Slashdot Mirror


Finally: Broadband for the Commodore 64

GP writes "Now even die-hard Commodore 64 users are able to enjoy the benefits of broadband Internet connectivity. A newly announced Ethernet card together with the Contiki operating system lets you surf the web, send e-mail, host web sites with the built-in web server, and soon even play LAN games on your good old Commodore 64! All this with a computer that is old enough to drink."

442 comments

  1. Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can play Tank! With my friends in Iraq!

    1. Re:Wahoo! by coug_ · · Score: 1

      We already played that game... it wasn't a pretty sight...

    2. Re:Wahoo! by falzer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, now Junis in Afghanistan can get high-speed Internet access!

    3. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wonderd what kind of people write these useless posts under useless articles on /.

      Now I know.

    4. Re:Wahoo! by ScottGant · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Great, news like this today just hits home the problem I'm going to face next week.

      I have to move. My wife has decided to move back to St. Joe Michigan to be with her family...so that means going back to the stone age in terms of the Internet.

      For years I've had broadband...before Comcast it was AT&T...before that it was @home...before that it was ISDN. 8 years of living without having to go to Dial-up.

      Now I have to go back to basic dial-up. Trust me, there is no other way...it's a wonder that they even have electricity in this backwards po-dunk town...much less broadband. It seems I'm going backwards in connectivity. I'm thinking of just giving the whole thing up as I just don't want to go back to waiting for everything.

      Probably won't see Slashdot or any other web sites for a long long time. So to all my friends out there, farewell.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    5. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No satellite?

      Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

      It's been 7 seconds since you hit 'reply'!

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

    6. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I know. then tell us, damn it!

    7. Re:Wahoo! by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      So why did you agree to go?

      You're entitled to your lifestyle brother. And you DID have a say in the decision, whether she chose to recognize it or not.

      I'm sure her family is important to her and all, but come on, you should give up your life and things that make you happy just because of it. (And I'm sure you're losing more than broadband).

      What good does her 'being there' in the same town do for those folks anyway?

      This pisses me off a bit, because my wife tries crap all the time to talk me into moving nearer to her co-depandant, loser sister. But I make a stand for my vision of my life.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    8. Re:Wahoo! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Start by investing in some wireless. Make it a simple open AP, with a nice high tower (since everyone will have high TV antennas, etc already). Put a few pringles can antenna up and see who tries to connect. Get out and meet the closest neighbors and see if there are any other geeks, or teenagers desperate for kazaa/pr0n/etc. If you discover a user base, it may be cost worthy to do a co-op on a leased line for bandwidth and a community wirless network to share it.

      Or just wait. I've just gotten DSL and I'm out in the boonies (10+ miles to nearest stoplight or cable TV outlet in all directions). Until they upgraded the Big Box down the line to provide DSL services, it provided me with a nice 24kbps connection with a crapload of packetloss.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    9. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On behalf of the entire male gender, bravo for taking that stand. I don't know if it's genetic, or just cultural conditioning, but that familial clustering so many of them love to do is one of my biggest pet peeves. Especially when she complains about where you're living. "No shit this place sucks. Do I need to remind you that you're the one who dosn't want to move someplace nicer?"

    10. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever think of a Direcway 2-way satellite connection? No good for gaming, but really fast for everything else.

    11. Re:Wahoo! by anagama · · Score: 4, Funny


      Might I suggest a solution to this broadband problem.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    12. Re:Wahoo! by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

      Here's the Slashdot story upon which the parent post is based. It was a bs "human interest story" posted by everyone's favourite editor, JonKatz.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    13. Re:Wahoo! by PD · · Score: 0

      That's redundant. I already posted that comment, but it's toplevel and all the way at the end of the comments.

    14. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the post dates.

  2. My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by LinuxMan · · Score: 1, Redundant

    A C64 will hardly be able to push 2kbps, which makes broadband seem useless to me. It would seem that beyond the "coolness factor," the most realistic thing to do would be to just simply run it through your PC using serial, and save a buck. Maybe if we can just figure out how to overclock a C64 to 250mhz, we could saturate a T1!

    The Protocols

    1. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative
      My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps

      Then you haven't configured the thing properly. I used a 386DX-20 as a firewall for a cable modem for a couple of years and it had no problem with >1024kbps.

    2. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by turgid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps

      Really? In my day we used to have 386/33 machines with 4 10Mbit ethernet cards running Novell Netware, and several large hard disks. You're not running Windows, by any chance are you?

    3. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most home computers of that era, like C64 or ZX Spectrum wrote their data on tape with ca 1500-2000 bit/s by default. Many games (originally packaged) used their own loading routines with speeds up to 4000 bps in order to load faster. You could go higher over 6000 bps, but the risk of getting read errors was too high.

      The important thing is, the read/write routines were CPU-timed, they used short loops to precisely time the moment to switch between 1 and 0 on output. These loop have a natural precision limit of 1 loop, which would be x CPU cycles (7 on Z80??? or 10? I don't remember correctly). You could reach maybe 100000 bps (theoretically) with this principle, but practically you'd have too many errors.

    4. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to disagree. If a 486 can't push that many K/s, it's not the processor's fault, but the OS (and the program you try to push with).
      On my mac G4 450 Mhz (hardly a rocket), Camino browser easily d/l's @ 200 K/s, while MS Explorer can't go higher than 50 K/s, and then goes down in speed. It's terrible!
      A properly programmed OS can do wonders! My amiga friends allways boast about how fast it goes for them, and they are so right. Optimization goes a long way on machines that are stuck in the past.

    5. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Informative

      I tend to disagree. If a 486 can't push that many K/s, it's not the processor's fault, but the OS (and the program you try to push with).
      On my mac G4 450 Mhz (hardly a rocket), Camino browser easily d/l's @ 200 K/s, while MS Explorer can't go higher than 50 K/s, and then goes down in speed. It's terrible!


      Actually, I think this misconception of the speed of the 486 is due to people who are

      1. Using serial port communications
      2. Have a crappy serial port

      I got this faulty logic when I was hunting for a SCSI rom drive for a 486sx PS/2. I was told by the staff "oh, it's a 486, well they can't use anything but a 1x drive anyway" and it's like "oh really, so I guess I have to use a 1x hard disk cause modern ones are just too damn fast".

      My 8bit experence is pretty limited to the Atari, but I did own a scsi controler and had a 1meg ramdisk and let me tell you there was a serious peformance increase. Given the fact that it's practicaly impossible to get replacement drives and such for these vintage computers, it makes sence to go ethernet.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That machine is a beast compared to a C64.

      The first box I had after the C64 was a 80286 cruising along at a blazing 16mhz, and that was a quantum leap upgrade. The C64 plodded along at a piddly 1mhz, with a whopping 64kilobytes of ram. I'd be real surprised if the C64 could utilize a fast connection, especially since all the data is running over serial cables for god's sake.

      Not to be a bastard, but I've got an obsolete TI-83 calculator sitting on my desk which can do anything a C64 can do, and I don't have to lug around a 30 pound floppy drive to use it.

      Just my opinion. Flame away.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by spectral · · Score: 1

      Yea, I was stuck with a 14.4 until I got cable because when I went to buy a modem to upgrade the 2400, the guy told me that a 28.8 would be too fast for my 386sx/33 to handle.

      And I believed him, wow I was ignorant back then. :)

    8. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Yea, I was stuck with a 14.4 until I got cable because when I went to buy a modem to upgrade the 2400, the guy told me that a 28.8 would be too fast for my 386sx/33 to handle.

      And I believed him, wow I was ignorant back then. :)


      I could not believe that a 386sx/33 would be too slow, but this was based on my personal observations using a laplink (TM) serial cable to a 8086 based machine and a 386sx/16. The 8086 was the bottleneck, I did have to use flow control, but I could actually set the ports 115.2kb/sec. There were errors, crc checking was needed, but for the most part on the XT end of things my throughput was close to 100kb/sec. I assume this was either a fault of the serial board, or perhaps I needed a larger fifo buffer. the uarts were soldered on the serial board on the XT machine, so it wasn't easy to upgrade to a 16550.

      Now, based on my experence with commodore 64 people, who spoke alot about high speed modems and why they couldn't be implemented, one concern was the display of text on the screen may have not been able to keep up with I believe they said 9600 baud. I have no FACTS on this subject but this sounds reasonable.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by MrBlint · · Score: 0

      the most realistic thing to do would be to throw it in the bin.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    10. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the C64 used a more RISC-like processor {6510, an extended 6502} which even had a rudimentary pipeline {only one byte; instructions varied from 1-3 bytes long, but it can decide in advance that it needn't do anything for a NOP, and conditionals only slow down execution if they pass and have to fetch from elsewhere in memory}. A 1MHz 6510 was more like a 4MHz Z-80. Especially when you add plenty of memory {65xx instruction set can access locations $0000-$00ff using a 2-byte instruction instead of 3 bytes, giving you almost an extra 256 registers}.

      I'm sure this topic will attract more noise than signal.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    11. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by Compton+Q.+Groundhog · · Score: 1
      Now, based on my experence with commodore 64 people, who spoke alot about high speed modems and why they couldn't be implemented, one concern was the display of text on the screen may have not been able to keep up with I believe they said 9600 baud. I have no FACTS on this subject but this sounds reasonable.

      Something like that. Someone recently got 56k working over the user port by blanking the screen. The VIC-II graphics chip steals cycles from the CPU for DMA every 8 scan lines. By setting a bit in the VIC-II that disables the screen, the CPU has more horsepower for bit banging on the user port.

      Without blanking the screen, the maximum on a C64 using the user port is between 2400 & 9600bps, depending on how the software is written.

      Most power users these days use Swiftlink or Turbo232 cartridges, which eliminate a lot of the bottlenecks of the user port because they plug a real 6551 ACIA into the expansion port (rather than making the CPU emulate one). The theoretical maximum using one of these is about 78,000bps for stock C64 and 157,000bps for one with a SuperCPU (20MHz accelerator), assuming they aren't doing any screen updates, etc. Still, 56kbps is quite possible for a stock machine.

      My personal system (C128D w/SuperCPU) gets a PPP connection from my Windows 2000 box over serial @ 115,200bps. It takes longer to load games from floppy than it takes to save them to my CMD hard drive.

    12. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by Grayputer · · Score: 1

      You stated: ...but I could actually set the ports 115.2kb/sec. There were errors, crc checking was needed, but for the most part on the XT end of things my throughput was close to 100kb/sec.

      If the 100kbs throughput is true end to end and the 115.2 kpbs is the serial port clock rate then that's about as good as you get. Don't forget that serial transmissions use start and stop bits so a single 8 bit bytes is about 10 bits transmitted. Or about 92Kbps end to end on a 115.2Kbps clocked link, excluding any compression advantages or CRC overhead.

    13. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by kjs3 · · Score: 1
      My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps

      That's what you get for running Windows...

    14. Re:My 486 DX/2 66mhz machine hardly push 200kbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...was a quantum leap upgrade

      A quantum leap is the smallest measurable leap imaginable. It's not saying much. I hate people who use "quantum leap" to portray a vast improvements.

  3. New kind of bottle neck by Brahmastra · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll be the first ever time the CPU bus is a bottleneck to the Internet connection

    1. Re:New kind of bottle neck by DavyByrne · · Score: 5, Funny

      It'll be the first ever time the CPU bus is a bottleneck to the Internet connection

      But if the good ol' C64 is old enough to drink, can't it can buy those wide-mouth cans and avoid bottle necks entirely?

    2. Re:New kind of bottle neck by WarDancer · · Score: 1

      Ha! So I guess Intel wasn't totally misleading when they said their new processor made the Internet go faster? :)

    3. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Brahmastra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the use of broadband when it has just 64k of RAM? It'll download all it can store in memory in just over a second even using a dial-up connection.. and if the connection is for a lot of small packets, I don't think broadband connections particularly help latency in the case of small packets.

    4. Re:New kind of bottle neck by slaker · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot. Now I have to clean the Pepsi I just sprayed out my nose off of my monitor.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    5. Re:New kind of bottle neck by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Broadband has lower latency than dialup regardless of packet size. I agree however with your premise that this is of limited use. Still, it is kinda cool. I don't think I'll be running out and buying a used C64 anytime soon though...

    6. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Funny
      What's the use of broadband when it has just 64k of RAM? It'll download all it can store in memory in just over a second even using a dial-up connection..


      Well, but it's great for streaming videos :-)
    7. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Informative

      Point of order, Mr. Chairman...

      Modems measure speed in Kilobits, computer RAM is measured in KiloBytes, so a computer with 64K of RAM contains ~64,000 Bytes or 512,000 bits.

      A 56K modem downloads (at a theoretical maximum) 56,000 bits per second.

      Simple math reveals that with 512,000 bits of RAM, at 56,000 bps it will take 9.1 seconds to fill it's RAM capacity.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    8. Re:New kind of bottle neck by malfunct · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its less about speed and more about convienece of network connection. Its much easier for me to plug into the ethernet at home than it is to set up a serial connection to another computer on the network.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    9. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Sancho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simply not true. "Broadband" can have much, much higher latency than dialup. Just look at satellite connections. It's simple physics that the signal has to go from earth to orbit and back, which takes time.

