Slashdot Mirror


The Ethics of Desktop Chips Stuffed Into Laptop PCs

squareBIT writes "I recently found this article on THG about my SmartStep 250N having a desktop CPU stuffed into it. That's all fine and dandy. but when I paid for this thing, nobody told me it would run at HALF SPEED in battery mode. I don't recall there being any mention of this before I handed them thousands of dollars. Shouldn't there be some sort ethical ramifications put into action here? I feel so dirty ..." The least-satisfactory computer I've ever owned (won't even boot now) is a Toshiba with just such a chip -- wish I'd asked about that in the store.

347 comments

  1. Merchants misleading/lying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am I not surprise?

  2. speedstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    how speedstep works is no secret.. i'd figure you'd do some research before you go and drop that kind of cash...

    1. Re:speedstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      These are desktop CPUs, which don't have speedstep, being used in laptops.

    2. Re:speedstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so dumb I can't believe it. Not only did you not read the article, you didn't even read the post correctly. AND you somehow got modded up for it, meaning the mods didn't either! Congratulations, Slashdot, you have reached a new low. If tripe is "3, Interesting" to you idiots I will go elsewhere.

    3. Re:speedstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and speedstep or not, WinXP cuts the processor speed in half when you are running mobile with the power options set to Max Battery. It sucks I know. But one machine I did try, when I altered any of the options that you can modify, and save as a new power scheme, you lose that 50% throttling of the processor business.

    4. Re:speedstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well dont let the door hit your ass on the way out!

    5. Re:speedstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Last I checked, ALL P4's mobile and desktop support clock throttling, either based on temperature or turned on manually. So you can run the CPU at anywhere between 12.5 to 100% of full clock speed in 12.5% increments.


      While this technically might not be SpeedStep I suspect it is quite effective.

  3. Contrary to this by Overand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Contrary to this was the exciting thing Toshiba did with the Libretto 50CT when they ran out of Pentium 75 chips... they started putting in P120s downclocked to 75. Unfortunately I didn't get one of those, but I *was* able to OC my 75 to 100... too bad someone stepped on my libretto and cracked the screen, eh?

    1. Re:Contrary to this by sacherjj · · Score: 2

      My Libretto has a nice screen, but went from 2 hours of battery life to 0, in a week. Something in the battery is setup wrong, as it couldn't loose that much capacity that quick. Very annoying. I miss the little bugger. It made it 3,200 miles across the country on a bicycle with me, only to fart out sitting on my couch...

  4. Thats Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are you going to do with 2.8ghz on the road? I have a 400mhz laptop and it works just fine. Why dont they start using those lower power Cursoe processors?

    1. Re:Thats Life by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1

      Oh let's see, QII, QIII, UT, UT2K3, SOFII, JKII. Yup, that about covers it. :-)

      Beats hauling a desktop around, and with just as much power for almost all things.

      2.8ghx, 1GB Ram, ATI M9000(64mb)

  5. Check the BIOS settings by jukal · · Score: 0, Informative
    but when I paid for this thing, nobody told me it would run at HALF SPEED in battery mode

    What you are talking about is actually a good feature for many laptops. If you want to maximize your performance while depending on battery, check your BIOS while booting. There probably is some switch for gliding between max. power savings and max. performance.

    1. Re:Check the BIOS settings by MImeKillEr · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is. Its called Battery Optimized Mode .

      Not having a SmartStep 250N in front of me (as I no longer work at Dell) I can't say what the options are to get to this feature.

      Most if not all Dell laptops have this option.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:Check the BIOS settings by Cinnibar+CP · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What you are talking about is actually a good feature for many laptops. If you want to maximize your performance while depending on battery, check your BIOS while booting. There probably is some switch for gliding between max. power savings and max. performance.

      The article mentions in passing that the user has no control over this performance degradation.

      Even if they did, it's hardly convienient have to reboot and enter the BIOS to rev up the processor in the midst of heavy operations.

    3. Re:Check the BIOS settings by jukal · · Score: 2, Informative
      Even if they did, it's hardly convienient have to reboot and enter the BIOS to rev up the processor in the midst of heavy operations.

      I don't think Dell (or any laptop manufacturer) would be that dumb. Atleast in Win you have (based on this: Power Management Dell(TM) SmartStep(TM) 200N and 250N control over your power usage on-the-fly (as usual).

    4. Re:Check the BIOS settings by allism · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the Latitudes we have here at work, it is F2 to get into setup, then go to the 5th page (Alt-P to move through pages), about 2/3 of the way down the page.

    5. Re:Check the BIOS settings by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

      Interesting. The why does my Dell fan only work when its unpluged? Seems like it would need more cooling when plugged in if the power consumption should be higher?

    6. Re:Check the BIOS settings by serbanp · · Score: 2, Informative
      Even if they did, it's hardly convienient have to reboot and enter the BIOS to rev up the processor in the midst of heavy operations.

      Did you ever see a Dell laptop? The whole lot of them have the BIOS settings accessible during normal operation through the right keystroke.

      Yes, you can change the Power Saving parameters to "gimme all the juice, baby" just before starting UT2003...

    7. Re:Check the BIOS settings by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      The BIOS on the Lats and Inspirons are basically the same. The BIOS on the SmartStep 200N/250N systems are completely different. The SmartStep 100N is basically a cheaper version of the Inspiron 2650 minus a floppy drive.

      Just an FYI.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    8. Re:Check the BIOS settings by Random+Data · · Score: 1

      Speedstep uses ACPI modes. In XP (and from memory 2000) you can disable these, and it's easy enough to compile a kernel without ACPI support for /.'s favorite OS. That's if you can't simply disable the setting in BIOS, which is entirely possible - it's in other Dell BIOSes, but I couldn't find details of the SmartStep.

      If you can't disable it in BIOS and it's a system default then you'll need to enable a customised ACPI interface. It's got to be doable - but I'm not a kernel hacker so couldn't tell you how.

    9. Re:Check the BIOS settings by Brainless · · Score: 1

      I have such a Toshiba. I can edit the settings in the BIOS to run full speed on battery, or I can use a Win32 app to adjust the settings on the fly. Can't say if there are *nix ports yet or not, but they are editable.

  6. Return by ProtoStar · · Score: 1

    Can you still return it?

    1. Re:Return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he should be able to, DELL offer the 30 day money back guarantee in the US market.

  7. Caveat Emptor by Inthewire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you bought an old Mustang and found out it was a four cylinder POS and not an eight cylinder monster would you feel cheated? Or would you feel stupid for not having researched a major purchase? Just because you have the cash on hand doesn't mean you have to buy something this second - check it out first. The internet is a fantastic way to learn the true specs of a product, especially computers. Use it.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
    1. Re:Caveat Emptor by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is... On our long road to the perfect society, we are trying to eliminate weasels and frauds. That is why we have consumer protection laws. In your mind, people should not have a legal recourse if they are obviously mislead (either unintentional or intentional). In my mind, if I buy a house, and they build my wall studs out of lego bricks instead of building grade 2x4 and 2x6, that I should have no legal recourse? Come on...

      --
      Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
    2. Re:Caveat Emptor by zaxus · · Score: 1

      Come on, a house built out of Lego Bricks is every Slashdotter's dream. Mmmmmm, customizable....

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    3. Re:Caveat Emptor by Joe5678 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if the Car had a sticker on it that said V8.

      Most end users aren't going to do research on the internet before they purchase a computer, they are going to go into the local computer store and buy one. If that laptop that they buy says it runs at one speed, but then doesn't, they're getting screwed, and it's not their fault because they didn't do research, it's false advertising.

    4. Re:Caveat Emptor by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You must not have read the specs very closely, or compared it with other models, or read many reviews.

      I dunno, it seems that the parent poster didn't read the article. From THG:

      Even more annoying is the fact that Dell documents this energy-saving feature neither on its German- language homepage nor anywhere in the handbook. The English homepage, in the meantime, features a footnote: "Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery." This is pretty well hidden, however.

      So right off the top, if you're German, then Dell isn't even going to tell you that they're selling you a desktop processor that's automatically crippled when running on battery. If you're English-speaking, then you still have to have very good eyes. The "power management features" quote is buried in a fine-print footnote at the bottom of the technical specs page. Further, nowhere on the pages for the Speedstep 250N is the actual slower clock speed noted. At what point is the footnote no longer sufficient? On battery power, the processor drops to 0.7 volts and 300 MHz. Can I complain yet? I'm getting great battery life, after all...

      The parent poster is correct--when making a major purchase, it is a good idea to read product reviews. What we have here, however, is a case of deliberately deceptive (and possibly fraudulent) marketing. It's like advertising an automobile as a V8--but four of the cylinders stop firing whenever you're not in your driveway. If Dell is going to advertise a 2.2 GHz notebook, then it should be able to function as a 2.2 GHz notebook even when it's not on my desk at home. Dell should reasonably be expected to realize that their notebook computers are going to frequently be used on battery power--the clock speeds cited should be 2.4/1.2 GHz at the top of the page, not 2.2 GHz with a tiny footnote. Anything less--even if barely legal--is still slimy.

      As an aside, many Toshiba and Compaq laptops allow you to change a control panel setting to say, "Damn the batteries, full speed ahead!" or words to that effect. Consumers familiar with this friendlier incarnation of SpeedStep may be in for a rude surprise.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Caveat Emptor by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      something along these lines has been going on the car industry for decades, mark car as 'sport' even tho it has (non performance) 1.6 4pot, gti, gts or anything along the lines of dealer sticker tuning.

      this has happened all the time in pc industry too for at least 8 years, oem puters like dell/ibm & likes are often dubbed to be fast and whatnot, while in reality they're not, like ibm aptivas that had l2 cache as option.

      in fact, this kinda marketing seems to be the defacto standard for mass products meant to be sold again to the customer after 3-4 years. 200w 'music power' stereo sets and likes of them are decaying proof of that.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Caveat Emptor by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So by your logic you wouldn't mind if I sold you aa computer that was advertised at 2.2 gHz but that was permanently and unalterably (at least w/o doing warranty-voiding and probably difficult alterations) underclocked to 2 mHz? After all, I didn't lie to you; it has a 2.2 gHz processor in it. I mean, I kind of doubt you ask "yes, it has a 2.2 gHz processor, but does it RUN at 2.2 gHz?" when you're ordering.

    7. Re:Caveat Emptor by ruiner13 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If you bought an old Mustang and found out it was a four cylinder POS and not an eight cylinder monster would you feel cheated? Or would you feel stupid for not having researched a major purchase? Just because you have the cash on hand doesn't mean you have to buy something this second - check it out first. The internet is a fantastic way to learn the true specs of a product, especially computers. Use it.

      Actually, I read a while back that auto manufacturers are developing a "speed-step" like engine management system for cars, if it isn't out already (can't find articles now...). Basically, when you are cruising along at moderate speeds, and don't need all your rated power from your engine, it doesn't send fuel or spark to certain cylinders to save gas. If you step on the throttle, it activates them again. I think it was Mercedes-Benz who was playing with this. I might be wrong, but I think the corvette might have something similar? Anyway, it does exist, at least on paper for now.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    8. Re:Caveat Emptor by karnal · · Score: 1

      Warning, offtopic....

      Just a thought to the "let's kill some cylinders to save gas" idea...

      While to start, that sounds like you'd save gas. BUT - you still have the same amount of rotating mass; the same weight of the car, and you need (shocker!) the SAME AMOUNT of energy to move the engine/drivetrain.

      The only way that I could see an improvement in fuel economy would be to make positively sure that when you're in the "speed-step-optimized" fuel mode, that the valves for intake and exhaust aren't hampering the process. And even then, you would still have to control the cylinder to some extent - you wouldn't want to "draw" exhaust gases back into the chamber..... The next time you'd go to fire it up (hit the gas), it wouldn't exactly give you the performance you expect for the first few revs of engine.

      And the Corvette gets good gas milage... because of a few things. I like to attribute my 30 MPG highway to the 6 speed in my Z28 (1995, which used the LT1 V8 in the early/mid 90's for the vettes...) as well as the ungodly torque from the factory.

      --
      Karnal
    9. Re:Caveat Emptor by ChemGuy · · Score: 1

      Cadillac had this in the late '70s or early '80s. They called it the "V8-6-4" engine. At highway cruising, it would shut down four cylinders to save fuel, then turn them back on again as necessary for more power (at least that was what it was supposed to do). Turned out to be a complete disaster. Maybe it was just an idea ahead of its time - simply beyond the engineering of the day (although GM engineering wasn't a real bright spot for them at the time). I believe you are correct that Mercedes is working on a newer version of this.

    10. Re:Caveat Emptor by Mikeytsi · · Score: 1

      See Cadillac. Also, several GM trucks have a "limp-home" mode that will dump half of the cylinders if there's a coolant failure. However, anyone that buys one of these vehicles is made aware of the feature, as GM sells it as a cost saving measure. On another note, this is kind of apples vs. oranges. You can just step on the gas any time you're driving the car to go back to 8 cylinders immediately. You can't always "just plug in" when you're using a laptop. Not allowing the user to decide what kind of power consumption vs. power they want is simply bad design. Not informing them of it is shady.

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    11. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you learned to spell, your post would have made sense. Instead, you refer to gram-Hertz and milli-Hertz. Is a gHz like a gram per second?

    12. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I told you that your building grade 2x4 was actually 1.5x3.5? And what if I told you that your wood 2x4 was actually metal. As long as you don't try punching a hole in the wall to check, or do something like remodel you shouldn't have to worry about these things. Same goes with processor speed. Unless your running Doom 3, Speedstep is not a life changing event.

    13. Re:Caveat Emptor by dildatron · · Score: 2

      Just to add a little detail, it was in 1981. And yes, it was an ill-fated disaster.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    14. Re:Caveat Emptor by EvanED · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I'm sure you can figure it out. (And I'm surpried you didn't comment on the "aa" typo...) But in case you can, here, I'll go over it again in language you may be able to understand:

      "So would not care if I sold you a computer that I said came with a 2.2 GHz chip but that was set to run at only 2 MHz? You also cannot change that setting to make it run faster. After all, I didn't lie to you; it has a 2.2 GHz processor in it. I mean, I kind of doubt you ask "yes, it has a 2.2 GHz processor, but does it RUN at 2.2 GHz?" when you're buying a computer."

      There. I removed most of the big words for you. You may want to look up "probably" though.

    15. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can hook an oscilliscope up to the crystal generator or whatever they use nowadays, and count the cycles. "

      Yeah, it'll read a 14.31818 MHz sine wave. There's a clock chip that takes that reference frequency and generates the bus frequencies the motherboard uses. The ~33MHz PCI bus, the 24/48MHz USB clock, the 133MHz SDRAM/CPU clocks, etc. The 2.2GHz is internal to the CPU, and you could probably use a spectrum analyzer to check for the spike at 2.2GHz, with an antenna.

      14.31818MHz is 4 times the NTSC color frequency, and is probably the most built, most sold and cheapest crystal ever made. It's used in everything from the original PC to the Commodore 64.

    16. Re:Caveat Emptor by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>Second, this *isn't* "unalterably" modified. Not by any means. All you have to do is plug it into a wall outlet and its how it was advertised.

      OK, I'll buy it. Oh wait, planes don't have outlets...

      I don't know about you, but if I buy a laptop it's so I can use it places where you can't have a desktop. In a car, in a plane, out on the campus quad, constantly walking around, etc. So let me admend my statement: It will run at full speed, but only when connected to an uninterruptable power supply that is the computer's sole source of power. That is roughly analogous to my use of a plugged-in laptop.

      I'd also like to say that your HDD manufacturer analogy is false. There is a well-known and accepted standard for what kilo-, mega-, giga-, etc. means. Only in computers will you find that kilo- isn't 1000 and giga- isn't 1 billion. Here, in my mind, it's the places where kilo- is used as 1024 that's wrong (in a factual, not a moral, sense).

      On the other hand, if I say "here's a computer with a 2.2 GHz processor", there should be no reason to believe it runs otherwise unless it is *explicitly* stated. Dell's site does have the info, but it's not even on the main ordering page; you have to click "Learn more", then on the "Details" tab, then read a footnote before there's any mention that it runs slower. That doesn't classify as reasonable notice in my book. There's no mention on the main page that the chip will act any differently than normal.

