Slashdot Mirror


Building A (Serious) Home Network From Scratch

Casey Lang-Vie writes "THG are running an article that outlines how to build a home network from scratch. I wish I'd read this before I attempted - now I have a few (ok, 8) unsightly holes in my wall." This is the type of network that encourages home ownership rather than rental.

420 comments

  1. A drill, (When the wife is out) by ricosalomar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Worked for me.

    1. Re:A drill, (When the wife is out) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey -- keep your night-time activities to yourself... you might end up scaring away the average slashdotter with talk of this "wife" and drilling by yourself when she is away

    2. Re:A drill, (When the wife is out) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first time i read that, i read "and drilling yourself when she is away!"

      i *gotta* get out more.

    3. Re:A drill, (When the wife is out) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conduit is much easier. Pull cable whenever you feel like. Had it added when we built the house...

    4. Re:A drill, (When the wife is out) by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think that was the first THG article I have ever read that didn't have a graph comparing the performance of Quake 3 Arena over the different technologies being discussed.

      So here you go.

      Q3A on FiberOp .x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x
      Q3A on 100B--T .x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x
      Q3A on 802.11a .x.x.x.x
      Q3A on 10BaseT .x.x
      Q3A on 802.11b .x.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  2. building a? by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Building A (Serious) Home Network From Scratch

    Because lets face it, if you're not building a serious home network, then what are you building?

    1. Re:building a? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      How can they have an article about "ripping holes in your walls to deploy gigabit ethernet in the home" without a chapter on "convincing the wife" ? What combination of fighting, pleading, and nagging does Tom's Hardware reccomend ? Where are the benchmarks ? I demand to see a bar graph.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:building a? by rodgerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not that hard at all if you have your own businesses that run out of home. Laying in a proper home network to share Internet access and put all your stuff on a centralised fileserver looks a lot betyter than nasty cables snaking all over the floor.

    3. Re:building a? by Snoopy77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's all about the Point Management System (PMS). You endure awful movies, perform tasks around the house prior to being nagged to do it and do romantic thingys in order to score points. Points are rewarded depending on the level of commitment/endurance you demonstrated.

      For example, sitting through Titanic requires a high level of endurance and will score quite well. But if you are looking to earn enough points for a home network then you are going to have to attempt to sit through a Fried Green Tomatoes, Driving Miss Daisy Double. Even this won't get you close to earning enough points. Dishwashing, vacuuming and taking out the trash are good, but even better if you do it without being told. A romantic date to the movies is good, if dinner is thrown in even better. Dinner at Hooters is not good.

      And ofcourse, beware, points can be deducted. You must be on your best behavior. Unfortunately we cannot guarantee that any points will be retained for any period longer than a month.

      Good luck

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    4. Re:building a? by Bartmoss · · Score: 1, Funny

      They assume - probably rightly - that the average geek does not have a wife.

    5. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I do something wrong?

      I've no need to get approval from my Mrs, she just accepts it. I wire up the house? No problem.
      I buy a new PowerMac? No problem?
      I buy a 380BHP Supra? No problem?

      Am I lucky?

    6. Re:building a? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, I'd suggest you ask your woman to give your testicles back. They are probably in here purse next to the tissues and breath mints. Then put the women and children to bed and go looking for conduit.

      If my woman doesn't like my computer shrine (currently 2 laptops, three desktops, 500ft of BRIGHT RED cat-v, and a WAP) then she knows where the door is. I just hope it doesn't hit her in the ass on her way out.

      Seriously, the only thing keeping me from being ubergeek is my wife spending money on German Smoking Men, Italian dishes, and flannel sheets. Don't get me wrong, I love all those things, but when I say $Computer_Thing is needed in my house, money is allocated.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    7. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You want to know how to get double points for anything you ever want to do?

      Learn to give good head.

    8. Re:building a? by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      That's nothing! My wife moved my rack of computers and equipment and my computer desk for me when getting new carpet. She then moved it all back in and reconnected it all when they were done. Sweet.

    9. Re:building a? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's no way that shit worked afterwords...

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    10. Re:building a? by dpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess now I know that I'm in the process of putting in a *comical* home network.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    11. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Did I do something wrong? I've no need to get approval from my Mrs, she just accepts it. I wire up the house? No problem. I buy a new PowerMac? No problem? I buy a 380BHP Supra? No problem? Am I lucky?" no you're a liar heh

    12. Re:building a? by notbob · · Score: 0

      I've found if there's money that can be spent... a woman will spend it.

      It's amasing how much additional debt they can rack up for you in a short period of time, and I'm only engaged. But god help you, you're a bad person if you say no to be fiscally responsible to the silly stuff they want to waste money on constantly.

      Lifes a bitch... fun happens from friday @ 6pm to sunday @ midnight for all of us daily drudge workers who hate their working careers in computers. These times are of course excluding any outages or the constant insane deadlines the boss imposes, but beware trying to make up time late at night will get you in trouble for keeping her up, but even though you can't sleep going out in the middle of the night to hang out with some car buddies and go racing will get you in trouble and accused of cheating on her or other such madness.

      I'm engaged... still trying to figure it all out, one day I will... till then it's axing my finances for my projects.

    13. Re:building a? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I asked for my testicles back, but my fiancee gave me that look and asked why I needed them. But seriously folks, I don't think that it's my inability to stand up for myself, but the fact that my atrocious interpersonal skills can't justify the expenditure to her. (While she goes off to Old Navy and buys $100 of the same shirt because she needs clothes.)

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    14. Re:building a? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Better solution.

      Marry another computer geek.

      My wife and I met in college in CS262. We both love using, working on, and programming computers.

      What I don't get is why folks don't marry people they have a lot in common with and like doing things with.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    15. Re:building a? by kasparov · · Score: 1
      Dude, I lived that way for 5 years. Eventually, you will get to the point (no matter how nice of a guy you are), that you begin to resent all of this. You then start resenting her. Then you start despising her. One day it will all just snap and you will end it. Take my advice: if you want to have a chance at staying together (happily), make sure that you talk with her about the things that irritate you. Otherwise they just build up and take over any of the feelings that you might have had for her. Take it from a guy who is now divorced with all of that credit card debt that a spouse can accrue.

      On the bright side, I am now dating a very responsible, independent, attractive, and extremely intelligent geek-girl. It's good to be able to learn from one's own mistakes. It's better to learn from someone else's mistakes.

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    16. Re:building a? by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check your wife for a pulse.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    17. Re:building a? by cancrine · · Score: 1

      Ummm...maybe because there is no wife?

      --
      Links
    18. Re:building a? by notbob · · Score: 0

      How do you get past the thing of them taking everything you say emotionally??

      Thats my big stumbling block, I try to sit down to talk about serious problems and they get emotional, it's like WTF not talking about emotion, just talking about logical problems, ie how to reduce bills etc... or that I need more time to work on things during the week.

      I get complained at cause I'm driven on my work during the weeks and am not happy go lucky throughout the week, sorry but having a smile on my face when I go to work for 10 hours a day then come home and need to work, and then have cars and other fun projects that interest me pilling up is just not possible.

      I enjoy the weekends, weekdays suck ass like they're supposed to do, work hard 5 days a week and veg out hard for 2 days a week.

      Life's 30% sleeping, 10% eating, 10% in the bathroom, 80% working, thus you have to give 130% effort to survive.

    19. Re:building a? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      You are about to learn the origin of the random number generator : letting your wife balance the checkbook.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    20. Re:building a? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      My fiancee and I have a pretty good arrangement for all this. I work full time, she works part time. As a result, when we get the money in and the budget taken care of, the leftover money is split on a percentage between what I make and what she makes.

      It's a pretty fair agreement if both people work and compomises are made (I generally give her some of my share, provided I don't need new toys that month. =P)

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    21. Re:building a? by irontiki · · Score: 1

      Her purse is the first place to look when retrieving your balls.

      Computer stuff vs. clothing? It's not much of a comparison since computer hw and sw are directly relevant to our livelihoods and those expenses are very likely tax deductible for /.-ers. Our cpa wrote off two new computers based on the fact that my spouse and I both worked from home about 25% of the time last year.

    22. Re:building a? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need a different fiancee.
      Or maybe she needs a different fiancee.

      Seriously, if (for example) my fiancee didn't play Diablo II and such with me, I'd probably not be engaged to her. It's that simple--you'll have a much happier life if your fiancee shares several of your hobbies.

      As for taking everything emotionally, that's a problem. I suggest finding a counselor. Perhaps she has pre-existing emotional issues or something?

      Basically, if your method of talking about things causes her emotional stress, one or both of you needs to change the way you communicate.

      My final bit of advice is this:
      Weekdays are not "supposed to" suck ass. I work 8-10 hour days, 5 days a week, and love every blasted minute of it. Maybe a career change (to something either with fewer hours or something you enjoyed more) would benefit you in general and your love life in particular.

      Thanks, I've been Dr. Zeriel, your one-stop unsolicited-advice-from-slashdot stop. =P

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    23. Re:building a? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, that's fine, but then the bitch starts expecting it all the time, and you never get anything in return BUT points.

    24. Re:building a? by sn0wcrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It actually did. She labelled every cable except the power cables. Even got my dual monitor setup and kvm setup right.

    25. Re:building a? by notbob · · Score: 0

      I'm working on a career change, slowly, coding has been my career for a few years but I don't get satisfaction from it cause of lack of tactile feedback, I like to see / feel my work, not watch it get replaced every 6 months by the next stupid project that will go unused.

      So I'm working on switching into auto-repair, race cars, custom parts, fabrication, etc...

      I don't like my day jobs and I have to work at night on other projects to make enough cash to have anything at all for my projects, and then work on my projects. Coding numbs my brain soo bad it's not even funny, the lack of fresh air / sun light are detrimental to my health, only sun I get to see every day is on the way to and the way from work. No windows where my desk is, and since I don't smoke I don't get smoke breaks.

      We're getting better on our communication, slowly but surely, she doesn't like my business oriented side at all, cause when I get focused on something I hyper focus (adhd, etc...) and meds help make me focus even more but keep me way more balanced out which I like. It's let me work harder, I think a bit more of an increase and I'd be back to focusing very easily. My memory still sucks royal ass though.

      I like to just get things done and relax when it's time to, I've got a lot going on in my life and I've reduced down a lot on my activity level, she has a less active lifestyle, but we live together so we still get to see each other a lot, and I'm at home after work every day but sometimes have other things to work on at home.

      Thanks for all the advice.

    26. Re:building a? by topham · · Score: 1

      My rules

      Rule 1: What I earn is mine.
      Rule 2: What she earns is hers.
      Rule 3: Money spent on a relationship isn't a bad thing. I've paid for vacations where we had agreed to share the cost, and then never bothered to reconcile the money afterwards. Why? Why bother with the hassle. It wouldn't have been fun without her.
      Rules 4: She spends NONE of my money on stupid things. Thats my job.
      Rule 5: I pay for dinner out, I hate to cook. I'm not a fan of her cooking either. (raw steak isn't my thing :) [my problem= my money](in truth, we split it 80/20)

      If your other half doesn't make as much money, and my gf doesn't, then let her spend it on whatever she likes and you can cover the necessities.

      If it is on par, then split the costs and do it equitably. (60/40, 50/50 or whatever).

      If she makes significantly less than you, or basicly nothing, then you might want to figure out some form of allowance. Again, she can do whatever she wants with it. (I admit it, it would drive me nuts).

      None of the above implies you should not spend disposable income generously; on her and yourself. But don't let her back you in a corner if it's your money and you think it would be a waste.

      If the above is unworkable; your screwed, bail now.

    27. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life's 30% sleeping, 10% eating, 10% in the bathroom, 80% working, thus you have to give 130% effort to survive.

      You spend as much time in the bathroom as you do eating?

      Remind me to not come around for dinner...

    28. Re:building a? by notbob · · Score: 0

      I just like spoiling her too much, what can I say girls are super cute when they're happy :)

      Right now she's not making much of anything, and I'm cash strapped to within a few hundred of my bills and I got old CC debt that I'm still working on, so I need to work more which increases tension, but somebody has to pay the bills.

      I don't ask her for money, but if it's a couple bucks change I gave her or something and I need it for something right then, then I ask for it instead of going to get cash. I'm through all of my spending cash reserves :( Not a dime in backup there, I got my "Lose Job Reserve" but it's at just a hair over a month salary, which I want to increase over time.

      If it's cooking on the grill, thats my job or my roommates. She's a good cook though which is nice cause I don't like to cook, but I'm hungry when I get home from work so if she's not in the mood to cook I do like I do with every thing else in life I just get on with it and take care of it and make something to eat.

      Having an idiot roommate doesn't help things any either, long story of issues from that jackass to go around as well.

    29. Re:building a? by topham · · Score: 1

      Can I get extra points for finding a GF that is proud of the fact she has yet to see Titanic? (and, because of that, neither have I...)

    30. Re:building a? by topham · · Score: 1

      Secondary note.. all points are voided within 28 days...

    31. Re:building a? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      Well, I hope it works out for you, especially the career change.
      I count myself fortunate that I code in front of a picture window (being in the showy "ops center" instead of the server vault hath its privileges.)

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    32. Re:building a? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shit, *I* couldn't put the rats nest (3 PCs, Stereo, TV, VCR, DVD player, router, cable modem, power strips, lamps, kvm, etc.) behind my desk back together in less than a week.

      My wife won't even go in my office...

    33. Re:building a? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      X amount of time going in = X amount of time coming out.

    34. Re:building a? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Does she keep her German Smoking Men in the bed?
      That might explain everything...

    35. Re:building a? by sh00z · · Score: 1
      Because lets face it, if you're not building a serious home network, then what are you building?
      Why am I hearing this post in the voice of the Budweiser Real Men of Genius announcer?
    36. Re:building a? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      What, after she's had a kid?

      Her hole is so wide I'm afraid my head will fall in and I'll have to call the paramedics to pull me out. Besides wives aren't very interested in sex after the first few years of marriage.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    37. Re:building a? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Finding a female...in a computer programming class? Surely you're kidding. This must be one of those deals where the funeral director finds out 60 years later she's actually a man.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    38. Re:building a? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, as far as I can figure, she is definitely female. We've been married for nearly two years.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    39. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does she have a sister?

    40. Re:building a? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      My computer ballances my checkbook for me. Without being asked.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    41. Re:building a? by blowhole · · Score: 1

      But have you noticed that you've NEVER seen her and her 'brother' in the same room at the same time?

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    42. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is she into fisting?

    43. Re:building a? by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

      Funny??!?! That is not a joke, it is the truth is it not?

    44. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife is fucking somebody else.

    45. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What can I say? Being gay and not having to deal with any of this shit kicks ass!

    46. Re:building a? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, sounds like a cruddy relationship. My mileage seems to vary.

  3. Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

    I know I'm an ignorant lout here, but I'm missing on the discussion of why they went with Cat 6. It seams to me they were saying "We don't need it, it may or may not be any better, but it doesn't cost much less, so we'll go with it." Isn't paying slightly more money for something very over spec a worse use of financial resources than paying less forsomething that is slightly less over spec? Or did I miss something? It is late.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

    1. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something about gigabit ethernet

    2. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Ceyan · · Score: 1

      You can run GB over Cat 5e. It's more durable than Cat 6 as well, there is no reason to run Cat 6 over Cat 5e

    3. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. Category 6 FAQ
      2. Fat cat 6 cable pays off

      In other words, it's planning for the future. Sure, you can get decent runs of gigabit ethernet over cat5e tp but what about ten gig? The day will come when you'll want to use it, and if you own the house, you may actually live to see that day :)

      If it's a rental, you're just going to do a temporary install anyway. For example, I needed to run ethernet to a back bedroom, so I put holes in the ceiling in the bedroom and the living room (where the firewall, and the switch are) and just ran some cat5 up, through the attic, and back down. But if I actually lived here, I'd want to cut a hole in the wall, install a box, drop the cable down in the wall, and do a nice clean professional-looking install - And I'd want to plan for the future. In my case that would mean installing some smooth-sided conduit so I could poke some more cable through later, but if you end up having to rip out walls or something then I would definitely put in cat6 and seriously consider fiber. I'd also certainly install some coax and terminate it with BNCs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really don't know what happened to my cat6 faq link. It was at TIA. Oh well, try http://www.convergencecable.com/cat6faq.htm and http://www.kroneindopac.com/tech/cat6faq.asp and maybe also http://www.tiaonline.org/standards/category6/cat6_ for_search_engine.htm, the page I meant to link in the first place. I used preview this time, like a good boy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Cat 6 is more expensive than Cat5 initially. Installing Cat6 now is cheaper than installing Cat5 now and re-pulling Cat6 later if you need it. It's a matter of looking at the "big picture".

      By using Cat6 you are gambling that it will not be bypassed, and that Cat7 will not be required for the next big Ethernet speedup.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by DataPath · · Score: 1

      Well, he not only chose Cat6 over Cat5e, he also put in a 24 port switch, used two access points when he could have gotten by with one, he even considered the possibility in the future of converting the phone jacks to ethernet jacks. This guy was SERIOUSLY into future upgradeability.

      --
      Inconceivable!
    7. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by TrackDaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The replies to your question have all been very lucid and concise. However, none of them has come out and said what they really mean. Please allow me to drive the point home.

      Whenever you are doing a large capital project (and yes, when the money is coming out of my bank account, a home network is a large capital project) you sometimes spend more money up-front to save money in the long-run. Cable is cheap compared to labor and the other associated costs of installing it. So you pull a higher grade than you need. In fact, in larger installations, you sometimes pull more than you need as well. Then if you have a cable failure, between a couple of buildings for example, you simply abandon the old cable and energize one of the spares. As another poster pointed out, it's about seeing "the big picture". Hope this helps.

      --
      Run! There's a lobster loose!
    8. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by biglig2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is for example, not unknown when doing big copper wiring jobs in business to put dark fibre in at the same time, because it's the laying of the cables that is expensive, not the cable itself.

      Say it costs you $500 to lay the copper. If you lay fibre as well it comes out at say $600. If you don't lay fibre, and three years later realise you need it after all, then the final cost will be $1100.

      So you have a $100 bet with yourself that you will need fibre later. If you don't, you loose $100. If you do, you win $500. Now, considering how geeky you are to be thinking about this at all, what are the odds like?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    9. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cat 5e is more durable than cat 6? What, exactly, do you mean by this? In the long haul, a Cat 6 solution is cheaper. "'The benefits of category 6 vs. category 5e are eye-opening,' says Brian Celella, a lead electrical engineer for The Siemon Company and an active member of the TR-42 committee. 'For small additional investment, you can have a cabling infrastructure that will deliver significantly higher bandwidth and system performance. When weighed against the time end-users wait for processing or downloads - real productivity time - a category 6 system is actually less expensive than a category 5e system.'"

      I say run cat 6. Not only do you get more performance, but with all the interference generated in the home (office, school, anywhere), you'd benefit from the tighter twists in cat 6 as opposed to cat 5e.

      --
      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    10. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by onelin · · Score: 1

      IIRC, you should also be fine if you install Cat5E (note big E) which is perfectly capable of gigabit. I know The Cat5E my house got wired with is ready for gigabit...I've got the NIC now, just need the new switch.

    11. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Say it costs you $500 to lay the copper. If you lay fibre as well it comes out at say $600. If you don't lay fibre, and three years later realise you need it after all, then the final cost will be $1100.

      Well, except the difference is a LOT more than that. Have you priced out fiber lately?? $500 will get you a shitload of copper, but $100 would buy you one terminated fiber patch cord (6 feet perhaps). Taking in to account bulk fiber purchases you might get 50 feet of fiber for $100. I doubt it though. Add in termination costs (it's a lot more difficult than crimping or punching down copper connections) and you're going to be spending $1100 on fiber alone and $500 for copper. Considering you'll never need the fiber, why bother?

    12. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Ceyan · · Score: 1

      The Cat 6 cable itself is thinner than Cat 5 cable, which means if you aren't extra careful you could accidentally rip the jacket and puncture the copper trying to pull the cable through a tight spot, whereas Cat 5 might have survived.

    13. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      I lucked out when I bought my house. My brother owned the place before me and fully wired the place with CAT-5 to every room (4 drops) and (dark) fibre to the office, living room, and bedrooms. He installs cable for a small communications company, so he was able to get all of the supplies at cost or free. Everything is nicely terminated at a patch panel in the basement where I have my cable router and a 24-port 10-100 switch. I can basically plug in in any room in the house and have full connectivity. The best news of all is that my local utility has begun rolling out fibre to the curb service in my town! It really is a serious home network.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    14. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Why the coax, if not for television? I am curious because I bought a new house and it has two CatV drops and a coax drop in each room ... and I am wondering if there is anything fun I can do with the coax that doesn't involve the tv.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    15. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      Like so many things in this world: If you need to get into a tight spot, it's best to lube first.

      Check here.

    16. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Why the coax, if not for television?

      Pretty much just for television. A few switchboxes here and there and you could pipe a VCR signal around or something, too, I guess. Or, you could use it for 10base2 ethernet if you were doing some hobbyist kind of thing, I can't imagine why you'd bother.

      Coax is just interesting because it is inexpensive and fairly high-bandwidth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Latent+IT · · Score: 1

      Please define 'get more performance'. Gigabit runs over cat 5e, and cat 6. What will you get, super-duper gigabit? Until something new comes out, you'll get exactly the same performance over both.

      I was in best-buy some number of weekends ago, and saw a 10 foot patch cable for $24. It was 5e, but it was all 'special' for better performance from your DSL modem!

      Yes, it'll make that 1.5 megabit just *so much faster*. What thieves.

    18. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Just because it says that it is 100mbit does not mean that is the speed of the network. Real world testing will show probably something like 60mbit. Better quality cables can make that figure go higher. Switches and better ethernet adapters can make a difference as well.

      For Broadband internet, it is not going to make a difference at that low speed.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    19. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by rthille · · Score: 1

      Fiber is cheap. Terminated fiber is _very_ expensive. You can lay unterminated fiber, and then terminate it later, when you actually need the fiber.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    20. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 1

      Cat 6 cable minimizes cross talk (both near-end and far-end) over similarly-configured Cat 5e solutions, just to name one. I'd name more, but I think that the TIA Cat 6 FAQ has a pretty good overview.

