Slashdot Mirror


Fan-Made Star Trek Episode Available for Download

Minnesota trekker writes "Two Minnesota fans of the original "Star Trek" series spent seven years, off and on, creating an all-new episode in the 1960s style using their own actors, sets and props. Behold, the U.S.S. Exeter (www.starshipexeter.com). The episode's look and feel is amazingly authentic. The story is inventive and the acting surprisingly good. The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable. The site gives lots of details on how the episode was created, and even more background is available on the Pioneer Press site."

627 comments

  1. Already? by jeffasselin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No comments adn it's slashdotted already?

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    1. Re:Already? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      It was in the newspaper before it showed up on /..

      Yes,that's right. There are other news sources, /. is not responsible for every crashed server out there.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  2. Damnit Jim... by Life2Short · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm an ACTOR, not a STAGEHAND...

  3. Copyright infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    can't wait for the lawsuits to start :P

    1. Re:Copyright infringement by filth+grinder · · Score: 1

      They'll probably start as soon as Lucas gets around to suing all the Star Wars fan movies that are out there.

    2. Re:Copyright infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to be interesting to see what Paramount does. They probably do have grounds to sue for infringement (although I don't think that the site actully calls the movie 'star trek', which might help), but fans will hate them if they do.

    3. Re:Copyright infringement by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      Actually, there may be come copyright issues

      On the music, which sounds pretty close to the original. I'll have to check it out again when the server is back up.

      On the set and ship design

      On the uniform design

      On certain creative elements of the Universe - while you can't copyright people from earth. But Klingons, etc. are another matter.

      Of course, if you changed all that, it would not be very recognizable as Star Trek. which I think would be the point of copyright.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  4. Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by Snaller · · Score: 2

    I'll be in my bunk!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Fondling Vera, no doubt. :P

    2. Re:Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you keep vera. i want jayne. :-D

    3. Re:Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a moron who doesn't know how to use CSS if you think it causes readability problems.

    4. Re:Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by Snaller · · Score: 2

      You must be a moron who doesn't know how to use CSS if you think it causes readability problems.


      Actually you are the moron if you don't know that it causes readability problems.

      Visit www.cnn.com in Internet Explorer, try changing font size - what happens? The font size stay micro small, because of the stylesheets.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  5. Did they go... by craenor · · Score: 5, Funny

    To the William Shatner school of overacting?

    Cannot...seem...to...communicate...with...the aliens...must get...somekindof...resolution before Enterprise...is...destroyed!

    1. Re:Did they go... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      No respect for Starfleet captains.

      Just as the captain is heading to the bridge, someone jumps into the turbolift and shuts the door. (in the teaser) :P

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Did they go... by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Little known fact: Shatner started doing his trademark dramatic pauses in the early 60's as a Shakesperian actor, when he would forget his lines. The critics(?) loved it, so he incorporated it into his acting style.

      P.S. The ol' feller is 71.

      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
    3. Re:Did they go... by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      Like Joey Tribbiani's famous 'smell the fart' acting?

      Oh no...

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    4. Re:Did they go... by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      The forgotten lines tidbit sounds too good to be true, but the stage acting origin doesn't surprise me. Often what's considered good acting on stage turns into overacting in the more intimate medium of television. This especially true of traditional Shakespearean acting styles. That's why Kenneth Branugh is a genius; he knows how to play Shakespeare for the screen instead of the stage.

  6. What a great movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody better get a mirror out there quick!

    Hey, when you are done slashdotting, check out our stupid little website!

  7. Authentic? Good acting?? by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 0

    Wait a minute, how authentic (in relation to the original) could it be if the acting is good?

    --


    Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
  8. sounds like trouble by tps12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is pretty cool. I remember a similar community effort being discussed several years ago to bring the Timothy Zahn Star Wars sequels to the screen (or to tape, whatever). Never got off the ground, AFAIK.

    I am a little worried as to how this will be treated by Paramount. They are notoriously evil when it comes to "protecting" their copyrights, especially when it comes to Trek.

    Also, why the Exeter? Is there any reason given as to why the Federation would name a ship after an East Coast prep school with a history of buggery?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:sounds like trouble by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most likely, it was named after this Exeter. Here's an account of how the Japanese sunk her in WWII.

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:sounds like trouble by edwardd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Exeter is also the name of a Brittish warship.

    3. Re:sounds like trouble by ChaosMt · · Score: 2

      I don't know if this was the inspiration, but Exeter is the lead uhh... villan who has a change of heart the end of the bad 50's sci-fi movie This Island Earth - which I only know because Mystery Science Theater 3000 focused their wit on this movie, when they made their Mystery Science Theater 3000, The Movie.

      Alas, after a run on the comedy channel and then on the sci-fi channel, production of new shows has been cancelled. They still show reruns Saturday mornings, in fact make sure and check out "Space Mutiny" playing on Jan. 11th. It the funniest one of this last season.

      Mst3k - Thank you for all the laughs and bad movies. May you rest in peace.

    4. Re:sounds like trouble by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      All the Constitution-class starships are from Earth (i.e., real) history.

      Others include the Farragut and Constellation, as well as others I mentioned above.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:sounds like trouble by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "Also, why the Exeter? Is there any reason given as to why the Federation would name a ship after an East Coast prep school with a history of buggery?"

      On a hunch, I entered "HMS Exeter" into Google. It was a York-class heavy cruiser that saw action against the Graf Spee early in the war and was sunk in the Battle of Java Sea in 1942. It looks like it was one of the "not-a-battleship" classes that the RN was notorious for building in the 1920's and 1930's.

      IMO, a CC is closer to "NCC" than a CV-ish name like "Enterprise." What the heck does the N stand for, anyway?

    6. Re:sounds like trouble by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      NCC == "Naval Construction Contract"

      Concept Junkie (who could probably buy a car with his early 70's ST paraphenalia)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:sounds like trouble by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm replying to my own post because nobody around here seems to know nautical acronyms/abbreviations.

      Let's start with the easy ones:

      HMS - His (at the time) Majesty's Ship
      RN - Royal (British) Navy

      Now on to the CC that everyone seems to have missed:

      CC - cruiser (like the HMS Exeter)

      Other examples include:

      DD - destroyer
      FF - frigate
      CV - carrier
      BB - battleship
      SS - submarine
      SSB - ballistic missile submarine
      SSN - nuclear sumarine
      SSBN - ballistic missile nuclear submarine
      CVN - nuclear carrier
      BBN - Wouldn't that be nice...

      Now since CC stands for cruiser and the Enterprise has been described as a cruiser, I assumed that the CC part of NCC stood for "cruiser" (silly me).

      CCN I would have understood. "Nuclear cruiser." NCC looks backwards.

      Now, so far, I've gotten an aeronatuical-ish explaination that just sounds stupid when you consider how the rest of the universe uses nautical terms (the rest of the show ain't exactly Air Force friendly).

      I've also gotten an equally silly explaination of "naval construction contract." NCC-1701 USS Enterprise to me looks like it should mean "some-sort-of-cruiser-variant, hull number 1701, a. k. a. 'USS Enterprise'" just as CVN-65 USS Enterprise means "nuclear aircraft carrier hull number 65, a. k. a. 'USS Enterprise.'"

      If Paramount and fanboys are going to hand-wave, at least try to make it sound more believable than that!

      Oh, wait, this is Star Trek... my bad.

    8. Re:sounds like trouble by Britano · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually all three letters in CVN stand for something...

      C = Carrier
      V = Fixed Wing Aircraft
      N = Nuclear

      So in real english it's a fixed wing-nuclear powered carrier.

      --
      Avoid The Rush, Hate OU Early!!!
    9. Re:sounds like trouble by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      I had always hoped that the Zahn books would become movies after Lucas had retired or died. I'm sure that Lucas will never touch them while he's at the helm because then the plots wouldn't be a suprise to everyone. He should look at another trilogy of books, LOTR, to notice that a suprise plot is not needed for great movies.

      Any grassroots attempt at a SW film will certainly be met with a legal team that will make stormtroopers seem like nice, reasonable guys.

      -B

    10. Re:sounds like trouble by tps12 · · Score: 1

      He should look at another trilogy of books, LOTR, to notice that a suprise plot is not needed for great movies.

      Too late. He's already noticed that great movies are not needed for making tons of money.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    11. Re:sounds like trouble by mpe · · Score: 2

      On a hunch, I entered "HMS Exeter" into Google. It was a York-class heavy cruiser that saw action against the Graf Spee early in the war and was sunk in the Battle of Java Sea in 1942. It looks like it was one of the "not-a-battleship" classes that the RN was notorious for building in the 1920's and 1930's.

      Odd that your search didn't bring up the current type 42 destroyer. Especially considering that its sister ship, HMS Nottingham has been in the news recently.

    12. Re:sounds like trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does "SS" stand for submarine when it was the "SS Minnow" that crashed on the island, leading to hilarious hijinks, entertaining the world over?

    13. Re:sounds like trouble by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      I thought CC was cruiser, command, CA being cruiser, armoured and CL cruiser, light. But that's the SFB geek in me talking.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    14. Re:sounds like trouble by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      "Space Mutiny" was in the 8th season actually.

      However, I'll one-up you. I actually rented the movie! The local video store has more MST'ed SF movies than SF movies I'd want to rent... bleh!

      Anyhow, it was interesting to see what they cut out... most exposition that made the film have slightly more sense, plus some apparent fleeting nudity in the for-lack-of-a-better-word sex scene with Chunkhead and Grandma.

      Truly a horrible movie, and a great MST3K episode.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    15. Re:sounds like trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How does "SS" stand for submarine when it was the "SS Minnow" that crashed on the island...

      SS == Steamship
      USS == United States Ship
      RMS == Royal Mail Ship (like RMS Titanic)
      MV == Motor Vessel

      Gilligan's vessel would have been MV Minnow.

    16. Re:sounds like trouble by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I am a little worried as to how this will be treated by Paramount. They are notoriously evil when it comes to "protecting" their copyrights

      I suppose one could make a Trek-like show without it infringing on any copyrights. However, that is probably not the goal of these guys, for they are doing it for the heck of it.

      Galaxy Quest did a fairly good job of looking trekish without copying anything directly.

      But then again big studios can harass you with lawyers and courts just to scare you away.

      "Shields up! Incoming laywers!"

      BTW, does this new one have lots of mini mini skirts?

    17. Re:sounds like trouble by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I am a little worried as to how this will be treated by Paramount. They are notoriously evil when it comes to "protecting" their copyrights

      The Wrath of Paramount

      "Moouuunnnt!"

    18. Re:sounds like trouble by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

      Farragut? You're kidding... Unless that's another historical reference, i do believe somebody has been reading some David Weber... or vise versa :p

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    19. Re:sounds like trouble by eyegor · · Score: 2

      An example:

      The USS San Francisco has a hull number of SSN-711

      The USS stands for United States Ship, the SSN means Nuclear-powered Attack Submarine, the 711 is the hull number.

      There's also SSG and SSGN (for conventionally powered and nuclear-powered guided missle submarines)

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    20. Re:sounds like trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It submerged, didn't it?

    21. Re:sounds like trouble by aallan · · Score: 2

      Also, why the Exeter? Is there any reason given as to why the Federation would name a ship after an East Coast prep school with a history of buggery?

      Possibly they named the vessel after the other, more historic, Exeter? Al.

      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    22. Re:sounds like trouble by ThaReetLad · · Score: 2

      you missed DDG and CCGN for guided missile destroyers, and nuclear guided missile cruisers.

      I dont know any BBN's but there are CBGN's (Nuclear Guided Missile Battle Cruiser) in the Kirov class even if they are all rusting hulks these days.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    23. Re:sounds like trouble by Zarquon · · Score: 2

      [Clears throat]Damn the torpedos! Full Speed Ahead!

      Ring any bells?

      http://www.encompass.net/~ctyson/civwar/farmain.ht m has a rather lengthy bio online..

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
  9. Oxymoron? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

    The episode's look and feel is amazingly authentic. The story is inventive and the acting surprisingly good.

    Wait a sec. No way it can be authentic to the original and be well acted.

    Much of the charm... of the original... Star Trek was... the wooden acting... not to mention the... inexplicable pauses... in William Shatner's... delivery.

    1. Re:Oxymoron? by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Funny

      The pauses wern't inexplicable .. every pause was his mind repeating in soothing tones, "I look like a goof. But the its worth the pay check. I look like a goof. Buts its worth .. "

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:Oxymoron? by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      I think the original episodes were also slightly longer. I think this explains why ;)

    3. Re:Oxymoron? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      You're right. The acting ranged from "sort of almost decent. Almost." to "oh my God WHERE ARE JOEL AND THE BOTS IN THIS, MY HOUR OF NEED!!!". I'm still trying to figure out why the Andorians stole Chekhov's accent...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:Oxymoron? by ralphclark · · Score: 2

      Yeah yeah, yadda yadda. How many times have I heard this. But the acting in the original Star Trek was anything but wooden.

      It never ceases to amaze me how so many people can blithely keep on repeating stuff they've heard from somewhere without ever checking for themselves to see if it was true.

  10. My God Jim! by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Funny
    These people have too much time on thier hands...

    1. Re:My God Jim! by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      :1,$s/^.*$//g
      :wq!

      save yourself a few keystrokes and use this for your first line:

      :%s/.*//

      does the same thing as your first line.

    2. Re:My God Jim! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :x! does the same thing as the second line.

      GODDAMN SLASHDOT IS TEH HELPFUL

    3. Re:My God Jim! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people have too much time on thier hands...

      Don't you mean "THESE!...People...have...TOO..much...TIME!... on their... Hands!"?

  11. Who knew by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    that all crewmembers were required to be from wisconsin or at least speak as such. Decent work at anyrate, and amazing for a bunch of fans.

    --
    Photos.
    1. Re:Who knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that some kind of crack?

  12. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? Who cares? What is the point of watching a sub-par incarnation of an already-dated TV show. Star Trek's weak SCI-FI is looking more and more like trite each passing year as Sci-Fi fans are getting more and more sophisticated. Please. That whole thing with the stars all the same color (white) and how they never needed space suits is weak.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Like trite?

      That's the answer Mr. Spock!

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  13. 7 years in Minnesota by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    is 49 human years.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:7 years in Minnesota by slim-t · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ah, the old 7 dog years = 1 human year joke, except I think you've reversed it.

      I take it you're from Iowa.

    2. Re:7 years in Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 7 years in Minnesota feels like 49 human years as time moves glacially slow there.

    3. Re:7 years in Minnesota by miltimj · · Score: 2

      Move slow? At least we see the seasons pass... I can't imagine seeing green and brown 24/7/365... yuk. On a side note, it's January and my backyard (in MN) is all grass. :-(

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    4. Re:7 years in Minnesota by rf600r · · Score: 1

      People that stupid and loud are packer fans. Scary bunch.

    5. Re:7 years in Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grub:

      Hey, I checked out the grub.net website, and found valuable information on how to remove a wart cyrogenically, and what happens to mayonaise when you freeze it and then let it thaw.

      If there is someone with too much time on their hands, its you buddy. Get a life!

    6. Re:7 years in Minnesota by dasunt · · Score: 2

      No, that's North Dakota.

      I'm still hoping that they'll invent trees here one day to block the wind.

      Seriously though, don't dis Minnesota. Twin Cities are one of the largest urban centers in the US. Plus, its the home of Mystery Science Theater 3000!

    7. Re:7 years in Minnesota by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Sshhhh! Don't tell people about Minnesota. The first rule of Minnesota club is that you don't talk about Minnesota club!

    8. Re:7 years in Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So with a normal remaining life expectancy, I can expect to live an apparent 238 more years. I'll take that. :)

    9. Re:7 years in Minnesota by vistic · · Score: 1

      This is true. I was born and raised in MN (yay Eden Prairie) and now I live in Phoenix.

      It's like one long summer... that... never... ends. It just sucks the life out of you. There's no lush greens here either. The plants look sickly. But it might just be all that brown dirt we have in abundance, we get dust storms that just make everything here brown whether we like it or not.

    10. Re:7 years in Minnesota by civik · · Score: 1

      Living in MN you seem to have the inside track on tons of MST3k jokes that no one else would get.

      For instance several mentions are made to Minnesota institutions such as: Chanhassen Dinner Theater, Guthrie, Brainerd National Raceway, Crow's latest screenplay: "Peter Graves Goes to the University of Minnesota", And the all important fishing reference "Oh, that'll put your panfish down for a couple hours."

      --
      Make it a malt liquor. I want to be as clever and handsome as possible.
    11. Re:7 years in Minnesota by slim-t · · Score: 1

      Energy Park: Providing a clean place for energy to play.

  14. Recipe for a flash fried server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ingredients:
    1 Website
    5 large Star Trek related Movie Files

    Instructions:
    Post 5 movie files on your website. Have someone post a link on slashdot.org. Watch your webserver cook at 300 degrees until the case is a nice golden brown.

    1. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's OK. It's at mac.com It's the first step in Apple's color-changing patent

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by digerata · · Score: 3, Informative
      The site is slowing down, here is a mirror site until things get back to normal.

      --

      1;
    3. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by grnbrg · · Score: 1
      Ingredients:
      1 Website
      5 large Star Trek related Movie Files

      Instructions:

      Post 5 movie files on your website. Have someone post a link on slashdot.org. Watch your webserver cook at 300 degrees until the case is a nice golden brown.

      Mirror. Rinse. Repeat.

      "Connection Refused" -- The mirror has cracked.

      grnbrg

    4. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      The site is slowing down, here is a mirror site until things get back to normal.

      Looks like you've been /.'d...site came back with "connection refused." Meanwhile, the teaser's coming through from the original site @ 4.9 KB/s...good thing I'm downloading it and not trying to watch it while it's streaming, or the ... pauses ... in ... each ... sentence ...... would ...... be ...... really ......... really ......... long .........

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by SigmundK · · Score: 0

      how nice. TOO BAD I CAN'T FSCKING USE THIS. do convert it to a large divx file, someone? sincerely, a melancholic trekkie

  15. 7 year production? by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They used their own actors, and it took them seven years? Can you see the people age visibly from one scene to the next? That can't be good for continuity. Suddenly the lead actor has gray hair and put on 20 pounds...

    Of course, that kind of thing still wouldn't drop it below the quality of most new shows that issue forth from the bowels of the major networks.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:7 year production? by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget it's Star Trek, having continuity errors only adds to the authenticity...

      --


      Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    2. Re:7 year production? by LordKronos · · Score: 5, Informative

      I imagine a large portion of the 7 years was prep work. Building sets, creating props, sewing outfits, writing scripts, etc. Then there is the post production editing and stuff. I didn't see the site mention anywhere how much time was actually spent filming, but I suspect it was only a small fraction of that (1 or maybe 2 years).

    3. Re:7 year production? by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative

      It says they started shooting on SVHS in 1996, but obviously they couldn't be using any of that footage because of the inferior quality compared to the digital cameras they used in the last year. Not to mention the degradation of the media over time.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:7 year production? by jck2000 · · Score: 1

      Can you see the people age visibly from one scene to the next? That can't be good for continuity. Suddenly the lead actor has gray hair and put on 20 pounds...

      I am paraphrasing from memory, but anyway: "I used to be beautiful. Look at me now!"

    5. Re:7 year production? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they must have spent 6 of those years looking for the only trekkies who weigh less than 300 pounds

    6. Re:7 year production? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't for get that they spent 5 1/2 of those years getting really high, before they even had a script banged up.

      That counts too.

    7. Re:7 year production? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great, so a season's worth of episodes will be... oh 112 years. Maybe the network execs will die off before they get a chance to cancel it.

  16. Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by netsharc · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Captain, I am detecting incoming connection from the Slashdot Quadrant. They have taken all available frequencies! Aarrgghh!!"

    (The console blows up)

    "Red alert, shields up!"

    This looks like a plot by Apple who wants to show off their OS X server (it's mac.com..)

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by realmojo · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are running:
      Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP3

    2. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the flying sparks, and the camera tilting left-to-right and everyone throwing themselves out of their chairs....

    3. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by operagost · · Score: 2
      Truth is stranger than fiction:

      Server: Netscape- Enterprise /3.6 SP3

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      netsharc wrote:

      > This looks like a plot by Apple who wants to show off their OS X server (it's mac.com..)

      It's a plot by Mothra, who:

      1) hates the mean film and music industries (who keep trying to kidnap her fairies),

      2) is bored of getting back at them by hijacking their executives' yachts for rescue missions ("Godzilla vs. the Seamonster"),

      3) finally found herself some nice folks (Apple) with the tools and ability to destroy the media sharks by democratizing the production of movies, TV episodes, and music.

      This episode, the movie "Shanghai Ghetto" (made by two people on a Mac, and played in theatres in NY and LA), and college student musicians with basement recording studios are proof that her plan is working.