      It's as if you're buying a car that will only exceed 25 mph every other day (so you're less likely to be hurt in a crash), but this information isn't even hinted at unless you explicitly request detailed information on the engine. Now, there are some people who would request specific information on the engine, and if this was my first car buy, I would too. But let's say you've bought very similar cars from the same company (or even similar cars from different companies, but those cars are made form the same parts) on multiple occasions. Eventually you stop looking at the detailed specs, especially because they are not much more informative than what you can get from the main page. (The detailed view regularily only provides three useful pieces of information no present on the main page: the BUS speed, the L2 cache, and if it has SIMD extensions.) Your prior experience is that the detailed specs are almost worthless. I would argue that the dealer was negligant in informing you of an aspect of the car that would otherwise be completely unexpected.

    17. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your point? The more expensive an object is, the more burden should be placed on the purchaser to discover problems or misleading advertising statements, and the less the seller should have to be up front and honest about the product?

    18. Re:Caveat Emptor by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Informative

      " Just to add a little detail, it was in 1981. And yes, it was an ill-fated disaster."

      To add a bit more detail

      The V-8-6-4 was not the disaster many think it was. The dropable cylinder trick was a bandaid to boost fuel economy until they could release the notorious HT4100 aluminum V8 in 1982. They never *expected* to use it for long.

      They only made the V-8-6-4 for one year and never really refined the controller for it. People disliked them because of the way they acted, not because they were problematic. You could unplug a few wires and it would run just like the normal V8. It was a 6.0 liter, and it was the last of the great line of Cadillac's iron V8's.

    19. Re:Caveat Emptor by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Hmm. LEGO bricks cost MUCH more than 2x4s. I want this company! (Lego goes for $10 a pound used, $25 a pound or more new: $7.99 for a quarter pound at LEGOLAND.)

      www.LUGNet.com

    20. Re:Caveat Emptor by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Cadillac actually came out with something like this in the 80's - seriously - I had a friend who had one that did this at highway speeds.

    21. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, let's not forget, everyone could just stop being stupid and go over to Apple, where these sort of things DO NOT EVER happen.

    22. Re:Caveat Emptor by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      underclocked to 2 mHz

      I'm sure if you sold somebody a computer underclocked to 2 milliHertz they would just assume it was defective and return it. I mean, let's be real, it would take four days to get through the POST, so everybody would assume it was just defective.

    23. Re:Caveat Emptor by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      "Damn the batteries, full speed ahead!"

      I remember once that a medical device I was designing used a voice-coil buzzer for it's audio annunciator. It drew considerable current. Marketing wanted me to put in code to sound the beeper when low battery was detected.

      I discovered it could make one small peep before the 'low battery alarm' completely killed off all remaining power.

    24. Re:Caveat Emptor by maxume · · Score: 2

      Yeah, gm is getting into this. They are even close to solving the problems that occurred when they tried it earlier(it wasn't real smooth), as another poster pointed out. I think that MB is also in on it, but I am not sure.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    25. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be "But in case you can't"?

      EvanED needs more Special ED

    26. Re:Caveat Emptor by lingqi · · Score: 1

      Yeah MB had this in one of their newer sedans.

      FYI, though - the cylinder is still used every once in a while (once per 60 revs or some such) even in "gas save mode" to make sure the cylinder keeps warm. Pretty important.

      Car and Driver had an article about this within the last year. I am sure you can find it online somewhere.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    27. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, I'll buy it. Oh wait, planes don't have outlets...

      Oh wait, you haven't flown business class in a while...

    28. Re:Caveat Emptor by Grab · · Score: 2

      Are you seriously saying that most people don't look into the details of what they're spending $1000 on? (or more - the guy says "thousands") If you've got enough money that you don't have to think, get any info or shop around for better deals before you buy something that expensive, then frankly you've got enough money that you can stop complaining. If you've not got that much money but you've gone out and bought the first thing you see anyway, that's hardly the store's problem.

      A more accurate comparison. You buy a car which says "diesel 2.5-litre" clearly on the badge and. You then complain about the performance not being the same as a 2.5-litre gasoline car. As ever, analogies suck. But if you've gone into a shop and said "I want that one", it's your problem. It's not the shop assistant's job to say "Are you sure?"

      Of course, if you've asked the shop assistant for details and advice about that laptop, and he/she hasn't mentioned how SpeedStep works, then you have a case for taking it back because of mis-selling. You can only do this though if you've bought the PC based on the assistant's advice on what would suit you best. If you've just gone in, picked a box off the shelf and taken it to the checkout, the assistant really isn't in a position to question your choice.

      Grab.

    29. Re:Caveat Emptor by blawson · · Score: 1

      What you folks are describing sounds a lot like Honda's VTEC variable valve-timing engines - its in 4 or 5 different "sportsy" cars ranging from Civic Si's to the S2000. It uses camshafts with two different cam profiles, one that opens the valves more and for longer, and one cam profile that is more fuel conservative. The performance cams kick in at about 3500 rpm and the fun starts.

      it's a performance compromise with fuel efficiency in mind that also delivers good performance. isn't that what your speedstep is?

      blawson

    30. Re:Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey all new Mercedes Benz car's do this. You run it below 60kmph (~40mph) and it runs on 4 cylinders

    31. Re:Caveat Emptor by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      actually, the performance valves don't open until about 6000 RPM. I have many friends with VTECs, I know.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    32. Re:Caveat Emptor by dafozzee · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was Cadillac back in the 80s...
      Click HERE (Page 7) for a complete history of Cadillac's Northstar engines.

    33. Re:Caveat Emptor by yngv · · Score: 1

      You may be modded as 'troll', but I believe your point is good. At first I found myself saying "hey, they should have said something..." but as I read your comments on being an aggressive/smart capitalist, I realized you are correct, and I was guilty of becoming what I dislike in our society -- the lazy consumer who demands protection instead of a wily hunter who takes responsibility for his/her actions. We do have a responsibility to be smart consumers, understand the product you intend to purchase, ask questions, haggle (if possible), and make informed decisions. We are not children.

      Television and other media have bred us to be the 'buy NOW' consumer, hooked on the quick fix of an impulse purchase. It's tough to stand back and recognize that and change your ways. But we all must if we intend to NOT be screwed by hungrier and hungrier companies.

  8. Cyrix by Natchswing · · Score: 3, Funny

    A CPU that only runs half as fast as you expect. Wouldn't that be a Cyrix or an AMD k5?

    1. Re:Cyrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange... my k5-166 used to be equal ("feel" wise) with my p200mmx...

    2. Re:Cyrix by DragonWyatt · · Score: 2

      A CPU that only runs half as fast as you expect. Wouldn't that be a Cyrix or an AMD k5?

      Or a Pentium4?

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    3. Re:Cyrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a VIA - C3 has a half speed FPU.

  9. Remedying the situation by Kargan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the manufacturer and/or retailer is not going to take the responsibility and state things like this up front, then it's up to the consumers (us) to spread the word to each other in whatever way we can. Forums like Slashdot should go a long way towards educating the general public, and enlightening potential buyers. If "they're" not going to do it, we will...

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  10. Caveat Emptor by glrotate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I spend $50 on something I want to know exactly what I'm getting. If you spend $2000, and are this unimformed than you deserve what you get. You must not have read the specs very closely, or compared it with other models, or read many reviews. I guess you won't make the same mistake twice.

  11. They DID mention it to you! by Metalhead01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you pull out all the papers they gave you, and look at the REALLY REALLY REALLY fine print, it's there. Right next to the spot where you agree to give them your soul upon purchasing it.

    --
    The only reason I keep my Windows partition is so I can mount it like the bitch that it is.
  12. Caveat Emptor! by mekkab · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did you bother to figure out what SmartStep/SpeedStep means?

    If you did a modicum of research you would know that you run at a far slower speed in battery mode.

    Now Toshiba DOES allow you to fix this setting (in the control panels) but this should not come as a surprise to any educated consumer.

    When I was shopping around for a laptop for my wife we came across a darling little Toshiba Portege- and one of the first things mentioned in the CNET review even mentioned "Mobile Pentium III with Intel SpeedStep technology" and went on to explain what SpeedStep meant.

    So when my wife types away in class if she can't find an outlet she can expect it to be slow. Easy Solution.

    O.T. P.S.: is it my connect, or is slashdot slow today?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Caveat Emptor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      O.T.A.R (Anonymous Reply, naturally)

      Slashdot has been painfully slow for me as well today. (Located in West Michigan, FWIW.)

    2. Re:Caveat Emptor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      O.T. P.S.: is it my connect, or is slashdot slow today?

      I'll assume that you're not accessing slashdot through a laptop running on battery power...

      -cmh

    3. Re:Caveat Emptor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT REPLY
      T1 here, slow as molasses in January, as they say.

    4. Re:Caveat Emptor! by Spamhead · · Score: 3, Funny


      O.T. P.S.: is it my connect, or is slashdot slow today?

      Well, Duh. The obvious reason is because somebody at OSDN tripped over the power cord and they are running at half-speed on batteries.

      Either that, or it's that pesky MySQL acting up again...

      --
      Everybody Wang-Chung tonight!
    5. Re:Caveat Emptor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, coming through San Jose, CA, USA. Maybe it has something to do with the recent move? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CSG_Surferdude

    6. Re:Caveat Emptor! by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

      RE: O.T. P.S.

      Its not just you, its slow for me to. Though I can't tell you why. Maybe Slashdot has jet lag from moving out west?

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    7. Re:Caveat Emptor! by mejh · · Score: 1

      "O.T. P.S.: is it my connect, or is slashdot slow today?"

      It has been slow for me (in London) since about midday GMT, both at work (2mbit) and now at home (512k) - i have had quite a few 20-30 second page loads, and even a couple of timeouts! Unheard of before the 'move'.

      M.

    8. Re:Caveat Emptor! by writertype · · Score: 1
      O.T. P.S.: is it my connect, or is slashdot slow today?

      (You can see this one walking up Broadway, can't you?)

      Well, of course it's slow. Slashdot's being Slashdotted, obviously.

    9. Re:Caveat Emptor! by Namtar · · Score: 1

      Slashdot very slow today...

      I wonder if they accidently linked to themselves in one of the stories. I'd love to see the headline: Slashdot slashdotted.

      --
      Linux. Because a 386 is a terrible thing to waste.
  13. why is this a bad thing by JamesCronus · · Score: 0

    i have a laptop with a desktop proccessor, to be honest i dont notice the difference in speed, with normal every day tasks there is no need for the proccessing horsepower. AND i've noticed that i actually get a better battery lifetime on my machine then someone with a 'mobile' chip.... there are advantages to having a desktop proc.

    --
    dybia felly dwi a hampster (i think therefore i am a hampster)
  14. My thoughs by nuggz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well if you can't make it run full speed, and they didn't tell you, return it.
    The article says they clearly state this is the case, maybe they changed something, or you didn't look very hard.

    Either way I'd return it, and ask for one that runs full speed.

    I think this is generally a good idea, the way I use a laptop it would work well. When I am at a proper desk, I do the serious "work" that takes more CPU power, and I'm generally plugged in. When I'm using batteries, it would typically be less demanding applications (reading email, simple quick work in ofice software) and I don't need all that speed. Realistically most computers are overpowered for the work they need to do. Here at work I have a 350MHz Pentium machine, and it works fine.

  15. Caveat Emptor by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 1

    This is common where price is an issue.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  16. I can't be very sympathetic. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. It is called SmartStep. That should have been a major clue.
    2. Common sense would tell you that a desktop processor running at full speed would drain a battery far too quickly.

    1. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Cutriss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      2. Common sense would tell you that a desktop processor running at full speed would drain a battery far too quickly.

      How does this apply to Apple and its PowerBooks/iBooks, which get far greater battery life than PC laptops? Sorry, but that's quite a broad generalization you've got there.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 2, Informative

      The RISC based PowerPC designs run a lot cooler and more energy efficient than any recent Intel/AMD chips. That's why there's no 'mobile' versions of those processors.

      Of course, some smartass is going to say that Macs are running at half speed already. All I can say about that is that my 3 year old iMac runs everything I need pretty good, save for 3D games.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    3. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is called SmartStep. That should have been a major clue.

      I thought that meant it was optimized for running a NeXT platform on!

    4. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have daily experience with hundreds of apple and PC laptops (about 50/50) and honestly the apple's batteries dont last much longer then a quality pc laptop. Apple designs with battery power in mind from the start, many consumer and high performance pc laptops couldn't care less. Some of these will have battery life's 30 minutes. When compared with similiar laptops the Apple battery life isn't anytihng to write home about. I still think the case designs on the Apple laptops are worlds ahead of their pc counterpart.

    5. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my question was actually a rhetorical one. I was basically trying to point out the fact that Apple laptops use the same processors as the desktops, and yet don't have short battery life, which means that his generalization was invalid.

    6. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Graff · · Score: 2
      many consumer and high performance pc laptops couldn't care less. Some of these will have battery life's 30 minutes. When compared with similiar laptops the Apple battery life isn't anytihng to write home about.

      Well, considering that my Apple Titanium PowerBook gets 4 to 5 hours of use consistently out of a full battery, I would say that's something to write home about. There is quite a difference between having 4 hours of use and having 30 minutes of use.

      The great thing is that even with high-drain activities, such as viewing a DVD, you regularly get 2.5 hours of battery time. I'd love to see a similar high-end non-Apple laptop do that. There might be one or two other laptops out there that can do that with only a single stock battery, but I'm sure that they are rare.
    7. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen another laptop that can get 3 hours of disk crunching with the display up the whole time.

      Not to mention the instant sleep/resume feature that dosen't work half as well on any PC laptop I've ever seen.

      Really there isn't a comparison here, it's kind of sad there isn't.

    8. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by crt · · Score: 1

      Probably because the G3/G4 processors already run at half the speed of the comparable Intel processor. No need to downclock them further!

    9. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Bobartig · · Score: 2

      The powerpc G3 and G4 chips were designed to be (among other things) embedded chips where power consumption and heat dissipation are much more important. They do run mobile versions of the G4, like the last couple laptops used 7451, or 7440 G4's, while the desktops used 7450 or 7455 vs. The differences are usually that the mobile versions use less power, and support less L3 cache.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    10. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by __aatskl8715 · · Score: 1

      I will attest to the fact that my iBook gets 4.5 hours of battery life while doing simple things with Airport off. However, apple has the same type of processor speed reduction. In the power management tab of system preferences, there is a selection for "Automatic," "Maximum Performance, or "Energy Saver" modes. I honestly can't tell when it's running faster or slower as in automatic mode the transition is seamless from the user's perspective. This seems like a much better approach to the problem of performance/battery life to me.

    11. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by WaxParadigm · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I borrowed a friend's Dell laptop (Inspiron 4000/4100 or something like that) about a year ago for a business trip I had to take before my employer had given me a laptop. He had the dual batteries (main battery + one in liu of floppy or CD/dvd). I forgot my ac adapter and still managed to get in a full ~8-hour day of work on that puppy. On the plane, it was no problem to watch a full DVD with just one of the two batteries in.

      I'm sad that my current laptop only gets like 2.5 hours...but that's life when you're not buying your own equipment. If these 30-minute battery life quotes are not from very old P2 laptops...shame on the manufacturers.

      - Me

    12. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Stigmata669 · · Score: 2

      Apple laptops have a speed throttle in the Energy Saver control pannel, however selecting the High Preformance setting yields the same preformance as when it is pluged in. The real key to saving battery is the display. If you are working indoors, dim the screen, and reap the spoils.

      --
      Yawn.
    13. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      You missed my point. I was saying that some pc's arent designed to conserve battery life. If you get one that is, they can match the performance of Apple laptops. All the anecdotal "I can watch 3 dvds back to back on my mac!" evidence doesn't matter when you are comparing a little iBook to a 2ghz Dell latitude with a 17" monitor. They are different laptops designed for different purposes.

    14. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a smartass! :-D

    15. Re:I can't be very sympathetic. by Graff · · Score: 2
      All the anecdotal "I can watch 3 dvds back to back on my mac!" evidence doesn't matter when you are comparing a little iBook to a 2ghz Dell latitude with a 17" monitor.