    10. Re:New kind of bottle neck by bokmann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to the website, it comes with a VNC client. THAT would be a cool use of bandwidth... A commodore 64 with VNC capability would be a really cool, really retro, really cheap way to have a virtual console... Amaze your friends by showing them solaris, windows XP AND linux all running from a C-64!

      If it had an ssh client, that would literally be everything I needed to telecommute.

    11. Re:New kind of bottle neck by I+Like+Swords!!! · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that this is really serial, so two bits out of every ten bits are used by the serial communication. That 56000 bits translates into 5600 bytes of data. So, expect it to fill up in 11.4 seconds. ;)

      --
      .unsigged
    12. Re:New kind of bottle neck by pythonisman · · Score: 1

      But hey, if they were to bring out the Commodore 64 eXtreme edition (See Pentium Extreme), this would promise us a 'better internet experience'!

    13. Re:New kind of bottle neck by mlk · · Score: 1

      You can also get a VNC server for the C64, which is much more usefull :)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    14. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you don't still have yours? Blasphemy, I tell ya.

    15. Re:New kind of bottle neck by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      *hands head in shame* I never had one. I had a TRS-80 then skipped straight to Apples for awhile before going with Intel based boxes when they came out.

      *turns in his geek badge and fades into the night*

    16. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It can, but it typically doesn't. This is why broadband is widely preferred for online games which technically require only the bandwidth of a mediocre dialup. Latency matters, and cable/dsl tends to be much better in that respect. (e.g., 300ms vs. 50ms pings)

    17. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1
      I've still got my C64, and I'm going to get this cart.

      I also have a SuperCPU, and that thing speeds to C64 up to 20Mhz and equips it with 16MB of RAM. The C64 can even display Jpegs these days, and there is even a Linux syled OS in the works.

      Why? Because we can....

      And the C=1 should be pretty neat as well.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    18. Re:New kind of bottle neck by EverDense · · Score: 1

      I imagine it would act like one of those old
      terminals that you connect up to a mainframe.

      Basically it would just be a means for displaying data
      and passing input back to the server.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    19. Re:New kind of bottle neck by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Ethernet is not broadband. Broadband does not mean "fast".

    20. Re:New kind of bottle neck by penguinrenegade · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. Check out the C=One - Jeri Ellsworth has made this. It's basically a 20 MHz C=64, addresses up to a gig of RAM, etc. Pretty cool.

    21. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 1

      What's the use of broadband when it has just 64k of RAM?

      Any Commodore freak worth his weight in SID chips knows that Commodore released RAM expansion carts. I don't know what they're up to these days, but back in '92 a 512k expansion pack was readily available, as well as 4mhz CPU upgrade carts and hard drives up to 40meg in size! Though the CPU cart included a passthrough so you can daisy chain carts, I can't tell if the Retro Replay does or not.

      Now if I can just track down my copy of ST/R BBS...

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
    22. Re:New kind of bottle neck by cplater · · Score: 1

      Well, not really, the LANceGS has been available for over three years. It works with an Enhanced ][e or IIgs, although there are no apps for the ][e that use the interface. FWIW, Apple had created an ethernet card for the IIgs to be released with System 6 (GS/OS) but killed it at the last minute so as to not have the IIgs compete with the Macintosh LC.

      --
      -- Charles A. Plater
    23. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what in the fuck does that have to do with anything?

    24. Re:New kind of bottle neck by dosius · · Score: 1

      The SuperCPU upgrades the C64's 6510 CPU to a 14 MHz 65816 overclocked to 20 MHz. I think you can also up the RAM by a few megs as well.

      -uso.
      I'm an Apple guy, not Commodore.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    25. Re:New kind of bottle neck by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Ethernet is not broadband. Broadband does not mean "fast".

      Well thank you so much for clearing up the difference between analog and digital signalling.

      While you did that, I think I saw the world passing you by... :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    26. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem isn't the satellite concept itself, but in the methods used. In order to have lots of legal satellite sending units at people's homes, they have to be weak. Weak signals take longer to receive, hence latency.

      You do know, of course, that most calls to overseas get bounced off lots of satellites before they reach the caller. Most international calls are still nearly realtime, not half as bad as a 1000ms ping which home satellite connections give you.

    27. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Another take on this: I'm venturing a guess here, but I'd assume that most fanatics dedicated enough (and there are tons out there) will already have their RAMLink/REU upgrade and have gobs of ram at their disposal.

      I think last time I checked they were up to 512mb of non-volatile storage (rechargable battery backed).

    28. Re:New kind of bottle neck by WebfishUK · · Score: 1

      64K of RAM? My God this is only an order of magnitude away from the maximum anyone will ever need!

      --
      -- "Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!"
    29. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Add-on hardware developed within the past 7 years now enables a C64 to operate at 20MHz and be fitted with up to 16MB of RAM. These days, at first glance, that doesn't appear very impressive, however, when you consider the implications of running some seriously lean code designed for a 1MHz machine at 20x its normal speed, it makes for a significant difference. 16MB of RAM is way more than a double-king-sized bed for a 6510 processor to enjoy. Add to that the C64's long-time ability to use battery-backed RAM-based storage devices in place of its older, slow-loading disc drives and you have one hell of a fast machine that's nearly instantly on as soon as you flip the power switch.

    30. Re:New kind of bottle neck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, what friends?

    31. Re:New kind of bottle neck by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      With a REU (Ram Expansion Unit) like the 1764, the C=64 has access to 512K of RAM in a paged fashion (similar to EMS memory for PCs).

      Keep in mind that many people run the C=64 at much faster speeds than the default 1MHz -- the SuperCPU runs at 20MHz. (http://cmdrkey.com/cbm/supercpu/superinfo.html)

      For those who do not have access to a real REU, perhaps you can help this guy in building your own REU. (http://home.hccnet.nl/g.baltissen/e_reu.htm)

      Also keep in mind there is a hard-drive interface for the C=64 which was available in the day -- the Lt. Kernal (http://www.geocities.com/profdredd/ltk/ltk.htm) and other offerings, along with potential offers from Commodore itself (http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/hds. html).

      There is a potential real use for a broadband interface for the C=64, and although I will never need one, I am happy to see it produced for those who do.

    32. Re:New kind of bottle neck by rifter · · Score: 1

      What's the use of broadband when it has just 64k of RAM? It'll download all it can store in memory in just over a second even using a dial-up connection.. and if the connection is for a lot of small packets, I don't think broadband connections particularly help latency in the case of small packets.

      The use is being able to connect your C64 to the internet without buying a dialup connection. It's one thing to still be running a C64. It is absolute madness to pay $23.95 a month for a dialup internet connection just for your C64 when you already have broadband at a cheaper price than that.

  4. Uhmm.. by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Funny

    All this with a computer that is old enough to drink

    Am I the only person who has no idea just what in the hell that is supposed to mean?

    And oh yeah, good job on the ethernet stuff for the C64.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    1. Re:Uhmm.. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0

      If the computer was human, it would be of legal drinking age.

      Geddit?

    2. Re:Uhmm.. by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 4, Informative

      It means the Commadore was released more then 21 years ago, which is that age at which its legal to drink alcohol in the US. I believe the original release was in 1982.

    3. Re:Uhmm.. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person who has no idea just what in the hell that is supposed to mean?


      It means the computer is over 21 years old. I don't recommend actually getting it a beer tho...

    4. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      legal in super-conservative places like the US

    5. Re:Uhmm.. by hornrimsylvia · · Score: 1

      those stinking americans and their age limits on drinking alcohol!

    6. Re:Uhmm.. by Andorion · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only one that had images of an old melted C64 slushee in a cup... /weird.

      ~Berj

    7. Re:Uhmm.. by Kedisar · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't recommend actually getting it a beer tho...

      Hey now, beer makes a GREAT coolant!

    8. Re:Uhmm.. by Nos. · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, in some countries there is a minimum age to purchase alcohol. In the US, its 21. According to: http://oldcomputers.net/c64.html the commodore was released Jan, 1982. Making it 21 years old, or, old enough to drink.

    9. Re:Uhmm.. by Last+Warrior · · Score: 1

      The computer and technology is older than 21 years old.

      not to overstate the obvious..
      But the computer is old enough to drink.. I believe that is what the author meant.

    10. Re:Uhmm.. by stretch0611 · · Score: 4, Funny
      All this with a computer that is old enough to drink... Am I the only person who has no idea just what in the hell that is supposed to mean?

      It means I feel old because my first computer was a Commodore Vic-20, which came out a few years before the 64.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    11. Re:Uhmm.. by aWalrus · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person who has no idea just what in the hell that is supposed to mean?

      The Commodore 64 has been around since 1981, so it's 22 years old. Hence, if it were to walk into a bar, it would be able to order a Jack Daniels.

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    12. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a life loser, and find something worth actually bitching about.

    13. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot...

    14. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am i the only one that thought old enough to drink meant that it was as old as a good scotch?

    15. Re:Uhmm.. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      I took it as well aged. Then again, I like 20 year old Scotch so i may be biased.

      10 years ain't old enough, 20 years is about right. 6 years old is paint remover.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    16. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is there a way to get a photo ID for a computer? Maybe use it's serial number to form some sort of Federal ID card? Can I bring it into liquor stores and buy some 151?

    17. Re:Uhmm.. by Virtex · · Score: 1

      My first computer was a Timex Sinclair 1000, which came out even before the Vic-20. I guess that means I should feel even older than you. Damn you! Just as I was beginning to feel comfortable with my age, you just had to come along and ruin for me. Thanks a lot! :-)

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    18. Re:Uhmm.. by RedBear · · Score: 1

      And I'm sitting here for five minutes after reading that, wondering just exactly what a computer would taste like. Does it go well with seafood?

      Gives new meaning to the phrase "aged to perfection", I guess. :)

    19. Re:Uhmm.. by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      Wait... so you're saying I shouldn't have drank the stagnant rain water that gathered in my C64 box starting 10 years ago?? WTF I thought you meant the rain water aged like a fine wine$!@$

    20. Re:Uhmm.. by thellamaman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of wine; after 21 years it ought to be getting pretty good!

    21. Re:Uhmm.. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      All this with a computer that is old enough to drink.

      Am I the only person who has no idea just what in the hell that is supposed to mean?


      Nobody has quoted Douglas Adams yet on this one?

      Ford Prefect: "It's rather unpleasant -- much like being drunk."

      Arthur: "What's so unpleasant about being drunk?"

      Ford: "You ask a glass of water."

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    22. Re:Uhmm.. by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only one that had images of an old melted C64 slushee in a cup... /weird.

      I think that is more valid than people dreaming of sitting next to a C64

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    23. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A macintosh walks into a bar in Afghanistan. It asks for a drink. The bartender says "this isn't a gay bar, get the hell out!"

      Pissed off, the mac leaves. On his way out, in comes a Pentium PC. It asks for a beer. The bartender says "we don't serve your kind here." PC leaves.

      In ambles a C64 with a cocky stride. Bartender says "hey C64." C64 says, "hey Junis. Gimme a beer will ya?"

    24. Re:Uhmm.. by spektr · · Score: 4, Funny
      All this with a computer that is old enough to drink
      Am I the only person who has no idea just what in the hell that is supposed to mean?

      That means that this computer I loved so much years ago grew old and became a farting old drunkard who is jealous of my athlon workstation. I feel a little embarassed when I see him trying to keep up with the young generation. Now he got broadband. Drills new holes into his case. They are laughing behind his back. At night I hear him crying silently. I really breaks my heart.
    25. Re:Uhmm.. by palp · · Score: 0, Redundant

      (Score:-1, Redundant)

      Some mod has a great sense of humor.

      --
      -palp
    26. Re:Uhmm.. by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      My immediate response to the claim that the C64 was old enough to drink was to say "Bah! It can't be! I had a C64 when I was three!"

      Then I remembered that I turned 21 last week.

      Now I just feel really, really old.

    27. Re:Uhmm.. by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      It means the Commadore was released more then 21 years ago, which is that age at which its legal to drink alcohol in the US. I believe the original release was in 1982.

      I had been ``legal to drink'' in the U.S. for several years in 1982. My, how time flies.

      I have fond memories of the C64. It was much cheaper than the Apple II, and (except for the painfully slow disk drives) equally capable. A good little machine for hardware hacking, using the 6502. Of course, the Tandy 102 even better, if you liked the 8085 chip.

    28. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, it's as old as a good vintage wine?

    29. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IDlOT...lDI0T...IDI0T...IDlOT...lDI0T...IDI0T...ID lOT...lDI0T...IDI0T...IDlOT...lDI0T...IDI0T...

    30. Re:Uhmm.. by hohokus · · Score: 1

      Yes. :)

    31. Re:Uhmm.. by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      You feel old? I remember when they were new.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    32. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, mister moderator, were not as funny as the original. Nothing about the above post is redundant. It's offtopic.