      The power to tell stories and sing songs has always been in the hands of the people. It is high time that power returned to the people, where it belongs. Apple will make that possible, and then we will never have to fear the media sharks or their bought legislation again.

      "Our plan understands the sea; we can wait for her coming.
      At the end of noon we'll make our prayer.
      Lightning shines on wavey beach, and all clouds are made right:
      Happiness Appears!"
      From the song "Infanto no Musume" in the Japanese version of Mothra (1961).

    5. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the 'emergency steam valves' which seem to serve no real purpose ;)

    6. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're losing packet containment! Warp Core Buffer-overrun breach imminent! :)

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    7. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by KILNA · · Score: 1

      All of the consoles in every Star Trek series are filled with what appear to be lava rocks when they explode. Suppidat?

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  17. Why EMBED? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Can someone explain to me why webmasters feel the need to embed their movies within their own webpages? Why not just let us download it to our harddrives with a simple right-click? That way (a) people can watch it over and over without added strain on the server and (b) people can distribute the file through other means (p2p, etc.) again saving the webserver. I just don't understand why webmasters make it so difficult to download a movie directly to disk.

    GMD

    1. Re:Why EMBED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > people can distribute the file through other means

      You just answered your own question.

    2. Re:Why EMBED? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed.
      The url's for the mov files are:


      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/teaser.mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actone.mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/acttwo.mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actthree. mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/tag.mov


      And btw mplayer can play these if you have compiled it right and have the proper codecs. Which also means that you can reencode them to something else.

    3. Re:Why EMBED? by TheRealFixer · · Score: 2

      Usually with this sort of thing it's because they're trying to stick with a "theme". The media is designed to fit in with the look of the site. It's usually the product of letting graphic artists have too much say over the site design. Or, in small sites like this, thinking you're a graphic artist yourself.

      The other reason is generally for copy protection. Sure, all you need to do is sift through the page source to locate the URL of the file... but average users aren't going to go through that much trouble, or aren't going to know how to do that. Of course, with these guys, I don't think they're very concerned about copyright, since fan films can be argued to violate all kinds of IP laws. You'd think they wouldn't be that uptight about someone spreading their movie around.

    4. Re:Why EMBED? by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      it was cool of some of you to put the URLS here, I wasn't that generous and had made my own stupid little html page so I could grab the files. Of course, after the first two had downloaded, and the comments on this topic had jumped from 2 to 100+ the speed with which they were DLing dropped significantly. Damn you /.

    5. Re:Why EMBED? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      Scott to bridge: We're losing power Captain. Transfer speeds are at 13kB and falling.

    6. Re:Why EMBED? by johnatjohnytech · · Score: 1

      Dont worry, it kinda fell apart in the middle of Act2. Maybe I will try and finish watching it later. By fell apart, means lost my intereset. Overall a pretty cool effort though.

    7. Re:Why EMBED? by bearklaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It looks like the pages are hosted at Apple's .Mac, and if you use the .Mac services to create a web site with movies, it automatically uses the EMBED tag. Maybe Apple figures people will buy QuickTime Pro just to get the "Save" link working from the player... -BearKlaw

    8. Re:Why EMBED? by statusbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The biggest reason why I hate embedded movies on a website is that I can not select 'Double Size' for the movie. Those movies are very tiny with my preferred resolution and I hate having to change my monitor resolution just to watch a movie in a web page.

      I end up sifting through the html and javascript and grabbing the raw url anyways.

      Oh well,

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    9. Re:Why EMBED? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Funny

      And btw mplayer can play these if you have compiled it right and have the proper codecs.

      On the other hand, QuickTime Player plays these without having to be compiled, and it comes with all the proper codecs. ;-)

      --

      I write in my journal
    10. Re:Why EMBED? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Whatever floats your boat.
      Personally I like to be able to use one program to view everything. I also like my viewer to be opensource (I would also like opensource codecs).

    11. Re:Why EMBED? by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      I would about kill for a non-corporateware version of the quicktime and realvideo codecs that work on windows NT. In fact, if I can help in any way, lemme know.

    12. Re:Why EMBED? by Kiwi · · Score: 1
      I will second Twirlup here, if only because the mplayer crowd is nortorious for flaming people who ask for help. If I have a problem compiling mplayer, and report it to the mailing list, I am sure I would be flamed.

      This is why QuickTime makes sense: No twit who will flame me asking me for help.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    13. Re:Why EMBED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't compile it yourself, then you shouldn't be using it. The mplayer guys provide everything you need in the docs. I'm no programmer, but I was able to get mplayer running on my system since the docs are VERY thorough. They tell you why it won't compile under certain circumstances, what the requirements are and what possible problems you might run into. If you can't read, you shouldn't be using a computer. This even applies in the commercial/proprietary software world. When you go to CompuRama, or download the latest proprietary player, they tell you what the requirements are. If you have an Intel 486 with 8 Megs of RAM, chances are you aren't going to be able to run a lot of proprietary shyte. You read the requirements, so you know that right? Well... when it comes to mplayer, then read the docs thoroughly and quitcher bitchin! It's the best media player for any platform hands down. And it's a breeze to compile. Even for a newbie like me.

    14. Re:Why EMBED? by keyslammer · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, QuickTime Player plays these without having to be compiled, and it comes with all the proper codecs. ;-)

      ... unless, of course, you're running Linux and then you also have to have Wine installed, and the crossover plugin [the free version of which displays regular harassment messages urging you to buy the licensed version].

      And I'm sorry, but I refuse to spend $25 to buy a piece of glue-ware that I very rarely use [and have to move out of my plug-in directory so that my browser can play mp3s] when I haven't paid a dime for an awesome program like mplayer that I use practically every day.

      /rant ;-)

    15. Re:Why EMBED? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Use Mozilla's "View Page Info" feature (Media tab). Gives you a "Save" option for any embedded media in a page.

      What? You're not using Mozilla? Too bad.

      Compliments to those providing mirrors, btw. A lot more helpful than posting more links and encouraging even more /.ing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:Why EMBED? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      unless, of course, you're running Linux and then you also have to have...

      I think my point up there was that people who run Linux on their desktop computers are just looking for trouble, and shouldn't be surprised when they find it.

      --

      I write in my journal
    17. Re:Why EMBED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.eo-video.com/
      convert/plays both

      http://classic.winamp.com/plugins/detail.jhtml;$ se ssionid$FPZYYWSXXFETBTN241GBCYY?componentId=22143
      winamp plugin that handles realvideo

    18. Re:Why EMBED? by Pinback · · Score: 1
    19. Re:Why EMBED? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      And I'd like to find something that's NOT Quicktime that will play 'em on Win98.. any suggestions??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    20. Re:Why EMBED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I hate you n00bs... RTFM before you post to the lists...

      btw, does anyone know how to compile mplayer? i'm stuck at "./configure" .... i'm still lost.

      -1 troll

    21. Re:Why EMBED? by LMariachi · · Score: 2

      You don't need WINE for this. It's Sorenson v1, which is supported directly by mplayer. IIRC, at this point it's only Sorenson 3 that's still a sticking point.

    22. Re:Why EMBED? by keyslammer · · Score: 1

      No, my point was that in order to view the movies embedded (within the web page), you need Crossover plugin/WINE/Quicktime.

      With respect to format, I have yet to encounter a format that I can't view with mplayer.

      If there's a way to set up Mozilla so that it uses mplayer when it encounters embedded QuickTime video, I want to know about it.

  18. watchableness by pummer · · Score: 1

    it might be watchable, but why would i want to watch it?

  19. something tells me... by AssFace · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that these fellas get laid ALL the time. seriously. chicks dig that shit.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:something tells me... by White+Shade · · Score: 2

      "...they both got married during the episode's long genesis and now intend to concentrate on raising their children (Josh has three kids; Jimm has a baby on the way)."

      draw your own conclusions :P

      --
      ìì!
    2. Re:something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, their wives had to have something(someone) to do while their husbands were busy...

    3. Re:something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, anyone who doesn't spend 100% of their time getting laid is wasting their lives. Which of course explains your presence here.

    4. Re:something tells me... by unicron · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Not every woman, contrary to what the actions your mother would lead you to believe, runs a "hot-ass drivethrew" from their bedroom window.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    5. Re:something tells me... by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

      And yours... and, of course, mine...

      --
      This sig left unintentionally blank.
    6. Re:something tells me... by nege · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got mod points, and I would mod you down as overrated (because you are) but then it would be obivious to the metamods that I am just a frustrated geek, who doesnt get any, who is tired of people reminding me that I dont get any.

      Oh well. Keep yer 5.

    7. Re:something tells me... by AssFace · · Score: 2, Funny

      nege, I'll always cherish those words. now hold me.

      If I had mod points, I'd wildly give them about all willy nilly, with total disregard to the law like I always do.

      Especially to that Anonymous Coward guy - he sure gets around. You have to admire his ability to be so prolific and have so many voices.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    8. Re:something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey unicron- your spelling sux. Drivethrew?

    9. Re:something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think I know Jimm Johnson. I live in Minneapolis. He looks very familiar. If it's who I think he is, he used to play in a heavy metal band and got it all the time.

    10. Re:something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, hookers are better anyhow: no baggage attatched to them.

  20. Huh? Canopus plague? by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny
    The U.S.S. Exeter, freshly recrewed and commanded by Capt. John Garrovick, is on a mission to save a ship infected with the deadly Canopus Plague.

    Am I the only one who thought of a scene where the captain opens a hatch to the food reserves, and thousands of video cards drop down on him?

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    1. Re:Huh? Canopus plague? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Hahah :) I always wanted one of those Canopus cards. Had to settle for a Creative Labs 3D Blaster Banshee.

    2. Re:Huh? Canopus plague? by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      I got one of those cards in 1998. Cost $80, made Quake 2 look great on my P2 200 MHz POS. The card even came with a little decal to put on your computer case that said, "I got a Canopus."

      My dorm neighbors and I got a good laugh out of that.

  21. Much better than the latest movie... by dagg · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is much better than the latest Star Trek movie. And I bet it'll even be more profitable!

    --
    Sex - Find It
  22. Similar project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A similar project by finnish sci-fi fans has been on going for about four years. Their Star Wreck VI: In The Pirkinning movie will mix ideas from at least ST and B5 worlds.

    Star Wreck

  23. It will be gone within a week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way Paramount will let this stay up. Their attorney's are probably sending a nasty email to these folks at this very moment.

  24. tng by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is even a little authentic to TNG... notice that the captain does a "picard maneuver" (pulling down on the front of his uniform and straightening his back) while he is talking to that bald dude in the opening movie. i love it!

  25. awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The episode's look and feel is amazingly authentic. The story is inventive and the acting surprisingly good."

    No it was unsurprisingly awful. What's wrong with you people? Oh yea this is Slashdot, not Fark.

  26. Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by hndrcks · · Score: 5, Funny

    when does the black guy in the red shirt get killed by aliens?

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    1. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by jargon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering that myself when I watched it...and lo and behold - a red shirt gets incinerated shortly after getting into the underground fortress. Well done.

      --
      /dev/psychic: No medium found
    2. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by friscolr · · Score: 5, Funny
      starshipexeter.com -> cast/script -> starfleet -> crew -> Ensign Benjamin Halley

      Born in Waterloo, Iowa on April 2, 2245; Benjamin Halley is a non-descript red-shirt who, in the classic tradition, is vaporized early in the script. Like all such red-shirts, the 'X' at the end of his serial number indicates that he is surely doomed.
    3. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by jck2000 · · Score: 1

      when does the black guy in the red shirt get killed by aliens?

      Whose comedy skit contained the line "They turned the brother into a cube!"? (Actually, it was more like an icosohedron or dodecahedron or some other D&D dice shape.)

    4. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose comedy skit contained the line "They turned the brother into a cube!"?

      If I'm not mistaken, it was Franklyn Ajaye.

      "Mister Spock, analyze."
      "Nigga's a cube, captain."
    5. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by fastlink2 · · Score: 1

      Hi /. crowd, I mirrored the movies so everybody can have a look. The mirror is at a site with a 1 Gigabit Uplink and powerfull ZEUS web servers, almost unsinkable ;-)
      Click here to download the stuff.

      Have fun!
      fastlink P.S.: Find out for yourself ... hehe

    6. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by tomkins · · Score: 1

      I can tell you without even seeing it. It happens in the opening scene before the credits.

    7. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      This is amazing. Your link is great, but the funniest thing is watching it drop from 350 KB/sec to now under 50 KB/sec as more and more people find it. Ahh, the slashdot effect.

    8. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Good job, thanks!

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      black guy? Star Trek was pioneering in it's racial equality, and even featured the first interracial kiss shown on television.

      -Nano.

  27. Impressive... by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...the mac.com server appears to be holding up quite well against our Slashdot attacks - I'm getting over 300K/s.

    My apologies if this does it in, but here are some direct links to the portions of the movies (i.e., not framed in HTML pages)

    Teaser
    Act One
    Act Two
    Act Three
    Tag/End Credits

    I think the episode would be better if the dialouge and video sound quality was as bad as the shots and sound effects of the original, but man - this is impressive ambition to say the least.

    1. Re:Impressive... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1


      It's still not letting me save them. At least by save as quicktime movie or save as source. Do I have to wait 100 hours for them to completely load?

    2. Re:Impressive... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1


      Nevermind. Duh. I haven't had any coffee yet.

    3. Re:Impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky for you. Half an hour later, and I'm getting 17K/s. Would somebody who's downloaded the files already put it on a P2P network? I would, but at this rate it'll be another three hours before I have just Act 1-3.

    4. Re:Impressive... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2

      I'm only getting 11K/sec when I normally get much more.

      It...can't..sustain an....attack from the...slashdot.

    5. Re:Impressive... by schlach · · Score: 2

      Lucky for you. Half an hour later, and I'm getting 17K/s. Would somebody who's downloaded the files already put it on a P2P network? I would, but at this rate it'll be another three hours before I have just Act 1-3.

      Here's two free mod-points. =)

      Seriously, Can people who have already d/led these please get them up on the P2P networks? How about renaming them starshipexeter_actone.mov, etc. ?

      Thanks

    6. Re:Impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even /. readers have standards. Okay except that 2 guys living in their parents' basement trying to download from a 56K modem line...

    7. Re:Impressive... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      the mac.com server appears to be holding up quite well against our Slashdot attacks - I'm getting over 300K/s.

      But I bet these guys will be getting a nasty e-mail from mac.com soon informing them that last week's bandwidth consumption of 100 terabytes was slightly over the fair use limit for a personal website!

    8. Re:Impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here they are again:

      Teaser
      Act One
      Act Two
      Act Three
      Tag

    9. Re:Impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Act One [flapdoodle.org]

      Typo.. case sensitive.

  28. attack of the 5 arsed monkey people... by BobRooney · · Score: 1

    I wonder what Will Wheaton's take on this is...I was pleased with his 5-arsed monkey people reference that I heard during the Twighlight Zone marathon this past new year's. Props to Wesley, even if he did wind up on the cutting room floor of Star Trek Nemesis...

    1. Re:attack of the 5 arsed monkey people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      props? What does that mean?

    2. Re:attack of the 5 arsed monkey people... by suckass · · Score: 1

      5 asses??? What on earth would you need 5 asses for? 4 is plenty!!

      --
      blah, blah, blah
  29. Its not watchable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable. ...not anymore

  30. To boulderly go where no man has gone before. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    Gimme Stone Trek anyday!

    Also hosted on Camp Chaos

    The adventures of the BCC-1701 Magnetize are in Flash.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:To boulderly go where no man has gone before. by old-lady-whispering- · · Score: 1

      damn that excessive bandwidth consumption

      --
      The truth suffers more from convictions than from lies.
    2. Re:To boulderly go where no man has gone before. by dwillden · · Score: 1

      The owners of Stone Trek thank you for their suddenly maxed out bandwith.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    3. Re:To boulderly go where no man has gone before. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      The owners of Stone Trek thank you for their suddenly maxed out bandwith.

      It maxes out frequently without /. help. This is why I provided the link to CampChaos, who seem to have less of a bandwidth problem. However, you can only get the Marooned on Tatooine episode from StoneTrek. I suggest getting it and then copying it from your cache to a directory somewhere, particularly if you wish to see it again because you missed something (some humorous background stuff, much of which goes by fast.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  31. My only question is if they time travel by TrekCycling · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously. I've gotten used to the real Star Trek, where this is rampant, so I just can't watch Star Trek unless time travel is involved. Let me know if they go back in time to chase Klingons or get visited by Borg, and then I'm interested.

    1. Re:My only question is if they time travel by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I _so_ wanted "Enterprise" to be based on the U.S.S. Relativity. Alas, they went with the Archer storyline. Ah well, at least they had the decency to cast a former tv time traveler. :)

  32. Take that MPAA! by Telex4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I immediately thought was: cool, people can make fairly decent TV programmes on a tiny budget using the latest digital technologies. It's great seeing people who don't have the backing of the media mega-industry creating their own works. This is just one shred of evidence to add to the list to show that the Internet and open technology is about so much more than centralised shopping and news.

    Then I noticed how long it took them to do it :-)

    1. Re:Take that MPAA! by MrLint · · Score: 2

      Not to worry Im sure paramount is crafting the DMCA notice as we type. But honestly i thinkit because some guys in a garage came up with something better than rick berman could (see the last scene of of the finale of voyager if you wanna see wooden acting)

    2. Re:Take that MPAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you show us where in the DMCA this is covered? Do you even know what the DMCA is about? Do you have any clue what you are talking about or are you just posting DMCA in an attempt to gain mod points so you can continue to post idiocy at +1?

    3. Re:Take that MPAA! by kionel · · Score: 1

      You'd be amazed how many people are making their own stuff, just for fun.

      Let's see:

      http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/2948/fr eaklinks.html

      Okay, a lot of those links are dead, but the few that are active ain't bad.

      Of course, NONE of them are as ambitious as "Starship Exeter". Those guys rented a WAREHOUSE for SETS, for god's sakes!!! Yikes!

      By contrast, our first short, "Steve the Vampire", was shot, edited, and playing on Cable Access and the web in all of two months. Mind you, it ain't all that GOOD, and it doesn't have the production values that these guys obviously do, but we did it...and in far less time than seven years.

      Me? I want to know where they came up with the name "B'fusalek". :-)

      Tony

      http://www.stonesoupfilms.com/

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
    4. Re:Take that MPAA! by Ig0r · · Score: 2

      Just because an act isn't prohibited by a particular law, doesn't mean you can't write threatening letters involving that act and that law.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    5. Re:Take that MPAA! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Me? I want to know where they came up with the name "B'fusalek". :-)

      Isn't it obvious? It's an anagram of "sake flub." The writers were having a story meeting at a Japanese restaurant and... well, the rest is history.

      --

      I write in my journal
    6. Re:Take that MPAA! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2

      Except that it wasn't "their own works." This is just the stage crew pantomiming the cast. I would have been a lot more impressed had these guys taken a property of their own, rather than one already done to death by both its owners as well as the silly "Fan-Fic" people, and created something worth slashdotting.

      Technology is easy (and getting easier and less expensive daily).

      Creativity is hard.

      On a positive note, the success and quality of work of independent film makers is making incredible leaps and bounds. The "latest digital technologies" are a part of that success, but focusing on that is like focusing on
      what word processor an author uses. oh, wait...

    7. Re:Take that MPAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but this is all about trademarks. Last I checked there is no DMTA. They aren't even really related.

    8. Re:Take that MPAA! by MrLint · · Score: 2

      Im sorry i forgot to add for those impaired.

    9. Re:Take that MPAA! by shittles · · Score: 1

      But they were being creative. You don't need to create something wholly original to be creative (indeed it's disputed whether you can be wholly original anyway). One of the biggest problems with copyright law at the moment is that it makes it so difficult to make derivative works like this fan movie. Movies like this should be encouraged, just as many other derivative works should be encouraged. So long as they don't discourage people from creating new works, copyrights should encourage derivation, otherwise they're simply not doing their job (encouraging people to create information-based works for the benefit of the public).

    10. Re:Take that MPAA! by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      It's true they were being creative, but they also were drawing upon a lot of existing material. There are many things that can be taken for granted once you know that this episode is based in the classic Star Trek universe. Also, there's a lot of interest in the episode that simply would not exist, if there wasn't a fan base for the classic Star Trek universe, and if the episode was not set in the classic Star Trek universe.

      It's sort of like building a cheaper, better, Apple clone. You're taking an existing item, and making it better, and because the original was a known quantity, you're benefiting from the attention that the original got.

      You can borrow elements of the original (Hollywood does this all the time), but when you copy substantial portions, you start to really lean on the previous body of work. Consider GalaxyQuest, which was meant as a parody of the original Star Trek series and associated community. They borrowed elements (the obsessed fans, the conventions, the now-stereotyped actors, cheesy plotlines in the original episodes) and wove them into an original story. They however, did not actually incorporate names, ships, or elements of the Star Trek universe.

