, especially with all the jerks on the net.
    2. Re:Handjobs over the internet? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I don't think too many people will trust a hydraulic robot hand to their gizmo. :)

      Yes, but you know that almost every guy is going to try it at least *once*.

      I remember once at night in the pool by myself I started eyeing the vacu.........never mind about that.

  30. Now even more ways to get shot down by dubiousmike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can NOT get any action from women all over the world!

    1. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by El_Smack · · Score: 2

      I have been not getting action from women all over the world for years! Glad to have you aboard, though.

      --


      There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    2. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


      Now I can NOT get any action from women all over the world!

      No, that is the beauty of this: You hack into somebody *else's* action.

    3. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by JimmyBigFish · · Score: 1

      What, like a manage-o-three?

      (bad attempt at South Park joke but very fitting in this situation.)

    4. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      No, that is the beauty of this: You hack into somebody *else's* action.

      I have found the man in the middle....

    5. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What, like a manage-o-three?

      No, you secretly redirect the other guy to the Fat Fetish porno site while you zark his girl.

    6. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by Zemran · · Score: 2

      and giver them a virus :)

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  31. Looks like... by sirius_bbr · · Score: 1

    ...this device can be improved alot now :)

    --
    this sig has intentionally been left blank
  32. choice quote from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    CmdrTaco touched my wee-wee over the Internet.

  33. Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, that'd be every single edition of Mondo2000 having "articles" about virtual cyber sex... I wonder what happened to that awesome, inspired, workable, useful idea. Perhaps it went the same way as Mondo2000? Maybe we`ll never know!

  34. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree. People revert to caveman mentalities whenever they can, and we need to thwart that where possible. If this begins, soon there literally will be defices to allow people to smoke and drive drunk over the internet.

    1. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with that? I'd much rather people drove drunk on the internet than in real cars.

      As for smoking... umm, so what? That's a persons personal business, not yours. It's not like someone else having a cigarette (or 'cigarette', if you prefer) would be able to randomly blow virtual smoke in your face.

    2. Re:Agreed by kevlar · · Score: 2

      Someone smoking a cigarette raises my insurance premiums however...

    3. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blow Me, you Body Nazi Fuck.

  35. Yeah yeah ... pr0n ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    But what about this new technology in conjunction with Real Doll? Now THAT's a money making idea.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Yeah yeah ... pr0n ... by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      i think that's a very interesting idea...i wonder if this could make prostitution legal...at the very least, it would move all the business overseas. what the hell am i saying?

    2. Re:Yeah yeah ... pr0n ... by Tablizer · · Score: 2


      "Damn damn damn! I accidently selected 'Ru Paul' instead of 'Rub'. Fucken menu clutter!"

  36. hehhehheh by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Funny

    tcp wrapper...heh heh heh

    --
    My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
  37. What is the hardware? by HogGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What is providing the "feel" on the remote end?

    Is it a suit? and "hand" like object? a glove?

    The article is very vague! Anyone find other article on this?

    1. Re:What is the hardware? by dscowboy · · Score: 1

      I toured the MIT lab where this was in development. This was about 9 years ago, and at the time what they had was a metal "glove" that did force-feedback, and a screen that displayed a multi-colored cube bouncing around. According to the researcher giving the tour, you could put your hand in the glove and 'play with' the cube on the screen, and the force-feedback would make it feel real. It was behind locked doors though so I couldn't play with it.

      The next month there was a writeup in the PopSci What's New section on it. So the 'single player' version is not exactly new technology... but multiplayer sounds like it would be fun.

      This looks like another one of those things that is a cool idea, but doesn't have a whole lot of practical applicability.

    2. Re:What is the hardware? by SbooX · · Score: 1

      From the article: "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

      Judging from that quote, it must be a researchers penis.

  38. Mod this up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only funny, but doesnt involve prOn.

  39. Better technology already available... by MoThugz · · Score: 2

    For more info, click on this link...

    Will be especially helpful for people whose posts contains the phrase "free pr0n".

  40. first internet fake-out by lamz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Shake, partner!"
    [stretches out hand]
    "Psyche!"
    [deftly runs hand through hair]

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  41. Just imagine during surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when a doctor removes the liver of someone in your family, and they were in for a tonsilectomy, the doctors can just blame the video connection saying that the text on the screen said 'Liver Transplant'. You will have to get satellite surgery insurance to protect yourself.

  42. article says it all. by ChimChim · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet."

  43. Uh...no, not really. by R0SS1 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone remember people using the Nintendo Power Glove to do this several years back?

    --
    _____ There seems no plan because it is all plan. -- C.S. Lewis
    1. Re:Uh...no, not really. by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 0

      Do what? Touch yourself? Doesn't sound like fun to me...

    2. Re:Uh...no, not really. by LordKaT · · Score: 1
      Actually I think thats only half of the story, I belive the biggest part of it is that you can actually get a sensation of feeling (and, accoring to that article, a pretty good one too).

      With the power glove, all you were doing was sending movement information to the NES (or the lil robot dude, whatshisface)

      --LordKaT

  44. ping - poke? by shoptroll · · Score: 5, Funny

    So will 'ping' now be replaced by 'poke'? Gives a new meaning to the term 'finger' on IRC and other communication systems

    --
    Insert Sig Here
    1. Re:ping - poke? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Actually, C64 BASIC may come in handy with PEEK and POKE.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:ping - poke? by ParrotDroppings · · Score: 1

      How about a new meaning of 'touch' ...

      --
      Free ?! Does that mean I can't get a Discount ?!
      This message was /.'ed
    3. Re:ping - poke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget KICK?

  45. Technology Marches Forward by nizcolas · · Score: 0

    From the article

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    Come on people, let's not beat around the bush here. (So to speak)

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
  46. Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait for the followup story: "Script kiddies hack robot hands -- scientists recovering in hospital after repeated punches to the face"

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Hacker fun by jhol · · Score: 1

      Oh the possibilities for extortion:

      "Guy logs into website where you are given a free *job, after a while it says: Pay $100 with your VISA card within 2 minutes, otherwise the hand will squeeze extra tight."

    2. Re:Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 2

      There are just some things hydraulic robot hands should not be used for. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:Hacker fun by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2

      "Script kiddies hack robot hands -- scientists recovering in hospital after repeated punches to the face"

      The story would be..."Hackers hack robot hand...." the followup would be "Talentless script kiddies duplicate ad nauseum"

    4. Re:Hacker fun by Tablizer · · Score: 1


      You will have to sign a disclaimer before watching "The Three Stooges" on this new thing.

    5. Re:Hacker fun by hikeran · · Score: 0

      well it definetly gives new meaning to the Back Orifice software :) .. hrmm so he used a back door to access her back door?? .. bad news for him it was a guy...

      well sure to come (no pun intended) . the new pr0n version of ssl.... SSX .. Secure Suction seX ...

      so .. could someone miss understand a tech and think they are talking about watersports when they ask for their IP ?

      and last but not least.. if people use all sorts of tools to let them play games for them aka diablo and everquest scripts and whatnot.. What about one for those people whom either do not want to engage others in such acts but want to have fun by making others think they are?? hrmm..

      also.. what about waranty ... i mean .. i would take back a bad hard drive.. but not a bad vaginal unit...

      and with the advent of aibo (electronic robot dog) Richard gear wants to know when the gerbils will be released...

    6. Re:Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 2
      Heh:

      ping -t 127.0.0.1

      woohoo! woohoo! woohoo! woohoo! woohoo! woohoo!

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    7. Re:Hacker fun by hikeran · · Score: 1

      ping -t -l 600 127.0.0.1

      W0000 W000 W000!!

      so .. if i got 2 nic cards .. and used load balancing would i get double the pleasure double the fun .. or would that be like having twins?

  47. Oh Jesus God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At last, I can be gay over the Internet.

    Well, I was, but now I can be more gay. A gay enabler, if you will.

    Now I'm the San Francisco treat.

    1. Re:Oh Jesus God by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      'At last, I can be gay over the Internet.'

      Might have more fun that way. I doubt women will flock towards this. Heh.

  48. Can't touch that quote... by iastor · · Score: 1

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    So who gets to work on FeelUFeelMe?

    iastor

  49. and the cheap japes keep on coming! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    If you're shaking your hand at 1000hz, you better be using lotion, or you'll chafe something awful!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:and the cheap japes keep on coming! by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      It is a well known, proven fact that 47% of all hand lotion is used for masturbation.