    33. Re:Uhmm.. by kubrick · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Commodore legally situated in the Bahamas? What's the legal drinking age there?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    34. Re:Uhmm.. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 4, Informative
      The C64 had a 6510 actually, but the 1541 (diskdrive) used a 6502 for a disk controller. The way the 6502 was used in the drive was a cool hack btw., they had it running two threads (each having 128 bytes of stack).

      I loved the C64, and 20 years later I still know some of the ROM routine addresses by heart (like the obvious $ffd2); but when I got down to studying the 1541 it was a revelation, I got the feeling for the first time there was code in there so clever I couldn't have written it myself. I was about 17 at the time, and it convinced me that I could actually learn something in CS. Ah, memories :)

    35. Re:Uhmm.. by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1

      Yes, the 6510 was a version of the 6502. As I recall, it had the same special instructions for quickly accessing the bottom hundred or so bytes of ram, which I always thought were a really nifty feature. The Sharp PC 1500 had a similar feature in its (totally unrelated) CPU.

    36. Re:Uhmm.. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Exactly, the memory was divided into 256 pages of 256 bytes. The first page was the "zero page" for use with the fast instructions, the second page was the stack.

      The difference between the 6510 and the 6502 was that the 6510 had bank switching capabilities. This way you could fit 64k ram and 48k rom into the 64k address space.

    37. Re:Uhmm.. by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      As I believe that little player there is a Divx Player.

    38. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The zero page was available for the 6502, too, so this is not the difference - you might know this, but I doubt the former poster understood it.

      The 6510 not even had bank switching capabilities. The difference was that it had a 6 bit I/O port, which was uses in the C64 in combination with the PLA to implement bank-switching.

      It was only 6 bits because there were no more pins available in the DIL40 package.

      The other differences were merely minor. The data sheet tells something about a revised timing, which should have causes problems if interfaces with some other parts from the 65xx series (like a 6522) - but it seems it did not do.

      The reason for this was that the 6502 had a setup time > 0 for before Phi2; anyway, since the VIC 6567/6769 was to share the bus with the 6510, it was not feasible to have a setup time bigger 0, so this detail was changed.

    39. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The C64 had a 6510 actually, but the 1541 (diskdrive) used a 6502 for a disk controller. The way the 6502 was used in the drive was a cool hack btw., they had it running two threads (each having 128 bytes of stack).

      Not even 128 bytes of stack, the 1541 had only $45 bytes (=69 bytes) for the whole stack for both routines.

      Well, it was not that tricky as it seems, just the main control loop handling almost anything from bus access to logical operations on the drive, and the (interrupt-driven) job loop which actually performed the access to the drive itself.

      This design was taken from the previous "bigger" drives which had used two 6502 for each task before. It was just an optimization to just use one processor.

    40. Re:Uhmm.. by tjack · · Score: 0

      LOL very cool. My very first computer was also a Vic-20 (in '83 I think); I had it for 3 weeks until I got tired of it, and got the C-64. Then I very briefly had the C-128 before I went to PCs.

      Many, many years later I had gone through a Cray (CS6400 - i.e. E-10000 pre-cursor) ... funny how times change.

      A while ago, I bought a C-64 SX (portable version with built-in mini CRT) off eBay, which back then in the early 80s I wanted badly, but it was quite expensive. Just for memories' sake - I admit, I never even powered it on (yet).

      --
      Thomas J. Ackermann interim CEO/Founder - Melior, Inc. iSecure - CyberWarfare Defense www.dDos.com thomas@ddos.com
    41. Re:Uhmm.. by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      *chuckle* You've got it bad? My first claim to computerdom consisted of an Atari 1200XL.

      I'm a relic, and I'm not even 30 yet!

    42. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 6510 actually has a 8 bit I/O port which in turn is used to control the PLA ( custom bankswitching logic IC made by mos ). So changing some of the bits in the I/O port ( located @ $0000 and $0001 ) will manipulate the bank configurations in the C64. Oh, and the default ROM in c64 is 20kb ( 8kb basic, 4kb char, 8kb kernal ). If you ment external carts, many carts use own banklogic which is ( most often ) controlled by some address(es) in the I/O area ( also banked @ $d000-$dfff ), to allow cartridge roms larger than 16kb ( max default size allowed by the onboard logic in theC64 ).

    43. Re:Uhmm.. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Surely it's been old enough to drink for around three years, then? It was released in 1982, so doesn't that make it 21?

    44. Re:Uhmm.. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      The 6510 not even had bank switching capabilities. The difference was that it had a 6 bit I/O port, which was uses in the C64 in combination with the PLA to implement bank-switching.

      You're right of course, I got carried away a little. It happens when you reminisce on things/persons you (have) loved. :)

    45. Re:Uhmm.. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1

      There were only 6 bits to control the PLA (Programmable Logic Array) if I recall correctly. I know about the ROM size in the C64, but I was assuming (wrongly) every 6510 setup had a PLA. I think I'll have an attic-safari in the weekend, see if I can find the old specsheets and books. (The only 6502 book I still keep around is 6502 Assembly Language Subroutines by Leventhal and Saville.)

    46. Re:Uhmm.. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      I stand corrected about the stack size :)

      I kown in hindsight running 2 threads on a 6502 isn't that great an achievement; but at the time I was very impressed with the way they coded some reentrable subroutines and (mostly :) kept the threads out of eachothers hair without real semaphores/mutexes.

    47. Re:Uhmm.. by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      ...you might know this, but I doubt the former poster understood it.

      You're mostly right on that. I liked the C64 so much that I got one for my father for Christmas one year (He was a ham, and the C64 had excellent RF shielding.), but I never got very deeply into it myself. I had a nifty single board computer that I did most of my playing on. One of the neatest things about it was that it could use an oscilloscope as a CRT.

    48. Re:Uhmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You feel old? Mine was a Geniac.
      Here's a pic...
      http://online.sfsu.edu/~hl/c.Geniac.html

    49. Re:Uhmm.. by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      *chuckle* You've got it bad? My first claim to computerdom consisted of an Atari 1200XL.

      Cool. The only Atari 8bit computer that had function keys...Do you still have it?

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  5. But can it fill 10BaseT? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As we all know, the standard is whether or not something can "flood a 10BaseT network". Anyone who has read the networking HOWTOs know that Pentium 100's can "do this easily".

    So...can it? If not, how much traffic do I have to send it to bring it to a crawl? :-)

    1. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think that question depends on whether the C64 had DMA or not. If yes, then it would have a chance in hell of doing burst transmissions that could flood a 10BaseT line. If no, then why the **** are people wasting time on this?

    2. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by NickDngr · · Score: 1

      As we all know, the standard is whether or not something can "flood a 10BaseT network". Anyone who has read the networking HOWTOs know that Pentium 100's can "do this easily".

      With a 1MHz, 8-bit CPU, I seriuosly doubt the C-64 would even come close.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    3. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think that question depends on whether the C64 had DMA or not.

      Kinda. All the chips (video, sound, etc.) had direct access to the memory. But they all have to take turns, when the video chip was reading from memory, the CPU couldn't and would pause. Some of the turbo-loaders (heh, load 64k in 15 seconds from floppy .. wheeeee) would blank the screen to make sure nothing interrupted the CPU and upset the timing.

    4. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the answer. It sounds like as long as the ethernet card has a DMA processor, it could transfer data as fast as it could read it over the bus, right? Assuming that the bus was as fast as the processor (1MHz), then your maximum throughput would be a bit over 1MBit per second. Not quite enough to flood a 10BaseT, but not TOO shabby either. Of course, I'm not quite sure where you'd get one megabit from. All 8K of memory would be transfered or replaced in about 130 milliseconds.

      Remind me again why anyone would waste their time on this?

    5. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by ewhac · · Score: 5, Informative

      So...can it [flood a 10BaseT network]?

      No. It can't.

      If not, how much traffic do I have to send it to bring it to a crawl? :-)

      Not much, I would think.

      The C64 has a 1MHz 6510 8-bit CPU. The memory bus is also 1MHz. Moreover, the fastest instruction on the 6510 (which is a 6502 derivative) is two clocks. Thus, at four clocks per byte (two to read, two to write), the fastest data transfer rate you could conceivably get is 0.25 MBytes/second (in reality, it would be rather slower as the LDA and STA instructions take more than two clocks, but I don't have the timing chart in front of me).

      The C64 does have DMA, but it's dedicated to video access and refresh and can't be redirected. Moreover, these DMA cycles completely take over the bus for 40 clocks every eight video lines. So your packet writes will likely hiccup from time to time. (Presumably they have big silos on the NIC.)

      Even if the NIC did DMA itself, it would have to get out of video's way every eight lines, which means you couldn't flood the line indefinitely. Also, the C-64 has a mere -- surprise! -- 64K of RAM. At 1MByte/sec, you'd run out of RAM in 0.065536 seconds.

      Schwab
      C-64 Early Adopter

    6. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Remind me again why anyone would waste their time on this?

      The challange! And it's fun!

      Must most importantly, it keeps the strange people off the streets...

    7. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Must most

      I learned to type on a C64 ... it doesn't show does it? :)

    8. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by jazman · · Score: 1

      > why the **** are people wasting time on this?

      Ah, you must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot. You'll find all sorts of really interesting geeky stuff round here, like web servers made from pizza boxes, Rubik cube solvers made out of Lego and so on.

      The answer to "Why?" usually takes the form "Because we can," rather than "Because it's commercially viable in Project X". If you consider any of these geeky pursuits a waste of time, there's a good chance posting on /. is wasting your time.

    9. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm all for geeky pursuits. I simply stated that if no DMA was available, there'd be no point what-so-ever. Now that I know DMA is available, it makes some sense. But a modem would work just as well given the amount of data that the C64 has available to transfer. The funny part is that the microprocessors and memory used in the ethernet is probably more powerful than the C64 itself! :-P

    10. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by Slashi · · Score: 1

      > I think that question depends on whether the C64 had DMA or not

      Well, since the cs8900 which is used in the "The Final Ethernet" and/or "RR-Net" has to be polled in 8 bit mode; even the interrupt mode does not work when used with 8 bit, cf. http://www.cirrus.com/en/pubs/appNote/an181.pdf

    11. Re:But can it fill 10BaseT? by Gumshoe · · Score: 1
      64K of RAM. At 1MByte/sec, you'd run out of RAM in 0.065536 seconds.


      Didn't it have 48k of RAM and a 16k ROM?
  6. alcohol problem... by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...All this with a computer that is old enough to drink." uh....to drink? since when do things get so old that you can drink them?

    1. Re:alcohol problem... by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      There are drinks that are supposed to age before drinking them. Wine comes to mind. Also, I think the difference between whiskey and burbon is how long it has been aging.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    2. Re:alcohol problem... by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      --
      I do not have a signature
    3. Re:alcohol problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you could put an ice cube in a glass.

    4. Re:alcohol problem... by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 1

      Obviously not a whisky man :)

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    5. Re:alcohol problem... by SheldonYoung · · Score: 1

      Aparently you have never seen what happens to leftovers in my refridgerator.

    6. Re:alcohol problem... by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      Since the Soylent Green branded soft drinks came out?

    7. Re:alcohol problem... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      since when do things get so old that you can drink them?

      Not a fan of scotches and cognacs, are you?

    8. Re:alcohol problem... by BadElf · · Score: 1

      By this logic, I guess I'm the equivalent of a good cognac, since I'm 36...

    9. Re:alcohol problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't like scotch, do you?

  7. Progression by eyepeepackets · · Score: 4, Funny


    Does this mean that some day, following a screwy bit of logical progression, I'll be able to run WindowMaker on my TI-56?

    I can hardly wait! *hop*

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:Progression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I'll be able to run WindowMaker on my TI-56?
      >
      > I can hardly wait! *hop*

      If you have a difficult time with "waiting" then maybe running WindowMaker on a TI-56 isn't for you.

    2. Re:Progression by Upphew · · Score: 0

      I hope that *hop* doesn't mean you are holding your breath...

  8. However... by zlevenz · · Score: 0

    All this with a computer that is old enough to drink.

    The consequences, however, would be quite explosive. Thank you, I'll be around until Saturday!

  9. Well thank God! by evil-osm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was beginning to fear that I would have to upgrade at some point!

    --


    E.

    Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
  10. Post please by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, start posting "C= 64 was the 'my first'/'last real'/'first real'/'best' computer/piece of crap" messages.

    1. Re:Post please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to research at an English university, the Commodore 64 was a product of Commodore Business Machines.

  11. Equally impressive by spellcheckur · · Score: 3, Funny

    I finally got networked play going for my Atari 2600.
    I gotta tell you, being able to play "Combat" head-to-head over the Internet is an absolute revolution in gaming!

    1. Re:Equally impressive by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that how AOL/PC Link/Q-Link/Quantum Link started out? Some sort of cart for the 2600 that downloaded games over the phone line? I don't think they were multi-player, but my memory is hazy these days.

  12. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone please tell me. This simply defies logic.

    1. Re:Why? by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      Why?

      The same reason dogs lick themselves. Because they can.

    2. Re:Why? by RY · · Score: 1

      why not

      Now to find a tcp/ip stack for my CPM computer.