      The difference is that I'm not doing that sort of comparison. I'm comparing Apple's top-of-the-line Titanium Powerbook to anyone else's top laptop, including a 2gHz Dell Latitude with a 15" display (they don't make one with a 17" display). The laptops may have slightly different design purposes, but they aren't that different. Each one is designed to have as many features as possible but still to be able to be toted around and used anywhere it is needed.

      Yes, some pc-clones laptops are not designed to have long battery life, but what's the point of a laptop that needs to be charged every 30 minutes? A laptop is supposed to free you of the need for being pinned down in one location, not for the need to always be near a power outlet.

      Now, I'm not sure of the battery life on the Dell machine, but what I am sure of is that the Powerbook gets 4 or 5 hours run time per charged battery. This is not anecdotal evidence, it is highly repeatable and can be seen in every Titanium Powerbook out there. Combine this with all of the features contained in such a compact, durable, and beautiful form-factor and you may be able to see why I use a Powerbook. If you have another laptop which suits your needs that is fine, but if that laptop only lasts half an hour then I'm sure you will find it tough to use it wherever and whenever you want.
  17. My laptop... by program21 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    has the same feature (Compaq Armada E500), although you need to enable it by installing a SpeedStep (I believe is the name) 'applet' from Intel (it's a PIII chip).
    I don't see why you would need it to run at the full speed on battery anyway. If you're doing something CPU-intensive enough to need the full speed of the chip, then you can almost certainly plug it in; for most other things, half speed is more than enough and doesn't even get noticed. It's not like you're only running with half the RAM active or something like that.

    In fact, you mentioned that you saw it on THG. Did you notice it at all yourself when using the laptop? Or did it run just as well, and you just like getting offended at these sort of things (which seems like exactly what you're doing here).

    --
    This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    1. Re:My laptop... by A+Commentor · · Score: 2
      My laptop... has the same feature (Compaq Armada E500), although you need to enable it by installing a SpeedStep


      No it doesn't... did you even read the article? Mobile chips have the Speedstep function, that function is not on desktop chips, so to save some money Dell is using a some hack to the bios to effectively throttle the desktop CPU.

      I also bet your laptop doesn't lose half of it's speed, my 700 MHz PIII goes down to 550 when on battery mode, not 350.

      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    2. Re:My laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn, I'm sick of people who claim computers are so fast that halving the speed wouldn't even be noticeable... bullshit. BULL. SHIT. It is PAINFUL to deal with my own laptop when it drops to 'battery' speed. I know exactly where the author is coming from, although I'm a bit surprised he didn't know about this beforehand.

      At some point, too many people got complacent and just accepted that applications should take 5 minutes to load. You've got to wonder what's wrong with people when they upgrade to a machine in excess of 1Ghz, and don't even complain when Word takes less than an eyeblink to start.

    3. Re:My laptop... by program21 · · Score: 2

      At some point writing I must have forgotten that it was a desktop CPU in the article. Point conceded :)
      You're also right about the half thing, my 800MHz goes down to 550 or 600, I believe.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    4. Re:My laptop... by MR.Gates · · Score: 1

      I have a Toshiba 3005-S307 PIII 1.13 (Linux only). When I start it up on battery it's running at 750Mhz. Not bad really, first few time I didn't even notice it. It seems to get 2.5 - 3.5 hours of battery life. I watched LOTR & surfed, at a friends house, before it started beeping like mad about the battery.

      --

      A few hours grace before the madness begins again.
    5. Re:My laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If half of 2.2 GHz is more than enough for you, than what you need is called a "1.1 GHz laptop", plain and simple. There's no need for any advertising bullshit.

    6. Re:My laptop... by zardie · · Score: 1

      I agree that we're getting a tad off topic here but Dell do not provide any such mechanism under Windows XP to force speedstep settings to full power. I believe their 'SmartStep' notebooks are the same - a quick hack is done at BIOS level and can't be changed.

      Dell do not offer an easy way of forcing CPU power to full on battery under Windows XP with speedstep enabled. Sometimes I like to lower my CPU if I'm only typing documents or increase if if I'm doing on-the-run firewire video editing.
      Toshiba on the other hand offer a speedstep utility even under Windows XP which let me throw the CPU into full power mode at the expense of battery life.

      For the record, I am comparing my Dell Inspiron 8200 with a Toshiba Satellite Pro 6100 both running Windows XP.

  18. Here is INTEL's LINK: by mekkab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a clear explanation of SpeedStep, it says as clear as day "You 500 mhz chip will operate at 300 mhz speeds"

    I don't mean to give anyone a hard time but if you are going to spend more than $100 (or 0x64 dollars for that stupid hex guy) you would save a lot of aggrevation by doing some research.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Here is INTEL's LINK: by PurpleBob · · Score: 4, Funny

      $100 (or 0x64 dollars for that stupid hex guy)

      Don't encourage him.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    2. Re:Here is INTEL's LINK: by _Swank · · Score: 1

      you are completely correct. that is a VERY clear explanation of speedstep. which is why it amazes me that you think it applies to desktop CPUs which is what both the submitter and the article are taking issue with. speedstep is for mobile CPUs only. a little bit of research into page seven (or 0x7 for that stupid hex guy) would save us all some aggravation.

    3. Re:Here is INTEL's LINK: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The laptop in question isn't a SpeedStep, but a "SmartStep". SmartStep is apparently just a Dell marketing buzzword that is deceptively similar to SpeedStep.

    4. Re:Here is INTEL's LINK: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to do some research yourself before you write a post. This chip does not use Speedstep. There is no mention of Speedstep on the webpage for this product. This is in fact a desktop chip stuffed into a laptop hardwired to run at half speed when unplugged *without letting the user do anything about it*

    5. Re:Here is INTEL's LINK: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the HELL did you get moderated to +5?


      If you read the Intel link which you posted it says you can control the clock speed by choosing either "Battery optimised mode" to reduce the clock speed and save power or "Maximum performance mode" to run at full clock speed.

      Yes you can run your mobile CPU at its full rated clock speed whenever you want but your batteries won't last as long as in the low power mode


      Its hilarious that you chastise someone for not researching when you are clearly too dim to even read the page you are refering to, clear as day? Must be a foggy day fuckwit

    6. Re:Here is INTEL's LINK: by mekkab · · Score: 2

      nah, this applies to Timothy's 1 line rant about his old toshiba (which was a speed step)

      My comments on the smart step were labeled "From Dell's website" which states at the bottom "processor speed slower on batteries"

      Go to dells website, search for SmartStep.

      You get what you deserve.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  19. What about the speed of the mobile P4? by gozar · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I don't think any manufacturer specifies the speed of the machine to get the maximum amount of battery life, this article does not tell us what the speed of the mobile P4 is while it is in energy saving mode...

    There are many reasons why Dell wants to put a desktop CPU in the machine, why don't they give the user the option of running it at full speed while on battery sacrificing battery life. I know my Apple PowerBook gives me several options on energy consumption while on battery, including running full out.

    Anyway, no manufacturer states the speed of their machine while on battery. They usually state the battery life depends on configuration and use. Dell is no different. If you go to the specifications page on the 250N you will see that it states that Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery. It's not like they are hiding this information from the purchaser, learn to read the fine print. I don't think that this is enough to get that excited about...

    --
    What, me worry?
  20. Toshiba troubles? You're not alone. by vaxer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend of mine went through hell trying to get any customer service from Toshiba. Even when they finally agreed that he deserved a replacement, he got censored (and censured) for telling other customers.

  21. You think THAT'S bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an IBM Thinkpad 600E. This is a circa-1999 laptop, and pretty nice in general. EXCEPT FOR THE SOUND CARD.

    You see, the 600E was done on the CHEAP by IBM. They threw an ISA bus in there for the sound card, making it a hard-to-configure-by-OSS-and-ALSA pain in the BUTT. Why? Because it is an ISAPNP (plug-n-pray) device. That's right--in 1999-2000, IBM was putting ISA bus devices in their laptops. There is NO good reason (beyond being CHEAP) for an ISA bus to be in ANYTHING in this day and age.

    Pissed? You bet. The only way to make the soundcard work is to use the 2.4.19-ac series kernel, because Alan Cox is testing a special PNPBIOS enhancement--the only thing that makes these chips work.

    1. Re:You think THAT'S bad... by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      Please do share details of this. I also have a 600E, and I'm having a bitch of a time getting sound to work. BTW, I'm using Gentoo.

      Email to my profile address if you like.

    2. Re:You think THAT'S bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple solution: Install Windows 2000. Finds and installs sound drivers perfectly on install without any prompting whatsoever.

    3. Re:You think THAT'S bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Off. If he'd wanted to use inferior Windows crap, he'd be doing it.

    4. Re:You think THAT'S bad... by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      I've got one myself and it runs Mandrake 9 very happily. On the contrary it's quite well built, and designed in Japan and not Taiwan like most new notebooks ;)

      1999 was basically the last year for ISA sound cards in general. The ISA chip works pretty well once it's configured. Now if only I could trade out the Neomagic video chip for a Radeon Mobility M9 ;)

      It's not nearly as bad as my prior laptop - a circa 1997 Toshiba Tecra (high end, definitely not a cheap build either) with ISA IDE. No DMA *at all*...

      If you do some quick googling you can get the default sound card port settings and how to set it up with either ALSA or OSS.

      for alsa in modules.conf : options snd-card-cs4236 snd_port=0x530 snd_cport=0x538 snd_irq=5 snd_dma1=1 snd_dma2=0 snd_fm_port=0x388

      for oss: options cs4232 io=0x530 irq=5 dma=1 dma2=0

  22. Turn it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you are talking/asking about is called "Speed Step" it's there to help prolong your battery life. If you want the computer to run full tilt all the time just turn off this feature, I have an HP Omnibook 6000 with this feature and under W2K the is an icon for controlling the speed of the uP.

    1. Re:Turn it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article

  23. Good ole speed-step technology. by Angelwrath · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, all of Intel's mobile chips have this so-called Speed-Step "technology". An unusual way to describe a core clock throttle, but alright. When you're plugged into the wall, you run at the chip's advertised core clock, but use battery power and it scales down to some fraction of that.

    Intel doesn't even advertise the lower core clock speed anymore for the P4, but on the P3-M 1 GHZ, the technology dropped the chip to 733 MHz when on battery power.

    Pentium4 2.2 GHz tech specs.

    1. Re:Good ole speed-step technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE SO DUMB! Mobile chips are not the issue! The article is about *desktop* chips being sold in *laptops*. READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE!

    2. Re:Good ole speed-step technology. by Isle · · Score: 2

      No this is called SmartStep, why do you presume to be so much smarter than everyone else without even reading the article?

      SpeedStep is controllable and disable-able, SmartStep is not. That's the problem.

    3. Re:Good ole speed-step technology. by Angelwrath · · Score: 2

      "No this is called SmartStep, why do you presume to be so much smarter than everyone else without even reading the article?"

      If you can read from a post on some website that someone is presuming to be mucch smarter than everyone else, my hat is off to you.

      As for whether it's one or the other, the fact is, the article was a complaint about the chip running slower when it runs off battery power. SpeedStep, SmartStep, it doesn't make any difference - disable SpeedStep so it runs at full core clock, and you get less battery time than advertised, so the customer has the same complaint.

      I suggest you read what the person says more carefully, and skip your own presumptions about what the thread author thinks.

  24. Toshiba: Pretty but Fragil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Buy a ThinkPad next time

  25. Moderators! RTFA! by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Score: 5, Informative should, in this case, be Score: -1, Didn't Read The F'ing Article.

    I quote:
    That means that the processor only receives "its" speed half of the time. This behavior is controlled via the chipset. The disadvantage of this power-saving mechanism is that the user cannot influence it. In other words: in SmartStep, the processor runs only at half-speed in battery operation. Although that needn't be an issue when running simple office applications, anyone who uses the CPU primarily to run intensive applications - and wants to do this on the road - will be bitterly disappointed by the device's performance.
    and
    The user does not have the option of running the SmartStep on battery at the advertised speed of 2.2GHz at the expense of battery-running time. The advantage of the quick processor is thus lost in mobile operation. We find the fact that Dell fails to clearly point out this special "feature" pretty shameless, to put it mildly.
    So no, it is not a good feature for this laptop.
    --
    four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    1. Re:Moderators! RTFA! by jukal · · Score: 3, Funny
      Score: 5, Informative should, in this case, be Score: -1, Didn't Read The F'ing Article.

      Yes after reading the article in more details, apparently my previous post was crap. Please mod it down, it's misleading. Sorry.

    2. Re:Moderators! RTFA! by Kanagawa · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why everyone is complaining. My Intel Pentium III with Speedstep runs perfectly well under linux and winders. And, I have complete control over the power management settings. If you're curious about the ongoing development of the linux kernel drivers to support speedstep and similar technologies from AMD and others look here. These drivers are available in the 2.4.19 kernel.

      Now, caveat emptor, the linux drivers (at least) are still very much in development. Intel has (god bless them) chosen to withhold specifciations for SpeedStep and the cpufreq project is, therefore, having to reverse engineer them.

      But, I find this feature to be very cool -- it helps my laptop run longer on battery power, which road-warriors like myself really appreciate. Especially during cross country flights. Ugh. Nothing like 6 hours to kill and no computer to code on, right? ;-)

      If you are finding you can't run (say) XP with all those fading menus and visual candy canes, then you have my sympathy. Honestly. Go buy yourself a new laptop, its sure to fix whatever problems you're having with the current one.

      --
      "He wrested the world's whereabouts from the heavens And locked the secret in a pocketwatch." - Dava Sobel
    3. Re:Moderators! RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpeedStep != SmartStep. RTFA.

  26. just a whole lotta whining by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a *WELL* publicized fact that laptops use power management in order to extend battery life. I mean, people deliberately go out and buy ultra-low voltage P3s with speedstep because they need the battery life...

    Besides, it's pretty well known that *most* laptop action occurs in the *indoors* near "power outlets".

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:just a whole lotta whining by prockcore · · Score: 2

      It's a *WELL* publicized fact that laptops use power management in order to extend battery life.

      That reminds me, whenever I leave my computer alone for extended periods of time, like say 10 minutes, it turns off my screen. I didn't pay $2000 for a computer that can't even keep images on the screen for longer than 10 minutes without me babysitting it!

    2. Re:just a whole lotta whining by Jus+ad+Bellum · · Score: 1

      It's a *WELL* publicized fact that laptops use power management in order to extend battery life. I mean, people deliberately go out and buy ultra-low voltage P3s with speedstep because they need the battery life... Besides, it's pretty well known that *most* laptop action occurs in the *indoors* near "power outlets".


      You're one of those guys who use finger quotes a lot when your talking right???

    3. Re:just a whole lotta whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless ad for Laptop says: "2GHz Mobile P4 (1.2GHz when using battery mode)", then it's isn't a "WELL publicized fast".

  27. you have to be kidding. by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in IT for a law firm. If any lawyer came up to me and asked for a laptop that did NOT have this feature (or to turn it off), I would laugh in their face. How hard is it to understand: 1) Computers have so much speed now that only the most graphic intensive game or the most complex calculations are going to come close to pushing their limit. 2) Batteries have not kept up with chips, and thus have laughable capacities for the things you use. 3) Unless you carry spare fully charged batteries with you, you have to be a moron not to use the incredibally helpfull feature that you are complaining about. Even if you are playing Doom, it is far better to play Doom for 2 hours with a slight jerkiness and speed reduction, than to lose power and have to kill the game 1 hour into your 2 hour train ride.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:you have to be kidding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, of course, you know better than the owner how they should use their computer.

    2. Re:you have to be kidding. by mosch · · Score: 1, Troll

      instead of laughing in their face (so professional!), why not buy them a mac? iBooks and TiBooks both have good battery lives, and they don't throttle back the processor because of poor processor engineering.

    3. Re:you have to be kidding. by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I can not generally say I know better than all owners, I can generally say that I know better than any person who: 1) Did not research his purchase enough to discover this feature before hand. 2) Does not see that in 99% of the cases, it is a HUGE benefit instead of the rather minor problem. 3) Considering how unusual and rare their computational needs are, did not go out of his way to make sure they got what they needed, instead of what was standard.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    4. Re:you have to be kidding. by nolife · · Score: 2

      Even if you are playing Doom, it is far better to play Doom for 2 hours with a slight jerkiness and speed reduction, than to lose power and have to kill the game 1 hour into your 2 hour train ride.