      This fan-produced episode is impressive, but between the ship, the props, and the music/soundFX, they clearly want you to know there is a link between their material and the classical Star Trek universe. What would be impressive is if someone could get this much attention by producing an original pilot, distributed online (not a short, but an episode-length pilot.)

    11. Re:Take that MPAA! by F452 · · Score: 1

      If they had done something original, we wouldn't be talking about it on slashdot right now. The fact that it's Trek related draws the attention.

    12. Re:Take that MPAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't be surprised to hear that the two brothers, Jimm and Josh LIVED in that studio for part of the time, and that Josh was living in one of the production studios when he met his wife... must have made a great impression! LOL

  33. I'm Watching it now... by 1stflight · · Score: 2

    And it IS quite good, see before the site's saturated and mirror if you can! Now this is the creative power of the Internet, good to see it! And to the people that made the show, good job!

  34. Seven years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to make a Star Trek Episode.

    This one should have been filed under Get A Fucking Life.

  35. Before I watch it, by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 4, Funny


    Will I have to wait another 7 years for the conclusion?

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:Before I watch it, by geekoid · · Score: 2

      would you rather wait 7 years for a good one, or get 7 crappy ones for the next 7 years?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. The future of movies by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is unbelievably cool, not only for itself, but also as a proof of concept. With some experience and technology, perhaps regular groups of fans will one day shoot good movies in a couple of years. This should give MPAA a lot of food for thought - not only about copy protection but also about producing inferior movies like the Nemesis.

    Are there other projects like this on the web?

    1. Re:The future of movies by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

      This should give MPAA a lot of food for thought - not only about copy protection but also about producing inferior movies like the Nemesis.

      I don't think the MPAA sits down and says lets make a really bad Star Trek movie. I think Rick Berman is the one who does that.

      The MPAA might have something to say about using franchises and trademarks of existing properties though.

      There is a good Star Wars based fan film over at http://www.crewoftwo.com Lucas is a fan of fan films. It will be interesting how Paramount will react to Exeter.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    2. Re:The future of movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Hollywood should go to OpenSource movies. They are currently just too proprietary for me. I mean, shit man, all we get is one big finished movie. I'd really rather have the actors and sets always available to me to change the scenes just in case there's a bug in the movie somewhere. I can only trust that when movies are available off the net to download someone doesn't hack my movie first.

      Right now, all we get are these stupid service packs, rememmber LOTR "Fellowship of the Ring"? I'm still havent upgraded to SP2 on that one!

      Argg!!!!

    3. Re:The future of movies by iamacat · · Score: 1

      You mean "Scary Movie" actually got permission from Scream, 6th sense and Blair Witch project?

    4. Re:The future of movies by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I remember years ago seeing something about how a bunch of college students did a prequel to Logans Run - called Logan One I think. They built sets, made costumes, even made their own little monorail car. Don't remember where I saw that, but it was some 5-10 minute blurb somewhere.

      Also, there have been some halfway decent Dr. Who fanmovies made too.

      Look at ifilm, atomfilms, etc... If you dig around, you can find some cool amateur films - some a little more well done (George Lucas in Love comes to mind).

      Only problem is the massive amounts of storage/bandwidth required to host these things. Makes it kinda hard for you to easily just pop something of decent quality up there and still make it easy for people to see (ie...don't get bored after 25 minutes of trying to download it and move on)

  37. Nemesis by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    Just last night, I was thinking about the train wreck that is Star Trek: Nemesis, and thinking, "Ya know, somebody ought to write a different finale for the cast and crew of TNG that would truly do them justice."

    Nemesis was far too tame, and far too stale. If I want Wrath of Khan, I'll watch Wrath of Khan.

    How many times have we seen the Enterprise run right up to the brink of oblivion, only to save the day and turn everything back to normal in time for the next episode? I think I would have written something that resulted not only in the destruction of the Enterprise, but also the deaths of most (if not all) of the crew in a heroic, personal struggle.

    Maybe in a few years one of these fan groups will do TNG justice.

    1. Re:Nemesis by NudeZiggy · · Score: 1

      the real problem is that they need a reset button for the movies at least or else all the freaks out there will bitch and wind about the movie not being conclusive enough.

  38. I can't stop it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Captain, there's a runaway slashdot effect! It's draining the dylithium crystals and there's nothing I can do about it!

  39. Direct download the vids... by Randolpho · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:Direct download the vids... by pgrote · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the links!

    2. Re:Direct download the vids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheers dude!

    3. Re:Direct download the vids... by schlach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hate to cross-post, but...

      Can people who have already d/led these please get them up on the P2P networks? How about renaming them starshipexeter_actone.mov, etc. ?

      Thanks

    4. Re:Direct download the vids... by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please do put these on Kazaa or Winmx. Going to the website after it's been slashdotted and already it took about a half hour to get a minute or so of the video. I'm looking at a 1.6 kb download happening. From the minute I watched already I love this thing. Quick please, before Paramount swoops down in their stolen Bird of Prey and lobs a couple of antimatter torpedos on these guys. -Sorry couldn't help that last bit. :-)

      --
      Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  40. Of Paramount Importance... by Kaemaril · · Score: 5, Funny

    I predict that the Paramount Legal Away Team will soon be setting phasers on "heavy bitchslap"...

    1. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 2

      Funny, but, AFAIK, they have no legal grounds for complaint.

      IANAL (nor do I play one in Star Trek fanfic), but I don't see any infringements here, except maybe the theme music.

      They wrote an original screenplay, and didn't use any video or sound clips owned by Paramount, so they didn't copy anything. They also didn't use any Paramount trademarks, that I noticed. Nowhere do they use the term "Star Trek" or any of the Star Trek character names. Unless Paramount has registered some of the generic terms like "Starfleet Command", "The Federation", "Andorians", etc., they should be fine there.

      They have copied the appearance and style of the ship, uniforms, sounds, etc., but AFAIK, "look and feel" lawsuits don't fare any better for TV episodes than they do for spreadsheet programs.

      The only thing I can see is that they may have violated the copyright of the author of the original music. I think they performed the music themselves, so they may be liable for mechanical reproduction royalties to whomever wrote the Star Trek theme.

      Anyone with a better understanding of IP law care to comment?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by Grit · · Score: 1

      How about "Klingon"? In any case, little things like lack of grounds for suit never stopped an IP lawyer from sending threatening letters...

    3. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 2
      Did they mention Klingons? I couldn't see the whole show...

      Granted that threatening letters can be sent without grounds, some of the small things these guys did (like changing the starfleet emblem) make me think they've covered their bases, and possibly even checked it out with their own attorney, in which case a threatening letter isn't likely to bother them too much.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The didn't change the emblem, in TOS the emblem that is on the uniforms for the Enterprise is the emblem for that ship only. It isn't until the first movie that Starfleet adopted the Enterprise insignia for the entire fleet.

      OK, OK, I'm a NERD. So what? So you are YOU so THERE!

    5. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 2

      OK, OK, I'm a NERD. So what? So you are YOU so THERE!

      I am outclassed, and bow before your superior nerdness.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      I suspect they're fried six ways from Sunday, to use the legal jargon. I was watching and counting rip-offs for amusement. Mind you, I think they did an excellent job recreating the original. Gene would be pleased. Truly difficult would be to count the novelties.

      Humorless greedbag Paramount, on the other hand... 6 years ago they threatened a few dozen fan sites to drop their image and .wav collections in order to increase traffic to their for-profit official Trek site. (I assume they backed off?)

      The rule is that derivative works are part of the original copyright. Some things like parodies are fiar use exceptions. Critically, the work need not mimic the original to nonetheless be derivative, rather it need only evoke the original in style or appearance or whatever. Here, the sight of the ship -- with music -- was more than enough. Even the door-slide effect sounds the same.

      One of the tests is "substitution" -- could the new work displace demand for the original in the marketplace, or reduce the market for derivatives (such as by saturation)? Here, sure; they've basically produced a low-budget sequel, not that the original was high-budget.

      Then there's trademark.... They could go to town here.

      Disclaimer: I think the work is really cool, but wish they had applied their talents to either getting permission or coming up with new material. In case the lawyers come, I suggest the producers begin making their own Klingon® weaponry.

    7. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by Grit · · Score: 1

      They used "Klingons" in the synopsis on the front page of their web site; I have no idea about the actual show.

    8. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I managed to download the show, and, yes, Klingons play a large role.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by bfoozlover · · Score: 1

      to cross post... look at the News page on their site and read some of the articles done on them, and you'll find that Eugene Roddenberry (Creator, Gene's son) has written to them with blessings. GO figure, Paramount isn't going to fry them afterall.

    10. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but ... is Eugene the rights holder? I doubt it.

      Also, the pseudoTrek claims copyright over their clearly derivative work, which I esp. doubt Paramount would sanction.

    11. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 0

      I am not sure, but I believe Paramount is allowed to create Star Trek episodes under license. I do not believe Paramount holds all the rights. I may be wrong.

  41. Wesley not completely cut... by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 1

    my wife said she saw him at the wedding. I went to pee, so I missed it. Was he supposed to have a bigger part?

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
  42. Trek history... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Long time Trek fans will recall that the Exeter was one of the original 12 Constitution-class starships. Others included Constitution (obviously), Enterprise (duh!), York, Potempkin, Hood... that's all I recall off-hand.

    The old AMC U.S.S. Enterprise I built with my Dad when I was a bout 8 or so had decals for all twelve ships with appropriate call numbers (NCC-1700, etc).

    I'm sure the classic, original Technical Reference Guide, with its silly "20th century equivalent" electronic components probably has a listing, but mine's in a box somehwhere.

    p.s. I live in a subdivision called "Exeter".

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Trek history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p.s. I live in a subdivision called "Exeter"

      Does it, too, have a history of buggery?
      Before or after you moved in?

    2. Re:Trek history... by pomakis · · Score: 5, Informative
      According to this site, this is the complete list of Constitution-class starships during the original Star Trek Series:

      • USS Constellation (NCC-1017)
      • USS Constitution (NCC-1700)
      • USS Defiant (NCC-1764)
      • USS Enterprise (NCC-1701)
      • USS Excalibur (NCC-1664)
      • USS Exeter (NCC-1672)
      • USS Farragut (NCC-1647)
      • USS Hood (NCC-1703)
      • USS Intrepid (NCC-1831)
      • USS Lexington (NCC-1709)
      • USS Potemkin (NCC-1657)
      • USS Republic (NCC-1371)
      • USS Yorktown (NCC-1717)

      The site also gives episode references for each of these ships. This is what it says about the Exeter:

      NCC-1672 Encyc., TOS "Court Martial"
      (identified by wall status display)
      Captain Ronald Tracey TOS "The Omega Glory"
      Abandoned in orbit around Omega I
      It's interesting that in this list the USS Exeter is given the NCC number 1672, but the guys who wrote "Starship Exeter" gave it the number 1706. This was either an oversight on their part, or it's supposed to be a different Exeter.

    3. Re:Trek history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird. My Original Series Tech Manual gives it as 1706, which makes sence since it was in the same batch of Constitution class ships as the Enterprise. Not that Trek is known for consistancy or anything.

    4. Re:Trek history... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Depends on your source, I think. IIRC, the old Tech Ref Manual listed them as 1700-1711. I don't suppose the contract numbers are canon, even if (at least some of) the names are.

      The TRM goes on to list later generations including dozens more Constitution-class ships as well as several other versions from scouts and tugs to my fave, the "Dreadnought", with 3 warp nacelles.

      Those starship types don't show up in the later "Star Trek History of Space Flight" (or whatever it was called) book. I don't know how rigidly Paramount managed that sort of thing, so finding contradictory info might be easy.

      I don't want to get into the whole "what is canon and what isn't" thing, it's just a freakin' TV show. However, I do think the idea of making new episodes in the vein of TOS is really cool, especially if there's good continuity with established history (like "Federation", which was the best Star Trek book I ever read).

      I'm DL'ing the episode by modem, so I'll get to enjoy it tomorrow.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:Trek history... by fldvm · · Score: 1
      "Dreadnought", with 3 warp nacelles.

      www.geocities.com/atrahasis1/ascension.html

    6. Re:Trek history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. Second half of the alphabet gets dissed!

    7. Re:Trek history... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      The Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual circa 1975 by Franz Joseph shows a similar list of Constitution class vessels, with the following changes.

      the Defiant is not listed.

      Excalibur is numbered NCC-1705,

      Exceter is NCC-1706,

      Farragut is NCC-1702 (lost in the line of duty),

      Hood is NCC-1707,

      Intrepid is NCC-1708 (lost in the line of duty; presumably replaced with the NCC-1831 you cite),

      the USS Kongo (NCC-1710) is added,

      Lexington is NCC-1703,

      Potempkin is NCC-1711,

      the USS Valiant (NCC-1709) has been added to the list, but is listed as lost in the line of duty; and

      Yorktown is NCC-1704.

      So there is some flexibilty to the canon, it would seem. Regardless, I've already spent much more time on this than I meant to. I really do have a life. Honest.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:Trek history... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Not literally, but in prior years the Home Owner's Association did a lot of that figuratively.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  43. Old-style klingons by SAN1701 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or the old fashioned klingons were far better vilains that the new ones? I mean, old klingons were cynical, smart, dissimulated, and very dangerous.

    But NG's (or motion-picture) style klingons are irracional, fanatic, even dumb, and it's by no way credible that this kind of civilization would ever manage to build any kind of science or engineering.

    Note that both know how to be brutal, but the first ones used brutality as a tool for their objectives, and, for the new ones, it's an almost biological characteristic.

    I remember that I've read, in a magazine, that the klingons of the 60's represented the enemies of the U.S. in that time (China, USSR), and, the klingons from 80 to date, represented the new ones (fanatics). It may be, but, as vilains, the previous generation of Klingons were way more fun.

    1. Re:Old-style klingons by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think they explained this by having some sort of "north" and "south" Klingons. The North klingons were the old ones, the ones who were more intelligent, who created most of the technological inroads. The Southern klingons were gun-crazed rednecks who slaughtered the Northies and took over the empire. And that's why the Klingon empire is now doomed to fade into the background of the Trek universe. Right? :) Maybe I have it backwards.

    2. Re:Old-style klingons by SAN1701 · · Score: 1

      Hummm... It may be, but, in "Enterprise", 100 yrs before NCC-1701 adventures, the governants of the Klingon Empire were already from the dumb species... I think they have to be very creative mantain a plausible timeline ;-)

    3. Re:Old-style klingons by steveha · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The new-style Klingons made their first appearance in the first theatre movie (Star Trek: The Motion Picture). Gene Roddenberry was asked why the Klingons looked different, and he explained that "they always looked that way".

      There is just no good way to explain why all Klingons in movies and TV from Next Generation on are bumpy, and all Klingons in the prequel TV show Enterprise are bumpy, and the 1000-years-previous holy guy Keh'less (or however you spell it) was bumpy, but all the Klingons ever met by Kirk looked like Fu Manchu.

      The word "retcon", short for "retroactive continuity", was coined for situations like this one.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:Old-style klingons by B3ryllium · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Old-style klingons by PD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is just no good way to explain why all Klingons in movies and TV from Next Generation on are bumpy, and all Klingons in the prequel TV show Enterprise are bumpy, and the 1000-years-previous holy guy Keh'less (or however you spell it) was bumpy, but all the Klingons ever met by Kirk looked like Fu Manchu.

      Actually, there's an excellent explanation: the budget for the old TV show was much smaller than the movie and subsequent TV show budgets.

      I don't know why people always overlook the obvious.

    6. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But NG's (or motion-picture) style klingons are irracional,
      > fanatic, even dumb, and it's by no way credible that this kind of
      > civilization would ever manage to build any kind of science or
      > engineering.

      Please can somebody mod SAN1701 down as this is clearly a racist
      comment. Really, I thought we left all this nonsense behind us
      but apparently there are some people who still think black are
      dumb and irrational. If it was up to me, I'd disable your /.
      account.

    7. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But NG's style klingons are irrational, fanatical, even dumb, and it's in no way credible that this kind of civilization would ever manage to build any kind of science or engineering.

      Holy shit, we've managed it. Or are you claiming humans aren't irrational, fanatical, and dumb?

      I'll never understand what drives people to make comments like this. As if you know so much about the development of extra-terrestrial societies! You've had the chance to study exactly ONE planet's social interaction and development, and what holds true here would not necessarily be the case on others.

    8. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about?! Klingons never had anything to do with black people. Not in the 1960s. Not today. Everyone involved with writing, producing and acting the show agrees that the Federation's enemies were political devices. Not racial. Not religious. They represented the Russians, primarily. They were depicted as shrewd, ruthless negotiators, etc.

      Please cite your references for your racial theories.

    9. Re:Old-style klingons by SAN1701 · · Score: 1

      How in hell can you say that????? I was just comparing the way the old klingons behave with the new ones. It's you who is implying any racist consideration.
      And, if this does matter to you, I am very less "white" then you might think.

    10. Re:Old-style klingons by lunatik17 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course, this entire argument is kind of thrown for a loop after watching that DS9 episode, "Trials and Tribble-ations."

      Dax: That is a Klingon?!
      Worf: We do not talk about it!

      I realize that whole episode was tongue-in-cheek, but boy did that make the continuity problems even worse :)

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

    11. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, one DS9 episode had three Klingon captains who had encountered Capt. Kirk (reprised by the original actors in at least two cases) and they all had bumpy heads.

    12. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      DS9 blew away both the "north-south" and the "they always looked this way" explainations.

      Four Klingons (including Kang, Koloth, and Kor) that appeared in ST:TOS resurfaced on DS9 and embarked on a quest to fill a blood oath with Dax. So these Klingons had appeared in both forms

      As far as the "they always looked this way" theory goes, there was the DS9 episode "Trials and Tribble-ations" where the Defiant was thrown back in time and they found themselves in the middle of "The Trouble with Tribbles" episode. Several crewmembers of the Defiant were on the K7 space station and not only was the Klingon's different appearance noticed, O'Brian and Bashir didn't even realize they were Klingons. Wolf stated that reason for the change was not something that Klingons talked about with outsiders.

    13. Re:Old-style klingons by charlito · · Score: 1

      I've heard the same thing said about the symbolism of the klingons (actually, it's supposed to apply to all sci-fi... the unconciousness of america). I find it amusing that the newer klingons seem to represent those of middle eastern descent (and i think i see the borg as a darker version of america).

    14. Re:Old-style klingons by tarogue · · Score: 1

      > and the 1000-years-previous holy guy Keh'less (or
      > however you spell it) was bumpy ...

      According to The Startrek Episode Guide, The Savage Curtain (Production 77, 3/7/1969, Stardate 5906.4):
      [...] Kirk, Spock, Lincoln and Surak, founder
      of the present Vulcan culture. On the "bad"
      side are, Genghis Khan, Colonel Green, Zora,
      a vicious killer, and Kahless, father of the
      Klingon Empire as it was now known. [...]

      In that episode, Kahless was a typical '60s, non-bumpy Klingon.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all. -- Thomas J. Kopp
    15. Re:Old-style klingons by Psion · · Score: 2

      Oh, don't be so serious with "Trials and Tribble-ations"! It was conceived from the beginning as a tongue-in-cheek episode in the very tradition of the Original Series. The production crew just wanted to have fun, and that throw-away line was intended to simply poke fun at the fans who have debated this topic since 1979.

      Klingons always looked bumpy-headed. Even TOS Klingons. 1960's television cameras, however, lacked the resolution to properly capture the subtle detail. But when we finally saw them on the big screen, that's when we saw what they were really like. It's just like the subtle hull plating on the the motion picture Enterprise. Really.

    16. Re:Old-style klingons by sconeu · · Score: 2

      At the risk of sounding like a fanboy...

      The "Savage Curtain" version of Kahless came from Kirk's imagination. No nit.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    17. Re:Old-style klingons by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      klingons are irracional, fanatic, even dumb, and it's by no way credible that this kind of civilization would ever manage to build any kind of science or engineering.

      I don't know. It seems to have worked out alright for the U.S.A.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    18. Re:Old-style klingons by CaptainMunchies · · Score: 1

      Wait ....

      Are you saying Star Trek isn't real?!?!

      My life is a sham. [/sarcasm]

      --
      Spam removed for the Internet's pleasure ...
    19. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember where I read this, and it may not even be "canon", but there was some comment about the non-bumpy Klingons of TOS being genetically altered to appear more like other races. The argument was that the Empire wanted to be mysterious and guarded (maybe like the Romulans in TNG?), and even chose to hide their true appearance from aliens. This would make sense in light of Gene Roddenberry's comment that Klingons "always looked that way" (bumpy as they do now). Oh well, it's all just TV shows / movies / video games / a fanatical cult. ;-)

      Qapla'!

    20. Re:Old-style klingons by steveha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nonsense. It doesn't take much budget to make Klingons look bumpy. They could have done it in the 60's; they just hadn't thought of it yet.