  13. Ok I admit I'm impressed by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 1

    When's the Dragon 32 port of Contiki and ethernet card coming out - I've still got 2 gathering dust in the wardrobe :P

    --
    I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
  14. LAN games? by deadhammer · · Score: 1

    So I can finally, after all these years, play some head-to-head Gianna Sisters deathmatch?

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  15. The funny thing is by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    any DSL modem or router is probably at least a hundred times faster than a C64.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:The funny thing is by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

      whats even "funnier" is that the 42KB OS the commodore is running could easily be ported to run directly on the modem/router.

      my companies microprocessor is on most DSL modems and i believe it operates at 8 mhtz.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  16. That ethernet card uses an AMD microprocessor by Squeezer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can see the AMD square/arrow logo on the corner of one of the chips. Cool.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:That ethernet card uses an AMD microprocessor by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

      That's an AMD flash memory chip, not a CPU.

    2. Re:That ethernet card uses an AMD microprocessor by phorm · · Score: 1

      You know, that process probably has more computing power than the C64... at least in terms of specific mathematical operations per second.

      Seriously though, I could understand getting kicks out of modding newer PC's to run in the C64 case... but running a C64 online?

      The only possibly use I could see for this is as a low-power-consumption dumb-terminal. My Pentium 1's run without fan and have a small heatsink, perhaps the C64 runs with no heatsink (or virtually none)? I suppose for those concerned about heat output and/or power consumption it would possibly useful, but a 386 would probably do as well too with more power.

    3. Re:That ethernet card uses an AMD microprocessor by raodin · · Score: 1

      It probably runs with no heatsink, I've got 25mhz 68040s (in old macs) that didn't ship with one.

    4. Re:That ethernet card uses an AMD microprocessor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Probably" runs without one? Good God, kids these days have no idea, do you?

      The idea of attaching a heatsink to a 6502, 6809, 6510 or even a Z80 is laughable.

    5. Re:That ethernet card uses an AMD microprocessor by phorm · · Score: 1

      Kids. I suppose that's to imply that we're too young to have used a commodore. Au contraire, I have fond memories of early PC experience in these little beasts. However, I never took one apart, back then there was a mystique around computer hardware that made one avoid cracking it open... not to mention that for what would now be more-or-less a doorstop, any computer was damn expensive.

  17. useless by Rkane · · Score: 0

    This is ALMOST as useless as that guy who was trying to turn his tape player into a web server. I don't remember all of the details (if someone can find a link, please post) but I think that guy claimed he was running apache or something off a plain old tape player (modified, of course).

    1. Re:useless by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      A plain modified tape player! Of course! Was it given to himher by his dadmum?

    2. Re:useless by Rkane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah yes, it was the guy at humanclock.com that said he was using a tandy trs 80 as a webserver

  18. Announcement, when Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    (Anonymous non-karma w***e posting.)

    13.09.2003: Retro Replay and RR-Net available
    In time with the announced date, the new production run of the Retro Replay is finished. Compared to the old cartridges, only cosmetic changes have been made: The most significant change is the colour: Blue instead of black. After many requests by users, the jumpers are now mounted straight, not to the side. To ensure proper mounting in our new cases, the mounting hole has been moved and changed in diameter to perfectly fit the transparent cases.

    At the same time, the networking card RR-Net is going on sale. The card is plugged to the expansion port of the Retro Replay, and allows connecting the C64 to an intranet. Although the operating system Contiki is freeware, we have an agreement with the author Adam Dunkels: He gets paid for every RR-Net unit that's sold. Contiki is an operating system that offers many features in very small space: A TCP/IP stack, a web browser, a webserver, a VNC-client and of course a graphical user interface. It is included on a 5,25 inch disk for the C64. To make use of all features of Contiki, an intranet with router should be available.
    As an introductory offer, there's a network-bundle. It contains:

    # Retro Replay
    # RR-Net with Contiki
    # transparent case
    # worldwide shipment

    together for only 100,- EUR!

    Please use the contact form for your order. Unfortunately, our domain ami.ga does not work at the moment, because the republic of Gabon is currently migrating their internet connection from satellite to undersea cable. Even with our server in Germany, both the website and email addresses are affected, but the contact form works reliably!

  19. Nothing all that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's been done before: http://www.dunkels.com/adam/tfe/

  20. Individual Computers by frohike · · Score: 1

    I met these guys (and gal :) at CGE 2k3, they are good people with some neat products. He's also made Amiga ethernet adapters as well as what looked like a homebrew Catweasel (or maybe these are the people who made it to begin with?). Also these are the guys who sponsored Jeri to create the C-1 modernized C64 motherboard.

    1. Re:Individual Computers by FromWithin · · Score: 1

      Individual Computers made/make the Catweasel to begin with and to continue with. He's a clever swine, he is (Catweasel Flipper, for instance) and has made a lot of cool stuff.

    2. Re:Individual Computers by British · · Score: 1

      Hey I still have an old Amiga 500. Are they planning on selling the Ethernet adaptor for that? I wouldn't mind having one of those for dumb terminal usage.

    3. Re:Individual Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The A500 expansion port (The one on the left hand side, under the removable cover) is essentially the same as a Zorro II slot. You can build (and possibly buy) an A500 expansion to Zorro II convertor that would allow you to connect a Zorro II ethernet card to your A500.

      Probably an expensive & fiddly option, though!

  21. watch out by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get ready for lots of 40-column width formatted Slashdot postings! :)

    1. Re:watch out by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Sun will now port Java over to the C64? ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:watch out by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forget that! I have code (if you read machine language, that is) for an update which allows for 80 columns. Oh, and GEOS, which is the One True GUI. ;)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    3. Re:watch out by mistered · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yep, here's a screenshot of the C64 showing slashdot in a browser.

      --
      Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
    4. Re:watch out by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I think I'll just stick with my Atari 800 with 80-column card, thanks.

    5. Re:watch out by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      Actually the column with is 36 characters.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    6. Re:watch out by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of the Weird Al song quote, "What kinda chip ya got in there, a Dorito?"

    7. Re:watch out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. The comments page (as of writing) was up to 99,622 bytes of HTML). Nobody's going to be reading - let alone posting comments to articles on a machine with 64K of memory.

      Now the reduced page.. maybe.

    8. Re:watch out by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Wordy bitches, always gotta spoil a man's fun.

    9. Re:watch out by tekiegreg · · Score: 1
      You could almost do that, granted the following languages were available on C64 (http://www.npsnet.com/danf/cbm/languages.html)
      • Ada
      • APL
      • Assembly language
      • BASIC interpreters & compilers
      • BASIC extenders
      • C
      • COBOL
      • COMAL
      • FORTH
      • FORTRAN
      • LISP
      • LOGO
      • M (MUMPS)
      • Pascal
      • PILOT

      None of these are object oriented I believe (some I never heard of). However Java was begat by C++, which is Begat By C, so cutting a few corners here and there, a barebones version of Java for C64 might just be doable...
      --
      ...in bed
    10. Re:watch out by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC, Contiki reloads the page when you scroll. So it should handle any size page...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  22. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. Neat by pavon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, and the way that the contiki webbrowser is designed you can even view site like slashdot who's html is larger than the amount of RAM in the machine itself!

    1. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what swapfiles are for.

    2. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also Contiki would probably filter the html first for what it doesn't understand (tables, fonts, css, etc.)

    3. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, swapping out to the tape-drive?

    4. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to invent a big memory expansion card now.

  24. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    20% of the people in the world do not have enough to eat. Want something interesting to do? Help feed one or more of the hungry.
    Then why are you sitting and posting to Slashdot? Help feed one or more of the hungry instead, hypocrite!
  25. C=64 sucks, ATARI RULES!!!!!!! by bluGill · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your junk C=64 machine sucks. My Atari rules. ATASCII is soo much better than that ugly ASCII you have to use.

    I was going to post this in all caps like any kid back then would have, but I decided to save everyone's eyes. (I think the lameness filter would have stoped that)

  26. I can't wait by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will port Mozilla to the C64, or at least Lynx or Mosiac? Nothing like browsing the web in 16 different colors, but MIDI/MOD songs will sound great on the SID chip.

    I wonder if Adobe will port Acrobat Reader to the C64? Imagine if Apple did a Quicktime port? How about Shockwave Flash too.

    I remember that a company bought out the C64 and its games and had a web portal to buy them. Imagine if they created a subscription service to download and play C64 games over this broadband device for an actual C64? Best use I can think of an Ethernet adapter for a C64. Has to be faster than loading the games from a 1541 drive or tape. :)

    C64 users, welcome to our world.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:I can't wait by Creedo · · Score: 1

      They don't need to. Contiki, the OS that comes with this card, has a browser. And a web server.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  27. Yeah, it's ethernet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's not even 10baseT ethernet. No Cat-5 cables here. You need freakin Coax for this thing.

    1. Re:Yeah, it's ethernet... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Erm, that's why they make ADAPTERS. Or, you could take some coax cable, cut off the end, and put that on a Cat5 cable...

    2. Re:Yeah, it's ethernet... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
      Sure looks like 10Base-T to me...

      RJ45 socket
      8 little wires in it
      plugs into my 10BaseT hub...

      Maybe I'm missing something by owning one.... :-/

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  28. networking calculators by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    Yipee! Soon they'll have a way to hook up my solar powered scientific calculator. Then I can trade formulas and answers (wait...that would be wrong) with friends from Carnegie Mellong AND MIT. Awww yeah!

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:networking calculators by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I'd kind of like to figure out how to hook up my Tandy TRS-80 PC-5 'Personal Computer' to the net. It has a sort of an I/O interface, a row of pins on one side that you're supposed to hook a printer to.

      But doing external I/O on that thing would probably drain it's batteries pretty bad. I've owned that particular Personal Computer for three+ years now. Bought it on eBay. It still has the coin battery in it that it had when I bought it. And I've used it some, it hasn't just sat on the shelf. I programmed in my little 'benchmark' BASIC program that calculates PI. It's pretty slow.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  29. Usa! USA! U. S. A.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd best sit down and shuddup afore you get a cruise missile up your ass, Rene!

    1. Re:Usa! USA! U. S. A.! by Lispy · · Score: 1
      Can't we all just get along? I mean, with the munich Oktoberfest starting on saturday, why don't you come over to munich (yup, the same who run Linux on their cities desktops) and have a drink or too?

      We could hang out and play "Raid over Moscow" on my Commodore 64 (no broadband yet, sorry) and enjoy some cold war nostalgia when we all stood side by side against the communists...ahh, those were the days...;-)

    2. Re:Usa! USA! U. S. A.! by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      No, and we can't drink alcoholic beverages either. We can't just get along until we've agreed on just what it is we are going to get along on, and we haven't done that yet so, no we can't get along!

    3. Re:Usa! USA! U. S. A.! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Great, just what I need - to be surrounded by a bunch of drunk German computer nerds.

      I think I'll wait for the Berlin techno festival; at least there'll be cute girls there.

    4. Re:Usa! USA! U. S. A.! by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      I say we agree where that Raid over Moscow is one of the best games. ever.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  30. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    How is the parent offtopic again?: "I agree with the FP. 20% of the people in the world do not have enough to eat. Want something interesting to do? Help feed one or more of the hungry. If you care about being relevant, case mods, games, and broadband C64s are OFF TOPIC. Don't mod this down just because you disagree. Look at the logic."

  31. just the first step by thnmnt · · Score: 2, Funny

    imagine a whole beowulf cl....ahh forget it.

    --
    Go read some bible: nubible.com
  32. It's the same guy... by adadun · · Score: 1

    That was also done by Adam Dunkels, the guy behind Contiki and the RR-Net Ethernet card.

    1. Re:It's the same guy... by adadun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ah, kicked that submit button too fast...

      The RR-Net Ethernet card is a re-design and logical continuation of the TFE Ethernet card, for which Contiki was originally written. The RR-Net and the TFE are built upon the same Ethernet controller chip: the CS8900a, which has an 8-bit mode and is very well suited for interfacing with 8-bit CPUs and microcontrollers.

      I am actually running Contiki together with an RR-Net Ethernet card on my 10 MBit/s broadband connection myself. Of course, it isn't actually possible to saturate the connection with the C64, but at least it is possible to finally use a C64 with the Internet without having to go through a PC, which is quite satisfying :-)

  33. Lords of Conquest by Morglum · · Score: 2, Informative

    In a shocking fit of synchronicity, I stumbled upon a java aplet version of Lords of Conquest, and have been playing for the last hour...an hour before this story was posted...

    Ah, the good ol days. Who said you could never go back?

  34. Commodore firewall by lsd4all · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a great idea to limit bandwidth usage. Hookup up a C64 as a firewall and *presto* you are blocking ports and keeping the P2P usage down to 2K/sec. Burn the firewall code to a start-up cartridge ROM, make the C64 run off a 12V battery with a DC-DC converter for the needed +/-5V. Throw the whole thing in a black box with a solar panel on top and sell it as the next big thing in network security.

    1. Re:Commodore firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What idiot modded the parent as "Interesting"?

      It's _FUNNY_, not "Interesting".