  50. More info from MIT by burrito37 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a lot more info in this press release from MIT.
    Using this for telemedicine sounds particularly interesting...

    1. Re:More info from MIT by dscowboy · · Score: 1

      What about artists from around the world collaborating on a virtual sculpture?

      Sounds pretty... lame. MIT is stretching pretty far to justify their toy research. As far as 'remote surgery', I don't know anyone crazy enough to allow surgery to be performed on them over the internet. "OK, the bad news is, we had some packet loss. The good news is, our robo-arm is covered with $10M in malpractice insurace, so you could practically buy yourself a new brain!"

    2. Re:More info from MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...ahem. Now, turn you head and cough.

    3. Re:More info from MIT by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      As a user at MIT moves the arm--and therefore the pointer--to touch the box, he can "feel" the box, which has the texture of hard rubber

      I don't remember a 'box' feeling like rubber, it was softer than that... and wetter. i think..

  51. intelligence by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 0
    Oh, I can't wait to see all the intelligent witty remarks that will follow...

    "Huh huh, you could use the internet to touch my nuts...huh huh"

    A troll for 12 year olds...

  52. I didn't want to go there by eclectus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was gonna maintain the moral high ground (HA!) and not go for the obvious pr0n joke, but then, the best thing that could be said was already in the article....

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    --
    This signature is a waste of 42 characters
  53. Forget about latency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about latexy?

  54. Latency? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't the latency levels cause alot of interaction to start looking like a Stooges bit?

  55. Wooooohoooo! Commencing Juvie Humor! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Is that a PDA in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    Reach out and grope someone!

    I touched someone overseas, and got a nasty virus!

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    When will we have bras made out of this?

    I hope we don't /. someone's groin!

    We can make politicians wear this on their head, and punch them when we don't like their votes!

    I've installed this in all my chairs!

    and finally:

    OMG! It feels just like Natalie Portman slathered in hot grits!

    Thanks, I'll be appearing at K5 on Saturday!

    1. Re:Wooooohoooo! Commencing Juvie Humor! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I hope we don't /. someone's groin!

      Most of us wouldn't know the difference.

  56. Re:Mod this up for Troll Tuesday! FPP!!!!!!??!!? by LordKariya · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's good to see that Troll Tuesday still has bangin lyrics associated with it. Hmm, better write something on-topic to trick the moderators...
    a handshake over the internet ?!? What's next, a HANDJOB over the internet ?! LOL ! U r teh WROGN !

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
  57. The internet is going to hell by crow_t_robot · · Score: 0

    Not having to look at, touch or smell other people is why the internet is good. If this goes we have lost everything.

    BTW, happy troll tuesday, faggots.

  58. Give Credit by ksplatter · · Score: 2

    I think everyone out there should take a minute to give these smart people a HAND for the great JOB they have done.

    They Have single HANDedly created many JOBS for alot of Ugly Women!!!

  59. There is no handshake.. it's just hoped... by xintegerx · · Score: 2, Informative

    All they will try do is pick up a cube by working together somehow. A handshake in terms of what we know a handshake to be might not exactly happen.
    Two scientists -- one in London and one in Boston -- will try to pick up a cube between them and move it, each responding to the force the other exerts on it.
    (...)
    The implications of the experiment could be vast, said UCL, which describes the event as the world's "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet."

    1. Re:There is no handshake.. it's just hoped... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      If the cube is supposed to be between them, where will it be, exactly? On an oil platform in the North Atlantic?

    2. Re:There is no handshake.. it's just hoped... by scrod · · Score: 1

      It might just be simulated on the computer.

  60. MODERATE DOWN - SEXIST PIG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be kicked off the net!

    1. Re:MODERATE DOWN - SEXIST PIG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet that was written by a bloke. new man... the toxic waste of feminism

  61. too many pr0n references by digidave · · Score: 2

    Here I am reading the story and thinking "I have a great pr0n joke for this" only to discover that every comment is already a pr0n joke of some kind.

    Can't you people think of something more useful for this technology than that? Like for instance... um... er... do you think they could incorporate this into one of those Real Dolls?

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:too many pr0n references by edmo · · Score: 1

      Can't any of you think of anything other than pr0n?
      It was the first thing that came to my mine to, but this technology has great potential for VR and computer interfaces.

      this could revolutionize the way we use computers & the internet, not just how we view(feel) porn...

      --
      Don't save your orgasms for Heaven; Heaven knows we need them here.
  62. Re:"first transatlantic handshake over the Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet."

    Yeah, as opposed to the first translatic handshake over .. telephone? Telegraph? Snail mail?

    I mean, what does this guy know that we don't?

  63. Spam safety by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spam will not just annoy, but now send you to the doctor.

    "Mom! A pop-up ad poked my eye again. I'm bleeding!"

  64. Speed/frequency confusion? by crush · · Score: 2
    The secret behind the technology is the speed at which the successive impulses are sent -- up to 1,000 Hertz," UCL said in a statement.
    Well, I can see that high speed would be essential to this, but what the hell does that have to do with the frequency? Also, is the uniqueness of this project that it's the longest distance that feedback has been attempted over? Because distance surgery / telemedicine has been happening for a while. Or did those earlier attempts not have feedback? I know I attended a demonstration involving localized feedback from a robot using Fast Ethernet over a couple of hundred meters.
    1. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by akiaki007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've decided not to mod and am going to reply to you. Frequency is very important when sending information. The higher frequencies travel faster and longer distances than those at lower frequencies, and have the ability to penetrate more surfaces. Thus, the higher frequency talked about here means that the information will be able to travel faster and farther than something at a lower frequency. Think prism.

      --
      "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
    2. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The 'higher' frequency that is mentioned in the article is the frequency at which new pressure samples are taken -- in this case, 1000 times per second. It is the approximate equivalent of the sampling rate of a sound file, or the frame rate of a video.

    3. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by ReaperOfSouls · · Score: 1

      I think you are quite confused...Red light and blue light travel at the same speed, but blue light has a higher frequency...Frequency is the mear measurement at a single point of how many pulses you will would pass you in a given time intervul(sp)...In the prism example, angle of refraction is dependant on the frequency...But that is due to wave theory, not an increase in speed...The speed of light in a meduim is a constant.... As for distance, unobstructed, two different frequencies will travel the the same difference...But though higher frequencies do have much more penetrating power, they also have the abilty to be defracted or scattered more easily...The oldest example is "Why is the sky blue and sunsets are red?"...When the sun is over head blue light strikes particles in the air causing blue light to scatter...Since the sky over head is relitivly close the sky looks blue...For a sunset all of the blue light is scattered hundreds of miles away, the only bits left are the red waves when they get scattered near you...This all is do to the shorter wavelenth of higher frequencies....Basically yes higher frequencies do in fact penitrate more, but due to the fact that the wavelenth is shorter they also interact with much more...This is why it is usually easier to get AM stations in remote areas...FM is much more powerful and can send much more data, but it is much easier to obstruct...

      --
      Shameless self promotion : The Misadvetures of the in
    4. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by crush · · Score: 2

      Ah, thank you. Sampling frequency increases the granularity of the feedback then. Makes sense.

    5. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by plastik55 · · Score: 2
      No, you're confused. All light in a vacuum travels
      at the same speed. But in many mediums blue light propagates faster than red. That's WHY colors are refracted differently in a prism; the angle of refraction depends on the ratio
      of the speed of light inside the prism and out (Snell's law).


      And for God's sake stop crapping ellipses everywhere, OK?

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  65. ooooh touch me good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and if it hasnt been patented already, the killer app for this capability could be remotely controlled/directed body-suits for various pr0n apps ? just imagine... a new kind of force feedback _joy_stick with the appropriate silicon/rubber molded 'instrument' and your lover or cyber-anon controlling it in real time.... oh well, this has likely been done already.

  66. Had to be said... by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pull my finger!

    1. Re:Had to be said... by anzha · · Score: 2

      That's covered by the guys doing the I-smell or whatever it was...

      --
      Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
    2. Re:Had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signal faded, connection lost.

  67. Interactive Computing... by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    This story reminds me of a concept a friend shared with me a few years back... he was interested in how much people would pay to shock him remotely over the 'net, and watch the reactions. He had the concept of a web-camera on him constantly, so that you could deliver the shock and watch the results...

    Sample scenarios:
    * eating cereal... ZZZzzzttt... milk everywhere
    * on the bowl... ZZZzzzttt... poo everywhere
    * frosting a cake... ZZZzzzttt... frosting everywhere

    (etc, ad nauseum)

    This is also the guy, however, that said he wanted to be buried with a webcam, so that people could watch him decompose over time, but that's another story altogether...