      I too work for a law firm. It's far better to have the computer setup that that user CAN NOT even get Doom on their computer! Different environments call for different configurations I guess. Hell, I'd volunteer to beta test the Doom software push in the environment! It was a little rough switching to a lockdown mode a few years ago but we had support from many of the main partners. It's the norm now, there are very very few exceptions and no one complains anymore.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:you have to be kidding. by tapin · · Score: 1
      I haven't done any research on this whatsoever, but could you explain the difference between this SpeedStep stuff and the "Processor Performance" pulldown on the Energy Saver -> Options tab in System Preferences on my new TiBook?

      (The options are "Highest" and "Reduced", with no indication of what they're actually referring to)

      Either way, you're definitely right about the "good battery lives" bit... I can usually watch nearly two full DVDs on a single battery, which has been extremely useful for longer flights.

    6. Re:you have to be kidding. by mosch · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, the answer is that sometimes they're quite similar... On the 800Mhz, reduced drops it down to 667, and turns off the L3 cache. On a 667, it just turns off the L3 cache.

      My point was that the powerbooks get good battery life even without flipping it down to reduced, when it comes to trolling I admit nothing... nothing!

    7. Re:you have to be kidding. by scrutty · · Score: 1
      I think that on a G4 800 powerbook the CPU clock drops to 666 and the L3 cache is disabled.

      On a 666 its just the L3 cache that gets disabled. I think this is documented somewhere on the Apple tech site.

      --
      -- Oh Well
    8. Re:you have to be kidding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather play a computer game smoothly for and hour, and then pull out a book and read for the rest of the trip. Choppy games can be hell on your eyes.

    9. Re:you have to be kidding. by demonbug · · Score: 1
      I work in IT for a law firm.


      Thats nice, but what does it have to do with anything? Are you a lawyer?


      How hard is it to understand: 1) Computers have so much speed now that only the most graphic intensive game or the most complex calculations are going to come close to pushing their limit. 2) Batteries have not kept up with chips, and thus have laughable capacities for the things you use. 3) Unless you carry spare fully charged batteries with you, you have to be a moron not to use the incredibally helpfull feature that you are complaining about.


      You don't get it. This doesn't have to do with whether it is a helpful feature or not; it has to do with whether Dell accurately portrays in its marketing what you are buying. They claim that the laptop runs at 2.2 Ghz, making no mention of the fact that this only happens when it is plugged in to an outlet. This would be like a car company claiming that their car can accelerate from 0-100 mph in 5 seconds, but failing to mention you will only get this acceleration if youdrive off a cliff. To most drivers it doesn't actually matter how long it takes to get to 100mph, because it is illegal to do so, but it is reasonable for them to expect the car to be able to achieve the claimed performance under normal conditions (i.e., not a special circumstance).

      Even if you are playing Doom, it is far better to play Doom for 2 hours with a slight jerkiness and speed reduction, than to lose power and have to kill the game 1 hour into your 2 hour train ride.


      This is purely your own opinion, and has nothing to do with the validity of the manufacturer's claim. From what Dell says about the notebook, it is reasonable for a person to EXPECT to be able to play Doom at full speed for 1 hour rather than with jerkiness for 2 hours, whether or not this decision is "better" or "worse", which is purely subjective.

    10. Re:you have to be kidding. by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      How about PowerPC chips?

      Apple uses full desktop versions and they are NOT crippled in their laptops like this.

      This is what happens when you have a chip that runs too hot.

    11. Re:you have to be kidding. by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      This is just processor cycling.

      All this does is doesn't waste cycles when on batter power if on. You can have it on or off. Up to you.

      Basically, what this does is when the chip isn't being used, it puts it to sleep.

      This sort of thing can save battery power.

      The chip itself is not crippled, this cycling feature is present in chips Apple has used for many years. It isn't new.

      If you need the processor not to go to sleep when not in use, just turn this off.

      FWIW, you can turn this feature on on desktops but, it isn't on by default.

    12. Re:you have to be kidding. by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      I forgot, Apple doesn't enable turning this on in desktops by their software but, it is there in the chips.

      On all Apple portables, you can disable or enable it using Energy Saver.

    13. Re:you have to be kidding. by Grab · · Score: 2

      Running hot isn't the issue, it's running at high speed. The faster the clock, the more power it takes. So to save battery, they run it slower. They're not running it slower just to keep it cooler. The heatsink fan takes naff all power compared to a GHz processor.

      This may not be much of an issue for Apple because a PowerBook only runs 800MHz. Even a "crippled" SpeedStep processor these days will likely be going faster than that. Whether you get as much processing for your clock rate is a separate argument altogether.

      Grab.

  28. No difference between mobile/desktop CPU by t0qer · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's not a whole lotta difference between "mobile" and desktop processors other than packaging.

    Desktop CPU's use PGA's that were designed for socketed use. The extra 4 millimeters from the pins sticking out is worth it because it means the CPU can be swapped in and out. Flexibility is the goal here.

    Mobile processors usually come in a BGA package because they're soldered directly to the motherboard via wave solder, or UV cured solder. Since they don't have that extra 4 millimeters of pins sticking out the bottom, their profile is smaller than that of a desktop processor.

    Right now though, it seems a lot of manufacturers are at least trying to make the newer laptops as flexible as a desktop by offering expansion busses to replace the laptops video card, processor, ram ect.

    Remember 7 or 8 years ago when you wanted to get laptop memory? Everytime you wanted to upgrade you would have to order a custom stick because the manufacturers were all doing their own thing. Back then they thought they had to keep every vertical market on their laptop to themselves. There were a few exceptions to this rule (chembook was one of the first to start using standard desktop parts in their laptops)

    I don't think it's a bad thing either... Sorta lets you get more life outta your laptop.

    1. Re:No difference between mobile/desktop CPU by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um actually the CPU's are very different. Mobile P4's for instance use a lower core voltage. Other generations of mobile Intel cpu's have been based on smaller processes then their desktop brethren, or they have had fewer functional units. Another difference is speedstep, the mobile cpu's have the speedstep circuitry built in, the desktop cpu's do not, hence this article. For everyone that can't read what happens when you use a speedstep chipset with a non speedstep cpu is that the cpu gets stuck in the lower speed processing mode and cannot return to normal processing state without a reboot whereas the mobile cpu's will return to full speed with a simple software controll.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:No difference between mobile/desktop CPU by earlytime · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually,

      Mobile cpus have a pretty good bit of modificaton over desktops cpus, primarily designed to reduce heat. cuz the cooler it runs, the faster it can run safely in a laptop enclosure.

      1. basic voltage reductions/optimizations
      2. some mobile cpus can switch off idle units
      3. mobile cpus generally have different on chip
      cache sizes than their desktop equivalents
      4. the ability to change speeds/voltages on the fly

      Tom's Hardware talks about some of this stuff in this article.

      --

    3. Re:No difference between mobile/desktop CPU by workindev · · Score: 1

      There's not a whole lotta difference between "mobile" and desktop processors other than packaging.

      This is just plain wrong. Package type has no bearing on power consumption. The Mobile processors are designed to run at a reduced core voltage, have additional "SpeedStep" circuitry, a more advanced power management module, and are tested to tighter current specifications. The result is a chip that consumes around 20 Watts, or 1/3 what a desktop Pentium 4 consumes.

    4. Re:No difference between mobile/desktop CPU by will · · Score: 1


      For everyone that can't read what happens when you use a speedstep chipset with a non speedstep cpu is that...

      and for those of you watching in black and white, the green ball is the one behind the blue.

      (sorry. you had to be in england in the 70's for this one.)

  29. You are dirty! by YahoKa · · Score: 0

    This is why you read THG BEFORE buying. Also read anandtech. I was reading it yesterday and i learned this from their articles ...
    At least you know enough to figure this out. Most people who own the laptops will never know.

  30. One more comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with subject: "Caveat Emptor" and I'll club you all to death!!

  31. Idiots... by Mantrid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This article doesn't make any sense. Why is it posted on Slashdot?

    'Desktop CPU stuffed into your laptop' - what exactly is this supposed to mean anyways? Why would you complain about that? Did you want an Alpha in there instead, or a nice 8088? Am I missing something here?

    Speed step slows your processor down to save batteries. It's a very handy feature, but is easily disabled if you need a speed burst while on batteries. I'm not sure what you're trying to do with it, but personally extra battery life is more important than extra FPS in Quake or whatever.

    So what is your complaint? That you're having problems with your laptop? Try writing something informative on that instead of ill-informed ranting!

    Oh and you'd better check into your laptop and make sure that 16MB of RAM isn't mysteriously missing...and added to your video RAM.

    1. Re:Idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a very handy feature, but is easily disabled if you need a speed burst while on batteries.

      Did you RFTA? It can NOT be disabled, so they can NEVER utilize the full speed while running off the battery.

    2. Re:Idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RTFA before you call people idiots. This is not a SpeedStep processor, and thus no SpeedStep control panel to tell the computer "hey, go ahead and run at full speed, I don't mind"

      The computer is a "SmartStep", which is Dell's way of saying "make sure you read all the fine print, because this computer runs slow on battery and there's nothing you can do about it."

      idiot.

    3. Re:Idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you are an idiot yourself ;)
      If you still havent't got the point the problem is that the _DESKTOP_ edition of a processor has been placed in CPU instead of _MOBILE_. And yes - it matters and is faily incorrect, since
      a) desktop chips conserve more power (ok - more computing power there is as well - sort of)
      b) they cannot adjust themselves to the power requirments (not SpeedStep - just a YourCpuDontWorksHalfTheTimeAndYouSuck)...
      Actuall y with mobile edition running at full speed they should be able to get better battery life and performance than desktop at half speed. Thiese are different markets and different requirments - and totally different implementations - until now...

      Karlos

  32. Dell steered me away from Smartstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently bought a 8200 Dell laptop with a
    2.0mhz P4 M. When I first called Dell, I asked about the 250 N SmartStep. After I explained my purpose for the computer, they steered me away from it. The price was within 50.$, after all the specials. But, stay away from the preferred(?!)account billing option. Just another high interest credit card.

    The system control panel does allow me to adjust for maximum performance.

  33. Your analogy is bad by mekkab · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is labed as a "SmartStep" computer.
    Do a little research on the net.

    FROM Dell's WEbsite:
    Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery.

    You have no legal recourse when they make full disclosure.

    These are manufactured in bulk, not like a house. Besides, you wouldn't actually buy your house without a final walkthrough! Your legal recourse would be to not buy the house!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  34. general public? by _anomaly_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    calling the /. crowd the "general public" is a bit of a stretch, don't ya think? :-P

    --
    "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:general public? by Skirwan · · Score: 2
      calling the /. crowd the "general public" is a bit of a stretch, don't ya think? :-P
      Actually, General Public is CmdrTaco's commanding officer. He's one of the secretive figures in the shadow government agency that actually runs Slashdot. I'm told he's helped out occasionally by General Protection Fault and Colonel Panic.

      No really, I read it on a website!

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
  35. Toshiba 5005-S504 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got one of these desktop processors in a Toshiba S504 laptop. To prevent overheating while playing games, I have to throttle back the processor to speed 2 (7 be the slowest). If the room is hot, it is impossible to play.
    The machine has never run under load at its rated 1.1 Ghz. Isn't this false advertising? Toshiba should burn for this. I will never buy from them again.

  36. So what are you gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an hp pavillion ze1210 with a mobile athlon xp 1400+, only to find out that my bios doesn't know the chip has sse support, and any fix i try to find leaves the computer unstable. do you think hp cares about their customers either? all the big companies care to do is to give you less than you pay for so they can make more money, it's called business.

  37. Then get a better laptop then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, Sony vaios are the best laptops you can buy! My PCG-FX401 may be the low end version. but with a 800 mhz amd duron it FLYS along with Mandrake 9.0!

  38. And DELL's Link by mekkab · · Score: 3, Informative

    From Dell's online ordering: Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery.

    There is no excuse for not reading this.
    If you wonder "Gee, how much does it limit processor speed?" You should put down your credit card and start researching.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:And DELL's Link by Blkdeath · · Score: 5, Informative
      From Dell's online ordering [dell.com]: Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery.

      There is no excuse for not reading this.
      If you wonder "Gee, how much does it limit processor speed?" You should put down your credit card and start researching.

      When I bought my laptop (a Toshiba Satellite, which I'm exceptionally pleased with, FWIW) I asked questions, compared it with the laptops in the store, and understood what the differences were. I also got assurance from the sales person that I could return it within 30 days for a FULL MONEY BACK REFUND if I was not satisfied with the purchase. For the next 29 days, I proceeded to, figuritively speaking, beat the snot out of it. I used it on battery, experimented with power saving features, read the manual cover to cover, exploited all the features of it, installed Linux (to the point where every piece of hardware was fully functional). In short, I made sure that my laptop suited all of my needs, and if not, that I had recourse so that I could exchange it for one that did.

      It's a year and a half later (halfway through my warranty - eep!) and I'm still just as happy with it as the day I got it.

      Point being; I did my research beforehand (it was actually about 2 months before I bought it. As a result of my patience, I got an extra 200MHz, 5GB of HDD space, and double the RAM), then I made sure I was satisfied with my purchase before it was too late.

      For all who've said 'Caveat Emptor' - good on you. Merely having a credit card isn't a license to spend money like it's going out of style. Spend wisely, think before you buy, and most important of all pay attention.

      (And yes, Slashdot was slow for me all day on a 3MB connection)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:And DELL's Link by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      I'm still enjoying (and currently using) my Toshiba Satellite 2805-201s I bought Feb 2001. I've replaced the motherboard twice under warranty (exact trade, unforunately; still running the 650 MHz SpeedStep). I've maxed the memory and changed the HD. . .oh and replaced WinME with Windows 2000/Linux 2.4.x, both of which run much better than WinME on this baby.

      I switched to a TiBook G4 for a while (see my journal) but switched back to the Toshiba -- I saw the TiBook today with the designer I sold it too; it's running 10.2 now and has 1 GB RAM and runs so much faster than when I had it (768 MB and 10.1.5), but I still prefer the Toshiba.

      SpeedStep was a clearly-explained technology when I bought my 2805. It's hard to believe that a reasonable person would have missed it before purchasing it. That said, unless I'm in the single-seat library or similarly indisposed I'm plugged in. Especially for initial boot of the OS and GUI. . .

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  39. Switch Ad by ericdano · · Score: 5, Funny
    Oh, this sounds like PERFECT fodder for a Apple Switch Ad.

    "Like, I went to the store to buy this laptop, and uh, like I got it home, and figured out that if you didn't have it plugged into the wall, it runs like, um, half speed. *insert slow wierd sound here*

    So, I returned it and bought an Apple iBook. I unplugged it from like the wall, and *insert strange zippy sound here* it was still running like at full speed.

    I'm John, and I'm a certified Pron watcher."

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Switch Ad by skribble · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two things...

      First, Megahertz Myth aside, an iBook running at full speed would still likely be slower the a P4-2Ghz system running at half speed... Remember iBooks still us G3 processors. (Now iBooks have up to 6 hour battery life, run a better OS, and are just cool... but from a performance standpoint...)

      Second, Macs can also run with reduced processor performace to add battery life... It's an option in the OS X 'Energy Saver' control panel. No idea if it's default or not.

      --
      --- Nothing To See Here ---
    2. Re:Switch Ad by Chad+Page · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, I bet the 512K L2, 700mhz iBook will outrun a P4 at 1ghz pretty easily. You gotta deflate P4 mhz against P3's and Athlons, which don't do quite as much per clock as a G3. So the P4 at 1.0 would be roughly equiv to a 500-600mhz G3.

      Now, a P3-M/1.0 would be a different story.

    3. Re:Switch Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hardly... I would like to see some benchmarks.

      I have benchmarked my 450 Mhz G3 and it is no faster than my 450 Mhz P2 (yes, Pentium 2). In fact, the P2 is a little faster (could be OS X overhead, I dunno).

    4. Re:Switch Ad by okeby235 · · Score: 1

      Actually Macs do something similar with their laptops. Have a look under the 'Energy Saver' control panel in OS 9 and OS X.