    2. Re:Commodore firewall by freeweed · · Score: 1

      It'd sell less than my Total Network Security Scissors. They block all known malicious ports, and P2P usage is pretty much nonexistent.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Commodore firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't work. You also need 9V AC.

    4. Re:Commodore firewall by lsd4all · · Score: 1

      damn it. I was hoping no one would catch that. Ok, I forgot to add the DC-AC inverter for the 9VAC.

    5. Re:Commodore firewall by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1

      Can't do that... it would violate SCO's IP/Patents/Copyrights/Contracts, depending on which day it is...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

  35. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by RocketScientist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    20% of the people in the world are hungry.

    Shouldn't you be out feeding them instead of:
    1) reading slashdot
    2) reading a story on slashdot you don't think is worthy
    3) reading, and then commenting on a story on slashdot that you don't think is worthy

    By your line of reasoning, nearly everything is offtopic and not relevant except for the bare necessities of life. What a very painful existance you must lead.

  36. Noooo dumbasses.... by dhowells · · Score: 2, Funny

    I and (perhaps) all the rest of the Europeans out there thought: Old enough to drink... For a nice burgandy that probably means '94.

    D.

    --
    use Blunt::Instrument;
    1. Re:Noooo dumbasses.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yank: What's a Burgundy?

    2. Re:Noooo dumbasses.... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I and (perhaps) all the rest of the Europeans out there thought: Old enough to drink... For a nice burgandy that probably means '94.

      I thought the same thing. I was really curious why they were equating the age for aged alcohol. I figured I was missing something, which I was, and I'm not European.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    3. Re:Noooo dumbasses.... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Other Yank: It's a color of some sort. Yank: Europeans drink colors? Now that just plain bizarre.

    4. Re:Noooo dumbasses.... by sebi · · Score: 1

      Other Yank: It's a color of some sort. Yank: Europeans drink colors? Now that just plain bizarre.

      We don't drink colors. Colours maybe--you just need the extra helping of u to get it down.

  37. You guys are kinda slow, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not as slow as my C64! ::rimshot:: But seriously, that sentence means that the computer could drink. It's 21+, ya dig?

    1. Re:You guys are kinda slow, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idiot

  38. C-64 by Pompatus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The important thing to learn from this is that when it comes down to what the average user wants to do with a computer, the new ultra fast Xtreme P4 is not necessary. Surfing the web, email, and word processing can be done with a sub $100 computer system given the correct software.

    This also brings up the sheer amount of unneccessary bloat in alot of software today.

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:C-64 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I don't think you want to be trying to display graphics-heavy websites, or, worse yet, Flash-only websites, with a 1MHz computer. You'll just have to run everything in textmode and deal. *shrug*

      This whole thing makes me want to go check out the "Commodore One" project...

    2. Re:C-64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important thing to learn from this is that when it comes down to what the average user wants to do with a computer, the new ultra fast Xtreme P4 is not necessary.

      I agree. Screen resolutions above 40*24 characters are for pussies.

    3. Re:C-64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the next step.

      Profit!

    4. Re:C-64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even want to display flash web sites on my 700mhz computer - why would I want them on my 1 mhz computer? Flash sucks.

  39. Ethernet Board by Creedo · · Score: 1

    Circuit Cellar has an article on building an Ethernet board here.
    The CS8900 is capable of being used with an 8- or 16- bit cpu. Perfect for interfacing with small computers.

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  40. Commodore 64 ported to slashcode. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    *** Commodore 64 for slashcode ***
    *** PerlBasic 0.9, for C64, BY A.C ***
    *** 32095904383 basic bytes free ***

    READY.

    0 REM BSD IS DYING.
    1 EINIT, JBQ0, 127.0.0.1
    2 LPIPL,HTTP,"E"
    10 JLX,E,ROX,40,slashdot,org,80
    20 ROXP, SDPS, goatse.
    30 PJP 20
    40 ?RD, 0

    PL, BB$59!

    THE GOATSE.CX LAWYER SAID WE NEEDED A
    WARNING, SO IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 OR YOU
    ARE USING A COMMODORE 64, PLEASE DON'
    T LOOK AT IT! THANK YOU

    [ stinger ]

    BSD IS DYING!

  41. START * 8,1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that how you connect to the net?

    1. Re:START * 8,1 by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      LOAD"CONTIKI",8

      (wait about a minute for the file to load if no fast loader)

      RUN

      (set IP Addresses from Contiki menu with Net config if not done already before)

      Use RUN option from the Contiki Menu

      Enter www.prg - press return.

      Once loaded enter a website address, cursor over to GO and press return. (use return to stop mid stream. Cursor over to links and/or fields. etc.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  42. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Don't mod this down just because you disagree. Look at the logic."

    Some of us make a living from this geek stuff. Can't feed people if I have no money. Your logic is faulty.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  43. secret options by Sarin · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not in manual but let me reveal:
    you can connect an original arcade(r) stick to the internet adaptor. By wiggling it left-right really fast you can help the adaptor process packets, thus upgrading its speed.

    1. Re:secret options by plexxer · · Score: 1

      All right! I _knew_ all theose afternoons perfecting the 100m dash in EPYX Summer Olympics would pay off some day!

      --
      The government's moral compass is controlled by GPS.
      In times of crises, they alter it to suit their needs.
    2. Re:secret options by Wolfrider · · Score: 0

      Somebody's been reading User Friendly...
      http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/ ?id=20030913& mode=classic

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  44. Hmm... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 2, Funny

    There must be somebody out there who's really desperate for a good Slashdotting of their Commodore 64.

  45. Wowza! by benjcorey · · Score: 1


    According to this timeframe we only have to wait a couple of years before we can surf the internet on our regular ol' PC's. Woohoo!

    --

    Fat people are harder to kidnap.
  46. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20% of the people in the world do not have enough to eat. Want something interesting to do? Help feed one or more of the hungry.

    If the 20% you talk about don't have enough money to buy food, then they probably don't have enough money to replace their old Commodore 64's with new PCs either. They're probably just the people who would be excited that they too can finally surf the internet in all its big-blocky-text-based glory!

    If you care about being relevant, case mods, games, and broadband C64s are OFF TOPIC.
    There are websites devoted to feeding the hungry, and websites devoted to case mods, games, broadband and C64s. Slashdot is the latter. Maybe you're here mistakenly while looking for the former.

  47. Come on now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news!

    Slashdot's very own Junis, from Afghanistan, has been doing this with his Commodore 64 for a long time now.

  48. Re:C=64 sucks, ATARI RULES!!!!!!! by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

    nah, back then they would have haxorizedf the entire message, asnd then gone on to flame people for 20 more messages...

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  49. Units people!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this with a computer that is old enough to drink.

    Is that old enough to drink in US units, or metric units?

  50. C64 is actually FASTER than Sun Workstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My C64 is actually FASTER than the Sun Workstation that I have on my desk.

    1. Re:C64 is actually FASTER than Sun Workstation by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 1

      Faster to do what? To boot? Maybe. But then again, who boots SparcStation more than once in a month?

    2. Re:C64 is actually FASTER than Sun Workstation by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      I take it that your Sun workstation is partially disassembled, awaiting the replacement of a critical component.

    3. Re:C64 is actually FASTER than Sun Workstation by lxs · · Score: 4, Funny
      My C64 is actually FASTER than the Sun Workstation that I have on my desk.
      let me guess... you've just thrown your C64 out of the window?
  51. Oh no, not the hoary old VIC-20 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Weren't those sold by TJ Hooker?!!!

    Allright, let's play 80's computer spokespersons for $100!

    • William Shatner -
    • Bill Cosby -
    • Alan Alda -
    • Iassic Asimov -
    1. Re:Oh no, not the hoary old VIC-20 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always did get a kick out of those sideburns on Asimov!

  52. Yea. by Lispy · · Score: 0

    Drunk again?

  53. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by katarac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that if those things are OFF TOPIC, then any recreational activity is as well. Should we do nothing in life except sustain ourselfves just enough so that we can follow worthwhile causes? If that's the case, then I must be a pretty terrible person, since the only hungry person I help feed is my room-mate.

  54. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by jratcliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "20% of the people in the world do not have enough to eat."

    Wrong. 18% of people in DEVELOPING COUNTRIES don't have enough to eat, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization. 12% of the global population is malnourished. The numbers are huge enough as it is without getting them wrong.

    "Don't mod this down just because you disagree."

    No, mod it down because it's wrong.

  55. WooHoo...4 color pr0n! by Grayswan · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see all that pr0n in crystal clear 4 colors! Talkin' about a Cheese Box!

    I'm just sitting here watching the bits go round and round.

    --
    If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
    1. Re:WooHoo...4 color pr0n! by mlk · · Score: 1

      The C64 could do 16 colours, it was the PC which could only do a crappy 4 colours.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  56. Irresponsible by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's irresponsible to put these machines on the Net! They're running kernels that haven't been patched in 2 decades. The user always runs as root. Hell, the CPU doesn't even have a privileged mode! How many minutes do you think it will be before a C64 with broadband is cracked?

    It's bad enough that people who try putting their C64 on the Internet will probably lose all of their valuable data. What really worries me, though, is a plague of dozens of zombie C64 machines under the control of hackers bringing down valuable services like Google and Yahoo with DDoS attacks.

    1. Re:Irresponsible by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think a mass DDoS attack from all the C64s in the world would overload my wristwatch. :)

    2. Re:Irresponsible by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Damn. A C64 TCP/IP virus. THAT would be something.

      No, that was NOT a suggestion.

    3. Re:Irresponsible by gothicpoet · · Score: 1
      Wow, guy, that was too funny for words...

      Valuable data on a Commodore 64. Now there's a concept.

      An army of zombie C64 machines would be like an army of zombie field mice.

      --
      Quoth he ::
      "It's all academic anyway..."
    4. Re:Irresponsible by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      What really worries me, though, is a plague of dozens of zombie C64 machines under the control of hackers bringing down valuable services like Google and Yahoo with DDoS attacks.

      I, for one, welcome our new 8-bit overlords...

    5. Re:Irresponsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, a few decades ago, BANKS ran of C64s.

    6. Re:Irresponsible by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They're running kernels that haven't been patched in 2 decades.
      C64 runs a kernal, not a kernel. ;-)

      But anyway... patch them, remotely! All you need to do is find an unchecked buffer. Send some data that is so long that it overwrites the "hidden" RAM that lies in the same address space as the kernal ROM (the 6510 will let you write to that RAM, you just can't normally read what you wrote, because you'll see the ROM instead), and then continue overwriting until the 16-bit pointer wraps around to 0 and then overwrite the memory-mapped register that controls the bank-switching so that your new kernal image becomes visible! Muahahhaha! Patched kernal!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Irresponsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's irresponsible to put these machines on the Net! They're running kernels that haven't been patched in 2 decades.

      Not to mention that the operating system was written by Microsoft.

    8. Re:Irresponsible by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      a plague of dozens of zombie C64 machines

      CPU's! CPU's! CPU's!

      (Sorry, please forgive me...)

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    9. Re:Irresponsible by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Wow, can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these 8-bit overlords??

    10. Re:Irresponsible by shirai · · Score: 1

      The good news is that all you have to do is reboot. EVERYTHING you need is in ROM. If you eject your floppy disk, hackers can't leave any permanent trace. They are going to have to rely on the overload the printer hack as the worst offense.

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

  57. Liquid refreshment by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Funny

    It means that, in order to run at a decent speed, you have to overclock the C64's 6502 so much that it requires a water cooling setup.

    1. Re:Liquid refreshment by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      It means that, in order to run at a decent speed, you have to overclock the C64's 6502 [snip]

      The C64 actually ran on a 6510. The disk drives were 6502.

      Also notable device with 6502 CPU: original Nintendo.

    2. Re:Liquid refreshment by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I did some research: wiki entry picture.

      I know just enough to be dangerous! I programmed the 6502 on the Apple II, so my knowledge of the C64 is limited.

    3. Re:Liquid refreshment by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Other home computers with a 6502:

      • Apple ][
      • Atari 400/800
      • VIC-20
    4. Re:Liquid refreshment by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      My SYM-1 is a home computer. So is the KIM-1.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    5. Re:Liquid refreshment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your KIM-1 have the standard 256 bytes of RAM or did you upgrade it to 2K?

    6. Re:Liquid refreshment by wkitchen · · Score: 1

      Close enough. The 6510 is just a 6502 with an integrated I/O port. The C64 used that to switch between ROM and RAM, and to select pages of memory in cartridges. This is how it was able to access more memory than it could directly address.

    7. Re:Liquid refreshment by dosius · · Score: 1

      If you're going to nitpick about the C64's CPU, the NES actually ran a 2A03, not a 6502. ;) It had on-chip sound capabilities and lacked BCD mode.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    8. Re:Liquid refreshment by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Does your KIM-1 have the standard 256 bytes of RAM or did you upgrade it to 2K?