    1. Re:Interactive Computing... by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      i wonder if i know this guy. i was thinking a similar thing, but place a display on the headstone (and of course the net). kinda performance art of sorts.

    2. Re:Interactive Computing... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'd almost pay for that, if it were something cheap enough to do daily.

      On that note, here is another similar dude proposing to cut his own feet off live on the internet. Yum.

    3. Re:Interactive Computing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On that note, here is another similar dude proposing to cut his own feet off [cutoffmyfeet.com] live on the internet. Yum.

      That alone justifies the new +1 mindfuck moderation. Thanks, I guess.

  68. Just like Demolition Man by AgentTim3 · · Score: 1

    "The exchange of bodily fluids has been outlawed since 2010."

    Be Well!

  69. just wait... by deetintx · · Score: 1

    Any bets on when the first prank groping will occur?

  70. The Matrix anyone... by zvogt · · Score: 1

    Good plan, let's all plug up and eliminate that septic ACTUAL human contact all together. Who's with me?

    1. Re:The Matrix anyone... by TooCynical · · Score: 1

      My fav was the funky sex headgear from Demolition Man.

      But seeing Stallone almost fake an orgasm was a pisser. :o)

      --
      Homer: Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true!
  71. Yes! Soon you will see ads... by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    Yes! Soon you will see ads... for the X10". (inch.)

  72. Just hax0r them for christ's sake by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 2

    Brings a whole new meaning to "man in the middle attack," doesn't it?

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    1. Re:Just hax0r them for christ's sake by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to mention "remote hole."

      Ok, now it's getting yucky. I'll quit.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    2. Re:Just hax0r them for christ's sake by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      Or back orifice for that matter.

      I allways said we were getting butf*cked by M$. :)

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
  73. jag164, a poon who thinks he's witty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yawn

    1. Re:jag164, a poon who thinks he's witty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's right, though. The original post was pretty frickin' obvious.

  74. More information on hardware by Arakonfap · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this link describes the hardware being used - atleast an earlier version of it. Found through google "touch device phantom"

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/1998/phantom.ht ml

  75. Gong have to lower my threshold... by Pr3d4t0r · · Score: 1

    If I want to see any of the discussion about this story it seems.

  76. Wow just thinking about those implications.. by Minter92 · · Score: 1

    "The implications of the experiment could be ".. Yawn...
    Wow does anybody do important or cool science anymore. When I think of the millions of dollars of grant money being wasted on stupid crap like this...
    Trust me I know about the waste I work at a university and you would be amazed at the stuff people are given money to research.

    Is there nothing left cool to discover?

  77. What this means for Politiicans by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blunder of the Ages
    By Reporter AC

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In what amounts to a new twist on an old and venerable tradition, Senator Trent Lott (R) accidentally kissed a hand and shook a baby during a fundraiser in his home state of Mississippi today. The technical glitch was quickly discovered to be caused by an aide plugging the new TouchMeFeelMe internet tactile simulator backwards, but the parent of the jostled child was even less pleased than the baby according to witnesses. More...

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
    1. Re:What this means for Politiicans by BDew · · Score: 1

      "It's much easier to mod me down than to post an intelligent reply. "

      Thanks for the advice!

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    2. Re:What this means for Politiicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an exceptionally moronic sig; moderators cannot post into the discussion they are moderating - but I'd mod you down anyway, due to (-1 idiocy).

  78. The Device They Are Using by istgut · · Score: 5, Informative

    The device they are using seems to be the Phantom by SensAble Tecnologies (product page). I used one of these a few weeks ago at USC's Integrated Media Systems Cetner, they're pretty cool. If you are interested in this kind of thing, the field is called "haptics," from the greek "to touch."

    1. Re:The Device They Are Using by Mordibity · · Score: 1

      > from the greek "to touch."

      Well, of course. As we all know, all words derive from greek. Like "kimono." ;-)

  79. Excellent! by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

    Now we can all choke Saddam while he's reading his email!

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  80. Tele-Dildonics by Phoenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Craig Charles (Dave Lister on Red Dwarf for those not in the know) at a sci-fi convention mentioned this technology or something similar to it. But he had issues with it. His bigest concern with having sex like this over the internet was thus.

    What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

    I know that would concern me

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    1. Re:Tele-Dildonics by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

      What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

      Just to let you reassure you, it would be among the friendliest people in the world! ... if you catch my drift.

      --
      ----- rL
    2. Re:Tele-Dildonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! What WOULD happen?!!? Let's stop all research on this before things get out of hand or before someone things of an even worse possibility!

    3. Re:Tele-Dildonics by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 1
      What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?
      Hey, at least you won't get AIDS! This could be the ultimate in "safe sex".

      Also, if you're ugly, you can make up your own virtual identity. This could be popular on alt.fan.furry.
    4. Re:Tele-Dildonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?



      I know that would concern me


      That it concerns you is bad enough, but I can't stop thinking about the devestated lifes of the Canadians...

  81. You are forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think your overlooking what this will do for games like Q3, EQ, UT, etc.

  82. TCP/IP by Merlin42 · · Score: 2

    So if they use TCP/IP for the transport/network layer do they need to do a 3-way handshake? ...<groan>. Ok, ok, they are probably using UDP/IP in which case there is no actual handshake ... hmmm .. very matrixy ;)

    1. Re:TCP/IP by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > So if they use TCP/IP for the transport/network layer do they need to do a 3-way handshake?

      If they do, sign me up for my first ever 3-way *anything*.

  83. Forget latency! by Gruneun · · Score: 4, Funny

    This makes the threat of a man-in-the-middle attack sound even more dangerous. Ewww.

    1. Re:Forget latency! by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      ahahaha....!!
      yikes!

    2. Re:Forget latency! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      baitbus.com anyone? ewww

  84. Yeeouch! by bahtama · · Score: 1

    Getting fooled into clicking on everyone's favorite goat link could be more than just embarassing now, it could actually cause some physical damage! ;)

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  85. Sounds like something I read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This tech sounds like what they used in "Kilobyte" by Piers Anthony.

  86. At last a safe way to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pull My Finger!

  87. Hmmmmm.... by TooCynical · · Score: 1

    It brings a whole new meaning to CHAP and MS-CHAP. ;o)

    --
    Homer: Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true!
  88. already done by sirius_bbr · · Score: 1

    And there's allready a real application here

    --
    this sig has intentionally been left blank
  89. already been done by fatbitch · · Score: 2, Funny
  90. Unavailable Session by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you can't find someone to ping?

    PING 60.121.1.10 (60.121.1.10) from 102.23.2.12 : 56(84) bytes of data.

    --- 60.121.1.10 ping statistics ---
    84 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

    Gives new meaning to packet loss.

  91. There's a name for it by Dr.+Cam · · Score: 1

    In his book, Virtual Reality, Howard Rheingold talked about this at length (no pun intended), and called it "teledildonics".

  92. Trolls built this city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and we can tear it down anytime we want! congradulations on FP, btw.
    --
    YourMissionForToday

  93. On a more serious note... by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I happened to have worked on a project much like this one over six years ago for a customer of mine.

    The article glosses over the fact that there are very, very few genuinely practical applications for this because of two insurmountable problems.

    For one, our experiments at the time demonstrated that the hand-control idiom suffers from any lag; specifically that delicate manual operations are basically imposible with latency as low as 30ms which rule out things like surgery done this way. Hand dexterity depends on a very large number of relexive immediate movement in response to subtle stimuli like minute vibration of the tool, perceieved resistance, etc.

    The second problem is one that operators of such devices very quickly become disoriented, often nauseated, because of the discordance between years of ingrained knowledge of how the world reacts to touch and the lagged/different input such tools provide.

    People need to learn /new/ idioms for remote manipulation, not attempt to emulate biological systems. That's the same peoblem AI research has suffered from its inception: the day computers will display intelligence is when researchers start working on computer intelligence instead of trying to simulate human intelligence.

    Same goes with tools.

    While this might be a geekly thing to do (handshake over the net) and quite a bit neat, it's neither revolutionnary nor interresting in the long run.

    -- MG

    1. Re:On a more serious note... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 0, Troll

      > [...] subtle stimuli like minute vibration of the tool [...]

      Huh huh huh.

      Um, sorry...carry on.