      If Gene Roddenberry had decided that Klingons had big bumpy foreheads, the makeup guys would have made it so.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    21. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the makeup guys then would have
      realized that the "bumpy look" makes klingons
      look hydrocephalic and disproportionate.

    22. Re:Old-style klingons by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      It seems to have worked out alright for the U.S.A.

      Ah, so the Klingons imported most of their smart people and ideas from other cultures? ;-)

    23. Re:Old-style klingons by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      Ah, so the Klingons imported most of their smart people and ideas from other cultures? ;-)

      A cruel blow! My analogy crumbles at the merest whiff of fact. Oh, well.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    24. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I always thought this was the best explaination: Google link.

      -cmh

    25. Re:Old-style klingons by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, I think there's an answer to this entire question stuck in that DS9 episode right in plain sight.

      You got old (real old) Klingons like your thousand year old Keh-Less (sp? who knows?) and then your hundred year before TOS Klingon from the Enterprise series and they're bumpy looking. Then right in the middle of it you got the TOS Klingons with their smooth foreheads and human looking hair with very perfect teeth to match. The answer is obvious.

      The Klingons obviously went through a "fad" of sorts where they indulged in things like plastic surgery, hair implants of some sort, and dental work. Maybe they wanted to look more like the Terrans, Vulcans, and Romulans or something, who knows? Regardless we only saw a handful of Klingons relative to the entire species.

      Anyway the decadent and superficious Klingons who were running the show during Kirks time were obviously overthrown or simply fell out of favor and the Klingons returned to the "old ways".

      That or we just accept the fact that the budgets sucked and they're "the same" but that's the best we could manage in the 60's/

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    26. Re:Old-style klingons by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. It doesn't take much budget to make Klingons look bumpy. They could have done it in the 60's; they just hadn't thought of it yet.

      Yeah, just pull out a hammer and Bonk Bonk on the Head.

      Hammer: 69 cents.

    27. Re:Old-style klingons by dswensen · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to point out that I believe the previous poster to be talking about story explanation, not real-world explanation, or to just assume that you're being witty. I guess I'll do both.

  44. Star Trek Fan Business Plan by Randolpho · · Score: 1

    1) Create Fanfic Episode 2) ??? 3) Profit!!!

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  45. Now if I can only... by RumGunner · · Score: 3

    Beat the rest of the slashdotters in getting the movie from the homepage.mac.com site! Then I will rule the geek universe with my advanced knowledge of everything and anything that is Trek related! That will obviously make me have more sex appeal with the ladies, just like Cpt. Kirk!

  46. Re:Hey, has anyone.. by magister707 · · Score: 0

    when you asked that, for some reason i got a hard-on that wouldn't quit.

  47. fanfic taken to a deeply disturbing extreme by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you say to your friends, "You know what would have been cool? If they had gone to a planet where...", and they agree, that's normal fan behavior.

    When you actually write up the idea you were thinking of in a 200 word concept and share it with your friends, who all like it, that's committed fan behavior.

    When you flesh out the concept to a 10 page script treatment, that's borderline wierd fan behavior. If your friends offer revisions to correct continuity errors, that's definitely wierd fan behavior.

    When you write out an entire script in three acts and actually perform it with your friends, that's borderline obsessive fan behavior. Defintiely obsessive if you film the process.

    When you perform it with homemade costumes, props, etc., and have special effects and a musical score to go with the footage, and then reformat the film as downloadable Quicktime videos for all the world to see, you are ready for film school.

    Either that, or the plastic pointy ears you wear to bed every night are cutting off the flow of blood to the brain.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:fanfic taken to a deeply disturbing extreme by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's not "wierd behavior". It's weird, but then again, weird is spelled weirdly (no "i before e except after c" rule)

    2. Re:fanfic taken to a deeply disturbing extreme by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

      When you write out an entire script in three acts and actually perform it with your friends, that's borderline obsessive fan behavior. Defintiely obsessive if you film the process.

      Ah, fer cryin' out loud, they were just a bunch of guys having fun. Why psychoanalyze them? We all do stuff other people think is weird.

      I know you aren't seriously harshing on them, but there are a lot of posts here on the "they have too much time on their hands" theme. Well, most of us who post to slashdot probably have too much time on our hands, too.

      Some people like to make Star Trek(ish) movies, some of us scream like idiots at football games, and some of us raise snakes, whatever. It's all harmless recreation. We shouldn't be so quick to put down other peoples' interests just because we don't share them.

      I admire their thoroughness. A lot of people talk about doing stuff like this on a lark, but they actually did it. That puts them ahead of most people.

      P.S. This is a general rant only partly directed at the parent.

    3. Re:fanfic taken to a deeply disturbing extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should have set your post to the music from Alice's restaurant.

      Baaaa daaaa daaaa,
      ba dump da daaaa,
      ba dump da daaaaa,
      dump ba da da da daaaaa

      It all started 7 Thanksgivings ago, which is 7 years ago on Thanksgiving...

      After a fabulous Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat, I turned to my friends and said, "You know what would have been cool? If they had gone to a planet where..."

      And after listening to my idea for 25 minutes, my friends all nodded and said, "You know, I think you're right!"

      So with tears of joy in our eyes, we gathered up digital cameras, props, and implements of intergalactic destruction and proceeded to make the movie.

      ( 7 minutes ballad )

      And the judge said, "Why is Paramount suing you?"

      So I proceeded to show him the 97 minutes of 800x600 glossy color action and animation with full Sorenson codec quicktime compression and 8 part midi harmony...

      It was then that I noticed that the judge had on his desk a "friend of the court brief" from RIAA quoting their position on the DCMA. It was at that point that I realized this was likely to become another case of American blind justice...

      ( 7 minutes ballad )

      And the babe said, "What were you arrested for?"

      "Making my own Star Trek movie."

      And all the babes moved away from me on the bench....

      "And violating "the man's" anti-napster DCMA!"

      And they all came back, shook my hand, and said, "You're our man!"

      ( 7 minutes ballad )

      But imagine 2 groups, 2 groups walk in, show a home made Trek movie and walk out...
      They'll think there is still a market for Star Trek and write an episode about Wesly's academy days.

      But imagine 3 groups, 3 groups walk in, show a home made Trek movie and walk out...
      They'll think its a movement. And thats what it is, the Anti-Star Trek Sucky Episode movement....

      ( 7 minutes ballad )

      You can film any Trek you want....
      if a digital cameras what you bought

      You can make any Trek you want....
      if Adobe premiere is what you got

      Just dub in Jim's voice
      it's an easy hack
      A little sampling and McCoy is back

      And you can make any Trek you want....
      Just don't tell Paramount

    4. Re:fanfic taken to a deeply disturbing extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha :D mod up plz

  48. Pot, meet kettle; kettle, pot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Said the guy posting his with the five-digit Slashdot userid and a big old page of lengthy comments.

  49. Missing one thing: by Mudhiker · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's just about everything you'd want from a Star Trek episode but the Captain getting it on with a green-skinned vixen down on the planet. Darnit, I wanna see some alien nookie.

    --
    "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
    1. Re:Missing one thing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can't get it in real life, they can't possible get it in their fan made movie... Think they really can pick up green babes from bars to star in their movies ?

  50. One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    The movies are in QuickTime format, and there is no QuickTime player for Linux.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:One Problem by dinivin · · Score: 2


      MPlayer works on x86 linux, as does using Quicktime through wine (or, if you'd rather, you can purchase the Crossover product from CodeWeavers).

      Dinivin

    2. Re:One Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What.....

      Tried MPlayer....LATLEY ?

      Works for me.....
      Then again it took me a week to compile it right :)

    3. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Fine, you come over to my place and set up Wine.

      Mplayer play's .mov files? Interesting.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    4. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      And there you go. I am not going to wait a whole damn week for one program to compile properly.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    5. Re:One Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running Linux for free but purchase software for it??? Hell no... I'll run Windows for $150 and play quicktime movies for free. :-) Yeah, my first troll.

    6. Re:One Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't need Wine, you just need mplayer.

      personally, I do "emerge mplayer", wait 15 minutes or so, and I'm done.

    7. Re:One Problem by damiam · · Score: 1
      Mplayer play's .mov files? Interesting.

      Yep, and the newer versions support Sorenson 3 and QDesign Music codecs through the Quicktime DLL's.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    8. Re:One Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you'll be missing out. mplayer plays more formats than any media player on any platform these days.

    9. Re:One Problem by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      If your box is fast enough to play Quicktime in the first place, then it should be fast enough to compile mplayer overnight. Even a 200Mhz Pentium Pro can compile Mplayer overnight.

    10. Re:One Problem by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      And there you go. I am not going to wait a whole damn week for one program to compile properly.

      If it takes a week to compile a program, you need a new computer. Linux 0.99something only took an hour or two on my 386SX-25, back in the day...more recently, mplayer took maybe 10-15 minutes (I wasn't counting) to emerge on my Gentoo box @ home (Athlon XP 2400).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    11. Re:One Problem by demon · · Score: 1

      And so does the latest Xine.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    12. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      first you have to have updated versions of GCC. Figures RedHat wouldn't put out any RPM updates for their users.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    13. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      over night? LOL Fuck that. It's SOOO not worth it.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    14. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I can compile GIMP in about 30 minutes or so on my PII 300MHz w/ 128MB RAM

      The only problem now is installing updated versions of GCC.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    15. Re:One Problem by Kourino · · Score: 1

      Updated versions of ... !? Unless you're running ecgs pre-2.90, you don't really need to update GCC with every release :) egcs-2.91 will still compile the kernel. (Thank akpm for this one.) Otherwise, I'm guessing you've got 2.95? (Unlucky you if it's 2.96 before .96-85.) If you had 3.0, I could see wanting to upgrade to 3.2, since it's an obvious improvement. But really, if you have 2.95, there's no clear need to upgrade. 2.95 still works fine, thanks.

      Of course, if you have something before 2.95, you probably should have upgraded it a long time ago anyway -_^

    16. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I'm running RedHat Linux 7.2 out of the box, most of the updates are security updates (e.g. if there was no RPM release/update for an RPM package, I don't have it unless I've removed the RPM and installed from source). Here's the output when I run ./configure:

      [root@dream-worlds MPlayer-0.90rc2]# ./configure
      Detected operating system: Linux
      Detected host architecture: i386
      Checking for gcc version ... 2.96, bad
      Checking for gcc-3.1 version ... not found
      Checking for gcc3 version ... not found
      Checking for gcc-3.0 version ... not found
      Checking for cc version ... 2.96, bad

      *** Please downgrade/upgrade C compiler to version gcc-2.95.x or gcc-3.x! ***

      You are not using a supported compiler. We do not have the time to make sure
      everything works with compilers other than the ones we use. Use either the
      same compiler as we do, or use --disable-gcc-checking but DO *NOT* REPORT BUGS
      unless you can reproduce them after recompiling with a 2.95.x or 3.x version!

      Note for gcc 2.96 users: Some versions of this compiler are known to miscompile
      mplayer and lame (which is used for mencoder). If you get compile errors,
      first upgrade to the latest 2.96 release (minimum 2.96-85) and try again.
      If the problem still exists, try with gcc 3.x (or 2.95.x) *BEFORE* reporting
      bugs!

      GCC 2.96 IS NOT AND WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED BY US !

      *** For details please read DOCS/users_against_developers.html ***

      Error: Bad gcc version

      Check configure.log if you do not understand why it failed.
      [root@dream-worlds MPlayer-0.90rc2]#

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    17. Re:One Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dah, get rid of that trash. Use slack.

    18. Re:One Problem by Kourino · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. The infamous gcc 2.96. Recommend 2.95 or 3.2.1. You can also tell MPlayer to disable sanity checks in configure, that will let it build with your version of gcc. I would recommend a different compiler since that one's been known to be wonky, but if you're using 2.96-110 you're a bit more likely to be okay.

    19. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Well, I've ATTEMPTED to upgrade, but after I've installed gcc 3.2.1 core and gcc 3.2.1, I re-ran ./configure and got the same message (I also got a bunch of errors during make and make install). Next time I go through it I'll make sure to capture all the output (errors included) into a text file and post them on the i-net.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    20. Re:One Problem by Kourino · · Score: 1

      Try "CC=gcc-3.2 ./configure" instead of "./configure". It looks like the new gcc won't install as the default compiler ... maybe? Instead it installs as "gcc-3.2", leaving the 2.96 version as "gcc". That's how Debian 3.0 is set up right now (except they use 2.95.4, bless their hearts), also how I have my LFS set up. Don't have a RH system, so I can't directly test it. (Hehe, late response, but maybe (I hope?) this will be of use to you.)

    21. Re:One Problem by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll try that.

      And that didn't work. It's like GCC 3.2 didn't install at all (probably all those errors). Oh well. Thanks for the help anyways. I'll have to work on this for a while. Might rejoin one of the area LUG mailing lists.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  51. Whether or not a library was linked... by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... this looks like a derivative work to me.

    --
    Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    1. Re:Whether or not a library was linked... by Sludge · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know you're a nerd when you analogize a star trek movie to the linking step of binary compilation.

    2. Re:Whether or not a library was linked... by iapetus · · Score: 2

      Is that a problem? They have made source code available, after all.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  52. Can we have an interview with these folks? by Valar · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I can ask, so, how does it feel to not get laid for 7 years?

    1. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just tell us?

    2. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So I can ask, so, how does it feel to not get laid for 7 years?

      Or you can ask any married guy over forty-five. Same answer.

    3. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Doesn't anyone EVER read the linked stories, or what? Duh!

      From the Pioneer Press site:

      But they both got married during the episode's long genesis and now intend to concentrate on raising their children (Josh has three kids; Jimm has a baby on the way).

      Looks like they pretty much did :-P

    4. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both those guys are married, according to the Pioneer Press article, so they are probably doing just fine.

    5. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by yppiz · · Score: 2, Funny
      So I can ask, so, how does it feel to not get laid for 7 years?

      You've certainly asked the right group.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    6. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      Get back to me in a couple of years and I'll let you know. :-(

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    7. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by certsoft · · Score: 1
      So I can ask, so, how does it feel to not get laid for 7 years?

      It felt pretty much the same then as it does now after 12 years :)

    8. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by bfoozlover · · Score: 1

      Josh Johnson's wife delivered a baby this summer, at home with only the help of him, the blue-skinned andorian. (hopefully Dad was not in full make-up, that would scare the baby) Their midwife got there 45 minutes later. Seems that his wife put a new meaning to speedy delivery with less than an hour of labor. ouch! Congrats, Josh!

    9. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Here to Josh and Jimm, I hope they have a very happy life together!

  53. Quicktime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to check this out but it's in that shitty quicktime format. Why not use mpeg? Quicktime is a sack of weasel nuts.

  54. where's the download URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I could see was several places to click to watch a portion of the film in the browser.

    how about a nice single mpeg file. sheesh people. stop wasting bandwidth by making us stream it every time we want to watch it.

  55. Re:The Angelfire site you are trying to reach has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Angelfire site you are trying to reach has been temporarily suspended due to excessive bandwidth consumption.

  56. The only way I'm going to watch this ... by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 2


    The only way I'm going to watch some grainy, home-produce Star Trek episode if it includes one of those hot 'green skinned' chicks who's wearing a Jennifer Lopez style dress and has an obligatory interpretive dance scene.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  57. Alternate downloads by Alari · · Score: 0

    I'm sharing out the files on Kazaa(lite) ...

    --
    I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
    1. Re:Alternate downloads by gadlaw · · Score: 1

      That's wonderful. I'm looking for them right now. Same file names or one big one? :-)

      --
      Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  58. The Difference by yndrd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can almost guarantee that this production, however amateur, is infinitely superior to any recent Paramount effort for one simple reason:

    The people who made it are passionate about the subject matter.

    The best years of Star Trek were when people with a love for the material were in charge of the shows/movies. I'll let the Slashdot crowd argue about when those were, but I think the current failure of Star Trek isn't one of story or budget or marketing: it is one of passion.

    Commercial Star Trek is a cheap hustle, fleecing idealistic and naive fans. It's always been that to some extent, but there was once some feeling behind it. Too bad Star Trek fans are now just a demographic to be exploited.

    1. Re:The Difference by Lightwarrior · · Score: 2

      I'm torn; part of me wants to tell you that it's naive to assume there was ever any passion behind Star Trek, and another part of me wants to tell you that Next Gen had that passion.

      Clearly, I'm biased ;)

      I didn't enjoy ToS. It might just be an age gap (I'm in my early 20s), and I probably saw Next Gen first. I enjoyed Nemesis, and feel the movie series should end on a good note.

      OTOH, I couldn't care less for DS9, VOY, or ENT.

      As for passion, it doesn't exactly equal success - and shows have to be successful. Firefly was my second favorite show of all time (might have made it to first after a season or two), and Joss Whedon n' crew were nothing if not passionate. Damn FOX for all eternity.

      ---

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
    2. Re:The Difference by yndrd · · Score: 2

      It's obviously a matter of opinion, but I think that several episodes (from both TOS and TNG) show an idealism beyond simple money-making--an idealism I don't see often in the franchise anymore.

      As for the difference between success and passion, I guess it all depends on the definition of success. I want to be entertained by something that has some meaning, and I consider any work that does that to be successful. Whether or not the slavering morons of the common television audience enjoy it really doesn't matter to me.

    3. Re:The Difference by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

      Although I am sure the point of every commercial TV show is to create revenue, I agree with you that the passion is lacking in today's Trek.

  59. Good for them by dswensen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure many of the comments here will amount to "these guys have too much time on their hands" or "haw-haw, these guys can't get laid," but I say good for them. Criticizing and tearing something down by making snarky comments on the Internet is the easiest and least impressive thing in the world.

    Actually doing something is hard. Especially something as eccentric as this. These guys had the passion and the perseverance to make something -- to start a project many people would consider too expensive and time-consuming to bother with, and they saw it through to completion. I have to respect that.

    More than once I've heard people say something like "wouldn't it be cool to build some cheap sets and make our own episode of (Star Trek, Star Wars, X-Files, My Mother the Car)", but these guys actually went ahead and did it. Which, despite whatever shortcomings the film project might have, is a hell of a lot more impressive than sitting around talking smack about it.

    I watched this a few days ago, actually, and it was fun to watch. The people who made it have a lot of love for their subject matter, and put a lot of work into the little details, which I appreciate. And that big pink dinosaur is a riot -- and as special effects go, still beats the heck out of that "lava monster" Spock mind-melded with in that classic Trek episode.

    So I say good for them, and I hope it doesn't take another seven years for the sequel.

    1. Re:Good for them by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      This movie was posted to some usenet binaries groups a few weeks ago as "an un-aired Star Trek pilot". Some comments:

      >>>Actually doing something is hard.

      No, doing something *GOOD* is hard. Doing something that blows is easy.

      >>>More than once I've heard people say something like "wouldn't it be cool to build some cheap sets and make our own episode of (Star Trek, Star Wars, X-Files, My Mother the Car)

      You hang around with some very wierd people. No sane person would say that and really mean it.

      >>>The people who made it have a lot of love for their subject matter, and put a lot of work into the little details

      This is Star Trek, not Shakespeare. A "love for the subject matter" is not something to be proud of.

      >>>and as special effects go, still beats the heck out of that "lava monster"

      Yes, the original Trek sucked and had cheezy sets and crappy special effects. Duplicating stuff that sucks is not a great feat.

      I loved the original Star Trek --- when I was 12.

      30 years later, I'm old enough to know better.

    2. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hang around with some very wierd people. No sane person would say that and really mean it.

      Well, judging from your attitude, I'd rather hang with his friends than with you. They seem a lot more interesting, and certainly more fun.

      I loved the original Star Trek --- when I was 12. 30 years later, I'm old enough to know better.

      Yes, now you're 42 and spending your time trolling and flamebaiting on Slashdot. You've really come up in the world.

    3. Re:Good for them by Silicon+Avatar · · Score: 1

      Goodness, wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? Forget to toggle that 'post anonymously' checkbox?
      Duplicating stuff as an homage because you enjoyed it when you were, that IS a feat. Especially when it is trivial to do better now.

    4. Re:Good for them by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know how they were able to afford to put it all together (one example from an article states that they rented a warehouse for two years for the sets) and if they expect to eventually make any money from it.

    5. Re:Good for them by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Nice post. I just hope they don't end up on some lawyers' dart board....

      Forgive me for saying you were beginning to sound like one of those Apple ads. :) You know:

      Here's to the crazy ones.

      The misfits.

      The rebels.

      The troublemakers.

      The round pegs in the square holes.

      The ones who see things differently.

      They're not fond of rules.

      And they have no respect for the status quo.

      You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them,

      disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them.

      About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.

      Because they change things.

      They invent. They imagine. They heal.

      They explore. They create. They inspire.

      They push the human race forward.

      Maybe they have to be crazy.