      I don't have a KIM-1, I have a SYM-1. And (if I recall) the memory chips plugs in it in 2K blocks. I think mine has all 8K of sockets populated. I could be wrong on these details.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  58. I think this is terrific by jak163 · · Score: 1
    I used a C64 for a long time, and it always seemed to me there was new and better software coming out for it. This software did not require upgrades--it was for that computer. That is the improvements that were going into the software were coding improvements or conceptual improvements, not improvements designed to take advantage of increased hardware capacity. I don't know if it's because of Microsoft, or if Microsoft is the result, but these days the prevailing idea seems to be that if you want some new or better software, you need to buy a new and more powerful computer. For a while Linux went against this grain, but recently I found myself having to go to a newer linux distro just so that I could download the latest versions of Mozilla and OpenOffice. (I chose RH9 and have discovered it's slow and have found many others complaining about the same thing.) Yes I know there are alternatives, but the point is that with the C64 you didn't have to look for alternatives. Software companies were focused on coming up with new software for the existing hardware. And frankly, I think this made for better software because it was designed to just be better, not to be better when used on a more powerful machine.

    So basically I'm just glad to see there are people who are still focused on this kind of development, for the C64 specifically and for computers in general. If it can be made to work on a small scale, it should be usable on powerful systems as well. I think this was the genius of Linux--from PDAs to mainframes, the same system works. And frankly I'd really like to try this on my old C64s (I have two because a friend gave me his when he got tired of it, which was a good thing because my power supply gave out). But I wouldn't want to shell out the 100 euros....

    1. Re:I think this is terrific by jak163 · · Score: 1
      Yes I forgot my point. The point is that this is a further demonstration of the truly universal openness of TCP/IP. It's supposed to enable any system to communicate, and this is the proof that it can.

      In terms of power, I'm thinking early PDAs. Yes they had much more power than a C64, but they had vastly less power than PCs. Also they were black and white--to respond to the poster who commented on the 16 colors of the C64. So the point is there are uses for any system that can be realized by using a network.

      I initially started using the internet with a 2400 baud modem and a 486 notebook. The only way I connected was through a shell, but through that I used e-mail and netnews. There was no web to speak of yet, so I wasn't missing out on anything there. But still this greatly increased the usefulness of my computer, which up till then had been strictly for word processing. A C64 could do this easily, and I don't doubt other things as well.

      Again processing power isn't the point. It's networking per se that is the issue here. If you can network it, you can greatly increase its functionality. Granted you could have used a modem with it before, and had these uses of it, but ethernet has other advantages besides bandwidth.

  59. I am troll, hear me roar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You arrogant sonofabitch! How dare you attempt to counter my arrogant jingoism with reasonable camradrieness!!!

    1. Re:I am troll, hear me roar! by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      Funniest.

      Thread.

      EVER.

    2. Re:I am troll, hear me roar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread is heading straight to the gas chamber, I know it for sure!

    3. Re:I am troll, hear me roar! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      I always knew it. World War III won't start in Iraq, or Afghanistan or wherever. It will start from a flamewar on /.

      btw to heat up the discussion a bit:
      Once a friend of mine had some visitors from the U.S. and we showed them around town and they seemed to like what they saw. Then the other day we wanted to take them to Dachau and they replied: "Well, Munich is all nice and stuff, but we don't really appreciate what you are doing to the jews!" - Those folks believed we were still holocausting the jews, all the time. Wow, that was creepy!

    4. Re:I am troll, hear me roar! by gwm · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the story about the American tourist visiting a stately home just outside London.
      She was so impressed she commented to the tour guide "Oh, it's beautiful... but why did they build it so close to the airport?"

    5. Re:I am troll, hear me roar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that reminds me of the American tourist visiting the centre of Helsinki. Looking at the Helsinki Lutheran Cathedral a man said "Oh, we have the same in Auuuustin, Texas. Only bigger."

    6. Re:I am troll, hear me roar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the US Army idiot I overheard in a small shop in the Heidelburg market square: "Do y'all take real money here or just that dootch mark stuff?"

  60. Those impertinent whippersnappers... by Colin+Douglas+Howell · · Score: 2, Funny
    Old enough to drink...BAH!

    How about old enough to run for President?

    :-D

  61. but the real ? is by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    Can it run Linux?

    1. Re:but the real ? is by mlk · · Score: 1

      this comes up in each topic on the C64, and each time.
      No, but it can run a UNIX-a-like.

      http://hld.c64.org/poldi/lunix/lunix.html

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  62. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, another bleeding heart telling us we should feel bad if we don't spend all our waking hours taking care of the poor people.

    You say case mods, games and broadband are not relevant or on topic? This is slashdot, this is not 'SaveTheWorld.org'

    How totally pissed off and white do you have to be in order to walk around 100% of the time consumed with guilt that others are hungry? How arrogant must you be to come to a tech site and tell us how uninlightened we are because we are speaking about technical things.

    Go preach your tree hugging gospel elsewhere please. This is "News for Nerds" not "Articles about Social Issues" as your site claims to be.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  63. Sorry to be a bastard but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you feed those 20% guess what? Two years from now it'll be 40% with no food.

    Now if you could teach them to grow their own food it would be a good thing. But providing food only makes matters worse. This was the same short-sighted "do-gooder" mentality which cause the peace corps to try and eradicate diseases in South america (late 60's if I remember). The result, infant mortality dropped, and hunger became a problem there.

    If you are so dedicated, go over there and TEACH the masses how to improve their lives. If you just send food to feel better about that new SUV
    you own, you are adding to the problem.

    1. Re:Sorry to be a bastard but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you feed those 20% guess what? Two years from now it'll be 40% with no food.

      I agree with your 40% assessment, but SUVs do not make people hungry. You got your liberal agendas confused dude.

  64. Whew. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Great. Cuz this iBook/Jaguar was just waaaaay too fast, man.

    This is like climbing Mount Anthill. Because it's there. Well, it was when I started...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  65. Lol by Lispy · · Score: 1

    You think my comment was reasonable? Oh boy.

  66. Re:C=64 sucks, ATARI RULES!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your could post from your Atari but the post would be as ugly with all caps with those poor non-descending fonts...

  67. Take that trolls! by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 3, Funny
    I was beginning to fear that I would have to upgrade at some point!
    Preach it brother. I am so sick of all the "C64 is dying" trolls on Slashdot spreading their FUD. The C64 is alive, its development community is vibrant, and people will be flocking back to it in droves once SCO starts demanding $699 per seat for all modern operating systems.

    1. Re:Take that trolls! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Gzip Christ,

      As I'm sure you are aware, the C-64 is built entirely using SCO technology. Within the next six months, we will start charging a $799 / seat license fee for people who wish to continue using this technology.

      Darl McBribe

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  68. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by unshaven23 · · Score: 0
    20% of the people in the world do not have enough to eat. Want something interesting to do? Help feed one or more of the hungry.

    <rant>

    You want to have something intresting to do? Travel to Africa and help them. Don't tell me how to live my life, live yours the way you want to, or at least the way you tell others to live theirs

    So what if I want to rev up my C64 with an ethernet port? It's money I worked for and I will spend it the way I like it. Rather selfish as it may be, I'd rather not have some arrogant little do-gooder tell me what I can and cannot do. If I want to send money to help poor people I'll make sure that I won't tell anyone that they can't have nifty gadget X because unknown ethiopian boy #38298531 is starving.

    </rant>

  69. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why do we need to feed hungry people? Let them die and they won't be a problem any more.

  70. Got it! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've have this (RRnet w/Contiki) since AmiWest (july), very nice! Contiki is still getting some bugs out, but for a no-frills text browser it works great. I connect via ethernet to my dial-up router. Can surf about any site, even do Google searches. So far I have only played with the browsing but even with that I'm impressed, even with it's limits it sure runs slick.

    I would compare the stock 64 speed with it to about a 600 baud terminal connection (not bad for 1mghz displaying in hi-res mode), easy enough to read without stopping the stream (there is no buffer in the web browser, sice contiki uses a lot of the 64's 58k or so of accessible memory.)

    With the C64 20 mghz accellerator, SuperCPU (by CMD - now offered by Commodore Key,) the speed matches a modern PC - albeit a slower one.

    To sum it up, given the tight memory and small amount of hardware needed now - it sure opens up opportunities for some low-end internet projects. (even grander ones when people with RAM expansions start developing for it) I hope one day someone makes a Commodore C/G BBS and C64 Telenet Client using them or maybe a internet variation of the old Commodore Q-Link network (Q-Link was AOL before they became AOL).

    Also with the eventual release of the ultra-cool reconfigurable computer - the C-One (which can use the RR-Net card) and Jeri Ellsworth's (she created the C-One) work on an Apple II interface which I believe also has similar capabilities - you are proably going to hear about a lot more 8-bitters on the internet with their little computers. :-)

    But realistically I am hoping 'The Final Ethernet' card (which is just the Ethernet adapter interfaced to the 64) gets developed though, using the Retro Replay Utility Cartridge as an intemediary ads a buch of $$ to the price (I'm a Commodore fanatic, I had to buy one, not everyone would like those prices though.)

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Got it! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      "contiki uses a lot of the 64's 58k or so of accessible memory."

      The C64 actually had 80KB of memory total (64KB RAM and 16KB ROM), but could only address 64KB at one time.

      Normally, it would address 48KB of user RAM and 16KB of ROM (8KB BASIC + 8KB BIOS). However, you could swap out the ROM bank, allowing you to address the remaining 16KB of RAM, making it a true 64KB RAM machine... of course when you did that you lost the BASIC interpreter (not a big deal) and the BIOS routines (which WAS a big deal). Big games and apps like GEOS used this trick to get at the whole 64KB, supplying their own IO routines.

      It was always fun lobotomizing a C64 K-Mart display model by switching banks with the right POKE command. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    2. Re:Got it! by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      With the C64 20 mghz accellerator, SuperCPU (by CMD - now offered by Commodore Key,) the speed matches a modern PC - albeit a slower one.
      Do you know if the SuperCPU is compatible with Contiki and the RRnet cart? I've already requested one of these new bundles from the Australian distributor, but I would like a bit more oomph to my C64 web surfing than the original CPU is likely to provide.
    3. Re:Got it! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the RAM memory, which the 64 has 64k of but not all of it is readily accessible (do to it being 'underneath' control chips and the like.) Even when you swap out what chips you can you can't get at all of the 64k of RAM. With the ROMs it does add another 16k to the total IIRC. You could have also copied over the ROMs on the K-Mart display and then POKED in some changes, like the keyboard decode table or make the error messages extra rude, etc. (Never did that myself, I was more the BASIC deomo programmer on those store displays).

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    4. Re:Got it! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
      To use the SuperCPU with RR-Net you have to disable the Retro Replay ROM (at least on the NTSC version, don't know about PAL) To do that you set the jumper to 'Flash Mode'. Just doing the 'disable' from the retro replay menu won't do it BTW.

      Maybe as people this combination more they will work on Patches for better SCPU compatibility.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    5. Re:Got it! by g00z · · Score: 1

      I've been working on the Q-link angle, actualy:

      http://www.circleofthunder.com/q-link/

      Basicly, what I've been doing is writing a c64 c/g emulator in flash, and using XML sockets to connect to a jabber server.

      Here's the details of my strugle:

      http://www.circleofthunder.com/journal/journal.p l? sday=28&syear=2003&smonth=4

      http://www.circleofthunder.com/journal/journal.p l? sday=29&syear=2003&smonth=4

      http://www.circleofthunder.com/journal/journal.p l? sday=27&syear=2003&smonth=4

      This ethernet card is just the ticket I've been looking for actually. I was searching for a proper rs-232 adapter to use with my 64 to connect it as a dumb term to my network, but a bonafide ethernet card is just what the doctor ordered. Too bad it's a little pricey.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    6. Re:Got it! by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Ah someone else who remembers Q-Link.

      Remember Club Caribe? It was probably the first "graphical" MMOG, created in part by LucasArts.

      They've come a long way since then. =)

      I spent way too much (+)$ on Q-Link. Eventually I found out about local BBSes, which offered most of the same service without the expenses =) Anyone remember the CCGMS dial-up terminal program? Man that little proggy was awesome.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  71. YOU OWE ME A NEW C64!!!! by babyrat · · Score: 2, Funny

    You said:
    All this with a computer that is old enough to drink

    so I poured a beer into mine, and now it doesn't work...

    1. Re:YOU OWE ME A NEW C64!!!! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Dude, my HP11c calculator can drink your C64 under the table...

    2. Re:YOU OWE ME A NEW C64!!!! by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      Dude..I pour a beer into *ME* and I don't work either.

      (ok, well.. it takes a few more.. like 12 or so... but still)

      I, for one, welcome our new Cyberalcoholic Overlords.

  72. Wishlist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, all we need is Internet Explorer 64 to surf the web on these machines !

  73. It's just not the same. by Raven42rac · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's just not the same as the feeling I got when my 300 baud modem finally came in the mail that fateful day, now that was broadband back then. I remember dialing up to Q-Link, which I believe became AOL. I remember picking up a Basic game programming book and not leaving my computer room for 3 days until I had programmed and saved them all. I may have to dig out the old keyboard and try this for myself. I think my monitor is wonky though. And I do have that sweet 128 cartridge that plugs into the back of the keyboard. Blue screen=good, green screen=even better.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  74. Re:Slashdot Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    philantropy - adj: The act of setting up a foundation to avoid being critisied for support of TRIPS (which deprived millions of pharmacuticals, the actual death toll is unknown).