    5. Re:Switch Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm John, and I'm a certified Pron watcher.

      Just how does one get certified anyway?

    6. Re:Switch Ad by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      First, Megahertz Myth aside...

      You gotta deflate P4 mhz against P3's and Athlons, which don't do quite as much per clock as a G3.

      Do your lickable buttons have lead paint?

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    7. Re:Switch Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, you made a mistake. Here's what you must have meant: "So, I returned it and bought an Apple iBook. I plugged it into like the wall, and *insert strange zippy sound here* it was still running like at half speed."

    8. Re:Switch Ad by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      No it wasn't.

      The processor would be running at full speed unless you turned processor cycling on.

      Now if processor cycling is on it just puts the processor to sleep if idle for a set period of time. It isn't the same thing.

  40. Slashdot's server in battery mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's soooo sloooooooooow. How slow is it? It takes 3 years to write a first post!

  41. Why you might want a desktop CPU in your laptop by wglass · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's an interesting article on this. It's by a seller of discount laptops so it's a little biased, but still interesting. Main points-- (1) a desktop CPU is cheaper, (2) many users have their laptops plugged in so power consumption is less relevant and (3) even desktop CPU's use less power than older CPUs.

    http://www.powernotebooks.com/P4_Truth.php3

    WILL

    1. Re:Why you might want a desktop CPU in your laptop by ruiner13 · · Score: 2

      Here's an article that says the mobile P4 actually is the same desktop part, just test at lower powers after production and hence get approved for mobile use (half-way through the article).

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

  42. Battery life is pathetic anyway by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Laptops are "portable" computers, but not really "mobile". The distinction, as I see it, lies in the fact that even with a fully charged batteries, many laptops don't give very useful operating times unless you're plugged in to an AC outlet.

    Assuming you can find an outlet wherever you're likely to want to use your PC, laptops can be a decent choice. But without access to an AC outlet, you're not going to find a laptop to be useful for more than 30-40 minutes or so.

    I can't tell you how many times I've had my laptop just shut down with no warning because the AC cable was loose and I didn't notice, and I'd only been using the computer for maybe 20-30 minutes.

    So that's why I say a laptop is portable, but not mobile. You can't really go that far with one while it's umbilical is plugged in, so it's not really fair to call a laptop mobile.

    And, if you're going to be plugged in 90% + of the time you're using it, then you're not going to have to deal with the reduced performance issue anyway.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, depends on your laptop, eh?

      I get about ~4 hours on dual batteries, that is w/a speedstep P4 1.9Ghz CPU... Dell too...

      On the last model, I was getting only about 20-30minutes, turns out the battery had developped a memory, bought a new battery, and I started getting 1.5hrs...

    2. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 2

      Get a laptop with a Transmeta chip. I have a Fujitsu P-2046 with an 800 mhz Crusoe, and it goes all day (they rate it at 14 hours, I get around 10 with full brightness, and close to 15 when it's closed and just playing MP3's). They use a similar technology to Intel's speedstep, except that it will scale all the way up to 100% of rated speed if needed (I don't think Intel's will do this). Also, you can select how high you want it to scale (in Linux, there's a simple utility to do this).

    3. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
      But without access to an AC outlet, you're not going to find a laptop to be useful for more than 30-40 minutes or so

      Most laptops run from 2 to 4 hours without AC. Mine runs over 2 hours at 2/3s speed. The laptop mentioned in the article runs 2h 47m. I'm not sure what's wrong with your laptop or why you posted without RTFA, but those are your problems not mine.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    4. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by mosch · · Score: 2
      30 to 40 minutes? you need a new laptop, my friend.

      My TiBook can watch just under 2 DVDs, full-screen, before the battery goes out. That's probably around 3 1/2 hours or so. Enjoy your "portable" computer, I'll enjoy my "mobile" laptop.

    5. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by yoel · · Score: 1

      Dude, there's something wrong with your laptop. My Thinkpad routinely gets 2 1/2 hours on battery under Linux. My PowerBook gets 3+ hours under OSX. Maybe it's time for a new battery? They do wear out over time.

    6. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of POS laptops are you running? My Dell Inspiron 8100 with a nice bright 15" display plays 120 minutes DVD on battery easily. At 1GHz. And yes, without AC.

      Your point remains valid though.

    7. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by tvsjr · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, for most laptop/notebook users, finding the happy medium is important. Most people want hours of battery life in a tiny package with extreme performance. You may choose any two.

      I use a Latitude C840, with dual batteries and a permanently mounted DVD/CD-RW. For travel, it weighs around 15lbs., but I have P4/2.0GHz performance, 1GB SDRAM, 60GB HD, and 6-7 hours of battery life (depending on usage).

      If you want long battery life and small size, you have to sacrifice performance.

      The first person/compnay that builds a small machine with tons of battery life and great performance will make billions overnight. Or, they might get stoned in the public square for violating the laws of physics. But, I prattle on...

    8. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by andrewski · · Score: 1

      4 and 1/2 hours. That's how long it took my TIbook (DVI) to notify me that it was running on batteries. I had dual displays going (it was on my desktop), blaring MP3's, external USB mouse, and downloading shit like all get out.

      Maybe your computer should be wedged under the short leg of your kitchen table where it belongs.

    9. Re:Battery life is pathetic anyway by SoumyaRay · · Score: 1

      I think your battery has run its life (been through too many recharge cycles) if it dies so quick.

      Either that or you need to learn how to maintain battery life through proper usage patterns:

      Take a look at http://www.mjfreelancer.com/nepal/r00320000424lef0 1.htm

  43. Slowdot by jaaron · · Score: 2

    Yeah, Slashdot is painfully slow here in PA. On a T1 too.

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  44. Toshiba did me right... by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Dell seems to be no better...

    however My experience with toshiba was great. I dropped my wifes laptop with the 802.11b card sticking out and that shoved the PCMCIA card slot deep into the casing- I had bought the extended warranty (the laptop is 2 years old) and in under 24 hours I had a new system board. It seems like they have great service to me!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Toshiba did me right... by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1

      I love my toshiba, a p4 1.7 and yeah the speed steep can be adjusted in the control panel, but I found a permenent fix, I now run linux on it, don't see a speed step option.... YEAH!

    2. Re:Toshiba did me right... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      Similar experience here. . .I sat in a broken chair (honest!) and when I finally realized I was on the floor with my laptop I worried that the Orinoco Silver sticking out from the left side caught something. It did: the motherboard was toast. Went to a certified Toshiba repair center, told them my story and the next day I picked up my system with a new motherboard. No cost. I even told them about the fall. And, no, I didn't buy the extended warranty.

      Then, 9 months later, something else (I forget) went wrong and I needed another motherboard replacement. Different shop this time, but same experience: no hassle. Best service I've ever experienced with computer products (well, besides IBM, to be honest. . .).

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  45. TOSHIBA 5005-s504 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I expect you will hear a lot from Toshiba 5005-s504 owners or ex-owners such as myself. After 9 months, a fried MB, three cooked DVD-CD players and a sizzled MB, TOSHIBA finally purchased my 'machine' back. The problem? A desktop CPU, and insufficient cooling. At first it just shutdown from over heating, along with the loss of any unsaved work. Next TOSHIBA modified the BIOS to change the CPU speed inversly with temperature. Of course the performance sucked at this point. This machine was advertised as the ultimate in multi-media available. I decided it was the ultimate in bad design and ask and got my money back, ...full refund. One other major problem, you can't get to the BIOS except via the OS. The Lagacy machine, I think they (T and M$) say.

  46. Slashdot and Speed Step? by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Funny

    With as slow as Slashdot is running today, did someone enable Speed Step on the Slashdot servers? Maybe Cowboy Neal unplugged the servers so they are running in battery mode!

    1. Re:Slashdot and Speed Step? by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it is the reverse /. effect since Drudge linked back to /. on the article about Doom III being linked.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    2. Re:Slashdot and Speed Step? by Spamhead · · Score: 1


      Damn! I forgot the Cowboy Neal Adds Karma Rule(tm) when I posted this same thingbefore...

      --
      Everybody Wang-Chung tonight!
  47. Desktop vs Mobile CPUs by unfortunateson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look at it this way, when you're on power, you've got a better chip than the equivalent mobile CPU, right?

    And the control panel for SpeedStep (under Windoze at least) lets you turn it off and burn through your batteries anyway.

    And how often are you away from power? Cars and planes, it's only $100 or so for a DC adapter. Camping? Unless you're backcountry, you've probably got an accessible outlet, even if it's next to the sink ;^). At the beach? Sand plays hob with your CD drive -- which won't last long on battery power either.

    Frankly, what are all those cycles for? I can only think of a few things:
    * Gaming -- but if you've got broadband to play, isn't there a power outlet around?
    * Digital photos and video -- snag some extra batteries -- if you're video editing, you've got a backpack full of gear anyway.
    * Warskating?
    * Serving Oggs from a park bench?
    * Digital capture at the Two Towers premiere?

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  48. Quite Obvious by UTPinky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forgive me if I come off sounding snide, but you really should have done your research. Intel has at least for the last 4 years been differentiating between their desktop processors and their mobile processors. You can always tell this because laptop processors are distinguished with the word "mobile". It's not that tricky, and is why I waited a few extra monthes for laptops to start using the mobile processors in their laptops instead of the full-blown model

    --
    I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
  49. you guys are missing the point by jest3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    The point is Dell is using desktop CPU's in their SmartStep model laptops - and as a result these laptops don't behave like you would expect from a laptop using a 'Speedstep' compliant chip.

    Desktop CPU's are not compatible with Speedstep technology (Speedstep reduces speed - but allows the user to bypass this if need be within software)

    The Dell SmartStep laptop actually reduces your speed by half in battery mode and this CANNOT be altered via software .. or buttons on the keyboard etc ..

    Dell makes no mention of this fact on their website, product brochures, or any other material you would read before purchasing the laptop.

    1. Re:you guys are missing the point by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Assuming this guy is right (and I beleive he is based on other postS) - this is certainly a shambles.

      Sure battery life is important etc etc etc but with the option of replacement batteries being purchased - some people might just need the full 2.2ghz on the road - this should at least be an option for users.

      A desktop cpu in a laptop seems immensly power in-effecient to me, based on the temperature that pc's run at now (cpu's rather) - I figure we can probably get a 2.2ghz chip, run it around 800mhz and still get a usable machine, but lasting 3x longer and cooler to boot.

    2. Re:you guys are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes .. SmartStep is a MODEL of laptop whereas Speedstep is technology used in chips to dynamically lower speed ..

      SmartStep != Speedstep

      the Dell Laptops have a desktop CPU (which do not support Speedstep) so the 'throttling' is not like you would expect and can only be bypassed by plugging it into a wall .. when you using batteries you cannot bypass it .. they dont tell you any of this.

    3. Re:you guys are missing the point by rlangis · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean by 'half', but on the Dell Inspiron 8100 that we have, the proc speed is dropped by ~200Mhz, which is nowhere near half. From 866 to 667 (I wanted the 1.2Gig, but the wife had final purchasing authority, wench).

      Not that I've kept up with the current trends...I'm still paying off this one. :\

      --
      GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  50. I can only blame myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Compaq laptop with a 1.2 gig Pentium III pre-installed with XP home as the OS (ugh). The power control panel was preset to the 'laptop' setting. I notice that when on battery power it is running at 800MHz. Didn't give it another thought, I figured it was trying to save the battery. Weeks later, I decide to check the speed on external power. Still 800 MHz. WTF?! Its that damn 'laptop' setting. I change it to 'desktop'. Now it runs at 1.2 gig when plugged in, and 800 MHz on battery. I chalk it up to Windows weirdness, and blame myself for not verifying it earlier. The odd thing is that I don't notice a big speed difference between the two.

  51. Laptop lemons by neoshmengi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I shelled out big bucks for my "desktop replacement" Toshiba satellite 5000 which has a desktop PIII 1000GHz chip. Unfortunately, the processor runs so hot that it constantly overheated and powered down. The BIOS "fix" clocks down the CPU when it gets hot (which is always) so it doesn't shut down spontaneously any more, but now I have a VERY expensive pentium two equivalent. When you apply the BIOS fix it changes the BIOS so that the install disks which contain the gimped version of your Win OS won't unstall on the "unrecognized laptop" until you take it in to an authorized dealer.

    Not to mention that this laptop doesn't even have a standard bios that you can configure. It's some wierd proprietary thing that lets you make a password and select boot priority and that's it.

    The sound is problematic too because it runs through ACPI, which is fine for windows, but very difficult if you want to run linux. So for the one in four linux distros that can actually boot up on this laptop, so far none of them have sound that works.

    Toshiba won't do a thing to help you when you get these headaches. I would stay away from buying a brand new laptop until you can do a little research to see what sort of problems will crop up.

    1. Re:Laptop lemons by shepd · · Score: 1

      >It's some wierd proprietary thing that lets you make a password and select boot priority and that's it.

      I'll beat $5 (/.) that it's a Phoenix BIOS.

      Ahh, the bane of the computer industry. Rates right up there with the C&T BIOS-on-a-disk.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Laptop lemons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I shelled out big bucks for my "desktop replacement" Toshiba satellite 5000 which has a desktop PIII 1000GHz chip.

      1000 GHz? Wow! Imagine a...never mind.

    3. Re:Laptop lemons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of these machines. You are right about the processors, but the sound _can_ be made to work.

      I'm running with a 2.4.18 kernel and the acpi patch. Certain verions of the acpi patch(in fact, all but one) would cause crashes. However, once you find an acceptable acpi patch, the sound is fine.

    4. Re:Laptop lemons by nmg · · Score: 0

      No wonder it's overheating.

  52. But should there be? by smcv · · Score: 2

    Until about a month or two ago, I thought laptops were pretty much the ideal desktop machine if you could afford them - OK, their expandability tends to suck, but they're nearly as fast as desktops, quiet, have un-flickery screens etc., and they're portable into the bargain. About a month or two ago, I joined the semi-official student tech support team at my college, and I've dealt with two overheating laptops since then. Is it just bad luck, or do modern laptops have trouble running their CPUs at full speed?

  53. you'd better boycott tomshardware by pierre.ch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    wasn't you unaware of that? don't read tech reviews, dude!

  54. OT - SLOWDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here on the west coast near Seattle washington it's very slow. DSL and T1. :(

  55. Caveat clubber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your arms will get tired

  56. Toshiba Satelite by n-baxley · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just recently bought a Toshiba Satelite 1200 and have been pretty happy with the performance. It has a power managment console that allows you tell it what mode to run in. In the full power mode you run your processor at full power. One of the default modes is power conserve mode where you processor runs at lower and lower speeds as the power drains. However you can run the full power mode when running on just batteries, you just don't get as much battery life. I still find I get close to the advertised 3 hours. My two biggest complaints about the Toshiba is that the bottom tends to get hot, and there is no docking station port. All in all, really happy.

  57. Many issues with "desktop chips" by BWJones · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I recall the first company to use the "smartstep" approach to portable computing was Apple with the 5300 series. However their solution then (even better with OS X) was only to run the CPU at what was required. If you were on the road and needed all the CPU horsepower, you got it, but inbetween clicks and hard drive activity, the CPU throttled down.

    As to the chips themselves, lower power RISC chips actually can be used in both desktops and laptops and you don't have to deal with this sort of engineering workaround of marketing. The other issue with using many desktop chips in laptops is heat. For instance, my mother purchased an Wintel laptop with a desktop chip that was designed with a huge fan on the bottom of the computer, so that if you actually placed it on your lap, you would block the fan and the laptop would overheat and shutdown. I bought her a Powerbook (the first Mac she ever owned) and she has never gone back to the Wintel crowd. It's thin, it's light and she always has all the power she needs battery or AC power.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Many issues with "desktop chips" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As I recall the first company to use the "smartstep" approach to portable computing was Apple with the 5300 series.


      It was far before that, as my Powerbook 100 (1st gen powerbook w/ 68000) has something like that. A control strip thingy could show you when the processor powered down to 1/2 speed when you weren't doing anything active.