      --
      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    21. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      Only if you want hook it up to an antenna for a Ham Radio. I wouldn't recomend it though, you'd do pretty good on receiving, but all the drops would make your transmitter loose power, you really want a single line for 2-way communications. You COULD set up internet over the coax, but it would be a pain in the arse, and would be slower than your cat5, so why bother?

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    22. Re:Cat 5e vrs. Cat 6 by Latent+IT · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      No, it won't make a difference. It just won't.

      Look, you're carrying digital information in, essentially, an analog way. Interference will cause minor changes in line voltage, but this still gets converted back to a more digital binary. If your cable run was so borderline that intereference would cause problems, ie outright changing ones to zeros, you'd *know*. You'd have so many problems, the line would be damn near unusable.

      Switches and better ethernet adapters can make a difference as well.

      Er, well, yes, as far as how long it takes your computer to deal with incoming packets. But that's not what we're talking about, is it?

      And, to the other guy that replied (save myself from having to post twice), did you *read* the FAQ you were so nice to link to? From the FAQ:

      The general difference between category 5e and category 6 is in the transmission performance, and extension of the available bandwidth from 100 MHz for category 5e to 200 MHz for category 6. This includes better insertion loss, near end crosstalk (NEXT), return loss, and equal level far end crosstalk (ELFEXT). These improvements provide a higher signal-to-noise ratio, allowing higher reliability for current applications and higher data rates for future applications.

      Yes, higher reliability for current applications. In other words, a two cables, running over a source of major interference, the cat 6 cable will have a better chance of working properly. However, if they work, they'll be the same. Nowhere in the FAQ does it even suggest higher rate for 100 megabit, or even gigabit. Why is that, do you think?

      As they say about reliability further in the FAQ:

      This means fewer re-transmissions of lost or corrupted data packets under certain conditions...

      Please note, under certain conditions. A properly run Cat 5e network will be just as fast as gigabit ethernet if properly run. As I said. Sigh.

  4. Better holes in the wall, than in the wallet by jkrise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As with emerging technologies, patents, copyirghts, proprietary protocols etc. have caused much misery in home networking. Why should home networking be any different from wirelesws corporate networks?

    Just 'cos powerful folks have pumped in dollars into the WiFi thing, doesn't mean we got to rush into this latest trendy thing.

    A simple UTP based LAN is more than sufficient for home needs.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Better holes in the wall, than in the wallet by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      but when my laptop is downstairs, and the router is upstairs, wires don't work to well.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    2. Re:Better holes in the wall, than in the wallet by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's holes in the floor then for you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Better holes in the wall, than in the wallet by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, it's when your laptop is downstairs and the router is in another building that wires begin to be a problem. Even then you can run 100mbps over cat5 for well more than 300 feet. Hell, I seem to recall it's more like 300 meters.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Too hard by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wall plates, contractors, planning -- feh. Do it the easy way: buy a $2.99 package of ethernet cable wall staples at Home Depot. Grab a hammer, and you can have cables routed all over your house within minutes.

    1. Re:Too hard by ricosalomar · · Score: 1

      Hell yes!

    2. Re:Too hard by poopdik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wall plates, contractors, planning -- feh. Do it the easy way: buy a $2.99 package of ethernet cable wall staples at Home Depot. Grab a hammer, and you can have cables routed all over your house within minutes.

      Staples? Then you'd need a staple gun. I'm perfectly happy just having spools of cables running free around the house, behind furniture.. over tables. I think they are happier that way too.

    3. Re:Too hard by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      That's what the cable guy did when he had to get the cable modem from the hallway to the living room (BTW a very stupid place to put a cable jack). Stapled it along the baseboard and over the doorway. Pretty clean job too. If it's good enough for him, then good enough for me.

    4. Re:Too hard by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      Yuk. Thanks, but I'd rather have a tidy, kid-proof through the walls installation.

      Moreover, it does a lot more for the resale value.

    5. Re:Too hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats my house!

    6. Re:Too hard by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      yeah but what does Jim Carrey know...

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    7. Re:Too hard by BitchHead · · Score: 1

      For installations where you need to run multiple cables and can't route them internally, those zip ties with the screw-mount ends work really well. I've used those on all my long cable runs in my house, since there's no way I can do internal routing on a plaster over brick wall.

    8. Re:Too hard by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Do it the easy way: buy a $2.99 package of ethernet cable wall staples at Home Depot. Grab a hammer, and you can have cables routed all over your house within minutes."

      Duct tape is your friend.

      Build a student network, which consists of ethernet cable duct-taped down to the carpets/floor, and it even goes under doors.

    9. Re:Too hard by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      I'm perfectly happy just having spools of cables running free around the house, behind furniture.. over tables. I think they are happier that way too.

      Of course they are! Cables carry information and "information wants to be free."

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    10. Re:Too hard by jhines · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just get the approriate color choices for the carpet.

    11. Re:Too hard by kaamos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the thing is, I kept expecting to hear "Coming up on TLC, how to expand your gigabit switch capabilities so that is can work at MML2"

      --
      In Canada, we don't fancy things like socks
    12. Re:Too hard by warpSpeed · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yuk. Thanks, but I'd rather have a tidy, kid-proof through the walls installation.

      Moreover, it does a lot more for the resale value.

      Thats the difference between the "mature" geeks and the young whipper snappers. :-) It is all about the resale value baby!

    13. Re:Too hard by CvD · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly happy just having spools of cables running free around the house, behind furniture.. over tables. I think they are happier that way too.

      That's what I have in my student apartment. Just cables running along the walls. It makes for easy adding of more cables too. :-) And you don't notice them after a while either...

      I guess if I ever move into a real home I will do it properly. :-)

      Cheers,

      Costyn.

    14. Re:Too hard by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly happy just having spools of cables running free around the house, behind furniture.. over tables. I think they are happier that way too.

      I usually string mine from one corner of the room to the center, and then out to the opposite corner. This lets me hang things like christmas lights (dim omnidirectional lighting is better for my eyes), plants, Christmas cards, decorations, and so on, with a minimum of effort. If you spend a little extra and use lengths of Belkin cable, you can even hang your home entertainment system from your ceiling, all without any loss in packets.

      The trick is getting nicely coloured cable. Get white or off-white lengths for the across-the-ceiling backbone, or paint your ethernet or fibre cables before you string them, and the wife/roommate/girlfriend won't complain (or notice).

      --Dan

    15. Re:Too hard by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Resale value only matters if you own the home. If you're renting,
      screw that: drape the cables over the curtainrods and duct tape them
      to the tops of the doorways.

      But yeah, my dream house, the house I would design myself and have
      built if I had infinite cash, would have networking in the walls.
      Fat conduit, actually, and easy-access junction boxes on the basement
      walls (or ceiling, if there's no basement wall there) directly below
      each wallplate, so that pulling new cable would be maximally easy --
      unscrew the faceplate, drop the cable to the junction box, then
      downstairs you pull the cover off the junction box and route the
      cable through the horizontal conduit to the next junction box over,
      repeat as necessary. And there'd be wallmount switches every hundred
      feet along the basement walls so you don't have to route cable too far.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    16. Re:Too hard by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      Resale value only matters if you own the home. If you're renting, screw that: drape the cables over the curtainrods and duct tape them to the tops of the doorways.

      Well, by definition, there is no resale if you rent. And on the otherhand, as a landlord, I prefer not to have duct tape no the walls, thank you very much :-0

  6. Re:Goatse Receiver, ass contortionist, dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, have some respect for the dead

    a treasured leader of slashdot has just pased away.

  7. Hey Ma! Don't forget the firewall! by cscx · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you're going to do a job, at least do it right.

    1. Re:Hey Ma! Don't forget the firewall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about firewalls, is there a recommended way of setting up a firewall, as in dsl->firewall->router/gateway vs. dsl->router/gateway->firewall? I'm still reading up on pf so it isn't in place yet, but does anyone have any suggestions?

    2. Re:Hey Ma! Don't forget the firewall! by cscx · · Score: 1

      Yes, dsl -> firewall. You don't need a router/gateway because it's part of pf. Unless you just have it act as a simple firewall and forward packets, but that'd be a stupid waste of resources. Just do a simple nat command in pf.conf, such as nat on $if from 192.168.1.0/24 to any -> $if and you've just got yourself a free, more secure router/gateway.

    3. Re:Hey Ma! Don't forget the firewall! by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      I know you think you're being clever, but there's no reason to use openbsd over, say, linux/iptables, which is arguably more powerful than pf, or at least it was last I looked, what with all the packet mangling shit that you get with it. (Sure you could extend pf, but you don't have to extend iptables/netfilter.) I like openbsd too but come on, show a little flexibility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Real men by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 5, Funny

    have 6 or 7 holes in every wall with in the house with blue wires hanging out of them.
    Wall plates? "We don need no steenkin wallplates!"

    Really now, why would anyone plan out a home network? That takes all the fun out ot it!
    I mean what's more fun than pulling wires at the last minute when you really have to have that wire.
    And then trying to untangle the whole thing when you have to trouble shoot it!

    Real men have huge tangled and matted nests of wires and they KNOW what every wire is!

    1. Re:Real men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't have any networking experience when i set my home network up (other than the basic 'plug one end into the ethernet card and the other end into the wall). I found a few webpages and got suggestions from people, and just went for it. It was an interesting and frustrating learning experience, but just as the parent poster said, I now have a semi-organized mesh of wires and arranged them to know what each wire is.

    2. Re:Real men by l810c · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've been retro-fitting our new(to us) house for the past year. A whole spool of RG6 and on my 3rd spool of Cat5e.

      Sad thing is I have over $200 worth of Quikport wall plates & cat5e, co-ax, phone, banana inserts sitting is a box. And yet I have holes in every wall with 2-6 cables sticking out.

      I keep thinking I'm going to get to the finish work, but when I have free time I keep thinking of new places to run cable. The Kitchen Desk, the kitchen counter, the porch, the garage. I'll have LCD's hangin over the toilets before I get those damn wallplates installed :)

    3. Re:Real men by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      I mean what's more fun than pulling wires at the last minute when you really have to have that wire.

      Heh, I like to pull live 230V wires. Just hook up one end, turn the juice on and try to keep up, adding switches and fixtures. It makes for some really, really careful wiring.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    4. Re:Real men by dmiller · · Score: 1

      You are obviously not married.

    5. Re:Real men by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not any more....

    6. Re:Real men by abolith · · Score: 1
      sounds like me :) only i did finish the job.....sort of. the bedrooms are wired(2 cat5e jacks each) and have nice looking plates, all routed to the retro-fitted garage/server room.....where it becomes an insane mess that I still have yet to figure out :p

      --
      if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    7. Re:Real men by xThinkx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Real men have huge tangled and matted nests of wires...

      Horseshit, REAL MEN mod the crap out of anything they can get a computer and/or accessory into, including the house, and they know how to run cable. Real men run the cable in an organized fashion with EL wire for cable management and UV reactive paint or insulation for added decoration.

      Some plexi and a 4' x 6' hole in the wall to reveal amazingly cool wiring job is a must. Top off with cold-cathodes (since you're in the wall you can run them directly from AC) and you're sure to have the coolest freakin wall decoration ever. Talk about increasing resale value! Any uber-geek or pothead would kill for the borg or trippy look respectively. If you really wanna go cool, mount your router in the window too, but only after you've replaced all the ugly yellow LEDs with blue ones and added UV-reactive fans instead of any factory ones.

      Mod the World!... Am I the only one who believes that any thing with a case can/should be modded?

      --
      Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
      "
    8. Re:Real men by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's really gay, man. I mean, fantabulously gay. Have you considered doing all the wiring for Trading Spaces?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Real men by babbage · · Score: 1

      Ya know, there are reasons that geeks stereotypically have a hard time attracting a mate... </hint> ;-)

  9. I don't read THG, by $carab · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As is detailed here and here, Toms Hardware recently performed a media blackout at a Public event, the Million Man Lan Party.

    They are currently threatening to sue an online journalist (who happens to be a poor college student) for libel regarding his reporting of this story. Fortunately, the friendly folks at Hardocp have stepped in to provide some legal assistance for the guy, to make sure he is not railroaded into pulling down his editorial describing THG's media shenanigans.

    Do your part for Internet Free Speech. Boycott Toms Hardware Guide.

    1. Re:I don't read THG, by Osty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do your part for Internet Free Speech. Boycott Toms Hardware Guide.

      And if you don't give a rat's ass about Internet Free Speech, boycott Tom's Hardware because they suck. Articles are spread across too many pages simply to create ad revenue, articles are poorly written and researched, the editors often seem to take a cue from Slashdot, and to top it all off THG is hardly impartial. If you want good hardware coverage, get it somewhere else.

    2. Re:I don't read THG, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There are already some nice, insightful replies to your post I thought I'd just add something a bit more emotional and visceral:

      Fuck Tom. Fuck his website. Fuck the worthless crotch monkeys that keep that piece of shit spewing more ads than content. Fuck them right up the ass without lubrication. I hope they get gang-raped by a bunch of aids-infected bikers. Fuck.

      I feel much better now, thank you.

    3. Re:I don't read THG, by User+956 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do your part for Internet Free Speech. Boycott Toms Hardware Guide.

      Boycott tom's hardware? Dude, have you seen the fascist bullshit going on at HardOCP regarding their doctored benchmarks?

      Kyle Bennett mass bans longtime users of his own forum for criticizing his faked benchmarks-- How can you believe a word out of his mouth?

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:I don't read THG, by mnemonic_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to mention the previous THG scandals. Vans, Q3test benchmarks, "nVIDIA approved testing" graphic, TNT2 vs. Voodoo 3 (THG refrained from reviewing the Voodoo5 btw)... The list goes on.

      THG is visited religiously and exclusively by many computer enthusiasts, though if they cared to venture out beyond THG they'd find out that Mr. Pabst's establishment is and has been very controversial, to say the least.

    5. Re:I don't read THG, by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Other, more reputable hardware sites:
      ExtremeTech (broke the story on nVIDIA 3dmark2k3 cheating, uses good benchmarking methods with the GameGauge)
      FiringSquad (good mainstream site, quicker more casual reading before getting into the really in-depth stuff)
      ArsTechnica (excellent for info on more fundamental aspects of hardware)

    6. Re:I don't read THG, by zeekiorage · · Score: 1

      Do your part for Internet Free Speech. Boycott Toms Hardware Guide.

      The author of the article seems to use "Internet Free Speech" really well, the article is *32* pages long.

      Intro: http://www17.tomshardware.com/network/20030630/ind ex.html
      First page: http://www17.tomshardware.com/network/20030630/hom e_network-01.html
      . . .
      Conclusion: http://www17.tomshardware.com/network/20030630/hom e_network-31.html

      I don't know about others but I don't have the money or time to be so serious (19-inch rack, etc.!!!) about my home network.
    7. Re:I don't read THG, by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "And if you don't give a rat's ass about Internet Free Speech, boycott Tom's Hardware because they suck"

      Toms Hardware? People who can give a great review to graphics card X without ever mentioning that it'll run at 8fps on linux because there aren't any drivers for it? A site supposedly run by computer enthusiasts, yet they're reccommending WindowsXP? C'mon, get a real computer.

      Perhaps I should split this paragraph over 8 pages with a 300x300 flashing advert on each. Now if only everyone could fit 100KiB of HTML on their 3-paragraph webpage (without graphics)...

      Besides, Dan's data is so much cooler.

    8. Re:I don't read THG, by MrDolby · · Score: 1

      Did you read THGs side of the story. The amdmb.com story is not true by the way.

      http://www.tomshardware.com/technews/20030701_11 16 21.html

    9. Re:I don't read THG, by Osty · · Score: 1

      FiringSquad? The site founded by Dennis "Thresh" Fong? The uber-Quake player whose only qualifications to create a hardware review site is that he's used a lot of the hardware in his game playing? I think I'd skip FiringSquad. ExtremeTech and ArsTechnica are good, though.

    10. Re:I don't read THG, by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      It may have been founded by Thresh, but it is not written nor maintained by him. He left the site a few years ago in fact. None of the site's content is from Thresh anymore (I don't think he even wrote reviews when he was around, I do remember a Half-Life deathmatch guide though).

      And in the computer world, I've found traditional qualifications to be often less than accurate when used to judge computer expertise (I've met kids in high schools who know more about hardware than college grad computer enthusiasts). Of course that is not always true, but neither is the opposite case. Which is my point; specs on paper don't always mean much.

    11. Re:I don't read THG, by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Toms is scum :) They offered me a "job" writing articles for their site. The offer was, *NO* pay, I couldn't keep any goodies, *AND* they couldn't ship the stuff to me, I had to pick it up.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  10. Cat5 Cabling Woes by borgasm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just a thought...

    Remember to follow spec when making your own network cables. Running the wires straight through will cause issues (signal interference). You must have pins 3 and 6 on the same twisted pair, otherwise, the cables won't work after 30 feet or so...

    If I had done it correctly, I could have saved 2 trips to the store, and lots of headaches.

    1. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Did you make your own wires or something?

      The wire comes from the manu the way it comes. There is no need to worry about twisting anything. The only thing you need to worry about whne running Cat 5 is that you follow the length specs, avoid going directly over flourescent lights, and try to cross electical lines at 90 degrees.

    2. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to when you crimp the connectors on. There are two standards you can use.

    3. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes by matrix0f8h · · Score: 1

      What are the symptoms of this?

      For example, I made up my own standard (putting the colors in alphabetical order for the RJ-45 ends) and now I get a link light but I cannot get assigned an address over DHCP. I will try the standard when I get home.

      Oh and the run is approx. 40 feet.

    4. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, many people use bulk wire and put their own ends on it. For one thing, you can get away with a 1/4" hole drilled on an angle between the baseboard and the carpet if you're just pushing wire through, and if you pull the wire out later you can't even see the hole.

      I run cat5 solid core and punch it down to baseboard outlets. Took me all of 45 minutes to run the 4 runs I need for our house including punching down the wires at both ends. Then use factory-built 6 footers between the equipment and the outlet.

    5. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes by wetshoe · · Score: 1
      Another important thing to remember is the floor surface. I noticed in some of the pictures that in the "lab" he chose to install carpet. This can be dangerous. Static charges love to build up in humans, especially in areas where there is thick carpet.

      If this were my "lab" I would have installed a tile floor. It might not be as pretty, but in the long run it might prove to be worth it. One would assume that he is taking apart machines and working on them. He has to be careful to ground himself, and keep himself grounded, even more so because of the carpet.

  11. 802.11g? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa dude. An 802.11 Airport Basestation is all it took for my house. No cable to pull, no holes to drill etc...etc...etc... Yeah, it's not gigabit, but I'm not pullin' multi-gigabit files through the house either. That's for the lab.

  12. Wireless... by craenor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Best solution for a home network. Because I'm sorry, if you need more then the 5-20mbps throughput you'll get from 802.11b/g network...then you don't need a home network. You need an office network, at home.

    Does wireless have it's drawbacks? Yes, but so do wired networks. I run 5 computers at home on a wireless network, sharing one internet connection through a Linksys Router.

    I don't run WEP, but secure my network by changing the default ip address of my router and disabling DHCP. So you have to know the correct subnet to use to get on my network and assign your own ip address.

    Perfect security solution? No, but it works for me and I have a great home network with file sharing, print sharing and net access, in a reasonably secure environment for under $200.00 on 5 computers.

    1. Re:Wireless... by Osty · · Score: 1

      I don't run WEP, but secure my network by changing the default ip address of my router and disabling DHCP. So you have to know the correct subnet to use to get on my network and assign your own ip address.

      Why don't you run WEP? Linksys's APs have pretty good implementations of WEP (well, their 802.11b hardware, anyway -- I tried their 802.11g AP earlier this year, and 128bit WEP was horribly broken). It's no less secure than what you have now, and at least if someone does get lucky and breaks your obscurity security, they'd still have to jump through one more hoop.


      If you just don't want to come up with a 128bit key, write a small script or app to generate a random key for you. Write it down, store it in a safe place, and bring it out when you need to add another WiFi device to the network.

    2. Re:Wireless... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is trivial to sniff your non-encrypted packets and determine the subnet you are using (or at least the IP address of your machines and gateway).

      Why not use WEP? It doesn't cost anything. Also turn on MAC filtering and turn off SSID broadcasts.

      Then you can claim to have a reasonably secure environment. (As far as consumer wireless stuff goes.)

    3. Re:Wireless... by craenor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are right...and as soon as I think one of my neighbors can/will do that, I'll upgrade my wireless network security.

      I regularly run net stumbler and the like to see if I can pick up other wireless networks. When I think I actually need better security I'll add it. For the time being though, there is nothing on any of my computers that really needs securing.

      As for why I don't use WEP? I've found it somewhat buggy and it sucks up bandwidth.

    4. Re:Wireless... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The choice to implement security AFTER there is a problem is a very poor choice IMO.

    5. Re:Wireless... by craenor · · Score: 1

      If I had something worth protecting, I would agree. But if someone sinister really wants to attack my computer while I'm in the middle of a mad game of scrabble with my Wife...then I'll fix whatever they broke and take the needed security precautions.

      And I'll really hope that whoever decided to do this is within range of my network...cause that will mean I'm in range of theirs. *evil grin*

    6. Re:Wireless... by Osty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I had something worth protecting, I would agree. But if someone sinister really wants to attack my computer while I'm in the middle of a mad game of scrabble with my Wife...then I'll fix whatever they broke and take the needed security precautions.

      Bad call, for two reasons. First, security is not just to protect your stuff worth protecting. Your network itself is a valuable resource to hackers. Second, you can't always just "fix whatever they broke", because you don't know what they left behind. That's why even "white hat" hackers are bad when they go breaking into other people's computers -- they really may not have done anything but added a text file saying "You have been hax0red, here's how and what to fix", but you don't know that's all they did.


      This lax attitude towards security is why there are so many DDoS networks out there built from the computers of ignorant cable and DSL users.

    7. Re:Wireless... by craenor · · Score: 1

      *shrugs* Maybe I need to buy into paranoia more. But you know what...debug, format and reinstall can fix most anything a hacker can do to my computer. If I handled sensitive finances, credit card info or other items worth protecting on my computers..then I would be more concerned.