    2. Re:On a more serious note... by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

      People need to learn /new/ idioms for remote manipulation, not attempt to emulate biological systems
      Hmm, hopefully this doesn't start some kind of troll war, but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this. For now, yes it's easier for us humans to adapt to the technology, but ideally any machine should be intuitive enought that there's no need to learn anything new.
      There's this continued drive to force people to adapt to suit our machines, look at all the confusing devices peopl have to learn to use... they seem simple enough now, but you can't just grab someone who's never seen a computer before, sit them down in front of a computer (regardless of whose GUI you're using) and have them instinctively find there way around. They may learn in a relatively short amount of time, but the interface isn't perfect.
      IMO, The ideal interface for any device would be one that is completely transparent and intuitive, which means it would almost have to "emulate biological systems".
      Anyway, since this appears to be the only thread so far that doesn't refer to pr0n potential, I figured I'd post something here.

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    3. Re:On a more serious note... by freechina · · Score: 1

      Interesting when one considers that all the senses typically work together to provide a sense of reality. Unfortunately, the Internet smell dot.com, DigiScent, folded before this announcement. Perhaps the smell of blood and guts would help the tele-surgeon maintain their orientation. Ah, sweet technolust!

    4. Re:On a more serious note... by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      [...]I'm going to have to disagree with you on this. For now, yes it's easier for us humans to adapt to the technology, but ideally any machine should be intuitive enought that there's no need to learn anything new[...]

      Yes. And no. I think that emulating biological emulation is the absolute best example of counter intuitiveness; unless and until those emulation are perfect (which means at the very least interfacing at a neural level, absolute replication of every aspect, and no added latency) the fact that it is almost, but not quite, like the "real thing" is going to make learning to use it harder than it would be to use an arbitrary system.

      Just look at the problems adolescent humans get trying to use their own limbs because their specs keep changing subtly, making them not-quite what they were when they were kids. The joke about teenagers tripping on their own feet because they forget how to use them isn't much of one.

      Transparent and intuitive are perfect goals, but modeling tools against biological equivalents is the wrong way of acheiving this.

      Look at a very simple interface: a door handle. There are no biological equivalent, but it does its task in a very simple fashion most humans learn without trouble.

      You're working under the presumption that biological systems are inherently easier to comprehend, but look how long it takes humans to master their own body enough to walk, and most will never master it enough to dance ballet.

      -- MG

    5. Re:On a more serious note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't trying to create a biological
      equivalent (like building a computer that
      can think, or a robot that has "muscles").
      It's trying to provide input and output through another biological sense. Imagine your door
      handle but take away the ability to grasp it
      comfortably, and you're suddenly going to have
      a harder time using it to open the door.

      Are you similarly opposed to computers that
      have voice synthesis and voice recognition in
      addition to just printing text? Or that display
      graphics (giving the human eye something to look
      at?)

      I agree that for the purpose of shaking someone's
      hand over the net (er, lifting a virtual cube
      together over the net) it's kind of a silly
      way to "meet" someone and we're doing just fine
      with teleconferencing as is.

  94. Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.

    Hands Across America could be succesful this time - with only two people.
    This could have interesting ramifications (no pun intended ;).

    Seriously, people are already more physically separated than ever; rather than bring people closer, lots of technology has only widened the gulf.

    I don't think I'm breaking any new ground here, many /.ers have been in a place in their lives where they've not had close relationships (platonic or otherwise). Even holding someone's hand has a positive effect on people's mental-well being.

    Could this be more isolating than positive?

    1. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by kenp2002 · · Score: 2

      You Said:
      Even holding someone's hand has a positive effect on people's mental-well being.

      I Say: Your not holding someone's hand with this system. It would be no different than holding a water ballon or any other object/force that has some resistence. There isn't a person there holding your hand. All that your holding is an imitation. I don't see how the two can compare even if there is a "real" person on the other end of the system. I think that as technology continues on, the question isn't that of isolation, but more of a fundamental decline in the Humanity of our lives. The human element is under a seige. This is just another step in the genocide of what it is to be a real living human being. Why leave the house or interact in reality when you have all this technology to do it for you? I see many /. posters that see no difference in meeting someone in a bar in Everquest than in the "REAL" (a term that is becoming more and more subjective) world. I find this pattern of behavior sickening. It makes the human existence trivial and "Obsolete". The terrifying aspect of this, as the value of REAL humanity diminishes so does the value of humans in general. People complain about being a number or a statistic. I find it funny (and sad) that they don't seem to mind being reduced to zeros and ones.

      My 2 cents. No time for spell check, sorry.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    2. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      But what about those that cannot have physical contact?
      Be it for mental reasons (sociophobia, agoraphobia, or many other related diseases), locational reaons (What if you lived in alaska or some deserted country town?), or physical reasons(ugliness, basicly. though really this is more mental if its preventing contact)

      For those aformentioned people, contact is a verry valuable thing, but verry hard to get.
      For them, just knowing that theres someone on the other end possibly enjoying this as much as them could be enough to make them happy.

      Just because you had it easy in life dosnt mean the rest of us did. We can't all live our lifes the way you did.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    3. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by kenp2002 · · Score: 2

      That is the point, IT'S NOT CONTACT. It is SIMULATED contact. I don't dispute there there is SOME value to the interaction. But to equate a simulated handshake to a REAL handshake is disturbing to me (just me, maybe I am overreacting). Concerning all the above people (Especially those who are mental disturbed) is an email or phone call EQUAL to a real visit? If you were in a retirement home is getting an email the same as someone visiting? Of course not. There is a reason family get together when they can, email, video postcards, or simulated meeting online is not the same. To reduce emotion to a bunch of biological functions, ignoring spiritual aspects of the human existence (I can hear the athiests sharpening their swords now) devalues the unique human experience and puts us on the same level as bacteria. I agree with you 100% but you missed the core of the argument I think, I am talking about the trend of equating these simulations with reality.

      I simply ask this, if the trend continues where will the line be drawn between fantasy and reality, human versus machine? Where will the value of an individual originate then? Will going to a virtual funeral be equal to a real one? What becomes of the personal sacrifics we make in order to interact with each other? This is scary shit when you carry out the equation to the end when you dig into the concept of human worth. A good book to read is Lathe of Heaven and Brave New World. Both show the loss of the human value to an extent.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    4. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by bobdotorg · · Score: 2

      Hands Across America could be succesful this time - with only two people.
      This could have interesting ramifications (no pun intended ;).


      No pun achieved.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    5. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by Grax · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying but I would have to say there is a difference between a pure simulation where there is no human on the other end and this which I would call more of a remote control handshake.

      It is absolutely not on the same level with real personal contact but I wouldn't call it worthless either. (Not that you did call it worthless.)

  95. world peace, or world pieces? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm. I wonder if W will use it to give Saddam the finger? Perhaps if leaders can flip each other off, using camel parts even, then it will diminish the desire to nuke each other. Then again it might have the opposite reaction. It would be easier to offend somebody with various body guestures than before.

    I can envision a military guard next to the red button. Suddenly a finger pops out of his/her screen and presses it. "It wasn't me who pressed it, General, I swear to God!"

  96. Limited application? by Helter · · Score: 1

    I can see this doing really great things for video gaming, but beyond that I'm at a loss for where the practical application for this technology is.
    Maybe I'm just behind the times, but is there really that much of a demand to be able to pretend to shake hands with somebody over the internet? Is it really useful?

    I suppose this could be used to some degree in remote robotics, but even there it's a stretch.

    Your thoughts?

  97. Excuse me for a moment by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1

    I have to go file a patent for one-click eGroping...

  98. Next stop, Holodeck by billmaly · · Score: 2

    And then society and science will HALT development. Once we can all climb into the holodeck and roll our own reality.....what's then the point of anything else?

  99. That's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anther condemnation against mankind... next up, bread and circus.

  100. DNS attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the DNS attacks hit us last week, the first thing I thought of was the French doctor who operated a patient in the US via internet. And now this? Please, someone make the internet more reliable, too!

  101. New version of the Turing Test by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    Figure out whether it's a computer giving you a boring handjob, or a genuine boring person.

  102. you do realise that you have an exceptionally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    retarded userid, right?

  103. That's 3 of the 5 senses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three of the five senses (sight, sound, and touch) have now been transferred over the internet.

    I don't think that the remaining two (taste and smell) will ever be.

  104. Avatar Coding by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1

    I see a major market for Avatar coding using this. I think I'm going to specialize in model secondary sexual characteristics of American women. Looking for models now.