    2. Re:Many issues with "desktop chips" by dylan.ucd · · Score: 2, Informative

      in fact these features have been available ever since apple started making laptops. in macos speak it is called "processor cylcing"- in effect throttling the processor in between tasks. it is a great way to save your batteries, without a large degredation in performance. you can manually slow the machine to 1/2 speed if you need even more battery time. one tip - turn off processor cycling if you are going to use a PCMCIA based USB card in a powerbook with no built-in USB. when it comes to energy consumption and heat production RISC is just plain better. the end

  58. I get tired of telling people this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You should have bought a Mac.

  59. My 2 piastres by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

    It is marketroid disinformation - but only just.
    A laptop is blatantly intended for mobile use, which implies extended battery-mode use. The processor speed should not be advertised assuming that the machine is plugged in to a wall.
    This is a little bit like advertising a car as 'the safest in the world' and subsequently discovering that they meant 'the safest in the world when standing still in an empty parking lot'.
    OK, extreme example, but you know what I mean.
    And to add to another earlier post:
    OT PS: Yes, /. is real slow today. Dunno why. Taco?

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  60. lower power by karouser · · Score: 1

    Well aparently you didnt notice this until you read THG so you should feel dirty. Seriously it's a good thing for the battery life. I have seen almost all laptops useing this to extend battery life. Even ZDNET's computer shopper posts there test with speed step enabled and unenabled so you can compare both ways.I think the real problem is that this guy just doesnt understand what he reads.

    This might be a troll post but it is my veiw and opion.

    --
    Cut! Slash! Hack!
    1. Re:lower power by karouser · · Score: 1

      oops I mean "view". Sorry typing with one hand as I'm cooking dinner.

      --
      Cut! Slash! Hack!
  61. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  62. Can you use it as a feature and a complaint? by kinshadow · · Score: 0

    First THG says "...in battery mode, the CPU runs at half-speed only." Then they say "What did leave a good impression were the two hours and 47 minutes of battery-running time and the complete set of equipment." Can you use the same point as both a good and bad point?

    --
    Sigpilot : I'm in the pipe, 5 by 5.
  63. RE: OTPS by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1


    3 things could be slowing slashdot today:

    1. Carmack seeking revenge for the Alpha leek news. Yep, BOY can he hack. Geek vendettas rule!

    2. Somebody got the alpha mirrored on slashdot.

    3. Taco is playing the alpha on slashdot servers.

    Meh. Any other ideas?

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  64. It's only a LITTLE bit slimy... by DeComposer · · Score: 1


    Well, the fine print isn't all that fine and Intel's SpeedStep/Clock-throttling technology has been thriving in the wild for some time now.

    Sure, it's a little cheesy that they're sticking a desktop processor into a laptop; power conservation and thermal dissipation both suffer. But they do give you the advertised clock speed when you're plugged in.

    The only thing I find particularly offensive is that the feature cannot be disabled from the BIOS. Maybe I'm just a reactionary, but I really resent someone else deciding what's 'best' for me.

    --


    Karma
  65. Actually... by msaulters · · Score: 4, Informative

    As I understand it, the SmartStep systems with desktop CPUs are targeted toward a business-traveller market that just wants a portable high-power system. They don't care about battery life, since they can plug it in when they're in a conference room, with projector attached. What they want is raw performance. As has already been noted, you'd do well to research your purchases in the future.

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    1. Re:Actually... by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because as everybody knows, business lUsers need more power than anybody. Powerpoint being such a processor hog and everything.

      Seriously, though, does anybody else have a boss who needs a bogger monitor / faster PC than anyone else on the floor, just to show that they are "the BOSS"?

  66. Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you bought an old Mustang and found out it was a four cylinder POS and not an eight cylinder monster would you feel cheated?

    I would feel cheated if the dealer told me it was an eight cylinder mark2, and expected me to do extra research to find out that the mark2 eight cylinder engine would disable half the cylinders whenever I took it out of the driveway.

    The problem has two possible solutions (and I'd recommend a combination of both):
    1. Consumers should better educate themselves before buying, or
    2. Companies should avoid using misleading advertisements.

    Most folks see a laptop ad that says "2.0 Ghz processor featuring SpeedStep technology," but only come away believing that "this new 2.0 Ghz computer is .8 Ghz faster than my current 1.2 Ghz computer."

    We've seen similar naming problems with 3d graphics cards. Geforce4 MX (slower than Geforce 3ti) vs. Geforce 4 4600 (faster than 3ti), or Radeon 9700 vs. Radeon 9700 Pro. Sometimes "Pro" or "Deluxe" means better. Other times "Pro" or "Deluxe" means crappier. (Ok so deluxe usually means crappier, but you get my point)

    I think the main problem stems from the fact that computer performance cannot be fairly conveyed in a few convenient, marketable numbers. AMD has been combating that status quo with their XP naming scheme; Athlon Tbird 1.4 Ghz vs. new Athlon XP 1600 (runs at 1.4 Ghz) vs. Pentium 1.6 Ghz.

    So, who is responsible for getting the information to the customer that speedstep technology would significantly slow down their portable computer whenever they go on battteries?

    1. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analogy is flawed. It would be as if you had purchased an 8 cylinder mustang expecting peak performance even when you're running the wrong kind of fuel. Having done a modicum of research, one would have quickly discovered that these laptops achieve top performance only when provided with an adequate power supply. Hell, common sense should've told you that much. The key word here is desktop processor. Having identified their processors as being desktop processors, it is purely a case of caveat emptor.

    2. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by Mr.+Red+Baron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I would feel cheated if the dealer told me it was an eight cylinder mark2"

      ...and rightfully so. The UCC states that any contract you enter into where the seller lies (either intentionally or mistakenly) about the product sold is voidable, thus allowing you to escape it.

      However for the original poster, this might not apply because all laptop chips downshift when running on battery- to save power consumption, duh. So this might qualify as a case where the lack of investigation (normally not expected of the consumer) might be so grossly negligent that it amounts to acting in bad faith on part of the consumer to ascend to the terms of the contract. That is of course, my opinion, a court might rule otherwise, but it would certainly be surprising of they did.

      Unless you can show that they represented the product to run always at a certain speed, I don't think you'll have much legal ground against the merchant.

    3. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by Bobartig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      However for the original poster, this might not apply because all laptop chips downshift when running on battery- to save power consumption, duh.

      First off, my laptop's cpu does not downshift. I tell it not to. Second, its a desktop chip masquerading as a laptop chip, which causes more problems. They don't technically downshift because they're missing SpeedStep circuitry. Instead, the timer sends the CPU empty cycles every other cycle, so the processor only does work half its cycles. This effectively lowers power consumption and performance, without techincally changing the speed of operation (because the desktop processor can't change speed)

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    4. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2

      Update:

      Found a very visible superscript note on Dell's 250N Tech Specs page. It is attached to the line "Intel® Pentium® 4 processor at 2.4 GHz" and reads "Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery."

      So if he bought it from the website, Dell did make a fair effort to let him know about the speed drop.

    5. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by andrewski · · Score: 1

      And we all know how likely that it is that companies will stop using misleading advertising, willingly. Or, that their employees (I mean our representatives) should compel them to tell the truth.

    6. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that the Mecedes Benzes already do it ? And no one is complaining

    7. Re:Caveat Emptor ... or Misleading Advertising ? by yngv · · Score: 1

      care to elaborate? Got a link?

  67. NOT LEGAL ADVICE by Compulawyer · · Score: 5, Informative
    This post is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you need legal advice, you should consult with a competent attorney who is licensed to practice in your state (or other jurisdiction outside the U.S.).

    That being said, every state in the US has a version of the Uniform Commercial Code. Section 2-313 deals with Express Warranties. Any affirmation of fact or promise or description of the goods creates an express warranty which is breached if the goods sold and delivered do not conform to the factual affirmation or description or if the promise made is broken. For example, if the processor speed is labeled as 1 GHz, the consumer is entitled to rely on the 1 GHz measure. A split 1 GHz/500 MHz ration when running on AC/battery does not conform to the affirmation of fact (processor speed) made by the merchant and could be said to breach the express warranty.

    Section 2-314 is the Implied Warranty of Merchantability. The warranty is created simply by virtue of making the sale. If the goods sold are not such that would pass without objection in the trade then the warranty has been breached. Here, the argument would be that the industry creates mobile versions of chips for laptops because of battery life concerns. If someone wants to depart from that practice and use a speed slowdown to reduce power consumption, then that fact must be disclosed and agreed-to by the consumer prior to the sale. Otherwise, the consumer is entitled to rely on the standard practice when making the purchase. Such undisclosed use of "slowed" desktop processors would not pass without objection in the trade and could be said to breach the implied warranty of merchatability.

    Additionally, virtually every state has a "Little FTC Act" or Consumer Protection statute. These statutes outlaw "unfair or deceptive" business practices. Breaches of warranty are usually automatic violations of these statutes. The penalty is usually up to three times your damages (for example, the cost of your laptop times 3) plus attorneys fees if you hire a lawyer.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    1. Re:NOT LEGAL ADVICE by puppet10 · · Score: 2

      This is not legal advice either.

      But another helpful thing is that for the amount involved it will usually fall under the small claims limit, which means for a generally nominal fee you can have your day in court, although you do need to do a bit of preperation to document how the other party didn't live up to thier end of the bargain, in this case possibly false advertising.

      Small claims is relatively painless to pursue if you have your act together, and generally the worst outcome is that you lose the nominal filing fee.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    2. Re:NOT LEGAL ADVICE by p7 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it is mentioned. On the tech specs reduced speed when running under battery is listed as footnote 2.

      As a consumer, we do need to do some research as to what we are buying. Should Dell more prominently display the information listed in the footnotes of the tech specs page, probably.

    3. Re:NOT LEGAL ADVICE by ckedge · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it is mentioned. On the tech specs reduced speed when running under battery is listed as footnote 2.

      But are "footnotes" good enough? They might not be. If you go buy a car, and the dealer tells you something that is factually incorrect, you can still get the deal quashed as "unfair or deceptive" despite the fact that what the dealer said is contradicted in some fine print somewhere in the manual.

      So, my read is that *if* the big-ass titles and what not are so big and prevelant, and can be construed to create a reasonable expectation that it is a real full-speed all-the-time part, it might over-ride any fine print.

      Any affirmation of fact or promise or description of the goods creates an express warranty which is breached if the goods sold and delivered do not conform to the factual affirmation or description or if the promise made is broken.

      You can't say in big huge text "2 GHz" and have a tiny obscure linked footnote that says "only when cooled using Liquid Nitrogen, runs at 750 MHz when at STP".

    4. Re:NOT LEGAL ADVICE by Compulawyer · · Score: 2

      Yes, consumers need to research more. However, the days of "caveat emptor" (let the buyer beware) are over. That is what warranty and unfair business practice laws are all about.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    5. Re:NOT LEGAL ADVICE by Compulawyer · · Score: 2

      Many regulations under state consumer protection acts actually provide that material information must actually be printed in a certain type size, font, etc.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  68. Every manufacturer has its bad apples by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    But overall, the number of happy users is far more than the number of disgruntled ones.

    I have an Inspiron 8200. My dad has an 8000. We have had stellar results with our laptops.

    I'm a regular on the Dell support forums (helping ppl out) - For every guy that comes in ranting about Dell's crappy support, 3-5 people reply to him with, "For one, this is the wrong place. Use the customer support forum if you have customer service complaints. FYI, when I had ,Dell happily shipped me a " - Yes, some people who had problematic DVD drivers were given not only a replacement, but an UPGRADE..

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  69. WRONG! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Maybe in the past, mobile CPUs were soldered-on BGAs, but in most recent laptops (Dell Inspiron 8x00, probably most other recent Dells), even the "Mobile" CPU is replacable. In the I8x00 series, you can even upgrade the video card (this made Slashdot a while ago).

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  70. Minor correction: by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Intel CPUs can scale up to 100% speed.

    Unfortunately, they can only scale down to a preset speed (In fact, they can only go to that speed or max, nothing in between). IMO that speed is still too high - 1.2 GHz on my P4-M 1.7.

    The Transmeta advantage is that it can adjust its clock speed far LOWER and in finer increments.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Minor correction: by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, they can only scale down to a preset speed (In fact, they can only go to that speed or max, nothing in between). IMO that speed is still too high - 1.2 GHz on my P4-M 1.7.

      Are you sure about that? My PIII laptop, rated at 1Ghz does 730 or 500 Mhz on SpeedStep depending on how heavily I'm using it. It's a Dell.

  71. not with the p-2000 by asv108 · · Score: 2

    Obviously, you don't own a Fujisu P-2000. With 2 batteries attached, I get 14 hours of battery life with a notebook that weighs under 4 pounds. Granted, its no speed demon, but it certainly fits anyone's definition of a mobile pc.

  72. Not dirty, stupid by ToasterTester · · Score: 2

    Dell laptops and many other laptops have been speed stepping to improve battery life for a long time. If you didn't know this you didn't do any research before buying a laptop. You should of realized this the first time you used the laptop. Where I work I got a new Dell about a year ago. It was real obvious the speed differece the first time I undocket the computer. I like the feature, I don't mind the speed difference for the battery life.

    Next you will start bitching about how hot the laptop runs, because it doesn't use a mobile CPU. That is the big issue with putting regular P4's in a laptop.

    Do your homework!

    1. Re:Not dirty, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking of stupid, it isn't proper to say "should of". it is "should have". stop watching TV and maybe you'll learn something.

  73. The solution is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When it goes to half-speed, just run two in a Beowulf cluster!

  74. You think that's bad? Toshiba laptops are worse... by ultrapenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Recently they started putting a interesting "disclaimer" on the laptops they sell (I checked specs pdfs for 1905 and 5202 series, but it seems like they all got one appended):

    Central Processing Unit ("CPUE Performance Disclaimer:
    CPU performance in your computer product may vary from specifications
    under the following conditions:
    use of certain external peripheral products
    use of battery power instead of AC power without changing factory
    pre-set power management settings
    use of certain multimedia games or videos with special effects
    use of standard telephone lines or low speed network connections
    use of complex modeling software, such as high end computer aided
    design applications
    use of computer in areas with low air pressure (high altitude >1,000
    meters or >3,280 feet above sea level)
    use of computer at temperatures outside the range of 5C to 35C
    (41F to 95 F) or >25C (77F) at high altitude (all temperature
    references are approximate).
    Under some conditions, your computer product may automatically shut-down.
    This is a normal protective feature designed to reduce the risk of lost
    data or damage to the product when used outside recommended
    conditions. To avoid risk of lost data, always make back-up copies of data
    by periodically storing it on an external storage medium. For optimum
    performance, use your computer product only under recommended
    conditions. Read additional restrictions under "Environmental ConditionsEin
    your product Resource Guide. Contact Toshiba Technical Service and
    Support for more information.

    Wow, you mean, my new laptop will not perform as advertised, and might actually just TURN OFF while I am NORMALLY using it? Why the heck would I want to spend $2.5k for a Satellite 5205 to find out it will clock down to half speed while "being used" and then if I "use it too much" will just simply shutdown?

    To the story author, be happy you didn't buy from toshiba or else you'll be retyping your report each time Toshiba engineers decide its time for your new laptop to turn off to protect itself from overheating.

  75. That doesn't sound right. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Usually the fans on Dell laptops are less aggressive when unplugged (Fans consume power...) This is the case with my Inspiron 8200.

    That said, Dell usually sets the temperature threshold pretty high - If you run an Inspiron, do a search for FanGUI.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:That doesn't sound right. by DEBEDb · · Score: 3, Funny
      Usually the fans on Dell laptops are less aggressive when unplugged...


      New MTV special: Fans unplugged.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    2. Re:That doesn't sound right. by sryx · · Score: 1

      I'll second that! I was at Stained Unplugged, and the fans were WAY less aggressive! I hear the Dell Laptop fans go NUTS, it must be that Steve guy.
      -Jason

  76. Turn it off! by Lissst · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I purchased my HP laptop around 2 years ago, all I had to do was click on the little "SpeedStep" icon in the system tray, and then select the option to NOT cut the CPU time in half when running on battery power. I remember this utility being an Intel program so if you don't have it on your computer, I would contact the manufacturer and tell them to send you a copy of the utility.

  77. This laptop doesn't have SpeedStep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Intel charges more for P4-Ms than P4-desktops for a reason. The P4-M has a whole slew of features to save power, not the least of which is SpeedStep.