      But as it is, people want me to spend more time trying to protect my computers then I would spend just doing an OS reinstall...that it probably needed anyway. No sir, not worth it.

    8. Re:Wireless... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But as it is, people want me to spend more time trying to protect my computers then I would spend just doing an OS reinstall...that it probably needed anyway. No sir, not worth it.

      It took me all of 2 minutes to enable WEP, enable MAC filtering, and turn off SSID broadcasts.

    9. Re:Wireless... by Osty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But as it is, people want me to spend more time trying to protect my computers then I would spend just doing an OS reinstall...that it probably needed anyway. No sir, not worth it.

      The way I figure it, you can spend two hours protecting your system, or you can spend two hours times N reinstalling. I'd rather take two hours up front, and have to reinstall less often because of security breaches.

    10. Re:Wireless... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      I've thought about wireless. Properly securing it is as much of a pain in the arse as running cable. And the performance does indeed suck - personally, I like to be able to store all my Canon G3 images on a file server and open them over the network. Centralised datastore with decent backup - I don't consider that an "office network", I consider it what people ought to have and don't.

    11. Re:Wireless... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Instead of worrying about WEP or not you should deny all non-VPN packets, run the WAP into a router, and use some sort of VPN between clients and router. That will slow things down too, probably more than WEP, but at least it's likely to be somewhat secure. You can just use ssh tunneling, or there are numerous other options.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could easy be done using airsnort. Ip adresses and mac adresses could be spoofed.

      recommend using of tunneling through ssh or ipsec based on at least 1024 bits RSA type certificates combined with a internal firewall for blocking all other ports.

      Wep is insecure and can be creaced using a bit effort.

      The encrypted tunnel is needed, so nobody knows what you are doing.
      blocking all other ports is needed, to prevent others to USE you're network for their own purposes

    13. Re:Wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It took me all of 2 minutes to enable WEP
      That's interesting, that's about how long it took me to crack it ;)

      WEP is not a quality encryption standard.
    14. Re:Wireless... by krel · · Score: 1

      If you just don't want to come up with a 128bit key, write a small script or app to generate a random key for you

      Jeez oh man! Coming up 128 random bits is so flipping complicated! It drives me out of my mind, i can't sleep, i can't eat, i don't know what to do! But reading your comment has given me the courage i need to 'write a small script or app' to come up with one right on the spot! It's such a simple and elegant solution, much easier than throwing dice or flipping a coin 128 times. Perhaps i'll go spend the effort to write a shell script, or C app right now. I had considered mashing the keys with my palm, or just closing my eyes and typing randomly with one finger, but your amazing hassle-free solution is just what i need. Thank you!
      Moderate me troll, but come on, if the above comment isn't karma-whoring, i don't know what is. WEP is insecure, and more of a hassle if your network isn't in danger of being compromised.

      --
      karma: ouch!
    15. Re:Wireless... by pla · · Score: 1

      Because I'm sorry, if you need more then the 5-20mbps throughput you'll get from 802.11b/g network...then you don't need a home network. You need an office network, at home.

      I agree, many people could do just fine with 802.11g. Just because we "need" 100 megabit (or better) doesn't necessarily mean we need an office network at home.

      Personally, I run everything 100btx, and have seriously considered upgrading my switches and a machine or two to allow a gigabit drop to (at least) my file server.

      Why? Not because I "need" it, but rather, because it doesn't cost much more than a far lower lever of performance (in the case of wireless, it actually costs more). The only factor keeping me from going to pure gigabit invovles the cost of decent switches (and I currently use two 8-port)

      But why should I waste a full minute transferring a CD image from my fileserver, when I could have it in six second? Hell, why should I copy it locally at all, when I could simply mount it remotely without an unreasonably penalty to performance?

      So yes, a home LAN has perfectly valid reasons to use wired connects. Speed, price (for 100btx, currrently all parts involved come dirt-cheap), reliability, security (perhaps the most important... Those folks who would get by just fine on an 802.11g link most likely would not have any clue what they need to do to improve their LAN's security). Why would anyone choosing to give up some (or all) of those for the sake of an hour's work running wires?


      Incidentally, run WEP. The highest level you have available. The method you describe of "securing" your wireless LAN would take around 30 seconds of passive snooping to find the right subnet.

    16. Re:Wireless... by the_quark · · Score: 1

      Yup, this is what I do, too. Treat the wireless network as though it's the Internet. I even use CIPE to connect untrusted protocols (SMB) on my wired network, because I don't trust my wireless network.

      The great thing about this is you can leave your wireless network open enough that friends can easily come over and use your network without needing a WEP key. Ideally, if you route the wireless network over a different NATted network, you can easily block off individual sources if anyone tries to abuse it.

    17. Re:Wireless... by McAddress · · Score: 1

      Wireless is inherently insecure. Even 128 bit wep is crackable by script kiddies with the correct w4r3z . MAC filtering is not that secure, If you are able to steal the MAC that it is broadcasting to, you are able to change the software portion of your MAC address to reflect that.
      I have found that the best security is not to keep any real valuable info on computers hooked to a wireless network, and use a personal firewall on each machine as well.

    18. Re:Wireless... by entrigant · · Score: 1

      You are right...and as soon as I think one of my neighbors can/will do that, I'll upgrade my wireless network security.

      Can you say war driving? I'd be on your network in no time, and god knows what kinds of goodies I could find. If you run windows on any of your computers you'd be amazed at the sheer amount of fun stuff it keeps records of without your knowledge.

    19. Re:Wireless... by chrestomanci · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If I had something worth protecting, I would agree. But if someone sinister really wants to attack my computer while I'm in the middle of a mad game of scrabble with my Wife...then I'll fix whatever they broke and take the needed security precautions.

      Bad idea! If someone hacks your network and used your connection, then you could get into serous trouble

      About a month ago, My next door neighbour was convicted of downloading child porn from the internet. When people in my neighbourhood read about it in the newspapers, they broke all his windows, wrote graffiti, and hounded him away.

      Had I been running a wireless network, he could have easily leeched my internet connection to download the filth. Then the cops would have come knocking on my door. Even if I had been able to convince them that it was someone else, there would still be a nasty air of suspicion, from my other neighbours. Mud sticks.

      After that incident, I would advise anyone thinking of setting up a wireless network to secure it well, and if they grant access to any third party, they should log EVERYTHING, as they may need those logs to defend themselves.

      Likewise, an open network could be used to send spam, or hack attacks, but that is less likely to cause criminal charges back in the real world.

    20. Re:Wireless... by jmozes · · Score: 1

      No WEP? Give me your home address and I am on your network within 2 minutes. Not running WEP you are exposing your whole home network to be hacked. Its childs play sniffing wireless networks. Good idea, on creating wireless, who needs wired gigabit network. Not unless you are doing some heavy duty file transfers.

    21. Re:Wireless... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But as it is, people want me to spend more time trying to protect my computers then I would spend just doing an OS reinstall...that it probably needed anyway. No sir, not worth it.

      People like you should not be allowed to connect to the Internet. The Internet is about cooperation, and laziness is not acceptable. You're selfish if all you think about is your network. Consider what someone could do if they gained illegal access to your network and used it to attack other people? OK, if that doesn't convince you then consider your neighbors browsing child porn through your WAP gateway and trying to explain to your dumb hick cops that you're not the one doing it when they come bust down your door.

    22. Re:Wireless... by gr0nd · · Score: 1
      From the article...
      If you cast aside the potential issues with the variations of wireless and just compare the line speed, 54 Mbit (which is offered by the best wireless) cannot hold a candle to the 100-Mbit speed offered by Ethernet. If you compare this to the more widely available 11-Mbit 802.11b products, 11 Mbit many not even seem practical in terms of performance.
      Raise your hand if you have more than an 11Mbps pipe to the Internet (at your house). Hmmm, I thought so. About the only thing 11Mbps is not practical for is backups.
    23. Re:Wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Just two machines and the transfering of .dv files kills wireless as a usable solution.

    24. Re:Wireless... by autocracy · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not the guy on Court Street in Auburn... I think he believes that, but I'm the reason that he's wrong. If you're in an area with any amount of population, you risk being war drived(??). Now, I'm not wreckless, and I doubt most people are... but I am mischievous...

      --
      SIG: HUP
    25. Re:Wireless... by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      You won't be saying that when the RIAA kick in your doors at gunpoint with a SWAT team because you are accused of serving up copyrighted material on Kazaa.

      But it wasn't me, it must have been my neigbors....

    26. Re:Wireless... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree, but it's still better to enable it than NOT enable it. And it should be used with other security methods like MAC filtering and disabling SSID broadcasts. Using all three is your best bet for consumer gear. If you want real security you can go with Cisco equipment, but who has the $$$ for that at home?

    27. Re:Wireless... by kcurrie · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't run WEP, but secure my network by changing the default ip address of my router and disabling DHCP. So you have to know the correct subnet to use to get on my network and assign your own ip address.

      You're not "securing" your network by changing the address and disabling DHCP. You're making an attacker take an additional few seconds before jumping on your network. Sniffing your network for a few minutes will reveal what address range should be used.

      A better solution:

      1) disable SSID broadcasting. Note that this is simply a "good" thing to do-- SSIDs can still be sniffed in normal traffic.
      2) Use MAC filtering-- i.e. set your access point to only allow the mac addresses for the cards you have. This helps, but does *not* prevent others from stealing your mac for acccess.
      3) Use the lame WEP
      4) Use a VPN. Have your wireless in your DMZ (behind a firewall) and in front of another one. Have the internal firewall allow though the port(s) required for for your laptops to authenticate to your internal VPN server.
      You can use IPSEC, CIPE, OpenVPN, vtun, or even PPP over SSH (not recommended). I personally like OpenVPN, although there is no Windows client at the moment (there is for IPSEC and CIPE though).

      Configure your externally facing firewall to NOT
      allow packets out from your wireless-- instead those packets need to come from your VPN server.
      If somebody gets access to your wireless network they then cannot access the internet nor can they access your home network.

      Running something like arpwatch looking for new MAC addresses is a nice thing as well, but if you're using mac address filtering it should be impossible for any other mac to authenticate on your network anyway.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
    28. Re:Wireless... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Your neighbor isn't going to let on that he is horning in on your WiFi network, using your cablemodem connection on one of his laptops while using his cablemodem connection on a different machine to effectively double his bandwidth, nor is he going to mention that he has been browsing through all your shares.

      At least I didn't. But I am.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    29. Re:Wireless... by jridley · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why I want wireless. Running the cables in my house was very, very fast (less than an hour to do the 4 runs), I don't have any machines that move around.

      It cost me $20 for the two NICs (the other two machines had built-in NICs), and the wire was free (spool end retrieved from a dumpster). Wireless would have cost me a couple hundred more, at least, and the only difference would be that I'd get to spend 2 hours installing and configuring wireless stuff instead of about the same time running cables and installing a couple of NICs.

      100 Mbps is OK but I'd like faster. Try burning CDs through the network off a server; I have to limit to 16x burn. Even 802.11g would mean I'd have to go back to 8x burn, and I'm not going there! As soon as gigabit switches get cheap, I'm there.

      I guess wireless is fine if you're in a rented house/apartment and don't want to drill holes. Other than using my laptop on the deck, I'm not sure what I'd gain, and I know I'd loose some speed that I really need.

    30. Re:Wireless... by chris234 · · Score: 1

      WEP is useful, at least to keep the rifraf out. I'd suggest at least sticking to secure protocols over it, cleartext passwords should be a thing of the past.

      I don't bother with MAC filtering or hiding the SSID, neither prevents packet sniffing, and if a person really wants to associate with your wireless network, sniffing for a valid MAC address or for the SSID (it's still available in the clear in probe response packets in a "closed" network) is far more trivial than collecting enough traffic to break WEP.

    31. Re:Wireless... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Ah, good old-fashioned security through obscurity. And it's even given the immortal tag of "well, it works for me".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    32. Re:Wireless... by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      My GF and I frequently (ie, a couple times a week) move .mp3s back and forth between our file server and our two laptops. I've found it's definitely worth walking into the other room and plugging in a 100Mb/s cable rather than wait for it to be done over wireless at 11Mb/s.

      Mmm, I can't wait to get gigabit ethernet.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    33. Re:Wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my neighbor doesn't run WEP on his AP... all I have to do is click on the newly "discovered" network and I'm in... WAY less then 2 mins...

      I watched all his network traffic, found the name of a bunch of PCs and send him 'net send' messages telling him to enable WEP...

      Met him outside a few weeks later, asked him why he still wasn't using WEP and he didn't seem to know what I was talking about... I told him about how I 'accidentally' found his network, and decided to send him the messages... after a few seconds with a puzzed look he said "oh those! I thought my printer was out of paper, and just clicked through them".

      I explained the dangers, and how easy it would be for him to enable WEP on his Linksys...

      His response: "I only use it for checking email anyway, so I don't care if someone else uses it"

      Despite me lecturing him for 5 mins about hacking and ddos attacks and kiddie pr0n, he still thought the only issue w/ allowing anyone to use the network was him not having enough bandwidth when he wanted it.

      This is what happens when thousands of mindless users are all able to shell out $100 for a wireless AP and $40/mo for a "T1" speed cable modem.

    34. Re:Wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left my access point wide open and default to make it easier to get in. It's carefully firewalled (FreeBSD firewall) and a nice little honeypot. I keep waiting like a spider, but nobody's come by yet. We live in the boonies. Lonesome out here...

  13. Crazy. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0, Troll
    You must be nuts. It's right there on their home page:

    ...remote hole in the default install...

    I'll stick with my Windows XP that you very much. Easy and safe and I don't need to bother with an@33 9&*$# oWned by war3z_cr3W w0Ot!

    1. Re:Crazy. by enigma48 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the front page of openbsd states:

      "Only one remote hole in the default install, in more than 7 years!"

      OpenBSD is one of the most trusted OSes of our generation. You've got REAL guts if you can say that about Windows v.anything. (Not bashing windows - it just has some common issues with security)

    2. Re:Crazy. by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1

      The default install of Windows version 3.1 doesn't have any remote holes either. No network support out of the box. :)

      Seriously, I should try OpenBSD some time. But right now I am in love with iptables and don't want to break up with it.

    3. Re:Crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iptables is like the psycho girlfriend that you just can't understand... openbsd's pf is more like that new 23 year old hot blonde who just got the desk next to yours... and she "understands" you

    4. Re:Crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will dump that horrid bitch shortly after your first date with pf.

    5. Re:Crazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Win 2003 takes a page from OpenBSD's book and ships with everything turned off in the default install. Pretty soon, MS will be making a similar claim.

    6. Re:Crazy. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      As my dry, sarcastic humor sometimes falls victim to moderators who can't laugh, I just wanted to tell you that I WAS JOKING. Some people don't get it I guess. Sheeesh.

      Running BSD in a way right now on my OSX boxen. Luv it. :) Anyway, that's all. Later.

  14. ...wishful thinking... by warriorpostman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Great article...but as it says in the header this is the kind of knowledge that's good for people who own their home rather than rent. I don't have the option to drill holes in the wall and install CAT-5 outlets. And it's not currently in my budget to convert all the existing hosts on my home (read play) network to wireless.

    I'd like to see an article about the unique ways in which geeks acquire used hardware...the kind of stories where people who don't understand why on earth some computer savvy individual could possibly want their old PII desk top system which is slowly grinding to a halt under the cross of Win 98!

    Ultimately, most of my struggles with slowly building and upgrading my home network have been software related. Looking forward to 10 years from now when I can afford a house and will have the luxury to hide the CAT-5 (or most likely go wireless) in the walls instead of having to run them along the baseboard of our hallways!

  15. Wireless network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to set up a wireless network, but I don't want to cut holes in the air. I heard it will lower the resale value of my home.

  16. He hired a Contractor! by dokebi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's the point of putting an article together if you just hire some guys to do it for you? Is choosing the cable type and faceplate style that big of a deal? That's like saying "I wrote this article about building a computer from scratch, and we just asked Dell to do it for us. Oh, btw, I asked them to use grey face plates instead of the black one."

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    1. Re:He hired a Contractor! by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      In some (many ?) places you _have_ to hire a contractor, because unless you're qualified it's illegal to lay the cables yourself.

    2. Re:He hired a Contractor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      if that's what contractors do i could be a contractor too!

    3. Re:He hired a Contractor! by warriorpostman · · Score: 1

      While I imagine you're right about the qualifications and the illegality...one has to wonder how much of a strict qualification/certification process is necessary to the skill of drilling holes, installing face plates and laying CAT-5 cable...it's not like you can electrocute yourself with CAT-5.

    4. Re:He hired a Contractor! by colk99 · · Score: 1

      Unless your running telephone signals through it telephone is 60 volts normally and 110 when ringing at least in the US

    5. Re:He hired a Contractor! by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's not hard. But consider this.

      You have cables running hidden in the walls of your house, cables that CAN catch on fire. Are they the right kind, that won't burn up and toxically kill your family in a fire? What if some bunk gear sets them on fire?
      Are they too close to power lines? What are the code regulations regarding this?
      Are they installed in the right places?

      Sure, it's not nearly as important as installing power or other utilities... and I would bet you don't need a contractor to put in cat5... it's not a utility... but there ARE reasons to have someone professional do it.. especially for resale of your house. Or insurance.. what if your house burns down due to some electrical problem, and there was amateur wiring installed? Who's fault is that? You can bet the insurance company wil leverage it.

    6. Re:He hired a Contractor! by Leebert · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > What's the point of putting an article together if you just hire some guys to do it for you?

      I have a side business where we do a lot of network cabling. We avoid residential, and basically refuse to do it except for a few cases where we are asked by a contractor who gives us a lot of commercial work. Hiring a contractor for something like this isn't all that bad of an idea. The main reason why I say this is because good contractors have a huge array of tools to do the job correctly. And they know how to use them.

      Running network cable in a commercial environment is usually trivial. Running network cable in a home is always a hassle, and you had better know what you are doing. You also had better know how to fix a problem when you create it.

      If you get queezy thinking about sawing holes in drywall and then patching it up (not just sloppily -- correctly so it looks like there was never a hole there), then yes, you should hire a contractor.

      But be very careful, since most good contractors won't do residential. Homeowners whine a lot, don't want to pay much, and expect too much.

      As far as this article, I don't really see the point, either.

    7. Re:He hired a Contractor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homeowners whine a lot, don't want to pay much, and expect too much.

      Unlike idiot amature sysadmins who will let you lay a bus across an industrial air conditioner and not make a peep.

      If I could find that guy who was here before me...

    8. Re:He hired a Contractor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the f*ck modded this shait as insightful???

      It's crap! once your wiring is in place it will NOT catch fire spontaneously... and any equipment that catches fire is seriously defective and would have caught fire anyway!

      the only time you have any danger is during installation, potentially drilling through a wire or something of the like... but you still won't catch fire... why? because even a 20A breaker will trip WAAAAY before the wiring hits a temperature where it will combust... that's one of the main reasons breakers are there... to prevent the wiring from overloading and combusting.

      Also... just about everything else in a modern home will give off some fumes when burning, including the hundreds/thousands of feet of romex ("power") wire in your walls... some cat5 will not tip the scales...

      So basically there is almost nothing you can do during the course of a "normal" home network installation that will endanger your life... you might cause massive property damage by drilling into a water pipe or something, but that's why you should use at least a little bit of common sense while working (i.e. if it takes more then 15 seconds to drill thru the drywall you're hitting something so stop drilling!)

    9. Re:He hired a Contractor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now this is insightful...

      I worked for 3 years while in college as an electrician/network install guy for a local electrician...

      You have hit the nail on the head (so to speak) when it comes to homeowners... they always want it done so that it looks like it wasn't done, which is virtually impossible when you're attempting to run a cable through hundreds of feet of finished wall space in >80% of the homes out there. And they never want to pay enough.

      We installed 6 network drops for a customer, went out and bought the 8-port switch that they requested, had everything setup and working perfectly... it was tough to get it all done, but when we were finished everything looked as thought it had been installed when the house was put up and we even worked at odd hours to accomodate the home owner.

      We billed for 9 hours, the job actually took 2 of us 7 hours (keep in mind that this was 6 seperate drops and they had a finished basement)... our rate is $50/hr so it was $450 + $215 in equipment (which was the actual cost from best buy, we didn't mark up) and the homeowner went ballistic at the $665 price tag and refused to pay anything.

      Since it's typically not worth the hassle of small claims court, particularly for sub-$1000 jobs, after the 3rd notice we dropped action... we normally sent dead beats to a collection agency after 1 year of non-payment.

      About 8 months later this idiot actually has the nerve to call us up and ask us to come out and fix his router because he tried to upgrade the firmware and now it doesn't work. He even threatened to take us to court (keep in mind he hasn't paid a dime) if we don't fix it.

      The owner of our company told the guy he would personally go over and take care of the problem... he took care of it... walked into the guy's basement, took all the equipment (switch + router) back and cut all the cat5 off at the wall... told the guy to go f*ck himself and then walked out.

      Moral: If you screw someone, don't call them back into your house unless you right the first wrong.

    10. Re:He hired a Contractor! by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      But that's not the point. What you say is common sense, yes... it's safe to put it in.

      But what about htat one time the guy put something in the wrong way? In the wrong place? Too close to a steam pipe where it could catch fire?

      I'm not implying it's dangerous. I'm saying there is a case for having some things, especially when we're talking about an assett like your HOUSE, done professionally... because you don't necessarily KNOW everything about doing such an installation, wheras a professional has more experience. I'm sure your logic will fall on deaf ears if by some freak chance the insurance company finds out the fire happened when some wiring you did yourslef got too close to somethign else, or that you nicked a gas line by accident...... they won't be paying for your house.

  17. True Story... by term0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    In my first flat me and my flatmates (roommates) networked our house. All we had on hand was a knife sharpener and a Mallet. So, knife sharpener was placed against the wall, and given a nice thumb with the mallet. The entry wounds (my name for them) were quite nice and neat, only about 3 cm diameter of disturbed wall. However, the exit wounds on some walls had cracks up to about 1 metre long and actual openings of about 10 cm in diameter.

    However, a few well placed posters and a lenient landlord helped :)

    All in all, it was a nice reliable, albeit co-ax, network.