    --
    I am not a resource! I am a free man!
  105. Generating your own packet loss by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is that what the kids today are calling it?

  106. Anal exams? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I *still* don't think this is much of an improvement over a regular doctor's visit for a prostate exam. At least you don't have to explain a real doctor's visit to the family, who will of course barge in at an inopportune time.

  107. More info by boatboy · · Score: 1, Informative
  108. Nothing new... by soup · · Score: 1

    Over 25 years ago, in a magazine named "Compute!", there was an article about tactile feedback mechanisms and referred to as "telegrasping".

    --
    -soup (GNUrd, Speaker to Machines) "Laugh at yourself- Why should everyone else have all the fun?" -Romanchek's 6th Ru
  109. Uh, yeah by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it's like a really sophisticated version of a Nintendo Game Glove. Or a MS Sidewinder Controller with Force Feedback.

    Sorry, I don't see whats so awe inspiring about sending data through a network.

    Maybe it's just me.

  110. Sight, sound, and touch. Never smell or taste! by Al_Kane · · Score: 1
    We now can transmit three of the five senses over the internet (sight, sound, and touch).

    But, I don't think that we'll ever be able to transmit smell or taste.

    1. Re:Sight, sound, and touch. Never smell or taste! by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      Considering most of the garbage on the net, I'm not sure I would WANT those two.

      Plus, if it was possible, not only would crappy sights have annoying MIDIs playing the background, but would also have the smell of flowers or something on a loop. :P

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    2. Re:Sight, sound, and touch. Never smell or taste! by alizard · · Score: 2
      Find out who bought the iSmell technology. They had an interesting idea based on microvials on a chip controlled by standard digital inputs, they had in mind smell-enabling Websites. If nobody bought it, you might be able to buy it at fire-sale prices.

      They were hoping that they could get this put onto PC packages as standard equipment.

      Unfortunately, they had the usual kind of VCs... who pulled the plug as soon as the dot.com turned into the dot.bomb .

      I'd already downloaded a development kit. The possibilities for someone with an... unusual sense of humor were compelling. They had a set of instructions... basically Javascript sorts of things, IIRC... as I said, this was supposed to work with code embedded in Web pages.

  111. Re:Rebuttal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen brotha!

  112. MY vote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Stupid scientists.

  113. Dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'll never be able to pass as a 15 year old girl interested in lesbian action again...

  114. Thats Disgusting! by akruppa · · Score: 1

    Man, I hate to think of the spam we are going to get. YUCK!

    Wife (enters room): "Uuargh - What the hell are you doing?"
    Husband: "I got in in the mail, I swear!"

    Alex

    --
    Heisenberg may have been here
  115. Help desk uses, part 2 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Ann: "Hey, this new remote hand technology is great for our tech-support desks."

    Bob: "Do you mean like showing callers how to reboot and find the Esc key?"

    Ann: "No, for slapping sense into clueless idiots."

  116. telephone prOn just as good? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Probably more erotic for two people talking on telephone to tell each where to touch each other and then make appropriate pleasure noises. Letting your imagination fill in the the rest can be very erotic. Ditto for reading pr0n compared to viewing it.

  117. Assault? by 53x19 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where would the trial be for getting assaulted by one of these devices? Source of or at the receiving end of the bitch slap?

  118. Imagine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowulf cluster of these!

  119. There's already an internet vibrator by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    http://www.bluevibrator.com/internet-vibrator.html for those who immediately jumped to the pr0n possibilities...

    I guess that saying about the pr0n industry really pushing the envelope of internet technology as a driving force is true, then...

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  120. Marketing an old idea by awtbfb · · Score: 1

    For example, see: inTouch. It was presented at CHI 97.

  121. Touch and feel internet... by suman28 · · Score: 1

    If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet. Well, now I don't have to deal with 900 numbers anymore. Imagine "feeling" the person on the other end of the live webcams on the p0rn websites.

  122. Porn beat MIT to it :: Cyberdildonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have a read:

    http://onyx.he.net/~hotmoves/LIC/dildonics/

  123. YOU DAMN DIRTY THREE-HOLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey fish-breath, you're dripping. go wipe

  124. A litle risky... by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    This is a little risky, but here's a website with a simlar product, actually for have sexual transmissions over the internet (it's a joke site) http://fu-fme.com based off of the technologies from http://cu-cme.com

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  125. Whole new meaning by conduit4 · · Score: 1

    Gives a whole new meaning to "Reach out and touch someone". More like "Reach out and feel someone up"

  126. First handshake? by Alexis+Morissette · · Score: 1

    So when my modem used to tell me it was "handshaking", it was just lying to me?

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
  127. What next... by natron+2.0 · · Score: 0

    Future Chat Rooms:

    GOOBER475: Hi A/S/L
    HOTTIEGIRL: 18/F/NY
    GOOBER475: Ohhh sounds nice...
    HOTTIEGIRL: Stop touching me...
    GOOBER475: Ohh..
    HOTTIEGIRL: Stop it!
    GOOBER475: Uhh...

  128. I cannot resist... by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    I really try my hardest to refrain from these kinds of posts, but... Can't you just imagine the Pronographic possibilities?

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  129. Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Why is it that "scientists have done x over the Internet" is automatically newsworthy? The same demonstration performed over a cable between two adjacent rooms would not have been significantly easier. Stuffing arbitrary data into TCP packets is just not that hard.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by pitc · · Score: 1

      udp would most likely be called for in this case... I don't think you'd like to have your congestion window size downed to 1 just before _cough_ ... you know... =)

      --
      aoeu
    2. Re:Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      ...Why is it that "scientists have done x over the Internet" is automatically newsworthy?

      Ahh come on, lighten up :) Two people getting direct, intricate touch feedback from each other while on seperate continents is pretty cool, not to mention a first for humanity...

      I know this particular experiment seems trivial, but all first steps are... Give this another 50 years and you will see much cooler applications (including but not limited to all the pr0n ideas made here)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    3. Re:Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      It's not the basic experiment that is trivial. It's the "over the Internet" part. The story would have gotten no coverage had the experimenters been in adjacent rooms.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      It's not the basic experiment that is trivial. It's the "over the Internet" part. The story would have gotten no coverage had the experimenters been in adjacent rooms.

      Probably true, but so what? The ultimate point of the experiment is that they are working on reproducing the sense of touch over a distance X... X might be just into the next room, or it might be across the ocean. The Internet is the means by which the latter is possible, and hence is important to the article - but the focus is on the remote touch aspects of the technology, not the Internet.

      Of course, we all know the real reason why they do this "dramatic" display across the ocean instead of via a wire to the next room is that they are hoping to increase public interest in their studies (i.e. get funds). The fact that it is over the ocean makes it seem a lot more impressive and works much more effectively on the imagination. If this fact bothers you so much that you cant see how cool this experiement is regardless - as I said before, "lighten up" :)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    5. Re:Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by HorrorIsland · · Score: 1
      Why is it that "scientists have done x over the Internet" is automatically newsworthy?

      Because if they did it from adjacent rooms, someone would surely ask why didn't they just walk down the hallway.

      Many people in this world find it vastly harder to generalize an abstract idea than to digest a specific concrete example. That doesn't make them stupid or anything - the world needs all types. I found that the Myers Briggs Type Indicator was very helpful in coming to terms with this.

  130. Re:More info from MIT Porn beat MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone beat MIT to the punch:

    Have a read:

    http://onyx.he.net/~hotmoves/LIC/dildonics/

  131. Online Sexual Haressment by girish · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon this might be a reality! Employee sues her boss across the Atlantic...

    As someone else pointed out, where would you hold the trial for something like this? The place where the person who started the act from? Or where it happened? Hrm...

  132. I think this article is a scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no real technical details in the actual article and there are no useful links to reliable confirming sources of information. I'm pretty sure that either the article is a joke, or its author was scammed.

    You would think if this were real ground breaking technology, it would be picked up by CNN and there would be a link to a site at MIT describing it in the article.

  133. I see evil...drifting through everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are we to blame one group of people for such evil acts? I am not the judge of the Masons, neither are you. My Father, in heaven, is my judge and I carry my heavy heart under his laws. Evil is everywhere. I am a disciple; not yet a zealot. I am in the church of my Father 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and respect the day he rested on the 7th day (his sabath) by not working (being compensated for my time). It is written, 1 John 2:15, and I quote, with emphasis added in bold print, from the blasphemous King James Version:

    Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

    The Bible is a book of love, the holy spirit. 1 John is a verry good book to read and I highly recommend to any aspiring disciple of Jesus (The Father's children).