      How else can you stare at an empty canvas and see a work of art?
      Or sit in silence and hear a song that's never been written?
      Or gaze at a red planet and see a laboratory on wheels?

      We make tools for these kinds of people.

      While some see them as the crazy ones,
      we see genius.

      Because the people who are crazy enough to think
      they can change the world, are the ones who do.

    6. Re:Good for them by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Please, God, no, that was not my intent.

      I don't think making your own Star Trek episode is THAT profound by any means. Nor would I endeavor to do it. Nor am I even jealous. I just think it's cool that someone had the cajones to start, and then finish, such a crazy plan. But, all respect to the filmmakers, world-changing stuff it sure ain't.

    7. Re:Good for them by praedor · · Score: 2

      What you say is true and for just actually getting it done they get kudos... But that doesn't mean that they can get laid. They can't.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  60. OH NO! by mustangdavis · · Score: 2



    .... we're gonna get sued! ....


    This is what the creators will be saying as soon as they see a Paramount Studios IP address in their web logs :)


  61. Re:Star Wars sends the wrong message, I am afraid. by parnasus · · Score: 1

    It would appear this AC hasn't read the Troll FAQ yet. Not only is it offtopic (Star Wars != Star Trek), s/he does a poor job setting up the Rabid Right-Wing Conservative position. Just jumps straight in.

    Perhaps next time. *sigh*

    --
    --If you code for the exceptions, the rules fall into place
  62. trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    this reminds me of the guy in "Trekkies" -- the guy who was working on his own script, and had his own uniform design for his (and his friends) "starship".

    you know who I'm talking about.

    you know: the guy who had a rendering of his starship on his computer, looking like about AutoCAD 11, and when you saw it all you could say was "cool!".

    1. Re:trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you know that Captain Garrovick and B'fuselek are actually in that Trekkies movie? If only for a moment, they appear in full costume.

  63. Man...those guys are nerds by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

    Wow, I thought I was nerd...but after seeing that, I think I'm not to bad after all.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  64. Check out Star Wreck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wreck is a series of parody movies based on the Star Treck.

  65. how big... by zogger · · Score: 2

    ...how big are all the files combined? I am wondering if I even have space for all of them on my old coal burner here, I'd like to get all of them so I can watch it all at once, and thanks for your efforts!

  66. She cannot take it... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    She cannot take it anymore capm'n. The server, I think she's gonna blow.

  67. Velour by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

    If it was socially acceptable I'd drape myself in soft velour. . .

    --
    This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
  68. Am I the only one?? by SuperDuG · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ... who thinks this sucks? I mean jesus these aren't highschool kids with a little free time after school, these look to be grown adults running around a park and then probably their parents basement. I mean what would say, their co-workers or immediate family have to say about this? Are they going to be proud of it? I've done my share of crap movies (exact caliber as these) but they were for some type of theatre or acting type classes in which you had to create a script and film the damn thing.

    You want to know what I think really does it for me? The lack of music, that was the greatest thing of every single star trek, or any science fiction movie for that matter. I like star trek just as much as the next guy but I'm going to go back to my original thought here.

    There is a difference between a star trek fan and a weirdo ultraobsessive person. Fans go and see the movies, sometimes buy memorabillia (games, DVD's, etc.) ... ultraobsessive's they dress up in star trek uniforms and go to "conventions". You know the movie Space Quest ... exactly ... that wasn't meant to be a "parody" that was meant to make fun of every ultra obsessives wet dream.

    Plus to top it off, they used a mac with non-standard video codecs ... and they want to be called geeks?

    Am I the only one here who thinks this??

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Am I the only one?? by glwtta · · Score: 2
      that wasn't meant to be a "parody" that was meant to make fun of every ultra obsessives wet dream.

      Out of curiosity, what is your exact definition of "parody"?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Am I the only one?? by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
      "parody" movies are those which include, Austin Powers (james bond), Naked Gun (every cop/investigation movie), Scary Movie (all the scary movies), Not Another Teen Movie (all the teen movies), and so on.

      Galay Quest (which I mistakingly called Space Quest) was meant to poke fun at the UltraObsessives mentioned above. I placed "parody" in quotes to discern between the word and the classification. I felt this movie made fun of the lifestyle more than anything. It's not necessarily a parody. A parody of the lifestyle would have been A group of people who learn everything they can about ... growing pains ...

      So that's what I mean by a parody.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    3. Re:Am I the only one?? by hicktruckdriver · · Score: 1

      Galay Quest (which I mistakingly called Space Quest) was meant to poke fun at the UltraObsessives mentioned above.

      And note that in Galaxy Quest (Space Quest was a series of excellently funny Sierra On-Line adventure games!), the "UltraObsessives" saved the day. Both that and the documentary "Trekkies" which came out at the same time were exceedingly funny in their portrayals of said fanatics, but neither was mean-spirited.

      --
      darius
    4. Re:Am I the only one?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A horse can put together a better argument.

  69. Better Than Nemesis by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

    LOL! It's better than Nemesis!

  70. Ick!! by flikx · · Score: 1

    Ugh. I hope that this is not what I can expect to happen with Firefly within the next few years. * VOMIT *

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  71. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the frik?! Don't you have anything better to do? I hear there still isn't a cure for cancer.

  72. Watchable? by istartedi · · Score: 2

    You mean the thing was watchable and should be watchable again as soon as this story is off the front page.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  73. Interesting observation by Raul654 · · Score: 2

    The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable.

    Not any more...

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  74. Actually... by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Paramount is touchy about this stuff. I don't see any evidence the producers got permission -- in fact they claim copyright on the credits page. Permission is easier to get before than after. There are some trademark issues here, too, I think.

    One hopes of course that Paramount has a sense of humor and goes along. Technically all that fanfic stuff violates copyright and trademark, too. Paramount should formally give permission to prove it is policing its stuff. Maybe Exeter did get permission and hid it somewhere....

    It does look like they did a nice job (which is exactly what possibly gets them in trouble) but what bothers me is the sort of stranglehold on scifi creativity Star Treak has had by virtue of its success. Everyobody seemed to have transporters, "energy weapons", and annoying characters with apostrophes in their names (like ah'Choo or Phtt'tt). It took real creativity to break out of this mold, as in shows like Babylon 5 and Farscape, not that these are perfect (Trek sure wasn't).

    Maybe these folks should have gone where no nerd had gone before?

    1. Re:Actually... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have every right to claim copyright on the movie. The movie and the script are original works and are therefore are immediately copyrighted when put into a concrete form.

      As for Paramount, they probably could make a big stink and intimidate the producers of the movie into some sort of settlement (since they of course have deeper pockets) but in truth this probably falls into the realm of fair use, much like the Star Trek parodies on SNL, etc.

      It is especially important to note that the name of the movie does not include Star Trek anywhere. It also does not use any names from the original shows and movies. In general there is not enough to really call this infringement.

    2. Re:Actually... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      theres been fanmade comedy films parodying star trek before, that go by the name of 'star wreck'.

      if they don't say that it's set in STAR TREK universe with STAR TREK characters doing STAR TREK STUFF and that it is a STAR TREK episode they should be in clean waters..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      break out of this mold you say... How about Ka D'Argo in Farscape? ;)

    4. Re:Actually... by RoundTop-VJAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok... time for me to dredge up my business law class here...

      Here is the problem. A parody or criticism falls under fair use (such as a news article or an SNL sketch), as long as a) they can tell it is such, and b) it is one of those 2 things.

      If however the work is a derivative of the work (in this case Star Trek) then the viewer should expect that it is a proper work, as such it breaks copyright.

      These guys unfortunately don't have a leg to stand on, paramount could slap them with a cease and decist order quickly and take them to court for this easily... and win.

      Fair use is not "as long as it works or is good". Only critisism or parody (see Wierd Al's case with I forget what rapper). See UAW v. Michelin.

      It is also true that the script and movie are copyright to these guys, they are infringing on trademarks of Paramount.

      --
      RoundTop

    5. Re:Actually... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      I am going back completely on my original post here. This has absolutely nothing to do with Copyright infringement. They are not using a script written by paramount, they are not using clips from Star Trek movies or shows, and they aren't even using names from Star Trek. This is an original work that is heavily influenced by Star Trek.

      Now if you want to talk of trademarks then they can not (and do not) use the Star Trek name or any other word, phrase or symbol that is a registered trademark of Paramount.

      This is not a derivative work since it is not based on any existing script and it is not fair use because it doesn't use any copyrighted materials at all.

      I would also point out that fair use is far more than criticism and parody. Take a look here for a full definition.

    6. Re:Actually... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      ...It also does not use any names from the original shows and movies...

      But it sure as hell uses the original music!

    7. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyobody seemed to have transporters, "energy weapons", and annoying characters with apostrophes in their names (like ah'Choo or Phtt'tt)

      These all existed looong before star trek ever existed.

    8. Re:Actually... by FrozenCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually there is alot of original scfi stuff like Farscape, no that was cancelled by TV execs. Well there is FireFly, no that too was cancelled by TV execs (at least in Canada).

      Looks like its not the lack of creativity but the the TV execs lack of imagination and faith in original content being marketable.

    9. Re:Actually... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Permission is easier to get before than after

      "It is easier to beg for forgiveness than it is to ask for permission" (or something like that).

      I'd think that getting Paramount's blessing beforehand would have been difficult to get and having it would likely have involved all sorts of nitpicking, effectively killing the project.

    10. Re:Actually... by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      Fanfic is a lot of fun, and I think it should be allowed, unfortunately copyright law bans derivative works based upon an original work without permission, except for parody. Technically, fanfic is a derivative work, but most producers leave it alone. If you piss off your fans, soon you won't have any. If Paramount decided to be pricks, they could say that this is a parody.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    11. Re:Actually... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Hey, they cancelled the original Star Trek, too. :)

      Execs are terrified of original content. They know one fiasco could be a career-ender.

    12. Re:Actually... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Uh oh... This just showed up on Tech TV...

      I have a bad feeling these guys are in for some nasty legal paperwork from Paramount in the very near future...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    13. Re:Actually... by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is really just an extreme case of fanfiction, not much different from Star Wars shorts you can download from theforce.net (if you haven't seen "Troops" -- start there!!) Do you have any idea how VAST fanfic is? Here's a hint: in 1984, just the *index* of =known= Star Wars fanfic (probably about comparable to Star Trek fanfic in volume) was around 200 pages in 6 point type. The actual "one of each" SW fanfic collexion (sponsored by LucasArts) *fills* a double garage over in Santa Barbara.

      (BTW, do you know what subgenre of fanfic Shatner and Nimoy both collect? :)

      In general, studios leave fanfic alone, so long as it's nonprofit, and doesn't violate some arbitrary rule (like George's "there is no sex in the SW universe" -- which is why SW slashfic, tho very popular, is underground to this day). Selling fanzines to cover printing costs and postage is acceptable. As to copyright issues, that's long since been beaten to death (including by fanfic-writing lawyers, with varying degrees of cluelessness) but when it's come down to push and shove, essentially the studio can assert copyright on the fanfic as a derivative work. LucasArts has been involved in some court cases about that, but they soon learned that 1) they couldn't stop it anyway, and 2) nothing serves so well to keep fan fever alive, thus money coming into their coffers.

      As to how the studios do protect their material, they generally confine themselves to prohibiting distribution of actual images from film or TV, and being very hardassed about attempts to market novels to Real Publishers. Essentially, you need to already be on the studio's contract to do that. (Fanfic novels are ignored so long as no one ever attempts to sell them to a publisher.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A local theatre here in Salt Lake City, Utah did just that -- made a complete parody of Star Trek called "Star Wreck". It was very well done and the acting was better than this fanfic production, not to mention very funny.

      Well Paramount sued over this production, even though it was a clear case of parody.

      The theatre that put on the production had to close the show, as they did not have the money for court costs.

      Knowing this past behavior of Paramount, it is easy to read the tea leaves here -- shields up!!!

      The sad thing is that it us, the nerds, who made Star Trek what it is today. Without us, Paramount would have no franchise to sue over in the first place. It was us that kept it alive through faithfully watching the shows, buying books, putting on and attending the early cons, writing early fanfic, and talking about it with friends and family.

      It is clear that Paramount does not know who their "real" Star Trek family is.

      eclectro

    15. Re:Actually... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      This is really just an extreme case of fanfiction

      So you're saying it's "just" a more extreme version of something that's already illegal? And this strengthens your case how, counselor? :P

      It basically comes down to enforceability plus a cost-benefit analysis. There have been many attacks on fanfic, lots of nasty letters, and even some litigation. Look at chillingeffects.org. And ... yes I've seen the "slash" stuff ... unfortunately. :)

    16. Re:Actually... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      That's my point. Fanfic, while ALL technically illegal, is best regarded as advertising where someone else bears the cost of producing and distributing the ad -- so rather than drive it underground (because you can't stop it), might as well USE it. Some of these "ads" are more "acceptable" than others, depending on the content owner's level of paranoia. Enforcement typically only happens when actual original material is used (hence chillingeffects.org) ... since by now most have noticed what Paramount understood real early on: nothing makes a franchise like a self-feeding fanbase.

      And contrary to what some of these fans think, the fan does not own the copyright, not even for the original plots or characters built within a copyrighted venue. Some of the most hilarious flame wars in the olden days had to do with this issue, even tho LucasArts already had a court precedent in their favour some years previous.

      And... oh, so you DO know what sort of fanfic Our Heroes collect... [beg] Nimoy's kid David (also a fine director) tells a funny story about that :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go to the news page on their site, you'll read in the articles done so far on them that these guys DID get some kind of blessing from Gene Roddenberry's son Eugene... Evidently, people at Paramount HAVE contacted them and told them they LIKE it!!!!!!

  75. Re:YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, would make Santa Claus vomit with rage!

  76. Well Done! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    It's not everyday that I get to watch a Trek show during lunch. :-)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  77. The reason it took 7 years... by Timmeh · · Score: 2
    You've got to understand something about Minnesota, most people get snowed in the better half of the year. Actors can't act if they can't make it out their house. Between the above, and factoring in car stalls from the cold winters and the occasional polar bear attack, it's no wonder it took so long to finish...
    ok, ok... so I exaggerated... a little.. (it's actually been quite balmy in MN as of late, thank you global warming!)
  78. Mod this up. by Kludge · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, it comes across as flamebait, but I too am sick of going to web sites with movies that I can't watch because apple is too lazy to type "make" on a linux box.

  79. To our Canadadian friends : PLEASE SEND HELP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our constitutionaly elected government have been overthrown by big business! We are no more that the big bannana republic to your south!
    P.S. - PLEASE SEND BEER!

  80. the new opening voice over by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    Fanspace, the final frontier.
    These are the voyages of the committed fringe.
    Their continuing obsession:
    to film strange new fantasies,
    to seek out new geek prestige and maybe girlfriends,
    to boldly go where no fan has gone before!

    cue music

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  81. NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing.. by Mad+Man · · Score: 4, Informative
    IMO, a CC is closer to "NCC" than a CV-ish name like "Enterprise." What the heck does the N stand for, anyway?


    Although commonly believed to stand for "Naval Construction Contract", NCC doesn't stand for anything at all, according to the StarTrek.com FAQ at http://www.startrek.com/information/faq.asp?ID=136 5
    (there should not be a space in "1365")


    What does the starship registry prefix "NCC" mean?
    The Starfleet starship registry prefix "NCC" doesn't officially mean anything other than it is the standard prefix for starships in service. There have been other prefixes, notably "NX," denoting a prototype, or experimental vessel. The two most famous ships with this prefix would be the U.S.S. Excelsior NX-2000 and the U.S.S. Defiant NX-74205. Once the U.S.S. Excelsior was rendered operational, the prefix changed to the standard NCC.

    When Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was asked this question, he replied that there was no significance to the letters and numbers comprising the registry of the U.S.S. Enterprise. At the time Star Trek first aired, airplanes commonly had "NC" on them, and adding the extra "C" updated the look. Original series art director (and avid pilot) Matt Jefferies has commented that he chose the "1701" combination of numbers because it was legible from a distance and the numbers wouldn't be confused. Other numbers, like 3, 2 and 5, were not used for this very reason. Also, the extra "C" in "NCC" was a nod to the Russian abbreviation for the old Soviet Union, "CCCP." According to Jefferies, "If we do anything in space, we (Americans and Russians) have to do it together."
  82. Mirror (for when the inevitable happens) by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1
    My computer/server's going to get its ass kicked, but here goes:

    teaser.mov
    actone.mov
    acttwo.mov
    actthree.mov
    tag.mov

    I'm still downloading the files, but they should be up soon. I'm still pretty good transfer rates, and the first part is already complete.

    (this is going to be the most violent slashdotting EVER)

    1. Re:Mirror (for when the inevitable happens) by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      (that should have been "still getting pretty good transfer rates")

      transfer rates are down to 7.5kbytes/sec, which is an indication one of us is getting a LOT of traffic.

  83. Re:Nemesis and TNG justice by Kevster · · Score: 1
    Maybe in a few years one of these fan groups will do TNG justice.
    ...and maybe Wesley Crusher's part won't get cut from it. Maybe Wil could advise them?
    --
    I always equivocate. Well, almost always.
  84. Starfleet tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't tell me about Star Trek conventions -- it's nothing more that Rum, Sodomy and the Lash!"
    -- Winston Churchill of Aldeberran XXIII

  85. Yes but to they have anyone that by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1, Troll

    can yell.

    KHAAAAAAAN!!!!!

    It can't be real Trek with out that.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  86. 4:3 vs. 16:9 by leomekenkamp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The one thing I absolutely *loved* about TOS (The Original Series) was that they had 16:9 displays everywhere. This was ofcourse years before anyone in the electric biz started talking about this format for television sets.
    Such a shame that feature is missing, and they have the boring old 4:3 display layout. Maybe NCC-1701 was more advanced than any of it's sister ships? It was Starfleets flagship ...

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  87. spelling... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

    Seize is another weird one.

    The improved i-before-e rule.

    (Now, a rule with too many exceptions is useless, but hey, it's English.)

    If you're convinced you're a champion speller, try this and this -- then post your results here. :)

    1. Re:spelling... by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      Interesting link. If you look at the exceptions, most of them come from words that were borrowed from french, where e before i is the norm..

    2. Re:spelling... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      YEAH. It's THEIR fault! :)

      Spelling is funny; I can't stand it, but I really can't stand bad spelling -- in final-form works, not here.

  88. Paramount WILL Sue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without a doubt, they suck royally!

  89. The Future of Martial Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's got Kirk-jitsu!
    Earth's most fearsome fighting style
    where close enough counts...

    Bravo to these folks!
    Hope it was as fun to make
    as it is to watch.

  90. Re: by Bastian · · Score: 2

    That joke is always redundant. Always.

  91. Re:Star Wars sends the wrong message, I am afraid. by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    No, I think these dolts keep a stable of halfwitted tirades around for a quick copy-and-paste. This one lacked the energy or presence of mind to edit "Star Wars" and "George Lucas" references.

    If I were going to write a right- or left-baiting comment, I could do a heck of a better job than this. Show some self-respect AC.

  92. Roddenberry seal of approval? by mstefan · · Score: 1

    According to one of the newspaper pieces, Gene's son has contacted them, praising the effort and offering support for the project. I wonder if he has any mojo with the studios...

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." --Albert Einstein
  93. Re:Star Wars sends the wrong message, I am afraid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But his heart's in the right place!

  94. Bravo!! by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I fully agree with you here. Those people who go around poo-pooing other people's projects as being a waste of time, etc. never have anything clever or interesting to show of their own. These star trek movie people went out there and did something. Which is a lot more than most people can say. If everyone listened to the naysayers, we'd still not have airplanes, rock-and-roll, or computers in our homes.

    As for the criticisms that these people aren't going to get laid, I can tell you that this is a huge misconception. This is the real deal from someone who has seen this situation play itself out... If you think it takes a rock band to get four guys laid, then you haven't filmed a movie before. No matter how silly of a movie you have made... if it is screened in public and people know about it, you will have a line of people (male and female) begging to be in your next movie. The difference being that a rock band may attract groupies, but the members of a band can only offer the groupies a brush with celebrity. A movie director can create celebrity. Do you know what some people will do to achieve celebrity status? That guy on Jackass ate a snowcone made from his own urine. Use your imagination.

    I've so far viewed the trailer. If you think that was easy or cheap to make, guess again. Props, costumes, and sets all add up real quick. These people spent a lot of money on this project. Perhaps the only area they are lacking on that keeps this thing from being mistakeable for one of the original episodes is the lighting. Lighting is what usually seperates amateur from professional looking movies. If you go back and look at the lighting on the old star trek shows, you'll see it's pretty dynamic. For simplicity's sake, these people used overhead lights like you see in soap operas. Dead easy to arrange, but gives shadows on eyes unless you have fill-lights.
    1. Re:Bravo!! by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      If everyone listened to the naysayers, we'd still not have airplanes, rock-and-roll, or computers in our homes.