    Nowadays I have a nice neat network, using lots of cable ties, packing tape and lots of Cat5. I am currently doing free computer work for a sparky friend in the hope that I can get some Cat5 installed for free when I buy my own home.

    1. Re:True Story... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Everyone *knows* that exist wounds are the ones that cause the real damage! Nice neat hole in your forhead, gaping crevace at the base of your skull...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:True Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... no you idiot, the exit wound IS the damage. Or have you seen a hole in the back of somebody's head get up and start trashing the place?

    3. Re:True Story... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Everyone *knows* that exist wounds are the ones that cause the real damage! Nice neat hole in your forhead, gaping crevace at the base of your skull...

      well, I imagine the no exist wounds arn't a problem at all.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  18. Poor bastards. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    Someone should have thrown these people a link before they dug up some walls.

    http://www.apple.com/airport/

    In all seriousness, not to sound "640k is enough..." but why not just go wireless for a home network? IF you have the sw security in place, what's the need for all the speed? Wouldn't an 802.11g setup be enough for downloads, gaming, vnc, p2p, whatever? Seems a lot easier than doing cable drops unless you want to stream DVD's. Wouldn't Divx streaming be fine at 802.11g speed too!?!

    1. Re:Poor bastards. by Zarquon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because I was upgrading from a true 10 mbit network (10B2.. people kept #@!#ing with the T-connectors) and wasn't about to take a performance hit, as well as a large monetary hit.

      Shared files on 10 mbit were fairly slow, and print jobs for the new printer were taking minutes per page to spool on complex pages.

      10/100 card, $8/port.
      16 port switch, $90. 7 ports used, $13/port.
      Wall plate / jack, $8/port.
      Cable: Had leftover partial spool of 5e, free.
      price per port for switched 100 mbit? $29

      7 port wireless:
      Price /port of pci wireless card: $50-70. Call it $60.
      Access point, varies, $80 for an okay one. $11/port.
      Price per port: $71 / port for shared 11 mbit that goes down anything someone turns on the microwave.

      G wasn't widely available when I put the 10/100 in, but current prices seem to be:

      Did I include time to run the wire and terminate it? No.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re:Poor bastards. by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Wireless is great for mobile devices, laptops etc. However, in my opinion, ethernet is much better for any type of fixed network as it does allow altogether more bandwidth.

      It's also easier to expand. I regularly purchase used computer systems and add them to my network to do tasks, and it's altogether cheaper to buy a Realtek card and CAT5 cable to plug into one of my switches than purchase a WiFi card to include it within my wireless network.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:Poor bastards. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Sure, except that it's vastly more expensive (excluding time involved in running the wires), is susceptible to external influences (better hope not too many neighbors have 2.4GHz phones, or that the microwave is too noisy, or that a neighbor also has a wireless network... an 802.11b one...), there are many devices that aren't compatible with wireless networks (sure... you can buy a bridge... which is how much more again?), and the ever present security issue.

      As it happens, I have both a wired and a wireless network. I ran the cables for the wired network a couple years ago, and a few months ago my wife wanted to setup a wireless AP for her laptop. Works just fine, and it's a good medium -- wired for most things, wireless for anything that'll move around a lot.

    4. Re:Poor bastards. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the math. Cause thinking about it now, if you really are putting in a "serious" home network, I've gotta thing print servers, seperate firewall box, mini-lan parties and music/divx/etc flying all over from drive to drive. Wired would be the way to go and it's much cheaper like you said. Although I really thing the time/cost of doing the cable drop, in my mind, would be high. Cable drops not fun. Poking holes in walls less fun. Especially for renters, but that's drifiting away from the intent of the story.

      What about gigabit? I don't remember seeing that in the article. Practicle for the home network? Apple laptops and a few dells I think come with Gigabit. Mmmmm. Fast pr0n. :)

    5. Re:Poor bastards. by brakk · · Score: 1

      "Poking holes in walls less fun. Especially for renters"

      If it's done right, I doubt anyone would ever notice. At least until the new tenets move in and try to plug a phone into it. And if you want to take the connectors with you, just buy a bunch of blank plate covers to cover the hole.

    6. Re:Poor bastards. by mgoff · · Score: 1

      Price per port: $71 / port for shared 11 mbit that goes down anything someone turns on the microwave.

      My wireless basestation is sitting on top of my 80s-era giant microwave, and I am able to continue high-speed BitTorrent down/uploads with no effect on my transmission speed, even when a nuke is in session. The microwave may affect my wireless bandwith, but my WAN link (DSL) is always the bottleneck.

      Also, I live in an (rented) apartment in San Francisco with no attic, plaster walls, and neighbors below (who might not appreciate my cables). WEP, MAC filtering, and ZoneAlarm are easy, quick, and smart. There are some valid faults, but wireless is a must have for me.

    7. Re:Poor bastards. by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      Well, you may have a later gen hardware/firmware combo than I was using. 3com managed access points, 1 per floor, Lucent/Orinoco 802.11b cards, signal at 4(or 5)/5 bars (don't recall dBm or snr). The microwave in the room, or while in a classroom across from a lounge, would drop the signal to 1 mbit or drop out altogether when turned on.

      BTW, most 'high speed' bittorrents aren't likely to consume more than 1 mbit anyway; Assuming you are the sole person using the channel, you probably wouldn't notice if it falls back to 1 mbit.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
  19. I built a computer from scratch, too! by dokebi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just called up Dell and told them what to put in my box. I told them to put in P4 3Ghz, instead of 2.8GHz because it's better, and only slightly more expensive. I also told them what color cables to use. Moderators: It's funny, because it's True

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  20. Unless all your equipment is wireless... by bbk · · Score: 1

    Out of the 6 ethernet capable devices I have in my home, only 2 could take a wireless card - the others (an xterminal, slotless all in one system, xbox, dreamcast w/brodband adapter) are out of luck. If you could actually put wireless cards into all those systems, it migh be worth it.

    Wireless cards also cost 4 - 5x the same as a 10/100 card, and offer less than half the performance. When I'm copying data, or burning a DVD off of a network server, I need that bandwidth. You may not, especially if you don't have a lot of data movement needs.

    And I don't have to worry about security at all.

    Seriously, if you're building a place to live, get wired. It'll cost a bit more, but I get the feeling that wireless will go the way of telephone modems - stuck at 56K and 54Mbit/sec for a long time, never improving (due to standards compliance).

    All this while you can get a Gigabit ethernet card for $70. Saving a few minutes copying files is worth having a wire.

    1. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1

      I have two words for you: Wireless Bridge.

      The Linksys WET-11 will connect one or more wired ethernet devices to a wireless network without seamlessly. It works great!

    2. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by bbk · · Score: 1

      And how much per unit does one of those cost, as opposed to running cable? What kind of performance hit do you take?

      Seriously, not worth it. Nice for your piddly 30k/sec internet download, not good enough for a transfer between machines on a local network.

    3. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the XBox, Dreamcast, and other devices you mentioned in your previous message. Those certainly do not need more bandwidth than 802.11b provides.

    4. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by bbk · · Score: 1

      Streaming Mpeg 4 video (shifted TV, courtesy of the TV card in my server)to a media player on the xbox (which is running linux) over 802.11b doesn't work - I have a friend with an almost identical setup as I have, and video simply doesn't play smoothly for him.

      Seeing as this is the case, I can't imagine future technology needing less bandwidth than is currently availible, only more.

    5. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird... TiVo has no trouble sharing video between units over a wireless network.

    6. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      No, but it does so at about half the speed of a wired network... with a wired network you can share a show recorded at High slightly faster than realtime. If you can get a medium quality recording to transfer in realtime over wireless then you're lucky.

    7. Re:Unless all your equipment is wireless... by topham · · Score: 1

      Without knowing the specifics I'll assume the bandwidth is adaquate... but the buffering is probably not.

      Wireless can be affected by noise, and retries can allow the streaming buffers to be depleted. increase the buffer sizes and see if it helps.

      And keep in mind, if your on wireless network you probably have HALF available bandwidth.

  21. an article not worth reading by drhannibal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I made the mistake of reading this entire article. I recommend to all those who entertain the idea skip it. Important questions such as cat6 vs. 5e vs wireless a/b/g aren't given sufficient coverage. Instead it reads like an advertisement for some lame-o contractor. Few people build a home network like this. The guy tells you how to hire a contractor to do the hole punching for you! This isnt the slashdot way: we like punching our own holes in the walls and crawling around in attics and toiling in insulation. Sorry THG, usually your articles have at least marginal worth, this one was a real loser. From someone who has installed their own (highly pleasing, if you know what i mean) home network, dont read this article. Cover your eyes. If you want the advice this article gives you, I can summarize in one sentence. Hire a contractor. On the other hand, if you read slashdot, go to fry's, buy 1000m of cat5/e and a few face plates, get out the hammer and the pocket knife and start doing it big...

    1. Re:an article not worth reading by Snoopy77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I made the mistake of reading this entire article. I recommend to all those who entertain the idea skip it.

      Damn it! The one time I decided to RTFA and it's a dud. I swear I'll never read an article again!

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    2. Re:an article not worth reading by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Excellent, you'll be well prepared for a life as a prolific poster on Slashdot, then.

    3. Re:an article not worth reading by Zekat · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot, please do not feed the trolls. :-)

      --
      Mmm, donuts.
    4. Re:an article not worth reading by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      I agree...he seems to be bragging that he has a 19" rack in the basement. Other than that - so what. He ran some cables and found that your normal house builder doesn't give a rats ass about doing coax decently.

      What's next? a THG 10 page article on patch cords with the final resolution being to just buy the ones at the store.

  22. Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by borgasm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another idea for a home network is to run special cable rather than separate phone, ethernet, and coaxial.

    It is bundled Cat5, telephone, and coaxial, and comes in a tight package not much larger than heavily shielded (RJ-6 coax?).

    You can easily run central distribution of phones, video on demand, networking...etc...

    Kill 3 birds with one stone....

    1. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the advantage to running these seperately, is, as in software, modularity.

      If Cat5e is determined 5-10 years down the road to not adequately support your needs (frex. streaming HDTV res mpeg from the basement to the family room tv), you don't have to pull the whole bundle and replace each just so you can run Cat6 to support gigabit over copper.

      I think the decisions made in the article Re: Cat6 were right. Since this stuff is in the walls, you don't want to have to screw with it in the future.

      As they say, it's a lot easier to put it in than it is to take it out.

    2. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by JPM+NICK · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about buying this for my home. I think this is what you were talking about.
      http://www.hometech.com/techwire/combo.html

    3. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Another idea is to pull a strand of string through the wall too. That way, years later when you decide to add another cable, you attach the new cable and a new piece of string to one end of the old string, and pull it through from the other end. Very cheap and easy to do if you do it in advance, and a real time-saver later on.

      --

      The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

    4. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by kinnell · · Score: 2, Funny
      Another idea is to pull a strand of string through the wall too

      Also, by attachin a used yoghurt pot to each end of the string, it can double as an inexpensive room to room intercom system.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    5. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by MrMickS · · Score: 1
      Why run different cable types for phone?

      I wired my home with Cat5 cabling over 4 years ago and thought about putting in phone as well. The cabling in Cat5 is good enough for phone though so I've just used convertors on the RJ-45 sockets where I need phone. By putting more Cat5 than I thought I needed I can put phone in and I'm safe for when I go to VoIP later on.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    6. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Surely Cat5 is better than necessary for phone? :)

    7. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by swb · · Score: 1

      It's also expesnive and it presumes you want those things run to every location. We're getting close to ending a 2 month remodel and I put a pair of cat5 in many more places than I put coax, and I think I pulled almost as much speaker wire as I did cat5.

      What does make sense is to have a multiple spools of whatever it is you're pulling so that you can minimize the time it takes to pull multiple runs.

      I don't know if they make it, but I wish I could have found double-jacketed speaker wire -- ie, two jacketed pairs in a single jacket that could be stripped back near the end of a run for seperate speakers. I found pulling speaker wire ALWAYS as a pair, especially when pulling N runs of it was a pain.

      It also helps to have the right tools. One thing I found handy, especially for working in finished rooms/walls was this Greenlee wire-pulling drill bit. It consists of a ~5' rod with a cone-shaped boring bit and a right-angle bracket that can be used to orient the bit down into the bottom plate of a wall through a wallplate cutout. There's a wire pulling hanger that gets attached to the bit once it's into the space below and you can then pull the wire back up into the opening, slowly reversing the drill as you go. It also works well for other situations where a 5' flexible drill bit would be handy.

      I've also found that bailing wire is excellent for difficult fishing situations as well -- it's highly bendable but has excellent pulling strength -- I can fish it simpler than fishtape in short, tight angle situations.

    8. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. Why lay lots of different types of cable when just laying one type will cover multiple uses? I found that buying the roll(s) of cable I needed to run the networking cabling I wanted I had enough cable to use for phone in the rooms that needed it.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    9. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by macrom · · Score: 1

      I built my current house so I started off at an advantage, but here are a few ideas that I tossed around. Before the list, let me point out that running your cable while a house is in frame stage is the way to go. :^)

      1. Run small PVC pipes from the gang boxes to the attic. This gets you a way to drop cables easily without the need to figure out how many layers of frame you need to bore through to get a route.

      2. If your house is already done, go up in the attic and punch out the triple-expanding foam that's usually holding wires in place (at the top of a frame section for your wall, ie). Attach a piece of fish wire (or string) to the current cable; pull the cable and the fish wire through with your new cable attached. Pull the old cable and fish wire back out. This is a nice pain in the ass, but it worked for me getting a new network jack dropped in my closet (for the WAP).

      3. Pop boxes are your friend. They're super cheap at your local huge-ass hardware store. Take a Dremel tool and cut the drywall shape out for the box. Pop it in. Voila! Instant gang box.

      4. Air ducts can work, but you will need to punch holes in the tubes in your attic potentially (to get the cables out). There are all sorts of expanding foam options that will seal the hole around the cable.

      5. If you are building the house, ask the electrician to add outlets in closets and other obscure places. This will allow you the freedom to store servers, WAPs, switches, etc. If you're building the house, you can usually just go nail a gang box where you want it, label it as needing electrical wire and they'll wire before the house is drywalled. NEVER ask the builder to add them; ours charged $80 per outlet! A 24 case of Budweiser to the subcontractors will get you as many extra outlets as you can handle.

      Happy cabling!

    10. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
      by attachin a used yoghurt pot to each end of the string, it can double as an inexpensive room to room intercom system.

      if [ "$nationality" == "AMERICAN" ]; then
      sed 's/yoghurt pot/dixie cup/g' < $in > $out
      fi
      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    11. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Another other idea is to run a Cat5e backbone and use VoIP and streaming technologies over the IP network. That way you don't need to run special cable, just the $50/1000ft spools you can buy ay home despot.

      --Dan

    12. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they make it, but I wish I could have found double-jacketed speaker wire -- ie, two jacketed pairs in a single jacket that could be stripped back near the end of a run for seperate speakers.
      Uhm, so, this is really easy to find, I've got a thousand feet of it in my walls. I just bought "2 pair speaker wire". Yellow jacket around the outside, and red, black, white and some other color (it's been 3 years since I installed it) jackets on the inside.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    13. Re:Cat5 + Coax + RJ-12 by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

      run two cat5s - one for data, one for phone. The cat5 for phone can support up to 4 lines (You only need two wires for a phone)! Or you could hook up two data lines or 8 phone lines per drop.

      Definetly hook up coax, but you don't need a drop for each jack, one run would work for a whole room unless you plan on transmitting data, in which case, make two drops (or more). You can splice a T connector into the cable for each jack. Sort of like the old BNC days. It saves cable. A signal amplifier will be necessary, though.

      --
      Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
      Jack: "Who doesn't??"
  23. Wireless by rf0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought about starting to put holes in walls etc but taking that my walls are about 2 foot thick I decided to just go wireless. 11Mb all round the house and into the garden and not one hole drilled. OK not as fast as wired but so much neater and easier

    Rus

    1. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...but taking that my walls are about 2 foot thick I decided to..."

      Holy shit, where the hell do you live that has 2 foot thick walls? Prison? A ICBM silo? Tora Bora?

    2. Re:Wireless by hughk · · Score: 1
      The walls probably aren't really that thick unless you live in a bank vault or a medieval cottage (thin on the ground in the US). The wall is probably just has a cavity. With a long drill bit and taking time, it is still quite possible to drill through such walls with a domestic drill (750w).

      Wireless is fine until you want networked file systems.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  24. Better use plenum cable in the walls. by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's in the building code in a lot of places and it's no just the law, it's a good idea.

    Plenum cable is pretty much the same as regular CAT, except it's more expensive and more fire resistant.

    Regular CAT in a fire can act like a fuse, moving the fire from one part of the house to another inside the walls.

    1. Re:Better use plenum cable in the walls. by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative
      Better use plenum cable in the walls. It's in the building code in a lot of places

      Actually, no- it's not required in-wall. The only cases where plenum is required is in air ducts, hence the name, plenum cable. Want to guess why? PVC gives off extremely toxic fumes when it burns. Plenum is a little more fire resistant, and a little less toxic.

      Try googling around, you'll find what I found:

      "Plenum Cable: A cable with flammability and smoke characteristics that meet the safety requirements of the National Electrical Code® (NEC®) that allow it to be routed in a plenum area without being enclosed in a conduit. See plenum."

      Regular CAT in a fire can act like a fuse, moving the fire from one part of the house to another inside the walls.

      This is bullshit. It's not a "fuse", but regardless- plenum would eventually do the same thing- it's a little more fire-resistant than PVC, but it'll still burn.

    2. Re:Better use plenum cable in the walls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      "It's not a "fuse", but regardless- plenum would eventually do the same thing- it's a little more fire-resistant than PVC, but it'll still burn."

      FEP plenum cable has a temperature rating of 200 C

      PFA Teflon plenum cable is rated at 260 C.

      PVC sheathed cable maxes out at 105 C, and even worse is PE cable at 80 C.

      Saying Teflon plenum cable is a little more fire-resistant than PVC is like saying Kevlar is only a little more bullet resistant than a wet napkin.

  25. Installing - an easier way by gotr00t · · Score: 1, Informative
    IF you get your house built, you should consider sneaking in wire at night and putting them in the walls before they do the sheetrock. This way, you won't have to bore holes in the walls later.

    A few years ago, I thought ahead, and decided that it necessary in the future to install ethernet at home. Therefore, without the permission of the builder or subcontractor, I just snuck in some wire and stapeled it like they did. Apparently, the subcontractors that did the plastering and sheetrock had no blueprints, as they installed phone jacks where my wires ended (what a deal... it would have cost me $50 for each jack for them to do it officially). About a year ago, I finally got broadband and decided to install a wired home network. The wire that I had installed earlier was 8 lead, and phones needed only 2 wires. Therefore, I wired up the other 6 into a Cat3 ethernet network, which can still do 100mbps just fine.

    1. Re:Installing - an easier way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wired up the other 6 into a Cat3 ethernet network, which can still do 100mbps just fine.

      You only need 2 pairs for ethernet, not 3. And you need CAT5 for 100mbit.

    2. Re:Installing - an easier way by gotr00t · · Score: 1
      That may be, but how do you explain the fact that the network can still do 100 mbps?

      The way that I understand it, twisted pair ethernet requires just 4 wires, and on a Cat5 cable, the other 4 wires are just duplicates. The speed dosn't rely on how many leads are present, it only affects how far the network can reach. I think that Cat5 can go 300 feet, but Cat3 a lot less...

  26. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes (2 pair vs 4 pair) by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

    Cat5 wire usually has four pairs. Only two pairs are needed (the pins 1,2 pair and the pins 3,6 pair). I have run two circuits on one cat5 cable. It seems to work fine.

  27. tip number one by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right off the bat, I see one very evil problem with the article- they show cables with those $@#!ing boots.

    I'm gonna make this as clear as possible:
    NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER BUY ETHERNET CABLES WITH BOOTS.

    Why? Because you can't plug them into switches/hubs/routers unless the device has spacing to allow for the boot. Many, many devices don't! The boots also do a great job of interfering with the case of many systems with builtin ethernet.

    Oh, and here's another tip for the readers, a VERY common myth- I didn't see if they mentioned this, but you CANNOT just do "same color order on both ends". The whole point behind twisted pair is that the twisted pairs reduce loss from magnetics. In order to take advantage of that, you have to use the pairs properly- ie, you need to put the pairs on the rx and tx pairs on the connector, or you've got a signal flowing over different pairs, and that's WRONG. I had to correct several coworkers at two different jobs, who were wiring cables any old way, just making the ends the same. Surprise, the cables worked like shit. Folks- 100BaseT spec only allows for ONE INCH of untwisted wire on the entire cable, so don't go making really long untwisted leaders into the connectors. It's a pain to get the hang of it and getting 'em all lined up right, but it needs to be done properly!

    1. Re:tip number one by Sokie · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna make this as clear as possible:
      NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER BUY ETHERNET CABLES WITH BOOTS.


      Just a note, but most of the boots that I've encountered can be slid back away from the connector using a little elbow grease. I've found the boots to be a PITA sometimes as well, but it's also a PITA to have lots of RJ45 plugs with the little tabby thingy broken off because you were sure that the cable would come free if you just pulled a little harder. ;)

      So I guess personnally, I wouldn't be as unequivocal in my avoidance of boots. I have a bag of boots around here somewhere so I can put them on cables (even on just one end) if I think it's going to be helpful...

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    2. Re:tip number one by Edward+Scissorhands · · Score: 3, Informative

      As well, make sure that you use google to search for T-568A or T-568B. These are the proper standards for wiring Cat5 ethernet. To make a straight-through cable, use the same wiring standard at both ends. To make a cross-over cable, make one end 568A and the other end 568B.

      Aww, what the hell. I do the Google search for you.

      Excellent resource, but it's a large PDF.

      Also, if you're in the middle of some renovations and your walls are being shifted or otherwise opened, run all of your cable in conduit! This will make upgrades much easier. Plan ahead!

    3. Re:tip number one by Spoing · · Score: 2, Informative
      Folks- 100BaseT spec only allows for ONE INCH of untwisted wire on the entire cable, so don't go making really long untwisted leaders into the connectors. It's a pain to get the hang of it and getting 'em all lined up right, but it needs to be done properly!