    SpeedStep drops the CPU's voltage as well as the frequency when it goes into battery-optimized mode. The laptop in question just throttles the CPU. That's bad.

    You get what you pay for. Look for laptops with a "P4-M" chip. Do some homework, and you can get a reasonably power-efficient laptop.

  78. Obligatgory Mac riposte - Macs are mobile by alispguru · · Score: 2

    I haven't used a PC laptop since about 1994 - that was a 33 MHz Pentium with 16 MB of RAM and a monochrome screen which would run for a little over an hour on its battery, and that was with every screen-dimming, hard-disk unspinning, power-saving option I could find turned on.

    Every Mac laptop I've used since then would run for at least two hours on one battery. My current 500 MHz iBook runs for just under three hours on a charge, will sleep for over a week unplugged, has a wake-from-sleep time of two seconds, and can be safely run completely to battery exhaustion - with its last gasp it dumps the whole processor state to disk, so if you then plug it in and hit the boot button, you come up exactly where you left off.

    I knew things were bad in the PC universe regarding power consumption, sleep and wake, and state preservation, but is it really that bad? Has battery life really not improved for PC laptops since 1993?

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Obligatgory Mac riposte - Macs are mobile by gvonk · · Score: 2

      I knew things were bad in the PC universe regarding power consumption, sleep and wake, and state preservation, but is it really that bad? Has battery life really not improved for PC laptops since 1993?

      Yeah. My Gateway 450x has a great battery, about 2.5 or so hours watching a movie, maybe 3 just doing whatever.
      That "dumps the whole state to disk" feature is the same as Windows' "Hibernate" function. I LOVE hibernate. You can set your power settings to hibernate at 3% power or something so that you never ever lose anything. Hibernation is awesome because it writes all of the ram and settings to disk and completely shuts off the computer, requiring absolutely no power at all. Time back up from hibernation is a little higher, maybe 15-25 seconds, but it's worth it to have unlimited hibernation time. I never even shut off the computer any more because the hibernation is much faster than my 2.5 minute boot time. The only thing remaining for me to do is to create a partition specifically for the hibernate data so it isn't constantly swapped out and fragmenting all my data.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  79. SpeedStep on desktop P4s by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Mobile P4's for instance use a lower core voltage.

    In other words, they're underclocked P4s.

    the mobile cpu's have the speedstep circuitry built in, the desktop cpu's do not

    Half true. The desktop processors have a form of SpeedStep built in that underclocks a hot processor, running it only every other microsecond.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:SpeedStep on desktop P4s by afidel · · Score: 2

      Underclocking and reduced core voltage are NOT the same thing, underclocking can allow you to lower core voltage and remain stable but they are not the same thing. In fact reducing voltage for under/overclocking is usually no more then 10-15% whereas the difference between mobile and desktop cpu's can be 30-40%. And the thermal protection circuit on the P4 is really nothing like speedstep other than they can both reduce the clockspeed of the cpu.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:SpeedStep on desktop P4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. I can run 700mhz desktop athlons (1.6-1.7 vcore) at under 1.3v at 500MHz.

  80. Sure it's ethical! by writertype · · Score: 1
    On one hand you get a desktop CPU when maybe this feature wasn't explicitly called out. On the other hand, you get a nice lap warmer just in time for winter. And I bet you didn't think about that when you bought it, did you?

    Seems fair to me :)

  81. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I can't tell you how many times I've had my laptop just shut down with no warning..."

    Huh? What kind of ancient laptop do you have? Every laptop I've seen that has been manufactured since about 1998 comes with a nifty little battery indicator -- whether that indicator is on the laptop itself or is a function of software. Almost every single laptop also makes a beeping noise when the battery is about to go dead. Usually you can also tell because the screen dims when it's unplugged, etc. All of this is controlled via software.

    And the claim that your laptop only gets 30-40 minutes of battery life? That tells me that you have an old clunker right there. Batteries stop holding a full charge after a year or two; at 3-4 years they die altogether or only work for a few minutes.

    Please don't use your clunker as an example. I'm considering buying a Thinkpad X series, which weighs 3.7 pounds and has up to 5 hours of battery life (that is, tested battery life, not marketing estimates.) I honestly can't believe that you would assume that all laptops are crappy just because yours is. Pfft.

  82. Speak for yourself. by Kjella · · Score: 2

    My Toshiba Protege 2000 with both batteries lasts for about five hours. I used to sit outside the Uni with wireless during weekends (no coverage in the building we had access to during weekends, doh!). 5 hours with Wireless enabled (and usually hdd spinning because I'm downloading something), that's good enough for me.

    I'll get more than that when I'm only playing games, and you won't believe how many hours it'll play mp3s if I put on a playlist and let the screen black out (that's the real power drain in this one).

    Oh and speedstep is a great technology. Dynamic switching makes it transparent for most tasks, if not I can configure it as I want it. Nothing like P3-175MHz @ 0.6W or thereabout (750MHz @ 10W on full power) for when you're just idling.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Speak for yourself. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
      Nothing like P3-175MHz @ 0.6W or thereabout (750MHz @ 10W on full power) for when you're just idling.

      This is a good thing? Full speed while you are doing nothing......

  83. Demand Reciprocity by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    So am I the only one that laments my home desktop PC being this large noisy machine that consumes a lot of electric power?

    I'd like a desktop machine with a real keyboard, mouse and monitor, but

    1. micro form factor box, like a book
    2. quiet, no-fan
    3. low power consumption, so I can leave it up 24/7, have a UPS keep it up for hours, etc.

    The best way I see for this to happen is for a chip designed for laptops to be incorporated into the next generation desktops.

    Why not?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Demand Reciprocity by nmg · · Score: 0

      Or you could just buy a laptop. Most laptops have external mouse/keyboard/VGA ports.

    2. Re:Demand Reciprocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, go look on eBay. I know they still exist. Do a search for G4 Cube. Fanless, small, quiet, and Low power consumption. And to top off your new toy, pick up one of these.

    3. Re:Demand Reciprocity by singularity · · Score: 1

      It would be really nice to have a computer that small with those power requirements.

      Look into either Flex AT or Micro ITX motherboards.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  84. You have no idea how good you have it... by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    Back in my day, they really DID put vanilla desktop chips into laptops! A friend of mine had a 200mhz laptop that heated up so much that it melted the keys on the keyboard above the heat exhaust (which went right out of the PCMCIA slots, good thing he wasn't a serious card user...)

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  85. well, by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Macs already run at half speed.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  86. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nowhere on that page is the actual clock speed disclosed. It is not full disclosure.

    If I was in the market for this laptop, I would expect the manufacturer to tell me up front (not buried at the bottom of the specs page in -3 font size) the following two items:

    1. This laptop will run at 1.0 ghz when not plugged in
    2. Unlike SpeedStep processors, you CAN'T DISABLE this behavior.

    The fact that they don't even mention the lower clock rate is deceptive enough to warrant a full refund.

  87. wtf? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    and they don't throttle back the processor because of poor processor engineering.

    Yeah, they just run at half speed all the time.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  88. What nobody seems to be saying... by Pedrito · · Score: 2

    is, did you research your laptop before you bought it? I mean, I buy desktop clones all the time without thinking about it. I mean, a desktop is a desktop is a desktop, for the most part. When it comes to laptops though, I'm paying quite a bit extra and I'm pretty damn careful about what I get.

    Despite Timothy's discouraging words, I personally love my Toshiba Satellite. It's the best laptop I've ever used. Actually, until I got the Satellite, I had always hated laptops. These things rock.

  89. How much is apple paying you? by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Oh, haha. I forgot, apple dosn't need to pay anyone to promote their crap, since you're all brainwashed.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  90. Desktop CPU's don't make sense anymore... by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

    ... when both AMD and Intel's offerings generally take more than 50 watts. The last desktop chip that had any hope of working well as a mobile was the Tualatin P3/Celeron... which is being dropped.

    IMO, even the P4M is too power hungry - I'd absolutely hate to have a laptop with a desktop P4. Bring on Banias! (or even some more P3M models :) )

    As for slowing down a desktop CPU - after I got my Thinkpad 600E it turned out it had been set to power saving mode - 90mhz :) It wasn't running too slowly, but I definitely noticed when I reset it to full speed.

  91. AMD desktop in a laptop. $599 by hedley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our local Fry's is selling these things under the brand QuickNote. We bought two of them for customer visits to our co. and we may get a few more. It has an AMD desktop 1Ghz cpu in it with a massive heatpipe -> a copper radiator like structure. Amazing looking. It has NO battery. Don't let the A/C cord fall out! It has WindowsXP home prebundled. Uses DDR PC2100 memory (128Meg of which windows only see's 96, must be the AGP screen buffer eats the other 32Mb). Think about that price for a moment... XP alone is like $100 to an OEM (or is it?...)

    Also the unit has a warning on it that the feet must be in the down position, tilting the case off the flat so that airflow can move to the radiator.

    I had heard when the P4 came out, Taiwan Inc figured out how to duct the heat out of a desktop cpu based notebook so they could be the first to offer a P4 notebook.

    Hedley

    1. Re:AMD desktop in a laptop. $599 by cwikla · · Score: 2, Informative

      This sounds alot like Ashton Digital. I came across them when searching for a cheap laptop (you can find a bunch of them on Yahoo Auctions).

      The interesting thing is that they aren't really notebooks in the normal sense in that they are more like "portable desktops", almost akin to the Osbourne, where all your stuff is in one easy to move around case.

      I was tempted to get one because I tend to use my laptop in just this way, bringing it to work, or using it at home, and there is usually an outlet near by. Of course I decided against it, because my Comfy Chair(TM) isn't as convenient with a power cord pulling on me from my laptop, so I need batteries :).

  92. Except this isn't about speedstep. by mindstrm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Speedstep is a fairly easy thing to research; they make a point of saying that laptops have it.. it's quite clearly labeled as such....
    And a speedstep enabled machine will let you run it at full clock all the time if you want to, easily. For instance, my laptop has a nice button on the windows system tray that lets me flip it between different cpu settings.

    In this case, the laptop does NOT have speedstep, it's a desktop processor, and the laptop is basically hardwired to run it at half speed when the AC is disconnected, the user has absolutely no way to change this behavior.

    It's not a common behavior, and one I think most readers here would not even know about until they looked in detail at those specific models of laptop.

    No, Mhz is not an all-encompasing speed indicator. but it's still quite releveant, and the difference between 1Ghz and 500Mhz is rather large, especially when you are forking out several thousand dollars.

    1. Re:Except this isn't about speedstep. by dwaggie · · Score: 1

      er, I would want a 500Mhz Alpha over a 1Ghz Celeron any day. The difference is not as large as you think, it's important to keep in mind what it's bought and what for.

      Much like the Graphics Cards analogy the guy used in the thread before, it's important to keep in mind what technology is being used. GeForce4s are completely different technology 'base' than the GeForce3. The GeForce3 MX chipset was a lot slower than the GeForce2 GTS and the GeForce3 Ti200 was slower than the GeForce2 Ultra.

      And, yes, I am agreeing with you on your point, but I felt that I just didn't want to possibly get flamed by a rabid threader while poking at his analogy.

  93. Well you should've... by sheddd · · Score: 1

    I don't recall there being any mention of this before I handed them thousands of dollars

    RTFM

  94. Power by Dolohov · · Score: 5, Informative
    Look at it this way: modern processors running at full speed can draw around 100 Watts of power. There's no way your battery is going to be able to hold out for long with that kind of drain from just the processor. Furthermore, for most applications, you're just not going to need something that fast when you're in a position where you can't get to an outlet.

    So, instead of "feeling dirty" because the people who designed your laptop were intelligent about it, why not "feel dirty" because you don't know enough about computers to understand why this is an issue, or maybe "feel dirty" because you've been sucked into the trap of thinking that clock speed is the be-all and end-all of computer performance.

  95. It's always been this way... by Spoing · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The devil is always in the details. There's not much you can do about it...since there's always one extra detail you'll miss.

    Case in point; Back when MFM hard drives were the only show in town, I built my first computer from parts. After a few weeks researching each part, I boldly went in and asked for a 1:1 hard drive controller -- paying extra for it -- along with the other premium pieces needed to build the beast.

    1. Meaningless fact: The old MFM drives would not necessarily be fast enough to continuously read data. Instead, they would read a track, fill up, and then skip a track or more; the disk would have a 1:2, 1:3, ... interleaving of tracks. If the drive and controller were in tune, the data could be read one track after another with no gaps; 1:1 interleave.

    After putting it all together, I ran some tests and found that data was being read from the drive with a 1:2 interleave. When I accused the uber geek salesman back at the store of giving me the wrong parts, his only comment -- sealed with a grin -- was;

    1. "That is a 1:1 controller -- just as you asked for. You didn't, though, ask for a 1:1 hard drive."

    Since then, I've assumed that no matter how I plan something isn't going to be right.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  96. No, you have to be kidding. by Draxinusom · · Score: 2

    What the poster is complaining about isn't the "SpeedStep" per se; if he had expected to get 2 hours of battery life and instead got 3 I expect he'd be delighted. Instead, he was expecting to get 2 hours of battery life at full speed because the processor used 30W of power and instead got a proc that would only get 2 hours at half speed because it used 55W of power. How hard is that to understand? When people buy a portable computer they expect the portable version of the CPU to be inside, and if it isn't then it should be listed as the demerit it is, not as a "feature".

  97. Choices Choices.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50% processor speed when on baterry power

    or

    baterry life lasting 12 mins

    choices choices... :|

  98. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  99. I'd like to see the exact opposite... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Desktop motherboards that can accept chips designed for laptops. Intel's Banias chip is going to smoke all the benchmarks for P4s megahertz for megahertz, and it's actually based on the PIII core.And it's going to do it for less power consumption and it will give off less heat.

    There will probably be a point where mini-boxen and laptops will converge. I actually prefer the mini-box plus separate LCD screen solution because it allows for a lot more bang for the buck, plus portability. You can't use it on a plane or a train but that's fine with me...I'd rather keep the money in my pocket.

    It will be interesting to see what VIA does too with the Centaur lineage chips. They might have an interesting (and cheap) laptop chip up their sleeve...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  100. ok. let me get this straight... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    As a frequenter of the Dell Customer Forums with over 8000 posts, I see your point, but the fact remains you bought Dell's cheapest laptop designed around the extreme penny pincher that needs a mobile computer and you trash it. You spent "good money" but you could have spent better money and applied it toward a real laptop with real laptop parts in it. If anyone here is at fault it is either you or Intel but not Dell.

    1. Re:ok. let me get this straight... by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      Why exactly can't you make me a "real" laptop inexpensively. Give me a cheaper, but laptop-friendly CPU.... VIA C3 or low-speed mobile chip.

      It drives me nuts that I can't even choose to make that compromise, because it's a choice I'd gladly make. In the bottom tier of laptops, I can either buy an overpowered machine that slows down on battery (Dell, Toshiba, etc.), an overpowered machine without a battery (ECS Desknote), or a used machine from Uncle Slimeball's Computers and 100 Big Shrimp with a battery that appears to have been trampled by a wild hamster stampede.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  101. SpeedStep'd CPU's aren't for the desktop by nft · · Score: 1

    CPU's with speed step aren't for desktops, they're for laptops. What are the ethics of posting a story with a backwards headline on slashdot? Surely I'm not the only pne who noticed this?

    --
    "We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -Gandhi
  102. Dell was stupid.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    While I think that they wanted to do something to have the fastest laptop, they did not have to do this. I still think it was a bad idea and it should have been made clear it was not a Mobile chip. This was common when 2 GHz laptops hit. I saw alot of them stuffing desktop CPU's in laptops. Still, I think that when your most likely to be using a battery, you might only be playing in single player mode on Quake III and everyone knows that if it's smooth it should be fine in single player mode. You only need more then 40 fps when in deathmatches (in my opinion). Those who go for fps want the best...STAY AWAY from laptops....period.

    --

    Gorkman

  103. No, we aren't. by SEE · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dell makes no mention of this fact on their website, product brochures, or any other material you would read before purchasing the laptop

    Actually, Dell does. On the product web page.

    Look at the actual web page detailing the computer.

    First, see footnote #2. "Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery."