      And if everyone ignored the naysayers, we'd still have Microsoft Bob.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:Bravo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but that's pretty apples-and-oranges to this particular subject. No one is crippled, inconvenienced, or prevented from doing their work by the incompetence of Starship Exeter.

      And if you are, you ought to know better.

    3. Re:Bravo!! by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



      Good example, but not the right point.

      It's one thing to criticize something that has already been done and say that it is such a horrible thing that it should not exist. I'm all for that. We all exercise this right when we decide to watch a particular tv show or repeatedly visit a given restaurant. If the food at a restaurant makes you sick, I'm not advocating that you support their effort because 'at least they tried to mix fugu with spinach.. what an interesting concept!'.

      I'm saying that if someone has an idea for something, they should never let their fear of failure put the kaibosh on executing on that idea. Sure, they should examine their idea for flaws, etc. but fear of failure is not only an awful reason not to do something, but it's also the reason why many people never do anything.

      These people who made this star trek show have something that they can be proud of for the rest of their lives. For that, I salute them.

    4. Re:Bravo!! by praedor · · Score: 2

      Whoa there Clarence! OK, perhaps it is a bit strong to say they can't get laid, but it DOES matter by whom (or what). They may get laid (for the first time in their lives) as a side effect of making this film, but the QUALITY of the layee...there's the rub.


      Getting to nail a creature that is actually more pitiful than you is not an accomplishment.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    5. Re:Bravo!! by protohiro1 · · Score: 2
      This is the real deal from someone who has seen this situation play itself out... If you think it takes a rock band to get four guys laid, then you haven't filmed a movie before. No matter how silly of a movie you have made... if it is screened in public and people know about it, you will have a line of people (male and female) begging to be in your next movie.


      People don't need to know about it, and it doesn't need to be screened publicly. When I was making student films (that sucked and were never seen) I routinely got over 150 headshots in response to casting calls. People are desperate and frightening. Auditions end up being a harrowing experience because you quickly realize that a significant percentage of the actors will do ANYTHING to get the part. In a silent student film. It is one of the (many) things that freaked me out about the film industry enough to scare me into another state.
      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  95. Re:Nemesis and TNG justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, AFAIR when TNG was being aired, most fans hated the Wesley character. So what's different now that he commands respect on Slashdot?

    Is running a blog all that is necessary to become a hero here?

  96. Wow. . . by stevarooski · · Score: 2

    "The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable."

    Boy, with rave reviews like that, I bet these guys are damn glad they spent seven years of their life doing this.

    --

    - - - - - - - -
    Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
  97. Barney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like the part where they kill Barney, the purple marketing campain!

    I think when they started this Barney was still pretty big.

    -ac

  98. ATTACK!!! by SansAKilt · · Score: 1

    Set all phasers for slashdot.

  99. the .mac pages are now down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .Mac is temporarily unavailable.
    Your iDisk, Email and published home pages are unaffected.
    For updated .Mac status information, please go to
    http://discuss.info.apple.com

    Link

  100. Pirk! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2

    Aha, Star Trek spoof! For some reason I expected you people to come up with this instead, because that's one helluva funny spoof on Star Trek :)

    1. Re:Pirk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you would like to see the previous movies too.

  101. P2P mirrors by Phaser777 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm now sharing all 5 files on the Gnutella and WinMX networks. In a minute I'll have them on Kazaa too. They're named starshipexeter_actone.mov, starshipexeter_acttwo.mov, etc. I'll leave them up until sometime tomorrow.

    And once you've downloaded them, make sure you share them too (if your DL and shared directories aren't the same)!

    1. Re:P2P mirrors by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I'm now sharing all 5 files on the Gnutella and WinMX networks. In a minute I'll have them on Kazaa too. They're named starshipexeter_actone.mov, starshipexeter_acttwo.mov, etc. I'll leave them up until sometime tomorrow.

      I'll have them up on Kazaa under the same names in a few minutes (they're reading from the CD-RW as I type this). Multiple download sources are always a Good Thing(TM).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:P2P mirrors by Phaser777 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the more people supplying it the better. Not that there's much demand... I've had it out on Gnutella, Kazaa, and WinMX since around 3pm, and there's only been 9 files downloaded (one guy DLed all 5, and a couple people grabbed one or two random files each). This guy's mirror might be why. That's where I downloaded my copies @ 350K, and I just checked and I can still download @ 160K from him. Not bad, considering what large movie files and Slashdot links do to most servers...

      After watching it, I can definitely say they got the poor acting and cheesy special effects right. :) Still, it's impressive for something done on their spare time with no external motivation ($$$, film school project, etc), and far better than I could do.

  102. .Mac outages responsible? by rufo · · Score: 2

    One thing to note is that Apple is having some .Mac outages today. One has to wonder if those outages are responsible for the slow speeds people are complaining about.

    Actually, now that I think about it, I wonder if it's actually the other way around - maybe Apple's .Mac outages are due to increased demand for this?

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  103. who has the less of a life, by geekoid · · Score: 2

    the fan that creates a fan movie, or the people who complain about people creating a fan movie?

    sitting around telling people to get a life, isn't a life, you know.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  104. Thanks by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    I knew if I just shut up, someone else would make the point for me. :)

    One analytical correction that I only realized recently -- a parody is a derivative work, just a kind that's OK. It's derivative because it uses similar characters or plot elements or whatever. The parody must address and comment on the original in some way; it would not be enough, for example, to parody space shows in general, it has to be Trek specifically if you're going to adopt their material.

    Also, you can't use any more material than necessary, and various other provisos spelled out in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose. The basic idea with parody is that you really have to carve out enough space in copyright for free speech to allow criticism and commentary, and maybe a little more. Even if your product clearly did not come from the copyright holder, you still can't get a leg up on their product.

    There are some similar rules for trademark. EFF.org and chillingeffects.org have some good materials on this difficult topic that I'm still trying to understand.

    I started laughing as soon as I saw their uniforms and ship -- I mean, really. Their problem here is not legal so much as creative.

    Here is a typical-sounding C&D sent for what looks like some college kid's fansite. You'd think this sort of this would be irrelevant, but, well...

  105. Sorry, guys, I mean no offense to anybody, but I had to quit watching when the blue dude said, "Commodore Jennings is on line one." ::shudder::

    --

    I write in my journal
  106. I had a great time working on this . . . by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . but they cut me out, in an effort to be as authentic as possible.

    1. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Fraize · · Score: 3, Funny

      That wasn't you in the background, laughing yet with no sound coming out?

      Perhaps they'll invite you to the premier of *this* one?

      --
      --Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was so damn funny that even though you're already at +5, I modded you "Funny" anyway.

    3. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Kiwi · · Score: 2
      Well, the way I see it, it could have been done. Wes would be a time traveler, using his Traveler-given powers to travel back in time to the USS Exeter.

      Hmmm...speaking of which, I wonder if fandom will make the cut scenes with Wes' "wife" canon. If not, then exaplaining why Wes was at the wedding reception is much simpler (he travelled from whatever mythic space-time to be at his old friend's wedding reception).

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    4. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Poor Wil.

      But did they invite you to the real premiere?

      Judging from the box office, Nemesis is perhaps a movie best not to be associated with. Maybe you can get a cameo on Enterprise as your great-grandfather or something? :)

      Seriously, Wil, your mistreatment looms as one of the biggest negatives I can think of relative to "the franchise." Amid all that Star Trek dreaminess, it's easy to forget show biz is a lot more like The Player than Risa. Gratuitous.

    5. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Wil, your mistreatment looms as one of the biggest negatives I can think of relative to "the franchise." Amid all that Star Trek dreaminess, it's easy to forget show biz is a lot more like The Player than Risa. Gratuitous.

      I'd like to chime in with some sympathy as well. For what it's worth, the highlight of nemesis to me was a more keen eyed friend (also a Wheaton fan) pointing Wil out to me at the wedding scene.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    6. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by rweir · · Score: 2

      Best. Joke. Ever.

    7. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Aww, snookums. Console yourself with the thought that when you did appear in Nemesis for those four milliseconds, my good lady wife exclaimed "Was that Wil Wheaton? He's hot!"

      Then again, she was blind drunk at the time. Although I think that I implied that when I said she was watching Nemesis.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  107. Re:Nemesis and TNG justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > ...and maybe Wesley Crusher's part won't get cut from it. Maybe Wil could advise them?

    Speaking of Wesley, I thought it was a nice touch that he made it to the wedding, but I was surprised to see him in a Starfleet uniform. Didn't he drop out of the academy before finishing his last year, and run off to wander space/time like the Traveler taught him?

  108. They got it backwards by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

    So you say they got original story, acting, and direction right, but borrowed the universe in which they were operating to apply all that?

    That's exactly the opposite of standard television, where the universe is almost always original but the stories are recycled, the acting is hack, and the direction is preditable and bland.

  109. Don't forget the Sequel... by questforme · · Score: 1

    I hear it involves look-alike sock puppets..

  110. Star wars fanfilm site: theforce.net by Spy4MS · · Score: 2

    Easy-to-click link
    Troops is my personal favorite--It's a very funny spoof of Cops with Stormtroopers and Jawas.

  111. Wil, you owe me... by Wee · · Score: 5, Funny
    ..one keyboard. A Keytronics KB101. The flatscreen monitor I can clean.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Wil, you owe me... by CleverNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..one keyboard. A Keytronics KB101. The flatscreen monitor I can clean.

      No problem. Just pick it up, and send the bill to Rick Berman, c/o Paramount Pictures.

    2. Re:Wil, you owe me... by Wee · · Score: 2
      No problem. Just pick it up, and send the bill to Rick Berman, c/o Paramount Pictures.

      No sir. Not by a longshot. Granted, the KB101 is old, comparatively rare, and a bit hard too come by in good shape. While while much beloved by me, it's still far too economical for the purposes of retribution -- in this case. Replacement I'd rightly ask for, justice requires a little more.

      Gimme a couple days and I'll find a nice, high-end keyboard that I was using what needs replacing. I'm thinking something in stainless steel, most likely NEMA-rated. It'll be our secret.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  112. Quick, Everybody! by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

    Lean to the left!

  113. Re:Star Wars sends the wrong message, I am afraid. by GoneGaryT · · Score: 1

    Well this is a lovely drop of high-octane babble. The Vietnam War finished just over 13 years ago? Yup, 1989. That makes me.. uh.. much younger (hrmmph). Please send me a lid of what you're on, under plain brown wrapper, if you'd be so kind.

    Offtopic/Troll -1 alsjeblieft

  114. Redneck Klingons? by docbrown42 · · Score: 2

    Send in the Dueling Batliths!

    This has impired a new list:
    You might be a redneck Klingon if:
    1: any part of your cloaked warship is painted primer
    2: You have a shotgun rack on your bridge

    ...well, you get the point.

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  115. Not so fast! by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Funny

    She's dead, Jim.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  116. Use the mirror .... ;-) by fastlink · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi /. crowd,

    I mirrored the movies so everybody can have a look. The mirror is at a site with a 1 Gigabit Uplink and powerfull ZEUS web servers, almost unsinkable ;-)

    Click here to download the stuff.

    Have fun!

    fastlink

    1. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by pyrofx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the mirror! You may regret it after the bill for the bandwidth! If I'm feeling brave maybe I'll mirror it too.

    2. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:
      "almost unsinkable ;-)"

      Sounds like a wager to me!

    3. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by str8 · · Score: 1

      Great mirror! Got about 70KBps from you. Stand by while I copy them to my gnutella directory...

      Will code for SIG

    4. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by denisdekat · · Score: 1

      Thank you so much :) I got ther late, tried a wget from my fastest server but they took them off line, now I get 404 :( But thanks to you I will now see it!! Cheers :)

    5. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by Flossymike · · Score: 1

      Thanks :-)

    6. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Everything is slashdotted. I would be happy to see a few still jpegs for now.

    7. Re:Use the mirror .... ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonderful; got 'em all. Thank you!

  117. Can't beat Minnisota by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

    ... for fun and refreshing home-made sci-fi. First MST3K, now this. Excellent work, guys!

    Keep circulating the tapes.
    GMFTatsujin

  118. Horta by mrscott · · Score: 1

    I grew up on reruns of the original series. Love it! However, my favorite series is DS9 with TNG right behind it. Good acting, awesome story lines, excellent character development, a lot of action and overarching themes on religion, politics, etc.

    The lava creature was a horta - a silicone based life form...

    Truly not 100% a geek - married to a non-geek but just remember these little tid bits.

    1. Re:Horta by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the horta. I couldn't quite recall what it was called, and didn't think it was worth looking it up. Thanks for that.

  119. What a pile of dogshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to a bunch of fucking slashdot wankers to think this is cool. Really, you should all be lined up against a wall and shot.

  120. Toward an end to TOS-bashing by zerocircle · · Score: 1

    I finished watching Exeter and was plagued by this thought: Seven years of amateur effort by dedicated fans can produce sets and props and costumes that are stunning reproductions of TOS design -- but the best sets and props and costumes in the world still look second-rate in the hands of inexperienced filmmakers and actors.

    Acting: Every actor on TOS could and did properly enunciate the dialogue. Despite the popularity of Shatner-bashing (and despite the man's disappointing personal appearances here and elsewhere): When you watch a TOS episode, you see a captain who appears to be busy running a ship and giving serious attention to the things he does. Look at the other leads and you see actors engaged in their characters. (Nimoy, my god, Nimoy.) Even the extras are serious about walking to the other side of the corridor. Whereas, I hate to say for such a passionate effort, Exeter had definitively wooden acting. The one who keeps coming to mind is the Klingon, who talked a mile a minute -- perfectly typical for an inexperienced actor, and awfully hard to hear. Plenty of other times, the actors look like they're just trying to remember where to stand (or forgetting to stand still).

    Directing: Oh, the pacing. Oh, the clunky blocking.

    Camera work: Admittedly pretty good for nonprofessionals, but a bit tighter technique could really enhance the scenes.

    Lighting: This may be the single most deficient element in Exeter. A few good lights, properly arranged, and the whole show would have jumped to life. Well, visually, at least.

    Throughout the whole episode, I kept thinking: Put this script in the hands of the TOS cast and crew, and they'd make something watchable for dramatic and cinematic value. As it stands, Exeter is interesting only for the visual details and, to a lesser degree, the writing.

    It's an admirable amateur effort (in all honesty, I really enjoyed B'fuselek), but it doesn't compare favorably to TOS. If you want ammunition for TOS-bashing, don't load up with Exeter.

    1. Re:Toward an end to TOS-bashing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      I'm of two minds on the lighting. I think the set lighting was outstanding, the colored gels in the andorian complex gave a very good approximation of that sort of set in the TOS period. I don't think principle lighting was that great, however. Most of the time the Captain (who bore a suspicious resemblance to Shane McMahon, of the WWE, only less fit) looked oddly pinkish compared to the rest of the cast. I can't really tell if that was lighting, or makeup, however. I was impressed by the simulated set for the bridge. If I hadn't seen the chromakey Green in the web sites shots of the command chair, I might not have realized it was composited in the background. I think a good deal of what you describe as blocky directing can be attributed to the limited cinematography options they had for the on-ship scenes, in particular. There are certain things that can be done with a full production rig and set that can't be done easily with mockups and compositing. For what they had to work with, they did a marvelous job of covering up the deficiencies. I doubt someone who was a more casual viewer (I once went to school to do broadcast/film production before I started in the software industry, so I've tried to discount the things that stood out to me only because of my training) would have noticed most of the problems.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Toward an end to TOS-bashing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Gah, back to plain text for me... I can never remember to insert

      in html...

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  121. Zionist Preferences At Google, +1, Observant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would the Zionists at Google kindly refrain from reserving the top left portion of the page for stories about Israel bashing Palestine.

    Peace on Earth,
    W00t

    1. Re:Zionist Preferences At Google, +1, Observant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat shit and die, Racist pig.

    2. Re:Zionist Preferences At Google, +1, Observant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely if you are going to take this line then it is Google who are being racist by only portraying one side of the story..... BTW Bush scares me more than Bin Laden.......

    3. Re:Zionist Preferences At Google, +1, Observant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "BTW Bush scares me more than Bin Laden......."

      Well then you're a goddamn idiot. I suppose GWB should sit back and do nothing while Bin Laden and his friends destroy American lives and property. That's a sure ticket to re-election, not to mention a fine way of abondoning his Consitutional duty, which is to uphold and defend the rights of Americans, the people that elected him.

      If you're not from the United States, and you don't like the way we do things, that's fine. Stop accepting the money that you beg us for, and stop dumping your shoddy, poorly made products in our marketplace, and see how far you get. The next time Germany, or some other group of assholes come storming over your borders, you can call some other ally to bail you out. Contrary to your opinion, we can make it just fine without you. Can you make it without us? I think not.

      [Gore apologists need not chime in about the popular vote, or any other bullshit. The popular vote means dick. It's not how our President is elected now, nor has it ever been. Admit that you're just sore about the outcome, and be done with it. Imagine how I felt having to tolerate Clinton for 8 fucking years.]

    4. Re:Zionist Preferences At Google, +1, Observant by joeyspqr · · Score: 1

      uh, and all this has what to do with the Exeter project?

      --
      +1 fashionably cynical
  122. startrek- mov links for download by emotioncafecom · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Can someone explain to me why webmasters feel the need to embed their movies within their own webpages? Why not just let us download it to our harddrives with a simple right-click? That way (a) people can watch it over and over without added strain on the server and (b) people can distribute the file through other means (p2p, etc.) again saving the webserver. I just don't understand why webmasters make it so difficult to download a movie directly to disk." well here are the links-- I am working on posting the movies on my web server now.../. proof!! lol http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/teaser.mov

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actone.mov

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/acttwo.mov

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actthree.mo v

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/tag.mov

  123. The Mighty Exeter by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
    Warships bearing the name Exeter have served with the Royal Navy since the mid 17th century. The first of her name was a Third rate of 70 guns that won battle honours at Beachy Head in 1690. She was broken up in 1698 following a magazine explosion in port.

    The second was a Fourth rate of 60 guns laid down in 1697 and rebuilt in 1740. She won honours off Newfoundland (1702), in the Mediterranean (1711), at Quiberon Bay (1711), and at the Siege of Pondicherry (1748). She was struck from the list in 1763.

    The third of the name was a Third rate of 64 guns laid down in the 1760s. She won four battle honours in one year (1782) at Sadras, Providien, Negapatam, and Trincomalee. She was burned two years later after being condemned as unseaworthy.

    The fourth Exeter, and the one most likely to be the namesake of the Trek one, was a York-Class heavy cruiser mounting six 8" and four 4" guns that was launched in 1929. She won her honours at River Platte (1939) and the Sunda Strait (1942). After being badly mauled by two Cruisers and a Destroyer (which she sank) at Sunda, she sailed for the Indian Ocean with USS Pope and HMS Encounter, but the three ships were boxed in by five cruisers and eight destroyers and were all sunk in the Java Sea.

    The fifth, and current, Exeter is a Type 42 Destroyer launched in 1978. She was awarded an honour at the Falkland Islands and also saw "action" in the Gulf War. She is still in active service.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  124. open source movie sets? by linux2000 · · Score: 1
    Seems ashame to spend all that time and effort to produce only 1 episode. I just had an idea - why not "open" the movie set to others to record their own episodes? Or, accept scripts from creative trekkies on the net, and make a few more ep's from the best ones you get.

    Wouldn't it be cool if there was a publically-accessable trek movie set? Week after week, different people fly over there to participate in some new episode. If you got the inkling, you could be in an episode yourself! "Number N+1, make it so!" Some of us with mediocre acting skills would have a blast with it, without having to build an entire set for 7 years ourselves.

    Maybe some minimum charge for maintenance/repairs, paid by each group of people who wants to use the set. And a scheduling web page so you know when your group can use the set, or join a group if you're on your own, etc.

    Whaddya think?!?!?

  125. Who cares who gets laid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've never figured out why anyone would give a shit about who else is getting laid! The only person you should worry about getting laid is yourself.

    It's not like sex is some contest you win by getting it regularly. Grow up already!

    1. Re:Who cares who gets laid? by Valar · · Score: 1

      watch this:

      haha.

      That's called a laugh. You do that when jokes occur.

    2. Re:Who cares who gets laid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> That's called a laugh. You do that when jokes occur.

      I would have if there had been a joke instead of a bald-faced insult...

    3. Re:Who cares who gets laid? by Valar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      *sigh* I'm sorry if I offended you. Since obviously this was about you. And not someone else.

  126. shut up wesley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :)

  127. What I would do is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make a whole file of the episode, send it to Paramount and ask them to fund "Star Trek: The lost episodes" and get Paramount on board for funds, these guys did it CHEAP, and produce more of the same based upon fan fiction Paramount has grabbed off the net. Imagine 100 shows more, produced at , say, 500,000 dollars apice , that could net a bunch of money for Paramount and add to the Trek Saga! This way everyone could profit with nary a beowulf cluster to be found! The actors would not get tons of money, but perhpas they would get recognition to further their careers. They would get paid and when they pinched the pennies correctly, winners all around! What say you?