    Sincerily,
    **************

  134. Sounds like the makings of the first pleasure dome by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Now combine this with some good VR technology and presto, you strap your self in, put on the goggles and insert the credit card...

    Imagine a cybersex cafe instead of an internet cafe... you'd go in, and there'd be a counter, you'd slap down your credit card and the person would say "Room #15"...

    Yup, lots and lots of people are going to get rich and a lot more are going to get some pleasure... Now the next set of moral questions... if you go have sex with a machine, is it cheating??? Technically your just masterbating...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  135. Ooops. Patent problems. by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1


    Someone has already patented sending textures over the net.

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  136. The Teledildonics Bubble of 2010-2016 by jmitchel!jmitchel.co · · Score: 1

    There is a long tradition of boom and bust in the tech sector. There was a mainframe bubble, a minicomputer bubble, the home computer bubble that burst in 1984. This is the technology I've been waiting for to start the next tech bubble.

    Gary Kildall (who wrote and comercialized CP/M, the first personal computer operating system) was a visionary in this regard (From posts to comp.os.cpm circa 1998/08/07. see google groups for the complete thread .

    Previously in this newsgroup, MaoN.Hibitor spake thus:

    : Too bad he's (Gary) not around any more to tell us the story...
    : I met him one night in a restaurant in Austin TX, he was very drunk,
    : said he was someone notable from the early PC days. I just thought
    : he was someone who wandered in from a 6th street bar, he was trying
    : to tell me how he thought the 'next big thing' was going to be
    : teledildonics.. Well, yeah, whatever buddy... gotta go... bye..
    : I did notice a new black Porsche 911 outside, wondered whose it
    : was, but didnt think much of the incident until I read a webpage
    : with Gary's history on it, he had been living in Austin in 92-93.
    : Weirdness...

    On 1998-08-07 Mao N. Hibitor(MaoN.Hibitor) said:

    > INSTIGATOR> "Teledildonics," indeed.
    > INSTIGATOR> Had you, perchance, been ingesting an overabundance of the
    > INSTIGATOR> substance alluded to by your nom de plume on that particular
    > INSTIGATOR> evening?
    >
    >HEH...
    >Nope, but Gary did buy me a beer...
    >I guess he heard about the Robot Group, and came down to
    >one of our meetings, it was about closing time when he wandered
    >in and noticed us sitting in the back of the room with a bunch
    >of electro gadgets on the table. He was quite serious about
    >TD. This was just as the Internet was getting big, but before
    >the WWW and Mosaic wore popular. I agreed that sex would sell,
    >but didnt think mechanical accessories would prove feasable.
    >OTOH, Gary may just have been 10-15 years ahead of the times...
    >Up the net bandwidth a bit, provide the USB interface for your
    >fav toy, and there you are... (or maybe not... but there are
    >an infinite variety of folks on the net these days, and I'd say that
    >about 1/3 of them are looking for digitalized porn... there's a
    >market)

  137. MIRC Dalnet: Welcome to #warzone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *punches Gweedo in the face.
    Like that bitch??
    you think thats funny?
    j00r about to be 0wn3d.
    __________________________________________ _ /me /pencil Slaps baretta with large smelly trout.

  138. OH NO by zentu · · Score: 1

    The once Smell-O-Vison is completed, we will have the first ever Internet Example of Pull My Finger... Just imagine all of the consequences.

  139. That's why we pray... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for Jesus to be with us in the mist. Sin is in the people using such a device in a sinful way. I have a heavy heart for participating in a forum whar the majority of its participants share their ideas of sinful ways to use this technology. May the heavenly Father have mercy on us.

    Sincerily,
    **************

  140. Patent Issues by frenchs · · Score: 2

    When patent time comes, could the fu-fme be considered prior art? :)

    Steve

  141. Murder by gCGBD · · Score: 1

    How long before someone commits murder over
    the internet with this technology?

    I bought it for the pr0n, but now its killing me!

    --

    O=='=++
  142. Re:"first transatlantic handshake over the Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even a NON-Internet based transatlantic handjob would be something of an accomplishment. Talk about long arms!

    AC

  143. Behind the scenes... by Xformer · · Score: 1

    Shake ->
    <- Shake,Ack
    Ack ->

    --
    All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  144. Tech Support could be dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the customers really can strangle me when frustrated.

  145. cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another story I submitted hours or day(s) ago that reaches the front page with a different description and author. May as well just make my own news website. that way my stories would be posted sooner, and with the words I originally used. Wait, I'm already making one. :) Cool.

  146. Frag your friends and show the scars to prove it! by StringBlade · · Score: 1
    This idea would certainly add some depth to the tiring FPS games. Imagine pulling out Castle Wolfenstein (the first one) and feeling the pelting of lead from the Gatling guns...now that could revive some of your old dead games.

    More importantly than getting this to work over the Internet, is getting it to work at home first so you can put on a vest that plugs into the back of your computer and delivers blow-by-blow of arcade action (run MAME and kick some ass with Double Dragon or Virtua Fighter). The bandwidth necessary for a low enough latency to feel real should be more easily accomplished when connected locally.

    Also, perhaps certain actions could be coded into a library of motions so instead of having the transmitter of the action over the Internet send the actual data for each sensor, they only send a command to execute the sense of being hit by a fist in location x,y(,z?). This may help reduce the necessary bandwidth for transmitting an action.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  147. Handshakes? by mbbac · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys, but I've been using the magic of the Internet to finger Stevie Case across state lines for quite a while now.

    --

    mbbac

  148. One word: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
  149. yah, it's you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whoa, and a computer is just a really sophisticated version of a typewriter. who needs that pile of junk, anyway?

    so that makes you just a really sophisticated version of a piece of shit.

    hope that puts it into perspective for you, moron.

    1. Re:yah, it's you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy Ted. Maybe you should take up some craftwork. I hear fashioning little wood boxes can be soothing.

  150. Just Remember... by dos4who · · Score: 1

    "Pat McGroin" is to be used as a UserName... NOT a looping batch file command!!! :) ~m

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  151. erm... by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 2

    this technology will do wonders for www.fufme.com

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  152. Finally, M:TG Online players have an outlet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just added for the next version release: The Strangle feature.

  153. Milkshake by iandunn · · Score: 1

    At first I thought this said "Milkshake via the Internet." That would have been a lot cooler.

  154. 802.11 pR�n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless is the way of the future!

  155. Howard Stern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was on Howard Stern this morning...it was pretty funny. He thinks that in less than 5 years he will be inserting his dick into some computer periferal :P

    NR

  156. Huxley was right... by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 1

    Brave new world here we come.

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  157. Thats Not My Hand Your Shaking ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But thanx anyway !!

  158. Read Lawrence Lessig ASAP by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

    In "Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace," Lessig talks about how the architecture of the 'Net used to enable the blind, deaf, ugly, and quadrapedal*. Everyone had to deal with the same narrow-band stream of text.

    Now we've got things like videoconferencing, voice chat, the ability to swap pictures of--presumably--yourself, and it's making the Internet more like the regular world. Lessig, however, didn't make any strong value judgments about the change, simply using the fact to illustrate that changes in code can alter how the online world is experienced.

    Then again, following the links you provided, you may just be a bit weird in the head. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    * [read: "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.]

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  159. Good touch... by Tattva · · Score: 2
    Or bad touch?

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  160. This is fascinating stuff. by DohDamit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Legal documents can be signed over the Internet. People can put their actual signature down on a piece of paper(provided there's a webcam so they can see what they're signing.)

    2. Provide someone with a transparent mask, and you have talking heads. Beyond the humor factor, you can see all the things they're not saying with their words.

    3. Boxing matches, over the Net. Fight games, oh, and UT5 will be a whole lot more fun.

    4. Back to serious applications, medical procedures could be performed, once this technology was sufficiently advanced. Doctors already wear scopes. Throw on some gloves with this tech and you can hire the best surgeon in the world to perform battlefield surgery(or for those who don't have war on the brain, surgery performed out in the middle of the wilderness.)

    Yeah, I get the porn. Blah blah. So what. This advance is truly amazing, and we'd be fools not to see what we can do with it.

    1. Re:This is fascinating stuff. by kputnam · · Score: 1

      1. How is that any better than signing a tablet input device or another form of input? From the lag you would experience over the internet with this device, it would suck.

      2. This is better than any other video conferencing software because..? In fact, most video conferencing stuff sucks (especially NetMeeting) and email or phone is preferred for most people anyway.