  75. Finally Junis can get on the net! by PD · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember This article by our favorite blowhard Jon Katz about a boy in Afghanistan that supposedly was on the net with his Commodore 64?

    1. Re:Finally Junis can get on the net! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Can't believe I had to wade to the last post (so far) on the thread to see someone mention this. The trolls really aren't doing their job properly (great, now my journal will get troll-flooded)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Finally Junis can get on the net! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah seriously. I was expecting this to be first off the bat. guess people have short memories except us.

    3. Re:Finally Junis can get on the net! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      There is a possibility that Junis was using an IBM compatible made by Commodore. Outside of the US Commodore sold a lot of boxes that were Intel based. Of course how the article decided to call it a Commodore 64 is beyond me. Also interesting is the question of what exactly he connected to.

    4. Re:Finally Junis can get on the net! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, get over it, Jon Katz was trolled and big time. Junis never existed and Jon was shown up as a complete tool. Why do you think his editor privs were removed after that article? Jon became an embarresment (And at Slashdot, thats saying a lot).

    5. Re:Finally Junis can get on the net! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I am over it. I agree that Jon was most likely trolled. I am saying that there is a possible non-troll explanation. I wish other /. editors were removed for their various mess-ups and inappropriate editorializing.

  76. Re:Captain's Log: My Anus is too Fucking Tight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enterprise needs script-writers like you

  77. Sigh... by armyofone · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I had a C64, I'd be happy to hook it, (or anything else), up to broadband. If it was available where I live, that is.

    Thanks for nothing Verizon...

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    1. Re:Sigh... by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

      Broadband is overrated. Good bowel movement is underrated.

  78. The downside... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    The downside is that you'll fill up the harddrive in 5 seconds!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:The downside... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Uhh...I think you mean the cassette drive (floppy drives are too expensive!)

    2. Re:The downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What hard drive?

  79. Re:Slashdot Bias TROLL by rikrebel · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I'd have to say that perhaps their buying out of the NYC public school system and assimilating the schools into the M$ collective is probably more interesting of a topic.

    Even more interesting is that Joel Klein (who was the head of the JD's antitrust division and responsible for prosecuting M$) ais now the schools chancellor. He's reported as saying he'd made up with good ole Bill-Borg.

    Very interesting.

    BTW, go troll elsewhere.

    rr

  80. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by unshaven23 · · Score: 0

    Have you ever considdered a career in ethnical erradication? You're about as cold as they get

  81. Related projects by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the spirit of an ethernet card for the C64 I'm working on the following:

    1. Climbing with gear from the 1800's
    2. Souping up a Model T
    3. Creating a fully automatic muzzle loader
    4. Compression scemes for 5.25" floppies
    5. Teaching a VERY old dog new tricks

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Related projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You forgot:


      6. Placing my penis inside Britney Spears skanky stretched open vagina.

    2. Re:Related projects by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Souping up a Model T
      That doesn't sound very challenging. I'm sure there's plenty of surface onto which you can adhere a "Type R" sticker.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Related projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mmm... skanky stretched open vagina...

      *drool*

    4. Re:Related projects by abb3w · · Score: 1

      4. Compression scemes for 5.25" floppies


      No, no, youngling. You want to start working on compression schemes for the EIGHT inch floppies, not those newfangled five-and-a-quarters. (Alas, my current computer only reads 3.5" and 5.25"s.)

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  82. A Spectrum, a C64 and an Electron walk into a bar by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... Nevermind ...

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  83. Load "*slashdot.org",8 ,1 (nt) by normal_guy · · Score: 0

    Try that one on for size!

    --

    Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
  84. So this means... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

    that the network card has more computing horsepower than the motherboard?

  85. MINIMUM DRINKING AGE, 21 in much of USA by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Subject says what he means.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  86. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you give 1% of your pay to a single charity, like I do - not counting all the one-time hits over the year - then you can post nonsense like this.

  87. Re:Wahoo! (warning: off topic & anti american) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry for being rude, but making jokes over people bombed by a greedy international criminal (I mean George W. Bush if it still wasn't clear) hurts me much

    Good. People with no sense of humor deserve to live a life of pain.

  88. Re:Wahoo! (warning: off topic & anti american) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As do supporters of terrorism (ie: everyone who gave money to Osama Bin Laden and everyone who voted for George W. Bush).

  89. For all the die hard C-64 Fans out there by DorkHead · · Score: 0

    Check this link out:
    http://www.pressplayontape.com/default.asp?pid=boy band

    That has got to be one of the coolest videos I have ever seen!

    --
    Head of the Dorks
  90. C64 p2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until a p2p app is developed for Contiki so we can all pirate our copies of pong?

    1. Re:C64 p2p by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

      As long as BT works, I'll take a C64.

  91. Was Bill right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know:

    "640k should be enough for anyone." :)

    Because 64k seems to go quite a distance here.

  92. Re:C=64 sucks, ATARI RULES!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mY cOMMODORE USES petsci, NOT ascii, tHANKyOUvERYmUCH!

  93. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By your line of reasoning, nearly everything is offtopic and not relevant except for the bare necessities of life. What a very painful existance you must lead.

    Only if your bare necessities were not being met would you understand how painful existence truly can be.

  94. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    He's not being cold, he's being real. If you give an average slashdotter $1000 what do you think he'll do with it?

    1. Feed the hungry.

    2. Buy a phat gaming machine.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  95. Comp.Sys.Amiga.Games needs your troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Calling all trolls! Calling All Trolls! Masters of the NNTP Protocol, we need your trolls in the comp.sys.amiga.games newsgroup.

    Goatse, Tubgirl, spin.gif, we need it all. Amiga is dying posts!

    If you dont post in comp.sys.amiga.games then your a nullo! Body nullification

  96. thank you, captain obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject is the message

  97. this is like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sticking a V8 engine in a go-cart...

    1. Re:this is like by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 1

      "this is like sticking a V8 engine in a go-cart..." sounds like something you would see on Home Improvement

      --

      Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  98. Old People by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 1

    Thats fantastic now even my granpa can download PrOn

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    1. Re:Old People by mlk · · Score: 1

      You could get the net on a C64 before now, just not on BB!

      FAST PORN on a C64... In 16 colours.... yeah baby!

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Old People by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      Here's the link for your grampa: Girls of 64.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  99. Java for C64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I don't know about Sun and Java, but Wabasoft created a stripped down, simplified and incompatible version of Java called Waba.

    And it seams you need at lest 68000 or 386 CPU to run it. I don't know why it needs a 32 bit processor when only using about 100KB of memory. Maybe simply noone cared about implementing a 6502 or Z80 port and it still can be done.

  100. No NetBurst by MBCook · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's because its CPU doesn't have Intel's NetBurst technology!

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  101. BIFF IS COMING BACK!!!! by puzzled · · Score: 1



    Now BIFF will be spamming Usenet 24/7 with his new broadband connection. Am I the only /. reader old enough to remember BIFF? Am I sold old that I can't recall if its a C64 or a VIC-20 he is using? Could be ...

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:BIFF IS COMING BACK!!!! by tybalt44 · · Score: 1
      You could hardly be the only one here to remember B1FF!!!!!111111!!!!

      Besides, B1FF@BIT.NET still appears from time to time on Usenet...

    2. Re:BIFF IS COMING BACK!!!! by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

      I not only remember B1FF, I remember Shit-Kickin' Jim and pondering whether to buy the C-64 or the Sinclair ZX Spectrum. I'd write more, but my arthritis is killing me.

  102. You had a hard drive? Sheesh... by gothicpoet · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I had a Commodore 64 when I was a kid. I didn't have a hard drive... I had a cassette tape drive.

    The worst part was the errors in the listings of source code in the magazines. A whole lot of typing just to see the program not actually work.

    Ah, yes, those were the days...

    It made a dorm mate's Macintosh seem nothing short of miraculous when I went to my first year of college a couple of years later.

    Using a C64 to cruise the Internet? That would be a strange experience indeed!

    --
    Quoth he ::
    "It's all academic anyway..."
  103. Somebody help me by ILuvUAmiga · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm at that point guys, the lowest of the low, been working on my project for three years, no money and I'm just beat, I'm mentally tired. I own 60% of this: http://www.convea.com Does anyone out there want to invest and help us grow? Does anyone want to my buy share a get controlling interest of a nice little dot.com with tons of potential? email me, please, do something, anything. alan.carter@convea.com

  104. Christ by truesaer · · Score: 1

    I don't understand how people have the time, energy, and money to do stuff like this. I have about half the time I need as a student, I can't imagine it gets much easier when you get a job. And even if I did have lots of free time, I can't imagine wanting to do THIS of all things.

    1. Re:Christ by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      "That is why you fail."
      - Yoda

  105. Re: Brd! BRD! B.R.D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But there is a lot of cute girls on Oktoberfest as well! Furthermore they are drunk, and not drugged.

  106. Overlords.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our 40 column retro Commodore 64 overlords..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  107. Cluster capability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we really CAN create a Beowulf cluster of these things....

  108. I'm gonna be ill. by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just let it go, people. _Let it go_ already.

    I had one of these machines when I was a kid. I outgrew BASIC fairly rapidly and started coding in assembly. My blue 6502 Assembly book was so dog eared that it made neighborhood beagles jealous. While I was taking calculus in college, I wrote a crude ray tracer that output 16 colored blocks and attempted to use screen refresh rates to eek more than 16 colors out of each text cell. I'm as big a fan of the machine as anyone, but it's time has passed.

    Now, however, both the CELL PHONE AND PDA IN MY POCKET have more beef than a C=64.

    I mean, if you're going to mod something from that era, at least use a C-128D. There's so much more room in the case.

    1. Re:I'm gonna be ill. by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      I'm as big a fan of the machine as anyone, but it's time has passed.

      But, dude, imagine a beowulf cluster of these things!!

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    2. Re:I'm gonna be ill. by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 1

      Strap 8 Handspring Visors ($25 on Ebay for a Deluxe model just about every day of the week) to the side of a 1,000BTU air-conditioning unit ($50 at a pawn shop) and turn it on full blast. It may well give the same kilowatt-hours per clockcycle. It would certainly have more RAM.

      (Yes, I am aware the Visors run on AAA-batteries.)

      You have to think about clusters as small farms for converting electricity into information. There's no sense in even feeding these power if the output is going to be so low.

      It's not like emulators for the C=64 don't exist, but I don't know what some of my raster-driven multitasking code would make of suddenly having >10,000 clockcycles per scan line as opposed to 83. (I _think_ that was the amount it was.)

      You could probably write a new 6502 emulator in Perl and have it run at the right speed with the 2Ghz machines cheaply available now.

  109. divx support? by f64 · · Score: 1

    so, anyway.

    now that i can download the next screener of 'return of the king' on my C64, how many cassette tapes would it take to save a divx?

    f64 : bringing crack to all the children of the world

    1. Re:divx support? by tybalt44 · · Score: 1

      PRESS PLAY ON TAPE

      I think a regular 60-minute cassette tape had about 80K of storage on it. So that makes 12.5 tapes per MB, or 12,500 tapes per GB. Your 10 GB super-duper movie would check in at a cool 125,000 cassette tapes, which in standard cassette cases would be... truckloads, I would guess.

  110. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    You make your living off of modifying C=64s?

    Where can I get a cool job like that?

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  111. Obvious comments by zealotasd · · Score: 1

    The referenced website obviously is hosted by a Commodore64, because it hasn't crashed yet unlike those diesel-powered Rackmount Quad Pentium4+Extreme Xeon servers that can't handle a slashdotting.

    This brings the bigger questions:

    Could the age^H^H^H maturity of a computing technology [Commodore64] be the deciding factor of how well it outperforms this much younger technology Intel and AMD shoves in everyone's server rooms?

    Could anyone provide any benchmark scores on an Imaginary BeoWULF cluster of Commodore64's? I heard some number, like about 750 [giga]Flops, but I don't want to spread rumors... ;-)

    --

    Secured Party, Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207: Creditor
  112. You are the true Retro-Uber-Geeks by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    My puny 20 antique RPN calculator collection and I worship at your feet.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  113. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Thjorska · · Score: 0

    For me: 3. Buy an awesome hat.

    --
    Current Karma Status: Roadkill
  114. what about my Commodore vic 20 by Impster · · Score: 1

    im still waiting

    1. Re:what about my Commodore vic 20 by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      Look on the Contiki site for 'the final ethernet' cartridge link - there are plans there, of course it would mean a redesign of the cartridge board but it is possible!

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  115. Atari will be next by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

    At least, I hope one day I'll be able to connect my Atari XL up to the 'net. ;)

    -bill!

  116. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "You make your living off of modifying C=64s?"