    1. Re:What I would do is... by denisdekat · · Score: 1

      Great idea, but what about the lawyers? They are just so sue happy :)

    2. Re:What I would do is... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      They'd probably say it would dilute the trademark (i.e., not up to production values, and too much quantity even for the people who brought us 5 star trek shows). :(

    3. Re:What I would do is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A major studio couldn't afford to acknowledge that TV shows can be made this cheaply. Much like governments, corporations have a lot of excess spending that they need to pretend is required for their output. (Dream on, AC :)

  128. Overwhelms all my preconceived ideas by Heartbreak · · Score: 1

    about Star Trek. I thought for sure I had already seen the ultimate in trekkie fan excess.

  129. Plot Points by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Hey! They got the "Only ship in the quadrant", and "ship full of trainees" thing right too!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  130. LOL, Redshirt by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    They even killed off a redshirt in this one. Too funny.

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  131. No, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is more likely a derivative work than an original. You can copyright characters, storylines, and story settings if they are unique and expressive.... well, at least recent copyright history says that you can. I really don't think the Founding Fathers intended it to work that way.

  132. To Boldly Go by Herkum01 · · Score: 2

    Where no man as loved before!

    For those looking for a Real Audio Link.

    I wish I could give credit to the originial editor of this sound clip but I could not find it. It is a great clip and if you have never heard it before you gotta try it now.

  133. Oh - QuickCrap Format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a note for anyone that doesnt use a 'mainstream' OS - you wont be able to play any of these movies.

  134. Not all of us have Quicktime by Trogre · · Score: 2

    Does anyone have these in a format other than Quicktime?

    Something like DivX would be nice.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Not all of us have Quicktime by sgtron · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean, I'm sick of people leaving linux users out of the game.. fortunatly you can see lots of comments by people here with the direct links to the files. so now you can just download them and watch with mplayer.

      --
      No todo lo que es oro brilla
    2. Re:Not all of us have Quicktime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of us have DivX either.

    3. Re:Not all of us have Quicktime by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Not all of us have DivX either.
      True, but DivX is an open format.
      Quicktime isn't.

      I suspect there are more media players that can handle DivX media than Quicktime media (off-hand, I can think of only two that support QT format: The hideously cumbersome "QuickTime Player" which is only available on two platforms, and mplayer (but only with various hacks applied))

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Not all of us have Quicktime by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      and mplayer (but only with various hacks applied))

      I don't know if you've tried the latest mplayer release, but the ease of setting up quicktime/S3 has vastly improved. Pretty much just throw a couple more files into the win32 directory and compile.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  135. groan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just fucking terrible. Grown men playing like kids in one of the worst TV shows ever made.

    I suppose we should be thankful these idiots won't breed.

  136. P2P download by mlinksva · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:P2P download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ista trick! That is Goatse Trek!
      Just kidding people

  137. Canopus plague... by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    The prime mover of the plot, the "Canopus plague", seems to be a reference to TSR's venerable RPG Gamma World.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  138. And I thought fans liked.. by Dark+Chii · · Score: 1

    to stick to CANON! The USS Exeter is registered NCC-1672 commanded by Captain Ronald Tracey. And I highly doubt there would be two Exeters in in the same exact time period. :P See link: http://www.startrek.com/library/ships.asp?ID=11158 0 You would think that in seven years, they would have looked that information up.

  139. No... by Lordfly · · Score: 1

    That's just Shatner's acting.

    --
    hookers and grits.
  140. It's available via the Gnutella network by sunspot42 · · Score: 2

    For those who can't get thru to the original site or the mirrors. Just search for "Starship Exeter".

    1. Re:It's available via the Gnutella network by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I can't seem to get anything via Kazaa Lite, and Shareaza hasn't found anything yet, nor has it found more than one person to connect to. Good thing the .Mac servers are clearing up. I'm getting 35kB/s anyways, so I guess I'm fine.

  141. Original links are now down by zaren · · Score: 2

    The main htmlified pages are still there, but the big bandwidth sucking stuff seems to be disbaled. From http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/teaser.mov:

    We're sorry, but we can't find the HomePage you've requested. It's possible that:

    The address was entered incorrectly. Check your spelling and try again.

    The .Mac member of this name has either created a page and removed it or has never published a HomePage.

    etc.

    So I hope those mirror sites can stand the load, because they're next on the hit parade! :)

    It's no surprise, though; Apple's quite vague in the allocation of bandwidth for their .Mac hosted stuff - I knew this was going to happen sooner or later, I just didn't expect so much sooner.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  142. Re:Your a buncha fagots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WARNING! Goatse link above

  143. We're sorry... by keyslammer · · Score: 1
    ... but we can't find the HomePage you've requested. It's possible that:
    The address was entered incorrectly. Check your spelling and try again.
    The .Mac member of this name has either created a page and removed it or has never published a HomePage.
    There is no .Mac member of this name. If you'd like this member name for yourself, sign up for a .Mac account right now and have your own HomePage in minutes.

    /.ed, perhaps?

  144. Dear Lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kike lifted his right leg and let go another tremendous fart.

    MERCY!

  145. They deleted the first movie, apparently by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    Wget cut out midstream (connection reset by peer) and suddenly 404 upon reconnect. Guess they just gave up. Damn, already 3% finished, too.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  146. Too bad we can't by Heartbreak · · Score: 1

    pass along the benefits of slashdotting to a few unsolicited advertisers, etc. Why does this only happen to things people actually want to see? Hmmm.

  147. Some Script Pages Hidden (for us, at least)...? by ivi · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's just a matter of
    some of a webpage's images
    failing to load, eg while a
    movie file is slowly oozing in...

    But - just in case - you should
    find 3 -additional- pages of
    script portions (the -last- one
    starting with hardcopy page 21),
    ie just below the 3 whose image
    showed up (for us).

    Hover & click (or - from the
    "last" script page - hit Next,
    at the bottom)

  148. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server, Min Specs..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering when slashdot will post min spec for servers so that we can know we are safe from brutal /.ing??

  149. They're Gone! by jmcnally · · Score: 1

    Well that didn't last long. The files are no longer available at homepage.apple.com/...

  150. Re:NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing by girth · · Score: 1
    airplanes commonly had "NC" on them

    'NC' is the prefix for US registered aircraft
    Here's some information about how the abbreviation works.

  151. They pulled the plug by FS1 · · Score: 1

    looks like apple pulled the plug on the movies. Must either be a bandwidth consumption thing or paramount just scored a direct photon torpedo hit.

    --
    A Fatal OE Exception has occurred, Sig will now reboot.
  152. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what star trek prick mod' this one down?

    1. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one that actually got off his butt and watched the film.

    2. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before or after it was taken off line?

      Typical Trek fan. Can't take a joke.

      Moderation isn't about people with whom you disagree.

  153. Re:idiots by mstyne · · Score: 2

    yeah, pretty rad right? go democracy!

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  154. slashdotted again.. by ammie · · Score: 1

    Just hit. 10,000 hits like that, and they're now looking for alternative servers. Sorry guys.

    --
    {...reality is wrong, Dreams are for real...}
  155. Mirros Plz. Apple Yanked It. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the lawyers have struck early.

    Mirrors?

  156. if anyone has this, put it on Kazaa by sstory · · Score: 2

    please

  157. Really really bad by Arrgh · · Score: 2

    I'm not much of a fan of TOS, but this stuff is really quite awful, even by TOS standards. Sure, it's impressive enough that a bunch of amateurs can put together a project of this scope, but... Geez, did they even watch the footage before they cut it together?

    The Commodore's long-winded speech in the teaser is the lowlight (so far) of the awful acting; the pink monster isn't even funny, let alone believable...

    I suppose now's the time to plug my friend's independent superhero comedy short, Dial "A" for Alphaman, which is vastly more professionally acted, directed and shot. If you need some DV edited or a music video shot, call Mike!

  158. Me, too: Good for them by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1
    Me, too.

    Thanks for that post.

    (Is there anyway I can pre-mod this redundent to save the moderators a moderationg point?)

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  159. Sunk in the Sunda Strait by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

    they SCUTTLED???

    If you want to read of a REAL fighting ship lost in the same location to the Japanese (at around the same time) I'd advise reading about HMAS Perth. There's a decent write up here.

    The fighting was so ferocious the Japanese mistook a 6" Light Cruiser (the Perth) for a Battleship.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  160. Apple shut them down, the least of their probs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised Apple didn't pull the plug sooner; they are supposedly very strict about the .mac bandwith usage, and they have been such penny-pinching dicks lately.

    I am scared for these guys though. They need to slap "PARODY" all over this or evil Rick Berman and his battalion of bloodsucking lawyers will be all over them.

    Although, I can't tell if this is SUPPOSED to be a parody. The sets are perfect, right down to the hexagonal corridors that just happened to be in EVERY alien planet and ship... And the captain's shirt is just a little too short. And the acting... it reminds me of David Lynch (in Twin Peaks for example) in that sometime with him something awful would happen but he would make it so bizarre that you wanted to laugh, but you just weren't sure... With this it's like um, a giant clay Barney is attacking!? Okay, this is a joke, right? Right?

    I can't believe they didn't consult a lawyer at least once over the 7 years to see if they could stay out of trouble.

    Their fame with this may be their undoing. :-(

  161. Looking for trouble?? by keyslammer · · Score: 1
    hmmmm... come to think of it there have been a couple of funny looking guys in butterfly outfits hanging out near my house lately...

    Seriously, though, if being able to easily view quicktime movies in my browser was very important to me, I guess I would fork up the $25 for a registered crossover plugin. As it stands, this isn't something I care too much about.

    I have never considered the prospect of running anything other than a free UNIX on my desktop. Mac OS/X seems nice, but only runs on a Mac. Everytime I try to do anything Windows I am filled with disgust and amazement that millions of programmers are willing to use such a system.

  162. mirror, original url slashdotted. no suprise :) by Mark19960 · · Score: 1

    we are slashdot.
    resistance is futile.

  163. see WILLIAM SHATNER LENT ME HIS HAIRPIECE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can find it, it's over the internet is a few places, is Ken Hegan's short film (~ 15 minutes) called "William Shatner Lent me his Hairpiece". That's damned hilarious trek-inspired stuff.

  164. The fricken movies won't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm I'll believe it when I see it. I get a message saying that the plugin did not download. Whoever created these Star Trek imitation movies should put some MPGs on their site or something!

  165. perfect for bittorrent by jooon · · Score: 1

    The P2P program BitTorrent has survived slashdots before, this one should be no match :)

    Someone should setup a tracker, and make a torrent of the files. I will, if no one beats me to it, which I rather hope. Downloading from slow mirrors at 5KB/s here.

    1. Re:perfect for bittorrent by mxs · · Score: 1

      Hi there ...

      Since even the mirrors are swamped : Go fetch BitTorrent from http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/download.html (there are packages for Linux, Mac OS and Win32 avaiable, right next to the Python source), then click on this link :

      http://a.wirebrain.de/exeter/exeter.torrent

      BitTorrent is a peer to peer file swarming application. You upload the file you're downloading. This way, the more people there are, the faster you can get the episode. A couple of friends and me are seeding it.

      If your download starts out slow, please wait a couple of minutes. It should pick up, especially once you start uploading.

  166. For those who were impressed by this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you check out Star Trek: Hidden Frontier.

    Its set post-Voyager. They use virtual sets rather than real ones, but they *do* get their episodes out on a monthly basis, so the tradeoff is worth it. The acting wasn't great at the start, but its much improved in more recent episodes.

    1. Re:For those who were impressed by this... by mustangdavis · · Score: 2

      I went there ...

      All it said was "Panel Offline"

      Another /.'ed site????

    2. Re:For those who were impressed by this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite possibly. Try again in a few days.

  167. tradition by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2

    There's something profoundly in keeping with the Star Trek tradition to see the admiral using a teleprompter.

  168. That didn't take long, did it? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    From their homepage:

    Well, well ... 10,000 hits an hour were just a little beyond what Mac.Com was willing to tolerate. The movies have been taken offline until an alternative host can be found.

    If they didn't know what a slashdotting was before, they sure as hell know now. :-)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  169. Lets hope... by QangMartoq · · Score: 0

    That this ship's 5 year mission can last longer than 3 years ;)

  170. Not that good. by Icehouseman · · Score: 1

    Ya know, just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should do it. I loved how at the beginning of the episode the Captain is told he has a call on line one. When did Star Trek take on corporate speak? The captain should have just told him to give the guy his voice mail. There's also lots of other little points that annoyed me, but I won't go in to it now.

  171. Comic book guy by IlluminatedOne · · Score: 0

    worst - episode - ever

  172. All good things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    13KB/sec. Sigh.

  173. Mirror mirror...? by cowtamer · · Score: 2


    Could someone who managed to get the downloads _please_ post these files over a P2P network or something like Freenet and post the locations/filenames?

    For all the P2P talk on /. you'd think someone would have jumped on it by now...
    </whine>

    1. Re:Mirror mirror...? by mustangdavis · · Score: 2

      If anyone downloaded these files, let me know and I will put them on my OC-12 connection ....

      As Jar Jar would say: "Mesa gotsa lotsa bandwidth"

      Email me at adavis@coldfirestudios.com if you'd like me to post them.

  174. You just made me cry by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
    ... I wish I had mod points today, 'cause you'd get some for bringing up a good sci-fi series in the context of over-rated Star Trek TV gruel.

    I won't give up on Firefly yet, despite Fox being a bunch of asschimps for cancelling the show (I guess it is a little too high-brow for Fox, in retrospect)... rather than some fan flicks, I'd rather see fans put effort into saving the series by getting it onto another network like UPN.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    1. Re:You just made me cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had moderator points, as you are clearly off-topic.

    2. Re:You just made me cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was just too boring.

    3. Re:You just made me cry by Snaller · · Score: 2

      But more interesting that you

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  175. Cool, but unfortunate for the crew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as, if I recall correctly, Kirk and the Enterprise (1701) were lauded because of the twelve Constitution class ships launched on five year missions, Enterprise was the only one to make it back intact...

  176. She's coming... by irving47 · · Score: 1

    The REAL NEMESIS... her name is... Mallory Levitt. Paramount/Viacom's lawyer used to send out the cease and desist letters.
    Nothing in this post should be construed as waiver of my rights to be a smartass.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  177. irc chat by hfastedge · · Score: 1

    irc.freenode.net #bittorrent

    chat with the drones.

    --

    -- -- --

    Help my mini cause: My journal

  178. And it's gone by bigberk · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there must have been some pretty crazy bandwidth demands on mac.com. Even though I was able to download a couple of the files at full speed. If you're not sure whether you have a whole file, here are the md5sums for the first two:

    teaser.mov 40492ade77f93a23ae228da07ff4abb9
    actone.mov ad22bca48d596fb629bf8812a1d1dccb

    Will be on gnutella by tomorrow I'm sure.

  179. Try being a little less critical of these people by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    You're quite incorrect. Your opinion of the final product (or my opinion for that matter) doesn't mean anything. TRYING to do something good is hard. If they didn't succeed then fine. They attempted something ambitious and appear to have please a fair number of people with the outcome.

    I haven't seen it yet so I can't say a thing about the quality of their attempt but obviously from the part of the teaser I was able to download they put some hard work in it.

    You may have learned to be more discerning in your viewing habits in the past 30 years but you've learned very little about people or what matters to them

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  180. Score 5, Score 5, Score 5 & Score 1 (French ju by xigxag · · Score: 2

    It seems to me this subject has had a tremendous number of posts with scores of 4 and 5. Case in point, the parent and grandparent of this post are both scored as 5 even though they are repeats of other posts up-thread.

    Not that I'm complaining. But I'm wondering now if anybody has ever done a study of the /. topics that have the highest average scoring posts?

    I'm thinking this topic would certainly be in the top ten -- if for no other reason than that it is way too damned easy to hit a "5,Funny" by poking fun at what must be the nerdliest act of the past 25 years. I did know a guy in 1980 who was the president of the chess club in HS, a D&D dungeon master, had invented his own language a la Tolkien, and who wore thick black glasses held together with tape. And he never washed his hair. But yet I can't even imagine him parting with his collection of Tron cels to raise the cash to put together this project. Oliver Ardai, where are you?

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  181. the acting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the acting has to be about the worst ive ever seen

    1. Re:the acting by GreatBallsOfFire · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell. Also, how's your acting?

  182. That show... by MeatMan · · Score: 0

    just plain sucks. Nice set, awful terrible show. Not a single person could even come close to acting. I mean, it'd be worth it if it was at least entertainingly campy, it just plain sucks. I have to LmaO reading all these other posts of people desperately trying to get this crap on their computer by any and so many complicated means possible. Save yourself the effort and waste of time. After all the effort they put into the set and filming, they forgot to find actors!

  183. Am I the only one who thought of a scene... by serutan · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I think you probably are.

  184. Slow.... by Googa · · Score: 1

    I connect at 15KB/s. Doh! I'll wait a bit...

  185. Thanks ! by serutan · · Score: 2

    You are a demigod.

  186. Andorian Love by bfoozlover · · Score: 1

    I live in Minnesota and I've heard that this guy who plays the Andorian B'fuselek, caught his daughter born this summer... at home, without a midwife or anyone else present. Seems his wife had an hour long labor and gave birth in their master bedroom... he's now fondly called Doctor Josh by those he works with.

  187. Re:NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

    Random question: Was that the same Jefferies for whom the (in)famous Jefferies tubes are named?

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  188. Has anyone noticed... by neurojab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That this thing is actually quite bad? The dialogue is rushed, the acting horrible. I wanted to like it. Oh well.

    Here's what's got me wondering... They spent seven years tweaking every nuance of this. Why would someone do this? Why?

    They're actually trying to tell us something. We could spend our time consuming products we don't need... watching mindless drivel on TV, or we could "do something" by making a cheap knock-off of a cheap TV show from 30+ years ago. Millions of years from now, our society and culture will only be known through the continuing "Star Trek" parodies. For Auld Lang Syne!

    1. Re:Has anyone noticed... by Icehouseman · · Score: 1

      Our society also has "Friends" which seems like it will continue on for years and years; sadly.

  189. Don't forget the Reaction Marks: by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Bones! I! Have! Finally! Learned! Punctuation!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  190. "Chang" (of ST VI) is a character! by DonWallace · · Score: 1
    I just noticed this in the cast portion of the web site. Note the reference to the bolted-on eyepatch worn by Christopher Plummer's 'Chang':

    SUBJECT:Commander Chang (played by Nathan Wolf)
    AFFILIATION: Klingon Empire
    STATUS/POSITION:Commanding Officer of Prototype Klingon Battle Cruiser

    KNOWN HISTORY: Klingon Commander Chang commands the first Klingon battle cruiser equipped with a Romulan cloaking device. Klingon use of cloaking technology was confirmed during the U.S.S Exeter's encounter with Chang on Epsilon Indi IV. Chang initiated hand to hand combat with the Exeter's Captain Garrovick on the planet surface and, while defending himself, Garrovick inadvertently put out one of Chang's eyes. Since that encounter, Chang is reported to wear a patch over his injured eye.

    I wonder if this "taints" the production seriously from the standpoint of fair use? It would appear so.

  191. From the intro. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worlds Untouched by the Eyes of Man

    Maybe it was just me, but I thought that was the funniest line in the whole thing.

  192. Now a retro revival of Outer Limits, please by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    What a nice effort this Star Trek pastiche is -- charming for its dorky fidelity to the original, impressive for its bargain-basement technical achievement.

    In all television, there's little as enjoyable as series from the 1960s, superior in style, intelligence and wit to much if not all of what has followed. Watching the original Outer Limits as well as Danger Man/Secret Agent on DVD recently, I've been stunned by the level of quality. What happened to TV after, say, 1969? It's as if we were blasted from space by a giant Dumbness Ray.

  193. Thank you! by TechnoWitch · · Score: 1

    Thanks bunches, Fastlink. Mega props to ya.

    best,
    Technowitch

  194. Wow... by inertia187 · · Score: 0

    This was so well done that I expect 14 more every year for 7 years.

    Oh well.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  195. My Favorite Explanation by serutan · · Score: 2

    When the Klingons first ventured into space they immediately set about conquering every inhabited planet they encountered. Their overly ambitious expansion soon gave them an empire that was difficult for them to rule. As in the Roman Empire, the military forces on the frontier were highly autonomous, and what with the turmoil back home, many of the troops stationed faraway decided to settle down where they were, intermarry with locals and raise families.

    After several generations various hybrid Klingon races became common on the frontier, assuming positions of authority and building and crewing their own starships. The first Klingons the Federation encountered were mostly of this type.