    Then go up the page to where it has "Learn More" next to Processors, and click on it. That explains the difference between a Penitum 4 and a Pentium 4-M. Look at the "Details" tab and note the footnote on the Pentium 4 speeds that says "Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery."

    Now, finally, note that there's no M after the processor name in the specs.

    What does this mean? Dell both said that speed is reduced when running on battery AND that it isn't the mobile processor. All on the product web page.

    1. Re:No, we aren't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they have updated their site since traffic started hitting it .. That notebook wasn't on sale this morning ...

  104. OMG-- and P4 Mobiles of 2 Ghz runs at 1.20 Ghz! by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    A Mobile P4 1.4Ghz to 2.0 Ghz will run at 1.20Ghz unplugged

    Somehow I doubt we will see great progress in the future with 2.0Ghz unplugged until maybe 2004. :)

    If your laptop is used on a plane or outdoors half the time, consider buying a 1.4Ghz instead of 2.0Ghz :)

    And for PIII, 850, 900, and 1.0Ghz run at 750mhz unplugged. Same exact performance! :)

  105. It is even worse! by pvera · · Score: 3, Interesting

    75% of the Windows laptops I have been assigned over the last 5 years have had that "feature."

    Yes, feature. In each case the builder added little stickers and tray icons saying how it had a "power saving feature" that slows down the CPU to save battery power. The tray icon points to an applet that controls what triggers the speed drop.

    The biggest offenders in my case where IBM and Toshiba. Neither could play a full DVD. I remember one specific instance that the battery died right at the intermission for 2001: A Space Odyssey!

    My 600 MHz iBook on OS X 10.2 has this kind of feature in the system preferences, but as far as I can tell it defaults to full power. You would have to specifically set it to cut performance to save power. And I can watch a whole DVD without sweating it out.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  106. Why Dell and Intel Both Suck by Krueger+Industrial+S · · Score: 1

    When I first started reading this article I thought it was just another example of how Dell sells crap to it's customers. Ho-Hum, Dell is is a rip-off -- tell me something I don't already know.

    But then I looked at the benchmarks they ran and one of them got my attention - using WinAce to compress a 178 meg wav file. I was curious, so I decided to try this same test on my computer. I didn't have a 178 meg wav file but I did have a folder containing 25 wav files that added up to over 180 meg.

    The results: Their Dell notebook with 2.2 ghz P4 -- 268 seconds.

    My homemade computer with 1.47 ghz AMD Athlon (Athlon XP 1700+) -- 168 seconds.

    I can't believe that Dell or Intel gets away with selling this crap.

  107. My iBook... by jpellino · · Score: 2

    ...runs at lower speed when I take it off the wall.

    Unless I tell it not to by using the pretty well marked and detailed control panel.

    Not the BIOS, the equivalent of the notice they told Arthur Dent he should have seen about knocking down his house.

    Permissive and forgiving - really good parts of a good UI.

    And some very good cars have been taught to cut the feed to some cylinders when they don't need the torque.

    But again, research should have told you that.

    Just like someone *should* have told users that to 'stop' you press 'start', that the delete key works in the future only, and - well, if we're going to start detailing common UI foibles that pretty much are wince-inducing 'features' - it's going to be a looonnnng night.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  108. Re:no surprise there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel sorry for those that buy those gold plated TOSlink cables :D

  109. Re:You think that's bad? Toshiba laptops are worse by lrslrslrs · · Score: 1

    all CPU's have this disclaimer and yes i would prefer saving my CPU than my documents (you loose the doc you type it again you loose the CPU your out a couple hundred and coputer downtime) but you do have a poit why the heck can my comp operate complex rendering progs etc.

    --


    I hate people that dont have a sig

  110. What kind of a stupid question is that? by benedict · · Score: 1

    Of course it's unethical. Next!

    --
    Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  111. its called SPEEDSTEP by dmnic · · Score: 2, Informative

    and its in about 75% of ALL laptops out on the market. all of the GOOD units should have a control for this in the power management settings for Winxxxx.
    if you want to deal with the hassle of looking up part #s you can buy a non-speedstep mobo for an additional $500-1000 :)

  112. Read The Dell Website, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Let's say you decide to purchase the Dell SmartStep 250N. Here's a link: http://www.dell.com/us/en/dhs/products/model_inspn _1_inspn_200n.htm

    Suppose you are interested in the specifications of the P4 processor for this system. There's a handy link labeled "Learn More About Processor Performance". Click on the Details tab. The 200N/250N are listed clearly, as is scripted #1. Time to check the fine print. "Power management features limit processor speed when running on battery". None of the other laptops listed have this notice.

    Also, be sure to review the Tech Specs for this system. You will find the exact same information given for the CPU specs. Admittedly, there are no neon lights pointing to this information, but it is plainly available.

  113. What happens when CPUs become asynchronous? by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    Can you imagine the gripes when CPUs become asynchronous? People may actually have to look at the performance of the thing before buying.

    Seller: "This model is the fastest."

    Buyer: "No way, there isn't a clock speed listed on this thing...it must suck!"

    -ted

  114. MY laptop... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    My laptop. Mine. I paid for it.

    If I want to do something with that laptop that will use up my batteries in 10 minutes I should be able to.

    Who the hell are Dell or Intel to tell me that I can't?

    This is almost as bad as the record companies telling me I can't use my computer to make a backup of music I've purchased.

    I'm getting a little tired of big companes telling me what I can & can't do.

    George is getting ANGRY!

    --
    Huh?
  115. desktop cpus do downshift! by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

    First off, my laptop's cpu does not downshift. I tell it not to. Second, its a desktop chip masquerading as a laptop chip, which causes more problems. They don't technically downshift because they're missing SpeedStep circuitry. Instead, the timer sends the CPU empty cycles every other cycle, so the processor only does work half its cycles. This effectively lowers power consumption and performance, without techincally changing the speed of operation (because the desktop processor can't change speed) This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."


    actually desktop cpus do downshift, i believe its called 'clock throttling' to prevent severe processor damage in the event of critical cooling failure, so it doesnt reallys save power (or at least its never been pointed out as a key feature), but it does change the cpu speed!

  116. ??? running cpu intensive apps on the road by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

    id also like to state that if your going to running something thats eating cpu cycles and you have a 2000.00 laptop surely you can afford a 200.00 (or cheaper even) power inverter so you dont have to lose cycles, point being, running photoshop on laptop battery life isnt something that its designed to do, so in one way this 'feature' is a bad thing but in another way its kind of an idiot proof way to save battery life (which should be used for stuff such as.. processing word documents, and.. processing word documents) *chuckles*

  117. Re:You think that's bad? Toshiba laptops are worse by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

    Sir, when I purchase a 2ghz computer from the store (not a homebuilt piece of trash with heatsink falling off), I expect the machine to perform at 2Ghz 100% of the time regardless of what I am doing. Putting a disclaimer on it saying that "it might perform poorly" when you are doing CPU-intensive tasks is like saying "here is this new car, its rated to go 200mph but if you actually try that, it will top out at 100mph".

    And if there is a car rated for 100mph sitting right next to the 200mph one selling for $10000 less, which one would you buy?

  118. Lucky you by kasperd · · Score: 1

    HALF SPEED in battery mode.

    My old 33MHz laptop goes down to quarter speed when running on battery.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  119. The Ethics of Being a Cheap Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time for the kids to learn the saying "You get what you pay for" Welcome to life...it's gonna suck.

  120. mmm, feel the power! by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    my grandfathers 1981 cadillac had this feature, or it was available as a feature... i think they called it something like 8-6-4 or something appropriately gm-like. of course, i got his mint 1970 coupe deville with the 501 cubic inch monster. 1 guy, five girls, a full size cooler, and an empty trunk... too bad i wasn't getting anywhere!

  121. full power with battery by geserino · · Score: 1

    toshiba has a battery app that u can use to switch the processor to full speed. if u have a toshiba with the original factory sofware installed u will notice a light bulb icon on your system tray from there u can make your processor burn your battery faster if u wish. but i m sure u asked that at the toshiba forum right?

  122. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  123. ETHICS ? by NetEngineer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    O.M.G. Ethics mentioned in the context of Computer manufacturers, that is TOO funny!! I almost choked on my soda!!!

    --
    It is better to know that you have lost, than to not know that you have won!
  124. how arrogant you all are! by blisspix · · Score: 1

    rudely suggesting that this guy didn't do his research? And I bet none of you have ever made a bad purchase?

    Buying a computer is complex. Maybe not for many of the people who frequent Slashdot, but it is for most people. And a lot of people have limited access to specs, and even more limited understanding of those specs, let alone if sales reps lie or deliberately omit vital information.

    Give the guy a break!

    I've bought a few PCs (well, parts etc and boxes) and the first time I bought a Mac in April this year, I was completely bewildered. I trawled through hundreds of websites, groups, knowledgebase articles, etc. And I still managed to miss a couple of things. It happens to all of us.

  125. Mobile technology in 1997 by ruiner13 · · Score: 2

    Heh, found this article, written in '97, about the state of mobile processors. Wow, much has changed in only 5 years. Just reflect. 8 watts, and they were panicking. Wow.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  126. Obligatory Ellen Feiss Reference by davidstrauss · · Score: 2

    Shouldn't it be "...and like, halfa my speed was gone. It devoured my speed. It was some really good speed. And I like, had to plug it in quickly to get it back and it wasn't as good. ..."

  127. Most laptops are the worst of both worlds... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    OK, so its got a desktop processor. But why doesn't any company make a portable computer without any battery packs, replacing them with a built in, efficient DC transformer? Not having that annoying, heavy wall-wart would be a major plus and make the system easier to carry around. And they could always sell an external battery, say a large one that would take up half the carrying case and acually provide a decent amount of battery life.


    Then again, if someone wants something truly mobile, why is it impossible to buy a machine with a low speed, super-efficient CPU and (gasp) a monochrome screen that can last for days without a recharge? Even handhelds are going away from this - the battery life of many PowerPCs, with their colour screens and whatnot, is laughable. But my Handera 330 hasn't had its NIMH batteries recharged in a month...

  128. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clarity

  129. Re:Caveat Emptor...in regards to "throttling" cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this weekend i was in a friend's brand spanking new honda civic hybrid. it does the coolest thing - it shuts off the engine when you come to a stop. it's totally rad...you can't can't hear the engine at all and the car doesn't vibrate like a normal does when you get to a stop and idle.

    and though this is off-topic, it is interesting. and for a final point, the civic looks like a totally normal car (as opposed to the toyota prius which is nasty ugly). yes, this is a plug for environmentally friendly cars...

  130. You didn't read the article! by RinkSpringer · · Score: 2
    I quote, from THG

    In battery mode, it showed that the CPU is only half as fast as it is when running on the mains.

    See, it *IS* in the article!

  131. SmartStep Called SmartPC in the UK by Duds · · Score: 1

    I don't know why, but it's definetly a lot less confusing a name.

  132. Why must you do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So right off the top, if you're German, then Dell isn't even going to tell you that they're selling you a desktop processor that's automatically crippled when running on battery"

    Nobody even mentioned Hitler, and that's the first thing you mentioned.

  133. I think we've missed the point .... by lushman · · Score: 1

    Most people I know with notebooks use them because they live in an apartment and it's easier to store them. They never use them on the road, and certainly never away from a power point.
    I personally hate the things, but that said, as long as it is made clear that it has in fact a desktop cpu then there really shouldn't be an issue.

  134. Research. by Tinfoil · · Score: 2

    Alot of people are complaining about it and how the uneducated computer user is getting confused. I am repeating what has been said here many times, but it needs repeating. If you are spending 2-4k for something you better know what that something is. If you don't feel like doing your own research, ask a friend or co-worker. If you go into the purchase unarmed, you get what you deserve.

  135. "Ethics" ? by qoncept · · Score: 0

    When I bought my Dell Inspirion with a mobile Pentium 3 1ghz, there was no mention that it'd run at 733mhz in battery mode -- thats just what mobile Pentium 3's do. I looked around and none of the competitors did, either. Why is it that desktop cpus running at a lower clockrate is all of a sudden dishonest?

    --
    Whale
  136. Look for the PowerNow Logo. by klosskorban · · Score: 1

    The best thing to do when you don't understand the technology is ask a geek friend to help you shop. Since they keep all the details of how Speedstep works hidden on the Internet it might be hard for most non insiders to figure out that PowerNow is a must have for modern laptops and SpeedStep is a stupid hack. A friend of mine who cracks into CIA and FBI type stuff found a top secret information search tool called http://google.com . you better write the URL down, I don't know how long the government will allow this post to stay up.

    --
    Need help finding the flow? http://www.myspace.com/naturalismandbalance
  137. Codswallop by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    So the P4 runs at 2.2ghz when plugged into a powerpoint & 1.1ghz when running of it's battery, that would be about the same speed as a PIII 800mhz.

    That's plenty fast, I'd say on 97% of software out there the average user notices buggerall differance between a P111 500mhz & a topline T'bird or P4.

    Lets see doing a email there wouldn't be any differance, browsing the web, no differance, downloading MP3s or warez, no difference again, writing a letter no differance, wanking off on ICQ no diifferance agian, etc, etc

    Sure using Quake you might get 90fps instead of 150fps, but it's not as if you'd really notice.

    Ok on rendering 3D & compiling code things could noticably slow down in battery mood, but it sounds like you need to slow down too, so what's wrong with that?

    1. Re:Codswallop by NulDevice · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't really want to be either gaming or running 3d apps on a laptop anyway. To do anything really serious you need non-battery-powerable hardware anyway - good monitor for graphics, external audio interface for studio sound (not counting PCMCIA interfaces, but the latency of those bugs me), satellite dish for remote-controlling Mars probes...

      I've got a SmartStep 250 myself, and I knew about speedstepping, and I really didn't care. I've owned 4 laptops now and I think I've had them all on battery for a total of 10 hours. If it's running at 1.1gHz and all I'm doing is email, it's plenty fast enough. If VS.NET takes an extra minute to compile (hey, stop laughing, it pays the bills) that's just that much more time to drink coffee and read Slashdot.

      --

      ----
      "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

  138. Ye Olde Post Summary by Mancomb+Seepgood · · Score: 1

    85% - subject of "Caveat Emptor", followed by bad analogies about the situation 14% - Explanations/arguments about Speedstep, and why it does/doesn't apply to this situation 1% - Other random posts about CPUs, Dell, grits, etc

  139. Pushing the Processor by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately, I'm with the original author on this. When I pay massive money for a laptop, I expect massive performance. It would be one thing if it was configurable, and I could choose to run long or run hard, but in this case, I don't have a choice, and nobody mentions it when you lay down the dollars.

    For my experience, there are quite a number of things you'd need power for:

    1.) Working on a massive spreadsheet while you eat lunch. You don't need to work for four hours, you need to get it done in one.
    2.) Building a presentation or graphic ad en route to a site. Again, my flights run about two hours of work time (can't use the laptop on takeoff/landing) so longer battery life is useless when held against getting the job done in the time allotted.
    3.) Compiling code. When I run a build I'm killing time until it's done. It's cheaper to get it done faster and have a spare battery on hand than stand around (with five other overpaid workers) at a work site (where the nearest plug is 100 feet away) while some calculation happens.

    So, there are a number of applications where speed trumps longevity, and if the computer is going to force me to choose long run over power run, at least they should tell me before a pay good money for a laptop that's going to do it.

    Virg

  140. Re:You think that's bad? Toshiba laptops are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Wow, you mean, my new laptop will not perform as advertised, and might actually just TURN OFF while I am NORMALLY using it?

    Already moderated here, so have to post this AC, but:

    Would you rather have it TURN OFF or MELT DOWN?

  141. Drudge-Slashdot-Drudge-Slashdot by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    • I think it is the reverse /. effect since Drudge linked back to /. on the article about Doom III being linked.
    That explains my productivity loss today. . . in the process of switching back and forth between Drudge and Slashdot I got stuck in the Drudge-to-Slashdot link and couldn't break out of the loop. Damn.
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  142. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    But you who live on dreams, you are better pleased with the sophistical
    reasoning and frauds of talkers about great and uncertain matters than
    those who speak of certain and natural matters, not of such lofty nature.
    -- Leonardo Da Vinci, "The Codex on the Flight of Birds"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...