    I make a living by finding hacks like this generally useful. My company hired me to be the web master and I ended up finding other interesting stuff to do as well, such as maintaining machines and solving technical problems. I'm a systems analyst today and I've survived 2 rounds of layoffs despite lack of a college degree.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  117. 64's are already using broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a group of guys already using their broadband connections with their 64's.
    They built special userport connectors to get their BBSes back online with broadband.
    Their stuff is at http://www.petscii.com

  118. "Still waiting for the Well to load. . . " by photomic · · Score: 1

    Does Compuserve offer broadband?

  119. Sinclair ZX-81 by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    ...was my first computer, though I remember playing around on a Pet computer (my Aunt's) and a color Trash 80 (my cousin's). But the ZX-81 was mine. I used to subscribe to a magazine for ZX-81 owners, with code listings that people would submit. Spent hours typing in games like Minefield and others.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  120. Aah! My Commodore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not supposed to get jigs in it!

  121. Re:You had a hard drive? Sheesh... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    I had a Commodore 64 when I was a kid. I didn't have a hard drive... I had a cassette tape drive.

    Yeah, but that was then - this is now :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  122. Re:You had a hard drive? Sheesh... by gothicpoet · · Score: 1
    Errr... so you're saying you have a cassette tape drive now?

    (kidding of course... but I'll bet someone out there does.)

    --
    Quoth he ::
    "It's all academic anyway..."
  123. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3. Buy some hookers and play blackjack... Oh wait, scratch the blackjack.

  124. What about.. by vraddict · · Score: 0

    my TRS-80 (Trash 80). It has a whole 16k of RAM, but double the processing power with 2Mhz. An ethernet adapter would seem better suited for this monster.

  125. Re: Brd! BRD! B.R.D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But there is a lot of cute girls on Oktoberfest as well! Furthermore they are drunk, and not drugged.

    And this is an advantage because...?

  126. Contiki? by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to run this under VICE and still get broadband connectivity (DSL)?

    --
    -Cnik
    1. Re:Contiki? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      IIRC there is work on a RR-Net 'emulation' for VICE, but I think it's still in the alpha stages.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  127. Now all we need by JamesP · · Score: 1

    Is to figure out how to install a ATI card in order to play Half Life 2 w; maximum framerate...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  128. C64 web server exists too - combine them both! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already have a C64 web server for the serial line, now they need to adapt it for broadband. :-)
    c64 web server
    old slashdot reference to c64 webserver

  129. Amen and Hallelujah. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    I remember sitting and war-dialing the local BBS waiting for the guy who was hogging the line to finally log off.


    Heh. BBS's for one user at a time... Man that takes me back.

    1. Re:Amen and Hallelujah. by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I remember dialing up our local library BBS, accessing their card catalog system. It was pretty cool. Back before computers got "cool".

      --
      I hate sigs.
    2. Re:Amen and Hallelujah. by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      One of the first BBSes that I was really active on was a C-Net board. It ran on a Commodore 64 with a 300 baud modem and two floppy drives.

      But then, I started BBSing before I had a computer, on a DecWriter Printing Terminal I got at a thrift store, hooked to an acoustic coupler.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  130. wanted: casettes by f64 · · Score: 1

    ??V?\lo all. please support my project to bring divx quality movies to the C64. i need cassettes. lots of cassettes. like, really really lot of cassettes.

    contact me for shipping info.

    f64 :

  131. Re:C=64 sucks, ATARI RULES!!!!!!! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Informative
    C64's didn't use standard ASCII, they used "PETSCII" which had an ecleptic collection including everything from cursor control codes, colour change codes, function key codes, and a large assortment of graphic symbols.

    Weird but kinda neat... how many computers do you know where you can write an upward-slanting diagonal, multi-coloured string with a single PRINT statement? :)

    This reminds me of the only single-line animation program I've ever seen... It was basically (no pun intended):
    10 A$="{cu}{cd}{cl}{cr}":PRINT " ";MID$(A$,INT(RND(1)*4),1);"O{cl}";:GOTO 10
    Where {cX} are cursor codes for up, down, left, and right.

    Ahh.. those were the days. Reaching for the power switch was the longest part of bootup time, and nary a bit was wasted. BASIC interpreter in 8KB, DOS in 8KB, and a complete graphical OS (GEOS) in 64KB. And a dozen games on a 170K floppy :)

    I think it's time to dig up an emulator and play some Impossible Mission, Space Taxi, and Jumpman :)
    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  132. Too bad... by voxel · · Score: 1

    Too Bad with the C64's 1mhz 6510 CPU at 56k modem speeds this almost causes a bottle neck in itself! :P

    Over exaggerating! Me? No way!

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  133. 8 bit Seti@Home client anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I try hard enough I might be able to imagine a Beowulf cluster of these...

  134. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by joe83 · · Score: 1

    Your premise of "my line of reasoing" is based on your three questions. Well ,here is a reality check: No one really gives a rat's rectum what you think and I will bet YOU are the one with the "painful existence"

  135. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then get out and get a fucking job, even if it is "beneath you".

  136. Is it supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the new version of nMap detect this OS?

    nmap -sS -PT -PI -O -T 3 192.168.1.1

    Starting nmap V. 3.00 ( www.insecure.org/nmap )
    Interesting ports on (xxx.xxx.x.xx):
    (The 1600 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
    Port State Service
    80/tcp open http
    Remote operating system guess: Contiki (Commodore64)
    Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 12 seconds


    /fyodor: WTF?!?!?

  137. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the 20% you talk about don't have enough money to buy food, then they probably don't have enough money to replace their old Commodore 64's with new PCs either.

    I say we ban poor people from Slashdot, that way we don't have to hear them bitch about being hungry. Its so aggrivating having to listen to all these poor tribesmen from Africa come onto Slashdot and complain about being hungry. Who the hell gave Starvin Marvin a laptop, anyway?

    Besides, it is well documented that there is plenty of food. Sally Struthers is just hording it. Snacky Cakes, Cheesy Poofs, Beefy Logs and more. If they would just watch more TV, they would know where the food was. This is why poor people piss me off, too lazy to watch TV and learn shit. Thank you.

  138. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing personal, but every practicing Mormon gives 10% of their GROSS income, as do many Catholics. 1% is nice, but not exactly giving until it hurts.

  139. Ditto by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Man, I feel old. The TS/1000 was also my first machine, and I just turned 30 a couple of days ago. Ouch.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  140. I highly doubt it by multipartmixed · · Score: 3, Informative

    From a cursory glance at the board, it looks like it plugs into the user port. That means it has access to the data lines from the 6526 VIA, which yields a single memory-mapped address for I/O.

    That means the fastest you could write a page would be something like this:

    STA 56579, 255
    LDX, #0
    LOOP:
    LDA $BUFFER,X
    STA 56577
    DEX
    BEQ LOOP ...I think that adds up to 3 + 3 + 1 + 2 cycles per byte, and an overhead of at least 6 more cycles per page crossed. You could shave off two cycles out of the loop by using addresses in the zero page, but since some of those addresses are reserved, you wouldn't be able to use all 255 bytes.

    In order to do DMA, the controller would need to plug into the expansion port, which gives you direct access to the address and data lines of the system bus. But as another poster pointed out, you have to blank the video during transfers to achieve maximal throughput due to the VIC-IIs habit of stealing cycles for itself.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:I highly doubt it by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that DMA could fill the memory in ~1/8 of a second, letting the CPU hog some time shouldn't inhibit your transfer rate to any appreciable degree. Actually, I think I've got my DMA tranfer rate wrong. I'm assuming 1 bit per cycle instead of 1 byte (does it have an 8 bit wide bus?). A bus that's 8bits wide would transfer 8Mbits per sec. Still way faster than necessary. :-)

  141. two clocks? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? I think some instructions (NOP, NMI?) are one clock. But it's been ten years since I've looked.

    Of course, your point is still valid, IIRC most of the indirect load/store instructions were three clocks, more if you cross page boundaries, one less if you're dealing with zero page.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:two clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      NOP is technically 1 cycle, but the CPU also fetches a garbage argument and wastes another cycle. Oh, how it would be nice to have a 1-cycle opcode as a democoder =P

    2. Re:two clocks? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      I think you have to rely on the one cycle difference between taking a branch and not taking it (to the same location). That should get you cycle synchronised. Didn't the Atari systems have a lovely register that you could access to halt the cpu until an hblank? That would make things easier too :-)

  142. SID Web pages instead of MIDI? by tekrat · · Score: 1

    As Coktiki OS has a webserver, does this mean I can build a webpage for the C64 that loads up a SID file when the other user hits the site with a C64?

    I mean, I'm tired of all those lousy MIDI files I heave to listen to on other people's sites, but a SID would be really cool!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  143. Atari is just better. by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1

    ...but Atari is still better. You can use SIO2PC to use your desktop or server as Atari floppy, you can also use Atari as console. But most important, obvious reason why Atari is just better: best multiplayer strategy game on 8-bit computers was about planet IRATA. If you don't know what game is it, then you lost your best years, trust me :)

  144. Old News by Grayswan · · Score: 1

    All this with a computer that is old enough to drink

    I drank my C64 many years ago. Sold it and bought beer.

    I'm just sitting here watching the bits go round and round.

    --
    If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  145. Re:Irresponsible. C64 are safe for Internet. by geekgirl14 · · Score: 1

    There are no viruses for C64s. How do you put a virus onto a computer that boots from a read only floppy? I believe its more dangerous to the internet to run PCs with Micro$oft OS and software. Had any nice worms lately? Debian rules!

  146. well i can see that you're a foreigner by your by waspleg · · Score: 1

    user name so i'll break it down for you

    americans drink oil; lots of oil

    think about it

  147. Not quite true by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    Old satellites have a significant processing time as well. Getting from Europe to US through a satellite connection takes about 500->600 ms, where light only accounts for ~200ms of them (satellites are at ~40K Km - 100ms for light). Good ol' traceroute.

    --

    The Raven

  148. Re:DOES ANYBODY HERE GIVE A RATS ASS??? -- No :/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope.

  149. First Command by shoemakc · · Score: 2, Funny

    LOAD PORN,8,1

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
    1. Re:First Command by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      Oh stop. :P you forgot the quotes...

      LOAD"PORN",8,1

      Actually, with JiffDOS, it'd be %PORN :)

  150. Re:what a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to one-up him with last month's FARK-bred sarcasm. Go paypal a forum account, you butt mud popsicle.

  151. amazing huh? by layingMantis · · Score: 1

    We're so stupid, it's almost amazing the we lead the world in technological innovation and our military stands unchallenged as the greatest ever. Go figure.

    1. Re:amazing huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, thank goodness for all the immigrants.

    2. Re:amazing huh? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      And we have the biggest dicks too!

      I mean, that is what you were getting to eventually, no?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:amazing huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lead the world in tochnological inovation? You've been listening to too much Bill Gates there. Asia leads the world in technology these days. The U.S is just a large market.

      Apparently Iraq had the 8th largest standing army in the world at the begining of the year. What good did that do them?

  152. I don't know what you're talking about by paroneayea · · Score: 1

    The commodore and I have been drinking buddies for years.

    --
    http://mediagoblin.org/
  153. Re:Irresponsible. C64 are safe for Internet. by stryyker · · Score: 0

    Seems you're ill informed. Read only floppy? Most are read/write and people used hard drives too. And there was atleast 1 virus than ran on C64 but it was no biggy.

  154. Why..? by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

    would I want to drink a C64??

  155. Re:what a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    virgin

  156. Re:DOES ANYBODY HERE GIVE A RATS ASS??? by dosius · · Score: 1

    I'll care if someone can make one of these for my Apple //e.

    -uso.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  157. Re:Model T's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, They DO soup up nicely...

    http://k.webring.com/hub?sid=&ring=tbucket&id=&h ub

  158. 64K of RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Also, the C-64 has a mere -- surprise! -- 64K of RAM

    YOURS may have that miserly amount. the rest of us bothered to upgrade it! ;-)

  159. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just realistic. There are too many people in this world to support Why feed them this year, only to have them hungry again next year? Thats about the same level as keeping someone alive just to torture them once a week.

  160. Re:Be relevant! 20% are hungry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you'll find thats called Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. What this guy has done is probably directly applicable to many embedded systems. I'd say he could easily get a job doing that, on the back of an Ethernet card for the C=64.

  161. Re:C=64 sucks, ATARI RULES!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only that C-64 didn't use ASCII, it used a slightly modified character set that has been called PETSCII.

  162. GEOS will take down Windows! by Throtex · · Score: 1

    Has anyone gotten Netscape to run under GEOS? :)

  163. Bonus. by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is some telnet software and I'm all set... I really gotta get my C128 outa the basement and back up and running. I bought a 20mhz super cpu for it, and still have yet to install it. Damn. Gotta do.

  164. A vowel taste.. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Besides, you wouldn't want to be known for murdering the baby u's, would you? Of course not. Some insist that it's mean to enslave them, but I say they have a right to work just as hard (or taste just as bad) as all the other vowels.

    [Wondering how someone who knows honourable spellings wound up on my freaks list??!]

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  165. Dude, you're getting a Minitel!!! by msaroff · · Score: 1

    More seriously, isn't this just a slightly souped up Minitel running on a bit more computing power than the original?

  166. waiting for... by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    the first C-64 virus!