    During the latter part of Kirk's career, the ruling clans undertook a vast campaign of racial cleansing, demoting or subjugating most of the hybrids. Those with distinguished service records (e.g. Kang) were allowed to take genetic therapy to remove "contaminants," which altered their appearance.

    This brief episode of racial impurity, particularly the fact that the hybrids were often superior to pure-blooded Klingons in many ways (better organizers, less psycho) is tremendously embarassing to most Klingons. Hence Worf's extremely tight-lipped reaction -- "We do not speak of it."

  196. starwreck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.starwreck.com/

  197. I can't believe... by Spunken · · Score: 1
    ...this hasn't been done before.

    I mean, we're talking about Trekkies here. Haven't they done everything already? I guess not.

    Of course, there are those (Italian? Spanish? Mexican?) remake of Star Trek, but that was an actual TV production. (A far worse in quality, as I understood.)

  198. pft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Star Trek geeks really need to get a fucking LIFE.

  199. Conversion to MPEG/divx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could someone please convert these to some VIEWABLE
    format such as MPEG or divx. I tried Mplayer,
    with no success. In principle the video might
    be handled by an ugly binary only driver,
    but I got just a segfault.

  200. divx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone bothered converting this to divx or mpeg? I probably could convert it if anyone wanted to host it or was even interested in it.

  201. download files here by jonathanbearak · · Score: 1

    as a linux user, i lack a quicktime plugin. the source code points to these files, however:

    http://www.flapdoodle.org/exeter/teaser.mov
    htt p://www.flapdoodle.org/exeter/actone.mov
    http://s tarshipexeter.pdox.net/exeter/acttwo.mov
    http://s tarshipexeter.pdox.net/exeter/actthree.mov
    http://www.flapdoodle.org/exeter/tag.mov

    or:
    http://www.flapdoodle.org/exeter/
    will list the files

    haven't played them yet, but in about 15 minutes it looks like i'll have the files. would have thought the thing slashdotted by now, and yet i've already got 30mb

  202. Ok it was a bad joke but by nlinecomputers · · Score: 2

    ...a Troll mod? That was kind of harsh.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  203. From the Official (1975 edition) Technical Manual by gigabitme · · Score: 1

    Not sure what their source was for that info, but if anyone _is_ interested in canon...

    The 1975 Ballantine, Franz Joseph edition (stardate 7511.01) Star Fleet Technical Manual lists four rounds of comissioning for the "Heavy Cruiser class", as follows:

    14 MK-IX class:
    - Constellation, NCC-1017 (class ship)
    - Republic, NCC-1371
    - Constitution, NCC-1700
    - Enterprise, NCC-1701
    - Farragut, NCC-1702
    - Lexington, NCC-1703
    - Yorktown, NCC-1704
    - Excalibur, NCC-1705
    - Exeter, NCC-1706
    - Hood, NCC-1707
    - Intrepid, NCC-1708
    - Valiant, NCC-1709
    - Kongo, NCC-1710
    - Potempkin, NCC-1711

    16 MK-IXa class:
    - Bonhomme Richard, NCC-1712 (class ship)
    - Monitor, NCC-1713
    - Hornet, NCC-1714
    - Merrimac, NCC-1715
    - Endeavor, NCC-1716
    - Defiance, NCC-1717
    - Excelsior, NCC-1718
    - Eagle, NCC-1719
    - LaFayette, NCC-1720
    - Wasp, NCC-1721
    - El Dorado, NCC-1722
    - Ari, NCC-1723
    - Saratoga, NCC-1724
    - Tori, NCC-1725
    - Krieger, NCC-1726
    - Essex, NCC-1727

    4 replacements for Constitution class ships lost in the line of duty:
    - Constellation II, NCC-1728
    - Farragut II, NCC-1729
    - Intrepid II, NCC-1730
    - Valiant II, NCC-1731

    111 MK-IXb class: hull numbers from NCC-1732 through NCC-1843
    - Achernar, NCC-1732 (class ship)
    - Tikopai, NCC-1800 (class ship)

    One thing that bugs me about all this is the murky issue of what "class" all of these are supposed to be called: heavy cruiser, Constitution, or what?

    The implication that I take from my source is as follows:
    - the MK-IX run of ships are "Constitution class Heavy Cruisers"
    - the MK-IXa run are "Bonhomme Richard class Heavy Cruisers"
    -the MK-IXb run numbered NCC-1732 - NCC-1799 are "Achernar class Heavy Cruisers"
    - the MK-IXb run numbered NCC-1800 - NCC-1843 are "Tikopai class Heavy Cruisers"

    ...but I've obviously already lost too much sleep over the whole question anyway...


    --
    If appearance and essence were the same thing, there would be no need for science -- Dr. Michio Kaku
  204. Judge it in context by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    If you have a zillion bucks to spend on production and post, you can increase the "quality" dramatically. If you have no budget, or are self-financing like these guys, you make do with what you can.

    That being said, I think they did a great job. I've gone the extent of getting a formal degree in Video Production, and I can testify that my first productions were horrible. This episode looks professional for a "first effort." Way to go guys!

  205. Major Media Exposure by bfoozlover · · Score: 1

    SO it must make the Star Tribune (a major Minneapolis newspaper) feel like complete idiots to have this creative genius sitting right under their noses, doing illustrations for them for FREE, and all they can say is "he works in our mailroom." Boy is somebody in trouble!!!! Set your phasers for moron blast.

  206. Wow, you really are a Nerd... by Pii · · Score: 2
    Minnesota has it's own football team. They're called the Vikings.

    The Green Bay Packers (the *real* America's Team / F*** You, Dallas!) are from Wisconsin.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  207. Nice start by GreatBallsOfFire · · Score: 0
    Not bad for a first shoot, and amazing for a little amateur indie production. Remember, these were all shot without the aid of a studio, sound lot, editing facility, etc. So, everyone who bitches and moans, all I have to say is Grow Up! You can acquire the right to criticize after you create something of equal or greater accomplishment.

    First, some praise.
    • Fidelity: The degree of fidelity to which this production adheres to the original TOS style is phenomenal.
    • Special effects: Any production that relies too heavily on special effects is a poor production. One of Paramount's greatest flaws in the current franchise production is the heavy use of special effects to make up for plot weakness. The minimal use of these effects here was perfect.
    • Technobabble: Thank you for not placing immense quantities of technobabble into the script. Lord knows how offensive it is to viewers who come from a scientific background. Whether or not you like TNG, at least they tended to have some basis in science. Their technobabble was at least partially based on (at the time) current scientific theories. By the way, Star Trek is not the only culprit. Back to the Future had the "flux capacitor" that was an oxymoron. In electromagnetic theory, "flux" is a magnetic property and a "capacitor" is an electrostatic device that stores electrostatic charge. Since magnetic and electric fields are orthogonal in every way, having a capacitor capable of storing magnetic flux instead of electric charge is the ultimate technobabble ever produced out of Hollywood.

    Now, for some constructive criticism
    • Dialogue: there were some slightly askew lines. For example, reference to the "medicine" should have been "serum" or "vaccine," as typically used on TOS. These convey a sense of more specialized drugs, as opposed to "medicine" that implies over the counter cough syrup.
    • PC: Like it or not, political correctness is important in any production. Specifically, the alpha and omega reference in the opening title voice over is clearly a reference to Christianity's Bible, and should be changed.
    • Cinematography: Take your camera off automatic exposure. The camera's reaction to change in lighting during panning is distracting. Scenes should also be more carefully designed, as camera angle and scene composition in many places looked like a home video. Zoom in a little more, with more scenes and points of view.
    • Sound: More foley work would have been beneficial. For example, crunching sounds when running through the woods, as well as sounds of leaves brushing away when a character emerges would have benefited the film. Also, consider boom mikes next time, as the dialogue had a hollow sound, probably due to the use of the built in camcorder microphone. This was especially true in the outdoor shots.
    • Music: Using the original score definitely added to the experience, but there's a hitch. My advice to the producers is: compose new music. You have been very careful to avoid all ties to the original franchise by not using "Star Trek" anywhere, not copying the original final frontier voice over, etc. However, I believe the music is copyrighted and owned by Paramount, and they may have legal basis to stop this production and any future production due to unauthorized use.
    Mind you, TOS production quality is poor by today's technology, and even a bit back then, so some of my criticisms may have been true of the TOS as well. However, I think you have something here. Great work and I hope to see more.


  208. Re:From the Official (1975 edition) Technical Manu by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    Here's the real question: Is the TRM considered canon? I know the U.S.S. Enterprise blueprints from the same era (which are extremely cool) are not.

    After that, we can settle the question of "Who is better, Kirk or Picard?"

    Then, "What is the one, true religion?"

    IDIC,

    Rick

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  209. MPEG-1 version now available... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

    here. If you can't handle QuickTime for whatever reason or you just want to burn a VCD that you can pop into your DVD player, you want this file.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  210. Proof in full color... Adorian-style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dad adoring his little angel: http://www.naturalbabyshop.com/dadadore.jpg His wife gave new meaning to the term speedy delivery, when she gave birth in their home after only an hour of labor and the midwife had not arrived yet, either. Josh did a great job assisting his wife and baby was born beautiful and healthy. Great Job, Daddy-oh!

  211. LOOK, PHOTOS - PROOF!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look for yourself, and you decide... http://www.naturalbabyshop.com/AGOODONE.JPG nice family, Josh.

  212. New Links for Non slashdoted Non embeded movies by katarn · · Score: 1

    Since the previous site got slashdoted they have moved the location of the movies. The links to the non embeded versions of the movies are now:

    http://www.flapdoodle.org/exeter/teaser.mov
    http://www.mit.edu/~pdox/exeter/actone.mov
    http://web.mit.edu/pdox/www/exeter/acttwo.mov
    http://web.mit.edu/pdox/www/exeter/actthree.mov
    http://www.flapdoodle.org/exeter/tag.mov

    Also note: the starshipexeter web site it's self appears to have a broken link for the embeded move for act 3. The URL I gave for act 3 worked for me at the time of this post.

  213. Thesis by LR_none · · Score: 1
    The sets, costumes and especially music in this show are spot-on. They recreate the ambiance of the original series beautifully. I actually got a thrill when the teaser opened up. It's amazing all this could be accomplished in an indie production, seven years or no. It's in part a testament to the level of enablement provided by digital video technology.

    However, IMO what Starship Exeter proves is that the true genius of the original Star Trek was in the writing. As great as the visuals and audio cues are in Exeter, the plot and dialog are dreadful. (Garrovick VO: "...the repairs to the damage caused by the Klingon attack is almost complete.") No amount of time or technology can invest the producers of a Star Trek knock-off with the creativity of a Heinlein or Ellison or Gerrold.

    What's curious to me is that the story takes itself so seriously. It would have been easy to make a few small changes and have a very clever satire. Instead, their treatment leads one to conclude that they believe their screenplay, like the sets, costumes and music, is true to the nature of the original. It's sad that their fine attention to the series' other creative elements didn't apply to the writing.

  214. Re:Score 5, Score 5, Score 5 & Score 1 (French by Randolpho · · Score: 2
    It seems to me this subject has had a tremendous number of posts with scores of 4 and 5. Case in point, the parent and grandparent of this post are both scored as 5 even though they are repeats of other posts up-thread.
    I swear to God, there weren't any posts like it when I started posting! I was just trying to be helpful.
    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  215. Re:NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

    Random question: Was that the same Jefferies for whom the (in)famous Jefferies tubes are named?

    It is indeed. Google has more.

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  216. Tech TV? by bfoozlover · · Score: 1

    Where did you find this on Tech TV? I want to see it too... Thanks!

  217. Easy answers by sbeitzel · · Score: 1

    Kirk wins on emotional grounds (he was first, he's the standard by which others are measured).

    Picard wins on merit, by acting like an actual captain.

    Result: two Oscars, one each.

    The one, true religion is emacs.

    The one, true editor is ed.

    --
    Oh, go on, check out my job.
  218. TAKING THE MIRROR DOWN by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

    My internet connection is getting hammered, causing my ping to jump up to around 800. Jesus. I would have liked some karma, sacrificing my connection like that. But no. No, no. Here I am sitting with no ability to play games over the internet, and only "Positive" karma.

    If you want the files, I'm taking them down in just over an hour, at 8PM EST.

    (if I remember to take them down, that is)

  219. More on derivative fan works... recommended by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    These Save Farscape people made an admirable effort to understand and describe the law on derivative works, specifically fan sites. Note that they point out ripoffs like "Ratscape" are also derivative works, odd as it seems.

    A nice plain-English effort, conscientious, and intelligently defensive of them. I can't vouch for every thing it says except for SAVE FARSCAPE damn it. :)

    One clear effect of the Web will be to really put fair use through its paces, and to determine new meanings within it.

    1. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [reads] Goes right along with my understanding of the issue, all right. To wit, derivative works belong to the venue owner, not the fanfic creator.

      There have been a few people, mainly SF *authors*, who have prohibited use of their venue for fan *art*, if not for fanfic. Of course it's still whack-a-mole, as even tho they can prevent public displays such as via web pages, they can't do a damn thing to stop people from creating derivative works and sharing them the old fashioned way, via [gasp] snailmail (or private email).

      There are a number of well-organised and highly-visible fanfic archives on the web, fanfiction.net for one. So far it seems that so long as they continue with no more than printed fanfic's traditionally-allowed infringement, no one gets upset about it. In fact, the only real hassles I've heard about have come from people who don't want the 'adult' material (not all of it slash) seen by minors.

      I've never seen Farscape. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Of course copyright violations can not be stopped (barring some sort of really nuclear DRM), but the rights holders don't have to be puritanical. They do need to do a reasonable amount of policing to protect the value of their property.

      Another doc I stumbled across on copyright and the internet was written by the DOJ IP division.

      I've never seen Farscape. :(

      It starts soon on the SciFi channel, the last (for now) 11 episodes. You can also rent seasons 1&2. A word of caution, it takes a little while to come up to speed; the show is not newbie friendly. You know, like gin. :)

    3. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Did you mean puritanical or draconian? :) Yeah, it makes sense to *reasonably* protect your copyrights... and to reasonably wink at 'em when there's nothing else you can do. I've had the thought that if [optimistic] anyone ever wanted to play in my universe [/optimistic] it'd be easier just to lay out the rules up front -- most fans are pretty good about it if they know what's allowed and the rules aren't too onerous.

      *blink* Rent?? wonder where would carry it that doesn't 1) need a subscription (I'm not a movie watcher, and a sub would be wasted; besides, the rural mail carrier is too blasted unreliable) or 2) make me immediately do the 40 mile r/t to return it to the nearest vid rental outfit (I only trek to town 2x-3x a month).

      And I'm a rum type myself :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Did you mean puritanical or draconian? :) Yeah, it makes sense to *reasonably* protect your copyrights... and to reasonably wink at 'em when there's nothing else you can do. I've had the thought that if [optimistic] anyone ever wanted to play in my universe [/optimistic] it'd be easier just to lay out the rules up front -- most fans are pretty good about it if they know what's allowed and the rules aren't too onerous.

      You know, your prose obviously mimics my previous posts, and as such is a derivative work under U.S. copyright law and the Berne Convention. I demand that you cease and desist all posting activity until you develop some original ideas. ;-) (let's hope no one trademarks the smiley)

      *blink* Rent?? wonder where would carry it that doesn't 1) need a subscription (I'm not a movie watcher, and a sub would be wasted; besides, the rural mail carrier is too blasted unreliable) or 2) make me immediately do the 40 mile r/t to return it to the nearest vid rental outfit (I only trek to town 2x-3x a month).

      Get Netflix bubba, sounds like you need it. Start here. You can cancel as soon as you're culturally literate.

      If you have a TV (that glowing box thing) the reruns are of course inevitable. I felt very silly after spending a couple of years fastidiously recording Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes, only to realize that the show was becoming terribly popular and that I would forever be swamped in reruns. And I still have those damn tapes.

      Seriously, Farscape is a fun show, but not the be-all and end-all. I don't like TV a whole lot, and this is one of the few shows in years I'll actually make time to catch, so of course they cancel it. I am intrigue dthat there might be even the slightest chance of fan pressure changing the verdict -- it would be a minor reverse of our feeling, as viewers, that we just don't matter except as consumer sheep.

      And Netflix is great for someone who like me never gets stuff back on time (I'd rather pay more than pay late fees) and has kids who insist Animated Whatever has to stay for a month. They have a Mr. Stingy 2-disk plan IIRC for $15/month.

      And I'm a rum type myself :)

      Rum is great -- for kids. ;-)

    5. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Tsk. Who's got the low userID number around here? Obviously you're trying to trademark something that has prior art. So lay off the unfair use, or better yet pay me a suitable inspiration fee ;)

      Trouble with Netflix -- I'd STILL have to make the jaunt to town, cuz the POBox is reliable and the rural box is not. Only progress there is the lack of deadline. Nah, I'll wait til it comes around on the cheapassed syndicated-only channel :)

      Only show I'm presently watching with dedication is Stargate, which only just became available on a channel I can get as of last summer. And we're a year behind at that.

      Oh, and gin is for sissies :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  220. Re:From the Official (1975 edition) Technical Manu by gigabitme · · Score: 1

    Hm. Good point.

    Come to think of it, the original question that prompted my post was "why did the Johnson's go with NCC-1706 for the Exeter's hull number?"

    The answer I came up with, based upon the 1975 SFTM, would seem to support the "true to form" label given to their efforts: the "period" reference materials listed Exeter as NCC-1706. Screw Paramount's decree of what's official and what isn't! ;-)

    It doesn't really help that my source material, as cool as it is, raises more questions than it answers, though...

    As for your other points of dogma, I've got to go with Kirk and the Old Religion. *8-)

    Slightly more seriously, on the Kirk/Picard question, that's actually a tough one for me. I'll go with Kirk most of the time, because a) people usually ask the "...better Captain..." question, and b) they also usually have difficulty separating the actors' portrayal from the characters.

    On point A, I think it would be difficult to say that Kirk the Captain was less than a tough, shrewd, and determined operator. Enterprise under his command was the only ship to complete its 5 year mission (ok, pulling from slightly post-TOS material here). And, for cryin' out loud, his first recorded mission resulted in new tactical study materials for Academy Cadets (The Corbomite Manuever). On the other hand, Picard was also very determined, and tough in his own way. But his way really was one of diplomacy and politics, as opposed to Kirk's sheer ballsy piracy (ala Captain Blood). And how many Enterprises has Picard lost!? In all the excitement I lost count...

    As far as B goes, I don't care how many Shakespearean stage productions Bill has done, he'll never be the actor that Patrick is. Here's a fun idea: try to imaging Patrick Stewart's rendition of Kirk, and Bill Shatner's Picard.



    --
    If appearance and essence were the same thing, there would be no need for science -- Dr. Michio Kaku
  221. Movie Poster by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    Thank Good for Photoshop. You can't have professional graphics without a lens flare!

  222. MOD PARENT UP by njdj · · Score: 2

    Valid point - can't anyone convert these files?

  223. Re:From the Official (1975 edition) Technical Manu by Cyno01 · · Score: 2
    how many Enterprises has Picard lost!?
    Yeah, and how many expedable ensigns did kirk lose? "On this away mission Ill be taking, Spock, Bones, and Ensign Jimmy. Now this is a dangerous mission and all of us might not make it back..."
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  224. Good? How about an MST3K Fan Tribute? by sgauss · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised at how positive the comments here are by those who viewed Exeter! The sets/props/uniforms were stunning reproductions of Classic Trek. The camera work and editing and much of the effects and sound work was professional quality, or near enough to match Classic Trek .

    OTOH, the story was mediocre at best, the acting was maybe fair, and one special effect in particular was horrendous! The witty banter at the end, ala Kirk, Spock and Bones was just plain bad!

    Honestly, I think someone needs to convert this to an MST3K tribute! Superimpose the robot head shadows on the bottom of the frame, and add some witty comments, and you might have something on a par with their treatment of the "Hands of Kronos".

    Spoiler Warning

    Just imagine Crow singing "I love you, you love me..." during the one horrendous effect.

    End Spoiler

  225. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The most advantageous, pre-eminent thing thou canst do is not to exhibit
    nor display thyself within the limits of our galaxy, but rather depart
    instantaneously whence thou even now standest and flee to yet another rotten
    planet in the universe, if thou canst have the good fortune to find one.
    -- Carlyle

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...

  226. It finally took until today! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    I found it about ten minutes before it was posted on Slashdot. Then the site practically went dead. All I saw up until then was the intro, but now I saw the full episode at its new site.

    Critique' follows:
    The acting is horrible and unconvincing. The staging and dialogue are incredibly weak. I mean this is not totally awful, but less than real television quality. But still, a good view for Star Trek fans. But you'll pick up a few dozen places, at least, which are really really really really awful.

    PS: The... er... "enemy"... can't seem to hit targets even at point-blank ranges. Gawd. This is horrible. Please pick me for the sequel. ;)