      The method you recommend is a pain because you're doing it wrong! (It's also something I would have recommended a few years ago when many of my cables would not work or work well.)

      At that time, I met a phone installer. After going through cable after cable of my own tedious and exact cables, I shut up and watched him. The first thing he did was sheer off about 6 inches of the cover, using the pull string to slit it open. Then, pulling each wire up like hair on a doll, he moved each into position and started to align them, dancing the wires around each other only as necessary. Only at the last moment did he pull all the wires together and snip them off before putting a connector on and crimping.

      This takes ~45 seconds if you're slow, and ~10 seconds if you're at the level of the phone installer I mentioned. The resulting cable ends that always work. To learn this method takes a hell of a lot less practice.

      If you try this method and it does not work, find someone who knows what they are doing and watch them!

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    4. Re:tip number one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna make this as clear as possible:
      NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER BUY ETHERNET CABLES WITH BOOTS.

      Why? Because you can't plug them into switches/hubs/routers unless the device has spacing to allow for the boot. Many, many devices don't! The boots also do a great job of interfering with the case of many systems with builtin ethernet.


      Many devices do (every one that I've dealt with), and the boots prevent the weak tabs from catching on nearby wires and breaking off. "NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER" is a very strong four words.

      Oh, and here's another tip for the readers, a VERY common myth- I didn't see if they mentioned this, but you CANNOT just do "same color order on both ends". The whole point behind twisted pair is that the twisted pairs reduce loss from magnetics. In order to take advantage of that, you have to use the pairs properly- ie, you need to put the pairs on the rx and tx pairs on the connector, or you've got a signal flowing over different pairs, and that's WRONG.

      There's more to than that even - the different pairs have different twist rates, which give different noise resistance. The pairs assigned to 10/100 BaseT ethernet have the best noise resistance.

    5. Re:tip number one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do know what I am doing.

      He is talking about using punch down jacks, not crimp on terminators such as RJ45. The idea is to maintain the twists up to the point of termination. Only undo what you need to finish the termination. Be careful as the twists per inch are different for each pair of wires. This is why it is important to follow a spec. Use the wrong pairs and you risk crosstalk.

    6. Re:tip number one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same guy, at work)

      Much of the same thing applies to punch down; strip, pull, arrange. The only difference is when you clip and connect the wires.

    7. Re:tip number one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and here's another tip for the readers, a VERY common myth- I didn't see if they mentioned this, but you CANNOT just do "same color order on both ends".

      yes you can. you use the proper color order..

      I use B - orange, not orange,green,not blue,blue,not green,brown,not brown.

      (not blue is white with blue stripe.. I'm a digital electronics guy, the inverse of a signal is the NOT signal.)

      if you want to use A swap green and orange pairs.

      if you do it any other way you are a complete moron... hell the jacks and patch panels have the colors laid out for you on pretty stickers... any idiot that isn't color blind can do it without trouble.... that is why articles on how to do this blow my mind.. if you dont knw already or cant use google to figure it out for standards then you have no business nor the grey matter installing a network in your home.

      but then I feel the same way about anyone who doesnt use jacks and a patch panel.. or can't crimp an end without crimping it and having less than 1/4 inch of wire... Come on, it's not rocket science or an art... it just takes a tiny bit of effort and practice...

    8. Re:tip number one by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok first off I have been making ethernet cables since the late 80's and I have never done it any way but this if I had a choice. Giving yourself an inch or more of cable to untwist and allign is significantly easier to flatten with your fingers. Using standard rj45 ends and crimper just trim insert and crimp you wont have any untwisted before the plastic seperators. You can also make your life easy and use the AMP pull through connectors no muss no fuss unless your have nonstandard switches and patch pannels that dont have the key slot (cheap switches generaly it's a patend thing or something that I think AMP has about those key slots a knife fixes the issue)

      Now as far as home wirering why would you ever be terminating to rj45 ends? You go keystone to patch or keystone in the walls and generaly buy your cat 5 whips (standed cable is better for a whip it's more flexable and not as prone to breakage from repeated flexing) Persoanly I went with the Leviton wall plates and keystones from home depot mostly because they were cheaper than any other vendor I could find. Pull an aditional cable to each end point along with coax and a pull cord with a 2 store house the only hard pull was to the attic distrobution pannel and for that I used a surpluss 50 pair trunk and a few coax runs. One distrobution switch in the attic and one in the basement with a gige connecting the two along with voice, serial and digital sat.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    9. Re:tip number one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right on with both of these tips. Good points.

    10. Re:tip number one by wetshoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      An even easier way to ensure that your cables are up to spec is to buy one cable from OfficeDepot/buy.com/any other place, and then use that cable as a template. You can see exactly how the cable is to be set up, and you can then compare these two cables side by side.
      I've found it easier to teach people to make cat5 cables by giving them one and telling them to copy it, instead of giving them a picture. If you give them a picture, they inevidably (bad spelling) mess up the cable, usually make it backwards.

    11. Re:tip number one by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Now as far as home wirering why would you ever be terminating to rj45 ends?

      You raise a very good point. Anyone who's installing network wiring should use a patch panel and patch cables. Just crimping connectors on the ends of that cat5 solid wire is asking for trouble. Connecterized ends just make a big spaghetti mess, the tabs break off, and frequently the connectors don't crimp on solidly and you get infuriating intermittant connection loss. Take it from an installer (me): use a patch panel

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:tip number one by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      More importantly unless they are using stranded cable (aka Whip Cable) they are going to end up with breakage as the line is moved repeatedly. Your normal 1000' pull box is meant to be permantly installed in walls and realy not move much unlike a whip cable thats designed to go from the wall to the end station or from patch to switch.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  28. Sorry... by poptones · · Score: 2
    Is it still a boycott if I never read it in the first place?

    Really, I don't get /. citing all these THG articles. If there is a any site on the net ten years past it's prime, it's that waste of bandwidth at Tom's House & Garden.

  29. Re:Goatse Receiver, ass contortionist, dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what ?
    simoniker is dead ?????

  30. It's overkill! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was major overkill. A real geek would have just ran some cat-5 to the rooms, hooked it upto a switch or hub in the closet and done!

    Who needs a contractor and wallplates??

    Real geeks have loose cables laying all over the house!!!

  31. Homeowneritis by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >A project that began as a simple network installation was morphing into something more complex

    The most dangerous words you can think during a remodeling project are "as long as we're here, we might as well..."

    1. Re:Homeowneritis by schussat · · Score: 2, Redundant
      The most dangerous words you can think during a remodeling project are "as long as we're here, we might as well..."

      So true. The very same thought turned a 10-minute repair into a five-hour ordeal on my back underneath the eveaporative cooler on my roof last weekend.

      The next most dangerous words are, "That can't be too hard. It might even be fun."

      -schussat

      --
      The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
    2. Re:Homeowneritis by NaDrew · · Score: 1

      Mod that up. This describes the last three months (and probably the next six months) of my life. Though we do now have a "catwalk" running from the custom climbing tree, across the hall and through a nicely finished hole in the wall into the stairwell. And a remote TV connected to the DirecTV receiver's RF out, cable run through the floor and the TV mounted on the wall. And new screens in the sliding doors, and a whole lot of plants and trees and stuff in the back patio, and a fountain in the front. As long as we were cleaning the living room...

      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    3. Re:Homeowneritis by dpilot · · Score: 1

      You mean like when your wife says, "This ought to be a half-hour job."

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:Homeowneritis by elsegundo · · Score: 1

      The most dangerous words you can think during a remodeling project are "as long as we're here, we might as well..."

      The next most dangerous words are, "That can't be too hard. It might even be fun."


      I think this also applies to software maintenance. :)

      --


      The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    5. Re:Homeowneritis by topham · · Score: 1

      Thats also the most dangerous thought when dveloping software. (specificly, redeveloping software).

      While I'm in the source file I might as well fix...

  32. Re:So what happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'll just watch the movie

  33. Attn. UK /.'ers by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    B&Q (well at least the bigger stores) now stock a whole range of home networking kit that is wau cheaper than same stuff in PC World. Not a lot of people know that.

    1. Re:Attn. UK /.'ers by The_Spud · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do a kit for about £30 that includes 50m of cat 5e, four boxes with double socket wallplates and four keystone jacks and tools. Just installed a network in my new house with this. Much neater than the old coax cable spagetti that I used to have. You can buy extra keystones but there are about £2.50 each which is a bit pricy.

    2. Re:Attn. UK /.'ers by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Indeed they do. Shame they seem to run out so bloody often though.

      Can't win 'em all!

  34. Why people DON'T have home networks by PizzaFace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to think the process described in the article was the way to build a home network, and that's why I didn't have a home network. Like a big LEGO sculpture, it's cool to look at, and some geeks will make a hobby of it, but it's not a project for most people who just want a useful end-product.

    Now there's WiFi, and even the cheap 802.11b hardware is fine for sharing files, printers, and broadband. Buy a USB adapter for each remote computer and you don't even need to open the cases. You can have everyone connected in an hour. Now THAT is practical home networking.

  35. We have Fiber && Cat-5 to every room by arcadum · · Score: 0
    When we remodled our home we wired every room with an expensive cabble that carried two Cat5, optics, Coax. All of this was routed to my closet which is now the communications node of the house.

    I moved my servers to the basement but the switch, router, cable modem, and telephone trunc. begin in said closet.

  36. In a pinch, try your telco wiring! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    My condo is wired with four pair cat 3 wiring for the phones. The wiring was installed before the floor, and runs underneath it. The crawl space is way too small to run new wires. I was resigned to using wireless until I realized that the phone wires are looped from location to location rather then home run back to the telco block in the back of the building (This is a 5 unit condo; mine is the middle unit). Since one of the loops went directly from where the switch is to where I needed the computer, I decided to try and use two of the unused pairs in the Cat 3 for ethernet. It worked! I also get full 100 Mhz speed. See, the Cat 5 spec specifies 100 Mhz speed over a 300+ foot run, while my run of cat 3 is only about 35 feet. Yes, the (single) phone line does run in one of the other pairs, including the DSL. I borrowed a cable tester and found that this did not affect my speed at all. This scheme cost nothing but an hour's time terminating the jacks and saved me hundreds of dollars over having a professional run cables under the floor. Finally, I'm typing this right now on the bedroom computer, the very one that's hooked up with telephone wire to the network.

    1. Re:In a pinch, try your telco wiring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the telco or whoever sets up the cables doesn't decide to use the other 2 pairs (the pairs you are running ethernet over ) you are fine, of course if they do... -50 volts DC nomial, 90 volts AC 20Hz ringing...

  37. Obligatory, of course by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    1. Post infomercial on THG

    2. Get picked up by /.

    3. ???

    4. Profit!

    Seriously, this article was nothing more than a shameless plug, an informercial for a consulting firm. If there was any reference to total cost of the project, broken down by labor and equipment (they brought their lead engineer and project manager for Chrissake!), I must have completely missed it. (Maybe I was too busy studying the pictures, which all looked suspiciously like hammers to me).

    What I'd like to see is a DIY home networking guide for the rest of us.

  38. "Real Man's Network"? Wired and wireless! by Loudog · · Score: 1

    Run 3 Cat5(e or 6. whatever) and 2 RG6 in each bundle. Use a switch in your core (do you game? Who wants collisions?) and a good router/firewall on the edge. The wireless network is for PDA's and tablets; make sure you enable WEP and shut down broadcast of the ESSID. Set up a Linux content server and hack your Tivo.

    Now you have a real network.

    Remember: a Sawzall is your friend!

  39. meh by pirodude · · Score: 1

    What a shitty article. I'm a teenager and have wired pleanty of houses around the neighborhood. You don't need to hire a damn contractor (electricians are usually really bad about pulling cable, as they're used to pulling phone cable and not data cable). If you have a drill, some bits, string, a few bolts, and a drywall saw you can do it all yourself. If you do more than a few jacks throughout the house go out and get a fish tape, a nice super long drill bit and some friends to help you on the weekend.

    1. Re:meh by BrianDesmond · · Score: 1

      >electricians are usually really bad about
      >pulling cable, as they're used to pulling phone
      >cable and not data cable

      You might want to get yourself a chunk of "data cable" and a chunk of "phone cable". You'll find that they're more or less the same in the construction of the jacket. CAT5/6 is a bit more flexible.

      --
      --Brian Desmond
    2. Re:meh by pirodude · · Score: 1

      What I was refering to was their pulling techniques. I use cat5e/cat6 for phones and LAN.

      With phone cables they can nick the jacket and pull on it hard. With data cable you need to be careful not to stretch it out, observe the paths you pull (watch out for those power cables) and crimp it properly.

  40. Cheeep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing can beat my used 10baseT hub and some recycled ethernet cables... all sharing my files and internet among my family just fine.

  41. I was lucky by @ngel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I and my three roommates moved into our house we rent right now, we were lucky: the landlords were just finishing the renovations, and we (being graduates with IT degrees) quickly suggested they let us run CAT5 all over the house while things were still in the "rebuilding" phase. After about 3 minutes of describing the benefits, they agreed, and we quickly got a network map laid out.

    We now have CAT5, phone, and coaxial cable running to 7 rooms, all faceplated, across 3+ floors. They all meet in the basement of the house, with the chimney acting as a backbone guide. The Cable modem, router, and switch are all down there, on a custom built shelf. We run a Wireless base station in the attic for all our laptops, and have almost no visible wiring (the only visible wiring being the cat5 to the desk).

    The point is if you start off from the beginning and plan for cat5 around the house, it makes it a lot easier. Granted, we had our landlords/carpenters to help us find our way into walls and floors to get it from the basement to the attic. But it works, we've never had a problem, and the house is now cleanly wired for ethernet, which our landlords love, for future tenents.

    So yes, a little planning goes a LONG way!

  42. Don't make it too complicated by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your home has phone lines, right?

    Go onto EBay and get some nice US Robotics Courrier HST modems, one for each room. Next, find some speedy 486DX-50 (not DX2-50) boxen, also one per room.

    As you add more and more 486 and HST modems, both your compute speed and comm throughput tends towards infinte.

    This is the beauty of the Home Beowulf Network!

    Ethernet is for wussies. Real Men (tm) do it at 16.8k.

  43. Keep your walls white by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    And when you move, fill the holes with tooth paste.

    If you cut some holes for wiring boxes, you tape a piece of notebook paper over the hole and paint the wall. I guess if you wanted to do it the home depot way, get some mesh and some spackle. Now remember no home network is complete with out at least 3 separate Unices. So grab a few SparcStations, an SGI or two, throw in an x86 box running Linux or BSD and you've got a good start.

  44. Forgot one very important aspect... by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
    The decision to use a contractor (or not) will be dictated by the complexity of the project and your comfort level regarding handling a project like this by yourself.

    Uh...how about the most important consideration of all...COST!. Dude didn't mention one time the actual cost to hire Mr. Professional-Insured-Network-Installer!

    --
    ***
    Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    1. Re:Forgot one very important aspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obviously a 5-figure job - anyone care to guess just how deep into 5-figures though?

    2. Re:Forgot one very important aspect... by bighoov · · Score: 1

      AC is right on the money here - this is easily a $10,000 job. Probably not for the writer of this article though - "if you cut me a deal, I'll pub your contracting business on THG".

  45. NEVER, EVER, by arcadum · · Score: 0

    Strip the wires, and you will have a headache.

  46. Re:So what happens? by Trendy_Jay · · Score: 1

    Best $8.00 I never spent

  47. What I've done and recommened for wiring. by MrLint · · Score: 4, Informative

    I skimmed over the article and kinda looked bewildered when I saw that rack monster. From the look of this it kinda take the 'new' this old house stance instead of the 'old' this old house stance. That is to say, looks like they are doing new construction as opposed to a geeky retrofit.

    Knowing your house plan is important as well as plan plan planning.

    With DSL you have a bit of room to play. If possible (and environment permitting) I like to tap the phone line right where it comes into the house (usually the basement). Setting a nice shelf on the wall for your modem and (mandatory) router. A small 12" patch panel (larger if you want to do a phone retrofit). With Cable you are sometimes more tied to where the cable comes in, and thats not always the basement.

    But planning is the key. Find where you want to be the heart of the network and try to run stuff there. If possible split the incoming broadband only once before the downlink device (modem).

    Now comes the big question mark that hangs over most people's heads.. how to I do the jacks? Most people are just plain not familiar with the products in this category. There are several manufactures of this stuff I have experience, and happen to like the Panduit mini-com line of products. Most of the vendors have similar competing products. These jacks are not cheap. Try not to skimp and use low quality product. These are modular jacks that snap into not only the patch panel but also wall units that mount into standard electrical boxes (use the blue plastic ones please.. don't slice your data lines). The jacks are color coded and then snap together. You (almost) cant mess it up.

    Now nearly all of your do-it-yourself people will not have a proper TDR (time domain reflectometer) to do exhaustive testing with. If you buy one of those 15 buck line continuity tester and if you use the (nearly) mistake proof jacks, you will probably be just fine for your updated geek home of tomorrow.

    PS. Just because I like to my self I recommend that you run 2 lines if you are going to run one. The cable is cheap and you are already committed to the effort of running it.

    PPS I'll leave the cable choice discussions up to other threads and the article. But if possible, match your jacks to the type of cable you choose.

    I've also done thin-net installations, I can answer a few questions there if someone is a masochist:)

    1. Re:What I've done and recommened for wiring. by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      If possible split the incoming broadband only once before the downlink device (modem).

      When splitting off a cable run, make sure to NOT use the regular splitters you can purchase at Radio Crack. To minimize attenuation (get the strongest signal), use something called a tap. A tap splits like a normal splitter, but with no (appreciable) attenuation, providing a good strong signal for your modem.

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    2. Re:What I've done and recommened for wiring. by brakk · · Score: 1

      Are there any building codes that require using plenum cable in attics or running it through conduits or anything like that?

    3. Re:What I've done and recommened for wiring. by MrLint · · Score: 1

      that is a very good question. In NY I think codes vary from county to county as well as there may also be some state laws. You really need to check with a local govt code enforcement. However it has been recommend to me to use plenum if you wish to run inside of heating ducts, as they can get hot. You will want to avoid the insulation on the wiring breaking down and releasing toxins. I wouldn't worry about running along standard hot water baseboard heating though, there is usually enough play in the hole in the wall and hot water is only 212. You may want to worry if you have steam heat though. that gets much hotter. Now while network cable is low voltage and there is no danger you are going to electrocute yourself, that doesn't mean the building code people know any better:)

  48. Let me tell you... by The+Panther! · · Score: 5, Funny

    (next)


    This is my
    (next)


    story about how
    (next)


    I thought I was a
    (next)


    Real Man for hiring
    (next)


    a contractor to do my
    (next)


    manly work. Call me 404.

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
    1. Re:Let me tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, no shit, what is up with all these sites being cut into single pages with thirty next buttons? Whatever happened to just sticking it all on one long page for cripe's sake.

    2. Re:Let me tell you... by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      More pages means more ads. Lame huh?

  49. Come on by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any serious geek has a raised floor and a communications rack in the linen closet to tie it all together. This article is for people who prefer ceramic tile and carptet to the clunck of a raised floor.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  50. Re:I WANT TO APPLY!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 4th of July is coming up. Start with Lady Fingers and work your way up to M-80's and such.

  51. EXACTALLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES, and this will give me the Borg look I am going after!

  52. Paid ad? by Animats · · Score: 3, Funny
    That article was a paid commercial, right?

    Here's Mr Green, he's so serene, he's got a TV in every room

  53. Re:So what happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehehehehehehehehehehehe, now that was funny!

    offtopic but fscking hilarious

  54. Did I miss something? by janda · · Score: 1

    Ok, so you're a geek building your own house, and you want to wire it up at the beginning.

    Therefore, you buy your cable and you do it. Sheesh. It's not that hard. If nothing else, "Doug", in "home_network-17", was completely wrong.

    If nothing else find sone cute electical engineer you want to bang, and take it out in trade.

    --
    Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  55. Serious ??? by dago · · Score: 1

    "While we could have gone with Category 3 cabling, the cost difference was minor, so we chose to go with the higher quality cabling. (We have no evidence that it makes a difference for ordinary telephone service lines (POTS) one way or the other.) "

    There are no difference between category 3 and 5 when it comes to POTS. It really sounds like : "well, let's take the most expensive one. As it's more expensive, it should be better"

    I know, they are other reasons, e.g. to get same cabling everywhere, but that's not what they did.

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
    1. Re:Serious ??? by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 1

      I just wired a new office building. Let me tell you why with the minimal cost difference that you put in CAT5e. In 3-5 years Voice over IP will be popular. Now what are you going to use all the CAT3 cableing for? This way you can have 2 network jacks in every cube.

    2. Re:Serious ??? by dago · · Score: 1

      you know, that's the article which wasn't serious.

      They are far from pretending that kind of complicated stuff (voice over what ?).

      If you go like that, then why put two different cabling (cat5 for POTS and cat6 for data) if you will converge soon.

      In fact, given their guessed budget, I would have gone all VoIP now, especially as there are some providers in the US.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  56. Are you seriously arguing against plenum in homes? by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you were going to build a house for yourself with network cable in the walls, why would you use something that burns readily and creates loads of toxic smoke?

    Oh, and yes, non-plenum cable can indeed carry fire from one part of a building to another.

    In 1975 there was a large fire at One World Trade Center that luckily occurred in the middle of the night when the building was unoccupied. The One World Trade Center fire was analyzed in great detail and a report was issued by The New York Board of Fire Underwriters Bureau of Fire Prevention and Public Relations. The information gathered in this investigation was used to further develop New York City Local Law 5. The following are some of the observations/ conclusions of the report.

    "The [exposed] polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cable insulation and plastic back panel blocks burned readily so that virtually all combustibles including the fire retardant wood paneling on the telephone closet walls of the 10th and 12th floors were destroyed".