      3. Hmm... knocking someone out over the internet might be worth it, let's hope Steve Case buys one.

      4. Once again, the lag is too important of a factor. If, lets say a dentist, was holding a drill in a patient's mouth and the patient sneezed, it would take too long for him to see/feel the movement and then more lag for him to move his robot hand thingy out of the patients mouth in time to prevent serious damage.

      I agree it's worth playing with to see what new applications can come of it, but it's not as practical as it might seem at first.

    2. Re:This is fascinating stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I get lots of animalism porn. Splooge splooge. So what : I have lots of tissues. This advance is truly amazing, and we'd be fools not to see what we can do with it

      You're already a fool beyotchi. Quit talking about your weird donkey fetish on public places.

    3. Re:This is fascinating stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the signing of the paper is recorded (hmm... or just 2 robotic arms hooked up and only one that you can observe by webcam) by the remote company and all of a sudden you owe them 5000$ and signed a statement that it WAS you who committed three murders... (or something like that)

      i'll stick with the porntential ;)

  161. floor/ceiling threshold suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish there were a way for me to browse at N *or below*. As in, I should be able to set my threshold to a ceiling of 0 so that I only see blatant trolls and stuff about pelvic thrusts in nanotech pants. I can't be the only one who wants this.

  162. telemasonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what will the freemasons do to ensure
    that the secret finger wiggle handshake isn't
    being captured or forged? .. good god, folks ..
    the world will Crumble should a non-mason learn
    the Secrets

  163. Age Old Question Solved!!! by lww · · Score: 1

    "What is the sound of one hand clapping?"

  164. Hardware EOF? by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Extension of Finger.

    So will we have to change the ol' phrase:
    "You can pick your friends,
    and you can pick your nose... ...and with this script you can pick your friend's nose too." :-}

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  165. A History of Telegraph Pornography. by President+A.+Lincoln · · Score: 1



    The ability to transmit tactile data (and pornographic images!) across the Atlantic has existed for nearly 160 years. Patents for fax-by-telegraph devices were filed as early as 1843.

    Check it out:

    Image Transmission By Telegraph: A Brief History Of The Fax Machine

    Cheers,

  166. All three? by docbrown42 · · Score: 2

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    What about all three: Hard, wood-like and fleshy?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  167. Re:Help desk uses, part 2 - Semi-Reality by McFly69 · · Score: 2

    Wow.. now nudie sites will not only be virtual reality but semi-reality. It will allow users to keep both hands on the keyboard and still get the "full" expeirence of "nudie surfin."

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  168. obligatory pillow joke.. by MrPotatoeHead · · Score: 1

    "say where's your hand?"

    "between two pillows"

    "those arent pillows!!"

    kinda gives it a whole new international flavor :)

  169. Aside from Porn... by Eidolon909 · · Score: 1



    This could be very cool for various video games. More than joystick force-feedback you could get whole body shots when playing games like Quake et al.

    Especially cool if I could spawn-kill that punk kid who cheats and every time he dies he gets a thundering pounding in the chest, imitating what I want to do in real-life.

    Sigh.

  170. oh baby by phiz9 · · Score: 1

    Instead of screaming out the other persons name during sex, people will start screaming "Laaaag". "Was it good for you?" "owned."

  171. Can you feel me now? by theBunkinator · · Score: 1

    Good.

    (I'm sorry. I had to. Man I hate that Verizon guy)

  172. Woo! One step closer. . . by mntgomery · · Score: 1
    --

    This comment was generated by a squadron of trained super elite albino ninja chickens for you.
  173. Hand - Shake via internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have in mind many applications for that, and one is too hot.

  174. Re:Oh I can't resist either by circusboy · · Score: 1

    I must say I'm dissappointed to see that there's no pcmcia version for laptops... (or would firewire be more appropriate? iLink?)

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  175. They solved the second step!!! by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Collect underpants
    Step 2: Retrofit new internet connected touch/feel sensors to underpants and sell them as package upgrades for www.hotgnomesex.com
    Step 3: Profit!

  176. Prosthetic applications? by jmcwork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could this technology be used in some way to create 'feeling enabled' prosthetic limbs? I know there would still be issues with impulse delivery to the brain, etc. Just a thought

  177. Blatant attempt at sexist humor by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    Would all the guys be signing up for 'broad'-band connections? (I'm so sorry. I'll just go now)

  178. This is a major advance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to flip someone off with email.

  179. Improved BOFH user education techniques! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fools!

    Do you not realize that this elevates 'user error' handling code to a God like level!

    Yes, I can finally BITCHSLAP my sniveling end luser population in the manner they have long deserved.

    "I need you to try this new biofeedback device."

  180. One day closer to.... by Yunzil · · Score: 2

    the fufme drive becoming a reality.

  181. Fantasy Emma Peel by jlowery · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you guys get this installed to help with my fantasy Emma Peel choice? I'm really having a hard time deciding.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  182. New uses for Palm Computing by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Will the PalmTop now be replaced by the GooseTop? ;-)

  183. Has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now imagine a Beowulf cluster of THOSE!

  184. w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG it staggers the imagination to think of all the scary peripherals this will lead to....

  185. Old News - Pron was there first with by PlausibleDeniability · · Score: 1
  186. Isn't this old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been available since '99 or so! Here

  187. Wow. by Shynedog · · Score: 1

    This really annoying girl gave me her email address on the last day of college before graduation.

    I remember saying to a friend of mine who was with me, "The day I email her is the day they figure out a way for her to give me head over the internet."

    Looks like I might be emailing ol' Sarah sooner than I thought!!

  188. touch you touch me by buttahead · · Score: 1

    c u c me transitions to touch u touch me.

  189. Whats the deal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you use lithium grerase or KY ? :)
    And what about protection... No more STDs... You must worry about electricution after ejac... well you get the jism I mean Jist of it. :)

  190. How about Quake? by Wild+Bill+Hickock · · Score: 1

    Does anyone feel like playing quake anymore?

  191. Upgrade potential by after5 · · Score: 1

    Adding this to a *nix box would bring a whole new meaning to 'finger'.

    --

    --
    J Boylan
  192. Teledildonics via fax by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

    Yeah, it'll arrive on my fax machine...MWA-ha-ha-ha-ha! (I have such fun with these little surprises, don't you know...)

  193. The next tech boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this will help in fueling the next tech industry boom!

  194. Re:The Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, you have a 3rd grade education, and know little if anything about the masons.

  195. and after... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

    The first transatlantic handshake will be shortly followed by the first transatlantic thumb wrestling competition.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  196. if it hasn't already been said by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1


    pull my finger

  197. Before you get excited by Chardish · · Score: 2

    Remember everyone's excitement over "Virtual Reality" technology, circa 1994? What did it get us?

    Clunky helmets, oversized gloves, blurry screens, and generally something very much unlike reality.

    Maybe such technology will have practical applications in 30 some years. Imagine playing a game of tennis using balls equipped with these "phantoms" and an invisible opponent from across the country.

    Be excited for what the future holds, not tomorrow.

    -Evan

  198. Re:There's a name for it- different name- by way2trivial · · Score: 0

    Via google teledildonics 1,930 results
    cyberdildonics 1,080.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  199. Please clean up after you use it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The device is a sticky mess, pervs.

  200. One of my favorite Slashdot comments... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I went to college, there was a girl named Teresa Watt who had an account on the RS/6000. My buddy Rob had tears in his eyes when he showed me that you can actually "finger twatt".

    Thank you AC... where ever you are.

  201. bbc link by loconet · · Score: 2

    Here is another article on this story.

    Sounds interesting

    --
    [alk]
  202. that's not my hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but don't stop shaking

  203. Imagine the Beowolf cluster on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, couldn't resist..

  204. The Joy-Port by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

    We all know and love the JoyStick.

    for your pr0n now available: The interactive Joy-Port

    Think of the possibilities

    How do I itegrate that with AIM-n-Yahoo???
  205. Whee. It's a Phantom Haptic device. by tskirvin · · Score: 1

    This is cooler, and we've been doing it for years.

  206. Handshake my ass... by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 1

    This was invented by some pimple-faced scientists who've got rejected one-to-many times by women.
    When all these tests are done, these guys can get it on with women who doesn't know them. All they
    now have to do is to finish that 3D program featuring a Tom Cruise lookalike person and then it's just
    rock 'n' roll... Yeah Baby Yeah! (of course they have to fix an Austin Powers speech synthesizer.)