  57. Tips and tricks for running copper/fiber by LoRdTAW · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I have a nice home network that consists of copper strung through the walls. And if you want a professional looking job here are some tips and tricks to use:
    - first place to check is your basement. Older homes might have had duct work for forced air heating but since switched to steam/hot water. I have helped my friend wire his whole house using the old ducts as pathways for running the cable.
    - IF you want to run cable through the walls the outer walls of your home are filled with insulation thus making it near impossible to pull cable. the next best walls are walls inside your home that both side of the walls are inside your home. they are hollow and can easily have cable pulled through them.
    - Closets are your friend as you can drill holes in them without having to worry about people seeing them. I have a cable that runs from my basement to the second floor closet through a hollow inner wall and then through the closet floor into the ceiling into the attic where I pulled the wire along to another room and drilled down through its closet to run the cable.
    - If you want to know where studs are inside the walls of your home the standard spacing is 16 inches from the nearest corner. most any tape measure will have 16 inch markings for stud locations. But be aware this method isn't always 100% as some times they might be a much as 2 inches off.
    - attics are also another great place to run cable. locate the room below you want to run cable to and drill from the attic to that rooms closet if it has one to conceal the cable.
    - most homes have a molding around the floor. you can remove it with a pry bar without damaging it and cut holes into the sheet rock or plaster and run wire through them. Replace the molding to cover up the hole. always remember to not make the hole higher then the molding otherwise you just made a mess. This is a good way to get cable from one room to adjacent room/closet.
    - If you do have forced air heating/cooling you can run cable inside the ducts. If you do decide to do this make sure you use plenum rated cable to stay compliant with local/national building codes.
    - Buying cable can sometimes be a problem as you do not know what type or brand to buy. there are two basic cable types regular jackets which most likely be PVC or plenum rated. Plenum cable is designed to give off little or no toxic smoke when burned. this is used inside buildings that use the space inside a drop ceiling as an air duct as well. Also if you plan to run the cable inside an air duct you must use plenum cable to comply with national building codes. So if its just the inside of your home walls the cheap PVC is fine. Also don't go overboard and buy expensive beldin cat 5e stuff. I bought a roll and found it difficult to work with when it came to making patch cables. The crap they sell at the Home Depot is just fine and works good even for gigabit.

    These are good ways to conceal cable and do it the same way an electrical contractor would. Some of you might be a little nervous knocking a hole on a wall or ripping up floor boards but if you want to do it yourself and save big bucks you certainly can. I have personally ran over 500ft of cat5 in my home to 10 different computers in 5 different rooms in my home. And if you ever saw the work you would think a contractor did it.

  58. Re:"Real Man's Network"? Wired and wireless! by rodgerd · · Score: 1

    Make sure your firewall has a third leg for the wireless devices. Use the firewall to control wireless access to the rest of the netowrk, ideally via IPSEC or somesuch.

  59. As i was saying.... by 222 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ive said it before and ill say it again... THG = Slime.

  60. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes (2 pair vs 4 pair) by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Depends on what network standard yuo are using and over what length and under what conditions. For example, you can hook 10tx over 4 straight, untwised wires over a couple feet with no trouble. You can not do the same for 1000tx over a long distance with teh same cable conditions.

    Also you can exceed specs and have things work sometimes. 100metres is teh spec, but I've seen it exceeded. However when you jury righ stuff, like doing to signals over 1 wire, youa re asking for problems. Expect more collisions, jabbers and general errors, or perhasp for it to not work at all.

    The specs do happen for a reason.

  61. CAT-3 works fine for fast ethernet by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Interesting
    At least, it does for me. 2 pairs is all it takes. I'm measuring 93 million bits per second right now over a TCP stream from this workstation to the server in the basement, about 25 meters of wiring away. I have 2 spare phone lines inside the house, each a CAT-3 twisted pair; the two together form a single 100TX connection. Have to be very careful to hook up the wires to the jacks in the right order! Also, I have a 100TX switch at every junction (wall plate) acting as a repeater to keep the signal strong -- multiple splices seemed to degrade the signal enough that the wires would only carry 10 Mbps. I used the cheapest low-power switches I could find two years ago, Linksys EZXS55W, and there doesn't seem to be any extra overhead going through 5 of them (0.2 ms ping times).

    Naturally this wiring will be no good whatsoever for gigabit and higher speeds.... If I ever want to upgrade from 100 megabit I'll have to rewire the house.

    (For the skeptics: yes, you really only need four wires (two pairs) for 100 Mbps fast ethernet. Eight-wire cables are a big fat waste of copper!)

    I've also set up a similar 100 Mbps LAN over CAT-3 at a friend's house and it works fine for him too.

    1. Re:CAT-3 works fine for fast ethernet by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      (For the skeptics: yes, you really only need four wires (two pairs) for 100 Mbps fast ethernet. Eight-wire cables are a big fat waste of copper!)

      Yes the eight wire cables are a waste of copper.

      Thats not the only differance between cat-3 and cat-5. The distance between the twists in the cable is differant. Cat-3 isn't meant to run at 100Mbps, you might be getting all sorts of data loss TCP is covering up for. And it might get worse as the cable gets older.

      Running cat-3 at 100Mbps is asking for trouble.

    2. Re:CAT-3 works fine for fast ethernet by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely not getting any packet loss or data errors. I stress-test the heck out of the network regularly. The LAN as a whole is every bit as reliable and fast as the pure-CAT-5 intra-room segments.

      Before I tried it the idea sounded insane to me too. A friend told me he was getting 10 megabit just fine over 2-pair CAT3 and I all but called him a liar.... After fighting with crappy early PNA implementations for while I decided to give it a try, and voila, it worked just great at 100 Mbps full duplex.

      Naturally there's absolutely guarantee this to work everywhere. It's kind of like overclocking or hotrodding -- you cut down the safety margins and maybe, if you're lucky, it still works fine. No freakin' way I'd do this for a business, but for a home network, what the hell. Might as well give it a try before you start cutting holes in walls. If it works (like mine does) then you've saved yourself plenty of money and effort; if it doesn't, you've only wasted a couple of hours and a few RJ-45 sockets.

      My advice to nerd homeowners everywhere: try the spare CAT-3 first! (This is for serious networking nerds only. If you don't already know how to build and diagnose an ethernet, forget it.)

  62. A number of Good Points by SeverianDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    in the article should be addressed.

    First: Choice of plate terminators, angled is good! THG said it, they keep out dust, and in a home with kids this is a very good thing.

    Second: finding cable runs is a very good thing. You can't go wrong if you choose where your cable is going very carefully. Just think, that 50' length of expensive Cat6 you just cut won't reach to the one place you need it, like the office upstairs where your Significant Other wants to place his/her computer because he/she likes the view. Also, stringing cable outside means that you could be letting in bugs (ants, termites, wasps and bees come to mind, all of which are detrimental to any home owner) and rodents (mice can easilly tear open a hole if they get a handhold).

    Third: Neatness factor was a plus. Those nifty cable loops that they used to string the cable around the basement means no holes. Not boring holes in load-bearing joists and studs can save your bum if you are moving in say... a grand piano and your movers drop it right on that critical spot.

    Mentioning some of the hardware used: great! I like seeing hardware mentioned. This means I can go out and look up honest-to-god reviews of it elsewhere if all the information isn't available on the first review I check. Also, pointing out the cable tester they used was important. When/if I decide to wire my own home I'll deffinitely look for a similar tool.

    Cable versus DSL et al: another good point, find out who supplies what in your area and can you use it? Also, how much does it cost? Personally I would not have opted for DirecTV and just gone with cable all-around. But that was his choice.

    I agree, overall this review could have used alot more meat in the "why'd we choose this bit of kit over that." department. However, as we all know the internet has an almost unlimited supply of information on any topic, just go look it up!

    However, consulting with a contractor can be a very useful tool, even if you decide not to use the services of that contractor, they can provide you with useful information free of charge! If we all could do spot-on wiring of our houses the first time through we wouldn't need contractors for anything. On top of that, if you all missed it, the article mentioned that the writer and his family were prepairing to move in to a new home. As anyone who has moved in to a new home, and supervised its construction, knows that getting other people to do grunt work is a good thing.

    --
    Once more into the birch deer fiends!
    1. Re:A number of Good Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your from THG, airn't you?

  63. Re:Are you seriously arguing against plenum in hom by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you were going to build a house for yourself with network cable in the walls, why would you use something that burns readily and creates loads of toxic smoke?

    If your network cable is burning, you already have far bigger problems on your hands. You realize that most insulation will burn as well, not to mention the drywall and wood that your house is essentially built out of. Yeah, it's all firetreated, but when it does burn it gives off far more noxious smoke than cat5 will.

    Your original statement is still wrong - there is no requirement for plenum cable in residences. There's no need either, unless you're running it through HVAC ducts (which is an entirely separate violation of residential building codes in the first place).

  64. more amdmb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ryan's mentioning of "sponsorship" is rather interesting...anyone else notice the prominent linksys product placement in thg's networking guide?

  65. Mod parent up. by hughk · · Score: 1
    It sounds dumb, but cable pulling isn't easy without having something to pull it with. First thread string through holes using stiff wire and then tie the string to the cable and pull that through (leaving sufficient string to pull further cables).

    Another useful tool for the initial string threading is flexible curtain rail. It is quite stiff and able to be threaded for quite a long way.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  66. Renovate by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

    The best time to do it is of course when you have major work to do on the house. Mine needed major repairs, so I stripped it down to the bare stone and replaced the interior walls, too.
    At that time, I put in the cabling. It all goes to a patch-panel in my under the stairs 'wiring closet'.

  67. Aren't all articles from THG by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    paid advertorials???

    Seriously, I agree, why get a contractor and why write an article about it. I use contractors at work, but every metre of Cat-5 at home is mine.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  68. Re:Keep your walls white-Canned holes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use "foam in a can" to fill in the holes.
    Shredded newspaper will work as well, then spackle over.

  69. Only North Americans need to read it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The rest of the world doesn't have wooden houses...

    BTW, the easiest way to string wires in a North American house, is through the cold air return to the furnace. Guess why you don't want to use the host air ducts for that.

  70. Soap opera, or Hardware review site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, the friendly folks at Hardocp have stepped in to provide some legal assistance for the guy, to make sure he is not railroaded into pulling down his editorial describing THG's media shenanigans.

    More bullshit drama from HardOCP. Last week, it was accusations about Futuremark. This week it's about some supposed media blackout, and accusations that THG might be suing some other website. I mean, come on. Read THG's news page. ABC News and WHAS 840 radio even did a broadcast from the event. Does this sound like a "media blackout" to you?

    "as you can see from the coverage on www.sudhian.com, any other press that came along was treated respectfully and was not hindered in any way. You can also visit the organizers at www.lanwar.com, and you will see clearly that there was no media blackout. In fact, I personally recommeded to the organizers that they get as much as press as they could. Local press such as WHAS 11 TV was there."

    And what business is any of this of HardOCP? At what point did Hard|OCP stop being a hardware site, and start being a fucking soap opera? I've seen twelve year old girls that are less into gossip and rumors.

  71. Holes in wall by BinBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish I'd read this before I attempted - now I have a few (ok, 8) unsightly holes in my wall.

    Worst of all, it was a wireless network. *rimshot* Thank you. You've been a great crowd.

  72. Airport Base Station - Top 10 why to say 'yes' by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...means never having to say you're sorry.

    Top 10 statements, if you use a wireless Airport network, you will not prefacing with "I'm sorry for...":
    1. Another hole in the wall/floor/ceiling
    2. Another unused/unneeded hole in the wall/floor/ceiling
    3. Another spool of cable you may or not use...ever.
    4. Another 6 hours of the network being offline each time 1 & 2 come around.
    5. Another 2 hours of testing to find out if the problem is with the new cable or the router config (each time 1 & 2 come around)
    6. Failing to understand the difference between CAT5 and CAT 6 while standing in the aisle at Home Networks Depot.
    7. Failing to remember to buy 10/100 ethernet hubs (instead of just those cheap 10mbs hubs that still lurk on the shelf).
    8. Failing to properly count and total all existing computers in the home (did you tell me you wanted one in the laundry room too?)
    9. Damn it! When did we buy another PlayStation???
    10. Damn it all to hell! When did they start putting ethernet ports on (insert favorite consumer product here...TV; MP3 player; xyz set-top box; baby monitor; door bell; burgler alarm)
  73. Re:Are you seriously arguing against plenum in hom by Kenneth · · Score: 1

    there is no requirement for plenum cable in residences.

    That's a fairly bold statment. After all, many codes are city and even neighborhood based in many areas. Sure, there is no NATIONAL requirment for it, but many municipalities might. The only way to know for sure would be to do an exaustive search which would take time, since much of that information is not available on the internet.

    Having recently had a fire, I would recommend it. The drywall is actually a pretty good fireblock. Made from gypsum, it WILL burn, but not nearly as easily as wood. I know this because I was in the room at the time. The nearby wood was on fire, the drywall next to it was not, but the paint on it was.

    Fire tends to get into walls and celings through perforations in the drywall, such as light fixtures, and various plug or outlet jacks, whether they be phone, power, cable or network.

    If the cable were to catch fire in one of these, it could easily transfer the fire from where there is nothing else particularly flamable, to something quite a bit more flamable.

    It might not be needed, but most people who have had a house fire would rather be a bit paranoid than go on the cheap, and risk another. House fires really, really suck.

    --
    There is a civil war coming in the United States. Remember which side has most of the guns
  74. Contractors are for pussies. by ahfoo · · Score: 1, Troll

    I was disappointed to see this "serious" article that essentially revolves around picking up the phone and paying money to have someone else do the work.
    I woudn't even let a contractor manage my framing, much less my wiring. This is a good article for someone setting up a Mac network who doesn't want to get their pants dirty. Oh, but then they'd be using WeeFee instead, wouldn't they? It would be good to add some quality adiophile site banners as well.

  75. 100MHz, Re:In a pinch, try your telco wiring! by fruey · · Score: 1
    OK, great, you have a 100MHz network. So it runs at 100,000,000 cycles per second, huh? That's more than the tour de France, of course!

    You'd be better off running it at 100Mb/s, now, wouldn't you? 100 Megabits a Second...

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  76. well what about the nonphysical aspects of network by unclefungus · · Score: 1

    I have seen many tutorials on how to build a network, but they only cover the easy to do hardware (hook a wire to the hub and the other end to the computers!) Where is there a tutrorial for people who dont know alot about networks but don't want to use the "Internet Networking Wizard" that didn't even come with our OS?

  77. All you need to know... by 0rbit4l · · Score: 1
    orange-white, orange, green-white, blue, blue-white, green, brown-white, brown. (reading left-to-right on your rj-45, top-up).

    Regarding all the wired vs wireless discussion so far, why not both? (After all, I thought networking overkill was the slashdot way...) You can pick up an airport base station for around $100 on ebay, and if you don't need a router, a simple wifi bridge will do the trick - bam, wired (for higher speed) + wireless (for convenience when you feel like sitting in the recliner or out on the patio.)

  78. I have a home network... by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Installed in mid 2001 in Australia. At that time, the cost of getting 9 x ethernet ports, 10 x telephone outlets between two lines, TV cable to 4 extra locations and changing existing crappy 600-series telephone sockets to RJ-11 was cheaper than buying wireless bridging gear for the three main computers I had at that time.

    Plus I got 100mbit ethernet instead of 11mbit wireless, and it meant that in the future I was able to add a networked printer in another room without having to buy yet more wireless gear.

    While I'm more than capable of doing the wiring myself (I have done in many north american homes), in Australia many homes, such as mine, are all brick, instead of stud and dry-wall. This makes installing the points a significantly difficult task, so for A$1400 all up (US$700 at the time), I think I got out of it pretty well. This also included a 8 port switch and signal amp for the TV signal.

    I don't trust wireless security to the point of wanting my own access point, thanks muchly. I can put it in my insecure DMZ, but someone might use my bandwidth and monthly data allowance, which just costs me more :P And I don't feel like implementing 802.1X/LEAP/VPNs at home either.

  79. Re:100MB, Re:In a pinch, try your telco wiring! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Okay, okay...it's late and I'm tired...plus I'm an RF guy.... I'm sure everyone knows what I meant to say...

  80. Wireless? by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read the comments and I hear people saying, "Use Wireless, it's less hassle," as well as networking horror stories.

    Well, I've got about both. My first day on the job as a High-Speed Cable installer, I ran my drill through a power main. Knocked me on my ass, and I had to buy a new drill and pay to have the customers house re-wired. Not a fun experience. What did I learn? Look on both sides of the walls, and always ask the customer if they'd like their jack there.

    In my 'house,' Each 'Data box' has 2 Cat5E, a fiber, 2 2-line phone jacks, and 2 Coax. I use this so I can provide a secure/DMZ, have the ability to upgrade, as well as send signals (e.g., videocams) to other devices in my house. The only reason that I use wireless is so I can use the occassional Free Access point that's floating about, and war-driving. My WAP in my house is on, however, it's on a seperate vlan, and no one really uses it.

    Stay away from wireless--sure it's easy, but, do you really want your data out there for the world to see? For the effort that you use to run your wire and make sure the job is done right (e.g., use Mini-Com's from Panduit, make sure they're snapped down all the way, and make sure you've punched down everything/terminated your fiber right), you'll have the satisification that you've done a job right, and that your data is safe and secure.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
    1. Re:Wireless? by MrMickS · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have both wired and wireless networks in my house. They serve different purposes.

      The wired network connects all of my servers together and allows me fast networking when I need it.

      The wireless network allows me to check my email from the sofa or the garden or anywhere else I'm comfortable. Yes there is a chance that someone may see the packets on my network but I'm a) not that parnoid and b) aren't prepared to give up the convience of wireless.

      In short: wireless for ease of use, wired for speed.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    2. Re:Wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your post raises another interesting question:

      Is "aren't" the accepted contraction of "am not?"

    3. Re:Wireless? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      In my 'house,'

      Is that where you 'live'?

  81. Re:well what about the nonphysical aspects of netw by 1s44c · · Score: 1


    1-Install OpenBSD

    2-Configure PF.

    3- ???

    4- Profit!!

  82. Re:100MB, Re:In a pinch, try your telco wiring! by fruey · · Score: 1
    Sure, everyone knows what you meant to say. That doesn't mean you should get away with it ;-)

    Geeks are pedantic, probably because they actually fear someone will read a [random] comment and then end up thinking that's the correct term for it, and the fear is too great not to hit reply.

    I was trying to get the cycles per second / tour de France joke in there actually, but I guess that most /. readers don't follow the tour anyway. Oh well.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  83. Home Networking by maroberts · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did mine (a small 3 bedroomed detached house in England) all by myself.

    I was fortunate in the fact my walls are of plasterboard construction so I had no problems running cable down them, except between floors. I put a switch and a wireless router in the attic.

    What did I learn?
    a) If doing it again I would use some conduit pipe to make rewiring easier. However I did put 4 CAT5 ports in each room, which is enough for any small house!

    b) buy a big roll of cable and make your own cables - its much cheaper that way.

    c) Plan and check before you knock holes in walls

    d) I'm a good network installer but a terrible plasterer, put any holes in walls where they'll be most hidden

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  84. 2 ft. walls? by GreggyBUIUC · · Score: 1

    I entirely understand that the wardens typically frown on putting holes in walls ever since that whole Shawshank mess... but I didn't know that our penal system gave inmates personal computer access to take advantage of such a system. Do you have problems with your cellmate constantly trying to use your connection to DL pr0n? I guess that wouldn't be so bad if it keeps him from getting funny ideas about you in the wee hours of the morning...

  85. Airport Base Station - Top 10 why to say 'no' by rugger · · Score: 3, Funny
    Top 10 statements, if you were not to use a wireless Airport network, you will not be prefacing with "I'm sorry for.."

    1. the network not working in your favourite place due to interference.
    2. paying multiple times the cost of a wired network.
    3. the network being as slow as mollass.
    4. having to buy yet another ethernet to wireless converter.
    5. for the neighbours and passersby hacking into the network.
    6. buying a wireless transeiver that was not powerful enough.
    7. using the microwave and making the network crawl.
    8. the network being hub based, making it even slower.
    9. supporting apple's overpriced products.
    10. attempting to justify my poor networking decisions on slashdot.org!!
    1. Re:Airport Base Station - Top 10 why to say 'no' by djupedal · · Score: 1

      ...hehehehe :)

    2. Re:Airport Base Station - Top 10 why to say 'no' by sharkey · · Score: 1
      the network being as slow as mollass.

      Would that be Richard Moll? Is his ass REALLY as slow as 802.11b?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Airport Base Station - Top 10 why to say 'no' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am trying to think of a Bull catch phrase but I'm not sure they ever gave him one!

      (and maybe that is why he fell into obscurity).

  86. Seriously, what did this cost. by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

    Blah blah blah shameless plug

    But seriously, there is no mention of what this all cost, how can it be an article telling us the best way to do stuff and then not go in to the price that was splashed out.

    With scrounged cables and second hand routers and the like i have my home network set up, 3 pcs, hifi equip etc for less than a hundred quid.

    Things like this just get my goat, was i blind or was there actually mention of the price, please help me out here, i put a starting bid in of £3000 (just shy of $5000) for the whole lot including labour, any advances or better guess's.

    im bored and tired, never use siebel data warehouse's, that that be a lesson to you

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  87. Re:well what about the nonphysical aspects of netw by brett42 · · Score: 1

    This site was pretty helpful a few years ago when I first got dsl and wanted to split it between 2 computers. They seem to have good howtos for most basic situations, though it's mostly windows oriented.

    routergod has an interesting approach to explaining somewhat complex concepts to non-technical people.

  88. Excellent article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is well worth the read if you are thinking about wiring a new house for ethernet, coax, and telephone.

    I have been researching this topic in my spare time lately, and I have to say this article is exactly what I was looking for. I really like the 19" rack idea, nice touch (maybe a bit overkill, but quite artistic).

    Newcome sounds like a great contractor to go with, this article shows how much attention they pay to detail and arriving at your goals without compromise. Unfortunatly I live in Canada and would probably have to find an alternative contractor.

    I read this article from start to finish, and to say the least I am very impressed. Heck I want to move in.

    The only thing that might bother me with a setup like this would be the colour of the faceplates, depending on the paint you use in the room, a colour matching the paint would be preferrable. But I guess you can't get everything exactly as you want it.

    I would love to try something like this in the future when I buy a home, or even just have the opportunity to attempt such an installation for someone else with a new home, provided I get the opportunity to play with it afterward :).