  207. How long until the matrix??? by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    So yeah... A little theory I've had recently... If MMORPG's are nothing more than an "Alternate Reality" (with "The Sims Online" being the most blatant example) where people almost "live" (i say this because we all know how obsessive some people are about this stuff), then how much longer until this new technology and said "Alternate Realities" are merged? Throw in some special glasses which display a computer screen (already in development/marketing I think), and voila! semi-immersive world... Thrown in the remaining two senses, an out-of-control AI, solar powered machines that use said AI, mix and stir well... And look what we got... So how long till I'm a D-Cell?

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  208. the end of shit-talk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now when some 12 year old punk on diablo starts talking smack about your weak armor

    instead of leaving the game, you can reach out and strangle his ass !

  209. Blatantly Put by shoptroll · · Score: 1
    As cnn.com puts it:

    "Recreational uses seen

    It would also have recreational uses, allowing people to touch and feel each other over the Internet."

    I don't think /. 'ers are the only ones seeing the practicalities of this... I think someone was a little lonely in the lab late one night...

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  210. Legal ramifications??? by pkinetics · · Score: 1
    Ok... now tht we've gotten down and dirty... but if you did set this up for some perverted / kinky business... would that qualify as prostitution?

    Could this qualify as sex?

    Can you imagine a whole set of laws created making it illegal having simulated sex???

    This brings cheating on your spouse to a whole new level of complexity. Its one thing to send messages back and forth, but then you could actually have a physical relationship, does that constitute cheating?

  211. "frames per second" for touch by CvD · · Score: 2

    I learned the other day that touch, unlike sight, needs a much higher "frames per second" to be realistic. While for sight, 50 times refresh per second is sufficient, for touch this apparently needs to be in the order of 1000 times per second. I'm wondering if this connection is able to deal with this?

    Cheers,

    Costyn.

    1. Re:"frames per second" for touch by CvD · · Score: 2

      Never mind... I should have RTFA first. :-)

    2. Re:"frames per second" for touch by Qender · · Score: 1

      50? All video is about 30 fps, while film is 24. You only get to see 50 fps on a computer or something.

  212. Dial-A-Hand Job by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Think of all those lonely business travelers who need a little relief. This will certainly boost the phone sex industry.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  213. All kidding aside by M00NIE · · Score: 1

    I think this is a pretty excellent idea. Being able to emulate human actions through devices such as this can provide some real human interaction for someone who is for one reason or another home-bound most of the time, such as the elderly. In a UCLA study, it was found that just to maintain emotional and physical health, men and women need 8 to 10 meaningful touches a day (Smalley & Trent, 1986, p. 42). Giving psychiatrists and other health professionals the ability to "reach into" someone's home and touch them is a really good thing.

    --
    "As far as I'm concerned, I prefer silent vice to ostentatious virtue." ~A. Einstein
  214. No it wouldn't. by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

    This isn't about chat, sex (despite the jokes), your social life or mental problems - it's about conveying a certain type of information to the appropriate senses. There is a lot of information which can't easily be conveyed via text or even video but could be very well conveyed using touch.

    This type of technology opens up a lot of possibilities. I'm sure you could also scale up or down the sensations you are feeling. Feeling and picking up that softball sized object may translate over the wires to moving a tiny obstruction in the patients aorta or moving ten-ton boulder in the road. In either case you can *feel* if it slips, if you picked it up off center, or if it is stuck on something.

  215. Too late by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    This is late, its already been done here

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  216. For this, probably a thimble on the end of an arm. by tfofurn · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the fine folks at SensAble are disappointed that the article doesn't mention them or indicate that PHANTOM is an abbreviation (though I can't find the expansion at the moment). I seem to remember it being pHANTOM back in '97.

    Back in my college days, I got to play with a PHANTOM at URCS. It's an arm that can exert translational forces at the tip. They're available with a thimble or a stylus on the end. We had the thimble style, which had a weird harness joint that always kept the finger tip at the "end" of the arm regardless of rotation. You strapped in the tip of your finger in not entirely unlike strapping a foot into a bike pedal.

    From a programming standpoint, you could query it for position and velocity, then send back a force vector. Multiplying the velocity vector by a value between 0 and -1 gave the impression of moving through peanut butter or motor oil or water. I tried using a positive multiplier, but that got dangerous very quickly. You were supposed to be careful about hitting the edges of the range of motion.

    You could simulate surfaces by monitoring the position for crossing the surface and returning a force vector orthogonal to the surface. At the time, really hard surfaces didn't work. You could get many gradations of sponginess, but past a certain point, it wouldn't get any more solid. Surface texture (bumpy vs. smooth) and shape were easy to feel, though.

    One of the really, really slick things my advisor commissioned was to put two PHANTOMS facing each other so you could put your thumb in one and index finger in the other. Then you strapped on a VR headset with a magnetic head tracker. You could see a sphere each for the thumb and finger tips. There were boxes floating around that you could grab, throw, and bounce off of each other and the "walls". Although it was a zero-gravity environment, the "weight" of the blocks between the fingers was very convincing, as were the collisions. You could bounch a block basketball style, and it felt about right. The head tracking contributed greatly to overcoming the proprioception disconnect.

  217. Big deal by kmweber · · Score: 1

    This has already been around for awhile

    http://www.fufme.com

    --
    "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"
  218. Standards Implications !! by serutan · · Score: 2

    It will become increasingly important to use SOAP before SAX, especially over a dirty connection.

  219. It's not you, either, you troll. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    But I'll answer this seriously anyway. We have almost a responsibility to do anything technological thing which we can which does not hurt people. While this technology may one day be used to hurt people (killer robots in your house being run by martial arts pimps ensconced safely elsewhere... it's a bad horror movie already) it will also be used to perform surgery, fix things, and have sex, probably not at all in that order. The latter will open up whole new legal cans of worms; is it legal to pay someone to have sex with you through teleoperation? What if they're in a place where selling fucking is legal? What if YOU are in a place where selling fucking is legal, but they aren't? Et cetera.

    Anyway we the people of the internet have added webcam and voice support to various IM clients, so you can have (low quality) video chat with other people around the world. Eventually you'll be able to interact with them physically, too. Basically it doesn't matter if we cure HIV/AIDS, we'll have a sexual renaissance one way or another. :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:It's not you, either, you troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EAT SHIT AND DIE COCKBITER!

    2. Re:It's not you, either, you troll. by buswolley · · Score: 1

      you wont have to pay.. just map out the patterns of movements created by real humans, and make a bot... a little voice recognition. Se xisn't rocket science, even if there is liftoff.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  220. THE TEST FALIED! by objekt · · Score: 1

    Bwah-ha-ha-ha!

    No handjob for you!

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  221. ACK? by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    ACK.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  222. Practical sexual uses for this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The year is 2058, I'm in Des Moines and my wife is in Lyon. She wants to get pregnant but the distance between us is further than the length of my penis many times over. So using this technology we have intercourse over the internet and my semen is sampled by a device, like a compact flash reader for semen, and the exact DNA values of my semen are sent over to her using a secure protocol and then her device reads those values and secretes some fake semen to impregnate her. It's fuckin' simple.

  223. whole new meaning by squarefish · · Score: 2

    for 'personal computer'

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  224. imagine... by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

    what, you mean an orgy?

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  225. Well now... by Exiler · · Score: 1

    LAN parties should certainly be alot more interesting...

    --
    Banaaaana!
  226. Jay Leno by thepler · · Score: 1

    This story was mentioned on Jay Leno last night. He joked that this type of technology would be used for sexual purposes, or course.

  227. Oh, my folks drove it up here from the Bahamas by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say I like the sig! (proud to be living in the Dead Milkmen's hometown)

    --
    Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
  228. Implications... by tadas · · Score: 1

    Now you *really need to be afraid of hidden goatse.cx links....

    --
    This page accidentally left blank
  229. Let the juvenile comedy commence by wessman · · Score: 1

    "Let the juvenile comedy commence!"

    Okay: Porn sites will make millions off this innovation!

  230. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    A would-be disciple came to Nasrudin's hut on the mountain-side. Knowing
    that every action of such an enlightened one is significant, the seeker
    watched the teacher closely. "Why do you blow on your hands?" "To warm
    myself in the cold." Later, Nasrudin poured bowls of hot soup for himself
    and the newcomer, and blew on his own. "Why are you doing that, Master?"
    "To cool the soup." Unable to trust a man who uses the same process
    to arrive at two different results -- hot and cold -- the disciple departed.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...