    Nice work, very professional and clean.

    Oh, and would anyone care to guess how much this kind of install would cost?
    Also, how much could I expect to pay for a similar 19" rack? (I have not had much opportunity to use rackmount equipment)

    Thanks!

    --
    Matthew
    u5vmpck02@sneakemail.com

  89. Note to the three clowns above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2ft walls?! Oh my God, rf0 doesn't live in the U.S[1] and now you're all confused at the concept of stone walls! Whatever will you do?

    & they say that Americans are insular. Say it ain't so!

    [1]: From the webpage. The very one linked to in rf0's details, "Goods and services provided by 65535.net (United Kingdom)." How hard was that?

  90. What REAL Real Men Do by nzyank · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't fuck around. Need a hole? Use a sledgehammer. Fast, makes a nice, neat hole that's big enough for about 115 Cat5 cables. None of this sissy shit like wireless and threading little bitty cables through little bitty holes and fastening the ends on only AFTER threading the cables.

    Worried about the landlord? Screw that! If you can afford more than one computer then you can afford to lose the security deposit.

    Oh... and then do what I did. Move to New Zealand. Mwahhahahahaha

    1. Re:What REAL Real Men Do by Wesser · · Score: 1

      And if you can afford to lose your security deposit money must not be all that important so you can probably afford to move to New Zealand and pay outlandish prices for internet connectivity! There go your extra PCs.

  91. Coax cables by svara · · Score: 1

    If you're happy with 10MBit, then using the coax cables for TV that are already in your walls is a cool thing. You can simply turn your TV-outlet into a LAN-outlet that way :) That's what I do ...

  92. Don't forget homeless by axxackall · · Score: 1

    I'd like also some advise about how to build my home from scratch (where I would be able to build my home network from scratch) as I don't have any home right now. Anyone?

    --

    Less is more !
  93. You are one of those idiots.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... that don't wear condoms. It does not feel the same, we are faithful to each other and all that self delusional rap.

    Wait until somebody wardrives in front of your house, uses your network to download some nasty stuff (kiddie porn) and you are left with trying to explain to the police how it was not you who downloaded the nasty stuff.

    And people here are suppossed to be the technically literate. Shudder....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  94. Every single wireless network... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... is in danger of being compromised.

    To assume otherwise is irreponsible.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Every single wireless network... by krel · · Score: 1

      My own network could get better range if the antenna was made out of wood. I can't see the network on the far ends of my residence with an ibook, and certainly not from outside, though i suppose someone with serious equipment could haxx0r it. Likewise, anyone smart enough and malicious enough to spend the time finding whatever subnet your network runs on, is probably also smart enough to use a de-WEP-ulator of some sort. A much more effective solution is MAC filtering, but surely there are some cases where this sort of security through obscurity is appropriate. No one can see my network, and so i assume it is safe.

      --
      karma: ouch!
  95. Re:I have a knife stuck in my snatch! HELP! by Beauty_is_the_Enemy · · Score: 0

    What'd the 1 Tampon say to the other Tampon? Nothing, they were both stuck up cunts.

  96. Four letters: by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    Wi-Fi. 'Nuff said.

    Okay, if you are a Mac user, that will cost you actually seven letters, but "Airport" sounds much nicer...

  97. My Experience by don_carnage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For what it's worth, I documented my experience wiring my home for network and phone here:

    http://spookyworld.dnsalias.com/bhjp/d/74

    Note: This article is now two years old, so technologies like wireless and gigabit ethernet were out of reach.

  98. I used a bunch of stuff to... by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    ... to get the job done.

    My cable modem is near my TV, but I wanted the computer in the other room[s], so I used HomePlug ethernet bridge to go over the electrical outlets to get there. You only get ~14Mbps but that beats the 1.5Mbps I'll never get on my cable modem. That then comes out of another Homeplug device into my linux server/firewall. From there its off to a second physical interface into a hub to which I plug my 802.11g Wireless Access Point and Sun Ultra 5. The WAP services two laptops.

    CMHPHPFSHUBWAP
    Cable Modem = CM
    HomePlug = HP
    Firewall/Server = FS


    I looked at this after I had it all and I kinda thought about whether I should have gone with an all in one WAP/Hub/Cable Modem solution, but with wanting all the stuff in separate rooms I would have more or less ended up with the same number of devices at greater cost.

    I guess it just depends whether you want all the stuff where you can plug it into one hub, don't care about wires strung across the house, or if you want it all over and plan to make it somehow look reasonable.

    I suppose I could have run CAT 5 through the walls, but I guess I still would have wanted wireless for the laptops. The big motivator for not doing this was the fear that CAT 7e would come out tomorrow and I'd 'have' to rewire. OK that's a little absurd, but not too much so, in the ever evolving tech world.

  99. CAT in a fire? by medscaper · · Score: 1
    Regular CAT in a fire can act like a fuse, moving the fire from one part of the house to another...

    Well, duh.

    If you were a cat in a fire, would you just stand there?

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  100. Re:Are you seriously arguing against plenum in hom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were going to build a house for yourself with network cable in the walls, why would you use something that burns readily and creates loads of toxic smoke?

    So you dont use carpet, or wood in your house? if you think your electrical wiring is plenum rated you either have been sniffing the fumes off of a new spool of wire too much or you are simply so misinformed that you sound like a complete idiot to your local contractor.

    your carpet, carpet pad, paint on your walls, electrical wiring, the treated wood against the concrete surfaces, as well as the regular lumber in your walls all are more of a worry in a fire than a very insignificant amount of cat-5e wiring..

    stop freaking out about a non issue, you must be one of those horribly overpaid dot-com idiots that know absolutely nothing about construction.

  101. Re:Are you seriously arguing against plenum in hom by Zathrus · · Score: 1

    Ouch... my sympathies. Had a tree fall through my roof (as in, new skylight) about 9 months ago and it sucked... a fire is far, far worse though. Hope everyone was safe and it didn't destroy anything irreplacable.

    When I was looking at the codes, the prices, and whatnot a couple years ago the plenum cable was about 5x more expensive... turning a $100 roll of cable into a $500 one. Yeah, $400 is cheap for peace of mind, but since all the sites I read stated it was unnecessary I did cheap out. I know the telephone wire I ran isn't fire resistant, and I doubt the RG-6 was either, so even if I'd run plenum a fire would have still had several other methods of transit.

  102. or in an old house... by mrgreenfur · · Score: 1

    just get some long cat 5 that matches your exterior color and staple it down the side. it's temporary, but you dont have to rip your house apart. it works well enough and if you match the colors close enough you can't see it. +10 for saving victorian houses everywhere...

  103. Heh, guess I got lucky by gosand · · Score: 1
    Remember to follow spec when making your own network cables. Running the wires straight through will cause issues (signal interference). You must have pins 3 and 6 on the same twisted pair, otherwise, the cables won't work after 30 feet or so...

    I just used a pre-made cable as my wiring guide when I ran about 50 ft in my house. They worked on the first try. That was a first in my book, I was really surprised that happened.

    Oh, here's my tip - mark the ends of each cable you run with hash marks, so you don't have to trace them back every time you forget which one is which.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  104. Not funny, INSIGHTFUL! by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep- I have CAT5 snaking from the basement up three floors. Oh sure, I've got a WAP, but thats for the laptop (so I can /. while I watch tv, or do, er, something, in the bathroom, while dumping core, uhm) my other machines need WIRES.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  105. it's not like you can electrocute yourself by vasqzr · · Score: 1


    When you run CAT5, you will be close to pipes, electrical lines, etc. There's always the potential for danger.

    While I imagine you're right about the qualifications and the illegality...one has to wonder how much of a strict qualification/certification process is necessary to the skill of drilling holes, installing face plates and laying CAT-5 cable...it's not like you can electrocute yourself with CAT-5.

  106. about that 7 foot rack.... what a waste.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, it might look cool and geeky, but as I am sure that many slashdotters will be able to attest to, many MUSIC merchandisers make quality, afforable, SLICK looking -- and short -- 19" racks.

    Granted, if you are mounting an X-Serve or anything else that is three feet deep, you might run into a few less options, but they are there.

    gear could even be mounted at an angle, with a door for soundproofing, and set up with quiet cooling rods to address heat.

    much better than that huge rack in the basement, IMHO

  107. Points in the relationship by doc_traig · · Score: 1


    The Scorecard: The Official Point System for Keeping Score in the Relationship Game is a hilarious book (seriously, it's LOL kind of stuff) which tells men what they've scored for what they've done in various relationship scenarios.

    Amazon says it's out of print, but you could probably find it in someplace like Walden's humor section...

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/08 05 054502/qid=1057068348/sr=1-69/ref=sr_1_69/002-0289 667-5450410?v=glance&s=books

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
  108. Amputation of the bathroom drain by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    I've just completed wiring my den for ethernet/phone/cable/fibre channel. Exciting. But the real fun occurred when I wished to upgrade my bathroom drain to a little 'pop plug' instead of the 'twist plug'. So I removed it, cranked on the pipe, only to find out the pipe sheared off the base... at which point I fished it out, cleaned it up, and then the trap cracked.... and the water leaked out.... so I removed that then found out that the cast iron pipe was corroded away.... - entire time taken- 4 days for a 30 minute 'valve' replacement. :)

  109. Phone jacks = Network jacks. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    My house is done the same way. CatV cable to the phone jacks, like 24 pulls throughout the house. If I want to use one for the computer network I pull off the wall connector, replace it with a RJ45 female wall connection, figure out which one on the 24 port punchdown block it is (this is the hard part) and pull that cable up, crimp on a RJ45 connection and plug it into my switch. Easy.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  110. If the drywall and insulation isn't up yet... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...by all means do it your self. Unless of course you WANT to spend too much money.

    Avoid power lines.

    A chimp could handle it in this case.

    Avoid power lines.

    You will need: a drill, a hammer, a staple gun. And the materials (wall boxes, cable, face plates).

    Avoid power lines.

    While you are at it: run some speaker cable too.

    Avoid power lines.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  111. Sing along with me by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Informative

    Orange / White
    Orange
    Green / White
    Blue
    Blue / White
    Green
    Brown / White
    Brown

    When you have the connector in your hand with the pins facing you, that is the order to line them up in (left to right.)

    I am not saying it is the only way to do it, but it is the only way I do it.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Sing along with me by GoRK · · Score: 1

      That is T568B and is the generally accepted wiring standard for single cables of 10BaseT, 100BaseTX and 1000BaseTX. I just mention this because a lot of female connectors don't have the pins correlated in order on the back of the connector, so be sure that if you're using T568B you get a jack with a T568B wiring diagram on it.

  112. Here is what I did (pictures) by the-pdm · · Score: 1
    I had my 30 year old house wired for 3 cat5e and 2 coax to every room. Except the main TV watching room where I had 3 coax run to handle the two tuner DirecTiVo and additional antenna.

    The only place we ended up with any holes was in the basement ceiling. A lot of the wiring to the 2nd floor was done through the attic since our house did not have fireblocking. Made running the cable a lot easier. Anyway, here are the pictures

  113. Why wouldn't you put in fiber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're building a new house, why the hell wouldn't you put in fiber? It wouldn't be much more compared to your mortgage.

    If you really want to plan for the future, fiber is the best way to go.

  114. I would love an article... by chrysrobyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would love an article that deserved the title "Building A (Serious) Home Network From Scratch". This isn't it.

    I want to see how to open my wall with the least destruction. How to snake it up to the attic. How to snake it up to the plywood under the carpet in the second floor. Then, how to patch drywall.

    I want to see how to effectively route wires from all over the house to a punchdown block in a closet. I don't need to see ethernet cable connectors every step of the way, we're talking about a serious network. PUNCH DOWN BLOCKS! There is, of course, a discussion of conduit. People who have done it and found a need, along with a few sentences about people who have spent (how long does it take?) a few hours to do it and found it to be a waste of time. Eventually, because it's only a Home Network, we probably just go with wires and no conduit, but we've at least thought about conduit and feel better for it.

    This Serious Home Network probably also has jacks to tie in the neighbors for bandwidth sharing or LAN gaming, or possibly some other fancy stuff, but we're not wasting our page views on how to cut down a rack. We can figure that stuff out.

    1. Re:I would love an article... by dmforcier · · Score: 1

      I brought the star configuration back to a small room on one end of the basement. In order to get there all the cables had to go behind a nest of air ducts, over a finished room, and around a jog in the wall. Solution? CONDUIT Not wimpy-assed lv conduit, either, but 2" 600V industrial PVC. The biggest stuff they had. Bolted it to the joists above the finished room and jogged it around the corner with some elbows. It was easily the most labor-saving effort of the project! It is much easier to pull through conduit than through a crowded environment.

      Used a snake to run a pull string. Tied off both ends with wooden handles, and pulled nearly 1000' of cat5 and coax through the ceiling without having to get on a ladder. (Did have to get on a ladder to feed down into the junction box and drill up into the walls.)

      So don't dismiss conduit. In the right places it can make life much easier.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me!
    2. Re:I would love an article... by ediron2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My background happens to hit all of these 'physical' issues just right: I've done construction, construction management (a great excuse to watch EVERY trade for a few hours at a time to learn from their decades of hands-on experience), and more computer/network programming and infosec work than the others combined. I've done commercial retrofits of a building for electrical code, including bending a few thousand feet of conduit.

      So, at home I've done a hybrid of everything mentioned in this thread. While I'm sure there are better ways on a lot of these pointers, my ways worked and didn't even leave me in trouble with the wife or heckled by appearance-attentive friends. Incidentally, all this is geared toward appearance/resale asthetics.

      Graceful holes in sheetrock:

      1 - Never use a hammer for drywall unless you're doing demolition. There's a skinny tapered saw made for small cuts in drywall. That's the best $5-15 you'll ever spend.
      2 - Save the square you cut out of the wall. The alternative (cutting a new piece of drywall) takes forever. If the square is more than a few inches on a side, use short lengths of 2" x 1/4" wood (what I've always called lath) and screws to reattach this piece (the lath hides under the sheetrock, inside the wall... attach lath across the gap, then lay the piece in and attach it to the lath) before going to work with joint compound (sheetrocker's mud) for your patch.
      3 - Too little mud is better than too much. Plan on 3 or so layers to get done. After the mud is firm (an hour, less for quickdry (a special mud)) use a broad blade (5" to 8") to knock down the high spots, a cheese-grater or coarse sandpaper to further feather it down, and then let it dry. Fill/sand/fill/sand until the surface feels flat and looks good. Find a pro and watch 'em work, if your technique sucks. It isn't rocket science, it isn't art, but it isn't trivial. But the raw materials are cheap enough you could create a test-wall and practice until you understood how to hide seams, etc. Oh, and most contractors thin the mud a titch with water and never use mud with lumps. Again, it's cheap... toss and start over with new mud.

      Pick your battles:

      Where I thought I wanted the soho switch for my network to be just wasn't as practical as where I put it, when I realized how many nasty wire-pulls I faced. It bugs me that I can't glance at net status LED's from my office, but the six times per year it matters I figure were worth not running all the wires back to that. Besides, I need the exercise.

      I carefully placed my network connections. Wire's cheap (so go the long way if easier), and some rooms tolerate exposed wire (a garage, the laundry room, along the baseboard in closets). Further, a single 12" x 12" hole in one closet wall allowed me room to do a vertical drill-hole downward into the garage, then drag wire up and put a lead out into that closet and onto an ideal spot in the adjacent room. That way if I didn't like my sheetrock repairs, they were in a seldom-seen place.

      There were a few spots that I felt would be cool locations to have a spigot to just surf... dining table, the patio, and a living room. All three were never going to allow an easy connection, so I've got a wireless AP. But where broadband matters (for my ReplayTV, my work PC's and a file sharing/media PC), switched cat-5 was worth the effort.

      As for Wireless vulnerabilities: To secure 11b to an acceptable level, I have WEP turned on, defaults changed, and I change the WEP key every few weeks. Since my reading of the WEP vulnerabilities seems to point toward a need for nearly a gig of passive data capture, I figure I've got things adequately secured for my personal data. I would not recommend this for a corporate setting, but for home office use, I'm more secure than 90% of users. Just because I do infosec, I also configured firewalls to put the wireless PC's into a very narrow DMZ of their own. They can surf, and they can print. Frankly, most people's knowledge of in

    3. Re:I would love an article... by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Quite possibly you are semi-related to someone that does that for a living. You should ask them.

      Hint #1: Running Cat5 is very similar to running audio cable for a sound system.

      I get your point, though. It ain't that informative of an article.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  115. Easy way by Leadmagnet · · Score: 1

    I think it would be best to look towards the future and use CAT6 cables for network and phone. I would probably use a all-in-one cable like http://smarthome.com/8682.html it has (2)CAT6 / (2) RG6 Coax / (2) Fibre all in one tight jacket for easy pulling, even if you don't use the fibre I would run it anyways and just not put on the fibre connectors

    --
    http://www.leadmagnet.50megs.com
  116. I helped a friend do this last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was fun and pretty easy, even for first-timers. Especially fun was fishing the cables in the attic with over 90 degree summer heat outside.

  117. I know what u mean by XSforMe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1 Gb Ethernet, Cat 6 cabling, 19 inch rack? I know big corporations whose network is put to shame by this setup.

    Still, I would be looking for something more in the "ideal" home network, such as a POTS to IP-telephony gateway, and a cable/air TV - video server gateway. Why waste effort cabling an ugly coax and telephone cable when everything could run on top of the ether? This would also simplify the plate setup as his contracter suggested. I know that IP telephones are still expensive, but as I see it, money is not an issue in this setup.

    Another point, I hope he OWNS this house. Can you imagine his landlord saying "well, I don't think I'll renew your contract next year."... GGHHHAAAAAA!!!!

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
    1. Re:I know what u mean by kcurrie · · Score: 1

      Still, I would be looking for something more in the "ideal" home network, such as a POTS to IP-telephony gateway ..do it right now, with a Cisco ATA-186 and Vonage IP phone service. Works great. The ATA-186 is free with Vonage service, although I think you can probably buy one new for $150.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
  118. Sunny, Bankrupt California by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    We don't have a lot of basements here, but we do have crawl spaces. Better than a slab, I guess.

    I spent hours shuffling around and lying in that tiny space, hooking up cable and tacking it to the structure. The payoff was that the only holes inside the house were for the wall jack. I came up inside the walls from underneath.

    I got to know the wildlife down there very well (there's less than you might imagine). I still trade emails with some Black Widows I met.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  119. Hah. Your network is weak! :P by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Check this and this out! Takes up a good portion of the kitchen! :P

    AND.. my girlfriend doesn't mind it at all. She hits up oldnavy.com three or four times a week and all is good. Oh, and having everything in the kitchen like that is great for when you need recipes.com one evening. :)

    1. Re:Hah. Your network is weak! :P by orim · · Score: 1

      Is that a Mac I see in the bottom right corner? Heretic!!!!

      --
      "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
    2. Re:Hah. Your network is weak! :P by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's a Mac OS X Server. :P~ So around this place, that should be acceptable. ;)

  120. Nearly free if you're building a house anyway by jet_silver · · Score: 1

    If you are building a house this is so cheap and easy that you'd be crazy not to do it - after the framing is done but before the drywall goes in. My house has eight Cat 5e runs that all end up in a little closet where the router and the servers are. It was incredibly inexpensive to put in. The drywall guys charge next to nothing for the wall penetrations (maybe $3 per extra hole). The cost to me was about $200 for all the bits and pieces plus about an hour per run (45 minutes to install each one and 15 minutes to wire and test).

    Code compliance, even in strict Santa Cruz county (.ca.us) was not an issue except the wall plates had to be on before occupancy. A blank wall plate meets code so you can leave all the cables unterminated, stick on a blank plate, and then go around and install the jacks whenever you want.

  121. POTS to IP-telephony gateway by dpilot · · Score: 1

    How practical is this?
    Are you speaking of a general IPPOTS that perhaps others could use, or a gateway just for your home, so you could drop Baby Bell or Long Distance POTS?
    Can you give a pointer on the general topic that won't show in the first few terms of a google search?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:POTS to IP-telephony gateway by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      How practical is this?
      1. As you said it, it would allow you to drop babybell (at least on selected numbers), and hence save you a couple bucks in your LD calls.
      2. It would kill the need to do the POTS cabling and plating.
      3. It would allow you to connect your telephones to any ether port.
      4. It would allow for an intercom system within the house and probably serve also as a doorbell.

      Are you speaking of a general IPPOTS that perhaps others could use, or a gateway just for your home
      Not sure what you mean by IPPOTS. The idea would be a IP telephony-POTS gateway for me to reach the world and the world to use to reach me.

      Can you give a pointer on the general topic that won't show in the first few terms of a google search?
      Something like this might suite the bill.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  122. Re:Are you seriously arguing against plenum in hom by scaramush · · Score: 1

    If you were going to build a house for yourself with network cable in the walls, why would you use something that burns readily and creates loads of toxic smoke?

    Heh....Mental image:

    The AlphaGeek's house is on fire. Flames are shooting up the walls and out of the broken windows. The fishtank is boiling and the cat's on fire.

    Where is AlphaGeek? He's standing in the middle of the inferno, clawing at the walls screaming "My wires! My wires!".

    Yeesh.

    --
    "...you can steal my woman, but you ain't done nuthin' smart."
  123. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes (2 pair vs 4 pair) by Tower · · Score: 1

    Heck, you can run 10BaseT over lamp wire and galvanized pipe if you need to, for shortish runs. Things tend to get a little more picky at the higher speeds, with gigabit getting really annoying.

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  124. Wireless baby wireless! by bitshifter0101 · · Score: 1

    Wireless baby wireless!

  125. Overkill -- NOT! by tarsi210 · · Score: 1
    Folks, the word that drives me nuts in computer technology is the word, "Overkill". Let me clue all you in -- there is NO such thing as 'overkill'!

    You will use it. You will be glad you did it. 640K is enough for anybody. 2GB of RAM is a lot...no, you'll use it. 20GB drive? How will I ever fill it? Trust me, you'll use it.

    So, from my experiences in networking my house, I offer these tips:
    • The proper number of drops to install in a room is How Many You Think You Need times 2.
    • When pulling cable, the number of cables to pull is How Many Ports You Have times 2.
    • The number of ports on your hub and patch panel is How Many Ports You Have times 2. (seeing a pattern?)
    • YES use a patch panel. It makes life SO much easier later on.
    • YES use a punchdown block for incoming telco. That way you can wire to your patch panel and use patch cables to change phone locations. Very, very slick.
    • Make sure you pull a string with each cable run, too. Beats the hell out of smashing up a wall.
    • Pull other cords while you're at it. I pulled speaker wire to every port (almost) and now I have a house-wide music system.
    • If you're installing in old walls (not new construction), find the "old work" electrical boxes and put them in the wall. They have screwdown clamps that hold onto the lathe/sheetrock and enable you to have a box without a lot of work and mess.
    • Get yourself a mess of cable coax one-nail staples. They're meant for holding 75ohm coax but work just as slick as nipples for CATX. Invaluable when you have a lot of rafters/joists to hook cable to.
    • If you have a workbench in another building (garage) or such, wire it up to the network. I have my garage online now and can do all my major computer work/assembly out there and still be online and have my network resources.
    • Racks can be bought, or you can just make one out of wood, like I did. It works well, you can screw into it, and it's stable enough to hold my stuff. No, it doesn't look as cool, but if you're on a budget, well...
    • Tools Absolutely Needed: RJ-45 crimper, RJ-45 tester, wire stripper, needlenose pliers, fish tape and reel, pinchers or snips, screwdriver, punch tool. These you'll need over and over, just get them now, save yourself much forehead smackage.
    Installation suggestion: Have a wiring party. I did my house like this, 13 people on a Saturday, beer, pop, and lunch provided. It was great. The organization took awhile, people were milling around for awhile, but once we started making holes and pulling, things got together. Send groups of two or three off to do a room or a drop or two together, it's better to work in teams. Makes for a very fun and productive day.

    A home network, when running, kicks ass. There's nothing like having friends over and just handing them a patch cable and telling them to reach behind their chair and plug in. Do it right, spend some time on it, and it'll work out well.
  126. Woefully Incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where was the section on running the cable over the roof? The proper way to run cat5 out a window and still be able to close it?

  127. Whatever.... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    Gee, I wish I had a huge site on the internet so I could get discounts on my network setup by posting interviews with the contractor. Whatever. That is such utter bullshit. Every corner they went by they were going with high end this and that. 48 fucking port switch in a HOUSE? 6 foot modified rack in the basement?! Unrealistic as all hell. Who can afford shit like that without getting kickbacks from the companies you are pimping on the website?

    Real geeks scrounge equipment from wherever they can get it, and make it do what they want it to. They don't throw as much money as possible at a problem. My cat5 cabling running across the baseboards is a badge of pride. The salvaged DEC 5000 Alpha Server is another source of geek-drool in my house. I got it for free, and I put it to use. It is now my firewall, file server, mp3 streamer, and whatever else I can figure out how to make it do (too bad openmosix is for x86 only).

    If you're so anally retentive that you can't stand to see 6 feet of cat5 running across a baseboard (neatly stapled so you don't trip over it), then your priorities in life are whacked out. We live in a shitty world, and you whine about color schemes. "If we don't want to use them for phone lines in the future, we COULD use the cat5 as 100tx network lines, but then it WOULDN'T MATCH THE FREAKING COLOR SCHEMES!" Wow. They were worried about not having the pretty white wires matching the pretty blue wires.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  128. thank god by dkeav · · Score: 1

    thats why god invented spackle

  129. Me too. by bellings · · Score: 1

    Last night, I installed a serious home network. I went to best buy and picked up an 802.11b home router. I went home, plugged it in, changed the password, and turned on MAC filtering and WEP.

    It took me about an hour total and $70, including drive time. It would have been quicker, but for some reason I decided to turn on MAC filtering and WEP from a wireless connection (I was, uhh... testing the configuration utilities default security... really...).

    Now, granted... his network is better today. In three years, though, I'm going to upgrade to a network that's much better than his current one. And it will probably cost me another $70.

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  130. Structured wiring by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    It's called structured wiring and you can find a lot of information if you Google that phrase. Here is what Bob Vila has to say on Structured Wiring. Typical structured wiring contains two runs of RG-6 and two runs of Cat 6 (or 5e). One run of Cat 6 can be used for two phone lines. The other run can be used for a home network. As for the RG-6, some cable and satellite companies require two runs of cable. Otherwise, you can use one for a home monitoring system.

    You would typically run the cables in a home run, or star topology. All cables run from a central location (at a Central Wiring Panel to the intended location. But you don't need to connect each outlet.

    You can also run multiple wires to a room, to account for remodeling. For example, let's say your living room has north, south, east, and west walls. Due to the furniture location, you want to connect your TV to the south wall. But you pre-wire to all the walls, just leaving them unconnected. If you decide to move the couch to the other side of the room and move the TV to the north side, you merely go to the central wiring panel, disconnect the south wall from the Cable TV and connect the north wall to the Cable TV.

  131. I can't read THG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the editorial and Tom's Hardware have something in common: they're both unreadable in my browser. Tom's Hardware has the table on the right overlapping the articles, and amdmb's articles are cropped and won't scroll horizontally.(*) (Tom's Hardware at least is editable to readability by Mozilla 1.3 (**) due to it not employing iframes in its markup. To read the editorial, I have to read around the markup in the source.)

    (*) I do use a client-side stylesheet that overrides fixed-width tables and cells.
    (**) Nothing newer will install on this company-controlled Redhat 6.2 system.

    1. Re:I can't read THG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's their Sponsored Link in the first table that's eating up the window space causing the subsequent tables to run atop each other. Apparently the Mozilla engine has difficulty with tables rendering side-by-side and allocating space for flowing content.

      I find these stylesheet rules are effective at stopping this without losing the self-adjusting tables:

      /* Tom's Hardware Sponsored Links */
      a[href*="ad.tomshardware"] { display: none ! important }
      font[size] small font[size="1"] { display: none ! important }

      I mean, really! Font size 1 inside small? Markup like that deserves to be suppressed.

  132. You laugh but... by Aexia · · Score: 1

    That essentially what my roommates and I have at our house. Except we used push pins to get cables up and out of the way.

    Problem: Shitty wiring in the house prevents the DSL modem from working reliably inside the house.

    Solution: Open up the phone box in the garage, disconnect a couple things and plug the DSL modem directly into it. It's not like we use the landline for voice anyways.

    Problem: The DSL modem is in the garage. The router and all the computers are on the other side of the house.

    Solution: Run 100 feet of bright blue cable along the top of the walls and ceilings with push pins through the garage, the kitchen, the foyer, the hallway and into the office.

    Problem: Not all the computers are in the office.

    Solution: Run more cable; use more push pins.

    The setup works great and amazingly enough, people don't notice the cable. You'd think blue cable going around off-white walls and ceilings would be noticeable, but apparently not.

  133. Convincing the POSSLQ. by MrChuck · · Score: 1
    I dunno, the girl just got a 17" powerbook. Now she wants GigE to the machine rack downstairs. But she's been on me to pull a wire for her audrey to the kitchen for a while.

    So show your wife you love her and get her a laptop with GigE :)

    Run a cable to the computer.
    Wow! That's really ugly. Here honey, let me run some outlets in the wall for you. I know I don't have to, but it's because I love you.

    Otoh, maybe I started out on easier footing: two of the NeXTs, the Alpha and the 16port switch ARE hers. She's accepted that two machine room racks are the best solution for the computers and she understands that the best way to maintain several machines is through the 16 port terminal server. The 110 punchdown block for the patch panel is her idea. Hell, she's happy to log into the house BSD box and type
    "heyu turn den lights on"
    when the X10 control is out of sight.

    But as an ex-architect (the real kind, not the computer "systems decorator" kind), she despises ugly. The CAT5 across the room at the rental was barely tolerated, but the wireless was welcomed.

    "ripping holes in walls" is TEMPORARY, as a general goal. Making walls not have holes is the long term goal. Perhaps if you start small, you can demonstrate that after a lot of dusty drywall, you end up with a pretty wall again. And that your patch panel need not be 3 feet up in the middle of the dining room with wires hanging out.

  134. Hardware alternatives by dmforcier · · Score: 1

    The article was a bit (well, a lot) weak, but the link to Siemons was of interest.

    The line about choosing the same manufacturer at both ends of the run is bogus. The integrated junction box idea is not. I think the Siemons boxes look very useful.

    But when I installed I rejected the Siemons plates (and terminators) for exactly the reason that they liked them: the labelling. I wanted my plates to be as inconspicuous as possible. First off, you don't have to label the wallplate end; a simple layout map (and labels) at the junction box will do the job. If you must label, they can just as easily go behind the plate. To distinguish the phone and Ethernet (both cat5) I simply used an odd color for the Ethernet terminator.

    For my own project I chose to go with the Leviton QuickPort line. Back then I had to go to a commercial supply to get it. On a larger project I still would, but now Home Depot carries most of what a HomeNet project needs. The Leviton catalog is pretty informative, too. Here's a link to their integrated network product page.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me!
  135. Printer-friendly version, Part 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article Info
    Building A Home Network From Scratch
    Created: June 30, 2003
    By: David Stellmack
    Category: Networking
    Summary:No matter if you choose a wired or wireless network, planning and flexibility are the keys in getting a sucessful installtion that you will be happy with. We were lucky enough to select the right contractor who helped us achieve our goals and exceed or expectations. The result was a state of the art infrastucture that we will not outgrow anytime soon.

    Intro (image)

    The Ins and Outs of Building a Home Network

    With interest rates at an all-time low in the U.S., many Americans are now able to build or buy their first home or, if they are already a homeowner, to upgrade to something better. Buying or building a home offers those who are technology-minded the opportunity to consider the integration of home connectivity up-front. Many new, custom-built homes now offer some level of basic home connectivity as an option; but this is a new phenomenon. Considering that the Internet has become a mainstream feature of our collective lifestyle in just a few short years, unless the home you are buying is fairly new it is likely that you are pretty much left to your own devices when it comes to networking.

    First, you have to consider the pipe into your house. Normally, your choices are either DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) or Cable modem; but as many have discovered to their dismay after they have signed on the dotted line of the purchase contract, neither of these options may be available. Generally speaking, the further the home is located from a metropolitan area, the fewer options for Internet connectivity there are. While satellite and ISDN options do exist, they are probably the least desirable solutions.

    While we don't suggest that Internet connectivity options should outweigh other factors in a home purchase, if high-speed Internet access is important to you, then it is wise to do some basic investigation as to what options are available at your home location. An hour spent on the telephone with local cable and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) may make the difference between satisfaction and regret with a home long after the sale has concluded.

    Wired or Wireless?

    No discussion of home networking would be complete without a brief discussion of wired and wireless solutions. While wireless solutions offer perhaps the most convenient solution for many home computer users, they may not present the best solution.

    "Wireless" is the current buzzword these days, and it seems every hardware product vendor is touting his or her particular ability to provide it. The word "wireless" evokes visions of being able to wander around various rooms in your home or even outside without the network line that tethers home users to a single place. However, depending on the version of wireless you select and/ or are able to afford, your results might not measure up to "manna" grade, or even a mediocre grade, over time. The physical construction, design and layout of your house can affect whether or not wireless is a good solution, and you may have to invest in multiple access points (in infrastructure mode) linked together via Ethernet to provide coverage for wireless access to the various locations within your house.

    If wireless coverage isn't an issue, a more important factor might be connection speed. From our testing, many 802.11a 54-Mbit solutions certainly don't have the amount of signal penetration that is required for wireless access in many multi-story homes and office environments. For example, if you have computer systems in the kids' room on the second floor and your family room is located on the first floor some distance away, you may or may not be able to achieve a connection from both places, depending where the access point i

  136. Re:Printer-friendly version, Part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Project Shifts into High Gear

    The first step was to place Post-It notes in each location of the plates. As you will remember, we determined the four standard plate configurations that we would be using and which connections each plate offered. We examined our drawing of the plate locations and placed additional Post-It notes on each wall for each of the locations that had the plate type number and the connection number written on it.

    (image)
    We used standard Post-It notes stuck to the wall to indicate the proposted locations for the jacks.

    Labeling each of the connections with a number is very important. Doug created a method where each and every plate had an assigned number. Multiple types of the same type of connection were labeled with a letter. For example, a plate was numbered 1008 in the first floor office. In the data patch panel you would find a connection that was labeled 1008A. If this plate had a second data connection it would be labeled 1008B. The 1008 number carries over to the voice and coax as well, with these being labeled using the same number scheme. As long as you know the plate number, you can find the connection quickly within the patch panels for the voice, data and coax.

    The Project Shifts into High Gear, Continued

    Once all of the locations were selected and labeled, we then needed to find a pathway to get the cable fished into the existing walls. The challenge was running the cable to the second floor, as there was no direct access from the termination point in the basement to the second floor. The first floor was fairly easy because we had ample access provided by the full basement and crawl spaces under both the first floor office and family room. The termination point that was located in my basement lab was being built from the ground up, so we had the ability to run the cables during the framing process prior to hanging the drywall.

    (image)
    When you have to pull multiple cables at the same time, the best thing to do is tape the ends of the cables, as shown in the picture.

    Getting the cabling to the second floor can present a challenge in any installation. Depending on the age of your home and its design, this task can be more or less difficult. Doug examined several options for doing this while keeping the cabling inside the house. Many installers like to take the easy way out and will want to run the cable outside with some sort of casing like Panduit, for example, and bring it into the attic this way. but is this the way that you would want it done? I don't think so. Perhaps in older homes this is the only option, but it is NOT the preferred method. The better option is to take advantage of existing raceways, ducts, and areas that can be used to route the cabling.

    In our case, Doug tapped the knowledge of Newcome team member Jeff Harris, who has over ten years of experience installing alarm systems into pre-existing homes. Jeff spent considerable time examining both our basement and the attic to determine the best solution for running the wiring up to the second floor. Jeff also had to consider building codes and dos and don'ts for running cable up to the second floor. Fortunately, Doug found an old coax cable from a previous cable TV installation that helped clue him in as to how to do this.

    The Project Shifts into High Gear, Continued

    While it might seem easier to merely snag one of these coax cable or phone wires and tie a pull string to it to run the cable up, this is not really the proper method. The reason is that these cables are often roughed in during the framing and electrical install portion of the construction of the home, and often the wires are stapled to the framing or studs. Thus, when you pull on these cables they go nowhere. Doug and Jeff determined that the coax cable for the cable TV in the front b

  137. Wireless 2mbit linksys. by generic · · Score: 1

    I just built a new home and bought a linksys wap. It works great, I get good coverage from the basement to the second floor and even down my driveway. I was going for cheap since all of my machines are 1ghz and under. With the cable modem and a BSD firewall life is good, I can surf from the back deck, watch people fish in the lake accross the field and drink a beer.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  138. KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid by ethanms · · Score: 1

    I've read the entire article... I've read many comments here...

    He needs a 48 port switch? Give me a break! Not to mention that he's added those 6-port in-wall switches in a few locations...

    I have 4 PC users in my 2200sqft house, I ran cat5 to each PC location from the basement... they all connect to an 8-port switch (in the basement), which connects to a (now) wireless router which connects to my cable modem. I have a PC or two in the basement also connected to the 8 port switch.

    I have a couple of laptops which are wireless almost exclusively at work and home...

    I think the total cost, soup to nuts, not including the 10-15hrs of labor I put in over a weekend to wire it up, cost me $300.

    From the looks of it, this guy spent between $2-4k getting this all done...

    The only thing he has going for him is that he has the ability to very quickly scale his network, but considering it's a residential install to meet the needs of a handful of users (at most) it's a complete waste of time.

    And what's with him using 3Com almost exclusively?

  139. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes (2 pair vs 4 pair) 100T by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

    I do use twisted pairs. Most cat5 cable comes with 4 pairs. You only _need_ 2 pairs (definitely twisted though) for a 100T connection. Some 100T network cards don't even have connections to the other two pairs of pins. OK, so 100T may not be considered a "serious network" but you can run 2 connections on 1 cat5 cable.

  140. There is only one way to build a SERIOUS home net. by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

    Sigh, if only my 54G wireless card had linux drivers...

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
  141. How did wireless work out for you? by tit0.c · · Score: 1

    I also live in a country were we use REAL walls, not those cardboard walls in the U.S. I ran some CAT5 to my bedroom but I`ve got a laptop that needs wireless.How did it work for you with brick walls and stuff?

  142. http://www.swhowto.com by ergean · · Score: 1

    http://www.swhowto.com

    After reading the article I started googling for cat5 and t568a/b and I found this site. It seems quite useful and nicely structured.

  143. practical tips (or, Stellmack is a fool) by GodLived · · Score: 1

    This was a ridiculous and non-helpful article. Basically, Stellmack took a simple weekend job and exploded it into a major home renovation project, complete with project managers, subcontractors, rackmounts, and more. It is unbelievable. I'll cover a few points because nobody is reading this and I need to move on to saner pastures.

    First, 100Mb does not mean 100Mb to the Internet. He places emphasis on future proofing, but is seemingly unaware that no matter how fast the inside wire is, it's only 10Mb MAX coming in from cable modem (and only 128Kb going out, 256kb if you buy the business version).

    Security and interference are generally the #1 concerns of wireless, not speed. If you do wireless (which he did anyway!), it should only be because you are not willing/unable based on your lease from doing this. Security was not emphasized enough in the article.

    If building a new house, have the plumber (that's right, the plumber, the only one qualified to do this by code) run a 2nd floor conduit from the basement to the attic. It's basically a 1+3/4" PVC pipe initially capped on both ends for fire safety reasons. When they installed my alarm system (w/2nd floor smoke detector), the guys danced with joy that I had this, and it saved them about an hour.

    For contractors, he mentioned having a hard time finding them. Consider security alarm vendors; they deal with CAT 3 all over the place, and would be glad to have the business.

    If you're doing this for real, you don't have to contract: Home Depot sells Ideal products that do the job and give you combo jacks, RJ-45, and the phone installation.

    Note that Cat 6 is NOT future proof. My guess is he will have to string fiber anyway eventually. Go with 5e for now. Also, the phone only needs CAT3. Anything higher is overkill. Cat3 is about half the cost of Cat5.

    On a different subject, the picture of Stellmack's nearly-finished basement - I'm concerned that bottom piece of drywall only has a single row of screws in it. Should have a duoble row like the top one. Also, why are your jacks more than 2' off the floor? Be aware of codes.

    Further ridiculousness includes "torpedo leveling the wall plates to make them even" [termination heading for home stretch] Nobody, and I mean NOBODY torpedo levels a wall plate. What a farce.

    Note on bolting the rack to the floor: the contractor is using a hammer drill with a tungsten carbide bit, and this isn't pointed out in the article. Also, older concrete is very hard to drill into, hammer or no. This step is not to be taken lightly. Also, hammer drills can make about 100dB of noise in confined spaces, so better wear ear protection. I used one to do this and the noise hurt like hell. Also, if you have old concrete, plan on getting only 4 HOLES PER DRILLBIT before the bit breaks or grinds down. At $4/bit, this is a costly proposition. (I once tried to anchor wall plates via concrete bolts, and a contractor chuckled and said, "use liquid nails.")

    My verdict: Stellmack is a fool with too much money on his hands. He could have done the job more simply, with better results, more personal satisfaction, had the job completed more quickly, and saved a ton of money. Though he doesn't mention it, with the amount and involvement of the contractors, the time taken to do "interviews" (no kidding, he INTERVIEWED the contractor!) I'm guessing his project cost about $7,500 including equipment. Might be more like $10k.

    I guess that, based on the inclusion of the interview and the sycophantic praise of the contractor, Stellmack received some credit for the contractor's services in exchange for the publicity by means of this article. The article's message is that you need a contractor to do this kind of thing, that there's no way you can get it right unless you treat this like a huge project, and you'd better call this particular contractor.

    I heard bad things about Tom's, now I'm beginning to witness them firsthand.

  144. Re:Cat5 Cabling Woes (2 pair vs 4 pair) 100T by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I am aware of that. However the other pairs are used for grounding to help with signal interference. 100bt will work just fine over phone wire for short distances however over longer distances you'll find it simply does not work. Switching to Cat-3, which is 8-wire TP will get you longer distances, but not as long as Cat-5 which uses superior twisting.

    Noise and interference are very real problem with digital data that most people don't tend to think about since they often don't deal with distances and/or environment where it can become problematic. Also, it is perfectly possable to have a connection that works, just poorly. A split connection like the one you speak of, which I have seen before, often sufferes from a high level of errors and therefore decreased throughput.

  145. Re:Are you seriously arguing against plenum in hom by Kenneth · · Score: 1

    Ouch... my sympathies. Had a tree fall through my roof (as in, new skylight) about 9 months ago and it sucked... a fire is far, far worse though. Hope everyone was safe and it didn't destroy anything irreplacable.

    Thanks. It wasn't too bad. The kitchen was a total loss, but that's rather nice now. Fortunatly we got it out before it could spread beyond that.

    Actually not to get too far off topic here, but the fire wasn't the worst part. Sure there was the shock, the loss, and the massive inconvinence, but the very worst part was dealing with the contractors when rebuilding. They did a shotty job. They took forever, overcharged, said they'd come right over and not show up for a week. If I had been making the decisions I would have fired them, but I wasn't making the decisions.

    The insurence companies are just as bad. Ours told us we HAD to use that particular contractor or they wouldn't pay. I knew this to be false, but when your house burns you aren't thinking too clearly. We should have gotten a lawyer. At least I'm paying him to be on MY side, even if he has about the same ethics as the insurence company or contractor.

    When I was looking at the codes, the prices, and whatnot a couple years ago the plenum cable was about 5x more expensive... turning a $100 roll of cable into a $500 one.

    Well, that IS a bit pricy, Although I can't afford a serious home network either way. It is true you can get away with a lot, and not have problems, and I doubt the regular wire would truly cause a problem. Still once you've had it happen, you get FAR more paranoid than you were. Kind of a fire extinguisher or two in every room, a smoke detector in every room, walls made of shuttle heat shield tiles[1] etc.

    [1] O.K. maybe not.

    --
    There is a civil war coming in the United States. Remember which side has most of the guns